Private ruling: CGT - small business concessions - replacement asset - extension of time
Published: August 2017
Ruling period: Year ended 30 June 2017 | Year ended 30 June 2018
Date scheme commenced: 1 July 2016

Ruling: Q1: Will the Commissioner exercise his discretion under subsection 104-190(2) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997) to extend the replacement asset period to XX February 20XX? | A1: Yes

Relevant facts and circumstances: In the 20XX-XX financial year you elected to use the small business rollover to defer capital gain that you made. The date of the capital gains tax (CGT) event was XX February 20XX. The contract for sale on your asset had a twelve month settlement period, which was further extended by the purchaser to XX May 20XX. During the two year period you have actively searched for a replacement asset. You have entered into purchase negotiations on a number of assets, one of which you are still currently in negotiation with. You attempted to obtain lending from your financial institution to purchase the new asset prior to settlement; however your application for finance was unsuccessful. You have requested an extension to the replacement period to XX February 20XX.

Relevant legislative provisions: Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 subsection 104-190(2)

Reasons for decision: Summary: In order to apply the small business rollover, a replacement asset must be acquired within two years after the relevant CGT event. However the Commissioner may extend the replacement asset period in certain circumstances (subsection 104-190(2) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997)). The relevant factors in determining whether to extend the replacement asset period are: There should be evidence of an acceptable explanation for the period of extension requested and that it would be fair and equitable in the circumstances to provide such an extension Account must be had to any prejudice to the Commissioner which may result from the additional time being allowed, however the mere absence of prejudice is not enough to justify the granting of an extension Account must be had of any unsettling of people, other than the Commissioner, or of established practices There must be a consideration of fairness to people in like positions and the wider public interest Whether there is any mischief involved A consideration of the consequences. You rolled over a capital gain under the small business rollover during the 20XX-XX financial year. You have been unable to acquire a suitable replacement asset within the replacement period. You have however, considered the purchase of a number of businesses. We consider that you have made ongoing efforts to acquire a replacement asset. Having considered the relevant factors above, and the particular circumstances of your case, the Commissioner has applied his discretion and will extend the asset replacement period to XX February 20XX.