sharick008/convfinqa huggingface dataset:
company stock performance the following graph shows a five-year comparison of cumulative total shareholder return , calculated on a dividend reinvested basis , for the company , the s&p 500 composite index , the s&p computer hardware index , and the dow jones u.s . technology index . the graph assumes $ 100 was invested in each of the company 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 composite index , the s&p computer hardware index , and the dow jones u.s . technology index as of the market close on september 30 , 2007 . data points on the graph are annual . note that historic stock price performance is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance . sep-11sep-10sep-09sep-08sep-07 sep-12 apple inc . s&p 500 s&p computer hardware dow jones us technology comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among apple inc. , the s&p 500 index , the s&p computer hardware index , and the dow jones us technology index *$ 100 invested on 9/30/07 in stock or index , including reinvestment of dividends . fiscal year ending september 30 . copyright a9 2012 s&p , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . september 30 , september 30 , september 30 , september 30 , september 30 , september 30 .

september 30 2007: apple inc .: 100
s&p 500: 100
s&p computer hardware: 100
dow jones us technology: 100
september 30 2008: apple inc .: 74
s&p 500: 78
s&p computer hardware: 84
dow jones us technology: 76
september 30 2009: apple inc .: 121
s&p 500: 73
s&p computer hardware: 99
dow jones us technology: 85
september 30 2010: apple inc .: 185
s&p 500: 80
s&p computer hardware: 118
dow jones us technology: 95
september 30 2011: apple inc .: 248
s&p 500: 81
s&p computer hardware: 134
dow jones us technology: 98
september 30 2012: apple inc .: 437
s&p 500: 105
s&p computer hardware: 214
dow jones us technology: 127

.

Questions:
what was the change in the performance price of the apple inc . from 2007 to 2012?
and how much did this change represent in relation to that performance price in 2007?
in that same period, what was that change for the s&p 500?

Answers:
337
337%
5
table of contents company stock performance the following graph shows a comparison of cumulative total shareholder return , calculated on a dividend reinvested basis , for the company , the s&p 500 index , the s&p information technology index and the dow jones u.s . technology supersector index for the five years ended september 26 , 2015 . the graph assumes $ 100 was invested in each of the company 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index , the s&p information technology index and the dow jones u.s . technology supersector index as of the market close on september 24 , 2010 . note that historic stock price performance is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance . * $ 100 invested on 9/25/10 in stock or index , including reinvestment of dividends . data points are the last day of each fiscal year for the company 2019scommon stock and september 30th for indexes . copyright a9 2015 s&p , a division of mcgraw hill financial . all rights reserved . copyright a9 2015 dow jones & co . all rights reserved . september september september september september september .

september 2010: apple inc .: 100
s&p 500 index: 100
s&p information technology index: 100
dow jones u.s . technology supersector index: 100
september 2011: apple inc .: 138
s&p 500 index: 101
s&p information technology index: 104
dow jones u.s . technology supersector index: 103
september 2012: apple inc .: 229
s&p 500 index: 132
s&p information technology index: 137
dow jones u.s . technology supersector index: 134
september 2013: apple inc .: 170
s&p 500 index: 157
s&p information technology index: 147
dow jones u.s . technology supersector index: 141
september 2014: apple inc .: 254
s&p 500 index: 188
s&p information technology index: 190
dow jones u.s . technology supersector index: 183
september 2015: apple inc .: 294
s&p 500 index: 187
s&p information technology index: 194
dow jones u.s . technology supersector index: 183

apple inc . | 2015 form 10-k | 21 .

Questions:
what was the value of apple inc in 2014?
what was the initial investment amount?
what is the net change?
what was the initial investment?
what is the percent change?

Answers:
254
100
154
100
154%
2006 plan prior to december 5 , 2008 became fully vested and nonforfeitable upon the closing of the acquisition . awards may be granted under the 2006 plan , as amended and restated , after december 5 , 2008 only to employees and consultants of allied waste industries , inc . and its subsidiaries who were not employed by republic services , inc . prior to such date . at december 31 , 2010 , there were approximately 15.3 million shares of common stock reserved for future grants under the 2006 plan . stock options we use a binomial option-pricing model to value our stock option grants . we recognize compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for each separately vesting portion of the award , or to the employee 2019s retirement eligible date , if earlier . expected volatility is based on the weighted average of the most recent one-year volatility and a historical rolling average volatility of our stock over the expected life of the option . the risk-free interest rate is based on federal reserve rates in effect for bonds with maturity dates equal to the expected term of the option . we use historical data to estimate future option exercises , forfeitures and expected life of the options . when appropriate , separate groups of employees that have similar historical exercise behavior are considered separately for valuation purposes . the weighted-average estimated fair values of stock options granted during the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and 2008 were $ 5.28 , $ 3.79 and $ 4.36 per option , respectively , which were calculated using the following weighted-average assumptions: .

2010: expected volatility: -28.6
risk-free interest rate: -2.4
dividend yield: -2.9
expected life ( in years ): 4.3
contractual life ( in years ): 7
expected forfeiture rate: -3
2009: expected volatility: -28.7
risk-free interest rate: -1.4
dividend yield: -3.1
expected life ( in years ): 4.2
contractual life ( in years ): 7
expected forfeiture rate: -3
2008: expected volatility: -27.3
risk-free interest rate: -1.7
dividend yield: -2.9
expected life ( in years ): 4.2
contractual life ( in years ): 7
expected forfeiture rate: -3

republic services , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements , continued .

Questions:
what was the change in the weighted-average estimated fair values of stock options granted from 2009 to 2010?
and how much does this change represent in relation to those estimated fair values in 2009, in percentage?

Answers:
1.49
39.3%
apple inc . | 2016 form 10-k | 20 company stock performance the following graph shows a comparison of cumulative total shareholder return , calculated on a dividend reinvested basis , for the company , the s&p 500 index , the s&p information technology index and the dow jones u.s . technology supersector index for the five years ended september 24 , 2016 . the graph assumes $ 100 was invested in each of the company 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index , the s&p information technology index and the dow jones u.s . technology supersector index as of the market close on september 23 , 2011 . note that historic stock price performance is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance . * $ 100 invested on 9/23/11 in stock or index , including reinvestment of dividends . data points are the last day of each fiscal year for the company 2019s common stock and september 30th for indexes . copyright a9 2016 s&p , a division of mcgraw hill financial . all rights reserved . copyright a9 2016 dow jones & co . all rights reserved . september september september september september september .

september2011: apple inc .: 100
s&p 500 index: 100
s&p information technology index: 100
dow jones u.s . technology supersector index: 100
september2012: apple inc .: 166
s&p 500 index: 130
s&p information technology index: 132
dow jones u.s . technology supersector index: 130
september2013: apple inc .: 123
s&p 500 index: 155
s&p information technology index: 142
dow jones u.s . technology supersector index: 137
september2014: apple inc .: 183
s&p 500 index: 186
s&p information technology index: 183
dow jones u.s . technology supersector index: 178
september2015: apple inc .: 212
s&p 500 index: 185
s&p information technology index: 187
dow jones u.s . technology supersector index: 177
september2016: apple inc .: 213
s&p 500 index: 213
s&p information technology index: 230
dow jones u.s . technology supersector index: 217

.

Questions:
what was the value of apple inc. in 2014?
and what was it in 2013?
what was, then, the change in value from 2013 to 2014?
and how much does that change represent in relation to the 2013 apple inc. value?

Answers:
183
123
60
49%
( 1 ) includes shares repurchased through our publicly announced share repurchase program and shares tendered to pay the exercise price and tax withholding on employee stock options . shareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the securities and exchange commission , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates such information by reference into such filing . the following graph shows a five-year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the s&p 500 index , and the dow jones transportation average . the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2004 in the s&p 500 index , the dow jones transportation average , and our class b common stock . comparison of five year cumulative total return $ 40.00 $ 60.00 $ 80.00 $ 100.00 $ 120.00 $ 140.00 $ 160.00 2004 20092008200720062005 s&p 500 ups dj transport .

12/31/04: united parcel service inc .: 100
s&p 500 index: 100
dow jones transportation average: 100
12/31/05: united parcel service inc .: 89.49
s&p 500 index: 104.91
dow jones transportation average: 111.65
12/31/06: united parcel service inc .: 91.06
s&p 500 index: 121.48
dow jones transportation average: 122.61
12/31/07: united parcel service inc .: 87.88
s&p 500 index: 128.15
dow jones transportation average: 124.35
12/31/08: united parcel service inc .: 70.48
s&p 500 index: 80.74
dow jones transportation average: 97.72
12/31/09: united parcel service inc .: 75.95
s&p 500 index: 102.11
dow jones transportation average: 115.88

.

Questions:
what was the value of united parcel service inc. in 2019?
what is the change in value assuming a $100 initial investment?
what is the percent change?

Answers:
75.95
-24.05
-24.05%
table of contents performance graph the following graph compares the total return , assuming reinvestment of dividends , on an investment in the company , based on performance of the company's common stock , with the total return of the standard & poor's 500 composite stock index ( "s&p 500" ) and the dow jones united states travel and leisure index for a five year period by measuring the changes in common stock prices from december 31 , 2013 to december 31 , 2018. .

12/13: royal caribbean cruises ltd .: 100
s&p 500: 100
dow jones u.s . travel & leisure: 100
12/14: royal caribbean cruises ltd .: 176.94
s&p 500: 113.69
dow jones u.s . travel & leisure: 116.37
12/15: royal caribbean cruises ltd .: 220.72
s&p 500: 115.26
dow jones u.s . travel & leisure: 123.23
12/16: royal caribbean cruises ltd .: 182.99
s&p 500: 129.05
dow jones u.s . travel & leisure: 132.56
12/17: royal caribbean cruises ltd .: 271.25
s&p 500: 157.22
dow jones u.s . travel & leisure: 164.13
12/18: royal caribbean cruises ltd .: 227.46
s&p 500: 150.33
dow jones u.s . travel & leisure: 154.95

the stock performance graph assumes for comparison that the value of the company's common stock and of each index was $ 100 on december 31 , 2013 and that all dividends were reinvested . past performance is not necessarily an indicator of future results. .

Questions:
what was the price of royal caribbean cruises ltd. on 12/15?
and in 12/14?
how much did the price change between these dates?
and the percentage growth in price over this year?

Answers:
220.72
176.94
43.78
24.7%
12 . brokerage receivables and brokerage payables citi has receivables and payables for financial instruments sold to and purchased from brokers , dealers and customers , which arise in the ordinary course of business . citi is exposed to risk of loss from the inability of brokers , dealers or customers to pay for purchases or to deliver the financial instruments sold , in which case citi would have to sell or purchase the financial instruments at prevailing market prices . credit risk is reduced to the extent that an exchange or clearing organization acts as a counterparty to the transaction and replaces the broker , dealer or customer in question . citi seeks to protect itself from the risks associated with customer activities by requiring customers to maintain margin collateral in compliance with regulatory and internal guidelines . margin levels are monitored daily , and customers deposit additional collateral as required . where customers cannot meet collateral requirements , citi may liquidate sufficient underlying financial instruments to bring the customer into compliance with the required margin level . exposure to credit risk is impacted by market volatility , which may impair the ability of clients to satisfy their obligations to citi . credit limits are established and closely monitored for customers and for brokers and dealers engaged in forwards , futures and other transactions deemed to be credit sensitive . brokerage receivables and brokerage payables consisted of the following: .

december 31 , 2017: receivables from customers: 19215
receivables from brokers dealers and clearing organizations: 19169
total brokerage receivables ( 1 ): 38384
payables to customers: 38741
payables to brokers dealers and clearing organizations: 22601
total brokerage payables ( 1 ): 61342
december 31 , 2016: receivables from customers: 10374
receivables from brokers dealers and clearing organizations: 18513
total brokerage receivables ( 1 ): 28887
payables to customers: 37237
payables to brokers dealers and clearing organizations: 19915
total brokerage payables ( 1 ): 57152

payables to brokers , dealers and clearing organizations 22601 19915 total brokerage payables ( 1 ) $ 61342 $ 57152 ( 1 ) includes brokerage receivables and payables recorded by citi broker- dealer entities that are accounted for in accordance with the aicpa accounting guide for brokers and dealers in securities as codified in asc 940-320. .

Questions:
what were the total brokerage payables in 2017?
and what were they in 2016?
what was, then, the change over the year?
what were the total brokerage payables in 2016?
and how much does that change represent in relation to these 2016 brokerage payables, in percentage?

Answers:
61342
57152
4190
57152
7.3%
republic services , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) in december 2008 , the board of directors amended and restated the republic services , inc . 2006 incentive stock plan ( formerly known as the allied waste industries , inc . 2006 incentive stock plan ( the 2006 plan ) ) . allied 2019s shareholders approved the 2006 plan in may 2006 . the 2006 plan was amended and restated in december 2008 to reflect republic as the new sponsor of the plan , and that any references to shares of common stock are to shares of common stock of republic , and to adjust outstanding awards and the number of shares available under the plan to reflect the allied acquisition . the 2006 plan , as amended and restated , provided for the grant of non- qualified stock options , incentive stock options , shares of restricted stock , shares of phantom stock , stock bonuses , restricted stock units , stock appreciation rights , performance awards , dividend equivalents , cash awards , or other stock-based awards . awards granted under the 2006 plan prior to december 5 , 2008 became fully vested and nonforfeitable upon the closing of the allied acquisition . no further awards will be made under the 2006 stock options we use a lattice binomial option-pricing model to value our stock option grants . we recognize compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for each separately vesting portion of the award , or to the employee 2019s retirement eligible date , if earlier . expected volatility is based on the weighted average of the most recent one year volatility and a historical rolling average volatility of our stock over the expected life of the option . the risk-free interest rate is based on federal reserve rates in effect for bonds with maturity dates equal to the expected term of the option . we use historical data to estimate future option exercises , forfeitures ( at 3.0% ( 3.0 % ) for each of the periods presented ) and expected life of the options . when appropriate , separate groups of employees that have similar historical exercise behavior are considered separately for valuation purposes . the weighted-average estimated fair values of stock options granted during the years ended december 31 , 2014 , 2013 and 2012 were $ 5.74 , $ 5.27 and $ 4.77 per option , respectively , which were calculated using the following weighted-average assumptions: .

2014: expected volatility: -27.5
risk-free interest rate: -1.4
dividend yield: -3.2
expected life ( in years ): 4.6
contractual life ( in years ): 7
2013: expected volatility: -28.9
risk-free interest rate: -0.7
dividend yield: -3.2
expected life ( in years ): 4.5
contractual life ( in years ): 7
2012: expected volatility: -27.8
risk-free interest rate: -0.8
dividend yield: -3.2
expected life ( in years ): 4.5
contractual life ( in years ): 7

.

Questions:
what was the difference in weighted-average estimated fair values of stock options granted between 2013 and 2014?
and the value specifically for 2013?
and the percentage change during this time?

Answers:
0.47
5.27
8.9%
table of contents stock performance graph the following stock performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or 201cfiled 201d with the securities and exchange commission , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filings under the securities act of 1933 or the exchange act , each as amended , except to the extent that we specifically incorporate it by reference into such filing . the following stock performance graph compares our cumulative total shareholder return on an annual basis on our common stock with the cumulative total return on the standard and poor 2019s 500 stock index and the amex airline index from december 9 , 2013 ( the first trading day of aag common stock ) through december 31 , 2014 . the comparison assumes $ 100 was invested on december 9 , 2013 in aag common stock and in each of the foregoing indices and assumes reinvestment of dividends . the stock performance shown on the graph below represents historical stock performance and is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance. .

12/9/2013: american airlines group inc .: 100
amex airline index: 100
s&p 500: 100
12/31/2013: american airlines group inc .: 103
amex airline index: 102
s&p 500: 102
12/31/2014: american airlines group inc .: 219
amex airline index: 152
s&p 500: 114

.

Questions:
what was the performance price of the american airlines group inc. in 2014?
and what was it in september 2013?
what was, then, the variation over the period?
and what is this variation as a portion of that 2013 price?
and throughout only the year of 2014, what was that variation for the amex airline index?
how much does it represent in relation to the price of that stock in the beginning of the year?

Answers:
219
100
119
119%
50
49%
vornado realty trust notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) 10 . redeemable noncontrolling interests - continued redeemable noncontrolling interests on our consolidated balance sheets are recorded at the greater of their carrying amount or redemption value at the end of each reporting period . changes in the value from period to period are charged to 201cadditional capital 201d in our consolidated statements of changes in equity . below is a table summarizing the activity of redeemable noncontrolling interests . ( amounts in thousands ) .

$ 1177978: net income: 55228
distributions: -53515
conversion of class a units into common shares at redemption value: -126764
adjustment to carry redeemable class a units at redemption value: 191826
other net: 22571
balance at december 31 2009: 1251628
redemption of series d-12 redeemable units: -13000
balance at december 31 2010: 1327974

as of december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , the aggregate redemption value of redeemable class a units was $ 1066974000 and $ 971628000 , respectively . redeemable noncontrolling interests exclude our series g convertible preferred units and series d-13 cumulative redeemable preferred units , as they are accounted for as liabilities in accordance with asc 480 , distinguishing liabilities and equity , because of their possible settlement by issuing a variable number of vornado common shares . accordingly the fair value of these units is included as a component of 201cother liabilities 201d on our consolidated balance sheets and aggregated $ 55097000 and $ 60271000 as of december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively. .

Questions:
what was the balance of redeemable non-controlling interests as of 12/31/09?
and as of 12/31/08?
so what was the change in this value between the two years?
and as a percentage of the original balance?

Answers:
1251628
1177978
73650
6.3%
shareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the sec , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates such information by reference into such filing . the following graph shows a five year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 index , and the dow jones transportation average . the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2010 in the standard & poor 2019s 500 index , the dow jones transportation average , and our class b common stock. .

12/31/2010: united parcel service inc .: 100
standard & poor 2019s 500 index: 100
dow jones transportation average: 100
12/31/2011: united parcel service inc .: 103.88
standard & poor 2019s 500 index: 102.11
dow jones transportation average: 100.01
12/31/2012: united parcel service inc .: 107.87
standard & poor 2019s 500 index: 118.43
dow jones transportation average: 107.49
12/31/2013: united parcel service inc .: 158.07
standard & poor 2019s 500 index: 156.77
dow jones transportation average: 151.97
12/31/2014: united parcel service inc .: 171.77
standard & poor 2019s 500 index: 178.22
dow jones transportation average: 190.08
12/31/2015: united parcel service inc .: 160.61
standard & poor 2019s 500 index: 180.67
dow jones transportation average: 158.23

.

Questions:
what was the change in the performance value of the ups class b common stock from 2010 to 2015?
and how much did this change represent in relation to that value in 2010?
how much is that representation in percentage?

Answers:
60.61
0.6061
60.61%