Private ruling: Deductibility of land tax arrears incurred on a rental property.
Date of advice: 24 October 2018
Published: December 2018
Ruling period: 1 July 20XX to 30 June 20XX | 1 July 20XX to 30 June 20XX | 1 July 20XX to 30 June 20XX | 1 July 20XX to 30 June 20XX | 1 July 20XX to 30 June 20XX | 1 July 20XX to 30 June 20XX | 1 July 20XX to 30 June 20XX | 1 July 20XX to 30 June 20XX | 1 July 20XX to 30 June 20XX | 1 July 20XX to 30 June 20XX
Date scheme commenced: 21 July 20XX

Ruling: Q1: Is the fixed charge tax deductible under section 8-1 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997)? | A1: Yes | Q2: Is the penalty tax deductible under section 8-1 of the ITAA 1997? | A2: No | Q3: Is the interest tax deductible under section 8-1 of the ITAA 1997? | A3: No | Q4: Is the interest on the loan taken out to pay the debt fully deductible under section 8-1 of the ITAA 1997? | A4: No | Q5: If some or all of these items are tax deductible, are they deductible in the same year in which the quarter’s land tax (upon which the charge is based) is deductible? | A5: Yes

Relevant facts and circumstances: The taxpayers own a property. It was the family home until they relocated and it was subsequently rented. The taxpayers were unaware of an obligation to pay land tax. Some years later the relevant authority, who had only recently become aware of the fact that the property was rented issued a land tax assessment to the taxpayers. The assessment was for an amount which was paid by the taxpayers. On objection it was subsequently reduced and a refund was paid. This comprises: (i) Land tax arrears (ii) Fixed charge (iii) Penalty (iv) Interest The taxpayers took out a mortgage on the property in order to pay the debt by the due date.

Relevant legislative provisions: Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 section 8-1 | Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 section 26-5

Reasons for decision: Summary: You can claim a deduction for local government rates and levies for the period your property is rented or is available for rent. The fixed charge is merely a component of the amount of rates you pay for a standard property. The fixed charge is deductible under s 8-1 of the ITAA 1997 if and to the extent to which it is incurred in gaining or producing the assessable income or in carrying on a business for that purpose. The deduction is not allowed to the extent to which it is of a capital, private or domestic nature or incurred in gaining or producing exempt income. Any penalty component of the land tax assessment is not deductible as per section 26-5 of the ITAA 1997. You are not entitled to a deduction, otherwise allowable under section 8-1 of the ITAA 1997, for a penalty imposed in accordance with a State law. This is so, no matter how that penalty is described. The interest on the loan taken out to pay the liability which was raised is not an allowable deduction under section 8-1 of ITAA 1997. The loan was not incurred in gaining or producing the assessable income as the funds were borrowed to clear an existing liability. There is therefore no nexus between taking out the loan and the derivation of assessable income. In addition to this interest expenses are not considered borrowing expenses. Taxation Ruling TR 95/25 Income tax: deductions for interest under section 8-1 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 following FC of T v. Roberts; FC of T v. Smith states at paragraph 3 that the interest expense must have a sufficient connection with the operations or activities which more directly gain or produce the taxpayer's assessable income and not be of a capital, private or domestic nature. It also states interest on borrowed funds will not be deductible simply because it can be said to preserve assessable income producing assets. The borrowing neither produced assessable income nor will it be expected to produce assessable income. The loan repaid an existing liability. The deduction is therefore not allowed. Taxation Ruling TR 97/7 summarises various propositions of the Courts about when a loss or outgoing is 'incurred' for the purposes of section 8-1 of the ITAA 1997. The ruling states (at paragraph 5), 'As a broad guide, you incur an outgoing at the time you owe a present money debt that you cannot escape.' The Courts have described this in various ways: as having a 'presently existing liability'; as being 'definitively committed' or 'completely subjected' to the outgoing in spite of the fact that it remains unpaid. Another requirement is that the amount of the liability is ascertained or reasonably capable of estimation. Deductibility under section 8-1 also depends on the outgoing being 'properly referable' to the income year in which the deduction is sought ( Coles Myer Finance Pty Ltd v. Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1993) 176 CLR 640; 93 ATC 4214 at 4222; (1993) 25 ATR 95 at 105). In the present circumstances, you incurred a liability to pay land tax under the provisions of the state legislation at the start of each calendar year for which the land tax was payable. You were 'definitively committed' or 'completely subjected' to the debt at that time, even though unaware of it. As the liability to pay land tax was ascertainable in the year to which the assessment giving rise to the liability relates, land tax payable was incurred in that year ( Case B5 70 ATC 24; 15 CTBR (NS) Case 67 ). The Federal Court confirmed this principle, in the context of payroll tax, in Layala Enterprises Pty Ltd (in liq) v. Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1998) 86 FCR 348; 98 ATC 4858; (1998) 39 ATR 502. In these circumstances, you incurred the land tax expenses for the purposes of section 8-1 of the ITAA 1997 in each income year for which each land tax liability was payable, and not in the income year in which the arrears were paid. To summarise, a deduction is allowable for the fixed cost; however a deduction is not allowed for the penalty, interest and loan taken out to pay the liability.