As a philosopher, if I were speaking to a purely philosophic audience I should say that I ought to describe myself as an Agnostic, because I do not think that there is a conclusive argument by which one prove (sic) that there is not a God.
Aš, kaip filosofas, jei kalbėčiau išimtinai su filosofija susijusiai auditorijai, sakyčiau, jog man derėtų save apibūdinti kaip agnostiką, nes nemanau, kad yra nepaneigiamas įrodymas, jog Dievas neegzistuoja.