Class Ruling CR 2008/26
Date of effect: 28 December 2007

What this ruling is about: 1. This Ruling sets out the Commissioner's opinion on the way in which the relevant provision(s) identified below apply to the defined class of entities, who take part in the scheme to which this Ruling relates. Relevant provision(s) 2. The relevant provisions dealt with in this Ruling are: Class of entities 3. The class of entities to which this Ruling applies are the Australian resident investors (referred to as 'Holders') who subscribed for and were allotted St. George Bank Limited (St. George) Converting Preference Shares (CPS II) and who hold the CPS II on capital account. 4. The class of entities to which this Ruling applies does not extend to investors in the CPS II who acquired them otherwise than by initial subscription. 5. This Ruling does not deal with how the taxation law applies to Holders who hold the CPS II as trading stock or revenue assets. 6. This Ruling does not consider how the taxation law applies to Third Party Purchasers who acquire CPS II under a Transfer Notice or Early Transfer Notice. 7. This Ruling does not consider the tax implications of the exchange of CPS II by redemption, cancellation or buy-back. 8. This Ruling does not consider how the gross-up and tax offset rules in Division 207 of the ITAA 1997 apply to partnership or trustee Holders, or to indirect distributions to partners in a partnership, or beneficiaries or trustees of a trust. 9. This Ruling does not deal with how the taxation law applies to St. George in relation to the issue of CPS II. Qualifications 10. The Commissioner makes this Ruling based on the precise scheme identified in this Ruling. 11. The class of entities defined in this Ruling may rely on its contents provided the scheme actually carried out is carried out in accordance with the scheme described in paragraphs 19 to 58 of this Ruling. 12. If the scheme actually carried out is materially different from the scheme that is described in this Ruling, then: 13. This work is copyright. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968 , no part may be reproduced by any process without prior written permission from the Commonwealth. Requests and inquiries concerning reproduction and rights should be addressed to:

Class of entities or scheme: 3. The class of entities to which this Ruling applies are the Australian resident investors (referred to as 'Holders') who subscribed for and were allotted St. George Bank Limited (St. George) Converting Preference Shares (CPS II) and who hold the CPS II on capital account. 4. The class of entities to which this Ruling applies does not extend to investors in the CPS II who acquired them otherwise than by initial subscription. 5. This Ruling does not deal with how the taxation law applies to Holders who hold the CPS II as trading stock or revenue assets. 6. This Ruling does not consider how the taxation law applies to Third Party Purchasers who acquire CPS II under a Transfer Notice or Early Transfer Notice. 7. This Ruling does not consider the tax implications of the exchange of CPS II by redemption, cancellation or buy-back. 8. This Ruling does not consider how the gross-up and tax offset rules in Division 207 of the ITAA 1997 apply to partnership or trustee Holders, or to indirect distributions to partners in a partnership, or beneficiaries or trustees of a trust. 9. This Ruling does not deal with how the taxation law applies to St. George in relation to the issue of CPS II. | Qualifications: 10. The Commissioner makes this Ruling based on the precise scheme identified in this Ruling. 11. The class of entities defined in this Ruling may rely on its contents provided the scheme actually carried out is carried out in accordance with the scheme described in paragraphs 19 to 58 of this Ruling. 12. If the scheme actually carried out is materially different from the scheme that is described in this Ruling, then: 13. This work is copyright. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968 , no part may be reproduced by any process without prior written permission from the Commonwealth. Requests and inquiries concerning reproduction and rights should be addressed to: 14. This Ruling applies from 28 December 2007 to 30 June 2014. However, the Ruling continues to apply after 30 June 2014 to all entities within the specified class who entered into the specified scheme during the term of the Ruling. 15. The Ruling does not apply to taxpayers to the extent that it conflicts with the terms of settlement of a dispute agreed to before the date of issue of the Ruling. Furthermore, the Ruling only applies to the extent that: 16. If this Ruling is inconsistent with a later public or private ruling, the relevant class of entities may rely on either ruling which applies to them (item 1 of subsection 357-75(1) of Schedule 1 to the Taxation Administration Act 1953 (TAA)). 17. If this Ruling is inconsistent with an earlier private ruling, the private ruling is taken not to have been made if, when the Ruling is made, the following two conditions are met: 18. If the above two conditions do not apply, the relevant class of entities may rely on either ruling which applies to them (item 3 of subsection 357-75(1) of Schedule 1 to the TAA). 19. The following description of the scheme is based on information provided by the applicant. The following documents, or relevant parts of them, form part of and are to be read with the description: Note: certain information which relates to the affairs of St. George that is not in the public domain has been taken into account in determining the Commissioner's opinion set out in this Ruling (including the application of certain anti-avoidance provisions). This information has been provided on a commercial-in-confidence basis and will not be disclosed or released under the Freedom of Information legislation. 20. On 28 December 2007 St. George allotted 4 million CPS II. The CPS II were issued pursuant to the CPS II Prospectus. The CPS II were issued as fully paid at $100 face value for each CPS II. The issue raised $400 million. 21. The CPS II offer was available to: 22. There was no general public offer of CPS II. 23. The CPS II are listed on the Australian Securities Exchange (ASX) under the ASX code SGBPE. 24. St. George is subject to regulation by the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA). APRA requires Authorised Deposit-taking Institutions (ADI's) to maintain specified minimum ratios of total capital to risk-weighted assets. For this purpose, APRA issues Prudential Standards and Guidance Notes (Standards). 25. A bank's minimum capital requirements must be met at two levels. These two levels are known as Tier 1 and Tier 2 capital and have different requirements in terms of what instruments qualify as capital for APRA purposes under each of these tiers. 26. Tier 1 Capital is comprised of Fundamental Tier 1 Capital (such as ordinary shares) and Residual Tier 1 Capital (which includes Non-innovative Tier 1 Capital and Innovative Tier 1 Capital). 27. From 1 January 2008, there is a further restriction on the composition of the Residual Tier 1 Capital that will count as Tier 1 Capital. From this date, APRA Standards impose a maximum limit on the amount of Innovative Tier 1 Capital that will qualify for Tier 1 Capital status. 28. St. George is required to maintain a Tier 1 capital ratio of 7% and total capital ratio of 10%. The capital management policy of St. George targets a Tier 1 capital ratio in the range of 7.0% to 7.5%. 29. St. George redeemed its USD 250M Depositary Capital Securities in June 2007. Following the redemption, the St. George group Tier 1 capital adequacy ratio reduced to approximately 6.7% on a pro-forma basis to the ratios presented as at 31 March 2007. 30. The capital management initiatives to be undertaken by St. George in 2007-2008 including an institutional placement of St. George ordinary shares, and the issue of the CPS II should result in an increase in St. George's pro-forma Tier 1 capital ratio to approximately 7.7% and therefore within St. George's target Tier 1 capital range. 31. APRA has classified the CPS II as 'Non-innovative Residual Tier 1 Capital' pursuant to the Standards. 32. St. George advise that proceeds of the CPS II issue will be used to fund the ongoing growth of St. George's business. | CPS II Prospectus dated 19 November 2007 and Terms: 33. The CPS II are non-cumulative unsecured converting preference shares in the capital of St. George. The Holders of CPS II are entitled to receive a preferred non-cumulative floating rate dividend payable quarterly in arrears. | Dividend calculation: 34. The Holder of each CPS II is entitled to receive a dividend (Dividend) payable in arrears (starting 20 February 2008) calculated using the following formula: 35. St. George expects the Dividends to be fully franked. If the Dividend is unfranked or partially franked, the Dividend will be increased to compensate for the unfranked component, as determined by the calculation in clause 2.2 of the Terms. In addition, if the Australian corporate tax rate applicable to the franking account of St. George from which the Dividend will be franked differs from the Tax Rate, the Dividend will also be adjusted downwards or upwards accordingly. | Dividend payment conditions: 36. The payment of a Dividend or any optional dividend (Optional Dividend), is, among other things, subject to the following conditions: 37. The Dividends are non-cumulative and the Holders will not have any recourse in the event of non-payment. Accordingly, non-payment of all or part of a declared Dividend does not constitute an event of default by St. George, and Holders have no claim in respect of such non-payment. 38. The Holders of the CPS II are also not entitled to any interest on unpaid Dividends or Optional Dividends. 39. A Dividend or Optional Dividend is only payable to those persons registered as Holders on the Record Date for that Dividend or Optional Dividend respectively. | CPS II Conversion into Ordinary Shares: 40. St. George must Convert all CPS II on issue into Ordinary Shares on the Mandatory Conversion Date (refer to paragraph 43 of this Ruling for the meaning of Convert for the purposes of this Ruling). 41. The Mandatory Conversion Date will be the earlier of 20 August 2013 and the first Dividend Payment Date thereafter where both of the Mandatory Conversion Conditions are satisfied. 42. The Mandatory Conversion Conditions are: 43. The CPS II will Convert into Ordinary Shares by the variation of the rights and restrictions attaching to the CPS II, such that each CPS II will have all the rights attaching to one fully paid Ordinary Share and will rank equally with all other Ordinary Shares on issue. In addition, all other rights and restrictions conferred on the CPS II under the Terms will generally no longer have any effect. (Conversion and Converted have the corresponding meaning for the purposes of this Ruling.) 44. Each Holder may also be allotted an additional number of fully paid Ordinary Shares for each CPS II Converted in accordance with the relevant formula set out in clause 3.5 of the Terms, and as adjusted by clause 3.6 to clause 3.11 of the Terms. The formula incorporates a Conversion Discount of 1%. 45. The total market value of the Ordinary Shares held by a Holder immediately after the Conversion of the CPS II will be $101.01. 46. Clause 3.4 of the Terms states that Conversion does not constitute redemption, buy-back or cancellation of a CPS II or an issue, allotment or creation of a new share (other than any additional Ordinary Shares allotted). | Exchange Notice: 47. Subject to APRA's prior written approval, St. George must serve an Exchange Notice following the occurrence of an Acquisition Event. St. George may, subject also to APRA's prior written approval, serve an Exchange Notice following the occurrence of a Regulatory Event or a Tax Event. 48. An Exchange Notice gives St. George the right in respect of all (but not some only) of the CPS II to do any one or combination of the following: 49. St. George must serve an Exchange Notice, no later than the latest to occur of the following two events: 50. An Exchange Notice given by St. George is irrevocable. 51. Broadly, an Acquisition Event will occur when a takeover bid is made to acquire all or some St. George Ordinary Shares and the offer is or becomes unconditional, or where the Directors issue a statement recommending a scheme of arrangement. 52. A Regulatory Event will broadly occur as a result of any development in respect of securities laws of Australia generally that the Directors at their sole discretion determine to be unacceptable, or where the Directors determine that St. George is not or will not be entitled to treat all CPS II as eligible Tier 1 Capital. 53. A Tax Event will broadly occur as a result of any development in respect of taxation generally that has more than an insubstantial risk to: | Third Party Purchase: 54. St. George may elect that all CPS II on issue be acquired from Holders by one or more Third Party Purchaser(s) on a Relevant Date or an Exchange Date. The Third Party Purchaser(s) will be an entity nominated by St. George. St. George will make the election by serving a Transfer Notice or Early Transfer Notice to CPS II Holders within the time periods stipulated in Clauses 4.2 and 4.3 of the Terms. The Third Party Purchaser(s) will acquire the CPS II from the Holders for cash equal to the face value of the CPS II acquired. | General rights attaching to CPS II: 55. CPS II are not deposit liabilities of St. George. CPS II rank equally among themselves and are unsecured and subordinated to all depositors and creditors of St. George. Furthermore, CPS II rank equally with all other Equal Ranking Capital Securities in respect of the payment of Dividends that have been declared and in respect of the payment of dividends or other distributions that have been declared or are payable on all other Equal Ranking Capital Securities. CPS II rank equally with Equal Ranking Capital Securities in respect of a redemption of, return of capital on, cancellation of or acquisition of CPS II and payment of declared but unpaid Dividends on a winding up of St. George. 56. Equal Ranking Capital Securities means in respect of a dividend or distribution, any equity, hybrid or subordinated debt capital security (whether comprised of one or more instruments) issued by St. George or a member of the Group which ranks for the payment of dividend or distribution equally with CPS II. Capital Securities which rank equally for the payment of dividend or distribution include CPS SAINTS, and SPS. 57. Holders of CPS II will not be entitled to speak or vote at any general meeting of St. George except in limited circumstances. 58. This Ruling is made on the basis that: | Acquisition time of the CPS II: 59. Under section 109-10 of the ITAA 1997, each Holder acquired the CPS II on 28 December 2007, being the date the CPS II were issued to them. | CPS II cost base and reduced cost base: 60. Under subsections 110-25(2) and 110-55(2) of the ITAA 1997, the first element of the cost base and reduced cost base of each CPS II is $100. | Inclusion of Dividends in assessable income: 61. Holders of CPS II must include in their assessable income all Dividends received in respect of their CPS II under subparagraph 44(1)(a)(i) of the ITAA 1936, and an amount equal to the franking credit received on those Dividends under Division 207 of the ITAA 1997. | Entitlement to a tax offset: 62. Holders will be entitled to a tax offset equal to the franking credit received on the Dividends under subsection 207-20(2) of the ITAA 1997. | Anti-avoidance provisions - imputation benefits: 63. The Commissioner will not make a determination under paragraph 204-30(3)(c) of the ITAA 1997 to deny the whole, or any part, of the imputation benefits received in relation to the Dividends received by the Holders of the CPS II. 64. The Commissioner will not make a determination under paragraph 177EA(5)(b) of the ITAA 1936 to deny the whole, or any part, of the imputation benefits received in relation to the Dividends received by the Holders of the CPS II. | Gross-up and tax offset denied in certain circumstances: 65. Section 207-145 of the ITAA 1997 will not apply to the whole, or any part, of the Dividends received by the Holders of the CPS II. Accordingly, section 207-145 of the ITAA 1997 will not adjust the gross-up of the Holders' assessable income to exclude the franking credit, nor will it deny the tax offset to which the Holders would have otherwise been entitled. | Franking credit subject to the refundable tax offset rules: 66. Holders of CPS II who are entitled to a tax offset under Division 207 of the ITAA 1997, in respect of franking credits received, will also be subject to the refundable tax offset rules in Division 67 of the ITAA 1997, unless specifically excluded under section 67-25 of the ITAA 1997 and who are not excepted from the exclusion. Such excluded entities include certain trustees and corporate tax entities under subsections 67-25(1A) to (1D) of the ITAA 1997. | Conversion of each CPS II and allotment of additional St. George Ordinary Shares - capital gains tax (CGT) implications: 67. The Conversion of each CPS II into Ordinary Shares and the allotment of additional St George ordinary shares will not result in a CGT event for CGT purposes. 68. CGT event H2 in section 104-155 of the ITAA 1997 will not happen because on Conversion of each CPS II a cost base adjustment will be made to the CPS II as a consequence of the allotment of additional Ordinary shares. No other CGT event in Division 104 of the ITAA 1997 will happen because of the Conversion. | Allotment of additional St. George Ordinary Shares - dividend: 69. The allotment of additional St. George Ordinary Shares on Conversion of the CPS II will not be assessable as dividend income in the hands of the Holders. | Allotment of additional St George Ordinary Shares - ordinary income: 70. The value of any additional St George Ordinary Shares issued on Conversion of the CPS II shares will not be assessable as ordinary income in the hands of the Holders under subsection 6-5(1) of the ITAA 1997. | Cost base of the Ordinary Shares: 71. Either section 6BA of the ITAA 1936 or Subdivision 130-A of the ITAA 1997 will apply to apportion the first element of the cost base and reduced cost base of each CPS II over the Converted CPS II and any additional St. George Ordinary Shares allotted by St. George. | Date of acquisition of the additional Ordinary Shares: 72. Under subsection 130-20(3) of the ITAA 1997, the additional Ordinary Shares are taken to be acquired at the time the CPS II were originally acquired by the Holders, being 28 December 2007. Commissioner of Taxation 19 March 2008 | Acquisition time of the CPS II: 73. An equity interest that is issued or allotted by a company, is acquired when the contract is entered into or, if no contract exists, when the equity interests are issued or allotted: item 2 in the table in section 109-10 of the ITAA 1997. 74. Under the CPS II Prospectus, the CPS II offer opened on 27 November 2007 and had a staggered close in respect of the Securityholder Offer and Broker Firm Offer. St. George could withdraw or cancel the offer at any time before the issue date of 28 December 2007. The CPS II were issued on 28 December 2007. 75. For the purposes of item 2 in the table contained in section 109-10 of the ITAA 1997, the CPS II were acquired on 28 December 2007. | CPS II cost base and reduced cost base: 76. The first element of the cost base and reduced cost base includes the money paid, or required to be paid, in respect of acquiring a CGT asset: paragraph 110-25(2)(a) and subsection 110-55(2) of the ITAA 1997. 77. The Issue Price of the CPS II is $100 per CPS II. Accordingly, when CPS II are issued, the first element of the cost base and reduced cost base of each CPS II is $100. | Inclusion of Dividends in assessable income: 78. Subsection 44(1) of the ITAA 1936 provides, among other things, that the assessable income of a resident shareholder in a company includes dividends that are paid to the shareholder by the company out of profits derived by it from any source. 79. St. George advise the Dividends paid in respect of CPS II will be paid out of the retained profits of St. George. Accordingly, the Holders of CPS II must include the Dividend amount in their assessable income. | Inclusion of franking credits in assessable income: 80. St. George advises that it expects the Dividends paid in respect of the CPS II to be fully franked. Under the Australian imputation system, where a franked distribution is paid by an Australian resident company to a shareholder, the assessable income of the shareholder must also include the franking credit attached to the dividend under Division 207 of the ITAA 1997. The inclusion of both the dividend and the associated franking credit in a shareholder's assessable income is termed 'grossing-up' the dividend receipt. 81. Accordingly, the franking credits attached to the Dividends received by the Holders of CPS II must be included in their assessable income. | Entitlement to a tax offset: 82. In accordance with subsection 207-20(2) of the ITAA 1997, and with respect to the 'grossing-up' of the dividend receipt, the Holders are entitled to receive a tax offset equal to the value of the franking credit, which has been included in their assessable income. | Section 204-30: 83. Subdivision 204-D of the ITAA 1997 broadly enables the Commissioner to make a determination where distributions with attached imputation benefits are streamed to members of a corporate tax entity. 84. Section 204-30 of the ITAA 1997 prescribes the circumstances that are required to exist before the Commissioner may make such a determination. Section 204-30 applies where an entity 'streams' the payment of distributions in such a way that: 85. The existence of these conditions enables the Commissioner, under paragraph 204-30(3)(c) of the ITAA 1997, to make a determination that no imputation benefit is to arise in respect of the distributions made to those favoured members. 86. Streaming is not defined for the purposes of Subdivision 204-D of the ITAA 1997, however, it is understood to refer to a company selectively directing the flow of franked distributions to those members who can most benefit from the imputation credits: refer to paragraph 3.28 of the Explanatory Memorandum to the New Business Tax System (Imputation) Bill 2002. 87. St. George have indicated in the CPS II Prospectus that Dividends paid to the Holders are expected to be fully franked. Although the CPS II rank ahead of Ordinary Shares in respect of the payment of Dividends, St. George have advised that they have, and will continue, to pay fully franked dividends (to the extent of available franking credits in their franking account) to all of its shareholders, including shareholders of Ordinary Shares. There will be no change in St. George's dividend franking policy or dividend payout ratios on its share capital as a result of the issue of the CPS II. 88. As such, there is no evidence that the requisite element of streaming exists in relation to the franked distributions to be paid by St. George to Holders of CPS II. Accordingly, based on the information provided, the Commissioner will not make a determination under paragraph 204-30(3)(c) of the ITAA 1997 to deny imputation benefits to Holders of CPS II. | Section 177EA: 89. Section 177EA of the ITAA 1936 is a general anti-avoidance provision that applies where one of the purposes (other than an incidental purpose) of the scheme is to obtain an imputation benefit. Where these circumstances arise, subsection 177EA(5) of the ITAA 1936 enables the Commissioner to make a determination with the effect of either: 90. Pursuant to subsection 177EA(3) of the ITAA 1936, this provision applies if the following conditions are satisfied: 91. It is considered that the conditions in paragraphs 177EA(3)(a) to (d) of the ITAA 1936 are satisfied because: 92. Accordingly, the issue is whether having regard to the relevant circumstances of the scheme, it would be concluded that it was entered into or carried out for the purpose (which is not merely an incidental purpose) of enabling the relevant taxpayer to obtain an imputation benefit under the scheme. 93. Circumstances which are relevant in determining whether any person has the requisite purpose include, but are not limited to, the factors listed in subsection 177EA(17) of the ITAA 1936. The relevant circumstances listed encompass a range of circumstances which taken individually or collectively could indicate the requisite purpose. Due to the diverse nature of these circumstances, some may or may not be present at any one time in any one scheme. 94. St George advised that it redeemed its USD 250 million Depository Capital Securities in June 2007. Following the redemption, the St George group Tier 1 group capital adequacy ratio reduced to a ratio below what is required for APRA purposes. The issue of the CPS II is a capital raising transaction which St. George advised was undertaken to return St. George's Tier 1 Capital to within the range required by APRA. There is nothing in the Terms which would suggest it was entered into for the purpose (which is not merely an incidental purpose) of enabling the relevant taxpayer to obtain an imputation benefit under the scheme. 95. Based on the information provided, and having regard to the factors listed in subsection 177EA(17) of the ITAA 1936, the qualifications set out in this Ruling and the relevant circumstances of the scheme, it would not be reasonable to conclude that in entering into the scheme, St. George and/or the Holders of the CPS II demonstrate the objective purpose of securing imputation benefits for the Holders of the CPS II. To the extent that any imputation benefits are secured, those benefits are considered to be incidental to the more significant objective purposes of the raising of Tier 1 Capital by St. George to meet its capital adequacy requirements. 96. Accordingly, the Commissioner will not make a determination under paragraph 177EA(5)(b) of the ITAA 1936 that would deny the imputation benefits to the Holders of CPS II. | Gross-up and tax offset denied in certain circumstances: 97. Subdivision 207-F of the ITAA 1997 creates the appropriate adjustment to cancel the effect of the gross-up and tax offset rules where the entity concerned has manipulated the imputation system in a manner that is not permitted under the income tax law. 98. Section 207-145 of the ITAA 1997 provides the circumstances that must exist before this adjustment can occur. Pursuant to subsection 207-145(1) of the ITAA 1997 a 'manipulation of the imputation system' may occur where: 99. A person is a 'qualified person' for the purposes of Division 1A of former Part IIIAA of the ITAA 1936 if, generally speaking, they satisfy the holding period rule and the related payments rule (see former section 160APHO of the ITAA 1936). 100. The holding period rule applies where no related payment has, or will be made, in respect of the dividend, and requires the shares to have been continuously held at risk throughout the primary qualification period: former paragraph 160APHO(1)(a) of the ITAA 1936. 101. The related payments rule applies where the taxpayer or an associate, has made or will make, a related payment in respect of the dividend and requires the shares to have been continuously held at risk throughout the secondary qualification period: former subsection 160APHO(1) of the ITAA 1936 and former section 160APHN of the ITAA 1936. 102. The Holders of CPS II are qualified persons, provided that: 103. In determining whether a Holder is a 'qualified person' for the purposes of Division 1A of former Part IIIAA of the ITAA 1936, the Third Party Transfer facility contained in Clause 4 of the Terms, of itself, will not affect a Holder's risks of loss or opportunities for gain in respect of the CPS II. 104. The Commissioner has confirmed that he will not make a determination under paragraph 177EA(5)(b) of the ITAA 1936 or paragraph 204-30(3)(c) of the ITAA 1997 to deny the imputation benefits attached to Dividends paid by St. George to Holders of CPS II. 105. A distribution will be taken to be made as part of a dividend stripping operation, pursuant to section 207-155 of the ITAA 1997, where the distribution arose out of, or was made in the course of, a scheme or substantially similar arrangement that was in the nature of dividend stripping. The Transaction Documents provide no indication that the offering of CPS II and the associated payment of franked Dividends to the Holders in any way constitute a dividend stripping arrangement. As such, the dividend stripping provision will have no application to Holders of CPS II. 106. Accordingly, section 207-145 of the ITAA 1997 will not apply to deny imputation benefits to Holders of CPS II, as the requisite manipulation of the imputation system in respect of Dividends paid by St. George does not exist. | Franking credit subject to the refundable tax offset rules: 107. Holders of CPS II who are entitled to a tax offset under subsection 207-20(2) of the ITAA 1997 in respect of the grossing-up of their dividend receipts will also be subject to the refundable tax offset rules contained in Division 67 of the ITAA 1997, unless specifically excluded under subsections 67-25(1A) to (1D) of the ITAA 1997 and not being an exception to the excluded entities. 108. The refundable tax offset rules ensure that taxpayers are entitled to a refund, once their available tax offsets have been utilised to reduce any income tax liability to nil. 109. Accordingly, Holders of CPS II will be subject to the refundable tax offset rules unless they are listed as specifically excluded entities under section 67-25 of the ITAA 1997 and not excepted from the exclusion. Entities excluded by Division 67 of the ITAA 1997 include corporate tax entities (such as companies, corporate limited partnerships, corporate unit trusts and public trading trusts), unless they satisfy the requisite conditions as set out in subsection 67-25(1C) or subsection 67-25(1D) of the ITAA 1997. | Conversion of each CPS II and allotment of additional St. George Ordinary Shares - CGT implications: 110. Under the Transaction, each CPS II will Convert into one Ordinary Share through a variation of the rights attaching to each CPS II. Holders of the CPS II may also receive an allotment of additional St. George Ordinary Shares. 111. The CPS II will Convert into St. George Ordinary Shares on 20 August 2013, subject to the satisfaction of the Mandatory Conversion Conditions. If the Mandatory Conversion Conditions are not satisfied on that date, the Mandatory Conversion Date moves to the next Dividend Payment Date on which the conditions are satisfied. The CPS II may Convert earlier, if St. George elects to Convert CPS II into Ordinary Shares following the occurrence of certain events defined in the Terms. 112. Shares are comprised of a bundle of rights; however, those rights are not separate pieces of property capable of being divided out and held separately. Accordingly, the rights attaching to shares do not constitute individual assets as defined by section 108-5 of the ITAA 1997, but rather combine to make up the ultimate asset, being the share for CGT purposes: refer to Taxation Ruling TR 94/30. 113. Under section 104-25 of the ITAA 1997, CGT event C2 happens if, among other things, the ownership of an intangible asset, such as a preference share, ends by the share: 114. The mere variation of rights attaching to the CPS II is not a 'redemption' or 'cancellation' of the share for the purposes of paragraph 104-25(1)(a) of the ITAA 1997 and does not involve the conversion of the CPS II into equity interests for the purposes of paragraph 104-25(1)(f) of the ITAA 1997. 115. Furthermore, the relinquishment by the Holders of some of the rights attaching to the CPS II is not a CGT event that happens to part of the CGT asset comprised by each CPS II under section 112-30 of the ITAA 1997 (see Taxation Ruling TR 94/30, paragraph 40). 116. Although CGT event C2 does not happen as a result of the variation of the rights attaching to the CPS II, the receipt of money or other consideration in respect of such a variation may attract the operation of CGT event H2 (see Taxation Ruling 94/30, paragraphs 9 and 46 to 48). 117. Subsection 104-155(1) of the ITAA 1997 provides that CGT event H2 happens if an act, transaction or event occurs in relation to a CGT asset that you own and the act, transaction or event does not result in an adjustment being made to the asset's cost base or reduced cost base. 118. The Conversion of CPS II and allotment of additional St. George Ordinary Shares will result in an adjustment to the cost base and reduced cost base of the CPS II under Subdivision 130-A of the ITAA 1997. Accordingly, there is no act, transaction or event that happens in relation to the CPS II that does not result in an adjustment to that CPS II's cost base and reduced cost base. Therefore, CGT event H2 does not happen because of the Conversion of CPS II when the Conversion includes the allotment of additional Ordinary Shares. 119. CGT event H2 will happen when the Conversion of each CPS II does not include the allotment of additional Ordinary shares as this is an act, transaction or event in relation to the CPS II that does not result in an adjustment being made to the cost base or reduced cost base of the CPS II. 120. A capital gain is made if the capital proceeds from CGT event H2 are more than the incidental costs incurred in relation to the event. A capital loss is made if the capital proceeds are less than the incidental costs. 121. Subsection 116-20(2) of the ITAA 1997 provides that the capital proceeds from CGT event H2 happening is the money or other consideration received, or entitled to be received, because of the act, transaction or event. Paragraph 29 of Taxation Ruling TR 95/3 provides that 'consideration' for these purposes can include the benefit of mutual promises flowing to parties even if those promises are not in themselves property. 122. In this case the Commissioner does not consider that the Conversion constitutes capital proceeds because of the H2 event happening. 123. It is only when a subsequent CGT event happens to the converted CPS II that any capital proceeds may be received. When that CGT event happens, any capital proceeds would relate to the subsequent CGT event and not to the CGT event H2 that happened on the Conversion. 124. Therefore, Holders will make no capital gain or capital loss from the happening of CGT event H2 as there are no capital proceeds because of the event and no incidental costs are incurred by the Holders in respect of the event. 125. No other CGT event in Division 104 of the ITAA 1997 will happen because of the Conversion. | Allotment of additional St. George Ordinary Shares - dividend: 126. Subsection 6(1) of the ITAA 1936 defines a dividend to include any distribution made by a company to any of its shareholders, whether in money or other property, and any amount credited by a company to any of its shareholders as shareholders. 127. Although the additional St. George Ordinary Shares issued will constitute 'property' in the hands of the Holder, the allotment is not a disposition of property in the ordinary meaning of that expression (refer Ord Forrest Pty Ltd v. FC of T (1974) 130 CLR 124; 74 ATC 4034; (1974) 4 ATR 230). As there is no disposition there cannot be a distribution of property by St. George. 128. Furthermore, no amount is credited to the Holders, nor is an amount paid out of profits. 129. Accordingly, the allotment of additional St. George Ordinary Shares does not constitute a dividend within the meaning of subsection 6(1) of the ITAA 1936. | Allotment of additional St. George Ordinary Shares - ordinary income: 130. The allotment of additional St George Ordinary Shares will be a bonus issue within the meaning of paragraph 254A(1)(a) of the Corporations Act 2001 , that is, an issue of shares for which consideration is not payable. The issue of additional shares will result in a re-expression of the Holder's interest in the share capital of St George. Accordingly, the value of any additional shares issued on Conversion will not be assessable as ordinary income under subsection 6-5(1) of the ITAA 1997 ( Commissioner of Taxation v. McNeil (2007) 229 CLR 656; 2007 ATC 4223; (2007) 64 ATR 431). | Cost base of the additional Ordinary Shares: 131. Either section 6BA of the ITAA 1936 or Subdivision 130-A of the ITAA 1997 will apply to apportion the first element of the cost base and reduced cost base of the CPS II over the Converted CPS II and any additional St. George Ordinary Shares issued by St. George. 132. Section 6BA of the ITAA 1936 applies if a shareholder holds shares in a company (the original shares) and the company issues other shares (the bonus shares) in respect of the original shares. 133. Pursuant to subsection 6BA(3) of ITAA 1936, as the additional St. George Ordinary Shares are issued to Holders for no consideration and are not a dividend or taken to be a dividend, the issue price of the CPS II (being $100 per CPS II) will be apportioned over the Converted CPS II and any additional St. George Ordinary Shares allotted. 134. Subdivision 130-A of the ITAA 1997 applies in a similar manner in respect of shares that are CGT assets. It provides special rules relating to the time of acquisition and the cost base of bonus equities for CGT purposes. 135. Section 130-20 of the ITAA 1997 sets out what happens if an entity owns shares in a company (the original equities) and the company issues other shares (the bonus equities) in relation to the original equities. 136. Under item 1 of the table in subsection 130-20(3) of the ITAA 1997, as the additional shares are not a dividend nor taken to be a dividend, the first element of the cost base and reduced cost base of each CPS II is to be apportioned over both the Converted CPS II and any additional Ordinary Shares issued to the Holders by St. George. | Date of acquisition of the additional Ordinary Shares: 137. The Holders are taken to have acquired the additional Ordinary Shares at the time when the CPS II were originally acquired by the Holders, being 28 December 2007. 138. The following is a detailed contents list for this Ruling: Not previously issued as a draft

Ruling: Acquisition time of the CPS II: 59. Under section 109-10 of the ITAA 1997, each Holder acquired the CPS II on 28 December 2007, being the date the CPS II were issued to them. | CPS II cost base and reduced cost base: 60. Under subsections 110-25(2) and 110-55(2) of the ITAA 1997, the first element of the cost base and reduced cost base of each CPS II is $100. | Inclusion of Dividends in assessable income: 61. Holders of CPS II must include in their assessable income all Dividends received in respect of their CPS II under subparagraph 44(1)(a)(i) of the ITAA 1936, and an amount equal to the franking credit received on those Dividends under Division 207 of the ITAA 1997. | Entitlement to a tax offset: 62. Holders will be entitled to a tax offset equal to the franking credit received on the Dividends under subsection 207-20(2) of the ITAA 1997. | Anti-avoidance provisions - imputation benefits: 63. The Commissioner will not make a determination under paragraph 204-30(3)(c) of the ITAA 1997 to deny the whole, or any part, of the imputation benefits received in relation to the Dividends received by the Holders of the CPS II. 64. The Commissioner will not make a determination under paragraph 177EA(5)(b) of the ITAA 1936 to deny the whole, or any part, of the imputation benefits received in relation to the Dividends received by the Holders of the CPS II. | Gross-up and tax offset denied in certain circumstances: 65. Section 207-145 of the ITAA 1997 will not apply to the whole, or any part, of the Dividends received by the Holders of the CPS II. Accordingly, section 207-145 of the ITAA 1997 will not adjust the gross-up of the Holders' assessable income to exclude the franking credit, nor will it deny the tax offset to which the Holders would have otherwise been entitled. | Franking credit subject to the refundable tax offset rules: 66. Holders of CPS II who are entitled to a tax offset under Division 207 of the ITAA 1997, in respect of franking credits received, will also be subject to the refundable tax offset rules in Division 67 of the ITAA 1997, unless specifically excluded under section 67-25 of the ITAA 1997 and who are not excepted from the exclusion. Such excluded entities include certain trustees and corporate tax entities under subsections 67-25(1A) to (1D) of the ITAA 1997. | Conversion of each CPS II and allotment of additional St. George Ordinary Shares - capital gains tax (CGT) implications: 67. The Conversion of each CPS II into Ordinary Shares and the allotment of additional St George ordinary shares will not result in a CGT event for CGT purposes. 68. CGT event H2 in section 104-155 of the ITAA 1997 will not happen because on Conversion of each CPS II a cost base adjustment will be made to the CPS II as a consequence of the allotment of additional Ordinary shares. No other CGT event in Division 104 of the ITAA 1997 will happen because of the Conversion. | Allotment of additional St. George Ordinary Shares - dividend: 69. The allotment of additional St. George Ordinary Shares on Conversion of the CPS II will not be assessable as dividend income in the hands of the Holders. | Allotment of additional St George Ordinary Shares - ordinary income: 70. The value of any additional St George Ordinary Shares issued on Conversion of the CPS II shares will not be assessable as ordinary income in the hands of the Holders under subsection 6-5(1) of the ITAA 1997. | Cost base of the Ordinary Shares: 71. Either section 6BA of the ITAA 1936 or Subdivision 130-A of the ITAA 1997 will apply to apportion the first element of the cost base and reduced cost base of each CPS II over the Converted CPS II and any additional St. George Ordinary Shares allotted by St. George. | Date of acquisition of the additional Ordinary Shares: 72. Under subsection 130-20(3) of the ITAA 1997, the additional Ordinary Shares are taken to be acquired at the time the CPS II were originally acquired by the Holders, being 28 December 2007. Commissioner of Taxation 19 March 2008


Appendix: Acquisition time of the CPS II: 73. An equity interest that is issued or allotted by a company, is acquired when the contract is entered into or, if no contract exists, when the equity interests are issued or allotted: item 2 in the table in section 109-10 of the ITAA 1997. 74. Under the CPS II Prospectus, the CPS II offer opened on 27 November 2007 and had a staggered close in respect of the Securityholder Offer and Broker Firm Offer. St. George could withdraw or cancel the offer at any time before the issue date of 28 December 2007. The CPS II were issued on 28 December 2007. 75. For the purposes of item 2 in the table contained in section 109-10 of the ITAA 1997, the CPS II were acquired on 28 December 2007. | CPS II cost base and reduced cost base: 76. The first element of the cost base and reduced cost base includes the money paid, or required to be paid, in respect of acquiring a CGT asset: paragraph 110-25(2)(a) and subsection 110-55(2) of the ITAA 1997. 77. The Issue Price of the CPS II is $100 per CPS II. Accordingly, when CPS II are issued, the first element of the cost base and reduced cost base of each CPS II is $100. | Inclusion of Dividends in assessable income: 78. Subsection 44(1) of the ITAA 1936 provides, among other things, that the assessable income of a resident shareholder in a company includes dividends that are paid to the shareholder by the company out of profits derived by it from any source. 79. St. George advise the Dividends paid in respect of CPS II will be paid out of the retained profits of St. George. Accordingly, the Holders of CPS II must include the Dividend amount in their assessable income. | Inclusion of franking credits in assessable income: 80. St. George advises that it expects the Dividends paid in respect of the CPS II to be fully franked. Under the Australian imputation system, where a franked distribution is paid by an Australian resident company to a shareholder, the assessable income of the shareholder must also include the franking credit attached to the dividend under Division 207 of the ITAA 1997. The inclusion of both the dividend and the associated franking credit in a shareholder's assessable income is termed 'grossing-up' the dividend receipt. 81. Accordingly, the franking credits attached to the Dividends received by the Holders of CPS II must be included in their assessable income. | Entitlement to a tax offset: 82. In accordance with subsection 207-20(2) of the ITAA 1997, and with respect to the 'grossing-up' of the dividend receipt, the Holders are entitled to receive a tax offset equal to the value of the franking credit, which has been included in their assessable income. | Section 204-30: 83. Subdivision 204-D of the ITAA 1997 broadly enables the Commissioner to make a determination where distributions with attached imputation benefits are streamed to members of a corporate tax entity. 84. Section 204-30 of the ITAA 1997 prescribes the circumstances that are required to exist before the Commissioner may make such a determination. Section 204-30 applies where an entity 'streams' the payment of distributions in such a way that: 85. The existence of these conditions enables the Commissioner, under paragraph 204-30(3)(c) of the ITAA 1997, to make a determination that no imputation benefit is to arise in respect of the distributions made to those favoured members. 86. Streaming is not defined for the purposes of Subdivision 204-D of the ITAA 1997, however, it is understood to refer to a company selectively directing the flow of franked distributions to those members who can most benefit from the imputation credits: refer to paragraph 3.28 of the Explanatory Memorandum to the New Business Tax System (Imputation) Bill 2002. 87. St. George have indicated in the CPS II Prospectus that Dividends paid to the Holders are expected to be fully franked. Although the CPS II rank ahead of Ordinary Shares in respect of the payment of Dividends, St. George have advised that they have, and will continue, to pay fully franked dividends (to the extent of available franking credits in their franking account) to all of its shareholders, including shareholders of Ordinary Shares. There will be no change in St. George's dividend franking policy or dividend payout ratios on its share capital as a result of the issue of the CPS II. 88. As such, there is no evidence that the requisite element of streaming exists in relation to the franked distributions to be paid by St. George to Holders of CPS II. Accordingly, based on the information provided, the Commissioner will not make a determination under paragraph 204-30(3)(c) of the ITAA 1997 to deny imputation benefits to Holders of CPS II. | Section 177EA: 89. Section 177EA of the ITAA 1936 is a general anti-avoidance provision that applies where one of the purposes (other than an incidental purpose) of the scheme is to obtain an imputation benefit. Where these circumstances arise, subsection 177EA(5) of the ITAA 1936 enables the Commissioner to make a determination with the effect of either: 90. Pursuant to subsection 177EA(3) of the ITAA 1936, this provision applies if the following conditions are satisfied: 91. It is considered that the conditions in paragraphs 177EA(3)(a) to (d) of the ITAA 1936 are satisfied because: 92. Accordingly, the issue is whether having regard to the relevant circumstances of the scheme, it would be concluded that it was entered into or carried out for the purpose (which is not merely an incidental purpose) of enabling the relevant taxpayer to obtain an imputation benefit under the scheme. 93. Circumstances which are relevant in determining whether any person has the requisite purpose include, but are not limited to, the factors listed in subsection 177EA(17) of the ITAA 1936. The relevant circumstances listed encompass a range of circumstances which taken individually or collectively could indicate the requisite purpose. Due to the diverse nature of these circumstances, some may or may not be present at any one time in any one scheme. 94. St George advised that it redeemed its USD 250 million Depository Capital Securities in June 2007. Following the redemption, the St George group Tier 1 group capital adequacy ratio reduced to a ratio below what is required for APRA purposes. The issue of the CPS II is a capital raising transaction which St. George advised was undertaken to return St. George's Tier 1 Capital to within the range required by APRA. There is nothing in the Terms which would suggest it was entered into for the purpose (which is not merely an incidental purpose) of enabling the relevant taxpayer to obtain an imputation benefit under the scheme. 95. Based on the information provided, and having regard to the factors listed in subsection 177EA(17) of the ITAA 1936, the qualifications set out in this Ruling and the relevant circumstances of the scheme, it would not be reasonable to conclude that in entering into the scheme, St. George and/or the Holders of the CPS II demonstrate the objective purpose of securing imputation benefits for the Holders of the CPS II. To the extent that any imputation benefits are secured, those benefits are considered to be incidental to the more significant objective purposes of the raising of Tier 1 Capital by St. George to meet its capital adequacy requirements. 96. Accordingly, the Commissioner will not make a determination under paragraph 177EA(5)(b) of the ITAA 1936 that would deny the imputation benefits to the Holders of CPS II. | Gross-up and tax offset denied in certain circumstances: 97. Subdivision 207-F of the ITAA 1997 creates the appropriate adjustment to cancel the effect of the gross-up and tax offset rules where the entity concerned has manipulated the imputation system in a manner that is not permitted under the income tax law. 98. Section 207-145 of the ITAA 1997 provides the circumstances that must exist before this adjustment can occur. Pursuant to subsection 207-145(1) of the ITAA 1997 a 'manipulation of the imputation system' may occur where: 99. A person is a 'qualified person' for the purposes of Division 1A of former Part IIIAA of the ITAA 1936 if, generally speaking, they satisfy the holding period rule and the related payments rule (see former section 160APHO of the ITAA 1936). 100. The holding period rule applies where no related payment has, or will be made, in respect of the dividend, and requires the shares to have been continuously held at risk throughout the primary qualification period: former paragraph 160APHO(1)(a) of the ITAA 1936. 101. The related payments rule applies where the taxpayer or an associate, has made or will make, a related payment in respect of the dividend and requires the shares to have been continuously held at risk throughout the secondary qualification period: former subsection 160APHO(1) of the ITAA 1936 and former section 160APHN of the ITAA 1936. 102. The Holders of CPS II are qualified persons, provided that: 103. In determining whether a Holder is a 'qualified person' for the purposes of Division 1A of former Part IIIAA of the ITAA 1936, the Third Party Transfer facility contained in Clause 4 of the Terms, of itself, will not affect a Holder's risks of loss or opportunities for gain in respect of the CPS II. 104. The Commissioner has confirmed that he will not make a determination under paragraph 177EA(5)(b) of the ITAA 1936 or paragraph 204-30(3)(c) of the ITAA 1997 to deny the imputation benefits attached to Dividends paid by St. George to Holders of CPS II. 105. A distribution will be taken to be made as part of a dividend stripping operation, pursuant to section 207-155 of the ITAA 1997, where the distribution arose out of, or was made in the course of, a scheme or substantially similar arrangement that was in the nature of dividend stripping. The Transaction Documents provide no indication that the offering of CPS II and the associated payment of franked Dividends to the Holders in any way constitute a dividend stripping arrangement. As such, the dividend stripping provision will have no application to Holders of CPS II. 106. Accordingly, section 207-145 of the ITAA 1997 will not apply to deny imputation benefits to Holders of CPS II, as the requisite manipulation of the imputation system in respect of Dividends paid by St. George does not exist. | Franking credit subject to the refundable tax offset rules: 107. Holders of CPS II who are entitled to a tax offset under subsection 207-20(2) of the ITAA 1997 in respect of the grossing-up of their dividend receipts will also be subject to the refundable tax offset rules contained in Division 67 of the ITAA 1997, unless specifically excluded under subsections 67-25(1A) to (1D) of the ITAA 1997 and not being an exception to the excluded entities. 108. The refundable tax offset rules ensure that taxpayers are entitled to a refund, once their available tax offsets have been utilised to reduce any income tax liability to nil. 109. Accordingly, Holders of CPS II will be subject to the refundable tax offset rules unless they are listed as specifically excluded entities under section 67-25 of the ITAA 1997 and not excepted from the exclusion. Entities excluded by Division 67 of the ITAA 1997 include corporate tax entities (such as companies, corporate limited partnerships, corporate unit trusts and public trading trusts), unless they satisfy the requisite conditions as set out in subsection 67-25(1C) or subsection 67-25(1D) of the ITAA 1997. | Conversion of each CPS II and allotment of additional St. George Ordinary Shares - CGT implications: 110. Under the Transaction, each CPS II will Convert into one Ordinary Share through a variation of the rights attaching to each CPS II. Holders of the CPS II may also receive an allotment of additional St. George Ordinary Shares. 111. The CPS II will Convert into St. George Ordinary Shares on 20 August 2013, subject to the satisfaction of the Mandatory Conversion Conditions. If the Mandatory Conversion Conditions are not satisfied on that date, the Mandatory Conversion Date moves to the next Dividend Payment Date on which the conditions are satisfied. The CPS II may Convert earlier, if St. George elects to Convert CPS II into Ordinary Shares following the occurrence of certain events defined in the Terms. 112. Shares are comprised of a bundle of rights; however, those rights are not separate pieces of property capable of being divided out and held separately. Accordingly, the rights attaching to shares do not constitute individual assets as defined by section 108-5 of the ITAA 1997, but rather combine to make up the ultimate asset, being the share for CGT purposes: refer to Taxation Ruling TR 94/30. 113. Under section 104-25 of the ITAA 1997, CGT event C2 happens if, among other things, the ownership of an intangible asset, such as a preference share, ends by the share: 114. The mere variation of rights attaching to the CPS II is not a 'redemption' or 'cancellation' of the share for the purposes of paragraph 104-25(1)(a) of the ITAA 1997 and does not involve the conversion of the CPS II into equity interests for the purposes of paragraph 104-25(1)(f) of the ITAA 1997. 115. Furthermore, the relinquishment by the Holders of some of the rights attaching to the CPS II is not a CGT event that happens to part of the CGT asset comprised by each CPS II under section 112-30 of the ITAA 1997 (see Taxation Ruling TR 94/30, paragraph 40). 116. Although CGT event C2 does not happen as a result of the variation of the rights attaching to the CPS II, the receipt of money or other consideration in respect of such a variation may attract the operation of CGT event H2 (see Taxation Ruling 94/30, paragraphs 9 and 46 to 48). 117. Subsection 104-155(1) of the ITAA 1997 provides that CGT event H2 happens if an act, transaction or event occurs in relation to a CGT asset that you own and the act, transaction or event does not result in an adjustment being made to the asset's cost base or reduced cost base. 118. The Conversion of CPS II and allotment of additional St. George Ordinary Shares will result in an adjustment to the cost base and reduced cost base of the CPS II under Subdivision 130-A of the ITAA 1997. Accordingly, there is no act, transaction or event that happens in relation to the CPS II that does not result in an adjustment to that CPS II's cost base and reduced cost base. Therefore, CGT event H2 does not happen because of the Conversion of CPS II when the Conversion includes the allotment of additional Ordinary Shares. 119. CGT event H2 will happen when the Conversion of each CPS II does not include the allotment of additional Ordinary shares as this is an act, transaction or event in relation to the CPS II that does not result in an adjustment being made to the cost base or reduced cost base of the CPS II. 120. A capital gain is made if the capital proceeds from CGT event H2 are more than the incidental costs incurred in relation to the event. A capital loss is made if the capital proceeds are less than the incidental costs. 121. Subsection 116-20(2) of the ITAA 1997 provides that the capital proceeds from CGT event H2 happening is the money or other consideration received, or entitled to be received, because of the act, transaction or event. Paragraph 29 of Taxation Ruling TR 95/3 provides that 'consideration' for these purposes can include the benefit of mutual promises flowing to parties even if those promises are not in themselves property. 122. In this case the Commissioner does not consider that the Conversion constitutes capital proceeds because of the H2 event happening. 123. It is only when a subsequent CGT event happens to the converted CPS II that any capital proceeds may be received. When that CGT event happens, any capital proceeds would relate to the subsequent CGT event and not to the CGT event H2 that happened on the Conversion. 124. Therefore, Holders will make no capital gain or capital loss from the happening of CGT event H2 as there are no capital proceeds because of the event and no incidental costs are incurred by the Holders in respect of the event. 125. No other CGT event in Division 104 of the ITAA 1997 will happen because of the Conversion. | Allotment of additional St. George Ordinary Shares - dividend: 126. Subsection 6(1) of the ITAA 1936 defines a dividend to include any distribution made by a company to any of its shareholders, whether in money or other property, and any amount credited by a company to any of its shareholders as shareholders. 127. Although the additional St. George Ordinary Shares issued will constitute 'property' in the hands of the Holder, the allotment is not a disposition of property in the ordinary meaning of that expression (refer Ord Forrest Pty Ltd v. FC of T (1974) 130 CLR 124; 74 ATC 4034; (1974) 4 ATR 230). As there is no disposition there cannot be a distribution of property by St. George. 128. Furthermore, no amount is credited to the Holders, nor is an amount paid out of profits. 129. Accordingly, the allotment of additional St. George Ordinary Shares does not constitute a dividend within the meaning of subsection 6(1) of the ITAA 1936. | Allotment of additional St. George Ordinary Shares - ordinary income: 130. The allotment of additional St George Ordinary Shares will be a bonus issue within the meaning of paragraph 254A(1)(a) of the Corporations Act 2001 , that is, an issue of shares for which consideration is not payable. The issue of additional shares will result in a re-expression of the Holder's interest in the share capital of St George. Accordingly, the value of any additional shares issued on Conversion will not be assessable as ordinary income under subsection 6-5(1) of the ITAA 1997 ( Commissioner of Taxation v. McNeil (2007) 229 CLR 656; 2007 ATC 4223; (2007) 64 ATR 431). | Cost base of the additional Ordinary Shares: 131. Either section 6BA of the ITAA 1936 or Subdivision 130-A of the ITAA 1997 will apply to apportion the first element of the cost base and reduced cost base of the CPS II over the Converted CPS II and any additional St. George Ordinary Shares issued by St. George. 132. Section 6BA of the ITAA 1936 applies if a shareholder holds shares in a company (the original shares) and the company issues other shares (the bonus shares) in respect of the original shares. 133. Pursuant to subsection 6BA(3) of ITAA 1936, as the additional St. George Ordinary Shares are issued to Holders for no consideration and are not a dividend or taken to be a dividend, the issue price of the CPS II (being $100 per CPS II) will be apportioned over the Converted CPS II and any additional St. George Ordinary Shares allotted. 134. Subdivision 130-A of the ITAA 1997 applies in a similar manner in respect of shares that are CGT assets. It provides special rules relating to the time of acquisition and the cost base of bonus equities for CGT purposes. 135. Section 130-20 of the ITAA 1997 sets out what happens if an entity owns shares in a company (the original equities) and the company issues other shares (the bonus equities) in relation to the original equities. 136. Under item 1 of the table in subsection 130-20(3) of the ITAA 1997, as the additional shares are not a dividend nor taken to be a dividend, the first element of the cost base and reduced cost base of each CPS II is to be apportioned over both the Converted CPS II and any additional Ordinary Shares issued to the Holders by St. George. | Date of acquisition of the additional Ordinary Shares: 137. The Holders are taken to have acquired the additional Ordinary Shares at the time when the CPS II were originally acquired by the Holders, being 28 December 2007.


What this Ruling is about | NOT LEGALLY BINDING SECTION: | A public ruling is an expression of the Commissioner's opinion about the way in which a relevant provision applies, or would apply, to entities generally or to a class of entities in relation to a particular scheme or a class of schemes. | If you rely on this ruling, we must apply the law to you in the way set out in the ruling (or in a way that is more favourable for you if we are satisfied that the ruling is incorrect and disadvantages you, and we are not prevented from doing so by a time limit imposed by the law). You will be protected from having to pay any underpaid tax, penalty or interest in respect of the matters covered by this ruling if it turns out that it does not correctly state how the relevant provision applies to you. | Dividend Rate x Face Value x N 365 | Dividend Rate = (Bank Bill Swap Rate + Margin) x (1 - Tax Rate) | N is the number of days in the Dividend Period ending on (but not including) the relevant Dividend Payment Date . | Conversion of each CPS and allotment of additional St. George Ordinary Shares - capital gains tax (CGT) implications | Appendix 2 - Detailed contents list


Related rulings: TR 94/30 TR 95/3
Legislative references: ITAA 1936 6(1) ITAA 1936 6BA ITAA 1936 6BA(3) ITAA 1936 44(1) ITAA 1936 44(1)(a)(i) ITAA 1936 Pt IIIAA Div 1A ITAA 1936 160APHJ ITAA 1936 160APHM ITAA 1936 160APHN ITAA 1936 160APHO ITAA 1936 160APHO(1) ITAA 1936 160APHO(1)(a) ITAA 1936 160APHO(2) ITAA 1936 160APHO(3) ITAA 1936 177EA ITAA 1936 177EA(3) ITAA 1936 177EA(3)(a) ITAA 1936 177EA(3)(b) ITAA 1936 177EA(3)(c) ITAA 1936 177EA(3)(d) ITAA 1936 177EA(5) ITAA 1936 177EA(5)(b) ITAA 1936 177EA(14)(a) ITAA 1936 177EA(17) ITAA 1997 6-5 ITAA 1997 6-5(1) ITAA 1997 Div 67 ITAA 1997 67-25 ITAA 1997 67-25(1A) ITAA 1997 67-25(1B) ITAA 1997 67-25(1C) ITAA 1997 67-25(1D) ITAA 1997 Div 104 ITAA 1997 104-25 ITAA 1997 104-25(1)(a) ITAA 1997 104-25(1)(f) ITAA 1997 104-155 ITAA 1997 104-155(1) ITAA 1997 108-5 ITAA 1997 109-10 ITAA 1997 110-25 ITAA 1997 110-25(2) ITAA 1997 110-25(2)(a) ITAA 1997 110-55 ITAA 1997 110-55(2) ITAA 1997 112-30 ITAA 1997 116-20(2) ITAA 1997 Subdiv 130-A ITAA 1997 130-20 ITAA 1997 130-20(3) ITAA 1997 Subdiv 197-A ITAA 1997 202-40 ITAA 1997 202-45 ITAA 1997 Subdiv 204-D ITAA 1997 204-30 ITAA 1997 204-30(1)(a) ITAA 1997 204-30(1)(b) ITAA 1997 204-30(1)(c) ITAA 1997 204-30(3)(c) ITAA 1997 Div 207 ITAA 1997 207-20 ITAA 1997 207-20(2) ITAA 1997 Subdiv 207-F ITAA 1997 207-145 ITAA 1997 207-145(1) ITAA 1997 207-145(1)(a) ITAA 1997 207-145(1)(b) ITAA 1997 207-145(1)(c) ITAA 1997 207-145(1)(d) ITAA 1997 207-155 ITAA 1997 960-130 ITAA 1997 960-135 ITAA 1997 Div 974 TAA 1953 TAA 1953 Sch 1 357-75(1) Copyright Act 1968 Corporations Act 2001 Corporations Act 2001 254A(1)(a)
Case references: Commissioner of Taxation v. McNeil (2007) 229 CLR 656 2007 ATC 4223 (2007) 64 ATR 431
Subject references: acquisition dates capital gains tax CGT cost base conversion of securities dividend imputation franking rebates preference shares
Other references: Explanatory Memorandum to the New Business Tax System (Imputation) Bill 2002