sharick008/convfinqa huggingface dataset:
entergy new orleans , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis results of operations net income ( loss ) 2004 compared to 2003 net income increased $ 20.2 million primarily due to higher net revenue . 2003 compared to 2002 entergy new orleans had net income of $ 7.9 million in 2003 compared to a net loss in 2002 . the increase was due to higher net revenue and lower interest expense , partially offset by higher other operation and maintenance expenses and depreciation and amortization expenses . net revenue 2004 compared to 2003 net revenue , which is entergy new orleans' measure of gross margin , consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related , and purchased power expenses and 2 ) other regulatory credits . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2004 to 2003. .

( in millions ): 2003 net revenue: 208.3
base rates: 10.6
volume/weather: 8.3
2004 deferrals: 7.5
price applied to unbilled electric sales: 3.7
other: 0.6
2004 net revenue: 239

the increase in base rates was effective june 2003 . the rate increase is discussed in note 2 to the domestic utility companies and system energy financial statements . the volume/weather variance is primarily due to increased billed electric usage of 162 gwh in the industrial service sector . the increase was partially offset by milder weather in the residential and commercial sectors . the 2004 deferrals variance is due to the deferral of voluntary severance plan and fossil plant maintenance expenses in accordance with a stipulation approved by the city council in august 2004 . the stipulation allows for the recovery of these costs through amortization of a regulatory asset . the voluntary severance plan and fossil plant maintenance expenses are being amortized over a five-year period that became effective january 2004 and january 2003 , respectively . the formula rate plan is discussed in note 2 to the domestic utility companies and system energy financial statements . the price applied to unbilled electric sales variance is due to an increase in the fuel price applied to unbilled sales. .

Questions:
in 2003, what percentage of the net revenue did entergy's net income represent?
and what was the change in that net revenue from that year to the next?
what was the variation in the volume/weather segment in that period as a portion of this change?

Answers:
3.79%
30.7
27.0%
the grand gulf recovery variance is primarily due to increased recovery of higher costs resulting from the grand gulf uprate . the volume/weather variance is primarily due to the effects of more favorable weather on residential sales and an increase in industrial sales primarily due to growth in the refining segment . the fuel recovery variance is primarily due to : 2022 the deferral of increased capacity costs that will be recovered through fuel adjustment clauses ; 2022 the expiration of the evangeline gas contract on january 1 , 2013 ; and 2022 an adjustment to deferred fuel costs recorded in the third quarter 2012 in accordance with a rate order from the puct issued in september 2012 . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of this puct order issued in entergy texas's 2011 rate case . the miso deferral variance is primarily due to the deferral in april 2013 , as approved by the apsc , of costs incurred since march 2010 related to the transition and implementation of joining the miso rto . the decommissioning trusts variance is primarily due to lower regulatory credits resulting from higher realized income on decommissioning trust fund investments . there is no effect on net income as the credits are offset by interest and investment income . entergy wholesale commodities following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2013 to 2012 . amount ( in millions ) .

amount ( in millions ): 2012 net revenue: 1854
mark-to-market: -58
nuclear volume: -24
nuclear fuel expenses: -20
nuclear realized price changes: 58
other: -8
2013 net revenue: 1802

as shown in the table above , net revenue for entergy wholesale commodities decreased by approximately $ 52 million in 2013 primarily due to : 2022 the effect of rising forward power prices on electricity derivative instruments that are not designated as hedges , including additional financial power sales conducted in the fourth quarter 2013 to offset the planned exercise of in-the-money protective call options and to lock in margins . these additional sales did not qualify for hedge accounting treatment , and increases in forward prices after those sales were made accounted for the majority of the negative mark-to-market variance . it is expected that the underlying transactions will result in earnings in first quarter 2014 as these positions settle . see note 16 to the financial statements for discussion of derivative instruments ; 2022 the decrease in net revenue compared to prior year resulting from the exercise of resupply options provided for in purchase power agreements where entergy wholesale commodities may elect to supply power from another source when the plant is not running . amounts related to the exercise of resupply options are included in the gwh billed in the table below ; and entergy corporation and subsidiaries management's financial discussion and analysis .

Questions:
by what amount did the net revenue decrease from 2012 to 2013?
and what percentage of this amount is due to nuclear fuel expenses?

Answers:
52
38.5%
note 9 . commitments and contingencies operating leases we are obligated under noncancelable operating leases for corporate office space , warehouse and distribution facilities , trucks and certain equipment . the future minimum lease commitments under these leases at december 31 , 2009 are as follows ( in thousands ) : years ending december 31: .

$ 55178: 2011: 45275
2012: 36841
2013: 30789
2014: 22094
thereafter: 59263
future minimum lease payments: 249440

rental expense for operating leases was approximately $ 57.2 million , $ 49.0 million and $ 26.6 million during the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively . we guarantee the residual values of the majority of our truck and equipment operating leases . the residual values decline over the lease terms to a defined percentage of original cost . in the event the lessor does not realize the residual value when a piece of equipment is sold , we would be responsible for a portion of the shortfall . similarly , if the lessor realizes more than the residual value when a piece of equipment is sold , we would be paid the amount realized over the residual value . had we terminated all of our operating leases subject to these guarantees at december 31 , 2009 , the guaranteed residual value would have totaled approximately $ 27.8 million . litigation and related contingencies in december 2005 and may 2008 , ford global technologies , llc filed complaints with the international trade commission against us and others alleging that certain aftermarket parts imported into the u.s . infringed on ford design patents . the parties settled these matters in april 2009 pursuant to a settlement arrangement that expires in september 2011 . pursuant to the settlement , we ( and our designees ) became the sole distributor in the united states of aftermarket automotive parts that correspond to ford collision parts that are covered by a united states design patent . we have paid ford an upfront fee for these rights and will pay a royalty for each such part we sell . the amortization of the upfront fee and the royalty expenses are reflected in cost of goods sold on the accompanying consolidated statements of income . we also have certain other contingencies resulting from litigation , claims and other commitments and are subject to a variety of environmental and pollution control laws and regulations incident to the ordinary course of business . we currently expect that the resolution of such contingencies will not materially affect our financial position , results of operations or cash flows . note 10 . business combinations on october 1 , 2009 , we acquired greenleaf auto recyclers , llc ( 201cgreenleaf 201d ) from ssi for $ 38.8 million , net of cash acquired . greenleaf is the entity through which ssi operated its late model automotive parts recycling business . we recorded a gain on bargain purchase for the greenleaf acquisition totaling $ 4.3 million , which is .

Questions:
what was the net change in value in the rental expense for operating leases from 2008 to 2009?
what was the percent change?

Answers:
8.2
17%
part a0ii item a05 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities our common stock is listed on the new york stock exchange under the symbol 201ctfx . 201d as of february 19 , 2019 , we had 473 holders of record of our common stock . a substantially greater number of holders of our common stock are beneficial owners whose shares are held by brokers and other financial institutions for the accounts of beneficial owners . stock performance graph the following graph provides a comparison of five year cumulative total stockholder returns of teleflex common stock , the standard a0& poor 2019s ( s&p ) 500 stock index and the s&p 500 healthcare equipment & supply index . the annual changes for the five-year period shown on the graph are based on the assumption that $ 100 had been invested in teleflex common stock and each index on december a031 , 2013 and that all dividends were reinvested . market performance .

2013: teleflex incorporated: 100
s&p 500 index: 100
s&p 500 healthcare equipment & supply index: 100
2014: teleflex incorporated: 124
s&p 500 index: 114
s&p 500 healthcare equipment & supply index: 126
2015: teleflex incorporated: 143
s&p 500 index: 115
s&p 500 healthcare equipment & supply index: 134
2016: teleflex incorporated: 177
s&p 500 index: 129
s&p 500 healthcare equipment & supply index: 142
2017: teleflex incorporated: 275
s&p 500 index: 157
s&p 500 healthcare equipment & supply index: 186
2018: teleflex incorporated: 288
s&p 500 index: 150
s&p 500 healthcare equipment & supply index: 213

s&p 500 healthcare equipment & supply index 100 126 134 142 186 213 .

Questions:
what was the change in price of teleflex incorporated from 2014 to 2015?
what is the percent change?

Answers:
19
0.1532
stock performance graph * $ 100 invested on 11/17/11 in our stock or 10/31/11 in the relevant index , including reinvestment of dividends . fiscal year ending december 31 , 2013 . ( 1 ) delphi automotive plc ( 2 ) s&p 500 2013 standard & poor 2019s 500 total return index ( 3 ) automotive supplier peer group 2013 russell 3000 auto parts index , including american axle & manufacturing , borgwarner inc. , cooper tire & rubber company , dana holding corp. , delphi automotive plc , dorman products inc. , federal-mogul corp. , ford motor co. , fuel systems solutions inc. , general motors co. , gentex corp. , gentherm inc. , genuine parts co. , johnson controls inc. , lkq corp. , lear corp. , meritor inc. , remy international inc. , standard motor products inc. , stoneridge inc. , superior industries international , trw automotive holdings corp. , tenneco inc. , tesla motors inc. , the goodyear tire & rubber co. , tower international inc. , visteon corp. , and wabco holdings inc . company index november 17 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 .

november 17 2011: delphi automotive plc ( 1 ): 100
s&p 500 ( 2 ): 100
automotive supplier peer group ( 3 ): 100
december 31 2011: delphi automotive plc ( 1 ): 100.98
s&p 500 ( 2 ): 100.8
automotive supplier peer group ( 3 ): 89.27
december 31 2012: delphi automotive plc ( 1 ): 179.33
s&p 500 ( 2 ): 116.93
automotive supplier peer group ( 3 ): 110.41
december 31 2013: delphi automotive plc ( 1 ): 285.81
s&p 500 ( 2 ): 154.8
automotive supplier peer group ( 3 ): 166.46

dividends on february 26 , 2013 , the board of directors approved the initiation of dividend payments on the company's ordinary shares . the board of directors declared a regular quarterly cash dividend of $ 0.17 per ordinary share that was paid in each quarter of 2013 . in addition , in january 2014 , the board of directors declared a regular quarterly cash dividend of $ 0.25 per ordinary share , payable on february 27 , 2014 to shareholders of record at the close of business on february 18 , 2014 . in october 2011 , the board of managers of delphi automotive llp approved a distribution of approximately $ 95 million , which was paid on december 5 , 2011 , principally in respect of taxes , to members of delphi automotive llp who held membership interests as of the close of business on october 31 , 2011. .

Questions:
what was the regular quarterly cash dividend per ordinary share declared by the board of directors and payable on february 27 , 2014?
and what was that regular quarterly cash dividend payable in each quarter of 2013?
what was, then, the change in this regular quarterly cash dividend from 2013 to 2014?
and what becomes this change when considering the entire year, or four quarters?

Answers:
0.25
0.17
0.08
0.32
table of contents company stock performance the following graph shows a comparison of cumulative total shareholder return , calculated on a dividend reinvested basis , for the company , the s&p 500 index , the dow jones u.s . technology supersector index and the s&p information technology index for the five years ended september 27 , 2014 . the company has added the s&p information technology index to the graph to capture the stock performance of companies whose products and services relate to those of the company . the s&p information technology index replaces the s&p computer hardware index , which is no longer tracked by s&p . the graph assumes $ 100 was invested in each of the company 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index , the dow jones u.s . technology supersector index and the s&p information technology index as of the market close on september 25 , 2009 . note that historic stock price performance is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance . copyright a9 2014 s&p , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . copyright a9 2014 dow jones & co . all rights reserved . apple inc . | 2014 form 10-k | 23 * $ 100 invested on 9/25/09 in stock or index , including reinvestment of dividends . data points are the last day of each fiscal year for the company 2019s common stock and september 30th for indexes . september september september september september september .

september 2009: apple inc .: 100
s&p 500 index: 100
dow jones u.s . technology supersector index: 100
s&p information technology index: 100
september 2010: apple inc .: 160
s&p 500 index: 110
dow jones u.s . technology supersector index: 112
s&p information technology index: 111
september 2011: apple inc .: 222
s&p 500 index: 111
dow jones u.s . technology supersector index: 115
s&p information technology index: 115
september 2012: apple inc .: 367
s&p 500 index: 145
dow jones u.s . technology supersector index: 150
s&p information technology index: 152
september 2013: apple inc .: 272
s&p 500 index: 173
dow jones u.s . technology supersector index: 158
s&p information technology index: 163
september 2014: apple inc .: 407
s&p 500 index: 207
dow jones u.s . technology supersector index: 205
s&p information technology index: 210

.

Questions:
what was the net change in value of apple inc. from 2009 to 2014?
what is the percent change?

Answers:
307
307%
table of contents stock performance graph * $ 100 invested on 11/17/11 in our stock or 10/31/11 in the relevant index , including reinvestment of dividends . fiscal year ending december 31 , 2015 . ( 1 ) delphi automotive plc ( 2 ) s&p 500 2013 standard & poor 2019s 500 total return index ( 3 ) automotive supplier peer group 2013 russell 3000 auto parts index , including american axle & manufacturing , borgwarner inc. , cooper tire & rubber company , dana holding corp. , delphi automotive plc , dorman products inc. , federal-mogul corp. , ford motor co. , fuel systems solutions inc. , general motors co. , gentex corp. , gentherm inc. , genuine parts co. , johnson controls inc. , lear corp. , lkq corp. , meritor inc. , standard motor products inc. , stoneridge inc. , superior industries international , tenneco inc. , tesla motors inc. , the goodyear tire & rubber co. , tower international inc. , visteon corp. , and wabco holdings inc . company index november 17 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 .

november 17 2011: delphi automotive plc ( 1 ): 100
s&p 500 ( 2 ): 100
automotive supplier peer group ( 3 ): 100
december 31 2011: delphi automotive plc ( 1 ): 100.98
s&p 500 ( 2 ): 100.8
automotive supplier peer group ( 3 ): 89.62
december 31 2012: delphi automotive plc ( 1 ): 179.33
s&p 500 ( 2 ): 116.93
automotive supplier peer group ( 3 ): 109.96
december 31 2013: delphi automotive plc ( 1 ): 285.81
s&p 500 ( 2 ): 154.8
automotive supplier peer group ( 3 ): 166.26
december 31 2014: delphi automotive plc ( 1 ): 350.82
s&p 500 ( 2 ): 175.99
automotive supplier peer group ( 3 ): 176.25
december 31 2015: delphi automotive plc ( 1 ): 418.67
s&p 500 ( 2 ): 178.43
automotive supplier peer group ( 3 ): 171.91

dividends the company has declared and paid cash dividends of $ 0.25 per ordinary share in each quarter of 2014 and 2015 . in addition , in january 2016 , the board of directors increased the annual dividend rate to $ 1.16 per ordinary share , and declared a regular quarterly cash dividend of $ 0.29 per ordinary share , payable on february 29 , 2016 to shareholders of record at the close of business on february 17 , 2016. .

Questions:
what is the value of an $100 investment in delphi automotive plc in 2015?
what is the net increase?
what is the net increase in a $100 investment in automotive supplier peer group from 2011 to 2015?
what is the rate of return for delphi automotive plc?
what about for automotive supplier peer group?
what is the difference in these rates?

Answers:
418.67
318.67
71.91
318.67%
71.91%
246.76%
other expense , net : the company's other expense consists of the following: .

year ended december 31 , 2013: foreign currency losses net: -1115
other income ( expense ) net: 69
total other expense net: -1046
year ended december 31 , 2012: foreign currency losses net: -1401
other income ( expense ) net: -4
total other expense net: -1405

income tax provision : the company recorded income tax expense of $ 77.2 million and had income before income taxes of $ 322.5 million for the year ended december 31 , 2013 , representing an effective tax rate of 23.9% ( 23.9 % ) . during the year ended december 31 , 2012 , the company recorded income tax expense of $ 90.1 million and had income before income taxes of $ 293.5 million , representing an effective tax rate of 30.7% ( 30.7 % ) . in december 2013 , the company received notice from the irs that the joint committee on taxation took no exception to the company's tax returns that were filed for 2009 and 2010 . an $ 11.0 million tax benefit was recognized in the company's 2013 financial results as the company had effectively settled uncertainty regarding the realization of refund claims filed in connection with the 2009 and 2010 returns . in the u.s. , which is the largest jurisdiction where the company receives such a tax credit , the availability of the research and development credit expired at the end of the 2011 tax year . in january 2013 , the u.s . congress passed legislation that reinstated the research and development credit retroactive to 2012 . the income tax provision for the year ended december 31 , 2013 includes approximately $ 2.3 million related to the reinstated research and development credit for 2012 activity . the decrease in the effective tax rate from the prior year is primarily due to the release of an uncertain tax position mentioned above , the reinstatement of the u.s . research and development credit mentioned above , and cash repatriation activities . when compared to the federal and state combined statutory rate , the effective tax rates for the years ended december 31 , 2013 and 2012 were favorably impacted by lower statutory tax rates in many of the company 2019s foreign jurisdictions , the domestic manufacturing deduction and tax benefits associated with the merger of the company 2019s japan subsidiaries in 2010 . net income : the company 2019s net income for the year ended december 31 , 2013 was $ 245.3 million as compared to net income of $ 203.5 million for the year ended december 31 , 2012 . diluted earnings per share was $ 2.58 for the year ended december 31 , 2013 and $ 2.14 for the year ended december 31 , 2012 . the weighted average shares used in computing diluted earnings per share were 95.1 million and 95.0 million for the years ended december 31 , 2013 and 2012 , respectively . table of contents .

Questions:
what was the net change in value of net income from 2012 to 2013?
what was net income in 2012?
what is the percent change?

Answers:
41.8
203.5
20.5%
.

12/07: fidelity national information services inc .: 100
s&p 500: 100
s&p supercap data processing & outsourced services: 100
12/08: fidelity national information services inc .: 70.08
s&p 500: 63
s&p supercap data processing & outsourced services: 68.26
12/09: fidelity national information services inc .: 101.93
s&p 500: 79.67
s&p supercap data processing & outsourced services: 99.41
12/10: fidelity national information services inc .: 120.01
s&p 500: 91.67
s&p supercap data processing & outsourced services: 97.33
12/11: fidelity national information services inc .: 117.34
s&p 500: 93.61
s&p supercap data processing & outsourced services: 118.68
12/12: fidelity national information services inc .: 157.38
s&p 500: 108.59
s&p supercap data processing & outsourced services: 151.9

s&p supercap data processing & outsourced 100.00 68.26 99.41 97.33 118.68 151.90 item 6 . selected financial data . the selected financial data set forth below constitutes historical financial data of fis and should be read in conjunction with item 7 , management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations , and item 8 , financial statements and supplementary data , included elsewhere in this report . on october 1 , 2009 , we completed the acquisition of metavante technologies , inc . ( "metavante" ) . the results of operations and financial position of metavante are included in the consolidated financial statements since the date of acquisition . on july 2 , 2008 , we completed the spin-off of lender processing services , inc. , which was a former wholly-owned subsidiary ( "lps" ) . for accounting purposes , the results of lps are presented as discontinued operations . accordingly , all prior periods have been restated to present the results of fis on a stand alone basis and include the results of lps up to july 2 , 2008 , as discontinued operations. .

Questions:
what was the variation in the value of the fidelity national information services inc . from 2007 to 2012?
and what is this variation as a percentage of that value in 2007?
in that same period, what was that variation for the s&p 500?
and what percentage did this variation represent in relation to the value of this stock in 2007?
what was, then, the difference between the fidelity national information services inc . percentage variation and this s&p 500 one?

Answers:
57.38
57.38%
8.59
8.59%
48.79%