Private ruling: international voyages
Published: March 2012

Ruling: Q1: Would unintentional change to two particular international travels affect their GST treatment? | A1: No, the unintentional change to the two particular international trips will not affect their GST treatment.

Relevant facts and circumstances: You are registered for GST and supply international travels. On two particular international travels, there were some mechanical problems with the vessel. Hence, the vessel could not cross into international zones to proceed to a foreign destination, but did continue the travel along the Australian zone to the other scheduled stopovers. Reasons for the decision: Your international travels are ticketed as international travels between Australia and a foreign destination. On two particular trips, there were mechanical problems with the vessel, which prevented the vessel from crossing into international zones to proceed to a foreign destination. In this instance, we take the approach of ATOID 2006/114, which considers if excise duty is payable on carriers stores that are consumed during an aborted international trip. It stated that: 'it is reasonable to accept that where a vessel leaves a destination with the genuine intention of undertaking an overseas trip, it is an overseas vessel under the definition of 'ship' in the Customs Act, notwithstanding the fact that at some point, through misadventure or some other eventuality, it has to turn around.' The definition of 'ship' in the Customs Act refers to international voyage. Further, Goods and Services Tax Ruling GSTR 2005/2 made the following point (although it relates to goods, the principle could be applied): 59. If there is a genuine intention when the supply is made, supported by documentary evidence, that the goods are destined for a place outside Australia, but the intention later changes such that the goods do not depart Australia, the requirement that the goods had a destination outside Australia is met. That is, the item requires the intended destination to be a place outside Australia. However, the absence of actual departure of the goods may be evidence that the intended destination was not outside Australia. Accordingly, the two particular trips would remain international voyages, even if there were unintentional changes to the scheduled international voyages.



Please check this edited version to be sure that there are no details remaining that you think may allow you to be identified. Contact us at the address given in the fact sheet if you have any concerns.