sharick008/convfinqa huggingface dataset:
entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis the miso deferral variance is primarily due to the deferral in 2014 of non-fuel miso-related charges , as approved by the lpsc and the mpsc . the deferral of non-fuel miso-related charges is partially offset in other operation and maintenance expenses . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the recovery of non-fuel miso-related charges . the waterford 3 replacement steam generator provision is due to a regulatory charge of approximately $ 32 million recorded in 2015 related to the uncertainty associated with the resolution of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator project . see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding . entergy wholesale commodities following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2015 to 2014 . amount ( in millions ) .

amount ( in millions ): 2014 net revenue: 2224
nuclear realized price changes: -310
vermont yankee shutdown in december 2014: -305
nuclear volume excluding vermont yankee effect: 20
other: 37
2015 net revenue: 1666

as shown in the table above , net revenue for entergy wholesale commodities decreased by approximately $ 558 million in 2015 primarily due to : 2022 lower realized wholesale energy prices , primarily due to significantly higher northeast market power prices in 2014 , and lower capacity prices in 2015 ; and 2022 a decrease in net revenue as a result of vermont yankee ceasing power production in december 2014 . the decrease was partially offset by higher volume in the entergy wholesale commodities nuclear fleet , excluding vermont yankee , resulting from fewer refueling outage days in 2015 as compared to 2014 , partially offset by more unplanned outage days in 2015 as compared to 2014. .

Questions:
what was the change in net sales for entergy wholesale commodities from the year of 2014 to 2015, in millions?
how much, in percentage, does that change represent in relation to the 2014 net sales?

Answers:
-558
-25.1%
entergy mississippi , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis the net wholesale revenue variance is primarily due to lower profit on joint account sales and reduced capacity revenue from the municipal energy agency of mississippi . gross operating revenues , fuel and purchased power expenses , and other regulatory charges gross operating revenues increased primarily due to an increase of $ 152.5 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due to higher fuel rates , partially offset by a decrease of $ 43 million in gross wholesale revenues due to a decrease in net generation and purchases in excess of decreased net area demand resulting in less energy available for resale sales coupled with a decrease in system agreement remedy receipts . fuel and purchased power expenses increased primarily due to increases in the average market prices of natural gas and purchased power , partially offset by decreased demand and decreased recovery from customers of deferred fuel costs . other regulatory charges increased primarily due to increased recovery through the grand gulf rider of grand gulf capacity costs due to higher rates and increased recovery of costs associated with the power management recovery rider . there is no material effect on net income due to quarterly adjustments to the power management recovery rider . 2007 compared to 2006 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2007 to 2006 . amount ( in millions ) .

amount ( in millions ): 2006 net revenue: 466.1
base revenue: 7.9
volume/weather: 4.5
transmission revenue: 4.1
transmission equalization: 4
reserve equalization: 3.8
attala costs: -10.2
other: 6.7
2007 net revenue: 486.9

the base revenue variance is primarily due to a formula rate plan increase effective july 2007 . the formula rate plan filing is discussed further in "state and local rate regulation" below . the volume/weather variance is primarily due to increased electricity usage primarily in the residential and commercial sectors , including the effect of more favorable weather on billed electric sales in 2007 compared to 2006 . billed electricity usage increased 214 gwh . the increase in usage was partially offset by decreased usage in the industrial sector . the transmission revenue variance is due to higher rates and the addition of new transmission customers in late 2006 . the transmission equalization variance is primarily due to a revision made in 2006 of transmission equalization receipts among entergy companies . the reserve equalization variance is primarily due to a revision in 2006 of reserve equalization payments among entergy companies due to a ferc ruling regarding the inclusion of interruptible loads in reserve .

Questions:
what was the value of net revenue in 2007?
and in 2006?
so by how much did this value change over these years?
and the percentage change?

Answers:
486.9
466.1
20.8
4.5%
performance graph the following graph shows a five-year comparison of the cumulative total return on our common stock , the nasdaq composite index , the s&p 500 index and the s&p 500 information technology index from april 24 , 2009 through april 25 , 2014 . the past performance of our common stock is not indicative of the future performance of our common stock . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among netapp , inc. , the nasdaq composite index , the s&p 500 index and the s&p 500 information technology index .

4/09: netapp inc .: 100
nasdaq composite: 100
s&p 500: 100
s&p 500 information technology: 100
4/10: netapp inc .: 189.45
nasdaq composite: 144.63
s&p 500: 138.84
s&p 500 information technology: 143.49
4/11: netapp inc .: 284.75
nasdaq composite: 170.44
s&p 500: 162.75
s&p 500 information technology: 162.37
4/12: netapp inc .: 212.19
nasdaq composite: 182.57
s&p 500: 170.49
s&p 500 information technology: 186.06
4/13: netapp inc .: 190.66
nasdaq composite: 202.25
s&p 500: 199.29
s&p 500 information technology: 189.18
4/14: netapp inc .: 197.58
nasdaq composite: 253.22
s&p 500: 240.02
s&p 500 information technology: 236.12

we believe that a number of factors may cause the market price of our common stock to fluctuate significantly . see 201citem 1a . risk factors . 201d sale of unregistered securities .

Questions:
what is the value of netapp inc on 4/14 less 100?
what is that value divided by 100?
what was the price of the s&p information technology on 4/14?
what is that number less 100?
what is that divided by 100?
what is the difference between the netapp and s&p ratios?

Answers:
97.58
97.58%
236.12
136.12
136.12%
-38.54
changes in our performance retention awards during 2009 were as follows : shares ( thous. ) weighted-average grant-date fair value .

shares ( thous. ): nonvested at january 1 2009: 873
granted: 449
vested: -240
forfeited: -22
nonvested at december 31 2009: 1060
weighted-averagegrant-date fair value: nonvested at january 1 2009: 50.7
granted: 47.28
vested: 43.23
forfeited: 53.86
nonvested at december 31 2009: 50.88

at december 31 , 2009 , there was $ 22 million of total unrecognized compensation expense related to nonvested performance retention awards , which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.3 years . a portion of this expense is subject to achievement of the roic levels established for the performance stock unit grants . 5 . retirement plans pension and other postretirement benefits pension plans 2013 we provide defined benefit retirement income to eligible non-union employees through qualified and non-qualified ( supplemental ) pension plans . qualified and non-qualified pension benefits are based on years of service and the highest compensation during the latest years of employment , with specific reductions made for early retirements . other postretirement benefits ( opeb ) 2013 we provide defined contribution medical and life insurance benefits for eligible retirees . these benefits are funded as medical claims and life insurance premiums are plan amendment effective january 1 , 2010 , medicare-eligible retirees who are enrolled in the union pacific retiree medical program will receive a contribution to a health reimbursement account , which can be used to pay eligible out-of-pocket medical expenses . the impact of the plan amendment is reflected in the projected benefit obligation ( pbo ) at december 31 , 2009 . funded status we are required by gaap to separately recognize the overfunded or underfunded status of our pension and opeb plans as an asset or liability . the funded status represents the difference between the pbo and the fair value of the plan assets . the pbo is the present value of benefits earned to date by plan participants , including the effect of assumed future salary increases . the pbo of the opeb plan is equal to the accumulated benefit obligation , as the present value of the opeb liabilities is not affected by salary increases . plan assets are measured at fair value . we use a december 31 measurement date for plan assets and obligations for all our retirement plans. .

Questions:
what was the amount of nonvested shares as of 12/31/09?
now converted to millions?
and considering the amount of shares forfeited, in millions?
so what was the remaining compensation expense per share for unvested awards?

Answers:
1060
1060000
22000000
20.75
stock performance graph : the graph below shows the cumulative total shareholder return assuming the investment of $ 100 , on december 31 , 2013 , and the reinvestment of dividends thereafter , if any , in the company 2019s common stock versus the standard and poor 2019s s&p 500 retail index ( 201cs&p 500 retail index 201d ) and the standard and poor 2019s s&p 500 index ( 201cs&p 500 201d ) . .

december 31 , 2013: o 2019reilly automotive inc .: 100
s&p 500 retail index: 100
s&p 500: 100
december 31 , 2014: o 2019reilly automotive inc .: 150
s&p 500 retail index: 110
s&p 500: 111
december 31 , 2015: o 2019reilly automotive inc .: 197
s&p 500 retail index: 137
s&p 500: 111
december 31 , 2016: o 2019reilly automotive inc .: 216
s&p 500 retail index: 143
s&p 500: 121
december 31 , 2017: o 2019reilly automotive inc .: 187
s&p 500 retail index: 184
s&p 500: 145
december 31 , 2018: o 2019reilly automotive inc .: 268
s&p 500 retail index: 208
s&p 500: 136

.

Questions:
what was the value of s&p500 in 2017?
and what was it in 2013?
what was, then, the change over the years?
what was the value of s&p500 in 2013?
and how much does that change represent in relation to this 2013 value?

Answers:
145
100
45
100
45%
12feb201521095992 performance graph the following graph compares the performance of our common stock with that of the s&p 500 index and the s&p 500 healthcare equipment index . the cumulative total return listed below assumes an initial investment of $ 100 on december 31 , 2009 and reinvestment of dividends . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return rs $ 200 2009 2010 2011 201420132012 edwards lifesciences corporation s&p 500 s&p 500 healthcare equipment december 31 .

2010: edwards lifesciences: 186.16
s&p 500: 115.06
s&p 500 healthcare equipment index: 96.84
2011: edwards lifesciences: 162.81
s&p 500: 117.49
s&p 500 healthcare equipment index: 102.07
2012: edwards lifesciences: 207.65
s&p 500: 136.3
s&p 500 healthcare equipment index: 120.66
2013: edwards lifesciences: 151.43
s&p 500: 180.44
s&p 500 healthcare equipment index: 153.85
2014: edwards lifesciences: 293.33
s&p 500: 205.14
s&p 500 healthcare equipment index: 194.33

.

Questions:
what is the value of an investment in edwards lifesciences in 2014?
what about the initial value?
what is the net change?
what is the initial value of the investment?
what rate of return does this represent?

Answers:
293.33
100
193.33
100
193%
movement in exit cost liabilities the movement in exit cost liabilities for pmi was as follows : ( in millions ) .

$ 308: charges net: 68
cash spent: -232
currency/other: -52
liability balance december 31 2014: 270
liability balance december 31 2015: 54

cash payments related to exit costs at pmi were $ 232 million , $ 360 million and $ 21 million for the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively . future cash payments for exit costs incurred to date are expected to be approximately $ 54 million , and will be substantially paid by the end of 2017 . the pre-tax asset impairment and exit costs shown above are primarily a result of the following : the netherlands on april 4 , 2014 , pmi announced the initiation by its affiliate , philip morris holland b.v . ( 201cpmh 201d ) , of consultations with employee representatives on a proposal to discontinue cigarette production at its factory located in bergen op zoom , the netherlands . pmh reached an agreement with the trade unions and their members on a social plan and ceased cigarette production on september 1 , 2014 . during 2014 , total pre-tax asset impairment and exit costs of $ 489 million were recorded for this program in the european union segment . this amount includes employee separation costs of $ 343 million , asset impairment costs of $ 139 million and other separation costs of $ 7 million . separation program charges pmi recorded other pre-tax separation program charges of $ 68 million , $ 41 million and $ 51 million for the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively . the 2015 other pre-tax separation program charges primarily related to severance costs for the organizational restructuring in the european union segment . the 2014 other pre-tax separation program charges primarily related to severance costs for factory closures in australia and canada and the restructuring of the u.s . leaf purchasing model . the 2013 pre-tax separation program charges primarily related to the restructuring of global and regional functions based in switzerland and australia . contract termination charges during 2013 , pmi recorded exit costs of $ 258 million related to the termination of distribution agreements in eastern europe , middle east & africa ( due to a new business model in egypt ) and asia . asset impairment charges during 2014 , pmi recorded other pre-tax asset impairment charges of $ 5 million related to a factory closure in canada. .

Questions:
what was the liability balance by the end of 2015?
and what was it in the beginning of that year?
what was, then, the change throughout the year?
and between that year and the one before, what was the change in the amount of cash spent?

Answers:
54
270
-216
-128
stock performance graph the following graph provides a comparison of five year cumulative total stockholder returns of teleflex common stock , the standard a0& poor 2019s ( s&p ) 500 stock index and the s&p 500 healthcare equipment & supply index . the annual changes for the five-year period shown on the graph are based on the assumption that $ 100 had been invested in teleflex common stock and each index on december a031 , 2012 and that all dividends were reinvested . market performance .

2012: teleflex incorporated: 100
s&p 500 index: 100
s&p 500 healthcare equipment & supply index: 100
2013: teleflex incorporated: 134
s&p 500 index: 132
s&p 500 healthcare equipment & supply index: 128
2014: teleflex incorporated: 166
s&p 500 index: 151
s&p 500 healthcare equipment & supply index: 161
2015: teleflex incorporated: 192
s&p 500 index: 153
s&p 500 healthcare equipment & supply index: 171
2016: teleflex incorporated: 237
s&p 500 index: 171
s&p 500 healthcare equipment & supply index: 181
2017: teleflex incorporated: 368
s&p 500 index: 208
s&p 500 healthcare equipment & supply index: 238

s&p 500 healthcare equipment & supply index 100 128 161 171 181 238 .

Questions:
what was the performance price of the teleflex in 2017?
and what was the change in this price since 2012?
what was this change as a portion of the 2012 performance price of that stock?
in that same period, what was that change for the s&p 500 index?
and what percentage did this change represent in relation to the performance price of this stock in 2012?

Answers:
368
268
268%
108
108%
devon energy corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) the following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair values in the tables above . fixed-income securities 2014 devon 2019s fixed-income securities consist of u.s . treasury obligations , bonds issued by investment-grade companies from diverse industries , and asset-backed securities . these fixed-income securities are actively traded securities that can be redeemed upon demand . the fair values of these level 1 securities are based upon quoted market prices . devon 2019s fixed income securities also include commingled funds that primarily invest in long-term bonds and u.s . treasury securities . these fixed income securities can be redeemed on demand but are not actively traded . the fair values of these level 2 securities are based upon the net asset values provided by the investment managers . equity securities 2014 devon 2019s equity securities include a commingled global equity fund that invests in large , mid and small capitalization stocks across the world 2019s developed and emerging markets . these equity securities can be redeemed on demand but are not actively traded . the fair values of these level 2 securities are based upon the net asset values provided by the investment managers . at december 31 , 2010 , devon 2019s equity securities consisted of investments in u.s . large and small capitalization companies and international large capitalization companies . these equity securities were actively traded securities that could be redeemed upon demand . the fair values of these level 1 securities are based upon quoted market prices . at december 31 , 2010 , devon 2019s equity securities also included a commingled fund that invested in large capitalization companies . these equity securities could be redeemed on demand but were not actively traded . the fair values of these level 2 securities are based upon the net asset values provided by the investment managers . other securities 2014 devon 2019s other securities include commingled , short-term investment funds . these securities can be redeemed on demand but are not actively traded . the fair values of these level 2 securities are based upon the net asset values provided by investment managers . devon 2019s hedge fund and alternative investments include an investment in an actively traded global mutual fund that focuses on alternative investment strategies and a hedge fund of funds that invests both long and short using a variety of investment strategies . devon 2019s hedge fund of funds is not actively traded and devon is subject to redemption restrictions with regards to this investment . the fair value of this level 3 investment represents the fair value as determined by the hedge fund manager . included below is a summary of the changes in devon 2019s level 3 plan assets ( in millions ) . .

$ 51: purchases: 33
investment returns: -1
december 31 2010: 58
december 31 2011: 90

.

Questions:
what was the net value change in devon 2019s level 3 plan assets from 2009 to 2010?
what was the value in 2009?
what was the percent change?

Answers:
7
51
13.7%
j.p . morgan chase & co . / 2003 annual report 33 corporate credit allocation in 2003 , tss was assigned a corporate credit allocation of pre- tax earnings and the associated capital related to certain credit exposures managed within ib 2019s credit portfolio on behalf of clients shared with tss . prior periods have been revised to reflect this allocation . for 2003 , the impact to tss of this change increased pre-tax operating results by $ 36 million and average allocated capital by $ 712 million , and it decreased sva by $ 65 million . pre-tax operating results were $ 46 million lower than in 2002 , reflecting lower loan volumes and higher related expenses , slightly offset by a decrease in credit costs . business outlook tss revenue in 2004 is expected to benefit from improved global equity markets and from two recent acquisitions : the november 2003 acquisition of the bank one corporate trust portfolio , and the january 2004 acquisition of citigroup 2019s electronic funds services business . tss also expects higher costs as it integrates these acquisitions and continues strategic investments to sup- port business expansion . by client segment tss dimensions of 2003 revenue diversification by business revenue by geographic region investor services 36% ( 36 % ) other 1% ( 1 % ) institutional trust services 23% ( 23 % ) treasury services 40% ( 40 % ) large corporations 21% ( 21 % ) middle market 18% ( 18 % ) banks 11% ( 11 % ) nonbank financial institutions 44% ( 44 % ) public sector/governments 6% ( 6 % ) europe , middle east & africa 27% ( 27 % ) asia/pacific 9% ( 9 % ) the americas 64% ( 64 % ) ( a ) includes the elimination of revenue related to shared activities with chase middle market in the amount of $ 347 million . year ended december 31 , operating revenue .

year ended december 31 , 2003: treasury services: 1927
investor services: 1449
institutional trust services ( a ): 928
other ( a ) ( b ): -312
total treasury & securities services: 3992
year ended december 31 , 2002: treasury services: 1818
investor services: 1513
institutional trust services ( a ): 864
other ( a ) ( b ): -303
total treasury & securities services: 3892
change: treasury services: -6
investor services: -4
institutional trust services ( a ): 7
other ( a ) ( b ): -3
total treasury & securities services: -3

( a ) includes a portion of the $ 41 million gain on sale of a nonstrategic business in 2003 : $ 1 million in institutional trust services and $ 40 million in other . ( b ) includes the elimination of revenues related to shared activities with chase middle market , and a $ 50 million gain on sale of a non-u.s . securities clearing firm in 2002. .

Questions:
in 2003, how much did the total of investor services represent in relation to the one of treasury services revenues?
and what was the total of treasury & securities services in that year?
what would be these total services without the the benefit of the special gain?

Answers:
0.75
3992
3951