skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I don't think I'm disconnected, do you have proof that this is indeed a problem? In fact, I can easily find connections that I like online, for example, deviantart is where I find connections with artists I like.

And the process of finding connections is really cheap, all I need to do is peeking at the hottest art submissions and clicking into the artist's page. Only few seconds to build up a new connection vs watching 5 min video of a stranger that I'm not interested.

the skate girl video, for example, doesn't interest me. If I were really interested in this topic, a simple youtube search gave way more content to follow: https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=skateboard+awes...

honestly, I also easily get aesthetic fatigue with the style too. the videos are of good quality for sure, but after watching few of them, I can't remember who they are anymore.
Whilst I'm happily a Christian, I've always believed the same about that KJV mishap, somebody somewhere did something wrong. They are mere men after all.
Keepass2Android does exactly that, and additionally auto-fills password and confirmation fields when you focus them with the custom keyboard active. Very handy.

(https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=keepass2androi...)
Russia and Europe to launch base-building mission to dark side of Moon
On OS X, how will these components interact with the accessibility features?
> CONDUCT.md

Did projects prior to being hosted on GitHub require a Code of Conduct or is that a new thing.
This is actually a battle that will soon merge with the primary frontline of the War Against General-Purpose Computing[0]. Windows 8 already has some things that you can't do without restarting and going through scary recovery screen with additional layers of security - in particular, installing unsigned device drivers. I predict the gap will close from both software and hardware side as Trusted Computing starts getting popular, finally sealing your fate as a leaser of computing device, not the owner.

[0] - It's not really "coming" anymore.
great idea. How do you see this scaling for commercial usage?
Drones, Spyware, and the Vallejo Kidnappings
Yep, Adventure Capitalist was my inspiration, I was addicted to the game a few months ago and thought it would be nice to do it with real estate. And to challenge my coding skills as well.

I will improve boom/bust soon.
Time to get your new Office prompt does not upgrade or work
Yes, it does. But that rarely happens. Why is that?

There's something with web/mobile that makes people afraid to do anything without sandboxing the living hell out of every app, even though we've managed to live with unsandboxed desktops without many such incidents. I can't exactly put my finger on what is going wrong (it has definitely something to do with installing random crap and the new business model of companies trying to monetize user's eyeballs and data), but the push towards sandboxing is a symptom of that problem.
> As a desktop user I need little to none scrtuiny. My web browser, IDE, toolchains, IM, video player and computer games all work together well and while technically any one could own any other, this simply does not happen. It takes some (little) skill to avoid obvious malware, and then generally you're fine.

It's not just downloading malware that is an issue; you also have to worry about security flaws in the apps you trust. Web browsers are a perfect example; they are constantly downloading untrusted code and executing it. Even when the javascript engine doesn't have a flaw, you have exploits like Rowhammer.js[1] which sidestep them entirely.

> It takes some (little) skill to avoid obvious malware, and then generally you're fine.

I think you're underestimating the knowledge needed to secure your computer properly, and overestimating the savy of the majority of users. The current state of computer security (huge botnets, etc.) is a testament to the fact that the current model isn't cutting it.

> On the other hand, I get to open my video file in my IDE, edit IM's data files in a word processor, and move things around seamlessly with OS; everything is expected to work and no program tries to lock me in.

If the lock in is an open file dialog, or passing a filename by command line, all of the examples you list would work fine.

> Desktop environments don't need that much sandboxing because there isn't that much crap going on.

You are missing an important difference; most users are far more liberal in downloading apps for mobile than for desktop, and if they were just as liberal on their desktops they would be pretty much guaranteed to get malware. Because of this, many apps which are only used in a browser on a computer are used as apps on mobile (which is needed at the very least for performance reasons). Sandboxes aren't perfect, but they move the ability to infect a device via installation from "totally trivial" to "requiring significant vulnerability".

[1]: https://github.com/IAIK/rowhammerjs
Well, true, we did get spam attacks on the app, so I wound up banning huge swaths of the world. I moved SSH to a very high port, only ran apache, sshd, and an SMTP agent (the machine never received email, inbound was handled by GMail). Still, had someone wanted to exploit the PHP app, I'd be surprised if they couldn't find a weakness. It was custom written, but nearly a decade age.
Also a Froala user, been using CKEDITOR before but switched since Froala worked better and had a simpler API.
Agreed, it's not really fair of me to single out Apple for criticism. I was just reaching for a recent example of something that can't possibly be justified on any grounds other than the usual "For the children" and "For the OS vendor."
This struck me as surprising as well. I personally find not making a big deal out of shared expenses much more freeing to the mind than keeping track of it. I do this with friends as well as SOs; my philosophy is that it all evens out, somewhere. But... different strokes for different folks, I guess.

Regardless, this is just so adorably nerdy. Or nerdily adorable. Either way.
1Password has a TTL setting to clear passwords copied to clipboards. They've thought this through. Kudos.
Once they close that particular gap, I'm guessing we'll still be able to use a debugger to get the job done...

Not if the Trusted Computing Group has their way; it's already happening with things like Secure Boot. Hopefully things will change for the better, before we get to outlawing debuggers[1]...

[1] http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.en.html
Not OP either but:

If you want to read the Bible smoothly there's the NLT (New Living Translation) reads very nicely for today's day and age. There's different translations for different purposes, I enjoy reading many of them. If you want to read the New Testament from a different source (most translations use Greek) there is Aramaic New Testament in Plain English (from the Peshitta Script written in Aramaic) which clears up some confusing verses in the New Testament. Such as the famous camel through the eye of a needle becomes a rope passing through the eye of a needle which reads clearer.
It does not serve C++ well. Many programmers try to minimize dependencies, because having dependencies is hard to deal with. If you need a specific version for instance, you can't rely on the OS's packaging.
18 John Maxwell Quotes That’ll Inspire Your Inner Leader
"Suppose it definitely was the first KJB, and said something that strongly contradicted modern theology. Wouldn't modern theocrats just ignore or discredit it?"

Only a minority of a minority of English-speaking Christians regard the KJV as having any particular authority. For most of us it's a historical translation that is culturally, and sometimes sentimentally, important.

But I doubt even KJV-inerrantists would regard a draft as authoritative. And that's what makes this document interesting -- it's a draft; we have early editions of the KJV, but surprisingly few of the translators' notes.
I'd prefer docs. And please: PEPs are NOT docs!

In the last couple of years setuptools changed / broke so many things that previously worked without documenting anything. Even trying to figure out what the relevant docs would be, and who maintains them is hard. As Nick Coghlan mentions in the comments: Even the people maintaining this stuff have no idea what it all does.

And still, the correct (but incredibly boring and frustrating) solution is for someone to sit down and figure this stuff out and document it. Definitely not me though. :)
The History of San Francisco's Water System [pdf]
Prepend "Show HN: " to your title, I believe.
They don't require it, it's just encouraged.
There was much less time for losing Tolkien's work
No summary or contract is trustworthy, so no, they shouldn't trust it. Trust is between parties, not between papers. It's more of a shortcut and guide. If there's something in the summary that's a red flag, well we just saved a lot of time by finding the matter fast. If not, then we should have a good idea what's in the contract, and if that contract significantly differs from the summary, then the party isn't trustworthy. It's much easier to read a contract with an idea of what it's supposed to say, than going in blind. With the summary, your mind is more focused on "is X true or false" rather than determine what it says, THEN see if the details are kosher.
Except that they (non-KJV) are all copyrighted and thus you better not get caught reading them out loud in public or cutting and pasting quotes online.

I agree, the KJV is not the easiest to read and a new Christian might want to start on something a little easier. But it is my advice that one hopefully outgrow the easier version as quick as possible.

The KJV authors were genuine people as well. They were not bent on making a name for themselves which is what the basis for every modern translation is (other than money).

I disagree that new translations are somehow "more accurate". From a handful of older manuscripts, that disagree not only with the originals used in the KJV but they also disagree amongst themselves, we get a hodgepodge of missing sentence fragments, and re-wordings that for what ever reason where backported into the Nestle greek from which most modern translations are derived. There are plenty of books written on the topic, the most recent being: http://amzn.com/B00KTV5GM2 (note I am not advocating any particular one,nor have I read any. What I speak of is from my own personal study).

And the worst thing of all is none of the "modern bible" movements were ever lead by Christians. It was the complete opposite; lead by secularists and skeptics alike who's only goal seemed to be how many verses they could get away with removing. Verses were never added, only removed.

In the end, there was no reason for the Christian community to be involved in this. The Christians already had a bible that had proved itself to be trustworthy and well liked.

"Yea, hath God said?"
--Satan, Genesis 3:1
And then you have to deal with null pointers.
Starts trollish. Does it get less so?
Firstly, this notebook contains the translation for 1 book, and the partial translation of another, neither of which are considered "scripture" by most protestant Christians.

The Roman Catholic and Eastern Orthodox churches have never had any particular connection to the King James bible, so there are very few churches that use (or previously used) these particular books from the King James version. Hence, it is hard to imagine that anything that would found in this notebook would be of particular theological relevance to almost anyone.

That said, if someone were to find a similar notebook for a "mainstream" book, it would still be of only minor consequence.

Even within strongly evangelical protestant churches, there is not a lot of specific theological reverence for the King James Bible. It was a remarkable achievement and did a lot to aid in the accessibility and spread of the bible in Western Europe and the colonies, but it is - in most churches - viewed as simply another translation. It was done by good people with the best of intentions, using the best manuscripts and technique available to them at the time, but that does not make it perfect, nor does it make it "scripture" in a way that another translation isn't.

We know what source material they used, and we know what they produced as output. These notebooks help understand the process by which they did that, but that's more of historical interest than anything else.

Plenty of people have undertaken the process of comparing the source material with the KJV output, so that the christian church is well aware of the relative strengths and weaknesses of that translation.

It is discovery of early source material that has the potential to cause ripples in modern christian theology - the discovery of the dead sea scrolls had a far bigger impact on modern bible translations than any KJV notebooks ever could.

There are a small number of Christian churches who believe that the KJV is "the true bible". If we found that the draft versions of the bible were greatly different than the final version, that might cause some angst for them, but generally their views are based on a form of the idea that "God protected his church by providing this bible translation" so they would simply accept that God was at working directing the translators to reject the draft version and accept the final version.
I don't know what my second wish will be, but I can tell you my third will be "I wish I had a monkey paw."

http://www.hulu.com/watch/33690
Open source would be great! Sounds like you've already got some prospective contributors out there, and an open source project will naturally be easier to market to GitHub users.
Butler boom? Jeeves has arrived in China
No, because the signatory parties are still responsible for knowing what their signing anyway. If the summary was significantly different than the contents, then one MIGHT have an argument a judge could agree with, but in general, if you sign it, then you better have read it because you agreed to it, summary or no.
And easily demonstrably useful.
Cool. So what are the notes around John 10:36 say? That's always been a pretty contentious adding of a, "the" in there.
Thanks for the link! That's actually displaying corerctly. You can drag your snippet by clicking and holding it on this icon. Here's a demo: https://twitter.com/rawcodeio/status/655678301617438721
This is actually not the whole story. WinZip archives can be encrypted like you describe, but they can also be created with both the data and the list of contents encrypted.
First paragraph of the article.

"The King James Bible is the most widely read work in English literature, a masterpiece of translation whose stately cadences and transcendent phrases have long been seen, even by secular readers, as having emerged from a kind of collective divine inspiration"

From https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Tyndale
"In 1611 the 54 scholars who produced the King James Bible drew significantly from Tyndale, as well as from translations that descended from his. One estimate suggests the New Testament in the King James Version is 83% Tyndale's and the Old Testament 76%."
> Yes, that's what I meant by "nonstandard."

It's slightly more difficult than turning of UAC on Windows. In addition, they didn't even try to hide the ability to turn it off; it's available in the documentation [1].

The only way they could seal the more difficult workaround I detailed above would be to either:

1. Rewrite their kernel so they don't have to open source it. In this case, I have no doubt the Hackinitosh community will have a patched version within a week. Goalposts moved I guess. Note you can still edit those files by restarting in another OS, which shouldn't be a problem for anyone who knows enough that they should be messing with such things.

2. Modify the hardware so it can only boot signed OS X. At this point, SIP is pretty irrelevant to the issue, and there doesn't seem to be any strategic advantage in even having it.

Also, I'm not sure what the motive is here. I can still install and run whatever binaries I want, signed or otherwise. I have El Capitan and I'm even using a custom shell. If Apple planned to require signatures for even command line programs to further their evil anti-Turing plan, SIP would again become irrelevant. So what slippery slope are we sliding down?

[1]: https://developer.apple.com/library/watchos/documentation/Se...
"Only" 2x ? That's 250.000 people more. One human life is too much.
I didn't read it as singling out Apple, just wanted to share another example that you may not have heard of and that I remember vividly, after losing some time and patience trying to program a TI Stellaris LM4F120 using a Windows 8 laptop.
Definitely a learning experience.

I have built Iceape on gNewSense linux on an X60 and I can say that under linux you need at least 20Gb of space and 6 hours on the core-duo with 2Gb RAM.

I always plan on a throw-away install when first playing with an operating system and repeat the install when I know what the 'rules' are. I shall be encrypting my /home just for peace of mind if I leave the laptop on the bus, so that is another thing to research.
Seems a shame to couple a widget designer to a particular backend technology.
When Its Time to Pull the Plug
Yep! It was indeed. That was using one of the 5 themes, "Hyde".
I agree. This is much the same as Shakespeare's plays having more impact due to their archaic language. I have seen several of his plays both in modern and original form. I thought the originals would be impossible to understand. Interestingly enough, after a few minutes, not only was I able to follow along, I enjoyed hearing my mother tongue with a strange twist. It gave the work much more impact.

Along those lines, from a literary and cultural perspective, I think most folks who want to participate in English-speaking nations would be good to have a solid literary background in the KJV. There's just too much allusion and metaphor scattered about to forgo it. There are also a bunch of second-tier texts to know, but as far as cultural impact, as far as I can see, the KSV is way out ahead of the rest.

I do not know if the same can be said of the Bhagavad Gita and Indian culture, although from what I can tell, the Koran plays a huge role in many other societies. Understanding mythical and mystical works gives interlocutors a huge common metaphorical and allegorical reserve that just isn't possible without them.
Agree. Although I would have wished to see it in action immediately (on an example page) without having to clone it to my machine.

Edit: Nevermind, just saw the edit on the comment below :)
Here’s a real reactive-native for desktop OS X Cocoa I found:

https://github.com/ptmt/react-native-desktop

Currently just "hacking weekend" level maturity.
https://github.com/facebook/react-native/issues/247#issuecom...

I have never actually tried it, but this one is real native controls. It’s on my TODO list…
"Atheist Hitchens Praises King James Bible"
http://www.christianpost.com/news/atheist-hitchens-praises-k...

>"Hitchens called the contemporary version "pancake-flat" and more suited for 'a basement meeting of A.A.'"
> installing unsigned device drivers

So, probably one of the most dangerous things you can do (opening the door to rootkits and an infected BIOS) doesn't take just a click and an undistinguished warning dialog? Also, this has been around since at least Windows 7, its not evidence of us sliding down a slope.
How to extract PIN from any selfie, is biometrics secure?
And there’s nothin’ short of dyin’, half as lonesome as the sound,
Of the sleepin’ city sidewalk and Sunday mornin’ comin’ down – Kris Kristofferson
I would guess that it does not interact with accessibility now.

These components are just bunch of styles to make it look like a 'native' widget, though it's not a real native widget of OS.

Though, it leaves me with a question, how can you set up OS X accessibility features, in your web app/UI, that it could be used by OS X? I would guess you can't, and it's all left to the browser.
I'm asking what the consensus is. In fact this is the first I've heard of the Microsoft offering.
Basic current assumptions (approximate):

- Boom 10 years - Recession 5 years

- Initial property price, rounded current price in city center for 2bdr in each city. Hong Kong is a little bit too expensive but I currently live there and it's so expensive that it had to be exagerated.

- The 20% you need to buy and 40 year mortgage is how the property sector was working until 2008 in my hometown, Barcelona, before the recession.

- Mortgage rate is 3%

- Rent you receive is around 7% of property value annually

- Inflation is +4% annually during boom and -6% during recession

- Savings return is around 1% annually

- owned property devaluation happens during 15 years until it reaches a minimum and then keeps up with recession/boom cycles
Razuna 1.8 RC1 (Release Candidate) Is Ready Open Source Digital Asset Mangement
It is not "significant" because the KJV text has not changed (other than grammar or spelling) in 400 years. The KJV was translated from known sources. The only clues to be found in old KJV stuff would be how the overall translation process was laid out (which is what the article talks about)
Why would that have annoyed Tolkien? He was Roman Catholic, and KJV is a protestant translation.
It's worth bearing in mind that the Rump Xen backend isn't well optimised at the moment, so there's quite a bit of low hanging fruit that could probably boost performance quite a lot. I think things like multi-page netfront, more careful rx/tx batching, and probably scheduler measurements will have an impact. The focus right now is on getting the individual applications to run reliably and robustly as unikernels when recompiled under Rump, and upstreaming patches where applicable.
On an Android, it does not let me select text (there is only one caret during edit). Is there some workaround / way to fix this?
Here's a link to the video that this article pretty much summarized [0]

[0] https://youtu.be/Mjx3S3UjmnA
Right, it is considered to be a flavor of Unix. But OS X has nothing to do with Linux other than a common ancestor.
Similar discussion about this in reference to:

http://www.salon.com/2015/08/09/meritocracy_is_a_massive_lie...
Ask HN: What are some resources for learning about finance terms for startup CEOs
There are a ton of terms, jargon that investors, journalists or people in the startup industry throw about like GMV, LOI, Pre money etc., Are there books/primers/links/articles that explain all of these, what they mean, and how to use them ?
The sad truth seems to be that there is no other business model for download sites. Maybe we should really improve micro payments to be able to pay for good services.
Deconstructing the CAP Theorem for CM and DevOps (2013)
What about syndicates becoming big enough to replace Series A (and maybe even Series B) rounds? An old angel investment was ~$300k, now it's $3m, and Series As have become $6-10m. It seems likely that more angel money means larger rounds, and that they could reach $6m regularly soon!
Sandbox all you want but give me root level access then. Notepad++ may not need the GPS or Internet access[0], but I need it to be able to edit Visual Studio's config files when I ask it to, without having to ask VS for permission. Don't let programs have magic databases that are inaccessible by users.

OS X solves this quite elegantly. If an application is sandboxed, it cannot access files outside the sandbox directly. However, when an Open (or Save) dialog is requested, it is handled by a privileged daemon outside the process (it used to be pboxd). This daemon then makes the file or directory available in the sandbox after selection.

You still get app isolation, but it does not impede the user experience. (Of course, it does not apply for every scenario, but sandboxing is not a requirement outside the App store.)
OS X is built around the XNU kernel. XNU stands for "X is Not UNIX" so that's a clue :-)