Private ruling: Residency for tax purposes
Published: April 2012

Ruling: Were you a resident of Australia for the period you were in Australia? | Yes. | Year ended 30 June 2012

Relevant facts and circumstances: You maintained your home overseas while you were in Australia. Your neighbours and friends collected your mail and kept an eye on your home while you were away. You did not acquire any assets while you were in Australia.

Relevant legislative provisions: Income tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 6-5 | Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Subsection 995-1(1).

Reasons for decision: Summary: Subsection 995-1(1) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997) defines an Australian resident as a person who is a resident of Australia for the purpose of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (ITAA 1936). The terms resident and resident of Australia, in regard to an individual, are defined in subsection 6(1) of the ITAA 1936. The definition provides four tests to ascertain whether a taxpayer is a resident of Australia for income tax purposes. These tests are: 1. the resides test 2. the domicile test 3. the 183 day test 4. the superannuation test The primary test for deciding the residency status of an individual is whether the individual resides in Australia according to the ordinary meaning of the word. However, where an individual does not reside in Australia according to ordinary concepts, they may still be considered to be an Australian resident for tax purposes if they satisfy the conditions of one of the three other tests. | Detailed Reasoning - The resides test: The ordinary meaning of the word 'reside', according to the Macquarie Dictionary, 2001, rev. 3rd edition, The Macquarie Library Pty Ltd, NSW, is 'to dwell permanently or for a considerable time; having one's abode for a time', and according to the Compact Edition of the Oxford English Dictionary (1987), is 'to dwell permanently, or for a considerable time, to have one's settled or usual abode, to live in or at a particular place'. When an individual arrives in Australia not intending to reside here permanently all the facts about his or hers presence must be considered in determining residency status. The period of physical presence or length of time In Australia is not by its self decisive when determining whether an individual resides here period. An individual's behaviour over the time spent in Australia may reflect a degree of continuity, routine or habit that is consistent with residing here. Whether a considerable time has elapsed to demonstrate that the individual's behaviour has the required continuity, routine or habit is a question of fact; that is, it depends on the circumstances of each case. The Commissioner's view of the law is that six months is a considerable time when deciding whether the individual's behaviour is consistent with residing here. In your case you came to Australia with your husband for the duration of his 9 month work contract. You obtained employment on a short term contract while you were in Australia. You lived in a hotel with your husband and then in a fully furnished apartment for the remainder of your stay in Australia. The Commissioner is satisfied that your behaviour while in Australia is consistent with that of someone residing in Australia according to ordinary concepts. You are a resident under this test. As you meet the resides test it is not necessary to look at the domicile, 183 and superannuation tests. | Detailed Reasoning - Your residency status: You were a resident of Australia for taxation purposes for the duration of your stay in Australia.

Please check this edited version to be sure that there are no details remaining that you think may allow you to be identified. If you have any concerns about this ruling you wish to discuss, you will find our contact details in the fact sheet.