Private ruling: Commissioner's discretion
Published: December 2011
Ruling period: Year ended 30 June 2009 | Year ended 30 June 2010
Date scheme commenced: 1 July 2008

Ruling: Q1: Will the Commissioner exercise the discretion in paragraph 35-55(1)(b) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997) to allow you to include any losses from your primary production business activity in your calculation of taxable income for the 2008-09 and 2009-10 financial years? | A1: 


Relevant legislative provisions: Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 - Division 35 | Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 - Subsection 35-10(4) | Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 - Subsection 35-30 | Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 - Subsection 35-35 | Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 - Subsection 35-40 | Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 - Subsection 35-45 | Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 - Paragraph 35-55(1)(b)

Reasons for decision: Summary: Under Division 35 of the ITAA 1997, a loss made by an individual from a business activity will not be deductible in the financial year in which it arises unless certain conditions are met. Losses that cannot be taken into account in a particular year of income, because of subsection 35-10(2) of the ITAA 1997, can be applied to the extent of future profits from the business activity, or are deferred until one of the tests is passed, the discretion is exercised, or the exception applies. Under the rule in subsection 35-10(2) of the ITAA 1997 a loss made by an individual from a business activity will not be taken into account unless: · the exception in subsection 35-10(4) of the ITAA 1997 applies; or · you satisfy the income requirement under subsection 35-10(2E) of the ITAA 1997 and one of the four tests is met; or · if you do not satisfy the income requirement or if one of the tests is not met, the Commissioner exercises the discretion in section 35-55 of the ITAA 1997. Your assessable income from sources not related to this activity was more than $40,000 in the 2008-09 and 2009-10 financial years. Therefore, the exception contained in subsection 35-10(4) of the ITAA 1997 does not apply. Your income for non-commercial loss purposes is less than $250,000, therefore you satisfy the income requirement under subsection 35-10(2E) of the ITAA 1997. However, your business activity has not satisfied any of the four non-commercial loss tests contained in sections 35-30 (assessable income test), 35-35 (profits test), 35-40 (real property test) and 35-45 (other assets test) of the ITAA 1997. The Commissioner's discretion - lead time Under paragraph 35-55(1)(b) of the ITAA 1997, the Commissioner's discretion can be exercised where: · the business activity has started to be carried on but because of its nature it has not satisfied, or will not satisfy, one of the tests set out in sections 35-30, 35-35, 35-40 or 35-45 of the ITAA 1997; and · there is an objective expectation that within a period that is commercially viable for the industry concerned the activity will meet one of the tests listed above or produce assessable income for an income year greater than the deductions attributable to it for that year. Taxation Ruling TR 2007/6 sets out guidelines on how the Commissioner's discretion under paragraph 35-55(1)(b) of the ITAA 1997 may be exercised. The following has been extracted from paragraphs 70 to 104 of this Ruling. The discretion is provided to ensure that certain individuals who carry on genuine commercial businesses are not disadvantaged due to particular circumstances which prevent them from satisfying one of the tests. This arm of the safeguard discretion will ensure that the loss deferral rule in section 35-10 of the ITAA 1997 does not adversely impact on taxpayers who have commenced to carry on activities which by their nature require a number of years to produce assessable income. The paragraph is intended to cover a business activity that has a lead time between the commencement of the activity and the production of any assessable income. Such activities have an inherent characteristic that cannot be overcome by conducting the business activity in a different way but only by changing the nature of the business. In your case, the Commissioner has already considered the 'nature' of this business activity in a Product Ruling and exercised the discretion to the 2001-02 financial year. The business activity, by its nature, required a number of years to produce assessable income and, as you have shown, it has been producing assessable income since the 2001-02 financial year. The reason the business activity has not passed one of the tests is due to the small interest you hold. The activity has failed to produce a tax profit to date due to normal market fluctuations and not because of anything inherent to the nature of the business activity. Therefore, the Commissioner is unable to exercise the discretion available in paragraph 35-55(1)(b) of the ITAA 1997 in relation to your primary production business activities for 2008-09 and 2009-10 financial years.

Please check this edited version to be sure that there are no details remaining that you think may allow you to be identified. If you have any concerns about this ruling you wish to discuss, you will find our contact details in the fact sheet. | Relevant facts: You commenced your primary production business activity in 2000. | The business activity is detailed in a Product Ruling, in which the Commissioner exercised the discretion in paragraph 35-55(1)(b) of the ITAA 1997 to the 2001-02 financial year. | You have provided some income and expenditure figures that show that income has been received in relation to this activity since the 2001-02 financial year. | Income received between the 2001-02 and 2005-06 financial years has not exceeded $2,000 per year. | This business activity has not satisfied any of the four non-commercial loss tests nor made a profit since it commenced. | Your income for non-commercial loss purposes was more than $40,000 but less than $250,000 in the 2008-09 and 2009-10 financial years.