sharick008/convfinqa huggingface dataset:
table of contents the following performance graph is not 201csoliciting material , 201d is not deemed filed with the sec , and is not to be incorporated by reference into any of valero 2019s filings under the securities act of 1933 or the securities exchange act of 1934 , as amended , respectively . this performance graph and the related textual information are based on historical data and are not indicative of future performance . the following line graph compares the cumulative total return 1 on an investment in our common stock against the cumulative total return of the s&p 500 composite index and an index of peer companies ( that we selected ) for the five-year period commencing december 31 , 2007 and ending december 31 , 2012 . our peer group consists of the following ten companies : alon usa energy , inc. ; bp plc ( bp ) ; cvr energy , inc. ; hess corporation ; hollyfrontier corporation ; marathon petroleum corporation ; phillips 66 ( psx ) ; royal dutch shell plc ( rds ) ; tesoro corporation ; and western refining , inc . our peer group previously included chevron corporation ( cvx ) and exxon mobil corporation ( xom ) but they were replaced with bp , psx , and rds . in 2012 , psx became an independent downstream energy company and was added to our peer group . cvx and xom were replaced with bp and rds as they were viewed as having operations that more closely aligned with our core businesses . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return1 among valero energy corporation , the s&p 500 index , old peer group , and new peer group .

12/2007: valero common stock: 100
s&p 500: 100
old peer group: 100
new peer group: 100
12/2008: valero common stock: 31.45
s&p 500: 63
old peer group: 80.98
new peer group: 66.27
12/2009: valero common stock: 25.09
s&p 500: 79.67
old peer group: 76.54
new peer group: 86.87
12/2010: valero common stock: 35.01
s&p 500: 91.67
old peer group: 88.41
new peer group: 72.84
12/2011: valero common stock: 32.26
s&p 500: 93.61
old peer group: 104.33
new peer group: 74.7
12/2012: valero common stock: 53.61
s&p 500: 108.59
old peer group: 111.11
new peer group: 76.89

____________ 1 assumes that an investment in valero common stock and each index was $ 100 on december 31 , 2007 . 201ccumulative total return 201d is based on share price appreciation plus reinvestment of dividends from december 31 , 2007 through december 31 , 2012. .

Questions:
what was the net change in the value of s&p common stock from 2007 to 2012?
what is that number divided by the value in 2007?

Answers:
8.59
8.59%
entergy new orleans , inc . management 2019s financial discussion and analysis plan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business see the 201cplan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business 201d section of entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis for a discussion of this matter , including the planned retirement of debt and preferred securities . results of operations net income 2011 compared to 2010 net income increased $ 4.9 million primarily due to lower other operation and maintenance expenses , lower taxes other than income taxes , a lower effective income tax rate , and lower interest expense , partially offset by lower net revenue . 2010 compared to 2009 net income remained relatively unchanged , increasing $ 0.6 million , primarily due to higher net revenue and lower interest expense , almost entirely offset by higher other operation and maintenance expenses , higher taxes other than income taxes , lower other income , and higher depreciation and amortization expenses . net revenue 2011 compared to 2010 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2011 to 2010 . amount ( in millions ) .

amount ( in millions ): 2010 net revenue: 272.9
retail electric price: -16.9
net gas revenue: -9.1
gas cost recovery asset: -3
volume/weather: 5.4
other: -2.3
2011 net revenue: 247

the retail electric price variance is primarily due to formula rate plan decreases effective october 2010 and october 2011 . see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the formula rate plan filing . the net gas revenue variance is primarily due to milder weather in 2011 compared to 2010 . the gas cost recovery asset variance is primarily due to the recognition in 2010 of a $ 3 million gas operations regulatory asset associated with the settlement of entergy new orleans 2019s electric and gas formula rate plan case and the amortization of that asset . see note 2 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the formula rate plan settlement. .

Questions:
what is the 2010 net revenue?
what is the 2011 net revenue?
what is the total net revenue of the years 2010 and 2011?
what is the sum between that total and the number 2?
what is the average of these 2 years?

Answers:
272.9
247.0
519.9
519.9
259.95
entergy corporation and subsidiaries notes to financial statements computed on a rolling 12 month basis . as of december 31 , 2008 , entergy louisiana was in compliance with these provisions . as of december 31 , 2008 , entergy louisiana had future minimum lease payments ( reflecting an overall implicit rate of 7.45% ( 7.45 % ) ) in connection with the waterford 3 sale and leaseback transactions , which are recorded as long-term debt , as follows : amount ( in thousands ) .

amount ( in thousands ): 2009: 32452
2010: 35138
2011: 50421
2012: 39067
2013: 26301
years thereafter: 137858
total: 321237
less : amount representing interest: 73512
present value of net minimum lease payments: 247725

grand gulf lease obligations in december 1988 , in two separate but substantially identical transactions , system energy sold and leased back undivided ownership interests in grand gulf for the aggregate sum of $ 500 million . the interests represent approximately 11.5% ( 11.5 % ) of grand gulf . the leases expire in 2015 . under certain circumstances , system entergy may repurchase the leased interests prior to the end of the term of the leases . at the end of the lease terms , system energy has the option to repurchase the leased interests in grand gulf at fair market value or to renew the leases for either fair market value or , under certain conditions , a fixed rate . in may 2004 , system energy caused the grand gulf lessors to refinance the outstanding bonds that they had issued to finance the purchase of their undivided interest in grand gulf . the refinancing is at a lower interest rate , and system energy's lease payments have been reduced to reflect the lower interest costs . system energy is required to report the sale-leaseback as a financing transaction in its financial statements . for financial reporting purposes , system energy expenses the interest portion of the lease obligation and the plant depreciation . however , operating revenues include the recovery of the lease payments because the transactions are accounted for as a sale and leaseback for ratemaking purposes . consistent with a recommendation contained in a ferc audit report , system energy initially recorded as a net regulatory asset the difference between the recovery of the lease payments and the amounts expensed for interest and depreciation and continues to record this difference as a regulatory asset or liability on an ongoing basis , resulting in a zero net balance for the regulatory asset at the end of the lease term . the amount of this net regulatory asset was $ 19.2 million and $ 36.6 million as of december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively. .

Questions:
as of december 31, 2008, what was the full amount representing interest?
and what was the total of future minimum lease payments?
what was, then, that amount as a portion of this total?
and between that year and the previous, what was the variation in the net regulatory asset?
and how much did this variation represent in relation to that net regulatory asset in 2007?

Answers:
73512
321237
22.9%
-17.4
-47.5%
entergy corporation and subsidiaries notes to financial statements computed on a rolling 12 month basis . as of december 31 , 2008 , entergy louisiana was in compliance with these provisions . as of december 31 , 2008 , entergy louisiana had future minimum lease payments ( reflecting an overall implicit rate of 7.45% ( 7.45 % ) ) in connection with the waterford 3 sale and leaseback transactions , which are recorded as long-term debt , as follows : amount ( in thousands ) .

amount ( in thousands ): 2009: 32452
2010: 35138
2011: 50421
2012: 39067
2013: 26301
years thereafter: 137858
total: 321237
less : amount representing interest: 73512
present value of net minimum lease payments: 247725

grand gulf lease obligations in december 1988 , in two separate but substantially identical transactions , system energy sold and leased back undivided ownership interests in grand gulf for the aggregate sum of $ 500 million . the interests represent approximately 11.5% ( 11.5 % ) of grand gulf . the leases expire in 2015 . under certain circumstances , system entergy may repurchase the leased interests prior to the end of the term of the leases . at the end of the lease terms , system energy has the option to repurchase the leased interests in grand gulf at fair market value or to renew the leases for either fair market value or , under certain conditions , a fixed rate . in may 2004 , system energy caused the grand gulf lessors to refinance the outstanding bonds that they had issued to finance the purchase of their undivided interest in grand gulf . the refinancing is at a lower interest rate , and system energy's lease payments have been reduced to reflect the lower interest costs . system energy is required to report the sale-leaseback as a financing transaction in its financial statements . for financial reporting purposes , system energy expenses the interest portion of the lease obligation and the plant depreciation . however , operating revenues include the recovery of the lease payments because the transactions are accounted for as a sale and leaseback for ratemaking purposes . consistent with a recommendation contained in a ferc audit report , system energy initially recorded as a net regulatory asset the difference between the recovery of the lease payments and the amounts expensed for interest and depreciation and continues to record this difference as a regulatory asset or liability on an ongoing basis , resulting in a zero net balance for the regulatory asset at the end of the lease term . the amount of this net regulatory asset was $ 19.2 million and $ 36.6 million as of december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively. .

Questions:
what was the amount of the net regulatory asset in 2008, in millions?
and what was it in 2007, also in millions?
what was, then, the change in amount over the year, in millions?
how much does that change represent in relation to the total amount of net regulatory asset in 2007?

Answers:
19.2
36.6
-17.4
-47.5%
6feb201418202649 performance graph the table below compares the cumulative total shareholder return on our common stock with the cumulative total return of ( i ) the standard & poor 2019s 500 composite stock index ( 2018 2018s&p 500 index 2019 2019 ) , ( ii ) the standard & poor 2019s industrials index ( 2018 2018s&p industrials index 2019 2019 ) and ( iii ) the standard & poor 2019s consumer durables & apparel index ( 2018 2018s&p consumer durables & apparel index 2019 2019 ) , from december 31 , 2008 through december 31 , 2013 , when the closing price of our common stock was $ 22.77 . the graph assumes investments of $ 100 on december 31 , 2008 in our common stock and in each of the three indices and the reinvestment of dividends . $ 350.00 $ 300.00 $ 250.00 $ 200.00 $ 150.00 $ 100.00 $ 50.00 performance graph .

2009: masco: 128.21
s&p 500 index: 125.92
s&p industrials index: 120.19
s&p consumer durables & apparel index: 136.29
2010: masco: 120.32
s&p 500 index: 144.58
s&p industrials index: 151.89
s&p consumer durables & apparel index: 177.91
2011: masco: 102.45
s&p 500 index: 147.6
s&p industrials index: 150.97
s&p consumer durables & apparel index: 191.64
2012: masco: 165.8
s&p 500 index: 171.04
s&p industrials index: 173.87
s&p consumer durables & apparel index: 232.84
2013: masco: 229.59
s&p 500 index: 225.85
s&p industrials index: 243.73
s&p consumer durables & apparel index: 316.28

in july 2007 , our board of directors authorized the purchase of up to 50 million shares of our common stock in open-market transactions or otherwise . at december 31 , 2013 , we had remaining authorization to repurchase up to 22.6 million shares . during the first quarter of 2013 , we repurchased and retired 1.7 million shares of our common stock , for cash aggregating $ 35 million to offset the dilutive impact of the 2013 grant of 1.7 million shares of long-term stock awards . we have not purchased any shares since march 2013. .

Questions:
what was the performance value of the masco common stock in 2013?
and what was it in 2009?
what was, then, the change over the year?
what was the performance value of the masco common stock in 2009?
and how much does that change represent in relation to this 2009 performance value, in percentage?

Answers:
229.59
100
129.59
100
129.59%
jpmorgan chase & co./2018 form 10-k 41 five-year stock performance the following table and graph compare the five-year cumulative total return for jpmorgan chase & co . ( 201cjpmorgan chase 201d or the 201cfirm 201d ) common stock with the cumulative return of the s&p 500 index , the kbw bank index and the s&p financial index . the s&p 500 index is a commonly referenced equity benchmark in the united states of america ( 201cu.s . 201d ) , consisting of leading companies from different economic sectors . the kbw bank index seeks to reflect the performance of banks and thrifts that are publicly traded in the u.s . and is composed of leading national money center and regional banks and thrifts . the s&p financial index is an index of financial companies , all of which are components of the s&p 500 . the firm is a component of all three industry indices . the following table and graph assume simultaneous investments of $ 100 on december 31 , 2013 , in jpmorgan chase common stock and in each of the above indices . the comparison assumes that all dividends are reinvested . december 31 , ( in dollars ) 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 .

2013: jpmorgan chase: 100
kbw bank index: 100
s&p financial index: 100
s&p 500 index: 100
2014: jpmorgan chase: 109.88
kbw bank index: 109.36
s&p financial index: 115.18
s&p 500 index: 113.68
2015: jpmorgan chase: 119.07
kbw bank index: 109.9
s&p financial index: 113.38
s&p 500 index: 115.24
2016: jpmorgan chase: 160.23
kbw bank index: 141.23
s&p financial index: 139.17
s&p 500 index: 129.02
2017: jpmorgan chase: 203.07
kbw bank index: 167.49
s&p financial index: 169.98
s&p 500 index: 157.17
2018: jpmorgan chase: 189.57
kbw bank index: 137.82
s&p financial index: 147.82
s&p 500 index: 150.27

december 31 , ( in dollars ) .

Questions:
what was the proportion of the price of jpmorgan chase in 2018 to 2017?
and subtracted from 1?
and the proportion of the s&p 500 index price in 2018 to 2017?
and subtracted from 1?
so what was the estimated variation between the percentual decrease of these two securities?

Answers:
0.933
6.7%
0.956
4.4%
2.3%
five-year performance comparison 2013 the following graph provides an indicator of cumulative total shareholder returns for the corporation as compared to the peer group index ( described above ) , the dj trans , and the s&p 500 . the graph assumes that $ 100 was invested in the common stock of union pacific corporation and each index on december 31 , 2012 and that all dividends were reinvested . the information below is historical in nature and is not necessarily indicative of future performance . purchases of equity securities 2013 during 2017 , we repurchased 37122405 shares of our common stock at an average price of $ 110.50 . the following table presents common stock repurchases during each month for the fourth quarter of 2017 : period total number of shares purchased [a] average price paid per share total number of shares purchased as part of a publicly announced plan or program [b] maximum number of shares remaining under the plan or program [b] .

total number of shares purchased [a]: oct . 1 through oct . 31: 3831636
nov . 1 through nov . 30: 3005225
dec . 1 through dec . 31: 2718319
total: 9555180
average price paid per share: oct . 1 through oct . 31: 113.61
nov . 1 through nov . 30: 117.07
dec . 1 through dec . 31: 130.76
total: 119.58
total number of shares purchased as part of a publicly announcedplan or program [b]: oct . 1 through oct . 31: 3800000
nov . 1 through nov . 30: 2937410
dec . 1 through dec . 31: 2494100
total: 9231510
maximum number of shares remaining under the plan or program [b]: oct . 1 through oct . 31: 89078662
nov . 1 through nov . 30: 86141252
dec . 1 through dec . 31: 83647152
total: n/a

[a] total number of shares purchased during the quarter includes approximately 323670 shares delivered or attested to upc by employees to pay stock option exercise prices , satisfy excess tax withholding obligations for stock option exercises or vesting of retention units , and pay withholding obligations for vesting of retention shares . [b] effective january 1 , 2017 , our board of directors authorized the repurchase of up to 120 million shares of our common stock by december 31 , 2020 . these repurchases may be made on the open market or through other transactions . our management has sole discretion with respect to determining the timing and amount of these transactions. .

Questions:
what portion of total number of shares purchased during the fourth quarter of 2007?
what is the number of shares attested to upc by employees to pay stock option exercise prices during the last quarter of 2017?
wha about the total number of shares purchased during the fourth quarter of 2017?
what portion does this represent?

Answers:
40.1%
323670
9555180
3.4%
the company further presents total net 201ceconomic 201d investment exposure , net of deferred compensation investments and hedged investments , to reflect another gauge for investors as the economic impact of investments held pursuant to deferred compensation arrangements is substantially offset by a change in compensation expense and the impact of hedged investments is substantially mitigated by total return swap hedges . carried interest capital allocations are excluded as there is no impact to blackrock 2019s stockholders 2019 equity until such amounts are realized as performance fees . finally , the company 2019s regulatory investment in federal reserve bank stock , which is not subject to market or interest rate risk , is excluded from the company 2019s net economic investment exposure . ( dollar amounts in millions ) december 31 , december 31 .

december 31 2012: total investments gaap: 1750
investments held by consolidated sponsored investmentfunds ( 1 ): -524
net exposure to consolidated investment funds: 430
total investments as adjusted: 1656
federal reserve bank stock ( 2 ): -89
carried interest: -85
deferred compensation investments: -62
hedged investments: -209
total 201ceconomic 201d investment exposure: 1211
december 31 2011: total investments gaap: 1631
investments held by consolidated sponsored investmentfunds ( 1 ): -587
net exposure to consolidated investment funds: 475
total investments as adjusted: 1519
federal reserve bank stock ( 2 ): -328
carried interest: -21
deferred compensation investments: -65
hedged investments: -43
total 201ceconomic 201d investment exposure: 1062

total 201ceconomic 201d investment exposure . . . $ 1211 $ 1062 ( 1 ) at december 31 , 2012 and december 31 , 2011 , approximately $ 524 million and $ 587 million , respectively , of blackrock 2019s total gaap investments were maintained in sponsored investment funds that were deemed to be controlled by blackrock in accordance with gaap , and , therefore , are consolidated even though blackrock may not economically own a majority of such funds . ( 2 ) the decrease of $ 239 million related to a lower holding requirement of federal reserve bank stock held by blackrock institutional trust company , n.a . ( 201cbtc 201d ) . total investments , as adjusted , at december 31 , 2012 increased $ 137 million from december 31 , 2011 , resulting from $ 765 million of purchases/capital contributions , $ 185 million from positive market valuations and earnings from equity method investments , and $ 64 million from net additional carried interest capital allocations , partially offset by $ 742 million of sales/maturities and $ 135 million of distributions representing return of capital and return on investments. .

Questions:
what was the sum of total 2010 economic investment exposure and the positive value of investments held by consolidated sponsored investment funds?
what is the positive value of investments held?
what is that divided the total sum?

Answers:
1735
524
.302
entergy arkansas , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis results of operations net income 2004 compared to 2003 net income increased $ 16.2 million due to lower other operation and maintenance expenses , a lower effective income tax rate for 2004 compared to 2003 , and lower interest charges . the increase was partially offset by lower net revenue . 2003 compared to 2002 net income decreased $ 9.6 million due to lower net revenue , higher depreciation and amortization expenses , and a higher effective income tax rate for 2003 compared to 2002 . the decrease was substantially offset by lower other operation and maintenance expenses , higher other income , and lower interest charges . net revenue 2004 compared to 2003 net revenue , which is entergy arkansas' measure of gross margin , consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related , and purchased power expenses and 2 ) other regulatory credits . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2004 to 2003. .

( in millions ): 2003 net revenue: 998.7
deferred fuel cost revisions: -16.9
other: -3.4
2004 net revenue: 978.4

deferred fuel cost revisions includes the difference between the estimated deferred fuel expense and the actual calculation of recoverable fuel expense , which occurs on an annual basis . deferred fuel cost revisions decreased net revenue due to a revised estimate of fuel costs filed for recovery at entergy arkansas in the march 2004 energy cost recovery rider , which reduced net revenue by $ 11.5 million . the remainder of the variance is due to the 2002 energy cost recovery true-up , made in the first quarter of 2003 , which increased net revenue in 2003 . gross operating revenues , fuel and purchased power expenses , and other regulatory credits gross operating revenues increased primarily due to : 2022 an increase of $ 20.7 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due to an increase in the energy cost recovery rider effective april 2004 ( fuel cost recovery revenues are discussed in note 2 to the domestic utility companies and system energy financial statements ) ; 2022 an increase of $ 15.5 million in grand gulf revenues due to an increase in the grand gulf rider effective january 2004 ; 2022 an increase of $ 13.9 million in gross wholesale revenue primarily due to increased sales to affiliated systems ; 2022 an increase of $ 9.5 million due to volume/weather primarily resulting from increased usage during the unbilled sales period , partially offset by the effect of milder weather on billed sales in 2004. .

Questions:
what was the net change in revenues from 2003 to 2004?
what is that change over 2003 revenues?

Answers:
-20.3
-2.0%