sharick008/convfinqa huggingface dataset:
performance graph the performance graph below shows the five-year cumulative total stockholder return on applied common stock during the period from october 28 , 2012 through october 29 , 2017 . this is compared with the cumulative total return of the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index and the rdg semiconductor composite index over the same period . the comparison assumes $ 100 was invested on october 28 , 2012 in applied common stock and in each of the foregoing indices and assumes reinvestment of dividends , if any . dollar amounts in the graph are rounded to the nearest whole dollar . the performance shown in the graph represents past performance and should not be considered an indication of future performance . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among applied materials , inc. , the s&p 500 index and the rdg semiconductor composite index *assumes $ 100 invested on 10/28/12 in stock or 10/31/12 in index , including reinvestment of dividends . indexes calculated on month-end basis . copyright a9 2017 standard & poor 2019s , a division of s&p global . all rights reserved. .

10/28/2012: applied materials: 100
s&p 500 index: 100
rdg semiconductor composite index: 100
10/27/2013: applied materials: 171.03
s&p 500 index: 127.18
rdg semiconductor composite index: 131.94
10/26/2014: applied materials: 207.01
s&p 500 index: 149.14
rdg semiconductor composite index: 167.25
10/25/2015: applied materials: 165.34
s&p 500 index: 156.89
rdg semiconductor composite index: 160.8
10/30/2016: applied materials: 293.64
s&p 500 index: 163.97
rdg semiconductor composite index: 193.36
10/29/2017: applied materials: 586.91
s&p 500 index: 202.72
rdg semiconductor composite index: 288.96

dividends during each of fiscal 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , applied 2019s board of directors declared four quarterly cash dividends in the amount of $ 0.10 per share . applied currently anticipates that cash dividends will continue to be paid on a quarterly basis , although the declaration of any future cash dividend is at the discretion of the board of directors and will depend on applied 2019s financial condition , results of operations , capital requirements , business conditions and other factors , as well as a determination by the board of directors that cash dividends are in the best interests of applied 2019s stockholders . 10/28/12 10/27/13 10/26/14 10/25/15 10/30/16 10/29/17 applied materials , inc . s&p 500 rdg semiconductor composite .

Questions:
what was the value of the s&p 500 in 2015?
what is that less 100?
what is that value divided by 100?

Answers:
156.89
56.89
56.9%
performance graph the performance graph below shows the five-year cumulative total stockholder return on applied common stock during the period from october 25 , 2009 through october 26 , 2014 . this is compared with the cumulative total return of the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index and the rdg semiconductor composite index over the same period . the comparison assumes $ 100 was invested on october 25 , 2009 in applied common stock and in each of the foregoing indices and assumes reinvestment of dividends , if any . dollar amounts in the graph are rounded to the nearest whole dollar . the performance shown in the graph represents past performance and should not be considered an indication of future performance . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among applied materials , inc. , the s&p 500 index 201cs&p 201d is a registered trademark of standard & poor 2019s financial services llc , a subsidiary of the mcgraw-hill companies , inc. .

10/25/2009: applied materials: 100
s&p 500 index: 100
rdg semiconductor composite index: 100
10/31/2010: applied materials: 97.43
s&p 500 index: 116.52
rdg semiconductor composite index: 121
10/30/2011: applied materials: 101.85
s&p 500 index: 125.94
rdg semiconductor composite index: 132.42
10/28/2012: applied materials: 88.54
s&p 500 index: 145.09
rdg semiconductor composite index: 124.95
10/27/2013: applied materials: 151.43
s&p 500 index: 184.52
rdg semiconductor composite index: 163.2
10/26/2014: applied materials: 183.29
s&p 500 index: 216.39
rdg semiconductor composite index: 207.93

dividends during fiscal 2014 , applied 2019s board of directors declared four quarterly cash dividends of $ 0.10 per share each . during fiscal 2013 , applied 2019s board of directors declared three quarterly cash dividends of $ 0.10 per share each and one quarterly cash dividend of $ 0.09 per share . during fiscal 2012 , applied 2019s board of directors declared three quarterly cash dividends of $ 0.09 per share each and one quarterly cash dividend of $ 0.08 . dividends declared during fiscal 2014 , 2013 and 2012 totaled $ 487 million , $ 469 million and $ 438 million , respectively . applied currently anticipates that it will continue to pay cash dividends on a quarterly basis in the future , although the declaration and amount of any future cash dividends are at the discretion of the board of directors and will depend on applied 2019s financial condition , results of operations , capital requirements , business conditions and other factors , as well as a determination that cash dividends are in the best interests of applied 2019s stockholders . $ 100 invested on 10/25/09 in stock or 10/31/09 in index , including reinvestment of dividends . indexes calculated on month-end basis . and the rdg semiconductor composite index 183145 97 102 121 132 10/25/09 10/31/10 10/30/11 10/28/12 10/27/13 10/26/14 applied materials , inc . s&p 500 rdg semiconductor composite .

Questions:
what is the value of an investment in applied materials	 in 2012?
what is the net change?
what percentage change does this represent?

Answers:
88.54
-11.46
11.5%
federal realty investment trust schedule iii summary of real estate and accumulated depreciation 2014continued three years ended december 31 , 2006 reconciliation of accumulated depreciation and amortization ( in thousands ) .

$ 514177: additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense: 89564
deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property: -12807
balance december 31 2004: 595338
balance december 31 2005: 663750
balance december 31 2006: 740507

.

Questions:
what were the deductions during 2004?
what were the deductions during 2005?
what is the sum of those deductions?
what were the deductions during 2006?
what is the total sum of deductions for the 3 years?
what was the total sum divided by 3?

Answers:
1390
15244
16634
12807
29441
9813.66
through the certegy merger , the company has an obligation to service $ 200 million ( aggregate principal amount ) of unsecured 4.75% ( 4.75 % ) fixed-rate notes due in 2008 . the notes were recorded in purchase accounting at a discount of $ 5.7 million , which is being amortized over the term of the notes . the notes accrue interest at a rate of 4.75% ( 4.75 % ) per year , payable semi-annually in arrears on each march 15 and september 15 . on april 11 , 2005 , fis entered into interest rate swap agreements which have effectively fixed the interest rate at approximately 5.4% ( 5.4 % ) through april 2008 on $ 350 million of the term loan facilities ( or its replacement debt ) and at approximately 5.2% ( 5.2 % ) through april 2007 on an additional $ 350 million of the term loan . the company has designated these interest rate swaps as cash flow hedges in accordance with sfas no . 133 . the estimated fair value of the cash flow hedges results in an asset to the company of $ 4.9 million and $ 5.2 million , as of december 31 , 2006 and december 31 , 2005 , respectively , which is included in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets in other noncurrent assets and as a component of accumulated other comprehensive earnings , net of deferred taxes . a portion of the amount included in accumulated other comprehensive earnings is reclassified into interest expense as a yield adjustment as interest payments are made on the term loan facilities . the company 2019s existing cash flow hedges are highly effective and there is no current impact on earnings due to hedge ineffectiveness . it is the policy of the company to execute such instruments with credit-worthy banks and not to enter into derivative financial instruments for speculative purposes . principal maturities at december 31 , 2006 ( and at december 31 , 2006 after giving effect to the debt refinancing completed on january 18 , 2007 ) for the next five years and thereafter are as follows ( in thousands ) : december 31 , january 18 , 2007 refinancing .

december 31 2006: 2007: 61661
2008: 257541
2009: 68129
2010: 33586
2011: 941875
thereafter: 1646709
total: 3009501
january 18 2007 refinancing: 2007: 96161
2008: 282041
2009: 145129
2010: 215586
2011: 165455
thereafter: 2105129
total: 3009501

fidelity national information services , inc . and subsidiaries and affiliates consolidated and combined financial statements notes to consolidated and combined financial statements 2014 ( continued ) .

Questions:
what was the change in the total of principal maturities due in 2007 due to the debt refinancing completed on january of that year?
and what was the amount of unsecured 4.75% ( 4.75 % ) fixed-rate notes due in the next year, that the company was obligated to service?
what is, then, the annual interest expense on those notes?

Answers:
-34500
200
9.5
entergy louisiana , llc management's financial discussion and analysis net revenue 2008 compared to 2007 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2008 to 2007 . amount ( in millions ) .

amount ( in millions ): 2007 net revenue: 991.1
retail electric price: -17.1
purchased power capacity: -12
net wholesale revenue: -7.4
other: 4.6
2008 net revenue: 959.2

the retail electric price variance is primarily due to the cessation of the interim storm recovery through the formula rate plan upon the act 55 financing of storm costs and a credit passed on to customers as a result of the act 55 storm cost financing , partially offset by increases in the formula rate plan effective october 2007 . refer to "hurricane rita and hurricane katrina" and "state and local rate regulation" below for a discussion of the interim recovery of storm costs , the act 55 storm cost financing , and the formula rate plan filing . the purchased power capacity variance is due to the amortization of deferred capacity costs effective september 2007 as a result of the formula rate plan filing in may 2007 . purchased power capacity costs are offset in base revenues due to a base rate increase implemented to recover incremental deferred and ongoing purchased power capacity charges . see "state and local rate regulation" below for a discussion of the formula rate plan filing . the net wholesale revenue variance is primarily due to provisions recorded for potential rate refunds related to the treatment of interruptible load in pricing entergy system affiliate sales . gross operating revenue and , fuel and purchased power expenses gross operating revenues increased primarily due to an increase of $ 364.7 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due to higher fuel rates offset by decreased usage . the increase was partially offset by a decrease of $ 56.8 million in gross wholesale revenue due to a decrease in system agreement rough production cost equalization credits . fuel and purchased power expenses increased primarily due to increases in the average market prices of natural gas and purchased power , partially offset by a decrease in the recovery from customers of deferred fuel costs. .

Questions:
what was net revenue in 2008?
what was it in 2007?
what was the difference from 2007 to 2008?
what is the value of purchased power capacity over that difference in revenue?

Answers:
959.2
991.1
-31.9
37.6%
projected payments relating to these liabilities for the next five years ending december 31 , 2012 and the period from 2013 to 2017 are as follows ( in thousands ) : .

$ 980: 2009: 1185
2010: 978
2011: 1022
2012: 1425
2013 - 2017: 8147

( 18 ) concentration of risk the company generates a significant amount of revenue from large customers , however , no customers accounted for more than 10% ( 10 % ) of total revenue or total segment revenue in the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 and 2005 . financial instruments that potentially subject the company to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash equivalents and trade receivables . the company places its cash equivalents with high credit quality financial institutions and , by policy , limits the amount of credit exposure with any one financial institution . concentrations of credit risk with respect to trade receivables are limited because a large number of geographically diverse customers make up the company 2019s customer base , thus spreading the trade receivables credit risk . the company controls credit risk through monitoring procedures . ( 19 ) segment information upon completion of the certegy merger , the company implemented a new organizational structure , which resulted in a new operating segment structure beginning with the reporting of first quarter 2006 results . effective as of february 1 , 2006 , the company 2019s operating segments are tps and lps . this structure reflects how the businesses are operated and managed . the primary components of the tps segment , which includes certegy 2019s card and check services , the financial institution processing component of the former financial institution software and services segment of fis and the operations acquired from efunds , are enterprise solutions , integrated financial solutions and international businesses . the primary components of the lps segment are mortgage information services businesses , which includes the mortgage lender processing component of the former financial institution software and services segment of fis , and the former lender services , default management , and information services segments of fis . fidelity national information services , inc . and subsidiaries and affiliates notes to consolidated and combined financial statements 2014 ( continued ) .

Questions:
what was the value of projected payments in 2010?
what was the value in 2009?
what is the net difference?
what was the 2009 value?
what was the percent change?

Answers:
978
1185
-207
1185
-17.5%
stock performance graph this performance graph shall not be deemed 201cfiled 201d for purposes of section 18 of the exchange act , or incorporated by reference into any filing of quintiles ims holdings , inc . under the exchange act or under the securities act , except as shall be expressly set forth by specific reference in such filing . the following graph shows a comparison from may 9 , 2013 ( the date our common stock commenced trading on the nyse ) through december 31 , 2016 of the cumulative total return for our common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index ( 201cs&p 500 201d ) and a select peer group . the peer group consists of cerner corporation , charles river laboratories , inc. , dun & bradstreet corporation , equifax inc. , icon plc , ihs markit ltd. , inc research holdings , laboratory corporation of america holdings , nielsen n.v. , parexel international corporation , inc. , pra health sciences , inc. , thomson reuters corporation and verisk analytics , inc . the companies in our peer group are publicly traded information services , information technology or contract research companies , and thus share similar business model characteristics to quintilesims , or provide services to similar customers as quintilesims . many of these companies are also used by our compensation committee for purposes of compensation benchmarking . the graph assumes that $ 100 was invested in quintilesims , the s&p 500 and the peer group as of the close of market on may 9 , 2013 , assumes the reinvestments of dividends , if any . the s&p 500 and our peer group are included for comparative purposes only . they do not necessarily reflect management 2019s opinion that the s&p 500 and our peer group are an appropriate measure of the relative performance of the stock involved , and they are not intended to forecast or be indicative of possible future performance of our common stock . s&p 500 quintilesims peer group .

5/9/2013: q: 100
peer group: 100
s&p 500: 100
12/31/2013: q: 110
peer group: 116
s&p 500: 114
12/31/2014: q: 140
peer group: 143
s&p 500: 127
12/31/2015: q: 163
peer group: 151
s&p 500: 126
12/31/2016: q: 181
peer group: 143
s&p 500: 138

item 6 . selected financial data we have derived the following consolidated statements of income data for 2016 , 2015 and 2014 and consolidated balance sheet data as of december 31 , 2016 and 2015 from our audited consolidated financial .

Questions:
what was the value of q at the end of 2014?
what was the net change assuming a $100 initial investment?
what is the percent change?

Answers:
140
40
40%
apple inc . | 2018 form 10-k | 20 company stock performance the following graph shows a comparison of cumulative total shareholder return , calculated on a dividend-reinvested basis , for the company , the s&p 500 index , the s&p information technology index and the dow jones u.s . technology supersector index for the five years ended september 29 , 2018 . the graph assumes $ 100 was invested in each of the company 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index , the s&p information technology index and the dow jones u.s . technology supersector index as of the market close on september 27 , 2013 . note that historic stock price performance is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance . * $ 100 invested on september 27 , 2013 in stock or index , including reinvestment of dividends . data points are the last day of each fiscal year for the company 2019s common stock and september 30th for indexes . copyright a9 2018 standard & poor 2019s , a division of s&p global . all rights reserved . copyright a9 2018 s&p dow jones indices llc , a division of s&p global . all rights reserved . september september september september september september .

september2013: apple inc .: 100
s&p 500 index: 100
s&p information technology index: 100
dow jones u.s . technology supersector index: 100
september2014: apple inc .: 149
s&p 500 index: 120
s&p information technology index: 129
dow jones u.s . technology supersector index: 130
september2015: apple inc .: 173
s&p 500 index: 119
s&p information technology index: 132
dow jones u.s . technology supersector index: 130
september2016: apple inc .: 174
s&p 500 index: 137
s&p information technology index: 162
dow jones u.s . technology supersector index: 159
september2017: apple inc .: 242
s&p 500 index: 163
s&p information technology index: 209
dow jones u.s . technology supersector index: 203
september2018: apple inc .: 359
s&p 500 index: 192
s&p information technology index: 275
dow jones u.s . technology supersector index: 266

.

Questions:
what was the change in the value of apple inc stock in 2018 less the initial $100 investment?
what was the initial investment?
what is the percent change?

Answers:
259
100
259%
jpmorgan chase & co./2015 annual report 67 five-year stock performance the following table and graph compare the five-year cumulative total return for jpmorgan chase & co . ( 201cjpmorgan chase 201d or the 201cfirm 201d ) common stock with the cumulative return of the s&p 500 index , the kbw bank index and the s&p financial index . the s&p 500 index is a commonly referenced united states of america ( 201cu.s . 201d ) equity benchmark consisting of leading companies from different economic sectors . the kbw bank index seeks to reflect the performance of banks and thrifts that are publicly traded in the u.s . and is composed of 24 leading national money center and regional banks and thrifts . the s&p financial index is an index of 87 financial companies , all of which are components of the s&p 500 . the firm is a component of all three industry indices . the following table and graph assume simultaneous investments of $ 100 on december 31 , 2010 , in jpmorgan chase common stock and in each of the above indices . the comparison assumes that all dividends are reinvested . december 31 , ( in dollars ) 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 .

2010: jpmorgan chase: 100
kbw bank index: 100
s&p financial index: 100
s&p 500 index: 100
2011: jpmorgan chase: 80.03
kbw bank index: 76.82
s&p financial index: 82.94
s&p 500 index: 102.11
2012: jpmorgan chase: 108.98
kbw bank index: 102.19
s&p financial index: 106.78
s&p 500 index: 118.44
2013: jpmorgan chase: 148.98
kbw bank index: 140.77
s&p financial index: 144.79
s&p 500 index: 156.78
2014: jpmorgan chase: 163.71
kbw bank index: 153.96
s&p financial index: 166.76
s&p 500 index: 178.22
2015: jpmorgan chase: 177.4
kbw bank index: 154.71
s&p financial index: 164.15
s&p 500 index: 180.67

december 31 , ( in dollars ) .

Questions:
what was the price for the s&p financial index in 2015?
what was the change in the 2015 price and the initial $100 investment?
what is the percent change?

Answers:
164.15
64.15
64.15%
stockholder return performance graph the following graph compares the cumulative 5-year total stockholder return on our common stock relative to the cumulative total return of the nasdaq composite index and the s&p 400 information technology index . the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock and in each index on december 31 , 2011 ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 and tracks it each year thereafter on the last day of our fiscal year through december 31 , 2016 and , for each index , on the last day of the calendar year . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among cadence design systems , inc. , the nasdaq composite index , and s&p 400 information technology cadence design systems , inc . nasdaq composite s&p 400 information technology 12/31/1612/28/13 1/2/1612/31/11 1/3/1512/29/12 *$ 100 invested on 12/31/11 in stock or index , including reinvestment of dividends . indexes calculated on month-end basis . copyright a9 2017 standard & poor 2019s , a division of s&p global . all rights reserved. .

12/31/2011: cadence design systems inc .: 100
nasdaq composite: 100
s&p 400 information technology: 100
12/29/2012: cadence design systems inc .: 129.23
nasdaq composite: 116.41
s&p 400 information technology: 118.41
12/28/2013: cadence design systems inc .: 133.94
nasdaq composite: 165.47
s&p 400 information technology: 165.38
1/3/2015: cadence design systems inc .: 181.06
nasdaq composite: 188.69
s&p 400 information technology: 170.5
1/2/2016: cadence design systems inc .: 200.1
nasdaq composite: 200.32
s&p 400 information technology: 178.74
12/31/2016: cadence design systems inc .: 242.5
nasdaq composite: 216.54
s&p 400 information technology: 219.65

the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance. .

Questions:
what was the value of cadence design systems inc . in 2016?
what was, then, the change in its value, considering 2016 and the original amount invested in it in 2011?
and how much does this change represent in relation to this original amount, in percentage?

Answers:
242.50
142.50
142.50%