Question: who has the power (judicial) to make decisions in courts of law
[{'answer': 'judges', 'provenance': [{'wikipedia_id': '58792', 'title': 'Judicial discretion', 'start_paragraph_id': 1, 'start_character': 173, 'end_paragraph_id': 1, 'end_character': 179, 'bleu_score': 1.0, 'section': 'Section::::Abstract.'}]}, {'provenance': [{'wikipedia_id': '58792', 'title': 'Judicial discretion', 'start_paragraph_id': 0, 'start_character': 0, 'end_paragraph_id': 0, 'end_character': 0, 'bleu_score': 1.0, 'meta': {'yes_no_answer': 'NONE', 'annotation_id': 5682883703433365999}, 'section': 'Section::::Abstract.'}]}, {'provenance': [{'wikipedia_id': '58792', 'title': 'Judicial discretion', 'start_paragraph_id': 1, 'start_character': 0, 'end_paragraph_id': 1, 'end_character': 365, 'bleu_score': 0.9657992495762461, 'meta': {'yes_no_answer': 'NONE', 'annotation_id': 5682883703433365999}, 'section': 'Section::::Abstract.'}]}, {'provenance': [{'wikipedia_id': '23042843', 'title': 'Judicial review', 'section': 'Section::::General principles.\n', 'start_paragraph_id': 7, 'end_paragraph_id': 7, 'meta': {'evidence_span': ["review to stem the tyranny of the majority. Another reason why judicial review should be understood in the context of both the development of two distinct legal systems (civil law and common law) and two theories of democracy (legislative supremacy and separation of powers) is that some countries with common-law systems do not have judicial review of primary legislation. Though a common-law system is present in the United Kingdom, the country still has a strong attachment to the idea of legislative supremacy; consequently, judges in the United Kingdom do not have the power to strike down primary legislation. However, since the United Kingdom became a member of the European Union there has been tension between its tendency toward legislative supremacy and the EU's legal system, which specifically gives the Court of Justice of the European Union the power of judicial review.", 'Though a common-law system is present in the United Kingdom, the country still has a strong attachment to the idea of legislative supremacy; consequently, judges in the United Kingdom do not have the power to strike down primary legislation.', "review to stem the tyranny of the majority. Another reason why judicial review should be understood in the context of both the development of two distinct legal systems (civil law and common law) and two theories of democracy (legislative supremacy and separation of powers) is that some countries with common-law systems do not have judicial review of primary legislation. Though a common-law system is present in the United Kingdom, the country still has a strong attachment to the idea of legislative supremacy; consequently, judges in the United Kingdom do not have the power to strike down primary legislation. However, since the United Kingdom became a member of the European Union there has been tension between its tendency toward legislative supremacy and the EU's legal system, which specifically gives the Court of Justice of the European Union the power of judicial review."]}}]}, {'provenance': [{'wikipedia_id': '58792', 'title': 'Judicial discretion', 'section': 'Section::::Abstract.', 'start_paragraph_id': 1, 'end_paragraph_id': 1, 'meta': {'evidence_span': ['Judicial discretion is the power of the judiciary to make some legal decisions according to their discretion. Under the doctrine of the separation of powers, the ability of judges to exercise discretion is an aspect of judicial independence. Where appropriate, judicial discretion allows a judge to decide a legal case or matter within a range of possible decisions.', 'Judicial discretion is the power of the judiciary to make some legal decisions according to their discretion. Under the doctrine of the separation of powers, the ability of judges to exercise discretion is an aspect of judicial independence.', 'Judicial discretion is the power of the judiciary to make some legal decisions according to their discretion. Under the doctrine of the separation of powers, the ability of judges to exercise discretion is an aspect of judicial independence. Where appropriate, judicial discretion allows a judge to decide a legal case or matter within a range of possible decisions.']}}]}]