Private ruling: CGT on main residence
Date of advice: 6 August 2021
Published: November 2021
Ruling period: Year ended 30 June 2015 | Year ended 30 June 2016 | Year ended 30 June 2017 | Year ended 30 June 2018 | Year ended 30 June 2019 | Year ended 30 June 2020 | Year ended 30 June 2021
Date scheme commenced: 5 August 2014

Ruling: Q1: Does the Taxpayer qualify for the "CGT" full main residence exemption in relation to the Property for the entire period of ownership? | A1: Yes

Relevant facts and circumstances: You and your former spouse purchased "the Property" as joint tenants for $X,XXX,XXX on XX You resided in the Property from the date of purchase. You and your spouse separated on XX You both continued to reside in the Property until on or about XX. On the XX, the Family Court of Australia ordered the transfer of right, title, and interest in the property to you at the agreed market value of $X,XXX,XXX. Settlement of the Property was finalised on XX, changing from joint tenants to yourself as the sole owner. The property was leased to unrelated tenants from XX. The original lease was from the you and your spouse and subsequently altered to the just yourself once title was transferred. You sold the Property on XX (settlement date) with the lease to tenants still in force. The property was sold for $X,XXX,XXX. You did not purchase another property or treat it as your principal place of residence between vacating the property XX and the settlement date of XX.

Relevant legislative provisions: Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 section 6 - 10 | Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 section 102 - 20 | Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 section 104 - 10 | Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 section 108 - 5 | Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 section 118 - 110 | Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 section 118 - 145 | Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 section 118 - 190 | Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 subdivision 126 - A | Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 section 126 - 5

Reasons for decision: Detailed Reasoning - Capital gains tax: Under section 6-10 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997), assessable income also includes statutory income. Capital gains are included as assessable income under section 102-5 of the ITAA 1997. Section 102-20 of the ITAA 1997 states that a capital gain or capital loss is made only if a CGT event happens to a CGT asset. The property is a CGT asset (section 108-5 of the ITAA 1997). The most common CGT event, CGT event A1, occurs when you dispose of your ownership interest in a CGT asset to another entity. The capital gain or capital loss is made at the time of the event (section 104-10 of the ITAA 1997). | Detailed Reasoning - Main residence exemption: Generally, an individual can disregard a capital gain or loss from a CGT event that happens to their ownership interest in a dwelling that is their main residence. Land adjacent to a dwelling is also exempt, to the extent that the land was used primarily for private or domestic purposes in association with the dwelling. The maximum area of adjacent land covered by the exemption is two hectares. To get the full exemption from CGT: • The residence must be your home for the whole period that you owned it (paragraph 118-110(1)(b) of the ITAA 1997). • You must not have used the dwelling to produce assessable income (unless the temporary absence rule in section 118-145 of the ITAA 1997 applies) (section 118-190 of the ITAA 1997). For the main residence exemption to apply for your whole ownership period, you must move into the dwelling as soon as practicable after you acquire the dwelling. | Detailed Reasoning - Absence rule: As a general rule, a dwelling is no longer your main residence once you stop living in it. However, under section 118-145 of the ITAA 1997 you may choose to have a dwelling treated as your main residence for CGT purposes even though you no longer live in it. This choice needs to be made only for the income year that the CGT event happens to the dwelling, for example the year that you enter into a contract to sell it. Under subsection 118-145(2) of the ITAA 1997, if you use the part of the dwelling that was your main residence for the purpose of producing assessable income, the maximum period that you can treat it as your main residence under this section while you use it for that purpose is 6 years. You are entitled to another maximum period of 6 years each time the dwelling again becomes and ceases to be your main residence. However, if you make this choice, you cannot treat any other dwelling as your main residence while you apply this section. In your case where you did not live in your main residence and used your property to produce assessable income for up to 6 years and satisfy the above requirements, you will still be entitled to the full main residence exemption when you sell your main residence. The 6 year period begins when you started to use your main residence for the purpose of producing assessable income on the XX XX XXXX. | Detailed Reasoning - Marriage breakdown and roll-over: CGT generally applies to all changes of ownership of assets on or after 20 September 19XX. However, subdivision 126-A of the ITAA 1997 outlines the circumstances where a capital gain may be disregarded following a marriage breakdown. If certain conditions are met there is an automatic roll-over of the capital gain for the transferring spouse if a CGT event happens as a result of a marriage breakdown. Subsection 126-5(1) of the ITAA 1997 provides that there is a roll over if a CGT event (the trigger event) happens involving an individual (the transferor) and his or her spouse or former spouse (the transferee) because of: (a) a court order under the Family Law Act 1975 (FLA) or under a state law, territory law or foreign law relating to breakdowns of relationships between spouses; or (b) a maintenance agreement approved by a court under section 87 of the FLA or a corresponding agreement approved by a court under a corresponding foreign law; or (d) something done under: • a financial agreement made under Part VIIIA of the FLA that is binding because of section 90G of that Act; or • a corresponding written agreement that is binding because of a corresponding foreign law; or • (da) something done under: • a Part VIIIAB financial agreement (within the meaning of the FLA 1975) that is binding because of section 90UJ of that Act; or • a corresponding written agreement that is binding because of a corresponding foreign law; or (e) something done under: • an award made in an arbitration referred to in section 13H of the FLA 1975; or • a corresponding award made in an arbitration under a corresponding State law, Territory law or foreign law; or (f) something done under a written agreement: • that is binding because of a State law, Territory law or foreign law relating to breakdowns of relationships between spouses; and • that, because of such a law, prevents a court making an order about matters to which the agreement applies, or that is inconsistent with the terms of the agreement in relation to those matters, unless the agreement is varied or set aside. If your case, the requirements of subsection 126-5(1) of the ITAA 1997 are met and the marriage or relationship breakdown rollover applies. When the property is transferred to you, you're taken to have acquired the property at your ex-spouse's cost base, at the time it was transferred to you. When you eventually dispose of the asset, a CGT event will occur. To determine if you are entitled to a main residence exemption on the sale of the property, you take into account the way in which each of you used the dwelling during your respective periods of ownership. In your circumstances and using the absence rule under section 118-145 of the ITAA 1997, the property was regarded as your main residence during his full ownership period. The transfer of your ex-spouse's portion of the property was done under the terms of the family court order and as consequently be treated as a rollover. The property was treated as an investment property for only X months, (less than 6 years) prior to the sale of the property, signifying the property would also be regarded as your main residence for your full period of ownership. Consequently, you would be entitled to a full exemption from CGT on your 100% ownership of the property when you dispose of the property, providing you do not treat any other dwelling as your main residence during your period of ownership of the property.

This ruling applies for the following periods: