ATO ID 2012/90: Deductions: Internal estimates of notional funding cost
Date of decision: 25 October 2012
Year of income: Income year ended 30 June 2009 Income year ended 30 June 2010
Business line: Large Business and International

Issue
In determining the profits attributable to a foreign bank's Australian permanent establishment under the business profits article of a relevant tax treaty, can the bank deduct an amount it estimates would be the funding cost if assets employed in its Australian branch operations had been funded under certain terms and conditions?

Decision
No. In determining the profits attributable to a foreign bank's Australian permanent establishment under the business profits article of a relevant tax treaty, the bank cannot deduct an amount it estimates would be the funding cost if assets employed in its Australian branch operations had been funded under certain terms and conditions.

Facts
A foreign bank is incorporated in a country ( home country ) with which Australia has entered into an agreement for the relief of double taxation ( relevant tax treaty ). The foreign bank is a tax resident of the home country under both Australian domestic law and the relevant tax treaty. The foreign bank is regulated by its home country banking regulator. The foreign bank carries on business operations through a fixed place of business in Australia (Australian branch operations). APRA has granted a restricted Australian banking licence for the foreign bank's Australian branch operations. The Australian branch operations constitute business carried on by foreign bank through an Australian permanent establishment for the purposes of applying the relevant article (usually article 7) of the relevant tax treaty ( business profits article ). Accordingly, profits attributable to Australian branch operations may be taxed by Australia. The foreign bank includes an amount as a 'cost' of, or 'charge' to, its 'Australian branch' in its 'Australian branch accounts' or in its accounts used for its internal management purposes. The amount of such 'cost' or 'charge' is the amount determined by the bank as the estimated additional interest cost if assets employed in its Australian branch operations, that were funded by Australian dollar borrowings by the bank, had instead been funded by more expensive longer term Australian dollar borrowings of a duration or term equal to the average duration or term of the bank's global borrowings.

Reasons for decision
Summary: Subsection 3(2) of the International Tax Agreements Act 1953 (IAA) provides that the reference, in the business profits article of the relevant tax treaty, to profits attributable to business carried by the foreign bank through its Australian permanent establishment, is a reference to the Australian taxable income derived by the foreign bank from the business carried on through its Australian permanent establishment. Refer also to paragraph 3.29 of Taxation Ruling TR 2001/11 Income tax : international transfer pricing - operation of Australia's permanent establishment attribution rules . Accordingly, in the case of costs of a foreign bank carrying on banking business through an Australian permanent establishment, it is necessary to consider section 8-1 of Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997) and Part IIIB of Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (ITAA 1936). | Detailed Reasoning - Section 8-1 of ITAA 1997: Interest expense incurred by the foreign bank is deductible under section 8-1 of ITAA 1997, in determining the profit of the foreign bank taxable in Australia under the business profits article of the relevant tax treaty, to the extent the interest expense is: The above requirements of section 8-1 of the ITAA 1997 and subsection 3(2) of IAA are consistent with paragraph 3 of the business profits article of the relevant tax treaty, namely: '...there shall be allowed as deductions expenses of the enterprise, being expenses which are incurred for the purposes of the permanent establishment...' Internal 'charges', such as amounts 'charged' to particular business operations of a company in its management accounts for 'transactions' with other of the taxpayer's business operations, are not a loss or outgoing incurred for the purposes of applying section 8-1 of ITAA 1997: refer Max Factor & Co v. Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1984) 84 ATC 4060. A loss or outgoing must be incurred by a non-resident in order to be deductible under section 8-1 of the ITAA 1997 in determining the non-resident's Australian taxable income from its business carried on through its Australian permanent establishment for the purposes of applying the business profits article of the relevant tax treaty. Refer also to paragraphs 1.8, 1.10, 1.15 to 1.17, 3.36 and 4.4 (last sentence) of Taxation Ruling TR 2001/11. It is noted that paragraph 3.47 and paragraph 3.48 of TR 2001/11 are only relevant in relation to attributing income or expenditure to the non-resident's relevant functions and assets. The amount treated by the foreign bank as a 'cost' of, or 'charge' to, its 'Australian branch' in its 'Australian branch accounts', or in its accounts used for its internal management purposes, is not an amount of interest expense or other loss or outgoing incurred by the bank. The bank has funded assets employed by the bank in its Australian branch operations with Australian dollar borrowings for which it incurs interest expense in carrying on its Australian branch operations. For completeness it is noted that would not be possible to reasonably treat the 'cost' or 'charge' as a reasonable proxy for any actual interest or other funding costs incurred by the foreign bank globally to fund the assets employed in its Australian branch operations. In this respect we note: | Detailed Reasoning - Part IIIB of ITAA 1936: Part IIIB needs to be considered if the foreign bank does not make an election under section 160ZZVB. The conditions for operation of sections 160ZZZ and 160ZZZA of ITAA 1936 are not satisfied because the hypothesised more expensive longer term Australian dollar borrowings (for which the bank determined the estimated additional interest cost) do not comprise or represent "an amount [that] has been made available by a foreign bank for use by an Australian branch of the bank and is recorded in the bank's accounting records as having been provided by the bank to the branch". If the foreign bank does make an election under section 160ZZVB Taxation Ruling TR 2005/11 does not apply to permit the deduction of the 'cost' or 'charge' because the 'cost' or 'charge' is not in relation to: a bank internally transfer[ing] funds to or from a PE in the ordinary course of carrying on business through that PE [paragraph 1 of TR 2005/11]. Accordingly, the amount of such 'cost' or 'charge' is not deductible under section 8-1 of ITAA 1997 in determining the Australian taxable income of the foreign bank in accordance with the business profits article of the relevant tax treaty.

Legislative references: Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 section 160ZZZ section 160ZZZA section 160ZZVB
Case references: Max Factor & Co v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1984) 84 ATC 4060
Related public rulings and determinations: Taxation Ruling TR 2001/11 | Taxation Ruling TR 2005/11
Related ATO interpretative decisions: ATO ID 2012/91 | ATO ID 2012/92
Subject references: Deductions & expenses Interest allocation Interest expenses Permanent Establishment