Class Ruling CR 2014/93
Date of effect: 30 June 2020

What this ruling is about: 1. This Ruling sets out the Commissioner's opinion on the way in which the relevant provision(s) identified below apply to the defined class of entities, who take part in the scheme to which this Ruling relates. Relevant provision(s) 2. The relevant provisions dealt with in this Ruling are: All subsequent legislative references are to the ITAA 1997 unless otherwise indicated. Class of entities 3. The class of entities to which this Ruling applies comprises 'R&D entities', as defined by section 355-35 who are liable for levy contributions under the Australian Coal Association Research Program (ACARP) to Australian Coal Research Ltd (ACR), and who: 4. In this Ruling the term 'Contributor' is used to refer to those companies that are ultimately obliged to pay levy contributions to ACR under the ACARP. In the Deed of Agreement discussed below, those companies are either the 'mine owner(s)' or 'operator(s) of coal producing assets' or 'contributor(s)' where no separate 'mine owner(s)' are identified in the Deed of Agreement. 5. This Ruling does not apply to R&D entities that are not registered for the relevant years of income with Innovation Australia. The publication of this Ruling does not relieve companies making contributions to the ACARP of the obligation to make separate applications for registration of their activities under section 27A of the Industry Research and Development Act 1986 (IR&D Act 1986). Qualifications 6. The Commissioner makes this Ruling based on the precise scheme identified in this Ruling. 7. The class of entities defined in this Ruling may rely on its contents provided the scheme actually carried out is carried out in accordance with the scheme described in paragraphs 17 to 52 of this Ruling. 8. The description of the scheme in this Ruling is a generic one, capable of applying to a number of specific projects funded, or to be funded, through the ACARP. However, the Commissioner does not provide any guarantee that any actual project does fall within this description. Contributors will need to confer with ACR to obtain this assurance. 9. If the scheme actually carried out is materially different from the scheme that is described in this Ruling, then:

Class of entities or scheme: 3. The class of entities to which this Ruling applies comprises 'R&D entities', as defined by section 355-35 who are liable for levy contributions under the Australian Coal Association Research Program (ACARP) to Australian Coal Research Ltd (ACR), and who: 4. In this Ruling the term 'Contributor' is used to refer to those companies that are ultimately obliged to pay levy contributions to ACR under the ACARP. In the Deed of Agreement discussed below, those companies are either the 'mine owner(s)' or 'operator(s) of coal producing assets' or 'contributor(s)' where no separate 'mine owner(s)' are identified in the Deed of Agreement. 5. This Ruling does not apply to R&D entities that are not registered for the relevant years of income with Innovation Australia. The publication of this Ruling does not relieve companies making contributions to the ACARP of the obligation to make separate applications for registration of their activities under section 27A of the Industry Research and Development Act 1986 (IR&D Act 1986). | Qualifications: 6. The Commissioner makes this Ruling based on the precise scheme identified in this Ruling. 7. The class of entities defined in this Ruling may rely on its contents provided the scheme actually carried out is carried out in accordance with the scheme described in paragraphs 17 to 52 of this Ruling. 8. The description of the scheme in this Ruling is a generic one, capable of applying to a number of specific projects funded, or to be funded, through the ACARP. However, the Commissioner does not provide any guarantee that any actual project does fall within this description. Contributors will need to confer with ACR to obtain this assurance. 9. If the scheme actually carried out is materially different from the scheme that is described in this Ruling, then: 10. This Ruling applies from 1July 2015 to 30 June 2020. The Ruling continues to apply after 30 June 2020 to all entities within the specified class who entered into the specified scheme during the term of the Ruling. However, this Ruling will not apply to taxpayers to the extent that it conflicts with the terms of a settlement of a dispute agreed to before the date of issue of this Ruling (see paragraphs 75 and 76 of Taxation Ruling TR 2006/10). 11. Class Ruling CR 2005/9 was issued on 9 March 2005, regarding membership funding for the ACARP. Class Ruling CR 2005/9 applied to the income years ended 30 June 2006 to 30 June 2010. 12. Class Ruling CR 2009/45 was issued on 26 August 2009 and applied to income years ending 30 June 2011 to 30 June 2015. The Class Ruling concerned membership contributions made to ACARP in relation to the income tax laws enacted at the date of issue. 13. Following the issuing of the Class Ruling there was a significant legislative change in the Tax Laws Amendment (Research and Development) Act 2011 (the Amendment Act) which received Royal Assent on 8 September 2011. 14. The Amendment Act inserted a new Division 355 into the ITAA 1997 and repealed sections 73B to 73Z of the ITAA 1936. 15. Due to the legislative change, Class Ruling CR 2009/45 ceased to have effect from and including the income year ending 30 June 2012. 16. Class Ruling 2012/82 was issued on 26 September 2012, regarding membership funding for the ACARP. CR 2012/82 applied to the income years ended 30 June 2012 to 30 June 2015. 17. The following description of the scheme is based on information provided by the applicant. The following documents, or relevant parts of them form part of and are to be read with the description: Note: certain information has been provided on a commercial-in-confidence basis and will not be disclosed or released under Freedom of Information legislation. | Memorandum of Understanding: 18. The ACARP was formed in accordance with a Memorandum of Understanding (the original MOU) between the Australian Coal Association (ACA) and the Commonwealth Government. 19. The original MOU between the chairman of ACA and the then Minister for Primary Industries and Energy was first signed on 22 January 1992. The arrangement set out in the MOU has been extended on five occasions beyond its original expiration date of 30 June 1996. The current extension will conclude on 30 June 2015. [1] 20. The ACA's responsibility for the ACARP were transferred to the Minerals Council of Australia (MCA) as a result of a decision to wind-up the ACA and integrate its functions with the MCA. In 2014 the MCA and the Commonwealth Government entered into a new Memorandum of Understanding (MOU). 21. The new MOU commenced on 8 April 2014 and continues until 30 June 2015, with an optional extension to 30 June 2020 and further extensions from 30 June 2020 at five year intervals. The extensions are subject to the MCA confirming in writing to the Department of Industry that all Australian black coal producers are committed to continuing to pay a voluntary levy, capped at 5 cents per tonne of saleable black coal produced. [2] 22. By letter dated 24 February 2014, the Minister for Industry agreed to extend the MOU until 30 June 2020 subject to the MCA confirming by 31 March 2015 that all Australian black coal producers agree to pay the voluntary levy, continuing to 30 June 2020. 23. The purpose of the MOU is to provide for the continuation of the Australian coal industry research arrangement, ACARP, which replaced the operations of the Coal Research Trust Account. The arrangement is designed to provide for collective and integrated research on coal for the purpose of: 24. The MOU explains that in the pursuit of these objectives the MCA undertakes to allocate research funds so raised, including interest earned, exclusively for the administration and execution of coal R&D activities. | Australian Coal Research Limited: 25. ACA established a legal entity, Australian Coal Research Limited (ACR) to carry out all ACARP Management (including financial and statutory responsibilities) on its behalf. ACR will continue to carry out these responsibilities on the MCA's behalf pursuant to the terms of the MOU and the Performance Deed between MCA and ACR, dated 20 March 2014. 26. ACR's Constitution [3] describes its objects, many of which mirror those in the MOU. 27. The Board of ACR comprises senior industry personnel nominated by Contributors. In addition, ACR also has an executive director. The board of ACR has the ultimate authority for approval of all project commitments. 28. There is a Research Committee with overview of technical direction and five Technical Committees with specific technical focus that undertake detailed considerations of the program, including research objective priorities, project selection and ongoing monitoring. All committees are comprised of industry personnel nominated by the Contributors. 29. ACR is an income tax exempt entity. 30. ACR is currently registered as a research service provider (levy collecting) under section 29A of the IR&D Act 1986 in relation to the research field categories of R&D activities that are carried out, and will have its registration extended for the years relevant to this Ruling. 31. ACR is not an 'associate' of any Contributors as defined in section 318 of the ITAA 1936. | Deed of Agreement between ACR and each operator of coal producing assets (Deed of Agreement): 32. Each affected coal producer (referred to in the Deed of Agreement as an 'operator of coal producing assets') enters into a Deed of Agreement with ACR under which they are liable to make Contributions (contributions or levies). Agency clauses are present in the agreement, which indicate that in some circumstances the operator of coal producing assets is entering into the Deed of Agreement on behalf of each of the mine owners. 33. Contributions are calculated at the rate of $0.05 per tonne of coal produced by the operator during the term of the agreement, on a monthly basis. All Contributions paid to ACR become property of ACR. 34. The Deed of Agreement defines 'research and development' as follows: 35. In the Deed of Agreement, ACR promises that contributions will be applied exclusively in respect of 'research and development'. It is noted that the definition of 'research and development' in the Deed of Agreement between ACR and the operator of coal producing assets is different to the definition of 'R&D activities' in section 355-20. However, the applicant advises that levies are directed only to those activities meeting the requirements of the definition of 'research and development' under the Deed. Activities outside of this definition are supported by non-levy funds. 36. ACR also promises 'that the results of the Research and Development will be made available for the benefit of the Operator to the extent possible under the terms of the Agreements' entered into by ACR in relation to the ACARP program. 37. Each party has the right to terminate the Deed of Agreement if, amongst other things, the other party commits a breach of their obligations under the deed and the breach cannot be or is not rectified. 38. The Deed of Agreement and the manner in which the program is executed provide rights to coal producers in relation to the R&D to be undertaken, such that control of the R&D resides with the Contributors. According to the Deed of Agreement, Contributors also have the right to access final research reports upon request. 39. All black coal producers in Australia are expected to enter into the Deed of Agreement and thus become liable to make contributions to ACR for the period 1 July 2015 to 30 June 2020. | ACARP's funding and operations: 40. Levies paid to ACR by Contributors that are directed towards R&D activities, as defined in the Deed of Agreement, constitute 'expenditure incurred' for the purposes of section 355-205. 41. The R&D activities which ACR arranges to be conducted for the Contributors are, and will be, consistent with its Constitution and the Memorandum of Agreement. Specific R&D activities will vary from project to project. Whether or not these specific activities are covered by Division 355 and section 27 of the IR&D Act 1986, will depend on the terms of sections 355-20, 355-25 and 355-30 (being the definitions respectively, of R&D activities, core R&D activities and supporting R&D activities) being met. (see further paragraph 55 of this Ruling). 42. All levy contributions are accepted as being used for R&D activities, as defined in the agreement. The levies fund projects carried out under 'Fundamental', 'Applied' and 'Commissioned Study' R&D agreements to which ACR is a party. Other activities are funded by interest earned on funds held for future commitments and royalties. 43. It is uncommon that any projects are completely funded under the ACARP. These projects are carried out on a collaborative basis with cash and in kind contributions made by other parties (including researchers). 44. Benefits received by Contributors and parties to these agreements from R&D projects including their interest in the results of the projects concerned, are commensurate with the contributions made. 45. Previous research has shown that the ACARP delivers significant net benefits to the coal industry. While ACR has obtained some commercialisation proceeds, this has been negligible, and is not expected to become a major benefit. 46. ACARP provides outcomes with general solutions to all aspects of concern to the Australian black coal industry as specified in the MOU, being the agreed purpose of the research program. It is a condition of the ACARP funding that the outcomes of every project must be available for use by Contributors. Contributors will individually decide whether they implement the outcomes of each project based on a wide range of commercial and other factors, given that not all projects funded by the ACARP have the same degree of immediate relevance to every Contributor and each mine is unique in itself. | Research and Development Agreements - Fundamental, Applied and Commissioned Study: 47. ACR enters into agreements by which it engages researchers to carry out R&D activities, including 48. ACR also enters into other agreements (whether or not in collaboration or cooperation with others), which result in the undertaking of R&D. 49. ACR produces an ACARP Annual Report and a People and Projects Report which document the specific research projects funded by the ACARP levy during the year, the people involved in those projects and provide statistical and financial information. 50. Between 01 July 2010 and the end of June 2014, the ACARP commenced 216 projects under the above mentioned agreement types. Of these projects, 186 were undertaken under 'Fundamental' Research and Development Agreements, 18 under 'Applied' Research and Development Agreements, 5 under 'Commissioned Study' Research and Development Agreements and 7 were not agreed to under formal agreements, but rather an exchange of letters or some other approach. There is no evidence to suggest that these proportions will materially change in the future. 51. Common to all three formal agreements are the following conditions: 52. Typically these agreements are entered into for the purpose of generating knowledge benefits for Contributors, and this is the dominant benefit arising out of these agreements. | Subdivision 355-C - Entitlement to a tax offset: 53. For the years of income ending 30 June 2016 to 30 June 2020 inclusive (or equivalent substituted accounting periods), to the extent that a Contributor pays levies in an income year that: they will be entitled to a tax offset calculated in accordance with section 355-100. Further, subsection 355-210(2) will not preclude a notional deduction arising under section 355-205. [4] 54. A notional deduction is not allowable under section 355-205 to a Contributor: 55. The Commissioner acknowledges that any opinion formed about the R&D activities referred to in this Ruling can be overridden by Innovation Australia. [5] Therefore, the Commissioner does not express an opinion about these activities and whether they are R&D activities as defined in section 355-20. This Ruling is made on the presumption (unless told otherwise by Innovation Australia) that the activities are R&D activities as defined under section 355-20. | Section 82KZMD and section 355-205: 56. Where expenditure is notionally deductible under section 355-205, and the R&D activities to which the expenditure relates are not carried out in the current income year, section 82KZMD of the ITAA 1936 applies, such that the timing and amount of the deduction is allocated over the relevant eligible service period. Commissioner of Taxation 19 November 2014 | Meaning of R&D activities and other terms: 57. R&D activities are defined in section 355-20. This Ruling applies only to those Contributors who are correctly registered with Innovation Australia, so that the activities being undertaken by ACR are taken to be R&D activities undertaken by the Contributors. 58. A Contributor cannot rely on this Ruling if Innovation Australia determines that: | R&D Entities: 59. R&D entities are defined in section 355-35 as: 60. The class of persons to which this Ruling applies (Contributors) are R&D entities within the meaning of section 355-35. Therefore this requirement is satisfied for the class of persons to which this Ruling applies. | Entitlement to R&D tax offset: 61. For the purposes of this Ruling, when calculating a Contributor's entitlement to an R&D tax offset it is necessary to first ascertain that they have notional deductions (for the purposes of Subdivision 355-C) for the year of income. 62. Where an R&D entity is entitled to deduct an amount under: then that amount is used in calculating the R&D entity's entitlement to a tax offset, which is determined by reference to the tables contained in section 355-100. | When notional deductions for R&D expenditure arise: 63. Contributors pay contributions to ACR in accordance with the Deed of Agreement. Therefore, they incur expenditure when these payments are made. To the extent that the payments are 'incurred on one or more R&D activities', they will be expenditure within the meaning of section 355-205 and as such they will constitute a notional deduction to the R&D entity (Contributor) subject to the application of the prepayment rules (discussed below). 64. A tax offset will be available in a year of income under Subdivision 355-C to the extent that an R&D entity: | Whether the contributions are incurred 'on one or more *R&D activities': 65. Paragraph 355-205(1)(a) says that in order to deduct expenditure for an income year the expenditure needs to have been 'incurred on one or more *R&D activities'. The nature of the connection between the expenditure and the R&D activities expressed by the word 'on' in this context is governed by its place in the overall scheme of Division 355. 66. In Division 355, section 355-5 provides that the object of the Division concerns encouraging the conduct of particular R&D activities. Paragraph 355-205(1)(b) envisages that an R&D entity might incur expenditure within paragraph 355-205(1)(a), that is, incurring that expenditure 'on' an R&D activity, by incurring an amount to an 'associate' of theirs. That associate might be the entity which conducts the R&D activity, or it might, in turn, pay its employees, or an agent, or an independent contractor, to conduct this activity. The requirement that the expenditure be linked to the conduct of particular R&D activities is also found in subsection 355-210(1), concerning whether the expenditure coming within paragraph 355-205(1)(a) has also been incurred on activities which have been 'conducted for' the R&D entity (see, paragraph 355-210(1)(a)). 67. Also in Division 355, section 355-110 provides for the spreading of an R&D entity's deductions under section 355-205 or section 355-480, where the prepaid expenditure rules in Subdivision H of Division 3 of Part III of the ITAA 1936 apply. Section 355-110 thus contemplates that there may be expenditure which comes within paragraph 355-205(1)(a), where there is a lapse in time between when that expenditure is incurred on particular R&D activities, and when those activities begin to be conducted. 68. The fact that the expenditure in question might be incurred to an intermediary, or that there might be a gap in time between the expenditure being incurred and when the R&D activities begin, therefore will not in themselves, mean that the expenditure fails the requirement of needing to have been 'incurred on one or more R&D activities'. On the other hand, having regard to the object of Division 355, expenditure that is 'on' an activity which is not an R&D activity, where that expenditure is not integral to the conduct of any R&D activity, cannot be said to be sufficiently connected to the conduct of any R&D activity in a way which would bring it within paragraph 355-205(1)(a). 69. Factors to consider in determining whether this sufficient connection exists include: 70. The information provided by the applicant demonstrates that the amounts identified as relating to R&D activities for the purposes of section 355-20, are appropriately recognised in the reports prepared by ACARP for its Contributors. This enables a Contributor to correctly ascertain the amount of their levy contribution which has been expended on particular R&D activities identified as part of the relevant projects. Therefore, the first requirement is satisfied. | Registration under section 27A of the IR&D Act 1986: 71. In accordance with subparagraph 355-205(1)(a)(i), an R&D entity's entitlement to a notional deduction in an income year, will only arise if (amongst other requirements) it is registered (for the activities to which the expenditure relates) under section 27A of the IR&D Act 1986. 72. The class of entities to which this Ruling applies comprise companies registered in relation to specific R&D activities in accordance with the requirements of subparagraph 355-205(1)(a)(i). Therefore, this requirement is satisfied for the class of entities to which this Ruling applies. | Notional deductions of at least $20,000: 73. Ordinarily, to be eligible for an R&D tax offset, an R&D entity must have total notional deductions of at least $20,000 in the year of income. Where the expenditure is incurred to a registered research service provider, it is not subject to the $20,000 threshold requirement (subsection 355-100(2) Item 1). 74. As the class of entities to which this Ruling applies are R&D entities that have incurred expenditure to a registered research service provider, [6] the $20,000 notional deduction threshold requirement need not be met. | Preclusion by other provisions: 75. Subsection 355-205(2) provides that a notional deduction arising under subsection 355-205(1) will be subject to the effect of: | Excluded Expenditure: 76. Section 355-225 excludes certain types of expenditure from giving rise to a notional deduction under section 355-205, and subsequent inclusion in the calculation of any entitlement to a tax offset under section 355-100. The contributions to the ACARP do not result in Contributors having any of these excluded expenditure types in section 355-225, for the following reasons: | Integrity rules: 77. Subdivision 355-F sets out various rules which are intended to preserve the integrity and operation of the R&D tax incentive. Paragraph 3.155 of the Explanatory Memorandum to the Tax Laws Amendment (Research and Development) Bill 2010 (the EM) explains that Subdivision 355-F corresponds to the integrity provisions in former sections 73B and 73CA of the ITAA 1936. 78. This Ruling does not consider whether any of the integrity rules identified in Subdivision 355-F operate in such a way as to either prevent (or alter) a notional deduction that would otherwise arise under subsection 355-205(1). 79. A Contributor who wants to ensure that Subdivision 355-F does not apply to their circumstances should request a private ruling. | CRC contributions: 80. Given that contributions are not being paid to any entity that is part of the Commonwealth government's CRC program, Subdivision 355-K does not apply to this Ruling. | R&D partnerships: 81. Given that there is no partnership between Contributors, Subdivision 355-J does not apply to this Ruling. | Conditions for R&D activities: 82. A Contributor's entitlement to a notional deduction under subsection 355-205(1) is subject to section 355-210 being satisfied. Section 355-210 provides specific conditions that must be satisfied before an activity will be regarded as an R&D activity to which subsection 355-205 applies. For the purposes of this Ruling those conditions are: 83. Whether R&D activities are conducted 'for' a Contributor as required by paragraph 355-210(1)(a), and not 'to a significant extent' for any other persons besides the Contributors, as provided by subsection 355-210(2) is considered in the following paragraphs of this Ruling. Note that the activities in question are not carried out by any of the Contributors. | R&D activities conducted 'for' the R&D entity and not 'to a significant extent' for other entities: 84. Entitlement to a notional deduction under section 355-205 for the payment of levies to ACR will only arise if that expenditure is incurred on R&D activities, and those R&D activities are conducted 'for' the R&D entity. Further, the R&D activities which give rise to that notional deduction under section 355-205 must not be 'conducted, to a significant extent' for any other entity which does not satisfy the qualifying condition in paragraph 355-210(1)(a). [7] 85. In explaining when expenditure on R&D will give rise to a notional deduction, the EM explains (at paragraphs 3.52 - 3.55): 86. These three key criteria apply to two of the conditions in section 355-210. The first condition concerns whether, in a positive sense, the R&D activities in question have been conducted 'for' the R&D entity (paragraph 355-210(1)(a)). The second concerns whether, in a negative sense, those R&D activities have been conducted 'to a significant extent', 'for one or more other entities not covered by any paragraph of subsection (1)' (subsection 355-210(2)). Applying these key criteria to a particular case requires weighing them up against the relevant facts and circumstances of that case. | Effective ownership: 87. A company effectively owning results of the relevant R&D activities is the first identifying criterion in determining whether the R&D activities are being carried out for that company. However, it is recognised that this does not necessarily require that the company must be the proprietor of a piece of intellectual property (IP), as formal regimes of IP may not be available to protect the results. Further, it is possible that the formal owner of the IP may hold it on such terms that the company has all advantages of ownership. 88. If a number of companies fund an R&D project together on their behalf, it is necessary that each must have a proper and effective interest in the R&D results. 89. ACR uses levies paid by Contributors to fund the R&D activities of the projects which are undertaken in accordance with the relevant R&D agreements. Any IP generated as a result of the relevant R&D activities will not be legally owned by the Contributors. In addition to having an interest in the relevant R&D activities, Contributors must have effective ownership of the overall results of the relevant project, such that they have an interest in the overall results of the relevant project which is commensurate with their contributions. 90. The Deed of Agreement between ACR and the operator of coal producing assets (on behalf of the mine owner) warrants 'that the results of the Research and Development will be made available for the benefit of the Operator to the extent possible under the terms of the Agreements'. 91. In order to determine whether Contributors' interests in the results of the R&D activities funded by their levies are commensurate with their contributions, it is necessary to consider the benefits that flow from the expenditure to the Contributors. 92. An examination of the benefits that Contributors are expected to gain and their individual interests in the results of the R&D activities conducted in connection with the arrangement to which this Ruling applies, in comparison to their relevant expenditure, leads to the conclusion that the expenditure is commensurate with the benefits to be gained. 93. The fact that ACR may receive minimal commercialisation proceeds does not alter this conclusion. | Control: 94. The second identifying criterion is the nature and extent of control that the Contributors have over the R&D activities. It is considered that the Contributors, as a group, sufficiently control the R&D activities that they have contracted ACR to provide. The Contribution Deed has set the parameters for the R&D to be undertaken and the underlying philosophies which ACR is bound to follow. The Contributors have effective legal control, as they have the ability to compel ACR to perform in accordance with the Deed of Agreement. The manner in which the program is executed also supports the conclusion that the Contributors have sufficient control over the R&D activities. | Financial Risk: 95. The final identifying criterion is the degree of financial risk that Contributors are assuming when the R&D activities are undertaken. In accordance with the Deed of Agreement, Contributors pay contributions which are calculated at a rate of up to $0.05 per tonne of coal produced (sold) over the term of the agreement. Payments are required on a monthly basis. The Deed of Agreement makes it clear that these contributions become the property of ACR. These contributions cannot be refunded to Contributors. 96. As Contributors pay non-refundable levies, they bear the financial risk associated with the R&D activities undertaken. | Summary: 97. The terms of the Deed of Agreement show that contributions to ACR will be applied exclusively in respect of R&D. The funding and project agreements specify that contributions can only be used for the purposes of the relevant project. 98. Contributors benefit from the results of the R&D activities, including receiving access to final reports. Contributors also have rights to use the results of the R&D activities associated with each project directly in connection with a business that they carry on. Thus there is a practical link between the expenditure and the activities, and the results to be produced from the activities. 99. This illustrates that there is a sufficiently close connection between the contributions used to fund the carrying on of R&D activities for the ACARP, such that this expenditure qualifies as being 'for' the activities identified as R&D activities. As discussed in paragraph 68 of this Ruling, the fact that payments are made to an intermediary does not preclude those payments from being on particular R&D activities. 100. An examination of the benefits that the Contributors are expected to gain and their individual interests in the results of the R&D activities conducted in connection with the scheme to which this Ruling applies, in comparison to their relevant expenditure, leads to the conclusion that the expenditure is commensurate with the benefits to be gained. 101. Contributions incurred by Contributors to ACR, constitute expenditure on conducting R&D activities 'for' them, under section 355-205. Subsection 355-210(2) will not preclude any entitlement to a notional deduction on the basis that the R&D activity is being conducted to a significant extent for another entity, which itself does not satisfy section 355-210. | Prepayment: 102. The timing of any entitlement to a tax offset available under section 355-100 can be affected by the prepayment rules. Section 82KZMA of the ITAA 1936 sets the amount and timing of deductions for expenditure that a taxpayer incurs in a year of income (the expenditure year), if: 103. As discussed above, the requirements of section 355-205 (R&D expenditure) will be met for expenditure incurred on R&D activities incurred by Contributors to ACR under the Deed of Agreement. The requirements of subsections 82KZMA(2) to (5) of the ITAA 1936 must also be met. | Whether subsections 82KZMA(2) to (5) are satisfied: 104. Subsections 82KZMA(2) to (5) of the ITAA 1936 are satisfied for the reasons outlined below: 105. Under paragraph 82KZMA(3)(c), the expenditure must also be in return for the doing of a thing under the agreement that is not to be wholly done within the expenditure year. The expenditure in question is, and will continue to be, incurred on an ongoing basis over the course of several years. The application of the expenditure and the means by which it delivers benefits to the Contributors depends on the interaction between several agreements, none of which precisely prescribe when various activities are to start being done, and when they are to stop being done. 106. The substance of these agreements however, is that the expenditure will typically relate to activities to be carried out at some future time, on the basis that ACR requires funds in advance in order to see that the activities which are the subject of the relevant project are begun. 107. Therefore, in respect of expenditure incurred over any one year, it will generally not be possible to conclude that it has all been incurred in return for doing things (the R&D activities) that are all to be completed by the end of that year. Consistent with the proposition that contributions will be applied progressively over the life of the ACARP to carry out budgeted activities on behalf of the Contributors, is the notion that each contribution is intended to fund only so much of these activities at any one time. 108. Accordingly, the condition in paragraph 82KZMA(3)(c) will also be satisfied. Identification of when the various activities are to start and stop is best done by reference to the underlying planning and budgetary documentation that guides the relevant project and ACR's actions. Determination of these stop and start times will necessarily, in the circumstances, be one of reasonable estimation, rather than something that occurs with absolute precision. | Amount and timing of deduction: 109. Subsection 82KZMD(2) of the ITAA 1936, provides that for each year of income containing all or part of the eligible service period for the expenditure, the taxpayer may deduct the amount under section 8-1, or notionally deduct the amount under section 355-205 by applying this formula: Expenditure * [Number of days in the eligible service period for the year of income / Total number of days of eligible service period] 110. Under subsection 82KZL(1), the 111. Relevant to the task of determining the eligible service period are the Deed of Agreement, the funding and project agreements, and any other relevant agreements entered into for the purposes of the relevant projects. In addition, quarterly reports, annual reports and annual budgets provided to ACR for the purposes of the relevant project will also be of assistance. 112. There is an inherent or expected degree of imprecision when applying the calculation required under section 82KZMD. As discussed in paragraph 108 of this Ruling, with reference to the ACR's underlying planning and budgetary documentation which guide its actions, it should be possible to calculate the amount identified in section 82KZMD with reasonable estimation. 113. Analysis of the relevant project's spending to date, in conjunction with the budget details for the planned spending, should provide a suitable indicator as to how much of the contributions paid to date have actually been applied to the activities of the ACARP project, and what the typical 'lag' is in this respect, so as to produce a broad, but still reasonable reflection of the extent to which each quarter's sum of contributions relates to activities to be performed in the future. 114. Note that in circumstances in which the last day of the eligible service period would exceed 10 years after the eligible period's start date, the eligible service period is limited to a period of 10 years (refer to the definition of 'eligible service period' in subsection 83KZL(1) of the ITAA 1936). 115. The following is a detailed contents list for this Ruling: © AUSTRALIAN TAXATION OFFICE FOR THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute this material as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products). Subsection 82KZL(3) states that the Subdivision has effect as if conducting R&D activities were carrying on a business. Further, taxpayers to whom paragraph 82KZMA(2)(b) (concerning small business entities) apply are outside the class of entities covered by this Ruling. an amount of expenditure: Not previously issued as a draft

Ruling: Subdivision 355-C - Entitlement to a tax offset: 53. For the years of income ending 30 June 2016 to 30 June 2020 inclusive (or equivalent substituted accounting periods), to the extent that a Contributor pays levies in an income year that: they will be entitled to a tax offset calculated in accordance with section 355-100. Further, subsection 355-210(2) will not preclude a notional deduction arising under section 355-205. [4] 54. A notional deduction is not allowable under section 355-205 to a Contributor: 55. The Commissioner acknowledges that any opinion formed about the R&D activities referred to in this Ruling can be overridden by Innovation Australia. [5] Therefore, the Commissioner does not express an opinion about these activities and whether they are R&D activities as defined in section 355-20. This Ruling is made on the presumption (unless told otherwise by Innovation Australia) that the activities are R&D activities as defined under section 355-20. | Section 82KZMD and section 355-205: 56. Where expenditure is notionally deductible under section 355-205, and the R&D activities to which the expenditure relates are not carried out in the current income year, section 82KZMD of the ITAA 1936 applies, such that the timing and amount of the deduction is allocated over the relevant eligible service period. Commissioner of Taxation 19 November 2014


Appendix: Meaning of R&D activities and other terms: 57. R&D activities are defined in section 355-20. This Ruling applies only to those Contributors who are correctly registered with Innovation Australia, so that the activities being undertaken by ACR are taken to be R&D activities undertaken by the Contributors. 58. A Contributor cannot rely on this Ruling if Innovation Australia determines that: | R&D Entities: 59. R&D entities are defined in section 355-35 as: 60. The class of persons to which this Ruling applies (Contributors) are R&D entities within the meaning of section 355-35. Therefore this requirement is satisfied for the class of persons to which this Ruling applies. | Entitlement to R&D tax offset: 61. For the purposes of this Ruling, when calculating a Contributor's entitlement to an R&D tax offset it is necessary to first ascertain that they have notional deductions (for the purposes of Subdivision 355-C) for the year of income. 62. Where an R&D entity is entitled to deduct an amount under: then that amount is used in calculating the R&D entity's entitlement to a tax offset, which is determined by reference to the tables contained in section 355-100. | When notional deductions for R&D expenditure arise: 63. Contributors pay contributions to ACR in accordance with the Deed of Agreement. Therefore, they incur expenditure when these payments are made. To the extent that the payments are 'incurred on one or more R&D activities', they will be expenditure within the meaning of section 355-205 and as such they will constitute a notional deduction to the R&D entity (Contributor) subject to the application of the prepayment rules (discussed below). 64. A tax offset will be available in a year of income under Subdivision 355-C to the extent that an R&D entity: | Whether the contributions are incurred 'on one or more *R&D activities': 65. Paragraph 355-205(1)(a) says that in order to deduct expenditure for an income year the expenditure needs to have been 'incurred on one or more *R&D activities'. The nature of the connection between the expenditure and the R&D activities expressed by the word 'on' in this context is governed by its place in the overall scheme of Division 355. 66. In Division 355, section 355-5 provides that the object of the Division concerns encouraging the conduct of particular R&D activities. Paragraph 355-205(1)(b) envisages that an R&D entity might incur expenditure within paragraph 355-205(1)(a), that is, incurring that expenditure 'on' an R&D activity, by incurring an amount to an 'associate' of theirs. That associate might be the entity which conducts the R&D activity, or it might, in turn, pay its employees, or an agent, or an independent contractor, to conduct this activity. The requirement that the expenditure be linked to the conduct of particular R&D activities is also found in subsection 355-210(1), concerning whether the expenditure coming within paragraph 355-205(1)(a) has also been incurred on activities which have been 'conducted for' the R&D entity (see, paragraph 355-210(1)(a)). 67. Also in Division 355, section 355-110 provides for the spreading of an R&D entity's deductions under section 355-205 or section 355-480, where the prepaid expenditure rules in Subdivision H of Division 3 of Part III of the ITAA 1936 apply. Section 355-110 thus contemplates that there may be expenditure which comes within paragraph 355-205(1)(a), where there is a lapse in time between when that expenditure is incurred on particular R&D activities, and when those activities begin to be conducted. 68. The fact that the expenditure in question might be incurred to an intermediary, or that there might be a gap in time between the expenditure being incurred and when the R&D activities begin, therefore will not in themselves, mean that the expenditure fails the requirement of needing to have been 'incurred on one or more R&D activities'. On the other hand, having regard to the object of Division 355, expenditure that is 'on' an activity which is not an R&D activity, where that expenditure is not integral to the conduct of any R&D activity, cannot be said to be sufficiently connected to the conduct of any R&D activity in a way which would bring it within paragraph 355-205(1)(a). 69. Factors to consider in determining whether this sufficient connection exists include: 70. The information provided by the applicant demonstrates that the amounts identified as relating to R&D activities for the purposes of section 355-20, are appropriately recognised in the reports prepared by ACARP for its Contributors. This enables a Contributor to correctly ascertain the amount of their levy contribution which has been expended on particular R&D activities identified as part of the relevant projects. Therefore, the first requirement is satisfied. | Registration under section 27A of the IR&D Act 1986: 71. In accordance with subparagraph 355-205(1)(a)(i), an R&D entity's entitlement to a notional deduction in an income year, will only arise if (amongst other requirements) it is registered (for the activities to which the expenditure relates) under section 27A of the IR&D Act 1986. 72. The class of entities to which this Ruling applies comprise companies registered in relation to specific R&D activities in accordance with the requirements of subparagraph 355-205(1)(a)(i). Therefore, this requirement is satisfied for the class of entities to which this Ruling applies. | Notional deductions of at least $20,000: 73. Ordinarily, to be eligible for an R&D tax offset, an R&D entity must have total notional deductions of at least $20,000 in the year of income. Where the expenditure is incurred to a registered research service provider, it is not subject to the $20,000 threshold requirement (subsection 355-100(2) Item 1). 74. As the class of entities to which this Ruling applies are R&D entities that have incurred expenditure to a registered research service provider, [6] the $20,000 notional deduction threshold requirement need not be met. | Preclusion by other provisions: 75. Subsection 355-205(2) provides that a notional deduction arising under subsection 355-205(1) will be subject to the effect of: | Excluded Expenditure: 76. Section 355-225 excludes certain types of expenditure from giving rise to a notional deduction under section 355-205, and subsequent inclusion in the calculation of any entitlement to a tax offset under section 355-100. The contributions to the ACARP do not result in Contributors having any of these excluded expenditure types in section 355-225, for the following reasons: | Integrity rules: 77. Subdivision 355-F sets out various rules which are intended to preserve the integrity and operation of the R&D tax incentive. Paragraph 3.155 of the Explanatory Memorandum to the Tax Laws Amendment (Research and Development) Bill 2010 (the EM) explains that Subdivision 355-F corresponds to the integrity provisions in former sections 73B and 73CA of the ITAA 1936. 78. This Ruling does not consider whether any of the integrity rules identified in Subdivision 355-F operate in such a way as to either prevent (or alter) a notional deduction that would otherwise arise under subsection 355-205(1). 79. A Contributor who wants to ensure that Subdivision 355-F does not apply to their circumstances should request a private ruling. | CRC contributions: 80. Given that contributions are not being paid to any entity that is part of the Commonwealth government's CRC program, Subdivision 355-K does not apply to this Ruling. | R&D partnerships: 81. Given that there is no partnership between Contributors, Subdivision 355-J does not apply to this Ruling. | Conditions for R&D activities: 82. A Contributor's entitlement to a notional deduction under subsection 355-205(1) is subject to section 355-210 being satisfied. Section 355-210 provides specific conditions that must be satisfied before an activity will be regarded as an R&D activity to which subsection 355-205 applies. For the purposes of this Ruling those conditions are: 83. Whether R&D activities are conducted 'for' a Contributor as required by paragraph 355-210(1)(a), and not 'to a significant extent' for any other persons besides the Contributors, as provided by subsection 355-210(2) is considered in the following paragraphs of this Ruling. Note that the activities in question are not carried out by any of the Contributors. | R&D activities conducted 'for' the R&D entity and not 'to a significant extent' for other entities: 84. Entitlement to a notional deduction under section 355-205 for the payment of levies to ACR will only arise if that expenditure is incurred on R&D activities, and those R&D activities are conducted 'for' the R&D entity. Further, the R&D activities which give rise to that notional deduction under section 355-205 must not be 'conducted, to a significant extent' for any other entity which does not satisfy the qualifying condition in paragraph 355-210(1)(a). [7] 85. In explaining when expenditure on R&D will give rise to a notional deduction, the EM explains (at paragraphs 3.52 - 3.55): 86. These three key criteria apply to two of the conditions in section 355-210. The first condition concerns whether, in a positive sense, the R&D activities in question have been conducted 'for' the R&D entity (paragraph 355-210(1)(a)). The second concerns whether, in a negative sense, those R&D activities have been conducted 'to a significant extent', 'for one or more other entities not covered by any paragraph of subsection (1)' (subsection 355-210(2)). Applying these key criteria to a particular case requires weighing them up against the relevant facts and circumstances of that case. | Effective ownership: 87. A company effectively owning results of the relevant R&D activities is the first identifying criterion in determining whether the R&D activities are being carried out for that company. However, it is recognised that this does not necessarily require that the company must be the proprietor of a piece of intellectual property (IP), as formal regimes of IP may not be available to protect the results. Further, it is possible that the formal owner of the IP may hold it on such terms that the company has all advantages of ownership. 88. If a number of companies fund an R&D project together on their behalf, it is necessary that each must have a proper and effective interest in the R&D results. 89. ACR uses levies paid by Contributors to fund the R&D activities of the projects which are undertaken in accordance with the relevant R&D agreements. Any IP generated as a result of the relevant R&D activities will not be legally owned by the Contributors. In addition to having an interest in the relevant R&D activities, Contributors must have effective ownership of the overall results of the relevant project, such that they have an interest in the overall results of the relevant project which is commensurate with their contributions. 90. The Deed of Agreement between ACR and the operator of coal producing assets (on behalf of the mine owner) warrants 'that the results of the Research and Development will be made available for the benefit of the Operator to the extent possible under the terms of the Agreements'. 91. In order to determine whether Contributors' interests in the results of the R&D activities funded by their levies are commensurate with their contributions, it is necessary to consider the benefits that flow from the expenditure to the Contributors. 92. An examination of the benefits that Contributors are expected to gain and their individual interests in the results of the R&D activities conducted in connection with the arrangement to which this Ruling applies, in comparison to their relevant expenditure, leads to the conclusion that the expenditure is commensurate with the benefits to be gained. 93. The fact that ACR may receive minimal commercialisation proceeds does not alter this conclusion. | Control: 94. The second identifying criterion is the nature and extent of control that the Contributors have over the R&D activities. It is considered that the Contributors, as a group, sufficiently control the R&D activities that they have contracted ACR to provide. The Contribution Deed has set the parameters for the R&D to be undertaken and the underlying philosophies which ACR is bound to follow. The Contributors have effective legal control, as they have the ability to compel ACR to perform in accordance with the Deed of Agreement. The manner in which the program is executed also supports the conclusion that the Contributors have sufficient control over the R&D activities. | Financial Risk: 95. The final identifying criterion is the degree of financial risk that Contributors are assuming when the R&D activities are undertaken. In accordance with the Deed of Agreement, Contributors pay contributions which are calculated at a rate of up to $0.05 per tonne of coal produced (sold) over the term of the agreement. Payments are required on a monthly basis. The Deed of Agreement makes it clear that these contributions become the property of ACR. These contributions cannot be refunded to Contributors. 96. As Contributors pay non-refundable levies, they bear the financial risk associated with the R&D activities undertaken. | Summary: 97. The terms of the Deed of Agreement show that contributions to ACR will be applied exclusively in respect of R&D. The funding and project agreements specify that contributions can only be used for the purposes of the relevant project. 98. Contributors benefit from the results of the R&D activities, including receiving access to final reports. Contributors also have rights to use the results of the R&D activities associated with each project directly in connection with a business that they carry on. Thus there is a practical link between the expenditure and the activities, and the results to be produced from the activities. 99. This illustrates that there is a sufficiently close connection between the contributions used to fund the carrying on of R&D activities for the ACARP, such that this expenditure qualifies as being 'for' the activities identified as R&D activities. As discussed in paragraph 68 of this Ruling, the fact that payments are made to an intermediary does not preclude those payments from being on particular R&D activities. 100. An examination of the benefits that the Contributors are expected to gain and their individual interests in the results of the R&D activities conducted in connection with the scheme to which this Ruling applies, in comparison to their relevant expenditure, leads to the conclusion that the expenditure is commensurate with the benefits to be gained. 101. Contributions incurred by Contributors to ACR, constitute expenditure on conducting R&D activities 'for' them, under section 355-205. Subsection 355-210(2) will not preclude any entitlement to a notional deduction on the basis that the R&D activity is being conducted to a significant extent for another entity, which itself does not satisfy section 355-210. | Prepayment: 102. The timing of any entitlement to a tax offset available under section 355-100 can be affected by the prepayment rules. Section 82KZMA of the ITAA 1936 sets the amount and timing of deductions for expenditure that a taxpayer incurs in a year of income (the expenditure year), if: 103. As discussed above, the requirements of section 355-205 (R&D expenditure) will be met for expenditure incurred on R&D activities incurred by Contributors to ACR under the Deed of Agreement. The requirements of subsections 82KZMA(2) to (5) of the ITAA 1936 must also be met. | Whether subsections 82KZMA(2) to (5) are satisfied: 104. Subsections 82KZMA(2) to (5) of the ITAA 1936 are satisfied for the reasons outlined below: 105. Under paragraph 82KZMA(3)(c), the expenditure must also be in return for the doing of a thing under the agreement that is not to be wholly done within the expenditure year. The expenditure in question is, and will continue to be, incurred on an ongoing basis over the course of several years. The application of the expenditure and the means by which it delivers benefits to the Contributors depends on the interaction between several agreements, none of which precisely prescribe when various activities are to start being done, and when they are to stop being done. 106. The substance of these agreements however, is that the expenditure will typically relate to activities to be carried out at some future time, on the basis that ACR requires funds in advance in order to see that the activities which are the subject of the relevant project are begun. 107. Therefore, in respect of expenditure incurred over any one year, it will generally not be possible to conclude that it has all been incurred in return for doing things (the R&D activities) that are all to be completed by the end of that year. Consistent with the proposition that contributions will be applied progressively over the life of the ACARP to carry out budgeted activities on behalf of the Contributors, is the notion that each contribution is intended to fund only so much of these activities at any one time. 108. Accordingly, the condition in paragraph 82KZMA(3)(c) will also be satisfied. Identification of when the various activities are to start and stop is best done by reference to the underlying planning and budgetary documentation that guides the relevant project and ACR's actions. Determination of these stop and start times will necessarily, in the circumstances, be one of reasonable estimation, rather than something that occurs with absolute precision. | Amount and timing of deduction: 109. Subsection 82KZMD(2) of the ITAA 1936, provides that for each year of income containing all or part of the eligible service period for the expenditure, the taxpayer may deduct the amount under section 8-1, or notionally deduct the amount under section 355-205 by applying this formula: Expenditure * [Number of days in the eligible service period for the year of income / Total number of days of eligible service period] 110. Under subsection 82KZL(1), the 111. Relevant to the task of determining the eligible service period are the Deed of Agreement, the funding and project agreements, and any other relevant agreements entered into for the purposes of the relevant projects. In addition, quarterly reports, annual reports and annual budgets provided to ACR for the purposes of the relevant project will also be of assistance. 112. There is an inherent or expected degree of imprecision when applying the calculation required under section 82KZMD. As discussed in paragraph 108 of this Ruling, with reference to the ACR's underlying planning and budgetary documentation which guide its actions, it should be possible to calculate the amount identified in section 82KZMD with reasonable estimation. 113. Analysis of the relevant project's spending to date, in conjunction with the budget details for the planned spending, should provide a suitable indicator as to how much of the contributions paid to date have actually been applied to the activities of the ACARP project, and what the typical 'lag' is in this respect, so as to produce a broad, but still reasonable reflection of the extent to which each quarter's sum of contributions relates to activities to be performed in the future. 114. Note that in circumstances in which the last day of the eligible service period would exceed 10 years after the eligible period's start date, the eligible service period is limited to a period of 10 years (refer to the definition of 'eligible service period' in subsection 83KZL(1) of the ITAA 1936).


What this Ruling is about | NOT LEGALLY BINDING SECTION: | A public ruling is an expression of the Commissioner's opinion about the way in which a relevant provision applies, or would apply, to entities generally or to a class of entities in relation to a particular scheme or a class of schemes. | If you rely on this ruling, the Commissioner must apply the law to you in the way set out in the ruling (unless the Commissioner is satisfied that the ruling is incorrect and disadvantages you, in which case the law may be applied to you in a way that is more favourable for you - provided the Commissioner is not prevented from doing so by a time limit imposed by the law). You will be protected from having to pay any underpaid tax, penalty or interest in respect of the matters covered by this ruling if it turns out that it does not correctly state how the relevant provision applies to you. | is an R&D entity to the extent that it carries on business through that permanent establishment. | (3) However, an *exempt entity cannot be an R&D entity. | Generally, an R&D entity is only entitled to a tax deduction in relation to R&D activities conducted for the entity (whether by the R&D entity for itself or by another entity for it). Also, an entity cannot deduct its expenditure on R&D activities if it conducts those activities to a significant extent for another entity. | This retains a key rule from the existing law commonly known as the 'on own behalf' rule. This rule is intended to limit eligibility for a notional R&D deduction to where an R&D entity is the major benefactor from the expenditure it incurs on the R&D activities. In certain situations, the rule also prevents duplication of claims by different R&D entities. | In short, the question of whether an R&D activity is conducted for an R&D entity is a question of fact, determined by whether the activity is conducted in substance to provide the majority of knowledge benefits resulting from the activity, such as access to intellectual property, to this entity. | Whether an R&D entity has effective ownership involves reviewing all the circumstances surrounding the conduct of the relevant activities and the ownership and control of, and/or ability to utilise, the intellectual property or similar results obtained from the expenditure on the R&D activities. | Appendix 2 - Detailed contents list


Related rulings: TR 2006/10 CR 2005/9 CR 2009/45 CR 2012/82
Legislative references: ITAA 1936 73B ITAA 1936 73CA ITAA 1936 82KZL ITAA 1936 82KZL(1) ITAA 1936 82KZMA ITAA 1936 82KZMA(2) ITAA 1936 82KZMA(3)(a) ITAA 1936 82KZMA(3)(b) ITAA 1936 82KZMA(3)(c) ITAA 1936 82KZMA(4) ITAA 1936 82KZMA(5) ITAA 1936 82KZMD ITAA 1936 318 ITAA 1997 Div 40 ITAA 1997 40-40 ITAA 1997 328-110 ITAA 1997 Div 355 ITAA 1997 355-5 ITAA 1997 355-20 ITAA 1997 355-25 ITAA 1997 355-30 ITAA 1997 355-35 ITAA 1997 Subdiv 355-C ITAA 1997 355-100 ITAA 1997 355-100(1)(a) ITAA 1997 355-100(1)(b) ITAA 1997 355-100(1)(c) ITAA 1997 355-100(1)(d) ITAA 1997 355-100(1)(e) ITAA 1997 355-100(1)(f) ITAA 1997 355-100(1)(g) ITAA 1997 355-100(2) ITAA 1997 355-110 ITAA 1997 Subdiv 355-D ITAA 1997 355-205 ITAA 1997 355-205(1) ITAA 1997 355-205(1)(a)(i) ITAA 1997 355-205(2) ITAA 1997 355-210 ITAA 1997 355-210(1) ITAA 1997 355-210(1)(a) ITAA 1997 355-210(2) ITAA 1997 355-225 ITAA 1997 355-305 ITAA 1997 355-315 ITAA 1997 Subdiv 355-F ITAA 1997 355-480 ITAA 1997 Subdiv 355-J ITAA 1997 355-520 ITAA 1997 355-525 ITAA 1997 Subdiv 355-K ITAA 1997 355-580 ITAA 1997 Subdiv 355-W TAA 1953 Industry Research and Development Act 1986 27A Industry Research and Development Act 1986 29A
Subject references: on own behalf research and development tax offsets
Other references: Explanatory Memorandum to the Tax Laws Amendment (Research and Development) Bill 2010