sharick008/convfinqa huggingface dataset:
item 5 . market for the registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities the following graph compares annual total return of our common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 composite stock index ( 201cs&p 500 index 201d ) and our peer group ( 201cloews peer group 201d ) for the five years ended december 31 , 2016 . the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock , the s&p 500 index and the loews peer group was $ 100 on december 31 , 2011 and that all dividends were reinvested. .

2011: loews common stock: 100
s&p 500 index: 100
loews peer group ( a ): 100
2012: loews common stock: 108.91
s&p 500 index: 116
loews peer group ( a ): 113.39
2013: loews common stock: 129.64
s&p 500 index: 153.57
loews peer group ( a ): 142.85
2014: loews common stock: 113.59
s&p 500 index: 174.6
loews peer group ( a ): 150.44
2015: loews common stock: 104.47
s&p 500 index: 177.01
loews peer group ( a ): 142.44
2016: loews common stock: 128.19
s&p 500 index: 198.18
loews peer group ( a ): 165.34

( a ) the loews peer group consists of the following companies that are industry competitors of our principal operating subsidiaries : chubb limited ( name change from ace limited after it acquired the chubb corporation on january 15 , 2016 ) , w.r . berkley corporation , the chubb corporation ( included through january 15 , 2016 when it was acquired by ace limited ) , energy transfer partners l.p. , ensco plc , the hartford financial services group , inc. , kinder morgan energy partners , l.p . ( included through november 26 , 2014 when it was acquired by kinder morgan inc. ) , noble corporation , spectra energy corp , transocean ltd . and the travelers companies , inc . dividend information we have paid quarterly cash dividends in each year since 1967 . regular dividends of $ 0.0625 per share of loews common stock were paid in each calendar quarter of 2016 and 2015. .

Questions:
what was the value of loews common stock in 2012?
what is that less 100?
what is the change divided by 100?

Answers:
108.91
8.91
8.9%
shareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the sec , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates such information by reference into such filing . the following graph shows a five year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 index , and the dow jones transportation average . the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2009 in the standard & poor 2019s 500 index , the dow jones transportation average , and our class b common stock. .

12/31/2009: united parcel service inc .: 100
standard & poor 2019s 500 index: 100
dow jones transportation average: 100
12/31/2010: united parcel service inc .: 130.29
standard & poor 2019s 500 index: 115.06
dow jones transportation average: 126.74
12/31/2011: united parcel service inc .: 135.35
standard & poor 2019s 500 index: 117.48
dow jones transportation average: 126.75
12/31/2012: united parcel service inc .: 140.54
standard & poor 2019s 500 index: 136.26
dow jones transportation average: 136.24
12/31/2013: united parcel service inc .: 205.95
standard & poor 2019s 500 index: 180.38
dow jones transportation average: 192.61
12/31/2014: united parcel service inc .: 223.79
standard & poor 2019s 500 index: 205.05
dow jones transportation average: 240.91

.

Questions:
what was the value of the s&p500 in 2012?
and what was it in 2010?
what was, then, the change in its value over the year?
what was the value of the s&p500 in 2010?
and how much does that change represent in relation to this 2010 value?

Answers:
136.26
115.06
21.2
115.06
18.4%
stock performance graph the following line-graph presentation compares our cumulative shareholder returns with the standard & poor 2019s information technology index and the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index for the past five years . the line graph assumes the investment of $ 100 in our common stock , the standard & poor 2019s information technology index , and the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index on may 31 , 2002 and assumes reinvestment of all dividends . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among global payments inc. , the s&p 500 index and the s&p information technology index 5/02 5/03 5/04 5/05 5/06 5/07 global payments inc . s&p 500 s&p information technology * $ 100 invested on 5/31/02 in stock or index-including reinvestment of dividends . fiscal year ending may 31 . global payments s&p 500 information technology .

global payments: may 31 2002: 100
may 31 2003: 94.2
may 31 2004: 129.77
may 31 2005: 193.3
may 31 2006: 260.35
may 31 2007: 224.24
s&p 500: may 31 2002: 100
may 31 2003: 91.94
may 31 2004: 108.79
may 31 2005: 117.75
may 31 2006: 127.92
may 31 2007: 157.08
s&p information technology: may 31 2002: 100
may 31 2003: 94.48
may 31 2004: 115.24
may 31 2005: 116.29
may 31 2006: 117.14
may 31 2007: 144.11

issuer purchases of equity securities on april 5 , 2007 , our board of directors authorized repurchases of our common stock in an amount up to $ 100 million . the board has authorized us to purchase shares from time to time as market conditions permit . there is no expiration date with respect to this authorization . no amounts have been repurchased during the fiscal year ended may 31 , 2007. .

Questions:
what is the net change in value of global payments from 2003 to 2004?
what is the percent change?

Answers:
35.57
37.8%
shareholder return performance presentation the graph presented below compares the cumulative total shareholder return on state street's common stock to the cumulative total return of the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index over a five-year period . the cumulative total shareholder return assumes the investment of $ 100 in state street common stock and in each index on december 31 , 2007 at the closing price on the last trading day of 2007 , and also assumes reinvestment of common stock dividends . the s&p financial index is a publicly available measure of 80 of the standard & poor's 500 companies , representing 26 diversified financial services companies , 22 insurance companies , 17 real estate companies and 15 banking companies . comparison of five-year cumulative total shareholder return .

2007: state street corporation: 100
s&p 500 index: 100
s&p financial index: 100
2008: state street corporation: 49
s&p 500 index: 63
s&p financial index: 45
2009: state street corporation: 55
s&p 500 index: 80
s&p financial index: 52
2010: state street corporation: 58
s&p 500 index: 92
s&p financial index: 59
2011: state street corporation: 52
s&p 500 index: 94
s&p financial index: 49
2012: state street corporation: 61
s&p 500 index: 109
s&p financial index: 63

.

Questions:
what is the change in the value of an investment in state street corporation from 2007 to 2009?
what is the initial investment?
what roi does this represent?
what about the change in value in s&p 500 index for the same period?
what is the initial value for s&p500 index?
what roi does this represent?

Answers:
-45
100
-45.0%
-20
100
-20%
shareholder return performance presentation the graph presented below compares the cumulative total shareholder return on state street's common stock to the cumulative total return of the s&p 500 index , the s&p financial index and the kbw bank index over a five- year period . the cumulative total shareholder return assumes the investment of $ 100 in state street common stock and in each index on december 31 , 2008 at the closing price on the last trading day of 2008 , and also assumes reinvestment of common stock dividends . the s&p financial index is a publicly available measure of 81 of the standard & poor's 500 companies , representing 17 diversified financial services companies , 22 insurance companies , 19 real estate companies and 23 banking companies . the kbw bank index seeks to reflect the performance of banks and thrifts that are publicly traded in the u.s. , and is composed of 24 leading national money center and regional banks and thrifts. .

2008: state street corporation: 100
s&p 500 index: 100
s&p financial index: 100
kbw bank index: 100
2009: state street corporation: 111
s&p 500 index: 126
s&p financial index: 117
kbw bank index: 98
2010: state street corporation: 118
s&p 500 index: 146
s&p financial index: 132
kbw bank index: 121
2011: state street corporation: 105
s&p 500 index: 149
s&p financial index: 109
kbw bank index: 93
2012: state street corporation: 125
s&p 500 index: 172
s&p financial index: 141
kbw bank index: 122
2013: state street corporation: 198
s&p 500 index: 228
s&p financial index: 191
kbw bank index: 168

.

Questions:
what was the change in the value of the state street corporation, considering its value in 2013 and the original amount invested in it in 2008?
and how much does this change represent in relation to that original amount invested?

Answers:
5
5%
note 9 . commitments and contingencies operating leases we are obligated under noncancelable operating leases for corporate office space , warehouse and distribution facilities , trucks and certain equipment . the future minimum lease commitments under these leases at december 31 , 2009 are as follows ( in thousands ) : years ending december 31: .

$ 55178: 2011: 45275
2012: 36841
2013: 30789
2014: 22094
thereafter: 59263
future minimum lease payments: 249440

rental expense for operating leases was approximately $ 57.2 million , $ 49.0 million and $ 26.6 million during the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively . we guarantee the residual values of the majority of our truck and equipment operating leases . the residual values decline over the lease terms to a defined percentage of original cost . in the event the lessor does not realize the residual value when a piece of equipment is sold , we would be responsible for a portion of the shortfall . similarly , if the lessor realizes more than the residual value when a piece of equipment is sold , we would be paid the amount realized over the residual value . had we terminated all of our operating leases subject to these guarantees at december 31 , 2009 , the guaranteed residual value would have totaled approximately $ 27.8 million . litigation and related contingencies in december 2005 and may 2008 , ford global technologies , llc filed complaints with the international trade commission against us and others alleging that certain aftermarket parts imported into the u.s . infringed on ford design patents . the parties settled these matters in april 2009 pursuant to a settlement arrangement that expires in september 2011 . pursuant to the settlement , we ( and our designees ) became the sole distributor in the united states of aftermarket automotive parts that correspond to ford collision parts that are covered by a united states design patent . we have paid ford an upfront fee for these rights and will pay a royalty for each such part we sell . the amortization of the upfront fee and the royalty expenses are reflected in cost of goods sold on the accompanying consolidated statements of income . we also have certain other contingencies resulting from litigation , claims and other commitments and are subject to a variety of environmental and pollution control laws and regulations incident to the ordinary course of business . we currently expect that the resolution of such contingencies will not materially affect our financial position , results of operations or cash flows . note 10 . business combinations on october 1 , 2009 , we acquired greenleaf auto recyclers , llc ( 201cgreenleaf 201d ) from ssi for $ 38.8 million , net of cash acquired . greenleaf is the entity through which ssi operated its late model automotive parts recycling business . we recorded a gain on bargain purchase for the greenleaf acquisition totaling $ 4.3 million , which is .

Questions:
what was the net change in value of rental expense for operating leases from 2007 to 2008?
what is that difference divided by the 2007 value?

Answers:
22.4
84%
transfer agent and registrar for common stock the transfer agent and registrar for our common stock is : computershare shareowner services llc 480 washington boulevard 29th floor jersey city , new jersey 07310 telephone : ( 877 ) 363-6398 sales of unregistered securities not applicable . repurchase of equity securities the following table provides information regarding our purchases of our equity securities during the period from october 1 , 2015 to december 31 , 2015 . total number of shares ( or units ) purchased 1 average price paid per share ( or unit ) 2 total number of shares ( or units ) purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs 3 maximum number ( or approximate dollar value ) of shares ( or units ) that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs 3 .

total number ofshares ( or units ) purchased1: october 1 - 31: 2140511
november 1 - 30: 1126378
december 1 - 31: 1881992
total: 5148881
average price paidper share ( or unit ) 2: october 1 - 31: 20.54
november 1 - 30: 22.95
december 1 - 31: 22.97
total: 21.96
total number ofshares ( or units ) purchased as part ofpublicly announcedplans or programs3: october 1 - 31: 2139507
november 1 - 30: 1124601
december 1 - 31: 1872650
total: 5136758
maximum number ( or approximate dollar value ) of shares ( or units ) that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs3: october 1 - 31: 227368014
november 1 - 30: 201557625
december 1 - 31: 158553178

1 included shares of our common stock , par value $ 0.10 per share , withheld under the terms of grants under employee stock-based compensation plans to offset tax withholding obligations that occurred upon vesting and release of restricted shares ( the 201cwithheld shares 201d ) . we repurchased 1004 withheld shares in october 2015 , 1777 withheld shares in november 2015 and 9342 withheld shares in december 2015 . 2 the average price per share for each of the months in the fiscal quarter and for the three-month period was calculated by dividing the sum of the applicable period of the aggregate value of the tax withholding obligations and the aggregate amount we paid for shares acquired under our stock repurchase program , described in note 5 to the consolidated financial statements , by the sum of the number of withheld shares and the number of shares acquired in our stock repurchase program . 3 in february 2015 , the board authorized a share repurchase program to repurchase from time to time up to $ 300.0 million , excluding fees , of our common stock ( the 201c2015 share repurchase program 201d ) . on february 12 , 2016 , we announced that our board had approved a new share repurchase program to repurchase from time to time up to $ 300.0 million , excluding fees , of our common stock . the new authorization is in addition to any amounts remaining for repurchase under the 2015 share repurchase program . there is no expiration date associated with the share repurchase programs. .

Questions:
what is the total number of shares purchased in october times the average price per share?
what is that simplified?

Answers:
43966096
44.0
entergy texas , inc . and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis results of operations net income 2017 compared to 2016 net income decreased $ 31.4 million primarily due to lower net revenue , higher depreciation and amortization expenses , higher other operation and maintenance expenses , and higher taxes other than income taxes . 2016 compared to 2015 net income increased $ 37.9 million primarily due to lower other operation and maintenance expenses , the asset write-off of its receivable associated with the spindletop gas storage facility in 2015 , and higher net revenue . net revenue 2017 compared to 2016 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2017 to 2016 . amount ( in millions ) .

amount ( in millions ): 2016 net revenue: 644.2
net wholesale revenue: -35.1
purchased power capacity: -5.9
transmission revenue: -5.4
reserve equalization: 5.6
retail electric price: 19
other: 4.4
2017 net revenue: 626.8

the net wholesale revenue variance is primarily due to lower net capacity revenues resulting from the termination of the purchased power agreements between entergy louisiana and entergy texas in august 2016 . the purchased power capacity variance is primarily due to increased expenses due to capacity cost changes for ongoing purchased power capacity contracts . the transmission revenue variance is primarily due to a decrease in the amount of transmission revenues allocated by miso . the reserve equalization variance is due to the absence of reserve equalization expenses in 2017 as a result of entergy texas 2019s exit from the system agreement in august 2016 . see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the system agreement. .

Questions:
what was the net difference in net revenue from 2016 to 2017?
what was the percent change?

Answers:
17.4
.027
table of contents capital deployment program will be subject to market and economic conditions , applicable legal requirements and other relevant factors . our capital deployment program does not obligate us to continue a dividend for any fixed period , and payment of dividends may be suspended at any time at our discretion . stock performance graph the following stock performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or 201cfiled 201d with the securities and exchange commission , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filings under the securities act of 1933 or the exchange act , each as amended , except to the extent that we specifically incorporate it by reference into such filing . the following stock performance graph compares our cumulative total stockholder return on an annual basis on our common stock with the cumulative total return on the standard and poor 2019s 500 stock index and the amex airline index from december 9 , 2013 ( the first trading day of aag common stock ) through december 31 , 2015 . the comparison assumes $ 100 was invested on december 9 , 2013 in aag common stock and in each of the foregoing indices and assumes reinvestment of dividends . the stock performance shown on the graph below represents historical stock performance and is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance. .

12/9/2013: american airlines group inc .: 100
amex airline index: 100
s&p 500: 100
12/31/2013: american airlines group inc .: 103
amex airline index: 102
s&p 500: 102
12/31/2014: american airlines group inc .: 219
amex airline index: 152
s&p 500: 114
12/31/2015: american airlines group inc .: 175
amex airline index: 127
s&p 500: 113

purchases of equity securities by the issuer and affiliated purchasers since july 2014 , our board of directors has approved several share repurchase programs aggregating $ 7.0 billion of authority of which , as of december 31 , 2015 , $ 2.4 billion remained unused under repurchase programs .

Questions:
what was the value of american airlines in 2015?
what was the value in 2014?
what was the difference from 2014 to 2015?
what is the percent decrease?

Answers:
175
219
-44
-20%
the table below summarizes activity of rsus with performance conditions for the year ended december 31 , shares ( in thousands ) weighted average grant date fair value ( per share ) .

shares ( in thousands ): non-vested total as of december 31 2016: 309
granted: 186
vested: -204
forfeited: -10
non-vested total as of december 31 2017: 281
weightedaverage grantdate fair value ( per share ): non-vested total as of december 31 2016: 55.94
granted: 63.1
vested: 46.1
forfeited: 70.5
non-vested total as of december 31 2017: 67.33

as of december 31 , 2017 , $ 6 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to the nonvested rsus , with and without performance conditions , is expected to be recognized over the weighted-average remaining life of 1.5 years . the total fair value of rsus , with and without performance conditions , vested was $ 16 million , $ 14 million and $ 12 million for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . if dividends are paid with respect to shares of the company 2019s common stock before the rsus are distributed , the company credits a liability for the value of the dividends that would have been paid if the rsus were shares of company common stock . when the rsus are distributed , the company pays the participant a lump sum cash payment equal to the value of the dividend equivalents accrued . the company accrued dividend equivalents totaling less than $ 1 million , $ 1 million and $ 1 million to accumulated deficit in the accompanying consolidated statements of changes in stockholders 2019 equity for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . employee stock purchase plan the company maintains a nonqualified employee stock purchase plan ( the 201cespp 201d ) through which employee participants may use payroll deductions to acquire company common stock at the lesser of 90% ( 90 % ) of the fair market value of the common stock at either the beginning or the end of a three-month purchase period . on february 15 , 2017 , the board adopted the american water works company , inc . and its designated subsidiaries 2017 nonqualified employee stock purchase plan , which was approved by stockholders on may 12 , 2017 and took effect on august 5 , 2017 . the prior plan was terminated as to new purchases of company stock effective august 31 , 2017 . as of december 31 , 2017 , there were 2.0 million shares of common stock reserved for issuance under the espp . the espp is considered compensatory . during the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , the company issued 93 thousand , 93 thousand and 98 thousand shares , respectively , under the espp. .

Questions:
what was the total of granted shares, in thousands?
and how much is that, not in thousands?
what was the weighted average grant date fair value ( per share )?
what was, then, the total value of those granted shares?

Answers:
186
186000
63.10
11736600.00