Private ruling: CGT - extension of time to acquire replacement asset
Date of advice: 1 June 2023
Published: 24 July 2023
Ruling period: DD MM YYYY to DD MM YYYY
Date scheme commenced: DD MM YYYY

Ruling: Q1: Will the Commissioner exercise the discretional power under paragraph 124-75(3)(b) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 ('ITAA 1997') to extend the one-year period for the taxpayer to acquire a replacement asset to DD MM YYYY? | A1: Yes.

Relevant facts and circumstances: 1. The taxpayer owned a property located at XXX ('the property'). 2. The property was compulsorily acquired by a State Authority in DD YYYY. 3. Possession was taken at that date. 4. The taxpayer received $xyz in MM YYYY, being xx% of the compensation offered. 5. The taxpayer believes the State Authority's preliminary valuation is fundamentally underestimated and is seeking a settlement in excess of $xx million. 6. It is difficult to determine how long it will take for a settlement to be reached. The matter may not settle in the year ending MM YYYY. 7. Given that the taxpayer has received approximately less than half the potential consideration, it has not been possible to acquire a replacement asset. Additionally, without a final valuation/price, the rollover amount is not known. 8. As such, the minimum amount required to be spent on the replacement asset cannot be determined. 9. Therefore, the taxpayer is requesting that the Commissioner takes into account these special circumstances and grants an extension to the period to acquire a replacement asset to DD MM YYYY. 10. The Commissioner has previously issued a Private Binding Ruling to the taxpayer, dated DD MM YYYY, where an extension was granted to extend the time to find a replacement asset until DD MM YYYY. Information provided 11. You have provided a number of documents containing detailed information in relation to the taxpayer's application including: • Private Binding Ruling ('PBR') Application, dated DD MM YYYY 12. We have referred to the relevant information within these documents in applying the relevant tests to your circumstances. Assumption(s) Not applicable.

Relevant legislative provisions: Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Subdivision 124-B | Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Subsection 124-70(1) | Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Subsection 124-70(2) | Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Subsection 124-75(3) | Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Subsection 124-75(4) | Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Subsection 124-75(5) | Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Subsection 124-75(6) | Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Subsection 995-1(1) Further issues for you to consider | Not applicable.

Reasons for decision: Summary: All legislative references are to the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 ('ITAA 1997') unless otherwise stated. The Commissioner will exercise the discretion under paragraph 124-75(3)(b) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 ('ITAA 1997') to extend the one-year period for the taxpayer to acquire a replacement asset until DD MM YYYY. | Detailed Reasoning - DETAILED REASONING: 13. Roll-over relief for the compulsory acquisition of a CGT asset is available where the conditions outlined in Subdivision 124-B of the ITAA 1997 are met. 14. Under subsection 124-70(1) of the ITAA 1997, an entity may be able to choose a replacement asset rollover if a CGT asset owned by the entity is compulsorily acquired by an Australian government agency as per paragraph 124-70(1)(a) of the ITAA 1997. 15. A replacement-asset rollover allows you, in special cases, to defer the making of a capital gain or loss from one CGT event until a later CGT event happens. 16. Subsection 995-1(1) of the ITAA 1997 defines an Australian government agency as a Commonwealth, a State or a Territory, or an authority of Commonwealth or of a State or Territory. 17. A further requirement is that the owner of the original asset must receive money or another CGT asset or both, for the CGT event to be eligible for a rollover (subsection 124-70(2) of the ITAA 1997). On satisfying these conditions, section 124-75 of the ITAA 1997 provides other requirements which must be satisfied if money is received for the event happening. 18. Subsection 124-75(2) of the ITAA 1997 requires that the owner of the asset must incur expenditure in acquiring another CGT asset. Subsection 124-75(3) of ITAA 1997 requires the entity to incur some of that expenditure either one year before or one year after the end of the income year in which the event happens, or within such further time as the Commissioner allows in special circumstances. 19. Subsection 124-75(4) of the ITAA 1997 requires that the replacement asset acquired must be used for the same or similar purpose as the taxpayer used the original asset. This replacement asset cannot become an item of trading stock just after the acquisition or be a depreciating asset (subsection 124-75(5) of ITAA 1997), nor become a "registered emissions unit" just after the acquisition (subsection 124-75(6) of ITAA 1997). 20. In determining whether special circumstances exist for the Commissioner to extend the period in which to acquire a replacement asset, Taxation DeterminationTD 2000/40 "Income tax: capital gains: what are 'special circumstances' for the purposes of subsection 124-75(3) of the ITAA 1997?" ('TD 2000/40') provides guidance on interpreting subsection 124-75(3) of the ITAA 1997, in particular, what are 'special circumstances'. 21. TD 2000/40 states that the expression 'special circumstances' by its nature is incapable of a precise or exhaustive definition. What constitutes 'special circumstances' depends on the facts of each particular case. 22. Example 3 in TD 2000/40 provides an illustration in which a taxpayer's asset is compulsorily acquired by a State authority. The taxpayer is then involved in a protracted legal dispute with the authority over the quantum of the compensation. In this instance, the Commissioner accepts that there are special circumstances to allow further time for the taxpayer. 23. In determining whether the discretion will be exercised, the Commissioner also considers the following factors: • there should be evidence of an acceptable explanation for the period of the extension requested and that it would be fair and equitable in the circumstances to provide such an extension; • account must be had to any prejudice to the Commissioner which may result from the additional time being allowed, however the mere absence of prejudice is not enough to justify the granting of an extension; • account must be had of any unsettling of people, other than the Commissioner, or of established practices; • there must be a consideration of fairness to people in like positions and the wider public interest; • whether there is any mischief involved; and a consideration of the consequences. | Detailed Reasoning - APPLICATION TO YOUR CIRCUMSTANCES: 24. The property located at XXX was compulsorily acquired by a State Authority in MM YYYY. 25. The taxpayer received $xyz in MM YYYY, being xx% of the compensation offered. 26. The taxpayer believes the State Authority's preliminary valuation is fundamentally underestimated and is seeking a settlement in excess of $xx million. The taxpayer is intending to object to the valuation. It is difficult to determine how long it will take for a settlement to be reached. 27. Given that the taxpayer has received approximately less than half the potential consideration, it has not been possible to acquire a replacement asset. Additionally, without a final valuation/price, the rollover amount is not known. 28. As such, the minimum amount required to be spent on the replacement asset cannot be determined at this stage. 29. TD 2000/40's Example 3 provides an illustration in which a taxpayer's asset is compulsorily acquired by a State Authority. The taxpayer is then involved in a protracted legal dispute with the authority over the quantum of the compensation. In this instance, the Commissioner accepts that there are special circumstances to allow further time for the taxpayer. 30. The taxpayer's situation mirrors Example 3 of the special circumstances within TD 2000/40. 31. Based on these facts, it is deemed that special circumstances do exist to warrant the Commissioner to exercise his discretion and allow an extension of time to obtain a replacement asset, as it would be fair and equitable to do so, given that the circumstances represent an acceptable explanation for the delay. 32. Also, by granting this extension of time to acquire replacement asset: • there does not appear to be any prejudice to the Commissioner or any other parties; • there is no unsettling of people or of established practices; • there does not appear to be any mischief involved in this case; and • the Commissioner considers it to be fair to people in like positions and the wider public interest. 33. Therefore, the Commissioner will exercise the discretion under paragraph 124-75(3)(b) of the ITAA 1997 to allow an extension of time to obtain a replacement asset for landholdings that were compulsorily acquired by the State Authority until DD MM YYYY. | Detailed Reasoning - CONCLUSION: The Commissioner will exercise the discretion under paragraph 124-75(3)(b) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 ('ITAA 1997') to extend the one-year period for the taxpayer to acquire a replacement asset until DD MM YYYY.