Private ruling: Main residence exemption
Date of advice: 24 September 2015
Published: September 2015
Ruling period: Year ending 30 June 2016
Date scheme commenced: 1 July 2015

Ruling: Q1: Will the Commissioner exercise his discretion under subsection 118-195(1) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997) and allow an extension of time to the two year period? | A1: Yes.

Relevant facts and circumstances: This ruling is based on the facts stated in the description of the scheme that is set out below. If your circumstances are materially different from these facts, this ruling has no effect and you cannot rely on it. The fact sheet has more information about relying on your private ruling. You and your sibling are joint executors of your parent's estate. Your parent passed away in mid-20XX. Your parent purchased a house (the property) prior to September 1985. It was their main residence. It has not been used to produce assessable income. The Commissioner has previously issued you with a private ruling exercising his discretion to allow an extension of time to the two year period until the end of 20YY. There was a massive rain, hail and wind storm caused damage to the property. The property was in a narrow corridor where extensive damage was done to many hundreds of buildings. Damaged caused to the property included roof sheeting, windows, awnings, wall paint and water damage to ceiling and floors. Insurance cover undertook repairs but because of the number of properties that were damaged, labour and supplies were in short supply. Labour had to be imported from other states to handle the workload. The property was completely cleaned and sold. Settlement occurred in mid-20ZZ.

Relevant legislative provisions: Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 118-195.

Reasons for decision: Summary: The Commissioner is able to apply his discretion under subsection 118-195(1) of the ITAA 1997 and allow an extension to the two year time limit. | Detailed Reasoning - Detailed reasoning: Section 118-195 of the ITAA 1997 allows an individual to disregard a capital gain or capital loss made from a Capital Gains Tax event (ie. sale of the property) that happens in relation to a dwelling where: The ownership of the dwelling passed to you as the beneficiary of a deceased person's estate, The deceased person died after 20 August 1996, The deceased acquired the dwelling prior to 20 September 1985, and The dwelling was the deceased person's main residence just before death. You fit into the above requirements. Therefore, you may be eligible to disregard the capital gains tax if: • you dispose of your interest in the dwelling within two years of the deceased's death, or • the dwelling is your main residence from the date of death until the time your ownership ends. The two year time period to dispose of the property expired in mid-20VV. Therefore, you will only be able to disregard the capital gain from the sale of the property if the Commissioner extends the time period. The following is a non-exhaustive list of situations in which the Commissioner would be expected to exercise the discretion: • the ownership of a dwelling or a will is challenged, • the complexity of a deceased estate delays the completion of administration of the estate, • a trustee or beneficiary is unable to attend to the deceased estate due to unforeseen or serious personal circumstances arising during the two year period (eg the taxpayer or a family member has a severe illness or injury), or • settlement of a contract of sale over the dwelling is unexpectedly delayed or falls through for reasons outside the beneficiary or trustee's control. In determining whether or not to grant an extension the Commissioner is expected to consider whether and to what extent the dwelling is used to produce assessable income and how long the trustee or beneficiary held it. In this case: • a massive storm caused damage to the house, and other buildings in the suburb. • Due to the number of properties damaged, labour and supplies were in short supply. Labour had to be imported from other states to handle the workload. • The property was sold and settled in mid-20ZZ. • The property was never used to produce assessable income. Having considered the relevant facts, the Commissioner is able to apply his discretion under subsection 118-195(1) of the ITAA 1997 and allow an extension to the two year time limit.