Private ruling: CGT - r eporting liability
Date of advice: 24 May 2024
Published: 8 July 2024
Ruling period: Financial year ended 30 June 20xx
Date scheme commenced: 1 July 20xx

Ruling: Q1: Can the individual taxpayers defer reporting the capital gain on the sale of a property in their income tax assessments for the income year ending 30 June 20xx until settlement occurs? | A1: Yes. | Q2: Can all General Interest Charges and/or penalties be waived or fully remitted, providing an amended tax return is lodged within 30 Days of the final settlement date when the bulk of the sale proceeds will be received? | A2: Decline to rule.

Relevant facts and circumstances: The Taxpayers jointly own a property (the Property). The Property includes a standard house on X acres of land in a residential zone. The Property has been owned by the taxpayers since 20xx. The Property has been continuously rented since it was purchased and all income declared in the relevant tax returns for each year. The contract was signed to sell the Property by the taxpayers on xx (the date of exchange).The contract allowed for a xx% deposit with an amount of $xx to be paid on signing and the balance of the deposit to be paid at the expiration of 30 days from the date of exchange, being the conclusion of the due diligence period. A further instalment of xx% to be paid upon the removal of a caveat on the Property. A further xx% instalment to be paid at the expiration of xx months from the date of exchange. A final instalment being the balance of the price to be paid at the expiration of xx months from the date of exchange. Settlement of the Property is due in 20xx when the balance of the purchase price will be paid.

Relevant legislative provisions: Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 subsection 104-10(3) | Tax Administration Act 1953 section 357-110

Reasons for decision: Summary: The Taxpayers can defer the capital gain on the sale of the Property in their income tax assessment for the income year ending 30 June 20xx, until settlement of the contract occurs. | Detailed Reasoning - Detailed reasoning: The time that CGT event A1 happens is when the taxpayer enters into the contract for the disposal of the CGT asset. A legislative example is provided in section 104-10(3) as follows: | Detailed Reasoning - Example:: In June 1999 you enter into a contract to sell land. The contract is settled in October 1999. You make a capital gain of $50,000. The gain is made in the 1998-99 income year (the year you entered into the contract) and not the 1999-2000 income year (the year that settlement takes place). This example illustrates that, where a contract is entered into at a different time to when it is settled, it is the time that the contract is entered into that is relevant. The time of settlement is in effect ignored. Taxation Determination TD 94/89: Income tax: capital gains: in what year of income is a taxpayer required for tax purposes to include a capital gain or loss in relation to land disposed of under a contract which is made in one year of income, but which is settled in a later year of income? at paragraph 3 explains that a taxpayer is not required to include any capital gain or loss in the appropriate year until an actual change of ownership occurs. Settlement effects a change of ownership and a disposal. When settlement occurs, the taxpayer is then required to include any capital gain or loss in the year of income in which the contract was made. If an assessment has already been made for that year of income, the taxpayer may need to have that assessment amended. | Detailed Reasoning - Application to your circumstances: The Taxpayers jointly purchased the Property in 20xx. It was used for income producing activity until it was sold in 20xx, being the year the contract for its sale was executed. Settlement of the contract for the sale of the Property is scheduled to occur in 20xx. At this time, the Taxpayers will be required to amend their income tax returns for the income year ending 30 June 20xx to include the capital gain made, as CGT event A1 happened to the Property when the sale contract was executed on xx 20xx. TD 94/89 at paragraph 5 states where an assessment is amended to include a net capital gain, and a liability for interest arises, the remission of interest will be dealt with in each case on its own merits. This paragraph makes clear that this amendment must be made within a reasonable time after the date of settlement. In most cases, we would consider a period of one month after settlement to be a reasonable period. | Summary: The Commissioner declines to rule on this question as it requires the Commissioner to rule based on assumptions about future events or other matters (section 357-110 Tax Administration Act 1953 ). As the guidance in paragraph 5 of TD 94/89 explains, where an assessment is amended to include a net capital gain and a liability for interest arises, the remission of interest will be dealt with in each case on its own merits. The Commissioners discretion to remit interest would ordinarily be exercised to remit the interest in full where requests for amendment are lodged, and where relevant, self-amendments are made, within a reasonable time after the date of settlement. In most cases, we would consider a period of one month after settlement to be reasonable period. The Commissioner is unable to make any decision on the remission of interest charges and/or penalties until such a time as a liability for interest and/or penalties arise. If interest charges or penalties do arise, a taxpayer is able to request a remission of these by following the relevant process that is in place and published on the ATO website at the time that they arise.

Reasons for decision: All legislation references are to the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 unless stated otherwise.