skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
The problem is that some of these responses contain words like "trust" and "morally bankrupt" which shows we're still emotionally reliant on some unwritten rules of fair treatment. We have to conduct business without that emotion.

Show me a company who will not screw you, given the right (wrong?) circumstance. Yet we must partner with some of them temporarily to succeed. We should be gambling on whether or not they can build a viable business going forward, not whether they will ditch us in tough times because they absolutely will.
How to stay in the zone for NaNoWriMo
Google Badwolf: Temporal graph store abstraction layer
FWIW most "people in the street" got a net benefit from the LIBOR manipulation. The people on the losing side were mostly large traders - i.e. sovereign wealth funds and wealthy individuals (though admittedly also some mutual funds and similar organizations that ordinary folks invest with e.g. CALPERS).
> Weren't they trying to divide YouTube from "Google" as well, this kind of doesn't help

It might, in the long term. The next step after expanding the services offered under Google Play Music subscription and adding a new name for it (without immediately disrupting anything) might well be retiring the old name, moving the whole audio/video streaming product area under the YouTube brand.
Runs fine on my air. Fan whirs a bit.
As the father of a 5 year old and a 3 year old, that's simply not true.
Long term the S&P 500 has an annualized return between 6 and 7%, after adjusting for inflation.
I'm running 10.9.5 and was planning on rebooting my machine, replicating once more, and filing an issue tonight :)
I agree. I got up to the point where prob about 50% of my remembered dreams were lucid and I was pretty good at fighting the urge to wake up and the uncontrollable nod back to unconsciousness. Many years after I quit actively lucid dreaming, I still had "semi-lucid" dreams very often and it often seemed like my dreaming-self was somehow less free and more attached to my waking-self because of it. ie; i was much more often myself and preoccupied with waking anxieties in my dream.
Wrong. Unless its a physical item, Google requires the use of their billing system (with 30% tax):

See more here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10429574
That would be what most people mean when they say they laws are not working. Similar to how, if our laws allowed highwaymen to get away with murder, we'd say they were failing us even though they were working perfectly to protect armed robbers.
My issue with Cython is that (at least as I've understood it from the tutorials I've read) it's a sub-language within Python, where you add Cython elements iteratively+incrementally (diverging from Python in the process) until the code runs "fast enough".

I'd rather work directly in a full-featured, internally-self-consistent language (and Nim is a very nice language) from the start. Hence -- for me, at least: Nim. :)
The Arab Spring was partially inspired by Iran's Green Movement in 2009: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iranian_Green_Movement
Since you've posted this incorrect information in at least 3 places in this thread, I'll say it again. You're wrong:

See more here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10429574
They don't claim to be objective, they claim to pass on data that is real. You don't know what they don't pass on, you don't know what they change and you can't know whether or not something is real without outside verification. Think of them as an imperfect channel that seems to present - to date at least - an insane amount of real data and the occasional manipulated video.
> Oh right, feeling like you are being treated humanely and respectfully is "weaksauce."

Yes, it is. When the best one can say for the culmination of a multi-generational civil rights struggle is that it makes you feel a little better, then that's not much of a improvement.

> Mother would have to make sure her will/paperwork was perfect to not leave out child and child would make sure their will/paperwork was perfect so as to not leave out mother.

Your parents should already be drawing up a will because the problems with dying intestate go well beyond accidentally leaving out a child. (You're worried about siblings challenging a will? Enjoy what will happen without a will!) Your hypothetical is only relevant in a situation in which people have already screwed up big time. As downsides go, this is very small compared to what one gained.

> After all that I still can't add my spouse (who is now legally my parent) to my health insurance

Children usually go on the health insurance, so you could have done it the other way around. I would also point out that in the relevant time period, employer health insurance was not as critical as it is now. (I don't know how Obamacare would enter in here.)

> Sounds like a bum deal.

The question is not whether it was worse than regular marriage, since it is. The question is whether adoption is so futile and useless a strategy that it was not worth doing at all. And that's not supported by OP at all.
Ahem... No wonder they tried to hide the warnings...

% gcc -o yanim yanim.c -lm
yanim.c:1:1: warning: data definition has no type or storage class

yanim.c:1:1: warning: type defaults to 'int' in declaration of 'c' [-Wimplicit-int]

yanim.c:1:3: warning: type defaults to 'int' in declaration of 'p' [-Wimplicit-int]

yanim.c:1:5: warning: type defaults to 'int' in declaration of 'i' [-Wimplicit-int]

yanim.c:1:7: warning: type defaults to 'int' in declaration of 'j' [-Wimplicit-int]

yanim.c:1:9: warning: type defaults to 'int' in declaration of 'n' [-Wimplicit-int]

yanim.c:1:11: warning: type defaults to 'int' in declaration of 'F' [-Wimplicit-int]

yanim.c:1:16: warning: type defaults to 'int' in declaration of 'k' [-Wimplicit-int]

yanim.c:1:18: warning: type defaults to 'int' in declaration of 'm' [-Wimplicit-int]

yanim.c:1:40: warning: return type defaults to 'int' [-Wimplicit-int]

yanim.c: In function 'main':
yanim.c:1:56: warning: implicit declaration of function 'usleep' [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]

yanim.c:1:72: warning: implicit declaration of function 'puts' [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]

yanim.c:2:52: warning: implicit declaration of function 'putchar' [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]

yanim.c:5:24: warning: implicit declaration of function 'cos' [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]

yanim.c:5:24: warning: incompatible implicit declaration of built-in function 'cos'

yanim.c:5:24: note: include '<math.h>' or provide a declaration of 'cos'

yanim.c:5:33: warning: implicit declaration of function 'sin' [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]

yanim.c:5:33: warning: incompatible implicit declaration of built-in function 'sin'

yanim.c:5:33: note: include '<math.h>' or provide a declaration of 'sin'
Evil, standard industry practice. Pot-ay-to, pot-ah-to.
Yeah, it feels like it is just common knowledge (usually given as example during the lecture). But it's difficult to find this one in a form of nice reliable formal publication.

I wish some student somewhere would publish a review paper in some reputable place, clearly describing this cascade of entanglements from start to the end using an example of photomultiplier. Cascade starting from a photon and ending with a 'classical bit' sitting in the memory cell...
Awareness is the key. When lucid, you will realize the world around you is fake, your thoughts won't be scripted, you might change things with focus, and the dream may even implode (you wake up) seconds after first awareness.

Easiest way to know difference is keep asking if you're dreaming. Right now, something is in your mind that knows you're awake that you don't feel in dreams and not for long in lucid ones. Plus, lucid dreams break rules of reality in obvious or subtle ways you'll spot. Persistent awareness of this means you'll eventually notice a discrepency from habitual checks and wake up instantly (in dream or in reality).
I don't buy the "you wouldn't understand" either. Here are simple explanations of a buffer overflow:

- We agree I'll give you max 1L of water, so you prepare a 1L bucket. Then I pour 2L of water into your bucket - you end up with a mess. (exploit version: We agree that if any water hits the ground, I can force you to do anything.)

- I give you card with typical form to fill in (squares for every letter). First 5 squares are for first name, next 5 are for last name. You fill in "Michael" as your first name overflowing into last name space.

- etc...

Sure, it doesn't capture all intricacies of the mechanism, implementation, side effects of the overflow, etc. But don't tell anyone they wouldn't understand the concept.
> If you produce short but informative videos, you will end up penalized under the revenue sharing model.

I'm not sure that's true. The revenue split is based on total watch time, so shorter videos will make less per view. However, short informative videos would presumably tend to be more popular than long, uninformative videos, leading to a much larger view count and a greater total watch time.
Ugh. It's not only that, but why don't you also mention that even with the file format shift, there are so many difficulties in your sync architecture. If you switch to Opvault for instance, you lose sync with Windows and Android. If you didn't buy the right version of 1Password from the Mac App store not your own store, you can't iCloud sync, so you can't sync with iPhones and require complete repurchase just to get iCloud sync. Sigh. It is so sad particularly when I see your hot new feature is large fonts for revealing passwords.
> The article details the gymnastics required, required only of gay couples, to approximate those rights.

Now you are moving goalposts. First you were all 'look at how total a failure this is and how this is proof marriage is the only possible option'; when I point out that it worked out just fine for all the people who did it, now you're backpedaling to complaining about 'gymnastics'.

And as gymnastics go, having a parent fill out a form, enduring a rubberstamp social worker visit, and filling out some more paperwork is hardly an Olympic-level feat; especially when one consider what this gets you (a clever legal hack to secure a very large set of legal rights that would be unobtainable otherwise for 40 years or more, going by the mentioned years). The surprising thing is that it wasn't more common.

> The article details the patchwork quilt of rights, the limits, the variation among States, that resulted from this sort of "solution."

The article details how this worked out quite well for them. I don't see much of a 'patchwork' or discussion of the limits, or how the variation was a serious problem. (If you read OP, the biggest problem described seemed to be a hypothetical legal conundrum about some incest laws that the lawyers were still arguing between themselves about.)
And do you think all that is sustainable??? For Common to be profitable it should be charging you way more than 250 market rate.

Though the person you are replying.. was uncouth in how he was saying his thoughts. There is validity in those thoughts.
I'd highly recommend they look at electric versions of those devices when possible.
I'm going to have to see how close I can get to doing without youtube anymore. There's a lot of useless timesink to it, multiplied by so many of us humans who could be doing something more fulfilling, more gratifying, healthier.
Setting up a private email server was actually allowed by the official rules at the time. I have no idea why that was the case, but presumably they had some reasons for creating that exception. Honestly, that's the real question IMO.

PS: I also wonder how this worked in practice. I mean I would assume top officials spam rules where setup to ignore hillary@somerandomdomain.org due to spoofing if nothing else.
"Imagine if I told you to go to the file cabinet and remove the 8th folder in the Mason file. Well, it turns out that the Mason file only has five folders, and neither of us were careful to think about the boundaries. So you go and count off seven folders after the first Mason, but then end up grabbing a folder that's three into the Mitchell file.

"The data on a computer is organized into ordered bytes like the file cabinet, and telling a program to go to some byte's location plus some offset can result in it accessing data that it shouldn't touch, if other safeguards aren't in place."
I have found Michael Porter's Five Forces a useful tool when reasoning about supplier power. I think supplier power and how we respond to it is the interesting topic here.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Porter_five_forces_analysis#Ba...

In general, ya gotta be real careful. Somehow, you have to counteract the entity's supplier power with your very own buyer power. If you can't do that, you won't likely last. Or more specifically: whether or not you last will depend entirely on the other guy. It will have nothing to do with your own efforts (however vigorous), skill (however impressive), or cleverness (however clevererer).

One thing I know is irrelevant: whether or not you think the company will act as a 'good citizen'. Thinking about a company as if it were a person has little predictive value. Thinking about a company as if its 'Hal' from 2001 -- now we're talkin'. More like a clever psycho no conscience AI on a secret mission that it views as way more important than whatever you happen to be doing with your Saturday's -- that's more like it. This applies twice to public companies (like, remarkably, twitter) as by that point everyone takes the fiduciary thing really very quite most seriously.
You should avoid lucid dreaming. It can fuck up your mind if it already is too flexible in how it handles memory or reality. False memory syndrome + strong, lucid experiences that mimick aspects of your real life (including relationships) seem quite risky. Neat as it is, one's sanity is a much more rewarding experience. :)
Maybe it would be better to just specify the length of the source file in bytes, so we don't have these weird arguments about line length.
That was fun once I figured it out! Broke 900 on my second attempt. My first attempt involved me losing before I matched anything because I didn't know what to do. Then I read the instructions in the comment and had a blast. Amazing how fun a simple puzzle game could be. It got challenging at 700+.

http://i.imgur.com/RBgqKYS.png

I can't play anymore after the surprise though. It won't let me merge 3 and 4. Possible bug or does the objective change? I saw multiplication but nothing multiplies to a prime so I couldn't figure it out.

Was I supposed to take 2x2=4 and 1x3 = 3 and then take 3+4 for 7? That was my only idea but I stopped.

http://i.imgur.com/0yEr0ig.png
That's definitely not how the PIN verification happens, as I got a single digit wrong once and the person on the phone told me that fact.
That looks pretty official to me.
lol I didn't realize it was until I got to: “Before being listed on Yelp we had no problem going around the country speaking to elementary school children about the dangers and consequences of masturbation. Now, with our poor reviews on Yelp, people are beginning to question our morals and ethics, like that is so important. Just because I have been arrested three times for public masturbation and each case was pardoned by the Governor, doesn’t mean our federal funding and government support had anything to do with it. With the assumptions made by Yelp reviewers, they are causing deadly self-rape addictions in this country to continue and in the end it is Big Masturbation that wins. Such a shame.”
Youtube is one of very, very few sites I run adblock on for this reason. I'm fine with ads, as long as they aren't actively blocking content.
I have no doubt that the current jury system is highly suboptimal with regard to ascertaining guilt ("guilt" in the legal sense — as it pertains to a specific system of laws).

However, oldmanjay makes a very important point about how positive feedback loops tend to emerge from those who seek power (i.e., those who seek to control others will attempt to use the limited power they have in an effort to secure even more power). The checks and balance system serves the critical role of subverting some of the darker tendencies of human nature.

I'm certain a better solution exists that solves both problems — a system that determines guilt with high accuracy while maintaining resistance against corruption. I am not so certain that such a system will be implemented in the foreseeable future.
What about Numba for Python in order to get the speed? Or is that a stupid suggestion for your requirements?
We will do a global release soon.
>Why is it inherently valuable to save things that are no longer used?

Current utility is a poor predictor of future utility. For the same reason we have The National Archives, various libraries, and "Big Data" as an entire industry -- Humanity has learned time and time again that information storage is valuable to our collective knowledge. Our ability to decode various languages contributes to that.

>Humans in groups have nasty tendencies toward hoarding.

Could you provide some examples of what you mean? I can only think of the violent history of civilizations when I think of humans in groups. From the sacking of the Library at Alexandria to demolition of the Buddha of Bamyan, humans seem to have a propensity for destruction and genocide.
Think Again: Tech and Media Outlook 2016
My personal favorite is Viznut's classic signature:

#include <math.h> /* outputs 8 kHz 8-bit unsigned pcm to stdout */
main(v,i,z,n,u,t){for(v=-1;;)for(n=pow(/* gcc -lm sig.c;./a.out>/dev/dsp */
1.06,"`cW`g[`cgcg[eYcb^bV^eW^be^bVecb^"[++v&31]+(v&64)/21),i=999;i;putchar(
128+((8191&u)>i?0:i/8)-((8191&(z+=n))*i-->>16)))u+=v&1?t/2: (t=v&6?t:n/4);}

edit: fixed copy/paste error
I actually think they've been very clear on this from the beginning, including the reason why (although it wasn't spelled out).

They've always meant apps that offer more or less the same functionality as official Twitter clients.

For the people who actually read the terms instead of picking up their pitchforks back when Twitter had that big tos "change of heart" would have understood that
They definitely could have handled it better and been clear that the user limit was really meant for Twitter-clones.

It's clear they want to control the way most people use Twitter, but also to show advertising. As best I can recall, the tos change came around the same time as they started putting in ads. Besides the few remaining twitter clones always play catchup when Twitter puts out new features (recent example; polls).
As eropple covered quite well, native Windows latency isn't up to industry standards. ASIO4ALL has been very good to me on the desktop OS, but I believe that is very RAM dependent - I've never run it on less than an i5 with 8GB of RAM, whether XP, Win7 or Win10. Because it's free and community supported, I consider it simply an oversight by MS.

Unfortunately I can't speak to Windows phones or tablets, because I'll admit that I've used iOS for that. There's simply too many good, well, excellent audio programs in that sector to try otherwise. My main ones are Propellerhead Figure, GarageBand, a few synths in production, and djay2 for fun playing tunes and mixing.

The issue that Windows can address with the tablets (not sure about phones) is the ability to plug in a USB soundcard. This is an extremely helpful ability that iOS really doesn't support (again, the native CoreAudio deserves recognition as very good). I got a very small M-Audio (now owned by Avid) soundcard that runs ASIO drivers, has a mic in and phones out (both stereo), and I even got an Asus Netbook with 2GB of RAM to run Ableton Live 8 well enough to create loop-based tracks on the go! For live performance, people simply love the MacBook Pro platform because of stability, and I can understand. The more that Microsoft does though, the more attention that will be granted from software developers to try and capitalize on the potential market. If MS continues to keep their hardware/software combination friendly to more tech savvy type musicians, e.g. plugging in a soundcard and running desktop type software on portable hardware, then I think they'll be able to take some market share.

I do have access to a Surface Pro 3, but because I'm happy and still working on my Lenovo ultrabook with Win10 (keeping my prior Win7 one as a 'desktop'), I'm not really anxious to go messing with that. But, for DJ type folks who use 'controllers' like the stuff made by Pioneer, a Surface Pro plus a controller with built-in audio is a compelling offering. Not cheap, but not a toy either!
Step 1 to getting Mac fixed. Take it to Apple Genius who may well just fix it for free (definitely if it's under warranty and quite often if it isn't) or tell you exactly what's wrong and how to fix it yourself or where to get it fixed cheaply.

Assuming your problem isn't already solved, then Apple products are no easier than rival brands aside from being better built in the first place, having standardized parts, a simple range of models, and an active third party market.

I'm sure Microsoft has different levels of support, but I suspect everyone you're talking to is referring to Apple's standard warranty coverage. I'd rather have an Apple product with standard coverage than anyone else's product with "gold" or "platinum" or whatever they call it support. (From my experience of high-end corporate support the only benefit I found was that when I told the support person "assume I tried all that crap" (rebooting, reinstalling Windows, rebooting anything else on the network, etc.) he actually went off script and got to the useful stuff.
Could this have been some kind of booby-trapped honeypot setup strategically to lure a certain kind of hacker?

Albeit, a very unquestioning & gullible one?
Hashing wouldn't help much for a PIN (which is usually just 4 digits). You could get a rainbow table for that in like 5 seconds. Even salting wouldn't help, given how tiny the keyspace is.
I'm not sure how "tinfoily" a suggestion is when it's referencing wikileaks. Wikileaks is in the business of conspiracies. It isn't much of a stretch to suggest a conspiracy might be behind wikileaks itself.
Read https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7954406 if you like.

A lot of people are vocal about the price, use it or not; you can't pretend it's not true.
Contact @pinboard, he loves poking his finger at all this stuff.
Or just having a personal email address for non-work reasons. They're still human, even if they're high-level elected officials or CEOs, and they won't have that job/office forever.
> They're going to have to do something about uBlock Origin blocking youtube video ads flawlessly before this ever takes off imho.

Or, you know, do this: "And starting early next year, YouTube Red will get even better with member-only access to new, original shows and movies from some of YouTube’s biggest creators." [0]

(Alternatively, since it can be viewed functionally as just adding an additional brand and a bunch of new services to the existing Google Play Music subscription, its already taken off.)

[0] http://youtube-global.blogspot.com/2015/10/red.html
Isn't the enforcement done at runtime? I remember testing this and the mprotect() call was simply giving me a EPERM back or so.
How to Spark Curiosity in Children Through Embracing Uncertainty
Nope! I'm the guy behind 10MinuteMail.com. But this looks super cool! Glad to see the trend for ephemeral services:) Would be happy to cross promote with links though if the creator is interested.
Even 2FA will have some mechanism for resetting the password without the second factor, because people lose their 2FA device (usually a phone) all the time. There has to be a way to recover from losing your 2FA device - given how easily the social engineering was shown to be here, I doubt that would help much.
Kratke – Short with hash number