Private ruling: Capital gains tax
Published: May 2013
Ruling period: Year ended 30 June 2011
Date scheme commenced: 1 July 2010

Ruling: Q1: Will the profit on the sale of the subdivided lots constitute assessable income under section 6-5 or section 15-5 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 ? | A1: No. | Q2: Will the capital gains tax (CGT) provisions in Parts 3-1 and 3-3 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 apply in relation to the sale of the subdivided lots? | A2: Yes.

Relevant facts and circumstances: This ruling is based on the facts stated in the description of the scheme that is set out below. If your circumstances are materially different from these facts, this ruling has no effect and you cannot rely on it. The fact sheet has more information about relying on your private ruling. You acquired land (House Block) prior to 20 September 1985. You intended to build the family home and provide some space for your future family and the possibility of running a few head of cattle as a hobby farm. You completed your home, and it has remained your principal place of residence. During the 1990's and 2000's you purchased a number of adjoining blocks. None of the blocks have been used for income producing purposes. You were looking towards retirement and wanted to downsize. You spoke to a real estate agent with the intention of selling the land as a whole. The agent suggested you speak to a land developer to maximise your proceeds from the sale. After discussions it was decided the land would be divided into a number of house blocks. This included your house. You entered into a development agreement with a developer whereby the developer is appointed to conduct all matters related to the development and the sale of the blocks. You will have no real involvement in the subdivision process which is being entirely managed by the developer.

Relevant legislative provisions: Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 6-5. | Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 15-15. | Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 104-10. | Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Subsection 104-10(5).

Reasons for decision: Summary: The proceeds from the sale of the subdivided blocks are not ordinary income and not assessable under sections 6-5 or 15-15 of the ITAA 1997. The proceeds represent a mere realisation of a capital asset which will fall for consideration under the CGT provisions in Part 3-1 of the ITAA 1997. However, only the blocks will be subject to CGT as they were purchased after 20 September 1985. The house block was acquired before 20 September 1985, and any capital gain or capital loss will also be disregarded for CGT purposes. | Detailed Reasoning - Income tax provisions: Under section 6-5 of the ITAA 1997, your assessable income includes the ordinary income you derived directly or indirectly from all sources, during the income year. Additionally, section 15-15 of the ITAA 1997 includes profit arising from the carrying on or carrying out of a profit-making undertaking or plan. However, this provision does not apply to a profit that is assessable as ordinary income under section 6-5 of the ITAA 1997, or which arises in respect of the sale of property acquired on or after 20 September 1985. Although the legislation does not define income according to ordinary concepts, a substantial body of case law has evolved to identify various factors that indicate the nature of ordinary income. In FC of T v The Myer Emporium (1987) 163 CLR 199; 87 ATC 4363; (1987) 18 ATR 693 ( Myer Emporium ), the Full High Court expressed the view that profits made by a taxpayer who enters into an isolated transaction with a profit making purpose can be assessable income. Taxation Ruling TR 92/3 considers the assessability of profits on isolated transactions in light of the principles outlined in Myer Emporium . According to Paragraph 1 of TR 92/3, the term isolated transactions refers to: · those transactions outside the ordinary course of business of a taxpayer carrying on a business, and · those transactions entered into by non business taxpayers. Paragraph 6 of TR 92/3 provides that a profit from an isolated transaction will generally be income when both the following elements are present: · your intention or purpose in entering into the transaction was to make a profit or gain, and · the transaction was entered into, and the profit was made, in the course of carrying on a business or in carrying out a business operation or commercial transaction. Additionally, if a taxpayer acquires an asset with the intention of using it for personal enjoyment but later decides to commit the asset, either: · as the capital of a business or · into a profit-making undertaking with the characteristics of a business operation or commercial transaction, this activity constitutes the carrying on of a business, or a business operation or commercial transaction. The profit from such activity is income even though the taxpayer did not have the purpose of profit-making at the time of acquiring the asset. Some of the factors to consider when looking at whether an isolated transaction amounts to a business operation or commercial transaction are listed at paragraph 13 of TR 92/3. They are: (a) the nature of the entity undertaking the operation or transaction (b) the nature and scale of other activities undertaken by the taxpayer (c) the amount of money involved in the operation or transaction and the magnitude of the profit sought or obtained (d) the nature, scale and complexity of the operation or transaction (e) the manner in which the operation or transaction was entered into or carried out (f) the nature of any connection between the relevant taxpayer and any other party to the operation or transaction (g) if the transaction involves the acquisition and disposal of property, the nature of that property and (h) the timing of the transaction or the various steps in the transaction. Profits on the sale of subdivided land can therefore be income according to ordinary concepts within section 6-5 of the ITAA 1997, or as a profit making undertaking or plan within section 15-15 of the ITAA 1997, if the taxpayer's subdivisional activities have become a separate business operation or commercial transaction, or an isolated profit making venture. In contrast, paragraph 36 of TR 92/3 notes that the courts have often said that a profit on the mere realisation of an investment is not income, even if the taxpayer goes about the realisation in an enterprising way. However, if a transaction satisfies the elements set out above it is generally not a mere realisation of an investment. In your case, you purchased the house block to build your family home, to provide space for your future family and for the possibility of running a hobby farm. You also purchased a number of adjoining blocks. The properties have never been used to produce assessable income. You have never been in the business of land development and you will have minimal involvement in the subdivision of the land. Therefore, the proceeds you receive from the development of your property are not ordinary income and not assessable under sections 6-5 or 15-15 of the ITAA 1997. The proceeds represent a mere realisation of a capital asset which will fall for consideration under the CGT provisions in Part 3-1 and 3-3 of the ITAA 1997. | Detailed Reasoning - CGT provisions: CGT event A1 in section 104-10 of the ITAA 1997, relating to the disposal of a CGT asset, will happen when you dispose of each subdivided block. Subsection 104-10(5) of the ITAA 1997, however, contains an exception, where any capital gain or capital loss made is disregarded if the asset was acquired before 20 September 1985. In your case, you acquired the original parcel of land prior to 20 September 1985. Therefore, any capital gain or capital loss you make will be disregarded for CGT purposes. However, the adjoining blocks were purchased after 20 September 1985. Subsection 104-10(4) of the ITAA 1997 provides that a capital gain will arise if the capital proceeds from the disposal are more than the asset's cost base and a capital loss will arise if the capital proceeds are less than the asset's reduced cost base.