skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I quoted that passage out of context intentionally, because I think it represents what most people think of Paul's marriage views, accurately or not. The whole chapter provides a great deal more context to Paul's thoughts on the subject:

https://www.bible.com/bible/59/eph.5.esv

> What, in your mind, should be the outcome of someone who claims to follow the Bible in their marriage w.r.t. this passage?

I know about 300-500 Christian families from my town. When the vast majority of them read that section of Paul's letter to the church at Ephesus (Paul mainly wrote letters, and they weren't divided up into chapters/verses for reference until much later) the key takeaway for them is "I, as a Christian, am commanded to give up my rights for the sake of my spouse and our marriage."

In doing this, I think most people assume that Christians simply pretend they don't want what they really want, and pretend they do want what they really don't want. That's not it at all, and that's merely a recipe for a hollow, hypocritical relationship.

There are certainly differences amongst Christians, and I don't intend to paper over them. I'm just saying, if you have a Christian friend, ask them what these kinds of passages mean to them, rather than assume they are brow-beating their spouse based on two sentences taken out of the context of an entire letter Paul wrote.
great work there.
I never said that there must be an application, I was wondering whether there was one.
I don't even have a github account (unheard of on HN I know), so the requirement to create one to use the site essentially means it goes in the bin.
I run my startup on Clojure and cljs.

Everything you've mentioned has been awesome for us. The arrows we take as pioneers are things like having to roll libraries for email-as-a-service, stripe, etc. Granted it's usually easy but can be time consuming.
> Why fmap has this law

The law is the only law of fmap, which is the "structure preserving law". It means that if you apply a function to each element of the structure, you cannot change the shape of the structure.

This structure preserving property means you can safely apply any function (even ones you don't know what they do) and you can be safe you're not losing information beyond what the function takes away.

> It should possibly be renamed to Container or Mappable to be more in line with what general developers expect.

Mappable would be a truthful name. Container is not a good name because far from all Functors are containers. You can map over a lot of things (I/O actions, functions among others) which are not intuitively "containers", unless you revise your intuition of "container" to mean "mappable". :)

The good thing about calling it for what it is – Functor – is an argument commonly lifted by Edward Kmett: when you're honest about what you're dealing with, you instantly give people access to 80 years of collective knowledge about the thing.
If You’re Not Paranoid, You’re Crazy
Create Bootable Ubuntu and Fix GRUB ISSUE
Sketch plugin for CSS Flexbox layouts
Big Memory .NET Part 2 – Pile, Our Big Memory Solution for .NET
China Wants Our Homes
The environmental benefits of re-introducing wolves are well described. However, with more and more people packed into the south of England, the economic benefits from tourism are going to be enormous. For example the re-introduction of the White-tailed Eagle benefits the economy of the island of Mull to the tune of 5 million UK pounds per year.

http://www.rspb.org.uk/Images/wildlifeatwork_tcm9-282134.pdf
Daily Fantasy’s House Money
Piskesmæld, whiplash, migræne, hovedpine, ondt i hovedet aarhus
I'm not sure that it makes a difference in this case, but it is insufficient in situations such as these to look at just the expected return. A rational agent's actions are determined by expected utility, which could be highly non-linear depending on myriad factors such as the player's net worth. i.e. it could be rational to trade a lower chance of the largest payoff for a more consistent payoff of a lesser but still substantial amount, even at the cost of a significantly smaller expected return.
Relevant xkcd:

https://xkcd.com/1570/
As Cybercrime Proliferates, So Does Demand for Insurance Against It
Ahh Mull! We are visiting Oban next week (big trip - we're coming over from the Netherlands via the ferry), and I'm going to try and get over to Mull, Iona and maybe even Staffa in our own car. I remember seeing the eagles from the bus when I did the Three Islands Tour years ago. I'm really excited for the kids to see the islands, just hope the weather allows it. :)
It's also expensive...the vast majority of users aren't going to buy a U2F key and carry it around. They just won't. 2-way OOB authentication does protect against phishing when combined with other information, such as IP geolocation. For example, the message could say "if you are not in [city from which login is coming], do not reply to this message".
I've been inside the McLaren F1 factory and the assembly workspaces are spookily clean so the Apple stuff wouldn't surprise me
But it does give a strong hint. I personally don't prophesise somethings demise in a shorter timespan into the future than it has existed for. I find that to be a good rule of thumb.

High-level programming has been around for 50ish years, so we probably won't get rid of it for at least another 50.
OK, what's Intel missing for high-performance servers? They've got respectable performance, they've got VT-x and all the other virtualization hardware, what's missing?
Sounds like a contorted way of saying "I click the clickbait" ;)
That's more of a "so the king won't get too distracted" commandment (as the second half of the verse indicates!) Also, the verse before is about having too many horses. When Nathan judges David, the polygamy is de minimis.
Dirtbox – Devices on Planes Used by Government to Target Cellphones (2014)
Both russia and Ukraine operate the specific older SAM (BUK-M1-2) and the missile in question (9M38M1) but I was under the impression that there were different types of warheads and that the warhead in question was only fielded by russia. This seems incorrect though, the entire system in question is still used both by Ukraine and Russia. So the warhead+missile identification does not rule out Ukrainian BUK, however the claim that Russia do not use BUK-M1-2 with 9M38M1 missiles is easily falsifiable, so it's really a very stupid thing to try from the russian side -- recent photos of this system in Russian duty are easy to find. These are discontinued in manufacturing, not in field use.
"Top female Prize " and... no top male prize...We can never be equal while there is any discrimination even when it is possitive. And please don't start with "we need more women in chess thus...". No, we need good players in ches and not insert anything here. And tell, what forces us to improve more than competition? Why play better when you will get prize anyway?
> If you’re poor and suddenly get lots of money, you most probably can’t handle it;

The last study I saw said this was not true. And it's pretty illogical really. A bit of a Gladwellian story, or worst an urban legend since it's pretty mean.

People who are poor/less educated do have trouble with money, yes.

But if you give them a big chunk (lotto or smaller) it greatly improves their lives.

Well off/educated people generally invest the money better but it's silly to think poor people would blow it or worse, become less well off.
If you go to Iona take your kids to Port Ban - just a wee bit up from the Bay at the Back of the Ocean - possibly the most perfect wee pure white shell sand beach anywhere.
~20 minutes for a complete upgrade is impressive to say at least if that's true.

I upgraded at a 500 Mbps line with i7-4930k CPU and a OCZ Revodrive 3 x2 PCI SSD. I didn't pay full attention to it but my download/installation took about 2 hours IIRC.
I do have two other HDDs though, so Windows 10 may have spent some time indexing files which increased the installation time.

Also did the upgrade at a clients computer, typical low-end consumer Toshiba laptop at a 15 Mbps line, it took about 6-7 hours.
patio11 offers some good advice here - http://www.kalzumeus.com/2012/01/23/salary-negotiation/
Customizing PrestaShop PDF files (invoices, slips) – NemoPS
Test cars could be on Ontario roads by March 2016
It is a heuristic that assumes no disruption. If someone figured out how to approach human-level intelligence in the next 30 years, then programming will die then. Are we certain? No. But it is a definite possibility. There is also a possibility of a cybernetic hybrid between programming and machine learning that also doesn't really resemble today or yesterday's HLLs.
> could take my work, attribute it, put it on some SEO'd site and outrank me

Attribution should be made in the way you want it to be made. Your domain name or email or unique random string one could google, could be part of your signature that would be obligatory for others to include if they want to share or build upon your work.

> Very few people are going to find the original source, search it

If I like something that somebody made I usually look him up to find out if he has other cool stuff. I do it with musicians, I do it with authors, with actors, with directors ... less so with graphic designers because they are way harder to find because information about authorship is almost never carefully retained for images.

Same way as with code. If I find cool project I'm looking for original repo and most prominent forks.
Sounds somewhat like YC done by government.
Hopefully something better than XML comes of it before the enterprise gets its grubby hands on it!
Snake Oil Supplements?
Not trying to be cynical, but "simple distributed" is an oxymoron.
Predicting 5 Years of New Housing Construction in San Francisco
There are some great charities trying to restore the ancient woodlands of Scotland - the Trees for Life site has a lot of good information about some of the issues relating to high deer populations:

http://treesforlife.org.uk/
This is not the case, you could really read up more about that.

Here's a comic that explains some of the issues:
http://thewireless.co.nz/articles/the-pencilsword-on-a-plate

Some other bits and pieces:

- If earning a lot was just a matter of intelligence, you'd have as many people earning $100k coming from ghettos, as from rich neighbourhoods. Because intelligence isn't correlated to the social status of your parents.

- Intelligence isn't knowledge. If you're walking on a path riddled with deadly hidden traps, your intelligence will not help you much. And if you're in a race (and career is a race against other people, and against time), even if you're bright, you'll be left in the dust by people who might not be as smart, but were better prepared by their parents and community.

Those are not the "outlying cases" as you call them. The outlying cases are when someone manages to use his/her intelligence to get over all those challenges and switch into a different social class. A cool book called "Outliers" comes to my mind now. It's one of the classics and I highly recommend it: http://www.amazon.com/Outliers-Story-Success-Malcolm-Gladwel...
I have VirtualBox v5.0.4 and can confirm that VirtualBox works perfectly. I currently has 3 VMs:

Debian 8.2.0

Ubuntu 14.04.03

Xubuntu 14.04

All are running x64 and Ubuntu/Xubuntu has 3D acceleration activated.

Guest drivers also works as expected.
> I was saying that it brought no great advances with respect to side effects,

Really? I work with a bunch of languages that does not have controlled side effects, and controlled side effects is the single biggest thing I miss from Haskell. The uncontrolled side effects I swear over daily, if not hourly.

The fact that the order in which I call functions can – undocumentedly – decide whether my program works or crashes is a ridiculous concept. The fact that if I share the wrong piece of data with another part of the application my program starts behaving erratically from having invalid data is odd.

Sharing data should not feel unsafe. Changing the order of method calls should not be a threat.

As long as a function gets the data it wants through explicit parameters, it should work. It shouldn't matter at which point in time I call it, because managing time is really difficult. Managing data is easy.

The controlled side effects in Haskell give you a way to encode these things to give you guarantees and self-documenting code. It gives you opportunities to deal with these problems in sane ways.

Refactoring Haskell code is mostly a matter of symbolic manipulation. A huge chunk of the process doesn't even require me to think about what I'm doing, because I have much more freedom when I don't have to worry about side effects myself. This is good, because I'm bad at thinking and I would like to do it as little as possible. Every single bug that have appeared in my problems have been because I'm bad at thinking.
My thoughts exactly. JSON is great for Javascript clients, but if you're dealing with clients written in multiple languages then there is already a good language-neutral serialisation format: XML. Just because it's not fashionable (with some) doesn't mean it doesn't work.

Edit: So why the downvotes? How about a conversation instead?
See http://www.coboloncogs.org/INDEX.HTM
My reflections on this piece are splintered:

1. Catena is in an excellent position to be the Pardot Kynes of Nuba.

2. A more iconic taking up of the white man's burden could scarce be imagined.

3. By the standards of virtue ethics, this fellow's actions are blameless to the point of ennobling. Does a utilitarian calculus agree (is Catena the high-impact end effector to whom all college Peace Corps soi-disant aid workers ought be working to fund rather than status-signalling through impotent imitation), or are the good doctor's talents inefficiently allocated?

4. On the headline question:

Article: Why does he refuse to leave?

Reader: Because surgeons are soldiers.

Article: Catena joined the Navy and trained as a flight

surgeon...with commandos.

Reader: In this case literally.
What are you referring to? The phrase 'Top female prize' appears nowhere on the linked page.
Maybe nobody goes into science for the money, but if you don't focus on the money you won't stay in science very long.
Britain has scavengers. Foxes, crows, rooks, etc. In fact it's expected that the scrap that large predators leave will help revitalize those parts of the ecosystem too.
There's female infanticide and gender-biased abortions to more than balance higher male mortality in lots of the world.
Because being smart has little necessarily to do with finding a way out of poverty. Your question is approximately as bizarre as asking "if they're smart, why haven't they found a way to bench press 600 pounds." Yes, some people can bench press 600 pounds, and yes, intelligence will likely help developing and sticking to a training and diet regimine. But there are a lot of people who could never bench press 600 pounds, regardless of how smart, well-trained, etc. they are, due to things completely beyond their control. And I hope that no one would see one of these people and conclude that they must not be very smart if they're unable to bench press 600 pounds.
They are referring to this page:

https://millionairechess.com/prizes

Also prizes in each division for "Top senior prize (65+)" and "Best child under 13 yrs old"
Why are we paying for this?
How about if we insist that all browsers force ALL embedded videos (including ADs) to be by default autoplay=off. So we don't suffer page load delays for video content and hidden cost of background buffering? We are paying our ISP for these usually unwanted bytes.
There's more than one passage proclaiming itself to be the most important. Compare eg Matthew 12:31-32:

> Therefore I say to you, any sin and blasphemy shall be forgiven people, but blasphemy against the Spirit shall not be forgiven.

> Whoever speaks a word against the Son of Man, it shall be forgiven him; but whoever speaks against the Holy Spirit, it shall not be forgiven him, either in this age or in the age to come.
> customization of text files for creating shortcuts

what do you mean by this?
>Some people think it's unfair for millionaires to be "taxed at a higher rate" when they've "earned their money." I wonder if they would still feel that way if they understood the millionaire is paying the same rate as everybody else for the first $75k, for example.

In the UK at least once you go into the 45% super high earner bracket (150k I think) - you'll start to lose your tax free allowance which means you do actually pay more tax on the sub threshold income. Obviously it's still designed to ensure no one ever goes over 100% marginal tax rate (where you'd actually lose money by earning more).
I was asking a legitimate question. Why downvote that?
Migrating rails app from postgresql to sql server
Eh... As a moderately frequent concertgoer, I don't recognise much of this. Possibly regionally specific, but in London, a ticket to a big-ticket repertoire symphony with the LSO or whatever can be had for about £10, and a pretty nice seat for £25-30, which is about what I paid to see Nile and Suffocation, surely more niche than Mahler, and probably half what you need to see a big pop act. (Opera is eye-gougingly expensive, though.) The orchestra dresses formally, the audience doesn't (unless they want to). Silence between movements is observed, however, which sort of freaks me out.

I'm ambivalent about the video game music thing, simply because what works in one setting doesn't necessarily work in another. A game score's primary virtue is to withstand repetition and respond to non-deterministic events (which may be a more interesting way to approach a VGM concert than just a tour of Final Fantasy's 'greatest hits' or whatever; certainly there are precedents in the post-war avant garde for that kind of thing). A symphony proper is designed ground-up for the sort of setting in which you are likely to hear it - an acoustically-tuned concert hall, with a highly-trained band of musicians extracting every bit of dynamic range and expressive potential out of their instruments. There's nothing quite like it when it works (there is also nothing quite like, since I've mentioned it, death metal, or techno, or ...)

The problem with 'high-culture' institutions going for populism is that it can be done in a really shallow, instrumentalist way: the VGM concert as the loss leader for Schoenberg frankly isn't going to do any favours to the VGM. It has to be treated seriously, or it won't even be fun - not used as a gateway drug for what the orchestra/concert hall really wants you to listen to.
MH17 Crash Explained
I'm sure we've all wasted keystrokes on stupider things.
Selling copies is insane way to monetize something. When I want to make money programming I'm looking for a person that needs a program and write it for him often requesting at least portion of money up front.

Writing programs in hopes of selling them in the future is like trying to strike gold. Even if you are not horribly wrong and someone will buy copy of your stuff and not immediately request a refund it will most likely be insanely cheap (from your point of view) and expensive for the people who can get that copy for free because it is almost as easy (often easier) than paying for it.
How is that achieved with read only access to the list of registered domains?
There are just too many male chess grandmasters. Look into places where men are outnumbered and you will see "to male X" as a separate category.
I'm not a big C++ user, nor terribly fond of the language in any case, but IMHO the "single-phase lookup" MSVC is doing for templates is conceptually much simpler to understand (and apparently implement) than the standard 2-phase: instantiating a template is literally a textual substitution, which is intuitively what I'd expect and understand templates to be.
Enterprise here. We like XML because it's explicit.

{ number: 1.0000000000000000000000000000001 }

Try parsing the above JSON consistently in several languages without a consistent schema definition.
Apple hides far too many user features e.g. click the top on iOS to scroll back to top.

They may produce beautiful looking things (current iPod Nano excepted) but I think their reputation for usability is over rated (crazy key combinations on laptop keyboard)
In general, this is a very good thing. The main outcome will be that more engineers will be needed to do more work to ensure that data is handled more carefully. The cost will be slightly reduced profits at companies that handle large volumes of data globally. What's bad about that?
Thank you. Exactly what I was refering to (was linked in article).
Have you seen github?
I used to agree, but I've lately come over to the JSON side, I think. It's easier to read by a human, and it doesn't have this weird "should it be a node or an attribute" thing. Single things are properties, many things are arrays.

And now with Schemas and editor support for them, I think it is an acceptable replacement personally.
The cost will also be massively reduced profits at companies that handle small volumes of data globally.
Absolutely happy with my choice of Clojure as a startup (doing data science, analytics, some front-end work).

Biggest wins for us are:

- ClojureScript / figwheel as an awesome front end development combination.

- The combination of functional programming with immutable data structures

- Lisp "magical powers" (macros, interactive REPL etc.)

- Ability to exploit the Java library ecosystem whenever you need it

Biggest downside = Lack of types.
The main conflict is the same as it ever was. Many farmers hate them because wolves kill livestock. Though, perhaps we can more easily afford the losses now.

I found The Economist's 2012 special on the reintroduction of the wolf to be quite informative:
http://www.economist.com/news/christmas/21568656-after-mille...
> The main outcome will be that more engineers will be needed to do more work

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parable_of_the_broken_window

Artificially creating additional work by imposing additional requirements does not necessarily improve the situation just because it employs people to do that work, whether you personally like those requirements or not.
> Talk to anyone in the pacific northwest. If you take only the slightest precautions you have nothing to fear from the wolves, cougars and bears.

I lived in Washington for six years, and I can say that's simply not true. Protecting yourself from predators involves significant work. It's just that everyone is used to it. When camping, you have to store food and toiletries in bear canisters. You have to check for reports of bear activity. You carry bear spray. Some even carry a gun. Despite these preparations, there's the constant anxiety of knowing you might encounter a predator. It really sours the outdoor experience.

> So the wolves will in all probability reduce the number of animal-related deaths.

Wolves aren't the only way to cull the deer population.

When it comes to reintroducing wolves, everyone agrees the risk to humans is low. Almost nobody is going to be killed by wolves. But that argument proves too much. Almost nobody falls victim to serial killers. We still try to reduce the number of serial killers to zero.
I agree with you. But this article states a few reasons, I think are a valid, why a female league is necessary: http://www.chessblog.com/2009/10/abolish-womens-itles-ridicu...
I think i saw it before:

http://www.lispworks.com/documentation/HyperSpec/Body/02_dh....
Mind providing examples of males having prize when outnumbered (preferably not once but consistently) or where men get headstart (like in marathon I can't remember name of, where women get head start)? Because I will be angry about that too. It kills competition, it kills meritocracy.
their underlying architecture wasn't built for it.

it's like trying to build a skyscraper on the foundations of a log cabin.. you can get so far up and things will start to sink back into the mud.