sharick008/convfinqa huggingface dataset:
backlog applied manufactures systems to meet demand represented by order backlog and customer commitments . backlog consists of : ( 1 ) orders for which written authorizations have been accepted and assigned shipment dates are within the next 12 months , or shipment has occurred but revenue has not been recognized ; and ( 2 ) contractual service revenue and maintenance fees to be earned within the next 12 months . backlog by reportable segment as of october 25 , 2015 and october 26 , 2014 was as follows : 2015 2014 ( in millions , except percentages ) .

2015: silicon systems: 1720
applied global services: 812
display: 525
energy and environmental solutions: 85
total: 3142
2014: silicon systems: -55
applied global services: -26
display: -16
energy and environmental solutions: -3
total: -100
 (2): silicon systems: 1400
applied global services: 775
display: 593
energy and environmental solutions: 149
total: 2917
( in millions except percentages ): silicon systems: -48
applied global services: -27
display: -20
energy and environmental solutions: -5
total: -100

applied 2019s backlog on any particular date is not necessarily indicative of actual sales for any future periods , due to the potential for customer changes in delivery schedules or order cancellations . customers may delay delivery of products or cancel orders prior to shipment , subject to possible cancellation penalties . delays in delivery schedules or a reduction of backlog during any particular period could have a material adverse effect on applied 2019s business and results of operations . manufacturing , raw materials and supplies applied 2019s manufacturing activities consist primarily of assembly , test and integration of various proprietary and commercial parts , components and subassemblies that are used to manufacture systems . applied has implemented a distributed manufacturing model under which manufacturing and supply chain activities are conducted in various countries , including germany , israel , italy , singapore , taiwan , the united states and other countries in asia . applied uses numerous vendors , including contract manufacturers , to supply parts and assembly services for the manufacture and support of its products , including some systems being completed at customer sites . although applied makes reasonable efforts to assure that parts are available from multiple qualified suppliers , this is not always possible . accordingly , some key parts may be obtained from only a single supplier or a limited group of suppliers . applied seeks to reduce costs and to lower the risks of manufacturing and service interruptions by selecting and qualifying alternate suppliers for key parts ; monitoring the financial condition of key suppliers ; maintaining appropriate inventories of key parts ; qualifying new parts on a timely basis ; and ensuring quality and performance of parts. .

Questions:
what was the display value in 2015?
what was the 2014 value?
what is the net change?
what is that change over the 2014 value?

Answers:
525
593
-68
-11.5%
december 18 , 2007 , we issued an additional 23182197 shares of common stock to citadel . the issuances were exempt from registration pursuant to section 4 ( 2 ) of the securities act of 1933 , and each purchaser has represented to us that it is an 201caccredited investor 201d as defined in regulation d promulgated under the securities act of 1933 , and that the common stock was being acquired for investment . we did not engage in a general solicitation or advertising with regard to the issuances of the common stock and have not offered securities to the public in connection with the issuances . see item 1 . business 2014citadel investment . performance graph the following performance graph shows the cumulative total return to a holder of the company 2019s common stock , assuming dividend reinvestment , compared with the cumulative total return , assuming dividend reinvestment , of the standard & poor 2019s ( 201cs&p 201d ) 500 and the s&p super cap diversified financials during the period from december 31 , 2002 through december 31 , 2007. .

12/02: e*trade financial corporation: 100
s&p 500: 100
s&p super cap diversified financials: 100
12/03: e*trade financial corporation: 260.29
s&p 500: 128.68
s&p super cap diversified financials: 139.29
12/04: e*trade financial corporation: 307.61
s&p 500: 142.69
s&p super cap diversified financials: 156.28
12/05: e*trade financial corporation: 429.22
s&p 500: 149.7
s&p super cap diversified financials: 170.89
12/06: e*trade financial corporation: 461.32
s&p 500: 173.34
s&p super cap diversified financials: 211.13
12/07: e*trade financial corporation: 73.05
s&p 500: 182.87
s&p super cap diversified financials: 176.62

2022 $ 100 invested on 12/31/02 in stock or index-including reinvestment of dividends . fiscal year ending december 31 . 2022 copyright a9 2008 , standard & poor 2019s , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies , inc . all rights reserved . www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm .

Questions:
what was the value of e*trade financial corp for year ended 12/07?
what is that less an assumed $100 initial investment?
what is that divided by 100?

Answers:
73.05
-26.95
-26.95%
jpmorgan chase & co./2015 annual report 67 five-year stock performance the following table and graph compare the five-year cumulative total return for jpmorgan chase & co . ( 201cjpmorgan chase 201d or the 201cfirm 201d ) common stock with the cumulative return of the s&p 500 index , the kbw bank index and the s&p financial index . the s&p 500 index is a commonly referenced united states of america ( 201cu.s . 201d ) equity benchmark consisting of leading companies from different economic sectors . the kbw bank index seeks to reflect the performance of banks and thrifts that are publicly traded in the u.s . and is composed of 24 leading national money center and regional banks and thrifts . the s&p financial index is an index of 87 financial companies , all of which are components of the s&p 500 . the firm is a component of all three industry indices . the following table and graph assume simultaneous investments of $ 100 on december 31 , 2010 , in jpmorgan chase common stock and in each of the above indices . the comparison assumes that all dividends are reinvested . december 31 , ( in dollars ) 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 .

2010: jpmorgan chase: 100
kbw bank index: 100
s&p financial index: 100
s&p 500 index: 100
2011: jpmorgan chase: 80.03
kbw bank index: 76.82
s&p financial index: 82.94
s&p 500 index: 102.11
2012: jpmorgan chase: 108.98
kbw bank index: 102.19
s&p financial index: 106.78
s&p 500 index: 118.44
2013: jpmorgan chase: 148.98
kbw bank index: 140.77
s&p financial index: 144.79
s&p 500 index: 156.78
2014: jpmorgan chase: 163.71
kbw bank index: 153.96
s&p financial index: 166.76
s&p 500 index: 178.22
2015: jpmorgan chase: 177.4
kbw bank index: 154.71
s&p financial index: 164.15
s&p 500 index: 180.67

december 31 , ( in dollars ) .

Questions:
what is the change in value of the s&p from 2010 to 2015?
assuming an initial investment of $100, what was the percent change?

Answers:
80.67
80.67%
the graph below shows a five-year comparison of the cumulative shareholder return on the company's common stock with the cumulative total return of the s&p smallcap 600 index and the s&p 600 electrical equipment index , all of which are published indices . comparison of five-year cumulative total return from december 31 , 2002 to december 31 , 2007 assumes $ 100 invested with reinvestment of dividends period indexed returns .

baseperiod 12/31/02: a o smith corp: 100
s&p smallcap 600 index: 100
s&p 600 electrical equipment: 100
baseperiod 12/31/03: a o smith corp: 132.23
s&p smallcap 600 index: 138.79
s&p 600 electrical equipment: 126.12
baseperiod 12/31/04: a o smith corp: 115.36
s&p smallcap 600 index: 170.22
s&p 600 electrical equipment: 152.18
baseperiod 12/31/05: a o smith corp: 138.2
s&p smallcap 600 index: 183.3
s&p 600 electrical equipment: 169.07
baseperiod 12/31/06: a o smith corp: 150.26
s&p smallcap 600 index: 211.01
s&p 600 electrical equipment: 228.83
12/31/07: a o smith corp: 142.72
s&p smallcap 600 index: 210.39
s&p 600 electrical equipment: 253.33

12/31/02 12/31/03 12/31/04 12/31/05 12/31/06 12/31/07 smith ( a o ) corp s&p smallcap 600 index s&p 600 electrical equipment .

Questions:
what was the change in the value of a o smith corp from 2002 to 2007?
and how much does that change represent in relation to the original value in 2002?
what was the value of the s&p 600 electrical equipment in 2007?
and what was the change in that value between 2002 and 2007?
how much, then, does this change represent in relation to the original value of that stock in 2002?
and what was the difference between the return (or the change representation) of the a o smith corp and the one of the s&p 600 electrical equipment?

Answers:
42.72
42.72%
253.33
153.33
153.33%
-110.61%
entergy louisiana , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis setting any of entergy louisiana's rates . therefore , to the extent entergy louisiana's use of the proceeds would ordinarily have reduced its rate base , no change in rate base shall be reflected for ratemaking purposes . the sec approval for additional return of equity capital is now expired . entergy louisiana's receivables from or ( payables to ) the money pool were as follows as of december 31 for each of the following years: .

2003: ( in thousands ): ( in thousands )
$ 40549: -41317
2002: ( in thousands ): ( in thousands )
$ 40549: 18854
2001: ( in thousands ): ( in thousands )
$ 40549: 3812

money pool activity used $ 81.9 million of entergy louisiana's operating cash flow in 2004 , provided $ 60.2 million in 2003 , and used $ 15.0 million in 2002 . see note 4 to the domestic utility companies and system energy financial statements for a description of the money pool . investing activities the decrease of $ 25.1 million in net cash used by investing activities in 2004 was primarily due to decreased spending on customer service projects , partially offset by increases in spending on transmission projects and fossil plant projects . the increase of $ 56.0 million in net cash used by investing activities in 2003 was primarily due to increased spending on customer service , transmission , and nuclear projects . financing activities the decrease of $ 404.4 million in net cash used by financing activities in 2004 was primarily due to : 2022 the net issuance of $ 98.0 million of long-term debt in 2004 compared to the retirement of $ 261.0 million in 2022 a principal payment of $ 14.8 million in 2004 for the waterford lease obligation compared to a principal payment of $ 35.4 million in 2003 ; and 2022 a decrease of $ 29.0 million in common stock dividends paid . the decrease of $ 105.5 million in net cash used by financing activities in 2003 was primarily due to : 2022 a decrease of $ 125.9 million in common stock dividends paid ; and 2022 the repurchase of $ 120 million of common stock from entergy corporation in 2002 . the decrease in net cash used in 2003 was partially offset by the following : 2022 the retirement in 2003 of $ 150 million of 8.5% ( 8.5 % ) series first mortgage bonds compared to the net retirement of $ 134.6 million of first mortgage bonds in 2002 ; and 2022 principal payments of $ 35.4 million in 2003 for the waterford 3 lease obligation compared to principal payments of $ 15.9 million in 2002 . see note 5 to the domestic utility companies and system energy financial statements for details of long-term debt . uses of capital entergy louisiana requires capital resources for : 2022 construction and other capital investments ; 2022 debt and preferred stock maturities ; 2022 working capital purposes , including the financing of fuel and purchased power costs ; and 2022 dividend and interest payments. .

Questions:
what was the difference in receivables from between 2001 and 2002?
and the percentage change?

Answers:
15042
395%
10-k altria ar release tuesday , february 27 , 2018 10:00pm andra design llc performance stock units : in january 2017 , altria group , inc . granted an aggregate of 187886 performance stock units to eligible employees . the payout of the performance stock units requires the achievement of certain performance measures , which were predetermined at the time of grant , over a three-year performance cycle . these performance measures consist of altria group , inc . 2019s adjusted diluted earnings per share ( 201ceps 201d ) compounded annual growth rate and altria group , inc . 2019s total shareholder return relative to a predetermined peer group . the performance stock units are also subject to forfeiture if certain employment conditions are not met . at december 31 , 2017 , altria group , inc . had 170755 performance stock units remaining , with a weighted-average grant date fair value of $ 70.39 per performance stock unit . the fair value of the performance stock units at the date of grant , net of estimated forfeitures , is amortized to expense over the performance period . altria group , inc . recorded pre-tax compensation expense related to performance stock units for the year ended december 31 , 2017 of $ 6 million . the unamortized compensation expense related to altria group , inc . 2019s performance stock units was $ 7 million at december 31 , 2017 . altria group , inc . did not grant any performance stock units during 2016 and 2015 . note 12 . earnings per share basic and diluted eps were calculated using the following: .

for the years ended december 31 , 2017: net earnings attributable to altria group inc .: 10222
less : distributed and undistributed earnings attributable to share-based awards: -14
earnings for basic and diluted eps: 10208
weighted-average shares for basic and diluted eps: 1921
for the years ended december 31 , 2016: net earnings attributable to altria group inc .: 14239
less : distributed and undistributed earnings attributable to share-based awards: -24
earnings for basic and diluted eps: 14215
weighted-average shares for basic and diluted eps: 1952
for the years ended december 31 , 2015: net earnings attributable to altria group inc .: 5241
less : distributed and undistributed earnings attributable to share-based awards: -10
earnings for basic and diluted eps: 5231
weighted-average shares for basic and diluted eps: 1961

net earnings attributable to altria group , inc . $ 10222 $ 14239 $ 5241 less : distributed and undistributed earnings attributable to share-based awards ( 14 ) ( 24 ) ( 10 ) earnings for basic and diluted eps $ 10208 $ 14215 $ 5231 weighted-average shares for basic and diluted eps 1921 1952 1961 .

Questions:
what is the net change in earnings attributable to altria group from 2016 to 2017?
what is the 2016 value?
what is the percent change?

Answers:
-4017
14239
-28.2%
performance graph the following graph compares the total return , assuming reinvestment of dividends , on an investment in the company , based on performance of the company's common stock , with the total return of the standard & poor's 500 composite stock index and the dow jones united states travel and leisure index for a five year period by measuring the changes in common stock prices from december 31 , 2011 to december 31 , 2016. .

12/11: royal caribbean cruises ltd .: 100
s&p 500: 100
dow jones us travel & leisure: 100
12/12: royal caribbean cruises ltd .: 139.36
s&p 500: 116
dow jones us travel & leisure: 113.33
12/13: royal caribbean cruises ltd .: 198.03
s&p 500: 153.58
dow jones us travel & leisure: 164.87
12/14: royal caribbean cruises ltd .: 350.4
s&p 500: 174.6
dow jones us travel & leisure: 191.85
12/15: royal caribbean cruises ltd .: 437.09
s&p 500: 177.01
dow jones us travel & leisure: 203.17
12/16: royal caribbean cruises ltd .: 362.38
s&p 500: 198.18
dow jones us travel & leisure: 218.56

the stock performance graph assumes for comparison that the value of the company's common stock and of each index was $ 100 on december 31 , 2011 and that all dividends were reinvested . past performance is not necessarily an indicator of future results. .

Questions:
what was the value of the royal caribbean cruises ltd . in 2013?
and what was it in 2012?
what was, then, the change in its value over the year?
and how much does this change represent in relation to the value in 2012, in percentage?

Answers:
198.03
139.36
58.67
42.1%
shareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the sec , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates such information by reference into such filing . the following graph shows a five year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 index , and the dow jones transportation average . the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2009 in the standard & poor 2019s 500 index , the dow jones transportation average , and our class b common stock. .

12/31/2009: united parcel service inc .: 100
standard & poor 2019s 500 index: 100
dow jones transportation average: 100
12/31/2010: united parcel service inc .: 130.29
standard & poor 2019s 500 index: 115.06
dow jones transportation average: 126.74
12/31/2011: united parcel service inc .: 135.35
standard & poor 2019s 500 index: 117.48
dow jones transportation average: 126.75
12/31/2012: united parcel service inc .: 140.54
standard & poor 2019s 500 index: 136.26
dow jones transportation average: 136.24
12/31/2013: united parcel service inc .: 205.95
standard & poor 2019s 500 index: 180.38
dow jones transportation average: 192.61
12/31/2014: united parcel service inc .: 223.79
standard & poor 2019s 500 index: 205.05
dow jones transportation average: 240.91

.

Questions:
what is the difference in the ups price in 2014 less 100?
what is that value divided by 100?
what was the value of the s&p price in 2014?
what is that value less 100?
now, what is that number divided by 100?
what is the difference between the 2 quotients?

Answers:
123.79
123.79%
205.05
105.05
105.05%
18.74%
2022 the ability to identify suitable acquisition candidates and the ability to finance such acquisitions , which depends upon the availability of adequate cash reserves from operations or of acceptable financing terms and the variability of our stock price ; 2022 our ability to integrate any acquired business 2019 operations , services , clients , and personnel ; 2022 the effect of our substantial leverage , which may limit the funds available to make acquisitions and invest in our business ; 2022 changes in , or the failure to comply with , government regulations , including privacy regulations ; and 2022 other risks detailed elsewhere in this risk factors section and in our other filings with the securities and exchange commission . we are not under any obligation ( and expressly disclaim any such obligation ) to update or alter our forward- looking statements , whether as a result of new information , future events or otherwise . you should carefully consider the possibility that actual results may differ materially from our forward-looking statements . item 1b . unresolved staff comments . item 2 . properties . our corporate headquarters are located in jacksonville , florida , in an owned facility . fnf occupies and pays us rent for approximately 86000 square feet in this facility . we lease office space as follows : number of locations ( 1 ) .

number of locations ( 1 ): california: 44
texas: 21
florida: 18
georgia new york: 10
new jersey: 8
illinois massachusetts: 7
alabama arizona minnesota north carolina: 6
other: 64

( 1 ) represents the number of locations in each state listed . we also lease approximately 72 locations outside the united states . we believe our properties are adequate for our business as presently conducted . item 3 . legal proceedings . in the ordinary course of business , the company is involved in various pending and threatened litigation matters related to operations , some of which include claims for punitive or exemplary damages . the company believes that no actions , other than the matters listed below , depart from customary litigation incidental to its business . as background to the disclosure below , please note the following : 2022 these matters raise difficult and complicated factual and legal issues and are subject to many uncertainties and complexities . 2022 the company reviews these matters on an on-going basis and follows the provisions of statement of financial accounting standards no . 5 , accounting for contingencies ( 201csfas 5 201d ) , when making accrual and disclosure decisions . when assessing reasonably possible and probable outcomes , the company bases decisions on the assessment of the ultimate outcome following all appeals. .

Questions:
what is the total number of leased locations?
and what percentage do the locations in the united states represent in relation to this total?

Answers:
136
47.1%
part ii item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities at january 25 , 2019 , we had 26812 holders of record of our common stock , par value $ 1 per share . our common stock is traded on the new york stock exchange ( nyse ) under the symbol lmt . information concerning dividends paid on lockheed martin common stock during the past two years is as follows : common stock - dividends paid per share .

dividends paid per share 2018: first: 2
second: 2
third: 2
fourth: 2.2
year: 8.2
dividends paid per share 2017: first: 1.82
second: 1.82
third: 1.82
fourth: 2
year: 7.46

stockholder return performance graph the following graph compares the total return on a cumulative basis of $ 100 invested in lockheed martin common stock on december 31 , 2013 to the standard and poor 2019s ( s&p ) 500 index and the s&p aerospace & defense index . the s&p aerospace & defense index comprises arconic inc. , general dynamics corporation , harris corporation , huntington ingalls industries , l3 technologies , inc. , lockheed martin corporation , northrop grumman corporation , raytheon company , textron inc. , the boeing company , transdigm group inc. , and united technologies corporation . the stockholder return performance indicated on the graph is not a guarantee of future performance. .

Questions:
what is the total dividends paid per share during 2018?
what about during 2017?
what is the net change?
what percentage change does this represent?
what is the net change in dividends per share from 2017 to 2018?

Answers:
8.20
7.46
0.74
9.9%
0.74
the following table provides the weighted average assumptions used in the black-scholes option-pricing model for grants and the resulting weighted average grant date fair value per share of stock options granted for the years ended december 31: .

2018: intrinsic value: 9
exercise proceeds: 7
income tax benefit realized: 2
2017: intrinsic value: 10
exercise proceeds: 11
income tax benefit realized: 3
2016: intrinsic value: 18
exercise proceeds: 15
income tax benefit realized: 6

stock units during 2018 , 2017 and 2016 , the company granted rsus to certain employees under the 2007 plan and 2017 omnibus plan , as applicable . rsus generally vest based on continued employment with the company over periods ranging from one to three years. .

Questions:
what is the intrinsic value in 2018?
what about in 2016?
what is the net change?
what percentage change does this represent?

Answers:
9
18
-9
-50%