skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
The problem is not the "white labeling" but the copyright infringement itself.

When someone uploads a video to Youtube with the "Standard YouTube License" [1] he grants Youtube (and Youtube only) "a worldwide, non-exclusive, royalty-free, sublicenseable and transferable license to use, reproduce, distribute, prepare derivative works of, display, and perform the Content in connection with the Service and YouTube's (and its successors' and affiliates') business" but all other rights (and exceptions) given by copyright laws are reserved to the owner of said copyright.

Licensing viral videos is an emerging market nowadays, with companies like storyful [2] and Jukin Media [3] serving as a clearing house of sorts, licensing videos from the copyright owners and sublicensing them to the media outlets.

TV shows like Science of Stupid [4] (from NatGeo) and World's Craziest Fools [5] (among many others) make extensive use of these licensed clips to have enough material for many seasons.

Using an Youtube Video on a TV Show or News without licensing it first (even if properly credited) is for profit copyright infringement, in every sense analogous to counterfeit bags using trademark brands in the flea market.

[1] https://www.youtube.com/static?template=terms&gl=US

[2] http://storyful.com/

[3] https://www.jukinmedia.com/media-partners

[4] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Science_of_Stupid

[5] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World%27s_Craziest_Fools
git commit -F <(curl https://raw.githubusercontent.com/thiderman/doge/master/doge/static/doge.txt) # [0]

Oh god do I feel bad about this. What have I done?

[0] https://github.com/thiderman/doge
actually, this could be done by github for some extra buck.
One of the thing that annoyed me is that the language forces you to put your opening braces on the same line as your condition/loop. I like to have them on the same vertical line, I find it easier to see the blocks.
To anyone with any background at all in computer security, this is such a "duh" moment. If Sony et al can't secure their massively important corporate infrastructure, what are the odds your car's wireless computers are secure in any way? They aren't, they knew it, and you knew it. Sorry.

It'll be interesting to watch the fallout from these obviously-present vulnerabilities. I see three possible outcomes, in decreasing order of likelihood: status quo, where they just "fix" the bugs as they hit the news; some sort of massive push towards real computer security, in this and other industries; or a massive reduction in features to avoid the flaws.

This is really just another symptom of the current state of computer security, best described as "a joke." My guess is in 50 years we'll have decent computer security. There's nothing that precludes it in theory. But it's going to be an ugly, ugly couple of decades while we pay off the wave of computer-security-debt that we have been riding.
there is very little evidence that Snowden is qualified to advise anyone on cryptographic security

I think you're poisoning the well here. I haven't seen anyone suggest we should use Snowden as a technical advisor or anything of the sort.
That sucks, but I don't think your misfortune in this case has any relation to whether or not standups are useful. There's a good argument that moving out of context for five minutes helps to focus and keep the meeting short.
This course is taught by Andrew Ng. Professor Ng is not only one of the founders of Coursera, but is also a prof at Stanford and Chief Scientist at Baidu. Machine Learning (and Deep Learning in particular) is his specialty, so he is a pretty good resource on the topic :)
Top 5 Embarrassing Wedding Moments
Taxing the increase in one's wealth is neither a property tax nor an income tax. The taxable amount would be income minus consumption.

The deduction for living people was intended to account for a reasonable rate of retirement/emergency saving. Corporations don't need to retire, so they don't get it.
Is it just me or does everyone in the picture look younger than 30?
Yeah I'm pretty sure if you just stop going in to work they can fire you, resignation or no resignation.
The Master and Margarita and Wind Up Bird Chronicle are two of my favorite books at the moment, so this seems like a good bet. The way both authors blend physically/spatially/temporally distinct characters and settings into one narrative is very similar, and incredibly satisfying.
Estudio confirma alteraciones, al vivir cerca de las antenas base
Face Detection in Google Play Services
Sure, but it suggests a component hierarchy which blurs the already ambiguous line between view and controller. Which is why there's flux and all of its variants, and things like falcor in the works - the missing model in data-component architecture.
EC approves £50m support for R&D of an innovative space launcher engine (SABRE)
Moz: 2015 Ranking Factors Study
I personally prefer to way Go does it although there are other formatting standards that are enforced that bug me. However, even if I don't like everything I am somewhat fond of the fact that this actually enforced.
I never toss any of my OS install disks, because you never know. I think I still have Win3.1 on floppy in the closet somewhere.
There are advantages, yes, not denying that, but it seems vanishingly rare to find a packaging system that doesn't have this problem, and that's frustrating in particular for a programmer when almost every single language you use doesn't have an up-to-date package and winds up requiring an external install that then isn't even necessarily version tracked.

And I do wonder at the security implications of that. Some of the more popular languages like Python get semi-regular security updates even on stable branches like Debian's, but then I see stuff like Racket still being on 5.2 which came out in 2011 and I have to wonder how that affects the security profile if some "stable" package you've installed is depending on a scripting language package that still has a vulnerability in it because the package in "stable" hasn't been updated in half a decade.
> For me it opened my mind to what is possible with a GC enabled systems programming language and made me delve into Modula-3

Also, if you like Modula-3, you'll probably love Nim.

It's also a GC-enabled systems programming language (someone even redid the OSdev minimal kernel in Nim), and the official FAQ lists Modula-3 as its top influence (in practice, it feels like Modula-3 semantics mapped to Python syntax).
That's a false idea, I think. I don't interact with all of the other people on my project team every day, but there are still dependencies and useful bits of knowledge that can be exchanged in outline at the beginning of the day. The standup is for all team members, managers and developers included.

Frankly, I think other departments would really benefit from daily standups. The reason they don't is likely because they're not a workflow where there are multiple small, distinct deliverables – which benefits the most from this approach.
Any plan on supporting fitbit ?
I'm always tossing in Markdown code and realising (after the edit window's expired) that I effed up

QED.

And I knew I was doing it as I wrote it, forgot to clean it up.

Sigh.

What I'd really prefer is that sites simply said "hey, what's your preferred markup language" and offered the choice....
Then why is he advising the IETF? :)
The one guy in the long-sleeve button-up shirt might be in his 30s or 40s.
> I always thought "off the grid" meant that you were completely self sufficient. What's the difference in relying on water being delivered by pipe and water being delivered by truck?

I think the difference is that one is delivered by a "grid" and one isn't, hence "off the grid".

You seem to have mixed that concept up with self-sufficiency. For example, someone with a diesel generator for electricity could be described as "off the grid" though they'd need to take delivery of that fuel.

edit: I see this same semantic discussion took place in another thread a couple of hours before this one.
Tesla's at least on top of their software updates, and I believe they designed some more sensible separation of systems than most cars.

For affordable options, I have no idea.
Something with no wireless features at all(I think the no-feature nissan versa might be that way?). Not because their manufacturer cares about security, but because of less attack vectors.
Simplicity by leaving everything switched off by default, but still sendmail and BIND the default MTA and DNS server. I know OpenSMTPd has come in now, but I still never found out why djb's tools weren't first class citizens and default.
The practice is discriminatory against anyone who is disabled or has suffered an injury and can't stand in one spot for even a few minutes. Moving to a conference room is moving out of context.
There _should_ be no difference, but who knows? Who can be sure?

MS probably doesn't even know. I recall reading that there were 6 different versions of the Service Pack update for Office 2000 depending on where you got them from, and they weren't all compatible with each other. Do you think after another decade of Monkey Boy and his winning business strategy of pitting all the departments against each other that they've improved? Nardella actually seems like a grown-up, but he's still a dyed-in-the-wool Microsoft exec.... less stupid certainly, but just as evil.

One of the biggest problems with Microsoft is that they are too big and disorganized. They have no vision, and no guiding principle, other than maintaining the lingering shreds of their monopoly. This is obvious from looking at the designed-by-committee, piecemeal UI for Windows, which is getting worse every release and not better. The best you can hope for for any particular feature from release to release is that it's just arbitrarily different and not broken or hidden or completely removed.

Windows clearly peaked with XP, but their UI peaked with Windows 2000. The only reason 7 is liked is because they backed off most of the bad things they did with Vista, and the only thing, the _only_ thing I think is better in Windows 8 than any previous version is Task Manager, which is not something I use often. But it is nice.

My #1 wish for Windows post-7 is that I could just use the "Classic" theme, but apparently Windows is now too sophisticated to do what it could do 15 years ago. Their UX department has gone totally off the rails or maybe was taken over by wild monkeys. Microsoft used to be _the_ place for good UI design back in the 90s. They were very scientific about it, and their designs were very well-thought out, based on CUA, and an absurd amount of user-testing and most of all, consistent. Not perfect, but they were very good. But as soon as graphics cards could do more than 256 colors and Photoshop was invented, everyone went wild and UI became the lawless, Wild West funhouse it remains today. Except in the past few years, everyone decided that the "flat look" is cool (news flash: it's ugly and hard to make out) and now we have UIs that are as usable and good-looking as Windows 2, but without the consistency.

I'd thought Microsoft had run out of sharks to jump with Windows 8, but they keep finding more. But here's the thing. I still like Windows. I just wish I could make Windows look at work like it did when it looked and worked well (I'm not referring to the underlying technology, which is presumably improving all the time, although I still think Windows 8 is absurdly slow compared to 7 and much worse compared to XP... and I have empirical evidence. I do a lot of work in a Windows 2003 VM running on VirtualBox (long story) and it's much faster than the Windows 7 host and doesn't suffer from the, oh gee, everything's going to go "Not Responding" for 30 seconds to 2 minutes for no apparent reason that I see with the apps (at least MS apps) on the host.
As that tweet pretty clearly says, what they're rolling out soon is highway autosteer (a.k.a. automatic lane keeping) and automatic parallel parking. "Summon" mode (having the car drive to you by itself) is not coming any time soon.
Behavioral Profiling Could Forever Change Online Anonymity
My question is if VW has switched the affected stuff in newer models since they found out about the issues?
As far as my limited understanding goes using the the key fob for remote central locking does not expose any risk, instead its the immobiliser part, so manually opening your door with the physical key provides no extra safety, its when the key is present near the ignition barrel, thats where the immobiliser kicks in and where this venerability exists
Just don't opt for the "smart key" option, on most models it's an optional extra.

Radio keys should be OK although they have their own security risk.
we measured this at our last startup anonymously; seems there is some research behind it. we didn't have enough data points to really gather much meaning out of it though.

http://www.aamga.org/files/hr/MetaAnalysis_Q12_WhitePaper_20...
You can't use methodology to change what is largely a people-problem. Your projects are failing not because you didn't have daily status meetings correctly, they're failing because your organization has a culture of lying to itself about work. Thinking you can fix that by fixing daily status meetings is a symptom of that culture.

A daily status meeting is about seeing what is going on, comparing that to what needs to happen, and changing course if necessary. You don't need a checklist of how to do that. If you can't figure out how to communicate with people you see every day on those points, then I don't know if you're clever enough to figure out how to write code in the first place. You're fired. Pack up your things and get out.

I've seen way too many organizations use "we're standing up" to mean "therefore, we're having a productive meeting". I've seen places do 50-person standup meetings. Yes, they would go two hours. I've seen other places get the number of people right but do full-status-report standup meetings. Yes, they would also go two hours. That's a quarter of your work day, probably half of your productive work day, just wasted on an emotionally draining process.

Last time I had daily status meetings that worked, I had my entire team in one room, we had a large whiteboard with every task we were working on between us, and when everyone got in, had their coffee, got through their emails, I would turn around in my chair, ask if everyone was ready, and we'd just go through the list. We would scratch things off when they'd get finished, so we always knew who was getting what done anyway, and everyone had their names next to what they were working on, so we knew what they were working on already. It was mostly just a chance for someone to ask for help on something. It took about 15 minutes. If new tasks didn't fit on the board, they didn't fit in the team's workload.

I think there is something to be said for not placing the focus on individual contributors but on the tasks as a whole, on the team as a whole. My meetings didn't pit people against each other, "oh, Jim got 3 things done yesterday and has never been blocked on 1 thing for over a week, but Dave has made zero progress on his task since two days ago. Shame, Dave, shame. Let us not question whether the task was specified correctly or appropriately broken down."
Having a daily short, informal, morning meeting certainly helps us. You don't need to be standing up to have "standup". Dogma for dogma's sake is the king of anti-patterns.
The attack vectors available for use against a corporation is infinitely larger than those available for a car. It's not really a fair comparison.
http://thesweetsetup.com/category/sweet-setup-interview/ though it's for Mac/iPhone
In VW's defence it sounds like they just sourced the parts from Megamos who is ultimately responsible for the flaw
Standup was never part of Agile:

http://www.agilemanifesto.org/principles.html
Github should ship something in order to replace this lists/awesome/best etc. This should be replaced by explore feature.
i do not understand why jamendo does not get more attention. it feels to me like they have found a sweet spot in the music distribution platform landscape.
I don't mind that, after years of working in languages like Clojure, CoffeeScript, Python and Haskell (mostly for personal projects, at work I use C++/C#/Java) I now see braces as syntactic noise and use indentation to see the blocks. But that's just a matter of preferences.

I'm more curious about Go on a semantical level. What does it make practical and idiomatic?
Tesla? It seems that they do understand the risks and invest in security more then others.
Ethics aside, that's pretty neat actually. That's like ordering a linkfarm SEO package as a Xmas gift for your competitors :)
Would love to play with it in Toronto - hope it gets here soon!
Great I'll give it priority then in my bookmark!
Working on it now and hopefully I'll get it committed this morning.

EDIT: Done and PR filed: https://github.com/jnv/lists/pull/41

Raw CSV blob available at: https://github.com/minimaxir/lists/blob/5c5f1ea22db00be5c8ca...
Releasing sensitive information concerning international information collection under the premises of releasing "domestic spying". He said he would only release domestic related information? What happened. Not true. Wake up people he was the best Russian sleeper agent to date.

You can Run ED but you can't hide.
Only one day to go for giving feedback on India's Net Neutrality plans
Wait until Teslas become cheaper.

Until then, buy a Lada Niva. No one will want to steal it and it doesn't have anything complicated in it that can be hacked.
I find that the daily standup is frequently a waste of time though often (maybe 1-2 times a week) issues I hadn't known about are brought to the fore. On a small team, I figure that if someone really needs something, they will reach out to the appropriate people to get it. This reduces communication overhead unless the whole team is required to make a decision.

I can see value in doing a standup somewhere between 1-3 times a week, but 5 times a week, unless everyone needs to work closely together on time sensitive issues seems excessive. The idea of everyone doing paperwork every day to be prepared for a low value meeting kind of gives me a headache. It seems like the opposite of lithe and agile.
What if Dropbox had applied to YCF?
@mluskind - Absolutely. Phasing out launch as you might imagine.
So has VW taken advantage of the time given to them by the courts to release fixed transponders in new vehicles and slowly replace the current defective ones as part of a routine service?

Otherwise they've just delayed the information getting out which seems pointless?
I think something akin to a Land Value Tax is a better option since I believe both income and capital improvements should not be taxed be it a factory owner adding capacity to said factory or your grandma adding solar panels to the roof of her house. Property and income taxes are probably the worse offenders in terms of punishing people who improve their standing in life. But I doubt state and local governments will ever support LVT or anything close to it.
Perhaps you weren't aware that Microsoft has a monopoly. They've been milking that since the early 90s. Sure, they lost that iron grip on mobile, but they are still a monopoly on the desktop. The number of organizations that aren't part of the Office Hegemony, and therefore Windows, is still a very small number. If you get rid of the Apple marketshare, it's probably in the low single-digits, percentage-wise... if it even breaks 1%.
"The Nature of Code" is a book I've heard repeated is pretty good.

It's free to browse online if your interested:

http://natureofcode.com/book/chapter-10-neural-networks/
Since Windows 8, Windows has used "virtual images" of the Operating System and has had the ability to rather than apply a bunch incremental updates instead just "build jump" to the higher build. You see this somewhat often in Windows Phone (given the way OEMs test and hold back phone updates, nearly every update seemed to be a "build jump") and up until recently not quite often in Windows. (8.1 and 8.1 Update 1, the "service packs" appeared to be "build jumps", but to my knowledge that's about it as far as 8 has used it in its servicing lifetime thus far.) With Windows 10 insiders have already seen a lot of "build jumps", particularly in the last few weeks leading up to the Windows 10 launch. I've got a feeling (and this is entirely supposition on my part) that one of the things we Insiders saw a Preview of and may not have realized it is that Windows 10 itself as a part of the "last version" thing will start to do a lot more "build jump" rollups of updates, even more often than the "service packs" of 8.
You could always use a club:
http://www.amazon.com/Club-1000-Original-Steering-Wheel/dp/B...

But anyone waiting to spend 30 minutes with an electronic crack is also smart enough to use liquid nitrogen to crack this too.

The difference is that a keyless hack can look natural since there is no physical force for entry or ignition. A funnel and chisel would raise some eyebrows.
Russian antivirus firm faked malware to harm rivals – Ex-employees
ITT: nobody so far advocating "responsible disclosure", because this is the sort of vendor abusiveness that made "full disclosure" clearly a good idea, and an essential protection for the interests of the end user.

The Internet of Things will recapitulate all the painful experience of how this stuff works out we just spent twenty years getting sorted out in the software field.
Why Square Sellers Can Rest Easy About the Liability Shift
Seconded. My (non-backlit) Kindle really doesn't feel like I'm reading from a screen. It's a totally different experience from reading on my phone or laptop.
The point being that the amount of available exploits shows it is far from being secure.
I drive a Hyundai Accent with manual windows and doors.

No one is going to crack that but a guy with the right piece of plastic can still take down a window, get in, and steal the car. If someone wanted to murder me, they'd need physical access to the car to mess with it.

So...yeah. No situation is 100% safe or secure. However, pretty much anything wireless pretty much guarantees any criminal can just make a kit to do X and sell it to actual car thieves claiming he thought they were [legal profession like car repo].

Sort of like how people sell malware/"security tools" now. "Oh, I sold it to a criminal. HOW COULD I HAVE KNOWN?" :p
Haha, and that's if you have Windows 7 install media. A previous machine of mine was upgraded from Vista to 7. There's no way to reïnstall 7 on it without reïnstalling Vista first. 10 would be a nightmare.
To be fair, they mention(with no sources) physiological benefits to standing up.
For what it's worth, I have noticed that actual stand ups are shorter. When people settle in and sit they tend to start rambling. It is hard to convince people to actually stand though without being dictatorial. Here's a study of undergrads (so take it with a grain of salt) that shows that they are in fact shorter:

http://nymag.com/scienceofus/2014/05/work-smarter-for-shorte...
Continuations work the same way without a stack, incidentally. You are still saving the FP, either way. I'm not aware of languages that don't have a FP of some kind.

Interesting on the last point, that you'd find coroutines harder to explain with 'save the current place you're executing, go do something else, return to that place when you need to do more'.