Private ruling: Non commercial losses and the Commissioner's discretion
Published: October 2012
Ruling period: Year ended 30 June 2011 | Year ended 30 June 2012
Date scheme commenced: On or after 1 January 2009

Ruling: Q1: Will the Commissioner exercise the discretion in paragraph 35-55(1)(a) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997) to allow you to include any losses from your primary production activity in your calculation of taxable income for the 2010-11 and 2011-12 financial years? | A1: Yes.


Relevant legislative provisions: Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 - Subsection 35-10(2E). | Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 - Subsection 35-55

Reasons for decision: Summary: For the 2009-10 and later income years, Division 35 of the ITAA 1997 will apply to defer a non-commercial loss from a business activity unless: · you satisfy the income requirement and you pass one of the four tests · the exceptions apply, or · the Commissioner exercises his discretion. In your situation, you do not satisfy the income requirement (that is your taxable income, reportable fringe benefits and reportable superannuation contributions but excluding your business losses, exceeds $250,000) and you do not come under any of the exceptions. Your business losses are therefore subject to the deferral rule unless the Commissioner exercises his discretion. The relevant discretion may be exercised for the income year in question where your business activity is affected by special circumstances outside your control. 'Special circumstances' are those circumstances which are sufficiently different to distinguish them from the circumstances that occur in the normal course of conducting a business activity, including drought, flood, bushfire or some other natural disaster. For individuals who do not satisfy the income requirement, the business activity must have been materially affected by the special circumstances, causing it to make a loss. In this context, the Commissioner may exercise this discretion for the income year(s) in question where, but for the special circumstances: · your business activity would have made a tax profit, and · the activity passes at least one of the four tests or, but for the special circumstances, would have passed one of the four tests. Having regard to your full circumstances, it is accepted that your business activity was affected by special circumstances outside your control. Further, it is accepted that: · but for the special circumstances, you would have made a tax profit · you have met one of the four tests or would have but for special circumstances. Consequently the Commissioner will exercise his discretion in the 2010-11 and 2011-12 financial years.

Please check this edited version to be sure that there are no details remaining that you think may allow you to be identified. If you have any concerns about this ruling you wish to discuss, you will find our contact details in the fact sheet. | Relevant facts: You commenced your activity with a planting in 200X and a further planting after that time. | Hail destroyed your crop in 2010 and 2011 and floods in 2011. You have provided newspaper articles supporting the claim that your area was severely affected by hail. | You harvested some of your crop in 2012 and produced some income. | You have provided actual and estimate income and expense figures for the 2008-09 to 2013-14 financial years. | You expect to make a profit from your activity from the 2012-13 financial year. | You do not satisfy subsection 35-10(2E) of the ITAA 1997 as your adjusted taxable income was more than $250,000.