In particular, he felt that the two separate addresses were incongruous and suggested that the first address, occurring before the preamble, may have been inserted by someone familiar with Bede to echo Eadbald's future conversion (see below).
En concreto, cría que os dous discursos separados eran incongruentes, e suxeriu que o primeiro, que aparecía antes do preámbulo, podería ser introducido por alguén próximo a Beda para dar conta da futura conversión de Eadbald.