Private ruling: Income Tax: Tax Incentive for Early Stage Investors
Date of advice: 29 May 2017
Published: September 2017
Ruling period: 1 July 2016 to 30 June 2017
Date scheme commenced: 1 July 2016

Ruling: Q1: Does Company Z meet the criteria of an Early Stage Innovation Company (ESIC) under subsection 360-40(1) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997)? | A1: Yes.

Relevant facts and circumstances: This ruling is based on the facts stated in the description of the scheme that is set out below. If your circumstances are materially different from these facts, this ruling has no effect and you cannot rely on it. The fact sheet has more information about relying on your private ruling. 1. Company Z was incorporated in Australia on DDMMYY. Its equity interests are not listed for quotation in the official list of any stock exchange. 2. Company Z is not a subsidiary of another company and does not own shares in another company. 3. Company Z's assessable income is less than $200,000 and has expenses of less than $1,000,000 in the previous income year, i.e. the year ended 30 June 2016. 4. Company Z will strategically and effectively communicate the companies Intellectual Property to selected world leading technology companies. The Directors of Company Z intend to meet with selected Country A venture capital companies. 5. An Intellectual Property Assignment Deed has been entered in which any Intellectual Property assets by the inventor are assigned to Company Z. 6. Company Z is seeking investment to continue to develop and commercialise the technology. Information provided 7. You have provided information in a number of documents and phone conversations in relation to 'The Innovation', including: ● your private ruling application. ● our phone conversation with you. ● supplementary information provided. 8. We have referred to the relevant information within these documents and conversations in applying the relevant tests to your circumstances. 9. You propose to issue new shares in Company Z to various investors to assist in funding the continued development and commercialisation of the technology.

Relevant legislative provisions: Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Subdivision 360-A | Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 section 360-40 | Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 section 360-45

Reasons for decision: Summary: All legislative references are to the ITAA 1997 unless otherwise indicated. | Summary: Company Z meets the eligibility requirements of, an ESIC under, subsection 360-40(1). | Detailed Reasoning - Qualifying Early Stage Innovation Company: 1. Subsection 360-40(1) outlines the criteria required for a company to qualify as an Early Stage Innovation Company (ESIC) at a particular time in an income year. This time is referred to as the test time. The criteria are based on a series of tests to identify if the company is at an early stage of its development and it is developing new or significantly improved innovations to generate an economic return. | Detailed Reasoning - 'The early stage test': 2. The early stage test requirements are outlined in detail within paragraphs 360-40(1)(a) to (d). | Detailed Reasoning - Incorporation or Registration - paragraph 360-40(1)(a): 3. To meet the requirement in paragraph 360-40(1)(a), at a particular time (the test time) in an income year (the current year) the company must have been either: i. incorporated in Australia within the last three income years (the latest being the current year); or ii. incorporated in Australia within the last six income years (the latest being the current year), and across the last three of those income years the company and its 100% subsidiaries incurred total expenses of $1 million or less; or iii. registered in the Australian Business Register (ABR) within the last three income years (the latest being the current year). 4. The term 'current year' is defined in subsection 360-40(1) with reference to the 'test time'; the 'current year' being the income year in which the company issues shares to the investor. 5. A company that does not meet any of these conditions will not qualify as an ESIC. | Detailed Reasoning - Total expenses - paragraph 360-40(1)(b): 6. To meet the requirement in paragraph 360-40(1)(b), the company and its 100% subsidiaries must have incurred total expenses of $1 million or less in the income year before the current year. | Detailed Reasoning - Assessable income - paragraph 360-40(1)(c): 7. To meet the requirement in paragraph 360-40(1)(c), the company and its 100% subsidiaries must have derived total assessable income of $200,000 or less in the income year before the current year. | Detailed Reasoning - No stock exchange listing - paragraph 360-40(1)(d): 8. To meet the requirement in paragraph 360-40(1)(d), the company must not be listed on any stock exchange in Australia or a foreign country. | Detailed Reasoning - Innovation tests: 9. If the company satisfies the early stage test, the company must also satisfy one of two innovation tests: the objective (100 point) test or the principles-based test. | Detailed Reasoning - 'Principles-based test' - subparagraphs 360-40(1)(e)(i) to (iv): 10. To satisfy the principles-based test, the company must meet five requirements in paragraph 360-40(1)(e). This is tested at a time immediately after the relevant new shares are issued to the investor. 11. The company can demonstrate that it meets each requirement through existing documentation such as a business plan, commercialisation strategy, competition analysis or other company documents. The company must be able to show that tangible steps have been or will be taken in relation to each of the requirements. 12. The five requirements of the principles-based test, as outlined in paragraph 360-40(1)(e) are: i. the company must be genuinely focused on developing one or more new or significantly improved innovations for commercialisation ii. the business relating to that innovation must have a high growth potential iii. the company must demonstrate that it has the potential to be able to successfully scale up the business relating to the innovation iv. the company must demonstrate that it has the potential to be able to address a broader than local market, including global markets, through that business, and v. the company must demonstrate that it has the potential to be able to have competitive advantages for that business. | Detailed Reasoning - Developing new or significantly improved innovations for commercialisation: 13. For the purposes of Subdivision 360-A, the Explanatory Memorandum to the Tax Laws Amendment (Tax Incentives for Innovation) Bill 2016 ('EM') provides the following at paragraph 1.76 in relation to the definition of innovation: “Implicit in the definition of innovation is the requirement that the company is developing a new or significantly improved type of innovation such as a product, process, service, marketing or organisational method. This list of various types of innovations provides flexibility for innovation companies and is adaptable to current and future innovations. The Oslo Manual, published by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) provides a description of these different types of innovations…” 14. The innovation being developed by the company must either be new or significantly improved for an applicable addressable market. The company's addressable market is the revenue opportunity or market demand arising from the innovation or the related business. The addressable market must be objective and realistic. 15. Improvements must be significant in nature to meet this requirement. Customising existing products or minor changes resulting from software updates, pricing strategies or seasonal changes are examples of improvements that would not be considered significant. 16. The OECD Oslo Manual defines innovations as significant changes, with the intention of distinguishing significant changes from routine minor changes. However, it is important to recognise that an innovation can also consist of a series of smaller incremental changes that together constitute a significant change. 17. In discussing services innovation activity, paragraph 111 of the OECD Oslo Manual states, “Innovation activity in services also tends to be a continuous process, consisting of a series of incremental changes in products and processes. This may occasionally complicate the identification of innovations in services in terms of single events, i.e. as the implementation of a significant change in products, processes or other methods.” 18. The OECD Oslo Manual, in relation to defining innovative services, states at paragraph 161 that “innovations in services can include significant improvements in how they are provided (for example, in terms of their efficiency or speed), the addition of new functions or characteristics to existing services, or the introduction of entirely new services.” 19. The company must be genuinely focused on developing the innovation for a commercial purpose in order to generate economic value and revenue for the company. This requirement draws the distinction between simply having an idea and commercialising an idea. 20. 'Commercialisation' includes a range of activities that involve the implementation or sale of a new or significantly improved innovation that will directly lead to the generation of economic value for the company. | Detailed Reasoning - High growth potential: 21. The company must be able to demonstrate that it has the potential for high growth within a broad addressable market. This refers to the company's ability to rapidly expand its business. Companies that are limited to supplying local customers will not meet this requirement. | Detailed Reasoning - Scalability: 22. The company must be able to demonstrate that it has the potential to successfully scale up the business. The company must have operating leverage, where as it increases its market share or enters into new markets, its existing revenues can be multiplied with a reduced or minimal increase in operating costs per unit. | Detailed Reasoning - Broader than local market: 23. The company must be able to demonstrate that it has the potential to address a market that is broader than a local city, area or region. The company does not need to have a serviceable market at a national, multinational or global scale at the test time. However, it does need to show that the business is capable of addressing a market that is broader than a local market and that the business can be adapted to a broader scale in the future. | Detailed Reasoning - Competitive advantages: 24. The company must be able to demonstrate that it has the potential to have competitive advantages, such as a cost or differential advantage over its competitors which are sustainable for the business as it expands. The company can analyse what competitors in the market offer, and consider whether the company has a differentiating advantage that would allow it to outperform these competitors. | Detailed Reasoning - Application to your circumstances: Test time 25. For the purposes of this ruling, the test time for determining if Company Z is a qualifying ESIC will be a particular date during the income year ending 30 June 2017. Current year 26. For the purposes of subsection 360-40(1), the current year will be the year ending 30 June 2017 (the 2017 income year). For clarity, in relation to particular requirements within subsection 360-40(1), the last three income years will include the years ending 30 June 2017, 2016 and 2015, and the income year before the current year will be the year ending 30 June 2016 (the 2016 income year). | Detailed Reasoning - Early stage test: Incorporation or Registration - paragraph 360-40(1)(a) 27. As Company Z was registered on 15 August 2014, which is within the last 3 income years, subparagraph 360-40(1)(a)(i)is satisfied. Total expenses - paragraph 360-40(1)(b) 28. As Company Z had expenses less than $1,000,000 in the prior income year, paragraph 360-40(1)(b) is satisfied. Assessable income - paragraph 360-40(1)(c) 29. As Company Z's assessable income for the prior income year is less than $200,000 and paragraphs 360-40(1)(c) is satisfied. No stock exchange listing - paragraph 360-40(1)(d) 30. As Company Z is privately owned and is not listed on any stock exchange in Australia or a foreign country, subparagraph 360-40(1)(a)(d) is satisfied. Conclusion on early stage test 31. Company Z will satisfy the early stage test for the entire 2017 income year, as each of the requirements within paragraphs 360-40(1)(a) to (d) have been satisfied. | Detailed Reasoning - Principles based test: Developing new or significantly improved innovations for commercialisation in the addressable market - subparagraph 360-40(1)(e)(i) The addressable market 32. Based on the details you provided we are of the view the addressable market is the global market. New or significantly improved in the addressable market 33. Company Z is developing a new form of technology. The technology provides a service and is particularly suited for a variety of customers. 34. The information you provided outlines in detail the design of the system. ● You have provided extensive details comparing features and outlining why your technology is different compared to other available technologies. ● You state there is no other competitor in the Australian market which offers a technology that is comparable to your technology. Genuinely focussed on developing for commercialisation - subparagraph 360-40(1)(e)(i) 35. You do not expect the technology to be fully developed before 30 June 2017. You have provided us with a timeline of additional steps required to completely commercialise the service, achieve product-market fit and achieve its growth and traction targets. Conclusion on subparagraph 360-40(1)(e)(i) 36. Company Z is genuinely focussed on developing the technology for a commercial purpose. Company Z's technology will be a significantly improved product compared to existing products. 37. Therefore, subparagraph 360-40(1)(e)(i) will be satisfied for the time period from 1 July 2016 until 30 June 2017 or the date when the technology has been fully developed, whichever occurs earliest. Once the technology has been fully developed, Company Z will no longer be 'developing' the product for commercialisation and subparagraph 360-40((1)(e)(i) will no longer be satisfied. High growth potential - subparagraph 360-40(1)(e)(ii) 38. Company Z expects the technology to appeal to a wide range of industries. This aids decision making and is particularly useful when assessing product or service viability in particular markets. 39. Company Z is responsible for the development of the technology. If the commercialisation strategy is successful, this will give Company Z the ability to generate revenue by either securing licencing agreement or selling the technology on a worldwide scale. 40. Therefore, subparagraph 360-40(1)(e)(ii) will be satisfied. Scalability - subparagraph 360-40(1)(e)(iii) 41. Projections provided by Company Z illustrate the increase in projected sales. 42. Given that technology will be available globally, it is expected that the technology has the potential to successfully scale up its business. 43. Company Z's strategy for the use of the technology will be able to generate increased revenue by securing licensing agreements with world leading manufacturers. This operating leverage affords Company Z the potential to successfully scale up its business. 44. Therefore, subparagraph 360-40(1)(e)(iii) will be satisfied. Broader than local market- subparagraph 360-40(1)(e)(iv) 45. Company Z's technology will be targeted at the international market. 46. The technology can be used worldwide by any business. Thus, the ultimate addressable market is on a global scale and is not confined to Australia or selected countries. 47. Company Z has demonstrated that the technology has the potential to address a broader market than just Australia, including international markets. 48. Therefore, subparagraph 360-40(1)(e)(iv) will be satisfied. Competitive advantages - subparagraph 360-40(1)(e)(v) 49. Company Z's technology has differentiating features, as described in paragraphs 34 to 37 above, which may give it a competitive advantage. 50. Being the first type of technology, Company Z has the first mover advantage. Company Z has demonstrated the potential for the technology to have competitive advantages within the professional business community, satisfying subparagraph 360-40(1)(e)(v). Conclusion on principles test 51. Company Z satisfies the principles based test as it satisfies the requirements within subparagraphs 360-40(1)(e)(i)to (v) for the period commencing 1 July 2016 until 30 June 2017 or the date when technology has been fully developed and is ready for sale, whichever occurs earlier. Conclusion 52. Company Z meets the eligibility criteria of an ESIC under section 360-40 for the period commencing 1 July 2016 until the earlier of 30 June 2017 or the date when technology has been fully developed and is ready for sale, whichever occurs earlier.