Class Ruling CR 2016/46
Date of effect: 1 July 2015

What this ruling is about: 1. This Ruling sets out the Commissioner's opinion on the way in which the relevant provision(s) identified below apply to the defined class of entities, who take part in the scheme to which this Ruling relates. Relevant provisions 2. The relevant provisions dealt with in this Ruling are: All subsequent legislative references in this Ruling are to the ITAA 1936 unless otherwise stated. Class of entities 3. The class of entities to which this Ruling applies is the holders of ordinary shares in IPE Limited (IPE) who: In this Ruling, a person belonging to this class of entities is referred to as an 'IPE shareholder'. Qualifications 4. The Commissioner makes this Ruling based on the precise scheme identified in this Ruling. 5. The class of entities defined in this Ruling may rely on its contents provided the scheme actually carried out is carried out in accordance with the scheme described in paragraphs 8 to 25 of this Ruling. 6. If the scheme actually carried out is materially different from the scheme that is described in this Ruling, then:

Class of entities or scheme: 3. The class of entities to which this Ruling applies is the holders of ordinary shares in IPE Limited (IPE) who: In this Ruling, a person belonging to this class of entities is referred to as an 'IPE shareholder'. | Qualifications: 4. The Commissioner makes this Ruling based on the precise scheme identified in this Ruling. 5. The class of entities defined in this Ruling may rely on its contents provided the scheme actually carried out is carried out in accordance with the scheme described in paragraphs 8 to 25 of this Ruling. 6. If the scheme actually carried out is materially different from the scheme that is described in this Ruling, then: 7. This Ruling applies from 1 July 2015 to 30 June 2016. The Ruling continues to apply after 30 June 2016 to all entities within the specified class who entered into the specified scheme during the term of the Ruling. However, this Ruling will not apply to taxpayers to the extent that it conflicts with the terms of a settlement of a dispute agreed to before the date of issue of this Ruling (see paragraphs 75 and 76 of Taxation Ruling TR 2006/10). 8. The following description of the scheme is based on information provided by the applicant. The following documents, or relevant parts of them, form part of and are to be read with the description: Note: certain information has been provided on a commercial-in-confidence basis and will not be disclosed or released under Freedom of Information legislation. | Background: 9. IPE is an Australian resident company which has been listed on the Australian Securities Exchange (ASX) since November 2004. 10. IPE's principal activity is investing in private equity funds. 11. In October 2008 and June 2009, the Board of Directors announced that IPE would cease making new investments and would instead be progressively wound up. | Investing in private equity funds: 12. IPE keeps accounts and portfolio records of investments it makes in private equity funds such that it is able to identify all of its receipts from these investments as one of the following: | Status of the IPE portfolio - capital now excess to requirements: 13. In recent years, IPE had been able to pay dividends to its shareholders purely out of profits (being income and capital gains arising from its investments in private equity funds). It had used the returns of capital from the private equity funds to make further investments in other private equity funds to satisfy its commitments. 14. The position changed in 2014 with the completion of the investment phases of the funds in which IPE invests. With the undrawn commitments amount at a low level, IPE wants to deliver cash back to its shareholders. Part of that cash has the character of capital, in the sense that it flows from returns of capital invested in private equity funds, arising from the disposal of assets by those funds. In addition, IPE has in recent years received cash by way of returns of capital from a number of funds, as a result of companies which were the underlying investments of those funds re-financing themselves. The returns of capital received by IPE are surplus to its needs. | Returns of share capital: 15. IPE paid returns of share capital of 4.50 cents per share on 2 December 2015 (the First Capital Return) and 2.75 cents per share on 20 May 2016 (the Second Capital Return). These returns of capital were approved by IPE's shareholders and were paid equally to each shareholder listed on IPE's share register on the Record Date for each of these returns of share capital. 16. The Record Date of each return of share capital and the date when each return of share capital was paid by IPE (Payment Date) all occurred during the year ending 30 June 2016. 17. IPE debited the entire amount of each return of share capital against the company's share capital account. There was no change in either the number of IPE shares on issue or the proportionate interest of each shareholder in IPE. 18. The returns of share capital were sourced from IPE's existing net cash reserves. | Other matters: 19. The IPE Interim Report for the half year ended 31 December 2015 disclosed: 20. IPE consistently paid dividends in its early years, but the last dividend paid before the global financial crisis was in September 2008. IPE then retained its receipts to ensure that it would have sufficient cash to satisfy any of its investment commitments when called on, but was able to start paying dividends again in 2012. The table below shows the dividend history since the resumption in 2012: The dividend paid on 20 May 2016 was not franked due to an insufficient franking balance. 21. The returns of share capital do not reflect any change in the dividend policy of IPE. 22. On the Payment Date of the First Capital Return, IPE had 136,571,202 shares on issue. Subsequently, IPE initiated an on-market share buy-back. As a result, on the Payment Date of the Second Capital Return, it had 135,644,099 shares on issue. 23. Prior to the above returns of share capital, IPE had paid returns of share capital of 4 cents per share on 18 July 2014 (the subject of Class Ruling CR 2014/50), 3.5 cents per share on 16 September 2014 and 1.75 cents per share on 14 April 2015 (both the subject of Class Ruling CR 2015/42). 24. As at 30 April 2016, IPE had 1,886 shareholders on its share register. Approximately 1.26% of the IPE shares were held by non-residents. IPE's top 20 shareholders held approximately 63.15% of the issued shares. 25. IPE's share capital account (as defined in section 975-300 of the ITAA 1997) was not tainted within the meaning of Division 197 of the ITAA 1997. | Returns of share capital not dividends: 26. The returns of share capital paid to IPE shareholders are not dividends as defined in subsection 6(1). | The application of sections 45A, 45B and 45C: 27. The Commissioner will not make a determination under section 45A or section 45B that section 45C applies in relation to the returns of share capital received by IPE shareholders. | Capital gains tax (CGT) consequences: 28. CGT event G1 (section 104-135 of the ITAA 1997) happened when IPE paid each return of share capital to an IPE shareholder in respect of an IPE share that they owned at the relevant Record Date and continued to own at the relevant Payment Date. 29. CGT event C2 (section 104-25 of the ITAA 1997) happened when IPE paid each return of share capital to an IPE shareholder in respect of an IPE share that they owned at the relevant Record Date, but ceased to own before the relevant Payment Date. | Foreign resident shareholders: 30. An IPE shareholder who was a foreign resident just before CGT event G1 happened disregards any capital gain made when CGT event G1 happened if their IPE shares were not 'taxable Australian property' (section 855-10 of the ITAA 1997). 31. An IPE shareholder who was a foreign resident just before CGT event C2 happened disregards any capital gain or capital loss made when CGT event C2 happened if their right to receive each return of share capital was not 'taxable Australian property' (section 855-10 of the ITAA 1997). Commissioner of Taxation 29 June 2016 | Returns of share capital not dividends: 32. The term 'dividend' is defined in subsection 6(1) and includes any distribution made by a company to any of its shareholders. However, paragraph (d) of the definition of 'dividend' excludes a distribution from the meaning of 'dividend' if the amount of the distribution is debited against an amount standing to the credit of the company's share capital account. 33. The term 'share capital account' is defined in section 975-300 of the ITAA 1997 as an account which the company keeps of its share capital, or any other account created on or after 1 July 1998 where the first amount credited to the account was an amount of share capital. 34. Subsection 975-300(3) of the ITAA 1997 provides that an account is generally taken not to be a share capital account if it is tainted. IPE has confirmed that its share capital account was not tainted within the meaning of Division 197 of the ITAA 1997. 35. Each return of share capital was recorded as a debit to IPE's share capital account. As such, paragraph (d) of the definition of dividend in subsection 6(1) applies and neither distribution of share capital is a dividend as defined in subsection 6(1). | The application of sections 45A, 45B and 45C: 36. Sections 45A and 45B are two anti-avoidance provisions which, if they apply, allow the Commissioner to make a determination that section 45C applies to treat all or part of each return of share capital received by IPE shareholders as an unfranked dividend paid by the company out of profits. | Section 45A - streaming of dividends and capital benefits: 37. Section 45A applies where capital benefits are streamed to some shareholders (the Advantaged Shareholders), who would derive a greater benefit from the receipt of capital than other shareholders (the Disadvantaged Shareholders) and the Disadvantaged Shareholders receive, or are likely to receive, dividends. 38. A reference to the 'provision of a capital benefit to a shareholder in a company' is defined in paragraph 45A(3)(b) to include the distribution to the shareholder of share capital. 39. Although a 'capital benefit' was provided to IPE shareholders, the circumstances of the returns of share capital indicate that there was no streaming of capital benefits to some IPE shareholders and dividends to the other IPE shareholders. 40. Accordingly, the Commissioner will not make a determination under subsection 45A(2) that section 45C applies in relation to the whole, or a part, of the returns of share capital. | Section 45B - scheme to provide capital benefits: 41. Section 45B applies where certain capital payments are made to shareholders in substitution for dividends. In broad terms, subsection 45B(2) applies where: 42. Each return of share capital satisfies the conditions in paragraphs 45B(2)(a) and 45B(2)(b). However, having regard to the relevant circumstances of each scheme (comprising each distribution of share capital paid), it cannot be concluded that the scheme was entered into or carried out for a more than incidental purpose of enabling IPE shareholders to obtain a tax benefit. 43. Accordingly, the Commissioner will not make a determination under subsection 45B(3) that section 45C applies to the whole, or a part, of the payments of the returns of share capital. | CGT event G1 - section 104-135 of the ITAA 1997: 44. CGT event G1 happened when IPE made each return of share capital to an IPE shareholder in respect of a share that the shareholder owned at the relevant Record Date and continued to own at the relevant Payment Date (section 104-135 of the ITAA 1997). 45. An IPE shareholder made a capital gain if each return of share capital was more than the cost base of the shareholder's IPE share. The amount of the capital gain was equal to the excess (subsection 104-135(3) of the ITAA 1997). 46. If an IPE shareholder made a capital gain when CGT event G1 happened, the cost base and reduced cost base of the IPE share are reduced to nil. An IPE shareholder cannot have made a capital loss when CGT event G1 happened (Note 1 to subsection 104-135(3) of the ITAA 1997). 47. If each return of share capital, of 4.50 cents per share and 2.75 cents per share respectively, was equal to or less than the cost base of the IPE share at the time of payment, the cost base and reduced cost base of the share are reduced (but not below nil) by the amount of the payment (subsection 104-135(4) of the ITAA 1997). 48. A capital gain made when CGT event G1 happened is eligible to be treated as a discount capital gain under Division 115 of the ITAA 1997 provided that the IPE shareholder acquired the IPE share at least 12 months before the payment of the return of share capital (subsection 115-25(1) of the ITAA 1997) and the other conditions of Division 115 are satisfied. 49. An IPE shareholder who was a foreign resident or temporary resident must meet further conditions to be eligible to treat the capital gain as a discount capital gain under Division 115 of the ITAA 1997. | CGT event C2 - section 104-25 of the ITAA 1997: 50. CGT event C2 happened when each return of share capital was paid to an IPE shareholder that held the share at the relevant Record Date but no longer owned the share at the relevant Payment Date (section 104-25 of the ITAA 1997). 51. The right to receive each return of share capital was one of the rights inherent in an IPE share held at the Record Date. If, after the Record Date but before the Payment Date, an IPE shareholder ceased to own an IPE share in respect of which each return of share capital was payable, then the right to receive the return of share capital was retained by that shareholder and constituted a separate CGT asset. 52. The right to receive each return of share capital was ended by the right being discharged or satisfied when the payment was made. 53. An IPE shareholder made a capital gain if the capital proceeds from the ending of the right was more than the cost base of the right. The capital gain is equal to the amount of the excess. An IPE shareholder made a capital loss if the capital proceeds from the ending of the right was less than the reduced cost base of the right. The capital loss is equal to the amount of the difference (subsection 104-25(3) of the ITAA 1997). 54. In working out the capital gain or capital loss made when CGT event C2 happened, the capital proceeds were the amounts of share capital paid (4.50 cents per share and 2.75 cents per share respectively) (subsection 116-20(1) of the ITAA 1997). 55. The cost base of the IPE shareholder's right to receive each return of share capital is worked out under Division 110 of the ITAA 1997 (modified by Division 112 of the ITAA 1997). The cost base of the right does not include the cost base or reduced cost base of the share previously owned by an IPE shareholder that was applied in working out a capital gain or capital loss made when a CGT event happened to the share, for example, when the IPE shareholder disposed of the share after the relevant Record Date. 56. Therefore, if the entire cost base or reduced cost base of the IPE share was applied in working out a capital gain or capital loss when a CGT event happened to that share, then the right to receive each return of share capital was likely to have a cost base of nil. Therefore, the IPE shareholder generally made a capital gain equal to the amount of each return of share capital of 4.50 cents per share and 2.75 cents per share respectively. 57. As the right to receive the payment of each return of share capital was inherent in the IPE share during the time it was owned, the right is considered to have been acquired at the time when the corresponding share was acquired (section 109-5 of the ITAA 1997). 58. Accordingly, if the IPE share was acquired at least 12 months before the payment of each return of share capital, a capital gain made from the ending of the corresponding right satisfies the requirements of section 115-25 of the ITAA 1997. The capital gain may be eligible to be treated as a discount capital gain under Division 115 of the ITAA 1997 provided the other conditions of Division 115 of the ITAA 1997 are satisfied. 59. An IPE shareholder who was a foreign resident or temporary resident must meet further conditions to be eligible to treat any capital gain as a discount capital gain under Division 115 of the ITAA 1997. | Foreign resident shareholders: 60. Under subsection 855-10(1) of the ITAA 1997, an entity disregards a capital gain or capital loss made from a CGT event if: 61. The term 'taxable Australian property' is defined in the table in section 855-15 of the ITAA 1997. The table sets out five categories of CGT assets: 62. An IPE shareholder, being a foreign resident, or the trustee of a foreign resident trust for CGT purposes, cannot disregard a capital gain or capital loss made when CGT event G1 happened to their IPE share under subsection 855-10(1) if: 63. An IPE shareholder, being a foreign resident, or the trustee of a foreign resident trust for CGT purposes, cannot disregard a capital gain or capital loss made when CGT event C2 happened to their right to receive a return of share capital if: 64. The following is a detailed contents list for this Ruling: © AUSTRALIAN TAXATION OFFICE FOR THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute this material as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products). Not previously issued as a draft

Ruling: Returns of share capital not dividends: 26. The returns of share capital paid to IPE shareholders are not dividends as defined in subsection 6(1). | The application of sections 45A, 45B and 45C: 27. The Commissioner will not make a determination under section 45A or section 45B that section 45C applies in relation to the returns of share capital received by IPE shareholders. | Capital gains tax (CGT) consequences: 28. CGT event G1 (section 104-135 of the ITAA 1997) happened when IPE paid each return of share capital to an IPE shareholder in respect of an IPE share that they owned at the relevant Record Date and continued to own at the relevant Payment Date. 29. CGT event C2 (section 104-25 of the ITAA 1997) happened when IPE paid each return of share capital to an IPE shareholder in respect of an IPE share that they owned at the relevant Record Date, but ceased to own before the relevant Payment Date. | Foreign resident shareholders: 30. An IPE shareholder who was a foreign resident just before CGT event G1 happened disregards any capital gain made when CGT event G1 happened if their IPE shares were not 'taxable Australian property' (section 855-10 of the ITAA 1997). 31. An IPE shareholder who was a foreign resident just before CGT event C2 happened disregards any capital gain or capital loss made when CGT event C2 happened if their right to receive each return of share capital was not 'taxable Australian property' (section 855-10 of the ITAA 1997). Commissioner of Taxation 29 June 2016


Appendix: Returns of share capital not dividends: 32. The term 'dividend' is defined in subsection 6(1) and includes any distribution made by a company to any of its shareholders. However, paragraph (d) of the definition of 'dividend' excludes a distribution from the meaning of 'dividend' if the amount of the distribution is debited against an amount standing to the credit of the company's share capital account. 33. The term 'share capital account' is defined in section 975-300 of the ITAA 1997 as an account which the company keeps of its share capital, or any other account created on or after 1 July 1998 where the first amount credited to the account was an amount of share capital. 34. Subsection 975-300(3) of the ITAA 1997 provides that an account is generally taken not to be a share capital account if it is tainted. IPE has confirmed that its share capital account was not tainted within the meaning of Division 197 of the ITAA 1997. 35. Each return of share capital was recorded as a debit to IPE's share capital account. As such, paragraph (d) of the definition of dividend in subsection 6(1) applies and neither distribution of share capital is a dividend as defined in subsection 6(1). | The application of sections 45A, 45B and 45C: 36. Sections 45A and 45B are two anti-avoidance provisions which, if they apply, allow the Commissioner to make a determination that section 45C applies to treat all or part of each return of share capital received by IPE shareholders as an unfranked dividend paid by the company out of profits. | Section 45A - streaming of dividends and capital benefits: 37. Section 45A applies where capital benefits are streamed to some shareholders (the Advantaged Shareholders), who would derive a greater benefit from the receipt of capital than other shareholders (the Disadvantaged Shareholders) and the Disadvantaged Shareholders receive, or are likely to receive, dividends. 38. A reference to the 'provision of a capital benefit to a shareholder in a company' is defined in paragraph 45A(3)(b) to include the distribution to the shareholder of share capital. 39. Although a 'capital benefit' was provided to IPE shareholders, the circumstances of the returns of share capital indicate that there was no streaming of capital benefits to some IPE shareholders and dividends to the other IPE shareholders. 40. Accordingly, the Commissioner will not make a determination under subsection 45A(2) that section 45C applies in relation to the whole, or a part, of the returns of share capital. | Section 45B - scheme to provide capital benefits: 41. Section 45B applies where certain capital payments are made to shareholders in substitution for dividends. In broad terms, subsection 45B(2) applies where: 42. Each return of share capital satisfies the conditions in paragraphs 45B(2)(a) and 45B(2)(b). However, having regard to the relevant circumstances of each scheme (comprising each distribution of share capital paid), it cannot be concluded that the scheme was entered into or carried out for a more than incidental purpose of enabling IPE shareholders to obtain a tax benefit. 43. Accordingly, the Commissioner will not make a determination under subsection 45B(3) that section 45C applies to the whole, or a part, of the payments of the returns of share capital. | CGT event G1 - section 104-135 of the ITAA 1997: 44. CGT event G1 happened when IPE made each return of share capital to an IPE shareholder in respect of a share that the shareholder owned at the relevant Record Date and continued to own at the relevant Payment Date (section 104-135 of the ITAA 1997). 45. An IPE shareholder made a capital gain if each return of share capital was more than the cost base of the shareholder's IPE share. The amount of the capital gain was equal to the excess (subsection 104-135(3) of the ITAA 1997). 46. If an IPE shareholder made a capital gain when CGT event G1 happened, the cost base and reduced cost base of the IPE share are reduced to nil. An IPE shareholder cannot have made a capital loss when CGT event G1 happened (Note 1 to subsection 104-135(3) of the ITAA 1997). 47. If each return of share capital, of 4.50 cents per share and 2.75 cents per share respectively, was equal to or less than the cost base of the IPE share at the time of payment, the cost base and reduced cost base of the share are reduced (but not below nil) by the amount of the payment (subsection 104-135(4) of the ITAA 1997). 48. A capital gain made when CGT event G1 happened is eligible to be treated as a discount capital gain under Division 115 of the ITAA 1997 provided that the IPE shareholder acquired the IPE share at least 12 months before the payment of the return of share capital (subsection 115-25(1) of the ITAA 1997) and the other conditions of Division 115 are satisfied. 49. An IPE shareholder who was a foreign resident or temporary resident must meet further conditions to be eligible to treat the capital gain as a discount capital gain under Division 115 of the ITAA 1997. | CGT event C2 - section 104-25 of the ITAA 1997: 50. CGT event C2 happened when each return of share capital was paid to an IPE shareholder that held the share at the relevant Record Date but no longer owned the share at the relevant Payment Date (section 104-25 of the ITAA 1997). 51. The right to receive each return of share capital was one of the rights inherent in an IPE share held at the Record Date. If, after the Record Date but before the Payment Date, an IPE shareholder ceased to own an IPE share in respect of which each return of share capital was payable, then the right to receive the return of share capital was retained by that shareholder and constituted a separate CGT asset. 52. The right to receive each return of share capital was ended by the right being discharged or satisfied when the payment was made. 53. An IPE shareholder made a capital gain if the capital proceeds from the ending of the right was more than the cost base of the right. The capital gain is equal to the amount of the excess. An IPE shareholder made a capital loss if the capital proceeds from the ending of the right was less than the reduced cost base of the right. The capital loss is equal to the amount of the difference (subsection 104-25(3) of the ITAA 1997). 54. In working out the capital gain or capital loss made when CGT event C2 happened, the capital proceeds were the amounts of share capital paid (4.50 cents per share and 2.75 cents per share respectively) (subsection 116-20(1) of the ITAA 1997). 55. The cost base of the IPE shareholder's right to receive each return of share capital is worked out under Division 110 of the ITAA 1997 (modified by Division 112 of the ITAA 1997). The cost base of the right does not include the cost base or reduced cost base of the share previously owned by an IPE shareholder that was applied in working out a capital gain or capital loss made when a CGT event happened to the share, for example, when the IPE shareholder disposed of the share after the relevant Record Date. 56. Therefore, if the entire cost base or reduced cost base of the IPE share was applied in working out a capital gain or capital loss when a CGT event happened to that share, then the right to receive each return of share capital was likely to have a cost base of nil. Therefore, the IPE shareholder generally made a capital gain equal to the amount of each return of share capital of 4.50 cents per share and 2.75 cents per share respectively. 57. As the right to receive the payment of each return of share capital was inherent in the IPE share during the time it was owned, the right is considered to have been acquired at the time when the corresponding share was acquired (section 109-5 of the ITAA 1997). 58. Accordingly, if the IPE share was acquired at least 12 months before the payment of each return of share capital, a capital gain made from the ending of the corresponding right satisfies the requirements of section 115-25 of the ITAA 1997. The capital gain may be eligible to be treated as a discount capital gain under Division 115 of the ITAA 1997 provided the other conditions of Division 115 of the ITAA 1997 are satisfied. 59. An IPE shareholder who was a foreign resident or temporary resident must meet further conditions to be eligible to treat any capital gain as a discount capital gain under Division 115 of the ITAA 1997. | Foreign resident shareholders: 60. Under subsection 855-10(1) of the ITAA 1997, an entity disregards a capital gain or capital loss made from a CGT event if: 61. The term 'taxable Australian property' is defined in the table in section 855-15 of the ITAA 1997. The table sets out five categories of CGT assets: 62. An IPE shareholder, being a foreign resident, or the trustee of a foreign resident trust for CGT purposes, cannot disregard a capital gain or capital loss made when CGT event G1 happened to their IPE share under subsection 855-10(1) if: 63. An IPE shareholder, being a foreign resident, or the trustee of a foreign resident trust for CGT purposes, cannot disregard a capital gain or capital loss made when CGT event C2 happened to their right to receive a return of share capital if:


What this Ruling is about | NOT LEGALLY BINDING SECTION: | A public ruling is an expression of the Commissioner's opinion about the way in which a relevant provision applies, or would apply, to entities generally or to a class of entities in relation to a particular scheme or a class of schemes. | If you rely on this ruling, the Commissioner must apply the law to you in the way set out in the ruling (unless the Commissioner is satisfied that the ruling is incorrect and disadvantages you, in which case the law may be applied to you in a way that is more favourable for you - provided the Commissioner is not prevented from doing so by a time limit imposed by the law). You will be protected from having to pay any underpaid tax, penalty or interest in respect of the matters covered by this ruling if it turns out that it does not correctly state how the relevant provision applies to you. | taxable Australian real property; | an indirect Australian real property interest not covered by item 5; | a CGT asset used at any time in carrying on a business through a permanent establishment in Australia and which is not covered by item 1, 2, or 5; | an option or right to acquire a CGT asset covered by item 1, 2 or 3; and | a CGT asset that is covered by subsection 104-165(3) (choosing to disregard a gain or loss on ceasing to be an Australian resident). | Appendix 2 - Detailed contents list


Related rulings: TR 2006/10 CR 2014/50 CR 2015/42
Legislative references: ITAA 1936 ITAA 1936 6(1) ITAA 1936 45A ITAA 1936 45A(2) ITAA 1936 45A(3)(b) ITAA 1936 45B ITAA 1936 45B(2) ITAA 1936 45B(2)(a) ITAA 1936 45B(2)(b) ITAA 1936 45B(2)(c) ITAA 1936 45B(3) ITAA 1936 45C ITAA 1997 ITAA 1997 104-25 ITAA 1997 104-25(3) ITAA 1997 104-135 ITAA 1997 104-135(3) ITAA 1997 104-135(4) ITAA 1997 104-165(3) ITAA 1997 109-5 ITAA 1997 Div 110 ITAA 1997 Div 112 ITAA 1997 Div 115 ITAA 1997 115-25 ITAA 1997 115-25(1) ITAA 1997 116-20(1) ITAA 1997 Div 197 ITAA 1997 Div 230 ITAA 1997 855-10 ITAA 1997 855-10(1) ITAA 1997 855-15 ITAA 1997 975-300 ITAA 1997 975-300(3) ITAA 1997 977-50 ITAA 1997 995-1(1) TAA 1953