Private ruling: Dividend Run-Up Fund
Published: November 2012
Ruling period: year ending 30 June 2013 | year ending 30 June 2014 | year ending 30 June 2015
Date scheme commenced: The scheme is yet to commence.

Ruling: Q1: Will the Fund be considered to hold the stock and associated hedging positions on revenue account? | A1: Yes. | Q2: Are the various components of net Income of the Fund that are distributed to non-residents subject to withholding tax? | A2: Yes | Q3: Is the Fund subject to the streaming rules in Division 6E? | A3: Yes | Q4: Is the effect of the streaming rules that the investors should continue to be entitled to their proportionate share of the distributions and franking credits of the Fund? | A4: Yes | Q5: Is an Investor's share of the franked distribution which flows indirectly from the Fund dependent on the Fund having positive 'net income'? | A5: Yes | Q6: Will the Fund meet the test for eligibility for franking credits under former Part IIIAA? | A6: Yes | Q7: Will the investors be eligible for their share of franking credits pursuant to Section 160APHL? | A7: Yes | Q8: Will the Commissioner exercise the discretion under Section 160APHL(14) and also Section 272-5(3) of Schedule 2F by making a determination that each investor's interest in the Fund is to be taken as vested and indefeasible? | A8: Yes | Q9: Will Section 177EA operate to deny the Fund and/or its Investors entitlement to the franking credits? | A9: No

Relevant facts and circumstances: This ruling is based on the facts stated in the description of the scheme that is set out below. If your circumstances are materially different from these facts, this ruling has no effect and you cannot rely on it. The fact sheet has more information about relying on your private ruling. You will establish a Fund of which you will be the Responsible Entity. The Fund will be open-ended and primarily marketed in Australia to retail investors. It will be a managed investment scheme for the purposes of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) . The Strategy The Fund's investment strategy involves buying ASX-listed shares that are expected to experience abnormal returns over their earnings and dividend announcement dates and ex-dividend dates. To limit share specific risk and volatility, the Fund will partially hedge its exposure to these equity positions. The Fund is designed to exploit the theory of the "dividend run-up" phenomenon, which can be described in the following terms: · there is an increase in the share price in the lead up to the ex-dividend date, being the "run-up" factor; and · there is a fall or "drop-off" in the share price on the ex-dividend date by an amount that is less than the amount of the dividend (the "drop-off ratio"). The Fund will use a combination of quantitative screening and qualitative research to select ASX listed shares. The Fund's strategy is to hold such shares for a short period of time only (and ordinarily for a minimum of 45 days, not including the date of acquisition or disposal) with acquisition trades being executed prior to the ex-dividend date. Over the medium to long term, the objective of the investment strategy is to provide investors with: · a regular income above a benchmark; and · lower volatility than the S&P/ASX 200 Index. Shares may be sold prior to dividend entitlement Where the share that has been acquired pursuant to the strategy has appreciated significantly in price prior to the ex-dividend date, the Fund manager may dispose of the share to lock in the run-up gain. Conversely, it is also possible that the Fund manager will retain a particular share with the hope of making a gain from a favourable drop-off ratio. As such, the investment strategy of the Fund would be expected to result in a level of franked distributions flowing to investors. Assumptions For the purposes of this ruling it is assumed that: · the Fund is a 'managed investment trust' (MIT) as defined in section 12-400 of Schedule 1 of the Tax Administration Act 1953 (TAA) and will be treated as an Australian resident trust estate for the purposes of Division 6 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (ITAA 1936); · the Fund will not make the MIT capital election under section 275-115 of the ITAA 1997; · where the Fund falls within the managed fund exception to Division 230 of the ITAA 1997, having assets of less than $100 million, it will not specifically elect into TOFA; · the Fund is a 'widely held unit trust' for the purposes of section 272-105 of Schedule 2F of the ITAA 1936 and 'a widely held trust' for the purposes of (former) section 160APHD; · the Fund will have an amount of net income each year that will be wholly distributed to investors on a proportionate basis; · investors in the Fund will have an individual delta of at least 0.3 and will hold their units for at least 45 days (not including the date of acquisition or disposal); and · all transactions entered into will be on arm's length terms.

Relevant legislative provisions: Division 6 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 | Section 95 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 | Section 97 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 | Division 6E of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 | section 177D of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 | section 177EA of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 | section 272-105 of Schedule 2F of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 | Division 1A, Part IIIAA of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 | section 160APHD of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 | section 160APHJ of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 | section 160APHL of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 | section 160APHO of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 | section 160APHU of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 | Subdivision 207-B of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Division 230 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 | section 275-100 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 | section 275-115 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 | section 12-385 of Schedule 1 of the Tax Administration Act 1953 | section 12-405 of Schedule 1 of the TAA | section 12-400 of Schedule 1 of the Tax Administration Act 1953 | section 7 of the Income Tax (Dividends, Interest and Royalties Withholding Tax) Act 1974 | Corporations Act 2001

Reasons for decision: Summary: Will the Fund be considered to hold the stock and associated hedging positions on revenue account? Yes. For the purposes of this ruling it is assumed that the Fund is a 'managed investment trust' (MIT) as defined in section 12-400 of Schedule 1 of the TAA and that the Fund will not make the MIT capital election under section 275-115 of the ITAA 1997. As a result of not making the MIT capital election, the share and associated hedging positions will not be taxed under the CGT regime (as provided for under section 275-100). Any gain or loss on the disposal of those assets will be assessable income or an allowable deduction for the Fund, for the purposes of calculating its net income under Division 6 of the ITAA 1936 and related purposes. Are the various components of net Income of the Fund that are distributed to non-residents subject to withholding tax? Yes Having satisfied the definition of a MIT, a trustee of a trust that is a 'managed investment trust' that makes a 'fund payment' to an entity that has an address outside of Australia must withhold an amount from the 'fund payment' according to section 12-385 of Schedule 1 of the Tax Administration Act 1953 (TAA). For fund payments starting on or after 1 July 2012 the amount withheld is equal to the 'fund payment' multiplied by 15% where the recipient is located in an 'information exchange country'; otherwise 30% (subsection 12-385(3) of Schedule 1 of the TAA). The meaning of 'fund payment' is given by section 12-405 of Schedule 1 of the TAA and ensures that the total of the fund payments that the Trustee of a trust makes in relation to an income year equals, as nearly as practicable, the net income of the trust for the income year, disregarding dividends, interest, royalties, capital gains, and amounts that are not from an Australian source, while disregarding deductions relating to excluded amounts. The 'fund payment' of the Fund should therefore reflect the revenue gains on the disposal of shares and realisation of any associated hedging positions less any revenue losses on the disposal of shares and realisation of any associated hedging positions, and any other fees and expenses relating to such amounts. For residents of non-treaty countries the rates of withholding tax imposed for dividend and interest income are contained in section 7 of the Income Tax (Dividends, Interest and Royalties Withholding Tax) Act 1974 . The ordinary rates of non-resident withholding tax are as follows: Dividends - to the extent they are unfranked: - 30% Interest: - 10% For residents of treaty countries the rates of withholding tax are contained in the respective International Tax Agreements. The rates of withholding tax are commonly 15% for portfolio dividends and 10% for interest income however there may be exceptions. Please refer to the relevant International Tax Agreement as required. Is the Fund subject to the streaming rules in Division 6E? Yes Division 6E of the ITAA 1936 (Division 6E) will apply to the Fund on the basis that the net income of the trust exceeds nil and includes franked distributions or franking credits. The effect of Division 6E is to carve out franked distributions and franking credits from the net income of the Fund for the purposes of determining the assessable income of Investors under section 97 of the ITAA 1936. Franked distributions and attached franking credits are dealt with under Subdivision 207-B of the ITAA 1936. Investors - present entitlement The Investors will be presently entitled at the end of each respective distribution period to their proportionate share of the distributable income of the Fund and at the end of the income year will, in accordance with section 97, include in their assessable income their proportionate share of the Division 6E net income of the Fund. In addition, the Investors will also be entitled to their share of franked distributions and franking credits determined under Subdivision 207-B of the ITAA 1997 - see Question 4. Is the effect of the streaming rules that the investors should continue to be entitled to their proportionate share of the distributions and franking credits of the Fund? Yes Investors - entitlement to franked distributions Franked distributions and franking credits are carved out of the Division 6E net income of the Fund and are dealt with under Subdivision 207-B of the ITAA 1997. Broadly, the 'attributable franked distribution' of the Investor pursuant to section 207-37 is equal to the total franked distribution of the Fund (net of any directly relevant expenses) multiplied by the beneficiary's proportionate share of the franked distribution (as determined under section 207-55). As there is no 'specific entitlement' to franked distributions under the draft Constitution of the Fund, this percentage will be equivalent to the Investor's original Division 6 percentage of net income. 1 The Investor's share of the franking credit attaching to the franked distribution is worked out pursuant to section 207-57 such that the Investor's notional allocation of franking credits is equal to their proportionate share of the franked distribution. Pursuant to subsection 207-37(2) and subsection 207-37(3) where the net income of the trust estate is less than the total of all franked distributions included in the assessable income of the trust estate then the 'attributable franked distribution' is reduced to ensure Investors' assessable income will equal the net income of the Fund. The Investor's notional allocation of franking credits pursuant to section 207-57 is unaffected by subsection 207-37(2) and subsection 207-37(3). Is an Investor's share of the franked distribution which flows indirectly from the Fund dependent on the Fund having positive 'net income'? Yes Under subsection 207-50(3), a franked distribution only flows indirectly to a beneficiary if during that year the distribution is made to the Trustee of the trust; the beneficiary has a share of the trust's net income that is covered by paragraph 97(1)(a) of the ITAA 1936 (that is, inclusive of franked distributions); and the beneficiary's share of the franked distribution under section 207-55 is a positive amount. It is implicit in the wording of subsection 207-50(3) that in order for a franked distribution to flow indirectly to a beneficiary the trust must have a positive amount of net income for the purposes of section 95 of the ITAA 1936 in respect of which the beneficiary has a share. Furthermore, it is expressly stated in Item 3 of the table at section 207-55(3) that the trust has a positive amount of net income for that year in order for the amount of the franked distribution to be taken into account in determining the beneficiary's share of the franked distribution. Will the Fund meet the test for eligibility for franking credits under former Part IIIAA? Yes Test for eligibility for franking credits under former Division 1A, Part IIIAA of the ITAA 1936 You (as Trustee of the Fund) will be required to satisfy the "qualified person" test in relation to any franked distributions you receive in order for beneficiaries to be entitled to tax offsets in respect of such franking credits (paragraph 207-145(1)(a) and TD 2007/11). You will meet the 'qualified person' test on the basis of the features of the associated hedging positions as set out in the relevant facts and circumstances, including the Assumptions, of this Ruling: The cumulative exposure of all associated hedging positions for a particular stock position will have a negative delta that will never be less than -0.7. The terms of the associated hedging positions will not result in a related payment that would impact the 'qualified person' test (paragraph 160APHJ(10)(c)). The shares will be held for a minimum of 45 days (not including the date of acquisition or disposal) (subsection 160APHO(2)) over which the Fund would not be considered to have 'materially diminished risks of loss or opportunities for gain in respect of the shares' (subsection 160APHO(3)). Will the investors be eligible for their share of franking credits pursuant to Section 160APHL? Yes Test for eligibility for franking credits under former Division 1A, Part IIIAA of the ITAA 1936 Investors will be entitled to their 'share' of the franking credits of the Fund as determined under section 207-57 provided they also meet the 'qualified person' test in respect of their interest in the underlying shares, as modified by (former) section 160APHL. The following requirements are applicable in the context of the Fund: The Trustee of the Fund is a 'qualified person' in respect of any dividends received on the underlying shares (subsection 160APHU(1)); The Fund is a 'widely held trust' for the purposes of section 160APHD; There is a trust amount in respect of the trust in relation to a beneficiary that is wholly or partly attributable to dividend income (subsection 160APHL(2)(c)); and The Investors hold a 'fixed interest' in the shares held by the Fund for the purposes of section 160APHL(10). Pursuant to section 160APHL(11) a vested and indefeasible interest constitutes a fixed interest. Where an interest is not vested and indefeasible the Commissioner may determine an interest to be vested and indefeasible pursuant to section 160APHL(14). In this instance, the Commissioner will deem an interest in the Fund to be vested and indefeasible - see Question 8. Will the Commissioner exercise the discretion under section 160APHL(14) and also Section 272-5(3) of Schedule 2F by making a determination that each investor's interest in the Fund is to be taken as vested and indefeasible? Yes For the purposes of subsection 272-5(1) of Schedule 2F to the ITAA 1936, the 'trust instrument' of the Fund consists of the draft Constitution. It is accepted that the draft Constitution provides the unit holders with a vested interest in; · all of the income that the Fund derives; and · all of the capital of the Fund. For the purposes of the 'vested and indefeasible' definition in subsection 272-5(1) of Schedule 2F, the key question is whether the Trustee or manager holds a power that, if exercised, would result in a defeasance of some or all of a unit holder's (or beneficiary's) rights to the income and/or capital of the trust. The draft Constitution of the Fund contains certain clauses by which a beneficiary's interest in a share of the income or capital of the trust may be defeased. Therefore, in accordance with subsection 272-5(1) of Schedule 2F to the ITAA 1936, the beneficiaries do not have fixed entitlements to all of the income and capital of the Fund. Subsection 272-5(3) of Schedule 2F to the ITAA 1936 Subsection 272-5(3) of Schedule 2F to the ITAA 1936 contains a discretion, whereby in cases where beneficiaries do not have a fixed entitlement, the Commissioner may, for the purposes of the Act, treat such beneficiaries as having a fixed entitlement, having regard to the factors prescribed in paragraph 272-5(3)(b). Paragraph 272-5(3)(b) states that the Commissioner may treat a beneficiary as having a fixed entitlement having regard to: (i) the circumstances in which the entitlement is capable of not vesting or the defeasance can happen; and (ii) the likelihood of the entitlement not vesting or the defeasance happening; and (iii) the nature of the trust. Subparagraph 272-5(3)(b)(i) Factors that are relevant to the circumstances in which the entitlement is capable of not vesting or the defeasance can happen include: The Fund will be a registered managed investment scheme for the purposes of the Corporations Act 2001 ; The draft Constitution of the Fund is comparable and commensurate to the trust instruments of other registered managed investment schemes; No clause includes an express or implied power which would enable the Trustee of the Fund to issue or redeem units without valuable consideration passing from, or to, the affected unit holder. Subparagraph 272-5(3)(b)(ii) The likelihood of the entitlement not vesting or the defeasance happening in respect of the relevant clauses of the draft Constitution is minimal because of the protections afforded to beneficiaries and the duties imposed on the Trustee of the Fund by the Corporations Act 2001 . Subparagraph 272-5(3)(b)(iii) Factors regarding the nature of the trust in the context of whether the Commissioner may treat a beneficiary as having a fixed entitlement include: The Fund will be a registered managed investment scheme under the Corporations Act 2001 (Corporations Act) . As such, the Trustee will have certain duties, and be subject to controls, under Chapter 5C of the Corporations Act , and in particular those specified in subsection 601FC(1). Under section 601FA of the Corporations Act , the Trustee of the Fund (as the Responsible Entity) will have to be a public company that holds an Australian Financial Services Licence (AFSL) authorising it to operate a managed investment scheme. As such it will be required to meet the AFSL conditions, as set out in ASIC Pro Forma 209 as well as the prescribed conditions under Regulation 7.6.04 of the Corporations Regulations . The Trustee (as the Responsible Entity) will have to comply with the terms of any ASIC Class Orders or other forms of ASIC relief. The Trustee does not have any discretion in relation to the unit holders' rights to income or capital, as these are governed by the formulae in the Constitution. Pursuant to paragraph 272-5(3)(b) of Schedule 2F to the ITAA 1936, and after having regard to the requirements of subparagraphs 272-5(3)(b)(i), (ii) and (iii), it is submitted that it is appropriate that the beneficiaries of the Fund should be treated as having fixed entitlements to the Fund and will have fixed entitlements to all of the income and capital of the Fund during the relevant period. The Fund will be considered to be a fixed trust for the purposes of the ITAA 1936 and the ITAA 1997 during the relevant period. In light of the above discussion, it follows that the Commissioner will also exercise the discretion under section 160APHL(14) to deem an interest held by a beneficiary in the Fund to be vested and indefeasible. Will Section 177EA operate to deny the Fund and/or its Investors entitlement to the franking credits? No The scheme The first requirement of subsection 177EA(3) is that there is a scheme for a disposition of membership interests, or an interest in membership interests, in a corporate tax entity: paragraph 177EA(3)(a). Subsection 177EA(14) defines a "scheme for a disposition" of membership interests or an interest in a membership interest inclusively, by reference to a scheme which involves any of the matters set out in paragraphs 177EA(14)(a) to (f). The creation and issuance of units in the Fund together with the acquisition of an ASX listed share by the Fund is a scheme for a disposition of a relevant interest: see paragraphs 177EA(14)(b), (c). Entering into the associated hedging positions in relation to the share may give rise to a scheme within paragraph 177EA(14)(e) to the extent it substantially alters the risks of loss, or opportunities for gain, in the interest in membership interests, or may be included within the scheme identified above. Therefore paragraph 177EA(3)(a) will be satisfied. The elements in paragraphs 177EA(3)(b), 177EA(3)(c) and 177EA(3)(d) will also be satisfied. The investment strategy of the Fund is expected to result in frankable distributions being paid to the Fund, which in turn would give rise to frankable distributions flowing to the investors through their investment in units in the Fund. As the shares will be in publicly listed Australian companies, it is expected that any such frankable distribution will bear franking credits. Paragraph 177EA(3)(e) remains to be considered. The requirements of that paragraph will be satisfied if: ...having regard to the relevant circumstances of the scheme, it would be concluded that the person, or one of the persons, who entered into or carried out the scheme or any part of the scheme did so for a purpose (whether or not the dominant purpose but not including an incidental purpose) of enabling the relevant taxpayer to obtain an imputation benefit. 2 In this case, there are 3 types of 'gains' that might be made: gains referable to dividends, gains referable to franking credits and trading gains. The ability to make trading gains is impacted by the cumulative features such as the adoption of the hedging arrangements, and the relatively short period of time of that shareholding. The tax benefits and the taxpayers For the purposes of identifying the "relevant taxpayer" under paragraph 177EA(3)(d), frankable distributions are expected to be paid to the Fund and the frankable distributions are expected to flow indirectly to the investor in the Fund. Weighing each of the factors in applying the applicable purpose test The relevant circumstances of a scheme The application of section 177EA to an investment in units in the Fund turns on whether, after consideration of the relevant circumstances, it would be concluded that a person who entered into or carried out the scheme did so for a more than an incidental purpose of enabling the investors to obtain an imputation benefit. The relevant circumstances of a scheme for a disposition of an investments in units in the Fund and subsequent acquisition of shares likely to pay franked distributions are considered below in the light of the factors listed in subsection 177EA(17). Of those factors, only the following are considered relevant. First relevant matter - paragraph 177EA(17)(a) Paragraph 177EA(17)(a) states that the relevant circumstances of a scheme include: the extent and duration of the risks of loss, and the opportunities for profit or gain, from holding membership interests, or having interests in membership interests, in the corporate tax entity that are respectively borne by or accrue to the parties to the scheme, and whether there has been any change in those risks and opportunities for the relevant taxpayer or any other party to the scheme (for example, a change resulting from the making of any contract, the granting of any option or the entering into of any arrangement with respect to any membership interests, or interests in membership interests, in the corporate tax entity); The terms upon which units in the Fund are issued and the strategy to be followed limit the ordinary risks and opportunities of ownership of a company through the use of hedging positions. The Fund will enter into associated hedging positions to partially hedge its exposure to movements in the market price of the share. The Trustee acknowledges that the associated hedging positions will have an impact upon the risks of loss and opportunities for gain, the investors will remain exposed to a sufficient level of risk and opportunity to both satisfy the "qualified person" rules in former Division 1A, Part IIIAA of ITAA 1936 and neutralise the effect of paragraph 177EA(17)(a). There also remains a risk that the dividend payable in respect of the share may be less (or more) than expected. Paragraph 177EA(17)(a) also requires an examination of whether there has been any change in the risks and opportunities for a relevant taxpayer (for example, by the use of the associated hedging positions). The associated hedging positions entered into by the Fund have the effect of limiting the Fund's (and the Investor's) exposure to those risks and opportunities during the period for which it holds the shares. The duration of risks of loss and opportunities of gain for the unit holder in relation to a particular share also falls for consideration under paragraph 177EA(17)(a). Under the Fund's investment strategy, the Fund will hold the underlying shares for a relatively short period of time and it may dispose of shares prior to the ex-dividend date. If the Fund disposes of shares at any point prior to the end of the proposed holding period, the associated hedging positions must be unwound at an additional cost to the Fund. The limitation of the Investors' exposure to the risks of loss and opportunities for gain that ordinarily attach to equity interests in a company is consistent with a purpose of enabling the investors to obtain an imputation benefit. However, it is also noted that the associated hedge positions will operate in a way that the Fund and investors will remain at risk in relation to share price movements to some degree. Second relevant matter - paragraph 177EA(17)(i) Paragraph 177EA(17)(i) states that the relevant circumstances of a scheme include: the period for which the relevant taxpayer held membership interests, or had an interest in membership interests, in the corporate tax entity; The Fund will hold its shares for a relatively short period. Regardless of whether the Investor has satisfied the rules in former Division 1A, Part IIIAA of ITAA 1936 for being a "qualified person" in relation to the distribution, the short holding period is a relevant circumstance that weighs in favour of there being a more than incidental purpose of obtaining a franking benefit. This may be contrasted with a situation where an investor has no predetermined strategy of buying, and then selling the shares within a short period but actually does so to take advantage of price movements in the shares. Third relevant matter - paragraph 177EA(17)(j) Paragraph 177EA(17)(j) states that the relevant circumstances of a scheme include: any of the matters referred to in subparagraphs 177D(b)(i) to (viii). Paragraph 177EA(17)(j) imports the eight factors listed in paragraph 177D(b) to the list of relevant factors to be considered in determining purpose under section 177EA. Of these factors, two are relevant to the Fund: Manner in which the scheme was carried out or entered into (subparagraph 177D(b)(i)) ; and the time at which the scheme was entered into and the length of the period during which the scheme was carried out: subparagraph 177D(b)(iii); Manner The acquisition of the shares and entry into the associated hedging positions by the Fund is principally to capture, on a partly protected basis, the dividend and associated franking credit on those shares and at the same time take advantage of the dividend run up phenomenon. The investment strategy involves trading within the 45 day holding period rule and structuring the associated hedge positions in such a way that it also complies with the qualified person rules under the former Part IIIA. There is a real possibility that the Fund might make trading gains resulting from the disposal of shares. The reduced risk of loss and opportunity for profit afforded by the associated hedging positions and the further reduction in 'equity risk' as a result of the short holding period are factors that suggest the fundamentals of the stock are not a primary consideration for the portfolio manager. It is accepted that the intention of the Fund is to make a before tax return that consists of run-up gains and that achieving the investment benchmark is its primary objective. On that basis, this matter does not indicate that the Trustee does not have a more than incidental purpose of obtaining franking credits. Timing The Fund intends capture the perceived dividend run up phenomenon by investing in stocks when financial results are announced and also prior to the ex-date. Implicit in this strategy is the intention to capture dividends and any associated franking benefits however it is accepted that part of the strategy is also geared towards making trading gains in the run up to the ex dividend date. In this case, this matter is co-extensive with paragraph 177EA(17)(i). Weighing up the circumstances Having regard to the relevant circumstances discussed above, it is then necessary to determine whether the Fund and/or its Investors entered into the scheme with a more than incidental purpose of obtaining a franking benefit. The Fund aims to achieve a positive amount of income through receiving interest income and purchasing, on a partly protected basis, ASX listed stocks and either selling them for a profit prior to the ex-dividend date or holding them over the ex-dividend date. The presence of the associated hedging positions combined with a short holding period reduces the risk ordinarily associated with holding shares. Despite this, the making of modest trading gains prior to the ex-dividend date is consistent with the Fund's desire to take advantage of the dividend run-up phenomenon and achieve its investment benchmark. Similarly, the Fund anticipates that a dividend drop-off ratio less than 1 should ensure that the expected yield (absent franking) is attractive. Provided that the scheme ruled on is entered into and carried out in the manner described in the 'relevant facts and circumstances' section of this Ruling, including the Assumptions, on balance section 177EA of the ITAA 1936 will not deny the Fund its entitlement to franking credits or deny its Investors their allocation of franking credits attaching to their share of the franked distributions of the Fund. If the scheme is enacted with any material variations to that described in the Ruling, the Ruling will be invalid.

Please check this edited version to be sure that there are no details remaining that you think may allow you to be identified. If you have any concerns about this ruling you wish to discuss, you will find our contact details in the fact sheet.