Class Ruling CR 2011/98
Date of effect: 1 April 2011

What this ruling is about: 1. This Ruling sets out the Commissioner's opinion on the way in which the relevant provision(s) identified below apply to the defined class of entities, who take part in the scheme to which this Ruling relates. Relevant provision(s) 2. The relevant provisions dealt with in this Ruling are: All references in this Ruling are to the FBTAA unless otherwise stated. Class of entities 3. The class of entities to which this Ruling applies is those employers that are either subject to the provisions of section 57A or section 65J that make use of a Wakefield-Citi Leisure Venue & Accommodation Prepaid Charge Card facility. Qualifications 4. The Commissioner makes this Ruling based on the precise scheme identified in this Ruling. 5. The class of entities defined in this Ruling may rely on its contents provided the scheme actually carried out is carried out in accordance with the scheme described in paragraphs 9 to 31 of this Ruling. 6. If the scheme actually carried out is materially different from the scheme that is described in this Ruling, then: 7. This work is copyright. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968 , no part may be reproduced by any process without prior written permission from the Commonwealth. Requests and inquiries concerning reproduction and rights should be addressed to:

Class of entities or scheme: 3. The class of entities to which this Ruling applies is those employers that are either subject to the provisions of section 57A or section 65J that make use of a Wakefield-Citi Leisure Venue & Accommodation Prepaid Charge Card facility. | Qualifications: 4. The Commissioner makes this Ruling based on the precise scheme identified in this Ruling. 5. The class of entities defined in this Ruling may rely on its contents provided the scheme actually carried out is carried out in accordance with the scheme described in paragraphs 9 to 31 of this Ruling. 6. If the scheme actually carried out is materially different from the scheme that is described in this Ruling, then: 7. This work is copyright. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968 , no part may be reproduced by any process without prior written permission from the Commonwealth. Requests and inquiries concerning reproduction and rights should be addressed to: 8. This Ruling applies from 1 April 2011. However, this Ruling will not apply to taxpayers to the extent that it conflicts with the terms of a settlement of a dispute agreed to before the date of issue of this Ruling (see paragraphs 75 and 76 of Taxation Ruling TR 2006/10). 9. The following description of the scheme is based on information provided by the applicant. The following documents, or relevant parts of them form part of and are to be read with the description: Note: certain information has been provided on a commercial-in-confidence basis and will not be disclosed or released under Freedom of Information legislation. 10. Under the scheme a series of agreements will be entered into between: | Referrer Agreement: 11. The Referrer Agreement sets out: 12. Under the terms of the agreement, Wakefield will provide services in relation to certain Citi charge cards; including the Citi Leisure Venue & Accommodation Prepaid Charge Card (the Card). The services provided by Wakefield include: 13. Also under the agreement, Citi will engage with Wakefield and receive instructions in relation to: | Agreement between Wakefield and the employer: 14. Under the terms of this agreement, a participating employer will appoint Wakefield to provide salary packaging services. The services provided by Wakefield will include: | Card Payer Agreement: 15. Under the terms of the Card Payer Agreement the employer agrees to provide each applicant with relevant information including a copy of the 'Application Form', an up-to-date 'Terms of Use and Product Disclosure Statement and a Financial Services Guide'. 16. Also under the terms of this agreement; Citi undertakes that where a prepaid card is cancelled or expires and the cardholder is not issued with a new prepaid card, Citi will transfer any funds remaining to the credit of the card to Wakefield for remittance to the employer to be paid to the Cardholder (employee) as salary subject to PAYG. | Agreement between Citi and the Cardholder (employee): 17. The 'Terms of Use and Product Disclosure Statement' operates as a contract between the Cardholder and Citi. It describes the rights and obligations between the Cardholder and Citi. 18. As set out in the statement: | Agreement between employer and employee: 19. The agreement between the employer and employee will be an effective salary sacrifice arrangement. [1] Under the terms of the agreement the employer will agree to discharge the employee's obligation to Citi that arises from the use of the Card. To do this, Wakefield on behalf of the employer will regularly transfer an agreed amount to Citi. 20. The amounts transferred to Citi by the employer will be held by Citi until they are used to discharge the Cardholder's obligation to Citi that arises from the use of the Card, or are returned to the employer. 21. In explaining how the Leisure Venue & Accommodation Prepaid Charge Card operates the brochure titled 'Leisure Venue & Accommodation Card' advises the Card can be used for payments relating to venue hire, including expenses necessary for the operation of the venue (tables, chairs etc) and accommodation costs that are used for leisure such as a weekend away or an extended holiday. The amount of expenditure will be limited to the amount of funds held in the Card account. 22. The brochure provides the following examples of venues for which the Leisure Venue & Accommodation Prepaid Charge Card can be used: 23. The brochure provides the following examples of accommodation for which the Leisure Venue & Accommodation Prepaid Charge Card can be used: 24. The brochure also advises the Card can only be used for the hire cost and the total amount must be paid for on the Card. The Card cannot be used to pay for expenses such as dry cleaning, phone bills, mini bar and room service. | The use of the Card: 25. A Cardholder will use the Card to pay a merchant who uses the relevant payment system. When the Card is used, Citi will authorise and settle the transaction with the merchant's bank. [2] 26. Each authorised payment will initiate a charge to the Cardholder's account. Under the terms and conditions of the agreement between the Cardholder and Citi, the Cardholder is liable to Citi for all amounts charged to the Cardholder's account including fees and charges. 27. Citi will discharge the Cardholder's obligation by applying the funds that relate to the Cardholder's account against the debt on the Card account. This will usually happen approximately two days after the obligation arises. 28. Citi will send Wakefield a transaction file on a periodic basis. The transaction file will list the transactions that have occurred. This file will be reviewed by Wakefield to identify any transactions that do not involve the hire or lease of a leisure venue or accommodation. 29. If the review of the transaction file identifies a Card that has been used for a transaction that does not involve the hire or lease of a leisure venue or of accommodation, Wakefield will advise the employer who may take disciplinary action and Citi who may cancel the Card. Any such transactions will not be treated as an entertainment facility leasing expense for the purposes of calculating the employer's fringe benefits tax liability and the employee's reportable fringe benefit amount. 30. At the end of the fringe benefits tax (FBT) year the account balance will either be returned to the employer or carried forward to the following FBT year. If the balance is returned to the employer, it will be paid to the employee as salary subject to PAYG. 31. On termination of employment the Card will be cancelled, any debts that arose prior to the date of cancellation will be discharged and any remaining balance will be returned to the employer to be paid to the employee as salary subject to PAYG. 32. The use of a Leisure Venue & Accommodation Prepaid Charge Card to pay for an entertainment facility leasing expense will be a 'tax-exempt body entertainment benefit' under section 38. 33. Where the Leisure Venue & Accommodation Prepaid Charge Card is used to pay for an entertainment facility leasing expense the benefit will be an exempt benefit where the employer comes within section 57A. 34. Benefits that constitute an entertainment facility leasing expense are disregarded for the purpose of the capping thresholds in determining the employer's 'aggregate non-exempt amount' under subsection 5B(1E) for an employer subject to the provisions of section 57A. 35. The use of the Card for the payment of an entertainment facility leasing expense will not reduce the amount of rebate available to a rebatable employer under section 65J as a benefit whose taxable value is wholly or partially attributable to an entertainment facility leasing expense will not form part of the employer's 'aggregate non-rebatable amount' in the subsection 65J(2A) rebate calculation. 36. The provision of benefits, using the Card facility, are not GST-creditable benefits in terms of section 149A and, therefore, are type 2 benefits for the purposes of calculating the fringe benefits taxable amount of a rebatable employer under subsection 5B(1A) or the amount of the rebate under subsections 65J(2A). 37. The provision of a benefit whose taxable value is wholly or partly attributable to entertainment facility leasing expenses will be an excluded fringe benefit for the purposes of paragraph 5E(3)(c). As such, the value of the benefit will be excluded from the reportable fringe benefits provisions in Part XIB. Commissioner of Taxation 16 November 2011 | Will the taxable values of the benefits that arise from the discharge of the employee's liability be wholly or partly attributable to entertainment facility leasing expenses?: 38. An employee is able to use the Card to pay for the cost of hiring a room at a reception centre, a room at a club, a marquee, a corporate box for a social event, a boat or plane for the purpose of entertainment, a holiday house, a room at a hotel/motel, a room at a resort, a room in a bed & breakfast or a self-contained apartment for a holiday. 39. The definition of 'entertainment facility leasing expenses' in subsection 136(1) states: | Expenses incurred by a person: 40. This condition is met when the Cardholder uses the Card to pay for the hire or lease of a leisure venue or accommodation. | In Hiring or Leasing: 41. This condition is met when the Cardholder enters into an agreement for the hire or lease of a leisure venue or accommodation. | A corporate box; boat; plane; other premises or facilities: 42. An employee may use the Card to pay for the cost of hiring or leasing a corporate box. When this occurs, the employee's expenditure will be for hiring or leasing a corporate box as set out in paragraph (a) of the definition of 'entertainment facility leasing expenses' in subsection 136(1). 43. Alternatively, the employee may use the Card to pay for the cost of hiring or leasing a boat or a plane for the purpose of entertainment. When this occurs, the employee's expenditure will be for hiring or leasing a boat or plane for the purpose of entertainment as set out in paragraph (b) of the definition of 'entertainment facility leasing expenses' in subsection 136(1). 44. Alternatively, the employee may use the Card to pay for the cost of hiring or leasing a room at a reception centre, a room at a club, a marquee, a holiday house, a room at a hotel/motel, a room at a resort, a room in a bed & breakfast or a self contained apartment for a holiday. 45. The words 'other premises or facility' as they are used in the definition of 'entertainment facility leasing expenses' have a wide meaning which includes buildings, part of buildings or other structures including temporary structures. Therefore, the employee's expenditure in the situations referred to in paragraph 44 will be for leasing or hiring 'other premises or facilities' as set out in paragraph (c) of the definition of 'entertainment facility leasing expenses' in subsection 136(1). | For the purpose of the provision of entertainment: 46. Subsection 136(1) defines 'entertainment': 47. Taxation Determination TD 94 / 55 Income tax : when does providing an item of property constitute the provision of entertainment within the meaning of subsection 51AE(3) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 ?, states that in determining whether providing an item of property constitutes entertainment, regard should be had to all the circumstances of the case. In particular, regard should be given to the character of the entertainment to be derived from the item of property provided. Specifically, in Example 2 in TD 94/55, costs incurred in providing holiday accommodation are incurred in providing property that would constitute the provision of entertainment. 48. Therefore, this condition will be met where the boat, plane, premise or facility is hired or leased for a social event or a holiday. | But does not include expenses attributable to the provision of food, drink or advertising: 49. This condition will be met where the expenses incurred are not attributable to the provision of food, drink or advertising. | Type of benefit: 50. A 'tax-exempt body entertainment benefit' will arise under section 38 where an entity that is wholly or partly exempt from income tax incurs 'non-deductible exempt entertainment expenditure'. 51. The employer will be either a not-for-profit organisation or a government body. Both of these types of organisation are exempt from income tax. 52. In general terms, expenditure will be 'non-deductible exempt entertainment expenditure' if section 32-5 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997) would prevent an income tax deduction from being claimed for the expenditure if the entity incurring the expense was subject to income tax. As section 32-5 would apply in relation to the use of the Card to pay for an entertainment facility leasing expense, the payment will be 'non-deductible exempt entertainment expenditure'. 53. Therefore, the use of the Card to pay for the hire or lease of an entertainment facility will be a 'tax-exempt body entertainment benefit' under section 38. | Employers subject to section 57A: 54. Section 57A provides that certain employers are generally exempt from fringe benefits tax. This section applies to employers that are an endorsed public benevolent institution, certain hospitals, an employer who provides public ambulance services (or services that support those service) where the employee is predominantly involved in connection with the provision of those services, or an endorsed health promotion charity. 55. The exemption in section 57A also applies to benefits provided to an employee of a government body where the duties of employment are exclusively performed in, or in connection with, certain hospitals. 56. However, these exemptions are subject to the capping provisions contained in section 5B. 57. Subsection 5B(1E) limits the exemption to $17,000 grossed-up taxable value per employee for employers who are public or non-profit hospitals, or who provide a public ambulance service. The $17,000 threshold also applies in respect of employees of a government body whose duties are exclusively performed in, or in connection with, a public or non-profit hospital. Such employers are liable for full FBT on the value of benefits provided in excess of this threshold. 58. All other employers to which section 57A applies will have a capping threshold of $30,000 grossed-up taxable value per employee. Such employers are liable for fringe benefits tax on the value of benefits provided in excess of this threshold. 59. However, any employer to which section 57A applies, will not be liable for fringe benefits tax on benefits whose taxable values are wholly or partly attributable to entertainment facility leasing expenses. 60. This results from the operation of step 1 of the method statement contained in subsection 5B(1L) which specifically disregards the benefits whose taxable values are wholly or partly attributable to entertainment facility leasing expenses in calculating an employer's aggregate non-exempt amount. | Rebatable employers under section 65J: 61. Section 65J provides that certain non-government and non-profit organisations (rebatable employers) are entitled to have their FBT liability reduced by a rebate. The section does not apply to public benevolent institutions nor to health promotion charities. 62. The rebate determined under subsection 65J(2A) is calculated as follows: 63. Rebatable employers have a capping threshold of $30,000 grossed-up taxable value per employee. If the total grossed-up taxable value of benefits is more than $30,000 a rebate cannot be claimed for the FBT liability on the excess amount (or on the aggregate non-rebatable amount). 64. The amount of gross tax is the amount of tax that would be payable on the fringe benefits taxable amount of the rebatable employer assuming that section 65J had not been enacted. 65. The rebatable employer's aggregate non-rebatable amount is calculated by aggregating the product of each employee's individual grossed-up non-rebatable amount less the $30,000 cap multiplied by the then FBT rate. 66. Each employee's individual grossed-up non-rebatable amount is determined by multiplying the employee's type 1 and type 2 individual base non-rebatable amounts by the applicable gross-up rate. However, step 1 of the method statement contained in subsection 65J(2H) specifically disregards the taxable value of benefits whose taxable values are wholly or partly attributable to entertainment facility leasing expenses in determining an employee's individual base non-rebatable amount. 67. Consequently, the use of the Card to pay for an entertainment facility leasing expense does not form any part of the rebatable employer's aggregate non-rebatable amount in the rebate calculation. Therefore, the use of the Card to pay for an entertainment facility leasing expense will not reduce the amount of rebate available to a rebatable employer. 68. However, benefits whose taxable values are wholly or partly attributable to entertainment facility leasing expenses will still be included in the calculation of the amount of the gross tax in the rebate calculation. Therefore, the discharge of an obligation that relates to an entertainment facility leasing expense has an effective 48% rebate of the benefit's taxed grossed-up value. | Will the benefit be a type 2 benefit for a rebatable employer?: 69. To determine whether a benefit provided under this scheme is a type 1 or type 2 benefit, it is necessary to ascertain whether the benefit is a GST-creditable benefit as defined in section 149A. 70. Taxation Ruling TR 2001/2 [3] points out that for the purposes of section 149A, to be a GST-creditable benefit, the provider of the benefit must be entitled to an input tax credit because of either: 71. The second point in paragraph 70 of this Ruling does not apply as subsection 149A(2) of the FBTAA only applies if the benefit was acquired or imported by the provider. In this case, there is a reimbursement for the purposes of the GST Act. Consequently, only the first point in paragraph 70 needs to be considered. 72. Paragraph 86 of Goods and Services Tax Ruling GSTR 2001/3 [4] states that Division 111 of the GST Act provides that an employer makes an acquisition that can be a creditable acquisition, subject to certain conditions, where: 73. Paragraph 89 of GSTR 2001/3 points out, amongst other things, that for Division 111 of the GST Act to apply, the arrangement between the employer and the employee needs to be for the reimbursement of a particular purchase or purchases incurred on the credit card. 74. The discharging of the Cardholder's debt obligation to Citi as described in the scheme involves no more than reimbursing the outstanding balance owing by the Cardholder at the particular time without reference to any specific purchase or purchases. Consistent with paragraph 89 of GSTR 2001/3, this is an input taxed financial supply that does not meet the requirements of Division 111 of the GST Act. 75. Therefore, the benefits provided under the scheme are not GST-creditable benefits for the purposes of section 149A. 76. As the relevant benefits in this case are not GST-creditable benefits they will always be treated as being 'type 2' benefits for: | Reportable fringe benefits amount: 77. Part XIB requires the taxable values of certain benefits to be included in the reportable fringe benefits amount of the relevant employee. Where the Card is used to pay for an entertainment facility leasing expense, paragraph 5E(3)(c) will apply to make the benefit an excluded benefit. 78. This conclusion holds regardless of whether the employer is subject to the provisions of section 57A or is a rebatable employer under section 65J. 79. The following is a detailed contents list for this Ruling: Not previously issued as a draft

Ruling: 32. The use of a Leisure Venue & Accommodation Prepaid Charge Card to pay for an entertainment facility leasing expense will be a 'tax-exempt body entertainment benefit' under section 38. 33. Where the Leisure Venue & Accommodation Prepaid Charge Card is used to pay for an entertainment facility leasing expense the benefit will be an exempt benefit where the employer comes within section 57A. 34. Benefits that constitute an entertainment facility leasing expense are disregarded for the purpose of the capping thresholds in determining the employer's 'aggregate non-exempt amount' under subsection 5B(1E) for an employer subject to the provisions of section 57A. 35. The use of the Card for the payment of an entertainment facility leasing expense will not reduce the amount of rebate available to a rebatable employer under section 65J as a benefit whose taxable value is wholly or partially attributable to an entertainment facility leasing expense will not form part of the employer's 'aggregate non-rebatable amount' in the subsection 65J(2A) rebate calculation. 36. The provision of benefits, using the Card facility, are not GST-creditable benefits in terms of section 149A and, therefore, are type 2 benefits for the purposes of calculating the fringe benefits taxable amount of a rebatable employer under subsection 5B(1A) or the amount of the rebate under subsections 65J(2A). 37. The provision of a benefit whose taxable value is wholly or partly attributable to entertainment facility leasing expenses will be an excluded fringe benefit for the purposes of paragraph 5E(3)(c). As such, the value of the benefit will be excluded from the reportable fringe benefits provisions in Part XIB. Commissioner of Taxation 16 November 2011


Appendix: Will the taxable values of the benefits that arise from the discharge of the employee's liability be wholly or partly attributable to entertainment facility leasing expenses?: 38. An employee is able to use the Card to pay for the cost of hiring a room at a reception centre, a room at a club, a marquee, a corporate box for a social event, a boat or plane for the purpose of entertainment, a holiday house, a room at a hotel/motel, a room at a resort, a room in a bed & breakfast or a self-contained apartment for a holiday. 39. The definition of 'entertainment facility leasing expenses' in subsection 136(1) states: | Expenses incurred by a person: 40. This condition is met when the Cardholder uses the Card to pay for the hire or lease of a leisure venue or accommodation. | In Hiring or Leasing: 41. This condition is met when the Cardholder enters into an agreement for the hire or lease of a leisure venue or accommodation. | A corporate box; boat; plane; other premises or facilities: 42. An employee may use the Card to pay for the cost of hiring or leasing a corporate box. When this occurs, the employee's expenditure will be for hiring or leasing a corporate box as set out in paragraph (a) of the definition of 'entertainment facility leasing expenses' in subsection 136(1). 43. Alternatively, the employee may use the Card to pay for the cost of hiring or leasing a boat or a plane for the purpose of entertainment. When this occurs, the employee's expenditure will be for hiring or leasing a boat or plane for the purpose of entertainment as set out in paragraph (b) of the definition of 'entertainment facility leasing expenses' in subsection 136(1). 44. Alternatively, the employee may use the Card to pay for the cost of hiring or leasing a room at a reception centre, a room at a club, a marquee, a holiday house, a room at a hotel/motel, a room at a resort, a room in a bed & breakfast or a self contained apartment for a holiday. 45. The words 'other premises or facility' as they are used in the definition of 'entertainment facility leasing expenses' have a wide meaning which includes buildings, part of buildings or other structures including temporary structures. Therefore, the employee's expenditure in the situations referred to in paragraph 44 will be for leasing or hiring 'other premises or facilities' as set out in paragraph (c) of the definition of 'entertainment facility leasing expenses' in subsection 136(1). | For the purpose of the provision of entertainment: 46. Subsection 136(1) defines 'entertainment': 47. Taxation Determination TD 94 / 55 Income tax : when does providing an item of property constitute the provision of entertainment within the meaning of subsection 51AE(3) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 ?, states that in determining whether providing an item of property constitutes entertainment, regard should be had to all the circumstances of the case. In particular, regard should be given to the character of the entertainment to be derived from the item of property provided. Specifically, in Example 2 in TD 94/55, costs incurred in providing holiday accommodation are incurred in providing property that would constitute the provision of entertainment. 48. Therefore, this condition will be met where the boat, plane, premise or facility is hired or leased for a social event or a holiday. | But does not include expenses attributable to the provision of food, drink or advertising: 49. This condition will be met where the expenses incurred are not attributable to the provision of food, drink or advertising. | Type of benefit: 50. A 'tax-exempt body entertainment benefit' will arise under section 38 where an entity that is wholly or partly exempt from income tax incurs 'non-deductible exempt entertainment expenditure'. 51. The employer will be either a not-for-profit organisation or a government body. Both of these types of organisation are exempt from income tax. 52. In general terms, expenditure will be 'non-deductible exempt entertainment expenditure' if section 32-5 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997) would prevent an income tax deduction from being claimed for the expenditure if the entity incurring the expense was subject to income tax. As section 32-5 would apply in relation to the use of the Card to pay for an entertainment facility leasing expense, the payment will be 'non-deductible exempt entertainment expenditure'. 53. Therefore, the use of the Card to pay for the hire or lease of an entertainment facility will be a 'tax-exempt body entertainment benefit' under section 38. | Employers subject to section 57A: 54. Section 57A provides that certain employers are generally exempt from fringe benefits tax. This section applies to employers that are an endorsed public benevolent institution, certain hospitals, an employer who provides public ambulance services (or services that support those service) where the employee is predominantly involved in connection with the provision of those services, or an endorsed health promotion charity. 55. The exemption in section 57A also applies to benefits provided to an employee of a government body where the duties of employment are exclusively performed in, or in connection with, certain hospitals. 56. However, these exemptions are subject to the capping provisions contained in section 5B. 57. Subsection 5B(1E) limits the exemption to $17,000 grossed-up taxable value per employee for employers who are public or non-profit hospitals, or who provide a public ambulance service. The $17,000 threshold also applies in respect of employees of a government body whose duties are exclusively performed in, or in connection with, a public or non-profit hospital. Such employers are liable for full FBT on the value of benefits provided in excess of this threshold. 58. All other employers to which section 57A applies will have a capping threshold of $30,000 grossed-up taxable value per employee. Such employers are liable for fringe benefits tax on the value of benefits provided in excess of this threshold. 59. However, any employer to which section 57A applies, will not be liable for fringe benefits tax on benefits whose taxable values are wholly or partly attributable to entertainment facility leasing expenses. 60. This results from the operation of step 1 of the method statement contained in subsection 5B(1L) which specifically disregards the benefits whose taxable values are wholly or partly attributable to entertainment facility leasing expenses in calculating an employer's aggregate non-exempt amount. | Rebatable employers under section 65J: 61. Section 65J provides that certain non-government and non-profit organisations (rebatable employers) are entitled to have their FBT liability reduced by a rebate. The section does not apply to public benevolent institutions nor to health promotion charities. 62. The rebate determined under subsection 65J(2A) is calculated as follows: 63. Rebatable employers have a capping threshold of $30,000 grossed-up taxable value per employee. If the total grossed-up taxable value of benefits is more than $30,000 a rebate cannot be claimed for the FBT liability on the excess amount (or on the aggregate non-rebatable amount). 64. The amount of gross tax is the amount of tax that would be payable on the fringe benefits taxable amount of the rebatable employer assuming that section 65J had not been enacted. 65. The rebatable employer's aggregate non-rebatable amount is calculated by aggregating the product of each employee's individual grossed-up non-rebatable amount less the $30,000 cap multiplied by the then FBT rate. 66. Each employee's individual grossed-up non-rebatable amount is determined by multiplying the employee's type 1 and type 2 individual base non-rebatable amounts by the applicable gross-up rate. However, step 1 of the method statement contained in subsection 65J(2H) specifically disregards the taxable value of benefits whose taxable values are wholly or partly attributable to entertainment facility leasing expenses in determining an employee's individual base non-rebatable amount. 67. Consequently, the use of the Card to pay for an entertainment facility leasing expense does not form any part of the rebatable employer's aggregate non-rebatable amount in the rebate calculation. Therefore, the use of the Card to pay for an entertainment facility leasing expense will not reduce the amount of rebate available to a rebatable employer. 68. However, benefits whose taxable values are wholly or partly attributable to entertainment facility leasing expenses will still be included in the calculation of the amount of the gross tax in the rebate calculation. Therefore, the discharge of an obligation that relates to an entertainment facility leasing expense has an effective 48% rebate of the benefit's taxed grossed-up value. | Will the benefit be a type 2 benefit for a rebatable employer?: 69. To determine whether a benefit provided under this scheme is a type 1 or type 2 benefit, it is necessary to ascertain whether the benefit is a GST-creditable benefit as defined in section 149A. 70. Taxation Ruling TR 2001/2 [3] points out that for the purposes of section 149A, to be a GST-creditable benefit, the provider of the benefit must be entitled to an input tax credit because of either: 71. The second point in paragraph 70 of this Ruling does not apply as subsection 149A(2) of the FBTAA only applies if the benefit was acquired or imported by the provider. In this case, there is a reimbursement for the purposes of the GST Act. Consequently, only the first point in paragraph 70 needs to be considered. 72. Paragraph 86 of Goods and Services Tax Ruling GSTR 2001/3 [4] states that Division 111 of the GST Act provides that an employer makes an acquisition that can be a creditable acquisition, subject to certain conditions, where: 73. Paragraph 89 of GSTR 2001/3 points out, amongst other things, that for Division 111 of the GST Act to apply, the arrangement between the employer and the employee needs to be for the reimbursement of a particular purchase or purchases incurred on the credit card. 74. The discharging of the Cardholder's debt obligation to Citi as described in the scheme involves no more than reimbursing the outstanding balance owing by the Cardholder at the particular time without reference to any specific purchase or purchases. Consistent with paragraph 89 of GSTR 2001/3, this is an input taxed financial supply that does not meet the requirements of Division 111 of the GST Act. 75. Therefore, the benefits provided under the scheme are not GST-creditable benefits for the purposes of section 149A. 76. As the relevant benefits in this case are not GST-creditable benefits they will always be treated as being 'type 2' benefits for: | Reportable fringe benefits amount: 77. Part XIB requires the taxable values of certain benefits to be included in the reportable fringe benefits amount of the relevant employee. Where the Card is used to pay for an entertainment facility leasing expense, paragraph 5E(3)(c) will apply to make the benefit an excluded benefit. 78. This conclusion holds regardless of whether the employer is subject to the provisions of section 57A or is a rebatable employer under section 65J.


What this Ruling is about | NOT LEGALLY BINDING SECTION: | A public ruling is an expression of the Commissioner's opinion about the way in which a relevant provision applies, or would apply, to entities generally or to a class of entities in relation to a particular scheme or a class of schemes. | If you rely on this ruling, the Commissioner must apply the law to you in the way set out in the ruling (unless the Commissioner is satisfied that the ruling is incorrect and disadvantages you, in which case the law may be applied to you in a way that is more favourable for you - provided the Commissioner is not prevented from doing so by a time limit imposed by the law). You will be protected from having to pay any underpaid tax, penalty or interest in respect of the matters covered by this ruling if it turns out that it does not correctly state how the relevant provision applies to you. | entertainment has the meaning given by section 32-10 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 . | Will the taxable values that arise from the discharge of the employee's liability be wholly or partly attributable to entertainment facility leasing expenses? | Appendix 2 - Detailed contents list


Related rulings: GSTR 2001/3 TD 94/55 TR 2001/2 TR 2001/10 TR 2006/10
Legislative references: ANTS(GST)A 1999 Div 111 FBTAA 1986 FBTAA 1986 5B FBTAA 1986 5B(1A) FBTAA 1986 5B(1E) FBTAA 1986 5B(1L) FBTAA 1986 5E(3)(c) FBTAA 1986 38 FBTAA 1986 57A FBTAA 1986 65J FBTAA 1986 65J(2A) FBTAA 1986 65J(2H) FBTAA 1986 Part XIB FBTAA 1986 136(1) FBTAA 1986 149A FBTAA 1986 149A(2) ITAA 1997 32-5 TAA 1953 Copyright Act 1968
Subject references: entertainment expenses entertainment expenses excluded fringe benefits exempt benefits FBT salary packaging FBT salary sacrifice FBT tax-exempt body fringe benefit fringe benefits tax health promotion charity public benevolent institution rebatable employer reportable fringe benefits tax-exempt body entertainment fringe benefits