Because the document contained promises and guarantees only by one party, Lithuanian historian Jūratė Kiaupienė concluded that the union could not have been a final international treaty and that there should have been another document finalizing the agreement.
因为这份文件仅包括立陶宛单方做出的承诺与确认，立陶宛历史学家尤拉特·基奥皮埃内认为这次联合不应该仅是一份最终的国际条约，还应该存在另一份文件将这份协议定案。