skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
You simply need to be more precise with your language.

The terrorists desperately want this to be about religion. They want this to be about Muslims vs the rest. If they can make it that, if we in the west will believe that THAT is it, the terrorists can speak directly to all the 1.6 billion Muslims in the world and recruit from them. They will justify their horrible actions vs other Muslims with the reasoning that they did it for all Islam which was "threatened".

It is a political struggle within Islam. Every western nation is walking on eggshells to keep it so. Don't support the terrorists by saying "They said Allahu Akbar, it's religious".

Want to dishearten Daesh? Challenge them and spit in their face, show them their actions is for nothing? Walk with Christian if you're Muslim and a Muslim if you're a Christian (or atheist or whatever).
Shame..that they wrote it in the first place.
You can use the same end point for all possible actions on an object, instead of having to define different ones, and it standardizes which actions are available where. (Otherwise, is it /wombat/1/edit or /wombat/edit/1/ or /wombat/1/?action=edit or …)

There's no disadvantages to using HTTP verbs over anything else.

> It seems like the author's distinction between POST, PUT and PATCH seems rather arbitrary...

PATCH is… awkward, and probably should be ignored. POST always creates a new resource, under an URL picked by the server. PUT creates or updates a resource under an URL picked by the client.
Only my opinion but I'd rather be a survivor to discuss the finer points of morality later on than have the supposed moral edge right now prior to my dispatch.
That is not an answer to my question, isn't it? There are lots of islamic states where your description does not suit and they are still a mess. And being oil rich didn't pose a problem for norway.
Actually the Tensor Flow benchmarks so far have not been exiting
Looks like "opsworks" but not limited to AWS (and hopefully less frustrating). I guess this is coming from tutum who they bought recently and have been building basically the same thing. That's great, because so far I've mostly had great experiences with tutum.

Here's the blogpost announcing it: http://blog.docker.com/2015/11/dockercon-eu-2015-docker-univ...

There seem to be some features like poking running containers from the UI:

https://twitter.com/svsteenis/status/666568775672705024/phot...
>It says a lot about the mentality of the French left that calling a religion "stupid" gets you a criminal charge...

Well, in the US if it hit a wrong nerve with someone you could lose your job -- even if you said it on your personal account. Heck, it has happened for far less offensive things.

And unless you name-check God every so often, whether Republican or Democrat, you ain't getting to be President. If God "talks to you" directly, even better.
My own HP48 unfortunatley failed with a bad LCD I had to switch to emulators and now use "Droid48" for Android (https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=org.ab.x48)

For PC there is e.g. http://hp.giesselink.com/emu48.htm

Or have a look at http://www.hpcalc.org/hp48/pc/emulators for a list of different HP calculator emulators. There are other modells than the HP48 on this page too.
I think with barbaric he means to indicate they are willing to slaughter innocents. Just like the IRA was nominally Catholic and the Unionists/Loyalists were nominally protestant but in the meantime were happily bombing each others schools. Anybody serious about either religion would not bomb children, they'd be practicing a retarded barbaric version of Christianity.
Take a look at https://github.com/longsleep/adblockrouter - i hacked this together some months ago and use it since to provide DNS blacklisting to dnsmasq running on OpenWRT. If your OpenWRTC router has wget and ssl, it even runs directly on it.
They also link Anaconda in there and that should get you up and running within minutes.
A bunch of Americans think US free speech doesn't apply to hate speech. (Although I accept that they don't want to kill you for it).

A bunch of Americans think you should be killed for being black; or gay; or trans.

A bunch of Americans don't think rape is actually rape - "s/he didn't fight back!", "s/he had a beer!"

Lots of people have wrong ideas.
I disagree. The last time we tried that went horribly wrong; we watched and negotiated and "waged the war of ideology" too patiently while Hitler grew in power, until ultimately the Nazis had to be fought and slaughtered and condemned without mercy.

If history repeated itself, we would be wise to intervene faster instead of twiddling our thumbs on the sidelines. And we'd know that waging any kind of ideological war would be futile. It's almost certainly too late to solve the problem with anything other than military action.
WinX DVD Copy Pro Serial Key Crack Download
Solving the app discovery problem on Windows
I don't see why Haskell's in an awkward situation. Adding more strictness support to GHC is not particularly hard and it's happening already. It's far easier to add strictness to GHC than to launch a competitor production-strength pure functional language.

(On the long term, probably we'll see a brave new type-theoretical language, when much of the current research crystallizes into something tangible; but until then I don't see GHC being overshadowed by competitors. There is lots of inertia and the extant GHC infrastructure is extremely valuable. Dependent types are very important and adding them to GHC is very hard, but it's still happening, so Idris & co. will have a difficult time trying to fish in that pond)
Chances are overwhelmingly in favor of you being a survivor, media messages to the contrary.
> I'm Muslim and the problem is not about Islam.

Its time to get our heads out of the sand. Religion is part of the problem whether its Islam or Christianity etc. I agree other factors play a role too.

Religion is the best tool to brainwash people.
I think both sides are painting it as religion issue on purpose. You have a point about terrorists looking for recruits. But then by calling it a religious war, the West can just assume they're crazy fanatics who won't listen to reason and doesn't have to stop and consider that the other side may have some valid concerns.
What is the recent sealing?
Hey everyone, I work for nanobox and on the yoke project. I just woke up and noticed the thread. The interest is appreciated. There are a lot of great questions here, and I'll try to do my best to answer them individually. Please keep in mind that the nanopack cloud-initiative was just announced friday (https://blog.nanobox.io/nanopack-a-new-vision-for-automated-...), so we're working feverishly to get documentation, tutorials, and demos available. Any help or contributions would be greatly appreciated.
It's also hard to imagine how such killing doesn't simply fertilize the soil of radicalization.
Aren't we getting too ahead of ourselves here? It's just been released, we don't even have favorable benchmarks yet. Sure, it's by Google and lots of big names are associated with its development, but it still has to be adopted by the community and proved to be faster/easier/more flexible than Torch/Theano.
Exactly. And you tell them in no unertain terms that they are wrong, instead of making excuses because "it's their culture" or because of freedom of religion.

Harmful ideologies do not get a free pass in my book just because they claim divine backing.
The issue now is not whether Assad has committed crimes or not, that is for Syrians to decide on imho. The problem is that any criticism of foreign regime change operations (mainly led by US gov, hypocritically in the name of democracy, spending way too much money (look up US military budget) are countered with the accusation of being pro Assad. I, for one, am anti foreign regime change and have way too many things to say about Assad. There isn't that much defense that could be said for proposing that IS is nothing but an intelligence operation that got out of hand, read Operation Cyclone.
Animal rights extremists don't use religion.

Right wing extremists don't use religion.

Left wing extremists didn't use religion.

Radicalisation does not need religion.
Also, since US is a democracy, it means that the people should be able to influence this behaviour of the government, so there's some responsibility in that it did not happen.
Even without having encryption in main stream applications, like WhatsApp, it's child's play to communicate secretly. There are so many open source applications that allow you to do this, it wouldn't even be a speed bump for criminals.

Targeting main stream applications only hurts main stream users. NYT should write an article about that.
Babel is not using GitHub to track issues
What would be fair comparison is a country or region with a large Christian population that's at war or serious unrest. One country that comes to mind is Rwanda in 1994.
Yes it is scary. I believe that love conquers all fears. I do not make any pretense that some people in this world are truly my enemies. They want to destroy me and all I hold dear. These enemies do not love me, do not want to love me, do not want to understand me or know me or anything I stand for. Yet I must love them. Not just because I am commanded to. I do it because it is who I am. My very identity is tied up in my love for my fellow human being. I do not always or even often know how to love and I do not always want to love and when I do love, I do so imperfectly. It is this very struggle that is me. The fact that I struggle against hate - not the hate of others - the hate within myself, gives me something to push off of. A boundary to say this is me and this, this disregard, this alienation, this contempt, this selfishness is not.
Well, that would be kind of hostile of PyPy, I really don't see that happening.

I'm still quite curious what is your use case for PyPy where it is such a god send? I don't enjoy C, but it's just been so rare that I had to Cython or C anything, things are quite well optimized in the ecosystem.
But how long did it take for the whole of Europe to mend the damage of WWII, both physical and political? Germany has been left effectively occupied and divided for 45 years after the end of the war. We're talking about an industrialized country, which shared a very similar culture for the most part with the occupying powers. How do you think the post-WWIII would go in the Middle East? Do you think Syria will meekly accept foreign occupation, write a new constitution and rebuild itself in just 45 years?
> It's my sincerest hope that French troops will be deployed to Syria in the near future

This kind of thinking is exactly why Mid-east is in its current state and that is exactly the reason why ISIS was born.

ISIS high command mainly consists of Iraqi ex-officers, who were rendered jobless and aimless by USA's 'liberation' attempt. Al-Qaida was a result of a 'liberation' attempt by Soviets and then consequently another 'liberation' attempt by USA. Guess how the French 'liberation' will result at the end.
A link to the NYT article now redirects readers to a separate, general article on the attacks, which does not contain the word “encrypt.” The original piece can be found on the Internet Archive.

https://web.archive.org/web/20151115191248/http://www.nytime...
I will! Haha
> It has to start from the ground, with 'militant moderate Muslims' willing to show people another way; one that does not involve in slavery, beheadings, suicide bombings, and crucifixion.

Problem with this is that the most prominent moderate Islamist organization, the Muslim Brotherhood, was utterly smashed by the military counter-coup in Egypt. To many Islamists, it seemed to prove that a political route to power was untenable.

Though I agree that we have to bridge the gap. The us vs. them rhetoric is toxic.
Add invisible boobs post (to others) to your Facebook
Indeed.

I don't see anti-immigration people and Christians being asked to apologize for Breivik, nor all catholic priests being asked to distance themselves from the catholic scandal of the last decade.
Agreed. I have had many arguments with people concerning physical calculators and calculator apps. But despite what people say, they actually use apps when on the move. They may have a real calculator on their desk (i do too), but the truth is they don't want yet another gadget in their pockets to worry about.

These small RPN calculators are neat, but they fall between two goals. For a physical calculator they're a bit too small and fiddly to use. I certainly wouldn't want to program on the actual devices [although i really would like to be able to transfer programs in/out from a PC]. The size of the originals was about right - nice to handle and also pocket sized.

The other goal is portability, but in this respect they are _still_ another thing to carry. and it's not that clear whether a tiny keyboard is actually better than a large smartphone screen.

here's a plug for a calc app i wrote (sorry not RPN). It's totally free with no annoying adds (so i feel ok posting it here).

https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.voidware.r...
Reviving Smalltalk-78 [video] (2014)
If you're writing in Cython (not Python) from scratch you don't need to work any more iteratively than in any other language. You can start out with low level memory management with malloc and declare everything with C types.

Granted, generics and macros are a nice advantage of Nim. What I think is the essential difference here is that Nim is higher level than Cython. So it seems to boil down to a matter of preference. However, when Python is not fast enough, Cython lets you go all the way to generating C code without garbage collection, inline assembly etc. With Nim there's yet another layer between Python and C.
I rather think the downvoting is based on your inflammatory style, and rather baseless accusations and speculation. I downvoted you because of that, not because I'm some Haskell fanboy who can't handle critique.
I wrote a pretty long reply to your junk but in light of an exchange yesterday I will shorten it to (paraphrasing a sign over the door of a bike store where I once worked): "If you have nothing to say don't do it here".
If you accept all of the other irrational tenets of the religion, then why not accept the idea that god wants you to bomb children? And if you believe that's really what god wants, then who are you to refuse?
Hello. I really like your honesty, courage and passion that I can sense from what you wrote. I don't want to sound offending, but you are saying that you are happy to discuss this and I have almost no contact with deep religious persons that are in IT, so I have a couple of questions.

1. Where is the boundary of your beliefs? I'm always trying to be polite with my dev co-workers, but for example if I write a flagged variable `$bible = false;` somewhere in my code, would you feel offended?

2. How do you mix the very science-based nature of IT with purely non-scientific phenomenon of religion?

3. Do you accept all scientifically proofed facts as true, that contradict ( might contradict ) your religious views? Like evolution of homo-sapiens, big bang, etc.

4. Do you accept all historically proofed facts as true, that contradict ( might contradict ) your religious views? Like politics behind let's say writing the bible, purpose of the religion and use as a tool of manipulation.

Again really sorry if my questions sound offending not only to you, but to anyone else who reads this.
Up until a few weeks ago I used to think that religion is just a facade, but I no longer think that is true. Religion is the center of their beliefs, and a very important factor that drives their actions. When the Boston bomber says "Know you are fighting men who look into the barrel of your gun and see heaven, how can you compete with that?" he is not lying. This is what these people truly believe. They think the metaphysics of this universe works as follows. You walk into a theatre full of people with an assault rifle and start shooting people. This ensures your place in heaven next to God. Then you press the button on your suicide vest to teleport into heaven. Imagine that you were living in the Matrix but instead of a telephone, death is what lets you out of the Matrix. Furthermore, outside of the Matrix there is somebody who has been keeping score and this makes the difference between eternal bliss or eternal torture. The robots that run the Matrix have really engineered the world that way. This is what these people believe, or at least a medieval version of it.

Another example is the Heaven's Gate suicide cult. Instead of being based on Islam they were based on Christianity. They though that Jesus was an alien and you can reach their UFO (= heaven) by committing suicide. And they did.
Encryption existing is an important part of not being in a police state. It's the freedom to not have the gouvernment judge your every word, be it with an algorithm or by being able to look up your every word without a warrant in an investigation, without civil transparancy.
But I would hope you'd still think that death threats over it are utterly ridiculous, and unacceptable?
People will believe whatever it is that they want to believe, religious texts can be twisted to support just about any position, or the opposite to that position.
Move over 3D Touch, angular finger sensing is what’s next
Email Is the Best Way to Reach Millennials
The best encryption is simply to communicate the old fashioned way. Just because they had some playstations and access to "whatsapp" does not mean the terrorist trusted electronic devices.
How We Made LogDog’s Traffic Explode by 700% Using Inbound Marketing and SEO
The article is a nuanced view of the present situation, but doesn't go into the historical perspective. Contemporary radical Islam is a response to Western modernity and perceived decadence and has been brewing for decades if not centuries. It is an outgrowth of Salafi Islam, a severely literal interpretation of the Koran that has become widespread over the past 70 years thanks to trillions of petrodollars that fund thousands of fundamentalist madrassas and other cultural dissemination centers all over the world, including in the United States and Western Europe.

It's important to note that ISIS, al Qaeda, al nusra etc. are Sunni movements and are bitterly opposed to Shi'ism. The rise of Shi'a political power, led by Iran since 1980, poses a huge ideological threat.

What we're seeing today is a tiny group of very clever, highly motivated people, patiently watching for opportunities to sow chaos because they believe it will tip the scales eventually toward a Caliphate. They are hugely aided by technology and by the West's earnest desire to integrate the East.

However, I believe the ISIS is doomed to failure. There are only so many young people willing to sacrifice everything for fanatic dreams of afterlife fulfillment as payment for promises of improving the here-now. Most youth, in other words, aren't that stupid. ISIS is siphoning off a certain kind of malcontents who make good fodder for the cannons, but history has shown that this approach is not sustainable. The Muslim world is already showing signs of backlash against the constant images of extreme violence, and reformists continue to call for tolerance and dialogue as the only true solution to territorial and ideological differences.

Whether the Levant succumbs to unending civil war for the next few decades, or is ultimately dominated by a set of secular dictatorships that suppress the jihadists, or can they achieve peaceful multiplayer democracy--these are questions to which no one has the answers.
Well technically the answer to your question is yes, I have thought about it. Which I did mention. Mixing politics and religion allows a faster decline into partisanship than even my country has seen. Religious leaders are often chosen for their devoutness and if they also have political clout like many Muslim clerics then it is a problem. I agree with you.
I really hate that Pew Survey. It polls people from some of the most culturally conservative countries and then uses that to make assertions about Islam.

I wish Pew had interviewed Christians in the same countries at the same time and asked them what they thought should be done to homosexuals.

It would be interesting to see what we could glean about Christianity.
At the risk of putting words into other someone else's mouth, it's a shame that the level of education/awareness regarding the fundamentals of how society works is so lacking.

Without encryption, internet doesn't work. Without internet, banking and e-commerce doesn't work. Really, not a single user-identifying service can function without encryption.

Also, encryption is based on math and logic. You can't really prohibit people from using it, or having it in any sensible way. Meaning that if we live in a fantasy land where this became outlawed, you'd still have any two nodes using encryption should they wish to. I doubt terrorist have the necessary incentive to follow international laws.

In fact, a mathematically unbreakable encryption is simply generating random data (aka. a one-time pad https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/One-time_pad), and having a copy of this data at each end of the communication. Want to transfer sensitive data across the border? Just xor your data with the random data, and take the random data with you across the border. If the microSD card didn't leave your butt-crack at any point, you can merrily download the xor-ed data through NSA's mainframe, and they can't do jack about it, even with quantum computing, or any imaginable alien technology.
Introducing Git fastclone
It was 65k from both of his games combined though.

You have to also consider that his games have been featured on the app store multiple times - and he's not even making that much. It's a risky path, but it can pay off if you work hard and are smart about it (e.g. I'd try to build communities around my games that I could get to play my next games as well, immediately getting them up from the bottom of the app store where nobody goes).
In Paris, car accidents: 39 deaths/year, homicides: 101/year, and Terrorism more than 147/year. Tobacco is a personal responsibilities problem and a life reducer more than a killer. If find those kind a comparison stupid because you don't even account for externalities and the fact that terrorism has more impact on social fabric than anything else.

If we speak only about economy, terrorism in Paris could make France loose several point of PIB, we are extremely reliant on tourism, this absolutely dwarf any foreign operation.
> Beyond the complete lack of humanity in the outlook that we are like barrels of brent, it's simply wrong.

Indeed. And there seems, to me, to be something nihilistic in the idea that Europeans should simply let immigrants replace them. Maybe instead, European nations should look into instituting domestic policies that encourage the population to maintain a healthy replacement rate.

The article appears to be implying that Western nations should not make war against Daesh because "that's what they want." Well, the status quo of surveillance, arrests, and half-hearted airstrikes isn't stopping them. There seems something profoundly suciidally nihilistic in the idea that Europe should simply do nothing different and simply be more and more welcoming as attacks happen in an attempt to appease extremists until at last Europe is no longer populated by Europeans.

On the timescale of centuries and millenia, it's amazing how little has changed in the past thousand years. This could be just another couple chapters in Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire. (Which, for those who don't know, covers mostly in later chapters the European nations and the various Muslim empires.)