sharif2uys/supreme-court-of-pak-judgments huggingface dataset:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PAKISTAN 
(Appellate Jurisdiction) 
 
PRESENT: 
Mr. Justice Maqbool Baqar 
Mr. Justice Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed 
Mr. Justice Amin-ud-Din Khan 
 
 
 
Criminal Petition No.1319-L of 2021  
(Against the order dated 5.8.2021 passed by the Lahore High 
Court Lahore in Crl. Misc. No.450305-B/2021) 
 
 
 
Shahid Aslam 
 
 
 
…Petitioner(s) 
 
 
 
 
 
Versus 
 
 
The State 
 
…Respondent(s) 
 
For the Petitioner(s): 
Mr. Mazhar Iqbal Sidhu, ASC 
 
 
 
 
For the State: 
Rana Abdul Majid,  
 
Addl. Prosecutor General Punjab with 
Bilal Mehmood Sulehri, ASP  and Javed, 
I.O. 
 
For the Complainant: 
Ch. Abdul Wahid, ASC 
 
Mian Ghulam Hussain, AOR 
 
Date of Hearing: 
05.01.2022. 
 
ORDER 
 
 
 
 
Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed, J.:- Shahid Aslam, 
petitioner herein, was earlier booked by Green Town police Lahore 
for issuing a bank cheque in sum of rupees 7 million, bounced upon 
presentation. It is in this backdrop that he settled the issue by 
issuing another cheque in favour of the complainant before a learned 
Judge-in-Chamber of the Lahore High Court Lahore, in consequence 
whereof, he was admitted to anticipatory bail vide order dated 
11.8.2014; the second cheque also failed upon presentation, 
bringing him back once again behind the bars on 14.6.2021.  
2. 
 
Chequered successive failures, notwithstanding, the 
learned counsel contends that the petitioner had cleared up 
substantial portion of his liability, a position though contested at the 
bar, nonetheless, confirmed by Bilal Mehmood Sulehri, Assistant 
Superintendent of Police. 
 
 
3. 
 
Heard. Record perused. 
4. 
 
Be that as it may, what appears to have weighed with 
the learned Judge-in-Chamber to deny post arrest bail to the 
petitioner is his failure to recompense the complainant, a pledge that 
he made before the Court, in lieu whereof, he was extended 
extraordinary concession of pre-arrest bail. The arrangement, 
seemingly under the sword of democles fails to commend our 
approval, inasmuch as, the Court being a neutral arbiter owed 
responsibility to none except the law. Parameters for grant of pre-
arrest bail, by now, are authoritatively well settled, to be followed 
faithfully and, thus, there was no space to be allocated to the 
petitioner to barter his freedom, in derogation thereof; petitioner’s 
unenviable conduct, notwithstanding, nonetheless, does not alter 
the above juridical position.  
 
Charged with an offence that does not attract the statutory 
bar,  the petitioner is in custody since 14.6.2021, continuation 
whereof, is not likely to serve any useful purpose preceding final 
adjudication; as case for his release on bail stands made out. 
Criminal Petition is converted into appeal and allowed; the 
petitioner/appellant is admitted to bail on his furnishing bond in the 
sum of Rs.500,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the 
satisfaction of the learned trial Court. 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
Judge 
 
 
Judge 
 
 
Judge 
Islamabad, the 
5th January, 2022 
Azmat/-
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PAKISTAN 
(Appellate Jurisdiction) 
 
PRESENT: 
Mr. Justice Mushir Alam  
Mr. Justice Yahya Afridi 
Mr. Justice Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed 
 
 
Criminal Petition No.14-Q of 2021  
(Against the order dated 31.12.2020 passed by the High Court of Balochistan 
in Crl. Appeal No.323 of 2020) 
 
 
Naseem Khan 
 
 
…Petitioner(s) 
 
 
 
 
 
Versus 
 
 
The State  
 
…Respondent(s) 
 
For the Petitioner(s): 
Mr. Najeeb Ullah Kakai, ASC 
 
For the State: 
Mr. Abdul Baqar Shah, 
 
Addl. Prosecutor General, Balochistan 
 
Date of hearing: 
31.03.2021. 
 
ORDER 
 
 
 
Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed, J.- Riding on a bike, the 
petitioner was surprised by a contingent of Crime Investigation Agency 
Pashin with 3-k.g. of  cannabis, wrapped in three separate packets, 
concealed beneath the driving seat, on 7.9.2002; along with the 
contraband, he was handed over to the local police; a learned Additional 
Sessions Judge at Pashin, returned him a guilty verdict; convicted 
under clause (c) of section 9 of the Control of Narcotic Substances Act, 
1997, he was sentenced to 3-years R.I. with a direction to pay fine,  
pre-trial period inclusive, upheld by the High Court of Balochistan vide 
impugned judgment dated 31.12.2020, vires whereof, are being assailed 
primarily on the ground that notwithstanding, prosecution’s case that 
the raiding party secured sample from each packet, the forensic report 
relied upon by the prosecution purports a forensic analysis from one 
sample of 5 grams to confirm the narcotic character of the contraband. 
It is additionally argued that the petitioner, an errant youth in his first 
misadventure, deserves in circumstances a benevolent opportunity to 
reform himself so as to rehabilitate in mainstream life to become a 
useful member of the society, a possibility obstructed by his continuous 
stay in prison.  
Criminal Petition No. 14-Q of 2021 
2
2. 
 
Heard. Record perused. 
3. 
 
Though not specifically pleaded, the petitioner figures 
somewhat in the adolescent interregnum with no past history to his 
discredit; prosecution’s claim of possession of 3 k.g. of cannabis 
notwithstanding, the forensic report unambiguously refers to receipt of 
single sample of 5 grams.  
 
Purpose of administration of criminal justice is to ensure that 
majesty of law reigns supreme with peace and equilibrium in the 
society, it is not designed to wreak vengeance; it must provide 
opportunity to the errant to possibly reform himself so as to rejoin 
mainstream life as a useful member thereof. Prosecution’s reliance 
upon a single consolidated sample instead of dispatching three separate 
samples from each bag brings petitioner’s case within the purview of 
clause (b) of the section ibid and, thus, a corresponding reduction in his 
sentence 
is 
an 
option 
most 
conscionable 
in 
circumstances. 
Consequently, petitioner’s sentence is reduced to already undergone by 
him with reduction in fine to Rs.5000/- or to undergo two months SI in 
the event of default. Petition is converted into appeal and partly allowed.  
 
 
 
Judge 
 
 
Judge 
  
 
Judge 
Islamabad, the 
31st March, 2021 
Azmat/-
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PAKISTAN 
(Appellate Jurisdiction) 
 
PRESENT:  
Mr. Justice Manzoor Ahmad Malik 
Mr. Justice Sardar Tariq Masood 
Mr. Justice Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed 
 
Criminal Petition No.140-P of 2014 
(Against the judgment dated 15.10.2014 
passed by the Peshawar High Court, 
Peshawar in Criminal Appeal No.207 of 
2011). 
 
Nazeer Khan 
…Petitioner(s) 
 
VERSUS 
 
The State and another 
…Respondent(s) 
 
 
For the Petitioner(s) 
: Mr. M. Amjad Iqbal, ASC 
 
 
 
For the State 
: Mr. Anis M. Shahzad, ASC 
 
 
 
Date of Hearing 
: 10.06.2019 
 
JUDGMENT 
 
 
Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed, J.-  In the wake of 
absconsion, commencing from January 1992, Nazeer Khan, 
petitioner, accused in a case of  homicide, was finally tried by a 
learned Additional Sessions Judge at Kohat, in the year 2011; 
he stood convicted and sentenced vide judgment dated 
15.3.2011, upheld by a learned Division Bench of the 
Peshawar 
High 
Court 
vide 
impugned 
judgment 
dated 
15.10.2014.  
On the fateful day i.e. 22.1.1992 at about 1.30 p.m., over 
a dispute of land, the petitioner shot Nisar Muhammad, 
whereas his brother, Jan Muhammad, targeted Ghaffar Gul, 
PW; the former succumbed to the injuries leaving behind his 
last declaration pointed upon petitioner’s culpability; his 
brother though exonerated from being in the community of 
intention, nonetheless, was held guilty for murderous assault; 
he was convicted and sentenced without challenge. Upon 
Criminal Petition No.140-P of 2014 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2 
 
petitioner’s arrest, the same prosecution evidence has been 
pressed into service to drive home the charge.  
2.   
Though wounded critically, the last declarant was 
found by the medical officer well within capacity to share 
details of the incident, a narrative found by us as 
straightforward and confidence inspiring besides being in 
harmony 
with 
ocular 
account 
and 
medical 
evidence. 
Petitioner’s absence from law sans any justification. Given 
petitioner’s advance age, he has already been dealt with 
leniently. Impugned judgment being well within the remit of 
law as well as facts applicable thereto does not call for 
interference. Petition is dismissed and leave to appeal refused. 
   
 
 
JUDGE 
 
 
 
JUDGE 
 
 
 
Islamabad, the 
10th of June, 2019 
Ghulam Raza/* 
JUDGE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PAKISTAN 
(Appellate Jurisdiction) 
 
 
PRESENT: 
Mr. Justice Gulzar Ahmed, CJ 
Mr. Justice Ijaz ul Ahsan 
Mr. Justice Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed 
 
 
Criminal Petition No.146-K of 2021 
(Against the judgment dated 25.10.2021 passed by the High Court of 
Sindh Circuit Court Hyderabad in Cr. Bail Application No.S-860 of 
2021) 
 
 
Ameer Maviya alias Maviya and others 
 
 
…Petitioner(s) 
 
 
 
 
 
Versus 
 
 
The State 
 
…Respondent(s) 
 
For the Petitioner(s): 
Mr. Manzoor Ahmed Panhwar, ASC 
 
Mr. Ghulam Rasool Mangi, AOR 
 
with petitioners. 
 
For the State: 
N.R. 
 
Date of hearing: 
25.11.2021. 
 
ORDER 
 
 
 
 Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed, J.- The petitioners, 
accompanied by 5/6 unknown companions, armed with hatchets and 
pistols, allegedly mounted assault, in the backdrop of ongoing civil 
litigation, as a consequence whereof, Parvez Ali and Mashooq Ali PWs, 
endured multiple injuries; the incident occurred on 18.6.2021 within 
the precincts of Police Station Taloka Matli, District Badin; the injured 
were medically examined, purportedly under a police docket, on the 
same day, however, a criminal case were registered as late as on 
01.09.2021, that too, on the intervention of a Justice of Peace.  
 
Petitioners’ plea of false implication and intended arrest with the 
stains of mala fide failed to weigh both with the Court of Session as well 
as the High Court of Sindh.  
2. 
 
Heard. Record perused. 
3. 
 
A detailed plea, argued at inordinate length, hardly merits 
consideration to even obliquely entertain any hypothesis of mala fide in 
an incident that presents a usual run of the mill criminal case. 
Statutory procedures to investigate a crime cannot be held in abeyance 
Criminal Petition No. 146-K of 2021 
2
in a routine without grievously undermining the effective functionality 
of the investigative process, a step essentially to be taken in the face of 
justifiably compelling considerations to thwart the process of law in aid 
of justice, hardly a case in hand. View concurrently taken by the Court 
of Session as well as the High Court, being well within the remit of law, 
calls for no interference. Petition fails. Leave declined.  
 
 
Chief Justice 
 
 
 
Judge 
 
 
 
 
Judge 
Karachi, the 
25th November, 2021 
Azmat/-
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PAKISTAN 
(Appellate Jurisdiction) 
 
 
PRESENT: 
Mr. Justice Mushir Alam 
Mr. Justice Yahya Afridi 
Mr. Justice Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed 
 
 
 
Criminal Petition No.149-K of 2020 
(Against the judgment dated 26.08.2020 passed 
by the High Court of Sindh, Karachi in Criminal 
Bail Application No.S-100/2020) 
 
 
 
 
Kamran Attaullah and another 
 
 
 
 
…Petitioner(s) 
 
 
 
 
 
Versus 
 
 
 
The State  
 
…Respondent(s) 
 
 
For the Petitioner(s): 
Mr. Aamir Mansoob Qureshi, ASC 
 
with Kamran Attaullah and Anwar, in 
person. 
 
For the State:  
Mr. Sajid Ilyas Bhatti,  
 
Addl. Attorney General for Pakistan 
 
Qaiser Masood, Addl. Director (Law) FIA 
 
Khalid Naseem, Inspector, FIA Karachi 
 
Shabbir Chandio, Inspector FIA Karachi 
 
For the Complainant(s):  
Barrister Afzal Hussain, ASC 
 
along with Hasan Munawar, in person, 
assisted by Arslan Binyamin, Advocate  
 
Date of hearing: 
29.09.2020. 
 
ORDER 
 
 
 
Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed, J.- Declined both by the 
learned Special Judge Central-I Karachi as well as a learned Judge-in-
Chamber of the High Court of Sindh, petitioners, Deputy and Assistant 
Directors in the Federal Investigation Agency, respectively, seek leave 
of the Court for bail in anticipation to their arrest in a case registered 
with F.I.A./ACC Karachi; they are accused to have received 
gratification to the tune of rupees 24 millions from one Sheikh 
Muhammad Munawar, arrayed as accused in a financial scam to 
Crl. P. No.149-K of 2020 
2
subtly defraud Utility Stores Corporation to effect a massive sale 
transaction through a fake ISO certification. During the inquiry, 
incriminatory statements of various witnesses were forensically 
confirmed from the computer CDR and ledgers secured from the 
custody of co-accused Abdul Qadir Memon, a front man in the 
transaction; it was on the basis of this comprehensive probe that the 
petitioners braced the impending prosecution.  
2. 
 
Heard. Record perused. 
3. 
 
A detailed parallel story related by the petitioners 
notwithstanding, nonetheless, they were admittedly at the helm of 
affairs to call the shot and thus in a position to rescue the complainant 
from the troubled situation he was trapped; various pieces of evidence 
including forensic data, beyond susceptibility of human interference, 
unmistakably suggest a conduct perfidious to the call of their duty 
hence, prima facie, cognizable. It is by now well settled that the 
accused in a criminal case cannot be granted anticipatory bail to 
subvert or undermine investigative procedure/process that essentially 
include arrest in order to bring the statutory exercise to its logical end 
for effective and meaningful prosecution of the offence through 
collection of information/evidence consequent upon arrest. Mala fide, 
manifestly intriguing upon the intended arrest, is the only justification 
to suspend or divert the usual course of law, a step most extraordinary 
by all means; it is not a case in hand. Petition fails. Leave declined.   
 
 
 
 
Judge 
 
 
Judge 
 
 
Judge 
Islamabad, the 
29th September, 2020 
Not approved for reporting 
Ghulam Raza/-
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PAKISTAN 
(Appellate Jurisdiction) 
PRESENT: 
Mr. Justice Mazhar Alam Khan Miankhel 
Mr. Justice Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed 
 
Criminal Petition No. 1515 of 2020 
(Against 
the 
order 
dated 
04.12.2020 
passed by the Peshawar High Court 
Peshawar in Crl. MBA No.3532-P/2020) 
 
Bilal Khan 
 
 
…Petitioner(s) 
 
 
 
 
 
Versus 
 
 
The State 
 
…Respondent(s) 
 
For the Petitioner(s): 
Mr. Aftab Khan, ASC 
 
For the State: 
Mr. Arshad Hussain, ASC  
 
with Nasir Mehmood Inspector 
Date of hearing: 
25.01.2021. 
 
ORDER 
 
 
 
Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed, J.- On a tip off, Bilal 
Khan, petitioner was apprehended on the wheel of car bearing 
Registration No.LAR/983 at 10:45 a.m. on 14.10.2020 by a contingent 
of  Excise Police Station Peshawar; he was accompanied by Yasir Khan, 
co-accused. Upon search 1200 grams of amphetamine/Ice, concealed 
in a secret cavity was recovered.   
2. 
 
Heard. Record perused. 
3. 
 
Given 
red-handed 
arrest 
of 
the 
petitioner 
with 
a 
considerable quantity of a lethal contraband, confirmed by a positive 
forensic report that brings the case within the remit of ‘Prohibition, 
contemplated by section 51 of the Control of Narcotic Substances Act, 
1997, petitioner’s claim of false implication is an issue that cannot be 
attended without going beyond the scope of tentative assessment, a 
venture prohibited by law. On our own analysis of the record, view 
concurrently taken by the courts below is not open to exception. 
Petition fails. Leave declined.    
 
Judge 
 
 
 
Judge 
Islamabad, the 
25th January, 2021 
Not approved for reporting 
Azmat/-
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PAKISTAN 
(Appellate Jurisdiction) 
 
PRESENT: 
Mr. Justice Umar Ata Bandial 
Mr. Justice Syed Mansoor Ali Shah 
Mr. Justice Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed 
 
 
Criminal Petition No.1549 of 2021  
(Against the order dated 09.12.2021 passed by the Lahore High 
Court Lahore in Crl.Misc. No.66270-B/2021) 
 
 
Rashad Imran 
 
 
…..Petitioner(s) 
 
 
 
 
 
Versus 
 
The State & another  
…Respondent(s) 
 
For the Petitioner(s): 
Mr. Aftab Alam Yasir, ASC 
 
Syed Rifaqat Hussain Shah, AOR 
 
     
 
 
For the State:              
Mr. Ahmad Raza Gillani,  
 
Addl. P.G. Punjab 
 
For Respondent No.2:              In person 
 
 
Date of Hearing          
26.01.2022. 
 
ORDER 
 
 
Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed, J.- Apprehending arrest, 
Rashid Imran, petitioner herein, after failure before the High 
Court, seeks bail in anticipation thereto; he along with co-
accused was intercepted by a Veterinary Officer on 23.6.2021 at 
9:00 p.m. with 500 k.g. beef and  60 k.g. mutton on a meatless 
day. Upon inspection, the complainant found the confiscated 
stuff cold on touch, dark reddish in texture emitting bad smell 
and as such manifestly unfit for human consumption; it carried 
fake stamps as deceit to suggest ante mortem slaughter. Upon a 
complaint, the police registered a criminal case, subsequent 
whereto, the impounded meat was destroyed with magisterial 
intervention.  
2. 
 
Heard. Record perused.  
3. 
 
An inordinate stress laid by the learned counsel on 
the vires of exercise undertaken by the Veterinary Officer Gojra, 
notwithstanding, the seizure of substandard meat, grievously 
Criminal Petition No.1549 of 2021 
injurious for human consumption, on a meatless day i.e. 
Wednesday is established through the inventories of even date. 
Association of a Magistrate further lends credence to the 
procedure adopted. Quantity of confiscation is too considerable 
to be manipulated to set up a fake case, nor there appears any 
earthly reason for the complainant, a State functionary tasked 
with the responsibility of ensuring hygienic livestock supplies to 
the public, to proceed against the petitioner with motives, 
oblique or sinister, a sine qua non to suspend the mechanics of 
criminal law that mandatorily requires arrest in cognizable 
cases, scheduled as non-bailable. Petition fails. Leave declined.     
 
  
 
Judge 
 
 
Judge 
 
 
Judge 
Islamabad, the 
26th January, 2022 
Azma/-
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PAKISTAN 
(Appellate Jurisdiction) 
 
PRESENT: 
Mr. Justice Umar Ata Bandial, CJ 
Mr. Justice Munib Akhtar 
Mr. Justice Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed 
 
 
Criminal Petition No.1596 of 2021 
(Against the order dated 30.6.2021 passed by the High Court of 
Balochistan in Cr. A. No.175-2014) 
 
 
Shams ul Islam Khan 
 
 
 
…..Petitioner(s) 
 
 
 
 
 
Versus 
 
Azhar Ahmed Khan and another  
…Respondent(s) 
 
For the Petitioner(s):               Mr. Naeem Bokhari, ASC 
 
 
    
 
 
For the State:             
Syed Pervaiz Bokhari, Addl. P.G. 
Balochitan 
 
For Respondent No.1:             In person. 
 
Date of Hearing          
07.02.2022. 
 
ORDER 
 
 
        Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed, J.- The petitioner is 
in receipt of a guilty verdict returned by the learned Addl. 
Sessions Judge-IV Quetta in a complaint instituted by Azhar 
Ahmed Khan, no other than his paternal nephew; he alongside 
his brother Saif-ul-Islam Khan, since dead, was indicted for 
depriving female legatees from their shares in the legacy. 
Convicted under sections 466, 467, 474 and 498-A read with 
section 34 of the Pakistan Penal Code, 1860, they were to periods 
of imprisonments ranging from 5 to 10 years with direction to pay 
fine; sentences to be commuted concurrently, pre-trial period 
inclusive, vide judgment dated 20.6.2014. The High Court of 
Balochistan reduced quantum of sentence under section 498-A to 
5-years whereas on the remainder counts, to 1-year, vide 
judgment dated 30.6.2021, leave to appeal wherefrom has been 
prayed for on the grounds that there was no occasion for the High 
Court to decline petitioner’s appeal inasmuch as the prosecution 
had failed to come up with “proof beyond doubt” before the 
learned trial Court; it is next argued that the fate of indictment is 
Cr.P. 1596/2021.  
decisively linked with the outcome of civil litigation still raging 
between the parties. It is lastly argued that both the Court 
escaped notice of Criminal Law (Third Amendment) Act 2011 that 
inserted Chapter XX-A in the Pakistan Penal Code incorporating 
section 498-A w.e.f. the 28th of December, 2011, and, thus, the 
petitioner, according to prosecution’s own case, has been 
convicted in violation of Constitutional protection against 
retrospective punishment. Contentions raised need consideration. 
Leave is granted. Notice shall issue to the State.  
  
 
Chief Justice 
 
 
Judge 
 
 
Judge 
Islamabad, the 
7th February, 2022 
Azmat/-
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PAKISTAN 
(Appellate Jurisdiction) 
 
 
PRESENT: 
Mr. Justice Mazhar Alam Khan Miankhel 
Mr. Justice Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed 
 
 
 
Criminal Petition Nos.1612 of 2021  
(Against the judgment dated 13.12.2021 passed by the Peshawar High Court 
Peshawar in Crl. M. (BA) No.4124-P/2021)) 
 
 
Noor Wali and another  
 
 
 
…Petitioner(s) 
 
 
 
 
 
Versus 
 
The State and another  
 
…Respondent(s) 
 
For the Petitioner(s): 
Mr. Hussain Ali, ASC 
 
Mr. Anis Muhammad Shahzad, AOR 
 
For the State: 
Mr. Shumayl Aziz,  
 
Add. Advocate General KP 
 
Date of Hearing: 
16.02.2022. 
 
ORDER 
 
 
 
 
Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed, J.:- A contingent of 
Pakistan Customs, on a tip off, signaled a Lahore bound bus to halt 
at the check post within the precincts of Police Station Chamkani 
Peshawar; it was being escorted by the assailants riding on two 
vehicles; they ran over the contingent as a result whereof Mian Irfan 
Ullah, 27, sustained serious injuries, subsequently proved fatal. The 
assailants took to the heels, however, the petitioners were 
apprehended by a police party arrived at the scene pursuant to 
information; they have been denied bail, lastly by a learned Judge-
in-Chamber of the Peshawar High Court Peshawar vide impugned 
order dated 13.12.2021, leave to appeal wherefrom is being prayed 
for on a variety of grounds. 
2. 
 
Heard. Record perused. 
3. 
 
We are not impressed by the argument that Irfan Ullah 
Constable was accidently run over by the speeding vehicle as the 
Custom Authorities in anticipation to arrival of the said vehicle with 
Crl Petition No.1612/2021 
 
smuggled contraband on board had set up a blockade, calculatedly 
breached by the petitioners by running over a State functionary, 
standing in the line of duty, a criminal transgression with 
consequences most serious. The smuggled items, taken into 
possession in the wake of gory incident, in retrospect, lends credible 
support to the prosecution case, set up in the crime report. Material 
collected by the prosecution constitute “reasonable grounds” within 
the contemplation of section 497 of the Code of Criminal 
Prosecution, 1898 standing insurmountably in impediment to their 
release on bail, in the absence of any consideration calling for 
further probe. View concurrently taken by the Courts below being 
well within remit of law calls for no interference. Petition fails. Leave 
declined.  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
Judge 
 
 
Judge 
Islamabad, the 
16th February, 2022 
Azmat/-