Question: which philosopher advocated the idea of return to nature
[{'answer': 'Bacon', 'provenance': [{'wikipedia_id': '5938176', 'title': 'Nature (philosophy)', 'start_paragraph_id': 32, 'start_character': 67, 'end_paragraph_id': 32, 'end_character': 72, 'bleu_score': 1.0, 'section': 'Section::::Modern science and laws of nature: trying to avoid metaphysics.\n'}]}, {'provenance': [{'wikipedia_id': '5938176', 'title': 'Nature (philosophy)', 'start_paragraph_id': 0, 'start_character': 0, 'end_paragraph_id': 0, 'end_character': 0, 'bleu_score': 1.0, 'meta': {'yes_no_answer': 'NONE', 'annotation_id': 5229262655534162871}, 'section': 'Section::::Abstract.'}]}, {'provenance': [{'wikipedia_id': '5938176', 'title': 'Nature (philosophy)', 'start_paragraph_id': 35, 'start_character': 0, 'end_paragraph_id': 35, 'end_character': 467, 'bleu_score': 0.942340155314736, 'meta': {'yes_no_answer': 'NONE', 'annotation_id': 5229262655534162871}, 'section': 'Section::::Modern science and laws of nature: trying to avoid metaphysics.\n'}]}, {'provenance': [{'wikipedia_id': '1273900', 'title': 'A Guide for the Perplexed', 'section': 'Section::::Adequateness.\n', 'start_paragraph_id': 57, 'end_paragraph_id': 57, 'meta': {'evidence_span': ['objectivity" can be attained; but this is attained at the expense of knowledge of the object as a whole. Only the \'lowest\' and most superficial aspects are accessible to objective scientific instruments. He notes that science became "science for manipulation" following Descartes. Descartes promised humanity would become "masters and possessors of nature", a point of view first popularised by Francis Bacon. For Schumacher this was something of a wrong turn, because it meant the devaluation of "science for understanding" or wisdom. One of Schumacher\'s criticisms is that "science for manipulation" almost inevitably leads from the manipulation of nature to the manipulation of people. Schumacher argues that \'science for manipulation\' is a valuable tool when subordinated for "science for understanding" or wisdom; but until then "science for manipulation" has become a danger to humanity.', 'Bacon']}}]}, {'provenance': [{'wikipedia_id': '5938176', 'title': 'Nature (philosophy)', 'section': 'Section::::Modern science and laws of nature: trying to avoid metaphysics.\n', 'start_paragraph_id': 32, 'end_paragraph_id': 32, 'meta': {'evidence_span': ['In contrast, Modern Science took its distinctive turn with Francis Bacon, who rejected the four distinct causes, and saw Aristotle as someone who "did proceed in such a spirit of difference and contradiction towards all antiquity:', 'In contrast, Modern Science took its distinctive turn with Francis Bacon, who rejected the four distinct causes, and saw Aristotle as someone who "did proceed in such a spirit of difference and contradiction towards all antiquity: undertaking not only to frame new words of science at pleasure, but to confound and extinguish all ancient wisdom". He felt that lesser known Greek philosophers such as Democritus "who did not suppose a mind or reason in the frame of things", have been arrogantly dismissed because of Aristotelianism leading to a situation in his time wherein "the search of the physical causes hath been neglected, and passed in silence".', 'Bacon']}}]}]