Hurricane Katrina struck Florida and the Gulf Coast states in the last days of August 2005, followed within weeks by Hurricanes Rita and Wilma. These disasters will long be remembered for disrupting families, changing and ending lives, and forcing Americans to rethink vulnerability and risk assumptions. In addition to these impacts, the hurricanes served as catalysts for significant changes in federal policy and the organization of responsible federal entities, notably within the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). Most of those changes were included in Title VI of the DHS appropriations legislation for FY2007. Among other provisions, Title VI, officially titled the "Post-Katrina Emergency Management Reform Act of 2006" (hereafter referred to as the Post-Katrina Act), established new leadership positions and position requirements within the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), brought new missions into FEMA and restored some that had previously been removed, and enhanced the agency's authority by directing the FEMA Administrator to undertake a broad range of activities before and after disasters occur. The Post-Katrina Act contains provisions that set out new law, amend the Homeland Security Act (HSA), and modify the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (the Stafford Act). In addition to the Post-Katrina Act, Congress enacted five other statutes that have long-term implications for the administration of federal emergency policies. These include: Sections of P.L. 109-347 ( H.R. 4954 ), the Security and Accountability for Every Port Act of 2005, known as the SAFE Port Act; P.L. 109-308 ( H.R. 3858 ), the Pets Evacuation and Transportation Standards Act of 2006; P.L. 109-63 ( H.R. 3650 ), the Federal Judiciary Emergency Special Sessions Act of 2005; P.L. 109-67 ( H.R. 3668 ), the Student Grant Hurricane and Disaster Relief Act; and Sections of P.L. 109-364 ( H.R. 5122 ), the John Warner National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007. Through these enactments the 109 th Congress acted on findings and conclusions reached by House and Senate investigators, White House staff, offices of federal Inspectors General (especially those published by the DHS office) and the Government Accountability Office (GAO), among others, who evaluated the consequences of and response to Hurricane Katrina. The investigators and their studies presented findings on major shortcomings, and most urged a reconsideration of existing policies and practices. This CRS report summarizes information on the emergency management modifications adopted by Congress in response to the widespread calls for change. This report summarizes provisions from legislation enacted by the 109 th Congress with regard to federal emergency management authorities but does not cover all legislation enacted in response to Hurricanes Katrina, Rita, and Wilma. Information on legislation that provided funds, extended benefits, or authorized temporary waivers of statutory or administrative requirements solely for the victims of Hurricane Katrina or other specific disasters is available elsewhere. The focus here is on far-reaching and potentially permanent change in federal approaches to emergency management. Also, the emergency communications provisions in the Post-Katrina Act (Subtitle D, cited as the "21 st Century Communications Act of 2006") and the bioterrorism legislation enacted in the closing day of the 109 th Congress are not summarized in this report. The content of this report is limited to congressional action. The Bush Administration has taken steps since Hurricane Katrina to revise practices and policies. For example, the framework that guides federal agency activities after a major disaster, the National Response Plan , is under review. Preparation for other hazards, notably a pandemic influenza outbreak, continues. Officials, and their leadership duties, have been reconsidered and replaced or reassigned. This report does not reference such administrative actions. This CRS report is not analytical; its sole purpose is to summarize selected provisions of legislation enacted during the 109 th and the 110 th Congresses. In order to provide some context, the report does include background information on the relevant policy areas. This report comprises ten sections, as follows: the location and status of FEMA and the agency's authorities; the capabilities, responsibilities, and requirements associated with leadership positions; modifications to the statutory provisions relevant to the workforce charged with implementing emergency management policies; changes in national preparedness system components and requirements (those not specifically included in FEMA's mission); new emergency management education and training requirements; amendments to the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (the Stafford Act) that provide additional or modified assistance authority to the President; changes in procedures governing federal contracting and procurement; oversight and review requirements that are expected to reduce fraud and waste practices in emergency response; requirements for the production of reports and guidelines; and miscellaneous provisions. Since 1979, when the agency was first established, FEMA has been charged with carrying out activities that enable the federal, state, and local governments to address a broad spectrum of emergency management functions. In carrying out its mission, FEMA has (1) funded and coordinated emergency preparedness activities, (2) provided and coordinated immediate federal response to save lives and property, (3) funded the reconstruction of damaged homes and infrastructure to help stricken families and communities recover, and (4) supported hazard mitigation activities to ensure that future disasters do not recur, or are less destructive in the future. These four elements of preparedness, response, recovery, and hazard mitigation constitute what has been generally referred to as the comprehensive emergency management (CEM) system. As a small independent agency from 1979 through 2000, FEMA exercised responsibility for federal implementation of the CEM concept. For part of that time, from 1993 through 2000, agency officials also used those concepts to organize the agency. Beginning in the spring of 2001 (before the September terrorist attacks), the Bush Administration reorganized FEMA reportedly to take "the agency in a new direction by refocusing its efforts on civil defense and counterterrorism." After the terrorist attacks, through enactment of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 (HSA), the 107 th Congress and the Bush Administration continued the reorganization of the agency by divesting it of certain CEM responsibilities. Of particular relevance to this examination, the HSA transferred emergency preparedness functions related to terrorism from FEMA to the Border and Transportation Security (BTS) Directorate. The reassignment of certain CEM responsibilities, and concomitant organizational changes, continued in 2005, both before and after Hurricane Katrina. Pursuant to the HSA, which authorizes the Secretary to reorganize most parts of the department, Secretary Chertoff initiated what he called the Second Stage Review, or 2SR initiative, in the winter of 2005. After roughly six months, Secretary Chertoff recommended, and Congress approved, the division of responsibility for CEM functions. Since October 1, 2005, CEM functions have been divided between two components of the department—FEMA and the new Preparedness Directorate (PD). The FEMA Director, who also held the title of Under Secretary for Federal Emergency Management, has reported directly to the Secretary and has overseen three divisions (Response, Mitigation, and Recovery), ten regional offices, and numerous other components. Emergency preparedness functions have been vested in PD, which has been headed by an under secretary who has reported to the Secretary. Major components in this directorate have included the Assistant Secretary of Homeland Security for Infrastructure Protection; the Chief Medical Officer of DHS; the Office of Grants and Training; the U.S. Fire Administration; the Office of the National Capital Region Coordination; the Center for Faith-Based and Community Initiatives; and the Office of Cyber and Telecommunications, which includes the National Communications System and the National Cybersecurity Division. Of note, however, is the exclusion of one preparedness function from the PD portfolio. FEMA has continued to exercise a limited role in coordinating and guiding the efforts of federal agencies to prepare, maintain, and exercise contingency plans to ensure that essential government functions continue after catastrophes. In examining the lessons learned from Hurricane Katrina, the 109 th Congress considered this dynamic history of functional and organizational changes. It appears that Congress concluded that while the HSA vested responsibilities of leading and supporting a national, risk-based CEM program in FEMA, the assignment of authorities and the organization of the agency indicated otherwise. Some contended that, as a result of these mission and organizational shifts, FEMA's capabilities deteriorated as functions, resources, and responsibilities moved to other DHS units. Others argued that an emphasis on terrorist-caused incidents within DHS dominated planning and allocation decisions and contributed to FEMA's diminished capabilities for all hazards. These findings led to congressional enactment of significant revisions to FEMA's structure and mission in the Post-Katrina Act, as summarized below. The Post-Katrina Act reorganizes DHS with a reconfigured FEMA (effective March 31, 2007) with consolidated emergency management functions, elevated status within the department, and enhanced organizational autonomy. The organization and many of the authorities and responsibilities assigned to FEMA under the act are summarized in this section of the report, except for authorities specific to preparedness activities. Many of those responsibilities are vested in the President (and are to be carried out by the FEMA Administrator), so they are summarized in the " National Preparedness " section of this report. Under the Post-Katrina Act, the new FEMA will comprise the Preparedness Directorate and all of the functions of the existing FEMA. This includes, for each of the entities, personnel, assets, components, authorities, grant programs, liabilities, and the functions of their respective Under Secretaries. Several entities from the Preparedness Directorate, noted below in the " Other DHS Entities " sub-section, are excepted from transfer to the newly configured FEMA. In addition, the act provides for 10 regional offices with specified responsibilities and features. It also provides, in statute, for the National Integration Center, specifying the center's responsibilities and role with regard to incident management. In addition to these existing elements, the new FEMA will include two positions and one entity, both newly established by the Post-Katrina Act—a Disability Coordinator, a Small State and Rural Advocate, and a National Advisory Council. At the regional level, the Post-Katrina Act provides for the creation of Regional Advisory Councils, Regional Office Strike Teams, and regional Emergency Communications Coordination Working Groups. The act also permits the Administrator to establish Hurricane Katrina and Hurricane Rita recovery offices in Mississippi, Louisiana, Alabama, and Texas. In addition to the aggregation of these offices and entities into FEMA, the Post-Katrina Act gives FEMA more organizational autonomy than it has had since becoming part of DHS. Like the U.S. Coast Guard and the U.S. Secret Service, FEMA is now classified as a distinct entity within DHS. In addition, the agency is no longer subject to the Secretary's broad reorganization authority under HSA. The act authorizes the FEMA Administrator, as of March 31, 2007, to provide emergency-management-related recommendations directly to Congress after informing the Secretary. (Additional provisions strengthening FEMA's organizational autonomy, related to funding and functions, are noted in the next section.) As of March 31, 2007, the Post-Katrina Act will restore to FEMA the responsibility to lead and support efforts to reduce the loss of life and property and protect the nation from all hazards through a risk-based system that focuses on expanded CEM components. The statute also adds a fifth component—protection—to the four CEM components, but does not define the term. The act transfers to the new FEMA all functions previously administered by FEMA, specifically emergency alert systems, continuity of operations, and continuity of government activities, as well as those functions administered by the Preparedness Directorate, as they were administered, effective June 1, 2006. The legislation exempts from the transfer the functions of four Preparedness Directorate units—Office of Infrastructure Protection, National Communications System, National Cybersecurity Division, and the Office of the Chief Medical Officer. In addition, the Post-Katrina Act includes activities and responsibilities for FEMA beyond those first included in the HSA in 2002. The act also explicitly prohibits substantial or significant reductions, by the Secretary, of the authorities, responsibilities, or functions of FEMA, or FEMA's capability to perform them. Furthermore, the Post-Katrina Act prohibits most transfers of FEMA assets, functions, or missions to other parts of DHS. With regard to reprogramming or transfer of funds, the act requires that the Secretary comply with any applicable appropriations act provisions. Among the specific activities given to FEMA in the Post-Katrina Act are the following: leading the nation's CEM efforts (including protection) for all hazards, including catastrophic incidents; partnering with non-federal entities to build a national emergency management system; developing federal response capabilities; integrating FEMA's CEM responsibilities; building robust regional offices to address regional priorities; using DHS resources under the Secretary's leadership; building non-federal emergency management capabilities, including those involving communications; and developing and coordinating the implementation of a risk-based all hazards preparedness strategy that addresses the unique needs of certain incidents. The Post-Katrina Act added 13 responsibilities to those originally set out for FEMA in the HSA, including ensuring first responder effectiveness, supervising grants, administering and implementing the National Response Plan, preparing and implementing federal continuity of government and operations plans (see " Continuity of Government and Operations " below), and maintaining and operating the response coordination center, among others. While implementation of these activities and responsibilities is to build "common capabilities" that will enable the agency to address all hazards through a risk-based management system, the statute also calls for the development of "unique capabilities" that would be needed for events that pose the greatest risk to the nation. In addition to the general responsibilities noted above, the Post-Katrina Act places new authorities intended to address administrative problems identified in the response to Hurricane Katrina within FEMA. The FEMA Administrator is charged with developing a logistics system that will enable officials to track the location of goods and services throughout the transfer process from FEMA to the affected state. The Administrator must also establish a pre-positioned equipment program in at least eleven locations to support state, local, and tribal government disaster assistance operations. To support agency activities, the Administrator must update and improve FEMA's information technology systems to achieve objectives specified in the statute. Also, the Administrator is authorized to disclose information to law enforcement agencies on individuals sheltered or evacuated in order to identify illegal conduct or address public safety concerns, including those involving sex offender notification requirements. The disclosure of this information must be consistent with Privacy Act requirements. The FEMA Administrator has been given new authority that will specifically facilitate disaster response operations. He or she is charged with reaching a formal understanding with non-federal officials on standards for the credentialing of personnel and "typing of resources" needed for the response to a disaster. In addition, the Post-Katrina Act seeks to bolster several of the response teams and related resources through the legislation. Emergency Response Teams are recognized and called on to meet target capability levels, be properly staffed, and in a state of readiness. The Post-Katrina Act also formally authorizes the Urban Search and Rescue teams and sets an authorized level of funding for the system. The act also creates the Metropolitan Medical Response Grant Program and establishes an authorized funding level for the program. A significant addition to the Stafford Act mission in the Post-Katrina Act is the focus on the reunification of families following an event in the form of the National Emergency Family Registry and Locator System and the Child Locator Center. The Post-Katrina Act calls for the establishment of a family registry and locator system within 180 days after enactment. This would be a voluntary system that would be established by FEMA, in collaboration with the Department of Justice, the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), and the American Red Cross. It would be accessible by Internet and a toll-free number and would assist family members and law enforcement in reuniting families. A memorandum of understanding of the working group is to be agreed upon within 90 days of enactment. The Post-Katrina Act also calls on the Administrator of FEMA to assemble a group of federal and non-governmental players to develop a recovery strategy that will summarize existing programs and assess their utility in the post-disaster environment and discuss key issues of funding and authorities in determining the best use of such programs in meeting unique disaster requirements. The strategy should also address rebuilding, particularly those considerations that will lead to more "disaster-resistant" construction and reconstruction. For requirements see the " Report and Guideline Development Schedule " section of this report. To enhance the steady recovery process for the huge event, the Post-Katrina Act also authorizes the establishment of recovery offices in Mississippi, Louisiana, Alabama, and Texas (a Florida office is already in place since the hurricanes of 2004). These offices are intended to encourage the delivery of necessary assistance in a timely and effective manner. The act calls for performance measures including public assistance worksheet completion rates and public assistance reimbursement times. The timing of when these offices will close is left to the discretion of the Director. The Post-Katrina Act also calls for a "Housing Strategy" separate from but related to the "Recovery Strategy" previously noted. The group membership developing this strategy will be similar to that of the housing strategy but will also include advocates for the disabled and their housing needs. This strategy should include a review of housing resources, including those departments and agencies with existing housing stock and also a compilation of housing resources available for disaster victims from governments and non-governmental entities. The strategy should also address the low income and special needs populations as well as housing group sites and the repair of rental housing in the affected area to increase the available stock. For requirements see the " Report and Guideline Development Schedule " section of this report. P.L. 109-295 mandates that the COOP and COG authorities of FEMA "as constituted on June 1, 2006," be transferred to the new agency. The law also requires that the FEMA Administrator prepare and implement "the plans and programs of the federal government for COOP, COG, and "continuity of plans" responsibilities. In addition to these legislative mandates that specifically refer to COOP and COG, the legislation also includes provisions that might arguably be related to or affect implementation of the COOP and COG requirements. For example, one of the four specific missions assigned to the new agency includes the requirement to "integrate the Agency's emergency preparedness ... responsibilities to confront effectively the challenges of a natural disaster, act of terrorism, or other man-made disaster." Also, the Disability Coordinator to be appointed by the FEMA Administrator will be required to interact with specified entities, including "other agencies of the federal government" on "the needs of individuals with disabilities in emergency planning requirements...." While not specifically linked to federal COOP and COG activities, these and other provisions in the legislation might require a reconsideration or evaluation of current procedures. The National Integration Center, established within FEMA, will be responsible for a range of duties concerning emergency preparedness capabilities. NIC is charged with the management and maintenance of both the National Incident Management System (NIMS) and the National Response Plan (NRP). In addition, NIC is responsible for the coordination of volunteer activity with the Corporation for National and Community Service and coordination with state, local and tribal governments concerning the deployment of first responders to disaster sites. The NIC is also charged with the revising and releasing of the Catastrophic Incident Annex and the Catastrophic Incident Supplement to the NRP. The Post-Katrina Act also requires that ten regional offices operate within FEMA, each to be headed by a Regional Administrator. Each Administrator must do the following: work with non-federal partners in the region to ensure that the five CEM components are coordinated and integrated, develop regional capabilities for a "national catastrophic response system," coordinate the establishment of emergency communications capabilities, staff and oversee regional strike teams that comprise the initial response efforts for a disaster and must meet specified criteria and perform specified duties, designate one person responsible for developing regional plans that support the National Response Plan, foster the development of mutual aid agreements in the region, identify gaps in the region concerning the response to individuals with special needs, and maintain and operate a Regional Response Coordination Center. Each Regional Administrator must establish a Regional Advisory Council to provide advice on emergency management issues, identify challenges to any CEM component in the region, and identify gaps or deficiencies. Also, the FEMA Administrator must report to Congress on additional statutory authorities needed to enhance the capabilities of regional strike teams. The statute also establishes area offices for the Pacific and Caribbean jurisdictions as well as for Alaska in the appropriate regional offices. The FEMA Administrator also is responsible for the selection of a Disability Coordinator. This selection is to be made following consultation with appropriate groups including disability interest groups as well as state, local and tribal groups. The Coordinator is charged with assessing the coordination of emergency management policies and practices with the needs of individuals with disabilities, including training, accessibility of entry (both physical and virtual), transportation, media outreach, and general coordination and dissemination of model best practices, including the area of evacuation planning. A related responsibility given to the Director concerns the establishment of a Remedial Action Management Program (RAMP) to be coordinated with both the National Council on Disability and the National Advisory Council. RAMP is to be used to analyze programs and generate after-action reports that are to be distributed to participants in both exercises and real-world events. The RAMP is also responsible for tracking remedial actions as well as long-term trend analysis. In addition, the Coordinator is to work with the FEMA Administrator on the development of guidelines to accommodate individuals with disabilities in emergency response facilities and communications capabilities. The Post-Katrina Act makes other changes to the DHS organization by rearranging certain existing offices, establishing others, and modifying responsibilities. The Preparedness Directorate, with the exception of certain offices, will be transferred to the reconfigured FEMA. The offices now in the Preparedness Directorate that will not be transferred to FEMA include the Office of Infrastructure Protection, the National Communications System, the National Cybersecurity Division, and the Office of the Chief Medical Officer (CMO). The Post-Katrina Act does not indicate whether these four units will constitute a new organizational unit, will become stand-alone offices reporting to the Secretary, or will be subsumed by another organizational entity. The office headed by the Assistant Secretary for Cyber Security and Telecommunications was administratively created by Secretary Chertoff as part of the 2005 DHS reorganization. Entities within this office have included the National Communications System and the National Cybersecurity Division. The Post-Katrina Act establishes a similarly titled office, Assistant Secretary for Cybersecurity and Communications, in statute. The statute does not specify whether or not the National Communications System and National Cybersecurity Division are to be part of this office. The act does establish an Office of Emergency Communications whose director will report to the Assistant Secretary for Cybersecurity and Communications. The office of the CMO was also administratively created by Secretary Chertoff as part of the 2005 DHS reorganization. The Post-Katrina Act establishes the CMO in the department but it does not specify the organizational location of the office within DHS. The CMO will have the primary responsibility within the Department for medical issues related to natural disasters, acts of terrorism, and other man-made disasters. The National Infrastructure Simulation and Analysis Center (NISAC), established by the USA PATRIOT Act, was transferred to the Directorate for Information Analysis and Infrastructure Protection, the precursor to the Directorate of Preparedness, when DHS was established. With the relocation of the Preparedness Directorate to FEMA, the Post-Katrina Act has established NISAC within DHS, without further specification of its organizational location. The act also expands NISAC's authority to include "support for activities related to ... a natural disaster, act of terrorism, or other man-made disaster," and it mandates that federal entities with critical infrastructure responsibilities under Homeland Security Presidential Directive 7 establish a formal relationship with NISAC. The National Operations Center (NOC) is part of the Office of Operations Coordination, an office within DHS separate from FEMA. The Post-Katrina Act establishes NOC, in statute, as "the principal operations center for the Department," but does not specify the organizational location of the center within DHS. The Post-Katrina Act also provides for two other entities not specifically located in DHS. The President is directed to establish a National Exercise Simulation Center, with no specified organizational location. In addition, the act establishes an Emergency Communications Preparedness Center. The center is to be jointly operated by DHS, the Federal Communications Commission, the Department of Defense, the Department of Commerce, the Department of Justice, and "the heads of other Federal departments and agencies or their designees." The new statute also directs the Administrator to establish two emergency locator and reunification services: the National Emergency Child Locator Center, to be located within the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children, and the National Emergency Family Registry and Locator System, at an unspecified organizational location. Most of the organizational developments described above become effective as of March 31, 2007. Others, including the following, became effective upon the enactment of the Post-Katrina Act on October 4, 2006: the increase in organizational autonomy for FEMA; the establishment of a National Integration Center; the establishment of a National Infrastructure Simulation and Analysis Center; the establishment of a Disability Coordinator; the establishment of a National Operations Center; the establishment of a Chief Medical Officer; and the designation of a Small State and Rural Advocate. It could be argued that a provision of the act also eliminated the position of Under Secretary for Preparedness at the time of enactment, but other provisions of the act, and of existing law, cast doubt on this interpretation. (See " Abolished Positions ," below.) Several dozen political appointees and career senior executives head the Preparedness Directorate and FEMA. Four leadership positions in these organizations have been established in statute: the Under Secretary for Federal Emergency Management (also known as the FEMA Director), the Under Secretary for Preparedness, the Assistant Secretary for Grants and Training, and the U.S. Fire Administrator. The provisions establishing these positions do not specify any qualifications that must be met by appointees. The new law abolishes certain statutory positions, establishes several new statutory positions, makes changes to some existing positions, and attaches qualifications to several top leadership positions. These developments are shown, in detail, in Table 1 , and are discussed below. The Post-Katrina Act abolishes the position of Under Secretary for Federal Emergency Management, as of March 31, 2007, and replaces it with the position of FEMA Administrator. It could be argued that the act also abolished the position of Under Secretary for Preparedness, upon the statute's enactment, on October 4, 2006, by striking a subsection of HSA that established the Under Secretary for Information Analysis and Infrastructure Protection (IAIP). This argument rests on an understanding of the evolution of the Under Secretary for IAIP into the Under Secretary for Preparedness. During the reorganizations of DHS undertaken by Secretary Chertoff in 2005 and 2006, the portfolio of the Under Secretary for IAIP was changed, and the position was renamed as Under Secretary for Preparedness. According to this argument, striking the provision establishing the underlying position—Under Secretary for IAIP—would eliminate the position into which it evolved, the Under Secretary for Preparedness. However, a provision of HSA, an appropriations act provision, and another provision of the Post-Katrina Act draw into question whether or not it was the intention of Congress to eliminate this position. The Under Secretary for IAIP was established as an advice and consent position by two provisions of HSA, and one of these is unaffected by the new law. Arguably the position continues to exist by virtue of this provision, even if the other provision is stricken. In addition, it could be argued that a provision of the Department of Homeland Security Appropriations Act for 2007, within which the Post-Katrina Act is nested, envisions a continuation of that office. It provides for "salaries and expenses of the immediate Office of the Under Secretary for Preparedness ...." Finally, the Post-Katrina Act charges the Under Secretary of Preparedness with taking "such actions as are necessary to provide for the orderly implementation of any amendment under" the subtitle reorganizing FEMA. If the position of Under Secretary for Preparedness had been eliminated upon enactment, it seemingly would not be possible to follow the dictates of this section. Under the Post-Katrina Act, the status of the Administrator position as head of the newly configured FEMA will be greater than the Under Secretary for Federal Emergency Management or the Under Secretary for Preparedness. Consequently, the agency will have greater status within DHS than it did prior to the act. Whereas the under secretaries have been compensated at Level III of the Executive Schedule, the Administrator's compensation will be at Level II, the deputy secretary level. In addition, the Administrator will report directly to the Secretary, rather than through another department official, such as the Deputy Secretary of DHS. The new statute also provides that the Administrator is to be "the principal advisor to the President, the Homeland Security Council, and the Secretary for all matters relating to emergency management in the United States," and he or she is to present, to these parties, the range of options when presenting such advice. The act also permits the President to designate the Administrator as a Cabinet member in the event of "natural disasters, acts of terror, or other man-made disasters." Individuals who are selected for the position of Administrator, who are to be appointed by the President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, must meet certain qualifications. (See " Qualifications ," below.) The Post-Katrina Act establishes not more than four deputy administrator positions to assist the Administrator, without specified responsibilities. Appointments to these positions are to be made by the President by and with the advice and consent of the Senate. The act also establishes, within FEMA, the positions of Disability Coordinator and National Advisory Council members, to which appointments are to be made by the Administrator. At the regional level, the act provides for the selection of Regional Advisory Council, Regional Office Strike Team, and Regional Emergency Communications Coordination Working Group members. The act also provides for the establishment of specified Gulf region recovery offices, each with an executive director appointed by the Administrator. In addition, the President is to designate, in FEMA, a Small State and Rural Advocate, newly established by the Post-Katrina Act. The Advocate is to participate in the disaster declaration process and assist small states in the preparation of their emergency or disaster requests, among other activities at the Administrator's discretion. The act also establishes a director of the newly created Office of Emergency Communications, but does not specify the appointing authority for the position. The Post-Katrina Act changes several positions that have already been administratively or statutorily established in DHS. FEMA Regional Administrators were first established when FEMA was created in 1978. The Post-Katrina Act amends HSA to establish 10 Regional Administrators who are to carry out specified responsibilities and to incorporate certain features into the regional offices. The Regional Administrators are to be appointed by the FEMA Administrator, and they must meet specified qualifications. (See " Qualifications ," below.) As previously noted, an Assistant Secretary for Cyber Security and Telecommunications position was administratively created by Secretary Chertoff as part of the 2005 DHS reorganization. The Post-Katrina Act establishes, in statute, a similarly titled Assistant Secretary for Cybersecurity and Communications, without specifying the appointing authority for this position. A Chief Medical Officer, also administratively created during the 2005 DHS reorganization, was established in statute as an advice and consent position upon enactment of the Post-Katrina Act. The act also provides that the U.S. Fire Administrator "shall have a rank equivalent to an assistant secretary of the Department." Some of the Post-Katrina Act provisions that establish positions specify qualifications that appointees must meet. Three of the provisions include qualifications related to the appointee's background and experience. Five provisions list geographic, professional, or other characteristics that must be considered when filling the positions. The person who serves as FEMA Administrator must now meet specific background and experience requirements. The Administrator is to be appointed by the President "from among individuals who have ... a demonstrated ability in and knowledge of emergency management and homeland security; and ... not less than 5 years of executive leadership and management experience in the public or private sector." The President's signing statement for the Post-Katrina Act regarding this requirement indicates a certain degree of contention, as the provision "purports to limit the qualifications of the pool of persons from whom the President may select the appointee in a manner that rules out a large portion of those persons best qualified by experience and knowledge to fill the office." The statement goes on to say that "The executive branch shall construe [the provision] in a manner consistent with the Appointments Clause of the Constitution." The appointee to the position of Chief Medical Officer will also be required to meet certain professional requirements. The new law stipulates that this individual "shall possess a demonstrated ability in and knowledge of medicine and public health." The provision establishing the Regional Administrators positions also sets out specific background and experience requirements. Regional Administrators are to be appointed by the Administrator "after consulting with State, local, and tribal government officials in the region." They are to be appointed "from among individuals who have a demonstrated ability in and knowledge of emergency management and homeland security.... [T]he Administrator [is to] consider the familiarity of an individual with the geographical area and demographic characteristics of the population" served by the office. The five positions that list geographic, professional, or other characteristics that must be considered when filling the positions are the Disability Coordinator, and members of the National Advisory Council, Regional Advisory Councils, Regional Office Strike Teams, and Regional Emergency Communications Coordination Working Groups. The specific requirements for these and other new positions set out in the statute are shown in Table 1 . The Post-Katrina Act includes various statutory authorities to enhance the management and capability of FEMA's workforce, some of which are arguably similar or parallel to federal policies in place long before Hurricane Katrina struck. Among other provisions, the statute directs the FEMA Administrator to develop a strategic plan on human capital for shaping the agency's workforce. The Post-Katrina Act also authorizes the Administrator to pay recruitment and retention bonuses to individuals in positions that are difficult to fill or for which the retention of an employee's considerable skills is essential and to provide for the professional development of employees by rotating them through various positions within DHS. Additionally, the act provides for the establishment of a Surge Capacity Force composed of individuals who will be deployed to respond to natural disasters, acts of terrorism, and other man-made disasters, including catastrophic incidents. These personnel authorities that enhance general federal personnel statutes principally result from the inadequacies in the number, deployment, and qualifications and training of FEMA employees that were exposed during the agency's response to the Hurricane Katrina and Rita disasters. In addition to these enhancements, new personnel or workforce authorities are summarized below. For information on homeland security education, training, and exercise programs, see the " Homeland Security Education Program " section of the report. The FEMA Administrator is to develop a strategic plan on human capital that will be used to shape and improve the agency's workforce. The plan must be submitted to the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs and those committees of the House of Representatives that the Speaker of the House determines are appropriate within six months of enactment. The plan must include three elements: an analysis of gaps in the workforce, plans to address the gaps in critical skills and competencies, and a discussion of FEMA's Surge Capacity Force. The analysis of workforce gaps will assess the following three matters. First, the critical skills and competencies that FEMA will need to support its mission and responsibilities and to effectively manage the agency over the next 10 years. Second, the skills and competencies that the workforce currently possesses and projected trends given expected retirements and other attrition, Third, the staffing levels for each category of employee, including gaps that must be addressed to ensure that FEMA's workforce continues to possess the critical skills and competencies needed. The strategic plan must also include the following four components: (1) goals and program objectives for recruiting and retaining employees including the use of recruitment and retention bonuses; (2) specific strategies and program objectives to develop, train, deploy, compensate, motivate, and retain employees; (3) specific strategies to recruit staff with experience from serving in multiple state agencies responsible for emergency management; and (4) specific strategies to develop, train, and coordinate and rapidly deploy a Surge Capacity Force. The plan of the Force must provide details on the number and qualifications or credentials of DHS and non-DHS employees serving in the Force; the training the members of the Force experienced the previous year; assessments as to whether the Force is able to perform its responsibilities in all disasters, including catastrophic incidents; and descriptions of additional authorities or resources needed to address Surge Capacity Force deficiencies. The strategic plan on human capital must be updated annually by May 1 of each year, 2007 through 2012, and submitted to the appropriate congressional committees. The Administrator's assessment, based on results-oriented performance measures, of the department's and agency's progress is to be included in the plan. The Administrator must ensure that appropriate career paths for the agency's employees are identified. The education, training, experience, and assignments required for employees to progress within FEMA must be included in the information that the Administrator is required to publish on the career paths. All employees must be provided with the opportunity to acquire the education, training, and experience, and as appropriate, participate in the Rotation Program (established under §622(a), discussed below) that will allow them to qualify for promotion. The policy that the Administrator is required to establish on assigning employees to positions must balance the needs of personnel to serve in positions that enhance their careers and those of the agency to have employees serve in a position for a period of time that is sufficient to carry out their duties and to be held responsible and accountable for actions taken. The FEMA Administrator is authorized to pay a bonus of up to 25% of basic pay to recruit individuals for positions that would otherwise be difficult to fill in the absence of such a payment. Bonuses will be paid in accordance with the strategic human capital plan. The Administrator is to determine the amount of the bonus which is not part of basic pay and will be paid in a lump sum. An employee receiving a bonus must enter into a written service agreement with FEMA that must include the required period of service to be completed, the conditions under which the agreement may be terminated before completion of the service period, and the effect of the termination. Individuals in any of three specified types of positions [those appointed by the President and confirmed by the Senate, those in the Senior Executive Service as noncareer appointees, or those excepted from the competitive service on the basis of being confidential, policy-determining, policy-making, or policy-advocating] are not eligible to receive recruitment bonuses. The authority to pay bonuses ends five years after the enactment of Chapter 101. FEMA must submit annual reports to the Senate Committee on Governmental Affairs and those committees of the House of Representatives that the Speaker of the House determines appropriate on the operation of the bonus program for each of the five years that it will be in effect. Each report is to include the number and dollar amount of bonuses paid to individuals holding positions with each pay grade, pay level, or other pay classification, and a determination of the extent to which the bonuses fulfilled their purpose. The FEMA Administrator is authorized to pay a bonus of up to 25% of basic pay to retain an employee whose qualifications or a special need of FEMA makes retention of that person essential. The bonus will be paid on a case-by-case basis and the Administrator must determine that the employee would be likely to leave federal service or take a different position in the federal service in the absence of such a payment. The Administrator is to determine the amount of the bonus, which cannot be part of basic pay and is to be paid in a lump sum. A retention bonus may not be based on any period of service which is the basis for a recruitment bonus. An employee receiving a bonus must enter into a written service agreement with FEMA that includes the following provisions: the required period of service to be completed, the conditions under which the agreement may be terminated before completion of the service period, and, the effect of the termination. Individuals in three types of positions [those appointed by the President and confirmed by the Senate, those in the Senior Executive Service as noncareer appointees, or those excepted from the competitive service on the basis of being confidential, policy-determining, policy-making, or policy-advocating] are not eligible to receive retention bonuses. The authority to pay bonuses ends five years after enactment. The Office of Personnel Management must submit annual reports to the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs and those committees of the House of Representatives that the Speaker of the House determines appropriate on the operation of the bonus program for each of the five years that it will be in effect. Each report is to include the number and dollar amount of bonuses paid to individuals holding positions with each pay grade, pay level, or other pay classification, and a determination of the extent to which the bonuses fulfilled their purpose. The Administrator must prepare a report on vacant positions within FEMA and submit, within three months of enactment, the report to the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs and those committees of the House of Representatives that the Speaker of the House determines appropriate. The report must include data on vacancies by category of positions, the number of applicants for positions which have been announced publicly, the length of time the positions have been vacant, and the time required to fill vacancies. It will also include a plan for reducing both the time required to fill positions and the number of vacant positions, or those anticipated to be vacant. Updates of the report must be submitted to the committees every three months over the next five years and include the Administrator's assessment of FEMA's progress in filling vacant positions. The Secretary is authorized to establish a program that will rotate employees through various DHS positions. The program is to be in accordance with the department's Human Capital Strategic Plan and established within 180 days after enactment. Under the program, DHS employees in mid-level and senior-level positions will have the opportunity to broaden their knowledge by being exposed to various components of the department. The program is to build professional relationships and contacts throughout the department, provide employees with professional opportunities, incorporate the department's human capital strategic plans and activities, address critical deficiencies, and describe efforts to recruit and retain employees and build succession planning. Rotational programs already in effect are to be incorporated, not replaced, by this new initiative. The program will apply best practices, including those suggested by the Chief Human Capital Officers Council and will be administered by the Chief Human Capital Officer (CHCO) of DHS who is to exercise the following eight responsibilities: oversee the programs' establishment and implementation; establish a framework that supports the program's goals and promotes rotations across disciplines; establish eligibility requirements and select participants; establish incentives, including promotions and employment preferences, to encourage employees to participate; ensure that the program provides professional education and training; ensure that the program develops employees who are qualified and capable of being future leaders with broad experience within DHS; provide for greater interaction among DHS employees; and coordinate this initiative with rotational programs already operational in the department. Employees participating in the program are to retain their allowances, privileges, rights, seniority, and other benefits. The Secretary must submit a report on the program's implementation to the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs and those committees of the House of Representatives that the Speaker of the House determines appropriate within 180 days after its establishment. The report is to describe the program, including its use in succession planning and leadership development, and document the number of participants. The Administrator is directed to prepare a plan to establish and implement a Surge Capacity Force to be deployed to disaster sites, including those classified as catastrophic incidents. The plan must be submitted to the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs and those committees of the House of Representatives that the Speaker of the House determines appropriate within six months of enactment. Generally, individuals in the Force will be trained and deployed under Stafford Act authority. If the Administrator determines, however, that these existing authorities are inadequate, he or she will report to Congress on additional and necessary authorities. DHS employees (who are not employees of FEMA) and employees of other federal departments and agencies will be designated by the Secretary to serve on the Force. Individuals capable of deploying rapidly and efficiently to disasters, and others who are full-time employees who are highly trained and credentialed to lead and manage, must be represented on the Force in sufficient numbers. Personnel serving on the Force must receive appropriate and continuous training on FEMA's programs and policies. Force members are not counted against any personnel ceiling applicable to FEMA and may receive travel expenses (including per diem in lieu of subsistence, at rates authorized for other civilian federal employees) when participating in training related to their service on the Force. As soon as practicable after enactment, the Administrator is to develop and implement the procedures for designating employees who are DHS employees (but not employees of FEMA) and non-DHS federal employees to serve on the Force, along with other elements of the plan needed to establish that portion of the Force consisting of these individuals. As enacted by Congress in November 2002, the HSA directed the Secretary of Homeland Security, through the FEMA Director, to improve the Nation's emergency preparedness and response capabilities. Two of the responsibilities set out in the statute were (1) "building a comprehensive national incident management system" to enable federal and non-federal agencies to respond to emergencies, and (2) "consolidating existing federal government emergency response plans into a single, coordinated national response plan." Within months of the enactment of the HSA, President Bush issued Homeland Security Presidential Directive-5 (HSPD-5), which required the DHS Secretary to develop and administer a National Incident Management System (NIMS) and a National Response Plan (NRP). Soon thereafter, the President issued HSPD-8 as a "companion" to HSPD-5 in order to identify the procedures to be followed by federal agencies in preparing for a terrorist attack or significant disaster. HSPD-8 directed the Secretary to develop a national preparedness goal (NPG) applicable to catastrophes regardless of cause ("all-hazards") and to establish readiness priorities and targets that balance the risk of the threats against the resources needed to prevent or respond to catastrophic events. The directive also required that the NPG include readiness metrics and support components that would facilitate assessment of the preparedness efforts for "major events, especially those involving acts of terrorism." Taken together, the requirements for these documents, plans, and components constituted an attempt to guide construction of a national preparedness system (NPS). Roughly one year later, DHS released some of the elements of the nascent NPS. In March 2004, then-Secretary Ridge announced completion of the NIMS document, which established a framework to guide interagency and intergovernmental responses to complex emergencies. The following December, DHS issued the National Response Plan , which assigns specific emergency response functions and activities to federal agencies and the American Red Cross. During 2004 and 2005, DHS released draft, interim, and amended versions of the component documents that provide specific directions or expectations for the NPS. These components included: National Preparedness Goal (not finalized as of 2006), National Preparedness Guidance, Planning Scenarios (15), Universal Task List, and Target Capabilities List. These federal mandates, plans, and directives comprise essential elements of the national system or approach for emergency preparedness and response. In addition, state governments have authorized a range of activities and practices to improve their preparedness capabilities; non-governmental groups have developed assessment systems and preparedness standards towards which agencies aspire. As a supplement to these non-federal efforts, DHS and other federal entities provide financial and technical assistance to state, local, and tribal governments. The Office for Grants and Training (G&T) within DHS (to be transferred from the Preparedness Directorate to FEMA, as summarized in the first section of this report) administers the majority of grants and training provided by DHS. These include such grants as the State Homeland Security Grant Program, the Law Enforcement Terrorism Prevention Program, the Urban Area Security Initiative. All of these efforts, federal and non-federal, are intended to enhance the Nation's preparedness capability for emergency response to terrorist attacks, natural disasters, and accidental events caused by human error or inattention. The Post-Katrina Act requires that the President establish a national preparedness goal and national preparedness system (NPS) and complete, revise, and update (as necessary) the goal to ensure the nation's ability to prevent, respond to, recover from, and mitigate against disasters of all kinds, including acts of terrorism. The goal must be consistent with NIMS and the NRP. Additionally, the President, through the FEMA Administrator, is to establish a National Preparedness System that will enable the nation to meet the National Preparedness Goal. Components of the NPS must include: target capabilities and preparedness priorities, equipment and training standards, training and exercises, comprehensive assessment systems, a remedial action management program, a federal response capability inventory, reporting requirements, and federal preparedness. Existing documents, planning tools, and guidelines are to be used by the FEMA Administrator in establishing the NPG and the NPS to the extent practicable. In implementing the NPS, the FEMA Administrator is to establish an assessment system to continually evaluate the preparedness capabilities of the nation. As part of this system, NPS elements must contain performance metrics and outcome measures. The President, through the Administrator, is authorized (but not required) to include planning scenarios that reflect the risks presented by all-hazards in the NPS. The scenarios, if developed, are to provide a foundation for the development of target capabilities to meet the NPG and must reflect the full range of "representative hazards" that require the identification and definition of tasks required to respond accordingly. The Post-Katrina Act requires the FEMA Administrator, in coordination with others, to complete and update guidelines that are "specific, flexible, and measurable" to define risk-based target capabilities for federal, state, local, and tribal governments. As part of this process, DHS is to conduct terrorism risk assessments that include: variables of threat, vulnerability, and consequences related to population, areas of high population density, critical infrastructure, coastline, and international borders; and current threat assessments available from the DHS Chief Intelligence Officer. The guidelines used in establishing the target capabilities are to include preparedness priorities that balance all-hazard risks with federal, state, local, and tribal resources to prevent, respond to, recover from, and mitigate against the hazards, and requires DHS to support the development of mutual aid agreements between states. In addition, the statute requires that the federal response capabilities inventory be accelerated and that a database be established. The statute also sets out the required contents of the inventory. With specific reference to Department of Defense (DOD) resources, the FEMA Administrator is to coordinate with the Secretary of Defense preparation of a list of organizations and functions within DOD that may be used to support civil authorities. The Post-Katrina Act amends the Stafford Act by requiring that emergency preparedness grants awarded by FEMA to the states be based upon plans that include a catastrophic incident annex modeled after the comparable annex in the NRP. In addition, the state plan annexes must be consistent with the NPG, NIMS, and other plans and strategies. Such state annexes must be developed in consultation with local officials, including regional commissions. Also, the statute requires that within 15 months of enactment, and annually after that, the states that receive DHS preparedness assistance must report on the state's preparedness level. The SAFE Ports Act authorizes the DHS Secretary to make available a risk assessment tool to be used to update required Maritime Security Plans, and correspondingly modifies existing law by directing that grants be distributed based on risk rather than distribution parity. The statute also adds new eligible activities for which such grants may be used, including training or exercises for the prevention of and response to terrorist attacks, establishing terrorist threat information sharing mechanisms, and purchasing equipment needed to manage classified information. The DHS Secretary is to ensure that each grant is used to supplement and support the applicable Area Maritime Transportation Security Plan, and is coordinated with any applicable state or urban area homeland security plan. Any entity subject to an Area Maritime Transportation Security Plan would be an eligible applicant. The act establishes that the bases of the new port security grants will include national economic, energy, and strategic defense concerns identified through the most current risk assessments available. DHS is not the only federal agency responsible for the development, maintenance, and execution of the National Preparedness System (and its components). The Post-Katrina Act requires that the President ensure that each federal agency with NRP responsibilities have capabilities to: meet operational responsibilities of the national preparedness goal, including retaining personnel with decisionmaking authority, creating organizational structures that meet NRP missions, holding sufficient resources, and maintaining command and control communications; comply with NIMS; develop, train, and exercise response personnel; and develop operational plans and corresponding capabilities to respond to all-hazard incidents to ensure a coordinated federal response. The act identifies requirements for NRP operational plans and requires the President to ensure that the FEMA Administrator develops "prescripted NRP mission assignments" for federal agencies. Finally, the President is required to certify compliance of NRP requirements for every federal agency with NRP responsibilities. This provision does not limit the authority of the Secretary of Defense in command, control, or allocation of Department of Defense resources. Although evacuation planning and exercises are not specifically identified as National Preparedness System components, they constitute an integral part of overall national preparedness. The Post-Katrina Act authorizes DHS to approve states' and localities' use of State Homeland Security Grant Program (SHSGP) and Urban Area Security Initiative (UASI) funding for establishing evacuation programs and plans, preparing for the execution of evacuation plans, and conducting evacuation exercises. The act also authorizes the FEMA Administrator to establish evacuation standards and requirements, and the Administrator is required to provide assistance (upon request) to a state, local, or tribal government to assist in the planning of evacuation of hospitals, nursing homes, and other institutions that house individuals with special needs. In another provision, the statute requires that the FEMA Administrator, in coordination with appropriate federal departments, provide evacuation preparedness technical assistance to state, local, and tribal governments. Not only does the Post-Katrina Act address evacuation planning, but the Pets Evacuation and Transportation Standards Act of 2006 (PETS Act) amends the Stafford Act by requiring FEMA to ensure state and local emergency preparedness operational plans (including evacuation plans) take into account the needs of individuals with household pets and service animals prior to, during, and following a major disaster or emergency. The PETS Act also authorizes the FEMA Administrator to provide funding to state and local governments for animal emergency preparedness purposes, including the procurement, construction, leasing, or renovating of emergency shelter facilities and materials that would accommodate people with their pets and service animals that would be used following an evacuation. National preparedness includes homeland security education and training and the associated standards. Federal homeland security education and training programs are varied and are provided by numerous federal agencies and departments. Among these departments and agencies are the Departments of Defense, Energy, Homeland Security, Health and Human Services, Justice, and Transportation, and the independent Environmental Protection Agency. Each department and agency provides specific homeland security education and training targeted to given categories of recipients. Training recipients include federal, state, and local government personnel, emergency responders, and private and public critical infrastructure personnel. The programs train individuals to prepare for, respond to, and recover from terrorist attacks. Some of the training programs are designed for personnel working in critical infrastructure sectors. Others are intended for personnel who are not identified with specific critical infrastructure but respond to terrorist attacks, regardless of location or target. Given the DHS mission to secure the nation from terrorist attacks, the department arguably has primary federal responsibility for providing homeland security education and training to federal, state, and local emergency responders. Accordingly, DHS provides education and training to a wide range of critical infrastructure personnel, law enforcement and other emergency responders, government (federal, state, and local) personnel, and medical personnel. DHS uses numerous agencies, offices, institutes, and partners to provide homeland security education and training for federal, state, and local government personnel. DHS training is provided at such facilities as the Federal Law Enforcement Training Center (FLETC), National Fire Academy (NFA), and Emergency Management Institute (EMI). FLETC is an interagency law enforcement center that provides training for federal law enforcement agencies. The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) administers EMI and NFA training activities. NFA trains fire and emergency response personnel to enhance their abilities to respond to fires and related emergencies. EMI's training program consists of resident and non-resident courses aimed at enhancing emergency management practices. The Office of Grants and Training (G&T) has the primary responsibility within DHS for preparing for potential terrorist attacks against the United States. G&T provides terrorism and WMD training through DHS training institutions and partners that include the Training and Data Exchange Group (TRADE), the National Domestic Preparedness Consortium (NDPC), federal departments, and private and professional organizations. The Post-Katrina Act transfers the Noble Training Center to the Center for Domestic Preparedness, which is part of NDPC. The Noble Training Center trains emergency managers and public health professionals to respond to mass casualty events resulting from natural and man-made disasters. The act also directs the President to establish a National Exercise Simulation Center that will provide catastrophic event modeling and simulation training to elected officials, emergency managers, and emergency response providers at all levels of government. The Post-Katrina Act directs the FEMA Administrator to carry out training programs to implement the national preparedness goal, National Incident Management System, National Response Plan, and other related plans and strategies. This mandate is to be carried out "in coordination with the heads of appropriate federal agencies, the National Council on Disability, and the National Advisory Council." Moreover, when developing and implementing the national program, the FEMA Administrator is to "work with government training facilities, academic institutions, private organizations, and other entities that provide specialized, state-of-the-art training for emergency managers or emergency response providers;" and to "utilize, as appropriate, training courses provided by community colleges, State and local public safety academies, State and private universities, and other facilities." The act also directs FEMA Administrator to carry out a national exercise program "to test and evaluate the national preparedness goal, National Incident Management System, National Response Plan, and other related plans and strategies;" and it sets forth a number of requirements for the national exercise program. The program is to be "as realistic as practicable, based on current risk assessments, including credible threats, vulnerabilities, and consequences, and designed to stress the national preparedness system." It is to be designed, to the extent practicable, "to simulate the partial or complete incapacitation of a State, local, or tribal government." The program is to be carried out, as appropriate, "with a minimum degree of notice to involved parties regarding the timing and details of such exercises, consistent with safety considerations." It is to be designed so as to "provide for systematic evaluation of readiness" and "to address the unique requirements of populations with special needs." The national exercise program is to "provide assistance to State, local, and tribal governments with the design, implementation, and evaluation of exercises" that conform to the requirements noted above; that are "consistent with any applicable State, local, or tribal strategy or plan"; and that "provide for systematic evaluation of readiness." Finally, the act requires the Administrator to perform periodic national level exercises "to test and evaluate the capability of Federal, State, local, and tribal governments to detect, disrupt, and prevent threatened or actual catastrophic acts of terrorism, especially those involving weapons of mass destruction" and "to test and evaluate the readiness of Federal, State, local, and tribal governments to respond and recover in a coordinated and unified manner to catastrophic incidents." These national level exercises are to be performed at least biennially. The FEMA Administrator is also directed to carry out a national exercise program to test and evaluate the plans and systems. The program must be as realistic as practical, based on current risk assessments, and is to be designed to stress the National Preparedness System and to simulate the partial or complete incapacitation of a state, local, or tribal government. Other elements of the exercise program are that it is to be carried out with a minimum degree of notice to replicate a true emergency, be designed to provide for a systematic evaluation of preparedness, address the unique requirements of populations with special needs, be consistent with non-federal strategies or plans, and facilitate an evaluation of systematic preparedness. The statute also requires that DHS conduct a national level exercise biennially to test and evaluate federal, state, local, and tribal government preparedness capabilities. The Post-Katrina Act also requires that the FEMA Administrator enter into agreements with organizations to provide funding to emergency response providers to provide education and training in life support first aid to children. For information on a training program focused on the prevention of fraud, waste, and abuse, see the " Oversight and Accountability " section of this report. In addition to these exercise and training efforts to be carried out by FEMA, the Coast Guard is required to administer training and exercise programs. The SAFE Ports Act requires the DHS Secretary, in coordination with the Coast Guard Commandant, to establish a Port Security Training Program. This training program is to enhance the emergency preparedness capabilities of facility owners who are required to submit an Area Maritime Transportation Security Plan. The SAFE Port Act establishes training standards, and requires that the program be consistent with, and support, NIMS, NRP, the National Infrastructure Protection Plan, the National Preparedness Goal, the National Maritime Transportation Security Plan, and other national preparedness initiatives. Finally, the SAFE Ports Act requires that vessel and facility security plans provide a strategy and time line for conducting training, and that the Coast Guard consult with other DHS agencies and federal departments. In conjunction with the Port Security Training Program, the DHS Secretary, in coordination with the Coast Guard Commandant, is to establish a Port Security Exercise Program. The purpose of this exercise program is to test and evaluate the capabilities of federal, state, and local governments, commercial seaport personnel and management, emergency response providers, and the private sector for all types of hazards. The DHS Secretary is to ensure that, on a periodic basis, port security exercises are conducted at facilities that are required to submit an Area Maritime Transportation Security Plan. Following an exercise, these facilities are to prepare an improvement plan. The statute also sets out a requirement that exercises be scheduled and held at high-risk facilities. In addition to the aforementioned programs, as well as those presently administered by DHS, the Post-Katrina Act directs the DHS Secretary to establish a graduate-level Homeland Security Education Program in the National Capitol Region. This program is to provide homeland security education and training for senior federal, state, and local officials with homeland security and emergency management responsibilities. The program administrator is to use existing DHS homeland security educational resources, and attendees must meet commitment requirements in the statute. The Post-Katrina Act requires that DHS, in coordination with other federal departments and the National Advisory Council, support the development, promulgation, and updating of national consensus voluntary standards for homeland security equipment and training. The national voluntary consensus standards for equipment must meet certain specifications (consistency with the NPG and existing voluntary standards, consider threats not previously contemplated, and focus on attributes such as maximizing operability, efficiency, and safety, among others), while those for training are to be developed by the FEMA Administrator and be consistent with the training actually provided. The Stafford Act authorizes federal assistance for state and local governments, certain nonprofit organizations, and families or individuals after state and local governments are overwhelmed by natural disasters and fires, floods, or explosions, regardless of cause. The statute gives the President the discretion to issue a major disaster or an emergency declaration in response to a gubernatorial request for assistance. Once the President issues a major disaster declaration, the following are among the types of assistance that may be provided (generally by FEMA in conjunction with support provided by other federal agencies) depending upon the scope of the disaster and the needs of the stricken community: technical assistance that saves lives and protects health; public assistance grants to repair or replace public infrastructure and facilities; cash grants to help families and individuals meet immediate and personal needs; financial aid for those made homeless by the disaster, or direct housing assistance in the form of trailers if temporary housing is unavailable; unemployment assistance; loans to communities suffering a loss of tax revenue; crisis counseling; and legal aid for low income victims. The Homeland Security Act of 2002 designates FEMA as the federal entity responsible for administering the Stafford Act. The Post-Katrina Act, along with other laws enacted by the 109 th Congress, significantly amends the Stafford Act by clarifying some sections, waiving previous requirements, and re-working or creating new authorities. The changes to the act reflect experiences gained after Hurricane Katrina and the perceived need for legal remedies to make Stafford Act programs more flexible and responsive to events of a catastrophic nature. While expanding federal assistance authorities, the amendments seek to maintain state, local, and individual emergency management responsibility and accountability. In short, the Post-Katrina Act expands federal disaster assistance authority, but leaves the basic tenets of the Stafford Act (such as Presidential discretion, need for state requests, restrictions on eligibility) unchanged. The Post-Katrina Act authorizes the President to support precautionary evacuation measures and accelerate the delivery of federal emergency response and recovery aid after the President has issued a major disaster or emergency declaration. The amendments expand areas for technical and advisory assistance to address problems of delay and communication identified in Katrina response efforts. The President may provide federal assistance in the absence of a specific request from state officials. If unrequested federal assistance is provided, federal officials must attempt to coordinate the delivery of such aid with state officials; but they must not delay the delivery of needed aid because of the coordination efforts. The Post-Katrina Act addresses several policy areas that direct federal disaster assistance to individuals and families that encounter special circumstances or unique needs in the disaster environment. For example, the act provides authority for the provision of assistance to and accommodation for individuals with disabilities by including the definition of "individual with a disability" from the Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990 in the Stafford Act. The statute also provides that durable medical equipment, such as that needed by those who are disabled, is an eligible form of essential assistance. The statute also requires that the FEMA Administrator develop guidelines within 90 days of enactment concerning the accommodation of individuals with disabilities with regard to emergency facilities and equipment. The Post-Katrina Act also addresses concerns about federal aid to individuals by adding two new population classes—those disabled and those with limited English proficiency—to the discrimination prohibition provisions of the Stafford Act. A related section of the statute amends the Stafford Act by directing FEMA to work with state and local governments to identify groups with limited English proficiency as well as individuals with disabilities or other special needs. The Director of FEMA must ensure that information is made available to such groups before and during a disaster, and must develop and maintain an informational clearing house of model language assistance as well as best practices for the state and local governments working with these individuals. The statute authorizes new types of assistance for those adversely affected by a major disaster. The President is authorized to provide transportation assistance to those displaced from their residences because of a major disaster or emergency, including that needed to move among alternative temporary shelters or to return to their original residence. The President is also authorized to provide case management services to state, local, or qualified private organizations that provide assistance to victims. Also of note, the FEMA administrator is charged with taking specified actions to reunite separated families and help agencies locate missing family members; see the " The New FEMA Missions (Generally) " section of this report. The Post-Katrina Act expands FEMA authority to provide housing assistance after a major disaster through amendments to the Individual and Household Program (IHP) authorized by Section 408 of the Stafford Act. First, in order to be considered eligible for housing assistance, victims of major disasters or emergencies who are disabled now must be unable to access or inhabit their homes, as opposed to the previous provision which required that residences generally be "rendered uninhabitable." Second, alternative housing sites provided to victims must meet physical accessibility requirements. Third, the statute eliminates the statutory ceilings on financial aid to be provided for housing repair and replacement, but does not eliminate the overall cap of $25,000 that may be provided to each individual or household under Section 408. Fourth, the amendments strike the reference to remote areas for FEMA's authority to construct "permanent" housing and adds the phrase "semi-permanent." Fifth, the statute includes as newly eligible housing assistance costs both utility costs (excluding telephone service) and security deposits. The disposal of temporary housing units (generally referred to as "FEMA trailers") is authorized by the statute if the trailers were owned by FEMA on October 4, 2006 (the date of enactment). Such disposal activities are to be coordinated with the Department of the Interior or other federal agencies to facilitate the transfer of the units to tribal governments. The act also established a new initiative to improve the delivery of housing assistance to disaster victims. The Individuals and Households Pilot Program authorizes the President, through the FEMA Administrator, to increase the use of existing rental housing to provide temporary housing for victims of major disasters. Through the pilot program, which expires December 31, 2008, the Administrator is to provide for the repair and improvement of multi-family rental properties in disaster areas to increase the rental stock available to disaster victims in the immediate area. The FEMA Administrator may enter into lease agreements with the owners of multi-family units to achieve FEMA's housing goals, with specified restrictions. Public Assistance (PA) is the Stafford Act term that covers debris removal, public safety activities, emergency protective measures, and infrastructure repair in the wake of a disaster. The Post-Katrina Act expands the universe of non-governmental institutions potentially eligible for assistance by amending Stafford Act definitions provisions and expanding the discretion of the President to determine whether a private nonprofit facility is eligible for Stafford Act Assistance. First, the statute deletes the requirement that eligible private non-profit facilities that serve specified functions (education, utility, irrigation, emergency, medical, rehabilitation, and temporary custodial care) provide "essential services of a governmental nature to the general public." The President now has the discretion to define the facilities that provide such services and the services do not necessarily have to be available only to the general public. Second, the Post-Katrina Act adds the allowance for a second tier of private nonprofit facilities potentially eligible for assistance (museums, zoos, performing arts facilities, community arts centers, libraries, homeless shelters, senior citizen centers, rehabilitation facilities, shelter workshops, and those that "provide health and safety services of a governmental nature") as long as they provide "essential services of a governmental nature to the general public, as defined by the President." The second tier facilities identified in the statute are similar to those set out in the definitions of private nonprofit facilities identified in regulations, not the statute. Another definition change is the addition of the word "education" to the listing in the section that defines critical services, which enables private non-profit organizations to apply directly for a FEMA PA grant without having to apply for a Small Business Administration loan. Another amendment in the Post-Katrina Act concerns the "in-lieu" grants authorized if a state or local government determines that a damaged facility should not be repaired or replaced. The SAFE Ports Act deletes the clause that authorized a 90% in-lieu grant (that is, 90% of the federal share of the estimate of repairing or replacing the facility) solely to areas with soil instability, and increased the amount of the grant that may be provided to any jurisdiction to 90%. Also, the SAFE Ports Act amends the Stafford Act to authorize the President to expedite payments for debris removal to state or local governments or owners of qualified private non-profit facilities. Another form of Stafford Act assistance available to units of local government has been amended. The Community Disaster Loan (CDL) program provides loans to local governments that, because of a major disaster, suffer significant losses in tax revenue. Perhaps most significantly, the legislation authorizes the FEMA Administrator to conduct a PA pilot program intended to provide incentives for local and state government involvement in debris removal and the acceleration of repair work. This program increases the federal share for alternate projects, provides for an increased federal share for debris removal for those local governments that have pre-approved debris and wreckage removal plans and contractual agreements in place prior to the event, and reimburse base wages for state and local and extra hires involved in this work. The pilot project calls on the Director to establish new procedures that provide a financial incentive for the recycling of debris. FEMA must report to the appropriate Congressional Committees on the effectiveness of this program by March 31, 2009. The Post-Katrina Act provides new authority for the FEMA Administrator with regard to state emergency assistance mutual aid agreements. For one, the Administrator is authorized to support the development of mutual aid agreements within the states. Second, the Administrator has new authority to award grants to administer provisions of the Emergency Management Assistance Compact (EMAC). The grants must be used for specified purposes, including implementing recommendations from recent hurricane after-action reports, credentialing and typing emergency responders, administering compact operations, and coordinating with federal and non-federal entities. Also, the FEMA Administrator is required to consult with the EMAC administrator to enhance coordination when assistance is requested. The Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (HMGP), authorized by Section 404 of the Stafford Act, authorizes the President to provide grants to states in which major disasters have been declared. These funds must be used for activities that prevent future disasters or reduce their impact if they cannot be prevented. The Post-Katrina Act adjusts the percentage amounts for HMGP awards by establishing a scale that authorizes a higher percentage (15% of the total Stafford Act assistance in a state) for major disasters in which no more than $2 billion is provided, to 10% for assistance that ranges from more than $2 billion to $10 billion, and 7.5% for major disasters that involve Stafford Act assistance from more than $10 billion to $35.3 billion. The Post-Katrina Act provides the President discretion to appoint one Federal Coordinating Officer (FCO) for a multi-state event. The President also has the authority to appoint deputy FCO's as needed. Traditionally, one FCO has been named for each separate disaster declaration in each respective state. The statute also amends the Stafford Act by requiring that the President designate a Small State and Rural Advocate in FEMA, who is to ensure that rural community needs are met in the declaration process and help small states prepare declaration requests, among other duties. The FEMA Administrator must report to Congress within 180 days of enactment on whether regulations for declarations meet the needs of smaller states and comply with Stafford Act prohibitions on the use of formulas in the declaration process. Other administrative changes concern the authority and capabilities of organizations charged with the response to the major disaster site. The Post-Katrina Act authorizes the President to establish at least three national response teams and others as deemed necessary (including regional response teams) and requires that FEMA team members possess essential capabilities, training skills, and equipment. The SAFE Ports Act amends the Stafford Act by adding a new definition, "essential service providers" to the Stafford Act. Persons who are affiliated with municipal governments or private (profit and non-profit) entities who will help restore essential services to a stricken area are not to be impeded when they seek access to a disaster site. Federal agency heads must comply with applicable federal laws and regulations in implementing this provision. The Post-Katrina Act amends the IHP provisions of the Stafford Act by authorizing search, rescue, care, and shelter of pets and service animals as a type of essential assistance to be provided after a major disaster declaration. Congress is considering legislation that would affect the implementation of two Stafford Act provisions by creating exceptions to standard policy. H.R. 1144 , the Hurricanes Katrina and Rita Federal Match Relief Act of 2007, would ease financial burdens on the states affected by the two named hurricanes by waiving cost share requirements in the Stafford Act and striking a loan repayment provision. While the legislation does not include amendments to the Stafford Act, it might arguably serve as a precedent for future congressional actions or might be modified to include Stafford changes. First, the legislation would waive the Stafford Act cost share requirements for disaster assistance grants awarded because of damages caused by Hurricanes Katrina and Rita in Louisiana and Mississippi. The Stafford Act requires that the federal share of public assistance, debris removal, and emergency assistance grants be at least 75% of eligible costs. The President exercises discretionary authority on whether the federal share will be as much as 100% of eligible costs or in between 75% and 100%. Presidents have historically issued waivers of cost share requirements for the most severe catastrophes; Congress has not previously legislated such waivers. In addition, the Stafford Act mandates that states provide 25% of the cost of the assistance provided to individuals and families. Again, Congress has not previously waived this cost share requirement. H.R. 1144 would result in the waiver of all major disaster cost share requirements for the specified states. Second, besides the cost share waiver provision, H.R. 1144 would amend language previously approved by the 109 th Congress ( P.L. 109-88 ) which authorized higher levels of community development loans (CDL) than normally provided to stricken communities. The statute does not limit the CDL expansion to particular states or disasters. Such loans are provided to help communities provide essential services to citizens and are meant to replace taxes and revenues lost because of major disasters. As originally enacted by the 109 th Congress, the statute required repayment of those loans. Under H.R. 1144 the repayment requirement would be stricken. Contractors played an essential role in the government's response, relief, and reconstruction activities following Hurricane Katrina. However, in the aftermath of the hurricane, several procurement practices came to the attention of Members of Congress, as well as the public. Chief among the issues raised were the dearth of advance (or pre-existing) contracts; the federal government's use of noncompetitive contracts; the proliferation of subcontracting tiers to five or six levels; and the concern that, despite a Stafford Act requirement that a preference be given to local firms for disaster recovery activities following an emergency or disaster, local companies were largely overlooked in Hurricane Katrina contracting. Legislation enacted by the 109 th Congress addressed these procurement issues. The head of FEMA is required to prepare and submit a report to the appropriate congressional committees on recurring disaster response requirements (that is, goods and services) that can be contracted for in advance and those that cannot be contracted for in advance. The Administrator is to use the information compiled for this report in developing and implementing a contracting strategy for FEMA that involves advance contracts and that takes into consideration the local preference set out in Section 307 of the Stafford Act, as amended by P.L. 109-295 . The Secretary of Homeland Security is required to promulgate regulations designed to limit the use of subcontractors or subcontracting tiers on any cost-reimbursement contract, task order, or delivery order that exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold and that facilitates response to or recovery from a natural or man-made disaster, or a terrorist incident. At a minimum, the regulations are to preclude a contractor from using subcontracts for more than 65% of the cost of the contract, unless the Secretary determines the requirement is not feasible or practicable. Agencies that use non-local firms for debris removal, distribution of supplies, and other recovery or reconstruction activities must justify, in writing, the use of non-local companies. Additionally, following the declaration of an emergency or a major disaster, agencies involved in response, relief, and reconstruction activities are required, unless it is neither feasible nor practicable, to transition such work from existing contracts to contracts with local firms, organizations, and individuals. This provision does not require an agency to breach or renegotiate a contract in effect before a disaster or emergency occurs. Agency heads are required to develop requirements to facilitate compliance with Section 307. "Noncompetitive contracts," which are popularly known as "sole source" or "no-bid" contracts, are contracts that have been awarded under other than full and open competition. The Post-Katrina Act requires the Secretary of Homeland Security to draft regulations to limit to 150 days the duration of any noncompetitive contract that is needed to meet an urgent and compelling need, that is in an amount greater than the simplified acquisition threshold, and that facilitates response to or recovery from a natural or man-made disaster or a terrorist incident. For each noncompetitive disaster assistance contract awarded by FEMA, the Administrator is required to submit a report to Congress. The Post-Katrina Act requires that the FEMA Administrator establish and maintain, on the agency's website, a registry of companies that remove debris, distribute supplies, or carry out reconstruction and other disaster relief activities. Inclusion in the registry is voluntary, and contractors will provide information about their businesses for the registry. Federal agencies are required to consult the registry when conducting acquisition planning for the specified emergency relief activities. In the aftermath of the Gulf Coast hurricanes in 2005 Congress passed legislation that, among other purposes, funded oversight activities of the DHS Office of Inspector General (OIG). Such federal offices, which exist in nearly 60 federal establishments and designated entities, exercise independence to carry out their mandate to combat waste, fraud, and abuse. As part of the continuing effort to oversee the expenditure of federal funds in the Gulf Coast, the Inspector General (IG) for DHS has created an in-house position of assistant inspector general specializing in the Hurricane Katrina recovery effort and has taken the lead in coordinating efforts among peers in relevant agencies by means of a "Homeland Security Roundtable." In addition, the Department of Justice has established a Hurricane Katrina Contract Task Force, which includes relevant offices of inspector general, to coordinate investigations and audits in this matter. The prevention of fraud, waste, and abuse in the Gulf Coast recovery effort remains a major congressional concern. The Post-Katrina Act authorizes the Administrator to designate "up to 1 percent of the total amount provided to a Federal agency for a mission assignment as oversight funds to be used by the recipient agency for performing relevant oversight of activities." Agencies are authorized to use funds for specified purposes, including auditing expenditures, assessing agency management control procedures, and reviewing contracts, among others. Funds cannot be used to fund agency oversight activities that are used to monitor funds directly appropriated to the agency for disaster assistance. To the extent practicable, evaluations and audits are to be performed by the IG of the agency that acts upon the mission assignment, but the statute authorizes oversight under contractual arrangements. The statute also requires recipient agencies to develop oversight plans describing the use of the funds and requires preparation of a risk assessment to identify areas with the greatest risk of fraud, waste, or abuse. Federal agencies must report annually to the Administrator and appropriate committees of Congress on the use of the funds. The Post-Katrina Act directs the Administrator to develop and maintain internal management controls of FEMA disaster assistance programs to prevent fraud and waste by collecting information on disbursements to identify applications from persons ineligible for assistance. Databases developed for this purpose are to be reviewed to assure the presence of internal management controls. The statute also requires that the President or his designee develop verification measures to identify eligible recipients of aid under the Individuals and Household Programs (IHP) of the Stafford Act. (For more information on IHP see the " Housing Assistance " section of this report.) The Post-Katrina Act requires that the FEMA Administrator develop and implement a training program to prevent fraud, waste, and abuse of federal funds in response to or recovery from a disaster. (For information on other training programs see the " Education and Training " section of this report.) The Post-Katrina Act includes 16 reporting requirements that must be met by the DHS Secretary, the FEMA Administrator, and officials in other federal entities. These requirements are intended to ensure that Congress receives information on the implementation of specified new policies, among which are those directed at ensuring that a qualified workforce exists, guidelines for enhanced aid to individuals and families are developed, and that preparedness initiatives are undertaken. The following summaries of reporting requirements in the Post-Katrina Act are organized below in two ways. First, the subheadings identify the entity or official assigned responsibility for the report. Second, within each of these subsections, the reporting requirements are listed based upon the time span given administration officials to complete the report, with the earliest required reports identified first. The statute authorizes the FEMA Administrator to pay recruitment bonuses for certain positions. For each of the five years the bonus authority remains in place, the Agency (no specific official identified) is to submit an annual report to Congress detailing the operations of the recruitment bonus program and providing a description of the use of the authority to provide pay bonuses. The statute requires that the Secretary of the department issue reports on department-wide staffing as well as progress made in emergency communications. Within 120 days of enactment the DHS Secretary is to report to Congress on the staff and resource needs the Office of Emergency Communications requires to fully implement the new "Emergency Communications" title of the HSA. The Comptroller General is to review this report and submit findings to Congress no later than 60 days after receiving the DHS report. Within 180 days of the establishment of a rotation program, the DHS Secretary is required to prepare a report that provides a description of the program, the number of participating employees, and the role of succession planning in the program. Within one year of enactment, the DHS Secretary, through the Director of the Office of Emergency Communications, is required to provide Congress with biennial progress reports that describe the findings of the baseline assessment of interoperability issues; evaluate the Department's efforts to enhance the communications interoperability of emergency managers, emergency response providers, and government officials for all hazard events; identify best practices; and evaluate the feasibility of establishing a mobile communications capability modeled on the Army Signal Corps. SAFE Port Act Reporting Requirements . The SAFE Port Act requires that the DHS Secretary (acting through the Coast Guard Commandant) submit a report to Congress no later than 180 days after enactment that describes the methodology used to allocate grant funds. The Post-Katrina Act assigns the majority of the law's reporting requirements to the FEMA Administrator. The reports include subjects such as administrative operations, standards and guidelines, and the lessons learned from new programs and strategies. Within 90 days of enactment the Administrator is to coordinate with the National Advisory Council, the National Council on Disability, the Interagency Coordinating Council on Preparedness and Individuals with Disabilities, and the Disability Coordinator to develop guidelines to accommodate individuals with disabilities. Within 180 days of enactment the Administrator is to provide Congress with guidelines that define the risk-based target capabilities of the federal, state, local, and tribal governments defining their level of preparedness for preventing, responding to, recovering from, and mitigating all hazards. Within 180 days of enactment the Administrator is to submit to Congress a report detailing how disaster declaration regulations meet the needs of the states with populations less than 1,500,000 and how the regulations comply with statutory restrictions on the use of arithmetic formulas and sliding scales based on income and population. Within 270 days of enactment the Administrator is to submit a report to the appropriate congressional committees describing the National Disaster Housing Strategy, and must submit updated reports to Congress when changes are made to the strategy and periodically, but at least once every five years. Within 270 days of enactment the Administrator is to provide Congress with a report on the implementation of improvements to information technology systems. This report is to include a description of actions taken, improvements made, and funding needed for improvements to FEMA's information technology. Within 270 days of enactment the Administrator is to submit to Congress a report describing the National Disaster Recovery Strategy and the authorities necessary to implement the Strategy. Within 270 days of enactment the Administrator is to submit a report to Congress on the status of the Child Locator Center, with details on funding issues, difficulties in establishing the Center, and the status of cooperative agreements. Within 270 days of enactment the Administrator is to submit to Congress a report on the status of the National Emergency Family Registry and Locator System. Within 12 months of enactment the Administrator is required to provide a federal preparedness report to Congress. The report must detail the level of preparedness for all hazards, provide an assessment of how the national preparedness system is supported through federal assistance, include the results of a comprehensive assessment conducted under the Post-Katrina Act, and provide a list of needed resources, projected expenditures, and achievements. No later than March 31, 2009, the Administrator is to submit a report to Congress on the effectiveness of the Public Assistance Pilot Program. The report must include assessments of benefits and costs, the identification of obstacles to debris recycling, and recommendations for further authority. The Administrator is required to prepare and submit to Congress annual catastrophic resource reports. These reports must, among other matters, identify the resources needed to undertake planning, training, regional office enhancement, surge capacity, logistics, state and local preparedness, and responsiveness to the National Response Plan. The Post-Katrina Act mandates that the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) meet one reporting requirement. Within 180 days of enactment the Chairman of the FCC is to submit a report to Congress on the status of the 911 and E911 plans of the state, local, and tribal governments. In addition to the provisions summarized above that directly affect the administration of emergency management, Congress enacted other statutory changes in light of the experiences gained from Hurricane Katrina's impact. The following provisions establish new policies and will be applicable in future catastrophes that meet specified criteria. All provisions of the Post-Katrina Act took effect on the date of enactment (October 4, 2006), except for amendments pertaining to the following, which take effect March 31, 2007: many, but not all, amendments to the Homeland Security Act that set out new or revised FEMA operations, structures, officers, and procedures, and technical and conforming amendments concerning the codification of leadership positions. The statutes enacted by the 109 th Congress contain several authorization provisions. The Post-Katrina Act authorizes funding increases for FEMA for fiscal years 2008 through 2010. Using FY2007 as the base year, the statute augments total agency funding by 10% each fiscal year over the previous year's appropriation. The statute also authorizes appropriations for the Emergency Management Performance Grant (EMPG) program and for the administration of the Emergency Management Assistance Compact (EMAC). EMPG funding of $375 million is authorized for FY2008. EMAC funding of $4 million is authorized for FY2008, and remains available until expended. The SAFE Ports Act authorizes an appropriation of $400 million for each fiscal year from FY2007 to FY2011 for the new Port Security Grant program. The provisions of the Post-Katrina Act do not alter or affect the authorities of the National Weather Service. The Secretary of Education is authorized to waive normal statutory requirements for the repayment of grant assistance if students of higher education institutions are forced to withdraw from the academic program because of disasters. In order to qualify, students must live, work, or receive their education in an area included in a Stafford Act major disaster declaration and must withdraw during the year in which the disaster occurred or the next academic year. The Federal Judiciary Emergency Special Sessions Act of 2005 authorizes circuit courts of appeals and bankruptcy courts to hold special sessions in any place within the United States outside the circuit under emergency conditions. The statute requires that the Committees on the Judiciary of the Congress be notified of a decision to exercise this authority and that reasonable notice be provided to the U.S. Marshals Service. Similar authority is granted to district courts, except defendants must consent to criminal trials held outside the state in which the crime was committed. The John Warner National Defense Authorization Act provides new authority for the calling up and assignment of duties to national guard troops. Members of the Armed Forces reserves who are members of the National Guard and in full-duty status are authorized to perform duties, as assigned, due to the intentional or unintentional release of toxic or poisonous material that does or might result in catastrophic losses. The statute also authorizes the use of such troops in a potentially or actually catastrophic disaster in the United States. In addition, the statute replaces the Insurrection Clause that authorized the President to use "the militia or armed forces" to suppress insurrections. The new provision authorizes the President to use the National Guard to restore public order if a "natural disaster, epidemic, or other serious public health emergency, terrorist attack or incident" prevents state authorities from maintaining public order. In addition, the act authorizes the President to direct the Secretary of Defense to provide specified supplies and equipment, under limitations, to those affected by such situations. Federal officials, and those operating under federal law or with federal funds, may not seize lawfully held firearms, require their registration, or prohibit possession or carrying of firearms in major disaster or emergency conditions, as defined by the Stafford Act. The statute provides for the temporary surrender of firearms in rescue or evacuation vehicles, protects the right of individuals to seek redress, and sets out judicial remedies for individuals. The following terms identify the acronyms used in this CRS report. CDL: Community Disaster Loan CEM: Comprehensive Emergency Management System CHCO: Chief Human Capital Officer CMO: Chief Medical Officer COG: Continuity of Government COOP: Continuity of Operations CORE: Cadre-On-Response Employees DAE: Disaster Assistance Employees DHS: Department of Homeland Security DOD: Department of Defense EMAC: Emergency Management Assistance Compact EMI: Emergency Management Institute FCC: Federal Communications Commission FCO: Federal Coordinating Officer FEMA Trailers: Temporary Housing Units FEMA: Federal Emergency Management Agency FLETC: Federal Law Enforcement Training Center G&T: Office for Grants and Training GAO: Government Accountability Office HHS: Health and Human Services HSPD-5: Homeland Security Presidential Directive-5 HSPD-8: Homeland Security Presidential Directive-8 HSA: Homeland Security Act IHP: Individual and Household Program NDPC: National Domestic Preparedness Consortium NFA: National Fire Academy NIC: National Integration Center NIMS: National Incident Management System NISAC: National Infrastructure Simulation and Analysis Center NOC: National Operations Center NPG: National Preparedness Goal NPS: National Preparedness System NRP: National Response Plan PA: Public Assistance PETS Act: Pets Evacuation and Transportation Standards Act of 2006 Post-Katrina Act: Post-Katrina Emergency Management Reform Act of 2006 RAMP: Remedial Action Management Program SAFE Port Act: Security and Accountability for Every Port Act of 2005 SHSGP: State Homeland Security Grant Program Stafford Act: Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act TRADE: Training and Data Exchange Group

Summary: Reports issued by committees of the 109th Congress, the White House, federal offices of Inspector General, and the Government Accountability Office (GAO), among others, concluded that the losses caused by Hurricane Katrina were due, in part, to deficiencies such as questionable leadership decisions and capabilities, organizational failures, overwhelmed preparation and communication systems, and inadequate statutory authorities. As a result, the 109th Congress revised federal emergency management policies vested in the President; reorganized the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA); and enhanced and clarified the mission, functions, and authorities of the agency, as well as those of its parent, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). Six statutes enacted by the 109th Congress are notable in that they contain changes that apply to future federal emergency management actions. These public laws include the following: Title VI of P.L. 109-295 (H.R. 5441), the Post-Katrina Emergency Management Reform Act of 2006, referred to in this report as the Post-Katrina Act; Sections of P.L. 109-347 (H.R. 4954), the Security and Accountability for Every Port Act of 2005, known as the SAFE Port Act; P.L. 109-308 (H.R. 3858), the Pets Evacuation and Transportation Standards Act of 2006; P.L. 109-63 (H.R. 3650), the Federal Judiciary Emergency Special Sessions Act of 2005; P.L. 109-67 (H.R. 3668), the Student Grant Hurricane and Disaster Relief Act; and Sections of P.L. 109-364 (H.R. 5122), the John Warner National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007. Most of these statutes contain relatively few changes to federal authorities related to emergencies and disasters. The Post-Katrina Act, however, contains many changes that will have long-term consequences for FEMA and other federal entities. That statute reorganizes FEMA, expands its statutory authority, and imposes new conditions and requirements on the operations of the agency. The Administration will implement these new authorities through the FY2008 appropriations legislation. The oversight plans of committees with jurisdiction indicate that Members of the 110th Congress will evaluate the steps taken by the leadership of FEMA to carry out the expanded legislative mandate. In addition, Members will continue to debate legislation pertaining to the recovery of Gulf Coast states. For example, H.R. 1144 would waive disaster assistance cost share requirements for the states affected by the hurricanes. This report will be updated as developments warrant.