Private ruling: International residency and CGT
Date of advice: 31 May 2018
Published: August 2018
Ruling period: Year ended 30 June 20AA | Year ended 30 June 20BB | Year ended 30 June 20CC
Date scheme commenced: Winter 20XX

Ruling: Q1: Was I a resident between Winter 20XX and Spring 20XX? | A1: No | Q2: Did I become a resident in Spring 20XX when I returned to Australia? | A2: Yes | Q3: Am I required to lodge tax returns for the income years 20AA to 20BB? | A3: Declined to Rule | Q4: Would I be deemed to have acquired my assets (except taxable Australian property) in Spring 20XX for their market value at that time pursuant to Section 855-45 of the ITAA 1997? | A4: Yes | Q5: Was the value of shares in XYZ Pty Ltd $X for the purposes of Section 855-45(2) of the ITAA 1997? | A5: Ruling to be issued at a later date

Relevant facts and circumstances: You met your spouse when they travelled to Country B in Autumn 20XX. You married and applied for and received a Country A spouse visa and joined your spouse in Country A in Spring 20XX. You have lived together since that date. You established a home in Country A. You and your family travelled to Australia in Winter 20XX to meet your spouse’s family and friends. You and your family again travelled to Australia in Summer 20YY to visit a grandmother who had an illness. In Spring 20ZZ you received indefinite leave to remain in Country A as an independent resident, moving off the spouse visa. In Spring 20AA you applied for and were granted and Australian residency permit. In Summer 20BB you and your family travelled to Australia for Christmas and stayed until 20CC. During this period you were employed at Entity A as a part-time employee. In Summer 20DD you and your family travelled to Australia for a period of convalescence to assist your spouse’s health. You stayed in Australia until Autumn 20EE and during this period you were employed by Entity B. On DDMMYY you acquired X shares in XYZ Pty Ltd. In Spring 20XX you and your family returned permanently to Australia and completed the immigration entry card as “a resident returning to Australia”. You have since enrolled your children in a local school. You were granted a permanent visa in Summer 20YY which allows you to stay in Australia for an indefinite period.

Relevant legislative provisions: Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Subsection 995-1(1) | Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Subsection 855-45 | Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Subsection 855-45(2) | Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 Subsection 6(1)

Reasons for decision: Summary: Section 6-5 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997) provides that where you are a resident of Australia for taxation purposes, your assessable income includes income gained from all sources, whether in or out of Australia. However, where you are a foreign resident, your assessable income includes only income derived from an Australian source. The terms 'resident' and 'resident of Australia', in regard to an individual, are defined in subsection 6(1) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (ITAA 1936). The definition provides four tests to ascertain whether a taxpayer is a resident of Australia for income tax purposes. These tests are: ● the resides test, ● the domicile test, ● the 183 day test, and ● the superannuation test. The primary test for deciding the residency status of an individual is whether the individual resides in Australia according to the ordinary meaning of the word resides. However, where an individual does not reside in Australia according to ordinary concepts, they may still be considered to be a resident of Australia for tax purposes if they meet the conditions of one of the other three tests. | Detailed Reasoning - Resides Test: The outcomes of several Administrative Appeals Tribunal (AAT) cases have determined that the word ' resides' should be given the widest meaning and there have been a number of factors identified which can assist in determining if a particular taxpayer is a resident of Australia under this test. The Courts and the Tribunal have generally taken into account the following eight factors in considering whether an individual is an Australian resident according to ordinary concepts in an income year: ● Physical presence in Australia; ● Nationality; ● History of residence and movements; ● Habits and ‘mode of life’ ● Frequency, regularity and duration of visits to Australia; ● Purpose of visits to or absences from Australia; ● Family and business ties with Australia compared to the foreign country concerned; and ● Maintenance of a place of abode. These factors are similar to those which the Commissioner has said are relevant in determining the residency status of individuals in IT 2650 and Taxation Ruling TR 98/ 17 Income tax: residency status of individuals entering Australia . It is important to note that not one single factor is decisive and the weight given to each factor depends on individual circumstances. In Landy v FC of T 2016 ATC 10-435 ;[2016] AATA 754, the taxpayer took on a supervisory role at an oilfield in Oman that lasted 21 months. On or before departure, he cancelled his Medicare, notified his private health insurance fund, requested his name be removed from the electoral roll and completed an outgoing passenger card indicating that he was leaving Australia permanently. However, throughout his employment in Oman he financially supported his wife in Australia, garaged his two motor vehicles at her home, maintained a joint bank account with his wife, maintained his offices as director and secretary of an Australian company (his wife being the other director and shareholder) and resumed living with his wife on his return. The AAT found that the taxpayer's lack of severance of connections with Australia, and the lack of establishment of enduring and lasting living ties with Oman, required a conclusion that the taxpayer had not ceased to be a resident of Australia as ordinarily understood. In your case, you are a citizen of Country B who travelled to Australia in Spring 20XX with the intention of residing here permanently. You have provided details of your travel to and from Australia which show that you were onshore for X days in the 2018 income year, Y days in the 2017 year and Z days in the 2016 year. Your behaviour is consistent with not residing in Australi a and being considered a non-resident for tax purposes under the resides test until your arrival in Spring 20XX when you travelled to Australia to reside permanently. We will now also include a discussion of the ‘domicile and permanent place of abode’ test as an alternative argument. | Detailed Reasoning - The domicile test: Under the domicile test, a person is a resident of Australia if their domicile is in Australia unless the Commissioner is satisfied they have a permanent place of abode outside of Australia. | Detailed Reasoning - Domicile: “Domicile” is a legal concept to be determined according to the Domicile Act 1982 and common law rules. A person’s domicile is in their country of origin unless they acquire a different domicile of choice or operation of law. To obtain a different domicile of choice, a person must have the intention to make their home indefinitely in another country, usually done by obtaining a migration visa. The domicile of choice which a person has at any time continues until that person acquires a different domicile of choice. In your case, you are a citizen of Country B but have been living in Country A. You have left Country B and have chosen to live in Country A where you have become a citizen with permanent residency. You abandoned your domicile and acquired a domicile of choice in Country A as you have the right to reside permanently in that country. This situation changed when you travelled to Australia in Spring 20XX. On that date you travelled to Australia with the intention of living here permanently with your family. You have acquired a domicile of choice in Australia and have the right to reside here permanently. | Detailed Reasoning - Permanent place of abode: A person’s ‘permanent place of abode’ is a question of fact to be determined in the light of all the circumstances of each case. ( Applegate v. Federal Commissioner of Taxation 78 ATC 4051; 8 ATR 372 ( Applegate )) In Applegate , the court found that ‘permanent’ does not mean everlasting or forever but it is to be contrasted with temporary or transitory. The courts have considered ‘place of abode’ to refer to a person’s residence, where he lives with his family and sleeps at night. Taxation Ruling IT 2650 Income Tax: Residency – Permanent place of abode outside Australia (IT 2650) provides a number factors which are used by the Commissioner in reaching a satisfaction as to an individual’s permanent place of abode. These factors include: (a) the intended and actual length of the individual’s stay in the overseas country; (b) any intention either to return to Australia at some definite point in time or to travel to another country; (c) the intended and actual length of the individual’s stay in the overseas country; (d) any intention either to return to Australia at some definite point in time or to travel to another country; (e) the establishment of a home outside Australia; (f) the abandonment of any residence or place of abode the individual may have had in Australia; (g) the duration and continuity of the individual’s presence in the overseas country; and (h) the durability of association that the individual has with a particular place in Australia, i.e. maintaining bank accounts in Australia, informing government departments, place of education of the taxpayer’s children, family ties. Paragraph 24 of IT 2650 states that the weight to be given to each factor will vary with individual circumstances of each case and no single factor is conclusive. Greater weight should be given to factors (c), (e) and (f) than to the remaining factors. Based on all the facts, the Commissioner is satisfied you have abandoned your permanent place of abode outside Australia. Therefore you are considered a resident of Australia under this test from the date you arrived in Australia with the intention of living her permanently with your family. | Detailed Reasoning - The 183 days test: Where a person is present in Australia for 183 days during the year of income the person will be a resident, unless the Commissioner is satisfied that the person’s usual place of abode is outside Australia and the person does not intend to take up residence in Australia. In your circumstances your travel to Australia has limited to relatively brief visits until you returned in 20XX. You have provided details of your travel to and from Australia which show that you were onshore for X days in the 2018 income year, Y days in the 2017 year and Z days in the 2016 year. Accordingly, you will be treated as a resident under this test after Spring 20XX. | Detailed Reasoning - The superannuation test: An individual is still considered to be a resident if that person is eligible to contribute to the Public Sector Superannuation Scheme (PSS) or the Commonwealth Superannuation Scheme (CSS), or that person is the spouse or child under 16 of such a person. You are not a contributing member of the PSS or the CSS or a spouse of such a person, or a child under 16 of such a person. You will not be treated as a resident under this test. | Detailed Reasoning - Residency status: As you satisfy three of the four tests of residency outlined in subsection 6(1) of the ITAA 1936, you are a resident of Australia for income tax purposes from Spring 20XX. | Detailed Reasoning - Reasons for decision – taxation returns: The question of whether to lodge taxation returns does not arise as you have lodged returns up to 20XX. Accordingly the Commissioner declines to rule in this matter. | Detailed Reasoning - Reasons for decision – section 855-45: This section provides that “The first element of the cost base and reduced cost base of the asset (at the time you become an Australian resident) is its market value at the time”. This section is subject to section 768-950, individuals who become Australian residents and who are temporary residents immediately after they become Australian residents. However, in your case, you were not a temporary resident when you arrived in Australia, so section 768-950 does not apply. Accordingly, the first element of the costs base and reduced cost base of your assets is their market value at the time you became a resident.