Private ruling: Non-commercial losses - farm management deposits
Published: December 2011
Ruling period: Year ended 30 June 2011
Date scheme commenced: 1 July 2010

Ruling: Q1: Does the repayment of funds from a farm management deposit (FMD) cause you to fail the income requirement under subsection 35-10(2E) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997)? | A1: 


Relevant legislative provisions: Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 - Subsection 393-15(2) of Schedule 2G | Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 - Subsection 35-10(2E)

Reasons for decision: Summary: The assessable income that arises from the operation of section 393-15, Schedule 2G of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (repayment of FMD) is considered assessable income 'from' the business activity when: · applying the loss deferral rule in Division 35, in subsection 35-10(2) of the ITAA 1997; and/or · determining whether the assessable income test in section 35-30 of the ITAA 1997 has been satisfied. The income repaid from the FMD is considered to be income from the business activity and your income from unrelated sources is less than $250,000. Therefore, you satisfy the income requirement under subsection 35-10(2E) of the ITAA 1997.

Please check this edited version to be sure that there are no details remaining that you think may allow you to be identified. If you have any concerns about this ruling you wish to discuss, you will find our contact details in the fact sheet. | Relevant facts: You are a partner in a partnership which conducts a primary production business. | The partnership made a loss in the 2010-11 financial year. | Over a number of income years, you each deposited amounts into two FMDs. | All eligibility rules for FMDs have been satisfied. | In the 2010-11 financial year, you each withdrew $XXX,000 from a FMD. | The funds were used for running expenses for the primary production activities. | You do not have income from other sources.