Private ruling: Early stage innovation companies
Date of advice: 16 July 2021
Published: September 2021
Ruling period: Income year ending 30 June 20XX
Date scheme commenced: XX June 20XX

Ruling: Q1: Does Company A satisfy the criteria of an Early Stage Innovation Company (ESIC) pursuant to subsection 360-40(1) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997)? | A1: Yes

Relevant facts and circumstances: 1. Company A is a proprietary company incorporated during the income year ended 30 June 20XX. 2. Company A was registered in the Australian Business Register (ABR) during the income year ended 30 June 20XX. 3. Company A's first income year will be the year ended 30 June 20XX and therefore did not earn any income or incur any expenses in the prior income year. 4. Company A's equity interests are not listed for quotation in the official list of any stock exchange, either in Australia or a foreign country. 5. Company A is developing a product that is considered disruptive technology with no comparable product in the market place. 6. Company A is the entity which holds this valuable IP and is carrying on an innovative business as described below with the personal involvement of its directors. 7. Company B is a proprietary company that was incorporated in the previous income year. Company A wholly owns Company B but the two entities are not consolidated for income tax purposes. 8. Given the potential value of the IP created and held by Company A, the group was structured such that Company B bears all commercial risks arising from either the demand or supply side of the business. 9. Company B will engage with third party suppliers of services on behalf of Company A. Company A will in turn reimburse Company B at cost for all costs associated with the provision of such services. 10. Company B will use the innovative technology developed by Company A to sell the product. 11. Company B will pay an arm's length license fee to Company A for the right to use its IP and sell its products and services. 12. Company B did not have any activity in the previous income year and therefore did not incur any expenses or earn any income in the previous income year.

Relevant legislative provisions: Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Subdivision 360-A | Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 section 360-40 | Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 section 360-45

Reasons for decision: Summary: Yes. Company A meets the eligibility criteria of an ESIC under subsection 360-40(1) of the ITAA 1997. | Detailed Reasoning - Detailed reasoning: All legislative references are to the ITAA 1997 unless otherwise specified. | Detailed Reasoning - Qualifying ESIC: Subsection 360-40(1) outlines the criteria for a company to qualify as an ESIC at a particular time in an income year. This time is referred to as the "test time". The criteria are based on a series of tests to identify if the company is at an early stage of its development and it is developing new or significantly improved innovations to generate an economic return. | Detailed Reasoning - The early stage test: The early stage test requirements are outlined in detail within paragraphs 360-40(1)(a) to (d) of the ITAA 1997. Paragraph 360-40(1)(a) Incorporation or registration To meet the requirement in paragraph 360-40(1)(a), at a particular time (the test time) in an income year (the current year) the company must have been either: • incorporated in Australia within the last three income years (the latest being the current year); or • incorporated in Australia within the last six income years (the latest being the current year), and across the last three income years before the current year the company and its 100% subsidiaries incurred total expenses of $1 million or less; or • registered in the Australian Business Register (ABR) within the last three income years (the latest being the current income year). The term 'current year' is defined in subsection 360-40(1) with reference to the 'test time'; the 'current year' being the income year in which the company issues shares to the investor. A company that does not meet any of these conditions will not qualify as an ESIC. Paragraph 360-40(1)(b) Total expenses To meet the requirement in paragraph 360-40(1)(b), the company and its 100% subsidiaries must have incurred total expenses of $1 million or less in the income year before the current year. Paragraph 360-40(1)(c) Assessable income To meet the requirement in paragraph 360-40(1)(c), the company and its 100% subsidiaries must have derived total assessable income of $200,000 or less in the income year before the current year. Paragraph 360-40(1)(d) Stock exchange listing To meet the requirement in paragraph 360-40(1)(d), the company must not be listed on any stock exchange in Australia or a foreign country. Paragraph 360-40(1)(e) Innovation tests If the company satisfies the early stage test, the company must also satisfy one of two Innovation Tests: the objective 100 point test or the principles-based test. 100 point test To satisfy the 100 point test, the company must obtain at least 100 points by meeting the innovation criteria in the table within section 360-45 of the ITAA 1997. The criteria are tested at a time immediately after the relevant shares are issued. If a company satisfies this test, it does not need to satisfy the principles-based test. Principles-based test To satisfy the principles-based test, the company must meet five requirements in paragraph 360-40(1)(e). This is tested at a time immediately after the relevant new shares are issued to the investor. The company can demonstrate that it meets each requirement through existing documentation such as a business plan, commercialisation strategy, competition analysis or other company documents. The company must be able to show that tangible steps have been or will be taken in relation to each of the requirements. The five requirements of the principles-based test, as outlined in paragraph 360-40(1)(e) of the ITAA 1997 are: • the company must be genuinely focused on developing one or more new or significantly improved innovations for commercialisation, • the business relating to that innovation must have high growth potential, • the company must demonstrate that it has the potential to be able to successfully scale up the business relating to the innovation, • the company must demonstrate that it has the potential to be able to address a broader than local market, including global markets, through that business, and • the company must demonstrate that it has the potential to be able to have competitive advantages for that business. Developing new or significantly improved innovations for commercialisation For the purposes of Subdivision 360-A, the Explanatory Memorandum to the Tax Laws Amendment (Tax Incentives for Innovation) Bill 2016 (EM) provides the following at paragraph 1.76 in relation to the definition of innovation: "Implicit in the definition of innovation is the requirement that the company is developing a new or significantly improved type of innovation such as a product, process, service, marketing or organisational method. This list of various types of innovations provides flexibility for innovation companies and is adaptable to current and future innovations. The Oslo Manual, published by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) provides a description of these different types of innovations..." The innovation being developed by the company must either be new or significantly improved for an applicable addressable market. The company's addressable market is the revenue opportunity or market demand arising from the innovation or the related business. The addressable market must be objective and realistic. Improvements must be significant in nature to meet this requirement. Significant is defined in the online Macquarie Dictionary as "important; of consequence." Customising existing products or minor changes resulting from software updates, pricing strategies or seasonal changes are examples of improvements that would not be considered significant. The OECD Oslo Manual, in relation to defining innovative services, states at paragraph 161 that "innovations in services can include significant improvements in how they are provided (for example, in terms of their efficiency or speed), the addition of new functions or characteristics to existing services, or the introduction of entirely new services." The company must be genuinely focussed on developing the innovation for a commercial purpose in order to generate economic value and revenue for the company. This requirement draws the distinction between simply having an idea and commercialising an idea. For a company to qualify as an ESIC under the 'Principles-based Test', the company must be "genuinely focussed on developing for commercialisation" their innovation. That is, the central activities of the company must be truly concentrated on developing their innovation for a commercial purpose. 'Commercialisation' includes a range of activities that involve the implementation or sale of a new or significantly improved innovation that will directly lead to the generation of economic value for the company. High growth potential The company must be able to demonstrate that the business relating to the innovation has a high growth potential within a broad addressable market. This refers to the company's ability to rapidly expand its business. Companies that are limited to supplying local customers will not meet this requirement. Scalability The company must be able to demonstrate that it has the potential to successfully scale up the business relating to the innovation. The company must have operating leverage, whereby it increases its market share or enters into new markets, its existing revenues can be multiplied with a reduced or minimal increase in operating costs. Broader than local market The company must be able to demonstrate that it has the potential to address a market that is broader than a local city, area or region. The company does not need to have a serviceable market at a national, multinational or global scale at the test time. However, it does need to show that the business is capable of addressing a market that is broader than a local market and that the business can be adapted to a broader scale in the future. Competitive advantages The company must be able to demonstrate that it has the potential to have competitive advantages, such as a cost or differential advantage over its competitors which are sustainable for the business as it expands. The company can analyse what competitors in the market offer and consider whether the company has a differentiating advantage that would allow it to outperform these competitors. | Detailed Reasoning - Test time: For the purposes of this ruling, the test time for determining if Company A is a qualifying ESIC will be upon the issue of qualifying shares on a particular day or dates on or after XX January 20XX and on or before 30 June 20XX. | Detailed Reasoning - Current year: For the purposes of subsection 360-40(1), the current year will be the year ending 30 June 20XX. For clarity, in relation to particular requirements within subsection 360-40(1), the last three income years will include the income years ending 30 June 20XX, 20XX and 20XX. | Detailed Reasoning - Early stage test: Paragraph 360-40(1)(a) Incorporation or registration Company A was incorporated during the income year ended 30 June 20XX., which is within the last three income years. Therefore, subparagraph 360-40(1)(a)(i) is satisfied. Company A was registered in the ABR during the income year ended 30 June 20XX., which is within the 3 income years outlined above, therefore the requirements of subparagraph 360-40(1)(a)(iii) are also satisfied. Paragraph 360-40(1)(b) Total expenses In applying the requirements of paragraph 360-40(1)(b), Company A and any of its 100% subsidiaries must have incurred total expenses of $1 million or less in the 20XX income year which is the income year before the current year. Company A had not been incorporated in the 20XX income year and Company B did not incur any expenses in the 20XX income year. Therefore, paragraph 360-40(1)(b) is satisfied. Paragraph 360-40(1)(c) Assessable income In applying the requirements of paragraph 360-40(1)(c), Company A and any of its 100% subsidiaries must have derived total assessable income of $200,000 or less in the income year before the current year. Company A had not been incorporated in the 20XX income year and Company B did not earn any assessable income in the 20XX income year. Therefore, paragraph 360-40(1)(c) is satisfied. Paragraph 360-40(1)(d) Stock exchange listing In applying the requirements of paragraph 360-40(1)(d), Company A must not be listed on any stock exchange in Australia or a foreign country at the test time. Company A is not listed on any stock exchange in Australia or a foreign country at the test time, therefore paragraph 360-40(1)(d) is satisfied. Conclusion on Early Stage Test Company A satisfies the Early Stage Test for the 20XX income year as each of the requirements within paragraphs 360-40(1)(a) to (d) have been satisfied. | Detailed Reasoning - 100 point test: Company A has not sought to satisfy the 100 point test but rather is electing to seek eligibility by satisfying the principles-based innovation test under paragraph 360-40(1)(e). | Detailed Reasoning - Principles-based test: Developing new or significantly improved innovations for commercialisation In applying the requirements of subparagraph 360-40(1)(e)(i), Company A must be developing an innovation which is either new or significantly improved for an applicable market. Company A has shown its product is new or significantly improves what is currently in the marketplace. Company A is genuinely focused on developing its product for commercialisation. Therefore, subparagraph 360-40(1)(e)(i) is satisfied. High growth potential Company A has demonstrated that it has high growth potential with its product because there is a realistic opportunity for its product to be supplied to industries and markets beyond its initial target market. Therefore, subparagraph 360-40(1)(e)(ii) is satisfied. Scalability Company A has demonstrated that it has the potential to scale up its business. Therefore, subparagraph 360-40(1)(e)(iii) is satisfied. Broader than local market Company A has demonstrated the potential that it can operate in an overseas market. Therefore, subparagraph 360-40(1)(e)(iv) is satisfied. Competitive advantages Company A has demonstrated that it has the potential to be able to have competitive advantages for its business. Therefore, subparagraph 360-40(1)(e)(v) is satisfied. Conclusion on principles-based test Company A satisfies the principles-based test as it has satisfied the requirements within subparagraphs 360-40(1)(e)(i) to (v) for the period 1 July 20XX to 30 June 20XX. | Detailed Reasoning - Conclusion: Company A meets the eligibility criteria of an ESIC under section 360-40 of the ITAA 1997 for the period 1 July 20XX to 30 June 20XX.