skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
You're asking for more ideas and this is something I've had to painstakingly talk to people about all day, so here's a shot at this.

First of all, identify the problem. Why are there terrorist attacks? Saying "religious nuttery" achieves nothing. Nuttery always exists but is in majority not enough to push people to suicide bombings. Terrorist attacks exist because of political power and influence. They're efficient, because we let them be efficient.

Compare it to the drug trade. [Cartels|terrorist cults] thrive because there is [money|power] to be made. Going after the [cartels|terrorists] is not enough long term. [Jailing|Discriminating against] [potheads|muslims] only serves to worsen the situation for them, pushing them even further out of society, but does nothing to solve the problem. Criminalizing the components such as [drugs|encryption] only makes the problem worse for your citizens, doesn't affect the bad guys. You need to take care of the problem at the root by removing the bad guys' incentives.

In the case of terrorist cults, religion is a mask. It's just whatever's currently marginalizing people as much as possible. You see, marginalized people make for excellent subjects. Just like any other cult, they prey on the weak. They prey on the ones who are feeling alone, those feeling rejected by everybody even their own country. Those who have nowhere else to go find a place they're taken care of, where they're cheaply promised great rewards (in the afterlife) and where they can find a purpose. Not just that, but somewhere they can take revenge on the country that hates them.

"Muslim" terrorists know quite well that their attacks only make the lives of muslims worse. They only serve to get them more subjects so they can get even more political power.

So you want an idea? You take care of that problem. You start teaching others about how those cults really work - know your enemy. You make people understand that more hatred, more blood, are exactly what the terrorists want. That's why we call them terrorists: Politics through terror.
Education. Teaching to be more critical of media - media has complete control over the narrative through most mediums, and as long as some media outlets stand to gain from instilling fear of your neighbour, they'll keep doing it and readers will not be any less impressionable for it.

I dunno, maybe it'll make a difference. Maybe it won't. I want to believe it will, but today, as a French person, I have seen more xenophobia than I care to admit. I'm hating humanity pretty badly right now. HN has been the only place where I've found mostly reasonable reactions.
This article says the tree was dead. The original says the tree was dead for two years. It is no secret that dead trees are hazardous. If you look at a tree which has been dead for years, it looks like it has been dead for years.

IANAL, so I won't discuss the law, but if I were operating that BNB, I would feel personally liable. It was a failure on their part to allow that tree to remain standing (let alone with a _swing on it_) and an ethical failure to take responsibility for other people's safety without fully understanding what was involved.

That said, it is a human error I've made myself (fortunately without fatal consequence).

I am reminded of the parable of the young reformer and the old guard politician. The reformer wants to remove a fence which is blocking a path, because it is inefficient to detour around it and he sees no use for it. The old guard says that, regardless of inefficiency, he won't allow the reformer to destroy something for which he sees no use, because it is very unlikely that their predecessors invested time, energy, and budget to just to frustrate his movements. Taking the fence down would invite unknown consequences on to his constituents.

AirBNB, Uber, and similar start ups are taking a crow bar to regulations they do not understand.
If the service provider (AirBNB host in this case) had done the repairs themselves or had let an unlicensed person work on that boiler then yes, they should be liable. If the work had been done by a licensed professional then their professional liability insurance would protect them from the fall-out of sloppy workmanship.
It seems impossible to predict what will happen.

But I don't think we will see anything that doesn't have some kind of historical precedent. The thing is that nation state is changing. It is fundamental construct of European democracy and way of life. The options seem to be EU getting more power or EU disintegrating and current nation states finding new form. Both in identity and borders. New migration period vs. formation of Austrian empire. Speed of change can of course vary.

Neither seems nice. I never guessed I'd find myself to be conservative.
Read the Quran, then comment. There's nothing about being peaceful there, Sometimes ignorance is a bliss, but definitely not in this case.
Probably not her main/only job?
Airbnb introduces 'smart pricing' to automate setting rates for hosts
> Ok. So if it indeed can be attributed to them, or if they go out and admit, then fine, send in the tanks - the Paris attack would be an act of war.

They claimed responsibility. As for sending in the tanks, I don't see that happening.

> Oh it can. We have a long way to go from what we have now to what was in USSR or Nazi Germany. I just hope we don't decide to run the distance.

Yeah, but neither were democracies. The Red Scare-era US would be a better example. I really hope it doesn't go this way.

> What worries me more is that the overrection will be aimed at immigrants and minorities who live in Europe. There already are reports of this beginning to happen.

Probably not from the government, but who knows what the population will do?
In the US it is called joint and several liability and it could result in 100% liability for all parties in the supply chain.

For example, if I purchase a defective product from a retail store and I am injured, I would be able to name the manufacturer, retailer and any other middlemen in the supply chain. If multiple parties are found to be liable, I can collect 100% from any 1 party (the deep pockets). It's not necessarily as unjust as it may sound because generally each liable party will be assigned a % of the fault/damages and the deep pockets can recoupe that from the other parties (as long as they have it, can't get blood from a stone).
Fond memories. I was working for a financial services company when we went from an IBM mainframe complex to an Amdahl one. Besides being responsible for data center automation I was facilities manager, so I was in charge of the project. It only took 3 weeks to complete the entire migration. Thank you Gene.
I just lost half an hour there... and probably some more time in the future !

Th web based game works great (and IMO the graphics are certainly polished to at least civ3 standards).
I submitted the non-paywalled article on Mashable.com here:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10565917
> That said, it is a human error I've made myself

Which is exactly why I see this as an accident. It is very easy to see a tree as something strong and capable of supporting some amount of weight because it has done so for a very long time. Even experienced woodsmen are caught unawares by trees with regularity.

A dead tree is an accident waiting to happen and any tree without leaves is one that you should not climb into or hang weight from or even walk under until you've figured out what the exact state of affairs is.
I don't quite get your point. MoarVM was created specifically for Perl 6, it is written in C and just works. JVM support in Rakudo is just added bonus and you are free to ignore it (like most users do).

For 99% users "Perl 6" will mean just "Rakudo + MoarVM" which seems to be exactly what you're asking for.

Note that MoarVM is nothing like Parrot. Parrot was a failed project which intended to bring universal VM for all dynamic languages. Obviously, too wide project scope resulted in broken and unmaintainable implementation.

MoarVM is made just for Perl 6 and intends to avoid repeating its predecessor's mistakes.
Please consider chipping in at StackExchange to help find out an answer to this. There have been a number of discussions on about how to handle obsolete answers without a clear winning idea or feature - it's a difficult topic.
The lack of stress relief which means that the cables break very quickly. It's a well known design defect in Apple products.

I'm very careful with my technology but I'm already on me 2nd MBP power supply and my wife is on her 3rd USB cable for her iPad. This all in 18 months.
That worked out great for Israel. /s
These are all good points. Thanks for your thoughtful commentary in the face of my hasty negativity. I'll stand back and see how it evolves!
I know that, but that is inconsistent and that inconsistency _is_ the reason the Finder resisted implementing it for years, and why it doesn't have cut-paste to this day, but does have move.

It is hard to find things from decades ago on the web, but see https://www.quora.com/Why-does-Apple-not-provide-a-cut-funct... (2011). The answer from Eduo-Gutiérrez IMO points to the same.

The Apple Human Interface guidelines also are fairly clear on the fact that the clipboard behaves like a real object. My 1987 edition says (page 81):

The Clipboard holds whatever is cut or copied from a document. Its contents stay intact when the user changes documents, opens a desk accessory, or leaves the application.

That certainly is not the way Excel behaves.

Also,on page 83, discussing the Cut menu item:

When the user chooses Cut, the application removes the current selection from the document and puts it in the Clipboard, replacing the Clipboard's previous contents.
[...]
If the user chooses Paste immediately after choosing Cut, the document is just as it was before the Cut.
Show HN: Record a podcast completely in the browser
Your comment tells more about your identity than anything else. Not that there is nothing really wrong with that.

Democratic state could take any stance on the subject. Probably one that is easy to sell to people. This stuff comes interesting when we have democracy and liberty fighting against each other. Which do you choose?
In case you want to show support on your website a friend made a css hack
Big cities and college towns in the US have delivery of everything. Same hours you mentioned. Some delivery til 4am.
I've really enjoyed "Search Inside Yourself," a book by the person who runs the courses at Google. It takes an engineering eye to the benefits of mindfulness.
You can also avoid reversing the arrays before reducing them by calling the method `reduceRight`.
The point is that our pensions system is crashing because people stopped making 2.2 children on average because they no longer needed children to survive in their old age. They payed their taxes so they have a guaranteed pension, right?

Wrong, those taxes were already used to pay the pensions in the same year they were collected. Now the shrinking work force is straining itself to pay for the increasing number of old farts, and the future is bleak.

We need young immigrants in Europe. We need them to work for us and make children for us. At least until they get rich and complacent like us and settle for 1 child per family.

There are ways to integrate them culturally, once their children are in our school system. And there are ways to avoid the chronic poverty and marginalization that plagues french banlieues. What we don't have is a way to keep paying those pensions with more and more pensioners leeching on fewer and fewer workers.
Typical hippie bs.

The middle east has been a mess since pretty much ever. Did the US and allies contribute to make it worse? Yup.

* Do US\UK\France <insert first world country here> intentionally strikes civilians?

* Is their objective to kill the most civilians on each strike?
In the US, property and tort law varies from state to state, but in general, for "invitees" (IE people you have explicitly invited to come into your property), you have a duty to not only repair and correct known dangers, but reasonably inspect, discover, and correct unknown dangers.

This is true even when it's not a situation where the guy paid for a rental and you put the pictures of the swing in the listing ;-)

By way of an example, here's a writeup on connecticut:

https://www.cga.ct.gov/2002/rpt/2002-R-0365.htm

"The Connecticut Supreme Court described three types of invitees.

...

2. A business invitee is someone invited to enter or remain on land for a purpose directly or indirectly connected with business dealing with the possessor of land.

...

The possessor of land owes an invitee all the duties that he owes to a licensee and also: (1) the duty to inspect the premises and erect safeguards, if necessary, to render the premises reasonably safe and (2) he has liability for defects that would ordinarily be discoverable by a reasonable inspection and he has the duty to give a proper warning. But he is not liable to anyone for unknown latent defects, that could not be discovered by the exercise of reasonable care (Conn. Law of Torts, § 49).

Even if he is an invitee, the plaintiff must prove that the defendant had notice, actual or constructive, of the specific defective condition that caused the injury, and that the condition existed for a sufficient length of time to allow the possessor, in the exercise of reasonable care, an opportunity to discover it and fix it or warn of its presence (Monahan v. Montgomery, 153 Conn. 386). The possessor of land is not liable for hazards that could not have been discovered or anticipated (Conn. Law of Torts, § 49).
"

(The usual next argument is about whether it's reasonable, could have been discovered, etc.
These are generally jury questions)
When some food has lots of sugar, you can eat less sugar (avoid excess calories) AND save money simply by eating less. Some of that saved money could be used for getting even better nutrients.

Unhealthy food being cheap is no real explanation for obesity.
Ideologies like Nationalism, Fascism are hardly "religion replacements" but genuine products of the Enlightenment. Nobody forced us to wipe out Native Americans, but there was ample rationalization from the West's most sensitive thinkers.

People HAVE committed and OFTEN commit mass shootings while shouting "For the Fatherland" or some other nationalist/racist slogan. Last I checked the body count is higher.
Can you give a more concrete example? I'm on Android, and I've never experienced that.

Your suggestion would only work for very undeterministic parts of the UI, though.

Good UIs are predictable, and sophisticated users "know" where to click and don't need to read buttons, so they're very fast. Enforcing some delay will make the system seem "laggy".

So now you have to make a distinction between "predictable parts of the UI" and "unpredictable parts of the UI" and everything's not all that simple anymore.

A better solution is to not to pop up random things at random times in random places.
Ahh. That makes sense.
i don't even understand how a false flag works in a situation like this. so 7 people people behind the false flag blew themselves up. it doesn't make sense. maybe they were promised a big christmas bonus
characterizing being raised by a jewish father as 'raised jewish' is reasonable
Aka

5. Make peace

But I forgot, that's just 'naïve'.
"What could the owner have done to ensure that this did not happen? For all we know he tried the swing himself the day before and it was fine. At least at the time of making the advert it was still fine and short of 'destructive testing' to figure out how much load it supports there is no way to know what it will handle except for trying to see if it supports your weight."

This falls into the area of "jury argument" ;-)

However, i will point out "if you can't figure out whether it's safe, you generally have a duty to remove it or warn people it's possibly not safe".

(Whether i like the law or thing it just generates tons of warning labels, that is the law).
Agreed. Sort of funny this doesn't make the top of everyone's list.
Be careful with inverse ETFs especially if they are leveraged to move 2x or 3x in the opposite direction of the underlying index. They try to be inverse for each single trading DAY so if the market moves back and forth you can take geometric losses. For instance, if you have 100 dollars in an inverse etf and the market goes up 10% your inverse etf will go down to 90 dollars. The next day the market drops 10% so you think "hey my inverse ETF will go up 10% so I'm back to where I started" Nope a 10% gain on 90 dollars puts you at 99 dollars. If the market moves sideways for a while your investment will continuously decline.
"But swings are dangerous, and users of swings should be aware of that."
Sorry, but in the US, the law and most cases say the opposite.
Generally, the onus is on the person whose swing it is, not users of swings.
Looking at those arrested for joining ISIS here in my home country I don't know how you can say that. They were not poor, they were not excluded or treated in a racist manner at all. And there are very little lines between them, men and women, from different parts of the country, from different backgrounds (semi-rural versus rural, native/non-native, dutch, french, english-speaking, rich/middle class (I'd say no poor people so far), ...).

About the only link between the ISIS members from Western Europe is that they're muslims. Even that is "not 100%" true, since there are also Christians and some Kurds traveling to Syria/Iraq. The examples of that I know went there to help, of course (medically in 2 cases, sort of an amateur doctors without borders, mostly because neither doctors without borders, nor the red cross risk sending people there, but they did have family there). Of course we don't know that's all they did. At least they're claiming to provide medical help, none of the muslims who got caught going to Syria ever even bothered to say they were going for any reason other than fighting, and some saying they went off for killing and some shit about allah.

This is a convicted ISIS terrorist that went off to kill people and came back, talking to a reporter of the public service about how and why : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yKg2UsfnxHc

Claiming that people like this are poor or treated badly by the country they were born into is moronic.

Meanwhile the tensions between (sunni) muslims and everybody, literally everybody else are rising ever more. Fights and crimes against the "natives", and every other minority, from the Jews of Antwerp to the Turks of Molenbeek (there is a large (sometimes very) atheist contingent amongst Turks).
"Swings installed by homeowners are usually held to a different standard and tree swings should be considered dangerous until personally inspected before use."

Held to a different standard by whom? Definitely not by courts.
GTK 3.18 apps native on Mir
Hmm, I haven't seen that in SF, LA or NY, but it's possible I just didn't know places delivered.
"Do you have an alternative? All I see is naïve suggestions."

Another option is to recolonize.

Failed (or failing) states like Syria and Egypt and Iraq become permanent vassal states and their populations are ruled in-place (as they were in the past).

I am not suggesting this course, but it should be included in this list, for completeness' sake.

Interestingly, it does solve the refugee crisis...
and of course the corporate media, being funded in part by hotel ads, is only too willing to publicize this.
It's completely possible that the message sent here was not aimed to anybody living in France.

It's also likely that certain large portion of French are not going to be satisfied unless something drastic is done. To them it's not about the problem, it is about feelings and identity.

So this can't be solved entirely. Best thing to mitigate the problem would be a knee-jerk reaction that does least amount of damage. Because in democracy you will have that knee-jerk, sooner or later.
I'm not 100% sure. The version from Dropbox has some differences in the Xcode project file, including a different "target version". The Dropbox version says it targets 8.0.
Really depends on what you want to know. If you are totally new to the concept of money system, YouTube videos like this one [1] (it has three parts) have the best return on your time. Politically loaded but gets basics right.

If you want very condensed crash course in investing, economics, corporate finance etc., I can recommend CFA exam preparation materials. You do not need to take exam to get them, there are plenty of used books available for sale, and you can get them on the cheap as you are not worried about them being up-to-date

[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I_x626joik0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l_IgcmsqnVM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rxZhtGeRa-M
Thanks, @dberg. Really enjoying your comments on Devmag posts. :)
This should have been placed in politics.stackexchange.com.

This isn't truly searchable by google or Bing and stack exchange is.

Can someone please move this to the better alternative?
The aritcle is just vaguely describing user experience from a "first time user" point of view, which is clearly wrong, like someone is going to throw away his idevice after his first use. As a counter-point this might be true for websites or even some kind of apps, but not really for a device that is going to be your everyday thing.

I've been a regular user of windows and linux and while back, until I switched to a Mac a while back. It took some time tinkering and reading to get used to it, but once I got the hang it has become really productive - some gestures like three finger drag, switch panes, two finger tap to double click are some time savers.

"Give me six hours to chop down a tree and I will spend the first four sharpening the axe." - Abraham Lincoln
The Math Behind the Rolling Shutter Phenomenon
> But he is not liable to anyone for unknown latent defects, that could not be discovered by the exercise of reasonable care.

And that's exactly the rub. People renting out their AirBNB properties will not study the law beforehand to establish the limits of their liability, nor will they review the entirety of their property for being safe for guests. They will go online and click a few buttons and expect some extra income from guests in their house and therefore accidents can and will happen. Nor will AirBNB send around their friendly safety inspector to make sure everything is A-OK before accepting the listing. I'm very sorry that person died but with private operators your normal expectations of service levels should go right out the window in return for a less cookie-cutter experience.

I can't see a way in which you could rule out these sort of accidents without ending up in the regular hotel business. So either AirBNB operators are hotel operators and their hosts are franchise operators and they should all just 'follow the rules' or AirBNB guests will have to take into account that they are entering an unknown private home with an unknown history of maintenance. Caveat emptor... Because in the end it is your life and the lives of your dear ones that are at risk.
Or go to the Google and ask it to find the title of the article. Click from Google and it works. FT gives away the article if you visit it from Google.
seems searchable enough: http://i.imgur.com/VwLGFxG.png
Except for the whole Muslim-cancer analogy.