Class Ruling CR 2015/111
Date of effect: 16 December 2015

What this ruling is about: 1. This Ruling sets out the Commissioner's opinion on the way in which the relevant provisions identified below apply to the defined class of entities, who take part in the scheme to which this Ruling relates. Relevant provision(s) 2. The relevant provisions dealt with in this ruling are: Class of entities 3. The class of entities to which this Ruling applies is employers who are clients of McMillan Shakespeare Limited and its subsidiaries that provide their employees with a smart-card enabling them to travel on buses only between their place of residence and place of employment. Qualifications 4. The class of entities defined in this Ruling may rely on its contents provided the scheme actually carried out is carried out in accordance with the scheme described in paragraphs 7 to 23 of this Ruling. 5. If the scheme actually carried out is materially different from the scheme that is described in this Ruling, then:

Class of entities or scheme: 3. The class of entities to which this Ruling applies is employers who are clients of McMillan Shakespeare Limited and its subsidiaries that provide their employees with a smart-card enabling them to travel on buses only between their place of residence and place of employment. | Qualifications: 4. The class of entities defined in this Ruling may rely on its contents provided the scheme actually carried out is carried out in accordance with the scheme described in paragraphs 7 to 23 of this Ruling. 5. If the scheme actually carried out is materially different from the scheme that is described in this Ruling, then: 6. This Ruling applies from the 16 December 2015. However, this Ruling will not apply to taxpayers to the extent that it conflicts with the terms of a settlement of a dispute agreed to before the date of issue of this Ruling (see paragraphs 75 and 76 of Taxation Ruling TR 2006/10). 7. The following description of the scheme is based on information provided by the applicant. 8. McMillan Shakespeare Limited enters into contractual arrangements with state providers of bus travel (State Providers) as agent on behalf of the employers. 9. The State Providers will provide the employers with travel smart-cards which act as an electronic ticketing system. The credits or tickets are purchased by the employer from the State Providers who administer the smart-card system. 10. In order to ride on the bus, the employee uses the smart-card which is loaned to them from their employer as part of a salary sacrifice arrangement. 11. The employee must sign a declaration which states that the card will only be used for work-related transport, comprising transport between their place of residence and place of employment, as defined in the FBTAA. The smart-card's use cannot be extended to travel that is private in nature that does not meet the definition in the FBTAA. 12. The smart-card can only be operated by the employee to provide transport for that employee between their place of employment and place of residence. Nobody other than the employee is entitled to use the card. 13. The smart-card will only be used for transport by bus. The use of the card cannot be extended to other modes of public transport, such as trams, trains and ferries, even if the card is compatible with their ticketing systems. 14. The smart-card issued by the State Providers remains the property of the employer. Upon cessation of employment, the card must be returned to the employer and any credits/tickets are removed from the card. Any unused credits are paid out to the employee as gross salary, with PAYG withholding to be deducted. 15. On the employer's behalf, McMillan Shakespeare Limited implements a range of safeguards, ensuring that each smart-card is used only by the employee, and only for travel between home and work. 16. Travel undertaken by employees is to be reconciled annually by McMillan Shakespeare Limited, on behalf of the employer. 17. The smart-card will have an identification number linked to the employer which identifies the employee. 18. Random audits are undertaken to determine whether employees are complying with the company policy. If there are any discrepancies, the employee is monitored and the card may be revoked if the employer determines the smart-card is not being used correctly. 19. In the event that unauthorised use of the card is identified, the employee is required to repay the employer for the benefit they received. 20. The benefit is only available to employees who enter into the arrangement. No reimbursement will be given to employees who obtain the smart-card through directly liaising with the travel provider. 21. Each employee will only be issued with a single active smart-card. 22. In the event that a smart-card is lost, stolen, or there is evidence of misuse, the transport provider will cancel the card at the request of McMillan Shakespeare Limited, on behalf of the employer. 23. The smart-card is suspended if an employee is on a leave of absence, and is reinstated once their leave of absence finishes and they need to travel to and from their places of residence and employment. 24. The employee's use of the travel smart-card provided by the employer is a residual benefit as per section 45 of the FBTAA. 25. The residual benefit that arises from the employee's use of the travel smart-card is an exempt benefit under subsection 47(6) of the FBTAA if the private use of the travel smart-card is for bus travel between the employee's place of residence and work. Commissioner of Taxation 16 December 2015 26. Subsection 47(6) of the FBTAA outlines the conditions that must be met for a residual benefit to qualify for an exemption from Fringe Benefits Tax (FBT), stating: the benefit is an exempt benefit in relation to the year of tax. 27. Section 45 of the FBTAA provides that a benefit will be a residual benefit if it is not a benefit by virtue of a provision of Subdivision A of Divisions 2 to 11 (inclusive). Divisions 3 to 10 are not relevant to this scheme. Division 2 and Division 11 may be relevant to this scheme. 28. Division 2 applies to car fringe benefits. The definition of a car in subsection 136(1) of the FBTAA refers to section 995-1 of the ITAA 1997. Under section 995-1 the ITAA 1997, a car is defined as a 'motor vehicle (except a motor cycle or similar vehicle) designed to carry a load of less than 1 tonne and fewer than 9 passengers.' Therefore, a bus does not fall within the definition of 'car' and so is not covered by Division 2. 29. Division 11 applies to property fringe benefits. Section 40 states that 'where, at a particular time, a person (in this section referred to as the provider) provides property to another person (in this section referred to as the recipient), the provision of the property shall be taken to constitute a benefit provided by the provider to the recipient at that time.' 30. The definition of 'provide' in subsection 136(1) of the FBTAA is: 31. Division 11 deals with property fringe benefits, and with respect to the definition of 'provide' in relation to property, there has been no disposal of the legal ownership or beneficial interest of the bus. Therefore, the bus has not been provided by the employer, for the purposes of Division 11. 32. Therefore, the benefit provided by the employer, does not fall within any of the provisions of Subdivision A of Divisions 2 to 11 and as such is a residual benefit as per section 45. 33. The residual benefit must meet two conditions in order to satisfy paragraph 47(6)(a). 34. As discussed in paragraph 31 of this ruling, the bus was not provided to the employee. ATO Interpretive Decision ATO ID 2001/313 outlines the Commissioner's view on the employee's travel on a bus. It is considered to be the use of a bus as the smart-card provided by the employer allows the employee to use the bus. This satisfies one of the conditions in paragraph 47(6)(a) of the FBTAA. 35. The definition of a motor vehicle in subsection 136(1) of the FBTAA refers to section 995-1 of the ITAA 1997. Under section 995-1 of the ITAA 1997, a motor vehicle 'means any motor-powered road vehicle (including a 4 wheel drive vehicle).' Therefore, a bus is a motor vehicle. 36. Paragraph 47(6)(a) contextualises the residual benefit as being provided 'in respect of the employment of a current employee'. Under the declaration signed by the employee, the smart-card must be returned to the employer when their employment ends. As such, this satisfies the other condition the residual benefit must meet in order to satisfy paragraph 47(6)(a). 37. To satisfy paragraph 47(6)(aa), the motor vehicle must not be a taxi let on hire to the provider, or a car (other than a panel van, utility truck or other road vehicle designed to carry a load of less than 1 tonne and not designed to carry passengers). As a bus is neither a taxi let on hire to the provider or a car paragraph 47(6)(aa) is satisfied. 38. Paragraph 47(6)(b) requires that in order for the residual benefit to be exempted, any 'private use' must be limited to 'work-related travel' and that any other private use is minor, infrequent and irregular. Subsection 136(1) of the FBTAA defines both 'private use' and 'work-related travel': 39. The private use permitted under the declaration is between the employee's places of residence and employment only. This satisfies the definition of work-related travel provided in subsection 136(1) of the FBTAA. Thus, subparagraph 47(6)(b)(i) of the FBTAA is also satisfied. 40. Subparagraph 47(6)(b)(ii) of the FBTAA requires that other private use of the motor vehicle by the employee or an associate of the employee be minor, infrequent and irregular. Under the proposed arrangement, other private use of the motor vehicle that is not work-related, or use by anyone other than the employee, is expressly prohibited, whether infrequent, minor or irregular. 41. During the FBT year and at the time the employee is provided with the residual benefit, there is no private use of the bus other than for work-related travel. As such, this satisfies subparagraph 47(6)(b)(ii) of the FBTAA. 42. The residual benefit, consists of the use of the smart-card for work-related travel on the bus, satisfies subsection 47(6) of the FBTAA and is therefore exempt. 43. The following is a detailed contents list for this Ruling: © AUSTRALIAN TAXATION OFFICE FOR THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute this material as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products). Not previously issued as a draft

Ruling: 24. The employee's use of the travel smart-card provided by the employer is a residual benefit as per section 45 of the FBTAA. 25. The residual benefit that arises from the employee's use of the travel smart-card is an exempt benefit under subsection 47(6) of the FBTAA if the private use of the travel smart-card is for bus travel between the employee's place of residence and work. Commissioner of Taxation 16 December 2015


Appendix: 26. Subsection 47(6) of the FBTAA outlines the conditions that must be met for a residual benefit to qualify for an exemption from Fringe Benefits Tax (FBT), stating: the benefit is an exempt benefit in relation to the year of tax. 27. Section 45 of the FBTAA provides that a benefit will be a residual benefit if it is not a benefit by virtue of a provision of Subdivision A of Divisions 2 to 11 (inclusive). Divisions 3 to 10 are not relevant to this scheme. Division 2 and Division 11 may be relevant to this scheme. 28. Division 2 applies to car fringe benefits. The definition of a car in subsection 136(1) of the FBTAA refers to section 995-1 of the ITAA 1997. Under section 995-1 the ITAA 1997, a car is defined as a 'motor vehicle (except a motor cycle or similar vehicle) designed to carry a load of less than 1 tonne and fewer than 9 passengers.' Therefore, a bus does not fall within the definition of 'car' and so is not covered by Division 2. 29. Division 11 applies to property fringe benefits. Section 40 states that 'where, at a particular time, a person (in this section referred to as the provider) provides property to another person (in this section referred to as the recipient), the provision of the property shall be taken to constitute a benefit provided by the provider to the recipient at that time.' 30. The definition of 'provide' in subsection 136(1) of the FBTAA is: 31. Division 11 deals with property fringe benefits, and with respect to the definition of 'provide' in relation to property, there has been no disposal of the legal ownership or beneficial interest of the bus. Therefore, the bus has not been provided by the employer, for the purposes of Division 11. 32. Therefore, the benefit provided by the employer, does not fall within any of the provisions of Subdivision A of Divisions 2 to 11 and as such is a residual benefit as per section 45. 33. The residual benefit must meet two conditions in order to satisfy paragraph 47(6)(a). 34. As discussed in paragraph 31 of this ruling, the bus was not provided to the employee. ATO Interpretive Decision ATO ID 2001/313 outlines the Commissioner's view on the employee's travel on a bus. It is considered to be the use of a bus as the smart-card provided by the employer allows the employee to use the bus. This satisfies one of the conditions in paragraph 47(6)(a) of the FBTAA. 35. The definition of a motor vehicle in subsection 136(1) of the FBTAA refers to section 995-1 of the ITAA 1997. Under section 995-1 of the ITAA 1997, a motor vehicle 'means any motor-powered road vehicle (including a 4 wheel drive vehicle).' Therefore, a bus is a motor vehicle. 36. Paragraph 47(6)(a) contextualises the residual benefit as being provided 'in respect of the employment of a current employee'. Under the declaration signed by the employee, the smart-card must be returned to the employer when their employment ends. As such, this satisfies the other condition the residual benefit must meet in order to satisfy paragraph 47(6)(a). 37. To satisfy paragraph 47(6)(aa), the motor vehicle must not be a taxi let on hire to the provider, or a car (other than a panel van, utility truck or other road vehicle designed to carry a load of less than 1 tonne and not designed to carry passengers). As a bus is neither a taxi let on hire to the provider or a car paragraph 47(6)(aa) is satisfied. 38. Paragraph 47(6)(b) requires that in order for the residual benefit to be exempted, any 'private use' must be limited to 'work-related travel' and that any other private use is minor, infrequent and irregular. Subsection 136(1) of the FBTAA defines both 'private use' and 'work-related travel': 39. The private use permitted under the declaration is between the employee's places of residence and employment only. This satisfies the definition of work-related travel provided in subsection 136(1) of the FBTAA. Thus, subparagraph 47(6)(b)(i) of the FBTAA is also satisfied. 40. Subparagraph 47(6)(b)(ii) of the FBTAA requires that other private use of the motor vehicle by the employee or an associate of the employee be minor, infrequent and irregular. Under the proposed arrangement, other private use of the motor vehicle that is not work-related, or use by anyone other than the employee, is expressly prohibited, whether infrequent, minor or irregular. 41. During the FBT year and at the time the employee is provided with the residual benefit, there is no private use of the bus other than for work-related travel. As such, this satisfies subparagraph 47(6)(b)(ii) of the FBTAA. 42. The residual benefit, consists of the use of the smart-card for work-related travel on the bus, satisfies subsection 47(6) of the FBTAA and is therefore exempt.


What this Ruling is about | NOT LEGALLY BINDING SECTION: | A public ruling is an expression of the Commissioner's opinion about the way in which a relevant provision applies, or would apply, to entities generally or to a class of entities in relation to a particular scheme or a class of schemes. | If you rely on this ruling, the Commissioner must apply the law to you in the way set out in the ruling (unless the Commissioner is satisfied that the ruling is incorrect and disadvantages you, in which case the law may be applied to you in a way that is more favourable for you - provided the Commissioner is not prevented from doing so by a time limit imposed by the law). You will be protected from having to pay any underpaid tax, penalty or interest in respect of the matters covered by this ruling if it turns out that it does not correctly state how the relevant provision applies to you. | private use, in relation to a motor vehicle, in relation to an employee or an associate of an employee, means any use of the motor vehicle by the employee or associate, as the case may be, that is not exclusively in the course of producing assessable income of the employee. | Appendix 2 - Detailed contents list


Related rulings: TR 2006/10
Legislative references: FBTAA 1986 FBTAA 1986 45 FBTAA 1986 47(6) FBTAA 1986 47(6)(a) FBTAA 1986 47(6)(aa) FBTAA 1986 47(6)(b) FBTAA 1986 47(6)(b)(i) FBTAA 1986 47(6)(b)(ii) FBTAA 1986 136(1) ITAA 1997 ITAA 1997 995-1 TAA 1953
Other references: ATO ID 2001/313