Private ruling: Compensation payments
Date of advice: 27 January 2022
Published: April 2022
Ruling period: Year ended 30 June 20XX to Year ending 30 June 20XX
Date scheme commenced: 1 July 20XX

Ruling: Q1: Will the receipt of the Access Fee be ordinary assessable income under section 6-5 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997)? | A1: Yes. | Q2: Is the Works Fee paid to the landowner compensation for permanent damage to, or a permanent reduction in the value of, the underlying land, thereby reducing the cost base of the Land by the amount equal to the Works Fee? | A2: Yes. | Q3: Is the Other Specified Fee paid to the landowner compensation for permanent damage to, or a permanent reduction in the value of, the underlying land, thereby reducing the cost base of the Land by the amount equal to the Other Specified Fee? | A3: Yes. | Q4: Will the receipt of the Easement Fee be capital proceeds in relation to a capital gains tax (CGT) event D1 happening due to the granting of the Easement? | A4: Yes. | Q5: Will the Agreement for Lease Reinstatement Licence Fee or the Lease Reinstatement Licence Fee constitute capital proceeds in relation to CGT event D1? | A5: Yes. | Q6: Will the receipt of the Rent by the landowner be ordinary assessable income under section 6-5 of the ITAA 1997? | A6: Yes.

Relevant facts and circumstances: The landowner owns land (the land), used for business activities. The landowner (Entity A) acquired the land, after 20 September 1985. On xxxx, the landowner entered into an Agreement for Lease (AFL) with Entity C. The landowner (Entity A) transferred the land to the new landowner (Entity B) on xxxx. A Deed Poll dated xxxx was executed which provides that the new landowner agrees to be bound by the terms the AFL as if it were the original landowner. A copy of the AFL and other documents have been provided. The specified activities are due to start in xxxx. The land will be impacted by the activities. Pursuant to the Agreement for Lease, Entity C is required to pay the new landowner the following: • Works fee • Other specified fee • Access fee • Rent • Easement fee and • AFL Reinstatement licence fee.

Relevant legislative provisions: Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 6-5 | Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 6-10 | Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 10-5 | Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Subdivision 20-A | Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 102-20 | Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 104-10 | Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 104-35 | Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Division 110 | Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Subsection 116-20

Reasons for decision: Detailed Reasoning - Ordinary income: Subsection 6-5(2) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997) provides that the assessable income of an Australian resident includes the ordinary income derived directly or indirectly from all sources, whether in or out of Australia, during the income year. Ordinary income has generally been held to include three categories, namely, income from rendering personal services, income from property and income from carrying on a business. Other characteristics of income that have evolved from case law include receipts that are earned, are expected, are relied upon, and have an element of periodicity, recurrence or regularity. For income tax purposes, an amount paid to compensate for a loss generally acquires the character of that for which it is substituted ( Federal Commissioner of Taxation v. Dixon (1952) 86 CLR 540; (1952) 5 AITR 443; 10 ATD 82). Compensation payments which substitute income have been held by the courts to be income under ordinary concepts ( Federal Commissioner of Taxation v. Inkster (1989) 24 FCR 53; (1989) 20 ATR 1516; 89 ATC 5142, Tinkler v. FC of T (1979) 10 ATR 411; 79 ATC 4641, and Case Y47 (1991) 22 ATR 3422; 91 ATC 433). On the other hand, if the compensation is paid for the loss of a capital asset or amount then it will be regarded as a capital receipt and not ordinary income. In Scott v. FC of T (1966) 14 ATD 286, Windeyer J expressed the view that whether or not a particular receipt is income depends upon its quality in the hands of the recipient. In your case the access fee is payable annually for the relevant period. This periodic fee relates to the access and use of the land and it is considered that the access fee payments are akin to rent. Therefore, the access fee is considered ordinary assessable income under section 6-5 of the ITAA 1997. Similarly, the rent payments received by you are also assessable under section 6-5 of the ITAA 1997. | Detailed Reasoning - Statutory income: Statutory income is not ordinary income, but is included in assessable income by specific provisions of the income tax law (section 6-10 of the ITAA 1997). These specific provisions are listed in section 10-5 of the ITAA 1997 and include capital gains, which are included in assessable income by virtue of the capital gains tax (CGT) provisions. Whether or not a particular receipt is ordinary income or statutory income depends on its character in the hands of the recipient. For income tax purposes, a compensation amount generally bears the character of that which it is paid to replace. | Detailed Reasoning - Compensation: Taxation Ruling TR 95/35 Income tax: capital gains: treatment of compensation receipts considers the CGT consequences for compensation payments. Why the payment was made is an important factor in determining whether an asset has been disposed of for capital gains tax purposes. TR 95/35 discusses the various scenarios, including: • disposal of the underlying asset, • compensation for permanent damage to, or permanent reduction in value of, the underlying asset, and • disposal of the right to seek compensation. As outlined in the ruling, the Commissioner adopts an "underlying asset'' approach to determine the asset to which the compensation amount is most directly related. In concluding that the underlying asset is the most relevant asset to which an amount of compensation relates, a person must be able to show that the compensation receipt has a direct and substantial link with the underlying asset. If an asset has not been disposed of and has not been permanently damaged or permanently reduced in value by the happening or event which generated the amount of compensation, the taxpayer is not able to demonstrate that link. It follows that the compensation cannot be directly related to that asset. In those cases, the most relevant asset may be the right to seek compensation, or the notional asset. Paragraph 3 of TR 95/35 states that permanent damage or reduction in value does not mean everlasting damage or reduced value, but refers to damage or a reduction in value which will have permanent effect unless some action is taken by the taxpayer to put it right. If an amount of compensation is received wholly in respect of permanent damage suffered to a underlying CGT asset or for a permanent reduction in the value of a underlying CGT asset, and there is no disposal of that underlying CGT asset at the time of the receipt, we consider that the amount represents a recoupment of all or part of the total acquisition costs of the asset. This is so, regardless of whether the compensation is received as one lump-sum or a smaller lump-sum and a series of annual payments. Accordingly, the cost base of the underlying CGT asset will be reduced by the amount of the compensation received for the damage to the underlying CGT asset. No capital gain or loss arises in respect of that underlying CGT asset until it is actually disposed of. If the compensation amount exceeds the total unindexed cost base (including a deemed cost base) of the underlying CGT asset, there are no CGT consequences in respect of the excess compensation amount received. In your case, the compensation payments are not earned by you as they do not relate to services performed or from carrying on a business. Although the payment can be said to be expected, and perhaps relied upon, this expectation does not arise from any personal services performed or business activity undertaken. Furthermore, although the compensation relates to the land, the payment is not akin to rent. The compensation payment relates to the damage to part of the land and is capital in nature. Accordingly, it is not regarded as ordinary income and is therefore not assessable under subsection 6-5(2) of the ITAA 1997. As the compensation payments, being the Works Fee and Other Specified Fee, are paid in respect to the impact of the activities on the land that will cause permanent damage to, or a permanent reduction in the value of the land, and the land has not been disposed of, the cost base of the land will be reduced by the amount of compensation payments received. | Detailed Reasoning - Easement: The granting of an easement creates a right over someone else's land or property. The taxation treatment of a payment for the granting of an easement depends on whether the easement has been created by compulsory acquisition or as a voluntary action. CGT event D1 (section 104-35 of the ITAA 1997) happens when you create a contractual right or other legal or equitable right in another entity. The time of the CGT event D1 is when you enter into the contract or create the other right. A capital gain from a CGT event D1 is not a discount capital gain, as the right is created at the time of the agreement. Taxation Ruling IT 2561 Income tax: capital gains: grants of easements, profits a prendre and licences explains that an easement (or other comparable right) is an asset created at the time it is granted. Taxation Determination TD 2018/15 Income tax: capital gains: does CGT event D1 happen if a taxpayer grants an easement, profit à prendre or licence over an asset? explains that CGT event D1 rather than CGT event A1 happens if a taxpayer grants an easement, profit à prendre or licence over an asset. Under the Agreement for Lease, you will grant an easement to Entity C and receive an easement fee. The easement was not created by a compulsory acquisition, rather as a voluntary action. The easement is a separate CGT asset. CGT event D1 will happen at the time the easement is granted and the easement payment will be considered capital proceeds received as a result of CGT event D1 occurring. | Detailed Reasoning - Licence fee: As confirmed in TD 2018/15, CGT event D1 occurs if you grant a licence to another entity. The reinstatement licence that will be granted to Entity C at the end of the lease period will provide Entity C with the right to access the land for the purpose of restoring the land. It does not provide Entity C with the right of exclusive access or occupation of the land. At the time the landowner grants the reinstatement licence to Entity C, CGT event D1 will happen. The reinstatement licence fee is considered capital proceeds received as a result of CGT event D1 occurring.