While judges cautiously accepted the judgment, some legal academics argued that it violated rules of evidence, damaged the separation of powers between the executive and Parliament and caused additional expense in cases.
Sementara para hakim dengan hati-hati menerima keputusan ini, beberapa akademisi hukum menyatakan bahwa keputusan ini melanggar peraturan mengenai bukti, merusak pemisahan kekuasaan antara eksekutif dan parlemen, serta manambah biaya dalam penyelesaian kasus.