EDGAR 10-K Filing

Company CIK: 310522
Filing Year: 2025
Filename: 310522_10-K_2025_0000310522-25-000199.json

---

ITEM 1. BUSINESS
Item 1. Business
About Fannie Mae
Fannie Mae is a leading source of financing for residential mortgages in the United States. We provided $381 billion in
liquidity to the mortgage market in 2024 , which enabled the financing of approximately 1.4 million home purchases,
refinancings, and rental units.
We are a government-sponsored, stockholder-owned corporation, chartered by Congress to provide liquidity and
stability to the U.S. housing market and to promote access to mortgage credit. We primarily do this by buying residential
mortgage loans that are originated by lenders. We place these loans into trusts and issue guaranteed mortgage-backed
securities (“MBS” or “Fannie Mae MBS”) that global investors buy from us. We do not originate mortgage loans or lend
money directly to borrowers.
We provide a guaranty on the MBS that we issue. If a borrower fails to make a payment on a mortgage loan that is
included in a Fannie Mae MBS, we pay the shortfall amount to the MBS investor. In exchange for providing this
guaranty, we receive a guaranty fee. Guaranty fees are the primary source of our revenues.
Because we assume the credit risk for mortgage loans in our MBS, our earnings are impacted by the credit performance
of these loans. Credit risk management is therefore key to our business model and financial results. To help manage our
mortgage credit risk exposure, and in response to capital and other requirements, we transfer some of our credit risk
exposure to third parties through credit risk transfer transactions and mortgage insurance. For a discussion of how we
manage credit risk, see “ MD&A - Single-Family Business - Single-Family Mortgage Credit Risk Management ” and
“ MD&A - Multifamily Business - Multifamily Mortgage Credit Risk Management .”
We support both single-family and multifamily housing. Our Single-Family business provides financing for properties
that have four or fewer residential units. Our Multifamily business provides financing for residential buildings with five or
more units. As of September 30, 2024 (the latest date for which information is available), Fannie Mae owned or
guaranteed an estimated 26% of single-family mortgage debt outstanding and an estimated 21% of multifamily
mortgage debt outstanding in the United States.
For information on how we help make access to housing in the United States more attainable, affordable, and stable for
low- and moderate-income borrowers and renters, see our 2023 Annual Housing Activities Report, which is available on
our website.
We have been in conservatorship since 2008. The Federal Housing Finance Agency (“FHFA”) is our conservator. During
conservatorship, our Board has no fiduciary duties to the company or its stockholders, as they owe their fiduciary duties
of care and loyalty solely to FHFA as conservator. Conservatorship and our agreements with the U.S. Department of the
Treasury (“Treasury”) significantly restrict our business activities and stockholder rights. For more information about the
impact of conservatorship and these agreements on our business, stockholders, and our uncertain future, see
“ Conservatorship and Treasury Agreements ” and “ Risk Factors - GSE and Conservatorship Risk .”
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
Business | Financial Results Summary
Financial Results Summary
Please read this summary together with our MD&A, our consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2024 and
the accompanying notes.
2024 vs. 2023
• Net revenues of $29.1 billion in 2024 were relatively flat co mpared with 2023 net revenues of $29.0 billion . Net
revenues consist of net interest income and fee and other income.
• Non-interest expense of $9.8 billion in 2024 sta yed relatively flat with 2023 expenses of $10.0 billion .
• Net income of $17.0 billion was down slightly in 2024 compared with net income of $17.4 billion in 2023 . This
was primarily driven by a decrease in benefit for credit losses.
In 2024 , we continued to realize a benefit for credit losses, which represents a $938 million single-family benefit
for credit losses, largely offset by a $752 million multifamily provision for credit losses. The $186 million benefit
in 2024 was $1.5 billion lower than the $1.7 billion benefit in 2023 . This decline was primarily driven by a lower
single-family benefit due to stronger alignment between actual home price growth and our forecast in 2024 than
in 2023 . This decline was also driven by a higher multifamily provision primarily attributable to an incremental
decline in property values, rising delinquencies and t he ongoing investigation of lending transactions with
suspected fraud.
• Net worth increased by $17.0 billion in 2024 to $94.7 billion as of December 31, 2024 .
2023 vs. 2022
• Net revenues dec reased $687 million in 2023 compared with 2022 , primarily due to lower deferred guaranty fee
income, offset by higher income from the corporate liquidity portfolio. Higher interest rates in 2023 drove both
the decline in deferred guaranty fee income due to lower refinancing activity as well as the higher income on
securities in our corporate liquidity portfolio.
• Net income increased $4.5 billion in 2023 compared with 2022 , primarily driven by a $7.9 billion shift to benefit
for credit losses in 2023 from a provision f or credit losses in 2022 .
• Net worth increased by $17.4 billion in 2023 to $77.7 billion as of December 31, 2023 .
For more information on the drivers of our financial results, see “ MD&A - Consolidated Results of Operations .” In
addition, see “Key Market Economic Indicators” for a description on how our financial results can be impacted by
varying macroeconomic conditions such as changes in interest rates and home prices.
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
Business | Business Segments
Business Segments
We have two reportable business segments : Single-Family and Multifamily. The chart below outlines the primary
business activities and drivers of revenues and expense for each of our business segments.
Single-Family Business Segment
Primary Business Activities
Primary Drivers of Revenue 1
Primary Drivers of Expense 1
Mortgage acquisitions and
securitizations: Works with lenders to
acquire single-family mortgage loans,
securitize the loans and issue MBS.
Credit risk management: Prices and
manages the credit risk on loans in our
single-family guaranty book, which
includes establishing underwriting and
servicing standards. Enters into
transactions that transfer a portion of
the credit risk on some of the loans in
our single-family guaranty book to third
parties.
Credit loss management: Works to
reduce costs of defaulted single-family
loans, including through home retention
solutions, foreclosure alternatives,
management of foreclosures and our
real-estate owned (“REO”) inventory,
selling nonperforming loans, and
pursuing contractual remedies from
lenders, servicers and providers of
credit enhancement.
Net interest income: Primary source is
guaranty fees-compensation we receive
for assuming the credit risk on our single-
family guaranty book. There are two
components of our single-family guaranty
fee:
• Base fees . Ongoing fees that factor
into a mortgage loan’s interest rate,
which are collected each month over
the life of the loan. (Includes fees
implemented pursuant to the
Temporary Payroll Tax Cut
Continuation Act of 2011, as amended
(“TCCA”), which are paid to Treasury.)
• Upfront fees. One-time payments made
by lenders upon loan delivery. Includes
risk-based fees (referred to as “loan-
level price adjustments”) that vary
based on loan and borrower attributes.
These fees are amortized into net
interest income over the life of the loan.
Another source is net interest income
earned from our corporate liquidity
portfolio and retained mortgage portfolio.
Provision for credit losses: Consists of
the provision for credit losses on loans
in our single-family guaranty book. (In
some periods, we may have a benefit
for credit losses.)
Administrative expenses: Consists of
salaries and employee benefits,
professional services, and technology
and occupancy costs relating to the
Single-Family Business.
Legislative assessments: Primarily
consists of TCCA fees (which are a
portion of our single-family guaranty
fees paid to Treasury pursuant to the
TCCA). Also includes portions of FHFA
assessments and allocations relating to
payments we make to affordable
housing funds pursuant to statutory
requirements.
Credit enhancement expense: Consists
of costs associated with single-family
freestanding credit enhancements.
Multifamily Business Segment
Primary Business Activities
Primary Drivers of Revenue 1
Primary Drivers of Expense 1
Mortgage acquisitions and
securitizations: Works with lenders,
primarily through our Delegated
Underwriting and Servicing (“DUS ®” )
program, to acquire multifamily
mortgage loans, securitize the loans
and issue MBS.
Credit risk management: Prices and
manages the credit risk on loans in our
multifamily guaranty book, which
includes establishing underwriting and
servicing standards. Lenders retain a
portion of the credit risk in substantially
all multifamily transactions. Enters into
additional transactions that transfer a
portion of the credit risk on some of the
loans in our multifamily guaranty book
to third parties.
Credit loss management: Works to
reduce costs of defaulted multifamily
loans, including through loss mitigation
strategies, management of foreclosures
and our REO inventory, and pursuing
contractual remedies from lenders,
servicers, borrowers, sponsors, and
providers of credit enhancement.
Net interest income: Primary source is
guaranty fees-compensation we receive
for assuming the credit risk on our
multifamily guaranty book. For multifamily
loans, base fees are the primary
component of our guaranty fee. Multifamily
guaranty fee income does not include
upfront fees.
Another source is net interest income
earned from our corporate liquidity
portfolio and retained mortgage portfolio.
Provision for credit losses: Consists of
the provision for credit losses on loans
in our multifamily guaranty book. (In
some periods, we may have a benefit
for credit losses.)
Administrative expenses: Consists of
salaries and employee benefits,
professional services, and technology
and occupancy costs relating to the
Multifamily Business.
Credit enhancement expense: Consists
of costs associated with multifamily
freestanding credit enhancements.
(1) See “MD&A-Business Segment Financial Results” for a discussion of other drivers of our single-family and multifamily financial results.
Fair value gains were a significant driver of single-family financial results for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023.
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
Business | Business Segments
We purchase primarily single-family conventional loans that meet conforming loan limits in the secondary mortgage
market. Conventional loans are not insured or guaranteed by a government agency (those are generally referred to as
government-guaranteed loans). See “ Legislation and Regulation - Our Charter ” for a description of our conforming loan
limits.
The chart below displays the unpaid principal balance (“UPB”) of our average single-family conventional guaranty book
of business and our multifamily guaranty book of business, as well as our average single-family and multifamily charged
guaranty fee.
Guaranty Book of Business and Average Charged Guaranty Fee by Segment
(Dollars in trillions ) 1
Average charged guaranty fee on single-family
conventional guaranty book of business (in basis
points), net of TCCA fees (2)
Average charged guaranty fee on multifamily guaranty
book of business (in basis points) at end of period
Average single-family conventional guaranty book of
business (3)
Multifamily guaranty book of business as of period end
(1) Measured based on the unpaid principal balance of mortgage loans underlying Fannie Mae MBS outstanding.
(2) Excludes the impact of a 10 basis point guaranty fee increase implemented pursuant to the TCCA, the incremental revenue from which is
paid to Treasury and not retained by us.
(3) Our average single-family conventional guaranty book of business is based on the average of quarter-end balances.
Our average single-family conventional guaranty book of business remained relatively flat in 2024 compared with 2023 .
The average charged guaranty fee, net of TCCA fees, on the single-family conventional guaranty book increased by 0.7
basis points to 47.6 basis points in 2024 , primarily as a result of higher base guaranty fees charged on new acquisitions.
Our multifamily guaranty book of business grew by 6.2% in 2024 to $499.7 billion driven by our acquisitions combined
with low prepayment volumes due to the high interest rate environment. The average charged guaranty fee on the
multifamily guaranty book declined by 1.7 basis points to 74.4 basis points in 2024 , due to lower average charged fees
on our 2024 acquisitions as compared with the existing loans in our multifamily guaranty book of business.
The chart below displays the net income for each of our business segments.
Business Segment Net Income
(Dollars in billions)
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
Business | Business Segments
See “ MD&A - Single-Family Business ” and “ MD&A - Multifamily Business ” for more information on the primary business
activities and business metrics of our Single-Family and Multifamily businesses. See “ MD&A - Business Segment
Financial Results ” for more information on the financial results of our Single-Family and Multifamily businesses.
Competition
We conduct business in the U.S. residential mortgage markets and the global securities markets. According to the
Federal Reserve, total U.S. residential mortgage debt outstanding was estimated to be approximately $16.5 trillion as of
September 30, 2024 (the latest date for which information is available). We owned or guaranteed mortgage assets
representing approximately 25% of total U.S. residential mortgage debt outstanding as of September 30, 2024 .
We compete to acquire mortgage assets in the secondary mortgage market and to issue mortgage-backed securities to
investors. Our primary competitors for the acquisition of single-family loans are Freddie Mac, t he Federal Home Loan
Banks (“FHLBs”) , private institutions (such as U.S. banks and thrifts, securities dealers, insurance companies and
investment funds) and government agencies (such as the Federal Housing Administration (“FHA”) and the Department
of Veterans Affairs (“VA”)). Our primary competitors for the issuance and/or guarantee of single-family mortgage-backed
securities are Freddie Mac, Ginnie Mae (which primarily guarantees securities backed by FHA-insured loans and VA-
guaranteed loans) and private market competitors. Our primary competitors for the acquisition of multifamily mortgage
assets are Freddie Mac, life insurers, U.S. banks and thrifts, and other institutional investors. Our primary competitors
for the issuance of multifamily mortgage-backed securities are Freddie Mac, U.S. banks, Ginnie Mae, and private-label
issuers of commercial mortgage-backed securities.
Competition to acquire mortgage assets and issue mortgage-backed securities is affected by many factors, including:
our and our competitors’ pricing, eligibility standards and risk appetite; the number and nature of residential mortgage
loans originated and available for us to purchase in the secondary mortgage market; investor demand for mortgage
assets; and macroeconomic conditions. Our ability to compete may also be affected by many other factors, including:
our and our competitors’ capital requirements; our and Freddie Mac’s return on capital requirements ; applicable
requirements to purchase mission-related loans; FHFA’s single-family mortgage purchase, servicing and securitization
requirements aimed at aligning our single-family MBS with Freddie Mac’s MBS; direction from FHFA; new or existing
legislation or regulations applicable to us, our lenders or our investors; and our senior preferred stock purchase
agreement with Treasury. See “ MD&A - Single-Family Business - Single-Family Competition ” and “ MD&A - Multifamily
Business - Multifamily Competition ” for more information on the competition faced by our business segments. See
“ Conservatorship and Treasury Agreements ,” “ Legislation and Regulation ,” and “ Risk Factors ” for information on matters
that affect or could affect our competitive environment.
Mortgage Securitizations
Overview
We securitize most of the single-family and multifamily mortgage loans we acquire. Securitization refers to the process
of converting income-generating assets into securities that can be sold to investors. Payments from those assets are
regularly distributed to investors as security holders. The MBS that we issue are generally fixed-income securities that
trade in the global capital markets.
Our Fannie Mae MBS guaranty insulates investors in our MBS from mortgage borrower credit risk. If any borrower
whose loan is in one of our MBS trusts fails to make a monthly payment, we pay those shortfall amounts to the MBS
investors. In exchange for providing this guaranty, we receive a guaranty fee. Guaranty fees are intended to cover the
expected credit losses, administrative costs, cost of capital and return on capital targets associated with the loans we
guarantee. For single-family loans, guaranty fees also include the TCCA fees we are required to pay to Treasury.
We create Fannie Mae MBS by placing mortgage loans in a trust and issuing securities backed by those mortgage
loans. Our multifamily MBS generally have only one multifamily loan per MBS trust, while our single-family MBS have
multiple loans per MBS trust. We act as trustee of our MBS trusts.
Types of Mortgage Securitization Transactions
We engage in three broad categories of mortgage securitization transactions:
• Lender Swap Transactions: A mortgage lender delivers mortgage loans to us in exchange for Fannie Mae
MBS backed by those mortgage loans. The lender may choose to hold the MBS they receive or sell the MBS to
other investors.
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
Business | Mortgage Securitizations
• Portfolio Securitization Transactions: A lender sells us mortgage loans for cash. When we have acquired
enough mortgage loans or in response to MBS investor requests for Fannie Mae MBS with certain
characteristics, we deliver those loans to an MBS trust in exchange for Fannie Mae MBS, which we then sell to
MBS investors. Most of the single-family mortgage loans we buy for cash are from small to mid-sized lenders.
This acquisition type allows us to give small and mid-sized lenders competitive pricing while also providing
servicing and funding options that lenders can tailor to their needs.
• Structured Securitization Transactions: We create structured Fannie Mae MBS in response to requests from
lenders and dealers. In these transactions, the lender or dealer owns a mortgage-related asset (typically one or
more MBS) and transfers that asset for a structured Fannie Mae MBS we issue. The process for issuing
structured Fannie Mae MBS is similar to the process for our lender swap securitizations described above. We
receive a transaction fee from the lender or dealer for the issuance of the structured MBS securities.
Common Securitization Solutions
Certain aspects of the securitization process for our single-family Fannie Mae MBS issuances are performed by
Common Securitization Solutions, LLC (“CSS”). CSS is a limited liability company we own jointly with Freddie Mac. We
do not use CSS for multifamily Fannie Mae MBS. See “Risk Factors-GSE and Conservatorship Risk” for a discussion
of risks posed by our reliance on CSS to securitize the single-family MBS we issue and for ongoing administrative
functions for our single-family MBS.
Human Capital
Overview
Our employees are key to ensuring our long-term success and meeting our strategic objectives. Our comprehensive
human capital management strategy is focused on attracting, engaging, retaining and developing a highly skilled
workforce. We had approximately 8,200 employees as of December 2024. These dedicated employees are the driving
force behind delivering on our mission. We believe many employees and potential recruits are attracted by our mission,
the compelling nature of our work and our culture of inclusivity and respect, despite our uncertain future and limitations
on the compensation we can offer. See “ Risk Factors - GSE and Conservatorship Risk ” for a discussion of how
restrictions on our compensation and uncertainty with respect to our future can affect our ability to recruit and retain
employees.
See “ Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance - Corporate Governance - Human Capital Management
Oversight ” for information on oversight of human capital management by our Board of Directors’ Compensation and
Human Capital Committee.
Attracting and Retaining Employees
We offer a total rewards package that delivers a variety of cash and non-cash rewards designed to motivate employees
and improve company performance. The employee benefits that we offer promote personal and family wellness, and
encourage involvement in personally meaningful endeavors, including those that echo our mission. These benefits
include: caregiving and bereavement leave; paid leave to engage in volunteer activities; assistance with higher
education costs; and broad mental, physical and financial well-being benefits.
Engaging and Developing Employees
We are committed to maintaining an engaged workforce as we believe it is critical to the ongoing achievement of the
company’s and the conservator’s goals. We monitor employee engagement through regular surveys. In our final survey
of 2024, 78% of employees participated, and 92% of those who responded indicated they would recommend Fannie
Mae as a great place to work, which we consider to be a strong indicator of their engagement.
We place a strong emphasis on succession planning and talent development to attract and retain talent and improve
promotion readiness and cultivate bench strength. We invest in our employees’ development to support their career
aspirations. We provide training and opportunities that enable employees to develop business, technical, leadership and
other critical skills we need to achieve our strategic objectives and fulfill our mission. We believe our succession
planning approach works to mitigate potential risk to the company posed by unexpected leadership departures.
Culture
We strive to maintain a culture of inclusion and respect, which is reinforced by our Code of Conduct. Employees are
required to annually certify their understanding of and commitment to our Code of Conduct. We also emphasize to our
employees their responsibility for, and opportunity to play a key role in, managing risk through our risk assessment and
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
Business | Human Capital
monitoring activities, training and corporate messaging. Our employees are encouraged to find better ways to fulfill our
mission safely, responsibly and efficiently. We believe this culture of continuous learning and improvement promotes
innovation and enhances our resiliency, while also enabling the development of our workforce.
We foster an environment in which all employees are treated with dignity and respect, can contribute to meaningful
work, and have the opportunity to grow their careers in an inclusive environment free from discrimination, harassment,
and retaliation. We support these critical concepts by establishing and promoting policies that articulate the importance
of and the value we place on diverse perspectives and inclusion, consistent with the principles of equal opportunity and
in accordance with our statutory mandates under the GSE Act. This commitment helps us attract and retain a skilled
workforce at all levels of our organization.
We sponsor programs and activities to cultivate an inclusive work environment by focusing on leadership principles,
talent development, enterprise accessibility, team and group dynamics, and a consistent communications strategy that
reinforces the practice of driving inclusion to achieve innovative solutions.
Conservatorship and Treasury Agreements
Conservatorship
In September 2008, FHFA was appointed as our conservator pursuant to authority provided by the Federal Housing
Enterprises Financial Safety and Soundness Act of 1992, as amended (the “GSE Act”). Conservatorship is a statutory
process designed to preserve and conserve our assets and property and put the company in a sound and solvent
condition. Our conservatorship has no specified termination date.
FHFA Authority As Conservator
FHFA, as conservator, succeeded to:
• all rights, titles, powers and privileges of Fannie Mae, and of any stockholder, officer or director of Fannie Mae
with respect to Fannie Mae and its assets; and
• title to the books, records and assets of any other legal custodian of Fannie Mae.
As conservator, FHFA has broad authority over our business and operations, including the authority to:
• direct us to enter into contracts or enter into contracts on our behalf; and
• transfer or sell our assets or liabilities.
The GSE Act provides special protections for mortgage loans and mortgage-related assets we hold in trust. Specifically,
mortgage loans and mortgage-related assets that have been transferred to a Fannie Mae MBS trust must be held by the
conservator for the beneficial owners of such MBS and cannot be used to satisfy the company’s general creditors.
Since 2012, FHFA has released annual corporate performance objectives for us, referred to as the conservatorship
scorecard. For information on FHFA’s 2024 conservatorship scorecard objectives and our performance against these
objectives, see “Executive Compensation-Compensation Discussion and Analysis-Assessment of Corporate
Performance against 2024 Scorecard.”
Board Authority in Conservatorship
While we are operating in conservatorship, our directors:
• serve on behalf of the conservator;
• exercise their authority as directed by and with the approval (where required) of the conservator;
• owe their fiduciary duties of care and loyalty solely to the conservator, and not to either the company or our
stockholders; and
• are elected by the conservator, not by our stockholders .
As conservator, FHFA has issued an order authorizing our Board of Directors to exercise specified functions and
authorities, and instructions regarding matters for which conservator decision or notification is required. The conservator
retains the authority to amend or withdraw its order and instructions at any time. For more information on the functions
and authorities of our Board of Directors during conservatorship, see “ Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate
Governance - Corporate Governance - Conservatorship and Board Authorities .”
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
Business | Conservatorship and Treasury Agreements
Stockholder Authority in Conservatorship
The conservator has suspended stockholder meetings since conservatorship, and our common stockholders are not
empowered to vote on directors or any other matters. The conservator also eliminated dividends on our common and
preferred stock (other than dividends on the senior preferred stock issued to Treasury) during the conservatorship.
Treasury Agreements
FHFA, as conservator, entered into a senior preferred stock purchase agreement with Treasury on our behalf in
September 2008. In connection with that agreement, we issued Treasury one million shares of Variable Liquidation
Preference Senior Preferred Stock, Series 2008-2, which we refer to as the “senior preferred stock,” and a warrant to
purchase shares equal to 79.9% of our common stock, on a fully diluted basis, for a nominal price.
The senior preferred stock purchase agreement and the terms of the senior preferred stock have been amended
multiple times since 2008 by FHFA (acting on our behalf) and Treasury, including most recently on January 2, 2025. The
January 2025 letter agreement amending the senior preferred stock purchase agreement, senior preferred stock and
warrant is described in a Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on January 7, 2025 and
in “Note 2, Conservatorship, Senior Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement and Related Matters.”
Senior Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement and Senior Preferred Stock
The senior preferred stock purchase agreement and accompanying stock certificate include key provisions that impact
us, including those described in the table below.
Treasury Funding
Commitment
• On a quarterly basis, we may draw funds from Treasury to cover the amount that our total
liabilities exceed our total assets for the applicable fiscal quarter (referred to as the
“deficiency amount”), up to the amount of remaining funding commitment under the
agreement.
• As of the date of this filing:
◦ $119.8 billion has been paid to us by Treasury under this funding commitment; and
◦ $113.9 billion of funding commitment from Treasury remains; this amount would be
reduced by any future payments by Treasury under the commitment.
Termination
Provisions for
Funding
Commitment
• Treasury’s funding commitment has no specified end date, but will terminate upon:
◦ our liquidation and the fulfillment of Treasury’s obligations under its funding commitment;
◦ the payment in full of, or reasonable provision for, our liabilities (whether or not contingent,
including guaranty obligations); or
◦ Treasury funding the maximum amount under the agreement.
• Treasury also may terminate its funding commitment and void the agreement if a court
vacates, modifies, amends, conditions, enjoins, stays or otherwise affects the appointment of
the conservator or curtails the conservator’s powers.
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
Business | Conservatorship and Treasury Agreements
Rights of Debt
and MBS Holders
• Holders of our debt securities or our guaranteed MBS may file a claim in the United States
Court of Federal Claims for relief if we default on our payment obligations on those securities
and:
◦ we and the conservator fail to exercise all rights under the agreement to draw on
Treasury’s funding commitment, or
◦ Treasury fails to perform its obligations under its funding commitment and we and/or the
conservator are not diligently pursuing remedies for Treasury’s failure.
• Holders may seek to require Treasury to fund us up to:
◦ the amount necessary to cure the relevant payment defaults;
◦ the deficiency amount; or
◦ the amount of remaining funding under the agreement, whichever is the least.
Any Treasury funding provided under these circumstances would increase the liquidation
preference of the senior preferred stock.
• The terms of the agreement generally may be amended or waived; however, no such
amendment or waiver may decrease Treasury’s aggregate funding commitment or add
conditions to Treasury’s funding commitment that would adversely affect in any material
respect the holders of our debt or guaranteed MBS.
Senior Preferred
Stock Dividends
• Treasury, as the holder of the senior preferred stock, has received a total of $181.4 billion in
senior preferred stock dividends through December 31, 2024 . The dividends we have paid to
Treasury were declared by, and paid at the direction of, our conservator.
• Dividend payments we make to Treasury do not restore or increase the amount of Treasury’s
funding commitment under the agreement.
• We are currently not required to pay or accumulate new dividends to Treasury until our net
worth exceeds the amount of adjusted total capital necessary for us to meet the capital
requirements and buffers set forth in the enterprise regulatory capital framework.
• Our net worth is the amount, if any, by which our total assets (excluding Treasury’s funding
commitment and any unfunded amounts related to the commitment) exceed our total
liabilities (excluding any obligation with respect to equity securities).
• After the “capital reserve end date” (which is defined as the last day of the second
consecutive fiscal quarter during which we have had and maintained capital equal to or
exceeding the capital requirements and buffers set forth in the enterprise regulatory capital
framework), the quarterly dividends due to Treasury under the senior preferred stock will be
the lesser of (i) any quarterly increase in our net worth, and (ii) a 10% annual rate on the
then-current liquidation preference of the senior preferred stock (or 12% if we fail to pay
dividends to Treasury).
• See “Risk Factors-GSE and Conservatorship Risk” for more information on risks associated
with the resumption of dividends under the terms of the senior preferred stock.
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
Business | Conservatorship and Treasury Agreements
Liquidation
Preference
• The senior preferred stock:
◦ has no par value;
◦ had an aggregate initial liquidation preference of $1 billion ;
◦ had an aggregate liquidation preference of $212.0 billion as of December 31, 2024 ;
◦ will have an aggregate liquidation preference of $216.1 billion as of March 31, 2025 , due to
the $4.1 billion increase in our net worth during the fourth quarter of 2024 .
• The aggregate liquidation preference of the senior preferred stock is increased by:
◦ any amounts Treasury pays pursuant to its funding commitment under the agreement;
◦ any quarterly commitment fees that are payable but not paid by us;
◦ any senior preferred stock dividends that are payable but not paid to Treasury; and
◦ for each fiscal quarter through and including the capital reserve end date, an amount equal
to the increase in our net worth, if any, during the immediately prior fiscal quarter.
• The senior preferred stock ranks ahead of our common and preferred stock as to both
dividends and rights upon liquidation. If we are liquidated, the holder of the senior preferred
stock is entitled to its then-current liquidation preference before any distributions are made on
our other equity securities.
Limits on
Redemptions and
Paydowns
• We may not redeem or retire the senior preferred stock prior to the termination of Treasury’s
funding commitment under the agreement.
• We may not reduce or pay down the liquidation preference of the senior preferred stock out
of regular corporate funds, except to the extent of:
◦ accumulated and unpaid dividends previously added to the liquidation preference; and
◦ quarterly commitment fees previously added to the liquidation preference.
• While the senior preferred stock remains outstanding, we are required to use the net cash
proceeds of issuances of equity securities to pay down the liquidation preference of the
senior preferred stock; however, we are permitted to retain up to $70 billion in aggregate
gross cash proceeds from issuances of common stock.
• The liquidation preference of the senior preferred stock may not be paid down below $1,000
per share prior to the termination of Treasury’s funding commitment. After termination, we
may fully pay down the liquidation preference of the senior preferred stock.
Commitment Fee
• The agreement provides for the payment of an unspecified quarterly commitment fee to
Treasury to compensate it for its ongoing support under the agreement.
• Until the capital reserve end date, the periodic commitment fee will not be set, accrue, or be
payable.
• No later than the capital reserve end date, we and Treasury, in consultation with the Chair of
the Federal Reserve, will agree on the amount of the periodic commitment fee.
Covenants
The senior preferred stock purchase agreement contains covenants that prohibit us (and, in one instance, FHFA) from
taking several actions without the prior written consent of Treasury or require us to take specified actions, including the
following described in the table below.
Dividends and
Share
Repurchases
• We may not pay dividends or make other distributions on or repurchase our equity securities
(other than the senior preferred stock).
Issuances of
Equity Securities
• We may not issue equity securities, except for common stock issued:
◦ upon exercise of the warrant;
◦ as required by any pre-conservatorship agreements; and
◦ following the satisfaction of two conditions: (a) the exercise of the warrant in full, and (b)
the resolution of all currently pending significant litigation relating to the conservatorship
and the August 2012 amendment to the senior preferred stock purchase agreement.
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
Business | Conservatorship and Treasury Agreements
Termination of
Conservatorship
• Neither we nor FHFA may terminate or seek to terminate the conservatorship without the
prior consent of Treasury, other than through a mandatory receivership.
Asset
Dispositions
• We may not sell, transfer, lease or otherwise dispose of any assets, except for dispositions
for fair market value in limited circumstances, including if:
◦ the transaction is in the ordinary course of business and consistent with past practice; or
◦ the assets have a fair market value individually or in the aggregate of less than $250
million.
Subordinated
Debt
• We may not issue any subordinated debt securities.
Mortgage Assets
Limit
• We may not hold mortgage assets in excess of $225 billion ; however, we are currently
managing our business to a $202.5 billion mortgage asset cap according to FHFA
instructions.
Indebtedness
Limit
• We may not have indebtedness in excess of $270 billion .
Executive
Compensation
• We may not enter into any new compensation arrangements or increase amounts or benefits
payable under existing compensation arrangements with any of our executive officers (as
defined by SEC rules) without the consent of the FHFA Director, in consultation with the
Secretary of the Treasury.
Equitable Access
and Offers for
Single-Family
Mortgage Loans
• We may not vary our pricing or acquisition terms for single-family loans based on the
business characteristics of the seller, including the seller’s size, charter type, or volume of
business with us.
• We must offer to purchase at all times, for equivalent cash consideration and on substantially
the same terms, any single-family mortgage loan that:
◦ is of a class of loans that we then offer to acquire for inclusion in our MBS or for other non-
cash consideration;
◦ is offered by a seller that has been approved to do business with us; and
◦ has been originated and sold in compliance with our underwriting standards.
Single-Family
Loan Eligibility
Program
• We must maintain a program reasonably designed to ensure that the single-family loans we
acquire are limited to:
◦ qualified mortgages;
◦ government-backed loans;
◦ loans exempt from the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s (the “CFPB’s”) ability-to-
repay and qualified mortgage rule (other than loans secured by timeshares and home
equity lines of credit, which we are not allowed to buy);
◦ loans secured by an investment property;
◦ refinancing loans with streamlined underwriting originated in accordance with our eligibility
criteria for high loan-to-value (“LTV”) ratio refinancings;
◦ loans originated with temporary underwriting flexibilities during times of exigent
circumstances, as determined in consultation with FHFA;
◦ loans secured by manufactured housing; and
◦ such other loans that FHFA may designate that were eligible for purchase by us as of
January 2021.
Enterprise
Regulatory
Capital
Framework
• We are required to comply with the enterprise regulatory capital framework rule as amended
from time to time.
Risk
Management
Plan
• While in conservatorship, we must provide an annual risk management plan to Treasury.
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
Business | Conservatorship and Treasury Agreements
Common Stock Warrant
As a result of the senior preferred stock purchase agreement, in September 2008, we, through FHFA in its capacity as
conservator, issued to Treasury a warrant to purchase shares of our common stock equal to 79.9% of the total number
of shares of our common stock outstanding on a fully diluted basis on the date the warrant is exercised, for an exercise
price of $0.00001 per share. The warrant may be exercised in whole or in part at any time on or before September 7,
2028.
On January 2, 2025, Treasury issued a press release in which it noted that it expects FHFA, Fannie Mae and Treasury
will agree in the future to extend the September 7, 2028 expiration date of the warrant to the extent appropriate in order
to avoid any possibility of a disorderly or disruptive exit from conservatorship.
Side Letter Regarding Conservatorship Termination
On January 2, 2025, FHFA and Treasury entered into a side letter agreement in which they agreed to complete the
following actions prior to the termination of the conservatorship of Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac (other than through a
receivership):
• Public Request for Information. FHFA will issue a public request for information outlining options for the
termination of conservatorship and seek input on the potential impacts of each option on the housing market
and on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.
• FSOC Briefing. FHFA will brief the Financial Stability Oversight Council (“FSOC”) on a summary of the public
input received.
• Proposal to Treasury. No more than six months prior to seeking Treasury’s consent to terminate the
conservatorship of Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac, FHFA will provide Treasury with a specific proposal that:
◦ sets forth FHFA’s recommended approach;
◦ reflects the public input received;
◦ includes a market impact assessment describing how the recommended approach may impact the
housing market and Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac; and
◦ addresses any amendments to the senior preferred stock purchase agreement, senior preferred stock
certificate or warrant that may be required to implement the recommended approach.
• Presidential Consultation. Treasury will consult with the President prior to consenting to any request related to a
termination of conservatorship made pursuant to the senior preferred stock purchase agreement.
See “ Risk Factors - GSE and Conservatorship Risk ” for a description of the risks to our business relating to the
conservatorship, uncertainties regarding the future of our company and business, the senior preferred stock purchase
agreement, as well as the adverse effects of the conservatorship, the senior preferred stock and the warrant on the
rights of holders of our common stock and other series of preferred stock.
Legislation and Regulation
As a federally chartered financial institution, we are subject to substantial government regulation and oversight. FHFA,
our primary regulator, regulates our safety and soundness and our mission, and is also our conservator. FHFA is an
independent federal agency with general supervisory and regulatory authority over Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and the
FHLBs. The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”) and FHFA regulate us with respect to fair
lending matters, and the SEC and Treasury regulate other aspects of our business. In addition, regulations by other
agencies that affect the mortgage industry or the markets for our MBS, debt securities or credit risk transfer securities
could have a significant impact on us. See “Risk Factors-Legal and Regulatory Risk.”
Our Charter
Our charter, which is an act of Congress, sets forth our purposes and establishes the parameters under which we
operate, including specifying limitations on our business. We describe certain provisions of our charter below.
• Purposes . Our charter states that our operations should be financed by private capital to the maximum extent
feasible and authorizes us to:
◦ provide stability in the secondary market for residential mortgages;
◦ respond appropriately to the private capital market;
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
Business | Legislation and Regulation
◦ provide ongoing assistance to the secondary market for residential mortgages (including activities
relating to mortgages on housing for low- and moderate-income families involving a reasonable
economic return that may be less than the return earned on other activities) by increasing the liquidity
of mortgage investments and improving the distribution of investment capital available for residential
mortgage financing; and
◦ promote access to mortgage credit throughout the nation (including central cities, rural areas and
underserved areas) by increasing the liquidity of mortgage investments and improving the distribution
of investment capital available for residential mortgage financing.
• Loan acquisitions and conforming loan limit. We may purchase and securitize mortgage loans secured by
single-family and multifamily properties. Single-family conventional (not government-insured or government-
guaranteed) mortgage loan acquisitions are subject to an annually-adjusted maximum original principal balance
limit, known as the “conforming loan limit.” The national conforming loan limit for single-family mortgages
secured by one-unit properties is $806,500 for 2025 and was $766,550 for 2024 . Higher limits apply for single-
family mortgages secured by two- to four-unit properties and in four states and territories (Alaska, Hawaii,
Guam and the U.S. Virgin Islands). Higher limits of up to 150% of the loan limit also apply in certain high-cost
areas.
• Credit enhancement requirements. Credit enhancement is generally required on any single-family conventional
mortgage loan that we purchase or securitize that has an LTV ratio over 80% at the time of purchase. The
Charter Act provides three options for meeting this credit enhancement requirement: (1) obtain insurance or a
guaranty by a qualified insurer on the portion of the unpaid principal balance of the loan that exceeds 80% of
the value of the collateral property; (2) the seller agrees to repurchase or replace the loan in the event of
default; or (3) the seller retains at least a 10% participation interest in the loan. We primarily meet this credit
enhancement requirement by obtaining mortgage insurance.
• Additional limitations . We may not originate mortgage loans. Similarly, we may not advance funds to a
mortgage seller on an interim basis, using mortgage loans as collateral, pending the sale of the mortgages in
the secondary market.
• Exemption for our securities offerings. Our securities offerings are exempt from registration requirements under
the Securities Act of 1933. As a result, we do not file registration statements or prospectuses with the SEC for
our securities offerings. However, the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) provides that our
equity securities are not exempt securities under the Exchange Act. Consequently, we are required to file
periodic and current reports with the SEC, including annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form
10-Q, and current reports on Form 8-K.
• Exemption from specified taxes. We are exempt from taxation by states, territories, counties, municipalities and
local taxing authorities, except for taxation by those authorities on our real property. We are not exempt from
the payment of federal corporate income taxes.
Capital Requirements
FHFA’s enterprise regulatory capital framework establishes both leverage and risk-based minimum capital
requirements, as well as a requirement that we hold prescribed capital buffers above these minimum capital
requirements that can be drawn down in periods of financial stress:
• Minimum leverage capital requirement. The minimum leverage capital requirement is to maintain tier 1 capital
equal to at least 2.5% of adjusted total assets.
• Minimum risk-based capital requirements. The minimum risk-based capital requirements are to maintain
common equity tier 1 capital, tier 1 capital, and adjusted total capital equal to at least 4.5%, 6.0%, and 8.0%,
respectively, of risk-weighted assets.
• Buffer requirements. The buffer requirements consist of:
◦ a prescribed leverage buffer amount, or PLBA, that represents the amount of tier 1 capital we are
required to hold above the minimum leverage capital requirement; and
◦ a prescribed capital conservation buffer amount, or PCCBA, that consists of three risk-based capital
buffers-a stability capital buffer, a stress capital buffer and a countercyclical capital buffer-and that
must be comprised entirely of common equity tier 1 capital.
In general, once we are required to be in compliance with the capital buffers, if our capital levels fall below the
prescribed buffer amounts, we must restrict capital distributions, such as stock repurchases and dividends, as
well as discretionary bonus payments to executives, until the buffer amounts are restored.
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
Business | Legislation and Regulation
The enterprise regulatory capital framework also provides the following:
• Specific minimum risk-weights, or “floors,” on single-family and multifamily risk-weighted exposures, which can
increase the amount of capital required for loans that would otherwise have lower risk weights;
• Specific floors on the risk-weights applicable to retained portions of credit risk transfer transactions, which
decreases the capital relief obtained from these transactions;
• Risk-based capital requirements related to market risk and operational risk, in addition to credit risk;
• A requirement to publish quarterly capital reports;
• Requirements to submit capital plans to FHFA;
• Prior notice and approval requirements for certain capital actions, including capital distributions; and
• Additional elements based on U.S. banking regulations, such as the phased implementation of the advanced
approaches as an alternative to the standardized approach for measuring risk-weighted assets.
Our current capital levels are significantly below the levels that would be required under the enterprise regulatory capital
framework. As of December 31, 2024 , we had a $227 billion shortfall to our risk-based adjusted total capital
requirement, including buffers, of $190 billion , as we had an available capital deficit of $37 billion . Our capital shortfall as
of December 31, 2024 to our minimum risk-based adjusted total capital requirement excluding buffers was $146 billion .
E ven though we had positive net worth under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) of $94.7 billion as
of December 31, 2024, we had a $37 billion deficit in available capital primarily because available capital for purposes of
the enterprise regulatory capital framework excludes the stated value of the senior preferred stock of $120.8 billion . See
“ MD&A - Liquidity and Capital Management - Capital Management - Capital Requirements ” and “ Note 13, Regulatory
Capital Requirements ” for more information about our capital requirements and metrics under the enterprise regulatory
capital framework as of December 31, 2024. See “Risk Factors-GSE and Conservatorship Risk” for information on
risks relating to our capital requirements.
The enterprise regulatory capital framework has a transition period for compliance. We are currently subject to the
requirements to publish quarterly capital reports, submit capital plans to FHFA, and provide prior notice to, and obtain
approval from, FHFA for certain capital actions; however, we are not required to comply with the minimum capital
requirements or the buffer requirements while in conservatorship. The compliance date for the minimum capital
requirements will be the date of termination of our conservatorship or such later date as FHFA may order. The
compliance date for the buffer requirements will be the date of termination of our conservatorship. The compliance date
for the advanced approaches requirements is January 2028 or such later date as FHFA may order.
Stress Testing
The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”) requires certain financial
companies to conduct annual stress tests to determine whether the companies have the capital necessary to absorb
losses as a result of adverse economic conditions. Under FHFA regulations, each year we are required to conduct a
stress test using two different scenarios of financial conditions provided by FHFA-baseline and severely adverse-and
to publish a summary of our stress test results for the severely adverse scenario by August 15. In August 2024, FHFA
temporarily waived the requirement that we publish the severely adverse scenario by August 15, 2024.
Receivership and Resolution Planning
Under the GSE Act, the FHFA Director must place us into receivership if they determine that our assets are less than
our obligations (that is, we have a net worth deficit) or if we have not been paying our debts as they become due, in
either case, for a period of 60 days. FHFA has clarified that the 60-day measurement period will commence no earlier
than the SEC filing deadline for our Form 10-K or Form 10-Q for the relevant period.
Under the GSE Act we could also be put into receivership at the discretion of the FHFA Director if the statutory grounds
for the discretionary appointment of a receiver are met. This includes: a substantial dissipation of assets or earnings due
to unsafe or unsound practices; the existence of an unsafe or unsound condition to transact business; an inability to
meet our obligations in the ordinary course of business; a weakening of our condition due to unsafe or unsound
practices or conditions; critical undercapitalization; undercapitalization and no reasonable prospect of becoming
adequately capitalized; the likelihood of losses that will deplete substantially all of our capital; or by consent. In the
senior preferred stock purchase agreement, as amended in January 2025, FHFA agreed that it would not exercise this
discretionary authority to place us into receivership without Treasury’s prior written consent.
FHFA’s resolution planning rule requires that we develop a plan for submission to FHFA that would assist FHFA’s
planning for our rapid and orderly resolution if FHFA is appointed as our receiver. The rule also addresses procedural
requirements regarding the frequency and timing for submission of resolution plans to FHFA.
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
Business | Legislation and Regulation
The appointment of FHFA as receiver would immediately terminate the conservatorship. Placement into receivership
would likely have a material adverse effect on holders of our common stock and preferred stock, and could have a
material adverse effect on holders of our debt securities, Fannie Mae MBS and credit risk transfer securities. Should we
be placed into receivership, different assumptions would be required to determine the carrying value of our assets,
which would likely lead to substantially different financial results. For more information on the risks to our business
relating to receivership and uncertainties regarding the future of our business, see “ Risk Factors - GSE and
Conservatorship Risk .”
Portfolio Standards
The GSE Act requires FHFA to establish standards governing our portfolio holdings, to ensure that they are backed by
sufficient capital and consistent with our mission and safe and sound operations. FHFA is also required to monitor our
portfolio and, in some circumstances, may require us to dispose of or acquire assets. In 2010, FHFA adopted, as the
standard for our portfolio holdings, the mortgage assets limit specified in the senior preferred stock purchase agreement
described under “ Conservatorship and Treasury Agreements - Treasury Agreements - Covenants ,” as it may be
amended from time to time. The rule is effective for as long as we remain subject to the senior preferred stock purchase
agreement.
Affordable Housing Allocations
The GSE Act requires us to set aside in each fiscal year an amount equal to 4.2 basis points for each dollar of the
unpaid principal balance of our new business purchases and to pay this amount to specified HUD and Treasury funds in
support of affordable housing. We are prohibited from passing through the cost of these allocations to the originators of
the mortgage loans that we purchase or securitize. See “ Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director
Independence - Transactions with Related Persons -Transactions with Treasury-Treasury Interest in Affordable
Housing Allocations” for information on our contribution for 2024 new business purchases. From our initial payment
under this requirement in 2016 through our anticipated payment in early 2025, we will have paid a total of $3.0 billion to
these HUD and Treasury funds.
Housing Goals
Our housing goals, which are established by FHFA in accordance with the GSE Act, r equire that a specified portion of
mortgage loans we acqui re meet specified standards relating to affordability or location.
As described in “ Risk Factors - GSE and Conservatorship Risk ,” the actions we may take to meet our housing goals, as
well as our duty to serve underserved markets described below, may materially adversely affect our business, results of
operations and financial condition.
Single-Family Housing Goals
For single-family housing goals, our acquisitions are measured against the lower of benchmarks set by FHFA or the
level of goal-eligible originations in the primary mortgage market. The single-family benchmarks are expressed as a
percentage of the total number of goal-eligible single-family mortgages acquired each year.
2023 and 2024 Single-Family Housing Goals
In October 2024 , FHFA determined that we met four of our six 2023 single-family housing goals and subgoals. FHFA
determined that we missed the single-family low-income home purchase goal and the single-family very low-income
home purchase goal. FHFA also determined that the two missed single-family goals were not feasible for us to achieve
for 2023, considering our financial condition, macroeconomic conditions, feedback from stakeholders during the year,
and the liquidity and stability of the housing market. As a result, we were not required to submit a housing plan based on
our failure to meet these two goals for 2023.
The table below displays more information about our 2023 single-family housing goals and our performance against
these goals. FHFA’s single-family housing goal benchmarks for 2024 are the same as those for 2023 noted in the table
below, other than the low-income areas home purchase goal, which is set on an annual basis as described in footnote 4
to the table.
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
Business | Legislation and Regulation
2023 Single-Family Housing Goals Performance (1)
FHFA
Benchmark
Single-
Family
Market
Level
Result
Low-income home purchase goal (2)
%
26.3
%
26.1
%
Very low-income home purchase goal (3)
6.5
6.0
Low-income areas home purchase goal (4)
28.1
28.1
Minority census tracts home purchase subgoal (5)
12.2
12.6
Low-income census tracts home purchase subgoal (6)
9.8
9.3
Low-income refinance goal (7)
40.3
38.4
(1) The FHFA benchmarks and our results are expressed as a percentage of the total number of goal-eligible single-family mortgages
acquired during the year. The single-family market level is the percentage of goal-eligible single-family mortgages originated in the primary
mortgage market during the year.
(2) Home purchase mortgages on single-family, owner-occupied properties to borrowers with incomes no greater than 80% of area median
income.
(3) Home purchase mortgages on single-family, owner-occupied properties to borrowers with incomes no greater than 50% of area median
income.
(4) The sum of (a) mortgages meeting the criteria for the minority census tracts subgoal described in footnote 5 below, (b) mortgages meeting
the criteria for the low-income census tracts subgoal described in footnote 6 below, and (c) home purchase mortgages on single-family,
owner-occupied properties to borrowers with incomes no greater than 100% of area median income who are located in federally-declared
disaster areas. FHFA sets the low-income areas home purchase goal benchmark annually. For 2024 , FHFA has set the low-income areas
home purchase goal benchmark at 19%.
(5) Home purchase mortgages on single-family, owner-occupied properties to borrowers with incomes no greater than 100% of area median
income in minority census tracts. Minority census tracts are those that have a minority population of at least 30% and a median income of
less than 100% of area median income.
(6) (i) Home purchase mortgages on single-family, owner-occupied properties to borrowers (regardless of income) in low-income census tracts
that are not minority census tracts, and (ii) home purchase mortgages on single-family, owner-occupied properties to borrowers with
incomes greater than 100% of area median income in low-income census tracts that are also minority census tracts. Low income census
tracts are those where the median income is no greater than 80% of area median income.
(7) Refinance mortgages on single-family, owner-occupied properties to borrowers with incomes no greater than 80% of area median income.
We believe we met all of our 2024 single-family housing goal benchmarks other than the low-income home purchase
benchmark and the very low-income home purchase benchmark. We are in compliance with the single-family housing
goals if we meet either the benchmarks or market share measures, so we may still meet our goals. FHFA will make a
final determination regarding our 2024 single-family housing goals performance later in the year, after the release of
data reported under the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act.
If we do not meet our 2024 housing goals, FHFA will determine whether the goals were feasible. If FHFA finds that our
goals were feasible, we may become subject to a housing plan that could require us to take additional steps that could
have an adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition. The housing plan must describe the actions
we would take to meet the goal in the next calendar year and be approved by FHFA. The potential penalties for failure
to comply with housing plan requirements include a cease-and-desist order and civil money penalties.
2025-2027 Single-Family Housing Goals
In December 2024, FHFA published a final rule establishing single-family and multifamily housing goals for Fannie Mae
and Freddie Mac for 2025 through 2027.
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
Business | Legislation and Regulation
The table below sets forth the single-family housing goal benchmarks for 2025 through 2027.
2025-2027 Single-Family Housing Goals
FHFA Benchmark
Level (1)
Low-income home purchase goal
%
Very low-income home purchase goal
Low-income areas home purchase goal
TBD (2)
Minority census tracts home purchase subgoal
Low-income census tracts home purchase subgoal
Low-income refinance goal
(1) The FHFA benchmarks are expressed as a percentage of the total number of goal-eligible single-family mortgages acquired during the
year. See the “ 2023 Single-Family Housing Goals Performance” table above for the definitions of each housing goal and subgoal.
(2) FHFA sets the low-income areas home purchase goal benchmark annually and has not yet set this benchmark for 2025, 2026 or 2027.
FHFA’s final rule establishing 2025-2027 housing goals established new measurement buffers to help determine
whether a housing plan would be required for failing to meet certain single-family housing goals during this period.
Under the rule, FHFA generally would not require that we submit a housing plan if our performance meets or exceeds
the market level for the goal minus a specified measurement buffer; however, if we fail to meet one of the applicable
goals in both 2025 and 2026, the measurement buffer will not apply to that goal in 2027. The measurement buffers are:
(i) 1.3 percentage points for the low-income home purchase goal; (ii) 0.5 percentage points for the very low-income
home purchase goal; and (iii) 1.3 percentage points for the low-income refinance goal. In the adopting release for the
rule, FHFA noted that these measurement buffers will be in place for the 2025-2027 housing goals period due to the
heightened uncertainty in macroeconomic conditions and the difficult mortgage market that is currently forecasted for
2025-2027.
Multifamily Housing Goals
Our multifamily housing goals are based on the percentage share of the goal-eligible units in our annual multifamily loan
acquisitions that are affordable to each income category.
2023 and 2024 Multifamily Housing Goals
In October 2024 , FHFA determined that we met all of our 2023 multifamily housing goals and subgoals.
The table below displays more information about our 2023 multifamily housing goals and our performance against these
goals. Our multifamily housing goals for 2024 are the same as those for 2023.
2023 Multifamily Housing Goals Performance
Goal
Result
(Percentage share of goal-eligible units)
Low-income goal (1)
%
76.3
%
Very low-income subgoal (2)
18.7
Small multifamily low-income subgoal (3)
2.5
3.2
(1) Affordable to low-income families, defined as families with incomes less than or equal to 80% of area median income.
(2) Affordable to very low-income families, defined as families with incomes less than or equal to 50% of area median income.
(3) Units in small multifamily properties (defined as properties with 5 to 50 units) affordable to low-income families.
We believe we met all of our 2024 multifamily housing goals. FHFA will make a final determination regarding our 2024
multifamily housing goals performance later in the year.
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
Business | Legislation and Regulation
2025-2027 Multifamily Housing Goals
The table below sets forth the multifamily housing goal benchmarks for 2025 through 2027.
2025-2027 Multifamily Housing Goals
FHFA Benchmark
Level (1)
(Percentage share of goal-
eligible units)
Low-income goal
%
Very low-income goal
Small multifamily low-income subgoal
(1) See the “ 2023 Multifamily Housing Goals Performance” table above for the definitions of each housing goal and subgoal.
Duty to Serve Underserved Markets
The GSE Act requires that we serve very low-, low-, and moderate-income families in three specified underserved
markets: manufactured housing, affordable housing preservation and rural housing. FHFA requires that we adopt an
underserved markets plan for each underserved market covering a three-year period that sets forth the activities and
objectives we will undertake to meet our duty to serve in that market.
FHFA has also established an annual process for evaluating our achievements under the plans, with performance
results to be reported to Congress annually. If FHFA determines that we failed to meet the requirements of an
underserved markets plan, FHFA may require us to submit a housing plan for FHFA approval that could require us to
take additional steps. In October 2024, FHFA reported its determination that we complied with our 2023 duty-to-serve
requirements. We believe we also met our 2024 duty-to-serve obligations. In 2025, FHFA will determine our
performance with respect to our 2024 duty-to-serve obligations.
Fair Lending
The GSE Act requires the Secretary of HUD to assure that we meet our fair lending obligations. Among other things,
HUD periodically reviews and comments on our underwriting and appraisal guidelines to ensure consistency with the
Fair Housing Act. In addition, FHFA, as our primary regulator, has broad authority to monitor and enforce our
compliance with fair lending laws and engages in comprehensive fair lending oversight of our activities. In 2021, FHFA
and HUD entered into a memorandum of understanding regarding fair housing and fair lending coordination. Among
other things, the memorandum of understanding allows HUD and FHFA to coordinate on investigations, compliance
reviews, and ongoing monitoring to ensure our compliance with the Fair Housing Act.
In May 2024, FHFA published a final rule relating to fair lending, fair housing and other matters. The provisions of the
rule applicable to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac became effective in July 2024. The rule codifies in regulation, among
other things, much of FHFA’s existing practices and programs regarding fair housing and fair lending oversight of Fannie
Mae, Freddie Mac and the FHLBs. The rule also added oversight of unfair or deceptive acts or practices under Section
5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act to FHFA’s fair housing and fair lending oversight programs, established
responsibilities for the regulated entities’ Boards of Directors relating to fair lending, fair housing, and the prohibition on
unfair or deceptive acts or practices, and added other requirements.
Guaranty Fees and Pricing
Our guaranty fees and pricing are subject to regulatory, legislative and conservatorship requirements, including FHFA
guidance and instruction. These requirements include the following:
• Upfront Fees. FHFA, as conservator, must approve changes to the single-family national loan-level price
adjustments (or upfront fees) that we charge and can direct us to make other changes to our guaranty fee
pricing for new single-family acquisitions.
• Base Fees . We can change our base single-family guaranty fee pricing, subject to minimum base guaranty fees
set by FHFA. These minimum fees generally apply to our acquisitions of 30-year and 15-year single-family
fixed-rate loans in lender swap transactions. FHFA has instructed us to provide at least 60 days’ notice of any
single-family base guaranty fee increase of more than 1 basis point. In January 2025, FHFA instructed us to not
implement any broad-based increases to base single-family guaranty fees until further notice.
• Return Targets. For new single-family and multifamily acquisitions, FHFA has instructed us to meet minimum
return on equity targets based on the enterprise regulatory capital framework requirements (including buffers)
assuming those requirements were in effect today. Our minimum single-family and multifamily acquisition return
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
Business | Legislation and Regulation
thresholds are currently aligned with Freddie Mac’s thresholds. FHFA also has instructed us to establish a long-
term target for returns at the enterprise level. These return targets affect the guaranty fees we charge.
• TCCA Fees . Pursuant to the Temporary Payroll Tax Cut Continuation Act of 2011, as amended by the
Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act of 2021, until October 1, 2032, we are required to collect 10 basis points
in guaranty fees on all single-family mortgages delivered to us on or after April 1, 2012 and pay these amounts
to Treasury. We include these amounts in net interest income and recognize the expense in legislative
assessments in our consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive income. See “ Certain
Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence - Transactions with Related Persons -
Transactions with Treasury - Obligation to Pay TCCA Fees to Treasury ” for additional discussion of our TCCA
fees.
• UMBS ® . Our ability to change our single-family guaranty fee pricing is limited by the FHFA rule described in
“FHFA Rule on Uniform Mortgage-Backed Securities” below.
In addition, under the senior preferred stock purchase agreement, we are not permitted to charge different single-family
guaranty fees based on the business characteristics of the seller, including their size, charter type or volume of business
with us.
New Products and Activities
The GSE Act requires us to notify FHFA before undertaking a new activity and to obtain prior approval before offering a
new product to the market, subject to certain exclusions. The FHFA rule implementing these provisions established a
process for the review of new activities and products by FHFA and defined a new product as any new activity that FHFA
determines merits public notice and comment about whether it is in the public interest. FHFA may approve a new
product proposed by us if FHFA determines that the new product is authorized under our charter, in the public interest
and consistent with safety and soundness. FHFA may place conditions or limitations on a new product or activity.
Executive Compensation
The amount and type of compensation we may pay our executives is subject to legal and regulatory restrictions,
particularly while we are in conservatorship, as described in “ Executive Compensation - Compensation Discussion and
Analysis - Restrictions on Executive Compensation .”
FHFA Rule on Uniform Mortgage-Backed Securities
We and Freddie Mac issue single-family uniform mortgage-backed securities, or “UMBS.” We and Freddie Mac are
required to align our programs, policies and practices that affect the prepayment rates of to-be-announced (“TBA”)
market-eligible MBS pursuant to an FHFA rule. The rule is intended to ensure that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac’s
programs, policies and practices that have a material effect on MBS cash flows remain aligned regardless of whether
we and Freddie Mac are in conservatorship. The rule provides a non-exhaustive list of covered programs, policies and
practices, including: single-family guaranty fees; eligibility standards for sellers, servicers, and mortgage insurers;
distressed loan servicing requirements; removal of mortgage loans from securities; servicer compensation; and
proposals that could materially change the credit risk profile of our single-family mortgages. FHFA may mandate
additional alignment efforts in the future that affect our business and our MBS. As a result of this rule, we must evaluate
each potential change to our programs, policies and practices, and if the change may cause misalignment, submit the
change to FHFA for evaluation and approval.
SEC Final Rule Prohibiting Conflicts of Interest in Certain Securitizations
In December 2023, the SEC published a final rule prohibiting conflicts of interest in certain securitization transactions.
The rule prohibits securitization participants from engaging in specified “conflicted transactions” with respect to an
asset-backed security for a period ending one year after the initial sale of that security. Securitization participants will be
required to comply with the rule effective in June 2025.
The final rule clarified that our credit risk transfer transactions are not prohibited transactions under the rule, as they fall
within an exception to the rule; however, we will be required to establish, implement, maintain, and enforce an internal
compliance program that is reasonably designed to ensure our compliance with the conditions of the exception.
Multifamily Residential Lease Standards Policy
In 2024, FHFA established a new multifamily residential lease standards policy that will be applicable to multifamily
properties financed with mortgages backed by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Under the policy, covered multifamily
borrowers who receive financing from Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac on or after February 28, 2025 will be required to
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
Business | Legislation and Regulation
provide tenants: (1) a 30-day notice of a rent increase for the next lease term, (2) a 30-day notice of a lease term’s
expiration, and (3) a minimum 5-day grace period for late rent payments before fees or other penalties can be charged.
Quality Control Standards for Automated Valuation Models Final Rule
In August 2024, FHFA and five other federal regulatory agencies published a final rule to implement the quality control
standards mandated by the Dodd-Frank Act for the use of automated valuation models (referred to as “AVMs”) by
mortgage originators and secondary market issuers in determining the collateral worth of a mortgage secured by a
consumer’s principal dwelling. Under the final rule, institutions that engage in certain credit decisions or securitization
determinations must adopt policies, practices, procedures and control systems to: ensure that AVMs used in these
transactions to determine the value of mortgage collateral adhere to quality control standards designed to ensure a high
level of confidence in the estimates produced by AVMs; protect against the manipulation of data; seek to avoid conflicts
of interest; require random sample testing and reviews; and comply with applicable nondiscrimination laws. The rule will
become effective on October 1, 2025.
Where You Can Find Additional Information
Our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and all other SEC
reports and amendments to those reports, are available free of charge on our website as soon as reasonably
practicable after we electronically file the material with, or furnish it to, the SEC. Our website address is
www.fanniemae.com. Materials that we file with the SEC are also available from the SEC’s website, www.sec.gov. You
may also request copies of any filing from us, at no cost, by calling the Fannie Mae Investor Relations & Marketing
Helpline at 1-800-2FANNIE (1-800-232-6643).
References in this report to our website or to the SEC’s website do not incorporate information appearing on those
websites unless we explicitly state that we are incorporating the information.
Forward-Looking Statements
This report includes statements that constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the
Exchange Act. In addition, we and our senior management may from time to time make forward-looking statements in
our other filings with the SEC, our other publicly available written statements and orally to analysts, investors, the news
media and others. Forward-looking statements often include words such as “expect,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “plan,”
“believe,” “seek,” “estimate,” “forecast,” “project,” “would,” “should,” “could,” “likely,” “may,” “will” or similar words.
Examples of forward-looking statements in this report include, among others, statements relating to our beliefs and
expectations regarding the following matters:
• economic, mortgage market and housing market conditions (including expectations regarding economic growth,
home price growth, multifamily property value growth, the unemployment rate, loan origination volumes,
interest rates and multifamily property net operating income), the factors that will affect those conditions, and
the impact of those conditions on our business and financial results;
• the impact of hedge accounting on the volatility of our financial results;
• our future net worth;
• the future aggregate liquidation preference of our senior preferred stock;
• our future dividend payments on the senior preferred stock;
• our business plans and strategies, and their impact, including our expectations and beliefs relating to: our use
of, and the potential benefits and risks of, artificial intelligence; and our approach to human capital
management, including our succession planning approach;
• the impact of changes in our pricing;
• the factors that will attract private investors in our equity securities and the impact of such factors on our ability
to raise sufficient capital to exit conservatorship and on our business;
• the credit performance of the loans in our guaranty book of business (including future loan delinquencies and
foreclosures ) and the factors that will affect such performance;
• the effects of our credit risk transfer transactions, as well as the factors that will affect our engagement in future
credit risk transfer transactions;
• the factors that will affect the competition we face;
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
Business | Forward-Looking Statements
• how we intend to repay our debt obligations and the factors that will affect our access to debt funding;
• the factors that will affect our credit ratings and the impact of changes to our credit ratings;
• the impact of legislation and regulation on our business, financial results or financial condition;
• the impact of the adoption of new accounting guidance;
• our housing goals and duty-to-serve performance;
• our payments to HUD and Treasury funds under the GSE Act;
• legal and regulatory proceedings;
• the risks to our business;
• the risk of default or loss relating to specified counterparties;
• climate change and its impact; and
• cyber attacks and other cybersecurity threats, and the impact of our cybersecurity defense tools and systems
safeguards.
Forward-looking statements reflect our management’s current expectations, forecasts or predictions of future conditions,
events or results based on various assumptions and management’s estimates of trends and economic conditions in the
markets in which we are active and that otherwise impact our business plans. Forward-looking statements are not
guarantees of future performance. By their nature, forward-looking statements are subject to significant risks and
uncertainties and changes in circumstances. Our actual results and financial condition may differ, possibly materially,
from the anticipated results and financial condition indicated in these forward-looking statements.
T here are a number of factors that could cause actual conditions, events or results to differ materially from those
described in our forward-looking statements, including, among others, the follo wing:
• growth, deterioration and the overall health and stability of the U.S. economy, including U.S. gross domestic
product (“GDP”), unemployment rates, personal income, inflation and other indicators thereof;
• deterioration in a specific sector of the U.S. economy or in one or more regional areas of the United States;
• future interest rates and credit spreads;
• the timing and level of, as well as regional variation in, home price changes;
• the size and our share of the U.S. mortgage market (including the volume of mortgage originations) and the
factors that affect them, including population growth and household formation;
• changes in fiscal or monetary policy of the U.S. or other countries, and the impact of such changes on domestic
and international financial markets;
• domestic, regional and global political risks and uncertainties, including the impact of the Russian war in
Ukraine and tensions between China and Taiwan;
• developments that may be difficult to predict, including: market conditions that result in changes in our deferred
guaranty fee income or changes in net interest income from our portfolios; fluctuations in the estimated fair
value of our assets and liabilities; and developments that affect our loss reserves, such as changes in interest
rates or home prices;
• disruptions or instability in the housing and credit markets;
• changes in the demand for Fannie Mae MBS, our debt securities or our credit risk transfer securities, in general
or from one or more major groups of investors;
• constraints on our entry into new credit risk transfer transactions;
• a decrease in our credit ratings;
• limitations on our ability to access the debt capital markets;
• the size, composition, quality and performance of our guaranty book of business and retained mortgage
portfolio;
• how long loans in our guaranty book of business remain outstanding;
• our and our competitors’ future guaranty fee pricing and the impact of that pricing on our competitive
environment and guaranty fee revenues;
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
Business | Forward-Looking Statements
• the competitive environment in which we operate, including the impact of legislative, regulatory or other
developments on levels of competition in our industry and other factors affecting our market share;
• the impact of interdependence between the single-family mortgage securitization programs of Fannie Mae and
Freddie Mac in connection with UMBS;
• significant challenges we face in retaining and hiring qualified executives and other employees;
• our conservatorship, including any changes to or termination (by receivership or otherwise) of the
conservatorship and its effect on our business;
• the investment by Treasury, including the impact of past or potential future changes to the terms of the senior
preferred stock purchase agreement, senior preferred stock and warrant, and their effect on our business,
including restrictions imposed on us by the terms of the senior preferred stock purchase agreement, the senior
preferred stock, and the warrant, as well as the extent that these or other restrictions on our business and
activities are applied to us through other mechanisms even if we cease to be subject to these agreements and
instruments;
• uncertainty regarding our future, our exit from conservatorship, and our ability to raise or earn the capital
needed to meet our capital requirements;
• the impact of the enterprise regulatory capital framework on our business and financial results;
• future legislative and regulatory requirements or changes, governmental initiatives, or executive orders
affecting us, such as the enactment of housing finance reform legislation, including changes that limit our
business activities or our footprint, impose new mandates on us, or affect our ability to change our pricing;
• future legislative and regulatory requirements or changes, governmental initiatives, or executive orders
affecting macroeconomic conditions, such as changes to trade, fiscal, or immigration policies;
• actions by FHFA, Treasury, the Federal Reserve, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (“OCC”), the
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”), the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”), HUD,
the CFPB, the SEC or other regulators, Congress, the Executive Branch, or state or local governments that
affect our business;
• changes in the structure and regulation of the financial services industry;
• the potential impact of a change in the corporate income tax rate, which we expect would affect our net income
in the quarter of enactment;
• the possibility that changes in leadership at FHFA or the Administration will result in changes that affect our
company or our business;
• actions we may be required to take by FHFA, in its role as our conservator or as our regulator, such as changes
in the type of business we do, actions relating to UMBS or our resecuritization of Freddie Mac-issued securities,
or credit risk management actions;
• limitations on our business imposed by FHFA, in its role as our conservator or as our regulator;
• adverse effects from activities we undertake to support the mortgage market and help borrowers, renters,
lenders and servicers, including actions we may take to reach additional underserved borrowers;
• a default by the United States government on its obligations;
• a shutdown of the United States government;
• significant changes in forbearance, modification and foreclosure activity;
• the volume and pace of any future nonperforming and reperforming loan sales and their impact on our financial
results and serious delinquency rates;
• changes in borrower behavior;
• actions we may take to mitigate losses, and the effectiveness of our loss mitigation strategies, management of
our REO inventory and pursuit of contractual remedies;
• environmental disasters, terrorist attacks, widespread health emergencies or pandemics, infrastructure failures,
or other disruptive or catastrophic events;
• earthquakes or other natural disasters, including those for which we may be uninsured or under-insured or that
may affect our counterparties or the hazard insurers insuring properties underlying our guaranty book of
business;
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
Business | Forward-Looking Statements
• severe weather events, fires, floods, wind or other climate-related events or impacts, including those for which
we may be uninsured or under-insured or that may affect our counterparties or the hazard insurers insuring
properties underlying our guaranty book of business, and other climate-related risks;
• defaults by one or more of our counterparties or by the hazard insurers insuring properties underlying our
guaranty book of business;
• resolution or settlement agreements we may enter into with our counterparties;
• our need to rely on third parties to achieve some of our corporate objectives, including our reliance on
mortgage servicers;
• our reliance on CSS and the common securitization platform CSS operates for a majority of our single-family
securitization activities; provisions in the CSS limited liability company agreement that permit FHFA to appoint
members to the CSS Board of Managers, which limit the ability of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to control
decisions of the Board; and changes FHFA may require in our relationship with or in our support of CSS;
• the effectiveness of our risk management processes and related controls;
• the effectiveness of our business resiliency plans and systems;
• the stability and adequacy of the systems and infrastructure that impact our operations, including ours and
those of CSS, our other counterparties and other third parties;
• our reliance on models and future updates we make to our models, including the data and assumptions used
by these models;
• cyber attacks or other cybersecurity breaches or threats impacting us, the third parties with which we do
business or our regulators;
• changes in GAAP, guidance by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”), SEC guidance, and our
accounting policies; and
• the other factors described in “Risk Factors.”
Readers are cautioned not to unduly rely on the forward-looking statements we make and to place these forward-
looking statements into proper context by carefully considering the factors identified above and those discussed in “Risk
Factors” in this report. These forward-looking statements are representative only as of the date they are made, and we
undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statement as a result of new information, future events or
otherwise, except as required under the federal securities laws.

---

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
Item 1A. Risk Factors
The risks we face could materially adversely affect our business, results of operations, financial condition, liquidity and
net worth, and could cause our actual results to differ materially from our past results or the results contemplated by any
forward-looking statements we make. We believe the risks described below and in the other sections of this report
referenced below are the most significant we face; however, these are not the only risks we face. We face additional
risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently believe are immaterial. Refer to “ MD&A -Risk
Management,” “ MD&A - Single-Family Business ” and “ MD&A -Multifamily Business” for more detailed descriptions of
the primary risks to our business and how we seek to manage those risks.
Risk Factors Summary
The summary of risks below provides an overview of the principal risks we are exposed to in the normal course of our
business activities. This summary does not contain all of the information that may be important to you, and you should
read the more detailed discussion of risks that follows this summary.
GSE and Conservatorship Risk
• The future of our company is uncertain.
• We are significantly undercapitalized and may be unable to achieve full capitalization.
• FHFA, as our conservator, controls our business activities. We may be required by FHFA to take actions that
are difficult to implement, reduce our profitability or expose us to additional risk.
• Our business activities are significantly affected by the senior preferred stock purchase agreement.
• Our regulator is authorized or required to place us into receivership under specified conditions, which would
result in our liquidation. Amounts recovered by our receiver may not be sufficient to pay claims outstanding
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
Risk Factors | Risk Factors Summary
against us, repay the liquidation preference of our preferred stock or to provide any proceeds to common
stockholders.
• Our business and results of operations may be materially adversely affected if we are unable to retain and
recruit well-qualified executives and other employees. The conservatorship, the uncertainty of our future, and
compensation limits put us at a disadvantage in competing for talent.
• Our higher capital requirements relative to our primary competitor could materially negatively affect our
business.
• Pursuing our housing mission requirements may materially adversely affect our business, results of operations
and financial condition.
• The conservatorship and agreements with Treasury adversely affect our common and preferred stockholders.
• The liquidity and market value of our MBS could be materially adversely affected by developments in the
secondary mortgage market or the UMBS market, or by legislative, regulatory or industry developments, which
could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial results and financial condition.
• Our issuance of UMBS and structured securities backed by Freddie Mac-issued securities exposes us to
operational and counterparty credit risk.
• Our reliance on CSS and the common securitization platform exposes us to significant third-party risk.
• We are limited in our ability to diversify our business.
• An active trading market in our equity securities may cease to exist, which would adversely affect the market
price and liquidity of our common and preferred stock.
Credit Risk
• We may incur significant future provisions for credit losses and write-offs on the loans in our book of business,
which could materially adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.
• The credit enhancements we use provide only limited protection against potential future credit losses. These
transactions also increase our expenses.
• We may suffer material losses if borrowers suffer property damage as a result of hazards for which the
borrowers have no or insufficient insurance.
• The occurrence of major natural or other disasters in the United States or its territories could materially
increase our provision for credit losses and our write-offs.
• Our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected by impacts
related to climate change.
• One or more of our institutional counterparties may fail to fulfill their contractual obligations to us, resulting in
financial losses, business disruption and decreased ability to manage risk.
• Our financial condition and results of operations may be materially adversely affected if mortgage servicers fail
to perform their obligations to us.
• We may incur losses as a result of claims under our mortgage insurance policies not being paid in full or at all.
• We could experience additional financial losses due to mortgage fraud.
Operational and Model Risk
• A failure in our operational systems or infrastructure, or those of third parties or the financial services industry,
could cause significant disruptions, materially adversely affect our business, liquidity, results of operations and
financial condition, and materially harm our reputation.
• A cyber attack or other cybersecurity incident relating to our systems or those of third parties with which we do
business could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial results and financial condition.
• Material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting could result in errors in our reported results
or disclosures that are not complete or accurate.
• Failure of our models to produce reliable outputs may materially adversely affect our ability to manage risk and
make effective business decisions, as well as create regulatory and reputational risk.
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
Risk Factors | Risk Factors Summary
Liquidity Risk
• Limitations on our ability to access the debt capital markets could have a material adverse effect on our ability
to fund our operations, and our liquidity contingency plans may be difficult or impossible to execute during a
sustained liquidity crisis.
• A decrease in the credit ratings on our senior unsecured debt could increase our borrowing costs and have an
adverse effect on our ability to issue debt on reasonable terms, particularly if such a decrease were not based
on a similar action on the credit ratings of the U.S. government. A decrease in our credit ratings also could
require that we post additional collateral for our derivatives contracts.
Market and Industry Risk
• Changes in interest rates or limitations on our ability to manage interest-rate risk successfully could materially
adversely affect our financial results and condition, and increase our interest-rate risk.
• Changes in spreads could materially impact the fair value of our net assets, and therefore our results of
operations and net worth.
• Our business and financial results are affected by general economic conditions, including home prices and
employment trends, and changes in economic conditions or financial markets may materially adversely affect
our business and financial condition. Volatility or uncertainty in global, regional or domestic political conditions
also can significantly affect economic conditions and financial markets.
Legal and Regulatory Risk
• Regulatory changes in the financial services industry and shifts in monetary policy may negatively impact our
business.
• Legislative, regulatory or judicial actions, and changes in interpretations of laws, regulations or accounting
standards, could negatively impact our business, results of operations, financial condition, liquidity or net worth.
• We face risk of non-compliance with our legal and regulatory obligations, which could have a material adverse
impact on our business, financial results and financial condition.
• Our business and financial results could be materially adversely affected by legal or regulatory proceedings.
General Risk
• In many cases, our accounting policies and methods, which are fundamental to how we report our financial
condition and results of operations, require management to make judgments and estimates about matters that
are inherently uncertain. Management also relies on models in making these estimates.
GSE and Conservatorship Risk
T he future of our company is uncertain.
The company faces an uncertain future, including how long we will continue to exist in our current form, the extent of our
role in the market, the level of government support of our business, how long we will be in conservatorship, what form
we will have, what ownership interest, if any, our current common and preferred stockholders will hold in us after the
conservatorship is terminated, and whether we will continue to exist following conservatorship. The conservatorship has
been in place since 2008, is indefinite in duration, and the timing, conditions and likelihood of our emerging from
conservatorship are uncertain. Our conservatorship could terminate through a receivership. Actions taken in connection
with the termination of our conservatorship could substantially dilute or eliminate any value associated with our existing
common stock and preferred stock.
Termination of the conservatorship, other than in connection with a mandatory receivership, requires Treasury’s consent
under the senior preferred stock purchase agreement. In addition, FHFA and Treasury have agreed to undertake certain
actions prior to terminating the conservatorship, other than in connection with receivership.
We believe that our return on equity based on our regulatory capital requirements may not be sufficient to attract private
investors in our equity securities, which we believe limits our options to raise sufficient capital to exit conservatorship.
Increasing our returns to a level sufficient to attract private equity investors may require increases in our pricing or
changes in other aspects of our business that could affect our competitive position, our loan acquisition volumes and
market share, the mix of loans that we acquire or the type of business we do, including the level of support we provide
to low- and moderate-income borrowers and renters. Our ability to increase our returns may be limited given our
business model, our role in the U.S. housing market, and the limitations on our ability to change our guaranty fees and
pricing described in “Business-Legislation and Regulation-Guaranty Fees and Pricing.” In addition, we believe that
Treasury’s ownership of our senior preferred stock and Treasury’s potential additional substantial equity ownership in
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
Risk Factors | GSE and Conservatorship Risk
our company, along with restrictions imposed on our business and future dividends and fees we will be required to pay
to Treasury under the current terms of the senior preferred stock purchase agreement, reduces our attractiveness to
potential equity investors.
If we exit conservatorship, specified regulatory exemptions that currently apply to us or our securities would no longer
apply, such as the rule implementing the Dodd-Frank Act’s credit risk retention requirement and the Federal Reserve
Board’s single-counterparty credit limits rule. The expiration of these exemptions could result in significant changes to
our business and materially adversely affect our financial results and condition.
The prior Trump Administration was considering plans relating to reform of the housing finance system and our eventual
exit from conservatorship. As of the date of this filing, the new Trump Administration has not issued plans for housing
finance reform or the future of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac . The Administration and Congress may consider housing
finance reforms or legislation that could result in significant changes in our structure and role in the future, including
proposals that would result in Fannie Mae’s liquidation or dissolution. In addition, Congress may consider legislation,
federal agencies such as FHFA may consider regulations or administrative actions, or the Administration may issue
executive orders that directly or indirectly increase the competition we face, reduce our market share, further restrict our
ability to change our loan pricing, further expand our obligations to provide funds to Treasury, further constrain our
business operations, or subject us to other obligations or restrictions that may adversely affect our business. We cannot
predict the timing or content of housing finance reform legislation or other legislation, regulations or administrative
actions that will impact our activities, nor can we predict the extent of such impact.
We are significantly undercapitalized and may be unable to achieve full capitalization.
Our current capital levels are negative and are significantly below the levels required under the enterprise regulatory
capital framework. We may be unable to achieve full capitalization under the enterprise regulatory capital framework, as
dividends to Treasury on the senior preferred stock may resume before we reach full capitalization. Our efforts to build
capital to meet our requirements can be significantly affected by the amount, type and pricing of our new loan
acquisitions, which can drive increases in our required capital that offset or even outpace increases in our available
capital. For more information on the enterprise regulatory capital framework and our capital metrics as of December 31,
2024, see “ Business - Legislation and Regulation - Capital Requirements ” and “ MD&A - Liquidity and Capital
Management - Capital Management - Capital Requirements .”
FHFA, as our conservator, controls our business activities. We may be required by FHFA to take actions that
are difficult to implement, reduce our profitability or expose us to additional risk.
In conservatorship, our business is not managed with a strategy to maximize stockholder value. Our directors owe their
fiduciary duties of care and loyalty solely to the conservator. Thus, while we are in conservatorship, the Board has no
fiduciary duties to the company or its stockholders. The Supreme Court has interpreted FHFA’s authority as conservator
expansively, noting that “when the FHFA acts as a conservator, it may aim to rehabilitate the regulated entity in a way
that, while not in the best interests of the regulated entity, is beneficial to the Agency and, by extension, the public it
serves.” As conservator, FHFA can direct us to enter into contracts or enter into contracts on our behalf, and generally
has the power to transfer or sell any of our assets or liabilities.
Our strategic direction is subject to FHFA review and approval. FHFA also requires us to meet specified annual
corporate performance objectives referred to as the conservatorship scorecard. We face a variety of different, and
sometimes competing, business objectives and FHFA-mandated activities, such as the initiatives we have been
pursuing under the conservatorship scorecards. FHFA has and may require us to undertake activities that are costly or
difficult to implement and that increase our operational risk. FHFA also has required us to make changes to our
business that have adversely affected our financial results and could require us to make additional changes at any time.
FHFA may require us to undertake some activities that: reduce our profitability; expose us to additional credit, market,
funding, operational, legal, and other risks; or provide additional support for the mortgage market that serves our
mission, but adversely affects our financial results.
FHFA can prevent us from engaging in business activities or transactions that we believe would benefit our business
and financial results, and from time to time has done so. For example, FHFA can both prevent us from making, and
direct us to make, changes to our guaranty fee pricing, and has currently set minimum return thresholds for our loan
acquisitions, as described in “Business-Legislation and Regulation-Guaranty Fees and Pricing.” These factors
constrain our ability to address changing market conditions, pursue certain strategic objectives, manage the mix of
loans we acquire, and compete with Freddie Mac for the acquisition of loans.
With FHFA’s broad powers as conservator, changes in leadership at FHFA, including those resulting from the recent
change in the Administration, could result in significant changes to the goals, direction and regulations that FHFA
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
Risk Factors | GSE and Conservatorship Risk
establishes for us and could have a material impact on our business and financial results. The President has the power
to remove the FHFA Director.
Our business activities are significantly affected by the senior preferred stock purchase agreement.
Even if we are released from conservatorship, we would remain subject to the terms of the senior preferred stock
purchase agreement with Treasury, under which we issued the senior preferred stock and warrant, unless those terms
are waived or amended. The senior preferred stock purchase agreement can only be waived or amended with the
consent of Treasury. The agreement includes a number of covenants that significantly restrict our business activities.
We believe these restrictions under the senior preferred stock purchase agreement adversely affect our ability to attract
capital from the private sector. For more information about the covenants in the senior preferred stock purchase
agreement, see “ Business - Conservatorship and Treasury Agreements - Treasury Agreements -Covenants.”
Our regulator is authorized or required to place us into receivership under specified conditions, which would
result in our liquidation. Amounts recovered by our receiver may not be sufficient to pay claims outstanding
against us, repay the liquidation preference of our preferred stock or to provide any proceeds to common
stockholders.
The FHFA Director is required to place us into receivership if they make a written determination that our assets are less
than our obligations or if we have not been paying our debts as they become due, in either case, for a period of 60 days
after the SEC filing deadline for any of our Form 10-Ks or Form 10-Qs. Although Treasury committed to providing us
funds in accordance with the terms of the senior preferred stock purchase agreement, if we need funding from Treasury
to avoid triggering FHFA’s obligation to place us into receivership, Treasury may not be able to provide sufficient funds
to us within the required 60 days if it has exhausted its borrowing authority, if there is a government shutdown, or if the
funding we need exceeds the amount available to us under the agreement. In addition, with the prior written consent of
Treasury, we could be put into receivership at the discretion of the FHFA Director at any time for the reasons set forth in
the GSE Act, including if our board of directors or stockholders consent to the appointment of a receiver or, if under the
definitions in the GSE Act, we are undercapitalized with no reasonable prospect of becoming adequately capitalized or
we are critically undercapitalized. Under the GSE Act, FHFA succeeded to all of the rights, titles, powers and privileges
of our board of directors and stockholders.
A receivership would terminate our conservatorship. In addition to the powers FHFA has as our conservator, the
appointment of FHFA as our receiver would terminate all rights and claims that our stockholders and creditors may have
against our assets or under our charter arising from their status as stockholders or creditors, except for their right to
payment, resolution or other satisfaction of their claims as permitted under the GSE Act. If we are placed into
receivership and do not or cannot fulfill our MBS guaranty obligations, there may be significant delays of any payments
to our MBS holders, and the MBS holders could become unsecured creditors of ours with respect to claims made under
our guaranty to the extent the mortgage collateral underlying the Fannie Mae MBS is insufficient to satisfy the claims of
the MBS holders.
In the event of a liquidation of our assets, only after payment of secured claims, administrative expenses of the receiver
and the immediately preceding conservator, other obligations of the company (other than obligations to stockholders),
and the liquidation preference of the senior preferred stock, would any liquidation proceeds be available to repay the
liquidation preference on any other series of preferred stock. Finally, only after the liquidation preference on all series of
preferred stock is repaid would any liquidation proceeds be available for distribution to the holders of our common stock.
In the event of such a liquidation, we can make no assurances that there would be sufficient proceeds to make any
distribution to holders of our preferred stock or common stock, other than to Treasury as the holder of our senior
preferred stock. As described in “ Business - Conservatorship and Treasury Agreements - Treasury Agreements -
Senior Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement and Senior Preferred Stock ,” under the current terms of the senior
preferred stock, until the capital reserve end date, the liquidation preference of the senior preferred stock increases
each quarter by the amount of the increase in our net worth, if any, during the immediately prior fiscal quarter. The
aggregate liquidation preference of the senior preferred stock was $212.0 billion as of December 31, 2024 , and we
expect it will continue to increase as we increase our net worth.
Our business and results of operations may be materially adversely affected if we are unable to retain and
recruit well-qualified executives and other employees. The conservatorship, the uncertainty of our future, and
compensation limits put us a t a disadvantage in competing for talent .
Our business is highly dependent on the talents and efforts of our executives and other employees. The
conservatorship, the uncertainty of our future, and limitations on executive compensation have had, and are likely to
continue to have, an adverse effect on our ability to retain and recruit talent. Departures in key management positions
and challenges in finding replacements could materially harm our ability to manage our business effectively, to
successfully implement strategic initiatives, and ultimately could adversely affect our financial performance.
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
Risk Factors | GSE and Conservatorship Risk
Actions taken by Congress, FHFA and Treasury to date, or that may be taken by them or other government agencies in
the future, have had and are expected to continue to have an adverse effect on our retention and recruitment of
executives. We are subject to significant restrictions on the amount and type of compensation we may pay as a result of
the senior preferred stock purchase agreement and conservatorship, as described in more detail in “ Executive
Compensation - Compensation Discussion and Analysis - Restrictions on Executive Compensation.” For example,
during conservatorship direct annual compensation for our chief executive officer (“CEO”) role is limited to base salary
at an annual rate of $600,000 and our senior executives are prohibited from receiving bonuses. The cap on our CEO
compensation continues to make retention and succession planning for this position difficult, and it may make it difficult
to attract qualified candidates for this critical role in the future. As a result of the restrictions on our compensation, we
have not been able to incent and reward excellent performance and appropriate risk taking with compensation
structures that provide upside potential to our executives, which places us at a disadvantage compared to many other
companies in attracting and retaining executives.
In addition to restrictions on our compensation, our ability to retain and recruit executives and other employees has
been and may continue to be adversely affected by the uncertainty of potential action by the Administration or Congress
with respect to our business, as described in the risk factors above.
We face competition from the financial services and technology industries, and from businesses outside of these
industries, for qualified executives and other employees. If future competition for executive and employee talent remains
strong and if we are unable to attract, promote and retain executives and other employees with the necessary skills and
talent, we would face increased risks for operational failures. In the future, if there are several high-level departures at
approximately the same time, our ability to conduct our business could be materially adversely affected, which could
have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.
Our higher capital requirements relative to our primary competitor could materially negatively affect our
business .
We have higher capital requirements than our primary competitor, Freddie Mac, driven primarily by our larger share of
U.S. residential mortgage debt outstanding. These higher capital requirements relative to Freddie Mac could materially
negatively affect our ability to compete with Freddie Mac for the acquisition of mortgage loans, our market share, and
the profitability and credit characteristics of the loans we acquire.
Pursuing our housing mission requirements may materially adversely affect our business, results of operations
and financial condition.
We are required by the GSE Act and FHFA regulation to support the housing market in ways that could materially
adversely affect our financial results and condition. For example, we are subject to housing goals that require a portion
of the mortgage loans we acquire to meet specified standards relating to affordability or location. We also have a duty to
serve very low-, low- and moderate-income families in three specified underserved markets: manufactured housing,
affordable housing preservation and rural housing.
We are taking actions to support the housing market that could materially adversely affect our profitability and our ability
to meet our targeted return requirements established by FHFA. For example, we are acquiring loans to meet our
housing mission requirements that generally offer lower expected returns than the returns earned on non-mission-
related loans, which negatively affects our ability to meet our targeted return requirements established by FHFA. In
addition, some of the loans we acquire to meet our housing mission requirements pose a higher credit risk than the
other loans we purchase, which could materially increase our provision for credit losses and our write-offs.
If we do not meet our housing goals or duty-to-serve requirements, and FHFA finds that the goals or requirements were
feasible, FHFA may require us to submit a housing plan describing the actions we will take to improve our performance.
The actions we take under the housing plan could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and
financial condition. The potential penalties for failure to comply with housing plan requirements relating to our housing
goals include a cease-and-desist order and civil money penalties. See “ Business - Legislation and Regulation ” for more
information on our housing goals and duty to serve underserved markets.
The conservatorship and agreements with Treasury adversely affect our common and preferred stockholders.
The material adverse effects on our stockholders of the conservatorship and under the current terms of our agreements
with Treasury include the following:
No voting rights during conservatorship. During conservatorship, our common stockholders do not have the ability to
elect directors or to vote on other matters unless the conservator delegates this authority to them.
No dividends to common or preferred stockholders, other than to Treasury. Our conservator announced in September
2008 that we would not pay any dividends on the common stock or on any series of preferred stock, other than the
senior preferred stock, while we are in conservatorship. In addition, under the terms of the senior preferred stock
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
Risk Factors | GSE and Conservatorship Risk
purchase agreement, dividends may not be paid to common or preferred stockholders (other than on the senior
preferred stock) without the prior written consent of Treasury, regardless of whether we are in conservatorship.
Our profits directly increase the liquidation preference of Treasury’s senior preferred stock and we will be required to
pay dividends on the senior preferred stock in the future. The senior preferred stock ranks senior to our common stock
and all other series of our preferred stock, as well as any capital stock we issue in the future, as to both dividends and
distributions upon liquidation. Accordingly, if we are liquidated, the senior preferred stock is entitled to its then-current
liquidation preference, before any distribution is made to the holders of our common stock or other preferred stock.
Under the current terms of the senior preferred stock, until the capital reserve end date, the liquidation preference of the
senior preferred stock increases each quarter by the amount of the increase in our net worth, if any, during the
immediately prior fiscal quarter. We expect the aggregate liquidation preference of the senior preferred stock will
continue to increase as we increase our net worth. In addition, the current terms of the senior preferred stock provide
that, following the capital reserve end date, we will be required to pay dividends on the senior preferred stock of the
lesser of (1) a 10% annual rate on the then-current liquidation preference of the senior preferred stock and (2) an
amount equal to the incremental increase in our net worth during the immediately prior fiscal quarter. The current terms
of the senior preferred stock also provide that dividends will resume when our net worth exceeds the amount of adjusted
total capital necessary for us to meet the capital requirements and buffers set forth in the enterprise regulatory capital
framework, which we expect will occur before the capital reserve end date because our net worth is calculated
differently than, and is higher than, our available capital under the enterprise regulatory capital framework. As of
December 31, 2024 , the amount of adjusted total capital necessary for us to meet the capital requirements and buffers
set forth in the enterprise regulatory capital framework was $190 billion , our net worth was $94.7 billion and we had an
available capital deficit of $37 billion . See “ Business - Conservatorship and Treasury Agreements - Treasury
Agreements -Senior Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement and Senior Preferred Stock” for more information on the
dividend provisions and aggregate liquidation preference of the senior preferred stock.
Exercise of the Treasury warrant would substantially dilute the investment of current stockholders. If Treasury exercises
its warrant to purchase shares of our common stock equal to 79.9% of the total number of shares of our common stock
outstanding on a fully diluted basis, the ownership interest in the company of our then-existing common stockholders
will be substantially diluted.
We are not managed for the benefit of stockholders. Because we are in conservatorship, we are not managed with a
strategy to maximize stockholder returns.
The senior preferred stock purchase agreement, senior preferred stock and warrant can only be waived or amended
with the consent of Treasury. For additional description of the conservatorship and our agreements with Treasury, see
“ Business - Conservatorship and Treasury Agreements .”
The liquidity and market value of our MBS could be materially adversely affected by developments in the
secondary mortgage market or the UMBS market, or by legislative, regulatory or industry developments, which
could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial results and financial conditio n.
The success of UMBS is largely predicated on the fungibility of UMBS issued by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. If
investors stop viewing Fannie Mae-issued UMBS and Freddie Mac-issued UMBS as fungible, or if investors prefer
Freddie Mac-issued UMBS over Fannie Mae-issued UMBS, it could adversely affect the liquidity and market value of
Fannie Mae MBS, the volume of our UMBS issuances and our guaranty fee revenues. Our competitiveness in
purchasing single-family loans from our lenders and the volume and profitability of our single-family business activity are
affected by the price performance of UMBS issued by us relative to comparable Freddie Mac-issued UMBS. If our
UMBS were to trade at a material discount relative to comparable Freddie Mac-issued UMBS, or at a minor discount for
a prolonged period of time, due to prepayment performance, credit profile or other factors, such a difference in relative
pricing may create an incentive for lenders to conduct more of their single-family business with Freddie Mac.
To support the fungibility of Fannie Mae-issued UMBS and Freddie Mac-issued UMBS, FHFA adopted a rule to align
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac programs, policies and practices that affect the prepayment rates of TBA-eligible
mortgage-backed securities. However, these alignment efforts may not be successful and the prepayment rates on
Fannie Mae-issued UMBS and Freddie Mac-issued UMBS could materially diverge in a manner that is disadvantageous
for us.
It is possible that a liquid market for our UMBS may not be sustained, which could materially adversely affect their price
performance and our single-family market share. A significant reduction in our market share, and thus in the volume of
loans that we securitize, or a reduction in the trading volume of our UMBS, could materially reduce the liquidity of our
UMBS. While we may decide to employ various strategies to support the liquidity and price performance of our UMBS,
any such strategies may fail or may result in our incurring costs that materially adversely affect our business and
financial results. We may cease any such activities at any time, or FHFA could require us to do so, which could
materially adversely affect the liquidity and price performance of our UMBS.
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
Risk Factors | GSE and Conservatorship Risk
In addition, we have experienced, and may continue to experience, price differences with Freddie Mac on individual new
production pools of TBA-eligible mortgages, particularly with respect to specified pools and our multi-lender securities.
From time to time, we may need to adjust our pricing for a particular new production pool category or introduce new
initiatives to maintain alignment and competitiveness with Freddie Mac with respect to the acquisition of such pools.
Depending on the amount of pricing adjustments in any period, it is possible that those adjustments could adversely
affect our guaranty fee revenues for that period.
The continued support of FHFA, Treasury, the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association, and certain other
regulatory bodies is critical to the success of UMBS. If any of these entities were to cease its support, the liquidity and
market value of Fannie Mae-issued UMBS could be adversely affected. Furthermore, if either we or Freddie Mac exits
conservatorship, it is unclear whether our and Freddie Mac’s programs, policies and practices in support of UMBS and
resecuritizations of each other’s securities would be sustained.
Our issuance of UMBS and structured securities backed by Freddie Mac-issued securities exposes us to
operational and counterparty credit risk.
When we resecuritize Freddie Mac-issued UMBS or other Freddie Mac securities, our guaranty of principal and interest
extends to the underlying Freddie Mac security. Although we have an indemnification agreement with Freddie Mac, in
the event Freddie Mac were to fail (for credit or operational reasons) to make a payment due on its securities underlying
a Fannie Mae-issued structured security, we would be obligated under our guaranty to fund any shortfall and make the
entire payment on the related Fannie Mae-issued structured security on that payment date. A failure by Freddie Mac to
meet these obligations could have a material adverse effect on our earnings and financial condition, and we could be
dependent on Freddie Mac and on the senior preferred stock purchase agreements that we and Freddie Mac each have
with Treasury to avoid a liquidity event or a default under our guaranty. Our current risk exposure to Freddie Mac-issued
securities is provided in “MD&A-Guaranty Book of Business.” In addition, the market value and liquidity profile of
single-family Fannie Mae MBS could be affected by financial and operational incidents relating to Freddie Mac, even if
those incidents do not directly relate to Fannie Mae or Fannie Mae MBS.
Our reliance on CSS and the common securitization platform exposes us to significant third-party risk.
We rely on CSS and its common securitization platform for the operation of a majority of our single-family securitization
activities. Although we jointly own CSS with Freddie Mac, there are limitations on our ability to control CSS.
The CSS Board of Managers currently has eight members-the CSS CEO, two members appointed by Fannie Mae,
two members appointed by Freddie Mac , and three members appointed by FHFA, which includes the Board Chair.
FHFA has the right to appoint one additional board member. If FHFA appoints an additional board member, the four CSS
Board members that we and Freddie Mac appoint could be outvoted by the other five Board members on any matter
during conservatorship and on a number of significant matters after conservatorshi p.
Board actions must be approved by a majority vote and the Board may not take any actions absent the Chair’s consent.
Once either Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac has exited conservatorship and is not in receivership, the Board Chair and any
board members appointed by FHFA may be removed by a unanimous vote of the Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac
members and the CSS CEO. Although the limited liability company agreement would require our approval for certain
“material decisions” if either we or Freddie Mac have exited conservatorship, the CSS Board may approve a number of
actions even after conservatorship over the objection of the board members we appoint, including: approval of the
annual budget and strategic plan for CSS (so long as it does not involve a material business change); withdrawal of
capital by a member; and requiring capital contributions necessary to support CSS’s ordinary business operations. It is
possible that FHFA may require us to make additional changes to the CSS limited liability company agreement, or may
otherwise impose restrictions or provisions relating to CSS or UMBS, that may adversely affect us.
We do not currently pay service fees to CSS under our customer services agreement; its operations are funded entirely
through capital contributions from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac pursuant to the limited liability company agreement.
During conservatorship, FHFA can direct us to enter into an amendment of the customer services agreement, or enter
such an amendment on our behalf, that could provide for a fee structure that would survive an exit from conservatorship
absent a further amendment to the customer services agreement, which a majority of the Board would have to approve.
Although implementation of any fee changes could require a further amendment to the customer services agreement,
we might not have significant leverage to negotiate that amendment and the associated fee changes given our
dependence on CSS.
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
Risk Factors | GSE and Conservatorship Risk
Our securitization activities are complex and present significant operational and technological challenges and risks. Any
measures we take to mitigate these challenges and risks might not be sufficient to prevent a disruption to our
securitization activities. Our business activities could be adversely affected and the market for single-family Fannie Mae
MBS could be disrupted if the common securitization platform were to fail or otherwise become unavailable to us or if
CSS were unable to perform its obligations to us. Any such failure or unavailability could have a significant adverse
impact on our business and could adversely affect the liquidity or market value of our single-family MBS. In addition, a
failure by CSS to maintain effective controls and procedures could result in material errors in our reported results or in
disclosures that are materially incomplete or materially inaccurate.
We are limited in our ability to diversify our business.
As a federally chartered corporation, we are subject to the limitations imposed by the Charter Act, extensive regulation,
supervision and examination by FHFA, and regulation by other federal agencies, including Treasury, HUD and the SEC.
The Charter Act defines our permissible business activities. For example, we may not originate mortgage loans or
purchase single-family loans in excess of the conforming loan limits, and our business is limited to the U.S. housing
finance sector. FHFA, as our regulator, may impose and has imposed additional limitations on our business. For
example, the GSE Act requires us to obtain prior approval from FHFA for new products and to provide advance notice to
FHFA of new activities. As described in “Business-Legislation and Regulation-Guaranty Fees and Pricing,” we are
also subject to a number of limitations on the guaranty fees we are permitted to charge, which is our primary source of
revenue. As a result of the limitations on our ability to diversify our operations, our financial condition and results of
operations depend almost entirely on conditions in a single sector of the U.S. economy, specifically, the U.S. housing
market. Weak or unstable conditions in the U.S. housing market can therefore have a significant adverse effect on our
business that we cannot mitigate through diversification. For a discussion of current U.S. housing market conditions,
see “ MD&A - Key Market Economic Indicators .”
An active trading market in our equity securities may cease to exist, which would adversely affect the market
price and liquidity of our common and preferred stock.
Our common stock and preferred stock are now traded exclusively in the over-the-counter market, and are not currently
listed on any securities exchanges. We cannot predict the actions of market makers, investors or other market
participants, and can offer no assurances that the market for our securities will be stable. If there is no active trading
market in our equity securities, the market price and liquidity of the securities will be adversely affected. In addition, the
market price of our common stock and preferred stock is subject to significant volatility, which may be due to other
factors described in these “Risk Factors,” as well as speculation regarding our future, economic and political conditions
generally, liquidity in the over-the-counter market in which our stock trades, and other factors, many of which are
beyond our control. Such factors could cause the market price of our common stock and preferred stock to decline
significantly from their current levels, which may result in significant losses to holders of our common stock and
preferred stock.
Credit Risk
We may incur significant future provisions for credit losses and write-offs on the loans in our book of business,
which could materially adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.
We are exposed to a significant amount of mortgage credit risk on our $4.1 trillion guaranty book of business. Borrowers
may fail to make required payments on mortgage loans we own or guaranty. This exposes us to the risk of credit losses.
We have experienced significant provisions for credit losses that have materially adversely affected our financial results
in certain prior periods, and this could occur again in a future period.
In general, significant home price or multifamily property value declines or increased loan delinquencies could materially
increase our provision for credit losses and our write-offs. Loan delinquencies, among other factors, are influenced by
income growth rates and unemployment levels, which affect borrowers’ ability to make their mortgage payments.
Changes in home prices or multifamily property values affect the amount of equity that borrowers have in their
properties. As home prices and multifamily property values increase, the severity of losses we incur on defaulted loans
that we hold or guarantee decreases because the amount we can recover from the properties securing the loans
increases. Conversely, declines in home prices and multifamily property values increase the losses we incur on
defaulted loans. If home prices or multifamily property values decline rapidly and a large number of borrowers default on
their loans, we could experience significant credit losses on our book of business, which could materially adversely
affect our results of operations and financial condition.
Given our expectation of slower economic and home price growth in 2025 and 2026, we expect the credit performance
of the loans in our guaranty book of business may decline compared to recent performance, which is reflected in our
allowance for credit losses as of December 31, 2024. If economic conditions are worse than we currently expect, or if
home price growth or multifamily property value growth are slower than we currently expect, we could experience
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
Risk Factors | Credit Risk
materially higher provisions for credit losses and write-offs. See “ MD&A - Key Market Economic Indicators ” for a
discussion of our expectations for economic growth and home prices.
We have loans in our single-family guaranty book of business that are typically associated with higher levels of credit
risk, such as loans with high LTV ratios, high debt-to-income (“DTI”) ratios and lower FICO credit scores. Similarly, we
have loans in our multifamily guaranty book of business that may present higher credit risk, such as high LTV ratios and
lower debt service coverage ratios (“DSCRs”). We present detailed information about the risk characteristics of our
single-family conventional guaranty book of business in “MD&A-Single-Family Business” and our multifamily guaranty
book of business in “MD&A-Multifamily Business.”
Changes in interest rates can also affect our credit losses, as we describe in a risk factor below in “Market and Industry
Risk.”
The credit enhancements we use provide only limited protection against potential future credit losses. These
transactions also increase our expenses.
While we use certain credit enhancements to mitigate some of our potential future credit losses, we may not be able to
obtain as much protection from our credit enhancements as we would like for a number of reasons, including:
• Some of the credit enhancements we use, such as mortgage insurance, Credit Insurance Risk Transfer TM
(“CIRT TM ”) transactions and DUS lender loss-sharing arrangements, are subject to the risk that the
counterparties may not meet their obligations to us, which we discuss in a risk factor below.
• Our Connecticut Avenue Securities ® (“CAS”) and CIRT credit risk transfer transactions have limited terms, after
which they provide limited or no further credit protection on the covered loans.
• Our credit risk transfer transactions are not designed to shield us from all losses because we retain a portion of
the risk of future losses on loans covered by these transactions, including all or a portion of the first loss
position in most transactions .
• In the event of a sufficiently severe economic downturn or other adverse market conditions, we may not be able
to enter into new back-end credit risk transfer transactions for our recent acquisitions on economically
advantageous terms.
• Mortgage insurance does not protect us from all losses on covered loans. For example, mortgage insurance
does not cover property damage that is not already covered by the hazard or flood insurance we require, and
such damage may result in a reduction to, or a denial of, mortgage insurance benefits.
In addition, the costs associated with credit risk transfer transactions are significant and may increase. For a discussion
of how we use credit risk transfer transactions to reduce our credit risk and manage our capital requirements, see
“MD&A-Single-Family Business-Single-Family Mortgage Credit Risk Management-Single-Family Credit
Enhancement and Transfer of Mortgage Credit Risk” and “MD&A-Multifamily Business-Multifamily Mortgage Credit
Risk Management - Multifamily Transfer of Mortgage Credit Risk.”
We may suffer material losses if borrowers suffer property damage as a result of hazards for which the
borrowers have no or insufficient insurance.
We require borrowers to obtain and maintain property insurance to cover the risk of damage to their homes or
properties resulting from hazards such as fire, wind and, for properties in a Federal Emergency Management Agency
(“FEMA”)-designated Special Flood Hazard Area, flooding. However, insurance would not cover property damage from
hazards for which we do not generally require insurance, such as earthquake damage or flood damage on a property
located outside a Special Flood Hazard Area. There may be instances in which borrowers’ claims under insurance
policies are not paid, borrowers’ insurance is insufficient to cover their losses, borrowers fail to use insurance proceeds
to make improvements to the property commensurate with the value of the damaged improvements, or borrowers fail to
maintain insurance and suffer property damage. Additionally, hazard insurers may experience significant financial strain
and be unable to make payments on related claims during a period in which significant numbers of mortgaged
properties are damaged by natural or other disasters. Since we generally permit borrowers to select and obtain required
hazard insurance policies, our requirements for hazard insurance coverage are verified by the lender or servicer, as
applicable. For single-family loans, we require a minimum financial strength rating for nongovernmental hazard insurers
that must be provided by S&P Global, Demotech, AM Best or KBRA, while for multifamily loans the rating must be
provided by Demotech or AM Best. We do not independently verify the financial condition of these hazard insurers and
rely on these rating agencies for their assessment of the financial condition of these insurers. To the extent that
borrowers suffer property damage as a result of a hazard that is uninsured or underinsured, or the hazard insurer does
not pay their claim, the borrowers may not pay their mortgage loans. If borrowers fail to make required payments on
mortgage loans we own or guarantee, we could experience significant provisions for credit losses and write-offs on the
loans in our book of business.
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
Risk Factors | Credit Risk
We estimate that, as of December 31, 2024 , only a small portion of loans in our guaranty book of business were located
in a Special Flood Hazard Area, for which we require flood insurance : 3.3% of loans in our single-family guaranty book
of business and 7.4% o f loans in our multifamily guaranty book of business . We believe that only a small portion of
borrowers in most places outside of these areas obtain flood insurance. The risk of significant flooding in places outside
of a Special Flood Hazard Area is expected to increase due to climate change. Furthermore, FEMA flood maps may not
accurately reflect the extent of flood risks in certain areas, and do not indicate how the risk will change in the future.
Single-family borrowers who obtain flood insurance generally rely on the National Flood Insurance Program (“NFIP”),
which was recently extended through March 14, 2025. If Congress fails to extend or re-authorize the program upon
future expirations, FEMA may not have sufficient funds to pay claims for flood damage, and borrowers may not be able
to renew their flood insurance coverage or obtain new policies through the NFIP. In addition, NFIP insurance does not
cover temporary living expenses, and the maximum limit of coverage available under NFIP for a single-family residential
property is $250,000, which may not be sufficient to cover all losses.
Increases in the intensity or frequency of floods or other weather-related disasters as a result of climate change are
expected to increase the foregoing risks. In some areas, some insurers have ceased writing new coverage or have
significantly increased insurance premiums for certain perils. As coverage becomes unavailable or prohibitively
expensive in an area, home prices or multifamily property values may experience considerable negative impacts, and
borrowers may face greater financial strain. For example, the recent California wildfires have resulted in widespread
property damage, which may lead to increased insurance costs, diminished housing affordability and economic
instability in that region. Ultimately, the desirability of areas that frequently experience hurricanes, wildfires, or other
natural disasters or face chronic climate-related physical risks, may diminish over time. This could adversely affect those
regions’ economies, home prices and multifamily property values, which may negatively impact our financial results. In
addition, investors may place greater weight on climate-related risks when making investment decisions, which could
increase our cost or ability to transfer credit risk.
The occurrence of major natural or other disasters in the United States or its territories could materially
increase our provision for credit losses and our write-offs.
We conduct our business in the single-family and multifamily residential mortgage markets and own or guarantee the
performance of mortgage loans throughout the United States and its territories. The occurrence of a major disruptive
event, such as a major natural or environmental disaster, terrorist attack, cyber attack, pandemic, or similar event , in the
United States or its territories could negatively impact our provision for credit losses and our write-offs on loans in the
affected geographic area or, depending on the magnitude, scope and nature of the event, nationally, in a number of
ways.
A major disruptive event that either damages or destroys single-family or multifamily real estate securing mortgage
loans in our book of business or negatively impacts the ability of borrowers to make principal and interest payments on
mortgage loans in our book of business could increase our delinquency rates, default rates and average loan loss
severity of our book of business in the affected region or regions. The amount of losses we incur following a major
disruptive event is affected by the availability of federal, state, or local assistance to borrowers affected by the event. If
such assistance is unavailable or severely limited following a major disruptive event, it could impact borrowers’ ability to
repay their mortgage loans and adversely affect our business and financial results. In January 2025, the Administration
issued an executive order establishing a council to provide recommendations for FEMA’s reform.
Further, a major disruptive event or a long-lasting increase in the vulnerability of an area to disasters that affects
borrowers’ ability to make payments on their mortgages, discourages housing activity, including homebuilding or home
buying, or causes a deterioration in housing conditions or the general economy in the affected region could lower the
volume of originations in the mortgage market, influence home prices and multifamily property values in the affected
region or in adjacent regions and increase delinquency rates and default rates. Any of these outcomes could generate
significant provisions for credit losses and write-offs.
Additionally, we do not differentiate our single-family guaranty fee pricing based on geographic area; therefore, we do
not charge higher upfront guaranty fees on single-family loans in geographic areas that may be more susceptible to
major disruptive or climate-related events. Charging differentiated single-family upfront guaranty fees on loans in certain
geographic areas would require the approval of FHFA as conservator.
Our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected by impacts
related to climate change.
Climate change presents both immediate and long-term risks to our business, financial condition and results of
operations. We face physical risks relating to event-driven (acute) disasters and longer-term (chronic) shifts in climate
patterns. We also face risks resulting from a potential transition to a lower-carbon economy.
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
Risk Factors | Credit Risk
Recent years have seen frequent and severe natural disasters in the U.S., including wildfires, hurricanes, tornadoes,
high winds, severe flooding, mudslides, and environmental contamination. We believe the frequency and intensity of
major weather-related events in recent years are indicative of the impacts of climate change, which we expect to persist
and worsen in the future. Population growth and an increase in people living in high-risk areas, such as coastal areas
vulnerable to severe storms and flooding, have also increased the impact of these events.
Although our financial exposure from these events is mitigated to the extent our book of business is geographically
diverse, we remain exposed to risk, particularly in connection with the risk of geographically widespread weather events
and changes in weather patterns, as well as geographic areas where our book of business is more heavily
concentrated. For a description of the geographic concentration of our single-family guaranty book of business, see
“ MD&A - Single-Family Business - Single-Family Mortgage Credit Risk Management - Single-Family Guaranty Book
Diversification and Monitoring ,” and for our multifamily guaranty book of business, see “ MD&A - Multifamily Business -
Multifamily Mortgage Credit Risk Management - Multifamily Guaranty Book Diversification and Monitoring .” As a result,
any continuation or increase in recent weather trends or their unpredictability, or any single natural disaster of significant
scope or intensity, could have a material impact on our results of operations and financial condition.
In addition to the impact of natural disasters, longer-term shifts in climate patterns could result in chronic risks such as
sustained higher temperatures, sea level rise, water scarcity and increased wildfires that negatively affect certain
regions, which could negatively affect home prices and multifamily property values in those regions, the availability ,
quality and affordability of insurance , as well as the ability of borrowers in those regions to pay their mortgage loans.
Efforts to address climate risks, such as transitioning to a lower-carbon economy, could also affect our business.
Regulatory actions, new building codes, carbon taxes, and energy efficiency requirements could increase housing and
compliance costs, impacting borrowers’ ability to pay their mortgage loans. Changes in borrower and renter
preferences, migration patterns, and property values driven by climate-related concerns could also increase our risk
exposure. A transition away from more carbon-intense industries could negatively impact certain industries and regional
economies, affecting the ability of borrowers in those industries or regions to pay their mortgage loans.
The timing and severity of climate-related events or societal changes in reaction to them are difficult to predict. Our
business and reputation may be harmed if our response to climate-related risks is perceived to be ineffective or
insufficient. While we are taking steps to integrate climate risk considerations into our Enterprise Risk Management
framework, our risk management strategies may not be effective in mitigating our climate risk exposure. As regulators
begin to mandate additional disclosure of climate-related information by companies, there may continue to be a lack of
information needed for robust climate-related risk analyses. Third-party exposures to climate-related risks and other
data generally are limited in availability and vary in quality. Modeling capabilities to analyze climate-related risks and
interconnections are improving but remain incomplete. We believe these limitations will affect our ability to identify and
manage climate-related risks. For a discussion on climate and natural disaster risk management, see “ MD&A -Risk
Management- Climate and Natural Disaster Risk Management .”
One or more of our institutional counterparties may fail to fulfill their contractual obligations to us, resulting in
financial losses, business disruption and decreased ability to manage risk.
We rely on our institutional counterparties to provide services and credit enhancements that are critical to our business.
We face the risk that one or more of our institutional counterparties may fail to fulfill their contractual obligations to us. If
an institutional counterparty defaults on its obligations to us, it could also negatively impact our ability to operate our
business, as we outsource some of our critical functions to third parties, such as mortgage servicing, single-family
Fannie Mae MBS issuance and administration, and certain technology functions.
Our primary exposures to institutional counterparties are with:
• credit guarantors that provide credit enhancements on the mortgage assets in our guaranty book of business,
including mortgage insurers, reinsurers, and multifamily lenders with risk-sharing arrangements;
• mortgage lenders that sell loans to us and mortgage lenders and other counterparties that service our loans;
and
• the financial institutions that issue the investments held in our corporate liquidity portfolio.
We also have direct counterparty exposure to: derivatives counterparties; custodial depository institutions; mortgage
originators, investors and dealers; debt security dealers; central counterparty clearing institutions; and document
custodians.
The concentration of our counterparties in similar or related businesses heightens our counterparty risk exposure. We
routinely enter into a high volume of transactions with counterparties in the financial services industry, including brokers
and dealers, mortgage lenders and commercial banks, and mortgage insurers, resulting in a significant credit
concentration with respect to this industry. We may also have multiple exposures to particular counterparties, as many
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
Risk Factors | Credit Risk
of our counterparties perform several types of services for us. For example, our lenders or their affiliates may also act
as derivatives counterparties, mortgage servicers, custodial depository institutions or document custodians. Accordingly,
if one of these counterparties were to become insolvent or otherwise default on its obligations to us, it could harm our
business and financial results in a variety of ways.
An institutional counterparty may default on its obligations to us for a number of reasons, such as changes in financial
condition that affect its credit rating, changes in its servicer rating, a reduction in liquidity, operational failures, a
cybersecurity incident, or insolvency. In the event of a bankruptcy or receivership of one of our counterparties, we may
be required to establish evidence of our ownership rights to the assets these counterparties hold on our behalf to the
satisfaction of the bankruptcy court or receiver, which could result in a delay in accessing these assets causing a
decline in their value. Counterparty defaults or limitations on their ability to do business with us could result in significant
financial losses or hamper our ability to do business or manage the risks to our business. In addition, if we are unable to
replace a defaulting counterparty that performs services critical to our business, it could adversely affect our ability to
conduct our operations and manage risk.
We have significant exposure to institutions in the financial services industry relating to derivatives, funding, short-term
lending, securities, and other transactions. We depend on our ability to enter into derivatives transactions with our
derivatives counterparties in order to manage the duration and prepayment risk of our retained mortgage portfolio. If we
lose access to our derivatives counterparties, it could adversely affect our ability to manage these risks.
We use clearinghouses to facilitate many of our derivative trades. If the clearinghouse or the clearing member we use to
access the clearinghouse defaults, we could lose margin that we have posted with the clearing member or
clearinghouse. We are also a clearing member of two divisions of Fixed Income Clearing Corporation (“FICC”), a central
counterparty (“CCP”). One FICC division clears our trades involving securities purchased under agreements to resell,
securities sold under agreements to repurchase, and other non-mortgage related securities. The other division clears
our forward purchase and sale commitments of mortgage-related securities, including dollar roll transactions. As a
clearing member of FICC, we are exposed to the risk of losses if the CCP or one or more of the CCP’s clearing
members fails to perform its obligations, because each FICC clearing member is required to absorb a portion of the
losses incurred by other clearing members if they fail to meet their obligations to the clearinghouse. We could also incur
losses associated with replacing transactions cleared through FICC in the event of a default by, or the financial or
operational failure of, FICC. For more information, see “MD&A-Risk Management-Institutional Counterparty Credit
Risk Management-Other Counterparties-Central Counterparty Clearing Institutions.”
We also have indirect counterparty exposure to many different types of entities that provide services and credit
enhancements to our direct counterparties, such as hazard insurers.
Our financial condition and results of operations may be materially adversely affected if mortgage servicers fail
to perform their obligations to us.
We delegate the servicing of the mortgage loans in our guaranty book of business to mortgage servicers; we do not
have our own servicing function. Functions performed by mortgage servicers on our behalf include collecting and
delivering principal and interest payments, administering escrow accounts, monitoring and reporting delinquencies,
performing default prevention and loss mitigation activities, and other functions. A servicer’s inability or other failure to
perform these functions or to follow our requirements could negatively impact our ability to, among other things:
• manage our book of business;
• collect amounts due to us;
• actively manage troubled loans; and
• implement our homeownership assistance, foreclosure prevention and other loss mitigation efforts.
A decline in a servicer’s performance, such as delayed or missed opportunities for loan workouts, foreclosure
alternatives or foreclosures, could significantly affect our ability to mitigate credit losses and could materially adversely
affect the overall credit performance of the loans in our guaranty book of business. Servicers may experience financial
and other difficulties due to the advances they are required to make on our behalf on delinquent mortgages, including
mortgages subject to forbearance plans. We could be materially adversely affected if our servicers lack appropriate
controls, experience a failure in their controls, or experience a disruption in their ability to service loans, including as a
result of legal or regulatory actions, ratings downgrades, liquidity constraints, operational failures or cybersecurity
incidents. We have experienced losses as a result of servicers’ failure to perform their obligations.
As of December 31, 2024 , over half of our single-family guaranty book and over half of our multifamily guaranty book
were serviced by non-depository servicers. T he generally lower financial strength and liquidity of non-depository
mortgage servicers compared with depository mortgage servicers may negatively affect their ability to fully satisfy their
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
Risk Factors | Credit Risk
financial obligations or to properly service the loans on our behalf. Non-depository servicers also are generally not
subject to the same level of regulatory oversight as our mortgage servicer counterparties that are depository institutions.
Replacing a mortgage servicer can result in potentially significant increases in our costs, as well as increased
operational risks. If a mortgage servicer fails, it could result in a temporary disruption in servicing and loss mitigation
activities relating to the loans serviced by that mortgage servicer, particularly if there is a loss of experienced servicing
personnel. We may also face challenges in transferring a large servicing portfolio. Although we have contingency plans
in the event of a failure of one or more of our top mortgage servicers, there can be no assurance that we will be able to
successfully execute against those plans in times of severe economic stress in the mortgage servicing industry.
The actions we have taken to mitigate our credit risk exposure to mortgage servicers may not be sufficient to prevent us
from experiencing significant financial losses or business interruptions in the event they cannot fulfill their obligations to
us.
We may incur losses as a result of claims under our mortgage insurance policies not being paid in full or at all.
We rely heavily on mortgage insurers to provide insurance against borrower defaults on single-family conventional
mortgage loans with LTV ratios over 80% at the time of acquisition. Although our primary mortgage insurer
counterparties currently approved to write new business must meet risk-based asset requirements, there is still a risk
that these counterparties may fail to fulfill their obligations to pay our claims under insurance policies. If a currently
approved mortgage insurer fails to meet its obligations to reimburse us for claims, our credit losses could increase. In
addition, if a regulator determines that a currently approved mortgage insurer lacks sufficient capital to pay all claims
when due, the regulator could take action that might affect the timing and amount of claim payments made to us by our
approved mortgage insurer counterparties. We face similar risks with respect to our credit insurance risk transfer
counterparties.
With respect to primary mortgage insurers that we have approved to write coverage on loans sold to us, we currently do
not differentiate pricing based on counterparty strength or operational performance. Additionally, we would not revoke a
primary mortgage insurer’s status as an eligible insurer unless there were a material violation of our private mortgage
insurer eligibility requirements. Further, we do not generally select the provider of primary mortgage insurance on a
specific loan, because the selection is usually made by the lender at the time the loan is originated. Accordingly, we
have limited ability to manage our concentration risk with respect to primary mortgage insurers.
On at least a quarterly basis, we assess our mortgage insurer counterparties’ respective abilities to fulfill their
obligations to us, and our loss reserves take into account this assessment. If our assessment indicates their ability to
pay claims has deteriorated significantly or if our projected claim amounts have increased, we could experience a
material increase in our provision for credit losses and write-offs.
We could experience additional financial losses due to mortgage fraud.
We use a process of delegated underwriting in which single-family and multifamily lenders make specific
representations and warranties about the characteristics of the mortgage loans we purchase and securitize. As a result,
while we have implemented certain quality control processes, we do not independently verify all borrower information
that is provided to us. This exposes us to an increased risk that one or more of the parties involved in a transaction
(such as the borrower, borrower’s attorney, sponsor, seller, broker, appraiser, property inspector, title agent, lender or
servicer) will engage in fraud by misrepresenting facts about a mortgage loan. Similarly, we rely on delegated servicing
of loans and use of a variety of external resources to assist in asset management functions, including managing our
REO inventory. For a discussion of how we mitigate this risk, see “MD&A-Single-Family Business” and “MD&A-
Multifamily Business.” We have experienced financial losses resulting from mortgage fraud , including institutional fraud
perpetrated by counterparties . In the future, we may experience additional financial losses as a result of mortgage fraud
that could be material to our financial results.
We have discovered instances of multifamily lending transactions in which one or more of the parties involved engaged
in mortgage fraud or possible mortgage fraud, and we continue to investigate additional multifamily lending transactions
in which we suspect fraud may have occurred and may discover additional multifamily loans we have purchased that
were affected by fraud. Certain gaps have been identified in our processes for managing multifamily loan origination
fraud risk and for overseeing our multifamily seller/servicer counterparties. See “MD&A-Multifamily Business-
Multifamily Mortgage Credit Risk Management-Multifamily Acquisition Policy and Underwriting Standards ” for a
discussion of actions we have taken and are taking to improve these processes. Until we implement our remaining
planned process improvements for managing multifamily loan origination fraud risk and oversight of multifamily seller/
servicer counterparties, we may face a higher risk that we will be unable to detect or prevent fraudulent multifamily
lending transactions, which could negatively affect our future financial results and condition.
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
Risk Factors | Operational and Model Risk
Operational and Model Risk
A failure in our operational systems or infrastructure, or those of third parties or the financial services industry,
could cause significant disruptions, materially adversely affect our business, liquidity, results of operations
and financial condition, and materially harm our reputation.
Shortcomings or failures in our internal processes, people, or systems, third parties, or external events, could
significantly disrupt our business or have a material adverse effect on our risk management, liquidity, financial statement
reliability, financial condition and results of operations. Such a failure could result in legislative or regulatory intervention
or sanctions, liability to counterparties, financial losses, business disruptions and damage to our reputation. For
example, our business is highly dependent on our ability to manage and process, on a daily basis, an extremely large
number of transactions, many of which are highly complex, across numerous and diverse markets that continuously and
rapidly change and evolve. These transactions are subject to various legal, accounting and regulatory standards. Our
financial, accounting, data processing or other operating systems and facilities may fail to operate properly or become
disabled or damaged as a result of a number of factors, including events that are wholly or partially beyond our control,
adversely affecting our ability to process these transactions or manage associated data with reliability and integrity. For
example, a third-party software update could negatively affect the functionality of our systems. In addition, we rely on
information provided by third parties in processing many of our transactions; that information may be incorrect or we
may fail to properly manage or analyze it or properly monitor its data quality.
We rely upon business processes that are highly dependent on people, technology, data and the use of numerous
complex systems and models to manage our business and produce information upon which our financial statements
and risk reporting are prepared. This reliance increases the risk that we may be exposed to financial, reputational or
other losses as a result of inadequately designed internal processes or data management architecture, inflexible
technology or the failure of our systems. In addition, our use of third-party service providers for some of our business
and technology functions increases the risk that an operational failure by a third party will adversely affect us. For
example, we use third-party service providers for cloud infrastructure services. We have experienced interruptions in
access to our platforms as a result of connectivity issues with third-party cloud-based platforms and related data centers
and could experience disruptions again if there is a lapse of service, interruption of internet service provider connectivity
or damage to third-party cloud-based platforms or any related data centers. The risk of these disruptions is exacerbated
by key fourth-party relationships, in which some of our third-party service providers have engaged subcontractors to
provide key services and our ability to assess the fourth party’s operational controls is limited.
While we continue to enhance our technology, infrastructure, operational controls and organizational structure in order
to reduce our operational risk, these actions may not be effective to manage these risks. Moreover, some of our
initiatives designed to reduce our operational risk over the long term, particularly those relating to the implementation of
new technology and the transition to third-party cloud-based platforms, increase our operational risk over the short term
as we implement the changes, as many involve significant changes to our business processes, controls, systems and
infrastructure. If we fail to implement these initiatives in a well-managed, secure and effective manner, we may
experience significant unplanned service disruptions or unforeseen costs, which could result in material harm to our
business and results of operations.
Our ability to manage and aggregate data may be limited by the effectiveness of our policies, programs, processes,
systems and practices that govern how data is acquired, validated, stored, protected, processed and shared. Failure to
manage data effectively and to aggregate data in an accurate and timely manner may limit our ability to manage current
and emerging risks, as well as to manage changing business needs. The increasing use of new third-party and open
source artificial intelligence tools poses additional risks relating to the protection of data, including the potential
exposure of our proprietary confidential information to unauthorized recipients and the misuse of our intellectual
property. Third-party service providers or other external parties, or our employees, may use artificial intelligence in ways
we have not authorized that may increase our risk of loss of our confidential data or intellectual property, or that create
operational or reputational risks for us.
We use artificial intelligence and machine learning technology to help manage some of the operational risks we face.
Our use of this technology presents risks, including the potential for outages, inefficiencies, data loss, and bias or errors
in the technology’s analysis and conclusions while the technology and our use of the technology matures. Additionally,
the use of artificial intelligence within products or services that we use or that are used by our third-party service
providers may pose similar risks.
We also face the risk of operational failure, termination or capacity constraints of any of the clearing agents, paying
agents, exchanges, clearinghouses or other financial intermediaries, including the Federal Reserve, we use to facilitate
our securities and derivatives transactions. Moreover, the consolidation and interconnectivity among clearing agents,
exchanges and clearing houses increases the risk of operational failure, on both an individual basis and an industry-
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
Risk Factors | Operational and Model Risk
wide basis. Any such failure, termination or constraint could adversely affect our ability to effect transactions or manage
our exposure to risk.
Most of our employees and business operations functions are consolidated in two metropolitan areas: Washington, DC
and Dallas, Texas. A major disruptive event at or affecting either location (such as severe weather, natural disaster,
utility failure, civil unrest, terrorist attack or active shooter) could significantly adversely impact our ability to conduct
normal business operations. Moreover, because of the concentration of our employees in the Washington, DC and
Dallas metropolitan areas, a regional disruption, particularly a disruption with a sustained impact, in one of these areas
could prevent our employees from accessing our facilities, working remotely, or communicating with or traveling to other
locations. Accordingly, the occurrence of one or more major disruptive events could materially adversely affect our ability
to conduct our business and lead to financial losses.
A cyber attack or other cybersecurity incident relating to our systems or those of third parties with which we do
business could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial results and financial condition.
Our operations rely on the secure processing, storage and transmission of confidential and other information (including
personal information) in our computer systems and networks, and those of third parties with which we do business.
Cybersecurity risks for large institutions like us have continued to increase, in part because of the proliferation of new
technologies and the use of the Internet, telecommunications and cloud technologies to conduct financial transactions,
and the increased sophistication and activities of organized crime, hackers, “hacktivists,” terrorists, and other external
parties, including nation-states and foreign state-sponsored threat actors. A number of financial services companies,
consumer-based companies, software and information technology service providers, and other organizations have
reported the unauthorized access or disclosure of client, customer or other confidential information (including personal
information), as well as cybersecurity incidents involving the dissemination, theft or destruction of corporate information
or other assets. There have also been many highly publicized cyber attacks where threat actors have requested
“ransom” payments in exchange for not disclosing stolen customer information or for restoring access to the company’s
systems. In addition, there have been cyber attacks against companies where threat actors have misled company
personnel into granting unauthorized access or making unauthorized transfers of funds to the actors’ accounts.
We have been, and expect to continue to be, the target of cyber attacks and other cybersecurity threats, such as
computer viruses, malware, ransomware, denial of service attacks, phishing and other social engineering attacks, and
data breaches. We also have experienced, and expect to continue to experience, incidents such as server malfunctions,
system outages, and software or hardware failures. We could also be materially adversely affected by cybersecurity
incidents that target the infrastructure of the Internet and critical service providers, as such incidents could cause
widespread unavailability of websites, applications and application programming interfaces (“APIs”), and degrade
website, application and API performance. Despite our efforts to protect the integrity of our systems and information, we
may not be able to anticipate, detect or recognize all cybersecurity threats, or to implement effective preventative
measures against all cybersecurity threats, especially because the techniques used in cyber attacks are increasingly
sophisticated, change frequently, and in some cases are not recognized until launched or even later. To date,
cybersecurity incidents have not had a material impact on our business strategy, business, financial results or financial
condition. However, we could suffer material financial or other losses, as well as material reputational damage, as a
result of cybersecurity incidents.
Our risk and exposure to cyber attacks and other cybersecurity incidents remain heightened because of, among other
things:
• the evolving nature and increasing frequency of these threats, including the emergence of powerful new
technologies to assist threat actors in cyber attacks, such as generative artificial intelligence, machine learning
and quantum computing;
• the persistence, sophistication and intensity of cybersecurity threats;
• our prominent size and scale and our role in the financial services industry;
• the outsourcing of some of our business operations;
• our and our third parties’ use of automation, artificial intelligence and robotics ;
• a shortage of qualified cybersecurity professionals in the industry;
• our migration to cloud-based systems;
• our use of employee-owned devices for business communication;
• the interconnectivity and interdependence of external parties to our systems; and
• the current global economic and political environment.
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
Risk Factors | Operational and Model Risk
We routinely identify cybersecurity threats as well as vulnerabilities in our systems and work to address or mitigate
those we have identified. Some cybersecurity vulnerabilities take a substantial amount of time to resolve or mitigate. We
continue to have cybersecurity vulnerabilities that we have identified but not resolved or mitigated. In addition, efforts to
resolve or mitigate some of our cybersecurity vulnerabilities may be unsuccessful and some cybersecurity vulnerabilities
may not be possible to resolve. We may also have cybersecurity vulnerabilities that we have not yet identified.
Cyber attacks can originate from a variety of sources, including external parties who are affiliated with foreign
governments or are involved with organized crime or terrorist organizations. Cybersecurity risks also derive from human
error, fraud or malice on the part of our employees or third parties. Threat actors have attempted, and we expect will
continue to attempt, to induce employees, lenders, servicers, vendors, service providers, counterparties or other users
of our systems to disclose sensitive information or provide access to our systems or network, or to our data or that of
our counterparties or borrowers, and these types of risks may be difficult to detect or prevent.
Cybersecurity incidents from time to time could result in the theft of important assets or the unauthorized disclosure,
gathering, monitoring, misuse, corruption, loss or destruction of confidential and other information (including personal
information) that belongs to us, our lenders, our servicers, our counterparties, third-party service providers or borrowers
that is processed and stored in, and transmitted through, our computer systems and networks. These incidents could
also result in damage to our systems or otherwise cause interruptions or malfunctions in our, our lenders’, our
counterparties’ or third parties’ operations, systems or networks, which could disrupt our day-to-day business activities
and negatively affect our ability to effect business transactions and manage our exposure to risk. We have experienced
cybersecurity incidents and some of these incidents have resulted in disruptions to our systems and/or those of our
lenders, counterparties and other third parties, as well as financial losses. While to date the impact of these incidents
has not been material to our business strategy, business, financial results or financial condition, cybersecurity incidents
could result in financial losses, loss of lenders, servicers and business opportunities, reputational damage, damage to
our competitive position, litigation, regulatory fines, penalties or intervention, reimbursement or other compensatory
costs or other harms that have a material adverse impact on our business strategy, business, financial results or
financial condition.
Cyber attacks or other cybersecurity incidents can persist for an extended period of time without detection. It may take
considerable time to complete an investigation of a cybersecurity incident and obtain full and reliable information. While
we are investigating a cybersecurity incident, we may not know the full impact of the incident or how to remediate it, and
actions and decisions that are taken or made may further increase the negative impact of the incident. In addition,
announcing that a cyber attack or cybersecurity incident has occurred may worsen the impact of the attack or incident,
and may increase the risk of additional cyber attacks. All or any of these challenges could further increase the costs and
consequences of a cybersecurity incident, as well as hinder our ability to obtain and provide rapid, complete and reliable
information about a cybersecurity incident. We may be required to expend significant additional resources to modify or
add to our protective measures and to investigate and remediate vulnerabilities or other exposures arising from
cybersecurity risks.
Although we maintain insurance coverage relating to cybersecurity risks, our insurance may not be sufficient to provide
adequate loss coverage (including if the insurer denies future claims) and may not continue to be available to us on
economically reasonable terms, or at all. Further, we cannot ensure that any indemnification or limitation of liability
provisions in our agreements with lenders, servicers, service providers, vendors, counterparties and other third parties
with which we do business would be enforceable or adequate or would otherwise protect us from liabilities or damages
with respect to a particular claim in connection with a cybersecurity incident.
Third parties with which we do business and our regulators are also sources of cybersecurity risk. Because we are
interconnected with and dependent on third-party vendors, lenders, servicers, exchanges, clearing houses, fiscal and
paying agents, and other financial intermediaries, including CSS, we could be materially adversely impacted if any of
them is subject to a successful cyber attack or other cybersecurity incident. Some of the third parties with which we do
business have experienced, and we expect will continue to experience, cybersecurity incidents. While third-party
cybersecurity incidents have not had a material impact on our business to date, the inability of a third party with which
we do business to meet its obligations to us as a result of a cybersecurity incident, our response to such an incident, or
other consequences of the incident could materially adversely affect our business.
We routinely transmit and receive personal, confidential and proprietary information by electronic means. We also share
this type of information with regulatory agencies and their vendors. We outsource certain functions and these
relationships allow for the external storage and processing of our information, as well as lender, servicer, counterparty
and borrower information, including on cloud-based systems. In addition, our lenders and servicers maintain personal,
confidential and proprietary information, including personal borrower information. While we engage in actions to mitigate
our exposure resulting from our information-sharing activities with lenders, servicers, regulatory agencies, vendors,
service providers, counterparties and other third parties to protect against cybersecurity incidents, we cannot ensure
that these third parties have appropriate controls in place to protect the confidentiality of the information. An interception,
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
Risk Factors | Operational and Model Risk
misuse or mishandling of personal, confidential or proprietary information being sent to, received from, or maintained by
a lender, servicer, regulatory agency, vendor, service provider, counterparty or other third party could result in legal
liability, fines, regulatory action and reputational harm that have a material adverse impact on our business, financial
results or financial condition.
Material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting could result in errors in our reported
results or disclosures that are not complete or accurate.
Management has determined that, as of the date of this filing, we have ineffective disclosure controls and procedures
that result in a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting. In addition, our independent registered
public accounting firm, Deloitte & Touche LLP, has expressed an adverse opinion on our internal control over financial
reporting because of the material weakness. Our ineffective disclosure controls and procedures and material weakness
could result in errors in our reported results or disclosures that are not complete or accurate, which could have a
material adverse effect on our business and operations.
Our material weakness relates specifically to the impact of the conservatorship on our disclosure controls and
procedures. Because we are under the control of FHFA, some of the information that we may need to meet our
disclosure obligations may be solely within the knowledge of FHFA. As our conservator, FHFA has the power to take
actions without our knowledge that could be material to our stockholders and other stakeholders, and could significantly
affect our financial performance or our continued existence as an ongoing business. Because FHFA currently functions
as both our regulator and our conservator, there are inherent structural limitations on our ability to design, implement,
operate and test effective disclosure controls and procedures relating to information known to FHFA. As a result, we
have not been able to update our disclosure controls and procedures in a manner that adequately ensures the
accumulation and communication to management of information known to FHFA that is needed to meet our disclosure
obligations under the federal securities laws, including disclosures affecting our financial statements. Given the
structural nature of this material weakness, we do not expect to remediate this weakness while we are under
conservatorship. See “Controls and Procedures” for further discussion of management’s conclusions on our disclosure
controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting.
Failure of our models to produce reliable outputs may materially adversely affect our ability to manage risk and
make effective business decisions, as well as create regulatory and reputational risk.
We make significant use of quantitative models to measure and monitor our risk exposures and to manage our
business. For example, we use models to measure and monitor our exposures to interest rate, credit and market risks,
and to forecast credit losses. We use this information in making business decisions relating to strategies, initiatives,
transactions, pricing and products.
Models are inherently imperfect predictors of actual results because they are based on historical data and assumptions
regarding factors such as future loan demand, borrower behavior, creditworthiness and home price trends. Other
potential sources of inaccurate or inappropriate model results include errors in computer code, inaccurate or incomplete
data, misuse of data, or use of a model for a purpose outside the scope of the model’s design. Modeling often assumes
that historical data or experience can be relied upon as a basis for forecasting future events, an assumption that may be
especially tenuous in the face of unprecedented events, such as the COVID-19 pandemic and long-term climate
change.
Given the challenges of predicting future behavior, management judgment is used throughout the modeling process,
from model design decisions regarding core underlying assumptions, to interpreting and applying final model output.
When market conditions change quickly and in unforeseen ways, there is an increased risk that the model assumptions
and data inputs for our models are not representative of the most recent market conditions, which requires management
to apply its judgment to make adjustments or overrides to our models. In a rapidly changing environment, it may not be
possible to update existing models quickly enough to properly account for the most recently available data and events.
In addition, in periods of low transaction volume for certain types of assets, the limited data available may reduce the
reliability of model outputs.
We also use third-party models that expose us to additional risks beyond those for internally-developed models. We
often have limited visibility into the third-party’s model methodology and change management process. In addition, in
some instances we rely on third-party data providers to develop and provide estimates for our models. This reliance on
third-party data providers exposes us to risk should the data provider cease to provide the data going forward, change
its methodology or fail to meet our data quality standards, which could require that we find a suitable replacement for
the data and could result in the need to re-estimate our models with the new data.
We currently use artificial intelligence and machine learning techniques in our models, and expect to increase our use of
these modeling techniques. The use of new artificial intelligence and machine learning technology in our models
presents risks, such as the risk of undetected bias in the model and the limited ability to understand and challenge the
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
Risk Factors | Operational and Model Risk
model due to a limited ability to observe the internal workings of many machine learning models. Further, we use
artificial intelligence models developed by third parties, and, to that extent, are dependent in part on the manner in
which those third parties develop and train their models, including risks arising from the inclusion of any unauthorized
material in the training data for their models, and the effectiveness of the steps these third parties have taken to limit the
risks associated with the output of their models, matters over which we may have limited visibility.
To the extent our internal models or the third-party models that we use fail to produce reliable outputs on an ongoing
basis, we may not make appropriate business and risk management decisions, including decisions affecting loan
purchases, guaranty fee pricing, management of credit losses, and asset and liability management. While we employ
strategies to manage and govern the risks associated with our use of models, they have not always been fully effective.
Errors were previously discovered in some of the models we use, and we continue to have deficiencies in our current
processes for managing model risk. And we have experienced instances where model failures have adversely affected
our business and risk management decisions. As noted in “MD&A- Risk Management - Model Risk Management ,” we
are currently working on a number of remediation activities relating to our models, including improving our processes for
model governance, development, implementation and testing. Until these remediation activities are completed, we face
a higher risk that we may make inappropriate business or risk management decisions based on unreliable model
outputs that could materially negatively affect our financial results and condition.
Errors in our models can also result in errors in our external disclosures. We discovered errors in a model used to
prepare our annual stress test results that affected our previously-reported stress test results for 2022 and some prior
years. While we have resolved those errors, we could discover additional errors in our models in the future that result in
further errors in our external disclosures that create regulatory and reputational risk.
Also see the risk factor below in “General Risk” for a discussion of the risks associated with the use of models in our
accounting methods.
Liquidity Risk
Limitations on our ability to access the debt capital markets could have a material adverse effect on our ability
to fund our operations, and our liquidity contingency plans may be difficult or impossible to execute during a
sustained liquidity crisis.
Our ability to fund our business depends in part on our ongoing access to the debt capital markets. Market concerns
about matters such as the extent of government support for our business and debt securities, the future of our business
(including future profitability, future structure, regulatory actions and our status as a government-sponsored enterprise)
and the creditworthiness of the U.S. government could cause a severe negative effect on our access to the unsecured
debt markets, particularly for long-term debt. We believe that our ability in recent years to issue debt of varying
maturities at attractive pricing resulted from federal government support of our business. As a result, we believe that our
status as a government-sponsored enterprise and continued federal government support are essential to maintaining
our access to debt funding. Changes or perceived changes in federal government support of our business, our debt
securities or our status as a government-sponsored enterprise could materially and adversely affect our ability to fund
our business. There can be no assurance that the government will continue to support our business or our debt
securities, or that our current level of access to debt funding will continue. If our senior preferred stock purchase
agreement with Treasury is amended to reduce its support for our debt securities issued after such amendment, it could
materially increase our borrowing costs or materially adversely affect our access to the debt capital markets.
Our debt is currently considered a high quality liquid asset because it can be easily and immediately converted into cash
at little or no loss of value. Any changes by investors in how they view our debt or regulatory changes causing our debt
to no longer be considered a high quality liquid asset could significantly increase our debt funding costs or reduce our
ability to issue debt.
The Federal Reserve Banks provide us with fiscal agency and depository services, and we make extensive use of the
Federal Reserve Banks’ payment systems in our daily business activities. We are required to fully fund our payment
accounts at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York to the extent necessary to cover principal and interest payments on
our debt and mortgage-related securities each day. The Federal Reserve Bank of New York, acting as our fiscal agent,
will initiate payments to depository institutions, which will credit the accounts of the holders of our securities. Although
we maintain access to various sources of intraday liquidity, such access is not guaranteed. If we have insufficient
resources to fully fund our Federal Reserve payment accounts on a given day, there could be delays in the payments on
our securities. Unlike depository financial institutions, we do not currently have access to the Federal Reserve’s
discount window, nor are we allowed to overdraw our Federal Reserve accounts during the business day .
Future changes or disruptions in the financial markets could significantly change the amount, mix and cost of funds we
obtain, as well as our liquidity position. If we are unable to issue a sufficient amount of short- and long-term debt
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
Risk Factors | Liquidity Risk
securities at attractive rates, it could interfere with the operation of our business and have a material adverse effect on
our liquidity, results of operations, financial condition and net worth.
Our liquidity contingency plans may be difficult or impossible to execute during a sustained market liquidity crisis. If the
financial markets experience substantial volatility in the future similar to or more intensely than in 2020, it could
significantly adversely affect the amount, mix and cost of funds we obtain, as well as our liquidity position. If we cannot
access the unsecured debt markets, our ability to repay maturing indebtedness and fund our operations could be
significantly impaired. In this event, our alternative source of liquidity, our corporate liquidity portfolio, may not be
sufficient to meet our liquidity needs.
A decrease in the credit ratings on our senior unsecured debt could increase our borrowing costs and have an
adverse effect on our ability to issue debt on reasonable terms, particularly if such a decrease were not based
on a similar action on the credit ratings of the U.S. government. A decrease in our credit ratings also could
require that we post additional collateral for our derivatives contracts.
A reduction in our credit ratings could materially adversely affect our liquidity, our ability to conduct our normal business
operations, our financial condition and our results of operations. Credit ratings on our senior unsecured debt, as well as
the credit ratings of the U.S. government, are primary factors that could affect our borrowing costs and our access to the
debt capital markets. Credit ratings on our debt are subject to revision or withdrawal at any time by the rating agencies.
Actions by governmental entities impacting the support our business or our debt securities receive from Treasury could
adversely affect the credit ratings on our senior unsecured debt. If our senior preferred stock purchase agreement with
Treasury is amended to reduce its support for our debt securities issued after such amendment, it could result in a
downgrade in the credit ratings on our senior unsecured debt.
Because we rely on the U.S. government for capital support, in recent years, when a rating agency has taken an action
relating to the U.S. government’s credit rating, they have taken a similar action relating to our ratings at approximately
the same time. S&P Global Ratings (“S&P”), Moody’s Investors Service (“Moody’s”) and Fitch Ratings (“Fitch”) have all
indicated that they would likely lower their ratings on the debt of Fannie Mae and certain other government-related
entities if they were to lower their ratings on the U.S. government.
A reduction in our credit ratings also could cause certain derivatives counterparties to demand that we post additional
collateral for our derivative contracts or to terminate our contracts. Our credit ratings, ratings outlook and additional
collateral requirements are described in “MD&A-Liquidity and Capital Management-Liquidity Management-Credit
Ratings” and “Note 9, Derivative Instruments.”
Market and Industry Risk
Changes in interest rates or limitations on our ability to manage interest-rate risk successfully could materially
adversely affect our financial results and condition, and increase our interest-rate risk.
We are subject to interest-rate risk, which is the risk that movements in interest rates will adversely affect the value of
our assets or liabilities or our future earnings or capital. Our exposure to interest-rate risk primarily arises from two
sources: (1) our “net portfolio,” which we define as: our retained mortgage portfolio assets, our corporate liquidity
portfolio, outstanding debt of Fannie Mae used to fund the retained mortgage portfolio assets and corporate liquidity
portfolio, mortgage commitments and risk management derivatives; and (2) our consolidated MBS trusts. We describe
these risks in more detail in “MD&A- Risk Management - Market Risk Management, including Interest-Rate Risk
Management .” Changes in interest rates affect both the value of our mortgage and other assets and prepayment rates
on our mortgage loans, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial results and condition, as well as our
liquidity.
Our ability to manage interest-rate risk depends on our ability to issue debt instruments with a range of maturities and
other features, including call provisions, at attractive rates and to engage in derivatives transactions. We must exercise
judgment in selecting the amount, type and mix of debt and derivative instruments that will most effectively manage our
interest-rate risk. The amount, type and mix of financial instruments that are available to us may not offset possible
future changes in the spread between our borrowing costs and the interest we earn on our mortgage assets. We mark
to market changes in the estimated fair value of our derivatives through our earnings on a quarterly basis, but we do not
similarly mark to market changes in some of the financial instruments that generate our interest-rate risk exposures. As
a result, changes in interest rates, particularly significant changes, can have an adverse effect on our earnings and net
worth, depending on the nature of the changes and the derivatives and short-term investments we hold at that time.
Although we have a hedge accounting program that is designed to reduce the volatility of our financial results
associated with changes in benchmark interest rates, our hedge accounting program does not eliminate all potential
earnings volatility associated with changes in interest rates. Decreasing interest rates would likely reduce the amounts
that we earn on our corporate liquidity portfolio, as we tend to earn lower yields on this portfolio in a declining interest
rate environment.
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
Risk Factors | Market and Industry Risk
We have experienced significant fair value losses in some periods due to changes in interest rates. Our hedge
accounting program is specifically designed to address the volatility of our financial results associated with changes in
fair value related to changes in the benchmark interest rates. As such, earnings variability driven by other factors, such
as spreads or the timing of when we recognize deferred guaranty fee income, remains. We describe how the timing of
when we recognize deferred guaranty fee income is sensitive to mortgage interest rates in “ MD&A - Key Market
Economic Indicators ” and “ MD&A - Consolidated Results of Operations - Net Interest Income .” In addition, our ability to
effectively reduce earnings volatility is dependent on having the right mix and volume of interest-rate swaps available.
As our portfolio of interest-rate swaps varies over time, our ability to reduce earnings volatility through hedge accounting
may vary as well.
Changes in interest rates also can affect our loss reserves and provision for credit losses. When interest rates increase,
our credit losses from loans with adjustable payment terms may increase as borrower payments increase at their reset
dates, which increases the borrower’s risk of default. Rising interest rates may also reduce the opportunity for these
borrowers to refinance into a fixed-rate loan. Similarly, many borrowers may have additional debt obligations, such as
home equity lines of credit and second liens, that also have adjustable payment terms. If a borrower’s payment on his or
her other debt obligations increases due to rising interest rates or a change in amortization, it increases the risk that the
borrower may default on a loan we own or guarantee. Rising interest rates also typically reduce expected future loan
prepayments, which tends to lengthen the expected life of our loans and therefore generally increases the probability of
default on the loans and therefore our loss reserves.
Increases in interest rates may also reduce the ability of multifamily borrowers to refinance their loans, which often have
balloon balances at maturity. In addition, in a rising interest rate environment, multifamily borrowers with adjustable-rate
mortgages may have difficulty paying higher monthly payments if property operating income is not increasing at a
similar pace. While we generally require multifamily borrowers with adjustable-rate mortgages to purchase an interest
rate cap to protect against large movements in interest rates, purchasing or replacing these required interest rate caps,
especially those with longer terms and/or lower strike rates, becomes more expensive as interest rates rise.
Changes in interest rates also typically affect our business volume. A higher interest rate environment generally results
in lower business volumes, as fewer loans may benefit from refinancing and the higher cost of borrowing reduces
affordability, driving lower mortgage volumes. A reduction in our business volume can reduce our net interest income
and adversely affect our financial results. Interest rate increases also can negatively affect the demand for and liquidity
of our MBS or result in slowdowns in home price growth, home price declines or declines in multifamily property values,
which also could adversely affect our results of operations, net worth and financial condition.
Changes in spreads could materially impact the fair value of our net assets, and therefore our results of
operations and net worth.
Spread risk is the risk from changes in an instrument’s value that relate to factors other than changes in interest rates.
We can experience losses from changes in the spreads between our mortgage assets, including mortgage purchase
and sale commitments, and the debt and derivatives we use to hedge our position. Changes in market conditions,
including changes in interest rates, liquidity, prepayment and default expectations, and the level of uncertainty in the
market for a particular asset class may cause fluctuations in spreads. Changes in mortgage spreads have contributed to
significant volatility in our financial results in certain periods, due to fluctuations in the estimated fair value of the
financial instruments that we mark to market through our earnings, and this could occur again in a future period.
Changes in mortgage spreads could cause significant fair value losses, and could adversely affect our near-term
financial results and net worth. We do not actively manage or hedge our spread risk after we purchase mortgage
assets, other than through asset monitoring and disposition.
Our business and financial results are affected by general economic conditions, including home prices and
employment trends, and changes in economic conditions or financial markets may materially adversely affect
our business and financial condition. Volatility or uncertainty in global, regional or domestic political
conditions also can significantly affect economic conditions and financial markets.
In general, a prolonged period of slow growth in the U.S. economy or a deterioration or volatility in general economic
conditions or financial markets could materially adversely affect our results of operations, net worth and financial
condition. Our business is significantly affected by the status of the U.S. economy, including home prices and
employment trends, as well as economic growth rates, interest rates and inflation rates. For example, see a risk factor
above in “Credit Risk” for a discussion of how worsening economic conditions could negatively affect the credit
performance of loans in our guaranty book of business and result in materially higher provisions for credit losses and
write-offs. Deterioration in economic conditions also typically results in reduced housing market activity, which reduces
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
Risk Factors | Market and Industry Risk
our business volume. As noted in a risk factor above, a reduction in our business volume can reduce our net interest
income and adversely affect our financial results.
Global economic conditions can also adversely affect our business and financial results. Changes or volatility in market
conditions resulting from deterioration in or uncertainty regarding global economic conditions can adversely affect the
value of our assets, which could materially adversely affect our results of operations, net worth and financial condition.
To the extent global economic conditions negatively affect the U.S. economy, they also could negatively affect the credit
performance of the loans in our book of business.
Volatility or uncertainty in global, regional or domestic political conditions also can significantly affect economic
conditions and financial markets. For example, changes t he Administration may implement relating to trade, fiscal or
immigration policies are uncertain and could affect the U.S. economy. Global, regional or domestic political unrest also
could affect growth and financial markets. For example, the Russian war in Ukraine may further impact the global
economy and financial markets, which could further increase inflationary pressure and interest rates, as well as
negatively affect economic growth and result in disruptions and volatility in the financial markets.
We describe above the risks to our business posed by changes in interest rates and changes in spreads. In addition,
future changes, disruptions or volatility in financial markets as a result of global, regional or domestic economic or
political conditions could significantly change the amount, mix and cost of funds we obtain, as well as our liquidity
position.
Legal and Regulatory Risk
Regulatory changes in the financial services industry and shifts in monetary policy may negatively impact our
business.
Changes in the regulation of the financial services industry are affecting and are expected to continue to affect many
aspects of our business. Such changes could affect our business directly or indirectly if they affect our lenders and other
counterparties. The Administration or Congress may implement changes in the regulation of the financial services
industry or in fiscal or monetary policy that substantially affect our business and financial results, including investor
demand for our debt securities, MBS and credit risk transfer transactions, the amount and credit quality of the loans we
acquire, and the servicing of our loans . For example, changes in regulations applicable to U.S. banks could affect the
volume and characteristics of mortgage loans available in the market and could also affect demand for our MBS and
debt securities, as U.S. banks purchase a large amount of our MBS and debt securities. New or revised liquidity or
capital requirements applicable to U.S. banks could materially affect banks’ willingness to deliver loans to us and to
service our loans, as well as demand by those banks for our MBS and debt securities. In addition, developments in
connection with the single-counterparty credit limit regulations, including those taken in anticipation of our eventual exit
from conservatorship, could also cause our lenders and investors to change their business practices.
Our business is significantly affected by shifts in fiscal and monetary policies, particularly actions taken by the Federal
Reserve. The actions of the Federal Reserve, Treasury, the OCC, the FDIC, the SEC, the CFTC, the CFPB, and
international central banking authorities directly or indirectly impact financial institutions’ cost of funds for lending,
capital-raising and investment activities, which could increase our borrowing costs or make borrowing more difficult for
us. Changes in monetary policy are beyond our control and can be difficult to anticipate. The Federal Reserve currently
holds a significant amount of mortgage-backed securities issued by us, Freddie Mac and Ginnie Mae. At the time of this
filing, the Federal Reserve has not announced any plans to begin selling the mortgage-backed securities in its portfolio.
If the Federal Reserve announces such a plan or changes its announced strategy to reduce its mortgage-backed
securities holdings, it could reduce the current level of demand for our MBS, which could adversely affect our results of
operations, net worth and financial condition.
Legislative and regulatory changes could affect us in substantial and unforeseeable ways and could have a material
adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition, liquidity and net worth.
Legislative, regulatory or judicial actions, and changes in interpretations of laws, regulations or accounting
standards, could negatively impact our business, results of operations, financial condition, liquidity or net
worth.
Legislative, regulatory or judicial actions at the federal, state or local level could negatively impact our business, results
of operations, financial condition, liquidity or net worth. Legislative, regulatory or judicial actions could affect us in a
number of ways, including by imposing significant additional costs on us, diverting management attention or other
resources from other matters, or increasing our operational risk. We could also be affected by:
• Further actions taken by the U.S. Congress, Treasury, the Federal Reserve, FHFA or other national, state or
local government agencies or legislatures in response to emergencies, such as expanding or extending our
obligations to help borrowers, renters or counterparties.
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
Risk Factors | Legal and Regulatory Risk
• Designation as a systemically important financial institution by FSOC. We have not been designated as a
systemically important financial institution; however, FSOC announced in 2020 that it will continue to monitor
the secondary mortgage market activities of the government-sponsored enterprises to ensure potential risks to
financial stability are adequately addressed. Designation as a systemically important financial institution would
result in our becoming subject to additional regulation and oversight by the Federal Reserve Board.
• Other agencies of the U.S. government or Congress asking us to take actions to support the housing and
mortgage markets or in support of other goals. For example, in December 2011, Congress enacted the TCCA
under which we increased our guaranty fee on all single-family mortgages delivered to us by 10 basis points.
The revenue generated by this fee increase is paid to Treasury. In November 2021, the Infrastructure
Investment and Jobs Act was enacted, which extended to October 1, 2032 our obligation under the TCCA to
collect 10 basis points in guaranty fees on single-family mortgages delivered to us and pay the associated
revenue to Treasury.
The laws, regulations and accounting standards that apply to our business are often complex and, in many cases, we
must make interpretive decisions regarding the application of those laws, regulations and accounting standards to our
business activities. Changes in interpretations, whether in response to regulatory guidance, industry conventions, our
own reassessments or otherwise, could adversely affect our business, results of operations or ability to satisfy
applicable regulatory requirements.
We face risk of non-compliance with our legal and regulatory obligations, which could have a material adverse
impact on our business, financial results and financial condition.
We operate in a highly regulated industry and are subject to heightened supervision from FHFA, as both our regulator
and our conservator. Our compliance systems and programs may not be adequate to confirm that we are in compliance
with all legal, regulatory, and other requirements as they continue to evolve. We also rely upon third parties and their
respective compliance risk management programs. The failure or limits of any such third-party compliance programs
may expose us to legal and compliance risk. Our reliance on and interdependence with third parties is further illustrated
by the number and complexity of our contracts. These contracts expose us to the risk that we could fail to perform our
obligations in a satisfactory manner and that a contractual counterparty could commence legal proceedings against us
for deficiencies related to our performance. If we fail to comply with our legal and regulatory obligations, it could result in
enforcement actions, investigations, fines, monetary and other penalties, additional restrictions on our business
activities imposed by FHFA, and harm to our reputation that may adversely affect our results of operations and financial
condition.
Privacy and cybersecurity are currently areas of considerable legislative and regulatory attention, with new or modified
laws, regulations, rules and standards being frequently adopted and potentially subject to divergent interpretation or
application in different jurisdictions in a manner that may create inconsistent or conflicting requirements for businesses.
The uncertainty created by these legislative and regulatory developments is compounded by the rapid pace of
technology development, including in artificial intelligence, that affect the use or security of data, including personal
information. Our business manages and holds a large volume of data, including a large volume of personal information.
Privacy and cybersecurity laws and regulations often impose strict requirements on the collection, storage, handling,
use, disclosure, transfer, security, and other processing of personal information. These laws and regulations, combined
with our evolving data footprint, are expected to increase our compliance costs and require changes to our business
and operations. An actual or perceived failure to comply with these laws and regulations or contractual obligations by
us, or by or our lenders, servicers, vendors, service providers, counterparties and our other third parties, could result in
legal liabilities, fines, regulatory action and reputational harm that have a material adverse impact on our business,
financial results and financial condition.
Our business and financial results could be materially adversely affected by legal or regulatory proceedings.
We are a party to various claims and other legal proceedings. We are periodically involved in government
investigations. We may be required to establish accruals and to make substantial payments in the event of adverse
judgments or settlements of any such claims, investigations or proceedings, which could have a material adverse effect
on our business, results of operations, financial condition, liquidity and net worth. For example, due to a judgment
against us in two cases consolidated for trial in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, which are described
in “ Note 17, Commitments and Contingencies ” and “Legal Proceedings,” we accrued a total of $519 million in 2023 and
2024 relating to the jury verdict and related awards of prejudgment and post-judgment interest . Any legal proceeding or
governmental investigation, even if resolved in our favor, could result in negative publicity, reputational harm or cause us
to incur significant legal and other expenses. In addition, responding to these matters could divert significant internal
resources away from managing our business.
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
Risk Factors | General Risk
General Risk
In many cases, our accounting policies and methods, which are fundamental to how we report our financial
condition and results of operations, require management to make judgments and estimates about matters that
are inherently uncertain. Management also relies on models in making these estimates.
Our management must exercise judgment in applying many of our accounting policies and methods so that they comply
with GAAP and reflect management’s judgment of the most appropriate manner to report our financial condition and
results of operations. In some cases, management must select the appropriate accounting policy or method from two or
more acceptable alternatives, any of which might be reasonable under the circumstances but might affect the amounts
of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses that we report. See “Note 1, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies”
for a description of our significant accounting policies.
We have identified one of our accounting estimates, allowance for loan losses, as critical to the presentation of our
financial condition and results of operations, as described in “MD&A- Critical Accounting Estimates .” We believe this
estimate is critical because it involves significant judgments and assumptions about highly complex and inherently
uncertain matters, and the use of reasonably different judgments and assumptions could have a material impact on our
reported results of operations or financial condition.
Because our financial statements involve estimates for amounts that are very large, even a small change in the estimate
can have a significant impact for the reporting period. For example, because our allowance for loan losses is so large,
even a change that has a small impact relative to the size of this allowance can have a meaningful impact on our results
for the quarter in which we make the change.
Many of our accounting methods involve substantial use of models, which are inherently imperfect predictors of actual
results because they are based on assumptions, including about future events. For example, we use models to
determine expected lifetime losses on loans and certain other financial instruments. Our actual results could differ
significantly from those generated by our models. As a result, the estimates that we use to prepare our financial
statements, as well as our estimates of our future results of operations, may be inaccurate, perhaps significantly. For
more discussion of the risks associated with our use of models, see a risk factor in “Operational and Model Risk” above.

---

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
None.

---

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
Item 2. Properties
There are no physical properties that are material to us.

---

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
This item describes our material legal proceedings. We describe additional material legal proceedings in “ Note 17,
Commitments and Contingencies ,” which is incorporated herein by reference. In addition to the matters specifically
described or incorporated by reference in this item, we are involved in legal and regulatory proceedings that arise in the
ordinary course of business that we do not expect will have a material impact on our business or financial condition.
However, litigation claims and proceedings of all types are subject to many factors and their outcome and effect on our
business and financial condition generally cannot be predicted accurately.
We establish an accrual for legal claims only when a loss is probable and we can reasonably estimate the amount of
such loss. The actual costs of resolving legal claims may be substantially higher or lower than the amounts accrued for
those claims. If certain of these matters are determined against us, FHFA or Treasury, it could have a material adverse
effect on our results of operations, liquidity and financial condition, including our net worth.
Senior Preferred Stock Purchase Agreements Litigation
Since June 2013, preferred and common stockholders of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac filed lawsuits in multiple federal
courts against one or more of the United States, Treasury and FHFA, challenging actions taken by the defendants
relating to the Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac senior preferred stock purchase agreements and the conservatorships of
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Some of these lawsuits also contain claims against Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. The
legal claims being advanced by one or more of these lawsuits include challenges to the net worth sweep dividend
provisions of the senior preferred stock that were implemented pursuant to August 2012 amendments to the
agreements, the payment of dividends to Treasury under the net worth sweep dividend provisions, and FHFA’s decision
to require Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to draw funds from Treasury to pay dividends to Treasury prior to the August
2012 amendments. The plaintiffs seek various forms of equitable and injunctive relief as well as damages. The cases
that remain pending after September 30, 2024 are as follows:
District of Columbia (In re Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac Senior Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement Class Action
Litigations and Fairholme Funds v. FHFA ). Fannie Mae is a defendant in two cases filed in the U.S. District Court for the
District of Columbia, including a consolidated class action. The cases were consolidated for trial, and on August 14,
2023, the jury returned a verdict for the plaintiffs and awarded damages of $299.4 million to Fannie Mae preferred
stockholders. On March 20, 2024, the court entered final judgment and set the amount of prejudgment interest owed by
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
Legal Proceedings
Fannie Mae at $199.7 million . On April 17, 2024, the defendants filed a motion for judgment as a matter of law, which
has been fully briefed and remains pending. The parties will have 30 d ays to appeal following the court’s decision on the
motion . See “ Note 17, Commitments and Contingencies ” for additional information.
Western District of Michigan (Rop et al. v. FHFA et al.) . On June 1, 2017, preferred and common stockholders of Fannie
Mae and Freddie Mac filed a complaint for declaratory and injunctive relief against FHFA and Treasury in the U.S.
District Court for the Western District of Michigan. FHFA and Treasury moved to dismiss the case on September 8,
2017, and plaintiffs filed a motion for summary judgment on October 6, 2017. On September 8, 2020, the court denied
plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment and granted defendants’ motion to dismiss. On October 4, 2022, the U.S. Court
of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit reversed the dismissal and remanded the case to the district court to determine whether
the stockholders suffered compensable harm. On February 2, 2023, plaintiffs filed a petition with the Supreme Court
seeking review of the Sixth Circuit’s decision, which the Supreme Court denied on June 12, 2023. On August 11, 2023,
plaintiffs submitted a motion for leave to file an amended complaint in the district court, which the court denied on
December 11, 2024.
Eastern District of Pennsylvania (Wazee Street Opportunities Fund IV L.P. et al. v. FHFA et al.) . On August 16, 2018,
common stockholders of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac filed a complaint for declaratory and injunctive relief against
FHFA and Treasury in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. FHFA and Treasury moved to
dismiss the case on November 16, 2018, and plaintiffs filed a motion for summary judgment on December 21, 2018. On
July 1, 2024, plaintiffs filed a motion for leave to amend their complaint.
U.S. Court of Federal Claims (Fisher et al. v. United States of America). On December 2, 2013, common stockholders
of Fannie Mae filed a lawsuit against the United States that listed Fannie Mae as a nominal defendant. The plaintiffs
alleged that the net worth sweep dividend provisions of the senior preferred stock that were implemented pursuant to
the August 2012 amendment constituted a taking of Fannie Mae’s property without just compensation in violation of the
U.S. Constitution. On February 15, 2023, the court issued an order for plaintiffs to show cause why their claims should
not be dismissed, as claims similar to theirs brought by other Fannie Mae stockholders in other cases against the United
States had been dismissed by the court. On September 1, 2023, the court dismissed the case with prejudice. On
October 30, 2023, plaintiffs filed a notice of appeal.

---

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURE
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures
None.
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
PART II

---

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY
Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder
Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Common Stock
Our common stock is traded in the over-the-counter market and quoted on the OTCQB, operated by OTC Markets
Group Inc., under the ticker symbol “FNMA.” Over-the-counter market quotations for our common stock reflect inter-
dealer prices, without retail mark-up, mark-down or commission and may not necessarily represent actual transactions.
The transfer agent and registrar for our common stock is Computershare Trust Company, N.A., and its address is
P.O. Box 43006, Providence, RI 02940-3006 or, for overnight correspondence, 150 Royall St., Suite 101, Canton, MA
02021.
Holders
As of February 1, 2025 , we h ad approximatel y 7,300 registered holders of record of our common stock. In addition, as
of February 1, 2025 , Treasury held a warrant giving it the right to purchase shares of our common stock equal to 79.9%
of the total number of shares of our common stock outstanding on a fully diluted basis on the date of exercise.
Recent Sales of Unregistered Equity Securities
Under the terms of our senior preferred stock purchase agreement with Treasury, we are prohibited from selling or
issuing our equity interests without the prior written consent of Treasury except under limited circumstances described in
“Business- Conservatorship and Treasury Agreements -Treasury Agreements-Covenants.”
During the quarter ended December 31, 2024 , we did not sell any equity securities.
Information about Certain Securities Issuances by Fannie Mae
Pursuant to SEC regulations, public companies are required to disclose certain information when they incur a material
direct financial obligation or become directly or contingently liable for a material obligation under an off-balance sheet
arrangement. The disclosure must be made in a current report on Form 8-K under Item 2.03 or, if the obligation is
incurred in connection with certain types of securities offerings, in prospectuses for that offering that are filed with the
SEC.
Because the securities we issue are exempted securities under the Securities Act of 1933, we do not file registration
statements or prospectuses with the SEC with respect to our securities offerings. To comply with the disclosure
requirements of Form 8-K relating to the incurrence of material financial obligations, in accordance with a “no-action”
letter we received from the SEC staff in 2004, we report our incurrence of these types of obligations in offering circulars
or prospectuses (or supplements thereto) that we post on our website within the same time period that a prospectus for
a non-exempt securities offering would be required to be filed with the SEC. To the extent we incur a material financial
obligation that is not disclosed in this manner, we would file a Form 8-K if required to do so under applicable Form 8-K
requirements.
The website address for disclosure about our debt securities is www.fanniemae.com/debtsearch. From this address,
investors can access the offering circular and related supplements for debt securities offerings under Fannie Mae’s
universal debt facility, including pricing supplements for individual issuances of debt securities.
Disclosure about our obligations pursuant to the MBS we issue, some of which may be off-balance sheet obligations,
can be found at www.fanniemae.com/mbsdisclosure. From this address, investors can access information and
documents about our MBS, including prospectuses and related prospectus supplements.
We are providing our website address solely for your information. Information appearing on our website is not
incorporated into this report.
Our Purchases of Equity Securities
We did not repurchase any of our equity securities during the fourth quarter of 2024 .
Dividends
As described in “Business- Conservatorship and Treasury Agreements ,” our conservator has eliminated dividends on
our common and preferred stock (other than dividends on the senior preferred stock issued to Treasury) during the
conservatorship. In addition, under the terms of our senior preferred stock purchase agreement with Treasury, we may
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
not pay dividends or make other distributions on or repurchase our equity securities (other than the senior preferred
stock) without the prior written consent of Treasury.

---

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
Item 6. [Reserved]
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
MD&A | Key Market Economic Indicators

---

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations
You should read this MD&A together with our consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2024 and the
accompanying notes. This MD&A does not discuss 2022 performanc e or a comparison of 2022 versus 2023
performance for select areas where we have determined the omitted information is not necessary to understand our
current-period financial condition, changes in our financial condition, or our results. The omitted information may be
found in our 2023 Form 10-K, filed with the SEC on February 15, 2024 , in MD&A sections titled “Consolidated Results of
Operations,” “Single-Family Business,” “Multifamily Business,” and “Liquidity and Capital Management.”
Key Market Economic Indicators
Below we discuss how varying macroeconomic conditions can influence our financial results across different business
and economic environments. Our forecasts and expectations are based on many assumptions, subject to many
uncertainties and may change, perhaps substantially, from our current forecasts and expectations. See “ Forward-
Looking Statements ” and “ Risk Factors ” for a discussion of factors that could cause actual results to differ materially
from our current forecasts and expectations. For further discussion on housing activity, see “ Single-Family Business -
Single-Family Mortgage Market ” and “ Multifamily Business - Multifamily Mortgage Market .”
Selected Benchmark Interest Rates
(1) Refers to the U.S. weekly average fixed-rate mortgage rate according to Freddie Mac’s Primary Mortgage Market Survey ® . These rates are
reported using the latest available data for a given period.
(2) According to Bloomberg.
(3) Refers to the daily rate per the Federal Reserve Bank of New York.
How Interest Rates Can Affect Our Financial Results
• Net interest income . Changes in interest rates impact the timing of when we recognize certain components of
net interest income. Our primary source of net interest income is guaranty fees we receive for assuming the
credit risk on our guaranty book of business, which consists of upfront and base guaranty fees. Since we
amortize upfront guaranty fees over the contractual life of the loan, when a loan prepays, the remaining upfront
fees on the loan are recognized as income in that period. In a rising interest-rate environment, our mortgage
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
MD&A | Key Market Economic Indicators
loans generally prepay more slowly as borrowers are less likely to refinance, which typically results in lower
deferred guaranty fee income as those upfront fees are amortized into interest income over a longer period of
time. Conversely, in a declining interest-rate environment, our mortgage loans generally prepay faster as
borrowers are more likely to refinance, typically resulting in higher deferred guaranty fee income as loan
prepayments accelerate the realization of those upfront fees as interest income. However, since most of the
loans in our single-family guaranty book of business continue to have mortgage interest rates meaningfully
below the current prevailing rate as of December 31, 2024 , we may not experience higher deferred guaranty
fee income in a declining interest-rate environment unless mortgage interest rates drop to a level that is low
enough to incentivize more borrowers to refinance. Interest rates also affect the amount of interest income we
earn on our assets . Our corporate liquidity portfolio and certain mortgage-related assets typically earn more
interest income in a higher interest-rate environment and less interest income in a lower interest-rate
environment . On our corporate debt, we typically pay more interest in a higher interest-rate environment and
less interest in a lower interest-rate environment . See “ Consolidated Results of Operations - Net Interest
Income ” for a discussion of how interest rate changes impacted our financial results and for information on the
interest rates of the loans in our single-family conventional guaranty book of business compared to the
prevailing average 30-year fixed-rate mortgage rate as of year-end 2024 .
• Fair value gains (loss es ) . We have exposure to fair value gains and losses resulting from changes in interest
rates, primarily through our trading securities, mortgage commitment derivatives and risk management
derivatives, which we mark to market through earnings. Fair value gains and losses on our mortgage
commitment derivatives fluctuate depending on how interest rates and prices move between the time a
commitment is opened and when it settles. The net position and composition across the yield curve of our risk
management derivatives changes over time. As a result, interest rate changes (increases or decreases) and
yield curve changes (parallel, steepening or flattening shifts) will generate varying amounts of fair value gains
or losses in a given period. For more information about our fair value gains (losses), see “ Consolidated Results
of Operations - Fair Value Gains (Losses), Net .”
• Benefit (provision) for credit losses . When mortgage interest rates increase, our expected credit losses on
loans increases because (1) we generally expect fewer borrowers will refinance their loans, thereby extending
the expected life of the loan, which increases our expectation of loss and (2) borrowers with adjustable-rate
loans or multifamily loans with balloon balances due at maturity face increased costs and a reduced ability to
refinance. This increase in our expectation of loss contributes to our provision for credit losses. Conversely,
when mortgage interest rates decrease, our expectation of loss decreases, which reduces our provision for
credit losses. For more information on our benefit (provision) for credit losses, see “ Consolidated Results of
Operations - Benefit (Provision) for Credit Losses .”
Single-Family Annual Home Price Growth Rate (1)
(1) Calculated internally using property data on loans purchased by Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and other third-party home sales data. Fannie
Mae’s home price index is a weighted repeat transactions index, measuring average price changes in repeat sales on the same properties.
Fannie Mae’s home price index excludes prices on properties sold in foreclosure. Fannie Mae’s home price growth rates represent
estimates based on non-seasonally adjusted preliminary data and are subject to change as additional data becomes available.
How Home Prices Can Affect Our Financial Results
• Actual and forecasted home prices impact our provision or benefit for credit losses as well as the growth and
size of our guaranty book of business.
• Changes in home prices affect the amount of equity that borrowers have in their homes. Borrowers with less
equity typically have higher delinquency and default rates, particularly in times of economic stress.
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
MD&A | Key Market Economic Indicators
• As home prices increase, the severity of losses we incur on defaulted loans that we hold or guarantee
decreases because the amount we can recover from the properties securing the loans increases. Declines in
home prices may increase the losses we incur on defaulted loans.
• As home prices rise, the principal balance of loans associated with newly acquired purchase loans may
increase, causing growth in the size of our guaranty book. Additionally, rising home prices can increase the
amount of equity borrowers have in their home, which may lead to an increase in origination volumes for cash-
out refinance loans with higher principal balances than the existing loan. Replacing existing loans with newly
acquired cash-out refinances can affect the growth and size of our guaranty book.
• Home price growth on a national basis in creased from 5.5% in 2023 to 5.8% in 2024 . We expect home price
growth of 3.5% on a national basis in 2025 . We also expect regional variation in the timing and rate of home
price changes.
New Housing Starts (1)
(1) According to the U.S. Census Bureau and subject to revision.
How Housing Activity Can Affect Our Financial Results
• Housing is among the most interest-rate-sensitive sectors of the economy. In addition to interest rates, two key
aspects of economic activity that can impact supply and demand for housing, and thus our business and
financial results, are the rates of household formation and housing construction.
• Household formation is a key driver of demand for both single-family and multifamily housing as a newly formed
household will either rent or purchase a home. Thus, changes in the pace of household formation can affect
home prices, multifamily property values and credit performance as well as the degree of loss on defaulted
loans.
• Growth of household formation stimulates homebuilding. Homebuilding has typically been a cyclical leader,
weakening prior to a slowdown in U.S. economic activity and accelerating prior to a recovery, which contributes
to the growth of GDP and employment.
• A decline in housing starts results in fewer new homes being available for purchase and potentially a lower
volume of mortgage originations.
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
MD&A | Key Market Economic Indicators
GDP and Unemployment Rate
(1) Real GDP growth (decline) is based on the quarterly series calculated by the Bureau of Economic Analysis and are subject to revision.
(2) According to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics and subject to revision.
How GDP and the Unemployment Rate Can Affect Our Financial Results
• Changes in GDP and the unemployment rate can affect several mortgage market factors, including the demand
for both single-family and multifamily housing and the level of loan delinquencies, which impacts credit losses.
• Economic growth is a key factor for the performance of mortgage-related assets. In a growing economy,
employment and income are typically rising, thus allowing borrowers to meet payment requirements, existing
homeowners to consider purchasing and moving to another home, and renters to consider becoming
homeowners. Homebuilding typically increases to meet the rise in demand. Mortgage delinquencies typically
fall in an expanding economy, thereby decreasing credit losses.
• In a slowing economy, income growth and housing activity typically slow as an early indicator of reduced
economic activity, followed by slowing employment. Typically, as an economic slowdown intensifies,
households reduce their spending. This reduction in consumption then accelerates the slowdown. An economic
slowdown can lead to employment losses, impairing the ability of borrowers and renters to meet mortgage and
rental payments, thus causing loan delinquencies to rise.
• GDP increased in 2024 . We expect GDP will continue to grow in 2025 , but at a slower pace than in 2024 . The
unemployment rate remained relatively flat in 2024 , and we expect a slight increase in the unemployment rate
for 2025 .
• Potential changes to trade, fiscal, regulatory and immigration policies could materially impact our outlook for
interest rates, home price growth, housing activity and economic growth.
See “ Risk Factors - Credit Risk ” and “ Risk Factors - Market and Industry Risk ” for further discussion of risks to our
business and financial results associated with interest rates, home prices, housing activity, and economic conditions.
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
MD&A | Consolidated Results of Operations
Consolidated Results of Operations
This section discusses our consolidated results of operations and should be read together with our consolidated
financial statements and the accompanying notes.
Summary of Consolidated Results of Operations
For the Year Ended December 31,
Variance
2024 vs. 2023
2023 vs. 2022
(Dollars in millions)
Net interest income (1)
$ 28,748
$ 28,773
$ 29,423
$ (25)
$ (650)
Fee and other income (2)
(37)
Net revenues
29,069
29,048
29,735
(687)
Benefit (provision) for credit losses
1,670
(6,277)
(1,484)
7,947
Fair value gains (losses), net
1,821
1,304
1,284
Investment gains (losses), net
(38)
(53)
(297)
Non-interest expense:
Administrative expenses (3)
(3,619)
(3,445)
(3,197)
(174)
(248)
Legislative assessments (4)
(3,766)
(3,745)
(3,788)
(21)
Credit enhancement expense (5)
(1,641)
(1,512)
(1,323)
(129)
(189)
Change in expected credit enhancement recoveries (6)
(193)
(920)
Other expenses, net (7)
(937)
(1,118)
(631)
(487)
Total non-interest expense
(9,769)
(10,013)
(8,212)
(1,801)
Income before federal income taxes
21,269
21,956
16,233
(687)
5,723
Provision for federal income taxes
(4,291)
(4,548)
(3,310)
(1,238)
Net income
$ 16,978
$ 17,408
$ 12,923
$ (430)
$ 4,485
Total comprehensive income
$ 16,975
$ 17,405
$ 12,920
$ (430)
$ 4,485
(1) Includes net interest income generated by the 10 basis point guaranty fee increase we implemented pursuant to the Temporary Payroll Tax
Cut Continuation Act of 2011, and as extended by the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, which is paid to Treasury and not retained by
us.
(2) Single-family fee and other income consists primarily of compensation for engaging in structured transactions and providing other lender
services. Multifamily fee and other income consists of fees associated with certain Multifamily business activities such as credit
enhancements for tax-exempt multifamily housing revenue bonds.
(3) Consists of (1) salaries and employee benefits, and (2) professional service s, technology and occupancy expenses.
(4) Consists of TCCA fees, affordable housing allocations and FHFA assessments. TCCA fees refers to the portion of our single-family
guaranty fees paid to Treasury pursuant to the TCCA.
(5) Single-family credit enhancement expense consists of costs associated with our freestanding credit enhancements, which primarily include
our CAS and CIRT programs, enterprise-paid mortgage insurance (“EPMI”) and certain lender risk-sharing programs. Multifamily credit
enhancement expense primarily consists of costs associated with our Multifamily CIRT TM (“MCIRT TM ”) and Multifamily CAS (“MCAS TM ”)
programs as well as amortization expense for certain lender risk-sharing programs. Excludes CAS transactions accounted for as debt
instruments and credit risk transfer programs accounted for as derivative instruments.
(6) Consists of change in benefits recognized from our freestanding credit enhancements, primarily from our CAS and CIRT programs as well
as certain lender risk-sharing arrangements, including our multifamily Delegated Underwriting and Servicing (“DUS ® ”) program.
(7) Consists of debt extinguishment gains and losses , expenses associated with legal claims, foreclosed property income (expense), gains
and losses from partnership investments, loan subservicing costs, and servicer fees paid in connection with certain loss mitigation
activities.
Net Interest Income
Overview
Our primary source of net interest income is guaranty fees we receive for assuming the credit risk on mortgage loans
underlying Fannie Mae MBS held by third parties. We recognize almost all of our guaranty fee revenue in net interest
income because, in our consolidated balance sheets, we consolidate the substantial majority of mortgage loans
underlying our Fannie Mae MBS. Guaranty fees from these mortgage loans account for the difference between the
interest income on mortgage loans in consolidated trusts and the interest expense on the debt of consolidated trusts.
We also earn interest income from our corporate liquidity portfolio and retained mortgage portfolio as described below.
In addition, income or expense from hedge accounting is a component of our net interest income.
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
MD&A | Consolidated Results of Operations
Net Interest Income from Guaranty Book of Business
For single-family mortgage loans, there are two components of our guaranty fees:
• Base fees. These fees are ongoing fees that factor into a mortgage loan’s interest rate, which are collected
each month over the life of the mortgage loan.
• Upfront fees . These fees are one-time payments made by lenders upon loan delivery to us. Upfront fees
include risk-based fees, referred to as “loan-level price adjustments,” that vary by the attributes of the loan and
the borrower (such as loan size, LTV ratio, borrower credit score, etc.) . Upfront fees also include payments we
make to and receive from lenders to adjust the monthly contractual guaranty fee rate on a Fannie Mae MBS.
These fees are initially recorded as cost basis adjustments to the mortgage loan and are then amortized into
net interest income over the contractual life of the loa n.
For multifamily mortgage loans, base fees are the primary component of our guaranty fee.
In our “ Components of Net Interest Income” table, we display net interest income from our guaranty book of business in
three categories:
• Base guaranty fee income excluding TCCA, which primarily consists of ongoing monthly fees that are
contractually due to us for assuming credit risk and that we collect and recognize each month over the life of
the mortgage loan, excluding the portion of those fees related to the TCCA described below.
• Base guaranty fee income related to TCCA, which is the portion of the base fees we collect that are not
retained by us but paid to Treasury pursuant to the Temporary Payroll Tax Cut Continuation Act of 2011, as
amended.
• Deferred guaranty fee income, which primarily represents income from the upfront fees described above that
are amortized into net interest income. Deferred guaranty fee income also includes the amortization of cost
basis adjustments on our mortgage loans and debt of consolidated trusts that are not associated with upfront
fees. These basis adjustments consist of premiums and discounts that are established when we initially
recognize mortgage loans and debt of consolidated trusts in our consolidated balance sheets at fair value. We
amortize these basis adjustments over the contractual life of the associated financial instrumen t.
Other Sources of Net Interest Income
Net Interest Income from Portfolios
We also recognize net interest income on the difference between interest income earned on the assets in our retained
mortgage portfolio and our corporate liquidity portfolio (collectively, our “portfolios”) and the interest expense associated
with our funding debt. See “ Retained Mortgage Portfolio ” and “ Liquidity and Capital Management - Liquidity
Management - Corporate Liquidity Portfolio ” for more information about our portfolios.
Income (Expense) from Hedge Accounting
To reduce the impact of interest-rate volatility on our financial results, we apply fair value hedge accounting. As a result,
during the hedging period, we recognize fair value changes attributable to movements in benchmark interest rates for
mortgage loans, funding debt, and the related interest-rate swaps in the hedging relationships, as a component of net
interest income. We also recognize the amortization of hedge-related basis adjustments and any related interest accrual
on the swaps as a component of net interest income.
As of December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, we had $2.6 billion , $3.6 billion and $4.1 billion , respectively, in net
cumulative fair value hedge basis adjustments. These adjustments have been or will be amortized as net expenses over
the remaining contractual life of the respective hedged items in the “Income (expense) from hedge accounting” line item
in the “Components of Net Interest Income” table below. The substantial majority of these hedge basis adjustments
relate to our funding debt. See “ Note 1, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies ” and “ Note 9, Derivative
Instruments ” for more information about our hedge accounting program.
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
MD&A | Consolidated Results of Operations
Components of Net Interest Income
The table below displays the components of our net interest income from our guaranty book of business, from our
portfolios, as well as from hedge accounting.
Components of Net Interest Income
For the Year Ended December 31,
Variance
2024 vs. 2023
2023 vs. 2022
(Dollars in millions)
Net interest income from guaranty book of business:
Base guaranty fee income excluding TCCA
$ 16,557
$ 16,155
$ 16,072
$ 402
$ 83
Base guaranty fee income related to TCCA (1)
3,442
3,431
3,369
Net deferred guaranty fee income (2)
3,291
4,003
7,099
(712)
(3,096)
Total net interest income from guaranty book of business
23,290
23,589
26,540
(299)
(2,951)
Net interest income from portfolios (3)
6,298
6,173
2,954
3,219
Income (expense) from hedge accounting (4)
(840)
(989)
(71)
(918)
Total net interest income
$ 28,748
$ 28,773
$ 29,423
$ (25)
$ (650)
(1) Represents revenues generated by the 10 basis point guaranty fee increase we implemented pursuant to the TCCA, the incremental
revenue from which is paid to Treasury and not retained by us.
(2) Excludes the amortization of cost basis adjustments resulting from hedge accounting, which is included in income (expense) from hedge
accounting.
(3) Includes interest income from assets held in our retained mortgage portfolio and our corporate liquidity portfolio, as well as other assets
used to support lender liquidity. Also includes interest expense on our funding debt, including outstanding CAS debt.
(4) For more information about our hedge accounting program, see “ Note 1, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies ” and “ Note 9,
Derivative Instruments .”
Net interest income was relatively flat in 2024 compared with 2023 . The $25 million decline was driven by lower
deferred guaranty fee income, primarily offset by higher income from base guaranty fees and lower expense from hedge
accounting.
• Lower deferred guaranty fee income. Deferred guaranty fee income represents income from the upfront fees
that are amortized into net interest income, and also includes the amortization of cost basis adjustments on our
mortgage loans and debt of consolidated trusts that are not associated with upfront fees, as described above.
The decrease in deferred guaranty fee income in 2024 compared to 2023 was primarily driven by less income
from the amortization of premiums on debt of consolidated trusts. This decrease was largely driven by rising
interest rates throughout much of 2023 and 2024, which reduced the prices of newly issued MBS debt thereby
decreasing premiums.
• Higher base guaranty fee income. Higher base guaranty fee income was primarily driven by higher average
guaranty fees on recent single-family acquisitions.
• Lower expense from hedge accounting . We had lower expense from hedge accounting in 2024 compared with
2023, primarily driven by lower interest expense on derivatives in hedging relationships.
Net interest income decreased slightly in 2023 compared with 2022 , primarily as a result of lower deferred guaranty fee
income and higher expense from hedge accounting largely offset by higher income from portfolios.
• Lower deferred guaranty fee income. Throughout most of 2023 , we were in a higher interest-rate environment
and observed significantly lower volumes of refinancing activity compared with 2022 . As a result, we had lower
deferred guaranty fee income in 2023 compared with 2022 . For a description of how fewer mortgage loan
prepayments results typically in lower deferred guaranty fee income, refer to “ Key Market Economic Indicators
- How Interest Rates Can Affect Our Financial Results -Net Interest Income.”
• Higher income from portfolios. Higher income from portfolios in 2023 compared with 2022 was primarily driven
by generally higher interest rates in 2023 than in 2022 on securities in our corporate liquidity portfolio, primarily
U.S. Treasuries and securities purchased under agreements to resell. This was partially offset by higher
interest expense on funding debt, also as a result of higher interest rates.
• Higher expenses from hedge accounting. Hedge accounting expenses increased in 2023 compared to 2022
due to higher amortization of fair value hedge-related basis adjustments. This was coupled with an increase in
interest expenses on derivatives in hedging relationships as a result of rising interest rates in the first three
quarters of 2023 .
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
MD&A | Consolidated Results of Operations
Analysis of Unamortized Deferred Guaranty Fees
As shown in the chart below (on the left), most of our single-family conventional guaranty book of business as of
December 31, 2024 had an interest rate lower than the average 30-year fixed-rate mortgage rate. Per Freddie Mac’s
Primary Mortgage Market Survey ® , as of December 26, 2024, the U.S. weekly average interest rate for a single-family
30-year fixed-rate mortgage was 6.85% . Accordingly, even if interest rates decline meaningfully, most of the borrowers
whose mortgage loans are in our single-family conventional guaranty book of business still would not be incentivized to
refinance.
The other chart below (on the right) presents guaranty fees that will be amortized into deferred guaranty fee income in
future periods, which we refer to as “unamortized deferred guaranty fees.” Deferred guaranty fees primarily result from
the upfront fees that we receive on single-family loans we acquire, which are recorded as cost basis adjustments to the
mortgage loan. Deferred guaranty fees also include cost basis adjustments on our mortgage loans and debt of
consolidated trusts that are not associated with upfront fees, such as premiums and discounts. We amortize these cost
basis adjustments as deferred guaranty fee income over the remaining contractual life of the mortgage loans or debt. As
discussed in “Key Market Economic Indicators,” the timing of when we recognize deferred guaranty fee income depends
on the life of the mortgage loan, which, for single-family in particular, is sensitive to changes in mortgage interest rates
as those changes impact the borrowers’ incentive to refinance.
Interest Rates of Single-Family
Conventional Guaranty Book of Business
Compared with Average 30-Year Fixed-
Rate Mortgage Rate
Unamortized Deferred Guaranty Fees (1)
As of December 31, 2024
(Dollars in billions)
-
Represents the average 30-year fixed-rate mortgage rate
as of December 26, 2024, according to Freddie Mac’s
Primary Mortgage Market Survey ® , the last published rate
for the year ending December 31, 2024 .
(1)
Beginning December 31, 2024, the table excludes fair value
hedging adjustments of consolidated trusts. Prior periods
have been updated in this report to conform to the current
period presentation.
-
Represents the percentage of single-family conventional
guaranty book of business by select interest rate band
based on the current interest rate of the mortgage loans.
The amount of deferred guaranty fee income we record can vary and is primarily impacted by: (1) the amount of upfront
fees we charge on single-family mortgage loans, and (2) changes in interest rates, which affect the premiums and
discounts we record on newly acquired mortgage loans and newly created debt of consolidated trusts. The balance of
our unamortized deferred guaranty fees decreased as of 2024 , compared with 2023 , largely as a result of amortization
of existing deferred guaranty fees outpacing upfront guaranty fees received on newly acquired single-family loans. In
addition, rising interest rates throughout much of 2024 impacted premiums on newly issued MBS debt as prices
declined, which further reduced the balance of unamortized deferred guaranty fees.
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
MD&A | Consolidated Results of Operations
Analysis of Net Interest Income
The table below displays an analysis of our net interest income, average balances and related yields earned on assets
and incurred on liabilities. For most components of the average balances, we use a daily weighted average of unpaid
principal balance net of unamortized cost basis adjustments. When daily average balance information is not available,
such as for mortgage loans, we use monthly averages.
Analysis of Net Interest Income and Yield (1)
For the Year Ended December 31,
Average
Balance
Interest
Income/
(Expense)
Average
Rates
Earned/
Paid
Average
Balance
Interest
Income/
(Expense)
Average
Rates
Earned/
Paid
Average
Balance
Interest
Income/
(Expense)
Average
Rates
Earned/
Paid
(Dollars in millions)
Interest-earning assets:
Cash and cash equivalents (2)
$ 47,335
$ 2,486
5.25 %
$ 57,589
$ 2,925
5.08 %
$ 57,471
$ 924
1.61 %
Securities purchased under agreements
to resell
42,734
2,291
5.36
40,992
2,120
5.17
25,374
2.04
Investments in securities (3)
58,863
1,430
2.43
54,857
1,233
2.25
70,774
1.28
Mortgage loans:
Mortgage loans of Fannie Mae
$ 51,403
$ 2,288
4.45 %
$ 52,074
$ 2,438
4.68 %
$ 60,587
$ 2,835
4.68 %
Mortgage loans of consolidated trusts
4,091,884
141,864
3.47
4,082,569
130,796
3.20
4,019,332
114,978
2.86
Total mortgage loans (4)
4,143,287
144,152
3.48
4,134,643
133,234
3.22
4,079,919
117,813
2.89
Advances to lenders
3,174
6.52
3,137
6.44
5,170
2.52
Total interest-earning assets
$ 4,295,393
$ 150,566
3.51 %
$ 4,291,218
$ 139,714
3.25 %
$ 4,238,708
$ 120,297
2.84 %
Interest-bearing liabilities:
Short-term funding debt
$ 11,674
$ (595)
5.10
$ 13,440
$ (672)
5.00
$ 4,429
$ (76)
1.69
Long-term funding debt
106,238
(4,009)
3.77
113,958
(3,624)
3.18
139,098
(2,481)
1.78
CAS debt
2,341
(267)
11.41
4,021
(415)
10.32
8,658
(511)
5.90
Total debt of Fannie Mae
120,253
(4,871)
4.05
131,419
(4,711)
3.58
152,185
(3,068)
2.02
Debt securities of consolidated trusts
held by third parties
4,082,271
(116,947)
2.86
4,083,997
(106,230)
2.60
4,030,467
(87,806)
2.18
Total interest-bearing liabilities
$ 4,202,524
$ (121,818)
2.90 %
$ 4,215,416
$ (110,941)
2.63 %
$ 4,182,652
$ (90,874)
2.17 %
Net interest income/net interest yield
$ 28,748
0.67 %
$ 28,773
0.67 %
$ 29,423
0.69 %
(1) Includes the effects of discounts, premiums and other cost basis adjustments, including basis adjustments related to hedge accounting.
(2) Prior to March 31, 2024, “Cash and cash equivalents” were previously reported within “Investments in securities.” The prior periods have
been updated to conform to the current period presentation.
(3) Consists of U.S. Treasuries not classified as cash equivalents and mortgage-related securities.
(4) Average balance includes mortgage loans on nonaccrual status. Interest income includes loan fees of $2.8 billion , $2.8 billion and
$5.1 billion for the years ended 2024 , 2023 and 2022 , respectively. Loan fees primarily consist of yield maintenance revenue we
recognized on the prepayment of multifamily mortgage loans and the amortization of upfront cash fees exchanged when we acquire the
mortgage loan.
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
MD&A | Consolidated Results of Operations
The table below displays the change in our net interest income between periods and the extent to which that variance is
attributable to: (1) changes in the volume of our interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities or (2) changes in
the interest rates of these assets and liabilities.
Rate/Volume Analysis of Changes in Net Interest Income
2024 vs. 2023
2023 vs. 2022
Total
Variance
Variance Due to: (1)
Total
Variance
Variance Due to: (1)
Volume
Rate
Volume
Rate
(Dollars in millions)
Interest income:
Cash and cash equivalents (2)
$ (439)
$ (535)
$ 96
$ 2,001
$ 2
$ 1,999
Securities purchased under agreements to resell
1,596
1,133
Investments in securities (3)
(239)
Mortgage loans:
Mortgage loans of Fannie Mae
(150)
(31)
(119)
(397)
(398)
Mortgage loans of consolidated trusts
11,068
10,769
15,818
1,834
13,984
Total mortgage loans
10,918
10,650
15,421
1,436
13,985
Advances to lenders
(68)
Total interest income
10,852
(80)
10,932
19,417
1,594
17,823
Interest expense:
Short-term funding debt
(12)
(596)
(307)
(289)
Long-term funding debt
(385)
(643)
(1,143)
(1,657)
CAS debt
(40)
(263)
Total debt of Fannie Mae
(160)
(695)
(1,643)
(2,209)
Debt securities of consolidated trusts held by third parties
(10,717)
(10,762)
(18,424)
(1,181)
(17,243)
Total interest expense
(10,877)
(11,457)
(20,067)
(615)
(19,452)
Net interest income
$ (25)
$ 500
$ (525)
$ (650)
$ 979
$ (1,629)
(1) Combined rate/volume variances are allocated between rate and volume based on the relative size of each variance.
(2) Prior to March 31, 2024, “Cash and cash equivalents” were previously reported within “Investments in securities.” The prior periods have
been updated to conform to the current period presentation. Cash equivalents are composed of overnight reverse repurchase agreements
and U.S. Treasuries, if any, that have a maturity at the date of acquisition of three months or less.
(3) Consists of U.S. Treasuries not classified as cash equivalents and mortgage-related securities.
Benefit (Provision) for Credit Losses
Our benefit or provision for credit losses can vary substantially from period to period based on a number of factors, such
as changes in actual and forecasted home prices or multifamily property valuations, fluctuations in actual and
forecasted interest rates, the credit risk profile of our new acquisitions, borrower payment behavior, events such as
natural disasters or pandemics, the types, volume and effectiveness of our loss mitigation activities, including
forbearances and loan modifications, the volume of foreclosures completed and the volume and pricing of loans
redesignated from held for investment (“HFI”) to held for sale (“ HFS”). T he benefit or provision for credit losses includes
our benefit or provision for loan losses, accrued interest receivable losses, our guaranty loss reserves and credit losses
on our available-for-sale (“ AFS”) debt securities.
Our benefit or provision for credit losses and our related loss reserves can also be impacted by updates to the models,
assumptions and data used in determining our allowance for loan losses. Although we believe the estimates underlying
our allowance as of December 31, 2024 are reasonable, they are subject to uncertainty. Changes in future economic
conditions and loan performance from our current expectations may result in volatility in our allowance for loan losses
and, as a result, our benefit or provision for credit losses. See “ Critical Accounting Estimates ” for additional information
about how our estimate of credit losses is subject to uncertainty. See “ Risk Factors - Credit Risk ” for a discussion of
factors that could result in significant provisions for credit losses on the loans in our book of business.
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
MD&A | Consolidated Results of Operations
The table below presents our single-family and multifamily benefit or provision for credit losses and the change in
expected credit enhancement recoveries.
Components of Benefit (Provision) for Credit Losses and Change in Expected Credit
Enhancement Recoveries
For the Year Ended December 31,
(Dollars in millions)
Benefit (provision) for credit losses:
Single-family benefit (provision) for credit losses
$ 938
$ 2,165
$ (5,029)
Multifamily benefit (provision) for credit losses
(752)
(495)
(1,248)
Total benefit (provision) for credit losses
$ 186
$ 1,670
$ (6,277)
Change in expected credit enhancement recoveries: (1)
Single-family
$ (134)
$ (310)
$ 470
Multifamily
Total change in expected credit enhancement recoveries
$ 194
$ (193)
$ 727
(1) Consists of estimated changes in benefits from our freestanding credit enhancements.
Single-Family Benefit (Provision) for Credit Losses
Our single-family benefit for credit losses in 2024 was primarily driven by improvements to our longer-term single-family
home price forecast, partially offset by provision from the risk profile of newly acquired loans, and provision related to
higher mortgage interest rates.
• Home price forecast benefit . We recognized a benefit from improvements to our longer-term single-family home
price forecast. Higher home prices decrease the likelihood that loans will default and reduce the amount of
losses on loans that default, which impacts our estimate of losses and ultimately reduces our loss reserves and
provision for credit losses.
• Provision for newly acquired loans. The provision for newly acquired loans was primarily driven by the credit
risk profile of our 2024 single-family acquisitions, which primarily consisted of purchase loans. Purchase loans
generally have higher origination LTV ratios than refinance loans; therefore, purchase loans generally have a
higher estimated risk of default and loss severity in the allowance than refinance loans and a correspondingly
higher credit loss provision at the time of acquisition.
• Provision for higher interest rates. We also recognized provision from higher mortgage interest rates. As
mortgage rates increase, we expect a decrease in future prepayments on single-family loans. Lower expected
prepayments extend the expected life of the loan, which increases our expectation of credit losses.
See “ Key Market Economic Indicators ” for additional information about how home prices and interest rates affect our
credit loss estimates, including a discussion of home price growth and our home price forecast. Also see “ Critical
Accounting Estimates ” for more information about our home price and interest rate forecasts and how they can impact
our single-family benefit (provision) for credit losses.
Our single-family benefit for credit losses in 2023 was primarily driven by a benefit from actual and forecasted home
price growth, partially offset by a provision from changes in loan activity and a provision relating to the redesignation of
loans from HFI to HFS, as described below:
• Benefit from actual and forecasted home price growth . During 2023 , we observed stronger than expected
actual and forecasted home price appreciation.
• Provision from changes in loan activity. This includes provision on newly acquired loans and was primarily
driven by the credit risk profile of our 2023 single-family acquisitions, which had a higher proportion of purchase
loans compared with our 2022 single-family acquisitions.
• Provision from redesignation of loans from HFI to HFS . In 2023 we redesignated certain nonperforming and
reperforming single-family loans from HFI to HFS, as we no longer intended to hold them for the foreseeable
future or to maturity. Upon redesignation, these loans had an amortized cost of $3.3 billion with a related
allowance of $42 million. Since interest rates on the loans were below current market interest rates, their
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
MD&A | Consolidated Results of Operations
carrying value exceeded their fair value at the time of redesignation, which resulted in a write-off against the
allowance of $658 million, with a net impact of $616 million in additional provision for credit losses.
Multifamily Benefit (Provision) for Credit Losses
Our multifamily provision for credit losses in 2024 was primarily driven by declining multifamily property values, an
increase in multifamily loan delinquencies, and provision related to our estimate of losses on loans involving fraud or
suspected fraud. These factors were partially offset by an improved long-term forecast of multifamily property net
operating income (“NOI”).
• Provision relating to declining multifamily property values . During 2024 , multifamily property values declined,
primarily due to elevated interest rates resulting in higher market yield requirements. This decrease in property
values led to higher LTV ratios for loans in our multifamily guaranty book of business, which drove higher
estimated risk of default and loss severity in the allowance and theref ore a higher credit los s provision.
• Provision relating to increased delinquencies. Multifamily loan delinquencies increased in 2024 , particularly for
adjustable-rate conventional loans that became seriously delinquent and were written down to their net
recoverable amount, which contributed to the multifamily provision for credit losses.
• Provision relating to fraud or suspected fraud . Expected losses relating to multifamily lending transactions
involving fraud or suspected fraud further heightened the risk of default and added to our multifamily credit loss
provision.
• Benefit relating to improved NOI forecast. Our forecast of NO I on multifamily properties improved compared to
our prior forecast, which also positively impacted our projection of multifamily p roperty values. T his
improvement in our NOI forecast was primarily due to a refinement of our forecast assumptions to use the
average NOI historical growth rate for a longer period of the forecast.
See “ Critical Accounting Estimates ” for more information about our NOI and property value growth estimates and how
they can affect our multifamily benefit (provision) for credit losses.
The primary factors that contributed to our multifamily provision for credit losses in 2023 were:
• Provision from changes in loan activity . This was primarily driven by new acquisitions resulting in book growth,
as well as increased delinquencies and declining DSCRs on the multifamily guaranty book, particularly in
instances where the DSCR declined to at or below a 1.0x coverage ratio.
• Provision from actual and projected economic data. Multifamily property values decreased throughout 2023,
which resulted in higher estimated LTV ratios on the loans in our multifamily guaranty book of business,
resulting in a provision for credit losses.
Change in Expected Credit Enhancement Recoveries
Change in expected credit enhancement recoveries consists of the change in benefits recognized from our freestanding
credit enhancements, including any realized amounts. Change in expected credit enhancement recoveries shifted from
expense in 2023 to income in 2024 driven by the larger multifamily provision for credit losses in 2024 . T he increase in
estimated credit losses on our multifamily guaranty book of business increased the amount we expect to receive from
our multifamily loss sharing arrangements.
Fair Value Gains (Losses), Net
The estimated fair value of our derivatives, trading securities and other financial instruments carried at fair value may
fluctuate substantially from period to period because of changes in interest rates, the yield curve, mortgage and credit
spreads and implied volatility, as well as activity related to these financial instruments.
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
MD&A | Consolidated Results of Operations
The table below displays the components of our fair value gains and losses. Fair value gains, net in 2024 were driven
by gains on risk management derivatives, trading securities and mortgage commitment derivatives. Gains on risk
management derivatives and mortgage commitment derivatives were primarily due to rising interest rates, and the gains
on trading securities were primarily driven by holdings of U.S. Treasury securities moving closer to maturity, which
resulted in the reversal of previously recorded fair value losses.
Fair Value Gains (Losses), Net
For the Year Ended December 31,
(Dollars in millions)
Risk management derivatives fair value gains (losses) attributable to:
Net contractual interest income (expense) on interest-rate swaps (1)
$ (1,074)
$ (1,444)
$ (492)
Net change in fair value during the period
1,997
1,311
(1,891)
Impact of hedge accounting (2)
(163)
2,763
Risk management derivatives fair value gains (losses), net
Mortgage commitment derivatives fair value gains (losses), net
2,708
Credit enhancement derivatives fair value gains (losses), net
(82)
(97)
Total derivatives fair value gains (losses), net
1,211
2,991
Trading securities gains (losses), net
1,006
(3,504)
Long-term debt fair value gains (losses), net
(308)
2,265
Other, net (3)
(19)
(468)
Fair value gains (losses), net
$ 1,821
$ 1,304
$ 1,284
(1) Net contractual interest income (expense) on interest-rate swaps is p rimarily impacted by changes in interest rates and changes in the
composition of our interest-rate swaps portfolio.
(2) The “Impact of hedge accounting” reflected in this table shows the net gain or loss from swaps in hedging relationships plus any accrued
interest during the applicable periods that are recognized in “Net interest income.” For more information about our hedge accounting
program, see “ Note 1, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies ” and “ Note 9, Derivative Instruments .”
(3) Consists primarily of fair value gains and losses on mortgage loans held at fair value.
Risk Management Derivatives Fair Value Gains (Losses), Net
Risk management derivative instruments are an integral part of our interest-rate risk management strategy. We
supplement our issuance of debt securities with derivative instruments to further reduce duration risk, which includes
prepayment risk. We purchase option-based risk management derivatives to economically hedge prepayment risk. In
cases where options obtained through callable debt issuances are not needed for risk management derivative
purposes, we may sell options in the over-the-counter (“OTC”) derivatives market in order to offset the options obtained
in the callable debt. Our principal purpose in using derivatives is to manage our aggregate interest-rate risk profile within
prescribed risk parameters. We generally use only derivatives that are relatively liquid and straightforward to value. We
consider the cost of derivatives used in our management of interest-rate risk to be an inherent part of the cost of funding
and hedging our mortgage investments and economically similar to the interest expense that we recognize on the debt
we issue to fund our mortgage investments.
We present, by derivative instrument type, the fair value gains and losses on our derivatives in “ Note 9, Derivative
Instruments .” The primary factors that may affect the fair value of our risk management derivatives include the following:
• Changes in interest rates. Our primary derivative instruments are interest-rate swaps, including pay-fixed and
receive-fixed interest-rate swaps. Pay-fixed swaps decrease in value and receive-fixed swaps increase in value
as swap rates decrease (with the opposite being true when swap rates increase). Because the composition of
our pay-fixed and receive-fixed derivatives varies across the yield curve, different yield curve changes (that is,
parallel, steepening or flattening) will generate different gains and losses. Changes in the fair value of
derivatives in hedging relationships are recorded in “ Net interest income .”
• Changes in our derivative activity. The mix and balance of our derivative portfolio changes from period to period
as we enter into or terminate derivative instruments to respond to changes in interest rates and changes in the
balances and modeled characteristics of our assets and liabilities. Changes in the composition of our derivative
portfolio affect the derivative fair value gains and losses we recognize in a given period.
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
MD&A | Consolidated Results of Operations
Additional factors that affect the fair value of our risk management derivatives include implied interest-rate volatility and
the time value of purchased or sold options.
We recognized net fair value gains on risk management derivatives in 2024 primarily as a result of increasing interest
rates, partially offset by contractual interest expense on our interest-rate swaps.
We recognized net fair value gains on risk management derivatives in 2023 primarily as a result of increasing interest
rates in the first three quarters of 2023 , partially offset by increased contractual interest expense on our interest-rate
swaps.
For additional information on our use of derivatives to manage interest-rate risk, see “ Risk Management - Market Risk
Management, including Interest-Rate Risk Management - Interest-Rate Risk Management .”
Mortgage Commitment Derivatives Fair Value Gains (Losses), Net
We account for certain commitments to purchase or sell mortgage-related securities and to purchase single-family
mortgage loans as derivatives. For open mortgage commitment derivatives, we include changes in their fair value in our
consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income. When derivative purchase commitments settle, we
include the fair value of the commitment on the settlement date in the cost basis of the loan or security we purchase.
When derivative commitments to sell securities settle, we include the fair value of the commitment on the settlement
date in the cost basis of the security we sell. Purchases of securities issued by our consolidated MBS trusts are treated
as extinguishments of debt; we recognize the fair value of the commitment on the settlement date as a component of
debt extinguishment gains and losses in “Other expenses, net.” Sales of securities issued by our consolidated MBS
trusts are treated as issuances of consolidated debt; we recognize the fair value of the commitment on the settlement
date as a component of debt in the cost basis of the debt issued.
We recognized fair value gains on our mortgage commitments in 2024 primarily due to rising interest rates, partially
offset by fair value losses in the third quarter, caused by decreasing interest rates.
We recognized fair value gains on our mortgage commitments in 2023 primarily due to rising interest rates in the first
three quarters of 2023 . These gains were partially offset by fair value losses in the fourth quarter of 2023 due to
decreasing interest rates and tightening of the secondary spread, which is the spread between the 30-year MBS current
coupon yield and 10-year U.S. Treasury rate.
Trading Securities Gains (Losses), Net
We measure trading securities at fair value in our consolidated balance sheets with subsequent changes in fair value
recorded as “ Fair value gains (losses), net ” in our consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income.
The changes in the fair value of our trading securities are included in “ Trading securities gains (losses), net ” in the table
above.
Gains on trading securities in 2024 were primarily driven by holdings of U.S. Treasury securities moving closer to
maturity. As a result, previously recognized fair value losses were reversed, resulting in a net gain on our fixed-rate
securities held in our corporate liquidity portfolio.
Gains on trading securities in 2023 were primarily driven by the decrease in U.S. Treasury yields in the fourth quarter of
2023 , which resulted in a net gain on our fixed-rate securities held in our corporate liquidity portfolio.
Long-Term Debt Fair Value Gains (Losses), Net
We generally elect the fair value option for our long-term debt when the accounting guidance would otherwise require us
to separate a derivative from the debt contract and record that derivative at fair value. The changes in the fair value of
our long-term debt held at fair value are included in “Long-term debt fair value gains (losses), net” in the table above.
Gains on long-term debt held at fair value in 2024 were due to decreases in the fair value of long-term debt of
consolidated trusts held at fair value, driven by rising interest rates.
Losses on long-term debt held at fair value in 2023 were due to an increase in the fair value of long-term debt of
consolidated trusts held at fair value, driven by decreasing interest rates and tightening of the secondary spread during
the fourth quarter of 2023 .
Administrative Expenses
Administrative expenses consists of salaries and employee benefits, professional services, and technology and
occupancy costs. Administrative expenses were $3.6 billion in 2024 compared with $3.4 billion in 2023 . By remaining
disciplined on costs within our control, we kept the increase in our administrative expenses to 5% .
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
MD&A | Consolidated Results of Operations
Legislative Assessments
Legislativ e assessmen ts consists of TCCA fees, FHFA a ssessm ents and affordable housing allocations .
• TCCA fees ar e the expense recognized as a result of the 10 basis point increase in guaranty fees on all single-
family mortgages delivered to us on or after April 1, 2012 pursuant to the Temporary Payroll Tax Cut
Continuation Act of 2011 and as extended by the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, which we pay to
Treasury.
• FHFA assessments are expenses relating to our obligation to pay FHFA to cover a portion of its costs,
expenses and working capital. Under the GSE Act, FHFA is authorized to establish and collect annual
assessments from its regulated entities, including Fannie Mae, to provide for the payment of FHFA’s costs and
expenses and to maintain a working capital fund.
• Affordable housing allocations relates to the GSE Act requirement to set aside each year an amount equal to
4.2 basis points of the unpaid principal balance of our new business purchases and to pay this amount to
specified HUD and Treasury funds in support of affordable housing. In March 2024 , we paid $155 million to the
funds based on our new business purchases in 2023 . For 2024 , we recognized an expense of $160 million
related to this obligation based on $381.1 billion in new business purchases during the year. We expect to pay
this amount to the funds in 2025 .
For additional information on our TCCA fees, FHFA assessments and affordable housing allocations, see “Certain
Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence-Transactions with Related Persons” and “Note 2,
Conservatorship, Senior Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement and Related Matters-Related Parties .”
The table below displays the components of our legislative assessments.
Legislative Assessments
For the Year Ended December 31,
(Dollars in millions)
TCCA fees
$ 3,442
$ 3,431
$ 3,369
FHFA assessments
Affordable housing allocations:
Treasury’s Capital Magnet Fund
HUD’s Housing Trust Fund
Total affordable housing allocations
Total legislative assessments
$ 3,766
$ 3,745
$ 3,788
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
MD&A | Consolidated Balance Sheet Analysis
Consolidated Balance Sheet Analysis
This section discusses our consolidated balance sheets and should be read together with our consolidated financial
statements and the accompanying notes.
Summary of Consolidated Balance Sheets
As of December 31,
Variance
(Dollars in millions)
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents
$ 38,853
$ 35,817
$ 3,036
Restricted cash and cash equivalents
39,958
32,889
7,069
Securities purchased under agreements to resell
15,975
30,700
(14,725)
Investments in securities, at fair value
79,197
53,116
26,081
Mortgage loans:
Of Fannie Mae
50,408
50,325
Of consolidated trusts
4,095,305
4,094,036
1,269
Allowance for loan losses
(7,707)
(8,730)
1,023
Mortgage loans, net of allowance for loan losses
4,138,006
4,135,631
2,375
Deferred tax assets, net
10,545
11,681
(1,136)
Other assets
27,197
25,603
1,594
Total assets
$ 4,349,731
$ 4,325,437
$ 24,294
Liabilities and equity
Debt:
Of Fannie Mae
$ 139,422
$ 124,065
$ 15,357
Of consolidated trusts
4,088,675
4,098,653
(9,978)
Other liabilities
26,977
25,037
1,940
Total liabilities
4,255,074
4,247,755
7,319
Fannie Mae stockholders’ equity:
Senior preferred stock
120,836
120,836
-
Other net deficit
(26,179)
(43,154)
16,975
Total equity
94,657
77,682
16,975
Total liabilities and equity
$ 4,349,731
$ 4,325,437
$ 24,294
Restricted Cash and Cash Equivalents
The increase in restricted cash and cash equivalents from December 31, 2023 to December 31, 2024 was primarily
driven by an increase in prepayments of loans held in consolidated trusts, resulting in higher cash balances held in trust
at period end.
Securities Purchased Under Agreements to Resell and Investments in Securities,
at Fair Value
The primary driver of the increase in investments in securities, at fair value, as well as the decrease in securities
purchased under agreements to resell, from December 31, 2023 to December 31, 2024 , was a shift to investing the
proceeds of funding debt issued during the second half of 2024 in longer-term U.S. Treasury securities, rather than
investing those funds in securities purchased under agreements to resell. See “ Liquidity and Capital Management -
Liquidity Management -Corporate Liquidity Portfolio” for additional information.
Mortgage Loans, Net of Allowance for Loan Losses
The mortgage loans reported in our consolidated balance sheets are classified as either HFS or HFI and include loans
owned by Fannie Mae and loans held in consolidated trusts.
The increase in mortgage loans, net of allowance from December 31, 2023 to December 31, 2024 was primarily driven
by an increase in multifamily loans, as multifamily acquisitions outpaced paydowns and liquidations. In addition, our
allowance for loan losses decreased during the period. The impact of these factors was partially offset by a decrease in
single-family loans.
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
MD&A | Consolidated Balance Sheet Analysis
For additional information on our mortgage loans, see “ Note 4, Mortgage Loans ,” and for additional information on
changes in our allowance for loan losses, see “ Note 5, Allowance for Loan Losses .”
Debt
Debt of consolidated trusts represents the amount of Fannie Mae MBS issued from consolidated trusts and held by
third-party certificateholders. Debt of Fannie Mae also includes CAS debt, which we issued in connection with our
transfer of mortgage credit risk.
The increase in debt of Fannie Mae from December 31, 2023 to December 31, 2024 was primarily due to the issuance
of additional long-term deb t in 2024 . The decrease in debt of consolidated trusts from December 31, 2023 to December
31, 2024 was primarily driven by liquidations of Fannie Mae single-family MBS outpacing issuances and an increase in
MBS securities held in our retained mortgage portfolio. See “ Liquidity and Capital Management - Liquidity Management
- Debt Funding ” for a summary of activity in debt of Fannie Mae and a comparison of the mix between our outstanding
short-term and long-term debt. Also see “ Note 8, Short-Term and Long-Term Debt ” for additional information on our total
outstanding debt.
Stockholders’ Equity
Our stockholders’ equity (also referred to as our net worth) increased to $94.7 billion as of December 31, 2024 ,
compared with $77.7 billion as of December 31, 2023 , due to the $17.0 billion in comprehensive income recognized
during 2024 .
The aggregate liquidation preference of the senior preferred stock increased to $212.0 billion as of December 31, 2024
from $195.2 billion as of December 31, 2023 . The aggregate liquidation preference of the senior preferred stock will
further increase to $216.1 billion as of March 31, 2025 , due to the $4.1 billion increase in our net worth in the fourth
quarter of 2024 . For more information about how this liquidation preference is determined, see “ Business -
Conservatorship and Treasury Agreements - Treasury Agreements - Senior Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement and
Senior Preferred Stock .”
Retained Mortgage Portfolio
Our retained mortgage portfolio consists of mortgage loans and mortgage-related securities that we own, including
Fannie Mae MBS and non-Fannie Mae mortgage-related securities. Assets held by consolidated MBS trusts that back
mortgage-related securities owned by third parties are not included in our retained mortgage portfolio.
We use our retained mortgage portfolio primarily to provide liquidity to the mortgage market through portfolio
securitization transactions and to support our loss mitigation activities.
We classify our retained mortgage portfolio into three categories:
• Lender liquidity includes balances related to our portfolio securitization activity, which supports our efforts to
provide liquidity to the single-family and multifamily mortgage markets.
• Loss mitigation includes delinquent mortgage loans we purchase from our MBS trusts, which enables us to
initiate certain loss mitigation efforts.
• Other represents assets that we previously purchased for investment purposes.
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
MD&A | Retained Mortgage Portfolio
The table below displays the components of our retained mortgage portfolio. Based on the nature of the asset, these
balances are included in either “ Investments in securities, at fair value ” or “ Mortgage loans, net of allowance for loan
losses ” in our “Summary of Consolidated Balance Sheets” table above.
The increase in our retained mortgage portfolio as of December 31, 2024 compared with December 31, 2023 was
primarily due to an increase in our lender liquidity portfolio driven by higher holdings in agency securities. This was
partially offset by the continued decline in loans and securities in the other category primarily due to liquidations and
paydowns.
Retained Mortgage Portfolio
As of December 31,
(Dollars in millions)
Lender liquidity:
Agency securities (1)
$ 40,550
$ 27,823
Mortgage loans
8,093
7,101
Total lender liquidity
48,643
34,924
Loss mitigation mortgage loans (2)
40,194
38,634
Other:
Reverse mortgage loans and securities (3)
3,542
5,953
Other mortgage loans and securities (4)
2,502
3,683
Total other
6,044
9,636
Total retained mortgage portfolio
$ 94,881
$ 83,194
Retained mortgage portfolio by segment:
Single-family mortgage loans and mortgage-related securities
$ 89,308
$ 77,357
Multifamily mortgage loans and mortgage-related securities
$ 5,573
$ 5,837
(1) Consists of Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and Ginnie Mae mortgage-related securities, including Freddie Mac securities guaranteed by Fannie
Mae. Excludes Fannie Mae and Ginnie Mae reverse mortgage securities and Fannie Mae-wrapped private-label securities.
(2) Includes single-family loans on nonaccrual status of $10.3 billion and $8.1 billion as of December 31, 2024 and 2023 , respectively. Also
includes multifamily loans on nonaccrual status of $2.9 billion and $2.0 billion as of December 31, 2024 and 2023 , respectively.
(3) Includes Fannie Mae and Ginnie Mae reverse mortgage securities. We stopped acquiring newly originated reverse mortgage loans in
2010.
(4) Other mortgage loans primarily includes multifamily loans on accrual status and single-family loans that are not included in the loss
mitigation or lender liquidity categories. Other mortgage securities primarily includes private-label securities and mortgage revenue bonds.
The amount of mortgage assets that we may own is capped at $225 billion under the terms of our senior preferred stock
purchase agreement with Treasury. In addition, we are currently required to cap our mortgage assets at $202.5 billion
per instructions from FHFA.
We include 10% of the notional value of the interest-only securities we hold in calculating the size of the retained
mortgage portfolio for the purpose of determining compliance with the senior preferred stock purchase agreement
mortgage assets cap and associated FHFA instructions. As of December 31, 2024 , 10% of the notional value of our
interest-only securities was $1.6 billion , which is not included in the table above.
Under the terms of our MBS trust documents, we have the option or, in some instances, the obligation, to purchase
mortgage loans that meet specific criteria from an MBS trust. FHFA has also provided us with instruction on our single-
family delinquent loan buyout policy. The purchase price for these loans is the unpaid principal balance of the loans plus
accrued i nterest. In support of our loss mitigation strategies, we purchased $12.7 billion of loans from our single-family
MBS trusts during 2024 , the substantial majority of which were delinquent , compared with $9.5 billion of loans
purchased from single-family MBS trusts during 2023 .
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
MD&A | Guaranty Book of Business
Guaranty Book of Business
When we securitize mortgage loans originated by lenders into Fannie Mae mortgage-backed securities, we issue
guarantees, taking on the credit risk for those mortgage loans. Our guaranty book of business offers insight into both the
guarantees we’ve issued and the credit risk of the loans we’ve acquired that back our MBS outstanding or that are held
in our retained mortgage portfolio.
Our “guaranty book of business” consists of: (1) Fannie Mae MBS outstanding, excluding the portions of any structured
securities we issue that are backed by Freddie Mac securities, (2) mortgage loans of Fannie Mae held in our retained
mortgage portfolio, and (3) other credit enhancements that we provide on mortgage assets.
We use the term “Fannie Mae MBS” or “our MBS” to refer to any type of mortgage-backed security that we issue,
including Fannie Mae-issued UMBS and structured securities such as Supers ® and Real Estate Mortgage Investment
Conduit securities (“REMICs”).
We and Freddie Mac each issue single-family uniform mortgage-backed securities, or “UMBS ® .” In some instances, our
MBS are resecuritizations of securities backed in whole or in part by Freddie Mac-issued UMBS, in which case our
guaranty extends to the underlying Freddie Mac securities, shown as “Freddie Mac securities guaranteed by Fannie
Mae” in the table below. The Freddie Mac securities guaranteed by Fannie Mae are excluded from our “guaranty book
of business” because Freddie Mac continues to guarantee the payment of principal and interest on the underlying
Freddie Mac securities, but included in “Total Fannie Mae guarantees” as presented in the table below.
The table below displays the composition of our guaranty book of business and our total Fannie Mae guarantees based
on unpaid principal balance.
Composition of Fannie Mae Guaranty Book of Business
As of December 31,
Single-
Family
Multifamily
Total
Single-
Family
Multifamily
Total
(Dollars in millions)
Conventional guaranty book of business (1)
$ 3,632,700
$ 502,080
$ 4,134,780
$ 3,647,344
$ 471,812
$ 4,119,156
Government guaranty book of business (2)
5,705
6,195
7,901
8,421
Guaranty book of business
3,638,405
502,570
4,140,975
3,655,245
472,332
4,127,577
Freddie Mac securities guaranteed by Fannie Mae (3)
200,086
-
200,086
215,605
-
215,605
Total Fannie Mae guarantees
$ 3,838,491
$ 502,570
$ 4,341,061
$ 3,870,850
$ 472,332
$ 4,343,182
(1) Refers to mortgage loans and mortgage-related securities that are not guaranteed or insured, in whole or in part, by the U.S. government.
(2) Refers to mortgage loans and mortgage-related securities guaranteed or insured, in whole or in part, by the U.S. government.
(3) Represents the unpaid principal balance of Freddie Mac-issued UMBS backing Fannie Mae-issued Supers and REMICs. Because we do
not have the power to direct matters (primarily the servicing of mortgage loans) that impact the credit risk to which we are exposed, which
constitute control of these securitization trusts, we do not consolidate these trusts in our consolidated balance sheet, giving rise to off-
balance sheet exposure. See “ Liquidity and Capital Management - Liquidity Management - Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements ” and “ Note 7,
Financial Guarantees ” for information regarding our maximum exposure to loss on unconsolidated Fannie Mae MBS and Freddie Mac
securities.
Presentation of Gua ranty Book of Business in the Single-Family Business and
Multifamily Business sections
We present the guaranty book of business in this section and in our Monthly Summary reports, which are available on
our website, based on the unpaid principal balance of our MBS outstanding. In the “ Single-Family Business ” and
“ Multifamily Business ” sections of this report, we present our single-family conventional guaranty book of business and
our multifamily guaranty book of business, respectively, based on the unpaid principal balance of mortgage loans
underlying our MBS. These amounts differ primarily as a result of payments we receive on underlying loans that have
not yet been paid to the MBS holders or in instances where we have advanced missed borrower payments on mortgage
loans to make required distributions to MBS holders. The d ifference in these measurements is less than 1%. Using
these two presentations allows us to base the disclosure in this section and in our Monthly Summary reports based on
the MBS measurement, and disclosures about the composition of loans in our guaranty book of business based on the
loan measurement.
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
MD&A | Business Segment Financial Results
Business Segment Financial Results
We have two reportable business segments: Single-Family and Multifamily. This section provides a discussion of the
primary components of net income for our Single-Family Business and Multifamily Business segments. This information
complements the discussion of our consolidated financial results in “ Consolidated Results of Operations .”
Single-Family Business Financial Results (1)
For the Year Ended December 31,
Variance
2024 vs. 2023
2023 vs. 2022
(Dollars in millions)
Net interest income (2)
$ 24,130
$ 24,229
$ 24,736
$ (99)
$ (507)
Fee and other income (3)
(19)
Net revenues
24,375
24,434
24,960
(59)
(526)
Benefit (provision) for credit losses
2,165
(5,029)
(1,227)
7,194
Fair value gains (losses), net
1,745
1,231
1,364
(133)
Investment gains (losses), net
(53)
(41)
(223)
(12)
Non-interest expense:
Administrative expenses (4)
(3,000)
(2,858)
(2,677)
(142)
(181)
Legislative assessments (5)
(3,719)
(3,699)
(3,739)
(20)
Credit enhancement expense (6)
(1,349)
(1,281)
(1,062)
(68)
(219)
Change in expected credit enhancement recoveries (7)
(134)
(310)
(780)
Other expenses, net (8)
(683)
(851)
(520)
(331)
Total non-interest expense
(8,885)
(8,999)
(7,528)
(1,471)
Income before federal income taxes
18,120
18,790
13,544
(670)
5,246
Provision for federal income taxes
(3,690)
(3,935)
(2,774)
(1,161)
Net income
$ 14,430
$ 14,855
$ 10,770
$ (425)
$ 4,085
Multifamily Business Financial Results (1)
For the Year Ended December 31,
Variance
2024 vs. 2023
2023 vs. 2022
(Dollars in millions)
Net interest income
$ 4,618
$ 4,544
$ 4,687
$ 74
$ (143)
Fee and other income (3)
(18)
Net revenues
4,694
4,614
4,775
(161)
Benefit (provision) for credit losses
(752)
(495)
(1,248)
(257)
Fair value gains (losses), net
(80)
Investment gains (losses), net
(12)
(74)
Non-interest expense:
Administrative expenses (4)
(619)
(587)
(520)
(32)
(67)
Legislative assessments (5)
(47)
(46)
(49)
(1)
Credit enhancement expense (6)
(292)
(231)
(261)
(61)
Change in expected credit enhancement recoveries (7)
(140)
Other expenses, net (8)
(254)
(267)
(111)
(156)
Total non-interest expense
(884)
(1,014)
(684)
(330)
Income before federal income taxes
3,149
3,166
2,689
(17)
Provision for federal income taxes
(601)
(613)
(536)
(77)
Net income
$ 2,548
$ 2,553
$ 2,153
$ (5)
$ 400
(1) See “ Note 11, Segment Reporting ” for information about our segment allocation methodology.
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
MD&A | Business Segment Financial Results
(2) For single-family, includes net interest income generated by the 10 basis point guaranty fee increase we implemented pursuant to the
Temporary Payroll Tax Cut Continuation Act of 2011, and as extended by the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, which is paid to
Treasury and not retained by us.
(3) Single-family fee and other income consists primarily of compensation for engaging in structured transactions and providing other lender
services. Multifamily fee and other income consists of fees associated with certain Multifamily business activities such as credit
enhancements for tax-exempt multifamily housing revenue bonds.
(4) Consists of (1) salaries and employee benefits, and (2) professional services, technology and occupancy expenses.
(5) For single-family, consists of the portion of our single-family guaranty fees that is paid to Treasury pursuant to the TCCA, affordable
housing allocations and FHFA assessments. For multifamily, consists of the affordable housing allocations and FHFA assessments.
(6) Single-family credit enhancement expense consists of costs associated with our freestanding credit enhancements, which primarily include
our CAS and CIRT programs, EPMI and certain lender risk-sharing programs. Multifamily credit enhancement expense primarily consists
of costs associated with our MCIRT TM and MCAS TM programs as well as amortization expense for certain lender risk-sharing programs.
Excludes CAS transactions accounted for as debt instruments and credit risk transfer programs accounted for as derivative instruments.
(7) Consists of change in benefits recognized from our freestanding credit enhancements, primarily from our CAS and CIRT programs as well
as certain lender risk-sharing arrangements, including our multifamily DUS ® program.
(8) Consists of debt extinguishment gains and losses, expenses associated with legal claims, foreclosed property income (expense), gains
and losses from partnership investments, loan subservicing costs, and servicer fees paid in connection with certain loss mitigation
activitie s.
Net Interest Income
(Dollars in millions)
Single-F amily
The $99 million decrease in net interest income in 2024 compared with 2023 was driven by lower deferred guaranty fee
income, primarily offset by higher income from base guaranty fees and lower expense from hedge accounting.
The $507 million decrease in net interest income in 2023 compared with 2022 was primarily as a result of lower
deferred guaranty fee income and higher expense from hedge accounting largely offset by higher income from
portfolios.
Multifamily
The $74 million increase in net interest income in 2024 compared with 2023 was primarily driven by higher guaranty fee
income as a result of an increase in the size of our multifamily guaranty book of business, partially offset by lower
average charged guaranty fees and lower yield maintenance income from fewer prepayments.
The $143 million decrease in net interest income in 2023 compared with 2022 was primarily due to lower yield
maintenance income as a result of fewer prepayments, as well as lower average charged guaranty fees, partially offset
by an increase in our multifamily guaranty book of business.
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
MD&A | Business Segment Financial Results
Benefit (Provision) for Credit Losses
(Dollars in millions)
See “ Consolidated Results of Operations - Benefit (Provision) for Credit Losses ” for a discussion of our single-family
and multifamily benefit (provision) for credit losses.
Change in Expected Credit Enhancement Recoveries
(Dollars in millions)
See “ Consolidated Results of Operations - Change in Expected Credit Enhancement Recoveries ” for a discussion of
the change in expected credit enhancement recoveries in 2024 as compared with 2023 relating to our multifamily loss
sharing arrangements.
Fair Value Gains (Losses), Net
(Dollars in millions)
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
MD&A | Business Segment Financial Results
Single-F amily
Fair value gains, net in 2024 were driven by gains on risk man agement derivatives , trading securities and mortgage
commitment derivatives. Gains on risk management derivatives and mortgage commitment derivatives were primarily
due to rising interest rates, and the gains on trading securities were primarily driven by holdings of U.S. Treasury
securities moving closer to maturity, which resulted in the reversal of previously recorded fair value losses.
Fair value gains, net in 2023 were primarily driven by gains on trading securities. U.S. Treasury yields decreased in the
fourth quarter of 2023, which resulted in a net gain o n our fixed-rate securities held in our corporate liquidity portfolio.
Multifamily
Fair value gains, net in 2024 were relatively flat compared with 2023 .
Single-Family Business
Single-Family Primary Business Activities
Providing Liquidity for Single-Family Mortgage Loans
Working with lenders, our Single-Family business provides liquidity to the mortgage market primarily by acquiring single-
family loans from lenders and securitizing those loans into Fannie Mae MBS, which are either delivered to the lenders or
sold to investors or dealers. We describe our securitization transactions in “ Business -Mortgage Securitizations.” Our
Single-Family business also supports liquidity in the mortgage market and the businesses of our lenders through other
activities, such as issuing structured Fannie Mae MBS backed by single-family mortgage assets and buying and selling
single-family agency mortgage-backed securities.
Our Single-Family business securitizes and purchases primarily conventional (not government-insured or government-
guaranteed) single-family fixed-rate or adjustable-rate, first-lien mortgage loans, or mortgage-related securities backed
by these types of loans. We also securitize or purchase loans insured by FHA, loans guaranteed by the VA, loans
guaranteed by the Rural Development Housing and Community Facilities Program of the U.S. Department of
Agriculture, manufactured housing mortgage loans and other mortgage-related securities.
Single-Family Mortgage Servicing
Our single-family mortgage loans are serviced by mortgage servicers on our behalf. Some loans are serviced by the
lenders that initially sold the loans to us. In other cases, loans are serviced by third-party servicers that did not originate
or sell the loans to us. For loans we own or guarantee, the lender or servicer must obtain our approval before selling
servicing rights to another servicer.
Our mortgage servicers typically collect and deliver principal and interest payments, administer escrow accounts,
monitor and report on loan performance, perform early delinquency intervention activities, evaluate transfers of
ownership interests, respond to requests for partial releases of security, and h andle insurance proceeds from casualty
and condemnation losses. Our mortgage servicers are the primary point of contact for borrowers and perform a key role
in the effective implementation of our servicing policies, negotiation of workouts for delinquent and troubled loans, and
other loss mitigation activities. Mortgage servicers also inspect and preserve properties and process foreclosures and
bankruptcies. For information on the risks of our reliance on servicers, refer to “ Risk Factors - Credit Risk .”
We compensate servicers primarily by permitting them to retain a specified portion of each interest payment on a
serviced mortgage loan as a servicing fee. Servicers also generally retain assumption fees, late payment charges and
other similar charges, to the extent they are collected from borrowers, as additional servicing compensation. We also
compensate servicers for negotiating workouts on problem loans.
Our servicers are required to develop, follow and maintain written procedures relating to loan servicing and legal
compliance in accordance with our Servicing Guide. We oversee servicer compliance with our Servicing Guide
requirements and execution of our loss mitigation programs by conducting reviews of select servicers. These reviews
are designed to test a servicer’s quality control processes and compliance with our requirements across key servicing
functions. Issues identified through these Servicing Guide compliance reviews are provided to the servicer with
prescribed corrective actions and expected resolution due dates, and we monitor servicers’ remediation of their
compliance issues.
We employ a servicer performance management program, called the Servicer Total Achievement and Rewards TM
(STAR TM ) Program, which provides our largest servicers a transparent framework of key metrics and operational
assessments to recognize strong performance and identify areas of weakness. Performance management staff
measure, monitor and manage overall servicer performance by conducting regular servicer performance reviews in an
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
MD&A | Single-Family Business | Single-Family Primary Business Activities
effort to promote optimal performance, mitigate risk and explore best practices or areas of opportunity to take action and
improve performance where necessary or appropriate.
Repercussions for poor performance by a servicer may include performance improvement plans, lost incentive income,
compensatory fees, monetary and non-monetary remedies, and reduced opportunity for STAR Program recognition. If
poor performance persists, servicing may ultimately be transferred to a different servicer.
Single-Family Credit Risk and Credit Loss Management
Our Single-Family business:
• Prices and manages the credit risk on loans in our single-family guaranty book of business th rough our loan
acquisition policies, including our Selling Guide.
• Enters into transactions that transfer a portion of the credit risk on some of the loans in our single-family
guaranty book of business through our credit risk transfer programs.
• Works to reduce costs of defaulted single-family loans, including through forbearance plans, home retention
solutions, foreclosure alternatives, management of foreclosures and our REO inventory, selling nonperforming
loans, and pursuing contractual remedies from lenders, servicers and providers of credit enhancement.
See “ Single-Family Mortgage Credit Risk Management ” below for discussion of our strategies for managing credit risk
and credit losses on single-family loans .
Single-Family Lenders and Investors
We w ork with lenders that operate within the primary mortgage market where mortgage loans are originated and funds
are loaned to borrowers. Our lenders include mortgage banking companies, savings and loan associations, savings
banks, commercial banks, credit unions, community banks, private mortgage originators, and state and local housing
finance agencies. Lenders originating mortgages in the primary mortgage market often sell them in the secondary
mortgage market in the form of whole loans or in the form of mortgage-related securities.
During 2024 , approximately 1,200 lenders delivered single-family mortgage loans to us. We acquire a significant portion
of our single-family mortgage loans from several large mortgage lenders. During 2024 and 2023 , our top five lenders, in
the aggregate, accounted for 29% of our single-family business volume. No lender accounted for 10% or more of our
single-family business volume in 2024 .
We have a diversified funding base of domestic and international investors. Purchasers of single-family Fannie Mae
MBS include asset managers, commercial banks, pension funds, insurance companies, Treasury, central banks,
corporations, state and local governments, and other municipal authorities. Our CAS investors include asset managers,
real estate investment trusts, hedge funds and insurance companies, while our CIRT transaction counterparties are
insurers and reinsurers.
Single-Family Competition
We compete to acquire single-family mortgage assets in the secondary mortgage market and to issue single-family
mortgage-backed securities to investors. Competition to acquire single-family mortgage assets is significantly affected
by: our and our competitors’ pricing, eligibility standards and risk appetite; the number and nature of single-family
mortgage loans originated and available for us to purchase in the secondary mortgage market (and whether sellers
elect to retain loans with better credit characteristics); investor demand for UMBS and for our and our competitors’ other
mortgage-backed securities; and macroeconomic conditions. Our ability to compete may also be affected by many other
factors, including: our and our competitors’ capital requirements; our and Freddie Mac’s return on capital requirements;
applicable requirements to purchase mission-related loans; FHFA’s single-family mortgage purchase, servicing and
securitization requirements aimed at aligning our single-family MBS with Freddie Mac’s MBS; direction from FHFA; new
or existing legislation or regulations applicable to us, our lenders or our investors; and our senior preferred stock
purchase agreement with Treasury .
Our primary competitors for the acquisition of single-family mortgage assets are Freddie Mac, FHA, the VA, the FHLBs,
U.S. banks and thrifts, securities dealers, insurance companies, and investment funds. Our primary competitors for the
issuance and/or guarantee of single-family mortgage-backed securities are Freddie Mac, Ginnie Mae (which primarily
guarantees securities backed by FHA-insured loans and VA-guaranteed loans) and private market competitors.
Competition for investors and counterparties in our credit risk transfer transactions comes primarily from other issuers of
mortgage credit risk transfer transactions, such as Freddie Mac and private mortgage insurers. We also compete for
investor funds against other credit-related securitized products, such as private-label residential mortgage-backed
securities (“RMBS”), commercial RMBS, and collateralized loan obligations. The nature of our primary competitors and
the overall levels of competition we face could change as a result of a variety of factors, many of which are outside our
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
MD&A | Single-Family Business | Single-Family Competition
control. See “ Business - Conservatorship and Treasury Agreements ,” “ Business - Legislation and Regulation ,” and
“ Risk Factors ” for information on matters that could affect our business and competitive environment.
Single-Family Mortgage Market
In the charts below we present macroeconomic factors that affect the single-family mortgage market in which our
Single-Family business operates. Home sales and the supply of unsold homes are indicators of the underlying demand
for mortgage loans, which impacts our acquisition volumes.
Total Single-Family Home Sales and
Months’ Supply of Unsold Homes (1)
Single-Family Mortgage Originations and
Mortgage Debt Outstanding (2)
(Home sales units in thousands)
(Dollars in trillions)
Months’ supply of new single-family
unsold homes, as of year end
Fannie Mae’s percentage of total single-family mortgage
debt outstanding, as of period end
Months’ supply of existing single-family
unsold homes, as of year end
Single-family U.S. mortgage debt outstanding, as of period
end
Existing home sales
Single-family U.S. mortgage loan originations
New home sales
(1) Total existing home sales data according to National Association of REALTORS ® . New single-family home sales data according to the U.S.
Census Bureau. Certain previously reported data has been updated to reflect revised historical data from one or both of these
organizations.
(2) 2024 information is as of September 30, 2024 and is based on the Federal Reserve’s December 2024 mortgage debt outstanding release,
the latest date for which the Federal Reserve has estimated mortgage debt outstanding for single-family residences. Prior-period amounts
have been changed to reflect revised historical data from the Federal Reserve.
Additional Information
• The average 30-year fixed-rate mortgage rate was 6.85% as of December 26, 2024 compared with 6.61% as of
December 28, 2023 , and averaged 6.72% in 2024 , compared with 6.81% in 2023 , according to Freddie Mac’s
Primary Mortgage Market Survey ® .
• We forecast that total originations in the U.S. single-family mortgage market in 2025 will increase from 2024
levels by approximately 13% , from an estimated $1.69 trillion in 2024 to $1.92 trillion in 2025 , and the amount
of refinance originations in the U.S. single-family mortgage market will increase from an estimated $387 billion
in 2024 to $496 billion in 2025 . See “ Key Market Economic Indicators ” for additional discussion of how housing
activity can affect our financial results and the uncertainties that may affect our forecasts and expectations.
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
MD&A | Single-Family Business | Single-Family Mortgage-Related Securities Issuances Share
Single-Family Mortgage-Related Securities Issuances Share
Our single-family Fannie Mae MBS issuances were $329 billion in 2024 , compared with $320 billion in 2023 and $628
billion in 2022 . This slight increase in issuances compared with 2023 was driven by a modest uptick in refinancing
activity in 2024 , prompted by a decline in interest rates during the third quarter of 2024 . Based on the latest data
available, the charts below display our estimated share of single-family mortgage-related securities issuances as
compared with that of our primary competitors for the issuance of single-family mortgage-related securities for the
periods indicated .
Single-Family Mortgage-Related
Securities Issuances Share
Ginnie Mae
Private-label securities
Fannie Mae
Freddie Mac
We estimate our share of single-family mortgage-related securities issuances was 35% in 2022 .
Our market share is influenced by various factors, including the pricing of single-family loans and the competitive market
environment. When making pricing and acquisition decisions for single-family loans, we must consider a mix of often
competing factors, such as competitive market dynamics, our capital requirements, our housing mission requirements
and UMBS market liquidity objectives . Balancing these considerations can sometimes create challenges that impact our
ability to compete effectively in the marketplace . For a discussion of factors that affect or could affect our business, our
competitive environment, demand for our MBS, or the liquidity and market value of our MBS, as well as the risks
associated with our conservatorship, our higher capital requirements relative to that of our primary competitor, our
housing mission requirements, the UMBS market and the performance of our MBS, see “ Business - Conservatorship
and Treasury Agreements ,” “ Business - Legislation and Regulation ,” “ Risk Factors ” and “ Single-Family Competition . ”
Single-Family Business Metrics
Net interest income for our Single-Family business is driven by the guaranty fees we charge and the size of our single-
family conventional guaranty book of business. The guaranty fees we charge are based on the characteristics of the
loans we acquire. We may adjust our guaranty fees in light of market conditions and to achieve return targets. As a
result, the average charged guaranty fee on new acquisitions may fluctuate based on the credit quality and product mix
of loans acquired, as well as market conditions and other factors.
The charts below display our average charged guaranty fees, net of TCCA fees, on our single-family conventional
guaranty book of business and on new single-family conventional loan acquisitions, along with our average single-family
conventional guaranty book of business and our single-family conventional loan acquisitions for the periods presented.
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
MD&A | Single-Family Business | Single-Family Business Metrics
Select Single-Family Business Metrics (1)
(Dollars in billions)
Average charged guaranty fee on single-family
conventional guaranty book of business, net of TCCA
fees (2)
Average single-family conventional guaranty book
of business (3)
Average charged guaranty fee on new single-family
conventional acquisitions, net of TCCA fees (2)
Single-family conventional acquisitions
(1) As measured for purposes of the information reported in this section, our single-family conventional guaranty book of business was
$3,617.3 billion as of December 31, 2024 , $3,636.7 billion as of December 31, 2023 and $3,635.2 billion as of December 31, 2022 .
(2) Excludes the impact of a 10 basis point guaranty fee increase implemented pursuant to the TCCA, the incremental revenue from which is
paid to Treasury and not retained by us.
(3) Our single-family conventional guaranty book of business primarily consists of single-family conventional mortgage loans underlying
Fannie Mae MBS outstanding. It also includes single-family conventional mortgage loans of Fannie Mae held in our retained mortgage
portfolio, and other credit enhancements that we provide on single-family conventional mortgage assets. Our single-family conventional
guaranty book of business does not include: (a) mortgage loans guaranteed or insured, in whole or in part, by the U.S. government; (b)
Freddie Mac-acquired mortgage loans underlying Freddie Mac-issued UMBS that we have resecuritized; or (c) non-Fannie Mae single-
family mortgage-related securities held in our retained mortgage portfolio for which we do not provide a guaranty. Our average single-
family conventional guaranty book of business is based on quarter-end balances.
Our single-family conventional loan acquisition volumes remained at low levels in 2024 . While interest rates decreased
during the third quarter of 2024 , the average 30-year fixed-rate mortgage rate during the year still remained higher than
the interest rates of most outstanding single-family loans, resulting in low refinance volumes. In addition, housing
affordability constraints and limited supply continued to put downward pressure on the volume of purchase loans we
acquired.
Average charged guaranty fee on newly acquired conventional single-family loans is a metric management uses to
measure the amount we earn as compensation for the credit risk we manage and to assess our return. Average
charged guaranty fee represents, on an annualized basis, the average of the base guaranty fees charged during the
period for our single-family conventional guaranty arrangements, which we receive monthly over the life of the loan, plus
the recognition of any upfront cash payments, including loan-level price adjustments, based on an estimated average
life at the time of acquisition. The calculation of single-family conventional charged guaranty fees at acquisition is
sensitive to changes in inputs used in the calculation, including assumptions about the weighted average life of the loan,
therefore changes in charged guaranty fees are not necessarily indicative of a change in pricing.
Our average charged guaranty fee on newly acquired conventional single-family loans, net of TCCA fees, increased in
2024 compared with 2023 and 2022 , primarily as a result of higher base guaranty fees charged on new acquisitions.
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
MD&A | Single-Family Business | Single-Family Mortgage Credit Risk Management
Single-Family Mortgage Credit Risk Management
Our strategy for managing single-family mortgage credit risk consists of four primary components, which we discuss in
greater detail in the sections below:
• our acquisition and servicing policies along with our underwriting and servicing standards;
• guaranty book diversification and monitoring;
• the transfer of credit risk through risk transfer transactions and the use of credit enhancements; and
• management of problem loans.
We typically obtain our single-family credit information from the lenders or servicers of the mortgage loans in our
guaranty book of business and receive representations and warranties from them as to the accuracy of the information.
While we perform various quality assurance checks by sampling loans to assess compliance with our underwriting and
eligibility criteria, we do not independently verify all reported information and we rely on lender representations and
warranties regarding the accuracy of the characteristics of loans in our guaranty book of business. See “ Risk Factors ”
for a discussion of risks relating to mortgage fraud as a result of this reliance on lender representations and warranties.
Single-Family Acquisition and Servicing Policies and Underwriting and Servicing
Standards
Overview
Our Single-Family business is responsible for setting underwriting and servicing standards and pricing, and managing
credit risk relating to our single-family guaranty book of business.
Underwriting and Servicing Standards
The Fannie Mae Single-Family Selling Guide (“Selling Guide”) sets forth our underwriting and eligibility guidelines, as
well as our policies and procedures related to selling single-family mortgages to us. Our Servicing Guide sets forth our
policies for servicing the loans in our single-family guaranty book.
Desktop Underwriter
Our proprietary automated underwriting system, Desktop Underwriter ® (DU ® ), is used by mortgage lenders to evaluate
the substantial majority of our single-family loan acquisitions. DU measures credit risk by assessing the primary and
contributory risk factors of a mortgage and provides a comprehensive risk assessment of a borrower’s loan application
and eligibility of the loan for sale to us. Risk factors evaluated by DU include the key loan attributes described under
“ Single-Family Guaranty Book Diversification and Monitoring ” below. DU applies our own assessment of the borrower’s
credit data, including using trended credit data when available. DU analyzes the results of this risk and eligibility
evaluation to arrive at the underwriting recommendation for the loan casefile . As part of our comprehensive risk
management approach, we periodically update DU to reflect changes to our underwriting and eligibility guidelines. As
part of normal business operations, we regularly review DU to determine whether its risk analysis and eligibility
assessment are appropriate based on the current market environment and loan performance information. We also
regularly review DU’s underlying risk assessment models and recalibrate these models to improve DU’s ability to
effectively analyze risk and avoid excessive risk layering. Factors we take into account in these evaluations include the
profile of loans delivered to us, loan performance and current market conditions.
Consistent with this risk management approach, in March 2024, we implemented updates to DU to allow lenders to use
a single 12-month asset verification report in the DU validation service to identify recurring deposits in the applicant’s
digital bank statement data to automatically validate income and employment, as well as assets, in one step. The same
report also can be used to identify and consider the applicant’s positive rent payment and cash flow history.
In January 2025, we implemented updates to DU that included: updates to the DU risk assessment and risk factors
evaluated by DU; and enhancements in support of increasing access to credit for potential borrowers su c h as those with
limited or no credit histories or borrowers that could benefit from DU’s positive rent payment history and cash flow
assessment capabilities. We will continue to closely monitor loan acquisitions and market conditions and, as
appropriate, make changes to DU, including its eligibility criteria, so that the loans we acquire are consistent with our
risk appetite and mission.
Other Underwriting Standards
DU was used to evaluate approximately 90% of the single-family loans we acquired in 2024 . We also purchase and
securitize mortgage loans that have been underwritten using other automated underwriting systems, as well as
manually underwritten mortgage loans that meet our stated underwriting requirements or meet agreed-upon standards
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
MD&A | Single-Family Business | Single-Family Mortgage Credit Risk Management
that differ from our standard underwriting and eligibility criteria. The majority of loans we acquired in 2024 that were not
underwritten with DU were underwritten through a third-party automated underwriting system, such as Freddie Mac’s
Loan Product Advisor ® .
Servicing Policies
Our servicing policies establish the requirements our servicers must follow in:
• processing and remitting loan payments;
• working with delinquent borrowers on loss mitigation activities;
• managing and protecting Fannie Mae’s interest in the pledged property; and
• processing bankruptcies and foreclosures.
Our goal is to ensure that our policies support credit risk management over the life of the mortgage loan by enabling
early delinquency outreach by servicers, promoting loss mitigation in the event of default and providing for the
preservation and protection of the collateral supporting the mortgage loan. See “ Single-Family Primary Business
Activities - Single-Family Mortgage Servicing ” above for more information on the servicing of our single-family mortgage
loans.
New Credit Score Models and Change to Credit Report Requirement
Fannie Mae uses credit scores to establish a minimum credit threshold for mortgage lending, provide a foundation for
risk-based pricing, and support disclosures to investors. We currently use the “classic FICO ® Score” from Fair Isaac
Corporation as our credit score model, which FHFA has approved.
In October 2022, FHFA announced the validation and approval of two new credit score models for use by Fannie Mae
and Freddie Mac: the FICO ® Score 10 T credit score model and the VantageScore 4.0 credit score model. Once
implemented, lenders will be required to deliver both FICO Score 10 T and VantageScore 4.0 credit scores with each
loan sold to us when available, replacing the classic FICO Score model.
FHFA also announced in October 2022 that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac will work toward changing the requirement
that lenders provide credit reports from all three nationwide consumer reporting agencies. Instead, we will require
lenders to provide credit reports from at least two of the three nationwide consumer reporting agencies (referred to as
the new bi-merge credit reporting requirements).
In response to industry feedback and to better support market participants with this transition, in January 2025, FHFA,
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac revised the implementation date for these requirements from the fourth quarter of 2025 to
a to-be-determined date.
Quality Control Process
Our quality control process includes using automated tools to help us determine whether a loan meets our underwriting
and eligibility guidelines, performing in-depth reviews, and selecting random samples of performing loans for quality
control review shortly after delivery.
Repurchase Requests and Representation and Warranty Framework
If we determine that a mortgage loan did not meet our Selling Guide requirements, then our mortgage sellers and/or
servicers are obligated to repurchase the loan, reimburse us for our losses or provide other remedies, unless the loan is
eligible for relief under our representation and warranty framework. We refer to our demands that mortgage sellers and
servicers meet these obligations as repurchase requests.
Under our representation and warranty framework, lenders can obtain relief from repurchase liability for violations of
certain underwriting representations and warranties. Loans with 36 months of consecutive monthly payments and
minimal delinquencies over a specified time period or with satisfactory conclusion of a full-file quality control review are
eligible for relief. However, no relief may be granted for violations of “life of loan” representations and warranties, such
as those relating to whether a loan was originated in compliance with applicable laws or conforms to our charter
requirements. As of December 31, 2024 , 73% of the outstanding loans in our single-family conventional guaranty book
of business that were acquired and are subject to this framework have obtained relief based solely on payment history
or the satisfactory conclusion of a full-file quality control review, and an additional 25% remain eligible for relief in the
future.
In addition, lenders may obtain relief from liability for violations of a more narrow set of representations and warranties
through the use of specified underwriting tools. This primarily includes relief for:
• borrower income, asset and employment data that has been validated through DU; and
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
MD&A | Single-Family Business | Single-Family Mortgage Credit Risk Management
• appraised property value for appraisals that have received a qualifying risk score in Collateral Underwriter ® , our
appraisal review tool.
The table below shows information about issued and outstanding repurchase requests on single-family loans.
Issued and Outstanding Repurchase Requests
(Dollars in billions)
Total loans delivered for the applicable twelve-month period (1)
$ 307.4
$ 407.5
Repurchase requests issued as of year end on loans delivered during the applicable
twelve-month period (2)
0.43 %
0.57 %
As of December 31,
(Dollars in millions)
Outstanding Repurchase Requests:
Unpaid principal balance of outstanding repurchase requests (3)
$ 220
$ 437
As a percentage of our single-family conventional guaranty book of business
0.01 %
0.01 %
Percentage of outstanding repurchase requests over 180 days outstanding
3 %
3 %
(1) The applicable twelve-month period for 2024 is May 1, 2023 through April 30, 2024 and for 2023 is May 1, 2022 through April 30, 2023. For
2024 , this represents the most recent twelve-month period as of December 31, 2024 for which we have issued substantially all repurchase
demands. The 2023 period is presented on the same basis for comparability with the 2024 period.
(2) Represents repurchase requests issued as of December 31, 2024 and 2023 , on loans delivered to us during the applicable twelve-month
periods referenced in the prior footnote.
(3) The dollar amounts of our outstanding repurchase requests are based on the unpaid principal balance of the loans underlying the
repurchase request, which often differs from the amount collected or reimbursed from mortgage sellers and/or servicers depending on the
type of remedy agreed upon.
Single-Family Guaranty Book Diversification and Monitoring
Overview
The composition of our single-family conventional guaranty book of business is diversified by product type, loan
characteristics and geography, all of which influence credit quality and performance and may reduce our credit risk. We
monitor various loan attributes, in conjunction with housing market and economic conditions, to determine if our pricing,
eligibility and underwriting criteria are appropriately calibrated to ensure the risk associated with loans we acquire fits
within our corporate risk appetite and meets our other mission and return objectives. In some cases, we may decide to
significantly reduce our participation in riskier loan product categories. We also review the payment performance of
loans in order to help identify potential problem loans early in the delinquency cycle and to guide the development of our
loss mitigation strategies.
The profile of our single-family conventional guaranty book of business includes the following key risk characteristics:
• LTV ratio. L TV ratio is a strong predictor of credit performance. Lower LTV ratios are generally associated with
a reduced likelihood of default and lower loss severity in the event of default. This relationship also applies to
estimated mark-to-market LTV ratios. An LTV ratio above 100% indicates that the borrower's mortgage balance
is greater than the property's current market value, which increases the risk of default and potential loss
severity.
• Product type. Certain loan product types have features that may result in increased risk. Generally,
intermediate-term, fixed-rate mortgages exhibit the lowest default rates, followed by long-term, fixed-rate
mortgages. Historically, adjustable-rate mortgages (“ARMs”), including negative-amortizing and interest-only
loans, and balloon/reset mortgages have exhibited higher default rates than fixed-rate mortgages, partly
because the borrower’s payments rose, within limits, as interest rates changed.
• Number of units. Mortgages on one-unit properties tend to have lower credit risk than mortgages on two-, three-
or four-unit properties.
• Property type. Certain property types have a higher risk of default. For example, condominiums tend to have
higher credit risk than single-family detached properties.
• Occupancy type. Mortgages on properties occupied by the borrower as a primary or secondary residence tend
to have lower credit risk than mortgages on investment properties.
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
MD&A | Single-Family Business | Single-Family Mortgage Credit Risk Management
• Credit score. Credit score is a measure often used by the financial services industry, including us, to assess
borrower credit quality and the likelihood that a borrower will repay future obligations as expected. A higher
credit score typically indicates lower credit risk.
• DTI ratio. DTI ratio refers to the ratio of a borrower’s outstanding debt obligations (including both mortgage debt
and certain other long-term and significant short-term debts) to that borrower’s reported or calculated monthly
income, to the extent the income is used to qualify for the mortgage. As a borrower’s DTI ratio increases, the
associated risk of default on the loan generally increases, especially if other higher-risk factors are present.
From time to time, we revise our guidelines for determining a borrower’s DTI ratio. The amount of income
reported by a borrower and used to qualify for a mortgage may not represent the borrower’s total income;
therefore, the DTI ratios we report may be higher than borrowers’ actual DTI ratios.
• Loan purpose. Loan purpose refers to how the borrower intends to use the funds from a mortgage loan-either
for a home purchase or refinancing of an existing mortgage. Cash-out refinancings have a higher risk of default
than either mortgage loans used for the purchase of a property or other refinancings that restrict the amount of
cash returned to the borrower.
• Geographic concentration. Local economic conditions affect borrowers’ ability to repay loans and the value of
collateral underlying loans. Geographic diversification reduces mortgage credit risk.
• Loan age. We monitor year of origination and loan age, which is defined as the number of years since
origination. The risk of default on mortgage loans typically does not peak until the third through fifth year
following origination; however, this range can vary based on many factors, including changes in
macroeconomic conditions and foreclosure timelines.
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
MD&A | Single-Family Business | Single-Family Mortgage Credit Risk Management
The following table displays our single-family conventional business volumes and our single-family conventional
guaranty book of business, based on certain key risk characteristics that we use to evaluate the risk profile and credit
quality of our single-family loans.
We provide additional information on the credit characteristics of our single-family loans in quarterly financial
supplements, which we furnish to the SEC with current reports on Form 8-K and make available on our website.
Information in our quarterly financial supplements is not incorporated by reference into this report.
Key Risk Characteristics of Single-Family Conventional Business Volume and Guaranty Book
of Business (1)
Percent of Single-Family Conventional
Business Volume at Acquisition (2)
For the Year Ended December 31,
Percent of Single-Family Conventional
Guaranty Book of Business (3)
As of December 31,
Original LTV ratio: (4)
<= 60%
%
%
%
%
%
%
60.01% to 70%
70.01% to 80%
80.01% to 90%
90.01% to 95%
95.01% to 100%
Greater than 100%
-
-
-
Total
%
%
%
%
%
%
Weighted average
%
%
%
%
%
%
Average loan amount
$ 331,950
$ 321,205
$ 301,887
$ 209,326
$ 207,883
$ 206,049
Loan count (in thousands)
2,037
17,281
17,494
17,643
Estimated mark-to-market LTV
ratio: (5)
<= 60%
%
%
%
60.01% to 70%
70.01% to 80%
80.01% to 90%
90.01% to 100%
Greater than 100%
*
*
*
Total
%
%
%
Weighted average
%
%
%
FICO credit score at origination: (6)
< 620
*
%
*
%
*
%
*
%
*
%
%
620 to < 660
660 to < 680
680 to < 700
700 to < 740
>= 740
Total
%
%
%
%
%
%
Weighted average
DTI ratio at origination: (7)
<= 43%
%
%
%
%
%
%
43.01% to 45%
Greater than 45%
Total
%
%
%
%
%
%
Weighted average
%
%
%
%
%
%
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
MD&A | Single-Family Business | Single-Family Mortgage Credit Risk Management
Percent of Single-Family Conventional
Business Volume at Acquisition (2)
For the Year Ended December 31,
Percent of Single-Family Conventional
Guaranty Book of Business (3)
As of December 31,
Product type:
Fixed-rate: (8)
Long-term
%
%
%
%
%
%
Intermediate-term
Total fixed-rate
Adjustable-rate
Total
%
%
%
%
%
%
Number of property units:
1 unit
%
%
%
%
%
%
2-4 units
Total
%
%
%
%
%
%
Property type:
Single-family homes
%
%
%
%
%
%
Condo/Co-op
Total
%
%
%
%
%
%
Occupancy type:
Primary residence
%
%
%
%
%
%
Second/vacation home
Investor
Total
%
%
%
%
%
%
Loan purpose:
Purchase
%
%
%
%
%
%
Cash-out refinance
Other refinance
Total
%
%
%
%
%
%
Geographic concentration: (9)
Midwest
%
%
%
%
%
%
Northeast
Southeast
Southwest
West
Total
%
%
%
%
%
%
Origination year:
2018 and prior
%
%
%
-
-
-
Total
%
%
%
* Represents less than 0.5% of single-family conventional business volume or guaranty book of business.
(1) Second-lien mortgage loans held by third parties are not reflected in the original LTV or the estimated mark-to-market LTV ratios in this
table.
(2) Calculated based on the unpaid principal balance of single-family loans for each category at time of acquisition.
(3) Calculated based on the aggregate unpaid principal balance of single-family loans for each category divided by the aggregate unpaid
principal balance of loans in our single-family conventional guaranty book of business as of the end of each period.
(4) The original LTV ratio generally is based on the original unpaid principal balance of the loan divided by the appraised property value
reported to us at the time of acquisition of the loan. Excludes loans for which this information is not readily available.
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
MD&A | Single-Family Business | Single-Family Mortgage Credit Risk Management
(5) The aggregate estimated mark-to-market LTV ratio is based on the unpaid principal balance of the loan as of the end of each reported
period divided by the estimated current value of the property, which we calculate using an internal valuation model that estimates periodic
changes in home value. Excludes loans for which this information is not readily available.
(6) Loans with unavailable FICO credit scores represent less than 0.5% of single-family conventional business volume or guaranty book of
business, and therefore are not presented separately in this table.
(7) Excludes loans for which this information is not readily available.
(8) Long-term fixed-rate consists of mortgage loans with maturities greater than 15 years, while intermediate-term fixed-rate loans have
maturities equal to or less than 15 years.
(9) Midwest consists of IL, IN, IA, MI, MN, NE, ND, OH, SD and WI. Northeast consists of CT, DE, ME, MA, NH, NJ, NY, PA, PR, RI, VT and
VI. Southeast consists of AL, DC, FL, GA, KY, MD, MS, NC, SC, TN, VA and WV. Southwest consists of AZ, AR, CO, KS, LA, MO, NM, OK,
TX and UT. West consists of AK, CA, GU, HI, ID, MT, NV, OR, WA and WY.
Characteristics of our New Single-Family Loan Acquisitions
Refinancing activity was slightly higher in 2024 compared to 2023 as interest rates declined in the third quarter of 2024 ,
resulting in a modest increase in the number of borrowers who could benefit from refinancing. Accordingly, the share of
our single-family loan acquisitions consisting of refinance loans (versus home purchase loans) increased to 17% in
2024 compared with 14% in 2023 . Typically, refinance loans have lower LTV ratios than home purchase loans. This
trend contributed to a minor decrease in the percentage of our single-family loan acquisitions with LTV ratios over 80%,
from 40% in 2023 to 39% in 2024 . In addition, our acquisitions of loans from first-time home buyers remained flat at
41% of our single-family loan acquisitions in 2024 compared to 2023 .
The credit profile of our future acquisitions will depend on many factors, including:
• our future guaranty fee pricing and our competitors’ pricing, and any impact of that pricing on the volume and
mix of loans we acquire;
• our internal risk limits;
• our future eligibility standards and those of mortgage insurers, FHA and VA;
• the percentage of loan originations representing refinancings;
• changes in interest rates;
• our future objectives and activities in support of those objectives, including actions we may take to reach
additional underserved creditworthy borrowers;
• government and regulatory policy;
• market and competitive conditions; and
• our capital requirements.
We expect the ultimate performance of our loans will be affected by borrower behavior, public policy and
macroeconomic trends, including unemployment, the economy and home prices.
High-Balance Loans
The standard conforming loan limit for a one-unit property was $ 726,200 for 2023 , $ 766,550 for 2024 and increased to
$ 806,500 for 2025 . As we discuss in “ Business - Legislation and Regulation -Our Charter,” we are permitted to acquire
loans with higher balances in certain areas, which we refer to as high-balance loans.
The following table displays the amount of high-balance loans in our single-family conventional guaranty book of
business.
Single-Family High-Balance Loans
As of December 31,
Unpaid principal balance (in billions)
$ 225.9
$ 233.3
Percentage of single-family conventional guaranty book of business
%
%
Adjustable-Rate Mortgages
ARMs are mortgage loans with an interest rate that adjusts periodically over the life of the mortgage based on changes
in a specified index. The table below displays the unpaid principal balance for ARMs in our single-family conventional
guaranty book of business by the year of their next scheduled contractual reset date. The contractual reset is either an
adjustment to the loan’s interest rate or a scheduled change to the loan’s monthly payment to begin to reflect the
payment of principal. The timing of the actual reset dates may differ from those presented due to a number of factors,
including refinancing or exercising of other provisions within the terms of the mortgage.
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
MD&A | Single-Family Business | Single-Family Mortgage Credit Risk Management
Single-Family Adjustable-Rate Mortgages (1)
Reset Year
Thereafter
Total
(Dollars in millions)
ARMs (2)
$ 9,760
$ 1,260
$ 2,328
$ 3,139
$ 3,369
$ 7,787
$ 27,643
(1) Excludes loans for which there is not an additional reset for the remaining life of the loan.
(2) Includes $2.3 billion of interest-only and negative-amortizing loans. We have not acquired interest-only loans since 2014, and we have not
acquired negative-amortizing loans since 2007.
Single-Family Credit Enhancement and Transfer of Mortgage Credit Risk
Overview
One of the key components of our credit risk management strategy is the transfer of mortgage credit risk to third parties.
The table below displays information about the loans in our single-family conventional guaranty book of business
covered by one or more forms of credit enhancement, including mortgage insurance or a credit risk transfer transaction.
Single-Family Loans with Credit Enhancement
As of December 31,
Unpaid
Principal
Balance
Percentage of
Single-Family
Conventional
Guaranty Book
of Business
Unpaid
Principal
Balance
Percentage of
Single-Family
Conventional
Guaranty Book
of Business
(Dollars in billions)
Primary mortgage insurance
$ 761
21 %
$ 763
21 %
Connecticut Avenue Securities
Credit Insurance Risk Transfer
Other
Less: Loans covered by multiple credit enhancements
(408)
(11)
(411)
(12)
Total single-family loans with credit enhancement
$ 1,667
46 %
$ 1,646
45 %
The table above presents the unpaid principal balance and percentage of our single-family conventional guaranty book
of business that is covered by the referenced credit enhancements, but does not present the risk in force of such credit
enhancements. “Risk in force” refers to the maximum potential loss recovery under the applicable credit enhancement
transaction. The risk in force of our back-end credit risk transfer transactions, which refers to the maximum amount of
losses that could be absorbed by credit risk transfer investors, was approximately $43 billion as of December 31, 2024 ,
compared with approximately $42 billion as of December 31, 2023 . Our back-end credit risk transfer transactions
consist of our Connecticut Avenue Securities, Credit Insurance Risk Transfer, and o ther transactions. For information on
our risk-in-force primary mortgage insurance coverage, see “ Risk Management - Institutional Counterparty Credit Risk
Management - Mortgage Insurers .”
Mortgage Insurance
Our charter generally requires credit enhancement on any single-family conventional mortgage loan that we purchase or
securitize if it has an LTV ratio over 80% at the time of acquisition. We generally achieve this through primary mortgage
insurance. Primary mortgage insurance transfers varying portions of the credit risk associated with a mortgage loan to a
third-party insurer. For us to receive a payment in settlement of a claim under a primary mortgage insurance policy, the
insured loan must be in default and the borrower’s interest in the property securing the loan must have been
extinguished, generally in a foreclosure action, short sale or a deed-in-lieu of foreclosure. Claims are generally paid
three to six months after title to the property has been transferred.
Our approved monoline mortgage insurers’ financial ability and willingness to pay claims is an important determinant of
our overall credit risk exposure. For a discussion of our exposure to and management of the counterparty credit risk
associated with mortgage insurers, see “ Risk Management - Institutional Counterparty Credit Risk Management -
Mortgage Insurers ” and “ Note 14, Concentrations of Credit Risk .”
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
MD&A | Single-Family Business | Single-Family Mortgage Credit Risk Management
Credit Risk Transfer Transactions
Our Single-Family business has developed other risk-sharing capabilities to transfer portions of our single-family
mortgage credit risk to the private market. These credit risk transfer transactions are described in the table below. Our
credit risk transfer transactions are designed to transfer a portion of the losses we expect would be incurred in an
economic downturn or a stressed credit environment. While these transactions are expected to mitigate some of our
potential future credit losses (generally net of any proceeds received from front-end credit enhancements, such as
primary mortgage insurance ), they are not designed to shield us from all losses. We retain a portion of the future credit
losses on all loans covered by CAS and CIRT transactions, including all or a portion of the first loss positions in most
transactions . Because our credit risk transfer transactions reduce our credit risk, they also affect our capital
requirements and our returns on capital.
We have designed our credit risk transfer transactions so that the principal payment and loss performance of the
transactions correspond to the performance of the loans in the underlying reference pools. Generally, loss
reimbursement payments are received after the underlying property has been liquidated and all applicable proceeds,
including private mortgage insurance benefits, have been applied to reduce the loss.
In 2024 , we transferred a portion of the mortgage credit risk on single-family mortgage loans with an unpaid principal
balance of $186.3 billion at the time of the transactions. When engaging in these transactions, we consider their cost,
the resulting capital relief provided by the transactions, and the overall credit risk transfer capacity of the market. The
cost of our credit risk transfer transactions is impacted by macroeconomic and housing market sentiment, as well as the
demand and capacity of the investors and reinsurers that support these transactions. When structuring our credit risk
transfer transactions, we may choose to adjust the amount of first loss retained by Fannie Mae in these transactions as
a way to manage costs or market capacity, or as a way to adjust the amount of capital relief we are targeting for the
transaction. Changes in our capital requirements, including the capital relief assigned for credit risk transfer
transactions, could cause us to modify our credit risk transfer activities.
We provide a portion of the guaranty fee to investors in our credit risk transfer transactions as compensation for their
taking on a share of the credit risk of the related loans. We record the substantial majority of expenses related to our
credit risk transfer transactions in “Credit enhancement expense” within our consolidated statements of operations and
comprehensive income.
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
MD&A | Single-Family Business | Single-Family Mortgage Credit Risk Management
Principal Categories of Our Single-Family Credit Risk Transfer Transactions
Transaction Description
Other Key Characteristics
CAS
REMIC ®
• We transfer to investors a portion of the mortgage
credit risk associated with losses on a reference
pool of mortgage loans.
• We create a reference pool consisting of recently
acquired single-family mortgage loans included in
our guaranty book of business and create a
hypothetical securitization structure with notional
credit risk positions, or tranches (that is, first loss,
mezzanine and senior).
• We recognize the cost of credit protection in
“Credit enhancement expense” in our
consolidated statements of operations and
comprehensive income.
• We recognize the expected benefits from the
credit protection in “Change in expected credit
enhancement recoveries” in our consolidated
statements of operations and comprehensive
income.
• CAS REMIC transactions align the timing of our
recognition of credit losses with the related
recovery from the CAS REMIC. We record the
expected benefit and the loss in the same period.
• The principal balance of the CAS REMIC decreases
as a result of credit losses on loans in the related
reference pool. These write downs of the principal
balance reduce the total amount of payments that the
CAS trust is obligated to make to investors.
• Credit losses on the loans in the reference pool for a
CAS transaction are first applied to the first loss
tranche. If credit losses on these loans exceed the
outstanding principal balance of the first loss tranche,
losses are then applied to reduce the outstanding
principal balance of the mezzanine loss tranche.
• Transactions beginning with our October 2021
issuances were issued with a 20-year final maturity
date and an optional early redemption of 5 years, or
the date at which the outstanding balance of the
underlying reference loans is less than or equal to
10% of the original balance.
• After maturity or early redemption, if exercised, the
CAS REMIC provides no further credit protection with
respect to the reference loans that were previously
underlying that CAS REMIC transaction.
• Presents minimal counterparty credit risk as the CAS
trust receives the proceeds that will reimburse us for
certain credit events on the related loans upon the
issuance of the CAS REMIC.
CIRT
• Insurance transactions whereby we obtain actual
loss coverage on pools of loans either directly
from an insurance provider that retains the risk, or
from an insurance provider that simultaneously
cedes all of its risk to one or more reinsurers.
• In CIRT deals, we generally retain an initial
portion of losses on the loans in the pool (for
example, the first 0.75% of the initial pool unpaid
principal balance). Reinsurers cover losses above
this retention amount up to a detachment point
(for example, the next 4.0% of the initial pool
unpaid principal balance). We retain all losses
above this detachment point. The initial portion of
losses we retain and the detachment points vary
in CIRT transactions-the percentages provided
above are only examples.
• We make premium payments on CIRT deals that
we recognize in “Credit enhancement expense” in
our consolidated statements of operations and
comprehensive income.
• The insurance layer typically provides coverage for
losses on the pool that are likely to occur only in a
stressed economic environment.
• Insurance benefits are received after the underlying
property has been liquidated and all applicable
proceeds, including private mortgage insurance
benefits, have been applied to the loss.
• To date, CIRT transactions generally have been
structured with 10, 12-1/2, or 18-year terms, and
covered loans that are delinquent as of the final
scheduled month continue to be covered until and
unless they eventually cure. The transaction term may
vary based upon market execution and the capital
benefit.
• Presents counterparty credit risk. A portion of the
insurers’ or reinsurers’ obligations is collateralized with
highly-rated liquid assets held in a trust account
initially determined according to the ratings of such
insurer or reinsurer. Contractual provisions require
additional collateral to be posted in the event of
adverse developments with the counterparty, such as
a ratings downgrade. For additional discussion of our
exposure to and management of counterparty credit
risk associated with CIRT transactions, see “Risk
Management-Institutional Counterparty Credit Risk
Management-Reinsurers.”
CAS Debt
CAS debt transactions are similar to CAS REMIC
transactions, with some key differences:
• CAS debt is recognized as “debt of Fannie Mae”
in our consolidated balance sheets. CAS debt
issued to investors beginning January 2016
through October 2018 is recognized at amortized
cost. CAS debt we issued prior to 2016 is
recognized at fair value.
• We stopped issuing this form of CAS in October
2018.
• Generally issued with a stated final maturity date of
either 10 or 12.5 years from issuance.
• Significant lag exists between the time when we
recognize a provision for credit losses and when we
recognize the related recovery from the CAS debt
transaction.
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
MD&A | Single-Family Business | Single-Family Mortgage Credit Risk Management
The following table displays information about the single-family credit enhancement recovery receivables we have
recognized within “Other assets” in our consolidated balance sheets. The decrease in our single-family freestanding
credit enhancement receivables as of December 31, 2024 compared with December 31, 2023 , was primarily a result of
a decrease in our estimate of single-family credit losses in 2024 . As our estimate for credit losses decreases, so does
the benefit we expect to receive from our freestanding credit enhancements.
Single-Family Credit Enhancement Receivables
As of December 31,
(Dollars in millions)
Freestanding credit enhancement receivables
$ 117
$ 253
Primary mortgage insurance receivables, net of allowance (1)
(1) Amount is net of a valuation allowance of $403 million and $417 million as of December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023 , respectively.
The vast majority of this valuation allowance related to deferred payment obligations associated with unpaid claim amounts for which
collectability is uncertain.
The following table displays the primary characteristics of the loans in our single-family conventional guaranty book of
business without credit enhancement.
Single-Family Loans Currently without Credit Enhancement
As of December 31,
Unpaid
Principal
Balance
Percentage of
Single-Family
Conventional
Guaranty Book
of Business
Unpaid
Principal
Balance
Percentage of
Single-Family
Conventional
Guaranty Book
of Business
(Dollars in billions)
Low LTV ratio or short-term (1)
$ 1,049
29 %
$ 1,112
31 %
Pre-credit risk transfer program inception (2)
Recently acquired (3)
Other (4)
Less: Loans in multiple categories
(258)
(7)
(267)
(7)
Total single-family loans currently without credit enhancement
$ 1,950
54 %
$ 1,991
55 %
(1) Represents loans with an LTV ratio less than or equal to 60% or loans with an original maturity of 20 years or less.
(2) Represents loans that were acquired before the inception of our credit risk transfer programs. Also includes Refi Plus TM loans.
(3) Represents loans that were recently acquired and have not been included in a reference pool.
(4) Includes adjustable-rate mortgage loans, loans with a combined LTV ratio greater than 97%, non-Refi Plus loans acquired after the
inception of our credit risk transfer programs that became 30 or more days delinquent prior to inclusion in a credit risk transfer transaction,
and loans that were delinquent as of December 31, 2024 or December 31, 2023 . Also includes loans that were previously included in a
credit risk transfer transaction but subsequently had the coverage canceled or the covered term of the transaction ended.
Single-Family Problem Loan Management
Overview
Our problem loan management strategies focus primarily on reducing defaults to avoid losses that would otherwise
occur and pursuing foreclosure alternatives to mitigate the severity of the losses we incur. If a borrower does not make
required payments, or is in jeopardy of not making payments, we work with the loan servicer to offer workout solutions
to minimize the likelihood of foreclosure as well as the severity of loss. When appropriate, we seek to move to
foreclosure expeditiously.
Below we describe the following:
• delinquency statistics on our problem loans;
• efforts undertaken to manage our problem loans, including the role of servicers in loss mitigation, forbearance
plans, loan workouts, and sales of nonperforming and reperforming loans;
• metrics regarding our loan workout activities;
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
MD&A | Single-Family Business | Single-Family Mortgage Credit Risk Management
• REO management; and
• other single-family credit-related information, including our credit loss performance and credit loss
concentration metrics.
We also provide ongoing credit performance information on loans underlying single-family Fannie Mae MBS and loans
covered by single-family credit risk transfer transactions. For loans backing Fannie Mae MBS, see the “Forbearance
and Delinquency Dashboard” available in the MBS section of our Data Dynamics ® tool, which is available at
www.fanniemae.com/datadynamics. For loans covered by credit risk transfer transactions, see the “Deal Performance
Data” report available in the CAS and CIRT sections of the tool. Information on our website is not incorporated into this
report. Information in Data Dynamics may differ from similar measures presented in our financial statements and other
public disclosures for a variety of reasons, including as a result of variations in the loan population covered, timing
differences in reporting and other factors.
Delinquency
The tables below display the delinquency status of loans and changes in the volume of seriously delinquent loans in our
single-family conventional guaranty book of business based on the number of loans. Single-family seriously delinquent
loans are loans that are 90 days or more past due or in the foreclosure process. Our single-family serious delinquency
rate is expressed as a percentage of our single-family conventional guaranty book of business based on loan count.
Management monitors the single-family serious delinquency rate as an indicator of potential future credit losses and
loss mitigation activities. Serious delinquency rates are reflective of our performance in assessing and managing credit
risk associated with single-family loans in our guaranty book of business. Typically, higher serious delinquency rates
result in a higher allowance for loan losses.
Delinquency Status and Activity of Single-Family Conventional Loans
As of December 31,
Delinquency status:
30 to 59 days delinquent
1.05 %
1.06 %
0.96 %
60 to 89 days delinquent
0.29
0.26
0.23
Seriously delinquent (“SDQ”):
0.56
0.55
0.65
Percentage of SDQ loans that have been delinquent for more than 180 days
Percentage of SDQ loans that have been delinquent for more than two years
For the Year Ended December 31,
Single-family SDQ loans (number of loans):
Beginning balance
96,479
114,960
218,329
Additions
182,083
169,197
171,437
Removals:
Modifications and other loan workouts
(76,336)
(77,478)
(164,707)
Liquidations and sales
(29,967)
(31,439)
(46,476)
Cured or less than 90 days delinquent
(75,130)
(78,761)
(63,623)
Total removals
(181,433)
(187,678)
(274,806)
Ending balance
97,129
96,479
114,960
Our single-family serious delinquency rate as of December 31, 2024 remained near historically low levels. Our single-
family serious delinquency rate increased slightly by 1 basis point as of year-end 2024 compared with as of year-end
2023 driven by increased delinquencies in areas affected by hurricanes. Given our expectation of slower economic and
home price growth in 2025 and 2026 , th e credit performance of the loans in our single-family guaranty book of business
may decline compared to recent performance, which could lead to higher delinquencies or an increase in our single-
family serious delinquency r ate.
Factors that affect our single-family serious delinquency rate include:
• the percentage of our loans that receive forbearance and the length of time they remain in forbearance;
• the pace and effectiveness of payment deferrals, loan modifications and other workouts;
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
MD&A | Single-Family Business | Single-Family Mortgage Credit Risk Management
• the timing and volume of nonperforming loan sales we execute;
• pandemics and natural disasters;
• servicer performance; and
• changes in home prices, unemployment levels and other macroeconomic conditions.
The table below displays the serious delinquency rates for, and the percentage of our seriously delinquent single-family
conventional loans represented by, the specified loan categories. Percentage of book amounts represent the unpaid
principal balance of loans for each category divided by the unpaid principal balance of our total single-family
conventional guaranty book of business. The reported categories are not mutually exclusive.
Single-Family Conventional Seriously Delinquent Loan Concentration Analysis
As of December 31,
Percentage
of Book
Outstanding
Percentage
of Seriously
Delinquent
Loans (1)
Serious
Delinquency
Rate
Percentage
of Book
Outstanding
Percentage
of Seriously
Delinquent
Loans (1)
Serious
Delinquency
Rate
Percentage
of Book
Outstanding
Percentage
of Seriously
Delinquent
Loans (1)
Serious
Delinquency
Rate
States:
California
19 %
9 %
0.41 %
19 %
10 %
0.42 %
19 %
9 %
0.46 %
Florida
0.96
0.73
0.90
Illinois
0.69
0.70
0.86
New York
0.79
0.92
1.12
Texas
0.73
0.64
0.71
All other states
0.51
0.52
0.62
Estimated mark-to-
market LTV ratio:
<= 60%
0.47
0.49
0.63
60.01% to 70%
0.94
0.80
0.77
70.01% to 80%
0.85
0.77
0.69
80.01% to 90%
0.97
0.81
0.68
90.01% to 100%
0.77
0.59
0.40
Greater than 100%
*
*
2.82
*
*
2.05
*
*
4.04
Credit enhanced: (2)
Primary MI & other (3)
1.17
1.08
1.19
Credit risk transfer (4)
0.61
0.54
0.66
Non-credit enhanced
0.44
0.46
0.55
* Represents less than 0.5% of single-family conventional guaranty book of business.
(1) Calculated based on the number of single-family loans that were seriously delinquent for each category divided by the total number of
single-family conventional loans that were seriously delinquent.
(2) The credit-enhanced categories are not mutually exclusive. A loan with primary mortgage insurance that is also covered by a credit risk
transfer transaction will be included in both the “Primary MI & other” category and the “Credit risk transfer” category. As a result, the “Credit
enhanced” and “Non-credit enhanced” categories do not sum to 100%. The total percentage of our single-family conventional guaranty
book of business with some form of credit enhancement as of December 31, 2024 was 46% .
(3) Refers to loans included in an agreement used to reduce credit risk by requiring primary mortgage insurance, collateral, letters of credit,
corporate guarantees, or other agreements to provide an entity with some assurance that it will be compensated to some degree in the
event of a financial loss. Excludes loans covered by credit risk transfer transactions unless such loans are also covered by primary
mortgage insurance.
(4) Refers to loans included in reference pools for credit risk transfer transactions, including loans in these transactions that are also covered
by primary mortgage insurance. For CAS and some lender risk-sharing transactions, this represents the outstanding unpaid principal
balance of the underlying loans on the single-family mortgage credit book, not the outstanding reference pool, as of the specified date.
Loans included in our credit risk transfer transactions have all been acquired since 2009.
Forbearance Plans and Loan Workouts
As a part of our credit risk management efforts, we offer several types of loss mitigation options to help homeowners
stay in their home or to otherwise avoid foreclosure. Loss mitigation options can consist of a forbearance plan or a loan
workout. Our loan workouts reflect additional types of home retention solutions that help reinstate loans to current
status, including repayment plans, payment deferrals, and loan modifications. Our loan workouts also include
foreclosure alternatives, such as short sales and deeds in-lieu of foreclosure.
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
MD&A | Single-Family Business | Single-Family Mortgage Credit Risk Management
As of December 31, 2024 , the unpaid principal balance of single-family loans in forbearance was $8.0 billion , or 0.2% of
our single-family conventional guaranty book of business, compared with $6.9 billion , or 0.2% of our single-family
conventional guaranty book of business, as of December 31, 2023 .
We work with our servicers to implement our home retention solution and foreclosure alternative initiatives, and we
emphasize the importance of early contact with borrowers and early entry into a home retention solution. We require
that servicers first evaluate borrowers for eligibility under a workout option before considering foreclosure. The existence
of a second lien may limit our ability to provide borrowers with loan workout options, particularly those that are part of
our foreclosure prevention efforts; however, we are not required to contact a second lien holder to obtain their approval
prior to providing a borrower with a loan modification.
Home Retention Solutions
When a borrower cannot bring the loan current by reinstating the loan or through a repayment plan, we use our
payment deferral and loan modification workout options to help resolve the loan’s delinquency. A payment deferral is a
loss mitigation option which defers the repayment of the delinquent principal and interest payments and other eligible
default-related amounts that were advanced on behalf of the borrower by converting them into a non-interest-bearing
balance due at the earlier of the payoff date, the maturity date, or sale or transfer of the property. The remaining
mortgage terms, interest rate, payment schedule, and maturity date remain unchanged, and no trial period is required.
The number of months of payments deferred varies based on the types of hardships the borrower is facing.
We also offer single-family borrowers loan modifications, which contractually change the terms of the loan. Our loan
modification programs generally require completion of a trial period of three to four months where the borrower makes
reduced monthly payments prior to receiving the modification.
Effective December 2024, our loan modifications are designed to reach a 20% targeted principal and interest payment
reduction for the borrower. As outlined by our Servicing Guide, loan modifications include the following concessions as
necessary to achieve a 20% targeted payment reduction:
• capitalization of past due amounts, a form of payment delay, which capitalizes interest and other eligible
default-related amounts that were advanced on behalf of the borrower that are past due into the unpaid
principal balance; and
• a term extension, which may extend the contractual maturity date of the loan up to 40 years from the effective
date of the modification .
In addition to these concessions, loan modifications may also include an interest rate reduction, which reduces the
contractual interest rate of the loan, or a principal forbearance, which is another form of payment delay that includes
forbearing repayment of a portion of the principal balance as a non-interest bearing amount that is due at the earlier of
the payoff date, the maturity date, or sale or transfer of the property.
Our primary loan modification program is currently the Flex Modification program, which offers payment relief for eligible
borrowers.
Foreclosure Alternatives
We offer foreclosure alternatives for borrowers who are unable to retain their homes. Foreclosure alternatives may be
more appropriate if the borrower has experienced a significant adverse change in financial condition due to events such
as long-term unemployment or reduced income, divorce, or unexpected issues like medical bills, and is therefore no
longer able to make the required mortgage payments. To avoid foreclosure and satisfy the first-lien mortgage obligation,
our servicers work with a borrower to:
• accept a deed-in-lieu of foreclosure, whereby the borrower voluntarily signs over the title to their property to the
servicer; or
• sell the home prior to foreclosure in a short sale, whereby the borrower sells the home for less than the full
amount owed to Fannie Mae under the mortgage loan.
These alternatives are designed to reduce our credit losses while helping borrowers avoid having to go through a
foreclosure. We work to obtain the highest price possible for the properties sold in short sales.
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
MD&A | Single-Family Business | Single-Family Mortgage Credit Risk Management
Loan Workout Metrics
The chart below displays the unpaid principal balance of our completed single-family loan workouts by type, as well as
the number of loan workouts. This table does not include loans in an active forbearance arrangement, trial
modifications, and repayment plans that have been initiated but not completed.
(1) There were approximately 19,300 loans, 16,300 loans and 15,800 loans in a trial modification period that was not yet complete as of
December 31, 2024 , 2023 and 2022 , respectively.
(2) Other was $773 million , $516 million and $313 million for the years ended December 31, 2024 , 2023 and 2022 , respectively. Other
includes repayment plans and foreclosure alternatives. Repayment plans reflect only those plans associated with loans that were 60 days
or more delinquent.
The increase in loan workout activity in 2024 compared with 2023 , was primarily driven by an increase in loan
modifications, which includes borrowers affected by hurricanes.
The total amount of principal and interest deferred to the end of the loan term for single-family loans that received a
payment deferral was $308 million for the year ended December 31, 2024 , of which $199 million was deferred interest.
For the year ended December 31, 2023 , the total amount of principal and interest deferred was $408 million , of which
$248 million was deferred interest. For the year ended December 31, 2022 , the total amount of principal and interest
deferred was $990 million , of which $599 million was deferred interest.
The table below displays the percentage of our single-family loan modifications completed during 2023 and 2022 that
were current or paid off one year after modification and, for modifications completed during 2022 , two years after
modification.
Percentage of Single-Family Completed Loan Modifications That Were Current or Paid Off at
One and Two Years Post-Modification
2023 Modifications
2022 Modifications
Q4
Q3
Q2
Q1
Q4
Q3
Q2
Q1
One Year Post-Modification
63%
69%
72%
75%
75%
79%
84%
87%
Two Years Post-Modification
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
MD&A | Single-Family Business | Single-Family Mortgage Credit Risk Management
Nonperforming and Reperforming Loan Sales
We also undertake efforts to mitigate credit losses and manage our problem loans by selling our nonperforming and
reperforming loans, thereby removing them from our guaranty book of business. This problem loan management
strategy is intended to reduce: the number of seriously-delinquent loans, the severity of losses incurred on these loans,
and the capital we would be required to hold for such loans.
Nonperforming and Reperforming Loan Sale Activity
For the Year Ended December 31,
(Dollars in millions)
Reperforming Loan Sales:
Number of loans sold
19,909
11,626
29,676
Aggregate unpaid principal balance of loan sales
$ 3,790
$ 2,219
$ 4,974
Nonperforming Loan Sales:
Number of loans sold
3,978
2,265
8,215
Aggregate unpaid principal balance of loan sales
$ 698
$ 354
$ 1,354
REO Management
If a loan defaults, we may acquire the property through foreclosure or a deed-in-lieu of foreclosure. The table below
displays our REO activity by region. Regional REO acquisition trends generally follow a pattern that is similar to, but
lags, that of regional delinquency trends.
Single-Family REO Properties
For the Year Ended December 31,
Single-family REO properties (number of properties):
Beginning of period inventory of single-family REO properties (1)
8,403
8,779
7,166
Acquisitions by geographic area: (2)
Midwest
1,265
1,606
Northeast
1,049
Southeast
1,136
Southwest
West
Total REO acquisitions (1)
2,994
4,192
4,881
Dispositions of REO
(5,502)
(4,568)
(3,268)
End of period inventory of single-family REO properties (1)
5,895
8,403
8,779
Carrying value of single-family REO properties (dollars in millions)
$ 1,106
$ 1,396
$ 1,293
Single-family foreclosure rate (3)
0.02
%
0.02
%
0.03
%
REO net sales price to unpaid principal balance (4)
%
%
%
REO net sales price to unpaid principal balance and costs to repair (5)
%
%
%
Short sales net sales price to unpaid principal balance (6)
%
%
%
(1) Includes held-for-use properties, which are reported in our consolidated balance sheets as a component of “Other assets.”
(2) See footnote 9 to the “ Key Risk Characteristics of Single-Family Conventional Business Volume and Guaranty Book of Business ” table for
states included in each geographic region.
(3) Reflects the total number of properties acquired through foreclosure or deeds-in-lieu of foreclosure as a percentage of the total number of
loans in our single-family conventional guaranty book of business as of the end of each period.
(4) Calculated as the amount of sale proceeds received on disposition of REO properties during the respective periods, excluding those
subject to repurchase requests made to our sellers or servicers, divided by the aggregate unpaid principal balance of the related loans at
the time of foreclosure. Net sales price represents the contract sales price less selling costs for the property and other charges paid by the
seller at closing, and excludes the cost associated with any property repairs.
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
MD&A | Single-Family Business | Single-Family Mortgage Credit Risk Management
(5) Calculated as the amount of sale proceeds received on disposition of REO properties during the respective periods, excluding those
subject to repurchase requests made to our sellers or servicers, divided by the aggregate unpaid principal balance of the related loans at
the time of foreclosure and costs to repair the property. Net sales price represents the contract sales price less selling costs for the
property and other charges paid by the seller at closing.
(6) Calculated as the amount of sale proceeds received on properties sold in short sale transactions during the respective periods divided by
the aggregate unpaid principal balance of the related loans. Net sales price includes borrower relocation incentive payments and
subordinate lien(s) negotiated payoffs.
Although our REO net sales price to unpaid principal balance rose from 129% in 2023 to 143% in 2024, that increase
was more than offset by the impact of increased costs we have incurred to repair the condition of properties, which
resulted in a decline in our REO net sales price to unpaid principal balance and costs to repair from 97% in 2023 to 89%
in 2024.
We conduct repairs on the majority of the REO properties we acquire. These improvements help make the homes more
sustainable and support sales to owner-occupant buyers.
We market and sell the majority of our foreclosed properties through local real estate professionals. In some cases, we
use alternative methods of disposition, including selling homes to municipalities, other public entities or non-profit
organizations, and selling properties through public auctions. We also engage in third-party sales at foreclosure, which
allow us to avoid maintenance and other REO expenses we would have incurred had we acquired the property.
As shown in the chart below, the majority of our REO properties are unable to be marketed at any given time because
the properties are under repair, occupied or are subject to state or local redemption or confirmation periods, which
delays the marketing and disposition of these prop erties.
Single-Family Credit Loss Performance Metrics and Loan Sale Performance
The single-family credit loss performance metrics and loan sale performance measures below present information about
losses or gains we realized on our single-family loans during the periods presented. For the purposes of our single-
family credit loss performance metrics, credit losses or gains represent write-offs net of recoveries and foreclosed
property income or expense. The amount of these losses or gains in a given period is driven by foreclosures, pre-
foreclosure sales, post-foreclosure REO activity, mortgage loan redesignations, and other events that trigger write-offs
and recoveries. The single-family credit loss metrics we present are not defined terms and may not be calculated in the
same manner as similarly titled measures reported by other companies. Management uses these measures to evaluate
the effectiveness of our single-family credit risk management strategies in conjunction with leading indicators such as
serious delinquency and forbearance rates, which are potential indicators of future realized single-family credit losses.
We believe these measures provide useful information about our single-family credit performance and the factors that
impact it.
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
MD&A | Single-Family Business | Single-Family Mortgage Credit Risk Management
The table below displays the components of our single-family credit loss performance metrics. Because sales of
nonperforming and reperforming loans are a part of our credit loss mitigation strategy, we also provide information in the
table below on our loan sale performance through the “Gains (losses) on sales and other valuation adjustments” line
item.
Single-Family Credit Loss Performance Metrics and Loan Sale Performance
For the Year Ended December 31,
(Dollars in millions)
Write-offs
$ (458)
$ (223)
$ (211)
Recoveries
Foreclosed property income (expense)
(387)
(55)
Credit gains (losses)
(587)
(3)
Write-offs on the redesignation of mortgage loans from HFI to HFS (1)
(270)
(658)
(679)
Net credit gains (losses) and write-offs on redesignations
(857)
(661)
(657)
Gains (losses) on sales and other valuation adjustments (2)
(21)
(52)
(207)
Net credit gains (losses), write-offs on redesignations and gains (losses) on sales
and other valuation adjustments
$ (878)
$ (713)
$ (864)
Credit gain (loss) ratio (in bps) (3)
(1.6)
*
0.1
Net credit gains (losses), write-offs on redesignations and gains (losses) on sales
and other valuation adjustments ratio (in bps) (4)
(2.4)
(2.0)
(2.4)
* Represents less than 0.05 bps.
(1) Consists of the lower of cost or fair value adjustment at time of redesignation.
(2) Consists of gains or losses realized on the sales of nonperforming and reperforming mortgage loans during the period and temporary
lower-of-cost-or-market adjustments on HFS loans, which are recognized in “Investment gains (losses), net” in our consolidated
statements of operations and comprehensive income.
(3) Calculated based on the amount of “Credit gains (losses)” divided by the average single-family conventional guaranty book of business
during the period.
(4) Calculated based on the amount of “Net credit gains (losses), write-offs on redesignations and gains (losses) on sales and other valuation
adjustments” divided by the average single-family conventional guaranty book of business during the period.
The primary drivers of our net credit gains (losses), write-offs on redesignations and gains (losses) on sales and other
valuation adjustments in 2024 were write-offs on loans for which collectability was no longer reasonably assured as well
as foreclosed property expense.
The primary driver of our net credit gains (losses), write-offs on redesignations and gains (losses) on sales and other
valuation adjustments in 2023 was write-offs upon the redesignation of mortgage loans from HFI to HFS. During 2023 ,
we redesignated loans with an amortized cost of $3.3 billion . Interest rates on loans redesignated in 2023 were below
current market interest rates resulting in write-offs upon the redesignation.
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
MD&A | Single-Family Business | Single-Family Mortgage Credit Risk Management
The table below displays concentrations of our net single-family credit gains (losses) and write-offs on redesignations
based on geography.
Concentration Analysis of Net Credit Gains (Losses) and Write-offs on Redesignations
Percentage of Single-Family
Conventional Guaranty Book
of Business Outstanding (1)
Amount of Single-Family
Credit Gains (Losses) and
Redesignation Write-offs (2)
As of December 31,
For the year ended
December 31,
(Dollars in millions)
Geographical distribution:
California
19 %
19 %
$ (110)
$ (115)
Florida
(36)
(15)
Illinois
(67)
(51)
New York
(80)
(64)
Texas
(44)
(39)
All other states
(520)
(377)
Total
100 %
100 %
$ (857)
$ (661)
(1) Calculated based on the aggregate unpaid principal balance of single-family loans for each category divided by the aggregate unpaid
principal balance of loans in our single-family conventional guaranty book of business as of the end of each period.
(2) Credit gains (losses) and write-offs on redesignations do not include gains (losses) on sales and other valuation adjustments. Excludes the
impact of recoveries resulting from resolution agreements related to representation and warranty matters and compensatory fee income
related to servicing matters that have not been allocated to specific loans.
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
MD&A | Single-Family Business | Single-Family Mortgage Credit Risk Management
Single-Family Maturity Information
The below table shows the contractual maturities and interest rate sensitivities of our single-family mortgage loan
portfolio as recorded on our consolidated balance sheets. Although the loans in our consolidated portfolio have varying
contractual terms (for example, 15-year, 30-year, etc.), the actual life of the loans is likely to be significantly less than
their contractual term as a result of prepayment. Therefore, the contractual term is not a reliable indicator of the loans’
expected lives. Single-family mortgages can be prepaid in whole or in part at any time without penalty.
Single-Family Loans: Maturities and Terms of the Consolidated Mortgage Loan Portfolio (1)
As of December 31, 2024
Due within 1
year (2)
Greater than 1
year but
within 5 years
Greater than 5
years but
within 15
years
Greater than
15 years
Total
(Dollars in millions)
Single-family mortgage loans:
Loans held for sale
$ 13
$ 37
$ 113
$ 295
$ 458
Loans held for investment
Of Fannie Mae
3,618
3,962
11,382
29,795
48,757
Of consolidated trusts
126,796
530,526
1,343,818
1,570,265
3,571,405
Total unpaid principal balance of
single-family mortgage loans
130,427
534,525
1,355,313
1,600,355
3,620,620
Cost basis adjustments, net
36,398
Total single-family mortgage loans (3)
$ 130,427
$ 534,525
$ 1,355,313
$ 1,600,355
$ 3,657,018
Single-family mortgage loans by interest rate sensitivity:
Fixed-rate
$ 126,338
$ 530,562
$ 1,344,300
$ 1,588,568
$ 3,589,768
Adjustable-rate
4,089
3,963
11,013
11,787
30,852
Total unpaid principal balance of single-
family mortgage loans
$ 130,427
$ 534,525
$ 1,355,313
$ 1,600,355
$ 3,620,620
(1) We report the scheduled repayments in the maturity category in which the payment is due, such that a loan’s balance may be presented
across multiple maturity categories.
(2) Due within 1 year includes reverse mortgages for which there is no defined maturity date of $3.2 billion as of December 31, 2024 .
(3) Excludes accrued interest receivable. The unpaid principal balance of single family loans is based on the amount of contractual unpaid
principal balance due and excludes any write-offs for amounts deemed uncollectible. Those write-offs are presented as a component of
cost basis adjustments, net.
Multifamily Business
Multifamily Primary Business Activities
Providing Liquidity for Multifamily Mortgage Loans
Our Multifamily business provides mortgage market liquidity primarily for properties with five or more residential units,
which may be apartment communities, cooperative properties, seniors housing, dedicated student housing or
manufactured housing communities. Our Multifamily business works with our multifamily lenders to provide funds to the
mortgage market primarily by securitizing multifamily mortgage loans acquired from these lenders into Fannie Mae
MBS, which are sold to investors or dealers. We also purchase multifamily mortgage loans and provide credit
enhancement for bonds issued by state and local housing finance authorities to finance multifamily housing. Our
Multifamily business supports liquidity in the mortgage market through other activities, such as buying and selling
Fannie Mae multifamily MBS and issuing structured securities backed by Fannie Mae collateral. We also continue to
invest in multifamily Low Income Housing Tax Credit (“LIHTC”) projects to help support and preserve the supply of
affordable rental housing.
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
MD&A | Multifamily Business | Multifamily Primary Business Activities
Key Characteristics of the Multifamily Business
The Multifamily business has a number of key characteristics that distinguish it from our Single-Family business.
• Collateral: Multifamily loans are collateralized by properties that generate cash flows predominantly driven by
rental income received from tenants and effectively operate as businesses.
• Borrowers and sponsors: Multifamily borrowing entities are typically owned, directly or indirectly, by for-profit
corporations, limited liability companies, partnerships, real estate investment trusts and individuals who invest
in real estate for cash flow and expected returns in excess of their original contribution of equity. Borrowing
entities are typically single-asset entities, with the property as their only asset. The ultimate owner of a
multifamily borrowing entity is referred to as the “sponsor.” We evaluate both the borrowing entity and its
sponsor when considering a new transaction and managing our business. We refer to both the borrowing
entities and their sponsors as “borrowers.” When considering a multifamily borrower, creditworthiness is
evaluated through a combination of quantitative and qualitative data, including liquid assets, net worth, number
of units owned, experience in a market and/or property type, multifamily portfolio performance, access to
additional liquidity, debt maturities, asset/property management platform, senior management experience,
reputation, and exposures to lenders and Fannie Mae.
• Non-recourse: Multifamily loans are generally non-recourse to the borrowers, meaning that we may only seek
repayment of the loan through the value of the underlying collateral.
• Lenders: During 2024 , we executed multifamily transactions with 28 lenders. Of these, 24 lenders delivered
loans to us under our DUS program described below. In determining whether to enter into a selling and
servicing arrangement with a multifamily lender, we consider the lender’s: financial strength; multifamily
underwriting and servicing experience and processes, including relevant policies and procedures in place;
portfolio performance; and willingness and ability to share in the risk of loss associated with the multifamily
loans they originate.
• Loan size: The average size of a multifamily loan (based on unpaid principal balance) in our guaranty book of
business is much larger than the average size of a single-family loan. See “ Single-Family Guaranty Book
Diversification and Monitoring ” and “ Multifamily Guaranty Book Diversification and Monitoring ” for additional
information about the average size of single-family and multifamily loans in our guaranty book.
• Underwriting process: Multifamily loans require detailed underwriting of the property’s operating cash flow. Our
underwriting standards include an evaluation of the property’s operating income compared to loan payments,
property market value, property quality and condition, market and submarket factors, and ability to refinance at
maturity.
• Term and lifecycle: In contrast to the standard 30-year single-family residential loan, multifamily loans typically
have original loan terms of 5 , 7 , or 10 years, with balloon payments due at maturity.
• Prepayment terms: To reduce the likelihood of prepayments during the term of a loan, most multifamily Fannie
Mae loans impose prepayment premiums , primarily yield maintenance. This is in contrast to single-family loans,
which do not have prepayment premiums.
Delegated Underwriting and Servicing Program
Fannie Mae’s DUS program is a unique business model that i s intended to align the interests of the lender and Fannie
Mae. Our DUS lender network of 24 current members is composed of mortgage banking companies, large diversified
financial institutions, and banks. We pre-approve DUS lenders and delegate to these lenders the authority to underwrite
and service multifamily loans on our behalf in accordance with our standards and requirements. Delegation permits
lenders to respond to customers more rapidly, as the lender generally has the authority to approve a loan within our
prescribed parameters. In certain cases when a loan’s credit characteristics do not meet established delegation criteria,
Fannie Mae’s internal credit team may assess whether a loan’s risk profile is within our risk tolerance.
DUS lenders typically share a portion of the credit risk on our multifamily loans for the life of the loans. The servicing
fees we pay to DUS lenders include compensation for the portion of credit risk they retain. See “ Multifamily Mortgage
Credit Risk Management ” for additional information about our lender risk sharing.
Multifamily Mortgage Servicing
Substantially all of the multifamily loans in our guaranty book of business as of December 31, 2024 and 2023 were
serviced by DUS lenders or their affiliates on our behalf. Multifamily servicers are responsible for the evaluation of the
financial condition of properties and property owners, administering various types of loan- and property-level
agreements (including agreements covering replacement reserves, completion or repair, and operations and
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
MD&A | Multifamily Business | Multifamily Primary Business Activities
maintenance), as well as conducting routine property inspections. When elevated risks in a transaction are identified,
we may require additional evaluation and mitigation of these risks, such as conducting additional property inspections
and requiring borrowers to complete repairs within specific timelines. We monitor multifamily servicing relationships and
retain the right to approve servicing transfers, which are infrequent.
Multifamily Credit Risk and Credit Loss Management
Our Multifamily business:
• Sets the underwriting and servicing standards and credit requirements for lenders to underwrite multifamily
loans on our behalf.
• Prices and manages the credit risk on loans in our multifamily guaranty book of business. Lenders retain a
portion of the credit risk in substantially all multifamily transactions.
• Enters into additional transactions that transfer a portion of Fannie Mae’s credit risk on some of the loans in our
multifamily guaranty book of business through back-end credit risk transfer transactions.
• Works to reduce costs of defaulted multifamily loans, including through loss mitigation strategies such as
forbearance and modification, management of foreclosures and our REO inventory, and pursuing contractual
remedies from lenders, servicers, borrowers, sponsors, and providers of credit enhancement.
See “ Multifamily Mortgage Credit Risk Management ” for a discussion of our strategies for managing credit risk and
credit losses on multifamily loans.
Multifamily Activities Supporting Affordable Rental Housing
Overview
A core component of Fannie Mae’s mission is to support the U.S. multifamily housing market by helping serve the
nation’s rental housing needs. We focus on supporting affordable housing, which is housing that is affordable to
households earning at or below the median income in their area, as well as on workforce housing, which is housing that
is affordable to those earning at or below 120% of area median income . Approximately 95% of the multifamily units we
financed in 2024 that were potentially eligible for housing goals credit were affordable to those earning at or below
120% of the median income in their area. The chart below shows a breakout of multifamily acquisitions by area median
income.
Multifamily Acquisitions by Area Median Income (AMI) (1)
(1) Based on rents reported at loan origination. Rents may change following loan origination. Reflects multifamily acquisitions potentially
eligible for housing goals credit, which consists of new units financed by first liens; excludes second liens on units for which we had
financed the first lien, manufactured housing communities, and manufactured housing rentals.
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
MD&A | Multifamily Business | Multifamily Primary Business Activities
Targeted Affordable Housing
To serve low- and very-low-income households, we have a team that focuses exclusively on relationships with lenders
financing privately-owned multifamily properties that receive public subsidies in exchange for maintaining long-term
affordable rents. We work with borrowers that may utilize housing programs and subsidies provided by local, state and
federal agencies; examples include tax incentives (such as those provided through LIHTC or tax abatement) and rent
subsidies (such as project-based Section 8 rental assistance or tenant vouchers). The public subsidy programs are
largely targeted to provide housing to those earning less than 60% of area median income (as defined by HUD) and are
structured to ensure that the low- and very low-income households who benefit from the programs pay no more than
30% of their gross monthly income for rent and utilities . As of December 31, 2024 , these affordable loans represented
approximately 12% of our multifamily guaranty book of business, based on unpaid principal balance, including
$7.1 billion in bond credit enhancements.
Our acquisition of loans financing properties affordable to low- and very-low income households help us meet our
multifamily housing goals and FHFA’s requirement that a portion of our multifamily volume be focused on affordable and
underserved markets. We discuss our multifamily housing goals in “ Business - Legislation and Regulation - Housing
Goals - Multifamily Housing Goals ” and we discuss our requirement to focus on affordable and underserved markets in
“ Multifamily Business Metrics -Multifamily New Business Volume.”
Equity Investments in Low Income Housing Tax Credit Projects
We make equity investments in LIHTC partnerships. These LIHTC partnerships have generally been established to
identify, develop and operate multifamily housing that is leased to qualifying residential tenants. LIHTC encourages
private equity investment in creating and preserving affordable units throughout the country by awarding federal tax
credits to affordable housing developers, who then exchange those tax credits with corporate investors, such as Fannie
Mae, in return for capital contributions. FHFA has capped our LIHTC investments at $1 billion per year, with any
investments above $500 million in a given year required to be targeted towards transactions identified as having
difficulty attracting investors or in d uty to serve -designated rural areas.
Multifamily Lenders and Investors
Our Multifamily business works primarily with our DUS lender network. During 2024 , our top five multifamily lenders, in
the aggregate, accounted for 49% of our multifamily business volume, compared with 48% in 2023 . Three of our
lenders, Walker & Dunlop, Berkadia Commercial Mortgage, and CBRE Multifamily Capital accounted for 13% , 11% , and
11% , respectively, of our 2024 multifamily business volume. No other lenders accounted for 10% or more of our
multifamily business volume in 2024 .
We have a diversified funding base of domestic and international investors. Purchasers of multifamily Fannie Mae MBS
include fund managers, commercial banks, pension funds, insurance companies, corporations, state and local
governments, and other municipal authorities. We also have separate investor bases for our back-end credit risk
transactions. Our Multifamily Connecticut Avenue Securities TM (“MCAS TM ”) investors include fund managers, hedge
funds and insurance companies, while our Multifamily CIRT TM (“MCIRT TM ”) transactions are executed with insurers and
reinsurers.
Multifamily Competition
We compete to acquire multifamily mortgage assets in the secondary mortgage market and to issue multifamily
mortgage-backed securities to investors. Our primary competitors for the acquisition of multifamily mortgage assets are
Freddie Mac, life insurers, U.S. banks and thrifts, and other institutional investors. Our primary competitors for the
issuance of multifamily mortgage-backed securities are Freddie Mac, U.S. banks, Ginnie Mae, and private-label issuers
of commercial mortgage-backed securities. Competition in these activities is significantly affected by: our and our
competitors’ pricing, eligibility standards, loan structures and risk appetite; lender preferences ; the number and types of
multifamily mortgage loans offered for sale in the secondary mortgage market; investor demand for our and our
competitors’ mortgage-backed securities; and macroeconomic conditions. Our ability to compete may also be affected
by many other factors, including: actions we take to support affordable multifamily housing; direction from FHFA; our
senior preferred stock purchase agreement with Treas ury ; our or our competitors’ capital requirements; our and Freddie
Mac’s return on capital requirements; and new or existing legislation or regulations applicable to us, our lenders or our
investors. The nature of our primary competitors and the overall levels of competition we face could change as a result
of a variety of factors, many of which are outside our control. See “ Business - Conservatorship and Treasury
Agreements ,” “ Business - Legislation and Regulation ,” and “ Risk Factors ” for information on matters that could affect
our business and competitive environment.
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
MD&A | Multifamily Business | Multifamily Mortgage Market
Multifamily Mortgage Market
Multifamily market fundamentals, which include factors such as vacancy rates and rent growth, were mixed during the
fourth quarter of 2024 , due to ongoing demand and elevated levels of new supply entering various markets across the
country. Although the national vacancy rate is estimated to have remained steady, rents declined.
• Vacancy rates . Based on preliminary third-party data, we estimate that the national multifamily vacancy rate for
institutional investment-type apartment properties remained steady at 6.0% as of December 31, 2024 , the
same as of September 30, 2024 and December 31, 2023 . The estimated average national multifamily vacancy
rate over the last 15 years is approximately 5.8% .
• Rents . Based on preliminary third-party data, we estimate that effective rents decreased approximately 0.5%
during the fourth quarter of 2024 , compared to an increase of 0.2% during the third quarter of 2024 , and a
decrease of 0.7% during the fourth quarter of 2023 .
Vacancy rates and rents are important to loan performance because multifamily loans are generally repaid from the
cash flows generated by the underlying property. Several years of low vacancy rates and rising rents helped to increase
property values in most metropolitan areas, but that trend reversed starting in early 2023 . Based on preliminary
multifamily property sales data, transaction volumes for 2024 remained well below average levels. Available data
suggests that multifamily property capitalization rates, the indicated rate of return on investment of a commercial
property, are estimated at 5.4% in the fourth quarter of 2024 , a slight decline from 5.6% in the third quarter of 2024 , and
lower than 5.5% in the fourth quarter of 2023 .
We estimate that more than 575,000 multifamily units were delivered to the U.S. housing market in 2024 . Multifamily
construction remains elevated . There were more than 850,000 rental units underway as of December 2024 . Based on
recent historical trends, we expect between 450,000 and 500,000 units will be completed in 2025 .
We believe vacancy levels could rise to 6.25% in early 2025 , due to elevated new construction completions. Despite
elevated levels of new supply, we expect rent growth in the 2.0% to 2.5% range during 2025, due to anticipated ongoing
job growth, positive demographic trends, and elevated mortgage rates and single-family housing prices keeping many
tenants renting longer.
During the last two years, high interest rates and investor yield requirements have reduced multifamily property sales
transactions and placed downward pressure on multifamily property valuations. According to data from the MSCI RCA
Commercial Property Price Index (“RCA CPPI TM ”), multifamily property values declined 19% from the peak in the
second quarter of 2022 to the fourth quarter of 2024 . However, there have been recent stabilizing trends including
slowing property value declines, positive demographics, ongoing job growth, a drop-off in new supply entering the
market, and continued demand for rentals due to tenants renting for longer. We believe that multifamily sales activity
may increase over the next 12 to 18 months due to elevated new supply completions, increasing rent growth, and
ongoing demand from tenants, and over the longer term, we expect sales and valuations will keep rising.
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
MD&A | Multifamily Business | Multifamily Mortgage Acquisition Share
Multifamily Mortgage Acquisition Share
The chart below displays our estimated share of multifamily mortgage acquisitions during the twelve months ended as
of September 30, 2024 , the latest date available, and the twelve months ended September 30, 2023 , as compared with
that of our primary competitors for the acquisition of multifamily mortgage assets .
Multifam ily Mortgage Acquisition Share (1)
Fannie Mae
Ginnie Mae
Depository Institutions
Others (2)
Freddie Mac
Life Insurers
Non-Traditional MF Lenders
Conduit
s
(1) According to the American Council of Life Insurers (“ACLI”), Trepp, Mortgage Bankers Association and Fannie Mae Multifamily Economic
and Strategic Research Group.
(2) Other includes state and local credit agencies, FHLBs and other financial institutions.
Multifamily Mortgage Debt Outstanding
As shown in the chart below, we have remained a continuous source of liquidity in the U.S. multifamily market .
Multifamily Mortgage Debt Outstanding (1 )
(Dollars in trillions)
(1) Multifamily mortgage debt outstanding as of September 30, 2024 is based on the Federal Reserve’s December 2024 mortgage debt
outstanding release, the latest date for which the Federal Reserve has estimated mortgage debt outstanding for multifamily residences.
Prior-period amounts have been updated to reflect revised historical data from the Federal Reserve.
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
MD&A | Multifamily Business | Multifamily Business Metrics
Multifamily Business Metrics
Multifamily New Business Volume
The chart below displays our new loan acquisitions by unpaid principal balance and number of units financed.
Multifamily New Business Volu me
(Dollars in billions)
(1) Reflects unpaid principal balance of new multifamily loans securitized or purchased as well as credit enhancements provided during the
period. These figures will not agree to Fannie Mae MBS issued during the period, as Fannie Mae MBS issued also include portfolio
securitizations and certain conversions that result in a new Fannie Mae MBS issuance without being a new loan and exclude credit
enhancements.
(2) Reflects new units financed by first liens; excludes second liens on units for which we had financed the first lien, as well as manufactured
housing rentals.
Multifamily business volumes increased in 2024 compared with 2023 , reflecting increased market activity in the fourth
quarter of 2024 . We are subject to an annual multifamily loan purchase cap set by FHFA. In 2024 , we remained below
our multifamily volume cap of $70 billion. For 2025, FHFA has increased our multifamily volume cap to $73 billion. FHFA
has exempted from the volume cap loans financing workforce housing properties meeting specified criteria that
preserve long-term affordability for the properties. Consistent with the 2024 cap, a minimum of 50% of our 2025
multifamily loan purchases must be mission-driven, focused on specified affordable and underserved market segments.
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
MD&A | Multifamily Business | Multifamily Business Metrics
Multifamily Securities Issuances
We securitize the vast majority of multifamily mortgage loans we acquire through lender swap transactions. We also
support liquidity in the market by issuing structured MBS backed by multifamily Fannie Mae MBS, including through our
Fannie Mae GeMS TM program.
Multifamily Fannie Mae MBS Issuances
(Dollars in billions)
(1) A portion of structured securities issuances may be backed by Fannie Mae MBS issued during the same period and held by Fannie Mae.
Structured securities backed by Fannie Mae MBS that are issued by a third party are not included in the multifamily Fannie Mae MBS
structured security issuance amounts.
Multifamily Guaranty Book of Business and Average Charged Guaranty Fee
The chart below displays the unpaid principal balance and average charged guaranty fee related to our multifamily
guaranty book of business.
Multifamily Guaranty Book of Business and Charged Fee
( Dollars in billions )
(1) Our multifamily guaranty book of business primarily consists of multifamily mortgage loans underlying Fannie Mae MBS outstanding,
multifamily mortgage loans of Fannie Mae held in our retained mortgage portfolio, and other credit enhancements that we provide on
multifamily mortgage assets. It does not include non-Fannie Mae multifamily mortgage-related securities held in our retained mortgage
portfolio for which we do not provide a guaranty.
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
MD&A | Multifamily Business | Multifamily Business Metrics
Our multifamily guaranty book of business grew to $499.7 billion as of December 31, 2024, a 6.2% increase from
December 31, 2023 , driven by our acquisitions combined with low prepayment volumes due to the high interest rate
environment.
Our average charged guaranty fee represents the return we earn as compensation for the credit risk we assume on our
multifamily guaranty book of business. The average charged guaranty fee on our multifamily guaranty book of business
decreased in 2024 compared with 2023 , due to lower average charged fees on our 2024 acquisitions as compared with
the existing loans in our multifamily guaranty book of business. Our guaranty fee i s impacted by the rate at which loans
in our book of business turn over as well as the guaranty fees we charge on new business volumes, which are set at the
time we acquire the loans. Our multifamily guaranty fee pricing is primarily based on the individual credit risk
characteristics of the loans we acquire and the overall composition of our multifamily guaranty book of business. Our
multifamily guaranty fee pricing is also influenced by external forces, such as the availability and cost of other sources of
liquidity, our mission-related goals, the FHFA volume cap, interest rates, and MBS spreads.
Multifamily Mortgage Credit Risk Management
Our strategy for managing multifamily mortgage credit risk consists of the following primary components:
• our acquisition and servicing policies along with our underwriting and servicing standards;
• guaranty book diversification and monitoring;
• the transfer of mortgage credit risk to third parties; and
• management of problem loans.
The credit risk profile of a loan in our multifamily guaranty book of business is primarily influenced by:
• the current and anticipated cash flows from the property;
• the type and location of the property;
• the condition and value of the property;
• the financial strength of the borrower;
• market trends; and
• the structure of the financing.
These and other factors affect both the amount of expected credit loss on a given loan and the sensitivity of that loss to
changes in the economic environment. These factors and our strategy for managing multifamily mortgage credit risk are
described in more detail below.
We typically obtain our multifamily credit information from the lenders or servicers of the mortgage loans in our guaranty
book of business and receive representations and warranties from them as to the accuracy of the information. While we
perform various quality assurance checks by sampling loans to assess compliance with our underwriting and eligibility
criteria, we do not independently verify all reported information and we rely on lender representations and warranties
regarding the accuracy of the characteristics of loans in our guaranty book of business. See “ Risk Factors ” for a
discussion of risks relating to mortgage fraud as a result of this reliance on lender representations and warranties.
Multifamily Acquisition Policy and Underwriting Standards
Our Multifamily business is responsible for pricing and managing the credit risk on our multifamily guaranty book of
business. Multifamily loans that we purchase or that back Fannie Mae MBS are underwritten by a Fannie Mae-approved
lender and may be subject to our underwriting review prior to closing, depending on the product type, loan size, market
and/or other factors. Our underwriting standards generally include, among other things, property cash flow analysis and
third-party appraisals. We periodically refine our underwriting standards based on changes in our risk appetite.
Our standards for multifamily loans specify maximum original LTV ratio and minimum original DSCR values that vary
based on loan characteristics. Our experience has been that original LTV ratio and DSCR values have been reliable
indicators of future credit performance. We limit acquisitions of multifamily loans with original LTV ratios greater than
80% or with original DSCRs of 1.25 or less, as they pose more credit risk than we typically seek. The percentage of our
new multifamily business volume acquired in 2024 and 2023 with original LTV ratios greater than 80% was
approximately 1% . The percentage of new multifamily business volume acquired in 2024 with original DSCRs (based on
actual debt service payments) of 1.25 or less was approximately 4% , compared with approximately 2% in 2023 .
We have discovered instances of multifamily lending transactions in which one or more of the parties involved engaged
in mortgage fraud or possible mortgage fraud, and we continue to investigate additional multifamily lending transactions
in which we suspect fraud may have occurred and may discover additional multifamily loans we have purchased that
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
MD&A | Multifamily Business | Multifamily Mortgage Credit Risk Management
were affected by fraud. As described in “ Risk Factors ,” certain gaps have been identified in our processes for managing
multifamily loan origination fraud risk and for overseeing our multifamily seller/servicer counterparties. As a result, we
have implemented proces s improvements to reinforce and clarify our requirements for multifamily sellers and servicers,
including enhanced lender due diligence requirements for borrowers, additional requirements for brokered transactions,
and an expanded vendor review process. We continue to work to improve our processes to further reduce the risk we
face from fraudulent practices, including implementing updates to our DUS Guide and expanding resources dedicated
to oversight of multifamily sellers and servicers. In addition, we continue to pursue contractual remedies against
multifamily lenders where we find breaches of the selling representations that lenders are required to provide on loans
they sell to us, as well as against multifamily borrowers and sponsors.
Multifamily Guaranty Book Diversification and Monitoring
Diversification within our multifamily guaranty book of business by geographic concentration, term to maturity, interest
rate structure, borrower concentration, loan size, property type, and credit enhancement coverage are important factors
that influence credit performance and may help reduce our credit risk.
As part of our ongoing credit risk management process, we and our lenders monitor the performance and risk
characteristics of our multifamily loans and the underlying properties on an ongoing basis throughout the loan term at
the asset and portfolio level. We generally require lenders to provide quarterly and/or annual financial updates for
multifamily loans. We closely monitor loans that are higher risk, including loans with an estimated current DSCR below
1.0, as that is an indicator of heightened default risk.
The physical condition of the properties that serve as collateral for our multifamily loans is an important credit risk
characteristic. As such, we require that our lenders assess property condition at origination, and our lenders also
conduct and deliver to us their property assessments throughout the life of the loan. We maintain a robust quality control
process with respect to property condition, including requiring third-party inspections for certain properties with a higher
risk profile. Some borrowers may not invest in needed property repairs and maintenance, or in capital replacements,
particularly in times of economic stress when they may not have sufficient resources. When concerns about property
condition of underlying collateral arise, we have a dedicated team that actively engages with our lenders and borrowers
to seek remediation of the identified issues. Failure to perform repairs may result in a default under the loan documents.
We manage our exposure to interest-rate risk and monitor changes in interest rates, which can impact multiple aspects
of our multifamily loans. High interest rates may reduce the ability of multifamily borrowers to refinance their loans,
which often have balloon balances at maturity. We have a team that proactively manages upcoming loan maturities t o
minimize losses on maturing loans . This team assists lenders and borrowers with timely and appropriate refinancing of
maturing loans with the goal of reducing defaults and foreclosures related to these loans. We provide information on the
maturity schedule of our multifamily loans in “Multifamily Problem Loan Management and Multifamily Maturity
Information” below and in our quarterly financial supplements, which we furnish to the SEC with current reports on Form
8-K and make available on our website. Information in our quarterly financial supplements is not incorporated by
reference into this report.
Additionally, in a high interest-rate environment, multifamily borrowers with adjustable-rate mortgages will have higher
monthly payments, which may lower their DSCRs. The percentage of our multifamily guaranty book of business with a
c urrent DSCR below 1.0 was approximately 6% as of December 31, 2024 , compared to 4% as of December 31, 2023 ,
as displayed in the table below. This increase was primarily attributable to properties financed with adjustable-rate
mortgages reporting lower DSCRs in their latest operating statements as a result of the current interest rate
environment. We generally require multifamily borrowers with adjustable-rate mortgages to purchase and maintain
interest rate caps for the life of the loan to protect against large movements in rates as well as maintain escrows at our
servicers to reserve for the cost of replacing these caps. Purchasing or replacing required interest rate caps, especially
those with longer terms and/or lower capped interest rates, becomes more expensive as interest rates rise. These
costs, which have been elevated since mid-2022, combined with the higher monthly payments, have added pressure to
borrowers’ ability to make payments and contributed to our elevated multifamily serious delinquency rate and criticized
loan population. In the recent high interest rate environment, most multifamily borrowers with adjustable-rate mortgages
have been receiving payments from their interest rate cap providers, which helps to defray the higher cost of debt
service and escrow payments. We actively monitor these interest-rate related risks as part of our risk management
process. For more information on our criticized loan population, see “ Multifamily Problem Loan Management -Credit
Performance Statistics on Multifamily Problem Loans. ”
In addition to the factors discussed above, we track the following credit risk characteristics to determine loan credit
quality indicators, which are the internal risk categories we use and which are further discussed in “ Note 4, Mortgage
Loans ”:
• the physical condition of the property;
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
MD&A | Multifamily Business | Multifamily Mortgage Credit Risk Management
• delinquency status;
• the relevant local market and economic conditions that may signal changing risk or return profiles; and
• other risk factors.
For example, we closely monitor rental payment trends and vacancy levels in local markets, as well as capitalization
rates, to identify loans that merit closer attention or loss mitigation actions. The primary asset management
responsibilities for our multifamily loans are performed by our DUS and other multifamily lenders. We periodically
evaluate these lenders’ performance for compliance with our asset management criteria.
We also monitor for risks manifesting within specific property types. A property type we continue to monitor closely is
seniors housing. In our book of business, seniors housing is primarily comprised of independent living, assisted living,
and memory care facilities, which generally have limited or no capacity devoted to skilled nursing . Although seniors
housing loans constituted only 3% of our multifamily guaranty book of business as of December 31, 2024 , based on
unpaid principal balance, they constituted approximately 21% of our seriously delinquent multifamily loan population, as
described below in “Multifamily Problem Loan Management.” Approximately 24% of our seniors housing loans were
adjustable-rate mortgages as of December 31, 2024 . We continue to monitor seniors housing loans in our multifamily
guaranty book of business closely and actively manage loans that may be at risk of further deterioration or default.
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
MD&A | Multifamily Business | Multifamily Mortgage Credit Risk Management
The following table displays our multifamily business volumes and our multifamily guaranty book of business, based on
certain key risk characteristics that we use to evaluate the risk profile and credit quality of our multifamily loans.
We provide additional information on the credit characteristics of our multifamily loans in quarterly financial
supplements, which we furnish to the SEC with current reports on Form 8-K and make available on our website.
Information in our quarterly financial supplements is not incorporated by reference into this report.
Key Risk Characteristics of Multifamily Business Volume and Guaranty Book of Business
Multifamily Business Volume at
Acquisition (1)
For the Year Ended December 31,
Multifamily Guaranty Book of Business (2)
As of December 31,
LTV ratio:
Weighted-average original LTV
ratio
%
%
%
%
%
%
DSCR:
Weighted-average DSCR (3)
1.6
1.6
1.9
2.0
2.0
2.2
Current DSCR below 1.0 (3)
-
-
-
%
%
%
Loan amount and count:
Average loan amount (in millions)
$ 21
$ 19
$ 19
$ 17
$ 16
$ 16
Loan count
2,602
2,812
3,572
29,651
28,926
28,023
Interest rate type:
Fixed interest rate
%
%
%
%
%
%
Adjustable interest rate
*
Total
%
%
%
%
%
%
Amortization type:
Full interest-only
%
%
%
%
%
%
Partial interest-only (4)
Fully amortizing
Total
%
%
%
%
%
%
Asset class type:
Conventional/co-op
%
%
%
%
%
%
Seniors housing
Student housing
Manufactured housing
Total
%
%
%
%
%
%
Affordable (5)
%
%
%
%
%
%
Small balance loans (based on loan
count) (6)
%
%
%
%
%
%
Geographic concentration: (7)
Midwest
%
%
%
%
%
%
Northeast
Southeast
Southwest
West
Total
%
%
%
%
%
%
* Represents less than 0.5% of multifamily business volume or guaranty book of business.
(1) Calculated based on the unpaid principal balance of multifamily loans for each category at time of acquisition, excluding small balance
loans which is calculated based on loan count rather than unpaid principal balance.
(2) Calculated based on the aggregate unpaid principal balance of multifamily loans for each category divided by the aggregate unpaid
principal balance of loans in our multifamily guaranty book of business as of the end of each period, excluding small balance loans which is
calculated based on loan count rather than unpaid principal balance.
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
MD&A | Multifamily Business | Multifamily Mortgage Credit Risk Management
(3) For our business volumes, the DSCR is calculated using the actual debt service payments for the loan. For our book of business, our
estimates of current DSCRs are based on the latest available income information covering a 12-month period, from quarterly and annual
statements for these properties including the related debt service. When an annual statement is the latest statement available, it is used.
When operating statement information is not available, the underwritten DSCR is used. Co-op loans are excluded from this metric.
(4) Consists of mortgage loans that were underwritten with a partial interest-only term, regardless of whether the loan is currently in its
interest-only period.
(5) Represents Multifamily Affordable Housing (“MAH”) loans, which are defined as financing for properties that are under an agreement that
provides long-term affordability, such as properties with rent subsidies or income restrictions. MAH loans are included within the asset
class categories referenced above.
(6) Smal l balance loans refer to multifamily loans with an original unpaid principal balance of up to $9 million. Small balance loans are included
within the asset class categories referenced above. We present this metric in the table based on loan count rather than unpaid principal
balance. Small balance loans comprised 10% , 11% and 11% of our multifamily guaranty book of business as of December 31, 2024 , 2023
and 2022 , respectively, based on unpaid principal balance of the loan.
(7) Midwest consists of IL, IN, IA, MI, MN, NE, ND, OH, SD and WI. Northeast consists of CT, DE, ME, MA, NH, NJ, NY, PA, PR, RI, VT and
VI. Southeast consists of AL, DC, FL, GA, KY, MD, MS, NC, SC, TN, VA and WV. Southwest consists of AZ, AR, CO, KS, LA, MO, NM, OK,
TX and UT. West consists of AK, CA, GU, HI, ID, MT, NV, OR, WA and WY.
Multifamily Transfer of Mortgage Credit Risk
Overview
Lender risk-sharing is a cornerstone of our Multifamily business. We primarily transfer risk through our DUS program,
which is described under “ Multifamily Primary Business Activities - Delegated Underwriting and Servicing Program .” To
complement our DUS front-end lender-risk sharing program, we also engage in back-end credit risk transfer
transactions through our MCIRT and MCAS programs.
Front-End Credit Risk Sharing
Our DUS model is designed to transfer approximately one-third of the credit risk on our multifamily loans to lenders,
either on a pro-rated or tiered basis, but the amount of credit loss shared in any given transaction may vary. Lenders
who share on a tiered basis typically absorb losses on the first 5% of the unpaid principal balance of a loan at the time
of loss settlement, and above 5% share a percentage of the loss with us, with the maximum loss capped at 20% of the
original unpaid principal balance of the loan. Among our DUS network, bank lenders tend to use pro-rated loss sharing,
as it results in more favorable regulatory capital requirements for them, while non-depository lenders vary based on
preference.
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
MD&A | Multifamily Business | Multifamily Mortgage Credit Risk Management
The chart below displays the percentage of credit risk retained by Fannie Mae or transferred to third parties under our
typical DUS lender risk-sharing arrangements. As of December 31, 2024 , 43% of our multifamily guaranty book of
business was covered by tiered loss sharing and 56% was covered by pro-rated loss sharing. As of December 31, 2023 ,
42% of our multifamily guaranty book of business was covered by tiered loss sharing and 57% was covered by pro-
rated loss sharing.
Principal Types of Multifamily DUS Loss Sharing
Tiered
100% of UPB
Pro-rated
90%
10%
2/3
1/3
25% of
UPB
75%
25%
5% of
UPB
100%
Fannie Mae
DUS Lender
In certain situations, lenders may assume a smaller portion of the credit risk. We establish lender-specific loss-sharing
limits for individual transactions based on loan size, lender financial performance, and lender creditworthiness, among
other factors. When loss sharing is reduced on a loan, the servicing fee paid to the lender is reduced and our guaranty
fee is increased to reflect the lower credit risk retained by the lender.
Non-DUS lenders, which represent a small portion of our multifamily guaranty book of business, typically share or
absorb losses based on a negotiated percentage of the loan or the pool balance. As a result of our lender risk-sharing
agreements, our maximum potential loss recovery from both DUS and non-DUS loans represented approximately 24%
of the unpaid principal balance of our multifamily guaranty book of business as of December 31, 2024 and December
31, 2023 .
Back-End Credit Risk Sharing
Our back-end MCAS and MCIRT credit risk transfer programs transfer a portion of the credit risk associated with a
reference pool of multifamily mortgage loans to insurers, reinsurers, or investors. These credit-risk sharing transactions
were primarily designed to further reduce the capital requirements associated with loans in the reference pool, which
reflects the benefit of additional credit risk protection in the event of a stress environment. While we transfer multifamily
credit risk through front-end lender risk-sharing at the time of acquisition, our multifamily back-end credit risk transfer
activity occurs later, sometimes a year or more after acquisition.
In 2024 , we entered into three new multifamily credit risk transfer transactions, transferring mortgage credit risk through
our MCIRT and MCAS programs. When engaging in multifamily credit risk transfer transactions, we consider their cost,
the resulting capital relief, and the overall credit risk appetite of the market. The cost of our credit risk transfer
transactions is impacted by macroeconomic conditions and housing market sentiment, as well as the demand and
capacity of the investors and reinsurers that support these transactions.
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
MD&A | Multifamily Business | Multifamily Mortgage Credit Risk Management
The table below displays the total unpaid principal balance of multifamily loans and the percentage of our multifamily
guaranty book of business, based on unpaid principal balance, that is covered by a back-end credit risk transfer
transaction. The table does not reflect front-end lender risk-sharing arrangements, as only a small portion of our
multifamily guaranty book of business is not covered by these arrangements.
Multifamily Loans in Back-End Credit Risk Transfer Transactions
As of December 31,
Unpaid
Principal
Balance
Percentage of
Multifamily
Guaranty Book
of Business
Unpaid
Principal
Balance
Percentage of
Multifamily
Guaranty Book
of Business
(Dollars in millions)
MCIRT
$ 101,181
20 %
$ 89,517
19 %
MCAS
56,142
48,476
Total
$ 157,323
31 %
$ 137,993
29 %
Multifamily Problem Loan Management
We employ proactive management and monitoring of our multifamily guaranty book, which are designed to mitigate
losses and delinquencies on our multifamily guaranty book of business.
Credit Performance Statistics on Multifamily Problem Loans
The percentage of loans in our multifamily guaranty book of business that were criticized was 7% a s of both December
31, 2024 and December 31, 2023 . Our criticized loan population remains elevated, largely driven by properties financed
with adjustable-rate mortgages. The criticized loans category substantially consists of loans classified as “Substandard”
and also includes loans classified as “Special Mention” or “Doubtful.” Substandard loans are loans that have a well-
defined weakness that could impact their timely full repayment. While the majority of the substandard loans in our
multifamily guaranty book of business are currently making timely payments, we continue to monitor the performance of
our substandard loan population. For more information on our credit quality indicators, including our population of
substandard loans, see “ Note 4, Mortgage Loans .”
Our multifamily serious delinquency rate increased to 0.57% as of December 31, 2024 , compared with 0.46% as of
December 31, 2023 , primarily due to a portfolio of approximately $600 million of adjustable-rate conventional loans that
became seriously delinquent in the third quarter of 2024 . Approximately 21% of our seriously delinquent multifamily loan
population as of December 31, 2024 was comprised of seniors housing loans and the serious delinquency rate of our
seniors housing loans was 4.21% as of December 31, 2024 . Our multifamily serious delinquency rate consists of
multifamily loans that were 60 days or more past due based on unpaid principal balance, expressed as a percentage of
our multifamily guaranty book of business.
Management monitors the multifamily serious delinquency rate as an indicator of potential future credit losses and loss
mitigation activities. Typically, higher serious delinquency rates result in a higher allowance for loan losses . Serious
delinquency rates are reflective of our performance in assessing and managing credit risk associated with multifamily
loans in our guaranty book of business. The percentage of loans in our multifamily guaranty book of business that were
180 days or more delinquent was 0.44% as of December 31, 2024 compared with 0.29% as of December 31, 2023 .
In addition to the credit performance information on our multifamily loans provided in this report, we provide additional
information about the performance of our multifamily loans that back MBS and whole loan REMICs in the “Data
Collections” section of our DUS Disclose ® tool, available at www.fanniemae.com/dusdisclose. Information on our
website is not incorporated into this report. Information in Data Collections may differ from similar measures presented
in our financial statements and other public disclosures for a variety of reasons, including as a result of variations in the
loan population covered, timing differences in reporting and other factors.
Multifamily REO Management
As of December 31, 2024 , we held 139 multifamily REO properties with a carrying value of $638 million , compared with
61 properties with a carrying value of $378 million as of December 31, 2023 . The increase in foreclosure activity was
primarily driven by properties included in a specific seniors housing portfolio that had write-offs during 2023. A majority
of properties in this portfolio have completed the foreclosure or sale process as of December 31, 2024 ; however, we
expect the foreclosure process to take longer for properties in the portfolio that are located in certain judicial foreclosure
states with historically long foreclosure timelines.
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
MD&A | Multifamily Business | Multifamily Mortgage Credit Risk Management
Multifamily Credit Loss Performance Metrics
The amount of multifamily credit losses or gains we realize in a given period is driven by foreclosures, pre-foreclosure
sales, post-foreclosure REO activity and other events that trigger write-offs and recoveries. Our multifamily credit loss
performance metrics are not defined terms and may not be calculated in the same manner as similarly titled measures
reported by other companies . For the purposes of our multifamily credit loss performance metrics, credit losses or gains
represent write-offs net of recoveries and foreclosed property income or expense. We believe our multifamily credit
losses, and our multifamily credit losses net of freestanding loss-sharing arrangements, provide useful information about
our multifamily credit performance because they display our multifamily credit losses in the context of our multifamily
guaranty book of business, including changes to the benefit we expect to receive from loss-sharing arrangements.
Management views multifamily credit losses, net of freestanding loss-sharing arrangements, as a key metric related to
our multifamily business model and our strategy to share multifamily credit risk.
The table below displays the components of our multifamily credit loss performance metrics, as well as our multifamily
initial write-off severity rate and write-off loan count.
Multifamily Credit Loss Performance Metrics
For the Year Ended December 31,
(Dollars in millions)
Write-offs (1)
$ (505)
$ (401)
$ (43)
Recoveries
Foreclosed property income (expense)
(234)
(174)
(40)
Credit gains (losses)
(653)
(516)
(60)
Change in expected benefits from freestanding loss-sharing
arrangements (2)
(2)
Credit gains (losses), net of freestanding loss-sharing
arrangements
$ (505)
$ (475)
$ (62)
Credit gain (loss) ratio (in bps) (3)
(13.5)
(11.3)
(1.4)
Credit gain (loss) ratio, net of freestanding loss-sharing
arrangements (in bps) (2)(3)
(10.5)
(10.4)
(1.5)
Multifamily initial write-off severity rate on liquidated loans (4)(5)
%
%
%
Multifamily write-off loan count on liquidated loans (6)
(1) Represents write-offs when a loan is determined to be uncollectible prior to a liquidation event, which includes foreclosure, a deed-in-lieu of
foreclosure or a short-sale (collectively a “liquidation event”), as well as write-offs at liquidation . Write-offs associated with non-REO sales
are net of loss sharing.
(2) Represents changes to the benefit we expect to receive only from write-offs as a result of certain freestanding loss-sharing arrangements,
primarily multifamily DUS lender risk-sharing transactions. Changes to the expected benefits we will receive are recorded in “ Change in
expected credit enhancement recoveries ” in our consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income.
(3) Calculated based on the amount of “Credit gains (losses)” and “Credit gains (losses), net of freestanding loss-sharing arrangements,”
divided by the average multifamily guaranty book of business during the period.
(4) Rate is calculated as the initial write-off amount divided by t he written-off unpai d principal bala nce.
(5) Based on write-offs associated with a liquidation event. The rate excludes any costs, gains or losses associated with REO after initial
acquisition through final disposition. The rate also excludes write-offs when a loan is determined to be uncollectible prior to a liquidation
event. Write-offs are net of lender loss-sharing agreements.
(6) Represents the number of loans that experienced write-offs associated with a liquidation event during the period.
Our multifamily credit losses in 2024 were primarily driven by write-offs of adjustable-rate conventional loans that
became seriously delinquent during the third quarter of 2024 as well as foreclosed property expenses. See “Multifamily
Problem Loan Management” for additional information.
Our multifamily credit losses in 2023 were primarily driven by the write-off of $300 million related to a seniors housing
portfolio as well as foreclosed property expenses .
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
MD&A | Multifamily Business | Multifamily Mortgage Credit Risk Management
Multifamily Maturity Information
The below table shows the contractual maturities and interest rate sensitivities of our multifamily mortgage loan portfolio
as recorded on our consolidated balance sheets. Although loans in our consolidated portfolio have varying contractual
terms, the actual life of the loans may be less than their contractual term as a result of prepayment.
Multifamily Loans: Maturities and Terms of the Consolidated Mortgage Loan Portfolio (1)
As of December 31, 2024
Due within 1
year
Greater than 1
year but
within 5 years
Greater than 5
years but
within 15
years
Greater than
15 years
Total
(Dollars in millions)
Multifamily mortgage loan portfolio: (2)
Loans held for investment:
Of Fannie Mae
$ 535
$ 1,670
$ 1,326
$ 20
$ 3,551
Of consolidated trusts
16,066
193,443
272,485
5,681
487,675
Total unpaid principal balance of
multifamily mortgage loans
16,601
195,113
273,811
5,701
491,226
Cost basis adjustments, net
(2,531)
Total multifamily mortgage loans (2)
$ 16,601
$ 195,113
$ 273,811
$ 5,701
$ 488,695
Multifamily mortgage loan portfolio by interest rate sensitivity:
Fixed-rate
$ 14,782
$ 181,486
$ 257,732
$ 5,584
$ 459,584
Adjustable-rate
1,819
13,627
16,079
31,642
Total unpaid principal balance of
multifamily mortgage loans
$ 16,601
$ 195,113
$ 273,811
$ 5,701
$ 491,226
(1) We report the scheduled repayments in the maturity category in which the payment is due, such that a loan’s balance may be presented
across multiple maturity categories.
(2) Excludes accrued interest receivable. The unpaid principal balance of multifamily loans is based on the amount of contractual unpaid
principal balance due and excludes any write-offs for amounts deemed uncollectible. Those write-offs are presented as a component of
cost basis adjustments, net.
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
MD&A | Consolidated Credit Ratios and Select Credit Information
Consolidated Credit Ratios and Select Credit Information
The table below displays select credit ratios on our single-family conventional guaranty book of business and our
multifamily guaranty book of business, as well as the inputs used in calculating these ratios.
Consolidated Credit Ratios and Select Credit Information
As of
December 31, 2024
December 31, 2023
Single-family
Multifamily
Consolidated
Total
Single-family
Multifamily
Consolidated
Total
(Dollars in millions)
Credit loss reserves as a
percentage of:
Guaranty book of business
0.15
%
0.48
%
0.19
%
0.18
%
0.44
%
0.21
%
Nonaccrual loans at amortized
cost
19.95
95.27
26.43
28.50
109.21
34.51
Nonaccrual loans as a
percentage of:
Guaranty book of business
0.74
%
0.50
%
0.71
%
0.65
%
0.40
%
0.62
%
Select financial information used
in calculating credit ratios:
Credit loss reserves (1)
$ (5,332)
$ (2,398)
$ (7,730)
$ (6,696)
$ (2,064)
$ (8,760)
Guaranty book of business (2)
3,617,267
499,652
4,116,919
3,636,735
470,398
4,107,133
Nonaccrual loans at amortized
cost
26,728
2,517
29,245
23,497
1,890
25,387
(1) Credit loss reserves are comprised of our allowance for loan losses, allowance for accrued interest receivable, and reserve for guaranty
losses. Reserve for guaranty losses is recorded in “Other liabilities” in our consolidated balance sheets. Our multifamily credit loss
reserves exclude the expected benefit of freestanding credit enhancements on multifamily loans of $844 million as of December 31, 2024
and $599 million as of December 31, 2023 , which are recorded in “Other assets” in our consolidated balance sheets.
(2) Guaranty book of business is as of period end. For single-family, represents the conventional guaranty book of business.
Our credit loss reserves decreased as of December 31, 2024 compared with December 31, 2023 primarily as a result of
a benefit for credit losses, which reduced our allowance for loan losses, as we describe in “ Consolidated Results of
Operations - Benefit (Provision) for Credit Losses .”
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
MD&A | Consolidated Credit Ratios and Select Credit Information
Consolidated Write-off Ratio and Select Credit Information
For the Year Ended December 31,
Single-
family
Multifamily
Total
Single-
family
Multifamily
Total
Single-
family
Multifamily
Total
(Dollars in millions)
Select credit ratio:
Write-offs, net of
recoveries, as a
percentage of the
average guaranty
book of business
(in bps)
1.3
8.7
2.2
1.8
7.5
2.5
1.7
0.5
1.6
Select financial
information used
in calculating
credit ratio:
Write-offs (1)
$ 728
$ 505
$ 1,233
$ 881
$ 401
$ 1,282
$ 890
$ 43
$ 933
Recoveries
(258)
(86)
(344)
(210)
(59)
(269)
(288)
(23)
(311)
Write-offs, net of
recoveries
$ 470
$ 419
$ 889
$ 671
$ 342
$ 1,013
$ 602
$ 20
$ 622
Average guaranty
book of
business (2)
$ 3,626,208
$ 482,541
$ 4,108,749
$ 3,634,426
$ 455,137
$ 4,089,563
$ 3,585,714
$ 425,695
$ 4,011,409
(1) Represents write-offs when a loan is determined to be uncollectible. For single-family, also includes any write-offs upon the redesignation
of mortgage loans from HFI to HFS.
(2) Average guaranty book of business is based on the average of quarter-end balances.
Liquidity and Capital Management
Liquidity Management
Our business activities require that we maintain adequate liquidity to fund our operations. Our liquidity risk management
requirements are designed to address our liquidity risk, which is the risk that we will not be able to meet our obligations
when they come due, including the risk associated with the inability to access funding sources or manage fluctuations in
funding levels. Liquidity risk management involves forecasting funding requirements, maintaining sufficient funding
capacity to meet our needs based on our ongoing assessment of financial market liquidity and adhering to our
regulatory requirements.
Primary Sources and Uses of Funds
Our liquidity depends largely on our ability to issue debt in the capital markets, including both corporate debt and sales
of our MBS securities. We believe that our status as a government-sponsored enterprise and continued federal
government support are essential to maintaining our access to the debt markets. Substantially all of our sources and
uses of funds identified below are both short-term and long-term in nature.
Our primary sources of cash include:
• issuance of long-term and short-term corporate debt;
• proceeds from the sale of mortgage-related securities, mortgage loans, corporate liquidity portfolio assets, and
REO assets;
• principal and interest payments received on mortgage loans, mortgage-related securities and non-mortgage
investments we own;
• guaranty fees received on Fannie Mae MBS, including the TCCA fees collected by us on behalf of Treasury ;
• payments received from mortgage insurance counterparties and other providers of credit enhancement; and
• borrowings we may make under a secured intraday funding line of credit or against mortgage-related securities
and other investment securities we hold pursuant to repurchase agreements and loan agreements.
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
MD&A | Liquidity and Capital Management
Our primary uses of funds include:
• the repayment of matured, redeemed and repurchased debt;
• the purchase of mortgage loans (including delinquent loans from MBS trusts), mortgage-related securities and
other investments;
• interest payments on outstanding debt;
• administrative expenses;
• losses, including advances for past due principal and interest, incurred in connection with our Fannie Mae MBS
guaranty obligations;
• payments of federal income taxes;
• payments of TCCA fees to Treasury ; and
• payments associated with our credit risk transfer program expenses.
Liquidity Risk Management Practices and Contingency Planning
Many factors, both internal and external to our business, could influence our debt activity, affect the amount, mix and
cost of our debt funding, reduce demand for our debt securities, increase our liquidity or roll over risk, or otherwise have
a material adverse impact on our liquidity position, including:
• changes or perceived changes in federal government support of our business or our debt securities;
• changes in or the elimination of our status as a government-sponsored enterprise;
• changes by investors in how they view our debt or regulatory changes causing our debt to no longer be
considered a high-quality liquid asset;
• actions taken by FHFA, the Federal Reserve, Treasury or other government agencies;
• legislation relating to us or our business;
• a change or perceived change in the creditworthiness of the U.S. government, due to our reliance on the U.S.
government’s support;
• a U.S. government payment default on its debt obligations;
• a downgrade in the credit ratings of our senior unsecured debt or the U.S. government’s debt from the major
ratings organizations;
• future changes or disruptions in the financial markets;
• a systemic event leading to the withdrawal of liquidity from the market;
• an extreme market-wide widening of credit spreads;
• public statements by key policy makers;
• a significant decline in our net worth;
• potential investor concerns about the adequacy of funding available to us under or about changes to the senior
preferred stock purchase agreement;
• loss of demand for our debt, or certain types of our debt, from a significant number of investors;
• a significant credit or operational (including cybersecurity) event involving us or one of our major institutional
counterparties; or
• a sudden catastrophic operational failure in the financial sector.
See “Risk Factors” for a discussion of the risks we face relating to:
• the uncertain future of our company;
• our reliance on the issuance of debt securities to obtain funds for our operations and the relative cost to obtain
these funds;
• our liquidity contingency plans;
• our credit ratings; and
• other factors that could adversely affect our ability to obtain adequate debt funding or otherwise negatively
impact our liquidity, including the factors listed above.
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
MD&A | Liquidity and Capital Management
Also see “ Business - Conservatorship and Treasury Agreements - Treasury Agreements .”
We maintain a liquidity management framework and conduct liquidity contingency planning to prepare for an event in
which our access to the unsecured debt markets becomes limited.
Our liquidity requirements established by FHFA have four components we must meet:
• a short-term cash flow metric that requires us to meet our expected cash outflows and continue to provide
liquidity to the market over a 30-day period of stress, plus an additional $10 billion buffer;
• an intermediate cash flow metric that requires us to meet our expected cash outflows and continue to provide
liquidity to the market over a 365-day period of stress;
• a specified minimum long-term debt to less-liquid asset ratio. Less-liquid assets are those that are not eligible
to be pledged as collateral to Fixed Income Clearing Corporation; and
• a requirement that we fund our assets with liabilities that have a specified minimum term relative to the term of
the assets.
As of December 31, 2024 , we wer e in compliance with these requirements.
We execute operational testing of our ability to rely upon our U.S. Treasury collateral to obtain financing. We enter into
relatively small repurchase agreements to confirm that we have the operational and systems capability to do so. In
addition, we have positioned collateral in advance to clearing banks in the event we seek to enter into repurchase
agreements in the future. We do not, however, have committed repurchase agreements with specific counterparties, as
historically we have not relied on this form of funding. As a result, our use of such facilities and our ability to enter into
them in significant dollar amounts may be challenging in a stressed market environment. See “ Corporate Liquidity
Portfolio ” for further discussions of our alternative sources of liquidity if our access to the debt markets were to become
limited.
While our liquidity contingency planning attempts to address stressed market conditions and our status in
conservatorship, we believe accessing all liquidity sources in those plans could be difficult or impossible to execute
under stressed conditions for a company of our size in our circumstances. See “ Risk Factors - Liquidity Risk ” for a
description of the risks associated with our ability to fund operations and our liquidity contingency planning.
Debt Funding
We separately present the debt from consolidations (“Debt of consolidated trusts”) and the debt issued by us (“Debt of
Fannie Mae”) in our consolidated balance sheets. This discussion regarding debt funding focuses on the debt of Fannie
Mae. We primarily fund our business through MBS issuances, retained earnings, and the issuance of a variety of short-
term and long-term debt securities in the domestic and international capital markets. Accordingly, we are subject to “roll
over,” or refinancing, risk on our outstanding debt.
Our debt securities are actively traded in the over-the-counter market. We have a diversified funding base of domestic
and international investors. Purchasers of our debt securities are geographically diversified and include fund managers,
commercial banks, pension funds, insurance companies, foreign central banks, corporations, state and local
governments, and other municipal authorities. We compete for low-cost debt funding with institutions that hold mortgage
portfolios, including Freddie Mac and the FHLBs.
Our debt funding needs and debt funding activity may vary from period to period depending on market conditions,
including refinance volumes, our capital and liquidity management, and the size of our retained mortgage portfolio. See
“ Retained Mortgage Portfolio ” for information about our retained mortgage portfolio and limits on its size.
The unpaid principal balance of our aggregate indebtedness was $143.1 billion as of December 31, 2024 . Pursuant to
the terms of the senior preferred stock purchase agreement, we are prohibited from issuing debt without the prior
consent of Treasury if it would result in our aggregate indebtedness exceeding our outstanding debt limit, which is set to
$270 billion. The calculation of our indebtedness for purposes of complying with our debt limit reflects the unpaid
principal balance and excludes debt basis adjustments and debt of consolidated trusts.
Outstanding Debt
Total outstanding debt of Fannie Mae includes short-term and long-term debt and excludes debt of consolidated trusts.
Short-term debt of Fannie Mae consists of borrowings with an original contractual maturity of one year or less and,
therefore, does not include the current portion of long-term debt. Long-term debt of Fannie Mae consists of borrowings
with an original contractual maturity of greater than one year.
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
MD&A | Liquidity and Capital Management
The following chart and table display information on our outstanding short-term and long-term debt based on original
contractual maturity. Our total debt increased in 2024 , primarily due to higher long-term debt issuances compared to
2023 . W e issued additional long-term debt to enhance our liquidity position, taking advantage of favorable market
conditions.
Debt of Fannie Mae 1
(Dollars in billions)
Short-term debt
Long-term debt maturing within one year
Long-term debt, excluding portion maturing within one year
(1) Outstanding debt balance consists of the unpaid principal balance, premiums and discounts, fair value adjustments, hedge-related basis
adjustments and other cost basis adjustments. Reported amounts include net discount unamortized cost basis adjustments and fair value
adjustments of $3.7 billion and $4.0 billion as of December 31, 2024 and 2023 , respectively.
Selected Debt Information
As of December 31,
(Dollars in billions)
Selected Weighted-Average Interest Rates (1)
Interest rate on short-term debt
4.33 %
5.13 %
Interest rate on long-term debt, including portion maturing within one year
3.30
2.63
Interest rate on callable debt
2.83
2.41
Selected Maturity Data
Weighted-average maturity of debt maturing within one year (in days)
Weighted-average maturity of debt maturing in more than one year (in months)
Other Data
Outstanding callable debt (2)
$ 41.0
$ 43.8
Connecticut Avenue Securities debt (3)
2.1
2.8
(1) Excludes the effects of fair value adjustments and hedge-related basis adjustments.
(2) Includes short-term callable debt of $95 million and $2.6 billion as of December 31, 2024 and 2023 , respectively.
(3) Represents CAS debt issued prior to November 2018. See “ Single-Family Business - Single-Family Mortgage Credit Risk Management -
Single-Family Credit Enhancement and Transfer of Mortgage Credit Risk - Credit Risk Transfer Transactions ” for information regarding our
Connecticut Avenue Securities.
We intend to repay our short-term and long-term debt obligations as they become due primarily through cash from
business operations, the sale of assets in our corporate liquidity portfolio and the issuance of additional debt securities.
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
MD&A | Liquidity and Capital Management
For information on the maturity profile of our outstanding long-term debt for each of the years 2025 through 2029 and
thereafter, see “ Note 8, Short-Term and Long-Term Debt .”
Debt Funding Activity
The table below displays activity in debt of Fannie Mae. This activity excludes the debt of consolidated trusts and
intraday borrowing. The reported amounts of debt issued and paid off during each period represent the face amount of
the debt at issuance and redemption.
Activity in Debt of Fannie Mae
For the Year Ended December 31,
(Dollars in millions)
Issued during the period:
Short-term:
Amount
$ 259,586
$ 227,787
$ 137,310
Weighted-average interest rate (1)
5.06 %
4.86 %
1.56 %
Long-term: (2)
Amount
$ 49,422
$ 8,636
$ 1,961
Weighted-average interest rate
4.90 %
5.27 %
3.54 %
Total issued:
Amount
$ 309,008
$ 236,423
$ 139,271
Weighted-average interest rate
5.03 %
4.87 %
1.59 %
Paid off during the period: (3)
Short-term:
Amount
$ 265,743
$ 220,645
$ 129,877
Weighted-average interest rate (1)
4.57 %
4.18 %
1.26 %
Long-term: (2)
Amount
$ 28,294
$ 26,918
$ 72,570
Weighted-average interest rate
3.09 %
1.65 %
1.35 %
Total paid off:
Amount
$ 294,037
$ 247,563
$ 202,447
Weighted-average interest rate
4.43 %
3.91 %
1.29 %
(1) Includes interest generated from negative interest rates on certain repurchase agreements, which offset our short-term funding costs.
(2) Includes credit risk-sharing securities issued as CAS debt prior to November 2018. For information on our credit risk transfer transactions,
see “ Single-Family Business - Single-Family Mortgage Credit Risk Management - Single-Family Credit Enhancement and Transfer of
Mortgage Credit Risk - Credit Risk Transfer Transactions .”
(3) Consists of all payments on debt, including regularly scheduled principal payments, payments at maturity, payments resulting from calls
and payments for any other repurchases. Repurchases of debt and early retirements of zero-coupon debt are reported at original face
value, which does not equal the amount of actual cash payment.
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
MD&A | Liquidity and Capital Management
Corporate Liquidity Portfolio
The chart below displays information on the composition of our corporate liquidity portfolio. The balance and
composition of our corporate liquidity portfolio fluctuates as a result of changes in our cash flows, liquidity in the fixed-
income markets, and our liquidity risk management framework and practices. O ur corporate liquidity portfolio increased
in 2024 , primarily due to investing the proceeds of debt issued during the second half of 2024 in U.S. Treasury
securities.
Corporate Liquidity Portfolio
(Dollars in billions)
(1) Cash equivalents are composed of overnight reverse repurchase agreements and U.S. Treasuries that have a maturity at the date of
acquisition of three months or less.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We enter into certain business arrangements to facilitate our statutory purpose of providing liquidity to the secondary
mortgage market and to reduce our exposure to interest rate fluctuations. Some of these arrangements are not
recorded in our consolidated balance sheets or may be recorded in amounts different from the full contract or notional
amount of the transaction, depending on the nature or structure of, and the accounting required to be applied to, the
arrangement. These arrangements are commonly referred to as “off-balance sheet arrangements” and expose us to
potential losses in excess of the amounts recorded in our consolidated balance sheets.
Our off-balance sheet arrangements result primarily from the following:
• our guaranty of mortgage loan securitization and resecuritization transactions over which we have no control,
which are reflected in our unconsolidated Fannie Mae MBS net of any beneficial ownership interest we retain,
and other financial guarantees that we do not control;
• liquidity support transactions; and
• partnership interests.
The total amount of our off-balance sheet exposure related to unconsolidated Fannie Mae MBS net of any beneficial
interest that we retain, and other financial guarantees was $211.5 billion as of December 31, 2024 and $227.5 billion as
of December 31, 2023 . The majority of the other financial guarantees consists of Freddie Mac securities backing Fannie
Mae structured securities. See “ Guaranty Book of Business ” and “ Note 7, Financial Guarantees ” for more information
regarding our maximum exposure to loss on unconsolidated Fannie Mae MBS and Freddie Mac securities.
Our total outstanding liquidity commitments to advance funds for securities backed by multifamily housing revenue
bonds totaled $4.3 billion as of December 31, 2024 and $4.5 billion as of December 31, 2023 . These commitments
require us to advance funds to third parties that enable them to repurchase tendered bonds or securities that are unable
to be remarketed.
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
MD&A | Liquidity and Capital Management
We have investments in various limited partnerships and similar legal entities, which consist of LIHTC investments,
community investments and investments in other entities. When we do not have a controlling financial interest in those
entities, our consolidated balance sheets reflect only our investment rather than the full amount of the partnership’s
assets and liabilities. See “ Note 3, Consolidations and Transfers of Financial Assets - Unconsolidated VIEs ” for
information regarding our investments in limited partnerships and similar legal entities.
Equity Funding
At this time, as a result of the covenants under the senior preferred stock purchase agreement, Treasury’s ownership of
the warrant to purchase up to 79.9% of the total shares of our common stock outstanding and the uncertainty regarding
our future, we do not have access to equity funding except through draws under the senior preferred stock purchase
agreement. For a description of the funding available and the covenants under the senior preferred stock purchase
agreement, see “ Business - Conservatorship and Treasury Agreements - Treasury Agreements .”
Contractual Obligations
We have contractual obligations that affect our liquidity and capital resource requirements. These contractual obligations
primarily consist of debt obligations (and associated interest payment obligations) and mortgage purchase commitments
recognized on our consolidated balance sheet.
• For information about the amounts, maturities and contractual interest rates of our obligations related to debt,
see “ Note 8, Short-Term and Long-Term Debt .”
• For information about our mortgage purchase commitments, leases and other purchase obligations, see “ Note
17, Commitments and Contingencies .”
Our contractual obligations also include $2.3 billion in cash received as collateral, unrecognized tax benefits, and future
cash payments due under our unconditional and legally binding obligations to fund LIHTC partnership investments and
other partnerships. These amounts are recognized on our consolidated balance sheets under “Other liabilities.”
In addition, our short- and long-term liquidity and capital resource needs may be affected by our contractual obligations
to make the payments listed below. The amounts of these payments are uncertain and will depend on future events:
• payments on our obligations to stand ready to perform under our guarantees relating to Fannie Mae MBS and
other financial guarantees, including Fannie Mae commingled structured securities. The amount and timing of
payments under these arrangements are generally contingent upon the occurrence of future events. For a
description of the amount of our on- and off-balance sheet Fannie Mae MBS and other financial guarantees as
of December 31, 2024 , see “ Guaranty Book of Business ” and “ Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements ;”
• payments associated with our CIRT, CAS REMIC, MCAS, and Connecticut Avenue Securities Credit-Linked
Notes transactions, the amount and timing of which are contingent upon the occurrence of future credit and
prepayment events for the related reference pool of mortgage loans. For more information on these
transactions, see “ Single-Family Business - Single-Family Mortgage Credit Risk Management - Single-Family
Credit Enhancement and Transfer of Mortgage Credit Risk - Credit Risk Transfer Transactions ” and “ Multifamily
Business - Multifamily Mortgage Credit Risk Management - Multifamily Transfer of Mortgage Credit Risk ;” and
• payments related to our interest-rate risk management derivatives that may require cash settlement in future
periods, the amount and timing of which depend on changes in interest rates. For more information on these
transactions, see “ Note 9, Derivative Instruments .”
Credit Ratings
Our credit ratings from the major credit ratings organizations, as well as the credit ratings of the U.S. government, are
primary factors that could affect our ability to access the capital markets and our cost of funds. In addition, our credit
ratings are important when we seek to engage in certain long-term transactions, such as derivative transactions. S&P,
Moody’s and Fitch have all indicated that, if they were to lower the sovereign credit ratings on the U.S., they would likely
lower their ratings on the debt of Fannie Mae and certain other government-related entities. In addition, actions by
governmental entities impacting Treasury’s support for our business or our debt securities could adversely affect the
credit ratings of our senior unsecured debt. See “ Risk Factors - Liquidity Risk ” for a discussion of the risks to our
business relating to a decrease in our credit ratings.
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
MD&A | Liquidity and Capital Management
The table below displays the credit ratings issued by the three major credit rating agencies.
Fannie Mae Credit Ratings
As of December 31, 2024
S&P
Moody’s
Fitch
Long-term senior debt
AA+
Aaa
AA+
Short-term senior debt
A-1+
P-1
+
Preferred stock
D
Ca(hyb)
C/RR6
Outlook
Stable
Negative
Stable
Cash Flows
Year Ended December 31, 2024 . Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash and cash equivalents increased from
$68.7 billion as of December 31, 2023 to $78.8 billion as of December 31, 2024 . The increase was primarily driven by
cash inflows from (1) proceeds from repayments of loans, (2) the sale of Fannie Mae MBS to third parties, (3) issuances
of funding debt, which outpaced redemptions, and (4) investments in securities purchased under agreements to resell.
Partially offsetting these cash inflows were cash outflows primarily from (1) payments on outstanding debt of
consolidated trusts, (2) purchases of loans acquired as held for investment, and (3) advances to lenders.
Year Ended December 31, 2023 . Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash and cash equivalents decreased from
$87.8 billion as of December 31, 2022 to $68.7 billion as of December 31, 2023 . The decrease was primarily driven by
cash outflows from (1) payments on outstanding debt of consolidated trusts, (2) purchases of loans acquired as held for
investment, and (3) advances to lenders.
Partially offsetting these cash outflows were cash inflows primarily from (1) proceeds from repayments of loans and (2)
the sale of Fannie Mae MBS to third parties.
Capital Management
Capital Requirements
For a description of our capital requirements under the enterprise regulatory capital framework, see “ Business -
Legislation and Regulation - Capital Requirements .” Although the enterprise regulatory capital framework went into
effect in February 2021, we are not required to hold capital according to the framework’s requirements until the date of
termination of our conservatorship, or such later date as may be ordered by FHFA.
The table below sets forth information about our capital requirements under the standardized approach of the enterprise
regulatory capital framework. Available capital for purposes of the enterprise regulatory capital framework excludes the
stated value of the senior preferred stock ( $120.8 billion ) and other amounts specified in the Regulatory Capital
Components table below. Because of these exclusions, we had a deficit in available capital as of December 31, 2024
even though we had positive net worth under GAAP of $94.7 billion as of December 31, 2024 .
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
MD&A | Liquidity and Capital Management
As of December 31, 2024 , w e had a $227 billion shortfall to our risk-based adjusted total capital requirement, including
buffers, of $190 billion , as we had an available capital deficit of $37 billion . Our capital shortfall as of December 31,
2024 to our minimum risk-based adjusted total capital requirement excluding buffers was $146 billion . From December
31, 2023 to December 31, 2024 , our capital shortfall including buffers declined by $16 billion and our capital shortfall
excluding buffers declined by $18 billion . These declines were primarily driven by the increase in our retained earnings
during 2024 and the impact of the amendments to the enterprise regulatory capital framework that became effective in
April 2024.
Capital Metrics under the Enterprise Regulatory Capital Framework as of December 31, 2024 (1)
(Dollars in billions)
Stress capital buffer
$ 33
Stability capital buffer
Adjusted total assets
$ 4,460
Countercyclical capital buffer
-
Risk-weighted assets
1,364
Prescribed capital conservation
buffer amount
$ 81
Minimum
Capital Ratio
Requirement
Minimum
Capital
Requirement
Available
Capital
(Deficit)
Capital
Shortfall
(without
Buffers) (2)
Applicable
Buffers (3)
Total Capital
Requirement
(including
Buffers)
Capital
Shortfall
(including
Buffers) (4)
Risk-based capital:
Total capital (statutory)
8.0 %
$ 109
$ (18)
$ (127)
N/A
$ 109
$ (127)
Common equity tier 1 capital
4.5
(56)
(117)
$ 81
(198)
Tier 1 capital
6.0
(37)
(119)
(200)
Adjusted total capital
8.0
(37)
(146)
(227)
Leverage capital:
Core capital (statutory)
2.5
(26)
(137)
N/A
(137)
Tier 1 capital
2.5
(37)
(148)
(172)
Capital Metrics under the Enterprise Regulatory Capital Framework as of December 31, 2023 (1)
(Dollars in billions)
Stress capital buffer
$ 34
Stability capital buffer
Adjusted total assets
$ 4,552
Countercyclical capital buffer
-
Risk-weighted assets
1,357
Prescribed capital conservation
buffer amount
$ 79
Minimum
Capital Ratio
Requirement
Minimum
Capital
Requirement
Available
Capital
(Deficit)
Capital
Shortfall
(without
Buffers) (2)
Applicable
Buffers (3)
Total Capital
Requirement
(including
Buffers)
Capital
Shortfall
(including
Buffers) (4)
Risk-based capital:
Total capital (statutory)
8.0 %
$ 109
$ (34)
$ (143)
N/A
$ 109
$ (143)
Common equity tier 1 capital
4.5
(74)
(135)
$ 79
(214)
Tier 1 capital
6.0
(55)
(136)
(215)
Adjusted total capital
8.0
(55)
(164)
(243)
Leverage capital:
Core capital (statutory)
2.5
(43)
(157)
N/A
(157)
Tier 1 capital
2.5
(55)
(169)
(192)
(1) Ratios are calculated as a percentage of risk-weighted assets for risk-based capital metrics and as a percentage of adjusted total assets
for leverage capital metrics.
(2) The capital shortfall in this column is the difference between the capital requirement (excluding buffers) and the available capital deficit.
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
MD&A | Liquidity and Capital Management
(3) PCCBA for risk-based capital and PLBA for leverage capital.
(4) The capital shortfall in this column is the difference between the capital requirement (including buffers) and the available capital deficit.
While it is not applicable until the date of termination of our conservatorship, our maximum payout ratio represents the
percentage of eligible retained income that we are permitted to pay out in the form of distributions or discretionary bonus
payments under the enterprise regulatory capital framework. As a result of our capital shortfall, our maximum payout
ratio under the enterprise regulatory capital framework as of December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023 was 0% . See
“ Note 13, Regulatory Capital Requirements ” for information on our capital ratios as of December 31, 2024 and
December 31, 2023 under the enterprise regulatory capital framework.
The table below presents certain components of our regulatory capital.
Regulatory Capital Components
As of December 31,
(Dollars in millions)
Total equity
$ 94,657
$ 77,682
Less:
Senior preferred stock
120,836
120,836
Preferred stock
19,130
19,130
Common equity
(45,309)
(62,284)
Less: deferred tax assets arising from temporary differences that exceed 10% of
common equity tier 1 capital and other regulatory adjustments
10,545
11,681
Common equity tier 1 capital (deficit)
(55,854)
(73,965)
Add: perpetual, noncumulative preferred stock
19,130
19,130
Tier 1 capital (deficit)
(36,724)
(54,835)
Tier 2 capital adjustments
-
-
Adjusted total capital (deficit)
$ (36,724)
$ (54,835)
The table below presents certain components of our core capital.
Statutory Capital Components
As of December 31,
(Dollars in millions)
Total equity
$ 94,657
$ 77,682
Less:
Senior preferred stock
120,836
120,836
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of taxes
Core capital (deficit)
(26,208)
(43,186)
Less: general allowance for foreclosure losses
(7,876)
(8,934)
Total capital (deficit)
$ (18,332)
$ (34,252)
Capital Activity
Under the terms governing the senior preferred stock, no dividends were payable to Treasury for the fourth quarter of
2024 and none are payable for the first quarter of 2025 .
Under the terms governing the senior preferred stock, through and including the capital reserve end date, any increase
in our net worth during a fiscal quarter results in an increase in the same amount of the aggregate liquidation preference
of the senior preferred stock in the following quarter. The capital reserve end date is defined as the last day of the
second consecutive fiscal quarter during which we have had and maintained capital equal to, or in excess of, all of the
capital requirements and buffers under the enterprise regulatory capital framework.
As a result of these terms governing the senior preferred stock, the aggregate liquidation preference of the senior
preferred stock increased to $212.0 billion as of December 31, 2024 due to the $4.0 billion increase in our net worth in
the third quarter of 2024 . The aggregate liquidation preference of the senior preferred stock will further increase to
$216.1 billion as of March 31, 2025 , due to the $4.1 billion increase in our net worth in the fourth quarter of 2024 . See
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
MD&A | Liquidity and Capital Management
“ Business - Conservatorship and Treasury Agreements - Treasury Agreements ” for more information on the terms of
our senior preferred stock, including how the aggregate liquidation preference is determined.
Treasury Funding Commitment
Treasury made a commitment under the senior preferred stock purchase agreement to provide funding to us under
certain circumstances if we have a net worth deficit. As of December 31, 2024 , the remaining amount of Treasury’s
funding commitment to us was $113.9 billion . See “ Note 2, Conservatorship, Senior Preferred Stock Purchase
Agreement and Related Matters ” for more information on Treasury’s funding commitment under the senior preferred
stock purchase agreement.
Risk Management
Overview
We manage the risks that arise from our business activities through our enterprise risk management program . Our risk
management activities are aligned with the requirements of FHFA’s Enterprise Risk Management Program Advisory
Bulletin, which are consistent with the general principles set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the
Treadway Commission’s (“COSO”) Enterprise Risk Management-Integrating with Strategy and Performance
framework.
Risk Categories
We are exposed to the following principal risk categories:
• Credit Risk . Credit risk is the risk of loss arising from another party’s failure to meet its contractual obligations.
For financial securities or instruments, credit risk is the risk of not receiving principal, interest or other financial
obligation on a timely basis. Our credit risk exposure exists primarily in connection with our guaranty book of
business and our institutional counterparties.
• Market Risk . Market risk is the risk of loss resulting from changes in the economic environment. Market risk
arises from fluctuations in interest rates, exchange rates and other market rates and prices. Market risk
includes interest-rate risk, which is the risk that movements in interest rates will adversely affect the value of
our assets or liabilities or our future earnings or capital. Market risk also includes spread risk, which is the risk
from changes in an instrument’s value that relate to factors other than changes in interest rates.
• Liquidity Risk . Liquidity risk is the risk to our financial condition and resilience arising from an inability to meet
obligations when they come due, including the risk associated with the inability to access funding sources or
manage fluctuations in funding levels.
• Operational Risk . Operational risk is the risk of loss resulting from inadequate or failed internal processes,
people, systems, and third parties, or disruptions from external events . Operational risk includes cyber and
other information security risk.
• Model Risk . Model risk is the risk of potential adverse consequences (such as financial loss or reputational
damage) due to: inappropriate model design; errors in model coding, implementation, inputs or assumptions;
inadequate model performance; or incorrect use or application of model outputs or reports.
• Strategic Risk . Strategic risk is the risk of loss resulting from poor implementation of business decisions or the
failure to respond appropriately to changes in the industry or external environment.
• Compliance Risk . Compliance risk is the risk of legal or regulatory sanctions, damage to current or projected
financial condition, damage to business resilience or damage to reputation resulting from nonconformance with
compliance obligations.
• Reputational Risk . Reputational risk is the risk that substantial negative publicity may cause a decline in public
perception of us, a decline in our customer base, costly litigation, revenue reductions or losses.
We are also exposed to climate risk. We view climate risk as a cross-cutting risk that can impact a variety of our existing
risk categories, particularly credit risk. See “ Climate and Natural Disaster Risk Management ” for a discussion of climate
risks and climate risk management.
See “ Risk Factors ” for a more detailed discussion of these and other risks that could materially adversely affect our
business, results of operations, financial condition, liquidity and net worth. The following discussion, as well as the
“ Single-Family Business - Single-Family Mortgage Credit Risk Management , ” “ Multifamily Business - Multifamily
Mortgage Credit Risk Management ” and “Liquidity and Capital Management” sections of this report, address how we
manage the categories of risk we have determined present the most significant exposure.
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
MD&A | Risk Management
Components of Risk Management
Our risk management program is composed of four inter-related components.
• Governance & Organizational Structure. Our risk governance structure establishes authority, responsibility
and accountability for risk management, which we conduct through a variety of controls designed to act in
concert, including delegations of authority, risk committees, risk policies, risk appetite and risk limits.
• Risk Appetite Framework. We manage and govern our risk-taking activities through a risk appetite and limits
framework that is aligned to our corporate strategy and defines boundaries across businesses and risk types.
• Risk Identification, Assessment, Control & Monitoring. We identify, assess, respond to, control, and
monitor risks generated in the pursuit of our strategy and objectives. Performing these activities across the
company allows us to address risks arising from different sources and tailor appropriate responses.
• Reporting & Communication Processes. We identify, capture and communicate relevant information so that
stakeholders can carry out their responsibilities and make sound and informed risk management decisions.
Risk Management Governance
We manage risk by using the “three lines model.” Our Board of Directors and management-level risk committees are
also integral to our risk management program .
Board of Directors
• Oversees our enterprise risk management program and its alignment with our strategy and business objectives
• Approves Board-level risk policies, risk appetite and risk limits
• Delegates authorities to the President and CEO and Enterprise Risk Committee
• Certain activities require conservator decision or notification
Risk Policy & Capital Committee
• Assists the Board in overseeing enterprise risk management and recommends for Board approval Board-level
risk policies, risk appetite and limits
Audit Committee
• Oversees our accounting, reporting, and financial practices, including the integrity of our financial statements
and internal control over financial reporting, as well as our compliance with legal and regulatory requirements
Management-Level Risk Committees
• Consist of an Enterprise Risk Committee chaired by our Chief Risk Officer an d additional committees
overseeing risk across the company
• Include members of management from the first, second and third line functions
• Approve management-level policies, establish risk parameters, and recommend risk policies
• Provide a cross-functional forum for discussing and documenting risks and responses
• Review decisions on matters that may expose our enterprise to significant, new or unusual risk
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
MD&A | Risk Management
Business Units & Corporate Functions (First Line)
• Accountable for identifying, assessing, controlling, monitoring and reporting on all risks in executing their
functions and operating in a sound control environment
• Conform to the risk appetite, policies, standards, and limits or thresholds approved by FHFA, the Board and the
relevant management-level risk committees
• Includes control functions that provide control and oversight
Corporate Risk & Compliance Division (Second Line)
• Oversees all first-line activities to create an aggregate view of the company’s financial and non-financial risks
relative to risk appetite
• Second-line functions are independent and report directly to the Board of Directors and President and CEO
Internal Audit (Third Line)
• An independent, objective assurance and advisory function
• Provides an independent evaluation of the effectiveness of internal controls, risk management, and governance
Credit Risk Management Overview
Below we discuss how we manage mortgage credit risk, institutional counterparty credit risk, and climate and natural
disaster risk.
Mortgage Credit Risk Management
Mortgage credit risk arises from the risk of loss resulting from the failure of a borrower to make required mortgage
payments. We are exposed to credit risk on our book of business because we either hold mortgage assets, have issued
a guaranty in connection with the creation of Fannie Mae MBS backed by mortgage assets or have provided other credit
enhancements on mortgage assets. For information on how we manage mortgage credit risk, see “ Single-Family
Business - Single-Family Mortgage Credit Risk Management ” and “ Multifamily Business - Multifamily Mortgage Credit
Risk Management .”
Institutional Counterparty Credit Risk Management
Overview
Institutional counterparty credit risk is the risk of loss resulting from the failure of an institutional counterparty to fulfill its
contractual obligations to us. Our primary exposure to institutional counterparty credit risk exists with our:
• credit guarantors, including mortgage insurers, reinsurers and multifamily lenders with risk sharing
arrangements;
• mortgage lenders that sell loans to us and mortgage lenders and other counterparties that service our loans ;
and
• financial institutions that issue the investments held in our corporate liquidity portfolio.
We also have direct counterparty exposure to: derivatives counterparties, custodial depository institutions; mortgage
originators, investors and dealers; debt security dealers; central counterparty clearing institutions; and document
custodians.
We routinely enter into a high volume of transactions with counterparties in the financial services industry resulting in a
significant credit concentration with respect to this industry. We also may have multiple exposures to particular
counterparties, as many of our institutional counterparties perform several types of services for us. Accordingly, if one of
these counterparties were to become insolvent or otherwise default on its obligations to us, it could harm our business
and financial results in a variety of ways. Our overall objective in managing institutional counterparty credit risk is to
maintain individual and portfolio-level counterparty exposures within acceptable ranges based on our risk-based rating
system. We seek to achieve this objective through the following:
• establishment and observance of counterparty eligibility standards appropriate to each exposure type and level;
• establishment of risk limits;
• requiring collateralization of exposures where appropriate; and
• exposure monitoring and management.
See “ Risk Factors - Credit Risk ” for additional discussion of the risks to our business if one or more of our institutional
counterparties fails to fulfill their contractual obligations to us.
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
MD&A | Risk Management | Institutional Counterparty Credit Risk Management
Counterparty Risk Management Framework
Establishment and Observance of Counterparty Eligibility Standards
The institutions with which we do business vary in size, complexity and geographic footprint. Because of this,
counterparty eligibility criteria vary depending upon the type and magnitude of the risk exposure incurred. We use a risk-
based approach to assess the credit risk of our counterparties through regular examination of their financial statements,
confidential communication with the management of those counterparties and regular monitoring of publicly available
credit rating information. This and other information is used to develop proprietary credit rating metrics that we use to
assess credit quality. Factors including corporate or third-party support or guarantees, our knowledge of the
counterparty and its management, reputation, quality of operations and experience are also important in determining the
initial and continuing eligibility of a counterparty.
Establishment of Risk Limits
Institutions are assigned a risk limit to ensure that our risk exposure is maintained at a level appropriate for the
institution’s credit assessment and the time horizon for the exposure, as well as to diversify exposure so that we
adequately manage our concentration risk. A corporate risk limit is first established at the counterparty level for the
aggregate of all activity and then is divided among our individual business units. Our business units may further
subdivide limits among products or activities.
Collateralization of Exposures
We may require collateral, letters of credit or investment agreements as a condition to approving exposure to a
counterparty. Collateral requirements are determined after a comprehensive review of the credit quality and the level of
risk exposure of each counterparty. We may require that a counterparty post collateral in the event of an adverse event
such as a ratings downgrade. Collateral requirements are monitored and generally adjusted each business day.
Exposure Monitoring and Management
The risk management functions of the individual business units are responsible for managing the counterparty
exposures associated with their activities within risk limits. An oversight team that reports to our Chief Risk Officer is
responsible for establishing and enforcing corporate policies and procedures regarding counterparties, establishing
corporate limits and aggregating and reporting institutional counterparty exposure. We regularly update exposure limits
for individual institutions and communicate changes to the relevant business units. We regularly report exposures
against the risk limits to the Risk Policy and Capital Committee of the Board of Directors.
Mortgage Insurers
We are generally required, pursuant to our charter, to obtain credit enhancements on single-family conventional
mortgage loans that we purchase or securitize with LTV ratios over 80% at the time of purchase. We use several types
of credit enhancements to manage our single-family mortgage credit risk, including primary and pool mortgage
insurance coverage. Our primary exposure associated with mortgage insurers is that they will fail to fulfill their
obligations to reimburse us for claims under our insurance policies.
Actions we take to manage this risk include:
• maintaining financial and operational eligibility requirements that an insurer must meet to become and remain a
qualified mortgage insurer;
• regularly monitoring our exposure to individual mortgage insurers and mortgage insurer credit ratings, including
in-depth financial reviews and analyses of the insurers’ portfolios and capital adequacy under hypothetical
stress scenarios;
• requiring certification and supporting documentation annually from each mortgage insurer; and
• performing periodic reviews of mortgage insurers to confirm compliance with eligibility requirements and to
evaluate their management, control and underwriting practices.
The master policies issued by our primary mortgage insurers govern their claim-paying obligations to us, including
circumstances in which significant underwriting or servicing defects might permit the mortgage insurer to rescind
coverage or deny a claim. Where a claim has not been properly paid as a result of lender non-compliance with their
obligation to maintain coverage, the lender is required to make us whole for losses not covered by the insurer. The risk
of coverage rescission is mitigated by the rescission relief principles we require in mortgage insurer master policies, and
may also be mitigated by the quality control standards required by our private mortgage insurer eligibility requirements
(“PMIERs”). Generally, the rescission relief principles align with our representation and warranty framework and require
our primary mortgage insurers to waive their rescission rights after a mortgage has performed for at least 36 months or
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
MD&A | Risk Management | Institutional Counterparty Credit Risk Management
if they have completed a full review of the loan and found no significant defects. See below for a discussion of the
PMIERs .
In describing our mortgage insurance coverage, “insurance in force” refers to the unpaid principal balance of single-
family loans in our conventional guaranty book of business covered under the applicable mortgage insurance policies.
Our total mortgage insurance in force was $753.5 billion , or 21% of our single-family conventional guaranty book of
business, as of December 31, 2024 , compared with $755.8 billion , or 21% of our single-family conventional guaranty
book of business, as of December 31, 2023 .
“Risk in force” refers to the maximum potential loss recovery under the applicable mortgage insurance policies in force
and is generally based on the loan-level insurance coverage percentage and, if applicable, any aggregate pool loss
limit, as specified in the policy. As of December 31, 2024 , our total mortgage insurance risk in force was $202.3 billion ,
or 6% of our single-family conventional guaranty book of business, compared with $200.1 billion , or 6% of our single-
family conventional guaranty book of business, as of December 31, 2023 .
Our total mortgage insurance in force and risk in force excludes insurance coverage provided by federal government
entities and credit insurance obtained through CIRT deals.
The charts below display our mortgage insurer counterparties that provided 10% or more of the risk-in-force mortgage
insurance coverage on the loans in our single-family conventional guaranty book of business.
Mortga ge Insurer Concentration (1)
Mortgage Guaranty Insurance Corp.
Radian Guaranty, Inc.
Arch Capital Group Ltd.
Enact Mortgage Insurance Corp.
Essent Guaranty, Inc.
National Mortgage Insurance Corp.
(1) Insurance coverage amounts provided for each counterparty may include coverage provided by affiliates and subsidiaries of the
counterparty.
Mortgage insurers must meet and maintain compliance with PMIERs to be eligible to write mortgage insurance on loans
acquired by Fannie Mae. The PMIERs are designed to ensure that mortgage insurers have sufficient liquid assets to
pay all claims under a hypothetical future stress scenario. In August 2024, FHFA announced that Fannie Mae and
Freddie Mac are issuing updates to the PMIERs , which are the financial and operational standards that private
mortgage insurance companies must meet to provide insurance on the mortgage loans that we and Freddie Mac
acquire. The updated standards primarily are designed to address the risk associated with the quality of a mortgage
insurer’s investment portfolio and the potential for that portfolio to lose value. FHFA stated that the updated standards
will improve Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac’s counterparty risk management and better prepare them to withstand a
future stress situation while fulfilling their mission to serve as a reliable source of liquidity for equitable and sustainable
housing finance throughout the economic cycle. The updated standards are expected to b e implemented through a 24-
month phased-in approach, with a fully effective date of September 30, 2026 .
Mortgage insurance only covers losses that are realized after the borrower defaults and title to the property is
subsequently transferred, such as after a foreclosure, short-sale, or a deed-in-lieu of foreclosure. Also, mortgage
insurance does not protect us from all losses on covered loans. For example, mortgage insurance is not intended to
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
MD&A | Risk Management | Institutional Counterparty Credit Risk Management
cover property damage from hazards, including natural disasters; and the mortgage insurance policy permits the
exclusion of any material loss directly related to property damage.
W e require single-family and multifamily borrowers to obtain and maintain property insurance to cover the risk of
damage to their homes or properties resulting from hazards such as fire, wind and, for properties in areas identified by
FEMA as Special Flood Hazard Areas, flooding. Since we generally permit borrowers to select and obtain required
hazard insurance policies, our requirements for hazard insurance coverage are verified by the lender or servicer, as
applicable. For single-family loans, we require a minimum financial strength rating for non-governmental hazard insurers
that must be provided by S&P Global, Demotech, AM Best or KBRA. For multifamily loans, we require a minimum
financial strength rating for non-governmental hazard insurers that must be provided by Demotech or AM Best. We do
not independently verify the financial condition of these hazard insurers and rely on these rating agencies for their
assessment of the financial condition of these insurer s .
See “ Risk Factors - Credit Risk ” for a discussion of the risks to our business of claims under our mortgage insurance
policies not being paid in full or at all, as well as a discussion of risks if borrowers suffer property damage as a result of
hazards for which the borrowers have no or insufficient insurance.
Reinsurers
We use CIRT deals to transfer credit risk on a pool of loans to an insurance provider that retains the risk, or to an
insurance provider that simultaneously cedes all of its risk to one or more reinsurers. In CIRT transactions, we select the
insurance providers and approve the allocation of coverage that may be simultaneously transferred to reinsurers by a
direct provider of our CIRT insurance coverage. We take certain steps to increase the likelihood that we will recover on
the claims we file with the insurers, including the following:
• In our approval and selection of CIRT insurers and reinsurers, we take into account the financial strength of
those companies and the concentration risk that we have with those counterparties.
• We monitor the financial strength of CIRT insurers and reinsurers to confirm compliance with our requirements
and to minimize potential exposure. Changes in the financial strength of an insurer or reinsurer may impact our
future allocation of new CIRT insurance coverage to those providers. In addition, a material deterioration of the
financial strength of a CIRT insurer or reinsurer may permit us to terminate existing CIRT coverage pursuant to
terms of the CIRT insurance policy.
• We require a portion of the insurers’ or reinsurers’ obligations in a CIRT transaction to be collateralized with
highly-rated liquid assets held in a trust account. The required amount of collateral is initially determined
according to the ratings of the insurer or reinsurer. Contractual provisions require additional collateral to be
posted in the event of adverse developments with the counterparty, such as a ratings downgrade to specified
levels.
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
MD&A | Risk Management | Institutional Counterparty Credit Risk Management
T he charts below display the concentration of our credit risk exposure to our top five CIRT counterparties, measured by
maximum liability to us, excluding the benefit of collateral we hold to secure the counterparties’ obligations. For
purposes of determining our top five CIRT counterparties, we separately consider affiliated entities and do not combine
their concentrations.
CIRT Counterparty Concentration
Top 5
Others
• As of December 31, 2024 , our CIRT counterparties had a maximum liability to us of $17.5 billion .
• As of December 31, 2024 , $4.8 billion in liquid assets securing CIRT counterparties’ obligations were held in
trust accounts.
• Our top five CIRT counterparties had a maximum liability to us of $8.5 billion as of December 31, 2024 and
$8.6 billion as of December 31, 2023 .
For information on our credit risk transfer transactions, see “ Single-Family Business - Single-Family Mortgage Credit
Risk Management - Single-Family Credit Enhancement and Transfer of Mortgage Credit Risk - Credit Risk Transfer
Transactions ” and “ Multifamily Business - Multifamily Mortgage Credit Risk Management - Multifamily Transfer of
Mortgage Credit Risk .”
Multifamily Lenders with Risk Sharing
We enter into risk sharing agreements with multifamily lenders, primarily through the DUS program, pursuant to which
the lenders agree to bear a portion of the credit losses on the covered loans. Our maximum potential loss recovery from
lenders under risk sharing agreements on multifamily loans was $ 119.8 billion as of December 31, 2024 , compared with
$111.9 billion as of December 31, 2023 . As of December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023 , 52% of our maximum
potential loss recovery on multifamily loans was from five DUS lenders.
As noted above in “ Multifamily Business - Multifamily Mortgage Credit Risk Management - Multifamily Transfer of
Mortgage Credit Risk ,” our primary multifamily delivery channel is our DUS program, which is composed of lenders that
range from large depositories to independent non-bank financial institutions. As of December 31, 2024 , approximately
30% of the unpaid principal balance of loans in our multifamily guaranty book of business serviced by our DUS lenders
was from institutions with an external investment grade credit rating or a guaranty from an affiliate with an external
investment grade credit rating, compared with approximately 31% as of December 31, 2023 . Given the recourse nature
of the DUS program, DUS lenders are bound by eligibility standards that dictate, among other items, minimum capital
and liquidity levels, and the posting of collateral at a highly rated custodian to secure a portion of the lenders’ future
obligations. We actively monitor the financial condition of these lenders to help ensure the level of risk remains within
our standards and to ensure required capital levels are maintained and are in alignment with actual and modeled loss
projections.
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
MD&A | Risk Management | Institutional Counterparty Credit Risk Management
Mortgage Servicers and Sellers
The primary risk associated with mortgage servicers that service the loans in our guaranty book of business is that they
will fail to fulfill their servicing obligations. See “ Single-Family Business - Single-Family Primary Business Activities -
Single-Family Mortgage Servicing ” and “ Multifamily Business - Multifamily Primary Business Activities - Multifamily
Mortgage Servicing ” for more discussion on the services performed by our mortgage servicers.
A servicing contract breach could result in credit losses for us or could cause us to incur the cost of finding a
replacement servicer. Replacing a mortgage servicer can result in potentially significant increases in our costs, as well
as increased operational risks. If a mortgage servicer fails, it could result in a temporary disruption in servicing and loss
mitigation activities relating to the loans serviced by that mortgage servicer, particularly if there is a loss of experienced
servicing personnel. See “ Risk Factors - Credit Risk ” for a discussion of additional risks to our business and financial
results associated with mortgage servicers.
We mitigate these risks in several ways, including by:
• establishing minimum standards and financial requirements for our servicers;
• monitoring financial and portfolio performance as compared with peers and internal benchmarks;
• for our largest mortgage servicers, conducting periodic financial reviews to confirm compliance with servicing
guidelines and servicing performance expectations; and
• identifying a group of servicers as potential contingency sub-servicers to which we could transfer the servicing
of some of the loans in our guaranty book in the event one or more of our top mortgage servicers is not able or
permitted to continue servicing our loans on our behalf.
We may take one or more of the following actions to mitigate our credit exposure to mortgage servicers that present a
higher risk:
• require a guaranty of obligations by higher-rated entities;
• transfer exposure to third parties;
• require collateral;
• establish more stringent financial requirements;
• work with underperforming major servicers to improve operational processes; and
• suspend or terminate the selling and servicing relationship if deemed appropriate.
As of December 31, 2024 , over half of our single-family guaranty book and over half of our multifamily guaranty book
were serviced by non-depository servicers . Compared with depository financial institutions, these institutions pose
additional risks to us because they generally have lower financial strength and liquidity as compared with our mortgage
servicer counterparties that are depository institutions. Unlike for depository servicers, much of the capital of non-
depository servicers is represented by the value of mortgage servicing rights, which is subject to variability based on
market conditions and therefore is an important factor in determining capital adequacy. Non-depository servicers also
are generally not subject to the same level of regulatory oversight as our mortgage servicer counterparties that are
depository institutions. We require non-depository servicers to meet minimum liquidity requirements to maintain
eligibility with Fannie Mae. We actively monitor the financial condition and capital adequacy of non-depository servicers,
including their compliance with our requirements.
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
MD&A | Risk Management | Institutional Counterparty Credit Risk Management
The charts below display the percentage of our single-family conventional guaranty book of business serviced by our
top five depository single-family mortgage servicers and top five non-depository single-family mortgage servicers.
Single-Family Mortgage Servicer Concentration
Top 5 depository servicers
Top 5 non-depository servicers
Others
N one of our single-family mortgage servicers serviced 10% or more of our single-family conventional guaranty book of
business as of December 31, 2024 or 2023 . See “Risk Factors-Credit Risk” for more information about risks relating to
non-depository servicers.
The charts below display the percentage of our multifamily guaranty book of business serviced by our top five
depository multifamily mortgage servicers and top five non-depository multifamily mortgage servicers.
Multifamily Mortgage Servicer Concentration
Top 5 depository servicers
Top 5 non-depository servicers
Others
As of December 31, 2024 , Walker & Dunlop, Inc. serviced 14% of our multifamily guaranty book of business based on
unpaid principal balance. As of December 31, 2023 , Walker & Dunlop, Inc. and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (together with its
affiliates) serviced 13% and 10% , respectively, of our multifamily guaranty book of business based on unpaid principal
balance. No other multifamily mortgage servicers serviced 10% or more of our multifamily guaranty book of business as
of December 31, 2024 or 2023 . Walker & Dunlop, Inc. is a non-depository servicer and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. is a
depository servicer.
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
MD&A | Risk Management | Institutional Counterparty Credit Risk Management
Counterparty Credit Exposure Relating to our Corporate Liquidity Portfolio
The primary credit exposure associated with assets held in our corporate liquidity portfolio is that issuers will not repay
principal and interest in accordance with the contractual terms. If one of these counterparties fails to meet its obligations
to us under the terms of the investments, it could result in financial losses to us and have a material adverse effect on
our earnings, liquidity, financial condition and net worth. We believe the risk of default is low because our corporate
liquidity portfolio primarily consists of cash and cash equivalents, reverse repurchase agreements with a central
counterparty clearing institution or The Federal Reserve Bank of New York and U.S. Treasury securities.
As of December 31, 2024 , our corporate liquidity portfolio totaled $132.4 billion and included $77.6 billion of U.S.
Treasury securities. As of December 31, 2023 , our corporate liquidity portfolio totaled $114.3 billion and included $47.8
billion of U.S. Treasury securities. We mitigate our risk by monitoring the credit risk position of our corporate liquidity
portfolio. As of December 31, 2024 , we held $11.7 billion in overnight unsecured deposits with six financial institutions,
compared with $11.8 billion held with six financial institutions as of December 31, 2023 . The short-term credit ratings for
each of these financial institutions by S&P, Moody’s and Fitch were at least A-1 or the Moody’s or Fitch equivalent of
A-1.
See “ Liquidity and Capital Management - Liquidity Management - Corporate Liquidity Portfolio ” for more information on
our corporate liquidity portfolio.
Other Counterparties
Derivative Counterparty Credit Exposure
The primary credit exposure that we have on a derivative transaction is that a counterparty will default on payments
due, which could result in us having to acquire a replacement derivative from a different counterparty at a higher cost or
we may be unable to find a suitable replacement. Our derivative counterparty credit exposure relates principally to
interest-rate derivative contracts.
Derivative instruments may be privately negotiated contracts, which are often referred to as OTC derivatives, or they
may be listed and traded on an exchange where they are accepted for clearing by a derivatives clearing organization as
our cleared derivative transactions.
Actions we take to manage our derivative counterparty credit exposure relating to our OTC derivative transactions
include:
• entering into enforceable master netting arrangements with these counterparties, which allow us to net
derivative assets and liabilities with the same counterparty; and
• requiring counterparties to post collateral, which includes cash, U.S. Treasury securities, agency debt and
agency mortgage-related securities.
We manage our credit exposure relating to our cleared derivative transactions through enforceable master netting
arrangements. These arrangements allow us to net our exposure to cleared derivatives by clearing organization and by
clearing member.
Our cleared derivative transactions are submitted to a derivatives clearing organization on our behalf through a clearing
member of the organization. A contract accepted by a derivatives clearing organization is governed by the terms of the
clearing organization’s rules and arrangements between us and the clearing member of the clearing organization. As a
result, we are exposed to the institutional credit risk of both the derivatives clearing organization and the member who is
acting on our behalf. As of December 31, 2024 , approximately 82% of our derivatives transactions were cleared through
a clearing organization, compared with 81% as of December 31, 2023 .
See “ Note 9, Derivative Instruments ” and “ Note 15, Netting Arrangements ” for additional information on our derivative
contracts as of December 31, 2024 and 2023 .
Counterparty Credit Risk Exposure Arising from the Resecuritization of Freddie Mac-Issued Securities
We have been resecuritizing Freddie Mac-issued securities since June 2019 when we began issuing UMBS, which has
increased our credit risk exposure and operational risk exposure to Freddie Mac. Although we have an indemnification
agreement with Freddie Mac, in the event Freddie Mac were to fail (for credit or operational reasons) to make a
payment on Freddie Mac securities that we had resecuritized in a Fannie Mae-issued structured security, we would be
responsible for making the entire payment on the Freddie Mac securities included in that structured security in order to
make payments on any of our outstanding single-family Fannie Mae MBS to be paid on that payment date. Accordingly,
if Freddie Mac were to fail to meet its obligations under the terms of these securities, it could have a material adverse
effect on our earnings and financial condition. We believe the risk of default by Freddie Mac is negligible because of the
funding commitment available to Freddie Mac through its senior preferred stock purchase agreement with Treasury.
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
MD&A | Risk Management | Institutional Counterparty Credit Risk Management
As of December 31, 2024 , $200.1 billion in Freddie Mac securities were backing Fannie Mae-issued structured
securities, compared with $215.6 billion as of December 31, 2023 . See “ Risk Factors - GSE and Conservatorship Risk ”
for more information on risks associated with our issuance of UMBS.
Central Counterparty Clearing Institutions
Fannie Mae is a clearing member of two divisions of Fixed Income Clearing Corporation (“FICC”), a central counterparty
(“CCP”). One FICC division clears our trades involving securities purchased under agreements to resell, securities sold
under agreements to repurchase, and other non-mortgage related securities. The other division clears our forward
purchase and sale commitments of mortgage-related securities, including dollar roll transactions. As a result of these
trades, we are required to post initial and variation margin payments as well as settle certain positions each business
day in cash. As a clearing member of FICC, we are exposed to the risk that the FICC or one or more of the CCP’s
clearing members fails to perform its obligations as described below.
• A default by or the financial or operational failure of FICC would require us to replace transactions cleared
through FICC, thereby increasing operational costs and potentially resulting in losses.
• We may also be exposed to losses if a clearing member of FICC defaults on its obligations as each clearing
member is required to absorb a portion of those fellow-clearing member losses. As a result, we could lose the
margin that we have posted to FICC. Moreover, our exposure could exceed the amount of margin that we
previously posted to FICC, since FICC’s rules require non-defaulting clearing members to cover, on a pro rata
basis, losses caused by a clearing member’s default.
We are unable to develop an estimate of the maximum potential amount of future payments that we could be required to
make to FICC under these arrangements as our exposure is dependent on the volume of trades FICC clearing
members execute now and in the future, which varies daily. Although we are unable to develop an estimate of our
maximum exposure, we expect that losses caused by any clearing member would be partially offset by the fair value of
margin posted by the defaulting clearing member and any other available assets of the CCP for those purposes. We
believe that the risk of a material loss is remote due to the FICC's margin and settlement requirements, guarantee funds
and other resources that are available in the event of a default.
We actively monitor the risks associated with the FICC in order to effectively manage this counterparty risk and our
associated liquidity exposure.
Custodial Depository Institutions
Our mortgage servicer counterparties are required by our Servicing Guide to use custodial depository institutions to hold
remittances of borrower payments of principal and interest on our behalf. If a custodial depository institution were to fail
while holding such remittances, we would be exposed to risk for balances in excess of the deposit insurance protection
and might not be able to recover all of the principal and interest payments being held by the depository on our behalf, or
there might be a substantial delay in receiving these amounts. If this were to occur, we would be required to replace
these amounts with our own funds to make payments that are due to Fannie Mae MBS certificateholders. Accordingly,
the insolvency of one of our principal custodial depository institutions could result in significant financial losses to us. To
mitigate these risks, our Servicing Guide requires our mortgage servicer counterparties to use custodial depository
institutions that are insured, that are rated as “well capitalized” by their regulator and that meet certain minimum
financial ratings from third-party agencies.
Mortgage Originators, Investors and Dealers
We are routinely exposed to pre-settlement risk through the purchase or sale of mortgage loans and mortgage-related
securities with mortgage originators, mortgage investors and mortgage dealers. The risk is the possibility that the
counterparty will be unable or unwilling to either deliver mortgage assets or compensate us for the cost to cancel or
replace the transaction. We manage this risk by determining position limits with these counterparties, based upon our
assessment of their creditworthiness, and by monitoring and managing these exposures.
Debt Security Dealers
The credit risk associated with dealers that commit to place our debt securities is that they will fail to honor their
contracts to take delivery of the debt, which could result in delayed issuance of the debt through another dealer. We
manage these risks by establishing approval standards, monitoring our exposure positions and monitoring changes in
the credit quality of dealers.
Document Custodians
We use third-party document custodians to provide loan document certification and custody services for some of the
loans that we purchase and securitize. In many cases, our lenders or their affiliates also serve as document custodians
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
MD&A | Risk Management | Institutional Counterparty Credit Risk Management
for us. Our ownership rights to the mortgage loans that we own or that back our Fannie Mae MBS could be challenged if
a lender intentionally or negligently pledges or sells the loans that we purchased or fails to obtain a release of prior liens
on the loans that we purchased, which could result in financial losses to us. When a lender or one of its affiliates acts as
a document custodian for us, the risk that our ownership interest in the loans may be adversely affected is increased,
particularly in the event the lender were to become insolvent. We mitigate these risks through legal and contractual
arrangements with these custodians that identify our ownership interest, as well as by establishing qualifying standards
for document custodians and requiring removal of the documents to our possession or to an independent third-party
document custodian if we have concerns about the solvency or competency of the document custodian.
The MERS System
The MERS ® System is an electronic registry owned by Intercontinental Exchange that is widely used by participants in
the mortgage finance industry to track servicing rights and ownership of loans in the United States. A majority of the
loans we own or guarantee are registered and tracked in the MERS System. Though we believe it is unlikely, if we are
unable to use the MERS System, or if our use of the MERS System adversely affects our ability to enforce our rights
with respect to our loans registered and tracked in the MERS System, it could create operational and legal risks for us
and increase the costs and time it takes to record loans or foreclose on loans.
Climate and Natural Disaster Risk Management
Overview
Recent years have seen frequent and severe natural disasters in the U.S., including hurricanes, wildfires and floods. We
believe the frequency and intensity of major weather-related events in recent years are indicative of the impacts of
climate change, which we expect to persist and worsen in the future. Climate change presents immediate and long-term
risks to our business and other stakeholders in the housing system, including borrowers, renters, lenders, investors and
insurers. Climate risks are divided into two main categories:
• Physical risks, which relate to the physical impact of climate change and include both: acute risks, which are
event-driven risks relating to shorter-term extreme weather events, such as hurricanes, floods and tornadoes;
or chronic risks, which are longer-term shifts in climate patterns, such as sustained higher temperatures, sea
level rise, water scarcity and increased wildfires.
• Transition risks, which relate to a potential transition to a lower-carbon economy and may be driven by
additional regulatory and legislative requirements, adoption of new technologies and shifts in consumer
behavior. The transition to a lower-carbon economy may cause stress to households and certain business
sectors.
We are developing a comprehensive, integrated approach to identifying, assessing, and managing climate-related risks
and opportunities. Our efforts are directed towards analyzing our physical and transition risks, refining climate scenario
methodologies, and evaluating third-party climate models. We also continue to integrate climate risk considerations into
our Enterprise Risk Management framework.
Climate-Related Risk Exposure and Risk Mitigation
Major weather events or other natural disasters expose us to credit risk in a variety of ways, including by damaging
properties that secure mortgage loans in our book of business and by negatively impacting the ability of borrowers to
make payments on their mortgage loans. The amount of losses we incur as a result of a major weather event or natural
disaster depends significantly on the extent to which the resulting property damage is covered by hazard or flood
insurance and whether borrowers can continue making payments on their mortgages. The amount of losses we incur
can also be affected by the extent that a disaster impacts the region, especially if it depresses the local economy, and
by the availability of federal, state, or local assistance to borrowers affected by a disaster. To date, our losses from
natural disasters have been limited by geographic diversity in our book of business, the availability of insurance
coverage for damages sustained, the availability of federal, state, or local disaster assistance, and borrowers with equity
in their homes continuing to pay their mortgages. Fannie Mae is obligated to support residential mortgage liquidity
nationwide. We generally do not disqualify any single-family or multifamily property on the basis of its geographic
location in the U.S., nor do we charge higher guaranty fees in geographic areas that may pose potentially higher
climate-related risk.
We require borrowers to obtain and maintain property insurance to cover the risk of damage to their property resulting
from hazards such as fire, wind and, for properties in areas identified by FEMA as Special Flood Hazard Areas, flooding.
At the time of origination, a borrower is required to provide proof of such insurance, and our servicers have the right and
the obligation to obtain such insurance, at the borrower’s cost, if the borrower allows the required coverage to lapse. In
addition, our servicers monitor flood maps, and will require a flood insurance policy if a mortgaged property is remapped
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
MD&A | Risk Management | Climate and Natural Disaster Risk Management
into a Special Flood Hazard Area during the life of the loan. We do not require property insurance to cover damages
from flooding in areas outside a Special Flood Hazard Area, or to cover earthquake damage to single-family properties
or to multifamily properties unless required by a seismic-risk assessment. We estimate that , as of December 31, 2024 ,
3.3% of loans in our single-family guaranty book of business and 7.4% of loans in our multifamily guaranty book of
business were located in a Special Flood Hazard Area.
We also mitigate climate-related risks, in part, through credit risk transfer and risk-sharing transactions. To the extent
weather and disaster-related losses on loans covered by these transactions exceed the amount of losses we retain, a
portion of those losses would be covered by these credit risk transfer transactions. We also enter into risk-sharing
agreements with multifamily lenders, primarily through the DUS program. For more information on our single-family
credit risk transfer transactions, see “ Single-Family Business - Single-Family Mortgage Credit Risk Management -
Single-Family Credit Enhancement and Transfer of Mortgage Credit Risk - Credit Risk Transfer Transactions ” and for
more information on our multifamily credit risk transfer transactions and our DUS program, see “ Multifamily Business -
Multifamily Mortgage Credit Risk Management - Multifamily Transfer of Mortgage Credit Risk .”
In the event of a natural or other disaster, our servicers work with affected borrowers to develop a plan that addresses
the borrower’s specific situation. Depending on the circumstances, the plan may include one or more of the following: a
payment forbearance plan; a repayment or reinstatement plan; a payment deferral; loan modification; coordination with
insurance companies and administration of insurance proceeds; and, if appropriate, foreclosure alternatives such as
short sales and deeds-in-lieu of foreclosure, or foreclosure.
Climate Risk Governance
The Board’s Risk Policy and Capital Committee has primary oversight of climate-related risks to the company. The
Board’s Community Responsibility and Sustainability Committee oversees development and implementation of the
company’s strategic initiatives regarding climate resiliency. The Audit Committee provides oversight of corporate
responsibility and impact reporting, which includes climate-related reporting. In addition, our Climate Risk Committee
provides management-level engagement and oversight of climate risk. The Climate Risk Committee is chaired by our
Chief Risk Officer a nd supports the Enterprise Risk Committee.
See “ Risk Factors - Credit Risk ” for additional information on the risks we face from the occurrence of major natural or
other disasters and the impact of climate change.
Market Risk Management, including Interest-Rate Risk Management
We are subject to market risk, which includes interest-rate risk and spread risk. These risks arise primarily from our
mortgage asset investments. Interest-rate risk is the risk that movements in interest rates will adversely affect the value
of our assets or liabilities or our future earnings or capital. Spread risk is the risk from changes in an instrument’s value
that relate to factors other than changes in interest rates.
Interest-Rate Risk Management
Our exposure to interest-rate risk primarily arises from two sources: our net portfolio and our consolidated MBS trusts .
Our goal is to manage interest-rate risk from our net portfolio to be neutral to changes in interest rates and volatility on
an economic basis, subject to model constraints and prevailing market conditions. We collectively define our net
portfolio as: our retained mortgage portfolio assets; our corporate liquidity portfolio; outstanding debt of Fannie Mae
used to fund the retained mortgage portfolio assets and corporate liquidity portfolio; mortgage commitments; and risk
management derivatives.
We employ an integrated interest-rate risk management strategy that allows for informed risk taking within pre-defined
corporate risk limits. Decisions regarding our strategy in managing interest-rate risk are based upon our corporate
market risk policy and limits that are approved by our Board of Directors.
We monitor current market conditions, including the interest-rate environment, to assess the impact of these conditions
on individual positions and our interest-rate risk profile. In addition to qualitative factors, we use various quantitative risk
metrics in determining the appropriate composition of our retained mortgage portfolio, our investments in non-mortgage
securities and relative mix of debt and derivatives positions in order to remain within pre-defined risk tolerance levels
that we consider acceptable. We regularly disclose two interest-rate risk metrics that estimate our interest-rate
exposure: (1) fair value sensitivity to changes in interest-rate levels and the slope of the yield curve and (2) duration
gap.
The metrics used to measure our interest-rate exposure are generated using internal models. Our internal models,
consistent with standard practice for models used in our industry, require numerous assumptions. There are inherent
limitations in any methodology used to estimate the exposure to changes in market interest rates. The reliability of our
prepayment estimates and interest-rate risk metrics depends on the availability and quality of historical data for each of
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
MD&A | Risk Management | Market Risk Management, including Interest-Rate Risk Management
the types of securities in our net portfolio, as discussed below. When market conditions change rapidly and dramatically,
the assumptions of our models may no longer accurately capture or reflect the changing conditions. See “ Risk Factors
- Operational and Model Risk ” for a discussion of the risks associated with our reliance on models to manage risk.
Sources of Interest-Rate Risk Exposure
Our mortgage assets consist mainly of single-family and multifamily mortgage loans. For single-family loans, borrowers
have the option to prepay at any time before the scheduled maturity date. This prepayment uncertainty results in a
potential mismatch between the timing of receipt of cash flows related to our assets and the timing of payment of cash
flows related to our liabilities. Changes in interest rates, as well as other factors, influence mortgage prepayment rates
and duration and also affect the value of our mortgage assets. When interest rates decrease, prepayment rates on
fixed-rate mortgages generally accelerate because borrowers usually can pay off their existing mortgages and refinance
at lower rates. Accelerated prepayment rates have the effect of shortening the duration and average life of the fixed-rate
mortgage assets we hold in our net portfolio. In a declining interest-rate environment, existing mortgage assets held in
our net portfolio tend to increase in value or price because these mortgages are likely to have higher interest rates than
new mortgages, which are being originated at the then-current lower interest rates. Conversely, when interest rates
increase, prepayment rates generally slow, which extends the duration and average life of our mortgage assets and
results in a decrease in value. Interest rates also affect the value of our non-mortgage assets, which are primarily fixed-
rate securities. As interest rates decline, the value of our fixed-rate securities tend to increase with the opposite impact
when rates rise.
We are also exposed to interest-rate risk in connection with cost basis adjustments related to mortgage assets, mainly
single-family and multifamily mortgage loans, held by our consolidated MBS trusts. These cost basis adjustments often
result from upfront cash fees exchanged at the time of loan acquisition, which include buy-ups, buy-downs, and loan-
level risk-based price adjustments. The timing of when we recognize amortization income related to cost basis
adjustments may be affected by prepayments, thereby impacting our earnings. Changes in the timing of income
recognition related to cost basis adjustments impact the present value of this income. See “ Consolidated Results of
Operations - Net Interest Income - Analysis of Unamortized Deferred Guaranty Fee Income ” for more information on
our outstanding net cost basis adjustments related to consolidated MBS trusts.
We are also exposed to interest-rate risk in connection with the float income earned by MBS trusts on the short-term
reinvestment of loan payments received from borrowers in highly liquid investments with short maturities, such as U.S.
Treasury securities. This float income is paid to us as trust management income and recorded within “Net interest
income” in our consolidated financial statements. Changes in interest rates impact the amount of float income generated
by MBS trusts and our float reinvestment yields. Typically, interest-rate driven changes in the timing of income
recognition related to cost basis amortization are partially offset by interest-rate driven changes in the amount of float
income earned.
For additional discussion of how interest rates can affect our financial results, see “ Key Market Economic Indicators -
How Interest Rates Can Affect Our Financial Results .”
Interest-Rate Risk Management Strategy
Our goal for managing the interest-rate risk of our net portfolio is to be neutral to movements in interest rates and
volatility. This involves asset selection and structuring of our liabilities to match and offset the interest-rate
characteristics of our retained mortgage portfolio and our investments in non-mortgage securities. We actively manage
the interest-rate risk of our net portfolio through a strategy incorporating the following principal elements:
• Debt Instruments. We issue a broad range of both callable and non-callable debt instruments to manage the
duration and prepayment risk of expected cash flows of the mortgage assets we own.
• Derivative Instruments. We supplement our issuance of debt with derivative instruments to further reduce
duration and prepayment risks.
• Monitoring and Active Portfolio Rebalancing. We continually monitor our risk positions and actively rebalance
our portfolio of interest rate-sensitive financial instruments to maintain a close match between the duration of
our assets and liabilities.
• Fair Value Hedge Accounting. We utilize fair value hedge accounting to align the timing of when we recognize
the interest-rate driven fair value changes in hedged mortgage loans and funding debt with derivative hedging
instruments to mitigate GAAP earnings exposure to interest-rate changes, including any short-term earnings
volatility that might result from economic hedging.
We do not currently actively manage or hedge, on an economic basis, our spread risk, or the interest-rate risk arising
from cost basis adjustments and float income associated with mortgage assets held by our consolidated MBS trusts.
Our spread risk includes the impact of changes in the spread between our mortgage assets and debt (referred to as
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
MD&A | Risk Management | Market Risk Management, including Interest-Rate Risk Management
mortgage-to-debt spreads) after we purchase mortgage assets. For mortgage assets in our portfolio that we intend to
hold to maturity to realize the contractual cash flows, we accept period-to-period volatility in our financial performance
attributable to changes in mortgage-to-debt spreads that occur after our purchase of mortgage assets. See “ Risk
Factors - Market and Industry Risk ” for a discussion of the risks to our business posed by changes in interest rates and
changes in spreads. See “Earnings Exposure to Interest-Rate Risk” below for the impact of market risk on our earnings.
Debt Instruments
Historically, the primary tool we have used to fund the purchase of mortgage assets and manage the interest-rate risk
implicit in our mortgage assets is the variety of debt instruments we issue. The debt we issue is a mix that typically
consists of short- and long-term, non-callable and callable debt. The varied maturities and flexibility of these debt
combinations help us in reducing the mismatch of cash flows between assets and liabilities in order to manage the
duration risk associated with an investment in long-term fixed-rate assets. Callable debt helps us manage the
prepayment risk associated with fixed-rate mortgage assets because the duration of callable debt changes when
interest rates change in a manner similar to changes in the duration of mortgage assets. See “ Liquidity and Capital
Management - Liquidity Management - Debt Funding ” for additional information on our debt activity.
Derivative Instruments
Derivative instruments also are an integral part of our strategy in managing interest-rate risk. See “ Note 9, Derivative
Instruments ” for a description of the derivatives we use for interest-rate risk management purposes and the factors we
consider in deciding whether to use derivatives.
We use interest-rate swaps, interest-rate options and futures, in combination with our issuance of debt securities, to
better match the duration of our assets with the duration of our liabilities. We are generally an end-user of derivatives;
our principal purpose in using derivatives is to manage our aggregate interest-rate risk profile within prescribed risk
parameters. We generally only use derivatives that are relatively liquid and straightforward to value. We use derivatives
for four primary purposes:
• as a substitute for notes and bonds that we issue in the debt markets;
• to achieve risk management objectives not obtainable with debt market securities;
• to quickly and efficiently rebalance our portfolio; and
• to hedge foreign currency exposure.
Decisions regarding the repositioning of our derivatives portfolio are based upon current assessments of our interest-
rate risk profile and economic conditions, including the composition of our retained mortgage portfolio, our investments
in non-mortgage securities and relative mix of our debt and derivative positions, the interest-rate environment and
expected trends.
Measurement of Interest-Rate Risk
Below we present two quantitative metrics that provide estimates of our interest-rate risk exposure: (1) fair value
sensitivity of our net portfolio to changes in interest-rate levels and slope of yield curve; and (2) duration gap. The
metrics presented are calculated using internal models that require standard assumptions regarding interest rates and
future prepayments of principal over the remaining life of our securities. These assumptions are derived based on the
characteristics of the underlying structure of the securities and historical prepayment rates experienced at specified
interest-rate levels, taking into account current market conditions, the current mortgage rates of our existing outstanding
loans, loan age and other factors. On a regular basis, management makes judgments about the appropriateness of the
risk assessments and will make adjustments as necessary to properly assess our interest-rate exposure and manage
our interest-rate risk. The methodologies used to calculate risk estimates are periodically changed on a prospective
basis to reflect improvements in the underlying estimation process.
Interest-Rate Sensitivity to Changes in Interest-Rate Level and Slope of Yield Curve
Pursuant to a disclosure commitment with FHFA, we disclose on a monthly basis the estimated adverse impact on the
fair value of our net portfolio that would result from the following hypothetical situations:
• a 50 basis point shift in interest rates; and
• a 25 basis point change in the slope of the yield curve.
In measuring the estimated impact of changes in the level of interest rates, we assume a parallel shift in all maturities of
the SOFR interest-rate swap curve.
In measuring the estimated impact of changes in the slope of the yield curve, we assume a constant 7-year rate and a
shift of 16.7 basis points for the 1-year rate and shorter tenors and an opposite shift of 8.3 basis points for the 30-year
rate. Rate shocks for remaining maturity points are interpolated. Our practice is to allow interest rates to go below zero
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
MD&A | Risk Management | Market Risk Management, including Interest-Rate Risk Management
in the downward shock models unless otherwise prevented through contractual floors. We believe the aforementioned
interest-rate shocks for our monthly disclosures represent moderate movements in interest rates over a one-month
period.
Duration Gap
Duration gap measures the price sensitivity of our assets and liabilities in our net portfolio to changes in interest rates by
quantifying the difference between the estimated durations of our assets and liabilities. Our duration gap analysis
reflects the extent to which the estimated maturity and repricing cash flows for our assets are matched, on average,
over time and across interest-rate scenarios to those of our liabilities. A positive duration gap indicates that the duration
of our assets exceeds the duration of our liabilities. We disclose duration gap on a monthly basis under the caption
“Interest Rate Risk Disclosures” in our Monthly Summary report, which is available on our website.
While our goal is to reduce the price sensitivity of our net portfolio to movements in interest rates, various factors can
contribute to a duration gap that is either positive or negative. For example, changes in the market environment can
increase or decrease the price sensitivity of our mortgage assets relative to the price sensitivity of our liabilities because
of prepayment uncertainty associated with our assets. In a declining interest-rate environment, prepayment rates tend to
accelerate, thereby shortening the duration and average life of the fixed-rate mortgage assets we hold in our net
portfolio. Conversely, when interest rates increase, prepayment rates generally slow, which extends the duration and
average life of our mortgage assets. Our debt and derivative instrument positions are used to manage the interest-rate
sensitivity of our retained mortgage portfolio and our investments in non-mortgage securities. As a result, the degree to
which the interest-rate sensitivity of our retained mortgage portfolio and our investments in non-mortgage securities is
offset will be dependent upon, among other factors, the mix of funding and other risk management derivative
instruments we use at any given point in time.
The market value sensitivities of our net portfolio are a function of both the duration and the convexity of our net
portfolio. Duration provides a measure of the price sensitivity of a financial instrument to changes in interest rates while
convexity reflects the degree to which the duration of the assets and liabilities in our net portfolio changes in response to
a given change in interest rates. We use convexity measures to provide us with information about how quickly and by
how much our net portfolio’s duration may change in different interest-rate environments. The market value sensitivity of
our net portfolio will depend on a number of factors, including the interest-rate environment, modeling assumptions and
the composition of assets and liabilities in our net portfolio, which vary over time.
Results of Interest-Rate Sensitivity Measures
The interest-rate risk measures discussed below exclude the impact of changes in the fair value of our guaranty assets
and liabilities resulting from changes in interest rates. We exclude our guaranty business from these sensitivity
measures based on our current assumption that the guaranty fee income generated from future business activity will
largely replace guaranty fee income lost due to mortgage prepayments.
The table below displays the pre-tax market value sensitivity of our net portfolio to changes in the level of interest rates
and the slope of the applicable yield curve as measured on the last day of each period presented. The table below also
provides the daily average, minimum, maximum and standard deviation values for duration gap and for the most
adverse market value impact on the net portfolio to changes in the level of interest rates and the slope of the applicable
yield curve for the three months ended December 31, 2024 and 2023 .
The sensitivity measures displayed in the table below, which we disclose on a quarterly basis pursuant to a disclosure
commitment with FHFA, are an extension of our monthly sensitivity measures discussed above. There are three primary
differences between our monthly sensitivity disclosure and the quarterly sensitivity disclosure presented below:
• the quarterly disclosure is expanded to include the sensitivity results for larger rate level shocks of positive or
negative 100 basis points;
• the monthly disclosure reflects the estimated pre-tax impact on the market value of our net portfolio calculated
based on a daily average, while the quarterly disclosure reflects the estimated pre-tax impact calculated based
on the estimated financial position of our net portfolio and the market environment as of the last business day of
the quarter; and
• the monthly disclosure shows the most adverse pre-tax impact on the market value of our net portfolio from the
hypothetical interest-rate shocks, while the quarterly disclosure includes the estimated pre-tax impact of both
up and down interest-rate shocks.
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
MD&A | Risk Management | Market Risk Management, including Interest-Rate Risk Management
Interest-Rate Sensitivity of Net Portfolio to Changes in Interest-Rate Level and Slope of Yield
Curve
As of December 31, (1)(2)
(Dollars in millions)
Rate level shock:
-100 basis points
$ 83
$ 53
-50 basis points
+50 basis points
(18)
(47)
+100 basis points
(29)
(93)
Rate slope shock:
-25 basis points (flattening)
(4)
(7)
+25 basis points (steepening)
For the Three Months Ended December 31, (1)(3)
Duration
Gap
Rate Slope
Shock 25 bps
Rate Level
Shock 50 bps
Duration
Gap
Rate Slope
Shock 25 bps
Rate Level
Shock 50 bps
Market Value Sensitivity
Market Value Sensitivity
(In years)
(Dollars in millions)
(In years)
(Dollars in millions)
Average
-
$ (2)
$ (11)
0.03
$ (11)
$ (27)
Minimum
(0.05)
(6)
(37)
(0.01)
(22)
(47)
Maximum
0.03
0.06
(1)
Standard deviation
0.02
0.02
(1) Computed based on changes in SOFR interest-rates swap curve.
(2) Measured on the last business day of each period presented.
(3) Computed based on daily values during the period presented.
The market value sensitivity of our net portfolio varies across a range of interest-rate shocks depending upon the
duration and convexity profile of our net portfolio. The market value sensitivity of the net portfolio is measured by
quantifying the change in the present value of the cash flows of our financial assets and liabilities that would result from
an instantaneous shock to interest rates, assuming spreads are held constant.
We use derivatives to help manage the residual interest-rate risk exposure between the assets and liabilities in our net
portfolio. Derivatives have enabled us to keep our economic interest-rate risk exposure at consistently low levels in a
wide range of interest-rate environments. The table below displays an example of how derivatives impacted the net
market value exposure for a 50 basis point parallel interest-rate shock. For additional information on our derivative
positions, see “ Note 9, Derivative Instruments .”
Derivative Impact on Interest-Rate Risk (50 Basis Points)
As of December 31, (1)
(Dollars in millions)
Before derivatives
$ (654)
$ (449)
After derivatives
(18)
(47)
Effect of derivatives
(1) Measured on the last business day of each period presented.
Earnings Exposure to Interest-Rate Risk
While we manage the interest-rate risk of our net portfolio with the objective of remaining neutral to movements in
interest rates and volatility on an economic basis, our earnings can experience volatility due to interest-rate changes
and differing accounting treatments that apply to certain financial instruments on our balance sheet. Specifically, we
have exposure to earnings volatility that is driven by changes in interest rates in two primary areas: our net portfolio and
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
MD&A | Risk Management | Market Risk Management, including Interest-Rate Risk Management
our consolidated MBS trusts. The exposure in the net portfolio is primarily driven by changes in the fair value of risk
management derivatives, mortgage commitments, and certain assets, primarily securities, that are carried at fair value.
The exposure related to our consolidated MBS trusts relates to changes in our credit loss reserves and to the
amortization of cost basis adjustments resulting from changes in interest rates.
We apply fair value hedge accounting to address some of the exposure to interest rates, particularly the earnings
volatility related to changes in benchmark interest rates. Our hedge accounting program is specifically designed to
address the volatility of our financial results associated with changes in fair value related to changes in these
benchmark interest rates. As such, earnings variability driven by other factors, such as spreads or changes in cost basis
amortization recognized in net interest income, remains. In addition, our ability to effectively reduce earnings volatility is
dependent upon the volume and type of interest-rate swaps available for hedging, which is driven by our interest-rate
risk management strategy discussed above. As our range of available interest-rate swaps varies over time, our ability to
reduce earnings volatility through hedge accounting may vary as well. When the shape of the yield curve shifts
significantly from period to period, hedge accounting may be less effective. In our current program, we establish new
hedging relationships each business day to provide flexibility in our overall risk management strategy.
See “ Note 1, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies ” and “ Note 9, Derivative Instruments ” for additional information
on our fair value hedge accounting policy and related disclosures.
Liquidity Risk Management
See “ Liquidity and Capital Management ” for a discussion of how we manage liquidity risk.
Operational Risk Management
Operational risk is the risk of loss resulting from inadequate or failed internal processes, people, systems, and third
parties, or disruptions from external events. Our corporate operational risk framework aligns with our Enterprise Risk
policy and has evolved based on the changing needs of our business and FHFA regulatory guidance. The Operational
Risk Management group is responsible for overseeing and monitoring compliance with our operational risk program’s
requirements. The Operational Risk Management group reports to the Chief Risk Officer and works in conjunction with
other second line teams, such as the Corporate Risk & Compliance division, to oversee and aggregate the full range of
operational risks, including fraud, resiliency, business interruptions, processing errors, damage to physical assets,
workplace safety and employment practices. To quantify our operational risk exposure, we rely on the Basel
Standardized Approach, which is based on a percentage of gross income. In addition, where we deem it appropriate, we
purchase insurance policies to mitigate the impact of operational losses.
We currently use artificial intelligence and machine learning techniques in our models that support a number of business
needs. Generative artificial intelligence, or generative AI, is an evolution of artificial intelligence that is rapidly developing
and is expected to transform the way many businesses operate and make decisions, creating both opportunities for and
risks to our business. We expect to gradually increase our use of artificial intelligence to support our business needs,
including using more advanced generative AI. Our initial uses of artificial intelligence have been focused on areas that
we believe pose lower risk, such as applications focused on improving operational efficiency and employee productivity.
We have enhanced our governance and controls to support the development and implementation of artificial intelligence
in our business processes, including implementing guiding ethical principles on the appropriate use of artificial
intelligence and enhancing our risk management framework. We believe the use of artificial intelligence tools has
significant potential to enhance employee productivity, improve our business processes, and change the way we
engage with our stakeholders. We also believe that if we do not effectively use and appropriately adopt artificial
intelligence and machine learning technologies in our business processes, it could result in a competitive disadvantage
to us.
See “ Risk Factors - Operational and Model Risk ” for more information regarding our operational risk, including risks
associated with artificial intelligence, and “ Risk Management -Overview-Risk Management Governance” for more
information regarding our governance of operational risk management. See “Cybersecurity” for a discussion of
cybersecurity risk management.
Model Risk Management
Model risk is the risk of potential adverse consequences (such as financial loss or reputational damage) due to:
inappropriate model design; errors in model coding, implementation, inputs or assumptions; inadequate model
performance; or incorrect use or application of model outputs or reports. The use of models requires numerous
assumptions and there are inherent limitations in any methodology used to estimate macroeconomic factors such as
home prices, multifamily property values, unemployment and interest rates, and their impact on borrower behavior.
When market conditions change rapidly and dramatically, the assumptions used by models may no longer accurately
capture or reflect the changing conditions. Given the challenges of predicting future behavior, management judgment is
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
MD&A | Risk Management | Model Risk Management
used throughout the modeling process, from model design decisions regarding core underlying assumptions, to
interpreting and applying final model output.
We manage model risk through a model risk management framework that establishes the roles and responsibilities for
managing model risk through the model management lifecycle, as well as related governance requirements. Under our
model risk management framework, model owners and users have responsibility for monitoring whether models are
performing accurately and complying with the framework’s control requirements. We have an independent model risk
management team within our Corporate Risk & Compliance division that is responsible for establishing and maintaining
the model risk management framework, as well as providing independent review and approval of models prior to use.
We also have a management-level Model Risk Committee that oversees risk management activities related to model
risk. In addition to internally-developed models, we also use third-party models.
While we employ strategies to manage and govern the risks associated with our use of models, they have not always
been fully effective. Errors were previously discovered in some of the models we use, and we continue to have
deficiencies in our current processes for managing model risk. We are currently working on a number of remediation
activities relating to our models, including improving our processes for model governance, development, implementation
and testing.
See “ Risk Factors - Operational and Model Risk ” for a discussion of the risks associated with the use of models,
including our use of third-party models and third-party data providers.
Critical Accounting Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires management to make a number of
judgments, estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets, liabilities, income and expenses in our
consolidated financial statements. Understanding our accounting policies and the extent to which we use management
judgment and estimates in applying these policies is integral to understanding our financial statements. We describe our
most significant accounting policies in “ Note 1, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies .”
We evaluate our critical accounting estimates and judgments required by our policies on an ongoing basis and update
them as necessary based on changing conditions. Management has discussed any significant changes in judgments
and assumptions in applying our critical accounting estimates with the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors. See
“ Risk Factors -General Risk” for a discussion of the risks associated with the need for management to make judgments
and estimates in applying our accounting policies and methods. We have identified one of our accounting estimates,
allowance for loan losses, as critical because it involves significant judgments and assumptions about highly complex
and inherently uncertain matters, and the use of reasonably different judgments and assumptions could have a material
impact on our reported results of operations or financial condition.
Allowance for Loan Losses
The allowance for loan losses is an estimate of single-family and multifamily HFI loan receivables that we expect will not
be collected related to loans held by Fannie Mae or by consolidated Fannie Mae MBS trusts. The expected credit losses
are deducted from the amortized cost basis of HFI loans to present the net amount expected to be received.
The allowance for loan losses involves substantial judgment on a number of matters including the development and
weighting of macroeconomic forecasts, the reversion period applied, the assessment of similar risk characteristics,
which determines the historic loss experience used to derive probability of loan default, the valuation of collateral, which
includes judgments about the property condition at the time of foreclosure, and the determination of a loan’s remaining
expected life. Our most significant judgments involved in estimating our allowance for loan losses relate to the modeled
macroeconomic data used to develop reasonable and supportable forecasts for key economic drivers, which are subject
to significant inherent uncertainty. Most notably, for single-family, the model uses forecasted single-family home prices
as well as a range of possible future interest rate environments. Fo r multifamily, the model uses forecasted net
operating income and property valuations. In developing a reasonable and supportable forecast, the model simulates
multiple paths of interest rates, rental income and property values based on current market conditions.
Quantitative Component
We use a discounted cash flow method to measure expected credit losses on our single-family mortgage loans and an
undiscounted loss method to measure expected credit losses on our multifamily mortgage loans.
Our modeled loan performance is based on our historical experience of loans with similar risk characteristics adjusted to
reflect current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts. Our historical loss experience and our loan loss
estimates capture the possibility of a multitude of events, including remote events that could result in credit losses on
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
MD&A | Critical Accounting Estimates
loans that are considered low risk. Our credit loss models, including the macroeconomic forecast data used as key
inputs, are subject to our model oversight and review processes as well as other established governance and controls.
Qualitative Component
Our process for measuring expected credit losses is complex and involves significant management judgment, including
a reliance on historical loss information and current economic forecasts that may not be representative of credit losses
we ultimately realize. Management adjustments may be necessary to take into consideration external factors and
current macroeconomic events that have occurred but are not yet reflected in the data used to derive the model outputs.
Qualitative factors and events not previously observed by the models through historical loss experience may also be
considered, as well as the uncertainty of their impact on credit loss estimates.
Macroeconomic Variables and Sensitivities
Our benefit or provision for credit losses can vary substantially from period to period based on forecasted
macroeconomic input s . For si ngle-family, we have determined that our most significant key macroeconomic inputs used
in determining our allowance for loan losses consist of: forecasted home price growth rates and interest rates. For
multifamily, we have determined that our most significant key macroeconomic inputs used in determining our allowance
for loan losses consist of: net operating income and property value growth rates.
In evaluating the sensitivities of our allowance to these macroeconomic inputs, it is difficult to estimate how potential
changes in any one factor or input might affect the overall credit loss estimates, because management considers a wide
variety of factors and inputs in estimating the allowance for loan losses. Changes in the factors and inputs considered
may not occur at the same rate and may not be consistent across all geographies or loan types, and changes in factors
and inputs may be directionally inconsistent, such that improvement in one factor or input may offset deterioration in
others. Changes in our assumptions and forecasts of economic conditions could significantly affect our estimate of
expected credit losses and lead to significant changes in the estimate from one reporting period to the next.
We provide more detailed information on our accounting for the allowance for loan losses in “ Note 1, Summary of
Significant Accounting Policies .” See “ Note 5, Allowance for Loan Losses ” for additional information about our current
period benefit (provision) for loan losses.
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
MD&A | Critical Accounting Estimates
Single-Family Sensitivities and Inputs
The table below provides information about our most significant key macroeconomic inputs used in determining our
single-family allowance for loan losses: forecasted home price growth rates and interest rates. Although the model
consumes a wide range of possible regional home price forecasts and interest rate scenarios that take into account
inherent uncertainty, the forecasts below represent the mean path of those simulations used in determining the
allowance for each quarter during the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023 , and how those forecasts have
changed between periods of estimate. Below we present our home price growth and interest rate estimates used in our
estimate of expected credit losses. Our forecasts include estimates for periods beyond 2026 that are not presented in
the table below.
Select Single-Family Macroeconomic Model Inputs (1)
Forecasted home price growth (decline) rate by period of estimate: (2)
For the Full Year ending December 31,
Fourth Quarter 2024
5.9 %
3.5 %
1.7 %
Third Quarter 2024
5.9
3.6
1.7
Second Quarter 2024
6.6
3.0
0.8
First Quarter 2024
4.8
1.5
*
For the Full Year ending December 31,
Fourth Quarter 2023
7.1 %
3.2 %
0.3 %
Third Quarter 2023
6.7
2.8
(0.4)
Second Quarter 2023
3.9
(0.7)
(1.5)
First Quarter 2023
(1.2)
(2.2)
(1.1)
Forecasted 30-year interest rates by period of estimate: (3)
Through the end
of December 31,
For the Full Year ending
December 31,
Fourth Quarter 2024
6.8 %
6.8 %
6.7 %
Third Quarter 2024
6.2
5.9
5.9
Second Quarter 2024
7.0
6.6
6.4
First Quarter 2024
6.8
6.4
6.2
Through the end
of December 31,
For the Full Year ending
December 31,
Fourth Quarter 2023
6.8 %
6.4 %
6.0 %
Third Quarter 2023
7.5
7.2
6.8
Second Quarter 2023
6.7
6.0
5.8
First Quarter 2023
6.2
5.7
5.5
* Represents less than 0.05% of home price growth (decline).
(1) These forecasts are provided solely for the purpose of providing insight into our credit loss model. Forecasts for future periods are subject
to significant uncertainty, which increases for periods that are further in the future. We provide our most recent forecasts for certain
macroeconomic and housing market conditions in “ Key Market Economic Indicators .” In addition, each month our Economic and Strategic
Research group provides its forecast of economic and housing market conditions, which are available in the “About Us/Research and
Insights” section of our website, www.fanniemae.com. Information on our website is not incorporated into this report.
(2) These estimates are based on our national home price index, which is calculated differently from the S&P CoreLogic Case-Shiller U.S.
National Home Price Index and therefore results in different percentages for comparable growth. We periodically update our home price
growth estimates and forecasts as new data become available. As a result, the forecast data in this table may also differ from the
forecasted home price growth rate presented in “ Key Market Economic Indicators ,” because that section reflects our most recent forecast
as of the filing date of this report, while this table reflects the quantitative forecast data we used in our model to estimate credit losses for
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
MD&A | Critical Accounting Estimates
the periods shown. Management continues to monitor macroeconomic updates to our inputs in our credit loss model from the time they are
approved as part of our established governance process, to ensure the reasonableness of the inputs used to calculate estimated credit
losses. The forecast data excludes the impact of any qualitative adjustments.
(3) Forecasted 30-year interest rates represent the mean of possible future interest rate environments that are simulated by our interest rate
model and used in the estimation of credit losses. Forecasts through the end of December 31, 2024 and 2023 , represent the average
forecasted rate from the quarter-end through the calendar year end of December 31st. The fourth quarter of 2024 and 2023 interest rates
represent the 30-year interest rate as of December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023 , respectively. This table reflects the forecasted
interest rate data we used in estimating credit losses for the periods shown and does not reflect changes in interest rates that occurred
after the forecast date.
As noted above, our single-family allowance for loan losses is sensitive to changes in home prices and interest rate
changes. We present in the table below the impact of hypothetical changes in home prices and 30-year interest rates,
with all other factors held constant.
Single-Family Sensitivities - Hypothetical Changes to Model Inputs
Forecasted change to the first 12 months of the forecast:
Allowance Impact
Approximate Change in Allowance
as of December 31, 2024 (1)
Change in home prices growth rate: (2)
+1%
3%
-1%
4%
Change in 30-year interest rates:
+0.5%
4%
-0.5%
4%
(1) Calculated as a percentage of our single-family allowance for loan losses.
(2) Change in home price shown on a normalized basis.
The above sensitivity analyses are hypothetical and are provided solely for the purpose of providing insight into our
credit loss model inputs. In addition, sensitivities for home price and interest rate changes are non-linear. As a result,
changes in these estimates are not always incrementally proportional. The purpose of this analysis is to provide an
indication of the impact of changes in home prices and 3 0-year interest r ates on the estimate of the single-family
allowance for credit losses. This analysis is not intended to imply management’s expectation of future changes in our
forecasts or any other variables that may change as a result.
See “ Key Market Economic Indicators ” for additional information about how home prices and interest rates can affect
our credit loss estimates, including a discussion of home price growth rates and our home price forecast. Also see
“ Consolidated Results of Operations - Benefit (Provision) for Credit Losses ” for information on how our home price and
interest rate forecasts impacted our single-family benefit (provision) for credit losses.
Multifamily Sensitivities and I nputs
The table below provides information about our most significant key macroeconomic inputs used in determining our
multifamily allowance for loan losses: multifamily property net operating income and property value growth rates.
Although the model consumes a wide range of possible future economic scenarios, the forecasts below represent the
mean path of those simulations used in determining the allowance during the years ended December 31, 2024 and
2023 , and how those forecasts have changed between periods of estimate. Our forecasts include estimates for periods
beyond those presented below.
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
MD&A | Critical Accounting Estimates
Select Multifamily Macroeconomic Model Inputs (1)
Forecasted net operating income growth (decline) rate by period of estimate:
For the Full Year ending December 31,
Fourth Quarter 2024
N/A
3.1 %
1.7 %
0.3 %
Fourth Quarter 2023
5.6 %
2.6 %
(0.2) %
N/A
Forecasted property value growth (decline) rate by period of estimate:
For the Full Year ending December 31,
Fourth Quarter 2024
N/A
(8.7) %
(1.1) %
3.7 %
Fourth Quarter 2023
(10.0) %
(4.4) %
1.9 %
N/A
N/A Not applicable. For purposes of this disclosure, we provide the forecasted net operating income growth rate and property value growth rate
for the period of estimate and the two years following the period of estimate.
(1) These forecasts are provided solely for the purpose of providing insight into our credit loss model. Forecasts for future periods are
subject to significant uncertainty, which increases for periods that are further in the future.
As noted above, our multifamily allowance for loan losses is sensitive to changes in net operating income and property
value changes. We present in the table below the impact of hypothetical changes in net operating income and property
value changes, with all other factors held constant.
Multifamily Sensitivities - Hypothetical Changes to Model Inputs
Forecasted change to the first 12 months of the forecast:
Allowance Impact
Approximate Change in Allowance
as of December 31, 2024 (1)
Change in net operating income growth rate:
+1%
2%
-1%
2%
Change in property value growth rate:
+1%
3%
-1%
3%
(1) Calculated as a percentage of our multifamily allowance for loan losses.
The above sensitivity analyses are hypothetical and are provided solely for the purpose of providing insight into our
credit loss model inputs. In addition, sensitivities for net operating income and property value changes are non-linear. As
a result, changes in these estimates are not always incrementally proportional. The purpose of this analysis is to provide
an indication of the impact of net operating income and property value changes on the estimate of the multifamily
allowance for credit losses. This analysis is not intended to imply management’s expectation of future changes in our
forecasts or any other variables that may change as a result.
See “ Consolidated Results of Operations - Benefit (Provision) for Credit Losses ” for information on how our NOI
forecast impacted our multifamily benefit (provision) for credit losses.
Impact of Future Adoption of New Accounting Guidance
We identify and discuss the expected impact on our c onsolidated financial statements of recently issued accounting
guidance in “Note 1, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies .”
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
MD&A | Glossary of Terms Used in This Report
Glossary of Terms Used in This Report
Terms used in this report have the following meanings, unless the context indicates otherwise.
“Agency mortgage-related securities” refers to mortgage-related securities issued by Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and
Ginnie Mae.
“Back-end credit risk transfer transactions” refers to credit enhancements that we obtain after acquiring a loan.
“Business volume” refers to the sum in any given period of the unpaid principal balance of: (1) the mortgage loans and
mortgage-related securities we purchase for our retained mortgage portfolio; (2) the mortgage loans we securitize into
Fannie Mae MBS that are acquired by third parties; and (3) credit enhancements that we provide on our mortgage
assets. It excludes mortgage loans we securitize from our retained mortgage portfolio and the purchase of Fannie Mae
MBS for our retained mortgage portfolio.
“Capital reserve end date” refers to the date that is the last day of the second consecutive fiscal quarter during which we
have had and maintained capital equal to, or in excess of, all of the capital requirements and buffers under the
enterprise regulatory capital framework.
“CEO” refers to Chief Executive Officer.
“CFO” refers to Chief Financial Officer.
“Connecticut Avenue Securities” or “CAS” refers to a type of security that allows Fannie Mae to transfer a portion of the
credit risk from loan reference pools, consisting of certain mortgage loans in our guaranty book of business, to third-
party investors.
“Connecticut Avenue Securities REMICs” or “CAS REMICs” refers to Connecticut Avenue Securities that are structured
as notes issued by trusts that qualify as REMICs.
“Conventional mortgage” refers to a mortgage loan that is not guaranteed or insured by the U.S. government or its
agencies, such as the VA, the FHA or the Rural Development Housing and Community Facilities Program of the
Department of Agriculture.
“COO” refers to Chief Operating Officer.
“Credit enhancement” refers to an agreement used to reduce credit risk by requiring collateral, letters of credit,
mortgage insurance, corporate guarantees, inclusion in a credit risk transfer transaction reference pool, or other
agreements to provide an entity with some assurance that it will be compensated to some degree in the event of a
financial loss.
“ Credit Insurance Risk Transfer ” or “ CIRT ” refers to insurance transactions whereby we obtain actual loss coverage on
pools of loans either directly from an insurance provider that retains the risk, or from an insurance provider that
simultaneously cedes all of its risk to one or more reinsurers.
“CRO” refers to Chief Risk Officer.
“Debt servi ce coverage ratio” or “ DSCR” refers to a ratio of net cash flow to the annualized debt service, which may
include both principal and interest payments, of a multifamily property.
“Deferred guaranty fee income” refers to income primarily from the upfront fees that we receive at the time of loan
acquisition related to single-family loan-level price adjustments or other fees we receive from lenders, which are
amortized over the contractual life of the loan. Deferred guaranty fee income also includes the amortization of cost basis
adjustments on our mortgage loans and debt of consolidated trusts that are not associated with upfront fees.
“Desktop Underwriter” or “ DU” refers to our proprietary automated underwriting system used by mortgage lenders to
evaluate the substantial majority of our single-family loan acquisitions.
“Delegated Underwriting and Servicing program” or “DUS program” refers to our multifamily business program whereby
DUS lenders, who must be pre-approved by us, are delegated the authority to underwrite and service loans for delivery
to us in accordance with our standards and requirements.
“Enterprise regulatory capital framework” refers to the regulatory capital framework established by FHFA applicable to
us that was initially published in December 2020 and subsequently amended in 2022 and 2023, as described in
“Business-Legislation and Regulation-Capital Requirements.”
“FHFA” refers to the Federal Housing Finance Agency. FHFA is an independent agency of the federal government with
general supervisory and regulatory authority over Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and the Federal Home Loan Banks. FHFA
is our safety and soundness regulator and our mission regulator. FHFA also has been acting as our conservator since
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
MD&A | Glossary of Terms Used in This Report
September 2008. For more information on FHFA’s authority as our conservator and as our regulator, see “ Business -
Conservatorship and Treasury Agreements ” and “ Business - Legislation and Regulation .”
“Front-end credit enhancements” refers to credit enhancements that we obtain at the time we acquire a loan.
“GSE” refers to the government-sponsored enterprises Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac.
“GSE Act” refers to the Federal Housing Enterprises Financial Safety and Soundness Act of 1992, as amended.
“Guaranty book of business” refers to the sum of the unpaid principal balance of: (1) Fannie Mae MBS outstanding
(excluding the portions of any structured securities Fannie Mae issues that are backed by Freddie Mac securities);
(2) mortgage loans of Fannie Mae held in our retained mortgage portfolio; and (3) other credit enhancements that we
provide on mortgage assets. It also excludes non-Fannie Mae mortgage-related securities held in our retained mortgage
portfolio for which we do not provide a guaranty.
“Guaranty fee income” or “g uaranty fees” refers to compensation we receive for assuming the credit risk on our single-
family and multifamily guaranty books of business that we recognize in net interest income. There are two components
of our single-family guaranty fee: (1) base fees, which are ongoing fees that factor into a mortgage loan’s interest rate
and are collected each month over the life of the mortgage loan; and (2) upfront fees, which are one-time payments
made by lenders upon loan delivery and are amortized into net interest income over the life of the loan. For multifamily
loans, base fees are the primary component of our guaranty fee. Multifamily guaranty fee income does not include
upfront fees.
“HFI loans” or “held-for-investment loans” refer to mortgage loans we acquire for which we have the ability and intent to
hold for the foreseeable future or until maturity.
“HFS loans” or “held-for-sale loans” refer to mortgage loans we acquire that we intend to sell or securitize via trusts that
will not be consolidated.
“ Low Income Housing Tax Credit program ” or “ LIHTC program ” refers to a federal program that encourages private
equity investment in creating and preserving affordable units throughout the country by awarding federal tax credits to
affordable housing developers, who then exchange those tax credits with corporate investors in return for capital
contributions.
“Loans,” “mortgage loans” and “mortgages” refer to both whole loans and loan participations, secured by residential real
estate, cooperative shares or by manufactured housing units.
“Loss reserves” consists of our allowance for loan losses and our reserve for guaranty losses.
“Mortgage assets,” when referring to our assets, refers to both mortgage loans and mortgage-related securities we hold
in our retained mortgage portfolio. For purposes of the senior preferred stock purchase agreement, the definition of
mortgage assets is based on the unpaid principal balance of such assets and does not reflect market valuation
adjustments, allowance for loan losses, impairments, unamortized premiums and discounts and the impact of our
consolidation of variable interest entities. Our mortgage asset calculation also includes 10% of the notional value of
interest-only securities we hold. We disclose the amount of our mortgage assets for purposes of the senior preferred
stock purchase agreement on a monthly basis in the “Endnotes” to our Monthly Summary reports, which are available
on our website.
“Mortgage-backed securities” or “MBS” refers generally to securities that represent beneficial interests in pools of
mortgage loans or other mortgage-related securities. These securities may be issued by Fannie Mae or by others.
“Multifamily Connecticut Avenue Securities” or “MCAS” refers to Connecticut Avenue Securities that are structured as
notes issued by trusts to transfer credit risk on our multifamily guaranty book of business to third-party investors.
“Multifamily mortgage loan” refers to a mortgage loan secured by a property containing five or more residential dwelling
units.
“New business purchases” refers to single-family and multifamily whole mortgage loans purchased during the period
and single-family and multifamily mortgage loans underlying Fannie Mae MBS issued during the period pursuant to
lender swaps.
“Notional amount” refers to the hypothetical dollar amount in an interest rate swap transaction on which exchanged
payments are based. The notional amount in an interest rate swap transaction generally is not paid or received by either
party to the transaction, or generally perceived as being at risk. The notional amount is typically significantly greater
than the potential market or credit loss that could result from such transaction.
“Outstanding Fannie Mae MBS” refers to the total unpaid principal balance of any type of mortgage-backed security that
we issue, including UMBS, Supers, REMICs and other types of single-family or multifamily mortgage-backed securities
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
MD&A | Glossary of Terms Used in This Report
that are held by third-party investors or in our retained mortgage portfolio. For securities held by third-party investors, it
excludes the portions of any structured securities Fannie Mae issues that are backed by Freddie Mac-issued securities.
“Private-label securities” refers to mortgage-related securities issued by entities other than agency issuers Fannie Mae,
Freddie Mac or Ginnie Mae.
“Refi Plus loans” refers to loans we acquired under our Refi Plus initiative, which offered refinancing flexibility to eligible
Fannie Mae borrowers who were current on their loans and who applied prior to the initiative’s December 31, 2018
sunset date. Refi Plus had no limits on maximum LTV ratio and provided mortgage insurance flexibilities for loans with
LTV ratios greater than 80%.
“REMIC” or “Real Estate Mortgage Investment Conduit” refers to a type of mortgage-related security in which interest
and principal payments from mortgages or mortgage-related securities are structured into separately traded securities.
“REO” refers to real-estate owned by Fannie Mae because we have foreclosed on the property or obtained the property
through a deed-in-lieu of foreclosure.
“Representations and warranties” refers to a lender’s assurance that a mortgage loan sold to us complies with the
standards outlined in our Mortgage Selling and Servicing Contract, which incorporates the Selling and Servicing Guides,
including underwriting and documentation. Violation of any representation or warranty is a breach of the lender contract,
including the warranty that the loan complies with all applicable requirements of the contract, which provides us with
certain rights and remedies.
“Retained mortgage portfolio” refers to the mortgage-related assets we own (excluding the portion of assets that back
mortgage-related securities owned by third parties).
“Single-family mortgage loan” refers to a mortgage loan secured by a property containing four or fewer residential
dwelling units.
“Structured Fannie Mae MBS” refers to Fannie Mae securitizations that are resecuritizations of UMBS, MBS, or
previously-issued structured securities. Our structured securities can be commingled-that is, they can include Freddie
Mac securities as part or all of the underlying collateral for the security.
“TCCA fees” refers to the expense recognized as a result of the 10 basis point increase in guaranty fees on all single-
family mortgages delivered to us on or after April 1, 2012 pursuant to the Temporary Payroll Tax Cut Continuation Act of
2011 and as extended by the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, which we pay to Treasury on a quarterly basis.
“ Uniform Mortgage-Backed Securities ” or “ UMBS ” refers to uniform single-family mortgage-backed securities issued by
Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac that are directly backed by fixed-rate mortgage loans and generally eligible for trading in the
to-be-announced (“TBA”) market.
“Write-off” refers to loan amounts written off as uncollectible bad debts. These loan amounts are removed from our
consolidated balance sheet and charged against our loss reserves when the balance is deemed uncollectible, which is
generally at foreclosure or other liquidation events (such as a deed-in-lieu of foreclosure or a short-sale). Also includes
write-offs related to the redesignation of loans from held for investment to held for sale.
“Yield maintenance fee s” refers to multifamily prepayment premiums, which are fees that a multifamily borrower typically
pays when they prepay their loan.

---

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
Information about market risk is set forth in “MD&A- Risk Management - Market Risk Management, including Interest-
Rate Risk Management .”

---

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
Our consolidated financial statements and notes thereto are included elsewhere in this annual report on Form 10-K as
described below in “Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules.”

---

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on
Accounting and Financial Disclosure
None.
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
Controls and Procedures

---

ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures
Overview
We are required under applicable laws and regulations to maintain controls and procedures, which include disclosure
controls and procedures as well as internal control over financial reporting, as further described below.
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Disclosure controls and procedures refer to controls and other procedures designed to provide reasonable assurance
that information required to be disclosed in the reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed,
summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and
procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to provide reasonable assurance that
information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated
and communicated to management, including o ur Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer , as appropriate, to
allow timely decisions regarding our required disclosure. In designing and evaluating our disclosure controls and
procedures, management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can
provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and management was required to apply
its judgment in evaluating and implementing possible controls and procedures.
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
As required by Rule 13a-15 under the Exchange Act, management has evaluated, with the participation of our Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures in effect as of
December 31, 2024 , the end of the period covered by this report. As a result of management’s evaluation, our Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective at
a reasonable assurance level as of December 31, 2024 , or as of the date of filing this report.
Our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of December 31, 2024 or as of the date of filing this report
because they did not adequately ensure the accumulation and communication to management of information known to
FHFA that is needed to meet our disclosure obligations under the federal securities laws. As a result, we were not able
to rely upon the disclosure controls and procedures that were in place as of December 31, 2024 , or as of the date of this
filing, and we continue to have a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting. This material
weakness is described in more detail below under “Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
-Description of Material Weakness.” Based on discussions with FHFA and the structural nature of this material
weakness, we do not expect to remediate this material weakness while we are under conservatorship.
Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Overview
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting.
Internal control over financial reporting, as defined in rules promulgated under the Exchange Act, is a process designed
by, or under the supervision of, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer and effected by our Board of
Directors, management and other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial
reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with GAAP. Internal control
over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that:
• pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and
dispositions of our assets;
• provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial
statements in accordance with GAAP, and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in
accordance with authorizations of our management and our Board of Directors; and
• provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or
disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on our financial statements.
Internal control over financial reporting cannot provide absolute assurance of achieving financial reporting objectives
because of its inherent limitations. Internal control over financial reporting is a process that involves human diligence
and compliance and is subject to lapses in judgment and breakdowns resulting from human failures. Internal control
over financial reporting also can be circumvented by collusion or improper override. Because of such limitations, there is
a risk that material misstatements may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis by internal control over financial
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
Controls and Procedures
reporting. However, these inherent limitations are known features of the financial reporting process, and it is possible to
design into the process safeguards to reduce, though not eliminate, this risk.
Our management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2024 . In
making its assessment, management used the criteria established in the Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued
by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”) in May 2013. Management’s
assessment of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2024 identified a material weakness,
which is described below. Because of this material weakness, management has concluded that our internal control over
financial reporting was not effective as of December 31, 2024 or as of the date of filing this report.
Our independent registered public accounting firm, Deloitte & Touche LLP, has issued an audit report on our internal
control over financial reporting, expressing an adverse opinion on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2024 . This report is included below under the heading “Report of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm.”
Description of Material Weakness
The Public Company Accounting Oversight Board’s Auditing Standard 2201 defines a material weakness as a
deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting such that there is a reasonable
possibility that a material misstatement of the company’s annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or
detected on a timely basis.
Management has determined that we continued to have the following material weakness as of December 31, 2024 , and
as of the date of filing this report:
• Disclosure Controls and Procedures. We have been under the conservatorship of FHFA since September 2008.
Under the GSE Act, FHFA is an independent agency that currently functions as both our conservator and our
regulator with respect to our safety, soundness and mission. Because of the nature of the conservatorship
under the GSE Act, which places us under the “control” of FHFA (as that term is defined by securities laws),
some of the information that we may need to meet our disclosure obligations may be solely within the
knowledge of FHFA. As our conservator, FHFA has the power to take actions without our knowledge that could
be material to our stockholders and other stakeholders, and could significantly affect our financial performance
or our continued existence as an ongoing business. Although we and FHFA attempted to design and implement
disclosure policies and procedures that would account for the conservatorship and accomplish the same
objectives as a disclosure controls and procedures policy of a typical reporting company, there are inherent
structural limitations on our ability to design, implement, operate and test effective disclosure controls and
procedures. As both our regulator and our conservator under the GSE Act, FHFA is limited in its ability to design
and implement a complete set of disclosure controls and procedures relating to Fannie Mae, particularly with
respect to current reporting pursuant to Form 8-K. Similarly, as a regulated entity, we are limited in our ability to
design, implement, operate and test the controls and procedures for which FHFA is responsible.
Due to these circumstances, we have not been able to update our disclosure controls and procedures in a
manner that adequately ensures the accumulation and communication to management of information known to
FHFA that is needed to meet our disclosure obligations under the federal securities laws, including disclosures
affecting our consolidated financial statements. As a result, we did not maintain effective controls and
procedures designed to ensure complete and accurate disclosure as required by GAAP as of December 31,
2024 , or as of the date of filing this report. Based on discussions with FHFA and the structural nature of this
weakness, we do not expect to remediate this material weakness while we are under conservatorship.
Mitigating Actions Related to Material Weakness
We and FHFA have engaged in the following practices intended to permit accumulation and communication to
management of information needed to meet our disclosure obligations under the federal securities laws:
• FHFA has established the Division of Conservatorship Oversight and Readiness, which is intended to facilitate
operation of the company with the oversight of the conservator.
• We have provided drafts of our SEC filings to FHFA personnel for their review and comment prior to filing. We
also have provided drafts of external press releases, statements and speeches to FHFA personnel for their
review and comment prior to release.
• FHFA personnel, including senior officials, have reviewed our SEC filings prior to filing, including this annual
report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024 (“ 2024 Form 10-K”), and engaged in discussions
regarding issues associated with the information contained in those filings. Prior to filing our 2024 Form 10-K,
FHFA provided Fannie Mae management with written acknowledgment that it had reviewed the 2024 Form 10-
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
Controls and Procedures
K, and it was not aware of any material misstatements or omissions in the 2024 Form 10-K and had no
objection to our filing the 2024 Form 10-K.
• Our senior management meets regularly with senior leadership at FHFA .
• FHFA representatives attend meetings frequently with various groups within the company to enhance the flow
of information and to provide oversight on a variety of matters, including accounting, credit and market risk
management, external communications and legal matters.
• Senior officials within FHFA’s Office of the Chief Accountant have met frequently with our senior finance
executives regarding our accounting policies, practices and procedures.
In view of these activities, we believe that our consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2024
have been prepared in conformity with GAAP.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Management has evaluated, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, whether
any changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during our last fiscal quarter have materially
affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. There were no changes
in our internal control over financial reporting from October 1, 2024 through December 31, 2024 that management
believes have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial
reporting.
In the ordinary course of business, we review our system of internal control over financial reporting and make changes
that we believe will improve these controls and increase efficiency, while continuing to ensure that we maintain effective
internal controls. Changes may include implementing new, more efficient systems, automating manual processes, and
updating existing systems.
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
Controls and Procedures
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To Fannie Mae:
Opinion on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of Fannie Mae and consolidated entities (in
conservatorship) (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2024, based on criteria established in Internal Control -
Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission
(COSO). In our opinion, because of the effect of the material weakness identified below on the achievement of the
objectives of the control criteria, the Company has not maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2024, based on the criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by
COSO.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United
States) (PCAOB), the consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2024, of the
Company and our report dated February 14, 2025, expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements and
included an explanatory paragraph regarding the Company’s dependence upon the continued support from the United
States Government through the United States Department of Treasury and the Federal Housing Finance Agency.
Basis for Opinion
The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its
assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying
Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the
Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with
the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal
securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was
maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial
reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating
effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered
necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding
the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies
and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the
transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are
recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of
management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely
detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on
the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.
Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may
deteriorate.
Material Weakness
A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such
that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the company’s annual or interim financial
statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. The following material weakness has been identified and
included in management’s assessment:
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
Controls and Procedures
• Disclosure Controls and Procedures - The Company’s disclosure controls and procedures did not adequately
ensure the accumulation and communication to management of information known to the Federal Housing
Finance Agency (as conservator) that is needed to meet their disclosure obligations under the federal securities
laws as they relate to financial reporting.
This material weakness was considered in determining the nature, timing, and extent of audit tests applied in our audit
of the consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2024, of the Company and this
report does not affect our report on such financial statements.
/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
McLean, Virginia
February 14, 2025
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
Other Information

---

ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 9B. Other Information
During the quarter ended December 31, 2024 , no Fannie Mae director or officer (as that term is defined by the SEC in
Rule 16a-1(f) under the Exchange Act) adopted or terminated a Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement or a non-Rule 10b5-1
trading arrangement for transactions in Fannie Mae securities.

---

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
Directors
Our current directors are listed below. They have provided the following information about their principal occupation,
business experience and other matters.
Priscilla Almodovar
Age 57
President and CEO
Director since December 2022
Board committees:
• Community Responsibility and Sustainability
Ms. Almodovar is a Senior Executive with over 30 years of expertise in finance, real estate and community development
across a number of leading institutions and organizations. She brings significant experience in business operations,
large complex organizations, audit and financial reporting, risk and asset management, human capital, and strategic
planning.
Experience and Qualifications
• President an d CEO of Enterprise Community Partners (2019-2022), a national organization focused on investing in
and increasing the supply of affordable housing
• Managing Director at JPMorgan Chase, Inc. (2010-2019), where she led two of the company’s national real estate
businesses
• President and CEO of the New York State Housing Finance Agency and the State of New York Mortgage Agency
(2007-2009)
• Partner at White & Case LLP (1990-2004 ), a global law firm, specializing in international project finance
• Member of the Board of Realty Income Corporation (2021-present), a real estate investment trust, where she also
serves as Chair of the Board’s Audit Committee. Former member of the Board of Directors (2021) and Audit
Committee of VEREIT, Inc., which was acquired by Realty Income Corporation
Amy E. Alving
Age 62
Independent director since October 2013
Board committees:
• Nominating and Corporate Governance (Vice Chair)
• Risk Policy and Capital (Chair)
Dr. Alving has over 30 years of experience in technology, cybersecurity, and governance in business, government and
academic roles, including as a senior executive, member of public, non-profit, and university boards, as well as a
tenured university faculty member.
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance | Directors
Experience and Qualifications
• Chief Technology Officer and Senior Vice President at Science Applications International Corporation (“SAIC”), now
known as Leidos Holdings, Inc., a scientific, engineering and technology applications company (2007-2013)
• Director of the Special Projects Office at the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (1998-2005)
• White House Fellow (1997-1998)
• Tenured faculty member at the University of Minnesota (1990-1999)
• Member of the Board of Directors of Howmet Aerospace, Inc. and its predecessor Arconic, Inc. (2016-2017, and
2018-present); member of the Governance and Nominating Committee and the Cybersecurity Committee
• Member of the Board of Directors of DXC Technology Company (2017-2023); member of Audit and Nominating &
Governance Committees and Chair of Risk Committee
• Member of the Board of Directors of Pall Corporation (2010-2015); member of the Audit Committee and the
Nominating/Governance Committee
• Member of the Department of the Air Force Scientific Advisory Board, a body that advises the Secretary of the Air
Force and other Air Force senior leaders on scientific and technical matters (2021-present)
• Trustee of Princeton University (2019-2023)
Christopher J. Brummer
Age 49
Independent director since February 2021
Board committees:
• Community Responsibility and Sustainability (Vice Chair)
• Risk Policy and Capital
Dr. Brummer has extensive experience in financial technology and the law. He brings expertise on the regulatory
dimensions of finance, trade, and global economic issues. He is a tenured university professor and has lent his
expertise to policymakers, founders, startups, and nonprofits.
Experience and Qualifications
• Professor at Georgetown University Law Center (2009-present), where he serves as Agnes N. Williams
Sesquicentennial Professor of Financial Technology and as Faculty Director of Georgetown’s Institute of
International Economic Law
• Nonresident Senior Fellow for the Atlantic Council’s GeoEconomics Center (2012-present)
• Member of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission’s Subcommittee on Virtual Currencies (2018-present)
• Advisory Council Member for the Alliance for Innovative Regulation (2021-present)
• Advisory group member for the Digital Dollar Project (2022-present)
• Advisor to the investment fund Paradigm Operations LP (2021-2023)
• Founder of DC Fintech Week, a public policy conference on finance and technology (2016-present)
• Co-founder of the Fintech Beat podcast and newsletter for CQ Roll Call (2019) and author of a number of
publications
• Member of the Biden-Harris Presidential Transition Team (2020-2021)
• Senior Fellow for the Milken Institute’s Center for Financial Markets (2011-2017)
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance | Directors
Renée Lewis Glover
Age 75
Independent director since January 2016
Board committees:
• Community Responsibility and Sustainability
• Nominating and Corporate Governance (Chair)
Ms. Glover is a thought leader in urban strategy and a sponsor of community transformation. She is an experienced
business leader and public servant known for influencing the national conversation about housing affordability and
economic development.
Experience and Qualifications
• Founder and Managing Member of The Catalyst Group, L LC (2015-present), a nation al consulting firm focused on
urban revitalization, real estate development and community building, urban policy, and business transformation
• Member of the Board of Directors of Tricon Residential Inc. (2021-May 2024); member of the Audit Committee and
the Compensation, Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
• Member of the Board of Trustees of Enterprise Community Partners, Inc. (2015-2022); member of the Executive
Committee; Chair of the Compensation and Human Resources Committee
• Member of the Board of Directors of Habitat for Humanity International (2006-2015); Chair of the Board of Directors
(2013-2015); member of the Audit, Finance, Operations and Executive Committees
• Member of the Board of Directors of the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta (2009-2014); member of the Audit and
Operational Risk Committee
• Commissioner of the Bipartisan Policy Center Housing Commission (2011-2014), which developed a set of
bipartisan recommendations concerning federal housing policy and housing finance
• President and CEO of the Atlanta Housing Authority and its affiliates (1994-2013)
• Corporate finance attorney in New York (1975-1986) and Atlanta (1986-1994)
• Member of the Board of Trustees of Starwood Waypoint Homes (2017); member of the Nominating and Corporate
Governance Committee and the Audit Committee
• Member of the Azimuth GRC Advisory Board (2020-present)
• Member of the Advisory Board for the J. Ronald Terwilliger Center for Housing Policy (2015-present)
• Member of the Advisory Board of the Penn Institute for Urban Research (until 2023)
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance | Directors
Michael J. Heid
Age 67
Independent director since May 2016
Board Chair since May 2022
Board committees:
• None
Mr. Heid serves as an alternate member of each Board committee for
the purpose of establishing a meeting quorum if needed.
M r. Heid has over 30 years of senior executive experience in highly complex financial services organizations operating
in a heavily regulated environment.
Experience and Qualifications
• Executive Vice President (Home Lending) of Wells Fargo & Company (1997-2016)
• Various positions at Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, the mortgage banking division of Wells Fargo, and predecessor
companies (1998-2016), including President (2011-2015), Co-President (2004-2011), and Chief Financial Officer
(“CFO”) and Head of Loan Servicing
• Member of the Board of Directors of GreenSky, Inc. (2024-current); member of the Audit and Credit Risk and Asset
Liability Committees; Chair of the Compliance Committee
• Member of the Advisory Board for Home Partners of America (2016-2023)
• Member of the Board of Directors of Roosevelt Management Company LLC (2016-2023); Chair of the Risk
Committee; member of the Strategy Committee
Simon Johnson
Age 62
Independent director since February 2021
Board committees:
• Audit (Vice Chair)
• Risk Policy & Capital
Dr. Johnson is a global economist who brings expertise in entrepreneurship, finance, and policy-related matters. His
experience includes advising private nonpartisan organizations and serving as a tenured university professor. In 2024,
he won the Nobel Prize in Economics.
Experience and Qualifications
• Professor at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (“MIT”) Sloan School of Management (1997-present),
Ronald A. Kurtz Professor of Entrepreneurship and Head of the Global Economics and Management Group at the
MIT Sloan School of Management (2004-present)
• Research Associate for the National Bureau of Economic Research, a private nonpartisan organization that
facilitates cutting-edge investigation and analysis of major economic issues (2009-present)
• Member of the Center for a New Economy’s Growth Commission on Puerto Rico (2017-2019)
• Member of the Financial Research Advisory Committee of the U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Financial
Research (2014-2016); Chair of the Global Vulnerabilities Working Group
• Member of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation’s Systemic Resolution Advisory Committee (2011-2016)
• Member of the Congressional Budget Office’s Panel of Economic Advisers (2009-2015)
• Senior follow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics (2008-2019)
• Chief Economist at the International Monetary Fund (2007-2008)
• Co-chair of the CFA Institute Systemic Risk Council, a public interest group that monitors progress on the
implementation of financial reforms (2022-present)
• Advisory Board member for the Institute for New Economic Thinking (2010-present)
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance | Directors
Karin J. Kimbrough
Age 56
Independent director since March 2019
Board committees:
• Community Responsibility and Sustainability (Chair)
• Compensation and Human Capital (Vice Chair)
Ms. Kimbrough is an economist with over 20 years of experience in business, banking, and finance. She provides
extensive private and public sector experience focused on consumer trends and financial and capital markets, as well
as expertise in financial stability risk assessments.
Experience and Qualifications
• Chief Economist for LinkedIn Corporation (2020-present)
• Assistant Treasurer for Google (2017-2019)
• Managing Director and Head of Macroeconomic Policy at Bank of America Merrill Lynch (2014-2017)
• Various positions at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, including Vice President and a director for the Financial
Stability Monitoring Function in the Markets Group (2010-2014) and Manager for Analytical Development (2005-
2010)
• Economist and strategist at Morgan Stanley (2000-2005)
• Member of the Board of Directors of Bread Financial Holdings, Inc. (2021-2023); member of the Compensation and
Risk Committees
• Member of the Board of Directors of the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco (2024-present); member of the
Audit & Risk Management Committee
• Member of the Board of Directors of the National Bureau of Economic Research (2023-present)
• Member of the academic advisory council of the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (2023-present)
Diane N. Lye
Age 63
Independent director since May 2024
Board committees:
• Audit
• Risk Policy and Capital
Dr. Lye has over 30 years of experience in data science and technology. She brings experience from a variety of
technology-centered leadership roles where she has transformed data and analytics technology environments through
big data and machine learning technology.
Experience and Qualifications
• Chief Information Officer at Rivian Automotive, Inc., an electric vehicle manufacturer (2022-2023)
• Various positions at Capital One, N.A., including Executive Vice President and Chief Information Officer for Card
Technology (2019-2022) and Senior Vice President of Enterprise Data, Machine Learning, Risk and Finance
Technology (2016-2019)
• Variety of technology-centered leadership roles at Amazon, Citigroup, and Bank of America (2001-2016)
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance | Directors
Diane C. Nordin
Age 66
Independent director since November 2013; Board Vice Chair since April 2019
Board committees:
• Audit
• Compensation and Human Capital (Chair)
Ms. Nordin also serves as an alternate member of each other Board committee
for the purpose of establishing a meeting quorum if needed.
Ms. Nordin brings extensive experience in accounting and finance, talent management, and executive compensation.
She has over 30 years of experience as a chartered financial analyst, as well as in executive roles in asset
management and financial service companies.
Experience and Qualifications
• Various positions of increasing authority at private asset management company Wellington Management Company,
LLP after joining in 1991, including Partner (1995-2011), head of Fixed Income, Vice Chair of the Compensation
Committee, and Audit Chair of the Wellington Management Trust Company
• Fidelity Investments and Putnam Investments (1980-1991)
• Member of the Board of Directors of Principal Financial Group, Inc. (2017-present); Chair of the Audit Committee;
member of the Finance Committee
• Member of the Board of Directors of Antares Midco, Inc. (2016-present); Chair of the Compensation Committee
• Trustee of the Financial Accounting Foundation (2022-present)
• Chair of the Board of Governors of the CFA Institute (2019-2020); Chair of the Governance Committee
• Advanced Leadership Initiative Fellow at Harvard University (2011-2012)
• Chartered Financial Analyst
Chetlur “Chet” S. Ragavan
Age 70
Independent director since June 2023
Board committees:
• Nominating and Corporate Governance
• Risk Policy and Capital (Vice Chair)
Mr. Ragavan brings over 30 years of experience in risk management at financial services institutions with expertise
including significant risk oversight, financial services acumen, and broad strategic execution.
Experience and Qualifications
• Founder and Principal of Risk Response LLC (2019), which provides risk advisory and consulting services to global
financial institutions
• Executive Vice President and Chief Risk Officer (“CRO”) of Voya Financial, Inc. (formerly known as ING U.S., Inc.)
(2014-2019)
• Managing Director and CRO for Voya Investment Management (2008-2014)
• Managing Director and Co-Head of the Portfolio Analytics Group for BlackRock (2006-2008)
• Various positions of increasing authority at Merrill Lynch beginning in 1980, which include Managing Director and
Global Head of Fixed-Income Research of Merrill Lynch Investment Managers (2000-2006) and Managing Director
and Head of Risk Management of Merrill Lynch Asset Management (1992-2000)
• Member of the Board of Directors of CNO Financial Group, Inc. (2021-present); Chair of the Audit and Enterprise
Risk Committee; member of the Investment Committee
• Member of the Board of the Council for Economic Education (2016-present)
• Chartered Financial Analyst
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance | Directors
Manuel “Manolo” Sánchez Rodríguez
Age 59
Independent director since September 2018
Board committees:
• Compensation and Human Capital
• Nominating and Corporate Governance
Mr. Sánchez has extensive experience in the banking industry, including real estate, community, corporate, and
investment banking. He brings global insight, as well as his in-depth knowledge of banking and finance.
Experience and Qualifications
• President and CEO of Compass Bank, Inc. (“Compass Bank”), a U.S. subsidiary of Banco Bilbao Vizcaya
Argentaria, S.A. (“BBVA”) (2008-2017); Member of BBVA’s worldwide Executive Committee; Country Manager for
U.S. operations (2010-2017); Chairman of the Board of Directors of Compass Bank and its holding company, BBVA
Compass Bancshares, Inc. (2010-2017)
• Adjunct Professor at Rice University’s Jones Graduate School of Business (2018-present), where he teaches
disruption in financial services with a focus on crypto currencies and blockchain
• Member of the Board of Directors of Stewart Information Services Corporation (2019-present); member of the Audit
Committee and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
• Member of the Board of Directors of Affirm Holdings, Inc. (2023-present); member of the Audit Committee and the
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
• Member of the Board of Directors of Elevate Credit, Inc. (2021-2023)
• Member of the Board of Directors of BanCoppel S.A. Institución de Banca Múltiple in Mexico City (2019-2021)
• Member of the Board of Directors of On Deck Capital, Inc. (2018-2020); member of the Audit Committee and the
Compensation Committee
• Founder of Adelante Ventures LLC (2018)
Michael A. Seelig
Age 62
Independent director since March 2023
Board committees:
• Audit (Chair)
• Compensation and Human Capital
Mr. Seelig recently retired as a senior executive and partner at a global accounting firm. He has over 35 years of diverse
experience serving clients in the financial services industry, with duties including risk navigation, regulatory matters, and
financial reporting.
Experience and Qualifications
• Partner at PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (1997-2022); served in a variety of leadership roles within
PricewaterhouseCoopers, where he was responsible for driving various aspects of the firm’s strategy and
operations in several national, market and sector-based capacities
• Member of the Audit Committee of the University of Florida Foundation Board (2023-present); Vice Chair
• Licensed certified public accountant
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance | Directors
Scott D. Stowell
Age 67
Independent director since November 2024
Board committees:
• Community Responsibility and Sustainability
• Nominating and Corporate Governance
Mr. Stowell has nearly 40 years of experience in the U.S. homebuilding industry, including single-family homes, mixed-
use communities, and projects meeting local governments’ affordability requirements.
Experience and Qualifications
• Founder, CEO, and President of Capital Thirteen LLC, an advisory, real estate, and angel investing company
(2019-present)
• Executive chairman of CalAtlantic Group, Inc., a publicly-traded company that specialized in homebuilding (2015-
2018); after CalAtlantic Group’s merger with Lennar Corporation, retired as executive chairman and served on the
board of directors of Lennar Corporation (2018-2021)
• Various positions at Standard Pacific Homes (CalAtlantic Group’s predecessor) beginning in 1986, including as
CEO (2012-2015), President (2011-2015), and Chief Operating Officer (“COO”) (2007-2011)
• HomeAid America Inc., a non-profit organization whose mission is to help people experiencing or at risk of
homelessness build new lives through construction, community engagement, and education: member of the Board
of Directors (2013-current), former Executive Committee member (2013-2023), past Chair (2017-2018)
• Member of the Board of Directors at Toll Brothers, Inc., a home-building company (2021-present); lead independent
director and member of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
• Board member of Pacific Mutual Holding Company (2013-present); member of the Governance and Nominating
Committee and Chair of the Talent Development and Compensation Committee
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance | Corporate Governance
Corporate Governance
Conservatorship and Board Authorities
Overview
In September 2008, the FHFA Director appointed FHFA as our conservator in accordance with the GSE Act. As
conservator, FHFA succeeded to all rights, titles, powers and privileges of Fannie Mae, and of any stockholder, officer or
director of Fannie Mae with respect to Fannie Mae and its assets. As a result, our Board of Directors no longer had the
power or duty to manage, direct or oversee our business and affairs.
As conservator, FHFA reconstituted our Board of Directors and provided the Board with specified functions and
authorities. Our directors serve on behalf of the conservator and exercise their authority as directed by and with the
approval, where required, of the conservator. Our directors owe their fiduciary duties of care and loyalty solely to the
conservator. Thus, while we are in conservatorship, the Board has no fiduciary duties to the company or its
stockholders.
Our Board of Directors exercises specified functions and authorities provided to it pursuant to an order from FHFA, as
our conservator.
FHFA Instructions
The conservator also provided instructions regarding matters for which conservator decision or notification is required.
The conservator retains the authority to amend or withdraw its order and instructions at any time.
FHFA’s instructions require that we obtain the conservator’s decision before taking action on matters that require the
consent of or consultation with Treasury under the senior preferred stock purchase agreement. See “ Business -
Conservatorship and Treasury Agreements - Treasury Agreements - Covenants ” for matters that require the approval of
Treasury under the senior preferred stock purchase agreement.
FHFA’s instructions also require us to obtain the conservator’s decision before taking action in the areas identified
below. FHFA’s instructions specify that our Board (or in some cases a Board committee) must review and approve the
matters listed below before we request FHFA decision:
• redemptions or repurchases of our subordinated debt, except as may be necessary to comply with the senior
preferred stock purchase agreement;
• creation of any subsidiary or affiliate, or entering into a substantial transaction with a subsidiary or affiliate,
except for routine ongoing transactions with CSS or the creation of, or a transaction with, a subsidiary or
affiliate undertaken in the ordinary course of business;
• changes to or removal of Board risk limits that would result in an increase in the amount of risk that we may
take;
• retention and termination of the external auditor;
• terminations of law firms serving as consultants to the Board;
• proposed amendments to our bylaws or to charters of our Board committees;
• setting or increasing the compensation or benefits payable to members of the Board; and
• establishing the annual operating budget.
For the following matters, FHFA’s instructions require us to obtain the conservator’s decision, and the Board is expected
to determine the appropriate level of its engagement:
• material changes in accounting policy;
• proposed changes in our business operations, activities, and transactions that in the reasonable business
judgment of management are more likely than not to result in a significant increase in credit, market,
reputational, operational or other key risks;
• matters that impact or question the conservator’s powers, our conservatorship status, the legal effect of the
conservatorship, interpretations of the senior preferred stock purchase agreement or the Financial Agency
Agreement with Treasury or our performance under the Financial Agency Agreement;
• agreements relating to litigation, lawsuits, claims, demands, prosecutions, regulatory proceedings or tax
matters where the amount in dispute exceeds a specified threshold, including related matters that aggregate to
more than the threshold;
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance | Corporate Governance
• mergers, acquisitions and changes in control of key counterparties where we have a direct contractual right to
cease doing business with the entity or object to the merger or acquisition;
• changes to requirements, policies, frameworks, standards or products that are aligned with Freddie Mac’s,
pursuant to FHFA’s direction;
• credit risk transfer transactions that are a new transaction type, involve a material change in terms, or involve a
new type of collateral;
• transfers of mortgage servicing rights that meet minimum size thresholds and would increase the transferee’s
servicing of Fannie Mae seriously delinquent loans by more than a specified threshold; and
• changes in employee compensation that could significantly impact our employees, including special incentive
plans, merit increase pool funding, and retention awards for executives.
FHFA’s instructions also require us to provide timely notice to FHFA of: activities that represent a significant change in
current business practices, operations, policies or strategies not otherwise addressed in the instructions; exceptions and
waivers to aligned requirements, policies, frameworks, standards or products if not otherwise submitted to FHFA for
decision as required above; and accounting error corrections to previously-issued financial statements that are not de
minimis. FHFA will then determine whether any such items require its decision as conservator. For more information on
the conservatorship, refer to “ Business - Conservatorship and Treasury Agreements .”
Composition of Board of Directors
FHFA has directed that our Board of Directors should have a minimum of nine and not more than thirteen directors.
There is a non-executive Chair of the Board and Vice Chair of the Board, and our President and CEO is the only
corporate officer serving as a director. Our Corporate Governance Guidelines, in accordance with FHFA corporate
governance regulations, require a majority of Fannie Mae’s directors to be independent. The Board currently has
thirteen members, all of whom are independent except for our President and CEO. See “Certain Relationships and
Related Transactions, and Director Independence-Director Independence” for more information about our
independence requirements and our directors’ independence.
Under the Charter Act, each director is elected for a term ending on the date of our next annual stockholders’ meeting.
Fannie Mae’s bylaws provide that each director holds office for the term for which they were elected or appointed, and
will hold office until their successor is chosen and qualified, or until the Board member’s earlier resignation, retirement,
removal, or death. Following our entry into conservatorship in 2008, the conservator appointed an initial group of
directors to our Board, provided the Board with the authority to appoint directors to subsequent vacancies subject to
conservator review, and defined the term of service of directors during conservators hip. The conservator’s 2008 order
provides that each director serves on the Board until the earlier of (1) resignation or removal by the conservator or
(2) the election of a successor director at an annual meeting of stockholders. FHFA as our conservator has all powers of
our stockholders and suspended stockholder meetings after we entered into conservatorship. As a result, we have not
held stockholders’ meetings since that time. Subsequent vacancies have been, and may continue to be, filled by the
Board, subject to review by the conservator.
We implemented an annual election schedule for Board members in 2024. In December 2024, FHFA, exercising the
voting power of holders of our common stock, elected each of our current Board members. Ea ch Board m ember will
serve for a term that ends on the date of our next annual stockholders’ meeting, or when the conservator next elects our
Board members by written consent. This schedule replaces a three-year term limit established in 2021 for some of our
Board members. Ms. Almodovar’s service on the Board ceases at the termination of her employment as CEO unless
otherwise requested by the Board.
Absent a waiver from FHFA, FHFA corporate governance regulations limit service on our Board to ten years or age 72,
whichever comes first. FHFA has approved waivers of the Board age limit to allow Ms. Glover to serve on the Board
until November 2025 and Mr. Ragavan until May 2029. FHFA has also approved waivers of the ten-year Board term limit
to allow Ms. Alving to serve through October 2026, Ms. Nordin through November 2026, and Mr. Heid until May 2029.
In determining whether to recommend a director for reelection, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
will consider, among other factors, (1) the director’s independence, (2) the director’s willingness to continue to serve on
the Board and devote the necessary time , including their attendance at Board and Board committee meetings and
whether their service on outside boards and other activities permits them sufficient time to continue to serve on the
Board, (3) the contributions they have made to Board and Committee discussions and decision-making, (4) their
continued involvement in business and professional activities relevant to Fannie Mae, (5) the skills and experience that
should be represented on the Board, and (6) the diversity in ideas and perspectives represented on the Board .
Under the Charter Act, our Board shall at all times have as members at least one person from each of the homebuilding,
mortgage lending and real estate industries, and at least one person from an organization that has represented
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance | Corporate Governance
consumer or community interests for not less than two years or one person who has demonstrated a career
commitment to the provision of housing for low-income households. In addition, under our Corporate Governance
Guidelines, the Board as a group must be knowledgeable in business, finance, capital markets, accounting, risk
management, public policy, mortgage lending, real estate, low-income housing, homebuilding, regulation of financial
institutions, technology, and any other areas as may be relevant to the safe and sound operation of Fannie Mae. In
addition to expertise in the areas noted above, our Corporate Governance Guidelines specify that the Nominating and
Corporate Governance Committee also seeks prospective Board candidates who possess the highest personal values,
judgment and integrity, and who understand the regulatory and policy environment in which Fannie Mae does business.
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee also considers whether a prospective Board candidate has the
ability to attend meetings and fully participate in the activities of the Board.
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee also considers diversity when evaluating the composition of the
Board. Under our Corporate Governance Guidelines, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is
committed to considering minorities, women and individuals with disabilities in identifying prospective Board candidates,
and the Committee also seeks Board members who represent diversity in ideas and perspectives. These provisions of
our Corporate Governance Guidelines implement FHFA regulations that require us to implement and maintain policies
and procedures that, among other things, encourage the consideration of diversity in nominating or soliciting nominees
for positions on our Board.
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee evaluates the qualifications and performance of current
directors on an annual basis, taking into consideration factors related to a Board member’s contribution to the effective
functioning of the Board. Ms. Almodovar serves as a member of our Board of Directors in connection with her role as
our CEO. In its assessment of our independent directors and its evaluation of potential candidates for director, the
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee also considers each individual’s particular experience, qualifications,
attributes and skills in areas identified in our Corporate Governance Guidelines and listed in the table below. In
concluding our independent directors should serve as directors, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
took into account their expertise in these areas, which our directors gained from their experience described in
“ Directors .”
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance | Corporate Governance
Director Experience, Qualifications, Attributes and Skills
Board Leadership Structure
FHFA corporate governance regulations and our Corporate Governance Guidelines require separate Chair of the Board
and CEO positions and require that the Chair of the Board be an independent director. A non-executive Chair structure
enables non-management directors to raise issues and concerns for Board consideration without immediately involving
management and is consistent with the Board’s emphasis on independent oversight of management, including
independent risk oversight.
Our Board has five standing committees: the Audit Committee, the Community Responsibility and Sustainability
Committee, the Compensation and Human Capital Committee, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee,
and the Risk Policy and Capital Committee. Pursuant to FHFA direction, with such exceptions as the conservator may
direct, the Board and the standing Board committees function in accordance with:
• their designated duties and authorities as set forth in the Charter Act, other applicable federal law, FHFA’s
corporate governance rules, FHFA’s prudential management and operations standards, FHFA written
supervisory guidance and direction, and, to the extent not inconsistent with the foregoing, Delaware law (insofar
as Fannie Mae has adopted its provisions for corporate governance purposes);
• Fannie Mae’s bylaws and the applicable charters of Fannie Mae’s Board committees; and
• such other duties or authorities as the conservator may provide.
Such duties or authorities may be modified by the conservator at any time.
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance | Corporate Governance
Committee Charters and Corporate Governance
Our Corporate Governance Guidelines and charters for each of the Board’s standing committees are posted on our
website, www.fanniemae.com, in the “About Us-Corporate Governance” section. Although our equity securities are no
longer listed on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”), we are required by FHFA corporate governance regulations to
follow specified NYSE corporate governance requirements relating to, among other things, the independence of our
directors and the charter, independence, composition, expertise, duties, responsibilities and other requirements of our
Board committees.
Risk Management Oversight
Our Board of Directors oversees risk management primarily through the Risk Policy and Capital Committee of the
Board. FHFA corporate governance regulations set forth risk management requirements for our Board and our Risk
Policy and Capital Committee, as described below. These regulations require that our Board approve, have in effect at
all times, and periodically review an enterprise-wide risk management program that establishes our risk appetite, aligns
the risk appetite with our strategies and objectives, and addresses our exposure to credit risk, market risk, liquidity risk,
business risk and operational risk. Our risk management program must align with our risk appetite and include risk
limitations appropriate to each line of business, appropriate policies and procedures relating to risk management
governance, risk oversight infrastructure, and processes and systems for identifying and reporting risks, including
emerging risks. Our program must also include provisions for monitoring compliance with our risk limit structure and
policies relating to risk management governance, risk oversight, and effective and timely implementation of corrective
actions. Additional provisions must specify management’s authority and independence to carry out risk management
responsibilities and the integration of risk management with management’s goals and compensation structure. FHFA
corporate governance regulations require our Risk Policy and Capital Committee to assist the Board in carrying out its
oversight of our risk management program. These regulations also require that our Risk Policy and Capital Committee
must:
• be chaired by a director not serving Fannie Mae in a management capacity;
• have at least one member with risk management experience that is commensurate with our capital structure,
risk appetite, complexity, activities, size and other appropriate risk-related factors;
• have committee members with a practical understanding of risk management principles and practices relevant
to Fannie Mae;
• fully document and maintain records of its meetings; and
• report directly to the Board and not as part of, or combined with, another committee.
FHFA corporate governance regulations set forth specific responsibilities for our Risk Policy and Capital Committee,
including that it must:
• periodically review and recommend for Board approval an appropriate enterprise-wide risk management
program that is commensurate with our capital structure, risk appetite, complexity, activities, size and other
appropriate risk-related factors;
• receive and review regular reports from our CRO; and
• periodically review the capabilities for, and adequacy of resources allocated to, enterprise-wide risk
management.
Our Risk Policy and Capital Committee Charter also sets forth the Risk Policy and Capital Committee’s duties and
responsibilities in overseeing risk management for all of our major categories of risk and any other emerging risks. For
more information on the role of our Board and management in risk oversight, see “MD&A- Risk Management -
Overview- Risk Management Governance ” and “Cybersecurity-Cybersecurity Governance-Board Oversight.”
Human Capital Management Oversight
The Compensation and Human Capital Committee of the Board has oversight of Fannie Mae’s human capital
management. As part of its oversight role, the Committee reviews our primary compensation programs and benefits,
succession planning for executives, as well as corporate culture and employee engagement.
Audit Committee Membership
Our Board of Directors has a standing Audit Committee consisting of Mr. Seelig, who is the Chair, Dr. Johnson, who is
the Vice Chair, Dr. Lye, and Ms. Nordin. Mr. Heid also serves as an alternate member of the Audit Committee for the
purpose of establishing a meeting quorum if needed. All of the Audit Committee members are financially literate and
independent under the requirements of independence set forth in FHFA corporate governance regulations (which
requires the standard of independence adopted by the NYSE), Fannie Mae’s Corporate Governance Guidelines, and
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance | Corporate Governance
other SEC rules and regulations applicable to audit committees. The Board has determined that Mr. Seelig, Dr.
Johnson, Ms. Nordin, and Mr. Heid each have the requisite experience, as discussed in “Directors,” to qualify as an
“audit committee financial expert” under the rules and regulations of the SEC and has designated each of them as such.
Executive Sessions
Our non-management directors meet in executive session on a regularly scheduled basis. Our Board of Directors
reserves time for an executive session at every regularly scheduled in-person Board meeting. The non-executive Chair
of the Board presides over these sessions.
Communications with Directors or Audit Committee
Interested parties wishing to communicate any concerns or questions about Fannie Mae to the non-executive Chair of
the Board or to our non-management directors individually or as a group may do so by electronic mail addressed to
“board@fanniemae.com,” or by U.S. mail addressed to Board of Directors, c/o Office of the Corporate Secretary, Fannie
Mae, 1100 15th Street, NW, Washington, DC 20005. Communications may be addressed to a specific director or
directors, including Mr. Heid, the Board Chair, or to groups of directors, such as the independent or non-management
directors.
Interested parties wishing to communicate with the Audit Committee regarding accounting, internal accounting controls
or auditing matters may do so by electronic mail addressed to “auditcommittee@fanniemae.com,” or by U.S. mail
addressed to Audit Committee, c/o Office of the Corporate Secretary, Fannie Mae, 1100 15th Street, NW, Washington,
DC 20005.
The Office of the Corporate Secretary is responsible for processing all communications to a director or directors.
Communications that are deemed by the Office of the Corporate Secretary to be commercial solicitations, ordinary
course customer inquiries or complaints, incoherent or obscene are not forwarded to directors.
Director Nominations; Stockholder Proposals
Under the GSE Act, FHFA, as conservator, has all rights, titles, powers and privileges of the stockholders and Board of
Directors of Fannie Mae. As a result, Fannie Mae’s common stockholders no longer have the ability to recommend
director nominees or elect the directors of Fannie Mae or bring business before any meeting of stockholders pursuant to
the procedures in our bylaws. We currently do not plan to hold an annual meeting of stockholders in 2025 .
Codes of Conduct
We have a Code of Conduct that is applicable to all officers and employees (our “Employee Code of Conduct”) and a
Code of Conduct for the Board of Directors (our “Director Code of Conduct”). Our Employee Code of Conduct also
serves as the code of ethics for our CEO and senior financial officers required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and
implementing regulations of the SEC. We have posted these codes on our website, at www.fanniemae.com, in “About
Us-Corporate Governance-Code of Conduct,” which is also where w e intend to provide any required disclosure about
waivers of or amendments to these codes.
Insider Trading Policy , including Prohibitions against Hedging and Pledging
We have policies and procedures that govern the purchase, sale, and other disposition of Fannie Mae securities by our
directors, officers, or employees. These policies and procedures also provide that we take steps to manage the flow of
information to employees authorized to engage in certain trades on behalf of Fannie Mae. We believe these policies and
procedures are reasonably designed to promote compliance with insider trading laws, rules, regulations and applicable
listing standards. A copy of our Insider Trading Policy is filed with this report as Exhibit 19.
Among other provisions, our Insider Trading Policy prohibits all Fannie Mae employees, officers and directors from:
• buying or selling Fannie Mae securities while in possession of material, nonpublic information or outside of
applicable trading windows;
• engaging in short-term or speculative transactions relating to Fannie Mae securities:
◦ options, puts, calls or other derivative securities;
◦ short sales;
◦ hedging transactions such as prepaid variable forwards, equity swaps, collars and exchange funds,
and other derivatives; and
• holding Fannie Mae securities in an account with a margin loan balance or otherwise pledging Fannie Mae
securities as collateral for a loan.
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance | Report of the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors
Report of the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors
The Audit Committee’s charter sets forth the Audit Committee’s duties and responsibilities, and provides that the Audit
Committee’s purpose is to:
• oversee (a) our accounting, reporting, and financial practices and those of our subsidiaries, including the
integrity of our financial statements and internal control over financial reporting, (b) our compliance with legal
and regulatory requirements, (c) the external auditor’s qualifications, independence, and performance, and
(d) the qualifications, independence, and performance of our internal audit function and chief audit executive;
• approve, or recommend for Board approval, as appropriate, certain of our policies relating to the Audit
Committee’s oversight of the external auditor relationship, internal audit function, and the compliance
department; and
• prepare the report required by the rules of the SEC to be included in our annual proxy statement in years in
which Fannie Mae holds an Annual Meeting of Stockholders and files a proxy statement.
In accordance with this purpose, the Audit Committee has the authority to appoint, compensate, retain, oversee,
evaluate and terminate our independent external auditor (referred to as the “independent auditor”); however, the Audit
Committee is required to consult and obtain the decision of the conservator before exercising some of these authorities.
The independent auditor reports directly to the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee is responsible for fee
negotiations with the independent auditor and pre-approves the fees for and the terms of all audit and permissible non-
audit services to be provided by the independent auditor. The Audit Committee has delegated to its Chair the authority
to pre-approve such services up to $1 million per engagement, which pre-approval must be ratified by the Audit
Committee at its next scheduled meeting. The Audit Committee has the authority to retain counsel, accountants, experts
and other advisors to assist the Audit Committee members in carrying out their duties; however, the Audit Committee’s
authority to terminate law firms serving as consultants to the Committee is subject to the conservator’s decision.
As described in “Corporate Governance-Audit Committee Membership,” the Board has determined that all members of
Fannie Mae’s Audit Committee are financially literate and all are independent under the independence requirements set
forth in FHFA corporate governance regulations (which require compliance with the independence standards adopted by
the NYSE) and that Mr. Seelig, Dr. Johnson, Ms. Nordin, and Mr. Heid are “audit committee financial experts” under the
rules and regulations of the SEC.
The Audit Committee serves in an oversight capacity. Management is responsible for the financial reporting process,
including the system of internal controls, for the preparation of consolidated financial statements in accordance with
GAAP and for the report on the company’s internal control over financial reporting. The company’s independent auditor,
Deloitte & Touche LLP (“Deloitte”), is responsible for planning and conducting an independent audit of those financial
statements and expressing an opinion as to their conformity with GAAP and expressing an opinion on the effectiveness
of the company’s internal control over financial reporting. The Audit Committee’s responsibility is to oversee the financial
reporting process and to review and discuss management’s report on the company’s internal control over financial
reporting. The Audit Committee relies, without independent verification, on the information provided to it and on the
representations made by management, the internal audit function and the independent auditor, representatives of whom
generally attend each Audit Committee meeting.
For the year ended December 31, 2024 , the Audit Committee, among other things:
• reviewed and discussed the company’s quarterly earnings releases, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and this
Annual Report on Form 10-K, including the consolidated financial statements;
• together with the Board and the other Board Committees, reviewed the company’s major legal and compliance
risk exposures and the guidelines and policies that govern the process for risk assessment and risk
management;
• reviewed and discussed reports from management on the company’s policies regarding applicable legal and
regulatory requirements;
• reviewed and discussed the plan and scope of the 2024 audit work for the independent auditor;
• reviewed and discussed with management the company’ s 2023 Corporate Responsibility & Impact Report ;
• reviewed, discussed and approved the 2024 internal audit plan and budget, and reviewed and discussed
summaries of the significant reports by the internal audit function;
• reviewed the performance and compensation of the Chief Audit Executive and Chief Compliance Officer;
• reviewed the engagement, independence and quality control procedures of the independent auditor, as
described in further detail below;
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance | Report of the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors
• met with and/or received reports from senior representatives of the following divisions or departments of the
company: Finance, Legal, Compliance and Ethics, and Internal Audit; and
• met regularly in executive sessions with each of Deloitte, the internal audit function and company management,
including th e CFO, the C hief Compliance Officer and the Chief Audit Executive, which provided an additional
opportunity for Deloitte and the others noted to provide candid feedback to the Committee.
The Audit Committee also reviewed and discussed with management, the Chief Audit Executive and Deloitte:
• the audited consolidated financial statements for 2024 ;
• the critical accounting estimates that are set forth in this Annual Report on Form 10-K;
• management’s annual report on the company’s internal control over financial reporting; and
• Deloitte’s opinion on the consolidated financial statements, including the critical audit matters addressed during
the audit, and the effectiveness of the company’s internal control over financial reporting.
The Audit Committee has discussed with Deloitte the matters required to be discussed by the applicable requirements
of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”) and the SEC. The Audit Committee has received from
Deloitte the written communications required by applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding Deloitte’s
communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence, and also has discussed with Deloitte its
independence from the company.
In evaluating Deloitte’s independence, the Audit Committee considered whether services it provided to the company
beyond those rendered in connection with its audit of the company’s consolidated financial statements, reviews of the
company’s interim condensed consolidated financial statements included in its quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and its
opinion on the effectiveness of the company’s internal control over financial reporting would impair its independence.
The Committee also reviewed and pre-approved, among other things, the audit, audit-related and non-audit-related
services performed by Deloitte. The Committee received regular updates on the amount of fees and scope of audit,
audit-related and non-audit-related services provided. The Committee concluded that the provision of services by
Deloitte did not impair its independence.
Deloitte has served as the company’s independent auditor since 2005. The Audit Committee selects Deloitte’s lead audit
partner who, along with the engagement quality review partne r, rotates every five years. Pursuant to this schedule, in
2022 the Audit Committee selected a new lead audit partner, who began in the role with the fiscal year 2023 audit. The
Audit Committee evaluates the independent auditor’s qualifications, performance and independence on at least an
annual basis. The factors the Audit Committee considered in evaluating and approving Deloitte’s appointment as the
company’s independent auditor included:
• Deloitte’s technical expertise and industry experience;
• its institutional knowledge of the company’s business, significant accounting practices and system of internal
control over financial reporting;
• audit effectiveness, including the quality of Deloitte’s audit work, its quality control procedures, the expertise
and performance of the lead audit partner, and the professionalism and demonstrated objectivity and
skepticism of Deloitte’s team;
• the frequency and quality of Deloitte’s communication with the Committee, and the level of support provided to
the Committee;
• external data on audit quality and performance and legal and regulatory matters involving Deloitte, including the
results of PCAOB inspection reports and Deloitte’s peer review reports, and actions by Deloitte to continue to
enhance the quality of its audit practice; and
• Deloitte’s independence and its policies and procedures regarding independence.
Based on the reviews, reports, meetings and discussions referred to above, and subject to the limitations on the Audit
Committee’s role and responsibilities described above and in the Audit Committee Charter, the Audit Committee
recommended to the Board of Directors that the company’s audited consolidated financial statements for 2024 be
included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for filing with the SEC. In addition, the Audit Committee approved the
appointment of Fannie Mae’s independent auditor, Deloitte & Touche LLP, for 2025 . FHFA, as the company’s
conservator, approved Deloitte’s appointment as Fannie Mae’s independent auditor for 2025 .
Audit Committee:
Michael A. Seelig, Chair
Simon Johnson, Vice Chair
Diane N. Lye
Diane C. Nordin
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance | Executive Officers
Executive Officers
Under our bylaws, each executive officer holds office until their successor is chosen and qualified or until they die,
resign, retire or are removed from office, whichever occurs first.
Ms. Almodovar, our President and CEO, has served as a member of our Board of Directors since December 2022.
Information about her business experience and other matters is provided in “Directors.” As of February 14, 2025 , we
have seven other executive officers:
Peter Akwaboah
Age 55
Executive Vice President-COO
Joined Fannie Mae in 2024
Mr. Akwaboah has served as Executive Vice President-COO since May 2024. In this capacity, he oversees a portfolio
of enterprise shared services, including the Chief Information Office, Enterprise Security and Resilience, Operations,
and Workplace functions. These functions are core to fostering operational excellence, advancing innovation, and
ensuring alignment with our long-term strategic objectives. Mr. Akwaboah has nearly 30 years of leadership experience
in financial services, transforming operations and technology on a global scale. Before joining Fannie Mae, he served as
Managing Director at Morgan Stanley from 2015 to May 2024, where he ultimately served as COO of Technology and
Head of Innovation and helped shape the firm’s technology strategy. Additionally, from 2017 to 2020, he led Morgan
Stanley’s Global Shared Services and Banking Operations. Mr. Akwaboah also contributed to industry advancements as
a member of the Federal Reserve Bank’s Payments Risk Committee and as a director on the Board of the Morgan
Stanley Foundation. Prior to his tenure at Morgan Stanley, Mr. Akwaboah spent more than a decade at the Royal Bank
of Scotland, where he served as Asia Pacific COO. Earlier in his career, he held leadership roles in operations,
technology, and strategic consulting at Deutsche Bank, KPMG and IBM, where he led cross-functional initiatives and
enterprise-level transformation. Mr. Akwaboah serves on the Boards of the Foundation of Orthopedics and Complex
Spine and the Museum of American Finance.
Malloy Evans
Age 51
Executive Vice President-Single-Family
Joined Fannie Mae in 2004
Mr. Evans has served as Executive Vice President-Single-Family since May 2021. He is responsible for our single-
family business functions, including leading the teams responsible for maintaining our single-family mortgage acquisition
and servicing standards, providing liquidity to the single-family mortgage market, and facilitating access to
homeownership across America. Mr. Evans has served in various leadership roles at Fannie Mae, mo st recently as
Senior Vice President and Chief Credit Officer for Single-Family from 2019 to 2021, where he was responsible for first-
line credit risk management from mortgage acquisition through disposition. He started his Fannie Mae career in 2004 as
an attorney in our legal department, where he advised the business on our multi-class securitization program and later
supported the company’s administration of the Treasury Department’s Making Home Affordable program.
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance | Executive Officers
Michele M. Evans
Age 61
Executive Vice President-Multifamily
Joined Fannie Mae in 1992
Ms. Evans has served as Executive Vice President-Multifamily since August 2020. In this role, she has been
responsible for our multifamily business functions, including leading the teams responsible for maintaining our
multifamily mortgage acquisition and servicing standards, providing liquidity to the multifamily mortgage market, and
facilitating access to quality affordable rental housing across America. Ms. Evans has notified us that she plans to retire
from Fannie Mae in March 2025. Ms. Evans has served in various roles at Fannie Mae, most recently as Senior Vice
President and COO for Multifamily, from 2009 to 2020, where she was responsible for driving the digital transformation
of our Multifamily business; managing loan products; innovating with data; operational risk; and leading Multifamily’s
strategy. After joining Fannie Mae in 1992 as an analyst, Ms. Evans managed DUS and non-DUS lender relationships,
including affordable transactions and credit responsibilities, and held other leadership roles across the Multifamily
business.
Chryssa C. Halley
Age 58
Executive Vice President and CFO
Joined Fannie Mae in 2006
Ms. Halley has served as Executive Vice President and CFO since November 2021. In this role, she is responsible for
our financial management as well as modeling, climate-related risk management, and corporate strategy. Previously,
Ms. Halley served as Fannie Mae’s Senior Vice President and Controller, from 2017 to 2021. Since joining Fannie Mae
in 2006, she has held a variety of positions, including Senior Vice President and Deputy Controller; Vice President and
Assistant Controller for Capital Markets and Operations; Vice President for Tax, Debt and Derivatives, and Securities
Accounting; and Vice President for Corporate Tax.
Danielle M. McCoy
Age 48
Senior Vice President, General Counsel, and
Corporate Secretary
Joined Fannie Mae in 2006
Ms. McCoy has served as Senior Vice President, General Counsel, and Corporate Secretary since January 2024. Ms.
McCoy served as Senior Vice President, Enterprise Deputy General Counsel and Deputy Corporate Secretary from
2021 to 2023, overseeing four areas within the legal department: corporate governance, fair lending, corporate data and
technology, and data privacy and cybersecurity. Before assuming this position, from 2015 to 2021, she served as
Fannie Mae’s Fair Lending Officer in her role as Vice President and Deputy General Counsel of Fair Lending and was
responsible for fair lending compliance, legal analysis, and analytics activities. Prior to that role, Ms. McCoy served as
Deputy General Counsel for Corporate Governance, providing legal advice to senior management and the Fannie Mae
Board of Directors. Ms. McCoy joined Fannie Mae in 2006.
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance | Executive Officers
Anthony Moon
Age 60
Executive Vice President and CRO
Joined Fannie Mae in 2022
Mr. Moon has served as Fannie Mae’s Executive Vice President and CRO since December 2022. In this role, he is
responsible for our Corporate Risk & Compliance division , which oversees the company’s governance and strategy for
global risk management, including establishing our overarching risk governance framework as well as risk appetite. Mr.
Moon has over 30 years of experience in financial services and over 25 years of experience in risk management. Mr.
Moon previously served as CRO for Wealth Management and the Morgan Stanley Private Bank at Morgan Stanley, from
2015 to December 2022. In that role, he was responsible for risk management oversight for market, credit, operational,
liquidity, model, and strategic risks. He previously held risk leadership positions at GE Capital, Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi,
and Bankers Trust. Mr. Moon also serves as a Board Member for the Cortland College Foundation.
Stergios “Terry” Theologides
Age 58
Executive Vice President and Chief Administrative
Officer
Joined Fannie Mae in 2019
Mr. Theologides has served as Executive Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer since January 2024. In this
role, he is responsible for leading our Legal, Communications, Government and Industry Relations, Marketing,
Economic and Strategic Research, and Mission & Impact groups. F rom 2019 to 2023, Mr. Theologides served as
Fannie Mae’s Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary. Prior to joining Fannie Mae, from
2017 to 2019, Mr. Theologides was in private legal practice at Theologides Law, P.C. He served as Senior Vice
President, General Counsel and Secretary of CoreLogic, Inc. from 2010 to 2017, and served as Senior Vice President
and General Counsel, Information Solutions Group, of The First American Corporation, CoreLogic’s predecessor, from
2009 to 2010. Mr. Theologides was Executive Vice President and General Counsel for Morgan Stanley’s U.S. residential
mortgage businesses from 2007 to 2009. He was Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary for New
Century Financial Corporation from 1998 to 2007. Mr. Theologides was in private legal practice at O’Melveny & Myers
LLP from 1992 to 1996.
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
Executive Compensation | Compensation Discussion and Analysis

---

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Item 11. Executive Compensation
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
Named Executives for 2024
This Compensation Discussion and Analysis focuses on our compensation decisions and arrangements for 2024
relating to the following executive officers, whom we refer to as our “named executives”:
• Priscilla Almodovar President and CEO
• Chryssa C. Halley Executive Vice President and CFO
• Peter A. Akwaboah Executive Vice President and COO
• Malloy Evans Executive Vice President-Single-Family
• Anthony Moon Executive Vice President and CRO
Executive Summary
Due to our conservatorship status and other legal requirements, FHFA, our conservator and regulator, has substantial
oversight and approval rights over our executive compensation arrangements and determinations. While conserving
taxpayer resources is an important objective of FHFA’s design of our executive compensation program, we and FHFA
understand that this objective must be balanced with our need to attract and retain qualified and experienced
executives. In addition to FHFA’s oversight, Congress has also enacted legislation that significantly impacts the
compensation we pay our named executives, as we describe in “Restrictions on Executive Compensation.”
Compensation for our President and CEO is limited by statute while we are in conservatorship or receivership. Our 2024
compensation arrangements with our other named executives, which we refer to as the “ 2024 executive compensation
program,” were developed by FHFA in consultation with Treasury. Named executives other than our President and CEO
receive two principal elements of compensation: base salary, which is paid throughout the year, and deferred salary,
which is paid after a deferral period. There are two components to deferred salary: (1) a fixed portion that is generally
subject to reduction if an executive leaves the company within one year following the end of the performance year,
unless they have met specified age and years of service requirements; and (2) an at-risk portion that is subject to
reduction based on corporate and individual performance. Named executives do not receive bonuses or any form of
equity compensation.
Under the leadership of our executives, including our named executives, in 2024 we provided $381 billion in liquidity to
the market , earned $17.0 billion in net in come, increased our net worth as of December 31, 2024 to $94.7 billion , and
managed our $4.1 trillion guaranty b ook of business. Our 2024 goals included a set of corporate performance goals for
2024 set by FHFA as our conservator, which we refer to as the 2024 scorecard, and a set of goals established by our
Board of Directors, which we refer to as the 2024 Board of Directors’ goals. We discuss our performance against these
goals in “Assessment of Corporate Performance against 2024 Scorecard” and “Assessment of Corporate Performance
against 2024 Board of Directors’ Goals.”
Overview of 2024 Executive Compensation Program
FHFA has advised us that the design of our executive compensation program is intended to fulfill and balance three
primary objectives:
• Maintain Lower Pay Levels to Conserve Taxpayer Resources. Given our conservatorship status, our executive
compensation program is designed generally to provide for lower pay levels relative to large financial services
companies that are not in conservatorship.
• Attract and Retain Executive Talent. Our executive compensation program is intended to attract and retain
executive talent with the specialized skills and knowledge necessary to effectively manage a large financial
services company. Executives with these qualifications are needed for us to continue to fulfill our important role
in providing liquidity to the mortgage market and supporting the housing market, as well as to prudently
manage our guaranty book of business. We face competition for qualified executives from other companies.
The Compensation and Human Capital Committee regularly considers the level of our executives’
compensation and whether changes are needed to attract and retain executives.
• Reduce Pay if Goals Are Not Achieved. To support FHFA’s goals for our conservatorship and encourage
performance in furtherance of these goals, 30% of an executive’s total target direct compensation consists of
at-risk deferred salary subject to reduction based on corporate and individual performance.
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
Executive Compensation | Compensation Discussion and Analysis
FHFA’s objectives for our executive compensation program and the restrictions on our executive compensation
described below limit our ability to make changes to the program and limit the amount and type of compensation we
may pay our executives.
Restrictions on Executive Compensation
Our executive compensation program and policies are significantly affected by requirements that apply to us as a result
of conservatorship and as a result of requirements in applicable legislation and in our senior preferred stock purchase
agreement with Treasury.
Requirements Applicable During Conservatorship
While we are in conservatorship, we are subject to additional legal, regulatory and conservator requirements relating to
our executive compensation, including the following:
• Equity in Government Compensation Act. The Equity in Government Compensation Act of 2015 limits the
compensation and benefits for our CEO role to the same level in effect as of January 1, 2015 while we are in
conservatorship or receivership. This law also provides that compensation and benefits for our CEO role may
not be increased while we are in conservatorship or receivership. Accordingly, annual direct compensation for
our CEO role is limited to base salary at an annual rate of $600,000.
• The Stop Trading on Congressional Knowledge Act of 2012, known as the STOCK Act. Pursuant to the STOCK
Act and related FHFA regulations, our senior executives, including the named executives, are prohibited from
receiving bonuses during conservatorship. FHFA defines a bonus as a payment that rewards an employee for
work performed, where details of the award (such as the decision to grant it or its amounts) are determined
after the performance period using discretion or inherently subjective measures.
• FHFA authority to set executive compensation. The powers of FHFA as our conservator include the authority to
set executive compensation. As our conservator, FHFA has retained the authority to approve the terms and
amounts of our executive compensation. In its instructions to us, FHFA has directed management to obtain
FHFA’s decision before entering into new compensation arrangements or increasing amounts or benefits
payable under existing compensation arrangements of named executives or other executive officers as defined
in SEC rules.
• FHFA requirements for employee compensation . Pursuant to FHFA instructions, FHFA’s decision as
conservator is required with regard to any changes in employee compensation that could significantly impact
our employees, including but not limited to special incentive plans, merit increase pool funding, and retention
awards for executives.
• Key FHFA compensation directives . As our conservator, from time to time, FHFA issues or updates directives
that relate to compensation of our executives and other employees. Currently applicable FHFA directives
provide as follows:
◦ Base salaries for all executives are limited to no more than $600,000.
◦ Our policies and procedures must include penalties for executive officers and certain other covered
employees who are found to have engaged in specified restricted activity, including the clawback of
compensation in appropriate circumstances to the extent permitted by law.
◦ We may target between the 25th and 50th percentiles of appropriate market data for both new
executive hires and compensation increase requests for existing executives, unless FHFA has granted
an exception.
◦ As directed by FHFA, we implemented a new peer group and benchmarking approach for executive
compensation beginning with 2024 compensation, and we are required to apply a 20% discount to the
benchmarking data for the roles of CFO, COO and President.
• Stockholder Powers. As our conservator, FHFA has all powers of our stockholders. Accordingly, we have not
held stockholders’ meetings since entering into conservatorship, nor have we held any stockholder advisory
votes on executive compensation.
• Golden Parachute Regulation. A golden parachute payment generally refers to a compensatory payment that is
contingent on or provided in connection with termination of employment. FHFA regulation pursuant to the GSE
Act generally prohibits us from making golden parachute payments to any current or former director, officer, or
employee during any period in which we are in conservatorship, receivership or other troubled condition, unless
either a specific exemption applies or the Director of FHFA approves the payments. Specific exemptions
include qualified pension or retirement plans, nondiscriminatory employee plans or programs that meet
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
Executive Compensation | Compensation Discussion and Analysis
specified requirements, and bona fide deferred compensation plans or arrangements that meet specified
requirements.
Other Applicable Requirements
We are also subject to legal and regulatory requirements relating to our executive compensation that apply whether or
not we are in conservatorship, including the following:
• Senior Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement. Under the terms of our senior preferred stock purchase
agreement with Treasury, until the senior preferred stock is repaid or redeemed in full:
◦ We may not enter into any new compensation arrangements with, or increase amounts or benefits
payable under existing compensation arrangements of, any named executives or other executive
officers as defined in SEC rules without the consent of the Director of FHFA, in consultation with the
Secretary of the Treasury.
◦ We may not sell or issue any equity securities without the prior written consent of Treasury except
under limited circumstances, which effectively eliminates our ability to offer stock-based compensation.
• Charter Act. Under the Charter Act and related FHFA regulations, FHFA as our regulator must approve any
termination benefits we offer to our named executives and certain other officers identified by FHFA.
• GSE Act. Pursuant to the GSE Act and related FHFA regulations, FHFA as our regulator has specified oversight
authority over our executive compensation. The GSE Act directs FHFA to prohibit us from providing
compensation to our named executives and certain other officers identified by FHFA that is not reasonable or
comparable with compensation for employment in other similar businesses (including other publicly held
financial institutions or major financial services companies) involving similar duties and responsibilities. FHFA
may at any time review the reasonableness and comparability of an executive officer’s compensation and may
require us to withhold any payment to the officer during such review. The GSE Act also provides that, if we are
classified as significantly undercapitalized, FHFA’s prior written approval is required to pay any bonus to an
executive officer or to provide certain increases in compensation to an executive officer.
President and CEO Compensation
Direct compensation for our President and CEO consists solely of a base salary at an annual rate of $600,000 and has
been limited to this amount for our CEO role by statute since the enactment of the Equity in Government Compensation
Act of 2015. For purposes of this disclosure, “direct compensation” includes salary and other cash compensation, but
excludes health and welfare, retirement, relocation , secure transportation, and other benefits. Ms. Almodovar, who
serves as President and CEO, does not receive any additional compensation for serving as President. See
“Compensation Tables and Other Information-Summary Compensation Table” for information about our President and
CEO’s total 2024 compensation.
Total direct compensation for our President and CEO is significantly below the market median for 2023 CEO
compensation at comparable businesses. See “Risk Factors- GSE and Conservatorship Risk ” for a discussion of the
risks associated with executive retention and succession planning.
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
Executive Compensation | Compensation Discussion and Analysis
Elements of 2024 Executive Compensation
Direct Compensation
The table below summarizes the principal elements, objectives and key features of our 2024 executive compensation
program for our named executives other than our President and CEO, who receives no deferred salary. All elements of
our named executives’ direct compensation are paid in cash.
Compensation
Element
Form
Primary
Compensation
Objectives
Key Features
Base Salary
Fixed cash payments,
which are paid during the
year on a biweekly basis.
Attract and
retain named
executives by
providing a
fixed level of
current cash
compensation.
Base salary reflects each named executive’s level
of responsibility and experience, as well as
individual performance over time.
Base salary rate may not exceed $600,000 for any
executive while we are in conservatorship.
Deferred
Salary
Deferred salary is earned in
biweekly increments over
the course of the
performance year and is
subject to reduction in
certain circumstances.
There are two elements of
deferred salary:
• a fixed portion; and
• an at-risk portion.
Deferred salary is paid, with
interest, in quarterly
installments in the year after
it is earned for fixed
deferred salary and in the
second year for at-risk
deferred salary.
Fixed Deferred Salary
Retain named
executives.
Earned but unpaid fixed deferred salary is generally
subject to reduction if a named executive leaves
Fannie Mae within one year following the end of the
performance year, unless they have met specified
age and years of service requirements or in the
case of death or long-term disability, as described
in “Compensation Tables and Other Information-
Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change-
in-Control.”
The amount of earned but unpaid fixed deferred
salary received by the named executive will be
reduced by 2% for each full or partial month by
which the executive’s separation date precedes
January 31 of the second year following the
performance year (or, if later, the end of the twenty-
fourth month following the month in which the
named executive first earned deferred salary).
At-Risk Deferred Salary
Retain named
executives and
encourage
them to achieve
corporate and
individual
performance
objectives.
Equal to 30% of each named executive’s total
target direct compensation. Half of at-risk deferred
salary was subject to reduction based on corporate
performance against the 2024 scorecard. The
remaining half of at-risk deferred salary was subject
to reduction based on individual performance,
taking into account corporate performance against
the 2024 Board of Directors’ goals.
There is no potential for at-risk deferred salary to
be paid out at greater than 100% of target.
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
Executive Compensation | Compensation Discussion and Analysis
Employee Benefits
Our employee benefits serve as an important tool in attracting and retaining senior executives. We describe the
employee benefits available in 2024 to our named executives, including our President and CEO, in the table below. We
provide more detail on our retirement plans in “Compensation Tables and Other Information.”
Benefit
Form
Primary Objective
401(k) Plan (“Retirement
Savings Plan”)
The Retirement Savings Plan is a tax-qualified
defined contribution plan (“401(k) plan”) available to
our employee population as a whole.
Attract and retain named
executives by providing
retirement savings in a
tax-efficient manner.
Non-qualified Deferred
Compensation (“Supplemental
Retirement Savings Plan”)
The Supplemental Retirement Savings Plan is an
unfunded, non-tax-qualified defined contribution
plan. The plan supplements our Retirement Savings
Plan by providing benefits to participants whose
annual eligible earnings exceed the IRS limit on
eligible compensation for 401(k) plans.
Attract and retain named
executives by providing
additional retirement
savings.
Health, Welfare and Other
Benefits
In general, the named executives are eligible for the
same benefits available to our employee population
as a whole, including our medical insurance plans
and life insurance program. The named executives
are also eligible to participate in our voluntary
supplemental long-term disability plan, which is
available to many of our employees.
Provide for the well-being
of the named executives
and their families.
Sign-on Awards and Relocation Benefits
In addition to the direct compensation and employee benefits described above, we sometimes offer sign-on awards and
relocation benefits to attract new executives to Fannie Mae. Our sign-on awards are designed to compensate new
executives for compensation forfeited upon leaving their prior employer. We offer relocation benefits to attract new
executives who do not already live in the Washington, DC area.
Mr. Akwaboah, who joined Fannie Mae in May 2024, received a sign-on award payable in two installments. The amount
of his sign-on award was initially set at $1,750,000 but was subsequently increased to $2,427,000 to more accurately
reflect the amount of incentive compensation Mr. Akwaboah forfeited to join Fannie Mae. Mr. Akwaboah received a first
installment pursuant to this award, in the amount of $1,250,000 , in May 2024. He is scheduled to receive a second and
final installment of $1,177, 000 in May 20 2 5, subject to his continued employment through such date. Mr. Moon received
a sign-on award of $2,100,000 when he joined Fannie Mae in December 2022, payable in three installments. Mr. Moon
received the first two installments of this award in 2023 and the final installment, in the amount of $525,000, in
December 2024. E ach installment of these sign-on awards is subject to repayment if, within one year after its payment,
the recipient resigns or his employment with Fannie Mae is terminated involuntarily due to his misconduct.
Mr. Akwaboah was also offered benefits upon joining Fannie Mae under our relocation plan, conditioned on his
continued employment with us for a minimum of 18 months. He must reimburse us 100% of these benefits if his
employment terminates (either voluntarily or involuntarily due to misconduct) within 12 months of his May 2024 start
date, or 50% if his employment terminates from the 13th through the 18th month.
Secure Transportation Services
For her safety, we provide Ms. Almodovar with the services of a car and executive protection driver for local commuting
and related travel pursuant to the recommendation of a third-party security study.
Severance Benefits
We have not entered into agreements with any of our named executives that entitle the executive to severance benefits.
See “Compensation Tables and Other Information-Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change-in-Control” for
information on earned but unpaid deferred salary (and related interest) that we may pay to a named executive in certain
circumstances following termination of employment.
2024 Compensation Actions
The table below displays the 2024 direct compensation targets for each of our named executives compared to the
actual amounts that will be paid to them based on the assessments and determinations made by FHFA, the
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
Executive Compensation | Compensation Discussion and Analysis
Compensation and Human Capital Committee, and the Board of Directors. This table is presented on a different basis
from, and is not intended to replace, the Summary Compensation Table required under applicable SEC rules, which is
included in “Compensation Tables and Other Information-Summary Compensation Table” and includes additional
forms of compensation not included in the table below.
Summary of 2024 Compensation Actions
2024 Corporate
Performance-Based
At-Risk Deferred
Salary
2024 Individual
Performance-Based
At-Risk Deferred
Salary
Total
Name and Principal Position
2024 Base
Salary
2024 Fixed
Deferred
Salary
Target
Actual
% of
Target
Target
Actual
% of
Target
Target
Actual
Priscilla Almodovar
$ 600,000
$ -
$ -
- %
$ -
- %
$ 600,000
$ 600,000
President and CEO
Chryssa Halley (1)
600,000
1,722,115
497,596
497,596
3,317,307
3,237,691
Executive Vice President and CFO
Peter Akwaboah (2)
369,231
1,246,154
346,154
346,154
2,307,693
2,252,308
Executive Vice President and COO
Malloy Evans (1)
600,000
1,648,077
481,731
481,731
3,211,539
3,134,462
Executive Vice President-Single
Family
Anthony Moon (1)(2)
564,615
1,460,000
433,846
433,846
2,892,307
2,822,892
Executive Vice President and CRO
(1) Compensation amounts shown reflect compensation levels before and after increases during 2024 for Ms. Halley, Mr.
Evans and Mr. Moon, prorated as appropriate. The increases were approved by the Board of Directors and FHFA to better
align Ms. Halley’s and Mr. Evans’s compensation with the market and to reflect role changes and new responsibilities for
Mr. Moon. Ms. Halley’s total annual direct compensation target increased to $3,750,000, consisting of base salary of
$600,000, fixed deferred salary of $2,025,000 and at-risk deferred salary of $1,125,000; Mr. Evans’ total annual direct
compensation target increased to $3,500,000, consisting of base salary of $600,000, fixed deferred salary of $1,850,000
and at-risk deferred salary of $1,050,000. Mr. Moon’s total annual direct compensation target increased to $2,900,000,
consisting of base salary of $570,000, fixed deferred salary of $1,460,000 and at-risk deferred salary of $870,000.
(2) This table excludes the sign-on award amounts Mr. Akwaboah and Mr. Moon received in 2024 , which are discus sed in
“Elements of 2024 Executive Compensation-Sign-on Awards and Relocation Benefits.”
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
Executive Compensation | Compensation Discussion and Analysis
Assessment of Corporate Performance against 2024 Scorecard
Overview
In January 2024 , FHFA issued the 2024 scorecard, a set of corporate performance objectives and related targets for
2024 . Half of 2024 at-risk deferred salary, or 15% of overall 2024 total target direct compensation, for each named
executive other than Ms. Almodovar was subject to reduction based on FHFA’s assessment in its discretion of our
performance against the 2024 scorecard and related objectives.
The elements of the 2024 scorecard are shown below under “FHFA Assessment.” FHFA developed these objectives and
related targets with input from management. The 2024 scorecard established that our performance would be assessed
based on the following criteria:
• Our products and programs foster liquid, competitive, efficient, and resilient housing finance markets that
support affordable, sustainable, and equitable access to homeownership and rental housing.
• We conduct business in a safe and sound manner.
• We meet expectations under all FHFA requirements, including those pertaining to capital, liquidity, and credit
risk transfer.
• We continue to manage operations while in conservatorship in a manner that preserves and conserves assets
through the prudent stewardship of resources.
• We cooperate and collaborate with FHFA to meet the conservator’s priorities and guidance throughout the
course of the year in alignment with FHFA’s FAIR values (Fairness, Accountability, Integrity, and Respect).
• We deliver work products that are high quality, thorough, creative, effective, and timely, and that consider
effects on homeowners, multifamily property owners, renters, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the industry, and
other stakeholders.
• We ensure that diversity, equity, and inclusion remain top priorities in strategic planning, operations, and
business development.
FHFA Assessment
We provided updates to and maintained a dialogue with FHFA throughout 2024 on our performance against the 2024
scorecard. In January 2025 , FHFA reviewed and assessed our performance against the 2024 scorecard, with input from
management. In its assessment of our performance, the factors FHFA considered included our performance against the
qualitative assessment criteria identified above as well as the 2024 scorecard and related objectives. FHFA determined
that we completed all our objectives, while noting concerns with our performance in meeting a few of them. FHFA
determined that the portion of 2024 at-risk deferred salary for senior executives that is based on corporate performance
would be paid at 89% of target.
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
Executive Compensation | Compensation Discussion and Analysis
The table below sets forth the 2024 scorecard. For purposes of the 2024 scorecard, “Enterprise” refers to each of
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.
FHFA 2024 Scorecard
Promote Equitable Access to Affordable and Sustainable Housing (50%)
Conduct business and undertake initiatives that support affordable, sustainable, and equitable access to
homeownership and rental housing, and fulfill all statutory mandates.
Take significant actions to ensure that all borrowers and renters have equitable access to sustainable long-
term affordable housing opportunities, including efforts that further energy efficiency, resiliency, and cost
savings in the mortgage process, considering the impact on all geographies, including rural areas as
defined under Duty to Serve. Develop and implement strategies to support and advance the following :
• Sustainable and affordable homeownership
◦ Explore the evolving single-family property insurance market, identifying opportunities to mitigate risk while
furthering sustainable homeownership.
◦ Continue efforts to expand energy efficiency and resiliency that improve long-term sustainable
homeownership.
◦ Explore opportunities to further sustainable homeownership through measures that support first-time and
mission-oriented homebuyers, and positively influence affordability, including transaction costs, in a manner
that maintains safety and soundness.
• Multifamily rental housing
◦ Enhance resident-centered practices, such as tenant protections, at Enterprise-backed multifamily
properties.
◦ Strengthen multifamily asset management capabilities, including identifying and managing legal risk
appropriately.
◦ Explore and identify innovative ways to address multifamily market needs.
◦ Manage new multifamily purchases to remain within the multifamily cap requirements, including an
expanded focus on workforce/moderate-income housing.
• Equitable access to housing
◦ Take meaningful actions to achieve the goals and objectives of the Equitable Housing Finance Plans.
◦ Continue efforts to minimize single-family appraisal bias and improve valuation equity, including by
supporting FHFA’s implementation of the Property and Valuation Equity (PAVE) action plan.
• Efficiency in the mortgage market
◦ Continue modernization of single-family property valuation processes and practices, including traditional
appraisals and valuation alternatives.
◦ Leverage data, technology, and other innovations to promote efficiency and cost savings in mortgage
processes.
◦ Plan for implementation of the approved credit score models, informed by stakeholder outreach.
• Climate risks
◦ Identify and pursue measures to enhance consumer awareness of climate risks in housing.
◦ Continue research to monitor climate-related market developments; identify at-risk borrowers, properties,
and communities; inform policy; and improve climate-resiliency and energy efficiency efforts.
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
Executive Compensation | Compensation Discussion and Analysis
Operate the Business in a Safe and Sound Manner (50%)
Operate with heightened focus on safety and soundness and with a prudent risk profile consistent with continued
support for housing finance markets throughout the economic cycle, while minimizing the risk of requiring a draw
against the Treasury commitment.
Ensure that the Enterprise is resilient to operational, market, credit, counterparty, economic, legal/litigation,
and climate risks.
• Maintain effective risk management systems appropriate for entities that need to minimize risk to capital as
they rebuild their capital buffers.
• Take appropriate action to address risk exposure and enhance Enterprise counterparty risk controls.
• Strengthen risk management capabilities in identifying, assessing, controlling, monitoring, and reporting on
climate risk and incorporating these capabilities into the overall Enterprise risk framework.
• Maintain ability to respond to operational events without significant disruption to the primary or secondary
mortgage market.
• Maintain liquidity at levels required by FHFA and sufficient to sustain Enterprise operations through severe
stress events.
• Explore opportunities to harmonize the Enterprises’ processes supporting the Single-Family Selling
Representations and Warranties Framework, including defect identification, remedies, and repurchase
alternatives.
Transfer a meaningful amount of credit risk to private investors in a commercially reasonable and safe and
sound manner, reducing risk to taxpayers.
Ensure CSS operates in a safe and sound manner in support of Enterprise securitization activities.
(Measures with respect to this objective applied only to CSS, not Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.)
Assessment of Corporate Performance against 2024 Board of Directors’ Goals
In January 2024 , the Board of Directors established the 2024 Board of Directors’ goals, which are presented in the table
below. Performance against these goals was a factor the Board of Directors used in determining the individual
performance-based component of 2024 at-risk deferred salary.
The Compensation and Human Capital Committee and the full Board of Directors reviewed our performance in
December 2024 . In connection with the review, the Committee considered a report management provided that assessed
the company’s performance against the Board of Directors’ goals. Information in this assessment was reviewed for
reasonableness by our Internal Audit group. The Compensation and Human Capital Committee discussed Fannie Mae’s
2024 performance with the full Board, including the Chairs of the Audit Committee and the Risk Policy and Capital
Committee. The Board of Directors and the Compensation and Human Capital Committee did not assign any relative
weight to the Board of Directors’ goals and used their judgment in determining the overall level of company
performance.
The Compensation and Human Capital Committee commended management on a number of accomplishments in
2024, including providing liquidity to the mortgage market, addressing climate-related risk, excelling against the
workforce Board of Directors’ goal, advancing a number of technology-related objectives, increasing our net worth,
reducing our capital shortfall, and implementing a new budgeting model. The Compensation and Human Capital
Committee also acknowledged concerns with the manner in which management initially responded to issues that arose
during the year. Taking a holistic view of our 2024 performance, in December 2024 the Compensation and Human
Capital Committee recommended, and the Board of Directors determined, that management should be credited with
95% achievement of corporate performance against the Board of Directors’ goals.
In December 2024, the Compensation and Human Capital Committee provided FHFA with its assessment of corporate
performance against the 2024 Board of Directors’ goals. In January 2025 , the Chair of the Board of Directors reviewed
an updated performance report provided by management with information available as of year-end and determined that
there was no material change in the updated information requiring reconsideration of the Board’s determination.
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
Executive Compensation | Compensation Discussion and Analysis
The table below sets forth our 2024 Board of Directors’ goals and a summary of our achievement against these goals.
Board of Directors’ Goals
Goals
Performance
Goals Relating to Strategic Objectives
Improve Equitable &
Sustainable Access to
Housing
Take action to ensure that
borrowers and renters
have equitable access to
long-term affordable
housing opportunities.
The goal was assessed as achieved.
We believe Fannie Mae met or exceeded its multifamily
housing goals, its duty to serve targets, and the benchmark
levels for all but two of its single-family housing goals.
Those two single-family housing goals may also be met
based on the level of goals-eligible originations in the
primary mortgage market in 2024, which will not be
available until later this year. FHFA will make the final
determination on whether the company has met its 2024
housing goals and duty to serve targets.
Take targeted actions to
address climate-related
risks to Fannie Mae while
also guiding efforts to
support sustainable
housing.
The goal was assessed as achieved.
Fannie Mae researched and worked on developing climate
risk measurements, further incorporated climate risks into
its risk management framework, continued climate risk
reporting, education, and awareness, and engaged with
industry stakeholders to address environmental resiliency.
Enhance our Financial &
Risk Position
Manage our business, risk,
and financial position to
ensure safety and
soundness and enable
pursuit of our mission-first
approach to business.
The goal was assessed as partially achieved.
Fannie Mae adhered to Board-approved risk limits and
managed administrative expenses within Board-approved
limits. The Compensation and Human Capital Committee
noted concerns with the manner in which management
initially responded to certain issues that arose in connection
with other objectives.
Goals Relating to Other Objectives
Evolve our Technology
Support delivery of our
business objectives to
benefit borrowers and
renters and expand
adoption of our
modernized technology,
data, and cybersecurity
capabilities to increase our
operational agility, stability
and efficiency.
The goal was assessed as achieved.
Fannie Mae made progress in migrating on-premise
technology assets to the cloud and made technological
advancements that are expected to result in cost savings,
streamlined lender processes, and increased efficiency.
Strengthen our Workforce
Develop and maintain our
workforce to ensure
continuity of operations,
support our strategy, and
continue to enhance our
culture.
The goal was assessed as achieved.
Fannie Mae successfully navigated several significant
senior leadership changes in 2024, spotlighting the
effectiveness of its succession planning. Fannie Mae also
maintained strong employee engagement and low attrition
rates.
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
Executive Compensation | Compensation Discussion and Analysis
Board of Directors’ Goals, continued
Goals
Performance
Promote Diversity &
Inclusion
Promote diversity and the
inclusion and utilization of
minorities, women and
individuals with disabilities
in all aspects of our
business.
The goal was assessed as achieved.
Fannie Mae met its 2024 diversity and inclusion goals
consistent with the principles of equal opportunity in
employment and contracting.
Deliver our Regulatory
Commitments
Ensure we are meeting
commitments to FHFA.
The goal was assessed as achieved.
Fannie Mae completed the objectives in the 2024
scorecard and timely submitted requested documents and
remediation plans to FHFA for all FHFA-identified risk and
control matters within established timeframes or mutually
acceptable extensions.
Assessment of 2024 Individual Performance
For each named executive eligible to receive at-risk deferred salary, half of 2024 at-risk deferred salary was subject to
reduction based on individual performance, taking into account corporate performance against the 2024 Board of
Directors’ goals, as determined by the Board of Directors with FHFA’s approval. Although Ms. Almodovar is not eligible
to receive at-risk deferred salary, the Board of Directors also reviewed Ms. Almodovar’s performance.
The Board’s determinations regarding individual performance were based on the recommendation of the Compensation
and Human Capital Committee. For Mr. Moon, our CRO, the Compensation and Human Capital Committee’s
recommendation was made in consultation with the Risk Policy and Capital Committee. These committees met in
December to assess the 2024 performance of our named executives. The committees also discussed the individual
performance of our other named executives with Ms. Almodovar. Upon recommendation from the committees, the
Board of Directors determined performance and approved individual performance-based at-risk deferred salary for 2024
as shown above in “2024 Compensation Actions.” FHFA approved the performance-based at-risk deferred salary
payments for the eligible named executives in January 2025 .
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
Executive Compensation | Compensation Discussion and Analysis
In addition to the company’s performance against the 2024 Board of Directors’ goals, the Compensation and Human
Capital Committee reviewed the following individual contributions of our named executives.
Chryssa Halley
Executive Vice
President and CFO
• Developed and implemented a new budgeting model to improve prioritization of work
and capacity by increasing transparency and visibility into how funds are allocated and
used
• Made progress on major corporate initiatives relating to model remediation and forecast
transformation
• Created and socialized a new return metric to support future decision-making on single-
family pricing
• Improved Board reporting on liquidity, capital and return information to enhance
awareness and understanding
• Oversaw work supporting multiple system releases, preparation for climate reporting,
and resolution planning, including development of a new machine learning tool
• Met business needs and developed talent at senior levels in the Finance division
through several key leadership changes
Peter Akwaboah
Executive Vice
President and COO
• Conducted an assessment of the COO organization through benchmarking and
stakeholder interviews to create comprehensive strategy across three core dimensions:
commercial orientation and innovation, risk and resilience, and effectiveness
• Supported new budgeting model
• Redefined the leadership structure of the COO organization to position our technology
and operational capabilities for the future
• Made progress in migrating assets to cloud-based systems
Malloy Evans
Executive Vice
President-Single-
Family
• Managed competing single-family business objectives through a volatile
macroeconomic environment and challenging competitive dynamics
• Supported the development and approval of updates to DU that reflect our ongoing
commitment to managing mortgage credit risk and being a reliable source of mortgage
financing for the U.S. housing system
• Oversaw the transition to our cloud-based underwriting platform
• Oversaw continued innovation to support responsible access to credit for credit-invisible
and underserved borrowers
• Supported development and execution of new structures for credit risk transfers that
improved capital efficiency in both CAS and CIRT deals
• Worked closely with the Finance organization to begin using new budgeting model
Anthony Moon
Executive Vice
President and CRO
• Provided leadership in addressing FHFA concerns with multifamily risk management
• Executed reviews of Fannie Mae functions to enable increased focus on high priority
areas
• Co-led efforts with the CFO to make progress on model remediation
• Launched a new single-family mortgage industry CRO roundtable, establishing
foundational relationships and opportunities for sharing best practices and learning
Other Executive Compensation Considerations
Role of Compensation Consultants
The Compensation and Human Capital Committee’s independent compensation consultant is Frederic W. Cook & Co.,
Inc. (“FW Cook”). Management’s outside compensation consultant is McLagan, a business unit of Aon plc.
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
Executive Compensation | Compensation Discussion and Analysis
For 2024 , consultants from FW Cook attended meetings and advised the Compensation and Human Capital Committee
and the Board of Directors on various executive compensation matters, including:
• preparing analyses of compensation for our President and CEO, CFO, and COO positions in comparison to
comparable positions at companies in our peer group approved by FHFA in 2023, based on information in
proxy statements and other reports filed by those companies with the SEC;
• reviewing McLagan’s analysis of market compensation data for select senior management positions;
• reviewing various management proposals relating to compensation levels, and for new hires and promotions;
• reviewing our risk assessment of our 2024 compensation program;
• assisting the Compensation and Human Capital Committee in its evaluation of our performance against the
2024 Board of Directors’ goals;
• facilitating the Compensation and Human Capital Committee’s review of our President and CEO’s performance;
• informing the Compensation and Human Capital Committee of regulatory updates and market trends in
compensation and benefits; and
• assisting with the preparation of executive compensation disclosure in our Annual Report on Form 10-K.
For 2024 , consultants from McLagan attended meetings as needed and advised management and the Compensation
and Human Capital Committee on various compensation and human resources matters, including:
• providing guidance and feedback on our 2024 executive compensation program;
• providing market compensation data for senior management positions leveraging the peer group approved by
FHFA in 2023;
• providing supplemental benchmark information to support Fannie Mae in meeting FHFA directions for
compensation actions;
• defining the protocol regarding benchmarking for executives;
• advising on market trends, competitive pay levels and various compensation proposals for new hires and
promotions; and
• reviewing market data and trends, and providing Compensation and Human Capital Committee members with
an opportunity to ask questions and discuss implications of trends on Fannie Mae.
Compensation Consultant Independence Assessment
Pursuant to SEC and NYSE rules, the Compensation and Human Capital Committee assessed the independence of
FW Cook and McLagan most recently in December 2024 . Based on its assessments, the Compensation and Human
Capital Committee determined that FW Cook is independent from Fannie Mae management and has no conflicts of
interest.
Because McLagan was retained by and provides services to management, it is not an independent advisor. McLagan’s
work raises no material conflicts of interest, and we believe any conflict of interest raised by McLagan’s retention and
provision of services to management as well as to the Compensation and Human Capital Committee is addressed by
the Compensation and Human Capital Committee’s receipt of advice from and access to FW Cook as its independent
compensation consultant.
Peer Group and Role of Benchmark Data
Our Compensation and Human Capital Committee considers benchmark data to assess the comparability of our senior
executives’ compensation. This data is one of a number of factors that informs the Committee’s compensation
decisions.
Finding comparable companies for benchmarking executive compensation is challenging due to our unique business,
structure and mission, and the large size of our book of business compared to other financial services companies. We
believe the only directly comparable company to us is Freddie Mac. At FHFA’s request, we and Freddie Mac use the
same peer group to provide consistency in the market data used for compensation decisions. In 2023, FHFA developed
and approved a revised peer group and benchmarking approach for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. The Compensation
and Human Capital Committee also approved the revised peer group and approach, which first applied to compensation
in 2024.
Under the revised approach, we benchmark against compensation for roles involving similar duties and responsibilities
at companies in a primary peer group. We use all the relevant data points that result from this benchmarking. If the
primary peer group does not yield at least nine data points for a particular role, we include data for the companies in a
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
Executive Compensation | Compensation Discussion and Analysis
secondary peer group and, if needed, market data from other similar companies. For roles other than the CFO and
COO, FHFA may pre-approve the use of market data from companies in our secondary peer group on a case-by-case
basis even when nine data points have been obtained from the primary peer group. For the roles of CFO and COO, we
are required to apply a 20% discount to the benchmarking data.
Factors relevant to the selection of our peer group companies included their status as U.S. public companies, the
industry in which they operate and the size of their assets and employee population relative to ours. Our new primary
peer group consists of 20 companies in the regional banking, diversified banking, consumer finance, insurance, and
asset management industries, as well as Freddie Mac:
•
Ally Financial Inc.
•
KeyCorp
•
American Express Company
•
MetLife, Inc.
•
American International Group, Inc.
•
Northern Trust Corporation
•
The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation
•
The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc.
•
Capital One Financial Corporation
•
Principal Financial Group, Inc.
•
Chubb Limited
•
Prudential Financial, Inc.
•
Citizens Financial Group, Inc.
•
State Street Corporation
•
Discover Financial Services
•
Synchrony Financial
•
Fifth Third Bancorp
•
Truist Financial Corporation
•
Freddie Mac
•
U.S. Bancorp
•
The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc.
Our new secondary peer group consists of four large money center banks:
•
Bank of America Corporation
•
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
•
Citigroup Inc.
•
Wells Fargo & Company
In late 2023 , the Compensation and H uman Capital Committee r eviewed and discussed compensation benchmarking
data for our named executives other than Mr. Akwaboah, whose benchmarking was reviewed in early 2024 in
connection with his appointment. The b enchmarking was primarily based on 2022 performance year compensation at
peer companies, although in most cases 2023 base salary information was included if available. The named executives’
total target direct compensation was compared with compensation for the comparable position at companies in our
primary peer group, to the extent those companies had executives in comparable positions.
Compensation Recoupment Policies
Compensation Recoupment Policy
A portion of our executive officers’ compensation is subject to forfeiture or repayment upon the occurrence of specified
events. We provide a summary of these repayment provisions, also known as “clawback” provisions, in the table below.
Because our President and CEO does not receive deferred salary or incentive payments, the provisions in the table
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
Executive Compensation | Compensation Discussion and Analysis
below do not apply to Ms. Almodovar’s compensation. The full text of our repayment provisions is provided in
Exhibit 10.1 to this report.
Forfeiture Event
Compensation Subject to Forfeiture/Repayment
Materially Inaccurate Information
The executive officer has been granted deferred salary or
incentive payments based on materially inaccurate financial
statements or any other materially inaccurate performance
metric criteria.
Amounts of deferred salary and incentive payments
granted in excess of the amounts the Board of
Directors determines would likely have been granted
using accurate metrics.
Termination for Cause
The executive officer’s employment is terminated for cause.
For a description of what constitutes termination for cause, see
“ Compensation Tables and Other Information -Potential
Payments Upon Termination or Change-in-Control.”
All deferred salary and incentive payments that have
not yet become payable.
Subsequent Determination of Cause
The Board of Directors later determines (within a specified
period of time) that the executive officer could have been
terminated for cause and that the officer’s actions materially
harmed the business or reputation of the company.
Deferred salary and incentive payments to the extent
the Board of Directors deems appropriate.
Willful Misconduct
The executive officer’s employment:
• is terminated for cause (or the Board of Directors later
determines that cause for termination existed within a
specified period of time) due to willful misconduct in
connection with the performance of their duties for the
company; and
• the Board of Directors determines this has materially
harmed the business or reputation of the company.
All deferred salary and incentive payments that have
not yet become payable, and, to the extent the
Board of Directors deems appropriate, deferred
salary and annual incentives or long-term awards
paid in the two-year period prior to the officer’s
employment termination date.
In addition to these provisions, under Section 304 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, certain of the incentive-based
compensation for individuals serving as our CEO or CFO, including compensation received for prior years, could
become subject to reimbursement.
Because Fannie Mae is in conservatorship and not listed on a national securities exchange, we are not required to and
have not adopted a recoupment policy designed to comply with SEC and listing exchange rules requiring specific
provisions in such policies for listed companies.
Clawback Provision under Confidentiality and Proprietary Rights Agreement
In addition to the compensation recoupment policy described above, the named executives’ at-risk deferred salary is
subject to a compensation clawback provision pursuant to a Confidentiality and Proprietary Rights Agreement (the
“Agreement”) and related Covered Employee External Employment Activities Standard (the “Standard”). All specified
covered employees, including the named executives, are required to enter into the Agreement and are subject to the
Standard. Ms. Almodovar does not receive the at-risk deferred salary that is subject to the clawback provision.
Covered employees’ obligations under the Agreement include, among other things, compliance with the Standard. The
Agreement provides that, unless otherwise required by law, covered employees’ at-risk compensation is subject to
reduction, forfeiture, recoupment, and repayment for violations of the Standard. Covered employees are required to sign
a statement acknowledging their at-risk compensation is subject to these requirements.
The Standard defines the following as restricted activity: directly or indirectly seeking, negotiating, creating, developing
or accepting employment or other commercial and business opportunities in which the covered employee has a
personal interest outside of Fannie Mae with firms that have, or seek to have, a business relationship with Fannie Mae
either during, or within the six-month period following, the covered employee’s employment at Fannie Mae. To address
the risks associated with a covered employee engaging in restricted activities, the Standard requires covered
employees to:
• disclose timely prospective employment discussions in alignment with applicable Fannie Mae policies;
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
Executive Compensation | Compensation Discussion and Analysis
• abide by specified mitigation activities to address the conflicts of interest posed by such disclosures;
• for a six-month period after the termination of their Fannie Mae employment, refrain from representing any
person (including themselves) or any commercial entity to Fannie Mae or its employees in any way with respect
to any matter on which the covered employee had direct and substantial involvement or participation while
employed by Fannie Mae;
• maintain the confidentiality of Fannie Mae confidential information to which they had access in connection with
their Fannie Mae employment after termination of their Fannie Mae employment;
• inform Fannie Mae at the time of their departure whether they have accepted an offer of employment and/or
taken steps to form a new business and provide the name of the subsequent employer/company;
• abide by the one-year non-solicitation/non-inducement of key employees to leave provisions of the Agreement;
and
• inform any subsequent employer that engages in business with Fannie Mae of these requirements of the
Standard to the extent that they remain applicable.
A covered employee’s failure to comply with the above-listed requirements of the Standard would be a violation of the
Standard.
At-risk compensation for the named executives consists of the at-risk portion of deferred salary and excludes base
salary and the fixed portion of deferred salary. The current named executives may be subject to:
• forfeiture of up to 100% of at-risk deferred salary that has not yet been paid; and
• recoupment of up to 100% of at-risk deferred salary that was paid during the period one year before or ending
one year after the violation.
In determining whether to take these actions, the decisionmaker may consider the seriousness of the violation, the level
and responsibilities of the covered employee, the intentional nature of the conduct of the covered employee, whether
the covered employee was unjustly enriched, whether seeking the recovery would prejudice the company’s interests in
any way, including in a proceeding or investigation, and any other factors they deem relevant to the determination.
The full text of the company’s Confidentiality and Proprietary Rights Agreement is provided in Exhibit 10.21 to this report
and forms of the statement that covered employees are required to sign are provided in Exhibit 10.22 and Exhibit 10.23
to this report.
Policies Related to Stock Ownership and the Timing of Option Awards
We ceased paying new stock-based compensation to our executives after entering into conservatorship in September
2008, and our Board of Directors eliminated our stock ownership requirements in 2009. Because we do not issue stock-
based compensation, we do not have a specific policy regarding the timing of option awards.
Compensation Committee Report
The Compensation and Human Capital Committee of the Board of Directors of Fannie Mae has reviewed and discussed
the Compensation Discussion and Analysis included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K with management. Based on
such review and discussions, the Compensation and Human Capital Committee has recommended to the Board of
Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Compensation and Human Capital Committee:
Diane C. Nordin, Chair
Karin J. Kimbrough, Vice Chair
Manolo Sánchez
Michael Seelig
Compensation Risk Assessment
Our Corporate Risk & Compliance division conducted a risk assessment of our 2024 employee compensation policies
and practices. In conducting this risk assessment, the division reviewed the following, among other things:
• our compensation policy;
• our performance goals and performance appraisal process;
• our compensation structure (including incentives and pay mix);
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
Executive Compensation | Compensation Risk Assessment
• our severance arrangements and compensation clawback provisions;
• the restrictions on compensation applicable during conservatorship, including the limit on annual direct
compensation for our CEO role; and
• the oversight of aspects of our compensation by the Compensation and Human Capital Committee, the Board
of Directors and FHFA.
The division also assessed whether mitigating factors existed that would reduce the opportunity for inappropriate risk-
taking driven by our compensation policies and practices. The risk assessment of the company’s 2024 compensation
policies and practices was shared with the Compensation and Human Capital Committee.
Based on the risk assessment, management concluded that our 2024 employee compensation policies and practices do
not create risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the company. The following factors
contributed to this conclusion:
• the overall design of our compensation structure does not incentivize material risk taking;
• deferred salary for our executive officers is subject to clawback provisions;
• our control environment for compensation, including a defined and consistently applied annual performance
appraisal process; a comprehensive total rewards program, inclusive of adequate people, process and system
coverage to support that program; incentives for vice presidents, fellows and below; compensation adjustment
guidelines and criteria; succession planning; and retention planning and monitoring;
• our 2024 performance goals are neither designed nor intended to incentivize employees to engage in activities
contrary to our Employee Code of Conduct, risk appetite or any other activity that would involve taking
inappropriate risks or result in a material adverse effect on the company;
• our Board risk limits, which inhibit excessive risk taking, allow for transparency and action when the limits are
exceeded; the Board risk limits define the maximum amount of risk the company is willing to take in pursuit of
its objectives, and the company regularly monitors, reports and escalates limit levels and the actions that may
be taken to manage to risk limits; and
• informed decisions on compensation that include performance assessments, taking into account company
performance. Our performance evaluation process for primary business units does not vary, and performance
goals are not driven by profitability. We also do not prescribe incentives that are based solely on an employee’s
accomplishment of a single task or performance goal; nor do we have a performance horizon longer than one
year, and we do not include incentives with long- or short-term growth potential such as stock.
Management stated in its risk assessment that the cap on our CEO compensation under the Equity in Government
Compensation Act of 2015 continues to be a risk factor for the company. In addition, restrictions on our compensation
result in an asymmetrical approach to risk management because they prevent our incentivizing and rewarding
appropriate risk-taking. See “ Risk Factors - GSE and Conservatorship Risk ” for a discussion of the challenges and risks
posed by limitations on our executive and employee c ompensation .
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
Executive Compensation | Compensation Tables and Other Information
Compensation Tables and Other Information
Summary Compensation Table
The following table shows summary compensation information for the named executives for 2024 , 2023 , and 2022 .
Summary Compensation Table
Salary
Name and Principal Position
Year
Base
Salary (1)
Fixed Deferred
Salary
(Service-Based) (2)
Bonus (3)
Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation (4)
All Other
Compensation (5)
Total
Priscilla Almodovar
$ 600,000
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ 115,307
$ 715,307
President and CEO
600,000
-
-
-
94,467
694,467
46,154
-
-
-
-
46,154
Chryssa Halley
600,000
1,722,115
-
959,432
136,630
3,418,177
Executive Vice President
592,308
1,486,154
-
890,922
112,533
3,081,917
and CFO
500,000
1,018,462
-
642,882
58,386
2,219,730
Peter Akwaboah
369,231
1,246,154
1,250,000
667,432
116,515
3,649,332
Executive Vice President
and COO
Malloy Evans
600,000
1,648,077
-
928,843
129,594
3,306,514
Executive Vice President
592,308
1,486,154
-
890,922
108,394
3,077,778
Single Family
500,000
1,029,231
-
647,442
64,930
2,241,603
Anthony Moon
564,615
1,460,000
525,000
836,514
111,045
3,497,174
Executive Vice President
500,000
1,460,000
1,575,000
840,144
65,551
4,440,695
and CRO
(1) Consists of base salary paid during the year on a biweekly basis.
(2) Consists of the fixed, service-based portion of deferred salary. Unlike at-risk deferred salary, which is shown in the
“Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column, the fixed deferred salary shown in this column for 2024 generally
will be paid in installments in March, June, September and December of 2025 . Deferred salary accrues interest at
one-half of the one-year Treasury Bill rate in effect on the last business day preceding the year in which the deferred
salary is earned. For deferred salary earned in 2024 , this rate is 2.395% per year . For deferred salary earned in 2023
and 2022 , this rate was 2.365% and 0.195% p er ye ar, respectively. Interest payable on the named executives’ fixed
deferred salary earned in a given year is shown in the “All Other Compensation” column for that year. Fixed deferred
salary shown for 2023 was paid to our named executives during 2024 , and fixed deferred salary shown for 2022 was
paid to our named executives during 2023 .
(3) Consists of payments pursuant to sign-on awards Mr. Akwaboah and Mr. Moon received when they joined Fannie
Mae. These awards do not constitute bonuses under the STOCK Act as defined by FHFA. Mr. Akwaboah is
scheduled to receive a second and final installment pursuant to his award in 2025. See “Compensation Discussion
and Analysis-Elements of 2024 Executive Compensation-Sign-on Awards and Relocation Benefits” for more
information on the terms of these awards.
( 4 ) Consists of the performance-based at-risk portion of deferred salary earned during the year and interest payable on
that deferred salary. At-risk deferred salary shown for 2024 and 2023 generally will be paid in installments in March,
June, September and December of the second year after the performance year (so in 2026 for deferred salary
earned during 2024 ). Half of at-risk deferred salary shown for 2022 was paid to our named executives during 2023
and the remaining half was paid in 2024 . The table below provides more detail on the 2024 at-risk deferred salary
awarded to our named executives.
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
Executive Compensation | Compensation Tables and Other Information
Performance-Based At-Risk Deferred Salary
Name
2024 Corporate
Performance-Based
At-Risk Deferred
Salary
2024 Individual
Performance-Based
At-Risk Deferred
Salary
Interest Payable on
2024 At-Risk
Deferred Salary
Total
Priscilla Almodovar
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
Chryssa Halley
442,860
472,716
43,856
959,432
Peter Akwaboah
308,077
328,846
30,509
667,432
Malloy Evans
428,741
457,644
42,458
928,843
Anthony Moon
386,123
412,154
38,237
836,514
(5) The table below provides more detail on the amounts reported for 2024 in the “All Other Compensation” column.
All Other Compensation for 2024
Name
Company
Contributions
to
Retirement
Savings
(401(k)) Plan
Company
Credits to
Supplemental
Retirement
Savings
Plan
Matching
Charitable
Award
Program
Interest
Payable on
2024 Fixed
Deferred
Salary
Other
Total
Priscilla Almodovar
$ 27,600
$ 20,400
$ 5,000
$ -
$ 62,307
$ 115,307
Chryssa Halley
27,600
67,785
-
41,245
-
136,630
Peter Akwaboah
27,600
1,938
-
19,698
67,279
116,515
Malloy Evans
27,600
67,785
5,000
29,209
-
129,594
Anthony Moon
27,600
57,569
-
25,876
-
111,045
See “Pension Benefits” for the vesting provisions for company contributions to the Retirement Savings Plan and
“Nonqualified Deferred Compensation” for the vesting provisions for company credits to the Supplemental
Retirement Savings Plan.
Amounts shown in the “Matching Charitable Award Program” column consist of gifts we made on behalf of our
named executives under our matching charitable gifts program, under which gifts made by our employees and
directors to Internal Revenue Code Section 501(c)(3) charities were matched, up to an aggregate total of $5,000 for
the 2024 calendar year.
The amount shown for Ms. Almodovar in the “Other” column represents our incremental costs in providing her the
services of a car and executive protection driver to enhance her safety and security, pursuant to the recommendation
of a third-party security study. Some of these trips were provided by Fannie Mae security employees in a Fannie Mae
vehicle maintained for business-related transportation. Accordingly, we calculated our incremental costs of providing
secure transportation services based on (1) fuel costs incurred for trips in our vehicle and (2) the costs incurred to
retain the services of an executive security travel vendor for services not provided by Fannie Mae personnel. The
costs of these services are being reported as “All Other Compensation” as required by SEC disclosure rules. We
also provided internet surveillance services to Ms. Almodovar, for which we incurred no incremental costs. The
amount shown in the “Other” column for Mr. Akwaboah consists of our incremental costs for providing relocation
benefits in connection with his hire. These costs were for temporary lodging and transportation costs and include
fees and interest paid by Fannie Mae to the relocation benefit administrator.
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
Executive Compensation | Compensation Tables and Other Information
Plan-Based Awards
The following table shows the annual at-risk deferred salary targets for each of the named executives for 2024 . The
terms of 2024 at-risk deferred salary are described in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis-Elements of 2024
Executive Compensation-Direct Compensation.” Deferred salary amounts shown represent only the target
performance-based at-risk portion of the named executives’ 2024 deferred salary .
Grants of Plan-Based Awards in 2024
Estimated Future Payouts Under
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards (1)
Name
Award Type
Threshold
Target
Maximum
Priscilla Almodovar
At-risk deferred salary-Corporate
$ -
$ -
$ -
At-risk deferred salary-Individual
-
-
-
Total at-risk deferred salary
-
-
-
Chryssa Halley
At-risk deferred salary-Corporate
-
497,596
497,596
At-risk deferred salary-Individual
-
497,596
497,596
Total at-risk deferred salary
-
995,192
995,192
Peter Akwaboah
At-risk deferred salary-Corporate
-
346,154
346,154
At-risk deferred salary-Individual
-
346,154
346,154
Total at-risk deferred salary
-
692,308
692,308
Malloy Evans
At-risk deferred salary-Corporate
-
481,731
481,731
At-risk deferred salary-Individual
-
481,731
481,731
Total at-risk deferred salary
-
963,462
963,462
Anthony Moon
At-risk deferred salary-Corporate
-
433,846
433,846
At-risk deferred salary-Individual
-
433,846
433,846
Total at-risk deferred salary
-
867,692
867,692
(1) Amounts shown are the target amounts of the performance-based at-risk portion of the named executives’ 2024
deferred salary. Half of 2024 at-risk deferred salary was subject to reduction based on corporate performance
against the 2024 scorecard and half was subject to reduction based on individual performance in 2024 , taking into
account corporate performance against the 2024 Board of Directors’ goals. No amounts are shown in the
“Threshold” column because deferred salary does not specify a minimum amount payable. The amounts shown in
the “Maximum” column are the same as the amounts shown in the “Target” column because amounts higher than the
target amount of at-risk deferred salary could not be awarded. The actual amounts of the at-risk portion of deferred
salary that will be paid to the named executives for 2024 performance are included in the “Non-Equity Incentive Plan
Compensation” column of the “Summary Compensation Table.”
Pension Benefits
Retirement Savings Plan
The Retirement Savings Plan is a tax-qualified defined contribution plan for which all of our employees are generally
eligible that includes a 401(k) before-tax feature, a regular after-tax feature and a Roth after-tax feature. Under the plan,
eligible employees may allocate investment balances to a variety of investment options.
We match in cash employee contributions to the plan up to 6% of base salary and eligible incentive compensation,
subject to applicable IRS limits. This matching contribution is immediately vested. We also make a cash contribution to
the plan equal to 2% of base salary and eligible incentive compensation, subject to applicable IRS limits. Participants
are fully vested in this 2% contribution after three years of service.
Nonqualified Deferred Compensation
Supplemental Retirement Savings Plan
We provide nonqualified deferred compensation to the named executives pursuant to our Supplemental Retirement
Savings Plan. Our Supplemental Retirement Savings Plan is an unfunded, non-tax-qualified defined contribution plan.
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
Executive Compensation | Compensation Tables and Other Information
The Supplemental Retirement Savings Plan is intended to supplement our Retirement Savings Plan, or 401(k) plan, by
providing benefits to participants whose eligible earnings exceed the IRS annual limit on eligible compensation for
401(k) plans (for 2024 , the annual eligible earnings limit was $345,000).
For the 2024 plan year, we credited 8% of the eligible compensation for our named executives that exceeded the
applicable IRS annual limit. Eligible compensation in any year consists of base salary plus any eligible incentive
compensation (which includes deferred salary) earned for that year, up to a combined maximum of two times base
salary. The 8% credit consists of two parts: (1) a 2% credit that vests after the participant has completed three years of
service with us; and (2) a 6% credit that is immediately vested.
While the Supplemental Retirement Savings Plan is not funded, amounts credited on behalf of a participant under the
Supplemental Retirement Savings Plan are deemed to be invested in mutual fund investments selected by the
participant that are similar to the investments offered under our Retirement Savings Plan.
Amounts deferred under the Supplemental Retirement Savings Plan are payable to participants in the January or July
following separation from service with us, subject to a six-month delay in payment for our 50 most highly compensated
officers. Participants generally may not withdraw amounts from the Supplemental Retirement Savings Plan while they
are employees.
The table below provides information on the nonqualified deferred compensation of the named executives in 2024 , all of
which was provided pursuant to our Supplemental Retirement Savings Plan.
Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation for 2024
Name
Company
Contributions
in 2024 (1)
Aggregate
Earnings in
2024 (2)
Aggregate
Balance at
December 31,
2024 (3)
Priscilla Almodovar
$ 20,400
$ 2,422
$ 45,772
Chryssa Halley
67,785
86,380
942,981
Peter Akwaboah
1,938
(15)
1,924
Malloy Evans
67,785
131,608
937,948
Anthony Moon
57,569
3,800
75,826
(1) All amounts reported in this column are also reported as 2024 compensation in the “All Other Compensation” column
of the “Summary Compensation Table.”
(2) None of the earnings reported in this column are reported as 2024 compensation in the “Summary Compensation
Table” because the earnings are neither above-market nor preferential.
(3) Amounts reported in this column reflect company contributions to the Supplemental Retirement Savings Plan that
are also reported in the “All Other Compensation” column of the “Summary Compensation Table” as follows:
Balance Amounts Reported in “All Other Compensation” in the Summary Compensation Table
Name
Amounts in Aggregate Balance
Column that Represent Company
Contributions Reported as
Compensation for 2023 in the
Summary Compensation Table
Amounts in Aggregate Balance
Column that Represent Company
Contributions Reported as
Compensation for 2022 in the
Summary Compensation Table
Priscilla Almodovar
$ 21,600
$ -
Chryssa Halley
50,985
38,100
Peter Akwaboah
-
-
Malloy Evans
50,985
39,623
Anthony Moon
13,600
-
Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change-in-Control
The information below describes and quantifies certain compensation and benefits that would have become payable to
each of our current named executives under our existing plans and arrangements if the named executive’s employment
had terminated on December 31, 2024 under each of the circumstances described below, taking into account the
named executive’s compensation and service levels as of that date. The discussion below does not reflect retirement or
deferred compensation plan benefits to which our named executives may be entitled, as these benefits are described
above under “Pension Benefits” and “Nonqualified Deferred Compensation.” The information below also does not
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
Executive Compensation | Compensation Tables and Other Information
generally reflect compensation and benefits available to all salaried employees upon termination of employment with us
under similar circumstances. We are not obligated to provide any additional compensation to our named executives in
connection with a change-in-control.
Potential Payments to Named Executives
We have not entered into agreements with any of our named executives that would entitle the executive to severance
benefits. If a named executive’s employment terminated for any reason other than for cause, the named executive
would be entitled to receive a specified portion of their unpaid deferred salary that was earned in 2023 and 2024 .
Below we discuss various elements of the current named executives’ compensation that would become payable in the
event a named executive dies, resigns, retires, terminates employment due to long-term disability, or the company
terminates their employment. We then quantify the amounts that would be paid to our named executives in these
circumstances, in each case assuming the triggering event occurred on December 31, 2024 . Named executives’
deferred salary may also be subject to reduction, forfeiture, recoupment or repayment in the event of a forfeiture event
under our Compensation Recoupment Policy or a violation of our Covered Employee External Employment Activities
Standard, as described in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis-Compensation Recoupment Policies.”
• Deferred salary
◦ Termination other than for cause. If a named executive is separated from employment with the company for
any reason other than termination for cause, they would receive the following:
▪ Fixed deferred salary. The earned but unpaid portion of their fixed deferred salary, reduced by 2% for
each full or partial month by which the named executive’s termination precedes January 31 of the
second year following the performance year (or, if later, the end of the twenty-fourth month following
the month in which the named executive first earned deferred salary), except that the reduction will
not apply if: (1) at the time of separation the named executive has reached age 62, or age 55 with ten
years of service with Fannie Mae, or (2) the named executive’s employment terminates as a result of
death or long-term disability.
▪ At-risk deferred salary. The earned but unpaid portion of their at-risk deferred salary, subject to
reduction from the target level for corporate and individual performance for the applicable
performance year, except that the reduction will not apply if an officer’s employment terminates as a
result of death or long-term disability prior to the Board of Directors’ and FHFA’s determinations of
performance for at-risk deferred salary.
▪ Interest on deferred salary. Interest on deferred salary payments. Deferred salary accrues interest at
one-half of the one-year Treasury Bill rate in effect on the last business day preceding the year in
which the deferred salary is earned.
▪ Payment dates. Installment payments of deferred salary and related interest would be made on the
original payment schedule, except that payments will be made within 90 days in case of the named
executive’s death.
◦ Termination for cause. If we terminate a named executive’s employment for cause, the named executive
would not receive any of the earned but unpaid portion of their deferred salary. The named executive’s
employment will be considered to have been terminated for cause if we determine that the executive has:
(a) materially harmed the company by, in connection with the performance of their duties for Fannie Mae,
engaging in gross misconduct or performing their duties in a grossly negligent manner; or (b) been convicted
of, or pleaded nolo contendere with respect to, a felony.
• Retiree medical benefits. We currently make certain retiree medical benefits available to our full-time employees
who meet certain age and service requirements at the time of retirement.
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
Executive Compensation | Compensation Tables and Other Information
The table below shows the amounts that would have become payable to each of our current named executives if their
employment had terminated on December 31, 2024 for the reasons specified. No amounts are shown for Ms.
Almodovar, as she did not receive deferred salary.
Potential Payments Upon Termination as of December 31, 2024
Name
2024 Fixed
Deferred
Salary (1)
2024 At-Risk
Deferred
Salary (2)
Interest on
Deferred
Salary (3)
Remaining
Unpaid 2023
At-Risk
Deferred
Salary (4)
Interest on
Remaining
Unpaid 2023
At-Risk
Deferred
Salary (5)
Priscilla Almodovar
Resignation, retirement, or termination
without cause
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
Long-term disability
-
-
-
-
-
Death
-
-
-
-
-
Termination for cause
-
-
-
-
-
Chryssa Halley
Resignation, retirement, or termination
without cause
1,722,115
915,576
85,101
850,685
40,237
Long-term disability
1,722,115
995,192
88,915
850,685
40,237
Death
1,722,115
995,192
37,963
850,685
32,419
Termination for cause
-
-
-
-
-
-
Peter Akwaboah
Resignation, retirement, or termination
without cause
822,462
636,923
50,207
-
-
Long-term disability
1,246,154
692,308
63,007
-
-
Death
1,246,154
692,308
20,311
-
-
Termination for cause
-
-
-
-
-
Malloy Evans
Resignation, retirement, or termination
without cause
1,219,577
886,385
71,667
850,685
40,237
Long-term disability
1,648,077
963,462
85,621
850,685
40,237
Death
1,648,077
963,462
37,099
850,685
32,419
Termination for cause
-
-
-
-
-
Anthony Moon
Resignation, retirement, or termination
without cause
1,080,400
798,277
64,113
802,200
37,944
Long-term disability
1,460,000
867,692
76,529
802,200
37,944
Death
1,460,000
867,692
34,285
802,200
30,647
Termination for cause
-
-
-
-
-
(1) In the case of resignation, retirement or termination without cause, Mr. Akwaboah, Mr. Evans and Mr. Moon each
would have received 74% of their 2024 fixed deferred salary, which is the earned but unpaid portion of their 2024
fixed deferred salary as of December 31, 2024 , reduced by 2% for each full or partial month by which their
separation from employment preceded January 31, 2026 . Ms. Halley would have received 100% of her 2024 fixed
deferred salary, with no reduction, because she had reached age 55 with ten years of service with Fannie Mae.
(2) The amounts in this column in the event of resignation, retirement, or termination without cause reflect the corporate
and individual performance determinations affecting 2024 at-risk deferred salary. The amounts in this column in the
event of a termination due to death or long-term disability do not reflect any performance-based reduction, because
the hypothetical December 31, 2024 termination date occurred prior to the performance determinations for at-risk
deferred salary in early 2025 .
(3) Interest payable on the payments of 2024 deferred salary, which reflects that: (a) in the event of resignation,
retirement, termination without cause, or long-term disability, installment payments of 2024 deferred salary would be
paid on the original payment schedule, as described in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis-Elements of 2024
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
Executive Compensation | Compensation Tables and Other Information
Executive Compensation; and (b) in the event of death, payments of deferred salary would be made within 90 days
of the executive’s death. Interest on 2024 deferred salary payments accrues at an annual rate of 2.395% .
(4) At-risk deferred salary earned in 2023 is paid in quarterly installments during 2025 . The amounts in this column
reflect the portion of 2023 at-risk deferred salary that was earned but remained unpaid as of December 31, 2024
and, accordingly, reflects the corporate and individual performance determinations made in early 2024 .
(5) Interest payable on the payments of 2023 deferred salary, which reflects that: (a) in the event of resignation,
retirement, termination without cause, or long-term disability, installment payments of deferred salary would be paid
on the original payment schedule; and (b) in the event of death, payments of deferred salary would be made within
90 days of the executive’s death. Interest on 2023 deferred salary payments accrues at an annual rate of 2.365% .
CEO to Median Employee Pay Ratio
The following table shows the compensation paid to our CEO for 2024 , the total 2024 compensation of our median
employee (which was calculated based on the methodology described below the table), and the estimated ratio of the
CEO’s pay to the median employee’s pay for 2024 .
2024 President and CEO to Median Employee Pay Ratio
Individual
Compensation
Ratio
President and CEO
$ 715,307
4.0 to 1
Median Employee
180,743
We took the following steps to identify our median employee and determine this employee’s compensation:
• We identified our employee population as of the last day of our final pay period in 2024, December 28, 2024 .
On that date, we had approximately 8,200 full-time and part-time employees.
• In order to identify the median employee, we considered for each employee other than our President and CEO
the sum of their salary for 2024 (including any overtime pay), performance awards paid in 2024 and the value
of company contributions made in 2024 on their behalf to retirement plans. We did not annualize the
compensation of employees who were employed for less than the full year, nor did we make any full-time
equivalent adjustments to part-time employees. For employees whose sum fell at or close to the midpoint, we
considered their 2024 benefits and awards and other relevant factors and identified an employee whose
compensation best reflected Fannie Mae employees’ median 2024 compensation.
• We then determined that median employee’s total 2024 compensation using the approach required by the SEC
when calculating our named executives’ compensation, as reported in the Summary Compensation Table.
In general, we offer employees salary, the opportunity to receive awards for performance, company retirement plan
contributions and other benefits. In accordance with SEC rules, the median employee compensation amount for 2024
provided in the table above consists of salary, an award for 2024 performance and company retirement plan
contributions, but does not reflect benefits relating to group life or health plans generally available to all salaried
employees, parking or transit benefits that are generally available to all salaried employees, or personal benefits with an
aggregate value of less than $10,000.
Given the different methodologies that companies may use to determine their CEO pay ratios, the estimated ratio we
report above may not be comparable to that reported by other companies.
Director Compensation
Overview
FHFA’s Corporate Governance regulations provide that we may pay Board members reasonable and appropriate
compensation for the time required of them, and their necessary and reasonable expenses, in the performance of their
duties. Our non-management directors receive cash compensation pursuant to a program authorized by FHFA in 2008.
The compensation we provide to directors has not increased since this program was implemented in 2008.
Ms. Almodovar served on our Board of Directors in 2024 in connection with her service as CEO. We did not provide her
any additional compensation for her service on the Board of Directors.
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
Executive Compensation | Director Compensation
Board Compensation Levels
Board compensation levels under the program authorized by FHFA are shown in the table below. Our directors receive
no equity compensation and no meeting fees.
Board Compensation Levels
Board Service
Cash Compensation
Annual retainer for non-executive Chair
$ 290,000
Annual retainer for non-management directors (other than the non-executive Chair)
160,000
Committee Service
Cash Compensation
Annual retainer for Audit Committee Chair
$ 25,000
Annual retainer for Risk Policy and Capital Committee Chair
15,000
Annual retainer for all other Committee Chairs
10,000
Annual retainer for Audit Committee members (other than the Audit Committee Chair)
10,000
Additional Arrangements with our Non-Management Directors
Expenses. We pay for or reimburse directors for out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with their service on the
Board of Directors, including travel to and from our meetings, accommodations, meals and education.
Matching Charitable Gifts Program. Gifts made in 2024 by our directors and employees to Internal Revenue Code
Section 501(c)(3) charities were matched up to an aggregate total of $5,000 for the calendar year.
Stock Ownership Guidelines for Directors. In 2009, our Board of Directors eliminated our stock ownership requirements
for directors.
2024 Non-Management Director Compensation
The total 2024 compensation for our non-management directors is shown in the table below.
2024 Non-Management Director Compensation Table
Name
Fees Earned
or Paid
in Cash
All Other
Compensation (1)
Total
Amy Alving
$ 175,000
$ -
$ 175,000
Christopher Brummer
160,000
-
160,000
Renée Glover
170,000
-
170,000
Michael Heid
290,000
-
290,000
Simon Johnson
170,000
5,000
175,000
Karin Kimbrough
170,000
-
170,000
Diane Lye (2)
106,962
-
106,962
Diane Nordin
180,000
5,000
185,000
Chet Ragavan
160,000
5,000
165,000
Manolo Sánchez
160,000
5,000
165,000
Michael Seelig
180,792
-
180,792
Scott Stowell (3)
24,889
-
24,889
Former director
Robert Herz (4)
89,208
-
89,208
(1) Amounts shown in the “All Other Compensation” column consist of gifts we made on behalf of the directors under our
matching charitable gifts program.
(2) Dr. Lye joined Fannie Mae’s Board of Directors in May 2024.
(3) Mr. Stowell joined Fannie Mae’s Board of Directors in November 2024.
(4) Mr. Herz resigned from Fannie Mae’s Board of Directors in June 2024.
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters |
Beneficial Ownership

---

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and
Management and Related Stockholder Matters
Beneficial Ownership
Stock Ownership of Directors and Executive Officers
The following table shows the beneficial ownership of our stock by each of our directors, each of our named executives,
and all directors and executive officers as a group, as of February 1, 2025 . As of that date, no director or named
executive, nor all directors and executive officers as a group, owned as much as 1% of our outstanding common stock
or owned any series of our preferred stock.
Beneficial Ownership of Stock by Directors and Executive Officers
Directors and Named Executives
Position
Number of Shares of
Common Stock
Beneficially Owned (1)
Amy Alving
Director
Christopher Brummer
Director
Renée Glover
Director
Michael Heid
Director (Board Chair)
Simon Johnson
Director
Karin Kimbrough
Director
Diane Lye
Director
Diane Nordin
Director
Chet Ragavan
Director
Manolo Sánchez
Director
Michael Seelig
Director
Scott Stowell
Director
Priscilla Almodovar
President, CEO and Director
Chryssa Halley
Executive Vice President and CFO
Peter Akwaboah
Executive Vice President and COO
Malloy Evans
Executive Vice President-Single-Family
Anthony Moon
Executive Vice President and CRO
All directors and executive officers as a group (20 persons) (2)
29,169
(1) Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the SEC for computing the number of shares of
common stock beneficially owned by each person and the percentage owned. Each holder has sole investment and
voting power over the shares referenced in this table, except that Mr. Akwaboah shares investment and voting power
over his shares with his spouse and one other executive officer shares investment and voting power for 9,146 shares
with their spouse. None of our directors, named executives or other executive officers held any series of our
preferred stock as of the date of this table.
(2) Group consists of all current directors, named executives, and all other current executive officers (some of whom are
not listed in the table above).
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters |
Beneficial Ownership
Stock Ownership of Greater-Than 5% Holders
The following table shows the beneficial ownership of our common stock by the only person or entity we know of that
held more than 5% of our common stock as of February 1, 2025 .
Beneficial Ownership of Stock by 5%+ Holders (1)
5%+ Holders
Common Stock
Beneficially
Owned
Percent
of Class
U.S. Department of the Treasury
1500 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20220
Variable (2)
79.9 %
(1) Pershing Square Capital Management, L.P., PS Management GP, LLC, and William A. Ackman (“Pershing”) filed a
Schedule 13D with the SEC on November 15, 2013, and an amendment to the Schedule 13D on March 31, 2014. In
that amendment, Pershing reported a beneficial ownership of 115,569,796 shares of common stock, or 9.98% of our
1,158,080,657 shares of common stock outstanding as of January 31, 2014, as reported in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K filed on February 21, 2014. In the amendment, Pershing reported additional economic exposure to
approximately 15,434,715 notional shares of common stock under certain cash-settled total return swaps, bringing
their total aggregate economic exposure to 131,004,511 shares of common stock (approximately 11.31% of the
outstanding common stock on January 31, 2014). Information regarding these shares and the ownership interests of
their holders is based solely on information contained in the Schedule 13D and the amendment to the Schedule 13D.
In the amendment, Pershing indicated that they would forgo future reporting on Schedule 13D based on their
determination that shares of the common stock are not voting securities as such term is used in Rule 13d-1(i) under
the Exchange Act. As a result, this information does not reflect any acquisitions or dispositions that occurred after
March 31, 2014, and we do not know Pershing’s current beneficial ownership of our common stock.
(2) In September 2008, we issued to Treasury a warrant to purchase, for one one-thousandth of a cent ($0.00001) per
share, shares of our common stock equal to 79.9% of the total number of shares of our common stock outstanding
on a fully diluted basis at the time the warrant is exercised. The warrant may be exercised in whole or in part at any
time until September 7, 2028. As of February 14, 2025 , Treasury has not exercised the warrant. The information
above assumes Treasury beneficially owns no other shares of our common stock.
Equity Compensation Plan Information
As of December 31, 2024 , we had no outstanding options, warrants or rights under any equity compensation plan.
Although we have a legacy equity compensation plan that was previously approved by stockholders, our 1985
Employee Stock Purchase Plan, we do not anticipate issuing additional shares under that plan. Moreover, we are
prohibited from issuing any stock or other equity securities as compensation without the approval of FHFA and the prior
written consent of Treasury under the senior preferred stock purchase agreement, except under limited circumstances.

---

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and
Director Independence
Policies and Procedures Relating to Transactions with Related
Persons
Overview . We review transactions in which Fannie Mae is a participant and in which we have reason to believe any of
our directors or executive officers or their immediate family members may have a material interest to determine whether
any of those persons has or will have a material interest in the transaction. Our written policies and procedures for the
review, approval or ratification of transactions with related persons we must report under Item 404(a) of Regulation S-K
are set forth in our :
• Director Code of Conduct;
• Corporate Governance Guidelines;
• Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Charter;
• Board of Directors’ delegation of authorities and reservation of powers;
• Employee Code of Conduct; and
• Oversight of Designated Executive Officers’ Conflicts of Interest and Business Courtesies Matters Policy.
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence |
Policies and Procedures Relating to Transactions with Related Persons
In addition, depending on the circumstances, relationships and transactions with related persons may require
conservator decision pursuant to the instructions issued to the Board of Directors by the conservator or may require the
consent of Treasury pursuant to the senior preferred stock purchase agreemen t .
D irector Code of Conduct . Our directors owe their fiduciary duties of care and loyalty solely to the conservator. Our
Director Code of Conduct prohibits them from engaging in conduct or activity that is inconsistent with our best interests,
as defined by the conservator’s express directions, its policies and applicable law. Our Director Code of Conduct
requires our directors to excuse themselves from voting on any issue before the Board that could result in a conflict,
self-dealing or other circumstance where their position as directors would be detrimental to us or result in a
noncompetitive, favored or unfair advantage to either themselves or their associates. In addition, our directors must
disclose any situation that involves or appears to involve a conflict of interest to the Chair of the Nominating and
Corporate Governance Committee or another member of the Committee . This includes, for example, a financial interest
of a director, an immediate family member of a director or a business associate of a director in any transaction being
considered by the Board. Directors must also disclose any financial interest they have in an organization doing business
with us. The Committee Chair or member receiving such information must report it to our General Counsel, and the
Committee must consider the issue and take further action as necessary. Our directors must comply with the company’s
procedures for the review, approval, or ratification of related person transactions. Each of our directors also must
annually certify compliance with our Director Code of Conduct. Our Director Code of Conduct also requires any director
who serves as an officer of Fannie Mae to disclose any conflict or apparent conflict to Fannie Mae’s Chief Compliance
Officer or designee and to comply with our Employee Code of Conduct as well as our Director Code of Conduct .
Corporate Governance Guidelines. Our Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that our Board of Directors,
directly or through its committees, reviews and approves any action that in the reasonable business judgment of
management at the time the action is taken is likely to cause significant reputational risk to Fannie Mae or result in
substantial negative publicity. Depending on management’s business judgment, this requirement might apply to a
related person transaction.
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Charter. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
Charter requires the Committee to conduct a reasonable prior review and oversight of transactions with any directors,
nominees for director or executive officer, or any immediate family member of any of them, that we must report under
Item 404 of Regulation S-K . The Committee must prohibit such a transaction if it determines inconsistency with our
interests.
Board Delegation of Authorities and Reservation of Powers. Our Board’s delegation of authorities and reservation
of powers requires the Board to approve any action that in the reasonable business judgment of management would
result in substantial negative publicity regarding our business practices and may cause a decline in public perception
and the customer base, costly litigation, revenue reductions, or a comprehensive income loss, or otherwise are likely to
cause us negative publicity. Depending on management’s business judgment, this requirement might apply to a related
person transaction. Our Board’s delegation of authorities and reservation of powers also requires the same Committee
review and oversight as the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Charter described immediately above.
Employee Code of Conduct. Our Employee Code of Conduct requires our employees to seek to avoid any actual or
apparent conflicts between our business interests and their personal interests, activities, and relationships. It also
requires them to seek to avoid situations that could expose the company to reputational risk. Our Employee Code of
Conduct requires our employees to raise compliance or ethics concerns, including concerns relating to suspected or
known violations of our Employee Code of Conduct, with any people manager or officer of the company, a member of
our Human Resources division or our Compliance and Ethics division.
Designated Executive Officer Conflicts Policy. Our Oversight of Designated Executive Officers’ Conflicts of Interest
and Business Courtesies Matters Policy (“Designated Executive Officer Conflicts Policy”) requires that our executive
officers report to the Compliance and Ethics division any transaction , series of transactions, arrangement, or
relationships with us in which the executive officer or any immediate family member of the executive officer has a direct
or indirect interest, including any transaction that is required to be disclosed under Item 404(a) of Regulation S-K . The
Designated Executive Officer Conflicts Policy provides that the Compliance and Ethics division will present
documentation of relevant facts on each reported transaction to the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee.
The Designated Executive Officer Conflicts Policy also provides that, if the Compliance and Ethics division has
determined the reported transaction poses a conflict or if the reported transaction involves the CEO, the division will
submit its initial determination and any recommended mitigation activities regarding such transaction to the Nominating
and Corporate Governance Committee to approve, deny or further condition.
Conservator Instructions . We are required by the conservator to obtain its decision for various matters, some of which
may involve relationships or transactions with related persons. These matters include: actions requiring the consent of
or consultation with Treasury under the senior preferred stock purchase agreement (including any declaration of
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence |
Policies and Procedures Relating to Transactions with Related Persons
dividends and transactions with affiliates on terms less favorable to us than comparable arms’ length transactions) ; the
creation of any subsidiary or affiliate, or entering into a substantial transaction with a subsidiary or affiliate, except for
routine ongoing transactions with CSS or the creation of, or a transaction with, a subsidiary or affiliate undertaken in the
ordinary course of business; changes in employee compensation that could significantly impact our employees; new
compensation arrangements with or increases in compensation or benefits for our executive officers; setting or
increasing the compensation or benefits payable to members of the Board; and changes in our business operations,
activities, and transactions that in the reasonable business judgment of management are more likely than not to result in
a significant increase in credit, market, reputational, operational or other key risks.
Senior Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement. The senior preferred stock purchase agreement requires us to obtain
written Treasury approval of transactions with affiliates unless, among other things, the transaction is upon terms no
less favorable to us than would be obtained in a comparable arm’s-length transaction with a non-affiliate or the
transaction is undertaken in the ordinary course or pursuant to a contractual obligation or customary employment
arrangement in existence at the time the senior preferred stock purchase agreement was entered into.
Director and Officer Disclosures. We require our directors and executive officers, not less than annually, to describe
to us any transaction with us in which a director or executive officer could potentially have an interest that would require
disclosure under Item 404 of Regulation S-K.
Transactions with Related Persons
Transactions with Treasury
Treasury beneficially owns more than 5% of the outstanding shares of our common stock by virtue of the warrant we
issued to Treasury on September 7, 2008. The warrant entitles Treasury to purchase shares of our common stock equal
to 79.9% of our outstanding common stock on a fully diluted basis on the date of exercise, for an exercise price of
$0.00001 per share, and is exercisable in whole or in part at any time on or before September 7, 2028. We describe
below our current agreements with Treasury, as well as payments we are making to Treasury pursuant to the Temporary
Payroll Tax Cut Continuation Act of 2011, the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act and the GSE Act.
FHFA, as conservator, approved the senior preferred stock purchase agreement, the amendments to the agreement
and the letter agreements relating to the agreement , the senior preferred stock, and the warrant .
Treasury Senior Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement , Senior Preferred Stock, and
Warrant
We issued the warrant to Treasury pursuant to the terms of the senior preferred stock purchase agreement we entered
into with Treasury in September 2008. Under the senior preferred stock purchase agreement, we also issued to
Treasury one million shares of senior preferred stock. We issued the warrant and the senior preferred stock as an initial
commitment fee in consideration of Treasury’s commitment to provide funds to us under the terms and conditions set
forth in the senior preferred stock purchase agreement. The senior preferred stock purchase agreement was
subsequently amended in September 2008, May 2009, December 2009 and August 2012. We, through FHFA, in its
capacity as conservator, and Treasury entered into letter agreements modifying the senior preferred stock purchase
agreement, the senior preferred stock and/or the warrant in December 2017, September 2019, January 2021,
September 2021 and January 2025. See “ Business - Conservatorship and Treasury Agreements - Treasury
Agreements ” for a description of the terms, as amended, of the senior preferred stock purchase agreement, the senior
preferred stock and the warrant.
As of December 31, 2024 , we had received an aggregate of $119.8 billion from Treasury under the senior preferred
stock purchase agreement, none of which was received in 2024 , and the remaining amount of funding available to us
under the agreement was $113.9 billion . Through December 31, 2024 , we had paid an aggregate of $181.4 billion to
Treasury in dividends on the senior preferred stock, none of which was paid in 2024 .
Obligation to Pay TCCA Fees to Treasury
In December 2011, Congress enacted the Temporary Payroll Tax Cut Continuation Act of 2011 which, among other
provisions, required that we increase our single-family guaranty fees by at least 10 basis points and pay this increase to
Treasury. To meet our obligations under the TCCA and at the direction of FHFA, we increased the guaranty fee on all
single-family mortgages delivered to us by 10 basis points in April 2012. In November 2021, the Infrastructure
Investment and Jobs Act was enacted, which extended to October 1, 2032 our obligation under the TCCA to collect 10
basis points in guaranty fees on single-family mortgages delivered to us and pay the associated revenue to Treasury. In
January 2022, FHFA advised us to continue to collect and pay these TCCA fees on and after October 1, 2032 with
respect to loans we acquired before this date until those loans are paid off or otherwise liquidated . In 2024 , we
recognized $3.4 billion for our obligations to Treasury under the TCCA.
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence |
Transactions with Related Persons
Treasury Interest in Affordable Housing Allocations
The GSE Act requires us to set aside in each fiscal year an amount equal to 4.2 basis points for each dollar of the
unpaid principal balance of our total new business purchases and to pay this amount to specified HUD and Treasury
funds. New business purchases consist of single-family and multifamily whole mortgage loans purchased during the
period and single-family and multifamily mortgage loans underlying Fannie Mae MBS issued during the period pursuant
to lender swaps. In December 2014, FHFA directed us to set aside amounts for these contributions during each fiscal
year, except for any fiscal year for which a draw from Treasury was made under the terms of the senior preferred stock
purchase agreement, or in which such allocation or transfer would cause such a draw. We paid $155 million to the funds
in 2024 based on our new business purchases in 2023 . Pursuant to the GSE Act and directions from FHFA, we paid
$54 million of this amount to Treasury’s Capital Magnet Fund and $101 million of this amount to HUD’s Housing Trust
Fund.
Our new business purchases were $381.1 billion for the year ended December 31, 2024 . Accordingly, we recognized an
expense of $160 million related to this obligation for the year ended December 31, 2024 . Of this amount, $56 million is
payable to Treasury’s Capital Magnet Fund and $104 million is payable to HUD’s Housing Trust Fund. We expect to pay
these amounts to the funds in 2025 .
Director Independence
Independence Requirements
Our Corporate Governance Guidelines, in accordance with FHFA corporate governance regulations, require a majority
of Fannie Mae’s directors to be independent as defined under the rules set forth by the NYSE, as amended from time to
time. The Board determines whether a relationship is material to independence, and whether a Board member is
independent, based upon the recommendation of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and in
accordance with NYSE rules. Our Corporate Governance Guidelines also provide that the Board must determine an
independent director has n o material relationship with us, either directly or through an organization that has a material
relationship with us; for this purpose, a relationship is “material” if, in the judgment of the Board, it would interfere with
the Board member’s independent judgment. Our Corporate Governance Guidelines are posted on our website,
www.fanniemae.com, under “Corporate Governance Guidelines” in the “About Us-Corporate Governance” section.
In addition, under FHFA corporate governance regulations, Board committee members must meet the independence
requirements set forth under NYSE rules. The NYSE’s listing standards include additional independence criteria for
members of the Audit Committee and Compensation and Human Capital Committee.
Our Board of Director s
Our Board of Directors, with the assistance of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of the Board, has
reviewed the independence of all current Board members pursuant to the requirements described in “Independence
Requirements” above. Based on its review, the Board has determined that all of our current directors are independent,
other than Ms. Almodovar ( because she is our Pres ident and CEO). Our Board of Directors also determined Robert
Herz was independent during his 2024 service on our Board of Directors. The Board of Directors considered the
following relationships, transactions or arrangements and determined they were not material to Board member
independence :
• Board Memberships with Business Partners . Dr. Brummer , Ms. Glover, Mr. Heid, Mr. Herz, Ms. Kimbrough, Ms.
Nordin, Mr. Sánchez, and Mr. Stowell are, were, or expect to be directors or advisory Board members of
companies that engage in business with Fannie Mae or that have an interest in one or more entities that engage in
business with Fannie Mae. The Board considered that each of these directors was solely a director or advisory
board member of such company, and none of these directors served in a management role or had ownership
interests other than as incidental to their board service. The Board also considered other relevant information
including, to the extent available, information regarding payments between these companies and Fannie Mae
during the past three years.
• Board Memberships with Investors in Our Fixed Income Securities. Mr. Herz, Ms. Kimbroug h, and Ms. Nordin
serve as directors or advisory Board members of companies that invest or may i nvest in Fannie Mae fixed-income
securities. It is generally not possible for Fannie Mae to determine the extent of the holdings of these companies in
Fannie Mae fixed-income securities as payments to holders are made through the Federal Reserve, and most of
these securities are held in turn by financial intermediaries. We understand that the investments by these
companies in Fannie Mae fixed-income securities are entered into at arm’s length in the ordinary course of
business, upon market terms and conditions, and are not entered into at the direction of, or upon approval by, the
director in his or her capacity as a director or advisory Board member of these companies.
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence | Director Independence
• Current Employment with Business Partners . Dr. Brummer, Dr. Johnson and Ms. Kimbrough are each employed at
entities that engage in business with Fannie Mae.
◦ Dr. Brummer is a columnist at CQ Roll Call, a provider of congressional news, legislative tracking, and
advocacy services. He is also the co-founder of a podcast that is affiliated with CQ Roll Call. Fannie Mae pays
subscription fees providing access to CQ Roll Call. The payments made by Fannie Mae to CQ Roll Call during
the past three years fall below the NYSE independence standards’ thresholds of materiality for a director who is
a current employee of a company to which Fannie Mae made, or from which Fannie Mae received, payments.
◦ Dr. Brummer is a professor at Georgetown University Law Center and founder of the DC Fintech Week
conference. In 2024, Fannie Mae co-hosted a portion of the event at its offices and paid vendors for event
registration, food and beverage, and other services. We did not make these payments to Georgetown
University or t o Dr. Brummer; had we paid the university, they would have fallen below the NYSE independence
standards’ thresholds of materiality for a director who is a current employee of a company to which Fannie Mae
made, or from which Fannie Mae received, payments.
◦ Dr . Johnson is a professor at MIT, which Fannie Mae has engaged for certain data analysis and training. He is
also a research associate at the National Bureau of Economic Research, a nonprofit organization that facilitates
issue analysis, to which Fannie Mae has paid subscription fees. The payments made by Fannie Mae to each
during the past three years fall below the NYSE independence standards’ thresholds of materiality for a director
who is a current employee of a company to which Fannie Mae made, or from which Fannie Mae received,
payments.
◦ Ms. Kimbrough is employed by LinkedIn Corporation, a subsidiary of Microsoft Corporation. Fannie Mae has
engaged in transactions directly and indirectly with LinkedIn for advertising, recruiting, and educational
programs. Fannie Mae has engaged Microsoft in connection with Office 365 applications and for other
technology services. The payments made by Fannie Mae to Microsoft during the past three years fall below the
NYSE independence standards’ thresholds of materiality for a director who is a current employee of a company
to which Fannie Mae made, or from which Fannie Mae received, payments.
The Board also determined that each member of the Audit Committee, Compensation and Human Capital Committee,
and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee (including Mr. Herz during his 2024 service) met the NYSE’s
independence criteria for members of such committees.
The Board did not consider the Board’s duties to the conservator, together with the federal government’s controlling
beneficial ownership of Fannie Mae, in determining independence of the Board members.

---

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES
Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services
The Audit Committee of our Board of Directors is directly responsible for the appointment, oversight and evaluation of
our independent registered public accounting firm, subject to conservator approval of matters relating to retention and
termination. Deloitte & Touche LLP (Public Company Accounting Oversight Board ID No. 34 ) was our independent
registered public accounting firm for the years ended 2024 and 2023 . Deloitte & Touche LLP has advised the Audit
Committee that they are independent accountants with respect to the company, within the meaning of standards
established by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board and federal securities laws administered by the SEC.
The following table displays the aggregate estimated or actual fees for professional services provided by Deloitte &
Touche LLP, including audit fees.
For the Year Ended
December 31,
Description of fees:
Audit fees
$ 37,325,580
$ 39,099,000
Audit-related fees (1)
348,435
314,800
Tax fees (2)
101,079
20,000
All other fees (3)
543,000
394,000
Total fees
$ 38,318,094
$ 39,827,800
(1) Consists of fees billed for attest-related services on debt offerings and compliance with the covenants in the senior preferred stock
purchase agreement with Treasury.
(2) Consists of tax fees related to non-audit tax consulting and compliance services.
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
Principal Accounting Fees and Services
(3) Consists of fees billed for non -audit engagements, including attestation for the Corporate Responsibility and Impact report and
predecessor report, and other compliance assessments. These services were permissible under the Audit Committee's pre-approval policy
discussed below.
Pre-Approval Policy
In accordance with its charter, the Audit Committee must approve, in advance of the service, all audit and permissible
non-audit services to be provided by our independent registered public accounting firm and establish policies and
procedures for the engagement of the external auditor to provide audit and permissible non-audit services. The
independent registered public accounting firm and management are required to present reports on the nature of the
services provided by the independent registered public accounting firm for the past year and the fees for such services,
categorized into audit services, audit-related services, tax services and other services. The firm may not be retained to
perform the non-audit services specified in Section 10A(g) of the Exchange Act.
The Audit Committee has delegated to its Chair the authority to pre-approve any additional audit and permissible non-
audit services up to $1 million per engagement. The Audit Committee must ratify such pre-approvals at the next
scheduled meeting of the Audit Committee.
In 2024 , we paid no fees to the independent registered public accounting firm pursuant to the de minimis exception
established by the SEC, and all services were pre-approved.
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules
PART IV

---

ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules
Documents filed as part of this report
Consolidated Financial Statements
An index to our consolidated financial statements has been filed as part of this report beginning on page and is
incorporated herein by reference.
Financial Statement Schedules
None.
Exhibits
The table below lists exhibits that are filed with or incorporated by reference into this report.
Item
Description
3.1
Fannie Mae Charter Act (12 U.S.C. § 1716 et seq.) as amended through July 25, 2019 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit
3.1 to Fannie Mae’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2019, filed October 31, 2019)
3.2
Fannie Mae Bylaws, as amended through January 29, 2019 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to Fannie Mae’s Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018, filed February 14, 2019)
4.1
Description of Registrant's Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Fannie Mae’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2023, filed February 15, 2024)
4.2
Certificate of Designation of Terms of Fannie Mae Preferred Stock, Series D (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to
Fannie Mae’s registration statement on Form 10, filed March 31, 2003)
4.3
Certificate of Designation of Terms of Fannie Mae Preferred Stock, Series E (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to
Fannie Mae’s registration statement on Form 10, filed March 31, 2003)
4.4
Certificate of Designation of Terms of Fannie Mae Preferred Stock, Series F (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to
Fannie Mae’s registration statement on Form 10, filed March 31, 2003)
4.5
Certificate of Designation of Terms of Fannie Mae Preferred Stock, Series G (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to
Fannie Mae’s registration statement on Form 10, filed March 31, 2003)
4.6
Certificate of Designation of Terms of Fannie Mae Preferred Stock, Series H (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.5 to
Fannie Mae’s registration statement on Form 10, filed March 31, 2003)
4.7
Certificate of Designation of Terms of Fannie Mae Preferred Stock, Series I (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.6 to
Fannie Mae’s registration statement on Form 10, filed March 31, 2003)
4.8
Certificate of Designation of Terms of Fannie Mae Preferred Stock, Series L (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.7 to
Fannie Mae’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed August 8, 2008)
4.9
Certificate of Designation of Terms of Fannie Mae Preferred Stock, Series M (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.8 to
Fannie Mae’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed August 8, 2008)
4.10
Certificate of Designation of Terms of Fannie Mae Preferred Stock, Series N (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.9 to
Fannie Mae’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed August 8, 2008)
4.11
Certificate of Designation of Terms of Fannie Mae Non-Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock, Series 2004-1 (Incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 4.10 to Fannie Mae’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, filed
February 26, 2010)
4.12
Certificate of Designation of Terms of Fannie Mae Preferred Stock, Series O (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.11 to
Fannie Mae’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, filed February 26, 2010)
4.13
Certificate of Designation of Terms of Fannie Mae Preferred Stock, Series P (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.12 to
Fannie Mae’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012, filed April 2, 2013)
4.14
Certificate of Designation of Terms of Fannie Mae Preferred Stock, Series Q (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.13 to
Fannie Mae’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012, filed April 2, 2013)
4.15
Certificate of Designation of Terms of Fannie Mae Preferred Stock, Series R (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.14 to
Fannie Mae’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012, filed April 2, 2013)
4.16
Certificate of Designation of Terms of Fannie Mae Preferred Stock, Series S (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.15 to
Fannie Mae’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012, filed April 2, 2013)
4.17
Certificate of Designation of Terms of Fannie Mae Preferred Stock, Series T (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to
Fannie Mae’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed May 19, 2008 )
4.18
Fannie Mae Fifth Amended and Restated Certificate of Designation of Terms of Variable Liquidation Preference Senior
Preferred Stock, Series 2008-2, effective as of January 2, 2025
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules
4.19
Federal National Mortgage Association Amended and Restated Warrant to Purchase Common Stock, effective as of January
2, 2025
4.20
Amended and Restated Senior Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of September 26, 2008, between the United
States Department of the Treasury and Federal National Mortgage Association, acting through the Federal Housing Finance
Agency as its duly appointed conservator (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Fannie Mae’s Current Report on
Form 8-K, filed October 2, 2008)
4.21
Amendment to Amended and Restated Senior Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of May 6, 2009, between the
United States Department of the Treasury and Federal National Mortgage Association, acting through the Federal Housing
Finance Agency as its duly appointed conservator (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.21 to Fannie Mae’s Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009, filed May 8, 2009)
4.22
Second Amendment to Amended and Restated Senior Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of December 24,
2009, between the United States Department of the Treasury and Federal National Mortgage Association, acting through the
Federal Housing Finance Agency as its duly appointed conservator (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Fannie Mae’s
Current Report on Form 8-K, filed December 30, 2009)
4.23
Third Amendment to Amended and Restated Senior Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of August 17, 2012,
between the United States Department of the Treasury and Federal National Mortgage Association, acting through the
Federal Housing Finance Agency as its duly appointed conservator (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Fannie Mae’s
Current Report on Form 8-K, filed August 17, 2012)
4.24
Letter Agreement between the United States Department of the Treasury and the Federal National Mortgage Association,
acting through the Federal Housing Finance Agency as its duly appointed conservator, dated December 21, 2017
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Fannie Mae’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed December 22, 2017)
4.25
Letter Agreement between the United States Department of the Treasury and the Federal National Mortgage Association,
acting through the Federal Housing Finance Agency as its duly appointed conservator, dated September 27, 2019
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Fannie Mae’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed October 1, 2019)
4.26
Letter Agreement between the United States Department of the Treasury and the Federal National Mortgage Association,
acting through the Federal Housing Finance Agency as its duly appointed conservator, dated January 14, 2021 (Incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Fannie Mae’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed January 20, 2021)
4.27
Letter Agreement between the United States Department of the Treasury and the Federal National Mortgage Association,
acting through the Federal Housing Finance Agency as its duly appointed conservator, dated September 14, 2021
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Fannie Mae’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed September 20, 2021)
4.28
Letter Agreement between the United States Department of the Treasury and the Federal National Mortgage Association,
acting through the Federal Housing Finance Agency as its conservator, dated January 2, 2025 (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to Fannie Mae’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed January 7, 2025)
10.1
Repayment Provisions for SEC Executive Officers, amended and restated as of March 8, 2012† (Incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.44 to Fannie Mae’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2012, filed May 9, 2012)
10.2
Fannie Mae Form of Indemnification Agreement for directors and officers of Fannie Mae (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.15 to Fannie Mae’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, filed February 26, 2009.)
10.3
Fannie Mae Form of Indemnification Agreement for directors and officers of Fannie Mae (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.2 to Fannie Mae’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016, filed February 17, 2017 )
10.4
Fannie Mae Form of Indemnification Agreement for directors and officers of Fannie Mae (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.3 to Fannie Mae’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018, filed February 14, 2019)
10.5
Fannie Mae Supplemental Retirement Savings Plan, as amended through April 29, 2008† (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.2 to Fannie Mae’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008, filed August 8, 2008)
10.6
Amendment to Fannie Mae Supplemental Retirement Savings Plan, effective October 8, 2008† (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.32 to Fannie Mae’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, filed February 26, 2009)
10.7
Amendment to Fannie Mae Supplemental Retirement Savings Plan, effective May 14, 2010† (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.2 to Fannie Mae’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010, filed August 5, 2010)
10.8
Amendment to Fannie Mae Supplemental Retirement Savings plan for 2012 Executive Compensation Program, adopted May
18, 2012† (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to Fannie Mae’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
June 30, 2012, filed August 8, 2012)
10.9
Amendment to Fannie Mae Supplemental Retirement Savings Plan, effective July 1, 2013† (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.4 to Fannie Mae’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2013, filed November 7,
2013)
10.10
Amendment to Fannie Mae Supplemental Retirement Savings Plan, effective December 31, 2020† (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.11 to Fannie Mae's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020, filed
February 12, 2021)
10.11
Amendment to Fannie Mae Supplemental Retirement Savings Plan, effective January 1, 2023† (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.11 to Fannie Mae’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2022, filed February 14, 2023)
10.12
Amended and Restated Senior Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of September 26, 2008, between the United
States Department of the Treasury and Federal National Mortgage Association, acting through the Federal Housing Finance
Agency as its duly appointed conservator (Incorporated by reference Exhibit 4.1 to Fannie Mae’s Current Report on Form 8-
K, filed October 2, 2008)
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules
10.13
Amendment to Amended and Restated Senior Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of May 6, 2009, between the
United States Department of the Treasury and Federal National Mortgage Association, acting through the Federal Housing
Finance Agency as its duly appointed conservator (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.21 to Fannie Mae’s Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q, filed May 8, 2009)
10.14
Second Amendment to Amended and Restated Senior Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of December 24,
2009, between the United States Department of the Treasury and Federal National Mortgage Association, acting through the
Federal Housing Finance Agency as its duly appointed conservator (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Fannie Mae’s
Current Report on Form 8-K, filed December 30, 2009)
10.15
Third Amendment to Amended and Restated Senior Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of August 17, 2012,
between the United States Department of the Treasury and Federal National Mortgage Association, acting through the
Federal Housing Finance Agency as its duly appointed conservator (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Fannie Mae’s
Current Report on Form 8-K, filed August 17, 2012)
10.16
Letter Agreement between the United States Department of the Treasury and the Federal National Mortgage Association,
acting through the Federal Housing Finance Agency as its duly appointed conservator, dated December 21, 2017
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Fannie Mae’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed December 21, 2017)
10.17
Letter Agreement between the United States Department of the Treasury and the Federal National Mortgage Association,
acting through the Federal Housing Finance Agency as its duly appointed conservator, dated September 27, 2019
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Fannie Mae’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed October 1, 2019)
10.18
Letter Agreement between the United States Department of the Treasury and the Federal National Mortgage Association,
acting through the Federal Housing Finance Agency as its duly appointed conservator, dated January 14, 2021 (Incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Fannie Mae’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed January 20, 2021)
10.19
Letter Agreement between the United States Department of the Treasury and the Federal National Mortgage Association,
acting through the Federal Housing Finance Agency as its duly appointed conservator, dated September 14, 2021
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Fannie Mae’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed September 20, 2021)
10.20
Letter Agreement between the United States Department of the Treasury and the Federal National Mortgage Association,
acting through the Federal Housing Finance Agency as its conservator, dated January 2, 2025 (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to Fannie Mae’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed January 7, 2025)
10.21
Confidentiality and Proprietary Rights Agreement† (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Fannie Mae’s Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2021, filed August 3, 2021)
10.22
Form of Covered Employee Statement Under Confidentiality and Proprietary Rights Agreement† (Incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.20 to Fannie Mae’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021, filed February 15,
2022)
10.23
Form of Covered Employee Statement Under Confidentiality and Proprietary Rights Agreement (first used with 2023
executive compensation)† (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.22 to Fannie Mae’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2022, filed February 14, 2023)
10.24
Form of Relocation Repayment Agreement for Officers of Fannie Mae† (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Fannie
Mae’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2024, filed July 30, 2024)
19.1
Insider Trading Policy ^
31.1
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a)
31.2
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a)
32.1
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
32.2
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
99.1
First Amendment of the Fourth Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement of Common Securitization
Solutions, LLC, effective date February 2, 2024 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to Fannie Mae’s Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2024, filed April 30, 2024)
99.2
Side Letter Agreement between the Federal Housing Finance Agency and the United States Department of the Treasury,
dated January 2, 2025 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to Fannie Mae’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed January
7, 2025)
101. INS
Inline XBRL Instance Document* - the instance document does not appear in the Interactive Data File because its XBRL tags
are embedded within the Inline XBRL document
101. SCH
Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema*
101. CAL
Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation*
101. DEF
Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition*
101. LAB
Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label*
101. PRE
Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation*
Cover Page Interactive Data File (embedded within the Inline XBRL document)
__________
† This Exhibit is a management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.
* The financial information contained in these XBRL documents is unaudited.
^ P ortions of this exhibit have been redacted pursuant to Item 601(a)(6) of Regulation S-K.
Fannie Mae 2024 Form 10-K
Form 10-K Summary