Private ruling: Non-commercial losses - Commissioner's discretion
Published: August 2012
Ruling period: Year ended 30 June 2012
Date scheme commenced: 1 July 2011

Ruling: Q1: Will the Commissioner exercise the discretion in paragraph 35-55(1)(a) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997) to allow you to include any losses from your business activity in your calculation of taxable income for the financial year ended 30 June 2012? | A1: No.

Relevant facts and circumstances: You operate a business. Your annual taxable income does not normally exceed $250,000. You received a payment on termination of employment which resulted in your income for non-commercial purposes to exceed $250,000 in the 2011-12 financial year.

Relevant legislative provisions: Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 subsection 35-10(1) | Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 subsection 35-10(2) | Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 paragraph 35-55(1)(a) | Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 subsection 35-10(2E)

Reasons for decision: Summary: You have not satisfied the income requirement as your relevant income has exceeded $250,000. Therefore the loss from your activity will not be taken into account in the financial year ended 30 June 2012 unless the Commissioner will exercise his discretion in section 35-55 of the ITAA 1997. To apply the discretion in paragraph 35-55(1)(a) of the ITAA 1997, the Commissioner should be satisfied that the business activity is affected in the relevant year by special circumstances. Your annual taxable income does not normally exceed $250,000. In the financial year ended 30 June 2012 you received income on termination of employment which increased your income above $250,000. An increase in income is not considered a special circumstance that affects your business activity. There is nothing in the legislation that allows an exemption from the income requirement because of a one-off payment. There are no other discretions, exemptions or exclusions that apply to your situation in relation to the one off payment preventing you meeting the income requirement.

Please check this edited version to be sure that there are no details remaining that you think may allow you to be identified. If you have any concerns about this ruling you wish to discuss, you will find our contact details in the fact sheet.