sharick008/convfinqa huggingface dataset:
entergy louisiana , llc management's financial discussion and analysis 2007 compared to 2006 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2007 to 2006 . amount ( in millions ) .

amount ( in millions ): 2006 net revenue: 942.1
base revenues: 78.4
volume/weather: 37.5
transmission revenue: 9.2
purchased power capacity: -80
other: 3.9
2007 net revenue: 991.1

the base revenues variance is primarily due to increases effective september 2006 for the 2005 formula rate plan filing to recover lpsc-approved incremental deferred and ongoing capacity costs . see "state and local rate regulation" below and note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the formula rate plan filing . the volume/weather variance is due to increased electricity usage , including electricity sales during the unbilled service period . billed retail electricity usage increased a total of 666 gwh in all sectors compared to 2006 . see "critical accounting estimates" below and note 1 to the financial statements for further discussion of the accounting for unbilled revenues . the transmission revenue variance is primarily due to higher rates . the purchased power capacity variance is primarily due to higher purchased power capacity charges and the amortization of capacity charges effective september 2006 as a result of the formula rate plan filing in may 2006 . a portion of the purchased power capacity costs is offset in base revenues due to a base rate increase implemented to recover incremental deferred and ongoing purchased power capacity charges , as mentioned above . see "state and local rate regulation" below and note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the formula rate plan filing . gross operating revenues , fuel , purchased power expenses , and other regulatory charges ( credits ) gross operating revenues increased primarily due to : an increase of $ 143.1 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due to higher fuel rates and usage ; an increase of $ 78.4 million in base revenues , as discussed above ; and an increase of $ 37.5 million related to volume/weather , as discussed above . fuel and purchased power expenses increased primarily due to an increase in net area demand and an increase in deferred fuel expense as a result of higher fuel rates , as discussed above . other regulatory credits decreased primarily due to the deferral of capacity charges in 2006 in addition to the amortization of these capacity charges in 2007 as a result of the may 2006 formula rate plan filing ( for the 2005 test year ) with the lpsc to recover such costs through base rates effective september 2006 . see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the formula rate plan and storm cost recovery filings with the lpsc. .

Questions:
what was the 2007 net revenue?
and for 2006?
so what was the change during this time?
and the growth rate?

Answers:
991.1
942.1
49
5.2%
stock performance graph the following line-graph presentation compares our cumulative shareholder returns with the standard & poor 2019s information technology index and the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index for the past five years . the line graph assumes the investment of $ 100 in our common stock , the standard & poor 2019s information technology index , and the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index on may 31 , 2002 and assumes reinvestment of all dividends . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among global payments inc. , the s&p 500 index and the s&p information technology index 5/02 5/03 5/04 5/05 5/06 5/07 global payments inc . s&p 500 s&p information technology * $ 100 invested on 5/31/02 in stock or index-including reinvestment of dividends . fiscal year ending may 31 . global payments s&p 500 information technology .

global payments: may 31 2002: 100
may 31 2003: 94.2
may 31 2004: 129.77
may 31 2005: 193.3
may 31 2006: 260.35
may 31 2007: 224.24
s&p 500: may 31 2002: 100
may 31 2003: 91.94
may 31 2004: 108.79
may 31 2005: 117.75
may 31 2006: 127.92
may 31 2007: 157.08
s&p information technology: may 31 2002: 100
may 31 2003: 94.48
may 31 2004: 115.24
may 31 2005: 116.29
may 31 2006: 117.14
may 31 2007: 144.11

issuer purchases of equity securities on april 5 , 2007 , our board of directors authorized repurchases of our common stock in an amount up to $ 100 million . the board has authorized us to purchase shares from time to time as market conditions permit . there is no expiration date with respect to this authorization . no amounts have been repurchased during the fiscal year ended may 31 , 2007. .

Questions:
what was the value of global payments at the end of 2003 less 100?
now, what is that value divided by 100?

Answers:
-5.8
-5.8%
entergy arkansas , inc . and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis plan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business see the 201cplan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business 201d section of entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis for a discussion of this matter , including the planned retirement of debt and preferred securities . results of operations net income 2011 compared to 2010 net income decreased $ 7.7 million primarily due to a higher effective income tax rate , lower other income , and higher other operation and maintenance expenses , substantially offset by higher net revenue , lower depreciation and amortization expenses , and lower interest expense . 2010 compared to 2009 net income increased $ 105.7 million primarily due to higher net revenue , a lower effective income tax rate , higher other income , and lower depreciation and amortization expenses , partially offset by higher other operation and maintenance expenses . net revenue 2011 compared to 2010 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2011 to 2010 . amount ( in millions ) .

amount ( in millions ): 2010 net revenue: 1216.7
retail electric price: 31
ano decommissioning trust: 26.4
transmission revenue: 13.1
volume/weather: -15.9
net wholesale revenue: -11.9
capacity acquisition recovery: -10.3
other: 3.2
2011 net revenue: 1252.3

the retail electric price variance is primarily due to a base rate increase effective july 2010 . see note 2 to the financial statements for more discussion of the rate case settlement . the ano decommissioning trust variance is primarily related to the deferral of investment gains from the ano 1 and 2 decommissioning trust in 2010 in accordance with regulatory treatment . the gains resulted in an increase in 2010 in interest and investment income and a corresponding increase in regulatory charges with no effect on net income. .

Questions:
what was the 2011 net revenue?
and for 2010?
so what was the difference between these two years?
and the percentage increase during this time?

Answers:
1252.3
1216.7
35.6
2.93%
table of contents other areas in which we do business . depending on the scope of such regulation , certain of our facilities and operations , or the operations of our suppliers , may be subject to additional operating and other permit requirements , potentially resulting in increased operating costs . future regulatory developments future regulatory developments and actions could affect operations and increase operating costs for the airline industry , including our airline subsidiaries . see part i , item 1a . risk factors 2013 201cif we are unable to obtain and maintain adequate facilities and infrastructure throughout our system and , at some airports , adequate slots , we may be unable to operate our existing flight schedule and to expand or change our route network in the future , which may have a material adverse impact on our operations , 201d 201cour business is subject to extensive government regulation , which may result in increases in our costs , disruptions to our operations , limits on our operating flexibility , reductions in the demand for air travel , and competitive disadvantages 201d and 201cwe are subject to many forms of environmental regulation and may incur substantial costs as a result 201d for additional information . employees and labor relations the airline business is labor intensive . in 2015 , salaries , wages and benefits were our largest expenses and represented approximately 31% ( 31 % ) of our operating expenses . the table below presents our approximate number of active full-time equivalent employees as of december 31 , 2015 . mainline operations wholly-owned regional carriers total .

mainline operations: pilots and flight crew training instructors: 13100
flight attendants: 24100
maintenance personnel: 14400
fleet service personnel: 16100
passenger service personnel: 16500
administrative and other: 14700
total: 98900
wholly-owned regional carriers: pilots and flight crew training instructors: 3200
flight attendants: 1900
maintenance personnel: 1800
fleet service personnel: 3200
passenger service personnel: 7100
administrative and other: 2400
total: 19600
total: pilots and flight crew training instructors: 16300
flight attendants: 26000
maintenance personnel: 16200
fleet service personnel: 19300
passenger service personnel: 23600
administrative and other: 17100
total: 118500

.

Questions:
as of december 31, 2015, what percentage of the total of active full-time equivalent employees was due to flight attendants?
and how much did the number of passenger service personnel represent in relation to this flight attendants one?

Answers:
22%
0.91
performance graph the table below compares the cumulative total shareholder return on our common stock with the cumulative total return of ( i ) the standard & poor 2019s 500 composite stock index ( 201cs&p 500 index 201d ) , ( ii ) the standard & poor 2019s industrials index ( 201cs&p industrials index 201d ) and ( iii ) the standard & poor 2019s consumer durables & apparel index ( 201cs&p consumer durables & apparel index 201d ) , from december 31 , 2005 through december 31 , 2010 , when the closing price of our common stock was $ 12.66 . the graph assumes investments of $ 100 on december 31 , 2005 in our common stock and in each of the three indices and the reinvestment of dividends . performance graph 201020092008200720062005 s&p 500 index s&p industrials index s&p consumer durables & apparel index the table below sets forth the value , as of december 31 for each of the years indicated , of a $ 100 investment made on december 31 , 2005 in each of our common stock , the s&p 500 index , the s&p industrials index and the s&p consumer durables & apparel index and includes the reinvestment of dividends. .

2006: masco: 101.79
s&p 500 index: 115.61
s&p industrials index: 113.16
s&p consumer durables & apparel index: 106.16
2007: masco: 76.74
s&p 500 index: 121.95
s&p industrials index: 126.72
s&p consumer durables & apparel index: 84.5
2008: masco: 42.81
s&p 500 index: 77.38
s&p industrials index: 76.79
s&p consumer durables & apparel index: 56.13
2009: masco: 54.89
s&p 500 index: 97.44
s&p industrials index: 92.3
s&p consumer durables & apparel index: 76.51
2010: masco: 51.51
s&p 500 index: 111.89
s&p industrials index: 116.64
s&p consumer durables & apparel index: 99.87

in july 2007 , our board of directors authorized the purchase of up to 50 million shares of our common stock in open-market transactions or otherwise . at december 31 , 2010 , we had remaining authorization to repurchase up to 27 million shares . during 2010 , we repurchased and retired three million shares of our common stock , for cash aggregating $ 45 million to offset the dilutive impact of the 2010 grant of three million shares of long-term stock awards . we did not purchase any shares during the three months ended december 31 , 2010. .

Questions:
what was the difference between the price of masco in 2010 and the starting value as of 12/31/05?
so what was the percentage growth during that time?
what was the difference between the price of the s&p 500 in 2010 and the starting value as of 12/31/05?
and the original investment again?
so what was the growth rate of s&p 500 during this time?
what was the difference between the two growth rates?

Answers:
-48.49
-48.49%
11.89
100
11.89%
-60.38%
apple inc . | 2016 form 10-k | 20 company stock performance the following graph shows a comparison of cumulative total shareholder return , calculated on a dividend reinvested basis , for the company , the s&p 500 index , the s&p information technology index and the dow jones u.s . technology supersector index for the five years ended september 24 , 2016 . the graph assumes $ 100 was invested in each of the company 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index , the s&p information technology index and the dow jones u.s . technology supersector index as of the market close on september 23 , 2011 . note that historic stock price performance is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance . * $ 100 invested on 9/23/11 in stock or index , including reinvestment of dividends . data points are the last day of each fiscal year for the company 2019s common stock and september 30th for indexes . copyright a9 2016 s&p , a division of mcgraw hill financial . all rights reserved . copyright a9 2016 dow jones & co . all rights reserved . september september september september september september .

september2011: apple inc .: 100
s&p 500 index: 100
s&p information technology index: 100
dow jones u.s . technology supersector index: 100
september2012: apple inc .: 166
s&p 500 index: 130
s&p information technology index: 132
dow jones u.s . technology supersector index: 130
september2013: apple inc .: 123
s&p 500 index: 155
s&p information technology index: 142
dow jones u.s . technology supersector index: 137
september2014: apple inc .: 183
s&p 500 index: 186
s&p information technology index: 183
dow jones u.s . technology supersector index: 178
september2015: apple inc .: 212
s&p 500 index: 185
s&p information technology index: 187
dow jones u.s . technology supersector index: 177
september2016: apple inc .: 213
s&p 500 index: 213
s&p information technology index: 230
dow jones u.s . technology supersector index: 217

.

Questions:
what was the value of the apple inc . stock in 2016?
and what was the change in this value since 2011?
what was this same change for the dow jones u.s . technology supersector index stock?
and how much does this change represent in relation to the value of this stock in 2011?

Answers:
213
113
117
117%
entergy arkansas , inc . and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis results of operations net income 2016 compared to 2015 net income increased $ 92.9 million primarily due to higher net revenue and lower other operation and maintenance expenses , partially offset by a higher effective income tax rate and higher depreciation and amortization expenses . 2015 compared to 2014 net income decreased $ 47.1 million primarily due to higher other operation and maintenance expenses , partially offset by higher net revenue . net revenue 2016 compared to 2015 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2016 to 2015 . amount ( in millions ) .

amount ( in millions ): 2015 net revenue: 1362.2
retail electric price: 161.5
other: -3.2
2016 net revenue: 1520.5

the retail electric price variance is primarily due to an increase in base rates , as approved by the apsc . the new base rates were effective february 24 , 2016 and began billing with the first billing cycle of april 2016 . the increase includes an interim base rate adjustment surcharge , effective with the first billing cycle of april 2016 , to recover the incremental revenue requirement for the period february 24 , 2016 through march 31 , 2016 . a significant portion of the increase is related to the purchase of power block 2 of the union power station . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the rate case . see note 14 to the financial statements for further discussion of the union power station purchase. .

Questions:
what was the change in the net revenue for entergy arkansas , inc. from 2015 to 2016?
and what is this change as a portion of that net revenue in 2015?
what, again, was the decline in the net revenue over that period?

Answers:
158.3
11.6%
158.3
shareholder return performance presentation the graph presented below compares the cumulative total shareholder return on state street's common stock to the cumulative total return of the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index over a five-year period . the cumulative total shareholder return assumes the investment of $ 100 in state street common stock and in each index on december 31 , 2007 at the closing price on the last trading day of 2007 , and also assumes reinvestment of common stock dividends . the s&p financial index is a publicly available measure of 80 of the standard & poor's 500 companies , representing 26 diversified financial services companies , 22 insurance companies , 17 real estate companies and 15 banking companies . comparison of five-year cumulative total shareholder return .

2007: state street corporation: 100
s&p 500 index: 100
s&p financial index: 100
2008: state street corporation: 49
s&p 500 index: 63
s&p financial index: 45
2009: state street corporation: 55
s&p 500 index: 80
s&p financial index: 52
2010: state street corporation: 58
s&p 500 index: 92
s&p financial index: 59
2011: state street corporation: 52
s&p 500 index: 94
s&p financial index: 49
2012: state street corporation: 61
s&p 500 index: 109
s&p financial index: 63

.

Questions:
what was the change in the state street corporation's cumulative total shareholder return on common stock from 2008 to 2009?
how much does that change represent, in percentage, in relation to the state street corporation's cumulative total shareholder return on common stock of 2008?

Answers:
-6
-11%
performance graph this graph compares the return on lilly stock with that of the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index and our peer group for the years 2014 through 2018 . the graph assumes that , on december 31 , 2013 , a person invested $ 100 each in lilly stock , the s&p 500 stock index , and the peer groups' common stock . the graph measures total shareholder return , which takes into account both stock price and dividends . it assumes that dividends paid by a company are reinvested in that company 2019s stock . value of $ 100 invested on last business day of 2013 comparison of five-year cumulative total return among lilly , s&p 500 stock index , peer group ( 1 ) .

lilly: dec-13: 100
dec-14: 139.75
dec-15: 175.21
dec-16: 157.03
dec-17: 185.04
dec-18: 259.88
peer group: dec-13: 100
dec-14: 114.39
dec-15: 116.56
dec-16: 112.8
dec-17: 128.9
dec-18: 136.56
s&p 500: dec-13: 100
dec-14: 113.69
dec-15: 115.26
dec-16: 129.05
dec-17: 157.22
dec-18: 150.33

( 1 ) we constructed the peer group as the industry index for this graph . it comprises the companies in the pharmaceutical and biotech industries that we used to benchmark the compensation of our executive officers for 2018 : abbvie inc. ; amgen inc. ; astrazeneca plc ; baxter international inc. ; biogen idec inc. ; bristol-myers squibb company ; celgene corporation ; gilead sciences inc. ; glaxosmithkline plc ; johnson & johnson ; medtronic plc ; merck & co. , inc. ; novartis ag. ; pfizer inc. ; roche holdings ag ; sanofi ; and shire plc. .

Questions:
what was the price of lilly in 2018?
what was the net change assuming a $100 initial investment?
what is the percent change?
what was the value of the s&p in 2018 less a $100 initial investment?
what was the percent change?
what is the difference in percent changes?

Answers:
259.88
159.88
159.88%
50.33
50.33%
109.55%
celanese purchases of its equity securities information regarding repurchases of our common stock during the three months ended december 31 , 2014 is as follows : period number of shares purchased ( 1 ) average price paid per share total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced program approximate dollar value of shares remaining that may be purchased under the program ( 2 ) .

totalnumberof sharespurchased ( 1 ): october 1 - 31 2014: 192580
november 1 - 30 2014: 468128
december 1 - 31 2014: 199796
total: 860504
averageprice paidper share: october 1 - 31 2014: 58.02
november 1 - 30 2014: 59.25
december 1 - 31 2014: 60.78
total numberof sharespurchased aspart of publiclyannounced program: october 1 - 31 2014: 164800
november 1 - 30 2014: 468128
december 1 - 31 2014: 190259
total: 823187
approximatedollarvalue of sharesremaining thatmay bepurchased underthe program ( 2 ): october 1 - 31 2014: 490000000
november 1 - 30 2014: 463000000
december 1 - 31 2014: 451000000

___________________________ ( 1 ) includes 27780 and 9537 for october and december 2014 , respectively , related to shares withheld from employees to cover their statutory minimum withholding requirements for personal income taxes related to the vesting of restricted stock units . ( 2 ) our board of directors has authorized the aggregate repurchase of $ 1.4 billion of our common stock since february 2008 . see note 17 - stockholders' equity in the accompanying consolidated financial statements for further information . performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed "soliciting material" or to be "filed" with the securities and exchange commission , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that we specifically incorporate it by reference into such filing . comparison of cumulative total return .

Questions:
what was the total number of shares withheld from employees to cover their statutory minimum withholding requirements for personal income taxes in october?
and what was it in december?
what was, then, the combined total for the two months?
and how much does this combined total represent in relation to the total number of shares purchased in the last quarter of 2014, in percentage?

Answers:
27780
9537
37317
4.3%
table of contents performance graph the following performance graph shows the cumulative total return to a holder of the company 2019s common stock , assuming dividend reinvestment , compared with the cumulative total return , assuming dividend reinvestment , of the standard & poor ( "s&p" ) 500 index and the dow jones us financials index during the period from december 31 , 2010 through december 31 , 2015. .

12/10: e*trade financial corporation: 100
s&p 500 index: 100
dow jones us financials index: 100
12/11: e*trade financial corporation: 49.75
s&p 500 index: 102.11
dow jones us financials index: 87.16
12/12: e*trade financial corporation: 55.94
s&p 500 index: 118.45
dow jones us financials index: 110.56
12/13: e*trade financial corporation: 122.75
s&p 500 index: 156.82
dow jones us financials index: 148.39
12/14: e*trade financial corporation: 151.59
s&p 500 index: 178.29
dow jones us financials index: 170.04
12/15: e*trade financial corporation: 185.25
s&p 500 index: 180.75
dow jones us financials index: 170.19

.

Questions:
what is the change in the value of an investment in e*trade financial corporation from 2010 to 2015?
what return does this represent?

Answers:
85.25
85.25%