Class Ruling CR 2008/62
Date of effect: 30 June 2008

What this ruling is about: 1. This Ruling sets out the Commissioner's opinion on the way in which the relevant provisions identified below apply to the defined class of entities, who take part in the scheme to which this Ruling relates. Relevant provision(s) 2. The relevant provision dealt with in this Ruling is: All legislative references in this Ruling are to the ITAA 1936 unless otherwise indicated. Class of entities 3. The class of entities to which this Ruling applies are persons who participate in the Global Employee Share Plans (the plans) while they are working in Australia for BHP Billiton Limited or BHP Billiton Plc (collectively referred to as BHP Billiton) or a subsidiary of either company. In this Ruling, a person belonging to this class of entities is referred to as a participant. Qualifications 4. The Commissioner makes this ruling based on the precise scheme identified in this Ruling. 5. The class of entities defined in this Ruling may rely on its contents provided the scheme actually carried out is carried out in accordance with the scheme described in paragraphs 12 to 26 of this Ruling. 6. If the scheme actually carried out is materially different from the scheme that is described in this Ruling, then: 7. This work is copyright. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968 , no part may be reproduced by any process without prior written permission from the Commonwealth. Requests and inquiries concerning reproduction and rights should be addressed to:

Class of entities or scheme: 3. The class of entities to which this Ruling applies are persons who participate in the Global Employee Share Plans (the plans) while they are working in Australia for BHP Billiton Limited or BHP Billiton Plc (collectively referred to as BHP Billiton) or a subsidiary of either company. In this Ruling, a person belonging to this class of entities is referred to as a participant. | Qualifications: 4. The Commissioner makes this ruling based on the precise scheme identified in this Ruling. 5. The class of entities defined in this Ruling may rely on its contents provided the scheme actually carried out is carried out in accordance with the scheme described in paragraphs 12 to 26 of this Ruling. 6. If the scheme actually carried out is materially different from the scheme that is described in this Ruling, then: 7. This work is copyright. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968 , no part may be reproduced by any process without prior written permission from the Commonwealth. Requests and inquiries concerning reproduction and rights should be addressed to: 8. This Ruling applies from the income year ended 30 June 2008. However, the Ruling does not apply to taxpayers to the extent that it conflicts with the terms of settlement of a dispute agreed to before the date of issue of the Ruling. Furthermore, the Ruling only applies to the extent that: 9. If this Ruling is inconsistent with a later public or private ruling, the relevant class of entities may rely on either ruling which applies to them (item 1 of subsection 357-75(1) of Schedule 1 to the Taxation Administration Act 1953 (TAA)). 10. If this Ruling is inconsistent with an earlier private ruling, the private ruling is taken not to have been made if, when the Ruling is made, the following two conditions are met: 11. If the above two conditions do not apply, the relevant class of entities may rely on either ruling which applies to them (item 3 of subsection 357-75(1) of Schedule 1 to the TAA). 12. The following description of the scheme is based on information provided by the applicant. 13. These documents, or relevant parts of them, as the case may be, form part of and are to be read with this description. The relevant documents or parts of documents incorporated into this description of the scheme are: 14. BHP Billiton operates a number of employee share schemes including the plans. 15. The purpose of the plans is to allow employees of BHP Billiton and subsidiaries (the BHP Billiton group) the opportunity to: 16. Under the plans, BHP Billiton issues invitations to employees of the BHP Billiton group, to apply to participate in one of the plans. 17. Invitations are upon terms and subject to restrictions that BHP Billiton determines. 18. An employee is only eligible to apply to participate in a plan if they satisfy criteria that BHP Billiton determine. 19. BHP Billiton may accept or reject any application at its discretion. 20. Where BHP Billiton accepts an eligible employee's application to participate in a plan, the employee becomes a participant in the plan. 21. Under the plan a participant makes after tax salary contributions to a plan administrator appointed by BHP Billiton. | Acquired shares: 22. The plan administrator uses a participant's contributions to purchase shares, which are referred to as acquired shares. 23. The plan administrator pays any brokerage fees incurred on the acquisition of these shares out of funds provided by BHP Billiton. 24. Shares acquired by the plan administrator are notionally allocated to a participant and held by the plan administrator for the benefit of the participant. 25. A participant may, at any time, instruct the plan administrator to sell any or all of their acquired shares. | Matched shares: 26. Where a participant holds acquired shares for a specified period (the holding period) and they remain employed by the BHP Billiton group, they are entitled to be awarded an additional share for each acquired share held, for no further consideration. Each additional share is referred to as a matched share. 27. Where under a plan a participant makes contributions to a plan administrator and they are allocated an acquired share, the acquired share is considered to be acquired by the participant in respect of the participant's employment, for the purposes of subsection 139C(1). Commissioner of Taxation 22 October 2008 28. Subsection 139C(1), subject to subsections (3), (4) and (5), provides that an employee will acquire a share under an employee share scheme if: | Acquisition of a share: 29. Section 139G provides that an employee will acquire a share in several circumstances, including by acquiring a beneficial interest in the share. Under a plan, a participant will acquire a beneficial interest in a share when it is allocated to them by the plan administrator 30. Therefore, a participant will acquire an acquired share within the meaning of section 139G at this time. | The employment connection test: 31. Whilst subsection 139C(1) has not been considered by the courts, the Commissioner considers the employment connection test contained therein to be essentially the same as that contained within the definition of 'fringe benefit' in section 136(1) of the Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986 (FBTAA) and also within section 26(e), which have both been considered by the courts on numerous occasions. 32. In J & G Knowles & Associates Pty Ltd v. Federal Commissioner of Taxation (2000) 96 FCR 402; 2000 ATC 4151; (2000) 44 ATR 22, the court considered the application of fringe benefits tax in relation to interest free loans provided by a unit trust to directors of a corporate trustee, where the directors were also beneficiaries of the trust. At issue was whether such loans were provided in respect of the employment of an employee, for the purposes of the FBTAA. In considering this matter the court noted: 33. In Payne v. Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1996) 66 FCR 299; 96 ATC 4407; (1996) 32 ATR 516, the court considered the application of section 26(e) in relation to frequent flyer points granted to Mr Payne. At issue was whether the points granted to Mr Payne constituted a benefit allowed, given or granted to him in respect of, or for, or in relation directly or indirectly to, any employment or services he rendered. In his judgement, Foster J, when discussing another case dealing with section 26(e), stated: 34. These two cases establish that for something to be acquired in respect of employment: 35. BHP Billiton operates a number of share plans including the plans. Invitations to participate in the plans can only be made to employees of the BHP Billiton group. The plans are therefore operated exclusively for the benefit of employees of the BHP Billiton group. 36. The overall purpose of the plans is to provide an outcome that allows ongoing employees of the BHP Billiton group to receive additional shares (matched shares) for no further consideration where they acquire and hold acquired shares for a specified period. 37. By design, the plans contain a number of elements that must be satisfied before this outcome can be achieved. 38. In order for a participant to receive a matched share: 39. Whilst an acquired share is purchased by the plan administrator from funds provided by the participant, the funding and subsequent acquisition of an acquired share are fundamental elements of the operation of a plan. Without an acquired share, a participant cannot benefit from the operation of the plan. 40. The overall purpose of the plans is to provide benefits to participants who can only be employees of the BHP Billiton group. The benefit for a participant being the opportunity to acquire shares in BHP Billiton under one of the plans. As such, the plans operate to provide a form of incentive or reward for employment services provided by participants who are ongoing employees. 41. Having regard to the above, the Commissioner considers that the acquisition by a participant of an acquired share under one of the plans, being an integral and necessary element of the plan: 42. Therefore, when a participant acquires an acquired share under the plan, the share will be acquired by the participant in respect of, or for, or in relation directly or indirectly to, any employment of the participant. 43. The following is a detailed contents list for this Ruling: Not previously issued as a draft

Ruling: 27. Where under a plan a participant makes contributions to a plan administrator and they are allocated an acquired share, the acquired share is considered to be acquired by the participant in respect of the participant's employment, for the purposes of subsection 139C(1). Commissioner of Taxation 22 October 2008


Appendix: 28. Subsection 139C(1), subject to subsections (3), (4) and (5), provides that an employee will acquire a share under an employee share scheme if: | Acquisition of a share: 29. Section 139G provides that an employee will acquire a share in several circumstances, including by acquiring a beneficial interest in the share. Under a plan, a participant will acquire a beneficial interest in a share when it is allocated to them by the plan administrator 30. Therefore, a participant will acquire an acquired share within the meaning of section 139G at this time. | The employment connection test: 31. Whilst subsection 139C(1) has not been considered by the courts, the Commissioner considers the employment connection test contained therein to be essentially the same as that contained within the definition of 'fringe benefit' in section 136(1) of the Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986 (FBTAA) and also within section 26(e), which have both been considered by the courts on numerous occasions. 32. In J & G Knowles & Associates Pty Ltd v. Federal Commissioner of Taxation (2000) 96 FCR 402; 2000 ATC 4151; (2000) 44 ATR 22, the court considered the application of fringe benefits tax in relation to interest free loans provided by a unit trust to directors of a corporate trustee, where the directors were also beneficiaries of the trust. At issue was whether such loans were provided in respect of the employment of an employee, for the purposes of the FBTAA. In considering this matter the court noted: 33. In Payne v. Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1996) 66 FCR 299; 96 ATC 4407; (1996) 32 ATR 516, the court considered the application of section 26(e) in relation to frequent flyer points granted to Mr Payne. At issue was whether the points granted to Mr Payne constituted a benefit allowed, given or granted to him in respect of, or for, or in relation directly or indirectly to, any employment or services he rendered. In his judgement, Foster J, when discussing another case dealing with section 26(e), stated: 34. These two cases establish that for something to be acquired in respect of employment: 35. BHP Billiton operates a number of share plans including the plans. Invitations to participate in the plans can only be made to employees of the BHP Billiton group. The plans are therefore operated exclusively for the benefit of employees of the BHP Billiton group. 36. The overall purpose of the plans is to provide an outcome that allows ongoing employees of the BHP Billiton group to receive additional shares (matched shares) for no further consideration where they acquire and hold acquired shares for a specified period. 37. By design, the plans contain a number of elements that must be satisfied before this outcome can be achieved. 38. In order for a participant to receive a matched share: 39. Whilst an acquired share is purchased by the plan administrator from funds provided by the participant, the funding and subsequent acquisition of an acquired share are fundamental elements of the operation of a plan. Without an acquired share, a participant cannot benefit from the operation of the plan. 40. The overall purpose of the plans is to provide benefits to participants who can only be employees of the BHP Billiton group. The benefit for a participant being the opportunity to acquire shares in BHP Billiton under one of the plans. As such, the plans operate to provide a form of incentive or reward for employment services provided by participants who are ongoing employees. 41. Having regard to the above, the Commissioner considers that the acquisition by a participant of an acquired share under one of the plans, being an integral and necessary element of the plan: 42. Therefore, when a participant acquires an acquired share under the plan, the share will be acquired by the participant in respect of, or for, or in relation directly or indirectly to, any employment of the participant.


What this Ruling is about | NOT LEGALLY BINDING SECTION: | A public ruling is an expression of the Commissioner's opinion about the way in which a relevant provision applies, or would apply, to entities generally or to a class of entities in relation to a particular scheme or a class of schemes. | If you rely on this ruling, we must apply the law to you in the way set out in the ruling (or in a way that is more favourable for you if we are satisfied that the ruling is incorrect and disadvantages you, and we are not prevented from doing so by a time limit imposed by the law). You will be protected from having to pay any underpaid tax, penalty or interest in respect of the matters covered by this ruling if it turns out that it does not correctly state how the relevant provision applies to you. | Whatever question is to be asked, it must be remembered that what must be established is whether there is a sufficient or material, rather than a causal connection or relationship between the benefit and the employment. | In my view, the judgments in Smith illustrate rather than depart from the view of the section established in Dixon, Hayes and Scott insofar as those cases established, in my opinion, that, for a benefit, etc, to be caught by the section, there needed to be a role played by the employer in the giving, etc, of the benefit. | In Smith's case there was a clear and positive role played by the employer, which is totally lacking in the present case. | Appendix 2 - Detailed contents list


Legislative references: ITAA 1936 ITAA 1936 26(e) ITAA 1936 139C ITAA 1936 139C(1) ITAA 1936 139C(3) ITAA 1936 139C(4) ITAA 1936 139C(5) ITAA 1936 139G FBTAA 1986 FBTAA 1986 136(1) Copyright Act 1968 TAA 1953 TAA 1953 Sch 1 357-75(1)
Case references: J & G Knowles & Associates Pty Ltd v. Federal Commissioner of Taxation (2000) 96 FCR 402 2000 ATC 4151 (2000) 44 ATR 22
Subject references: employee share schemes & options