sharick008/convfinqa huggingface dataset:
the contractual maturities of held-to-maturity securities as of january 30 , 2009 were in excess of three years and were $ 31.4 million at cost and $ 28.9 million at fair value , respectively . for the successor year ended january 30 , 2009 and period ended february 1 , 2008 , and the predecessor period ended july 6 , 2007 and year ended february 2 , 2007 , gross realized gains and losses on the sales of available-for-sale securities were not material . the cost of securities sold is based upon the specific identification method . merchandise inventories inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market with cost determined using the retail last-in , first-out ( 201clifo 201d ) method . under the company 2019s retail inventory method ( 201crim 201d ) , the calculation of gross profit and the resulting valuation of inventories at cost are computed by applying a calculated cost-to-retail inventory ratio to the retail value of sales at a department level . costs directly associated with warehousing and distribution are capitalized into inventory . the excess of current cost over lifo cost was approximately $ 50.0 million at january 30 , 2009 and $ 6.1 million at february 1 , 2008 . current cost is determined using the retail first-in , first-out method . the company 2019s lifo reserves were adjusted to zero at july 6 , 2007 as a result of the merger . the successor recorded lifo provisions of $ 43.9 million and $ 6.1 million during 2008 and 2007 , respectively . the predecessor recorded a lifo credit of $ 1.5 million in 2006 . in 2008 , the increased commodity cost pressures mainly related to food and pet products which have been driven by fruit and vegetable prices and rising freight costs . increases in petroleum , resin , metals , pulp and other raw material commodity driven costs also resulted in multiple product cost increases . the company intends to address these commodity cost increases through negotiations with its vendors and by increasing retail prices as necessary . on a quarterly basis , the company estimates the annual impact of commodity cost fluctuations based upon the best available information at that point in time . store pre-opening costs pre-opening costs related to new store openings and the construction periods are expensed as incurred . property and equipment property and equipment are recorded at cost . the company provides for depreciation and amortization on a straight-line basis over the following estimated useful lives: .

20: buildings: 39
furniture fixtures and equipment: 3

improvements of leased properties are amortized over the shorter of the life of the applicable lease term or the estimated useful life of the asset. .

Questions:
what was the value change in held-to-maturity securities at cost and at fair value between?
what was the value of contractual maturities of held-to-maturity securities as of january 30, 2009, in fair value?
what was the percent change?

Answers:
-2.5
31.4
-8.0%
the following is a schedule of future minimum rental payments required under long-term operating leases at october 29 , 2011 : fiscal years operating leases .

operating leases: 2012: 17590
2013: 12724
2014: 6951
2015: 5649
2016: 3669
later years: 19472
total: 66055

12 . commitments and contingencies from time to time in the ordinary course of the company 2019s business , various claims , charges and litigation are asserted or commenced against the company arising from , or related to , contractual matters , patents , trademarks , personal injury , environmental matters , product liability , insurance coverage and personnel and employment disputes . as to such claims and litigation , the company can give no assurance that it will prevail . the company does not believe that any current legal matters will have a material adverse effect on the company 2019s financial position , results of operations or cash flows . 13 . retirement plans the company and its subsidiaries have various savings and retirement plans covering substantially all employees . the company maintains a defined contribution plan for the benefit of its eligible u.s . employees . this plan provides for company contributions of up to 5% ( 5 % ) of each participant 2019s total eligible compensation . in addition , the company contributes an amount equal to each participant 2019s pre-tax contribution , if any , up to a maximum of 3% ( 3 % ) of each participant 2019s total eligible compensation . the total expense related to the defined contribution plan for u.s . employees was $ 21.9 million in fiscal 2011 , $ 20.5 million in fiscal 2010 and $ 21.5 million in fiscal 2009 . the company also has various defined benefit pension and other retirement plans for certain non-u.s . employees that are consistent with local statutory requirements and practices . the total expense related to the various defined benefit pension and other retirement plans for certain non-u.s . employees was $ 21.4 million in fiscal 2011 , $ 11.7 million in fiscal 2010 and $ 10.9 million in fiscal 2009 . non-u.s . plan disclosures the company 2019s funding policy for its foreign defined benefit pension plans is consistent with the local requirements of each country . the plans 2019 assets consist primarily of u.s . and non-u.s . equity securities , bonds , property and cash . the benefit obligations and related assets under these plans have been measured at october 29 , 2011 and october 30 , 2010 . analog devices , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) .

Questions:
what is the increase in the total expense related to the defined contribution plan for non-u.s.employees from 2010 to 2011?
what is the total expense related to the defined contribution plan for non-u.s.employees in 2010?
what growth rate does this represent?

Answers:
9.7
11.7
82.9%
( 3 ) refer to note 2 201csummary of significant accounting principles and practices 201d for further information . 13 . employee benefitsp y defined contribution savings plans aon maintains defined contribution savings plans for the benefit of its employees . the expense recognized for these plans is included in compensation and benefits in the consolidated statements of income . the expense for the significant plans in the u.s. , u.k. , netherlands and canada is as follows ( in millions ) : .

2018: u.s .: 98
u.k .: 45
netherlands and canada: 25
total: 168
2017: u.s .: 105
u.k .: 43
netherlands and canada: 25
total: 173
2016: u.s .: 121
u.k .: 43
netherlands and canada: 27
total: 191

pension and other postretirement benefits the company sponsors defined benefit pension and postretirement health and welfare plans that provide retirement , medical , and life insurance benefits . the postretirement health care plans are contributory , with retiree contributions adjusted annually , and the aa life insurance and pension plans are generally noncontributory . the significant u.s. , u.k. , netherlands and canadian pension plans are closed to new entrants. .

Questions:
what portion of total benefit expense for plans in u.s. in 2018?
what is the total benefit expense in 2018?
what about in 2017?
what is the net change among these years?

Answers:
58.3%
168
173
-5
performance graph the performance graph below shows the five-year cumulative total stockholder return on applied common stock during the period from october 28 , 2012 through october 29 , 2017 . this is compared with the cumulative total return of the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index and the rdg semiconductor composite index over the same period . the comparison assumes $ 100 was invested on october 28 , 2012 in applied common stock and in each of the foregoing indices and assumes reinvestment of dividends , if any . dollar amounts in the graph are rounded to the nearest whole dollar . the performance shown in the graph represents past performance and should not be considered an indication of future performance . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among applied materials , inc. , the s&p 500 index and the rdg semiconductor composite index *assumes $ 100 invested on 10/28/12 in stock or 10/31/12 in index , including reinvestment of dividends . indexes calculated on month-end basis . copyright a9 2017 standard & poor 2019s , a division of s&p global . all rights reserved. .

10/28/2012: applied materials: 100
s&p 500 index: 100
rdg semiconductor composite index: 100
10/27/2013: applied materials: 171.03
s&p 500 index: 127.18
rdg semiconductor composite index: 131.94
10/26/2014: applied materials: 207.01
s&p 500 index: 149.14
rdg semiconductor composite index: 167.25
10/25/2015: applied materials: 165.34
s&p 500 index: 156.89
rdg semiconductor composite index: 160.8
10/30/2016: applied materials: 293.64
s&p 500 index: 163.97
rdg semiconductor composite index: 193.36
10/29/2017: applied materials: 586.91
s&p 500 index: 202.72
rdg semiconductor composite index: 288.96

dividends during each of fiscal 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , applied 2019s board of directors declared four quarterly cash dividends in the amount of $ 0.10 per share . applied currently anticipates that cash dividends will continue to be paid on a quarterly basis , although the declaration of any future cash dividend is at the discretion of the board of directors and will depend on applied 2019s financial condition , results of operations , capital requirements , business conditions and other factors , as well as a determination by the board of directors that cash dividends are in the best interests of applied 2019s stockholders . 10/28/12 10/27/13 10/26/14 10/25/15 10/30/16 10/29/17 applied materials , inc . s&p 500 rdg semiconductor composite .

Questions:
what is the net change in value of an $100 investment in applied materials from 2012 to 2015?
what roi does this represent?
what about the net change in value in s&p500 for the same period?
what is the roi of s&p500?

Answers:
65.34
65.3%
56.89
56.9%
federal realty investment trust schedule iii summary of real estate and accumulated depreciation 2014continued three years ended december 31 , 2009 reconciliation of accumulated depreciation and amortization ( in thousands ) .

$ 740507: additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense: 103.698
deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property: -11869
balance december 31 2007: 756703
balance december 31 2008: 846258
balance december 31 2009: 938087

.

Questions:
combined, what were the additions in 2006 and 207?
and in 2008?
and converting this value into millions?
now combined with the values from 2006 and 2007?
so what is the average of these values?

Answers:
197775
103.698
103698
301473
100491
s c h e d u l e i v ( continued ) ace limited and subsidiaries s u p p l e m e n t a l i n f o r m a t i o n c o n c e r n i n g r e i n s u r a n c e premiums earned for the years ended december 31 , 2008 , 2007 , and 2006 ( in millions of u.s . dollars ) direct amount ceded to companies assumed from other companies net amount percentage of amount assumed to .

direct amount: 2008: 16087
2007: 14673
2006: 13562
ceded to other companies: 2008: 6144
2007: 5834
2006: 5198
assumed from other companies: 2008: 3260
2007: 3458
2006: 3461
net amount: 2008: 13203
2007: 12297
2006: 11825
percentage of amount assumed to net: 2008: -25
2007: -28
2006: -29

.

Questions:
what was the net amount in 2008?
what was the net amount in 2007?
what was the change in value?
what was the percent change?

Answers:
13203
12297
906
7.4%
the grand gulf recovery variance is primarily due to increased recovery of higher costs resulting from the grand gulf uprate . the volume/weather variance is primarily due to the effects of more favorable weather on residential sales and an increase in industrial sales primarily due to growth in the refining segment . the fuel recovery variance is primarily due to : 2022 the deferral of increased capacity costs that will be recovered through fuel adjustment clauses ; 2022 the expiration of the evangeline gas contract on january 1 , 2013 ; and 2022 an adjustment to deferred fuel costs recorded in the third quarter 2012 in accordance with a rate order from the puct issued in september 2012 . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of this puct order issued in entergy texas's 2011 rate case . the miso deferral variance is primarily due to the deferral in april 2013 , as approved by the apsc , of costs incurred since march 2010 related to the transition and implementation of joining the miso rto . the decommissioning trusts variance is primarily due to lower regulatory credits resulting from higher realized income on decommissioning trust fund investments . there is no effect on net income as the credits are offset by interest and investment income . entergy wholesale commodities following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2013 to 2012 . amount ( in millions ) .

amount ( in millions ): 2012 net revenue: 1854
mark-to-market: -58
nuclear volume: -24
nuclear fuel expenses: -20
nuclear realized price changes: 58
other: -8
2013 net revenue: 1802

as shown in the table above , net revenue for entergy wholesale commodities decreased by approximately $ 52 million in 2013 primarily due to : 2022 the effect of rising forward power prices on electricity derivative instruments that are not designated as hedges , including additional financial power sales conducted in the fourth quarter 2013 to offset the planned exercise of in-the-money protective call options and to lock in margins . these additional sales did not qualify for hedge accounting treatment , and increases in forward prices after those sales were made accounted for the majority of the negative mark-to-market variance . it is expected that the underlying transactions will result in earnings in first quarter 2014 as these positions settle . see note 16 to the financial statements for discussion of derivative instruments ; 2022 the decrease in net revenue compared to prior year resulting from the exercise of resupply options provided for in purchase power agreements where entergy wholesale commodities may elect to supply power from another source when the plant is not running . amounts related to the exercise of resupply options are included in the gwh billed in the table below ; and entergy corporation and subsidiaries management's financial discussion and analysis .

Questions:
what is the difference in revenue between 2012 and 2013?
what percentage change does this represent?

Answers:
52
112%
entergy arkansas , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis results of operations net income 2008 compared to 2007 net income decreased $ 92.0 million primarily due to higher other operation and maintenance expenses , higher depreciation and amortization expenses , and a higher effective income tax rate , partially offset by higher net revenue . the higher other operation and maintenance expenses resulted primarily from the write-off of approximately $ 70.8 million of costs as a result of the december 2008 arkansas court of appeals decision in entergy arkansas' base rate case . the base rate case is discussed in more detail in note 2 to the financial statements . 2007 compared to 2006 net income decreased $ 34.0 million primarily due to higher other operation and maintenance expenses , higher depreciation and amortization expenses , and a higher effective income tax rate . the decrease was partially offset by higher net revenue . net revenue 2008 compared to 2007 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory credits . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2008 to 2007 . amount ( in millions ) .

amount ( in millions ): 2007 net revenue: 1110.6
rider revenue: 13.6
purchased power capacity: 4.8
volume/weather: -14.6
other: 3.5
2008 net revenue: 1117.9

the rider revenue variance is primarily due to an energy efficiency rider which became effective in november 2007 . the establishment of the rider results in an increase in rider revenue and a corresponding increase in other operation and maintenance expense with no effect on net income . also contributing to the variance was an increase in franchise tax rider revenue as a result of higher retail revenues . the corresponding increase is in taxes other than income taxes , resulting in no effect on net income . the purchased power capacity variance is primarily due to lower reserve equalization expenses . the volume/weather variance is primarily due to the effect of less favorable weather on residential and commercial sales during the billed and unbilled sales periods compared to 2007 and a 2.9% ( 2.9 % ) volume decrease in industrial sales , primarily in the wood industry and the small customer class . billed electricity usage decreased 333 gwh in all sectors . see "critical accounting estimates" below and note 1 to the financial statements for further discussion of the accounting for unbilled revenues. .

Questions:
what was the net revenue in 2007?
and in 2008?
so what was the difference between these two values?
and the percentage change during this time?

Answers:
1110.6
1117.9
7.3
0.7%
marathon oil corporation notes to consolidated financial statements 7 . dispositions outside-operated norwegian properties 2013 on october 31 , 2008 , we closed the sale of our norwegian outside-operated properties and undeveloped offshore acreage in the heimdal area of the norwegian north sea for net proceeds of $ 301 million , with a pretax gain of $ 254 million as of december 31 , 2008 . pilot travel centers 2013 on october 8 , 2008 , we completed the sale of our 50 percent ownership interest in ptc . sale proceeds were $ 625 million , with a pretax gain on the sale of $ 126 million . immediately preceding the sale , we received a $ 75 million partial redemption of our ownership interest from ptc that was accounted for as a return of investment . operated irish properties 2013 on december 17 , 2008 , we agreed to sell our operated properties located in ireland for proceeds of $ 180 million , before post-closing adjustments and cash on hand at closing . closing is subject to completion of the necessary administrative processes . as of december 31 , 2008 , operating assets and liabilities were classified as held for sale , as disclosed by major class in the following table : ( in millions ) 2008 .

2008: current assets: 164
noncurrent assets: 103
total assets: 267
current liabilities: 62
noncurrent liabilities: 199
total liabilities: 261
net assets held for sale: 6

8 . discontinued operations on june 2 , 2006 , we sold our russian oil exploration and production businesses in the khanty-mansiysk region of western siberia . under the terms of the agreement , we received $ 787 million for these businesses , plus preliminary working capital and other closing adjustments of $ 56 million , for a total transaction value of $ 843 million . proceeds net of transaction costs and cash held by the russian businesses at the transaction date totaled $ 832 million . a gain on the sale of $ 243 million ( $ 342 million before income taxes ) was reported in discontinued operations for 2006 . income taxes on this gain were reduced by the utilization of a capital loss carryforward . exploration and production segment goodwill of $ 21 million was allocated to the russian assets and reduced the reported gain . adjustments to the sales price were completed in 2007 and an additional gain on the sale of $ 8 million ( $ 13 million before income taxes ) was recognized . the activities of the russian businesses have been reported as discontinued operations in the consolidated statements of income and the consolidated statements of cash flows for 2006 . revenues applicable to discontinued operations were $ 173 million and pretax income from discontinued operations was $ 45 million for 2006. .

Questions:
what is the balance of current assets in 2008?
what about in the current liabilities?
what is the current ratio?
what is the value of current assets?
what about the value of non-current assets?
what is the sum of total assets?
what about the average of current and noncurrent assets?

Answers:
164
62
2.65
164
103
266.0
133
subject to fluctuation and , consequently , the amount realized in the subsequent sale of an investment may differ significantly from its current reported value . fluctuations in the market price of a security may result from perceived changes in the underlying economic characteristics of the issuer , the relative price of alternative investments and general market conditions . the table below summarizes equity investments that are subject to equity price fluctuations at december 31 , 2012 . equity investments are included in other assets in our consolidated balance sheets . ( in millions ) carrying unrealized net of tax .

costbasis: bm&fbovespa s.a .: 262.9
bolsa mexicana de valores s.a.b . de c.v .: 17.3
imarex asa: 2014
fairvalue: bm&fbovespa s.a .: 690.6
bolsa mexicana de valores s.a.b . de c.v .: 29.3
imarex asa: 1.8
carryingvalue: bm&fbovespa s.a .: 690.6
bolsa mexicana de valores s.a.b . de c.v .: 29.3
imarex asa: 1.8
unrealizedgainnet of tax: bm&fbovespa s.a .: 271.4
bolsa mexicana de valores s.a.b . de c.v .: 7.6
imarex asa: 1.1

we do not currently hedge against equity price risk . equity investments are assessed for other-than- temporary impairment on a quarterly basis. .

Questions:
in 2012, what was the total combined amount of the fair value and the cost basis for the the bm&fbovespa s.a .?
and what was the difference between that fair value and the cost basis for the bolsa mexicana de valores s.a.b . de c.v .?

Answers:
2.63
12
22 2016 annual report performance graph the following chart presents a comparison for the five-year period ended june 30 , 2016 , of the market performance of the company 2019s common stock with the s&p 500 index and an index of peer companies selected by the company : comparison of 5 year cumulative total return among jack henry & associates , inc. , the s&p 500 index , and a peer group the following information depicts a line graph with the following values: .

2011: jkhy: 100
peer group: 100
s&p 500: 100
2012: jkhy: 116.62
peer group: 107.65
s&p 500: 105.45
2013: jkhy: 161.33
peer group: 126.89
s&p 500: 127.17
2014: jkhy: 206.53
peer group: 174.28
s&p 500: 158.46
2015: jkhy: 228.24
peer group: 219.46
s&p 500: 170.22
2016: jkhy: 312.11
peer group: 251.24
s&p 500: 177.02

this comparison assumes $ 100 was invested on june 30 , 2011 , and assumes reinvestments of dividends . total returns are calculated according to market capitalization of peer group members at the beginning of each period . peer companies selected are in the business of providing specialized computer software , hardware and related services to financial institutions and other businesses . companies in the peer group are aci worldwide , inc. , bottomline technology , inc. , broadridge financial solutions , cardtronics , inc. , convergys corp. , corelogic , inc. , dst systems , inc. , euronet worldwide , inc. , fair isaac corp. , fidelity national information services , inc. , fiserv , inc. , global payments , inc. , moneygram international , inc. , ss&c technologies holdings , inc. , total systems services , inc. , tyler technologies , inc. , verifone systems , inc. , and wex , inc. . heartland payment systems , inc . was removed from the peer group as it merged with global payments , inc . in april 2016. .

Questions:
what was the change in the performance value of the peer group stock from 2014 to 2016?
and what is this change as a percent of that value in 2014?
and concerning only the first year shown in the graph, from 2011 to 2012, what was that change for the s&p 500 stock?

Answers:
45.18
25.9%
5.45