sharick008/convfinqa huggingface dataset:
five-year performance comparison 2013 the following graph provides an indicator of cumulative total shareholder returns for the corporation as compared to the peer group index ( described above ) , the dow jones , and the s&p 500 . the graph assumes that the value of the investment in the common stock of union pacific corporation and each index was $ 100 on december 31 , 2002 , and that all dividends were reinvested . comparison of five-year cumulative return 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 upc s&p 500 peer group dj trans purchases of equity securities 2013 during 2007 , we repurchased 13266070 shares of our common stock at an average price of $ 115.66 . during the first nine months of 2007 , we repurchased 10639916 shares of our common stock at an average price per share of $ 112.68 . the following table presents common stock repurchases during each month for the fourth quarter of 2007 : period number of shares purchased average paid per total number of shares purchased as part of a publicly announced plan or program maximum number of shares that may yet be purchased under the plan or program .

totalnumber ofsharespurchased[a]: oct . 1 through oct . 31: 99782
nov . 1 through nov . 30: 540294
dec . 1 through dec . 31: 1986078
total: 2626154
averagepricepaid pershare: oct . 1 through oct . 31: 128.78
nov . 1 through nov . 30: 124.7
dec . 1 through dec . 31: 128.53
total: 127.75
total number of sharespurchased as part of apublicly announcedplan orprogram: oct . 1 through oct . 31: -
nov . 1 through nov . 30: 528000
dec . 1 through dec . 31: 1869800
total: 2397800
maximum number ofshares that may yetbe purchased underthe plan orprogram[b]: oct . 1 through oct . 31: 9774279
nov . 1 through nov . 30: 9246279
dec . 1 through dec . 31: 7376479
total: n/a

[a] total number of shares purchased during the quarter includes 228354 shares delivered or attested to upc by employees to pay stock option exercise prices , satisfy excess tax withholding obligations for stock option exercises or vesting of retention units , and pay withholding obligations for vesting of retention shares . [b] on january 30 , 2007 , our board of directors authorized us to repurchase up to 20 million shares of our common stock through december 31 , 2009 . we may make these repurchases on the open market or through other transactions . our management has sole discretion with respect to determining the timing and amount of these transactions. .

Questions:
what was the number of shares purchased in november of 2007?
and what was that number for the entire last quarter of that year?
what percentage, then, of this last quarter does november represent?
and what percentage of it do the shares attested to upc by employees to pay stock option exercise prices do?

Answers:
540294
2626154
21%
8.7%
10-k altria ar release tuesday , february 27 , 2018 10:00pm andra design llc performance stock units : in january 2017 , altria group , inc . granted an aggregate of 187886 performance stock units to eligible employees . the payout of the performance stock units requires the achievement of certain performance measures , which were predetermined at the time of grant , over a three-year performance cycle . these performance measures consist of altria group , inc . 2019s adjusted diluted earnings per share ( 201ceps 201d ) compounded annual growth rate and altria group , inc . 2019s total shareholder return relative to a predetermined peer group . the performance stock units are also subject to forfeiture if certain employment conditions are not met . at december 31 , 2017 , altria group , inc . had 170755 performance stock units remaining , with a weighted-average grant date fair value of $ 70.39 per performance stock unit . the fair value of the performance stock units at the date of grant , net of estimated forfeitures , is amortized to expense over the performance period . altria group , inc . recorded pre-tax compensation expense related to performance stock units for the year ended december 31 , 2017 of $ 6 million . the unamortized compensation expense related to altria group , inc . 2019s performance stock units was $ 7 million at december 31 , 2017 . altria group , inc . did not grant any performance stock units during 2016 and 2015 . note 12 . earnings per share basic and diluted eps were calculated using the following: .

for the years ended december 31 , 2017: net earnings attributable to altria group inc .: 10222
less : distributed and undistributed earnings attributable to share-based awards: -14
earnings for basic and diluted eps: 10208
weighted-average shares for basic and diluted eps: 1921
for the years ended december 31 , 2016: net earnings attributable to altria group inc .: 14239
less : distributed and undistributed earnings attributable to share-based awards: -24
earnings for basic and diluted eps: 14215
weighted-average shares for basic and diluted eps: 1952
for the years ended december 31 , 2015: net earnings attributable to altria group inc .: 5241
less : distributed and undistributed earnings attributable to share-based awards: -10
earnings for basic and diluted eps: 5231
weighted-average shares for basic and diluted eps: 1961

net earnings attributable to altria group , inc . $ 10222 $ 14239 $ 5241 less : distributed and undistributed earnings attributable to share-based awards ( 14 ) ( 24 ) ( 10 ) earnings for basic and diluted eps $ 10208 $ 14215 $ 5231 weighted-average shares for basic and diluted eps 1921 1952 1961 .

Questions:
what was the net change in value in earnings attributable to altria group from 2015 to 2016?
what was the value in 2015?
what is the percent change?

Answers:
8998
5241
171.7%
dividends for a summary of the cash dividends paid on citi 2019s outstanding common stock during 2009 and 2010 , see note 33 to the consolidated financial statements . for so long as the u.s . government holds any citigroup trust preferred securities acquired pursuant to the exchange offers consummated in 2009 , citigroup has agreed not to pay a quarterly common stock dividend exceeding $ 0.01 per quarter , subject to certain customary exceptions . further , any dividend on citi 2019s outstanding common stock would need to be made in compliance with citi 2019s obligations to any remaining outstanding citigroup preferred stock . performance graph comparison of five-year cumulative total return the following graph and table compare the cumulative total return on citigroup 2019s common stock with the cumulative total return of the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index over the five-year period extending through december 31 , 2010 . the graph and table assume that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2005 in citigroup 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index and that all dividends were reinvested . citigroup s&p 500 index s&p financial index comparison of five-year cumulative total return for the years ended 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 .

citigroup: 2006: 119.55
2007: 66.1
2008: 15.88
2009: 7.85
2010: 11.22
s&p 500 index: 2006: 115.79
2007: 122.15
2008: 76.96
2009: 97.33
2010: 111.99
s&p financial index: 2006: 119.19
2007: 96.98
2008: 43.34
2009: 50.8
2010: 56.96

.

Questions:
what is the difference between the value of citigroup in 2010 and the original value invested in it, in 2005?
what was, then, the return in relation to this original value, in percentage?
what is the difference between the value of citigroup in 2010 and the original value invested in it, in 2005?
and what was, then, the return in relation to this original value, in percentage?
what is the difference between the return of the citigroup stock and the one of the s&p 500 index?

Answers:
-88.78
-88.78%
-43.04
-43.04%
-45.38
shareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the securities and exchange commission , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates such information by reference into such filing . the following graph shows a five year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 index , and the dow jones transportation average . the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2005 in the standard & poor 2019s 500 index , the dow jones transportation average , and our class b common stock . comparison of five year cumulative total return $ 40.00 $ 60.00 $ 80.00 $ 100.00 $ 120.00 $ 140.00 $ 160.00 201020092008200720062005 s&p 500 ups dj transport .

12/31/05: united parcel service inc .: 100
standard & poor 2019s 500 index: 100
dow jones transportation average: 100
12/31/06: united parcel service inc .: 101.76
standard & poor 2019s 500 index: 115.79
dow jones transportation average: 109.82
12/31/07: united parcel service inc .: 98.2
standard & poor 2019s 500 index: 122.16
dow jones transportation average: 111.38
12/31/08: united parcel service inc .: 78.76
standard & poor 2019s 500 index: 76.96
dow jones transportation average: 87.52
12/31/09: united parcel service inc .: 84.87
standard & poor 2019s 500 index: 97.33
dow jones transportation average: 103.79
12/31/10: united parcel service inc .: 110.57
standard & poor 2019s 500 index: 111.99
dow jones transportation average: 131.59

.

Questions:
what is the value of an investment in ups in 2010?
what is the change in the value from 2005 to 2010?
what growth rate does this represent?

Answers:
110.57
10.57
10.57%
stock performance graph the following graph sets forth the cumulative total shareholder return on our series a common stock , series b common stock and series c common stock as compared with the cumulative total return of the companies listed in the standard and poor 2019s 500 stock index ( 201cs&p 500 index 201d ) and a peer group of companies comprised of cbs corporation class b common stock , news corporation class a common stock , scripps network interactive , inc. , time warner , inc. , viacom , inc . class b common stock and the walt disney company . the graph assumes $ 100 originally invested on september 18 , 2008 , the date upon which our common stock began trading , in each of our series a common stock , series b common stock and series c common stock , the s&p 500 index , and the stock of our peer group companies , including reinvestment of dividends , for the period september 18 , 2008 through december 31 , 2008 and the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2010 , 2011 , and 2012 . december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 .

december 312008: disca: 102.53
discb: 78.53
disck: 83.69
s&p 500: 74.86
peer group: 68.79
december 312009: disca: 222.09
discb: 162.82
disck: 165.75
s&p 500: 92.42
peer group: 100.7
december 312010: disca: 301.96
discb: 225.95
disck: 229.31
s&p 500: 104.24
peer group: 121.35
december 312011: disca: 296.67
discb: 217.56
disck: 235.63
s&p 500: 104.23
peer group: 138.19
december 312012: disca: 459.67
discb: 327.11
disck: 365.63
s&p 500: 118.21
peer group: 190.58

equity compensation plan information information regarding securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans will be set forth in our definitive proxy statement for our 2013 annual meeting of stockholders under the caption 201csecurities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans , 201d which is incorporated herein by reference. .

Questions:
what was the value of discb in 2012?
and what was the change in value of that stock considering the original amount invested in it in 2008?
how much does this change represent in relation to the original amount that was invested, in percentage?

Answers:
327.11
227.11
227.11%
notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) the following table summarizes the changes in non-vested restricted stock awards for the year ended may 31 , 2009 ( share awards in thousands ) : share awards weighted average grant-date fair value .

share awards: non-vested at may 31 2007: 278
granted: 430
vested: -159
forfeited: -27
non-vested at may 31 2008: 518
non-vested at may 31 2009: 762
weighted average grant-date fair value: non-vested at may 31 2007: 37
granted: 43
vested: 39
forfeited: 41
non-vested at may 31 2008: 39
non-vested at may 31 2009: 42

the weighted average grant-date fair value of share awards granted in the years ended may 31 , 2008 and 2007 was $ 38 and $ 45 , respectively . the total fair value of share awards vested during the years ended may 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 was $ 6.2 million , $ 4.1 million and $ 1.7 million , respectively . we recognized compensation expense for restricted stock of $ 9.0 million , $ 5.7 million , and $ 2.7 million in the years ended may 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 . as of may 31 , 2009 , there was $ 23.5 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested restricted stock awards that is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.9 years . employee stock purchase plan we have an employee stock purchase plan under which the sale of 2.4 million shares of our common stock has been authorized . employees may designate up to the lesser of $ 25000 or 20% ( 20 % ) of their annual compensation for the purchase of stock . the price for shares purchased under the plan is 85% ( 85 % ) of the market value on the last day of the quarterly purchase period . as of may 31 , 2009 , 0.8 million shares had been issued under this plan , with 1.6 million shares reserved for future issuance . the weighted average grant-date fair value of each designated share purchased under this plan was $ 6 , $ 6 and $ 8 in the years ended may 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively . these values represent the fair value of the 15% ( 15 % ) discount . note 12 2014segment information general information during fiscal 2009 , we began assessing our operating performance using a new segment structure . we made this change as a result of our june 30 , 2008 acquisition of 51% ( 51 % ) of hsbc merchant services llp in the united kingdom , in addition to anticipated future international expansion . beginning with the quarter ended august 31 , 2008 , the reportable segments are defined as north america merchant services , international merchant services , and money transfer . the following tables reflect these changes and such reportable segments for fiscal years 2009 , 2008 , and 2007. .

Questions:
what was the value of non-vested shares as of 5/31/08?
and converted to the tens place?

Answers:
20202
20.2
stockholder return performance graph the following graph compares the cumulative 5-year total stockholder return on our common stock relative to the cumulative total return of the nasdaq composite index and the s&p 400 information technology index . the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock and in each index on december 31 , 2011 ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 and tracks it each year thereafter on the last day of our fiscal year through december 31 , 2016 and , for each index , on the last day of the calendar year . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among cadence design systems , inc. , the nasdaq composite index , and s&p 400 information technology cadence design systems , inc . nasdaq composite s&p 400 information technology 12/31/1612/28/13 1/2/1612/31/11 1/3/1512/29/12 *$ 100 invested on 12/31/11 in stock or index , including reinvestment of dividends . indexes calculated on month-end basis . copyright a9 2017 standard & poor 2019s , a division of s&p global . all rights reserved. .

12/31/2011: cadence design systems inc .: 100
nasdaq composite: 100
s&p 400 information technology: 100
12/29/2012: cadence design systems inc .: 129.23
nasdaq composite: 116.41
s&p 400 information technology: 118.41
12/28/2013: cadence design systems inc .: 133.94
nasdaq composite: 165.47
s&p 400 information technology: 165.38
1/3/2015: cadence design systems inc .: 181.06
nasdaq composite: 188.69
s&p 400 information technology: 170.5
1/2/2016: cadence design systems inc .: 200.1
nasdaq composite: 200.32
s&p 400 information technology: 178.74
12/31/2016: cadence design systems inc .: 242.5
nasdaq composite: 216.54
s&p 400 information technology: 219.65

the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance. .

Questions:
what was the price of cadence design systems inc. as of 1/2/16?
and as of 1/3/15?
so what was the difference in price between these two dates?
and the specific price as of 1/3/15 again?
so what was the rate of return for this investment during this time?

Answers:
200.10
181.06
19.04
181.06
10.5%
entergy new orleans , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis results of operations net income ( loss ) 2004 compared to 2003 net income increased $ 20.2 million primarily due to higher net revenue . 2003 compared to 2002 entergy new orleans had net income of $ 7.9 million in 2003 compared to a net loss in 2002 . the increase was due to higher net revenue and lower interest expense , partially offset by higher other operation and maintenance expenses and depreciation and amortization expenses . net revenue 2004 compared to 2003 net revenue , which is entergy new orleans' measure of gross margin , consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related , and purchased power expenses and 2 ) other regulatory credits . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2004 to 2003. .

( in millions ): 2003 net revenue: 208.3
base rates: 10.6
volume/weather: 8.3
2004 deferrals: 7.5
price applied to unbilled electric sales: 3.7
other: 0.6
2004 net revenue: 239

the increase in base rates was effective june 2003 . the rate increase is discussed in note 2 to the domestic utility companies and system energy financial statements . the volume/weather variance is primarily due to increased billed electric usage of 162 gwh in the industrial service sector . the increase was partially offset by milder weather in the residential and commercial sectors . the 2004 deferrals variance is due to the deferral of voluntary severance plan and fossil plant maintenance expenses in accordance with a stipulation approved by the city council in august 2004 . the stipulation allows for the recovery of these costs through amortization of a regulatory asset . the voluntary severance plan and fossil plant maintenance expenses are being amortized over a five-year period that became effective january 2004 and january 2003 , respectively . the formula rate plan is discussed in note 2 to the domestic utility companies and system energy financial statements . the price applied to unbilled electric sales variance is due to an increase in the fuel price applied to unbilled sales. .

Questions:
what was net revenues at the end of 2004?
what were they at the end of 2003?
what was the change in revenue?
what was the 2003 number?
what is the percent change?

Answers:
239.0
208.3
30.7
208.3
14.7%
state street corporation | 52 shareholder return performance presentation the graph presented below compares the cumulative total shareholder return on state street's common stock to the cumulative total return of the s&p 500 index , the s&p financial index and the kbw bank index over a five-year period . the cumulative total shareholder return assumes the investment of $ 100 in state street common stock and in each index on december 31 , 2012 . it also assumes reinvestment of common stock dividends . the s&p financial index is a publicly available , capitalization-weighted index , comprised of 67 of the standard & poor 2019s 500 companies , representing 27 diversified financial services companies , 23 insurance companies , and 17 banking companies . the kbw bank index is a modified cap-weighted index consisting of 24 exchange-listed stocks , representing national money center banks and leading regional institutions. .

2012: state street corporation: 100
s&p 500 index: 100
s&p financial index: 100
kbw bank index: 100
2013: state street corporation: 159
s&p 500 index: 132
s&p financial index: 136
kbw bank index: 138
2014: state street corporation: 172
s&p 500 index: 151
s&p financial index: 156
kbw bank index: 151
2015: state street corporation: 148
s&p 500 index: 153
s&p financial index: 154
kbw bank index: 151
2016: state street corporation: 178
s&p 500 index: 171
s&p financial index: 189
kbw bank index: 195
2017: state street corporation: 227
s&p 500 index: 208
s&p financial index: 230
kbw bank index: 231

.

Questions:
what was the value of the s&p500 index in 2015?
and what was the original amount invested in it in 2012?
what was, then, the change in the value of the stock from 2012 to 2015?
what was the original amount invested in the stock in 2012?
and how much does that change represent in relation to this original amount?

Answers:
153
100
53
100
53%
note 9 2014 benefit plans the company has defined benefit pension plans covering certain employees in the united states and certain international locations . postretirement healthcare and life insurance benefits provided to qualifying domestic retirees as well as other postretirement benefit plans in international countries are not material . the measurement date used for the company 2019s employee benefit plans is september 30 . effective january 1 , 2018 , the legacy u.s . pension plan was frozen to limit the participation of employees who are hired or re-hired by the company , or who transfer employment to the company , on or after january 1 , net pension cost for the years ended september 30 included the following components: .

pension plans 2019: service cost: 134
interest cost: 107
expected return on plan assets: -180
amortization of prior service credit: -13
amortization of loss: 78
settlements: 10
net pension cost: 135
net pension cost included in the preceding table that is attributable to international plans: 32
pension plans 2018: service cost: 136
interest cost: 90
expected return on plan assets: -154
amortization of prior service credit: -13
amortization of loss: 78
settlements: 2
net pension cost: 137
net pension cost included in the preceding table that is attributable to international plans: 34
pension plans 2017: service cost: 110
interest cost: 61
expected return on plan assets: -112
amortization of prior service credit: -14
amortization of loss: 92
settlements: 2014
net pension cost: 138
net pension cost included in the preceding table that is attributable to international plans: 43

net pension cost included in the preceding table that is attributable to international plans $ 32 $ 34 $ 43 the amounts provided above for amortization of prior service credit and amortization of loss represent the reclassifications of prior service credits and net actuarial losses that were recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) in prior periods . the settlement losses recorded in 2019 and 2018 primarily included lump sum benefit payments associated with the company 2019s u.s . supplemental pension plan . the company recognizes pension settlements when payments from the supplemental plan exceed the sum of service and interest cost components of net periodic pension cost associated with this plan for the fiscal year . as further discussed in note 2 , upon adopting an accounting standard update on october 1 , 2018 , all components of the company 2019s net periodic pension and postretirement benefit costs , aside from service cost , are recorded to other income ( expense ) , net on its consolidated statements of income , for all periods presented . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) becton , dickinson and company .

Questions:
what is the pension cost for 2019?
what is it for 2018?
what is the sum?
what is the total sum including 2017?
what is the average cost per year?

Answers:
135
137
272
410
136.67