sharick008/convfinqa huggingface dataset:
entergy corporation and subsidiaries notes to financial statements liability to $ 60 million , and recorded the $ 2.7 million difference as a credit to interest expense . the $ 60 million remaining liability was eliminated upon payment of the cash portion of the purchase price . as of december 31 , 2016 , entergy louisiana , in connection with the waterford 3 lease obligation , had a future minimum lease payment ( reflecting an interest rate of 8.09% ( 8.09 % ) ) of $ 57.5 million , including $ 2.3 million in interest , due january 2017 that is recorded as long-term debt . in february 2017 the leases were terminated and the leased assets were conveyed to entergy louisiana . grand gulf lease obligations in 1988 , in two separate but substantially identical transactions , system energy sold and leased back undivided ownership interests in grand gulf for the aggregate sum of $ 500 million . the initial term of the leases expired in july 2015 . system energy renewed the leases for fair market value with renewal terms expiring in july 2036 . at the end of the new lease renewal terms , system energy has the option to repurchase the leased interests in grand gulf or renew the leases at fair market value . in the event that system energy does not renew or purchase the interests , system energy would surrender such interests and their associated entitlement of grand gulf 2019s capacity and energy . system energy is required to report the sale-leaseback as a financing transaction in its financial statements . for financial reporting purposes , system energy expenses the interest portion of the lease obligation and the plant depreciation . however , operating revenues include the recovery of the lease payments because the transactions are accounted for as a sale and leaseback for ratemaking purposes . consistent with a recommendation contained in a ferc audit report , system energy initially recorded as a net regulatory asset the difference between the recovery of the lease payments and the amounts expensed for interest and depreciation and continues to record this difference as a regulatory asset or liability on an ongoing basis , resulting in a zero net balance for the regulatory asset at the end of the lease term . the amount was a net regulatory liability of $ 55.6 million and $ 55.6 million as of december 31 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . as of december 31 , 2016 , system energy , in connection with the grand gulf sale and leaseback transactions , had future minimum lease payments ( reflecting an implicit rate of 5.13% ( 5.13 % ) ) that are recorded as long-term debt , as follows : amount ( in thousands ) .

amount ( in thousands ): 2017: 17188
2018: 17188
2019: 17188
2020: 17188
2021: 17188
years thereafter: 257812
total: 343752
less : amount representing interest: 309393
present value of net minimum lease payments: 34359

.

Questions:
what is the implicit interest cost rate?
what is the rate divided by 100?
what is the value of lease payments due after 2021?
what is the product of the rate and those payments?

Answers:
5.13
.0513
257812
13225.7
performance graph comparison of five-year cumulative total return the following graph and table compare the cumulative total return on citi 2019s common stock , which is listed on the nyse under the ticker symbol 201cc 201d and held by 77787 common stockholders of record as of january 31 , 2017 , with the cumulative total return of the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index over the five-year period through december 31 , 2016 . the graph and table assume that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2011 in citi 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index , and that all dividends were reinvested . comparison of five-year cumulative total return for the years ended date citi s&p 500 financials .

citi: 31-dec-2011: 100
31-dec-2012: 150.6
31-dec-2013: 198.5
31-dec-2014: 206.3
31-dec-2015: 197.8
31-dec-2016: 229.3
s&p 500: 31-dec-2011: 100
31-dec-2012: 116
31-dec-2013: 153.6
31-dec-2014: 174.6
31-dec-2015: 177
31-dec-2016: 198.2
s&p financials: 31-dec-2011: 100
31-dec-2012: 128.8
31-dec-2013: 174.7
31-dec-2014: 201.3
31-dec-2015: 198.2
31-dec-2016: 243.4

.

Questions:
what was the value of citi common stock in 2016?
what was the 2016 value less an assumed $100 initial investment?
what is the difference divided by the original assumed investment?

Answers:
229.3
129.3
129.3%
the following is a schedule of future minimum rental payments required under long-term operating leases at october 29 , 2011 : fiscal years operating leases .

operating leases: 2012: 17590
2013: 12724
2014: 6951
2015: 5649
2016: 3669
later years: 19472
total: 66055

12 . commitments and contingencies from time to time in the ordinary course of the company 2019s business , various claims , charges and litigation are asserted or commenced against the company arising from , or related to , contractual matters , patents , trademarks , personal injury , environmental matters , product liability , insurance coverage and personnel and employment disputes . as to such claims and litigation , the company can give no assurance that it will prevail . the company does not believe that any current legal matters will have a material adverse effect on the company 2019s financial position , results of operations or cash flows . 13 . retirement plans the company and its subsidiaries have various savings and retirement plans covering substantially all employees . the company maintains a defined contribution plan for the benefit of its eligible u.s . employees . this plan provides for company contributions of up to 5% ( 5 % ) of each participant 2019s total eligible compensation . in addition , the company contributes an amount equal to each participant 2019s pre-tax contribution , if any , up to a maximum of 3% ( 3 % ) of each participant 2019s total eligible compensation . the total expense related to the defined contribution plan for u.s . employees was $ 21.9 million in fiscal 2011 , $ 20.5 million in fiscal 2010 and $ 21.5 million in fiscal 2009 . the company also has various defined benefit pension and other retirement plans for certain non-u.s . employees that are consistent with local statutory requirements and practices . the total expense related to the various defined benefit pension and other retirement plans for certain non-u.s . employees was $ 21.4 million in fiscal 2011 , $ 11.7 million in fiscal 2010 and $ 10.9 million in fiscal 2009 . non-u.s . plan disclosures the company 2019s funding policy for its foreign defined benefit pension plans is consistent with the local requirements of each country . the plans 2019 assets consist primarily of u.s . and non-u.s . equity securities , bonds , property and cash . the benefit obligations and related assets under these plans have been measured at october 29 , 2011 and october 30 , 2010 . analog devices , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) .

Questions:
what is the net change in e total expense related to the defined contribution plan for u.s.employees from 2010 to 2011?
what is the total expense related to the defined contribution plan for u.s.employees in 2010?
what growth rate does this represent?

Answers:
1.4
20.5
6.8%
entergy mississippi , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis results of operations net income 2008 compared to 2007 net income decreased $ 12.4 million primarily due to higher other operation and maintenance expenses , lower other income , and higher depreciation and amortization expenses , partially offset by higher net revenue . 2007 compared to 2006 net income increased $ 19.8 million primarily due to higher net revenue , lower other operation and maintenance expenses , higher other income , and lower interest expense , partially offset by higher depreciation and amortization expenses . net revenue 2008 compared to 2007 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2008 to 2007 . amount ( in millions ) .

amount ( in millions ): 2007 net revenue: 486.9
attala costs: 9.9
rider revenue: 6
base revenue: 5.1
reserve equalization: -2.4
net wholesale revenue: -4
other: -2.7
2008 net revenue: 498.8

the attala costs variance is primarily due to an increase in the attala power plant costs that are recovered through the power management rider . the net income effect of this recovery in limited to a portion representing an allowed return on equity with the remainder offset by attala power plant costs in other operation and maintenance expenses , depreciation expenses , and taxes other than income taxes . the recovery of attala power plant costs is discussed further in "liquidity and capital resources - uses of capital" below . the rider revenue variance is the result of a storm damage rider that became effective in october 2007 . the establishment of this rider results in an increase in rider revenue and a corresponding increase in other operation and maintenance expense for the storm reserve with no effect on net income . the base revenue variance is primarily due to a formula rate plan increase effective july 2007 . the formula rate plan filing is discussed further in "state and local rate regulation" below . the reserve equalization variance is primarily due to changes in the entergy system generation mix compared to the same period in 2007. .

Questions:
what was the change in the net revenue from 2007 to 2008?
and what percentage of this change was due to rider revenue?
and what was this change as a portion of that net revenue in 2007?

Answers:
11.9
50.4%
2.4%
the agencies consider many factors in determining the final rating of an insurance company . one consideration is the relative level of statutory surplus necessary to support the business written . statutory surplus represents the capital of the insurance company reported in accordance with accounting practices prescribed by the applicable state insurance department . see part i , item 1a . risk factors 2014 201cdowngrades in our financial strength or credit ratings , which may make our products less attractive , could increase our cost of capital and inhibit our ability to refinance our debt , which would have a material adverse effect on our business , financial condition , results of operations and liquidity . 201d statutory surplus the table below sets forth statutory surplus for the company 2019s insurance companies as of december 31 , 2014 and 2013: .

2014: u.s . life insurance subsidiaries includes domestic captive insurance subsidiaries in 2013: 7157
property and casualty insurance subsidiaries: 8069
total: 15226
2013: u.s . life insurance subsidiaries includes domestic captive insurance subsidiaries in 2013: 6639
property and casualty insurance subsidiaries: 8022
total: 14661

statutory capital and surplus for the u.s . life insurance subsidiaries , including domestic captive insurance subsidiaries in 2013 , increased by $ 518 , primarily due to variable annuity surplus impacts of $ 788 , net income from non-variable annuity business of $ 187 , increases in unrealized gains from other invested assets carrying values of $ 138 , partially offset by returns of capital of $ 500 , and changes in reserves on account of change in valuation basis of $ 100 . effective april 30 , 2014 the last domestic captive ceased operations . statutory capital and surplus for the property and casualty insurance increased by $ 47 , primarily due to statutory net income of $ 1.1 billion , and unrealized gains on investments of $ 1.4 billion , largely offset by dividends to the hfsg holding company of $ 2.5 billion . the company also held regulatory capital and surplus for its former operations in japan until the sale of those operations on june 30 , 2014 . under the accounting practices and procedures governed by japanese regulatory authorities , the company 2019s statutory capital and surplus was $ 1.2 billion as of december 31 , 2013. .

Questions:
what is the sum of u.s . life insurance subsidiaries includes domestic captive insurance subsidiaries in 2013 and 2014?
what is the average for these years?

Answers:
13796
6898
federal realty investment trust schedule iii summary of real estate and accumulated depreciation 2014continued three years ended december 31 , 2006 reconciliation of accumulated depreciation and amortization ( in thousands ) .

$ 514177: additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense: 89564
deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property: -12807
balance december 31 2004: 595338
balance december 31 2005: 663750
balance december 31 2006: 740507

.

Questions:
what was the ratio of the additions in 2005 to the ones in 2004?
and what is the difference between this value and the number one?
and in the previous year of this period, what was the total of deductions?
what was it in 2004?
what was, then, the combined total for both years?
including 2006, what becomes this total?
and what were the average deductions between the three years?

Answers:
1.0133
1.33%
1390
15244
16634
29441
9813.66
entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis the volume/weather variance is primarily due to an increase of 1402 gwh , or 1% ( 1 % ) , in billed electricity usage , including an increase in industrial usage and the effect of more favorable weather . the increase in industrial sales was primarily due to expansion in the chemicals industry and the addition of new customers , partially offset by decreased demand primarily due to extended maintenance outages for existing chemicals customers . the waterford 3 replacement steam generator provision is due to a regulatory charge of approximately $ 32 million recorded in 2015 related to the uncertainty associated with the resolution of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator project . see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding . the miso deferral variance is primarily due to the deferral in 2014 of non-fuel miso-related charges , as approved by the lpsc and the mpsc . the deferral of non-fuel miso-related charges is partially offset in other operation and maintenance expenses . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the recovery of non-fuel miso-related charges . the louisiana business combination customer credits variance is due to a regulatory liability of $ 107 million recorded by entergy in october 2015 as a result of the entergy gulf states louisiana and entergy louisiana business combination . consistent with the terms of the stipulated settlement in the business combination proceeding , electric customers of entergy louisiana will realize customer credits associated with the business combination ; accordingly , in october 2015 , entergy recorded a regulatory liability of $ 107 million ( $ 66 million net-of-tax ) . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the business combination and customer credits . entergy wholesale commodities following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2015 to 2014 . amount ( in millions ) .

amount ( in millions ): 2014 net revenue: 2224
nuclear realized price changes: -310
vermont yankee shutdown in december 2014: -305
nuclear volume excluding vermont yankee effect: 20
other: 37
2015 net revenue: 1666

as shown in the table above , net revenue for entergy wholesale commodities decreased by approximately $ 558 million in 2016 primarily due to : 2022 lower realized wholesale energy prices , primarily due to significantly higher northeast market power prices in 2014 , and lower capacity prices in 2015 ; and 2022 a decrease in net revenue as a result of vermont yankee ceasing power production in december 2014 . the decrease was partially offset by higher volume in the entergy wholesale commodities nuclear fleet , excluding vermont yankee , resulting from fewer refueling outage days in 2015 as compared to 2014 , partially offset by more unplanned outage days in 2015 as compared to 2014. .

Questions:
what was the 2015 net revenue?
and in 2014?
so what was the change in this value between the two years?
and the growth rate during this time?

Answers:
1666
2224
-558
-25.1%
table of contents capital deployment program will be subject to market and economic conditions , applicable legal requirements and other relevant factors . our capital deployment program does not obligate us to continue a dividend for any fixed period , and payment of dividends may be suspended at any time at our discretion . stock performance graph the following stock performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or 201cfiled 201d with the securities and exchange commission , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filings under the securities act of 1933 or the exchange act , each as amended , except to the extent that we specifically incorporate it by reference into such filing . the following stock performance graph compares our cumulative total stockholder return on an annual basis on our common stock with the cumulative total return on the standard and poor 2019s 500 stock index and the amex airline index from december 9 , 2013 ( the first trading day of aag common stock ) through december 31 , 2015 . the comparison assumes $ 100 was invested on december 9 , 2013 in aag common stock and in each of the foregoing indices and assumes reinvestment of dividends . the stock performance shown on the graph below represents historical stock performance and is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance. .

12/9/2013: american airlines group inc .: 100
amex airline index: 100
s&p 500: 100
12/31/2013: american airlines group inc .: 103
amex airline index: 102
s&p 500: 102
12/31/2014: american airlines group inc .: 219
amex airline index: 152
s&p 500: 114
12/31/2015: american airlines group inc .: 175
amex airline index: 127
s&p 500: 113

purchases of equity securities by the issuer and affiliated purchasers since july 2014 , our board of directors has approved several share repurchase programs aggregating $ 7.0 billion of authority of which , as of december 31 , 2015 , $ 2.4 billion remained unused under repurchase programs .

Questions:
what is the value of an investment in american airlines group in 2015?
what about in 2014?
what is the net change from 2014 to 2015?
what percentage change does this represent?
what about the net change in value of an investment in amex airline index	from 2013 to 2014?
what is the value of the investment in 2013?
what percentage change does this represent?

Answers:
175
219
-44
-20%
50
102
49%
state street corporation | 52 shareholder return performance presentation the graph presented below compares the cumulative total shareholder return on state street's common stock to the cumulative total return of the s&p 500 index , the s&p financial index and the kbw bank index over a five-year period . the cumulative total shareholder return assumes the investment of $ 100 in state street common stock and in each index on december 31 , 2012 . it also assumes reinvestment of common stock dividends . the s&p financial index is a publicly available , capitalization-weighted index , comprised of 67 of the standard & poor 2019s 500 companies , representing 27 diversified financial services companies , 23 insurance companies , and 17 banking companies . the kbw bank index is a modified cap-weighted index consisting of 24 exchange-listed stocks , representing national money center banks and leading regional institutions. .

2012: state street corporation: 100
s&p 500 index: 100
s&p financial index: 100
kbw bank index: 100
2013: state street corporation: 159
s&p 500 index: 132
s&p financial index: 136
kbw bank index: 138
2014: state street corporation: 172
s&p 500 index: 151
s&p financial index: 156
kbw bank index: 151
2015: state street corporation: 148
s&p 500 index: 153
s&p financial index: 154
kbw bank index: 151
2016: state street corporation: 178
s&p 500 index: 171
s&p financial index: 189
kbw bank index: 195
2017: state street corporation: 227
s&p 500 index: 208
s&p financial index: 230
kbw bank index: 231

.

Questions:
what was the value of state street in 2015?
what was the value in 2012?
what was the net change in value?
what was the 2012 value?
what is the net change divided by the 2012 value?

Answers:
148
100
48
100
48%
performance graph the following graph compares the yearly change in the cumulative total stockholder return for our last five full fiscal years , based upon the market price of our common stock , with the cumulative total return on a nasdaq composite index ( u.s . companies ) and a peer group , the nasdaq medical equipment-sic code 3840-3849 index , which is comprised of medical equipment companies , for that period . the performance graph assumes the investment of $ 100 on march 31 , 2010 in our common stock , the nasdaq composite index ( u.s . companies ) and the peer group index , and the reinvestment of any and all dividends. .

3/31/2010: abiomed inc: 100
nasdaq composite index: 100
nasdaq medical equipment sic code 3840-3849: 100
3/31/2011: abiomed inc: 140.79
nasdaq composite index: 115.98
nasdaq medical equipment sic code 3840-3849: 108.31
3/31/2012: abiomed inc: 215.02
nasdaq composite index: 128.93
nasdaq medical equipment sic code 3840-3849: 115.05
3/31/2013: abiomed inc: 180.91
nasdaq composite index: 136.26
nasdaq medical equipment sic code 3840-3849: 105.56
3/31/2014: abiomed inc: 252.33
nasdaq composite index: 175.11
nasdaq medical equipment sic code 3840-3849: 123.18
3/31/2015: abiomed inc: 693.6
nasdaq composite index: 204.38
nasdaq medical equipment sic code 3840-3849: 118.95

this graph is not 201csoliciting material 201d under regulation 14a or 14c of the rules promulgated under the securities exchange act of 1934 , is not deemed filed with the securities and exchange commission and is not to be incorporated by reference in any of our filings under the securities act of 1933 , as amended , or the exchange act whether made before or after the date hereof and irrespective of any general incorporation language in any such filing . transfer agent american stock transfer & trust company , 59 maiden lane , new york , ny 10038 , is our stock transfer agent. .

Questions:
what is the value of abiomed inc in 2013?
what was the value in 2010?
what is the net change in price?
what is that divided by 100?

Answers:
180.91
100
80.91
80.9%
stock performance graph the following graph provides a comparison of five year cumulative total stockholder returns of teleflex common stock , the standard a0& poor 2019s ( s&p ) 500 stock index and the s&p 500 healthcare equipment & supply index . the annual changes for the five-year period shown on the graph are based on the assumption that $ 100 had been invested in teleflex common stock and each index on december a031 , 2012 and that all dividends were reinvested . market performance .

2012: teleflex incorporated: 100
s&p 500 index: 100
s&p 500 healthcare equipment & supply index: 100
2013: teleflex incorporated: 134
s&p 500 index: 132
s&p 500 healthcare equipment & supply index: 128
2014: teleflex incorporated: 166
s&p 500 index: 151
s&p 500 healthcare equipment & supply index: 161
2015: teleflex incorporated: 192
s&p 500 index: 153
s&p 500 healthcare equipment & supply index: 171
2016: teleflex incorporated: 237
s&p 500 index: 171
s&p 500 healthcare equipment & supply index: 181
2017: teleflex incorporated: 368
s&p 500 index: 208
s&p 500 healthcare equipment & supply index: 238

s&p 500 healthcare equipment & supply index 100 128 161 171 181 238 .

Questions:
what was the price of teleflex in 2017?
what was the price of teleflex in 2012?
what is the net change in price?
what was the price of teleflex in 2012?
what is the percent change, or roi?

Answers:
368
100
268
100
268%