Private ruling: Self education
Published: August 2012
Ruling period: Year ended 30 June 2012
Date scheme commenced: 1 July 2011

Ruling: Q1: Are you entitled to a deduction for self education expenses? | A1: No.


Relevant legislative provisions: Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 8-1

Reasons for decision: Summary: Section 8-1 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997) allows a deduction for a loss or outgoing to the extent that it is incurred in gaining or producing assessable income. However, a loss or outgoing is not deductible if it is of a capital, private or domestic nature, or it is incurred in gaining or producing exempt income. The Commissioner's view on the deductibility of self education expenses are explained in Taxation Ruling TR 98/9. According to paragraph 13 and 14 self education expenses are allowed if: · a taxpayer's income earning activities are based on the exercise of a skill or some specific knowledge, and the self education course enables the taxpayer to maintain or improve that skill or knowledge; or, · the study of a subject of self education objectively leads to, or is likely to lead to, an increase in a taxpayer's income from their current income earning activity in the future. Therefore, provided there is a sufficient connection between your self education and current income earning activities, you are entitled to claim a deduction for your self education expenses. However according to paragraph 15 of TR 98/9, no deduction is allowed for your self education expenses if the study is to: · enable you to get employment · enable you to obtain new employment, or · open up a new income-earning activity (whether in business or in your current employment). This view is supported by the decision of the High Court in FC of T v. Maddalena 71 ATC 4161; (1971) 2 ATR 541 , which establishes the principle that no deduction is allowable for self education expenses if the study, viewed objectively, is designed to enable a taxpayer to get employment or obtain new employment. Such expenses are incurred at a point too soon to be regarded as incurred in gaining or producing assessable income. The above principles do not always operate on a mutually exclusive basis. It is always necessary to have regard to the words of section 8-1 of the ITAA 1997 and apply them to the facts (paragraph 16 of TR 98/9). Based on the Australian Standard Classification of Occupations (ASCO) descriptions, there is a significant difference between the position of Enrolled Nurse (EN) and RN, on the one hand, and PCA and Nursing Assistants (NA) on the other hand. In addition to the requirement of registration or licensing, the EN and RN have entrusted to them a range of activities that could not be undertaken by the PCA/NA. At its simplest level, the EN and the RN are nurses; the NA, or PCA, is not. A person does not need to have a degree in Nursing, or to be studying for such a degree, to be employed as a PCA or NA. Although, a PCA and a RN would primarily perform different duties, we do recognise that some duties may overlap on occasions. However, as discussed above, a RN would perform duties of a more specialised nature based on the additional education and training they have received. It is considered that your self education will open up a new field of employment, that of a registered nurse. Therefore, you are not entitled to a deduction for self education expenses.

Please check this edited version to be sure that there are no details remaining that you think may allow you to be identified. If you have any concerns about this ruling you wish to discuss, you will find our contact details in the fact sheet. | Relevant facts: You are employed as a personal care assistant (PCA). | You are undertaking a Nursing degree in order to become a registered nurse (RN). | You are not required to do any extra duties above the normal PCA duties.