Our review of medical records for a sample of newly enrolled veterans at six VA medical centers found several problems in medical centers’ processing of veterans’ requests that VA contact them to schedule appointments, and thus not all newly enrolled veterans were able to access primary care. For the 60 newly enrolled veterans in our review who requested care but had not been seen by primary care providers, we found that 29 did not receive appointments due to the following problems in the appointment scheduling process: Veterans did not appear on VHA’s New Enrollee Appointment Request (NEAR) list. We found that although 17 newly enrolled veterans in our review requested that VA contact them to schedule appointments, medical center officials said that schedulers did not contact the veterans because they had not appeared on the NEAR list. According to VHA policy, as outlined in its July 2014 interim scheduling guidance, VA medical center staff should contact newly enrolled veterans to schedule appointments within 7 days from the date they were placed on the NEAR list. Medical center officials were not aware that this problem was occurring, and could not definitively tell us why these veterans never appeared on the NEAR list. VA medical center staff did not follow VHA scheduling policy. We found that VA medical centers did not follow VHA policies for contacting newly enrolled veterans for 12 veterans in our review. VHA policy states that medical centers should document three attempts to contact each newly enrolled veteran by phone, and if unsuccessful, send the veteran a letter. However, for 5 of 12 newly enrolled veterans, our review of their medical records revealed no attempts to contact them, and medical center officials could not tell us whether the veterans had ever been contacted to schedule appointments. Medical center staff attempted to contact the other 7 veterans at least once each, but failed to reach out to them with the frequency required by VHA policy. For the remaining 31 of 60 newly enrolled veterans included in our review who did not have a primary care appointment: 24 were unable to be contacted to schedule appointments or upon contact, declined care, according to VA medical center officials. These officials said that in some cases they were unable to contact veterans due to incorrect or incomplete contact information in veterans’ enrollment applications; in other cases, they said veterans were seeking a VA identification card, for example, and did not want to be seen by a provider at the time they were contacted. 7 had appointments scheduled but had not been seen by primary care providers at the time of our review. Four of those veterans had initial appointments that needed to be rescheduled, which had not yet been done at the time of our review. Appointments for the remaining 3 veterans were scheduled after VHA provided us with a list of veterans who had requested care. For the 120 newly enrolled veterans across the six VA medical centers in our review who requested care and were seen by primary care providers, we found the average number of days between newly enrolled veterans’ initial requests that VA contact them to schedule appointments and the dates the veterans were seen by primary care providers ranged from 22 days to 71 days. Slightly more than half of the 120 veterans in our sample were seen by providers in less than 30 days; however, veterans’ experiences varied widely, even within the same medical center, and 12 of the 120 veterans in our review waited more than 90 days to be seen by a provider. We found that two factors generally impacted newly enrolled veterans’ experiences regarding the number of days it took to be seen by primary care providers: 1. Appointments were not always available when veterans wanted to be seen, which contributed to delays in receiving care. For example, one veteran was contacted within 7 days of being placed on the NEAR list, but no appointment was available until 73 days after the veteran’s preferred appointment date, and a total of 94 days elapsed before the veteran was seen by a provider. In another example, a veteran wanted to be seen as soon as possible, but no appointment was available for 63 days. Officials at each of the six medical centers in our review told us that they have difficulty keeping up with the demand for primary care appointments for new patients because of shortages in the number of providers, or lack of space due to rapid growth in the demand for these services. 2. Weaknesses in VA medical center scheduling practices may have impacted the amount of time it took for veterans to see primary care providers and contributed to unnecessary delays. Staff at the medical centers in our review did not always contact veterans to schedule appointments in accordance with VHA policy, which states that attempts to contact newly enrolled veterans to schedule appointments must be made within 7 days of their addition to the NEAR list. Among the 120 veterans included in our review that were seen by primary care providers, 37 (31 percent) were not contacted within 7 days to schedule an appointment; compliance varied across medical centers. As a result of these findings, we recommended that VHA review its processes for identifying and documenting newly enrolled veterans requesting appointments and revise as appropriate, to ensure that all veterans requesting appointments are contacted in a timely manner to schedule them. VHA concurred with this recommendation, and indicated that by December 31, 2016, it plans to review and revise the process from enrollment to scheduling to ensure that newly enrolled veterans requesting appointments are contacted in a timely manner. VHA also indicated that it will implement internal controls to ensure its medical centers are appropriately implementing the process. VHA’s oversight of veterans’ access to primary care is hindered, in part, by data weaknesses and the lack of a comprehensive scheduling policy, both of which are inconsistent with federal internal control standards. These standards call for agencies to have reliable data and effective policies to achieve their objectives, and for information to be recorded and communicated to the entity’s management and others who need it to carry out their responsibilities. A key component of VHA’s oversight of veterans’ access to primary care, particularly for newly enrolled veterans, relies on monitoring appointment wait times. However, VHA monitors only a portion of the overall time it takes newly enrolled veterans to access primary care. For newly enrolled veterans, VHA calculates primary care appointment wait times starting from veterans’ preferred dates, rather than the dates veterans initially requested that VA contact them to schedule appointments. (A preferred date is the date that is established when a scheduler contacts the veteran to determine when he or she wants to be seen.) Therefore, these data do not capture the time veterans wait prior to being contacted by schedulers, making it difficult for officials to identify and remedy scheduling problems that may arise prior to making contact with veterans. (See fig. 1.) Our review of medical records for 120 newly enrolled veterans found that, on average, the total amount of time it took to be seen by primary care providers was much longer when measured from the dates veterans initially requested VA contact them to schedule appointments than it was when using appointment wait times calculated using veterans’ preferred dates as the starting point. For example, we found one veteran applied for VHA health care benefits in December 2014, which included a request to be contacted for an initial appointment. The VA medical center contacted the veteran to schedule a primary care appointment 43 days later. When making the appointment, the medical center recorded the veteran’s preferred date as March 1, 2015, and the veteran saw a provider on March 3, 2015. Although the medical center’s data showed the veteran waited 2 days to see a provider, the total amount of time that elapsed from the veteran’s request until the veteran was seen was actually 76 days. Further, ongoing scheduling errors, such as incorrectly revising preferred dates when rescheduling appointments, understated the amount of time veterans waited to see providers. For example, during our review of appointment scheduling for 120 newly enrolled veterans, we found that schedulers in three of the six VA medical centers included in our review had made errors in recording veterans’ preferred dates when making appointments. For example, in some cases primary care clinics cancelled appointments, and when those appointments were re-scheduled, schedulers did not always maintain the original preferred dates in the system, but updated them to reflect new preferred dates recorded when the appointments were rescheduled. We found 15 appointments for which schedulers had incorrectly revised the preferred dates. In these cases, we recalculated the appointment wait time based on what should have been the correct preferred dates, according to VHA policy, and found the wait- time data contained in the scheduling system were understated. Officials attributed these errors to confusion by schedulers resulting from the lack of an updated standardized scheduling directive, which VHA rescinded and replaced with an interim directive in July 2014. As in our previous work, we continue to find scheduling errors that affect the reliability of wait-time data used for oversight, which make it difficult to effectively oversee newly enrolled veterans’ access to primary care. As a result of these findings, we recommended that VHA monitor the full amount of time newly enrolled veterans wait to receive primary care, and issue an updated scheduling directive. VHA concurred with both of these recommendations, and indicated that by December 31, 2016, it plans to begin monitoring the full amount of time newly enrolled veterans wait to be seen by primary care providers. It also indicated that it plans to submit a revised scheduling directive for VHA-wide internal review by May 1, 2016. This most recent work on veterans’ access to primary care expands further the litany of VA health care deficiencies and weaknesses that we have identified over the years, particularly since 2010. As of April 1, 2016, there were about 90 GAO recommendations regarding veterans’ health care awaiting action by VHA. These include more than a dozen recommendations to address weaknesses in the provision and oversight of veterans’ access to timely primary and specialty care, including mental health care. Until VHA can make meaningful progress in addressing these and other recommendations, which underscore a system in need of major transformation, the quality and safety of health care for our nation’s veterans is at risk. Chairman Miller, Ranking Member Brown, and Members of the Committee, this concludes my prepared statement. I would be pleased to answer any questions that you may have at this time. If you or your staff members have any questions concerning this testimony, please contact Debra A. Draper at (202) 512-7114 or draper@gao.gov. Contact points for our Offices of Congressional Relations and Public Affairs may be found on the last page of this statement. Other individuals who made key contributions are Janina Austin, Assistant Director; Jennie F. Apter; Emily Binek; David Lichtenfeld; Vikki L. Porter; Brienne Tierney; and Emily Wilson. This is a work of the U.S. government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. The published product may be reproduced and distributed in its entirety without further permission from GAO. However, because this work may contain copyrighted images or other material, permission from the copyright holder may be necessary if you wish to reproduce this material separately.

Summary: This testimony summarizes the information contained in GAO's March 2016 report, entitled VA Health Care: Actions Needed to Improve Newly Enrolled Veterans' Access to Primary Care , GAO-16-328 . GAO found that not all newly enrolled veterans were able to access primary care from the Department of Veterans Affairs' (VA) Veterans Health Administration (VHA), and others experienced wide variation in the amount of time they waited for care. Sixty of the 180 newly enrolled veterans in GAO's review had not been seen by providers at the time of the review; nearly half were unable to access primary care because VA medical center staff did not schedule appointments for these veterans in accordance with VHA policy. The 120 newly enrolled veterans in GAO's review who were seen by providers waited from 22 days to 71 days from their requests that VA contact them to schedule appointments to when they were seen, according to GAO's analysis. These time frames were impacted by limited appointment availability and weaknesses in medical center scheduling practices, which contributed to unnecessary delays. VHA's oversight of veterans' access to primary care is hindered, in part, by data weaknesses and the lack of a comprehensive scheduling policy. This is inconsistent with federal internal control standards, which call for agencies to have reliable data and effective policies to achieve their objectives. For newly enrolled veterans, VHA calculates primary care appointment wait times starting from the veterans' preferred dates (the dates veterans want to be seen), rather than the dates veterans initially requested VA contact them to schedule appointments. Therefore, these data do not capture the time these veterans wait prior to being contacted by schedulers, making it difficult for officials to identify and remedy scheduling problems that arise prior to making contact with veterans. Further, ongoing scheduling errors, such as incorrectly revising preferred dates when rescheduling appointments, understated the amount of time veterans waited to see providers. Officials attributed these errors to confusion by schedulers, resulting from the lack of an updated standardized scheduling policy. These errors continue to affect the reliability of wait-time data used for oversight, which makes it more difficult to effectively oversee newly enrolled veterans' access to primary care.