sharick008/convfinqa huggingface dataset:
6feb201418202649 performance graph the table below compares the cumulative total shareholder return on our common stock with the cumulative total return of ( i ) the standard & poor 2019s 500 composite stock index ( 2018 2018s&p 500 index 2019 2019 ) , ( ii ) the standard & poor 2019s industrials index ( 2018 2018s&p industrials index 2019 2019 ) and ( iii ) the standard & poor 2019s consumer durables & apparel index ( 2018 2018s&p consumer durables & apparel index 2019 2019 ) , from december 31 , 2008 through december 31 , 2013 , when the closing price of our common stock was $ 22.77 . the graph assumes investments of $ 100 on december 31 , 2008 in our common stock and in each of the three indices and the reinvestment of dividends . $ 350.00 $ 300.00 $ 250.00 $ 200.00 $ 150.00 $ 100.00 $ 50.00 performance graph .

2009: masco: 128.21
s&p 500 index: 125.92
s&p industrials index: 120.19
s&p consumer durables & apparel index: 136.29
2010: masco: 120.32
s&p 500 index: 144.58
s&p industrials index: 151.89
s&p consumer durables & apparel index: 177.91
2011: masco: 102.45
s&p 500 index: 147.6
s&p industrials index: 150.97
s&p consumer durables & apparel index: 191.64
2012: masco: 165.8
s&p 500 index: 171.04
s&p industrials index: 173.87
s&p consumer durables & apparel index: 232.84
2013: masco: 229.59
s&p 500 index: 225.85
s&p industrials index: 243.73
s&p consumer durables & apparel index: 316.28

in july 2007 , our board of directors authorized the purchase of up to 50 million shares of our common stock in open-market transactions or otherwise . at december 31 , 2013 , we had remaining authorization to repurchase up to 22.6 million shares . during the first quarter of 2013 , we repurchased and retired 1.7 million shares of our common stock , for cash aggregating $ 35 million to offset the dilutive impact of the 2013 grant of 1.7 million shares of long-term stock awards . we have not purchased any shares since march 2013. .

Questions:
what was the performance value of the s&p 500 index in 2010?
and what was it in 2009?
what was, then, the change over the year?
and how much does this change represent in relation to the 2009 performance value of that stock, in percentage?

Answers:
144.58
125.92
18.66
14.82%
shareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the sec , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates such information by reference into such filing . the following graph shows a five year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 index , and the dow jones transportation average . the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2008 in the standard & poor 2019s 500 index , the dow jones transportation average , and our class b common stock. .

12/31/2008: united parcel service inc .: 100
standard & poor 2019s 500 index: 100
dow jones transportation average: 100
12/31/2009: united parcel service inc .: 107.75
standard & poor 2019s 500 index: 126.45
dow jones transportation average: 118.59
12/31/2010: united parcel service inc .: 140.39
standard & poor 2019s 500 index: 145.49
dow jones transportation average: 150.3
12/31/2011: united parcel service inc .: 145.84
standard & poor 2019s 500 index: 148.55
dow jones transportation average: 150.31
12/31/2012: united parcel service inc .: 151.44
standard & poor 2019s 500 index: 172.3
dow jones transportation average: 161.56
12/31/2013: united parcel service inc .: 221.91
standard & poor 2019s 500 index: 228.09
dow jones transportation average: 228.42

.

Questions:
what was the value of united parcel service inc . in the year of 2013?
and what is the difference between that value and the original investment made in 2008?
how much does that difference represent, in percentage, in relation to the original investment?
what is the difference between the value of dow jones transportation average in 2013 and 2008?
and how much does that difference represent, percentually, in relation to the 2008 value?
what is the difference, then, between the percentage difference of united parcel inc. and the one of dow jones transportation average?

Answers:
221.91
121.91
121.91%
128.42
128.42%
-6.51%
part ii , item 8 fourth quarter of 2007 : 0160 schlumberger sold certain workover rigs for $ 32 million , resulting in a pretax gain of $ 24 million ( $ 17 million after-tax ) which is classified in interest and other income , net in the consolidated statement of income . 4 . acquisitions acquisition of eastern echo holding plc on december 10 , 2007 , schlumberger completed the acquisition of eastern echo holding plc ( 201ceastern echo 201d ) for $ 838 million in cash . eastern echo was a dubai-based marine seismic company that did not have any operations at the time of acquisition , but had signed contracts for the construction of six seismic vessels . the purchase price has been allocated to the net assets acquired based upon their estimated fair values as follows : ( stated in millions ) .

$ 266: other current assets: 23
fixed income investments held to maturity: 54
vessels under construction: 694
accounts payable and accrued liabilities: -17
long-term debt: -182
total purchase price: 838

other acquisitions schlumberger has made other acquisitions and minority interest investments , none of which were significant on an individual basis , for cash payments , net of cash acquired , of $ 514 million during 2009 , $ 345 million during 2008 , and $ 281 million during 2007 . pro forma results pertaining to the above acquisitions are not presented as the impact was not significant . 5 . drilling fluids joint venture the mi-swaco drilling fluids joint venture is owned 40% ( 40 % ) by schlumberger and 60% ( 60 % ) by smith international , inc . schlumberger records income relating to this venture using the equity method of accounting . the carrying value of schlumberger 2019s investment in the joint venture on december 31 , 2009 and 2008 was $ 1.4 billion and $ 1.3 billion , respectively , and is included within investments in affiliated companies on the consolidated balance sheet . schlumberger 2019s equity income from this joint venture was $ 131 million in 2009 , $ 210 million in 2008 and $ 178 million in 2007 . schlumberger received cash distributions from the joint venture of $ 106 million in 2009 , $ 57 million in 2008 and $ 46 million in 2007 . the joint venture agreement contains a provision under which either party to the joint venture may offer to sell its entire interest in the venture to the other party at a cash purchase price per percentage interest specified in an offer notice . if the offer to sell is not accepted , the offering party will be obligated to purchase the entire interest of the other party at the same price per percentage interest as the prices specified in the offer notice. .

Questions:
what was the value of long term debt?
what was the positive value of accounts payable and accrued liabilities?
what is the sum?
what is the sum including total purchase price?
was is the ratio of the sum net total purchase price to that including?

Answers:
182
17
199
1037
0.19
performance graph the performance graph below shows the five-year cumulative total stockholder return on applied common stock during the period from october 28 , 2007 through october 28 , 2012 . this is compared with the cumulative total return of the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index and the rdg semiconductor composite index over the same period . the comparison assumes $ 100 was invested on october 28 , 2007 in applied common stock and in each of the foregoing indices and assumes reinvestment of dividends , if any . dollar amounts in the graph are rounded to the nearest whole dollar . the performance shown in the graph represents past performance and should not be considered an indication of future performance . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among applied materials , inc. , the s&p 500 index and the rdg semiconductor composite index * $ 100 invested on 10/28/07 in stock or 10/31/07 in index , including reinvestment of dividends . indexes calculated on month-end basis . copyright a9 2012 s&p , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved. .

10/28/2007: applied materials: 100
s&p 500 index: 100
rdg semiconductor composite index: 100
10/26/2008: applied materials: 61.22
s&p 500 index: 63.9
rdg semiconductor composite index: 54.74
10/25/2009: applied materials: 71.06
s&p 500 index: 70.17
rdg semiconductor composite index: 68.59
10/31/2010: applied materials: 69.23
s&p 500 index: 81.76
rdg semiconductor composite index: 84.46
10/30/2011: applied materials: 72.37
s&p 500 index: 88.37
rdg semiconductor composite index: 91.33
10/28/2012: applied materials: 62.92
s&p 500 index: 101.81
rdg semiconductor composite index: 82.37

dividends during fiscal 2012 , applied 2019s board of directors declared three quarterly cash dividends in the amount of $ 0.09 per share each and one quarterly cash dividend in the amount of $ 0.08 per share . during fiscal 2011 , applied 2019s board of directors declared three quarterly cash dividends in the amount of $ 0.08 per share each and one quarterly cash dividend in the amount of $ 0.07 per share . during fiscal 2010 , applied 2019s board of directors declared three quarterly cash dividends in the amount of $ 0.07 per share each and one quarterly cash dividend in the amount of $ 0.06 . dividends declared during fiscal 2012 , 2011 and 2010 amounted to $ 438 million , $ 408 million and $ 361 million , respectively . applied currently anticipates that it will continue to pay cash dividends on a quarterly basis in the future , although the declaration and amount of any future cash dividends are at the discretion of the board of directors and will depend on applied 2019s financial condition , results of operations , capital requirements , business conditions and other factors , as well as a determination that cash dividends are in the best interests of applied 2019s stockholders . 10/28/07 10/26/08 10/25/09 10/31/10 10/30/11 10/28/12 applied materials , inc . s&p 500 rdg semiconductor composite .

Questions:
what was the dividend yield for 2012 for applied materials?
and for 2010?
so what was the difference in yield between these two years?

Answers:
0.14%
0.1%
0.04%
10-k altria ar release tuesday , february 27 , 2018 10:00pm andra design llc performance stock units : in january 2017 , altria group , inc . granted an aggregate of 187886 performance stock units to eligible employees . the payout of the performance stock units requires the achievement of certain performance measures , which were predetermined at the time of grant , over a three-year performance cycle . these performance measures consist of altria group , inc . 2019s adjusted diluted earnings per share ( 201ceps 201d ) compounded annual growth rate and altria group , inc . 2019s total shareholder return relative to a predetermined peer group . the performance stock units are also subject to forfeiture if certain employment conditions are not met . at december 31 , 2017 , altria group , inc . had 170755 performance stock units remaining , with a weighted-average grant date fair value of $ 70.39 per performance stock unit . the fair value of the performance stock units at the date of grant , net of estimated forfeitures , is amortized to expense over the performance period . altria group , inc . recorded pre-tax compensation expense related to performance stock units for the year ended december 31 , 2017 of $ 6 million . the unamortized compensation expense related to altria group , inc . 2019s performance stock units was $ 7 million at december 31 , 2017 . altria group , inc . did not grant any performance stock units during 2016 and 2015 . note 12 . earnings per share basic and diluted eps were calculated using the following: .

for the years ended december 31 , 2017: net earnings attributable to altria group inc .: 10222
less : distributed and undistributed earnings attributable to share-based awards: -14
earnings for basic and diluted eps: 10208
weighted-average shares for basic and diluted eps: 1921
for the years ended december 31 , 2016: net earnings attributable to altria group inc .: 14239
less : distributed and undistributed earnings attributable to share-based awards: -24
earnings for basic and diluted eps: 14215
weighted-average shares for basic and diluted eps: 1952
for the years ended december 31 , 2015: net earnings attributable to altria group inc .: 5241
less : distributed and undistributed earnings attributable to share-based awards: -10
earnings for basic and diluted eps: 5231
weighted-average shares for basic and diluted eps: 1961

net earnings attributable to altria group , inc . $ 10222 $ 14239 $ 5241 less : distributed and undistributed earnings attributable to share-based awards ( 14 ) ( 24 ) ( 10 ) earnings for basic and diluted eps $ 10208 $ 14215 $ 5231 weighted-average shares for basic and diluted eps 1921 1952 1961 .

Questions:
what was the change in earnings for basic and diluted eps from 2016 to 2017?
how much does that change represent, percentually, in relation to the 2016 earnings for basic and diluted eps?

Answers:
4007
39.3%
entergy louisiana , llc management's financial discussion and analysis net revenue 2008 compared to 2007 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2008 to 2007 . amount ( in millions ) .

amount ( in millions ): 2007 net revenue: 991.1
retail electric price: -17.1
purchased power capacity: -12
net wholesale revenue: -7.4
other: 4.6
2008 net revenue: 959.2

the retail electric price variance is primarily due to the cessation of the interim storm recovery through the formula rate plan upon the act 55 financing of storm costs and a credit passed on to customers as a result of the act 55 storm cost financing , partially offset by increases in the formula rate plan effective october 2007 . refer to "hurricane rita and hurricane katrina" and "state and local rate regulation" below for a discussion of the interim recovery of storm costs , the act 55 storm cost financing , and the formula rate plan filing . the purchased power capacity variance is due to the amortization of deferred capacity costs effective september 2007 as a result of the formula rate plan filing in may 2007 . purchased power capacity costs are offset in base revenues due to a base rate increase implemented to recover incremental deferred and ongoing purchased power capacity charges . see "state and local rate regulation" below for a discussion of the formula rate plan filing . the net wholesale revenue variance is primarily due to provisions recorded for potential rate refunds related to the treatment of interruptible load in pricing entergy system affiliate sales . gross operating revenue and , fuel and purchased power expenses gross operating revenues increased primarily due to an increase of $ 364.7 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due to higher fuel rates offset by decreased usage . the increase was partially offset by a decrease of $ 56.8 million in gross wholesale revenue due to a decrease in system agreement rough production cost equalization credits . fuel and purchased power expenses increased primarily due to increases in the average market prices of natural gas and purchased power , partially offset by a decrease in the recovery from customers of deferred fuel costs. .

Questions:
what is the sum of the retail electric price and purchased power capacity?
what is the sum including new wholesale revenue?
what was the value of other revenues?
what is the total sum of revenues?

Answers:
-29.1
-36.5
4.6
-31.9
in the ordinary course of business , based on our evaluations of certain geologic trends and prospective economics , we have allowed certain lease acreage to expire and may allow additional acreage to expire in the future . if production is not established or we take no other action to extend the terms of the leases , licenses or concessions , undeveloped acreage listed in the table below will expire over the next three years . we plan to continue the terms of certain of these licenses and concession areas or retain leases through operational or administrative actions ; however , the majority of the undeveloped acres associated with other africa as listed in the table below pertains to our licenses in ethiopia and kenya , for which we executed agreements in 2015 to sell . the kenya transaction closed in february 2016 and the ethiopia transaction is expected to close in the first quarter of 2016 . see item 8 . financial statements and supplementary data - note 5 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information about this disposition . net undeveloped acres expiring year ended december 31 .

net undeveloped acres expiring year ended december 31 , 2016: u.s .: 68
e.g .: 2014
other africa: 189
total africa: 189
other international: 2014
total: 257
net undeveloped acres expiring year ended december 31 , 2017: u.s .: 89
e.g .: 92
other africa: 4352
total africa: 4444
other international: 2014
total: 4533
net undeveloped acres expiring year ended december 31 , 2018: u.s .: 128
e.g .: 36
other africa: 854
total africa: 890
other international: 2014
total: 1018

.

Questions:
what was the total african and us net undeveloped acres expiring in 2016?
what percentage of undeveloped acres were in the us in 2018?

Answers:
257
12.6%
part ii . item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities our common stock is traded on the nasdaq global select market under the symbol cdns . as of february 2 , 2019 , we had 523 registered stockholders and approximately 56000 beneficial owners of our common stock . stockholder return performance graph the following graph compares the cumulative 5-year total stockholder return on our common stock relative to the cumulative total return of the nasdaq composite index , the s&p 500 index and the s&p 500 information technology index . the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock and in each index on december 28 , 2013 ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 and tracks it each year thereafter on the last day of our fiscal year through december 29 , 2018 and , for each index , on the last day of the calendar year . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among cadence design systems , inc. , the nasdaq composite index , the s&p 500 index and the s&p 500 information technology index 12/29/181/2/16 12/30/1712/28/13 12/31/161/3/15 *$ 100 invested on 12/28/13 in stock or index , including reinvestment of dividends . fiscal year ending december 29 . copyright a9 2019 standard & poor 2019s , a division of s&p global . all rights reserved . nasdaq compositecadence design systems , inc . s&p 500 s&p 500 information technology .

12/28/2013: cadence design systems inc .: 100
nasdaq composite: 100
s&p 500: 100
s&p 500 information technology: 100
1/3/2015: cadence design systems inc .: 135.18
nasdaq composite: 112.6
s&p 500: 110.28
s&p 500 information technology: 115.49
1/2/2016: cadence design systems inc .: 149.39
nasdaq composite: 113.64
s&p 500: 109.54
s&p 500 information technology: 121.08
12/31/2016: cadence design systems inc .: 181.05
nasdaq composite: 133.19
s&p 500: 129.05
s&p 500 information technology: 144.85
12/30/2017: cadence design systems inc .: 300.22
nasdaq composite: 172.11
s&p 500: 157.22
s&p 500 information technology: 201.1
12/29/2018: cadence design systems inc .: 311.13
nasdaq composite: 165.84
s&p 500: 150.33
s&p 500 information technology: 200.52

the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance. .

Questions:
what is the change in price of the s&p 500 from 2015 to 2016?
what is 100000 divided by 100?
what is the product of the change by the quotient?

Answers:
18.77
1000
1877
entergy new orleans , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis net revenue 2008 compared to 2007 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2008 to 2007 . amount ( in millions ) .

amount ( in millions ): 2007 net revenue: 231
volume/weather: 15.5
net gas revenue: 6.6
rider revenue: 3.9
base revenue: -11.3
other: 7
2008 net revenue: 252.7

the volume/weather variance is due to an increase in electricity usage in the service territory in 2008 compared to the same period in 2007 . entergy new orleans estimates that approximately 141000 electric customers and 93000 gas customers have returned since hurricane katrina and are taking service as of december 31 , 2008 , compared to approximately 132000 electric customers and 86000 gas customers as of december 31 , 2007 . billed retail electricity usage increased a total of 184 gwh compared to the same period in 2007 , an increase of 4% ( 4 % ) . the net gas revenue variance is primarily due to an increase in base rates in march and november 2007 . refer to note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the base rate increase . the rider revenue variance is due primarily to higher total revenue and a storm reserve rider effective march 2007 as a result of the city council's approval of a settlement agreement in october 2006 . the approved storm reserve has been set to collect $ 75 million over a ten-year period through the rider and the funds will be held in a restricted escrow account . the settlement agreement is discussed in note 2 to the financial statements . the base revenue variance is primarily due to a base rate recovery credit , effective january 2008 . the base rate credit is discussed in note 2 to the financial statements . gross operating revenues and fuel and purchased power expenses gross operating revenues increased primarily due to : an increase of $ 58.9 million in gross wholesale revenue due to increased sales to affiliated customers and an increase in the average price of energy available for resale sales ; an increase of $ 47.7 million in electric fuel cost recovery revenues due to higher fuel rates and increased electricity usage ; and an increase of $ 22 million in gross gas revenues due to higher fuel recovery revenues and increases in gas base rates in march 2007 and november 2007 . fuel and purchased power increased primarily due to increases in the average market prices of natural gas and purchased power in addition to an increase in demand. .

Questions:
what was the number of gas customers in 2008?
and what was it in 2007?
what was, then, the change in that number over the year?
and how much does this change represent in relation to the 2007 number of customers, in percentage?

Answers:
93000
86000
7000
8%