Product Ruling PR 2023/26
Date of effect: 13 December 2023

What this ruling is about: 1. This Ruling sets out the fringe benefits tax and income tax consequences for an employer (Employer) that enters into the Luxury Escapes Business Traveller Program (LE Business Traveller Program) offered by Luxury Escapes Business Traveller Pty Ltd (Luxury Escapes). 2. All legislative references in this Ruling are to the Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986, unless otherwise indicated. Terms which are defined in the draft User Business Agreement referred to in paragraph 10 of this Ruling have been capitalised. 3. This Ruling does not address: Who this Ruling applies to 4. This Ruling applies to you if you, as the Employer, enter into the scheme described in paragraphs 10 to 20 of this Ruling on or after 13 December 2023 and on or before 30 June 2026. 5. This Ruling does not apply to you if you: 6. This Ruling applies from 13 December 2023, the date it was published, to the Employers specified in paragraph 4 of this Ruling that enter into the scheme from 13 December 2023 until 30 June 2026. 7. However, the Ruling only applies and may be relied on to the extent that there is no change in the scheme or in the entity's involvement in the scheme. If the scheme carried out is materially different from the scheme described at paragraphs 10 to 20 of this Ruling, this Ruling cannot be relied upon and may be withdrawn or modified. 8. Subject to paragraph 3 of this Ruling and the assumptions in paragraph 9 of this Ruling: Assumptions 9. This Ruling is made on the basis of the following necessary assumptions: 10. The scheme is identified and described in the following: Note: Certain information has been provided on a commercial-in-confidence basis and will not be disclosed or released under freedom of information legislation. 11. For the purposes of describing the scheme, there are no other agreements (whether formal or informal, and whether or not legally enforceable) which an Employer, or any associate of an Employer, will be a party to which are a part of the scheme. 12. All Australian Securities and Investments Commission requirements are, or will be, complied with for the term of the agreements. Overview of scheme 13. Luxury Escapes carries on an online travel agency business via a global luxury travel platform, offering products and services such as hotels, resorts, tours, flights, experiences and travel insurance provided for by third-party suppliers. 14. The LE Business Traveller Program is offered by Luxury Escapes to Employers, providing them the ability to set a travel budget in relation to business travel conducted by their Employees, and for those Employees to earn Luxury Escapes Credits in their personal Luxury Escapes accounts. 15. The LE Business Traveller Program works as follows: 16. The amount of Luxury Escapes Credits earned by the Employee is a percentage (the percentage set by the Employer) of the spend below the budget limit set by the Employer.

Class of entities or scheme: 13. Luxury Escapes carries on an online travel agency business via a global luxury travel platform, offering products and services such as hotels, resorts, tours, flights, experiences and travel insurance provided for by third-party suppliers. 14. The LE Business Traveller Program is offered by Luxury Escapes to Employers, providing them the ability to set a travel budget in relation to business travel conducted by their Employees, and for those Employees to earn Luxury Escapes Credits in their personal Luxury Escapes accounts. 15. The LE Business Traveller Program works as follows: 16. The amount of Luxury Escapes Credits earned by the Employee is a percentage (the percentage set by the Employer) of the spend below the budget limit set by the Employer.

Ruling: 1. This Ruling sets out the fringe benefits tax and income tax consequences for an employer (Employer) that enters into the Luxury Escapes Business Traveller Program (LE Business Traveller Program) offered by Luxury Escapes Business Traveller Pty Ltd (Luxury Escapes). 2. All legislative references in this Ruling are to the Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986, unless otherwise indicated. Terms which are defined in the draft User Business Agreement referred to in paragraph 10 of this Ruling have been capitalised. 3. This Ruling does not address: | Who this Ruling applies to: 4. This Ruling applies to you if you, as the Employer, enter into the scheme described in paragraphs 10 to 20 of this Ruling on or after 13 December 2023 and on or before 30 June 2026. 5. This Ruling does not apply to you if you: 6. This Ruling applies from 13 December 2023, the date it was published, to the Employers specified in paragraph 4 of this Ruling that enter into the scheme from 13 December 2023 until 30 June 2026. 7. However, the Ruling only applies and may be relied on to the extent that there is no change in the scheme or in the entity's involvement in the scheme. If the scheme carried out is materially different from the scheme described at paragraphs 10 to 20 of this Ruling, this Ruling cannot be relied upon and may be withdrawn or modified. 8. Subject to paragraph 3 of this Ruling and the assumptions in paragraph 9 of this Ruling: | Assumptions: 9. This Ruling is made on the basis of the following necessary assumptions: 10. The scheme is identified and described in the following: Note: Certain information has been provided on a commercial-in-confidence basis and will not be disclosed or released under freedom of information legislation. 11. For the purposes of describing the scheme, there are no other agreements (whether formal or informal, and whether or not legally enforceable) which an Employer, or any associate of an Employer, will be a party to which are a part of the scheme. 12. All Australian Securities and Investments Commission requirements are, or will be, complied with for the term of the agreements. | Overview of scheme: 13. Luxury Escapes carries on an online travel agency business via a global luxury travel platform, offering products and services such as hotels, resorts, tours, flights, experiences and travel insurance provided for by third-party suppliers. 14. The LE Business Traveller Program is offered by Luxury Escapes to Employers, providing them the ability to set a travel budget in relation to business travel conducted by their Employees, and for those Employees to earn Luxury Escapes Credits in their personal Luxury Escapes accounts. 15. The LE Business Traveller Program works as follows: 16. The amount of Luxury Escapes Credits earned by the Employee is a percentage (the percentage set by the Employer) of the spend below the budget limit set by the Employer.


Appendix: Fringe benefits tax consequences for the Employer under the Luxury Escapes Business Traveller Program: 21. Expense payment benefit is defined in subsection 136(1) by reference to a benefit referred to in section 20. Section 20 provides that an expense payment benefit is a payment made by a person (the provider) in discharge of the whole or part of an obligation of another person (the recipient) to pay a third person in respect of an amount of expenditure incurred by the recipient, or the reimbursement by the provider of the recipient in whole or part in respect of an amount of expenditure incurred by the recipient. 22. Expense payment fringe benefit is defined in subsection 136(1) to mean a fringe benefit that is an expense payment benefit. The definition of a fringe benefit is defined in subsection 136(1) and generally relates to a benefit: 23. Where the Employee (as the recipient for the purposes of section 20) incurs travel costs and expenditure in respect of Luxury Escapes Credits and the Employer (as the provider for the purposes of section 20), under the terms of the User Business Agreement, pays Luxury Escapes directly for these expenses, such payments will be an expense payment benefit provided to the Employee by the Employer in respect of the employment of the Employee. 24. The payment by the Employer to Luxury Escapes for the Employee's travel costs and the Luxury Escapes Credits will therefore constitute an expense payment fringe benefit, subject to their exclusion as a fringe benefit (by virtue of being an exempt benefit). 25. An expense payment fringe benefit covered by a no-private-use declaration in the approved form is an exempt benefit under section 20A. An employer may make a no-private-use declaration covering all expense payment fringe benefits in an FBT year for which the taxable value is nil. 26. Thus, the no-private-use declaration could be used by the Employer to cover expense payment fringe benefits relating to its payment of the Employee's travel costs for which the Employee could have claimed an income tax deduction (had the travel costs not been paid by the Employer). 27. Section 58P provides that a benefit is exempt if it is considered to be a minor benefit. Broadly speaking, the minor benefits exemption exempts benefits if the value of the benefit is less than $300 and it is considered unreasonable to treat the benefit as a fringe benefit having regard to the specified criteria in paragraph 58P(1)(f): 28. Taxation Ruling TR 2007/12 Fringe benefits tax: minor benefits contains comprehensive guidance on the application of the minor benefit exemption in section 58P and confirms that the section does not apply to exempt all benefits that have a notional taxable value of less than $300. TR 2007/12 provides that in considering the application of the exemption under section 58P it is necessary to look to the nature of the benefit provided and give due weight to each of the criteria in paragraph 58P(1)(f). The weight given to each criterion will also vary depending on the circumstances surrounding the provision of each benefit. 29. In relation to the criterion under subparagraph 58P(1)(f)(i), paragraph 22 of TR 2007/12 relevantly notes: 30. In relation to the criterion under subparagraph 58P(1)(f)(ii), paragraph 224 of TR 2007/12 relevantly notes that even if the value of each benefit is below the minor benefits threshold, the sum of the values of the benefits provided, being identical benefits in the current and previous year of tax and those that are reasonably expected to be provided in the future, are all taken into consideration. In the context of expense payment benefits provided by the Employer in respect of its payment for the Luxury Escapes Credits, the sum of the values of the benefits provided will vary on a case-by-case basis and can be influenced by factors such as the travel budget and the credit earning percentage set by the Employer, the choice of accommodation, flight or other made by the Employee and the length of the Employee's stay. 31. The Employer must therefore give due consideration to the 5 criteria stipulated in paragraph 58P(1)(f) against the individual facts and circumstances of each expense payment benefit it provides in respect of its payment for Luxury Escapes Credits. | Payments for Luxury Escapes Credits deductible: 32. Section 8-1 of the ITAA 1997 allows a deduction for any loss or outgoing to the extent that it is incurred in gaining or producing assessable income or it is necessarily incurred in carrying on a business for the purpose of gaining or producing assessable income, provided that the loss or outgoing is not of a capital, private or domestic nature. 33. An outgoing incurred by a business will be necessarily incurred where, in the circumstances, it is reasonably capable of being seen as desirable or appropriate from the point of view of the pursuit of the business ends of the business being carried on for the purpose of earning assessable income (see Magna Alloys & Research Pty Ltd v. Commissioner of Taxation of the Commonwealth of Australia [1980] FCA 180). 34. Where the Employer pays Luxury Escapes for any travel costs incurred by the Employee, or any Luxury Escapes Credits earned by the Employee, under the LE Business Traveller Program, the payment will constitute an outgoing which is appropriate from the point of view of the pursuit of the business ends of the Employer's business and therefore necessarily incurred in carrying on that business. 35. The payment necessarily incurred by the Employer to pay for travel costs or Luxury Escapes Credits in the course of carrying on its business is not of a capital, private or domestic nature and is deductible under section 8-1 of the ITAA 1997 in the income year the payment is made to Luxury Escapes (that is, at the time it is necessarily incurred). © AUSTRALIAN TAXATION OFFICE FOR THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute this material as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).


What this Ruling is about | Example  calculation of Luxury Escapes Credits | If this Ruling applies to you, and you correctly rely on it, we will apply the law to you in the way set out in this Ruling. That is, you will not pay any more tax or penalties or interest in respect of the matters covered by this Ruling. | This Ruling has been given on the basis that the entity who applied for the Ruling, and their associates, will abide by strict terms of use. Any failure to comply with the terms of use may lead to the withdrawal of this Ruling. | Potential participants must form their own view about the commercial and financial viability of the product. The Commissioner recommends a financial (or other) adviser be consulted for such information. | Example  calculation of Luxury Escapes Credits: 17. Company A (an employer) is a Business Account Holder which sets a limit of $300 per night for domestic business travel accommodation and sets the employee credit earning at 50% of the spend below budget. | 18. Athena (an employee of Company A with a User Account linked to Company A's Business Account, as well as a personal account) books a $200 per night hotel for 4 nights. | 19. As a result, Athena has spent $400 below the allocated accommodation budget for her business trip and earns $200 worth of Luxury Escapes Credits. | 20. Company A is charged $800 for Athena's accommodation choice and is charged $200 (being 50% of the $400 saving) for the $200 worth of Luxury Escapes Credits provided to Athena's personal Luxury Escapes account. | Commissioner of Taxation 13 December 2023 | Payment for Luxury Escapes Credits deductible | (e) the notional taxable value of the minor benefit in relation to the current year of tax is less than $300; and | (A) the minor benefit; or | (B) benefits provided in connection with the provision of the minor benefit; | have been or can reasonably be expected to be provided; | (ii) the amount that is, or might reasonably be expected to be, the sum of the notional taxable values of the minor benefit and any associated benefits, being benefits that are identical or similar to the minor benefit, in relation to the current year of tax or any other year of tax; | (iii) the amount that is, or might reasonably be expected to be, the sum of the notional taxable values of any other associated benefits in relation to the current year of tax or any other year of tax; | (A) if the minor benefit is not a car benefit - the minor benefit; and | (B) if there are any associated benefits that are not car benefits - those associated benefits; and | (A) whether the benefit concerned was provided to assist the employee to deal with an unexpected event; and | (B) whether the benefit concerned was provided otherwise than wholly or principally by way of a reward for services rendered, or to be rendered, by the employee; | it would be concluded that it would be unreasonable to treat the minor benefit as a fringe benefit in relation to the employer in relation to the current year of tax; | the minor benefit is an exempt benefit in relation to the current year of tax. | In applying the 'infrequency and irregularity' criterion, it is not appropriate to stipulate the maximum number of times associated benefits that are identical or similar to a minor benefit, or benefits in connection with the minor benefit, can be provided before the criterion is not met. However, the more often and regularly those benefits are provided, the less likely it is that this criterion would be met.


Related rulings: TR 2007/12
Legislative references: FBTAA 1986 20 FBTAA 1986 20A FBTAA 1986 58P FBTAA 1986 58P(1)(f) FBTAA 1986 58P(1)(f)(i) FBTAA 1986 58P(1)(f)(ii) FBTAA 1986 67 FBTAA 1986 136(1) ITAA 1936 Pt IVA ITAA 1997 8-1
Case references: Magna Alloys & Research Pty Ltd v. Commissioner of Taxation of the Commonwealth of Australia [1980] FCA 180 80 ATC 4542 11 ATR 276 49 FLR 183 33 ALR 213