sharick008/convfinqa huggingface dataset:
performance graph the graph below compares the cumulative total shareholder return on pmi's common stock with the cumulative total return for the same period of pmi's peer group and the s&p 500 index . the graph assumes the investment of $ 100 as of december 31 , 2013 , in pmi common stock ( at prices quoted on the new york stock exchange ) and each of the indices as of the market close and reinvestment of dividends on a quarterly basis . date pmi pmi peer group ( 1 ) s&p 500 index .

pmi: december 31 2013: 100
december 31 2014: 97.9
december 31 2015: 111
december 31 2016: 120.5
december 31 2017: 144.5
december 31 2018: 96.5
pmi peer group ( 1 ): december 31 2013: 100
december 31 2014: 107.8
december 31 2015: 116.8
december 31 2016: 118.4
december 31 2017: 140.5
december 31 2018: 127.7
s&p 500 index: december 31 2013: 100
december 31 2014: 113.7
december 31 2015: 115.3
december 31 2016: 129
december 31 2017: 157.2
december 31 2018: 150.3

( 1 ) the pmi peer group presented in this graph is the same as that used in the prior year . the pmi peer group was established based on a review of four characteristics : global presence ; a focus on consumer products ; and net revenues and a market capitalization of a similar size to those of pmi . the review also considered the primary international tobacco companies . as a result of this review , the following companies constitute the pmi peer group : altria group , inc. , anheuser-busch inbev sa/nv , british american tobacco p.l.c. , the coca-cola company , colgate-palmolive co. , diageo plc , heineken n.v. , imperial brands plc , japan tobacco inc. , johnson & johnson , kimberly-clark corporation , the kraft-heinz company , mcdonald's corp. , mondel z international , inc. , nestl e9 s.a. , pepsico , inc. , the procter & gamble company , roche holding ag , and unilever nv and plc . note : figures are rounded to the nearest $ 0.10. .

Questions:
what was the value of pmi common stock in 2018?
what is that less 100?
what is that divided by 100?
what is the net change of the s&p 500 from 2013 to 2018?
what is that divided by 100?
what is the pmi quotient less the s&p quotient?

Answers:
96.50
-3.5
-3.5%
50.3
50.3%
53.8%
during 2015 , $ 82 million of provision recapture was recorded for purchased impaired loans compared to $ 91 million of provision recapture during 2014 . charge-offs ( which were specifically for commercial loans greater than a defined threshold ) during 2015 were $ 12 million compared to $ 42 million during 2014 . at december 31 , 2015 and december 31 , 2014 , the alll on total purchased impaired loans was $ .3 billion and $ .9 billion , respectively . the decline in alll was primarily due to the change in our derecognition policy . for purchased impaired loan pools where an allowance has been recognized , subsequent increases in the net present value of cash flows will result in a provision recapture of any previously recorded alll to the extent applicable , and/or a reclassification from non-accretable difference to accretable yield , which will be recognized prospectively . individual loan transactions where final dispositions have occurred ( as noted above ) result in removal of the loans from their applicable pools for cash flow estimation purposes . the cash flow re- estimation process is completed quarterly to evaluate the appropriateness of the alll associated with the purchased impaired loans . activity for the accretable yield during 2015 and 2014 follows : table 66 : purchased impaired loans 2013 accretable yield .

2015: january 1: 1558
accretion ( including excess cash recoveries ): -466
net reclassifications to accretable from non-accretable: 226
disposals: -68
december 31: 1250
2014: january 1: 2055
accretion ( including excess cash recoveries ): -587
net reclassifications to accretable from non-accretable: 208
disposals: -118
december 31: 1558

note 5 allowances for loan and lease losses and unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit allowance for loan and lease losses we maintain the alll at levels that we believe to be appropriate to absorb estimated probable credit losses incurred in the portfolios as of the balance sheet date . we use the two main portfolio segments 2013 commercial lending and consumer lending 2013 and develop and document the alll under separate methodologies for each of these segments as discussed in note 1 accounting policies . a rollforward of the alll and associated loan data follows . the pnc financial services group , inc . 2013 form 10-k 141 .

Questions:
what is the sum of the provision recapture for purchased impaired loans in 2014 and 2015?
what is that divided by 2?

Answers:
173.0
86.5
market price and dividends d u k e r e a l t y c o r p o r a t i o n 3 8 2 0 0 2 a n n u a l r e p o r t the company 2019s common shares are listed for trading on the new york stock exchange , symbol dre . the following table sets forth the high and low sales prices of the common stock for the periods indicated and the dividend paid per share during each such period . comparable cash dividends are expected in the future . on january 29 , 2003 , the company declared a quarterly cash dividend of $ .455 per share , payable on february 28 , 2003 , to common shareholders of record on february 14 , 2003. .

2002 high (1): december 31: 25.84
september 30: 28.88
june 30: 28.95
march 31: 26.5
2002 low (1): december 31: 21.5
september 30: 21.4
june 30: 25.46
march 31: 22.92
2002 dividend: december 31: 455
september 30: 455
june 30: 450
march 31: 450
2002 high (2): december 31: 24.8
september 30: 26.17
june 30: 24.99
march 31: 25.44
2002 low (2): december 31: 22
september 30: 21.6
june 30: 22
march 31: 21.85
dividend: december 31: 45
september 30: 45
june 30: 43
march 31: 43

.

Questions:
what is the net change in the cash dividend for the period ended march 31, 2002 to the period ended march 31, 2003?
what is that divided by the dividend payment in 2002?
what is that by 100?

Answers:
.005
.0111
1.11%
stock performance graph this performance graph shall not be deemed 201cfiled 201d for purposes of section 18 of the securities exchange act of 1934 , as amended ( the 201cexchange act 201d ) or otherwise subject to the liabilities under that section and shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing of tractor supply company under the securities act of 1933 , as amended , or the exchange act . the following graph compares the cumulative total stockholder return on our common stock from december 28 , 2013 to december 29 , 2018 ( the company 2019s fiscal year-end ) , with the cumulative total returns of the s&p 500 index and the s&p retail index over the same period . the comparison assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 28 , 2013 , in our common stock and in each of the foregoing indices and in each case assumes reinvestment of dividends . the historical stock price performance shown on this graph is not indicative of future performance. .

12/28/2013: tractor supply company: 100
s&p 500: 100
s&p retail index: 100
12/27/2014: tractor supply company: 104.11
s&p 500: 115.76
s&p retail index: 111.18
12/26/2015: tractor supply company: 115.45
s&p 500: 116.64
s&p retail index: 140.22
12/31/2016: tractor supply company: 103.33
s&p 500: 129.55
s&p retail index: 148.53
12/30/2017: tractor supply company: 103.67
s&p 500: 157.84
s&p retail index: 193.68
12/29/2018: tractor supply company: 117.18
s&p 500: 149.63
s&p retail index: 217.01

.

Questions:
what was the price of the tractor supply company stock in 2014?
and what was it in 2013?
what was, then, the change over the year?
what was the price of the tractor supply company stock in 2013?
and how much does that change represent in relation to this 2013 price, in percentage?

Answers:
104.11
100.00
4.11
100.00
4.11%
entergy louisiana , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis gross operating revenues , fuel and purchased power expenses , and other regulatory credits gross operating revenues increased primarily due to : 2022 an increase of $ 98.0 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due to higher fuel rates ; and 2022 an increase due to volume/weather , as discussed above . the increase was partially offset by the following : 2022 a decrease of $ 31.9 million in the price applied to unbilled sales , as discussed above ; 2022 a decrease of $ 12.2 million in rate refund provisions , as discussed above ; and 2022 a decrease of $ 5.2 million in gross wholesale revenue due to decreased sales to affiliated systems . fuel and purchased power expenses increased primarily due to : 2022 an increase in the recovery from customers of deferred fuel costs ; and 2022 an increase in the market price of natural gas . other regulatory credits increased primarily due to : 2022 the deferral in 2004 of $ 14.3 million of capacity charges related to generation resource planning as allowed by the lpsc ; 2022 the amortization in 2003 of $ 11.8 million of deferred capacity charges , as discussed above ; and 2022 the deferral in 2004 of $ 11.4 million related to entergy's voluntary severance program , in accordance with a proposed stipulation with the lpsc staff . 2003 compared to 2002 net revenue , which is entergy louisiana's measure of gross margin , consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related , and purchased power expenses and 2 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2003 to 2002. .

( in millions ): 2002 net revenue: 922.9
deferred fuel cost revisions: 59.1
asset retirement obligation: 8.2
volume: -16.2
vidalia settlement: -9.2
other: 8.9
2003 net revenue: 973.7

the deferred fuel cost revisions variance resulted from a revised unbilled sales pricing estimate made in december 2002 and a further revision made in the first quarter of 2003 to more closely align the fuel component of that pricing with expected recoverable fuel costs . the asset retirement obligation variance was due to the implementation of sfas 143 , "accounting for asset retirement obligations" adopted in january 2003 . see "critical accounting estimates" for more details on sfas 143 . the increase was offset by decommissioning expense and had no effect on net income . the volume variance was due to a decrease in electricity usage in the service territory . billed usage decreased 1868 gwh in the industrial sector including the loss of a large industrial customer to cogeneration. .

Questions:
what was the total increase in the other regulatory credits in 2003?
and what percentage did this increase represent in relation to the net revenue in that year?
and concerning the increase in fuel cost recovery revenues in that same period, what percent of it was due to deferred fuel cost revisions?

Answers:
37.5
3.85%
60.3%
entergy new orleans , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis net revenue 2008 compared to 2007 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2008 to 2007 . amount ( in millions ) .

amount ( in millions ): 2007 net revenue: 231
volume/weather: 15.5
net gas revenue: 6.6
rider revenue: 3.9
base revenue: -11.3
other: 7
2008 net revenue: 252.7

the volume/weather variance is due to an increase in electricity usage in the service territory in 2008 compared to the same period in 2007 . entergy new orleans estimates that approximately 141000 electric customers and 93000 gas customers have returned since hurricane katrina and are taking service as of december 31 , 2008 , compared to approximately 132000 electric customers and 86000 gas customers as of december 31 , 2007 . billed retail electricity usage increased a total of 184 gwh compared to the same period in 2007 , an increase of 4% ( 4 % ) . the net gas revenue variance is primarily due to an increase in base rates in march and november 2007 . refer to note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the base rate increase . the rider revenue variance is due primarily to higher total revenue and a storm reserve rider effective march 2007 as a result of the city council's approval of a settlement agreement in october 2006 . the approved storm reserve has been set to collect $ 75 million over a ten-year period through the rider and the funds will be held in a restricted escrow account . the settlement agreement is discussed in note 2 to the financial statements . the base revenue variance is primarily due to a base rate recovery credit , effective january 2008 . the base rate credit is discussed in note 2 to the financial statements . gross operating revenues and fuel and purchased power expenses gross operating revenues increased primarily due to : an increase of $ 58.9 million in gross wholesale revenue due to increased sales to affiliated customers and an increase in the average price of energy available for resale sales ; an increase of $ 47.7 million in electric fuel cost recovery revenues due to higher fuel rates and increased electricity usage ; and an increase of $ 22 million in gross gas revenues due to higher fuel recovery revenues and increases in gas base rates in march 2007 and november 2007 . fuel and purchased power increased primarily due to increases in the average market prices of natural gas and purchased power in addition to an increase in demand. .

Questions:
what was the net change in revenue from 2007 to 2008?
what is the 2008 rider revenue divided by that net change?

Answers:
21.7
18%
item 1b . unresolved staff comments not applicable . item 2 . properties as of december 28 , 2013 , our major facilities consisted of : ( square feet in millions ) united states countries total owned facilities1 29.9 16.7 46.6 leased facilities2 2.3 6.0 8.3 .

unitedstates: owned facilities1: 29.9
leased facilities2: 2.3
total facilities: 32.2
othercountries: owned facilities1: 16.7
leased facilities2: 6
total facilities: 22.7
total: owned facilities1: 46.6
leased facilities2: 8.3
total facilities: 54.9

1 leases on portions of the land used for these facilities expire on varying dates through 2062 . 2 leases expire on varying dates through 2028 and generally include renewals at our option . our principal executive offices are located in the u.s . and a significant amount of our wafer fabrication activities are also located in the u.s . in addition to our current facilities , we are building a development fabrication facility in oregon which began r&d start-up in 2013 . we expect that this new facility will allow us to widen our process technology lead . we also completed construction of a large-scale fabrication building in arizona in 2013 , which is currently not in use and is not being depreciated . we recently announced that we plan to delay equipment installation in this building and leverage existing fabrication facilities , reserving this new facility for additional capacity and future technologies . outside the u.s. , we have wafer fabrication facilities in israel , china , and ireland . our fabrication facility in ireland is currently transitioning to a newer process technology node , with manufacturing expected to recommence in 2015 . our assembly and test facilities are located in malaysia , china , costa rica , and vietnam . in addition , we have sales and marketing offices worldwide that are generally located near major concentrations of customers . we believe that the facilities described above are suitable and adequate for our present purposes and that the productive capacity in our facilities is substantially being utilized or we have plans to utilize it . we do not identify or allocate assets by operating segment . for information on net property , plant and equipment by country , see 201cnote 27 : operating segments and geographic information 201d in part ii , item 8 of this form 10-k . item 3 . legal proceedings for a discussion of legal proceedings , see 201cnote 26 : contingencies 201d in part ii , item 8 of this form 10-k . item 4 . mine safety disclosures not applicable . table of contents .

Questions:
as of december 28, 2013, what percentage of the square footage of major facilities was owned?
and what percentage was leased?

Answers:
85%
15%
five-year stock performance graph the graph below illustrates the cumulative total shareholder return on snap-on common stock since december 31 , 2007 , assuming that dividends were reinvested . the graph compares snap-on 2019s performance to that of the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index ( 201cs&p 500 201d ) and a peer group . snap-on incorporated total shareholder return ( 1 ) fiscal year ended ( 2 ) snap-on incorporated peer group ( 3 ) s&p 500 .

snap-onincorporated: december 31 2007: 100
december 31 2008: 83.66
december 31 2009: 93.2
december 31 2010: 128.21
december 31 2011: 117.47
december 31 2012: 187.26
peer group ( 3 ): december 31 2007: 100
december 31 2008: 66.15
december 31 2009: 84.12
december 31 2010: 112.02
december 31 2011: 109.7
december 31 2012: 129
s&p 500: december 31 2007: 100
december 31 2008: 63
december 31 2009: 79.67
december 31 2010: 91.67
december 31 2011: 93.61
december 31 2012: 108.59

( 1 ) assumes $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2007 , and that dividends were reinvested quarterly . ( 2 ) the company's fiscal year ends on the saturday that is on or nearest to december 31 of each year ; for ease of calculation , the fiscal year end is assumed to be december 31 . ( 3 ) the peer group consists of : stanley black & decker , inc. , danaher corporation , emerson electric co. , genuine parts company , newell rubbermaid inc. , pentair ltd. , spx corporation and w.w . grainger , inc . cooper industries plc , a former member of the peer group , was removed , as it was acquired by a larger , non-comparable company in 2012 . 2012 annual report 23 snap-on incorporated peer group s&p 500 2007 2008 201120102009 2012 .

Questions:
what was the performance price of the s&p 500 in 2012?
and what was the change in that performance price from 2007 to 2012?
how much, then, does this change represent in relation to the performance price of that stock in 2007?

Answers:
108.59
8.59
8.59%
part ii item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities the following table presents reported quarterly high and low per share sale prices of our common stock on the new york stock exchange ( 201cnyse 201d ) for the years 2008 and 2007. .

high: quarter ended march 31: 41.31
quarter ended june 30: 43.84
quarter ended september 30: 45.45
quarter ended december 31: 46.53
2007: high
low: quarter ended march 31: 36.63
quarter ended june 30: 37.64
quarter ended september 30: 36.34
quarter ended december 31: 40.08
2007: low

on february 13 , 2009 , the closing price of our common stock was $ 28.85 per share as reported on the nyse . as of february 13 , 2009 , we had 397097677 outstanding shares of common stock and 499 registered holders . dividends we have never paid a dividend on our common stock . we anticipate that we may retain future earnings , if any , to fund the development and growth of our business . the indentures governing our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) senior notes due 2012 ( 201c7.50% ( 201c7.50 % ) notes 201d ) and our 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) senior notes due 2012 ( 201c7.125% ( 201c7.125 % ) notes 201d ) may prohibit us from paying dividends to our stockholders unless we satisfy certain financial covenants . the loan agreement for our revolving credit facility and term loan , and the indentures governing the terms of our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) notes and 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) notes contain covenants that restrict our ability to pay dividends unless certain financial covenants are satisfied . in addition , while spectrasite and its subsidiaries are classified as unrestricted subsidiaries under the indentures for our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) notes and 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) notes , certain of spectrasite 2019s subsidiaries are subject to restrictions on the amount of cash that they can distribute to us under the loan agreement related to our securitization transaction . for more information about the restrictions under the loan agreement for the revolving credit facility and term loan , our notes indentures and the loan agreement related to our securitization transaction , see item 7 of this annual report under the caption 201cmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2014liquidity and capital resources 2014factors affecting sources of liquidity 201d and note 6 to our consolidated financial statements included in this annual report. .

Questions:
what was the price of shares in february of 2009?
and what was it in by the end of 2008?
what was, then, the change over that period?
what was the price of shares in the end of 2008?
and how much does that change represent in relation to this 2008 price?

Answers:
37.28
28.85
8.43
28.85
29.2%
note 8 2014 benefit plans the company has defined benefit pension plans covering certain employees in the united states and certain international locations . postretirement healthcare and life insurance benefits provided to qualifying domestic retirees as well as other postretirement benefit plans in international countries are not material . the measurement date used for the company 2019s employee benefit plans is september 30 . effective january 1 , 2018 , the legacy u.s . pension plan was frozen to limit the participation of employees who are hired or re-hired by the company , or who transfer employment to the company , on or after january 1 , net pension cost for the years ended september 30 included the following components: .

pension plans 2018: service cost: 136
interest cost: 90
expected return on plan assets: -154
amortization of prior service credit: -13
amortization of loss: 78
settlements: 2
net pension cost: 137
net pension cost included in the preceding table that is attributable to international plans: 34
pension plans 2017: service cost: 110
interest cost: 61
expected return on plan assets: -112
amortization of prior service credit: -14
amortization of loss: 92
settlements: 2014
net pension cost: 138
net pension cost included in the preceding table that is attributable to international plans: 43
pension plans 2016: service cost: 81
interest cost: 72
expected return on plan assets: -109
amortization of prior service credit: -15
amortization of loss: 77
settlements: 7
net pension cost: 113
net pension cost included in the preceding table that is attributable to international plans: 35

net pension cost included in the preceding table that is attributable to international plans $ 34 $ 43 $ 35 the amounts provided above for amortization of prior service credit and amortization of loss represent the reclassifications of prior service credits and net actuarial losses that were recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) in prior periods . the settlement losses recorded in 2018 and 2016 primarily included lump sum benefit payments associated with the company 2019s u.s . supplemental pension plan . the company recognizes pension settlements when payments from the supplemental plan exceed the sum of service and interest cost components of net periodic pension cost associated with this plan for the fiscal year. .

Questions:
what was the pension service cost in 2018, in millions?
and what was it in 2017, also in millions?
what was, then, in millions, the total pension service cost in the two years?
including the year of 2015, what then becomes this total?
and what was the average pension service cost between those three years, in millions?

Answers:
136
110
246
327
109