sharick008/convfinqa huggingface dataset:
the company granted 1020 performance shares . the vesting of these shares is contingent on meeting stated goals over a performance period . beginning with restricted stock grants in september 2010 , dividends are accrued on restricted class a common stock and restricted stock units and are paid once the restricted stock vests . the following table summarizes restricted stock and performance shares activity for 2010 : number of shares weighted average grant date fair value .

number of shares: outstanding at december 31 2009: 116677
granted: 134245
vested: -34630
cancelled: -19830
outstanding at december 31 2010: 196462
weighted average grant date fair value: outstanding at december 31 2009: 280
granted: 275
vested: 257
cancelled: 260
outstanding at december 31 2010: 283

the total fair value of restricted stock that vested during the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , was $ 10.3 million , $ 6.2 million and $ 2.5 million , respectively . eligible employees may acquire shares of cme group 2019s class a common stock using after-tax payroll deductions made during consecutive offering periods of approximately six months in duration . shares are purchased at the end of each offering period at a price of 90% ( 90 % ) of the closing price of the class a common stock as reported on the nasdaq . compensation expense is recognized on the dates of purchase for the discount from the closing price . in 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , a total of 4371 , 4402 and 5600 shares , respectively , of class a common stock were issued to participating employees . these shares are subject to a six-month holding period . annual expense of $ 0.1 million for the purchase discount was recognized in 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively . non-executive directors receive an annual award of class a common stock with a value equal to $ 75000 . non-executive directors may also elect to receive some or all of the cash portion of their annual stipend , up to $ 25000 , in shares of stock based on the closing price at the date of distribution . as a result , 7470 , 11674 and 5509 shares of class a common stock were issued to non-executive directors during 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively . these shares are not subject to any vesting restrictions . expense of $ 2.4 million , $ 2.5 million and $ 2.4 million related to these stock-based payments was recognized for the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively. .

Questions:
what was the total fair value of restricted stock that vested in 2010, in dollars?
and what was the total number of shares in that process?
what was the number of shares that vested based on the average grant fair value in 2010?
and what is, then, the difference between the number of actual shares that vested in that year and the one of shares that vested based on the average grant fair value?

Answers:
10300000
40077
34630
5447
28 , 35 , or 90 days . the funds associated with failed auctions will not be accessible until a successful auction occurs or a buyer is found outside of the auction process . based on broker- dealer valuation models and an analysis of other-than-temporary impairment factors , auction rate securities with an original par value of approximately $ 34 million were written-down to an estimated fair value of $ 16 million as of december 31 , 2007 . this write-down resulted in an 201cother-than-temporary 201d impairment charge of approximately $ 8 million ( pre-tax ) included in net income and a temporary impairment charge of $ 10 million ( pre-tax ) reflected as an unrealized loss within other comprehensive income for 2007 . as of december 31 , 2007 , these investments in auction rate securities have been in a loss position for less than six months . these auction rate securities are classified as non-current marketable securities as of december 31 , 2007 as indicated in the preceding table . 3m reviews impairments associated with the above in accordance with emerging issues task force ( eitf ) 03-1 and fsp sfas 115-1 and 124-1 , 201cthe meaning of other-than-temporary-impairment and its application to certain investments , 201d to determine the classification of the impairment as 201ctemporary 201d or 201cother-than-temporary . 201d a temporary impairment charge results in an unrealized loss being recorded in the other comprehensive income component of stockholders 2019 equity . such an unrealized loss does not reduce net income for the applicable accounting period because the loss is not viewed as other-than-temporary . the company believes that a portion of the impairment of its auction rate securities investments is temporary and a portion is other-than-temporary . the factors evaluated to differentiate between temporary and other-than-temporary include the projected future cash flows , credit ratings actions , and assessment of the credit quality of the underlying collateral . the balance at december 31 , 2007 for marketable securities and short-term investments by contractual maturity are shown below . actual maturities may differ from contractual maturities because the issuers of the securities may have the right to prepay obligations without prepayment penalties . dec . 31 , ( millions ) 2007 .

dec . 31 2007: due in one year or less: 231
due after one year through three years: 545
due after three years through five years: 221
due after five years: 62
total marketable securities: 1059

predetermined intervals , usually every 7 .

Questions:
as of december 31, 2007, what was the impact of the adjustement on the auction rate securities?
and what is this impact as a portion of those original securities?
in that same year, what percentage did the securities due in one year or less represent in relation to the total?

Answers:
18
52.9%
21.8%
s c h e d u l e i v ace limited and subsidiaries s u p p l e m e n t a l i n f o r m a t i o n c o n c e r n i n g r e i n s u r a n c e premiums earned for the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 , and 2008 ( in millions of u.s . dollars , except for percentages ) direct amount ceded to companies assumed from other companies net amount percentage of amount assumed to .

directamount: 2010: 15780
2009: 15415
2008: 16087
ceded to other companies: 2010: 5792
2009: 5943
2008: 6144
assumed from other companies: 2010: 3516
2009: 3768
2008: 3260
net amount: 2010: 13504
2009: 13240
2008: 13203
percentage of amount assumed to net: 2010: -26
2009: -28
2008: -25

.

Questions:
what is the direct amount for 2010?
what about in 2009?
what is the net change in direct amount from 2009 to 2010?
what is the direct amount for 2009?
what growth rate does this represent?

Answers:
15780
15415
365
15415
2.4%
the graph below matches cadence design systems , inc . 2019s cumulative 5-year total shareholder return on common stock with the cumulative total returns of the s&p 500 index , the s&p information technology index , and the nasdaq composite index . the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock , and in each index ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 on december 28 , 2002 and tracks it through december 29 , 2007 . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among cadence design systems , inc. , the s&p 500 index , the nasdaq composite index and the s&p information technology index 12/29/0712/30/0612/31/051/1/051/3/0412/28/02 cadence design systems , inc . nasdaq composite s & p information technology s & p 500 * $ 100 invested on 12/28/02 in stock or on 12/31/02 in index-including reinvestment of dividends . indexes calculated on month-end basis . copyright b7 2007 , standard & poor 2019s , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies , inc . all rights reserved . www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm .

12/28/02: cadence design systems inc .: 100
s & p 500: 100
nasdaq composite: 100
s & p information technology: 100
1/3/04: cadence design systems inc .: 149.92
s & p 500: 128.68
nasdaq composite: 149.75
s & p information technology: 147.23
1/1/05: cadence design systems inc .: 113.38
s & p 500: 142.69
nasdaq composite: 164.64
s & p information technology: 150.99
12/31/05: cadence design systems inc .: 138.92
s & p 500: 149.7
nasdaq composite: 168.6
s & p information technology: 152.49
12/30/06: cadence design systems inc .: 147.04
s & p 500: 173.34
nasdaq composite: 187.83
s & p information technology: 165.32
12/29/07: cadence design systems inc .: 139.82
s & p 500: 182.87
nasdaq composite: 205.22
s & p information technology: 192.28

the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance .

Questions:
what was the net change in value of cadence design from 2002 to 2007?
what is the percent change?
what is the value of the s&p 500 in 2007?
what was the net change in difference from 2002 to 2007?
what is the percent change?
what is the difference of the 2 stock price percent changes?

Answers:
39.82
39.82%
182.87
82.87
82.87%
-43.05%
shareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the sec , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates such information by reference into such filing . the following graph shows a five year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 index , and the dow jones transportation average . the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2008 in the standard & poor 2019s 500 index , the dow jones transportation average , and our class b common stock. .

12/31/2008: united parcel service inc .: 100
standard & poor 2019s 500 index: 100
dow jones transportation average: 100
12/31/2009: united parcel service inc .: 107.75
standard & poor 2019s 500 index: 126.45
dow jones transportation average: 118.59
12/31/2010: united parcel service inc .: 140.39
standard & poor 2019s 500 index: 145.49
dow jones transportation average: 150.3
12/31/2011: united parcel service inc .: 145.84
standard & poor 2019s 500 index: 148.55
dow jones transportation average: 150.31
12/31/2012: united parcel service inc .: 151.44
standard & poor 2019s 500 index: 172.3
dow jones transportation average: 161.56
12/31/2013: united parcel service inc .: 221.91
standard & poor 2019s 500 index: 228.09
dow jones transportation average: 228.42

.

Questions:
what is the value of united parcel service inc. in 2013 less a $100 initial investment?
what is that value over 100?

Answers:
121.91
121.91%
table of contents the following table discloses purchases of shares of our common stock made by us or on our behalf during the fourth quarter of 2017 . period total number of shares purchased average price paid per share total number of shares not purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs ( a ) total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs approximate dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs ( b ) .

total numberof sharespurchased: october 2017: 515762
november 2017: 2186889
december 2017: 2330263
total: 5032914
averageprice paidper share: october 2017: 77.15
november 2017: 81.21
december 2017: 87.76
total: 83.83
total number ofshares notpurchased as part ofpublicly announcedplans or programs ( a ): october 2017: 292145
november 2017: 216415
december 2017: 798
total: 509358
total number ofshares purchased aspart of publiclyannounced plans orprograms: october 2017: 223617
november 2017: 1970474
december 2017: 2329465
total: 4523556
approximate dollarvalue of shares thatmay yet be purchasedunder the plans orprograms ( b ): october 2017: 1.6
november 2017: 1.4
december 2017: 1.2
total: 1.2

( a ) the shares reported in this column represent purchases settled in the fourth quarter of 2017 relating to ( i ) our purchases of shares in open-market transactions to meet our obligations under stock-based compensation plans , and ( ii ) our purchases of shares from our employees and non-employee directors in connection with the exercise of stock options , the vesting of restricted stock , and other stock compensation transactions in accordance with the terms of our stock-based compensation plans . ( b ) on september 21 , 2016 , we announced that our board of directors authorized our purchase of up to $ 2.5 billion of our outstanding common stock ( the 2016 program ) with no expiration date . as of december 31 , 2017 , we had $ 1.2 billion remaining available for purchase under the 2016 program . on january 23 , 2018 , we announced that our board of directors authorized our purchase of up to an additional $ 2.5 billion of our outstanding common stock with no expiration date. .

Questions:
what was the share price in november 2017?
what was it in october 2017?
what is the net change?
what was the october price?
what is the percent change?

Answers:
81.21
77.15
4.06
77.15
0.053
comparison of cumulative return among lkq corporation , the nasdaq stock market ( u.s. ) index and the peer group .

12/31/2007: lkq corporation: 100
nasdaq stock market ( u.s. ) index: 100
peer group: 100
12/31/2008: lkq corporation: 55
nasdaq stock market ( u.s. ) index: 59
peer group: 83
12/31/2009: lkq corporation: 93
nasdaq stock market ( u.s. ) index: 86
peer group: 100
12/31/2010: lkq corporation: 108
nasdaq stock market ( u.s. ) index: 100
peer group: 139
12/31/2011: lkq corporation: 143
nasdaq stock market ( u.s. ) index: 98
peer group: 187
12/31/2012: lkq corporation: 201
nasdaq stock market ( u.s. ) index: 114
peer group: 210

this stock performance information is "furnished" and shall not be deemed to be "soliciting material" or subject to rule 14a , shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of section 18 of the securities exchange act of 1934 or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section , and shall not be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the securities act of 1933 or the securities exchange act of 1934 , whether made before or after the date of this report and irrespective of any general incorporation by reference language in any such filing , except to the extent that it specifically incorporates the information by reference . information about our common stock that may be issued under our equity compensation plans as of december 31 , 2012 included in part iii , item 12 of this annual report on form 10-k is incorporated herein by reference. .

Questions:
what was the value of lkq corp in 2012?
what was the value in 2007?
what is the change in value?
what is the percent change?

Answers:
201
100
101
101%
stock total return performance the following graph compares our total return to stockholders with the returns of the standard & poor 2019s composite 500 index ( 201cs&p 500 201d ) and the dow jones us select health care providers index ( 201cpeer group 201d ) for the five years ended december 31 , 2018 . the graph assumes an investment of $ 100 in each of our common stock , the s&p 500 , and the peer group on december 31 , 2013 , and that dividends were reinvested when paid. .

12/31/2013: hum: 100
s&p 500: 100
peer group: 100
12/31/2014: hum: 140
s&p 500: 114
peer group: 128
12/31/2015: hum: 176
s&p 500: 115
peer group: 135
12/31/2016: hum: 202
s&p 500: 129
peer group: 137
12/31/2017: hum: 247
s&p 500: 157
peer group: 173
12/31/2018: hum: 287
s&p 500: 150
peer group: 191

the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance. .

Questions:
what was the highest change in the performance price for the first year?
and what was the lowest?

Answers:
40%
14%
15 . leases in january 1996 , the company entered into a lease agreement with an unrelated third party for a new corporate office facility , which the company occupied in february 1997 . in may 2004 , the company entered into the first amendment to this lease agreement , effective january 1 , 2004 . the lease was extended from an original period of 10 years , with an option for five additional years , to a period of 18 years from the inception date , with an option for five additional years . the company incurred lease rental expense related to this facility of $ 1.3 million in 2008 , 2007 and 2006 . the future minimum lease payments are $ 1.4 million per annum from january 1 , 2009 to december 31 , 2014 . the future minimum lease payments from january 1 , 2015 through december 31 , 2019 will be determined based on prevailing market rental rates at the time of the extension , if elected . the amended lease also provided for the lessor to reimburse the company for up to $ 550000 in building refurbishments completed through march 31 , 2006 . these amounts have been recorded as a reduction of lease expense over the remaining term of the lease . the company has also entered into various noncancellable operating leases for equipment and office space . office space lease expense totaled $ 9.3 million , $ 6.3 million and $ 4.7 million for the years ended december 31 , 2008 , 2007 and 2006 , respectively . future minimum lease payments under noncancellable operating leases for office space in effect at december 31 , 2008 are $ 8.8 million in 2009 , $ 6.6 million in 2010 , $ 3.0 million in 2011 , $ 1.8 million in 2012 and $ 1.1 million in 2013 . 16 . royalty agreements the company has entered into various renewable , nonexclusive license agreements under which the company has been granted access to the licensor 2019s technology and the right to sell the technology in the company 2019s product line . royalties are payable to developers of the software at various rates and amounts , which generally are based upon unit sales or revenue . royalty fees are reported in cost of goods sold and were $ 6.3 million , $ 5.2 million and $ 3.9 million for the years ended december 31 , 2008 , 2007 and 2006 , respectively . 17 . geographic information revenue to external customers is attributed to individual countries based upon the location of the customer . revenue by geographic area is as follows: .

year ended december 31 , 2008: united states: 151688
germany: 68390
japan: 66960
canada: 8033
other european: 127246
other international: 56022
total revenue: 478339
year ended december 31 , 2007: united states: 131777
germany: 50973
japan: 50896
canada: 4809
other european: 108971
other international: 37914
total revenue: 385340
year ended december 31 , 2006: united states: 94282
germany: 34567
japan: 35391
canada: 4255
other european: 70184
other international: 24961
total revenue: 263640

.

Questions:
what were royalty fees for 2007 and 2008?
what were they including 2006?

Answers:
11.5
15.4
asset category target allocation total quoted prices in active markets for identical assets ( level 1 ) significant observable inputs ( level 2 ) significant unobservable inputs .

level 3: balance as of january 1 2018: 278
actual return on assets: -23
purchases issuances and settlements net: -25
balance as of december 31 2018: 230

balance as of january 1 , 2017 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 140 actual return on assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 purchases , issuances and settlements , net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 136 balance as of december 31 , 2017 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 278 the company 2019s postretirement benefit plans have different levels of funded status and the assets are held under various trusts . the investments and risk mitigation strategies for the plans are tailored specifically for each trust . in setting new strategic asset mixes , consideration is given to the likelihood that the selected asset allocation will effectively fund the projected plan liabilities and meet the risk tolerance criteria of the company . the company periodically updates the long-term , strategic asset allocations for these plans through asset liability studies and uses various analytics to determine the optimal asset allocation . considerations include plan liability characteristics , liquidity needs , funding requirements , expected rates of return and the distribution of returns . in 2012 , the company implemented a de-risking strategy for the american water pension plan after conducting an asset-liability study to reduce the volatility of the funded status of the plan . as part of the de-risking strategy , the company revised the asset allocations to increase the matching characteristics of fixed- income assets relative to liabilities . the fixed income portion of the portfolio was designed to match the bond- .

Questions:
what was the actual return on assets times -1?
what was the value of purchases issuances and settlements net
which value is greater?

Answers:
-23
-25
yes
stock performance graph the following graph sets forth the cumulative total shareholder return on our series a common stock , series b common stock and series c common stock as compared with the cumulative total return of the companies listed in the standard and poor 2019s 500 stock index ( 201cs&p 500 index 201d ) and a peer group of companies comprised of cbs corporation class b common stock , scripps network interactive , inc . ( acquired by the company in march 2018 ) , time warner , inc . ( acquired by at&t inc . in june 2018 ) , twenty-first century fox , inc . class a common stock ( news corporation class a common stock prior to june 2013 ) , viacom , inc . class b common stock and the walt disney company . the graph assumes $ 100 originally invested on december 31 , 2013 in each of our series a common stock , series b common stock and series c common stock , the s&p 500 index , and the stock of our peer group companies , including reinvestment of dividends , for the years ended december 31 , 2014 , 2015 , 2016 , 2017 and 2018 . two peer companies , scripps networks interactive , inc . and time warner , inc. , were acquired in 2018 . the stock performance chart shows the peer group including scripps networks interactive , inc . and time warner , inc . and excluding both acquired companies for the entire five year period . december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 .

december 312013: disca: 100
discb: 100
disck: 100
s&p 500: 100
peer group incl . acquired companies: 100
peer group ex . acquired companies: 100
december 312014: disca: 74.58
discb: 80.56
disck: 80.42
s&p 500: 111.39
peer group incl . acquired companies: 116.64
peer group ex . acquired companies: 113.23
december 312015: disca: 57.76
discb: 58.82
disck: 60.15
s&p 500: 110.58
peer group incl . acquired companies: 114.02
peer group ex . acquired companies: 117.27
december 312016: disca: 59.34
discb: 63.44
disck: 63.87
s&p 500: 121.13
peer group incl . acquired companies: 127.96
peer group ex . acquired companies: 120.58
december 312017: disca: 48.45
discb: 53.97
disck: 50.49
s&p 500: 144.65
peer group incl . acquired companies: 132.23
peer group ex . acquired companies: 127.9
december 312018: disca: 53.56
discb: 72.9
disck: 55.04
s&p 500: 135.63
peer group incl . acquired companies: 105.8
peer group ex . acquired companies: 141.58

equity compensation plan information information regarding securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans will be set forth in our definitive proxy statement for our 2019 annual meeting of stockholders under the caption 201csecurities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans , 201d which is incorporated herein by reference. .

Questions:
what is the net change in value of an investment in disca from 2013 to 2018?
what cumulative return does this represent?

Answers:
-46.44
-46.44%