sharick008/convfinqa huggingface dataset:
shareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the sec , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates such information by reference into such filing . the following graph shows a five year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 index , and the dow jones transportation average . the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2009 in the standard & poor 2019s 500 index , the dow jones transportation average , and our class b common stock. .

12/31/2009: united parcel service inc .: 100
standard & poor 2019s 500 index: 100
dow jones transportation average: 100
12/31/2010: united parcel service inc .: 130.29
standard & poor 2019s 500 index: 115.06
dow jones transportation average: 126.74
12/31/2011: united parcel service inc .: 135.35
standard & poor 2019s 500 index: 117.48
dow jones transportation average: 126.75
12/31/2012: united parcel service inc .: 140.54
standard & poor 2019s 500 index: 136.26
dow jones transportation average: 136.24
12/31/2013: united parcel service inc .: 205.95
standard & poor 2019s 500 index: 180.38
dow jones transportation average: 192.61
12/31/2014: united parcel service inc .: 223.79
standard & poor 2019s 500 index: 205.05
dow jones transportation average: 240.91

.

Questions:
what was the value of the united parcel service inc . in 2014?
and what was the change in its value from 2009 to 2014?
how much does this change represent, in percentage, in relation to the original 2009 value?

Answers:
223.79
123.79
123.79%
entergy arkansas , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis results of operations net income 2004 compared to 2003 net income increased $ 16.2 million due to lower other operation and maintenance expenses , a lower effective income tax rate for 2004 compared to 2003 , and lower interest charges . the increase was partially offset by lower net revenue . 2003 compared to 2002 net income decreased $ 9.6 million due to lower net revenue , higher depreciation and amortization expenses , and a higher effective income tax rate for 2003 compared to 2002 . the decrease was substantially offset by lower other operation and maintenance expenses , higher other income , and lower interest charges . net revenue 2004 compared to 2003 net revenue , which is entergy arkansas' measure of gross margin , consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related , and purchased power expenses and 2 ) other regulatory credits . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2004 to 2003. .

( in millions ): 2003 net revenue: 998.7
deferred fuel cost revisions: -16.9
other: -3.4
2004 net revenue: 978.4

deferred fuel cost revisions includes the difference between the estimated deferred fuel expense and the actual calculation of recoverable fuel expense , which occurs on an annual basis . deferred fuel cost revisions decreased net revenue due to a revised estimate of fuel costs filed for recovery at entergy arkansas in the march 2004 energy cost recovery rider , which reduced net revenue by $ 11.5 million . the remainder of the variance is due to the 2002 energy cost recovery true-up , made in the first quarter of 2003 , which increased net revenue in 2003 . gross operating revenues , fuel and purchased power expenses , and other regulatory credits gross operating revenues increased primarily due to : 2022 an increase of $ 20.7 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due to an increase in the energy cost recovery rider effective april 2004 ( fuel cost recovery revenues are discussed in note 2 to the domestic utility companies and system energy financial statements ) ; 2022 an increase of $ 15.5 million in grand gulf revenues due to an increase in the grand gulf rider effective january 2004 ; 2022 an increase of $ 13.9 million in gross wholesale revenue primarily due to increased sales to affiliated systems ; 2022 an increase of $ 9.5 million due to volume/weather primarily resulting from increased usage during the unbilled sales period , partially offset by the effect of milder weather on billed sales in 2004. .

Questions:
what was the net revenue in 2004?
and what was it in 2003?
what was, then, the change over the year?
what was the net revenue in 2003?
and how much does that change represent in relation to this 2003 net revenue, in percentage?

Answers:
998.7
978.4
20.3
978.4
2.08%
entergy new orleans , inc . and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis results of operations net income 2016 compared to 2015 net income increased $ 3.9 million primarily due to higher net revenue , partially offset by higher depreciation and amortization expenses , higher interest expense , and lower other income . 2015 compared to 2014 net income increased $ 13.9 million primarily due to lower other operation and maintenance expenses and higher net revenue , partially offset by a higher effective income tax rate . net revenue 2016 compared to 2015 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2016 to 2015 . amount ( in millions ) .

amount ( in millions ): 2015 net revenue: 293.9
retail electric price: 39
net gas revenue: -2.5
volume/weather: -5.1
other: -8.1
2016 net revenue: 317.2

the retail electric price variance is primarily due to an increase in the purchased power and capacity acquisition cost recovery rider , as approved by the city council , effective with the first billing cycle of march 2016 , primarily related to the purchase of power block 1 of the union power station . see note 14 to the financial statements for discussion of the union power station purchase . the net gas revenue variance is primarily due to the effect of less favorable weather on residential and commercial sales . the volume/weather variance is primarily due to a decrease of 112 gwh , or 2% ( 2 % ) , in billed electricity usage , partially offset by the effect of favorable weather on commercial sales and a 2% ( 2 % ) increase in the average number of electric customers. .

Questions:
what was the net revenue in 2016?
what was the net revenue in 2015?
what is the difference in revenues?
what was the net revenue in 2015?
what was the growth rate in net revenue?

Answers:
317.2
293.9
23.3
293.9
7.9%
2016 compared to 2015 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2016 to 2015 . amount ( in millions ) .

amount ( in millions ): 2015 net revenue: 696.3
retail electric price: 12.9
volume/weather: 4.7
net wholesale revenue: -2.4
reserve equalization: -2.8
other: -3.3
2016 net revenue: 705.4

the retail electric price variance is primarily due to a $ 19.4 million net annual increase in revenues , as approved by the mpsc , effective with the first billing cycle of july 2016 , and an increase in revenues collected through the storm damage rider . a0 see note 2 to the financial statements for more discussion of the formula rate plan and the storm damage rider . the volume/weather variance is primarily due to an increase of 153 gwh , or 1% ( 1 % ) , in billed electricity usage , including an increase in industrial usage , partially offset by the effect of less favorable weather on residential and commercial sales . the increase in industrial usage is primarily due to expansion projects in the pulp and paper industry , increased demand for existing customers , primarily in the metals industry , and new customers in the wood products industry . the net wholesale revenue variance is primarily due to entergy mississippi 2019s exit from the system agreement in november 2015 . the reserve equalization revenue variance is primarily due to the absence of reserve equalization revenue as compared to the same period in 2015 resulting from entergy mississippi 2019s exit from the system agreement in november other income statement variances 2017 compared to 2016 other operation and maintenance expenses decreased primarily due to : 2022 a decrease of $ 12 million in fossil-fueled generation expenses primarily due to lower long-term service agreement costs and a lower scope of work done during plant outages in 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016 ; and 2022 a decrease of $ 3.6 million in storm damage provisions . see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion on storm cost recovery . the decrease was partially offset by an increase of $ 4.8 million in energy efficiency costs and an increase of $ 2.7 million in compensation and benefits costs primarily due to higher incentive-based compensation accruals in 2017 as compared to the prior year . entergy mississippi , inc . management 2019s financial discussion and analysis .

Questions:
what was net revenue at the end of 2016?
what was net revenue at the end of 2015?
what was the change in net revenue?
what was the starting value, in 2015?
what is the percent change?

Answers:
705.4
696.3
9.1
696.3
1.3%
the following table illustrates the effect that a 10% ( 10 % ) unfavorable or favorable movement in foreign currency exchange rates , relative to the u.s . dollar , would have on the fair value of our forward exchange contracts as of october 30 , 2010 and october 31 , 2009: .

october 30 2010: fair value of forward exchange contracts asset: 7256
fair value of forward exchange contracts after a 10% ( 10 % ) unfavorable movement in foreign currency exchange rates asset: 22062
fair value of forward exchange contracts after a 10% ( 10 % ) favorable movement in foreign currency exchange rates liability: -7396
october 31 2009: fair value of forward exchange contracts asset: 8367
fair value of forward exchange contracts after a 10% ( 10 % ) unfavorable movement in foreign currency exchange rates asset: 20132
fair value of forward exchange contracts after a 10% ( 10 % ) favorable movement in foreign currency exchange rates liability: -6781

fair value of forward exchange contracts after a 10% ( 10 % ) unfavorable movement in foreign currency exchange rates asset . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 22062 $ 20132 fair value of forward exchange contracts after a 10% ( 10 % ) favorable movement in foreign currency exchange rates liability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ ( 7396 ) $ ( 6781 ) the calculation assumes that each exchange rate would change in the same direction relative to the u.s . dollar . in addition to the direct effects of changes in exchange rates , such changes typically affect the volume of sales or the foreign currency sales price as competitors 2019 products become more or less attractive . our sensitivity analysis of the effects of changes in foreign currency exchange rates does not factor in a potential change in sales levels or local currency selling prices. .

Questions:
what was the fair value of forward exchange contracts after a 10% ( 10 % ) unfavorable movement in foreign currency exchange rates in 2010?
what was the fair value of forward exchange contracts after a 10% ( 10 % ) unfavorable movement in foreign currency exchange rates in 2009?
what was the net change in value?
what was the fair value of forward exchange contracts after a 10% ( 10 % ) unfavorable movement in foreign currency exchange rates in 2009?
what is the percent change?

Answers:
22062
20132
1930
20132
9.6%
performance graph the following graph shows a five-year comparison of the cumulative total return on our common stock , the nasdaq composite index , the s&p 500 index and the s&p 500 information technology index from april 24 , 2009 through april 25 , 2014 . the past performance of our common stock is not indicative of the future performance of our common stock . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among netapp , inc. , the nasdaq composite index , the s&p 500 index and the s&p 500 information technology index .

4/09: netapp inc .: 100
nasdaq composite: 100
s&p 500: 100
s&p 500 information technology: 100
4/10: netapp inc .: 189.45
nasdaq composite: 144.63
s&p 500: 138.84
s&p 500 information technology: 143.49
4/11: netapp inc .: 284.75
nasdaq composite: 170.44
s&p 500: 162.75
s&p 500 information technology: 162.37
4/12: netapp inc .: 212.19
nasdaq composite: 182.57
s&p 500: 170.49
s&p 500 information technology: 186.06
4/13: netapp inc .: 190.66
nasdaq composite: 202.25
s&p 500: 199.29
s&p 500 information technology: 189.18
4/14: netapp inc .: 197.58
nasdaq composite: 253.22
s&p 500: 240.02
s&p 500 information technology: 236.12

we believe that a number of factors may cause the market price of our common stock to fluctuate significantly . see 201citem 1a . risk factors . 201d sale of unregistered securities .

Questions:
what was the performance value of the netapp inc . in 2014?
and what was the change in its performance from 2009 to that year?
how much, then, does this change represent in relation to that performance in 2009, in percentage?
and what was the change in the performance of the nasdaq composite from 2009 to 2014?
how much does this change represent in relation to the performance of that stock in 2009, in percentage?
and what is the difference between this percentage representation of the netapp inc . and the nasdaq composite?

Answers:
197.58
97.58
97.58%
153.22
153.22%
-55.64%
host hotels & resorts , inc. , host hotels & resorts , l.p. , and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) cash paid for income taxes , net of refunds received , was $ 40 million , $ 15 million , and $ 9 million in 2017 , 2016 , and 2015 , respectively . a reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits is as follows ( in millions ) : .

2017: balance at january 1: 11
balance at december 31: 11
2016: balance at january 1: 11
balance at december 31: 11

all of such uncertain tax position amounts , if recognized , would impact our reconciliation between the income tax provision calculated at the statutory u.s . federal income tax rate of 35% ( 35 % ) ( 21% ( 21 % ) beginning with calendar year 2018 ) and the actual income tax provision recorded each year . as of december 31 , 2017 , the tax years that remain subject to examination by major tax jurisdictions generally include 2014-2017 . there were no material interest or penalties recorded for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 , and 2015 . 7 . leases taxable reit subsidiaries leases we lease substantially all of our hotels to a wholly owned subsidiary that qualifies as a taxable reit subsidiary due to federal income tax restrictions on a reit 2019s ability to derive revenue directly from the operation and management of a hotel . ground leases as of december 31 , 2017 , all or a portion of 26 of our hotels are subject to ground leases , generally with multiple renewal options , all of which are accounted for as operating leases . for lease agreements with scheduled rent increases , we recognize the lease expense ratably over the term of the lease . certain of these leases contain provisions for the payment of contingent rentals based on a percentage of sales in excess of stipulated amounts . other lease information we also have leases on facilities used in our former restaurant business , all of which we subsequently subleased . these leases and subleases contain one or more renewal options , generally for five- or ten-year periods . the restaurant leases are accounted for as operating leases . our contingent liability related to these leases is $ 9 million as of december 31 , 2017 . we , however , consider the likelihood of any material funding related to these leases to be remote . our leasing activity also includes those entered into by our hotels for various types of equipment , such as computer equipment , vehicles and telephone systems . equipment leases are accounted for either as operating or capital leases , depending upon the characteristics of the particular lease arrangement . equipment leases that are characterized as capital leases are classified as furniture and equipment and are depreciated over the life of the lease . the amortization expense applicable to capitalized leases is included in depreciation expense. .

Questions:
what was the change in total cash paid for income taxes, net of refunds from 2015 to 2016, in millions?
and how much does that change represent in relation to the cash paid for income taxes, net of refunds in 2015, in percentage?

Answers:
6
67%
issuer purchases of equity securities during the three months ended december 31 , 2010 , we repurchased 1460682 shares of our common stock for an aggregate of $ 74.6 million , including commissions and fees , pursuant to our publicly announced stock repurchase program , as follows : period total number of shares purchased ( 1 ) average price paid per share total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs approximate dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs ( in millions ) .

total number of shares purchased ( 1 ): october 2010: 722890
november 2010: 400692
december 2010: 337100
total fourth quarter: 1460682
average price paid per share: october 2010: 50.76
november 2010: 51.81
december 2010: 50.89
total fourth quarter: 51.08
total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs: october 2010: 722890
november 2010: 400692
december 2010: 337100
total fourth quarter: 1460682
approximate dollar value of shares that may yet be purchasedunder the plans or programs ( in millions ): october 2010: 369.1
november 2010: 348.3
december 2010: 331.1
total fourth quarter: 331.1

( 1 ) repurchases made pursuant to the $ 1.5 billion stock repurchase program approved by our board of directors in february 2008 ( the 201cbuyback 201d ) . under this program , our management is authorized to purchase shares from time to time through open market purchases or privately negotiated transactions at prevailing prices as permitted by securities laws and other legal requirements , and subject to market conditions and other factors . to facilitate repurchases , we make purchases pursuant to trading plans under rule 10b5-1 of the exchange act , which allows us to repurchase shares during periods when we otherwise might be prevented from doing so under insider trading laws or because of self-imposed trading blackout periods . this program may be discontinued at any time . subsequent to december 31 , 2010 , we repurchased 1122481 shares of our common stock for an aggregate of $ 58.0 million , including commissions and fees , pursuant to the buyback . as of february 11 , 2011 , we had repurchased a total of 30.9 million shares of our common stock for an aggregate of $ 1.2 billion , including commissions and fees pursuant to the buyback . we expect to continue to manage the pacing of the remaining $ 273.1 million under the buyback in response to general market conditions and other relevant factors. .

Questions:
what portion of total shares repurchased in 4th quarter in 2010 was during october?
and the portion that occurred in december?

Answers:
49.5%
23.1%
stock performance graph * $ 100 invested on december 31 , 2011 in our stock or in the relevant index , including reinvestment of dividends . fiscal year ended december 31 , 2016 . ( 1 ) delphi automotive plc ( 2 ) s&p 500 2013 standard & poor 2019s 500 total return index ( 3 ) automotive supplier peer group 2013 russell 3000 auto parts index , including american axle & manufacturing , borgwarner inc. , cooper tire & rubber company , dana inc. , delphi automotive plc , dorman products inc. , federal-mogul corp. , ford motor co. , general motors co. , gentex corp. , gentherm inc. , genuine parts co. , goodyear tire & rubber co. , johnson controls international plc , lear corp. , lkq corp. , meritor inc. , standard motor products inc. , stoneridge inc. , superior industries international , tenneco inc. , tesla motors inc. , tower international inc. , visteon corp. , and wabco holdings inc . company index december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 .

december 31 2011: delphi automotive plc ( 1 ): 100
s&p 500 ( 2 ): 100
automotive supplier peer group ( 3 ): 100
december 31 2012: delphi automotive plc ( 1 ): 177.58
s&p 500 ( 2 ): 116
automotive supplier peer group ( 3 ): 127.04
december 31 2013: delphi automotive plc ( 1 ): 283.02
s&p 500 ( 2 ): 153.58
automotive supplier peer group ( 3 ): 188.67
december 31 2014: delphi automotive plc ( 1 ): 347.4
s&p 500 ( 2 ): 174.6
automotive supplier peer group ( 3 ): 203.06
december 31 2015: delphi automotive plc ( 1 ): 414.58
s&p 500 ( 2 ): 177.01
automotive supplier peer group ( 3 ): 198.34
december 31 2016: delphi automotive plc ( 1 ): 331.43
s&p 500 ( 2 ): 198.18
automotive supplier peer group ( 3 ): 202.3

dividends the company has declared and paid cash dividends of $ 0.25 and $ 0.29 per ordinary share in each quarter of 2015 and 2016 , respectively . in addition , in january 2017 , the board of directors declared a regular quarterly cash dividend of $ 0.29 per ordinary share , payable on february 15 , 2017 to shareholders of record at the close of business on february 6 , 2017. .

Questions:
what was the difference in the cash dividend between 2015 and 2016?
and the percentage increase over this time?
what was the change in price for delphi automotive plc between 12/31/11 and 12/31/16?
and the cumulative return over this time?

Answers:
0.04
16%
231.43
231.43%
fair value of financial instruments : the company 2019s financial instruments include cash and cash equivalents , marketable securities , accounts receivable , certain investments , accounts payable , borrowings , and derivative contracts . the fair values of cash and cash equivalents , accounts receivable , accounts payable , and short-term borrowings and current portion of long-term debt approximated carrying values because of the short-term nature of these instruments . available-for-sale marketable securities and investments , in addition to certain derivative instruments , are recorded at fair values as indicated in the preceding disclosures . for its long-term debt the company utilized third-party quotes to estimate fair values ( classified as level 2 ) . information with respect to the carrying amounts and estimated fair values of these financial instruments follow: .

december 31 2012 carrying value (1): long-term debt excluding current portion: 4916
december 31 2012 fair value: long-term debt excluding current portion: 5363
december 31 2012 carrying value (2): long-term debt excluding current portion: 4484
fair value: long-term debt excluding current portion: 5002

the fair values reflected above consider the terms of the related debt absent the impacts of derivative/hedging activity . the carrying amount of long-term debt referenced above is impacted by certain fixed-to-floating interest rate swaps that are designated as fair value hedges and by the designation of fixed rate eurobond securities issued by the company as hedging instruments of the company 2019s net investment in its european subsidiaries . 3m 2019s fixed-rate bonds were trading at a premium at december 31 , 2012 and 2011 due to the low interest rates and tightening of 3m 2019s credit spreads. .

Questions:
what was the carrying value of long-term debt excluding current portion at the end of 2012?
what was the fair value of long-term debt excluding current portion at the end of 2012?
what was the change in value?
what was the percent change?

Answers:
4916
4484
432
9.63%