Title: トマス・スキャンロン (T. M. Scanlon)
Section: 著作
Subsection: 論文

Scanlon, Thomas (Winter 1972). “A theory of freedom of expression”. Philosophy & Public Affairs (Wiley) 1 (2):  204–226. JSTOR 2264971. Scanlon, Thomas (Summer 1975). “Thomson on privacy”. Philosophy & Public Affairs (Wiley) 4 (4):  315–322. JSTOR 2265076. Scanlon, T. M. (November 1975). “Preference and urgency”. The Journal of Philosophy 72 (19):  655–669. doi:10.2307/2024630. JSTOR 2024630. Scanlon, Thomas (Autumn 1976). “Nozick on rights, liberty, and property”. Philosophy & Public Affairs (Wiley) 6 (2):  3–25. JSTOR 2265059. Scanlon, T. M. (1977). “Due process”. Nomos 18:  93–125. JSTOR 24219202. Scanlon, T. M. (May 1977). “Rights, goals, and fairness”. Erkenntnis 11 (1):  81–95. doi:10.1007/BF00169845. JSTOR 20010534. http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:17542460. Scanlon, T. M. (October 1986). “Equality of resources and equality of welfare: a forced marriage?”. Ethics 97 (1):  111–118. doi:10.1086/292820. JSTOR 2381409. https://dash.harvard.edu/bitstream/1/3311525/2/Scanlon_EqualityResources.pdf.  Pdf.Scanlon, Thomas (Summer 1990). “Promises and practices”. Philosophy & Public Affairs (Wiley) 19 (3):  199–226. JSTOR 2265394. Scanlon, T. M. (Spring 1992). “The aims and authority of moral theory”. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 12 (1):  1–23. doi:10.1093/ojls/12.1.1. JSTOR 764567. Scanlon, T. M. (June 1995). “Moral theory: understanding and disagreement: Reviewed work: The Viability of Moral Theory by Allan Gibbard, Alasdair MacIntyre”. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 55 (2):  343–356. doi:10.2307/2108551. JSTOR 2108551. Scanlon, Thomas (Spring 1997). “The status of well-being”. Michigan Quarterly Review (University of Michigan) XXXVI (2):  290–310. hdl:2027/spo.act2080.0036.210.  See also Tanner lecture pdf.Scanlon, T. M. (July 2000). “Intention and permissibility: T. M. Scanlon”. Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volume 74 (1):  301–317. doi:10.1111/1467-8349.00073.  Pdf.See also: Dancy, Jonathan (July 2000). “Intention and permissibility: Jonathan Dancy”. Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volume 74 (1):  319–338. doi:10.1111/1467-8349.00074. Scanlon, T. M. (2003). “Individualism, equality, and rights”. University of Miami Law Review (University of Miami School of Law) 58 (1):  359–368. http://repository.law.miami.edu/umlr/vol58/iss1/19/.  Pdf.Scanlon, T. M. (January 2003). “Reply to Gauthier and Gibbard: Précis of What We Owe to Each Other”. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 66 (1):  176–189. doi:10.1111/j.1933-1592.2003.tb00249.x. JSTOR 20140523. See also: Gauthier, David (January 2003). “Are we moral debtors?: Reviewed work: What We Owe to Each Other by T. M. Scanlon”. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 66 (1):  162–168. doi:10.1111/j.1933-1592.2003.tb00250.x. JSTOR 20140521. See also: Gibbard, Allan (January 2003). “Reasons to reject allowing: Reviewed work: What We Owe to Each Other by T. M. Scanlon”. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 66 (1):  169–175. doi:10.1111/j.1933-1592.2003.tb00251.x. hdl:2027.42/73518. JSTOR 20140522. https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/73518/1/j.1933-1592.2003.tb00251.x.pdf. Scanlon, T. M. (November 2003). “Metaphysics and morals”. Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 77 (2):  7–22. doi:10.2307/3219738. JSTOR 3219738. Scanlon, T. M. (December 2003). “Replies”. Ratio 16 (4):  424–439. doi:10.1046/j.1467-9329.2003.00231.x. http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:3310977. See also: O'Neill, Onora (December 2003). “Constructivism vs. contractualism”. Ratio 16 (4):  319–331. doi:10.1046/j.1467-9329.2003.00226.x. See also: Wolff, Jonathan (December 2003). “Scanlon on well-being”. Ratio 16 (4):  332–345. doi:10.1046/j.1467-9329.2003.00227.x. See also: Raz, Joseph (December 2003). “Numbers, with and without contractualism”. Ratio 16 (4):  346–367. doi:10.1046/j.1467-9329.2003.00228.x. See also: Parfit, Derek (December 2003). “Justifiability to each person”. Ratio 16 (4):  368–390. doi:10.1046/j.1467-9329.2003.00229.x. See also: Timmons, Mark (December 2003). “The limits of moral constructivism”. Ratio 16 (4):  391–423. doi:10.1046/j.1467-9329.2003.00230.x. Scanlon, T. M. (May 2011). “Why not base free speech on autonomy or democracy?”. Virginia Law Review (The Virginia Law Review Association via JSTOR) 97 (3):  541–548. JSTOR 41261520.  Pdf.Scanlon, T. M. (October 2011). “Forum: libertarianism and liberty”. Boston Review (Boston Critic, Inc.). http://bostonreview.net/forum/libertarianism-and-liberty. Scanlon, T. M. (June 2012). “Provocation: everyone is a philosopher!”. Harvard Law Review Forum (The Harvard Law Review Association) 125:  228–235. http://harvardlawreview.org/2012/06/provocation-everyone-is-a-philospher/. Scanlon, T. M. (Spring 2013). “Responsibility and the value of choice”. Think 12 (33):  9–16. doi:10.1017/S1477175612000280. Scanlon, Thomas M. (June 2013). “Giving desert its due”. Philosophical Explorations 16 (2):  101–116. doi:10.1080/13869795.2013.787437. Scanlon, T. M. (June 2015). “Kamm on the disvalue of death”. Journal of Medical Ethics 41 (6):  490. doi:10.1136/medethics-2014-102037. PMID 25005111. See also: Kamm, Frances (June 2015). “Summary of Bioethical Prescriptions”. Journal of Medical Ethics 41 (6):  488–489. doi:10.1136/medethics-2014-102018. PMID 24797609.