Private ruling: Residency
Date of advice: 13 October 2021
Published: January 2022
Ruling period: Year ending 30 June XXXX | Year ending 30 June XXXX
Date scheme commenced: 1 July 20XX

Ruling: Q1: Are you a resident for taxation purposes? | A1: No

Relevant facts and circumstances: Your tax agent advised that: • You own a residential rental property in Australia situated at XXXX. It is rented through a real estate agent, XXXXreal estate. The current tenant is leased for a further 12 months. • You do not own any vehicles in Australia but, own a car in XXXX and have an International driver's licence. • You left XXXX in XXXX, then worked in XXXX. • You spent 6 months unemployed living in XXXX. • You then worked in XXXX for 3 months until the covid pandemic began, at which time he travelled back to XXXX in July XXXX. • You married a XXXX citizen, and in XXXX you had a child who is a dual citizen of XXXX and XXXX. • You started a new job in XXXX in XXXX. • You were issued a residency visa for XXXX on XXXXand your residency application for XXXX was approved on XXXX. • You live in XXXX permanently and travel back and forth to XXXX for work. • You intend to live in XXXX for the foreseeable future with your family and have established ties to the community there. • You, your spouse, and child are leasing a property in XXXX at XXXX, and your employer provides accommodation for you in XXXX while you work there. • You have permanent employment, and your employer pays tax in his country of employment. • If your current employment ceases, you intend to remain in XXXX and find alternative work in XXXX. • You plan to live in XXXX for at least the next XXXX years and work in XXXX for the same amount of time • You and your spouse have joint bank accounts there. • You do not have any social or sporting connections in XXXXbut have built your new social and sporting connections in XXXX. • You have removed yourself from the XXXX electoral roll.

Relevant legislative provisions: Income Tax Assessment Act 1936, ss6(1) | Income Tax Assessment Act 1936, s6-5 | Income Tax Assessment Act 1997, s995-1 | Income Tax Assessment Act 1997, s 768-910 | International Tax Agreements Act 1953

Reasons for decision: Detailed Reasoning - Detailed reasoning: Section 995-1 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997) defines an Australian resident for taxation purposes as a person who is a resident of Australia for the purposes of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (ITAA 1936). Section 6-5 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997) provides that where you are a resident of Australia for taxation purposes, your assessable income includes income gained from all sources, whether in or out of Australia. However, where you are a foreign resident, your assessable income includes only income derived from an Australian source. The terms 'resident' and 'resident of Australia', regarding an individual, are defined in subsection 6(1) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (ITAA 1936). The definition provides four tests to ascertain whether a taxpayer is a resident of Australia for income tax purposes. These tests are: • the resides test, • the domicile test, • the 183-day test, and • the superannuation test. The primary test for deciding the residency status of an individual is whether the individual resides in Australia according to the ordinary meaning of the word resides. However, where an individual does not reside in Australia according to ordinary concepts, they may still be a resident of Australia for tax purposes if they meet the conditions of one of the other three tests. | Detailed Reasoning - Resides Test: The resides test considers whether an individual is residing in Australia according to the ordinary meaning of the word 'reside'. As the word 'reside' is not defined in Australian taxation law, it takes its ordinary meaning for the purposes of subsection 6(1) of the ITAA 1936. In considering the definition of 'reside', the High Court of Australia, in Federal Commissioner of Taxation v Miller (1946) 73 CLR 93 at page 99-100, per Latham CJ, noted the term 'reside' should be given a wide meaning for the purposes of section 6(1) of the ITAA 1936. Similarly, in Subrahmanyam v Commissioner of Taxation 2002 ATC 2303, Deputy President Forgie said at paragraphs 43 and 44 that the widest meaning should be attributed to the word 'reside'. The question of whether an individual 'resides' in a country is a question of fact and degree and not of law. In deciding this question, the courts have consistently referred to and considered the following factors as being relevant: • • physical presence • • intention or purpose • • family or business ties • • maintenance and location of assets • • social and living arrangements. In your case, you are still a citizen of XXXX, but you were issued a residency visa for XXXXand your residency application for XXXX. You have lived in XXXX with your spouse on permanent basis since your marriage. This subject is addressed in Taxation Ruling 98/17 (TR98/17 ) Income tax: residency status of individuals entering Australia. At paragraphs 20 and 21 it states - 20. All the facts and circumstances that describe an individual's behaviour in Australia are relevant. In particular, the following factors are useful in describing the quality and character of an individual's behaviour: • • intention or purpose of presence; • • family and business/employment ties; • • maintenance and location of assets; and • • social and living arrangements. 21. No single factor is necessarily decisive, and many are interrelated. The weight given to each factor varies depending on individual circumstances. Your intention is to remain on a long-term residency in XXXX and work in XXXX as you are now married to a XXXX citizen. You have also satisfied the following conditions: • you and your spouse maintain a rental property in XXXX where you stay together. You do not have any personal belongings in XXXX, except for your rental property which is managed by a real estate. You also work in XXXX and live in an accommodation provided by your employer. • you have established an abode in XXXX where you stay in rental accommodation with your spouse and child. • you have established professional and social connections in XXXXwith various friends and social organisations. • you are considered a non-resident for tax purposes under the resides test because: ­ you do not maintain an enduring association with XXXX ­ you maintain strong family ties with your spouse and child in XXXX ­ you have XXXX bank accounts ­ you purchased a car and taken out insurances in XXXX ­ you have social living arrangements with various organisations in XXXX and XXXX ­ you have a residential property in XXXX Your circumstances taken together lead to a conclusion that you are a non-resident under this test for the 2019 tax year and thereafter. This may change if you decide to return to Australia and meet the residency test for tax purposes. | Detailed Reasoning - The Domicile Test: Under the domicile test, a person is a resident of Australia if their domicile is in Australia unless the Commissioner is satisfied, they have a permanent place of abode outside of Australia. | Detailed Reasoning - Domicile: "Domicile" is a legal concept to be determined according to the Domicile Act 1982 and common law rules. A person's domicile is in their country of origin unless they acquire a different domicile of choice or operation of law. To obtain a different domicile of choice, a person must have the intention to make their home indefinitely in another country, usually done by obtaining a migration visa. The domicile of choice which a person has at any time continues until that person acquires a different domicile of choice. As you are a citizen of XXXX therefore, your domicile of origin will be XXXX. Your intention is to continue to work and reside on a permanent basis in XXXX with your spouse. | Detailed Reasoning - Permanent place of abode: A person's 'permanent place of abode' is a question of fact to be determined in the light of all the circumstances of each case. ( Applegate v. Federal Commissioner of Taxation 78 ATC 4051; 8 ATR 372 ( Applegate )) In Applegate , the court found that 'permanent' does not mean everlasting or forever, but it is to be contrasted with temporary or transitory. The courts have considered 'place of abode' to refer to a person's residence, where he lives with his family and sleeps at night. Taxation Ruling IT 2650 Income Tax : Residency - Permanent place of abode outside Australia (IT 2650) provides a number of factors which are used by the Commissioner in reaching a satisfaction as to an individual's permanent place of abode. These factors include: (a) the intended and actual length of the individual's stay in the overseas country; (b) any intention either to return to Australia at some definite point in time or to travel to another country; (c) the intended and actual length of the individual's stay in the overseas country; (d) any intention either to return to Australia at some definite point in time or to travel to another country; (e) the establishment of a home outside Australia; (f) the abandonment of any residence or place of abode the individual may have had in Australia; (g) the duration and continuity of the individual's presence in the overseas country; and (h) the durability of association that the individual has with a particular place in Australia, i.e. maintaining bank accounts in Australia, informing government departments, place of education of the taxpayer's children, family ties. Paragraph 24 of IT 2650 states that the weight to be given to each factor will vary with individual circumstances of each case and no single factor is conclusive. Greater weight should be given to factors (c), (e) and (f) than to the remaining factors. In your case it is considered that you have established a permanent place of abode in Chile as: • you lease and live in a rental property in XXXX with your spouse, and it remains available to you • you have XXXX bank accounts and have removed yourself from the electoral roll in Australia • you purchased a car and taken out insurances in XXXX • you intend living in XXXX for a considerable and indeterminable period of time with your spouse and child. The duration and continuity of your presence in Australia supports the argument that you established a long-term place of abode in XXXX. While you are a citizen of Australia, this does not outweigh the enduring association and connection you have, and maintain, in XXXX. Whilst the question of a usual place of abode is a question of fact, generally the phrase is interpreted as the abode customarily or commonly when you are physically in a country. Your place of abode does not have to be fixed but must have the attributes of a place of residence or a place to live. Since XXXX, your usual place of abode is XXXX. Therefore, while you are a citizen of Australia, the Commissioner considers you have established a permanent place of abode outside Australia for tax purposes in XXXX since XXXX tax year. | Detailed Reasoning - The 183 days Test: Where a person is present in Australia for 183 days during the year of income the person will be a resident, unless the Commissioner is satisfied that the person's usual place of abode is outside Australia and the person does not intend to take up residence in Australia. You have been present in XXXX for more than 183 days in XXXX tax year and thereafter, therefore you are a non-resident for tax purposes under this test for the year. | Detailed Reasoning - The superannuation Test: An individual is still considered to be a resident if that person is eligible to contribute to the Public Sector Superannuation Scheme (PSS) or the Commonwealth Superannuation Scheme (CSS), or that person is the spouse or child under 16 of such a person. You are not a contributing member of the PSS or the CSS or a spouse of such a person, or a child under 16 of such a person. You are not a resident for tax purposes under this test. | Detailed Reasoning - Application to your circumstances: You moved to XXXX on work visa and since then have lived and worked there. You now have a XXXX residency and got married to a XXXX resident and intend to stay with your spouse there. You have no intention to return to Australia. You have built long-term social and family relationships in XXXX and removed yourself from the electoral roll in Australia. Furthermore, you have set up new bank accounts XXXX and bought motor vehicles and obtained an international licence to drive in XXXX. Therefore, you are a non-resident of Australia for tax purposes for the 20XX tax year and future years as long as you are in XXXX. This may change if you decide to return to Australia and meet the residency test for tax purposes at a future date.

This ruling applies for the following periods: