Private ruling: Non-commercial losses
Date of advice: 29 November 2016
Published: April 2017
Ruling period: Year ended 30 June 20YY
Date scheme commenced: 1 July 20XX

Ruling: Q1: Will the Commissioner exercise the discretion in paragraph 35-55(1)(b) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997) to allow you to include any losses from your business activity in your calculation of taxable income for the 20YY financial year? | A1: No.

Relevant facts and circumstances: You satisfy the <$250,000 income requirement set out in subsection 35-10(2E) of the ITAA 1997. You carry on a business. You commenced business operations in the 20YY financial year. You did not make a profit or satisfy any of the objective tests as you had start-up costs, there were delays in obtaining the necessary licences and you needed to build up a client base. You intend to make $20,000 in assessable income in the 20ZZ financial year.

Relevant legislative provisions: Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 subsection 35-10(1) | Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 subsection 35-10(2) | Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 subsection 35-10(2E) | Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 subsection 35-30 | Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 paragraph 35-55(1)(b)

Reasons for decision: Summary: For the 2009-10 and later income years, Division 35 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 will apply to defer a non-commercial loss from a business activity unless: ● you satisfy the income requirement and you pass one of the four tests ● the exceptions apply ● the Commissioner exercises his discretion. In your situation, none of the exceptions would apply and although you satisfy the income requirement, you do not meet any of the four tests in the years of income under consideration. Your losses are therefore subject to the deferral rule, unless the Commissioner exercises his discretion. The relevant discretion may be exercised for the income year in question where: ● it is in the nature of the business activity that there will be a period of time before it can be expected to pass one of the four tests ● there is an objective expectation your business activity will produce a tax profit or meet one of the four tests within a commercially viable period for your industry. The note to section 35-55 of the ITAA 1997 which contains the discretion states this discretion is intended to cover a business activity where there is an inherent period of time between the commencement of the activity and the production of assessable income. For example, an activity involving the planting of hardwood trees for harvest, where many years would pass before the activity could reasonably be expected to produce income. For the discretion to be applied there needs to be an inherent or innate feature of the activity resulting in an inability to produce income in the year of commencement and (in most cases) a number of years thereafter. Further examples that fall into this category are viticulture and certain horticultural activities. The note above does not support any view that the discretion should be exercised for any start-up activity that is yet, for example, to satisfy the assessable income test in section 35-30 of the ITAA 1997, simply because of the small scale on which it was started, or because a client base is being built up. TR 2007/6: Income Tax: non-commercial losses: Commissioner's discretion provides the following example for illustrative purposes: | Detailed Reasoning - Example 9: 139. Andrew started a clock repair business in the 2001 income year. Andrew was new to the region and the industry and had yet to establish his clientele. Andrew had intended to operate his business full time but as his funding was very limited he chose to continue with his part time employment to support himself and only worked on his business activity in his spare time. Andrew's premises are in the back of a small arcade and he only opens for business on weekends while the other shops in the arcade are open every day of the week. The arcade is not in an area that attracts business on weekends. Andrew cannot afford advertising and has so few clients that he is unable to cover his expenses and has made losses each year. Andrew's business has yet to satisfy one of the four tests. Other businesses of this type are able to satisfy a test in the first year of operation. 140. The inability of Andrew's business activity to satisfy any of the four tests is due to his personal business choices as to hours of business, location and advertising, not any inherent characteristics that affect clock repair businesses. Accordingly the requirement of subparagraph 35-55(1)(b)(i) is not met and the Commissioner would not exercise the discretion. | Detailed Reasoning - Application to your circumstances: We do not consider that there is a lead time between the commencement of your activity and the production of any assessable income. Your business was able to generate income in your first financial year in operation. Therefore we do not consider that there is anything inherent or innate in the nature of your business activity that it has not yet been able to satisfy one of the tests. Your activity is of a type that is able to produce assessable income quite soon after its commencement, as the fees from your business activity have demonstrated. It appears that a significant contributor to the losses of your business is the initial start-up costs, delays in obtaining licences and the need to build up the client base. Therefore the Commissioner is unable to exercise the discretion.