Taxation Determination TD 1999/9







1. Concern has been expressed that, because of the way the market operates, a debenture may be considered not to have been issued outside Australia for the purposes of paragraph 128F(1)(c), even though the relevant debenture is executed and delivered outside Australia. This could occur, for example, where a document in connection with the issue of a debenture, other than the debenture itself, has been signed in Australia. | 2. The term 'issue' was discussed in Taxation Ruling IT 2652 in relation to the withholding tax exemption previously available for debentures under the old section 128F, which operated prior to 1 January 1996. That Ruling, which dealt with debentures issued outside Australia by a non-resident agent, pointed out that the term 'issue' was not defined for the purposes of the withholding tax provisions and, therefore, its ordinary meaning must be adopted. This is still the position. | 3. In discussing an agreement to issue debentures in Levy v. Abercorris Slate and Slab Company (1887) 37 Ch 260, Chitty J of the Chancery Division stated at 264: | ' "issued" is not a technical term, it is a mercantile term well understood; "issue" here means the delivery over by the company to the person who has the charge". | 4. The ordinary meaning of the word 'issue' according to The Macquarie Dictionary is 'to put out: deliver for use, sale, etc.; put into circulation'. To put out or deliver debentures to subscribers in an offshore market, is to 'issue' the debentures for the purposes of paragraph 128F(1)(c) irrespective of where supporting documentation may have been signed. | 5. Accordingly, provided the relevant debenture is, in the case of a bearer debenture, executed and delivered outside Australia and, in the case of a registered debenture, executed and delivered outside Australia and registered on a register outside Australia, a company is taken to have issued a debenture for the purpose of paragraph 128F(1)(c). | 6. It should be noted that this Determination will no longer have application if the changes to section 128F proposed in Taxation Laws Amendment Bill (No 2) 1999 become law. | Commissioner of Taxation 12 May 1999 | Previously released in draft form as TD 1999/D2


Related rulings: TD 1999/8 TD 1999/10 TD 1999/11 TD 1999/12 TD 1999/13 TD 1999/14 TD 1999/15 TD 1999/16 TD 1999/17 TD 1999/18 TD 1999/19 TD 1999/20 TD 1999/21 TD 1999/22 TD 1999/23 TD 1999/24 TD 1999/25 TD 1999/26 IT 2652
Legislative references: 128F 128F(1)(c)
Case references: Levy v. Abercorris Slate and Slab Company 1887 37 Ch 260