Private ruling: Non-commercial losses
Published: December 2012

Ruling: Q1: Will the Commissioner exercise the discretion in paragraph 35-55(1)(c) of the ITAA 1997 to allow you to include any losses from your business activity in your calculation of taxable income? | A1: No


Relevant legislative provisions: Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 subsection 35-10(1) Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 subsection 35-10(2) Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 subsection 35-10(2E) | Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 paragraph 35-55(1)(b) | Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 paragraph 35-55(1)(c)

Reasons for decision: Summary: For the 2009-10 and later financial years, Division 35 of the ITAA 1997 will apply to defer a non-commercial loss from a business activity unless: · you meet the income requirement and you pass one of the four tests; · the exceptions apply; or · the Commissioner exercises his discretion. Your business losses are subject to the deferral rule unless the Commissioner exercises his discretion. The relevant discretion may be exercised for the financial year in question where: · it is in the nature of your business activity that there will be a period before a tax profit can be produced; and · there is an objective expectation your business activity will produce a tax profit within the commercially viable period for your industry. Having regard to your full circumstances, it is not accepted that it is in the nature of the business activity that has prevented you from passing a test or making a profit. This discretion is intended to cover a business activity where there is an inherent period of time between the commencement of the activity and the production of assessable income. For example, an activity involving the planting of hardwood trees for harvest, where many years would pass before the activity could reasonably be expected to produce income. For the discretion to be applied there needs to be an inherent or innate feature of the activity resulting in an inability to make a profit in the year of commencement and (in most cases) a number of years thereafter. TR 2007/6 does not support any view that the discretion should available where the failure to make a profit is for reasons other than the nature of the business, such as, a consequence of starting out small and phased implementation or business choices made by an individual that are not consistent with the ordinary or accepted practice in the industry concerned - such as the hours of operation, location, climate or soil conditions, or the level of debt funding. Your choice to start small and build your business in phases does not alter the lead time of the activity. It follows the Commissioner cannot exercise his discretion in your case because the lead time will have expired by the time you pass a test or make a profit.

Please check this edited version to be sure that there are no details remaining that you think may allow you to be identified. If you have any concerns about this ruling you wish to discuss, you will find our contact details in the fact sheet. | Relevant facts: You carry on a primary production business. | You intend to start small and gradually grow your business. | You expect to make a profit in a future year.