Taxpayer Alert TA 2004/4: New Zealand Foreign Trust
Date of issue: 10 February 2004
Status: Current


Description: This Alert contains references to Schedule 4 of the International Tax Agreements Act 1953, which is now found in the Convention Between Australia And New Zealand For The Avoidance Of Double Taxation With Respect To Taxes On Income And Fringe Benefits And The Prevention Of Fiscal Evasion [2010] ATS 10. | This Taxpayer Alert describes an arrangement where a New Zealand based foreign discretionary trust provides services, at a mark up, to an Australian resident business. A New Zealand foreign trust is one that is established by a settlor who is not a resident of New Zealand or Australia and whose beneficiaries are not resident of New Zealand. The promoter argues that tax is not payable in New Zealand on the service fees and that no income is attributable to the Australian beneficiaries. | This alert applies to arrangements having the following features: 1. A New Zealand foreign discretionary trust (the trust) is created by a New Zealand based promoter with a settlor which is a company that is not a resident of either New Zealand or Australia. The trust has a New Zealand corporate trustee controlled by the promoter. 2. The trust is represented in Australia by an Australian resident who is associated with the New Zealand promoter. The Australian representative has been given a power of attorney for the trust. 3. The trust and an Australian business enter into a service agreement where the trust provides staff and services such as administration, business equipment and the provision of a motor vehicle to that business. 4. The Australian business is located and operating in Australia. The owner of the Australian business is closely associated with the controller of the foreign settlor of the trust. 5. The Australian business claims a deduction for the cost of staff and services plus the mark up. 6. The fees paid by the Australian business are deposited into an Australian bank account controlled by the Australian representative of the trust. 7. The owner of the Australian business appears to have access to the funds in the Australian bank account. | 1. A New Zealand foreign discretionary trust (the trust) is created by a New Zealand based promoter with a settlor which is a company that is not a resident of either New Zealand or Australia. The trust has a New Zealand corporate trustee controlled by the promoter. 2. The trust is represented in Australia by an Australian resident who is associated with the New Zealand promoter. The Australian representative has been given a power of attorney for the trust. 3. The trust and an Australian business enter into a service agreement where the trust provides staff and services such as administration, business equipment and the provision of a motor vehicle to that business. 4. The Australian business is located and operating in Australia. The owner of the Australian business is closely associated with the controller of the foreign settlor of the trust. 5. The Australian business claims a deduction for the cost of staff and services plus the mark up. 6. The fees paid by the Australian business are deposited into an Australian bank account controlled by the Australian representative of the trust. 7. The owner of the Australian business appears to have access to the funds in the Australian bank account. | The ATO considers that the arrangement outlined above gives rise to taxation issues which include whether: a) The trust has a permanent establishment in Australia. b) The transferor trust provisions in Division 6AAA of Part III of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (ITAA) apply. c) The transfer pricing provisions in Division 13 of Part III of the ITAA have application. d) The trust is a resident of New Zealand for the purposes of the Australia/New Zealand Double Tax Agreement. e) The general anti-avoidance provisions in Part IVA of the ITAA have application as: i. the arrangement seems artificial and lacks an ordinary business purpose in its design and execution; and ii. it appears that the dominant purpose of entering into the arrangement is to obtain a tax benefit. f) The arrangement is a sham. | a) The trust has a permanent establishment in Australia. b) The transferor trust provisions in Division 6AAA of Part III of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (ITAA) apply. c) The transfer pricing provisions in Division 13 of Part III of the ITAA have application. d) The trust is a resident of New Zealand for the purposes of the Australia/New Zealand Double Tax Agreement. e) The general anti-avoidance provisions in Part IVA of the ITAA have application as: i. the arrangement seems artificial and lacks an ordinary business purpose in its design and execution; and ii. it appears that the dominant purpose of entering into the arrangement is to obtain a tax benefit. f) The arrangement is a sham. | i. the arrangement seems artificial and lacks an ordinary business purpose in its design and execution; and ii. it appears that the dominant purpose of entering into the arrangement is to obtain a tax benefit. | The Australian Taxation Office is examining these arrangements.





Related documents: TR | 2005/14. | PS 2008/15 | Australia/New Zealand Double Tax Agreement | ITAA 1936 subsection 6(1) | ITAA 1936 Part IVA | ITAA 1936 Division 6AAA | ITAA 1936 Division 6 | ITAA 1997 Section 8-1 | International Tax Agreements Act 1953 Schedule 4 (Repealed)

Large Business & International | International Strategy and Operations