sharick008/convfinqa huggingface dataset:
celanese purchases of its equity securities information regarding repurchases of our common stock during the three months ended december 31 , 2014 is as follows : period number of shares purchased ( 1 ) average price paid per share total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced program approximate dollar value of shares remaining that may be purchased under the program ( 2 ) .

totalnumberof sharespurchased ( 1 ): october 1 - 31 2014: 192580
november 1 - 30 2014: 468128
december 1 - 31 2014: 199796
total: 860504
averageprice paidper share: october 1 - 31 2014: 58.02
november 1 - 30 2014: 59.25
december 1 - 31 2014: 60.78
total numberof sharespurchased aspart of publiclyannounced program: october 1 - 31 2014: 164800
november 1 - 30 2014: 468128
december 1 - 31 2014: 190259
total: 823187
approximatedollarvalue of sharesremaining thatmay bepurchased underthe program ( 2 ): october 1 - 31 2014: 490000000
november 1 - 30 2014: 463000000
december 1 - 31 2014: 451000000

___________________________ ( 1 ) includes 27780 and 9537 for october and december 2014 , respectively , related to shares withheld from employees to cover their statutory minimum withholding requirements for personal income taxes related to the vesting of restricted stock units . ( 2 ) our board of directors has authorized the aggregate repurchase of $ 1.4 billion of our common stock since february 2008 . see note 17 - stockholders' equity in the accompanying consolidated financial statements for further information . performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed "soliciting material" or to be "filed" with the securities and exchange commission , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that we specifically incorporate it by reference into such filing . comparison of cumulative total return .

Questions:
what was the total number of shares purchased in december of 2014?
and what was the average price paid for each of those shares?
what was, then, the total amount spent in the purchase of those shares?
and how much is that in millions?

Answers:
199796
60.78
12143600.88
12.1
.

12/07: fidelity national information services inc .: 100
s&p 500: 100
s&p supercap data processing & outsourced services: 100
12/08: fidelity national information services inc .: 70.08
s&p 500: 63
s&p supercap data processing & outsourced services: 68.26
12/09: fidelity national information services inc .: 101.93
s&p 500: 79.67
s&p supercap data processing & outsourced services: 99.41
12/10: fidelity national information services inc .: 120.01
s&p 500: 91.67
s&p supercap data processing & outsourced services: 97.33
12/11: fidelity national information services inc .: 117.34
s&p 500: 93.61
s&p supercap data processing & outsourced services: 118.68
12/12: fidelity national information services inc .: 157.38
s&p 500: 108.59
s&p supercap data processing & outsourced services: 151.9

s&p supercap data processing & outsourced 100.00 68.26 99.41 97.33 118.68 151.90 item 6 . selected financial data . the selected financial data set forth below constitutes historical financial data of fis and should be read in conjunction with item 7 , management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations , and item 8 , financial statements and supplementary data , included elsewhere in this report . on october 1 , 2009 , we completed the acquisition of metavante technologies , inc . ( "metavante" ) . the results of operations and financial position of metavante are included in the consolidated financial statements since the date of acquisition . on july 2 , 2008 , we completed the spin-off of lender processing services , inc. , which was a former wholly-owned subsidiary ( "lps" ) . for accounting purposes , the results of lps are presented as discontinued operations . accordingly , all prior periods have been restated to present the results of fis on a stand alone basis and include the results of lps up to july 2 , 2008 , as discontinued operations. .

Questions:
what is the value of an investment in fidelity national information services inc. in 2012?
what is the net change from the initial value?
what is the rate of return?
what about the change in value of an investment in s&p500 from 2007 to 2012?
what rate of return does this represent?
what is the difference in the rate of returns?

Answers:
157.38
57.38
57.38%
8.59
8.59%
48.79%
2mar201707015999 ( c ) in october 2016 , our accelerated share repurchase ( 2018 2018asr 2019 2019 ) agreement concluded and we received an additional 44 thousand shares of our common stock . shares purchased pursuant to the asr agreement are presented in the table above in the periods in which they were received . performance graph the following graph compares the performance of our common stock with that of the s&p 500 index and the s&p 500 healthcare equipment index . the cumulative total return listed below assumes an initial investment of $ 100 at the market close on december 30 , 2011 and reinvestment of dividends . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return 2011 2012 2016201520142013 edwards lifesciences corporation s&p 500 s&p 500 healthcare equipment index december 31 .

2012: edwards lifesciences: 127.54
s&p 500: 116
s&p 500 healthcare equipment index: 117.42
2013: edwards lifesciences: 93.01
s&p 500: 153.58
s&p 500 healthcare equipment index: 150.28
2014: edwards lifesciences: 180.17
s&p 500: 174.6
s&p 500 healthcare equipment index: 181.96
2015: edwards lifesciences: 223.42
s&p 500: 177.01
s&p 500 healthcare equipment index: 194.37
2016: edwards lifesciences: 265.06
s&p 500: 198.18
s&p 500 healthcare equipment index: 207.46

.

Questions:
what is the increase in value of an investment in edwards lifesciences from 2011 to 2016?
what percentage change does this represent?
what about the value of an investment in s&p500 in 2016?
what is the net increase?
what percentage change does this represenet?
what is the difference in rate of returns of these investments?

Answers:
165.06
165%
198.18
98.18
98%
67%
table of contents capital deployment program will be subject to market and economic conditions , applicable legal requirements and other relevant factors . our capital deployment program does not obligate us to continue a dividend for any fixed period , and payment of dividends may be suspended at any time at our discretion . stock performance graph the following stock performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or 201cfiled 201d with the securities and exchange commission , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filings under the securities act of 1933 or the exchange act , each as amended , except to the extent that we specifically incorporate it by reference into such filing . the following stock performance graph compares our cumulative total stockholder return on an annual basis on our common stock with the cumulative total return on the standard and poor 2019s 500 stock index and the amex airline index from december 9 , 2013 ( the first trading day of aag common stock ) through december 31 , 2015 . the comparison assumes $ 100 was invested on december 9 , 2013 in aag common stock and in each of the foregoing indices and assumes reinvestment of dividends . the stock performance shown on the graph below represents historical stock performance and is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance. .

12/9/2013: american airlines group inc .: 100
amex airline index: 100
s&p 500: 100
12/31/2013: american airlines group inc .: 103
amex airline index: 102
s&p 500: 102
12/31/2014: american airlines group inc .: 219
amex airline index: 152
s&p 500: 114
12/31/2015: american airlines group inc .: 175
amex airline index: 127
s&p 500: 113

purchases of equity securities by the issuer and affiliated purchasers since july 2014 , our board of directors has approved several share repurchase programs aggregating $ 7.0 billion of authority of which , as of december 31 , 2015 , $ 2.4 billion remained unused under repurchase programs .

Questions:
what was the change on the amex airline index from 2013 to 2014?
and how much does this change represent in relation to that amex airline index in 2013?

Answers:
50
49%
25feb201400255845 performance graph the following graph compares the performance of our common stock with that of the s&p 500 index and the s&p 500 healthcare equipment index . the cumulative total return listed below assumes an initial investment of $ 100 on december 31 , 2008 and reinvestment of dividends . comparison of five year cumulative total return 2008 2009 2010 2011 20132012 edwards lifesciences s&p 500 s&p 500 healthcare equipment december 31 .

2009: edwards lifesciences: 158.05
s&p 500: 126.46
s&p 500 healthcare equipment index: 120.83
2010: edwards lifesciences: 294.23
s&p 500: 145.51
s&p 500 healthcare equipment index: 117.02
2011: edwards lifesciences: 257.32
s&p 500: 148.59
s&p 500 healthcare equipment index: 123.37
2012: edwards lifesciences: 328.19
s&p 500: 172.37
s&p 500 healthcare equipment index: 145.84
2013: edwards lifesciences: 239.34
s&p 500: 228.19
s&p 500 healthcare equipment index: 186

.

Questions:
what is the net change in value of edwards lifesciences in 2013 less 100?
what is the percent change?

Answers:
139.34
139.34%
intel corporation notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) the aggregate fair value of awards that vested in 2015 was $ 1.5 billion ( $ 1.1 billion in 2014 and $ 1.0 billion in 2013 ) , which represents the market value of our common stock on the date that the rsus vested . the grant-date fair value of awards that vested in 2015 was $ 1.1 billion ( $ 949 million in 2014 and $ 899 million in 2013 ) . the number of rsus vested includes shares of common stock that we withheld on behalf of employees to satisfy the minimum statutory tax withholding requirements . rsus that are expected to vest are net of estimated future forfeitures . as of december 26 , 2015 , there was $ 1.8 billion in unrecognized compensation costs related to rsus granted under our equity incentive plans . we expect to recognize those costs over a weighted average period of 1.2 years . stock option awards as of december 26 , 2015 , options outstanding that have vested and are expected to vest were as follows : number of options ( in millions ) weighted average exercise weighted average remaining contractual ( in years ) aggregate intrinsic ( in millions ) .

number ofoptions ( in millions ): vested: 43.8
expected to vest: 9.6
total: 53.4
weightedaverageexerciseprice: vested: 21.07
expected to vest: 24.07
total: 21.61
weightedaverageremainingcontractualterm ( in years ): vested: 1.8
expected to vest: 4.1
total: 2.2
aggregateintrinsicvalue ( in millions ): vested: 609
expected to vest: 104
total: 713

aggregate intrinsic value represents the difference between the exercise price and $ 34.98 , the closing price of our common stock on december 24 , 2015 , as reported on the nasdaq global select market , for all in-the-money options outstanding . options outstanding that are expected to vest are net of estimated future option forfeitures . options with a fair value of $ 42 million completed vesting in 2015 ( $ 68 million in 2014 and $ 186 million in 2013 ) . as of december 26 , 2015 , there was $ 13 million in unrecognized compensation costs related to stock options granted under our equity incentive plans . we expect to recognize those costs over a weighted average period of approximately eight months. .

Questions:
as of december 26, 2015 , what were, in billions, the expected unrecognized compensation costs to be recognized per year?
and as of that same date, what percentage of the total stock option awards were expected to vest?

Answers:
1.5
18%
entergy arkansas , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis results of operations net income 2004 compared to 2003 net income increased $ 16.2 million due to lower other operation and maintenance expenses , a lower effective income tax rate for 2004 compared to 2003 , and lower interest charges . the increase was partially offset by lower net revenue . 2003 compared to 2002 net income decreased $ 9.6 million due to lower net revenue , higher depreciation and amortization expenses , and a higher effective income tax rate for 2003 compared to 2002 . the decrease was substantially offset by lower other operation and maintenance expenses , higher other income , and lower interest charges . net revenue 2004 compared to 2003 net revenue , which is entergy arkansas' measure of gross margin , consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related , and purchased power expenses and 2 ) other regulatory credits . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2004 to 2003. .

( in millions ): 2003 net revenue: 998.7
deferred fuel cost revisions: -16.9
other: -3.4
2004 net revenue: 978.4

deferred fuel cost revisions includes the difference between the estimated deferred fuel expense and the actual calculation of recoverable fuel expense , which occurs on an annual basis . deferred fuel cost revisions decreased net revenue due to a revised estimate of fuel costs filed for recovery at entergy arkansas in the march 2004 energy cost recovery rider , which reduced net revenue by $ 11.5 million . the remainder of the variance is due to the 2002 energy cost recovery true-up , made in the first quarter of 2003 , which increased net revenue in 2003 . gross operating revenues , fuel and purchased power expenses , and other regulatory credits gross operating revenues increased primarily due to : 2022 an increase of $ 20.7 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due to an increase in the energy cost recovery rider effective april 2004 ( fuel cost recovery revenues are discussed in note 2 to the domestic utility companies and system energy financial statements ) ; 2022 an increase of $ 15.5 million in grand gulf revenues due to an increase in the grand gulf rider effective january 2004 ; 2022 an increase of $ 13.9 million in gross wholesale revenue primarily due to increased sales to affiliated systems ; 2022 an increase of $ 9.5 million due to volume/weather primarily resulting from increased usage during the unbilled sales period , partially offset by the effect of milder weather on billed sales in 2004. .

Questions:
what was the net revenue in 2004 for entergy arkansas inc.?
and what was it in 2003?
by how much, then, did it change over the year?
and what is this change as a portion of the 2003 net revenue?
what was, again, the variation in that net revenue over the period?

Answers:
978.4
998.7
-20.3
-2.0%
-20.3
performance graph the following graph compares the yearly change in the cumulative total stockholder return for our last five full fiscal years , based upon the market price of our common stock , with the cumulative total return on a nasdaq composite index ( u.s . companies ) and a peer group , the nasdaq medical equipment-sic code 3840-3849 index , which is comprised of medical equipment companies , for that period . the performance graph assumes the investment of $ 100 on march 31 , 2006 in our common stock , the nasdaq composite index ( u.s . companies ) and the peer group index , and the reinvestment of any and all dividends. .

3/31/2006: abiomed inc: 100
nasdaq composite index: 100
nasdaq medical equipment sic code 3840-3849: 100
3/31/2007: abiomed inc: 105.89
nasdaq composite index: 103.5
nasdaq medical equipment sic code 3840-3849: 88.78
3/31/2008: abiomed inc: 101.86
nasdaq composite index: 97.41
nasdaq medical equipment sic code 3840-3849: 84.26
3/31/2009: abiomed inc: 37.98
nasdaq composite index: 65.33
nasdaq medical equipment sic code 3840-3849: 46.12
3/31/2010: abiomed inc: 80
nasdaq composite index: 102.49
nasdaq medical equipment sic code 3840-3849: 83.47
3/31/2011: abiomed inc: 112.64
nasdaq composite index: 118.86
nasdaq medical equipment sic code 3840-3849: 91.35

this graph is not 201csoliciting material 201d under regulation 14a or 14c of the rules promulgated under the securities exchange act of 1934 , is not deemed filed with the securities and exchange commission and is not to be incorporated by reference in any of our filings under the securities act of 1933 , as amended , or the exchange act whether made before or after the date hereof and irrespective of any general incorporation language in any such filing . transfer agent american stock transfer & trust company , 59 maiden lane , new york , ny 10038 , is our stock transfer agent. .

Questions:
what is the net change in value of abiomed inc from 2006 to 2009?
what is the percent change?

Answers:
-62.02
-62.0%
performance graph the performance graph below shows the five-year cumulative total stockholder return on applied common stock during the period from october 25 , 2009 through october 26 , 2014 . this is compared with the cumulative total return of the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index and the rdg semiconductor composite index over the same period . the comparison assumes $ 100 was invested on october 25 , 2009 in applied common stock and in each of the foregoing indices and assumes reinvestment of dividends , if any . dollar amounts in the graph are rounded to the nearest whole dollar . the performance shown in the graph represents past performance and should not be considered an indication of future performance . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among applied materials , inc. , the s&p 500 index 201cs&p 201d is a registered trademark of standard & poor 2019s financial services llc , a subsidiary of the mcgraw-hill companies , inc. .

10/25/2009: applied materials: 100
s&p 500 index: 100
rdg semiconductor composite index: 100
10/31/2010: applied materials: 97.43
s&p 500 index: 116.52
rdg semiconductor composite index: 121
10/30/2011: applied materials: 101.85
s&p 500 index: 125.94
rdg semiconductor composite index: 132.42
10/28/2012: applied materials: 88.54
s&p 500 index: 145.09
rdg semiconductor composite index: 124.95
10/27/2013: applied materials: 151.43
s&p 500 index: 184.52
rdg semiconductor composite index: 163.2
10/26/2014: applied materials: 183.29
s&p 500 index: 216.39
rdg semiconductor composite index: 207.93

dividends during fiscal 2014 , applied 2019s board of directors declared four quarterly cash dividends of $ 0.10 per share each . during fiscal 2013 , applied 2019s board of directors declared three quarterly cash dividends of $ 0.10 per share each and one quarterly cash dividend of $ 0.09 per share . during fiscal 2012 , applied 2019s board of directors declared three quarterly cash dividends of $ 0.09 per share each and one quarterly cash dividend of $ 0.08 . dividends declared during fiscal 2014 , 2013 and 2012 totaled $ 487 million , $ 469 million and $ 438 million , respectively . applied currently anticipates that it will continue to pay cash dividends on a quarterly basis in the future , although the declaration and amount of any future cash dividends are at the discretion of the board of directors and will depend on applied 2019s financial condition , results of operations , capital requirements , business conditions and other factors , as well as a determination that cash dividends are in the best interests of applied 2019s stockholders . $ 100 invested on 10/25/09 in stock or 10/31/09 in index , including reinvestment of dividends . indexes calculated on month-end basis . and the rdg semiconductor composite index 183145 97 102 121 132 10/25/09 10/31/10 10/30/11 10/28/12 10/27/13 10/26/14 applied materials , inc . s&p 500 rdg semiconductor composite .

Questions:
what was the price of applied materials as of 10/28/12?
and the change in price between then and the original investment?
so what was the return on this investment?

Answers:
88.54
-11.46
11.5%
loan commitments ( unfunded loans and unused lines of credit ) , asset purchase agreements , standby letters of credit and letters of credit are issued to accommodate the financing needs of state street 2019s clients and to provide credit enhancements to special purpose entities . loan commitments are agreements by state street to lend monies at a future date . asset purchase agreements are commitments to purchase receivables or securities , subject to conditions established in the agreements , and at december 31 , 2001 , include $ 8.0 billion outstanding to special purpose entities . standby letters of credit and letters of credit commit state street to make payments on behalf of clients and special purpose entities when certain specified events occur . standby letters of credit outstanding to special purpose entities were $ 608 million at december 31 , 2001 . these loan , asset purchase and letter of credit commitments are subject to the same credit policies and reviews as loans . the amount and nature of collateral are obtained based upon management 2019s assessment of the credit risk . approximately 89% ( 89 % ) of the loan commitments and asset purchase agreements expire within one year from the date of issue . sincemany of the commitments are expected to expire or renewwithout being drawn , the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements . the following is a summary of the contractual amount of credit-related , off-balance sheet financial instruments at december 31: .

2001: indemnified securities on loan: 113047
loan commitments: 12962
asset purchase agreements: 10366
standby letters of credit: 3918
letters of credit: 164
2000: indemnified securities on loan: 101438
loan commitments: 11367
asset purchase agreements: 7112
standby letters of credit: 4028
letters of credit: 218

state street corporation 53 .

Questions:
what was the change in indemnified securities on loan increase from 2000 to 2001?
and how much does this change represent in relation to those indemnified securities in 2000, in percentage?

Answers:
11609
.1144