skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
From the article:

> Indeed, in many conservative religious denominations,
> the same tenets are echoed today.

While I'm not going to claim I hold the same tenets as a book I've never read, I guess that I'm in one of the "conservative religious denominations" which the author is indicating here. I can certainly see some resemblance between a few of the examples cited from the book and my current (religiously-inspired) views on marriage.

However, one thing I'd like to explicitly disclaim is the notion that there is any prescriptive support in the Bible for the victorian-era idea that wives should be Doormat Debbies, as alluded to throughout this article.

The most often-cited passage in this regard is Ephesians 5:22-24...

Wives, submit yourselves to your own husbands as you do
to the Lord. For the husband is the head of the wife
as Christ is the head of the church, his body,
of which he is the Savior. Now as the church submits
to Christ, so also wives should submit to their husbands
in everything.

If this is all you know of "Christian marriage philosophy", please take the time to inform yourself. I'd suggest you find someone who claims to follow the Bible in their marriage and ask them how this passage specifically plays out in their married life. (Hint: If the passage is truly being followed, what you will find is anything but a bully of a man and a brow-beaten woman)
>So are you suggesting that clothed women will be better for them than nude women because ...?

If they take out the nude pictures they'll be able to put the magazine in more outlets.
In a certain sense, govt is for the people, by the people, of the people, so I would look at it in a similar way as we look at other social obligations like wearing pants before walking on the streets or not smoking in public areas.
Instead the soda companies have switched to making crazy amounts of money from bottled water, and also increased their sales of “sports” drinks, “energy” drinks, iced tea, fruit juice, etc.

cf: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Coca-Cola_brands https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Dr_Pepper_Snapple_bran... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_assets_owned_by_PepsiC...
Most of the research I've read has said the opposite.

http://examine.com/faq/is-diet-soda-bad-for-you/
http://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/efsajournal/pub/3496
No. You're actually wrong. The verdict is still out on diet soda and artificial sweeteners. This[1] is required reading.

[1] - http://examine.com/faq/is-diet-soda-bad-for-you/
I have a 2013 13" XPS, and it's the best laptop that I have in terms of reliability (owned a bunch of IBMs/lenovos/Sony Vaios in the past)
Why stop there? We might want to monitor people each day via fitbit like devices that report back the data to ensure everyone is exercising the recommended amount. We can then tax or reduce taxes for the applicable individuals.

This could obviously be deemed a bit of a slippery slope fallacy, but I'd argue the above is probably more beneficial than taxing my soda if you truly want to reduce healthcare costs by having healthier individuals. But, who wants to go that far?
True, but, I dunno, since it improves overall health of the population, I'm for it. It's not like they're banning them or taxing them prohibitively, it's more like they are taxing externalities.

That said, one interesting thing I heard about the really poor (at least in India) is that they'll spend a third of their income on junk --as it gives them a "little pleasure" to endure the day. So, this has the potential to be a tax unintentionally skewed against poor people.
Because some of the consequences only become evident when you look at aggregate statistics. For instance, fastening your seatbelts is inconvenient and you may have only heard anecdotes about friends of friends who got hurt by them in an accident, but if you look at the statistics you'll see that buckling up clearly improves your chances of getting out alive.

> Why can't it be that they're making the choices they want to make?

Just because they want to make a choice, doesn't mean it's not stupid-ass choice. One could argue for the right to be stupid, but I draw the line at the point where stupidity becomes an externality.
It's a fantasy that there's any large amount of content that will be altruistically produced. Must content people enjoy are the popular, highly commercialised kind. You mightn't like it, but it's the reality.
Taking money for content is a validation that the content is valuable.
Film cameras to the rescue. DRM that, buddy!
Deep Learning Startups, Applications and Acquisitions – A Summary
I think it's easy and dangerous to assume other people aren't doing what we want them to do because they're not as smart as we are. It allows unlimited license to meddle in other peoples' lives. There are always externalities.
If she says so of course I'll concede the point. I don't really understand how it can be true, since the recorded specs of the AGC were 4K RAM and 64K ROM. That's only a few pages of text even in assembly code.
Most Creative Countries in the World
Or perhaps the soda tax and reduced consumption both stem from the same body of scientific evidence and anti-soda narrative? As a whole, consumers are shifting to healthier eating trends, soda's one of the obvious things to cut.

I agree with the last paragraph, the studies to date haven't shown much. It'd be interesting to compare state-by-state changes over the past 10 years.
not sure i grok this comment, but I think I agree?
I suspect that arrangements or elaborations of other popular music would do pretty well. Video games are easiest, though, because they've often got orchestral or quasi-orchestral music already, along with having tons of easy-to-sell merchandise.
The only surgeon for thousands of square miles in southern Sudan
Is the world caught in a debt trap?
This reminds me, in part, to a famous project Summly from UK (acquired by Yahoo). Is there a relationship, because you're also about abstracts and summaries?

http://goo.gl/OtMgDN
1) It may as well have a right, but just because it has, doesn't mean it should act on it. Those types of decisions are in fact complicated trade-offs. What you're trying to do here is equivalent to binary perception of risk, aka. "it's dangerous outside, so let's all stay in caves". People don't work like that.

2) Many, myself included, disagree that the government is commiting a wrong by penalizing sodas.
I couldn't get over the taste, but I've found that bottled mineral spring water (sometimes flavored with lime or lemon) is a great replacement. It's zero calorie and no sweetner.
AFAIK, studies show that drinking diet soda does not lead to weight loss, it seems to lead people to eat more. Though of course these studies might be bogus, as many studies in nutrition are. There seems to be a huge will to demonize artificial sweeteners, people are convinced that there can be no free lunch.
That's not how tax brackets work, but it is how some brain-dead payroll systems work! I have seen first hand a broken payroll system that simply extrapolates the current pay period out into the full calendar year and then deducts taxes at that rate. This has the result of a small gross increase (usually due to intermittent overtime pay) resulting in a net decrease in pay for that pay period. This is very much an edge condition of an already broken model, but I have definitely seen it happen.
It the typo in the images intentional?
Well, but that's why we talk about it and decide this democratically. Where are we drawing the line on what the government does for public health? Right now, we're not banning sodas, but a tax on them seems like a relatively benign way to curtail the public health hazard sodas represent.

It isn't a slippery slope so much as a discussion we have as a people.

After all, there's very little debate over how much right the government has to nanny-state us with all these traffic lights and traffic lanes (where in the constitution does it say that the government can tell ME where and when I can drive my car??), because we're generally OK with that kind of government-dictated restriction of freedom to move.
I've started companies which have taken (small amounts of) VC funding, and I can tell you definitively it is nothing at all like a MacArthur. Try to close a deal while telling the investor you will treat their investment like a gift, and you will know exactly what I mean. Now granted, YC is starting to do things more MacArthur like, i.e. with their YC Research initiative. In particular the equity grant in YC component is very interesting.

Companies are formed to generate a profit, and investment is a direct expectation of that, or more directly, an expectation for a company to grow their market cap irrespective of any actual profit. MacArthur is the abject opposite of that, cash money without expectation.
New zero-day exploit hits fully patched Adobe Flash
NASA built a plane that was flown by camera
Twitter suspends sports media accounts after NFL says GIFs violate copyright
Developing an analytics strategy that drives business transformation
It was legal because in the king's eyes, the colonists weren't really citizens, they were just subjects, and therefore subject to search and seizure on a whim. That was one of the reasons we had a revolution.

There was also a brief period between 1789-1791 where it wasn't explicitly clear that it was illegal, but that was resolved by amending the constitution.
802.11ac Router Round-Up Tests Broadcom XStream: ASUS Netgear D-Link TRENDnet
The team at Kadira is great at diving into technical subjects and making fun and easy to follow learning materials. I loved Bullet Proof Meteor, I'm looking forward to learning GrapgQL through this new course.
Personally, I would, if FitBit et al. were actually about health and not about sports-obsessed people bragging about their fitness activities. I definitely wouldn't mind being monitored for health with real-time advice on how to optimize it.

As for the bedroom thing, this is a bad kind of slippery slope argument (not all slippery slope arguments are fallacies). It's ignoring the fact that penalizing soda is not a binary +health/-health decision but a complex tradeoff that includes the magnitude of expected gains and the probable sentiment of the public.
http://www.cdc.gov/nceh/radiation/smoking.htm
Yes, that's what the page says: the 20000 yens are for participants, as in instrument players. It also says information such as list of "songs" and tickets purchase will be given later.
Twitter has been doing this for a while: https://blog.twitter.com/2010/murder-fast-datacenter-code-de...
It's not fair to responsible people like me, at 5'10" and 155# (at age 53) to be taxed because other people are irresponsible.

Why don't we tax obesity?

Also, many "healthy drinks" from fruit juice to smoothies have even more calories! And health nuts who hate HFCS think honey and agave nectar are healthy alternatives even though they have even _more_ fructose?
Deep learning with COTS HPC systems [pdf]
I agree. But just because it's dangerous, doesn't mean it never works. Traffic laws are good example of something that's both crucial and something that most drivers go batshit insane about.
Well-written. I'll certainly look into this further.
Bully and browbeaten seems to be a common complaint in modern Biblical families. Obviously there are millions of Christians who have lives they call Christian that are informed by centuries of culture that postdates the Bible.
"Classical" (big "C") refers to the period, but "classical" (little "c") is often used to refer to the vague, nebulous cloud of music to which it often refers and of which Classical music is a subset. I know that's super pedantic and nebulous, but I've never heard a satisfactory term for the broader category. I've heard "Western Art Music", but that implies that Western music outside of its umbrella isn't art, which is plainly ridiculous. So, I use "classical", because it's the least bad term I've heard.
> So IANAL, but didn't Griswold v. Connecticut establish that some rights DO exist without being enumerated anywhere?

Not really,

> Specifically, that the guarantees in the bill of rights have "penumbras" that imply other rights not explicitly stated in any text

No, the ideas of "penumbras" and "emanations" in Griswold are not nonenumerated rights; they are the full scope of the meaning of particular enumerated rights and products of the combination of those enumerated rights, not rights that exist independent of enumeration.
Commented walkthrough of the examples: http://learnrebol.com/rebol3_book.html#section-1.2

Apparently these code examples accompany the author's "book" on GUI Rebol programming.
Inside Pinterest's Plans to Fix Its Diversity Problem
I see they have a choice to not be greedy and bitch about lost sales. This actually earns respect from the consumers. You have to accept that you're not going to capture all the value you're creating.

EDIT: also, happy 2^11-day :).
Perhaps a problem is that this passage tends to be the most taught marriage-related passage in the evangelical churches and para-church organizations I've attended?

One can make many cases for models of Biblical marriage (David, a "man after God's own heart" was polygamous. This is not spoken against in the Bible, but his adultery with another man's wife was condemned. To me, this is implicit support.)

One can also talk about whether Jesus himself would have supported Paul's interpretation and writings about marriage. I tend to find their respective teachings disharmonious.

Paul very much believed in the order of things, and in authority. And in this case (as in the case of master/slave relationships!), the man has authority. Both masters and husbands have obligations to use their authority kindly, but Paul did not decry the authority of one individual over another.

So yes, in the most common interpretation of evangelical Pauline Christianity (i.e. that practiced in Heartland America), the men are not bullies, but they do possess power and authority over women, and I think this power is the thing liberals and humanists take issue with.
Zoho Vault offers free migration to LastPass Users
Flying a civilian plane at 10 km on its daily route is not "provocation".

It seems we'll keep seeing every attempt being made to shift the blame on Ukraine, not the ones who actually decided to pull the trigger. Russia is active in stopping an investigation to find out who it was. That tells me a lot.

Passenger planes routinely fly over conflict zones. A plane flying at >10 km cannot be mistaken for a fighter-bomber. Unless the operators of BUK were, well, drunk, which is still what I suspect, but equally irresponsible.
I guess he means "GREED", maybe, by the sound of the word, ?
Sports/energy/tea/juice drinks are sodas. Chemically, at least. Are they a loophole in the soda tax laws?
C/C++ Preprocessor Metaprogramming
I always say make me an offer around what you pay your current devs. If you pay me significantly more than your other devs it will create bad blood (trust me salaries always get out). If you pay me significantly less it will also create bad blood.

The truth is I don't know your environment or the exact role. Perhaps you pay 20% over market because it's a high pressure role or because there is a lot of travel, or because a 50 hour week is expected, or any of 100 reasons. Perhaps you pay 20% under market because the role is low stress and flexible, or the work is easy, or any of 100 reasons.

If you try and offer me way more than I'm on that's a sign too and it's worth drilling deeper. Is the role what I think it is? Etc etc.

I'd rather find all this out before I start the job.
>...it might be rational to nudge people towards healthier behaviors.

Let's be clear on this issue because the advocates of nudging always seem to rationalize, minimize, evade and deny the fact that govt nudging occurs, ultimately, at the point of a gun.

This is not how civilized people live and, no, it is not rational. In fact, it is the very negation of rationality regardless of any real or imagined economic, financial or health benefits that accrue to the nudgers or the nudgees.
Humans like sugar, instinctively. MBA spreadhseets can't make that false.
Just in: Zoho Vault offers free migration to LastPass Users.

Link: https://www.zoho.com/vault/logmein-lastpass-acquisition.html
Why not filtered tap water? Most bottled spring water is bottled tap water.
But Rent adapts an opera, La Bohème!
Macquarie University moving 6000 staff emails away from Gmail to office 365
There is a scan of the program here [0], which is 1,746 pages. That seems much less than the number of pages in the photo (by maybe a factor of 10 or so?).

If I had to guess, maybe they printed out each revision of the program? Apparently there were seven different versions [1], so if the stack contains all of them, that would account for the difference pretty well.

[0] http://authors.library.caltech.edu/5456/1/hrst.mit.edu/hrs/a...
[1] http://www.ibiblio.org/apollo/links.html#Software_manuals_an...
Thanks for the input and I totally get what you are saying. It may help to know that the end goal is to tie in a CAD system. This way, each "document" contains the math to design a component while the CAD reads from that to display it. This way, the CAD model automatically updates with changing design requirements just like the part trees already do. What you see is really just a first step.
Loveland is the successor to http://whydontweownthis.com which was one of the original interactive maps of urban blight by parcel in Detroit. It seems that they offer similar information and mapping nationwide now.
This is why the US needs a Constitutional Court so badly to vet bills after they get signed by the president, like other countries have. Then you wouldn't get stuck with unconstitutional laws for many years or even decades, letting them abuse an entire generation of people.

Now the replies will go like "but the US has an adversarial justice system!". Yeah. Except for that whole three decades old secret FISA court that is in charge of spying. No adversary there.
5 Steps to Fix iTunes
I think the most interesting, or scary, part of all of this is the justification for this warrantless search and seizure: to stop Uber from operating in the city. Usually the government has to invoke public safety to try to justify removing individual rights. Now they can just invoke the taxi lobby I guess.
That speaks to the "operating" costs not to the initial "investment" to get the vehicle off the dealer lot.

Why can't a manufacturer make a profitable vehicle which is also affordable for the consumer, even at the high-end of the market?
This is on of the things that fascinates me about the US. Such blatant injustice would be unthinkable in the Europe.
Do you mean carbonated water?
For some reason, Courts so far have agreed to buy the government's whole twisted logic that "things can be guilty of crimes", and under that twisted logic it seems to make sense to do that.
Until about 5 years ago the Power architecture dominated in the CPU performance domain. Saying "IBM is too incompetetent" makes you sound like you don't really know this market.
Huge fan and proponent of Optimizely and the platform they offer, we made them an integral part of our agency for our performance based CRO clients as a tool we could bring to the table to help execute our ideas for the past 3 years.

That is, until they changed their model and began to push agencies off the platform by insisting that the client and not the agency must have the account relationship with Optimizely, and the agency can then "work" on the account but no longer under one account spread across multiple clients.

I have no objections to pricing changes and strategy pivots, more power to them and I understand to develop more and more features, pricing must be raised to match usage. We would happily pay more per month, however we don't see the business sense in handing over our client relationships directly to Optimizely so that our clients could then choose to drop us as an agency at anytime, but keep the Optimizely account.

An account that would be full of our work product, testing ideas and custom code developed to implement tests that a client could now easily take to another agency and continue benefiting from the work.

(Yes, we have contracts with our clients, but we are not naive enough to think that clients won't look for a way to do away with our fees if they can take our services and work product with them.)

Our ability to utilize the tools provided by Optimizely and build winning tests has helped us grow our business, but this change in agency support has caused us to need to look for alternate solutions.

It would be great if some of this latest raise could be used to re-invest in agencies again, providing a client manager style interface where multiple accounts/sub-accounts can reside under one login. Even if each client needs to have a different pricing structure based on their usage patterns, can't share visits across clients, but could be arranged and managed by the agency as one point of contact and billing.

I'd love to kick back up our usage of the platform, as the new features I see them rolling out are enticing and I am sure this raise will only accelerate that, but we can't commit to a vendor that seems to actively enable and almost encourage our clients to circumvent our own service model.
I think that depends on the world you're trying to apply it to.
How to listen to (and delete) everything you've ever said to Google
This. It's the thing that stands apart from the rest of the email. "Up to 336". Huh? That is far too specific. Either that was an exact percentage of staff, or they have the list of 336 people, and may reverse on up to a couple of dozen if they fight for their positions with good explanations as to why they deserve to stay.

"Up to 336". The fact that phrase made it into the email is unbelievable. Who, being at the head of a company so large, writes with that kind of language?
I was certain I'd just looked at that page, but there appear to be a lot of new additions I can't recall. But does Red have I/O and network support now?

I suppose I should head over to gitter to ask, but perhaps someone here knows? I tried a search for http and network in the github repo, but didn't find anything that looked like support for slurping/pushing data over the network?
Very true. I am still awaiting the day this is extrapolated to gun rights and watch the hypocrisies rain.
Facebook Goes on Privacy Offensive in Europe
Any warranty can be satisfied by simply refunding the purchase price.
Architecture in Video Games: Designing for Impact
What you're describing is tax-withholding. In this situation you would receive the extra tax withheld when you file your tax return, so you're not really having extra tax taken from you. You could also always claim more allowances on your W-4.
Back to the Future: Brisbane man gives fans peek with DeLorean replica
For the employees affected, the "generous exit packages" is all that matters. Do you know what I consider to be generous? 6 months of pay, no less. What did they probably get? 4 weeks. It's disgusting to see this kind of language in an email, when the employees are obviously being screwed beyond belief.
This is really informative, thank you.

I fit squarely into the 9 / 10 rule - I'm locating to another geo. The geo I'm presently in pays more on avg than the geo I'm moving to. So looking at Glassdoor & Angel List to figure out how big that difference is.
I don't see the benefit. It seems no easier on the eyes than JSON and it's more complex with more syntax rules to learn. I wouldn't recommend this for either humans or machines. HJSON would be my choice for a human readable data notation format.
If you click a link on Google Maps or Google Search, doesn't the site get the query in their GA or something?
Thanks for the info, but I wasn't talking about geosynchronous orbits. I was talking about the term the GC used: 'geosynchronous lunar orbits'. i.e. an orbit synchronous to the rotation of the moon.