iflow-mcp_dicklesworthstone_mcp-agent-mail 0.2.1
Coordinated multi-agent messaging and coordination MCP server.
License: MIT
Requires Python: >=3.13

# MCP Agent Mail

![Agent Mail Showcase](screenshots/output/agent_mail_showcase.gif)

> "It's like gmail for your coding agents!"

A mail-like coordination layer for coding agents, exposed as an HTTP-only FastMCP server. It gives agents memorable identities, an inbox/outbox, searchable message history, and voluntary file reservation "leases" to avoid stepping on each other.

Think of it as asynchronous email + directory + change-intent signaling for your agents, backed by Git (for human-auditable artifacts) and SQLite (for indexing and queries).

Status: Under active development. The design is captured in detail in `project_idea_and_guide.md` (start with the original prompt at the top of that file).

## Why this exists

Modern projects often run multiple coding agents at once (backend, frontend, scripts, infra). Without a shared coordination fabric, agents:

- Overwrite each other's edits or panic on unexpected diffs
- Miss critical context from parallel workstreams
- Require humans to "liaison" messages across tools and teams

This project provides a lightweight, interoperable layer so agents can:

- Register a temporary-but-persistent identity (e.g., GreenCastle)
- Send/receive GitHub-Flavored Markdown messages with images
- Search, summarize, and thread conversations
- Declare advisory file reservations (leases) on files/globs to signal intent
- Inspect a directory of active agents, programs/models, and activity

It's designed for: FastMCP clients and CLI tools (Claude Code, Codex, Gemini CLI, etc.) coordinating across one or more codebases.

## From Idea Spark to Shipping Swarm

If a blank repo feels daunting, follow the field-tested workflow we documented in `project_idea_and_guide.md` (“Appendix: From Blank Repo to Coordinated Swarm”):

- **Ideate fast:** Write a scrappy email-style blurb about the problem, desired UX, and any must-have stack picks (≈15 minutes).
- **Promote it to a plan:** Feed that blurb to GPT-5 Pro (and optionally Grok4 Heavy / Opus 4.1) until you get a granular Markdown plan, then iterate on the plan file while it’s still cheap to change. The Markdown Web Browser sample plan shows the level of detail to aim for.
- **Codify the rules:** Clone a tuned `AGENTS.md`, add any tech-specific best-practice guides, and let Codex scaffold the repo plus Beads tasks straight from the plan.
- **Spin up the swarm:** Launch multiple Codex panes (or any agent mix), register each identity with Agent Mail, and have them acknowledge `AGENTS.md`, the plan document, and the Beads backlog before touching code.
- **Keep everyone fed:** Reuse the canned instruction cadence from the tweet thread or, better yet, let the commercial Companion app’s Message Stacks broadcast those prompts automatically so you never hand-feed panes again.

Watch the full 23-minute walkthrough (https://youtu.be/68VVcqMEDrs?si=pCm6AiJAndtZ6u7q) to see the loop in action.

## Productivity Math & Automation Loop

One disciplined hour of GPT-5 Codex—when it isn’t waiting on human prompts—often produces 10–20 “human hours” of work because the agents reason and type at machine speed. Agent Mail multiplies that advantage in two layers:

1. **Base OSS server:** Git-backed mailboxes, advisory file reservations, Typer CLI helpers, and searchable archives keep independent agents aligned without babysitting. Every instruction, lease, and attachment is auditable.
2. **Companion stack (commercial):** The iOS app + host automation can provision, pair, and steer heterogeneous fleets (Claude Code, Codex, Gemini CLI, etc.) from your phone using customizable Message Stacks, Human Overseer broadcasts, Beads awareness, and plan editing tools—no manual tmux choreography required. The automation closes the loop by scheduling prompts, honoring Limited Mode, and enforcing Double-Arm confirmations for destructive work.

Result: you invest 1–2 hours of human supervision, but dozens of agent-hours execute in parallel with clear audit trails and conflict-avoidance baked in.

## TLDR Quickstart

### One-line installer

```bash
curl -fsSL "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Dicklesworthstone/mcp_agent_mail/main/scripts/install.sh?$(date +%s)" | bash -s -- --yes
```

What this does:

- Installs uv if missing and updates your PATH for this session
- Installs jq if missing (needed for safe config merging; auto-detects your package manager)
- Creates a Python 3.14 virtual environment and installs dependencies with uv
- Runs the auto-detect integration to wire up supported agent tools
- Starts the MCP HTTP server on port 8765 and prints a masked bearer token
- Creates helper scripts under `scripts/` (including `run_server_with_token.sh`)
- Adds an `am` shell alias to your `.zshrc` or `.bashrc` for quick server startup (just type `am` in a new terminal!)
- Installs/updates, verifies, and wires the Beads `bd` CLI into your PATH via its official curl installer so the task planner is ready out of the box (pass `--skip-beads` to opt out or install manually)
- Installs/updates the Beads Viewer `bv` TUI for interactive task browsing and AI-friendly robot commands (pass `--skip-bv` to opt out)
- Prints a short on-exit summary of each setup step so you immediately know what changed

Prefer a specific location or options? Add flags like `--dir <path>`, `--project-dir <path>`, `--no-start`, `--start-only`, `--port <number>`, or `--token <hex>`.

Already have Beads or Beads Viewer installed? Append `--skip-beads` and/or `--skip-bv` to bypass automatic installation.

### Starting the server in the future

After installation, you can start the MCP Agent Mail server from **anywhere** by simply typing:

```bash
am
```

That's it! The `am` alias (added to your `.zshrc` or `.bashrc` during installation) automatically:
1. Changes to the MCP Agent Mail directory
2. Runs the server startup script (which uses `uv run` to handle the virtual environment)
3. Loads your saved bearer token from `.env` and starts the HTTP server

**Note:** If you just ran the installer, open a new terminal or run `source ~/.zshrc` (or `source ~/.bashrc`) to load the alias.

**Port conflicts?** Use `--port` to specify a different port (default: 8765):

```bash
# Install with custom port
curl -fsSL "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Dicklesworthstone/mcp_agent_mail/main/scripts/install.sh?$(date +%s)" | bash -s -- --port 9000 --yes

# Or use the CLI command after installation
uv run python -m mcp_agent_mail.cli config set-port 9000
```

### If you want to do it yourself

Clone the repo, set up and install with uv in a python 3.14 venv (install uv if you don't have it already), and then run `scripts/automatically_detect_all_installed_coding_agents_and_install_mcp_agent_mail_in_all.sh`. This will automatically set things up for your various installed coding agent tools and start the MCP server on port 8765. If you want to run the MCP server again in the future, simply run `scripts/run_server_with_token.sh`:

```bash
# Install uv (if you don't have it already)
curl -LsSf https://astral.sh/uv/install.sh | sh
export PATH="$HOME/.local/bin:$PATH"

# Clone the repo
git clone https://github.com/Dicklesworthstone/mcp_agent_mail
cd mcp_agent_mail

# Create a Python 3.14 virtual environment and install dependencies
uv python install 3.14
uv venv -p 3.14
source .venv/bin/activate
uv sync

# Detect installed coding agents, integrate, and start the MCP server on port 8765
scripts/automatically_detect_all_installed_coding_agents_and_install_mcp_agent_mail_in_all.sh

# Later, to run the MCP server again with the same token
scripts/run_server_with_token.sh

# Now, simply launch Codex-CLI or Claude Code or other agent tools in other consoles; they should have the mail tool available. See below for a ready-made chunk of text you can add to the end of your existing AGENTS.md or CLAUDE.md files to help your agents better utilize the new tools.

# Change port after installation
uv run python -m mcp_agent_mail.cli config set-port 9000
```

## Ready-Made Blurb to Add to Your AGENTS.md or CLAUDE.md Files:
<!-- BEGIN_AGENT_MAIL_SNIPPET -->
```
## MCP Agent Mail: coordination for multi-agent workflows

What it is
- A mail-like layer that lets coding agents coordinate asynchronously via MCP tools and resources.
- Provides identities, inbox/outbox, searchable threads, and advisory file reservations, with human-auditable artifacts in Git.

Why it's useful
- Prevents agents from stepping on each other with explicit file reservations (leases) for files/globs.
- Keeps communication out of your token budget by storing messages in a per-project archive.
- Offers quick reads (`resource://inbox/...`, `resource://thread/...`) and macros that bundle common flows.

How to use effectively
1) Same repository
   - Register an identity: call `ensure_project`, then `register_agent` using this repo's absolute path as `project_key`.
   - Reserve files before you edit: `file_reservation_paths(project_key, agent_name, ["src/**"], ttl_seconds=3600, exclusive=true)` to signal intent and avoid conflict.
   - Communicate with threads: use `send_message(..., thread_id="FEAT-123")`; check inbox with `fetch_inbox` and acknowledge with `acknowledge_message`.
   - Read fast: `resource://inbox/{Agent}?project=<abs-path>&limit=20` or `resource://thread/{id}?project=<abs-path>&include_bodies=true`.
   - Tip: set `AGENT_NAME` in your environment so the pre-commit guard can block commits that conflict with others' active exclusive file reservations.

2) Across different repos in one project (e.g., Next.js frontend + FastAPI backend)
   - Option A (single project bus): register both sides under the same `project_key` (shared key/path). Keep reservation patterns specific (e.g., `frontend/**` vs `backend/**`).
   - Option B (separate projects): each repo has its own `project_key`; use `macro_contact_handshake` or `request_contact`/`respond_contact` to link agents, then message directly. Keep a shared `thread_id` (e.g., ticket key) across repos for clean summaries/audits.

Macros vs granular tools
- Prefer macros when you want speed or are on a smaller model: `macro_start_session`, `macro_prepare_thread`, `macro_file_reservation_cycle`, `macro_contact_handshake`.
- Use granular tools when you need control: `register_agent`, `file_reservation_paths`, `send_message`, `fetch_inbox`, `acknowledge_message`.

Common pitfalls
- "from_agent not registered": always `register_agent` in the correct `project_key` first.
- "FILE_RESERVATION_CONFLICT": adjust patterns, wait for expiry, or use a non-exclusive reservation when appropriate.
- Auth errors: if JWT+JWKS is enabled, include a bearer token with a `kid` that matches server JWKS; static bearer is used only when JWT is disabled.
```
<!-- END_AGENT_MAIL_SNIPPET -->

## Integrating with Beads (dependency-aware task planning)

Beads is a lightweight task planner (`bd` CLI) that complements Agent Mail by keeping status and dependencies in one place while Mail handles messaging, file reservations, and audit trails. Project: [steveyegge/beads](https://github.com/steveyegge/beads)

Highlights:
- Beads owns task prioritization; Agent Mail carries the conversations and artifacts.
- Shared identifiers (e.g., `bd-123`) keep Beads issues, Mail threads, and commits aligned.
- Install the `bd` CLI via prebuilt release or Go build; see the repository for platform specifics.

Copy/paste blurb for agent-facing docs (leave as-is for reuse):

<!-- BEGIN_BEADS_SNIPPET -->
```

## Integrating with Beads (dependency-aware task planning)

Beads provides a lightweight, dependency-aware issue database and a CLI (`bd`) for selecting "ready work," setting priorities, and tracking status. It complements MCP Agent Mail's messaging, audit trail, and file-reservation signals. Project: [steveyegge/beads](https://github.com/steveyegge/beads)

Recommended conventions
- **Single source of truth**: Use **Beads** for task status/priority/dependencies; use **Agent Mail** for conversation, decisions, and attachments (audit).
- **Shared identifiers**: Use the Beads issue id (e.g., `bd-123`) as the Mail `thread_id` and prefix message subjects with `[bd-123]`.
- **Reservations**: When starting a `bd-###` task, call `file_reservation_paths(...)` for the affected paths; include the issue id in the `reason` and release on completion.

Typical flow (agents)
1) **Pick ready work** (Beads)
   - `bd ready --json` → choose one item (highest priority, no blockers)
2) **Reserve edit surface** (Mail)
   - `file_reservation_paths(project_key, agent_name, ["src/**"], ttl_seconds=3600, exclusive=true, reason="bd-123")`
3) **Announce start** (Mail)
   - `send_message(..., thread_id="bd-123", subject="[bd-123] Start: <short title>", ack_required=true)`
4) **Work and update**
   - Reply in-thread with progress and attach artifacts/images; keep the discussion in one thread per issue id
5) **Complete and release**
   - `bd close bd-123 --reason "Completed"` (Beads is status authority)
   - `release_file_reservations(project_key, agent_name, paths=["src/**"])`
   - Final Mail reply: `[bd-123] Completed` with summary and links

Mapping cheat-sheet
- **Mail `thread_id`** ↔ `bd-###`
- **Mail subject**: `[bd-###] …`
- **File reservation `reason`**: `bd-###`
- **Commit messages (optional)**: include `bd-###` for traceability

Event mirroring (optional automation)
- On `bd update --status blocked`, send a high-importance Mail message in thread `bd-###` describing the blocker.
- On Mail "ACK overdue" for a critical decision, add a Beads label (e.g., `needs-ack`) or bump priority to surface it in `bd ready`.

Pitfalls to avoid
- Don't create or manage tasks in Mail; treat Beads as the single task queue.
- Always include `bd-###` in message `thread_id` to avoid ID drift across tools.

```
<!-- END_BEADS_SNIPPET -->

Prefer automation? Run `uv run python -m mcp_agent_mail.cli docs insert-blurbs` to scan your code directories for `AGENTS.md`/`CLAUDE.md` files and append the latest Agent Mail + Beads snippets with per-project confirmation. The installer also offers to launch this helper right after setup so you can take care of onboarding docs immediately.

## Beads Viewer (bv) — AI-Friendly Task Analysis

The Beads Viewer (`bv`) is a fast terminal UI for Beads projects that also provides **robot flags** designed specifically for AI agent integration. Project: [Dicklesworthstone/beads_viewer](https://github.com/Dicklesworthstone/beads_viewer)

### Why bv for Agents?

While `bd` (Beads CLI) handles task CRUD operations, `bv` provides **precomputed graph analytics** that help agents make intelligent prioritization decisions:

- **PageRank scores**: Identify high-impact tasks that unblock the most downstream work
- **Critical path analysis**: Find the longest dependency chain to completion
- **Cycle detection**: Spot circular dependencies before they cause deadlocks
- **Parallel track planning**: Determine which tasks can run concurrently

Instead of agents parsing `.beads/beads.jsonl` directly or attempting to compute graph metrics (risking hallucinated results), they can call bv's deterministic robot flags and get JSON output they can trust.

### Robot Flags for AI Integration

| Flag | Output | Agent Use Case |
|------|--------|----------------|
| `bv --robot-help` | All AI-facing commands | Discovery / capability check |
| `bv --robot-insights` | PageRank, betweenness, HITS, critical path, cycles | Quick triage: "What's most impactful?" |
| `bv --robot-plan` | Parallel tracks, items per track, unblocks lists | Execution planning: "What can run in parallel?" |
| `bv --robot-priority` | Priority recommendations with reasoning + confidence | Task selection: "What should I work on next?" |
| `bv --robot-recipes` | Available filter presets (actionable, blocked, etc.) | Workflow setup: "Show me ready work" |
| `bv --robot-diff --diff-since <ref>` | Changes since commit/date, new/closed items, cycles | Progress tracking: "What changed?" |

### Example: Agent Task Selection Workflow

```bash
# 1. Get priority recommendations with reasoning
bv --robot-priority
# Returns JSON with ranked tasks, impact scores, and confidence levels

# 2. Check what completing a task would unblock
bv --robot-plan
# Returns parallel tracks showing dependency chains

# 3. After completing work, check what changed
bv --robot-diff --diff-since "1 hour ago"
# Returns new items, closed items, cycle changes
```

### When to Use bv vs bd

| Tool | Best For |
|------|----------|
| `bd` | Creating, updating, closing tasks; `bd ready` for simple "what's next" |
| `bv` | Graph analysis, impact assessment, parallel planning, change tracking |

**Rule of thumb**: Use `bd` for task operations, use `bv` for task intelligence.

### Integration with Agent Mail

Combine bv insights with Agent Mail coordination:

1. **Agent A** runs `bv --robot-priority` → identifies `bd-42` as highest-impact
2. **Agent A** reserves files: `file_reservation_paths(..., reason="bd-42")`
3. **Agent A** announces: `send_message(..., thread_id="bd-42", subject="[bd-42] Starting high-impact refactor")`
4. **Other agents** see the reservation and Mail announcement, pick different tasks
5. **Agent A** completes, runs `bv --robot-diff` to report downstream unblocks

This creates a feedback loop where graph intelligence drives coordination.

## Core ideas (at a glance)

- HTTP-only FastMCP server (Streamable HTTP). No SSE, no STDIO.
- Dual persistence model:
  - Human-readable markdown in a per-project Git repo for every canonical message and per-recipient inbox/outbox copy
  - SQLite with FTS5 for fast search, directory queries, and file reservations/leases
- "Directory/LDAP" style queries for agents; memorable adjective+noun names
- Advisory file reservations for editing surfaces; optional pre-commit guard
- Resource layer for convenient reads (e.g., `resource://inbox/{agent}`)

## Typical use cases

- Multiple agents splitting a large refactor across services while staying in sync
- Frontend and backend teams of agents coordinating thread-by-thread
- Protecting critical migrations with exclusive file reservations and a pre-commit guard
- Searching and summarizing long technical discussions as threads evolve
- Discovering and linking related projects (e.g., frontend/backend) through AI-powered suggestions

## Workflow FAQ

**Do I still need the tmux broadcast script to “feed” every Codex pane?**

No. The historical zsh loop from the tweet thread is still handy if you are running the OSS stack by itself, but the AgentMail Companion system now automates that cadence with Message Stacks. Once the companion host services are installed, you queue presets (builder loop, reviewer sweep, test focus, etc.) from the iOS app or CLI and the automation fans those instructions out to every enrolled agent—without touching tmux.

## Architecture

```mermaid
graph LR
  A[Agents]
  S[Server]
  G[Git repo]
  Q[SQLite FTS5]

  A -->|HTTP tools/resources| S
  S -->|writes/reads| G
  S -->|indexes/queries| Q

  subgraph GitTree["Git tree"]
    GI1[agents/profile.json]
    GI2[agents/mailboxes/...]
    GI3[messages/YYYY/\nMM/\nid.md]
    GI4[file_reservations/\nsha1.json]
    GA[attachments/xx/\nsha1.webp]
  end

  G --- GI1
  G --- GI2
  G --- GI3
  G --- GI4
  G --- GA
```

## Web UI (human-facing mail viewer)

The server ships a lightweight, server-rendered Web UI for humans. It lets you browse projects, agents, inboxes, single messages, attachments, file reservations, and perform full-text search with FTS5 when available (with an automatic LIKE fallback).

- Where it lives: built into the HTTP server in `mcp_agent_mail.http` under the `/mail` path.
- Who it's for: humans reviewing activity; agents should continue to use the MCP tools/resources API.

### Launching the Web UI

Recommended (simple):

```bash
scripts/run_server_with_token.sh
# then open http://127.0.0.1:8765/mail
```

Advanced (manual commands):

```bash
uv run python -m mcp_agent_mail.http --host 127.0.0.1 --port 8765
# or:
uv run uvicorn mcp_agent_mail.http:build_http_app --factory --host 127.0.0.1 --port 8765
```

Auth notes:
- GET pages in the UI are not gated by the RBAC middleware (it classifies POSTed MCP calls only), but if you set a bearer token the separate BearerAuth middleware protects all routes by default.
- For local dev, set `HTTP_ALLOW_LOCALHOST_UNAUTHENTICATED=true` (and optionally `HTTP_BEARER_TOKEN`), so localhost can load the UI without headers.
- Health endpoints are always open at `/health/*`.

### Routes and what you can do

- `/mail` (Unified inbox + Projects + Related Projects Discovery)
  - Shows a unified, reverse-chronological inbox of recent messages across all projects with excerpts, relative timestamps, sender/recipients, and project badges.
  - Below the inbox, lists all projects (slug, human name, created time) with sibling suggestions.
  - Suggests **likely sibling projects** when two slugs appear to be parts of the same product (e.g., backend vs. frontend). Suggestions are ranked with heuristics and, when `LLM_ENABLED=true`, an LLM pass across key docs (`README.md`, `AGENTS.md`, etc.).
  - Humans can **Confirm Link** or **Dismiss** suggestions from the dashboard. Confirmed siblings become highlighted badges but *do not* automatically authorize cross-project messaging; agents must still establish `AgentLink` approvals via `request_contact`/`respond_contact`.

- `/mail/projects` (Projects index)
  - Dedicated projects list view; click a project to drill in.

- `/mail/{project}` (Project overview + search + agents)
  - Rich search form with filters:
    - Scope: subject/body/both, Order: relevance or time, optional "boost subject".
    - Query tokens: supports `subject:foo`, `body:"multi word"`, quoted phrases, and bare terms.
    - Uses FTS5 bm25 scoring when available; otherwise falls back to SQL LIKE on subject/body with your chosen scope.
  - Results show subject, sender, created time, thread id, and a highlighted snippet when using FTS.
  - Agents panel shows registered agents for the project with a link to each inbox.
  - Quick links to File Reservations and Attachments for the project header.

- `/mail/{project}/inbox/{agent}` (Inbox for one agent)
  - Reverse-chronological list with subject, sender, created time, importance badge, thread id.
  - Pagination (`?page=N&limit=M`).

- `/mail/{project}/message/{id}` (Message detail)
  - Shows subject, sender, created time, importance, recipients (To/Cc/Bcc), thread messages.
  - Body rendering:
    - If the server pre-converted markdown to HTML, it's sanitized with Bleach (limited tags/attributes, safe CSS via CSSSanitizer) and then displayed.
    - Otherwise markdown is rendered client-side with Marked + Prism for code highlighting.
  - Attachments are referenced from the message frontmatter (WebP files or inline data URIs).

- `/mail/{project}/search?q=...` (Dedicated search page)
  - Same query syntax as the project overview search, with a token "pill" UI for assembling/removing filters.

- `/mail/{project}/file_reservations` (File Reservations list)
  - Displays active and historical file reservations (exclusive/shared, path pattern, timestamps, released/expired state).

- `/mail/{project}/attachments` (Messages with attachments)
  - Lists messages that contain any attachments, with subject and created time.
  
- `/mail/unified-inbox` (Cross-project activity)
  - Shows recent messages across all projects with thread counts and sender/recipients.

### Human Overseer: Sending Messages to Agents

Sometimes a human operator needs to guide or redirect agents directly, whether to handle an urgent issue, provide clarification, or adjust priorities. The **Human Overseer** feature provides a web-based message composer that lets humans send high-priority messages to any combination of agents in a project.

**Access:** Click the prominent **"Send Message"** button (with the Overseer badge) in the header of any project view (`/mail/{project}`), or navigate directly to `/mail/{project}/overseer/compose`.

#### What Makes Overseer Messages Special

1. **Automatic Preamble**: Every message includes a formatted preamble that clearly identifies it as coming from a human operator and instructs agents to:
   - **Pause current work** temporarily
   - **Prioritize the human's request** over existing tasks
   - **Resume original plans** afterward (unless modified by the instructions)

2. **High Priority**: All overseer messages are automatically marked as **high importance**, ensuring they stand out in agent inboxes.

3. **Policy Bypass**: Overseer messages bypass normal contact policies, so humans can always reach any agent regardless of their contact settings.

4. **Special Sender Identity**: Messages come from a special agent named **"HumanOverseer"** (automatically created per project) with:
   - Program: `WebUI`
   - Model: `Human`
   - Contact Policy: `open`

#### The Message Preamble

Every overseer message begins with this preamble (automatically prepended):

```
---

🚨 MESSAGE FROM HUMAN OVERSEER 🚨

This message is from a human operator overseeing this project. Please prioritize
the instructions below over your current tasks.

You should:
1. Temporarily pause your current work
2. Complete the request described below
3. Resume your original plans afterward (unless modified by these instructions)

The human's guidance supersedes all other priorities.

---

[Your message body follows here]
```

#### Using the Composer

The composer interface provides:

- **Recipient Selection**: Checkbox grid of all registered agents (with "Select All" / "Clear" shortcuts)
- **Subject Line**: Required, shown in agent inboxes
- **Message Body**: GitHub-flavored Markdown editor with preview
- **Thread ID** (optional): Continue an existing conversation or start a new one
- **Preamble Preview**: See exactly how your message will appear to agents

#### Example Use Cases

**Urgent Issue:**
```
Subject: Urgent: Stop migration and revert changes

The database migration in PR #453 is causing data corruption in staging.

Please:
1. Immediately stop any migration-related work
2. Revert commits from the last 2 hours
3. Wait for my review before resuming

I'm investigating the root cause now.
```

**Priority Adjustment:**
```
Subject: New Priority: Security Vulnerability

A critical security vulnerability was just disclosed in our auth library.

Drop your current tasks and:
1. Update `auth-lib` to version 2.4.1 immediately
2. Review all usages in src/auth/
3. Run the full security test suite
4. Report status in thread #892

This takes precedence over the refactoring work.
```

**Clarification:**
```
Subject: Clarification on API design approach

I see you're debating REST vs. GraphQL in thread #234.

Go with REST for now because:
- Our frontend team has more REST experience
- GraphQL adds complexity we don't need yet
- We can always add GraphQL later if needed

Resume the API implementation with REST.
```

#### How Agents See Overseer Messages

When agents check their inbox (via `fetch_inbox` or `resource://inbox/{name}`), overseer messages appear like any other message but with:

- **Sender**: `HumanOverseer`
- **Importance**: `high` (displayed prominently)
- **Body**: Starts with the overseer preamble, followed by the human's message
- **Visual cues**: In the Web UI, these messages may have special highlighting (future enhancement)

Agents can reply to overseer messages just like any other message, continuing the conversation thread.

#### Technical Details

- **Storage**: Overseer messages are stored identically to agent-to-agent messages (Git + SQLite)
- **Git History**: Fully auditable; message appears in `messages/YYYY/MM/{id}.md` with commit history
- **Thread Continuity**: Can be part of existing threads or start new ones
- **No Authentication Bypass**: The overseer compose form still requires proper HTTP server authentication (if enabled)

#### Design Philosophy

The Human Overseer feature is designed to be:

- **Explicit**: Agents clearly know when guidance comes from a human vs. another agent
- **Respectful**: Instructions acknowledge agents have existing work and shouldn't just "drop everything" permanently
- **Temporary**: Agents are told to resume original plans once the human's request is complete
- **Flexible**: Humans can override this guidance directly in their message body

This creates a clear hierarchy (human → agents) while maintaining the collaborative, respectful tone of the agent communication system.

### Related Projects Discovery

The Projects index (`/mail`) features an **AI-powered discovery system** that intelligently suggests which projects should be linked together, such as frontend + backend or related microservices.

#### How Discovery Works

**1. Smart Analysis**
The system uses multiple signals to identify relationships:
- **Pattern matching**: Compares project names and paths (e.g., "my-app-frontend" ↔ "my-app-backend")
- **AI understanding** (when `LLM_ENABLED=true`): Reads `README.md`, `AGENTS.md`, and other docs to understand each project's purpose and detect natural relationships
- **Confidence scoring**: Ranks suggestions from 0-100% with clear rationales

**2. Beautiful Suggestions**
Related projects appear as polished cards on your dashboard with:
- 🎯 Visual confidence indicators showing match strength
- 💬 AI-generated rationales explaining the relationship
- ✅ **Confirm Link** - accept the suggestion
- ✖️ **Dismiss** - hide irrelevant matches

**3. Quick Navigation**
Once confirmed, both projects display interactive badges for instant navigation between related codebases.

#### Why Suggestions, Not Auto-Linking?

> **TL;DR**: We keep you in control. Discovery helps you find relationships; explicit approvals control who can actually communicate.

**Agent Mail uses agent-centric messaging**: every message follows explicit permission chains:

```
Send Message → Find Recipient → Check AgentLink Approval → Deliver
```

This design ensures:
- **Security**: No accidental cross-project message delivery
- **Transparency**: You always know who can talk to whom
- **Audit trails**: All communication paths are explicitly approved

**Why not auto-link with AI?**
If we let an LLM automatically authorize messaging between projects, we'd be:
- ❌ Bypassing contact policies without human oversight
- ❌ Risking message misdelivery to unintended recipients
- ❌ Creating invisible routing paths that are hard to audit
- ❌ Potentially linking ambiguously-named projects incorrectly

Instead, we give you **discovery + control**:
- ✅ AI suggests likely relationships (safe, read-only analysis)
- ✅ You confirm what makes sense (one click)
- ✅ Agents still use `request_contact` / `respond_contact` for actual messaging permissions
- ✅ Clear separation: discovery ≠ authorization

#### The Complete Workflow

```
1. System suggests: "These projects look related" (AI analysis)
           ↓
2. You confirm: "Yes, link them" (updates UI badges)
           ↓
3. Agents request: request_contact(from_agent, to_agent, to_project)
           ↓
4. You approve: respond_contact(accept=true)
           ↓
5. Messages flow: Agents can now communicate across projects
```

**Think of it like LinkedIn**: The system suggests connections, but only *you* decide who gets to send messages.

### Search syntax (UI)

The UI shares the same parsing as the API's `_parse_fts_query`:
- Field filters: `subject:login`, `body:"api key"`
- Phrase search: `"build plan"`
- Combine terms: `login AND security` (FTS)
- Fallback LIKE: scope determines whether subject, body, or both are searched

### Prerequisites to see data

The UI reads from the same SQLite + Git artifacts as the MCP tools. To populate content:
1) Ensure a project exists (via tool call or CLI):
   - Ensure/create project: `ensure_project(human_key)`
2) Register one or more agents: `register_agent(project_key, program, model, name?)`
3) Send messages: `send_message(...)` (attachments and inline images are supported; images may be converted to WebP).

Once messages exist, visit `/mail`, click your project, then open an agent inbox or search.

### Implementation and dependencies

- Templates live in `src/mcp_agent_mail/templates/` and are rendered by Jinja2.
- Markdown is converted with `markdown2` on the server where possible; HTML is sanitized with Bleach (with CSS sanitizer when available).
- Tailwind CSS, Lucide icons, Alpine.js, Marked, and Prism are loaded via CDN in `base.html` for a modern look without a frontend build step.
- All rendering is server-side; there's no SPA router. Pages degrade cleanly without JavaScript.

### Security considerations

- HTML sanitization: Only a conservative set of tags/attributes are allowed; CSS is filtered. Links are limited to http/https/mailto/data.
- Auth: Use bearer token or JWT when exposing beyond localhost. For local dev, enable localhost bypass as noted above.
- Rate limiting (optional): Token-bucket limiter can be enabled; UI GET requests are light and unaffected by POST limits.

### Troubleshooting the UI

- Blank page or 401 on localhost: Either unset `HTTP_BEARER_TOKEN` or set `HTTP_ALLOW_LOCALHOST_UNAUTHENTICATED=true`.
- No projects listed: Create one with `ensure_project`.
- Empty inbox: Verify recipient names match exactly and messages were sent to that agent.
- Search returns nothing: Try simpler terms or the LIKE fallback (toggle scope/body).

## Static Mailbox Export (Share & Distribute Archives)

The `share` command group exports a project’s mailbox into a portable, read‑only bundle that anyone can review in a browser. It’s designed for auditors, stakeholders, or teammates who need to browse threads, search history, or prove delivery timelines without spinning up the full MCP Agent Mail stack.

### Why export to static bundles?

**Compliance and audit trails**: Deliver immutable snapshots of project communication to auditors or compliance officers. The static bundle includes cryptographic signatures for tamper-evident distribution.

**Stakeholder review**: Share conversation history with product managers, executives, or external consultants who don't need write access. They can browse messages, search threads, and view attachments in their browser without authentication.

**Offline access**: Create portable archives for air-gapped environments, disaster recovery backups, or situations where internet connectivity is unreliable.

**Long-term archival**: Preserve project communication in a format that will remain readable decades from now. Static HTML requires no database server, no runtime dependencies, and survives software obsolescence better than proprietary formats.

**Secure distribution**: Encrypt bundles with age for confidential projects. Only recipients with the private key can decrypt and view the contents.

### What's included in an export

Each bundle contains:

- **Self-contained**: Everything ships in a single directory (HTML, CSS/JS, SQLite snapshot, attachments). Drop it on a static host or open it locally.
- **Rich reader UI**: Gmail-style inbox with project filters, search, and full-thread rendering—each message is shown with its metadata and Markdown body, just like in the live web UI.
- **Fast search & filters**: FTS-backed search and precomputed per-message summaries keep scrolling and filtering responsive even with large archives.
- **Verifiable integrity**: SHA-256 hashes for every asset plus optional Ed25519 signing make authenticity and tampering checks straightforward.
- **Chunk-friendly archives**: Large databases can be chunked for httpvfs streaming; a companion `chunks.sha256` file lists digests for each chunk so clients can trust streamed blobs without recomputing hashes.
- **One-click hosting**: The interactive wizard can publish straight to GitHub Pages or Cloudflare Pages, or you can serve the bundle locally with the CLI preview command.

## Disaster Recovery Archives (`archive` commands)

Use the `archive` subcommands when you need a *restorable* snapshot (not just a read-only share bundle). Each ZIP under `./archived_mailbox_states/` includes:

- A SQLite snapshot processed by the same cleanup pipeline as `share`, but using the `archive` scrub preset so ack/read state, recipients, attachments, and message bodies remain untouched.
- A byte-for-byte copy of the storage Git repo (`STORAGE_ROOT`), preserving markdown artifacts, attachments, and hook scripts.

### Quick ref

```bash
# Save current state (defaults to the lossless preset)
uv run python -m mcp_agent_mail.cli archive save --label nightly

# List available restore points (JSON is handy for scripts)
uv run python -m mcp_agent_mail.cli archive list --json

# Restore after a disaster (backs up any existing DB/storage before overwriting)
uv run python -m mcp_agent_mail.cli archive restore archived_mailbox_states/<file>.zip --force
```

During restore the CLI:

1. Extracts the ZIP into a temp directory.
2. Moves any existing `storage.sqlite3`, WAL/SHM siblings, and `STORAGE_ROOT` into timestamped `.backup-<ts>` folders so nothing is lost.
3. Copies the snapshot back to the configured database path and rebuilds the storage repo from the archive contents.

Every archive writes a `metadata.json` manifest describing the projects captured, scrub preset, and a friendly reminder of the exact `archive restore …` command to run later.

### Reset safety net

`clear-and-reset-everything` now offers to create one of these archives before deleting anything. By default it prompts interactively; pass `--archive/--no-archive` to force a choice, and pair with `--force --no-archive` for non-interactive automation. When an archive is created successfully, the CLI prints both the path and the restore command so you can undo the reset later.

## Mailbox Health: `am doctor`

The `doctor` command group provides comprehensive diagnostics and repair capabilities for maintaining mailbox health. It emphasizes **data safety**—creating backups before any destructive operation and using semi-automatic repair to prevent accidental data loss.

### Why `am doctor`?

Over time, mailbox state can drift:
- **Stale locks**: Process crashes leave behind `.archive.lock` or `.commit.lock` files that block operations
- **Orphaned records**: Agents get deleted but their message recipients remain in the database
- **FTS index desync**: Full-text search index falls out of sync with actual messages
- **Expired file reservations**: Reservations expire but aren't cleaned up
- **WAL files**: SQLite WAL/SHM files accumulate (normal during operation, but worth monitoring)

The doctor commands detect these issues and offer safe, automatic repair.

### Diagnostic checks

Run comprehensive diagnostics on your mailbox:

```bash
# Check all projects
uv run python -m mcp_agent_mail.cli doctor check

# Check with verbose output
uv run python -m mcp_agent_mail.cli doctor check --verbose

# JSON output for automation
uv run python -m mcp_agent_mail.cli doctor check --json
```

**What it checks:**

| Check | Status | Description |
|-------|--------|-------------|
| Locks | OK/WARN | Detects stale archive and commit locks from crashed processes |
| Database | OK/ERROR | Runs `PRAGMA integrity_check` for SQLite corruption |
| Orphaned Records | OK/WARN | Finds message recipients without corresponding agents |
| FTS Index | OK/WARN | Compares message count vs FTS index entries |
| File Reservations | OK/INFO | Counts expired reservations pending cleanup |
| WAL Files | OK/INFO | Reports presence of SQLite WAL/SHM files |

**Example output:**

```
MCP Agent Mail Doctor - Diagnostic Report
==================================================

Check         Status    Details
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Locks         OK        No stale locks found
Database      OK