Private ruling: Permanent establishment
Published: December 2012

Ruling: A non resident taxpayer asked if it had a permanent establishment in Australia for the purposes of the relevant article within the relevant double tax agreement. | Upon consideration of the relevant facts the Commissioner concluded that the taxpayer had no permanent establishment in Australia under the relevant article within the relevant double tax agreement.




Please check this edited version to be sure that there are no details remaining that you think may allow you to be identified. If you have any concerns about this ruling you wish to discuss, you will find our contact details in the fact sheet.