Private ruling: Income Tax: Exemption, state or territory body
Published: December 2013
Ruling period: Year ended 30 June 2015 | Year ended 30 June 2016 | Year ended 30 June 2017
Date scheme commenced: On or after 1 July 2008

Ruling: Q1: 1.Is a state or territory body (STB) exempt from Commonwealth income tax under section 24AM of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (ITAA 1936)? | A2: Yes.


Relevant legislative provisions: Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 Section 24AM. | Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 Section 24AN. | Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 Section 24AO. | Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 Section 24AT. | Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 Section 24AY. | Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 Section 24AW. | Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 36-10. | Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 36-17. | Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Subsection 36-17(3) | Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Subsection 36-25 | Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Subdivision 165-E | Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 165-210.

Reasons for decision: Detailed Reasoning - State or territory body: Section 24AM of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (ITAA 1936) states that income of a State or Territory Body (STB) is exempt from income tax unless section 24AN applies to the STB. Section 24AN of the ITAA 1936 states income derived by an STB is not exempt from income tax under division 1AB of the ITAA 1936 if, at the time that income is derived, the STB is an excluded STB. Further, sections 24AO to 24AS of the ITAA 1936 provide five ways in which a body can be regarded an STB. In particular, section 24AO of the ITAA 1936 provides that a body is an STB if: (a) it is a company limited solely by shares; and (b) all the shares in it are beneficially owned by one or more government entities. Section 24AT of the ITAA 1936 defines the meaning of 'excluded STB', 'government entity' and 'territory', and provides that in this Division: excluded STB is an entity that: (a) at a particular time, is prescribed as an excluded STB in relation to that time; or (b) is a municipal corporation or other local governing body (within the meaning of section 50-25 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 ); or (c) is a public educational institution to which any of paragraphs 50-55(a) to (c) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 applies; or (d) is a public hospital to which any of paragraphs 50-55(a) to (c) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 ) applies; or (e) is a superannuation fund. government entity means: (a) a State; or (b) a Territory; or (c) another STB that is not an excluded STB. In your circumstances, the entity is a company limited solely by shares and all of those shares are beneficially owned by the State, which is a government entity within the meaning set out under section 24AT of the ITAA 1936. Further, the entity does not fall within the categories of excluded STB set out under section 24AT of the ITAA 1936, in that the entity is not: · at a particular time, prescribed as an excluded STB in relation to that time, or · a municipal corporation or other local governing body (within the meaning of section 50-25 of the ITAA 1997); or · a public educational institution to which any of paragraphs 50-55(a) to (c) of the ITAA 1997 applies, or · a public hospital to which any of paragraphs 50-55(a) to (c) of the ITAA 1997 applies, or · a superannuation fund. Therefore, it is considered that the entity is a state or territory body (STB) exempt from Commonwealth income tax under section 24AM of the ITAA 1936. | Detailed Reasoning - Prior year tax losses: Division 1AB of the ITAA 1936 operates to, among other things, exempt the income of wholly-owned state and territory bodies from income tax. Subdivision B of Division 1AB operates to ensure that any losses made by an STB in the period from 1 July 1995 until the body is sold to private interests, are extinguished when the body is privatised. There is no stated intention in explanatory material accompanying the introduction of the relevant legislation, nor any explicit provisions within Division 1AB, to affect the availability of tax losses made in income years prior to the income year in which a company commences to be an STB. Section 36-17 of the ITAA 1997 sets out the rules on how corporate tax entities may deduct tax losses from a loss year in a later income year. Subsection 36-17(2) of the ITAA 1997 applies if a company had no net exempt income in a later year and the company's total assessable income exceeds the entity's total deductions (a recoupment year), the entity may choose to offset any amount of the available loss. Subsection 36-17(3) of the ITAA 1997 applies if a company has net exempt income in a later year and the company's total assessable income exceeds the entity's total deductions (a recoupment year). This subsection requires that you first deduct the tax loss from your net exempt income. Subsection 36-17(4) of the ITAA 1997 deals with the situation where you have net exempt income, however your deductions in an income year exceed your total assessable income (a loss). Similarly to Subsection 31-17(3), you are required to offset the excess of the deductions against net exempt income. The entity may also choose to offset any amount of, or none of (nil), the available loss under subsections 36-17(2) and (3), however that choice is limited by circumstances set out under subsection 36-15(5), which provides: The choice that the entity has under subsection (2) or (3) for the later income year is subject to both of the following: (a) the entity must choose a nil amount if, disregarding the tax loss and other tax losses of the entity, the entity would have an amount of excess franking offsets for that year; (b) if, disregarding the tax loss and other tax losses of the entity, the entity would not have an amount of excess franking offsets for that year - the entity must not choose an amount that would result in the entity having an amount of excess franking offsets for that year. In other words, you can only deduct a tax loss from your total assessable income to the extent that the tax losses are not required to be deducted from the net exempt income in accordance with subsections 36-17(3) and (4) of the ITAA 1997. An exception to this is contained in section 24AY of the ITAA 1936, which provides that prior year tax losses are not deductible: If a body is an STB on the last day of a year of income in which it incurs a tax loss, the tax loss is not allowable as a deduction from the body's assessable income of a later year of income unless the body is an STB on the first day of that later year of income. Section 36-25 of the ITAA 1997 provides special rules about tax losses of certain entities. This section states that where a company wants to deduct a tax loss, it cannot do so unless it passes the Continuity of Ownership Test (COT) or, if the entity does not satisfy the COT, the company satisfies the Same Business Test (SBT). The SBT is set out under Subdivision 165-E of the ITAA 1997, where section 165-210 provides that: 165-210(1) A company satisfies the same business test if throughout the same business test period it carries on the same business as it carried on immediately before the test time. 165-210(2) However, the company does not satisfy the same business test if, at any time during the same business test period, it derives assessable income from: (a) a business of a kind that it did not carry on before the test time; or (b) a transaction of a kind that it had not entered into in the course of its business operations before the test time. 165-210(3) The company also does not satisfy the same business test if, before the test time, it: (a) started to carry on a business it had not previously carried on; or (b) in the course of its business operations, entered into a transaction of a kind that it had not previously entered into; and did so for the purpose, or for purposes including the purpose, of being taken to have carried on throughout the same business test period the same business as it carried on immediately before the test time. 165-210(4) So far as the same business test is applied for the purpose of Subdivision 165-B (which is about working out the taxable income and tax loss for the income year of change of ownership or control), the company also does not satisfy the test if, at any time during the same business test period, it incurs expenditure: (a) in carrying on a business of a kind that it did not carry on before the test time; or (b) as a result of a transaction of a kind that it had not entered into in the course of its business operations before the test time. As the SBT operates in relation to analysis of specific events and specific times in the course of carrying on a business throughout a specific period, and certain of those necessary events and times relevant to the test have not yet occurred; it cannot be determined at this time whether the entity satisfies the SBT under section 165-210 of the ITAA 1997. Therefore, subject to the satisfaction of the same business test under section 165-13 of the ITAA 1997 and adjustment for the net exempt income derived in the period that the entity is a STB, the tax losses incurred by the entity during the period before it became a STB will be available for offset against taxable income derived by the entity in the period after it is no longer a STB.

2. Subject to the satisfaction of the 'same business test' under section 165-13 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997) and adjustment for the net exempt income derived in the period the entity is a STB; are the tax losses incurred by the entity during the period before it became a STB available for offset against taxable income derived for an income year in the period after it is no longer a STB? | Relevant facts: The entity is a private company limited solely by shares. | Prior to month 200X the shares in the entity were held by various entities, including individuals and private companies. | In 200Y, the entity and the State in which it is based and entered into arrangements under which the entity was appointed by the State to construct and create a project (the Project). | The shareholders in the entity requested to terminate their involvement in, and obligations in respect of, the Project. | A Deed was made by the State, the entity shareholders and other relevant parties involved in the Project, to terminate their involvement and obligations in respect of the Project. | The parties to the Deed agreed to effect the termination through: | · the purchase by the State of the shares in the entity; | · the termination of the previous Terminating Agreements; and | · the giving of the release set out in the Deed. | By the Deed the State purchased 100% of the issued shares in the entity. The State continues to hold 100% of the issued shares in the entity. | The entity has not entered into any deed of arrangement in relation to the ownership or control of the company since the purchase. | The entity had incurred tax losses prior to month 200X.