sharick008/convfinqa huggingface dataset:
american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements ( 3 ) consists of customer-related intangibles of approximately $ 75.0 million and network location intangibles of approximately $ 72.7 million . the customer-related intangibles and network location intangibles are being amortized on a straight-line basis over periods of up to 20 years . ( 4 ) the company expects that the goodwill recorded will be deductible for tax purposes . the goodwill was allocated to the company 2019s international rental and management segment . on september 12 , 2012 , the company entered into a definitive agreement to purchase up to approximately 348 additional communications sites from telef f3nica mexico . on september 27 , 2012 and december 14 , 2012 , the company completed the purchase of 279 and 2 communications sites , for an aggregate purchase price of $ 63.5 million ( including value added tax of $ 8.8 million ) . the following table summarizes the preliminary allocation of the aggregate purchase consideration paid and the amounts of assets acquired and liabilities assumed based upon their estimated fair value at the date of acquisition ( in thousands ) : preliminary purchase price allocation .

preliminary purchase price allocation: current assets: 8763
non-current assets: 2332
property and equipment: 26711
intangible assets ( 1 ): 21079
other non-current liabilities: -1349
fair value of net assets acquired: 57536
goodwill ( 2 ): 5998

( 1 ) consists of customer-related intangibles of approximately $ 10.7 million and network location intangibles of approximately $ 10.4 million . the customer-related intangibles and network location intangibles are being amortized on a straight-line basis over periods of up to 20 years . ( 2 ) the company expects that the goodwill recorded will be deductible for tax purposes . the goodwill was allocated to the company 2019s international rental and management segment . on november 16 , 2012 , the company entered into an agreement to purchase up to 198 additional communications sites from telef f3nica mexico . on december 14 , 2012 , the company completed the purchase of 188 communications sites , for an aggregate purchase price of $ 64.2 million ( including value added tax of $ 8.9 million ) . .

Questions:
what was the total amount of customer-related and network location intangibles?
for how many years will they be amortized?
so what will the annual amortization expense be?

Answers:
147.7
20
7.4
issuer purchases of equity securities the following table provides information about our repurchases of common stock during the three-month period ended december 31 , 2012 . period total number of shares purchased average price paid per total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced program ( a ) amount available for future share repurchases the program ( b ) ( in millions ) .

total number of shares purchased: october 1 2012 2013 october 28 2012: 842445
october 29 2012 2013 november 25 2012: 872973
november 26 2012 2013 december 31 2012: 1395288
total: 3110706
average price paid per share: october 1 2012 2013 october 28 2012: 93.38
october 29 2012 2013 november 25 2012: 90.86
november 26 2012 2013 december 31 2012: 92.02
total: 92.07
total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced program ( a ): october 1 2012 2013 october 28 2012: 842445
october 29 2012 2013 november 25 2012: 872973
november 26 2012 2013 december 31 2012: 1395288
total: 3110706
amount available for future share repurchases under the program ( b ) ( in millions ): october 1 2012 2013 october 28 2012: 2522
october 29 2012 2013 november 25 2012: 2443
november 26 2012 2013 december 31 2012: 2315
total: 2315

( a ) we repurchased a total of 3.1 million shares of our common stock for $ 286 million during the quarter ended december 31 , 2012 under a share repurchase program that we announced in october 2010 . ( b ) our board of directors has approved a share repurchase program for the repurchase of our common stock from time-to-time , authorizing an amount available for share repurchases of $ 6.5 billion . under the program , management has discretion to determine the dollar amount of shares to be repurchased and the timing of any repurchases in compliance with applicable law and regulation . the program does not have an expiration date . as of december 31 , 2012 , we had repurchased a total of 54.3 million shares under the program for $ 4.2 billion. .

Questions:
what portion of total stock purchases occurred in october 2012?
how many shares were purchased during november 26 - december 31, 2012?
at that average price?
what is the total value of these purchases?
what about in millions?

Answers:
27.1%
1395288
92.02
128394401.8
128.4
entergy texas , inc . and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis results of operations net income 2017 compared to 2016 net income decreased $ 31.4 million primarily due to lower net revenue , higher depreciation and amortization expenses , higher other operation and maintenance expenses , and higher taxes other than income taxes . 2016 compared to 2015 net income increased $ 37.9 million primarily due to lower other operation and maintenance expenses , the asset write-off of its receivable associated with the spindletop gas storage facility in 2015 , and higher net revenue . net revenue 2017 compared to 2016 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2017 to 2016 . amount ( in millions ) .

amount ( in millions ): 2016 net revenue: 644.2
net wholesale revenue: -35.1
purchased power capacity: -5.9
transmission revenue: -5.4
reserve equalization: 5.6
retail electric price: 19
other: 4.4
2017 net revenue: 626.8

the net wholesale revenue variance is primarily due to lower net capacity revenues resulting from the termination of the purchased power agreements between entergy louisiana and entergy texas in august 2016 . the purchased power capacity variance is primarily due to increased expenses due to capacity cost changes for ongoing purchased power capacity contracts . the transmission revenue variance is primarily due to a decrease in the amount of transmission revenues allocated by miso . the reserve equalization variance is due to the absence of reserve equalization expenses in 2017 as a result of entergy texas 2019s exit from the system agreement in august 2016 . see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the system agreement. .

Questions:
what was the net revenue for 2017?
and for 2016?
and the difference between the two years?
and the percentage change?

Answers:
626.8
644.2
-17.4
-2.7%
performance graph comparison of five-year cumulative total return the following graph and table compare the cumulative total return on citi 2019s common stock , which is listed on the nyse under the ticker symbol 201cc 201d and held by 81805 common stockholders of record as of january 31 , 2016 , with the cumulative total return of the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index over the five-year period through december 31 , 2015 . the graph and table assume that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2010 in citi 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index , and that all dividends were reinvested . comparison of five-year cumulative total return for the years ended date citi s&p 500 financials .

citi: 31-dec-2010: 100
30-dec-2011: 55.67
31-dec-2012: 83.81
31-dec-2013: 110.49
31-dec-2014: 114.83
31-dec-2015: 110.14
s&p 500: 31-dec-2010: 100
30-dec-2011: 102.11
31-dec-2012: 118.45
31-dec-2013: 156.82
31-dec-2014: 178.28
31-dec-2015: 180.75
s&p financials: 31-dec-2010: 100
30-dec-2011: 82.94
31-dec-2012: 106.84
31-dec-2013: 144.9
31-dec-2014: 166.93
31-dec-2015: 164.39

.

Questions:
what was the value of citi in 2013 less the initial $100 investment?
what was the value of the s&p in 2013?
what is the value of that less an initial $100 investment
what is the normalized ratio of citi to the s&p in 2013?

Answers:
10.49
156.82
56.82
.185
2 0 0 8 a n n u a l r e p o r t stock performance graph the following graph sets forth the performance of our series a common , series b common stock , and series c common stock for the period september 18 , 2008 through december 31 , 2008 as compared with the performance of the standard and poor 2019s 500 index and a peer group index which consists of the walt disney company , time warner inc. , cbs corporation class b common stock , viacom , inc . class b common stock , news corporation class a common stock , and scripps network interactive , inc . the graph assumes $ 100 originally invested on september 18 , 2006 and that all subsequent dividends were reinvested in additional shares . september 18 , september 30 , december 31 , 2008 2008 2008 .

september 18 2008: disca: 100
discb: 100
disck: 100
s&p 500: 100
peer group: 100
september 30 2008: disca: 103.19
discb: 105.54
disck: 88.5
s&p 500: 96.54
peer group: 92.67
december 31 2008: disca: 102.53
discb: 78.53
disck: 83.69
s&p 500: 74.86
peer group: 68.79

s&p 500 peer group .

Questions:
from september 30 to december 31 of 2008, what was the decline in the performance price of the s&p 500?
and what was that price in december 31?
what is, then, that decline as a portion of this december amount?
and as of that same date, what was the performance price of the disck stock?
which price, then, was greater at december 31: the s&p 500 or the disck one?

Answers:
21.68
74.86
29%
83.69
yes
the table below summarizes activity of rsus with performance conditions for the year ended december 31 , shares ( in thousands ) weighted average grant date fair value ( per share ) .

shares ( in thousands ): non-vested total as of december 31 2016: 309
granted: 186
vested: -204
forfeited: -10
non-vested total as of december 31 2017: 281
weightedaverage grantdate fair value ( per share ): non-vested total as of december 31 2016: 55.94
granted: 63.1
vested: 46.1
forfeited: 70.5
non-vested total as of december 31 2017: 67.33

as of december 31 , 2017 , $ 6 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to the nonvested rsus , with and without performance conditions , is expected to be recognized over the weighted-average remaining life of 1.5 years . the total fair value of rsus , with and without performance conditions , vested was $ 16 million , $ 14 million and $ 12 million for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . if dividends are paid with respect to shares of the company 2019s common stock before the rsus are distributed , the company credits a liability for the value of the dividends that would have been paid if the rsus were shares of company common stock . when the rsus are distributed , the company pays the participant a lump sum cash payment equal to the value of the dividend equivalents accrued . the company accrued dividend equivalents totaling less than $ 1 million , $ 1 million and $ 1 million to accumulated deficit in the accompanying consolidated statements of changes in stockholders 2019 equity for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . employee stock purchase plan the company maintains a nonqualified employee stock purchase plan ( the 201cespp 201d ) through which employee participants may use payroll deductions to acquire company common stock at the lesser of 90% ( 90 % ) of the fair market value of the common stock at either the beginning or the end of a three-month purchase period . on february 15 , 2017 , the board adopted the american water works company , inc . and its designated subsidiaries 2017 nonqualified employee stock purchase plan , which was approved by stockholders on may 12 , 2017 and took effect on august 5 , 2017 . the prior plan was terminated as to new purchases of company stock effective august 31 , 2017 . as of december 31 , 2017 , there were 2.0 million shares of common stock reserved for issuance under the espp . the espp is considered compensatory . during the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , the company issued 93 thousand , 93 thousand and 98 thousand shares , respectively , under the espp. .

Questions:
what was the difference between the non-vested rsu's of 2017 and of 2016?
and what was the total of non-vested rsu's in 2016?
how much does that difference represent in relation to this total?

Answers:
-28
309
-9.1%
the graph below shows a five-year comparison of the cumulative shareholder return on our common stock with the cumulative total return of the standard & poor 2019s ( s&p ) mid cap 400 index and the russell 1000 index , both of which are published indices . comparison of five-year cumulative total return from december 31 , 2011 to december 31 , 2016 assumes $ 100 invested with reinvestment of dividends period indexed returns .

baseperiod 12/31/11: a . o . smith corporation: 100
s&p mid cap 400 index: 100
russell 1000 index: 100
baseperiod 12/31/12: a . o . smith corporation: 159.5
s&p mid cap 400 index: 117.9
russell 1000 index: 116.4
baseperiod 12/31/13: a . o . smith corporation: 275.8
s&p mid cap 400 index: 157.4
russell 1000 index: 155
baseperiod 12/31/14: a . o . smith corporation: 292
s&p mid cap 400 index: 172.8
russell 1000 index: 175.4
baseperiod 12/31/15: a . o . smith corporation: 401
s&p mid cap 400 index: 169
russell 1000 index: 177
12/31/16: a . o . smith corporation: 501.4
s&p mid cap 400 index: 204.1
russell 1000 index: 198.4

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 smith ( a o ) corp s&p midcap 400 index russell 1000 index .

Questions:
what was the net change in price for a.o. smith corp from 2011 to 2016?
what was the percent change?
what was the value of the s&p midcap index at the end of 2016?
what was the net change assuming a $100 initial investment?
what is the percent change?
what is the difference in the percents?

Answers:
401.4
401.4%
204.1
104.1
104.1%
297.3%
entergy new orleans , inc . and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis results of operations net income 2016 compared to 2015 net income increased $ 3.9 million primarily due to higher net revenue , partially offset by higher depreciation and amortization expenses , higher interest expense , and lower other income . 2015 compared to 2014 net income increased $ 13.9 million primarily due to lower other operation and maintenance expenses and higher net revenue , partially offset by a higher effective income tax rate . net revenue 2016 compared to 2015 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2016 to 2015 . amount ( in millions ) .

amount ( in millions ): 2015 net revenue: 293.9
retail electric price: 39
net gas revenue: -2.5
volume/weather: -5.1
other: -8.1
2016 net revenue: 317.2

the retail electric price variance is primarily due to an increase in the purchased power and capacity acquisition cost recovery rider , as approved by the city council , effective with the first billing cycle of march 2016 , primarily related to the purchase of power block 1 of the union power station . see note 14 to the financial statements for discussion of the union power station purchase . the net gas revenue variance is primarily due to the effect of less favorable weather on residential and commercial sales . the volume/weather variance is primarily due to a decrease of 112 gwh , or 2% ( 2 % ) , in billed electricity usage , partially offset by the effect of favorable weather on commercial sales and a 2% ( 2 % ) increase in the average number of electric customers. .

Questions:
what was the change in net revenue that was due the net gas revenue adjustment and the volume/weather adjustment, combined, in millions?
and what was the total in other adjustments, also in millions?
including this total to that change, what then becomes that change value, in millions?

Answers:
-7.6
-8.1
-15.7
table of contents the following performance graph is not 201csoliciting material , 201d is not deemed filed with the sec , and is not to be incorporated by reference into any of valero 2019s filings under the securities act of 1933 or the securities exchange act of 1934 , as amended , respectively . this performance graph and the related textual information are based on historical data and are not indicative of future performance . the following line graph compares the cumulative total return 1 on an investment in our common stock against the cumulative total return of the s&p 500 composite index and an index of peer companies ( that we selected ) for the five-year period commencing december 31 , 2007 and ending december 31 , 2012 . our peer group consists of the following ten companies : alon usa energy , inc. ; bp plc ( bp ) ; cvr energy , inc. ; hess corporation ; hollyfrontier corporation ; marathon petroleum corporation ; phillips 66 ( psx ) ; royal dutch shell plc ( rds ) ; tesoro corporation ; and western refining , inc . our peer group previously included chevron corporation ( cvx ) and exxon mobil corporation ( xom ) but they were replaced with bp , psx , and rds . in 2012 , psx became an independent downstream energy company and was added to our peer group . cvx and xom were replaced with bp and rds as they were viewed as having operations that more closely aligned with our core businesses . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return1 among valero energy corporation , the s&p 500 index , old peer group , and new peer group .

12/2007: valero common stock: 100
s&p 500: 100
old peer group: 100
new peer group: 100
12/2008: valero common stock: 31.45
s&p 500: 63
old peer group: 80.98
new peer group: 66.27
12/2009: valero common stock: 25.09
s&p 500: 79.67
old peer group: 76.54
new peer group: 86.87
12/2010: valero common stock: 35.01
s&p 500: 91.67
old peer group: 88.41
new peer group: 72.84
12/2011: valero common stock: 32.26
s&p 500: 93.61
old peer group: 104.33
new peer group: 74.7
12/2012: valero common stock: 53.61
s&p 500: 108.59
old peer group: 111.11
new peer group: 76.89

____________ 1 assumes that an investment in valero common stock and each index was $ 100 on december 31 , 2007 . 201ccumulative total return 201d is based on share price appreciation plus reinvestment of dividends from december 31 , 2007 through december 31 , 2012. .

Questions:
what was the performance price of the s&p 500 common stock in 2012?
and what was it in 2007?
what was, then, the change over the years?
and what is this change as a percentage of the 2007 performance price?
and only during the first year of that period, what was the biggest change in this performance price for the stocks shown in the board?
how much did this change represent in relation to the 2007 price of this stock?

Answers:
108.59
100.00
8.59
8.59%
68.55
0.6855
the company 2019s stock performance the following graph compares cumulative total return of the company 2019s common stock with the cumulative total return of ( i ) the nasdaq stock market-united states , and ( ii ) the nasdaq biotechnology index . the graph assumes ( a ) $ 100 was invested on july 31 , 2001 in each of the company 2019s common stock , the stocks comprising the nasdaq stock market-united states and the stocks comprising the nasdaq biotechnology index , and ( b ) the reinvestment of dividends . comparison of 65 month cumulative total return* among alexion pharmaceuticals , inc. , the nasdaq composite index and the nasdaq biotechnology index alexion pharmaceuticals , inc . nasdaq composite nasdaq biotechnology .

7/02: alexion pharmaceuticals inc .: 100
nasdaq composite: 100
nasdaq biotechnology: 100
7/03: alexion pharmaceuticals inc .: 108.38
nasdaq composite: 128.98
nasdaq biotechnology: 149.29
7/04: alexion pharmaceuticals inc .: 102.64
nasdaq composite: 142.51
nasdaq biotechnology: 146.51
7/05: alexion pharmaceuticals inc .: 167.89
nasdaq composite: 164.85
nasdaq biotechnology: 176.75
12/05: alexion pharmaceuticals inc .: 130.56
nasdaq composite: 168.24
nasdaq biotechnology: 186.1
12/06: alexion pharmaceuticals inc .: 260.41
nasdaq composite: 187.43
nasdaq biotechnology: 183.89
12/07: alexion pharmaceuticals inc .: 483.75
nasdaq composite: 204.78
nasdaq biotechnology: 187.04

.

Questions:
what was the value of the alexion pharmaceuticals inc . in march?
and what was it in february?
what was, then, the change over the year?
and how much does this change represent in relation to that value in february, in percentage?

Answers:
108.38
100
8.38
8.4%
entergy louisiana , llc and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis results of operations net income 2017 compared to 2016 net income decreased $ 305.7 million primarily due to the effect of the enactment of the tax cuts and jobs act , in december 2017 , which resulted in a decrease of $ 182.6 million in net income in 2017 , and the effect of a settlement with the irs related to the 2010-2011 irs audit , which resulted in a $ 136.1 million reduction of income tax expense in 2016 . also contributing to the decrease in net income were higher other operation and maintenance expenses . the decrease was partially offset by higher net revenue and higher other income . see note 3 to the financial statements for discussion of the effects of the tax cuts and jobs act and the irs audit . 2016 compared to 2015 net income increased $ 175.4 million primarily due to the effect of a settlement with the irs related to the 2010-2011 irs audit , which resulted in a $ 136.1 million reduction of income tax expense in 2016 . also contributing to the increase were lower other operation and maintenance expenses , higher net revenue , and higher other income . the increase was partially offset by higher depreciation and amortization expenses , higher interest expense , and higher nuclear refueling outage expenses . see note 3 to the financial statements for discussion of the irs audit . net revenue 2017 compared to 2016 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2017 to 2016 . amount ( in millions ) .

amount ( in millions ): 2016 net revenue: 2438.4
regulatory credit resulting from reduction of thefederal corporate income tax rate: 55.5
retail electric price: 42.8
louisiana act 55 financing savings obligation: 17.2
volume/weather: -12.4
other: 19
2017 net revenue: 2560.5

the regulatory credit resulting from reduction of the federal corporate income tax rate variance is due to the reduction of the vidalia purchased power agreement regulatory liability by $ 30.5 million and the reduction of the louisiana act 55 financing savings obligation regulatory liabilities by $ 25 million as a result of the enactment of the tax cuts and jobs act , in december 2017 , which lowered the federal corporate income tax rate from 35% ( 35 % ) to 21% ( 21 % ) . the effects of the tax cuts and jobs act are discussed further in note 3 to the financial statements. .

Questions:
what was the difference in net revenue between 2016 and 2017?
and the value for 2016 specifically?
so what was the percentage change during this time?

Answers:
122.1
2438.4
5%