Question: who said one man's vulgarity is another's lyric
[{'answer': 'Justice Harlan', 'provenance': [{'wikipedia_id': '421807', 'title': 'Cohen v. California', 'start_paragraph_id': 7, 'start_character': 114, 'end_paragraph_id': 7, 'end_character': 128, 'bleu_score': 1.0, 'section': "Section::::The Court's decision.\n"}]}, {'provenance': [{'wikipedia_id': '421807', 'title': 'Cohen v. California', 'start_paragraph_id': 0, 'start_character': 0, 'end_paragraph_id': 0, 'end_character': 0, 'bleu_score': 1.0, 'meta': {'yes_no_answer': 'NONE', 'annotation_id': 7094982009258900999}, 'section': 'Section::::Abstract.'}]}, {'provenance': [{'wikipedia_id': '421807', 'title': 'Cohen v. California', 'section': "Section::::The Court's decision.\n", 'start_paragraph_id': 7, 'end_paragraph_id': 7, 'meta': {'evidence_span': ["The Court, by a vote of 54, per Justice John Marshall Harlan II, overturned the appellate court's ruling. First, Justice Harlan", 'The Court, by a vote of 54, per Justice John Marshall Harlan II, overturned the appellate court\'s ruling. First, Justice Harlan began by emphasizing that this case concerned "speech", and not "conduct", as was at issue in "United States v. O\'Brien". Harlan then stated that any attempt by California to abridge the content of Cohen\'s speech would be no doubt unconstitutional except in a few instances, like, for example, if California was regulating the time, place, or manner of Cohen\'s speech independent from the content of the speech"," or if Cohen\'s speech attempted to disrupt the draft. Harlan claimed that expressing views on the immorality of the draft could not be construed as an attempt to disrupt the draft, and to do so would be a violation of the First and Fourteenth Amendments.', 'First, Justice Harlan began by emphasizing that this case concerned "speech", and not "conduct", as was at issue in "United States v. O\'Brien".']}}]}]