sharick008/convfinqa huggingface dataset:
the following table illustrates the pro forma effect on net income and earnings per share as if all outstanding and unvested stock options in 2005 were accounted for using estimated fair value . 2005year ended december 31 .

2005: net income as reported: 838
add : stock option compensation expense included in reported net income net of related taxes: 20
deduct : total stock option compensation expense determined under fair value method for all awards net of related taxes: -27
pro forma net income: 831
basic 2014as reported: 2.53
basic 2014pro forma: 2.51
diluted 2014as reported: 2.5
diluted 2014pro forma: 2.48

basic earnings per share is calculated by dividing net income available to common shareholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the period , which excludes unvested shares of restricted stock . diluted earnings per share is calculated by dividing net income available to common shareholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the period and the shares representing the dilutive effect of stock options and awards and other equity-related financial instruments . the effect of stock options and restricted stock outstanding is excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per share in periods in which their effect would be antidilutive . special purpose entities : we are involved with various legal forms of special purpose entities , or spes , in the normal course of our business . we use trusts to structure and sell certificated interests in pools of tax-exempt investment-grade assets principally to our mutual fund customers . these trusts are recorded in our consolidated financial statements . we transfer assets to these trusts , which are legally isolated from us , from our investment securities portfolio at adjusted book value . the trusts finance the acquisition of these assets by selling certificated interests issued by the trusts to third-party investors . the investment securities of the trusts are carried in investments securities available for sale at fair value . the certificated interests are carried in other short-term borrowings at the amount owed to the third-party investors . the interest revenue and interest expense generated by the investments and certificated interests , respectively , are recorded in net interest revenue when earned or incurred. .

Questions:
what was the total value of outstanding shares based on the eps in 2005, in millions?
and what was the value per share?
what, then, can be concluded to have been the number of shares?
and what would be that number for diluted shares, considering their individual price?

Answers:
838
2.53
331.2
335.2
entergy texas , inc . and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis results of operations net income 2017 compared to 2016 net income decreased $ 31.4 million primarily due to lower net revenue , higher depreciation and amortization expenses , higher other operation and maintenance expenses , and higher taxes other than income taxes . 2016 compared to 2015 net income increased $ 37.9 million primarily due to lower other operation and maintenance expenses , the asset write-off of its receivable associated with the spindletop gas storage facility in 2015 , and higher net revenue . net revenue 2017 compared to 2016 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2017 to 2016 . amount ( in millions ) .

amount ( in millions ): 2016 net revenue: 644.2
net wholesale revenue: -35.1
purchased power capacity: -5.9
transmission revenue: -5.4
reserve equalization: 5.6
retail electric price: 19
other: 4.4
2017 net revenue: 626.8

the net wholesale revenue variance is primarily due to lower net capacity revenues resulting from the termination of the purchased power agreements between entergy louisiana and entergy texas in august 2016 . the purchased power capacity variance is primarily due to increased expenses due to capacity cost changes for ongoing purchased power capacity contracts . the transmission revenue variance is primarily due to a decrease in the amount of transmission revenues allocated by miso . the reserve equalization variance is due to the absence of reserve equalization expenses in 2017 as a result of entergy texas 2019s exit from the system agreement in august 2016 . see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the system agreement. .

Questions:
what was the net revenue in 2017 without the net wholesale revenue?
and what percentage does the amount of this net wholesale revenue represent in relation to this value?
and in the previous year, how much did the net revenue represent in relation to the increase in the net income?

Answers:
661.9
.053
17
kinder morgan , inc . form 10-k indicate by check mark whether the registrant ( 1 ) has filed all reports required to be filed by section 13 or 15 ( d ) of the securities exchange act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months ( or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports ) , and ( 2 ) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days . yes f06f no f0fe indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate website , if any , every interactive data file required to be submitted and posted pursuant to rule 405 of regulation s-t during the preceding 12 months ( or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files ) . yes f06f no f06f indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to item 405 of regulation s-k is not contained herein , and will not be contained , to the best of registrant 2019s knowledge , in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in part iii of this form 10-k or any amendment to this form 10-k . f0fe indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer , an accelerated filer , a non-accelerated filer , or a smaller reporting company ( as defined in rule 12b-2 of the securities exchange act of 1934 ) . large accelerated filer f06f accelerated filer f06f non-accelerated filer f0fe smaller reporting company f06f indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company ( as defined in rule 12b-2 of the securities exchange act of 1934 ) . yes f06f no f0fe as of june 30 , 2010 , the registrant was a privately held company , and therefore the market value of its common equity held by nonaffiliates was zero . as of february 16 , 2011 , the registrant had the following number of shares of common stock outstanding: .

597213410: class b common stock: 100000000
class c common stock: 2462927
class p common stock: 109786590

explanatory note prior to the consummation of its february 2011 initial public offering , kinder morgan , inc. , was a delaware limited liability company named kinder morgan holdco llc whose unitholders became stockholders of kinder morgan , inc . upon the completion of its initial public offering . except as disclosed in the accompanying report , the consolidated financial statements and selected historical consolidated financial data and other historical financial information included in this report are those of kinder morgan holdco llc or its predecessor and their respective subsidiaries and do not give effect to the conversion . kinder morgan holdco llc 2019s wholly owned subsidiary , kinder morgan , inc. , who was not the registrant under our initial public offering , has changed its name to kinder morgan kansas , inc. .

Questions:
what is the number of class a common stock?
what is the number of class b stock?
what is the sum of class a and b stock?
what is the number including class c common stock?
what is the sum including a, b and c and p common stock?

Answers:
597213410
100000000
697213410
699676337
809462927
other long term debt in december 2012 , the company entered into a $ 50.0 million recourse loan collateralized by the land , buildings and tenant improvements comprising the company 2019s corporate headquarters . the loan has a seven year term and maturity date of december 2019 . the loan bears interest at one month libor plus a margin of 1.50% ( 1.50 % ) , and allows for prepayment without penalty . the loan includes covenants and events of default substantially consistent with the company 2019s credit agreement discussed above . the loan also requires prior approval of the lender for certain matters related to the property , including transfers of any interest in the property . as of december 31 , 2017 and 2016 , the outstanding balance on the loan was $ 40.0 million and $ 42.0 million , respectively . the weighted average interest rate on the loan was 2.5% ( 2.5 % ) and 2.0% ( 2.0 % ) for the years ended december 31 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively . the following are the scheduled maturities of long term debt as of december 31 , 2017 : ( in thousands ) .

$ 27000: 2019: 63000
2020: 25000
2021: 86250
2022: 2014
2023 and thereafter: 600000
total scheduled maturities of long term debt: 801250
current maturities of long term debt: 27000

interest expense , net was $ 34.5 million , $ 26.4 million , and $ 14.6 million for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . interest expense includes the amortization of deferred financing costs , bank fees , capital and built-to-suit lease interest and interest expense under the credit and other long term debt facilities . amortization of deferred financing costs was $ 1.3 million , $ 1.2 million , and $ 0.8 million for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . the company monitors the financial health and stability of its lenders under the credit and other long term debt facilities , however during any period of significant instability in the credit markets lenders could be negatively impacted in their ability to perform under these facilities . 7 . commitments and contingencies obligations under operating leases the company leases warehouse space , office facilities , space for its brand and factory house stores and certain equipment under non-cancelable operating leases . the leases expire at various dates through 2033 , excluding extensions at the company 2019s option , and include provisions for rental adjustments . the table below includes executed lease agreements for brand and factory house stores that the company did not yet occupy as of december 31 , 2017 and does not include contingent rent the company may incur at its stores based on future sales above a specified minimum or payments made for maintenance , insurance and real estate taxes . the following is a schedule of future minimum lease payments for non-cancelable real property operating leases as of december 31 , 2017 as well as .

Questions:
what was the interest expense in 2017?
and what was it in 2016?
what was, then, the change over the year?
and how much does this change represent in relation to the 2016 interest expense, in percentage?

Answers:
34.5
26.4
8.1
30.7%
stock total return performance the following graph compares our total return to stockholders with the returns of the standard & poor 2019s composite 500 index ( 201cs&p 500 201d ) and the dow jones us select health care providers index ( 201cpeer group 201d ) for the five years ended december 31 , 2018 . the graph assumes an investment of $ 100 in each of our common stock , the s&p 500 , and the peer group on december 31 , 2013 , and that dividends were reinvested when paid. .

12/31/2013: hum: 100
s&p 500: 100
peer group: 100
12/31/2014: hum: 140
s&p 500: 114
peer group: 128
12/31/2015: hum: 176
s&p 500: 115
peer group: 135
12/31/2016: hum: 202
s&p 500: 129
peer group: 137
12/31/2017: hum: 247
s&p 500: 157
peer group: 173
12/31/2018: hum: 287
s&p 500: 150
peer group: 191

the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance. .

Questions:
what was the value of hum in 2017?
what was the value in 2016?
what was the net change in value?
what was the 2016 value?
what is the net change divided by the 2016 value?

Answers:
247
202
45
202
22.3%
.

2018: statutory tax rate: -19
u.s . state income taxes net of u.s . federal benefit: -0.4
taxes on international operations ( 1 ): -7.3
nondeductible expenses: 2.7
adjustments to prior year tax requirements: 0.9
adjustments to valuation allowances: 3.8
change in uncertain tax positions: 0.9
excess tax benefits related to shared based compensation ( 2 ): -3.6
u.s . tax reform impact ( 3 ): 7.1
loss on disposition: -10.2
other 2014 net: -1.2
effective tax rate: -11.7
2017: statutory tax rate: -19.3
u.s . state income taxes net of u.s . federal benefit: -1.5
taxes on international operations ( 1 ): -30.3
nondeductible expenses: 3.4
adjustments to prior year tax requirements: 2
adjustments to valuation allowances: -1.8
change in uncertain tax positions: 1.6
excess tax benefits related to shared based compensation ( 2 ): -8
u.s . tax reform impact ( 3 ): 51.2
loss on disposition: 2014
other 2014 net: 0.6
effective tax rate: -36.5
2016: statutory tax rate: -20
u.s . state income taxes net of u.s . federal benefit: 0.4
taxes on international operations ( 1 ): -12.2
nondeductible expenses: 1.4
adjustments to prior year tax requirements: -1.2
adjustments to valuation allowances: -2.2
change in uncertain tax positions: 3.2
excess tax benefits related to shared based compensation ( 2 ): 2014
u.s . tax reform impact ( 3 ): 2014
loss on disposition: 2014
other 2014 net: 1.2
effective tax rate: -10.6

( 1 ) the company determines the adjustment for taxes on international operations based on the difference between the statutory tax rate applicable to earnings in each foreign jurisdiction and the enacted rate of 19.0% ( 19.0 % ) , 19.3% ( 19.3 % ) and 20.0% ( 20.0 % ) at december 31 , 2018 , 2017 , and 2016 , respectively . the benefit to the company 2019s effective income tax rate from taxes on international operations relates to benefits from lower-taxed global operations , primarily due to the use of global funding structures and the tax holiday in singapore . the impact decreased from 2017 to 2018 primarily as a result of the decrease in the u.s . federal tax ( 2 ) with the adoption of asu 2016-09 in 2017 , excess tax benefits and deficiencies from share-based payment transactions are recognized as income tax expense or benefit in the company 2019s consolidated statements of income . ( 3 ) the impact of the tax reform act including the transition tax , the re-measurement of u.s . deferred tax assets and liabilities from 35% ( 35 % ) to 21% ( 21 % ) , withholding tax accruals , and the allocation of tax benefit between continuing operations and discontinued operations related to utilization of foreign tax credits. .

Questions:
what was the difference in the effective tax rate and the statutory rate for international operations in 2018?
and the difference in the statutory tax rate and the effective tax rate for international operations in 2018?

Answers:
-7.3
17.2%
2mar201707015999 ( c ) in october 2016 , our accelerated share repurchase ( 2018 2018asr 2019 2019 ) agreement concluded and we received an additional 44 thousand shares of our common stock . shares purchased pursuant to the asr agreement are presented in the table above in the periods in which they were received . performance graph the following graph compares the performance of our common stock with that of the s&p 500 index and the s&p 500 healthcare equipment index . the cumulative total return listed below assumes an initial investment of $ 100 at the market close on december 30 , 2011 and reinvestment of dividends . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return 2011 2012 2016201520142013 edwards lifesciences corporation s&p 500 s&p 500 healthcare equipment index december 31 .

2012: edwards lifesciences: 127.54
s&p 500: 116
s&p 500 healthcare equipment index: 117.42
2013: edwards lifesciences: 93.01
s&p 500: 153.58
s&p 500 healthcare equipment index: 150.28
2014: edwards lifesciences: 180.17
s&p 500: 174.6
s&p 500 healthcare equipment index: 181.96
2015: edwards lifesciences: 223.42
s&p 500: 177.01
s&p 500 healthcare equipment index: 194.37
2016: edwards lifesciences: 265.06
s&p 500: 198.18
s&p 500 healthcare equipment index: 207.46

.

Questions:
what was the value of edwards lifesciences in 2016 less an initial investment of $100?
what is the percent change?

Answers:
165.06
165.06%
asset category target allocation total quoted prices in active markets for identical assets ( level 1 ) significant observable inputs ( level 2 ) significant unobservable inputs .

level 3: balance as of january 1 2018: 278
actual return on assets: -23
purchases issuances and settlements net: -25
balance as of december 31 2018: 230

balance as of january 1 , 2017 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 140 actual return on assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 purchases , issuances and settlements , net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 136 balance as of december 31 , 2017 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 278 the company 2019s postretirement benefit plans have different levels of funded status and the assets are held under various trusts . the investments and risk mitigation strategies for the plans are tailored specifically for each trust . in setting new strategic asset mixes , consideration is given to the likelihood that the selected asset allocation will effectively fund the projected plan liabilities and meet the risk tolerance criteria of the company . the company periodically updates the long-term , strategic asset allocations for these plans through asset liability studies and uses various analytics to determine the optimal asset allocation . considerations include plan liability characteristics , liquidity needs , funding requirements , expected rates of return and the distribution of returns . in 2012 , the company implemented a de-risking strategy for the american water pension plan after conducting an asset-liability study to reduce the volatility of the funded status of the plan . as part of the de-risking strategy , the company revised the asset allocations to increase the matching characteristics of fixed- income assets relative to liabilities . the fixed income portion of the portfolio was designed to match the bond- .

Questions:
what was the level 3 balance at the end of 2018?
what was the level 3 balance at the start of 2018?
what was the net change in 2018?
what was the level 3 balance at the start of 2018?
what is the percent change?

Answers:
230
278
-48
278
-17.3%
american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements loss on retirement of long-term obligations 2014loss on retirement of long-term obligations primarily includes cash paid to retire debt in excess of its carrying value , cash paid to holders of convertible notes in connection with note conversions and non-cash charges related to the write-off of deferred financing fees . loss on retirement of long-term obligations also includes gains from repurchasing or refinancing certain of the company 2019s debt obligations . earnings per common share 2014basic and diluted 2014basic income from continuing operations per common share for the years ended december 31 , 2012 , 2011 and 2010 represents income from continuing operations attributable to american tower corporation divided by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period . diluted income from continuing operations per common share for the years ended december 31 , 2012 , 2011 and 2010 represents income from continuing operations attributable to american tower corporation divided by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period and any dilutive common share equivalents , including unvested restricted stock , shares issuable upon exercise of stock options and warrants as determined under the treasury stock method and upon conversion of the company 2019s convertible notes , as determined under the if-converted method . retirement plan 2014the company has a 401 ( k ) plan covering substantially all employees who meet certain age and employment requirements . the company 2019s matching contribution for the years ended december 31 , 2012 , 2011 and 2010 is 50% ( 50 % ) up to a maximum 6% ( 6 % ) of a participant 2019s contributions . for the years ended december 31 , 2012 , 2011 and 2010 , the company contributed approximately $ 4.4 million , $ 2.9 million and $ 1.9 million to the plan , respectively . 2 . prepaid and other current assets prepaid and other current assets consist of the following as of december 31 , ( in thousands ) : .

2012: prepaid income tax: 57665
prepaid operating ground leases: 56916
value added tax and other consumption tax receivables: 22443
prepaid assets: 19037
other miscellaneous current assets: 66790
balance as of december 31,: 222851
2011 ( 1 ): prepaid income tax: 31384
prepaid operating ground leases: 49585
value added tax and other consumption tax receivables: 81276
prepaid assets: 28031
other miscellaneous current assets: 59997
balance as of december 31,: 250273

( 1 ) december 31 , 2011 balances have been revised to reflect purchase accounting measurement period adjustments. .

Questions:
what was the sum of prepaid income and value added tax and other consumption tax receivables in 2011?
what then is the percent of tax related assets over the total balance at the end of 2011?

Answers:
112660
45%
comparison of five-year cumulative total return the following graph compares the cumulative total return on citigroup 2019s common stock with the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index over the five-year period extending through december 31 , 2009 . the graph assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2004 in citigroup 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index and that all dividends were reinvested . citigroup s&p 500 index s&p financial index 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 comparison of five-year cumulative total return for the years ended .

citigroup: 2005: 104.38
2006: 124.02
2007: 70.36
2008: 18.71
2009: 9.26
s&p 500 index: 2005: 104.83
2006: 121.2
2007: 127.85
2008: 81.12
2009: 102.15
s&p financial index: 2005: 106.3
2006: 126.41
2007: 103.47
2008: 47.36
2009: 55.27

.

Questions:
what was the net change in citigroup from 2007 to 2008?
what is the percent change?

Answers:
-51.65
73.4%