Private ruling: Non-commercial losses
Published: January 2014
Ruling period: Year ended 30 June 2013 | Year ending 30 June 2014
Date scheme commenced: 1 July 2012

Ruling: Q1: Will the Commissioner exercise the discretion in paragraph 35-55(1)(a) of the ITAA 1997 to allow you to include any losses from your business activity in your calculation of taxable income for the 2012-13 and 2013-14 financial years? | A1: Yes.

Relevant facts and circumstances: This ruling is based on the facts stated in the description of the scheme that is set out below. If your circumstances are materially different from these facts, this ruling has no effect and you cannot rely on it. The fact sheet has more information about relying on your private ruling. You commenced a primary production business on a property on 1 July 20XX. You budgeted a turnover of over $X in the relevant financial year. Your enterprise is set up to purchase young livestock for fattening and sale. You have provided a letter from an industry expert stating that you could have achieved the budgeted turnover if you'd had good seasonal conditions. Very dry weather conditions prevented you from meeting your budgeted turnover. A number of head died from drought from your initial purchase. You are hand feeding the livestock. You have requested two years of the Commissioner's discretion as you believe the dry conditions will continue. You satisfy the <$250,000 income requirement set out in subsection 35-10(2E) of the ITAA 1997.

Relevant legislative provisions: Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 subsection 35-10(1). | Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 subsection 35-10(2). | Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 subsection 35-10(2E). | Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 paragraph 35-55(1)(a).

Reasons for decision: Summary: For the 2009-10 and later financial years, Division 35 of the ITAA 1997 will apply to defer a non-commercial loss from a business activity unless: · you satisfy the income requirement and you pass one of the four tests · the exceptions apply, or · the Commissioner exercises his discretion. In your situation, none of the exceptions would apply and although you satisfy the income requirement, you do not meet any of the four tests in the financial year(s) under consideration. Your losses are therefore subject to the deferral rule, unless the Commissioner exercises his discretion. The relevant discretion may be exercised for the financial year in question where your business activity is affected by special circumstances outside your control. 'Special circumstances' are those circumstances which are sufficiently different to distinguish them from the circumstances that occur in the normal course of conducting a business activity, including drought, flood, bushfire or some other natural disaster. For individuals who satisfy the income requirement, special circumstances are those which have materially affected their business activity, causing it not to meet any of the four tests. In this context, the Commissioner may exercise this discretion for the financial year(s) in question where, but for the special circumstances the activity would have passed at least one of the tests. Having regard to your full circumstances, it is accepted that your business activity was affected by special circumstances outside your control and that these prevented you meeting one of the four tests. Consequently the Commissioner will exercise his discretion in the relevant financial years.