skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I worked with Phil at Jut (and wrote the post), and remember him being referenced fairly frequently in my job interviews. ("You know, you remind me of Phil, though much less talented and without the ruggedly handsome bit.") To my count, he setup the wireless and wired infrastructure, ran the post-sprint meetings, setup some DevOps sandboxes for application testing, helped troubleshoot customer installs, coded, wrote tons of internal docs on the wiki, helped onboard confused new hires, and set up the MAME arcade machine. I'm certainly missing a ton. I'm not sure what his title was (Technical Director?), but he was basically the first person to go to when you didn't know who to go to.
Welcome to the new WhatsApp owned by Facebook!
I can't help but wonder if this is a case of correlation != causation.

I'm thinking particularly because the focus is on patriarchal, unequal and heavily stratified societies. That makes me wonder if it would make for a different study if it compared with gender neutral polyamorous societies with many-to-many relationships. I'm not aware that such societies exist in socially significant volumes outside of small groupings though. Still, it smacks a little of Eurocentricism.
The Euro has acted as a strangling device for everyone in the union not named Germany. For Germany, it has enabled them to ride an artificially cheaper currency with their exports (were they using their own currency, it would be far more expensive). For Italy, Spain, Portugal, Greece etc, the currency held them back by being even more expensive than their own currency would have been; for eg Finland, it has prevented them from making adjustments to become more competitive on numerous cost structures. The end result has been eight years of no net economic growth (and in recent dollar terms it's now far worse than that).

The lack of Eurozone growth will spur more QE for years to come. The US is presently done with its QE program, and there's nothing on the horizon that indicates it'll need to return to that in the next several years (large budget deficits would cause that, but so far Congress isn't growing spending in an out of control manner).

That context will push the Euro lower, and the USD higher versus. Until the Eurozone can show off serious growth (not 0.3%-0.5% type 'growth'), rapidly improving household balance sheets, and a significantly improving employment picture (not 11%), the Euro will struggle.
A woman making 10K and a woman making 100K will both face social pressure against dating a guy making 80% of what they do, since the pressure is about the relevant income and not the total income. So this means that the more women make, the bigger this problem becomes because it drives up what is considered a rich enough guy, even if there wasn't the other problem of the wealth gap growing.
12px font also could become very small in the future, if typical computer displays end up having high dpi.

I guess a conforming browser should randomly sample computer displays before deciding how big 1px is.

Serious version: I don't think text like that should make it into a standard.
Pattern: Back ends for Front ends
You mean like this article?

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2015/11/25...
I'm not sure you need the Inline::Perl5.

You do, currently.

I don't think it's implemented yet

It is - nine's Inline::Perl5 module has been around for a year or so.
What a radical suggestion.
The Silicon Rally Real data chart gives an interesting trend.
it does feel a little backwards, but i can see the utility.

i still hope there is a better solution out there for memory management than using a GC. they are pretty much golden sledgehammers for this problem and enable lots of very bad practice to occur without leaking (this is both a strength and a weakness though...).
Website Engagement is your website purpose
But that's not evidence of polygyny. Lowered sexual dimorphism in humans suggests we have a long biological history of social monogamy, compared to the dimorphism correlation in socially polygamous mammals.
GitHub turned out to be a pretty decent place for collaborating on various lists.

I mean, the list of awesome lists[0] is currently the 23rd most starred GitHub project.

I'm using GitHub both as a collaborative tool for creating lists and as my own tool for creating lists (as an example, a list of books I have read / am reading / planning on reading [1]).

[0] https://github.com/sindresorhus/awesome

[1] https://github.com/aleksandar-todorovic/notes/blob/master/00...
Good old Cunningham's Law.
Why are these posts down voted? It should be the responsibility of the OP to post an accessible article. Maybe we should start posting the google search link instead of the paywalled link?
Done! Much clearer now, I think.
FYI, the current session of Andrew Ng's ML class starts today.
Both were not that big - at least not for the C API and text IR users. Worse for the C++ users, obviously, but that was never promised to stay stable and not covered by such a huge number of tests to deter any breaking changes.
Auslogics Anti-Malware 2016 Serial Keys
I always said the dollar will lose its position as an outlier eventually. Reversion to the mean.
Possibly even more pedantic, have you noticed how, even though the authors clearly know the difference between polygyny and polygamy, they seem to somtimes use both terms interchangeably?
I'm not wrong in fact.

"Some 39 percent of the world’s wealth belongs to Americans, while Western Europe accounts for another 31 percent."

And that was before the huge asset rebound in the US, and was a drop of 12% due to the great recession.

http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/09/14/americas-domina...

Allianz's 2015 report indicates North America holds 45% of all global financial assets. Unless you're pretending that Canada and Mexico hold 20% of all global assets, your figures are wildly off the mark (Canada is less rich than the US per capita on average, and Mexico is far less so); at a minimum the US holds 40% to 42% of all global wealth.

https://www.allianz.com/v_1443702256000/media/economic_resea...
It's a Pink Floyd reference, obviously.
So I found this which sheds some light:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kQDQ3Ps_-b4

tl;dr: they just let them ride the wind.
Tech powered Optimism Brewing is the new king of beers on Capitol Hill, Seattle
Google ratings are much easier to game, from what I hear
(other people have answered you already, and their answers seem quite knowledgeable, but I sense their answers are actually off the point of your question, i.e. I think there is a better answer than you have been given. However, I learned this material long time ago and the precise answer is not fresh in my mind, so hopefully I can give you the gist, we'll see, but apologies in advance for all my hand waving)

it's like this: if I give you a large number and say "factor this", you will work hard figuring out the answer, but if I give you a set of factors and say multiply them together and see if they equal the big number, you can do that fairly quickly. i.e. you can check the answer a lot easier than you can find the answer.

An NP complete optimal routing problem is the same way, it's hard to find an answer, but if somebody gives you the optimal solution, it is easy to check that it is optimal by substituting segments from the solution set for segments that are not in the solution set, and trying to incrementally improve on it: if you have a solution, none of your substitutions will piece-wise be an improvement, furthermore, you can do it in an orderly way that "proves" your route is best precisely without duplicating all your work. This is the part I don't remember but it's something like "find the longest segment on your route, is there some shorter way to accomplish what that accomplishes? no there isn't. or look at the shortest segments, are they penny-wise but pound-foolish, no they aren't." i.e. the part I do remember is that it is polynomial time to confirm the answer, and it is not polynomial time to find the answer. This is what is in fact meant by "non-deterministic polynomial", it's polynomial only if you magically know the answer in a non-deterministic way. Polynomial to check, but in a deterministic way it is not polynomial to determine.

Again, sorry for all the handwaving, but I'm pretty certain that's right.

Oh, and while I'm here, what was the most irritating thing about this article is that P vs NP is not a huge "assumption". Call it a conjecture, call it a hypothesis, call it a problem to solve, but it's not an assumption, it's been tested long and hard by a lot of really smart people and it's the fringes of our knowledge. That's not what is typically meant by the word "assumption".
If there are, "significantly higher levels rape, kidnapping, murder, assault, robbery and fraud in polygynous cultures" and going to monogamy reduces these, then I wonder what happens if we turn that dial even further? What happens when society moves towards polyandry?

Polyandry had particular high logistical costs for most of our history, because of childbirth. However, birth control technology has developed to the point where such arrangements are now practical. My current girlfriend and various women I knew in college have reported to me encounter frequencies of 3X per day during their 20's, along with their male partners at the time basically complaining of that rate being "unsustainable." It may well be possible for certain women to be able to sustain polyandrous relationships, and for them to benefit from such relationships while acting as a moderating force in society. (The "Attila" stories by Antonio Sequra and Jose Ortiz have a character who engages in this arrangement in a post apocalyptic world. In the stories, the polyandrous arrangement also serves as a small military force, highly motivated to protect its leader. These stories are probably NSFW, so no links posted here.)

Oddly enough, a there is a very "easy" legal/social framework for allowing the establishment for what is effectively a "loosely bound" polyandry: legalized prostitution. Of course, "easy" is in quotes, because, while the legal framework would be very straightforward, the political and cultural barriers to passing the enabling legislation are huge. Also, only a subset of the activity enabled by such legislation could be fairly called a "loosely bound polyandry."

EDIT: If we note the prevalent pattern of human behavior, humans are pretty much "serially monogamous" -- where our attentions are mostly, but not exclusively, given to one particular partner at a time. However, the state of nature seems to indicate a pattern of having secondary and tertiary partners or transitory dalliances as well. Given the availability of effective birth control and mechanisms for preventing the spread of sexually transmitted disease, we are probably overdue for a reshaping of societal norms to better fit the actual historical behavior of "monogamous" people.

EDIT: I was informed that polyandry was practiced, so was possible before modern birth control.
What I Discovered about Inspiration
Just like you have to kill any native app for mobile, even though a native app is obviously much more efficient. I think you are missing the point a bit... it is not about making the most performant or visually impressive thing out there. It is about how easy it is to make something that looks good, performs acceptably and runs pretty much everywhere with basically zero effort in terms of porting.
I backed a kickstarter for something like this, plus a wifi camera and laser pointer. It hasn't shipped yet, but does look like it might actually deliver (which is something for hardward KS).

http://kittyo.com/
I can't comment on MapBox's pricing as I haven't explored it yet. All I remember is that for the projects where I implemented Google maps, the pricing model wasn't sustainable for the upper bounds of projected user growth we had for it.
People do not feel a need to register and seek permission for their relationships with the church, that doesn't mean they aren't having them.

>The west has been in a soft-polygamy system since no-fault divorce was instigated.

What? Are you implying that seeking a new partner after divorce is polygamy?

>Thus, young average men enter into marriage with women assuming lifelong monogamy, and are surprised to find their wives spending time with above average men.

You're implying that only women cheat in significant numbers, which is where the misogyny accusation comes from. A quick Google shows competing statistics claiming a slight lead in both directions, which leads me to believe the infidelity rates are about equal.

If you're looking for an explanation of why civilizations that share your values are doing so well compared to everyone else, you need to first consider the hypothesis that your supposed inferiors were actually doing fine until colonial powers that share your values decided to forcefully exploit them. Moral explanations of how only societies ruled by white Christian capitalist men can ever prosper are an entire genre of pseudoscience and generally discredited in the modern world.
Yeah, I believe in system-dedicated or system-high. Physical machines dedicated to very specific tasks, all at the same level.

Virtualization is sort of at the level where you can then virtualize those dedicated machines (Qubes style), but there's an argument for dedicated $20 computers, too.
why? it is extremely annoying.

is it in the guidelines or something? i can't see anything...
Can recent Theranos controversy sway investor confidence?
It would be really nice to make a game of sorts out of it :)
I don't understand this post at all. The reason no one has built a monopoly around lists is that they are a ridiculously cheap commodity, both for the personal and network use cases.
Leaving the specific letters aside, I wonder about this comment in https://github.com/http2/http2-spec/issues/101:

"And the experimental data we have (what there is of it) suggests that we need to make this look like an unknown HTTP/1.1 method (or two)."

Anyone know what experimental data this refers to, and why this helps? This gets encapsulated inside TLS; nothing should know about it except the endpoints, both of which need to understand HTTP/2.
"High cost of living" is a concept you get to use in personal decisionmaking, but it's not a concept you get to use in probing this causation, because it becomes tautological.

High cost of living, where cost of living is mostly housing, is associated with high economic productivity combined with low housing stock. It cannot be used to normalize high salaries to some other abstract concept that says useful things about economic productivity, because it only co-occurs with high salaries.

The article is asking why city A and city B became differently economically productive, not for excuses as to why one isn't technically rich or comparisons of disposable income. That's a different discussion.
I dunno, when I look at migration data over the long term in the US, a few things stand out to me:

1. Weather is a huuuuuge factor. The large, growing population centers in the US are in warm or mild climates. Nobody wants to live in Buffalo or Minneapolis unless you're from there.

2. Location is far less important to the industries that generate the majority of value today. A lot of industrial jobs (and cities) sprung up in the midwest in the early part of the 20th century thanks to its proximity to raw materials (iron ore, coal, etc) and easily navigable waterways. That's not as important to the economy as a whole anymore, so companies have little reason to start (aka create jobs) in locations that are otherwise undesirable.

3. Given that there are fewer job opportunities that are reliant on proximity to natural resources, and that more of the new job opportunities will be located in cities with milder climates, it's no wonder that rust belt cities are bleeding people. Would you start a new business in Buffalo? Or would you just go to Chicago, New York or Philadelphia instead?
I'd recommend Critical Path and Grunch of Giants by Buckminster Fuller (1895-1983). Fuller was the former president of the Mensa society and claimed that a universal income became technically feasible in the 1970's.

Critical Path:

http://www.btronics.com/files/R.%20Buckminster%20Fuller%20-%...

>World Game makes it clear that the world electrical systems' energy-network integration and its comprehensive powering of automated, special case machinery would most effectively counter the peril of overspecialization of the humans and would introduce the omni-Universe-operative, time-energy, kilowatt-hours-per-year, commonwealth accounting system. This cosmic accounting will computer-establish the up-to-the-moment-realized cosmic-energy-income-harnessing thus far accomplished; and the technical-efficiency levels attained in the various energy-employing technologies operative around the world; and the resultant per capita individually employable world commonwealth facilities; and the per capita "consumable," "employable," and "enjoyable" "credits" in respect to any specific consumables, commodities, services, conveniences, or tools as manifest on the satellite-relay-integrated world computers and as individually called for and read out on each individual's electronic computer "credit card." The individually available information will govern the individual's design science choices of the highest relative-efficiency systems to be employed. It will also tell people whether they can do this or that, and if so, how they can go most swiftly— for instance, from New York to Australia—and will "book" a travel reservation and will prepay the bill for the travel accommodation. All such in- formation is continually computer-integrated to produce the commonwealth evaluations and their read-out-ability on world-individual's pocket-computer "credit card." These will always register the world individual's share of the ever-increasingly-employable technological savings reserves and their respective technologically operative capabilities. With humanity employing such a world-around, satellite-relayed, and world-integrated computer accounting system, the world can, overnight, physically realize the "Omnibillionaire Commonwealth" of its humans.

Grunch of Giants:

https://tripinsurancestore.com/4/grunch-of-giants.pdf

>There exists a realizable, evolutionary alternative to our being either atom-bombed into extinction or crowding ourselves off the planet. The alternative is the computer-persuadable veering of big business from its weaponry fixation to accommodation of all humanity at an aerospace level of technology, with the vastly larger, far more enduringly profitable for all, entirely new World Livingry Service Industry. It is statistically evident that the more advanced the living standard, the lower the birth rate.
I think the reason no one has nailed the distributed list making part is because that's basically email, which it's really hard to improve substantially on, it turns out.
FabScan: A 100-Euro 3D Laser Scanner
Home automation device offers plug-in apps, computer vision
> I'm not glossing over anything, I was relating my experience, and I've had very few issues.

I wasn't trying to imply you're intentionally glossing over things, just that the situation isn't as simple as your post made out.

> I don't even see what your complaints have to do with the Python2/3 transition. Python isn't a statically typed language, so obviously Python3 isn't going to fix badly written code with type errors.

Perhaps I'm wrong, but these errors only seemed to occur in 3, and I've read elsewhere it introduced additional 'hidden' type constraints.

> Regardless, if Python2 to Python3 has been a mess, clearly Perl5/6 has been an even bigger mess because they haven't even managed to release the interpreter, much less start moving to it.

Perl 6 isn't really an interpreter, and the same sort of transition is very unlikely to occur. It essentially is an entirely different language that's just very perl-y.
Yep, no collisions. The demo was made some 2-3 years ago and it surfaced here on HN yesterday for some reason. Back then we didn't have physics support in the Goo Engine. Now we have Cannon.js fully integrated into it (in fact the creator of Cannon.js works with us and has been tweaking it to work well with Goo Create and the Goo Engine).
JavaScript, APIs, and the Future of WordPress
I also started Songwriting and Jazz Improvisation, and while both had outstanding content and instruction, the peer-grading of assignments was a complete failure and forced me to quit the coursework timeline. Aside from reviewing others' work being a huge time sink, all feedback I ever got myself was completely useless, like "You did everything in the instructions, but I don't like this" or "Gee, I don't know enough to tell you how to do this any better." I would have gladly paid to get qualified feedback.
IN particular, if you know who Jonathan Mayer is, you don't have to read the article at all.

I know HN likes to keep the original title if at all possible, but pretty much every clickbait title could be profitably replaced by a clever submitter:

"FCC names Jonathan Mayer new chief technologist for enforcement"

The only other clickbait title I see right now is courtesy the Washington Post:

"This might be the most controversial theory for what’s behind the rise of ISIS"

which would be better as:

"Piketty says inequality drives terrorism"

although that doesn't quite replace reading the article, it's just a lot better than what was there.
> Possibly even more pedantic, have you noticed how, even though the authors clearly know the difference between polygyny and polygamy, they seem to somtimes use both terms interchangeably?

Bu they don't: the authors of the "Media Release", who are writing for the general public using language as familiar as possible, use the term "polygamy", but never in quotes from the authors of the study -- which always use "polygyny". The study itself always uses "polygyny" (and, at least at one point, more specifically "non-sororal polygyny"); the only times "polygamy" (or related forms like "polygamous") appear in the paper itself are in discussions of what other others studies found, one mention discussing forms of pair-bonding as "monogamous and polygamous", and in titles of works cited.
As an example, this won't run:

%hash = {key1 => 'value1'}

$hash_of_hash->{hash1} = %hash

Now, this will work (or something like it, I don't remember the syntax):

%hash = {key1 => 'value1'}

$hash_of_hash->{hash1} = \%hash

The syntax makes a lot of sense when you read the specs. It does create lots of problems when you try to create complex data structures in practice. It's also complex enough (with enough corner cases) that I can't remember it if I don't use it every week - but maybe that's just me.

By the way, I don't remember whether I must read the above structure as:

$hash_of_hash->{hash1}{key1}

or

$($hash_of_hash->{hash1}){key1}

I also don't remember if it is equal to the one you defined. I know it's in the documentation, and it's very clear there. It's just some corner case that I never bothered to memorize for any long time.