sharick008/convfinqa huggingface dataset:
issuer purchases of equity securities in january 2017 , our board of directors authorized the repurchase of shares of our common stock with a value of up to $ 525 million in the aggregate . as of december 29 , 2018 , $ 175 million remained available under this authorization . in february 2019 , our board of directors authorized the additional repurchase of shares of our common stock with a value of up to $ 500.0 million in the aggregate . the actual timing and amount of repurchases are subject to business and market conditions , corporate and regulatory requirements , stock price , acquisition opportunities and other factors . the following table presents repurchases made under our current authorization and shares surrendered by employees to satisfy income tax withholding obligations during the three months ended december 29 , 2018 : period total number of shares purchased ( 1 ) average price paid per share ( 2 ) total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plan or program maximum dollar value of shares authorized for repurchase under publicly announced plan or program ( 1 ) ( in millions ) september 30 , 2018 2013 november 3 , 2018 543900 $ 42.64 495543 $ 254 november 4 , 2018 2013 december 1 , 2018 650048 $ 44.49 623692 $ 226 december 2 , 2018 2013 december 29 , 2018 1327657 $ 42.61 1203690 $ 175 .

total numberof sharespurchased ( 1 ): september 30 2018 2013 november 3 2018: 543900
november 4 2018 2013 december 1 2018: 650048
december 2 2018 2013 december 29 2018: 1327657
total: 2521605
averageprice paidper share ( 2 ): september 30 2018 2013 november 3 2018: 42.64
november 4 2018 2013 december 1 2018: 44.49
december 2 2018 2013 december 29 2018: 42.61
total: 43.1
total number ofshares purchasedas part ofpublicly announcedplan or program: september 30 2018 2013 november 3 2018: 495543
november 4 2018 2013 december 1 2018: 623692
december 2 2018 2013 december 29 2018: 1203690
total: 2322925
maximum dollarvalue of sharesauthorized for repurchase underpublicly announcedplan or program ( 1 ) ( in millions ): september 30 2018 2013 november 3 2018: 254
november 4 2018 2013 december 1 2018: 226
december 2 2018 2013 december 29 2018: 175

( 1 ) shares purchased that were not part of our publicly announced repurchase programs represent employee surrender of shares of restricted stock to satisfy employee income tax withholding obligations due upon vesting , and do not reduce the dollar value that may yet be purchased under our publicly announced repurchase programs . ( 2 ) the weighted average price paid per share of common stock does not include the cost of commissions. .

Questions:
for the three month period ended december 29, 2018, what was the average number of shares purchased per month?
and only in december, what was the number of shares purchased?
what was the average price paid for each of those shares?
what was, then, the full value of those december shares?
and how much is that in millions?

Answers:
840535
1327657
42.61
56571465
56.6
entergy louisiana , llc management's financial discussion and analysis net revenue 2008 compared to 2007 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2008 to 2007 . amount ( in millions ) .

amount ( in millions ): 2007 net revenue: 991.1
retail electric price: -17.1
purchased power capacity: -12
net wholesale revenue: -7.4
other: 4.6
2008 net revenue: 959.2

the retail electric price variance is primarily due to the cessation of the interim storm recovery through the formula rate plan upon the act 55 financing of storm costs and a credit passed on to customers as a result of the act 55 storm cost financing , partially offset by increases in the formula rate plan effective october 2007 . refer to "hurricane rita and hurricane katrina" and "state and local rate regulation" below for a discussion of the interim recovery of storm costs , the act 55 storm cost financing , and the formula rate plan filing . the purchased power capacity variance is due to the amortization of deferred capacity costs effective september 2007 as a result of the formula rate plan filing in may 2007 . purchased power capacity costs are offset in base revenues due to a base rate increase implemented to recover incremental deferred and ongoing purchased power capacity charges . see "state and local rate regulation" below for a discussion of the formula rate plan filing . the net wholesale revenue variance is primarily due to provisions recorded for potential rate refunds related to the treatment of interruptible load in pricing entergy system affiliate sales . gross operating revenue and , fuel and purchased power expenses gross operating revenues increased primarily due to an increase of $ 364.7 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due to higher fuel rates offset by decreased usage . the increase was partially offset by a decrease of $ 56.8 million in gross wholesale revenue due to a decrease in system agreement rough production cost equalization credits . fuel and purchased power expenses increased primarily due to increases in the average market prices of natural gas and purchased power , partially offset by a decrease in the recovery from customers of deferred fuel costs. .

Questions:
what was the net revenue in 2008?
and in 2007?
what was the change in net revenue between the two years?
and the growth rate in net revenue in 2008?

Answers:
959.2
991.1
-31.9
-3.2%
declaration and payment of future quarterly dividends is at the discretion of our board and may be adjusted as business needs or market conditions change . in addition , under the terms of the merger agreement , we have agreed with aetna to coordinate the declaration and payment of dividends so that our stockholders do not fail to receive a quarterly dividend around the time of the closing of the merger . on october 29 , 2015 , the board declared a cash dividend of $ 0.29 per share that was paid on january 29 , 2016 to stockholders of record on december 30 , 2015 , for an aggregate amount of $ 43 million . stock total return performance the following graph compares our total return to stockholders with the returns of the standard & poor 2019s composite 500 index ( 201cs&p 500 201d ) and the dow jones us select health care providers index ( 201cpeer group 201d ) for the five years ended december 31 , 2015 . the graph assumes an investment of $ 100 in each of our common stock , the s&p 500 , and the peer group on december 31 , 2010 , and that dividends were reinvested when paid. .

12/31/2010: hum: 100
s&p 500: 100
peer group: 100
12/31/2011: hum: 162
s&p 500: 102
peer group: 110
12/31/2012: hum: 128
s&p 500: 118
peer group: 129
12/31/2013: hum: 195
s&p 500: 157
peer group: 177
12/31/2014: hum: 274
s&p 500: 178
peer group: 226
12/31/2015: hum: 343
s&p 500: 181
peer group: 239

the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance. .

Questions:
what was the change in the stock price performance for hum from 2011 to 2012?
and how much did this change represent, in percentage, in relation to that price performance in 2011?
and considering only the first year of the investment for all the stocks shown in the chart, what was the biggest price performance in 2011?
what was the change in that performance since 2010?

Answers:
-34
-21%
162
62%
performance graph comparison of five-year cumulative total return the following graph and table compare the cumulative total return on citi 2019s common stock , which is listed on the nyse under the ticker symbol 201cc 201d and held by 81805 common stockholders of record as of january 31 , 2016 , with the cumulative total return of the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index over the five-year period through december 31 , 2015 . the graph and table assume that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2010 in citi 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index , and that all dividends were reinvested . comparison of five-year cumulative total return for the years ended date citi s&p 500 financials .

citi: 31-dec-2010: 100
30-dec-2011: 55.67
31-dec-2012: 83.81
31-dec-2013: 110.49
31-dec-2014: 114.83
31-dec-2015: 110.14
s&p 500: 31-dec-2010: 100
30-dec-2011: 102.11
31-dec-2012: 118.45
31-dec-2013: 156.82
31-dec-2014: 178.28
31-dec-2015: 180.75
s&p financials: 31-dec-2010: 100
30-dec-2011: 82.94
31-dec-2012: 106.84
31-dec-2013: 144.9
31-dec-2014: 166.93
31-dec-2015: 164.39

.

Questions:
what was the change in the performance of the citi common stock from 2010 to 2015?
and how much does this change represent in relation to that performance in 2010, in percentage?

Answers:
10.14
10.14%
notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) the following table summarizes the changes in non-vested restricted stock awards for the year ended may 31 , 2009 ( share awards in thousands ) : share awards weighted average grant-date fair value .

share awards: non-vested at may 31 2007: 278
granted: 430
vested: -159
forfeited: -27
non-vested at may 31 2008: 518
non-vested at may 31 2009: 762
weighted average grant-date fair value: non-vested at may 31 2007: 37
granted: 43
vested: 39
forfeited: 41
non-vested at may 31 2008: 39
non-vested at may 31 2009: 42

the weighted average grant-date fair value of share awards granted in the years ended may 31 , 2008 and 2007 was $ 38 and $ 45 , respectively . the total fair value of share awards vested during the years ended may 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 was $ 6.2 million , $ 4.1 million and $ 1.7 million , respectively . we recognized compensation expense for restricted stock of $ 9.0 million , $ 5.7 million , and $ 2.7 million in the years ended may 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 . as of may 31 , 2009 , there was $ 23.5 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested restricted stock awards that is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.9 years . employee stock purchase plan we have an employee stock purchase plan under which the sale of 2.4 million shares of our common stock has been authorized . employees may designate up to the lesser of $ 25000 or 20% ( 20 % ) of their annual compensation for the purchase of stock . the price for shares purchased under the plan is 85% ( 85 % ) of the market value on the last day of the quarterly purchase period . as of may 31 , 2009 , 0.8 million shares had been issued under this plan , with 1.6 million shares reserved for future issuance . the weighted average grant-date fair value of each designated share purchased under this plan was $ 6 , $ 6 and $ 8 in the years ended may 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively . these values represent the fair value of the 15% ( 15 % ) discount . note 12 2014segment information general information during fiscal 2009 , we began assessing our operating performance using a new segment structure . we made this change as a result of our june 30 , 2008 acquisition of 51% ( 51 % ) of hsbc merchant services llp in the united kingdom , in addition to anticipated future international expansion . beginning with the quarter ended august 31 , 2008 , the reportable segments are defined as north america merchant services , international merchant services , and money transfer . the following tables reflect these changes and such reportable segments for fiscal years 2009 , 2008 , and 2007. .

Questions:
as of may 31, 2009, what was the total value of the non-vested shares, in thousands?
and what is that in millions?
and in the year before, what was that full value, also in thousands?
and what is that in millions?

Answers:
32004
32.0
20202
20.2
note 9 2014goodwill and other intangibles , net goodwill the following table outlines the activity in the carrying value of the company 2019s goodwill , which is all assigned to the company 2019s trading and investing segment ( dollars in thousands ) : .

trading & investing: balance at december 31 2011: 1934232
activity: 2014
balance at december 31 2012: 1934232
impairment of goodwill: -142423
balance at december 31 2013: 1791809

goodwill is evaluated for impairment on an annual basis and when events or changes indicate the carrying value of an asset exceeds its fair value and the loss may not be recoverable . at december 31 , 2013 and 2012 , the company 2019s trading and investing segment had two reporting units ; market making and retail brokerage . at the end of june 2013 , the company decided to exit its market making business . based on this decision in the second quarter of 2013 , the company conducted an interim goodwill impairment test for the market making reporting unit , using the expected sale structure of the market making business . this structure assumed a shorter period of cash flows related to an order flow arrangement , compared to prior estimates of fair value . based on the results of the first step of the goodwill impairment test , the company determined that the carrying value of the market making reporting unit , including goodwill , exceeded the fair value for that reporting unit as of june 30 , 2013 . the company proceeded to the second step of the goodwill impairment test to measure the amount of goodwill impairment . as a result of the evaluation , it was determined that the entire carrying amount of goodwill allocated to the market making reporting unit was impaired , and the company recognized a $ 142.4 million impairment of goodwill during the second quarter of 2013 . for the year ended december 31 , 2013 , the company performed its annual goodwill assessment for the retail brokerage reporting unit , electing to qualitatively assess whether it was more likely than not that the fair value was less than the carrying value . as a result of this assessment , the company determined that the first step of the goodwill impairment test was not necessary , and concluded that goodwill was not impaired at december 31 , 2013 . at december 31 , 2013 , goodwill is net of accumulated impairment losses of $ 142.4 million related to the trading and investing segment and $ 101.2 million in the balance sheet management segment . at december 31 , 2012 , goodwill is net of accumulated impairment losses of $ 101.2 million in the balance sheet management segment. .

Questions:
as of december 31, 2013, what percentage did the impairment of goodwill represent in relation to the total goodwill balance?
and what was this impairment amount as a percentage of that balance as of december 31 of the previous year?

Answers:
7.95%
-7%
federal realty investment trust schedule iii summary of real estate and accumulated depreciation 2014continued three years ended december 31 , 2007 reconciliation of accumulated depreciation and amortization ( in thousands ) .

$ 595338: additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense: 96454
deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property: -80258
balance december 31 2005: 663750
balance december 31 2006: 740507
balance december 31 2007: 756703

.

Questions:
what was the variation in the additions during 2005 and 2006?
and the increase in the deductions in 2006 and 2007?

Answers:
5908
67451
stock performance graph this performance graph shall not be deemed 201cfiled 201d for purposes of section 18 of the exchange act , or incorporated by reference into any filing of quintiles ims holdings , inc . under the exchange act or under the securities act , except as shall be expressly set forth by specific reference in such filing . the following graph shows a comparison from may 9 , 2013 ( the date our common stock commenced trading on the nyse ) through december 31 , 2016 of the cumulative total return for our common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index ( 201cs&p 500 201d ) and a select peer group . the peer group consists of cerner corporation , charles river laboratories , inc. , dun & bradstreet corporation , equifax inc. , icon plc , ihs markit ltd. , inc research holdings , laboratory corporation of america holdings , nielsen n.v. , parexel international corporation , inc. , pra health sciences , inc. , thomson reuters corporation and verisk analytics , inc . the companies in our peer group are publicly traded information services , information technology or contract research companies , and thus share similar business model characteristics to quintilesims , or provide services to similar customers as quintilesims . many of these companies are also used by our compensation committee for purposes of compensation benchmarking . the graph assumes that $ 100 was invested in quintilesims , the s&p 500 and the peer group as of the close of market on may 9 , 2013 , assumes the reinvestments of dividends , if any . the s&p 500 and our peer group are included for comparative purposes only . they do not necessarily reflect management 2019s opinion that the s&p 500 and our peer group are an appropriate measure of the relative performance of the stock involved , and they are not intended to forecast or be indicative of possible future performance of our common stock . s&p 500 quintilesims peer group .

5/9/2013: q: 100
peer group: 100
s&p 500: 100
12/31/2013: q: 110
peer group: 116
s&p 500: 114
12/31/2014: q: 140
peer group: 143
s&p 500: 127
12/31/2015: q: 163
peer group: 151
s&p 500: 126
12/31/2016: q: 181
peer group: 143
s&p 500: 138

item 6 . selected financial data we have derived the following consolidated statements of income data for 2016 , 2015 and 2014 and consolidated balance sheet data as of december 31 , 2016 and 2015 from our audited consolidated financial .

Questions:
what was the value of the peer group less 100?
what is the percent change?

Answers:
43
43%
schlumberger limited and subsidiaries shares of common stock issued in treasury shares outstanding ( stated in millions ) .

issued: balance january 1 2008: 1334
shares sold to optionees less shares exchanged: 2013
shares issued under employee stock purchase plan: 2013
stock repurchase program: 2013
issued on conversions of debentures: 2013
balance december 31 2008: 1334
vesting of restricted stock: 2013
balance december 31 2009: 1334
acquisition of smith international inc .: 100
balance december 31 2010: 1434
in treasury: balance january 1 2008: -138
shares sold to optionees less shares exchanged: 6
shares issued under employee stock purchase plan: 3
stock repurchase program: -27
issued on conversions of debentures: 8
balance december 31 2008: -140
vesting of restricted stock: 1
balance december 31 2009: -139
acquisition of smith international inc .: 76
balance december 31 2010: -73
shares outstanding: balance january 1 2008: 1196
shares sold to optionees less shares exchanged: 6
shares issued under employee stock purchase plan: 3
stock repurchase program: -27
issued on conversions of debentures: 8
balance december 31 2008: 1194
vesting of restricted stock: 1
balance december 31 2009: 1195
acquisition of smith international inc .: 176
balance december 31 2010: 1361

see the notes to consolidated financial statements part ii , item 8 .

Questions:
what is the sum of balances of outstanding shares for 2009 and 2010?
what is the average?
what about the sum of balances of outstanding shares for december 2008 and december 2009?
what about the average for these years?

Answers:
2556.0
1278
2389.0
1194.5
at december 31 , 2012 and 2011 , we had a working capital surplus . this reflects a strong cash position , which provides enhanced liquidity in an uncertain economic environment . in addition , we believe we have adequate access to capital markets to meet any foreseeable cash requirements , and we have sufficient financial capacity to satisfy our current liabilities . cash flows millions 2012 2011 2010 .

2012: cash provided by operating activities: 6161
cash used in investing activities: -3633
cash used in financing activities: -2682
net change in cash and cashequivalents: -154
2011: cash provided by operating activities: 5873
cash used in investing activities: -3119
cash used in financing activities: -2623
net change in cash and cashequivalents: 131
2010: cash provided by operating activities: 4105
cash used in investing activities: -2488
cash used in financing activities: -2381
net change in cash and cashequivalents: -764

operating activities higher net income in 2012 increased cash provided by operating activities compared to 2011 , partially offset by lower tax benefits from bonus depreciation ( as explained below ) and payments for past wages based on national labor negotiations settled earlier this year . higher net income and lower cash income tax payments in 2011 increased cash provided by operating activities compared to 2010 . the tax relief , unemployment insurance reauthorization , and job creation act of 2010 provided for 100% ( 100 % ) bonus depreciation for qualified investments made during 2011 , and 50% ( 50 % ) bonus depreciation for qualified investments made during 2012 . as a result of the act , the company deferred a substantial portion of its 2011 income tax expense . this deferral decreased 2011 income tax payments , thereby contributing to the positive operating cash flow . in future years , however , additional cash will be used to pay income taxes that were previously deferred . in addition , the adoption of a new accounting standard in january of 2010 changed the accounting treatment for our receivables securitization facility from a sale of undivided interests ( recorded as an operating activity ) to a secured borrowing ( recorded as a financing activity ) , which decreased cash provided by operating activities by $ 400 million in 2010 . investing activities higher capital investments in 2012 drove the increase in cash used in investing activities compared to 2011 . included in capital investments in 2012 was $ 75 million for the early buyout of 165 locomotives under long-term operating and capital leases during the first quarter of 2012 , which we exercised due to favorable economic terms and market conditions . higher capital investments partially offset by higher proceeds from asset sales in 2011 drove the increase in cash used in investing activities compared to 2010. .

Questions:
what is the value of the early buyout of locomotives, times 1000000?
what is that divided by the number of locomotives?

Answers:
75000000
454545