The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) provided food assistance to a monthly average of 40.3 million persons in 20.1 million households in FY2018. Total benefit costs were $60.6 billion in FY2018. SNAP participation and costs increased markedly from FY2007 to FY2013, mostly as a result of automatic and legislated responses to the recession. In FY2014, both participation and costs declined from peak FY2013 levels and have continued to decline. While much of the FY2007 to FY2013 increase in participation and costs was attributable to the poor economy, states during this period also increasingly adopted more expansive "categorical eligibility" rules—a set of policies that make a SNAP applicant eligible based on the applicant's involvement with other low-income assistance programs: benefits from the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) block grant, Supplemental Security Income (SSI), and state-financed General Assistance (GA) programs. This report discusses categorical eligibility and some of the issues raised by it. It first describes the three different types of categorical eligibility: traditional categorical eligibility conveyed through receipt of need-based cash assistance, and the newer "narrow" and "broad-based" categorical eligibilities conveyed via TANF "noncash" benefits. It also provides recent information on current state practices with regard to categorical eligibility. Under current law and regulation, it is a state option to implement broad-based categorical eligibility for SNAP. As a result, potential changes to curtail (or expand) categorical eligibility may impact some states more than others. This report includes state-by-state information to assist in gauging these disparate impacts. SNAP is typically reauthorized in an omnibus farm bill law, and neither of the last two farm bills ultimately included changes to categorical eligibility rules. The Agriculture Act of 2014 (2014 Farm Bill, P.L. 113-79 ) made no changes to SNAP categorical eligibility rules. The House-passed version of the bill that became the 2014 Farm Bill would have eliminated "narrow" and "broad-based categorical eligibility," retaining only "traditional" categorical eligibility for recipients of cash assistance. However, the House-passed provision was not included in the bill's conference agreement. The most recent farm bill, Agriculture Improvement Act of 2018 ("2018 Farm Bill," P.L. 115-334 ) made no changes to SNAP categorical eligibility rules. The House-passed version of the bill would have made changes to limit but not eliminate broad-based categorical eligibility. These changes were not included in the conference agreement. While the statute on categorical eligibility has not changed in recent years, the Trump Administration has plans to change the policy via regulation. These proposals are discussed further in " Recent Proposals to Change Categorical Eligibility ." Federal law provides the basic eligibility rules for SNAP. There are two basic pathways to gain financial eligibility for SNAP: (1) having income and resources below specified levels set out in federal SNAP law; and (2) being "categorically," or automatically, eligible based on receiving benefits from other specified low-income assistance programs. Under the regular federal rules, SNAP provides eligibility to households based on low income and limited assets. Households must have net income (income after specified deductions) below 100% of the federal poverty guidelines. In addition, federal rules provide that households without an elderly or disabled member must have monthly gross income (income before deductions) below 130% of the federal poverty guidelines. In FY2019, for a household of three people, in the 48 contiguous states, DC, Guam, and the Virgin Islands, this monthly gross income limit is $2,252. Additionally, the regular eligibility rules provide that a household must have liquid assets below a specified level. Under federal rules in FY2019, a household's liquid assets must also be below $2,250, and below $3,500 in the case of households with an elderly or disabled member. The value of the home is excluded from this "assets test," as are certain other forms of assets (e.g., retirement and educational savings). Further, a portion of the value of a household's vehicles is not counted toward the asset limit (up to $4,650 of the fair market value of a household's vehicles). However, federal law gives states the option to further exclude the value of vehicles from being counted toward the asset limit. States may elect to use the exclusion applicable for TANF assistance in their SNAP program. Under TANF, many states fully exclude the value of one vehicle. This option is distinct from categorical eligibility. Federal law also makes households in which all members are either eligible for or receive benefits from TANF, Supplemental Security Income (SSI), or state-financed GA programs categorically, or automatically, eligible for SNAP. These households, who have already gone through eligibility determination for those programs, bypass the income and resource tests discussed above and are deemed financially eligible. They then have their SNAP benefits determined. Categorically eligible households have their SNAP benefits determined under the same rules as other households. A household's SNAP benefit amount is based on the maximum benefit (which varies by household size) and its net countable income after deductions for certain expenses. While the household may be categorically eligible, its net income may be too high to actually receive a SNAP benefit. The exception is that all eligible households consisting of one or two persons are eligible for at least the minimum monthly benefit, set at $15 in the 48 contiguous states and the District of Columbia for FY2019. Special rules providing for expedited eligibility of cash assistance recipients date back to amendments to the Food Stamp program enacted in 1971. These rules were eliminated in the rewrite of food stamp law enacted in 1977, but they were reinstated in phases during the early 1980s through 1990. Categorical eligibility was seen as advancing the goals of simplifying administration, easing entry to the program for eligible households, emphasizing coordination among low-income assistance programs, and reducing the potential for errors in establishing eligibility for benefits. The Food Security Act of 1985 conveyed categorical eligibility to all households receiving cash aid from Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC), SSI, or state-run GA programs. These programs had their own income and resource tests (often more stringent than food stamp tests), so subjecting a household to a separate set of income and resource tests for food stamps could be seen as redundant and inefficient. The current form of categorical eligibility resulted from the 1996 welfare reform law (the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996, P.L. 104-193 ). That law ended AFDC, replacing it with TANF. AFDC was a traditional cash assistance program. Within some federal rules, states set AFDC eligibility and benefit amounts, but federal law established it as a cash welfare program. AFDC eligibility rules were generally more restrictive than those for food stamps, and most AFDC families also received a substantial food stamp benefit. TANF, on the other hand, is a broad-purpose block grant that gives states broad flexibility to expend funds. The statutory purpose of TANF is to increase state flexibility to achieve four policy goals: 1. provide assistance to needy families so that children can be cared for in their own homes or in the homes of their relatives; 2. end dependence by needy parents on government benefits through promoting work, job preparation, and marriage; 3. reduce the incidence of out-of-wedlock pregnancies; and 4. promote the formation and maintenance of two-parent families. States may expend TANF funds and associated state funds (called Maintenance of Effort or MOE funds) in any manner "reasonably calculated" to achieve the TANF purpose, providing broad authority for the types of activities that may be funded. These activities include the traditional cash assistance programs—which convey traditional categorical eligibility. However, in FY2016 traditional cash welfare accounted for only 24% of all expenditures from the TANF block grant and MOE funds. TANF funds a wide range of other benefits and services that seek to ameliorate the effects, or address the root causes, of child poverty. TANF benefits and services to achieve the first two goals of TANF (provide assistance, end dependence of needy parents on government benefits) must be for needy families with children. These benefits or services are need-tested, though states determine their own income thresholds. These benefits are often available to families at higher levels of income than is cash assistance, often a multiple of the federal poverty threshold, and without an asset test. Moreover, TANF services directed at the third and fourth goals shown above can be for any person in a state; that is, TANF services to reduce out-of-wedlock pregnancies or promote two-parent families are not restricted to families with children. Federal rules also do not require that they be need-tested. Thus, these benefits and services are potentially available to a state's entire population. The 1996 welfare reform law did not substantively change SNAP law with respect to categorical eligibility. Rather, it simply replaced the reference to AFDC with one to TANF in the section of law that conveys categorical eligibility. As discussed above, TANF gives states much broader authority than they had under AFDC to offer different types of benefits and services. This expansion of authority under TANF had major implications for categorical eligibility, allowing states to convey categorical eligibility based on receipt of a wide range of human services rather than simply cash welfare. U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) regulations issued in 2000 provide rules for which noncash or in-kind TANF or MOE-funded benefits or services can be used to convey SNAP categorical eligibility. The regulations require that states make categorically eligible for SNAP households in which all members receive or are authorized to receive cash assistance funded by TANF or MOE dollars; and households in which all members receive or are authorized to receive noncash aid funded at least 50% by TANF or MOE dollars. The regulations imposed one restriction on states in conveying categorical eligibility: if the TANF- or MOE-funded benefit or service was aimed at achieving TANF goals three (reducing out-of-wedlock pregnancies) or four (promoting two-parent families), the state would have to choose a program with an income limit of no more than 200% of the federal poverty guideline for conveying categorical eligibility. Additionally, subject to the 200% of poverty restriction discussed above, the regulations give states the option of making categorically eligible for SNAP households in which all members receive or are authorized to receive noncash assistance funded less than 50% by TANF or MOE dollars; and households in which at least one member receives or is authorized to receive noncash aid funded at least partially by TANF or MOE dollars, but the state agency determines the whole household benefits from such noncash aid. As discussed, in instances of categorical eligibility, SNAP applicants can be found eligible for SNAP based on their receipt of benefits from other specified means-tested programs. At minimum, households that receive Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) cash assistance, Supplemental Security Income (SSI), or state-funded general assistance cash benefits must be found categorically eligible for SNAP. However, the 1996 welfare reform law's creation of TANF as a broad-based block grant has allowed for a state option to include a long list of benefits/services that can convey SNAP eligibility. This section discusses state choices in this area as of October 2018. The current status of SNAP categorical eligibility is the product of state choices. At minimum, a state must implement "traditional" categorical eligibility, but some states allow additional programs and benefits to convey categorical eligibility. The USDA has developed a typology of state practices on categorical eligibility, categorizing states into three groups Traditional categorical eligibility only. In its traditional form, a household where all members receive need-tested cash aid from SSI, GA, or TANF is automatically made eligible for SNAP as well. These households have already met the income and (in general) resource test for cash aid. Note that states set income and asset eligibility rules for TANF and GA. SSI provides a federal income floor based on federal rules for the needy who are aged, blind, or disabled. However, states may supplement SSI with their own funds, leading to state variation in SSI eligibility as well. Based on the most current information available, five states currently convey only traditional categorical eligibility. " Narrow" categorical eligibility. These states have expanded categorical eligibility beyond just traditional categorical eligibility, but in a way to limit the number of households made eligible for SNAP. These states convey categorical eligibility through receipt of cash and certain TANF noncash benefits, such as child care and counseling. "Broad-based" categorical eligibility . These states have expanded categorical eligibility in ways that make most, if not all, households with low incomes in a state categorically eligible for SNAP. States could make all low-income households in a state—including those without children—eligible for a TANF-funded service directed at either the reducing out-of-wedlock pregnancies or promoting two-parent families goals of TANF. If a state opted to do so, any low-income household (under 200% of poverty, per regulation) could either receive, or be authorized to receive, such a TANF-funded service. Based on the currently available information, 40 states, the District of Columbia, Guam, and the Virgin Islands have broad-based categorical eligibility policies. USDA currently does not have reliable information on the number of states that have opted to use "narrow" categorical eligibility. However, they do track both the number of states and rules used for states that have opted to use broad-based categorical eligibility. Figure 1 displays a map showing the states that use broad-based categorical eligibility (shaded in blue). Broad-based categorical eligibility is a policy that makes most households with incomes below a certain threshold categorically eligible for SNAP. Typically, households are made categorically eligible through receiving or being authorized to receive a minimal TANF- or MOE-funded benefit or service, such as being given a brochure or being referred to a social services "800" telephone number (see Table 1 ). Recalling the USDA regulation, the brochure or telephone number must be funded with TANF or MOE dollars and thus must be directed at a TANF purpose. The Department of Agriculture reports that, as of February 2018, 42 jurisdictions operated broad-based categorical eligibility to make most or all households in their state with whom the state welfare office comes in contact SNAP eligible. Table 1 shows the use of SNAP broad-based categorical eligibility by state as of October 2018. Of the 43 jurisdictions using broad-based categorical eligibility, 41 make all family types eligible (New Hampshire and New York limit broad-based categorical eligibility to certain household types); 37 currently have no asset test. Note, though, currently in 13 of these jurisdictions, households with an elderly and disabled member with incomes in excess of 200% of the federal poverty guidelines have to meet the regular SNAP asset tests of $3,500 for households of that type); 6 states (Idaho, Indiana, Maine, Michigan, Nebraska, and Texas) apply an asset test for all households); and 33 have a gross income limit above 130% of the federal poverty guidelines. According to USDA policy and guidance, there is a general way that a state would administer broad-based categorical eligibility for a SNAP applicant. The local SNAP office would collect basic income information on the applicant; if the applicant's income is below the limit specified, then the state office would administer, or determine whether a member of the household was authorized to receive, a relatively nominal TANF-funded benefit or service. Receipt of this TANF benefit or service then constitutes SNAP eligibility through broad-based categorical eligibility. (As discussed above, it is still possible to be categorically eligible but receive no benefit because net income is too high. ) As an illustration, in the case of the District of Columbia, as shown in the table, if the applicant's gross income is below 200% of poverty, the applicant would then receive a particular brochure for a program that is TANF-funded and would then be eligible for SNAP through the broad-based categorical eligibility pathway. Because broad-based categorical eligibility conveys SNAP to households with gross incomes as high as 200% of poverty, there is concern that it could be unduly expanding the program. However, broad-based categorical eligibility has not resulted in large numbers of households receiving SNAP who have gross incomes, as measured using SNAP income counting rules, exceeding 130% of poverty. Table 2 shows that in FY2016, a monthly average of 4.2% of all households without an elderly or disabled member had incomes above 130% of poverty. (As mentioned above, households with an elderly or disabled member are not subject to the 130% of poverty gross income limit under regular federal eligibility rules.) Table 3 shows both the number and percentage of households without an elderly or disabled member that have incomes above 130% of poverty by state. Note that tabulations in Table 2 and Table 3 reflect states' SNAP households under states' broad-based categorical eligibility practices in place during FY2016. Some states' current practices are different from their practices in FY2016, so tabulations here do not necessarily reflect current state practices. As discussed above, broad-based categorical eligibility also eliminates the SNAP asset test in many states. Since states that do not administer an asset test generally do not collect data on the assets of SNAP households, it is not possible to determine the extent to which broad-based categorical eligibility has resulted in households with assets above the usual SNAP limit receiving benefits. Neither of the last two farm bills ultimately included changes to categorical eligibility rules. The enacted 2014 Farm Bill ( P.L. 113-79 ) did not change categorical eligibility, although the House-passed version would have eliminated broad-based categorical eligibility. Also, and more recently, the enacted 2018 Farm Bill ( P.L. 115-334 ) did not make changes, although the House-passed bill proposed some. The 115 th Congress House-passed policy is discussed further below. The House-passed bill, the Agriculture and Nutrition Act of 2018 ( H.R. 2 , as passed June 21, 2018) would have made changes to limit but not eliminate broad-based categorical eligibility. Debate during the House Committee on Agriculture's April 18, 2018, markup was substantially focused on the bill's SNAP provisions, including the changes to categorical eligibility. The Senate-passed bill, Agriculture Improvement Act of 2018 ( H.R. 2 , as passed June 28, 2018) would not have made any changes to categorical eligibility. Section 4006 of H.R. 2 , as passed by the House, would have changed broad-based categorical eligibility in a few ways. In states with broad-based options in place, some but not all households would be affected by this change. Under the proposal, To be categorically eligible, households would have had to receive SSI, state general assistance, or "cash assistance or ongoing and substantial services" through a state program funded by TANF. While these terms would be subject to implementation, it was to be expected that a brochure may not meet this more specific TANF-funded benefit. There would have been two gross income limits for broad-based categorical eligibility: 1. Households with an elderly or disabled member must be at or below 200% of the federal poverty line. 2. Households without an elderly or disabled member must be at or below 130% of the federal poverty line. Households meeting respective gross income limits and receiving a TANF-funded benefit or other benefit that conveys categorical eligibility would not have had to meet the law's asset tests. The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimated that the amendments to categorical eligibility in the House committee's reported bill would reduce SNAP spending by $5.035 billion dollars over 10 years (FY2019-FY2028). CBO also estimated that in an average year, about 400,000 households would lose SNAP eligibility. As SNAP recipients are also eligible for free school meals, CBO estimated that in an average year, 265,000 children would lose access to free meals. On the House floor, Section 4006 of the reported bill was amended by H.Amdt. 606 to include a later implementation date, October 1, 2020, so the House-passed bill's cost and participation estimates could be different than those of the reported bill. As discussed earlier, the current "broad-based" categorical eligibility state option is in part created by USDA Food and Nutrition Service regulations finalized in 2000. In the Fall 2018 Unified Agenda, the Trump Administration indicated plans to change these regulations. In the Fall 2018 Unified Agenda, the Administration stated that it plans to publish a proposed rule "pertaining to categorically eligible TANF households by limiting categorical eligibility to households that receive cash TANF or other substantial assistance from TANF." As of the date of this report, the proposed rule has not yet been published. The Unified Agenda exists primarily for transparency and is not binding on agencies, meaning that the Administration could still change its plans for moving forward with the proposed rule. One question will be how substantial assistance would be defined, since the TANF block grant can fund an array of programs and services. The plan indicates that "categorical eligibility conferred by any non-cash assistance would be limited to substantial ongoing assistance or services, such as child care, that have an eligibility determination process similar to cash TANF." Like the farm bill proposals discussed above, the change is expected to leave "traditional" categorical eligibility in place. The Unified Agenda entry says, "This rule would not alter categorical eligibility for Supplemental Security Income (SSI) households or General Assistance (GA) households."

Summary: The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) provides benefits to low-income, eligible households on an electronic benefit transfer (EBT) card; benefits can then be exchanged for foods at authorized retailers. SNAP reaches a large share of low-income households. In FY2018, a monthly average of 40.3 million persons in 20.1 million households participated in SNAP. Federal SNAP law provides two basic pathways for financial eligibility to the program: (1) meeting program-specific federal eligibility requirements; or (2) being automatically or "categorically" eligible for SNAP based on being eligible for or receiving benefits from other specified low-income assistance programs. Categorical eligibility eliminated the requirement that households who already met financial eligibility rules in one specified low-income program go through another financial eligibility determination in SNAP. In its traditional form, categorical eligibility conveys SNAP eligibility based on household receipt of cash assistance from Supplemental Security Income (SSI), the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) block grant, or state-run General Assistance (GA) programs. However, since the 1996 welfare reform law, states have been able to expand categorical eligibility beyond its traditional bounds. That law created TANF to replace the Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) program, which was a traditional cash assistance program. TANF is a broad-purpose block grant that finances a wide range of social and human services. TANF gives states flexibility in meeting its goals, resulting in a wide variation of benefits and services offered among the states. SNAP allows states to convey categorical eligibility based on receipt of a TANF "benefit," not just TANF cash welfare. This provides states with the ability to convey categorical eligibility based on a wide range of benefits and services. TANF benefits other than cash assistance typically are available to a broader range of households and at higher levels of income than are TANF cash assistance benefits. As of October 2018, 43 jurisdictions have implemented what the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) has called "broad-based" categorical eligibility. These jurisdictions generally make all households with incomes below a state-determined income threshold eligible for SNAP. States do this by providing households with a low-cost TANF-funded benefit or service such as a brochure or referral to a telephone hotline. There are varying income eligibility thresholds within states that convey "broad-based" categorical eligibility, though no state has a gross income limit above 200% of the federal poverty guidelines. In all but six of these jurisdictions, there is no asset test required for SNAP eligibility. Categorically eligible families bypass the regular SNAP asset limits. However, their net incomes (income after deductions for expenses) must still be low enough to qualify for a SNAP benefit. That is, it is possible to be categorically eligible for SNAP but have net income too high to actually receive a benefit. The exception to this is one- or two-person households that would still receive the minimum benefit. Neither the Agriculture Act of 2014 ("2014 Farm Bill," P.L. 113-79) nor the Agriculture Improvement Act of 2018 ("2018 Farm Bill," P.L. 115-334) made changes to SNAP categorical eligibility rules. In the 113th Congress, the House-passed version of the 2014 law would have eliminated broad-based categorical eligibility, but that change was not included in the conference agreement. In the 115th Congress, the House-passed version of the 2018 law would have made changes to limit but not eliminate broad-based categorical eligibility; these changes were not included in the conference agreement. In the Fall 2018 Unified Agenda, the Trump Administration included plans to publish a proposed rule that would amend SNAP categorical eligibility rules. As of the date this report, this proposed rule has not yet been published.