Private ruling: Home to work travel
Published: February 2015
Ruling period: Year ended 30 June 2014
Date scheme commenced: 1 July 2013

Ruling: Q1: Are you entitled to a deduction for the cost of your airfares to and from work? | A1: No

Relevant facts and circumstances: You normally travelled to your worksite by driving. You have stated that you are entitled to claim a deduction for this travel as you carry tools and equipment. Due to some weather events, inaccessible roads and fatigue occurrences you were forced to purchase several flights. You carried the same tools and equipment on these flights.

Relevant legislative provisions: Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 section 8-1

Reasons for decision: Summary: Section 8-1 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 allows a deduction for all losses and outgoings to the extent to which they are incurred in gaining or producing assessable income except where the outgoings are of a capital, private or domestic nature. In considering the deductibility of travel expenses a distinction is made between travel to work and travel on work. It is only if the duties of the job require a taxpayer to travel in the course of undertaking their work duties that the taxpayer's expenses can be deducted ( Taylor v Provan 1975 AC 194). A deduction is generally not allowable for the cost of travel by an employee between home and their normal workplace as it is considered to be a private expense. The cost of travel between home and work is generally incurred to put the employee in a position to perform duties of employment, rather than in the performance of those duties. (see paragraph 77 of Taxation Ruling TR 95/34) However, there are situations where it has been accepted that travel by employees from home to work is deductible. These situations include: • where the employment can be construed as having commenced at the time of leaving home, for example a doctor on call, • where you travel between home and shifting places of work, that is, an itinerant occupation, and • the transportation of bulky equipment in some circumstances. | Detailed Reasoning - Bulky equipment: The Administrative Appeals Tribunal in Crestani v. FC of T 98 ATC 2219; 40 ATR 1037( Crestani's case ) found the taxpayer's toolbox measuring 25cm x 28cm x 57cm and weighing 27kg was bulky and cumbersome. In this case, the taxpayer was an aircraft engineer who worked at Sydney Airport. They transported their toolbox home at the end of each shift as there was no secure storage at work. The Tribunal held that the home to work travel was attributed to the transportation of these tools. The expenses incurred in transporting these tools were deductible and the taxpayer was simply one of those fortunate few who is able to hitch a free ride on his tool box. In the case of bulky equipment, the cost is attributed to the transportation of the bulky equipment rather than private travel between home and work where the transportation of the equipment is essential and is not done as a matter of personal choice or convenience and there is no secure storage provided at the workplace. However, when travelling by plane, the cost of a plane flight is considered to be the expense enabling you to travel as a passenger. As a passenger, you are also entitled to carry a certain quantity of luggage with you. Your tools are hitching a ride with you and therefore you have not incurred any expenses in transporting the tools apart from the excess luggage fees. The travel is considered private in nature. Consequently no deduction is available for the cost of your plane tickets.