skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
The important part isn't money, it's time.

Go see the wonders of the world. Be in awe.

I would suggest India because it's a microcosm. Go north to the Himalayas and you can feel the majesty. Head to the west to the slums of Mumbai and you will understand poverty. Maybe go learn to meditate out there at a vipassana center. Visit Agra and the goggle at the opulence of the Taj Mahal. Then head to Varanasi and experience the rawness. Maybe you'll even see a miracle or two if you're lucky. Go to Hampi and see giant boulders stacked on top of each other like lego and be bewildered. Stay in a palace just for the hell of it. Take a motorcycle through small villages and be greeted by the children who've never seen anyone so pale or so dark. Sleep in a tent in the deserts of Rajasthan. Visit the holy places and wonder at the peacefulness.

But then again, India isn't for everyone, but it does have everything.
The URL was mangled but I think we fixed it.
San Francisco Request for Information – New Voting System
Very sad that social surveillance systems like facebook are taking off in these uneducated minds. Firefox OS should contribute to liberating these people by enabling mesh apps... https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10120722
He has ~$300m in listed liquid assets. Estimates peg it at maybe half that in freely available cash or equivalents. He could easily leverage his real estate assets for some money as needed. A billion would push him to the red line though. He's blustering of course, he won't risk it all for this run. He's currently acting to raise money from voters precisely because he can't actually afford to fund his campaign the whole way.
Grate tool for build one page dynamic website, :) #OnePager
If working with emacs, clj-refactor in CIDER can do renaming of symbols.

Of course, renaming symbols in Clojure is not such a big requirement as in Java IDE, because most of the things are isolated within a single function in Clojure. Consequently, renaming symbols is just a convenience feature, not a must-have feature for Clojure development.
Awesome tool for build one page dynamic website. :)
#OnePager
Driver Magician 4.7 Crack, Keygen and Serial Key
I wonder if the nominee would offer Trump a position in their administration in exchange for not running as an independent, and if Trump would give a shit.
When you formulate it so, the problem is the question itself, as, except if we are religious believers, we don't have any reason to consider a "soul" (or a "consciousness") to be a "nonphysical entity." Look at the etymology of the "psyche:" it's "the breath." At the time people explained their environment unscientifically they considered that the existence of "breath" makes the difference between the dead and the living person but also between the conscious and the unconscious bodies. Animals do breathe too. But humans saw themselves as "special" in their religious setup. As a kid would ask "does my dog go to heaven too when he dies?" See, we go deeper and deeper in religious explanations which just postulate something non-existing (once you accept nonphysical soul, it's easier to believe in heaven or reincarnation or whatever). Now go back and ask, if you believe that the only thing we can "see" around us that doesn't have the "physical entity" is the "soul" of humans why do you do so? Are humans by any way "the chosen ones" in the animal world, looking at their physical bodies and the processes in them? The scientific view doesn't see them so. The human "consciousness" is, so observed, more complex than the "consciousness" of the crow on the lawn due to the more complex brain, but both of these can be explained as the function of their physical "hardware" (the body and the brain) and the interaction with the environment. The "consciousness" as a "neurological process by which the animal or the human sees it as special, the center of its attention in order to protect itself" can be seen as a product of evolution. (And now I have a weird feeling of explaining a grown up person that Santa doesn't exist). So it looks that we humans, if we don't destroy ourselves first, will be able to eventually produce a "conscious" computer. (Hal, open the door, please).

(I've mentioned crows just to be able to link to https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZerUbHmuY04 )
I don't think pgp ever can provide validation that some person owns some email address. You're signing the uid/address on a key which people prove they control. You can ask them to send you a signed message from that address to prove it, but if they owned someone's key, they likely have access to the email too. Even if they don't emails are still very easy to spoof.

Regarding changing the uid, your scenario cannot happen (if I understand it correctly): you sign uids, not the keys themselves. That means you can sign specific uids. If they delete it and add another uid, it's not signed anymore. (also you can revoke signatures if someone starts misbehaving)
- re. anonymous keys. There is no need for them to be part of the web of trust. If you really want them there it is then a common requirements for signatories to require at least a verifiable e-mail address bound to the person they know and are authenticating. But then arguably it's not very anonymous any more.

- re. multiple identities. cross-Signatures in the web of trust are done on individual identities, not the master key! So if you sign an identity and the key owner then creates another, that new identity will not carry your signature.

- re. key parties: so far it wasn't an issue because it was implicitly assumed that people attending a key parting were savvy enough to understand how to sign. For PGP to be democratized the concept of key party needs to evolve. I personally combine them with a small lecture on PGP use, and say "you get to sign each other only if you have attended the lecture including its small practical".

- re. software keys. These are typically considered as an extension to the developers' keys. You as a user shouldn't sign those.
See https://wiki.mozilla.org/WebExtensions#Additional_APIs

There's valid criticisms against WebExtensions, but the biggest misconception is that the capabilities of WebExtensions are set in stone and that X or Y addon "won't be possible". The entire point of announcing WebExtensions so early was to start getting feedback on what needs to be supported to make major and useful addons possible, and to start work on a way for experimentation outside of the officially supported spec to still happen.
Url changed from http://www.technologyreview.com/view/539856/this-is-what-con..., which points to this.
Responsibility in Software Development Teams Part 2
This gets back to the OP's original point, the need for a differentiation between PhDs between "My accomplishment is name recognition" and "I have done the work, I just didn't fill out out an application form first".
"CLIM is interesting and was the last attempt to do any kind of research on how user interfaces should be built, but is not a viable option in 2015." -hmmm, what!?

Am I the only one left who thinks that gui widgets without a context (think qt, gtk) lead to inconsistent and inferior interfaces? If anything, since it is the _last_ attempt at GUI research, then we should continue from there. Or not, if we think that the Unity/Metro are THE interfaces...
Thanks for your answers!
A question I always ask myself for products I'm building and products I'm thinking about is: "If I removed this product from my life or my user's life, how hurt or upset would they be?" I think this is a good frame for answering that questions as well.

If a startup is a nice to have, where if you have the extra cash it adds a layer of convenience, those companies will be more likely to fail than the ones who are the core of a user's lifestyle.

I think good examples of this are companies like Box, which is extremely integrated into many company processes. Slack is another great example. Companies rely on this for their communication. Removing it is like removing a key piece of a company. On the consumer side, Honest Company has become a staple to many people's lifestyles. Perhaps Spotify, which I know many people refuse to switch from simply because they have invested time and resources into getting it just how they like it.
I was thinking through that same scenario the other day, but came to the conclusion that The Donald's ego is far too large to ever accept anything but the Presidency.

My guess is that we'll see a Clinton/Bush general election with a 3rd party spoiler. Again.
International hops make the traffic less illegally intercepted by domestic espionage organizations...?
It's difficult to tell from your site - does it still use FUSE under the hood or is this a kernel-level FS? I'd check the RPMs if I could, but I can't download the RPM without signing up first.
Plix (Easy album sharing)
Plix lets you instantly share entire photo albums privately with the people who matter the most, as well as request photos from them that they might have never shared.
I'm at 47.91 average impact for FF 40.0 with uBlock Origin and Ghostery, no Flash installed. Doing local web development and poking around some news sites to read about all these market crashes. Only a few tabs open at a time for me.
No, but a working GUI is better than a non-working GUI.
not yet, i will check with them on twitter
Veer Bahadur Singh Purvanchal University
I don't get it why Clojure and other Lisp tutorials throw things like this in face of beginners:

(reduce + (map (comp inc inc) (range 10)))

instead of just using things like the "->" macro to make the damn thing just as in any other language:

(-> (range 10)
(map #(+ % 2))
(sum))

...it's as if they purposely try to scare people away from Lisp! Some kind of smug superiority makes them wanna make sure no "lesser mortals" want to touch their beloved language. (The added benefit would be that later you can "blow their minds" but showing them how to write "->" themselves and instantly introduce them to the power of macros!)

This is almost close to showing a code snippet like this to someone trying to learn Haskell:

fix$(<$>)<$>(:)<*>((<$>((:[{- thor's mother -}])<$>))(=<<)<$>(*)<$>(*2))$1

(it only prints the powers of 2, but it was enough to scare some people into calling Haskell “the Taliban version of ML”... http://www.theregister.co.uk/Print/2012/12/21/financial_soft...)

...really, people, stop scaring learners away!
This is great! I have been using iPython notebook (as a biologist) for some months now and "getting a feel for the data" is very important. This notebook is littered with handy Python one liners to quickly gain insight into the data.

I love iPython notebook, I can run the entire back-end on our cluster while working with terabytes of data on my laptop tethered to my phone from a moving train (as we speak ;)).

Edit: Now using your code directly on my own data, I'm learning a lot, a big thanks to Randal S. Olson!!
But can't they also talk to each other over CB radio? Seems like that would make it safer. And of course it's a lot easier to see a truck right behind you than it is to see a car.
Don't click it
First principles I guess, although I sure love `->` and its siblings.
It depends on whom you ask.

As a person who doesn't even know what language this is written in, I don't think it is readable at all. For example, this "Select(i => i + 2)" piece looks totally strange for me. What does it do?

After learned Lisp, I feel there's too much syntax to learn for non-lisp languages. Every language introduces some idiosyncratic syntax. Life is too short, I just don't want to learn syntax that someone else invented to just be able to say "this is different".
Personally? I'd take a One Year trip solo. That's the only way to spend that much money traveling.

I bet I could spend upwards of $2k in four weeks if I really tried, but honestly the places you'd have to stay and the things you'd have to spend your time doing would just be way too unpleasant. Think Cruise Ships, Hotels where people are wearing their Yachting Clothes, God forbid, Guided Tours.

It's just not worth it. Either save most of your money or find a way to get the rest of that year off, then go out and have some real fun
Best PHP Framework for 2015 – PHP MVC Framework Trends
They really need to sort out their notification system - I logged in and had ~200 notifications, it just instantly caused me stress and I closed the tab.
Interstellar was right. Falling into a black hole is not the end says S. Hawking
Also https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10121227, https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10120594.
Nothing is terrible, I suppose, but in the web client I personally enjoy the fast search, filtering, labeling, split pane smart inboxes, integration with Calendar, modal keyboard shortcuts (they aren't operative when you're typing in a text box but are active otherwise) and non-intrusive threading (conversation-view).

The fact that all this is the same on my Macbook Pro, on my Arch Linux desktop, or when I reboot to Windows, without any effort on my part to synchronize settings makes this all rather excellent.
My main issue is that search and labels just don't work as well as in gmail webapp.

Also, I'm sending 90% of emails from my phone anyway and I don't know of any good client that works both with gmail (with transparent caching of recent/viewed messages) and gpg.
Retweet 0.2: Twitter bot to retweet all tweets from a user
By this argument, if I shipped a customized emacs with e.g. C-c for copy C-v for paste and C-q for quit, and slime and sbcl bundled inside, that would make slime as accessible as eclipse/intellij/visual studio?

I'm willing to try it (really not that hard to do), but I bet good money that many people would still balk because it's spelled E-M-A-C-S.
In clojure you would typically write it as:

(->>
(range 10)
(map #(+ % 2))
(reduce +))

Which is just as readable as the .net equivalent.
You probably need to post this using a different phrase than "brain rape", which is likely to make the thread be about the title.
You're rolling up several issues here.

1) It's none of the Government's business what smoking rates are. All that should matter to the Government is whether smokers are being lied to about cigarettes, i.e., whether their rights are being violated.

2) Some of the FUD was fraud, and thus should be the subject of a) lawsuits, and b) criminal charges.

3) The rest of it wasn't fraud, as you correctly point out, and therefore ought to be legal.

4) Individuals had no hope of picking out the truth of this is patently untrue. Many individuals did.
That's interesting; probably a learning-style difference, but the one time I tried a -koans (ruby-koans in this case), I found it to be a very inefficient way to learn.
Nice writeup. Complex protocol like this always makes me wonder, how do people even test it?
Very cool.. here in India even for on premise jobs thats a distant dream
As disclaimer, I've been a Scala zealot for the last 3 years. On Clojure vs Scala, usually comparisons are kind of unfair I think. As somebody interested in FP, I tried Clojure first. And FP being all about immutable data-structures, pure functions operating on immutable data-structures and dealing with side-effects explicitly by means of abstractions such as the I/O Monad, I expected to see that in Clojure, seeing how people describe it as being very FP.

And it was like a big WTF for me seeing how for example everything in Clojure is a Var that can be changed. And eventually I got it, I mean Clojure is a LISP and it's meant to be compiled by a REPL and the unit of compilation is not a file and this is in LISP's tradition and so on and so forth. But it's still a WTF given its usual characterization. Even in Java classes are completely immutable (until you start manipulating bytecode of course) and you've got "final" declarations. You have no "final" in Clojure. And this is actually a pity because it (probably) means that those persistent data-structures can't be implemented in Clojure, as "final" on top of the JVM comes with a pretty cool contract in the Java Memory Model that you need. And then instead of Scala's implicit parameters, that are actually very explicit and type-checked by the compiler, in Clojure you have package-wide vars or refs that people manipulate as a poor man's dependency injection mechanism. And state changes are usually done by mutating atoms. Well that's cool, in Scala people also do that, but in Scala you also have a mature implementation of the I/O monad and monad transformers if you want it, or various FRP libraries. And I'm sure that Clojure has plenty of libraries, but overall I feel that in Scala the ecosystem of design patterns borrowed-from-Haskell is more mature.

Scala provides mutable variants of its data-structures in the standard library. But that's not extra rope to hang yourself, because in Clojure the use cases still exist and people end up using Java's mutable data-structures instead. In Scala the blend of OOP and FP can sound overwhelming, but it's actually the healthiest blend of FP + OOP to ever come up in a programming language. And in Clojure, just because you can't declare a class, that doesn't mean that OOP doesn't exist. It does and the blend is not healthy. This is why "reify" and "proxy" exist and are used quite frequently. And things like clojure.lang.ISeq are a Java OOP interface and not a protocol. Basically Scala is trying to make the best of OOP, whereas Clojure considers it a necessary evil of the host platform that it can't get rid of. Pick your poison.
If you start thinking along the lines of first principles you could just as well start with a NAND gate.

..because some people were even smart enough to pull this off: http://www.nand2tetris.org/ :)
All a PMU is, is a performance monitoring unit. It keeps track of CPU utilization and performance counters.

This is an extremely small part of the CPU, and yes, I can imagine they jettisoned a lot of stuff you find on modern cores because it takes up too much room.
Someone at FTC apparently did not grasp the concept of hierarchical domain system. That URL looks like a phishing attempt.
The idea that politics isn't conducive to a productive environment isn't strange. "Keep politics at home" is a phrase I've heard all my life. And it's advice that has deescalated many situations and got many non-productive time wasters back on track. I've been in (middle)management before, so I'm not just blowing smoke.
I would say I come from one of the Nordic countries.
I think it's incredibly hard to try to decipher what Trump really wants here, and how much that has potentially changed as he has become the lead candidate. He seems to regularly admit that he didn't expect to be leading (in his bizarre Trump-speech style). If that's the case, then initially he was in it just to stir the pot, and for the free publicity.

Personally I don't believe half his positions are real. I'm pretty sure the anti-immigration / wall building positions were mostly to fire up the excitable wing of the Republican party, to charge up an emotional issue. It instantly shot him into the spotlight, because many of the other candidates were trying to avoid offending latino voters and or trying to acquire their votes. He was a Democrat for a long time, and was pro-choice for a long time, then magically completely switches positions. I'm skeptical, I think it's far more likely he's happy to pretend to hold various positions as convenient. No different than Hillary and Obama switching positions on gay marriage when it was ideal to do so.

I think if it came down to it, and Trump couldn't be President, he'd much rather be back running his businesses, or on TV somewhere. Perhaps doing a new variation of his show. Anything else not only takes him out of his element, but would be stressful and time consuming with little upside (in regards to what Trump seems to usually wants: money, brand building, publicity).
Securing your IT infrastructure by securing your team [pdf]
There is a popular alternative as well, Raft. https://ramcloud.stanford.edu/wiki/download/attachments/1137...

Has anyone used both? What are the pros and cons?
I'd bet it was neither. It's something that clojure is doing right.
155 million native speakers.
I hope this gets implemented. A year ago or so we had several customers wanting to custom format output filenames and directories in a desktop application and we settled for something which is almost exactly this, so the {identifier:format spec} idea, and ever since implementing it I wish any language had it as we found it really convenient and having no apparant disadvantages in comparision with printf-%-style in C or Python/streams in C++/{}-style in C#/Python
Evasi0n Jailbreak iOS 6.1 Free Download Full Version
Which is more beautiful, haskell or clojure? This is a subjective question, so I'm hoping to read subjective and highly opinionated answers.
While the title is "Giant bags of mostly water", the subtitle is better for understanding what you are going to read.

An interesting quote is
"The most unprotected system
on your network is your
sysadmin's workstation."

Which is too true and an rather embarrassing for the admins way to get into the network.
The best way to find, hire freelance journalist
on premise 60 k is easy in India 80k is not difficult. Look for captives and most of them give work from home so it is like remote with standard income.
bitcoin is missing in the contents ? Maybe add as application of cryptography / case study
Sockpuppet voting and posting is forbidden here. We ban accounts and sites for this.
The only lattice methods that come to mind are asymmetric (subset sum and NTRU). What symmetric latticr methods are there?
Don't know if you were kidding but I think the implication was the combined mass was 1.2x your weight. Of course even then, that's still a pretty heavy bike (I think my commuter clocks in at about 10% of my weight)
> Even the whole lead in petrol thing is up in the air, we are not sure if it has made a difference

No, that's wrong. We know lead in petrol was very harmful to a lot of people.

The thing that is "up in the air" is whether lead in petrol was responsible for increased crime rates, especially increased violent crime rate; and whether removing lead feom petrol was responsible for the reduction in crime rates.

It's not an outlandish bizarre hypothesis because we know how harmful lead in atmosphere is.
It may go against my libertarian-conservative viewpoint to say so, but a Bernie or Trump Presidency would be welcomed -- simply because it would be great to have a President that pretty much tells the establishment to go ___ itself. For example it was fun watching Trump stand up to Jorge Ramos of Univision at the Iowa press conference yesterday and it has been great seeing a Sanders catch on fire on the progressive side of things. Regardless of your politics, I think most of us would agree that the status quo isn't acceptable anymore. However I would love it if a libertarian-leaning candidate were doing better, but my particular candidate doesn't seem to be able to break through the noise and get above 3%. Maybe he should wipe some email servers and smack around some reporters!