Private ruling: Insurance payment
Published: August 2014
Ruling period: Year ended 30 June 2014 | Year ended 30 June 2015 | Year ended 30 June 2016 | Year ended 30 June 2017
Date scheme commenced: 1 July 2013

Ruling: Q1: Are the monthly payments received under your insurance policy assessable income? | A1: Yes.

Relevant facts and circumstances: You were injured in a work related accident. You sustained many lasting injuries which resulted in your permanent disablement. Your insurance policy was for wage and income protection. You receive monthly income replacement payments from your insurer.

Relevant legislative provisions: Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Subsection 6-5(2)

Reasons for decision: Summary: Subsection 6-5(2) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997) provides that the assessable income of an Australian resident includes income according to ordinary concepts (ordinary income) derived directly or indirectly from all sources, whether in or out of Australia, during the income year. Based on case law, it can be said that ordinary income generally includes receipts that: • are earned • are expected • are relied upon, and • have an element of periodicity, recurrence or regularity. Payments of salary or wages, including payments made under an insurance policy that replaces salary or wages are income according to ordinary concepts and are included in assessable income under section 6-5 of the ITAA 1997. The question of whether amounts paid under an insurance policy in lieu of income are assessable was considered by the High Court in F C of T v Smith, 81 ATC 4114 ( Smith's case) . In that case, the taxpayer was a medical practitioner employed by a hospital. He was injured in a traffic accident on 19 October 1977 and was disabled until 16 February 1978. For that period he received $2,112 under the terms of a personal disability insurance policy which he had taken out some years earlier. It was held by the Full High Court that the amount of $2,112 was assessable. In their joint judgement Gibbs, Stephen, Mason and Wilson JJ said that, in their opinion, the conclusion was inescapable that the purpose of the policy was to diminish the adverse economic consequences of injury by accident. It was to provide a monthly indemnity against the income loss arising from the inability to earn. The revenue nature of the benefits was clearly stamped upon them during the period of four months during which the insured was totally disabled from earning. The decision in Smith's case confirms the Commissioner's practice of including periodic benefits payable under a disability insurance policy as assessable income. It is considered that had an income protection insurance policy been the relevant policy in Smith's case the decision would have been the same. In your case, you receive monthly income replacement payments as a result of your wage and income protection insurance. The purpose of this policy was to provide you with income in the event of you being unable to work. The amount paid under the policy was earned because of your rights under the policy. It was also expected, relied upon and had an element of periodicity, recurrence or regularity. Therefore, your payments have the characteristics of ordinary income identified above and the payments are assessable under subsection 6-5(2) of the ITAA 1997.