sharick008/convfinqa huggingface dataset:
( 1 ) includes shares repurchased through our publicly announced share repurchase program and shares tendered to pay the exercise price and tax withholding on employee stock options . shareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the securities and exchange commission , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates such information by reference into such filing . the following graph shows a five-year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the s&p 500 index , and the dow jones transportation average . the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2004 in the s&p 500 index , the dow jones transportation average , and our class b common stock . comparison of five year cumulative total return $ 40.00 $ 60.00 $ 80.00 $ 100.00 $ 120.00 $ 140.00 $ 160.00 2004 20092008200720062005 s&p 500 ups dj transport .

12/31/04: united parcel service inc .: 100
s&p 500 index: 100
dow jones transportation average: 100
12/31/05: united parcel service inc .: 89.49
s&p 500 index: 104.91
dow jones transportation average: 111.65
12/31/06: united parcel service inc .: 91.06
s&p 500 index: 121.48
dow jones transportation average: 122.61
12/31/07: united parcel service inc .: 87.88
s&p 500 index: 128.15
dow jones transportation average: 124.35
12/31/08: united parcel service inc .: 70.48
s&p 500 index: 80.74
dow jones transportation average: 97.72
12/31/09: united parcel service inc .: 75.95
s&p 500 index: 102.11
dow jones transportation average: 115.88

.

Questions:
what was the change in the performance of the united parcel service inc . from 2004 to 2009?
and how much does this change represent in relation to that performance in 2004, in percentage?
what was the performance value of the s&p 500 index in 2009?
what was, then, the change in that performance from 2004 to 2009?
and how much does this change represent in relation to that performance in 2004, in percentage?
what is, then, the difference between the percent representation of the united parcel service inc . and the s&p 500 index?

Answers:
-24.05
-24.05%
102.11
2.11
2.11%
-26.16%
( 1 ) includes shares repurchased through our publicly announced share repurchase program and shares tendered to pay the exercise price and tax withholding on employee stock options . shareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the securities and exchange commission , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates such information by reference into such filing . the following graph shows a five-year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the s&p 500 index , and the dow jones transportation average . the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2004 in the s&p 500 index , the dow jones transportation average , and our class b common stock . comparison of five year cumulative total return $ 40.00 $ 60.00 $ 80.00 $ 100.00 $ 120.00 $ 140.00 $ 160.00 2004 20092008200720062005 s&p 500 ups dj transport .

12/31/04: united parcel service inc .: 100
s&p 500 index: 100
dow jones transportation average: 100
12/31/05: united parcel service inc .: 89.49
s&p 500 index: 104.91
dow jones transportation average: 111.65
12/31/06: united parcel service inc .: 91.06
s&p 500 index: 121.48
dow jones transportation average: 122.61
12/31/07: united parcel service inc .: 87.88
s&p 500 index: 128.15
dow jones transportation average: 124.35
12/31/08: united parcel service inc .: 70.48
s&p 500 index: 80.74
dow jones transportation average: 97.72
12/31/09: united parcel service inc .: 75.95
s&p 500 index: 102.11
dow jones transportation average: 115.88

.

Questions:
what was the fluctuation of the performance price of the ups from 2004 to 2006?
and how much does this fluctuation represent in relation to that price in 2004?
and from this year to 2009, what was the fluctuation for that stock?
what is this fluctuation as a percentage of the 2004 price?
and for the s&p 500 index price, what was the fluctuation in those five years?
and what percentage does this fluctuation represent in relation to the 2004 price of this stock?
what is, then, the difference between the ups percentage and this s&p 500 index one, for this five year period?

Answers:
-8.94
-8.9%
-24.05
-24.05%
2.11
2.11%
-26.16%
entergy mississippi , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis results of operations net income 2008 compared to 2007 net income decreased $ 12.4 million primarily due to higher other operation and maintenance expenses , lower other income , and higher depreciation and amortization expenses , partially offset by higher net revenue . 2007 compared to 2006 net income increased $ 19.8 million primarily due to higher net revenue , lower other operation and maintenance expenses , higher other income , and lower interest expense , partially offset by higher depreciation and amortization expenses . net revenue 2008 compared to 2007 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2008 to 2007 . amount ( in millions ) .

amount ( in millions ): 2007 net revenue: 486.9
attala costs: 9.9
rider revenue: 6
base revenue: 5.1
reserve equalization: -2.4
net wholesale revenue: -4
other: -2.7
2008 net revenue: 498.8

the attala costs variance is primarily due to an increase in the attala power plant costs that are recovered through the power management rider . the net income effect of this recovery in limited to a portion representing an allowed return on equity with the remainder offset by attala power plant costs in other operation and maintenance expenses , depreciation expenses , and taxes other than income taxes . the recovery of attala power plant costs is discussed further in "liquidity and capital resources - uses of capital" below . the rider revenue variance is the result of a storm damage rider that became effective in october 2007 . the establishment of this rider results in an increase in rider revenue and a corresponding increase in other operation and maintenance expense for the storm reserve with no effect on net income . the base revenue variance is primarily due to a formula rate plan increase effective july 2007 . the formula rate plan filing is discussed further in "state and local rate regulation" below . the reserve equalization variance is primarily due to changes in the entergy system generation mix compared to the same period in 2007. .

Questions:
what is the difference between the net revenue of 2008 and 2007?
how much does that difference represents in relation to the net revenue of 2007?

Answers:
11.9
2.4%
jpmorgan chase & co./2016 annual report 35 five-year stock performance the following table and graph compare the five-year cumulative total return for jpmorgan chase & co . ( 201cjpmorgan chase 201d or the 201cfirm 201d ) common stock with the cumulative return of the s&p 500 index , the kbw bank index and the s&p financial index . the s&p 500 index is a commonly referenced united states of america ( 201cu.s . 201d ) equity benchmark consisting of leading companies from different economic sectors . the kbw bank index seeks to reflect the performance of banks and thrifts that are publicly traded in the u.s . and is composed of leading national money center and regional banks and thrifts . the s&p financial index is an index of financial companies , all of which are components of the s&p 500 . the firm is a component of all three industry indices . the following table and graph assume simultaneous investments of $ 100 on december 31 , 2011 , in jpmorgan chase common stock and in each of the above indices . the comparison assumes that all dividends are reinvested . december 31 , ( in dollars ) 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 .

2011: jpmorgan chase: 100
kbw bank index: 100
s&p financial index: 100
s&p 500 index: 100
2012: jpmorgan chase: 136.18
kbw bank index: 133.03
s&p financial index: 128.75
s&p 500 index: 115.99
2013: jpmorgan chase: 186.17
kbw bank index: 183.26
s&p financial index: 174.57
s&p 500 index: 153.55
2014: jpmorgan chase: 204.57
kbw bank index: 200.42
s&p financial index: 201.06
s&p 500 index: 174.55
2015: jpmorgan chase: 221.68
kbw bank index: 201.4
s&p financial index: 197.92
s&p 500 index: 176.95
2016: jpmorgan chase: 298.31
kbw bank index: 258.82
s&p financial index: 242.94
s&p 500 index: 198.1

december 31 , ( in dollars ) .

Questions:
what was the value of the kbw bank index in 2016?
and what was the change in value of the stock from 2011 to 2016?
how much does that change represent in relation to the original 2011 value?

Answers:
258.82
158.82
158.82%
value , which may be maturity , the company does not consider these investments to be other-than-temporarily impaired as of december 31 , 2005 and 2004 . gross realized gains and losses for 2005 were $ 15000 and $ 75000 , respectively . gross realized gains and losses for 2004 were $ 628000 and $ 205000 , respectively . gross realized gains for 2003 were $ 1249000 . there were no gross realized losses for 2003 . maturities stated are effective maturities . f . restricted cash at december 31 , 2005 and 2004 , the company held $ 41482000 and $ 49847000 , respectively , in restricted cash . at december 31 , 2005 and 2004 the balance was held in deposit with certain banks predominantly to collateralize conditional stand-by letters of credit in the names of the company's landlords pursuant to certain operating lease agreements . g . property and equipment property and equipment consist of the following at december 31 ( in thousands ) : depreciation expense for the years ended december 31 , 2005 , 2004 and 2003 was $ 26307000 , $ 28353000 and $ 27988000 respectively . in 2005 and 2004 , the company wrote off certain assets that were fully depreciated and no longer utilized . there was no effect on the company's net property and equipment . additionally , the company wrote off or sold certain assets that were not fully depreciated . the net loss on disposal of those assets was $ 344000 for 2005 and $ 43000 for 2004 . h . investments in accordance with the company's policy , as outlined in note b , "accounting policies" the company assessed its investment in altus pharmaceuticals , inc . ( "altus" ) , which it accounts for using the cost method , and determined that there had not been any adjustments to the fair values of that investment which would indicate a decrease in its fair value below the carrying value that would require the company to write down the investment basis of the asset , as of december 31 , 2005 and december 31 , 2004 . the company's cost basis carrying value in its outstanding equity and warrants of altus was $ 18863000 at december 31 , 2005 and 2004. .

2005: furniture and equipment: 98387
leasehold improvements: 66318
computers: 18971
software: 18683
total property and equipment gross: 202359
less accumulated depreciation and amortization: 147826
total property and equipment net: 54533
2004: furniture and equipment: 90893
leasehold improvements: 65294
computers: 18421
software: 16411
total property and equipment gross: 191019
less accumulated depreciation and amortization: 126794
total property and equipment net: 64225

.

Questions:
what was the net loss on disposal of assets in 2005?
what was the value in 2004?
what was the change in value?
what was the percent change?

Answers:
344000
43000
301000
700%
shareholder return performance presentation the graph presented below compares the cumulative total shareholder return on state street's common stock to the cumulative total return of the s&p 500 index , the s&p financial index and the kbw bank index over a five- year period . the cumulative total shareholder return assumes the investment of $ 100 in state street common stock and in each index on december 31 , 2008 at the closing price on the last trading day of 2008 , and also assumes reinvestment of common stock dividends . the s&p financial index is a publicly available measure of 81 of the standard & poor's 500 companies , representing 17 diversified financial services companies , 22 insurance companies , 19 real estate companies and 23 banking companies . the kbw bank index seeks to reflect the performance of banks and thrifts that are publicly traded in the u.s. , and is composed of 24 leading national money center and regional banks and thrifts. .

2008: state street corporation: 100
s&p 500 index: 100
s&p financial index: 100
kbw bank index: 100
2009: state street corporation: 111
s&p 500 index: 126
s&p financial index: 117
kbw bank index: 98
2010: state street corporation: 118
s&p 500 index: 146
s&p financial index: 132
kbw bank index: 121
2011: state street corporation: 105
s&p 500 index: 149
s&p financial index: 109
kbw bank index: 93
2012: state street corporation: 125
s&p 500 index: 172
s&p financial index: 141
kbw bank index: 122
2013: state street corporation: 198
s&p 500 index: 228
s&p financial index: 191
kbw bank index: 168

.

Questions:
what is the fraction change of the investment in s&p500 from 2008 to 2013?
what is the initial value in 2008?
what percentage change does this repreent?

Answers:
128
100
1.28
2mar201707015999 ( c ) in october 2016 , our accelerated share repurchase ( 2018 2018asr 2019 2019 ) agreement concluded and we received an additional 44 thousand shares of our common stock . shares purchased pursuant to the asr agreement are presented in the table above in the periods in which they were received . performance graph the following graph compares the performance of our common stock with that of the s&p 500 index and the s&p 500 healthcare equipment index . the cumulative total return listed below assumes an initial investment of $ 100 at the market close on december 30 , 2011 and reinvestment of dividends . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return 2011 2012 2016201520142013 edwards lifesciences corporation s&p 500 s&p 500 healthcare equipment index december 31 .

2012: edwards lifesciences: 127.54
s&p 500: 116
s&p 500 healthcare equipment index: 117.42
2013: edwards lifesciences: 93.01
s&p 500: 153.58
s&p 500 healthcare equipment index: 150.28
2014: edwards lifesciences: 180.17
s&p 500: 174.6
s&p 500 healthcare equipment index: 181.96
2015: edwards lifesciences: 223.42
s&p 500: 177.01
s&p 500 healthcare equipment index: 194.37
2016: edwards lifesciences: 265.06
s&p 500: 198.18
s&p 500 healthcare equipment index: 207.46

.

Questions:
what is the value of an investment in edwards lifesciences in 2016?
what is the net change from the initial investment?
what rate of cumulative return does this represent?
what about the value if the investment in s&p500 in 2016?
what is the net change from the initial investment?
what rate of cumulative return does this represent?
what is the difference in returns between s&p500 and edwards lifesciences for this period?

Answers:
265.06
165.06
165.06%
198.18
98.18
98%
67%
notes to consolidated financial statements at december 31 , 2007 , future minimum rental payments required under operating leases for continuing operations that have initial or remaining noncancelable lease terms in excess of one year , net of sublease rental income , most of which pertain to real estate leases , are as follows : ( millions ) .

$ 317: 2009: 275
2010: 236
2011: 214
2012: 191
later years: 597
total minimum payments required: 1830

aon corporation .

Questions:
what is the difference in value of future minimum rent payments from 2008 to 2009?
what is the value of future minimum rent payments in 2008?
what is the percent change?

Answers:
-42
317
-13.25%
item 5 . market for the registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities the following graph compares annual total return of our common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 composite stock index ( 201cs&p 500 index 201d ) and our peer group ( 201cloews peer group 201d ) for the five years ended december 31 , 2016 . the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock , the s&p 500 index and the loews peer group was $ 100 on december 31 , 2011 and that all dividends were reinvested. .

2011: loews common stock: 100
s&p 500 index: 100
loews peer group ( a ): 100
2012: loews common stock: 108.91
s&p 500 index: 116
loews peer group ( a ): 113.39
2013: loews common stock: 129.64
s&p 500 index: 153.57
loews peer group ( a ): 142.85
2014: loews common stock: 113.59
s&p 500 index: 174.6
loews peer group ( a ): 150.44
2015: loews common stock: 104.47
s&p 500 index: 177.01
loews peer group ( a ): 142.44
2016: loews common stock: 128.19
s&p 500 index: 198.18
loews peer group ( a ): 165.34

( a ) the loews peer group consists of the following companies that are industry competitors of our principal operating subsidiaries : chubb limited ( name change from ace limited after it acquired the chubb corporation on january 15 , 2016 ) , w.r . berkley corporation , the chubb corporation ( included through january 15 , 2016 when it was acquired by ace limited ) , energy transfer partners l.p. , ensco plc , the hartford financial services group , inc. , kinder morgan energy partners , l.p . ( included through november 26 , 2014 when it was acquired by kinder morgan inc. ) , noble corporation , spectra energy corp , transocean ltd . and the travelers companies , inc . dividend information we have paid quarterly cash dividends in each year since 1967 . regular dividends of $ 0.0625 per share of loews common stock were paid in each calendar quarter of 2016 and 2015. .

Questions:
what was the change in the value of the s&p index from 2011 to 2016?
what is the percent change?

Answers:
98.18
98.2%
management 2019s discussion and analysis net interest income 2013 versus 2012 . net interest income on the consolidated statements of earnings was $ 3.39 billion for 2013 , 13% ( 13 % ) lower than 2012 . the decrease compared with 2012 was primarily due to lower average yields on financial instruments owned , at fair value , partially offset by lower interest expense on financial instruments sold , but not yet purchased , at fair value and collateralized financings . 2012 versus 2011 . net interest income on the consolidated statements of earnings was $ 3.88 billion for 2012 , 25% ( 25 % ) lower than 2011 . the decrease compared with 2011 was primarily due to lower average yields on financial instruments owned , at fair value and collateralized agreements . see 201cstatistical disclosures 2014 distribution of assets , liabilities and shareholders 2019 equity 201d for further information about our sources of net interest income . operating expenses our operating expenses are primarily influenced by compensation , headcount and levels of business activity . compensation and benefits includes salaries , discretionary compensation , amortization of equity awards and other items such as benefits . discretionary compensation is significantly impacted by , among other factors , the level of net revenues , overall financial performance , prevailing labor markets , business mix , the structure of our share-based compensation programs and the external environment . the table below presents our operating expenses and total staff ( which includes employees , consultants and temporary staff ) . .

year ended december 2013: compensation and benefits: 12613
brokerage clearing exchange anddistribution fees: 2341
market development: 541
communications and technology: 776
depreciation and amortization: 1322
occupancy: 839
professional fees: 930
insurance reserves1: 176
other expenses: 2931
total non-compensation expenses: 9856
total operating expenses: 22469
total staff at period-end: 32900
year ended december 2012: compensation and benefits: 12944
brokerage clearing exchange anddistribution fees: 2208
market development: 509
communications and technology: 782
depreciation and amortization: 1738
occupancy: 875
professional fees: 867
insurance reserves1: 598
other expenses: 2435
total non-compensation expenses: 10012
total operating expenses: 22956
total staff at period-end: 32400
year ended december 2011: compensation and benefits: 12223
brokerage clearing exchange anddistribution fees: 2463
market development: 640
communications and technology: 828
depreciation and amortization: 1865
occupancy: 1030
professional fees: 992
insurance reserves1: 529
other expenses: 2072
total non-compensation expenses: 10419
total operating expenses: 22642
total staff at period-end: 33300

1 . related revenues are included in 201cmarket making 201d in the consolidated statements of earnings . goldman sachs 2013 annual report 45 .

Questions:
what was the difference in total staff between the year ended december 2013 and december 2012?
and the percentage change?

Answers:
500
1.5%