Class Ruling CR 2002/59
Date of effect: 1 July 2000

What this ruling is about: [Note: This is a consolidated version of this document. Refer to the Tax Office Legal Database (http://law.ato.gov.au) to check its currency and to view the details of all changes.]

Class of entities or scheme: 3. The class of persons to which this Ruling applies is persons receiving payments from the Remembrance, Responsibility and Future Foundation (the Foundation) because they personally suffered wrong, injury or property damage or because they are relatives or eligible heirs of persons who suffered wrong, injury or property damage. | Qualifications: 4. The Commissioner makes this Ruling based on the precise arrangement identified in this Ruling. 5. The class of persons defined in this Ruling may rely on its contents provided the arrangement actually carried out is carried out in accordance with the arrangement described below at paragraphs 9 to 10 in this Ruling. 6. If the arrangement actually carried out is materially different from the arrangement that is described in this ruling: 7. This work is copyright. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process without prior written permission from the Commonwealth. Requests and inquiries concerning reproduction and rights should be addressed to: 8. This Ruling applies from 1 July 2000. 9. The Remembrance, Responsibility and Future Foundation was set up by the German Parliament. The practical effect of the legislation is that payments, of up to 15,000 deutschmarks, will be made to applicants who were: An additional payment of 15,000 deutschmarks may be received by applicants who were victims of medical experiments. 10. Compensation may be awarded to either the individual who suffered the injury, wrong or property damage directly, or the surviving spouse, children, grandchildren or siblings of that individual. If no application is filed by these persons the heirs named in a will are entitled to apply. 11. Lump sum payments relating to personal injury or wrongs that are received by the person who suffered the wrong or injury, or their relatives, will not be liable for income tax or give rise to capital gains consequences. 12. Lump sum payments relating to personal injury or wrongs that are received after 1 July 2001 by eligible heirs of the person who suffered the wrong or injury will not give rise to capital gains consequences (see section 118-37(4) of the ITAA 1997). 13. Lump sum payments relating to property damage will not give rise to income or capital gains consequences where they are received by the original owner of the property. 14. Lump sum payments relating to property damage that are received after 1 July 2001 will not give rise to capital gains consequences in respect of that receipt where they are received by the relatives or eligible heirs of the person who owned the property (see section 118-37(4) of the ITAA 1997). 15. The payment of a single lump sum does not generally constitute income under ordinary concepts for the purposes of section 6-5 of the ITAA 1997. However, payment of the lump sum falls for consideration under subsection 6-10(4) which includes statutory income as assessable income. | Personal injury: 16. Receipt of the lump sum payment may give rise to a capital gain (statutory income) under CGT event C2 (see section 104-25 of the ITAA 1997) which concerns cancellation, surrender and similar endings. However, under paragraph 118-37(1)(b) of the ITAA 1997, a capital gain made from a CGT event which relates directly to compensation or damages received for any wrong, injury or illness suffered by a person or a relative of that person is disregarded. 'Relative' is defined under section 995-1 of the ITAA 1997 as : 17. In this case, the compensation received is for a wrong, namely for injustices inflicted on slave labourers and forced labourers and a large number of other human rights violations. The compensation is received directly by the person who suffered these wrongs, or that person's relative, and is therefore exempt under paragraph 118-37(1)(b). 18. However, paragraph 118-37(1)(b) does not extend to compensation received by persons who are eligible heirs but not relatives of the victim of the injury or wrong. These persons can be classed as receiving a payment for surrendering a right. However, subsection 118-37(4) of the ITAA 1997 expressly makes these payments exempt from CGT for the 2001-2002 and later income years. | Property damage: 19. Where the compensation is for property damage and the person receiving the compensation had an interest in the underlying property or an entity with such an interest, at the time of the loss or damage, any compensation receipt would have a direct and substantial link with the underlying property. The look-through approach in Taxation Ruling TR 95/35 applies to render any capital gain exempt because of the underlying property's pre-CGT status. 20. However, where a relative or heir of the original owner of the property receives a payment, capital gains consequences would arise as the relevant asset disposed of in this case is the right to be considered for compensation under the Remembrance, Responsibility and Future Foundation law rather than the underlying property. However, subsection 118-37(4) of the ITAA 1997 expressly makes these payments exempt from CGT for the 2001-2002 and later income years. 21. Below is a detailed contents list for this Class Ruling: Commissioner of Taxation 4 September 2002 Not previously released in draft form.

Ruling: 11. Lump sum payments relating to personal injury or wrongs that are received by the person who suffered the wrong or injury, or their relatives, will not be liable for income tax or give rise to capital gains consequences. 12. Lump sum payments relating to personal injury or wrongs that are received after 1 July 2001 by eligible heirs of the person who suffered the wrong or injury will not give rise to capital gains consequences (see section 118-37(4) of the ITAA 1997). 13. Lump sum payments relating to property damage will not give rise to income or capital gains consequences where they are received by the original owner of the property. 14. Lump sum payments relating to property damage that are received after 1 July 2001 will not give rise to capital gains consequences in respect of that receipt where they are received by the relatives or eligible heirs of the person who owned the property (see section 118-37(4) of the ITAA 1997). 15. The payment of a single lump sum does not generally constitute income under ordinary concepts for the purposes of section 6-5 of the ITAA 1997. However, payment of the lump sum falls for consideration under subsection 6-10(4) which includes statutory income as assessable income. | Personal injury: 16. Receipt of the lump sum payment may give rise to a capital gain (statutory income) under CGT event C2 (see section 104-25 of the ITAA 1997) which concerns cancellation, surrender and similar endings. However, under paragraph 118-37(1)(b) of the ITAA 1997, a capital gain made from a CGT event which relates directly to compensation or damages received for any wrong, injury or illness suffered by a person or a relative of that person is disregarded. 'Relative' is defined under section 995-1 of the ITAA 1997 as : 17. In this case, the compensation received is for a wrong, namely for injustices inflicted on slave labourers and forced labourers and a large number of other human rights violations. The compensation is received directly by the person who suffered these wrongs, or that person's relative, and is therefore exempt under paragraph 118-37(1)(b). 18. However, paragraph 118-37(1)(b) does not extend to compensation received by persons who are eligible heirs but not relatives of the victim of the injury or wrong. These persons can be classed as receiving a payment for surrendering a right. However, subsection 118-37(4) of the ITAA 1997 expressly makes these payments exempt from CGT for the 2001-2002 and later income years. | Property damage: 19. Where the compensation is for property damage and the person receiving the compensation had an interest in the underlying property or an entity with such an interest, at the time of the loss or damage, any compensation receipt would have a direct and substantial link with the underlying property. The look-through approach in Taxation Ruling TR 95/35 applies to render any capital gain exempt because of the underlying property's pre-CGT status. 20. However, where a relative or heir of the original owner of the property receives a payment, capital gains consequences would arise as the relevant asset disposed of in this case is the right to be considered for compensation under the Remembrance, Responsibility and Future Foundation law rather than the underlying property. However, subsection 118-37(4) of the ITAA 1997 expressly makes these payments exempt from CGT for the 2001-2002 and later income years. 21. Below is a detailed contents list for this Class Ruling: Commissioner of Taxation 4 September 2002 Not previously released in draft form.




What this Class Ruling is about | What this Class Ruling is about: 1. This Ruling sets out the Commissioner's opinion on the way in which the 'tax law(s)' identified below apply to the defined class of persons, who take part in the arrangement to which this Ruling relates. | Tax law(s): 2. The tax law dealt with in this Ruling is subsection 118-37(1) Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 ('ITAA 1997').


Related rulings: CR 2002/59A CR 2001/1 TR 92/1 TR 97/16 TR 95/35
Legislative references: ITAA 1997 995-1 ITAA 1997 6-5 ITAA 1997 6-10(4) ITAA 1997 118-37(1) ITAA 1997 118-37(1)(b) TAA 1953 Pt IVAAA Copyright Act 1968
Subject references: compensation assessable income