EDGAR 10-K Filing

Company CIK: 826253
Filing Year: 2022
Filename: 826253_10-K_2022_0001213900-22-033742.json

---

ITEM 1. BUSINESS
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
Introduction
Aura Systems, Inc., is a Delaware corporation that was founded in 1987. The Company designs, assembles, tests and sells our proprietary and patented axial flux (“AF”) induction machines known as the AuraGen® for industrial and commercial applications and the AuraGen® VIPER for military applications (collectively referred to as the “AuraGen®”). The AuraGen® can be used either as an electric motor or generator depending on the rotational speed of the rotor relative to the rotational speed of the magnetic field produced by the stator; when the rotor rotates slower than the magnetic field the AuraGen® acts as an electric motor and when the rotor rotates faster than the magnetic field, the AuraGen® acts as a generator.
Traditional induction machines use a radial flux (“RF”) design as opposed to the axial flux design of the AuraGen®. These traditional RF machines have been the conventional workhorses of industry due to their robustness, attractive cost, and ease of control. However, RF machines are both heavy and bulky making them ill-suited for a variety of applications in which size and weight are paramount considerations, including most mobile applications. Although axial flux technology has long been recognized as having a higher energy density (more energy per unit volume or weight) than traditional RF induction machines, for many years, however, RF technology was considered the only solution because of perceived insurmountable technological impediments to the creation of a viable axial flux equivalent including: (i) challenges controlling the strong axial magnetic attraction force between the stator and the rotor, (ii) fabrication difficulties such as cutting the slots in laminated cores, (iii) high cost involved in manufacturing the laminated stator core, (iv) difficulties in assembling the machine and maintaining a uniform air gap and (v) providing a laminated rotor that can stand the large centrifugal forces. Aura, however, has overcome these barriers through a variety of technological innovations.
The issue of a strong axial magnetic attraction force between the stator and the rotor was addressed by Aura’s patented approach of using a topology of two stators and a rotor sandwiched between them or two rotors and a stator sandwiched between. The issues related to the fabrication and the high cost of manufacturing of the laminated stator cores were resolved by Aura using a technique involving punching the slots while rolling the steel, resulting in a continuous punched steel ribbon at a cost less than traditional punched laminates. Using various modern techniques and instruments, Aura has also overcome the difficulties in assembling the machine and maintaining a uniform air gap. Aura has also developed a patented cast rotor that does not require any laminates and provides the structural integrity to withstand large centrifugal forces, while at the same time provides the proper electric and magnetic properties. Thus, although the general operating principals of the AuraGen® are the same as a traditional RF machine, the novel design of the AuraGen® and its unique performance characteristics offer perceivable advantages over traditional RF technology.
● A Smaller Footprint and a Lighter Weight Makes the AuraGen® Uniquely Suited for Applications in which Fit, and Weight are Critical Factors. On average, the AuraGen® system is approximately 50 percent lighter than comparable RF systems. Likewise, on average the AuraGen® has a volume of approximately 35% of RF equivalent machines. As a result, the AuraGen® is uniquely able to be installed in locations traditional RF technology cannot possibly due to size and weight. The use of an AuraGen® motor or generator with a disc rotor can thus be adopted in the construction of various devices with advantages in size, weight, and function. In addition, Aura’s axial flux design readily lends itself to stacking multiple rotors and stators on the same shaft, thus designing a relatively compact system capable of very large outputs.
● AuraGen® Provides Greater Output Efficiency as Compared to Traditional RF Technology. Aura’s Axial Flux rotor design has significantly less inertia than the rotor used in equivalent traditional RF machines. As a result, Aura’s systems require less input horsepower to rotate at the required rpm, resulting in an increase in output efficiency. In addition, Aura’s stators require approximately 60% less copper than used in equivalent RF machines with much shorter stator coil end turns and shorter flux return paths. As a result, Aura’s design provides lower copper losses (additional increase in output efficiency) and lower manufacturing cost. In addition, specific AuraGen® geometry/symmetry results in magnetic flux paths that inherently avoid parasitic eddy currents without need for laminates All of the above contribute to an increase in efficiency.
● Unlike Other electrical machines that are Dependent on Foreign Rare Earth Metals, the AuraGen® is Not. The AuraGen®, being an induction machine, does not use any permanent magnets (“PM”). Typical PM machines use NeFeB magnets (rare earths) that are mostly produced in China. In an article titled U.S. Needs a Strong Defense Against China’s Rare Earth weapon, written James Stavridis of Bloomberg opinion March 4, 2021 “China controls roughly 80% of the rare-earths market, between what it mines itself and processes in raw material from elsewhere. If it decided to wield the weapon of restricting the supply - something it has repeatedly threatened to do - it would create a significant challenge for manufacturers and a geopolitical predicament for the industrialized world. … In 2010, Beijing threatened to cut off exports to Japan over the disputed Senkaku Islands. Two years ago, Beijing was reportedly considering restrictions on exports to the U.S. generally, as well as against specific companies (such as defense giant Lockheed Martin Corp.) that it deemed in violation of its policies against selling advanced weapons to Taiwan.
● Most EVs use PM machines. In applications that require variable speed and variable loads, such as in EV applications, the magnetic B field should be adjusted over the operating range. Generally bucking B fields are required to adjust for the B field produced by the Permanent magnets. In contrast, Aura’s induction machines do not have any PM and B fields are easily adjustable. This means that at light loads the controller can reduce voltage such that magnetic losses are reduced, and efficiency is maximized. Thus, Aura’s induction machine when operated with an Aura smart controller has an advantage over a PM machine - magnetic and conduction losses can be traded such that efficiency is optimized. This advantage. becomes increasingly important as performance is increased.
After a lengthy development period, the Company first began commercializing the AuraGen® in late 1999 and early 2000. In 2001, the first commercial AuraGen® product was a 4-pole machine which, when combined with our proprietary and patented electronic control unit (“ECU”), generated 5 kW of exportable 120/240 VAC power. We subsequently added a 6-pole configuration and introduced our patented bi-directional power supply that provided for 8.5 kW watts of exportable power with the capability of providing both alternating (“AC”) and direct (“DC”) power simultaneously. In Fiscal 2008, the Company introduced an AuraGen® system that generated up to 17 kW of continuous power by combining two 8.5 kW systems on a single shaft. Starting in July 2019, we began to redesign and upgrade the ECU and develop new axial flux generator configurations. As a result of such efforts, our redesigned ECU allows us to replace the old 5 kW solution with a 6.5 kW solution using the same 4-pole generator as well as to upgrade the output of the 6-pole machine from 8.5 kW to 15 kW. Our recent efforts have also resulted in the development of a 15-kW solution specifically designed to address cell tower needs of 240 VAC and simultaneously 48 VDC as well as new 4 kW and 10 kW solutions. The new 4 kW as a motor is approximately 6.5 inches in diameter and approximately 5 inches deep and has efficiency above 90%. The new 10 kW design as a mobile generator is approximately 8 inches in diameter, and 5 inches in axial length and efficiency higher than 92%.
To date, the Company has sold approximately 11,000 AuraGen® solutions for numerous applications.
During the first half of Fiscal 2016, the Company significantly reduced operations due to lack of financial resources. During the second half of Fiscal 2016, the Company’s operations were further disrupted when the Company was forced to move from its facilities in Redondo Beach, California to a smaller shared facility in Stanton, California. During Fiscal 2017, the Company curtailed much of its engineering, manufacturing, sales, and marketing activities to focus on renegotiating numerous financial obligations. During Fiscal 2018, the Company successfully restructured in excess of $30 million of debt and held its first stockholder meeting since 2011. During Fiscal 2019, the Company continued to focus on seeking new sources of financing and utilized a contract manufacturer for very limited manufacturing. During fiscal 2019 the Company sold 11 systems.
In March 2019, stockholders of the Company represented a majority of the outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock delivered signed written consents to the Company removing Ronald Buschur, William Anderson and Si Ryong Yu as members of the Company’s Board and electing Ms. Cipora Lavut, Mr. David Mann, and Dr. Robert Lempert as directors of the Company in their stead. Because of Aura’s refusal to recognize the legal effectiveness of the consents, in April 2019 the stockholders filed suit in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware pursuant to Section 225 of the Delaware General Corporations Law, seeking an order confirming the validity of the consents. On July 8, 2019 the Court of Chancery entered final judgment in favor of the stockholder plaintiffs, confirming that (a) Ronald Buschur, Si Ryong Yu and William Anderson had been validly removed by the holders of a majority of the Company’s outstanding stock acting by written consent (b) Ms. Lavut, Mr. Mann and Dr. Lempert had been validly elected by the holders of a majority of the Company’s outstanding stock acting by written consent, and (c) the Company’s Board of Directors validly consists of Cipora Lavut, David Mann, Robert Lempert, Gary Douglas and Salvador Diaz-Versón, Jr. See Item 3, Legal Proceedings for more information. Following this ruling by the Court of Chancery, the newly confirmed Board of Directors terminated the employment of Melvin Gagerman, who had served as CEO and CFO of the Company since 2006, and installed Ms. Lavut as President, Mr. Mann as Chief Financial Officer and Dr. Lempert as Secretary of the Company. In February 2022, Mr. Steven Willett was appointed CFO.
Upon assuming control in the second half of Fiscal 2020, the Company’s new management team began significantly increasing its engineering, manufacturing and marketing activities as well as rebuilding relationships with its vendors and suppliers. Through these efforts, since July 8, 2019, the Company has shipped more than one-hundred and forty units (a greater than ten-fold increase over Fiscal 2019) and recorded approximately $1.0 million in revenue. During Fiscal 2022 and Fiscal 2021, the Company’s revenues and operations were adversely affected by the COVID-19 pandemic which resulted in a decline in revenues and shipments to customers.
Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic
The COVID-19 global pandemic has negatively affected the global economy, disrupted global supply chains, and created extreme volatility and disruptions to capital and credit markets in the global financial markets. We began to see the impact of COVID-19 during our fourth quarter of Fiscal 2020 with our Chinese joint venture’s manufacturing facilities being required to close and many of our customers suspending their own operations due to the COVID-19 pandemic. As a result, net sales and production levels during the fourth quarter of Fiscal 2020 and the entirety of Fiscal 2021 were significantly reduced, thus impacting our results of operations during these fiscal periods.
In response to the COVID-19 pandemic and business disruption, we implemented certain measures to manage costs, preserve liquidity and enhance employee safety. These measures included the following:
● Careful monitoring of operating expenses including wages and salaries;
● Enhanced cleaning and disinfection procedures at our facilities, promotion of social distancing at our facilities and requirements for employees to work from home where possible;
● Reduction of capital expenditures; and
● Deferral of discretionary spending.
As of the filing of this Annual Report on Form 10-K on June 15, 2022, the extent of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on our business, financial results and liquidity will depend largely on future developments, including the effectiveness of vaccination programs globally, the impact on capital and financial markets and the related impact on our customers, especially in the commercial vehicle markets. These future developments are outside of our control, are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted. If the impact is prolonged due, for example, to variant strains of the COVID-19 having an adverse impact, then it can further increase the difficulty of planning for operations and may require us to take further actions as it relates to costs and liquidity. These and other potential impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic will continue to adversely impact our results for the current year, Fiscal 2023, and that impact could be material.
Business Arrangements
During Fiscal 2018 and Fiscal 2019, the Company’s engineering, manufacturing, sales, and marketing activities were reduced while we focused on renegotiating numerous financial obligations. During this time, the Company’s agreements with numerous customers, third party vendors, and organizations and entities material to the operation of the Company business were canceled, delayed or terminated. During Fiscal 2018, the Company successfully restructured in excess of $30 million of debt. Also, during Fiscal 2018, the Company signed a joint venture agreement with a Chinese company to build, service and distribute AuraGen® products in China. Under the Jiangsu Shengfeng joint venture agreement, the Chinese partner owns 51% of the joint venture and the Company owns 49%. The Chinese partner contributed a total of approximately $9.75 million to the venture principally in the form of facilities, equipment, and approximately $500,000 of working capital while the Company contributed $250,000 in cash as well as a limited license. The limited license sold to the joint venture, however, does not permit the venture to manufacture the AuraGen® rotor; rather, the joint venture is required to purchase all rotor subassemblies as well as certain software elements directly from the Company. During Fiscal 2018, Jiangsu Shengfeng placed a $1,000,000 order with the Company including a $700,000 advance payment of which the Company has failed to deliver product in accordance with the order received. On November 20, 2019, the Company reached a preliminary agreement with Jiangsu Shengfeng regarding the return of $700,000 previously advanced to the Company. The preliminary agreement reached consists of a non-interest-bearing promissory note and a payment plan pursuant to which the $700,000 is to be paid over a 11-month period beginning March 15, 2020, through February 15, 2021. The preliminary agreement was subject to the JV continuous operation. However, starting in January 2020 the JV was shut down by the Chinese authority due to the COVID-19 virus, and as of the date of this filing, the JV operation has not restarted. In February 29, 2020, the unpaid balance of $700,000 was reported as part of notes payables - related party in the accompanying financial statements. During Fiscal 2020, the Company recorded an impairment expense of $250,000 to fully write-off the Jiangsu Shengfeng investment due to the uncertainty of the operation.
In Fiscal 2020 stockholders of the Company successfully removed Ronald Buschur, William Anderson and Si Ryong Yu from the Company’s Board of Directors and elected Ms. Cipora Lavut, Mr. David Mann and Dr. Robert Lempert as directors of the Company in their stead. See Item 3, Legal Proceedings for more information. Also, in Fiscal 2020, Melvin Gagerman, Aura’s CEO and CFO since 2006, was replaced. In July 2019 Ms. Lavut succeeded Mr. Gagerman as President and Mr. Mann succeeded Mr. Gagerman as CFO. Dr. Lempert was appointed as Secretary of the Company by the Board of Directors also in July 2019. In February 2022, Mr. Steven Willett was appointed CFO. During the second half of Fiscal 2020, the Company began significantly increasing its engineering, manufacturing and marketing activities. From July 8, 2019, through the end of Fiscal year 2022 (February 28, 2022), we shipped more than 140 units to customers (a more than a ten-fold increase over Fiscal 2019).
Recent Developments.
Beginning in Fiscal 2020, a novel strain of coronavirus commonly referred to as COVID-19 emerged and spread rapidly across the globe, including throughout all major geographies in which we operate (North America, Europe, and Asia), resulting in adverse economic conditions and business disruptions, as well as significant volatility in global financial markets. Governments worldwide have imposed varying degrees of preventative and protective actions, such as temporary travel bans, forced business closures, and stay-at-home orders, all in an effort to reduce the spread of the virus. Such factors, among others, have resulted in a significant decline in spending and resource availability. Additionally, during this period of uncertainty, companies across a wide array of industries have implemented various initiatives to reduce operating expenses and preserve cash balances, including work furloughs, reduced pay, and severance actions, which could lower consumers’ disposable income levels or willingness to purchase discretionary items.
As a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, we have experienced varying degrees of business disruptions and periods of closure of our corporate facilities as have our customers, suppliers, and vendors, resulting in significant adverse impacts to our operating results. Resurgences in certain parts of the world resulted in further business disruptions periodically throughout Fiscal 2022 and Fiscal 2021. Such disruptions have continued into the first quarter of Fiscal 2023, impacting our business.
Despite the introduction of COVID-19 vaccines, the pandemic remains highly volatile and continues to evolve. Accordingly, we cannot predict for how long and to what extent the pandemic will impact our business operations or the global economy as a whole.
The AuraGen®/VIPER Product Overview:
Markets Served by the AuraGen®/VIPER
Induction Motor Applications
Aura’s axial flux induction machine can be used as either an electric motor or generator as described above. Due to the inherit advantages of Aura’s axial flux induction machine, such as (i) no rare earth or any other kind of permanent magnets, (ii) significantly less copper (60% less) than equivalent traditional induction motors (iii) higher energy density and (iv) fewer overall materials, we believe Aura’s axial flux induction motor can be used across a wide range of industries and applications. Because even a small percent increase in motor efficiency translates to a market-wide savings of tens of billions of dollars per year and because Aura’s axial flux motor design is more efficient than equivalent radial flux induction motors, we believe that with the proper financial resources, over time, we can capture a reasonable share of the global electric motor market.
Electric motor are the main users of electricity, accounting for approximately 53% of the global demand for electricity. Over 65% of the energy used to support electric motors is used for industrial motor systems.1 The industrial electric motor market is expected to grow from an estimated USD 113.3 billion in 2020 to USD 169.1 billion by 2026, at a CAGR of 6.9% during the forecast period2. The increase in global electricity consumption, and the use of electrical equipment and machines in different industries and the renewables sector are major factors driving growth in the electric motor market during the forecast period
Electric motors are employed in infrastructure, major structures, and industries all around the world. Each year, approximal 30 million motors are sold for industrial use alone3. Electric motors find application in a variety of equipment throughout industry. Common industrial applications include: (i) compressors, (ii) fans and blowers, (iii) heavy duty equipment, (iv) HVAC systems, (v) pumps and (vi) machine tools (laths and mills etc.) Electric motors and generators are one of the most important tools in modern day life.
Numerous studies show a high potential for energy efficiency improvement in motor systems. Specifically, system optimization approaches which address the entire motor system demonstrate high potential for energy savings. For most countries the saving potentials for energy efficiency improvements in motor systems with best available technology lie between 9 and 13 percent of the national industrial electricity demand4.
Aura’s machines use approximately 60% less copper, are approximately 1/3 the size and weight and are more efficient than the equivalent traditional radial flux (“RF”) induction machine.
When compared to radial and axial flux permanent magnet machines, Aura machines are less expensive to manufacture, do not use any rare earths, do not use any permanent magnets, are not dependent on supply from China, are more robust, have a higher operating speed range, have lower maintenance, have a longer lifetime, and are generally smaller, lighter and higher in efficiency.
EV applications
The universal global trend for electrification has created in addition to the industrial demand for motors also a very large demand for motors used in electric transportation for vehicles, planes, and boats (“EV”). In such applications, one or more electric motors are used for propulsion. The power to drive the electric motors is generally a battery system or fuel cell. Both batteries and fuel cells convert some form of fuel to electricity through some chemical process. EVs include, but are not limited to, road and off-road vehicles, surface and underwater vessels, electric aircraft, and electric spacecraft.
Identification of Technoeconomic Opportunities with the Use of Premium Efficiency Motors as Alternative for Developing Countries -Julio R. Gómez etc. Published: October 16, 2020
Markets & Markets Electric Motor Market Published Date: Nov 2020 | Report Code: EP 3882
Precedence Research October 6, 2021
Energy efficiency in electric motor systems- UN industrial Development Organization Venna 2012
It is rather interesting to note that, while electric motors have been around for more than 200 years, technical information on electric motors in EVs is very scarce and generally only found in niche technology sites. Most EV literature only notes the motor’s relative quietness, its torque response, its simplicity, and long-term low maintenance requirements. Most of the space dedicated to the powertrain (motor, motor- controller and some cases a gear box) is focuses, instead, on the battery-its size and weight, where it sits, the range, how long it takes to fully charge, etc. Yet, the only function of the battery system is to support the electric motors and its controller.
In addition to the batteries, the electric motor and supporting power electronics are critical components of EV drivetrain. It is expected that over 100 million electric motors will be required per year by 2032 to meet the demand for the growing EV market5 (where would all the rare earths come from to support 100 million motors per year?).
The global Electric Vehicle Market size is projected to grow from 4 million units in 2021 to 34.76 million units by 20306. The AC motor (most power by alternating current) is expected to witness the fastest growth in the electric motor market during the forecast period.
The global electric powertrain market (electric motor, plus motor controller plus a gear box) size is projected to surpass around US$ 200 billion by 2027 and growing at a CAGR 13.8%. The motor/generator component expected to show lucrative growth over the analysis period attributed to the escalated penetration of plug-in hybrid battery electric vehicle (“PHEV”) and battery electric vehicle (“BEV”) across the globe7
There are several key performance metrics for electric motors. Power and torque density enables improved driving dynamics in a smaller and lighter package, with weight and space being at a premium in EVs. Another critical area is efficiency. Improving efficiency means that less energy stored in the battery is wasted when accelerating the vehicle, resulting in improved range from the same battery capacity. Smaller motor system weight will also contribute to increase in range since less weight needs to be moved.
Most electric motors currently used for electric mobility employ high energy permanent magnets8. The magnetic material is usually sintered neodymium-iron-boron (NdFeB) made or processed in China. Neodymium is one of the rare earth elements. China has around a third of all rare earth reserves and around 90% of global production9. In 1987 the Chinese President Deng Xiaoping famously said, “the middle East has Oil; China has rare earths”. An Oxford Analytics Expert briefing on July 30, 2020, states that “(i) Permanent Magnets will account for 3⁄4 of rare earth demand by 2030 up from 1⁄4 in 2020 and (ii)Electric vehicles and off shore wind will drive demand and be most vulnerable to supply shocks”.
Emerging Electric Motor Technologies for the EV Market Sep 28, 2021Luke Gear
Market & market Electric Vehicle Market May 2021 Report code AT4907
Precedence research June 9, 2021
Will rare earth be eliminated in EV motor-Dr. James Edmondson Nov 2-2020
Vikendi December 29, 2021
Permanent magnet (“PM”) machines can be extremely light in weight and highly efficient. In PM machines the magnetic field B is fixed by the magnets and the only way to change this is with a bucking field. These bucking currents result in increase in temperature that could affect the magnetization of the permanent magnets.
In PM machines the operating temperature must be kept at below 100oC because at that temperature the magnets start to lose some of their magnetization and at 180oC they become completely demagnetized. However, in EV applications at low speed, one needs to use a lot of current (generating high heat) to get the required torque; similarly, at high speeds one needs a lot of current for the bucking fields to reduce the B field. Thus, PM machines for mobility require a very complex cooling system. All the components in the machine are designed for maximum specifications but operationally the machine is limited by temperature requirements of the magnets. The cost of such machines is high due to (i) The permanent magnets ($50-$70 per kg), (ii) the complex cooling system and (iii) complex controller.
In addition to the cost issues, the permanent magnets are subject to the economic and political control of China. There is always the possible situation that China economically weaponizes rare earth and stops sending the refined product to the U.S so they cannot be used in weapon systems or commercial applications such as electric vehicles10. In the past during political disputes China threatened to cease export of rare earths11.
Unlike the PM machines, Aura’s axial flux induction machines do not use any permanent magnets and therefore the controller can change the B fields since B is proportionate to the voltage divided by the frequency (V/f). Thus, the Aura machine, when operated with a smart inverter, has an advantage over a PM machine. The Aura machine has a smaller volume, equal or better efficiency, more reliable and a large cost advantage. This advantage becomes increasingly important as performance is increased.
Mobile and Remote Power Applications
The global generator sales market was $20.3 billion in 2019 and is estimated to reach $27.16 billion by 2027 (Fortune Business Insight). Most industries dealing with construction and infrastructure rely on mobile generators to support modern computers, digital sensors and instruments as well as electrical driven tools. Current automotive alternators cannot supply the existing demanded power for many such applications and thus the common solution is the use of stand-alone gensets (often referred to a “Auxiliary Power Units” or simply “APUs”). These APUs, however, (i) consume large amounts of fuel, (ii) are heavy and bulky and accordingly must often be towed on trailers, and (iii) require constant maintenance. Additionally, traditional APUs are generally not considered to be environmentally friendly power solutions based on their high fuel consumption, loud operating noise levels, and the emissions they secrete into the air. In comparison, the AuraGen® system is small and light enough to generally be integrated directly into existing vehicles, does not require significant maintenance, nor do they require any set-up or tear-down time. In addition, there are no heavy lifting required and to contact with hot surfaces. The AuraGen® operation when integrated in a vehicle or a boat is completely seamless and transparent to the user.
Likewise, for law enforcement, emergency responders and militaries alike, mobile power is generally a necessity. Indeed, one of the fastest growing segments for mobile power is the military marketplace for On-Board-Exportable-Power (OBEP), which is electric power on vehicles that can be used to support non-vehicle functions such as weapon systems and C4I functions (command, control, communication, computers and information). Currently, most on-board power is provided by APUs. Given the drawbacks of APUs, however, militaries, law enforcement and first responders all over the world are seeking more efficient integrated power solutions for their vehicles.
In addition, numerous leisure users are increasingly demanding mobile power for use of air-conditioning, appliances and other amenities.
China Maintains Dominance in Rare Earth Production-National defense 9/8/21 by Stew Magnuson
Supercomputers Predict rare earth Market Vulnerability-National defense 9/9/21 by Stew Magnuson
Beside stand-alone gensets (often referred to “auxiliary power units” or simply “APU” s), all automotive users rely on integrated alternators in their vehicles for such things as navigation systems, electric seating, electric windows, sound/ phone systems and lights. In 2019 alone, 87.9 million passenger vehicles were sold globally12 (each one used an alternator. The market for automotive alternators is presently dominated mainly by four companies: Denso, Valeo, Mitsubishi Electric, and Hitachi Automotive. These companies jointly control nearly 80% of the global market. The compact size and significant increase in efficiency of the AuraGen® provides an ideal replacement (fit and form) for high output automotive alternators while offering higher efficiency, longer lifetime and the flexibility of multi types of voltage both AC and DC. Recently, the Company completed the design for a 10-kW alternator with diameter of less than 8 inches and axial length of less than 6 inches. The new 10 kW alternator will provide the full 10 kW power at alternator speeds of 2,500-13,000 rpm with efficiency higher than 92%.
The AuraGen® solution increase in efficiency over traditional generators, when combined with our load following architecture and the ability to provide both AC and -48VDC simultaneously makes our solution very attractive to cell towers operators that depend on diesel power. Our solution has the potential for a significant reduction in diesel fuel consumption for such an application.
Competition
The Company is involved in the application of its AuraGen® technology to electric motors and mobile power. Therefore, it faces substantial competition from companies offering different technologies.
Electric Motors
There are four (4) basic approaches for electrical machines: (i) the rotor can be electrically excited such that it creates a magnetic field with constant orientation (as in synchronous machines) and usually uses brushes and or commutators; (ii) the shape of the rotor can induce reluctance variations in the stator (as in switched reluctance machines); (iii) the rotor can be permanently magnetized with permanent magnets (“PM “) as in brushless DC machines; and (iv) the rotor field can be induced from the stator due to the rotor’s structure as in induction machines. Our axial flux technology is an induction machine.
Brushed machines are machines in which the rotor coil is supplied with current through brushes. Unlike commutators, brushes only transfer electric current to a moving rotor; commutators also provide switching of the current direction. Large, brushed machines which are run with DC to the stator windings at synchronous speed are the most common generator in power plants because they also supply reactive power to the grid. They can be started by the turbine and can generate power at constant speed without a controller. This type of machine is often referred to in the literature as a “synchronous machine”.
Reluctance machines have no windings in the rotor, only a ferromagnetic material shaped so that “electromagnets” in the stator can “grab” the teeth in the rotor resulting in a slight movement. The electromagnets are then turned off, while another set of electromagnets is turned on to move the stator further. Reluctance machines are also sometimes referred to as “step motors” as a result of the step-like movement. These machines are suited for low speed and accurate position control. Reluctance machines can be supplied with PMs in the stator to improve performance. The “electromagnet” is then “turned off” by sending a negative current to the coil. When the current is positive the magnet and the current cooperate to create a stronger magnetic field, which will improve the reluctance machine’s maximum torque without increasing the currents maximum absolute value.
PM machines have permanent magnets in the rotor which set up a magnetic field. The magnetic field is created by modern PMs (Neodymium Iron Boron magnets “NeFeB”), which means that PM machines have a higher torque/volume and torque/weight ratio than machines with rotor coils under continuous operation.
In general, it is usually possible to overload electric machines for a short time until the current in the coils heats parts of the machine to a temperature which cause damage. However, PM machines are very sensitive to such overloads because too high of a current in the coils can create a magnetic field strong enough to demagnetize the magnets. The majority (85%) NeFeB magnets are produced in China. Magnax and many other are examples of Companies using such an approach.
Motor Intelligence. Automotive alternator market growth trends forecast 2021-2026)
AC induction machine (no PM) is the most common electrical machine in use today. A changing magnetic field in the stator induces a current in the rotor. The current in the rotor produces its own magnetic field, which then interacts with the magnetic field of the stator, causing the rotor to turn. The name induction comes from the fact that current is induced in the rotor by the changing magnetic field of the stator. Radial flux induction machines have been the workhorse of industry due to their robustness, attractive cost, and easy of control; however, they are relatively, heavy and bulky. On the other hand, Aura’s axial flux (“AF”) induction machines, have all of the advantages of the radial flux machines but with the advantage of higher energy density and higher efficiency resulting in a smaller and lighter machine with equivalent or better performance. Unlike the PM machines, induction machines do not use any permanent magnets and therefore the controller can change the B fields since B is proportionate to the voltage divided by the frequency (V/f).
Although our axial flux induction technology provides significant advantages in both cost (significant less copper, steel and aluminum), size/weight and performance, most of our competitors have far greater financial, technical, and marketing resources than we have. They have larger budgets for research, new product development and marketing, and have long-standing customer relationships.
Key players in the market are (i) Nidec Motor Corporation, (ii) ABB Ltd., (iii) Siemens AG, (iv) WEG Electric Corp, (v) Regal Beloit Corporation, (vi) Wolong, and (vii)Teco Westinghouse.
Generators
There are five basic approaches used in mobile generators
Gensets AKA APU. Portable generators meet the large market need for auxiliary power. Millions of units per year are sold in North America alone, and millions more are sold across the world to meet market demands for 1 to 20 Kilowatts of portable power. The market for these power levels addresses the commercial, leisure and residential markets, and is essentially divided into: (a) higher power, higher quality and higher price commercial level units; and (b) lower power, lower quality and lower price level units. Gensets provide the strongest competition across the widest marketplace for auxiliary power. Onan, Honda, Generac and Kohler, among others, are well established and respected brand names in the genset market for higher reliability auxiliary power generation. There are over 40 registered genset-manufacturing companies in the United States.
Some of the key suppliers are Caterpillar (US), Cummins (US), Rolls-Royce Holdings (UK), Atlas Copco (Sweden), Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd. (Japan), Yanmar (Japan), Generac (US), ABB (Switzerland), Siemens Energy (Germany), Weichai Group (China), Kohler Co. (US), Kirloskar Oil Engines Ltd. (India), Denyo (Japan), and Sterling & Wilson (India),
High Output Alternators. There are many High Output Alternator manufacturers. Some of the better-known ones are Delco-Remy, Bosh, Nippon Densu, Hitachi, Mitsubishi and Prestolite. All alternators provide their rated power at very high RPM and significantly less power at lower RPM. In addition, alternators are generally only 30% efficient at the low RPM range and increase to 50% efficiency at the high RPM range.
Inverters. There are many inverter manufacturers across the globe; the best known one is Xentrex. The pricing of industrial grade sine wave inverters is approximately $400 per kilowatt plus the cost of a high output alternator (estimated at $1,000) and a good throttle controller (estimated in the range of $250-500).
Permanent-Magnet Alternators. A number of companies have introduced alternators using exotic rare earth Neodymium (NdFeB) magnets. These alternators tend to have higher power generation capabilities than regular alternators at lower RPM. Unfortunately, PM machines with NdFeB magnets are very sensitive to temperature and, unlike the AuraGen®, cannot survive the typical under-the-hood environment (200oF+). In order to apply such devices for automotive applications one must add an active cooling system to keep the magnets from demagnetizing at approximately 200oF. In addition, most of the rare earth magnets (NeFeB) are manufactured in China and are subject to potential political and economic pressure.
In addition to the temperature challenges of such machines, there are other issues involving active control of the magnetic field. The main disadvantage of PM generators is the difficulty of output voltage regulation to compensate for speed and load variation due to the lack of a simple means of field control.
Fuel Cells. Fuel cells are solid-state, devices that produce electricity by combining a fuel containing hydrogen with oxygen. They have a wide range of applications and can be used in place of the internal combustion engine and traditional lead-acid and lithium-ion batteries. These systems are generally more expensive. The most widely deployed fuel cells are estimated to cost significantly more per kilowatt than alternative solutions.
Others
Evans Electric in Australia has introduced an axial flux machine with a complete conductive rotor. Such a machine was first introduced by Brinner more than 20 years ago and was abandoned because the rotor lacked the required rigidity to withstand the magnetic and centrifugal forces. The Brinner machine is cited in Aura’s issued patents.
Numerous companies are introducing axial flux machines; however, they generally use rare earth NeFeB magnets (made in China) and are thus not induction machines but rather permanent magnet machines. Some of the better-known companies are YASA, EVO, Magnax and Phi Power.
Most of our competitors have far greater financial, technical, and marketing resources than we have. They have larger budgets for research, new product development and marketing, and have long-standing customer relationships. We also compete with many larger and more established companies in the hiring and retention of qualified personnel. Our financial condition has limited our ability to market the AuraGen®.
The AuraGen® uses a different technology and because our product is radically different from traditionally available mobile power solutions, users may require lengthy evaluation periods to gain confidence in the product. OEMs and large fleet users also typically require considerable time to make changes to their planning and production.
Competitive Advantages of the AuraGen® Axial Flux Induction technology
As a motor-Aura’s Axial Flux (“AF”) induction motor/generator is increasingly attracting attention from high impact potential users seeking advantages over conventional motors, particularly for Electric Vehicle applications. These advantages include (i) compact construction, (ii) better power to weight ratio, (iii) shorter axial length, (iv) better efficiency, (v) better torque to volume and weight ratio, (vi) very high utilization of active materials (less than 60% of the copper) and (vii) excellent ventilation and cooling. Induction machines (i) do not use any rare earth elements and have no permanent magnets. Due to their flat shape, lower weight and compact construction, Aura’s axial flux motors are ideal for pumps, fans, food processors, HVHC, etc. An axial flux machine is also preferred in applications where the rotor can be integrated with the rotating part of mechanical loads.
The AuraGen® motor’s operational range is between -40 and 340-degrees F; therefore, it is suitable to operate in a harsh environment.
As an alternator. Aura’s induction machine provides significant advantages in power generation, particularly in mobile applications. Its smaller volume and higher efficiency, when combined with the geometric shape means it can be integrated with existing vehicles and boats. Such integrated solutions do not require set up time. There are no heavy weights to lift (gensets), usable cargo space is optimized and there is no need for separate fuel/containers. Remarkably, there is no scheduled maintenance required.
The AuraGen® alternator’s operational range is between -40- and 340-degrees F; therefore, it is suitable for operating under the hood of a vehicle where the ambient temperature can easily be above 200 degrees F.
Earth-Forward, Green Technology. The AuraGen® system is significantly more environmentally friendly than traditional motors and generator. Because of its extreme efficiency and smaller size, the AuraGen® system utilizes fewer resources and materials to manufacture (in particular less than 60% of the copper). When used in power generation, the AuraGen® uses a vehicle’s primary automotive engine, which is already highly regulated for environmental protection. Traditional mobile power solutions, in comparison, use small, less efficient, auxiliary engines that produce significantly higher levels of emissions per unit of power output than the automobile engine.
Durability; No Scheduled Maintenance. The AuraGen® motor/generator solution does not require any scheduled maintenance. The historical failure rate for Aura’s machines over a 20-year period is less than 0.5%. The bearings are rated for 28,000 hours.
Aura’s axial flux induction (no PM) can be summarized as
● Disruptive since it addresses the entire field of electrical motors and generators by providing a solution that is smaller, lighter, more efficient, cost less to manufacture and does not use any permanent magnets.
● Aura has demonstrated mass production of this technology with more than 11,000 machines.
● The market opportunity for industrial applications of Aura’s motors/generators is more than $100 billion per year.
● The EV powertrain business opportunity for the Aura’s is a significant percentage of the $200+ billion per year projected business.
● The economic value proposition is well defined in terms of cost, performance and size.
● The Aura solution provides significant global reduction in the use of raw materials such as copper, steel, and aluminum.
● The higher efficiency of Aura’s motor, when used in a manufacturing environment, can lead to a noticeable reduction in the global consumption of energy.
● When used for mobile power generation, Aura’s technology leads to a significant reduction in global pollution by being able to reduce and, in many situations, eliminate completely small diesel and gasoline engines used in power generation.
● When used for electric vehicles, the smaller size, weight, and increased efficiency could lead to an increase in range and/or reduced battery weight.
● When used in remote stand-alone diesel power generation such as cell towers, Aura’s increased efficiency, lower rotor inertia, voltages flexibility and load-following architecture results in a significant reduction in fuel usage (and, of course, reduced pollution).
● Aura’s significantly (65% less) lower rotor inertia and variable speed capabilities make Aura’s solution ideal for small hydro applications that are currently being ignored because of construction cost, low head, and slow flow situations.
Targeted Market
The Company is re-examining and identifying new key markets to focus on as the Company expands operations.
The global drive for electrification is in search of better more effective electric motors. The recent realization by many potential users of such motors that permanent magnet motors are depending on NeFeB rare earth magnets from China has created a need for alternative to the PM motors. Our axial flux induction machine is a solution that does not use any magnets and has the required performance characteristic as well as fit and form for numerous applications.
Electric motors
Electric motors for industrial applications. We have completed the design of 4 kW and 10 kW machines. The designs show significantly increased efficiency as compared to equivalent other designs, and in addition they are a fraction of the size and weight, use approximately 50-60% less copper and cost less to manufacture.
Electric motors for electric delivery trucks. We are exploring the use of our axial flux induction machine to be integrated into electric delivery trucks. This application would require approximately 150-kW machine that will use 600-800VDC battery system. We started the design activities for this application and expect to complete the design over the next few months.
Electric motors for high end electric cars. We are exploring the use of our axial flux induction machine to be integrated into high end electric cars. This application would require approximately 250-300-kW machine that will use 800VDC battery system and will operate at 20,000 RPM.
Electric motors for flywheels. Our axial flux machine lends itself to multi stacking of rotors and stators on a single shaft to create motors in the 750kW range with a diameter of approximately 13-14 inches. Due to the solid rotor disk of our axial flux machine one can operate such machines safely in the 20,000 RPM range.
Drive motors for electric boats- We started to explore the possibility of using our axial flux induction machine as a drive motor for small to medium electric boats.
Mobile power generation
Military market. One focused market for the Company’s VIPER solution is military applications. The global military land vehicles market is expected to grow by 29% through 2022, increasing to $30.33 billion by 202213. While traditional markets for military vehicles such as the U.S. are choosing to upgrade and maintain existing fleets rather than replace aging vehicles, other regions are looking to purchase new units, which also provides maintenance and upgrade opportunities. The active number of military vehicles was estimated at over 408,000 in 2012 and is expected to increase to slightly over 418,000 by 2021. New vehicle procurement is expected to decline in western defense and increase in emerging markets of APAC and the Middle East.
Automotive alternators. In 2019, 87.9 million units of passenger cars were sold globally,14 each one used an alternator. The market for automotive alternators is dominated mainly by four companies: Denso, Valeo, Mitsubishi Electric, and Hitachi Automotive. These companies jointly control nearly 80% of the global market. The compact size and significant increase in efficiency of the AuraGen® provides an ideal replacement (fit and form) for high output automotive alternators.
Diesel based cell towers. According to Statista (Technology and telecommunication Thomas Alsop sept 22, 2020), in 2019, there were 395,562 mobile wireless cell sites in the United States, with a large amount of investment going toward 5G-ready cell sites and antennas as per the source. Phil Marshall, chief research officer at Tolaga Research, estimates the global number of base stations at 6.5 million sites, while Chinese equipment vendor Huawei puts the number at 7 million. Many of the cell sites are powered by diesel generators. The AuraGen® solution increase in efficiency over traditional generators, when combined with our load following architecture and the ability to provide both AC and -48VDC simultaneously makes our solution very attractive to cell towers operators that depend on diesel power. Our solution has the potential for significant diesel fuel savings in such an application.
Transport Refrigeration (“TRU”). The main competitors for the all-electric TRU are traditional diesel-based solutions provided by Thermo-king and Carrier. The diesel based comparable systems provided by Thermo-king and Carrier are somewhat less expensive than our AuraGen® all-electric solution, however the diesel solutions require frequent maintenance and the utilization of a separate diesel engine that consumes additional fuel every operating hour. In addition, the diesel solution emits harmful emissions that have been recognized by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, California’s Air Resource Board and others as dangerous pollutants and are increasingly subject to federal and state regulations.
13 John Keller July 10, 2014 Military and Aerospace Electronics
14 Motor Intelligence. Automotive alternator market growth trends forecast 2021-2026)
Facilities, Manufacturing Process and Suppliers
During Fiscal 2021, our facilities consisted primarily of approximately 20,000 square feet in Stanton, California that we shared with ECS Corporation and an additional storage facility in Santa Clarita, California. The Stanton facility was under a month-to-month rental agreement for $10,000 per month. The monthly rent for the Santa Clarita storage facility was also under a month-to-month rental agreement for $5,000 per month and was terminated effective July 31, 2020. Following exit from the Santa Clarita facility in July 2020 through February 28, 2021, we rented temporary storage space for approximately $2,500 per month. In early Fiscal 2022 we consolidated all administrative offices and operations in a new modern stand-alone facility consisting of approximately 18,000 square feet in Lake Forest, California. This Lake Forest facility is subject to a lease agreement with a 66-month lease period effective from February 2021, through August 31, 2026. The monthly base lease rate for the Lake Forest Facility is currently $22,848 per month with a 3% annual escalation.
As the Company continues to expand operations, we will need to renew relationships and contracts with our suppliers or locate suitable new suppliers for subassemblies and other components.
Research and Development
We believe that ongoing research and development is important to the success of our product in order to utilize the most recent technology, develop additional products and additional uses for existing products, stay current with changes in vehicle manufacture and design and to maintain an advantage over potential competition. Our engineering, research and development costs for Fiscal 2022 was approximately $0.6 million compared to approximately $0.2 million in Fiscal 2021.
In Fiscal 2019 we began redesign work on our Electronic Control Unit (“ECU”) to include state-of-the-art power electronics and processors. Work on this redesign was temporarily suspended in mid-2019 when the Company’s then-management team reallocated significant resources to unsuccessfully oppose shareholders controlling a majority of the outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock who sought to replace certain members of the Company’s Board of Directors. On July 8, 2019, the Delaware Court of Chancery entered final judgment confirming the validity of this stockholder action. With the new management team installed, starting in July 2019 work on the ECU redesign resumed and, in September 2019, we successfully tested and implemented this newly designed ECU. As a result of such efforts, our redesigned ECU allows us to replace the old 5 kW solution with a 6.5 kW solution using the same 4-pole generator as well as to upgrade the output of the 6-pole machine from 8.5 kW to 15 kW. Our recent efforts have also resulted in the development of a 15 kW solution specifically designed to address cell tower needs of 240 VAC and simultaneously 48 VDC as well as a new 4 kW solution that is 7.5 inches in diameter and 5 inches deep that is being configured both as a motor and automotive alternator. In Fiscal 2022 we delivered the initial units of our new ECU solution.
Patents and Intellectual Property
Our intellectual property portfolio consists of trademarks, proprietary know-how, trade secrets, and patents. Historically the Company obtained over 70 patents in electromagnetic and electrooptical technologies.
In the area of electromagnetic technology, we have developed numerous magnetic systems and designs that result in a significant increase of magnetic field density per unit volume that can be converted into useful power energy or work. This increase in field density is a factor of three to four, which, when incorporated into mechanical devices, could result in a significant reduction in size and cost of production for the same performance.
The applications of these technological advances are in machines used every day by industrial, commercial, and consumers. We have applied technology to numerous applications in industrial machines, such as generators, motors, actuators, and linear motors.
We hold the following patents: Nos. 6,700,214; 6,700,802; 8,955,624; with expiration dates in 2024, 2024 and 2033, respectively.
At the end of Fiscal 2013 and the first quarter of Fiscal 2014, we filed five new patent applications related to the AuraGen®. These new patent applications are specifically designed to cover the (i) integration of the AuraGen® power solution with transport refrigeration, (ii) the interface kit of the AuraGen® with prime movers, (iii) a water cooled AuraGen® solution for situations where ventilation is not available, (iv) a unique cable system with safety protection to transfer high power between two moving objects, and (v) a unique clamping of power electronic components to heat sink to ensure good thermal conductivity.
The patent application for the integration of the AuraGen® power solution with transport refrigeration was specifically geared for U.S. trucks manufactured prior to 2015. This application was abandoned, and we expect to reexamine the patent ideas over the next 12 months as applied to both U.S. and foreign trucks for more up-to-date required configurations. The patent application for interface kit of the AuraGen® with prime mover patent was issued (8,955,624). A provisional Patent (502,246,733) was issued for the water cooled AuraGen® solution in 2013.
The patent application for a unique cable system with safety protection to transfer high power between two moving objects was abandoned by prior management during the 2015-2019 period. The patent application for a unique clamping of power electronic components to heat sink to ensure good thermal conductivity was abandoned since Aura’s power electronic solution has since been completely redesigned and the old design issues are no longer relevant.
Government Regulation
We are subject to laws and regulations that affect the Company’s activities, which include, but are not limited to, the areas of labor, intellectual property and ownership and infringement, tax, import and export requirements, environmental, and health and safety. As we recommence operations, our operations will again be subject to federal, state and local laws and regulations governing the occupational health and safety of our employees and wage regulations. For example, we are subject to the requirements of the federal Occupational Safety and Health Act, as amended, or OSHA, and comparable state laws that protect and regulate employee health and safety. We expect to expend resources to maintain compliance with OSHA requirements and industry best practices.
Employees
As of the date of this filing, the Company has a total of ten (10) full-time employees in research and development, sales, operations and administration. Additionally, the Company engages independent contractors, on an as-needed basis, to support various areas of the business. During Fiscal 2022 and Fiscal 2021 we engaged three independent contractors, two to support engineering developments, and one for accounting support.
Significant Customers
In fiscal 2022, there were four customers that accounted for over 10% individually of the Company’s revenues, however no customer is considered significant. In fiscal 2021, one significant customer, CBOL, accounted for 83% of revenues.
Backlog
As of the date of the filing of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, the Company has no significant backlog of orders.
Raw Materials
The most important raw materials we use in manufacturing our products are steel, copper, and aluminum. Raw materials are purchased both domestically and outside the United States. We have no significant long-term supply contracts. When possible, we maintain a number of sources for our raw materials, which we believe contribute to our ability to obtain competitive pricing. The cost of some of our raw materials and shipping costs are dependent on petroleum cost. Higher material prices, cost of petroleum, and costs of sourced products could have an adverse effect on margins.
We enter into standard purchase agreements with certain foreign and domestic suppliers to source selected products. The terms of these arrangements are customary for the industry and do not contain any long-term contractual obligations on our behalf.
Available Information
We file annual, quarterly and current reports and other information with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC” or the “Commission”). These materials can be inspected and copied at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. Copies of these materials may also be obtained by mail at prescribed rates from the SEC’s Public Reference Room at the above address. Information about the Public Reference Room can be obtained by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC also maintains a website at www.sec.gov that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC.
On our website, www.aurasystems.com, we provide free of charge our Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K, and any amendments thereto, as soon as reasonably practicable after they have been electronically filed or furnished to the SEC. Information contained on our website is not part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K or our other filings with the SEC.

---

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
ITEM 1A. Risk Factors
We have been a party to litigation, a consent solicitation and a proxy contest with shareholders controlling a majority of the Company’s stock, which is costly and time-consuming and has had a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition and could adversely affect our stock price.
In March 2019, stockholders of the Company representing a majority of the outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock delivered signed written consents to the Company removing Ronald Buschur, William Anderson and Si Ryong Yu as members of the Company’s Board and electing Ms. Cipora Lavut, Mr. David Mann and Dr. Robert Lempert as directors of the Company. Because of Aura’s refusal to recognize the legal effectiveness of the consents, on April 8, 2019 the stockholders filed suit in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware pursuant to Section 225 of the Delaware General Corporations Law, seeking an order confirming the validity of the consents. On July 8, 2019 the Court of Chancery entered final judgment in favor of the stockholder plaintiffs, confirming that (a) Ronald Buschur, Si Ryong Yu and William Anderson had been validly removed by the holders of a majority of the Company’s outstanding stock acting by written consent (b) Ms. Lavut, Mr. Mann and Dr. Lempert had been validly elected by the holders of a majority of the Company’s outstanding stock acting by written consent, and (c) the Company’s Board of Directors validly consists of Cipora Lavut, David Mann, Robert Lempert, Gary Douglas and Salvador Diaz-Versón, Jr. Aura’s refusal to recognize the legal effectiveness of the consents and the decision by the Company’s former leadership team to utilize corporate resources to vigorously contest the shareholder action has consumed significant financial resources, temporarily stagnated operations, and resulted in substantial costs, all of which had a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition.
We have a history of losses, and we may not be profitable in any future period.
Except for Fiscal 2018 and Fiscal 2021, in each fiscal year since our reorganization in 2006, we have reported losses. For Fiscal year 2022, we recorded a net loss of $4.0 million. Since the Company’s Chapter 11 Plan reorganization in 2006, we have spent considerable amounts on, among other things, building market awareness and infrastructure for sales and distribution, enhancing our engineering capabilities, perfecting an all-electric refrigeration transport system for midsize trucks, developing a 15 kW product, and developing a six-inch system capable of delivering approximately 4 kW of power. We continue to need substantial funds for the development of new products, enhancement of existing products and in order to expand sales. However, sales of our products have not increased as we expected them to and may never increase to the level that we need to expand our operations, or even to sustain them. We can provide no assurance as to when, or if, we will be profitable in the future. Even if we achieve profitability, we may not be able to sustain it.
The effects of a pandemic or widespread outbreak of an illness, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, has had and could continue to have a material adverse impact on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
The outbreak of COVID-19 was declared a pandemic by the World Health Organization (“WHO”) during our fourth quarter of Fiscal 2020 and continues to impact our operations and cash flows up to the filing date of this Annual Report for Fiscal 2022. While we have implemented measures to mitigate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, we expect our Fiscal 2023 results of operations to continue to be adversely affected by the COVID-19 pandemic.
As a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, we have experienced varying degrees of business disruptions and periods of closure of our corporate facilities, as have our customers, partners, suppliers, and vendors, as described in Item 1 - “Business - Recent Developments.” Collectively, these disruptions have had a material adverse impact on our business throughout Fiscal 2022 and Fiscal 2021. Despite the introduction of COVID-19 vaccines, the pandemic remains highly volatile and continues to evolve. Accordingly, we cannot predict for how long and to what extent this crisis will continue to impact our business operations or the global economy as a whole. Potential impacts to our business include, but are not limited to:
● our ability to successfully execute our long-term growth strategy;
● potential declines in the level of purchases of products, including our products, caused by higher unemployment and lower disposal income levels, travel and social gathering restrictions, work-from-home arrangements, or other factors beyond our control;
● our ability to generate sufficient cash flows to support our operations, including repayment of our debt obligations as they become due;
● the potential loss of one or more of our significant customers or partners, or the loss of a large number of smaller customers or partners, if they are not able to withstand prolonged periods of adverse economic conditions, and our ability to collect outstanding receivables;
● temporary closures or other operational restrictions of our facilities;
● supply chain disruptions resulting from closed factories, reduced workforces, scarcity of raw materials, and scrutiny or embargoing of goods produced in infected areas, including any related cost increases;
● our ability to access capital markets and maintain compliance with covenants associated with our existing debt instruments, as well as the ability of our key customers, suppliers, and vendors to do the same with regard to their own obligations;
● additional costs to protect the health and safety of our employees, customers, and communities, such as more frequent and thorough cleanings of our facilities and supplying personal protection equipment;
● diversion of management attention and resources from ongoing business activities and/or a decrease in employee morale; and
● our ability to maintain an effective system of internal controls and compliance with the requirements under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
Additional discussion related to the various risks and uncertainties described above is included elsewhere within this “Risk Factors” section of our Form 10-K.
We derive a substantial portion of our revenues from customers in industries susceptible to trends and factors affecting those industries, including the COVID-19 pandemic.
Our AuraGen® system is geared toward end-markets such as commercial vehicles, communications, transportation industries, and consumer and industrial equipment markets. Factors negatively affecting these industries also negatively affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. Any adverse occurrence, including industry slowdown, recession, costly or constraining regulations, excessive inflation, prolonged disruptions in one or more of our customers’ production schedules or labor disturbances, that results in significant decline in the volume of sales in these industries, or in an overall downturn in the business and operations of our customers in these industries, could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
As a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, global vehicle production has decreased, and some manufacturers have completely shut down manufacturing operations in some countries and regions, including the United States and Europe. As a result, we have experienced, and are likely to continue to experience, delays in the production and distribution of our products and the loss of sales. If the global economic effects caused by the COVID-19 pandemic continue or increase, overall customer demand may continue to decrease which could have a further adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
We will need additional capital in the future to meet our obligations and financing may not be available. During Fiscal 2022 and Fiscal 2021, the Company attempted to increase its engineering and manufacturing activities, but it still struggled with meeting its financial requirements. If we cannot obtain additional capital, we will not be able to continue our operations.
As a result of our operating losses, we have largely financed our operations through sales of our equity securities. Beginning with Fiscal 2017, the Company significantly reduced its engineering, manufacturing, sales, and marketing activities to focus on renegotiating numerous financial obligations and conserving cash. For Fiscal 2022 and Fiscal 2021, we had approximately $2.6 million negative and $1.9 million negative cash flows from operations, respectively, due primarily to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. The Company’s engineering and manufacturing activities remained limited due to our inability to increase sales and raise significant amounts of new financing. Our ability to continue as a going concern is directly dependent upon our ability to obtain additional operating capital and generating sufficient operating cash flow. The impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic have caused significant uncertainty and volatility in the credit markets and there can be no assurance that lenders or investors will make additional commitments to provide financing to us under current circumstances. As a result of the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic, we may be required to raise additional capital and our access to and cost of financing will depend on, among other things, global economic conditions, conditions in the global financing markets, the availability of sufficient amounts of financing, and our prospects. If we are unable to obtain additional funding as and when we need it, we will not be able to recommence operations or undertake our planned expansion.
There is substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.
Our independent registered public accounting firm in their report on the Company’s February 28, 2022 audited financial statements raised substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. We do not have any sufficient committed sources of capital and do not know whether additional financing will be available when needed on terms that are acceptable, if at all. This going concern statement from our independent public accounting firm may discourage some investors from purchasing our stock or providing alternative capital financing. The failure to satisfy our capital requirements will adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.
We have identified material weaknesses in our disclosure controls and procedures internal control over financial reporting. The matters involving internal controls and procedures that our management considered to be material weaknesses under the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board were: (1) ineffective controls over transactions for debt issuances to provide for review of all terms in a timely and accurate manner, to ensure reporting is in conformance with generally accepted accounting principles and properly reflected in the financial results; and (2) ineffective controls over transactions for common stock issuances and options to provide for review of all terms in a timely and accurate manner, to ensure reporting is in conformance with generally accepted accounting principles and properly reflected in the financial results. These material weaknesses resulted in the restatement of our financial statements for the year ended February 28, 2021. The Company plans to remediate the identified material weaknesses and other deficiencies and enhance our internal controls and disclosure controls over financial reporting in fiscal 2023, but there can be no guarantee that this will be accomplished.
If we do not receive additional financing when and as needed, we may not be able to continue the research, development and commercialization of our technology and products. In that case, our business and results of operations would be materially and adversely affected.
Our capital requirements have been and will continue to be significant. We will require substantial additional funds in excess of our current financial resources for research, development and commercialization of products, to obtain and maintain patents and other intellectual property rights in these technologies and products, and for working capital and other purposes, the timing and amount of which are difficult to ascertain. When and as we need additional funds, such funds may not be available on commercially reasonable terms or at all. If we cannot obtain additional funding when and as needed, our business and results of operation would be materially and adversely affected.
Our intellectual property rights are valuable, and any inability or failure to protect them could reduce the value of our products, services and brand, which would have a material adverse effect on our business.
Our patents, trademarks, and all of our other intellectual property rights are important assets for us. There are events that are outside of our control that pose a threat to our intellectual property rights. For example, effective intellectual property protection may not be available in every country in which our products and services are distributed or made available. Also, the efforts we have taken to protect our proprietary rights may not be sufficient or effective. Due to our lack of financial resources, we may not be able to adequately protect our technology portfolio or apply for new patents to extend our intellectual property portfolio. The expiration of patents in our patent portfolio may also have an adverse effect on our business. Any significant impairment of our intellectual property rights could harm our business and or our ability to compete. Protecting our intellectual property rights is costly and time consuming and we may need to resort to litigation to enforce our patent rights or to determine the scope and validity of third-party intellectual property rights and we may not have the financial resources to pay for such litigation. Some of our competitors may be able to sustain the costs of complex patent litigation more effectively than we can because they have substantially greater resources.
We seek to obtain patent protection for our innovations. It is possible, however, that some of these innovations may not be protectable. In addition, given the costs of obtaining patent protection, we may choose not to protect certain innovations that later turn out to be important. Furthermore, there is always the possibility, despite our efforts, that the scope of the protection gained will be insufficient or that an issued patent may be deemed invalid or unenforceable. Our inability or failure to protect our intellectual property rights could have a material adverse effect on our business by reducing the value of our products, services and brand.
We occasionally become subject to commercial disputes that could harm our business by distracting our management from the operation of our business, by increasing our expenses and, if we do not prevail, by subjecting us to potential monetary damages and other remedies.
From time to time, we are engaged in disputes regarding our commercial transactions. These disputes could result in monetary damages or other remedies that could adversely impact our financial position or operations. Even if we prevail in these disputes, they may distract our management from operating our business and the cost of defending these disputes would reduce our operating results.
We have been named as a party in various legal proceedings, and we may be named in additional litigation, all of which will require significant management time and attention, result in significant legal expenses and may result in an unfavorable outcome, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition.
We have been and may in the become subject to various legal proceedings and claims that arise in or outside the ordinary course of business. Certain current lawsuits and pending proceedings are described under Part I, Item 3. “Legal Proceedings.”
The results of these lawsuits and future legal proceedings cannot be predicted with certainty. Also, our insurance coverage may be insufficient or not provide any coverage at all for certain claims, our assets may be insufficient to cover any amounts that exceed our insurance coverage, and we may have to pay damage awards or otherwise may enter into settlement arrangements in connection with such claims. Any such payments or settlement arrangements in current or future litigation could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results or financial condition. Even if the plaintiffs’ claims are not successful, current future litigation could result in substantial costs and significantly and adversely impact our reputation and divert management’s attention and resources, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results or financial condition. In addition, such lawsuits may make it more difficult to finance our operations.
We have substantial indebtedness and obligations to pay interest.
We currently have, and will likely continue to have, a substantial amount of indebtedness and obligations to pay interest from various financing and settlement arrangements. Our indebtedness and interest obligations could, among other things, make it more difficult for us to satisfy our debt obligations, require us to use a large portion of our cash flow from operations to repay and service our debt or otherwise create liquidity problems, limit our flexibility to adjust to market conditions, and place us at a competitive disadvantage. As of February 28, 2022, we had total notes payable debt outstanding plus accrued interest of approximately $18.7 million, of which $18.4 million was short term.
In March 2022, the Company reached a settlement that resolves the various claims asserted against us by former director, Robert Kopple, and his affiliated entities. In July 2017, Mr. Kopple and his affiliates brought suit against the Company relating to more than $13 million and the current equivalent of more than approximately 23 million warrants, exercisable for seven years at a price of $0.10 per share, which Mr. Kopple and his affiliated entities (collectively the “Kopple Parties”) claimed to be owed to them pursuant to various agreements with the Company entered into between 2013-2016. Under the terms of the settlement, we have agreed to pay an aggregate amount of $10 million over a period of seven years; $3 million of which is to be paid within approximately three months of the settlement date, after which, interest will accrue on the unpaid balance at a rate of 6%, compounded annually. All amounts, including all accrued interest, are to be paid no later than eight years from the date of the initial payment. The Kopple Parties have also received seven-year warrants to purchase up to an aggregate of approximately 3.3 million shares of our common stock at a price of $0.85 per share. The settlement also provides for standard mutual general release provisions and includes customary representations, warranties, and covenants, including certain increases in the amount payable to the Kopple Parties and the right of such parties to enter judgment against the Company if the Company remains in uncured default in its payment obligations under the settlement. See Item 3. “Legal Proceedings”, “Liquidity and Capital Resources” in “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and Footnote 19 “Subsequent Events “in the Notes to Financial Statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional information regarding the transactions under dispute.
We expect to obtain the money to pay our expenses and pay the principal and interest on our indebtedness from cash flow from our operations and potentially from securities offerings. Accordingly, our ability to meet our obligations depends on our future performance and capital raising activities, which will be affected by financial, business, economic and other factors, many of which are beyond our control. If our cash flow and capital resources prove inadequate to allow us to pay the principal and interest on our debt and meet our other obligations, we could face substantial liquidity problems and might be required to dispose of material assets or operations, restructure or refinance our debt, which we may be unable to do on acceptable terms, and forego attractive business opportunities. In addition, the terms of our existing or future debt agreements may restrict us from pursuing any of these alternatives.
Our business is not diversified. If we cannot increase market acceptance of our products, modify our products and services, or compete with new technologies, we may never be profitable.
We currently focus all of our resources on the successful commercialization of the AuraGen® family of products. Because we have elected to focus our business on a single technology line rather than diversifying into other areas, our success will be dependent upon the commercial success of these products. If we are unable to increase market acceptance of our products, if we are unable to modify our products and services on a timely basis so that we lose customers, or if new technologies make our technology obsolete, we may never be profitable.
Most of our competitors are larger and better financed than we are and have a greater presence in the marketplace. Our business may be adversely affected by industry competition.
Both in the U.S. and internationally, the industries in which we operate are extremely competitive. We face substantial competition from companies that have a long history of offering traditional auxiliary power units (portable generators), traditional automotive alternators, and inverters (a device that inverts battery direct current electricity to alternating current). Most of our competitors have substantially greater financial resources, spend considerably larger sums than we spend on research, new product development and marketing, and have long-standing customer relationships. Furthermore, we must compete with many larger and better-established companies in the hiring and retention of qualified personnel. Although we believe we have significant technological advantages over our competitors, realizing and maintaining such advantages will require us to develop customer relationships and will also depend on market acceptance of our products. We may not have the financial resources, technical expertise, or marketing and support capabilities to compete successfully, which would materially and adversely affect our business.
We may not be able to establish an effective distribution network or strategic OEM relationships; in which case our sales will not increase as expected and our financial condition and results of operations would be adversely affected.
We are in the very beginning stages of developing our distribution network and establishing strategic relationships with original equipment manufacturer (OEM) customers. We may not be able to identify appropriate distributors or OEM customers on a timely basis. The distributors with which we partner may not focus adequate resources on selling our products or may otherwise be unsuccessful in selling them. In addition, we cannot assure you that we will be able to establish OEM relationships on favorable terms or at all. The lack of success of distributors or OEM customers in marketing our products would adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.
If we are successful in executing our business plan to grow our business, our failure to efficiently manage our growth could have an adverse effect on our business.
If we are successful in executing our business plan, we may experience growth in our business that could place a significant strain on our management and other resources. Our ability to manage this growth will require us to successfully assimilate new employees, improve existing management information systems and reorganize our operations. If we fail to manage growth efficiently, our business could be adversely affected.
We may experience delays in product shipments and increased product costs because we depend on third party manufacturers for certain product components. Delays in product shipment or an inability to replace certain suppliers could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.
We currently do not have the capability to manufacture most of the AuraGen® components on a commercial scale. Therefore, we rely extensively on contracts with third party manufacturers for such components. The use of third-party manufacturers increases the risk of delay of shipments to our customers and increases the risk of higher costs if our manufacturers are not available when required. Our suppliers and manufacturers may not supply us with a sufficient number of components or components of adequate quality, which would delay production of our product. We do not currently have written agreements with any suppliers. Furthermore, those suppliers who make certain components may not be easily replaced. Any of these disruptions in the supply of components could have a material adverse effect on our business or results of operations. Furthermore, we are monitoring the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the operations of the Company, particularly with respect to possible delays and other disruptions to the supply-chain.
Although we generally aim to use standard parts and components for our products, some of our components are currently available only from limited sources.
We may experience delays in production of the AuraGen® if we fail to identify alternate vendors, or if any parts supply is interrupted or reduced or if there is a significant increase in production costs, each of which could materially adversely and affect our business and operations.
We will need to renew sources of component supplies to meet increases in demand for the AuraGen®. There is no assurance that our suppliers can or will supply the components to us on favorable terms or at all.
As we recommence our operations and in order to meet future demand for AuraGen® systems, we will need to renew contracts or form new contracts with our prior manufacturers and suppliers or locate other suitable manufacturers and suppliers for subassemblies and other components. Recently, we entered into discussions with several of our prior suppliers and we are in the process of negotiating settlements of old payables and arranging new supply contracts. Although we believe that there are a number of potential manufacturers and suppliers of the components, we cannot guarantee that contracts for components can be obtained on favorable terms or at all. Any material adverse change in terms of the purchase of these components could increase our cost of goods.
We need to invest in tooling to have a more extensive line of products. If we cannot expand our tooling, it may not be possible for us to expand our operations.
We are currently limited in the products that we are able to manufacture because of the limitations of our tooling capabilities. In order to have a broader line of products that address industrial and commercial needs, we must make a significant investment in additional tooling or pursue new alternatives to replace traditional tooling. We do not currently have the funds required to acquire new tooling or to obtain replacements and no assurances can be given that we will have the required funds in the future. If we do not acquire the required funds for tooling or replacement tooling, we may not be able to expand our product line to meet industrial and commercial needs.
We are subject to government regulation that may restrict our ability to use certain suppliers outside the U.S. or to sell our products into certain countries. If we cannot obtain the required approval from government agencies, then our business may be adversely affected.
We depend on third party suppliers for our parts and components, some of which are located outside of the United States. In the event that some of these suppliers are barred from selling their products in the United States, or cannot meet other U.S. government regulations, we would need to locate other suppliers, which could delay or prevent us from shipping product to our customers. We use copper, steel and aluminum in our product and in the event of government regulations or restrictions of these materials we may experience a shortage of these materials to manufacture our product. Furthermore, U.S. law restricts us from selling products in some potential foreign markets without U.S. government approval. If we cannot obtain the required approvals from government agencies to obtain materials or contract with suppliers or if we are restricted by government regulation from selling our products into certain countries, our business may be adversely affected.
Acquisitions, joint ventures, and strategic alliances may have an adverse effect on our business.
In March 2017, we entered into a joint venture agreement with a Chinese partner. This joint venture arrangement and other transactions and arrangements involve significant challenges and risks, including that they do not advance our business strategy, that we get an unsatisfactory return on our investment, that we have difficulty integrating and retaining new employees, business systems, and technology, or that they distract management from our other businesses. If an arrangement fails to adequately anticipate changing circumstances and interests of a party, it may result in early termination or renegotiation of the arrangement. The success of these transactions and arrangements will depend in part on our ability to leverage them to enhance our existing products and services or develop compelling new ones. It may take longer than expected to realize the full benefits from these transactions and arrangements, such as increased revenue, enhanced efficiencies, or increased market share, or the benefits may ultimately be smaller than we expected. These events could adversely affect our operating results or financial condition. During Fiscal 2020, the Company recorded an impairment expense of $250,000 writing-off the Jiangsu Shengfeng investment due to operational and future cash-flow uncertainties associated with AuraGen® market development prospects in China through the joint venture.
We rely on highly skilled personnel and, if we are unable to retain or motivate key personnel or hire qualified personnel, we may not be able to grow effectively.
Our performance is largely dependent on the talents and efforts of highly skilled individuals. Our future success depends on our continuing ability to identify, hire, develop, motivate, and retain highly skilled personnel for all areas of our organization. We are currently in default under several agreements with various key consultants which may make those parties unwilling to continue to work with the Company. Our continued ability to compete effectively depends on our ability to attract new employees and to retain and motivate our existing employees and consultants. The incentives to attract, retain and motivate employees and consultants provided by our ability to pay competitive salaries and rates as well as offering additional incentives such as stock option grants or by future arrangements may not be as effective as in the past. If we do not succeed in attracting excellent personnel or retaining or motivating existing personnel, we may be unable to grow effectively.
Our business is subject to the risks of earthquakes and other natural catastrophic events, and to interruptions by man-made problems such as computer viruses, terrorism, or pandemics.
Our corporate headquarters and our research and development operations are located in the State of California in regions known for seismic activity. A significant natural disaster, such as an earthquake, in this region could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, our servers are vulnerable to computer viruses, break-ins, and similar disruptions from unauthorized tampering with our computer systems. Any such event could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Failure to maintain effective internal controls over financial reporting could adversely affect our business and the market price of our Common Stock.
Pursuant to rules adopted by the SEC under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we are required to assess the effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting and provide a management report on our internal controls over financial reporting in all annual reports. This report contains, among other matters, a statement as to whether our internal controls over financial reporting are effective and the disclosure of any material weaknesses in our internal controls over financial reporting identified by management. Section 404 also requires our independent registered public accounting firm to audit the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting.
As described in ITEM 9A, Controls and Procedures contained herein in this Annual Report, we have concluded that the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting are not effective for the Fiscal year ended February 28, 2022 and have identified a material weakness in our financial reporting internal controls. The Company plans to remediate the material weakness in fiscal 2023, but there is no guarantee that this will be accomplished. Presently, the Company does not have the financial resources to fully comply with all requirements of Section 404. If, in the future, we identify one or more material weaknesses in our internal controls over financial reporting during this continuous evaluation process, our management may not be able to assert that such internal controls are effective. Therefore, if we are unable to assert that our internal controls over financial reporting are effective in the future, or if our auditors are unable to attest that our internal controls are effective or they are unable to express an opinion on the effectiveness of our internal controls, we could lose investor confidence in the accuracy and completeness of our financial reports, which would have an adverse effect on our business and the market price of our Common Stock.
Trading on the OTC Markets is volatile and sporadic, which could depress the market price of our common stock and make it difficult for our stockholders to resell their shares.
Our common stock is quoted on the Pink Sheets of the OTC Markets. Trading in stock quoted on the OTC Markets is often thin and characterized by wide fluctuations in trading prices, due to many factors, some of which may have little to do with our operations or business prospects. This volatility could depress the market price of our common stock for reasons unrelated to operating performance. Moreover, the OTC Markets is not a stock exchange, and trading of securities on the OTC Markets is often more sporadic than the trading of securities listed on a quotation system like NASDAQ or a stock exchange like the New York Stock Exchange. These factors may result in investors having difficulty reselling any shares of our common stock.

---

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
None

---

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
During Fiscal 2021, our facilities consisted primarily of approximately 20,000 shared square feet in Stanton, California and an additional storage facility in Santa Clarita, California. The Stanton facility previously was used for final assembly and testing of AuraGen®/VIPER systems under a month-to-month rental agreement for $10,000 per month. The monthly rent for the Santa Clarita storage facility that was terminated effective July 31, 2020 was also under a month-to-month rental agreement for $5,000 per month. Following the exit from the Santa Clarita facility to February 28, 2021, we rented temporary storage space through February 28, 2021 for $2,500 per month. Effective February 28, 2021, we vacated the Stanton facility and consolidated our administrative offices, operations including warehousing space within an approximately 18,000 square feet facility in Lake Forest, California under a rental agreement that commenced on February 15, 2021 and covers a 66-month rental period effective from February 2021 through August 31, 2026.

---

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
We are subject to the legal proceedings and claims discussed below as well as certain other legal proceedings and claims that have not been fully resolved and that have arisen in the ordinary course of business. Our management evaluates our exposure to these claims and proceedings individually and in the aggregate and evaluates potential losses on such litigation if the amount of the loss is estimable and the loss is probable. However, the outcome of legal proceedings and claims brought against the Company is subject to significant uncertainty. Although management considers the likelihood of such an outcome to be remote, if one or more of these legal matters were resolved against the Company for amounts in excess of management’s expectations, the Company’s financial statements for that reporting period could be materially adversely affected. The Company settled certain matters subsequent to year end that did not individually or in the aggregate have a material impact on the Company’s financial condition or operating results.
In 2017, the Company’s former COO was awarded approximately $238,000 in accrued salary and related charges by the California labor board. In August 2021, the Company reached a settlement by which the Company agreed to pay approximately $330,000, representing the principal award plus accrued interest. As of the time of this filing, the Company has paid approximately $108,400 toward the settlement amount. The remaining balance of approximately $221,600 is to be paid no later than September 1, 2022, and accrues interest of 10% per annum until paid.
Since July 2017 the Company has been engaged in litigation with a former director, Robert Kopple, relating to more than $13 million and the current equivalent of the approximately 23 million warrants, exercisable for seven years at a price of $0.10 per share, which Mr. Kopple and his affiliated entities (collectively the “Kopple Parties”) claimed should have been originally issued to them pursuant to various agreements with the Company entered to between 2013-2016. In March 2022, the Company reached a settlement with the Kopple Parties that resolves all claims asserted against the Company without any admission, concession or finding of any fault, liability or wrongdoing on the part of the Company. Under the terms of the settlement, we have agreed to pay an aggregate amount of $10 million over a period of seven years; $3 million of which is to be paid on or before June 8, 2022, after which, interest will accrue on the unpaid balance at a rate of 6%, compounded annually. All amounts, including all accrued interest, are to be paid no later than eight years from the date of the initial payment. The Kopple Parties have also received seven-year warrants to purchase up to an aggregate of approximately 3.3 million shares of our common stock at a price of $0.85 per share. The settlement also provides for standard mutual general release provisions and includes customary representations, warranties, and covenants, including certain increases in the amount payable to the Kopple Parties and the right of such parties to enter judgment against the Company if the Company remains in uncured default in its payment obligations under the settlement. As of June 8, 2022 and the date of this report, the Company has not yet paid the $3,000,000 installment due to Kopple. Pursuant to the agreement, the Company has 60 days to cure the nonpayment of the $3,000,000 default. (See Part IV, Item 15, Note 19 to the Financial Statements).
On March 26, 2019, various stockholders of the Company controlling a combined total of more than 27.5 million shares delivered a signed written consent to the Company removing Ronald Buschur as a member of the Company’s Board and electing Cipora Lavut as a director of the Company. On March 27, 2019, those same stockholders delivered a further signed written consent to the Company removing William Anderson and Si Ryong Yu as members of the Company’s Board and electing Robert Lempert and David Mann as directors of the Company. These written consents represented a majority of the outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock as of March 26, 2019 and March 27, 2019, respectively. Because of Aura’s refusal to recognize the legal effectiveness of the consents, on April 8, 2019 the stockholders filed suit in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware pursuant to Section 225 of the Delaware General Corporations Law, seeking an order confirming the validity of the consents and declaring that Aura’s Board consists of Ms. Lavut, Mr. Mann, Dr. Lempert, Mr. Douglas and Mr. Diaz-Versón, Jr. On July 8, 2019 the Court of Chancery entered final judgment in favor of the stockholder plaintiffs, confirming that (a) Ronald Buschur, Si Ryong Yu and William Anderson had been validly removed by the holders of a majority of the Company’s outstanding stock acting by written consent (b) Ms. Lavut, Mr. Mann and Dr. Lempert had been validly elected by the holders of a majority of the Company’s outstanding stock acting by written consent, and (c) the Company’s Board of Directors validly consists of Cipora Lavut, David Mann, Robert Lempert, Gary Douglas and Salvador Diaz-Versón, Jr. As a result of prior management’s unsuccessful opposition to this stockholders’ action filed in the Court of Chancery, such stockholders may be potentially entitled to recoup their litigation costs from the Company under Delaware’s corporate benefit doctrine and/or other legal provisions. To-date, no final determination has been made as to the amount of recoupment, if any, to which such stockholders may be entitled.
On June 20, 2013, the Company entered into an agreement with two individuals, Mr. M. Abdou and Mr. W. Abdou, for the sale of $125,000 of secured convertible notes payable (the “Notes”) and warrants. In 2016, the Company and the Company’s former Chief Executive Officer, Melvin Gagerman, were named among several other defendants in a lawsuit filed by the Messrs. Abdou demanding repayment of loans totaling $125,000 plus accrued interest and exemplary damages. In January 2017, the Company entered into an agreement with all secured creditors other than Mr. W. Abdou and Mr. M. Abdou. In September 2018 the court entered a judgment of approximately $235,000 plus legal fees in favor of the Messrs. Abdou. The Company subsequently appealed this judgment and, in September 2019, reached a settlement agreement with the Messrs. Abdou to implement a payment plan in accordance with the 2018 judgment. As of February 28, 2022 the outstanding principal balance was zero and remaining interest was approximately $18,000. As of the date of this filing, all amounts have been paid and no principal or interest remains outstanding.

---

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURE
ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
Not applicable.
PART II

---

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
Our shares are quoted on the Pink Sheets operated by OTC Markets, Inc. under the symbol “AUSI”. Set forth below are high and low bid prices for our common stock for each quarterly period in the two most recent Fiscal years. Such quotations reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, markdown or commissions and may not necessarily represent actual transactions in the common stock. We had approximately 3,400 stockholders of record as of May 13, 2022.
Period High Low
Fiscal 2022
First Quarter ended May 31, 2021 $ 0.52 $ 0.24
Second Quarter ended August 31, 2021 $ 0.58 $ 0.23
Third Quarter ended November 30, 2021 $ 0.73 $ 0.38
Fourth Quarter ended February 28, 2022 $ 0.80 $ 0.22
Fiscal 2021
First Quarter ended May 31, 2020 $ 0.24 $ 0.08
Second Quarter ended August 31, 2020 $ 0.12 $ 0.09
Third Quarter ended November 30, 2020 $ 0.12 $ 0.06
Fourth Quarter ended February 28, 2021 $ 0.51 $ 0.12
On June 13, 2022, the reported closing sales price for our common stock was $0.299.
Dividend Policy
We have not paid any dividends on our common stock and we do not anticipate paying any dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future.
Sales of Unregistered Securities
During the year ended February 28, 2022, we issued approximately 12,016,000 shares of common stock, for a total of $3,276,330 inclusive of approximately 1,571,000 and 245,000 shares of common stock in settlement of $550,000 of debt and $73,500 for services, respectively.
During the year ended February 28, 2021, we issued 14,513,963 shares of common stock for a total of $2,249,909, inclusive of 415,636 shares of common stock in settlement of $103,909 of debt.
Funds raised were for general corporate working capital purposes. All such securities were issued and sold in reliance on the exemption from registration contained in Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, and the certificates representing such securities contain a restrictive legend reflecting the limitations on future transfer of those securities. The offer and sale of these securities was made without public solicitation or advertising. The investors represented to us that they were knowledgeable and sophisticated and were experienced in business and financial matters so as to be capable of evaluating an investment in our securities and were an “accredited investor” within the meaning of Regulation D promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933. Each of these investors was afforded full access to information regarding our business.
Repurchases of Equity Securities
We did not repurchase any shares of our common stock during the fiscal years ended February 28, 2022 and February 28, 2021.

---

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
ITEM 6. [Reserved]
As a smaller reporting company, we are not required to provide disclosure under this Item 6.

---

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Forward Looking Statements.
This Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations includes forward-looking statements. For cautions about relying on such forward-looking statements, please refer to the section entitled “Forward Looking Statements” at the beginning of this Report immediately prior to “Item 1”.
Overview
Our business is based on the exploitation of our Axial Flux Induction solution known as the AuraGen® for commercial and industrial applications and the VIPER for military applications. Our business model consists of two major components: (i) sales and marketing, (ii) design and engineering. Our sales and marketing approaches are composed of direct sales in North America and the use of agents and distributors in other areas. In North America, our primary focus is in (a) mobile exportable power applications, (b) EV applications, (c) U.S. Military applications and (d) industrial applications. The second component of our business model is focused on the design of new products and engineering support for the sales activities described above. The engineering support consists of the introduction of new features for our AuraGen®/VIPER solution such as higher power/torque solutions, and different input and output voltages (DC and AC input and output versions).
In Fiscal 2020 stockholders of the Company successfully removed Ronald Buschur, William Anderson and Si Ryong Yu from the Company’s Board of Directors and elected Ms. Cipora Lavut, Mr. David Mann and Dr. Robert Lempert as directors of the Company in their stead. See Item 3, Legal Proceedings for more information. Also, in Fiscal 2020, Melvin Gagerman -- Aura’s CEO and CFO since 2006 -- was replaced. In July 2019 Ms. Lavut succeeded Mr. Gagerman as President and Mr. Mann succeeded Mr. Gagerman as CFO. Dr. Lempert was appointed as Secretary of the Company by the Board of Directors also in July 2019. In the second half of Fiscal 2020, the Company began significantly increasing its engineering, manufacturing and marketing activities. From July 8, 2019 through the end of Fiscal year 2022 (February 28, 2022), we shipped more than 140 units to customers (more than a ten-fold increase over Fiscal 2019). Although our operations were impacted in Fiscal 2022 and Fiscal 2021 by the COVID-19 pandemic, during these periods we continued to expand our engineering and manufacturing capabilities. See “Item 1. Business. Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic” included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for information regarding the impact of COVID-19 on our operations. Our engineering, research and development costs for Fiscal 2022 and Fiscal 2021 were approximately $611,000 and $237,000, respectively. Subsequent to the end of Fiscal 2021, we relocated all administrative offices and operations to a new state-of-the-art facility consisting of approximately 18,000 square feet in Lake Forest, California. This new facility is wholly occupied by Aura.
During Fiscal 2018 and Fiscal 2019, the Company’s engineering, manufacturing, sales, and marketing activities were reduced while we focused on renegotiating numerous financial obligations. During this time, the Company’s agreements with numerous customers, third party vendors, and organizations and entities material to the operation of the Company business were canceled, delayed or terminated. During Fiscal 2018, the Company successfully restructured in excess of $30 million of debt. Robert Kopple, our former Vice Chairman of the Board, was the only significant unsecured note holder that did not executed formal agreements regarding the restructure of his debt. See “Item 3. Legal Proceedings” included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for information regarding the dispute with Mr. Kopple regarding these transactions. In March 2022, the Company reached a settlement that resolves the various claims asserted against us by Mr. Kopple and his affiliated entities. In July 2017, Mr. Kopple and his affiliates brought suit against the Company relating to more than $13 million and the current equivalent of more than approximately 23 million warrants, exercisable for seven years at a price of $0.10 per share, which Mr. Kopple and his affiliated entities (collectively the “Kopple Parties”) claimed to be owed to them pursuant to various agreements with the Company entered into between 2013-2016. Under the terms of the settlement, we have agreed to pay an aggregate amount of $10 million over a period of seven years; $3 million of which is to be paid within approximately three months of the settlement date, after which, interest will accrue on the unpaid balance at a rate of 6%, compounded annually. All amounts, including all accrued interest, are to be paid no later than eight years from the date of the initial payment. The Kopple Parties have also received seven-year warrants to purchase up to an aggregate of approximately 3.3 million shares of our common stock at a price of $0.85 per share. The settlement also provides for standard mutual general release provisions and includes customary representations, warranties, and covenants, including certain increases in the amount payable to the Kopple Parties and the right of such parties to enter judgment against the Company if the Company remains in uncured default in its payment obligations under the settlement. (See Part IV, Item 15, Note 19 to the Financial Statements)
In Fiscal 2019, we effectuated a one-for-seven reverse stock split and began increasing our engineering and manufacturing activities. We incurred engineering expenses of approximately $494,000 during Fiscal 2019. Most corporate operations were temporarily suspended, however, in Fiscal 2020 when the Company’s then-management team reallocated significant resources to unsuccessfully oppose an action by shareholders controlling a majority of the outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock to replace certain members of the Company’s Board of Directors. On July 8, 2019 the Delaware Court of Chancery entered final judgment confirming the validity of this stockholder action. See Item 3, Legal Proceedings for more information. As a result, during Fiscal 2020 we incurred only modest engineering expenses of approximately $172,000 (representing a reduction of approximately 65% from the prior fiscal year). Also, in Fiscal 2020, Melvin Gagerman -- Aura’s CEO and CFO since 2006 -- was replaced.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Our management’s discussion and analysis of our financial conditions and results of operations are based upon our financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of financial statements requires management to make estimates and disclosures on the date of the financial statements. In preparing our financial statements, we have made our best estimates and judgments of certain amounts included in the financial statements. We use authoritative pronouncements, historical experience and other assumptions as the basis for making judgments. The full impact of the COVID-19 pandemic is unknown and cannot be reasonably estimated for these key estimates and assumptions. However, we made appropriate accounting estimates based on the facts and circumstances available as of the reporting date. To the extent that there are differences between these estimates and actual results, our financial statements may be materially affected.
Revenue Recognition
The Company recognizes revenue in accordance with Financial Accounting Standard Board’s (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. To determine revenue recognition under ASC 606, an entity performs the following five-steps (i) identifies the contract(s) with a customer; (ii) identifies the performance obligations in the contract; (iii) determines the transaction price; (iv) allocates the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract; and (v) recognizes revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies a performance obligation. The Company only applies the five-steps to contracts when it is probable that the entity will collect the consideration it is entitled to in exchange for the goods or services it transfers to the customer.
In accordance with ASC 606, we recognize revenue, net of discounts, for our generator sets at time of product delivery to the domestic distributor (i.e. point-in-time), which also corresponds to the passage of legal title to the customer and the satisfaction of our performance obligations to the customer. Our payment terms are cash payment due upon delivery and typically includes a 2% price discount off the selling price in accordance with this policy. Our commercial terms and conditions do not include a right of return for reasons other than a defect in performance or quality. We offer a 24 month assurance-type warranty covering material and manufacturing defects, which we account for under the guidance of ASC 460, Guarantee.
Inventories
Inventories are valued at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out) or net realizable value, on an average cost basis. We review the components of inventory on a regular basis for excess or obsolete inventory based on estimated future usage and sales. When evidence exists that the net realizable value of inventory is lower than its cost, the difference is recognized as a loss in the period in which it occurs. Once inventory has been written down, it creates a new cost basis for inventory that may not be subsequently written up.
Leases
The Company determines whether a contract is, or contains, a lease at inception. Right-of-use assets represent the Company’s right to use an underlying asset during the lease term, and lease liabilities represent the Company’s obligation to make lease payments arising from the lease. Right-of-use assets and lease liabilities are recognized at lease commencement based upon the estimated present value of unpaid lease payments over the lease term. The Company uses its incremental borrowing rate based on the information available at lease commencement in determining the present value of unpaid lease payments.
Share-Based Compensation
The Company periodically issues stock options and warrants, and shares of common stock to employees and non-employees in non-capital raising transactions for services and for financing costs. Share-based compensation cost is measured at the grant date, based on the estimated fair value of the award, and is recognized as expense over the requisite service period. Recognition of compensation expense for non-employees is in the same period and manner as if the Company had paid cash for services. The Company periodically issues stock options and warrants, and shares of common stock to employees and non-employees in non-capital raising transactions for services and for financing costs. Share-based compensation cost is measured at the grant date, based on the estimated fair value of the award, and is recognized as expense over the requisite service period. Recognition of compensation expense for non-employees is in the same period and manner as if the Company had paid cash for services.
Derivative Financial Instruments
The Company evaluates its financial instruments to determine if such instruments are derivatives or contain features that qualify as embedded derivatives. For derivative financial instruments that are accounted for as liabilities, the derivative instrument is initially recorded at its fair value and is then re-valued at each reporting date, with changes in the fair value reported in the statements of operations. The classification of derivative instruments, including whether such instruments should be recorded as liabilities or as equity, is evaluated at the end of each reporting period. Derivative instrument liabilities are classified in the balance sheet as current or non-current based on whether or not net-cash settlement of the derivative instrument could be required within 12 months of the balance sheet date.
The Company uses Level 2 inputs for its valuation methodology for the derivative liabilities as their fair values were determined by using a Binomial pricing model. The Company’s derivative liabilities are adjusted to reflect fair value at each period end, with any increase or decrease in the fair value being recorded in the statement of operations.
COVID-19
The COVID-19 global pandemic has negatively affected the global economy, disrupted global supply chains, and created extreme volatility and disruptions to capital and credit markets in the global financial markets. We began to see the impact of COVID-19 during our fourth quarter of Fiscal 2020 with our Chinese joint venture’s manufacturing facilities being required to close and many of our customers suspending their own operations due to the COVID-19 pandemic. As a result, net sales and production levels during the fourth quarter of Fiscal 2020, Fiscal 2021 and Fiscal 2022 were significantly reduced, thus impacting our results of operations during these periods.
In response to the COVID-19 pandemic and business disruption, we implemented certain measures to manage costs, preserve liquidity and enhance employee safety. These measures included the following:
● Reduction of payroll costs through temporary furloughs;
● Enhanced cleaning and disinfection procedures at our facilities, temperature checks for our workers, promotion of social distancing at our facilities and requirements for employees to work from home where possible;
● Reduction of capital expenditures; and
● Deferral of discretionary spending.
The extent of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on our business, financial results and liquidity will depend largely on future developments, including the duration of the spread of the COVID-19 outbreak within the U.S. and globally, the impact on capital and financial markets and the related impact on our customers, especially in the commercial vehicle markets. These future developments are outside of our control, are highly uncertain, and cannot be predicted. If the impact is prolonged, then it can further increase the difficulty of planning for operations and may require us to take further actions as it relates to costs and liquidity. These and other potential impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic will continue to adversely impact our results for the first quarter of Fiscal 2023, as well as the full Fiscal year, and that impact could be material.
Results of Operations
Fiscal 2022 compared to Fiscal 2021
Revenues
Revenues in Fiscal 2022 were approximately $100,000 as compared to the Fiscal 2021 period of approximately $115,000, a reduction of approximately 13%. Fiscal 2022 revenues consisted principally of the delivery of 8 AurtaGen®/VIPER systems, including the initial units of the Company’s new design. Fiscal 2021 consisted of the delivery of 20 AuraGen®/VIPER units. We believe that the low levels of revenue in both Fiscal 2022 and Fiscal 2021 were the result of being impacted significantly by the COVID-19 pandemic and its impact on the global economy.
Cost of Goods
Cost of goods sold was approximately $124,000 and $81,000 in the years ended February 28, 2022 and February 28, 2021, respectively. During Fiscal 2022, we benefited from the utilization of fully reserved inventory to deliver 8 units and recorded material cost at 31% of sales value, direct labor at 41% of sales value and other overheads at 16% of sales. Additionally, the Company recorded an inventory write-down of $36,000 to cost of goods sold, which resulted in a negative gross margin of approximately $24,000 in Fiscal 2022. During Fiscal 2021, we benefited from the utilization of fully reserved inventory to deliver 20 units and recorded material cost at 25% of sales value, direct labor at 45% of sales value and other overheads at 3% of sales. The increase in direct material costs as a percentage of sales in FY2022 is partly attributable to the costs associated with newly acquired inventory for the Company’s upgraded ECU design. While both the FY 2022 and FY 2021 periods benefited from the utilization of inventory that was previously fully reserved, the new design units fabricated in FY2022 did include the costs of new electronics boards. As production levels increase over time, the amount of recoverable inventory will decline and the amount of direct material recorded within cost of goods sold will increase, reducing the gross profit contribution of units of sales.
Engineering, Research and Development
Engineering, research and development costs increased to approximately $611,000 in Fiscal 2022 from approximately $237,000 in Fiscal 2021. The approximately 158% increase is a result of (i) successfully recruiting a new Chief Scientist to drive the Company’s augmented engineering activities; (ii) increased expenses incurred in the process of designing, fabricating and testing the new version of our electronic control unit (“ECU”) for our AuraGen®/VIPER products; as well as (iii) sustaining engineering expenses related to the expansion of manufacturing capability.
Selling, General and Administrative Expense
Selling, general and administrative expenses increased approximately $1,218,000, or 77%%, to $2,795,000 in Fiscal 2022 from $1,577,000 in Fiscal 2021 due to several factors. Most notable of these were (i) increased net occupancy related costs of approximately $266,000 including some residual expenses related to the moving costs for consolidation of operations into the new facility in Lake Forest, CA (ii) increased stock-based compensation expense of $160,000 related to the vesting schedule of stock options granted to members of the Board of Directors and advisors to the Board in FY 2021 (iii) increased legal fees of $488,000 principally for the Koppel matter and (iv) increased employee related expenses of $185,000 primarily associated with the Company’s efforts to increase global sales to offset some of the effects of the pandemic.
Non-Operating Income, Interest Expense and Tax Provision
Net interest expense decreased slightly to approximately $1,272,000 in Fiscal 2022 from approximately $1,280,000 in Fiscal 2021, a decrease of $8,000, or 0.6%, on approximately $11.2 and $11.2 million of principal amounts due at February 28, 2022 and February 28, 2021, respectively. During Fiscal 2022, the Company recorded other income of approximately $167,000 for the forgiveness of principal and accrued interest on two Payroll Protection Program (“PPP”) loans. The PPP loans provided for up to 100% forgiveness of the debt if the proceeds were used for specifically authorized expenditures. Both of the PPP loans were forgiven at 100% of principal plus accrued interest. In Fiscal 2021, we recorded other income of approximately $3.6 million on debt settlements of $0.7 million of notes payable and cancellation of liabilities of $2.7 million following the expiration of the statute of limitations for settlement.
Net Income (loss)
We recorded a net loss of approximately $3,992,000 and net income of approximately $45,000 in the Fiscal years ended February 28, 2022 and February 28, 2021, respectively, or a decrease of income of approximately $4,037,000 due to several factors: (i) Fiscal 2021 included gain on debt settlement of approximately $733,000 (ii) approximately $2,683,000 gain related to the Fiscal 2021 cancellation of current liabilities due to the expiration of the statute of limitations (iii) increased engineering and R&D expenses of approximately $373,000 in Fiscal 2022 (iv) increased operating expenses in selling, marketing and general and administrative of approximately $1,058,000 in Fiscal 2022 and (v) higher non-cash stock-based compensation expenses of approximately $160,000 in FY 2022.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
For the year ended February 28, 2022, we recorded a net loss of approximately $4.0 million and used cash in operations of approximately $2.6 million and at February 28, 2022, had a stockholders’ deficit of approximately $21.2 million, and approximately $13 million of notes payable-related parties payable were in default as of that date. These conditions raise substantial doubt regarding our ability to continue as a going concern for a period of at least one year from the date of issuance of these financial statements. In addition the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, in their report on the Company’s February 28, 2022, audited financial statements, raised substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.
The net loss in Fiscal 2022 as compared to the Fiscal 2021 net income was due to Fiscal 2021 having $3.5 million of non-cash gains on the cancellation of current liabilities and certain debt instruments. Fiscal 2022 also included additional expenditures to ramp up the Company’s engineering, R&D, selling and administrative activities. A significant factor in both periods contributing to the negative operating cash flows is the low level of operating activities caused principally by the COVID-19 pandemic. As a result of the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic, we may be required to raise additional capital and our access to and cost of financing will depend on, among other things, global economic conditions, conditions in the global financing markets, the availability of sufficient amounts of financing, and our future prospects.
At February 28, 2022, we had cash of approximately $150,000, compared to cash of approximately $391,000 at February 28, 2021. Subsequent to February 28, 2022, the Company issued 1,153,666 shares of common stock in exchange for cash proceeds of $346,100. In addition, subsequent to February 28, 2022, the Company reached an agreement with a related party note holder (Kopple) to resolve all litigation between them related to notes payable and accrued interest of $12.1 million. Working capital deficit at February 28, 2022 was a $21.7 million deficit as compared to an $15.5 million deficit at the end of the prior fiscal year. The principal reasons for the increase in the deficit were the reclassification of $4.4 million in convertible notes payable from long-term to current liabilities and approximately $0.8 million in additional interest accrued on the related party note payable with Mr. Kopple. At February 28, 2022 and February 28, 2021, we had no accounts receivable.
Prior to fiscal 2020, in order to maintain liquidity, we relied upon external sources of financing, principally equity financing and private indebtedness. We have no bank line of credit and will require additional debt or equity financing to fund ongoing operations. Based on a cash flow analysis performed by management, we estimate that we will need an additional $5 million to maintain existing operations for fiscal 2023 and increase the volume of shipments to customers. We cannot assure the reader that additional financing will be available nor that the commercial targets will be met in the amounts required to keep the business operating. The issuance of additional shares of equity in connection with such financing could dilute the interests of our existing stockholders, and such dilution could be substantial. If we cannot raise the needed funds, we would also be forced to make further substantial reductions in our operating expenses, which could adversely affect our ability to implement our current business plan and ultimately our viability as a company.
Since July 2017 the Company has been engaged in litigation with a former director, Robert Kopple, relating to approximately $13 million of notes payables and the current equivalent of the approximately 23 million warrants, exercisable for seven years at a price of $0.10 per share, which Mr. Kopple and his affiliated entities (collectively the “Kopple Parties”) claimed should have been originally issued to them pursuant to various agreements with the Company entered to between 2013-2016. In March 2022, the Company reached a settlement with the Kopple Parties that resolves all claims asserted against the Company without any admission, concession or finding of any fault, liability or wrongdoing on the part of the Company. Under the terms of the settlement, we have agreed to pay an aggregate amount of $10 million over a period of seven years; $3 million of which is to be paid on or before June 8, 2022, after which, interest will accrue on the unpaid balance at a rate of 6%, compounded annually. All amounts, including all accrued interest, are to be paid no later than eight years from the date of the initial payment. The Kopple Parties have also received seven-year warrants to purchase up to an aggregate of approximately 3.3 million shares of our common stock at a price of $0.85 per share. The settlement also provides for standard mutual general release provisions and includes customary representations, warranties, and covenants, including certain increases in the amount payable to the Kopple Parties and the right of such parties to enter judgment against the Company if the Company remains in uncured default in its payment obligations under the settlement. As of June 8, 2022 and the date of this report, the Company has not yet paid the $3,000,000 installment due to Kopple. Pursuant to the agreement, the Company has 60 days to cure the nonpayment of the $3,000,000 default. (See Part IV, Item 15, Note 19 to the Financial Statements).
We consider the transactions described above with Mr. Kopple to be related party transactions.
See “Item 3. Legal Proceedings” and “Part IV, Item 15, Note 19 to the Financial Statements” included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for information regarding the dispute and settlement with Mr. Kopple regarding these transactions.

---

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
As a smaller reporting company, we are not required to provide the information required by this Item 7A.

---

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
See Index to Financial Statements at page.

---

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
The disclosure with respect to the change in our accountants required under this section was previously reported as such term is defined in Rule 12b-2 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, on a Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 15, 2022. As previously disclosed, there were no disagreements or any reportable events to disclose.

---

ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We conducted an evaluation under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures. The term “disclosure controls and procedures”, as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (“Exchange Act”), means controls and other procedures of a company that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the company in the reports it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures also include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by a company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the company’s management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Based on this evaluation, our President and Chief Financial Officer concluded as of February 28, 2022, that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective. The matters involving internal controls and procedures that our management considered to be material weaknesses under the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board were: (1) ineffective controls over transactions for debt issuances to provide for review of all terms in a timely and accurate manner, to ensure reporting is in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles and properly reflected in the financial results; and (2) ineffective controls over transactions for issuances of common stock, options, and warrants to provide for review of all terms in a timely and accurate manner, to ensure reporting is in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles and properly reflected in the financial results. These material weaknesses resulted in the restatement of our financial statements for the year ended February 28, 2021. The aforementioned material weaknesses were identified by our Chief Financial Officer in connection with the review of our financial statements as of February 28, 2022.
Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
The Company’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The Company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles. Internal control over financial reporting includes policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the Company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisitions, use or disposition of the Company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Management has assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of February 28, 2022. In making these assessments, management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”) in Internal Control-Integrated Framework. Based on these assessments, and on those criteria, the Company’s management concluded that as of February 28, 2022, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was not effective to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
Remediation Plan
In an effort to remediate the identified material weaknesses and other deficiencies and enhance our internal controls, we have initiated, or plan to initiate, the following series of measures:
We have increased our personnel resources and technical accounting expertise within the accounting function with the hiring of a new Chief Financial Officer as disclosed on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 17, 2022. We intend to hire one or more additional personnel for the finance and accounting function which will provide the manpower to perform timely and complete reviews of debt and equity transactions consistent with control objectives. We also plan to prepare written policies and procedures for accounting and financial reporting to establish a formal process to account for all transactions, including equity and debt transactions. We plan to test our updated controls and remediate our deficiencies in the fiscal year 2023.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Company’s fiscal year ended February 28, 2022, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
Inherent Limitations on Effectiveness of Controls
The Company does not expect that its disclosure controls and procedures or its internal control over financial reporting will prevent all errors and all fraud. A control procedure, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable not absolute assurance that the objectives of the control procedure are met. Because of the inherent limitations in all control procedures, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the control. The design of any control procedure also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions; over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control procedure, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.

---

ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION
None

---

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Directors and Executive Officers
In March 2019, stockholders of the Company controlling a majority of the outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock delivered signed written consents to the Company removing Ronald Buschur, William Anderson, and Si Ryong Yu as members of the Company’s Board and electing Ms. Cipora Lavut, Mr. David Mann, and Dr. Robert Lempert as directors of the Company in their stead. As a result of Aura’s refused to recognize the legal effectiveness of the consents, in April 2019, stockholders filed suit in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware pursuant to Section 225 of the Delaware General Corporations Law, seeking an order confirming the validity of the consents. On July 8, 2019 the Court of Chancery entered final judgment in favor of the stockholder plaintiffs, confirming that (a) Ronald Buschur, Si Ryong Yu and William Anderson had been validly removed by the holders of a majority of the Company’s outstanding stock acting by written consent (b) Ms. Lavut, Mr. Mann and Dr. Lempert had been validly elected by the holders of a majority of the Company’s outstanding stock acting by written consent, and (c) the Company’s Board of Directors validly consists of Cipora Lavut, David Mann, Robert Lempert, Gary Douglas and Salvador Diaz-Versón, Jr. As a result of prior management’s unsuccessful opposition to this stockholder action filed in the Court of Chancery, such stockholders may be potentially entitled to recoup their litigation costs from the Company under Delaware’s corporate benefit doctrine and/or other legal provisions. To-date, no final determination has been made as to the amount of recoupment, if any, to which such stockholders may be entitled.
In July 2019 the employment of Melvin Gagerman was terminated. (See Item 3, Legal Proceedings for more information.) Also in July 2019, the Board of Directors appointed Ms. Lavut to succeed Mr. Gagerman as President of Aura, appointed Mr. Mann to succeed Mr. Gagerman as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, and appointed Dr. Lempert Secretary of Aura. In February 2022, the Board of Directors appointed Mr. Steven Willett to succeed Mr. Mann as the Company’s Chief Financial Officer. Mr. Mann remains on the Board of Directors.
The following table sets forth the names, ages, and offices of all our current directors and executive officers. Our officers are appointed by, and serve at the pleasure of, the Board of Directors. The stockholders at the annual meeting elect our directors to serve until the next meeting.
Name
Age
Title
Gary Douglas (1)
Director, Member of the Audit Committee
Salvador Diaz-Verson, Jr. (1)
Director, Chairman of the Audit Committee
David Mann (2), (3)
Director, Chairman of the Compensation Committee, Member of the Nominating Committee and Member of the Audit Committee, former Chief Financial Officer
Cipora Lavut (2)
President, Chairman of the Board, Member of Nominating Committee and Member of the Compensation Committee
Robert Lempert (2)
Secretary, Director, Chairman of the Nominating Committee and Member of the Compensation Committee
Steven Willett (4)
Chief Financial Officer
(1) Mr. Douglas and Mr. Diaz-Verson, Jr. were appointed to the Board of Directors on March 29, 2018 by the written consent of stockholders holding a majority of the Company’s shares.
(2) In March 2019, stockholders of the Company controlling a combined total of more than 27.5 million shares delivered signed written consents to the Company electing Ms. Lavut, Mr. Mann and Dr. Lempert to the Company’s Board of Directors. Because of Aura’s refusal to recognize the legal effectiveness of the consents, in April 2019 the stockholders filed suit in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware seeking an order confirming the validity of the elections. On July 8, 2019 the Court of Chancery entered final judgment in favor of the stockholder plaintiffs, confirming that Ms. Lavut, Mr. Mann and Dr. Lempert had been validly elected by the holders of a majority of the Company’s outstanding stock acting by written consent. In July 2019, the Board of Directors appointed Ms. Lavut President and Chairman of the Board, appointed Mr. Mann as Chief Financial Officer and appointed Dr. Lempert as Secretary.
(3) On February 14, 2022, Mr. Mann resigned as Chief Financial Officer.
(4) On February 14, 2022 Mr. Willett was appointed as Chief Financial Officer.
Biographical information with respect to our current directors and executive officer is provided below.
Salvador Diaz-Versón, Jr. Mr. Diaz-Versón, Jr. was elected as a director on March 29, 2018. Previously, he served as a director of the Company from 1997-2005 and again from June 2007 until January 2018. Mr. Diaz-Versón, Jr. is the founder, Chairman and President of Diaz-Verson Capital Investments, Inc., and was a registered investment advisor with the Securities and Exchange Commission until 2009. Mr. Diaz-Versón, Jr. served as President and member of the board of directors of American Family Corporation (AFLAC, INC.) from 1976 until 1992. Mr. Diaz-Versón, Jr. served as President and Chief Investment Officer of American Family Life Assurance Company, a subsidiary of AFLAC, Inc. He is currently Chairman of Miramar Securities. Mr. Diaz-Versón, Jr. has received two presidential appointments to the Christopher Columbus Fellowship Foundation; first by President George H.W. Bush in 1992 and subsequently by President Clinton in 2000. Mr. Diaz-Versón, Jr. is a trustee of the Florida State University Foundation and is a national trustee of the Boys and Girls Club of America. He also serves as a trustee of Clark Atlanta University. Mr. Diaz-Versón, Jr. is a graduate of Florida State University and was selected as a director in view of his lengthy experience in managing companies and his knowledge of capital investments.
Gary Douglas. Mr. Douglas was elected as a director on March 29, 2018. Mr. Gary Douglas has a BBA in Management degree, with extensive experience in cooperate communication and investment banking. He is a principal in Douglas Strategic Communications LLC, a marketing strategy and communications consultancy, and Ex officio Chairman of Picture Marketing, Inc., a digital marketing company. Mr. Douglas also formally served as Chief Marketing Officer of O’Melveny Consulting LLP, a unit of a global law firm. He also served as President of SP/Hambros America and Division President of Geneva Learning Systems and Group Vice President of Business Development for the five Geneva Companies, both SP/Hambros and The Geneva companies were middle market investment bankers. Mr. Douglas brings to the Board extensive experience in cooperate communication and investment banking.
Cipora Lavut. Ms. Lavut was one of Aura’s original founding members. From 1987 to 2002 Ms. Lavut served on Aura’s Board and as a Senior Vice President. During this period, Ms. Lavut was instrumental to Aura receiving large contracts from The Boeing Company, Litton Industries and the United States Air Force. Ms. Lavut also provided critical investor relations and marketing support during this time. Ms. Lavut left Aura in 2002. Ms. Lavut presently provides marketing and business consulting to a variety of retail and service-oriented businesses. She holds a degree from California State University, Northridge.
Robert Lempert. Dr. Lempert graduated from the University of Pennsylvania and conducted his residency at the Albert Einstein Medical Center in Philadelphia. Dr. Lempert also served as a Captain in the U.S. Army and previously served on the Company’s Board from November 28, 2017 (when he was appointed by the then-Board to fill one of the two existing vacancies) until January 11, 2018. Dr. Lempert has been a significant investor, shareholder and an active advocate of Aura’s technology for more than 20 years.
David Mann. Mr. Mann has been Vice President of Marketing for Mann Marketing, a manufacturing and import company, since 1990 and the Vice President of Sales of that company since 2007. From 2000 until 2007, Mr. Mann also served as Vice President of Operations. Mr. Mann has extensive experience dealing with all aspects of marketing and sales, as well as suppliers in both North America and China. Mr. Mann has been an investor in the Aura since 2007 and previously served as a director of the Company from November 28, 2017 (when he was appointed by the then-Board to fill one of the two existing vacancies) until January 11, 2018. Mr. Mann holds a degree in Business Administration from College St. Laurent, Montreal, Canada.
Steven Willett. Mr. Willett was previously employed by Govino, LLC, where he has served as CFO and Vice President of Finance since 2017. From 2014 to 2017, Mr. Willett served as Director of Finance for the Americas of Identiv, Inc., and prior to that, as Director of Finance of aerospace & defense contractor Trex Enterprises Corporation. Mr. Willett holds a Bachelor of Science degree in accounting from the University of Massachusetts and an M.B.A. with concentration in finance from Bentley University McCallum Graduate School of Business.
Delinquent Section 16(a) Reports
Our shares of common stock are registered under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and therefore our executive officers and directors and persons who beneficially own more than 10% of a registered class of our equity securities to file with the SEC initial statements of beneficial ownership, reports of changes in ownership and annual reports concerning their ownership of our common shares and other equity securities, on Forms 3, 4 and 5 respectively. Executive officers, directors and greater than 10% stockholders are required by the Securities and Exchange Commission regulations to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) reports they file. Based on our review of the copies of such forms received by us, and to the best of our knowledge, no executive officers, directors and persons holding greater than 10% of our issued and outstanding stock have filed the required reports during the years ended February 28, 2022 and February 28, 2021.
Code of Ethics
We have adopted a Code of Ethics applicable to the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and all other members of the Company’s Finance Department. This Code of Ethics is posted on the Company’s website within a broader Code of Business Conduct and Ethics at www.aurasystems.com in the Investor Relations section. We intend to satisfy the disclosure requirement under Item 10 of Form 8-K regarding an amendment to, or a waiver from, the provision of our Code of Ethics that applies to our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions and that relates to any element of such provision of our Code of Ethics by posting such information on our website within four business days of the date of such amendment or waiver. In the case of a waiver, the nature of the waiver, the name of the person to whom the waiver was granted and the date of the waiver will also be disclosed.
Family Relationships
None of our directors or executive officers is related to one another.
Committees of the Board of Directors
The Board maintains the following committees to assist it in discharging its oversight responsibilities.
Audit Committee. The Audit Committee does not have a formal charter but is responsible primarily for overseeing the services performed by our independent registered public accounting firm, evaluating our accounting policies and system of internal controls, and reviewing our annual and quarterly reports before filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The current members of the Audit Committee are Mr. Salvador Diaz Versón Jr., Mr. David Mann and Mr. Gary Douglas. The Board of Directors has determined that the Audit Committee does not have a member who is an “audit committee financial expert” as such term is defined by the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. While the Board recognizes that the Board members serving on the Audit Committee do not meet the qualifications required of an “audit committee financial expert,” the Board believes that the appointment of a new director to the Board of Directors and to the Audit Committee at this time is not necessary as the level of financial knowledge and experience of the current member of the Audit Committee, including such member’s ability to read and understand fundamental financial statements, is sufficient to adequately discharge the Audit Committee’s responsibilities
Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee does not have a formal charter but reviews and recommends to the full Board the amounts and types of compensation to be paid to the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer; reviews and approves the amounts and types of compensation to be paid to our other executive officers and the non-employee directors; reviews and approves, on behalf of the Board, salary, bonus and equity guidelines for our other employees; and administers our equity plans. The Compensation Committee is currently comprised of Mr. David Mann, Ms. Cipora Lavut and Dr. Robert Lempert.
Nominating Committee. The Nominating Committee does not have a formal charter but assists the Board in identifying qualified individuals to become directors, determines the composition of the Board and its committees, monitors the process to assess the Board’s effectiveness and helps develop and implement our corporate governance guidelines. The Nominating Committee also considers nominees proposed by stockholders. The Nominating Committee currently consists of Mr. David Mann, Ms. Cipora Lavut and Dr. Robert Lempert.
Director Compensation
Although we do not currently compensate our directors in cash for their service as members of our Board of Directors, the Board may, in its discretion, elect to compensate directors for attending Board and Committee meetings and to reimburse directors for out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with attending such meetings. Additionally, our directors are eligible to receive stock options under the 2011 Directors and Executive Officer Stock Option Plan.
During Fiscal 2022, the President and Board Chairman received options under the 2011 Directors and Executive Officers Stock Option Plan (the “2011 Plan”) to acquire 500,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $0.50. Additionally, during Fiscal 2022, the other four Directors received options in varying amounts under the 2011 Plan to acquire an aggregate total of 1,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $0.25. On the date of these grants, the Company’s shares were traded at $0.35 and $0.24 per share, respectively.
During Fiscal 2021, each Director received options under the 2011 Plan to acquire 250,000 shares of the Company’s common stock, an aggregate total of 1,250,000 shares, at an exercise price of $0.25. On the date of grant the shares were traded at $0.16 per share. There are no payments due to any directors upon their resignation or retirement as members of the Board.

---

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The following table sets forth the compensation earned by or paid to the principal executive officer and the named executive officers during the Fiscal years ended February 28, 2022 and February 28, 2021.
Summary Compensation Table
Fiscal Salary Option Awards Non-Equity Incentive Compensation All Other Compensation Total
Name and Principal Position Year ($) ($) ($) ($) ($)
Cipora Lavut 144,750 (2) - - 100,000 (3) 250,000
President 140,000 (1) - - - 140,000
Steven Willett 6,154 (4) - - - 6,154
Chief Financial Officer
(1) Ms. Lavut was elected President effective July 9, 2019 and on March 19, 2020, the Board of Directors authorized an annual salary of $250,000, retroactively effective to January 1, 2020. For Fiscal 2021, Ms. Lavut accrued an annual salary of $250,000 and was paid $140,000 in cash over the same period, deferring the balance.
(2) For Fiscal 2022, Ms. Lavut has been accruing an annual salary of $250,000 and has been paid $144,750 in cash over the same period, deferring the balance.
(3) Additionally in Fiscal 2022, Ms. Lavut received approximately 286,000 shares of common stock to settle $100,000 of previously deferred accrued salary.
(4) Mr. Willett began serving as Chief Financial Officer in February 2022. The amount in the table for Fiscal 2022 represents the pro rata compensation received for the two-week period since his appointment.
Outstanding Equity Awards at 2022 Fiscal Year-End
The Board of Directors and Executive Officers have been granted various options to acquire the Company’s common stock under the Company’s 2011 Directors and Executive Officers Stock Option Plan )the “2011 Plan”) as detailed in the table below. All of these options were outstanding as of February 28, 2022.
Stock
Options &
Warrants
Outstanding Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual Life
in Years Weighted
Average Exercise
Price of Options
& Warrants
Outstanding
Cipora Lavut, President and Board Chair 750,000 3.67 $ 0.42
Salvador Diaz-Verson, Jr., Director 1,108,857 2.74 $ 0.62
Gary Douglas, Director 700,000 2.75 $ 0.76
David Mann, Director 650,912 2.37 $ 0.64
Robert Lempert, Director 350,000 3.26 $ 0.25
Option Exercises and Stock Vesting During Fiscal 2022
No stock options were exercised during Fiscal 2022 by the individuals named in the Summary Compensation Table.
On February 25, 2021, the Board of Directors approved the grant of 500,000 options to acquire the Company’s common stock to the Company’s President for successfully recruiting advisors to the Board under the Company’s Directors and Executive Officers Stock Option Plan. The options were granted with immediate vesting, a five-year expiration term, and with an exercise price of $0.50 per option share.
On December 10, 2020, the Board of Directors approved the grant of an aggregate total of 1,000,000 options to acquire the Company’s common stock to four of the five current Board members in varying amounts for services provided outside of standard Board responsibilities under the Company’s 2011 Plan. The options were granted with pro rata monthly vesting over a one-year vesting period, with a five-year expiration term, and with an exercise price of $0.25 per option share.
Option Exercises and Stock Vesting During Fiscal 2021
No stock options were exercised during Fiscal 2021 by the individuals named in the Summary Compensation Table.
On March 19, 2020, the Board of Directors approved the grant of an aggregate total of 1,250,000 options to acquire the Company’s common stock to each of the five current board members in equal amounts of 250,000 per person under the Company’s 2011 Plan. Per the terms of the 2011 Plan, vesting occurs after a six-month period plus one day from the date of grant, with a five-year expiration term, and with an exercise price of $0.25 per option share.
Employment Contracts, Termination of Employment Contracts and Change in Control Arrangements
We do not currently have any employment agreements with any of our Named Executive Officers. In March 2020, the Board of Directors approved an annual salary for Ms. Lavut of $250,000, retroactively effective from January 1, 2020.
Potential Payments to the Named Executive Officers Upon Termination or Change in Control
None of the named executive officers is entitled to any payments or benefits upon termination, whether by change in control or otherwise, other than benefits available generally to all employees.

---

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
The following table sets forth, to the extent of our knowledge, certain information regarding our common stock owned as of June 30, 2020 (i) by each person who is known to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of our outstanding common stock, (ii) by each of our Directors and the named executive officers in the Summary Compensation Table, and (iii) by all Directors and current executive officers as a group:
Beneficial Ownership Table
Beneficial Owner (1) Number of
Shares of
Common
Stock Percent of
Common
Stock
Salvador Diaz-Verson, Jr. (2) 1,178,607 1.4 %
Gary Douglas (3) 700,000 * %
Cipora Lavut (4) 2,639,660 3.1 %
Robert Lempert (5) 497,343 * %
David Mann (6) 2,062,843 2.5 %
Steven Willett (7) * %
All current executive officers and Directors as a group (six) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) 7,078,603 8.2 %
5% Stockholders
Warren Breslow (8) 9,958,116 11.6 %
Elimelech Lowy (9) 7,612,645 8.7 %
BetterSea LLC (10) 9,179,912 11.0 %
* Less than 1% of outstanding shares
(1) Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission. The calculation of the percentage of beneficial ownership is based upon 83,123,537 shares of common stock outstanding on February 28, 2022. In computing the number of shares beneficially owned by any stockholder and the percentage ownership of such stockholder, shares of common stock which may be acquired by a such stockholder upon exercise or conversion of warrants or options which are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of February 28, 2022, are deemed to be exercised and outstanding. Such shares, however, are not deemed outstanding for purposes of computing the beneficial ownership percentage of any other person. Shares issuable upon exercise of warrants and options which are subject to stockholder approval are not deemed outstanding for purposes of determining beneficial ownership. Except as indicated by footnote, to our knowledge, the persons named in the table above have the sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of common stock shown as beneficially owned by them. The mailing address for each of the officers and directors is c/o Aura Systems, Inc., 20431 North Sea, Lake Forest, CA 92630.
(2) Includes 1,108,857 warrants exercisable within 60 days of February 28, 2022.
(3) Includes 700,000 warrants exercisable within 60 days of February 28, 2021.
(4) Includes 750,000 warrants exercisable within 60 days of February 28, 2022.
(5) Includes warrants to purchase 350,000 shares exercisable within 60 days of February 28, 2021.
(6) Includes warrants to purchase 650,912 shares exercisable within 60 days of February 28, 2022, as well as 1,411,931 shares, 979,204 of which Mr. Mann has sole dispositive power and approximately 432,727 of which, Mr. Mann holds a power of attorney to vote such shares.
(7) Includes common shares only as of February 28, 2022.
(8) Includes warrants to purchase 16,000 shares exercisable within 60 days of February 28, 2022, and the right to convert $3,000,000 and accrued interest of $412,911 convertible note payable to 2,437,794 common shares at a conversion price of $1.40.
(9) Includes warrants to purchase 4,092,877 shares exercisable within 60 days of February 28, 2022. and 3,519,768 shares, which Mr. Lowy has sole dispositive power.
(10) Includes common shares only as of February 28, 2022.
Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans as of February 28, 2022
Equity Compensation Plan Information as of February 28, 2022
a. b. c.
Plan Category Number of
Securities to be
Issued Upon
Exercise of
Outstanding
Options, Warrants
and Rights Weighted
Average
Exercise Price
for Options,
Warrants
and Rights Number of Securities
For Future Issuances
Under Equity
Compensation Plans
(Excluding Securities Reflected in Column (a.)
Equity compensation plans approved by equity holders 3,559,769 $ 0.55 16,129,445
Equity compensation plans not approved by equity holders 1,500,000 $ 0.50 -
(1) Reflects options under the 2006 Stock Option Plan and the 2011 Stock Option Plan, of which both were approved by Company shareholders. Additionally, it includes options which were authorized by the Board but cannot be issued until the proposal for renewal of the employee stock option plan is approved by the shareholders. The 2006 Stock Option Plan authorizes the Company to grant stock options exercisable for up to an aggregate number of shares of common stock equal to the greater of (i) 10,000,000 shares of common stock, or (ii) 10% of the number of shares of common stock outstanding from time to time. The 2011 Stock Option Plan authorizes the Company to grant stock options or warrants to executive officers and directors exercisable for up to an aggregate number of shares equivalent to 15% of the number of shares of common stock outstanding from time to time. The numbers in this table are as of February 28, 2022 (See Note 15 to the Financial Statements).
For additional information regarding options and warrants, see Note 15 to our financial statements appearing elsewhere in this report.

---

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
Review and Approval of Related Party Transactions
Our Audit Committee is responsible for the review and approval of all related party transactions required to be disclosed to the public under SEC rules. This procedure has been established by our Board of Directors in order to serve the interests of our shareholders. Related party transactions are reviewed and approved by the Audit Committee on a case-by-case basis. Under existing, unwritten policy no related party transaction can be approved by the Audit Committee unless it is first determined that the terms of such transaction is on terms no less favorable to us than could be obtained from an unaffiliated third party on an arms-length basis and is otherwise in our best interest.
Director Independence
Using the definition of “independence” included in the listing rules of The Nasdaq Stock Market, our Board has determined that Salvador Diaz-Versón, Jr. and Gary Douglas are both independent directors.

---

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND DISCLOSURES
The following table sets forth the aggregate fees billed to us by BF Borgers, CPA, PC (“BFB CPA”) for the years ended February 28, 2022, and February 29, 2021:
Year Ended
February 28,
February 29,
Audit Fees $ 50,000 $ 61,000
Audit-related fees - -
Tax fees - -
All other fees - -
Total $ 50,000 $ 61,000
As defined by the SEC, (i) “audit fees” are fees for professional services rendered by our principal accountant for the audit of our annual financial statements and review of financial statements included in our Form 10-K, or for services that are normally provided by the accountant in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements for those Fiscal years; (ii) “audit-related fees” are fees for assurance and related services by our principal accountant that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of our financial statements and are not reported under “audit fees;” (iii) “tax fees” are fees for professional services rendered by our principal accountant for tax compliance, tax advice, and tax planning; and (iv) “all other fees” are fees for products and services provided by our principal accountant, other than the services reported under “audit fees,” “audit-related fees,” and “tax fees.”
Audit Fees
Services provided to us by BFB CPA, Inc. with respect the audit of our annual financial statements and review of our annual reports on Form 10-K and for reviews of the financial statements are included in our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q for the first three quarters of the years ended February 28, 2022 and February 29, 2021.
Audit Related Fees
BFB CPA did not provide any professional services to us during Fiscal 2022 or Fiscal 2021 which would constitute “audit related fees”.
Tax Fees
BFB CPA did not provide any professional services to us during Fiscal 2022 or Fiscal 2021 which would constitute “tax fees”.
All Other Fees
BFB CPA did not provide any professional services to us during Fiscal 2022 or Fiscal 2021 which would constitute “other fees”.
Policy on Audit Committee Pre-Approval of Audit and Permissible Non-Audit Services of Independent Auditors
Under the SEC’s rules, the Audit Committee is required to pre-approve the audit and permissible non-audit services performed by the independent registered public accounting firm in order to ensure that they do not impair the auditors’ independence. The SEC’s rules specify the types of non-audit services that an independent auditor may not provide to its audit client and establish the Audit Committee’s responsibility for administration of the engagement of the independent registered public accounting firm.
Consistent with the SEC’s rules, the Audit Committee pre-approves all audit and permissible non-audit services provided by our independent auditors. These services may include audit services, audit-related services, tax and other services. Pre-approval is generally provided for up to one year, and any pre-approval is detailed as to the particular service or category of services and is generally subject to a specific budget. The independent auditors and management are required to periodically report to the Audit Committee regarding the extent of services provided by the independent auditors in accordance with this pre-approval, and the fees for the services performed to date. The Audit Committee may also pre-approve particular services on a case-by-case basis. During Fiscal 2022 and Fiscal 2021 all services provided by BFB CPA were pre-approved by the Audit Committee in accordance with this policy.
There were no hours expended on the principal accountant’s engagement to audit the registrant’s financial statements for the most recent Fiscal year that were attributed to work performed by persons other than the principal accountant’s full-time, permanent employees.
PART IV

---

ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
Documents filed as part of this Form 10-K:
1. Financial Statements
See Index to Financial Statements at page
2. Financial Statement Schedules
See Index to Financial Statements at page
3. Exhibits
See Exhibit Index