Private ruling: Death Benefit - Interdependency
Published: August 2017
Ruling period: Income year ending 30 June 2017
Date scheme commenced: April 2016

Ruling: Q1: Is the Beneficiary a death benefits dependant of the Deceased in accordance with section 302-195 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997) by virtue of being in an interdependency relationship with the Deceased under section 302-200 of the ITAA 1997 just before they died? | A1: Yes


Relevant legislative provisions: Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 302-195. | Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 302-200. | Income Tax Assessment Regulations 1997 Regulation 302-200.01

Reasons for decision: Summary: An interdependency relationship as defined under section 302-200 of the ITAA 1997 existed between the Deceased and the Beneficiary just before the Deceased died. Therefore, the Beneficiary is a death benefits dependant of the Deceased as defined in section 302-195 of the ITAA 1997. | Detailed Reasoning - Detailed reasoning: Subsection 302-195(1) of the ITAA 1997 defines a death benefits dependant of a person who has died as: The deceased person's *spouse or former spouse; or The deceased person's *child, aged less than 18; or Any other person with whom the deceased person had an interdependency relationship under section 302-200 just before he or she died; or Any other person who was a dependant of the deceased just before he or she died. As the Beneficiary is a child of the Deceased aged over 18, paragraphs 302-195(1)(a) and (b) of the ITAA 1997 do not apply. Therefore, to conclude that the Beneficiary is a death benefits dependant of the Deceased, it must be established that the Beneficiary had an 'interdependency relationship' with the Deceased or that they were a 'dependant' of the Deceased just before the Deceased died. | Detailed Reasoning - What is an interdependency relationship?: Subsection 302-200(1) of the ITAA 1997 states that two persons (whether or not related by family) have an interdependency relationship if: They have a close personal relationship; and They live together; and One or each of them provides the other with financial support; and One or each of them provides the other with domestic support and personal care. Subsection 302-200(3) of the ITAA 1997 provides that matters and circumstances that are, or are not, to be taken into account in determining whether two persons have an interdependency relationship under that section may be specified in the regulations. To that effect, regulation 302-200.01 of the Income Tax Assessment Regulation 1997 (ITAR 1997) states that in considering paragraph 302-200(3)(a) of the ITAA 1997, matters to be taken into account are all relevant circumstances of the relationship between the persons, including (in this case): The duration of the relationship; and The degree of mutual commitment to a shared life; and The degree of emotional support; and The extent to which the relationship is one of mere convenience; and Any evidence suggesting that the parties intend the relationship to be permanent. | Detailed Reasoning - Close personal relationship: Generally, a close personal relationship as specified in subsection 302-200(1) of the ITAA 1997 would not exist between a parent and child. This is because the relationship between a parent and child would be expected to change significantly over time and there would be no mutual commitment to a shared life between the two. However, where, as in this case, unusual and exceptional circumstances exist, a relationship between a parent and child may be treated as an interdependency relationship for the purposes of subsection 302-200(1) of the ITAA 1997. In this case, it is considered that the relationship between the Beneficiary and the Deceased was over and above that of a normal family relationship and that a close personal relationship existed as required by paragraph 302-200(1)(a) of the ITAA 1997. The matters that indicate that the Beneficiary and the Deceased had a close personal relationship are: The Beneficiary provided care to the Deceased from 2003 to 2016; The Beneficiary and the Deceased lived together until the Deceased's passing; While the parties lived together, they provided each other with ongoing financial, domestic and emotional support; The Beneficiary's ongoing commitment to provide extensive emotional and domestic support and personal care to the Deceased; and There is nothing to indicate that the relationship was one of mere convenience. | Detailed Reasoning - Living together: From 2003 to the time of their death, the Deceased and Beneficiary lived together Accordingly, paragraph 302-200(1)(b) of the ITAA 1997 is satisfied as the Deceased and the Beneficiary were living together at the time of the Deceased's death. | Detailed Reasoning - Financial support: Financial support under paragraph 302-200(1)(c) of the ITAA 1997 is satisfied if some level (not necessarily substantial) of financial support is being provided by one person (or each of them) to the other. In this case, the Deceased provided financial support to the Beneficiary to meet their day-to-day living expenses, including food and accommodation. Therefore, it is considered that the Deceased provided the Beneficiary with financial support as required under paragraph 302-200(1)(c) of the ITAA 1997. | Detailed Reasoning - Domestic support and personal care: Domestic support and personal care will be of a frequent and ongoing nature. For example, domestic support services will consist of attention to the household shopping, cleaning, laundry and like services. Personal care services may commonly consist of assistance with mobility, personal hygiene and generally ensuring the physical and emotional comfort of a person. In this case, the Beneficiary provided domestic support and personal care to the Deceased on an ongoing basis. This consisted of the Beneficiary undertaking routine domestic tasks for the Deceased and providing the Deceased with personal care including mobility as the Deceased was paralysed down the left side of his body and unable to move himself. Based on the above, the Beneficiary meets all the requirements of an interdependency relationship for the purposes of section 300-200 of the ITAA 1997. Therefore the Beneficiary is a death benefit dependant of the Deceased for the purposes of section 302-195 of the ITAA 1997.

Relevant facts and circumstances | The Deceased died in April 2016. | The Beneficiary is the mother of the Deceased aged more than 18 years. | The Deceased was ill and unable to work. The Deceased received monthly disability payments under a sickness and accident insurance policy. The ongoing and progressive effects illness restricted the Deceased's ability to perform everyday physical tasks and, as their health declined, they required care and support. | The Beneficiary cared for and lived with the Deceased from 2003, until his death in 2016. | The Deceased lived with the Beneficiary for almost all his life (except for a 3 year period in the 1990s when the Deceased lived Interstate). | During the period from 2003-2016, the Beneficiary provided the Deceased with ongoing financial and domestic support and personal care, including the following: | Domestic support including meals, washing and cleaning the Deceased; | Actively caring for the Deceased, including admitting the Deceased for weekly treatment; and | Management of the Deceased financial affairs; including paying his bills, and initiating annual taxation payment arrangements for the Deceased tax affairs | The Deceased provided the Beneficiary with ongoing financial support and personal care, including the following: | Contributing to living expenses such as household bills and groceries; | Weekly payments towards the mortgage held on the house owned by the Beneficiary; and | Providing the Beneficiary with ongoing emotional support.