sharick008/convfinqa huggingface dataset:
18 2015 annual report performance graph the following chart presents a comparison for the five-year period ended june 30 , 2015 , of the market performance of the company 2019s common stock with the s&p 500 index and an index of peer companies selected by the company : comparison of 5 year cumulative total return among jack henry & associates , inc. , the s&p 500 index , and a peer group the following information depicts a line graph with the following values: .

2010: jkhy: 100
peer group: 100
s&p 500: 100
2011: jkhy: 127.44
peer group: 136.78
s&p 500: 130.69
2012: jkhy: 148.62
peer group: 148.1
s&p 500: 137.81
2013: jkhy: 205.6
peer group: 174.79
s&p 500: 166.2
2014: jkhy: 263.21
peer group: 239.1
s&p 500: 207.1
2015: jkhy: 290.88
peer group: 301.34
s&p 500: 222.47

this comparison assumes $ 100 was invested on june 30 , 2010 , and assumes reinvestments of dividends . total returns are calculated according to market capitalization of peer group members at the beginning of each period . peer companies selected are in the business of providing specialized computer software , hardware and related services to financial institutions and other businesses . companies in the peer group are aci worldwide , inc. , bottomline technology , inc. , broadridge financial solutions , cardtronics , inc. , convergys corp. , corelogic , inc. , dst systems , inc. , euronet worldwide , inc. , fair isaac corp. , fidelity national information services , inc. , fiserv , inc. , global payments , inc. , heartland payment systems , inc. , moneygram international , inc. , ss&c technologies holdings , inc. , total systems services , inc. , tyler technologies , inc. , verifone systems , inc. , and wex , inc. . micros systems , inc . was removed from the peer group as it was acquired in september 2014. .

Questions:
what was the value of the jkhy stock in 2011?
and what was it in 2010?
by how much, then, did it change over the year?
and for the subsequent year of this period, what was the change in the value of the peer group stock?
what is this change as a percentage of that value in 2011?

Answers:
127.44
100.00
27.44
11.32
8.3%
the graph below matches cadence design systems , inc . 2019s cumulative 5-year total shareholder return on common stock with the cumulative total returns of the s&p 500 index , the s&p information technology index , and the nasdaq composite index . the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock , and in each index ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 on december 28 , 2002 and tracks it through december 29 , 2007 . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among cadence design systems , inc. , the s&p 500 index , the nasdaq composite index and the s&p information technology index 12/29/0712/30/0612/31/051/1/051/3/0412/28/02 cadence design systems , inc . nasdaq composite s & p information technology s & p 500 * $ 100 invested on 12/28/02 in stock or on 12/31/02 in index-including reinvestment of dividends . indexes calculated on month-end basis . copyright b7 2007 , standard & poor 2019s , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies , inc . all rights reserved . www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm .

12/28/02: cadence design systems inc .: 100
s & p 500: 100
nasdaq composite: 100
s & p information technology: 100
1/3/04: cadence design systems inc .: 149.92
s & p 500: 128.68
nasdaq composite: 149.75
s & p information technology: 147.23
1/1/05: cadence design systems inc .: 113.38
s & p 500: 142.69
nasdaq composite: 164.64
s & p information technology: 150.99
12/31/05: cadence design systems inc .: 138.92
s & p 500: 149.7
nasdaq composite: 168.6
s & p information technology: 152.49
12/30/06: cadence design systems inc .: 147.04
s & p 500: 173.34
nasdaq composite: 187.83
s & p information technology: 165.32
12/29/07: cadence design systems inc .: 139.82
s & p 500: 182.87
nasdaq composite: 205.22
s & p information technology: 192.28

the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance .

Questions:
what was the performance value of the cadence design systems inc . in 2007?
and what was the change in that value from 2002 to 2007?
how much does this change represent in relation to the 2002 performance value of that stock, in percentage?

Answers:
139.82
39.82
39.82%
stock performance graph the following performance graph compares the cumulative total return ( including dividends ) to the holders of our common stock from december 31 , 2002 through december 31 , 2007 , with the cumulative total returns of the nyse composite index , the ftse nareit composite reit index ( the 201call reit index 201d ) , the ftse nareit healthcare equity reit index ( the 201chealthcare reit index 201d ) and the russell 1000 index over the same period . the comparison assumes $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2002 in our common stock and in each of the foregoing indices and assumes reinvestment of dividends , as applicable . we have included the nyse composite index in the performance graph because our common stock is listed on the nyse . we have included the other indices because we believe that they are either most representative of the industry in which we compete , or otherwise provide a fair basis for comparison with ventas , and are therefore particularly relevant to an assessment of our performance . the figures in the table below are rounded to the nearest dollar. .

12/31/2002: ventas: 100
nyse composite index: 100
all reit index: 100
healthcare reit index: 100
russell 1000 index: 100
12/31/2003: ventas: 206
nyse composite index: 132
all reit index: 138
healthcare reit index: 154
russell 1000 index: 130
12/31/2004: ventas: 270
nyse composite index: 151
all reit index: 181
healthcare reit index: 186
russell 1000 index: 145
12/31/2005: ventas: 331
nyse composite index: 166
all reit index: 196
healthcare reit index: 189
russell 1000 index: 154
12/31/2006: ventas: 457
nyse composite index: 200
all reit index: 262
healthcare reit index: 273
russell 1000 index: 178
12/31/2007: ventas: 512
nyse composite index: 217
all reit index: 215
healthcare reit index: 279
russell 1000 index: 188

ventas nyse composite index all reit index healthcare reit index russell 1000 index .

Questions:
what was the value of reit index in 2003?
and what was, then, the change in its value considering the original amount invested in it in 2002?
how much does this change represent in relation to this original amount?

Answers:
138
38
38%
measurement point december 31 booking holdings nasdaq composite index s&p 500 rdg internet composite .

booking holdings inc .: 2012: 100
2013: 187.37
2014: 183.79
2015: 205.51
2016: 236.31
2017: 280.1
nasdaqcomposite index: 2012: 100
2013: 141.63
2014: 162.09
2015: 173.33
2016: 187.19
2017: 242.29
s&p 500index: 2012: 100
2013: 132.39
2014: 150.51
2015: 152.59
2016: 170.84
2017: 208.14
rdg internetcomposite: 2012: 100
2013: 163.02
2014: 158.81
2015: 224.05
2016: 235.33
2017: 338.52

sales of unregistered securities between october 1 , 2017 and december 31 , 2017 , we issued 103343 shares of our common stock in connection with the conversion of $ 196.1 million principal amount of our 1.0% ( 1.0 % ) convertible senior notes due 2018 . the conversions were effected in accordance with the indenture , which provides that the principal amount of converted notes be paid in cash and the conversion premium be paid in cash and/or shares of common stock at our election . in each case , we chose to pay the conversion premium in shares of common stock ( fractional shares are paid in cash ) . the issuances of the shares were not registered under the securities act of 1933 , as amended ( the "act" ) pursuant to section 3 ( a ) ( 9 ) of the act. .

Questions:
what was the difference between the booking holdings inc. of 2017 and 2012?
how much, in percentage, does that difference represent in relation to the booking holdings inc. of 2012?
and what was the difference between the s&p 500 index of 2017 and 2012?
how much, in percentage, does that difference represent in relation to the s&p 500 index of 2012?
what is, then, the difference between the percentage difference in booking holdings inc and the one in s&p 500 index?

Answers:
180.10
180.10%
108.14
108.14%
71.96%
entergy mississippi , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis the net wholesale revenue variance is primarily due to lower profit on joint account sales and reduced capacity revenue from the municipal energy agency of mississippi . gross operating revenues , fuel and purchased power expenses , and other regulatory charges gross operating revenues increased primarily due to an increase of $ 152.5 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due to higher fuel rates , partially offset by a decrease of $ 43 million in gross wholesale revenues due to a decrease in net generation and purchases in excess of decreased net area demand resulting in less energy available for resale sales coupled with a decrease in system agreement remedy receipts . fuel and purchased power expenses increased primarily due to increases in the average market prices of natural gas and purchased power , partially offset by decreased demand and decreased recovery from customers of deferred fuel costs . other regulatory charges increased primarily due to increased recovery through the grand gulf rider of grand gulf capacity costs due to higher rates and increased recovery of costs associated with the power management recovery rider . there is no material effect on net income due to quarterly adjustments to the power management recovery rider . 2007 compared to 2006 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2007 to 2006 . amount ( in millions ) .

amount ( in millions ): 2006 net revenue: 466.1
base revenue: 7.9
volume/weather: 4.5
transmission revenue: 4.1
transmission equalization: 4
reserve equalization: 3.8
attala costs: -10.2
other: 6.7
2007 net revenue: 486.9

the base revenue variance is primarily due to a formula rate plan increase effective july 2007 . the formula rate plan filing is discussed further in "state and local rate regulation" below . the volume/weather variance is primarily due to increased electricity usage primarily in the residential and commercial sectors , including the effect of more favorable weather on billed electric sales in 2007 compared to 2006 . billed electricity usage increased 214 gwh . the increase in usage was partially offset by decreased usage in the industrial sector . the transmission revenue variance is due to higher rates and the addition of new transmission customers in late 2006 . the transmission equalization variance is primarily due to a revision made in 2006 of transmission equalization receipts among entergy companies . the reserve equalization variance is primarily due to a revision in 2006 of reserve equalization payments among entergy companies due to a ferc ruling regarding the inclusion of interruptible loads in reserve .

Questions:
what was the difference in net revenue between 2006 and 2007?
and the amount due to volume/weather?
so what percentage of the change was due to this aspect?

Answers:
20.8
4.5
35%
entergy new orleans , inc . management 2019s financial discussion and analysis plan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business see the 201cplan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business 201d section of entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis for a discussion of this matter , including the planned retirement of debt and preferred securities . results of operations net income 2011 compared to 2010 net income increased $ 4.9 million primarily due to lower other operation and maintenance expenses , lower taxes other than income taxes , a lower effective income tax rate , and lower interest expense , partially offset by lower net revenue . 2010 compared to 2009 net income remained relatively unchanged , increasing $ 0.6 million , primarily due to higher net revenue and lower interest expense , almost entirely offset by higher other operation and maintenance expenses , higher taxes other than income taxes , lower other income , and higher depreciation and amortization expenses . net revenue 2011 compared to 2010 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2011 to 2010 . amount ( in millions ) .

amount ( in millions ): 2010 net revenue: 272.9
retail electric price: -16.9
net gas revenue: -9.1
gas cost recovery asset: -3
volume/weather: 5.4
other: -2.3
2011 net revenue: 247

the retail electric price variance is primarily due to formula rate plan decreases effective october 2010 and october 2011 . see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the formula rate plan filing . the net gas revenue variance is primarily due to milder weather in 2011 compared to 2010 . the gas cost recovery asset variance is primarily due to the recognition in 2010 of a $ 3 million gas operations regulatory asset associated with the settlement of entergy new orleans 2019s electric and gas formula rate plan case and the amortization of that asset . see note 2 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the formula rate plan settlement. .

Questions:
what was the net change in value of net revenues from 2010 to 2011?
what was the value in 2010?
what was the percent change?

Answers:
-25.9
272.9
-9.5%
common stock from time to time through open market purchases or privately negotiated transactions at prevailing prices as permitted by securities laws and other legal requirements , and subject to stock price , business and market conditions and other factors . we have been funding and expect to continue to fund stock repurchases through a combination of cash on hand and cash generated by operations . in the future , we may also choose to fund our stock repurchase program under our revolving credit facility or future financing transactions . there were no repurchases of our series a and b common stock during the three months ended december 31 , 2013 . the company first announced its stock repurchase program on august 3 , 2010 . stock performance graph the following graph sets forth the cumulative total shareholder return on our series a common stock , series b common stock and series c common stock as compared with the cumulative total return of the companies listed in the standard and poor 2019s 500 stock index ( 201cs&p 500 index 201d ) and a peer group of companies comprised of cbs corporation class b common stock , scripps network interactive , inc. , time warner , inc. , twenty-first century fox , inc . class a common stock ( news corporation class a common stock prior to june 2013 ) , viacom , inc . class b common stock and the walt disney company . the graph assumes $ 100 originally invested on december 31 , 2008 in each of our series a common stock , series b common stock and series c common stock , the s&p 500 index , and the stock of our peer group companies , including reinvestment of dividends , for the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2010 , 2011 , 2012 and 2013 . december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 .

december 312008: disca: 100
discb: 100
disck: 100
s&p 500: 100
peer group: 100
december 312009: disca: 216.6
discb: 207.32
disck: 198.06
s&p 500: 123.45
peer group: 151.63
december 312010: disca: 294.49
discb: 287.71
disck: 274.01
s&p 500: 139.23
peer group: 181
december 312011: disca: 289.34
discb: 277.03
disck: 281.55
s&p 500: 139.23
peer group: 208.91
december 312012: disca: 448.31
discb: 416.52
disck: 436.89
s&p 500: 157.9
peer group: 286.74
december 312013: disca: 638.56
discb: 602.08
disck: 626.29
s&p 500: 204.63
peer group: 454.87

equity compensation plan information information regarding securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans will be set forth in our definitive proxy statement for our 2014 annual meeting of stockholders under the caption 201csecurities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans , 201d which is incorporated herein by reference. .

Questions:
what was the last year for which there was still information about the performance of the s&p 500?
and what was the first year?
for how many years, then, there was information available about the performance of the s&p 500?
what was the value of that stock in 2013?
and what was the change in the value of that stock from 2008 to 2013?
considering the five year period of this change, what then was its annual average?

Answers:
2013
2008
5
204.63
104.63
20.93
shareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the sec , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates such information by reference into such filing . the following graph shows a five year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 index , and the dow jones transportation average . the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2009 in the standard & poor 2019s 500 index , the dow jones transportation average , and our class b common stock. .

12/31/2009: united parcel service inc .: 100
standard & poor 2019s 500 index: 100
dow jones transportation average: 100
12/31/2010: united parcel service inc .: 130.29
standard & poor 2019s 500 index: 115.06
dow jones transportation average: 126.74
12/31/2011: united parcel service inc .: 135.35
standard & poor 2019s 500 index: 117.48
dow jones transportation average: 126.75
12/31/2012: united parcel service inc .: 140.54
standard & poor 2019s 500 index: 136.26
dow jones transportation average: 136.24
12/31/2013: united parcel service inc .: 205.95
standard & poor 2019s 500 index: 180.38
dow jones transportation average: 192.61
12/31/2014: united parcel service inc .: 223.79
standard & poor 2019s 500 index: 205.05
dow jones transportation average: 240.91

.

Questions:
what the value of the investment in ups in 2012?
what about in 2010?
what is the net change in value of this investment?
what roi does this represent?

Answers:
140.54
130.29
10.25
7.9%
devon energy corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2013 ( continued ) debt maturities as of december 31 , 2013 , excluding premiums and discounts , are as follows ( in millions ) : .

$ 4067: 2015: 2014
2016: 500
2017: 750
2018: 125
2019 and thereafter: 6600
total: 12042

credit lines devon has a $ 3.0 billion syndicated , unsecured revolving line of credit ( the 201csenior credit facility 201d ) that matures on october 24 , 2018 . however , prior to the maturity date , devon has the option to extend the maturity for up to one additional one-year period , subject to the approval of the lenders . amounts borrowed under the senior credit facility may , at the election of devon , bear interest at various fixed rate options for periods of up to twelve months . such rates are generally less than the prime rate . however , devon may elect to borrow at the prime rate . the senior credit facility currently provides for an annual facility fee of $ 3.8 million that is payable quarterly in arrears . as of december 31 , 2013 , there were no borrowings under the senior credit facility . the senior credit facility contains only one material financial covenant . this covenant requires devon 2019s ratio of total funded debt to total capitalization , as defined in the credit agreement , to be no greater than 65 percent . the credit agreement contains definitions of total funded debt and total capitalization that include adjustments to the respective amounts reported in the accompanying financial statements . also , total capitalization is adjusted to add back noncash financial write-downs such as full cost ceiling impairments or goodwill impairments . as of december 31 , 2013 , devon was in compliance with this covenant with a debt-to- capitalization ratio of 25.7 percent . commercial paper devon has access to $ 3.0 billion of short-term credit under its commercial paper program . commercial paper debt generally has a maturity of between 1 and 90 days , although it can have a maturity of up to 365 days , and bears interest at rates agreed to at the time of the borrowing . the interest rate is generally based on a standard index such as the federal funds rate , libor , or the money market rate as found in the commercial paper market . as of december 31 , 2013 , devon 2019s weighted average borrowing rate on its commercial paper borrowings was 0.30 percent . other debentures and notes following are descriptions of the various other debentures and notes outstanding at december 31 , 2013 , as listed in the table presented at the beginning of this note . geosouthern debt in december 2013 , in conjunction with the planned geosouthern acquisition , devon issued $ 2.25 billion aggregate principal amount of fixed and floating rate senior notes resulting in cash proceeds of approximately .

Questions:
what is the total debt maturities for 2016 and 2017?
what is the total debt maturities?
what percentage of total debt maturities does debt due in 2016 and 2017 represent?
what is the percentage value?

Answers:
1250
12042
0.1038
10.38