Class Ruling CR 2011/99
Date of effect: 1 April 2011

What this ruling is about: 1. This Ruling sets out the Commissioner's opinion on the way in which the relevant provision(s) identified below apply to the defined class of entities, who take part in the scheme to which this Ruling relates. Relevant provision(s) 2. The relevant provisions dealt with in this Ruling are: All references in this Ruling are to the FBTAA unless otherwise stated. Class of entities 3. The class of entities to which this Ruling applies is those employers that are either subject to the provisions of section 57A or section 65J that make use of a Wakefield - Citi Living Expenses Prepaid Charge Card facility. Qualifications 4. The Commissioner makes this Ruling based on the precise scheme identified in this Ruling. 5. The class of entities defined in this Ruling may rely on its contents provided the scheme actually carried out is carried out in accordance with the scheme described in paragraphs 9 to 27 of this Ruling. 6. If the scheme actually carried out is materially different from the scheme that is described in this Ruling, then: 7. This work is copyright. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968 , no part may be reproduced by any process without prior written permission from the Commonwealth. Requests and inquiries concerning reproduction and rights should be addressed to:

Class of entities or scheme: 3. The class of entities to which this Ruling applies is those employers that are either subject to the provisions of section 57A or section 65J that make use of a Wakefield - Citi Living Expenses Prepaid Charge Card facility. | Qualifications: 4. The Commissioner makes this Ruling based on the precise scheme identified in this Ruling. 5. The class of entities defined in this Ruling may rely on its contents provided the scheme actually carried out is carried out in accordance with the scheme described in paragraphs 9 to 27 of this Ruling. 6. If the scheme actually carried out is materially different from the scheme that is described in this Ruling, then: 7. This work is copyright. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968 , no part may be reproduced by any process without prior written permission from the Commonwealth. Requests and inquiries concerning reproduction and rights should be addressed to: 8. This Ruling applies from 1 April 2011. However, this Ruling will not apply to taxpayers to the extent that it conflicts with the terms of a settlement of a dispute agreed to before the date of issue of this Ruling (see paragraphs 75 and 76 of Taxation Ruling TR 2006/10). 9. The following description of the scheme is based on information provided by the applicant. The following documents, or relevant parts of them form part of and are to be read with the description: Note: certain information has been provided on a commercial-in-confidence basis and will not be disclosed or released under Freedom of Information legislation. 10. Under the scheme a series of agreements will be entered into between: | Referrer Agreement: 11. The Referrer Agreement sets out: 12. Under the terms of the agreement, Wakefield will provide services in relation to certain Citi charge Cards; including the Citi Living Expenses Prepaid Charge Card (the Card). The services provided by Wakefield include: 13. Also under the agreement, Citi will engage with Wakefield and receive instructions in relation to: | Agreement between Wakefield and the employer: 14. Under the terms of this agreement, a participating employer will appoint Wakefield to provide salary packaging services. The services provided by Wakefield will include: | Card Payer Agreement: 15. Under the terms of the Card Payer Agreement the employer agrees to provide each applicant with relevant information including a copy of the 'Application Form', an up-to-date 'Terms of Use and Product Disclosure Statement and a Financial Services Guide'. 16. Also under the terms of this agreement; Citi undertakes that where a prepaid card is cancelled or expires and the Cardholder is not issued with a new prepaid card, Citi will transfer any funds remaining to the credit of the Card to Wakefield for remittance to the employer to be paid to the Cardholder (employee) as salary subject to PAYG. | Agreement between Citi and the Cardholder (employee): 17. The 'Terms of Use and Product Disclosure Statement' operates as a contract between the Cardholder and Citi. It describes the rights and obligations between the Cardholder and Citi. 18. As set out in the statement: | Agreement between employer and employee: 19. The agreement between the employer and employee will be an effective salary sacrifice arrangement. [1] Under the terms of the agreement the employer will agree to discharge the employee's obligation to Citi that arises from the use of the Card. To do this, Wakefield on behalf of the employer will regularly transfer an agreed amount to Citi. 20. The amounts transferred to Citi by the employer will be held by Citi until they are used to discharge the Cardholder's obligation to Citi that arises from the use of the Card, or are returned to the employer. | The use of the Card: 21. A Cardholder will use the Card to pay a merchant who uses the relevant payment system. When the Card is used, Citi will authorise and settle the transaction with the merchant's bank. [2] 22. Each authorised payment will initiate a charge to the Cardholder's account. Under the terms and conditions of the agreement between the Cardholder and Citi, the Cardholder is liable to Citi for all amounts charged to the Cardholder's account including fees and charges. 23. Citi will discharge the Cardholder's obligation by applying the funds that relate to the Cardholder's account against the debt on the Card account. This will usually happen approximately two days after the obligation arises. 24. Citi will send Wakefield a transaction file on a periodic basis. The transaction file will list the transactions that have occurred. 25. At the end of the fringe benefits tax (FBT) year Wakefield will send a report listing all reportable fringe benefits tax transactions made using the Card to the employer and the account balance will either be returned to the employer or carried forward to the following FBT year. 26. If the balance is returned to the employer, it will be paid to the employee as salary subject to PAYG. Alternatively, if the balance is carried forward to the following FBT year, it is the employer's responsibility to reduce the amount that can be sacrificed in that year so as to ensure that the relevant threshold specified in either subsection 5B(1E) or subsection 65J(2B) is not exceeded. 27. On termination of employment the Card will be cancelled, any debts that arose prior to the date of cancellation will be discharged and any remaining balance will be returned to the employer to be paid to the employee as salary subject to PAYG. 28. The use of a Living Expenses Prepaid Charge Card will give rise to a 'benefit' as defined in subsection 136(1) at the time the Cardholder's obligation to Citi is discharged. 29. The benefit may be a 'tax-exempt body entertainment benefit' under section 38 if the employer in discharging the Cardholder's obligation to Citi incurs 'non-deductible exempt entertainment expenditure' as defined in subsection 136(1). 30. Where the employer in discharging the Cardholder's obligation to Citi does not incur 'non-deductible exempt entertainment expenditure', the benefit will be an 'expense payment benefit' under section 20. 31. Both an 'expense payment benefit' and a 'tax-exempt body entertainment benefit' will be an exempt benefit where the employer comes within section 57A. 32. However, a fringe benefits tax liability will arise if the value of the benefits provided to an individual employee exceed the relevant threshold specified in subsection 5B(1E). In determining whether the relevant threshold in subsection 5B(1E) is exceeded, an employer to which section 57A applies will disregard tax-exempt body entertainment benefits that: 33. An employer that is a rebatable employer under subsection 65J(1) will receive a rebate of 48% of the gross tax that would otherwise be payable on the expense payment benefits and tax-exempt body entertainment benefits that arise from the use of a Living Expenses Prepaid Charge Card provided the value of the benefits provided to the employee does not exceed the threshold specified in subsection 65J(2B). 34. In determining whether the relevant threshold in subsection 65J(2B) is exceeded, an employer that is a rebatable employer under subsection 65J(1) will disregard tax-exempt body entertainment benefits that: 35. The provision of benefits, using the Card facility, are not GST-creditable benefits in terms of section 149A and, therefore, are type 2 benefits for the purposes of calculating the employer's aggregate non-exempt amount under subsection 5B(1E) or amount of the rebate under subsections 65J(2A). Commissioner of Taxation 16 November 2011 | Type of benefit: 36. A Cardholder is able to use the Card to purchase goods or services from merchants who use the relevant payment system. 37. Under the terms and conditions of the agreement between the Cardholder and Citi, Citi will authorise and settle the Cardholder's Card transactions. In so doing, Citi will provide credit for the amount of the transaction. 38. Each authorised payment will initiate a charge to the Cardholder's account. Under the terms and conditions of the agreement between the employee and Citi, the employee is liable to Citi for all amounts charged to the Card account including fees and charges. 39. This liability will be discharged using some or all of the funds that Wakefield acting on behalf of the employer has deposited into a Citi bank account. 40. This discharge of the employee's obligation to Citi may be an expense payment benefit under paragraph 20(a). Paragraph 20(a) provides that where a person (the provider) makes a payment in discharge, in whole or in part, of an obligation of another person (the recipient) to pay an amount to a third person in respect of expenditure incurred by the recipient, the making of that payment gives rise to an 'expense payment benefit'. 41. Under the scheme the funds deposited on behalf of the employer by Wakefield will be used to discharge the employee's obligation to Citi. When this occurs, the elements of paragraph 20(a) will be satisfied as the employer (the provider) will make a payment to Citi (the third person) to discharge the employee's (the recipient) obligation to Citi. 42. However, as set out in paragraph 9 of Taxation Ruling TR 97/17 [3] the benefit will not be an 'expense payment benefit' if it comes within a specific provision such as 'tax-exempt body entertainment'. Paragraph 9 of TR 97/17 states: 43. This may include meal entertainment, recreational entertainment or entertainment facility leasing expenses. 44. A 'tax-exempt body entertainment benefit' will arise under section 38 where an entity that is wholly or partly exempt from income tax incurs 'non-deductible exempt entertainment expenditure'. In general terms, the expenditure will be 'non-deductible exempt entertainment expenditure' if section 32-5 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997) would prevent an income tax deduction from being claimed for the expenditure if the entity incurring the expense was subject to income tax. 45. The employer will be either a not-for-profit organisation or a government body. As both of these types of organisation are exempt from income tax, a 'tax-exempt body entertainment benefit' will arise if the employer in discharging the employee's obligation to Citi incurs 'non-deductible exempt entertainment expenditure'. | Employers subject to section 57A: 46. Section 57A provides that certain employers are generally exempt from fringe benefits tax. This section applies to employers that are an endorsed public benevolent institution, certain hospitals, an employer who provides public ambulance services (or services that support those service) where the employee is predominantly involved in connection with the provision of those services, or an endorsed health promotion charity. 47. The exemption in section 57A also applies to benefits provided to an employee of a government body where the duties of employment are exclusively performed in, or in connection with, certain hospitals. 48. However, these exemptions are subject to the capping provisions contained in section 5B. 49. Subsection 5B(1E) limits the exemption to $17,000 grossed-up taxable value per employee for employers who are public or non-profit hospitals, or who provide a public ambulance service. The $17,000 threshold also applies in respect of employees of a government body whose duties are exclusively performed in, or in connection with, a public or non-profit hospital. Such employers are liable for full FBT on the value of benefits provided in excess of this threshold. 50. All other employers to which section 57A applies will have a capping threshold of $30,000 grossed-up taxable value per employee. Such employers are liable for fringe benefits tax on the value of benefits provided in excess of this threshold. 51. Each employee's individual grossed-up non-exempt amount is determined by multiplying the employee's type 1 and type 2 individual base non-exempt amounts by the applicable gross-up rate. 52. However, any employer to which section 57A applies, will, irrespective of whether or not an employee's threshold amount has or has not been exceeded, not be liable for FBT on benefits: 53. This results from the operation of Step 1 of the method statement contained in subsection 5B(1L) which specifically disregards these benefits in calculating an employer's aggregate non-exempt amount. | Employers subject to section 65J: 54. Section 65J provides that certain non-government and non-profit organisations (rebatable employers) are entitled to have their FBT liability reduced by a rebate. The section does not apply to public benevolent institutions, nor to health promotion charities. 55. The rebate determined under subsection 65J(2A) is calculated as follows: 56. Rebatable employers have a capping threshold of $30,000 grossed-up taxable value per employee. If the total grossed-up taxable value of benefits is more than $30,000 a rebate cannot be claimed for the FBT liability on the excess amount (or on the aggregate non-rebatable amount). 57. The amount of gross tax is the amount of tax that would be payable on the fringe benefits taxable amount of the rebatable employer assuming that section 65J had not been enacted. 58. The rebatable employer's aggregate non-rebatable amount is calculated by aggregating the product of each employee's individual grossed-up non-rebatable amount less the $30,000 cap multiplied by the FBT rate. 59. Each employee's individual grossed-up non-rebatable amount is determined by multiplying the employee's type 1 and type 2 individual base non-rebatable amounts by the applicable gross-up rate. 60. However, any employer to which subsection 65J(1) applies, will, irrespective of whether or not an employee's threshold amount has or has not been exceeded, be able to claim the rebate on benefits: 61. This results from the operation of Step 1 of the method statement contained in subsection 65J(2H) which specifically disregards these benefits in calculating an employer's aggregate non-rebatable amount. | Will the benefit be a type 2 benefit?: 62. To determine whether a benefit provided under this scheme is a type 1 or type 2 benefit, it is necessary to ascertain whether the benefit is a GST-creditable benefit as defined in section 149A. 63. Taxation Ruling TR 2001/2 [4] points out that for the purposes of section 149A, to be a GST-creditable benefit, the provider of the benefit must be entitled to an input tax credit because of either: 64. The second point in paragraph 63 of this Ruling does not apply as subsection 149A(2) of the FBTAA only applies if the benefit was acquired or imported by the provider. In this case, there is a reimbursement for the purposes of the GST Act. Consequently, only the first point in paragraph 63 needs to be considered. 65. Paragraph 86 of Goods and Services Tax Ruling GSTR 2001/3 [5] states that Division 111 of the GST Act provides that an employer makes an acquisition that can be a creditable acquisition, subject to certain conditions, where: 66. Paragraph 89 of GSTR 2001/3 points out, amongst other things, that for Division 111 of the GST Act to apply, the arrangement between the employer and the employee needs to be for the reimbursement of a particular purchase or purchases incurred on the credit card. 67. The discharging of the Cardholder's debt obligation to Citi as described in the scheme involves no more than reimbursing the outstanding balance owing by the Cardholder at the particular time but without any reference to any specific purchase or purchases. Consistent with paragraph 89 of GSTR 2001/3, this is an input taxed financial supply that does not meet the requirements of Division 111 of the GST Act. 68. Therefore, the benefits provided under the scheme are not GST-creditable benefits for the purposes of section 149A. 69. As the relevant benefits in this case are not GST-creditable benefits they will always be treated as being 'type 2' benefits for: 70. The following is a detailed contents list for this Ruling: Not previously issued as a draft

Ruling: 28. The use of a Living Expenses Prepaid Charge Card will give rise to a 'benefit' as defined in subsection 136(1) at the time the Cardholder's obligation to Citi is discharged. 29. The benefit may be a 'tax-exempt body entertainment benefit' under section 38 if the employer in discharging the Cardholder's obligation to Citi incurs 'non-deductible exempt entertainment expenditure' as defined in subsection 136(1). 30. Where the employer in discharging the Cardholder's obligation to Citi does not incur 'non-deductible exempt entertainment expenditure', the benefit will be an 'expense payment benefit' under section 20. 31. Both an 'expense payment benefit' and a 'tax-exempt body entertainment benefit' will be an exempt benefit where the employer comes within section 57A. 32. However, a fringe benefits tax liability will arise if the value of the benefits provided to an individual employee exceed the relevant threshold specified in subsection 5B(1E). In determining whether the relevant threshold in subsection 5B(1E) is exceeded, an employer to which section 57A applies will disregard tax-exempt body entertainment benefits that: 33. An employer that is a rebatable employer under subsection 65J(1) will receive a rebate of 48% of the gross tax that would otherwise be payable on the expense payment benefits and tax-exempt body entertainment benefits that arise from the use of a Living Expenses Prepaid Charge Card provided the value of the benefits provided to the employee does not exceed the threshold specified in subsection 65J(2B). 34. In determining whether the relevant threshold in subsection 65J(2B) is exceeded, an employer that is a rebatable employer under subsection 65J(1) will disregard tax-exempt body entertainment benefits that: 35. The provision of benefits, using the Card facility, are not GST-creditable benefits in terms of section 149A and, therefore, are type 2 benefits for the purposes of calculating the employer's aggregate non-exempt amount under subsection 5B(1E) or amount of the rebate under subsections 65J(2A). Commissioner of Taxation 16 November 2011


Appendix: Type of benefit: 36. A Cardholder is able to use the Card to purchase goods or services from merchants who use the relevant payment system. 37. Under the terms and conditions of the agreement between the Cardholder and Citi, Citi will authorise and settle the Cardholder's Card transactions. In so doing, Citi will provide credit for the amount of the transaction. 38. Each authorised payment will initiate a charge to the Cardholder's account. Under the terms and conditions of the agreement between the employee and Citi, the employee is liable to Citi for all amounts charged to the Card account including fees and charges. 39. This liability will be discharged using some or all of the funds that Wakefield acting on behalf of the employer has deposited into a Citi bank account. 40. This discharge of the employee's obligation to Citi may be an expense payment benefit under paragraph 20(a). Paragraph 20(a) provides that where a person (the provider) makes a payment in discharge, in whole or in part, of an obligation of another person (the recipient) to pay an amount to a third person in respect of expenditure incurred by the recipient, the making of that payment gives rise to an 'expense payment benefit'. 41. Under the scheme the funds deposited on behalf of the employer by Wakefield will be used to discharge the employee's obligation to Citi. When this occurs, the elements of paragraph 20(a) will be satisfied as the employer (the provider) will make a payment to Citi (the third person) to discharge the employee's (the recipient) obligation to Citi. 42. However, as set out in paragraph 9 of Taxation Ruling TR 97/17 [3] the benefit will not be an 'expense payment benefit' if it comes within a specific provision such as 'tax-exempt body entertainment'. Paragraph 9 of TR 97/17 states: 43. This may include meal entertainment, recreational entertainment or entertainment facility leasing expenses. 44. A 'tax-exempt body entertainment benefit' will arise under section 38 where an entity that is wholly or partly exempt from income tax incurs 'non-deductible exempt entertainment expenditure'. In general terms, the expenditure will be 'non-deductible exempt entertainment expenditure' if section 32-5 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997) would prevent an income tax deduction from being claimed for the expenditure if the entity incurring the expense was subject to income tax. 45. The employer will be either a not-for-profit organisation or a government body. As both of these types of organisation are exempt from income tax, a 'tax-exempt body entertainment benefit' will arise if the employer in discharging the employee's obligation to Citi incurs 'non-deductible exempt entertainment expenditure'. | Employers subject to section 57A: 46. Section 57A provides that certain employers are generally exempt from fringe benefits tax. This section applies to employers that are an endorsed public benevolent institution, certain hospitals, an employer who provides public ambulance services (or services that support those service) where the employee is predominantly involved in connection with the provision of those services, or an endorsed health promotion charity. 47. The exemption in section 57A also applies to benefits provided to an employee of a government body where the duties of employment are exclusively performed in, or in connection with, certain hospitals. 48. However, these exemptions are subject to the capping provisions contained in section 5B. 49. Subsection 5B(1E) limits the exemption to $17,000 grossed-up taxable value per employee for employers who are public or non-profit hospitals, or who provide a public ambulance service. The $17,000 threshold also applies in respect of employees of a government body whose duties are exclusively performed in, or in connection with, a public or non-profit hospital. Such employers are liable for full FBT on the value of benefits provided in excess of this threshold. 50. All other employers to which section 57A applies will have a capping threshold of $30,000 grossed-up taxable value per employee. Such employers are liable for fringe benefits tax on the value of benefits provided in excess of this threshold. 51. Each employee's individual grossed-up non-exempt amount is determined by multiplying the employee's type 1 and type 2 individual base non-exempt amounts by the applicable gross-up rate. 52. However, any employer to which section 57A applies, will, irrespective of whether or not an employee's threshold amount has or has not been exceeded, not be liable for FBT on benefits: 53. This results from the operation of Step 1 of the method statement contained in subsection 5B(1L) which specifically disregards these benefits in calculating an employer's aggregate non-exempt amount. | Employers subject to section 65J: 54. Section 65J provides that certain non-government and non-profit organisations (rebatable employers) are entitled to have their FBT liability reduced by a rebate. The section does not apply to public benevolent institutions, nor to health promotion charities. 55. The rebate determined under subsection 65J(2A) is calculated as follows: 56. Rebatable employers have a capping threshold of $30,000 grossed-up taxable value per employee. If the total grossed-up taxable value of benefits is more than $30,000 a rebate cannot be claimed for the FBT liability on the excess amount (or on the aggregate non-rebatable amount). 57. The amount of gross tax is the amount of tax that would be payable on the fringe benefits taxable amount of the rebatable employer assuming that section 65J had not been enacted. 58. The rebatable employer's aggregate non-rebatable amount is calculated by aggregating the product of each employee's individual grossed-up non-rebatable amount less the $30,000 cap multiplied by the FBT rate. 59. Each employee's individual grossed-up non-rebatable amount is determined by multiplying the employee's type 1 and type 2 individual base non-rebatable amounts by the applicable gross-up rate. 60. However, any employer to which subsection 65J(1) applies, will, irrespective of whether or not an employee's threshold amount has or has not been exceeded, be able to claim the rebate on benefits: 61. This results from the operation of Step 1 of the method statement contained in subsection 65J(2H) which specifically disregards these benefits in calculating an employer's aggregate non-rebatable amount. | Will the benefit be a type 2 benefit?: 62. To determine whether a benefit provided under this scheme is a type 1 or type 2 benefit, it is necessary to ascertain whether the benefit is a GST-creditable benefit as defined in section 149A. 63. Taxation Ruling TR 2001/2 [4] points out that for the purposes of section 149A, to be a GST-creditable benefit, the provider of the benefit must be entitled to an input tax credit because of either: 64. The second point in paragraph 63 of this Ruling does not apply as subsection 149A(2) of the FBTAA only applies if the benefit was acquired or imported by the provider. In this case, there is a reimbursement for the purposes of the GST Act. Consequently, only the first point in paragraph 63 needs to be considered. 65. Paragraph 86 of Goods and Services Tax Ruling GSTR 2001/3 [5] states that Division 111 of the GST Act provides that an employer makes an acquisition that can be a creditable acquisition, subject to certain conditions, where: 66. Paragraph 89 of GSTR 2001/3 points out, amongst other things, that for Division 111 of the GST Act to apply, the arrangement between the employer and the employee needs to be for the reimbursement of a particular purchase or purchases incurred on the credit card. 67. The discharging of the Cardholder's debt obligation to Citi as described in the scheme involves no more than reimbursing the outstanding balance owing by the Cardholder at the particular time but without any reference to any specific purchase or purchases. Consistent with paragraph 89 of GSTR 2001/3, this is an input taxed financial supply that does not meet the requirements of Division 111 of the GST Act. 68. Therefore, the benefits provided under the scheme are not GST-creditable benefits for the purposes of section 149A. 69. As the relevant benefits in this case are not GST-creditable benefits they will always be treated as being 'type 2' benefits for:


What this Ruling is about | A public ruling is an expression of the Commissioner's opinion about the way in which a relevant provision applies, or would apply, to entities generally or to a class of entities in relation to a particular scheme or a class of schemes. | If you rely on this ruling, the Commissioner must apply the law to you in the way set out in the ruling (unless the Commissioner is satisfied that the ruling is incorrect and disadvantages you, in which case the law may be applied to you in a way that is more favourable for you - provided the Commissioner is not prevented from doing so by a time limit imposed by the law). You will be protected from having to pay any underpaid tax, penalty or interest in respect of the matters covered by this ruling if it turns out that it does not correctly state how the relevant provision applies to you. | Where a meal falls within a specific FBT provision (for example, as a board fringe benefit or a tax-exempt body entertainment fringe benefit) then, in the absence of an election made under Division 9A, the taxable value of the benefit is determined under that specific provision rather than the more general sections dealing with expense payment and property fringe benefits. If an employer elects to use one of the methods in Division 9A, then the taxation outcome for an individual meal is no longer relevant. | Appendix 2 - Detailed contents list


Related rulings: GSTR 2001/3 TR 97/17 TR 2001/2 TR 2001/10 TR 2006/10
Legislative references: ANTS(GST)A 1999 Div 111 FBTAA 1986 5B FBTAA 1986 5B(1E) FBTAA 1986 5B(1L) FBTAA 1986 20 FBTAA 1986 20(a) FBTAA 1986 37AD FBTAA 1986 38 FBTAA 1986 57A FBTAA 1986 65J(1) FBTAA 1986 65J(2A) FBTAA 1986 65J(2B) FBTAA 1986 65J(2H) FBTAA 1986 136(1) FBTAA 1986 149A FBTAA 1986 149A(2) ITAA 1997 32-5 TAA 1953 Copyright Act 1968
Subject references: entertainment expenses exempt benefits expense payment benefits FBT salary packaging FBT tax-exempt body fringe benefit fringe benefits tax health promotion charity public benevolent institution rebatable employer