EDGAR 10-K Filing

Company CIK: 1051514
Filing Year: 2025
Filename: 1051514_10-K_2025_0001140361-25-010772.json

---

ITEM 1. BUSINESS
ITEM 1.
BUSINESS
Our Company
Overview
We are a medical technology company in dermatology dedicated to developing, commercializing and marketing innovative products for the treatment of dermatologic conditions. Our products include the XTRAC® and Pharos® excimer lasers and VTRAC® lamp systems utilized in the treatment of psoriasis, vitiligo and various other skin conditions. Our products also include the TheraClear® Acne Therapy System utilized in the treatment of mild to moderate inflammatory, comedonal and pustular acne. The Pharos device is no longer available.
Corporate Overview
We were incorporated in the State of New York in 1989 under the name Electro-Optical Sciences, Inc. and subsequently reincorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware in 1997. In April 2010, we changed our name to MELA Sciences, Inc. In June 2015, we completed the acquisition of the XTRAC® Excimer Laser and the VTRAC® excimer lamp businesses from PhotoMedex, Inc. (the “Acquisition”). Prior to the Acquisition, the Company’s only product was the MelaFind® system, or MelaFind, a device for aiding dermatologists in the evaluation of clinically atypical pigmented skin lesions. On January 5, 2016, we changed our name to STRATA Skin Sciences, Inc., and we have discontinued the MelaFind business.
In August 2021 and January 2022, we acquired the Pharos U.S. dermatology business and the TheraClear acne treatment business, respectively.
Post-COVID-19 Pandemic
Since March 2020, the global pandemic related to a new strain of coronavirus (“COVID-19”) has negatively impacted business conditions in the industry in which we operate, disrupted global supply chains, constrained workforce participation and created significant volatility and disruption of financial markets. The pandemic led to the suspension of elective procedures in the U.S. and to the temporary closure of many physician practices, which are our primary customers. While most offices have reopened, some physician practices closed and never reopened. Accordingly, the COVID-19 pandemic and its variants have negatively impacted our operational and financial performance, including our ability to execute our business strategies and initiatives in the expected time frames and those of our primary customers. It has also negatively impacted our supply chains and transport, customer behavior and staffing.
Impact of Russia-Ukraine War
Prior to the outbreak of the Russia-Ukraine War, Ukraine was the largest exporter of noble gases including neon, krypton, and xenon and has historically been the source of a significant amount of gas supplied to us by our contract suppliers. Neon gas is essential to the proper functioning of our lasers. Our suppliers have been resourceful in continuing to supply gases to us but cannot assure us that the supply will not remain uninterrupted. The reduced supply and ongoing conflict have also impacted the price of gas worldwide. Additionally, the Creating Helpful Incentives to Produce Semiconductors and Science Act of 2022 has led to a further tightening of rare gas supplies as semiconductor chip manufacturers reconfigure their supply chains to address the need to secure their own supplies of rare gases for use in the manufacture of computer chips.
XTRAC and Pharos Systems and VTRAC Systems
The XTRAC and Pharos excimer laser technology emits highly concentrated UV light targeted primarily towards autoimmune dermatological skin disorders such as psoriasis, vitiligo, atopic dermatitis, and eczema, among others. The XTRAC system received U.S. Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) clearance in 2000 and the Pharos system in 2004, and excimer laser has since become a widely recognized treatment for psoriasis, vitiligo and other skin diseases. Psoriasis and vitiligo alone affect up to 13 million people in the U.S. and 195 million people worldwide. VTRAC is a UV light lamp system that works in much the same way as the XTRAC. It received FDA clearance in August 2005 and Conformité Européenne (“CE”) mark approval in January 2006 and has been marketed exclusively in international markets.
Present in natural sunlight, ultraviolet B (“UVB”) is an accepted psoriasis treatment that penetrates the skin to slow the growth of damaged skin cells thereby placing the disease into remission for a period of time. Studies have shown that the remission time can last three to six months or longer. In our XTRAC system, our targeted therapy approach delivers optimum amounts of UVB light directly to skin lesions, sparing healthy tissue. Many peer reviewed studies have proven that the XTRAC excimer laser can clear psoriasis faster and produce longer remissions than other UVB modalities, resulting in fewer treatments to produce the desired result.
We currently market three XTRAC excimer models. In January 2020, we announced the FDA granted clearance for our XTRAC Momentum Excimer Laser System platform. This clearance is the first full platform clearance since 2008. Momentum has an increased power range to improve patient safety and treatment efficiency; a new and exclusive proprietary short-hair tip, providing ease of use in difficult-to-treat scalp psoriasis; and an enhanced user interface and database. In February 2022, we announced the commercial launch of our next generation excimer laser system, XTRAC Momentum® 1.0, which delivers higher power and a faster repetition rate than the current models, along with a new user interface and slim design. We continue to market the XTRAC Velocity, our third-generation laser and the XTRAC Ultra Plus, which is also a highly effective model marketed primarily in certain international markets. The Momentum, Velocity and the Ultra Plus are capable of treating mild, moderate and severe psoriasis, vitiligo, atopic dermatitis and leukoderma.
The XTRAC excimer laser is marketed in the U.S. mainly under a recurring revenue model in which we place the system in the physician’s office for no upfront charge and generate our revenue on a per-use basis (referred to herein as the dermatology recurring procedures model or segment). We estimate that there are over 1,000 XTRAC lasers in use in the U.S., of which 864 systems were, as of December 31, 2024, included in our dermatology recurring procedures revenue model. The Pharos business we acquired in 2021 provides us with the opportunity to convert the Pharos customer base to our XTRAC excimer laser system. The target U.S. audience for XTRAC lasers comprises approximately 3,500 dermatologists who perform disease management. Until 2019, in markets outside the U.S., the XTRAC laser had been marketed primarily as dermatology procedures equipment sales through distributors in over twenty-five countries. The VTRAC is marketed exclusively in international markets through the same distributors.
Since 2019, we have been transitioning our international dermatology procedures equipment sales through our master distributor to a direct distribution model for equipment sales and recurring revenue on a country by country basis. In January 2022, our agreement with our master distributor expired. We have signed distributor contracts by year as follows: 2019 - Korea, 2020 - Japan, 2021 - China, Israel, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Bahrain, UAE, Jordan and Iraq, and 2023 - Mexico and India. We have renewed and/or amended several of these agreements as required to keep their terms current.
Studies have concluded that XTRAC treatment leads to significant improvement in psoriasis plaques and severity scores in as few as six to ten treatments. Treatment protocols recommend that patients receive two treatments per week with a minimum of 48 hours between treatments. Our data shows that treatment with XTRAC excimer lasers has an 89% efficacy rate and produces only minimal side effects. In support of its clinical effect, the XTRAC excimer lasers have been cited in over 45 clinical studies and research programs, with findings published in peer-reviewed medical journals around the world. The XTRAC excimer laser has also been endorsed by the National Psoriasis Foundation, and its use for psoriasis is covered by nearly all major insurance companies, including Medicare. XTRAC treatment is a reimbursable procedure for psoriasis under three Current Procedural Terminology (“CPT”) codes that differ based on the total skin surface area being treated. Insurance Reimbursement to physicians varies based upon insurance company and location. The national CPT code reimbursement established by the Center for Medicaid Services (“CMS”), which forms the basis for most insurance companies’ reimbursement levels, ranges for the three codes between $155 per treatment to $232 per treatment for 2024. Reimbursement is expected to change in 2025. (See “Third Party Reimbursement” below.)
Psoriasis, the Disease
The World Health Organization describes psoriasis as a chronic, noncommunicable, painful, disfiguring and disabling disease for which there is no cure, and which generates a great negative impact on patients’ quality of life. It manifests itself in many forms and typically causes raised, red, scaly patches that appear on the skin and may cause itchiness, burning or stinging. Psoriasis is also associated with other serious health conditions such as diabetes, heart disease and depression.
Psoriasis Treatment Options
There are essentially three main types of psoriasis treatments, as listed below:
Topical therapies: These can include corticosteroids, vitamin D3 derivatives, coal tar, anthralin and retinoids, among others, that are sold as a cream, gel, liquid, spray, or ointment. The efficacy of topical agents varies from person to person, although these products are commonly associated with a loss of potency over time as people develop resistance.
Phototherapy: This is the area in which we operate. Our XTRAC Excimer Systems are FDA-cleared, reimbursed by insurance, and exhibit none of the significant side-effects associated with some alternative therapies.
Systemic medications: There are a number of prescription medications available for psoriasis, which are given either by mouth or as an injection. The popularity and use of these medications are growing significantly, notwithstanding their cost and their potentially severe side-effects.
XTRAC excimer lasers are particularly significant and beneficial for mild to moderate psoriasis patients who prefer a noninvasive treatment approach without the side effects of invasive, systemic agents, or to patients who have developed a resistance to topical agents. In many cases, patients treated with topical or systemic therapies are also candidates for phototherapy.
Using the XTRAC and Pharos Excimer Lasers to Treat Vitiligo and Other Skin Diseases
UV light therapy is considered to be an effective and safe treatment for many skin disorders beyond psoriasis. To this effect, the XTRAC technology is FDA cleared for the treatment of not only psoriasis but also vitiligo (a skin pigment deficiency), atopic dermatitis (eczema) and leukoderma, which is a localized loss of skin pigmentation that occurs after an inflammatory skin condition such as a burn, intralesional steroid injection, or post dermabrasion.
XTRAC technology for vitiligo patients typically requires more therapy sessions than for psoriasis but is dependent on the severity of the disease. In the treatment of vitiligo, we believe the XTRAC functions to reactivate the skin’s melanocytes (the cells that produce melanin), which causes pigment to return. To date, there is not sufficient data to confirm how long patients can expect their vitiligo to be in remission after XTRAC therapy. Based on anecdotal reports, we believe that re-pigmentation may last for several years. Historically, vitiligo treatments had been considered cosmetic procedures by insurance companies, and as such were not reimbursed. However, we estimate that as of December 31, 2024, approximately 56% of insurers consider XTRAC treatments to be medically necessary for the treatment of vitiligo and therefore provide coverage. Recent changes to CPT code descriptions may impact the extent of this coverage in the future.
We believe that several factors have limited the growth of the use of XTRAC treatments for those who suffer from psoriasis and vitiligo. Specifically, we believe that awareness of the positive effects of XTRAC treatments has not been high enough among both sufferers and providers; and that the treatment regimen requiring sometimes up to 12 or more treatments has limited XTRAC use to certain patient populations. Addressing the lack of knowledge issue, we have a direct to patient advertising campaign aimed at motivating psoriasis and vitiligo patients to seek out XTRAC treatments from our physician partners. Specific advertisements encourage prospective patients to contact our patient advocacy center via telephone or web site, wherein we provide information on the treatment and insurance coverage, and ultimately we can schedule an appointment for the prospective patient to be evaluated by a physician within our customer network, convenient to their location, to determine if they would benefit from XTRAC treatments.
STRATAPEN
In January 2017, we entered into an OEM agreement with Esthetic Education, LLC to private label the STRATAPEN device. STRATAPEN® MicroSystems is a micropigmentation device that provides advanced technology offering exceptional results. This contract expired in January 2020, and we continued to sell parts and accessories through June 30, 2024. The Company no longer offers the device or accessories.
TheraClear
In January 2022, we acquired the TheraClear assets from Theravant Corporation. The TheraClear Acne Therapy System delivers a two-part process for treating inflammatory acne, pustular acne and comedonal acne that combines a vacuum and broadband light that has been proven to clear skin rapidly for fast and visible reduction in acne and associated redness. Treatments are very comfortable, take 10 minutes to perform, are highly effective, and can be used on all skin types.
Competition
Our XTRAC product line competes with pharmaceutical compounds and methodologies used to treat an array of skin conditions. Such alternative treatments may be in the form of topical products, systemic medications, and phototherapies from both large pharmaceutical and smaller devices companies. Our major competitors for dermatological solutions include The Daavlin Company, National Biologic Corporation, and pharmaceutical companies producing topical products and systemic and biologic medications. Currently, our XTRAC system is believed to be a competitive therapy to alternative treatments on the basis of its recognized clinical effect, minimal side effect profile, cost-effectiveness and reimbursement.
Our TheraClear device competes with a range of over the counter treatment methodologies, as well as prescription only medications, and in-office treatment methodologies.
Manufacturing
We manufacture our XTRAC products at our 17,000 sq. ft. facility in Carlsbad, California. Our California facility is certified as ISO 13485 compliant. ISO 13485 is an International standardization written by the International Organization for Standardization, which publishes requirements for a comprehensive quality management system for the design and manufacture of medical devices. Certification to the standard is awarded by accredited third parties. We maintain third-party relationships for the manufacture and/or maintenance of our Pharos and TheraClear systems. We believe that our present manufacturing capacity at these facilities is sufficient to meet foreseeable demand for our products.
Research and Development Efforts
Our research and development team, including engineers, consists of two employees. We conduct research and development activities at our facility located in Carlsbad, California. Our research and development efforts are focused on the application of our XTRAC system for the treatment of inflammatory skin disorders.
Intellectual Property
Our policy is to protect our intellectual property by obtaining U.S. and foreign patents to protect technology, inventions and improvements important to the development of our business. As of December 31, 2024, 12 issued U.S. patents are in force or pending and several of these patents have foreign counterparts issued and pending.
We also rely on trade secrets and technical know-how in the manufacture and marketing of our products. We require our employees, consultants and contractors to execute confidentiality agreements with respect to our proprietary information.
We believe that our patented methods and apparatus, together with proprietary trade-secret technology and registered trademarks, give us a competitive advantage; however, whether a patent is infringed or is valid, or whether or not a patent application should be granted, are all complex matters of science and law, and therefore, we cannot be certain that, if challenged, our patented methods and apparatus and/or trade-secret technology would be upheld. If one or more of our patented methods, patented apparatus or trade-secret technology rights, or our trademark rights, are invalidated, rejected or found unenforceable, that could reduce or eliminate any competitive advantage we might otherwise have had.
Government Regulation
Regulations Relating to Products and Manufacturing
Our products and research and development activities are regulated by numerous governmental authorities, principally the FDA and corresponding state and foreign regulatory agencies. Any medical device or cosmetic we manufacture and/or distribute will be subject to pervasive and continuing regulation by the FDA. The U.S. Food, Drug and Cosmetics Act, or FD&C Act, and other federal and state laws and regulations govern the pre-clinical and clinical testing, design, manufacture, use, labeling and promotion of medical devices, including our XTRAC, VTRAC, and TheraClear devices. Product development and approval for medical devices within this regulatory framework takes a number of years and involves the expenditure of substantial resources.
In the U.S., medical devices are classified into three different classes, Class I, II and III, on the basis of controls deemed necessary to provide a reasonable assurance of the safety and effectiveness of the device. Class I devices are subject to general controls, such as facility registration, medical device listing, labeling requirements, premarket notification (unless the medical device has been specifically exempted from this requirement), adherence to the FDA’s Quality System Regulation, and requirements concerning the submission of device-related adverse event reports to the FDA. Class II devices are subject to general and special controls, such as performance standards, premarket notification (510(k) clearance), post-market surveillance, and FDA Quality System Regulations. Generally, Class III devices are those that must receive premarket approval by the FDA to provide a reasonable assurance of their safety and effectiveness, such as life-sustaining, life-supporting and implantable devices, or new devices that have been found not to be substantially equivalent to existing legally marketed devices. Both XTRAC and TheraClear are Class II devices.
With limited exceptions, before a new medical device can be distributed in the U.S., marketing authorization typically must be obtained from the FDA through a premarket notification under Section 510(k) of the FD&C Act, or through a premarket approval application under Section 515 of the FD&C Act. The FDA will typically grant a 510(k) clearance if it can be established that the device is substantially equivalent to a predicate device that is a legally marketed Class I or II device (or to pre-amendments Class III devices for which the FDA has yet to call for premarket approvals). We have received FDA 510(k) clearance to market our XTRAC and VTRAC systems for the treatment of psoriasis, vitiligo, atopic dermatitis and leukoderma. The FDA granted these clearances under Section 510(k) on the basis of substantial equivalence to other technologies that had received prior clearances.
For any devices that are cleared through the 510(k) process, modifications or enhancements that could significantly affect the safety or effectiveness of the device, or that constitute a major change in the intended use of the device, will require a new 510(k) submission. In August 2003 the FDA granted 510(k) clearance for a significantly modified version of our XTRAC laser, which we have marketed as the XTRAC XL Plus Excimer Laser System. In October 2004 the FDA granted clearance for the XTRAC Ultra (AL 8000) Excimer Laser System and, in March 2008 we received 510(k) clearance for the XTRAC Velocity (AL 10000) Excimer Laser System. These approvals were originally granted to PhotoMedex, Inc. and acquired by us in the June 2015 acquisition described above. In January 2020, we announced the FDA granted clearance of our XTRAC Momentum Excimer Laser platform.
The TheraClear device has been cleared by the FDA through the 510(k) process.
We are subject to routine inspection by the FDA and, as noted above, must comply with a number of regulatory requirements applicable to firms that manufacture medical devices and other FDA-regulated products for distribution within the U.S., including requirements related to device labeling (including prohibitions against promoting products for unapproved or off-label uses), facility registration, medical device listing, adherence to the FDA’s Quality System Regulation, good manufacturing processes and requirements for the submission of reports regarding certain device-related adverse events to the FDA.
We are also subject to the radiological health provisions of the FD&C Act and the general and laser-specific radiation safety regulations administered by the Center for Devices and Radiological Health, or CDRH, of the FDA. These regulations require laser manufacturers to file initial, new product, supplemental and annual reports, to maintain quality control, product testing and sales records, to incorporate certain design and operating features (depending on the class of product) in lasers sold to end users pursuant to a performance standard and to certify and appropriately label each laser sold as belonging to one of four classes, based on the level of radiation from the laser that is accessible to users. Moreover, we are obligated to repair, replace, or refund the cost of certain electronic products that are found to fail to comply with applicable federal standards or otherwise are found to be defective. The CDRH is empowered to seek fines and other remedies for violations of the regulatory requirements. To date, we have filed the documentation with the CDRH for our laser products requiring such filing and have not experienced any difficulties or incurred significant costs in complying with such regulations.
We are approved by the European Union to affix the CE mark to our XTRAC laser and VTRAC lamp systems. This certification is a mandatory conformity mark for products placed on the market in the European Economic Area, which is evidence that they meet all European Community, or EC, quality assurance standards and compliance with applicable European medical device directives for the production of medical devices. This will enable us to market our approved products in all of the member countries that accept the CE mark. We also are required to comply with additional individual national requirements that are in addition to those required by these nations. Our products have also met the requirements for marketing in various other countries.
Our TheraClear device is being manufactured for us by a third party, who is subject to the same regulations. We rely on the manufacturer to ensure compliance with the regulations. Failure to comply with applicable regulatory requirements can result in fines, injunctions, civil penalties, recalls or seizures of products, total or partial suspensions of production, refusals by the U.S. and foreign governments to permit product sales and criminal prosecution. We are, or may become, subject to various other federal, state, local and foreign laws, regulations and policies relating to, among other things, safe working conditions, good laboratory practices and the use and disposal of hazardous or potentially hazardous substances used in connection with research and development.
Fraud and Abuse Laws
Because of the significant federal funding involved in Medicare and Medicaid, Congress and the states have enacted, and actively enforce, a number of laws whose purpose is to eliminate fraud and abuse in federal health care programs. Our business is subject to compliance with these laws.
Anti-Kickback Laws
In the U.S., there are federal and state anti-kickback laws that generally prohibit the payment or receipt of kickbacks, bribes or other remuneration in exchange for the referral of patients or other health-related business. The U.S. federal healthcare programs’ Anti-Kickback Statute makes it unlawful for individuals or entities knowingly and willfully to solicit, offer, receive or pay any kickback, bribe or other remuneration, directly or indirectly, in exchange for or to induce the purchase, lease or order, or arranging for or recommending purchasing, leasing, or ordering, any good, facility, service, or item for which payment may be made in whole or in part under a federal healthcare program such as Medicare or Medicaid. The Anti-Kickback Statute covers “any remuneration,” which has been broadly interpreted to include anything of value, including for example gifts, certain discounts, the furnishing of free supplies, equipment or services, credit arrangements, payments of cash and waivers of payments. Several courts have interpreted the statute’s intent requirement to mean that if any one purpose of an arrangement involving remuneration is to induce referrals of federal healthcare covered business, the arrangement can be found to violate the statute. Penalties for violations include criminal penalties and civil sanctions such as fines, imprisonment and possible exclusion from Medicare, Medicaid and other federal healthcare programs. In addition, several courts have permitted kickback cases brought under the Federal False Claims Act to proceed, as discussed in more detail below.
The reach of the Anti-Kickback Statute was broadened by the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 (the “ACA”), which, among other things, amends the intent requirement of the federal Anti-Kickback Statute. Pursuant to the statutory amendment, a person or entity no longer needs to have actual knowledge of this statute or specific intent to violate it in order to have committed a violation. In addition, the ACA provides that the government may assert that a claim including items or services resulting from a violation of the federal Anti-Kickback Statute constitutes a false or fraudulent claim for purposes of the civil False Claims Act (discussed below) or the civil monetary penalties statute, which imposes penalties against any person who is determined to have presented or caused to be presented a claim to a federal health program that the person knows or should know is for an item or service that was not provided as claimed or is false or fraudulent.
Because the Anti-Kickback Statute is broadly written and encompasses many harmless or efficient arrangements, Congress authorized the Office of Inspector General of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, or OIG, to issue a series of regulations, known as “safe harbors.” For example, there are regulatory safe harbors for payments to bona fide employees, properly reported discounts and rebates, and for certain investment interests. Although an arrangement that fits into one or more of these exceptions or safe harbors is immune from prosecution, arrangements that do not fit squarely within an exception or safe harbor do not necessarily violate the statute. The failure of a transaction or arrangement to fit precisely within one or more of the exceptions or safe harbors does not necessarily mean that it is illegal or that prosecution will be pursued. However, conduct and business arrangements that arguably implicate the Anti-Kickback Statute but do not fully satisfy all the elements of an exception or safe harbor may be subject to increased scrutiny by government enforcement authorities such as the OIG.
Many states have laws that implicate anti-kickback restrictions similar to the Anti-Kickback Statute. Some of these state prohibitions apply, regardless of whether federal health care program business is involved, to arrangements such as for self-pay or private-pay patients. Government officials have focused their enforcement efforts on marketing of healthcare services and products, among other activities, and recently have brought cases against companies, and certain sales, marketing and executive personnel, for allegedly offering unlawful inducements to potential or existing customers in an attempt to procure their business.
Federal Civil False Claims Act and State False Claims Laws
The federal civil False Claims Act imposes liability on any person or entity who, among other things, knowingly and willfully presents, or causes to be presented, a false or fraudulent claim for payment by a federal healthcare program, including Medicare and Medicaid. The “qui tam,” or “whistleblower” provisions of the False Claims Act allow a private individual to bring actions on behalf of the federal government alleging that the defendant has submitted a false claim to the federal government, and to share in any monetary recovery. In recent years, the number of suits brought against healthcare providers by private individuals has increased dramatically. Medical device companies, like us, can be held liable under false claims laws, even if they do not submit claims to the government, when they are deemed to have caused submission of false claims by, among other things, providing incorrect coding or billing advice about their products to customers that file claims, or by engaging in kickback arrangements with customers that file claims.
The False Claims Act also has been used to assert liability on the basis of misrepresentations with respect to the services rendered and in connection with alleged off-label promotion of products. Our future activities relating to the manner in which we sell our products and document our prices, such as the reporting of discount and rebate information and other information affecting federal, state and third-party reimbursement of our products, and the sale and marketing of our products, may be subject to scrutiny under these laws.
When an entity is determined to have violated the False Claims Act, it may be required to pay up to three times the actual damages sustained by the government, plus civil penalties of $5,500 to $11,000 for each separate false claim. There are many potential bases for liability under the False Claims Act. A number of states have enacted false claim laws analogous to the federal civil False Claims Act and many of these state laws apply where a claim is submitted to any state or private third-party payer. In this environment, our engagement of physician consultants in product development and product training and education could subject us to similar scrutiny. We are unable to predict whether we would be subject to actions under the False Claims Act or a similar state law, or the impact of such actions. However, the costs of defending such claims, as well as any sanctions imposed, could significantly affect our financial performance.
HIPAA Fraud and Other Regulations
The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, or HIPAA, created a class of federal crimes known as the “federal health care offenses,” including healthcare fraud and false statements relating to healthcare matters. The HIPAA health care fraud statute prohibits, among other things, knowingly and willfully executing, or attempting to execute, a scheme or artifice to defraud any healthcare benefit program, or to obtain by means of false or fraudulent pretenses, any money under the control of any health care benefit program, including private payers. A violation of this statute is a felony and may result in fines, imprisonment and/or exclusion from government-sponsored programs. The HIPAA false statements statute prohibits, among other things, knowingly and willfully falsifying, concealing or covering up a material fact or making any materially false, fictitious or fraudulent statement or representation in connection with the delivery of or payment for healthcare benefits, items or services. A violation of this statute is a felony and may result in fines and/or imprisonment. Entities that are found to have aided or abetted in a violation of the HIPAA federal health care offenses are deemed by statute to have committed the offense and are punishable as a principal.
We are also subject to the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and similar anti-bribery laws applicable in non-U.S. jurisdictions that generally prohibit companies and their intermediaries from making improper payments to non-U.S. government officials for the purpose of obtaining or retaining business. Because of the predominance of government-sponsored healthcare systems around the world, most of our customer relationships outside of the U.S. will be with governmental entities and therefore subject to such anti-bribery laws.
Effective January 1, 2020, the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) became effective. The CCPA provides certain privacy protections for California residents not generally available to citizens of any other state. The law provides California residents with the right to know that their personal data is being collected; know whether that data is being sold or disclosed; to prevent the sale of their personal information; to access their personal data; to request that a business delete their personal information; and to not be discriminated against for exercising these rights.
HIPAA and Other Privacy Regulations
The regulations that implement HIPAA also establish uniform standards governing the conduct of certain electronic healthcare transactions and protecting the security and privacy of individually identifiable health information maintained or transmitted by healthcare providers, health plans and healthcare clearinghouses, which are referred to as “covered entities.” Several regulations have been promulgated under HIPAA’s regulations including: the Standards for Privacy of Individually Identifiable Health Information, or the Privacy Rule, which restricts the use and disclosure of certain individually identifiable health information; the Standards for Electronic Transactions, or the Transactions Rule, which establishes standards for common healthcare transactions, such as claims information, plan eligibility, payment information and the use of electronic signatures; and the Security Standards for the Protection of Electronic Protected Health Information, or the Security Rule, which requires covered entities to implement and maintain certain security measures to safeguard certain electronic health information. Although we do not believe we are a covered entity and therefore are not currently directly subject to these standards, we expect that our customers generally will be covered entities and may ask us to contractually comply with certain aspects of these standards by entering into requisite business associate agreements. While the government intended this legislation to reduce administrative expenses and burdens for the healthcare industry, our compliance with certain provisions of these standards entails significant costs for us.
The Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health, or HITECH, Act has increased civil penalty amounts for violations of HIPAA by either covered entities or business associates up to an annual maximum of $1.5 million for uncorrected violations based on willful neglect. Imposition of these penalties is more likely now because HITECH significantly strengthens enforcement. It requires the Department of Health & Human Services (“HHS”) to conduct periodic audits to confirm compliance and to investigate any violation that involves willful neglect which carries mandatory penalties. Additionally, state attorneys general are authorized to bring civil actions seeking either injunctions or damages in response to violations of HIPAA Privacy and Security Rules that threaten the privacy of state residents.
In addition to federal regulations issued under HIPAA, some states have enacted privacy and security statutes or regulations that, in some cases, are more stringent than those issued under HIPAA. In those cases, it may be necessary to modify our planned operations and procedures to comply with the more stringent state laws. If we fail to comply with applicable state laws and regulations, we could be subject to additional sanctions.
Federal and state consumer protection laws are being applied increasingly by the United States Federal Trade Commission, or FTC, and state attorneys general to regulate the collection, use, storage and disclosure of personal or patient information, through websites or otherwise, and to regulate the presentation of web site content. Courts may also adopt the standards for fair information practices promulgated by the FTC, which concern consumer notice, choice, security and access. Numerous other countries have or are developing laws governing the collection, use, disclosure and transmission of personal or patient information.
HIPAA as well as other federal and state laws apply to our receipt of patient identifiable health information in connection with research and clinical trials. We collaborate with other individuals and entities in conducting research and all involved parties must comply with applicable laws. Therefore, the compliance of the physicians, hospitals or other providers or entities with whom we collaborate also impacts our business.
Third-Party Reimbursement
Our ability to market our phototherapy products successfully depends in large part on the extent to which various third parties are willing to reimburse patients or providers for the cost of medical procedures utilizing our treatment products. These third parties include government authorities, private health insurers and other organizations, such as health maintenance organizations. Third-party payers are systematically challenging the prices charged for medical products and services. They may deny reimbursement if they determine that a prescribed device is not used in accordance with cost-effective treatment methods as determined by the payer, or is experimental, unnecessary or inappropriate. Accordingly, if less costly drugs or other treatments are available, third-party payers may not authorize, or may limit, reimbursement for the use of our products, even if our products are safer or more effective than the alternatives. Additionally, they may require changes to our pricing structure and revenue model before authorizing reimbursement.
Reimbursement systems in international markets vary significantly by country and by region within some countries, and reimbursement approvals must be obtained on a country-by-country basis. Many international markets have government-managed healthcare systems that control reimbursement for new devices and procedures. In most markets, there are private insurance systems, as well as government-managed systems. Our XTRAC products remain substantially without approval for reimbursement in many international markets under either government or private reimbursement systems. To date, patients of the TheraClear products have had limited success in obtaining third party reimbursement for such treatments.
Many private plans key their reimbursement rates to rates set by the CMS under three distinct CPT codes based on the total skin surface area being treated.
As of December 31, 2024, the national rates were as follows:
•
96920 - designated for: the total area less than 250 square centimeters. CMS assigned a 2024 national payment of $155 per treatment;
•
96921 - designated for: the total area 250 to 500 square centimeters. CMS assigned a 2024 national payment of $170 per treatment; and
•
96922 - designated for: the total area over 500 square centimeters. CMS assigned a 2024 national payment of $232 per treatment.
As of November 1, 2024, CMS has advised that its updated 2025 reimbursement rates will be as follows:
•
96920 - designated for: the total area less than 250 square centimeters. CMS assigned a 2025 national payment of $135 per treatment;
•
96921 - designated for: the total area 250 to 500 square centimeters. CMS assigned a 2025 national payment of $145 per treatment; and
•
96922 - designated for: the total area over 500 square centimeters. CMS assigned a 2025 national payment of $183 per treatment.
The national rates are adjusted by overhead factors applicable to each state.
Employees
As of December 31, 2024, we had 106 full-time employees, which consisted of three executive officers, three vice presidents, 37 sales and marketing staff, 28 people engaged in manufacturing of lasers, 16 customer-field service personnel, two engaged in research and development and 17 finance and administration staff.
Customers
Domestically, our XTRAC customers consist of dermatologists and dermatological group clinics who partner with us primarily in our dermatology procedures recurring revenue model. As of December 31, 2024, we have 864 partner clinics throughout the United States. Internationally, we have been transitioning our international dermatology procedures equipment sales through our master distributor to a direct distribution model for equipment sales and recurring revenue on a country by country basis. We have signed distributor contracts by year as follows: 2019 - Korea, 2020 - Japan, 2021 - China, Israel, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Bahrain, UAE, Jordan and Iraq, and 2023 - Mexico and India. We have renewed and/or amended several of these agreements as required to keep their terms current.
Available Information
We file annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy statements and other information with the Commission. These filings are available to the public on the Internet at the Commission’s website at http://www.sec.gov.
Our Internet address is http://www.strataskinsciences.com (this website address is not intended to function as a hyperlink and the information contained on our website is not intended to be a part of this Annual Report). We make available free of charge on https://strataskinsciencesinc.gcs-web.com/sec-filings our annual, quarterly and current reports, and amendments to those reports, as soon as reasonably practical after we electronically file such material with, or furnish it to, the Commission. We may from time to time provide important disclosures to investors by posting them in the Investor Relations section of our website, as allowed by the Commission’s rules. The information on the website listed above is not and should not be considered part of this Annual Report and is intended to be an inactive textual reference only.

---

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
ITEM 1A.
RISK FACTORS
In addition to the other information contained in this Annual Report and the exhibits hereto, the following risk factors should be considered carefully in evaluating our business. Our business, financial condition, cash flows or results of operations could be materially adversely affected by any of these risks. Additional risks not presently known to us or that we currently deem immaterial may also adversely affect our business, financial condition, cash flows or results of operations. The following discussion of risk factors contains forward-looking statements as discussed on page 1. Our business routinely encounters and addresses risks, some of which may cause our future results to be different - sometimes materially different - than we presently anticipate.
Risk Factor Summary
Risks Relating to Our Business Operations
•
We have incurred losses for a number of years and anticipate that we will incur continued losses for the foreseeable future.
•
Public health epidemics or pandemics may affect our ability to develop, market and sell our products, disrupt regulatory activities or have other adverse effects on our business and operations.
•
We may not be able to maintain an uninterrupted supply of the gases used to power our lasers, as the Russia-Ukraine War has disrupted supplies of rare gases.
•
We may not be able to successfully integrate newly acquired businesses, joint ventures and other partnerships into our operations or achieve expected profitability from our acquisitions.
•
Our laser treatments of psoriasis, vitiligo, atopic dermatitis and leukoderma and/or any of our future products or services may fail to gain market acceptance or be impacted by competitive products, services or therapies which could adversely affect our competitive position.
•
The success of our products depends on third-party reimbursement of patients' costs, which could result in potentially reduced prices or reduced demand and adversely affect our revenues and business operations.
•
Any failure in our customer education efforts could have a material adverse effect on our revenue and cash flow.
•
If revenue from significant distributors declines, we may have difficulty replacing the lost revenue, which would negatively affect our results and operations.
•
If we fail to manage our sales and marketing force or to market and distribute our products effectively, we may experience diminished revenues and profits.
•
We are reliant on a limited number of suppliers for production of our products.
•
Our indebtedness could materially adversely affect our financial condition and our ability to operate our business, react to changes in the economy or industry or pay our debts and meet our obligations under our debt and could divert our cash flow from operations for debt payments.
•
If our actual liability for state sales and use taxes is higher than our accrued liability, it could have a material impact on our financial condition.
•
We must comply with complex statutes prohibiting fraud and abuse, and both we and physicians utilizing our products could be subject to significant penalties for noncompliance.
•
We may be subject, directly or indirectly, to federal and state healthcare fraud and abuse laws and regulations and could face substantial penalties if we are unable to fully comply with such laws.
•
If the effectiveness and safety of our devices are not supported by long-term data, and the level of acceptance of our products by dermatologists does not increase or is not maintained, our revenues could decline.
•
Our failure to obtain or maintain necessary FDA clearances and approvals, or to maintain continued clearances, or equivalents thereof in the U.S. and relevant foreign markets, could hurt our ability to distribute and market our products, and our products are subject to recall by such agencies.
•
If required, clinical trials necessary to support a 510(k) notice or PMA application, for new or modified products, will be expensive and will require the enrollment of large numbers of patients, and suitable patients may be difficult to identify and recruit.
•
Healthcare policy changes may have a material adverse effect on us.
•
Our market acceptance in international markets requires regulatory approvals from foreign governments and may depend on third party reimbursement of participants’ cost.
•
We face substantial competition, which may result in others discovering, developing or commercializing products more successfully than us.
•
We actively employ social media as part of our marketing strategy, which could give rise to regulatory violations, liability, breaches of data security or reputational damage.
•
Social media companies on which we rely for advertising may change their policies limiting our ability to reach our target markets.
•
We may become subject to claims of infringement or misappropriation of the intellectual property rights of others, which could prohibit us from shipping affected products, require us to obtain licenses from third parties or to develop non-infringing alternatives, and subject us to substantial monetary damages and injunctive relief. Our patents may also be subject to challenge on validity grounds, and our patent applications may be rejected.
•
If we or our third-party manufacturers or suppliers fail to comply with the FDA’s Quality System Regulation or any applicable state equivalent, our manufacturing operations could be interrupted and our potential product sales and operating results could suffer.
•
If any of our medical products cause or contribute to a death or a serious injury, or malfunction in certain ways, we will be subject to medical device reporting regulations, which can result in voluntary corrective actions or agency enforcement actions.
•
We may have a need for additional funds in the future and there is no guarantee that we will be able to generate those funds from our business, and if we do not have enough capital to fund operations, then we will have to cut costs or raise funds.
•
We may be subject to disruptions or failures in our information technology systems and network infrastructures, including through cyber-attacks or other third-party breaches that could have a material adverse effect on our business.
•
Environmental and health safety laws may result in liabilities, expenses and restrictions on our operations.
Risks Relating to Our Common Stock
•
Our shares of common stock could be delisted from the Nasdaq Capital Market which could result in, among other things, a decline in the price of our common stock and less liquidity for holders of shares of our common stock.
•
Your percentage ownership will be further diluted in the future.
•
Our stock price may be volatile, meaning purchasers of our common stock could incur substantial losses.
•
Our charter documents and Delaware law may inhibit a takeover that stockholders consider favorable and could also limit the market price of our stock.
Risks Relating to Our Business Operations
We have incurred losses for a number of years and anticipate that we will incur continued losses for the near future.
Since 2015, we have devoted substantially all of our resources in the commercialization and sales of the XTRAC products. Our net loss for the year ended December 31, 2024 was approximately $10.1 million, and as of December 31, 2024, we had an accumulated deficit of approximately $248.1 million. Our losses, among other things, have had and may continue to have an adverse effect on the adequacy of our capitalization and cash flow.
Public health epidemics or pandemics may affect our ability to develop, market and sell our products, disrupt regulatory activities or have other adverse effects on our business and operations. In addition, public health epidemics or pandemics may adversely impact economies worldwide, which could result in adverse effects on our business, operations and prospects.
Our business and operations could be adversely affected by public health epidemics or pandemics, including the recent COVID-19 pandemic, impacting the markets and industries in which we and our collaborators operate. We and our partners have faced and may in the future face disruptions that affect our ability to operate due to various factors, including:
•
the ability to source raw materials and supplies;
•
a general decline in business activity;
•
the destabilization of the markets and negative impacts on the healthcare system globally, which could negatively impact our ability to market and sell our products, including through the disruption of health care activities in general and elective health care procedures in particular, the inability of our sales team to contact and/or visit doctors in person, patients’ interest in starting or continuing procedures involving our products and our ability to support patients that presently use our products; and
•
difficulty accessing the capital and credit markets on favorable terms, or at all, and a severe disruption and instability in the global financial markets, or deteriorations in credit and financing conditions which could affect our access to capital necessary to fund business operations.
Further, the Biden Administration ended the public health emergency declarations related to the COVID-19 pandemic in May 2023 and the FDA ended a number of COVID-related policies. The FDA has retained a number of COVID-19-related policies but with appropriate changes, as applicable. Additionally, the Trump Administration has issued a number of Executive Orders related to global health issues. It is unclear how, if at all, these policies will impact our efforts to develop and commercialize our products.
We may in the future face impediments or delays to regulatory meetings and approvals due to any pandemic measures. We cannot be certain what the overall impact of such pandemics will be on our business, although for the reasons described above such pandemics have the potential to adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.
We may not be able to maintain an uninterrupted supply of the gases used to power our lasers, as the Russia-Ukraine War has disrupted supplies of rare gases.
Prior to the outbreak of the Russia-Ukraine War, Ukraine was the world’s largest exporter of noble gases including neon, krypton and xenon. Historically, Ukraine has been the source of a significant amount of gas supplied to the Company by our contract suppliers. Neon gas is essential to the proper functioning of our lasers. Our suppliers have been resourceful in continuing to supply gases to us but cannot assure us that the supply will remain uninterrupted. The reduced supply and war have also impacted the price of gas worldwide. Additionally, the Creating Helpful Incentives to Produce Semiconductors and Science Act of 2022 has led to a further tightening of rare gas supplies as chip manufacturers reconfigure their supply chains to address the need to secure their own supplies of rare gases for use in the manufacture of computer chips, while struggling with the disruption caused by this war.
We may acquire other assets or businesses, or form collaborations or make investments in other companies or technologies that could harm our operating results, dilute our stockholders’ ownership, increase our debt or cause us to incur significant expense.
As part of our business strategy, we may pursue acquisitions of assets, including preclinical, clinical or commercial stage products or product candidates, or businesses, or strategic alliances and collaborations, to expand our existing technologies and operations. We may not identify or complete these transactions in a timely manner, on a cost-effective basis, or at all, and we may not realize the anticipated benefits of any such transaction, any of which could have a detrimental effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. We have limited experience with acquiring other companies, products or product candidates, and limited experience with forming strategic alliances and collaborations. We may not be able to find suitable acquisition candidates, and if we make any acquisitions, we may not be able to integrate these acquisitions successfully into our existing business and we may incur additional debt or assume unknown or contingent liabilities in connection therewith. Integration of an acquired company or assets may also disrupt ongoing operations, require the hiring of additional personnel and the implementation of additional internal systems and infrastructure, especially the acquisition of commercial assets, and require management resources that would otherwise focus on developing our existing business. We may not be able to find suitable strategic alliances or collaboration partners or identify other investment opportunities, and we may experience losses related to any such investments.
To finance any acquisitions or collaborations, we may choose to issue debt or equity securities as consideration. Any such issuance of shares would dilute the ownership of our stockholders. If the price of our common stock is low or volatile, we may not be able to acquire other assets or companies or fund a transaction using our stock as consideration. Alternatively, it may be necessary for us to raise additional funds for acquisitions through public or private financings, and such additional funds may not be available on terms that are favorable to us, or at all.
We may not be able to successfully integrate newly acquired businesses, joint ventures and other partnerships into our operations or achieve expected profitability from our acquisitions.
If we cannot successfully integrate acquisitions (including the Pharos and TheraClear businesses), joint ventures and other partnerships on a timely basis, we may be unable to generate sufficient revenue to offset acquisition costs, we may incur costs in excess of what we anticipate, and our expectations of future results of operations, including certain cost savings and synergies, may not be achieved. Acquisitions involve substantial risks, including:
•
unforeseen difficulties in integrating operations, technologies, services, accounting and personnel;
•
diversion of financial and management resources from existing operations;
•
unforeseen difficulties related to entering geographic regions where we do not have prior experience;
•
risks relating to obtaining sufficient equity or debt financing; and
•
potential loss of customers.
In addition, if we finance acquisitions by issuing equity securities or securities convertible into equity securities, our existing stockholders’ interests would be diluted, which, in turn, could adversely impact the market price of our stock. Moreover, we could finance an acquisition with debt, resulting in higher leverage and interest costs and could increase losses and losses per share which could impact the price of our stock.
Our laser treatments of psoriasis, vitiligo, atopic dermatitis and leukoderma and/or any of our future products or services may fail to gain market acceptance or be impacted by competitive products, services or therapies which could adversely affect our competitive position.
We have generated limited worldwide commercial distribution for our products. In the United States, our XTRAC systems are placed at physician offices at no upfront charge to the physician and we are generally paid on a per-usage method where we retain ownership of the system. We cannot assure you that our products and services will find sufficient acceptance in the marketplace under our sales strategies.
We also face a risk that other companies in the market for dermatological products and services may be able to provide dermatologists a higher overall financial return and therefore compromise our ability to increase our installed base of users and ensure they engage in optimal usage of our products. If, for example, such other companies have products or medical devices that require less time commitment from the dermatologist and yield an attractive return on a dermatologist’s time and investment, we may find that our efforts to increase our base of users are hindered.
We also face a risk that the overall cost of systemic or biologic medications or treatment modalities become less expensive through the development of generics or other means. We may be faced with pressure to reduce our costs to be competitive which may negatively impact our business. In addition, our business could be negatively impacted if these medications are prescribed for less severe cases of the diseases or if new, more effective or less expensive medications are developed.
Whether a treatment may be delegated to non-physician staff members and, if so, to whom and to what extent, are matters that may vary state by state, as these matters are within the province of the state medical boards. In states that may be more restrictive in such delegation, a physician may decline to adopt the XTRAC system into his or her practice, deeming it to be fraught with too many constraints and finding other outlets for the physician’s time and staff’s time to be more remunerative. There can be no assurance that we will be successful in persuading such medical boards that a liberal standard for delegation is appropriate for the XTRAC system, based on its design for ease and safety of use. If we are not successful, we may find that even if a geographic region has wide insurance reimbursement, the region’s physicians may decline to adopt the XTRAC system into their practices.
We therefore cannot assure you that the marketplace will be receptive to our excimer laser technology over competing products, services and therapies or that a cure will not be found for the underlying diseases we are focused on treating. Failure of our products to achieve market acceptance could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
In addition, while this introduction is specifically for those patients that might not be able to avail themselves of in-office treatments, it may be viewed by our partner clinics as a channel conflict and cause a deterioration in our relationships with our current partners or negatively impact our ability to grow the number of partner clinics.
The success of our products depends on third-party reimbursement of patients' costs, which could result in potentially reduced prices or reduced demand and adversely affect our revenues and business operations.
Our ability to market our products successfully, especially XTRAC treatments, depends in large part on the extent to which various third parties are willing to reimburse patients or providers for the costs of medical procedures utilizing such products. These third parties include government authorities, private health insurers and other organizations, such as health maintenance organizations, whose patterns of reimbursement may change as a result of new standards for reimbursement determined by these third parties or because of the programs and policies enacted under the ACA.
Third-party payers are systematically challenging the prices charged for medical products and services. They may deny reimbursement if they determine that a prescribed device is not used in accordance with cost-effective treatment methods as determined by the payer, or is experimental, unnecessary or inappropriate. Further, although third parties may approve reimbursement, such approvals may be under terms and conditions that discourage use of the XTRAC system. Accordingly, if less costly drugs or other treatments are available, third-party payers may not authorize or may limit reimbursement for the use of our products, even if our products are safer or more effective than the alternatives.
In addition, medical insurance policies and treatment coverage have been and may be affected by the parameters of the ACA or successor policies enacted by the current or any new administration. While the ACA’s stated purpose is to expand access to coverage, it also mandates certain requirements regarding the types and limitations of insurance coverage. There can be no guarantee that the changes in coverage under the ACA will not affect the type and level of reimbursement for our products.
CPT codes for all procedures are subject to continued reevaluation. Should CMS reduce reimbursement for the CPT codes for XTRAC treatment or raise reimbursement for competitive products, we may see a decline in our recurring revenue business as well as a decline in new XTRAC installations.
Although we have received reimbursement approvals from a majority of private healthcare plans for the XTRAC system, we cannot give assurance that these private plans will continue to adopt or maintain favorable reimbursement policies or accept the XTRAC system in its clinical role as a second-line therapy in the treatment of psoriasis. Additionally, third-party payers may require further clinical studies or changes to our pricing structure and revenue model before authorizing or continuing reimbursement.
As of December 31, 2024, based on published coverage policies and payment practices of private and Medicare insurance plans, we estimate that approximately 85% of the insured population in the U.S. is covered by insurance coverage or payment policies that reimburse physicians for using the XTRAC system for treatment of psoriasis. We can give no assurance that health insurers will not adversely modify their reimbursement policies for the use of the XTRAC system in the future.
Currently, there is little insurance reimbursement coverage for acne treatments, such as those provided by TheraClear. In order for TheraClear to be successful, patients and decision makers will need to be able to pay for treatments without insurance reimbursement.
The continuing development of our products depends upon our developing and maintaining strong working relationships with physicians.
The research, development, marketing and sale of our current products and any potential new and improved products or future product indications for which we receive regulatory clearance or approval depend upon our maintaining working relationships with physicians. We rely on these professionals to provide us with considerable knowledge and experience regarding the development, marketing and sale of our products. Physicians assist us as researchers, marketing and product consultants and public speakers. If we cannot maintain our strong working relationships with these professionals and continue to receive their advice and input, the development and marketing of our products could suffer, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations. At the same time, companies in the medical device industry are under increasing scrutiny by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General, or OIG, and the U.S. Department of Justice, or DOJ, for improper relationships with physicians. Our failure to comply with requirements governing the industry’s relationships with physicians, including the reporting of certain payments to physicians under the National Physician Payment Transparency Program (Open Payments) or an investigation into our compliance by the OIG or the DOJ, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Any failure in our customer education efforts could have a material adverse effect on our revenue and cash flow.
It is important to the success of our marketing efforts to educate physicians and technicians how to properly use our products. We rely on physicians to spend their time and money to participate in our pre-installation educational sessions. Moreover, if physicians and technicians use our products improperly, they may have unsatisfactory patient outcomes or, in the case of the XTRAC system, cause patient injury, which may give rise to negative publicity or lawsuits against us, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our reputation, revenues and profitability.
If revenue from significant distributors declines, we may have difficulty replacing the lost revenue, which would negatively affect our results and operations.
We depend on several key distributors for a material portion of our sales, especially in our international business. While we no longer rely upon a single master distributor for our international sales, we now rely upon several in-country distributors in connection with this business. If, for example, a distributor finds that the financial incentives underlying the distributor relationship are no longer attractive, we may need to reduce our margins in order to continue the relationship or identify a new distributor, which could take a significant amount of time. This could have a significant negative effect on our results and our operations, including, but not limited to, failing to comply with a financial covenant in our credit facility with MidCap Financial Trust (“MidCap”).
If we fail to manage our sales and marketing force or to market and distribute our products effectively, we may experience diminished revenues and profits.
There are significant risks involved in managing our sales and marketing force and marketing our products, including our ability:
•
to hire, as needed, a sufficient number of qualified sales and marketing personnel with the aptitude, skills and understanding to market our products;
•
to adequately train our sales and marketing force in the use and benefits of all our products and services, thereby making them more effective promoters;
•
to manage our sales and marketing force and our ancillary channels (e.g., telesales) such that variable and semi-fixed expenses grow at a lesser rate than our revenues; and
•
to set the prices and other terms and conditions for treatments using the XTRAC system in a complex legal environment so that treatments will be accepted as attractive skin health and appropriate alternatives to conventional modalities and treatments.
To increase acceptance and utilization of our products, we may expand our sales and marketing programs in the U.S. While we may be able to draw on currently available personnel within our organization to meet this need, we also expect that we will have to increase the number of representatives devoted to the sales and marketing programs and to broaden, through such representatives, the talents we have at our disposal. In some cases, we may look outside our organization for assistance in marketing our products.
We are reliant on a limited number of suppliers for production of our products.
Production of our products requires specific component parts obtained from our suppliers. While we believe that we could find alternate suppliers, in the event that our current suppliers fail to meet our needs, a change in suppliers or any significant delay in our ability to have access to such resources could have a material adverse effect on our delivery schedules, business, operating results and financial condition. Moreover, in the event we can no longer utilize this supplier or acquire this resource and must identify a new supplier or substitute a different resource, such change may trigger an obligation for us to comply with additional FDA regulatory requirements including, but not limited to, premarketing authorization and Quality System Requirements (“QSR”).
Our indebtedness could materially adversely affect our financial condition and our ability to operate our business, react to changes in the economy or industry or pay our debts and meet our obligations and could divert our cash flow from operations for debt payments.
In September 2021, we entered into a credit and security agreement with MidCap, which was amended in January 2022, September 2022 and June 2023. On February 20, 2024, we amended the credit and security agreement to, among other things, revise the applicable minimum net revenue threshold financial covenant and on March 27, 2024, we further amended the credit and security agreement (as amended to date, the “Senior Term Facility”) to clarify certain provisions related to the maintenance of cash collateral accounts. See “Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Liquidity and Capital Resources” for discussion included in Item 7 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. In addition, subject to restrictions in the agreements governing our credit facilities, we may incur additional debt.
Our indebtedness could have negative consequences, including the following:
•
it may be difficult for us to satisfy our obligations, including debt service requirements under our outstanding debt, resulting in possible defaults on and acceleration of such indebtedness;
•
our ability to obtain additional financing for working capital, capital expenditures, debt service requirements, acquisitions or other general corporate purposes may be impaired;
•
a substantial portion of cash flow from operations may be dedicated to the payment of principal and interest on our debt, therefore reducing our ability to use our cash flow to fund our operations, capital expenditures, future business opportunities, acquisitions and other purposes;
•
we are more vulnerable to economic downturns and adverse industry conditions and our flexibility to plan for, or react to, changes in our business or industry is more limited;
•
our ability to capitalize on business opportunities and to react to competitive pressures, as compared to our competitors, may be compromised due to our high level of debt; and
•
our ability to borrow additional funds or to refinance debt may be limited.
Furthermore, all of our debt under the Senior Term Facility bears interest at variable rates. If these rates increase, our debt service obligations will increase even though the amount borrowed remains the same, and our net income and cash flows, including cash available for servicing our indebtedness, correspondingly decrease. Accordingly, our ability to borrow additional funds may be reduced and risks related to our indebtedness would intensify. Each quarter-point increase in the variable interest rates would increase interest expense on our current variable rate debt by approximately $38,000 during 2025.
If our actual liability for state sales and use taxes is higher than our accrued liability, it could have a material impact on our financial condition.
Included in accrued state sales and use taxes are certain known and estimated sales and use taxes and related penalties and interest to taxing authorities. In our recurring revenue model, we place the XTRAC system in the physician’s office under an arrangement for no upfront charge and generate our revenue on a per-use basis.
In the ordinary course of business, we are, from time to time, subject to audits performed by state taxing authorities. These actions and proceedings are generally based on the state’s position that the arrangements entered into by us are subject to state sales and use tax rather than exempt from applicable law. The states of New York and California have assessed us an aggregate of $5.2 million including penalties and interest. The audits cover the period from March 2014 through November 2022. We received notification that an administrative state judge in New York issued an opinion finding in favor of us that the sale of XTRAC treatment codes was not taxable as sales tax with respect to that state’s first assessment. This ruling covers $1.8 million of the total $5.2 million of assessments. The relevant taxing authority filed an appeal of the administrative law judge’s finding and, following the submission of legal briefs by both sides and oral argument held in January 2022, on May 6, 2022, we received a written decision from the State of New York Appeals Tribunal (“Tribunal”) overturning the favorable sales tax determination of the administrative law judge. We appealed the Tribunal’s decision to the New York State Appellate Division (“Appellate Division”), and posted the required appellate bond in the form of cash collateral. Oral argument was held by the Appellate Division on January 18, 2024.
On March 8, 2024, we received a decision from the Appellate Division ruling against us in the matter of our sales tax appeal, affirming the Tribunal's ruling that our sale of XTRAC treatment codes is subject to sales tax. The Appellate Division concluded that, through the usage arrangements, our customers had possession of the laser devices and had a license and ability to use the laser devices. The Appellate Division also agreed with the Tribunal that the primary function analysis was not applicable in this matter. On April 11, 2024, we filed a motion for leave to appeal the Appellate Division’s decision to the New York State Court of Appeals (“Court of Appeals”). On October 22, 2024, in an unsigned one-line decision, the Court of Appeals denied our motion to appeal the Appellate Division ruling. Therefore, the adverse decision stands and New York will execute on the appellate bond we posted for $1.3 million. As of December 31, 2024, we have accrued $1.8 million including penalties and interest as a result of the Appellate Division ruling. We are in the administrative process of appeal with respect to the remaining $1.3 million of assessments in the State of New York. We believe that the Appellate Division ruling provides an avenue for challenging the pending audit periods and subsequent periods, provided we can show that the value of the equipment provided to customers is either incidental to the overall value of the non-taxable services that are provided or should be treated similarly to pharmaceutical treatments, which are generally exempt from sales tax.
The State of California has made aggregate assessments of $2.1 million including penalties and interest. The audits cover the period from June 2018 through June 2022. We are in the administrative appeal process in this jurisdiction as well. In those states where we did not or may not prevail in the future with the defenses we have proposed and in the event there is a determination that the true object of the delivery of phototherapy under the recurring revenue model is a sale or lease of property and it is not a prescription medication, or we do not have other defenses where we prevail, we may be subject to state sales taxes in those particular states for previous years and in the future, plus interest and penalties for failure to pay such taxes. If it was determined that our recurring revenue model was not exempt from sales taxes in all states where we do business, and taxes and penalties were imposed in each of those states for the entire period through the expiration of each state’s statute of limitations, state sales and use tax, penalties and interest for such period would have a material negative impact on our financial condition and cash flow.
As of December 31, 2024 and 2023, we have estimated our sales and use tax liability to be approximately $6.4 million and $4.3 million, respectively, which includes $1.8 million at December 31, 2024 that was accrued as a result of the Appellate Division ruling. We believe our sales and use tax accruals have properly recognized that if our arrangements with customers are deemed more likely than not that we would not be exempt from sales tax in a particular state are the basis for measurement of the state sales and use tax is calculated in accordance with ASC 405, Liabilities, as a transaction tax. While we believe we have strong positions that our recurring revenue is exempt from sales tax, if it is found that we are subject to sales tax in those particular states where we believe it is more likely than not that we would be exempt from sales tax, then potential tax liabilities including interest and penalties would be higher than accrued amounts. The precise scope, timing and time period at issue, as well as the final outcome of any audit and actual settlements, remain uncertain.
Our failure to respond to rapid changes in technology and other applications in the medical devices industry or the development of a cure for skin conditions treated by our products could make our treatment system obsolete.
The medical device industry is subject to rapid and substantial technological development and product innovations. To be successful, we must respond to new developments in technology, new applications of existing technology and new treatment methods. Our financial condition and operating results could be adversely affected if we fail to be responsive on a timely and effective basis to competitors’ new devices, applications, treatments or price strategies. For example, the development of a cure for psoriasis, vitiligo, atopic dermatitis or leukoderma would eliminate the need for our XTRAC system for these diseases and would require us to focus on other uses of our technology, which could have a material adverse effect on our business and prospects.
As we develop new products or improve our existing products, we may accelerate the economic obsolescence of the existing, unimproved products and their components. The obsolete products and related components may have little to no resale value, leading to an increase in the reserves we have against our inventory. Likewise, there is a risk that the new products or improved existing products may not achieve market acceptance and therefore may also lead to an increase in the reserves against our inventory.
Our customers, or physicians and technicians, as the case may be, may misuse certain of our products, and product liability lawsuits and other damages imposed on us may exceed our insurance coverage, or we may be subject to claims that are not covered by insurance.
We face an inherent risk of product liability as a result of the marketing and sale of our products. For example, we may be sued if our products cause or are perceived to cause injury or are found to be otherwise unsuitable during manufacturing, marketing or sale. Any such product liability claim may include allegations of defects in manufacturing, defects in design, a failure to warn of dangers inherent in the product, negligence, strict liability or breach of warranty. Our products are highly complex, and some are used to treat delicate skin conditions on and near a patient’s face. In addition, the clinical testing, manufacturing, marketing and use of certain of our products and procedures may also expose us to product liability, FDA regulatory and/or legal actions, or other claims. If a physician elects to apply an off-label use and the use leads to injury, we may be involved in costly litigation. In addition, the fact that we train technicians whom we do not supervise in the use of our XTRAC system during patient treatment may expose us to third-party claims if we are accused of providing inadequate training. We may also be subject to claims against us even if the apparent injury is due to the actions of others or the pre-existing health of the patient. For example, we rely on physicians in connection with the use of our products on patients. If these physicians are not properly trained or are negligent, the capabilities and safety features of our products may be diminished or the patient may suffer critical injury. We may also be subject to claims that are caused by the actions of our suppliers, such as those who provide us with components and sub-assemblies.
We presently maintain liability insurance with coverage limits of at least $5.0 million per occurrence and overall aggregate, which we believe is an adequate level of product liability insurance, but product liability insurance is expensive and we might not be able to obtain product liability insurance in the future on acceptable terms or in sufficient amounts to protect us, if at all. Our insurance policy contains various exclusions, and we may be subject to a product liability claim for which we have no coverage. A successful claim brought against us in excess of our insurance coverage could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. Even successful defense would require significant financial and management resources. In addition, continuing insurance coverage may also not be available at an acceptable cost, if at all. Therefore, we may not be able to obtain insurance coverage that will be adequate to satisfy a liability that may arise. Regardless of merit or eventual outcome, product liability claims may result in decreased demand for a product, harm to our reputation, withdrawal of clinical trial volunteers, initiation of investigations by regulators, costs to defend the related litigation, diversion of management’s time and our resources, monetary awards to trial participants or patients, product recalls, withdrawals or labeling, marketing or promotional restrictions, exhaustion of any available insurance and our capital resources, a resulting decline in the price of our common stock and loss of revenues. As a result, regardless of whether we are insured, a product liability claim or product recall may result in losses that could result in the FDA taking legal or regulatory enforcement action against us and/or our products including recall, and could have a material adverse effect upon our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We must comply with complex statutes prohibiting fraud and abuse, and both we and physicians utilizing our products could be subject to significant penalties for noncompliance.
There are extensive federal and state laws and regulations prohibiting fraud and abuse in the healthcare industry that can result in significant criminal and civil penalties. These federal laws include:
•
the anti-kickback statute which prohibits certain business practices and relationships, including the payment or receipt of remuneration for the referral of patients whose care will be paid by Medicare or other federal healthcare programs, as modified by the ACA;
•
the physician self-referral prohibition, commonly referred to as the Stark Law;
•
the anti-inducement law, which prohibits providers from offering anything to a Medicare or Medicaid beneficiary to induce that beneficiary to use items or services covered by either program; the Civil False Claims Act, which prohibits any person from knowingly presenting or causing to be presented false or fraudulent claims for payment by the federal government, including the Medicare and Medicaid programs; and
•
the Civil Monetary Penalties Law, which authorizes HHS to impose civil penalties administratively for fraudulent or abusive acts. Sanctions for violating these federal laws include criminal and civil penalties that range from punitive sanctions, damage assessments, monetary penalties, and imprisonment, denial of Medicare and Medicaid payments, or exclusion from the Medicare and Medicaid programs, or both.
As federal and state budget pressures continue, federal and state administrative agencies may also continue to escalate investigation and enforcement efforts to root out waste and to control fraud and abuse in governmental healthcare programs. Private enforcement of healthcare fraud has also increased, due in large part to amendments to the Civil False Claims Act in 1986 that were designed to encourage private persons to sue on behalf of the government. A violation of any of these federal and state fraud and abuse laws and regulations could have a material adverse effect on our liquidity and financial condition. An investigation into the use of our products by physicians may dissuade physicians from either purchasing or using our products and could have a material adverse effect on our revenues.
We may be subject, directly or indirectly, to federal and state healthcare fraud and abuse laws and regulations and could face substantial penalties if we are unable to fully comply with such laws.
While we do not control referrals of healthcare services or bill directly to Medicare, Medicaid or other third-party payers, many healthcare laws and regulations apply to our business. For example, we could be subject to healthcare fraud and abuse and patient privacy regulation and enforcement by both the federal government and the states in which we conduct our business. The healthcare laws and regulations that may affect our ability to operate include:
•
the federal healthcare programs’ anti-kickback laws, as modified by the ACA, which prohibits, among other things, persons or entities from soliciting, receiving, offering or providing remuneration, directly or indirectly, in return for or to induce either the referral of an individual for, or the purchase order or recommendation of, any item or service for which payment may be made under a federal healthcare program such as the Medicare and Medicaid programs;
•
federal false claims laws which prohibit, among other things, individuals or entities from knowingly presenting, or causing to be presented, claims for payment from Medicare, Medicaid, or other third-party payers that are false or fraudulent, or are for items or services not provided as claimed and which may apply to entities like us to the extent that our interactions with customers may affect their billing or coding practices;
•
HIPAA, which established new federal crimes for knowingly and willfully executing a scheme to defraud any healthcare benefit program or making false statements in connection with the delivery of or payment for healthcare benefits, items or services, as well as leading to regulations imposing certain requirements relating to the privacy, security and transmission of individually identifiable health information; and
•
state law equivalents of each of the above federal laws, such as anti-kickback and false claims laws which may apply to items or services reimbursed by any third-party payer, including commercial insurers, and state laws governing the privacy of health information in certain circumstances, many of which differ from each other in significant ways and often are not preempted by HIPAA, thus complicating compliance efforts.
The medical device industry has been under heightened scrutiny as the subject of government investigations and regulatory or legal enforcement actions involving manufacturers who allegedly offered unlawful inducements to potential or existing customers in an attempt to procure their business, including arrangements with physician consultants. If our operations or arrangements are found to be in violation of any of the laws described above or any other governmental regulations that apply to us, we may be subject to penalties, including civil and criminal penalties, damages, fines, exclusion from the Medicare and Medicaid programs and the curtailment or restructuring of our operations. Any penalties, damages, fines, exclusions, curtailment or restructuring of our operations could adversely affect our ability to operate our business and our financial results. The risk of us being found in violation of these laws is increased by the fact that many of these laws are broad and their provisions are open to a variety of interpretations. Any action against us for violation of these laws, even if we successfully defend against that action and the underlying alleged violations, could cause us to incur significant legal expenses and divert our management’s attention from the operation of our business. If the physicians or other providers or entities with whom we do business are found to be non-compliant with applicable laws, they may be subject to sanctions, which could also have a negative impact on our business.
If the effectiveness and safety of our devices are not supported by long-term data, and the level of acceptance of our products by dermatologists does not increase or is not maintained, our revenues could decline.
Our products may not be accepted in the market if we do not produce clinical data supported by the independent efforts of clinicians. We received clearance from the FDA for the use of the XTRAC system to treat psoriasis based upon our study of a limited number of patients. Safety and efficacy data presented to the FDA for the XTRAC system was based on studies on these patients. For the treatment of vitiligo, atopic dermatitis and leukoderma, we have received clearance from the FDA for the use of the XTRAC system based primarily on a showing of substantial equivalence to other previously cleared predicate devices. However, we may discover that physicians will expect clinical data on such treatments with the XTRAC system. We also may find that data from longer-term psoriasis patient follow-up studies may be inconsistent with those indicated by our relatively short-term data. If longer-term patient studies or clinical experience indicate that treatment with the XTRAC system does not provide patients with sustained benefits or that treatment with our product is less effective or less safe than our current data suggests, our revenues could decline. In addition, the FDA could then bring legal or regulatory enforcement actions against us and/or our products including, but not limited to, recalls or requirements for premarket 510(k) authorizations. We can give no assurance that our data will be substantiated in studies involving more patients. In such a case, we may never achieve significant revenues or profitability.
Our failure to obtain or maintain necessary FDA clearances and approvals, or to maintain continued clearances, or equivalents thereof in the U.S. and relevant foreign markets, could hurt our ability to distribute and market our products.
In both our U.S. and foreign markets, we are affected by extensive laws, governmental regulations, administrative determinations, court decisions and similar constraints. Such laws, regulations and other constraints may exist at the federal, state or local levels in the U.S. and at analogous levels of government in foreign jurisdictions. In addition, the formulation, manufacturing, packaging, labeling, distribution, importation, sale and storage of our products are subject to extensive regulation by various federal agencies, including, but not limited to, the FDA and the FTC, State Attorneys General in the U.S., as well as by various other federal, state, local and international regulatory authorities in the countries in which our products are manufactured, distributed or sold. If we or our manufacturers fail to comply with those regulations, we could become subject to significant penalties or claims, which could harm our results of operations or our ability to conduct our business. In addition, the adoption of new regulations or changes in the interpretations of existing regulations may result in significant compliance costs or discontinuation of product sales and may impair the marketing of our products, resulting in significant loss of net sales. Our failure to comply with federal or state regulations, or with regulations in foreign markets that cover our product claims and advertising, including direct claims and advertising by us, may result in enforcement actions and imposition of penalties or otherwise harm the distribution and sale of our products. Further, our businesses are subject to laws governing our accounting, tax and import and export activities. Failure to comply with these requirements could result in legal and/or financial consequences that might adversely affect our sales and profitability. Each medical device that we wish to market in the U.S. must first receive either 510(k) clearance or Pre Market Approval (“PMA”), which is a stricter regulatory standard than 510(k), from the FDA unless an exemption applies. Either process can be lengthy and expensive. The FDA’s 510(k) clearance process may take from three to 12 months, or longer, and may or may not require human clinical data. The PMA process is much more costly and lengthy. It may take from 11 months to three years, or even longer, and will likely require significant supporting human clinical data. Delays in obtaining regulatory clearance or approval could adversely affect our revenues and profitability. Although we have obtained 510(k) clearances for our XTRAC system for use in treating psoriasis, vitiligo, atopic dermatitis and leukoderma, these approvals and clearances may be subject to revocation if post-marketing data demonstrates safety issues or lack of effectiveness.
Many medical devices, such as medical lasers, are also regulated by the FDA as “electronic products.” In general, manufacturers and marketers of “electronic products” are subject to certain FDA regulatory requirements intended to ensure the radiological safety of the products. These requirements include, but are not limited to, filing certain reports with the FDA about the products and defects/safety issues related to the products as well as complying with radiological performance standards.
The medical device industry is now experiencing greater scrutiny and regulation by federal, state and foreign governmental authorities. Companies in our industry are subject to more frequent and more intensive reviews and investigations, often involving the marketing, business practices, and product quality management. Such reviews and investigations may result in civil and criminal proceedings; the imposition of substantial fines and penalties; the receipt of warning letters, untitled letters, demands for recalls or the seizure of our products; the requirement to enter into corporate integrity agreements, stipulated judgments or other administrative remedies, and result in our incurring substantial unanticipated costs and the diversion of key personnel and management’s attention from their regular duties, any of which may have an adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and liquidity, and may result in greater and continuing governmental scrutiny of our business in the future.
Additionally, federal, state and foreign governments and entities have enacted laws and issued regulations and other standards requiring increased visibility and transparency of our interactions with healthcare providers. For example, the U.S. Physician Payment Sunshine Act, now known as Open Payments, requires us to report to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, or CMS, payments and other transfers of value to all U.S. physicians and U.S. teaching hospitals, with the reported information made publicly available on a searchable website. Effective January 2022 we are also required to collect and report information on payments or transfers of value to physician assistants, nurse practitioners, clinical nurse specialists, certified registered nurse anesthetists and certified nurse-midwives. Failure to comply with these legal and regulatory requirements could impact our business, and we have had and will continue to spend substantial time and financial resources to develop and implement enhanced structures, policies, systems and processes to comply with these legal and regulatory requirements, which may also impact our business and which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
International regulatory approval processes may take more or less time than the FDA clearance or approval process. If we fail to comply with applicable FDA and comparable non-U.S. regulatory requirements, we may not receive regulatory clearances or approvals or may be subject to FDA or comparable non-U.S. enforcement actions. We may be unable to obtain future regulatory clearance or approval in a timely manner, or at all, especially if existing regulations are changed or new regulations are adopted. For example, the FDA clearance or approval process can take longer than anticipated due to requests for additional clinical data and changes in regulatory requirements. A failure or delay in obtaining necessary regulatory clearances or approvals would materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Further, more stringent regulatory requirements or safety and quality standards may be issued in the future with an adverse effect on our business. We have ceased manufacturing and marketing MelaFind but must still maintain records for FDA and foreign regulatory purposes.
If required, clinical trials necessary to support a 510(k) notice or PMA application, for new or modified products, will be expensive and will require the enrollment of large numbers of patients, and suitable patients may be difficult to identify and recruit. Delays or failures in our clinical trials will prevent us from commercializing any modified or new products and will adversely affect our business, operating results and prospects.
Initiating and completing clinical trials necessary to support a 510(k) notice or a PMA application will be time-consuming and expensive and the outcome uncertain. Moreover, the results of early clinical trials are not necessarily predictive of future results, and any product we advance into clinical trials may not have favorable results in early or later clinical trials.
Conducting successful clinical studies will require the enrollment of large numbers of patients, and suitable patients may be difficult to identify and recruit. Patient enrollment in clinical trials and completion of patient participation and follow-up depend on many factors, including the size of the patient population, the nature of the trial protocol, the attractiveness of, or the discomforts and risks associated with, the treatments received by patients enrolled as subjects, the availability of appropriate clinical trial investigators, support staff, and proximity of patients to clinical sites and ability to comply with the eligibility and exclusion criteria for participation in the clinical trial and patient compliance. For example, patients may be discouraged from enrolling in our clinical trials if the trial protocol requires them to undergo extensive post-treatment procedures or follow-up to assess the safety and effectiveness of our products or if they determine that the treatments received under the trial protocols are not attractive or involve unacceptable risks or discomforts. Patients may also not participate in our clinical trials if they choose to participate in contemporaneous clinical trials of competitive products. In addition, patients participating in clinical trials may die before completion of the trial or suffer adverse medical events unrelated to investigational products.
Development of sufficient and appropriate clinical protocols to demonstrate safety and efficacy may be required and we may not adequately develop such protocols to support clearance and approval. Further, the FDA may require us to submit data on a greater number of patients than we originally anticipated and/or for a longer follow-up period or change the data collection requirements or data analysis for any clinical trials. Delays in patient enrollment or failure of patients to continue to participate in a clinical trial may cause an increase in costs and delays in the approval and attempted commercialization of our products or result in the failure of the clinical trial. The FDA may not consider our data adequate to demonstrate safety and efficacy. Such increased costs and delays or failures could adversely affect our business, operating results and prospects.
Our medical device operations are subject to FDA regulatory requirements.
Medical devices regulated by the FDA are subject to “general controls” which include: registration with the FDA; listing commercially distributed products with the FDA; complying with good manufacturing practices under the quality system regulations; filing reports with the FDA and keeping records relative to certain types of adverse events associated with devices under the medical device reporting regulation; assuring that device labeling complies with device labeling requirements; reporting certain device field removals and corrections to the FDA; and obtaining premarket notification 510(k) clearance for devices prior to marketing. Some devices known as “510(k)-exempt” can be marketed without prior marketing clearance or approval from the FDA. In addition to the “general controls,” some Class II medical devices are also subject to “special controls,” including adherence to a particular guidance document and compliance with the performance standard. Instead of obtaining 510(k) clearance, some Class III devices are subject to PMA. In general, obtaining PMA to achieve marketing authorization from the FDA is a more onerous process than seeking 510(k) clearance.
Many medical devices, such as medical lasers, are also regulated by the FDA as “electronic products.” In general, manufacturers and marketers of “electronic products” are subject to certain FDA regulatory requirements intended to ensure the radiological safety of the products. These requirements include, but are not limited to, filing certain reports with the FDA about the products and defects/safety issues related to the products as well as complying with radiological performance standards.
The medical device industry is now experiencing greater scrutiny and regulation by federal, state and foreign governmental authorities. Companies in our industry are subject to more frequent and more intensive reviews and investigations, often involving the marketing, business practices, and product quality management including standards for device recalls and product labeling. Such reviews and investigations may result in civil and criminal proceedings; the imposition of substantial fines and penalties; the receipt of warning letters, untitled letters, demands for recalls or the seizure of our products; the requirement to enter into corporate integrity agreements, stipulated judgments or other administrative remedies, and result in our incurring substantial unanticipated costs and the diversion of key personnel and management’s attention from their regular duties, any of which may have an adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and liquidity, and may result in greater and continuing governmental scrutiny of our business in the future.
We must also have the appropriate FDA clearances and/or approvals from other governmental entities in order to lawfully market devices and/or drugs. The FDA, federal, state or foreign governments and agencies may disagree that we have such clearance and/or approvals for all of our products and may take action to prevent the marketing and sale of such devices until such disagreements have been resolved.
Additionally, federal, state and foreign governments and entities have enacted laws and issued regulations and other standards requiring increased visibility and transparency of our interactions with healthcare providers. For example, the U.S. Physician Payment Sunshine Act requires us to disclose payments and other transfers of value to all U.S. physicians and U.S. teaching hospitals at the U.S. federal level made. Failure to comply with these legal and regulatory requirements could impact our business, and we have had and will continue to spend substantial time and financial resources to develop and implement enhanced structures, policies, systems and processes to comply with these legal and regulatory requirements, which may also impact our business.
Healthcare policy changes may have a material adverse effect on us.
Healthcare costs have risen significantly over the past decade. As a result, there have been and continue to be proposals by federal, state and foreign governments and regulators as well as third-party insurance providers to limit the growth of these costs. Among these proposals are regulations that could impose limitations on the prices we will be able to charge for our products, the amounts of reimbursement available for our products from governmental agencies or third-party payers, requirements regarding the usage of comparative studies, technology assessments and healthcare delivery structure reforms to determine the effectiveness and select the products and therapies used for treatment of patients. While we believe our products provide favorable clinical outcomes, value and cost efficiency, the resources necessary to demonstrate this value to our customers, patients, payers, and regulators is significant and may require longer periods of time and effort in which to obtain acceptance of our products. There is no assurance that our efforts will be successful, and these limitations could have a material adverse effect on our financial position and results of operations.
These changes and additional proposed changes in the future could adversely affect the demand for our products as well as the way in which we conduct our business. For example, the ACA was enacted into law in the U.S. in March 2010. It imposed on medical device manufacturers, a requirement to research into the effectiveness of treatment modalities and institute changes to the reimbursement and payment systems for patient treatments. In addition, governments and regulatory agencies continue to study and propose changes to the laws governing the clearance or approval, manufacture and marketing of medical devices, which could adversely affect our business and results of operations.
FDA regulations and guidance are often revised or reinterpreted by the FDA in ways that may significantly affect our business and our products. The FDA is currently exploring ways to modify its 510(k) clearance process. In addition, due to changes at the FDA in general, it has become increasingly more difficult to obtain 510(k) clearance as data requirements have increased. It is impossible to predict whether legislative changes will be enacted or FDA regulations, guidance or interpretations changed, and what the impact of such changes, if any, may be. However, any changes could make it more difficult for us to maintain or attain clearance or approval to develop and commercialize our products and technologies.
Various healthcare reform proposals have also emerged at the state level. We cannot predict what healthcare initiatives, if any, will be implemented at the federal or state level, or the effect any future legislation or regulation will have on us. Furthermore, an expansion in government’s role in the U.S. healthcare industry may lower reimbursements for our products, reduce medical procedure volumes and adversely affect our business, possibly materially. In addition, if the excise taxes contained in the House or Senate health reform bills are enacted into law, our loss from continuing operations resulting from such an excise tax and results of operations would be materially and adversely affected.
Our market acceptance in international markets requires regulatory approvals from foreign governments and may depend on third party reimbursement of participants’ cost.
We have introduced our XTRAC and VTRAC products into markets in more than 30 countries in Europe, the Middle East, Asia, Australia, South Africa and parts of Central and South America through distributors. We cannot be certain that our salesforce and distributor network will be successful in marketing our products in these or other countries or that our distributors will purchase XTRAC or VTRAC systems beyond their current contractual obligations or in accordance with our expectations. Our TheraClear device has historically been sold in several foreign countries and is subject to similar international regulatory approval requirements.
Even if we obtain and maintain the necessary foreign regulatory registrations or approvals, market acceptance of our products in international markets may be dependent, in part, upon the availability of reimbursement within applicable healthcare payment systems. Reimbursement and healthcare payment systems in international markets vary significantly by country, and include both government-sponsored healthcare and private insurance. We may seek international reimbursement approvals for our products, but we cannot assure you that any such approvals will be obtained in a timely manner, if at all. Failure to receive international reimbursement approvals in any given market could have a material adverse effect on the acceptance or growth of our products in that market or others.
We face substantial competition, which may result in others discovering, developing or commercializing products more successfully than us.
The medical device industry is intensely competitive and subject to rapid and significant technological change. Many of our competitors have significantly greater financial, technical and human resources. Smaller and early-stage companies may also prove to be significant competitors, particularly through collaborative arrangements with large and established companies.
Our competitors in medical device or pharmaceutical industries may also develop products that are more effective, more convenient, more widely used, less costly, or have a better safety profile than our products and these competitors may also be more successful than us in manufacturing and marketing their products.
Our competitors also compete with us in recruiting and retaining qualified scientific, management and commercial personnel, as well as in acquiring technologies complementary to, or necessary for, our programs. Competition for these people in the medical device industry is intense and we may face challenges in retaining and recruiting such individuals if, for example, other companies may provide more generous compensation and benefits, more diverse opportunities, and better chances for career advancement than we do. Some of these advantages may be more appealing to high-quality candidates and employees than those we have to offer. In addition, the decline in our stock price has created additional challenges by reducing the retention value of our equity awards. Because of the complex and technical nature of our systems and the dynamic market in which we compete, any failure to attract and retain a sufficient number of qualified employees could materially harm our ability to develop and commercialize our technology, which would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Consolidation in the medical device industry could have an adverse effect on our revenue and results of operations.
Many medical device industry companies are consolidating to create new companies with greater market power. As the medical device industry consolidates, competition to provide goods and services to industry participants will become more intense. These industry participants may try to use their market power to bundle the sale of more products to our customers in return for lower prices. If we reduce our prices because of consolidation in the healthcare industry, our revenue would decrease and our earnings, financial condition, or cash flows would suffer, which would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
We actively employ social media as part of our marketing strategy, which could give rise to regulatory violations, liability, breaches of data security or reputational damage.
Despite our efforts to monitor evolving social media communication guidelines and comply with applicable rules, there is risk that the use of social media by us, our employees or our customers to communicate about our products or business may cause us to be found in violation of applicable requirements, including requirements of regulatory bodies such as the FDA and FTC. For example, promotional communications and endorsements on social media that, among other things, promote our products for uses or in patient populations that are not described in the product’s approved labeling (known as “off-label uses”), do not contain a fair balance of information about risks associated with using our products, make comparative or other claims about our products that are not supported by sufficient evidence, and/or do not contain required disclosures could result in enforcement actions against us. In addition, adverse events, product complaints, off-label usage by physicians, unapproved marketing or other unintended messages posted on social media could require an active response from us, which may not be completed in a timely manner and could result in regulatory action by a governing body. Further, our employees may knowingly or inadvertently make use of social media in ways that may not comply with our corporate policies or other legal or contractual requirements, which may give rise to liability, lead to the loss of trade secrets or other intellectual property, or result in public exposure of personal information of our employees, clinical trial patients, customers and others. Furthermore, negative posts or comments about us or our products in social media could seriously damage our reputation, brand image and goodwill, which would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Social media companies on which we rely for advertising may change their policies limiting our ability to reach our target markets.
We rely on social media companies, such as Facebook and X (formerly Twitter), to reach our target markets. Facebook has announced that, beginning in January 2022, it will limit the ability of advertisers to target certain markets. Any restrictions by Facebook or any other social media platform on which we depend to reach our target market could have a significant impact on our ability to develop customer awareness and generate new users for our physician partners.
We may become subject to claims of infringement or misappropriation of the intellectual property rights of others, which could prohibit us from shipping affected products, require us to obtain licenses from third parties or to develop non-infringing alternatives, and subject us to substantial monetary damages and injunctive relief. Our patents may also be subject to challenge on validity grounds, and our patent applications may be rejected.
Third parties could, in the future, assert infringement or misappropriation claims against us with respect to our current or future products. Whether a product infringes a patent involves complex legal and factual issues, the determination of which is often uncertain. Therefore, we cannot be certain that we have not infringed the intellectual property rights of such third parties. Our potential competitors may assert that some aspect of our products infringes their patents. There also may be existing patents of which we are unaware that one or more components of our products may inadvertently infringe.
Any infringement or misappropriation claim could cause us to incur significant costs, could place significant strain on our financial resources, divert management’s attention from our business and harm our reputation. If the relevant patents were upheld as valid and enforceable and we were found to infringe, we could be prohibited from selling our product unless we could obtain licenses to use the technology covered by the patent or are able to design around the patent. We may be unable to obtain a license on terms acceptable to us, if at all, and we may not be able to redesign the affected product to avoid infringement.
A court could order us to pay compensatory damages for such infringement, plus prejudgment interest and could, in addition, treble the compensatory damages and award attorney fees. These damages could be substantial and could harm our reputation, business, financial condition and operating results. A court also could enter orders that temporarily, preliminarily or permanently enjoin us and our customers from making, using, selling, offering to sell or importing our products, and/or could enter an order mandating that we undertake certain remedial activities. Depending on the nature of the relief ordered by the court, we could become liable for additional damages to third parties.
We rely on our patents, patent applications and other intellectual property rights to give us a competitive advantage. Whether a patent is valid, or whether a patent application should be granted, is a complex matter of science and law. Therefore, we cannot be certain that, if challenged, our patents, patent applications and/or other intellectual property rights would be upheld. If one or more of those patents, patent applications and other intellectual property rights are invalidated, rejected or found unenforceable, those outcomes could reduce or eliminate any competitive advantage we might otherwise have had.
If we or our third-party manufacturers or suppliers fail to comply with the FDA’s Quality System Regulation or any applicable state equivalent, our manufacturing operations could be interrupted and our potential product sales and operating results could suffer.
We and some of our third-party manufacturers and suppliers are required to comply with some or all of the FDA’s Good Manufacturing Practices or its QSR, which delineates the design controls, document controls, purchasing controls, identification and traceability, production and process controls, acceptance activities, nonconforming product requirements, corrective and preventive action requirements, labeling and packaging controls, handling, storage, distribution and installation requirements, records requirements, servicing requirements, and statistical techniques potentially applicable to the production of our medical devices. We and our manufacturers and suppliers are also subject to the regulations of foreign jurisdictions regarding the manufacturing process if we market our products overseas. The FDA enforces the QSR through periodic and announced or unannounced inspections of manufacturing facilities. Our facilities have been inspected by the FDA and other regulatory authorities, and we anticipate that we and certain of our third-party manufacturers and suppliers will be subject to additional future inspections. If our facilities or those of our manufacturers or suppliers are found to be in non-compliance or fail to take satisfactory corrective action in response to adverse QSR inspectional findings, the FDA could take legal or regulatory enforcement actions against us and/or our products, including but not limited to the cessation of sales or the recall of distributed products, which could impair our ability to produce our products in a cost-effective and timely manner in order to meet our customers’ demands. We may also be required to bear other costs or take other actions that may have a negative impact on our future sales and our ability to generate profits.
Current regulations depend heavily on administrative interpretation. If the FDA does not believe that we are in substantial compliance with applicable FDA regulations, the agency could take legal or regulatory enforcement actions against us and/or our products. We are also subject to periodic inspections by the FDA, other governmental regulatory agencies, as well as certain third-party regulatory groups. Future interpretations made by the FDA or other regulatory bodies made during the course of these inspections may vary from current interpretations and may adversely affect our business and prospects. The FDA’s and foreign regulatory agencies’ statutes, regulations, or policies may change, and additional government regulation or statutes may be enacted, which could increase post-approval regulatory requirements, or delay, suspend, prevent marketing of any cleared/approved products or necessitate the recall of distributed products. We cannot predict the likelihood, nature or extent of adverse governmental regulation that might arise from future legislative or administrative action, either in the U.S. or abroad.
The medical device industry has been under heightened FDA scrutiny as the subject of government investigations and enforcement actions. If our operations and activities are found to be in violation of any FDA laws or any other governmental regulations that apply to us, we may be subject to penalties, including civil and criminal penalties, damages, fines and other legal and/or agency enforcement actions. Any penalties, damages, fines, or curtailment or restructuring of our operations or activities could adversely affect our ability to operate our business and our financial results. The risk of us being found in violation of FDA laws is increased by the fact that many of these laws are broad and their provisions are open to a variety of interpretations. Any action against us for violation of these laws, even if we successfully defend ourselves against that action and its underlying allegations, could cause us to incur significant legal expenses and divert management’s attention from the operation of our business. Where there is a dispute with a federal or state governmental agency that cannot be resolved to the mutual satisfaction of all relevant parties, we may determine that the costs, both real and contingent, are not justified by the commercial returns to us from maintaining the dispute or the product.
Various claims, design features or performance characteristics of our medical devices, that we regarded as permitted by the FDA without marketing clearance or approval, may be challenged by the FDA or state regulators. The FDA or state regulatory authorities may find that certain claims, design features or performance characteristics, in order to be made or included in the products, may have to be supported by further studies and marketing clearances or approvals, which could be lengthy, costly and possibly unobtainable.
If we fail to comply with ongoing regulatory requirements, or if we experience unanticipated problems with products, these products could be subject to restrictions or withdrawal from the market.
We are also subject to similar state requirements and licenses. Failure by us to comply with statutes and regulations administered by the FDA and other regulatory bodies, discovery of previously unknown problems with our products (including unanticipated adverse events or adverse events of unanticipated severity or frequency), manufacturing problems, or failure to comply with regulatory requirements, or failure to adequately respond to any FDA observations concerning these issues, could result in, among other things, any of the following actions:
•
warning letters or untitled letters issued by the FDA;
•
fines, civil penalties, injunctions and criminal prosecution;
•
unanticipated expenditures to address or defend such actions;
•
delays in clearing or approving, or refusal to clear or approve, our products;
•
withdrawal or suspension of clearance or approval of our products by the FDA or other regulatory bodies;
•
product recall or seizure;
•
orders for physician or customer notification or device repair, replacement or refund;
•
interruption of production; and
•
operating restrictions.
If any of these actions were to occur, it would harm our reputation and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our medical products may in the future be subject to product recalls that could harm our reputation, business and financial results.
The FDA has the authority to require the recall of commercialized medical device products in the event of material deficiencies or defects in design or manufacture. In the case of the FDA, the authority to require a recall must be based on an FDA finding that there is a reasonable probability that the device would cause serious injury or death. Manufacturers may, under their own initiative, recall a product if any material deficiency in a device is found. A government-mandated or voluntary recall by us or one of our distributors could occur as a result of component failures, manufacturing errors, design or labeling defects or other deficiencies and issues. Recalls of any of our products would divert managerial and financial resources and have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. The FDA requires that certain classifications of recalls be reported to the FDA within ten working days after the recall is initiated. Companies are required to maintain certain records of recalls, even if they are not reportable to the FDA. We may initiate voluntary recalls involving our products in the future that we determine do not require notification of the FDA. If the FDA disagrees with our determinations, they could require us to report those actions as recalls. A future recall announcement could harm our reputation with customers and negatively affect sales. In addition, the FDA could take enforcement action for failing to report the recalls when they were conducted.
If any of our medical products cause or contribute to a death or a serious injury, or malfunction in certain ways, we will be subject to medical device reporting regulations, which can result in voluntary corrective actions or agency enforcement actions.
Under the FDA medical device reporting regulations, medical device manufacturers are required to report to the FDA information that a device has or may have caused or contributed to a death or serious injury or has malfunctioned in a way that would likely cause or contribute to death or serious injury if the malfunction of the device or one of our similar devices were to recur. If we fail to report these events to the FDA within the required timeframes, or at all, the FDA could take enforcement action against us. Any such adverse event involving our products also could result in future voluntary corrective actions, such as recalls or customer notifications, or agency action, such as inspection or enforcement action. Any corrective action, whether voluntary or involuntary, as well as defending ourselves in a lawsuit, will require our time and capital, distract management from operating our business, and may harm our reputation and financial results.
We may have a need for additional funds in the future and there is no guarantee that we will be able to generate those funds from our business.
Our existing cash position and ability to borrow funds and future revenue may not be sufficient to support the expenses of our operations in the near term. We plan to fund operations by the recurring revenue generated by the use of the XTRAC lasers and the TheraClear Acne Therapy System in the U.S. and international markets, as well as domestic and international sales of our products. If revenues from the sale and use of our existing products are inadequate to fund our operations, we may need to raise additional financing. We cannot assure you that we will be able to raise additional capital or secure alternate financing to fund operations, if necessary, or that we will be able to raise additional capital under terms that are favorable to us. Further, we cannot assure that an acquisition will in any way negate or mitigate our need for future capital. Any additional financing may dilute the ownership interest of our existing stockholders and could adversely affect the market price of our common stock.
If we do not have enough capital to fund operations, then we will have to cut costs or raise funds.
If we are unable to raise additional funds, if necessary, under terms acceptable to us and in the interests of our stockholders, then we will have to take measures to cut operating costs or obtain funds using alternative methods, such as:
•
sell or license some of our technologies that we would not otherwise sell or license if we were in a stronger financial position;
•
sell or license some of our technologies under terms that are less favorable than they otherwise might have been if we were in a stronger financial position; and
•
consider further business combination transactions with other companies or positioning ourselves to be acquired by another company.
If it became necessary to take one or more of the above-listed actions, then our perceived valuation may be lower, which could impact the market price of our stock. Further, the effects on our operations, financial performance and stock price may be significant if we do not or cannot take one or more of the above-listed actions in a timely manner and when needed, and our ability to do so may be limited significantly due to the instability of the global financial markets and the resulting limitations on available financing to us and to potential licensees, buyers and investors. Additionally, these options may not be available to us as all of our assets have been pledged as security for the various financings.
We may be subject to disruptions or failures in our information technology systems and network infrastructures, including through cyber-attacks or other third-party breaches that could have a material adverse effect on our business.
We rely on efficient and uninterrupted operation of complex information technology systems and network infrastructures to operate our business. We also hold data in various data center facilities upon which our business depends. A disruption, infiltration or failure of our information technology systems or any of our data centers as a result of software or hardware malfunctions, system implementations or upgrades, computer viruses, third-party security breaches, employee error, theft or misuse, malfeasance, power disruptions, natural disasters or accidents could cause breaches of data security, loss of intellectual property and critical data and the release and misappropriation of sensitive competitive information.
While we have implemented a number of protective measures, including firewalls, antivirus, patches, data encryption, log monitors, routine back-ups with offsite retention of storage media, system audits, data partitioning, routine password modifications and disaster recovery procedures, such measures may not be adequate or implemented properly to prevent or fully address the adverse effect of such events. If our systems were to fail or we are unable to successfully expand the capacity of these systems, or we are unable to integrate new technologies into our existing systems, our operations and financial results could suffer.
We have also outsourced significant elements of our information technology infrastructure and as a result we depend on third parties who are responsible for maintaining significant elements of our information technology systems and infrastructure and who may or could have access to our confidential information. The size and complexity of our information technology systems, and those of our third-party vendors, make such systems potentially vulnerable to service interruptions and security breaches from inadvertent or intentional actions by our employees, partners or vendors. These systems are also vulnerable to attacks by malicious third parties, and may be susceptible to intentional or accidental physical damage to the infrastructure maintained by us or by third parties. A breach of our security measures or the accidental loss, inadvertent disclosure, unapproved dissemination, misappropriation or misuse of trade secrets, proprietary information, or other confidential information, whether as a result of theft, hacking, fraud, trickery or other forms of deception, or for any other cause, could enable others to produce competing products, use our proprietary technology or information, and/or adversely affect our business. Further, any such interruption, security breach, loss or disclosure of confidential information could result in financial, legal, business, and reputational harm to us and could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Environmental and health safety laws may result in liabilities, expenses and restrictions on our operations.
Federal, state, local and foreign laws regarding environmental protection, hazardous substances and human health and safety may adversely affect our business. Using hazardous substances in our operations exposes us to the risk of accidental injury, contamination or other liability from the use, storage, importation, handling, or disposal of hazardous materials. If our or our suppliers’ operations result in the contamination of the environment or expose individuals to hazardous substances, we could be liable for damages and fines, and any liability could significantly exceed our insurance coverage and have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations. Future changes to environmental and health and safety laws could cause us to incur additional expenses or restrict our operations, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Unfavorable global economic conditions could adversely affect our business, financial condition, stock price and results of operations.
Our results of operations could be adversely affected by general conditions in the global economy and in the global financial markets and uncertainty about economic stability. We cannot predict whether future United States or international laws or regulations may impose tariffs or other trade restrictions that may have a material adverse effect on our business. For example, in recent periods, the United States government has announced, and may continue to announce, various import tariffs on goods imported from certain trade partners, which have resulted, and may continue to result, in reciprocal tariffs on goods exported from the United States to such trade partners. An escalating global trade war, including between the United States and China, could harm our business and growth prospects. The global economy and financial markets may also be adversely affected by the current or anticipated impact of military conflict, including the ongoing conflict between Israel and Hamas, the ongoing war between Russia and Ukraine, terrorism or other geopolitical events. Sanctions imposed by the United States and other countries in response to such conflicts, including the sanctions relating to Russia, may also adversely impact the financial markets and the global economy, and the economic countermeasures by the affected countries or others could exacerbate market and economic instability. There can be no assurance that further deterioration in credit and financial markets and confidence in economic conditions will not occur. A severe or prolonged economic downturn could result in a variety of risks to our business, including weakened demand for our products and our ability to raise additional capital when needed on acceptable terms, if at all. A weak or declining economy could also strain our suppliers, possibly resulting in supply disruption. If the equity and credit markets deteriorate, it may make any necessary debt or equity financing more difficult, more costly, and more dilutive. Failure to secure any necessary financing in a timely manner and on favorable terms could impair our ability to achieve our growth strategy, could harm our financial performance and stock price and could require us to delay or abandon development plans. In addition, there is a risk that our current or future service providers, manufacturers or other collaborators may not survive such difficult economic times, which could directly affect our ability to attain our operating goals. We cannot anticipate all of the ways in which the current economic climate and financial market conditions could adversely impact our business.
Risks Relating to Our Common Stock
Our shares of common stock could be delisted from the Nasdaq Capital Market which could result in, among other things, a decline in the price of our common stock and less liquidity for holders of shares of our common stock.
Our common stock is currently listed on the Nasdaq Capital Market. To maintain the listing of our common stock on the Nasdaq Capital Market, we are required to meet certain listing requirements, including, among others, (i) a minimum closing bid price of $1.00 per share (“Bid Price Requirement”), (ii) a market value of publicly held shares (excluding shares held by our executive officers, directors and 10% or more stockholders) of at least $1 million and (iii) either: (x) stockholders’ equity of at least $2.5 million; or (y) a total market value of listed securities of at least $35 million.
On June 29, 2023, we received a notification from the Listing Department of Nasdaq indicating that during the preceding 30 consecutive business day period, the closing price of our common stock was below $1.00 per share. Effective June 6, 2024, we implemented a reverse stock split of all our outstanding common stock at a ratio of one-to-ten shares. On June 24, 2024, we regained compliance with the Bid Price Requirement.
There can be no assurance that the market price per share of our common stock will remain in excess of the $1.00 minimum bid price for a sustained period of time. The continuing effect of a reverse stock split on the market price of our common stock cannot be predicted with any certainty, and the history of similar stock split combinations for companies in like circumstances is varied. It is possible that the per share price of our common stock after a reverse stock split will not rise in proportion to the reduction in the number of shares of common stock outstanding resulting from a reverse stock split, effectively reducing our market capitalization, and there can be no assurance that the market price per post-reverse split share will either exceed or remain in excess of the $1.00 minimum bid price for a sustained period of time. The market price of our common stock may vary based on other factors that are unrelated to the number of shares outstanding, including our future performance.
If we do not meet the minimum stockholders’ equity, minimum closing bid price requirements, or any other listing requirements, we would be subject to delisting from the Nasdaq Capital Market. The delisting of our common stock from a national exchange could impair the liquidity and market price of the common stock. It could also materially, adversely affect our access to the capital markets, and any limitation on market liquidity or reduction in the price of the common stock as a result of that delisting could adversely affect our ability to raise capital on terms acceptable to us, or at all.
Your percentage ownership will be further diluted in the future.
Your percentage ownership in our common stock will be diluted in the future because of equity awards that we expect will be granted to our directors, officers and employees. Our Equity Incentive Plan provides for the grant of equity-based awards, including restricted stock, restricted stock units, stock options, stock appreciation rights and other equity-based awards to our directors, officers and other employees, advisors and consultants. In connection with the Senior Term Facility, as amended, we issued a warrant to MidCap to purchase 80,000 shares of our common stock, with an exercise price of $8.80 per share. We also maintain a shelf-registration statement that provides us with the ability, from time to time, to offer and sell up to $25.0 million in securities, including selling up to an additional $8.9 million of our common stock in registered “at-the-market” offerings pursuant to an equity distribution agreement entered into with Ladenburg Thalmann & Co. Inc. in October 2021. As a result of shares sold or issued under the circumstances described above, your percentage ownership in our common stock will be diluted in the future.
Our stock price may be volatile, meaning purchasers of our common stock could incur substantial losses.
Our stock price has been and is likely to continue to be volatile. The stock market in general and the market for medical technology companies in particular have experienced extreme volatility that has often been unrelated to the operating performance of particular companies. The following factors, in addition to other risk factors described in this section and general market and economic conditions, may have a significant impact on the market price of our common stock:
•
failure of any of our products to achieve or continue to have commercial success;
•
the timing of regulatory approval for our future products;
•
adverse regulatory determinations with respect to our existing products;
•
results of our research and development efforts and our clinical trials;
•
the announcement of new products or product enhancements by us or our competitors;
•
regulatory developments in the U.S. and foreign countries;
•
our ability to manufacture our products to commercial standards;
•
developments concerning our clinical collaborators, suppliers or marketing partners;
•
changes in financial estimates or recommendations by securities analysts;
•
public concern over our products;
•
developments or disputes concerning patents or other intellectual property rights;
•
product liability claims and litigation against us or our competitors;
•
the departure of key personnel;
•
the strength of our balance sheet and any perceived need to raise additional funds;
•
variations in our financial results from expected financial results or those of companies that are perceived to be similar to us;
•
changes in the structure of third-party reimbursement in the U.S. and other countries;
•
changes in accounting principles or practices;
•
general economic, industry and market conditions; and
•
future sales of our common stock.
A decline in the market price of our common stock could cause you to lose some or all of your investment, limit your ability to sell your shares of stock and may adversely impact our ability to attract and retain employees and raise capital. In addition, stockholders have, and may in the future, initiate securities class action lawsuits if the market price of our stock drops significantly. Whether or not meritorious, litigation brought against us could result in substantial costs and could divert the time and attention of our management. Our insurance to cover claims of this sort may not be adequate.
Our charter documents and Delaware law may inhibit a takeover that stockholders consider favorable and could also limit the market price of our stock.
Provisions of our restated certificate of incorporation and bylaws and applicable provisions of Delaware law may make it more difficult for or prevent a third party from acquiring control of us without the approval of our Board of Directors. These provisions:
•
limit who may call a special meeting of stockholders;
•
establish advance notice requirements for nominations for election to our Board of Directors or for proposing matters that can be acted upon at stockholder meetings;
•
do not permit cumulative voting in the election of our directors, which would otherwise permit less than a majority of stockholders to elect directors;
•
prohibit stockholder action by written consent, thereby requiring all stockholder actions to be taken at a meeting of our stockholders; and
•
provide our Board of Directors the ability to designate the terms of and issue a new series of preferred stock without stockholder approval.
In addition, Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law generally limits our ability to engage in any business combination with certain persons who own 15% or more of our outstanding voting stock or any of our associates or affiliates who at any time in the past three years have owned 15% or more of our outstanding voting stock. In connection with the financing in May 2018, our Board of Directors exempted AGP SPVI, L.P. from the application of this provision in connection with its investment.
These provisions may have the effect of entrenching our management team and may deprive you of the opportunity to sell your shares to potential acquirers at a premium over prevailing prices. This potential inability to obtain a control premium could reduce the price of our common stock.
We have identified a material weakness in our internal controls over financial reporting, specifically related to a lack of detailed management review of account reconciliations and account analyses, including those prepared by third party specialists, and the failure to achieve and maintain effective internal control over our financial reporting could harm our business and negatively impact the market price of our common stock.
In connection with the preparation of our consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2024, we identified a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting related to a lack of detailed management review
of account reconciliations and account analyses, including those prepared by third-party specialists. In order to remediate this material weakness, we plan to improve our processes and controls, including senior management review, to achieve accurate financial accounting, reporting and disclosures. Although management believes this remediation action offers the highest likelihood of preventing future misstatements, the planned steps do not eliminate the potential for human error. There could continue to be a possibility that this control deficiency or others could result in a material misstatement of our annual or interim financial statements. This could cause investors to lose confidence in the accuracy and completeness of our financial reports and the market price of our common stock could be negatively affected, and we could become subject to investigations by the SEC or other regulatory authorities.

---

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
ITEM 1B.
UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
Not applicable.

---

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
ITEM 2.
PROPERTIES
We lease an 8,513 sq. ft. facility in Horsham, Pennsylvania that houses our executive offices and marketing. In August 2022, we exercised the lease renewal option and extended the term of the lease to expire in August 2026.
We lease a 17,000 sq. ft. facility consisting of office, manufacturing and warehousing space in Carlsbad, California. We terminated our existing lease that was set to expire in September 2024 and entered into a new lease in March 2024. The term of the lease commenced in April 2024 and expires in September 2029. Our Carlsbad facility houses the manufacturing and development operations for our excimer laser business, as well as the patient call center and reimbursement center.

---

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
ITEM 3.
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
From time to time in the ordinary course of our business, we may be a party to certain legal proceedings, incidental to the normal course of our business. These may include controversies relating to contract claims and employment related matters, some of which claims may be material, in which case, we will make separate disclosure as required.
In the ordinary course of business, we are, from time to time, subject to audits performed by state taxing authorities. These actions and proceedings are generally based on the position that the arrangements entered into by us are subject to sales and use tax rather than exempt from tax under applicable law. The states of New York and California have assessed us an aggregate of $5.2 million including penalties and interest. The audits cover the period from March 2014 through November 2022. We received notification that an administrative state judge in New York issued an opinion finding in favor of us that the sale of XTRAC treatment codes was not taxable as sales tax with respect to that state’s first assessment. This ruling covers $1.8 million of the total $5.2 million of assessments. The relevant taxing authority filed an appeal of the administrative law judge’s finding and, following the submission of legal briefs by both sides and oral argument held in January 2022, on May 6, 2022, we received a written decision from the State of New York Appeals Tribunal (“Tribunal”) overturning the favorable sales tax determination of the administrative law judge. We appealed the Tribunal’s decision to the New York State Appellate Division (“Appellate Division”), and posted the required appellate bond in the form of cash collateral. Oral argument was held by the Appellate Division on January 18, 2024.
On March 8, 2024, we received a decision from the Appellate Division ruling against us in the matter of our sales tax appeal, affirming the Tribunal's ruling that our sale of XTRAC treatment codes is subject to sales tax. The Appellate Division concluded that, through the usage arrangements, our customers had possession of the laser devices and had a license and ability to use the laser devices. The Appellate Division also agreed with the Tribunal that the primary function analysis was not applicable in this matter. On April 11, 2024, we filed a motion for leave to appeal the Appellate Division’s decision to the New York State Court of Appeals (“Court of Appeals”). On October 22, 2024, in an unsigned one-line decision, the Court of Appeals denied our motion to appeal the Appellate Division ruling. Therefore, the adverse decision stands and New York will execute on the appellate bond we posted for $1.3 million. As of December 31, 2024, we have accrued $1.8 million including penalties and interest as a result of the Appellate Division ruling. We are in the administrative process of appeal with respect to the remaining $1.3 million of assessments in the State of New York. We believe that the Appellate Division ruling provides an avenue for challenging the pending audit periods and subsequent periods, provided we can show that the value of the equipment provided to customers is either incidental to the overall value of the non-taxable services that are provided or should be treated similarly to pharmaceutical treatments, which are generally exempt from sales tax.
The State of California has made aggregate assessments of $2.1 million including penalties and interest. The audits cover the period from June 2018 through June 2022. We are in the administrative process of appeal in this jurisdiction as well.
In those states where we did not or may not prevail in the future with the defenses we have proposed and in the event there is a determination that the true object of our recurring revenue model is not exempt from sales taxes and is not a prescription medicine, or we do not have other defenses where we prevail, we may be subject to sales taxes in those particular states for previous years and in the future, plus potential interest and penalties. The precise scope, timing and time periods at issue, as well as the final outcomes of the investigations and judicial proceedings, remain uncertain. Accordingly, our estimate may change from time to time, and actual losses could vary.

---

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURE
ITEM 4.
MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
Not applicable.
PART II

---

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY
ITEM 5.
MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
As of March 20, 2025, we had 4,171,161 shares of common stock issued and outstanding, which are listed on the Nasdaq Capital Markets under the symbol “SSKN.” This did not include (i) options to purchase 521,726 shares of common stock, of which 231,467 were vested as of March 20, 2025, (ii) unissued restricted stock units of 2,265, or (iii) 80,000 shares of common stock reserved for issuance pursuant to a warrant.
DIVIDEND POLICY
We have not declared or paid any dividend on our common stock, since our inception. We do not anticipate that any dividends on our common stock will be declared or paid in the future. Any future determination relating to our dividend policy will be made at the discretion of our Board of Directors and will depend on then existing conditions, including our earnings, financial condition, results of operations, level of indebtedness, contractual restrictions, capital requirements, business prospects and other factors our Board of Directors may deem relevant. Our Board of Directors’ ability to declare a dividend is also subject to limits imposed by Delaware law and our credit facility.
SECURITIES AUTHORIZED FOR ISSUANCE UNDER EQUITY COMPENSATION PLANS
Equity Compensation Plan Information
The following is a summary of all of our equity compensation plans, including plans that were assumed through acquisitions and individual arrangements that provide for the issuance of equity securities as compensation, as of December 31, 2024. See Notes 1 and 12 to the consolidated financial statements for additional discussion.
Plan Category
Number of securities
to be issued upon
exercise of
outstanding
securities
(#)
Weighted average
exercise price of
outstanding
options ($)
Number of securities
remaining available
for future issuance
under equity
compensation plans
(excluding securities
reflected in
column(a)) (#)
(a)
(b)
(c)
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders
521,726
$
8.16
7,270,212
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders
-
-
-
521,726
$
8.16
7,270,212
RECENT SALES OF UNREGISTERED SECURITIES; USE OF PROCEEDS FROM REGISTERED SECURITIES
None.
ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
None.

---

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
ITEM 6.
[RESERVED]

---

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
ITEM 7.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
You should read the following discussion and analysis of our consolidated financial condition and results of operations together with our consolidated financial statements and the related notes and other financial information included in this Annual Report. Some of the information contained in this discussion and analysis or set forth elsewhere in this Annual Report, including information with respect to our plans and strategy for our business, includes forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties as described under the heading “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” elsewhere in this Annual Report. You should review the disclosure under the heading “Risk Factors” in this Annual Report for a discussion of important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the results described in or implied by the forward-looking statements contained in the following discussion and analysis.
Overview
STRATA Skin Sciences, Inc. is a medical technology company in dermatology dedicated to developing, commercializing, and marketing innovative products for the treatment of dermatologic conditions. Its products include the XTRAC® and Pharos® excimer lasers and VTRAC® lamp systems utilized in the treatment of psoriasis, vitiligo, and various other skin conditions, as well as the TheraClear® X Acne Therapy System utilized in the treatment of acne-related skin conditions.
The XTRAC ultraviolet light excimer laser system is utilized to treat psoriasis, vitiligo, and other skin diseases. The XTRAC excimer laser system received clearance from the United States Food and Drug Administration in 2000 and has since become a widely recognized treatment among dermatologists. The system delivers targeted 308nm ultraviolet light to affected areas of skin, leading to psoriasis clearing and vitiligo repigmentation, following a series of treatments. As of December 31, 2024, there were 864 XTRAC systems placed in dermatologists’ offices in the United States under our dermatology recurring procedures model, a decrease from 923 as of December 31, 2023. Under the dermatology recurring procedures model, the XTRAC system is placed in a physician’s office and fees are charged on a per procedure basis or a fee is charged on a periodic basis not to exceed an agreed upon number of procedures. The XTRAC system’s use for psoriasis is covered by nearly all major insurance companies, including Medicare. The VTRAC Excimer Lamp system, offered internationally in addition to the XTRAC, provides targeted therapeutic efficacy demonstrated by excimer technology with the simplicity of design and reliability of a lamp system. The Pharos excimer laser system holds FDA clearance to treat chronic skin diseases, including psoriasis, vitiligo, atopic dermatitis, and leukoderma. We believe there are approximately 8 million people in the United States and up to 125 million people worldwide suffering from psoriasis, and 1% to 2% of the world’s population suffers from vitiligo.
The TheraClear® X Acne Therapy System combines intense pulse light with vacuum (suction) for the treatment of mild to moderate inflammatory acne (including acne vulgaris), comedonal acne and pustular acne. The TheraClear device was cleared by the FDA through the 510(k) process. Currently, there is little insurance reimbursement coverage for acne treatments, such as those provided by TheraClear.
Our non-U.S. business focuses on a direct distribution model for equipment sales and recurring revenue, and we have distribution agreements in place in the Mid-East, Asia and Mexico.
Post-COVID-19 Pandemic
In late 2019, there was an outbreak of a new strain of coronavirus (“COVID-19”) which became a global pandemic. Since March 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic has negatively impacted business conditions in the industry in which we operate, disrupted global supply chains, constrained workforce participation, and created significant volatility and disruption of financial markets. The pandemic led to the suspension of elective procedures in the U.S. and to the temporary closure of many physician practices, which are our primary customers. While most physician offices have reopened, some of our partner physician practices closed permanently, and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and its variants on our operational and financial performance, including our ability to execute our business strategies and initiatives in the expected time frames is ongoing. We will continue to identify and plan around potential future pandemics and disruptions to our business.
Impact of Russia-Ukraine War
Prior to the outbreak of the Russia-Ukraine War, Ukraine was the largest exporter of noble gases including neon, krypton, and xenon and has historically been the source of a significant amount of gas supplied to us by our contract suppliers. Neon gas is essential to the proper functioning of our lasers. Our suppliers have been resourceful in continuing to supply gases to us but cannot assure us that the supply will not remain uninterrupted. The reduced supply and ongoing conflict have also impacted the price of gas worldwide. Additionally, the Creating Helpful Incentives to Produce Semiconductors and Science Act of 2022 has led to a further tightening of rare gas supplies as semiconductor chip manufacturers reconfigure their supply chains to address the need to secure their own supplies of rare gases for use in the manufacture of computer chips.
Impact of Middle East Conflict
We have not seen an impact on our distributors’ businesses in the Middle East due to the Middle East conflict, but cannot predict the impact should the conflict continue or develop into a larger war.
Key Technologies
•
XTRAC® Excimer Laser. XTRAC received FDA clearance in 2000 and has since become a widely recognized treatment among dermatologists for psoriasis and other skin diseases. The XTRAC System delivers ultra-narrowband ultraviolet B (“UVB”) light to affected areas of skin. Following a series of treatments typically performed twice weekly, psoriasis remission can be achieved, and vitiligo patches can be re-pigmented. XTRAC is endorsed by the National Psoriasis Foundation, and its use for psoriasis is covered by nearly all major insurance companies, including Medicare. We estimate that more than half of all major insurance companies now offer reimbursement for vitiligo as well.
•
In the third quarter of 2018, we announced the FDA granted clearance for our Multi Micro Dose (“MMD”) tip for our XTRAC excimer laser. The MMD Tip accessory is indicated for use in conjunction with the XTRAC laser system to filter the Narrow Band UVB (“NB-UVB”) light at delivery in order to calculate and individualize the maximum non-blistering dose for a particular patient.
•
In January 2020, we announced the FDA granted clearance of our XTRAC Momentum Excimer Laser Platform. In February 2022, we announced the commercial launch, with the first installation in the U.S. market, of our next generation excimer laser system, XTRAC Momentum® 1.0.
•
VTRAC® Lamp. VTRAC received FDA clearance in 2005 and provides targeted therapeutic efficacy demonstrated by excimer technology with the simplicity of design and reliability of a lamp system.
•
TheraClear® X Acne Treatment Device. The TheraClear® Acne Therapy System combines intense pulse light with vacuum (suction) for the treatment of mild to moderate inflammatory acne (including acne vulgaris), comedonal acne and pustular acne.
Recent Developments
MidCap Financing
We amended our credit facility with MidCap Financial Trust (“MidCap”) on February 20, 2024 to, among other things, revise the applicable minimum net revenue threshold financial covenant. On March 27, 2024, we further amended the agreement to clarify certain provisions related to the maintenance of cash collateral accounts. (For more information, see Note 9. Long-term Debt to the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.)
Reverse Stock Split
On October 26, 2023, the stockholders of the Company authorized our Board of Directors to effect a reverse stock split of all outstanding shares of common stock. On April 26, 2024, the Board of Directors approved the implementation of a reverse stock split at a ratio of one-for-ten shares, which became effective on June 6, 2024.
Equity Distribution Agreement
In October 2021, we entered into an equity distribution agreement under which we may sell up to $11.0 million of our shares of common stock in registered “at-the-market” offerings. The shares will be offered at prevailing market prices, and we will pay commissions of up to 3.0% of the gross proceeds from the sale of shares sold through our agent, which may act as an agent and/or principal. In July 2024, we sold 665,136 shares of our common stock under the equity distribution agreement at an average purchase price of $3.16 per share for total gross and net proceeds of $2.1 million and $1.9 million, respectively.
Management
On August 12, 2024, Christopher Lesovitz, our Chief Financial Officer, submitted his resignation effective August 14, 2024. On November 13, 2024, we designated our Vice President Finance, John Gillings, as our principal financial officer and Chief Accounting Officer.
Components of Results of Operations
Revenues
To date, we have generated revenues primarily from the placement of our lasers in physicians’ offices and the related sales and rentals and the recurring revenues from our sale of treatment sessions.
Dermatology Recurring Procedures Segment: we have primarily two types of arrangements for our phototherapy treatment equipment as follows: (i) we place our lasers in a physician’s office at no charge to the physician, and generally charge the physician a fee for an agreed upon number of treatments; or (ii) we place our lasers in a physician’s office and charge the physician a fixed fee for a specified period of time not to exceed an agreed upon number of treatments; if that number is exceeded additional fees will be paid.
Dermatology Procedures Equipment Segment: we sell our products internationally through distributors and domestically, directly to a physician. We also derive revenues from service and repair extended warranty contracts with our existing customers.
We refer you to the section titled “-Critical Accounting Policies and Use of Estimates-Revenue Recognition” appearing elsewhere in this Annual Report for additional information regarding how we account for revenues.
Sales in the United States represented 62% and 69% of our total revenues for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively, and have been generated by our direct sales force. Outside the United States, our sales are made through third-party distributors. International revenues were 38% and 31% for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. We expect that both our United States and international revenues will increase in the near term as we continue to expand our product offerings and increase the related patient utilization in the United States, as well as grow our presence in Asia.
Cost of Revenues and Gross Margin
Cost of revenues primarily consists of the costs of components and the manufacture of our XTRAC, VTRAC and TheraClear systems. Cost of revenues also includes costs related to personnel, depreciation, amortization, warranty, shipping, and our operations and field service departments.
Our gross profit is calculated by subtracting our cost of revenues from our revenues. We calculate our gross margin as our gross profit divided by our revenues. Our gross margin has been and will continue to be affected by a variety of factors, primarily product sales mix and pricing manufacturing costs. Our gross margins on revenues from sales of dermatology procedures equipment are lower than our gross margins on revenues from sales of dermatology recurring procedures and, as a result, the sales mix between dermatology recurring procedures and dermatology procedures equipment can affect the gross margin in any reporting period.
Engineering and Product Development
Engineering and product development expenses consist primarily of personnel expenses, including salaries and related benefits for employees in engineering, product development, regulatory and quality assurance functions. We typically use our employee, consultant and infrastructure resources across our engineering and product development programs.
We plan to incur engineering and product development expenses for the near future as we expect to continue our development that focuses on the application of our XTRAC system for the treatment of inflammatory skin disorders. As a result, we expect our engineering and product development expenses to remain similar to our fiscal year 2024 expenses.
Selling and Marketing
Selling and marketing expenses consist of market research and commercial activities related to the sale of our dermatology recurring procedures and dermatology procedures equipment sales, and salaries and related benefits and sales commissions for employees focused on these efforts. Other significant sales and marketing costs include conferences and trade shows, promotional and marketing activities, including direct and online marketing to the consumer and dermatologists, practice support programs, travel and training expenses.
We anticipate that our selling and marketing expenses will increase compared to our fiscal year 2024 expenses as we continue our direct-to-patient advertising campaign aimed at motivating psoriasis and vitiligo patients to seek out XTRAC treatments from our physician partners.
General and Administrative
General and administrative expenses consist primarily of personnel expenses, including salaries and related benefits, share-based compensation and travel expenses, for employees in executive, finance, information technology, legal and human resource functions. General and administrative expenses also include the cost of insurance, outside legal fees, accounting and other consulting services, audit fees from our independent registered public accounting firm, Board of Directors’ fees and other administrative costs, such as corporate facility costs, including rent, utilities, depreciation and maintenance not otherwise included in cost of revenues.
We anticipate that our general and administrative expenses will decrease compared to our fiscal year 2024 expenses as we continue to manage our expenses and seek cost reductions.
Impairment of Goodwill
Impairment expense consists of an impairment charge related to goodwill resulting from the acquisition of the XTRAC and VTRAC businesses in 2015. We test goodwill for impairment during the fourth quarter of each year and whenever circumstances indicate the carrying value of goodwill may not be recoverable. Based on the assessments performed in the fourth quarters of 2024 and 2023 in conjunction with the annual budgeting process, we recorded impairment in both 2024 and 2023 for the amount by which the carrying value of the dermatology recurring procedures reporting unit exceeded its fair value. The impairments were primarily driven by a decline in projected cash flows, including revenues and profitability.
Interest Expense
Interest expense consists of cash interest payable under our debt facility and non-cash interest attributable to the amortization of deferred financing costs related to our indebtedness.
Interest Income
Interest income is earned on our cash and cash equivalents account balances.
Loss on Debt Extinguishment
During the second quarter of 2023, we refinanced our Senior Term Facility with MidCap (see Note 9. Long-term Debt to the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements). The new loan was considered substantially different from the original loan and, as such, we recorded a loss on debt extinguishment during the year ended December 31, 2023. There were no significant changes to our Senior Term Facility during the year ended December 31, 2024.
Other Income
During the second quarter of 2024, we applied for the Employee Retention Credit (“ERC”) under the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (“CARES Act”), which is a refundable tax credit that encouraged businesses to keep employees on the payroll during the COVID-19 pandemic. Eligible employers could qualify for up to $7.0 thousand of credit for each employee based on qualified wages paid after December 31, 2020 and before January 1, 2022. Qualified wages are any wages paid to an employee (for employers that averaged fewer than 100 full-time employees in 2019) or the wages paid to an employee for the time that the employee is providing and not providing services (for employers that averaged more than 500 full-time employees in 2019) due to an economic hardship, specifically, either (1) a full or partial suspension of operations by order of a governmental authority due to COVID-19, or (2) a significant decline in gross receipts. We recognized ERC funds received as other income during the year ended December 31, 2024.
Income Taxes
As of December 31, 2024, we had federal and state net operating loss (“NOL”) carryforwards of $203.5 million and $62.8 million, respectively. The NOL carryforwards generated prior to 2018 began to expire for federal income tax purposes and begin expiring in 2030 for state income tax purposes. Federal and many state NOLs generated in 2018 and into the future now have an indefinite life.
In general, under Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or the Code, a corporation that undergoes an "ownership change" is subject to limitations on its ability to utilize its NOLs to offset future taxable income. We have not completed a study to assess whether an ownership change has occurred in the past. Our existing NOLs may be subject to limitations arising from previous ownership changes, and if we undergo an ownership change, our ability to utilize NOLs could be further limited by Section 382 of the Code. Future changes in our stock ownership, some of which are outside of our control, could result in an ownership change under Section 382 of the Code. Our NOLs are also subject to international regulations, which could restrict our ability to utilize our NOLs. Furthermore, our ability to utilize NOLs of companies that we may acquire in the future may be subject to limitations. There is also a risk that due to regulatory changes, such as suspensions on the use of NOLs, or other unforeseen reasons, our existing NOLs could expire or otherwise be unavailable to offset future income tax liabilities.
Results of Operations
Comparison of the Years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023
Year Ended December 31,
Change
(in thousands)
Dollar
Percentage
Revenues, net
$
33,562
$
33,358
$
%
Cost of revenues
14,481
14,897
(416
)
(3
)%
Gross profit
19,081
18,461
%
Operating expenses:
Engineering and product development
1,317
(434
)
(33
)%
Selling and marketing
12,289
12,956
(667
)
(5
)%
General and administrative
11,303
10,508
%
Impairment of goodwill
3,861
2,284
1,577
%
28,336
27,065
1,271
%
Loss from operations
(9,255
)
(8,604
)
(651
)
%
Other (expense) income:
Interest expense
(2,107
)
(1,640
)
(467
)
%
Interest income
%
Loss on debt extinguishment
-
(909
)
(100
)%
Other income
-
%
(1,001
)
(2,318
)
1,317
(57
)%
Loss before benefit from income taxes
$
(10,256
)
$
(10,922
)
$
(6
)%
Revenues
Revenues by Geography
The following table presents revenues by geography for the periods presented below:
Year Ended December 31,
Change
(in thousands)
Dollar
Percentage
Domestic
$
20,888
$
23,028
$
(2,140
)
(9
)%
International
12,674
10,330
2,344
%
Total revenues
$
33,562
$
33,358
$
%
Revenues by Product Type
The following table presents revenues by segment for the periods presented below:
Year Ended December 31,
Change
(in thousands)
Dollar
Percentage
Dermatology recurring procedures
$
21,171
$
21,530
$
(359
)
(2
)%
Dermatology procedures equipment
12,391
11,828
%
Total revenues
$
33,562
$
33,358
$
%
Dermatology Recurring Procedures
Recurring treatment revenues for the year ended December 31, 2024 were $21.2 million, which we estimate is approximately 253,000 XTRAC treatments with prices between $65 and $100 per treatment, compared to recurring treatment revenues for the year ended December 31, 2023 of $21.5 million, which we estimate is approximately 280,000 XTRAC treatments with prices between $65 and $95 per treatment. Subsequent to the launch of the TheraClear Acne Therapy System, there were 144 and 92 TheraClear devices placed in dermatologists’ offices in the United States under our recurring procedures model as of December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively.
Increases in procedures are dependent upon building market acceptance through marketing programs with our physician partners and their patients to show that the XTRAC procedures will be of clinical benefit and will be generally reimbursed by insurers. We believe that several factors have an impact on the prescribed use of XTRAC treatments for psoriasis and vitiligo patients. Specifically, we believe that there is a lack of awareness of the positive effects of XTRAC treatments among both sufferers and providers; and the treatment regimen, which can sometimes require up to 12 or more treatments, has limited XTRAC use to certain patient populations. We reduced our direct-to-patient advertising over the course of 2023, which we believe contributed to a reduction in the number of XTRAC treatments compared to prior periods that continued into 2024. Therefore, our strategy going forward is to continue to increase our direct-to-patient program for XTRAC advertising in the United States, targeting psoriasis and vitiligo patients through a variety of media and through our use of social media such as Facebook and X (formerly Twitter), and aimed at motivating them to seek out XTRAC treatments from our physician partners . We monitor the results of our advertising expenditures in this area to reach the more than 10 million patients in the United States we believe are afflicted with these diseases.
Revenues from dermatology recurring procedures are recognized as revenue over the estimated usage period of the agreed upon number of treatments, as the treatments are being used. As of both December 31, 2024 and 2023, we deferred domestic net revenues of $1.6 million, which will be recognized as revenue over the remaining usage period for the related placements.
Dermatology Procedures Equipment
For the year ended December 31, 2024, dermatology procedures equipment revenues were $12.4 million. Internationally, we sold 98 systems (89 XTRAC and 9 VTRAC). Domestically, we sold 12 XTRAC systems for the year ended December 31, 2024.
For the year ended December 31, 2023, dermatology procedures equipment revenues were $11.8 million. Internationally, we sold 68 systems (60 XTRAC and 8 VTRAC). Domestically, we sold 24 XTRAC systems for the year ended December 31, 2023.
The $0.6 million increase in dermatology procedures equipment revenues from the year ended December 31, 2023 to the year ended December 31, 2024 was primarily the result of a $1.6 million increase in international equipment sales, partially offset by a $0.2 million decrease in deferred service revenue associated with service contracts assumed in connection with the Pharos asset acquisition due to the expiration of those contracts during 2024 and a $0.6 million decrease in domestic equipment sales that was due to a temporary shift in strategy during 2023 whereby we offered physicians in the United States the option to purchase lasers rather than operate under the dermatology recurring procedures model.
Cost of Revenues and Gross Profit
The following tables present changes in our gross profit, by segment, for the periods presented below:
Dermatology Recurring Procedures
Year Ended December 31,
Change
(in thousands, except percentages)
Dollar
Percentage
Revenues
$
21,171
$
21,530
$
(359
)
(2
)%
Cost of revenues
7,893
8,729
(836
)
(10
)%
Gross profit
$
13,278
$
12,801
$
%
Gross profit percentage
62.7
%
59.5
%
Gross profit increased to $13.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2024 from $12.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2023. As a percentage of revenues, gross profit was 62.7% for the year ended December 31, 2024, as compared to 59.5% for the year ended December 31, 2023. The increase in gross profit percentage from 2023 to 2024 was primarily the result of lower amortization costs due to the write-down of the product technology intangible asset for the TheraClear devices in the fourth quarter of 2023 in connection with the revaluation of the contingent consideration related to the TheraClear asset acquisition, partially offset by higher depreciation costs due to more XTRAC lasers and TheraClear devices placed into service.
Dermatology Procedures Equipment
Year Ended December 31,
Change
(in thousands, except percentages)
Dollar
Percentage
Revenues
$
12,391
$
11,828
$
%
Cost of revenues
6,588
6,168
%
Gross profit
$
5,803
$
5,660
$
%
Gross profit percentage
46.8
%
47.9
%
Gross profit increased to $5.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2024 from $5.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2023. As a percentage of revenues, gross profit was 46.8% for the year ended December 31, 2024, as compared to 47.9% for the year ended December 31, 2023. The decrease in gross profit percentage from 2023 to 2024 was primarily the result of a reduction in service billings related to Pharos laser system products and the write-off of inventories related to Pharos laser system products that will no longer be needed for warranty purposes due to the expiration of the related warranty service contracts, an increase in maintenance costs largely driven by TheraClear devices placed into service, and a discount on the sale of certain lasers to an international distributor, partially offset by a decrease in domestic sales with longer warranty periods, leading to a lower amount of deferred revenue for those sales.
Engineering and Product Development
For the year ended December 31, 2024, engineering and product development expenses were $0.9 million as compared to $1.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2023. Engineering and product development costs during the year ended December 31, 2024 were lower primarily as a result of a decrease in salaries and outside services.
Selling and Marketing
As of December 31, 2024, our sales and marketing personnel consisted of 39 full-time positions, compared to 35 full-time positions as of December 31, 2023, inclusive of a vice president of sales and a vice president of marketing and business growth, direct sales organization as well as an in-house call center staffed with patient advocates and a reimbursement group that provides necessary insurance information to our physician partners and their patients.
For the year ended December 31, 2024, sales and marketing expenses were $12.3 million as compared to $13.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2023. Sales and marketing expenses for the year ended December 31, 2024 were lower primarily as a result of decreases in (i) salaries and other employee related expenses due to a reduction in the number of executives in this department, (ii) external consulting fees, and (iii) other corporate marketing and communication expenses, partially offset by increases from our direct-to-patient advertising campaign aimed at motivating psoriasis and vitiligo patients to seek out XTRAC treatments from our physician partners.
General and Administrative
For the year ended December 31, 2024, general and administrative expenses increased to $11.3
million from $10.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2023. General and administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 2024 were higher primarily as a result of an increase in our sales tax accrual (see Note 10. Commitments and Contingencies to the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements), the allowance for credit losses and certain employee related expenses, partially offset by lower stock-based compensation expense and lower accounting and legal expenses.
Impairment of Goodwill
For the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, impairment expense was $3.9 million and $2.3 million, respectively. The impairment charges relate to goodwill associated with the dermatology recurring procedures segment and were primarily driven by a decline in projected cash flows, including revenues and profitability.
Interest Expense
Interest expense is primarily attributable to our debt obligations. For the year ended December 31, 2024, interest expense increased to $2.1 million from $1.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2023. The increase was primarily the result of the additional $7.0 million borrowed under our Senior Term Facility on June 30, 2023.
Loss on Debt Extinguishment
During the second quarter of 2023, we refinanced our Senior Term Facility with MidCap (see Note 9. Long-term Debt to the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements). The new loan was considered substantially different from the original loan and, as such, we recorded a loss on debt extinguishment of $0.9 million during the year ended December 31, 2023. During the first quarter of 2024, we amended the Senior Term Facility, which has been accounted for as a debt modification, as the new loan is not considered substantially different from the existing loan. There was no debt extinguishment during the year ended December 31, 2024.
Other Income
During the year ended December 31, 2024, we received $0.9 million from the Employee Retention Credit, a refundable tax credit available under the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Securities Act (“CARES Act”) that was designed to keep employees on the payroll during the COVID-19 pandemic. There was no such credit received during the year ended December 31, 2023.
Benefit from Income Taxes
We recognized a benefit from income taxes of $0.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2024 as compared to a benefit from income taxes of $0.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2023, which is comprised primarily of changes in the deferred tax liability related to goodwill.
Non-GAAP Financial Measures
We have determined to supplement our consolidated financial statements, prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”), presented elsewhere within this report, with certain non-GAAP measures of financial performance. These non-GAAP measures include non-GAAP adjusted EBITDA, “Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization.”
This non-GAAP disclosure has limitations as an analytical tool, should not be viewed as a substitute for Net Earnings (Loss) determined in accordance with U.S. GAAP, should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for analysis of our results as reported under U.S. GAAP, nor is it necessarily comparable to non-GAAP performance measures that may be presented by other companies. We consider these non-GAAP measures in addition to our results prepared under current accounting standards, but they are not a substitute for, nor superior to, U.S. GAAP measures. These non-GAAP measures are provided to enhance readers’ overall understanding of our current financial performance and to provide further information for comparative purposes. This supplemental presentation should not be construed as an inference that the our future results will be unaffected by similar adjustments to Net Earnings (Loss) determined in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Specifically, we believe the non-GAAP measures provide useful information to management and investors by isolating certain expenses, gains and losses that may not be indicative of our core operating results and business outlook. In addition, we believe non-GAAP measures enhance the comparability of results against prior periods.
Reconciliation to the most directly comparable U.S. GAAP measure of all non-GAAP measures included in this Annual Report is as follows:
Year Ended December 31,
(in thousands)
Net loss
$
(10,086
)
$
(10,830
)
Adjustments:
Depreciation and amortization
4,968
5,553
Amortization of operating lease right-of-use asset
Loss on disposal of property and equipment
Benefit from income taxes
(170
)
(92
)
Interest income
(242
)
(231
)
Interest expense
2,107
1,640
Non-GAAP EBITDA
(3,035
)
(3,539
)
Impairment of goodwill
3,861
2,284
Stock-based compensation
1,303
Loss on debt extinguishment
-
Employee retention credit
(864
)
-
Non-GAAP adjusted EBITDA
$
$
Liquidity and Capital Resources
As of December 31, 2024, we had cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash of $8.6 million and an accumulated deficit of $248.1 million. Net cash provided by operations was $0.2 million during the year ended December 31, 2024 and net cash used in operations was $0.5 million during the year ended December 31, 2023. We have historically incurred operating losses, and we anticipate that our operating losses will continue in the near term as we seek to expand our sales and marketing initiatives to support our growth in existing and new markets, invest funds in additional engineering and product development activities and utilize cash for other corporate purposes. Our primary sources of capital have been from borrowings under our debt facilities and sales of our products. As of December 31, 2024, we had $15.0 million of borrowings outstanding under our credit facility with MidCap, which has a final maturity in June 2028.
In September 2021, we entered into a credit and security agreement with MidCap, also acting as the administrative agent, and the lenders identified therein and borrowed $8.0 million in the form of a senior term loan. The term loan bore interest at LIBOR (with a LIBOR floor rate of 0.50%) plus 7.50% per year. In September 2022, we amended the credit facility to transition, upon the cessation of LIBOR, to bear interest at one-month Secured Overnight Financing Rate (“SOFR”), or such other applicable period, plus 0.10%, with a floor of 0.50%. In June 2023, we amended the credit facility to: (i) refinance our existing $8.0 million term loan, (ii) borrow an additional $7.0 million, and (iii) provide for an additional $5.0 million tranche that could have been drawn under certain conditions in 2024. The facility matures on June 1, 2028. Borrowings under the credit facility bear interest at a rate per annum equal to the sum of (a) the greater of (i) the sum of (A) 30-day forward-looking term rate of one month SOFR, as published by CME Group Benchmark Administration Limited, from time to time, plus (B) 0.10%, and (ii) the applicable floor rate of 3.50%, with such sum reset monthly, and (b) 7.50%. We are obligated to make interest-only payments through June 2026. From July 2026 to maturity, we will make principal payments in 24 equal installments. We also amended and restated the existing warrant to allow MidCap to purchase 80,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $8.80 per share for a 10-year period ending June 30, 2033. The loan is senior to all other indebtedness and is secured by substantially all of our assets. We are subject to customary affirmative and negative covenants including a financial covenant based on minimum net revenue thresholds. Upon an event of default, including a covenant violation, all principal and interest are due on demand.
In February 2024, the parties amended the credit facility to, among other things, revise the applicable minimum net revenue threshold financial covenant. For the trailing 12-month period ended December 31, 2024, this amount was set at $30.0 million, increasing to $33.0 million as set forth in such amendment for the trailing 12-month periods thereafter. In March 2024, the credit facility was further amended (as amended to date, “Senior Term Facility”) to clarify certain provisions related to the maintenance of cash collateral accounts.
In January 2022, we acquired certain assets related to the TheraClear devices from Theravant. Theravant is eligible to receive up to $3.0 million in future earnout payments upon the achievement of certain annual net revenue milestones ($1.0 million of which is due upon the earlier of achieving a revenue target or July 2025), up to $20.0
million in future royalty payments based upon a percentage of gross profit from future domestic sales ranging from 10-20%, 25% of gross profit from international sales over the subsequent four-year period, and up to $0.5 million in future milestone payments upon the achievement of certain development and commercialization related targets. Through December 31, 2024, we have incurred an aggregate of $0.1 million of royalty and gross profit payments based on gross profit from domestic and international sales.
In October 2021, we entered into an equity distribution agreement with an investment bank under which we may sell up to $11.0 million of our shares of common stock in registered “at-the-market” offerings. The shares will be offered at prevailing market prices, and we will pay commissions of up to 3.00% of the gross proceeds from the sale of shares sold through our agent, which may act as an agent and/ or principal. We have no obligation to sell any shares under this agreement and may, at any time, suspend solicitations under this agreement. In July 2024, we sold 665,136 shares of our common stock for gross proceeds of approximately $2.1 million. As of December 31, 2024, we may sell up to an additional $8.9 million of our shares of common stock under this distribution agreement.
We cannot predict our revenues and expenses in the short term as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, the ongoing Russia-Ukraine war, the Middle East conflict, supply chain disruptions, rising interest rates, and related responses by our customers and our ultimate consumers as a result thereof. Based on our current business plan, we believe that our cash and cash equivalents, combined with the anticipated revenues from the sale or use of our products and operating expense management, will be sufficient to satisfy our working capital needs, capital asset purchases, outstanding commitments and other liquidity requirements associated with our existing operations for at least the next 12 months following the date of the issuance of this Annual Report. However, if these sources are insufficient to satisfy our liquidity requirements, we may seek to sell additional debt or equity securities or enter into a new credit facility or another form of third-party funding or seek other debt financing. If we raise additional funds by issuing equity or equity-linked securities, our stockholders would experience dilution and any new equity securities could have rights, preferences, and privileges superior to those of holders of our common stock. Debt financing, if available, may involve covenants restricting our operations or our ability to incur additional debt. We cannot be assured that additional equity, equity-linked or debt financing will be available on terms favorable to us or our stockholders, or at all. It is also possible that we may allocate significant amounts of capital towards products or technologies for which market demand is lower than expected and, as a result, abandon such efforts. If we are unable to maintain our current financing or obtain adequate additional financing when we require it, or if we obtain financing on terms which are not favorable to us, or if we expend capital on products or technologies that are unsuccessful, our ability to continue to support our business growth and to respond to business challenges could be significantly limited, or we may be required to delay the development, commercialization and marketing of our products.
The following table summarizes our sources and uses of cash for each of the periods presented:
Year Ended December 31,
(in thousands)
Cash provided by (used in)
Operating activities
$
$
(519
)
Investing activities
(1,636
)
(5,019
)
Financing activities
1,925
6,861
Net increase in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash
$
$
1,323
Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities was $0.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2024, compared to net cash used in operating activities of $0.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2023. The change in net cash provided by operating activities during the current period as compared to net cash used in operating activities in the prior period was primarily due to (i) a decrease in net loss of approximately $0.7 million and (ii) an increase in cash provided by changes in current balance sheet accounts in the ordinary course of business of approximately $0.8 million, primarily due to an increase of $2.5 million in accrued expenses primarily due to the adverse Appellate Division ruling with respect to the applicability of sales and use taxes to our sales of XTRAC treatment codes, partially offset by decreases of $0.8 million from accounts receivable due to increased sales to international customers who take longer to pay and $0.9 million from accounts payable due to timing, partially offset by (iii) a $0.8 million decrease in cash provided from non-cash adjustments.
Investing Activities
Net cash used in investing activities was $1.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2024, compared to net cash used in investing activities of $5.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2023. The decrease is primarily the result of a greater emphasis on refurbishing units that have been recalled from underperforming accounts as part of our stated plan to realign devices, which has a lower cost than building new units.
Financing Activities
Net cash provided by financing activities was $1.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2024, compared to cash provided by financing activities of $6.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2023. The financing activity for the year ended December 31, 2024 primarily consisted of $1.9 million in net proceeds from the sale of common stock under the equity distribution agreement, whereas the cash provided by financing activities in 2023 was primarily due to the refinancing of the Senior Term Facility, pursuant to which we borrowed an additional $6.9 million, net of financing costs.
Contractual Obligations and Commitments
Debt Obligations
In September 2021, we entered into an $8.0 million credit and security agreement with MidCap. In June 2023, we amended our credit facility with MidCap to: (i) refinance our existing $8.0 million term loan, (ii) borrow an additional $7.0 million, and (iii) provide for an additional $5.0 million tranche that could have been drawn under certain conditions in 2024. The facility matures on June 1, 2028. Borrowings under the credit facility bear interest at a rate per annum equal to the sum of (a) the greater of (i) the sum of (A) 30-day forward-looking term rate of one month SOFR, as published by CME Group Benchmark Administration Limited, from time to time, plus (B) 0.10%, and (ii) the applicable floor rate of 3.50%, with such sum reset monthly, and (b) 7.50%. We are obligated to make interest-only payments through June 2026. From July 2026 to maturity, we will make principal payments in 24 equal installments. The loan is senior to all other indebtedness and is secured by substantially all of our assets. We are subject to customary affirmative and negative covenants including a financial covenant based on minimum net revenue thresholds. Upon an event of default, including a covenant violation, all principal and interest are due on demand. The credit facility was further amended in February 2024 to, among other things, revise the applicable minimum net revenue threshold financial covenant, and in March 2024 to clarify certain provisions related to the maintenance of cash collateral accounts.
Operating Lease Obligations
We lease our facilities and certain IT and office equipment under non-cancellable operating leases with remaining lease terms of up to five years. Remaining lease obligations are $1.2 million as of December 31, 2024, with payments of $0.3 million due within the next year.
Contingent Consideration
Theravant, the seller of the TheraClear devices, is eligible to receive up to $3.0 million in future earnout payments upon the achievement of certain annual net revenue milestones ($1.0 million of which is due upon the earlier of achieving a revenue target or July 2025), up to $20.0 million in future royalty payments based upon a percentage of gross profit from future domestic sales ranging from 10-20%, 25% of gross profit from international sales over the subsequent four-year period, and up to $0.5 million in future milestone payments upon the achievement of certain commercialization related targets. We have notified Theravant that we believe the earnout payments are not due and will not be due in the future. Theravant has disputed our contention and the matter is under discussion among the signatories to the purchase agreement. Through December 31, 2024, we have incurred $0.1 million of royalty and gross profit payments based on gross profit from domestic and international sales. As of December 31, 2024, we have estimated the future earnout payments at $1.1 million, of which $1.0 million is expected to be paid within the next year unless an agreement between the parties is negotiated. Due to uncertainties associated with the development of a new product line and the use of estimates and assumptions to determine the fair value of the contingent consideration, the amount ultimately paid in connection with the earnout may differ from the estimated fair value.
Milestone Payments
In January 2022, we entered into a Development Agreement (the “Development Agreement”) with Theravant. Under the Development Agreement, we will reimburse Theravant for costs incurred in further developing certain TheraClear technology and other healthcare products and methods for the medical aesthetic marketplace. In connection with the development of three devices, Theravant is eligible to receive $0.5 million upon FDA clearance for each device and $0.5 million upon achievement of certain net revenue targets for each device, aggregating to $3.0 million of potential future milestone payments under the Development Agreement. The Development Agreement had a three-year term, unless terminated sooner by either party and expired in January 2025. No milestone payments were incurred under the Development Agreement, nor do we anticipate that any such payments may be due in the future.
Impact of Inflation
We do not believe that inflation has had a material effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations during the year ended December 31, 2024.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The preparation of our financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, or GAAP, and the rules and regulations of the SEC requires us to make estimates and assumptions, based on judgments considered reasonable, which affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. We base our estimates and assumptions on historical experience, known trends and events and various other factors that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying value of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Although we believe our estimates and assumptions are reasonable when made, they are based upon information available to us at the time they are made. We evaluate our estimates and assumptions on an ongoing basis and, if necessary, make adjustments. Due to the risks and uncertainties involved in our business and evolving market conditions and given the subjective element of the estimates and assumptions made, actual results may differ from estimated results.
We define our critical accounting policies as those accounting policies that are most important to the portrayal of our financial condition and results of operations and require our most difficult and subjective judgments. While our significant accounting policies are more fully described in “Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” in our audited financial statements and related notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this Annual Report, we believe the following discussion addresses our most critical accounting policies.
Revenue Recognition
We have primarily two types of arrangements for our phototherapy treatment equipment from which we earn revenues from dermatology recurring procedures: (i) we place our lasers in a physician’s office at no charge to the physician, and generally charge the physician a fee for an agreed upon number of treatments; or (ii) we place our lasers in a physician’s office and charge the physician a fixed fee for a specified period of time not to exceed an agreed upon number of treatments; if that number is exceeded additional fees will have to be paid. Revenues attributable to these types of arrangements are accounted for under the guidance applicable to leases. These arrangements are similar to operating leases since we provide the customers limited arrangement rights to use the treatment equipment, the treatment equipment resides in the physician’s office and we may exercise the right to remove the equipment upon notice, under certain circumstances, while the physician controls the utility and output of such equipment during the term of the arrangement as it pertains to the use of access codes to treat the patients. For the first type of arrangement, sales of access codes are considered variable treatment code payments and are recognized as revenue over the estimated usage period of the agreed upon number of treatments. For the second type of arrangement, customers purchase access codes and revenue is recognized on a straight-line basis as the lasers are being used over the term specified in the agreement. Variable treatment code payments that will be paid only if the customer exceeds the agreed upon number of treatments are recognized only when such treatments are being exceeded and used.
We recognize revenue from dermatology procedures equipment sales when control of the promised good or service is transferred to our customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which we expect to be entitled in exchange for those good or services. Accordingly, we determine revenue recognition by applying the following steps:
•
identification of the contract, or contracts, with a customer;
•
identification of the performance obligations in the contract;
•
determination of the transaction price;
•
allocation of the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract; and
•
recognition of revenues when, or as, we satisfy a performance obligation.
A contract’s transaction price is allocated to each performance obligation and recognized as revenue when, or as, the performance obligation is satisfied, which is generally the point in time when the product is shipped or control is transferred for our dermatology procedures equipment sales. We sell to physicians in the United States and to third-party distributors outside the United States and do not provide return rights. Sales to distributors outside the United States are made in U.S. dollars. In addition, we provide a one to two-year warranty for systems sold in the United States. Terms of the of the product warranty differ amongst our third-party distributors outside the United States but are generally two years. These assurance-type warranties are not considered a separate performance obligation. We provide for the estimated cost to repair or replace products under any warranty at the time of sale. We also earn revenue from customers from services outside of their warranty term or annual service contracts. Revenue from these service-type warranties is recognized as the services are provided.
Contingent Consideration
The purchase price for certain assets acquired related to TheraClear devices during January 2022 includes earnout payments, or contingent consideration. Estimates that involve a significant level of estimation uncertainty include the valuation of contingent consideration, which was determined using forecasted financial information available at the acquisition date, a discount rate, revenue volatility, a cost of equity and various other assumptions. Due to uncertainties associated with the development of a new product line and the use of estimates and assumptions to determine the fair value of the contingent consideration, the amount ultimately paid in connection with the earnout may differ from the estimated fair value at the acquisition date. A revaluation of the contingent consideration would only be required if there is a significant change to the underlying valuation assumptions. The contingent consideration will be adjusted when the contingency is resolved and the consideration is paid or becomes payable. Any difference between the cash payment and the amount accrued for contingent consideration will result in an adjustment to the product technology intangible asset.
During 2023, we revised our projections of expected revenues and gross profits to be earned from the sale of TheraClear devices. The change in projections was considered significant enough to warrant a revaluation of the contingent consideration. To calculate the fair value of the earnout at December 31, 2023, using Monte Carlo simulations, our projections were utilized to develop expected revenues and gross profits based on the risk inherent in the projections using the Geometric-Brownian motion for the earnout periods and related earnout payments. Significant assumptions used in the Geometric-Brownian motion analysis include projected revenues, projected gross profit, risk free rate of return of 3.8%, revenue volatility of 15.0%, and a cost of equity of 10.0%. The fair value of the contingent consideration as of December 31, 2023 was estimated to be $1.2 million, which resulted in a reduction in contingent consideration of $7.4 million with a corresponding adjustment to the carrying value of the product technology intangible asset. During 2024, there were no further significant changes to our projections of expected revenues and gross profits to be earned from the sale of TheraClear devices and, as such, we did not revalue the contingent consideration. The fair value of the contingent consideration as of December 31, 2024 was estimated to be $1.1 million, and reflects adjustments during the year for royalty and gross profit payments based on gross profit from domestic and international sales.
Goodwill and Intangible Impairments
As of December 31, 2024, we had $2.7 million of goodwill related to the acquisitions of the XTRAC and VTRAC businesses in fiscal 2015. We evaluate the carrying value of goodwill during the fourth quarter of each year and whenever circumstances indicate the carrying value of goodwill may not be recoverable. The determination of the fair value of the reporting units to which the goodwill relates requires management to make estimates and assumptions. We organized our business into two operating segments, which also serve as our goodwill reporting units and are defined as Dermatology Recurring Procedures and Dermatology Procedures Equipment. Our analysis employed the use of both a market and income approach, with the market approach given a 25% weighting and the income approach given a 75% weighting. Significant assumptions used in the income approach include growth and discount rates, profit margins and our weighted average cost of capital. We used historical performance and management estimates of future performance to determine profit margins and growth rates. Discount rates selected for each reporting unit varied. Our weighted average cost of capital included a review and assessment of market and capital structure assumptions. Based on the assessments performed in the fourth quarters of 2024 and 2023 in conjunction with the budgeting process, we recorded impairment charges of $3.9 million and $2.3 million, respectively, related to goodwill, which was the amount of the excess of the carrying value of the Dermatology Recurring Procedures reporting unit over its fair value. The impairments were primarily driven by a decline in projected cash flows, including revenues and profitability. Changes in our actual results and/or estimates or any of our other assumptions used in our analysis could result in a different conclusion.
All of our intangible assets are finite-lived assets, with amortization recorded over the estimated useful life on a straight-line basis. During the year ended December
31, 2023, we recorded a $7.4 million reduction to the carrying value of the product technology intangible asset as a result of the revaluation of contingent consideration related to the purchase of the TheraClear devices. There was no such revaluation of the contingent consideration during the year ended December 31, 2024. As of December 31, 2024, we had $5.3 million of intangible assets. The finite-lived assets are tested for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of the asset group may not be recoverable. Our intangible assets are grouped into five categories: core technology, product technology, customer relationships, trade names and Pharos customer lists. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset group to the undiscounted cash flows attributable to the asset group. If the carrying amount of an asset group exceeds its undiscounted cash flows, an impairment charge is recognized in the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset group exceeds its fair value of the asset group.
Considerable management judgment is necessary to assess recoverable amounts of intangible assets and measure fair value of the intangible assets that were impaired as such measurements involve estimation of future revenues, royalty rates, profit margins and other cash flows. Changes in our actual results and/or estimates or any of our other assumptions used in our analysis could result in a different conclusion.
Sales and Use Taxes
We record state sales tax collected and remitted for our customers on dermatology procedures equipment sales on a net basis, excluded from revenue. Our sales tax expense that is not presently being collected and remitted for the recurring revenue business is recorded in general and administrative expenses within the consolidated statements of operations.
We believe our state sales and use tax accruals have been properly recognized such that, if our arrangements with customers are deemed more likely than not that we would not be exempt from sales tax in a particular state, the basis for measurement of the state sales and use tax is calculated in accordance with ASC 405, Liabilities, as a transaction tax. If and when we are successful in defending ourselves or in settling the sales tax obligation for a lesser amount, the reversal of this liability is to be recorded in the period the settlement is reached. However, the precise scope, timing and time period at issue, as well as the final outcome of any audit and actual settlement, remains uncertain.
In the ordinary course of business, we are, from time to time, subject to audits performed by state taxing authorities. These actions and proceedings are generally based on the position that the arrangements entered into by us are subject to sales and use tax rather than exempt from tax under applicable law. The states of New York and California have assessed us an aggregate of $5.2 million including penalties and interest. The audits cover the period from March 2014 through November 2022. We received notification that an administrative state judge in New York issued an opinion finding in favor of us that the sale of XTRAC treatment codes was not taxable as sales tax with respect to that state’s first assessment. This ruling covers $1.8 million of the total $5.2 million of assessments. The relevant taxing authority filed an appeal of the administrative law judge’s finding and, following the submission of legal briefs by both sides and oral argument held in January 2022, on May 6, 2022, we received a written decision from the State of New York Appeals Tribunal (“Tribunal”) overturning the favorable sales tax determination of the administrative law judge. We appealed the Tribunal’s decision to the New York State Appellate Division (“Appellate Division”), and posted the required appellate bond in the form of cash collateral. Oral argument was held by the Appellate Division on January 18, 2024.
On March 8, 2024, we received a decision from the Appellate Division ruling against us in the matter of our sales tax appeal, affirming the Tribunal's ruling that our sale of XTRAC treatment codes is subject to sales tax. The Appellate Division concluded that, through the usage arrangements, our customers had possession of the laser devices and had a license and ability to use the laser devices. The Appellate Division also agreed with the Tribunal that the primary function analysis was not applicable in this matter. On April 11, 2024, we filed a motion for leave to appeal the Appellate Division’s decision to the New York State Court of Appeals (“Court of Appeals”). On October 22, 2024, in an unsigned one-line decision, the Court of Appeals denied our motion to appeal the Appellate Division ruling. Therefore, the adverse decision stands and New York will execute on the appellate bond we posted for $1.3 million. As of December 31, 2024, we have accrued $1.8 million including penalties and interest as a result of the Appellate Division ruling. We are in the administrative process of appeal with respect to the remaining $1.3 million of assessments in the State of New York. We believe that the Appellate Division ruling provides an avenue for challenging the pending audit periods and subsequent periods, provided we can show that the value of the equipment provided to customers is either incidental to the overall value of the non-taxable services that are provided or should be treated similarly to pharmaceutical treatments, which are generally exempt from sales tax.
The State of California has made aggregate assessments of $2.1 million including penalties and interest. The audits cover the period from June 2018 through June 2022. We are in the administrative process of appeal in this jurisdiction as well.
In those states where we did not or may not prevail in the future with the defenses we have proposed and in the event there is a determination that the true object of our recurring revenue model is not exempt from sales taxes and is not a prescription medicine, or we do not have other defenses where we prevail, we may be subject to sales taxes in those particular states for previous years and in the future, plus potential interest and penalties.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
A description of recently issued accounting pronouncements that may potentially impact our financial position and results of operations is disclosed in Note 2 to our audited financial statements appearing elsewhere in this Annual Report.

---

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
ITEM 7A.
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
We are a smaller reporting company as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act and are not required to provide the information required under this item.

---

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
ITEM 8.
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
The financial statements required by this Item 8 are included in this Annual Report and begin on page.

---

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS
ITEM 9.
CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.

---

ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
ITEM 9A.
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Limitations of Internal Control System
Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, no evaluation of internal control over financial reporting can provide absolute assurance that misstatements due to error or fraud will not occur or that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within our company have been detected. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation. Management does not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures or our internal control over financial reporting will prevent or detect all errors and all fraud.
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Accounting Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures, (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”), as of December 31, 2024. Based on that evaluation, management has concluded that, as of such date, our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective at the reasonable assurance level because of a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting that had not yet been remediated.
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Accounting Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
In designing and evaluating our disclosure controls and procedures, management recognized that disclosure controls and procedures, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the disclosure controls and procedures are met. Additionally, in designing disclosure controls and procedures, our management necessarily was required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible disclosure controls and procedures. The design of any disclosure controls and procedures also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions.
Management's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Our Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act. Our management conducted an assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the framework established in the 2013 Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”). Based on this assessment, our management has determined that our internal control over financial reporting was not effective as of December 31, 2024.
This Annual Report does not include an attestation report of our registered public accounting firm regarding our internal control over financial reporting. We are not required to have, nor have we engaged our independent registered public accounting firm to perform, an audit on our internal control over financial reporting pursuant to the rules of the SEC that permit us to provide only management’s report in this Annual Report.
A material weakness is a control deficiency, or a combination of control deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of our annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.
Management identified a material weakness in our internal controls over financial reporting related to a lack of detailed management review of account reconciliations and account analyses, including those prepared by third-party specialists.
In order to remediate this material weakness, we plan to improve our processes and controls, including senior management review, to achieve accurate financial accounting, reporting and disclosures.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Other than the material weakness discussed above, there has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting in our most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

---

ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 9B.
OTHER INFORMATION
During the three months ended December 31, 2024, none of the directors or officers of the Company adopted or terminated a "Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement" or a "non-Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement," as each term is defined in Item 408 of Regulation S-K.

---

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
ITEM 10.
DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to our Proxy Statement for the 2025 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024.

---

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
ITEM 11.
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to our Proxy Statement for the 2025 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024.

---

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS
ITEM 12.
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to our Proxy Statement for the 2025 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024.

---

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
ITEM 13.
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to our Proxy Statement for the 2025 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024.

---

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES
ITEM 14.
PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES
The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to our Proxy Statement for the 2025 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024.
PART IV

---

ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
ITEM 15.
EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
(a)(1) Financial Statements
Consolidated balance sheets of STRATA Skin Sciences, Inc. and subsidiary as of December 31, 2024 and 2023, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023.
(a)(2) Financial Statement Schedules
None, as all information required in these schedules is included in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
(a)(3) Exhibits
The exhibits listed under subsection (b) of this Item 15 are hereby incorporated by reference.
3.1
Fifth Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 contained in our Registration Statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-258814), as filed on August 13, 2021).
3.2
Certificate of Amendment to Fifth Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as filed June 3, 2024 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 contained in our Current Report on Form 8-K, as filed on June 4, 2024)
3.3
Fourth Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Company (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 contained in our Form 8-K current report as filed on January 8, 2016).
4.1
Specimen Stock Certificate Incorporated by reference to our Registration Statement on Form S-1, as amended (File No. 333-125517), as filed on August 8, 2005).
4.2
Description of Registrant’s Securities (attached hereto)
10.1*
Form of Indemnification Agreement for directors and executive officers. (Incorporated by reference to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013 filed on March 17, 2014).
10.2*
2005 Stock Incentive Plan (Incorporated by reference to our Registration Statement on Form S-1, as amended (File No. 333-125517), filed on August 8, 2005.
10.3*
Form of Incentive Stock Option Agreement. (Incorporated by reference to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015 filed on March 15, 2016)
10.4*
Form of Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement. (Incorporated by reference to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015 filed on March 15, 2016)
10.5*
STRATA Skin Sciences 2016 Omnibus Option Plan. (Incorporated by reference to our Form 10-Q quarterly report for the quarter ended September 30, 2015 filed on November 14, 2016).
10.6
Securities Purchase Agreement dated as of March 30, 2018, between the Company and Accelmed (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 contained in our Current Report on Form 8-K, as filed on April 2, 2018)
10.7
Securities Purchase Agreement dated as of March 30, 2018, between the Company and Broadfin (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 contained in our Current Report on Form 8-K, as filed on April 2, 2018).
10.8
Securities Purchase Agreement dated as of March 30, 2018, between the Company and Sabby (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 contained in our Current Report on Form 8-K, as filed on April 2, 2018).
10.9
Form of Registration Rights Agreement (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 contained in our Current Report on Form 8-K, as filed on April 2, 2018).
10.10
Form of Leak-Out Agreement (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 contained in our Current Report on Form 8-K, as filed on April 2, 2018).
10.11
Form of Subscription Agreement (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 contained in our Current Report on Form 8-K, as filed on April 2, 2018).
10.12*
Amended and Restated Strata Skin Sciences, Inc. 2016 Omnibus Incentive Plan (Incorporated by reference to Appendix A to our Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A, as filed on June 2, 2021).
10.13
Sublease Agreement between Luigi Bormioli Corporation and the Company for office space at 5 Walnut Grove Drive, Horsham, PA 19044 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 contained in our Current Report on Form 8-K, as filed on October 3, 2018).
10.14
Settlement Agreement and Release, dated as of August 10, 2020, between STRATA Skin Sciences, Inc. and Ra Medical Systems, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 11, 2020).
10.15*
Employment Agreement, dated as of March 1, 2021, between Robert Moccia and STRATA Skin Sciences, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 1, 2021).
10.16*
Form of Stock Option Agreement, dated as of March 1, 2021, between Robert Moccia and STRATA Skin Sciences, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 1, 2021).
10.17*
Employment Agreement, dated as of October 4, 2021, between Christopher Lesovitz and STRATA Skin Sciences, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 4, 2021).
10.18
Form of Equity Distribution Agreement, dated October 15, 2021, between STRATA Skin Sciences, Inc. and Ladenburg Thalmann & Co. Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 18, 2021).
10.19*
Form of Management Change of Control Severance Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.79 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021).
10.20
Credit and Security Agreement, dated as of September 30, 2021, as amended January 10, 2022, September 6, 2022 and June 30, 2023, among STRATA Skin Sciences, Inc., MidCap Financial Trust, as administrative agent, and the lenders identified therein. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit A of Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 30, 2023).
10.21
Intellectual Property Security Agreement, dated as of September 30, 2021, between STRATA Skin Sciences, Inc. and MidCap Financial Trust. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 4, 2021).
10.22
Amended and Restated Warrant Agreement to Purchase Shares of the Common Stock of STRATA Skin Sciences, Inc., dated as of June 30, 2023, between STRATA Skin Sciences, Inc. and MidCap Funding XXVII Trust (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 6, 2023).
10.23
Amended and Restated Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of June 30, 2023, between STRATA Skin Sciences, Inc. and MidCap Funding XXVII Trust (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 6, 2023).
10.24
Amendment No. 3 to Credit and Security Agreement, dated as of June 30, 2023, among STRATA Skin Sciences, Inc., MidCap Financial Trust, as administrative agent, and the lenders identified therein (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 30, 2023).
10.25
Amendment No. 4 to Credit and Security Agreement, dated as of February 20, 2024, among STRATA Skin Sciences, Inc., MidCap Financial Trust, as administrative agent, and the lenders identified therein (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 21, 2024)
10.26
Amendment No. 5 to Credit and Security Agreement, dated as of March 27, 2024, among STRATA Skin Sciences, Inc., MidCap Financial Trust, as administrative agent, and the lenders identified therein (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.26 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2023)
10.27
Asset Purchase Agreement, dated as of January 10, 2022, between STRATA Skin Sciences, Inc., Theravant Corporation and certain other parties thereto (incorporated by reference as Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 10, 2022).
10.28
Form of Development Agreement by and between Theravant Corporation and STRATA Skin Sciences, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2022).
10.29
Asset Purchase Agreement, dated as of August 16, 2021, between STRATA Skin Sciences, Inc. and Ra Medical Systems, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 17, 2021).
10.30*
Form of Performance Stock Option Agreement (Non-Qualified Stock Option) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2022).
10.31*
Form of VWAP Performance Stock Option Agreement (Non-Qualified Stock Option) (incorporated by referenced to Exhibit 10.4 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2022)
10.32
Letter Agreement, dated as of June 30, 2023, between STRATA Skin Sciences, Inc. and MidCap Financial Trust, as administrative agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 6, 2023).
10.33
Intellectual Property Security Agreement Supplement, dated July 5, 2023, between STRATA Skin Sciences, Inc. and MidCap Financial Trust (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2023)
10.34
Employment Separation Agreement and Release, dated as of October 30, 2023, between Robert Moccia and STRATA Skin Sciences, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 30, 2023).
10.35
Employment Agreement, dated as of October 30, 2023, between Dolev Rafaeli and STRATA Skin Sciences, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 30, 2023).
10.36
Form of Stock Option Agreement between Dolev Rafaeli and STRATA Skin Sciences, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 30, 2023).
10.37
Retention Agreement, dated October 30, 2023, between Chris Lesovitz and STRATA Skin Sciences, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 30, 2023).
10.38
Letter agreement, dated as of February 20, 2024, between STRATA Skin Sciences, Inc. and MidCap Financial Trust, as administrative agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 21, 2024).
Insider Trading Policy (attached hereto)
23.1
Consent of Marcum, LLP
31.1
Rule 13a-14(a) Certificate of Chief Executive Officer
31.2
Rule 13a-14(a) Certificate of Chief Accounting Officer
32.1**
Certifications of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Accounting Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
99.1
STRATA Skin Sciences, Inc. Clawback Policy (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.39 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2023)
*
Indicates management contract or compensatory plan
**
The certifications attached as Exhibit 32.1 accompany this Annual Report on Form 10-K pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not be deemed “filed” by the Registrant for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.