I'm sorry, but this sort of thing can only come from people who are religious about their computer rather than practical.

A $250 HP laptop like the one's I just bought my kids is just as capable and useful than a $2,000 Macbook Pro.

Let's see, can it be used to log onto something like SalesForce by sales people, assistants, managers and other workers to manage customer leads and the sales process.

YUP.

Can it be used by various people to do email, browse the web, produce Word and Excel documents, make Skype calls and run other business applications.

YUP.

Can you use it to make presentations?

YUP.

Large display?

YUP.

Edit videos?

YUP.

Edit sound?

YUP?

Run Photoshop, Illustrator?

YUP.

Can it be used by software developers to maintain the company's website/s.

YUP.

Can it be used by graphic artists to work on brochures, images, pamphlets and other printed and web-based sales materials?

YUP.

Can it be used by engineers to run SolidWorks, AutoCAD or an EDA tool like Altium Designer.

YUP.

Embedded development, Keil?

YUP.

Run Eclipse?

YUP.

NetBeans?

YUP.

PyCharm, etc.?

YUP.

Can it be used to SSH into a server to run, well, whatever?

YUP.

Oh, let's see, can you run a virtual machine with Ubuntu Workstation?

YUP.

Can you run a VM with a Linux server?

YUP.

Multiple instances?

YES!

...and the above list is not complete.

Well, then. What, pray-tell, do you get for $2,000 that you cannot do with a $250 machine?

Please don't say quality. That's nonsense. Yes, Apple machines have great design and quality. That is true. However, the $250 machine isn't crap and easily outlives it's useful life (meaning, you'll replace it with a new model way before it fails) and it offers just as much utility and functionality as the $2,000 Mac. Yes, some are crap. The beauty of the PC ecosystem is that you get MULTIPLE choices at every price point from a multitude of manufacturers. We've had good luck with HP, Sony and Acer. YMMV. And, when we buy laptops, we test the hell out of one for 30 days and then buy a dozen of them if they do well. You can nearly buy a dozen great PC laptops for the price of a single Macbook Pro. You can outfit an entire small company for the same money as one computer. That's saying something.

And, frankly, the vast majority of the machines you see at the store from major brands are really nice machines. If you want to splurge and get a monster of a machine, spend $500.

BTW, we have both Macs and PC's. Most of our engineering machines (either type) cost $10K to $50K by the time you account for the software and hardware installed in them. The point is that we are not delusional about why we have the machines we have. They are tools for a job.

We would have no use whatsoever for Macs if it were not to work on iOS projects. Everything else, including web development can be done on any one of a horde of excellent PC's running Linux or Windows.

Even commodity computers today are grotesquely over-powered for the vast majority of applications normal and not-so-normal businesses typically run.

Look, wanting to buy a Ferrari is OK. Pretending it is a sensible solution when you commute on the 405 on a daily basis is delusional. Yet, if someone truly wants to drive a Ferrari and they can swing it, it's OK so long as they don't start to believe that this is a reasonable decision for everyone else out there.

Please, answer my question:

What do you get from a $2,000 machine (beyond above listed utility) that you can't get with a $250 machine?

It's a very simple question.