Private ruling: non-commercial losses
Published: April 2012
Ruling period: Year ended 30 June 2011
Date scheme commenced: 30 August 2000

Ruling: Q1: Will the Commissioner exercise the discretion in paragraph 35-55(1)(a) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997) to allow you to include any losses from your primary production business activity in your calculation of taxable income for the 2010-11 financial year? | A1: Yes.

Relevant facts and circumstances: You do not satisfy the <$250,000 income requirement set out in subsection 35-10(2E) of the ITAA 1997. You carry on a primary production business. The business has been returning profits up to the 2008-09 financial year. You submit that the main reason for the 2010-11 loss was the weather conditions during the year. Exceptional unprecedented rains throughout the year resulted in the following: · costs increased significantly on pesticides and fungicides due to the rains · most of the crop was hand-picked rather than machine picked. The cost of hand-picking is significantly higher than machine picking · the increased spraying resulted in an excessive cost on diesel fuel of tractors. Loss of at least 100 tonnes of the crop due to damage and rot from the rains. The annual rainfall for the 2010-11 financial year was significantly higher than the average. You have provided the following estimates as to the impact of the abnormal rains. You are confident that your business will produce a profit by the 2011-12 financial year.

Relevant legislative provisions: Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 subsection 35-10(1) | Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 subsection 35-10(2) | Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 subsection 35-10(2E) | Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 paragraph 35-55(1)(a)

Reasons for decision: Summary: For the 2009-10 and later financial years, Division 35 of the ITAA 1997 will apply to defer a non-commercial loss from a business activity unless: · you satisfy the income requirement and you pass one of the four tests · the exceptions apply, or · the Commissioner exercises his discretion. In your situation, you do not satisfy the income requirement (that is your taxable income, reportable fringe benefits and reportable superannuation contributions but excluding your business losses, exceeds $250,000) and you do not come under any of the exceptions. Your business losses are therefore subject to the deferral rule unless the Commissioner exercises his discretion. The relevant discretion may be exercised for the income year in question where your business activity is affected by special circumstances outside your control. 'Special circumstances' are those circumstances which are sufficiently different to distinguish them from the circumstances that occur in the normal course of conducting a business activity, including drought, flood, bushfire or some other natural disaster. For individuals who do not satisfy the income requirement, the business activity must have been materially affected by the special circumstances, causing it to make a loss. In this context, the Commissioner may exercise this discretion for the income year(s) in question where, but for the special circumstances: · your business activity would have made a tax profit · the activity passes at least one of the four tests or, but for the special circumstances, would have passed one of the four tests. Having regard to your full circumstances, it is accepted that your business activity was affected by special circumstances outside your control. Further, it is accepted that: · but for the special circumstances, you would have made a tax profit · you have met one of the four tests or would have but for special circumstances. Consequently the Commissioner will exercise his discretion in the 2010-11 financial year.

Please check this edited version to be sure that there are no details remaining that you think may allow you to be identified. If you have any concerns about this ruling you wish to discuss, you will find our contact details in the fact sheet.