sharick008/convfinqa huggingface dataset:
part ii item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities the following table presents reported quarterly high and low per share sale prices of our common stock on the new york stock exchange ( 201cnyse 201d ) for the years 2008 and 2007. .

high: quarter ended march 31: 41.31
quarter ended june 30: 43.84
quarter ended september 30: 45.45
quarter ended december 31: 46.53
2007: high
low: quarter ended march 31: 36.63
quarter ended june 30: 37.64
quarter ended september 30: 36.34
quarter ended december 31: 40.08
2007: low

on february 13 , 2009 , the closing price of our common stock was $ 28.85 per share as reported on the nyse . as of february 13 , 2009 , we had 397097677 outstanding shares of common stock and 499 registered holders . dividends we have never paid a dividend on our common stock . we anticipate that we may retain future earnings , if any , to fund the development and growth of our business . the indentures governing our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) senior notes due 2012 ( 201c7.50% ( 201c7.50 % ) notes 201d ) and our 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) senior notes due 2012 ( 201c7.125% ( 201c7.125 % ) notes 201d ) may prohibit us from paying dividends to our stockholders unless we satisfy certain financial covenants . the loan agreement for our revolving credit facility and term loan , and the indentures governing the terms of our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) notes and 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) notes contain covenants that restrict our ability to pay dividends unless certain financial covenants are satisfied . in addition , while spectrasite and its subsidiaries are classified as unrestricted subsidiaries under the indentures for our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) notes and 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) notes , certain of spectrasite 2019s subsidiaries are subject to restrictions on the amount of cash that they can distribute to us under the loan agreement related to our securitization transaction . for more information about the restrictions under the loan agreement for the revolving credit facility and term loan , our notes indentures and the loan agreement related to our securitization transaction , see item 7 of this annual report under the caption 201cmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2014liquidity and capital resources 2014factors affecting sources of liquidity 201d and note 6 to our consolidated financial statements included in this annual report. .

Questions:
as of february 13, 2009, what was the average number of outstanding shares of common stock per registered holder?
and what was the full value of those shares?

Answers:
795786.9
11456267981.5
stockholder return performance graphs the following graph compares the cumulative 5-year total stockholder return on our common stock relative to the cumulative total return of the nasdaq composite index and the s&p 400 information technology index . the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock and in each index ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 on december 29 , 2007 and tracks it through december 29 , 2012 . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among cadence design systems , inc. , the nasdaq composite index , and s&p 400 information technology cadence design systems , inc . nasdaq composite s&p 400 information technology 12/29/1212/31/111/1/111/2/101/3/0912/29/07 *$ 100 invested on 12/29/07 in stock or 12/31/07 in index , including reinvestment of dividends . indexes calculated on month-end basis . copyright a9 2013 s&p , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved. .

12/29/2007: cadence design systems inc .: 100
nasdaq composite: 100
s&p 400 information technology: 100
1/3/2009: cadence design systems inc .: 22.55
nasdaq composite: 59.03
s&p 400 information technology: 54.6
1/2/2010: cadence design systems inc .: 35.17
nasdaq composite: 82.25
s&p 400 information technology: 82.76
1/1/2011: cadence design systems inc .: 48.5
nasdaq composite: 97.32
s&p 400 information technology: 108.11
12/31/2011: cadence design systems inc .: 61.07
nasdaq composite: 98.63
s&p 400 information technology: 95.48
12/29/2012: cadence design systems inc .: 78.92
nasdaq composite: 110.78
s&p 400 information technology: 109.88

the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance .

Questions:
what is the net change in the price of the nasdaq composite from 2008 to 2012?
what is that over 100?

Answers:
10.78
10.8%
performance graph the graph below compares the cumulative total shareholder return on pmi's common stock with the cumulative total return for the same period of pmi's peer group and the s&p 500 index . the graph assumes the investment of $ 100 as of december 31 , 2013 , in pmi common stock ( at prices quoted on the new york stock exchange ) and each of the indices as of the market close and reinvestment of dividends on a quarterly basis . date pmi pmi peer group ( 1 ) s&p 500 index .

pmi: december 31 2013: 100
december 31 2014: 97.9
december 31 2015: 111
december 31 2016: 120.5
december 31 2017: 144.5
december 31 2018: 96.5
pmi peer group ( 1 ): december 31 2013: 100
december 31 2014: 107.8
december 31 2015: 116.8
december 31 2016: 118.4
december 31 2017: 140.5
december 31 2018: 127.7
s&p 500 index: december 31 2013: 100
december 31 2014: 113.7
december 31 2015: 115.3
december 31 2016: 129
december 31 2017: 157.2
december 31 2018: 150.3

( 1 ) the pmi peer group presented in this graph is the same as that used in the prior year . the pmi peer group was established based on a review of four characteristics : global presence ; a focus on consumer products ; and net revenues and a market capitalization of a similar size to those of pmi . the review also considered the primary international tobacco companies . as a result of this review , the following companies constitute the pmi peer group : altria group , inc. , anheuser-busch inbev sa/nv , british american tobacco p.l.c. , the coca-cola company , colgate-palmolive co. , diageo plc , heineken n.v. , imperial brands plc , japan tobacco inc. , johnson & johnson , kimberly-clark corporation , the kraft-heinz company , mcdonald's corp. , mondel z international , inc. , nestl e9 s.a. , pepsico , inc. , the procter & gamble company , roche holding ag , and unilever nv and plc . note : figures are rounded to the nearest $ 0.10. .

Questions:
what was the price performance of the pmi in 2014?
and by what amount did it change since 2013?
what is this amount as a portion of that price in 2013?
and what was the change in the performance price of that stock for the full five years shown in the chart?
what is this five year change as a percent of the 2013 price?
and in this same period, what was that change for the s&p 500 index?
and what was this s&p 500 index change as a percentage of its price performance in 2013?
what is, then, the difference between the pmi percentage and this s&p 500 index one for the five years?

Answers:
97.90
2.1
2.1%
-3.5
-3.5%
50.3
50.3%
53.8%
the following graph compares the cumulative 5-year total return to shareholders of cadence design systems , inc . 2019s common stock relative to the cumulative total returns of the s & p 500 index , the nasdaq composite index and the s & p information technology index . the graph assumes that the value of the investment in the company 2019s common stock and in each of the indexes ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 on december 29 , 2001 and tracks it through december 30 , 2006 . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among cadence design systems , inc. , the s & p 500 index , the nasdaq composite index and the s & p information technology index 12/30/0612/31/051/1/051/3/0412/28/0212/29/01 cadence design systems , inc . nasdaq composite s & p information technology s & p 500 * $ 100 invested on 12/29/01 in stock or on 12/31/01 in index-incuding reinvestment of dividends . indexes calculated on month-end basis . copyright b7 2007 , standard & poor 2019s , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies , inc . all rights reserved . www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm december 29 , december 28 , january 3 , january 1 , december 31 , december 30 .

december 29 2001: cadence design systems inc .: 100
s & p 500: 100
nasdaq composite: 100
s & p information technology: 100
december 28 2002: cadence design systems inc .: 54.38
s & p 500: 77.9
nasdaq composite: 71.97
s & p information technology: 62.59
january 3 2004: cadence design systems inc .: 81.52
s & p 500: 100.24
nasdaq composite: 107.18
s & p information technology: 92.14
january 1 2005: cadence design systems inc .: 61.65
s & p 500: 111.15
nasdaq composite: 117.07
s & p information technology: 94.5
december 31 2005: cadence design systems inc .: 75.54
s & p 500: 116.61
nasdaq composite: 120.5
s & p information technology: 95.44
december 30 2006: cadence design systems inc .: 79.96
s & p 500: 135.03
nasdaq composite: 137.02
s & p information technology: 103.47

.

Questions:
what is the value of cadence design systems in 2006 less 100?
what is that difference divided by 100?

Answers:
-20.04
-20.04%
part ii item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities the following table presents reported quarterly high and low per share sale prices of our common stock on the new york stock exchange ( 201cnyse 201d ) for the years 2008 and 2007. .

high: quarter ended march 31: 41.31
quarter ended june 30: 43.84
quarter ended september 30: 45.45
quarter ended december 31: 46.53
2007: high
low: quarter ended march 31: 36.63
quarter ended june 30: 37.64
quarter ended september 30: 36.34
quarter ended december 31: 40.08
2007: low

on february 13 , 2009 , the closing price of our common stock was $ 28.85 per share as reported on the nyse . as of february 13 , 2009 , we had 397097677 outstanding shares of common stock and 499 registered holders . dividends we have never paid a dividend on our common stock . we anticipate that we may retain future earnings , if any , to fund the development and growth of our business . the indentures governing our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) senior notes due 2012 ( 201c7.50% ( 201c7.50 % ) notes 201d ) and our 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) senior notes due 2012 ( 201c7.125% ( 201c7.125 % ) notes 201d ) may prohibit us from paying dividends to our stockholders unless we satisfy certain financial covenants . the loan agreement for our revolving credit facility and term loan , and the indentures governing the terms of our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) notes and 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) notes contain covenants that restrict our ability to pay dividends unless certain financial covenants are satisfied . in addition , while spectrasite and its subsidiaries are classified as unrestricted subsidiaries under the indentures for our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) notes and 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) notes , certain of spectrasite 2019s subsidiaries are subject to restrictions on the amount of cash that they can distribute to us under the loan agreement related to our securitization transaction . for more information about the restrictions under the loan agreement for the revolving credit facility and term loan , our notes indentures and the loan agreement related to our securitization transaction , see item 7 of this annual report under the caption 201cmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2014liquidity and capital resources 2014factors affecting sources of liquidity 201d and note 6 to our consolidated financial statements included in this annual report. .

Questions:
what was the highest price of the company's share price for the quarter ended march 31, 2008?
what was the lowest price?
what is the net difference?
what was the low price?
what is the net difference over the low price?

Answers:
42.72
32.10
10.62
32.10
33.1%
simplify the presentation of deferred income taxes and reduce complexity without decreasing the usefulness of information provided to users of financial statements . the adoption of this pronouncement did not have a significant impact on the company 2019s financial position , results of operations and cash flows . 3 . acquisitions endomondo on january 5 , 2015 , the company acquired 100% ( 100 % ) of the outstanding equity of endomondo , a denmark- based digital connected fitness company , to expand the under armour connected fitness community . the purchase price was $ 85.0 million , adjusted for working capital . the company recognized $ 0.6 million and $ 0.8 million in acquisition related costs that were expensed during the three months ended march 31 , 2015 and december 31 , 2014 , respectively . these costs are included in the consolidated statements of income in the line item entitled 201cselling , general and administrative expenses . 201d pro forma results are not presented , as the acquisition was not considered material to the consolidated company . myfitnesspal on march 17 , 2015 , the company acquired 100% ( 100 % ) of the outstanding equity of mfp , a digital nutrition and connected fitness company , to expand the under armour connected fitness community . the final adjusted transaction value totaled $ 474.0 million . the total consideration of $ 463.9 million was adjusted to reflect the accelerated vesting of certain share awards of mfp , which are not conditioned upon continued employment , and transaction costs borne by the selling shareholders . the acquisition was funded with $ 400.0 million of increased term loan borrowings and a draw on the revolving credit facility , with the remaining amount funded by cash on the company recognized $ 5.7 million of acquisition related costs that were expensed during the three months ended march 31 , 2015 . these costs are included in the consolidated statement of income in the line item entitled 201cselling , general and administrative expenses . 201d the following represents the pro forma consolidated income statement as if mfp had been included in the consolidated results of the company for the year ended december 31 , 2015 and december 31 , 2014: .

year ended december 31 , 2015: net revenues: 3967008
net income: 231277
year ended december 31 , 2014: net revenues: 3098341
net income: 189659

these amounts have been calculated after applying the company 2019s accounting policies and adjusting the results of mfp to reflect the acquisition as if it closed on january 1 , 2014 . pro forma net income for the year ended december 31 , 2014 includes $ 5.7 million in transaction expenses which were included in the consolidated statement of income for the year ended december 31 , 2015 , but excluded from the calculation of pro forma net income for december 31 , 2015. .

Questions:
what was the profit margin in 2015?
what was the ratio of the acquisition related costs recognized in 2015 to 2014?

Answers:
5.8%
0.75
entergy texas , inc . and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis results of operations net income 2016 compared to 2015 net income increased $ 37.9 million primarily due to lower other operation and maintenance expenses , the asset write-off of its receivable associated with the spindletop gas storage facility in 2015 , and higher net revenue . 2015 compared to 2014 net income decreased $ 5.2 million primarily due to the asset write-off of its receivable associated with the spindletop gas storage facility and higher other operation and maintenance expenses , partially offset by higher net revenue and a lower effective tax rate . net revenue 2016 compared to 2015 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2016 to 2015 . amount ( in millions ) .

amount ( in millions ): 2015 net revenue: 637.2
reserve equalization: 14.3
purchased power capacity: 12.4
transmission revenue: 7
retail electric price: 5.4
net wholesale: -27.8
other: -4.3
2016 net revenue: 644.2

the reserve equalization variance is primarily due to a reduction in reserve equalization expense primarily due to changes in the entergy system generation mix compared to the same period in 2015 as a result of the execution of a new purchased power agreement and entergy mississippi 2019s exit from the system agreement , each in november 2015 , and entergy texas 2019s exit from the system agreement in august 2016 . see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the system agreement . the purchased power capacity variance is primarily due to decreased expenses due to the termination of the purchased power agreements between entergy louisiana and entergy texas in august 2016 , as well as capacity cost changes for ongoing purchased power capacity contracts . the transmission revenue variance is primarily due to an increase in attachment o rates charged by miso to transmission customers and a settlement of attachment o rates previously billed to transmission customers by miso. .

Questions:
what was the total value of both the reserve equalization and the purchased power capacity as a change in net revenue from 2015 to 2016, in millions?
including the transmission revenue, what then becomes that total value?

Answers:
26.7
33.7
part ii . item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities our common stock is traded on the nasdaq global select market under the symbol cdns . as of february 2 , 2019 , we had 523 registered stockholders and approximately 56000 beneficial owners of our common stock . stockholder return performance graph the following graph compares the cumulative 5-year total stockholder return on our common stock relative to the cumulative total return of the nasdaq composite index , the s&p 500 index and the s&p 500 information technology index . the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock and in each index on december 28 , 2013 ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 and tracks it each year thereafter on the last day of our fiscal year through december 29 , 2018 and , for each index , on the last day of the calendar year . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among cadence design systems , inc. , the nasdaq composite index , the s&p 500 index and the s&p 500 information technology index 12/29/181/2/16 12/30/1712/28/13 12/31/161/3/15 *$ 100 invested on 12/28/13 in stock or index , including reinvestment of dividends . fiscal year ending december 29 . copyright a9 2019 standard & poor 2019s , a division of s&p global . all rights reserved . nasdaq compositecadence design systems , inc . s&p 500 s&p 500 information technology .

12/28/2013: cadence design systems inc .: 100
nasdaq composite: 100
s&p 500: 100
s&p 500 information technology: 100
1/3/2015: cadence design systems inc .: 135.18
nasdaq composite: 112.6
s&p 500: 110.28
s&p 500 information technology: 115.49
1/2/2016: cadence design systems inc .: 149.39
nasdaq composite: 113.64
s&p 500: 109.54
s&p 500 information technology: 121.08
12/31/2016: cadence design systems inc .: 181.05
nasdaq composite: 133.19
s&p 500: 129.05
s&p 500 information technology: 144.85
12/30/2017: cadence design systems inc .: 300.22
nasdaq composite: 172.11
s&p 500: 157.22
s&p 500 information technology: 201.1
12/29/2018: cadence design systems inc .: 311.13
nasdaq composite: 165.84
s&p 500: 150.33
s&p 500 information technology: 200.52

the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance. .

Questions:
what is the value of cadence design system in 2018 less an initial investment of $100?
what is that divided by 100?
what is the value of the nasdaq composite in 2018 less 100?
what is that divided by 100?
what is the difference of the cadence percent change and that of the nasdaq?

Answers:
211.13
211.13%
65.84
65.84%
145.29%
performance graph comparison of five-year cumulative total return the following graph and table compare the cumulative total return on citi 2019s common stock , which is listed on the nyse under the ticker symbol 201cc 201d and held by 65691 common stockholders of record as of january 31 , 2018 , with the cumulative total return of the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index over the five-year period through december 31 , 2017 . the graph and table assume that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2012 in citi 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index , and that all dividends were reinvested . comparison of five-year cumulative total return for the years ended date citi s&p 500 financials .

citi: 31-dec-2012: 100
31-dec-2013: 131.8
31-dec-2014: 137
31-dec-2015: 131.4
31-dec-2016: 152.3
31-dec-2017: 193.5
s&p 500: 31-dec-2012: 100
31-dec-2013: 132.4
31-dec-2014: 150.5
31-dec-2015: 152.6
31-dec-2016: 170.8
31-dec-2017: 208.1
s&p financials: 31-dec-2012: 100
31-dec-2013: 135.6
31-dec-2014: 156.2
31-dec-2015: 153.9
31-dec-2016: 188.9
31-dec-2017: 230.9

.

Questions:
what was the fluctuation in the total return of citi common stock for the five year period ended 2017?
and what is this fluctuation as a percentage of that return in 2012?
in that same period, what was that fluctuation for the s&p 500?
how much did this s&p 500 fluctuation represent in relation to that citi one?

Answers:
93.5
93.5%
108.1
1.16
during 2015 , $ 82 million of provision recapture was recorded for purchased impaired loans compared to $ 91 million of provision recapture during 2014 . charge-offs ( which were specifically for commercial loans greater than a defined threshold ) during 2015 were $ 12 million compared to $ 42 million during 2014 . at december 31 , 2015 and december 31 , 2014 , the alll on total purchased impaired loans was $ .3 billion and $ .9 billion , respectively . the decline in alll was primarily due to the change in our derecognition policy . for purchased impaired loan pools where an allowance has been recognized , subsequent increases in the net present value of cash flows will result in a provision recapture of any previously recorded alll to the extent applicable , and/or a reclassification from non-accretable difference to accretable yield , which will be recognized prospectively . individual loan transactions where final dispositions have occurred ( as noted above ) result in removal of the loans from their applicable pools for cash flow estimation purposes . the cash flow re- estimation process is completed quarterly to evaluate the appropriateness of the alll associated with the purchased impaired loans . activity for the accretable yield during 2015 and 2014 follows : table 66 : purchased impaired loans 2013 accretable yield .

2015: january 1: 1558
accretion ( including excess cash recoveries ): -466
net reclassifications to accretable from non-accretable: 226
disposals: -68
december 31: 1250
2014: january 1: 2055
accretion ( including excess cash recoveries ): -587
net reclassifications to accretable from non-accretable: 208
disposals: -118
december 31: 1558

note 5 allowances for loan and lease losses and unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit allowance for loan and lease losses we maintain the alll at levels that we believe to be appropriate to absorb estimated probable credit losses incurred in the portfolios as of the balance sheet date . we use the two main portfolio segments 2013 commercial lending and consumer lending 2013 and develop and document the alll under separate methodologies for each of these segments as discussed in note 1 accounting policies . a rollforward of the alll and associated loan data follows . the pnc financial services group , inc . 2013 form 10-k 141 .

Questions:
what was the net change on all total purchased impaired loans between 12/31/15 and 12/31/14?
what was the total provision recapture for purchased impaired loans between 2014 and 2015?
so what was the average during this time?

Answers:
-.6
173.0
86.5