Private ruling: residency of self-managed superannuation fund
Date of advice: 18 July 2017
Published: November 2017
Ruling period: Year ending 30 June 2019
Date scheme commenced: 1 July 2018

Ruling: Q1: Will the self-managed superannuation fund be an Australian superannuation fund for the purposes of subsection 295-95(2) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997) if one member moves overseas? | A1: Yes.

Relevant facts and circumstances: The Fund is a self-managed superannuation fund (SMSF). The Fund was established in Australia in 2011. The Fund has a corporate trustee. The three members of the Fund are directors of the corporate trustee. Member 1 is the son of Member 2 and Member 3. The Fund’s assets include: ● rental properties; ● cash; ● managed funds; and ● shares In the 2018-19 income year, Member 3 will be departing Australia permanently to reside overseas. Before Member 3 leaves Australia, an enduring power of attorney will be signed in favour of Member 2 (the legal personal representative). Member 3 will cease to be a director of the corporate trustee. Member 1 and Member 2 (the director trustees) reside in Australia. The director trustees will perform the high level duties and activities of the Fund independently and without influence from Member 3. Member 1 is the only contributor to the Fund and the only 'active member’. Member 2 and 3 will not contribute to the Fund.

Relevant legislative provisions: Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 295-95 | Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Subsection 295-95(2) | Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Paragraph 295-95(2)(a) | Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Paragraph 295-95(2)(b) | Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Paragraph 295-95(2)(c) | Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Subsection 295-95(3) | Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 Subparagraph 17A(3)(b)(ii) | Explanatory Memorandum to the Tax laws Amendment (Simplified Superannuation) Act 2007 All references are to the ITAA 1997 unless otherwise indicated.

Reasons for decision: Summary: The Fund satisfies all the tests set out in subsection 295-95(2) of the ITAA 1997 and is therefore an Australian superannuation fund for income tax purposes for the relevant income year. | Detailed Reasoning - Australian superannuation fund: In accordance with subsection 295-95(2) of the ITAA 1997, a superannuation fund is an Australian superannuation fund at a time and for an income year in which that time occurs if: (a) the fund was established in Australia, or any asset of the fund is situated in Australia at that time; and (b) at that time, the central management and control of the fund is ordinarily in Australia; and (c) at that time either the fund had no member covered by subsection (3) (an active member ) or at least 50% of: (i) the total market value of the fund’s assets attributable to superannuation interests held by active members; or (ii) the sum of the amounts that would be payable to or in respect of active members if they voluntarily ceased to be members; is attributable to superannuation interests held by active members who are Australian residents. Subject to the Fund meeting all of the above three tests during the relevant period, the Fund will be an Australian superannuation fund. If a fund fails to satisfy any one of the tests at a particular time, it will not be an Australian superannuation fund at that time, even if it satisfies the other two conditions. The Commissioner has issued Taxation Ruling TR 2008/9 entitled Income tax: meaning of 'Australian superannuation fund’ in subsection 295-95(2) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (TR 2008/9). The ruling represents the Commissioner’s interpretation of the definition of 'Australian superannuation fund’. In particular, it provides guidance on the meaning of central management and control (CM&C) and active member. | Detailed Reasoning - Test One: The fund is established in Australia or any asset of the fund is situated in Australia: The first test that must be satisfied is that either the fund was established in Australia, or any asset of the fund is situated in Australia at the relevant time. This is a question of fact. In this case, the Fund was established in Australia and therefore satisfies the requirement in paragraph 295-95(2)(a) of the ITAA 1997. | Detailed Reasoning - Test Two: The CM&C of the fund is 'ordinarily’ in Australia: The second test, that a superannuation fund must satisfy to be an 'Australian superannuation fund’ at a particular time, is that the CM&C of the fund is 'ordinarily’ in Australia. Generally, the location of where important decisions are made is the location of the relevant management and control. The concept of CM&C is not defined in the ITAA 1997 or in the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (ITAA 1936). In addition, the Explanatory Memorandum to the Tax Laws Amendment (Simplified Superannuation) Act 2007 (which inserted section 295-95 of the ITAA 1997) does not provide any guidance as to its meaning. Therefore, it must be given its ordinary or common law meaning. The policy intention of the amendment was to simplify the scope of the superannuation fund residency definition and give effect to a minor policy change in respect of the application of the CM&C test. The concept of CM&C was developed by the courts as a common law rule for determining the residence of a company. To determine the location of the CM&C of a fund at a point in time, it is necessary to consider what constitutes the CM&C of a fund and who it is that exercises the CM&C of a fund. Paragraph 20 of TR 2008/9 states that the CM&C of a superannuation fund involves the focus on the who, when and where of the strategic and high level decision making processes and activities of the fund. In the context of the operations of a superannuation fund, the strategic and high level decision making processes includes the performance of the following duties and activities: ● formulating the investment strategy for the fund; ● reviewing and updating or varying the fund’s investment strategy as well as monitoring and reviewing the performance of the fund’s investments; ● if the fund has reserves - the formulation of a strategy for their prudential management; and ● determining how the assets of the fund are to be used to fund member benefits. Establishing who is exercising the CM&C of the fund is a question of fact to be determined with reference to the circumstances of each case. While it is the trustee of the fund which has the legal responsibility, or duty to exercise the CM&C of a superannuation fund, the mere duty to exercise CM&C does not, of itself, constitute CM&C. If the trustee in fact performs the high level duties and activities of the fund, they will be exercising the CM&C of the fund in practice. In discussing CM&C, TR 2008/9 states at paragraph 26: The trustee of the fund may seek external advice relating to the performance of their high level duties and activities. Provided that the trustee makes the actual high level decisions for the fund, the circumstance that the trustee acts on such advice does not affect the fact that the trustee is exercising the CM&C of the fund. Based on the facts of this case, Member 1 and Member 2 (the director trustees) will perform the high level and strategic decisions independently and without influence from Member 3. Therefore it is considered that the director trustees of the Fund will exercise the CM&C of the Fund. | Detailed Reasoning - Location of the CM&C: The location of the CM&C of the fund is determined by where the high level and strategic decisions of the fund are made and high level duties and activities are in fact performed. In this case, the high level and strategic decisions relating to the Fund will be independently performed by the director trustees only. As both director trustees reside and will continue to reside in Australia during Member 3’s absence, the CM&C remains in Australia. The requirement in paragraph 295-95(2)(b) will therefore be satisfied. A superannuation fund does not fail to satisfy the definition of a SMSF where a legal personal representative is a trustee of the fund, in place of a member of the fund and has an enduring power of attorney in place of the member of the fund [paragraph 17A(3)(b) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 ] . It is important to note that the requirement in paragraph 295-95(2)(b) will be satisfied, as explained above, provided certain requirements have also been met in the process of appointing a legal personal representative as a trustee in place of a member of the Fund. Paragraph 6 of SMSFR 2010/2 Self Managed Superannuation Funds: the scope and operation of subparagraph 17A(3)(b)(ii) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SMSFR 2010/2), provides that a person who holds an enduring power of attorney qualifies as a legal personal representative. Paragraphs 8, 44 and 45 of SMSFR 2010/2 provide that the following requirements must be met in the process of appointing a legal personal representative as a trustee in place of the member of a fund: ● the appointment of the legal personal representative as trustee and the removal of the members as trustees must be in accordance with the trust deed, the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 ( SISA) and any other relevant legislation; ● the legal personal representative consents in writing to the appointment as trustee of the fund and signs a declaration stating that they understand their duties as a trustee no later than 21 days after their appointment as trustee. Paragraph 11 of SMSFR 2010/2 explains that the legal personal representative must also perform their duties as a trustee of the SMSF pursuant to their appointment to that position. Further, paragraph 17 of SMSFR 2010/2 also provides that a member can execute an enduring power of attorney in respect of an existing member who is a director of the corporate trustee in their own right. In this case, provided Member 3 executes a valid enduring power of attorney in favour of Member 2, Member 2 will be a legal personal representative for the purposes of subparagraph 17A(3)(b)(ii) of the SISA. Furthermore, provided the appointment of the legal personal representative and the removal of Member 3 as a director of the corporate trustee was in accordance with the requirements discussed above, as outlined in SMSFR 2010/2, the Fund will continue to meet the definition of an SMSF. | Detailed Reasoning - Test Three: The 'active member’ test: The third test that must be satisfied for a fund to be an Australian superannuation fund at a particular time is the 'active member test’. In accordance with paragraph 295-95(2)(c), the active member test is satisfied if, at the relevant time: ● the fund has no 'active’ member; or ● at least 50% of the total market value of the fund’s assets attributable to superannuation interests held by active members is attributable to superannuation interests held by active members who are Australian residents; or ● at least 50% of the sum of the amounts that would be payable to, or in respect of active members if they voluntarily ceased to be members, is attributable to superannuation interests held by active members who are Australian residents. As defined in subsection 295-95(3) of the ITAA 1997, a member is an active member at a particular time if the member is: (a) a contributor to the fund at that time; or (b) an individual on whose behalf contributions have been made, other than an individual: (i) who is a foreign resident; and (ii) who is not a contributor at that time; and (iii) for whom contributions made to the fund on the individual’s behalf after the individual became a foreign resident are only payments in respect of a time when the individual was an Australian resident. The term 'contributor’ in the definition of active member is not defined. Therefore, it is to be given its ordinary meaning subject to the context in which it appears. The concept of a 'contributor’ within the context of the active member test is directed at establishing the status of a member as a contributor at a particular point in time, not on the specific act of contributing. If a member is a contributor at a particular time, they will be an active member, irrespective of whether the member is an Australian resident or foreign resident. [Refer: paragraphs 185 and 189 of TR 2008/9]. In this case, Member 1 is the only contributor to the Fund, and thus the only 'active’ member. As Member 1 is an Australian resident, the Fund will satisfy the active member test for the purposes of paragraph 295-95(2)(c) of the ITAA 1997.