skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Define for yourself a different set of objectives: find the novelty in staying 2, 3 years at a company, in having a life without debt, in having money set aside.
Work for a company that has a big and complex project. There are projects where it's virtually impossible to get to know all the parts of the code. Lower a little bit your definition of novelty when you're at work: consider as new having to work on bugs/features that you don't have any idea where are situated in the codebase when you first hear about them.
Remember, there are jobs where you have to work only 8 hours.

Take one of those jobs and spend your afternoons working on your own projects which can be implemented using whatever technology you want and can be as concrete as you want.

Look at your job as a necessary hell, but try to find the fun in it while at work and always remember that you have your fun projects back at home
Corel iGrafx Keygen Plus Serial Number Free Download Full Version
Because cars aren't crows?

By car, Google Maps says "Poplar, Blackwall & District Rowing Club" to "Greenwich Pier" ( https://www.google.com/maps/dir/Poplar,+Blackwall+%26+Distri... ) takes 6.9 miles and 22 minutes.

Using the Greenwich Foot Tunnel under the Thames, it takes 7 minutes to walk the 0.3 miles.
The problem here is not a gift card, the problem here is shoplifting.

Naturally Petco does not want to repel gift card customers just because they cannot catch shoplifters.
Once shoplifter succeeded - he can sell stuff on eBay, on Craigslist, via gift cards or just directly on the street.

Gift card is just a convenience vehicle that Petco agreed upon to keep opened regardless of where merchandise came from.

In fact many stores do ask my ID and address/phones numbers before accepting returns.
It's hard to make millions with this type of theft (not fraud) model. After 3-rd return without receipt - pretty much every store will kick person's butt out of the store or call security/police.
Ngx_mruby supports TCP Load balancing feature scripting with mruby
This looks pretty nice. It's worth pointing to the seq2seq TensorFlow example which covers a lot of similar topics.

Is there an example anywhere of how to initilize from the word2vec embeddings?
Yup, their logic is very hard to understand. What am I supposed to do, take a week of PTO? I'd think they want to find people who badly want to work at their company, but they are just not that kind of company yet.
Best comment ever ^-- right here.
OpenPGP best practices
For me at least, I made the switch to OS X simply because of software support. There wasn't a good Linux equivalent for Sequel Pro; there's no git gui tool on Linux that matches SourceTree (which my team was standardizing on for its gitflow integration); etc.

And damn, the hardware is just nice. If I could run Fedora on a MacBook Pro, that'd be my ideal setup. Or if OS X wasn't so terrible at customization -- the number of sketchy hacks I've had to install to get my setup how I like it is just depressing.
Startup develops a syringe with tiny sponges that can stop bleeding fast
1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + ... = -1/12
Before, Machine guns were either mounted outside the propeller circle (which made aiming harder) or propellers had deflectors on the back which made them less efficient.
A Quest for Greater Freedom
'Culture bundling' and other obstacles to a real gun control debate
The handshake agreement presented here makes me very happy.

Were many revisions done on it, or was it pretty clear to write?
Plan C is just great. I always can get excited about software if its written in C. I still havent figured out why though.
What kind of job requires novelty? How about reviewer/writer of new technology? How about testing of new products? May not pay as much as software engineering, but you seem to not actually be successful at doing that anyway.

Also, if you haven't yet talked about this with a mental health professional, you probably should. It may take trying a few before you find someone who understands your particular problem.
I'm decent (not awesome) at choosing one and going with it for a few months.

I find that when I'm a morning person I'm much better at getting "needed stuff" done and also take better care of my health. When I do the night-owl thing, I'm far better at the more forward-thinking things but struggle more with taking care of myself and can procrastinate on short-term requirements.

I also find that night-owling can make me feel depressed after a while, not taking care of things that I should, whereas being a morning person can make me feel trivial after a while, not really putting any deep thought into things.

There's some quote the origin escapes me like "they wake up so early because there's so much to do, and go to sleep so early because there's so little to think about" (I'm thinking Middlemarch, but can't find it), which pretty much sums it up. You can't win. (That said I'm pretty happy when on a multi-week solo bike tour and waking up early every day).
Well, it's good to know that I basically got it right. I don't work in incident response, so I had to make an educated guess at what signatures I'd assume IR people would use to respectably say "this is a nation-state."

> I work with one of the people interviewed in the article, we've been having some fun on Slack with it

Ooh boy. I don't think there's much you can do about something like this other than laugh it off, and also maybe recognize that hey, you're probably doing something of influence. (And probably make lots of jokes about APTs.)
The interesting use case for me is that you can make a sorted index and look up records efficiently, i.e. within a script. It works with ctags indexes, for instance.
Just incase anyone has forgotten this
I agree with some of the other comments that advise you to look into jobs which involve novelty, instead of swimming against the current.

With your generalist skills, you may make a great developer evangelist who can give overviews and demos of new technologies at developer talks, internal corporate trainings, or online trainings. They get paid well and I have come across some right here on HN.
It's not "just because someone else has and thinks I should too".

Your 25-year-old car probably emits a lot more harmful substances into the air than recent cars do, so someone could argue that you are actually harming others by continuing to drive it.

Similarly, one could argue that your use of computing devices that only support outdated cryptography is harmful to other people, because it makes it difficult for everyone else to upgrade to more secure algorithms. You might not be directly forcing anyone else to make any particular choice, but your choice contributes to the perpetuation of an insecure ecosystem, just like your car contributes to air pollution in your neighborhood.
I think it varies quite a bit from person to person. For me, the peak productivity time is 11-3 (PM). I wake up at 9:30, have breakfast and coffee while doing some casual reading and then work until 5ish with a break for lunch. On this schedule I'm usually at least as productive as the people I work with even though I'm "on the clock" for fewer hours. I find I tend to have extremely high productivity but I can't maintain it for as long, so it balances out. Keeping going after I'm tired to meet an 8 hour requirement is just a waste of time and the work I do after I'm burned out is crap.

When I've tried working longer hours (by starting earlier) my total productivity goes down significantly. I know a lot of people who just say you get used to getting up earlier, but I never do. Even maintaining an early-ish schedule waking up at 6:30 for a full year, I was just plain miserable every day and it never got better. On the other hand, I know plenty of people who only get stuff done in the morning and rise early. Whatever works, but it sucks when jobs force everybody to start on an stupendously early schedule. But it cuts both ways - I don't want to force other people to work on my schedule if that makes them miserable.
It was code in my program.
Saying that OS X has "training wheels" just basically discounts you from a comparative discussion of OS's in my opinion. It's substance-free denigration that adds nothing to the conversation.

If there are parts of OS X that you don't like, fine, post about those, specifically.

Adobe products run fine on Windows, in fact Premiere runs better on Windows than Mac. But the parent was comparing Macs to Linux, and Adobe does not run on Linux at all.
I can somewhat relate. Although I was able to trace the cause of my novelty addiction to a particular job. I then built that into a career path for a bit (doing short term, very targeting consulting jobs. Most were subcontracts to larger projects) and oddly got tired of it and forced myself back to focusing on one thing. I do still find myself reverting back to always wanting to do new things. Usually I will devote a few hours a week just to doing something new or learning something new. Downtime between projects is used for learning as well. I make this a habit to feed my addiction to new things.

My first job in a R&D/Testing type role was working for an application service provider. I was responsible for evaluating new hardware from vendors before it would be released to our data centers. I had to not only test the hardware, but ensure the applications worked correctly, performance test, and document configurations. Each week was something new and I had great relationships with vendors such as Compaq, HP, Dell, and Microsoft that would constantly send demo hardware/software just so I could play. I left the job to take a position at Microsoft, and looking back regret it. I stayed at Microsoft for a little over a year for the same reason as you, I got bored. That is when I switched to just doing consulting.

But, if that doesn't work, I would look for positions in R&D for a company (that is the type of position where I traced my problem back to). Depending on the company/position you actually get paid to find and work with new "toys". Also, look at testing type positions.
"If you have a passion for bitcoin, a computer science degree, or experience with one of the languages we use"

Doesn't mention which languages in the post. Am I supposed to know this?
That sounds like relatively inexperienced technical people attempting to hire more experienced technical people, to over-simplify a bit.

If you want to build a house and you're not sure how to best build a house you're going to be very cautious hiring someone to build a house because you don't know if their way of building a house is any good, because you don't know how to build a house.

That is a tough problem for a group to solve.
I agree with ya. It takes a lil work to get Linux tuned to your needs, but once set up it rocks hard. I use Ubuntu server with the i3 wm and a bunch of shell scripts. I control my world with just my keyb and I love it.
ABBYY FineReader 12 Professional Crack for PC Free Edition
Call-out quote:

[S]cience and technology are inherently political, and whether we want to think about it that way or not, it’s the nature of the beast. Our training as scientists and engineers tends to deemphasize the social positioning of what we do, and most of us scientists don’t give a whole lot of thought to how our work impacts society. But it obviously does.
Why not Swig2?
Here’s a twist on the puzzle:

What if there are L seats, where L >= N. (If L > N, not all the seats are assigned to people)

What is the probability that the last person sits on his own seat?
That only matters if results differ between each person. If everyone has the same results, 18 people is plenty to prove that the results are the same for everyone. It depends on the sample variance and the number of people. If you have high sample variance, you need a higher N to make it less likely that you have a sampling error. If you have very low sample variance, just a few people is enough.
It is really sad that the people funding these excellent researchers have no fucking clue about AI (they know plenty about other things and have done plenty of good work, but the level of nonsense here is striking). Thank God they are giving the money to competent people instead of doing what they think they are doing with it.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atwater_system

protein is counted as 4 because it's harder to digest, even though it's more than 5 calories when burned

carbs and fats are easy to digest so they're counted as-is
In this case I was using vim to edit source files that was interfacing with a slightly buggy kernel API, so it would panic several times per day.
I spend half an hour daily going through my ~100 tech-related RSS feeds in Thunderbird. Works well for me. What's the obvious flaw with RSS?
I said being shot at. 100% of WW1 soldiers are dead even if none of the bullets hit them.

I'm not saying that nuclear weapons production didn't kill people; just that the statistic they cited is utterly useless.
Short-sightedness is reaching epidemic proportions
That seem abysmally slow for grep. On my machine, with a 1.1G file made of 1200 copies of /usr/share/dict/words, GNU grep 2.16 takes about 1.5 seconds. Try with LC_ALL=C?
I'm very heartened by Twitter taking this approach to protect their users, but it comes about a week after I was very disappointed by the process of signing up for a Twitter account through Tor. I wanted an account that wasn't linked to me personally -- it was at least partially an experiment in anonymity, but it failed completely when Twitter blocked my signup until I provided a verifiable phone number.

Twitter denies this in the article, of course:

>(Twitter has denied blocking Tor. In September, Twitter spokesperson Nu Wexler told Motherboard, “Twitter does not block Tor, and many Twitter users rely on the Tor network for the important privacy and security it provides. Occasionally, signups and logins may be asked to phone verify if they exhibit spam-like behavior. This is applicable to all IPs and not just Tor IPs.”)

I get why they want to keep suspicious actors out of their ecosystem, but the only suspicious thing I did was try to be anonymous. If protecting people from "state-sponsored attack" was actually a priority, they'd figure out ways to enable people to protect themselves.
Hunching over a tiny display has never appealed to me. For many years, I expected that HUDs would become common for smartphones. But it never happened. Glass was backasswards. I'm obviously not in the target demographic.
Except the trading interface is an API. You can keep all your precious algorithms on your own computer.
Vim suggests closing with ":quit" when you hit C-c; the C-x is irrelevant.

Upon receiving a C-c, it does not know full well what the user wants to do.

When vim receives a C-c from you (or someone who just stumbled into vim and doesn't know how to exit) the user wants to exit.

When vim receives a C-c from me, it's because I meant to kill the process I spawned from vim, and it ended before the key was pressed. I very much do not want it to quit on me at that point.

Showing a message seems the best compromise.
What I appreciate most is that he is upfront and honest about it so nobody needs waste time making changes that won't be accepted. (Or if they do, they know that they're forking). As an approach it is understandable for something that solves your problem but which you have no intention of maintaining but it won't help a project be successful.
I switched. Here's how:

I was training martial arts like crazy at the time, after work 5 days a week.

I wanted to compete in a tournament. To qualify I had to attend 'special' classes early in the morning. They started 6:30AM, and that meant a 5:30AM wakeup for me.

So I set an alarm and did the first morning. I put the alarm in the next room, so I'd be forced to get up and turn it off.

Going out in the dark felt as weird as going out without any pants on. I was convinced no one else would turn up for the training. They all did, of course.

I did this 5 days the first week, and spent all day at work half-asleep at my desk.

By the end of the following week I felt normal, and it's been my routine ever since, tho I'm not training any more.

I'm still not a 'genuine' morning person. I can't maintain a conversation before 7AM, but I am productive.

Speaking of being more productive: if I head to work at 6AM, the couple hours I get of no interruptions are guaranteed to be the most productive in my day.
Books, magazines and newspapers are different, in that there's no need to actively use the hands.
Have you considered a career in information/computer security?

I have some of the same tendencies, and infosec has given me all the entertainment I can handle and then some.

(There are other fields adjacent to software engineering which you might prefer as well---consulting, operations.)
XCHANGE LEASING, LLC is not directly owned by Uber. However, it's obviously indirectly controlled by them.

The "They aren't" was in reference to the fact that said contractors aren't directly leasing the cars from Uber.
Treed: A Tree Editor in JavaScript
Worm Web Serial is pretty good. A couple of 'down' spots but I devoured it in a couple weeks.

"It totals roughly 1,680,000 words"

https://parahumans.wordpress.com/
> Is there a cure from novelty-seeking behavior?

Start a project, commit to the technologies beforehand, and deviate under no circumstances.

Facebook was built with PHP. AdWords was built with MySQL. Instagram was built with Django. GitHub was built with Rails. Stack Overflow was built with Microsoft technologies.

It seems there are few instances where a "boring" tech stack prevents the product from being built. If the idea is good enough, you'll make it work with what's on hand.

If you can commit to a stack, yet still can't finish a project, you may have to face some uncomfortable possibilities: that your ideas are no good, or that you're simply not a very good programmer.

Attention span is a requirement for being a decent programmer.
Muslims in US fear increasing prejudice on wave of anti-Islamic sentiment
Using Cython for simple C++ binding is pretty great, esp. if one takes care to use as much STL data structures at the API level as possible.
If you used tor then your IP came out of a Tor exit node, which is almost certainly associated with someone else's concurrent bad/spammy behavior. How could they know your aren't the bad guy?
Property in L Zone Delhi
Find information about smart city Delhi and a new residential project Dreamz Residency located at L-Zone Dwarka with all modern features and lots of amenities.For more details visit to http://www.dreamzresidency.co.in
>Mathematics should not proceed based on a secret sauce.

Thanks god Mathematica is not mathematics the science, then, but just a tool in assisting with doing math and physics and all kinds of calculations.

>*In mathematics, the details of the computation are almost always far more interesting than the result.

Yeah, just not in any case Mathematica, Maple, R, Matlab etc were involved.
You could expose the user to a c-style header?
I wonder why IP based blocking is still a thing (e.g. Wikipedia). With the IPv4 exhaustion and IPv6 non-adoption, many people who are not associated at all share a single public IPv4 address. How could a blocking policy based on IP ever going to have lower enough false positive rate?
I'm not sure the comparison here is entirely fair.

On Linux systems, often most or all of the software being used is installed from the distro packages using the distro's package manager. Usually things go smoothly in this context.

On Windows systems, often most or all of the software being installed is installed using third party installers, which may have their own versions of various dependencies. The Windows infrastructure has to cope with this much less predictable context, and much of the time it does so reasonably effectively.

If you need to build third party software from source on Linux, or do more tricky things like cross-compiling to run on some embedded device, things are often far less pretty. Often you are just trusting that someone's makefile running under sudo won't dump junk all over your system, and that if it does, the uninstall target will tidy up properly -- which, in my experience, is not a safe bet on either count. Even building something from source in the first place on Linux typically depends on system-provided compilers and probably standard libraries, which as we saw with some relatively recent GCC changes can switch ABIs in non-backwards-compatible ways, potentially causing serious problems of their own.

In short, things look much better on Linux as long as you stay within the walled garden of your distro's own package management system. As soon as you need to go beyond that, you're probably in the Wild West.
>I realised that the only thing that motivates me in software engineering is learning new things

One could question if you really "learn" those new things, instead of merely skimming over them, since you don't seem to stay with them long enough to really get into the details.

Maybe what you're afraid is really learning? Which involves comitting to a stack, and also getting to the parts where a project approaches being finished, which is where the real and important issues emerge.
While this would be a very cool formula for generating some interesting indie type games, that scale is far too small to produce anything that could compete in the AAA space.

And good luck convincing anyone that retiring Mario, Zelda, and Pokemon would be a good idea.
This simple negotiation tactic brought 195 countries to consensus (COP21)
SwiftShader 3.0 for 64 and 32 Bit Latest Full Version
Right. And therefore rather pointless as the reason to capture these drones is because of safety issues.
I can relate. I get bored really quickly as well, and I am one of those people who usually kicks ass at a new job for about the first year, and then starts to tail off after that because I'm bored out of my mind.

I've found two things that seem to help:

1. Start a startup. I started Fogbeam at least in part because it gives me an outlet to pursue things that are interesting to me, and a place to work on really cool new cutting edge stuff, even if my day-job doesn't. Back at my last "boring enterprise software development" job, I found that coming home and working on Fogbeam stuff helped keep me sane. (Note: in my scenario the startup is just a side project, but if you have savings or feel like raising money, I suppose you could just jump into it full time. YMMV)

2. Become a consultant. I started consulting for Mammoth Data back in 2012, and I've found that this consulting lifestyle is quite a bit more interesting than the typical "sit at the same desk, working on the same product, with the same people" routine. I'm constantly working on new and different things... every project is different, and since we focus on "Big Data", analytics, BI, etc., there's a non-stop stream of new technologies being invented / released that we have to try and keep up with. In the past year or two I've worked with Neo4J, Hadoop, Spark, Storm, Kafka, Knox, HBase, Phoenix, Couchbase, EMR, Google's Cloud stuff, Impala, Kinesis, Pentaho, and probably some other stuff I'm forgetting. The downside, of course, is the need to travel a lot at times (which is another of those "good and bad" things) and the feeling you get sometimes that you're drowning in all this new stuff. Example: In the past month or two, 3 different major companies have released distributed Machine Learning platforms (Google, IBM and Microsoft). And every day or two there's some new Hadoop / Big Data related sub-project hitting the Apache Incubator. And as a consultant, I feel a need to be on top of all of that stuff.. which, unfortunately, it's pretty much impossible to be.

Another side-note: You may find that signing up for and taking lots of MOOC's on Coursera, Udacity, EdX, etc. may serve as an outlet for your neophilia, and might let you stay more focused at work. Just treat coming home and working on a cool new class on Machine Learning or Synthetic Biology or $WHATEVER as a reward for putting in a good day of hard, focused work at the day-job.