sharick008/convfinqa huggingface dataset:
n o t e s t o c o n s o l i d a t e d f i n a n c i a l s t a t e m e n t s ( continued ) ace limited and subsidiaries the following table shows changes in the company 2019s stock options for the years ended december 31 , 2008 , 2007 , and number of options weighted average exercise price .

number of options: options outstanding december 31 2005: 12643761
granted: 1612507
exercised: -2650733
forfeited: -309026
options outstanding december 31 2006: 11752521
options outstanding december 31 2007: 11270815
options outstanding december 31 2008: 9923563
weightedaverageexercise price: options outstanding december 31 2005: 36.53
granted: 60.17
exercised: 36.25
forfeited: 54.31
options outstanding december 31 2006: 39.43
options outstanding december 31 2007: 42.12
options outstanding december 31 2008: 46.24

the weighted-average remaining contractual term was 5.8 years for the stock options outstanding and 4.6 years for the stock options exercisable at december 31 , 2008 . the total intrinsic value was approximately $ 66 million for stock options out- standing and $ 81 million for stock options exercisable at december 31 , 2008 . the weighted-average fair value for the stock options granted for the year ended december 31 , 2008 was $ 17.60 . the total intrinsic value for stock options exercised dur- ing the years ended december 31 , 2008 , 2007 , and 2006 , was approximately $ 54 million , $ 44 million , and $ 43 million , respectively . the amount of cash received during the year ended december 31 , 2008 , from the exercise of stock options was $ 97 million . restricted stock the company 2019s 2004 ltip also provides for grants of restricted stock . the company generally grants restricted stock with a 4-year vesting period , based on a graded vesting schedule . the restricted stock is granted at market close price on the date of grant . included in the company 2019s share-based compensation expense in the year ended december 31 , 2008 , is a portion of the cost related to the unvested restricted stock granted in the years 2004 to 2008. .

Questions:
how many options outstanding were there at of december 31, 2008?
how many options outstanding were there at of december 31, 2005?
what was the net change in number of options?
what was the percent change?

Answers:
9923563
12643761
-2720198
-21.5%
entergy new orleans , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis results of operations net income ( loss ) 2004 compared to 2003 net income increased $ 20.2 million primarily due to higher net revenue . 2003 compared to 2002 entergy new orleans had net income of $ 7.9 million in 2003 compared to a net loss in 2002 . the increase was due to higher net revenue and lower interest expense , partially offset by higher other operation and maintenance expenses and depreciation and amortization expenses . net revenue 2004 compared to 2003 net revenue , which is entergy new orleans' measure of gross margin , consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related , and purchased power expenses and 2 ) other regulatory credits . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2004 to 2003. .

( in millions ): 2003 net revenue: 208.3
base rates: 10.6
volume/weather: 8.3
2004 deferrals: 7.5
price applied to unbilled electric sales: 3.7
other: 0.6
2004 net revenue: 239

the increase in base rates was effective june 2003 . the rate increase is discussed in note 2 to the domestic utility companies and system energy financial statements . the volume/weather variance is primarily due to increased billed electric usage of 162 gwh in the industrial service sector . the increase was partially offset by milder weather in the residential and commercial sectors . the 2004 deferrals variance is due to the deferral of voluntary severance plan and fossil plant maintenance expenses in accordance with a stipulation approved by the city council in august 2004 . the stipulation allows for the recovery of these costs through amortization of a regulatory asset . the voluntary severance plan and fossil plant maintenance expenses are being amortized over a five-year period that became effective january 2004 and january 2003 , respectively . the formula rate plan is discussed in note 2 to the domestic utility companies and system energy financial statements . the price applied to unbilled electric sales variance is due to an increase in the fuel price applied to unbilled sales. .

Questions:
what was the 2004 net revenue?
what was the 2003 net revenue?
what was the difference?
what was the value for volume/weather?
what is the ratio of volume/weather to the difference in revenue?

Answers:
239.0
208.3
30.7
8.3
27.0%
stock performance graph the following performance graph compares the cumulative total return ( including dividends ) to the holders of our common stock from december 31 , 2002 through december 31 , 2007 , with the cumulative total returns of the nyse composite index , the ftse nareit composite reit index ( the 201call reit index 201d ) , the ftse nareit healthcare equity reit index ( the 201chealthcare reit index 201d ) and the russell 1000 index over the same period . the comparison assumes $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2002 in our common stock and in each of the foregoing indices and assumes reinvestment of dividends , as applicable . we have included the nyse composite index in the performance graph because our common stock is listed on the nyse . we have included the other indices because we believe that they are either most representative of the industry in which we compete , or otherwise provide a fair basis for comparison with ventas , and are therefore particularly relevant to an assessment of our performance . the figures in the table below are rounded to the nearest dollar. .

12/31/2002: ventas: 100
nyse composite index: 100
all reit index: 100
healthcare reit index: 100
russell 1000 index: 100
12/31/2003: ventas: 206
nyse composite index: 132
all reit index: 138
healthcare reit index: 154
russell 1000 index: 130
12/31/2004: ventas: 270
nyse composite index: 151
all reit index: 181
healthcare reit index: 186
russell 1000 index: 145
12/31/2005: ventas: 331
nyse composite index: 166
all reit index: 196
healthcare reit index: 189
russell 1000 index: 154
12/31/2006: ventas: 457
nyse composite index: 200
all reit index: 262
healthcare reit index: 273
russell 1000 index: 178
12/31/2007: ventas: 512
nyse composite index: 217
all reit index: 215
healthcare reit index: 279
russell 1000 index: 188

ventas nyse composite index all reit index healthcare reit index russell 1000 index .

Questions:
what was the difference between the value of the nyse composite index in 2007 and 2002?
how much does that difference represent in relation to the 2002 value?

Answers:
117
117%
changes in our performance retention awards during 2009 were as follows : shares ( thous. ) weighted-average grant-date fair value .

shares ( thous. ): nonvested at january 1 2009: 873
granted: 449
vested: -240
forfeited: -22
nonvested at december 31 2009: 1060
weighted-averagegrant-date fair value: nonvested at january 1 2009: 50.7
granted: 47.28
vested: 43.23
forfeited: 53.86
nonvested at december 31 2009: 50.88

at december 31 , 2009 , there was $ 22 million of total unrecognized compensation expense related to nonvested performance retention awards , which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.3 years . a portion of this expense is subject to achievement of the roic levels established for the performance stock unit grants . 5 . retirement plans pension and other postretirement benefits pension plans 2013 we provide defined benefit retirement income to eligible non-union employees through qualified and non-qualified ( supplemental ) pension plans . qualified and non-qualified pension benefits are based on years of service and the highest compensation during the latest years of employment , with specific reductions made for early retirements . other postretirement benefits ( opeb ) 2013 we provide defined contribution medical and life insurance benefits for eligible retirees . these benefits are funded as medical claims and life insurance premiums are plan amendment effective january 1 , 2010 , medicare-eligible retirees who are enrolled in the union pacific retiree medical program will receive a contribution to a health reimbursement account , which can be used to pay eligible out-of-pocket medical expenses . the impact of the plan amendment is reflected in the projected benefit obligation ( pbo ) at december 31 , 2009 . funded status we are required by gaap to separately recognize the overfunded or underfunded status of our pension and opeb plans as an asset or liability . the funded status represents the difference between the pbo and the fair value of the plan assets . the pbo is the present value of benefits earned to date by plan participants , including the effect of assumed future salary increases . the pbo of the opeb plan is equal to the accumulated benefit obligation , as the present value of the opeb liabilities is not affected by salary increases . plan assets are measured at fair value . we use a december 31 measurement date for plan assets and obligations for all our retirement plans. .

Questions:
what was the amount of total unrecognized compensation expense related to nonvested performance retention awards?
and converted to the ten millions?
so what was the annual compensation expense for the remaining unvested performance retention awards?

Answers:
22
22000000
1692307
stock performance graph the following graph compares the most recent five-year performance of alcoa 2019s common stock with ( 1 ) the standard & poor 2019s 500 ae index and ( 2 ) the standard & poor 2019s 500 ae materials index , a group of 27 companies categorized by standard & poor 2019s as active in the 201cmaterials 201d market sector . such information shall not be deemed to be 201cfiled . 201d five-year cumulative total return based upon an initial investment of $ 100 on december 31 , 2010 with dividends reinvested alcoa inc . s&p 500 ae index s&p 500 ae materials index dec-'10 dec-'11 dec-'12 dec-'14 dec-'15dec-'13 .

2010: alcoainc .: 100
s&p 500 aeindex: 100
s&p 500 aematerials index: 100
2011: alcoainc .: 57
s&p 500 aeindex: 102
s&p 500 aematerials index: 90
2012: alcoainc .: 58
s&p 500 aeindex: 118
s&p 500 aematerials index: 104
2013: alcoainc .: 72
s&p 500 aeindex: 157
s&p 500 aematerials index: 130
2014: alcoainc .: 107
s&p 500 aeindex: 178
s&p 500 aematerials index: 139
2015: alcoainc .: 68
s&p 500 aeindex: 181
s&p 500 aematerials index: 128

s&p 500 ae index 100 102 118 157 178 181 s&p 500 ae materials index 100 90 104 130 139 128 copyright a9 2016 standard & poor 2019s , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . source : research data group , inc . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm ) .

Questions:
what was the investment on the alcoainc . in 2014?
and what was it in 2013?
how much, then, does the 2014 investment represent in relation to the 2013 one?
and what is the difference between this value and the number one?

Answers:
107
72
1.486
48.6%
performance graph the graph below compares the cumulative total shareholder return on pmi's common stock with the cumulative total return for the same period of pmi's peer group and the s&p 500 index . the graph assumes the investment of $ 100 as of december 31 , 2012 , in pmi common stock ( at prices quoted on the new york stock exchange ) and each of the indices as of the market close and reinvestment of dividends on a quarterly basis . date pmi pmi peer group ( 1 ) s&p 500 index .

pmi: december 31 2012: 100
december 31 2013: 108.5
december 31 2014: 106.2
december 31 2015: 120.4
december 31 2016: 130.8
december 31 2017: 156.8
pmi peer group ( 1 ): december 31 2012: 100
december 31 2013: 122.8
december 31 2014: 132.5
december 31 2015: 143.5
december 31 2016: 145.6
december 31 2017: 172.7
s&p 500 index: december 31 2012: 100
december 31 2013: 132.4
december 31 2014: 150.5
december 31 2015: 152.6
december 31 2016: 170.8
december 31 2017: 208.1

( 1 ) the pmi peer group presented in this graph is the same as that used in the prior year , except reynolds american inc . was removed following the completion of its acquisition by british american tobacco p.l.c . on july 25 , 2017 . the pmi peer group was established based on a review of four characteristics : global presence ; a focus on consumer products ; and net revenues and a market capitalization of a similar size to those of pmi . the review also considered the primary international tobacco companies . as a result of this review , the following companies constitute the pmi peer group : altria group , inc. , anheuser-busch inbev sa/nv , british american tobacco p.l.c. , the coca-cola company , colgate-palmolive co. , diageo plc , heineken n.v. , imperial brands plc , japan tobacco inc. , johnson & johnson , kimberly-clark corporation , the kraft-heinz company , mcdonald's corp. , mondel z international , inc. , nestl e9 s.a. , pepsico , inc. , the procter & gamble company , roche holding ag , and unilever nv and plc . note : figures are rounded to the nearest $ 0.10. .

Questions:
what was the change in the pmi's share price from 2012 to 2013?
and how much did this change represent in relation to that price in 2012?
and in the two years subsequent to this period, what was the change in the price of that share?
what is this change as a portion of the 2014 price?

Answers:
8.5
8.5%
14.2
13.4%
34| | duke realty corporation annual report 2009 property investment we evaluate development and acquisition opportunities based upon market outlook , supply and long-term growth potential . our ability to make future property investments is dependent upon our continued access to our longer-term sources of liquidity including the issuances of debt or equity securities as well as generating cash flow by disposing of selected properties . in light of current economic conditions , management continues to evaluate our investment priorities and is focused on accretive growth . we have continued to operate at a substantially reduced level of new development activity , as compared to recent years , and are focused on the core operations of our existing base of properties . recurring expenditures one of our principal uses of our liquidity is to fund the recurring leasing/capital expenditures of our real estate investments . the following is a summary of our recurring capital expenditures for the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively ( in thousands ) : dividends and distributions we are required to meet the distribution requirements of the internal revenue code of 1986 , as amended ( the 201ccode 201d ) , in order to maintain our reit status . because depreciation and impairments are non-cash expenses , cash flow will typically be greater than operating income . we paid dividends per share of $ 0.76 , $ 1.93 and $ 1.91 for the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively . we expect to continue to distribute at least an amount equal to our taxable earnings , to meet the requirements to maintain our reit status , and additional amounts as determined by our board of directors . distributions are declared at the discretion of our board of directors and are subject to actual cash available for distribution , our financial condition , capital requirements and such other factors as our board of directors deems relevant . at december 31 , 2009 we had six series of preferred shares outstanding . the annual dividend rates on our preferred shares range between 6.5% ( 6.5 % ) and 8.375% ( 8.375 % ) and are paid in arrears quarterly. .

2009: recurring tenant improvements: 29321
recurring leasing costs: 40412
building improvements: 9321
totals: 79054
2008: recurring tenant improvements: 36885
recurring leasing costs: 28205
building improvements: 9724
totals: 74814
2007: recurring tenant improvements: 45296
recurring leasing costs: 32238
building improvements: 8402
totals: 85936

.

Questions:
what was the net change in the dividend payment from 2007 to 2008?
what was the 2007 dividend payment?
what is the percent change?

Answers:
0.02
1.91
1%
entergy corporation and subsidiaries management's financial discussion and analysis refer to 201cselected financial data - five-year comparison of entergy corporation and subsidiaries 201d which accompanies entergy corporation 2019s financial statements in this report for further information with respect to operating statistics . in november 2007 the board approved a plan to pursue a separation of entergy 2019s non-utility nuclear business from entergy through a spin-off of the business to entergy shareholders . in april 2010 , entergy announced that it planned to unwind the business infrastructure associated with the proposed spin-off transaction . as a result of the plan to unwind the business infrastructure , entergy recorded expenses in 2010 for the write-off of certain capitalized costs incurred in connection with the planned spin-off transaction . these costs are discussed in more detail below and throughout this section . net revenue utility following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2010 to 2009 . amount ( in millions ) .

amount ( in millions ): 2009 net revenue: 4694
volume/weather: 231
retail electric price: 137
provision for regulatory proceedings: 26
rough production cost equalization: 19
ano decommissioning trust: -24
fuel recovery: -44
other: 12
2010 net revenue: 5051

the volume/weather variance is primarily due to an increase of 8362 gwh , or 8% ( 8 % ) , in billed electricity usage in all retail sectors , including the effect on the residential sector of colder weather in the first quarter 2010 compared to 2009 and warmer weather in the second and third quarters 2010 compared to 2009 . the industrial sector reflected strong sales growth on continuing signs of economic recovery . the improvement in this sector was primarily driven by inventory restocking and strong exports with the chemicals , refining , and miscellaneous manufacturing sectors leading the improvement . the retail electric price variance is primarily due to : increases in the formula rate plan riders at entergy gulf states louisiana effective november 2009 , january 2010 , and september 2010 , at entergy louisiana effective november 2009 , and at entergy mississippi effective july 2009 ; a base rate increase at entergy arkansas effective july 2010 ; rate actions at entergy texas , including base rate increases effective in may and august 2010 ; a formula rate plan provision of $ 16.6 million recorded in the third quarter 2009 for refunds that were made to customers in accordance with settlements approved by the lpsc ; and the recovery in 2009 by entergy arkansas of 2008 extraordinary storm costs , as approved by the apsc , which ceased in january 2010 . the recovery of storm costs is offset in other operation and maintenance expenses . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the proceedings referred to above. .

Questions:
what was net revenue in 2010?
what was net revenue in 2009?
what was the difference in net revenues?
what is the value of retail elastic price to the difference in net revenue?

Answers:
5051
4694
357
38.4%
management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations ( continued ) the following results drove changes in ccg operating income by approximately the amounts indicated: .

operating income reconciliation: $ 10646: 2016
1250: lower ccg platform unit cost
905: lower ccg operating expense
625: 1
-645 ( 645 ): 10
345: other
$ 8166: 2015
-2060 ( 2060 ): higher ccg platform unit costs
-1565 ( 1565 ): 2
435: 14
430: 14
375: lower operating expense
224: other
$ 10327: 2014

1 higher gross margin from higher ccg platform revenue was driven by higher average selling prices on notebook and desktop platforms , offset by lower desktop and notebook platform unit sales . 2 lower gross margin from lower ccg platform revenue was driven by lower desktop and notebook platform unit sales , partially offset by higher average selling prices on desktop , notebook , and tablet platforms . data center group segment product overview the dcg operating segment offers platforms designed to provide leading energy-efficient performance for all server , network , and storage applications . in addition , dcg focuses on lowering the total cost of ownership on other specific workload- optimizations for the enterprise , cloud service providers , and communications service provider market segments . in 2016 , we launched the following platforms with an array of functionalities and advancements : 2022 intel ae xeon ae processor e5 v4 family , the foundation for high performing clouds and delivers energy-efficient performance for server , network , and storage workloads . 2022 intel xeon processor e7 v4 family , targeted at platforms requiring four or more cpus ; this processor family delivers high performance and is optimized for real-time analytics and in-memory computing , along with industry-leading reliability , availability , and serviceability . 2022 intel ae xeon phi 2122 product family , formerly code-named knights landing , with up to 72 high-performance intel processor cores , integrated memory and fabric , and a common software programming model with intel xeon processors . the intel xeon phi product family is designed for highly parallel compute and memory bandwidth-intensive workloads . intel xeon phi processors are positioned to increase the performance of supercomputers , enabling trillions of calculations per second , and to address emerging data analytics and artificial intelligence solutions . in 2017 , we expect to release our next generation of intel xeon processors for compute , storage , and network ; a next-generation intel xeon phi processor optimized for deep learning ; and a suite of single-socket products , including next-generation intel xeon e3 processors , next-generation intel atom processors , and next-generation intel xeon-d processors for dense solutions. .

Questions:
what is the difference in ccg operating income between 2014 and 2015?
and the specific amount for 2014 again?
so then what is the growth rate over these years?

Answers:
-2161
10327
-20.9%
notes to consolidated financial statements at december 31 , 2007 , future minimum rental payments required under operating leases for continuing operations that have initial or remaining noncancelable lease terms in excess of one year , net of sublease rental income , most of which pertain to real estate leases , are as follows : ( millions ) .

$ 317: 2009: 275
2010: 236
2011: 214
2012: 191
later years: 597
total minimum payments required: 1830

aon corporation .

Questions:
what is the difference between the net rent expense of the years 2009 and 2008?
how much does that difference represent, percentually, in relation to the net expense in the year of 2008?

Answers:
-42
-13.2%