Class Ruling CR 2007/3
Date of effect: 19 December 2006

What this ruling is about: 1. This Ruling sets out the Commissioner's opinion on the way in which the relevant provision(s) identified below apply to the defined class of entities, who take part in the scheme to which this Ruling relates. Relevant provision(s) 2. The relevant provisions dealt with in this Ruling are: Class of entities 3. The class of entities to which this Ruling applies are the Australian resident investors (referred to as 'Holders') who subscribed and were allotted St.George Bank Limited (St.George) Converting Preference Shares (CPS) and who hold the CPS on capital account. 4. The class of entities to which this Ruling applies does not extend to investors in the CPS who acquired them otherwise than by initial subscription. 5. This Ruling does not deal with how the taxation law applies to Holders who hold the CPS as trading stock or revenue assets. 6. This Ruling does not consider the tax implications of the exchange of CPS by redemption, cancellation or buy-back. 7. This Ruling does not consider how the gross-up and tax offset rules in Division 207 of the ITAA 1997 apply to partnership or trustee Holders, or to indirect distributions to partners in a partnership, or beneficiaries or trustees of a trust. 8. This Ruling does not deal with how the taxation law applies to St.George in relation to the issue of CPS. Qualifications 9. The Commissioner makes this Ruling based on the precise scheme identified in this Ruling. 10. The class of entities defined in this Ruling may rely on its contents provided the scheme actually carried out is carried out in accordance with the scheme described in paragraphs 18 to 58 of this Ruling. 11. If the scheme actually carried out is materially different from the scheme that is described in this Ruling, then: 12. This work is copyright. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968 , no part may be reproduced by any process without prior written permission from the Commonwealth. Requests and inquiries concerning reproduction and rights should be addressed to:

Class of entities or scheme: 3. The class of entities to which this Ruling applies are the Australian resident investors (referred to as 'Holders') who subscribed and were allotted St.George Bank Limited (St.George) Converting Preference Shares (CPS) and who hold the CPS on capital account. 4. The class of entities to which this Ruling applies does not extend to investors in the CPS who acquired them otherwise than by initial subscription. 5. This Ruling does not deal with how the taxation law applies to Holders who hold the CPS as trading stock or revenue assets. 6. This Ruling does not consider the tax implications of the exchange of CPS by redemption, cancellation or buy-back. 7. This Ruling does not consider how the gross-up and tax offset rules in Division 207 of the ITAA 1997 apply to partnership or trustee Holders, or to indirect distributions to partners in a partnership, or beneficiaries or trustees of a trust. 8. This Ruling does not deal with how the taxation law applies to St.George in relation to the issue of CPS. | Qualifications: 9. The Commissioner makes this Ruling based on the precise scheme identified in this Ruling. 10. The class of entities defined in this Ruling may rely on its contents provided the scheme actually carried out is carried out in accordance with the scheme described in paragraphs 18 to 58 of this Ruling. 11. If the scheme actually carried out is materially different from the scheme that is described in this Ruling, then: 12. This work is copyright. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968 , no part may be reproduced by any process without prior written permission from the Commonwealth. Requests and inquiries concerning reproduction and rights should be addressed to: 13. This Ruling applies from 19 December 2006 to 30 June 2013. However, the Ruling continues to apply after this date to all entities within the specified class who entered into the specified scheme at the time of the initial allotment of CPS, subject to there being no change in the scheme or in the entities involved in the scheme. 14. The Ruling does not apply to taxpayers to the extent that it conflicts with the terms of settlement of a dispute agreed to before the date of issue of the Ruling. Furthermore, the Ruling only applies to the extent that: 15. If this Class Ruling is inconsistent with a later public or private ruling, the relevant class of entities may rely on either ruling which applies to them (item 1 of subsection 357-75(1) of Schedule 1 to the Taxation Administration Act 1953 (TAA)). 16. If this Class Ruling is inconsistent with an earlier private ruling, the private ruling is taken not to have been made if, when the Class Ruling is made, the following two conditions are met: 17. If the above two conditions do not apply, the relevant class of entities may rely on either ruling which applies to them (item 3 of subsection 357-75(1) of Schedule 1 to the TAA). 18. The following description of the scheme is based on information provided by the applicant. The scheme that is the subject of this Ruling is based on the following documents (Transaction Documents). These documents, or the relevant parts of them, as the case may be, form part of and are to be read in conjunction with this description. 19. The relevant documents, or parts of documents, to be read in conjunction with this description are: Note: certain information which relates to the affairs of St.George that is not in the public domain has been taken into account in determining the Commissioner's opinion set out in this Ruling (including the application of certain anti-avoidance provisions). This information has been provided on a commercial-in-confidence basis and will not be disclosed or released under the Freedom of Information legislation. 20. On 19 December 2006 St.George allotted 3.25 million CPS. The CPS were issued pursuant to the St.George Converting Preference Shares Prospectus (CPS Prospectus) dated 8 November 2006 and lodged with the Australian Securities and Investment Commission on the same date. The CPS were issued as fully paid at $100 face value for each CPS. The issue raised $325 million. 21. The CPS offer was available to: 22. There was no general public offer of CPS. 23. The CPS are listed on the Australian Stock Exchange. 24. St.George is subject to regulation by the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA). APRA requires Authorised Deposit-taking Institutions (ADI's) to maintain specified minimum ratios of total capital to risk-weighted assets. For this purpose, APRA issues Prudential Standards and Guidance Notes (Standards). 25. In March 2006, following the conversion by St.George of the $300 million Preferred Resetting Yield Marketable Equity Securities (PRYMES) and a buy-back of ordinary shares, St.George's Tier 1 Capital ratio was below its target range of 7.0% to 7.5%. 26. APRA granted St.George temporary relief on meeting their capital adequacy requirements while APRA's Standards on Tier 1 Capital instruments were being finalised. 27. These APRA Standards have since been released, with effect from 1 July 2006. St.George has advised that the issue of the CPS will assist St.George in meeting its Tier 1 Capital requirements under the new APRA Standards. 28. Under the new APRA Standards, Tier 1 Capital is comprised of Fundamental Tier 1 Capital (such as ordinary shares) and Residual Tier 1 Capital (which includes Non-innovative Tier 1 Capital and Innovative Tier 1 Capital). 29. From 1 January 2008, there is a further restriction on the composition of the Residual Tier 1 Capital that will count as Tier 1 Capital. From this date, APRA Standards impose a maximum limit on the amount of Innovative Tier 1 Capital that will qualify for Tier 1 Capital status. St.George has advised that it needs to take into account how those Standards operate from 1 January 2008 to ensure that the CPS will continue to assist St.George meet its Tier 1 Capital adequacy requirements. 30. Using those limits that will apply from 1 January 2008 and based on its current capital mix, St.George has advised that it reached the maximum percentage of Innovative Tier 1 Capital that can be included as Tier 1 Capital prior to issue of the CPS. 31. APRA has classified the CPS as 'Non-innovative Residual Tier 1 Capital' pursuant to the Standards. 32. The issue of CPS returned St.George's Tier 1 Capital Ratio to within its target range of 7.0% to 7.5%. 33. St.George advise that proceeds of the CPS issue will be used to fund the ongoing growth of St.George's business. | CPS Prospectus dated 8 November 2006 and Terms: 34. The CPS are non-cumulative unsecured converting preference shares in the capital of St.George. The Holders of CPS are entitled to receive a preferred non-cumulative floating rate Dividend payable quarterly in arrears. | Dividend calculation: 35. The Holder of each CPS is entitled to receive a dividend (Dividend) payable in arrears (starting 20 February 2007) calculated using the following formula: where: Dividend Rate = (Bank Bill Swap Rate + Margin) x (1 - Tax Rate) where: 36. St.George expects the Dividends to be fully franked. If the Dividend is unfranked or partially franked, the Dividend will be increased to compensate for the unfranked component, as determined by the calculation in clause 2.2 of the Terms. In addition, if the Australian corporate tax rate applicable to the franking account of St.George from which the Dividend will be franked differs from the Tax Rate, the Dividend will also be adjusted downwards or upwards accordingly. | Dividend payment conditions: 37. The payment of a Dividend or any optional dividend (Optional Dividend), is, among other things, subject to the following conditions: 38. The Dividends are non-cumulative and the Holders will not have any recourse in the event of non-payment. Accordingly, non-payment of all or part of a declared Dividend does not constitute an event of default by St.George, and Holders have no claim in respect of such non-payment. 39. The Holders of the CPS are also not entitled to any interest on unpaid Dividends or Optional Dividends. 40. A Dividend or Optional Dividend is only payable to those persons registered as Holders on the Record Date for that Dividend or Optional Dividend respectively. | CPS Conversion into Ordinary Shares: 41. St.George must Convert all CPS on issue into Ordinary Shares on the Mandatory Conversion Date (refer to paragraph 44 of this Ruling for the meaning of Convert for the purposes of this Ruling). 42. The Mandatory Conversion Date will be the earlier of 20 August 2012 and the first Dividend Payment Date thereafter where both of the Mandatory Conversion Conditions are satisfied. 43. The Mandatory Conversion Conditions are: 44. The CPS will Convert into Ordinary Shares by the variation of the rights and restrictions attaching to the CPS, such that each CPS will have all the rights attaching to one fully paid Ordinary Share and will rank equally with all other Ordinary Shares on issue. In addition, all other rights and restrictions conferred on the CPS under the Terms will generally no longer have any effect. (Conversion and Converted have the corresponding meaning for the purposes of this Ruling.) 45. Each Holder may also be allotted an additional number of fully paid Ordinary Shares for each CPS Converted in accordance with the relevant formula set out in clause 3.5 of the Terms, and as adjusted by clause 3.6 to clause 3.11 of the Terms. 46. The total market value of the Ordinary Shares held by a Holder immediately after the Conversion of the CPS will approximate the Issue Price of the CPS ($100). 47. Clause 3.4 of the Terms states that Conversion does not constitute redemption, buy-back or cancellation of a CPS or an issue, allotment or creation of a new share (other than any additional Ordinary Shares allotted). | Exchange Notice: 48. Subject to APRA's prior written approval, St.George must serve an Exchange Notice following the occurrence of an Acquisition Event. St.George may, also subject to APRA's prior written approval, serve an Exchange Notice following the occurrence of a Regulatory Event or a Tax Event. 49. An Exchange Notice gives St.George the right in respect of all (but not some only) of the CPS to do any one or combination of the following: 50. St.George must serve an Exchange Notice, no later than the latest to occur of the following two events: 51. An Exchange Notice given by St.George is irrevocable. 52. Broadly, an Acquisition Event will occur when a takeover bid is made to acquire all or some Ordinary Shares and the offer is or becomes unconditional, or where the Directors issue a statement recommending a scheme of arrangement. 53. A Regulatory Event will broadly occur as a result of any development in respect of securities laws of Australia generally that the Directors at their sole discretion determine to be unacceptable, or where the Directors determine that St.George is not or will not be entitled to treat all CPS as eligible Tier 1 Capital. 54. A Tax Event will broadly occur as a result of any development in respect of taxation generally that has more than an insubstantial risk to: | General rights attaching to CPS: 55. CPS are not deposit liabilities of St.George. CPS rank equally among themselves and are unsecured and subordinated to all depositors and creditors of St.George. Furthermore, CPS rank equally with all other Equal Ranking Capital Securities in respect of the payment of Dividends which have been declared and in respect of the payment of dividends or other distributions which have been declared or are payable on all other Equal Ranking Capital Securities. CPS rank equally with Equal Ranking Capital Securities in respect of a redemption of, return of capital on, cancellation of or acquisition of CPS and payment of declared but unpaid Dividends on a winding up of St.George. 56. Equal Ranking Capital Securities means in respect of a dividend or distribution, any equity, hybrid or subordinated debt capital security (whether comprised of one or more instruments) issued by St.George or a member of the Group which ranks for the payment of dividend or distribution equally with CPS. Capital Securities which rank equally for the payment of dividend or distribution include SAINTS, SPS and Depository Capital Securities. 57. Holders of CPS will not be entitled to speak or vote at any general meeting of St.George except in limited circumstances. 58. This Ruling is made on the basis that: | Acquisition time of the CPS: 59. For capital gains tax purposes, pursuant to section 109-10 of the ITAA 1997, each Holder acquired the CPS on 19 December 2006, being the date the CPS were allotted to them. | CPS cost base and reduced cost base: 60. For capital gains tax purposes, pursuant to subsections 110-25(2) and 110-55(2) of the ITAA 1997, the first element of the cost base and reduced cost base of each CPS is $100. | Inclusion of Dividends in assessable income: 61. Holders of CPS must include in their assessable income all Dividends received in respect of their CPS under subparagraph 44(1)(a)(i) of the ITAA 1936, and an amount equal to the franking credit received on those Dividends under Division 207 of the ITAA 1997. | Entitlement to a tax offset: 62. Holders will be entitled to a tax offset equal to the franking credit received on the Dividends under subsection 207-20(2) of the ITAA 1997. | Anti-avoidance provisions - imputation benefits: 63. The Commissioner will not make a determination under paragraph 204-30(3)(c) of the ITAA 1997 to deny the whole, or any part, of the imputation benefits received in relation to the Dividends received by the Holders of the CPS. 64. The Commissioner will not make a determination under paragraph 177EA(5)(b) of the ITAA 1936 to deny the whole, or any part, of the imputation benefits received in relation to the Dividends received by the Holders of the CPS. | Gross-up and tax offset denied in certain circumstances: 65. Section 207-145 of the ITAA 1997 will not apply to the whole, or any part, of the Dividends received by the Holders of the CPS. Accordingly, section 207-145 will not adjust the gross-up of the Holders' assessable income to exclude the franking credit, nor will it deny the tax offset to which the Holders would have otherwise been entitled. | Franking credit subject to the refundable tax offset rules: 66. Holders of CPS who are entitled to a tax offset under Division 207 of the ITAA 1997, in respect of franking credits received, will also be subject to the refundable tax offset rules in Division 67 of the ITAA 1997, unless specifically excluded under section 67-25 of the ITAA 1997 and who are not excepted from the exclusion. Such excluded entities include certain trustees and corporate tax entities under subsections 67-25(1A) to (1D) of the ITAA 1997. | Conversion of each CPS and allotment of additional St.George Ordinary Shares - capital gains tax (CGT) implications: 67. No CGT event happens as result of either the Conversion of each CPS or the allotment of additional Ordinary shares. | Allotment of additional St.George Ordinary Shares - dividend: 68. The allotment of additional St.George Ordinary Shares on Conversion of the CPS will not be assessable as dividend income in the hands of the Holders. | Cost base of the Ordinary Shares: 69. Either section 6BA of the ITAA 1936 or Subdivision 130-A of the ITAA 1997 will apply to apportion the first element of the cost base and reduced cost base of each CPS over the Converted CPS and any additional St.George Ordinary Shares issued by St.George. | Date of acquisition of the additional Ordinary Shares: 70. The additional Ordinary Shares are taken to be acquired at the time the CPS were originally acquired by the Holders, being 19 December 2006. | Anti-avoidance provisions - additional Ordinary Shares: 71. The value of the additional St.George Ordinary Shares at either the Mandatory Conversion Date or Exchange Date will not be treated as an unfranked dividend under section 45 of the ITAA 1936. 72. The Commissioner will not make a determination under subsection 45A(2) of the ITAA 1936 to the effect that the whole or part of the capital benefit is an unfranked dividend in the hands of the Holders of the CPS. 73. The Commissioner will not make a determination under subsection 45B(3) of the ITAA 1936 to the effect that the whole or part of the capital benefit is an unfranked dividend in the hands of the Holders of the CPS. Commissioner of Taxation 10 January 2007 | Acquisition time of the CPS: 74. An equity interest that is issued or allotted by a company, is acquired when the contract is entered into or, if no contract exists, when the equity interests are issued or allotted: item 2 in the table in section 109-10 of the ITAA 1997. 75. Under the CPS Prospectus, the CPS offer opened on 16 November 2006 and had a staggered close in respect of the Securityholder Offer and Broker Firm Offer. St.George could withdraw or cancel the offer at any time before the allotment date of 19 December 2006. The CPS were allotted on 19 December 2006. 76. For the purposes of item 2 of the table contained in section 109-10 of the ITAA 1997, the CPS were acquired on 19 December 2006. | CPS cost base and reduced cost base: 77. The first element of the cost base and reduced cost base includes the money paid, or required to be paid, in respect of acquiring a CGT asset: paragraph 110-25(2)(a) and subsection 110-55(2) of the ITAA 1997. 78. The Issue Price of the CPS is $100 per CPS. Accordingly, when CPS are allotted, the first element of the cost base and reduced cost base of each CPS is $100. | Inclusion of Dividends in assessable income: 79. Subsection 44(1) of the ITAA 1936 requires, among other things, that the assessable income of a resident shareholder in a company includes dividends that are paid to the shareholder by the company out of profits derived by it from any source. 80. St.George advise the Dividends paid in respect of CPS will be paid out of the retained profits of St.George. Accordingly, the Holders of CPS must include the Dividend amount in their assessable income. | Inclusion of franking credits in assessable income: 81. St.George advise that it expects the Dividends paid in respect of the CPS to be fully franked. Under the Australian imputation system, where a franked distribution is paid by an Australian resident company to a shareholder, the assessable income of the shareholder must also include the franking credit attached to the dividend under Division 207 of the ITAA 1997. The inclusion of both the dividend and the associated franking credit in a shareholder's assessable income is termed 'grossing-up' the dividend receipt. 82. Accordingly, the franking credits attached to the Dividends received by the Holders of CPS must be included in their assessable income. | Entitlement to a tax offset: 83. In accordance with subsection 207-20(2) of the ITAA 1997, and with respect to the 'grossing-up' of the dividend receipt, the Holders are entitled to receive a tax offset equal to the value of the franking credit which has been included in their assessable income. | Section 204-30: 84. Subdivision 204-D of the ITAA 1997 broadly enables the Commissioner to make a determination where distributions with attached imputation benefits are streamed to members of a corporate tax entity. 85. Section 204-30 of the ITAA 1997 prescribes the circumstances that are required to exist before the Commissioner may make such a determination. Section 204-30 applies where an entity 'streams' the payment of distributions in such a way that: 86. The existence of these conditions enables the Commissioner, under paragraph 204-30(3)(c) of the ITAA 1997, to make a determination that no imputation benefit is to arise in respect of the distributions made to those favoured members. 87. Streaming is not defined for the purposes of Subdivision 204-D of the ITAA 1997, however, it is understood to refer to a company selectively directing the flow of franked distributions to those members who can most benefit from the imputation credits: refer to paragraph 3.28 of the Explanatory Memorandum to the New Business Tax System (Imputation) Bill 2002. 88. St.George have indicated in the CPS Prospectus that Dividends paid to the Holders are expected to be fully franked. Although the CPS rank ahead of Ordinary Shares in respect of the payment of Dividends, St.George have advised that they have, and will continue, to pay fully franked dividends (to the extent of available franking credits in their franking account) to all of its shareholders, including shareholders of Ordinary Shares. There will be no change in St.George's dividend franking policy or dividend payout ratios on its share capital as a result of the issue of the CPS. 89. As such, there is no evidence that the requisite element of streaming exists in relation to the franked distributions to be paid by St.George to Holders of CPS. Accordingly, based on the information provided, the Commissioner will not make a determination under paragraph 204-30(3)(c) of the ITAA 1997 to deny imputation benefits to Holders of CPS. | Section 177EA: 90. Section 177EA of the ITAA 1936 is a general anti-avoidance provision that applies where one of the purposes (other than an incidental purpose) of the scheme is to obtain an imputation benefit. Where these circumstances arise, subsection 177EA(5) enables the Commissioner to make a determination with the effect of either: 91. Pursuant to subsection 177EA(3) of the ITAA 1936, this provision applies if the following conditions are satisfied: 92. It is considered that the conditions in paragraphs 177EA(3)(a) to (d) of the ITAA 1936 are satisfied because: 93. Accordingly, the issue is whether having regard to the relevant circumstances of the scheme, it would be concluded that it was entered into or carried out for the purpose (which is not merely an incidental purpose) of enabling the relevant taxpayer to obtain an imputation benefit under the scheme. 94. Circumstances which are relevant in determining whether any person has the requisite purpose include, but are not limited to, the factors listed in subsection 177EA(17) of the ITAA 1936. The relevant circumstances listed encompass a range of circumstances which taken individually or collectively could indicate the requisite purpose. Due to the diverse nature of these circumstances, some may or may not be present at any one time in any one scheme. 95. The issue of the CPS is a capital raising transaction which St.George advised was undertaken to complete the replacement of Tier 1 funding previously provided by the PRYMES and to return St.George's Tier 1 Capital to within the range required by APRA. There is nothing in the Terms which would suggest it was entered into for the purpose (which is not merely an incidental purpose) of enabling the relevant taxpayer to obtain an imputation benefit under the scheme. 96. Based on the information provided, and having regard to the factors listed in subsection 177EA(17) of the ITAA 1936, the qualifications set out in this Ruling and the relevant circumstances of the scheme, it would not be reasonable to conclude that in entering into the scheme, St.George and/or the Holders of the CPS demonstrate the objective purpose of securing imputation benefits for the Holders of the CPS. To the extent that any imputation benefits are secured, those benefits are considered to be incidental to the more significant objective purposes of the raising of Tier 1 Capital by St.George to meet its capital adequacy requirements. 97. Accordingly, the Commissioner will not make a determination under paragraph 177EA(5)(b) of the ITAA 1936 that would deny the imputation benefits to the Holders of CPS. | Gross-up and tax offset denied in certain circumstances: 98. Subdivision 207-F of the ITAA 1997 creates the appropriate adjustment to cancel the effect of the gross-up and tax offset rules where the entity concerned has manipulated the imputation system in a manner that is not permitted under the income tax law. 99. Section 207-145 of the ITAA 1997 provides the circumstances that must exist before this adjustment can occur. Pursuant to subsection 207-145(1) of the ITAA 1997 a 'manipulation of the imputation system' may occur where: 100. A person is a 'qualified person' for the purposes of Division 1A of former Part IIIAA of the ITAA 1936 if, generally speaking, they satisfy the holding period rule and the related payments rule (see former section 160APHO of the ITAA 1936). 101. The holding period rule applies where no related payment has, or will be made, in respect of the dividend, and requires the shares to have been continuously held at risk throughout the primary qualification period: former paragraph 160APHO(1)(a) of the ITAA 1936. 102. The related payments rule applies where the taxpayer or an associate, has made or will make, a related payment in respect of the dividend and requires the shares to have been continuously held at risk throughout the secondary qualification period: former subsection 160APHO(1) of the ITAA 1936 and former section 160APHN of the ITAA 1936. 103. The Holders of CPS are qualified persons, as: 104. The Commissioner has confirmed that he will not make a determination under paragraph 177EA(5)(b) of the ITAA 1936 or paragraph 204-30(3)(c) of the ITAA 1997 to deny the imputation benefits attached to Dividends paid by St.George to Holders of CPS. 105. A distribution will be taken to be made as part of a dividend stripping operation, pursuant to section 207-155 of the ITAA 1997, where the distribution arose out of, or was made in the course of, a scheme or substantially similar arrangement that was in the nature of dividend stripping. The Transaction Documents provide no indication that the offering of CPS and the associated payment of franked Dividends to the Holders in any way constitute a dividend stripping arrangement. As such, the dividend stripping provision will have no application to Holders of CPS. 106. Accordingly, section 207-145 of the ITAA 1997 will not apply to deny imputation benefits to Holders of CPS, as the requisite manipulation of the imputation system in respect of Dividends paid by St.George does not exist. | Franking credit subject to the refundable tax offset rules: 107. Holders of CPS who are entitled to a tax offset under subsection 207-20(2) of the ITAA 1997 in respect of the grossing-up of their dividend receipts will also be subject to the refundable tax offset rules contained in Division 67 of the ITAA 1997, unless specifically excluded under subsections 67-25(1A) to (1D) of the ITAA 1997 and not being an exception to the excluded entities. 108. The refundable tax offset rules ensure that taxpayers are entitled to a refund, once their available tax offsets have been utilised to reduce any income tax liability to nil. 109. Accordingly, Holders of CPS will be subject to the refundable tax offset rules unless they are listed as specifically excluded entities under section 67-25 of the ITAA 1997, and not excepted from the exclusion. Entities excluded by Division 67 of the ITAA 1997 include corporate tax entities (such as companies, corporate limited partnerships, corporate unit trusts and public trading trusts), unless they satisfy the requisite conditions as set out in subsection 67-25(1C) or subsection 67-25(1D) of the ITAA 1997. | Conversion of each CPS and allotment of additional St.George Ordinary Shares - CGT implications: 110. Pursuant to the Transaction, one CPS will Convert into one Ordinary Share through a variation of the rights attaching to each CPS. Holders of the CPS may also receive an allotment of additional St.George Ordinary Shares. 111. The CPS will Convert into St.George Ordinary Shares on 20 August 2012, subject to the satisfaction of the Mandatory Conversion Conditions. If the Mandatory Conversion Conditions are not satisfied on that date, the Mandatory Conversion Date moves to the next Dividend Payment Date on which the conditions are satisfied. The CPS may Convert earlier if St.George elects to Convert CPS into Ordinary Shares following the occurrence of certain events defined in the Terms. 112. For capital gains tax purposes, no CGT event will happen as a result of either the Conversion of CPS or the allotment of additional Ordinary Shares to the Holders. 113. The Conversion of CPS does not constitute a disposal, or an ending of ownership, of an asset or part of an asset as required for a CGT event to occur. 114. Shares are comprised of a bundle of rights; however those rights are not separate pieces of property capable of being divided out and held separately. Accordingly, the rights attaching to shares do not constitute individual assets as defined by section 108-5 of the ITAA 1997, but rather combine to make up the ultimate asset, being the share for CGT purposes: refer to Taxation Ruling TR 94/30. 115. Under section 104-25 of the ITAA 1997, CGT event C2 happens if, among other things, the ownership of an intangible asset, such as a preference share, ends by the share: 116. The mere variation of rights attaching to the CPS is not a 'redemption' or 'cancellation' of the share for the purposes of paragraph 104-25(1)(a) of the ITAA 1997 and does not involve the conversion of the CPS into equity interests for the purposes of paragraph 104-25(1)(f) of the ITAA 1997. 117. Furthermore, the relinquishment by the Holders of some of the rights attaching to the CPS is not a CGT event that happens to part of the CGT asset comprised by each CPS under section 112-30 of the ITAA 1997 (see Taxation Ruling TR 94/30, paragraph 40). 118. Although CGT event C2 does not happen as a result of the variation of the rights attaching to the CPS, the receipt of money or other consideration in respect of such a variation may attract the operation of CGT event H2 (see Taxation Ruling 94/30, paragraphs 9 and 46 to 48). 119. Subsection 104-155(1) of the ITAA 1997 provides that CGT event H2 happens if an act, transaction or event occurs in relation to a CGT asset that you own and the act, transaction or event does not result in an adjustment being made to the asset's cost base or reduced cost base. 120. The Conversion of CPS and allotment of additional St.George Ordinary Shares will result in an adjustment to the cost base and reduced cost base of the CPS under Subdivision 130-A of the ITAA 1997 (refer to paragraphs 126 to 131 of this Ruling). Accordingly, there is no act, transaction or event that happens in relation to the CPS that does not result in an adjustment to that CPS's cost base and reduced cost base. Therefore, CGT event H2 does not happen as a result of the Conversion of CPS and the potential allotment of additional Ordinary Shares. 121. It follows from the above that no CGT event happens as a result of the Conversion. | Allotment of additional St.George Ordinary Shares - dividend: 122. Subsection 6(1) of the ITAA 1936 defines a dividend to include any distribution made by a company to any of its shareholders, whether in money or other property, and any amount credited by a company to any of its shareholders as shareholders. 123. Although the additional St.George Ordinary Shares issued will constitute 'property' in the hands of the Holder, the allotment is not a disposition of property in the ordinary meaning of that expression (refer Ord Forrest Pty Ltd v. FC of T (1974) 130 CLR 124; 74 ATC 4034; (1974) 4 ATR 230). As there is no disposition there cannot be a distribution of property by St.George. 124. Furthermore, no amount is credited to the Holders, nor is an amount paid out of profits. 125. Accordingly, the allotment of additional St.George Ordinary Shares does not constitute a dividend within the meaning of subsection 6(1) of the ITAA 1936. | Cost base of the additional Ordinary Shares: 126. Either section 6BA of the ITAA 1936 or Subdivision 130-A of the ITAA 1997 will apply to apportion the first element of the cost base and reduced cost base of the CPS over the Converted CPS and any additional St.George Ordinary Shares issued by St.George. 127. Section 6BA of the ITAA 1936 applies if a shareholder holds shares in a company (the original shares) and the company issues other shares (the bonus shares) in respect of the original shares. 128. Pursuant to subsection 6BA(3) of ITAA 1936, as the additional St.George Ordinary Shares are issued to Holders for no consideration and are not a dividend or taken to be a dividend, the issue price of the CPS (being $100 per CPS) will be apportioned over the Converted CPS and any additional St.George Ordinary Shares allotted. 129. Subdivision 130-A of the ITAA 1997 applies in a similar manner in respect of shares that are CGT assets. It provides special rules relating to the time of acquisition and the cost base of bonus equities for capital gains tax purposes. 130. Section 130-20 of the ITAA 1997 sets out what happens if an entity owns shares in a company (the original equities) and the company issues other shares (the bonus equities) in relation to the original equities. 131. Pursuant to item 1 of the table in subsection 130-20(3) of the ITAA 1997, as the additional shares are not a dividend nor taken to be a dividend, the first element of the cost base and reduced cost base of each CPS is to be apportioned over both the Converted CPS and any additional Ordinary Shares issued to the Holders by St.George. | Date of acquisition of the additional Ordinary Shares: 132. The additional Ordinary Shares are deemed to be acquired at the time when the CPS were originally acquired by the Holders, being 19 December 2006. | Section 45: 133. Section 45 of the ITAA 1936 applies where a company streams the provision of shares and the payment of minimally franked dividends to its shareholders in such a way that the shares are received by some shareholders and minimally franked dividends are received by other shareholders. Minimally franked dividends are dividends which are franked to less than 10%. 134. St.George has consistently paid fully franked dividends and intends to continue paying fully franked dividends to all its shareholders into the foreseeable future. Based on the information provided and having regard to the circumstances of the Arrangement, section 45 of the ITAA 1936 will not apply to the allotment of additional Ordinary Shares. | Section 45A: 135. Section 45A of the ITAA 1936 applies in circumstances where capital benefits are streamed to certain shareholders who derive a greater benefit from the receipt of capital (the advantaged shareholders) and it is reasonable to assume that the other shareholders have received or will receive dividends (the disadvantaged shareholders). 136. The allotment of additional Ordinary Shares to Holders is a provision of capital benefits pursuant to paragraph 45A(3)(a) of the ITAA 1936. 137. The allotment of additional Ordinary Shares is in effect a restatement of the Holders' interest in the capital of St.George. Without more, it does not constitute the streaming of capital benefits. 138. Accordingly, it cannot be said that Holders derive a greater benefit from capital benefits than other St.George shareholders. Therefore, the allotment of additional Ordinary Shares does not trigger the application of section 45A of the ITAA 1936. | Section 45B: 139. Section 45B of the ITAA 1936 applies where certain capital benefits are provided to shareholders in substitution for dividends. 140. The allotment of additional Ordinary Shares to Holders is a provision of capital benefits pursuant to paragraph 45B(5)(c) of the ITAA 1936. 141. For the provision to apply, among other things, paragraph 45B(2)(c) of the ITAA 1936 requires that, having regard to the relevant circumstances of the scheme, it would be concluded that the person, or one of the persons, entered into the scheme or carried out the scheme or any part of the scheme for a purpose, other than an incidental purpose, of enabling a taxpayer to obtain a tax benefit. A non-exhaustive list of relevant circumstances of the scheme are provided in subsection 45B(8) of the ITAA 1936. 142. Having regard to the relevant circumstances surrounding the issue of the CPS, it cannot be concluded that St.George, the Holders or any other person entered into or carried out the issue of the CPS for the purpose of enabling the Holders to obtain a tax benefit. The Terms do not disclose that the additional Ordinary Shares allotted will be issued in substitution for any dividend payment on the CPS. Further, the allotment of additional Ordinary Shares cannot be said to be attributable to the profits of the company. 143. Accordingly, the allotment of additional St.George Ordinary Shares will not trigger the application of section 45B of the ITAA 1936. 144. The following is a detailed contents list for this Ruling: Not previously issued as a draft

Ruling: Acquisition time of the CPS: 59. For capital gains tax purposes, pursuant to section 109-10 of the ITAA 1997, each Holder acquired the CPS on 19 December 2006, being the date the CPS were allotted to them. | CPS cost base and reduced cost base: 60. For capital gains tax purposes, pursuant to subsections 110-25(2) and 110-55(2) of the ITAA 1997, the first element of the cost base and reduced cost base of each CPS is $100. | Inclusion of Dividends in assessable income: 61. Holders of CPS must include in their assessable income all Dividends received in respect of their CPS under subparagraph 44(1)(a)(i) of the ITAA 1936, and an amount equal to the franking credit received on those Dividends under Division 207 of the ITAA 1997. | Entitlement to a tax offset: 62. Holders will be entitled to a tax offset equal to the franking credit received on the Dividends under subsection 207-20(2) of the ITAA 1997. | Anti-avoidance provisions - imputation benefits: 63. The Commissioner will not make a determination under paragraph 204-30(3)(c) of the ITAA 1997 to deny the whole, or any part, of the imputation benefits received in relation to the Dividends received by the Holders of the CPS. 64. The Commissioner will not make a determination under paragraph 177EA(5)(b) of the ITAA 1936 to deny the whole, or any part, of the imputation benefits received in relation to the Dividends received by the Holders of the CPS. | Gross-up and tax offset denied in certain circumstances: 65. Section 207-145 of the ITAA 1997 will not apply to the whole, or any part, of the Dividends received by the Holders of the CPS. Accordingly, section 207-145 will not adjust the gross-up of the Holders' assessable income to exclude the franking credit, nor will it deny the tax offset to which the Holders would have otherwise been entitled. | Franking credit subject to the refundable tax offset rules: 66. Holders of CPS who are entitled to a tax offset under Division 207 of the ITAA 1997, in respect of franking credits received, will also be subject to the refundable tax offset rules in Division 67 of the ITAA 1997, unless specifically excluded under section 67-25 of the ITAA 1997 and who are not excepted from the exclusion. Such excluded entities include certain trustees and corporate tax entities under subsections 67-25(1A) to (1D) of the ITAA 1997. | Conversion of each CPS and allotment of additional St.George Ordinary Shares - capital gains tax (CGT) implications: 67. No CGT event happens as result of either the Conversion of each CPS or the allotment of additional Ordinary shares. | Allotment of additional St.George Ordinary Shares - dividend: 68. The allotment of additional St.George Ordinary Shares on Conversion of the CPS will not be assessable as dividend income in the hands of the Holders. | Cost base of the Ordinary Shares: 69. Either section 6BA of the ITAA 1936 or Subdivision 130-A of the ITAA 1997 will apply to apportion the first element of the cost base and reduced cost base of each CPS over the Converted CPS and any additional St.George Ordinary Shares issued by St.George. | Date of acquisition of the additional Ordinary Shares: 70. The additional Ordinary Shares are taken to be acquired at the time the CPS were originally acquired by the Holders, being 19 December 2006. | Anti-avoidance provisions - additional Ordinary Shares: 71. The value of the additional St.George Ordinary Shares at either the Mandatory Conversion Date or Exchange Date will not be treated as an unfranked dividend under section 45 of the ITAA 1936. 72. The Commissioner will not make a determination under subsection 45A(2) of the ITAA 1936 to the effect that the whole or part of the capital benefit is an unfranked dividend in the hands of the Holders of the CPS. 73. The Commissioner will not make a determination under subsection 45B(3) of the ITAA 1936 to the effect that the whole or part of the capital benefit is an unfranked dividend in the hands of the Holders of the CPS. Commissioner of Taxation 10 January 2007


Appendix: Acquisition time of the CPS: 74. An equity interest that is issued or allotted by a company, is acquired when the contract is entered into or, if no contract exists, when the equity interests are issued or allotted: item 2 in the table in section 109-10 of the ITAA 1997. 75. Under the CPS Prospectus, the CPS offer opened on 16 November 2006 and had a staggered close in respect of the Securityholder Offer and Broker Firm Offer. St.George could withdraw or cancel the offer at any time before the allotment date of 19 December 2006. The CPS were allotted on 19 December 2006. 76. For the purposes of item 2 of the table contained in section 109-10 of the ITAA 1997, the CPS were acquired on 19 December 2006. | CPS cost base and reduced cost base: 77. The first element of the cost base and reduced cost base includes the money paid, or required to be paid, in respect of acquiring a CGT asset: paragraph 110-25(2)(a) and subsection 110-55(2) of the ITAA 1997. 78. The Issue Price of the CPS is $100 per CPS. Accordingly, when CPS are allotted, the first element of the cost base and reduced cost base of each CPS is $100. | Inclusion of Dividends in assessable income: 79. Subsection 44(1) of the ITAA 1936 requires, among other things, that the assessable income of a resident shareholder in a company includes dividends that are paid to the shareholder by the company out of profits derived by it from any source. 80. St.George advise the Dividends paid in respect of CPS will be paid out of the retained profits of St.George. Accordingly, the Holders of CPS must include the Dividend amount in their assessable income. | Inclusion of franking credits in assessable income: 81. St.George advise that it expects the Dividends paid in respect of the CPS to be fully franked. Under the Australian imputation system, where a franked distribution is paid by an Australian resident company to a shareholder, the assessable income of the shareholder must also include the franking credit attached to the dividend under Division 207 of the ITAA 1997. The inclusion of both the dividend and the associated franking credit in a shareholder's assessable income is termed 'grossing-up' the dividend receipt. 82. Accordingly, the franking credits attached to the Dividends received by the Holders of CPS must be included in their assessable income. | Entitlement to a tax offset: 83. In accordance with subsection 207-20(2) of the ITAA 1997, and with respect to the 'grossing-up' of the dividend receipt, the Holders are entitled to receive a tax offset equal to the value of the franking credit which has been included in their assessable income. | Section 204-30: 84. Subdivision 204-D of the ITAA 1997 broadly enables the Commissioner to make a determination where distributions with attached imputation benefits are streamed to members of a corporate tax entity. 85. Section 204-30 of the ITAA 1997 prescribes the circumstances that are required to exist before the Commissioner may make such a determination. Section 204-30 applies where an entity 'streams' the payment of distributions in such a way that: 86. The existence of these conditions enables the Commissioner, under paragraph 204-30(3)(c) of the ITAA 1997, to make a determination that no imputation benefit is to arise in respect of the distributions made to those favoured members. 87. Streaming is not defined for the purposes of Subdivision 204-D of the ITAA 1997, however, it is understood to refer to a company selectively directing the flow of franked distributions to those members who can most benefit from the imputation credits: refer to paragraph 3.28 of the Explanatory Memorandum to the New Business Tax System (Imputation) Bill 2002. 88. St.George have indicated in the CPS Prospectus that Dividends paid to the Holders are expected to be fully franked. Although the CPS rank ahead of Ordinary Shares in respect of the payment of Dividends, St.George have advised that they have, and will continue, to pay fully franked dividends (to the extent of available franking credits in their franking account) to all of its shareholders, including shareholders of Ordinary Shares. There will be no change in St.George's dividend franking policy or dividend payout ratios on its share capital as a result of the issue of the CPS. 89. As such, there is no evidence that the requisite element of streaming exists in relation to the franked distributions to be paid by St.George to Holders of CPS. Accordingly, based on the information provided, the Commissioner will not make a determination under paragraph 204-30(3)(c) of the ITAA 1997 to deny imputation benefits to Holders of CPS. | Section 177EA: 90. Section 177EA of the ITAA 1936 is a general anti-avoidance provision that applies where one of the purposes (other than an incidental purpose) of the scheme is to obtain an imputation benefit. Where these circumstances arise, subsection 177EA(5) enables the Commissioner to make a determination with the effect of either: 91. Pursuant to subsection 177EA(3) of the ITAA 1936, this provision applies if the following conditions are satisfied: 92. It is considered that the conditions in paragraphs 177EA(3)(a) to (d) of the ITAA 1936 are satisfied because: 93. Accordingly, the issue is whether having regard to the relevant circumstances of the scheme, it would be concluded that it was entered into or carried out for the purpose (which is not merely an incidental purpose) of enabling the relevant taxpayer to obtain an imputation benefit under the scheme. 94. Circumstances which are relevant in determining whether any person has the requisite purpose include, but are not limited to, the factors listed in subsection 177EA(17) of the ITAA 1936. The relevant circumstances listed encompass a range of circumstances which taken individually or collectively could indicate the requisite purpose. Due to the diverse nature of these circumstances, some may or may not be present at any one time in any one scheme. 95. The issue of the CPS is a capital raising transaction which St.George advised was undertaken to complete the replacement of Tier 1 funding previously provided by the PRYMES and to return St.George's Tier 1 Capital to within the range required by APRA. There is nothing in the Terms which would suggest it was entered into for the purpose (which is not merely an incidental purpose) of enabling the relevant taxpayer to obtain an imputation benefit under the scheme. 96. Based on the information provided, and having regard to the factors listed in subsection 177EA(17) of the ITAA 1936, the qualifications set out in this Ruling and the relevant circumstances of the scheme, it would not be reasonable to conclude that in entering into the scheme, St.George and/or the Holders of the CPS demonstrate the objective purpose of securing imputation benefits for the Holders of the CPS. To the extent that any imputation benefits are secured, those benefits are considered to be incidental to the more significant objective purposes of the raising of Tier 1 Capital by St.George to meet its capital adequacy requirements. 97. Accordingly, the Commissioner will not make a determination under paragraph 177EA(5)(b) of the ITAA 1936 that would deny the imputation benefits to the Holders of CPS. | Gross-up and tax offset denied in certain circumstances: 98. Subdivision 207-F of the ITAA 1997 creates the appropriate adjustment to cancel the effect of the gross-up and tax offset rules where the entity concerned has manipulated the imputation system in a manner that is not permitted under the income tax law. 99. Section 207-145 of the ITAA 1997 provides the circumstances that must exist before this adjustment can occur. Pursuant to subsection 207-145(1) of the ITAA 1997 a 'manipulation of the imputation system' may occur where: 100. A person is a 'qualified person' for the purposes of Division 1A of former Part IIIAA of the ITAA 1936 if, generally speaking, they satisfy the holding period rule and the related payments rule (see former section 160APHO of the ITAA 1936). 101. The holding period rule applies where no related payment has, or will be made, in respect of the dividend, and requires the shares to have been continuously held at risk throughout the primary qualification period: former paragraph 160APHO(1)(a) of the ITAA 1936. 102. The related payments rule applies where the taxpayer or an associate, has made or will make, a related payment in respect of the dividend and requires the shares to have been continuously held at risk throughout the secondary qualification period: former subsection 160APHO(1) of the ITAA 1936 and former section 160APHN of the ITAA 1936. 103. The Holders of CPS are qualified persons, as: 104. The Commissioner has confirmed that he will not make a determination under paragraph 177EA(5)(b) of the ITAA 1936 or paragraph 204-30(3)(c) of the ITAA 1997 to deny the imputation benefits attached to Dividends paid by St.George to Holders of CPS. 105. A distribution will be taken to be made as part of a dividend stripping operation, pursuant to section 207-155 of the ITAA 1997, where the distribution arose out of, or was made in the course of, a scheme or substantially similar arrangement that was in the nature of dividend stripping. The Transaction Documents provide no indication that the offering of CPS and the associated payment of franked Dividends to the Holders in any way constitute a dividend stripping arrangement. As such, the dividend stripping provision will have no application to Holders of CPS. 106. Accordingly, section 207-145 of the ITAA 1997 will not apply to deny imputation benefits to Holders of CPS, as the requisite manipulation of the imputation system in respect of Dividends paid by St.George does not exist. | Franking credit subject to the refundable tax offset rules: 107. Holders of CPS who are entitled to a tax offset under subsection 207-20(2) of the ITAA 1997 in respect of the grossing-up of their dividend receipts will also be subject to the refundable tax offset rules contained in Division 67 of the ITAA 1997, unless specifically excluded under subsections 67-25(1A) to (1D) of the ITAA 1997 and not being an exception to the excluded entities. 108. The refundable tax offset rules ensure that taxpayers are entitled to a refund, once their available tax offsets have been utilised to reduce any income tax liability to nil. 109. Accordingly, Holders of CPS will be subject to the refundable tax offset rules unless they are listed as specifically excluded entities under section 67-25 of the ITAA 1997, and not excepted from the exclusion. Entities excluded by Division 67 of the ITAA 1997 include corporate tax entities (such as companies, corporate limited partnerships, corporate unit trusts and public trading trusts), unless they satisfy the requisite conditions as set out in subsection 67-25(1C) or subsection 67-25(1D) of the ITAA 1997. | Conversion of each CPS and allotment of additional St.George Ordinary Shares - CGT implications: 110. Pursuant to the Transaction, one CPS will Convert into one Ordinary Share through a variation of the rights attaching to each CPS. Holders of the CPS may also receive an allotment of additional St.George Ordinary Shares. 111. The CPS will Convert into St.George Ordinary Shares on 20 August 2012, subject to the satisfaction of the Mandatory Conversion Conditions. If the Mandatory Conversion Conditions are not satisfied on that date, the Mandatory Conversion Date moves to the next Dividend Payment Date on which the conditions are satisfied. The CPS may Convert earlier if St.George elects to Convert CPS into Ordinary Shares following the occurrence of certain events defined in the Terms. 112. For capital gains tax purposes, no CGT event will happen as a result of either the Conversion of CPS or the allotment of additional Ordinary Shares to the Holders. 113. The Conversion of CPS does not constitute a disposal, or an ending of ownership, of an asset or part of an asset as required for a CGT event to occur. 114. Shares are comprised of a bundle of rights; however those rights are not separate pieces of property capable of being divided out and held separately. Accordingly, the rights attaching to shares do not constitute individual assets as defined by section 108-5 of the ITAA 1997, but rather combine to make up the ultimate asset, being the share for CGT purposes: refer to Taxation Ruling TR 94/30. 115. Under section 104-25 of the ITAA 1997, CGT event C2 happens if, among other things, the ownership of an intangible asset, such as a preference share, ends by the share: 116. The mere variation of rights attaching to the CPS is not a 'redemption' or 'cancellation' of the share for the purposes of paragraph 104-25(1)(a) of the ITAA 1997 and does not involve the conversion of the CPS into equity interests for the purposes of paragraph 104-25(1)(f) of the ITAA 1997. 117. Furthermore, the relinquishment by the Holders of some of the rights attaching to the CPS is not a CGT event that happens to part of the CGT asset comprised by each CPS under section 112-30 of the ITAA 1997 (see Taxation Ruling TR 94/30, paragraph 40). 118. Although CGT event C2 does not happen as a result of the variation of the rights attaching to the CPS, the receipt of money or other consideration in respect of such a variation may attract the operation of CGT event H2 (see Taxation Ruling 94/30, paragraphs 9 and 46 to 48). 119. Subsection 104-155(1) of the ITAA 1997 provides that CGT event H2 happens if an act, transaction or event occurs in relation to a CGT asset that you own and the act, transaction or event does not result in an adjustment being made to the asset's cost base or reduced cost base. 120. The Conversion of CPS and allotment of additional St.George Ordinary Shares will result in an adjustment to the cost base and reduced cost base of the CPS under Subdivision 130-A of the ITAA 1997 (refer to paragraphs 126 to 131 of this Ruling). Accordingly, there is no act, transaction or event that happens in relation to the CPS that does not result in an adjustment to that CPS's cost base and reduced cost base. Therefore, CGT event H2 does not happen as a result of the Conversion of CPS and the potential allotment of additional Ordinary Shares. 121. It follows from the above that no CGT event happens as a result of the Conversion. | Allotment of additional St.George Ordinary Shares - dividend: 122. Subsection 6(1) of the ITAA 1936 defines a dividend to include any distribution made by a company to any of its shareholders, whether in money or other property, and any amount credited by a company to any of its shareholders as shareholders. 123. Although the additional St.George Ordinary Shares issued will constitute 'property' in the hands of the Holder, the allotment is not a disposition of property in the ordinary meaning of that expression (refer Ord Forrest Pty Ltd v. FC of T (1974) 130 CLR 124; 74 ATC 4034; (1974) 4 ATR 230). As there is no disposition there cannot be a distribution of property by St.George. 124. Furthermore, no amount is credited to the Holders, nor is an amount paid out of profits. 125. Accordingly, the allotment of additional St.George Ordinary Shares does not constitute a dividend within the meaning of subsection 6(1) of the ITAA 1936. | Cost base of the additional Ordinary Shares: 126. Either section 6BA of the ITAA 1936 or Subdivision 130-A of the ITAA 1997 will apply to apportion the first element of the cost base and reduced cost base of the CPS over the Converted CPS and any additional St.George Ordinary Shares issued by St.George. 127. Section 6BA of the ITAA 1936 applies if a shareholder holds shares in a company (the original shares) and the company issues other shares (the bonus shares) in respect of the original shares. 128. Pursuant to subsection 6BA(3) of ITAA 1936, as the additional St.George Ordinary Shares are issued to Holders for no consideration and are not a dividend or taken to be a dividend, the issue price of the CPS (being $100 per CPS) will be apportioned over the Converted CPS and any additional St.George Ordinary Shares allotted. 129. Subdivision 130-A of the ITAA 1997 applies in a similar manner in respect of shares that are CGT assets. It provides special rules relating to the time of acquisition and the cost base of bonus equities for capital gains tax purposes. 130. Section 130-20 of the ITAA 1997 sets out what happens if an entity owns shares in a company (the original equities) and the company issues other shares (the bonus equities) in relation to the original equities. 131. Pursuant to item 1 of the table in subsection 130-20(3) of the ITAA 1997, as the additional shares are not a dividend nor taken to be a dividend, the first element of the cost base and reduced cost base of each CPS is to be apportioned over both the Converted CPS and any additional Ordinary Shares issued to the Holders by St.George. | Date of acquisition of the additional Ordinary Shares: 132. The additional Ordinary Shares are deemed to be acquired at the time when the CPS were originally acquired by the Holders, being 19 December 2006. | Section 45: 133. Section 45 of the ITAA 1936 applies where a company streams the provision of shares and the payment of minimally franked dividends to its shareholders in such a way that the shares are received by some shareholders and minimally franked dividends are received by other shareholders. Minimally franked dividends are dividends which are franked to less than 10%. 134. St.George has consistently paid fully franked dividends and intends to continue paying fully franked dividends to all its shareholders into the foreseeable future. Based on the information provided and having regard to the circumstances of the Arrangement, section 45 of the ITAA 1936 will not apply to the allotment of additional Ordinary Shares. | Section 45A: 135. Section 45A of the ITAA 1936 applies in circumstances where capital benefits are streamed to certain shareholders who derive a greater benefit from the receipt of capital (the advantaged shareholders) and it is reasonable to assume that the other shareholders have received or will receive dividends (the disadvantaged shareholders). 136. The allotment of additional Ordinary Shares to Holders is a provision of capital benefits pursuant to paragraph 45A(3)(a) of the ITAA 1936. 137. The allotment of additional Ordinary Shares is in effect a restatement of the Holders' interest in the capital of St.George. Without more, it does not constitute the streaming of capital benefits. 138. Accordingly, it cannot be said that Holders derive a greater benefit from capital benefits than other St.George shareholders. Therefore, the allotment of additional Ordinary Shares does not trigger the application of section 45A of the ITAA 1936. | Section 45B: 139. Section 45B of the ITAA 1936 applies where certain capital benefits are provided to shareholders in substitution for dividends. 140. The allotment of additional Ordinary Shares to Holders is a provision of capital benefits pursuant to paragraph 45B(5)(c) of the ITAA 1936. 141. For the provision to apply, among other things, paragraph 45B(2)(c) of the ITAA 1936 requires that, having regard to the relevant circumstances of the scheme, it would be concluded that the person, or one of the persons, entered into the scheme or carried out the scheme or any part of the scheme for a purpose, other than an incidental purpose, of enabling a taxpayer to obtain a tax benefit. A non-exhaustive list of relevant circumstances of the scheme are provided in subsection 45B(8) of the ITAA 1936. 142. Having regard to the relevant circumstances surrounding the issue of the CPS, it cannot be concluded that St.George, the Holders or any other person entered into or carried out the issue of the CPS for the purpose of enabling the Holders to obtain a tax benefit. The Terms do not disclose that the additional Ordinary Shares allotted will be issued in substitution for any dividend payment on the CPS. Further, the allotment of additional Ordinary Shares cannot be said to be attributable to the profits of the company. 143. Accordingly, the allotment of additional St.George Ordinary Shares will not trigger the application of section 45B of the ITAA 1936.


What this Ruling is about | NOT LEGALLY BINDING SECTION: | A public ruling is an expression of the Commissioner's opinion about the way in which a relevant provision applies, or would apply, to entities generally or to a class of entities in relation to a particular scheme or a class of schemes. | If you rely on this ruling, we must apply the law to you in the way set out in the ruling (or in a way that is more favourable for you if we are satisfied that the ruling is incorrect and disadvantages you, and we are not prevented from doing so by a time limit imposed by the law). You will be protected from having to pay any underpaid tax, penalty or interest in respect of the matters covered by this ruling if it turns out that it does not correctly state how the relevant provision applies to you. | Dividend Rate x Face Value x N | Appendix 2 - Detailed contents list


Related rulings: TR 94/30
Legislative references: ITAA 1936 6(1) ITAA 1936 6BA ITAA 1936 6BA(3) ITAA 1936 44(1) ITAA 1936 44(1)(a)(i) ITAA 1936 45 ITAA 1936 45A ITAA 1936 45A(2) ITAA 1936 45A(3)(a) ITAA 1936 45B ITAA 1936 45B(2)(c) ITAA 1936 45B(3) ITAA 1936 45B(5)(c) ITAA 1936 45B(8) ITAA 1936 46H ITAA 1936 46I ITAA 1936 Pt IIIAA Div 1A ITAA 1936 160APHJ ITAA 1936 160APHM ITAA 1936 160APHN ITAA 1936 160APHO ITAA 1936 160APHO(1) ITAA 1936 160APHO(1)(a) ITAA 1936 160APHO(2) ITAA 1936 160APHO(3) ITAA 1936 177EA ITAA 1936 177EA(3) ITAA 1936 177EA(3)(a) ITAA 1936 177EA(3)(b) ITAA 1936 177EA(3)(c) ITAA 1936 177EA(3)(d) ITAA 1936 177EA(5) ITAA 1936 177EA(5)(b) ITAA 1936 177EA(14)(a) ITAA 1936 177EA(17) ITAA 1997 Div 67 ITAA 1997 67-25 ITAA 1997 67-25(1A) ITAA 1997 67-25(1B) ITAA 1997 67-25(1C) ITAA 1997 67-25(1D) ITAA 1997 Div 104 ITAA 1997 104-25 ITAA 1997 104-25(1)(a) ITAA 1997 104-25(1)(f) ITAA 1997 104-155 ITAA 1997 104-155(1) ITAA 1997 108-5 ITAA 1997 109-10 ITAA 1997 110-25 ITAA 1997 110-25(2) ITAA 1997 110-25(2)(a) ITAA 1997 110-55 ITAA 1997 110-55(2) ITAA 1997 112-30 ITAA 1997 Subdiv 130-A ITAA 1997 130-20 ITAA 1997 130-20(3) ITAA 1997 Subdiv 197-A ITAA 1997 202-40 ITAA 1997 202-45 ITAA 1997 Subdiv 204-D ITAA 1997 204-30 ITAA 1997 204-30(1)(a) ITAA 1997 204-30(1)(b) ITAA 1997 204-30(1)(c) ITAA 1997 204-30(3)(c) ITAA 1997 Div 207 ITAA 1997 207-20 ITAA 1997 207-20(2) ITAA 1997 Subdiv 207-F ITAA 1997 207-145 ITAA 1997 207-145(1) ITAA 1997 207-145(1)(a) ITAA 1997 207-145(1)(b) ITAA 1997 207-145(1)(c) ITAA 1997 207-145(1)(d) ITAA 1997 207-155 ITAA 1997 960-130 ITAA 1997 960-135 ITAA 1997 Div 974 TAA 1953 Sch 1 357-75(1) Copyright Act 1968 Corporations Act 2001
Case references: Ord Forrest Pty Ltd v. FC of T (1974) 130 CLR 124 74 ATC 4034 (1974) 4 ATR 230
Subject references: acquisition dates capital gains tax CGT cost base conversion of securities dividend imputation franking rebates preference shares