Private ruling: Military Superannuation - Election
Date of advice: 22 February 2017
Published: August 2017
Ruling period: Income year ending 30 June 2018 | Income year ending 30 June 2017 | Income year ended 30 June 2016 | Income year ended 30 June 2015
Date scheme commenced: 1 July 2014

Ruling: Q1: Does an invalidity pension paid under the rules of the Military Superannuation and Benefits Scheme (MSBS) established by trust deed under the Military Superannuation and Benefits Act 1991 (MSBA) constitute a superannuation income stream as that term is defined in section 307-70 of the ITAA 1997 and regulation 995-1.01(1) of the Income Tax Assessment Regulations 1997 (ITAR)? | A1: Yes. | Q2: If yes to the previous question, can you make the election in regulation 995-1.03 of the ITAR, before a particular payment of the invalidity pension is made, that the payment is not to be treated as a superannuation income stream benefit? | A2: Yes | Q3: If yes to the previous question, is the formula in section 307-145 of the ITAA 1997 applicable to the superannuation lump sum benefit if it is also considered a disability superannuation benefit? | A3: Yes.

Relevant facts and circumstances: This ruling is based on the facts stated in the description of the scheme that is set out below. If your circumstances are materially different from these facts, this ruling has no effect and you cannot rely on it. The fact sheet has more information about relying on your private ruling. As a member of the Australian Defence Force (ADF), you became a member of the MSBS. The MSBS is a scheme which was established to provide benefits that are payable when an individual retires from the ADF. Amongst other things, the MSBS Rules provide for the payment of an invalidity pension to certain individuals who have been retired because of their invalidity. To determine whether an invalidity pension is payable, the MSBS Rules provide for a mechanism by which a determination is made of a particular individual's capacity/incapacity to engage in civil employment after their retirement from the ADF: rule 22 MSBS Rules. Under that rule, an individual is assessed as having a Class A, Class B or Class C incapacity for civil employment. The MSBS Rules provide that a person whose incapacity for civil employment is classified as Class A is eligible for an invalidity pension, the starting amount for which is worked out having regard to an amount called the employer benefit: rule 27 MSBS Rules. A person whose incapacity for civil employment is classified as Class B is entitled to a pension of a different amount, which in very broad terms, may be half of the amount payable to a Class A recipient: rule 28 MSBS Rules. However, no invalidity pension is payable to a person whose incapacity for civil employment is classified as Class C: rule 31 MSBS Rules. In very simple terms, the 'employer benefit' is worked out having regard to your final average salary and your eligible service period. Schedule 8 to the MSBS Rules sets out the rules for the calculation of the employer benefit for some members, including a person who is retired from the ADF because of invalidity. Schedule 5 to the MSBS Rules sets out the rules used to calculate the rate of pension that is payable by conversion from the amount of the employer benefit. The MSBS Rules require an individual to undergo periodical reviews of their level of incapacity for civil employment: rule 25 MSBS Rules. The MSBS Rules generally provide that if an individual's level of incapacity for civil employment is adjusted to the extent that they are reclassified to another classification, the amount payable may be adjusted. If an individual is reclassified to Class C, the invalidity pension that had been payable to them (as either a Class A or Class B individual) is cancelled and the individual will have a preserved benefit of the amount of their employer benefit: rule 29 MSBS Rules. However, an individual who has reached the age of 55, cannot be reclassified to Class C incapacity for civil employment: subrule 23(2) MSBS Rules. Upon becoming entitled to receive an invalidity pension under the MSBS, an amount equal to the funded employer benefit is paid by the Commonwealth Superannuation Scheme (CSC) to the Commonwealth and the invalidity pension is payable to the individual by the Commonwealth from the Consolidated Revenue Fund: section 13 MSBA. If an invalidity pension that was payable to an individual who was classified as having a Class A or Class B incapacity for civil employment is cancelled because the individual is reclassified to Class C, the Commonwealth must pay to the CSC an amount equal to the individual's funded employer benefit: section 15 MSBA. The CSC is currently withholding amounts from your invalidity pension on the basis that each fortnightly payment of the pension is a superannuation income stream benefit that you are liable to include in your assessable income. In your application for this private ruling you have contended that: n The invalidity payments is subject to regular medical reviews which can result in a higher or lower payment or a cancellation of the benefit all together. This means the payment is variable outside the terms and guidelines as stated in regulation 995-1.03 of the ITAR. This means the recipient is able to elect to have the invalidity benefit taxed as a lump sum and not treated as a “superannuation income stream benefit”. n You believe you can make the election as per regulation 995-1.03 as your payment is variable outside the terms as set out and n You believe that in making this election, the applicable formula to use is contained at section 307-145 of the ITAA 1997 provided that you supply two doctors' reports as per the definition of “disability superannuation benefits.”

Relevant legislative provisions: Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 section 307-70 | Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 section 307-145 | Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 subdivision 307-B | Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 subsection 995-1(1) | Income Tax Assessment Regulations 1997 subregulation 995-1.01(1) | Income Tax Assessment Regulations 1997 subregulation 995-1.01(2) | Income Tax Assessment Regulations 1997 regulation 995-1.03 | Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 section 10 | Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Regulations 1994 subregulation 1.06(1)

Reasons for decision: Detailed Reasoning - Detailed reasoning: Superannuation benefits are either superannuation income stream benefits or superannuation lump sums (Subdivision 307-B of the ITAA 1997). A superannuation income stream benefit is relevantly 'a payment from an interest that supports a superannuation income stream, other than a payment to which regulation 995-1.03 of the ITAR applies: subsection 307-70(1) and (2) of the ITAA 1997 and subregulation 995-1.01(2) of the ITAR. A definition of “superannuation income stream” is set out in subregulation 995-1.01(1) of the ITAR. On the issue of whether these MSBS pensions are superannuation income streams, an 'income stream' is a superannuation income stream if it is taken to be a pension for the purposes of the SIS Act in accordance with subregulation 1.06(1) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Regulations 1994 (SISR). The expression 'income stream' is not defined by either the income tax or superannuation laws. It must be given its ordinary meaning. We consider that an income stream is a series of periodic payments that relate to each other and that are payable over an identifiable period of time. The invalidity pension payable under the MSBS amounts to such a series of fortnightly payments. Having examined the terms under which the invalidity pension is payable under the MSBA and MSBS, we are satisfied that the invalidity pension is a pension that meets the requirements set out in subregulation 1.06(1) of the SISR. | Detailed Reasoning - Question 2: If yes to the previous question, can you make the election in regulation 995-1.03 of the ITAR, before a particular payment of the invalidity pension is made, that the payment is not to be treated as a superannuation income stream benefit? | Detailed Reasoning - Answer 2: Yes | Detailed Reasoning - Detailed reasoning: Regulation 995-1.03 of the ITAR effectively allows a person in receipt of a superannuation income stream to elect to have a payment made from the income stream be treated as a superannuation lump sum instead of a superannuation income stream benefit (provided the person makes the election before the payment is made). However, an election under regulation 995-1.03 of the ITAR may only be made if the conditions to which the superannuation income stream is subject permit the amount of payments in a year to vary other than in the circumstances set out in sub-paragraphs (a)(i)-(iv). Effectively this means that an election can only be made if the payment amount in a year is capable of being varied other than by way of: indexation under the pension rules; the application of the family law splitting rules; the commutation of the income stream; or the payment of an assessment of excess contributions tax. Rule 23 permits a person who has been classified under Rule 22 to be reclassified under Rule 22 at a future time. For example, a retiree who was classified as Class A under Rule 22 may, where the requirements of Rule 23 are met, be reclassified as Class B or Class C at some later time (and vice versa). In the case of a person in receipt of an MSBS invalidity pension who is reclassified Class A or Class B, this effectively means the annual payment amount of their pension will change significantly given the annual amount of a Class B invalidity pension may in general terms equate to only half the annual amount payable as a Class A invalidity pension. We consider that in the circumstance where the annual amount of payments from an MSBS invalidity pension is altered in response to the application of Rule 23, this reflects a circumstance other than one set out in sub-paragraphs 995-1.03(a)(i)-(iv). Accordingly a person in receipt of an MSBS invalidity pension may make an election under regulation 995-1.03 of the ITAR in respect of a payment provided they make the election before the payment from their pension is made. This election needs to be made to the superannuation fund that is making the superannuation payments, in your case the CSC. | Detailed Reasoning - Question 3: If yes to the previous question, is the formula in section 307-145 of the ITAA 1997 applicable to the superannuation lump sum benefit if it is also considered a disability superannuation benefit? | Detailed Reasoning - Answer 3: Yes. | Detailed Reasoning - Detailed reasoning: A superannuation benefit that is also a 'disability superannuation benefit' as defined in subsection 995-1(1) of the ITAA 1997 will typically be taxed less than an ordinary superannuation benefit. A disability superannuation benefit is defined under subsection 995-1(1) of the ITAA 1997 as follows: disability superannuation benefit means a superannuation benefit if: (a) the benefit is paid to a person because he or she suffers from ill-health (whether physical or mental); and (b) 2 legally qualified medical practitioners have certified that, because of the ill-health, it is unlikely that the person can ever be gainfully employed in a capacity for which he or she is reasonably qualified because of education, experience or training. | Detailed Reasoning - Tax treatment of the invalidity pension payments that are superannuation lump sums: Where you provide your fund, in this case the CSC, with an election, under regulation 995-1.03 of the ITAR before a particular pension payment is received, it will be treated as a superannuation lump sum benefit. If the superannuation lump sum benefit also satisfies the definition of a disability superannuation benefit, section 307-145 of the ITAA 1997 will apply to effectively increase the tax-free component of the lump sum in accordance with the following formula: | Detailed Reasoning - Amount of benefit × Days to retirement ÷ Service days + Days to retirement: The formula takes into account the length of your service and the days until you would normally have been expected to retire. If you have the relevant documentary evidence from 2 legally qualified medical practitioners, you should provide it to your fund so they can apply the formula to any superannuation lump sum benefits you receive.

Periods not covered by this private ruling: Income year ended 30 June 2014 | Income year ended 30 June 2013 | Income year ended 30 June 2012 | Income year ended 30 June 2011 | Under certain circumstances, the Commissioner may decline to make a private ruling. In this case, the Commissioner declines to make a private ruling in relation to the periods outlined above. This decision was made in accordance with paragraph 359-35(2)(a) of Schedule 1 of the Taxation Administration Act 1953 , which states that: | (2) The Commissioner may decline to make a private ruling if: | (a) The Commissioner considers that the ruling would prejudice or unduly restrict the administration of taxation law… | In addition, paragraph 39 of Taxation Ruling TR 2006/11 Private Rulings provides that the Commissioner may decline to rule where: | the provision of a private ruling would not have any practical consequences for you (such as where a Product Ruling already applies to you, or where the transaction has already occurred in an income year for which the amendment period has expired) | Question 1: Does an invalidity pension paid under the rules of the MSBS established by trust deed under the MSBA constitute a superannuation income stream as that term is defined in section 307-70 of the ITAA 1997 and regulation 995-1.01(1) of the ITAR?