The psychological health of active duty servicemembers has been an issue of significant concern for Congress in recent years, with particular attention to the links between deployments and psychological health concerns, such as post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). News stories have emphasized the challenges faced by some servicemembers returning from deployments, but psychological health is a salient issue for the entire active duty force. It should also be pointed out that mental health issues are not unique to servicemembers or military service. Research suggests that an estimated 26.2% of Americans ages 18 and older experience a diagnosable mental disorder in any given year. Within the Department of Defense (DOD), the Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense (Health Affairs) is primarily responsible for the medical aspects of mental health issues. The individual military services (Army, Navy, Marine Corps, and Air Force) also conduct a variety of mental health programs and suicide prevention efforts. In 2012, a Defense Suicide Prevention Office was opened to provide suicide prevention services across all the services. This report will discuss the prevalence of different psychological health concerns within the Armed Forces, current mental health screening and treatments, and DOD responses. It will also provide an overview of the recommendations of key reports and studies, past congressional actions and funding, and current issues for Congress. Finally, the report discusses specific mental health issues, including PTSD, alcohol and drug use disorders, depressive disorders, traumatic brain injury, and suicide in more detail. This report does not address veterans. Veteran's mental health issues are addressed in CRS Reports CRS Report R41921, Mental Disorders Among OEF/OIF Veterans Using VA Health Care: Facts and Figures , by [author name scrubbed], CRS Report R40941, Traumatic Brain Injury Among Veterans , by [author name scrubbed], and CRS Report R42340, Suicide Prevention Efforts of the Veterans Health Administration , by [author name scrubbed]. Overall, mental health disorders have significant impacts on servicemember health care utilization, disability, and attrition from service. In 2011, mental disorders accounted for more hospitalizations of servicemembers than any other illness and more outpatient care than all illnesses except musculoskeletal injuries and routine medical care. Between 2001 and 2011, the rate of mental health diagnoses among active duty servicemembers increased approximately 65%. A total of 936,283 servicemembers, or former servicemembers during their period of service, have been diagnosed with at least one mental disorder over this time period (see Figure 1 ). Nearly 49% of these servicemembers were diagnosed with more than one mental disorder. Between 2000 and 2011, diagnoses of adjustment disorders, depression, and anxiety disorders (excluding PTSD) made up 26%, 17%, and 10% of all diagnoses of mental disorder diagnoses. Alcohol abuse and dependence disorders, and substance abuse and dependence disorders made up 13% and 4%, respectively. PTSD represented approximately 6% of mental disorder diagnoses over this time period. (See Figure 2 .) The rates of specific mental disorders have also changed dramatically between 2000 and 2011. The reported incidence of PTSD has increased approximately 650%, from about 170 diagnoses per 100,000 person years in 2000, to approximately 1,110 diagnoses per 100,000 person years in 2011. The incidence of anxiety, adjustment disorders, and depression diagnoses has also increased. By contrast, the incidence of alcohol abuse/dependence, schizophrenia, and personality disorders fell. (See Table 1 , Figure 3 .) Among the services, the Army, followed by the Marine Corps, has consistently had the highest incidence rates for PTSD, major depression, alcohol dependence, and substance dependence between 2007 and 2010, followed by the Navy and the Air Force. (See Figure 4 .) Hospitalizations for mental health mental disorders were steady between 2000 and 2006, before increasing more than 50% from 2006 through 2009, from 10,262 to 15,328. This increase in hospitalizations was driven by sharp increases in hospitalization for PTSD, depression, and substance abuse. Calculated by lost duty time, the Army has been the service most affected by hospitalizations of active duty servicemembers for mental disorders, followed by the Marine Corps. (See Figure 5 .) TBI has been considered a "signature injury" of the conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan. However, approximately 80% of servicemember TBIs occur in a non-deployed setting. Common causes of TBI include vehicle crashes, falls, sports and recreation activities, and military training. Since 2001, it is reported that servicemembers have experienced about 255,852 TBIs, including approximately 212,741 incidences of mild TBI, approximately 20,168 incidences of moderate TBI, approximately 6,472 incidences of severe TBI/penetrating head injuries, and 16,471 unclassifiable TBIs. Incidents of mild TBI rose sharply between 2005 and 2007, due in part to more aggressive screening measures for mild TBI instituted in 2006. (See Figure 7 .) Diagnoses of TBI in deployed settings nearly doubled between 2010 and 2011, due in part to a greater focus on identifying and treating TBIs among deployed servicemembers. Beginning in 2010, suicide has been the second-leading cause of death for active duty servicemembers, behind only war injuries. Researchers have suggested that, similar to suicides among civilians, suicides by servicemembers are often impulsive acts triggered by various stressors, including relationship problems and financial or legal problems. Suicides among the active duty forces have increased between 1998 and 2012, rising from approximately 200 deaths by suicide in 1998 to 349 in 2012. Between 1998 and 2011, the incidence rate of deaths by suicide for active duty servicemembers overall was approximately 14 per 100,000 person years. Most of the increase in suicide rates between 2000 and 2011 has been concentrated in the Army and Marine Corps. Between 2005 and 2009, the incidence of suicide has nearly doubled for Army and Marine personnel, while remaining approximately level for Navy and Air Force personnel. In 2011, the suicide rate for Army personnel was approximately 23 per 100,000, while the rates for the Navy and Marine Corps were approximately 15 per 100,000 and the rate for the Air Force was approximately 13 per 100,000. While the rates of suicide in the Armed Forces overall have increased between 1998 and 2011, the rates for active duty servicemembers overall remain lower than for comparable civilian populations. Lower suicide rates among the Armed Forces have been attributed to a variety of factors, including the servicemember's full-time employment; "healthy-worker" effects, including a sense of belonging and purpose among active duty servicemembers; and universal access to health care among the military population. Accession into the uniformed services provides an opportunity to screen potential servicemembers for potential behavioral health issues. Certain learning, behavioral, and psychological conditions are considered disqualifying for military service. However, there is no required battery of psychological tests for accessions into the military other than the learning and behavioral questions on the Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery (ASVAB). During the course of the history and physical that every recruit is required to complete, specific questions and other methods are utilized to evoke potential markers of psychological and behavioral dysfunction potentially incompatible with military service. Since 2009, the Supplemental Health Screening Questionnaire has augmented the standard Report of Medical History (DD 2807-2). This form includes 12 queries regarding past history of psychiatric, psychological, or behavioral issues as well as questions regarding substance abuse. Any condition reported or elucidated during the examination that does not meet the Department of Defense Instruction (DODI) 6130.03: Accession Medical Standard is considered disqualifying. Each service has the authority to waive the standard on a case by case basis. According to data provided by DOD from the U.S. Military Entrance Processing Command's database, out of 296,000 accessions in fiscal year 2009, a total of 11,845 accessions with medical waivers were granted. Of these, 1,178 were accessions with mental health conditions, of which 127 were for anxiety, 32 for depression, 182 for personality disorder, and 19 for PTSD. In addition, during the physical examination portion of accession medical evaluation, evidence of self-harm, mutilation, or excessive or otherwise inappropriate tattooing or piercings, among other physical findings, would lead the examiner to evaluate the recruit further for psychological problems or maladaptive behavior. In any of the above situations, reasonable suspicion on the part of the examiner that the recruit may manifest psychological or behavior health conditions incompatible with service would be referred for further psychological evaluation and if found unfit, would be subjected to the decision of the individual service to exercise its waiver authority. The study of the effects of prior psychological and behavioral health issues on successful military service is ongoing. Multiple forms of additional screening tools have and are being piloted, however, to date, the requisite data to determine if these tools have any predictive value in determining the ability of a recruit to complete a successful tour of duty are still outstanding. Servicemembers are required to receive an annual physical examination known as a periodic health assessment (PHA). The PHA is intended to identify changes in health status, including mental health changes, especially those that could impact a member's ability to perform military duties. Servicemembers who are deployed in connection with a contingency operation are required to receive face-to-face mental health assessments conducted by mental health professionals . Separate assessments are required at four separate times: within 120 days before the estimated date of deployment, between 90 and 180 days after return from deployment, between 181 days and 18 months after return from deployment, and between 18 and 30 months after return from deployment. Assessments must be administered at least 90 days apart. The following conditions are cited as limiting deployability, meaning an individual diagnosed with these conditions may not deploy: (1) Psychotic and/or bipolar disorders; (2) Psychiatric disorders under treatment with fewer than 3 months of demonstrated stability; (3) Clinical psychiatric disorders with residual symptoms that impair duty performance; (4) Mental health conditions that pose a substantial risk for deterioration and/or recurrence of impairing symptoms in the deployed environment; and (5) Chronic medical conditions that require ongoing treatment with antipsychotics, lithium, or anticonvulsants. Servicemembers on active duty are covered by DOD's TRICARE Prime health insurance program. Under this program servicemembers receive free health care without any copayments, deductibles, or premiums. Servicemembers typically receive most of their health care in a military treatment facility but may be referred to private providers for specialty care or if insufficient providers are available on base. Prior authorization is not required for services received through a military treatment facility but is required for all nonemergency inpatient behavioral health care services. Psychiatric emergencies do not require prior authorization, but authorization is required for continued stay in the facility beyond the initial emergency. The Telemental Health program is available to all U.S. TRICARE beneficiaries. At Telemental Health-participating TRICARE facilities, secure audio-visual conferencing is available to connect with off-site mental health care providers. TRICARE covers medical treatments that DOD has deemed to be proven safe and effective by reliable evidence as defined in regulation. TRICARE excludes from coverage services and supplies that are not medically or psychologically necessary for the diagnosis or treatment of a covered illness (including mental disorder) or injury. It also excludes treatments that are not proven medically. All services related to a non-covered condition or treatment, or provided by an unauthorized provider, are also excluded from coverage. Authorized providers of mental health care include psychiatrists, clinical psychologists, certified marriage and family therapists, certified nurse practitioners, and certified clinical social workers. Certain services otherwise not covered by TRICARE may, in certain circumstances, be provided through the DOD Supplemental Health Care Program. This program is not subject to the statutory TRICARE coverage limitations and has been used, for example, to provide cognitive therapy to TBI patients. Active duty servicemembers may receive treatment from military mental health providers as well as federal civilian and contractor mental health providers. In some circumstances active duty servicemembers also may be referred outside of military treatment facilities to private providers. Mental health providers include psychiatrists, psychologists, social workers, licensed mental health counselors, and psychiatric nurse practitioners. Concerns about the potential for servicemembers to lack appropriate access to mental health care due to insufficient numbers of mental health providers led to legislation mandating that DOD develop and implement a plan to significantly increase the number of DOD military and civilian mental health personnel by September 30, 2013. Overall, Defense Health Program personnel has increased, with officer end strength growing from 31,244 in fiscal year 2012 to a projected 31,852 for fiscal year 2014 and from 64,236 civilian personnel to 67,577 over the same period. The 2014 budget request specifically includes an increase of $21 million to fund expansion of embedded behavioral health (EBH) teams in the Army to 19 Army installations world-wide. EBH teams are composed of 13 civilian behavioral health personnel and provide behavioral health care to servicemembers in close proximity to their unit areas. The intent is to optimize care and maximize behavioral health resources through early identification of servicemembers with behavioral health problems. Treatment of servicemembers is generally provided by either civilian or military mental health care providers working in a military treatment facility. Their treatment decisions typically are made following clinical practice guidelines. DOD and the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) have worked together to develop joint clinical practice guidelines, including, among others, guidelines for PTSD, TBI, depression, and substance abuse disorder. The VA/DOD Evidence-Based Practice Guideline Work Group (EBPWG) was established to advise the VA/DOD Health Executive Council on the use of clinical and epidemiological evidence to improve the health of the population across the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) and Military Health System. The EBPWG has two co-chairpersons (one from VA and one from DOD) and includes representatives for each military branch and the VHA Veterans Integrated Service Networks (VISN). The workgroup was first chartered in 2004. It continues to refine existing guidelines as circumstances require and develop new clinical practice guidelines. Concern has been expressed that servicemembers may underreport mental health conditions as a result of stigma attached to seeking treatment for those conditions. DOD has issued instructions to all heads of DOD components stating: It is DOD policy that: a. The DOD shall foster a culture of support in the provision of mental health care and voluntarily sought substance abuse education to military personnel in order to dispel the stigma of seeking mental health care and/or substance misuse education services. b. Healthcare providers shall follow a presumption that they are not to notify a Service member's commander when the Service member obtains mental health care or substance abuse education services. This policy further requires that "Commanders must also reduce stigma through positive regard for those who seek mental health assistance to restore and maintain their mission readiness, just as they would view someone seeking treatment for any other medical issue." Efforts to address the stigma issue may be, at least in part, responsible for greater rates of mental health diagnoses. The Armed Forces Health Surveillance Center stated that: The Department of Defense has made significant efforts to reduce stigmas associated with care seeking for, and treatment of, mental illnesses and to remove barriers to receiving timely and appropriate diagnostic and treatment services. Undoubtedly, such changes have resulted in increases in the detection and treatment of previously undiagnosed mental disorders and more complete documentation of mental disorders in electronic medical records. Nevertheless, the Mental Health Advisory Teams report a stable response pattern over the years among junior enlisted servicemembers to questions regarding factors that affect an individual's decision to receive mental health services, with over 30% of individuals screening positive for mental disorders reporting fear of harm to career. Many active duty servicemembers and activated Guard and Reserve members seek mental disorder treatment through the military health care system. Between FY2007 and FY2012, the costs to the military health system of providing mental disorder treatments to active duty servicemembers and activated Guard and Reserve members has nearly doubled, increasing from about $468 million in FY2007 to about $994 million in FY2012. (See Figure 8 .) These numbers include mental disorder treatment costs for all active duty and activated Guard and Reserve members. Costs for mental disorder treatments for servicemembers while deployed are not available. In FY2012, the military medical system spent nearly $1 billion on mental disorder treatment costs for active duty and activated Guard and Reserve members. Over half of these costs, about $567 million, were for outpatient active duty mental health treatments. Overall, approximately 63% of mental disorder treatment costs were for outpatient treatment, 31% for in-patient treatment, and 7% for pharmacy costs. Mental disorder treatment for active duty servicemembers accounted for 89% of military health care spending on mental disorder treatment between FY2007 and FY2012, approximately $4 billion. Over the same time frame, the military health system spent about $461 million on mental health care treatment for activated Guard and Reserve members. (See Figure 9 .) Not all costs of active duty and activated Reserve and Guard mental health treatment will appear in this chart, as not all servicemembers seek mental disorder treatment through the military health system. Deactivated Guard and Reserve members are covered by the Transitional Assistance Management Program for 180 days. Following this 180 days, deactivated Guard and Reserve members may be eligible to purchase TRICARE Reserve Select coverage. Those ineligible to purchase TRICARE Reserve Select may be eligible to purchase the Continued Health Care Benefit Program, which can provide benefits for up to 18 or 36 months, depending on eligibility. DOD and the services have implemented a number of programs and strategies to promote psychological resilience among servicemembers. "Psychological resilience" is understood to be the ability to bounce back from negative experiences. It is thought to be related to an individual's ability to avoid experiencing diagnosable mental health conditions. However, a RAND study reported that "there is very little empirical evidence that these programs effectively build resilience." With respect to suicide, "DOD and each service have a myriad of activities currently in place to prevent suicides." To better coordinate these efforts, DOD has created a Defense Suicide Prevention Office to oversee cross-service programs. These programs include (1) a DOD Suicide Prevention and Risk Reduction Committee that meets monthly, (2) the Real Warriors Campaign, a public education initiative to address the stigma of seeking psychological care and treatment, (3) the Department of Defense Suicide Event Report (DoDSER), and (4) annual suicide-prevention conferences. In addition, the services each have a suicide prevention program manager to oversee service-specific programs. However, here too empirical evidence for the efficacy of these programs is limited. One recent study stated that the "quality of mental health care and counseling offered in DOD is unknown, and efforts to improve quality, such as training providers in evidence-based practice, are not integrated into the system of mental health care offered in DOD treatment facilities." The Defense Centers of Excellence for Psychological Health and Traumatic Brain Injury (DCOE) was established in 2007 to focus on prevention, outreach, and care for servicemembers with psychological health conditions, including TBI. The DCOE for Psychological Health and Traumatic Brain Injury are intended to be principal integrators and authorities on psychological health and traumatic brain injury knowledge and standards for DOD. There are three centers under the DCOE: the Defense and Veterans Brain Injury Center, the Deployment Health Clinical Center, and the National Center for Telehealth and Technology. Support responsibility for DCOE is currently shifting from the TRICARE Management Activity office to the Army's Medical Research and Materiel Command. A key project of the DCOE centers in 2013 will be "determining the impact of mental health programs across the military." A number of reports have made recommendations that Congress could build upon in fashioning legislation or conducting oversight. These reports include in reverse chronological order: The Institute of Medicine (IOM) published the results of the first phase of a two-part study titled "Treatment for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) in Military and Veteran Populations" in July 2012. The IOM report concluded with seven general recommendations, in five major areas, for further areas of research and service. The report findings were summarized by the DOD as: History, Diagnostic Criteria, and Epidemiology — Servicemembers that served in OEF/OIF/OND appear to have a 13%-20% lifetime prevalence of PTSD. In contrast, the unadjusted general population lifetime prevalence of PTSD in adults appears to be 8%; Neurobiology — Further research is needed to identify biomarkers of PTSD, brain imaging diagnostic models, and effective pharmacologic agents to enhance therapy-related learning; Programs and Services for PTSD in the DO D and VA — Both the DOD and VA have a played an active and pivotal role in the prevention, screening, diagnosis, and treatment of PTSD; however, further evaluation is needed to identify the effectiveness of these efforts; Prevention — DOD supports several PTSD prevention programs that build resiliency and teach servicemembers to anticipate some of the traumatic events commonly experienced in combat zones; Screening and Diagnosis — Screening measures for PTSD are essential to the identification of servicemembers and veterans that need treatment. DOD currently utilizes screening tools, but needs to ensure that every servicemember identified through such screening methods is referred to trained professionals that can provide comprehensive assessments, diagnosis, and treatment; Treatment — The VA/DOD clinical practice guidelines for the management of PTSD make specific suggestions concerning treatment of PTSD symptoms. IOM recognizes that DOD offers numerous treatments for PTSD, and continues to develop additional treatment methods; and Co-occurring Psychiatric and Medical Conditions and Psychosocial Complexities — Given the presence of co-occurring conditions in more than 50% of OEF/OIF/OND veterans, IOM recommends evidence-based PTSD models to ensure the success of PTSD treatment for comorbid conditions. DOD generally concurred with the IOM report recommendations and findings. In Phase 2 of its study, the IOM will analyze barriers to care and ways to improve access to high-quality care for servicemembers and veterans. The RAND National Defense Research Institute released a study entitled "The War Within, Preventing Suicide in the U.S. Military" in February 2011. The War Within report made 14 recommendations in 6 categories: 1. Raise Awareness and Promote Self-Care; 2. Identify Those at High Risk; 3. Facilitate Access to High-Quality Care; 4. Provide High-Quality Care; 5. Restrict Access to Lethal Means; and 6. Respond Appropriately. Section 733 of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 ( P.L. 110-417 ) required the Secretary of Defense to establish a Task Force "to examine matters relating to prevention of suicide by members of the Armed Forces." The DOD Task Force on the Prevention of Suicide by Members of the Armed Forces was established in August 2009, and was composed of seven DOD and seven non-DOD members. In August 2010, the Task Force issued a document entitled "The Challenge and the Promise: Strengthening the Force, Preventing Suicide and Saving Lives" that listed 49 findings and 76 associated recommendations. The Task Force's report did not address the earlier Army report described below. The findings fall into four areas: Organization and Leadership; Wellness Enhancement and Training; Access to, and Delivery of, Quality Care; and Surveillance, Investigations, and Research. In July 2010, the Department of the Army issued a document entitled "Health Promotion, Risk Reduction, and Suicide Prevention (HP/RR/SP) Report" (hereinafter referred to as "the Army Report") that listed 67 specific conclusions and recommendations. Among the Army Report's major findings was discovering gaps in the identification and mitigation of high-risk behavior among soldiers. The report attributed these gaps to an operational tempo that required leadership focus on deployment rather than the enforcement of policies designed to ensure good order and discipline. The Army Report's recommendations were addressed to specific audiences, including Army Headquarters (HQDA), the Medical Command (MEDCOM), and Unit Commanders and are organized by themes. Recommendations addressed to HQDA appear most amenable to congressional action. Since 2003, DOD has deployed a series of teams to Iraq and Afghanistan to evaluate soldiers' psychological health in theater, the results of which are published as publicly available reports. The sixth, and most recent, of these Mental Health Advisory Teams (MHAT VI) to report worked in Iraq from February to March 2009 and in Afghanistan from April to June 2009. The teams included research psychologists, a social worker, a psychiatric nurse, and enlisted behavioral-health specialists. The reports have made numerous recommendations, including to continue the "funding of basic-research models of concussive and traumatic brain injury work to advance the development of novel evidence-based interventions" that would require continuing congressional action in the form of appropriations. Executive Order 13625, "Improving Access to Mental Health Services for Veterans, Service Members, and Military Families," issued on August 31, 2012, contained a number of provisions designed to increase access to and the quality of mental health care for active duty servicemembers, including establishing an interagency task force with an annual reporting requirement as well as providing for increased mental health care staffing within the Department of Veterans Affairs. With respect to broadly applicable issues, Executive Order 13625 provides for a National Research Action Plan, stating: Sec. 5. Improved Research and Development. (a) The lack of full understanding of the underlying mechanisms of PostTraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), other mental health conditions, and Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) has hampered progress in prevention, diagnosis, and treatment. In order to improve the coordination of agency research into these conditions and reduce the number of affected men and women through better prevention, diagnosis, and treatment, the Departments of Defense, Veterans Affairs, Health and Human Services, and Education, in coordination with the Office of Science and Technology Policy, shall establish a National Research Action Plan within 8 months of the date of this order. (b) The National Research Action Plan shall include strategies to establish surrogate and clinically actionable biomarkers for early diagnosis and treatment effectiveness; develop improved diagnostic criteria for TBI; enhance our understanding of the mechanisms responsible for PTSD, related injuries, and neurological disorders following TBI; foster development of new treatments for these conditions based on a better understanding of the underlying mechanisms; improve data sharing between agencies and academic and industry researchers to accelerate progress and reduce redundant efforts without compromising privacy; and make better use of electronic health records to gain insight into the risk and mitigation of PTSD, TBI, and related injuries. In addition, the National Research Action Plan shall include strategies to support collaborative research to address suicide prevention. (c) The Departments of Defense and Health and Human Services shall engage in a comprehensive longitudinal mental health study with an emphasis on PTSD, TBI, and related injuries to develop better prevention, diagnosis, and treatment options. Agencies shall continue ongoing collaborative research efforts, with an aim to enroll at least 100,000 service members by December 31, 2012, and include a plan for long term follow up with enrollees through a coordinated effort with the Department of Veterans Affairs. In addition to funding via the Defense Health Program, Congress has also allocated significant funding to research in these issues through the Congressionally-Directed Research Program. There are no specific line items in the DOD budget request for suicide prevention or PTSD. Generally PTSD treatment and research costs are included in the Defense Health Program operations and maintenance (O&M) appropriation. Suicide prevention funds are included in the services' management accounts. Therefore, it is not possible to provide complete totals for all funding that may be directed to these purposes. The Congressionally Directed Medical Research Programs' Psychological Health and Traumatic Brain Injury (PH/TBI) Research Program (formerly called Post Traumatic Stress Disorder and Traumatic Brain Injury Research Program) was established in 2007 in response to U.S. Troop Readiness, Veterans' Care, Katrina Recovery, and Iraq Accountability Appropriations Act, P.L. 110-28 , which provided $150 million (M) for research on PTSD and $150M for research on TBI. An additional $1M was provided for research on PTSD in P.L. 109-289 . As discussed elsewhere in the report and as listed in Appendix B , numerous laws have been enacted with provisions intended to address military mental health issues. These efforts include provisions to improve screening for mental health conditions and TBI, and providing for additional mental health providers, improved reporting, and continued research. While Congress has taken significant interest in issues related to the psychological health of the active duty forces, including PTSD, alcohol and substance abuse, depression, traumatic brain injury, and other mental health concerns, significant areas for potential congressional oversight remain. These include: The physical manifestations in the brain of mental health conditions, including PTSD, are poorly understood. Further research is needed to identify biomarkers, brain imaging, diagnostic models, and effective pharmacologic agents to enhance therapy-related learning. In conducting its oversight activities, Congress may wish to monitor ongoing research efforts for significant findings with implications for current mental health strategies, as well as consider whether there are gaps in research being conducted into the causes, biomarkers, and translational research for improved treatments. Screening measures for mental health conditions and TBI are essential to the identification of servicemembers and veterans that need treatment. DOD uses screening tools, but many observers recommend greater involvement of primary care providers in this process. Once servicemembers are identified as having potential diagnoses, oversight may be needed to assure they will be referred to trained professionals that can provide comprehensive assessments, diagnosis, and evidence-based treatment. Given the presence of co-occurring conditions in more than 50% of OEF/OIF/OND veterans, the IOM has recommended evidence-based models to ensure the success of treatments for comorbid conditions. In conducting its oversight activities, Congress may wish to consider how the efficacy of treatment is monitored and evaluated. Although Congress has provided resources allowing DOD to expand its pool of military mental health providers, Congress may wish to determine how DOD is responding to Institute of Medicine (IOM) findings expressing "serious misgivings about inadequate and untimely clinical follow-up and low rates of delivery of evidence based treatments, especially therapies to treat PTSD, depression, and substance use disorder. There are scant data documenting which treatments patients receive or whether those treatments were appropriate and timely." Congress may also wish to examine the question of whether DOD is ensuring optimal means of access to and assignment of mental health care providers. Congress may also wish to examine the effectiveness of DOD initiatives to encourage servicemembers to seek care, and reduce the stigma of seeking mental health care. Congress may wish to examine the appropriateness of DOD's response to RAND study findings that the two most evidence-supported suicide prevention strategies are (1) training primary care physicians to assess servicemembers for depression or other risk factors for suicide, and (2) restricting servicemembers' access to lethal means, primarily private firearms. As discussed above, Executive Order 16325 requires a special interagency task force to evaluate: agency efforts to improve care quality and ensure that DOD and VA providers and community based mental health providers are trained in the most current evidence based methodologies for treating PTSD, TBI, depression, related mental health conditions, and substance abuse; agency efforts to improve awareness and reduce stigma for those needing to seek care; and agency research efforts to improve the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of TBI, PTSD, and related injuries, and explore the need for an external research portfolio review. Congress may wish to be apprised of these evaluation efforts. In addition, Congress may consider whether additional oversight is necessary in areas such as: The allocation of resources between research, treatment, oversight, types of providers, provider to program staffing; and The efficacy of entities such as the DCOE for Psychological Health and Traumatic Brain Injury. DOD's spending on mental health care treatment has increased, as the number of active duty servicemembers receiving diagnoses of mental health conditions and seeking treatment for these conditions has increased. Congress may wish to examine the role of supplying larger amounts of mental health care in the context of the Defense Health Program (DHP) appropriation since growth in the unified medical budget relative to the overall Defense budget has been identified by some senior leaders as unsustainable. Although this report has addressed only the issues of active duty mental health, Congress may well be interested in examining the implications of DOD's programs as they relate to the long-term costs experienced in the various programs administered by the VA. Within the active duty forces, psychological health issues include diagnosed mental disorders, such as depression or PTSD, as well as other mental health problems, such as problems with personal relationships or family circumstances. Other mental health issues facing the Armed Forces include traumatic brain injuries (TBI) and the suicides of servicemembers. Mental health issues in the active duty force have an impact not only on the individual servicemembers and their families, but also on the services as a whole. In this report, much of the data comes from past issues of the Medical Surveillance Monthly Report , a publication of DOD's Armed Forces Health Surveillance Center. The Armed Forces Health Surveillance Center (AFHSC) data include diagnoses received by servicemembers though the military medical system while on active duty service. The AFHSC data are the most complete and reliable data on servicemember diagnoses of mental health conditions, however, they likely represent the lower bound of actual servicemember incidences of diagnosable mental health disorders. These data do not include servicemembers who may experience mental health problems but who do not seek treatment for them at a fixed military medical or reimbursable civilian location. Accordingly, these data likely underestimate the true incidence and prevalence numbers and rates among active duty servicemembers of the U.S. Armed Forces. Additionally, these data will likely not capture Reserve and Guard servicemembers who seek mental health treatment after they are deactivated. The underlying database used by the Armed Forces Health Surveillance Center is the Defense Medical Surveillance System. This database includes ambulatory visits and hospitalizations at fixed military medical and reimbursed civilian locations by servicemembers while on active duty, but does not include medical encounters at non-fixed locations. Medical encounters outside of fixed locations, such as care received in deployed settings or shipboard, are not routinely entered into the Defense Medical Surveillance System, and are thus not available for analysis. These Armed Forces Health Surveillance Center data are of diagnoses of selected mental disorders, rather than continued care for diagnosed mental disorders. Incidence cases were generally defined as one hospitalization, two outpatient visits for the same diagnostic coding within 180 days, or a single outpatient visit in a psychiatric or mental health care specialty setting where the mental disorder was the primary or second diagnosis. Diagnostic codes of the selected mental disorders used to assemble the data are included in Appendix A . A servicemember was counted only once for each mental disorder during the surveillance period, although they may have been counted as a unique case for more than one of the mental disorders. Since many individuals have more than one diagnosis, the total of the number of diagnoses does not reflect the actual number of individual servicemembers who have been diagnosed. In considering relative numbers of diagnoses over time, it may also be useful to keep in mind that although there were 1,425,113 active duty servicemembers as of September 31, 2011 (at the end date of most of the time series data presented), over fiscal years 2001 through 2011, the total number of individuals who left military service since September 11, 2001, is estimated to be 1,790,290. The methodology used by the Armed Forces Health Surveillance Center is different from that used in other studies frequently reported in the news media and elsewhere, therefore the results are not directly comparable. Data caveats may apply to other studies as well and in many instances may be discussed in the article or study itself. (Please see text box below for an explanation.) According to current diagnostic criteria for PTSD ( see text box, below ), a person must experience a traumatic event involving death or serious injury, or a threat to the physical integrity of self or others, and react to the trauma with intense horror, fear, or helplessness. Sometime after that trauma, the person must also develop symptoms that cause clinically significant distress or impairment lasting for more than one month. Those symptoms must include symptoms from each of the following three symptom clusters: Reexperiencing the traumatic event, such as having recurring and distressing recollections or nightmares; Avoidance of stimuli associated with the trauma, such as thoughts, feelings, and conversations, along with diminished responsiveness and loss of interest in activities; and Hyperarousal, such as irritability, anger, hypervigilance, insomnia, or difficulty with concentration. The formal DSM-IV-TR diagnostic criteria are below: Acute PTSD occurs when the duration of symptoms is between one and three months. Patients with symptoms extending for more than three months are considered to have chronic PTSD. Delayed-onset PTSD occurs when symptoms begin at least six months after the trauma. These criteria may change with the impending issuance of a DSM-V expected sometime in 2013. In 2010, 5,959 cases of PTSD were diagnosed in active duty servicemembers, a rate of approximately 8.4 new cases per 1,000 servicemembers. Overall, 2% of active duty servicemembers had ever received a PTSD diagnosis. However, the rates of PTSD diagnoses in the Army and Marine Corps were much higher than for servicemembers in the Air Force and the Navy. In 2010, the incidence rates of new diagnoses of PTSD in the active duty Army and Marine Corps were 14.3 per 1,000 and 9.7 per 1,000, respectively, compared to incidence rates of 3.7 per 1,000 for the Navy and 3.4 per 1,000 for the Air Force. (See Figure 10 .) Estimates of PTSD prevalence vary depending on the methodologies used in developing them, including the means of assessment and the characteristics of the applicable population (e.g., deployment history), among other factors. Additionally, prevalence estimates based on screening tools and reported symptoms, including the pre- and post-deployment health assessments required of all deployed servicemembers, will tend to be higher than those based on the numbers of clinical diagnoses of PTSD. However, rates of PTSD incidence relying solely on PTSD diagnoses will likely underestimate the true prevalence of PTSD among the Armed Forces, given the variety of barriers to mental health treatment that exist. According to the Veterans' Administration, studies have shown that approximately 10%-18% of combat troops serving in Iraq or Afghanistan have probable PTSD after deployment. One study, estimating PTSD prevalence based on post-deployment health assessments and reassessments (conducted 90 and 180 days after return from deployment, between 181 days and 18 months after return from deployment, and between 18 and 30 months after return from deployment), found that that probable PTSD prevalence based on reported symptoms among active duty servicemembers increased from 11.8% to 16.7% between assessments. For reservists and National Guard members, this study found that probable PTSD rates rose from 12.7% to 24.5% by the second assessment. A telephone-based survey of personnel previously deployed to Iraq or Afghanistan found that approximately 14% reported symptoms indicative of probable PTSD. This study found that risk factors for PTSD included Guard or Reserve status, being of the female gender, Hispanic ethnicity, more lengthy deployments, and more extensive exposure to combat. However, as discussed above, these studies relied on reported symptoms to estimate the probable prevalence of PTSD, rather than actual diagnoses of PTSD. By comparison, in the U.S. population as a whole, the proportion of those who have ever experienced PTSD was estimated at 6.8%. The proportion of the U.S. population currently experiencing PTSD was estimated at 3.5%. Between January 1, 2001, and December 3, 2012, a total of 103,792 PTSD cases have been diagnosed in servicemembers who have been deployed for at least 30 days in support of OEF, OIF, or OND, according to DOD data. As Figure 11 indicates, the number of diagnoses is higher among deployed servicemembers than non-deployed servicemembers. As of July 31, 2012, approximately 2,453,036 servicemembers from the active duty, National Guard, and Reserve components have ever deployed to OEF, OIF, and/or OND. Several studies have linked diagnoses of PTSD with factors common in the deployment experience. Specifically, greater combat exposure, length and/or number of deployments, perceived threat of personal danger, and deployment-related physical injuries have been associated with greater PTSD risk among servicemembers deployed to Operation Enduring Freedom, Operation Iraqi Freedom, and/or Operation New Dawn. Other factors, such as perceived preparedness for combat, have also been found to mitigate the link between combat and perceived threat. Additionally, a sense of unit cohesion has been associated with a lower risk of PTSD in OEF/OIF/OND servicemembers. Greater exposure of deployed Army and Marine Corps servicemembers to these aspects of combat, such as greater perceived threat of personal danger or deployment-related physical injuries, could be a factor in the higher rates of PTSD among the Army and Marine Corps, as compared to the Navy and Air Force. Between 2001 and 2012, approximately 80% of PTSD cases among previously deployed servicemembers were diagnosed in active component servicemembers. Approximately 13% of PTSD diagnoses among previously deployed servicemembers were given to National Guard members, while 7% were given to Reserve component members. Two studies of National Guard and Reserve troops found that post-deployment stressors, including economic and relationship difficulties, also appear to be PTSD risk factors for OIF-deployed servicemembers. The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual IV Trial Revision (DSM-IV-TR) uses specific terminology to refer to various categories of diagnoses related to alcohol and substance use. The broadest category is "substance-related disorders," which includes both "substance use disorders" (e.g., alcohol abuse or nicotine dependence) and "substance-induced disorders" (e.g., intoxication or withdrawal). Within the category of "substance use disorders," the DSM-IV-TR distinguishes between "abuse" and "dependence." (See text box below.) Substance-related disorders include dependence on and abuse of drugs, alcohol, or other substances (e.g., nicotine). A diagnosis of dependence requires at least three of seven diagnostic symptoms (e.g., tolerance or withdrawal). Substance use that does not meet criteria for dependence, but leads to clinically significant distress or impairment, is called abuse. Each diagnosis is specific to the substance, so an individual may have multiple diagnoses of abuse or dependence—one for each substance (e.g., marijuana dependence and cocaine abuse). Alcohol-related diagnoses and medical encounters in the active duty forces have increased since 2001, with the sharpest increases since 2007. (See Figure 12 .) Between 2001 and 2010, 190,302 servicemembers had at least one medical encounter where they received an acute alcohol diagnosis, such as drunkenness, excessive blood alcohol content, or alcohol poisoning. Approximately 21% of these were considered recurrent acute cases, with at least three medical encounters with acute alcohol diagnoses. However, over 90% of these recurrent acute cases likely represent treatment encounters, rather than recurrent acute cases. Approximately 4% of all coded acute alcohol diagnoses represent actual recurrent cases. Over the same time period (2001–2010), over 141,000 active duty servicemembers had a medical encounter in which they received a diagnosis connected to alcohol abuse or dependence, such as alcohol abuse or alcoholic liver disease. In a 2008 survey of servicemembers, 47% self-reported as binge drinkers and 5% reported possible dependence. Between 2000 and 2011, drug abuse disorders accounted for 4% of mental disorders diagnosed among the active duty forces, with a total of 73,623 diagnoses. Though rates dipped in 2011, the rate of drug disorder diagnoses had risen between 2000 and 2009. (See Figure 13 .) The increase in substance abuse disorders is often connected to deployment. Incidence rates of cannabis and cocaine use declined, while rates of opioid and "mixed/other" substance abuse increased sharply. (See Figure 14 .) This rise potentially reflects an increase in the misuse of prescription drugs. While overall drug use is lower in the military than civilian populations, prescription drug abuse has recently been increasing at a greater rate in the military than among the civilian population. Substance abuse disorder diagnoses declined with increasing age, time in service, rank, and number of combat deployments. Rates of substance abuse diagnoses were 1.8 times greater among the youngest servicemembers than older servicemembers, while junior enlisted servicemembers had diagnoses of substance abuse disorders at a rate 17.6 times higher than officers. Substance abuse rates were consistently highest in the Army, followed by the Marine Corps. A 2008 health survey of servicemembers found a decrease in illegal drug use since the 2005 survey, but an increase in prescription drug misuse, predominantly prescription pain medication. (See Figure 15 .) Researchers have suggested that these increases in self-reported drug misuse can be partially attributed to improve survey design, as well as to increased deployments and associated diagnoses of pain disorders, PTSD, and other mental disorders. Depression, formally diagnosed as major depressive disorder (see text box) is a mental disorder characterized by episodes of all-encompassing low mood accompanied by low self-esteem and loss of interest or pleasure in normally enjoyable activities. Major depressive disorder is a very common mental disorder in the United States, affecting approximately 16% of adults across their lifetimes, and approximately 6.6% of adults in any 12-month period. In a subset of the overall U.S. population with the same socio-demographic characteristics of the U.S. Army, the estimated prevalence of major depression was 1.3%. Among active duty troops, the prevalence of major depressive disorder for never-deployed troops was estimated at 5.7%, based on a meta-analysis of previous studies. The prevalence of major depressive disorder among currently deployed servicemembers was estimated at 12%, and at approximately 13% for previously deployed servicemembers. One limitation of this analysis was that it was not able to control for those servicemembers who did not respond to surveys or screenings, potentially underrepresenting servicemembers with high risk of mental disorders in the survey data. A second limitation is that the sampling within some of the individual studies over-represented combat units in the Armed Forces, and over-represented the months just before deployment and just after redeployment. According to analysis by the Armed Forces Health Surveillance center using the number of diagnoses of major depressive disorder among the active duty forces, the percentage of the active duty forces ever diagnosed with major depressive disorder rose from 4.4% in 2007 to 5.1% in 2010, while the incidence rate of new diagnoses rose to 19.2 per 1,000 per year in 2009 from 17.3 per 1,000 per person per year in 2007 before declining to 15.1 per 1,000 per year in 2010. (See Figure 16 .) Limited data are available about the rates of major depressive disorder among the individual services. However, data on diagnoses of major depressive disorder among the services allow for limited comparison of the incidence rates between the services. The incidence rate of diagnoses of major depressive disorder is highest among the Army over this four-year period, peaking at 28.8 per 1,000 per year in 2009. Adjustment disorder is a psychological response to one or more stressors, including life events such as divorce or a period of unemployment. The diagnosis includes four components: the stressor(s), symptoms, the lack of an alternative explanation for the symptoms, and the timing of the symptoms. Stressors may occur once, multiple times, or be chronic. A diagnosis of adjustment disorder does not require specific symptoms. Rather, it requires clinically significant distress, such as anxiety or depressed mood, or impairment in functioning, such as social or occupational problems. A diagnosis of adjustment disorder is a residual category for cases that do not meet the criteria for another mental disorder. Finally, a diagnosis of adjustment disorder must take the timing of the symptoms relative to the stressor(s) into account. In order for a diagnosis of adjustment disorder to be appropriate, symptoms must appear within three months of the onset of the stressor(s) and resolve within six months of the termination of the stressor(s). Adjustment disorder is acute if symptoms resolve within six months in total, and chronic if symptoms persist for longer than six months. Between 2000 and 2011, adjustment disorders accounted for 26% of mental disorders diagnosed among the active duty forces, for a total of 471,833 diagnoses. The rates of adjustment disorder diagnoses increased by 98% between 2000 and 2011. The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual also provides a means of recording other circumstances of concern that are clinically significant, but that are not diagnosable mental disorders. These are called "V codes" (not to be confused with the DSM-V issued by the APA in May 2013, the successor edition to the DSM-IV-TR) and identify conditions other than a disease or injury. These codes are also used to report significant factors that may influence present or future care or may be a focus of clinical attention. V codes are not necessarily a primary diagnosis. V codes in the DSM-IV-TR include codes for problems in partner relationships; other family relationships; maltreatment, such as physical abuse or sexual abuse; and life circumstances, including bereavement and occupational, religious, academic, identity, or acculturation problems. For details on the use of V codes for mental health issues in the military, please see Appendix A . Active duty servicemembers have been provided assistance for other mental issues, such as difficulties related to life circumstances (including pending, current, or recent deployments), difficulty in a partner relationship, or mental, behavioral, or substance use difficulties. Between 2000 and 2011, over 425,000 active duty servicemembers sought help for these mental health problems. This number does not include servicemembers who received diagnoses for specific mental disorders. Overall, incidence rates of DSM "V codes" related to mental health issues have declined overall from 2000 through 2011 by approximately 30%, but with a sharp increase between 2004 and 2005. Incidence rates and numbers of DSM "V codes" connected to mental, behavioral, and substance abuse issues are the only category of mental health problems to have increased between 2000 and 2011, increasing by approximately 120%. (See Figure 17 .) While these other mental health issues are not themselves mental health diagnoses, they play an important role in the psychological health of the active duty force. For example, one study of servicemembers who have received mental health care for "V code" conditions related to family or partner problems found they were at increased risk of death by suicide. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention defines TBI as an injury to the head arising from blunt or penetrating trauma, or from acceleration-deceleration forces that result in one or more of the following: decreased level of consciousness; amnesia regarding the event itself or events preceding or following the injury; skull fracture; a neurological or neuropsychological abnormality such as disorientation, agitation, or confusion; or an intracranial lesion such as a traumatic intracranial hematoma, cerebral contusion, or penetrating injury. Neurologists classify the severity of the TBI as mild, moderate, severe, or penetrating. (See Table 5 .) Penetrating TBIs are open head injuries in which the dura mater, the outer layer of the meninges (the membranes that surround the brain), is penetrated. Because TBI has a readily observable physical cause, it is much different than psychological health conditions. Nevertheless, as discussed below, there may be associations between TBI and other mental health diagnoses. TBI is a common injury from the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, and is a signature injury of improvised explosive device (IED) blasts. However, according to the Defense and Veteran's Brain Injury Center, 84% of TBIs occur in a non-deployed setting. Common causes of TBI include crashes in privately owned and military vehicles, falls, sports and recreation activities, and military training. Symptoms of mild TBI often include headache; dizziness; weakness; sensitivity to light or sound; cognitive symptoms, including difficulty with attention, memory, or language; and psychological symptoms, including irritability, depression, anxiety, or personality changes. Symptoms of mild TBI often overlap with symptoms of other psychological issues, and therefore require concurrent treatment. Approximately 85%-90% of servicemembers who have sustained a combat-related, mild TBI recover with no lasting clinical difficulties. Symptoms of moderate or severe TBI often include longer periods of confusion or disorientation, loss of consciousness, and memory loss. MRI or CT results may be normal or abnormal. Moderate or severe TBI sustained in combat requires early recognition of the injury and speedy evacuation to a combat support hospital or trauma center where specialized neurological care is available. Effective treatment and decisions during the period immediately after brain injury are essential for optimal outcomes. Since 2001, servicemembers have experienced about 255,852 TBIs, including approximately 212,741 incidences of mild TBI, approximately 20,168 incidences of moderate TBI, approximately 6,472 incidences of severe TBI/penetrating head injuries, and 16,471 unclassifiable TBIs. (See Figure 18 .) Incidents of mild TBI rose sharply between 2005 and 2007, due in part to more aggressive screening measures for mild TBI instituted in 2006. (See Figure 19 .) Since March 2006, all servicemembers returning from theatre and all servicemembers arriving at Landsruhe Medical Center receive a TBI screen regardless of other medical conditions. Diagnoses of TBI in deployed settings nearly doubled between 2010 and 2011, due in part to a greater focus on identifying and treating TBIs among deployed servicemembers, as reflected in the July 2010 "Policy Guidance for the Management of Concussion/Mild Traumatic Brain Injury in the Deployed Setting." These policies require TBI screening for those exposed to potentially concussive events, and medical evaluation for all servicemembers who sustained physical injury, exhibited TBI symptoms such as headache or ear ringing, or were within 50 meters of a blast. Screening for TBI is indicated if the servicemember has been exposed to any mechanism of injury that could potentially cause TBI, for example, blast exposures, falls, or vehicle crashes. According to researchers, reliance on servicemember self-reports and co-occurring conditions can make TBI screening challenging. The deployed acute screening tool for concussion, the Concussion Management Algorithm, was updated in early 2012. Screening for concussion is required for any servicemember who is in a vehicle with a blast event, collision, or rollover; is within 50 meters of a blast; sustains a direct blow to the head; or at the direction of their commander, for example, with repeated exposures to injury mechanisms. All exposed servicemembers, including those who test negative for concussion, are mandated to rest for 24 hours before returning to duty. All services have experienced a rise in the number of TBIs, although the rate of increase has been much greater for the Army and Marines Corps than for the Navy and Air Force. When broken out by type of TBI (mild, moderate, severe/penetrating, or unclassifiable), Army servicemembers have experienced the greatest number of TBIs of each type. (See Figure 20 .) Over the 12 years between 2000 and 2011, approximately 175,290 active component servicemembers had at least one TBI diagnosis. Records of the cause of injury were not available for over 60% of these diagnoses. Between 2008 and 2011, for the 24,115 servicemembers where the cause of the TBI was recorded, approximately 74% were the result of accidents, including motor vehicle accidents (20%), falls (20%), or striking or being struck by an object (15%). Assaults and battle injuries were each the reported cause of 11% of TBIs where the cause was recorded. In combat theatres, 6,950 TBIs were diagnosed between 2008 and 2011. While only 15% of these diagnoses had cause-of-injury codes, nearly all of these TBIs were attributed to combat injuries (88%) or gun/explosive accidents (7%). A 2008 Institute of Medicine report conducted a meta-analysis and review of research on the long-term consequences of TBI. Studies have found TBI and brain injury survivors are at elevated risk for depression, generalized anxiety disorder, and PTSD. One study of TBI and associated psychiatric illnesses found that 49% of those with moderate or severe TBI had evidence of psychiatric illness, compared to 34% in the mild TBI group and 18% of those without TBI. The risk generally scales with the increased severity of a TBI. There is also limited evidence that suggests an association between TBI and completed suicide, although there is insufficient evidence to determine whether there is an association between TBI and attempted suicide. Among Gulf War veterans, there is limited/suggestive evidence of an association between mild TBI and PTSD. The 2008 Institute of Medicine report also concluded that TBI is associated with aggression, irritability, emotional reactivity, sleep disorders, drug and alcohol abuse and dependence, and personality disorders, among other personality and behavioral outcomes related to poor psychosocial functioning. Several studies have shown a connection between TBI and a greater risk of developing dementia. A 2010 study of 280,000 veterans at the San Francisco VA Medical Center found that 15% of veterans diagnosed with TBI developed dementia, compared to 7% of those without a diagnosis. The 2008 Institute of Medicine meta-analysis and review of research on the long-term consequences of TBI concluded that that there is evidence of an association between moderate or severe TBI and dementia of the Alzheimer type and Parkinson's disease. It also found that there is limited or suggestive evidence between mild TBI and some types of dementia. Beginning in 2010, suicide has been the second-leading cause of death for active duty servicemembers, behind only war injuries. Researchers have suggested that, similar to suicides among civilians, suicides by servicemembers are often impulsive acts triggered by various stressors, including relationship problems, financial or legal problems, or financial problems. Suicides among the active duty forces have increased between 1998 and 2012, rising from approximately 200 deaths by suicide in 1998 to 349 in 2012. (See Figure 21 .) Between 1998 and 2011, 2,990 servicemembers on active duty have died by suicide, with an incidence rate of approximately 14 per 100,000 person years. However, the suicide rate among active duty servicemembers has sharply increased since 2005, reaching a peak of 18.5 per 100,000 in 2009 and declining slightly to 17.5 per 100,000 in 2010 and 18 per 100,000 in 2011. (See Figure 22 .) While the rates of suicide in the Armed Forces overall have increased between 1998 and 2011, the rates remain lower than for comparable civilian populations. Lower suicide rates among the Armed Forces have been attributed to a variety of factors, including the servicemember's full-time employment; "healthy-worker" effects, including a sense of belonging and purpose among active duty servicemembers; and universal access to health care among the military population. From 1990 to 2000, before the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, the incidence of suicide in active duty forces was approximately 25% lower than in comparable civilian populations, approximately 8.31 per 100,000 people per year among the active duty forces, as compared to 12.31 per person per year in the civilian population. Between 1998 and 2011, researchers have estimated that if the active duty Armed Forces had the same rates of death by suicide as a comparable civilian population, the number of deaths by suicide among male active duty servicemembers would have been approximately 23% higher, resulting in an additional 598 deaths by suicide among male servicemembers. Rates of death by suicide also differ across the services. Between 1998 and 2011, the Army has experienced the greatest number of servicemember deaths by suicide, 1,370, or 46% of all servicemember deaths by suicide. (See Figure 23 .) Most of the increase in suicide rates between 2000 and 2011 has been concentrated in the Army and Marine Corps. Between 2005 and 2009 the incidence of suicide has nearly doubled for Army and Marine personnel, while remaining approximately level for Navy and Air Force personnel. In 2011, the suicide rate for Army personnel was approximately 23 per 100,000, while the rates for the Navy and Marine Corps were approximately 15 per 100,000 and the rate for the Air Force was approximately 13 per 100,000. According to the 2011 DOD Suicide Event Report, servicemembers who died by suicide in 2011 were more likely than the rest of the general military population to be male, junior enlisted (E1-E4) or high school educated, under the age of 25, and non-Hispanic white. These trends among attempted suicides and death by suicide among the active duty forces for 2011 were similar to those in 2010 and 2009, the two other calendar years for which detailed information is available. Additionally, the suicide rate for divorced servicemembers was 55% greater than the suicide rate for married servicemembers in 2011. In general, these data regarding deaths by suicide among the active duty forces must be regarded with caution. The deaths by suicide, as captured by the Armed Forces Medical Examiner system, include only suicides that occurred during active duty military service. Therefore, these suicide figures for the active duty forces do not include deaths by suicide or suicide attempts by inactivated National Guard and Reserve members, or individuals who die by suicide after their military service has ended. In addition, suicides by various methods may be difficult to authoritatively ascertain as suicides. For example, suicides by drug overdoses or automobile accidents may be misclassified as accidents, leading to the undercounting of both deaths by suicide and suicide attempts. Between 1998 and 2011, firearms were the most frequently used method of suicide by active duty servicemembers, accounting for 62% of suicides among males and 42% among females. The proportion of suicides due to firearms was highest in the Reserve component, at 70%. Firearms were the most commonly used method of suicide among males of all age groups and females age 20 and over. Nearly 60% of all active duty deaths by suicide in 2011 used firearms. Non-military issue firearms were used in 49% of deaths by suicide in 2011. Hanging was the second most common cause of death by suicide, accounting for 20% of all deaths by suicide. In 2011, drug overdoses were the most common method of suicide attempts, accounting for nearly 60% of non-fatal attempted suicides. Of all suicide attempts that involved drug use, 64% involved the use of prescription drugs. 41% of all deaths by suicide or attempts at suicide involved prescription drug use. Alcohol use was involved in 31% of suicide attempts. Firearms were used in 4% of suicide attempts. Between 1998 and 2011, nearly half of active duty deaths by suicide involved personal weapons, while about 6% of suicide attempts involved firearms. (See Figure 24 .) Firearms were present in the homes of 50% of servicemembers who died by suicide, as compared to 11% of servicemembers who attempted suicide. DOD officials are developing a suicide prevention campaign that will encourage friends and families of potentially suicidal servicemembers to safely store or voluntarily remove personal firearms from their homes. Most servicemembers who attempted suicide (76%) or died by suicide (74%) were not known to have communicated their potential for self-harm. Those who did most often communicated with spouses, friends, and other family members. Of the 301 servicemembers who died by suicide in 2011: 55% had no known behavioral health disorder; 20% had mood disorders. 11% had depression, the most common diagnosed mood disorder; 16% had an anxiety disorder. The most common anxiety disorder, at 6% of deaths by suicide, was PTSD; 25% had a known history of substance abuse, while 16% received substance abuse treatment services; 40% received outpatient behavioral health care, while 17% had received outpatient behavioral health services within the month prior to suicide; 15% had received inpatient behavioral health treatment; 26% had a known history of psychotropic medication use, most frequently antidepressants (22%); 47% had experienced a failure of a spousal or intimate relationship, 27.5% within the 30 days prior to suicide; 18% had experienced Article 15 proceedings/non-judicial punishment, while 13% had experienced civil legal problems; 21% had a known history of job loss or instability, e.g., demotions; and, 47% had been deployed, while 8% had been deployed multiple times. 15% had direct combat experience. In 2011, 915 active duty servicemembers attempted, but did not complete, suicide. 896 servicemembers attempted suicide once, 18 attempted suicide twice, and 1 servicemember attempted suicide three times. Of the 915 active duty servicemembers who attempted suicide in 2011: 64% had a known history of a behavioral health disorder; 34% had a mood disorder, most frequently major depression (21%); 25% had diagnoses of anxiety disorders, most frequently PTSD (12%); 27% had a known history of substance abuse; 43% had a known history of psychotropic medication use, most frequently antidepressants (36.5%); 61% had received outpatient behavioral health services within the month prior to suicide; 52% had experienced a failure of a spousal or intimate relationship, 33% within the month prior to suicide; 19% had experienced Article 15 proceedings/non-judicial punishment, while 7% had experienced civil legal problems; 31% had a known history of job loss or instability, e.g., demotions; and 40% had been deployed, 4% had been deployed multiple times, and 17% had direct combat experience. The reasons for the higher rates in mental health diagnoses and suicide rates among Army and Marine personnel are not clear. While repeated ground combat tours would be a possible answer, according to U.S. military medical researchers, "to date no study has definitively confirmed an independent variation" of ground combat tours with servicemember suicides. Researchers suggest that "the cumulative strain from the protracted war effort, across both deployed and garrison environments" may be "causing higher population prevalence of mental disorders," leading to higher suicide rates. Many Members of Congress, military leaders, and health providers have expressed concern that increased numbers of deployments and shorter "dwell" times between deployments have increased the stress and mental health toll on U.S. servicemembers. However, studies of deployed servicemembers have reached varying conclusions regarding the links between deployment(s) and various psychological health concerns, including PTSD, depression, anxiety, and stress. While several studies have found higher rates of mental health problems among repeat deployers than among first-time deployers, other studies have found little evidence of a causal link between repeated deployments and various mental health problems. One possible explanation is that servicemembers who are more negatively affected by deployments are less likely to deploy again, and may leave the Armed Forces. Therefore, the servicemembers who deploy repeatedly may be more resilient. Additionally, servicemembers with repeated deployments may gain additional knowledge, skills, and confidence in combat environments, also increasing their psychological resilience. According to an analysis of diagnoses received by previously deployed active component servicemembers, rates of diagnoses of anxiety disorders and adjustment reactions (including PTSD) rose after the first, second, and third deployments, before falling sharply for the fourth and fifth deployments. A follow-up study, focusing specifically on mental health diagnoses received in the year after a servicemember returns from combat, found that among male servicemembers, diagnoses of PTSD, adjustment reactions, anxiety-related disorders, and depressive disorders were more common after second, third, and fourth deployments than first deployments. Among male servicemembers, a greater proportion was diagnosed with alcohol or drug disorders, suicidal ideation/self-inflicted injuries, and psychosocial problems after the first deployment than all following deployments. The results among female servicemembers were somewhat different. Like among male servicemembers, PTSD diagnoses increased following the second, third, and fourth deployments. However, the percentage of female servicemembers diagnosed with other mental disorders, including depressive disorders, alcohol/drug disorders, suicidal ideation/self-inflicted injury, adjustment reactions, anxiety disorders, and psychosocial problems all declined after repeated deployments. (See Figure 25 .) Overall, for all deployed active component servicemembers, larger percentages received diagnoses of PTSD and anxiety-related disorders after the second and/or third deployment than after the first deployment. The rates of PTSD diagnoses fall sharply after the fourth and fifth deployments. However, for other mental disorders than anxiety disorders and PTSD, a greater proportion of deployed servicemembers receive diagnoses after their first deployment than subsequent deployments. Quickened deployment cycles and the shorter "dwell" time between deployments are often cited as a risk factor leading to greater stress and higher rates of mental disorders among deployed servicemembers. However, a recent analysis by the Armed Forces Health Surveillance Center found that the percentages of deployed servicemembers diagnosed with a mental disorder were greater among servicemembers with longer dwell times between deployments. However, the study cautions that personal circumstances can greatly influence the nature, magnitude, duration, and effects of stresses related to transition and readjustment periods, such as preparing for or following a deployment. The Armed Forces Health Surveillance Center study also speculates that the double transition from "warrior" to being fully adjusted as non-deployed back to "warrior" status may play a role. They also note that servicemembers with medical conditions associated with recent deployments may have very long dwell times and be at a higher risk of recurrent or related conditions following their deployment. Deployed servicemembers in health care occupations consistently had the highest rates of PTSD diagnoses, as well as diagnoses of other anxiety disorders, adjustment reactions, and depressive disorder than servicemembers in other occupations, including combat-specific occupations. (See Figure 26 .) One possible explanation is that the consistent exposure of servicemembers in health care occupations to traumatic injuries suffered by others leads to higher rates of PTSD, as compared to the more intermittent, but more intense and personal exposures to life-threatening experiences among combat-specific occupations. Additionally, servicemembers in health care occupations likely have a higher utilization of health care, including mental health care, than servicemembers in combat-specific occupations. Appendix A. Diagnostic Codes Appendix B. Legislation National Defense Authorization for Fiscal Year 2013 The National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 ( P.L. 112-239 ) contained several sections addressing military mental health issues, including: Section 580 required the Secretary of Defense, acting through the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness, to establish within the Office of the Secretary of Defense a position with responsibility for oversight of all suicide prevention and resilience programs of DOD and each of the military departments. Section 581 amended Chapter 1007 of Title 10, United States Code, to codify the Suicide Prevention and Community Health and Response Program for National Guard and Reserve component members, to require the Secretary of Defense to provide training on suicide prevention, resilience, and community healing and response at Yellow Ribbon Reintegration Program events and activities, to move the program from within the Office for Reintegration Programs to the Office of the Secretary of Defense, and to repeal subsection (i) of Section 582 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (10 U.S.C. 10101 note). The program would terminate on October 1, 2017. Section 582 required the Secretary of Defense, acting through the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness, to develop within the Department of Defense a comprehensive policy on the prevention of suicide among servicemembers. Section 583 required the Secretary of the Army to conduct a study of resilience programs within the Army that would draw upon professionally accepted measurements and assessments to evaluate the impact of these programs. Section 703 amended Section 1074m(a) of Title 10, United States Code, to align mandatory post-deployment person-to-person mental health assessments for certain servicemembers with other existing health assessments by changing the required assessment period from between 180 days after deployment to 1 year after deployment, to between 180 days after deployment to 18 months after deployment. Section 706 authorized the Secretary of Defense to carry out a pilot program to enhance the efforts of DOD in research, treatment, education, and outreach on mental health, substance use disorders, and traumatic brain injury in members of the National Guard and Reserves, their family members, and their caregivers through agreements with community partners. Section 723 required the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to jointly enter into a memorandum of understanding providing for the sharing between departments of the results of examinations and other records on members of the Armed Forces that are retained and maintained with respect to the medical tracking system for members deployed overseas. Section 724 required the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to jointly enter into a memorandum of understanding providing for certain members of the Armed Forces to volunteer or be considered for employment as peer counselors under certain peer support counseling programs carried out by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs. Section 725 required the Secretary of Defense to provide for the translation of research on the diagnosis and treatment of mental health conditions into policy on medical practices. Section 726 required the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to develop and implement a comprehensive set of measures to assess mental health care services provided by the Department of Veterans Affairs. Section 727 authorized the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to provide counseling and mental health services to certain members of the Armed Forces and their family members at vet centers. Section 729 required the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to carry out a national program of outreach to societies, community organizations, nonprofit organizations, and government entities in order to recruit mental health providers to provide mental health care services for the VA on a part-time, without compensation basis. Section 730 amended Section 1720F(j) of Title 38, United States Code, to require the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to establish and carry out a peer support counseling program as a part of the existing comprehensive program designed to reduce the incidence of suicide among veterans. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 The National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ( P.L. 112-81 ) contained provisions that addressed military mental health issues: Section 703 authorized the Secretary of Defense to provide to any Reserve member performing inactive-duty training during scheduled unit training assemblies access to mental health assessments with a licensed mental health professional who would be available for referrals during duty hours at the principal duty location of the member's unit. The provision further required each Reserve member participating in annual training or individual training to have access to behavioral health support programs. Section 711 directed the Secretary of Defense to prescribe and maintain regulations relating to commanding officer and supervisor referrals of members for mental health evaluations. The provision required that these regulations seek to eliminate any perceived stigma associated with seeking and receiving mental health services. The provision further outlined procedures for mental health evaluations, and prohibited using such referrals to retaliate against whistleblowers. Section 723 required the Secretary of Defense to report to the defense and appropriations committees assessing the benefits of neuroimaging in an effort to identify and improve the diagnosis of PTSD. Section 724 directed the Secretary of Defense to report to the defense and appropriations committees on the implementation of DOD policy related to the management of concussion and mild traumatic brain injury in the deployed setting. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 The Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 ( P.L. 111-383 ) contained provisions that addressed military mental health issues: Section 712 required the current DOD medical tracking system for members deployed overseas to include the use of pre- and post-deployment medical examinations and health reassessments to (1) reflect the medical condition of members before their deployment; (2) record any changes to their condition during their deployment; and (3) identify health concerns, including mental health concerns, that may become manifest several months following their deployment. The provision further required that these medical records include information on the prescription and administration of psychotropic medications. Section 713 provided license requirements for health care professionals who are members of the National Guard performing training or duty in response to an actual or potential disaster while operating in their state role. Section 722 required the Secretary of Defense to (1) develop and implement a comprehensive policy on consistent automated neurological cognitive assessments of members before and after deployment; and (2) revise the policy on a periodic basis in accordance with experience and evolving best practice guidelines. Section 723 directed the military department Secretaries to assess and report on the incidence of PTSD by military occupation. It further required the Secretary of Defense to ensure that all such assessments, findings, plans, and reports are transmitted to the centers of excellence for the treatment and prevention of PTSD and traumatic brain injury, as established under the NDAA for Fiscal Year 2008. Section 724 requires the Secretary to prescribe regulations concerning requirements that mental health counselors must meet in order to practice independently under TRICARE. S.Rept. 111-201 requested the Secretary of Defense to submit a report on cognitive rehabilitation therapy for TBI. In response, on April 30, 2012, the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness submitted a report to Congress entitled "Cognitive Rehabilitation Therapy for Traumatic Brain Injury." National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 The National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 ( P.L. 111-84 ) contained provisions that addressed military mental health issues: Section 52 1 authorized the Secretary of each military department to detail officers as students at accredited schools of psychology in the United States for training leading to a degree of Doctor of Philosophy in clinical psychology. Section 595 amended the NDAA for Fiscal Year 2008 to direct the Office for Reintegration Programs (part of the Yellow Ribbon Reintegration Program under such act) to establish a program to provide National Guard and Reserve members and their families, and assist local communities, with training in suicide prevention and community healing and response to suicide. Section 596 directed the Secretary of Defense to (1) conduct a comprehensive review and assessment of DOD programs and activities for the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of substance abuse disorders in members, as well as DOD policies relating to the disposition of substance abuse offenders in the Armed Forces; (2) report findings and recommendations to the defense committees; and (3) submit to the defense and appropriations committees a plan for the improvement and enhancement of such programs, activities, and policies. The section also requires such plan to include a comprehensive DOD statement of policy, mechanisms to ensure the availability of services and treatment as well as the prevention and reduction of substance abuse disorders, and specific instructions on the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of substance abuse in members. It also requires confidentiality for members with respect to treatment. This section also directs the (1) Secretary of Defense to provide for an independent study on substance use disorders programs for servicemembers by the Institute of Medicine of the National Academy of Sciences or other independent entity; and (2) the results of this report must be reported to the Secretary of Defense and the defense and appropriations committees. Section 708 directed the Secretary of Defense to issue guidance for the provision of a person-to-person mental health assessment for each member deployed in connection with a contingency operation within specified periods before and following deployment. It excludes from assessment requirements members determined not to have been subjected or exposed to operational risk factors during such deployment. Section 712 directed the Secretary of Defense to (1) report to the defense and appropriations committees on the implementation of DOD policy guidance regarding deployment-limiting psychiatric conditions and medications; and (2) establish and implement a policy for the use of psychotropic medications for deployed members. Section 714 directed each military department secretary to increase by a specified amount the number of active-duty mental health care personnel authorized for that department. Requires the Secretary of Defense to (1) report to the defense and appropriations committees on the appropriate number of such personnel required to meet the mental health care needs of members; (2) develop and implement a plan to significantly increase the number of such personnel by the end of FY2013; and (3) report to such committees on the feasibility and advisability of establishing one or more military mental health specialties for officers or enlisted members in order to better meet the mental health care needs of members and their families. In response to these reporting requirements, DOD submitted a report entitled "Mental Health Personnel Required to Meet Mental Health Care Needs of Service Members, Retired Members, and Dependents." Section 71 5 required the Secretary of Defense to (1) conduct a study on the management of medications for physically and psychologically wounded members; and (2) report study results to the defense committees. Section 722 directed the Secretary of Defense to (1) conduct a comprehensive review of the mental health care and counseling services available to dependent children of members; (2) report review results to the defense committees; and (3) develop and implement a comprehensive plan for improvements in access to quality mental health care and counseling services for military children. Section 723 required the Secretary of Defense to (1) provide for a clinical trial to assess the efficacy of cognitive rehabilitative therapy for members and former members who have been diagnosed with a traumatic brain injury incurred in the line of duty in Operations Iraqi Freedom or Enduring Freedom and are referred for such therapy; and (2) provide an initial and final assessment report to the defense and appropriations committees. Section 726 directed the Secretary of Defense to provide for a study on the treatment of PTSD, to be conducted by the Institute of Medicine of the National Academy of Sciences or other independent entity. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 The Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 ( P.L. 110-417 ) contained provisions that addressed military mental health issues: Section 733 required DOD to establish a task force to examine matters relating to the prevention of suicide by members of the Armed Forces. The task force was required to report to the Secretary recommendations on a comprehensive policy designed to prevent such suicides. In response to language in H.Rept. 110-652 to the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009, on August 26, 2010, DOD reported to Congress on the possibility for providing a referral for a second opinion to potentially suicidal servicemembers in combat. This report stated that DOD has decided not to develop a policy to mandate consultation or second opinion for suicidal patients in theater. In response to additional language in the same House report, on June 2, 2009, DOD reported to Congress on DOD progress on suicide prevention. The report stated that the RAND National Defense Research Institute as well as the DOD Suicide Prevention Task Force were undertaking evaluations of matters related to suicide prevention. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 The National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 ( P.L. 110-181 ) contained provisions that addressed military mental health issues: Section 708 included mental health care within the definition of "health care" under the TRICARE program. It also required a report from the Secretary of Defense to the defense committees on the adequacy of access to mental health services under the TRICARE program. Section 716 required the Secretary to conduct a comprehensive review of (1) the need for gender- and ethnic group-specific mental health treatment and services for members; and (2) the efficacy and adequacy of existing gender- and ethnic group-specific mental health treatment programs and services for members. Section 717 directed the Secretary of Defense to (1) establish criteria that licensed or certified mental health counselors must meet in order to independently provide care to TRICARE beneficiaries; (2) contract for an independent study of the credentials, preparation, and training of such individuals; and (3) report study results to the defense committees. Section 1621 required the Secretary to establish in DOD a center of excellence in the prevention, diagnosis, mitigation, treatment, and rehabilitation of (1) TBI; (2) PTSD; and (3) military eye injuries Section 1661 directed the Secretary to enter into an agreement with the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) for a study on the physical and mental health and other readjustment needs of members and former members who deployed in Operations Iraqi Freedom or Enduring Freedom (and their families) as a result of such deployment. Requires the (1) NAS to report to the Secretaries and the defense and appropriations committees upon the completion of each of the two phases of such study; and (2) Secretaries to develop a final DOD-VA response to such findings and recommendations. Section 1634 required a joint report from the Secretaries to the defense committees on DOD-VA changes to ensure that traumatic brain injury victims receive a medical designation concomitant with such injury, rather than a designation which assigns a generic classification such as "organic psychiatric disorder." National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 The John Warner National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 ( P.L. 109-364 ) contained provisions that addressed military mental health issues: Section 721 directed the Secretary of Defense to (1) conduct a 15-year longitudinal study on the effects of traumatic brain injury incurred by members of the Armed Forces in Operations Iraqi Freedom and Enduring Freedom; and (2) provide periodic and final reports to Congress on study results. Section 735 amended the NDAA for Fiscal Year 2006 to require the task force on mental health established under such act to consider, as part of its assessment of DOD mental health services provided to military personnel, the specific needs of members deployed in Operations Iraqi Freedom or Enduring Freedom upon their return from deployment. Section 738 required additional elements for pre-deployment and post-deployment medical examinations, including current treatment and an assessment of traumatic brain injury, and provides criteria for referral for further evaluation. It also directs the Secretary of Defense to prescribe minimum mental health standards for eligibility of a member for deployment to a combat or contingency operation. Requires the (1) Comptroller General to conduct a study of, and report to the defense committees on, the implementation of the requirements of this section; and (2) the Secretary of Defense to implement the requirements and report to such committees on such implementation. Section 741 directed the Secretary to carry out no less than three one-year pilot projects to evaluate the efficacy of various approaches to improving the capability of the military and civilian health care system to provide early diagnosis and treatment of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and other mental health conditions. Requires one of such projects to be (1) designed to evaluate diagnostic and treatment approaches for use by primary care providers to improve the diagnosis and treatment of PTSD; (2) focused on members of the National Guard or Reserve located more than 40 miles from a military medical facility, and whose personnel are served primarily by civilian community health resources; and (3) designed to provide outreach to family members on PTSD and other mental health conditions. Section 744 required the Secretary to establish within DOD a panel to develop curricula for training family members in the provision of care and assistance to members and former members with traumatic brain injuries. It designated this panel as the Traumatic Brain Injury Family Caregiver Panel. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006 The National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006 ( P.L. 109-163 ) contained provisions that addressed military mental health issues: Section 594 required a member's pre-separation counseling to include information concerning (1) the availability of mental health services and the treatment of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), anxiety, depression, suicide, and other mental health conditions associated with service in the Armed Forces; (2) veterans' training and hiring priorities; (3) veterans' small business ownership and entrepreneurship programs; (4) employment and reemployment rights; (5) veterans' preference in federal employment; (6) available housing counseling assistance; and (7) a description of veterans' health care and other benefits. Section 721 required the Secretary to develop a program to improve awareness of the availability of mental health services for, and warning signs about mental health problems in, dependents of members who served or will serve in a combat theater during the previous or next 60 days. It also directs the Secretary to (1) carry out a pilot project to evaluate the efficacy of various approaches to improving the capability of the military and civilian health care systems to provide early diagnosis and treatment of PTSD and other mental health conditions; and (2) report to the defense and appropriations committees on the project. Section 722 authorized the Secretary to carry out pilot projects on improving the early diagnosis and treatment of PTSD and other mental health conditions. Authorizes at least one such project at a National Guard or Reserve facility located at least 40 miles from a military medical facility and whose personnel are served primarily by civilian community health resources. Section 723 required (1) the Secretary to establish within DOD a task force to examine matters relating to mental health and the Armed Forces; (2) the task force to report to the Secretary, including an assessment of, and recommendations for improving, mental health care provided by the military departments; (3) the task force to report to the Secretary on all activities undertaken under this section; and (4) the latter report to be transmitted to the defense and veterans' committees. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2005 The Ronald W. Reagan National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2005 ( P.L. 108-375 ) contained provisions that addressed military mental health issues: Section 723 required the Comptroller General to study, and report to Congress on, mental health services available to members of the Armed Forces, including: (1) the availability and effectiveness of existing mental health treatment and screening resources; and (2) obstacles preventing members and their families from obtaining needed services.

Summary: Military servicemembers suffering from post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), traumatic brain injury (TBI), and depression, as well as military suicides, continue to be a major concern of Congress. Numerous legislative provisions have been enacted over the past years to address these issues. Members will likely seek to offer legislation in the 113th Congress to address this complex set of issues. This report is intended to provide assistance in understanding the issues associated with psychological health in the active duty forces, potential congressional responses, and what questions may remain unanswered. Key points in this report include the following: mental disorders such as PTSD are poorly understood and in most cases cannot be physically identified but, rather, must be diagnosed using symptoms reported by the servicemember; estimates of the prevalence of mental health conditions in any given population may be greatly affected by the methodology used; diagnoses of mental health conditions among active duty servicemembers have increased substantially relative to non-deployed servicemembers. This increase may be due to the psychological toll of exposure to conflict, but may also be due in part to increased and improved screening methods as well as Department of Defense (DOD) efforts to reduce the stigma associated with seeking mental health treatment that might dissuade some servicemembers from reporting mental health concerns or accessing care; and reliable evidence is lacking as to the quality of mental health care and counseling offered in DOD facilities. A 2012 Institute of Medicine (IOM) study recommended that DOD undertake efforts to measure the effectiveness of efforts to improve quality, such as training providers in evidence-based practice, that are not integrated into the system of mental health care offered in DOD treatment facilities. Significant areas for potential congressional oversight activities regarding psychological health in the active duty forces include the following: research into the causes and physical manifestations of psychological health conditions, screening tools, and treatments; the effectiveness of screening and treatment efforts; servicemembers' access to mental health care, including efforts to reduce the stigma of seeking mental health care, waiting times for care, staffing levels of mental health treatment professionals, mental health care available in remote or deployed settings, and care available to de-activated Reserve and Guard members; the quality of mental health care available to servicemembers, including the use of appropriate and effective treatments by qualified mental health treatment professionals; oversight of ongoing program evaluation efforts, including evaluation of the variety of suicide-prevention, stigma-reduction, and transition assistance programs within the services and DOD; and the costs of mental health care for active duty servicemembers, including present costs through the Defense Health Program, as well as the future costs of mental health care once servicemembers are no longer part of the active duty forces.