Ruling period: For the year ended 30 June 2011
Date scheme commenced: 1 July 2010

Ruling: Q1: Did an interdependency relationship exist between you and your adult child (the deceased) in accordance with section 302-200 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997 ) ? Advice/Answer Yes.


Relevant legislative provisions: Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 Section 27AAB. | Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Ch3-Pt3-30-Div302. | Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 302-195. | Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Subsection 302-200(1). | Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Paragraph 302-200(1)(a). | Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Paragraph 302-200(1)(b). | Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Paragraph 302-200(1)(c). | Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Paragraph 302-200(1)(d). | Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Subsection 302-200(2). | Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Paragraph 302-200(2)(a). | Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Paragraph 302-200(2)(b). | Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Paragraph 302-200(2)(c). | Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Subsection 302-200(3). | Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Paragraph 302-200(3)(a). | Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Paragraph 302-200(3)(b). | Income Tax Regulations 1936 Regulation 8A. | Income Tax Regulations 1997 Regulation 302-200.01(2).

Reasons for decision: Summary: It is considered that you and the deceased had an interdependency relationship prior to and at the time of the deceased's death. Therefore, you are a death benefits dependant of the deceased. As you are considered to be a death benefits dependant the superannuation death benefit payable to you will be tax-free and is not included in your assessable income. | Detailed Reasoning - Superannuation death benefits: Division 302 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997), which has replaced former section 27AAB of the of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 , sets out the taxation arrangements that apply to the payment of superannuation death benefits that are made after 30 June 2007. These arrangements depend on whether the person that receives the superannuation death benefit is a dependant of the deceased or not and whether the amount is paid as a lump sum superannuation death benefit or a superannuation income stream death benefit. Where a person receives a superannuation death benefit and that person was a dependant of the deceased, it is not assessable income and is not exempt income. Section 302-195 of the ITAA 1997 defines death benefits dependant as follows: A death benefits dependant , of a person who has died, is: (a) the deceased person's spouse or former spouse; or (b) the deceased person's child, aged less than 18; or (c) any other person with whom the deceased person had an interdependency relationship under section 302-200 just before he or she died; or (d) any other person who was a dependant of the deceased person just before he or she died. | Detailed Reasoning - Interdependency relationship: Under section 302-200(1) of the ITAA 1997 an interdependency relationship is defined as: Two persons (whether or not related by family) have an interdependency relationship under this section if: (a) they have a close personal relationship; and (b) they live together; and (c) one or each of them provides the other with financial support; and (d) one or each of them provides the other with domestic support and personal care. Section 302-200(2) of the ITAA 1997 states: In addition, 2 persons (whether or not related by family) also have an interdependency relationship under this section if: (a) they have a close personal relationship; and (b) they do not satisfy one or more of the requirements of an interdependency relationship mentioned in paragraphs (1)(b), (c) and (d); and (c) the reason they do not satisfy those requirements is that either or both of them suffer from a physical, intellectual or psychiatric disability. Paragraph 302-200(3)(a) of the ITAA 1997, above, states that the regulations may specify the matters that are, or are not, to be taken into account in determining whether 2 persons have an interdependency relationship under subsections 302-200(1) and (2). Paragraph 302-200(3)(b) states that the regulations may specify the circumstances in which 2 persons have, or do not have an interdependency relationship under subsections 302-200(1) and (2). Regulation 302-200.01(2) of the Income Tax Regulations 1997 (ITR 1997) which has replaced former regulation 8A of the Income Tax Regulations 1936 (ITR 1936) states as follows: (a) all of the circumstances of the relationship between the persons, including (where relevant): (i) the duration of the relationship; and (ii) whether or not a sexual relationship exists; and (iii) the ownership, use and acquisition of property; and (iv) the degree of mutual commitment to a shared life; and (v) the care and support of children; and (vi) the reputation and public aspects of the relationship; and (vii) the degree of emotional support; and (viii) the extent to which the relationship is one of mere convenience; and (ix) any evidence suggesting that the parties intend the relationship to be permanent. All of the conditions in subsection 302-200(1) of the ITAA 1997, or alternately both the condition in paragraph 302-200(1)(a) and the condition in subsection 302-200(2), must be satisfied for the taxpayer to be able to claim that he or she has an interdependency relationship. It is proposed to deal with each condition in turn. | Detailed Reasoning - Close personal relationship:: The first requirement to be met is specified in paragraph 302-200(1)(a) of the ITAA 1997. It states that two persons (whether or not related by family) must have a close personal relationship. A detailed explanation of subsection 302-200(1) of the ITAA 1997 is set out in the Supplementary Explanatory Memorandum (SEM) to the Superannuation Legislation Amendment (Choice of Superannuation Funds) Act 2004 which inserted former section 27AAB of the ITAA 1936. In discussing the meaning of close personal relationship the SEM states: 2.12 A close personal relationship will be one that involves a demonstrated and ongoing commitment to the emotional support and well-being of the two parties. 2.13 Indicators of a close personal relationship may include: · the duration of the relationship; · the degree of mutual commitment to a shared life; · the reputation and public aspects of the relationship (such as whether the relationship is publicly acknowledged). 2.14 The above indicators do not form an exclusive list, nor are any of them a requirement for a close personal relationship to exist. 2.15 It is not intended that people who share accommodation for convenience (for example flatmates), or people who provide care as part of an employment relationship or on behalf of a charity should fall within the definition of close personal relationship. In the explanatory statement to the Income Tax Amendment Regulations 2005 (No. 7) which inserted former regulation 8A of the ITR 1936, it stated that: Generally speaking, it is not expected that children will be in an interdependency relationship with their parents. A close personal relationship as specified in subsection 302-200(1) of the ITAA 1997 would not normally exist between parents and their children because there would not be a mutual commitment to a shared life between the two. In addition, the relationship between parents and their adult children would be expected to change significantly over time. It would be expected that the adult child would eventually move out and secure independence from their parents. However, in this particular case, you are a parent of the deceased who is your adult child. The facts show that the deceased resided with both parents in the family home up until the time of the deceased's death. Prior to the deceased's death the deceased had a number of medical conditions. As such, your care for the deceased increased as the deceased was unable to look after their self and you had the responsibility of maintaining the deceased's personal hygiene such as showering and toiletry needs and provided the deceased with physical and personal support and comfort. You and your spouse purchased a commuter van with a wheelchair lift to be able to transport the deceased to doctor's visits and hospital appointments. It is also evident from the facts that the constant care provided by you to the deceased, is significant emotional support and care of a type and quality normally provided in a close personal relationship. Therefore clearly a relationship over and above the usual familial relationship existed between you and the deceased, prior to, and at the time of the deceased's death. The deceased was highly dependent on you emotionally and that care was provided on a continuing permanent basis. It is reasonable to assume that given the circumstances of the relationship would not have changed significantly over time. The facts show that there was a mutual commitment to a shared life between you and the deceased prior to and at the time of the deceased's death in 2009. Therefore, it is accepted that a close personal relationship existed between you and the deceased as envisaged by paragraph 302-200 (1)(a) of the ITAA 1997. | Detailed Reasoning - Cohabitation:: The second requirement to be met is specified in paragraph 302-200(1)(b) of the ITAA 1997, and states that two persons live together. The facts show that the deceased was residing with you in the family home up to and at the time of the deceased's death. Therefore the requirement specified in paragraph 302-200(1)(b) has been satisfied in this instance. | Detailed Reasoning - Financial support:: The third requirement to be met is specified in paragraph 302-200(1)(c) of the ITAA 1997, and states that one or each of these two persons provides the other with financial support. Unlike the situation prior to 1 July 2004 where financial dependency (substantial support) needs to be satisfied, financial support under paragraph 302-200(1)(c) is satisfied if some level (not necessarily substantial) of financial support is being provided by one person (or each of them) to the other. It is clear from the facts presented that you provided the deceased with financial support. You looked after the deceased who was financially dependant upon you not withstanding that the deceased was receiving disability support pension payments. In this instance, both the existence and the level of financial assistance provided by you to the deceased is established and it is not necessary to look at the level of financial support provided, but merely to establish that such support existed. Consequently, it is considered that paragraph 302-200(1)(c) of the ITAA 1997 has been satisfied in this instance. | Detailed Reasoning - Domestic support and personal care:: The fourth requirement to be met is specified in paragraph 302-200(1)(d) of the ITAA 1997, and states that one or each of these two persons provides the other with domestic support and personal care. In discussing the meaning of domestic support and personal care, paragraph 2.16 of the SEM states: Domestic support and personal care will commonly be of a frequent and ongoing nature. For example, domestic support services will consist of attending to the household shopping, cleaning, laundry and like services. Personal care services may commonly consist of assistance with mobility, personal hygiene and generally ensuring the physical and emotional comfort of a person. The facts show that you provided personal care which included activities such as making sure the deceased was bathed, dressed, helped with hygiene and mobility and making sure the deceased was as comfortable as possible. You cooked special meals for the deceased as the deceased was unable to eat many things. You and your spouse both cared for the deceased around the clock and read to the deceased and did breathing exercises with the deceased when the pain medication was not effective. Consistent both with the ordinary meaning of the words 'domestic support and personal care' in the context of paragraph 302-200(1)(d) of the ITAA 1997, and with the meaning of these words as discussed in paragraph 2.16 of the SEM, it is considered that you provided the deceased with significant personal care services at this time. On the facts provided, it is considered that the requirement in paragraph 302-200(1)(d) of the ITAA 1997 has been satisfied in this instance. | Detailed Reasoning - Application of subsection 302-200(2):: Essentially, this subsection ensures that where two people have a close personal relationship, however, because of the physical, intellectual or psychiatric disability of one of both of them, they do not satisfy one or more of the requirements in paragraphs 302-200(1)(b) to (d) of the ITAA 1997, they will still be considered to have an interdependent relationship. However, since all the requirements of subsection 302-200(1) of the ITAA 1997 have been met, consideration of subsection 302-200(2) is not necessary in this instance. | Detailed Reasoning - The deceased is in an interdependency relationship with the taxpayer:: From the facts presented, it is clear that all of the requirements which are set out in subsection 302-200(1) of the ITAA 1997 have been satisfied in this case. Consequently it is considered that you and the deceased did have an interdependency relationship. Therefore you are considered to be a dependant of the deceased within the definition of death benefits dependant in section 302-195 of the ITAA 1997. | Detailed Reasoning - The taxation treatment of a superannuation death benefit: As you are considered to be a death benefits dependant the superannuation death benefit will be tax-free and is not included in your assessable income.

Please check this edited version to be sure that there are no details remaining that you think may allow you to be identified. Contact us at the address given in the fact sheet if you have any concerns. | Subject: Superannuation death benefits - Interdependency relationship | The deceased lived with both parents in the family home until the deceased's death, in 2009. | In 20xx, the deceased became very ill with specific medical conditions. | The deceased was emotionally, physically and financially dependent on both parents, due to these medical conditions. | A Centrelink 2009 PAYG Payment Summary - Individual Non Business for the deceased shows a tax exempt amount for the 2008-09 income year. | The deceased was receiving a disability support pension from Centrelink up until the time of the deceased's death however, this pension did not cover all the necessary expenses for the deceased. | You and your spouse assisted the deceased with the cost of medications, dressing kits, bandages and bought a commode chair for the deceased's showering and toiletry needs. | You and your spouse extended your home loan to renovate the family home to accommodate the deceased's special needs. The renovations included a bathroom renovation and the installation of a stair lift. You both purchased a hospital bed, a special mattress and a hospital table tray to make life a little easier for the deceased. | You and your spouse helped with the costs of blood tests for the deceased as some were not covered by Medicare. | You and your spouse provided personal care which included activities such as making sure the deceased was bathed, dressed, helped with hygiene and mobility and making sure the deceased was as comfortable as possible. | Household bills such as electricity, phone, council rates and abnormally high water rates were covered by both parents' income. The car registration and insurance was paid by both parents. | You and your spouse cared for the deceased around the clock and read to the deceased and did breathing exercises with the deceased when the pain medication was not effective. | You were receiving a disability support pension prior to and at the time of the deceased's death and have provided a Centrelink 2009 PAYG Payment Summary - Individual Non Business which shows you received a tax exempt amount for the 2008-09 income year. | As beneficiary you are entitled to receive 50% of the superannuation death benefits from superannuation fund.