Class Ruling CR 2025/83

What this ruling is about: 1. This Ruling sets out the fringe benefits tax consequences for employers providing airline travel benefits administered by Salary Packaging Australia Pty Limited (SPA Pty Ltd) to fly-in fly-out (FIFO) 'qualifying employees'. 2. Details of this scheme are set out in paragraphs 8 to 18 of this Ruling. 3. All legislative references in this Ruling are to the Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986 (FBTAA), unless otherwise indicated. Note: by issuing this Ruling, the ATO is not endorsing this product. Potential purchasers or users must form their own view about the product. Who this Ruling applies to 4. This Ruling applies to you if you are an employer with qualifying employees provided with airline travel benefits administered by SPA Pty Ltd. When this Ruling applies 5. This Ruling applies from 1 April 2025 to 31 March 2030. 6. The provision of airline travel to the qualifying employee is a residual benefit pursuant to section 45. 7. The residual benefit that arises from the provision of airline travel to the qualifying employee is an exempt benefit pursuant to subsection 47(7). 8. The following description of the scheme is based on information provided by the applicant. If the scheme is not carried out as described, this Ruling cannot be relied upon. 9. SPA Pty Ltd administers FIFO travel benefits for its employer clients who provide FIFO travel to their qualifying employees under a salary sacrificing arrangement. 10. The employer clients of SPA Pty Ltd require qualifying employees to travel, either domestically or internationally, between their usual places of residence (in Australia or overseas) and their usual places of employment in remote parts of Australia, on a FIFO basis. 11. The scheme relates to employers that offer this benefit through SPA Pty Ltd, noting that the benefit is only provided to 'qualifying employees'  that is, employees working in 'remote areas' for fringe benefits tax purposes and working on a FIFO roster basis. 12. Each qualifying employee: 13. Some of the employers pay for part of the travel between a qualifying employee's usual place of residence and usual place of employment outside of any salary packaging arrangement. For instance, they may pay for travel between a capital city airport and the place of employment. The arrangement with SPA Pty Ltd then allows the qualifying employee to salary package the travel costs (for flights) between their home and the capital city airport. 14. SPA Pty Ltd may manage salary packaging arrangements for either the entire travel between a qualifying employee's home and place of work, or just part of that travel. 15. An employer client will enter into an agreement with SPA Pty Ltd to provide the relevant FIFO travel benefit to its qualifying employees. Under that agreement, SPA Pty Ltd will act on the employer's behalf to facilitate the booking and payment of relevant qualifying employees' flights. This is carried out in accordance with the employer's agreement with a travel supplier. 16. The employer client will enter into a valid salary packaging arrangement with the qualifying employee. Under the agreement, the qualifying employee agrees to a salary sacrifice amount in respect of FIFO travel and their pre-tax salary is reduced accordingly. 17. Payment of an amount equivalent to the salary sacrificed amount is made by the employer, by regular transfer, to a bank account held by SPA Pty Ltd on the employer's behalf. The funds are held by SPA Pty Ltd until the travel supplier sends an invoice for payment. The invoice specifies air travel details for the qualifying employee and is addressed to, and payable by, the employer. The invoice is then paid by SPA Pty Ltd (to the extent sufficient funds have been sacrificed by the qualifying employee) acting on behalf of the employer, out of the salary sacrificed funds held for this purpose. 18. If a qualifying employee's employment is terminated while funds they have sacrificed remain unspent, those funds are paid back to the employer, who pays them out to the qualifying employee as salary or wages with the appropriate pay as you go amount withheld. Commissioner of Taxation 3 December 2025 Is there a benefit? 19. The provision of the travel, under a salary sacrifice arrangement, will give rise to a 'benefit' as defined in subsection 136(1). 20. The benefit will be a fringe benefit where it meets the definition of 'fringe benefit' as defined in subsection 136(1). 21. The definition of fringe benefit in subsection 136(1) excludes at paragraph (g) a benefit that is an exempt benefit in relation to the year of tax. 22. For the purposes of this Ruling, the relevant exemption is the exemption provided under subsection 47(7) for a residual benefit that consists of the provision of FIFO transport. Is the benefit a residual benefit? 23. As section 47 provides for exempt residual benefits, it is necessary to consider whether the benefit is a residual benefit. 24. Section 45 provides that a benefit will be a residual benefit if it is not a benefit by virtue of a provision of Subdivision A of Divisions 2 to 11 (inclusive). Divisions 2 to 4 and 6 to 10 are not relevant to this scheme. Division 5 and Division 11 may be relevant to this scheme. Expense payment benefits 25. With respect to Division 5, section 20 states that an expense payment benefit will arise where a person (in this section referred to as the provider): 26. Under this arrangement, the travel supplier issues an invoice to the employer for payment, rather than to the qualifying employee incurring the expense directly. 27. SPA Pty Ltd then acts on behalf of the employer, in drawing funds held on behalf of the employer and arranging payment of the invoice. 28. The cost of the flight is paid for by the employer through use of the salary sacrificed funds and the employer is discharging their own obligation. The employer is, therefore, not discharging an obligation of another person to pay a third person, nor providing a reimbursement to another person in respect of expenditure incurred by that person. 29. The benefit is, therefore, not an expense payment benefit under section 20. Property benefits 30. Division 11 applies to property fringe benefits. Section 40 states: 31. Subsection 136(1) provides the following definitions relevant to property benefits: 32. The term 'goods' is not defined in the FBTAA and therefore takes its ordinary meaning. The Macquarie Dictionary [1] defines the term 'goods' relevantly as: 33. The airline ticket does not meet the definition of goods and is therefore not tangible property. 34. Paragraph (e) of the definition of 'intangible property' in subsection 136(1) of the FBTAA relevantly excludes leases or licences in respect of real property or tangible property. 35. 'Licence' is not defined in the FBTAA, the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (ITAA 1936) or the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997. It therefore takes on its ordinary meaning. 36. The Macquarie Dictionary [2] defines the term 'licence' (as relevant here) as: 37. The ticket provides the qualifying employee with the formal permission to receive transport on the aeroplane and is, therefore, not intangible property. 38. As the airline ticket is neither tangible nor intangible property, the provision of the ticket is not a property benefit. 39. Therefore, the benefit provided by the employer does not fall within any of the provisions of Subdivision A of Divisions 2 to 11 and, as such, is a residual benefit per section 45. Is the benefit exempt under subsection 47(7)? 40. As the benefit is a residual benefit, consideration needs to be given to whether the benefit is an exempt residual benefit under subsection 47(7). 41. Subsection 47(7) states: Is the employee's usual place of employment at a remote location in Australia or overseas, or on oil rigs or other installations at sea? 42. This Ruling only applies to qualifying employees working in remote locations. A remote location is one that is not located in or adjacent to an 'eligible urban area' as defined in section 140. According to paragraph 140(1)(a), an 'eligible urban area' is an urban centre that is either: 43. According to paragraph 140(1)(b), an area is 'adjacent to an eligible urban area' if it is either: Are the employees provided with accommodation, at or near the worksite on working days by the employer, an associate of the employer or an arranger? 44. The qualifying employees are provided with residential accommodation during their working days, at or near their usual place of employment, by the employer. Do the employees, on a regular basis, work for a number of days followed by a number of days off, and return to their usual place of residence on their days off? 45. The qualifying employees work for a number of days and have a number of days off. On completion of their working days, they travel from that usual place of employment to their usual place of residence and, on completion of the days off, return from their place of residence back to that usual place of employment. These rosters are normal cyclical FIFO arrangements. Is the employee regularly provided with transport between their usual place of residence and place of employment? 46. The employer provides their qualifying employee with transport on a regular basis between their usual place of residence and place of employment. A whole or part of this is administered by SPA Pty Ltd. Having regard to the location of the 2 places, is it unreasonable to expect the employee to travel to and from work on a daily basis? 47. It would be unreasonable to expect the qualifying employee to travel on a daily basis on work days between the qualifying employee's usual place of employment and their usual place of residence, having regard to the location of these places. 48. The requirements of subsection 47(7) are met and the provision of the FIFO travel is therefore exempt from fringe benefits tax. © AUSTRALIAN TAXATION OFFICE FOR THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute this material as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).

Class of entities or scheme: 8. The following description of the scheme is based on information provided by the applicant. If the scheme is not carried out as described, this Ruling cannot be relied upon. 9. SPA Pty Ltd administers FIFO travel benefits for its employer clients who provide FIFO travel to their qualifying employees under a salary sacrificing arrangement. 10. The employer clients of SPA Pty Ltd require qualifying employees to travel, either domestically or internationally, between their usual places of residence (in Australia or overseas) and their usual places of employment in remote parts of Australia, on a FIFO basis. 11. The scheme relates to employers that offer this benefit through SPA Pty Ltd, noting that the benefit is only provided to 'qualifying employees'  that is, employees working in 'remote areas' for fringe benefits tax purposes and working on a FIFO roster basis. 12. Each qualifying employee: 13. Some of the employers pay for part of the travel between a qualifying employee's usual place of residence and usual place of employment outside of any salary packaging arrangement. For instance, they may pay for travel between a capital city airport and the place of employment. The arrangement with SPA Pty Ltd then allows the qualifying employee to salary package the travel costs (for flights) between their home and the capital city airport. 14. SPA Pty Ltd may manage salary packaging arrangements for either the entire travel between a qualifying employee's home and place of work, or just part of that travel. 15. An employer client will enter into an agreement with SPA Pty Ltd to provide the relevant FIFO travel benefit to its qualifying employees. Under that agreement, SPA Pty Ltd will act on the employer's behalf to facilitate the booking and payment of relevant qualifying employees' flights. This is carried out in accordance with the employer's agreement with a travel supplier. 16. The employer client will enter into a valid salary packaging arrangement with the qualifying employee. Under the agreement, the qualifying employee agrees to a salary sacrifice amount in respect of FIFO travel and their pre-tax salary is reduced accordingly. 17. Payment of an amount equivalent to the salary sacrificed amount is made by the employer, by regular transfer, to a bank account held by SPA Pty Ltd on the employer's behalf. The funds are held by SPA Pty Ltd until the travel supplier sends an invoice for payment. The invoice specifies air travel details for the qualifying employee and is addressed to, and payable by, the employer. The invoice is then paid by SPA Pty Ltd (to the extent sufficient funds have been sacrificed by the qualifying employee) acting on behalf of the employer, out of the salary sacrificed funds held for this purpose. 18. If a qualifying employee's employment is terminated while funds they have sacrificed remain unspent, those funds are paid back to the employer, who pays them out to the qualifying employee as salary or wages with the appropriate pay as you go amount withheld. Commissioner of Taxation 3 December 2025

Ruling: 1. This Ruling sets out the fringe benefits tax consequences for employers providing airline travel benefits administered by Salary Packaging Australia Pty Limited (SPA Pty Ltd) to fly-in fly-out (FIFO) 'qualifying employees'. 2. Details of this scheme are set out in paragraphs 8 to 18 of this Ruling. 3. All legislative references in this Ruling are to the Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986 (FBTAA), unless otherwise indicated. Note: by issuing this Ruling, the ATO is not endorsing this product. Potential purchasers or users must form their own view about the product. | Who this Ruling applies to: 4. This Ruling applies to you if you are an employer with qualifying employees provided with airline travel benefits administered by SPA Pty Ltd. | When this Ruling applies: 5. This Ruling applies from 1 April 2025 to 31 March 2030. 6. The provision of airline travel to the qualifying employee is a residual benefit pursuant to section 45. 7. The residual benefit that arises from the provision of airline travel to the qualifying employee is an exempt benefit pursuant to subsection 47(7). 8. The following description of the scheme is based on information provided by the applicant. If the scheme is not carried out as described, this Ruling cannot be relied upon. 9. SPA Pty Ltd administers FIFO travel benefits for its employer clients who provide FIFO travel to their qualifying employees under a salary sacrificing arrangement. 10. The employer clients of SPA Pty Ltd require qualifying employees to travel, either domestically or internationally, between their usual places of residence (in Australia or overseas) and their usual places of employment in remote parts of Australia, on a FIFO basis. 11. The scheme relates to employers that offer this benefit through SPA Pty Ltd, noting that the benefit is only provided to 'qualifying employees'  that is, employees working in 'remote areas' for fringe benefits tax purposes and working on a FIFO roster basis. 12. Each qualifying employee: 13. Some of the employers pay for part of the travel between a qualifying employee's usual place of residence and usual place of employment outside of any salary packaging arrangement. For instance, they may pay for travel between a capital city airport and the place of employment. The arrangement with SPA Pty Ltd then allows the qualifying employee to salary package the travel costs (for flights) between their home and the capital city airport. 14. SPA Pty Ltd may manage salary packaging arrangements for either the entire travel between a qualifying employee's home and place of work, or just part of that travel. 15. An employer client will enter into an agreement with SPA Pty Ltd to provide the relevant FIFO travel benefit to its qualifying employees. Under that agreement, SPA Pty Ltd will act on the employer's behalf to facilitate the booking and payment of relevant qualifying employees' flights. This is carried out in accordance with the employer's agreement with a travel supplier. 16. The employer client will enter into a valid salary packaging arrangement with the qualifying employee. Under the agreement, the qualifying employee agrees to a salary sacrifice amount in respect of FIFO travel and their pre-tax salary is reduced accordingly. 17. Payment of an amount equivalent to the salary sacrificed amount is made by the employer, by regular transfer, to a bank account held by SPA Pty Ltd on the employer's behalf. The funds are held by SPA Pty Ltd until the travel supplier sends an invoice for payment. The invoice specifies air travel details for the qualifying employee and is addressed to, and payable by, the employer. The invoice is then paid by SPA Pty Ltd (to the extent sufficient funds have been sacrificed by the qualifying employee) acting on behalf of the employer, out of the salary sacrificed funds held for this purpose. 18. If a qualifying employee's employment is terminated while funds they have sacrificed remain unspent, those funds are paid back to the employer, who pays them out to the qualifying employee as salary or wages with the appropriate pay as you go amount withheld. Commissioner of Taxation 3 December 2025 | Is there a benefit?: 19. The provision of the travel, under a salary sacrifice arrangement, will give rise to a 'benefit' as defined in subsection 136(1). 20. The benefit will be a fringe benefit where it meets the definition of 'fringe benefit' as defined in subsection 136(1). 21. The definition of fringe benefit in subsection 136(1) excludes at paragraph (g) a benefit that is an exempt benefit in relation to the year of tax. 22. For the purposes of this Ruling, the relevant exemption is the exemption provided under subsection 47(7) for a residual benefit that consists of the provision of FIFO transport. | Is the benefit a residual benefit?: 23. As section 47 provides for exempt residual benefits, it is necessary to consider whether the benefit is a residual benefit. 24. Section 45 provides that a benefit will be a residual benefit if it is not a benefit by virtue of a provision of Subdivision A of Divisions 2 to 11 (inclusive). Divisions 2 to 4 and 6 to 10 are not relevant to this scheme. Division 5 and Division 11 may be relevant to this scheme. | Expense payment benefits: 25. With respect to Division 5, section 20 states that an expense payment benefit will arise where a person (in this section referred to as the provider): 26. Under this arrangement, the travel supplier issues an invoice to the employer for payment, rather than to the qualifying employee incurring the expense directly. 27. SPA Pty Ltd then acts on behalf of the employer, in drawing funds held on behalf of the employer and arranging payment of the invoice. 28. The cost of the flight is paid for by the employer through use of the salary sacrificed funds and the employer is discharging their own obligation. The employer is, therefore, not discharging an obligation of another person to pay a third person, nor providing a reimbursement to another person in respect of expenditure incurred by that person. 29. The benefit is, therefore, not an expense payment benefit under section 20. | Property benefits: 30. Division 11 applies to property fringe benefits. Section 40 states: 31. Subsection 136(1) provides the following definitions relevant to property benefits: 32. The term 'goods' is not defined in the FBTAA and therefore takes its ordinary meaning. The Macquarie Dictionary [1] defines the term 'goods' relevantly as: 33. The airline ticket does not meet the definition of goods and is therefore not tangible property. 34. Paragraph (e) of the definition of 'intangible property' in subsection 136(1) of the FBTAA relevantly excludes leases or licences in respect of real property or tangible property. 35. 'Licence' is not defined in the FBTAA, the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (ITAA 1936) or the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997. It therefore takes on its ordinary meaning. 36. The Macquarie Dictionary [2] defines the term 'licence' (as relevant here) as: 37. The ticket provides the qualifying employee with the formal permission to receive transport on the aeroplane and is, therefore, not intangible property. 38. As the airline ticket is neither tangible nor intangible property, the provision of the ticket is not a property benefit. 39. Therefore, the benefit provided by the employer does not fall within any of the provisions of Subdivision A of Divisions 2 to 11 and, as such, is a residual benefit per section 45. | Is the benefit exempt under subsection 47(7)?: 40. As the benefit is a residual benefit, consideration needs to be given to whether the benefit is an exempt residual benefit under subsection 47(7). 41. Subsection 47(7) states: | Is the employee's usual place of employment at a remote location in Australia or overseas, or on oil rigs or other installations at sea?: 42. This Ruling only applies to qualifying employees working in remote locations. A remote location is one that is not located in or adjacent to an 'eligible urban area' as defined in section 140. According to paragraph 140(1)(a), an 'eligible urban area' is an urban centre that is either: 43. According to paragraph 140(1)(b), an area is 'adjacent to an eligible urban area' if it is either: Are the employees provided with accommodation, at or near the worksite on working days by the employer, an associate of the employer or an arranger? 44. The qualifying employees are provided with residential accommodation during their working days, at or near their usual place of employment, by the employer. Do the employees, on a regular basis, work for a number of days followed by a number of days off, and return to their usual place of residence on their days off? 45. The qualifying employees work for a number of days and have a number of days off. On completion of their working days, they travel from that usual place of employment to their usual place of residence and, on completion of the days off, return from their place of residence back to that usual place of employment. These rosters are normal cyclical FIFO arrangements. Is the employee regularly provided with transport between their usual place of residence and place of employment? 46. The employer provides their qualifying employee with transport on a regular basis between their usual place of residence and place of employment. A whole or part of this is administered by SPA Pty Ltd. Having regard to the location of the 2 places, is it unreasonable to expect the employee to travel to and from work on a daily basis? 47. It would be unreasonable to expect the qualifying employee to travel on a daily basis on work days between the qualifying employee's usual place of employment and their usual place of residence, having regard to the location of these places. 48. The requirements of subsection 47(7) are met and the provision of the FIFO travel is therefore exempt from fringe benefits tax. © AUSTRALIAN TAXATION OFFICE FOR THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute this material as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).


Appendix: Is there a benefit?: 19. The provision of the travel, under a salary sacrifice arrangement, will give rise to a 'benefit' as defined in subsection 136(1). 20. The benefit will be a fringe benefit where it meets the definition of 'fringe benefit' as defined in subsection 136(1). 21. The definition of fringe benefit in subsection 136(1) excludes at paragraph (g) a benefit that is an exempt benefit in relation to the year of tax. 22. For the purposes of this Ruling, the relevant exemption is the exemption provided under subsection 47(7) for a residual benefit that consists of the provision of FIFO transport. | Is the benefit a residual benefit?: 23. As section 47 provides for exempt residual benefits, it is necessary to consider whether the benefit is a residual benefit. 24. Section 45 provides that a benefit will be a residual benefit if it is not a benefit by virtue of a provision of Subdivision A of Divisions 2 to 11 (inclusive). Divisions 2 to 4 and 6 to 10 are not relevant to this scheme. Division 5 and Division 11 may be relevant to this scheme. | Expense payment benefits: 25. With respect to Division 5, section 20 states that an expense payment benefit will arise where a person (in this section referred to as the provider): 26. Under this arrangement, the travel supplier issues an invoice to the employer for payment, rather than to the qualifying employee incurring the expense directly. 27. SPA Pty Ltd then acts on behalf of the employer, in drawing funds held on behalf of the employer and arranging payment of the invoice. 28. The cost of the flight is paid for by the employer through use of the salary sacrificed funds and the employer is discharging their own obligation. The employer is, therefore, not discharging an obligation of another person to pay a third person, nor providing a reimbursement to another person in respect of expenditure incurred by that person. 29. The benefit is, therefore, not an expense payment benefit under section 20. | Property benefits: 30. Division 11 applies to property fringe benefits. Section 40 states: 31. Subsection 136(1) provides the following definitions relevant to property benefits: 32. The term 'goods' is not defined in the FBTAA and therefore takes its ordinary meaning. The Macquarie Dictionary [1] defines the term 'goods' relevantly as: 33. The airline ticket does not meet the definition of goods and is therefore not tangible property. 34. Paragraph (e) of the definition of 'intangible property' in subsection 136(1) of the FBTAA relevantly excludes leases or licences in respect of real property or tangible property. 35. 'Licence' is not defined in the FBTAA, the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (ITAA 1936) or the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997. It therefore takes on its ordinary meaning. 36. The Macquarie Dictionary [2] defines the term 'licence' (as relevant here) as: 37. The ticket provides the qualifying employee with the formal permission to receive transport on the aeroplane and is, therefore, not intangible property. 38. As the airline ticket is neither tangible nor intangible property, the provision of the ticket is not a property benefit. 39. Therefore, the benefit provided by the employer does not fall within any of the provisions of Subdivision A of Divisions 2 to 11 and, as such, is a residual benefit per section 45. | Is the benefit exempt under subsection 47(7)?: 40. As the benefit is a residual benefit, consideration needs to be given to whether the benefit is an exempt residual benefit under subsection 47(7). 41. Subsection 47(7) states: | Is the employee's usual place of employment at a remote location in Australia or overseas, or on oil rigs or other installations at sea?: 42. This Ruling only applies to qualifying employees working in remote locations. A remote location is one that is not located in or adjacent to an 'eligible urban area' as defined in section 140. According to paragraph 140(1)(a), an 'eligible urban area' is an urban centre that is either: 43. According to paragraph 140(1)(b), an area is 'adjacent to an eligible urban area' if it is either: Are the employees provided with accommodation, at or near the worksite on working days by the employer, an associate of the employer or an arranger? 44. The qualifying employees are provided with residential accommodation during their working days, at or near their usual place of employment, by the employer. Do the employees, on a regular basis, work for a number of days followed by a number of days off, and return to their usual place of residence on their days off? 45. The qualifying employees work for a number of days and have a number of days off. On completion of their working days, they travel from that usual place of employment to their usual place of residence and, on completion of the days off, return from their place of residence back to that usual place of employment. These rosters are normal cyclical FIFO arrangements. Is the employee regularly provided with transport between their usual place of residence and place of employment? 46. The employer provides their qualifying employee with transport on a regular basis between their usual place of residence and place of employment. A whole or part of this is administered by SPA Pty Ltd. Having regard to the location of the 2 places, is it unreasonable to expect the employee to travel to and from work on a daily basis? 47. It would be unreasonable to expect the qualifying employee to travel on a daily basis on work days between the qualifying employee's usual place of employment and their usual place of residence, having regard to the location of these places. 48. The requirements of subsection 47(7) are met and the provision of the FIFO travel is therefore exempt from fringe benefits tax. © AUSTRALIAN TAXATION OFFICE FOR THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute this material as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).


What this Ruling is about | If this Ruling applies to you, and you correctly rely on it, we will apply the law to you in the way set out in this Ruling. That is, you will not pay any more tax or penalties or interest in respect of the matters covered by this Ruling. | (a) makes a payment in discharge, in whole or in part, of an obligation of another person (in this section referred to as the recipient ) to pay an amount to a third person in respect of expenditure incurred by the recipient; or | (b) reimburses another person (in this section also referred to as the recipient ), in whole or in part, in respect of an amount of expenditure incurred by the recipient. | the making of the payment referred to in paragraph (a), or the reimbursement referred to in paragraph (b), shall be taken to constitute the provision of a benefit by the provider to the recipient. | Where, at a particular time, a person (in this section referred to as the provider ) provides property to another person (in this section referred to as the recipient ), the provision of the property shall be taken to constitute a benefit provided by the provider to the recipient at that time. | property benefit means a benefit referred to in section 40, but does not include a benefit that is a benefit by virtue of a provision of Subdivision A or Divisions 2 to 10 (inclusive) of Part III. | 1. [plural] possessions, especially movable effects or personal belongings. | 2. [plural] articles of trade; wares; merchandise, especially that which is transported by land. | 1. formal permission or leave to do or not to do something. | 2. formal permission from a constituted authority to do something, as to carry on some business or profession, to be released from jail for part of one's sentence under specific restrictions, etc. | 3. a certificate of such permission; an official permit.


Related rulings: CR 2021/12
Legislative references: FBTAA 1986 Div 2 Subdiv A FBTAA 1986 Div 3 Subdiv A FBTAA 1986 Div 4 Subdiv A FBTAA 1986 Div 5 Subdiv A FBTAA 1986 Div 6 Subdiv A FBTAA 1986 Div 7 Subdiv A FBTAA 1986 Div 8 Subdiv A FBTAA 1986 Div 9 Subdiv A FBTAA 1986 Div 10 Subdiv A FBTAA 1986 Div 11 Subdiv A FBTAA 1986 20 FBTAA 1986 40 FBTAA 1986 45 FBTAA 1986 47 FBTAA 1986 47(7) FBTAA 1986 136(1) FBTAA 1986 140 FBTAA 1986 140(1)(a) FBTAA 1986 140(1)(b) ITAA 1936 Sch 2 Pt I ITAA 1936 Sch 2 Pt II ITAA 1997
Other references: Pan Macmillan Australia (2025), The Macquarie Dictionary online http://www.macquariedictionary.com.au/