sentence-transformers/squad huggingface dataset:
Passage: Some Western media have reported on Chinese accusations of Western media bias. The Daily Telegraph published an opinion piece by the Chinese ambassador to the United Kingdom, Fu Ying, who accused Western media of "demonising" China during their coverage of the torch relays. The Telegraph also asked its readers to send their views in response to the question "Is the West demonising China?" The BBC reported on a demonstration in Sydney by Chinese Australians "voicing support for Beijing amid controversy over Tibet" and protesting against what they saw as Western media bias. The report showed demonstrators carrying signs which read "Shame on some Western media", "BBC CNN lies too" and "Stop media distortion!". One demonstrator interviewed by the BBC stated: "I saw some news from CNN, from the BBC, some media [inaudible], and they are just lying." Libération also reported that it had been accused of bias by the Chinese media.

Question: Which United Kingdom newspaper published a Chinese ambassador's opinion that Western media had demonized China with torch coverage?

Question: What French newspaper did the Chinese media accuse of bias?

Question: Some Chinese have accused Western media of what in their reportings?

Question: Who was the Chinese ambassador to the U.K.?

Question: Which newspaper published these accusations?

Question: What other newspaper was accused of bias?
Passage: On April 17, Xinhua condemned what it called "biased coverage of the Lhasa riots and the Olympic torch relay by the U.S.-based Cable News Network (CNN)". The same day, the Chinese government called on CNN to "apologise" for having allegedly insulted the Chinese people, and for "attempting to incite the Chinese people against the government". CNN issued a statement on April 14, responded to China over 'thugs and goons' comment by Jack Cafferty.

Question: Who did Xinhua accuse of biased reporting on April 17?

Question: Who was accused of bias on April 17 by Xinhua?

Question: Who wanted CNN to apologize for its insult to Chinese people?
Passage: On April 19, the BBC reported that 1,300 people had gathered outside BBC buildings in Manchester and London, protesting against what they described as Western media bias. Several days earlier, the BBC had published an article entitled "The challenges of reporting in China", responding to earlier criticism. The BBC's Paul Danahar noted that Chinese people were now "able to access the BBC News website for the first time, after years of strict censorship", and that "many were critical of our coverage". He provided readers with a reminder of censorship in China, and added: "People who criticise the media for their coverage in Tibet should acknowledge that we were and still are banned from reporting there." He also quoted critical Chinese responses, and invited readers to comment.

Question: What article did BBC put out about China just days earlier?

Question: Who stated that Chinese people could access the BBC news website after years of not being able to?

Question: How many people gathered in protest at these two buildings?

Question: Who commented that Chinese people can look at the BBC news site for the first time?

Question: Where is BBC banned from reporting?
Passage: On April 20, the People's Daily published a report entitled "Overseas Chinese rally against biased media coverage, for Olympics". It included images of Chinese people demonstrating in France, the United Kingdom, Germany and the United States. One picture showed Chinese demonstrators holding a sign which claimed, incorrectly, that the BBC had not reported on Jin Jing. The People's Daily quoted one protestor who claimed the "BBC on some of the recent events has misled the British public and the rest of the world by providing intensive untruthful reports and biased coverage."

Question: Who published "Overseas Chinese rally against biased media coverage" on April 20?

Question: Which publication published a report about the Chinese rallying against media bias?
Passage: On April 4, it was reported that the Chinese government appeared to be running an anti-CNN website that criticizes the cable network’s coverage of recent events. The site claims to have been created by a Beijing citizen. However, foreign correspondents in Beijing voiced suspicions that Anti-cnn may be a semi-government-made website. A Chinese government spokesman insisted the site was spontaneously set up by a Chinese citizen angered over media coverage.

Question: What was the Chinese government reported running on April 4?

Question: Who supposedly created the site?

Question: Who takes credit for creating the site?

Question: Who felt that the government was involved in the website?
Passage: The Beijing Olympic Organizing Committee sent out a team of 30 unarmed attendants selected from the People's Armed Police to escort the flame throughout its journey. According to Asian Times, sworn in as the "Beijing Olympic Games Sacred Flame Protection Unit" during a ceremony in August 2007, their main job is to keep the Olympic flame alight throughout the journey and to assist in transferring the flame between the torches, the lanterns and the cauldrons. They wear matching blue tracksuits and are intended to accompany the torch every step of the way. One of the torch attendants, dubbed "Second Right Brother," has developed a significant online fan-base, particularly among China's female netizens.

Question: How many attendants accompanied the flame during it's travels?

Question: When were the 30 team members sworn in?

Question: What were their official team outfits?

Question: Which team member has his own fan following?

Question: How many attendants were used from the People's Armed Police for the flame's entire journey?

Question: When were these 30 sworn in?

Question: What did these 30 attendants wear?

Question: What is the attendant who has a large fan base called?
Passage: In China, a call to boycott French hypermart Carrefour from May 1 began spreading through mobile text messaging and online chat rooms amongst the Chinese over the weekend from April 12, accusing the company's major shareholder, the LVMH Group, of donating funds to the Dalai Lama. There were also calls to extend the boycott to include French luxury goods and cosmetic products. Chinese protesters organized boycotts of the French-owned retail chain Carrefour in major Chinese cities including Kunming, Hefei and Wuhan, accusing the French nation of pro-secessionist conspiracy and anti-Chinese racism. Some burned French flags, some added Swastika (due to its conotaions with Nazism) to the French flag, and spread short online messages calling for large protests in front of French consulates and embassy. Some shoppers who insisted on entering one of the Carrefour stores in Kunming were blocked by boycotters wielding large Chinese flags and hit by water bottles. Hundreds of people joined Anti-French rallies in Beijing, Wuhan, Hefei, Kunming and Qingdao, which quickly spread to other cities like Xi'an, Harbin and Jinan. Carrefour denied any support or involvement in the Tibetan issue, and had its staff in its Chinese stores wear uniforms emblazoned with the Chinese national flag and caps with Olympic insignia and as well as the words "Beijing 2008" to show its support for the games. The effort had to be ceased when the BOCOG deemed the use of official Olympic insignia as illegal and a violation of copyright.

Question: Which French company was boycotted?

Question: Carrefour was boycotted because of which shareholder?

Question: Who was the LVMH Group accused of supporting?

Question: What was burned during these boycotts?

Question: Who was accused of helping the Dalai Lama?

Question: Boycotters accused France of being pro-seccessionist and what?
Passage: In response to the demonstrations, the Chinese government attempted to calm the situation, possibly fearing the protests may spiral out of control as has happened in recent years, including the anti-Japanese protests in 2005. State media and commentaries began to call for calm, such as an editorial in the People's Daily which urged Chinese people to "express [their] patriotic enthusiasm calmly and rationally, and express patriotic aspiration in an orderly and legal manner". The government also began to patrol and censor the internet forums such as Sohu.com, with comments related to the Carrefour boycott removed. In the days prior to the planned boycott, evidence of efforts by Chinese authorities to choke the mass boycott's efforts online became even more evident, including barring searches of words related to the French protests, but protests broke out nonetheless in front of Carrefour's stores at Beijing, Changsha, Fuzhou and Shenyang on May 1.

Question: The Chinese government tried to tamper the boycott, trying to avoid a similar outcome to which protests in 2005?

Question: Which newspaper urged citizens to protest peacefully?

Question: Which website had mentions of the Carrefour boycott removed by the government?

Question: When did protests in front of Carrefour's stores occur in China?

Question: The Chinese government did not want a repeat of what protests?

Question: Which newspaper asked the Chinese people to protest peacefully?

Question: Who removed Carrefour boycott comments from some websites?

Question: What day did protests occur in front of Carrefour stores?
Passage: In Japan, the Mayor of Nagano, Shoichi Washizawa said that it has become a "great nuisance" for the city to host the torch relay prior to the Nagano leg. Washizawa's aides said the mayor's remark was not criticism about the relay itself but about the potential disruptions and confusion surrounding it.　A city employee of the Nagano City Office ridiculed the protests in Europe, he said "They are doing something foolish", in a televised interview. Nagano City officially apologized later and explained what he had wanted to say was "Such violent protests were not easy to accept". Also citing concerns about protests as well as the recent violence in Tibet, a major Buddhist temple in Nagano cancelled its plans to host the opening stage of the Olympic torch relay, this temple was vandalised by an un-identified person the day after in apparent revenge,

Question: Who was the mayor of Nagano?

Question: How did Washizawa refer to the city having the torch relay?

Question: What was vandalized after a relay event was cancelled there?

Question: Who was the mayor of Nagano?

Question: What did he call the opportunity for Nagano to host the torch event?

Question: Where was the inital opening ceremony to be held in Nagano?
Passage: The Olympic Flame is supposed to remain lit for the whole relay. When the Torch is extinguished at night, on airplanes, in bad weather, or during protests (such as the several occasions in Paris), the Olympic Flame is kept alight in a set of 8 lanterns.[citation needed]

Question: In what is the torch flame kept lit when the torch must be off?

Question: The torch is put out at night, on aircraft, during storms and what else?
Passage: A union planned to protest at the relay for better living conditions. Hong Kong legislator Michael Mak Kwok-fung and activist Chan Cheong, both members of the League of Social Democrats, were not allowed to enter Macau.

Question: Who was Michael Mak Kwok-fung?
Passage: Chinese media have also reported on Jin Jing, whom the official Chinese torch relay website described as "heroic" and an "angel", whereas Western media initially gave her little mention – despite a Chinese claim that "Chinese Paralympic athlete Jin Jing has garnered much attention from the media".

Question: Which athlete did the official website call an angel?

Question: Which media outlets gave Jin Jing little notice?
Passage: Two additional teams of 40 attendants each will accompany the flame on its Mainland China route. This arrangement has however sparked several controversies.

Question: How many additional teams will help with the Mainland China route?

Question: How many members are on each of these two teams?
Passage: The ultimate substantive legacy of Principia Mathematica is mixed. It is generally accepted that Kurt Gödel's incompleteness theorem of 1931 definitively demonstrated that for any set of axioms and inference rules proposed to encapsulate mathematics, there would in fact be some truths of mathematics which could not be deduced from them, and hence that Principia Mathematica could never achieve its aims. However, Gödel could not have come to this conclusion without Whitehead and Russell's book. In this way, Principia Mathematica's legacy might be described as its key role in disproving the possibility of achieving its own stated goals. But beyond this somewhat ironic legacy, the book popularized modern mathematical logic and drew important connections between logic, epistemology, and metaphysics.

Question: Despite its imperfection, what are now considered valuable achievements of Principia Mathematica?

Question: What is the general consensus of the axioms and inference rules declared in Principia Mathematica?

Question: Who discovered the incompleteness theorem of 1931?

Question: What did the incompleteness theorem of 1931 indicate regarding Principia Mathematica?

Question: Why was Gödels finding ironic?

Question: When was Kurt Godel's incompleteness theorem?

Question: What did Kurt Godel's theorem demonstrate about axioms and the inference rules?

Question: Godel couldn't have come to his conclusion without what book?

Question: Besides logic and epistemology, what else did Principia Mathematica connect?
Passage: Whitehead's most complete work on education is the 1929 book The Aims of Education and Other Essays, which collected numerous essays and addresses by Whitehead on the subject published between 1912 and 1927. The essay from which Aims of Education derived its name was delivered as an address in 1916 when Whitehead was president of the London Branch of the Mathematical Association. In it, he cautioned against the teaching of what he called "inert ideas" – ideas that are disconnected scraps of information, with no application to real life or culture. He opined that "education with inert ideas is not only useless: it is, above all things, harmful."

Question: What is the origin of the title of the book?

Question: How did Whitehead define "inert ideas"?

Question: What was Whitehead's criticism of the use of inert ideas in education?

Question: When was "The Aims of Education and Other Essays" published?

Question: During what periods of time were the essays and address contained in "The Aims of Education and Other Essays" composed?

Question: What year was The Aims of Education and Other Essays published?

Question: What was the Aims of Education and Other Essays comprised of?

Question: What teaching did Whitehead caution against teaching?
Passage: Rather than teach small parts of a large number of subjects, Whitehead advocated teaching a relatively few important concepts that the student could organically link to many different areas of knowledge, discovering their application in actual life. For Whitehead, education should be the exact opposite of the multidisciplinary, value-free school model – it should be transdisciplinary, and laden with values and general principles that provide students with a bedrock of wisdom and help them to make connections between areas of knowledge that are usually regarded as separate.

Question: What did Whitehead believe regarding the variety of subjects in education?

Question: How did Whitehead propose that students would expand their knowledge beyond the subjects taught in school?

Question: What was Whitehead's general opinion of what the school model should be?

Question: What was Whitehead's opinion on the inclusion of values and general principles in education?

Question: Whitehead's education style was to teach what?

Question: What should Whitehead's students organically link due to his teaching methods?

Question: Whitehead believed education should be the opposite of what?
Passage: Whitehead did not begin his career as a philosopher. In fact, he never had any formal training in philosophy beyond his undergraduate education. Early in his life he showed great interest in and respect for philosophy and metaphysics, but it is evident that he considered himself a rank amateur. In one letter to his friend and former student Bertrand Russell, after discussing whether science aimed to be explanatory or merely descriptive, he wrote: "This further question lands us in the ocean of metaphysic, onto which my profound ignorance of that science forbids me to enter." Ironically, in later life Whitehead would become one of the 20th century's foremost metaphysicians.

Question: What was the extent of Whitehead's education in philosophy?

Question: What was Whitehead's opinion of his own knowledge of metaphysics in that correspondence?

Question: How did Whitehead eventually become regarded in the field of metaphysics?

Question: With what friend and former student did Whitehead correspond regarding the goals of science?

Question: What is the highest Whitehead was trained in philosophy?

Question: What is the relationship between Whitehead and Russell?

Question: What did Whitehead consider himself as a philosopher?

Question: What was Whitehead considered as a metaphysician?
Passage: Whitehead was unimpressed by this objection. In the notes of one his students for a 1927 class, Whitehead was quoted as saying: "Every scientific man in order to preserve his reputation has to say he dislikes metaphysics. What he means is he dislikes having his metaphysics criticized." In Whitehead's view, scientists and philosophers make metaphysical assumptions about how the universe works all the time, but such assumptions are not easily seen precisely because they remain unexamined and unquestioned. While Whitehead acknowledged that "philosophers can never hope finally to formulate these metaphysical first principles," he argued that people need to continually re-imagine their basic assumptions about how the universe works if philosophy and science are to make any real progress, even if that progress remains permanently asymptotic. For this reason Whitehead regarded metaphysical investigations as essential to both good science and good philosophy.

Question: What quotation of Whitehead's was noted by a student in 1927?

Question: What was Whitehead's opinion of basic assumptions in metaphysics?

Question: What did Whitehead feel was necessary regarding basic assumptions in metaphysics?

Question: What was Whitehead's opinion of metaphysical investigations?

Question: What do philosophers do, in Whitehead's view?

Question: Assumptions of how the universe works are difficult to see precisely because of what?

Question: What did Whitehead ask people to reimagine in order for philosophy to make progress?

Question: What did Whitehead regard as essential to good science and good philosophy?
Passage: Perhaps foremost among what Whitehead considered faulty metaphysical assumptions was the Cartesian idea that reality is fundamentally constructed of bits of matter that exist totally independently of one another, which he rejected in favor of an event-based or "process" ontology in which events are primary and are fundamentally interrelated and dependent on one another. He also argued that the most basic elements of reality can all be regarded as experiential, indeed that everything is constituted by its experience. He used the term "experience" very broadly, so that even inanimate processes such as electron collisions are said to manifest some degree of experience. In this, he went against Descartes' separation of two different kinds of real existence, either exclusively material or else exclusively mental. Whitehead referred to his metaphysical system as "philosophy of organism", but it would become known more widely as "process philosophy."

Question: What Cartesian concept did Whitehead believe to be erroneous?

Question: What theory did Whitehead prefer to the Cartesian concept?

Question: How did whitehead define "experience"?

Question: How did Descartes' distinguish types of existence?

Question: How did Whitehead identify his system of metaphysics?

Question: What idea states that reality is fundamentally constructed of bits of matter?

Question: Whitehead rejected the Cartesian idea in favor of what?

Question: Whitehead believed instead of matter existing independently of each other, it did what?

Question: Whitehead believed that reality should be regarded as what?

Question: Whitehead's system as "philosophy of organism" became widely known as what term?
Passage: In Whitehead's view, then, concepts such as "quality", "matter", and "form" are problematic. These "classical" concepts fail to adequately account for change, and overlook the active and experiential nature of the most basic elements of the world. They are useful abstractions, but are not the world's basic building blocks. What is ordinarily conceived of as a single person, for instance, is philosophically described as a continuum of overlapping events. After all, people change all the time, if only because they have aged by another second and had some further experience. These occasions of experience are logically distinct, but are progressively connected in what Whitehead calls a "society" of events. By assuming that enduring objects are the most real and fundamental things in the universe, materialists have mistaken the abstract for the concrete (what Whitehead calls the "fallacy of misplaced concreteness").

Question: How did Whitehead define the "fallacy of misplaced concreteness"?

Question: What basic concepts did Whitehead believe were questionable?

Question: Why did he believe those concepts were inaccurate?

Question: How did Whitehead classify what is usually seen as an individual person?

Question: How did Whitehead refer to the combination of a person's separate experiences?

Question: What are the concepts quality, matter, and form considered?

Question: Concepts such as quality, matter, and form fail to account for what?

Question: What concepts overlook the experiential nature of basic elements?

Question: What does Whitehead call experiences that are progressively connected?

Question: Instead of being a single person, what does Whitehead view a person as?
Passage: To put it another way, a thing or person is often seen as having a "defining essence" or a "core identity" that is unchanging, and describes what the thing or person really is. In this way of thinking, things and people are seen as fundamentally the same through time, with any changes being qualitative and secondary to their core identity (e.g. "Mark's hair has turned gray as he has gotten older, but he is still the same person"). But in Whitehead's cosmology, the only fundamentally existent things are discrete "occasions of experience" that overlap one another in time and space, and jointly make up the enduring person or thing. On the other hand, what ordinary thinking often regards as "the essence of a thing" or "the identity/core of a person" is an abstract generalization of what is regarded as that person or thing's most important or salient features across time. Identities do not define people, people define identities. Everything changes from moment to moment, and to think of anything as having an "enduring essence" misses the fact that "all things flow", though it is often a useful way of speaking.

Question: What did Whitehead believe were essentially the only things that truly exist?

Question: Regarding the idea that individuals or objects don't fundamentally change, what terms can be used to describe what an object or individual actually is?

Question: In that line of thinking, how are changes described?

Question: The idea that people are unchanging and stay the same even through changes is considered what?

Question: In Whitehead's cosmology, what are the only things that fundamentally exist?

Question: Where do occasions of experience overlap?

Question: Instead of having an enduring essence, what does Whitehead believe?

Question: In Whitehead's view, identities do not define people, but what?