sharif2uys/supreme-court-of-pak-judgments huggingface dataset:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PAKISTAN 
(Appellate Jurisdiction) 
PRESENT: 
Mr. Justice Mushir Alam 
Mr. Justice Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed 
  
Criminal Petition No.658 of 2020 
(Against the judgment dated 16.04.2020 passed by the 
Peshawar High Court Peshawar in Cr.M. BA No.815-
P/2020) 
 
Tahir Zeb etc. 
…Petitioner(s) 
 
 
 
 
 
Versus 
The State & another  
….Respondent(s) 
 
For the Petitioner(s): 
 
Mr. Arshad Hussain Yousafzai, ASC 
 
 
 
 
 
Syed Rifaqat Hussain Shah, AOR 
 
 
 
 
 
 
For the State: 
Mr. Anis Muhammad Shahazad, ASC (State 
counsel KP) along with Anwar Khan, SI/I.O. 
 
  
For the Complainant: 
Mr. Abdul Ahad Khan, ASC 
Date of hearing: 
25.08.2020. 
 
 
 
 
ORDER 
 
  
Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed, J.- Learned counsel for the 
petitioner does not press this petition to the extent of Tahir Zaib, 
petitioner, to his extent, it stands dismissed.  
2. 
 
It is alleged that on the fateful day i.e. 21.12.2019 at about 
15:30 p.m, the petitioner joined his brother to run over Liaqat Khan 
deceased over a dispute regarding the sale of the same vehicle; Tahir Zaib 
was on the wheel while Shair Zaib petitioner accompanied him on the next 
seat.  
3. 
 
Heard. Record perused. 
4. 
 
It appears that a situation cropped up all of a sudden resulting 
into injuries to the deceased; petitioner’s culpability for being in the 
community of intention on account of his presence on the next seat is an 
issue that in the facts and circumstances of the case can be best settled 
after recording of evidence. An unconventional mode adopted by the  
co-accused to take the life of the deceased and suddenness of the incident 
squarely bring petitioner’s case within the remit of further probe; to his 
extent criminal petition No.658 of 2020 is converted into appeal and 
allowed; he shall be released on bail upon furnishing bond in the sum of 
 
 
 2 
  
  
 
Rs.500,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the 
learned trial Court/duty Judge.  
 
 
 
Judge 
 
 
 
 
Judge 
Islamabad, the 
25th August, 2020 
Not approved for reporting 
Ghulam Raza/-
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PAKISTAN 
(Appellate Jurisdiction) 
 
 
 
PRESENT: 
 
Mr. Justice Mazhar Alam Khan Miankhel 
Mr. Justice Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed 
  
 
Criminal Petition No.691 of 2020  
(Against the judgment dated 3.4.2020 of the 
Peshawar 
High 
Court, 
Peshawar 
passed 
in 
Cr.MBA No.446-P of 2020) 
 
 
Shehryar Khan 
 
.…Petitioner(s) 
 
 
 
 
 
Versus 
 
The State and another 
….Respondent(s) 
 
For the Petitioner(s): 
 
Mr. Asad Ullah Khan Chamkani, ASC 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
For the State: 
 
 
Mr. Anis M. Shahzad, ASC 
 
 
Gul Wali, Inspector/I.O. 
 
For the Complainant: 
Mr. Riazat ul Haq, ASC 
 
Date of hearing: 
03.08.2020. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
ORDER 
 
 
      
 
Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed, J.-   Shehryar 
Khan, 
petitioner, attributed a fatal shot to Sabir-ur-Rehman, deceased, in his 
mid 60s, at 9:30 a.m. on 13.04.2019, within the remit of Police Station 
Daduzai Peshawar, in the backdrop of a dispute over immovable property, 
seeks admission to bail, primarily on the strength of a ‘cross version’ 
structured upon a fire arm injury, sustained by Majid Khan, co-accused, 
no other than his real brother, medically examined under a police docket 
on the fateful day. Petitioner, after the incident, stayed away from law and 
was, accordingly, proceeded under Section 512 of the Code of Criminal 
Procedure 1898; he was finally taken into custody on 12.02.2020.  
2. 
 
Heard. Record perused.     
3. 
 
It would be less than expedient to comment upon the merits of 
the prosecution case, bracing a cross version set up on an injury, 
sustained by the co-accused, pressed into service with vehemence to 
construct hypothesis of self defence, a controversy to be best settled by the 
Criminal Petition No.691 of 2020  
  
 
2
trial Court. Argument regarding suppression of injury sustained by Majid, 
co-accused, in the face of identical suppression in the cross version 
regarding the fatal shot on to the deceased, does not bring petitioner’s case 
at a higher pedestal so as to be received with favour. Saddled with the 
responsibility of the fatal shot, petitioner’s absence from law, additionally, 
stands in impediment to his release on bail. Given the role attributed to 
the petitioner, existence of a cross version, veracity whereof is yet to be 
settled, by itself would not bring his case within the purview of further 
probe. Petition fails. Leave declined. 
 
  
 
Judge 
 
 
 
 
Judge 
Islamabad, the 
3rd August, 2020 
Not approved for reporting 
Ghulam Raza/-
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PAKISTAN 
(Appellate Jurisdiction) 
 
 
PRESENT: 
Mr. Justice Mazhar Alam Khan Miankhel 
Mr. Justice Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed 
 
 
 
Criminal Petition No. 692 of 2020 
(Against the judgment dated 9.3.2020 passed by 
the Peshawar High Court Peshawar in Cr.M.BA. 
No.236-P/2020)  
 
 
Ikhtiar Khan 
 
 
…Petitioner(s) 
 
 
 
 
 
Versus 
 
 
Sarfraz Khan & another  
 
…Respondent(s) 
 
 
For the Petitioner(s): 
Mr. Asad Ullah Khan Chamkani, ASC 
 
For the State: 
Malik Akhtar Hussain Awan,  
 
Assistant Advocate General KPK along 
with Kabir, I.O. 
 
Date of hearing: 
06.08.2020. 
 
ORDER 
 
 
 
Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed, J.- Akbar Khan, Wattey, 
Alamzaib, Khawaja Muhammad, Hidayat Ullah and Misbah Ullah were 
on way to attend proceedings in a Court of Session when the petitioner 
along with co-accused intercepted them at 7:30 a.m. on 13.8.2003 
within the  precincts of Police Station Batgram District Charsadda; in 
the wake of indiscriminate firing, the vehicle boarded by the deceased 
plunged into the nearby canal; none survived the assault; he stayed 
away from law for considerable span of time and surrendered after 
acquittal of some of the co-accused on the strength whereof he sought 
bail albeit with no success.  
2. 
 
 Heard. Record perused. 
3. 
 
Acquittal of some of the co-accused,  has not been received 
as a valid ground for petitioner’s release on bail, both by the Court of 
Session as well as the High Court, a view found by us as 
unexceptionable. Statements of the witnesses supported by medical 
Criminal Petition No. 692 of 2020 
2
evidence and recovery from the spot constitute “reasonable grounds” 
within the contemplation of section 497 of the Code of Criminal 
Procedure 1898, aggravated by petitioner’s inordinate absence going on 
for an age, standing insurmountably in impediment to his release on 
bail, a concession discretionary in nature. View taken by the High 
Court, being well within the bounds of law, does not call for 
interference. Petition fails. Leave declined. 
 
 
 
Judge 
 
 
Judge 
Islamabad, the 
6th August, 2020 
Not approved for reporting 
Azmat/-
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PAKISTAN 
(Appellate Jurisdiction) 
 
 
PRESENT: 
MR. JUSTICE MAQBOOL BAQAR 
MR. JUSTICE MUNIB AKHTAR 
MR. JUSTICE QAZI MUHAMMAD AMIN AHMED 
 
 
Criminal Petition No.73-P of 2021 
(On appeal against the judgment dated 19.03.2021 
passed by the Peshawar High Court Peshawar in 
Cr. Misc. B.A. No.663-P/2021) 
 
 
 
 
Abdul Razzaq 
… Petitioner 
 
 
 
Versus 
 
 
 
The State 
… Respondents 
     
      
For the Petitioner  
: 
Syed Abdul Fayaz, ASC 
 
 
 
For the State 
 
 
For the Complainant 
: 
 
: 
 
Mr. Shumail Aziz,  
Advocate General, KP with Zahid, I.O. 
 
In person. 
 
 
 
 
Date of Hearing 
: 
17.09.2021 
 
 
 
 
 
ORDER 
 
 
 
 
 
Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed, J. – Zahid Shah, 
18/19, was spotted dead on 17.1.2021 within the precincts of 
Police Station Landi Kotal, District Khyber; his uncle Shoqi 
Muhammad reported the incident to police without mentioning the 
accused or motive for the crime. Autopsy conducted at 10:45 a.m. 
on 18.1.2021 noted two firearm entry wounds on the skull, 
inflicted within the preceding 9 to 18 hours; as the investigation 
progressed, the petitioner was hauled up as a suspect on the basis 
of statements of Iqrar Hussain and Roman PWs, recorded as late 
as on 29.1.2021; according to the witnesses, the petitioner  had 
borrowed a .30 caliber pistol which he subsequently returned to 
them; the pistol was produced by the witnesses to the police and it 
was forensically found wedded with the casings, secured from the 
spot. The High Court considered the evidence, sufficient to 
Cr.P.73-P/2021 
 
 
 
 
 
2
constitute “reasonable grounds” and declined bail vide impugned 
order dated 19.03.2021. 
2. 
 
Heard. Record perused. 
3. 
 
Be that as it may, the question as to whether .30 
caliber pistol presented to the police by the prosecution witnesses, 
shown to have ejected casings of the fatal shots can be attributed 
to the petitioner so as to conclusively saddle him with the 
culpability of crime in the absence of any other evidence is 
certainly an issue that needs to be settled after recording of 
evidence. In the school leaving certificate, petitioner’s date of birth 
is recorded as 6.9.2004, bringing his status within the remit of 
juvenility with concomitant concessions available to him under the 
law. Even otherwise, investigation being complete, petitioner’s 
continuous detention is not likely to improve upon prosecution’s 
case; a case for his release on bail stands made out. Petition is 
converted into appeal and allowed; the petitioner/appellant shall 
be released, pending his trial, upon furnishing bond in the sum of 
Rs.500,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction 
of the learned trial Court.  
 
 
JUDGE 
 
 
 
JUDGE 
 
 
 
JUDGE 
Islamabad, the 
17th September, 2021 
Azmat/*
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PAKISTAN 
(Appellate Jurisdiction) 
 
 
PRESENT: 
Mr. Justice Mazhar Alam Khan Miankhel 
Mr. Justice Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed 
 
 
Criminal Petition No.83-P of 2015 
(Against the judgment dated 06.03.2015 passed by the Peshawar  
High Court Peshawar in Cr. A. No.188-M/2012) 
 
State through AG General KP, Peshawar 
 
 
 
…Petitioner(s) 
 
 
 
 
 
Versus 
 
 
 
  
Sabz Ali Khan 
 
 
 
…Respondent(s) 
For the Petitioner(s): 
Ms. Abida Safdar,  
 
 
 
 
Assistant Advocate General, KPK 
 
 
 
 
For the Respondent(s): N.R. 
 
Date of hearing: 
26.07.2021 
 
 
 
 
 
ORDER 
 
 
Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed, J.- Indicted for homicide 
for committing Qatl-i-Amd of Sher Muhammad, within the precincts of 
Police Station  Changlay, District Bonair, the respondent was convicted 
under clause (b) of section 302 of the Pakistan Penal Code, 1860 by a 
learned Additional Sessions Judge vide judgment dated 10.10.2012; he 
was sentenced to death with a direction to pay compensation to the 
legal heirs of the deceased; on the coordinate charge of murderous 
assault on Mushtaq PW, he was sentenced to 7-years RI with 
concomitant monetary compensation; the High Court acquitted him 
from the charges vide impugned judgment dated 06.03.2015, vires 
whereof, are being assailed on the grounds that there was no occasion 
for the High Court to take the impugned view inasmuch as the 
prosecution had successfully driven home charge beyond a shadow of 
doubt on the strength of ocular account furnished by the witnesses that 
included an injured with a massive injury. It is next argued that 
investigative conclusions drawn up pursuant to a prompt recourse to 
law, inexorably pointed towards respondent’s culpability, singularly 
arrayed in the crime report. According to the learned counsel, reference 
by the High Court to peripheral issues and stated durations of time are 
Criminal Petition No.  83-P/2015 
 
 
2
too 
trivial 
to 
override 
the 
preponderance 
of 
evidence 
that 
unambiguously excluded every hypothesis other than respondent’s 
guilt; similarly, according to her, stated lapses on part of the 
Investigating Officer, being inconsequential, certainly does not cast 
away prosecution’s case, otherwise firmly structured on evidence 
furnished by the independent witnesses and, thus, the impugned view 
being artificial warrants interference by the Court in order to avoid 
miscarriage of justice. Contentions merit consideration; leave is granted 
to reappraise entire evidence with a view to secure the ends of justice. 
Send for the respondent through bailable warrants in the sum of 
Rs.200,000/-, returnable to the Assistant Registrar of this Court at 
Peshawar. Station House Officer shall execute the warrants within a 
fortnight.  
 
 
 
  
 
 
Judge 
 
 
Judge 
Peshawar, the 
26th July, 2021 
Not approved for reporting 
Azmat/-
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PAKISTAN  
(Appellate Jurisdiction) 
 
 
 
 
PRESENT: 
MR. JUSTICE DOST MUHAMMAD KHAN  
MR. JUSTICE MANZOOR AHMAD MALIK 
 
Criminal Petition No.888/2015 
(On appeal from the judgment dated 20.10.2015 
passed by the Lahore High Court, Rawalpindi Bench 
in Crl.Misc. No.1787-B/2015) 
 
Naseem Akhtar 
…Petitioner  
Versus  
The State 
..Respondent  
 
For the petitioner: 
Mr. S.M. Ayub Bokhari, ASC 
 
 
 
 
Ch. Akhtar Ali, AOR 
 
For the respondent: 
Raja Inaam Amin Minhas, Spl. Prosecutor, ANF 
 
Date of hearing:  
27.1.2016 
 
 
 
 
  
ORDER  
 
 
  
Dost Muhammad Khan, J.— After arguing the case at 
length, the learned counsel for the petitioner stated that if the Jail 
Authorities are directed to extend all required facilities to the suckling 
baby 
and 
her 
mother 
(the 
accused 
petitioner) 
during 
confinement/detention and the Trial Court is directed to conclude the 
trial within a month, then he will not press this petition.  
2. 
  
We have perceived from the fax massage of the 
Superintendent Jail, Rawalpindi that the petitioner is a suckling baby of 
the age of one year and six months and depends on breast feeding. 
The Superintendant Central Jail, Rawalpindi is directed to ensure that 
the baby shall not suffer due to un-nutrition and all required standard 
facilities be provided to the baby and her mother, which is required in 
such cases, while the Trial Court is directed to conclude the trial within 
one month, after receiving copy of this order. If the prosecution or the 
defense delays in the conclusion of the trial, the Trial Court may resort 
Crl.P.888/15 
2 
to take appropriate action by imposing action and may adopt any 
coercive measure to ensure the conclusion of the trial.  
3. 
  
 If, in case, the trial is not concluded within one month and 
the delay in the conclusion of the trial is not attributable to the 
petitioner or any person, acting on her behalf then, fresh bail petition 
be considered favourable to her, by the Trial Court.  
With these observations, this petition is disposed of.  
 
 
 
Judge 
 
  
 
 
Judge  
 
Islamabad, the   
27th January, 2016 
Nisar /-‘
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PAKISTAN 
(Appellate Jurisdiction) 
 
PRESENT: 
Mr. Justice Mazhar Alam Khan Miankhel 
Mr. Justice Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed 
 
 
Criminal Petition No.90-P of 2016 
(Against the order dated 21.09.2016 passed by the Peshawar High Court Peshawar 
passed in Cr.A. No.404-P/2015) 
 
Asif Khan 
 
 
…Petitioner(s) 
Versus 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
Sher Shah and others 
 
…Respondent(s) 
 
For the Petitioner(s): 
Mr. Muhammad Ajmal Khan, AOR 
 
 
 
 
For the State: 
Mr. Muhammad Nisar, 
 
Additional Advocate General, KP 
 
Date of hearing: 
30.07.2021 
 
 
 
 
ORDER 
 
 
Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed, J.- In the backdrop of an 
ongoing feud, Said Muhammad alias Gulalai was shot dead at 10:55 
a.m. on 5.9.2005 within the precincts of Police Station Umar Zai 
District Charasadda; Ibrahim PW endure the assault with multiple 
gunshot. Sher Shah, Tayyab along with their absconding brother Riaz 
were arrayed as culprits for the crime; the first two were tried by a 
learned Addl. Sessions Judge; they were convicted for homicide as well 
as coordinate charges; they were differently sentenced that included 
penalty of death as well, vide judgment dated 26.04.2015, overturned 
by the High Court vide impugned judgment dated 21.09.2016, vires 
whereof, are being assailed on the grounds that there was no occasion 
for the High Court to let off the respondents in the face of formidable 
evidence establishing their participation in the crime in a daylight affair, 
with one of the accused still away from law. It is next argued that 
though the complainant subsequently died natural death, nonetheless, 
injuries sustained by him during the occurrence stood fully established 
to corroborate ocular account by available witnesses. While taking 
through the impugned judgment, learned counsel has highlighted some 
narrative variations viewed by the High Court as “different versions” to 
argue that descriptive differences hardly affected the preponderance of 
evidence unmistakably pointed towards the culpability of the assailants 
Criminal Petition No.  90-P/2016  
 
2
and, thus, the reasons being artificial, do not present any doubt 
regarding the guilt of the respondents, that may be deduced from the 
record; the bottom line is that impugned view being subjective and 
incompatible with the evidence brought on the record runs counter to 
settled principles of administration of criminal justice and, thus, 
clamours for intervention by this Court to avoid miscarriage of justice. 
Send for the respondents through bailable warrants in the sum of 
Rs.200,000/- each, returnable to the Assistant Registrar of this Court 
at Peshawar. Station House Officer shall execute the warrants within a 
fortnight.     
 
 
 
 
Judge 
 
 
Judge 
Peshawar, the 
30th July, 2021 
Not approved for reporting 
Azmat/-
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PAKISTAN 
(Appellate Jurisdiction) 
 
 
PRESENT: 
Mr. Justice Mazhar Alam Khan Miankhel 
Mr. Justice Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed 
 
 
Criminal Petition No.93-P of 2015 
(Against the judgment dated 04.06.2015 passed by the Peshawar  
High Court Peshawar in Cr. A. No.657-P/2013) 
 
Mst. Rukhsana 
 
 
 
…Petitioner(s) 
 
 
 
 
 
Versus 
 
 
 
  
Rehmanullah and another 
 
 
 
…Respondent(s) 
For the Petitioner(s): 
Mr. Abdul Fayaz Khan, ASC 
 
 
 
 
Mr. Muhammad Ajmal Khan, AOR 
 
 
 
 
For the Respondent(s): Mr. Muhammad Inaam Yousafzai,  
 
Addl. Advocate General, KPK 
 
Date of hearing: 
26.07.2021 
 
 
 
 
 
ORDER 
 
 
 
Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed, J.- Muhammad Islam, 
30/32 and Muhammad Said Ghani Shah, 25/26, were shot dead at 
4:30 p.m. on 2.2.2011 in the backdrop of a previous brawl within the 
precincts of Police Station Rustam, District Mardan; incident was 
reported by Muhammad Inaam PW 5:30 p.m. straight at the police 
station; respondent along with his brother Abid were arrayed as 
accused in the backdrop of a previous dispute over the fodder; latter is 
still away from law; a learned Additional Sessions Judge at Mardan 
convicted the respondent under clause (b) of section 302 of the Pakistan 
Penal Code, 1860 and sentenced him to death on two counts with a 
direction to pay compensation vide judgment dated 13.12.2013, 
overturned by the High Court vide impugned judgment dated 4.6.2015, 
vires whereof, are being assailed on a variety of grounds. It is argued 
that the deceased, both in their prime youth, were brutally done to 
death in broad daylight under unmistakable premeditation within the 
view of witnesses who not only established their presence at the scene 
but also had no axe to grind against the culprits, one of whom is still 
avoiding justice; that each piece of evidence produced by the 
Criminal Petition No.93-P/2015  
2
prosecution is synchronized with the events within the proximity of time 
and space, hardly leaving a room to deliberate a false case or entertain 
any hypothesis of substitution. The bottom line is that ocular account 
and investigative conclusions squarely constituted “proof beyond doubt” 
and, thus, High Court’s disproportionate reliance on the peripheral 
issues purporting inconsequential omissions by the Investigating 
Officer, witnesses’ inability to point out caliber of weapons with 
exactitude and reference to entries in the site plan without their having 
been confronted to the witnesses presents adjudication, diametrically 
incompatible with the settled norms of appreciation of evidence in 
administration of criminal justice and, thus, being artificial tends to 
result in miscarriage of justice, clamouring for intervention by this 
Court. Contentions merit consideration; leave is granted to reappraise 
the entire evidence. Send for the respondent through bailable warrant 
in the sum of Rs.200,000/-, returnable to the Assistant Registrar of this 
Court at Peshawar. Station House Officer shall execute the warrant 
within a fortnight.   
 
 
 
 
  
Judge 
 
 
Judge 
Peshawar, the 
26th July, 2021 
Not approved for reporting 
Azmat/-
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PAKISTAN 
(Appellate Jurisdiction) 
 
 
PRESENT: 
Mr. Justice Sajjad Ali Shah 
Mr. Justice Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed 
 
 
Criminal Petition No.96-K of 2021 
(Against the judgment dated .28.06.2021 passed by the High Court of 
Sindh in Cr. Bail Application No.S-203 of 2021) 
 
 
Ghulam Hyder 
 
 
…Petitioner(s) 
 
 
 
 
 
Versus 
 
 
The State 
 
…Respondent(s) 
 
For the Petitioner(s): 
Mian Taj Muhammad, ASC 
 
Ms. Abida Parveen Channar, AOR 
 
For the State: 
Mr. Hussain Khan Baloch,  
 
Addl. Prosecutor General Sindh 
 
Along with Syed Jafar Shah, DSP Tando 
Allah Yar, Javed Iqbal, SI and Idrees, SI  
 
Date of hearing: 
10.09.2021. 
 
ORDER 
 
 
 
 Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed, J.- The petitioner is in 
the array of accused in a case of homicide wherein one Niaz Ali was 
shot dead during the night of 11th December, 2020 within the precincts 
of Police Station B. Section Tando Allah Yar Khan. It is alleged that 
during the fateful night, the accused six in number, in the backdrop of 
a dispute over water turn, assaulted the deceased; solitary fatal shot is 
attributed to Azhar co-accused; remainder of the accused are blamed to 
have clutched the deceased whereafter he was hit on his forehead, 
bullet exiting from the rear. The petitioner has been declined bail lastly 
by the High Court vide impugned order dated 28.6.2021, leave to appeal 
wherefrom is being prayed for on the grounds that on stated facts the 
accusation called for further probe inasmuch as five persons could not 
have held the deceased without risking their own safety in the face of an 
incoming shot nor there was any necessity for such a dangerous 
exercise when, according to the prosecution itself, the deceased was 
allegedly within the reach of the accused targeting him from a short 
Criminal Petition No. 96-K of 2021 
2
distance. The bottom line is that a wider net is cast to rope the entire 
clan in a midnight affair. 
2. 
 
Heard. Record perused. 
3. 
 
Be that as it may, though named in the crime report 
alongside others of the same brotherhood, the petitioner is assigned role 
of a facilitator by holding the deceased alongside four others; the 
question is as to whether in the facts and circumstances of the case as 
alleged by the complainant himself, such facilitation was at all required, 
that too, without incurring fatal risk of being unintendedly hit by the 
shot in the darkness and as such petitioner’s culpability requires 
further probe within the contemplation of subsection 2 of section 497 of 
the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898, paving way for his release on 
bail, particularly when his continuous detention is serving no useful 
purpose. The petition is converted into appeal and allowed; the 
appellant is admitted to bail on his furnishing bond in the sum of 
Rs.500,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of 
the learned trial Court. 
 
 
Judge 
 
 
 
Judge 
Karachi, the 
10th September, 2021 
Azmat/-