On 22 October 2009, the Constitutional Court ruled that a man whose employer had given him and his registered partner inferior pension benefits on account of him not being married was entitled to the same benefits he would receive were he and his partner married and of opposite sexes.
في 22 أكتوبر/تشرين الأول 2009، حكمت المحكمة الدستورية بأن الرجل الذي أعطاه صاحب العمل وشريكه المسجل استحقاقات معاش أدنى بسبب عدم زواجه كان له الحق في الحصول على نفس المزايا التي كان سيحصل عليها إذا كان هو وشريكه متزوجين ومغايرين.