sharick008/convfinqa huggingface dataset:
stock performance graph this performance graph shall not be deemed 201cfiled 201d for purposes of section 18 of the exchange act , or incorporated by reference into any filing of quintiles ims holdings , inc . under the exchange act or under the securities act , except as shall be expressly set forth by specific reference in such filing . the following graph shows a comparison from may 9 , 2013 ( the date our common stock commenced trading on the nyse ) through december 31 , 2016 of the cumulative total return for our common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index ( 201cs&p 500 201d ) and a select peer group . the peer group consists of cerner corporation , charles river laboratories , inc. , dun & bradstreet corporation , equifax inc. , icon plc , ihs markit ltd. , inc research holdings , laboratory corporation of america holdings , nielsen n.v. , parexel international corporation , inc. , pra health sciences , inc. , thomson reuters corporation and verisk analytics , inc . the companies in our peer group are publicly traded information services , information technology or contract research companies , and thus share similar business model characteristics to quintilesims , or provide services to similar customers as quintilesims . many of these companies are also used by our compensation committee for purposes of compensation benchmarking . the graph assumes that $ 100 was invested in quintilesims , the s&p 500 and the peer group as of the close of market on may 9 , 2013 , assumes the reinvestments of dividends , if any . the s&p 500 and our peer group are included for comparative purposes only . they do not necessarily reflect management 2019s opinion that the s&p 500 and our peer group are an appropriate measure of the relative performance of the stock involved , and they are not intended to forecast or be indicative of possible future performance of our common stock . s&p 500 quintilesims peer group .

5/9/2013: q: 100
peer group: 100
s&p 500: 100
12/31/2013: q: 110
peer group: 116
s&p 500: 114
12/31/2014: q: 140
peer group: 143
s&p 500: 127
12/31/2015: q: 163
peer group: 151
s&p 500: 126
12/31/2016: q: 181
peer group: 143
s&p 500: 138

item 6 . selected financial data we have derived the following consolidated statements of income data for 2016 , 2015 and 2014 and consolidated balance sheet data as of december 31 , 2016 and 2015 from our audited consolidated financial .

Questions:
what was the value of the q stock in 2014?
and what was the change in this value since may 2013?
how much did this change represent in relation to that value in may 2013?
in that same period, what was that change for the s&p500 stock?
and what was this change as a portion of the value of this stock in may 2013?

Answers:
140
40
40%
27
27%
notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) the following table summarizes the changes in non-vested restricted stock awards for the year ended may 31 , 2009 ( share awards in thousands ) : share awards weighted average grant-date fair value .

share awards: non-vested at may 31 2007: 278
granted: 430
vested: -159
forfeited: -27
non-vested at may 31 2008: 518
non-vested at may 31 2009: 762
weighted average grant-date fair value: non-vested at may 31 2007: 37
granted: 43
vested: 39
forfeited: 41
non-vested at may 31 2008: 39
non-vested at may 31 2009: 42

the weighted average grant-date fair value of share awards granted in the years ended may 31 , 2008 and 2007 was $ 38 and $ 45 , respectively . the total fair value of share awards vested during the years ended may 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 was $ 6.2 million , $ 4.1 million and $ 1.7 million , respectively . we recognized compensation expense for restricted stock of $ 9.0 million , $ 5.7 million , and $ 2.7 million in the years ended may 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 . as of may 31 , 2009 , there was $ 23.5 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested restricted stock awards that is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.9 years . employee stock purchase plan we have an employee stock purchase plan under which the sale of 2.4 million shares of our common stock has been authorized . employees may designate up to the lesser of $ 25000 or 20% ( 20 % ) of their annual compensation for the purchase of stock . the price for shares purchased under the plan is 85% ( 85 % ) of the market value on the last day of the quarterly purchase period . as of may 31 , 2009 , 0.8 million shares had been issued under this plan , with 1.6 million shares reserved for future issuance . the weighted average grant-date fair value of each designated share purchased under this plan was $ 6 , $ 6 and $ 8 in the years ended may 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively . these values represent the fair value of the 15% ( 15 % ) discount . note 12 2014segment information general information during fiscal 2009 , we began assessing our operating performance using a new segment structure . we made this change as a result of our june 30 , 2008 acquisition of 51% ( 51 % ) of hsbc merchant services llp in the united kingdom , in addition to anticipated future international expansion . beginning with the quarter ended august 31 , 2008 , the reportable segments are defined as north america merchant services , international merchant services , and money transfer . the following tables reflect these changes and such reportable segments for fiscal years 2009 , 2008 , and 2007. .

Questions:
how many non vested shares were outstanding as of may 31, 2009?
what was the weighted average fair value per share?
what is the product of the number of shares and the value per share?
what is that simplified?

Answers:
762
42
32004
32.0
entergy gulf states , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis .

( in millions ): 2002 net revenue: 1130.7
volume/weather: 17.8
fuel write-offs in 2002: 15.3
net wholesale revenue: 10.2
base rate decreases: -23.3
nisco gain recognized in 2002: -15.2
rate refund provisions: -11.3
other: -14.1
2003 net revenue: 1110.1

the volume/weather variance was due to higher electric sales volume in the service territory . billed usage increased a total of 517 gwh in the residential and commercial sectors . the increase was partially offset by a decrease in industrial usage of 470 gwh due to the loss of two large industrial customers to cogeneration . the customers accounted for approximately 1% ( 1 % ) of entergy gulf states' net revenue in 2002 . in 2002 , deferred fuel costs of $ 8.9 million related to a texas fuel reconciliation case were written off and $ 6.5 million in expense resulted from an adjustment in the deregulated asset plan percentage as the result of a power uprate at river bend . the increase in net wholesale revenue was primarily due to an increase in sales volume to municipal and co- op customers and also to affiliated systems related to entergy's generation resource planning . the base rate decreases were effective june 2002 and january 2003 , both in the louisiana jurisdiction . the january 2003 base rate decrease of $ 22.1 million had a minimal impact on net income due to a corresponding reduction in nuclear depreciation and decommissioning expenses associated with the change in accounting to reflect an assumed extension of river bend's useful life . in 2002 , a gain of $ 15.2 million was recognized for the louisiana portion of the 1988 nelson units 1 and 2 sale . entergy gulf states received approval from the lpsc to discontinue applying amortization of the gain against recoverable fuel , resulting in the recognition of the deferred gain in income . rate refund provisions caused a decrease in net revenue due to additional provisions recorded in 2003 compared to 2002 for potential rate actions and refunds . gross operating revenues and fuel and purchased power expenses gross operating revenues increased primarily due to an increase of $ 440.2 million in fuel cost recovery revenues as a result of higher fuel rates in both the louisiana and texas jurisdictions . fuel and purchased power expenses increased $ 471.1 million due to an increase in the market prices of natural gas and purchased power . other income statement variances 2004 compared to 2003 other operation and maintenance expenses decreased primarily due to : 2022 voluntary severance program accruals of $ 22.5 million in 2003 ; and 2022 a decrease of $ 4.3 million in nuclear material and labor costs due to reduced staff in 2004. .

Questions:
what was the percentage of deferred fuel costs out of total fuel write-offs in 2002?
what was the change in net revenue during 2003 for entergy gulf states?

Answers:
58.2%
-20.6
the company further presents total net 201ceconomic 201d investment exposure , net of deferred compensation investments and hedged investments , to reflect another gauge for investors as the economic impact of investments held pursuant to deferred compensation arrangements is substantially offset by a change in compensation expense and the impact of hedged investments is substantially mitigated by total return swap hedges . carried interest capital allocations are excluded as there is no impact to blackrock 2019s stockholders 2019 equity until such amounts are realized as performance fees . finally , the company 2019s regulatory investment in federal reserve bank stock , which is not subject to market or interest rate risk , is excluded from the company 2019s net economic investment exposure . ( dollar amounts in millions ) december 31 , december 31 .

december 31 2012: total investments gaap: 1750
investments held by consolidated sponsored investmentfunds ( 1 ): -524
net exposure to consolidated investment funds: 430
total investments as adjusted: 1656
federal reserve bank stock ( 2 ): -89
carried interest: -85
deferred compensation investments: -62
hedged investments: -209
total 201ceconomic 201d investment exposure: 1211
december 31 2011: total investments gaap: 1631
investments held by consolidated sponsored investmentfunds ( 1 ): -587
net exposure to consolidated investment funds: 475
total investments as adjusted: 1519
federal reserve bank stock ( 2 ): -328
carried interest: -21
deferred compensation investments: -65
hedged investments: -43
total 201ceconomic 201d investment exposure: 1062

total 201ceconomic 201d investment exposure . . . $ 1211 $ 1062 ( 1 ) at december 31 , 2012 and december 31 , 2011 , approximately $ 524 million and $ 587 million , respectively , of blackrock 2019s total gaap investments were maintained in sponsored investment funds that were deemed to be controlled by blackrock in accordance with gaap , and , therefore , are consolidated even though blackrock may not economically own a majority of such funds . ( 2 ) the decrease of $ 239 million related to a lower holding requirement of federal reserve bank stock held by blackrock institutional trust company , n.a . ( 201cbtc 201d ) . total investments , as adjusted , at december 31 , 2012 increased $ 137 million from december 31 , 2011 , resulting from $ 765 million of purchases/capital contributions , $ 185 million from positive market valuations and earnings from equity method investments , and $ 64 million from net additional carried interest capital allocations , partially offset by $ 742 million of sales/maturities and $ 135 million of distributions representing return of capital and return on investments. .

Questions:
what was the balance of total investments gaap in 2012?
what was the value in 2011?
what is the difference?
what was the 2011 value?
what is the difference divided by the 2011 value?

Answers:
1750
1631
119
1631
7.3%
republic services , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) 12 . share repurchases and dividends share repurchases share repurchase activity during the years ended december 31 , 2018 and 2017 follows ( in millions except per share amounts ) : .

2018: number of shares repurchased: 10.7
amount paid: 736.9
weighted average cost per share: 69.06
2017: number of shares repurchased: 9.6
amount paid: 610.7
weighted average cost per share: 63.84

as of december 31 , 2018 , there were no repurchased shares pending settlement . in october 2017 , our board of directors added $ 2.0 billion to the existing share repurchase authorization that now extends through december 31 , 2020 . share repurchases under the program may be made through open market purchases or privately negotiated transactions in accordance with applicable federal securities laws . while the board of directors has approved the program , the timing of any purchases , the prices and the number of shares of common stock to be purchased will be determined by our management , at its discretion , and will depend upon market conditions and other factors . the share repurchase program may be extended , suspended or discontinued at any time . as of december 31 , 2018 , the remaining authorized purchase capacity under our october 2017 repurchase program was $ 1.1 billion . dividends in october 2018 , our board of directors approved a quarterly dividend of $ 0.375 per share . cash dividends declared were $ 468.4 million , $ 446.3 million and $ 423.8 million for the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively . as of december 31 , 2018 , we recorded a quarterly dividend payable of $ 121.0 million to shareholders of record at the close of business on january 2 , 2019 . 13 . earnings per share basic earnings per share is computed by dividing net income attributable to republic services , inc . by the weighted average number of common shares ( including vested but unissued rsus ) outstanding during the period . diluted earnings per share is based on the combined weighted average number of common shares and common share equivalents outstanding , which include , where appropriate , the assumed exercise of employee stock options , unvested rsus and unvested psus at the expected attainment levels . we use the treasury stock method in computing diluted earnings per share. .

Questions:
what is the amount of cash dividend declared in 2018?
what about in 2017?
what is the sum for these years?
how about the cash dividend declared in 2016?
what is the sum for these three years?
what is the net change in the weighted average cost per share from 2017 to 2018?
what percentage change does this represent?

Answers:
468.4
446.3
914.7
423.8
1338.5
5.22
8.2%
jpmorgan chase & co./2016 annual report 35 five-year stock performance the following table and graph compare the five-year cumulative total return for jpmorgan chase & co . ( 201cjpmorgan chase 201d or the 201cfirm 201d ) common stock with the cumulative return of the s&p 500 index , the kbw bank index and the s&p financial index . the s&p 500 index is a commonly referenced united states of america ( 201cu.s . 201d ) equity benchmark consisting of leading companies from different economic sectors . the kbw bank index seeks to reflect the performance of banks and thrifts that are publicly traded in the u.s . and is composed of leading national money center and regional banks and thrifts . the s&p financial index is an index of financial companies , all of which are components of the s&p 500 . the firm is a component of all three industry indices . the following table and graph assume simultaneous investments of $ 100 on december 31 , 2011 , in jpmorgan chase common stock and in each of the above indices . the comparison assumes that all dividends are reinvested . december 31 , ( in dollars ) 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 .

2011: jpmorgan chase: 100
kbw bank index: 100
s&p financial index: 100
s&p 500 index: 100
2012: jpmorgan chase: 136.18
kbw bank index: 133.03
s&p financial index: 128.75
s&p 500 index: 115.99
2013: jpmorgan chase: 186.17
kbw bank index: 183.26
s&p financial index: 174.57
s&p 500 index: 153.55
2014: jpmorgan chase: 204.57
kbw bank index: 200.42
s&p financial index: 201.06
s&p 500 index: 174.55
2015: jpmorgan chase: 221.68
kbw bank index: 201.4
s&p financial index: 197.92
s&p 500 index: 176.95
2016: jpmorgan chase: 298.31
kbw bank index: 258.82
s&p financial index: 242.94
s&p 500 index: 198.1

december 31 , ( in dollars ) .

Questions:
what was the change in the value of jpmorgan chase from the original investment in 2011 to 2016?
and how much does this change represent in relation to the original investment?

Answers:
198.31
198.31%
performance graph the table below compares the cumulative total shareholder return on our common stock with the cumulative total return of ( i ) the standard & poor 2019s 500 composite stock index ( 201cs&p 500 index 201d ) , ( ii ) the standard & poor 2019s industrials index ( 201cs&p industrials index 201d ) and ( iii ) the standard & poor 2019s consumer durables & apparel index ( 201cs&p consumer durables & apparel index 201d ) , from december 31 , 2005 through december 31 , 2010 , when the closing price of our common stock was $ 12.66 . the graph assumes investments of $ 100 on december 31 , 2005 in our common stock and in each of the three indices and the reinvestment of dividends . performance graph 201020092008200720062005 s&p 500 index s&p industrials index s&p consumer durables & apparel index the table below sets forth the value , as of december 31 for each of the years indicated , of a $ 100 investment made on december 31 , 2005 in each of our common stock , the s&p 500 index , the s&p industrials index and the s&p consumer durables & apparel index and includes the reinvestment of dividends. .

2006: masco: 101.79
s&p 500 index: 115.61
s&p industrials index: 113.16
s&p consumer durables & apparel index: 106.16
2007: masco: 76.74
s&p 500 index: 121.95
s&p industrials index: 126.72
s&p consumer durables & apparel index: 84.5
2008: masco: 42.81
s&p 500 index: 77.38
s&p industrials index: 76.79
s&p consumer durables & apparel index: 56.13
2009: masco: 54.89
s&p 500 index: 97.44
s&p industrials index: 92.3
s&p consumer durables & apparel index: 76.51
2010: masco: 51.51
s&p 500 index: 111.89
s&p industrials index: 116.64
s&p consumer durables & apparel index: 99.87

in july 2007 , our board of directors authorized the purchase of up to 50 million shares of our common stock in open-market transactions or otherwise . at december 31 , 2010 , we had remaining authorization to repurchase up to 27 million shares . during 2010 , we repurchased and retired three million shares of our common stock , for cash aggregating $ 45 million to offset the dilutive impact of the 2010 grant of three million shares of long-term stock awards . we did not purchase any shares during the three months ended december 31 , 2010. .

Questions:
what was the change in the performance price of the masco common stock in the five year period ended 2010?
and what is this change as a percentage of that price in 2006?
in the last year of that period, what percentage of the shares authorized to purchase in open-market transactions or otherwise by the board of directors in 2007 were part of the remaining authorization?

Answers:
-48.49
-48.49%
54%
stock performance graph * $ 100 invested on 11/17/11 in our stock or 10/31/11 in the relevant index , including reinvestment of dividends . fiscal year ending december 31 , 2013 . ( 1 ) delphi automotive plc ( 2 ) s&p 500 2013 standard & poor 2019s 500 total return index ( 3 ) automotive supplier peer group 2013 russell 3000 auto parts index , including american axle & manufacturing , borgwarner inc. , cooper tire & rubber company , dana holding corp. , delphi automotive plc , dorman products inc. , federal-mogul corp. , ford motor co. , fuel systems solutions inc. , general motors co. , gentex corp. , gentherm inc. , genuine parts co. , johnson controls inc. , lkq corp. , lear corp. , meritor inc. , remy international inc. , standard motor products inc. , stoneridge inc. , superior industries international , trw automotive holdings corp. , tenneco inc. , tesla motors inc. , the goodyear tire & rubber co. , tower international inc. , visteon corp. , and wabco holdings inc . company index november 17 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 .

november 17 2011: delphi automotive plc ( 1 ): 100
s&p 500 ( 2 ): 100
automotive supplier peer group ( 3 ): 100
december 31 2011: delphi automotive plc ( 1 ): 100.98
s&p 500 ( 2 ): 100.8
automotive supplier peer group ( 3 ): 89.27
december 31 2012: delphi automotive plc ( 1 ): 179.33
s&p 500 ( 2 ): 116.93
automotive supplier peer group ( 3 ): 110.41
december 31 2013: delphi automotive plc ( 1 ): 285.81
s&p 500 ( 2 ): 154.8
automotive supplier peer group ( 3 ): 166.46

dividends on february 26 , 2013 , the board of directors approved the initiation of dividend payments on the company's ordinary shares . the board of directors declared a regular quarterly cash dividend of $ 0.17 per ordinary share that was paid in each quarter of 2013 . in addition , in january 2014 , the board of directors declared a regular quarterly cash dividend of $ 0.25 per ordinary share , payable on february 27 , 2014 to shareholders of record at the close of business on february 18 , 2014 . in october 2011 , the board of managers of delphi automotive llp approved a distribution of approximately $ 95 million , which was paid on december 5 , 2011 , principally in respect of taxes , to members of delphi automotive llp who held membership interests as of the close of business on october 31 , 2011. .

Questions:
what is the increase in value of an investment in delphi automotive plc from 2011 to 2013?
what return rate does this represent?

Answers:
185.81
185.81%
the following graph compares the cumulative 4-year total stockholder return on our common stock relative to the cumulative total return of the nasdaq composite index and the s&p 400 information technology index . the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock and in each index ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 on january 3 , 2009 and tracks it through december 29 , 2012 . comparison of 4 year cumulative total return* among cadence design systems , inc. , the nasdaq composite index , and s&p 400 information technology cadence design systems , inc . nasdaq composite s&p 400 information technology 12/29/121/1/11 12/31/111/2/101/3/09 *$ 100 invested on 1/3/09 in stock or 12/31/08 in index , including reinvestment of dividends . indexes calculated on month-end basis . copyright a9 2013 s&p , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies all rights reserved. .

1/3/2009: cadence design systems inc .: 100
nasdaq composite: 100
s&p 400 information technology: 100
1/2/2010: cadence design systems inc .: 155.99
nasdaq composite: 139.32
s&p 400 information technology: 151.58
1/1/2011: cadence design systems inc .: 215.1
nasdaq composite: 164.84
s&p 400 information technology: 198.02
12/31/2011: cadence design systems inc .: 270.83
nasdaq composite: 167.06
s&p 400 information technology: 174.88
12/29/2012: cadence design systems inc .: 350
nasdaq composite: 187.66
s&p 400 information technology: 201.26

the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance. .

Questions:
what was the performance price of the cadence design system in 2010?
and what was the change in that price since 2009?
how much does this change represent in relation to that 2009 performance price?
and what would be that change if 1000000 dollars were invested in 2009?
in that same period, what was the change in the performance price of the nasdaq composite?
what is this change as a portion of the 2009 performance price?
if, in 2009, that same amount of 1000000 dollars had been invested in this stock, what would be that change?

Answers:
155.99
55.99
56%
560000
39.32
39%
390000