Private ruling: Losses - continuity of ownership
Published: June 2012
Ruling period: Year ended 30 June 2010 | Year ended 30 June 2011 | Year ended 30 June 2012 | Year ended 30 June 2013

Ruling: Q1: Will company A satisfy the conditions of section 165-12 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997), as modified by Division 166 of the ITAA 1997, for each tax loss made in the years ended 30 June 2010, 30 June 2011 and 30 June 2012 during test periods that end on 30 June 2013? | A1: Yes

Relevant facts and circumstances: This ruling is based on the facts stated in the description of the scheme that is set out below. If your circumstances are materially different from these facts, this ruling has no effect and you cannot rely on it. The fact sheet has more information about relying on your private ruling. Company A is the head entity of company A Tax Consolidated Group (ATC). The shares in company A are held by four widely held companies (B, C, D and E). For the income years ended 30 June 2010 and 2011 and 2012 ATC incurred tax losses. ATC forecasts that it will recoup all its tax losses beginning in the year ended 30 June 2013, and ending by the year ended 30 June 2018. During the year ended 30 June 2011, company A issued additional equity to its existing shareholders. There has been no CGT event in relation to any direct and indirect equity interests in company A. The shareholders of company A will not dispose of any of their beneficial interest in company A on or before 30 June 2013. Following two equity tranches issued in 2011 year, there will be no other changes to the share capital of company A between that date and 30 June 2012. The current net asset value of company A is higher relative to the issue prices of its shares. Company A is the eligible Division 166 company as defined in subsection 995-1(1) of the ITAA 1997. From X 2012 to 30 June 2013, no CGT event will happen in relation to any direct equity interests or indirect equity interests held in company A by the stakeholders. From X 2012 to 30 June 2013, there will be no changes to the existing voting power, rights to dividends and rights to capital distributions of shareholders. Company A will not issue any additional equity during the period 30 June 2012 to 30 June 2013.

Relevant legislative provisions: Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 section 166-5 | Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 section 165-12 | Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 section 166-145 | Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 section 166-175 | Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 section 166-240 | Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 section 166-272 | Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 subsection 995-1(1)

Reasons for decision: Summary: Section 165-12 of the ITAA 1997 specifies conditions that a company must satisfy in order to deduct a tax loss. Broadly, section 165-12 provides that the company must maintain more than 50% continuity of ownership throughout the ownership test period. The ownership test period is the period from the start of the loss year to the end of the income year in which the company seeks to deduct the tax loss. Division 166 of the ITAA 1997 modifies the way the rules in Division 165 of the ITAA 1997 apply to a widely held company or an eligible Division 166 company. However, the company may choose that Subdivision 165-A of the ITAA 1997 is to apply to it for the income year without the modifications made by Subdivision 166-A of the ITAA 1997 (subsection 166-15(1) of the ITAA 1997). As company A is the eligible Division 166 company, Division 166 of the ITAA 1197 will apply to company A. Section 166-5 of the ITAA 1997 provides that the eligible Division 166 company is taken to have met the conditions in section 165-12 of the ITAA 1997 if there is substantial continuity of ownership of the company as between the start of the test period and: · the end of each income year in that period; and · the end of each corporate change in that period. The substantial continuity of ownership is defined in section 166-145 of the ITAA 1997. If there is substantial continuity of ownership under section 166-145, the effect of subsection 166-5(3) of the ITAA 1997 is that company A will be taken to have satisfied section 165-12 of the ITAA 1997. Pursuant to subsection 166-5(2) of the ITAA 1997, the company's test period is the period consisting of the loss year, the income year and any intervening period. | Detailed Reasoning - Substantial continuity of ownership: During the test period, company A issued two tranches of shares. This resulted in a corporate change as defined in paragraph 166-175(1)(d) of the ITAA 1997 because each was an issue of shares in the company that resulted in an increase of 20% or more in the number of company's A shares on issue. Under section 166-145 of the ITAA 1997, there is substantial continuity of ownership of a company as between the start of the test period and another time in the test period if, at the start of the test period and immediately after the other time in the test period: · the same persons (none of them companies or trustees) had more than 50% of the voting power in the company; · the same persons (none of them companies) had rights to more than 50% of the company's dividends; and · the same persons (none of them companies) had rights to more than 50% of the company's capital distributions. Section 166-240 of the ITAA 1997 modifies how the ownership tests in section 166-145 are applied to the tested company if a widely held company directly or indirectly, or both directly and indirectly holds any of the following: · voting stake that carries rights to between 10% and 50% (inclusive) of the voting power in the company; · a dividend stake that carries the right to receive between 10% and 50% (inclusive) of any dividends that the company may pay; · a capital stake that carries the right to receive between 10% and 50% (inclusive) of any distribution of capital of the company. Broadly, the effect of section 166-240 of the ITAA 1997 is that a widely held company is treated as the ultimate owner of a direct or indirect stake in a tested company, if the stake is between 10 per cent and 50 per cent (inclusive). For the purposes of subsection 166-240(3) of the ITAA 1997, each of B, C, D and E are widely held companies for each income year in which each ownership test time occurs (from 1 July 2009 to 30 June 2013). In this case, the voting, dividend and capital stake in company A is between 10% and 50%, and therefore section 166-240 of the ITAA 1997 modifies how the ownership tests in section 166-145 of the ITAA 1997 are applied to company A. This is discussed below. | Detailed Reasoning - Same share same interest rule: Section 166-272 of the ITAA 1997 modifies how the ownership tests in section 166-145 of the ITAA 1997 are applied to a voting stake, a dividend stake or a capital stake in company A held by a stakeholder, being (under paragraph 166-272(1)(b) of the ITAA 1997) a widely held company referred to in section 166-240 of the ITAA 1997 (whether directly, or indirectly through one or more interposed entities). Subsection 166-272(2) of the ITAA 1997 provides: For the purpose of determining whether the tested company has satisfied a condition or whether a time is a changeover time or an alteration time in respect of the tested company: · a condition that has to be satisfied is not satisfied; or · a time that, apart from this subsection, would not be a changeover time or alteration time is taken to be a changeover time or alteration time, as the case may be; · unless, at all relevant times: · the only *shares in the tested company that are taken into account are exactly the same shares and are held by the same persons; and · the only interests (including shares) in any other entity that is interposed between the stakeholder and the tested company that are taken into account are exactly the same interests and are held by the same persons. Broadly, the effect of subsection 160-272(2) of the ITAA 1997 is that a company can only take account of interests held by persons if they are the same interests and are held by the same persons throughout the test period. Accordingly, for the purpose of application of section 166-145 of the ITAA 1997, the only shares in company A that are taken into account are the shares in existence on 1 July 2009, in the numbers in which they were held directly and indirectly by B, C, D and E on that date. 2010 year tax loss Based on the facts as provided, as a result of the same share same interest rule in subsection 166-272(2) of the ITAA 1997, the dividend rights condition in subsection 166-145(3) of the ITAA 1997 and the capital distribution rights condition in subsection 166-145(4) of the ITAA 1997 are not satisfied in the test period from 1 July 2009 to 30 June 2013. However, if that provision were disregarded, all of the shares in existence in company A at an ownership test time would be taken into account at that time. | Detailed Reasoning - Saving rule: Subsection 166-272(8) of the ITAA 1997 provides that if any of the conditions in section 166-145 of the ITAA 1997 have not been satisfied (in this case, the dividend rights condition in subsection 166-145(3) of the ITAA 1997 and the capital distributions rights condition in subsection 166-145(4) of the ITAA 1997), those conditions are taken to have been satisfied if: · they would have been satisfied except for the operation of subsection 166-272(2); and · the tested company has information from which it would be reasonable to conclude that less than 50% of: · the tax loss; or · the notional loss; or · the bad debt; or · the unrealised net loss (within the meaning of section 165-115E); · as the case requires, has been reflected in deductions, capital losses, or reduced assessable income, that occurred, or could occur in future, because of the happening of any CGT event in relation to any direct equity interests or indirect equity interests held in the tested company by the stakeholder, or an entity interposed between the stakeholder and the tested company, during the test period. As discussed above, the dividend rights condition in subsection 166-145(3) of the ITAA 1997 and the capital distribution rights condition in subsection 166-145(4) of the ITAA 1997 would have been satisfied for the test period from 1 July 2009 to 30 June 2013 except for the operation of subsection 166-272(2) of the ITAA 1997. Based on the information provided, subsection 166-278(8) of the ITAA 1997 is satisfied. Accordingly, the dividend rights condition in subsection 166-145(3) of the ITAA 1997 and the capital distribution rights condition in subsection 166-145(4) of the ITAA 1997 are taken to have been satisfied. 2011 year tax loss Based on the facts as provided by the applicant, as a result of the same share same interest rule in subsection 166-272(2) of the ITAA 1997, the dividend rights condition in subsection 166-145(3) of the ITAA 1997 and the capital distribution rights condition in subsection 166-145(4) of the ITAA 1997 are not satisfied in the test period from 1 July 2010 to 30 June 2013. However, if that provision were disregarded, all of the shares in existence in company A at an ownership test time would be taken into account at that time. Based on the information provided, subsection 166-278(8) of the ITAA 1997 is satisfied. Accordingly, the dividend rights condition in subsection 166-145(3) of the ITAA 1997 and the capital distribution rights condition in subsection 166-145(4) of the ITAA 1997 of the ITAA 1997 are taken to have been satisfied. 2012 year tax loss Based on the information provided the voting power condition in subsection 166-145(2) of the ITAA 1997, the dividend rights condition in subsection 166-145(3) of the ITAA 1997 and the capital distribution rights condition in subsection 166-145(4) of the ITAA 1997 is satisfied for the test period from 1 July 2011 to 30 June 2013. | Detailed Reasoning - Conclusion: Therefore, company A will satisfy the conditions in section 165-12 of the ITAA 1997, as modified by Division 166 of the ITAA 1997, for each tax loss made in the years ended 30 June 2010, 30 June 2011 and 30 June 2012 during test periods that end on 30 June 2013.

Please check this edited version to be sure that there are no details remaining that you think may allow you to be identified. If you have any concerns about this ruling you wish to discuss, you will find our contact details in the fact sheet.