skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> You'll lose weight on a calorie restricted diet almost no matter what you eat.

The problem is, a calorie restricted diet alone isn't always sustainable. Eg if you're eating crap, but so little that you don't gain weight, it's still going to mess you up (lethargy, irritability, lack of focus).
- has Windows ;-)
AFAIK, JuiceSSH is still closed-source, which means I and a lot of others won't be using it. AFAIK, there's no good ssh clients for android, only tolerable ones.

I'd love to be proven wrong about that though.
Interesting blogpost: http://blogs.perl.org/users/leon_timmermans/2015/08/fileslur...
Then post your name and address.
Regulation would help as well, similar to how many states have outlawed plastic beads that were used as exfoliators in body care products (those plastic beads never biodegrade, and were polluting bodies of water).

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/california-plastic-micro...
My source is me having found two victims of GHB poising in the gutter, quite literally.

The girl had previous (voluntary) experience with the drug and managed to lock herself in the toilet before passing out. I found her with with several bruises over her face after we broke down the door. The guy was beaten, robbed and left in a bush and that's were we found him. Because I served both their drinks over the night I knew they didn't consume 'too much' alcohol, the girl claimed she could tell the GHB from both the smell(?) of her drink and effect it had on her.
Also it has Windows 10 instead of OS X, and probably worse touchpad (because so far, nobody else has gotten it right)
If it works anything like the backscatter machines the TSA was using (rapidly moving beam), a failure mode like what I mentioned is definitely enough to be dangerous. There was a physics professor from Arizona state who said that the TSA machines could even cause radiation burns if the fail-safes failed and the beam kept going while stuck in one position.

It many not work that way though. Who knows? That's the problem with being secretive about the whole thing. They don't publicly release data on potential malfunctions.

One of my biggest concerns is the amount of training the operators receive on recognizing and reporting potential malfunctions. I suspect it's not sufficient, but again who knows? They won't talk about it because terrorists.
Oh yeah, I'm with you completely. I trust that he will stay impartial, and I hope that vendors allow him the freedom to write as he has in the past so that all appearances reflect what I believe to be is the reality.
He is discussing it and contributes the fact that this has been going on for some time without any push to shut down the discussion or to decrease your concern. It's simply a fact added to the pile.
This isn't really a Docker thing though, is it? It is talking about the case of a program that includes its dependencies in its own source code tree. I think docker-ized programs would still link against e.g. the system libssl rather than ship a copy of an ssl library with a program's source. Another term sometimes used is "vendoring".

A lot of Java programs ship jar files in their source tarballs, it has traditionally been a lot of work for Debian devs to pick these apart. Similarly, many "things" (programs or web services) that use javascript libraries often ship minified versions of common stuff like jquery rather than use the system version. It's quite a mess. I think a lot of it stems from the fact that traditionally these sorts of libraries (jars, javascript) have not been well packaged or even packaged at all. The program authors are making life easier for the majority by shipping all the deps together. It's not good for distros, but I can see the advantage.

I think subversion has a nice work around for this - they include a script to download the dependencies if you need them, otherwise the default is to link vs system deps.
A potato.
Fellow skinny guy here who's working my way out of it. I don't know if you relate to this, but when I used to eat french fries and fast food, I would have bouts of lethargy and mental dullness. I just sort of thought that's how life is. When I started eating healthier, I enjoy much better mental clarity. It's a world of difference, and it gives me 2-5x more quality time to do my best work.
I LOVED the Orangey-Brown colour scheme so much that I went straight to the BMW website to see if it was really an option that you can buy. Sadly, it's not. /sadface
Quality sleep is a good enough reason for me to have available sugars while sleeping.

I rest my best after a nice dinner, whereas skipping it means that I'll take longer to fall sleep and more often than not end up waking up way earlier than I should.
Compare the second part you say to the following:

>IF I come and creep you out, stalk you, threaten harm to you and your family, maybe you should just change name and location, and go live in a different state.

Pre-empting the 'but this is internet, just stop looking at it', argument:

Essentially, how is it different from "if X group of people doesn't want to be harassed, they should just avoid their harassers, and not go to where they are". Replace the "X" with women, or persons of any race.
No. Look, anonymity is a wonderful thing.

Candide, The Silence Dogood Letters, even The Mill on the Floss wouldn't have been written had the authors had to use their real names. Way too many examples to count. Hard to imagine the Revolutionary war getting as much support state-side as quickly as it did without Common Sense, which was published anonymously. So you can probably say, "Without anonymity you wouldn't be in America."

Whatever the problem, the solution should just about never be "get rid of freedom." Having some sort of NSA-approved sign-on for the internet (AKA Facebook) would be horrible. Read 1984, or Fahrenheit 451, or any other book against authoritarianism. First you make a list, then you analyze, then you start crossing people off it...
> There's nothing we can do

Yes there is, the first thing would be to not attempt to dismiss it

> "of course there will be some bad apples."

Or to victim blame

> Perhaps people facing consistent harassment like this should try something similar?

People facing similar harassment are all women, telling them to hide certainly isnt the answer

(apologies, was supposed to be a reply to https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10425590, I cant internet)
I think that that certain US government grant money prevents full copyright assignment. These professors are probably fully within their rights to self host copies of their work. This is why I said sometimes legal and sometimes a grey area..
everyone?
Why I like Hapi more than Express
Speaking about drinks (not just sugary) with the food - I was taught as a child not to do that and chew my food instead of washing it down with a drink. I imagine you can eat much more this way but, otherwise, this seems to be a harmful habit to me.
Why does the “can you fix my computer” piss off Computer Science people so much?
Feels realtime on iOS (iPhone 6) and would be great as part of a 'configure your car' tool on a dealer website.
6000 kcal of peanut butter is about 1kg. I'd be tempted to pay to see you do that.

But how much you are able to stuff yourself with isn't the full story without knowing how long it takes you to get hungry again.
Personally: ConnectBot has weird formatting issues, problems with keyboard input, and doesn't play nice with tmux.

Ultimately it's what I use because it's the most tolerable, but I've yet to find a good Android ssh client.
Sounds like it is time to buy a printer, rip it apart and document the firmware after reverse assembling it.
You are absolutely right, and perhaps the most under reported effect of the war on any vice is that vice enforcement becomes just as lucrative. It's easier to bust someone for possession than reckless driving, assault, you know, things that have to be verified at the time of offense. It's not that the police, prosecutors, prison owners or lawmakers are bad people, they just deal with corrosive incentives. Just like drugs, drug crime enforcement is a cheap high that gets you to places you wouldn't likely be if you played by the boring rules.
I believe that the average person cannot see themselves getting into any legal trouble for the EULA that they've agreed to. Lawsuits and trials are something that happens between corporations, among business people, and with criminals. It is not common to hear of the average person in trouble for violating an EULA for something that was thought to be permissible.

Although I don't agree with blindly accepting terms, the current precedent is that if you upload something somewhere, buy something, etc., you'll retain access to it as long as you are in accordance with the law. The company will notify you in the event that they are shutting down or if you'll need to take action to retain access/ownership. There are exception to this rule (does Mt. Gox qualify?), but common sense generally applies to EULAs. Should companies start cashing in on the public's willful ignorance, then people will start to panic.
This renders fine on my Linux machine with integrated graphics (chromium).

An occasional hanging frame, but nothing serious.
> Did cavemen make bread?

Yes.

http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/observations/humans-feas...
This is a phenomenon I see a lot on social media honestly.

Go to any tweet of Emma Watson and try to read the replies without cringing. It's sobering enough to never, ever, ever! wish fame on anybody you love, let alone yourself.

The internet is a platform of speech for all with no restriction and it only takes 0.01% of the crazy, batshit or just fanatical people to make it seem like there is no hope for humanity.

I feel bad for her, being a female may make you feel somewhat less secure (I can't speak for woman-kind so I could be way off base), while male stars get the same kind of treatment- they're more likely to feel pretty sure that they can fend off any depraved attack when their body guards are not around.

For people that are not super rich but have a reasonable amount of spotlight, this can be the worst of both worlds.
>> after the acquisition doesn't pan out.

Considering that this is common , one wonders - wouldn't it be better investing the $19 billion in innovation, even if in non-related fields ?
>That's exactly how people defending "righteous causes" end up being trolls and harassers themselves.

When one misuses their abilities to harass/intimidate others, some of their liberty should be taken away, wouldn't you agree?
I am in no way related to this but have you tried https://www.noom.com/ ?

It not only helps in counting calories it also gives daily articles and a set of TO-DOs. I was 275 lbs around 2.5 months ago but since then have lost 22 lbs.

Regarding 'keeping the weight down', I learned from this app itself why it is difficult:

1. Not eating anything for a week is not only a bad strategy to lose weight it is actually a good strategy to gain weight afterwards. In my own experience whenever I tried to lose weight by eating less I lost a lot of weight but gained more than what I lost afterwards. You cannot stay hungry forever and if you lose more than 2 lbs per week your body goes into starvation mode, burning any stored energy rapidly, and rapidly storing anything you eat afterwards as fat just in case you don't get food again. Body is more intelligent than we think.
2. Once a fat cell is born it craves fat and that makes you hungry. Rapidly losing weight by staying hungry will only remove fat from fat cells but won't kill them. Weight loss must be sustained for longer time to have any permanent effect.
3. I have replaced white rice with brown rice, white bread with whole grain wheat bread and started eating sprouts and corn, oranges, guava etc. other fruits. Sprouts are killer deal man - you eat 200g of it you will hardly feel hungry for hours.
4. You need to do some physical exercise everyday - not intense, just walking is okay. But you have to be consistent so your body learns how much energy you are going to lose anyway and doesn't store much fat.

I have yet to start heavy exercises but I like the effect on my body :)
Even if I didn't know about the Coke association, the problem I would have with a 10 week study is that it's a 10 week study. It's not evidence of sustainability.

10 weeks of changing your diet in general will probably lead to weight loss as long as you're not increasing your total calories, but that doesn't mean that the diet is sustainable long-term. If you live on say, a few donuts a day, you'll lose weight, but it'll also give you terrible sugar crashes and you won't be able to focus. You'll be irritable. It will really suck, and you'll either end up eating more or seeing your quality of life suffer.
Not really, because simply by running untrusted Python bytecode in any form you are exposing yourself to much worse than this. You're already past the airtight hatch[1], so it's pointless - "It's like saying that somebody's home windows are insecure because a burglar could get into the house by merely unlocking and opening the windows from the inside."

1. http://blogs.msdn.com/b/oldnewthing/archive/2006/05/08/59235...
It's not Microsoft's fault that osx is an OS with extremely bad hardware support.
Policies that are out of line with reality are bad policy: the war on drugs does not fix drug abuse, vagrancy laws do not fix poverty, and the war on bundling merely ensures that bundled software goes unreported.

The metaphor doesn't pan out. The third is canonizing a technical error.
Or perhaps creeps could try stop being creeps.
React keeps all of the "DOM" stuff in memory. Thus it is inefficient and unnecessary to use jQuery to do anything to the DOM.
The Chromebook Pixels actually have as good (or better) touchpad than MacBooks
> ...and I'll bet this practice of discouraging bundling is a huge part of that.

Your bet would be wrong. Debian also discourages bundling[1], and so does Ubuntu[2]. The reason the policies look similar is that Ubuntu policy is derived from Debian policy.

[1] https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-source.html#s-em...
[2] http://people.canonical.com/~cjwatson/ubuntu-policy/policy.h...
It was a very contentious decision, causing a huge ruckus on the mailing list. I for one don't agree with it at all.

The only small blessing is that RPM metadata will contain:

Provides: bundled(crappy-library)

so it's possible automatically to determine what embeds that library should a security bug arise. (It doesn't make it easier to fix the N copies of that library of course).
Not that long ago people tried to argue that marriage equality wasn't needed to protect basic rights of individuals involved. They just needed to use contracts/adoption/etc.

This is a great article to remind us how bogus that argument was.
Many times the "right" thing is a balance between using a library/module as a black box and implementing something yourself. It usually involves a lot of considerations.

* License is it compatible with the rest of your code?

* Relative size of module vs what you need from it. The size of the module introduces a non-trivial maintenance burden.

* Difficulty of just doing it yourself. Is the thing you need to do non-trival? like say encryption? or Distributed Consensus?

* Is the module compatible with the internals of your system? Will it require significant changes to how your code or application works?

* Platform support? Will the module work on all the platforms your code/application will run on?

All of these things influence the decision. A knee jerk response of "Just use X" may be right but you'll find yourself in the position of not knowing why it's right and thus unable to adjust if it ever stops being right.
I have a Surface Pro (original) and have used both the original Type Cover and the Type Cover 2 (illuminated). Both are fine for a tablet/laptop hybrid. I tested the Type Cover 4 a couple weekends back and it's fantastic. If I weren't switching to a Surface Book, I'd definitely be considering a Pro 4 with that new type cover. The key feel is amazingly good for the size and weight.
> 6000 calories worth of peanut butter in one shot

WHAT?! Please make a YouTube video. I will show all my friends and family. The amazing Peanut Butter Eating Hero.
+Disability.gov
There are a couple things going on with this story:

One is the role of technology in sports which is really interesting. In other sports there is a lot of debate over what technology is allowed and what isn't. I would be really interested to see some things like how far someone could hit a golf ball if there were no restrictions on the club or ball or how fast a person could swim if there were no restrictions on the swimsuits.

The second thing, however, is that the text of the story and the video have different focuses. The text focuses on telling the story of how this is a grassroots movement by some athletes. The video, however, seems to have a more pronounced undercurrent that this might really be about one company, BalancePlus, trying to put pressure against an upstart competitor, icePad, who is eating into their market share. I think it is really interesting that the text doesn't emphasize this as much as the video does.
Have you tried using server-side rendering as a viable alternative that lets you use frameworks like React?
Huh. It's running perfectly fine on my 2009-era thinkpad x201 (i5 with Intel integrated graphics...) Are you using the Intel driver, with mesa-libgl?

I'm viewing it in Firefox on Arch linux.
OK, you were _nearly_ hit by someone on a bicycle, and you lived to tell everybody about it on the Internet. Meanwhile, 2.4 million Americans are injured in car collisions every year, and tens of thousands of them die.
All in all, you are absolutely right. But then, other problems breed another set of solutions.
This is just one, even if not optimal. It took 3 hours in the making, tops.
Tesla’s autopilot gets pulled over for doing 75 in a 60
The Microsoft Surface Book First Look
Great comment, not sure why it was down voted. Cultures outside the US are often surprising.
If you expand the definition of systems administration to include everything, it doesn't get you any closer to a solution.

The largest problems of development have nothing to do with administering anything (edit: for example, bad design often results from bad design decisions that are neither prevented nor fixed by seeing that the required documents have been written.) The idea that Winslow Taylor's principles can solve these problems is a fallacy - a commonly held one, but a fallacy nonetheless.
You are correct. Normal people should eat low glycemic foods also, true. But, not for the same reason that diabetic people have to. A diabetic person can't handle spikes in blood sugar, while a normal person can without consequence.

What is interesting is the mechanism that causes low glycemic food to digest slower. It's the fiber! Processed Uncle Ben's has .6 grams of dietary fiber per serving while brown rice has 3.5 grams per serving. For the same reason brown rice takes much, much longer to cook breaking down the cellulose to make it palatable, brown rice takes much, much longer to have it's energy absorbed into the blood stream, the fiber.

When a person eats low glycemic therefore high fiber foods, they are getting the same amount of satiation per same quantity of food, but that fiber is passing through without being absorbed. So, people eating low glycemic foods are consuming less calories for the same level of satiation. That is the 10,000 ft view but it more complicated than that because different foods have different levels of satiation based on many things that are more than just physiological but also psychological.

The article says that high blood sugar levels lead to weight gain which isn't entirely true in most people. High blood sugar levels while the liver has stored as much energy as it can in the sugar analogue glycogen leads weight gain and eating low or high glycemic foods doesn't matter.
Heh, before my comment gets downvoted to oblivion: the apparently too subtle point was that for the foreseeable future machines will be unable to detect this kind of passive-aggressive comments, and that trolls aren't dumb, they will just (deep) learn to be more subtle in their trolling (and so more damaging).
That depends on who issued the debt and what happened after that. If WD issued the debt, they could use that incoming cash to pay the old stockholders to gain the shares in SanDisk. That would be a real cash outflow. Bigger company after the transaction, and bigger debt.

Alternative is that WD pays cash to stockholders they might have had lying around. Then issue debt in SanDisk and pay dividend upstream from Sandisk to WD afterwards. Bigger company, and bigger debt result, only different place for the debt. Sometimes tax incentives help which route to choose (private equity often loads up firms on debts, since interest is deductible).

Only way to 'pay less' would be (happens sometimes) that you can buy a company that holds a lot of cash, but that has a relatively low valuation one way or the other. Perhaps stockholders sense risks and don't expect dividends (market cap in that sense is expected value of future earnings plus lots of noise). Then you buy company, and use the cash for superdividend right away. Bigger company results, but with relatively stronger solvency since you've paid part from cash that was 'undervalued'.
Friends and people on my blog told me JuiceSSH is cool, maybe try that?
Because, car accidents, child neglect, spouse abuse, healthcare, time lost to work...

Some of those other things are regulated as well. E.g. You can't rappel in many state parks, because idiots kept getting hurt and costing the state $$$ in rescue attempts to remote locations.

Its not all cruel government heedlessly restricting rights. That's an immature viewpoint. Count the cost and see that nothing is free.
Unfortunately, his review sample only had the weak Intel integrated GPU. I can't wait to see some numbers from the models with the nVidia GPU.
This book is kind of a joke among people who are seriously interested in nutrition. There is some decent information in there, and the research Taubes is doing now actually seems like it might be pretty good, but the book has some really bad conclusions that are not supported by science. It's a good intro book, but take it with a big grain of salt.
Couldn't agree more. And you should in theory be able to generate a style guide document from a linter. I know you can do it for CSS
The three links, especially the LW comment, go into details of what exactly this is supposed to mean.

TL;DR: The models that were popular in times of Galileo weren't stories told to poor villagers by the Evil Church; they were precise mathematical tools that could be used to predict in advance the positions of planets, eclipses, etc. They also had an elaborate explanations for what the parts of their models mean. And then comes Galileo with a theory that's inferior, built on arbitrary assumptions, doesn't agree with observation and fails to match the predictive capabilities of established models.

The strength of a model is its ability to predict the future, and therefore no sane, rational person could accept Galileo's model over the common ones based on the evidence they collected and analyzed so far. That's what I mean by "enough evidence to promote one model over another". It eventually took Newton, few decades later, to basically sort things out by providing a) an actual explanation for why stuff would orbit other stuff, and b) mathematical model that spat out better predictions than the previous models did while being also simpler. And only then scientific world moved to accept the new picture - when it became the one that matched available evidence the best (it still took a few hundred years to sort out the kinks though).

People in times of Galileo weren't stupid, the Church wasn't supressing astronomy, and Galileo himself got sacked for being an ass to authority.
This thing looks nice but I think the Surface Book is going to be the breakout device for Microsoft in this generation.