Private ruling: Home to work travel
Published: October 2014
Ruling period: Year ended 30 June 2014
Date scheme commenced: 1 July 2013

Ruling: Q1: Are you entitled to a deduction for home to work travel? | A1: Yes.


Relevant legislative provisions: Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 8-1

Reasons for decision: Summary: Section 8-1 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 deals with general deductions and allows a deduction for all losses or outgoings to the extent to which they are incurred in gaining or producing assessable income, except to the extent that they are outgoings of a capital, private or domestic nature. Generally the expenses of travel to and from work are not deductible. This is either because such expenditure is private in nature, or because it is not an expense incurred in gaining or producing assessable income. The case of Lunney & Hayley v. Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1958) 100 CLR 478; (1958) 7 AITR 166; (1958) 11 ATD 404 settled the principle that travel to and from work is ordinarily not deductible. The Full High Court held that costs incurred by a taxpayer in travelling to the place where they work are expenses incurred in order to enable them to earn income but are not expenses incurred in the course of earning that income. The travel is considered to be of an essentially private or domestic nature. However, the Commissioner accepts that expenses incurred by employees in travelling to and from work are deductible in certain circumstances. One of the exceptions to the general view is where the employee is required to transport bulky equipment necessary for employment. Paragraphs 63 and 64 of Taxation Ruling TR 95/34 explain that a deduction may be allowed in circumstances where: • the cost can be attributed to the transportation of bulky equipment rather than to private travel between home and work • it is essential to transport the equipment to and from work and it is not done as a matter of convenience or personal choice, and • there are no secure facilities available for storage of the bulky equipment at the work place. The question of what constitutes bulky equipment must be considered according to the individual circumstances in each case. To establish if the equipment you carry is bulky, consideration must be given to its size and weight. In Crestani v. FC of T 98 ATC 2219; (1998) 40 ATR 1037, a toolbox which measured 57 x 28 x 25 centimetres and weighed 27 kilograms was considered as bulky, in the sense of cumbersome, and the transport cost was attributable to the transportation of such bulky equipment rather than private travel between home and work. The employer did not provide a secure storage area for the toolbox and the use of public transport was not a viable option. It is considered that your equipment is bulky, in the sense of cumbersome. Furthermore, you cannot leave the equipment in storage at work because of your separate work sites and you do not carry the equipment as a matter of convenience or personal choice. Therefore, you are entitled to a deduction for travel expenses between home and work.

You work at different locations. | You carry equipment which is not heavy but is very bulky. It is contained in boxes of four to six each about the size of a head, a shoe box, a laptop and a briefcase size. | The equipment fills up the boot of your car and is really awkward. | You need to take all of the equipment. | You keep a log book of your travel.