sharick008/convfinqa huggingface dataset:
entergy mississippi , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis results of operations net income 2008 compared to 2007 net income decreased $ 12.4 million primarily due to higher other operation and maintenance expenses , lower other income , and higher depreciation and amortization expenses , partially offset by higher net revenue . 2007 compared to 2006 net income increased $ 19.8 million primarily due to higher net revenue , lower other operation and maintenance expenses , higher other income , and lower interest expense , partially offset by higher depreciation and amortization expenses . net revenue 2008 compared to 2007 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2008 to 2007 . amount ( in millions ) .

amount ( in millions ): 2007 net revenue: 486.9
attala costs: 9.9
rider revenue: 6
base revenue: 5.1
reserve equalization: -2.4
net wholesale revenue: -4
other: -2.7
2008 net revenue: 498.8

the attala costs variance is primarily due to an increase in the attala power plant costs that are recovered through the power management rider . the net income effect of this recovery in limited to a portion representing an allowed return on equity with the remainder offset by attala power plant costs in other operation and maintenance expenses , depreciation expenses , and taxes other than income taxes . the recovery of attala power plant costs is discussed further in "liquidity and capital resources - uses of capital" below . the rider revenue variance is the result of a storm damage rider that became effective in october 2007 . the establishment of this rider results in an increase in rider revenue and a corresponding increase in other operation and maintenance expense for the storm reserve with no effect on net income . the base revenue variance is primarily due to a formula rate plan increase effective july 2007 . the formula rate plan filing is discussed further in "state and local rate regulation" below . the reserve equalization variance is primarily due to changes in the entergy system generation mix compared to the same period in 2007. .

Questions:
what was net revenue in 2008?
what was the net revenue in 2007?
what is the change in revenue over the year?
what is the percent change?

Answers:
498.8
486.9
11.9
2.4%
12 . brokerage receivables and brokerage payables citi has receivables and payables for financial instruments sold to and purchased from brokers , dealers and customers , which arise in the ordinary course of business . citi is exposed to risk of loss from the inability of brokers , dealers or customers to pay for purchases or to deliver the financial instruments sold , in which case citi would have to sell or purchase the financial instruments at prevailing market prices . credit risk is reduced to the extent that an exchange or clearing organization acts as a counterparty to the transaction and replaces the broker , dealer or customer in question . citi seeks to protect itself from the risks associated with customer activities by requiring customers to maintain margin collateral in compliance with regulatory and internal guidelines . margin levels are monitored daily , and customers deposit additional collateral as required . where customers cannot meet collateral requirements , citi may liquidate sufficient underlying financial instruments to bring the customer into compliance with the required margin level . exposure to credit risk is impacted by market volatility , which may impair the ability of clients to satisfy their obligations to citi . credit limits are established and closely monitored for customers and for brokers and dealers engaged in forwards , futures and other transactions deemed to be credit sensitive . brokerage receivables and brokerage payables consisted of the following: .

december 31 , 2016: receivables from customers: 10374
receivables from brokers dealers and clearing organizations: 18513
total brokerage receivables ( 1 ): 28887
payables to customers: 37237
payables to brokers dealers and clearing organizations: 19915
total brokerage payables ( 1 ): 57152
december 31 , 2015: receivables from customers: 10435
receivables from brokers dealers and clearing organizations: 17248
total brokerage receivables ( 1 ): 27683
payables to customers: 35653
payables to brokers dealers and clearing organizations: 18069
total brokerage payables ( 1 ): 53722

payables to brokers , dealers , and clearing organizations 19915 18069 total brokerage payables ( 1 ) $ 57152 $ 53722 ( 1 ) includes brokerage receivables and payables recorded by citi broker- dealer entities that are accounted for in accordance with the aicpa accounting guide for brokers and dealers in securities as codified in asc 940-320. .

Questions:
what was the net change in value of total brokerage payable from 2015 to 2016?
what was the 2015 value?
what is the net change divided by that?

Answers:
3430
53722
6.4%
s c h e d u l e i v ace limited and subsidiaries s u p p l e m e n t a l i n f o r m a t i o n c o n c e r n i n g r e i n s u r a n c e premiums earned for the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 , and 2008 ( in millions of u.s . dollars , except for percentages ) direct amount ceded to companies assumed from other companies net amount percentage of amount assumed to .

directamount: 2010: 15780
2009: 15415
2008: 16087
ceded to other companies: 2010: 5792
2009: 5943
2008: 6144
assumed from other companies: 2010: 3516
2009: 3768
2008: 3260
net amount: 2010: 13504
2009: 13240
2008: 13203
percentage of amount assumed to net: 2010: -26
2009: -28
2008: -25

.

Questions:
what is the value of direct amount in 2010?
what about the value of ceded to other companies?
what is the ratio among these two?
what is the net change among ceded and assumed amounts in 2010?

Answers:
15780
5792
2.724
2276
performance graph the following graph compares the yearly change in the cumulative total stockholder return for our last five full fiscal years , based upon the market price of our common stock , with the cumulative total return on a nasdaq composite index ( u.s . companies ) and a peer group , the nasdaq medical equipment-sic code 3840-3849 index , which is comprised of medical equipment companies , for that period . the performance graph assumes the investment of $ 100 on march 31 , 2006 in our common stock , the nasdaq composite index ( u.s . companies ) and the peer group index , and the reinvestment of any and all dividends. .

3/31/2006: abiomed inc: 100
nasdaq composite index: 100
nasdaq medical equipment sic code 3840-3849: 100
3/31/2007: abiomed inc: 105.89
nasdaq composite index: 103.5
nasdaq medical equipment sic code 3840-3849: 88.78
3/31/2008: abiomed inc: 101.86
nasdaq composite index: 97.41
nasdaq medical equipment sic code 3840-3849: 84.26
3/31/2009: abiomed inc: 37.98
nasdaq composite index: 65.33
nasdaq medical equipment sic code 3840-3849: 46.12
3/31/2010: abiomed inc: 80
nasdaq composite index: 102.49
nasdaq medical equipment sic code 3840-3849: 83.47
3/31/2011: abiomed inc: 112.64
nasdaq composite index: 118.86
nasdaq medical equipment sic code 3840-3849: 91.35

this graph is not 201csoliciting material 201d under regulation 14a or 14c of the rules promulgated under the securities exchange act of 1934 , is not deemed filed with the securities and exchange commission and is not to be incorporated by reference in any of our filings under the securities act of 1933 , as amended , or the exchange act whether made before or after the date hereof and irrespective of any general incorporation language in any such filing . transfer agent american stock transfer & trust company , 59 maiden lane , new york , ny 10038 , is our stock transfer agent. .

Questions:
what was the value of the nasdaq composite index in 2009?
what was the value in 2006?
what is the net change?
what is the change divided by the 2006 value?

Answers:
65.33
100
-34.67
-34.7%
loan commitments ( unfunded loans and unused lines of credit ) , asset purchase agreements , standby letters of credit and letters of credit are issued to accommodate the financing needs of state street 2019s clients and to provide credit enhancements to special purpose entities . loan commitments are agreements by state street to lend monies at a future date . asset purchase agreements are commitments to purchase receivables or securities , subject to conditions established in the agreements , and at december 31 , 2001 , include $ 8.0 billion outstanding to special purpose entities . standby letters of credit and letters of credit commit state street to make payments on behalf of clients and special purpose entities when certain specified events occur . standby letters of credit outstanding to special purpose entities were $ 608 million at december 31 , 2001 . these loan , asset purchase and letter of credit commitments are subject to the same credit policies and reviews as loans . the amount and nature of collateral are obtained based upon management 2019s assessment of the credit risk . approximately 89% ( 89 % ) of the loan commitments and asset purchase agreements expire within one year from the date of issue . sincemany of the commitments are expected to expire or renewwithout being drawn , the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements . the following is a summary of the contractual amount of credit-related , off-balance sheet financial instruments at december 31: .

2001: indemnified securities on loan: 113047
loan commitments: 12962
asset purchase agreements: 10366
standby letters of credit: 3918
letters of credit: 164
2000: indemnified securities on loan: 101438
loan commitments: 11367
asset purchase agreements: 7112
standby letters of credit: 4028
letters of credit: 218

state street corporation 53 .

Questions:
what is the net change in the balance of loan commitments from 2000 to 2001?
what percentage change does this represent?
what is the net change in the balance of indemnified securities on loan from 2000 to 2001?
what percentage change does this represent?

Answers:
1595
14.0%
11609
.1144
the diluted earnings per share calculation excludes stock options , sars , restricted stock and units and performance units and stock that were anti-dilutive . shares underlying the excluded stock options and sars totaled 2.6 million , 10.3 million and 10.2 million for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . for the year ended december 31 , 2016 , 4.5 million shares of restricted stock and restricted stock units and performance units and performance stock were excluded . 10 . supplemental cash flow information net cash paid for interest and income taxes was as follows for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 ( in thousands ) : .

2017: interest net of capitalized interest: 275305
income taxes net of refunds received: 188946
2016: interest net of capitalized interest: 252030
income taxes net of refunds received: -39293
2015: interest net of capitalized interest: 222088
income taxes net of refunds received: 41108

eog's accrued capital expenditures at december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 were $ 475 million , $ 388 million and $ 416 million , respectively . non-cash investing activities for the year ended december 31 , 2017 included non-cash additions of $ 282 million to eog's oil and gas properties as a result of property exchanges . non-cash investing activities for the year ended december 31 , 2016 included $ 3834 million in non-cash additions to eog's oil and gas properties related to the yates transaction ( see note 17 ) . 11 . business segment information eog's operations are all crude oil and natural gas exploration and production related . the segment reporting topic of the asc establishes standards for reporting information about operating segments in annual financial statements . operating segments are defined as components of an enterprise about which separate financial information is available and evaluated regularly by the chief operating decision maker , or decision-making group , in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance . eog's chief operating decision-making process is informal and involves the chairman of the board and chief executive officer and other key officers . this group routinely reviews and makes operating decisions related to significant issues associated with each of eog's major producing areas in the united states , trinidad , the united kingdom and china . for segment reporting purposes , the chief operating decision maker considers the major united states producing areas to be one operating segment. .

Questions:
what was the interest net of capitalized interest in 2017?
what was the interest net of capitalized interest in 2016?
what is the ratio of 2017 over 2016?
what is that value less 1?

Answers:
275305
252030
1.09235
9.235%
five-year performance comparison 2013 the following graph provides an indicator of cumulative total shareholder returns for the corporation as compared to the peer group index ( described above ) , the dj trans , and the s&p 500 . the graph assumes that $ 100 was invested in the common stock of union pacific corporation and each index on december 31 , 2007 and that all dividends were reinvested . purchases of equity securities 2013 during 2012 , we repurchased 13804709 shares of our common stock at an average price of $ 115.33 . the following table presents common stock repurchases during each month for the fourth quarter of 2012 : period total number of shares purchased [a] average price paid per share total number of shares purchased as part of a publicly announced plan or program [b] maximum number of shares that may yet be purchased under the plan or program [b] .

total number ofsharespurchased [a]: oct . 1 through oct . 31: 1068414
nov . 1 through nov . 30: 659631
dec . 1 through dec . 31: 411683
total: 2139728
averageprice paidper share: oct . 1 through oct . 31: 121.7
nov . 1 through nov . 30: 120.84
dec . 1 through dec . 31: 124.58
total: 121.99
total number of sharespurchased as part of apublicly announced planor program [b]: oct . 1 through oct . 31: 1028300
nov . 1 through nov . 30: 655000
dec . 1 through dec . 31: 350450
total: 2033750
maximum number ofshares that may yetbe purchased under the planor program [b]: oct . 1 through oct . 31: 16041399
nov . 1 through nov . 30: 15386399
dec . 1 through dec . 31: 15035949
total: n/a

[a] total number of shares purchased during the quarter includes approximately 105978 shares delivered or attested to upc by employees to pay stock option exercise prices , satisfy excess tax withholding obligations for stock option exercises or vesting of retention units , and pay withholding obligations for vesting of retention shares . [b] on april 1 , 2011 , our board of directors authorized the repurchase of up to 40 million shares of our common stock by march 31 , 2014 . these repurchases may be made on the open market or through other transactions . our management has sole discretion with respect to determining the timing and amount of these transactions. .

Questions:
what was the number of shares authorized for repurchase?
what is that times 1000000?
what is the ratio of shares repurchased to those authorized?

Answers:
40
40000000
34.5%
stock performance graph the following graph sets forth the cumulative total shareholder return on our series a common stock , series b common stock and series c common stock as compared with the cumulative total return of the companies listed in the standard and poor 2019s 500 stock index ( 201cs&p 500 index 201d ) and a peer group of companies comprised of cbs corporation class b common stock , news corporation class a common stock , scripps network interactive , inc. , time warner , inc. , viacom , inc . class b common stock and the walt disney company . the graph assumes $ 100 originally invested on september 18 , 2008 , the date upon which our common stock began trading , in each of our series a common stock , series b common stock and series c common stock , the s&p 500 index , and the stock of our peer group companies , including reinvestment of dividends , for the period september 18 , 2008 through december 31 , 2008 and the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2010 , 2011 , and 2012 . december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 .

december 312008: disca: 102.53
discb: 78.53
disck: 83.69
s&p 500: 74.86
peer group: 68.79
december 312009: disca: 222.09
discb: 162.82
disck: 165.75
s&p 500: 92.42
peer group: 100.7
december 312010: disca: 301.96
discb: 225.95
disck: 229.31
s&p 500: 104.24
peer group: 121.35
december 312011: disca: 296.67
discb: 217.56
disck: 235.63
s&p 500: 104.23
peer group: 138.19
december 312012: disca: 459.67
discb: 327.11
disck: 365.63
s&p 500: 118.21
peer group: 190.58

equity compensation plan information information regarding securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans will be set forth in our definitive proxy statement for our 2013 annual meeting of stockholders under the caption 201csecurities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans , 201d which is incorporated herein by reference. .

Questions:
combined, what was the price of discb and disck for 12/31/12
and the average of these?

Answers:
692.74
346.37
sales of unregistered securities not applicable . repurchases of equity securities the following table provides information regarding our purchases of our equity securities during the period from october 1 , 2017 to december 31 , 2017 . total number of shares ( or units ) purchased 1 average price paid per share ( or unit ) 2 total number of shares ( or units ) purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs 3 maximum number ( or approximate dollar value ) of shares ( or units ) that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs 3 .

total number ofshares ( or units ) purchased1: october 1 - 31: 1231868
november 1 - 30: 1723139
december 1 - 31: 1295639
total: 4250646
average price paidper share ( or unit ) 2: october 1 - 31: 20.74
november 1 - 30: 18.89
december 1 - 31: 20.25
total: 19.84
total number ofshares ( or units ) purchased as part ofpublicly announcedplans or programs3: october 1 - 31: 1230394
november 1 - 30: 1722246
december 1 - 31: 1285000
total: 4237640
maximum number ( orapproximate dollar value ) of shares ( or units ) that may yet be purchasedunder the plans orprograms3: october 1 - 31: 214001430
november 1 - 30: 181474975
december 1 - 31: 155459545

1 included shares of our common stock , par value $ 0.10 per share , withheld under the terms of grants under employee stock-based compensation plans to offset tax withholding obligations that occurred upon vesting and release of restricted shares ( the 201cwithheld shares 201d ) . we repurchased 1474 withheld shares in october 2017 , 893 withheld shares in november 2017 and 10639 withheld shares in december 2017 , for a total of 13006 withheld shares during the three-month period . 2 the average price per share for each of the months in the fiscal quarter and for the three-month period was calculated by dividing the sum of the applicable period of the aggregate value of the tax withholding obligations and the aggregate amount we paid for shares acquired under our share repurchase program , described in note 5 to the consolidated financial statements , by the sum of the number of withheld shares and the number of shares acquired in our share repurchase program . 3 in february 2017 , the board authorized a share repurchase program to repurchase from time to time up to $ 300.0 million , excluding fees , of our common stock ( the 201c2017 share repurchase program 201d ) . on february 14 , 2018 , we announced that our board had approved a new share repurchase program to repurchase from time to time up to $ 300.0 million , excluding fees , of our common stock . the new authorization is in addition to any amounts remaining for repurchase under the 2017 share repurchase program . there is no expiration date associated with the share repurchase programs. .

Questions:
what is the total of withheld shares in the months of october and november, combined?
including december, what then becomes that total of withheld shares?
and what is the average of withheld shares between those three months?

Answers:
2367
13006
4335.3
part ii , item 8 fourth quarter of 2007 : 0160 schlumberger sold certain workover rigs for $ 32 million , resulting in a pretax gain of $ 24 million ( $ 17 million after-tax ) which is classified in interest and other income , net in the consolidated statement of income . 4 . acquisitions acquisition of eastern echo holding plc on december 10 , 2007 , schlumberger completed the acquisition of eastern echo holding plc ( 201ceastern echo 201d ) for $ 838 million in cash . eastern echo was a dubai-based marine seismic company that did not have any operations at the time of acquisition , but had signed contracts for the construction of six seismic vessels . the purchase price has been allocated to the net assets acquired based upon their estimated fair values as follows : ( stated in millions ) .

$ 266: other current assets: 23
fixed income investments held to maturity: 54
vessels under construction: 694
accounts payable and accrued liabilities: -17
long-term debt: -182
total purchase price: 838

other acquisitions schlumberger has made other acquisitions and minority interest investments , none of which were significant on an individual basis , for cash payments , net of cash acquired , of $ 514 million during 2009 , $ 345 million during 2008 , and $ 281 million during 2007 . pro forma results pertaining to the above acquisitions are not presented as the impact was not significant . 5 . drilling fluids joint venture the mi-swaco drilling fluids joint venture is owned 40% ( 40 % ) by schlumberger and 60% ( 60 % ) by smith international , inc . schlumberger records income relating to this venture using the equity method of accounting . the carrying value of schlumberger 2019s investment in the joint venture on december 31 , 2009 and 2008 was $ 1.4 billion and $ 1.3 billion , respectively , and is included within investments in affiliated companies on the consolidated balance sheet . schlumberger 2019s equity income from this joint venture was $ 131 million in 2009 , $ 210 million in 2008 and $ 178 million in 2007 . schlumberger received cash distributions from the joint venture of $ 106 million in 2009 , $ 57 million in 2008 and $ 46 million in 2007 . the joint venture agreement contains a provision under which either party to the joint venture may offer to sell its entire interest in the venture to the other party at a cash purchase price per percentage interest specified in an offer notice . if the offer to sell is not accepted , the offering party will be obligated to purchase the entire interest of the other party at the same price per percentage interest as the prices specified in the offer notice. .

Questions:
what percentage did the cash and short-term investments represent in relation to the total purchase price?
and what was the total debt?
what was the total asset value?
how much, then, did the debt represent in relation to this value?

Answers:
31.7%
199
1037
0.19