Private ruling: Non-commercial losses - Commissioner's discretion
Published: October 2012
Ruling period: Year ended 30 June 2012
Date scheme commenced: On or after 1 January 2011

Ruling: Q1: Will the Commissioner exercise the discretion in paragraph 35-55(1)(b) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997) (lead time) to allow you to include any losses from your real estate activities in your calculation of taxable income for the 2011-12 income year? | A1: No.


Relevant legislative provisions: Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Paragraph 35-55(1)(b). | Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Subsection 35-10(2). | Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Subsection 35-10(4). | Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 35-30. | Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 35-35. | Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 35-45. | Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 995-1.

Reasons for decision: Summary: The Commissioner will not exercise the discretion in paragraph 35-55(1)(b) of the ITAA 1997 (lead time) to allow you to include any losses from your real estate activities in your calculation of taxable income for the 2011-12 income year. We do not consider that there is anything inherent in the nature of your business activity that prevented you from being able to satisfy one of the tests in the 2011-12 income year. You are in the process of building up your clients in this time. | Detailed Reasoning - Detailed reasoning: Division 35 of the ITAA 1997 prevents losses of individuals or individuals in a partnership from non-commercial business activities being offset against other assessable income in the year the loss is incurred. The loss is deferred. The deferred losses may be offset in later years against profits from the activity. The losses may also be offset against other income if the income requirement and one of the tests are satisfied, or if the Commissioner exercises a discretion (special circumstances or lead time). Division 35 sets out an income requirement and a series of tests to determine whether a business activity is treated as being non-commercial. | Detailed Reasoning - Income Requirement: The income requirement applies to the 2010-11 and following years and you will satisfy the income requirement if the sum of the following is less than $250,000 in the income year: · Your taxable income for that year · Your reportable fringe benefits total for that year · Your reportable superannuation contributions for that year, and · Your total net investment losses for that year | Detailed Reasoning - Tests: In broad terms, the tests require: (a) at least $20,000 of assessable income in that year from the business activity (b) the business activity results in a taxation profit in three of the past five income years (c) at least $500,000 of real property, or an interest in real property, (excluding any private dwelling) is used on a continuing basis in carrying on the business activity in that year, or (d) at least $100,000 of certain other assets (excluding cars, motor cycles and similar vehicles) are used on a continuing basis in carrying on the business activity in that year. | Detailed Reasoning - Are you carrying on a business?: Your activities will only be subject to these provisions if it is carried on as a business. You stated in your private ruling application that your activity was carried on as a business. This issue has been considered in the previous year and you were considered to be carrying on a business. You have indicated that there is no major change to your activity, therefore it will be treated as a business. | Detailed Reasoning - Application of the Commissioner's discretion (lead time) to this arrangement: As your activities have commenced, and are carried on as a business, they are subject to Division 35 of the ITAA 1997. You have stated that none of the four tests were, or will be, satisfied in the 2011-12 year. As no test was, or will be satisfied, for the 2011-12 income year, losses in this income year are to be deferred to a future income year, unless the Commissioner exercises one of the two discretions. The special circumstances discretion is not applicable to your situation as there has not been the impact of any special circumstances outside your control and will not be considered further. The lead time discretion may be exercised for one or more income years where: (a) the business activity has started to be carried on; and for those years: (i) because of its nature it has not satisfied, or will not satisfy, one of the tests, and (ii) there is an expectation that the business activity will either satisfy one of the tests or produce a taxation profit within a period that is commercially viable for the industry concerned. The note to this paragraph states: Note: This paragraph is intended to cover a business activity that has a lead time between the commencement of the activity and the production of any assessable income. For example, an activity involving the planting of hardwood trees for harvest, where many years would pass before the activity could reasonably be expected to produce income. The type of feature contemplated by the phrase 'because of its nature', in the context in which it appears, is that referred to in the note quoted above. That is, that there is an inherent or innate feature of the activity resulting in an inability to produce income in the year of commencement and (in most cases) a number of years thereafter. This is borne out further by paragraph 1.51 of the Explanatory Memorandum for the New Business Tax System (Integrity Measures) Act 2000 , which states: This arm [paragraph 35-55(1)(b)] of the safeguard discretion will ensure that the loss deferral rule in section 35-10 does not adversely impact on taxpayers who have commenced to carry on activities which by their nature require a number of years to produce assessable income. Examples of activities which would fall into this category are forestry, viticulture and certain horticultural activities. The note and the passage cited above do not support any view that the discretion should be exercised for any start-up activity that is yet, for example, to satisfy the assessable income test simply because of the small scale on which it was started, or because a client base is being built up. Those sorts of constraints on being able to satisfy that test are far removed from the specific one referred to in the note and the Explanatory Memorandum. You satisfy the income requirement in the 2011-12 income year as your adjusted taxable income will be under $250,000 for that income year. This ruling is based on the assumption that you were unable to satisfy any of the four tests outlined above in 2011-12 income year. You have not derived any income in the 2011-12 income year. We do not consider that there is anything inherent in the nature of your business activity that prevented you from being able to satisfy one of the tests in the 2011-12 income year. You are in the process of building up your clients in this time. Consequently, the Commissioner will not exercise his discretion for lead time for the 2011-12 income year. Any losses from your activity will need to be deferred to a future year.

Please check this edited version to be sure that there are no details remaining that you think may allow you to be identified. If you have any concerns about this ruling you wish to discuss, you will find our contact details in the fact sheet. | Relevant facts: You conduct a business property. | The data base of clientele continues to grow through the advertising of your services. | You worked full time in the business for part of the year and worked one week in three for the remainder of the year. | You have incurred expenses in conducting the business for stationary, magazines, food and accommodation, computer expenses, professional fees, travelling, phone, motor vehicle, postage and course fees. You have not derived any income during this period, so the business activity has run at a loss. | You do not meet any of the four business tests for the purposes of the non-commercial losses provisions in the 2011-12 income year. | Your adjusted taxable income for non-commercial losses provisions is less than $250,000.