entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis imprudence by the utility operating companies in their execution of their obligations under the system agreement . see note 2 to the financial statements for discussions of this litigation . in november 2012 the utility operating companies filed amendments to the system agreement with the ferc pursuant to section 205 of the federal power act . the amendments consist primarily of the technical revisions needed to the system agreement to ( i ) allocate certain charges and credits from the miso settlement statements to the participating utility operating companies ; and ( ii ) address entergy arkansas 2019s withdrawal from the system agreement . the lpsc , mpsc , puct , and city council filed protests at the ferc regarding the amendments and other aspects of the utility operating companies 2019 future operating arrangements , including requests that the continued viability of the system agreement in miso ( among other issues ) be set for hearing by the ferc . in december 2013 the ferc issued an order accepting the revisions filed in november 2012 , subject to a further compliance filing and other conditions . entergy services made the requisite compliance filing in february 2014 and the ferc accepted the compliance filing in november 2015 . in the november 2015 order , the ferc required entergy services to file a refund report consisting of the results of the intra-system bill rerun from december 19 , 2013 through november 30 , 2015 calculating the use of an energy-based allocator to allocate losses , ancillary services charges and credits , and uplift charges and credits to load of each participating utility operating company . the filing shows the following payments and receipts among the utility operating companies : payments ( receipts ) ( in millions ) .

payments ( receipts ) ( in millions ): entergy louisiana: -6.3
entergy mississippi: 4
entergy new orleans: 0.4
entergy texas: 1.9

in the december 2013 order , the ferc set one issue for hearing involving a settlement with union pacific regarding certain coal delivery issues . consistent with the decisions described above , entergy arkansas 2019s participation in the system agreement terminated effective december 18 , 2013 . in december 2014 a ferc alj issued an initial decision finding that entergy arkansas would realize benefits after december 18 , 2013 from the 2008 settlement agreement between entergy services , entergy arkansas , and union pacific , related to certain coal delivery issues . the alj further found that all of the utility operating companies should share in those benefits pursuant to the methodology proposed by the mpsc . the utility operating companies and other parties to the proceeding have filed briefs on exceptions and/or briefs opposing exceptions with the ferc challenging various aspects of the december 2014 initial decision and the matter is pending before the ferc . utility operating company notices of termination of system agreement participation consistent with their written notices of termination delivered in december 2005 and november 2007 , respectively , entergy arkansas and entergy mississippi filed with the ferc in february 2009 their notices of cancellation to terminate their participation in the system agreement , effective december 18 , 2013 and november 7 , 2015 , respectively . in november 2009 the ferc accepted the notices of cancellation and determined that entergy arkansas and entergy mississippi are permitted to withdraw from the system agreement following the 96-month notice period without payment of a fee or the requirement to otherwise compensate the remaining utility operating companies as a result of withdrawal . appeals by the lpsc and the city council were denied in 2012 and 2013 . effective december 18 , 2013 , entergy arkansas ceased participating in the system agreement . effective november 7 , 2015 , entergy mississippi ceased participating in the system agreement . in keeping with their prior commitments and after a careful evaluation of the basis for and continued reasonableness of the 96-month system agreement termination notice period , the utility operating companies filed with the ferc in october 2013 to amend the system agreement changing the notice period for an operating company to .

Questions:
what was the total of payments for entergy new orleans?
and what was that for entergy texas?
how much, then, did the new orleans amount represent in relation to the texas one?
and how much did this same texas amount represent in relation to the payments for entergy mississippi?

Answers:
0.4
1.9
21.1%
47.5%