Private ruling: Withholding tax exemption
Date of advice: 27 March 2025
Published: 19 May 2025
Ruling period: Year ending 30 June 20XX | Year ending 30 June 20XX | Year ending 30 June 20XX | Year ending 30 June 20XX | Year ending 30 June 20XX | Year ending 30 June 20XX | Year ending 30 June 20XX | Year ending 30 June 20XX | Year ending 30 June 20XX | Year ending 30 June 20XX | Year ending 30 June 20XX | Year ending 30 June 20XX | Year ending 30 June 20XX
Date scheme commenced: 1 July 20XX

Ruling: Q1: Does Article X of the Double Tax Convention (DT Convention) apply to exempt Entity A from withholding tax on dividend income received from Australian resident companies through the ABC Trust and DEF Trust? | A1: Yes. | Q2: Does Article Y of the DT Convention apply to exempt Entity A from withholding tax on interest income received from Australian resident companies through the ABC Trust and DEF Trust? | A2: Yes.

Relevant facts and circumstances: 1. Entity A is a fund, whose products are only investable by pension funds providing compulsory occupational pensions to all individuals and employers who request affiliation, provided Entity A meet the statutory requirements of the foreign country. 2. Entity A was established outside of Australia and is domiciled outside of Australia. 3. The object of Entity A is the joint investment and management of assets for occupational pension schemes. 4. Entity A's assets are to be used exclusively for the purpose of pension provision. 5. Entity A's Board is responsible for the management and supervision, including strategic and business policy decisions, as well as fundamental resolutions regarding the investment and management of the pension funds entrusted to it. 6. The members of the Board are all non-residents of Australia. The central management and control of Entity A is carried on outside of Australia, by entities who are not Australian residents. 7. Entity A does not carry on a business through a permanent establishment situated in Australia and does not perform independent personal services from a fixed base in Australia. 8. Entity A is supervised by the Entity C. 9. Entity C is an independent supervisory authority whose members are appointed by the X Council that is, amongst other things, responsible for supervising investment funds. 10. Entity A is a resident of a foreign country for tax purposes and is treated as a company for tax purposes as confirmed by the Certificate of Tax Residence and Tax Exemption 202X from the Tax Authorities. 11. Entity A is exempt from tax in foreign country as confirmed by the Tax Exemption document from the Tax Authorities. Australian investments of Entity A 12. Entity A has invested into Australian resident trusts (collectively, the Trusts). 13. The Trusts are stapled trusts and are AMITs. 14. The Trust is a public trading trust which is taxed as a company. 15. Entity A invested into the Trusts in its own name and legal holding upon which it derives dividend and interest income. 16. Entity A is not involved in the day-to-day management of the business of the Trusts. 17. Entity A has no rights to appoint any person to any board, committee or similar, either directly or indirectly, of the Trusts. 18. Entity A has no ability to direct or influence the operation of the Trusts outside of the ordinary rights conferred by the equity interest held. 19. Entity A owns less than 1% of each trust and therefore holds less than 10% of the voting power in the Trusts.

Relevant legislative provisions: Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 section 128B | International Tax Agreements Act 1953 subsection 3AAA(1) | International Tax Agreements Act 1953 subsection 5(1) Convention between Australia and the Avoidance of Double Taxation with respect to Taxes and Income, with Protocol

Reasons for decision: Summary: Yes, Article X of the DT Convention applies to exempt Entity A from withholding tax on unfranked dividends received from Australian resident companies through the Trusts. If the dividend is fully or partly franked, there is no withholding tax paid on the franked amount of the dividend and therefore no exemption available. | Detailed Reasoning - Detailed reasoning: Generally, non-residents who derive Australian dividend or interest income are liable to pay withholding tax on that income (see section 128B of ITAA 1936 and subsections 128B(1)-(5) of the ITAA 1936). However, in determining liability to Australian tax on Australian source income derived by a non-resident, it is necessary to consider not only the income tax laws but also any applicable Convention or Double Taxation Agreement contained in the Agreements Act. Section 4 of the Agreements Act incorporates that Act with the ITAA 1936 and the ITAA 1997 so that those Acts are read as one. The Agreements Act effectively overrides the ITAA 1936 and ITAA 1997 where there are inconsistent provisions (except for some limited provisions). As Entity A meets the requirements of Article C of the DT Convention and is therefore subject to its application. | Detailed Reasoning - DT Convention - application to dividend income: Dividend income Article X of the DT Convention is the relevant provision in relation to dividend income. | Detailed Reasoning - 1. There are dividends that are paid by companies that are residents of Australia: A company is defined in Article Z of the DT Convention as "any body corporate or any entity which is treated as a company or body corporate for tax purposes". Entity A holds units in the Trusts. As a public trading trust, Trust A is taxed as a company. Therefore, Trust A is a company for the purposes of the DT Convention. Consequently, the unfranked dividends received from Trust A by Entity A are paid by a company that is a resident of Australia. As Trusts B & C are not taxed as companies, if they have received unfranked dividends from investments in underlying Australian tax resident companies and distribute it to Entity A, these dividends will retain their character and will also meet the requirements of Article X of the DT Convention subject to provision of evidence that an unfranked dividend has been paid by Trusts B & C and an amount of withholding tax has been withheld. If a dividend is franked, then no withholding tax is paid and cannot be reclaimed (see below). | Detailed Reasoning - 2. The beneficial owner of the dividends: The term 'beneficial owner' is not defined in the DT Convention. Paragraph 12.1 of the 2017 OECD Commentaries on Article 10 states: ... The term "beneficial owner" is therefore not used in a narrow technical sense (such as the meaning it has under the trust law of many common law countries), rather, it should be understood in its context, in particular in relation to the words "paid ... to a resident", and in light of the object and purposes of the Convention, including avoiding double taxation and the prevention of fiscal evasion and avoidance. The OECD Commentaries provide an example of using the term 'beneficial owner' in a narrow technical sense in a footnote to paragraph 12.1 regarding a 'meaning it has under the trust law of many common law countries': ... where the trustees of a discretionary trust do not distribute dividends earned during a given period, these trustees, acting in their capacity as such (or the trust, if recognised as a separate taxpayer), could constitute the beneficial owners of such income for the purposes of Article 10 even if they are not the beneficial owners under the relevant trust law. Therefore, the term 'beneficial owner' should be used in a purposive sense in light of the operation of the DT Convention. Paragraph 12.4 of the OECD Commentaries informs that the 'beneficial owner' can be found through identifying the entity which has the unconstrained right to use and enjoy the dividend income: ... Where the recipient of a dividend does have the right to use and enjoy the dividend unconstrained by a contractual or legal obligation to pass on the payment received to another person, the recipient is the "beneficial owner" of that dividend. It should also be noted that Article 10 refers to the beneficial owner of a dividend as opposed to the owner of the shares, which may be different in some cases. Further, the OECD Commentaries at paragraphs 12.2 to 12.3 provides examples of situations where agents, nominees, and conduit companies acting as a fiduciary or administrator on account of the interested parties would not be the 'beneficial owner' of the income despite being the direct recipient of the income. In particular, paragraph 12.4 further states: In these various examples (agent, nominee, conduit company acting as a fiduciary or administrator), the direct recipient of the dividend is not the "beneficial owner" because that recipient's right to use and enjoy the dividend is constrained by a contractual obligation to pass on the payment received to another person. Through its direct investment in the Trusts in its own name and legal holdings, Entity A is the beneficial owner of the income which it derives from units it holds in the Trusts. As such, Entity A will be the beneficial owner of the dividends. | Detailed Reasoning - 3. Entity A is a pension scheme and its investment income is exempt from foreign country tax: Entity A is a pension scheme pursuant to the DT Convention, and is exempt from tax in foreign country. Therefore, this condition is satisfied. | Detailed Reasoning - 4. Entity A holds directly no more than 10 per cent of the voting power in the company paying the dividends: Entity A directly holds no more than 10 per cent of the voting power in the Trusts. Therefore, this condition is satisfied. 5. Entity A does not carry on a business through a permanent establishment in Australia or perform independent personal services from a fixed base in Australia. Entity A does not carry on a business through a permanent establishment situated in Australia and does not perform independent personal services from a fixed base in Australia. As such, the application of Article X of the DT Convention will not be limited by Article X(AB) of the DT Convention in these circumstances. Therefore, this condition is satisfied. 6. The Australian resident company that pays dividends is not a dual resident of both Australia and foreign country, pursuant to Article E of the DT Convention. Article X(AC) of the DT Convention operates to limit the application of subparagraph AD of Article X of the DT Convention in circumstances where the company paying the dividend is a dual resident under the DT Convention. It is assumed that the Trusts are not dual residents of both Australia and foreign country, pursuant to paragraph Article E of the DT Convention. As such, the application of Article X of the DT Convention will not be limited by Article X(AC) of the DT Convention in these circumstances. Therefore, this condition is satisfied. | Detailed Reasoning - Conclusion: Entity A is a pension scheme whose investment income is exempt from tax. In addition, Entity A is the beneficial owner of dividends paid by companies that are Australian residents from investments held in its own name and legal holding. Furthermore, Entity A holds directly no more than 10 per cent of the voting power in the Australian company paying dividends. Therefore, Article X of the DT Convention will operate to exempt Entity A from withholding tax on unfranked dividends paid by the Trusts in respect of units held in its own name and legal holding, such that the dividends shall not be taxed in Australia. | Detailed Reasoning - Franked dividends: Section 128B of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (ITAA 1936) imposes liability to withholding tax on income derived by a non-resident that consists of dividend income (subsection 128B(1) of the ITAA 1936) as well as other income prescribed in that section. Paragraph 128B(3)(ga) of the ITAA 1936 prescribes that section 128B of the ITAA 1936 will not apply to income that consists of the franked part of a dividend. Therefore, if dividends paid by the Trusts are franked, then there is no withholding tax claimable as a refund. | Summary: Yes, Article Y of the DT Convention will apply to the interest income paid by the Trusts to Entity A such that the interest income shall not be taxed in Australia. | Detailed Reasoning - Detailed reasoning: DT Convention - application to taxes on interest and dividends Generally, non-residents who derive Australian dividend or interest income are liable to pay withholding tax on that income (see section 128B of ITAA 1936 and subsections 128B(1)-(5) of the ITAA 1936). However, in determining liability to Australian tax on Australian source income derived by a non-resident, it is necessary to consider not only the income tax laws but also any applicable Convention or Double Taxation Agreement contained in the Agreements Act. Section 4 of the Agreements Act incorporates that Act with the ITAA 1936 and the ITAA 1997 so that those Acts are read as one. The Agreements Act effectively overrides the ITAA 1936 and ITAA 1997 where there are inconsistent provisions (except for some limited provisions). As Entity A meets the requirements of Article Y of the DT Convention and is therefore subject to its application. | Detailed Reasoning - DT Convention - application to interest income: Article Y of the DT Convention is the relevant provision in relation to interest income. For Article Y of the DT Convention to apply to Entity A, in respect of an exemption from withholding tax on interest income, it must satisfy the following: • there is interest that arises in Australia • Entity A is the beneficial owner of the interest and derives the interest • Entity A is a resident of foreign country, and • Entity A is a pension scheme and its investment income is exempt from tax. | Detailed Reasoning - Interest that arises in Australia: Entity A holds interests the Australian trusts. The Trusts derive interest income from its Australian debt investments. All interest income arising from the Australian investments is paid by Australian residents for the purposes of Australian tax, and all such income is not connected to a permanent establishment or a fixed base situated outside Australia. Accordingly, pursuant to Article Y of the DT Convention, interest income arises in Australia. Therefore, interest arises in Australia from the Australian investments held by Entity A accordance with Article Y of the DT Convention. | Detailed Reasoning - The beneficial owner of the interest and derives the interest: Entity A is the beneficial owner of the interest income which it derives from its holdings in the Trusts. As such, it will be the beneficial owner of the interest. | Detailed Reasoning - Resident of Foreign Country: Entity A is a resident of the foreign country as it satisfies the definition of a 'resident of a Contracting State' and was established in the foreign country. Pension scheme and investment income is exempt from tax Entity A is a pension scheme, pursuant to the DT Convention, and is exempt from tax in the foreign country. | Detailed Reasoning - Other provisions of Article Y of the DT Convention: Entity A does not meet any of the restrictions on the availability of the exemptions regarding its debt investments held in its own name and legal holding listed under Article Y. Consequently, the restrictions prescribed in the DT Convention relevant to the availability of the exemptions from income and withholding tax on interest income discussed above will not be applicable in respect of the interest income derived by the Entity A. | Detailed Reasoning - Conclusion: Entity A is a pension scheme whose investment income is exempt from tax. In addition, it derives interest income from Australian debt investments held through its holdings in the Trusts. As none of the restrictions prescribed in the DT Convention regarding the availability of the exemptions from tax on interest income apply, Article Y of the DT Convention will operate to exempt Entity A from withholding tax on interest paid to Entity A by the Trusts.