sharick008/convfinqa huggingface dataset:
performance graph the following graph compares the yearly change in the cumulative total stockholder return for our last five full fiscal years , based upon the market price of our common stock , with the cumulative total return on a nasdaq composite index ( u.s . companies ) and a peer group , the nasdaq medical equipment-sic code 3840-3849 index , which is comprised of medical equipment companies , for that period . the performance graph assumes the investment of $ 100 on march 31 , 2010 in our common stock , the nasdaq composite index ( u.s . companies ) and the peer group index , and the reinvestment of any and all dividends. .

3/31/2010: abiomed inc: 100
nasdaq composite index: 100
nasdaq medical equipment sic code 3840-3849: 100
3/31/2011: abiomed inc: 140.79
nasdaq composite index: 115.98
nasdaq medical equipment sic code 3840-3849: 108.31
3/31/2012: abiomed inc: 215.02
nasdaq composite index: 128.93
nasdaq medical equipment sic code 3840-3849: 115.05
3/31/2013: abiomed inc: 180.91
nasdaq composite index: 136.26
nasdaq medical equipment sic code 3840-3849: 105.56
3/31/2014: abiomed inc: 252.33
nasdaq composite index: 175.11
nasdaq medical equipment sic code 3840-3849: 123.18
3/31/2015: abiomed inc: 693.6
nasdaq composite index: 204.38
nasdaq medical equipment sic code 3840-3849: 118.95

this graph is not 201csoliciting material 201d under regulation 14a or 14c of the rules promulgated under the securities exchange act of 1934 , is not deemed filed with the securities and exchange commission and is not to be incorporated by reference in any of our filings under the securities act of 1933 , as amended , or the exchange act whether made before or after the date hereof and irrespective of any general incorporation language in any such filing . transfer agent american stock transfer & trust company , 59 maiden lane , new york , ny 10038 , is our stock transfer agent. .

Questions:
what is the net change in price of the nasdaq composite index from 2010 to 2013?
what is that over the 2010 price?

Answers:
36.26
36.3%
measurement point december 31 the priceline group nasdaq composite index s&p 500 rdg internet composite .

the priceline group inc .: 2010: 100
2011: 117.06
2012: 155.27
2013: 290.93
2014: 285.37
2015: 319.1
nasdaqcomposite index: 2010: 100
2011: 100.53
2012: 116.92
2013: 166.19
2014: 188.78
2015: 199.95
s&p 500index: 2010: 100
2011: 102.11
2012: 118.45
2013: 156.82
2014: 178.29
2015: 180.75
rdg internetcomposite: 2010: 100
2011: 102.11
2012: 122.23
2013: 199.42
2014: 195.42
2015: 267.25

.

Questions:
what is the 2015 value of priceline less 100?
what is the percent change?
what is the value of the s&p 500 index in 2015?
what is that less 100?
what is the difference divided by 100?
what is the difference in percent changes?

Answers:
219.1
219.1%
180.75
80.75
80.75%
138.35%
entergy arkansas , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis results of operations net income 2008 compared to 2007 net income decreased $ 92.0 million primarily due to higher other operation and maintenance expenses , higher depreciation and amortization expenses , and a higher effective income tax rate , partially offset by higher net revenue . the higher other operation and maintenance expenses resulted primarily from the write-off of approximately $ 70.8 million of costs as a result of the december 2008 arkansas court of appeals decision in entergy arkansas' base rate case . the base rate case is discussed in more detail in note 2 to the financial statements . 2007 compared to 2006 net income decreased $ 34.0 million primarily due to higher other operation and maintenance expenses , higher depreciation and amortization expenses , and a higher effective income tax rate . the decrease was partially offset by higher net revenue . net revenue 2008 compared to 2007 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory credits . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2008 to 2007 . amount ( in millions ) .

amount ( in millions ): 2007 net revenue: 1110.6
rider revenue: 13.6
purchased power capacity: 4.8
volume/weather: -14.6
other: 3.5
2008 net revenue: 1117.9

the rider revenue variance is primarily due to an energy efficiency rider which became effective in november 2007 . the establishment of the rider results in an increase in rider revenue and a corresponding increase in other operation and maintenance expense with no effect on net income . also contributing to the variance was an increase in franchise tax rider revenue as a result of higher retail revenues . the corresponding increase is in taxes other than income taxes , resulting in no effect on net income . the purchased power capacity variance is primarily due to lower reserve equalization expenses . the volume/weather variance is primarily due to the effect of less favorable weather on residential and commercial sales during the billed and unbilled sales periods compared to 2007 and a 2.9% ( 2.9 % ) volume decrease in industrial sales , primarily in the wood industry and the small customer class . billed electricity usage decreased 333 gwh in all sectors . see "critical accounting estimates" below and note 1 to the financial statements for further discussion of the accounting for unbilled revenues. .

Questions:
what was the net revenue in 2008 for entergy arkansas, in millions?
and what was it in 2007, also in millions?
what was, then, in millions, the change in net revenue over the year?
and how much does that change represent in relation to the net revenue in 2007 for entergy arkansas, as counted in millions?

Answers:
1117.9
1110.6
7.3
0.7%
performance graph the graph below compares the cumulative total shareholder return on pmi's common stock with the cumulative total return for the same period of pmi's peer group and the s&p 500 index . the graph assumes the investment of $ 100 as of december 31 , 2012 , in pmi common stock ( at prices quoted on the new york stock exchange ) and each of the indices as of the market close and reinvestment of dividends on a quarterly basis . date pmi pmi peer group ( 1 ) s&p 500 index .

pmi: december 31 2012: 100
december 31 2013: 108.5
december 31 2014: 106.2
december 31 2015: 120.4
december 31 2016: 130.8
december 31 2017: 156.8
pmi peer group ( 1 ): december 31 2012: 100
december 31 2013: 122.8
december 31 2014: 132.5
december 31 2015: 143.5
december 31 2016: 145.6
december 31 2017: 172.7
s&p 500 index: december 31 2012: 100
december 31 2013: 132.4
december 31 2014: 150.5
december 31 2015: 152.6
december 31 2016: 170.8
december 31 2017: 208.1

( 1 ) the pmi peer group presented in this graph is the same as that used in the prior year , except reynolds american inc . was removed following the completion of its acquisition by british american tobacco p.l.c . on july 25 , 2017 . the pmi peer group was established based on a review of four characteristics : global presence ; a focus on consumer products ; and net revenues and a market capitalization of a similar size to those of pmi . the review also considered the primary international tobacco companies . as a result of this review , the following companies constitute the pmi peer group : altria group , inc. , anheuser-busch inbev sa/nv , british american tobacco p.l.c. , the coca-cola company , colgate-palmolive co. , diageo plc , heineken n.v. , imperial brands plc , japan tobacco inc. , johnson & johnson , kimberly-clark corporation , the kraft-heinz company , mcdonald's corp. , mondel z international , inc. , nestl e9 s.a. , pepsico , inc. , the procter & gamble company , roche holding ag , and unilever nv and plc . note : figures are rounded to the nearest $ 0.10. .

Questions:
what was the pmi share price on 12/31/13?
so what was the difference in price between this period and 12/31/12?
so what was the growth rate during this time?

Answers:
108.50
8.5
8.5%
humana inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) the total intrinsic value of stock options exercised during 2007 was $ 133.9 million , compared with $ 133.7 million during 2006 and $ 57.8 million during 2005 . cash received from stock option exercises for the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 , and 2005 totaled $ 62.7 million , $ 49.2 million , and $ 36.4 million , respectively . total compensation expense related to nonvested options not yet recognized was $ 23.6 million at december 31 , 2007 . we expect to recognize this compensation expense over a weighted average period of approximately 1.6 years . restricted stock awards restricted stock awards are granted with a fair value equal to the market price of our common stock on the date of grant . compensation expense is recorded straight-line over the vesting period , generally three years from the date of grant . the weighted average grant date fair value of our restricted stock awards was $ 63.59 , $ 54.36 , and $ 32.81 for the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 , and 2005 , respectively . activity for our restricted stock awards was as follows for the year ended december 31 , 2007 : shares weighted average grant-date fair value .

shares: nonvested restricted stock at december 31 2006: 1107455
granted: 852353
vested: -51206
forfeited: -63624
nonvested restricted stock at december 31 2007: 1844978
weighted average grant-date fair value: nonvested restricted stock at december 31 2006: 45.86
granted: 63.59
vested: 56.93
forfeited: 49.65
nonvested restricted stock at december 31 2007: 53.61

the fair value of shares vested during the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 , and 2005 was $ 3.4 million , $ 2.3 million , and $ 0.6 million , respectively . total compensation expense related to nonvested restricted stock awards not yet recognized was $ 44.7 million at december 31 , 2007 . we expect to recognize this compensation expense over a weighted average period of approximately 1.4 years . there are no other contractual terms covering restricted stock awards once vested. .

Questions:
what was the net change in the weighted average grant-date fair value from 2006 to 2007?
what is that change divided by the 2006 price?

Answers:
9.23
16.97%
entergy new orleans , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis 2007 compared to 2006 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2007 to 2006 . amount ( in millions ) .

amount ( in millions ): 2006 net revenue: 192.2
fuel recovery: 42.6
volume/weather: 25.6
rider revenue: 8.5
net wholesale revenue: -41.2
other: 3.3
2007 net revenue: 231

the fuel recovery variance is due to the inclusion of grand gulf costs in fuel recoveries effective july 1 , 2006 . in june 2006 , the city council approved the recovery of grand gulf costs through the fuel adjustment clause , without a corresponding change in base rates ( a significant portion of grand gulf costs was previously recovered through base rates ) . the volume/weather variance is due to an increase in electricity usage in the service territory in 2007 compared to the same period in 2006 . the first quarter 2006 was affected by customer losses following hurricane katrina . entergy new orleans estimates that approximately 132000 electric customers and 86000 gas customers have returned and are taking service as of december 31 , 2007 , compared to approximately 95000 electric customers and 65000 gas customers as of december 31 , 2006 . billed retail electricity usage increased a total of 540 gwh compared to the same period in 2006 , an increase of 14% ( 14 % ) . the rider revenue variance is due primarily to a storm reserve rider effective march 2007 as a result of the city council's approval of a settlement agreement in october 2006 . the approved storm reserve has been set to collect $ 75 million over a ten-year period through the rider and the funds will be held in a restricted escrow account . the settlement agreement is discussed in note 2 to the financial statements . the net wholesale revenue variance is due to more energy available for resale in 2006 due to the decrease in retail usage caused by customer losses following hurricane katrina . in addition , 2006 revenue includes the sales into the wholesale market of entergy new orleans' share of the output of grand gulf , pursuant to city council approval of measures proposed by entergy new orleans to address the reduction in entergy new orleans' retail customer usage caused by hurricane katrina and to provide revenue support for the costs of entergy new orleans' share of grand other income statement variances 2008 compared to 2007 other operation and maintenance expenses decreased primarily due to : a provision for storm-related bad debts of $ 11 million recorded in 2007 ; a decrease of $ 6.2 million in legal and professional fees ; a decrease of $ 3.4 million in employee benefit expenses ; and a decrease of $ 1.9 million in gas operations spending due to higher labor and material costs for reliability work in 2007. .

Questions:
what was the net change in net revenue for entergy new orleans from 2006 to 2007?
what were net revenues in 2006?
what is the percent change?

Answers:
38.8
192.2
20.2%
table of content part ii item 5 . market for the registrant's common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities our common stock is traded on the new york stock exchange under the trading symbol 201chfc . 201d in september 2018 , our board of directors approved a $ 1 billion share repurchase program , which replaced all existing share repurchase programs , authorizing us to repurchase common stock in the open market or through privately negotiated transactions . the timing and amount of stock repurchases will depend on market conditions and corporate , regulatory and other relevant considerations . this program may be discontinued at any time by the board of directors . the following table includes repurchases made under this program during the fourth quarter of 2018 . period total number of shares purchased average price paid per share total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs maximum dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs .

total number ofshares purchased: october 2018: 1360987
november 2018: 450000
december 2018: 912360
total for october to december 2018: 2723347
average pricepaid per share: october 2018: 66.34
november 2018: 61.36
december 2018: 53.93
total number ofshares purchasedas part of publicly announced plans or programs: october 2018: 1360987
november 2018: 450000
december 2018: 810000
total for october to december 2018: 2620987
maximum dollarvalue of sharesthat may yet bepurchased under the plans or programs: october 2018: 859039458
november 2018: 831427985
december 2018: 787613605

during the quarter ended december 31 , 2018 , 102360 shares were withheld from certain executives and employees under the terms of our share-based compensation agreements to provide funds for the payment of payroll and income taxes due at vesting of restricted stock awards . as of february 13 , 2019 , we had approximately 97419 stockholders , including beneficial owners holding shares in street name . we intend to consider the declaration of a dividend on a quarterly basis , although there is no assurance as to future dividends since they are dependent upon future earnings , capital requirements , our financial condition and other factors. .

Questions:
what percentage of the total of shares acquired in the last quarter of 2018 were purchased in december?
and what percentage of them were purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs?

Answers:
33.5%
96.2%
measurement point december 31 booking holdings nasdaq composite index s&p 500 rdg internet composite .

booking holdings inc .: 2013: 100
2014: 98.09
2015: 109.68
2016: 126.12
2017: 149.5
2018: 148.18
nasdaqcomposite index: 2013: 100
2014: 114.62
2015: 122.81
2016: 133.19
2017: 172.11
2018: 165.84
s&p 500index: 2013: 100
2014: 113.69
2015: 115.26
2016: 129.05
2017: 157.22
2018: 150.33
rdg internetcomposite: 2013: 100
2014: 96.39
2015: 133.2
2016: 140.23
2017: 202.15
2018: 201.16

.

Questions:
what was the change in value for booking holding inc. in 2018, assuming a $100 initial investment?
what is the percent change?
what was the nasdaq composite value in 2018?
what is the net change also assuming a $100 initial investment?
what is the percent change?
what was the difference in the percent changes?

Answers:
48.18
48.18%
165.84
65.84
65.84%
17.66%
stock performance graph : the graph below shows the cumulative total shareholder return assuming the investment of $ 100 , on december 31 , 2012 , and the reinvestment of dividends thereafter , if any , in the company 2019s common stock versus the standard and poor 2019s s&p 500 retail index ( 201cs&p 500 retail index 201d ) and the standard and poor 2019s s&p 500 index ( 201cs&p 500 201d ) . .

december 31 , 2012: o 2019reilly automotive inc .: 100
s&p 500 retail index: 100
s&p 500: 100
december 31 , 2013: o 2019reilly automotive inc .: 144
s&p 500 retail index: 144
s&p 500: 130
december 31 , 2014: o 2019reilly automotive inc .: 215
s&p 500 retail index: 158
s&p 500: 144
december 31 , 2015: o 2019reilly automotive inc .: 283
s&p 500 retail index: 197
s&p 500: 143
december 31 , 2016: o 2019reilly automotive inc .: 311
s&p 500 retail index: 206
s&p 500: 157
december 31 , 2017: o 2019reilly automotive inc .: 269
s&p 500 retail index: 265
s&p 500: 187

.

Questions:
what is the net change in value of an investment in s&p500 from 2014 to 2016?
what is the value of the investment in 2014?
what roi does this represent?

Answers:
13
144
9.0%
stock price performance the following graph shows a comparison of the cumulative total return on our common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 index and the standard & poor 2019s retail index . the graph assumes that the value of an investment in our common stock and in each such index was $ 100 on january 3 , 2009 , and that any dividends have been reinvested . the comparison in the graph below is based solely on historical data and is not intended to forecast the possible future performance of our common stock . comparison of cumulative total return among advance auto parts , inc. , s&p 500 index and s&p retail index company/index january 3 , january 2 , january 1 , december 31 , december 29 , december 28 .

january 3 2009: advance auto parts: 100
s&p 500 index: 100
s&p retail index: 100
january 2 2010: advance auto parts: 119.28
s&p 500 index: 119.67
s&p retail index: 141.28
january 1 2011: advance auto parts: 195.8
s&p 500 index: 134.97
s&p retail index: 174.7
december 31 2011: advance auto parts: 206.86
s&p 500 index: 134.96
s&p retail index: 179.79
december 29 2012: advance auto parts: 213.14
s&p 500 index: 150.51
s&p retail index: 219.77
december 28 2013: advance auto parts: 327.63
s&p 500 index: 197.62
s&p retail index: 321.02

.

Questions:
what is the net change in value of a $100 investment in s&p 500 index from 2009 to 2011?
what fraction does this represent?
what about the return rate?

Answers:
34.97
34.97%
0.35
entergy corporation and subsidiaries management's financial discussion and analysis refer to 201cselected financial data - five-year comparison of entergy corporation and subsidiaries 201d which accompanies entergy corporation 2019s financial statements in this report for further information with respect to operating statistics . in november 2007 the board approved a plan to pursue a separation of entergy 2019s non-utility nuclear business from entergy through a spin-off of the business to entergy shareholders . in april 2010 , entergy announced that it planned to unwind the business infrastructure associated with the proposed spin-off transaction . as a result of the plan to unwind the business infrastructure , entergy recorded expenses in 2010 for the write-off of certain capitalized costs incurred in connection with the planned spin-off transaction . these costs are discussed in more detail below and throughout this section . net revenue utility following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2010 to 2009 . amount ( in millions ) .

amount ( in millions ): 2009 net revenue: 4694
volume/weather: 231
retail electric price: 137
provision for regulatory proceedings: 26
rough production cost equalization: 19
ano decommissioning trust: -24
fuel recovery: -44
other: 12
2010 net revenue: 5051

the volume/weather variance is primarily due to an increase of 8362 gwh , or 8% ( 8 % ) , in billed electricity usage in all retail sectors , including the effect on the residential sector of colder weather in the first quarter 2010 compared to 2009 and warmer weather in the second and third quarters 2010 compared to 2009 . the industrial sector reflected strong sales growth on continuing signs of economic recovery . the improvement in this sector was primarily driven by inventory restocking and strong exports with the chemicals , refining , and miscellaneous manufacturing sectors leading the improvement . the retail electric price variance is primarily due to : increases in the formula rate plan riders at entergy gulf states louisiana effective november 2009 , january 2010 , and september 2010 , at entergy louisiana effective november 2009 , and at entergy mississippi effective july 2009 ; a base rate increase at entergy arkansas effective july 2010 ; rate actions at entergy texas , including base rate increases effective in may and august 2010 ; a formula rate plan provision of $ 16.6 million recorded in the third quarter 2009 for refunds that were made to customers in accordance with settlements approved by the lpsc ; and the recovery in 2009 by entergy arkansas of 2008 extraordinary storm costs , as approved by the apsc , which ceased in january 2010 . the recovery of storm costs is offset in other operation and maintenance expenses . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the proceedings referred to above. .

Questions:
what was the net change in the amount of net revenue from 2009 to 2010?
and what portion of this net change is due to the variation in the retail electric price?

Answers:
357
38.4%
schedule iii page 6 of 6 host hotels & resorts , inc. , and subsidiaries host hotels & resorts , l.p. , and subsidiaries real estate and accumulated depreciation december 31 , 2018 ( in millions ) ( b ) the change in accumulated depreciation and amortization of real estate assets for the fiscal years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 and 2016 is as follows: .

$ 5666: depreciation and amortization: 546
dispositions and other: -344
depreciation on assets held for sale: -101
balance at december 31 2016: 5949
balance at december 31 2017: 6272
balance at december 31 2018: 6373

( c ) the aggregate cost of real estate for federal income tax purposes is approximately $ 10458 million at december 31 , 2018 . ( d ) the total cost of properties excludes construction-in-progress properties. .

Questions:
what is the balance of accumulated depreciation and amortization of real estate assets in 2016?
what about in 2015?
what is the net change?
what about the balance if accumulated depreciation and amortization of real estate assets in 2017?
what is the net change from 2016 to 2017?

Answers:
5949
5666
283
6272
323