sharick008/convfinqa huggingface dataset:
entergy corporation and subsidiaries notes to financial statements this difference as a regulatory asset or liability on an ongoing basis , resulting in a zero net balance for the regulatory asset at the end of the lease term . the amount was a net regulatory liability of $ 61.6 million and $ 27.8 million as of december 31 , 2013 and 2012 , respectively . as of december 31 , 2013 , system energy had future minimum lease payments ( reflecting an implicit rate of 5.13% ( 5.13 % ) ) , which are recorded as long-term debt , as follows : amount ( in thousands ) .

amount ( in thousands ): 2014: 51637
2015: 52253
2016: 13750
2017: 13750
2018: 13750
years thereafter: 247500
total: 392640
less : amount representing interest: 295226
present value of net minimum lease payments: 97414

.

Questions:
what were the future minimum lease payments in 2016?
and what were they in 2015?
what was, then, the change over the year?
and how much does this change represent in relation to those future minimum lease payments in 2015, in percentage?

Answers:
52253
13750
38503
280%
system energy resources , inc . management 2019s financial discussion and analysis also in addition to the contractual obligations , system energy has $ 382.3 million of unrecognized tax benefits and interest net of unused tax attributes and payments for which the timing of payments beyond 12 months cannot be reasonably estimated due to uncertainties in the timing of effective settlement of tax positions . see note 3 to the financial statements for additional information regarding unrecognized tax benefits . in addition to routine spending to maintain operations , the planned capital investment estimate includes specific investments and initiatives such as the nuclear fleet operational excellence initiative , as discussed below in 201cnuclear matters , 201d and plant improvements . as a wholly-owned subsidiary , system energy dividends its earnings to entergy corporation at a percentage determined monthly . sources of capital system energy 2019s sources to meet its capital requirements include : 2022 internally generated funds ; 2022 cash on hand ; 2022 debt issuances ; and 2022 bank financing under new or existing facilities . system energy may refinance , redeem , or otherwise retire debt prior to maturity , to the extent market conditions and interest and dividend rates are favorable . all debt and common stock issuances by system energy require prior regulatory approval . debt issuances are also subject to issuance tests set forth in its bond indentures and other agreements . system energy has sufficient capacity under these tests to meet its foreseeable capital needs . system energy 2019s receivables from the money pool were as follows as of december 31 for each of the following years. .

2015: ( in thousands ): ( in thousands )
$ 33809: 39926
2014: ( in thousands ): ( in thousands )
$ 33809: 2373
2013: ( in thousands ): ( in thousands )
$ 33809: 9223

see note 4 to the financial statements for a description of the money pool . the system energy nuclear fuel company variable interest entity has a credit facility in the amount of $ 120 million scheduled to expire in may 2019 . as of december 31 , 2016 , $ 66.9 million in letters of credit were outstanding under the credit facility to support a like amount of commercial paper issued by the system energy nuclear fuel company variable interest entity . see note 4 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the variable interest entity credit facility . system energy obtained authorizations from the ferc through october 2017 for the following : 2022 short-term borrowings not to exceed an aggregate amount of $ 200 million at any time outstanding ; 2022 long-term borrowings and security issuances ; and 2022 long-term borrowings by its nuclear fuel company variable interest entity . see note 4 to the financial statements for further discussion of system energy 2019s short-term borrowing limits. .

Questions:
what was the change in the system energy 2019s receivables from the money pool from 2015 and 2016?
what was the percentage change during this time?
what was the change in the system energy 2019s receivables form the money pool between 2014 and 2015?

Answers:
-6117
-15.3%
37553
the aes corporation notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) december 31 , 2011 , 2010 , and 2009 company for an aggregate proceeds of approximately $ 234 million . the company recognized a gain on disposal of $ 6 million , net of tax , during the year ended december 31 , 2010 . ras laffan was previously reported in the asia generation segment . 23 . acquisitions and dispositions acquisitions dpl 2014on november 28 , 2011 , aes completed its acquisition of 100% ( 100 % ) of the common stock of dpl for approximately $ 3.5 billion , pursuant to the terms and conditions of a definitive agreement ( the 201cmerger agreement 201d ) dated april 19 , 2011 . dpl serves over 500000 customers , primarily west central ohio , through its operating subsidiaries dp&l and dpl energy resources ( 201cdpler 201d ) . additionally , dpl operates over 3800 mw of power generation facilities and provides competitive retail energy services to residential , commercial , industrial and governmental customers . the acquisition strengthens the company 2019s u.s . utility operations by expanding in the midwest and pjm , a regional transmission organization serving several eastern states as part of the eastern interconnection . the company expects to benefit from the regional scale provided by indianapolis power & light company , its nearby integrated utility business in indiana . aes funded the aggregate purchase consideration through a combination of the following : 2022 the proceeds from a $ 1.05 billion term loan obtained in may 2011 ; 2022 the proceeds from a private offering of $ 1.0 billion notes in june 2011 ; 2022 temporary borrowings of $ 251 million under its revolving credit facility ; and 2022 the proceeds from private offerings of $ 450 million aggregate principal amount of 6.50% ( 6.50 % ) senior notes due 2016 and $ 800 million aggregate principal amount of 7.25% ( 7.25 % ) senior notes due 2021 ( collectively , the 201cnotes 201d ) in october 2011 by dolphin subsidiary ii , inc . ( 201cdolphin ii 201d ) , a wholly-owned special purpose indirect subsidiary of aes , which was merged into dpl upon the completion of acquisition . the fair value of the consideration paid for dpl was as follows ( in millions ) : .

$ 4719: less : fair value of assumed long-term debt outstanding net: -1255
cash consideration paid to dpl 2019s common stockholders: 3464
add : cash paid for outstanding stock-based awards: 19
total cash consideration paid: 3483

.

Questions:
what was the value of acquisition?
what is that times 1000?
what is the value of new borrowings over the acquisition product?

Answers:
3.5
3500
7.2%
host hotels & resorts , inc. , host hotels & resorts , l.p. , and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) cash paid for income taxes , net of refunds received , was $ 40 million , $ 15 million , and $ 9 million in 2017 , 2016 , and 2015 , respectively . a reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits is as follows ( in millions ) : .

2017: balance at january 1: 11
balance at december 31: 11
2016: balance at january 1: 11
balance at december 31: 11

all of such uncertain tax position amounts , if recognized , would impact our reconciliation between the income tax provision calculated at the statutory u.s . federal income tax rate of 35% ( 35 % ) ( 21% ( 21 % ) beginning with calendar year 2018 ) and the actual income tax provision recorded each year . as of december 31 , 2017 , the tax years that remain subject to examination by major tax jurisdictions generally include 2014-2017 . there were no material interest or penalties recorded for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 , and 2015 . 7 . leases taxable reit subsidiaries leases we lease substantially all of our hotels to a wholly owned subsidiary that qualifies as a taxable reit subsidiary due to federal income tax restrictions on a reit 2019s ability to derive revenue directly from the operation and management of a hotel . ground leases as of december 31 , 2017 , all or a portion of 26 of our hotels are subject to ground leases , generally with multiple renewal options , all of which are accounted for as operating leases . for lease agreements with scheduled rent increases , we recognize the lease expense ratably over the term of the lease . certain of these leases contain provisions for the payment of contingent rentals based on a percentage of sales in excess of stipulated amounts . other lease information we also have leases on facilities used in our former restaurant business , all of which we subsequently subleased . these leases and subleases contain one or more renewal options , generally for five- or ten-year periods . the restaurant leases are accounted for as operating leases . our contingent liability related to these leases is $ 9 million as of december 31 , 2017 . we , however , consider the likelihood of any material funding related to these leases to be remote . our leasing activity also includes those entered into by our hotels for various types of equipment , such as computer equipment , vehicles and telephone systems . equipment leases are accounted for either as operating or capital leases , depending upon the characteristics of the particular lease arrangement . equipment leases that are characterized as capital leases are classified as furniture and equipment and are depreciated over the life of the lease . the amortization expense applicable to capitalized leases is included in depreciation expense. .

Questions:
what was the net change in cash paid for income taxes, net of refunds received from 2016 to 2017?
what was this value in 2016?
what is the net change divided by the 2016 value?

Answers:
25
15
167%
stock price performance the following graph shows a comparison of the cumulative total return on our common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 index and the standard & poor 2019s retail index . the graph assumes that the value of an investment in our common stock and in each such index was $ 100 on december 31 , 2011 , and that any dividends have been reinvested . the comparison in the graph below is based solely on historical data and is not intended to forecast the possible future performance of our common stock . comparison of cumulative total return among advance auto parts , inc. , s&p 500 index and s&p retail index company/index december 31 , december 29 , december 28 , january 3 , january 2 , december 31 .

december 31 2011: advance auto parts: 100
s&p 500 index: 100
s&p retail index: 100
december 29 2012: advance auto parts: 102.87
s&p 500 index: 114.07
s&p retail index: 122.23
december 28 2013: advance auto parts: 158.46
s&p 500 index: 152.98
s&p retail index: 178.55
january 3 2015: advance auto parts: 228.88
s&p 500 index: 174.56
s&p retail index: 196.06
january 2 2016: advance auto parts: 217.49
s&p 500 index: 177.01
s&p retail index: 245.31
december 31 2016: advance auto parts: 244.64
s&p 500 index: 198.18
s&p retail index: 256.69

.

Questions:
what was the change in the value of s&p 500 index from january 2015 to january 2016?
and what was the value of that stock in january 2015?
how much does that change represent in relation to this 2015 value?

Answers:
2.45
174.56
1.4%
shareholder return performance the line graph below compares the annual percentage change in ball corporation fffds cumulative total shareholder return on its common stock with the cumulative total return of the dow jones containers & packaging index and the s&p composite 500 stock index for the five-year period ended december 31 , 2011 . it assumes $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2006 , and that all dividends were reinvested . the dow jones containers & packaging index total return has been weighted by market capitalization . total return to stockholders ( assumes $ 100 investment on 12/31/06 ) total return analysis .

12/31/2006: ball corporation: 100
dj us containers & packaging: 100
s&p 500: 100
12/31/2007: ball corporation: 104.05
dj us containers & packaging: 106.73
s&p 500: 105.49
12/31/2008: ball corporation: 97.04
dj us containers & packaging: 66.91
s&p 500: 66.46
12/31/2009: ball corporation: 121.73
dj us containers & packaging: 93.98
s&p 500: 84.05
12/31/2010: ball corporation: 161.39
dj us containers & packaging: 110.23
s&p 500: 96.71
12/31/2011: ball corporation: 170.7
dj us containers & packaging: 110.39
s&p 500: 98.75

copyright a9 2012 standard & poor fffds , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm ) copyright a9 2012 dow jones & company . all rights reserved. .

Questions:
what was the value of ball corporation in 2008?
what is the change in value from the initial $100 investment?
what is the percent change?

Answers:
97.04
-2.96
2.96%
performance graph the graph below compares the cumulative total shareholder return on pmi's common stock with the cumulative total return for the same period of pmi's peer group and the s&p 500 index . the graph assumes the investment of $ 100 as of december 31 , 2012 , in pmi common stock ( at prices quoted on the new york stock exchange ) and each of the indices as of the market close and reinvestment of dividends on a quarterly basis . date pmi pmi peer group ( 1 ) s&p 500 index .

pmi: december 31 2012: 100
december 31 2013: 108.5
december 31 2014: 106.2
december 31 2015: 120.4
december 31 2016: 130.8
december 31 2017: 156.8
pmi peer group ( 1 ): december 31 2012: 100
december 31 2013: 122.8
december 31 2014: 132.5
december 31 2015: 143.5
december 31 2016: 145.6
december 31 2017: 172.7
s&p 500 index: december 31 2012: 100
december 31 2013: 132.4
december 31 2014: 150.5
december 31 2015: 152.6
december 31 2016: 170.8
december 31 2017: 208.1

( 1 ) the pmi peer group presented in this graph is the same as that used in the prior year , except reynolds american inc . was removed following the completion of its acquisition by british american tobacco p.l.c . on july 25 , 2017 . the pmi peer group was established based on a review of four characteristics : global presence ; a focus on consumer products ; and net revenues and a market capitalization of a similar size to those of pmi . the review also considered the primary international tobacco companies . as a result of this review , the following companies constitute the pmi peer group : altria group , inc. , anheuser-busch inbev sa/nv , british american tobacco p.l.c. , the coca-cola company , colgate-palmolive co. , diageo plc , heineken n.v. , imperial brands plc , japan tobacco inc. , johnson & johnson , kimberly-clark corporation , the kraft-heinz company , mcdonald's corp. , mondel z international , inc. , nestl e9 s.a. , pepsico , inc. , the procter & gamble company , roche holding ag , and unilever nv and plc . note : figures are rounded to the nearest $ 0.10. .

Questions:
what was the pmi value at the end of 2017 less 100?
now, what is that value divided by 100?
what was the s&p value at the end of 2017?
what was the s&p value at the end of 2017 less 100?
now, what is that value divided by 100?
what is the difference of the normalized values of pmi and the s&p?

Answers:
56.8
56.8%
208.10
108.1
108.1%
-51.3%
part ii item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities our ordinary shares have been publicly traded since november 17 , 2011 when our ordinary shares were listed and began trading on the new york stock exchange ( 201cnyse 201d ) under the symbol 201cdlph . 201d on december 4 , 2017 , following the spin-off of delphi technologies , the company changed its name to aptiv plc and its nyse symbol to 201captv . 201d as of january 25 , 2019 , there were 2 shareholders of record of our ordinary shares . the following graph reflects the comparative changes in the value from december 31 , 2013 through december 31 , 2018 , assuming an initial investment of $ 100 and the reinvestment of dividends , if any in ( 1 ) our ordinary shares , ( 2 ) the s&p 500 index and ( 3 ) the automotive peer group . historical share prices of our ordinary shares have been adjusted to reflect the separation . historical performance may not be indicative of future shareholder returns . stock performance graph * $ 100 invested on december 31 , 2013 in our stock or in the relevant index , including reinvestment of dividends . fiscal year ended december 31 , 2018 . ( 1 ) aptiv plc , adjusted for the distribution of delphi technologies on december 4 , 2017 ( 2 ) s&p 500 2013 standard & poor 2019s 500 total return index ( 3 ) automotive peer group 2013 adient plc , american axle & manufacturing holdings inc , aptiv plc , borgwarner inc , cooper tire & rubber co , cooper- standard holdings inc , dana inc , dorman products inc , ford motor co , garrett motion inc. , general motors co , gentex corp , gentherm inc , genuine parts co , goodyear tire & rubber co , lear corp , lkq corp , meritor inc , motorcar parts of america inc , standard motor products inc , stoneridge inc , superior industries international inc , tenneco inc , tesla inc , tower international inc , visteon corp , wabco holdings inc company index december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 .

december 31 2013: aptiv plc ( 1 ): 100
s&p 500 ( 2 ): 100
automotive peer group ( 3 ): 100
december 31 2014: aptiv plc ( 1 ): 122.75
s&p 500 ( 2 ): 113.69
automotive peer group ( 3 ): 107.96
december 31 2015: aptiv plc ( 1 ): 146.49
s&p 500 ( 2 ): 115.26
automotive peer group ( 3 ): 108.05
december 31 2016: aptiv plc ( 1 ): 117.11
s&p 500 ( 2 ): 129.05
automotive peer group ( 3 ): 107.72
december 31 2017: aptiv plc ( 1 ): 178.46
s&p 500 ( 2 ): 157.22
automotive peer group ( 3 ): 134.04
december 31 2018: aptiv plc ( 1 ): 130.8
s&p 500 ( 2 ): 150.33
automotive peer group ( 3 ): 106.89

.

Questions:
what was the change in price for aptiv plc between 12/31/13 and 12/31/18?
and the price for s&p 500 as of 12/31/18?
and the change in price between 12/31/13?
so what was the growth for aptiv plc?
and for s&p 500?
so what was the difference between the two return rates?

Answers:
30.8
150.33
50.33
30.8%
50.33%
-19.53%
stock performance graph the following graph provides a comparison of five year cumulative total stockholder returns of teleflex common stock , the standard a0& poor 2019s ( s&p ) 500 stock index and the s&p 500 healthcare equipment & supply index . the annual changes for the five-year period shown on the graph are based on the assumption that $ 100 had been invested in teleflex common stock and each index on december a031 , 2012 and that all dividends were reinvested . market performance .

2012: teleflex incorporated: 100
s&p 500 index: 100
s&p 500 healthcare equipment & supply index: 100
2013: teleflex incorporated: 134
s&p 500 index: 132
s&p 500 healthcare equipment & supply index: 128
2014: teleflex incorporated: 166
s&p 500 index: 151
s&p 500 healthcare equipment & supply index: 161
2015: teleflex incorporated: 192
s&p 500 index: 153
s&p 500 healthcare equipment & supply index: 171
2016: teleflex incorporated: 237
s&p 500 index: 171
s&p 500 healthcare equipment & supply index: 181
2017: teleflex incorporated: 368
s&p 500 index: 208
s&p 500 healthcare equipment & supply index: 238

s&p 500 healthcare equipment & supply index 100 128 161 171 181 238 .

Questions:
what is the net change in value of the s&p 500 index from 2012 to 2017?
what is the percent change?

Answers:
108
108%
packaging corporation of america notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) december 31 , 2005 9 . shareholders 2019 equity ( continued ) stockholder received proceeds , net of the underwriting discount , of $ 20.69 per share . the company did not sell any shares in , or receive any proceeds from , the secondary offering . concurrent with the closing of the secondary offering on december 21 , 2005 , the company entered into a common stock repurchase agreement with pca holdings llc . pursuant to the repurchase agreement , the company purchased 4500000 shares of common stock directly from pca holdings llc at the initial price to the public net of the underwriting discount or $ 20.69 per share , the same net price per share received by pca holdings llc in the secondary offering . these shares were retired on december 21 , 2005 . 10 . commitments and contingencies capital commitments the company had authorized capital expenditures of approximately $ 33.1 million and $ 55.2 million as of december 31 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively , in connection with the expansion and replacement of existing facilities and equipment . operating leases pca leases space for certain of its facilities and cutting rights to approximately 108000 acres of timberland under long-term leases . the company also leases equipment , primarily vehicles and rolling stock , and other assets under long-term leases of a duration generally of three years . the minimum lease payments under non-cancelable operating leases with lease terms in excess of one year are as follows : ( in thousands ) .

$ 24569: 2007: 21086
2008: 14716
2009: 9801
2010: 6670
thereafter: 37130
total: 113972

capital lease obligations were not significant to the accompanying financial statements . total lease expense , including base rent on all leases and executory costs , such as insurance , taxes , and maintenance , for the years ended december 31 , 2005 , 2004 and 2003 was $ 35.8 million , $ 33.0 million and $ 31.6 million , respectively . these costs are included in cost of goods sold and selling and administrative expenses. .

Questions:
what was the value of lease expense, including base rent on all leases and executory costs, such as insurance, taxes, and maintenance in 2004?
what was the value in 2003?
what is net change in value?
what was the 2003 value?
what is the percent change?

Answers:
33.0
31.6
1.4
31.6
4%