sharick008/convfinqa huggingface dataset:
nbcuniversal media , llc consolidated statement of comprehensive income .

2015: net income: 3624
deferred gains ( losses ) on cash flow hedges net: -21
employee benefit obligations net: 60
currency translation adjustments net: -121
comprehensive income: 3542
net ( income ) loss attributable to noncontrolling interests: -210
other comprehensive ( income ) loss attributable to noncontrolling interests: 29
comprehensive income attributable to nbcuniversal: 3361
2014: net income: 3297
deferred gains ( losses ) on cash flow hedges net: 25
employee benefit obligations net: -106
currency translation adjustments net: -62
comprehensive income: 3154
net ( income ) loss attributable to noncontrolling interests: -182
other comprehensive ( income ) loss attributable to noncontrolling interests: 2014
comprehensive income attributable to nbcuniversal: 2972
2013: net income: 2122
deferred gains ( losses ) on cash flow hedges net: -5
employee benefit obligations net: 95
currency translation adjustments net: -41
comprehensive income: 2171
net ( income ) loss attributable to noncontrolling interests: -154
other comprehensive ( income ) loss attributable to noncontrolling interests: 2014
comprehensive income attributable to nbcuniversal: 2017

see accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements . 147 comcast 2015 annual report on form 10-k .

Questions:
what is the change in value of comprehensive income attributable to nbc universal from 2014 to 2015?
what is the percent change for the year?

Answers:
389
13%
provision for income taxes increased $ 1791 million in 2012 from 2011 primarily due to the increase in pretax income from continuing operations , including the impact of the resumption of sales in libya in the first quarter of 2012 . the following is an analysis of the effective income tax rates for 2012 and 2011: .

2012: statutory rate applied to income from continuing operations before income taxes: -35
effects of foreign operations including foreign tax credits: 18
change in permanent reinvestment assertion: 2014
adjustments to valuation allowances: 21
tax law changes: 2014
effective income tax rate on continuing operations: -74
2011: statutory rate applied to income from continuing operations before income taxes: -35
effects of foreign operations including foreign tax credits: 6
change in permanent reinvestment assertion: 5
adjustments to valuation allowances: 14
tax law changes: 1
effective income tax rate on continuing operations: -61

the effective income tax rate is influenced by a variety of factors including the geographic sources of income and the relative magnitude of these sources of income . the provision for income taxes is allocated on a discrete , stand-alone basis to pretax segment income and to individual items not allocated to segments . the difference between the total provision and the sum of the amounts allocated to segments appears in the "corporate and other unallocated items" shown in the reconciliation of segment income to net income below . effects of foreign operations 2013 the effects of foreign operations on our effective tax rate increased in 2012 as compared to 2011 , primarily due to the resumption of sales in libya in the first quarter of 2012 , where the statutory rate is in excess of 90 percent . change in permanent reinvestment assertion 2013 in the second quarter of 2011 , we recorded $ 716 million of deferred u.s . tax on undistributed earnings of $ 2046 million that we previously intended to permanently reinvest in foreign operations . offsetting this tax expense were associated foreign tax credits of $ 488 million . in addition , we reduced our valuation allowance related to foreign tax credits by $ 228 million due to recognizing deferred u.s . tax on previously undistributed earnings . adjustments to valuation allowances 2013 in 2012 and 2011 , we increased the valuation allowance against foreign tax credits because it is more likely than not that we will be unable to realize all u.s . benefits on foreign taxes accrued in those years . see item 8 . financial statements and supplementary data - note 10 to the consolidated financial statements for further information about income taxes . discontinued operations is presented net of tax , and reflects our downstream business that was spun off june 30 , 2011 and our angola business which we agreed to sell in 2013 . see item 8 . financial statements and supplementary data 2013 notes 3 and 6 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information. .

Questions:
what was the net change in the valuation allowances between 2011 and 2012?
what was the value of allowances in 2011?
what was the percent change?

Answers:
7
14
50%
lkq corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) note 5 . long-term obligations ( continued ) as part of the consideration for business acquisitions completed during 2007 , 2006 and 2005 , we issued promissory notes totaling approximately $ 1.7 million , $ 7.2 million and $ 6.4 million , respectively . the notes bear interest at annual rates of 3.0% ( 3.0 % ) to 6.0% ( 6.0 % ) , and interest is payable at maturity or in monthly installments . we also assumed certain liabilities in connection with a business acquisition during the second quarter of 2005 , including a promissory note with a remaining principle balance of approximately $ 0.2 million . the annual interest rate on the note , which was retired during 2006 , was note 6 . commitments and contingencies operating leases we are obligated under noncancelable operating leases for corporate office space , warehouse and distribution facilities , trucks and certain equipment . the future minimum lease commitments under these leases at december 31 , 2007 are as follows ( in thousands ) : years ending december 31: .

$ 42335: 2009: 33249
2010: 25149
2011: 17425
2012: 11750
thereafter: 28581
future minimum lease payments: 158489

rental expense for operating leases was approximately $ 27.4 million , $ 18.6 million and $ 12.2 million during the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 and 2005 , respectively . we guaranty the residual values of the majority of our truck and equipment operating leases . the residual values decline over the lease terms to a defined percentage of original cost . in the event the lessor does not realize the residual value when a piece of equipment is sold , we would be responsible for a portion of the shortfall . similarly , if the lessor realizes more than the residual value when a piece of equipment is sold , we would be paid the amount realized over the residual value . had we terminated all of our operating leases subject to these guaranties at december 31 , 2007 , the guarantied residual value would have totaled approximately $ 24.0 million . litigation and related contingencies on december 2 , 2005 , ford global technologies , llc ( 2018 2018ford 2019 2019 ) filed a complaint with the united states international trade commission ( 2018 2018usitc 2019 2019 ) against keystone and five other named respondents , including four taiwan-based manufacturers . on december 12 , 2005 , ford filed an amended complaint . both the complaint and the amended complaint contended that keystone and the other respondents infringed 14 design patents that ford alleges cover eight parts on the 2004-2005 .

Questions:
what is the difference in rental expense between 2005 and 2006?
and the specific value for 2005?
so what was the percentage change during this time?

Answers:
6.4
12.2
52%
mastercard incorporated notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) ( in thousands , except percent and per share data ) the following table summarizes expected benefit payments through 2019 for the pension plans , including those payments expected to be paid from the company 2019s general assets . since the majority of the benefit payments are made in the form of lump-sum distributions , actual benefit payments may differ from expected benefit payments. .

$ 18181: 2011: 27090
2012: 21548
2013: 25513
2014: 24002
2015-2019: 128494

substantially all of the company 2019s u.s . employees are eligible to participate in a defined contribution savings plan ( the 201csavings plan 201d ) sponsored by the company . the savings plan allows employees to contribute a portion of their base compensation on a pre-tax and after-tax basis in accordance with specified guidelines . the company matches a percentage of employees 2019 contributions up to certain limits . in 2007 and prior years , the company could also contribute to the savings plan a discretionary profit sharing component linked to company performance during the prior year . beginning in 2008 , the discretionary profit sharing amount related to prior year company performance was paid directly to employees as a short-term cash incentive bonus rather than as a contribution to the savings plan . in addition , the company has several defined contribution plans outside of the united states . the company 2019s contribution expense related to all of its defined contribution plans was $ 40627 , $ 35341 and $ 26996 for 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively . note 13 . postemployment and postretirement benefits the company maintains a postretirement plan ( the 201cpostretirement plan 201d ) providing health coverage and life insurance benefits for substantially all of its u.s . employees hired before july 1 , 2007 . the company amended the life insurance benefits under the postretirement plan effective january 1 , 2007 . the impact , net of taxes , of this amendment was an increase of $ 1715 to accumulated other comprehensive income in 2007 . in 2009 , the company recorded a $ 3944 benefit expense as a result of enhanced postretirement medical benefits under the postretirement plan provided to employees that chose to participate in a voluntary transition program. .

Questions:
what is the ratio of benefit payments in 2013 to 2012?
what is that less 1?

Answers:
1.1840
18.40%
stock price performance the following graph shows a comparison of the cumulative total return on our common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 index and the standard & poor 2019s retail index . the graph assumes that the value of an investment in our common stock and in each such index was $ 100 on january 3 , 2009 , and that any dividends have been reinvested . the comparison in the graph below is based solely on historical data and is not intended to forecast the possible future performance of our common stock . comparison of cumulative total return among advance auto parts , inc. , s&p 500 index and s&p retail index company/index january 3 , january 2 , january 1 , december 31 , december 29 , december 28 .

january 3 2009: advance auto parts: 100
s&p 500 index: 100
s&p retail index: 100
january 2 2010: advance auto parts: 119.28
s&p 500 index: 119.67
s&p retail index: 141.28
january 1 2011: advance auto parts: 195.8
s&p 500 index: 134.97
s&p retail index: 174.7
december 31 2011: advance auto parts: 206.86
s&p 500 index: 134.96
s&p retail index: 179.79
december 29 2012: advance auto parts: 213.14
s&p 500 index: 150.51
s&p retail index: 219.77
december 28 2013: advance auto parts: 327.63
s&p 500 index: 197.62
s&p retail index: 321.02

.

Questions:
what was the price of advance auto parts in 2011?
what was the price in 2009?
what is the difference?
what is the percent change?
what is that times 1?

Answers:
195.80
100
95.8
95.8%
0.96
part ii item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities the following table presents reported quarterly high and low per share sale prices of our common stock on the nyse for the years 2015 and 2014. .

high: quarter ended march 31: 84.9
quarter ended june 30: 90.73
quarter ended september 30: 99.9
quarter ended december 31: 106.31
2014: high
low: quarter ended march 31: 78.38
quarter ended june 30: 80.1
quarter ended september 30: 89.05
quarter ended december 31: 90.2
2014: low

on february 19 , 2016 , the closing price of our common stock was $ 87.32 per share as reported on the nyse . as of february 19 , 2016 , we had 423897556 outstanding shares of common stock and 159 registered holders . dividends as a reit , we must annually distribute to our stockholders an amount equal to at least 90% ( 90 % ) of our reit taxable income ( determined before the deduction for distributed earnings and excluding any net capital gain ) . generally , we have distributed and expect to continue to distribute all or substantially all of our reit taxable income after taking into consideration our utilization of net operating losses ( 201cnols 201d ) . we have two series of preferred stock outstanding , 5.25% ( 5.25 % ) mandatory convertible preferred stock , series a , issued in may 2014 ( the 201cseries a preferred stock 201d ) , with a dividend rate of 5.25% ( 5.25 % ) , and the 5.50% ( 5.50 % ) mandatory convertible preferred stock , series b ( the 201cseries b preferred stock 201d ) , issued in march 2015 , with a dividend rate of 5.50% ( 5.50 % ) . dividends are payable quarterly in arrears , subject to declaration by our board of directors . the amount , timing and frequency of future distributions will be at the sole discretion of our board of directors and will be dependent upon various factors , a number of which may be beyond our control , including our financial condition and operating cash flows , the amount required to maintain our qualification for taxation as a reit and reduce any income and excise taxes that we otherwise would be required to pay , limitations on distributions in our existing and future debt and preferred equity instruments , our ability to utilize nols to offset our distribution requirements , limitations on our ability to fund distributions using cash generated through our trss and other factors that our board of directors may deem relevant . we have distributed an aggregate of approximately $ 2.3 billion to our common stockholders , including the dividend paid in january 2016 , primarily subject to taxation as ordinary income . during the year ended december 31 , 2015 , we declared the following cash distributions: .

Questions:
what was the low for share price for the quarter ended 12/31/15?
and the high during that period?
so what was the difference between the high and low for this period?
and the growth rate from the low to the high?

Answers:
87.32
104.12
-16.8
-16.1%
stock options 2005 stock and incentive plan in june 2005 , the stockholders of the company approved the 2005 stock and incentive plan ( the 2005 stock plan ) . upon adoption of the 2005 stock plan , issuance of options under the company 2019s existing 2000 stock plan ceased . additionally , in connection with the acquisition of solexa , the company assumed stock options granted under the 2005 solexa equity incentive plan ( the 2005 solexa equity plan ) . as of december 30 , 2007 , an aggregate of up to 13485619 shares of the company 2019s common stock were reserved for issuance under the 2005 stock plan and the 2005 solexa equity plan . the 2005 stock plan provides for an automatic annual increase in the shares reserved for issuance by the lesser of 5% ( 5 % ) of outstanding shares of the company 2019s common stock on the last day of the immediately preceding fiscal year , 1200000 shares or such lesser amount as determined by the company 2019s board of directors . as of december 30 , 2007 , options to purchase 1834384 shares remained available for future grant under the 2005 stock plan and 2005 solexa equity plan . the company 2019s stock option activity under all stock option plans from january 2 , 2005 through december 30 , 2007 is as follows : options weighted- average exercise price .

options: outstanding at january 2 2005: 6205020
granted: 3784508
exercised: -2179286
cancelled: -964740
outstanding at january 1 2006: 7325431
outstanding at december 31 2006: 8359120
options assumed through business combination: 1424332
outstanding at december 30 2007: 10423934
weighted- average exercise price: outstanding at january 2 2005: 6.99
granted: 40.64
exercised: 12.06
cancelled: 22.38
outstanding at january 1 2006: 7.96
outstanding at december 31 2006: 13.94
options assumed through business combination: 21.37
outstanding at december 30 2007: 24.26

illumina , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) .

Questions:
what is the number of options granted by the price per share in 2007?
what is that simplified?

Answers:
153802405.1
153.8
3 . discontinued operations during the second quarter of 2012 , the board of directors authorized the sale of our homecare business , which had previously been reported as part of the merchant gases operating segment . this business has been accounted for as a discontinued operation . in the third quarter of 2012 , we sold the majority of our homecare business to the linde group for sale proceeds of 20ac590 million ( $ 777 ) and recognized a gain of $ 207.4 ( $ 150.3 after-tax , or $ .70 per share ) . the sale proceeds included 20ac110 million ( $ 144 ) that was contingent on the outcome of certain retender arrangements . these proceeds were reflected in payables and accrued liabilities on our consolidated balance sheet as of 30 september 2013 . based on the outcome of the retenders , we were contractually required to return proceeds to the linde group . in the fourth quarter of 2014 , we made a payment to settle this liability and recognized a gain of $ 1.5 . during the third quarter of 2012 , an impairment charge of $ 33.5 ( $ 29.5 after-tax , or $ .14 per share ) was recorded to write down the remaining business , which was primarily in the united kingdom and ireland , to its estimated net realizable value . in the fourth quarter of 2013 , an additional charge of $ 18.7 ( $ 13.6 after-tax , or $ .06 per share ) was recorded to update our estimate of the net realizable value . in the first quarter of 2014 , we sold the remaining portion of the homecare business for a36.1 million ( $ 9.8 ) and recorded a gain on sale of $ 2.4 . we entered into an operations guarantee related to the obligations under certain homecare contracts assigned in connection with the transaction . refer to note 16 , commitments and contingencies , for additional information . the results of discontinued operations are summarized below: .

2014: sales: 8.5
income before taxes: 7
income tax provision: 2014
income from operations of discontinued operations: 7
gain ( loss ) on sale of business and impairment/write-down net of tax: 3.9
income ( loss ) from discontinued operations net of tax: 4.6
2013: sales: 52.3
income before taxes: 3.8
income tax provision: 2
income from operations of discontinued operations: 3.6
gain ( loss ) on sale of business and impairment/write-down net of tax: -13.6
income ( loss ) from discontinued operations net of tax: -10
2012: sales: 258
income before taxes: 68.1
income tax provision: 20.8
income from operations of discontinued operations: 47.3
gain ( loss ) on sale of business and impairment/write-down net of tax: 120.8
income ( loss ) from discontinued operations net of tax: 168.1

the assets and liabilities classified as discontinued operations for the homecare business at 30 september 2013 consisted of $ 2.5 in trade receivables , net , and $ 2.4 in payables and accrued liabilities . as of 30 september 2014 , no assets or liabilities were classified as discontinued operations. .

Questions:
what is the net change in sales from 2013 to 2014?
what is the total sales in 2013?
what percentage change does this represent?

Answers:
-43.8
52.3
-83.74%
december 18 , 2007 , we issued an additional 23182197 shares of common stock to citadel . the issuances were exempt from registration pursuant to section 4 ( 2 ) of the securities act of 1933 , and each purchaser has represented to us that it is an 201caccredited investor 201d as defined in regulation d promulgated under the securities act of 1933 , and that the common stock was being acquired for investment . we did not engage in a general solicitation or advertising with regard to the issuances of the common stock and have not offered securities to the public in connection with the issuances . see item 1 . business 2014citadel investment . performance graph the following performance graph shows the cumulative total return to a holder of the company 2019s common stock , assuming dividend reinvestment , compared with the cumulative total return , assuming dividend reinvestment , of the standard & poor 2019s ( 201cs&p 201d ) 500 and the s&p super cap diversified financials during the period from december 31 , 2002 through december 31 , 2007. .

12/02: e*trade financial corporation: 100
s&p 500: 100
s&p super cap diversified financials: 100
12/03: e*trade financial corporation: 260.29
s&p 500: 128.68
s&p super cap diversified financials: 139.29
12/04: e*trade financial corporation: 307.61
s&p 500: 142.69
s&p super cap diversified financials: 156.28
12/05: e*trade financial corporation: 429.22
s&p 500: 149.7
s&p super cap diversified financials: 170.89
12/06: e*trade financial corporation: 461.32
s&p 500: 173.34
s&p super cap diversified financials: 211.13
12/07: e*trade financial corporation: 73.05
s&p 500: 182.87
s&p super cap diversified financials: 176.62

2022 $ 100 invested on 12/31/02 in stock or index-including reinvestment of dividends . fiscal year ending december 31 . 2022 copyright a9 2008 , standard & poor 2019s , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies , inc . all rights reserved . www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm .

Questions:
what was the change in the value of the common stock for e*trade financial corporation from 2004 to 2005?
and what was that value in 2004?
how much, then, does that change represent in relation to this 2004 value, in percentage?

Answers:
121.61
307.61
39.5%
shareholder return performance presentation the graph presented below compares the cumulative total shareholder return on state street's common stock to the cumulative total return of the s&p 500 index , the s&p financial index and the kbw bank index over a five- year period . the cumulative total shareholder return assumes the investment of $ 100 in state street common stock and in each index on december 31 , 2008 at the closing price on the last trading day of 2008 , and also assumes reinvestment of common stock dividends . the s&p financial index is a publicly available measure of 81 of the standard & poor's 500 companies , representing 17 diversified financial services companies , 22 insurance companies , 19 real estate companies and 23 banking companies . the kbw bank index seeks to reflect the performance of banks and thrifts that are publicly traded in the u.s. , and is composed of 24 leading national money center and regional banks and thrifts. .

2008: state street corporation: 100
s&p 500 index: 100
s&p financial index: 100
kbw bank index: 100
2009: state street corporation: 111
s&p 500 index: 126
s&p financial index: 117
kbw bank index: 98
2010: state street corporation: 118
s&p 500 index: 146
s&p financial index: 132
kbw bank index: 121
2011: state street corporation: 105
s&p 500 index: 149
s&p financial index: 109
kbw bank index: 93
2012: state street corporation: 125
s&p 500 index: 172
s&p financial index: 141
kbw bank index: 122
2013: state street corporation: 198
s&p 500 index: 228
s&p financial index: 191
kbw bank index: 168

.

Questions:
what was the kbw bank index in 2011?
and the starting value in 2008?
so what was the change in price during this time?
and the roi during these years?

Answers:
93
100
-7
-7%