Private ruling: Assignment of Partnership Interest
Published: May 2015
Ruling period: Year ending 30 June 2015 | Year ending 30 June 2016
Date scheme commenced: 1 July 2014

Ruling: Questions and Answers | 1. Will capital gains tax (CGT) event E1 apply when you commence holding a portion of your interest in the Partnership as trustee for the Company? | Yes | 2. Will CGT event E2 apply when you commence holding a portion of your interest in the Partnership as trustee for the Company? | No | 3. Will CGT event A1 apply when you commence holding a portion of your interest in the Partnership as trustee for the Company? | No | 4. Will CGT event D1 apply when you commence holding a portion of your interest in the Partnership as trustee for the Company? | No | 5. Will the CGT event happen in relation to an active asset owned by you, for the purposes of section 152-40 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997)? | Yes | 6. Will the Commissioner administer the disposal of Partnership interests on 1 July 2015, which are held legally and beneficially by you, in a manner consistent with the principles in Taxation Ruling IT 2540 such that the deemed market value consideration under subsection 116-30(1) of the ITAA 1997 will equal the actual consideration, being nil? | Yes | 7. Will the Commissioner administer the acquisition of Partnership interests on 1 July 2015 which are held legally and beneficially by you, in a manner consistent with the principles in IT 2540 such that the deemed market value cost base under subsection 112-20(1) of the ITAA 1997 will be equal to the actual consideration paid, being nil? | Yes | 8. Will the Commissioner administer the disposal of Partnership interests on 1 July 2015 which are held by you as trustee for the Company, in a manner consistent with the principles in IT 2540 such that the deemed market value consideration under subsection 116-30(1) of the ITAA 1997 will equal the actual consideration, being nil? | Yes | 9. Will the Commissioner administer the acquisition of Partnership interests on 1 July 2015, which are held by you as trustee for the Company, in a manner consistent with the principles in IT 2540 such that the deemed market value cost base under subsection 112-20(1) of the ITAA 1997 will be equal to the actual consideration paid, being nil? | Yes | 10. Will the Commissioner apply Part IVA to deny any tax benefit obtained as a result of assigning an interest in the Partnership to the Company? | No


Relevant legislative provisions: Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 104-55 | Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 104-60 | Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Subsection 102-25(1) | Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 104-10 | Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 104-35 | Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Subsection 104-35(5) | Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Subsection 106-5(3) | Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Subsection 106-5(4) | Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Subsection 112-20(1) | Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Subsection 116-30(1) | Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 152-40 | Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 152-35 | Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 Part IVA | Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 Section 177F | Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 Section 177A | Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 Section 177C | Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 Section 177D

Reasons for decision: Summary: CGT event E1 will happen when you commence holding a portion of your interest in the partnership as trustee. CGT events E2, A1 and D1 will not apply. Your partnership interest will be considered an active asset as it is an intangible asset you own that is inherently connected with a business that is carried on (whether alone or in partnership) by you, your affiliate, or an entity connected with you. The Commissioner will administer the disposal and acquisition of Partnership interests on 1 July 2015, held by you, in a manner consistent with the principles in Taxation Ruling IT 2540 Income tax: capital gains: application to disposals of partnership assets and partnership interests (IT 2540) , such that the Commissioner will accept that the market value of the capital proceeds and the cost base will be nil. The Commissioner will administer the disposal and acquisition of partnership interests on 1 July 2015, held by you as trustee for the Company, in a manner consistent with the principles in IT 2540 such that the Commissioner will accept that the market value of the capital proceeds and the cost base will be nil. On the assumption that the assignment agreement will have the same legal effect and be prepared in a manner consistent with the assignments considered by the High Court in Everett and Galland , the Commissioner will not apply Part IVA to deny any tax benefit obtained as a result of assigning an interest in the Partnership to the Trust. | Detailed Reasoning - Detailed reasoning: CGT implications of holding a portion of your partnership interest as trustee In the present case you will commence to hold a portion of your interest in the Partnership as a trustee, in a manner consistent with the assignment considered in Everett . IT 2540 addresses the CGT implications of entering into an Everett assignment, paragraph 24 provides that the effect of an Everett assignment is that the partner disposes of part of his or her partnership interest, notwithstanding that the assignee only has an equitable interest in the assignor's partnership interest and that legal title to the partnership assets continues to vest in the partners to the exclusion of the assignee. Under a valid Everett assignment a partner assigns part of their equitable interest in a partnership to an associated entity (such as a discretionary trust). The assignor retains legal ownership and the assignee acquires equitable ownership in the assigned part. The assignee is entitled to receive part of the assignor's share of the partnership income, but with limited or no entitlement to a transfer of the legal ownership of the assigned interest or to participate in the management of the partnership. The High Court in Everett rejected the Commissioner's argument that the right of a partner to receive a proportion of partnership profits was a right separate and severable from their share in a partnership. In reaching this conclusion, the Court made several statements about the nature of an interest in a partnership and the consequences of an assignment of such an interest (or part thereof). Critically, the Court explained the nature of the relationship between the assignee and assignor: Ordinarily the effect of an equitable assignment of an equitable interest is to entitle the assignee to all equitable remedies applicable to the subject matter of the assignment and to give a good discharge (Meagher Gummow and Lehane [606]. By virtue of the assignment the assignee stands in the shoes of the assignor so that there is no necessity to regard the assignor as a trustee for the assignee. However the assignment of a partner's equitable interest in a partnership produces rather different consequences. A contract for the sale of such an interest is of course a contract capable of specific performance and in an action for specific performance the Court will direct the execution of an assignment (Dodson v Downey [1901] 2 Ch 620). Before the introduction of the Partnership Acts it was well settled that "a person who agreed to buy a portion of the interest of a partner in a partnership did not become a partner, but that his vendor, while remaining a member of the partnership exactly as before, became a trustee for him of the interest agreed to be sold" Hocking at 743-744 per Griffith CJ; see also p 749. In that case the Court considered that the counterpart of sec 31 of Partnership Act 1892 NSW did not alter the law relating to the assignment of part of a partner's interest in a partnership. Does this trust relationship come to an end when the contract of sale is completed and a formal equitable assignment is executed? The question must, we think, be answered in the negative, though the nature of the trust changes once the vendor receives payment under the contract. Our reason for saying that a trust continues is that the assignment does not constitute the assignee a partner or pass to him the powers of management, administration and inspection of books and accounts which repose in the assignor as a partner. What is more, legal title to the assets of the partnership continues to vest in the partners to the exclusion of the assignee and he has no access to the assets. The extent of the assignee's equitable interest is ascertainable only on dissolution. These considerations lead us to the conclusion that the assigning partner continues to stand in the relationship of a trustee to the assignee, notwithstanding that the assignee may be entitled to receive payments from partnership profits direct from the partnership. This analysis is reflected in IT 2608 which provides: 'It is clear from the decisions of the High Court that income flowing from the assigned interest in the partnership is income of a trust estate - comprising the assigned interest - for the purposes of Division 6 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 '. References to disposal of an assigned interest (such as paragraph 24 of IT 2540) must be read in that light. CGT event E1 The Commissioner considers that CGT event E1 will happen when you commence holding a portion of your interest in the Partnership as trustee for the Company. Section 104-55 of the ITAA 1997 provides that CGT event E1 happens if you create a trust over a CGT asset by declaration or settlement. In order for CGT event E1 to happen, two requirements must be satisfied. These are: • you must create a trust over a CGT asset by declaration or settlement; and • the exceptions in subsection 104-55(5) must not apply None of the exceptions in subsection 104-55(5) apply in the present case. Accordingly, the second condition is satisfied. Further, it is considered that the first condition is satisfied in the present case. No trust relationship currently exists between you and the Company. However, you intend to commence holding a portion of your interest in the Partnership as trustee for the Company. Accordingly, it is clear that the proposed arrangement will involve the creation of a trust. Furthermore, it is considered that this trust would be created by declaration or settlement. When a statute speaks of a 'declaration' of trust, it is naturally taken as referring to a declaration or instrument which is effective to create a trust by operating upon property vested in the declarant. This is what would occur in the present case when you commence holding a portion of your interest in the Partnership as trustee for the Company. A resolution that property is to be held on a separate trust is sufficient to amount to a declaration for the purposes of CGT event E1, even if there is no express declaration. The manifestation of an intention to create the relevant trust can be inferred from words or conduct, and no formal or technical language is required. Accordingly, it is not essential that you use words such as 'I declare myself a trustee'. Alternatively it is considered that a trust would be created by way of 'settlement' for the purposes of CGT event E1 in the present case, being an instrument which creates a new beneficial interest in property through the imposition of a trust. CGT event E2 Section 104-60 of ITAA 1997 explains that CGT event E2 happens if you transfer a CGT asset to an existing trust. A distinction is to be drawn between the creation of a trust over an asset and the transfer of an asset to an existing trust: Truesdale v. Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1971) 120 CLR 353; 70 ATC 4056. In the present case, you will commence holding your interest in the partnership as trustee. No trust will be in existence before that time. Accordingly, you will not transfer an asset to an existing trust and CGT event E2 will not happen. CGT event A1 Section 104-10 of ITAA 1997 explains that CGT event A1 happens if you dispose of a CGT asset. In your case, you will dispose of a part-interest in the Partnership when you commence holding it as Trustee for the Company. However, in accordance with subsection 102-25(1) of the ITAA 1997, CGT event E1 is more specific to the situation, therefore CGT event A1 will not apply. CGT event D1 Section 104-35 of ITAA 1997 explains that CGT event D1 happens if you create a contractual right or other legal or equitable right in another entity. The proposed arrangement in your case will create a right in another entity. However, as it will result in CGT event E1 happening, CGT event D1 will not apply by virtue of subsection 102-25(1) of the ITAA 1997. Active asset test Section 152-40 of the ITAA 1997 provides the meaning of 'active asset'. A CGT asset will be an active asset at a time if, at that time, you own the asset and the asset was used or held ready for use by you, an affiliate of yours, or by another entity that is 'connected with' you, in the course of carrying on a business. Subsection 152-35(1) of the ITAA 1997 states that a CGT asset satisfies the active asset test if: • you have owned the asset for 15 years or less and the asset was an active asset of yours for a total of at least half of the period of ownership, or • you have owned the asset for more than 15 years and the asset was an active asset of yours for a total of at least 7 and a half years. Subsection 152-40(1) of the ITAA 1997 provides that an asset is an active asset if the asset is an intangible asset you own and is inherently connected with a business that is carried on (whether alone or in partnership) by you, your affiliate, or an entity connected with you. In your case, your interest in the Partnership is an intangible asset. It was through this interest that you carried on a business in partnership with others. Your interest in the Partnership is inseparable from the business (and therefore inherently connected with the business) that you carried on. As such, the interest is considered an active asset. As your partnership interest was necessarily employed as an active asset throughout the whole period that you held it, the active asset test is satisfied. Disposal and acquisition of Partnership interests on 1 July 2015 Subsection 106-5(4) of the ITAA 1997 provides that if a new partner is admitted to a partnership: a) the new partner acquires a share (according to the partnership agreement, or partnership law if there is no agreement) of each partnership asset; and b) the existing partners are treated as having disposed of part of their interest in each partnership asset to the extent that the new partner has acquired it. Subsection 106-5(3) of the ITAA 1997 states that if a partner leaves a partnership, a remaining partner acquires a separate CGT asset to the extent that the remaining partner acquires a share of the departing partner's interest in a partnership asset. In your case, under the terms of the partnership agreement, no consideration is payable in respect of goodwill on the exit or admittance of partner's to the partnership. As no consideration will be received by you for your interest in the goodwill of the firm when you dispose of a part of your partnership interest, it will need to be considered whether the market value substitution rules will apply. Subsection 116-30(1) of the ITAA 1997 provides that if you received no capital proceeds from a CGT event, you are taken to have received the market value of the CGT asset that is the subject of the event (the market value is worked out as at the time of the event). Subsection 112-20(1) of the ITAA 1997 explains that the first element of your cost base and reduced cost base of a CGT asset you acquire from another entity is its market value (at the time of acquisition) if: a) you did not incur expenditure to acquire it, except where your acquisition of the asset resulted from: i. CGT event D1 happening; or ii. another entity doing something that did not constitute a CGT event happening; or b) some or all of the expenditure you incurred to acquire it cannot be valued; or c) you did not deal at arm's length with the other entity in connection with the acquisition. Taxation Ruling IT 2540 examines the CGT implications of a disposal of a partnership interest. Though it is expressed in terms of the former CGT provisions (of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 ) the discussion is still relevant for the purposes of the ITAA 1997. At paragraphs 13 and 14 it states: …In other cases, it will generally be accepted, provided the evidence reasonably supports the conclusion that the partners are dealing with each other at arm's length. Any consideration paid or received on the acquisition or disposal of an interest in the partnership will be used for Part IIIA (CGT) purposes in determining the cost base or disposal proceeds of the interests in the partnership assets that the partnership interest represents. This will mean that if, for example, the partnership arrangement is such that no amount is payable for the acquisition or disposal of goodwill, it will be accepted for the purposes of Part IIIA (CGT) that the value of the goodwill is nil. In the case of large professional partnerships, where the partners' dealings with each other are at arm's length, it will only be where consideration is paid by a partner on entering the partnership or where a partner receives a payment on leaving the partnership that Part IIIA (CGT) will have any practical effect. Where consideration is neither paid by a person on entering the partnership, nor received on retirement from the partnership, the partner will not realise a capital gain or incur a capital loss on the disposal of particular assets. However, as noted above, the admission or retirement of a partner may affect the proportionate ownership of the partnership assets by the individual partners and therefore may affect the extent of a continuing partner's interest in the partnership. This would be relevant in the event of a subsequent disposal of the partnership assets for consideration, or where consideration is paid to a partner on retirement from the partnership. Accordingly, where the evidence demonstrates that such partnership interest dealings are at arm's length, the Commissioner will accept where there is no consideration, that the market value of the partnership interest is nil. In order for the treatment mentioned in IT 2540 to apply, the Commissioner expects that the following conditions, listed at paragraph 18 of Taxation Determination TD 2011/26 Income tax: capital gains tax: if a share in a 'no goodwill' incorporated professional practice is disposed of for no consideration, will the Commissioner accept, for the purposes of calculating the market value of the share upon a possible application of subsection 116-30(1) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 that the goodwill of the company can be taken to have no value?, (TD 2011/26) must be satisfied. These conditions are: i. the partners in the partnership are all natural person practitioners who hold a fractional interest in the 'no goodwill' partnership; ii. the acquisition or disposal of an interest in the partnership must be reflective of that person's status as an active practitioner in the practice and held by that person both legally and beneficially; in this context 'active partner' will include managing partners who do not undertake client work and non-practitioner consultants (for example legal counsel in an accounting firm); iii. the partnership has capital which reflects merely a nil or immaterial value for goodwill, except in circumstances where the partnership has taken over another practice with goodwill, and such acquired goodwill remains on the partnership's books; in that circumstance, provided the partners cease to recognise that goodwill in dealings between themselves for the admission and exit of partners this condition will be satisfied; iv. the partnership adopts an agreement that regulates the basis for admission and exit of partners and the amount that is paid for it; and v. the partnership agreement provides that no or an immaterial payment is to be made for acquiring a partnership interest, disposing of a partnership interest or any change to the profit distribution entitlements attached to an interest in the partnership, in respect of goodwill. In this instance, the Commissioner accepts your arrangement meets the relevant requirements under IT 2540 and will apply the treatment mentioned in IT 2540 to the acquisition and disposal of partnership interests that occur on 1 July 2015 during the natural ebb and flow of partners into and out of the partnership. This will mean that the Commissioner will accept that the market value of the consideration paid on acquisition of the partnership interest will be nil, and likewise, the consideration received on disposal of the partnership interest will also be nil. Application of Part IVA Part IVA of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (ITAA 1936) is a general anti-avoidance provision that can apply in certain circumstances. Part IVA gives the Commissioner the power to cancel a 'tax benefit' (or part of a 'tax benefit') that has been obtained, or would, but for section 177F of the ITAA 1936, be obtained, by a taxpayer in connection with a scheme to which Part IVA applies. In broad terms, Part IVA will apply where the following requirements are satisfied: • there is a scheme (see section 177A); • a taxpayer has obtained, or would but for section 177F obtain, a tax benefit in connection with the scheme (see section 177C); and • the dominant purpose of a person who entered into or carried out the scheme, or any part of the scheme, was to enable the relevant taxpayer to obtain a tax benefit in connection with the scheme, or to enable the relevant taxpayer and another taxpayer or other taxpayers each to obtain a tax benefit in connection with the scheme (paragraph 177D(b)). In considering whether Part IVA would specifically apply to an assignment of a partnership interest, Taxation Ruling IT 2501, at paragraph 9, states: Valid assignments on all fours with the Everett or Galland decisions will be accepted for tax purposes and will not be regarded as caught by section 260 or Part IVA. The facts identified in this Ruling application are assumed to be 'on all fours' with the facts considered by the Court in the income year considered in Everett. Accordingly, the Commissioner will not apply Part IVA, in the year to which this ruling applies, to deny any tax benefit arising as a result of the assignment.

Relevant facts: You are an equity partner in the Partnership. | The Partnership carries on a business as a firm with approximately X partners. | The Partnership operates on a 'no goodwill' basis. This means that incoming partners are not required to pay any amount in relation to goodwill being acquired and exiting partners are not entitled to receive any payment in recognition of goodwill. This is set out in the Partnership Agreement. | You are considering entering into an agreement under which you will commence holding a yet to be determined portion of your interest in the Partnership as trustee for the Company in a manner consistent with that considered by the High Court in Federal Commissioner of Taxation v. Everett [1980] HCA 6; (1980) 143 CLR 440 ( Everett ). The relationship will be irrevocable. | The Company is a private company wholly owned by your family discretionary trust (the Trust). The Trust was established for the benefit of your family. | You intend to engage the services of an expert valuer to ascertain the market value of your interest in the Partnership. | Assumptions: Documentation giving effect to the assignment will be prepared in a manner which is consistent with and which provides the same legal effect as the assignments considered in Everett and Federal Commissioner of Taxation v. Galland [1986] HCA 83; (1986) 162 CLR 408 ( Galland ). Documentation is yet to be completed at the time of the application. | A trust relationship will come into existence consistent with the decision in Everett . | The valuation will be completed consistent with the decision of the Supreme Court of Western Australia in Reynolds v. Commissioner of State Taxation (WA) 86 ATC 4528 ( Reynolds ). The valuation will be prepared on this basis to comply with the Commissioner's statement at paragraph 28 of Taxation Ruling IT 2540 Income tax: capital gains: application to disposals of partnership assets and partnership interests as follows: | Where an Everett assignment is not made at arm's length, the valuation method adopted in Reynolds' case will usually be the appropriate method for determining the market value of the assigned partnership interest for the purposes of Part IIIA. Broadly, this will involve the determination of the price that a "hypothetical buyer" would pay for the assigned partnership interest having regard to the value of the right to the future income of the partnership which is attached to the interest. | On 1 July 2015 (after the Company commences to hold a beneficial interest in the Partnership): | • a yet to be determined number of new partners will be admitted to the Partnership, these Partners will not be required to pay any consideration for goodwill, and | • a yet to be determined number of existing partners will exit the Partnership, these partners will not be entitled to any consideration in respect of goodwill. | The admission and exit of partners on 1 July 2015 will occur as part of the normal ebb and flow of carrying on business as a large professional services partnership.