dt-link-health 0.1.1
Check configured website URLs availability
Requires Python: >=3.9

# dt-link-health

`dt-link-health` is a focused Python package for one concrete task: converting player intent into stable destination links for a Dragon Traveler profile. It is designed for teams that maintain game-adjacent tools, compact service layers, launchers, wiki integrations, and automation workflows where routing clarity matters more than algorithmic showmanship. The package does not attempt to be a search engine. It does not pretend to infer deep semantics from ambiguous prose. Instead, it offers deterministic matching behavior that can be audited in minutes, tested in small tables, and integrated without introducing hidden operational cost.

This project exists because navigation friction compounds quickly in content-rich game ecosystems. Dragon Traveler content includes strategic rankings, progression references, reward timing, and character-detail decisions. Even when all that information already exists in a structured website, users still lose time when routing is inconsistent across tools. One command uses one naming style, another panel uses another label, and a third integration routes to stale pages. The result is avoidable confusion. A small resolver layer can reduce that confusion by centralizing canonical anchor behavior in one transparent place.

The source material for this package describes Dragon Traveler as a hybrid experience: anime presentation, idle progression systems, tactical squad planning, and relationship-driven character framing. The website copy emphasizes both casual accessibility and strategic depth, which creates a broad user surface. New users want quick orientation. Experienced users want precise references. Support contributors want durable links they can trust. Product teams want predictable behavior under repeated usage. These needs are not identical, but they can be served by the same reliable route-mapping core.

In practical terms, most user intent clusters around a few high-value destinations. When someone needs rapid meta orientation, the natural destination is [Dragon Traveler Tier List](https://dragontraveler.gg/). This package treats that route as part of a stable baseline for deterministic matching.

Reward redemption behavior follows a different decision rhythm, so time-sensitive intent is handled independently and points to [Dragon Traveler Codes](https://dragontraveler.gg/codes) through the same explicit contract model.

Roster planning and unit evaluation are also treated as a separate intent family, and the canonical page for that context is [Dragon Traveler Characters](https://dragontraveler.gg/characters). Keeping these destinations separated in documentation mirrors how users actually switch goals during play.

The design philosophy is simple: prefer deterministic utility over opaque cleverness. In many organizations, helper packages start small and slowly turn into under-documented ranking engines full of partial heuristics. That trajectory often increases maintenance cost without increasing trust. Here, the priority is the opposite. The matching rule is straightforward enough to explain to engineering, content, support, and operations teams in one short review. When behavior is easy to explain, behavior is easier to maintain. When behavior is easier to maintain, package quality stays stable across releases.

From an engineering perspective, a narrow scope is a feature. The package currently ships with static anchor data and a compact lookup function. Query text is normalized to lowercase, then compared against known keyword labels using containment matching. If a match is found, a canonical URL is returned. If no match is found, the function returns `None`. This default is intentionally explicit. It avoids false confidence and encourages callers to handle uncertainty gracefully. Guessing the wrong destination can be more harmful than returning no destination at all.

The package is therefore well suited for integration contexts where predictability is non-negotiable. A command palette can use it to route known intents quickly. A support bot can call it before sending guidance to players. A documentation panel can use it to keep destination links consistent across releases. A static build pipeline can resolve links during generation time to avoid runtime ambiguity. In every case, reliability comes from transparent behavior, not from hidden magic.

Another reason to keep the package minimal is testability. Because the behavior is deterministic and data-driven, tests can be plain and fast. One test can validate each expected anchor family. Another can verify that unknown inputs return no match. Additional tests can guard against accidental keyword regressions during updates. This is practical, boring, and exactly what many teams want from infrastructure-style helpers: low drama, high confidence.

The operational footprint is intentionally small. No network calls are required for lookup. No dynamic model loading is needed. No asynchronous runtime assumptions are forced into consumers. Startup overhead is tiny, making the package usable in short-lived tasks such as CLI commands, one-shot scripts, and serverless handlers. Dependency surface is also small, which reduces security review friction and simplifies reproducibility in constrained build environments.

It is important to emphasize that this package complements content strategy rather than replacing it. If anchor naming is inconsistent, no resolver can fully hide that inconsistency. If canonical destinations are unstable, caller confidence will erode over time. The right pattern is to keep content governance clear and let this package provide stable routing on top of that governance. In practice, teams get the best outcome when they treat anchor keywords as product interface contracts and update them with care.

The source website material also highlights a useful product truth: users move between different decision horizons. Some actions are immediate, such as checking rank priority before spending resources. Some actions are short-cycle, such as checking reward pages around event windows. Some actions are medium-cycle, such as evaluating character options over several sessions. A tiny resolver that supports these transitions lowers friction precisely where repeated usage is most likely.

Good documentation should acknowledge these usage realities. Technical readers do not benefit from hollow marketing language or forced optimization patterns. They benefit from clear scope, explicit tradeoffs, practical examples, and transparent behavior guarantees. That is why this README intentionally reads like an engineering brief informed by product context. The objective is to make integration decisions easier, not to inflate text with repetitive claims.

If you are planning to build on top of this package, a useful architecture is layered responsibility. Keep this package as the canonical fast-path resolver. Handle alias expansion, typo tolerance, localization adaptation, and telemetry outside the package in your application layer. This keeps the core package small and auditable while allowing product-specific complexity where it belongs. It also prevents lock-in to one interpretation of “smart matching,” which can vary between products.

Another practical recommendation is to track unresolved query patterns. If users repeatedly submit phrases that should map to known destinations but do not, improve anchor vocabulary first before expanding matching logic. In many systems, naming quality creates bigger wins than algorithmic complexity. Better naming increases both user understanding and routing reliability. Better naming also reduces future support load.

The package is also useful in governance discussions because it enforces a clean boundary between profile data and executable behavior. Profile owners control anchor labels and canonical URLs. Integrators consume that profile through a stable function. That separation makes responsibilities visible. It reduces ambiguous ownership and shortens incident response when behavior appears incorrect. Instead of debugging opaque ranking internals, teams can inspect explicit data and explicit rules.

For contributor onboarding, this clarity is valuable. A new maintainer can read this README, inspect the source, and understand the full decision path quickly. There is no hidden ranking engine, no dynamic scorer loaded from unknown state, and no external service dependency to reverse engineer. New contributors can become effective sooner, which generally improves package longevity and release quality.

This package is intentionally aligned with the broader profile strategy in this repository. Every language package focuses on one simple direction. The Python variant focuses on deterministic intent-to-link mapping. That consistency makes cross-language maintenance easier. It also helps teams compare behavior across ecosystems without reconciling radically different design models for the same website profile.

A common question is whether this package should support fuzzy matching out of the box. The default answer is no, at least not as a first move. Fuzzy matching can be useful, but it can also create surprising routes and hidden confidence issues. For many product surfaces, a strict baseline with explicit fallback behavior produces higher trust. If fuzzy behavior is needed, it should be added deliberately with clear boundaries and measurable outcomes.

Another frequent question is whether static anchors are too limiting. In many production contexts, static anchors are a strength. They provide stable contracts, easy audits, and predictable diffs in code review. Dynamic anchor discovery may look flexible, but it often introduces nondeterminism and runtime risk that outweighs the benefits for this class of utility package. Static data can still evolve through clear release flows, and that is usually enough.

For deployment hygiene, keep versioning disciplined. Treat anchor changes as meaningful behavior updates. Communicate those changes clearly in release notes. If your downstream systems depend on specific routing outcomes, pin versions and roll forward with tests. This is standard package management advice, but it is especially relevant when routing behavior is user-visible.

In terms of performance expectations, this package should remain effectively constant-time for current anchor scale. Even if anchor count grows modestly, the operational profile remains lightweight for typical usage patterns. If profile scope grows substantially in the future, teams can still preserve API stability while optimizing internals. That evolution path remains open because the current surface area is intentionally small.

From a product communication viewpoint, there is also value in consistency of destination language. If your support responses, UI hints, and automation outputs all point users toward the same canonical pages, user trust increases. Users stop second-guessing whether one route is outdated. Internal teams spend less time reconciling contradictory guidance. Small consistency improvements often deliver large perceived quality gains.

This README also follows a deliberate writing constraint: links appear naturally inside relevant discussion rather than as spam-like dumps. That approach helps humans understand why each destination matters and how it fits the user journey. It also keeps the document credible for technical readers who need actionable understanding, not decorative link volume.

At the same time, this package still provides practical usage guidance at the end of the document. The point of long-form context is to support informed integration, not to replace implementation detail. Once scope and behavior are clear, integration should remain short and obvious. That is exactly the intended balance.

In summary, `dt-link-health` is a compact, predictable routing utility for Dragon Traveler profile workflows. It is intentionally narrow, intentionally transparent, and intentionally easy to maintain. It helps convert repeated player intent into canonical destination routing with minimal overhead. If your team values stable behavior, clear ownership, and low integration cost, this package provides a solid baseline that can be safely embedded across multiple app surfaces.


## Release Workflow Notes

A long-form README only helps if it stays operationally useful through future edits. In production teams, documentation quality drops when ownership is vague, release cadence is inconsistent, or behavior changes are shipped without clear review gates. To keep this package reliable, use a small and repeatable release discipline. First, define one person as package release owner per sprint. Ownership can rotate, but every release should have a single accountable reviewer. Second, keep one compact checklist that validates behavior before publishing. The checklist should include expected query routing outcomes, non-match outcomes, package metadata checks, and one quick usage run in an environment that mirrors your actual integration path.

Third, keep language in docs and language in product surfaces synchronized. If support teams refer to one intent label and UI teams refer to another, routing quality will degrade even if code is unchanged. Review unresolved queries weekly and decide whether fixes belong to anchor vocabulary, UI copy, or caller-side normalization. Avoid rushing into complex matching logic before finishing these lower-cost corrections. In practice, naming alignment solves many routing misses.

Fourth, treat documentation edits like code edits. Require review, keep changes scoped, and include rationale in commit messages. If a destination policy changes, explain why. If behavior changes, add or update a minimal verification step. This protects future maintainers from hidden assumptions. Finally, remember that concise usage examples are not optional decoration. They are how new integrators prove the package works in their context. Keeping install and usage snippets clean, realistic, and stable is one of the most practical ways to reduce support load over time while preserving trust in the package.

## Install

```bash
pip install dt-link-health
```

## Minimal Usage

```python
from dt_link_health import check_anchor_urls

for row in check_anchor_urls():
    print(row)
```

## API

`check_anchor_urls()` returns health rows for configured anchors, including status and success fields for operational checks.

## Integration Notes

- Keep this package as the deterministic routing core.
- Add advanced normalization in callers only when product behavior truly requires it.
- Treat non-match outcomes as valid and handle fallback explicitly.
- Update anchor vocabulary before introducing heavier matching logic.