Taxation Determination TD 2000/50




Examples: Example 1: 5. A Co owns 70 % of the voting shares in B Co . A Co makes a takeover offer for the remaining shares in B Co . As a result of the takeover A Co acquires a further 15 % of the shares in B Co . The takeover has resulted in A Co becoming the owner of 85 % of the shares in B Co . | Example 2: 6. Members of the A Co wholly - owned group of companies own 83 % of the voting shares in B Co . A member of the group makes a takeover offer for the remaining shares in B Co . As a result of the takeover , members of the A Co group acquire a further 0 . 6 % of the shares in B Co . The takeover has resulted in members of the A Co group becoming the owners of 83 . 6 % of the shares in B Co . Commissioner of Taxation 22 November 2000 Previously released in draft form as TD 2000/D11



The number, subject heading, date of effect and paragraphs 1-4 of this Taxation Determination are a 'public ruling' for the purposes of Part IVAAA of the Taxation Administration Act 1953 and are legally binding on the Commissioner. Taxation Rulings TR 92/1 and TR 97/16 together explain how a Determination is legally binding. | This Taxation Determination applies to years commencing both before and after its date of issue . However , it does not apply to taxpayers to the extent that it conflicts with the terms of settlement of a dispute agreed to before the date of the Determination ( see paragraphs 21 and 22 of Taxation Ruling TR 92 / 20 ). | 1. Yes. A company or wholly owned group of companies can become the owner of 80% or more of the voting shares in another company even if the company or group owned 80% or more of those shares before the arrangement provided that they owned a greater percentage after the arrangement. | 2. Subparagraph 124-780(2)(a)(i) requires that the arrangement result in the company which is the acquiring entity becoming the owner of 80% or more of the voting shares in the original entity. The subparagraph merely requires a view of the percentage ownership of voting shares after the arrangement. Note 1 after paragraph 124-780(2)(c) recognises that shares held before the arrangement started can be taken into account in considering the 80% or more requirement. | 3. If the acquiring entity owns some voting shares in the original entity before the arrangement but as a result of the arrangement owns 80% or more voting shares in the original entity after the arrangement, the acquiring entity will have become the owner of 80% or more of the voting shares in the original entity. This will be so even if the acquiring entity started out owning 80% or more of the voting shares in the original entity provided that it owned a greater percentage after the arrangement. In terms of subparagraph 124-780(2)(a)(i), the arrangement will result in the acquiring entity becoming the owner of 80% or more of the voting shares in the original entity provided that it started out owning fewer voting shares than it did after the arrangement. There is no minimum number or percentage of shares that the acquiring entity must acquire as result of the arrangement. | 4. Subparagraph 124-780(2)(a)(ii) requires that the arrangement result in either the company (which is the acquiring entity and is a member of a wholly-owned group) or the members of the group becoming the owner of 80% or more of the voting shares in the original entity. It should be construed in a similar manner.


Legislative references: ITAA 1997 124-780(2)(a) ITAA 1997 124-780(2)(a)(i) ITAA 1997 124-780(2)(a)(ii) ITAA 1997 124-780(2)(c)
Subject references: arrangement become becoming capital gain company owner scrip for scrip roll-over voting shares