Taxation Determination TD 2004/58
Date of effect: 27 October 2004




Examples: Example 1: 3. On 1 July 2001, ACo is incorporated as a wholly owned subsidiary of HCo with an initial capitalisation of $100,000 (100 shares at $1,000 each). In its first year of operation, ACo makes a tax loss of $50,000. ACo makes an accounting loss of $35,000 (after creation of a deferred tax asset (DTA) of $15,000 in respect of the tax loss). In the second year of operation ACo has an accounting profit of $35,000 (after reversing for the DTA). The assessable income of $50,000 recouped the tax loss carried forward from the first year. The taxable income (loss) is therefore $nil. ACo paid the profits as an unfranked interim dividend on 30 June 2003. On 1 July 2003 HCo and ACo consolidate. At the joining time ACo's market value was $65,000. 4. ACo's financial position at 1 July 2003 is shown in Table 1. 5. The ACA would be as follows: 6. In the above table, the Step 4 amount is $35,000. All of the profits were untaxed as they recouped the prior year tax loss. By subtracting the distribution of profits that accrued to the joined group of $35,000 at step 4, the ACA does not effectively reinstate the tax loss. 7. The ACA of $65,000 will be allocated to the retained cost base asset (that is, cash). There is no shortfall or excess of ACA. | Example 2: 8. Assume the same facts as above, but in this example the retained earnings balance is $nil because there was no distribution by ACo of current year profits. 9. ACo's financial position at 1 July 2003 is shown in Table 3. 10. The ACA would be as follows: 11. The ACA of $100,000 will be allocated to the retained cost base asset (that is, cash). There is no shortfall or excess of ACA. Date of effect 12. This Determination applies to years commencing both before and after its date of issue. However, it does not apply to taxpayers to the extent that it conflicts with the terms of settlement of a dispute agreed to before the date of the Determination (see paragraphs 21 and 22 of Taxation Ruling TR 92/20). Commissioner of Taxation 27 October 2004 Previously issued as Draft TD 2004/D35



The number, subject heading, date of effect and paragraph 1 to paragraph 2 of this document are a 'public ruling' for the purposes of Part IVAAA of the Taxation Administration Act 1953 and are legally binding on the Commissioner. | 1. Yes. Where a joining entity makes a distribution prior to the joining time out of profits that accrued to the joined group, and those profits recouped losses for income tax purposes that accrued to the joined group, the distribution is subtracted at step 4 of the allocable cost amount (ACA) under subparagraph 705-95(b)(ii) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997). This is not changed if the group is a transitional consolidated group. | 2. The purpose of step 4 is to prevent the ACA reflecting a return of part of the amount paid to acquire the membership interests in the joining entity (step 4 column 2 in the table in section 705-60). In particular, subparagraph 705-95(b)(ii) prevents the ACA reflecting an amount paid for membership interests in the joining entity that was later (but before it became a member of the joined group) lost and, following the recoupment of the loss, the profit that recouped the loss was distributed. | Add cost of membership interests | Add undistributed profits | Less Pre-joining time distributions out of certain profits | • subparagraph 705-95(b)(i) distributions of acquired profits: 0; and | • subparagraph 705-95(b)(ii) distributions of profits accrued to the joined group that recouped losses accrued to the group: 35,000


Related rulings: TR 92/20
Legislative references: TAA 1953 Pt IVAAA ITAA 1997 705-60 ITAA 1997 705-95(b)(i) ITAA 1997 705-95(b)(ii)
Subject references: ACA acquired profits allocable cost amount consolidation cost setting losses profits recouped losses step 4 tax cost setting amount transitional consolidated group