Question: when did they stop saying mass in latin
[{'answer': '1967', 'provenance': [{'wikipedia_id': '2493363', 'title': 'Latin Mass', 'start_paragraph_id': 5, 'start_character': 503, 'end_paragraph_id': 5, 'end_character': 507, 'bleu_score': 1.0, 'section': 'Section::::Tridentine Mass in Latin.\n'}]}, {'answer': 'from 1967 onwards', 'provenance': [{'wikipedia_id': '2493363', 'title': 'Latin Mass', 'start_paragraph_id': 5, 'start_character': 498, 'end_paragraph_id': 5, 'end_character': 515, 'bleu_score': 1.0, 'section': 'Section::::Tridentine Mass in Latin.\n'}]}, {'provenance': [{'wikipedia_id': '2493363', 'title': 'Latin Mass', 'start_paragraph_id': 0, 'start_character': 0, 'end_paragraph_id': 0, 'end_character': 0, 'bleu_score': 1.0, 'meta': {'yes_no_answer': 'NONE', 'annotation_id': 10204004868518478858}, 'section': 'Section::::Abstract.'}]}, {'provenance': [{'wikipedia_id': '2493363', 'title': 'Latin Mass', 'start_paragraph_id': 5, 'start_character': 0, 'end_paragraph_id': 5, 'end_character': 601, 'bleu_score': 0.979896933041101, 'meta': {'yes_no_answer': 'NONE', 'annotation_id': 10204004868518478858}, 'section': 'Section::::Tridentine Mass in Latin.\n'}]}, {'provenance': [{'wikipedia_id': '2493363', 'title': 'Latin Mass', 'section': 'Section::::Tridentine Mass in Latin.\n', 'start_paragraph_id': 5, 'end_paragraph_id': 5, 'meta': {'evidence_span': ['A further distancing between the concepts of "Tridentine Mass" and "Latin Mass" was brought about by the 1964 Instruction on implementing the Constitution on Sacred Liturgy of the Second Vatican Council, which laid down that "normally the epistle and gospel from the Mass of the day shall be read in the vernacular". Episcopal conferences were to decide, with the consent of the Holy See, what other parts, if any, of the Mass were to be celebrated in the vernacular. Permissions were thus granted from 1967 onwards to celebrate most of the Tridentine Mass in vernacular languages, including the Canon.\rhighlight sentence(s) containing evidence, not only the answer', '1967 onwards', 'A further distancing between the concepts of "Tridentine Mass" and "Latin Mass" was brought about by the 1964 Instruction on implementing the Constitution on Sacred Liturgy of the Second Vatican Council, which laid down that "normally the epistle and gospel from the Mass of the day shall be read in the vernacular". Episcopal conferences were to decide, with the consent of the Holy See, what other parts, if any, of the Mass were to be celebrated in the vernacular. Permissions were thus granted from 1967 onwards to celebrate most of the Tridentine Mass in vernacular languages, including the Canon.']}}]}, {'provenance': [{'wikipedia_id': '147842', 'title': 'Tridentine Mass', 'section': 'Section::::Historical variations.:Typical editions of the Roman Missal.\n', 'start_paragraph_id': 36, 'end_paragraph_id': 36, 'meta': {'evidence_span': ['and the earlier "General Rubrics of the Missal". Changes made to the liturgy in 1965 and 1967 in the wake of decisions of the Second Vatican Council were not incorporated in the Roman Missal, but were reflected in the provisional vernacular translations produced when the language of the people began to be used in addition to Latin. This explains the references sometimes seen to "the 1965 Missal". The General Roman Calendar was revised partially in 1955 and 1960 and completely in 1969 in Pope Paul VI\'s "motu proprio" "\rhighlight sentence(s) containing evidence, not only the answer', 'and the earlier "General Rubrics of the Missal". Changes made to the liturgy in 1965 and 1967 in the wake of decisions of the Second Vatican Council were not incorporated in the Roman Missal, but were reflected in the provisional vernacular translations produced when the language of the people began to be used in addition to Latin. This explains the references sometimes seen to "the 1965 Missal". The General Roman Calendar was revised partially in 1955 and 1960 and completely in 1969 in Pope Paul VI\'s "motu proprio" "']}}]}, {'provenance': [{'wikipedia_id': '4543180', 'title': 'Canon of the Mass', 'section': 'Section::::History of the Canon.\n', 'start_paragraph_id': 13, 'end_paragraph_id': 13, 'meta': {'evidence_span': ['The first Christians in Rome were chiefly people who came from the East and spoke Greek. The founding of Constantinople naturally drew such people thither rather than to Rome, and then Christianity at Rome began to spread among the Roman population, so that at last the bulk of the Christian population in Rome spoke Latin. Hence the change in the language of the liturgy. ...The liturgy was said (in Latin) first in one church and then in more, until the Greek liturgy was driven out, and the clergy ceased to know Greek. About 415 or 420 we find a Pope saying he was unable to answer a letter from some Eastern bishops, because he had no one who could write Greek. "The Roman Canon is not in its primitive form" but has many "awkward transitions" that show that it is "\rhighlight sentence(s) containing evidence, not only the answer', 'The first Christians in Rome were chiefly people who came from the East and spoke Greek. The founding of Constantinople naturally drew such people thither rather than to Rome, and then Christianity at Rome began to spread among the Roman population, so that at last the bulk of the Christian population in Rome spoke Latin. Hence the change in the language of the liturgy. ...The liturgy was said (in Latin) first in one church and then in more, until the Greek liturgy was driven out, and the clergy ceased to know Greek. About 415 or 420 we find a Pope saying he was unable to answer a letter from some Eastern bishops, because he had no one who could write Greek. "The Roman Canon is not in its primitive form" but has many "awkward transitions" that show that it is "']}}]}]