Private ruling: Commissioner's discretion - special circumstances
Published: May 2013
Ruling period: Year ended 30 June 2011 | Year ended 30 June 2012
Date scheme commenced: 1 July 2010

Ruling: Q1: Will the Commissioner exercise the discretion in paragraph 35-55(1)(a) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997) to allow you to include any losses from your primary production business in your calculation of taxable income for the 2010-11 and 2011-12 financial years? | A1: 


Relevant legislative provisions: Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 - Division 35 | Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 - Subsection 35-10(4) | Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 - Paragraph 35-55(1)(a)

Reasons for decision: Summary: Under Division 35 of the ITAA 1997, a loss made by an individual from a business activity will not be deductible in the financial year in which it arises unless certain conditions are met. Losses that cannot be taken into account in a particular year of income, because of subsection 35-10(2) of the ITAA 1997, can be applied to the extent of future profits from the business activity, or are deferred until one of the tests is passed, the discretion is exercised, or the exception applies. Under the rule in subsection 35-10(2) of the ITAA 1997 a loss made by an individual from a business activity will not be taken into account unless: · the exception in subsection 35-10(4) of the ITAA 1997 applies; or · you satisfy the income requirement under subsection 35-10(2E) of the ITAA 1997 and one of the four tests is met; or · if you do not satisfy the income requirement or if one of the tests is not met, the Commissioner exercises the discretion in section 35-55 of the ITAA 1997. Your assessable income from sources not related to this activity has been more than $40,000 for the 2010-11 and 2011-12 financial years. Therefore, the exception contained in subsection 35-10(2) of the ITAA 1997 does not apply. Your income for non-commercial loss purposes is less than $250,000, therefore you satisfy the income requirement under subsection 35-10(2E) of the ITAA 1997. However, your business activity has not satisfied any of the four non-commercial loss tests contained in sections 35-30 (assessable income test), 35-35 (profits test), 35-40 (real property test) and 35-45 (other assets test) of the ITAA 1997. The Commissioner's discretion - special circumstances Where the income requirement is satisfied, the Commissioner's discretion, under paragraph 35-55(1)(a) of the ITAA 1997, can be exercised where a business activity is affected by special circumstances, outside the control of the operators, such that it is unable to satisfy any of the tests. Taxation Ruling TR 2007/6 sets out the exercise of the Commissioner's discretion under paragraph 35-55(1)(a) of the ITAA 1997. The following has been extracted from paragraphs 47 to 53 of this Ruling. Special circumstances are ordinarily those affecting the business activity such that it is unable to satisfy a test and it would be unreasonable for the loss deferral rule to apply. Ordinary economic, weather or market fluctuations that might reasonably be predicted to affect the business activity would not be considered to be special circumstances. These fluctuations are expected to occur on a regular or recurrent basis and affect all business within a particular industry. Although not limited to natural disasters, paragraph 35-55(1)(a) of the ITAA 1997 refers to special circumstances outside the control of the business activity, including drought, flood, bushfire or some other natural disaster. Cyclones, hailstorms and tsunamis are examples of other natural disasters that would come within the scope of the paragraph. These events are taken to be special circumstances outside the control of the operators of the business activity. The special circumstances must have affected the business activity. In your case, the region where your farm is situated experienced drought conditions in the 2010-11 and 2011-12 financial years. It is accept that these conditions were outside your control and are 'special circumstances' for the purposes of paragraph 35-55(1)(a) of the ITAA 1997. However, before the Commissioner can exercise the discretion you must be able to show that it was the special circumstances that prevented your activities from meeting one of the tests. You commenced your activities part way through the 20XX-YY financial year. You had intended to produce several crops each year. However, due to drought conditions, you have only able been produce one. A normal season should generate $20,000 in income. Your livestock were purchased in the 20XX-YY financial year but none could be sold until the next financial year due to the dry conditions. Your livestock income in the current financial year is over $XX,000. Based on the information provided, the Commissioner is satisfied that your activities would have met one of the four tests had it not been affected by special circumstances. Therefore, the Commissioner will exercise the discretion available in accordance with subsection 35-55(1) and paragraph 35-55(1)(a) of the ITAA 1997 in relation to your activities for the 2010-11 and 2011-12 financial years.

Relevant facts: You commenced your farming activities during the 20XX-YY financial year under a partnership structure. | The mixed farming activity is conducted on a partly irrigated property. | You had intended to produce several crops each year. However, due to drought conditions, you were only able to complete one. | A normal season should generate in excess of $20,000 in income. | Livestock was purchased in the next financial year but none could be sold until the following financial year due to the dry conditions. | Your livestock income in the current financial year is over $20,000. | Your income for non-commercial loss purposes in the 20XX-YY and 20YY-ZZ financial years was above $XX,000 but below $YYY,000.