Private ruling: Residency
Date of advice: 9 November 2020
Published: January 2021
Ruling period: Income year ended 30 June 20XX | Income year ending 30 June 20XX | Income year ending 30 June 20XX | Income year ending 30 June 20XX
Date scheme commenced: June 20XX

Ruling: Q1: Are you a resident of Australia for taxation purposes from your departure date? | A1: No.

Relevant facts and circumstances: You are an Australian citizen. You have taken up the role with a company registered in a foreign country. The role is a full-time contract and the employment contract is for X-years. You have not been previously employed by them. You departed Australia to take up your role in a foreign country. Your salary will be administered in the local currency. Given your seniority, you will also be provided executive housing under the terms of your contract. You were residing in Australia until your date of departure. Although you have a history of residing in Australia, you have previously resided in other countries. You will obtain a resident visa (work permit) for your role. As is customary in a foreign country, the visa is required to be renewed each year. It is sponsored by your employer. Subject to COVID-19 restrictions, you are expected to travel to Australia a couple of times a year. You will be based in a foreign country and will not be required to travel to Australia for work. While in a foreign country, there is the potential for short business trips to another country. You have an Australian spouse and children. The children are all independent and will not relocate with you. Some of your children have previously moved out of the family home. Your spouse will remain in Australia temporarily to oversee the matters and will join you in a foreign country at the soonest practical time, which is anticipated to be late 20XX. Subject to COVID-19 restrictions, your spouse is expected to return two to three times a year to visit your oldest child and undertake some work. This will be less than 90 days per year. You will be provided housing for the entire duration of the X-year assignment for you and your spouse to reside. This will be fully furnished so there is minimal requirement to transfer substantial household effects. The accommodation is always for you and your spouse's sole use. The apartment is provided by your employer. You are required to sign terms and conditions of occupancy with the landlord. Your financial interests and assets in Australia: • You have a house which is jointly owned with your spouse. • You have an investment property which is rented out. • A property which will be occupied by a child. • Australian shares and an Australian bank account. You have advised Australian financial institutions with which you have investments that you are a foreign resident so that non-resident withholding tax can be deducted. Your financial interests and assets in a foreign country : • A bank account for receiving your salary. • You have a motor vehicle provided by your employer. • You currently have no other investments or assets in a foreign country. • You will obtain a driver's licence in the foreign country. You will cancel your Australian private health insurance. The Australian Electoral Commission has been informed of your departure and you are in the process of informing Medicare. You held several Australian positions from which you have resigned upon taking up your position in a foreign country: You will continue to hold a club membership in Australia. Neither you nor your spouse is a member of the Commonwealth Superannuation Scheme or Public Superannuation Scheme. You have never been employed by the Commonwealth of Australia.

Relevant legislative provisions: Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 Subsection 6(1) | Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 6-5 | Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Subsection 995-1(1)

Reasons for decision: Summary: You are not a resident of Australia for taxation purposes from the date of your departure. | Detailed Reasoning - Detailed reasoning: Section 6-5 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997) provides that where you are a resident of Australia for taxation purposes, your assessable income includes income gained from all sources, whether in or out of Australia. However, if you are a foreign resident, your assessable income includes only income derived from an Australian source (subsection 6-5(3) of the ITAA 1997). The terms resident and resident of Australia, in regard to an individual, are defined in subsection 6(1) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (ITAA 1936). The definition provides four tests to ascertain whether a taxpayer is a resident of Australia. These tests are: 2. the domicile test 3. the 183-day test 4. the superannuation test The primary test for deciding the residency status of an individual is whether the individual resides in Australia according to the ordinary meaning of the word resides. However, where an individual does not reside in Australia according to ordinary concepts, they may still be considered to be a resident of Australia for tax purposes if they meet the conditions of one of the other three tests. | Detailed Reasoning - 1. The resides test: The resides test considers whether an individual is residing in Australia according to the ordinary meaning of the word 'reside'. As the word 'reside' is not defined in Australian taxation law, it takes its ordinary meaning for the purposes of subsection 6(1) of the ITAA 1936. The ordinary meaning of the word 'reside', according to the Macquarie Dictionary , 2001, rev. 3 rd edition, The Macquarie Library Pty Ltd, NSW, is 'to dwell permanently or for a considerable time; having one's abode for a time', and according to the Compact Edition of the Oxford English Dictionary (1987), is 'to dwell permanently, or for a considerable time, to have one's settled or usual abode, to live in or at a particular place'. In considering the definition of 'reside', the High Court of Australia, in Federal Commissioner of Taxation v Miller (1946) 73 CLR 93 at page 99-100, per Latham CJ, noted the term 'reside' should be given a wide meaning for the purposes of section 6(1) of the ITAA 1936. Similarly, in Subrahmanyam v Commissioner of Taxation 2002 ATC 2303, Deputy President Forgie said at paragraphs 43 and 44 that the widest meaning should be attributed to the word 'reside'. The question of whether an individual 'resides' in a particular country is a question of fact and degree and not of law. In deciding this question, the courts have consistently referred to and taken into account the following factors as being relevant: (i) physical presence in Australia; (ii) nationality; (iii) history of residence and movements; (iv) habits and 'mode of life'; (v) frequency, regularity and duration of visits to Australia; (vi) purpose of visits to or absences from Australia; (vii) family and business ties with Australia compared to the foreign country concerned; and (viii) maintenance of a place of abode. The weight given to each factor varies with individual circumstances and no single factor is necessarily decisive. In Shand v Federal Commissioner of Taxation 2003 ATC 2080, the Tribunal stated (at 35): Questions of residence, domicile, permanent place of abode, have frequently been found by the courts and tribunals to be difficult to assess on a factual level and not easy to define in concrete legal terms. To determine whether or not you are residing in Australia for taxation purposes, it is necessary for us to examine each of these factors in the context of your circumstances. (i) Physical presence in Australia It is important to note that a person does not necessarily cease to be a resident because he or she is physically absent from Australia. In Joachim v Federal Commissioner of Taxation 2002 ATC 2088 , the Tribunal stated (at 2090): Physical presence and intention will coincide for most of the time but few people are always at home. Once a person has established a home in a particular place, even involuntary, a person does not necessarily cease to be resident there because he or she is physically absent. The test is, whether the person has retained a continuity of association with the place, together with an intention to return to that place and an attitude that the place remains home. Further, in Iyengar v. Federal Commissioner of Taxation 2011 ATC 10-222, (2011) AATA, the Tribunal stated (at 62): Physical presence in a country for some period during a particular year of income is usually considered by the courts as necessary in order that a person should be resident in that country during that particular income year. However, there have been exceptions to this: Rogers v Inland Revenue Commissioners (1879) 1 TC 225 and Slater v Commissioner of Taxation (NZ) (1949) 9 ATD 1. In your case, you were residing in Australia until your departure date. On that day you took up residence in a foreign country and have not returned to Australia since. (ii) Nationality You are an Australian citizen. (iii) History of residence and movements You lived and worked in Australia prior to leaving Australia to take up your employment contract in a foreign country. You have previously resided in other foreign countries. (iv) Habits and 'mode of life' Your intention is to live, together with your spouse, in a foreign country for the period of your employment contract. Your spouse will remain in Australia temporarily and will join you in a foreign country at the soonest practical time. You have established a residence in a foreign country in housing provided by your employer; for the duration of your employment. Your spouse will join you there. As it is fully furnished, there is minimal requirement to transfer your household effects. The accommodation is always for you and your spouse's sole use. The apartment is provided by your employer. You are required to sign terms and conditions of occupancy with the landlord. You have resigned from a number of Australian positions as a result of residing in a foreign country. (v) Frequency, regularity and duration of visits to Australia Subject to COVID-19 restrictions, you expect to travel to Australia a couple of times a year. You will be based in a foreign country and will not be required to travel to Australia for work. Also, subject to COVID-19 restrictions, your spouse is expected to return a few times a year to visit a child and undertake some work. The visits will be less than 183 days per year. (vi) Purpose of visits to and absence from Australia The purpose of your absence from Australia is to live and work in a foreign country on a several year employment contract. Your visits to Australia will be short term, not work related and may be reduced by COVID-19 restrictions. (vii) Family, business and financial ties Family You will live with your spouse in a foreign country. Your children are all adults and live independently of you in Australia. Business or economic You have taken up an employment contract in a foreign country for X years. You have resigned several Australian work-related positions upon taking up your position in a foreign country. You have no plans to return to live and work in Australia during that period and have no job being held for you in Australia. Assets In Australia you have your main residence which is jointly owned with your spouse and which is being renovated for the use of a child. You have an Australian investment property, some Australian shares and an Australian bank account. You have advised Australian financial institutions with which you have investments that you are a foreign resident so that non-resident withholding tax can be deducted. In a foreign country you have bank account for receiving your salary, a motor vehicle provided by your employer and will obtain a driver's licence. (viii) Maintenance of a place of abode In a foreign country you are living in accommodation provided for yours and your spouse's exclusive during your time there. In Australia you have a house jointly owned with your spouse which will be used by a child. Summary of the resides test As mentioned above, the weight given to each factor varies with individual circumstances, no single factor is necessarily decisive, and the term 'reside' should be given a wide meaning. In your case, there are various factors that indicate that you have ceased to be a resident of Australia from the date you departed. You moved to a foreign country to take up employment on a contract. Your spouse will join you there. You have established a home there in accommodation provided for your exclusive use. You intend making a few trips to Australia (depending on COVID-19 restrictions). You maintain some assets in Australia such as a house, a rental property and a bank account. Based on the facts of your case, the Commissioner accepts that you ceased residing in Australia according to the ordinary meaning of the word 'reside' upon your departure from Australia for a foreign country and you will not retain a continuity of association with Australia for the period of the ruling. Therefore, you are not a resident of Australia under the 'resides' test of residency. | Detailed Reasoning - 2. The domicile test: If a person's domicile is Australia they will be an Australian resident unless the Commissioner is satisfied they have a permanent place of abode outside of Australia. In order to show that a new domicile of choice in a country outside of Australia has been adopted, the person must be able to prove an intention to make his or her home indefinitely in that country. The concept of Domicile was discussed in the Marriage of Emson (1980) 5 Fam LR 662: A person may abandon his domicile of origin and acquire a domicile of choice but in order to establish a change of domicile there must be clear evidence of an intention to abandon the domicile of origin and to make a new permanent home in the country to which the person has removed. In my view a person cannot be said to acquire a new domicile until there has been a firm intention of establishing a permanent residence in another country and also the confirmation of that intention by actual residence in that country. Declarations as to intention are rightly regarded in determining the question of a change of domicile, but they must be examined by considering the person to whom, the purposes for which, and the circumstances in which they are made and they must further be fortified and carried into effect by conduct and action consistent with the declared expression: Ross v Ross [1930] AC 1 at 6-7 per Lord Buckmaster... Where the court finds that at a relevant point of time there is a conflict between the actual conduct of the party concerned and the verbal expression of his intention doubtless the court will in most cases prefer the act to the word - as an ancient proverb puts it: "what you do speaks so loudly that I cannot hear what you say." Further, in Fremlin v Fremlin (1913) 16 CLR 212; [1913] HCA 25 ( Fremlin v Fremlin ) Per Barton J: In Winans v. Attorney-General, Lord Halsbury L.C. said:-"Now the law is plain, that where a domicile of origin is proved it lies upon the person who asserts a change of domicile to establish it, and it is necessary to prove that the person who is alleged to have changed his domicile had a fixed and determined purpose to make the place of his new domicile his permanent home." In the much older case of Udny v. Udny Lord Westbury said: -"Domicile of choice is a conclusion or inference which the law derives from the fact of a man fixing voluntarily his sole or chief residence in a particular place, with an intention of continuing to reside there for an unlimited time. This is a description of the circumstances which create or constitute a domicile, and not a definition of the term. There must be a residence freely chosen, and not prescribed or dictated by any external necessity, such as the duties of office, the demands of creditors, or the relief from illness; and it must be residence fixed not for a limited period or particular purpose, but general and indefinite in its future contemplation. It is true that residence originally temporary, or intended for a limited period, may afterwards become general and unlimited, and in such a case so soon as the change of purpose, or animus manendi, can be inferred the fact of domicile is established." Lord Curriehill in the case of Donaldson v. M'Clure says: -"To abandon one domicile for another means something far more than a mere change of residence. It imports an intention not only to relinquish those peculiar rights, privileges and immunities which the law and constitution of the domicile confer on the denizens of the country in their domestic relations, in their business transactions, in their political and municipal status, and in the daily affairs of common life, but also the laws by which the succession to property is regulated after death. The abandonment or change of a domicile is therefore a proceeding of a very serious nature, and an intention to make such an abandonment requires to be proved by satisfactory evidence." Lord Halsbury, in Marchioness of Huntly v. Gaskell, expressed strong approval of Lord Curriehill's judgment, quoting this passage. You are a citizen of Australia. Your domicile of origin is Australia because you were born here. As you will not be taking steps to make another country your domicile, your domicile is Australia and remains unchanged while you are in a foreign country Permanent place of abode The expression permanent place of abode refers to a person's residence, where they live with their family and sleep at night. In essence, a person's place of abode is that persons dwelling place or the physical surroundings in which a person lives. A permanent place of abode does not have to be everlasting or forever. It does not mean an abode in which the person intends to live for the rest of his or her life. It should be contrasted with a temporary or transitory place of abode outside of Australia. Taxation Ruling IT 2650 Income Tax: Residency - permanent place of abode outside Australia (IT 2650) outlines some of the factors considered relevant in determining a person's place of abode. These are summarised at paragraph 23 in the ruling as: • the intended and actual length of the individuals stay in the overseas country (a period of two years or more in a country would generally be regarded as a substantial period) • any intention either to return to Australia at some definite point in time or to travel to another country • the establishment of a home outside of Australia • the abandonment of any residence of place of abode the individual may have had in Australia • the duration and continuity of the individual's presence in the overseas country, and • the durability of association that the individual has with a particular place in Australia. You live in a foreign country in rented accommodation which you have established as your home. Your spouse will join your there later. You are employed in a foreign country on a X-year contract and have no intention of returning to Australia except a few times a year. Although Australia remains your domicile and your spouse will join you latter, the Commissioner is satisfied you have established a permanent place of abode outside of Australia you're your departure date. You are not resident of Australia for tax purposes under the domicile test of residency. | Detailed Reasoning - 3. The 183-day test: Where a person is present in Australia for 183 days during a year of income the person will be a resident unless the Commissioner is satisfied that the person's usual place of abode is outside Australia and the person does not intend to take up residence in Australia. In your case, you will not be physically present in Australia for more than 183 days in any income year from your date of departure. You are not a resident of Australia under this test. | Detailed Reasoning - 4. The superannuation test: An individual is still considered to be a resident if that person is eligible to contribute to the Commonwealth Superannuation Scheme (CSS) or the Public Service Superannuation Scheme (PSS), or that person is the spouse or child under 16 of such a person. In your case, you are not a member of the CSS or the PSS or a spouse of such a person, or a child under 16 of such a person. You are not a resident of Australia under this test. | Detailed Reasoning - Your residency status: As you have not past any of the tests of residency, you will not be a resident of Australia for taxation purposes from your departure date.