sharick008/convfinqa huggingface dataset:
included in the corporate and consumer loan tables above are purchased distressed loans , which are loans that have evidenced significant credit deterioration subsequent to origination but prior to acquisition by citigroup . in accordance with sop 03-3 , the difference between the total expected cash flows for these loans and the initial recorded investments is recognized in income over the life of the loans using a level yield . accordingly , these loans have been excluded from the impaired loan information presented above . in addition , per sop 03-3 , subsequent decreases to the expected cash flows for a purchased distressed loan require a build of an allowance so the loan retains its level yield . however , increases in the expected cash flows are first recognized as a reduction of any previously established allowance and then recognized as income prospectively over the remaining life of the loan by increasing the loan 2019s level yield . where the expected cash flows cannot be reliably estimated , the purchased distressed loan is accounted for under the cost recovery method . the carrying amount of the company 2019s purchased distressed loan portfolio at december 31 , 2010 was $ 392 million , net of an allowance of $ 77 million as of december 31 , 2010 . the changes in the accretable yield , related allowance and carrying amount net of accretable yield for 2010 are as follows : in millions of dollars accretable carrying amount of loan receivable allowance .

accretable yield: beginning balance: 27
purchases ( 1 ): 1
disposals/payments received: -11
accretion: -44
builds ( reductions ) to the allowance: 128
increase to expected cash flows: -2
fx/other: 17
balance at december 31 2010 ( 2 ): 116
carrying amount of loan receivable: beginning balance: 920
purchases ( 1 ): 130
disposals/payments received: -594
accretion: 44
builds ( reductions ) to the allowance: 2014
increase to expected cash flows: 19
fx/other: -50
balance at december 31 2010 ( 2 ): 469
allowance: beginning balance: 95
purchases ( 1 ): 2014
disposals/payments received: 2014
accretion: 2014
builds ( reductions ) to the allowance: -18
increase to expected cash flows: 2014
fx/other: 2014
balance at december 31 2010 ( 2 ): 77

( 1 ) the balance reported in the column 201ccarrying amount of loan receivable 201d consists of $ 130 million of purchased loans accounted for under the level-yield method and $ 0 under the cost-recovery method . these balances represent the fair value of these loans at their acquisition date . the related total expected cash flows for the level-yield loans were $ 131 million at their acquisition dates . ( 2 ) the balance reported in the column 201ccarrying amount of loan receivable 201d consists of $ 315 million of loans accounted for under the level-yield method and $ 154 million accounted for under the cost-recovery method. .

Questions:
what is the difference between the beginning balance carrying amount of loan receivables and allowance?
what was this difference at the end of 2010?
what is the net difference?
what is the net difference divided by the difference at the beginning of the period?

Answers:
825
392
-433
-52.5%
comparison of cumulative return among lkq corporation , the nasdaq stock market ( u.s. ) index and the peer group .

12/31/2011: lkq corporation: 100
s&p 500 index: 100
peer group: 100
12/31/2012: lkq corporation: 140
s&p 500 index: 113
peer group: 111
12/31/2013: lkq corporation: 219
s&p 500 index: 147
peer group: 140
12/31/2014: lkq corporation: 187
s&p 500 index: 164
peer group: 177
12/31/2015: lkq corporation: 197
s&p 500 index: 163
peer group: 188
12/31/2016: lkq corporation: 204
s&p 500 index: 178
peer group: 217

this stock performance information is "furnished" and shall not be deemed to be "soliciting material" or subject to rule 14a , shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of section 18 of the securities exchange act of 1934 or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section , and shall not be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the securities act of 1933 or the securities exchange act of 1934 , whether made before or after the date of this report and irrespective of any general incorporation by reference language in any such filing , except to the extent that it specifically incorporates the information by reference . information about our common stock that may be issued under our equity compensation plans as of december 31 , 2016 included in part iii , item 12 of this annual report on form 10-k is incorporated herein by reference. .

Questions:
what was the price of lkq corporation in 2016?
what was the price in 2011?
what is the net difference?
what was the 2011 price?
what is the change over the 2011 price?

Answers:
204
100
104
100
104%
notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) a summary of the remaining liability for the 2007 , 2003 and 2001 restructuring programs is as follows : program program program total .

2007 program: liability at december 31 2006: 2014
net charges ( reversals ) and adjustments: 19.1
payments and other1: -15
liability at december 31 2007: 11.9
net charges and adjustments: 4.3
liability at december 31 2008: 1.2
2003 program: liability at december 31 2006: 12.6
net charges ( reversals ) and adjustments: -0.5
payments and other1: -4.1
liability at december 31 2007: 9
net charges and adjustments: 0.8
liability at december 31 2008: 5.7
2001 program: liability at december 31 2006: 19.2
net charges ( reversals ) and adjustments: -5.2
payments and other1: -3.5
liability at december 31 2007: 8.7
net charges and adjustments: 0.7
liability at december 31 2008: 5.9
total: liability at december 31 2006: 31.8
net charges ( reversals ) and adjustments: 13.4
payments and other1: -22.6
liability at december 31 2007: 29.6
net charges and adjustments: 5.8
liability at december 31 2008: 12.8

1 includes amounts representing adjustments to the liability for changes in foreign currency exchange rates . other reorganization-related charges other reorganization-related charges relate to our realignment of our media businesses into a newly created management entity called mediabrands and the 2006 merger of draft worldwide and foote , cone and belding worldwide to create draftfcb . charges related to severance and terminations costs and lease termination and other exit costs . we expect charges associated with mediabrands to be completed during the first half of 2009 . charges related to the creation of draftfcb in 2006 are complete . the charges were separated from the rest of our operating expenses within the consolidated statements of operations because they did not result from charges that occurred in the normal course of business. .

Questions:
what was the total liability by the end of 2008?
and what was it by the end of 2007?
what was, then, the change over the year?
what was the total liability by the end of 2008?
and how much does that change represent in relation to this 2008 total liability?
how much is that in percentage?

Answers:
29.6
12.8
16.8
29.6
0.5675
56.75
page 15 of 100 shareholder return performance the line graph below compares the annual percentage change in ball corporation 2019s cumulative total shareholder return on its common stock with the cumulative total return of the dow jones containers & packaging index and the s&p composite 500 stock index for the five-year period ended december 31 , 2010 . it assumes $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2005 , and that all dividends were reinvested . the dow jones containers & packaging index total return has been weighted by market capitalization . total return analysis .

12/31/05: ball corporation: 100
dj containers & packaging index: 100
s&p 500 index: 100
copyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm ): -9
copyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .: 9
12/31/06: ball corporation: 110.86
dj containers & packaging index: 112.09
s&p 500 index: 115.8
copyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm ): -9
copyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .: 9
12/31/07: ball corporation: 115.36
dj containers & packaging index: 119.63
s&p 500 index: 122.16
copyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm ): -9
copyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .: 9
12/31/08: ball corporation: 107.58
dj containers & packaging index: 75
s&p 500 index: 76.96
copyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm ): -9
copyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .: 9
12/31/09: ball corporation: 134.96
dj containers & packaging index: 105.34
s&p 500 index: 97.33
copyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm ): -9
copyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .: 9
12/31/10: ball corporation: 178.93
dj containers & packaging index: 123.56
s&p 500 index: 111.99
copyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm ): -9
copyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .: 9

.

Questions:
what was the change in price for ball corporation between 12/31/10 and 12/31/05?
so what was the percentage cumulative return during this time?
did the five year total return for ball corporation outperform the dj containers & packaging index?

Answers:
78.93
78.93%
yes
performance graph comparison of five-year cumulative total return the following graph and table compare the cumulative total return on citi 2019s common stock , which is listed on the nyse under the ticker symbol 201cc 201d and held by 65691 common stockholders of record as of january 31 , 2018 , with the cumulative total return of the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index over the five-year period through december 31 , 2017 . the graph and table assume that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2012 in citi 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index , and that all dividends were reinvested . comparison of five-year cumulative total return for the years ended date citi s&p 500 financials .

citi: 31-dec-2012: 100
31-dec-2013: 131.8
31-dec-2014: 137
31-dec-2015: 131.4
31-dec-2016: 152.3
31-dec-2017: 193.5
s&p 500: 31-dec-2012: 100
31-dec-2013: 132.4
31-dec-2014: 150.5
31-dec-2015: 152.6
31-dec-2016: 170.8
31-dec-2017: 208.1
s&p financials: 31-dec-2012: 100
31-dec-2013: 135.6
31-dec-2014: 156.2
31-dec-2015: 153.9
31-dec-2016: 188.9
31-dec-2017: 230.9

.

Questions:
what is the value of s&p financials in 2016?
what is the value in 2015?
what is the net change?
what was the 2015 number?
what is the net change over the 2015 value?

Answers:
188.9
153.9
35
153.9
22.7%
item 5 . market for the registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities the following graph compares annual total return of our common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 composite stock index ( 201cs&p 500 index 201d ) and our peer group ( 201cloews peer group 201d ) for the five years ended december 31 , 2015 . the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock , the s&p 500 index and the loews peer group was $ 100 on december 31 , 2010 and that all dividends were reinvested. .

2010: loews common stock: 100
s&p 500 index: 100
loews peer group ( a ): 100
2011: loews common stock: 97.37
s&p 500 index: 102.11
loews peer group ( a ): 101.59
2012: loews common stock: 106.04
s&p 500 index: 118.45
loews peer group ( a ): 115.19
2013: loews common stock: 126.23
s&p 500 index: 156.82
loews peer group ( a ): 145.12
2014: loews common stock: 110.59
s&p 500 index: 178.29
loews peer group ( a ): 152.84
2015: loews common stock: 101.72
s&p 500 index: 180.75
loews peer group ( a ): 144.7

( a ) the loews peer group consists of the following companies that are industry competitors of our principal operating subsidiaries : ace limited , w.r . berkley corporation , the chubb corporation , energy transfer partners l.p. , ensco plc , the hartford financial services group , inc. , kinder morgan energy partners , l.p . ( included through november 26 , 2014 when it was acquired by kinder morgan inc. ) , noble corporation , spectra energy corp , transocean ltd . and the travelers companies , inc . dividend information we have paid quarterly cash dividends on loews common stock in each year since 1967 . regular dividends of $ 0.0625 per share of loews common stock were paid in each calendar quarter of 2015 and 2014. .

Questions:
what is the value of loews common stock in 2011 less 100?
what is that divided by 100?

Answers:
-2.63
-2.6%
part ii item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities the following table presents reported quarterly high and low per share sale prices of our common stock on the new york stock exchange ( 201cnyse 201d ) for the years 2010 and 2009. .

high: quarter ended march 31: 32.53
quarter ended june 30: 34.52
quarter ended september 30: 37.71
quarter ended december 31: 43.84
2009: high
low: quarter ended march 31: 25.45
quarter ended june 30: 27.93
quarter ended september 30: 29.89
quarter ended december 31: 35.03
2009: low

on february 11 , 2011 , the closing price of our common stock was $ 56.73 per share as reported on the nyse . as of february 11 , 2011 , we had 397612895 outstanding shares of common stock and 463 registered holders . dividends we have not historically paid a dividend on our common stock . payment of dividends in the future , when , as and if authorized by our board of directors , would depend upon many factors , including our earnings and financial condition , restrictions under applicable law and our current and future loan agreements , our debt service requirements , our capital expenditure requirements and other factors that our board of directors may deem relevant from time to time , including the potential determination to elect reit status . in addition , the loan agreement for our revolving credit facility and term loan contain covenants that generally restrict our ability to pay dividends unless certain financial covenants are satisfied . for more information about the restrictions under the loan agreement for the revolving credit facility and term loan , our notes indentures and the loan agreement related to our securitization , see item 7 of this annual report under the caption 201cmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2014liquidity and capital resources 2014factors affecting sources of liquidity 201d and note 6 to our consolidated financial statements included in this annual report. .

Questions:
what was the closing price of the common stock in february of 2011?
and what was its highest value during the last quarter of the year before, in 2010?
by how much, then, did it change over this period?
and how much did this change represent in relation to that highest value, in percentage?
and by the end of that period, at the date of the closing price, what was the number of outstanding shares of common stock?
considering the closing price, what was, then, their total value?

Answers:
56.73
53.14
3.59
6.8%
397612895
22556579533.3
federal realty investment trust schedule iii summary of real estate and accumulated depreciation 2014continued three years ended december 31 , 2005 reconciliation of accumulated depreciation and amortization .

$ 450697000: additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense: 83656000
deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property: -15244000
balance december 31 2003: 514177000
balance december 31 2004: 595338000
balance december 31 2005: 663750000

.

Questions:
what is the value of accumulated depreciation and amortization at the end of 2005?
what is the balance at the end of 2004?
what is the ratio of 2005 to 2004?
what is that less 1?

Answers:
663750000
595338000
1.1149
11.49%
we have adequate access to capital markets to meet any foreseeable cash requirements , and we have sufficient financial capacity to satisfy our current liabilities . cash flows millions 2014 2013 2012 .

2014: cash provided by operating activities: 7385
cash used in investing activities: -4249
cash used in financing activities: -2982
net change in cash and cashequivalents: 154
2013: cash provided by operating activities: 6823
cash used in investing activities: -3405
cash used in financing activities: -3049
net change in cash and cashequivalents: 369
2012: cash provided by operating activities: 6161
cash used in investing activities: -3633
cash used in financing activities: -2682
net change in cash and cashequivalents: -154

operating activities higher net income in 2014 increased cash provided by operating activities compared to 2013 , despite higher income tax payments . 2014 income tax payments were higher than 2013 primarily due to higher income , but also because we paid taxes previously deferred by bonus depreciation ( discussed below ) . higher net income in 2013 increased cash provided by operating activities compared to 2012 . in addition , we made payments in 2012 for past wages as a result of national labor negotiations , which reduced cash provided by operating activities in 2012 . lower tax benefits from bonus depreciation ( as discussed below ) partially offset the increases . federal tax law provided for 100% ( 100 % ) bonus depreciation for qualified investments made during 2011 and 50% ( 50 % ) bonus depreciation for qualified investments made during 2012-2013 . as a result , the company deferred a substantial portion of its 2011-2013 income tax expense , contributing to the positive operating cash flow in those years . congress extended 50% ( 50 % ) bonus depreciation for 2014 , but this extension occurred in december and did not have a significant benefit on our income tax payments during 2014 . investing activities higher capital investments , including the early buyout of the long-term operating lease of our headquarters building for approximately $ 261 million , drove the increase in cash used in investing activities compared to 2013 . significant investments also were made for new locomotives , freight cars and containers , and capacity and commercial facility projects . capital investments in 2014 also included $ 99 million for the early buyout of locomotives and freight cars under long-term operating leases , which we exercised due to favorable economic terms and market conditions . lower capital investments in locomotives and freight cars in 2013 drove the decrease in cash used in investing activities compared to 2012 . included in capital investments in 2012 was $ 75 million for the early buyout of 165 locomotives under long-term operating and capital leases during the first quarter of 2012 , which we exercised due to favorable economic terms and market conditions. .

Questions:
what was the cash by operating activities for 2014?
and in 2013?
so what was the difference between these years?
and the percentage change over this time?

Answers:
7385
6823
562
8%
entergy new orleans , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis net revenue 2008 compared to 2007 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2008 to 2007 . amount ( in millions ) .

amount ( in millions ): 2007 net revenue: 231
volume/weather: 15.5
net gas revenue: 6.6
rider revenue: 3.9
base revenue: -11.3
other: 7
2008 net revenue: 252.7

the volume/weather variance is due to an increase in electricity usage in the service territory in 2008 compared to the same period in 2007 . entergy new orleans estimates that approximately 141000 electric customers and 93000 gas customers have returned since hurricane katrina and are taking service as of december 31 , 2008 , compared to approximately 132000 electric customers and 86000 gas customers as of december 31 , 2007 . billed retail electricity usage increased a total of 184 gwh compared to the same period in 2007 , an increase of 4% ( 4 % ) . the net gas revenue variance is primarily due to an increase in base rates in march and november 2007 . refer to note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the base rate increase . the rider revenue variance is due primarily to higher total revenue and a storm reserve rider effective march 2007 as a result of the city council's approval of a settlement agreement in october 2006 . the approved storm reserve has been set to collect $ 75 million over a ten-year period through the rider and the funds will be held in a restricted escrow account . the settlement agreement is discussed in note 2 to the financial statements . the base revenue variance is primarily due to a base rate recovery credit , effective january 2008 . the base rate credit is discussed in note 2 to the financial statements . gross operating revenues and fuel and purchased power expenses gross operating revenues increased primarily due to : an increase of $ 58.9 million in gross wholesale revenue due to increased sales to affiliated customers and an increase in the average price of energy available for resale sales ; an increase of $ 47.7 million in electric fuel cost recovery revenues due to higher fuel rates and increased electricity usage ; and an increase of $ 22 million in gross gas revenues due to higher fuel recovery revenues and increases in gas base rates in march 2007 and november 2007 . fuel and purchased power increased primarily due to increases in the average market prices of natural gas and purchased power in addition to an increase in demand. .

Questions:
what was the increase observed in the net revenue from 2007 to 2008?
what was that net revenue in 2007?
how much, then, did that increase represent in relation to this 2007 amount?
and what percentage of that increase between the years was due to rider revenue?

Answers:
21.7
231.0
9.4%
18%
15 . debt the tables below summarize our outstanding debt at 30 september 2016 and 2015 : total debt .

2016: current portion of long-term debt: 371.3
long-term debt: 4918.1
total debt: 6225.2
30 september: 2016
bank obligations: 133.1
commercial paper: 802.7
total short-term borrowings: 935.8
2015: current portion of long-term debt: 435.6
long-term debt: 3949.1
total debt: 5879
30 september: 2015
bank obligations: 234.3
commercial paper: 1260
total short-term borrowings: 1494.3

the weighted average interest rate of short-term borrowings outstanding at 30 september 2016 and 2015 was 1.1% ( 1.1 % ) and .8% ( .8 % ) , respectively . cash paid for interest , net of amounts capitalized , was $ 121.1 in 2016 , $ 97.5 in 2015 , and $ 132.4 in 2014. .

Questions:
what was the total of short-term borrowings in 2016?
and what was the current portion of long-term debt in that year?
what was, then, the combined total of both short-term borrowings and current portion of long-term debt in 2016?
what was the total debt in that year?
how much, then, does that combined total represent in relation to this total debt, in percentage?

Answers:
935.8
371.3
1307.1
6225.2
21%