skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I'm not a web developer, I am not intimately familiar with the intricate details of SSL, and yet I understand what a root store is and how it works. I have used certmgr.msc in the past, understanding that it should show me the certificates trusted by the system -- no more, no less. I did not immediately realize that it was not showing me all the certs my system trusts and I would like to know how I could have immediately realized that without knowing all the major CA's and the names of their root certs off the back of my hand.

Perhaps that could be written off as my failing in not knowing what certmgr.msc "should do", but Windows certainly does not make it very clear and I think it's reasonable for an average power user to assume that it shows all the trusted certs on the system, and not part.
I agree with you, but I wouldn't presume to tell someone else how to give their lives meaning, just because I'm "older", or to tell someone they will later regret not taking the same path in live as me.

Some people just aren't cut out for the family life.
Donald+Trump+and+Wikipediology
True. Can't believe they actually pulled something like that
What is new in Npackd 1.20?
I don't understand your point here. Bitcoin has changed consensus multiple times. All that was demonstrated by the Bitcoin XT proposition was that there is some support(though not much) for a change of project maintainership. If you're concerned about whether bitcoin could support changes, that's fair, it may not. Thus far it has.

The opinions of the teenagers on r/bitcoin don't matter much, as very few of them are either: coders, miners, or even users.
It's bad design then :)
No. Google will pay for the requisite licenses.
CCC = ?
Could you do the same shootings yourselves ? how much time/complexity would it take ?
He was just really lucky. He stole most of the ideas from older games, and repackaged them in a horrible turd of a codebase, acting like he invented programming.

That guy build a folder tree in the filesystem because of "performance", which means he put a trie on a b-tree because he didn't know about the latter.

Also so much for "I'm going to open source this, once I'm rich and famous".
Wow this is elegant. Well-written article and super engaging story. The tab on the screenshot is magical.
Flattery will get you everywhere :}
For me it is mostly support, so it tends to be questions like "how do I do this thing that is explained in the FAQ that I didn't read"?

If it was questions from colleagues then I might reply, although it would probably depend on the situation, and I certainly wouldn't want there to be an expectation that I would reply quickly to any and all emails. (I don't have any colleagues, so it's not an issue for me :)
Yes, but if management believes it then it becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy.
They will as long as it doesn't have a programmable radio.
Aside from geography, how is this need not served between Hipcamp, Airbnb, and Couchsurfing?
Nice insight. Learning more languages, especially those that seem to be different, could widen one's perspectives, and able to avoid the issue of learning only hammer and treat all problems as nails.
"Practical Object-Oriented Design in Ruby: An Agile Primer" is a really good book for learning object oriented design. Not sure how long - but it's worth it - and you don't really have to read the whole thing.
Just explaining the pure mathmatical roots isn't always done, or cross field relations. It drives me insane when you use cross field tools, and when you bring up, Oh so we're doing X but with Y.

The response is often, No we do X because of Z. Which often you're learning Z. So now you just feel lost and confused. Its not 2 classes later until you'll learn A maps Y to Z and X is actually an operation of A so it applies to both.

I guess it's just me but the joy of math has always been its tangled relationships to itself.
For one example, Scala's `for` syntax is quite similar to Haskell's `do` notation, and lets you do some monadic things with `Option`, `Seq`, and other classes.

And then you can go much further into that world with the scalaz library.
> The only thing that can kill bitcoin is a technological advancement that makes its security weak or vulnerable

If by "bitcoin" you mean "cryptocurrencies" then yeah, security is the only real killer. But the thing that's most likely to kill Bitcoin is a better cryptocurrency.

The article's laundry list includes some real issues. Mining really is horrendously inefficient. Confirmation time really does make BTC infeasible for many kinds of transactions. And deflation really will cause problems, if it's not doing so already.
Mmm, Desktops v2 seemed to work OK, though I never tried it in Windows 8. And there were always third-party alternatives.
https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/sysinternals/cc817881

I am glad that virtual desktops are now natively supported.

No argument there ;-)
The problem with Youtube as a music platform is the mobile app. Minimizing the app to do another task (like replying to a text) stops the video from playing and in turn stops the audio from playing. If they allow it to play in the background then a lot more people would use it as their music source.
Not every protocol change is controversial enough to prevent the majority from upgrading.
A great example of a group of people gelling into a team with its own culture in a way that enhances its work. I ran across this example in the book PeopleWare:

http://www.amazon.com/Peopleware-Productive-Projects-Teams-E...

It had a lot more wisdom in it on teams, interruptions, flow, and so on. I recommend anyone that enjoyed this story to get it as it has many more with recommendations. Of course, my version was an older one so the new one might be better or worse. I'm sure it will be Good at the least. ;)
There is a difference between, shiny shit, minimal design, and no design. Ford F150 Raptor is shiny shit, a Jeep Wrangler or an Icon FJ are pretty minimal design, and a subframe and 4 wheels, is just a subframe and 4 wheels. Sure, the letter can get you from point A to point B, but come on, it's not a proper car. I would argue that the design on c2.com and the wonderful diatribe of the fellow with a little too many "fucks" in his opus lacks design entirely rather then keeping it minimal, there is a difference. The lazy lack of design, which is similar to the lazy over-designing, should not be confused with proper balance of minimal design.
Simply Good Food TV now available in the apple and android app store
That's because it's Oracle. Everything associated with Oracle is a legal nightmare.
Chaos Computer Club
If you're interested in seeing new roots, Microsoft has started posting all updates to the cabfpub mailing list:

https://cabforum.org/pipermail/public/2015-August/005847.htm...
What % of total drug sales happen online?
The Partially Observable Markov Descision Processes Page
So basically they need to invest in the economy they cannot plan for consumer..

the only similar case Germany during WWII 250% or more debt over GDP but GDP was not expanding due sole effort on military building
For me is isn't either or but rather both - algorithms, startups and family.
I found that deleting cookies resets that setting (just like turned off autoplay, "worldwide" region settings and the like are reset).

They don't seem to be tied to your account (so they'd be reinstated when you log in)... :/
Sad that we need to research how to get access to research.

How much impediment to the progress of the arts and sciences should we allow copyright to impose?
Indie Developers Cannot Count Money
Oblio that's leet speak. hacker history (well and present) nothing that a google search won't clarify.
Doradus – A graph-based data model, advanced indexing and search for Cassandra
How the 2016 Candidates Are Getting Their Money
Many people (probably almost everyone who will read this post) have enough money to eat just about any kind of food they want for dinner tonight. Imagine the endless possibilities! You can go to a market and discover a whole new world. The internet can teach you how to bring it to your own house. For a little bit more, you could go to a fancy restaurant. For a one time treat, most here could easily afford to eat dinner prepared by a famous chef.

Despite this, how many will choose fast food tonight?

Fast food, sit-coms on TV, no exercise, same boring commute every day, same conversations with the same people every day. All of these things are well within our control. Do we lack imagination, or something else? Even without his fortune, we can all share in his misfortune ;-)

P.S. My boss once told me about someone who would buy anyone a hamburger in exchange for a good story. Not really, that expensive IMHO (cheaper than a movie!).
I contacted my MP in the UK a while ago .The reply was "our party view is X, thats what we will be representing in parliment". I wrote back expaining that I didn't believe that was how representative democracy was suposed to work. Doubt it made any dfference.
Three Days with Java: Day 2
If the people are asserting themselves in situations they may have sat quietly in the past, that sounds like more of a heroic mentality than a victim mentality.
He makes some good points that are worthy of more thought and consideration.

It does seem dated, though. The point about experts not being really free to express themselves is well taken, but the idea that knowledge is being hoarded makes no sense in the Youtube era.

In the last month I've watched videos on how to grind your own optics, make a vacuum chamber to aluminize them, etc. etc. We're in the middle of a creative explosion.
I'm fairly sure this applies only to SDR transmitters, not receivers.
I did not:

> And nothing you've said in this apologist answer has come close to addressing that, you're just dancing around it.

I said the answer was apologist, not the individual.

I myself post apologist answers all the time (justifications for controversial positions), but I don't consider myself an apologist broadly speaking. I also don't presume that the above poster is an "apologist" even if I do consider this singular post "apologist" in nature.
The assumption in your question is that anyone who has done any research can only possibly agree with you.

I'm not assuming that. Any amount of research could be no research or close to none. People who have done very little research shouldn't opine. People who have done lots of research are more likely to be correct.

News flash: it is possible for informed people to disagree.

Well of course. Someone who's barely informed can disagree with someone who is far more informed. That would be two informed people disagreeing.

If someone has done adequate research and I'm correct, they must agree with me, otherwise the amount of research wouldn't be adequate or I must be wrong. I can avoid being wrong by avoiding having strong opinions on things I don't understand or know much about it.
I appreciate your comment, but I would also like to draw attention to the inherent difficulty in speaking about these concepts.

In speaking of being "innocent of evil" you also imply being "innocent of good" and so can good truly manifest itself, in the light of self-responsibility, in the face of innocence from it?

Further, you want to speak of "scientific knowledge" as separate from the knowledge of "good and evil", but Saul's identification of six qualities (common sense, creativity, ethics, intuition, memory, and reason) are all in some sense well-springs of knowledge: they guide our action, the way we exercise our agency, and so they way in which we conceive our self-responsibility.

I feel in no way, in bringing up the tree of knowledge, is Saul attacking Judeo-Christianity. He is articulating, instead, the manipulation of scripture, in its narrow interpretation, to the meet the ends of the elite.

In fact, there is something inexorable about eating from the tree, as I argue it is what enables good, but dualities abound, and so with it comes evil, but to only see one side of it is deception.

It is not only "the fall" of man, but also "the ascent."
They do - If you have a Google Play Music subscription. That enables the option to continue playing videos in the background, though I believe you have to set it in the settings page.
Firebreaks and Rapid Repairs
Stationary relative to what? And remember the earth is rotating...
I'm not sure if you guys are familiar with how Notch left Mojang, but he basically went home like it was completely normal and didn't say good bye to the people he'd been working with on Minecraft[1].

That's what you have to understand when you're reading these tweets: this is not a normal individual that understands typical human behavior. He has always had trouble connecting to people, and no surprise, money doesn't fix that. Remove everything else, he'd be an awesome guy to hang out with and talk about video games, but he wouldn't really know how to have a conversation around the typical personalities of this forum, since he isn't an entrepreneur by nature. For most of us, all we ever really talk about when meeting other people are: 1) Our own businesses; 2) Their businesses; 3) How we/they/everyone should start a business -- we get absolutely pumped about these topics. That's how this guy is with video games, and it makes it difficult to connect to the people who he's supposed to hang out with due to the social standing his money has given him. Why? Because the people who have made that much money almost always come from the entrepreneurial mindset, since a business is what usually took them there (or a business on top of their fame).

So, I hope Notch will somehow develop an understanding of the world that allows him to become immune to what others think he ought to be and what he ought to do, and instead he just becomes like Wozniak and becomes content with himself. It definitely won't happen if he continues to use social media as an outlet, instead of making real human connections that aren't focused on partying and spending his money. I don't imagine him getting there, though, since it seems like he isn't growing the fortitude required to handle the responsibility of the wealth he's developed. It's always painful for me to see people unable or unwilling to help themselves, and in that regard this shows that a billionaire can be in the same emotional place as a person living on the street.

[1] http://www.inquisitr.com/1589883/minecraft-officially-owned-...
This looks like a lot of fun. Here are some entertaining videos from shut up and sitdown that seem to capture what its all about.

http://www.shutupandsitdown.com/videos/v/susd-play-megagame-...

http://www.shutupandsitdown.com/videos/v/watch-skies-2-pt-2/
>Please link to the documentation about this on Microsoft's site.

Here are a few:

http://social.technet.microsoft.com/wiki/contents/articles/3...

Mailing list: https://cabforum.org/pipermail/public/2015-August/005847.htm...

http://social.technet.microsoft.com/wiki/contents/articles/1...
The Dictionary of Obscure Sorrows
Obviously very few. The technical literacy of drug purchasers is fairly low, and the tools are very difficult to use. If your point is that "no one goes online to buy drugs" then you must not understand how adoption curves work, or you must believe that the growth in this market is shrinking.
The site is back now.
Dekay+Agencies
I think I agree with you. The c2 website could be less painful to read. However, the diatribe is near perfect. It fits the content very well.
+Dinning+Table+Set+5+Piece+Dinning+Room+Kitchen+Table+and+Chair+Set+|
Actually not. This is your explanation for what emotion is, based on your scientific framework. It is not some kind of absolute truth. Given that you have no explanation for consciousness, there is a limit to your framework when it comes to explaining emotion.
The bigger takeaway from this is with a system like this (fully managed by Windows Updates).. how can you remove certificates you don't trust?

Latest documentation for this seems to be for IE 5. I sure as hell like to run dkpkg-reconfigure ca-certificates every once in a while after some roots get compromised and don't trust Microsoft to be on the ball.
Here's the next article in the series:

http://slpopejoy.github.io/posts/Effectful02.html
That's a bit pedantic but sure. Here it is fixed:

> If you can do numeric arithmetic on it, it's a number.
Yes. Infact, a JavaScript Promise is pretty much the same as the IO monad* - the `then` method is a lot like `bind`. Promise.resolve is a lot like `return`

* almost the same to IO, because of recursive thenable assimilation, something that was added to promises but is totally short-sighted and unnecessary; and because promises are eager which means they don't represent the action to be executed, but the value of an already executed action
Hello, Citizen! Friend Computer wishes you to know that sarcasm is treason. Treason is punishable by death.
I found confirmation time to be very fast. For small transactions (less than $100), it'd make less sense to confirm. For bigger transactions, it'd make sense to wait for 30 or 50 minutes.
The myth of interference – Internet architect David Reed explains how bad science created the broadcast industry.

http://www.salon.com/2003/03/12/spectrum/
Ритуальные+услуги+–+работа+компетентных+людей
Back here in the real world we understand that the most cost effective manner for device manufactuers to comply with this moronic regluation is to lock down the entire device.

What real world do you live in? Because in the real world I live in, the kind of component and firmware we're really talking about here are probably bought in as a ready-made part by whoever makes that phone, laptop, router, etc. They might not have any access to reprogram it at all.

What these kinds of regulations are effectively saying that if they do have that ability then for the device to remain properly certified for use as required by the regulatory authority there must be safeguards to prevent certain types of potentially harmful change or you "void the warranty" from a regulatory point of view. In that case, you revert to the default position you were in anyway, which is that you have to get the device and its software properly approved before you can lawfully use it.
Yep. Linear amplifiers are absolutely terrible at spewing noise all over the RF range. Growing up, I lived about a quarter mile from the freeway, and there were times where certain TV channels were absolutely unwatchable due to interference from these rather illegal setups.
No it's not. But it can be. The infrastructure can be developed on top of bitcoin (see Silkroad). And failure (silkroad, mtgox...) doesn't mean the end. It actually spawned better services on these domains.

It just takes time until people (or criminals) learn and adopt the technology.
It is possible to implement monad-like behavior in javascript. But javascript does not have a type system to model them in.

Haskell is great because it's type system is rich enough to represent these concepts and not only that but enforce their usage (to a degree). Unfortunately this is like a drug, once you get a good dose of Haskell it's easy to crave an even richer type system with dependent types.
"Requires we give up free will" sure done.

...

In other words it still works. Note, it needs not be 100% accurate simulation. If it's good enough we can't tell.

Not that I think reality works this way, but the goal is to look for ways that a theory falls down, not look for evidence in support of a theory.

PS: FTL communication also works as a means to sidestep the need for a lot of quantum weardness. Sure, we don't like it but that does not mean it can't be happening.
But the foundation of convincing investors is to seem formidable, and since this isn't a word most people use in conversation much, I should explain what it means. A formidable person is one who seems like they'll get what they want, regardless of whatever obstacles are in the way. Formidable is close to confident, except that someone could be confident and mistaken. Formidable is roughly justifiably confident.

Does Formidable = Nice?

http://paulgraham.com/convince.html
I can't believe that there's any possibility of banks doing anything of value on the Bitcoin blockchain when they could easily coopt the blockchain tech and set up trusted miners. The public immutable ledger with full transaction history is obviously interesting to Wall St. but what are the chances any of these banks will trust anything of value to the current ideological devs of a ~$3B commodity controlled entirely by unknown Chinese miners? The underlying notional of anything interesting on Wall St. is measured in trillions.. Can you imagine them suffering through the squabbling with the block size debate or hoping that miners don't collude to roll back the last month's transactions?
There are services to launder and mix your bitcoins. There are also people that don't care about privacy but are more concerned of the bank ability to freeze their account.
I enjoyed this explanation of monads in Ruby: http://codon.com/refactoring-ruby-with-monads
You are not the only one criticizing IQ tests. Even Theodor Adorno had his problems with those tests. Some even claim that the whole IQ research is not very scientific at all. An IQ test for example is considered good if there is a Gaussian distribution present in the results it produces when applied to a large set of people. However, we still don't know if human intelligence is actually Gaussian distributed. The only proof you can find are such IQ tests, which actually are designed with this very pattern in mind. It's like asking a question with the answer already in mind.

I guess with the creation of phrases like "emotional IQ" and "cognitive IQ" even the research expressed its doubt that those tests can truly hold their promises. Freerk Huisken might be right in the end. He argued that it's a logical problem when one is trying to measure intelligence in artificial test as they can not retrieve the true capabilities of a human. Intelligence is a damn complicated subject and although we humans love to measure and categorize everything, we should consider that IQ tests are far from being comparable. Truth is, we still do not understand what intelligence actually is :)

This is actually a nice topic to discuss with philosophers.
I'm pointing to Bitcoin utility and possible applications. Sure you can have a great idea, or philosophy but that doesn't mean people will adopt it or it'll be successful.
Australia is 23m inhabitants. I doubt it has much power to counter any trend or push made by the USA.