ATO ID 2008/130: Income tax treatment of securitisation of leases
Date of decision: 2 July 2008
Year of income: Year ended 30 June 2009
Business line: Public Groups and International

Issue
Does an entity that acquires motor vehicles, leases them and assigns all of its rights under the leases including an amount specified as the residual value of the motor vehicles, to a special purpose vehicle under a securitisation arrangement, hold the motor vehicles as trading stock for the purposes of Division 70 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997)?

Decision
No. The entity does not, in the circumstances described above, hold the motor vehicles as trading stock for the purposes of Division 70 of the ITAA 1997.

Facts
An entity carries on a business of originating leases in motor vehicles and financing the leases through a securitisation arrangement. The entity acquires motor vehicles from suppliers and leases them for private or business use. Immediately after a lease is entered into with a customer, the entity assigns its rights under the lease, including an amount specified as the residual value of the motor vehicle, to a trust, which is a special purpose securitisation vehicle (the SPV) in consideration for the net present value of those rights. The SPV does not obtain any ownership interest in a motor vehicle by accepting this assignment. The SPV issues marketable securities which it sells to investors, the proceeds of which it uses to pay the entity for the receivables. The entity uses the payment from the SPV to pay for the vehicles. It derives its income from managing and administering the collection of lease payments over the life of the lease. Upon termination of a vehicle lease, the vehicle is sold. The entity transfers title to the vehicle to the new owner but the proceeds of the sale belong to the SPV.

Reasons for decision
Summary: The term 'trading stock' is defined in section 70-10 of the ITAA 1997 as including anything produced, manufactured or acquired that is held for purposes of manufacture, sale or exchange in the ordinary course of a business. The definition is not exhaustive and relies on the ordinary meaning of 'trading stock', or its alternative expression 'stock-in-trade'. The ordinary meaning denotes 'goods held by a trader in such goods for sale or exchange in the ordinary course of his trade' ( Federal Commissioner of Taxation v. Sutton Motors (Chullora) Wholesale Pty Ltd (1985) 157 CLR 277; (1985) 85 ATC 4398; (1985) 16 ATR 567). An important element of the definition requires a particular relation to exist between the thing and the business carried on by the entity - the thing must be 'held for purposes of manufacture, sale or exchange in the ordinary course of a business' (Professor R. W. Parsons in Income Taxation in Australia , Electronic edition, 2001, University of Sydney Library, Sydney). This has been affirmed by High Court authorities including John v. Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1989) 166 CLR 417; (1989) 89 ATC 4101; (1989) 20 ATR 1 where the Court stated: [the definition of trading stock] presupposes that the person by whom [the goods] are produced, manufactured, acquired or purchased is or will be engaged in trade in those goods. ... Thus the relevant issue is not the nature of the business carried on but rather whether the person is a trader in the goods which are claimed to be trading stock. [emphasis added] Clearly the first part of the trading stock definition in section 70-10 of the ITAA 1997 is met in the present case, as the entity acquires motor vehicles which are 'things'. Secondly, the motor vehicles must be 'held for purposes of manufacture, sale or exchange in the ordinary course of a business'. It was accepted in Federal Commissioner of Taxation v. Cyclone Scaffolding Pty Ltd (1987) 18 FCR 183; (1987) 87 ATC 5083; (1987) 19 ATR 674 ( Cyclone Scaffolding ) and related cases ( Memorex Pty Ltd v. FCT (1987) 19 ATR 553; (1987) 87 ATC 5034, FCT v. GKN Kwikform Services Pty Ltd (1991) 21 ATR 1532; (1991) 91 ATC 4336, Federal Commissioner of Taxation v. Hyteco Hiring Pty Ltd (1992) 39 FCR 502; (1992) 24 ATR 218; (1992) 92 ATC 4694 ( Hyteco )) that, for income tax purposes, an asset could be held either as trading stock or as a depreciating asset but not simultaneously as both. As Wilcox J noted in Cyclone Scaffolding , this would present a conceptual problem, as depreciating plant is ordinarily treated as a capital asset while trading stock is held on revenue account. In R & D Holdings Pty Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner of Taxation [2006] FCA 981; (2006) 2006 ATC 4472; (2006) 64 ATR 71 ( R&D Holdings ), Finn J held that the taxpayer held a property for section 70-10 of the ITAA 1997 purposes 'at the relevant time for the dual profit making purposes of sale or lease of subdivided lots'. That case, however, concerned land that in the relevant income year was under development and was intended to be subdivided predominantly for purposes of sale. Here the entity holds chattels, which are not susceptible to subdivision, in circumstances where there is no ambiguity of purpose - the intention is to lease them. R & D Holdings is not authority for the proposition that in these circumstances the chattels are held as trading stock. While the entity acquires the vehicles with an intention of eventually disposing of them on the termination of each respective lease, this fact does not mean that the entity holds the vehicles for the purpose of sale. In Hyteco the Court held that forklift trucks which were used in the business as hire vehicles and disposed of at the end of their useful life were not held for purpose of sale but for the purpose of lease. Similarly, in the present case, the vehicles are not held for the purpose of sale during the term of the lease for the purposes of the definition in section 70-10 of the ITAA 1997. In addition, any disposal of a motor vehicle at the end of the lease would not be made in the ordinary course of the entity's business. In Hyteco the Federal Court held that the disposal, even at a profit, of ex-hire equipment was an affair of capital and not made in the ordinary course of the taxpayer's business of leasing and hiring equipment. Therefore the entity does not hold the motor vehicles for purposes of sale in the ordinary course of its business, as required by the definition of 'trading stock' in section 70-10 of the ITAA 1997.

Legislative references: Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 section 70-10
Case references: Federal Commissioner of Taxation v. Sutton Motors (Chullora) Wholesale Pty Ltd (1985) 157 CLR 277 (1985) 85 ATC 4398 (1985) 16 ATR 567
Related public rulings and determinations: Taxation Ruling IT 81
Other references: Parsons, R.W. Income Taxation in Australia, 2001, electronic edition, University of Sydney (originally published 1985, The Law Book Company, Sydney)
Subject references: Acquisition of trading stock Assignment of rights & entitlements Closing stock Disposal of trading stock Residual values Securitisation