Private ruling: Small business concessions
Date of advice: 2 August 2017
Published: November 2017
Ruling period: Year ended 30 June 2016
Date scheme commenced: 1 July 2015

Ruling: Q1: Will the Commissioner use his discretion to extend the replacement asset period pursuant to subsection 104-190(2) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997) in respect of the small business capital gains tax (CGT) replacement asset roll-over relief? | A1: Yes.

Relevant facts and circumstances: You sold a business. You have investigated several business however due to a number of circumstances you were unable to acquire a new business with the two years. You are still in negotiations to purchase a replacement asset.

Relevant legislative provisions: Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 subsection 104-190(2) | Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 subdivision 152-A

Reasons for decision: Summary: The small business roll-over allows you to defer the capital gain made from a CGT event if you acquire one or more replacement assets and satisfy certain conditions. The conditions which must be met to obtain relief are set out in Subdivision 152-A of the ITAA 1997. You can choose the roll-over even if you have not yet acquired a replacement asset. However CGT event J5 happens if, by the end of the replacement asset period, you do not acquire a suitable replacement asset which is an active asset. CGT event J6 happens if, by the end of the replacement asset period, the cost base (first, second and fourth elements only) of the replacement asset(s) you acquired is less than the capital gains disregarded under the roll-over provisions. The replacement asset period starts one year before, and ends two years after, the last CGT event in the income year for which you obtain the roll-over. Subsection 104-190(2) of the ITAA 1997 provides that the Commissioner may extend the replacement asset period. You have been investigating replacement businesses. However due to a number of reasons you were unable to acquire a suitable replacement business within the two year period. In determining if the discretion would be exercised the Commissioner has considered the following factors: ● evidence of an acceptable explanation for the period of the extension requested (and whether it would be fair and equitable in the circumstances to provide such an extension) ● prejudice to the Commissioner which may result from the additional time being allowed (but the mere absence of prejudice is not enough to justify the granting of an extension) ● unsettling of people, other than the Commissioner, or of established practices ● fairness to people in like positions and the wider public interest ● whether any mischief is involved, and ● consequences of the decision. Having considered the relevant facts, the Commissioner is able to apply his discretion under subsection 104-190(2) of the ITAA 1997 and allow an extension of time.