Private ruling: Capital gains tax and beneficial ownership
Published: June 2013
Date scheme commenced: 1 July 2012

Ruling: Question and answer: | Are you entitled to disregard any capital gain or loss that results from the disposal of the property? | Yes.


Relevant legislative provisions: Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 104-10 | Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 106-50 | Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 102-20

Reasons for decision: Summary: You make a capital gain or capital loss if a CGT event happens to a CGT asset under section 102-20 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997). Property is considered to be a CGT asset. Under section 104-10 of the ITAA, CGT event A1 occurs if you dispose of your ownership interest in a CGT asset. You dispose of that interest if a change of ownership occurs from you to another entity. When considering the disposal of a CGT asset, the most important element in the application of the CGT provisions is ownership. It must be determined who is the legal owner of the property. In absence to the contrary, the property is considered to be owned by person(s) registered on the title. It is possible for legal ownership to differ from beneficial ownership. However where beneficial ownership and legal ownership of an asset are not the same, there must be evidence that the legal owner holds the property in trust for the beneficial owner. We have considered the facts that you have provided in order to determine whether a trust was created in relation to the property. There are three kinds of trusts: constructive, express, or resulting. | Detailed Reasoning - Constructive Trusts: A constructive trust is a trust imposed by operation of law, regardless of the intentions of the parties concerned, whenever equity considers it unconscionable for the party holding title to the property in question to deny the interest claimed by another. The existence of a constructive trust is, however, dependent upon the order of the court, even though that order may operate retrospectively by dating the origin of the trust from some earlier wrongful act. For a constructive trust to exist there needs to be a court order. In your case, there was not a court order in place therefore no constructive trust exists. | Detailed Reasoning - Express Trusts: An express trust is one intentionally created by the owner of property in order to confer a benefit upon another. It is created by express declaration, which can be effected by some agreement or common intention held by the parties to the trust. In your case, you do not have any documentary evidence that supports the creation of an express trust over the property. Such documents would constitute a declaration of trust and make clear the terms of the trust. The absence of such a document means that an express trust cannot exist. | Detailed Reasoning - Resulting or Implied Trusts: A resulting trust, sometimes called an implied trust, arises by operation of law in favour of the creator of some prior trust or other interest in certain circumstances. Those circumstances fall into two broad classifications: · cases in which a settlor fails to completely dispose of the beneficial interest, or where a surplus arises after the original purpose of a trust has been satisfied or has ceased to exist, and · cases in which someone purchases property in the name of another. A trust is presumed in favour of the party providing the purchase money. Where an individual purchases and pays for a property but legal title is transferred to another person at their direction, if that person is a stranger, the presumption of resulting trust arises and the property is held in trust for them. However where the property is transferred to the taxpayer's immediate family, the presumption of resulting trust is replaced by the presumption of advancement which deems the purchase to be prima facie intended to advance the interests of the family members (that is, an absolute gift). The consequence of the presumption of advancement being upheld is that the parties will hold their equitable interests in the property in the same proportions as their legal interests unless they can rebut the presumption of advancement. In your situation the presumption of advancement is rebutted on the following grounds: Your parent · provided all the funds to purchase the property; · was solely included in the lease contract; · received all of the rental income from the property; · paid all of the expenses in relation to the property; · included in their income tax return all income and expenses relating to the property; and · received all proceeds from the disposal of the property. Further you and your siblings played no part in any activity relating to the property. In light of the above, the Commissioner is satisfied that an implied trust did exist with regards to the property and the presumption of advancement is rebutted. Therefore you and your siblings acted as trustees in relation to the property with your parent being the beneficiary. Accordingly, you are entitled to disregard any capital gain or loss that resulted from the disposal of the property.

Relevant facts: Your parent purchased a property post 19 September 1985. | Your parent paid the full purchase price of the property. | Your parent in addition to their own name, listed you and your siblings on the title deed of the property. | The reason that your parent included the names of you and your siblings on the title deed is that at the time they were of the belief that this would simplify their estate upon their death. | From the day that the property was purchased it has been used as a rental property. | Your parent was exclusively listed on the lease documents for the rental property. | During the entire ownership period your parent has received all rental income, paid all expenses and included all income and loses in their income tax return. | During the entire period of ownership, you and your siblings have played no part in the management of the property. | The property was disposed of in the relevant income year. | Your parent received all proceeds that resulted from the disposal of the property.