EDGAR 10-K Filing

Company CIK: 1482430
Filing Year: 2022
Filename: 1482430_10-K_2022_0001482430-22-000016.json

---

ITEM 1. BUSINESS
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
Overview
KBS Real Estate Investment Trust III, Inc. (the “Company”) is a Maryland corporation that has elected to be taxed as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) and it intends to continue to operate in such a manner. As used herein, the terms “we,” “our” and “us” refer to the Company and as required by context, KBS Limited Partnership III, a Delaware limited partnership, which we refer to as our “Operating Partnership,” and to their subsidiaries. We conduct our business primarily through our Operating Partnership, of which we are the sole general partner.
We have invested in a diverse portfolio of real estate investments. As of December 31, 2021, we owned 16 office properties, one mixed-use office/retail property and an investment in the equity securities of a Singapore real estate investment trust (the “SREIT”).
We commenced our initial public offering on October 26, 2010, the primary portion of which terminated in July 2015. KBS Capital Markets Group LLC served as dealer manager for the offering. We sold 169,006,162 shares of common stock in our now-terminated primary initial public offering for gross offering proceeds of $1.7 billion. As of December 31, 2021, we had also sold 40,819,751 shares of common stock under our dividend reinvestment plan for gross offering proceeds of $421.7 million. Also as of December 31, 2021, we had redeemed or repurchased 64,674,823 shares sold in our initial public offering for $687.9 million.
Additionally, on October 3, 2014, we issued 258,462 shares of common stock, for $2.4 million, in private transactions exempt from the registration requirements pursuant to Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933.
We continue to offer shares of common stock under our dividend reinvestment plan. In some states, we will need to renew the registration statement annually or file a new registration statement to continue the dividend reinvestment plan offering. We may terminate our dividend reinvestment plan offering at any time.
Our conflicts committee and our board of directors continue to evaluate various alternatives available to us, including whether or not to convert to an “NAV REIT.” Our conflicts committee and board of directors remain focused on providing stable distributions and enhanced liquidity to stockholders. In the near term, while our conflicts committee and board of directors explore alternatives available to us, we may market certain of our assets for sale. Based on our assessment of alternatives available to us, market conditions and our further assessment of our capital raising prospects, our conflicts committee and board of directors may conclude that it would be in the best interest of our stockholders to (i) convert to an “NAV REIT,” (ii) continue to operate as a going concern under our current business plan, or (iii) adopt a plan of liquidation that would involve the sale of our remaining assets (in which event such plan would be presented to stockholders for approval). There is no assurance that any alternative being considered by our board of directors will provide a return to stockholders that equals or exceeds our estimated value per share as of November 1, 2021, and although we remain focused on providing enhanced liquidity to stockholders while maximizing returns to stockholders, we can provide no assurances in this regard. We also can provide no assurances as to whether or when any alternative being considered by our board of directors will be consummated. See Part I, Item 1A, “Risk Factors” and Part III, Item 13, “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director Independence - Report of the Conflicts Committee - Certain Transactions with Related Persons.”
Section 5.11 of our charter requires that we seek stockholder approval of our liquidation if our shares of common stock are not listed on a national securities exchange by September 30, 2020, unless a majority of the conflicts committee of our board of directors, composed solely of all of our independent directors, determines that liquidation is not then in the best interest of our stockholders. Pursuant to our charter requirement, the conflicts committee assessed our portfolio of investments, and with consideration of the then current market conditions, including the uncertainty as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic and lack of liquidity in the marketplace, as well as our conflicts committee’s and board of directors’ continuing review and evaluation of various alternatives available to us, on August 30, 2021, our conflicts committee unanimously determined to postpone approval of our liquidation. Section 5.11 of our charter requires that the conflicts committee revisit the issue of liquidation at least annually. At our annual meeting of stockholders held on May 7, 2020, our stockholders approved the removal of Section 5.11 of our charter. As set forth in the proxy statement for our annual meeting of stockholders, implementation of this amendment to our charter and our conversion to an NAV REIT remain subject to further approval of our conflicts committee.
As our advisor, KBS Capital Advisors manages our day-to-day operations and our portfolio of real estate investments. KBS Capital Advisors makes recommendations on all investments to our board of directors. All proposed investments must be approved by at least a majority of our board of directors, including a majority of the conflicts committee. Unless otherwise provided by our charter, the conflicts committee may approve a proposed investment without action by the full board of directors if the approving members of the conflicts committee constitute at least a majority of the board of directors. KBS Capital Advisors also provides asset-management, disposition, marketing, investor-relations and other administrative services on our behalf. Our advisor owns 20,857 shares of our common stock. We have no paid employees.
Objectives and Strategies
Our primary investment objectives are to preserve and return our stockholders’ capital contributions and to provide our stockholders with attractive and stable cash distributions. We will also seek to realize growth in the value of our investments by timing asset sales to maximize asset value.
2021 Portfolio Highlights
On January 19, 2021, we completed the sale of Anchor Centre to a purchaser unaffiliated with us or our advisor, for $103.5 million, before third-party closing costs, closing credits and disposition fees payable to our advisor. We recognized a gain on sale of $20.5 million related to this disposition.
On November 2, 2021, we completed the sale of Domain Gateway to a purchaser unaffiliated with us or our advisor, for $143.0 million, before third-party closing costs, closing credits and disposition fees payable to our advisor. In connection with the disposition of Domain Gateway, we paid down $69.7 million of principal balance due under the Modified Portfolio Revolving Loan Facility. We recognized a gain on sale of $93.9 million related to this disposition.
In connection with our sale of 11 properties to the SREIT on July 18, 2019 (the “Singapore Portfolio”), on July 19, 2019, we, through an indirect wholly owned subsidiary (“REIT Properties III”), acquired 307,953,999 units in the SREIT (SGX-ST Ticker: OXMU) at a price of $0.88 per unit representing a 33.3% ownership interest in the SREIT (the “Singapore Transaction”). On August 21, 2019, REIT Properties III sold 18,392,100 of its units in the SREIT for $16.2 million pursuant to an over-allotment option granted to the underwriters of the SREIT’s offering, reducing REIT Properties III’s ownership in the SREIT to 31.3% of the outstanding units of the SREIT. On November 9, 2021, REIT Properties III sold 73,720,000 units in the SREIT for $58.9 million, net of fees and costs, pursuant to a block trade, reducing REIT Properties III’s ownership in the SREIT to 18.5% of the outstanding units of the SREIT as of that date. As of December 31, 2021, REIT Properties III held 215,841,899 units of the SREIT, which represented 18.5% of the outstanding units of the SREIT as of that date. As of December 31, 2021, the aggregate book value and fair value of our investment in the units of the SREIT was $180.2 million, which was based on the closing price of the SREIT units on the Singapore Exchange Securities Trading Limited (the “SGX-ST”) of $0.835 per unit as of December 31, 2021 and did not take into account any potential discount for the holding period risk due to the quantity of units we own.
On November 9, 2021, upon our sale of 73,720,000 units in the SREIT, we determined that based on our ownership interest of 18.5% of the outstanding units of the SREIT, we no longer have significant influence over the operations, financial policies and decision making with respect to the SREIT. Accordingly, effective November 9, 2021, our investment in the units of the SREIT represents an investment in marketable securities and is therefore presented at fair value at each reporting date based on the closing price of the SREIT units on the SGX-ST on that date. During the period from November 9, 2021 through December 31, 2021, we recorded an unrealized gain on real estate equity securities of $16.8 million.
Real Estate Portfolio
We have acquired and manage a diverse portfolio of core real estate properties, which are generally lower risk, existing properties with at least 80% occupancy. Our primary investment focus has been core office properties located throughout the United States, though we have and may in the future invest in other types of properties and real estate-related investments. Our core property focus in the U.S. office sector has reflected a more value-creating core strategy, which is also known as a core-plus strategy. In many cases, these properties have slightly higher (10% to 20%) vacancy rates and/or higher near-term lease rollover at acquisition than more conservative value-maintaining core properties. These characteristics may provide us with opportunities to lease space at higher rates, especially in markets with increasing absorption, or to re-lease space in these properties at higher rates, bringing below-market rates of in-place expiring leases up to market rates. Many of these properties have required or will require a moderate level of additional investment for capital expenditures and tenant improvement costs in order to improve or rebrand the properties and increase rental rates. Thus, we believe these properties provide an opportunity for us to achieve more significant capital appreciation by increasing occupancy, negotiating new leases with higher rental rates and/or executing enhancement projects.
The primary types of office properties we intend to invest in include low-rise, mid-rise and high-rise office buildings and office parks in urban and suburban locations, especially those that are in or near central business districts or have access to transportation. In addition, we may consider acquiring industrial properties (including warehouse and distribution facilities, office/warehouse flex properties, research and development properties and light industrial properties) and retail properties. Although this is our primary investment focus, we may make adjustments to our investment focus based on real estate market conditions and investment opportunities.
We will generally hold fee title to or a long-term leasehold estate in the properties we acquire. We may also invest in or acquire operating companies or other entities that own and operate assets that meet our investment objectives. We will make investments in other entities when we consider it more efficient to acquire an entity that already owns assets meeting our investment objectives than to acquire such assets directly. We have also made investments through joint ventures, and in the future we may enter into other joint ventures, partnerships and co-ownership arrangements (including preferred equity investments) or participations for the purpose of obtaining interests in real estate properties and for the development or improvement of properties.
Our advisor develops a well-defined exit strategy for each investment we make and periodically performs a hold-sell analysis on each asset. These periodic analyses focus on the remaining available value enhancement opportunities for the asset, the demand for the asset in the marketplace, market conditions and our overall portfolio objectives to determine if the sale of the asset, whether via an individual sale or as part of a portfolio sale or merger, would generate a favorable return to our stockholders. Economic and market conditions may influence us to hold our assets for different periods of time. We may sell an asset before the end of the expected holding period if we believe that market conditions and asset positioning have maximized its value to us or the sale of the asset would otherwise be in the best interests of our stockholders.
We may make adjustments to our target portfolio based on real estate market conditions and investment opportunities. We will not forego a good investment because it does not precisely fit our expected portfolio composition. We believe that we are most likely to meet our investment objectives through the careful selection and underwriting of assets. When making an acquisition, we will emphasize the performance and risk characteristics of that investment, how that investment will fit with our portfolio-level performance objectives, the other assets in our portfolio and how the returns and risks of that investment compare to the returns and risks of available investment alternatives. Thus, to the extent that our advisor presents us with what we believe to be good investment opportunities that allow us to meet the REIT requirements under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Internal Revenue Code”), our portfolio composition may vary from what we currently expect. In fact, we may invest in whatever types of real estate or real estate-related assets we believe are in our best interests. However, we will attempt to construct a portfolio that produces stable and attractive returns by spreading risk across different real estate investments.
Also, in connection with the Singapore Transaction, our board of directors and conflicts committee adopted the asset Allocation Process proposed by our advisor and KBS Realty Advisors. See Part I, Item 1A of this Annual Report, “Risk Factors- Our advisor and its affiliates face conflicts of interest relating to the acquisition of assets, the leasing of properties and the disposition of properties due to their relationship with other KBS-sponsored programs and/or KBS-advised investors, which could result in decisions that are not in our best interest or the best interests of our stockholders.”
We acquired our first real estate property on September 29, 2011. As of December 31, 2021, our portfolio of real estate properties was composed of 16 office properties and one mixed-use office/retail property. For more information on our real estate investments, including tenant information, see Part I, Item 2 “Properties.” We also own an investment in the equity securities of the SREIT. See “-2021 Portfolio Highlights” above.
The following charts illustrate the geographic diversification of our real estate properties based on total leased square feet and total annualized base rent as of December 31, 2021:
Leased Square Feet
Annualized Base Rent (1)
_____________________
(1) Annualized base rent represents annualized contractual base rental income as of December 31, 2021, adjusted to straight-line any contractual tenant concessions (including free rent), rent increases and rent decreases from the lease’s inception through the balance of the lease term.
We have a stable tenant base and we have tried to diversify our tenant base in order to limit exposure to any one tenant or industry. Our top ten tenants leasing space in our real estate portfolio represented approximately 25% of our total annualized base rent as of December 31, 2021. The chart below illustrates the diversity of tenant industries in our real estate portfolio based on total annualized base rent as of December 31, 2021:
Annualized Base Rent (1)
_____________________
(1) Annualized base rent represents annualized contractual base rental income as of December 31, 2021, adjusted to straight-line any contractual tenant concessions (including free rent), rent increases and rent decreases from the lease’s inception through the balance of the lease term.
* “Other” includes any industry less than 3% of total.
Financing Objectives
We financed our real estate acquisitions to date with a combination of the proceeds received from our now-terminated initial public offering and debt. We may use proceeds from borrowings to finance acquisitions of new real estate and real estate-related investments; to pay for property improvements, repairs and tenant build-outs to properties and for other capital expenditures; to refinance existing indebtedness; to pay distributions; to fund the redemption or repurchase of our shares; or to provide working capital. Our investment strategy is to utilize primarily secured debt to finance our investment portfolio, though from time to time we may also use unsecured debt.
We expect to continue to borrow funds at fixed and variable rates. As of December 31, 2021, we had debt obligations in the aggregate principal amount of $1.5 billion, with a weighted-average remaining term of 1.8 years. The maturity dates of certain loans may be extended beyond their current maturity dates, subject to certain terms and conditions contained in the loan documents. As of December 31, 2021, we did not have any debt maturing during the 12 months ending December 31, 2022. We plan to exercise our extension options available under our loan agreements or pay down or refinance the related notes payable prior to their maturity dates. As of December 31, 2021, our debt obligations consisted of $123.0 million of fixed rate notes payable and $1.3 billion of variable rate notes payable. As of December 31, 2021, the interest rates on $1.1 billion of our variable rate notes payable were effectively fixed through interest rate swap agreements. The interest rate and weighted-average effective interest rate of our fixed rate debt and variable rate debt as of December 31, 2021 were 3.7% and 3.2%, respectively. The weighted-average effective interest rate represents the actual interest rate in effect as of December 31, 2021 (consisting of the contractual interest rate and the effect of interest rate swaps, if applicable), using interest rate indices as of December 31, 2021, where applicable. As of December 31, 2021, we had $312.3 million of revolving debt available for future disbursement under various loans, subject to certain conditions set forth in the loan agreements.
We have tried to spread the maturity dates of our debt to minimize maturity and refinance risk in our portfolio. In addition, a majority of our debt allows us to extend the maturity dates, subject to certain conditions contained in the applicable loan documents. Although we believe we will satisfy the conditions to extend the maturity of our debt obligations, we can give no assurance in this regard. The following table shows the current maturities, including principal amortization payments, of our debt obligations as of December 31, 2021 (in thousands):
2022 $ 1,013
2023 1,100,067
2024 371,210
2025 -
2026 -
Thereafter -
$ 1,472,290
We expect that our debt financing and other liabilities will be between 45% and 65% of the cost of our tangible assets (before deducting depreciation and other non-cash reserves). There is no limitation on the amount we may borrow for the purchase of any single asset. We limit our total liabilities to 75% of the cost of our tangible assets (before deducting depreciation and other non-cash reserves) meaning that our borrowings and other liabilities may exceed our maximum target leverage of 65% of the cost of our tangible assets without violating these borrowing restrictions. We may exceed the 75% limit only if a majority of the conflicts committee approves each borrowing in excess of this limitation and we disclose such borrowings to our stockholders in our next quarterly report with an explanation from the conflicts committee of the justification for the excess borrowing. To the extent financing in excess of this limit is available on attractive terms, the conflicts committee may approve debt in excess of this limit. From time to time, our total liabilities could also be below 45% of the cost of our tangible assets due to the lack of availability of debt financing. As of December 31, 2021, our borrowings and other liabilities were approximately 54% of both the cost (before deducting depreciation and other noncash reserves) and book value (before deducting depreciation) of our tangible assets.
Economic Dependency
We are dependent on our advisor for certain services that are essential to us, including the identification, evaluation, negotiation, acquisition or origination and disposition of investments; management of the daily operations and leasing of our portfolio; and other general and administrative responsibilities. In the event that our advisor is unable to provide these services, we will be required to obtain such services from other sources.
Competitive Market Factors
The U.S. commercial real estate investment and leasing markets remain competitive. We face competition from various entities for investment and disposition opportunities, for prospective tenants and to retain our current tenants, including other REITs, pension funds, insurance companies, investment funds and companies, partnerships and developers. Many of these entities have substantially greater financial resources than we do and may be able to accept more risk than we can prudently manage, including risks with respect to the creditworthiness of a tenant or the geographic location of their investments. Competition from these entities may reduce the number of suitable investment opportunities offered to us or increase the bargaining power of property owners seeking to sell. Further, as a result of their greater resources, those entities may have more flexibility than we do in their ability to offer rental concessions to attract and retain tenants. This could put pressure on our ability to maintain or raise rents and could adversely affect our ability to attract or retain tenants. In addition, the COVID-19 pandemic caused many tenants to re-evaluate their space needs, resulting in a significant increase in sublease space available in the office market from tenants wanting to unload un-needed space. We face competition from these tenants, who may be more willing to offer significant discounts to prospective subtenants. As a result, our financial condition, results of operations, cash flow, ability to satisfy our debt service obligations and ability to pay distributions to our stockholders may be adversely affected.
We also face competition from many of the types of entities referenced above regarding the disposition of properties. These entities may possess properties in similar locations and/or of the same property types as ours and may be attempting to dispose of these properties at the same time we are attempting to dispose of some of our properties, providing potential purchasers with a larger number of properties from which to choose and potentially decreasing the sales price for such properties. Additionally, these entities may be willing to accept a lower return on their individual investments, which could further reduce the sales price of such properties.
This competition could decrease the sales proceeds we receive for properties that we sell, assuming we are able to sell such properties, which could adversely affect our cash flows and the overall return for our stockholders.
Although we believe that we are well-positioned to compete effectively in each facet of our business, there is enormous competition in our market sector and there can be no assurance that we will compete effectively or that we will not encounter increased competition in the future that could limit our ability to conduct our business effectively.
Compliance with Federal, State and Local Environmental Law
Under various federal, state and local environmental laws, ordinances and regulations, a current or previous real property owner or operator may be liable for the cost of removing or remediating hazardous or toxic substances on, under or in such property. These costs could be substantial. Such laws often impose liability whether or not the owner or operator knew of, or was responsible for, the presence of such hazardous or toxic substances. Environmental laws also may impose liens on property or restrictions on the manner in which property may be used or businesses may be operated, and these restrictions may require substantial expenditures or prevent us from entering into leases with prospective tenants that may be impacted by such laws. Environmental laws provide for sanctions for noncompliance and may be enforced by governmental agencies or, in certain circumstances, by private parties. Certain environmental laws and common law principles could be used to impose liability for the release of and exposure to hazardous substances, including asbestos-containing materials and lead-based paint. Third parties may seek recovery from real property owners or operators for personal injury or property damage associated with exposure to released hazardous substances and governments may seek recovery for natural resource damage. The costs of defending against claims of environmental liability, of complying with environmental regulatory requirements, of remediating any contaminated property, or of paying personal injury, property damage or natural resource damage claims could reduce our cash available for distribution to our stockholders. All of our real estate properties are subject to Phase I environmental assessments prior to the time they are acquired.
Industry Segments
We invested in core real estate properties and real estate-related investments with the goal of acquiring a portfolio of income-producing investments. Our real estate properties exhibit similar long-term financial performance and have similar economic characteristics to each other. Accordingly, we aggregated our investments in real estate properties into one reportable business segment.
Human Capital
We have no paid employees. The employees of our advisor or its affiliates provide management, acquisition, disposition, advisory and certain administrative services for us.
Principal Executive Office
Our principal executive offices are located at 800 Newport Center Drive, Suite 700, Newport Beach, California 92660. Our telephone number, general facsimile number and website address are (949) 417-6500, (949) 417-6501 and www.kbsreitiii.com, respectively.
Available Information
Access to copies of our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, proxy statements and other filings with the SEC, including amendments to such filings, may be obtained free of charge from the following website, www.kbsreitiii.com, or through the SEC’s website, www.sec.gov. These filings are available promptly after we file them with, or furnish them to, the SEC.

---

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
The following are some of the risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those presented in our forward-looking statements. The risks and uncertainties described below are not the only ones we face but do represent those risks and uncertainties that we believe are material to us. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we currently deem immaterial may also harm our business.
Risks Related to an Investment in Our Common Stock
There is no public trading market for the shares of our common stock and we do not anticipate that there will be a public trading market for our shares; therefore, it will be difficult for our stockholders to sell their shares and, if they are able to sell their shares, they will likely sell them at a substantial discount to the public offering price and the estimated value per share.
Our charter does not require our directors to seek stockholder approval to liquidate our assets and dissolve by a specified date, nor does our charter require our directors to list our shares for trading on a national securities exchange by a specified date. There is no public market for our shares and we have no plans at this time to list our shares on a national securities exchange. Until our shares are listed, if ever, our stockholders may not sell their shares unless the buyer meets the applicable suitability and minimum purchase standards. Any sale must comply with applicable state and federal securities laws. Our charter prohibits the ownership of more than 9.8% of our stock by any person, unless exempted by our board of directors, which may inhibit large investors from desiring to purchase our stockholders’ shares.
We have a share redemption program that may enable stockholders to sell their shares to us in limited circumstances. The restrictions of our share redemption program will limit our stockholders’ ability to sell their shares should they require liquidity and will limit our stockholders’ ability to recover an amount equal to our estimated value per share. In December 2019, our board of directors determined to temporarily suspend Ordinary Redemptions (defined below) under the share redemption program, and Ordinary Redemptions remain suspended through June 30, 2021. Ordinary Redemptions are all redemptions other than those that qualify for the special provisions for redemptions sought in connection with a stockholder’s death, “Qualifying Disability” or “Determination of Incompetence” (each as defined in the share redemption program and, together, “Special Redemptions”). Further, on June 3, 2021, we announced that, in connection with the approval of a self-tender offer, our board of directors had approved a temporary suspension of all redemptions under the share redemption program, including Special Redemptions. On July 14, 2021, our board of directors approved an amended and restated share redemption program (the “Amended Share Redemption Program”) and Ordinary Redemptions and Special Redemptions under the Amended Share Redemption Program resumed effective for the July 30, 2021 redemption date.
Our board of directors may amend, suspend or terminate our share redemption program upon ten business days’ notice to stockholders, and consistent with SEC guidance and interpretations, we may increase or decrease the funding available for the redemption of shares pursuant to our share redemption program upon ten business days’ notice. We describe the restrictions of our share redemption program in detail under Part II, Item 5, “Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities - Amended and Restated Share Redemption Program.” As of March 1, 2022, we had $17.4 million available for redemptions for the remainder of 2022 under the share redemption program, including the reserve for Special Redemptions. We cannot predict future redemption demand with any certainty. If future redemption requests exceed the amount of funding available under our share redemption program, the number of rejected redemption requests will increase over time. See “- Risks Related to Our Corporate Structure - Our stockholders may not be able to sell their shares under our share redemption program and, if our stockholders are able to sell their shares under the current share redemption program, they may not be able to recover an amount equal to the estimated value per share of our common stock.”
Therefore, it will be difficult for our stockholders to sell their shares promptly or at all. If our stockholders are able to sell their shares, they will likely have to sell them at a substantial discount to their public offering price or the estimated value per share. It is also likely that our stockholders’ shares will not be accepted as the primary collateral for a loan. Investors should purchase shares in our dividend reinvestment plan only as a long-term investment and be prepared to hold them for an indefinite period of time because of the illiquid nature of our shares.
We face significant competition for tenants and in the acquisition and disposition of real estate, which may limit our ability to achieve our investment objectives or pay distributions.
The U.S. commercial real estate investment and leasing markets remain competitive. We face competition from various entities for investment and disposition opportunities, for prospective tenants and to retain our current tenants, including other REITs, pension funds, banks and insurance companies, investment funds and companies, partnerships and developers. Many of these entities have substantially greater financial resources than we do and may be able to accept more risk than we can prudently manage, including risks with respect to the creditworthiness of a tenant or the geographic location of their investments.
We depend upon the performance of our property managers in the selection of tenants and negotiation of leasing arrangements. The U.S. commercial real estate industry has created increased pressure on real estate investors and their property managers to find new tenants and keep existing tenants. In order to do so, we have offered and may have to offer inducements, such as free rent and tenant improvements, to compete for attractive tenants. Further, as a result of their greater resources, the entities referenced above may have more flexibility than we do in their ability to offer rental concessions to attract and retain tenants, which could put additional pressure on our ability to maintain or raise rents and could adversely affect our ability to attract or retain tenants. In addition, the COVID-19 pandemic caused many tenants to re-evaluate their space needs, resulting in a significant increase in sublease space available in the office market from tenants wanting to unload un-needed space. We face competition from these tenants, who may be more willing to offer significant discounts to prospective subtenants. Our investors must rely entirely on the management abilities of our advisor, the property managers our advisor selects and the oversight of our board of directors. In the event we are unable to find new tenants and keep existing tenants, or if we are forced to offer significant inducements to such tenants, we may not be able to meet our investment objectives and our financial condition, results of operations, cash flow, ability to satisfy our debt service obligations and ability to pay distributions to our stockholders may be adversely affected.
We face competition from these same entities for real estate investment opportunities. Competition from these entities may reduce the number of suitable investment opportunities offered to us or increase the bargaining power of property owners seeking to sell. Disruptions and dislocations in the credit markets could impact the cost and availability of debt to finance real estate investments, which is a key component of our acquisition strategy. A downturn in the credit market and a potential lack of available debt could result in a further reduction of suitable investment opportunities and create a competitive advantage for other entities that have greater financial resources than we do. In addition, the number of entities and the amount of funds competing for suitable investments may increase. We can give no assurance that our advisor will be successful in obtaining additional suitable investments on financially attractive terms or that, if our advisor makes investments on our behalf, our objectives will be achieved. If we acquire investments at higher prices and/or by using less-than-ideal capital structures, our returns may be lower and the value of our assets may not appreciate or may decrease significantly below the amount we paid for such assets. If such events occur, our stockholders may experience a lower return on their investment.
We also face competition from many of the types of entities referenced above regarding the disposition of properties. These entities may possess properties in similar locations and/or of the same property types as ours and may be attempting to dispose of these properties at the same time we are attempting to dispose of some of our properties, providing potential purchasers with a larger number of properties from which to choose and potentially decreasing the sales price for such properties. Additionally, these entities may be willing to accept a lower return on their individual investments, which could further reduce the sales price of such properties. This competition could decrease the sales proceeds we receive for properties that we sell, assuming we are able to sell such properties, which could adversely affect our cash flows and the overall return for our stockholders.
Although we believe that we are well-positioned to compete effectively in each facet of our business, there is enormous competition in our market sector and there can be no assurance that we will compete effectively or that we will not encounter increased competition in the future that could limit our ability to conduct our business effectively.
Disruptions in the financial markets and uncertain economic conditions could adversely affect market rental rates and commercial real estate values and our ability to refinance or secure debt financing, service future debt obligations, or pay distributions to our stockholders.
Disruptions in the financial markets and uncertain economic conditions (including financial market disruptions related to COVID-19) could adversely affect the values of our investments. Any disruption to the debt and capital markets could result in fewer buyers seeking to acquire commercial properties and possible increases in capitalization rates and lower property values. Furthermore, any decline in economic conditions could negatively impact commercial real estate fundamentals and result in lower occupancy, lower rental rates and declining values in our real estate portfolio, which could have the following negative effects on us:
•the values of our real estate properties could decrease below the amounts paid for such properties; and/or
•revenues from our properties could decrease due to fewer tenants and/or lower rental rates, making it more difficult for us to pay distributions or meet our debt service obligations on debt financing.
All of these factors could reduce our stockholders’ return and decrease the value of an investment in us.
We have relied on debt financing to finance our real estate properties and we may have difficulty refinancing some of our debt obligations prior to or at maturity or we may not be able to refinance these obligations at terms as favorable as the terms of our existing indebtedness. We also may be unable to obtain additional debt financing on attractive terms or at all. If we are not able to refinance our existing indebtedness on attractive terms at the various maturity dates, we may be forced to dispose of some of our assets. Market conditions can change quickly, which could negatively impact the value of our assets and may interfere with the implementation of our business strategy and/or force us to modify it.
The COVID-19 pandemic or any future pandemic, epidemic or outbreak of infectious disease could have material and adverse effects on our or our tenants’ business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows, the markets and communities in which we and our tenants operate and our investment in the SREIT.
The COVID-19 pandemic has had, and another pandemic in the future could have, repercussions across regional and global economies and financial markets. The spread of COVID-19 in many countries, including the United States, has significantly adversely impacted global economic activity and has contributed to significant volatility in financial markets. The global impact of the pandemic has been rapidly evolving and many countries, states and localities, including states and localities in the United States, have reacted by restricting many business and travel activities, mandating the partial or complete closures of certain businesses and schools and taking other actions to mitigate the spread of the virus, most of which have a disruptive effect on economic activity, including the use of and demand for office space. Many private businesses, including some of our tenants, continue to recommend or mandate some or all of their employees work from home or are rotating employees in and out of the office to encourage social distancing in the workplace. Due to these events, during 2021, the usage of our assets remained lower than pre-pandemic levels. In addition, we experienced a significant reduction in leasing interest and activity when compared to pre-pandemic levels.
We cannot predict when, if and to what extent these restrictions and other actions will end and when, if and to what extent economic activity, including the use of and demand for office space, will return to pre-pandemic levels. Even after the pandemic has ceased to be active, the prevalence of work-from-home policies during the pandemic may alter tenant preferences in the long-term with respect to the demand for leasing office space.
The COVID-19 pandemic or any future pandemic, epidemic or outbreak of infectious disease affecting states or regions in which we or our tenants operate could have material and adverse effects on our business, financial condition, results of operations, liquidity and estimated share value due to, among other factors:
•health or other government authorities requiring the closure of offices or other businesses or instituting quarantines of personnel as the result of, or in order to avoid, exposure to a contagious disease;
•businesses evolving to make work-from-home environments, such as employee telecommuting, flexible work schedules, open workplaces or teleconferencing, increasingly common, which could over time erode the overall demand for office space and, in turn, place downward pressure on occupancy, rental rates and property valuations at our properties;
•disruption in supply and delivery chains;
•a general decline in business activity and demand for real estate, especially office properties;
•reduced economic activity, general economic decline or recession, which may impact our tenants’ businesses, financial condition and liquidity and may cause tenants to be unable to make rent payments to us timely, or at all, or to otherwise seek modifications of lease obligations;
•difficulty accessing debt and equity capital on attractive terms, or at all, and a severe disruption and instability in the global financial markets or deteriorations in credit and financing conditions, which may affect our access to capital necessary to fund business operations or replace or renew maturing liabilities on a timely basis, and may negatively affect the valuation of financial assets and liabilities, any of which could affect our ability to meet liquidity and capital expenditure requirements or have a negative effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows;
•our inability to deploy capital due to slower transaction volume, which may be dilutive to stockholders; and
•the potential negative impact on the health of our advisor’s personnel, particularly if a significant number of our advisor’s employees are impacted, and the difficulty in recruiting, attracting and retaining skilled personnel to the extent our advisor’s personnel are impacted, which would result in a deterioration in our ability to ensure business continuity during a disruption.
The ultimate impact of the COVID-19 pandemic or a similar health epidemic is highly uncertain and subject to change. We do not yet know the full extent of potential impacts on our business and operations, our tenants’ businesses and operations, our investment in the units of the SREIT or the global economy as a whole.
During the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, we did not experience significant disruptions in our operations from the COVID-19 pandemic. Many of our tenants have suffered reductions in revenue since March 2020. Rent collections for the quarter ended December 31, 2021 were approximately 99%. We have granted a number of lease concessions related to the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic but these lease concessions did not have a material impact to our consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2021 or consolidated statements of operations for the year ended December 31, 2021. As of December 31, 2021, we had entered into lease amendments related to the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, granting $4.2 million of rent deferrals for the period from March 2020 through September 2021 and granting $2.9 million in rental abatements.
As of December 31, 2021, 81 tenants were granted rental deferrals, rental abatements and/or rent restructures, of which 49 of these tenants have begun to pay rent in accordance with their lease agreements subsequent to the deferral and/or abatement period, six of these tenants early terminated their leases and eight of these tenant leases were modified at lower rental rates and/or based on a percentage of the tenant’s gross receipts. As of December 31, 2021, two of the 81 tenants continue to be in the rental deferral and/or rental abatement periods as granted in accordance with their agreements. Through December 31, 2021, $2.8 million of rent previously deferred has been billed to the tenants, of which $2.4 million was collected.
As of December 31, 2021, we had $1.4 million of receivables for lease payments that had been deferred as lease concessions related to the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, of which $1.1 million was reserved for payments not probable of collection, which were included in rent and other receivables, net on the accompanying consolidated balance sheet. For the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, we recorded $1.2 million and $1.5 million, respectively, of rental abatements granted to tenants as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. Subsequent to December 31, 2021, we have not seen a material impact on our rent collections. We are in discussions with several retail tenants to extend additional short-term deferrals. We will continue to evaluate any additional short-term rent relief requests from tenants on an individual basis. Not all tenant requests will ultimately result in modified agreements, nor are we forgoing our contractual rights under our lease agreements. In most cases, it is in our best interest to help our tenants remain in business and reopen when restrictions are lifted. Current collections and rent relief requests to date may not be indicative of collections or requests in any future period.
We may also need to recognize additional impairment charges at our properties to the extent rental projections continue to decline at our properties. During the year ended December 31, 2020, we recognized an impairment charge of $19.9 million for an office/retail property due to the continued deterioration of retail demand at the property which was further impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic.
We have also made a significant investment in the common units of the SREIT. Since early March 2020, the trading price of the common units of the SREIT has experienced substantial volatility; however, the units have recovered a portion of their losses since the low in March 2020. As of December 31, 2021, the aggregate value of our investment in the units of the SREIT was $180.2 million, which was based solely on the closing price of the units on the SGX-ST of $0.835 per unit as of December 31, 2021, and did not take into account any potential discount for the holding period risk due to the quantity of units we hold. As of March 31, 2022, the aggregate value of our investment in the units of the SREIT was $163.0 million, which was based solely on the closing price of the units on the SGX-ST of $0.755 per unit as of March 31, 2022, and did not take into account any potential discount for the holding period risk due to the quantity of units we hold.
Should we experience significant reductions in rental revenue in the future related to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, this may limit our ability to draw on our revolving credit facilities or exercise our extension options due to covenants described in our loan agreements.
While the spread of COVID-19 may eventually be contained or mitigated, there is no guarantee that a future outbreak or any other widespread epidemics will not occur, or that the global economy will recover, either of which could materially harm our business.
Because of the concentration of a significant portion of our assets in three geographic areas and in core office properties, any adverse economic, real estate or business conditions in these geographic areas or in the U.S. office market could affect our operating results and our ability to pay distributions to our stockholders.
As of March 1, 2022, a significant portion of our real estate properties was located in California, Illinois and Texas. As such, the geographic concentration of our portfolio makes us particularly susceptible to adverse economic developments in the California, Illinois and Texas real estate markets. In addition, the majority of our real estate properties consists of core office properties. Any adverse economic or real estate developments in these geographic markets, such as business layoffs or downsizing, industry slowdowns, relocations of businesses, changing demographics and other factors, or any decrease in demand for office space could adversely affect our operating results and our ability to pay distributions to our stockholders.
A significant percentage of our assets is invested in Accenture Tower and the value of our stockholders’ investment in us will fluctuate with the performance of this investment.
As of December 31, 2021, Accenture Tower represented approximately 16% of our total assets and represented approximately 13% of our total annualized base rent. Further, as a result of this investment, the geographic concentration of our portfolio makes us particularly susceptible to adverse economic developments in the Chicago real estate market. Any adverse economic or real estate developments in this market, such as business layoffs or downsizing, industry slowdowns, relocations of businesses, changing demographics and other factors, or any decrease in demand for office space resulting from the local business climate, could adversely affect our operating results and our ability to pay distributions to our stockholders.
We may not be able to operate our business successfully or generate sufficient revenue to make or sustain distributions to our stockholders.
As of March 1, 2022, we owned 16 office properties, one mixed-used office/retail property and an investment in the equity securities of the SREIT. We cannot assure our stockholders that we will be able to operate our business successfully or implement our operating policies and strategies. We can provide no assurance that our performance will replicate the past performance of other KBS-sponsored programs. Our investment returns could be substantially lower than the returns achieved by other KBS-sponsored programs. The results of our operations depend on several factors, including the availability of opportunities for the acquisition of additional assets, the level and volatility of interest rates, the availability of short and long-term financing, conditions in the financial markets and general economic conditions.
Because we depend upon our advisor and its affiliates to select, acquire, manage and dispose of our real estate investments and to conduct our operations, any adverse changes in the financial health of our advisor or its affiliates or our relationship with them could cause our operations to suffer.
We depend on our advisor to select, acquire, manage and dispose of our real estate investments and to conduct our operations. Our advisor depends upon the fees and other compensation that it receives from us, KBS Real Estate Investment Trust II, Inc. (“KBS REIT II”), KBS Growth & Income REIT, Inc. (“KBS Growth & Income REIT”), and any future KBS-sponsored programs that it advises to conduct its operations. Any adverse changes to our relationship with, or the financial condition of, our advisor and its affiliates could hinder their ability to successfully manage our operations and our portfolio of investments.
We have paid distributions in part from debt financings and in the future we may not pay distributions solely from our cash flow from operating activities. To the extent that we pay distributions from sources other than our cash flow from operating activities, the overall return to our stockholders may be reduced.
Our distribution policy is not to use the proceeds of our offerings to make distributions. However, our organizational documents permit us to pay distributions from any source, including offering proceeds or borrowings (which may constitute a return of capital), and our charter does not limit the amount of funds we may use from any source to pay such distributions. We have paid distributions in part from debt financings, and in the future, we may not pay distributions solely from our cash flow from operating activities, in which case distributions may be paid in whole or in part from debt financing. We have and in the future we may fund such distributions with proceeds from the sale of assets. If we fund distributions from borrowings, our interest expense and other financing costs, as well as the repayment of such borrowings, will reduce our earnings and cash flow from operating activities available for distribution in future periods. If we fund distributions from the sale of assets, this will affect our ability to generate cash flow from operating activities in future periods. To the extent that we pay distributions from sources other than our cash flow from operating activities, the overall return to our stockholders may be reduced. In addition, to the extent distributions exceed cash flow from operating activities, a stockholder’s basis in our stock will be reduced and, to the extent distributions exceed a stockholder’s basis, the stockholder may recognize capital gain. There is no limit on the amount of distributions we may fund from sources other than from cash flow from operating activities.
For the year ended December 31, 2021, we paid aggregate distributions of $104.1 million, including $61.7 million of distributions paid in cash and $42.4 million of distributions reinvested through our dividend reinvestment plan. We funded our total distributions paid, which includes net cash distributions and dividends reinvested by stockholders, with $83.5 million (80%) of cash flow from current operating activities, $4.2 million (4%) of cash flow from operating activities in excess of distributions paid during prior periods and $16.4 million (16%) of proceeds from the sale of real estate. For the year ended December 31, 2021, our cash flow from operating activities to distributions paid coverage ratio was 97% and our funds from operations to distributions paid coverage ratio was 130%. For more information, see Part II, Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Funds from Operations and Modified Funds from Operations” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Distributions” in this Annual Report.
The loss of or the inability to retain or obtain key real estate and debt finance professionals at our advisor could delay or hinder implementation of our investment, management and disposition strategies, which could limit our ability to pay distributions and decrease the value of an investment in our shares.
Our success depends to a significant degree upon the contributions of Charles J. Schreiber, Jr. and the team of real estate and debt finance professions at our advisor. Neither we nor our advisor or its affiliates have employment agreements with these individuals and they may not remain associated with us, our advisor or its affiliates. If any of these persons were to cease their association with us, our advisor or its affiliates, we may be unable to find suitable replacements and our operating results could suffer as a result. We do not maintain key person life insurance on any person. We believe that our future success depends, in large part, upon our advisor’s and its affiliates’ ability to attract and retain highly skilled managerial, operational and marketing professionals. Competition for such professionals is intense, and our advisor and its affiliates may be unsuccessful in attracting and retaining such skilled professionals. Further, we have established strategic relationships with firms that have special expertise in certain services or detailed knowledge regarding real properties in certain geographic regions. Maintaining such relationships will be important for us to effectively compete in such regions. We may be unsuccessful in maintaining such relationships. If we lose or are unable to obtain the services of highly skilled professionals or do not establish or maintain appropriate strategic relationships, our ability to implement our investment, management and disposition strategies could be delayed or hindered and the value of our stockholders’ investment in us could decline.
Our rights and the rights of our stockholders to recover claims against our independent directors are limited, which could reduce our stockholders’ and our recovery against our independent directors if they negligently cause us to incur losses.
Maryland law provides that a director has no liability in that capacity if he or she performs his or her duties in good faith, in a manner he or she reasonably believes to be in our best interests and with the care that an ordinarily prudent person in a like position would use under similar circumstances. Our charter provides that none of our independent directors shall be liable to us or our stockholders for monetary damages and that we will generally indemnify them for losses unless they are grossly negligent or engage in willful misconduct. As a result, our stockholders and we may have more limited rights against our independent directors than might otherwise exist under common law, which could reduce our stockholders’ and our recovery from these persons if they act in a negligent manner. In addition, we may be obligated to fund the defense costs incurred by our independent directors (as well as by our other directors, officers, employees (if we ever have employees) and agents) in some cases, which would decrease the cash otherwise available for distribution to our stockholders.
We face risks associated with security breaches through cyber-attacks, cyber intrusions or otherwise, as well as other significant disruptions of our information technology (IT) networks and related systems.
We face risks associated with security breaches, whether through cyber-attacks or cyber intrusions over the Internet, malware, computer viruses, attachments to e-mails, persons inside our organization or persons with access to systems inside our organization, and other significant disruptions of our IT networks and related systems. The risk of a security breach or disruption, particularly through cyber-attack or cyber intrusion, including by computer hackers, foreign governments and cyber terrorists, has generally increased as the number, intensity and sophistication of attempted attacks and intrusions from around the world have increased. Our IT networks and related systems are essential to the operation of our business and our ability to perform day-to-day operations. Although we make efforts to maintain the security and integrity of these types of IT networks and related systems, and we have implemented various measures to manage the risk of a security breach or disruption, there can be no assurance that our security efforts and measures will be effective or that attempted security breaches or disruptions would not be successful or damaging. Even the most well protected information, networks, systems and facilities remain potentially vulnerable because the techniques used in such attempted security breaches evolve and generally are not recognized until launched against a target, and in some cases are designed not to be detected and, in fact, may not be detected. Accordingly, we may be unable to anticipate these techniques or to implement adequate security barriers or other preventative measures, and thus it is impossible for us to entirely mitigate this risk.
A security breach or other significant disruption involving our IT networks and related systems could:
•disrupt the proper functioning of our networks and systems and therefore our operations;
•result in misstated financial reports, violations of loan covenants and/or missed reporting deadlines;
•result in our inability to properly monitor our compliance with the rules and regulations regarding our qualification as a REIT;
•result in the unauthorized access to, and destruction, loss, theft, misappropriation or release of, proprietary, confidential, sensitive or otherwise valuable information of ours or others, which others could use to compete against us or which could expose us to damage claims by third-parties for disruptive, destructive or otherwise harmful purposes and outcomes;
•require significant management attention and resources to remedy any damages that result;
•subject us to claims for breach of contract, damages, credits, penalties or termination of leases or other agreements; or
•damage our reputation among our stockholders.
Any or all of the foregoing could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
Risks Related to Conflicts of Interest
Our advisor and its affiliates, including all of our executive officers, our affiliated director and other key real estate and debt finance professionals, face conflicts of interest caused by their compensation arrangements with us and with other KBS-sponsored programs, which could result in actions that are not in the long-term best interests of our stockholders.
All of our executive officers, our affiliated director and other key real estate and debt finance professionals are also officers, directors, managers, key professionals and/or holders of a direct or indirect controlling interest in our advisor, our dealer manager and/or other KBS-affiliated entities. Our advisor and its affiliates receive substantial fees from us. These fees could influence our advisor’s advice to us as well as the judgment of its affiliates. Among other matters, these compensation arrangements could affect their judgment with respect to:
•the continuation, renewal or enforcement of our agreements with our advisor and its affiliates, including the advisory agreement;
•equity offerings by us, including using our securities to acquire portfolios or other companies, which may entitle our dealer manager to additional dealer manager fees and would likely entitle our advisor to additional advisory fees;
•sales of real estate investments, which under our current advisory fee structure entitle our advisor to disposition fees and possible subordinated incentive fees;
•acquisitions of real estate investments, which under our current advisory fee structure entitle our advisor to acquisition or origination fees based on the cost of the investment and asset management fees based on the cost of the investment, and not based on the quality of the investment or the quality of the services rendered to us, which may influence our advisor to recommend riskier transactions to us and/or transactions that are not in our best interest and, in the case of acquisitions of investments from other KBS-sponsored programs, which might entitle our advisor or affiliates of our advisor to disposition fees and possible subordinated incentive fees in connection with its services for the seller;
•borrowings to acquire real estate investments, which borrowings will increase the acquisition and origination fees and asset-management fees payable to our advisor under our current advisory fee structure;
•whether we engage affiliates of our advisor for other services, which affiliates may receive fees in connection with the services regardless of the quality of the services provided to us;
•whether we pursue a liquidity event such as a listing of our shares of common stock on a national securities exchange, a sale of the company or a liquidation of our assets, which (i) may make it more likely for us to become self-managed or internalize our management, (ii) could positively or negatively affect the sales efforts for other KBS-sponsored programs, depending on the price at which our shares trade or the consideration received by our stockholders, and/or (iii) would affect the advisory fees received by our advisor; and
•whether and when we seek to sell the company or its assets, which sale under our current advisory fee structure could entitle our advisor to a subordinated incentive fee and terminate the asset management fee.
Our conflicts committee and our board of directors continue to evaluate various alternatives available to us, including whether or not to convert to a perpetual-life NAV REIT. If we convert to an NAV REIT, we would implement a revised advisory fee structure. See Part I, Item 1A, “Risk Factors - Risks of the Proposed NAV REIT Conversion” and Part III, Item 13, “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director Independence - Report of the Conflicts Committee - Certain Transactions with Related Persons.”
Our advisor and its affiliates face conflicts of interest relating to the acquisition of assets, the leasing of properties and the disposition of properties due to their relationship with other KBS-sponsored programs and/or KBS-advised investors, which could result in decisions that are not in our best interest or the best interests of our stockholders.
We rely on our sponsor, KBS Holdings LLC, and other key real estate and debt finance professionals at our advisor, including Mr. Schreiber, to identify suitable investment opportunities for us, to supervise property management and leasing of properties and to sell our properties. KBS REIT II and KBS Growth & Income REIT are also advised by KBS Capital Advisors. Mr. Schreiber and several of the other key real estate professionals at KBS Capital Advisors are also the key real estate professionals at KBS Realty Advisors LLC (“KBS Realty Advisors”) and its affiliates, the advisors to the private KBS-sponsored programs and the investment advisors to KBS-advised investors. In addition, KBS Realty Advisors serves as the U.S. asset manager for the SREIT, a Singapore real estate investment trust. As such, KBS-sponsored programs that have funds available for investment and KBS-advised investors that have funds available for investment rely on many of the same real estate and debt finance professionals, as will future KBS-sponsored programs and KBS-advised investors. Many investment opportunities that are suitable for us may also be suitable for other KBS-sponsored programs and KBS-advised investors. When these real estate and debt finance professionals direct an investment opportunity to any KBS-sponsored program or KBS-advised investor, they, in their sole discretion, will have to determine the program or investor for which the investment opportunity is most suitable based on the investment objectives, portfolio and criteria of each program or investor. Currently, the SREIT is in its acquisition stage.
In connection with the Singapore Transaction (defined herein), our advisor and KBS Realty Advisors proposed that our conflicts committee and board of directors adopt an asset allocation policy (the “Allocation Process”) among us, KBS REIT II and KBS Growth & Income REIT (collectively, the “Core Strategy REITs”) and the SREIT. The board of directors and conflicts committee adopted the Allocation Process as proposed. The Allocation Process provides that, in order to mitigate potential conflicts of interest that may arise among the Core REITs and the SREIT, upon the listing of the SREIT (which occurred on July 19, 2019), potential asset acquisitions that meet all of the following criteria would be offered first to the SREIT:
i.Class A office building;
ii.Purchase price of at least $125.0 million;
iii.Average occupancy of at least 90% for the first two years based on contractual in-place leases; and
iv.Stabilized property investment yield that is generally supportive of the distributions per unit of the SREIT.
To the extent the SREIT does not have the funds to acquire the asset or to the extent the external manager of the SREIT decides to forego the acquisition opportunity, such asset may then be offered to the Core Strategy REITs at the discretion of KBS Capital Advisors.
For so long as we are externally advised, our charter provides that it shall not be a proper purpose of the company for us to make any significant investment unless our advisor has recommended the investment to us. Thus, the real estate and debt finance professionals of our advisor could direct attractive investment opportunities to other KBS-sponsored programs or KBS-advised investors. Such events could result in us investing in properties that provide less attractive returns, which would reduce the level of distributions we may be able to pay our stockholders.
We and other KBS-sponsored programs and KBS-advised investors also rely on these real estate professionals to supervise the property management and leasing of properties. If the KBS team of real estate professionals directs creditworthy prospective tenants to properties owned by another KBS-sponsored program or KBS-advised investor when it could direct such tenants to our properties, our tenant base may have more inherent risk and our properties’ occupancy may be lower than might otherwise be the case.
In addition, we and other KBS-sponsored programs and KBS-advised investors rely on our sponsor and other key real estate professionals at our advisor to sell our properties. These KBS-sponsored programs and KBS-advised investors may possess properties in similar locations and/or of the same property types as ours and may be attempting to sell these properties at the same time we are attempting to sell some of our properties. If our advisor directs potential purchasers to properties owned by another KBS-sponsored program or KBS-advised investor when it could direct such purchasers to our properties, we may be unable to sell some or all of our properties at the time or at the price we otherwise would, which could limit our ability to pay distributions and reduce our stockholders’ overall investment return.
Further, existing and future KBS-sponsored programs and KBS-advised investors and Mr. Schreiber generally are not and will not be prohibited from engaging, directly or indirectly, in any business or from possessing interests in any other business venture or ventures, including businesses and ventures involved in the acquisition, origination, development, ownership, leasing or sale of real estate-related investments.
KBS Capital Advisors will face conflicts of interest relating to joint ventures that we may form with affiliates of KBS Capital Advisors, which conflicts could result in a disproportionate benefit to the other venture partners at our expense.
If approved by both a majority of our board of directors and a majority of our conflicts committee, we may enter into joint venture agreements with other KBS-sponsored programs or affiliated entities for the acquisition, development or improvement of properties or other investments. KBS Capital Advisors, our advisor, and KBS Realty Advisors and its affiliates, the advisors to the other KBS-sponsored programs and the investment advisers to institutional investors in real estate and real estate-related assets, have some of the same executive officers, directors and other key real estate and debt finance professionals; and these persons will face conflicts of interest in determining which KBS program or investor should enter into any particular joint venture agreement. These persons may also face a conflict in structuring the terms of the relationship between our interests and the interests of the KBS-affiliated co-venturer and in managing the joint venture. Any joint venture agreement or transaction between us and a KBS-affiliated co-venturer will not have the benefit of arm’s-length negotiation of the type normally conducted between unrelated co-venturers. The KBS-affiliated co-venturer may have economic or business interests or goals that are or may become inconsistent with our business interests or goals. These co-venturers may thus benefit to our and your detriment.
Our sponsor, our officers, our advisor and the real estate, debt finance, management and accounting professionals assembled by our advisor face competing demands on their time and this may cause our operations and our stockholders’ investment in us to suffer.
We rely on our sponsor, our officers, our advisor and the real estate, debt finance, management and accounting professionals that our advisor retains, including Charles J. Schreiber, Jr., Jeffrey K. Waldvogel and Stacie K. Yamane, to provide services to us for the day-to-day operation of our business. KBS REIT II and KBS Growth & Income REIT are also advised by KBS Capital Advisors, and KBS Capital Advisors may serve as the advisor to future KBS-sponsored programs and KBS-advised investors. Further, our officers and affiliated director are also officers and/or the affiliated director of other public KBS-sponsored programs. Messrs. Schreiber and Waldvogel and Ms. Yamane are also executive officers of KBS REIT II and KBS Growth & Income REIT. Messrs. Schreiber and Waldvogel and Ms. Yamane are executive officers of KBS Realty Advisors and its affiliates, the advisors of the private KBS-sponsored programs and the KBS-advised investors and the U.S. asset manager for the SREIT.
As a result of their interests in other KBS-sponsored programs, their obligations to KBS-advised investors and the fact that they engage in and will continue to engage in other business activities on behalf of themselves and others, Messrs. Schreiber and Waldvogel and Ms. Yamane face conflicts of interest in allocating their time among us, KBS REIT II, KBS Growth & Income REIT, KBS Capital Advisors, KBS Realty Advisors, other KBS-sponsored programs and/or other KBS-advised investors, as well as other business activities in which they are involved. In addition, KBS Capital Advisors and KBS Realty Advisors and their affiliates share many of the same key real estate, management and accounting professionals. During times of intense activity in other programs and ventures, these individuals may devote less time and fewer resources to our business than are necessary or appropriate to manage our business. Furthermore, some or all of these individuals may become employees of another KBS-sponsored program in an internalization transaction or, if we internalize our advisor, may not become our employees as a result of their relationship with other KBS-sponsored programs. If these events occur, the returns on our investments, and the value of our stockholders’ investment in us, may decline.
All of our executive officers, our affiliated director and the key real estate and debt finance professionals assembled by our advisor face conflicts of interest related to their positions and/or interests in our advisor and its affiliates, which could hinder our ability to implement our business strategy and to generate returns to our stockholders.
All of our executive officers, our affiliated director and the key real estate and debt finance professionals assembled by our advisor are also executive officers, directors, managers, key professionals and/or holders of a direct or indirect controlling interest in our advisor and/or other KBS-affiliated entities. Through KBS-affiliated entities, some of these persons also serve as the investment advisors to KBS-advised investors and, through KBS Capital Advisors and KBS Realty Advisors, these persons serve as the advisor to KBS REIT II, KBS Growth & Income REIT and other KBS-sponsored programs. In addition, KBS Realty Advisors serves as the U.S. asset manager for the SREIT. As a result, they owe fiduciary duties to each of these entities, their stockholders, members and limited partners and these investors, which fiduciary duties may from time to time conflict with the fiduciary duties that they owe to us and our stockholders. Their loyalties to these other entities and investors could result in action or inaction that is detrimental to our business, which could harm the implementation of our business strategy and our investment and leasing opportunities. Further, Mr. Schreiber and existing and future KBS-sponsored programs and KBS-advised investors generally are not and will not be prohibited from engaging, directly or indirectly, in any business or from possessing interests in any other business venture or ventures, including businesses and ventures involved in the acquisition, development, ownership, leasing or sale of real estate investments. If we do not successfully implement our business strategy, we may be unable to generate the cash needed to pay distributions to our stockholders and to maintain or increase the value of our assets.
Our board of directors’ loyalties to KBS REIT II, KBS Growth & Income REIT and possibly to future KBS-sponsored programs could influence its judgment, resulting in actions that may not be in our stockholders’ best interest or that result in a disproportionate benefit to another KBS-sponsored program at our expense.
All of our directors are also directors of KBS REIT II and our affiliated director is also an affiliated director of KBS Growth & Income REIT. The loyalties of our directors serving on the boards of directors of KBS REIT II and KBS Growth & Income REIT, or possibly on the boards of directors of future KBS-sponsored programs, may influence the judgment of our board of directors when considering issues for us that also may affect other KBS-sponsored and advised programs, such as the following:
•The conflicts committee of our board of directors must evaluate the performance of our advisor with respect to whether our advisor is presenting to us our fair share of investment opportunities. If our advisor is not presenting a sufficient number of investment opportunities to us because it is presenting many opportunities to other KBS-sponsored programs or if our advisor is giving preferential treatment to other KBS-sponsored programs in this regard, our conflicts committee may not be well-suited to enforce our rights under the terms of the advisory agreement or to seek a new advisor.
•We could enter into transactions with other KBS-sponsored programs, such as property sales, acquisitions or financing arrangements. Such transactions might entitle our advisor or its affiliates to increased fees and other compensation from either or both parties to the transaction. Decisions of our board or the conflicts committee regarding the terms of those transactions may be influenced by our board’s or the conflicts committee’s loyalties to such other KBS-sponsored programs.
•A decision of our board or the conflicts committee regarding the timing of a debt or equity offering could be influenced by concerns that the offering would compete with offerings of other KBS-sponsored programs.
•A decision of our board or the conflicts committee regarding the timing of property sales could be influenced by concerns that the sales would compete with those of other KBS-sponsored programs.
•A decision of our board regarding whether we pursue a liquidity event such as a listing of our shares of common stock on a national securities exchange, a sale of the company or a liquidation of our assets, which could positively or negatively affect the sales efforts for other KBS-sponsored programs.
Like us, KBS REIT II compensates each independent director with an annual retainer of $135,000, as well as compensation for attending meetings as follows:
•each member of the audit committee and conflicts committee is paid $10,000 annually for service on such committees (except that the chair of each of the audit committee and conflicts committee is paid $20,000 annually for service as the chair of such committees);
•after the tenth board of directors meeting of each calendar year, each independent director is paid (i) $2,500 for each in-person board of directors meeting attended for the remainder of the calendar year and (ii) $2,000 for each teleconference board of directors meeting attended for the remainder of the calendar year;
•after the tenth audit committee meeting of each calendar year, each member of the audit committee is paid (i) $2,500 for each in-person audit committee meeting attended for the remainder of the calendar year and (ii) $2,000 for each teleconference audit committee meeting attended for the remainder of the calendar year (except that the audit committee chair is paid $3,000 for each in-person and teleconference audit committee meeting attended after the tenth audit committee meeting of each calendar year, for the remainder of each calendar year); and
•after the tenth conflicts committee meeting of each calendar year, each member of the conflicts committee is paid (i) $2,500 for each in-person conflicts committee meeting attended for the remainder of the calendar year and (ii) $2,000 for each teleconference conflicts committee meeting attended for the remainder of the calendar year (except that the conflicts committee chair is paid $3,000 for each in-person and teleconference conflicts committee meeting attended after the tenth conflicts committee meeting of each calendar year, for the remainder of each calendar year).
In addition, KBS REIT II pays independent directors for attending other committee meetings as follows: each independent director is paid $2,000 for each in-person and teleconference committee meeting attended (except that the committee chair is paid $3,000 for each in-person and teleconference committee meeting attended).
All directors receive reimbursement of reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with attendance at board of directors meetings and committee meetings.
Risks Related to Our Corporate Structure
Our charter limits the number of shares a person may own and permits our board of directors to issue stock with terms that may subordinate the rights of our common stockholders or discourage a third party from acquiring us in a manner that could result in a premium price to our stockholders.
Our charter, with certain exceptions, authorizes our directors to take such actions as are necessary and desirable to preserve our qualification as a REIT. To help us comply with the REIT ownership requirements of the Internal Revenue Code, our charter prohibits a person from directly or constructively owning more than 9.8% of our outstanding shares, unless exempted by our board of directors. In addition, our board of directors may classify or reclassify any unissued common stock or preferred stock and establish the preferences, conversion or other rights, voting powers, restrictions, limitations as to dividends and other distributions, qualifications and terms or conditions of redemption of any such stock. Thus, our board of directors could authorize the issuance of preferred stock with priority as to distributions and amounts payable upon liquidation over the rights of the holders of our common stock. These charter provisions may have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a change in control of us, including an extraordinary transaction (such as a merger, tender offer or sale of all or substantially all of our assets) that might provide a premium price to holders of our common stock.
Our stockholders will have limited control over changes in our policies and operations, which increases the uncertainty and risks our stockholders face.
Our board of directors determines our major policies, including our policies regarding targeted investment allocation, financing, growth, debt capitalization, REIT qualification and distributions. Our board of directors may amend or revise these and other policies without a vote of the stockholders. Under Maryland General Corporation Law and our charter, our stockholders have a right to vote only on limited matters. Our board’s broad discretion in setting policies and our stockholders’ inability to exert control over those policies increases the uncertainty and risks our stockholders face.
Our stockholders may not be able to sell their shares under our share redemption program and, if our stockholders are able to sell their shares under the current share redemption program, they may not be able to recover an amount equal to the estimated value per share of our common stock.
Our current share redemption program includes numerous restrictions that limit our stockholders’ ability to sell their shares should they require liquidity and will limit our stockholders’ ability to recover an amount equal to the estimated value per share of our common stock.
In December 2019, our board of directors determined to temporarily suspend Ordinary Redemptions under the share redemption program, and Ordinary Redemptions remained suspended through June 30, 2021. Further, on June 3, 2021, we announced that, in connection with the approval of a self-tender offer, our board of directors had approved a temporary suspension of all redemptions under the share redemption program, including Special Redemptions. On July 14, 2021, our board of directors approved an amended and restated share redemption program (the “Amended Share Redemption Program”), and Ordinary Redemptions and Special Redemptions resumed effective for the July 30, 2021 redemption date.
Pursuant to the Amended Share Redemption Program, for calendar year 2021, we could redeem up to 5% of the weighted-average number of shares outstanding during the 2020 calendar year, provided that, if we received requests for redemptions, whether in connection with Special Redemptions or otherwise, that if honored, and when combined with all prior redemptions made during the 2021 calendar year, would result in the number of remaining shares available for redemption in the 2021 calendar year being 500,000 or less, the last 500,000 shares available for redemption were reserved exclusively for Special Redemptions.
On March 17, 2022, our board of directors approved a further amendment to our share redemption program to decrease the reserve for Special Redemptions for calendar year 2022 from $10.0 million to $2.0 million. As such, during calendar year 2022, the share redemption program limits the number of shares we may redeem to those that we could purchase with the amount of net proceeds from the sale of shares under our dividend reinvestment plan during the prior calendar year, provided that once we have received requests for redemptions, whether in connection with Special Redemptions or otherwise, that if honored, and when combined with all prior redemptions made during the calendar year, would result in the amount of remaining funds available for the redemption of additional shares in such calendar year being $2.0 million or less, the last $2.0 million of available funds shall be reserved exclusively for Special Redemptions. During any calendar year subsequent to 2022, the share redemption program limits the number of shares we may redeem to those that we could purchase with the amount of net proceeds from the sale of shares under our dividend reinvestment plan during the prior calendar year, provided that once we have received requests for redemptions, whether in connection with Special Redemptions or otherwise, that if honored, and when combined with all prior redemptions made during the calendar year, would result in the amount of remaining funds available for the redemption of additional shares in such calendar year being $10.0 million or less, the last $10.0 million of available funds shall be reserved exclusively for Special Redemptions. We may increase or decrease the funding available for the redemption of shares pursuant to the program upon ten business days’ notice to our stockholders.
Moreover, the share redemption program contains several general limitations on our ability to redeem shares under the program. During any calendar year, we may redeem no more than 5% of the weighted-average number of shares outstanding during the prior calendar year. Additionally, unless the shares are being redeemed in connection with a Special Redemption, we may not redeem shares unless the stockholder has held the shares for one year. Further, we have no obligation to redeem shares if the redemption would violate the restrictions on distributions under Maryland General Corporation Law, as amended from time to time, which prohibits distributions that would cause a corporation to fail to meet statutory tests of solvency. These limits may prevent us from accommodating all redemption requests made in any year.
As of March 1, 2022, we had $17.4 million available for redemptions for the remainder of 2022 under the share redemption program, including the reserve for Special Redemptions. We cannot predict future redemption demand with any certainty. If future redemption requests exceed the amount of funding available under our share redemption program, the number of rejected redemption requests will increase over time.
In addition, under the share redemption program, Ordinary Redemptions are made at a price per share equal to 96% of our most recent estimated value per share as of the applicable redemption date, and redemptions made in connection with Special Redemptions are made at a price per share equal to the most recent estimated value per share of our common stock as of the applicable redemption date. On November 1, 2021, our board of directors approved an estimated value per share of our common stock of $10.78 based on the estimated value of our assets less the estimated value of our liabilities divided by the number of shares outstanding, all as of September 30, 2021, with the exception of adjustments to our net asset value to give effect to (i) the change in the estimated value of our investment in units of the SREIT (SGX-ST Ticker: OXMU) as of October 22, 2021 and (ii) the contractual sales price less estimated disposition costs and fees of one property that was under contract to sell as of November 1, 2021.
We currently expect to announce an updated estimated value per share no later than December 2022.
During their operating stages, other KBS-sponsored REITs have amended their share redemption programs to limit redemptions to Special Redemptions or place restrictive limitations on the amount of funds available for redemptions. As a result, these programs were or are not able (two programs have now liquidated) to honor all redemption requests and stockholders in these programs were or are unable to have their shares redeemed when requested. In some instances, ordinary redemptions were or have been suspended for several years. When implementing these amendments, stockholders did not always have a final opportunity to submit redemptions prior to the effectiveness of the amendment to the program.
Our board may amend, suspend or terminate our share redemption program upon ten business days’ notice to stockholders, and consistent with SEC guidance and interpretations, we may increase or decrease the funding available for the redemption of shares pursuant to our share redemption program upon ten business days’ notice to our stockholders. See Part II, Item 5, “Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities - Amended and Restated Share Redemption Program” for more information about the current share redemption program. See Part II, Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Subsequent Events - Amended and Restated Share Redemption Program.”
Our bylaws designate the Circuit Court for Baltimore City, Maryland, or, if that court does not have jurisdiction, the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, Baltimore Division, as the sole and exclusive forum for certain types of actions and proceedings that may be initiated by our stockholders, which could limit our stockholders’ ability to obtain a favorable judicial forum for disputes with us or our directors, officers or employees.
Our bylaws provide that, unless we consent in writing to the selection of an alternative forum, the Circuit Court for Baltimore City, Maryland, or, if that court does not have jurisdiction, the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, Baltimore Division, shall be the sole and exclusive forum for certain types of actions and proceedings that may be initiated by our stockholders with respect to our company, our directors, our officers or our employees (we note we currently have no employees). This choice of forum provision may limit a stockholder’s ability to bring a claim in a judicial forum that the stockholder believes is favorable for disputes with us or our directors, officers or employees, which may discourage meritorious claims from being asserted against us and our directors, officers and employees. Alternatively, if a court were to find this provision of our bylaws inapplicable to, or unenforceable in respect of, one or more of the specified types of actions or proceedings, we may incur additional costs associated with resolving such matters in other jurisdictions, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations. We adopted this provision because we believe it makes it less likely that we will be forced to incur the expense of defending duplicative actions in multiple forums and less likely that plaintiffs’ attorneys will be able to employ such litigation to coerce us into otherwise unjustified settlements, and we believe the risk of a court declining to enforce this provision is remote, as the General Assembly of Maryland has specifically amended the Maryland General Corporation Law to authorize the adoption of such provisions. This provision of our bylaws does not apply to claims brought to enforce a duty or liability created by the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or any other claim for which the federal courts have exclusive jurisdiction or to claims under state securities laws.
The estimated value per share of our common stock may not reflect the value that stockholders will receive for their investment and does not take into account how developments subsequent to the valuation date related to individual assets, the financial or real estate markets or other events may have increased or decreased the value of our portfolio.
On November 1, 2021, our board of directors approved an estimated value per share of our common stock of $10.78 based on the estimated value of our assets less the estimated value of our liabilities, or net asset value, divided by the number of shares outstanding, all as of September 30, 2021, with the exception of adjustments to our net asset value to give effect to (i) the change in the estimated value of our investment in units of the SREIT (SGX-ST Ticker: OXMU) as of October 22, 2021 and (ii) the contractual sales price less estimated disposition costs and fees of one property that was under contract to sell as of November 1, 2021. We did not make any other adjustments to the estimated value per share subsequent to September 30, 2021, including any adjustments relating to the following, among others: (i) the issuance of common stock and the payment of related offering costs related to our dividend reinvestment plan offering; (ii) net operating income earned and distributions declared; and (iii) the redemption of shares. We provided this estimated value per share to assist broker-dealers that participated in our now-terminated initial public offering in meeting their customer account statement reporting obligations under Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”) Rule 2231. This valuation was performed in accordance with the provisions of and also to comply with Practice Guideline 2013-01, Valuations of Publicly Registered, Non-Listed REITs, issued by the Institute for Portfolio Alternatives (“IPA”) in April 2013 (the “IPA Valuation Guidelines”).
We engaged Kroll, LLC (formerly Duff & Phelps, LLC) (“Kroll”), an independent third-party real estate valuation firm, to provide (i) appraisals for 17 of our consolidated real estate properties owned as of September 30, 2021 (the “Appraised Properties”), (ii) an estimated value for our investment in units of the SREIT and (iii) a calculation of the range in estimated value per share of our common stock as of November 1, 2021. Kroll based this range in estimated value per share upon (i) its appraisals of the Appraised Properties, (ii) the contractual sales price less estimated disposition costs and fees of one property that was under contract to sell as of November 1, 2021, (iii) its estimated value for our investment in units of the SREIT, and (iv) valuations performed by our advisor of our cash, other assets, notes payable and other liabilities, which are disclosed in our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2021.
As with any valuation methodology, the methodologies used are based upon a number of estimates and assumptions that may not be accurate or complete. Different parties using different assumptions and estimates could derive a different estimated value per share of our common stock, and this difference could be significant. The estimated value per share is not audited and does not represent the fair value of our assets less the fair value of our liabilities according to U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”), nor does it represent a liquidation value of our assets and liabilities or the price at which our shares of common stock would trade on a national securities exchange. The estimated value per share does not reflect a discount for the fact that we are externally managed, nor does it reflect a real estate portfolio premium/discount versus the sum of the individual property values. The estimated value per share also does not take into account estimated disposition costs and fees for real estate properties that were not under contract to sell as of November 1, 2021, debt prepayment penalties that could apply upon the prepayment of certain of our debt obligations, the impact of restrictions on the assumption of debt or swap breakage fees that may be incurred upon the termination of certain of our swaps prior to expiration. We generally have incurred disposition costs and fees related to the sale of each real estate property since inception of 0.8% to 2.9% of the gross sales price less concessions and credits, with the weighted average being approximately 1.4%. The estimated value per share also does not take into consideration acquisition-related costs and financing costs related to any future acquisitions subsequent to November 1, 2021. Accordingly, with respect to the estimated value per share, we can give no assurance that:
•a stockholder would be able to resell his or her shares at our estimated value per share;
•a stockholder would ultimately realize distributions per share equal to our estimated value per share upon liquidation of our assets and settlement of our liabilities or a sale of our company;
•our shares of common stock would trade at the estimated value per share on a national securities exchange;
•another independent third-party appraiser or third-party valuation firm would agree with our estimated value per share; or
•the methodology used to determine our estimated value per share would be acceptable to FINRA or for compliance with ERISA reporting requirements.
The value of our shares will fluctuate over time in response to developments related to future investments, the performance of individual assets in our portfolio and the management of those assets, the real estate and finance markets and due to other factors. In particular, the COVID-19 pandemic, together with the resulting measures imposed to help control the spread of the virus, has had a negative impact on the economy and business activity globally. The COVID-19 pandemic is negatively impacting many industries, including the U.S. office real estate industry and the industries of our tenants, directly or indirectly. While we considered the impact from COVID-19 on our November 1, 2021 estimated value per share, the extent to which the COVID-19 pandemic impacts our operations and those of our tenants and our investment in the units of the SREIT depends on future developments, which are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted with confidence, including the scope, severity and duration of the pandemic, the actions taken to contain the pandemic or mitigate its impact, and the direct and indirect economic effects of the pandemic and containment measures, among others. As such, the estimated value per share does not take into account developments in our portfolio since November 1, 2021. For a full description of the methodologies and assumptions used to value our assets and liabilities in connection with the calculation of the estimated value per share, see Part II, Item 5, “Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities - Market Information.”
We currently expect to utilize an independent valuation firm to update the estimated value per share no later than December 2022.
The actual value of shares that we repurchase under our share redemption program may be less than what we pay.
Under our current share redemption program, shares may be repurchased at varying prices depending on whether the redemptions are in connection with a Special Redemption. Pursuant to our share redemption program, redemptions made in connection with Special Redemptions are made at a price per share equal to the most recent estimated value per share of our common stock as of the applicable redemption date, which is currently $10.78 per share, and Ordinary Redemptions are made at a price per share equal to 96% of our most recent estimated value per share as of the applicable redemption date, which is currently $10.35. Although these redemption prices are based on our current estimated value per share, this reported value is likely to differ from the price at which a stockholder could resell his or her shares for the reasons discussed in the risk factor above. Thus, when we repurchase shares of our common stock at $10.78 per share, the actual value of the shares that we repurchase is likely to be less, and the repurchase is likely to be dilutive to our remaining stockholders. Even at lower repurchase prices, the actual value of the shares may be less than what we pay and the repurchase may be dilutive to our remaining stockholders.
The current offering price of shares under our dividend reinvestment plan is equal to 95% of the November 1, 2021 estimated value per share approved by our board of directors. It does not take into account developments in our portfolio or the markets since November 1, 2021, including the uncertainty as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. As a result, a reinvestment of dividends in our common stock bears increased risk.
Pursuant to our dividend reinvestment plan, participants in the dividend reinvestment plan acquire shares of our common stock under the plan at a price equal to 95% of the estimated value per share of our common stock. As such, participants currently acquire shares of our common stock under the plan at a price equal to $10.24 per share, which is 95% of our November 1, 2021 estimated value per share. The value of our shares will fluctuate over time in response to developments related to future investments, the performance of individual assets in our portfolio and the management of those assets, the real estate and finance markets and due to other factors. As such, the estimated value per share does not take into account developments in our portfolio since November 1, 2021. While we considered the impact from COVID-19 on the November 1, 2021 estimated value per share, the extent to which the COVID-19 pandemic impacts our operations and those of our tenants and our investment in the SREIT depends on future developments, which are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted with confidence, including the scope, severity and duration of the pandemic, the actions taken to contain the pandemic or mitigate its impact, and the direct and indirect economic effects of the pandemic and containment measures, among others. These risks are not priced into our most recent estimated value per share, and given the uncertainty, no assurances can be given that the purchase price of shares of our common stock reflect the underlying value of our assets. As a result, a reinvestment of distributions in our common stock bears increased risk.
If funds are not available from our dividend reinvestment plan offering for general corporate purposes, then we may have to use a greater proportion of our cash flow from operations to meet our general cash requirements, which would reduce cash available for distributions and could limit our ability to redeem shares under our share redemption program.
We depend on the proceeds from our dividend reinvestment plan offering for general corporate purposes including, but not limited to: the redemption of shares under our share redemption program; capital expenditures, tenant improvement costs and leasing costs related to our real estate properties; reserves required by any financings of our real estate investments; the acquisition or origination of real estate investments; and the repayment of debt. We cannot predict with any certainty how much, if any, dividend reinvestment plan proceeds will be available for general corporate purposes. If such funds are not available from our dividend reinvestment plan offering, then we may have to use a greater proportion of our cash flow from operations to meet our general cash requirements, which would reduce cash available for distributions and could limit our ability to redeem shares under our share redemption program.
See also the discussion above under “Our stockholders may not be able to sell their shares under our share redemption program and, if our stockholders are able to sell their shares under the current share redemption program, they may not be able to recover an amount equal to the estimated value per share of our common stock.”
Our stockholders’ interest in us will be diluted if we issue additional shares, which could reduce the overall value of their investment.
Our common stockholders do not have preemptive rights to any shares we issue in the future. Our charter authorizes us to issue 1,010,000,000 shares of capital stock, of which 1,000,000,000 shares are designated as common stock and 10,000,000 shares are designated as preferred stock. Our board of directors may increase the number of authorized shares of capital stock without stockholder approval. Our board may elect to (i) sell additional shares in our dividend reinvestment plan or in future primary offerings; (ii) issue equity interests in private offerings; (iii) issue equity interests to our advisor, or its successors or assigns, in payment of fee obligations; (iv) issue equity interests to sellers of properties or assets we acquire in connection with an exchange of limited partnership interests of the Operating Partnership; or (v) otherwise issue additional shares of our capital stock or units of our Operating Partnership. To the extent we issue additional equity interests, whether in future primary offerings, pursuant to our dividend reinvestment plan or otherwise, our stockholders’ percentage ownership interest in us would be diluted. In addition, depending upon the terms and pricing of any additional issuance of shares, the use of the proceeds and the value of our real estate investments, our stockholders may also experience dilution in the book value and fair value of their shares and in the earnings and distributions per share.
Payment of fees to our advisor and its affiliates reduces cash available for investment and distribution to our stockholders and increases the risk that our stockholders will not be able to recover the amount of their investment in our shares or an amount equal to the estimated value per share of our common stock.
Our advisor and its affiliates perform services for us in connection with the selection and acquisition or origination of our real estate investments, the management and leasing of our real estate properties and the disposition of our investments. We pay them substantial fees for these services, which results in immediate dilution of the value of our stockholders’ investment in us and reduces the amount of cash available for investments or distribution to stockholders. Compensation to be paid to our advisor may be increased with the approval of our conflicts committee and subject to the limitations in our charter, which would further dilute our stockholders’ investment in us and reduce the amount of cash available for investment or distribution to stockholders.
We may also pay significant fees during our listing/liquidation stage. Although most of the fees expected to be paid during our listing/liquidation stage are contingent on our stockholders first receiving agreed-upon investment returns, the investment-return thresholds may be reduced with the approval of our conflicts committee and subject to the limitations in our charter.
Therefore, these fees increase the risk that the amount of cash available for distribution to our stockholders upon a liquidation of our portfolio would be less than the amount stockholders paid to acquire our shares or an amount equal to the estimated value per share of our common stock. These substantial fees and other payments also increase the risk that our stockholders will not be able to resell their shares at a profit.
Our conflicts committee and our board of directors continue to evaluate various alternatives available to us, including whether or not to convert to a perpetual-life NAV REIT. If we convert to an NAV REIT, we would implement a revised advisory fee structure. See Part I, Item 1A, “Risk Factors - Risks of the Proposed NAV REIT Conversion” and Part III, Item 13, “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director Independence - Report of the Conflicts Committee - Certain Transactions with Related Persons.”
If we are unable to obtain funding for future capital needs, cash distributions to our stockholders and the value of an investment in us could decline.
When tenants do not renew their leases or otherwise vacate their space, we will often need to expend substantial funds for improvements to the vacated space in order to attract replacement tenants. Even when tenants do renew their leases, we may agree to make improvements to their space as part of our negotiations. If we need additional capital in the future to improve or maintain our properties or for any other reason, we may have to obtain funding from sources other than our cash flow from operations, such as borrowings or future equity offerings. These sources of funding may not be available on attractive terms or at all. If we cannot procure additional funding for capital improvements, our investments may generate lower cash flows or decline in value, or both, which would limit our ability to pay distributions to our stockholders and could reduce the value of our stockholders’ investment.
Although we are not currently afforded the protection of the Maryland General Corporation Law relating to deterring or defending hostile takeovers, our board of directors could opt into these provisions of Maryland law in the future, which may discourage others from trying to acquire control of us and may prevent our stockholders from receiving a premium price for their stock in connection with a business combination.
Under Maryland law, “business combinations” between a Maryland corporation and certain interested stockholders or affiliates of interested stockholders are prohibited for five years after the most recent date on which the interested stockholder becomes an interested stockholder. These business combinations include a merger, consolidation, share exchange or, in circumstances specified in the statute, an asset transfer or issuance or reclassification of equity securities. Also under Maryland law, control shares of a Maryland corporation acquired in a control share acquisition have no voting rights except to the extent approved by a vote of two-thirds of the votes entitled to be cast on the matter. Shares owned by the acquirer, an officer of the corporation or an employee of the corporation who is also a director of the corporation are excluded from the vote on whether to accord voting rights to the control shares. Should our board of directors opt into these provisions of Maryland law, it may discourage others from trying to acquire control of us and increase the difficulty of consummating any offer. Similarly, provisions of Title 3, Subtitle 8 of the Maryland General Corporation Law could provide similar anti-takeover protection.
Our charter includes an anti-takeover provision that may discourage a stockholder from launching a tender offer for our shares.
Our charter provides that any tender offer made by a stockholder, including any “mini-tender” offer, must comply with most provisions of Regulation 14D of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. The offering stockholder must provide our company notice of such tender offer at least 10 business days before initiating the tender offer. If the offering stockholder does not comply with these requirements, our company will have the right to redeem that stockholder’s shares and any shares acquired in such tender offer. In addition, the noncomplying stockholder shall be responsible for all of our company’s expenses in connection with that stockholder’s noncompliance. This provision of our charter may discourage a stockholder from initiating a tender offer for our shares and prevent our stockholders from receiving a premium price for their shares in such a transaction.
Our stockholders’ return may be reduced if we are required to register as an investment company under the Investment Company Act.
We intend to continue to conduct our operations so that neither we, nor our Operating Partnership nor the subsidiaries of our Operating Partnership are investment companies under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “Investment Company Act”). However, there can be no assurance that we and our subsidiaries will be able to successfully avoid operating as an investment company. A change in the value of any of our assets could negatively affect our ability to maintain our exemption from regulation under the Investment Company Act. To maintain compliance with the applicable exemption under the Investment Company Act, we may be unable to sell assets we would otherwise want to sell and may need to sell assets we would otherwise wish to retain. In addition, we may have to acquire additional assets that we might not otherwise have acquired or may have to forego opportunities to acquire assets that we would otherwise want to acquire and would be important to our investment strategy.
If we were required to register as an investment company but failed to do so, we would become subject to substantial regulation with respect to our capital structure (including our ability to use borrowings), management, operations, transactions with affiliated persons (as defined in the Investment Company Act), and portfolio composition, including disclosure requirements and restrictions with respect to diversification and industry concentration, and other matters. Compliance with the Investment Company Act would, accordingly, limit our ability to make certain investments and require us to significantly restructure our business plan, which could materially adversely affect our estimated value per share and our ability to pay distributions to our stockholders.
Risks of the Proposed NAV REIT Conversion
Our conflicts committee and our board of directors continue to evaluate various alternatives available to us, including whether or not to convert to a non-listed, perpetual-life “NAV REIT” (the “Proposed NAV REIT Conversion”) that calculates the net asset value or “NAV” per share on a regular basis that is more frequent than annually (i.e., daily, monthly or quarterly) and seeks to provide increased liquidity to current and future stockholders through an expansion of our current share redemption program and/or periodic self-tender offers. In connection with our pursuit of conversion to an NAV REIT, on January 10, 2020, we filed a registration statement on Form S-11 with the SEC to register a public offering. Pursuant to the registration statement and in the event we convert to an NAV REIT, we propose to register up to $2,000,000,000 of shares of common stock, consisting of up to $1,700,000,000 in shares in a primary offering and up to $300,000,000 in shares pursuant to a dividend reinvestment plan. We can give no assurance that we will pursue a conversion to an NAV REIT or that if we do pursue conversion to an NAV REIT that we would commence or complete the proposed offering. Even if we convert to an NAV REIT, there is no assurance that we will successfully implement our strategy, and we can provide no assurance that our NAV REIT strategy will be able to provide additional liquidity to stockholders.
The following are the principal risks associated with the Proposed NAV REIT Conversion.
Our NAV REIT strategy may not result in increased liquidity for our stockholders.
If we convert to an NAV REIT, we intend to adopt a revised share redemption program that allows us to make monthly redemptions with an aggregate value of up to 5% of our NAV per calendar quarter, a greater percentage of our shares each year than our current share redemption program; however, we cannot provide assurances that we will do so. We may decide for market, regulatory or other reasons to have a more limited share redemption program or conduct periodic self-tender offers on terms that we believe are appropriate.
We will not be required to purchase any particular number of shares, at any particular frequency or at any particular pricing, pursuant to our proposed revised share redemption program or pursuant to periodic self-tender offers. If we convert to an NAV REIT and adopt the proposed revised share redemption program, our board of directors will be permitted to modify or suspend such share redemption program if in its reasonable judgment it deems such action to be in our best interest and the best interest of our stockholders. If we suspended our proposed revised share redemption program, the program would require our board of directors to consider at least quarterly whether the continued suspension of the program is in our best interest and the best interest of our stockholders; however, we would not be required to authorize the recommencement of the proposed revised share redemption program within any specified period of time. Our board of directors could not terminate our proposed revised share redemption program absent a liquidity event which results in our stockholders receiving cash or securities listed on a national securities exchange or where otherwise required by law.
We may not have sufficient funding to satisfy the demand for liquidity. One of our primary sources for funding is currently expected to be a portion of the net proceeds from our proposed new ongoing public offerings, but we cannot guarantee that the net proceeds raised will be sufficient to satisfy the demand for liquidity and our other capital needs, such as capital expenditures and funds for new investments.
We cannot predict future redemption demand with any certainty. If future redemption requests exceed the amount of funding available under our proposed revised share redemption program and any additional funding made available under one or more self-tender offers, the number of rejected redemption or repurchase requests will increase over time.
You will be dependent on the board of directors to adopt and oversee valuation procedures to determine the NAV of our shares; the prices at which we sell and redeem our shares will be based on the NAV per share determined in accordance with these valuation procedures plus, in the case of our offering price, applicable upfront selling commissions and dealer manager fees.
In connection with our NAV REIT strategy, our board of directors intends to adopt valuation procedures to determine a monthly NAV per share. However, we may compute the NAV less frequently than monthly, such as quarterly. In addition, the procedures, methods and assumptions used to determine the NAV will be solely in our discretion and subject to change, will not be subject to GAAP and will not be subject to independent audit. No rule or regulation requires that we calculate our NAV in a certain way. Our board of directors has not finalized these procedures and once they do, our board of directors may adopt changes to the valuation procedures. The valuation procedures we adopt may be different from those used in our prior estimated value per share calculations.
The prices at which we sell shares in our offerings and redeem or repurchase shares under our share redemption program and/or self-tender offers will not be market-based prices. We currently intend for those prices to be based on the NAV per share of the applicable class of stock as of the last calendar day of the prior month (which will be our most recently disclosed NAV per share at such time) plus, in the case of the offering price, applicable upfront selling commissions and dealer manager fees. If our NAV calculations are too high, we may overpay for shares that we redeem, which would harm our remaining stockholders. If our NAV calculations are too low, we may dilute our existing stockholders when we sell new shares and we may underpay stockholders that sell their shares to us. Moreover, the NAV per share as of the date on which a subscription request or redemption request is made may be significantly different than the offering price paid or the redemption price received. There will be no market prices for our shares and you will be entirely dependent on us to determine an appropriate monthly NAV per share, which may not correspond to realizable value upon a sale of our assets.
Our NAV REIT strategy will result in additional expenses.
Our NAV REIT strategy will involve continuous, ongoing public offerings that will require registration with the SEC under federal securities laws and with each state in which we offer shares. Maintaining such offerings will result in offering fees and expenses. We also expect to incur additional expenses in connection with calculating a monthly NAV per share. We intend to offer additional liquidity to our stockholders through our share redemption program and/or tender offers or through special distributions to stockholders, which will reduce the size of our company and therefore may make ongoing expenses as an NAV REIT more burdensome.
New investors in our new offerings may have divergent interests from investors in our initial public offering.
We conducted our initial public offering of common stock from October 2010 through July 2015. Investors in the initial public offering have now held their shares between approximately six and eleven years. When (and if) we launch a new public offering as an NAV REIT, they will have held their shares for an even longer period. New investors in our company may place a greater priority on funding for new investments than for liquidity or other purposes. They may be more supportive of our NAV REIT strategy than our original investors. Divergent interests of our stockholders may affect decisions by our board of directors or management, and may impact stockholder votes on various matters.
We may not raise a meaningful amount of capital in our ongoing offerings as an NAV REIT.
We currently intend to use the proceeds from our offerings as an NAV REIT, net of the fees and other expenses we pay in connection with the offerings: (1) to provide increased liquidity to our stockholders in excess of what is currently offered; (2) to make additional investments in accordance with our investment strategy and policies with the intention of growing the portfolio; and (3) for other general corporate purposes (which may include repayment of our debt or any other corporate purposes we deem appropriate). However, we may not raise a meaningful amount of capital in our ongoing offerings as an NAV REIT, which would mean that we would not have as much money for any of these purposes. In particular, we may face challenges raising additional capital if we are not able to satisfy our stockholders’ redemption requests on a regular basis.
We intend to retain a dealer manager to conduct our ongoing offerings as an NAV REIT. The success of our offerings, and our ability to implement our business strategy, will be dependent upon the ability of our dealer manager to build and maintain a network of broker-dealers to sell our shares to their clients. If our dealer manager is not successful in establishing, operating and managing a network of broker-dealers, our ability to raise proceeds through future offerings will be limited and we may not have adequate capital to implement our NAV REIT strategy. Moreover, these offerings would be conducted on a “best efforts” basis, which means that our dealer manager must only use its best efforts to sell the shares in the offerings and no underwriter, broker-dealer or other person would have any firm commitment or obligation to purchase any shares or to obtain any subscriptions on our behalf. We cannot assure you that any minimum number of shares of common stock would be sold. The past performance of our dealer manager cannot be relied upon as predictive of our dealer manager’s future performance.
We may suffer from delays in locating suitable investments with the capital we raise in our ongoing offerings as a perpetual-life company.
As described above, we intend to use a portion of the net proceeds from our offerings as an NAV REIT to make additional investments in accordance with our investment strategy and policies with the intention of growing the portfolio. However, we could suffer from delays in locating suitable investments. The more shares we sell in our offerings, the more difficult it may be to invest the net offering proceeds promptly and on attractive terms. Our reliance on our advisor and the real estate and debt finance professionals that our advisor retains to identify suitable investments for us at times when such persons are simultaneously seeking to identify suitable investments for other KBS-sponsored programs or KBS-advised investors could also delay the investment of the proceeds from our offerings. KBS Realty Advisors, an affiliate of our advisor, acts as the U.S. asset manager for the SREIT. Currently, the SREIT is also in its acquisition stage, and our sponsor and its affiliates may also sponsor or advise public or private programs or accounts in the future while our offerings as an NAV REIT are ongoing.
In connection with the Singapore Transaction, our advisor, KBS Capital Advisors, and KBS Realty Advisors proposed that our conflicts committee and board of directors adopt an Allocation Process among us, KBS REIT II, KBS Growth & Income REIT and the SREIT. The board of directors and conflicts committee adopted the Allocation Process as proposed. See above, “Our advisor and its affiliates face conflicts of interest relating to the acquisition of assets, the leasing of properties and the disposition of properties due to their relationship with other KBS-sponsored programs and/or KBS-advised investors, which could result in decisions that are not in our best interest or the best interests of our stockholders.”
Delays we encounter in the selection, acquisition and development of income-producing properties or the acquisition or origination of other real estate investments would likely limit our ability to pay distributions to our stockholders and may reduce their overall returns.
We may pay lower dividends as an NAV REIT than we otherwise would.
As an NAV REIT, we may pay lower dividends than we otherwise would, because as a perpetual-life NAV REIT (1) we may have a greater interest in retaining the capital for new investments, increased liquidity or other general purposes and (2) we may have a greater interest in keeping our NAV stable or rising.
Our NAV REIT strategy may increase the compensation to our advisor and its affiliates.
Pursuant to our advisory agreement currently in effect with our advisor, our advisor is due a subordinated participation in our net cash flows upon meeting certain performance goals. After our stockholders have received, together as a collective group, aggregate distributions (including distributions that may constitute a return of capital for federal income tax purposes) sufficient to provide (i) a return of their net invested capital, or the amount calculated by multiplying the total number of shares purchased by stockholders by the issue price, reduced by any amounts to repurchase shares pursuant to our share redemption program, and (ii) an 8.0% per year cumulative, noncompounded return on such net invested capital, our advisor is entitled to receive 15.0% of our net cash flows, whether from continuing operations, net sale proceeds or otherwise. With respect to our historical performance period from inception through the launch of our first offering as an NAV REIT, we intend to calculate the estimated value of the subordinated participation in net cash flows to our advisor based on a hypothetical liquidation of our assets and liabilities at their then-current estimated values used in our NAV calculation at the time of conversion to an NAV REIT, after considering the impact of any potential closing costs and fees related to the disposition of real estate properties, and accelerate the payment of this historical incentive fee to our advisor to the extent of the potential liability at the time of conversion to an NAV REIT. Our stockholders approved the acceleration of this fee on May 7, 2020. The acceleration of the historical incentive fee is subject to further approval by the conflicts committee at the time of our conversion to an NAV REIT. Upon conversion to an NAV REIT, we would implement a new annual performance allocation for our advisor or its affiliate. To the extent payable, our advisor will benefit from the acceleration of this fee because (a) the value of the current incentive fee could go down in the future and (b) there is value in receiving compensation sooner rather than later. In connection with the determination of the November 1, 2021 estimated value per share of our common stock, our advisor determined that there would be no liability related to the subordinated participation in net cash flows at that time, based on a hypothetical liquidation of the assets and liabilities at their estimated fair values, after considering the impact of any potential closing costs and fees related to the disposition of real estate properties; however, changes to the fair values of assets and liabilities could have a material impact to the incentive fee calculation. The new fee structure also puts a greater emphasis on our performance and, accordingly, would result in greater compensation to our advisor or its affiliates as a percentage of our NAV if we perform sufficiently well. Furthermore if we succeed in raising additional capital and growing our company, we would expect the fees paid to our advisor and its affiliates to increase because of our larger size. We believe these changes help further align the interests of our advisor (and its affiliates) and our stockholders in growing our company and performing well. The actual future impact to our stockholders of the proposed compensation changes is difficult to predict because it is subject to a number of factors, such as the amount of capital we raise in our public offerings, the size or value of the portfolio, and our performance. See Part III, Item 13, “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director Independence - Report of the Conflicts Committee - Certain Transactions with Related Persons”.
Our advisor and its affiliates, including all of our executive officers, our affiliated director and other key real estate and debt finance professionals at our advisor, face conflicts of interest in the pursuit of an NAV REIT strategy.
All of our executive officers, our affiliated director and other key real estate and debt finance professionals at our advisor are also officers, directors, managers, or key professionals of and/or holders of a direct or indirect controlling interest in our advisor and other affiliated KBS entities. Charles J. Schreiber, Jr. is the Chairman of our Board, our Chief Executive Officer, our President and our affiliated director. Our advisor is owned and controlled by KBS Holdings LLC, our sponsor. Charles J. Schreiber, Jr. indirectly controls KBS Holdings and KBS Capital Advisors. Our advisor is also the external advisor to other public KBS-sponsored programs. In addition, Mr. Schreiber and the team of real estate professionals at KBS Capital Advisors are also key real estate professionals at KBS Realty Advisors and its affiliates, the advisors to the private KBS-sponsored programs, the investment advisors to KBS-advised investors and the U.S. asset manager for the SREIT. In addition, Mr. Schreiber is an executive officer and director of other public KBS-sponsored programs. KBS Holdings, KBS Capital Advisors and KBS Realty Advisors and the KBS team of real estate and debt finance professionals may also sponsor or advise programs or accounts in the future. Some of the material conflicts that our advisor and its affiliates face in connection with our pursuit of a perpetual-life strategy include the following:
•As described in the risk factor above, with respect to our historical performance period from inception through the launch of our first offering as an NAV REIT, we intend to calculate the estimated value of the subordinated participation in net cash flows to our advisor based on a hypothetical liquidation of our assets and liabilities at their then-current estimated values used in our NAV calculation at the time of conversion to an NAV REIT, after considering the impact of any potential closing costs and fees related to the disposition of real estate properties, and accelerate the payment of this historical incentive fee to our advisor to the extent of the potential liability at the time of conversion to an NAV REIT. Our stockholders approved the acceleration of this fee on May 7, 2020. The acceleration of the historical incentive fee is subject to further approval by the conflicts committee at the time of our conversion to an NAV REIT. Upon conversion to an NAV REIT, we would implement a new annual performance allocation for our advisor or its affiliate. To the extent payable, our advisor will benefit from the acceleration of this fee because (a) the value of the current incentive fee could go down in the future and (b) there is value in receiving compensation sooner rather than later. In connection with the determination of the November 1, 2021 estimated value per share of our common stock, our advisor determined that there would be no liability related to the subordinated participation in net cash flows at that time, based on a hypothetical liquidation of the assets and liabilities at their estimated fair values, after considering the impact of any potential closing costs and fees related to the disposition of real estate properties; however, changes to the fair values of assets and liabilities could have a material impact to the incentive fee calculation. The new fee structure also puts a greater emphasis on our performance and, accordingly, would result in greater compensation to our advisor or its affiliates as a percentage of our NAV if we perform sufficiently well. Furthermore if we succeed in raising additional capital and growing our company, we would expect the fees paid to our advisor and its affiliates to increase because of our larger size. We may implement other fee changes that are favorable to our advisor and its affiliates. In addition, a perpetual-life strategy is likely to extend the period in which our advisor and its affiliates may earn fees from us, in various forms, whether related to overall asset management or otherwise.
•The compensation payable by us to our advisor and its affiliates may not be on terms that would result from arm’s-length negotiations, may be payable whether or not our stockholders receive distributions, and may be based on our NAV, which our advisor is responsible for determining.
•The team of real estate and debt finance professionals at our advisor and its affiliates must determine which investment opportunities to recommend to us and the other KBS-sponsored programs that are raising funds for investment for whom KBS serves as an advisor as well as any programs KBS affiliates may sponsor in the future. Because investment opportunities that are suitable for us may also be suitable for other KBS-sponsored programs or KBS-advised investors, our advisor and its affiliates face conflicts of interest relating to the purchase of properties and other investments. Currently, the SREIT is also in its acquisition stage. In addition, in connection with the Singapore Transaction, our board of directors and conflicts committee adopted the Allocation Process (described above) among certain KBS-sponsored programs.
•Our sponsor and its team of professionals at our advisor and its affiliates have to allocate their time between us and other programs and activities in which they are involved.
See Part III, Item 13, “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director Independence - Report of the Conflicts Committee - Certain Transactions with Related Persons”.
General Risks Related to Investments in Real Estate
Economic, market and regulatory changes that impact the real estate market generally may decrease the value of our investments and weaken our operating results.
Our operating results and the performance of our real estate properties are subject to the risks typically associated with real estate, any of which could decrease the value of our investments and could weaken our operating results, including:
•downturns in national, regional and local economic conditions;
•competition from similar properties in the same or competing markets or submarkets;
•adverse local conditions, such as oversupply or reduction in demand for office and industrial properties and changes in real estate zoning laws that may reduce the desirability of real estate in an area;
•vacancies, changes in market rental rates and the need to periodically repair, renovate and re-let space;
•changes in interest rates and the availability of permanent mortgage financing, which may render the sale of a property or loan difficult or unattractive;
•changes in tax (including real and personal property tax), real estate, environmental and zoning laws;
•natural disasters such as hurricanes, earthquakes and floods;
•acts of war or terrorism, including the consequences of terrorist attacks, such as those that occurred on September 11, 2001;
•the potential for uninsured or underinsured property losses; and
•periods of high interest rates and tight money supply.
Any of the above factors, or a combination thereof, could result in a decrease in our cash flow from operations and a decrease in the value of our investments, which would have an adverse effect on our operations, on our ability to pay distributions to our stockholders and on the value of our stockholders’ investment.
If our acquisitions do not perform as expected, cash distributions to our stockholders may decline.
As of March 1, 2022, our real estate portfolio held for investment was composed of 16 office properties and one mixed-use office/retail property encompassing in the aggregate approximately 7.3 million rentable square feet and was collectively 84% occupied. We also own an investment in the equity securities of the SREIT, a Singapore real estate investment trust listed on the SGX-ST. We made these investments based on an underwriting analysis with respect to each asset and how the asset fits into our portfolio. If these assets do not perform as expected, we may have less cash flow from operating activities available to fund distributions and stockholder returns may be reduced.
Properties that have significant vacancies could result in lower revenues for us and be difficult to sell, which could diminish the return on these properties and adversely affect our ability to pay distributions to our stockholders.
A property may incur vacancies either by the expiration and non-renewal of tenant leases or the continued default of tenants under their leases. If vacancies continue for a long period of time, we may suffer reduced revenues resulting in less cash available for distribution to our stockholders. In addition, the resale value of the property could be diminished because the market value of a particular property depends principally upon the value of the cash flow generated by the leases associated with that property. Such a reduction in the resale value of a property could also reduce the value of our stockholders’ investment.
Further, some of our assets may be outfitted to suit the particular needs of the tenants. We may have difficulty replacing the tenants of these properties if the outfitted space limits the types of businesses that could lease that space without major renovation. If a tenant does not renew a lease or, terminates or defaults on a lease, we may be unable to lease the property for the rent previously received or sell the property without incurring a loss. Because the market value of a particular property depends principally upon the value of the cash flow generated by the leases associated with such property, we may incur a loss upon the sale of a property with significant vacant space. These events could cause us to reduce distributions to stockholders.
Based on the current market outlook, we expect our core focus in the U.S. office sector to reflect a value-creating core strategy, which is also known as a core-plus strategy. In many cases, these core properties will have slightly higher (10% to 20%) vacancy rates and/or higher near-term lease rollover at acquisition than more conservative value maintaining core properties. To the extent that we buy such properties, we may incur significant costs for capital expenditures and tenant improvement costs to lease up the properties, which increases the risk of loss associated with these properties compared to other properties.
We have invested in, and expect our core focus in the U.S. office sector to reflect a value-creating core strategy or core-plus strategy. In many cases, these core properties will have slightly higher (10% to 20%) vacancy rates, higher near-term lease rollover at acquisition than more conservative value maintaining core properties, and/or other characteristics that could provide an opportunity for us to achieve appreciation by increasing occupancy, negotiating new leases with higher rental rates and/or executing enhancement projects. We likely will need to fund reserves, maintain capacity under our credit facilities and/or use proceeds from offerings, including our dividend reinvestment plan, to fund capital expenditures, tenant improvements and other improvements in order to attract new tenants to these properties. To the extent we do not maintain adequate reserves to fund these costs, we may use our cash flow from operating activities, proceeds from offerings or borrowings to fund such costs. If we are unable to execute our business plan for these investments, the overall return on these investments will decrease.
We have entered into long-term leases with tenants at certain of our office properties and in the future we may enter into long-term leases with tenants at certain office properties we may acquire, which may not result in fair market rental rates over time.
We may enter into long-term leases with tenants of certain of our properties, or include renewal options that specify a maximum rate increase. These leases would provide for rent to increase over time; however, if we do not accurately judge the potential for increases in market rental rates, we may set the terms of these long-term leases at levels such that, even after contractual rent increases, the rent under our long-term leases is less than then-current market rates. Further, we may have no ability to terminate those leases or to adjust the rent to then-prevailing market rates. As a result, our cash available for distribution could be lower than if we did not enter into long-term leases.
We may be adversely affected by trends in the office real estate industry.
Some businesses are rapidly evolving to make employee telecommuting, flexible work schedules, open workplaces and teleconferencing increasingly common. These practices enable businesses to reduce their space requirements. A continuation of the movement towards these practices could over time erode the overall demand for office space and, in turn, place downward pressure on occupancy, rental rates and property valuations, each of which could have an adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations, cash flows and ability to make expected distributions to our stockholders.
Certain property types, such as industrial properties, that we may acquire may not have efficient alternative uses and, if we acquire such properties, we may have difficulty leasing them to new tenants and/or have to make significant capital expenditures to them to do so.
Certain property types, particularly industrial properties, can be difficult to lease to new tenants, should the current tenant terminate or choose not to renew its lease. These properties generally will have received significant tenant-specific improvements and only very specific tenants may be able to use such improvements, making the properties very difficult to re-lease in their current condition. We may be required to incur substantial costs to make industrial properties suitable for other industrial tenants. Additionally, an interested tenant may demand that, as a condition of executing a lease for the property, we finance and construct significant improvements so that the tenant could use the property. This expense may decrease cash available for distribution, as we likely would have to (i) pay for the improvements up front or (ii) finance the improvements at potentially unattractive terms.
To the extent we acquire retail properties with anchor tenants, our revenue will be significantly impacted by the success and economic viability of our retail anchor tenants. Our reliance on a single tenant or significant tenants in certain properties may decrease our ability to lease vacated space and adversely affect the returns on our stockholders’ investment in us.
In the retail sector, a tenant occupying all or a large portion of the gross leasable area of a retail center, commonly referred to as an anchor tenant, may become insolvent, may suffer a downturn in business and default on or terminate its lease, or may decide not to renew its lease. Any of these events would result in a reduction or cessation in rental payments to us from that tenant and would adversely affect our financial condition. A lease termination by an anchor tenant could result in lease terminations or reductions in rent by other tenants whose leases may permit cancellation or rent reduction if an anchor tenant’s lease is terminated. In such event, we may be unable to re-lease the vacated space. Similarly, the leases of some anchor tenants may permit those anchor tenants to transfer their leases to other retailers. The transfer to a new anchor tenant could cause customer traffic in the retail center to decrease and thereby reduce the income generated by that retail center. A lease transfer to a new anchor tenant could also allow other tenants, under the terms of their respective leases, to make reduced rental payments or to terminate their leases. In the event that we are unable to re-lease the vacated space to a new anchor tenant, we may incur additional expenses in order to renovate and subdivide the space to be able to re-lease the space to more than one tenant.
Our retail tenants will face competition from numerous retail channels and may be disproportionately affected by economic conditions. These events could reduce the profitability of our retail properties and affect our ability to pay distributions.
Retailers will face continued competition from shopping via the Internet, discount or value retailers, factory outlet centers, wholesale clubs and mail order catalogues and operators. Such conditions could adversely affect our retail tenants and, consequently, our funds available for distribution.
If we invest in apartment communities, competition from other apartment communities for tenants could reduce our profitability and the return on our stockholders’ investment.
The apartment community industry is highly competitive. This competition could reduce occupancy levels and revenues at any apartment communities we own and operate, which would adversely affect our operations. If we invest in apartment communities, we will face competition from other apartment communities both in the immediate vicinity and in the larger geographic market where any apartment communities we operate are located. Overbuilding of apartment communities may occur. If so, this will increase the number of apartment units available and may decrease occupancy and apartment rental rates. In addition, increases in operating costs due to inflation may not be offset by increased apartment rental rates.
We depend on tenants for our revenue generated by our real estate investments and, accordingly, our revenue generated by our real estate investments and our ability to pay distributions to our stockholders are partially dependent upon the success and economic viability of our tenants and our ability to retain and attract tenants. Non-renewals, terminations or lease defaults could reduce our net income and limit our ability to pay distributions to our stockholders.
The success of our real estate investments materially depends upon the financial stability of the tenants leasing the properties we own. The inability of a single major tenant or a significant number of smaller tenants to meet their rental obligations would significantly lower our net income. A non-renewal after the expiration of a lease term, termination or default by a tenant on its lease payments to us would cause us to lose the revenue associated with such lease and require us to find an alternative source of revenue to meet mortgage payments and prevent a foreclosure if the property is subject to a mortgage. In the event of a tenant default or bankruptcy, we may experience delays in enforcing our rights as landlord of a property and may incur substantial costs in protecting our investment and re-leasing the property. Tenants may have the right to terminate their leases upon the occurrence of certain customary events of default and, in other circumstances, may not renew their leases or, because of market conditions, may only be able to renew their leases on terms that are less favorable to us than the terms of their initial leases.
The bankruptcy or insolvency of our tenants or delays by our tenants in making rental payments could seriously harm our operating results and financial condition.
Any bankruptcy filings by or relating to any of our tenants could bar us from collecting pre-bankruptcy debts from that tenant, unless we receive an order permitting us to do so from the bankruptcy court. A tenant bankruptcy could delay our efforts to collect past due balances under the relevant leases, and could ultimately preclude full collection of these sums. If a lease is rejected by a tenant in bankruptcy, we would have only a general unsecured claim for damages. Any unsecured claim we hold against a bankrupt entity may be paid only to the extent that funds are available and only in the same percentage as is paid to all other holders of unsecured claims. We may recover substantially less than the full value of any unsecured claims, which would harm our financial condition.
Our inability to sell a property at the time and on the terms we want could limit our ability to pay distributions to our stockholders and could reduce the value of our stockholders’ investment in us.
Many factors that are beyond our control affect the real estate market and could affect our ability to sell properties for the price, on the terms or within the time frame that we desire. These factors include general economic conditions, the availability of financing, interest rates and other factors, including supply and demand. Because real estate investments are relatively illiquid, we have a limited ability to vary our portfolio in response to changes in economic or other conditions. Further, before we can sell a property on the terms we want, it may be necessary to expend funds to correct defects or to make improvements. However, we can give no assurance that we will have the funds available to correct such defects or to make such improvements. We may be unable to sell our properties at a profit. Our inability to sell properties at the time and on the terms we want could reduce our cash flow, limit our ability to pay distributions to our stockholders and reduce the value of our stockholders’ investment in us.
If we sell a property by providing financing to the purchaser, we will bear the risk of default by the purchaser, which could delay or reduce cash available for distribution to our stockholders.
When we decide to sell properties, we intend to use our best efforts to sell them for cash; however, in some instances, we may sell our properties by providing financing to purchasers. When we provide financing to a purchaser, we will bear the risk that the purchaser may default, which could reduce our cash distributions to stockholders. Even in the absence of a purchaser default, the distribution of the proceeds of the sale to our stockholders, or the reinvestment of the proceeds in other assets, will be delayed until the promissory note or other property we may accept upon a sale is actually paid, sold, refinanced or otherwise disposed.
Potential development and construction delays and resultant increased costs and risks may hinder our operating results and decrease our net income.
From time to time we may acquire unimproved real property or properties that are under development or construction. Investments in such properties will be subject to the uncertainties associated with the development and construction of real property, including those related to re-zoning land for development, environmental concerns of governmental entities and/or community groups and our builders’ ability to build in conformity with plans, specifications, budgeted costs and timetables. If a builder fails to perform, we may resort to legal action to rescind the purchase or the construction contract or to compel performance. A builder’s performance may also be affected or delayed by conditions beyond the builder’s control. Delays in completing construction could also give tenants the right to terminate preconstruction leases. We may incur additional risks when we make periodic progress payments or other advances to builders before they complete construction. These and other factors can result in increased costs of a project or loss of our investment. In addition, we will be subject to normal lease-up risks relating to newly-constructed projects. We also must rely on rental income and expense projections and estimates of the fair market value of property upon completion of construction when agreeing upon a purchase price at the time we acquire the property. If our projections are inaccurate, we may pay too much for a property, and the return on our investment could suffer.
Actions of our joint venture partners could reduce the returns on joint venture investments and decrease our stockholders’ overall return.
We may enter into joint ventures to acquire properties and other assets. We may also purchase and develop additional properties in partnerships, co-tenancies or other co-ownership arrangements. Such investments may involve risks not otherwise present with other methods of investment, including, for example, the following risks:
•that our co-venturer, co-tenant or partner in an investment could become insolvent or bankrupt;
•that such co-venturer, co-tenant or partner may at any time have economic or business interests or goals that are or that become inconsistent with our business interests or goals;
•that such co-venturer, co-tenant or partner may be in a position to take action contrary to our instructions or requests or contrary to our policies or objectives; or
•that disputes between us and our co-venturer, co-tenant or partner may result in litigation or arbitration that would increase our expenses and prevent our officers and directors from focusing their time and effort on our operations.
Any of the above might subject a property to liabilities in excess of those contemplated and thus reduce our returns on that investment and the value of our stockholders’ investment in us.
Costs imposed pursuant to laws and governmental regulations may reduce our net income and our cash available for distribution to our stockholders.
Real property and the operations conducted on real property are subject to federal, state and local laws and regulations relating to protection of the environment and human health. We could be subject to liability in the form of fines, penalties or damages for noncompliance with these laws and regulations. These laws and regulations generally govern wastewater discharges, air emissions, the operation and removal of underground and above-ground storage tanks, the use, storage, treatment, transportation and disposal of solid and hazardous materials, the remediation of contamination associated with the release or disposal of solid and hazardous materials, the presence of toxic building materials and other health and safety-related concerns.
Some of these laws and regulations may impose joint and several liability on the tenants, owners or operators of real property for the costs to investigate or remediate contaminated properties, regardless of fault, whether the contamination occurred prior to purchase, or whether the acts causing the contamination were legal. Our tenants’ operations, the condition of properties at the time we buy them, operations in the vicinity of our properties, such as the presence of underground storage tanks, or activities of unrelated third parties may affect our properties.
The presence of hazardous substances, or the failure to properly manage or remediate these substances, may hinder our ability to sell, rent or pledge such property as collateral for future borrowings. Any material expenditures, fines, penalties or damages we must pay will reduce our ability to pay distributions to our stockholders and may reduce the value of our stockholders’ investment in us.
The costs of defending against claims of environmental liability, of complying with environmental regulatory requirements, of remediating any contaminated property or of paying personal injury or other damage claims could reduce our cash available for distribution to our stockholders.
Under various federal, state and local environmental laws, ordinances and regulations, a current or previous real property owner or operator may be liable for the cost of removing or remediating hazardous or toxic substances on, under or in such property. These costs could be substantial. Such laws often impose liability whether or not the owner or operator knew of, or was responsible for, the presence of such hazardous or toxic substances. Environmental laws also may impose liens on property or restrictions on the manner in which property may be used or businesses may be operated, and these restrictions may require substantial expenditures or prevent us from entering into leases with prospective tenants that may be impacted by such laws. Environmental laws provide for sanctions for noncompliance and may be enforced by governmental agencies or, in certain circumstances, by private parties. Certain environmental laws and common law principles could be used to impose liability for the release of and exposure to hazardous substances, including asbestos-containing materials and lead-based paint. Third parties may seek recovery from real property owners or operators for personal injury or property damage associated with exposure to released hazardous substances and governments may seek recovery for natural resource damage. The costs of defending against claims of environmental liability, of complying with environmental regulatory requirements, of remediating any contaminated property, or of paying personal injury, property damage or natural resource damage claims could reduce our cash available for distribution to our stockholders.
All of our real estate properties are subject to Phase I environmental assessments prior to the time they are acquired; however, such assessments may not provide complete environmental histories due, for example, to limited available information about prior operations at the properties or other gaps in information at the time we acquire the property. A Phase I environmental assessment is an initial environmental investigation to identify potential environmental liabilities associated with the current and past uses of a given property. If any of our properties were found to contain hazardous or toxic substances after our acquisition, the value of our investment could decrease below the amount paid for such investment. In addition, real estate-related investments in which we invest may be secured by properties with recognized environmental conditions. Where we are secured creditors, we will attempt to acquire contractual agreements, including environmental indemnities, that protect us from losses arising out of environmental problems in the event the property is transferred by foreclosure or bankruptcy; however, no assurances can be given that such indemnities would fully protect us from responsibility for costs associated with addressing any environmental problems related to such properties.
Costs associated with complying with the Americans with Disabilities Act may decrease our cash available for distribution.
Our properties may be subject to the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, as amended, or the Disabilities Act. Under the Disabilities Act, all places of public accommodation are required to comply with federal requirements related to access and use by disabled persons. The Disabilities Act has separate compliance requirements for “public accommodations” and “commercial facilities” that generally require that buildings and services be made accessible and available to people with disabilities. The Disabilities Act’s requirements could require removal of access barriers and could result in the imposition of injunctive relief, monetary penalties or, in some cases, an award of damages. Any funds used for Disabilities Act compliance will reduce our net income and the amount of cash available for distribution to our stockholders.
Uninsured losses relating to real property or excessively expensive premiums for insurance coverage could reduce our cash flow from operations and the return on our stockholders’ investment in us.
There are types of losses, generally catastrophic in nature, such as losses due to wars, acts of terrorism, earthquakes, floods, hurricanes, pollution or environmental matters, that are uninsurable or not economically insurable, or may be insured subject to limitations, such as large deductibles or co-payments. Insurance risks associated with potential acts of terrorism could sharply increase the premiums we pay for coverage against property and casualty claims. We may not be able to obtain insurance against the risk of terrorism because it may not be available or may not be available on terms that are economically feasible. The terrorism insurance that we obtain may not be sufficient to cover loss for damages to our properties as a result of terrorist attacks. The inability to obtain sufficient terrorism insurance or any terrorism insurance at all could limit our financing and refinancing options as mortgage lenders sometimes require that specific coverage against terrorism be purchased by commercial owners as a condition for providing loans. In such instances, we may be required to provide other financial support, either through financial assurances or self-insurance, to cover potential losses. We may not have adequate coverage for such losses. If any of our properties incurs a casualty loss that is not fully insured, the value of our assets will be reduced by any such uninsured loss, which will reduce the value of our stockholders’ investment in us. In addition, other than any working capital reserve or other reserves we may establish, we have limited sources of funding to repair or reconstruct any uninsured property. Also, to the extent we must pay unexpectedly large amounts for insurance, we could suffer reduced earnings that would result in lower distributions to our stockholders.
We rely on property managers to operate our properties and leasing agents to lease vacancies in our properties.
Our advisor hires property managers to manage our properties and leasing agents to lease vacancies in our properties. The property managers have significant decision-making authority with respect to the management of our properties. Our ability to direct and control how our properties are managed on a day-to-day basis may be limited because we engage other parties to perform this function. Thus, the success of our business may depend in large part on the ability of our property managers to manage the day-to-day operations and the ability of our leasing agents to lease vacancies in our properties. Any adversity experienced by, or problems in our relationship with, our property managers or leasing agents could adversely impact the operation and profitability of our properties.
Risks Related to Real Estate-Related Investments
Any real estate-related investments we make will be subject to the risks typically associated with real estate.
Any investments we make in real estate loans generally will be directly or indirectly secured by a lien on real property (or the equity interests in an entity that owns real property) that, upon the occurrence of a default on the loan, could result in our taking ownership of the property. The values of these properties may change after the dates of acquisition or origination of the loans. If the values of the underlying properties drop, our risk will increase because of the lower value of the security associated with such loans. In this manner, real estate values could impact the values of any loan investments we make. Our equity investment in the SREIT and any future investments we make in real estate-related debt and equity securities and other real estate-related investments may be similarly affected by real estate property values. Therefore, any real estate-related investments we make will be subject to the risks typically associated with real estate, which are described above under the heading “- General Risks Related to Investments in Real Estate.”
Any investments we make in real estate loans will be subject to interest rate fluctuations that will affect our returns as compared to market interest rates; accordingly, the value of our stockholders’ investment in us will be subject to fluctuations in interest rates.
With respect to fixed rate, long-term loans receivable, if interest rates rise, the loans could yield a return that is lower than then-current market rates. If interest rates decrease, we will be adversely affected to the extent that loans are prepaid because we may not be able to reinvest the proceeds at as high of an interest rate. If we invest in variable-rate loans receivable and interest rates decrease, our revenues will also decrease. For these reasons, investments in real estate loans, returns on those loans and the value of our stockholders’ investment in us would be subject to fluctuations in interest rates.
The mortgage loans in which we may invest will be subject to delinquency, foreclosure and loss, which could result in losses to us.
Commercial real estate loans generally are secured by commercial real estate properties and are subject to risks of delinquency and foreclosure. The ability of a borrower to repay a loan secured by an income-producing property typically is dependent primarily upon the successful operation of such property rather than upon the existence of independent income or assets of the borrower. If the net operating income of the property is reduced, the borrower’s ability to repay the loan may be impaired. Net operating income of an income-producing property can be affected by, among other things: tenant mix, success of tenant businesses, occupancy rates, property management decisions, property location and condition, competition from comparable types of properties, changes in laws that increase operating expenses or limit rents that may be charged, any need to address environmental contamination at the property, the occurrence of any uninsured casualty at the property, changes in national, regional or local economic conditions and/or specific industry segments, declines in regional or local real estate values, declines in regional or local rental or occupancy rates, increases in interest rates, real estate tax rates and other operating expenses, changes in governmental rules, fiscal policies and regulations (including environmental legislation), natural disasters, terrorism, social unrest and civil disturbances.
In the event of any default under any mortgage loan we may acquire, we will bear a risk of loss of principal and accrued interest to the extent of any deficiency between the value of the collateral and the principal and accrued interest of the mortgage loan, which could have a material adverse effect on our cash flow from operations. Foreclosure on a property securing a mortgage loan can be an expensive and lengthy process that could have a substantial negative effect on our anticipated return on the investment. In the event of the bankruptcy of a mortgage loan borrower, the mortgage loan to such borrower will be deemed to be secured only to the extent of the value of the underlying collateral at the time of bankruptcy (as determined by the bankruptcy court), and the lien securing the mortgage loan will be subject to the avoidance powers of the bankruptcy trustee or debtor-in-possession to the extent the lien is unenforceable under state law.
Our investment in common equity securities is, and any future investments we make in the securities of other issuers will be, subject to the specific risks relating to the particular issuer of the securities and may involve greater risk of loss than secured debt financings.
We have made a significant investment in the common equity of the SREIT and may make equity investments in funds or corporate entities with a primary focus on the commercial real estate and real estate finance industries or with significant exposure to real estate, such as REITs. We may purchase the common or preferred stock of these entities or purchase or write options with respect to their stock. We may also invest in debt securities and preferred equity securities issued by funds or corporate entities with a primary focus on the commercial real estate and real estate finance industries or with significant exposure to real estate. Our investments in debt securities and preferred and common equity securities will involve special risks relating to the particular issuer of the securities, including the financial condition and business outlook of the issuer. Issuers that are REITs and other real estate companies are subject to the inherent risks associated with real estate investments. Furthermore, debt securities and preferred and common equity securities may involve greater risk of loss than secured debt financings due to a variety of factors, including that such investments are generally unsecured and may also be subordinated to other obligations of the issuer. As a result, investments in debt securities and preferred and common equity securities are subject to risks of (i) limited liquidity in the secondary trading market, (ii) substantial market price volatility resulting from changes in prevailing interest rates, (iii) subordination to the claims of banks and senior lenders to the issuer, (iv) the operation of mandatory sinking fund or call/redemption provisions during periods of declining interest rates that could cause the issuer to reinvest redemption proceeds in lower yielding assets, (v) the possibility that earnings of the issuer may be insufficient to meet its debt service and distribution obligations, and (vi) the declining creditworthiness and potential for insolvency of the issuer during periods of rising interest rates and economic downturn. These risks may adversely affect the value of outstanding debt securities and preferred and common equity securities and the ability of the issuers thereof to make principal, interest and/or distribution payments to us.
Our significant investment in the SREIT is subject to the risks inherent in investing in traded securities. As of March 31, 2022, based solely on the closing trading price of the units of the SREIT on the SGX-ST of $0.755 per unit on such date and without taking into account any potential discount for the holding period risk due to the quantity of units held by us relative to the normal level of trading in the units, we owned approximately $163.0 million of units in the SREIT, representing an approximate 18.4% interest in the units of the SREIT. The SREIT’s units were first listed for trading on the SGX-ST on July 19, 2019. If an active trading market for the units does not develop or is not sustained, it may be difficult to sell our units. The market for Singapore REITs may trade a small number of securities and may be unable to respond effectively to increases in trading volume, potentially making prompt liquidation of our investment in the SREIT difficult. Even if an active trading market develops or we are able to negotiate block trades, if we or other significant investors sell or are perceived as intending to sell a substantial amount of units in a short period of time, the market price of our remaining units could be adversely affected. In addition, as a foreign equity investment, the trading price of units of the SREIT may be affected by political, economic, financial and social factors in the Singapore and Asian markets, including changes in government, economic and fiscal policies. Furthermore, we may be limited in our ability to sell our investment in the SREIT if our advisor and/or its affiliates are deemed to have material, non-public information regarding the SREIT. Charles J. Schreiber, Jr., the Chairman of our Board, our Chief Executive Officer, our President and our affiliated director, is a former director of the external manager of the SREIT, and Mr. Schreiber holds an indirect ownership interest in the external manager of the SREIT. An affiliate of our advisor serves as the U.S. asset manager to the SREIT. The inability to dispose of our investment in the SREIT at the time and on the terms we want could materially adversely affect the investment results.
Risks Associated with Debt Financing
We obtain lines of credit, mortgage indebtedness and other borrowings and have given guarantees, which increases our risk of loss due to potential foreclosure.
We obtain lines of credit and long-term financing secured by our properties and other assets and other borrowings. We have acquired our real estate properties by financing a portion of the price of the properties and mortgaging or pledging some or all of the properties purchased as security for that debt. We may also incur mortgage debt on properties that we already own in order to obtain funds to acquire additional properties, to fund property improvements and other capital expenditures, to pay distributions, to fund redemptions under our share redemption program and for other purposes. In addition, we may borrow as necessary or advisable to ensure that we maintain our qualification as a REIT for federal income tax purposes, including borrowings to satisfy the REIT requirement that we distribute at least 90% of our annual REIT taxable income to our stockholders (computed without regard to the dividends-paid deduction and excluding net capital gain). However, we can give our stockholders no assurance that we will be able to obtain such borrowings on satisfactory terms or at all.
If we mortgage a property and there is a shortfall between the cash flow generated by that property and the cash flow needed to service mortgage debt on that property, then the amount of cash available for distribution to our stockholders may be reduced. In addition, incurring mortgage debt increases the risk of loss of a property since defaults on indebtedness secured by a property may result in lenders initiating foreclosure actions. In that case, we could lose the property securing the loan that is in default, reducing the value of our stockholders’ investment in us. For tax purposes, a foreclosure of any of our properties would be treated as a sale of the property for a purchase price equal to the outstanding balance of the debt secured by the mortgage. If the outstanding balance of the debt secured by the mortgage exceeds our tax basis in the property, we would recognize taxable income on foreclosure even though we would not necessarily receive any cash proceeds. We have given and may give full or partial guarantees to lenders of mortgage or other debt on behalf of the entities that own our properties. When we give a guaranty on behalf of an entity that owns one of our properties, we will be responsible to the lender for satisfaction of all or a part of the debt or other amounts related to the debt if it is not paid by such entity. If any mortgages contain cross-collateralization or cross-default provisions, a default on a mortgage secured by a single property could affect mortgages secured by other properties.
Many of these same issues also apply to credit facilities which are expected to be in place at various times as well. For example, the loan documents for such facilities may include various coverage ratios, the continued compliance with which may not be completely within our control. If such coverage ratios are not met, the lenders under such credit facilities may declare any unfunded commitments to be terminated and declare any amounts outstanding to be due and payable. Credit facilities may be secured by our properties or unsecured. If we have insufficient income to service our recourse debt obligations, our lenders could institute proceedings against us to foreclose upon our assets. If a lender successfully forecloses upon any of our assets, our ability to pay cash distributions to our stockholders will be limited and our stockholders could lose all or part of their investment in us.
High mortgage rates or changes in underwriting standards may make it difficult for us to finance or refinance properties, which could reduce the number of properties we can acquire, our cash flow from operations and the amount of cash available for distribution to our stockholders.
If mortgage debt is unavailable at reasonable rates, we may not be able to finance the purchase of properties. If we place mortgage debt on a property, we run the risk of being unable to refinance part or all of the debt when it becomes due or of being unable to refinance on favorable terms. If interest rates are higher when we refinance properties subject to mortgage debt, our income could be reduced. We may be unable to finance or refinance or may only be able to partly finance or refinance properties if underwriting standards, including loan to value ratios and yield requirements, among other requirements, are more strict. If any of these events occurs, our cash flow could be reduced and/or we might have to pay down existing mortgages. This, in turn, would reduce cash available for distribution to our stockholders, could cause us to require additional capital and may hinder our ability to raise capital by issuing more stock or by borrowing more money.
We may not be able to access financing sources on attractive terms, which could adversely affect our ability to execute our business plan.
We may finance our assets over the long-term through a variety of means, including credit facilities and other structured financings. Our ability to execute this strategy will depend on various conditions in the markets for financing in this manner that are beyond our control, including lack of liquidity and greater credit spreads. We cannot be certain that these markets will remain an efficient source of long-term financing for our assets. If our strategy is not viable, we will have to find alternative forms of long-term financing for our assets, as secured revolving credit facilities may not accommodate long-term financing. This could subject us to more recourse indebtedness and the risk that debt service on less efficient forms of financing would require a larger portion of our cash flow, thereby reducing cash available for distribution to our stockholders and funds available for operations as well as for future business opportunities.
Lenders may require us to enter into restrictive covenants relating to our operations, which could limit our ability to pay distributions to our stockholders.
When providing financing, a lender may impose restrictions on us that affect our distribution and operating policies and our ability to incur additional debt. Loan agreements into which we enter may contain financial and other affirmative and negative covenants, including provisions that limit our ability to further mortgage a property, that require that we comply with various coverage ratios, that prohibit us from discontinuing insurance coverage or that prohibit us from replacing our advisor. These or other limitations would decrease our operating flexibility and our ability to achieve our operating objectives and limit our ability to pay distributions to our stockholders.
Increases in interest rates and the discontinuation of LIBOR could increase the amount of our interest and/or hedge payments and/or mitigate the effectiveness of our interest rate hedges.
As of December 31, 2021, our debt obligations consisted of $123.0 million of fixed rate notes payable and $1.3 billion of variable rate notes payable. As of December 31, 2021, the interest rates on $1.1 billion of our variable rate notes payable were effectively fixed through interest rate swap agreements. We expect that we will incur additional indebtedness in the future. Interest we pay reduces our cash available for distributions. Since we have incurred and may continue to incur variable rate debt, increases in interest rates raise our interest costs, which reduces our cash flows and our ability to make distributions to you. In addition, if we need to repay existing debt during periods of rising interest rates, we could be required to sell one or more of our properties at times or on terms which may not permit realization of the maximum return on such investments. Increases in interest rates may cause our operations to suffer and the amount of distributions our stockholders receive and their overall return on investment may decline.
We currently pay interest under certain of our debt at an interest rate that is determined based on a US Dollar London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”). On March 5, 2021, the United Kingdom’s Financial Conduct Authority (the “FCA”), which regulates LIBOR, announced that all LIBOR settings will either cease to be provided by any administrator or no longer be representative (i) immediately after December 31, 2021, in the case of the 1-week and 2-month US dollar settings; and (ii) immediately after June 30, 2023, in the case of the remaining US dollar settings. The tenors that were extended to June 30, 2023 are more widely used and are the tenors used in our LIBOR-based debt.
As a result, the Alternative Reference Rates Committee (“ARRC”), a steering committee comprised of U.S. financial market participants, published model LIBOR replacement language for use in bilateral and syndicated loan facilities. ARRC selected the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (“SOFR”) as the replacement to LIBOR. SOFR is a broad measure of the cost of borrowing cash in the overnight U.S. treasury repo market and is a rate published by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York.
On October 23, 2020, the International Swaps and Derivatives Association (“ISDA”), the trade association for the derivatives marketplace, published the ISDA IBOR Fallbacks Protocol (the “Protocol”) and the ISDA IBOR Fallbacks Supplement (the “Supplement”), which became effective on January 25, 2021. The Protocol incorporates LIBOR transition provisions into non-cleared derivatives transactions that reference LIBOR and were entered into before January 25, 2021 between parties to derivatives transactions that each have adhered to the Protocol. The Supplement automatically incorporates these LIBOR transition provisions into non-cleared derivatives transactions that reference LIBOR and are entered into on or after January 25, 2021. We currently are not adherents to the Protocol. Any interest rate hedges that reference LIBOR and that we entered into on or after January 25, 2021 and that incorporate the 2006 ISDA Definitions are subject to conversion based on the ISDA methodology set forth in the Supplement. In 2021, ISDA published the 2021 ISDA Interest Rate Derivatives Definitions (the “2021 Definitions”). Any interest rate hedges that reference LIBOR and that incorporate the ISDA 2021 Definitions are subject to conversion based on the ISDA methodology set forth in the 2021 Definitions. The spread adjustments to be used in connection with the transition from LIBOR to SOFR under any of our hedging agreements have been fixed pursuant to ISDA’s conversion methodology. These spread adjustments are expected to be the same regardless of whether the conversion occurs under the terms of the Protocol, the Supplement or the 2021 Definitions.
Differences between ARRC and ISDA LIBOR replacement methodology could result in differences in conversion between our debt instruments and corresponding hedges. Mismatches could occur resulting from conversion at different times, into different benchmark replacement rates, or into the same benchmark replacement rates calculated at different times or using different methods of calculation. In addition, in 2021 we entered into certain loans benchmarked to the Bloomberg Short-Term Bank Yield Index (“BSBY”) and, in certain cases, entered into hedges benchmarked to LIBOR. Accordingly, there is a mismatch between the benchmark interest rate under those loans and the floating rate under our hedges. That mismatch is expected to continue assuming the floating rate referenced in those hedges converts in accordance with their terms to replacement benchmark rate (which is expected to be SOFR) under the ISDA conversion methodology.
The transition from LIBOR to an alternative reference rate could result in higher all-in interest costs and could hinder our ability to maintain effective hedges, which could impact our financial performance. Furthermore, the impact or potential impact of LIBOR transition could incentivize us to prepay debt and/or unwind hedge positions earlier than we anticipated when closing the debt facility and/or entering into the hedge position. If we prepay debt, we may owe prepayment penalties or other breakage costs. If we unwind hedge positions, we could owe unwind payments to our counterparties, which could be significant. For hedges entered into before January 25, 2021, if we do not subsequently adhere to the Protocol, negotiate bilateral solutions with our counterparties, or unwind our positions before the discontinuation of LIBOR, it may be impossible for us or our counterparties to perform under these hedges following the discontinuation of LIBOR.
We have broad authority to incur debt and high debt levels could limit the amount of cash we have available to distribute to our stockholders and decrease the value of our stockholders’ investment in us.
We expect our debt financing and other liabilities to be between 45% and 65% of the cost of our tangible assets (before deducting depreciation or other non-cash reserves). There is no limitation on the amount we may borrow for the purchase of any single asset. Our charter limits our aggregate borrowings to 300% of our net assets, which approximates aggregate liabilities of 75% of the cost of our tangible assets (before deducting depreciation or other non-cash reserves), meaning that our borrowings and other liabilities may exceed our maximum target leverage of 65% of the cost of our tangible assets without violating the borrowing restrictions in our charter. We may exceed our charter limit only if a majority of the conflicts committee approves each borrowing in excess of our charter limitation and we disclose such borrowings to our stockholders in our next quarterly report with an explanation from the conflicts committee of the justification for the excess borrowing. As of December 31, 2021, our borrowings and other liabilities were approximately 54% of both the cost (before deducting depreciation and other noncash reserves) and book value (before deducting depreciation) of our tangible assets. High debt levels would cause us to incur higher interest charges and higher debt service payments and may also be accompanied by restrictive covenants. These factors could limit the amount of cash we have available to distribute to our stockholders and could result in a decline in the value of our stockholders’ investment in us.
In certain cases, financings for our properties may be recourse to us or certain of our subsidiaries.
Generally, commercial real estate financings are structured as non-recourse to the borrower, which limits a lender’s recourse to the property pledged as collateral for the loan, and not the other assets of the borrower or to any parent of the borrower, in the event of a loan default. However, lenders customarily will require that a creditworthy parent entity enter into so-called “recourse carveout” guarantees to protect the lender against certain bad-faith or other intentional acts of the borrower in violation of the loan documents. A “bad boy” guarantee typically provides that the lender can recover losses from the guarantors for certain bad acts, such as fraud or intentional misrepresentation, intentional waste, willful misconduct, criminal acts, misappropriation of funds, voluntary incurrence of prohibited debt and environmental losses sustained by lender. In addition, “bad boy” guarantees typically provide that the loan will be a full personal recourse obligation of the guarantor, for certain actions, such as prohibited transfers of the collateral or changes of control and voluntary bankruptcy of the borrower. It is expected that the financing arrangements with respect to our investments generally will require “bad boy” guarantees from certain of our subsidiaries that are the parent to the borrower entity. In the event that such a guarantee is called, our assets could be adversely affected.
Hedging against interest rate exposure may adversely affect our earnings, limit our gains or result in losses, which could adversely affect cash available for distribution to our stockholders.
We have entered into and in the future may enter into interest rate swap agreements or pursue other interest rate hedging strategies. Our hedging activity will vary in scope based on the level of interest rates, the type of investments we hold, and other changing market conditions. Interest rate hedging may fail to protect or could adversely affect us because, among other things:
•interest rate hedging can be expensive, particularly during periods of rising and volatile interest rates;
•available interest rate hedging products may not correspond directly with the interest rate risk for which protection is sought;
•the duration of the hedge may not match the duration of the related liability or asset;
•the amount of income that a REIT may earn from hedging transactions to offset losses due to fluctuations in interest rates is limited by federal tax provisions governing REITs;
•the credit quality of the party owing money on the hedge may be downgraded to such an extent that it impairs our ability to sell or assign our side of the hedging transaction;
•the party owing money in the hedging transaction may default on its obligation to pay; and
•we may purchase a hedge that turns out not to be necessary, i.e., a hedge that is out of the money.
Any hedging activity we engage in may adversely affect our earnings, which could adversely affect cash available for distribution to our stockholders. Therefore, while we may enter into such transactions to seek to reduce interest rate risks, unanticipated changes in interest rates may result in poorer overall investment performance than if we had not engaged in any such hedging transactions. In addition, the degree of correlation between price movements of the instruments used in a hedging strategy and price movements in the investments being hedged or liabilities being hedged may vary materially. Moreover, for a variety of reasons, we may not seek to establish a perfect correlation between such hedging instruments and the interest rate risk sought to be hedged. Any such imperfect correlation may prevent us from achieving the intended accounting treatment and may expose us to risk of loss.
We assume the credit risk of our counterparties with respect to derivative transactions.
We enter into derivative contracts for risk management purposes to hedge our exposure to cash flow variability caused by changing interest rates on our variable rate notes payable and we may enter into such contracts for any variable rate real estate loans receivable we acquire or originate. These derivative contracts generally are entered into with bank counterparties and are not traded on an organized exchange or guaranteed by a central clearing organization. We would therefore assume the credit risk that our counterparties will fail to make periodic payments when due under these contracts or become insolvent. If a counterparty fails to make a required payment, becomes the subject of a bankruptcy case, or otherwise defaults under the applicable contract, we would have the right to terminate all outstanding derivative transactions with that counterparty and settle them based on their net market value or replacement cost. In such an event, we may be required to make a termination payment to the counterparty, or we may have the right to collect a termination payment from such counterparty. We assume the credit risk that the counterparty will not be able to make any termination payment owing to us. We may not receive any collateral from a counterparty, or we may receive collateral that is insufficient to satisfy the counterparty’s obligation to make a termination payment. If a counterparty is the subject of a bankruptcy case, we will be an unsecured creditor in such case unless the counterparty has pledged sufficient collateral to us to satisfy the counterparty’s obligations to us.
We assume the risk that our derivative counterparty may terminate transactions early.
If we fail to make a required payment or otherwise default under the terms of a derivative contract, the counterparty would have the right to terminate all outstanding derivative transactions between us and that counterparty and settle them based on their net market value or replacement cost. In certain circumstances, the counterparty may have the right to terminate derivative transactions early even if we are not defaulting. If our derivative transactions are terminated early, it may not be possible for us to replace those transactions with another counterparty, on as favorable terms or at all.
We may be required to collateralize our derivative transactions.
We may be required to secure our obligations to our counterparties under our derivative contracts by pledging collateral to our counterparties. That collateral may be in the form of cash, securities or other assets. If we default under a derivative contract with a counterparty, or if a counterparty otherwise terminates one or more derivative contracts early, that counterparty may apply such collateral toward our obligation to make a termination payment to the counterparty. If we have pledged securities or other assets, the counterparty may liquidate those assets in order to satisfy our obligations. If we are required to post cash or securities as collateral, such cash or securities will not be available for use in our business. Cash or securities pledged to counterparties may be repledged by counterparties and may not be held in segregated accounts. Therefore, in the event of a counterparty insolvency, we may not be entitled to recover some or all collateral pledged to that counterparty, which could result in losses and have an adverse effect on our operations.
Our investments in derivatives are carried at estimated fair value as determined by us and, as a result, there may be uncertainty as to the value of these instruments.
Our investments in derivatives are recorded at fair value but have limited liquidity and are not publicly traded. The fair value of our derivatives may not be readily determinable. We will estimate the fair value of any such investments on a quarterly basis. Because such valuations are inherently uncertain, may fluctuate over short periods of time and may be based on numerous estimates, our determinations of fair value may differ materially from the values that would have been used if a ready market for these investments existed. The value of our common stock could be adversely affected if our determinations regarding the fair value of these investments are materially higher than the values that we ultimately realize upon their disposal or maturity.
Federal Income Tax Risks
Failure to qualify as a REIT would reduce our net earnings available for investment or distribution.
Our qualification as a REIT will depend upon our ability to meet requirements regarding our organization and ownership, distributions of our income, the nature and diversification of our income and assets and other tests imposed by the Internal Revenue Code. If we fail to qualify as a REIT for any taxable year after electing REIT status, we will be subject to federal income tax on our taxable income at corporate rates. In addition, we would generally be disqualified from treatment as a REIT for the four taxable years following the year in which we lost our REIT status. Losing our REIT status would reduce our net earnings available for investment or distribution to stockholders because of the additional tax liability. In addition, distributions to stockholders would no longer qualify for the dividends-paid deduction and we would no longer be required to pay distributions. If this occurs, we might be required to borrow funds or liquidate some investments in order to pay the applicable tax.
Failure to qualify as a REIT would subject us to U.S. federal income tax, which would reduce the cash available for distribution to our stockholders.
We believe that we have operated and will continue to operate in a manner that will allow us to continue to qualify as a REIT for federal income tax purposes, commencing with our initial taxable year ended December 31, 2011. However, the U.S. federal income tax laws governing REITs are extremely complex, and interpretations of the U.S. federal income tax laws governing qualification as a REIT are limited. Qualifying as a REIT requires us to meet various tests regarding the nature of our assets and our income, the ownership of our outstanding stock, and the amount of our distributions on an ongoing basis. Accordingly, we cannot be certain that we will be successful in operating so we can remain qualified as a REIT. While we intend to continue to operate so that we will qualify as a REIT, given the highly complex nature of the rules governing REITs, the ongoing importance of factual determinations, including the tax treatment of certain investments we may make, and the possibility of future changes in our circumstances, no assurance can be given that we will so qualify for any particular year. If we fail to qualify as a REIT in any calendar year and we do not qualify for certain statutory relief provisions, we would be required to pay U.S. federal income tax on our taxable income. We might need to borrow money or sell assets to pay that tax. Our payment of income tax would decrease the amount of our income available for distribution to our stockholders. Furthermore, if we fail to maintain our qualification as a REIT and we do not qualify for certain statutory relief provisions, we no longer would be required to distribute substantially all of our REIT taxable income to our stockholders. Unless our failure to qualify as a REIT were excused under federal tax laws, we would be disqualified from taxation as a REIT for the four taxable years following the year during which qualification was lost.
Our stockholders may have current tax liability on distributions they elect to reinvest in our common stock.
If our stockholders participate in our dividend reinvestment plan, they will be deemed to have received, and for income tax purposes will be taxed on, the amount reinvested in shares of our common stock to the extent the amount reinvested was not a tax-free return of capital. In addition, our stockholders will be treated for tax purposes as having received an additional distribution to the extent the shares are purchased at a discount to fair market value, if any. As a result, unless our stockholders are tax-exempt entities, they may have to use funds from other sources to pay their tax liability on the value of the shares of common stock received.
Even if we qualify as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes, we may be subject to federal, state, local or other tax liabilities that reduce our cash flow and our ability to pay distributions to our stockholders.
Even if we qualify as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes, we may be subject to some federal, state and local taxes on our income or property. For example:
•In order to qualify as a REIT, we must distribute annually at least 90% of our REIT taxable income to our stockholders (which is determined without regard to the dividends-paid deduction or net capital gain). To the extent that we satisfy the distribution requirement but distribute less than 100% of our REIT taxable income, we will be subject to federal corporate income tax on the undistributed income.
•We will be subject to a 4% nondeductible excise tax on the amount, if any, by which distributions we pay in any calendar year are less than the sum of 85% of our ordinary income, 95% of our capital gain net income and 100% of our undistributed income from prior years.
•If we elect to treat property that we acquire in connection with a foreclosure of a mortgage loan or certain leasehold terminations as “foreclosure property,” we may avoid the 100% tax on the gain from a resale of that property, but the income from the sale or operation of that property may be subject to corporate income tax at the highest applicable rate.
•If we sell an asset, other than foreclosure property, that we hold primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of business, our gain would be subject to the 100% “prohibited transaction” tax unless such sale were made by one of our taxable REIT subsidiaries or the sale met certain “safe harbor” requirements under the Internal Revenue Code.
REIT distribution requirements could adversely affect our ability to execute our business plan.
We generally must distribute annually at least 90% of our REIT taxable income, subject to certain adjustments and excluding any net capital gain, in order for federal corporate income tax not to apply to earnings that we distribute. To the extent that we satisfy this distribution requirement, but distribute less than 100% of our REIT taxable income, we will be subject to federal corporate income tax on our undistributed REIT taxable income. In addition, we will be subject to a 4% nondeductible excise tax if the actual amount that we pay out to our stockholders in a calendar year is less than a minimum amount specified under federal tax laws. We also may decide to retain net capital gain we earn from the sale or other disposition of our property and pay U.S. federal income tax directly on such income. In that event, our stockholders would be treated as if they earned that income and paid the tax on it directly. However, stockholders that are tax-exempt, such as charities or qualified pension plans, would have no benefit from their deemed payment of such tax liability unless they file U.S. federal income tax returns and thereon seek a refund of such tax. We also will be subject to corporate tax on any undistributed REIT taxable income. We intend to make distributions to our stockholders to comply with the REIT requirements of the Internal Revenue Code.
From time to time, we may generate taxable income greater than our income for financial reporting purposes, or our taxable income may be greater than our cash flow available for distribution to stockholders (for example, where a borrower defers the payment of interest in cash pursuant to a contractual right or otherwise). If we do not have other funds available in these situations we could be required to borrow funds, sell investments at disadvantageous prices or find another alternative source of funds to pay distributions sufficient to enable us to pay out enough of our taxable income to satisfy the REIT distribution requirements and to avoid corporate income tax and the 4% excise tax in a particular year. These alternatives could increase our costs or reduce our equity. Thus, compliance with the REIT requirements may hinder our ability to operate solely on the basis of maximizing profits.
To maintain our REIT status, we may be forced to forego otherwise attractive business or investment opportunities, which may delay or hinder our ability to meet our investment objectives and reduce our stockholders’ overall return.
To qualify as a REIT, we must satisfy certain tests on an ongoing basis concerning, among other things, the sources of our income, the nature and diversification of our assets, the ownership of our stock and the amounts we distribute to our stockholders. We may be required to pay distributions to stockholders at times when it would be more advantageous to reinvest cash in our business or when we do not have funds readily available for distribution. Compliance with the REIT requirements may hinder our ability to operate solely on the basis of maximizing profits and reduce the value of our stockholders’ investment.
If our operating partnership fails to maintain its status as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes, its income would be subject to taxation and our REIT status could be terminated.
We intend to maintain the status of our operating partnership as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes. However, if the Internal Revenue Service (“Internal Revenue Service” or “IRS”) were to successfully challenge the status of our operating partnership as a partnership, it would be taxable as a corporation. In such event, this would reduce the amount of distributions that our operating partnership could make to us. This could also result in our losing REIT status and becoming subject to a corporate level tax on our own income. This would substantially reduce our cash available to pay distributions and the return on your investment. In addition, if any of the entities through which our operating partnership owns its properties, in whole or in part, loses its characterization as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes, the underlying entity would become subject to taxation as a corporation, thereby reducing distributions to our operating partnership and jeopardizing our ability to maintain REIT status.
Potential characterization of distributions or gain on sale may be treated as unrelated business taxable income to tax-exempt investors.
If (i) all or a portion of our assets are subject to the rules relating to taxable mortgage pools, (ii) we are a “pension-held REIT,” or (iii) a tax-exempt stockholder has incurred debt to purchase or hold our common stock, then a portion of the distributions to and, in the case of a stockholder described in clause (iii), gains realized on the sale of common stock by such tax-exempt stockholder may be subject to U.S. federal income tax as unrelated business taxable income under the Internal Revenue Code.
The tax on prohibited transactions will limit our ability to engage in transactions that would be treated as sales for U.S. federal income tax purposes.
A REIT’s net income from prohibited transactions is subject to a 100% tax. In general, prohibited transactions are sales or other dispositions of assets, other than foreclosure property, deemed held primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of business. Whether property is held primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of a trade or business depends on the specific facts and circumstances. No assurance can be given that any particular property (including loans) in which we hold a direct or indirect interest will not be treated as property held for sale to customers.
Complying with REIT requirements may force us to liquidate otherwise attractive investments.
To qualify as a REIT, we must ensure that at the end of each calendar quarter, at least 75% of the value of our assets consists of cash, cash items, government securities and qualified REIT real estate assets. The remainder of our investment in securities (other than government securities and qualified real estate assets) generally cannot include more than 10% of the outstanding voting securities of any one issuer or more than 10% of the total value of the outstanding securities of any one issuer. In addition, in general, no more than 5% of the value of our assets (other than government securities and qualified real estate assets) can consist of the securities of any one issuer, no more than 20% of the value of our total assets can be represented by securities of one or more taxable REIT subsidiaries and no more than 25% of the value of our total assets can be represented by “non-qualified publicly offered REIT debt instruments.” If we fail to comply with these requirements at the end of any calendar quarter, we must correct the failure within 30 days after the end of the calendar quarter or qualify for certain statutory relief provisions to avoid losing our REIT qualification and suffering adverse tax consequences. As a result, we may be required to liquidate from our portfolio otherwise attractive investments. These actions could have the effect of reducing our income and amounts available for distribution to our stockholders.
Liquidation of assets may jeopardize our REIT qualification.
To qualify as a REIT, we must comply with requirements regarding our assets and our sources of income. If we are compelled to liquidate our investments to repay obligations to our lenders, we may be unable to comply with these requirements, ultimately jeopardizing our qualification as a REIT, or we may be subject to a 100% tax on any resultant gain if we sell assets that are treated as dealer property or inventory.
Complying with REIT requirements may limit our ability to hedge effectively.
The REIT provisions of the Internal Revenue Code may limit our ability to hedge our assets and operations. Under these provisions, any income that we generate from transactions intended to hedge our interest rate, inflation and/or currency risks will be excluded from gross income for purposes of the REIT 75% and 95% gross income tests if the purpose of the instrument is to (i) hedge interest rate risk on liabilities incurred to carry or acquire real estate, (ii) hedge risk of currency fluctuations with respect to any item of income or gain that would be qualifying income under the REIT 75% or 95% gross income tests, or (iii) manage risk with respect to the termination of certain prior hedging transactions described in (i) and/or (ii) above and, in each case, such instrument is properly and timely identified under applicable Department of the Treasury regulations (“Treasury Regulations”). Income from hedging transactions that do not meet these requirements will generally constitute nonqualifying income for purposes of both the REIT 75% and 95% gross income tests. As a result of these rules, we may have to limit our use of hedging techniques that might otherwise be advantageous, which could result in greater risks associated with interest rate or other changes than we would otherwise incur.
Our ownership of and relationship with our taxable REIT subsidiaries will be limited and a failure to comply with the limits would jeopardize our REIT status and may result in the application of a 100% excise tax.
A REIT may own up to 100% of the stock of one or more taxable REIT subsidiaries. A taxable REIT subsidiary may earn income that would not be qualifying income if earned directly by the parent REIT. Both the subsidiary and the REIT must jointly elect to treat the subsidiary as a taxable REIT subsidiary. A corporation of which a taxable REIT subsidiary directly or indirectly owns more than 35% of the voting power or value of the stock will automatically be treated as a taxable REIT subsidiary. Overall, no more than 20% of the value of a REIT’s assets may consist of stock or securities of one or more taxable REIT subsidiaries. A domestic taxable REIT subsidiary will pay federal, state and local income tax at regular corporate rates on any income that it earns. In addition, the taxable REIT subsidiary rules limit the deductibility of interest paid or accrued by a taxable REIT subsidiary to its parent REIT to assure that the taxable REIT subsidiary is subject to an appropriate level of corporate taxation. The rules also impose a 100% excise tax on certain transactions between a taxable REIT subsidiary and its parent REIT that are not conducted on an arm’s-length basis. We cannot assure our stockholders that we will be able to comply with the 20% value limitation on ownership of taxable REIT subsidiary stock and securities on an ongoing basis so as to maintain REIT status or to avoid application of the 100% excise tax imposed on certain non-arm’s length transactions.
The ability of our board of directors to revoke our REIT qualification without stockholder approval may subject us to U.S. federal income tax and reduce distributions to our stockholders.
Our charter authorizes our board of directors to revoke or otherwise terminate our REIT election, without the approval of our stockholders, if it determines that it is no longer in our best interest to continue to qualify as a REIT. While we believe we have qualified and intend to continue to qualify to be taxed as a REIT, we may terminate our REIT election if we determine that qualifying as a REIT is no longer in our best interests. If we cease to be a REIT, we would become subject to U.S. federal income tax on our taxable income and would no longer be required to distribute most of our taxable income to our stockholders, which may have adverse consequences on our total return to our stockholders and on the market price of our common stock.
Generally, ordinary dividends payable by REITs do not qualify for the reduced tax rates.
In general, the maximum tax rate for qualified dividends payable to domestic stockholders that are individuals, trusts and estates is 20%. Ordinary dividends payable by REITs, however, are generally not eligible for this reduced rate. While this tax treatment does not adversely affect the taxation of REITs or dividends paid by REITs, the more favorable rates applicable to regular corporate dividends could cause investors who are individuals, trusts or estates to perceive investments in REITs to be relatively less attractive than investments in stock of non-REIT corporations that pay dividends, which could adversely affect the value of the stock of REITs, including our common stock. However, under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, Pub. L. No. 115-97, commencing with taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2018 and continuing through 2025, individual taxpayers may be entitled to claim a deduction in determining their taxable income of 20% of ordinary REIT dividends (dividends other than capital gain dividends and dividends attributable to certain qualified dividend income received by us), which temporarily reduces the effective tax rate on such dividends. The deduction, if allowed in full, equates to a maximum effective U.S. federal income tax rate on ordinary REIT dividends of 29.6%. Without further legislation, this deduction would sunset after 2025. Our stockholders are urged to consult with their tax advisor regarding the effect of this change on their effective tax rate with respect to REIT dividends.
Qualifying as a REIT involves highly technical and complex provisions of the Internal Revenue Code.
Qualification as a REIT involves the application of highly technical and complex Internal Revenue Code provisions for which only limited judicial and administrative authorities exist. Even a technical or inadvertent violation could jeopardize our REIT qualification. Our continued qualification as a REIT will depend on our satisfaction of certain asset, income, organizational, distribution, stockholder ownership and other requirements on a continuing basis. In addition, our ability to satisfy the requirements to qualify as a REIT depends in part on the actions of third parties over which we have no control or only limited influence, including in cases where we own an equity interest in an entity that is classified as a partnership or REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes.
The taxation of distributions to our stockholders can be complex; however, distributions that we make to our stockholders generally will be taxable as ordinary income, which may reduce your anticipated return from an investment in us.
Distributions that we make to our taxable stockholders to the extent of our current and accumulated earnings and profits (and not designated as capital gain dividends or qualified dividend income) generally will be taxable as ordinary income. However, a portion of our distributions may (i) be designated by us as capital gain dividends generally taxable as long-term capital gain to the extent that they are attributable to net capital gain recognized by us, (ii) be designated by us as qualified dividend income generally to the extent they are attributable to dividends we receive from non-REIT corporations, such as our taxable REIT subsidiaries, or (iii) constitute a return of capital generally to the extent that they exceed our current and accumulated earnings and profits as determined for U.S. federal income tax purposes. A return of capital distribution is not taxable, but has the effect of reducing the basis of a stockholder’s investment in our common stock.
We may be required to pay some taxes due to actions of a taxable REIT subsidiary which would reduce our cash available for distribution to you.
Any net taxable income earned directly by a taxable REIT subsidiary, or through entities that are disregarded for U.S. federal income tax purposes as entities separate from our taxable REIT subsidiaries, will be subject to federal and possibly state corporate income tax. In this regard, several provisions of the laws applicable to REITs and their subsidiaries ensure that a taxable REIT subsidiary will be subject to an appropriate level of U.S. federal income taxation. For example, a taxable REIT subsidiary may be limited in its ability to deduct certain interest payments made to an affiliated REIT. In addition, the REIT has to pay a 100% penalty tax on some payments that it receives or on some deductions taken by or payments made to a taxable REIT subsidiary if the economic arrangements between the REIT, the REIT’s customers, and the taxable REIT subsidiary are not comparable to similar arrangements between unrelated parties. Finally, some state and local jurisdictions may tax some of our income even though as a REIT we are not subject to U.S. federal income tax on that income because not all states and localities follow the U.S. federal income tax treatment of REITs. To the extent that we and our affiliates are required to pay federal, state and local taxes, we will have less cash available for distributions to our stockholders.
We may distribute our common stock in a taxable distribution, in which case you may sell shares of our common stock to pay tax on such distributions, and you may receive less in cash than the amount of the dividend that is taxable.
We may make taxable distributions that are payable in cash and common stock. Under IRS Revenue Procedure 2017-45, as a publicly offered REIT, we may give stockholders a choice, subject to various limits and requirements, of receiving a dividend in cash or in common stock of the REIT. As long as at least 20% (modified pursuant to Revenue Procedure 2021-53 to 10% for distributions declared on or after November 1, 2021 and on or before June 30, 2022) of the total dividend is available in cash and certain other requirements are satisfied, the IRS will treat the stock distribution as a dividend (to the extent applicable rules treat such distribution as being made out of the REIT’s earnings and profits). Taxable stockholders receiving stock will be required to include in income, as a dividend, the full value of such stock, to the extent of our current and accumulated earnings and profits for federal income tax purposes. As a result, a U.S. stockholder may be required to pay income taxes with respect to such dividends in excess of the cash dividends received. If a U.S. stockholder sells the stock it receives as a dividend to pay this tax, the sales proceeds may be less than the amount included in income with respect to the dividend, depending on the market price of our stock at the time of the sale. Furthermore, with respect to non-U.S. stockholders, we may be required to withhold U.S. tax with respect to such dividends, including in respect of all or a portion of such dividend that is payable in stock.
Investments in other REITs and real estate partnerships could subject us to the tax risks associated with the tax status of such entities.
We may invest in the securities of other REITs and real estate partnerships. Such investments are subject to the risk that any such REIT or partnership may fail to satisfy the requirements to qualify as a REIT or a partnership, as the case may be, in any given taxable year. In the case of a REIT, such failure would subject such entity to taxation as a corporation, may require such REIT to incur indebtedness to pay its tax liabilities, may reduce its ability to make distributions to us, and may render it ineligible to elect REIT status prior to the fifth taxable year following the year in which it fails to so qualify. In the case of a partnership, such failure could subject such partnership to an entity level tax and reduce the entity’s ability to make distributions to us. In addition, such failures could, depending on the circumstances, jeopardize our ability to qualify as a REIT because we may then own more than 10% of the securities of an issuer that was neither a REIT, a qualified REIT subsidiary nor a taxable REIT subsidiary.
Non-U.S. stockholders will be subject to U.S. federal withholding tax and may be subject to U.S. federal income tax on distributions received from us and upon the disposition of our shares.
Subject to certain exceptions, distributions received from us will be treated as dividends of ordinary income to the extent of our current or accumulated earnings and profits. Such dividends ordinarily will be subject to U.S. withholding tax at a 30% rate, or such lower rate as may be specified by an applicable income tax treaty, unless the distributions are treated as “effectively connected” with the conduct by the non-U.S. stockholder of a U.S. trade or business. Pursuant to the Foreign Investment in Real Property Tax Act of 1980, or FIRPTA, capital gain distributions attributable to sales or exchanges of “U.S. real property interests,” or USRPIs, generally (subject to certain exceptions for “qualified foreign pension funds,” entities all the interests of which are held by “qualified foreign pension funds” and certain “qualified shareholders”) will be taxed to a non-U.S. stockholder as if such gain were effectively connected with a U.S. trade or business unless FIRPTA provides an exemption. However, a capital gain dividend will not be treated as effectively connected income if (i) the distribution is received with respect to a class of stock that is regularly traded on an established securities market located in the United States and (ii) the non-U.S. stockholder does not own more than 10% of the class of our stock at any time during the one-year period ending on the date the distribution is received. We do not anticipate that our shares will be “regularly traded” on an established securities market for the foreseeable future, and therefore, this exception is not expected to apply.
Gain recognized by a non-U.S. stockholder upon the sale or exchange of our common stock generally will not be subject to U.S. federal income taxation unless such stock constitutes a USRPI under FIRPTA (subject to specific FIRPTA exemptions for certain non-U.S. stockholders). Our common stock will not constitute a USRPI so long as we are a “domestically-controlled qualified investment entity.” A domestically-controlled qualified investment entity includes a REIT if at all times during a specified testing period, less than 50% in value of such REIT’s stock is held directly or indirectly by non-U.S. stockholders. No assurance can be given, however, that we are or will be a domestically-controlled REIT.
Even if we do not qualify as a domestically-controlled qualified investment entity at the time a non-U.S. stockholder sells or exchanges our common stock, gain arising from such a sale or exchange would not be subject to U.S. taxation under FIRPTA as a sale of a USRPI if: (a) our common stock is “regularly traded,” as defined by applicable Treasury Regulations, on an established securities market, and (b) such non-U.S. stockholder owned, actually and constructively, 10% or less of our common stock at any time during the five-year period ending on the date of the sale. However, it is not anticipated that our common stock will be “regularly traded” on an established market. We encourage our stockholders to consult their tax advisor to determine the tax consequences applicable to our stockholders if they are a non-U.S. stockholder.
We may be subject to adverse legislative or regulatory tax changes that could increase our tax liability, reduce our operating flexibility and reduce the price of our common stock.
At any time, the U.S. federal income tax laws or regulations governing REITs or the administrative interpretations of those laws or regulations may be amended. We cannot predict when or if any new U.S. federal income tax law, regulation or administrative interpretation, or any amendment to any existing U.S. federal income tax law, regulation or administrative interpretation, will be adopted, promulgated or become effective and any such law, regulation or interpretation may take effect retroactively. We and our stockholders could be adversely affected by any such change in, or any new, U.S. federal income tax law, regulation or administrative interpretation. Our stockholders are urged to consult with their tax advisor with respect to the impact of the recent legislation on their investment in our shares and the status of legislative, regulatory or administrative developments and proposals and their potential effect on an investment in our shares. Although REITs generally receive certain tax advantages compared to entities taxed as regular corporations, it is possible that future legislation would result in a REIT having fewer tax advantages, and it could become more advantageous for a company that invests in real estate to elect to be treated for U.S. federal income tax purposes as a corporation. As a result, our charter authorizes our board of directors to revoke or otherwise terminate our REIT election, without the approval of our stockholders, if it determines that it is no longer in our best interests to qualify as a REIT. The impact of tax reform on an investment in our shares is uncertain. Prospective investors should consult their own tax advisors regarding changes in tax laws.
The failure of a mezzanine loan to qualify as a real estate asset could adversely affect our ability to qualify as a REIT.
We may acquire mezzanine loans, for which the IRS has provided a safe harbor but not rules of substantive law. Pursuant to the safe harbor, if a mezzanine loan meets certain requirements, it will be treated by the IRS as a real estate asset for purposes of the REIT asset tests, and interest derived from the mezzanine loan will be treated as qualifying mortgage interest for purposes of the REIT 75% income test. Although we intend to invest in mezzanine loans in a manner that will enable us to satisfy the gross income tests and asset tests, we may acquire mezzanine loans that do not meet all of the requirements of this safe harbor. In the event we own a mezzanine loan that does not meet the safe harbor, the IRS could challenge such loan’s treatment as a real estate asset for purposes of the REIT asset and income tests and, if such a challenge were sustained, we could fail to qualify as a REIT.
Retirement Plan Risks
If the fiduciary of an employee benefit plan subject to ERISA (such as a profit sharing, Section 401(k) or pension plan) or an owner of a retirement arrangement subject to Section 4975 of the Internal Revenue Code (such as an individual retirement account (“IRA”)) fails to meet the fiduciary and other standards under ERISA or the Internal Revenue Code as a result of an investment in our stock, the fiduciary could be subject to penalties and other sanctions.
There are special considerations that apply to employee benefit plans subject to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”) (such as profit sharing, Section 401(k) or pension plans) and other retirement plans or accounts subject to Section 4975 of the Internal Revenue Code (such as an IRA) or any entity whose assets include such assets (each a “Benefit Plan”) that are investing or have invested in our shares. Fiduciaries, IRA owners and other benefit plan investors investing or that have invested the assets of such a plan or account in our common stock should satisfy themselves that:
•the investment is consistent with their fiduciary and other obligations under ERISA and the Internal Revenue Code;
•the investment is made in accordance with the documents and instruments governing the plan or IRA, including the plan’s or account’s investment policy;
•the investment satisfies the prudence and diversification requirements of Sections 404(a)(1)(B) and 404(a)(1)(C) of ERISA and other applicable provisions of ERISA and the Internal Revenue Code;
•the investment in our shares, for which no trading market currently exists, is consistent with the liquidity needs of the plan or IRA;
•the investment will not produce an unacceptable amount of “unrelated business taxable income” for the plan or IRA;
•our stockholders will be able to comply with the requirements under ERISA and the Internal Revenue Code to value the assets of the plan or IRA annually; and
•the investment will not constitute a non-exempt prohibited transaction under Section 406 of ERISA or Section 4975 of the Internal Revenue Code.
With respect to the annual valuation requirements described above, we will provide an estimated value per share for our common stock annually to those fiduciaries (including IRA trustees and custodians) who request it. We can make no claim whether such estimated value per share will or will not satisfy the applicable annual valuation requirements under ERISA and the Internal Revenue Code. The Department of Labor or the Internal Revenue Service may determine that a plan fiduciary or a fiduciary acting for an IRA is required to take further steps to determine the value of our common stock. In the absence of an appropriate determination of value, a plan fiduciary or a fiduciary acting for an IRA may be subject to damages, penalties or other sanctions. For information regarding our estimated value per share, see Part II, Item 5, “Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities - Market Information” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Failure to satisfy the fiduciary standards of conduct and other applicable requirements of ERISA and the Internal Revenue Code may result in the imposition of civil and criminal penalties, and can subject the fiduciary to claims for damages or for equitable remedies, including liability for investment losses. In addition, if an investment in our shares constitutes a non-exempt prohibited transaction under ERISA or the Internal Revenue Code, the fiduciary or IRA owner who authorized or directed the investment may be subject to the imposition of excise taxes with respect to the amount invested. Additionally, the investment transaction may have to be undone. In the case of a prohibited transaction involving an IRA owner, the IRA may be disqualified as a tax-exempt account and all of the assets of the IRA may be deemed distributed and subjected to tax. ERISA plan fiduciaries and IRA owners should consult with counsel before making an investment in our shares.
If our assets are deemed to be plan assets, our advisor and we may be exposed to liabilities under Title I of ERISA and the Internal Revenue Code.
In some circumstances where an ERISA plan holds an interest in an entity, the assets of the entity are deemed to be ERISA plan assets unless an exception applies. This is known as the “look-through rule.” Under those circumstances, the obligations and other responsibilities of plan sponsors, plan fiduciaries and plan administrators, and of parties in interest and disqualified persons, under Title I of ERISA and Section 4975 of the Internal Revenue Code, as applicable, may be applicable, and there may be liability under these and other provisions of ERISA and the Internal Revenue Code. We believe that our assets should not be treated as plan assets because the shares should qualify as “publicly-offered securities” that are exempt from the look-through rules under applicable Treasury Regulations. We note, however, that because certain limitations are imposed upon the transferability of shares so that we may qualify as a REIT, and perhaps for other reasons, it is possible that this exemption may not apply. If that is the case, and if KBS Capital Advisors or we are exposed to liability under ERISA or the Internal Revenue Code, our performance and results of operations could be adversely affected. Stockholders should consult with their legal and other advisors concerning the impact of ERISA and the Internal Revenue Code on their investment and our performance.
We do not intend to provide investment advice to any potential investor for a fee. However, we, our advisor and our respective affiliates receive certain fees and other consideration disclosed herein in connection with an investment. If it were determined we provided a Benefit Plan investor with investment advice for a fee, it could give rise to a determination that we constitute an investment advice fiduciary under ERISA. Such a determination could give rise to claims that our fee arrangements constitute non-exempt prohibited transactions under ERISA or the Internal Revenue Code and/or claims that we have breached a fiduciary duty to a Benefit Plan investor. Adverse determinations with respect to ERISA fiduciary status or non-exempt prohibited transactions could result in significant civil penalties and excise taxes.

---

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
We have no unresolved staff comments.

---

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
As of December 31, 2021, our real estate portfolio was composed of 16 office properties and one mixed-use office/retail property encompassing 7.3 million rentable square feet in the aggregate that were collectively 85% occupied with a weighted-average remaining lease term of 5.3 years. The following table provides summary information regarding the properties owned by us as of December 31, 2021:
Property
Location of Property
Date Acquired Property Type Rentable Square Feet Total Real Estate at Cost (1) (in thousands)
Annualized Base Rent (2) (in thousands)
Average Annualized Base Rent per Square Foot (3)
Average Remaining Lease Term in Years % of Total Assets Occupancy
Town Center
Plano, TX
03/27/2012 Office 522,043 $ 133,177 $ 12,861 $ 28.07 3.5 4.0 % 87.8 %
McEwen Building
Franklin, TN
04/30/2012 Office 175,262 37,749 3,527 28.63 5.0 1.3 % 70.3 %
Gateway Tech Center
Salt Lake City, UT
05/09/2012 Office 210,938 31,587 5,230 27.73 4.7 1.0 % 89.4 %
RBC Plaza
Minneapolis, MN
01/31/2013 Office 710,332 144,859 13,493 19.93 6.9 4.3 % 95.3 %
Preston Commons
Dallas, TX
06/19/2013 Office 427,799 138,743 10,050 26.79 4.4 4.7 % 87.7 %
Sterling Plaza
Dallas, TX
06/19/2013 Office 313,609 87,795 6,611 26.74 4.0 2.8 % 78.8 %
201 Spear Street
San Francisco, CA
12/03/2013 Office 252,591 151,309 18,248 76.48 3.9 5.3 % 94.5 %
Accenture Tower
Chicago, IL
12/16/2013 Office 1,457,724 489,253 27,481 26.67 8.0 16.4 % 70.7 %
Ten Almaden
San Jose, CA
12/05/2014 Office 309,255 130,588 13,812 49.12 2.8 4.4 % 90.9 %
Towers at Emeryville
Emeryville, CA
12/23/2014 Office 593,484 214,249 24,014 51.31 3.0 7.4 % 78.9 %
3003 Washington Boulevard
Arlington, VA
12/30/2014 Office 211,054 152,239 12,456 60.83 8.8 5.2 % 97.0 %
Park Place Village
Leawood, KS
06/18/2015 Office/Retail 484,980 80,986 13,750 30.53 6.5 3.3 % 92.9 %
201 17th Street
Atlanta, GA
06/23/2015 Office 355,870 103,842 10,010 31.12 5.2 3.4 % 90.4 %
515 Congress
Austin, TX
08/31/2015 Office 267,956 130,185 7,910 35.38 2.7 4.7 % 83.4 %
The Almaden
San Jose, CA
09/23/2015 Office 416,126 189,307 20,017 51.16 4.6 6.8 % 94.0 %
3001 Washington Boulevard
Arlington, VA
11/06/2015 Office 94,836 60,867 5,349 57.23 7.7 2.2 % 98.5 %
Carillon
Charlotte, NC
01/15/2016 Office 488,277 164,531 11,259 28.21 2.8 5.8 % 81.7 %
7,292,136 $ 2,441,266 $ 216,078 $ 35.01 5.3 84.6 %
_____________________
(1) Total real estate at cost represents the total cost of real estate net of impairment charges and write-offs of fully depreciated/amortized assets.
(2) Annualized base rent represents annualized contractual base rental income as of December 31, 2021, adjusted to straight-line any contractual tenant concessions (including free rent), rent increases and rent decreases from the lease’s inception through the balance of the lease term.
(3) Average annualized base rent per square foot is calculated as the annualized base rent divided by the leased square feet.
Portfolio Lease Expirations
The following table sets forth a schedule of expiring leases for our real estate portfolio by square footage and by annualized base rent as of December 31, 2021:
Year of Expiration Number of Leases
Expiring Annualized Base Rent Expiring (1)
(in thousands)
% of Portfolio Annualized Base Rent Expiring Leased Square Feet Expiring
% of Portfolio Leased Square Feet Expiring
Month to Month 34 $ 3,233 1.5 % 172,312 2.8 %
2022 122 38,979 18.0 % 1,234,202 20.0 %
2023 86 25,052 11.6 % 681,213 11.0 %
2024 89 20,094 9.3 % 573,601 9.3 %
2025 63 17,343 8.0 % 465,208 7.5 %
2026 60 22,266 10.3 % 604,946 9.8 %
2027 53 18,337 8.5 % 601,108 9.7 %
2028 24 11,242 5.2 % 338,442 5.5 %
2029 19 14,077 6.5 % 317,311 5.1 %
2030 16 19,560 9.1 % 473,107 7.7 %
2031 10 3,189 1.5 % 136,981 2.2 %
Thereafter 12 22,706 10.5 % 573,110 9.4 %
Total 588 $ 216,078 100.0 % 6,171,541 100.0 %
_____________________
(1) Annualized base rent represents annualized contractual base rental income as of December 31, 2021, adjusted to straight-line any contractual tenant concessions (including free rent), rent increases and rent decreases from the lease’s inception through the balance of the lease term.
As of December 31, 2021, our portfolio’s highest tenant industry concentrations (greater than 10% of annualized base rent) were as follows:
Industry Number of Tenants Annualized Base Rent (1)
(in thousands)
Percentage of Annualized Base Rent
Finance 112 $ 46,214 21.4 %
Real Estate 57 22,890 10.6 %
$ 69,104 32.0 %
_____________________
(1) Annualized base rent represents annualized contractual base rental income as of December 31, 2021, adjusted to straight-line any contractual tenant concessions (including free rent), rent increases and rent decreases from the lease’s inception through the balance of the lease term.
As of December 31, 2021, no other tenant industries accounted for more than 10% of annualized base rent and no tenant accounted for more than 10% of the annualized base rent.
For more information about our real estate portfolio, see Part I, Item 1, “Business.”

---

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
From time to time, we are party to legal proceedings that arise in the ordinary course of our business. Management is not aware of any legal proceedings of which the outcome is reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or financial condition, nor are we aware of any such legal proceedings contemplated by government authorities.

---

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURE
ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
Not applicable.
PART II

---

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND
ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
Stockholder Information
As of March 28, 2022, we had 151.4 million shares of common stock outstanding held by a total of approximately 31,000 stockholders. The number of stockholders is based on the records of DST Systems, Inc., which serves as our transfer agent.
Market Information
There is no public trading market for the shares of our common stock and we do not anticipate that there will be a public trading market for our shares. We currently have no plans to list our shares on a national securities exchange. Until our shares are listed, if ever, our stockholders may not sell their shares unless the buyer meets the applicable suitability and minimum purchase requirements. Any sale must comply with applicable state and federal securities laws. In addition, our charter prohibits the ownership of more than 9.8% of our stock by a single person, unless exempted by our board of directors. Consequently, there is the risk that our stockholders may not be able to sell their shares at a time or price acceptable to them.
We provide an estimated value per share to assist broker-dealers that participated in our now-terminated initial public offering in meeting their customer account statement reporting obligations under FINRA Rule 2231. This valuation was performed in accordance with the provisions of and also to comply with the IPA Valuation Guidelines. For this purpose, we estimated the value of the shares of our common stock as $10.78 per share as of December 31, 2021. This estimated value per share is based on our board of directors’ approval on November 1, 2021 of an estimated value per share of our common stock of $10.78 based on the estimated value of our assets less the estimated value of our liabilities, or net asset value, divided by the number of shares outstanding, all as of September 30, 2021, with the exception of adjustments to our net asset value to give effect to (i) the change in the estimated value of our investment in units of the SREIT (SGX-ST Ticker: OXMU) as of October 22, 2021 and (ii) the contractual sales price less estimated disposition costs and fees of one property that was under contract to sell as of November 1, 2021. Other than these adjustments, there were no material changes between September 30, 2021 and November 1, 2021 to the net values of our assets and liabilities that impacted the overall estimated value per share.
The conflicts committee, composed solely of all of our independent directors, is responsible for the oversight of the valuation process used to determine the estimated value per share of our common stock, including the review and approval of the valuation and appraisal processes and methodologies used to determine our estimated value per share, the consistency of the valuation and appraisal methodologies with real estate industry standards and practices and the reasonableness of the assumptions used in the valuations and appraisals. With the approval of the conflicts committee, we engaged Kroll, LLC (formerly Duff & Phelps, LLC) (“Kroll”), an independent third party real estate valuation firm, to provide (i) appraisals for 17 of our consolidated real estate properties owned as of September 30, 2021 (the “Appraised Properties”), (ii) an estimated value for our investment in units of the SREIT (described below) and (iii) a calculation of the range in estimated value per share of our common stock as of November 1, 2021. Kroll based this range in estimated value per share upon (i) its appraisals of the Appraised Properties, (ii) the contractual sales price less estimated disposition costs and fees of one property that was under contract to sell as of November 1, 2021, (iii) its estimated value for our investment in units of the SREIT and (iv) valuations performed by our advisor of our cash, other assets, notes payable and other liabilities, which are disclosed in our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2021. The appraisal reports Kroll prepared summarized the key inputs and assumptions involved in the appraisal of each of the Appraised Properties. The methodologies and assumptions used to determine the estimated value of our assets and the estimated value of our liabilities are described further below.
The conflicts committee reviewed Kroll’s valuation report, which included an appraised value for each of the Appraised Properties, the contractual sales price less estimated disposition costs and fees of one property that was under contract to sell as of November 1, 2021, an estimated value of our investment in units of the SREIT and a summary of the estimated value of each of our other assets and our liabilities as determined by our advisor and reviewed by Kroll. In light of the valuation report and other factors considered by the conflicts committee and the conflicts committee’s own extensive knowledge of our assets and liabilities, the conflicts committee: (i) concluded that the range in estimated value per share of $9.94 to $11.61, with an approximate mid-range value of $10.78 per share, as determined by Kroll and recommended by our advisor, which approximate mid-range value was based on Kroll’s appraisals of the Appraised Properties, the contractual sales price less estimated disposition costs and fees of one property that was under contract to sell as of November 1, 2021, Kroll’s valuation of our investment in units of the SREIT and valuations performed by our advisor of our cash, other assets, notes payable and other liabilities, was reasonable and (ii) recommended to our board of directors that it adopt $10.78 as the estimated value per share of our common stock, which estimated value per share is based on those factors discussed in (i) above. Our board of directors unanimously agreed to accept the recommendation of the conflicts committee and approved $10.78 as the estimated value per share of our common stock, which determination is ultimately and solely the responsibility of the board of directors.
The table below sets forth the calculation of our estimated value per share as of November 1, 2021 as well as the calculation of our prior estimated value per share as of May 13, 2021. Kroll was not responsible for the determination of the estimated value per share as of November 1, 2021 or May 13, 2021, respectively.
November 1, 2021
Estimated Value
per Share May 13, 2021
Estimated Value
per Share (1)
Change in
Estimated Value
per Share
Real estate properties (2)
$ 19.74 $ 16.62 $ 3.12
Cash, restricted cash and cash equivalents (3)
0.25 0.82 (0.57)
Investment in SREIT units (4)
1.45 1.21 0.24
Other assets 0.10 0.09 0.01
Notes payable (5)
(10.17) (7.48) (2.69)
Other liabilities (0.59) (0.49) (0.10)
Estimated value per share $ 10.78 $ 10.77 $ 0.01
Estimated enterprise value premium None assumed None assumed None assumed
Total estimated value per share $ 10.78 $ 10.77 $ 0.01
_____________________
(1) The May 13, 2021 estimated value per share was based upon a calculation of the range in estimated value per share of our common stock as of May 13, 2021 by Kroll and the recommendation of our advisor. Kroll based this range in estimated value per share upon (i) its appraisals for 18 of our consolidated real estate properties owned as of March 31, 2021, (ii) its estimated value for our investment in units of the SREIT and (iii) valuations performed by our advisor of our cash, other assets, notes payable and other liabilities. For more information relating to the May 13, 2021 estimated value per share and the assumptions and methodologies used by Kroll and our advisor, see our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on May 14, 2021.
(2) The increase in the estimated value of real estate properties per share is primarily due to an overall decrease in our outstanding shares of common stock as a result of the Self-Tender (defined in note 3 below) and shares repurchased in our share redemption program. In addition, the estimated value of real estate properties per share increased due to an increase in appraised values of the Appraised Properties and an increase in value for one property that was under contract to sell as of November 1, 2021 compared to its March 31, 2021 appraised value. The estimated value of our 18 real estate properties as of September 30, 2021 was $3.1 billion.
(3) The decrease in the estimated value of cash, restricted cash and cash equivalents per share is primarily due to an overall decrease in our outstanding shares of common stock as a result of the Self-Tender (defined below) and shares repurchased in our share redemption program. In order to provide stockholders with additional liquidity that is in excess of that permitted under its share redemption program, on June 4, 2021, we commenced a self-tender offer (the “Self-Tender”) for up to 33,849,130 shares of common stock at a price of $10.34 per share, or approximately $350.0 million of shares. On July 12, 2021, we accepted for purchase 26,375,383 shares properly tendered and not properly withdrawn at a purchase price of $10.34 per share, or approximately $272.7 million of shares, excluding fees and expenses relating to the tender offer. We funded the purchase of shares in the offer with approximately $100.0 million of available cash on hand and by drawing on our existing credit facilities in an aggregate amount of approximately $172.7 million. As a result of the Self-Tender, the estimated value of our assets and liabilities per share would generally increase due to fewer shares being outstanding.
(4) The increase in the estimated value of our investment in SREIT units per share is primarily due to an overall decrease in our outstanding shares of common stock as a result of the Self-Tender and shares repurchased in our share redemption program.
(5) The increase in the estimated value of notes payable per share is primarily due to an overall decrease in our outstanding shares of common stock as a result of the Self-Tender and shares repurchased in our share redemption program. In addition, the estimated value of notes payable per share increased due to additional borrowings on our existing credit facilities, which was used to partially fund the Self-Tender. See note 3 above.
The increase in our estimated value per share from the previous estimate was primarily due to the items noted in the table below, which reflect the significant contributors to the increase in the estimated value per share from $10.77 to $10.78. The changes are not equal to the change in values of each asset and liability group presented in the table above due to changes in the amount of shares outstanding, debt financings and other factors, which caused the value of certain asset or liability groups to change with no impact to our fair value of equity or the overall estimated value per share.
Change in Estimated Value per Share
May 13, 2021 estimated value per share $ 10.77
Changes to estimated value per share
Investments
Real estate 0.17
Investment in SREIT units 0.03
Capital expenditures on real estate (0.24)
Total change related to investments (0.04)
Notes payable (0.07)
Interest rate swap liability 0.05
Other changes, net (1)
0.07
Total change in estimated value per share $ 0.01
November 1, 2021 estimated value per share $ 10.78
_____________________
(1) Other changes, net is primarily due to the impact of shares repurchased under the Self-Tender and in our share redemption program.
As with any valuation methodology, the methodologies used are based upon a number of estimates and assumptions that may not be accurate or complete. Different parties using different assumptions and estimates could derive a different estimated value per share of our common stock, and this difference could be significant. The estimated value per share is not audited and does not represent the fair value of our assets less the fair value of our liabilities according to U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”), nor does it represent a liquidation value of our assets and liabilities or the price at which our shares of common stock would trade on a national securities exchange. The estimated value per share does not reflect a discount for the fact that we are externally managed, nor does it reflect a real estate portfolio premium/discount versus the sum of the individual property values. The estimated value per share also does not take into account estimated disposition costs and fees for real estate properties that were not under contract to sell as of November 1, 2021, debt prepayment penalties that could apply upon the prepayment of certain of our debt obligations, the impact of restrictions on the assumption of debt or swap breakage fees that may be incurred upon the termination of certain of our swaps prior to expiration. We have generally incurred disposition costs and fees related to the sale of each real estate property since inception of 0.8% to 2.9% of the gross sales price less concessions and credits, with the weighted average being approximately 1.4%. The estimated value per share also does not take into consideration acquisition-related costs and financing costs related to any future acquisitions subsequent to November 1, 2021. As of November 1, 2021, we had no potentially dilutive securities outstanding that would impact the estimated value per share of our common stock.
Our estimated value per share takes into consideration any potential liability related to a subordinated participation in cash flows our advisor is entitled to upon meeting certain stockholder return thresholds in accordance with the advisory agreement. For purposes of determining the estimated value per share, our advisor calculated the potential liability related to this incentive fee based on a hypothetical liquidation of the assets and liabilities at their estimated fair values, after considering the impact of any potential closing costs and fees related to the disposition of real estate properties, and determined that there would be no liability related to the subordinated participation in cash flows at that time.
Methodology
Our goal for the valuation was to arrive at a reasonable and supportable estimated value per share, using a process that was designed to be in compliance with the IPA Valuation Guidelines and using what we and our advisor deemed to be appropriate valuation methodologies and assumptions. The following is a summary of the valuation and appraisal methodologies, assumptions and estimates used to value our assets and liabilities:
Independent Valuation Firm
Kroll(1) was selected by our advisor and approved by our conflicts committee and board of directors to appraise each of the Appraised Properties, to provide an estimated value of our investment in units of the SREIT and to provide a calculation of the range in estimated value per share of our common stock as of November 1, 2021. Kroll is engaged in the business of appraising commercial real estate properties and is not affiliated with us or our advisor. The compensation we paid to Kroll was based on the scope of work and not on the appraised values of the Appraised Properties or the estimated value of our investment in units of the SREIT.
Real Estate
Appraisals
Kroll performed the appraisals in accordance with the Code of Ethics and the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice, or USPAP, and the real estate appraisal industry standards created by The Appraisal Foundation, as well as the requirements of the state where each real property is located. Each appraisal was reviewed, approved and signed by an individual with the professional designation of MAI (Member of the Appraisal Institute). The use of the reports is subject to the requirements of the Appraisal Institute relating to review by its duly authorized representatives.
Kroll collected all reasonably available material information that it deemed relevant in appraising the Appraised Properties. Kroll obtained property-level information from our advisor, including (i) property historical and projected operating revenues and expenses; (ii) property lease agreements; and (iii) information regarding recent or planned capital expenditures. Kroll reviewed and relied in part on the property-level information provided by our advisor and considered this information in light of its knowledge of each property’s specific market conditions.
In conducting its investigation and analyses, Kroll took into account customary and accepted financial and commercial procedures and considerations as it deemed relevant. Although Kroll reviewed information supplied or otherwise made available by us or our advisor for reasonableness, it assumed and relied upon the accuracy and completeness of all such information and of all information supplied or otherwise made available to it by any other party and did not independently verify any such information. With respect to operating or financial forecasts and other information and data provided to or otherwise reviewed by or discussed with Kroll, Kroll assumed that such forecasts and other information and data were reasonably prepared in good faith on bases reflecting the best currently available estimates and judgments of our management and/or our advisor. Kroll relied on us to advise it promptly if any information previously provided became inaccurate or was required to be updated during the period of its review.
In performing its analyses, Kroll made numerous other assumptions as of various points in time with respect to industry performance, general business, economic and regulatory conditions and other matters, many of which are beyond its and our control, as well as certain factual matters. For example, unless specifically informed to the contrary, Kroll assumed that we had clear and marketable title to each of the Appraised Properties, that no title defects existed, that any improvements were made in accordance with law, that no hazardous materials were present or had been present previously, that no deed restrictions existed, and that no changes to zoning ordinances or regulations governing use, density or shape were pending or being considered. Furthermore, Kroll’s analyses, opinions and conclusions were necessarily based upon market, economic, financial and other circumstances and conditions existing as of or prior to the date of the appraisals, and any material change in such circumstances and conditions (including future financial market disruptions related to COVID-19) may affect Kroll’s analyses and conclusions. Kroll’s appraisal reports contain other assumptions, qualifications and limitations that qualify the analyses, opinions and conclusions set forth therein. Furthermore, the prices at which the Appraised Properties may actually be sold could differ from their appraised values.
_____________________
(1) Kroll is actively engaged in the business of appraising commercial real estate properties similar to those owned by us in connection with public securities offerings, private placements, business combinations and similar transactions. We engaged Kroll to prepare appraisal reports for each of the Appraised Properties, to provide an estimated value of our investment in units of the SREIT and to provide a calculation of the range in estimated value per share of our common stock and Kroll received fees upon the delivery of such reports and the calculation of the range in estimated value per share of our common stock. In addition, we have agreed to indemnify Kroll against certain liabilities arising out of this engagement. In the two years prior to the date of this filing, Kroll and its affiliates have provided a number of commercial real estate, appraisal, valuation and financial advisory services for our affiliates and have received fees in connection with such services. Kroll and its affiliates may from time to time in the future perform other commercial real estate, appraisal, valuation and financial advisory services for us and our affiliates in transactions related to the properties that are the subjects of the appraisals, so long as such other services do not adversely affect the independence of the applicable Kroll appraiser as certified in the applicable appraisal report.
Although Kroll considered any comments to its appraisal reports received from us or our advisor, the appraised values of the Appraised Properties were determined by Kroll. The appraisal reports for the Appraised Properties are addressed solely to us to assist in the calculation of the range in estimated value per share of our common stock. The appraisal reports are not addressed to the public and may not be relied upon by any other person to establish an estimated value per share of our common stock and do not constitute a recommendation to any person to purchase or sell any shares of our common stock. In preparing its appraisal reports, Kroll did not solicit third-party indications of interest for the Appraised Properties. In preparing its appraisal reports and in calculating the range in estimated value per share of our common stock, Kroll did not, and was not requested to, solicit third-party indications of interest for our common stock in connection with possible purchases thereof or the acquisition of all or any part of us.
The foregoing is a summary of the standard assumptions, qualifications and limitations that generally apply to Kroll’s appraisal reports. All of the Kroll appraisal reports, including the analyses, opinions and conclusions set forth in such reports, are qualified by the assumptions, qualifications and limitations set forth in the respective appraisal reports.
Real Estate Valuation
As of September 30, 2021, we owned 18 real estate properties (consisting of 17 office properties and one mixed-use office/retail property). Kroll appraised each of our real estate properties, with the exception of Domain Gateway, an office property that was under contract to sell as of November 1, 2021 and was valued at its contractual sales price less estimated disposition costs and fees. Kroll appraised each of the Appraised Properties using various methodologies including the direct capitalization approach, discounted cash flow analyses and sales comparison approach and relied primarily on 10-year discounted cash flow analyses for the final appraisal of each of the Appraised Properties. Kroll calculated the discounted cash flow value of each of the Appraised Properties using property-level cash flow estimates, terminal capitalization rates and discount rates that fall within ranges it believes would be used by similar investors to value the Appraised Properties, based on recent comparable market transactions adjusted for unique properties and market-specific factors.
The total appraised value of the Appraised Properties as of September 30, 2021 was $3.0 billion. The estimated value for our one office property that was under contract to sell as of November 1, 2021 was $140.6 million. Our 18 real estate properties were acquired for a total purchase price of $2.2 billion, including $31.2 million of acquisition fees and acquisition expenses, and as of September 30, 2021, we had invested $616.5 million in capital expenses and tenant improvements in these properties. Based on the appraisal and valuation methodologies described above, the estimated value of our 18 real estate properties as of September 30, 2021 was $3.1 billion which, when compared to the total purchase price plus subsequent capital improvements through September 30, 2021 of $2.8 billion, results in an overall increase in the estimated value of these properties of approximately 10.7%.
The following table summarizes the key assumptions that Kroll used in the discounted cash flow analyses to arrive at the appraised value of the Appraised Properties:
Range in Values Weighted-Average Basis
Terminal capitalization rate 6.00% to 8.50% 6.36%
Discount rate 6.75% to 9.25% 7.29%
Net operating income compounded annual growth rate (1)
0.01% to 12.67%
5.46%
_____________________
(1) The net operating income compounded annual growth rates (the “CAGRs”) reflect both the contractual and market rents and reimbursements (in cases where the contractual lease period is less than the valuation period of the property) net of expenses over the valuation period for each of the properties. The range of CAGRs shown is the constant annual rate at which the net operating income is projected to grow to reach the net operating income in the final year of the hold period for each of the properties and can be significantly impacted by current occupancy at the properties. For appraised properties over 90% occupied, the CAGR range is 0.92% to 6.68% with a weighted average CAGR of 3.35%.
While we believe that Kroll’s assumptions and inputs are reasonable, a change in these assumptions and inputs would significantly impact the appraised value of the Appraised Properties and thus, our estimated value per share. The table below illustrates the impact on our estimated value per share if the terminal capitalization rates or discount rates Kroll used to appraise the Appraised Properties were adjusted by 25 basis points, assuming all other factors remain unchanged. Additionally, the table below illustrates the impact on our estimated value per share if these terminal capitalization rates or discount rates were adjusted by 5% in accordance with the IPA Valuation Guidelines, assuming all other factors remain unchanged:
Increase (Decrease) on the Estimated Value per Share due to
Decrease of 25 basis points Increase of 25 basis points Decrease of 5% Increase of 5%
Terminal capitalization rate $ 0.49 $ (0.48) $ 0.60 $ (0.59)
Discount rate 0.38 (0.38) 0.53 (0.55)
Finally, a 1% increase in the appraised value of the Appraised Properties would result in a $0.19 increase in our estimated value per share and a 1% decrease in the appraised value of the Appraised Properties would result in a decrease of $0.20 to our estimated value per share, assuming all other factors remain unchanged.
Investment in the SREIT
As of September 30, 2021, we owned 289,561,899 units of the SREIT (SGX-ST Ticker: OXMU), a Singapore real estate investment trust listed on the SGX-ST, which represented 24.8% of the outstanding units of the SREIT at that time. We concluded that based on our 24.8% ownership interest as of September 30, 2021, we exercised significant influence over the operations, financial policies and decision making with respect to the SREIT. Accordingly, we accounted for our investment in the SREIT under the equity method of accounting as of September 30, 2021.
We engaged Kroll to value our investment in units of the SREIT as of October 22, 2021 based on the SGX-ST trading price of the units of the SREIT as of closing on October 22, 2021 less a discount to account for holding period risk due to the quantity of units held by us relative to the normal level of trading volume in the SREIT units (“blockage”). Kroll estimated the percentage discount for the holding period risk applicable to our holdings as the quotient of the value of a hypothetical series of at-the-money put options relative to the freely traded market value of our holdings (i.e., the average of the high and low trading prices of the units times the number of units held by us), where each such put option corresponds to one of the expected future sales of such units in the public market over a period of time in which we could reasonably sell such units if desired, given the constraints imposed by blockage. Ultimately, the discount for the holding period risk may be attributable to blockage, which constrains the rate at which the holder can sell the subject units into a public market without upsetting the market’s equilibrium. Kroll’s analysis of the discount for the holding period risk applicable to our holdings had three elements: (i) analysis of trading volume in the SREIT’s units and the shares of other listed REITs in order to estimate the quantity of units that might be saleable by us in the public market; (ii) an estimate of the expected future price volatility of the SREIT’s units, which is the key variable in the valuation of the hypothetical series of put options; and (iii) application of the Black-Scholes model in the valuation of the series of put options. Based on their analysis, the estimated value of the units of the SREIT held by us as of October 22, 2021 was $227.3 million. The GAAP carrying value of our investment in the SREIT as of September 30, 2021, based on the equity method of accounting, was $218.7 million. The 289,561,899 units of the SREIT owned by us as of November 1, 2021 were acquired at an aggregate purchase price of $254.8 million.
While we believe that Kroll’s assumptions and inputs are reasonable, a change in these assumptions and inputs would significantly impact the estimated value of the units of the SREIT held by us and thus, our estimated value per share. The table below illustrates the impact on our estimated value per share if the volatility rate Kroll used to value these units was adjusted by 5% in accordance with the IPA Valuation Guidelines, assuming all other factors remain unchanged:
Increase (Decrease) on the Estimated Value per Share due to
Decrease of 5% Increase of 5%
Volatility rate $ 0.01 $ (0.01)
Notes Payable
The estimated values of our notes payable are equal to the GAAP fair values disclosed in our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2021, but do not equal the book value of the loans in accordance with GAAP. Our advisor estimated the values of our notes payable using a discounted cash flow analysis. The discounted cash flow analysis was based on projected cash flow over the remaining loan terms, including extensions we expect to exercise, and on management’s estimates of current market interest rates for instruments with similar characteristics, including remaining loan term, loan-to-value ratio, type of collateral and other credit enhancements.
As of September 30, 2021, the GAAP fair value and the carrying value of our notes payable were $1.6 billion and $1.6 billion, respectively. The weighted-average discount rate applied to the future estimated debt payments was approximately 2.2%. Our notes payable had a weighted-average remaining term of 1.4 years as of September 30, 2021.
The table below illustrates the impact on our estimated value per share if the discount rates our advisor used to value our notes payable were adjusted by 25 basis points, assuming all other factors remain unchanged. Additionally, the table below illustrates the impact on our estimated value per share if these discount rates were adjusted by 5% in accordance with the IPA Valuation Guidelines, assuming all other factors remain unchanged:
Increase (Decrease) on the Estimated Value per Share due to
Decrease of 25 basis points Increase of 25 basis points Decrease of 5% Increase of 5%
Discount rate $ (0.04) $ 0.03 $ (0.02) $ 0.01
Other Assets and Liabilities
The carrying values of a majority of our other assets and liabilities are considered to equal their fair value due to their short maturities or liquid nature. Certain balances, such as straight-line rent receivables, lease intangible assets and liabilities, accrued capital expenditures, deferred financing costs, unamortized lease commissions and unamortized lease incentives, have been eliminated for the purpose of the valuation due to the fact that the value of those balances was already considered in the valuation of the related asset or liability. Our advisor has also excluded redeemable common stock, as temporary equity does not represent a true liability to us and the shares that this amount represents are included in our total outstanding shares of common stock for purposes of calculating the estimated value per share of our common stock.
Limitations of the Estimated Value per Share
As mentioned above, we provided this estimated value per share to assist broker-dealers that participated in our now-terminated initial public offering in meeting their customer account statement reporting obligations. The estimated value per share set forth above first appeared on the November 30, 2021 customer account statements that were mailed in December 2021. This valuation was performed in accordance with the provisions of and also to comply with the IPA Valuation Guidelines. As with any valuation methodology, the methodologies used are based upon a number of estimates and assumptions that may not be accurate or complete. Different parties with different assumptions and estimates could derive a different estimated value per share of our common stock, and this difference could be significant. The estimated value per share is not audited and does not represent the fair value of our assets less the fair value of our liabilities according to GAAP.
Accordingly, with respect to the estimated value per share, we can give no assurance that:
•a stockholder would be able to resell his or her shares at our estimated value per share;
•a stockholder would ultimately realize distributions per share equal to our estimated value per share upon liquidation of our assets and settlement of our liabilities or a sale of our company;
•our shares of common stock would trade at the estimated value per share on a national securities exchange;
•another independent third-party appraiser or third-party valuation firm would agree with our estimated value per share; or
•the methodology used to determine our estimated value per share would be acceptable to FINRA or for compliance with ERISA reporting requirements.
Further, the estimated value per share is based on the estimated value of our assets less the estimated value of our liabilities, divided by the number of shares outstanding, all as of September 30, 2021, with the exception of adjustments to our net asset value to give effect to (i) the change in the estimated value of our investment in units of the SREIT (SGX-ST Ticker: OXMU) as of October 22, 2021 and (ii) the contractual sales price less estimated disposition costs and fees of one property that was under contract to sell as of November 1, 2021. We did not make any other adjustments to the estimated value per share subsequent to September 30, 2021, including any adjustments relating to the following, among others: (i) the issuance of common stock and the payment of related offering costs related to our dividend reinvestment plan offering; (ii) net operating income earned and distributions declared; and (iii) the redemption of shares. The value of our shares will fluctuate over time in response to developments related to future investments, the performance of individual assets in our portfolio and the management of those assets, the real estate and finance markets and due to other factors. In particular, the COVID-19 pandemic, together with the resulting measures imposed to help control the spread of the virus, has had a negative impact on the economy and business activity globally. The COVID-19 pandemic is negatively impacting many industries, including the U.S. office real estate industry and the industries of our tenants, directly or indirectly. While we considered the impact from COVID-19 on our November 1, 2021 estimated value per share, the extent to which the COVID-19 pandemic impacts our operations and those of our tenants and our investment in the SREIT depends on future developments, which are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted with confidence, including the scope, severity and duration of the pandemic, the actions taken to contain the pandemic or mitigate its impact, and the direct and indirect economic effects of the pandemic and containment measures, among others.
Our estimated value per share does not reflect a discount for the fact that we are externally managed, nor does it reflect a real estate portfolio premium/discount versus the sum of the individual property values. Our estimated value per share does not take into account estimated disposition costs and fees for real estate properties that were not under contract to sell as of November 1, 2021, debt prepayment penalties that could apply upon the prepayment of certain of our debt obligations, the impact of restrictions on the assumption of debt or swap breakage fees that may be incurred upon the termination of certain of our swaps prior to expiration. We have generally incurred disposition costs and fees related to the sale of each real estate property since inception of 0.8% to 2.9% of the gross sales price less concessions and credits, with the weighted average being approximately 1.4%. The estimated value per share does not take into consideration acquisition-related costs and financing costs related to any future acquisitions subsequent to November 1, 2021. We currently expect to utilize an independent valuation firm to update our estimated value per share no later than December 2022.
Historical Estimated Values per Share
The historical reported estimated values per share of our common stock approved by the board of directors are set forth below:
Estimated Value per Share
Effective Date of Valuation
Filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission
$10.77 May 13, 2021 Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on May 14, 2021
$10.74 December 7, 2020 Part II, Item 5 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the Year Ended
December 31, 2020, filed March 12, 2021
$11.65 (1)
December 4, 2019 Part II, Item 5 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the Year Ended December 31, 2019, filed March 6, 2020
$12.02 December 3, 2018 Part II, Item 5 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the Year Ended December 31, 2018, filed March 14, 2019
$11.73 December 6, 2017
Part II, Item 5 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the Year Ended December 31, 2017, filed March 8, 2018
$10.63 December 9, 2016
Part II, Item 5 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the Year Ended December 31, 2016, filed March 13, 2017
$10.04 December 8, 2015
Part II, Item 5 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the Year Ended December 31, 2015, filed March 14, 2016
$9.42 (2)
December 9, 2014
Part II, Item 5 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the Year Ended December 31, 2014, filed March 9, 2015
$9.29 (2)
May 5, 2014
Supplement no. 3 to our prospectus dated April 25, 2014 (Registration No. 333-164703), filed May 6, 2014
_____________________
(1) Excluding the special dividend, our estimated value per share of common stock would have been $12.45.
(2) Determined solely to be used as a component in calculating the offering prices in our now-terminated primary initial public offering.
Distribution Information
We have paid, and expect to continue to pay, distributions on a monthly basis. The rate is determined by our board of directors based on our financial condition and other factors our board of directors deems relevant. Our board of directors has not pre-established a percentage range of return for distributions to stockholders. We have not established a minimum distribution level, and our charter does not require that we pay distributions to our stockholders.
Generally, our policy is to pay distributions from current or prior period cash flow from operations (except with respect to distributions related to sales of our assets and distributions related to the sales or repayment of real estate-related investments). From time to time during our operational stage, we may not pay distributions solely from our current or prior period cash flow from operations. Further, because we may receive income from interest or rents at various times during our fiscal year and because we may need cash flow from operations during a particular period to fund capital expenditures and other expenses, we expect that, from time to time, we will declare distributions in anticipation of cash flow that we expect to receive during a later period and we will pay these distributions in advance of our actual receipt of these funds. In these instances, we have funded our distributions with debt financings and we may utilize debt financing in the future, if necessary, to fund at least a portion of our distributions. As discussed above, we may also fund distributions with proceeds from the sale of assets or from the sales or repayment of real estate-related investments. Our organizational documents permit us to pay distributions from any source, including offering proceeds or borrowings (which may constitute a return of capital), and our charter does not limit the amount of funds we may use from any source to pay such distributions. Our distribution policy is not to use the proceeds from an offering to pay distributions. If we pay distributions from sources other than our cash flow from operations, the overall return to our stockholders may be reduced.
Our operating performance cannot be accurately predicted and may deteriorate in the future due to numerous factors, including those discussed under “Forward-Looking Statements,” “Summary Risk Factors”, Part I, Item 1A, “Risk Factors” and Part II, Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.” Those factors include: the future operating performance of our real estate investments in the existing real estate and financial environment; the success and economic viability of our tenants; our ability to refinance existing indebtedness at comparable terms; changes in interest rates on any variable rate debt obligations we incur; the level of participation in our dividend reinvestment plan; and the extent to which the COVID-19 pandemic impacts our operations and those of our tenants and our investment in the SREIT. In the event our FFO and/or cash flow from operating activities decrease in the future, the level of our distributions may also decrease. In addition, future distributions declared and paid may exceed FFO and/or cash flow from operating activities.
We have elected to be taxed as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code and we intend to operate in such a manner. To maintain our qualification as a REIT, we must meet certain organizational and operational requirements, including a requirement to distribute at least 90% of our REIT taxable income (computed without regard to the dividends-paid deduction or net capital gain and which does not necessarily equal net income as calculated in accordance with GAAP). Our board of directors may authorize distributions in excess of those required for us to maintain REIT status depending on our financial condition and such other factors as our board of directors deems relevant.
During 2021 and 2020, we declared distributions based on a monthly record date for each month during the period commencing January 2020 through December 2021. We paid distributions for all record dates of a given month on or about the first business day of the following month; however, we accelerated the payment of the June 2021 distributions due to the timing of the Self-Tender. Distributions declared during 2021 and 2020, aggregated by quarter, are as follows (dollars in thousands, except per share amounts):
1st Quarter 2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter 4th Quarter Total
Total Distributions Declared $ 27,640 $ 27,755 $ 23,863 $ 23,361 $ 102,619
Total Per Share Distribution (1) (2)
$ 0.149 $ 0.149 $ 0.150 $ 0.150 $ 0.598
1st Quarter 2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter 4th Quarter Total
Total Distributions Declared $ 27,149 $ 27,268 $ 27,388 $ 27,517 $ 109,322
Total Per Share Distribution (1) (2)
$ 0.149 $ 0.149 $ 0.150 $ 0.150 $ 0.598
_____________________
(1) Distributions declared per common share assumes each share was issued and outstanding each day that was a monthly record date for distributions during the period presented.
(2) For each monthly record date for distributions during the period from January 1, 2020 through December 31, 2021, distributions were calculated at a rate of $0.04983333 per share.
The tax composition of our distributions declared for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 was as follows:
2021 2020
Ordinary Income 20 % 31 %
Capital Gain 77 % 43 %
Return of Capital 3 % 26 %
Total 100 % 100 %
For more information with respect to our distributions paid, see Part II, Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Distributions.”
2022 Distributions
Our board of directors has declared the following distributions for the period from January 2022 through April 2022:
Period Record Date Distributions Declared Per Share (1)
January 2022 January 24, 2022 $0.04983333
February 2022 February 22, 2022 $0.04983333
March 2022 March 28, 2022 $0.04983333
April 2022 April 20, 2022 $0.04983333
_____________________
(1) Distributions are generally paid on a monthly basis. Distributions for the monthly record date of a given month are generally paid on or about the first business day of the following month.
Stockholders may choose to receive cash distributions or purchase additional shares through our dividend reinvestment plan, unless we designate the distribution to be paid in cash to all stockholders and not eligible for reinvestment through the dividend reinvestment plan. We designated the February 2022 distribution to be paid in cash to all stockholders as of the record date.
Use of Proceeds from Sales of Registered Securities and Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities
During the year ended December 31, 2021, we did not sell any equity securities that were not registered under the Securities Act of 1933.
Amended and Restated Share Redemption Program
We have a share redemption program that may enable stockholders to sell their shares to us in limited circumstances. The restrictions of our share redemption program will limit our stockholders’ ability to sell their shares should they require liquidity and will limit our stockholders’ ability to recover an amount equal to our estimated value per share.
The following is a description of our share redemption program from January 1, 2021 through June 30, 2021 and the amendments to the program made by the amended and restated share redemption program (the “Amended Share Redemption Program”), which became effective as of the July 30, 2021 redemption date. On March 17, 2022, our board of directors approved a further amendment to our share redemption program. See Part II, Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Subsequent Events - Amended and Restated Share Redemption Program.”
In December 2019, our board of directors determined to temporarily suspend Ordinary Redemptions under the share redemption program, and Ordinary Redemptions remained suspended through June 30, 2021. Ordinary Redemptions are all redemptions other than those that qualify for the special provisions for redemptions sought in connection with a stockholder’s death, “Qualifying Disability” or “Determination of Incompetence” (each as defined in the share redemption program and, together, “Special Redemptions”). Upon suspension, all Ordinary Redemption requests that had been received were cancelled and no Ordinary Redemption requests were accepted or collected during the suspension of the share redemption program. Further, on June 3, 2021, we announced that, in connection with the approval of the Self-Tender (defined below), our board of directors approved a temporary suspension of all redemptions under the share redemption program, including Special Redemptions. Upon suspension, all outstanding redemption requests under the share redemption program were cancelled, and no requests were accepted or collected under the share redemption program. As such, Special Redemptions under the share redemption program were suspended for the June 30, 2021 redemption date, meaning no Special Redemptions were made under the share redemption program in June 2021. Ordinary Redemptions and Special Redemptions resumed effective for the July 30, 2021 redemption date under the Amended Share Redemption Program.
In order to provide stockholders with additional liquidity that is in excess of that permitted under our share redemption program, on June 4, 2021, we commenced a self-tender offer (the “Self-Tender”) for up to 33,849,130 shares of common stock at a price of $10.34 per share, or approximately $350.0 million of shares. On July 12, 2021, we accepted for purchase 26,375,383 shares properly tendered and not properly withdrawn at a purchase price of $10.34 per share, or approximately $272.7 million of shares, excluding fees and expenses relating to the tender offer.
There are several limitations on our ability to redeem shares under our share redemption program:
•Unless the shares are being redeemed in connection with a Special Redemption, we may not redeem shares unless the stockholder has held the shares for one year.
•Except as provided otherwise in the Amended Share Redemption Program with respect to calendar year 2021 only, during any calendar year, we may redeem only the number of shares that we could purchase with the amount of net proceeds from the sale of shares under our dividend reinvestment plan during the prior calendar year, provided that once we have received requests for redemptions, whether in connection with Special Redemptions or otherwise, that if honored, and when combined with all prior redemptions made during the calendar year, would result in the amount of remaining funds available for the redemption of additional shares in such calendar year being $10.0 million or less, the last $10.0 million of available funds shall be reserved exclusively for Special Redemptions. Notwithstanding anything contained in our share redemption program to the contrary, we may increase or decrease the funding available for the redemption of shares pursuant to the program upon ten business days’ notice to our stockholders.
•Pursuant to the Amended Share Redemption Program, for calendar year 2021 only, we could redeem up to 5% of the weighted-average number of shares outstanding during the 2020 calendar year, provided that, if we received requests for redemptions, whether in connection with Special Redemptions or otherwise, that if honored, and when combined with all prior redemptions made during the 2021 calendar year, would result in the number of remaining shares available for redemption in the 2021 calendar year being 500,000 or less, the last 500,000 shares available for redemption were reserved exclusively for Special Redemptions.
•During any calendar year, we may redeem no more than 5% of the weighted-average number of shares outstanding during the prior calendar year.
•We have no obligation to redeem shares if the redemption would violate the restrictions on distributions under Maryland General Corporation Law, as amended from time to time, which prohibits distributions that would cause a corporation to fail to meet statutory tests of solvency.
For purposes of determining the time period a redeeming stockholder has held each share, the time period begins as of the date the stockholder acquired the share; provided, that shares purchased by the redeeming stockholder pursuant to our dividend reinvestment plan or received as a stock dividend will be deemed to have been acquired on the same date as the initial share to which the dividend reinvestment plan shares or stock dividend shares relate. The date of the share’s original issuance by us is not determinative.
For a stockholder’s shares to be eligible for redemption in a given month, the administrator must receive a written redemption request from the stockholder or from an authorized representative of the stockholder setting forth the number of shares requested to be redeemed at least five business days before the redemption date. We redeem shares on the last business day of each month, except that the first redemption date following our establishment of an estimated value per share shall be no less than ten business days after our announcement of such estimated value per share in a filing with the SEC and the redemption date shall be set forth in such filing. If we cannot redeem all shares presented for redemption in any month because of the limitations on redemptions set forth in our share redemption program, then we will honor redemption requests on a pro rata basis, except that if a pro rata redemption would result in a stockholder owning less than the minimum purchase requirement described in our currently effective, or the most recently effective, registration statement, as such registration statement has been amended or supplemented, then we would redeem all of such stockholder’s shares.
If we do not completely satisfy a redemption request on a redemption date because the program administrator did not receive the request in time, because of the limitations on redemptions set forth in our share redemption program or because of a suspension of our share redemption program, then we will treat the unsatisfied portion of the redemption request as a request for redemption at the next redemption date funds are available for redemption, unless the redemption request is withdrawn; provided that during the suspension of Ordinary Redemptions and Special Redemptions described above, all redemption requests that had been received were cancelled and no redemption requests were accepted or collected during the suspension. Any stockholder can withdraw a redemption request by sending written notice to the program administrator, provided such notice is received at least five business days before the redemption date.
Upon a transfer of shares, any pending redemption requests with respect to such transferred shares will be canceled as of the date we accept the transfer. Stockholders wishing us to continue to consider a redemption request related to any transferred shares must resubmit their redemption request.
Pursuant to our share redemption program, redemptions made in connection with Special Redemptions are made at a price per share equal to the most recent estimated value per share of our common stock as of the applicable redemption date.
Through June 30, 2021, Ordinary Redemptions were made at a price per share equal to 95% of our most recent estimated value per share as of the applicable redemption date. Under the Amended Share Redemption Program, commencing with the July 30, 2021 redemption date, Ordinary Redemptions are made at a price per share equal to 96% of our most recent estimated value per share as of the applicable redemption date.
On December 7, 2020, our board of directors approved an estimated value per share of our common stock of $10.74 based on the estimated value of our assets less the estimated value of our liabilities divided by the number of shares outstanding, all as of September 30, 2020, with the exception of adjustments to our net asset value to give effect to the change in the estimated value of our investment in units of the SREIT (SGX-ST Ticker: OXMU) as of December 1, 2020. Effective December 7, 2020 and through May 13, 2021, the redemption price for all shares eligible for redemption was calculated based on the December 7, 2020 estimated value per share.
On May 13, 2021, our board of directors approved an estimated value per share of our common stock of $10.77 based on the estimated value of our assets less the estimated value of our liabilities divided by the number of shares outstanding, all as of March 31, 2021, with the exception of adjustments to our net asset value to give effect to the change in the estimated value of our investment in units of the SREIT (SGX-ST Ticker: OXMU) as of April 29, 2021. Effective May 13, 2021 and through November 1, 2021, the redemption price for all shares eligible for redemption was calculated based on the May 13, 2021 estimated value per share.
On November 1, 2021, our board of directors approved an estimated value per share of our common stock of $10.78 based on the estimated value of our assets less the estimated value of our liabilities divided by the number of shares outstanding, all as of September 30, 2021, with the exception of adjustments to our net asset value to give effect to (i) the change in the estimated value of our investment in units of the SREIT (SGX-ST Ticker: OXMU) as of October 22, 2021 and (ii) the contractual sales price less estimated disposition costs and fees of one property that was under contract to sell as of November 1, 2021. Effective for the November 2021 redemption date, which was November 30, 2021, and until the estimated value per share is updated, the redemption price for all shares eligible for redemption will be calculated based on the November 1, 2021 estimated value per share.
We currently expect to utilize an independent valuation firm to update our estimated value per share no later than December 2022. We will report the estimated value per share of our common stock in a Current Report on Form 8-K or in our annual or quarterly reports, all publicly filed with the SEC. We will also provide information about our estimated value per share on our website, www.kbsreitiii.com (such information may be provided by means of a link to our public filings on the SEC’s website, www.sec.gov).
Our board of directors may amend, suspend or terminate our share redemption program upon ten business days’ notice to stockholders, and consistent with SEC guidance and interpretations, we may increase or decrease the funding available for the redemption of shares pursuant to our share redemption program upon ten business days’ notice. We may provide notice by including such information (a) in a Current Report on Form 8-K or in our annual or quarterly reports, all publicly filed with the SEC or (b) in a separate mailing to our stockholders. The complete share redemption program document is filed as an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on July 16, 2021 and is available at the SEC’s website, www.sec.gov.
During the year ended December 31, 2021, we funded redemptions under our share redemption program with the net proceeds from our dividend reinvestment plan and debt financing, and we redeemed shares pursuant to our share redemption program as follows:
Month Total Number of
Shares Redeemed (1)
Average Price Paid
Per Share (2)
Approximate Dollar Value of Shares
Available That May Yet Be Redeemed
Under the Program
January 2021 101,887 $ 10.74 (3)
February 2021 107,443 $ 10.74 (3)
March 2021 80,409 $ 10.74 (3)
April 2021 179,398 $ 10.74 (3)
May 2021 96,964 $ 10.77 (3)
June 2021 - $ - (3)
July 2021 159,922 $ 10.50 (3)
August 2021 1,412,169 $ 10.39 (3)
September 2021 1,736,860 $ 10.38 (3)
October 2021 1,816,613 $ 10.37 (3)
November 2021 1,104,279 $ 10.39 (3)
December 2021 2,072,048 $ 10.38 (3)
Total 8,867,992
_____________________
(1) We announced the adoption and commencement of the program on October 14, 2010. We announced amendments to the program on March 8, 2013 (which amendment became effective on April 7, 2013), on March 7, 2014 (which amendment became effective on April 6, 2014), on May 9, 2018 (which amendment became effective on June 8, 2018) and on July 16, 2021 (which amendment became effective on July 30, 2021).
(2) The prices at which we redeem shares under the program are as set forth above.
(3) Based on the amount of net proceeds raised from the sale of shares under our dividend reinvestment plan during 2021, we had an aggregate of $42.4 million available for redemptions in 2022, including the reserve for Special Redemptions. As of March 1, 2022, we had $17.4 million available for redemptions for the remainder of 2022 under the Amended Share Redemption Program described above, including the reserve for Special Redemptions. See Part II, Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Subsequent Events - Amended and Restated Share Redemption Program.”
For the months of January 2021 through May 2021, we fulfilled all Special Redemption requests eligible for redemption under our share redemption program and received in good order. For the months of July 2021 through December 2021, we fulfilled all Ordinary Redemption and Special Redemption requests eligible for redemption under our share redemption program and received in good order.

---

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
ITEM 6. [RESERVED]

---

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS
The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the accompanying consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto. Also see “Forward-Looking Statements” and “Summary Risk Factors” preceding Part I and Part I, Item 1A, “Risk Factors.”
Overview
We were formed on December 22, 2009 as a Maryland corporation that elected to be taxed as a REIT beginning with the taxable year ended December 31, 2011 and we intend to continue to operate in such a manner. We conduct our business primarily through our Operating Partnership, of which we are the sole general partner. Subject to certain restrictions and limitations, our business is managed by our advisor pursuant to an advisory agreement and our advisor conducts our operations and manages our portfolio of real estate investments. Our advisor owns 20,857 shares of our common stock. We have no paid employees.
We have invested in a diverse portfolio of real estate investments. As of December 31, 2021, we owned 16 office properties, one mixed-use office/retail property and an investment in the equity securities of the SREIT.
Our conflicts committee and our board of directors continue to evaluate various alternatives available to us, including whether or not to convert to an “NAV REIT.” Our conflicts committee and board of directors remain focused on providing stable distributions and enhanced liquidity to stockholders. In the near term, while our conflicts committee and board of directors explore alternatives available to us, we may market certain of our assets for sale. Based on our assessment of alternatives available to us, market conditions and our further assessment of our capital raising prospects, our conflicts committee and board of directors may conclude that it would be in the best interest of our stockholders to (i) convert to an “NAV REIT,” (ii) continue to operate as a going concern under our current business plan, or (iii) adopt a plan of liquidation that would involve the sale of our remaining assets (in which event such plan would be presented to stockholders for approval). There is no assurance that any alternative being considered by our board of directors will provide a return to stockholders that equals or exceeds the Company’s estimated value per share as of November 1, 2021, and although we remain focused on providing enhanced liquidity to stockholders while maximizing returns to stockholders, we can provide no assurances in this regard. We also can provide no assurances as to whether or when any alternative being considered by our board of directors will be consummated. See Part I, Item 1A, “Risk Factors - Risks of the Proposed NAV REIT Conversion” and Part III, Item 13, “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director Independence - Report of the Conflicts Committee - Certain Transactions with Related Persons.”
Section 5.11 of our charter requires that we seek stockholder approval of our liquidation if our shares of common stock are not listed on a national securities exchange by September 30, 2020, unless a majority of the conflicts committee of our board of directors, composed solely of all of our independent directors, determines that liquidation is not then in the best interest of our stockholders. Pursuant to our charter requirement, the conflicts committee assessed our portfolio of investments, and with consideration of the then current market conditions, including the uncertainty as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic and lack of liquidity in the marketplace, as well as our conflicts committee’s and board of directors’ continuing review and evaluation of various alternatives available to us, on August 30, 2021, our conflicts committee unanimously determined to postpone approval of our liquidation. Section 5.11 of our charter requires that the conflicts committee revisit the issue of liquidation at least annually. At our annual meeting of stockholders held on May 7, 2020, our stockholders approved the removal of Section 5.11 of our charter. As set forth in the proxy statement for our annual meeting of stockholders, implementation of this amendment to our charter and our conversion to an NAV REIT remain subject to further approval of our conflicts committee. See Part I, Item 1A, “Risk Factors - Risks of the Proposed NAV REIT Conversion.”
Market Outlook - Real Estate and Real Estate Finance Markets
Volatility in global financial markets and changing political environments can cause fluctuations in the performance of the U.S. commercial real estate markets. Possible future declines in rental rates, slower or potentially negative net absorption of leased space and expectations of future rental concessions, including free rent to renew tenants early, to retain tenants who are up for renewal or to attract new tenants, may result in decreases in cash flows from investment properties. Further, revenues from our properties could decrease due to a reduction in occupancy (caused by factors including, but not limited to, tenant defaults, tenant insolvency, early termination of tenant leases and non-renewal of existing tenant leases), rent deferrals or abatements, tenants being unable to pay their rent and/or lower rental rates. To the extent there are increases in the cost of financing due to higher interest rates, this may cause difficulty in refinancing debt obligations at terms as favorable as the terms of existing indebtedness. Further, increases in interest rates would increase the amount of our debt payments on our variable rate debt to the extent the interest rates on such debt are not fixed through interest rate swap agreements or limited by interest rate caps. Market conditions can change quickly, potentially negatively impacting the value of real estate investments. Management continuously reviews our investment and debt financing strategies to optimize our portfolio and the cost of our debt exposure. Most recently, the COVID-19 pandemic has had a negative impact on the real estate market as discussed below.
COVID-19 Pandemic and Portfolio Outlook
As of December 31, 2021, the novel coronavirus, or COVID-19, pandemic is ongoing. The spread of COVID-19 in many countries, including the United States, has significantly adversely impacted global economic activity and has contributed to significant volatility in financial markets. The global impact of the pandemic has been rapidly evolving and many countries, states and localities, including states and localities in the United States, have reacted by restricting many business and travel activities, mandating the partial or complete closures of certain businesses and schools and taking other actions to mitigate the spread of the virus, most of which have a disruptive effect on economic activity, including the use of and demand for office space. Many private businesses, including some of our tenants, continue to recommend or mandate some or all of their employees work from home or are rotating employees in and out of the office to encourage social distancing in the workplace. Due to these events, during 2021, the usage of our assets remained lower than pre-pandemic levels. In addition, we experienced a significant reduction in leasing interest and activity when compared to pre-pandemic levels.
We cannot predict when, if and to what extent these restrictions and other actions will end and when, if and to what extent economic activity, including the use of and demand for office space, will return to pre-pandemic levels. Even after the pandemic has ceased to be active, the prevalence of work-from-home policies during the pandemic may alter tenant preferences in the long-term with respect to the demand for leasing office space.
The outbreak of COVID-19 and its impact on the current financial, economic, capital markets and real estate market environment, and future developments in these and other areas present uncertainty and risk with respect to our financial condition, results of operations, liquidity, and ability to pay distributions. Although a recovery is partially underway, it continues to be gradual, uneven and characterized by meaningful dispersion across sectors and regions, and could be hindered by persistent or resurgent infection rates. Issues with respect to the distribution and acceptance of vaccines or the spread of new variants of the virus could adversely impact the recovery. Overall, there remains significant uncertainty regarding the timing and duration of the economic recovery, which precludes any prediction as to the ultimate adverse impact COVID-19 may have on our business.
During the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, we did not experience significant disruptions in our operations from the COVID-19 pandemic. Many of our tenants have suffered reductions in revenue since March 2020. Rent collections for the quarter ended December 31, 2021 were approximately 99%. We have granted a number of lease concessions related to the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic but these lease concessions did not have a material impact to our consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2021 or consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2021. As of December 31, 2021, we had entered into lease amendments related to the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, granting $4.2 million of rent deferrals for the period from March 2020 through September 2021 and granting $2.9 million in rental abatements.
As of December 31, 2021, 81 tenants were granted rental deferrals, rental abatements and/or rent restructures, of which 49 of these tenants have begun to pay rent in accordance with their lease agreements subsequent to the deferral and/or abatement period, six of these tenants early terminated their leases and eight of these tenant leases were modified at lower rental rates and/or based on a percentage of the tenant’s gross receipts. As of December 31, 2021, two of the 81 tenants continue to be in the rental deferral and/or rental abatement periods as granted in accordance with their agreements. Through December 31, 2021, $2.8 million of rent previously deferred has been billed to the tenants, of which $2.4 million was collected.
As of December 31, 2021, we had $1.4 million of receivables for lease payments that had been deferred as lease concessions related to the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, of which $1.1 million was reserved for payments not probable of collection, which were included in rent and other receivables, net on the accompanying consolidated balance sheet. For the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, we recorded $1.2 million and $1.5 million, respectively, of rental abatements granted to tenants as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. Subsequent to December 31, 2021, we have not seen a material impact on our rent collections. We are in discussions with several retail tenants to extend additional short-term deferrals. We will continue to evaluate any additional short-term rent relief requests from tenants on an individual basis. Not all tenant requests will ultimately result in modified agreements, nor are we forgoing our contractual rights under our lease agreements. In most cases, it is in our best interest to help our tenants remain in business and reopen when restrictions are lifted. Current collections and rent relief requests to date may not be indicative of collections or requests in any future period.
During the year ended December 31, 2020, we recognized an impairment charge of $19.9 million for an office/retail property due to the continued deterioration of retail demand at the property which was further impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic.
We have also made a significant investment in the common units of the SREIT. Since early March 2020, the trading price of the common units of the SREIT has experienced substantial volatility; however, the units have recovered a portion of their losses since the low in March 2020. As of March 31, 2022, the aggregate value of our investment in the units of the SREIT was $163.0 million, which was based solely on the closing price of the units on the SGX-ST of $0.755 per unit as of March 31, 2022 and did not take into account any potential discount for the holding period risk due to the quantity of units we hold.
Should we experience significant reductions in rental revenue in the future related to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, this may limit our ability to draw on our revolving credit facilities or exercise our extension options due to covenants described in our loan agreements. However, we believe that our cash flow from operations, cash on hand, proceeds from our dividend reinvestment plan, proceeds from asset sales and current and anticipated financing activities are sufficient to meet our liquidity needs for the foreseeable future.
Our business, like all businesses, is being impacted by the uncertainty regarding the COVID-19 pandemic, the effectiveness of policies introduced to neutralize the disease, and the impact of those policies on economic activity. While there are weakening macroeconomic conditions and some negative impact to our tenants, we believe with our diverse portfolio of core real estate properties with tenants across various industries, and with creditworthy tenants and limited retail exposure in our real estate portfolio, we are positioned to navigate this unprecedented period.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our principal demands for funds during the short and long-term are and will be for operating expenses, capital expenditures and general and administrative expenses; payments under debt obligations; redemptions of common stock; and payments of distributions to stockholders. Our primary sources of capital for meeting our cash requirements are as follows:
•Cash flow generated by our real estate and real estate-related investments;
•Debt financings (including amounts currently available under existing loan facilities);
•Proceeds from the sale of our real estate properties and real estate-related investments; and
•Proceeds from common stock issued under our dividend reinvestment plan.
Our real estate properties generate cash flow in the form of rental revenues and tenant reimbursements, which are reduced by operating expenditures, capital expenditures, debt service payments, the payment of asset management fees and corporate general and administrative expenses. Cash flow from operations from our real estate properties is primarily dependent upon the occupancy level of our portfolio, the net effective rental rates on our leases, the collectability of rent and operating recoveries from our tenants and how well we manage our expenditures.
Our investment in the equity securities of the SREIT generates cash flow in the form of dividend income, and dividends are typically declared and paid on a semi-annual basis, though dividends are not guaranteed. As of December 31, 2021, we held 215,841,899 units of the SREIT which represented 18.5% of the outstanding units of the SREIT as of that date.
As of December 31, 2021, we had mortgage debt obligations in the aggregate principal amount of $1.5 billion, with a weighted-average remaining term of 1.8 years. The maturity dates of certain loans may be extended beyond their current maturity date, subject to certain terms and conditions contained in the loan documents. As of December 31, 2021, we did not have any debt maturing during the 12 months ending December 31, 2022. We plan to exercise our extension options available under our loan agreements, pay down or refinance the related notes payable prior to their maturity dates. As of December 31, 2021, our debt obligations consisted of $123.0 million of fixed rate notes payable and $1.3 billion of variable rate notes payable. As of December 31, 2021, the interest rates on $1.1 billion of our variable rate notes payable were effectively fixed through interest rate swap agreements. As of December 31, 2021, we had $312.3 million of revolving debt available for future disbursement under various loans, subject to certain conditions set forth in the loan agreements.
In order to provide stockholders with additional liquidity that is in excess of that permitted under our share redemption program, on June 4, 2021, we commenced a self-tender offer (the “Self-Tender”) for up to 33,849,130 shares of our common stock at a price of $10.34 per share, or approximately $350.0 million of shares. On July 12, 2021, we accepted for purchase 26,375,383 shares properly tendered and not properly withdrawn at a purchase price of $10.34 per share, or approximately $272.7 million of shares, excluding fees and expenses relating to the tender offer. We funded the purchase of shares in the offer with approximately $100.0 million of available cash on hand and by drawing on our existing credit facilities in an aggregate amount of approximately $172.7 million.
We paid cash distributions to our stockholders during the year ended December 31, 2021 using cash flow from operations from current and prior periods and proceeds from the sale of real estate. We believe that our cash flow from operations, cash on hand, proceeds from our dividend reinvestment plan, proceeds from asset sales and current and anticipated financing activities are sufficient to meet our liquidity needs for the foreseeable future.
Under our charter, we are required to limit our total operating expenses to the greater of 2% of our average invested assets or 25% of our net income for the four most recently completed fiscal quarters, as these terms are defined in our charter, unless the conflicts committee has determined that such excess expenses were justified based on unusual and non-recurring factors. Operating expenses for the four fiscal quarters ended December 31, 2021 did not exceed the charter-imposed limitation.
Cash Flows from Operating Activities
During the year ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, net cash provided by operating activities was $100.8 million and $101.7 million, respectively.
Cash Flows from Investing Activities
Net cash provided by investing activities was $226.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2021 and primarily consisted of the following:
•$237.7 million of net proceeds from the sales of Anchor Centre and Domain Gateway; and
•$58.9 million of net proceeds from the sale of equity securities of the SREIT; offset by
•$70.1 million used for improvements to real estate.
Cash Flows from Financing Activities
During the year ended December 31, 2021, net cash used in financing activities was $358.7 million and primarily consisted of the following:
•$365.6 million of cash used for redemptions and repurchases of common stock, including $272.7 million of shares repurchased pursuant to the Self-Tender;
•$72.8 million of net cash provided by debt financing as a result of proceeds from notes payable of $806.0 million, partially offset by principal payments on notes payable of $730.5 million and payments of deferred financing costs of $2.7 million;
•$61.7 million of net cash distributions, after giving effect to distributions reinvested by stockholders of $42.4 million;
•$3.0 million used for interest rate swap settlements for off-market swap instruments; and
•Payment of other organization and offering costs of $1.2 million related to our pursuit of conversion to an NAV REIT.
We expect that our debt financing and other liabilities will be between 45% and 65% of the cost of our tangible assets (before deducting depreciation and other non-cash reserves). There is no limitation on the amount we may borrow for the purchase of any single asset. We limit our total liabilities to 75% of the cost of our tangible assets (before deducting depreciation and other non-cash reserves), meaning that our borrowings and other liabilities may exceed our maximum target leverage of 65% of the cost of our tangible assets without violating these borrowing restrictions. We may exceed the 75% limit only if a majority of the conflicts committee approves each borrowing in excess of this limitation and we disclose such borrowings to our stockholders in our next quarterly report with an explanation from the conflicts committee of the justification for the excess borrowing. To the extent financing in excess of this limit is available on attractive terms, our conflicts committee may approve debt in excess of this limit. From time to time, our total liabilities could also be below 45% of the cost of our tangible assets due to the lack of availability of debt financing. As of December 31, 2021, our borrowings and other liabilities were approximately 54% of both the cost (before deducting depreciation and other noncash reserves) and book value (before deducting depreciation) of our tangible assets.
We also expect to use our capital resources to make certain payments to our advisor. We currently make payments to our advisor in connection with the acquisition of investments, the management of our investments and costs incurred by our advisor in providing services to us. We also pay fees to our advisor in connection with the disposition of investments. We reimburse our advisor and dealer manager for certain stockholder services. In addition, our advisor is entitled to an incentive fee upon achieving certain performance goals.
Among the fees payable to our advisor is an asset management fee. With respect to investments in real property, the asset management fee is a monthly fee equal to one-twelfth of 0.75% of the amount paid or allocated to acquire the investment, plus the cost of any subsequent development, construction or improvements to the property. This amount includes any portion of the investment that was debt financed and is inclusive of acquisition expenses related thereto (but excludes acquisition fees paid or payable to our advisor). In the case of investments made through joint ventures, the asset management fee is determined based on our proportionate share of the underlying investment (but excluding acquisition fees paid to our advisor). With respect to investments in loans and any investments other than real property, the asset management fee is a monthly fee calculated, each month, as one-twelfth of 0.75% of the lesser of (i) the amount actually paid or allocated to acquire or fund the loan or other investment (which amount includes any portion of the investment that was debt financed and is inclusive of acquisition or origination expenses related thereto but is exclusive of acquisition or origination fees paid or payable to our advisor) and (ii) the outstanding principal amount of such loan or other investment, plus the acquisition or origination expenses related to the acquisition or funding of such investment (excluding acquisition or origination fees paid or payable to our advisor), as of the time of calculation. We currently do not pay asset management fees to our advisor on our investment in units of the SREIT.
Pursuant to the advisory agreement, with respect to asset management fees accruing from March 1, 2014, our advisor agreed to defer, without interest, our obligation to pay asset management fees for any month in which our modified funds from operations (“MFFO”) for such month, as such term is defined in the practice guideline issued by the IPA in November 2010 and interpreted by us, excluding asset management fees, does not exceed the amount of distributions declared by us for record dates of that month. We remain obligated to pay our advisor an asset management fee in any month in which our MFFO, excluding asset management fees, for such month exceeds the amount of distributions declared for the record dates of that month (such excess amount, an “MFFO Surplus”); however, any amount of such asset management fee in excess of the MFFO Surplus will also be deferred under the advisory agreement. If the MFFO Surplus for any month exceeds the amount of the asset management fee payable for such month, any remaining MFFO Surplus will be applied to pay any asset management fee amounts previously deferred in accordance with the advisory agreement.
However, notwithstanding the foregoing, any and all deferred asset management fees that are unpaid will become immediately due and payable at such time as our stockholders have received, together as a collective group, aggregate distributions (including distributions that may constitute a return of capital for federal income tax purposes) sufficient to provide (i) an 8% per year cumulative, noncompounded return on net invested capital (the “Stockholders’ 8% Return”) and (ii) a return of their net invested capital, or the amount calculated by multiplying the total number of shares purchased by stockholders by the issue price, reduced by any amounts to repurchase shares pursuant to our share redemption program. The Stockholders’ 8% Return is not based on the return provided to any individual stockholder. Accordingly, it is not necessary for each of our stockholders to have received any minimum return in order for our advisor to receive deferred asset management fees.
As of December 31, 2021, we had accrued $8.1 million of asset management fees, of which $6.4 million was deferred as of December 31, 2021, pursuant to the provision for deferral of asset management fees under the Advisory Agreement. The amount of asset management fees deferred, if any, will vary on a month-to-month basis and the total amount of asset management fees deferred as well as the timing of the deferrals and repayments are difficult to predict as they will depend on the amount of and terms of the debt we use to acquire assets, the level of operating cash flow generated by our real estate investments and other factors. In addition, deferrals and repayments may occur in the same period, and it is possible that there could be additional deferrals in the future.
On September 27, 2021, we and our advisor renewed the advisory agreement. The advisory agreement has a one-year term but may be renewed for an unlimited number of successive one-year periods upon the mutual consent of our advisor and our conflicts committee.
If we convert to an NAV REIT, we would implement a revised advisory fee structure. See Part I, Item 1A, “Risk Factors - Risks of the Proposed NAV REIT Conversion” and Part III, Item 13, “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director Independence - Report of the Conflicts Committee - Certain Transactions with Related Persons.”
Participation Fee Liability and Potential Change in Fee Structure
Pursuant to our advisory agreement currently in effect with our advisor, our advisor is due a subordinated participation in our net cash flows (the “Subordinated Participation in Net Cash Flows”) upon meeting certain performance goals. After our stockholders have received, together as a collective group, aggregate distributions (including distributions that may constitute a return of capital for federal income tax purposes) sufficient to provide (i) a return of their net invested capital, or the amount calculated by multiplying the total number of shares purchased by stockholders by the issue price, reduced by any amounts to repurchase shares pursuant to our share redemption program, and (ii) an 8.0% per year cumulative, noncompounded return on such net invested capital, our advisor is entitled to receive 15.0% of our net cash flows, whether from continuing operations, net sale proceeds or otherwise. Net sales proceeds means the net cash proceeds realized by us after deduction of all expenses incurred in connection with a sale, including disposition fees paid to our advisor. The 8.0% per year cumulative, noncompounded return on net invested capital is calculated on a daily basis. In making this calculation, the net invested capital is reduced to the extent distributions in excess of a cumulative, noncompounded, annual return of 8.0% are paid (from whatever source), except to the extent such distributions would be required to supplement prior distributions paid in order to achieve a cumulative, noncompounded, annual return of 8.0% (invested capital is only reduced as described in this sentence; it is not reduced simply because a distribution constitutes a return of capital for federal income tax purposes). The 8.0% per year cumulative, noncompounded return is not based on the return provided to any individual stockholder. Accordingly, it is not necessary for each of our stockholders to have received any minimum return in order for our advisor to participate in our net cash flows. In fact, if our advisor is entitled to participate in our net cash flows, the returns of our stockholders will differ, and some may be less than an 8.0% per year cumulative, noncompounded return. This fee is payable only if we are not listed on an exchange.
On January 9, 2020, we filed a definitive proxy statement with the SEC in connection with the annual meeting of stockholders to vote on, among other proposals, two proposals related to our pursuit of conversion to an NAV REIT. On May 7, 2020 at our annual meeting of stockholders, our stockholders approved the proposal to accelerate the payment of incentive compensation to our advisor, upon our conversion to an NAV REIT. If we convert to an NAV REIT, the proposed acceleration of the payment of incentive compensation to our advisor remains subject to further approval of the conflicts committee, after the proposed amount of the accelerated payment of the incentive fee has been determined. In connection with the determination of the November 1, 2021 estimated value per share of our common stock, our advisor determined that there would be no liability related to the Subordinated Participation in Net Cash Flows at that time, based on a hypothetical liquidation of the assets and liabilities at their estimated fair values, after considering the impact of any potential closing costs and fees related to the disposition of real estate properties; however, changes to the fair values of assets and liabilities could have a material impact to the incentive fee calculation.
Our conflicts committee and our board of directors continue to evaluate various alternatives available to us, including whether or not to convert to an “NAV REIT.” Our conflicts committee and board of directors remain focused on providing stable distributions and enhanced liquidity to stockholders. In the near term, while our conflicts committee and board of directors explore alternatives available to us, we may market certain of our assets for sale. Based on our assessment of alternatives available to us, market conditions and our further assessment of our capital raising prospects, our conflicts committee and board of directors may conclude that it would be in the best interest of our stockholders to (i) convert to an “NAV REIT,” (ii) continue to operate as a going concern under our current business plan, or (iii) adopt a plan of liquidation that would involve the sale of our remaining assets (in which event such plan would be presented to stockholders for approval). There is no assurance that any alternative being considered by our board of directors will provide a return to stockholders that equals or exceeds our estimated value per share as of November 1, 2021, and although we remain focused on providing enhanced liquidity to stockholders while maximizing returns to stockholders, we can provide no assurances in this regard. We also can provide no assurances as to whether or when any alternative being considered by our board of directors will be consummated. See Part I, Item 1A, “Risk Factors” and Part III, Item 13, “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director Independence - Report of the Conflicts Committee - Certain Transactions with Related Persons.”
Debt Obligations
The following is a summary of our debt obligations as of December 31, 2021 (in thousands):
Payments Due During the Years Ended December 31,
Debt Obligations Total 2022 2023-2024 2025-2026
Outstanding debt obligations (1)
$ 1,472,290 $ 1,013 $ 1,471,277 $ -
Interest payments on outstanding debt obligations (2) (4)
54,555 29,500 25,055 -
Interest payments on interest rate swaps (3) (4)
26,523 16,390 10,133 -
_____________________
(1) Amounts include principal payments only based on maturity dates as of December 31, 2021; subject to certain conditions, the maturity dates of certain loans may be extended beyond what is shown above.
(2) Projected interest payments are based on the outstanding principal amounts, maturity dates and interest rates in effect as of December 31, 2021 (consisting of the contractual interest rate and using interest rate indices as of December 31, 2021, where applicable).
(3) Projected interest payments on interest rate swaps are calculated based on the notional amount, effective term of the swap contract, and fixed rate net of the swapped floating rate in effect as of December 31, 2021.
(4) We incurred interest expense of $48.6 million, excluding amortization of deferred financing costs totaling $4.0 million and unrealized gains on derivative instruments of $23.3 million during the year ended December 31, 2021.
Capital Expenditures Obligations
As of December 31, 2021, we have capital expenditure obligations of $111.3 million, the majority of which is expected to be spent in the next twelve months and of which $30.1 million has already been accrued and included in accounts payable and accrued liabilities on our consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2021. This amount includes unpaid contractual obligations for building improvements and unpaid portions of tenant improvement allowances which were granted pursuant to lease agreements executed as of December 31, 2021, including amounts that may be classified as lease incentives pursuant to GAAP. In certain cases, tenants may have discretion when to utilize their tenant allowances and may delay the start of projects or tenants control the construction of their projects and may not submit timely requests for reimbursement or there are general construction delays, all of which could extend the timing of payment for a portion of these capital expenditure obligations beyond twelve months.
Results of Operations
In this section, we discuss the results of our operations for the year ended December 31, 2021 compared to the year ended December 31, 2020. For a discussion of the year ended December 31, 2020 compared to the year ended December 31, 2019, please refer to Item 7 of Part II, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020, which was filed with the SEC on March 12, 2021 and which specific discussion is incorporated herein by reference.
As of December 31, 2020, we owned 18 office properties, one mixed-use office/retail property and an investment in the equity securities of the SREIT, which was accounted for as an investment in an unconsolidated entity under the equity method of accounting at that time. Subsequent to December 31, 2020, we sold two office properties and through our indirect wholly owned subsidiary (“REIT Properties III”), sold 73,720,000 of our units in the SREIT, reducing REIT Properties III’s ownership in the SREIT to 18.5%. As of December 31, 2021, we owned 16 office properties, one mixed-use office/retail property and an investment in the equity securities of the SREIT. As a result of our reduced ownership in the SREIT, our investment in the equity securities of the SREIT is now presented at fair value at each reporting date based on the closing price of the SREIT units on the SGX-ST on that date. Therefore, the results of operations presented for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 are not directly comparable.
Comparison of the year ended December 31, 2021 versus the year ended December 31, 2020
The following table provides summary information about our results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 (dollar amounts in thousands):
For the Years Ended
December 31, Increase
(Decrease) Percentage
Change $ Changes Due to
Dispositions of Properties, Sale of Real Estate Equity Securities and Loan Pay-off (1)
$ Change Due
to Properties Held
Throughout Both
Periods (2)
2021 2020
Rental income $ 280,144 $ 282,527 $ (2,383) (1) % $ (6,239) $ 3,856
Interest income from real estate loan receivable - 5,666 (5,666) (100) % (5,666) -
Other operating income 16,617 18,725 (2,108) (11) % (1,018) (1,090)
Operating, maintenance and management 68,806 71,470 (2,664) (4) % (3,971) 1,307
Real estate taxes and insurance 57,687 57,234 453 1 % (2,040) 2,493
Asset management fees to affiliate 19,832 20,990 (1,158) (6) % (1,644) 486
General and administrative expenses 6,116 6,600 (484) (7) % n/a n/a
Depreciation and amortization 110,984 110,806 178 - % (3,675) 3,853
Interest expense 29,301 81,139 (51,838) (64) % (1,782) (50,056)
Impairment charges on real estate - 19,896 (19,896) (100) % - (19,896)
Other interest income 52 72 (20) (28) % n/a n/a
Equity in income (loss) of an unconsolidated entity 8,698 (465) 9,163 (1,971) % 9,163 -
Loss from extinguishment of debt (214) (199) (15) 8 % (166) 151
Unrealized gain on real estate equity securities 16,765 - 16,765 100 % 16,765 -
Gain on sale of real estate, net 114,321 49,457 64,864 131 % 64,864 -
_____________________
(1) Represents the dollar amount increase (decrease) for the year ended December 31, 2021 compared to the year ended December 31, 2020 related to dispositions of properties, the sale of real estate equity securities and the pay off of a real estate loan on or after January 1, 2020.
(2) Represents the dollar amount increase (decrease) for the year ended December 31, 2021 compared to the year ended December 31, 2020 related to real estate investments owned by us throughout both periods presented.
Rental income from our real estate properties decreased from $282.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2020 to $280.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2021. The decrease in rental income was primarily due to the dispositions of real estate properties subsequent to January 1, 2020, partially offset by an increase in rental income related to lease commencements and early renewals of leases and lease termination income received during the year ended December 31, 2021 with respect to properties held throughout both periods. We expect rental income to decrease in future periods to the extent we dispose of properties, to vary based on occupancy rates and rental rates of our real estate investments and uncertainty and business disruptions or recoveries as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic and to increase due to tenant reimbursements related to operating expenses as physical occupancy increases as employees return to the office. See “Market Outlook - Real Estate and Real Estate Finance Markets - COVID-19 Pandemic and Portfolio Outlook” for a discussion on the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on our business.
Interest income from our real estate loan receivable, recognized using the interest method, was $5.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2020. On May 7, 2020, in connection with the sale of Hardware Village, we, through an indirect wholly owned subsidiary, provided seller financing and entered into a promissory note with the buyer. The promissory note was paid off in full on December 11, 2020. We did not own any real estate loans receivable during the year ended December 31, 2021.
Other operating income decreased from $18.7 million during the year ended December 31, 2020 to $16.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2021. The decrease in other operating income was primarily due to a decrease in parking revenues for properties held throughout both periods and the disposition of Anchor Centre in January 2021. We expect other operating income to vary in future periods based on occupancy rates and parking rates at our real estate properties, and business disruptions or recoveries as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic and to decrease to the extent we dispose of properties.
Operating, maintenance and management costs decreased from $71.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2020 to $68.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2021. The decrease in operating, maintenance and management costs was primarily due to the dispositions of real estate properties subsequent to January 1, 2020, partially offset by an overall increase in operating costs as a result of an increase in physical occupancy at properties held throughout both periods. We expect operating, maintenance and management costs to increase in future periods as a result of general inflation and as physical occupancy increases as employees return to the office and to decrease to the extent we dispose of additional properties.
Real estate taxes and insurance increased slightly from $57.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2020 to $57.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2021. The increase in real estate taxes and insurance was primarily due to a net increase in real estate taxes due to higher property tax assessments for real estate properties held throughout both periods, offset by a decrease due to the dispositions of real estate properties subsequent to January 1, 2020. We expect real estate taxes and insurance to increase in future periods as a result of general inflation and general increases due to future property tax reassessments for properties that we continue to own and to decrease to the extent we dispose of properties.
Asset management fees with respect to our real estate investments decreased from $21.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2020 to $19.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2021, primarily due to the dispositions of real estate properties subsequent to January 1, 2020 and the payoff of our real estate loan receivable in December 2020. We expect asset management fees to increase in future periods as a result of any improvements we make to our properties and to decrease to the extent we dispose of additional properties. As of December 31, 2021, there were $8.1 million of accrued asset management fees, of which $6.4 million was deferred as of December 31, 2021. For a discussion of accrued and deferred asset management fees, see “- Liquidity and Capital Resources” herein.
General and administrative expenses decreased from $6.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2020 to $6.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2021, primarily due to a receivable as of December 31, 2021 related to estimated amounts charged to us by certain vendors for services for which we believe we were either overcharged or which were never performed, as discussed under Part II, Item 9B, “Other Information” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, offset by appraisal fees related to the update of our estimated value per share in May 2021, and an increase in legal fees and proxy costs incurred during the year ended December 31, 2021. General and administrative costs consisted primarily of portfolio legal fees, board of directors fees, third party transfer agent fees and errors and omissions insurance. We expect general and administrative expenses to vary in future periods.
Depreciation and amortization increased slightly from $110.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2020 to $111.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2021, primarily due to an increase in capital improvements at properties held throughout both periods, offset by a decrease as a result of the sale of Anchor Centre in January 2021 and Domain Gateway in November 2021. We expect depreciation and amortization to increase in future periods as a result of additional capital improvements, offset by a decrease in amortization related to fully amortized tenant origination and absorption costs and to the extent we dispose of properties.
Interest expense decreased from $81.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2020 to $29.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2021. Included in interest expense was (i) $37.7 million and $30.6 million of interest expense payments for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2021, respectively, (ii) the amortization of deferred financing costs of $4.3 million and $4.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2021, respectively, and (iii) interest expense (including gains and losses) incurred as a result of our derivative instruments which increased interest expense by $39.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2020, and decreased interest expense by $5.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2021. The decrease in interest expense was primarily due to changes in fair values with respect to our interest rate swaps that are not accounted for as cash flow hedges and a lower 30-day LIBOR during the year ended December 31, 2021 and its impact on interest expense related to our variable rate debt, partially offset by an increase in interest expense due to additional borrowings on our existing credit facilities, which was used to partially fund the Self-Tender. In general, we expect interest expense to vary based on fair value changes with respect to our interest rate swaps that are not accounted for as cash flow hedges, fluctuations in interest rates (for our variable rate debt) and our level of future borrowings.
During the year ended December 31, 2020, we recorded a non-cash impairment charge of $19.9 million to write down the carrying value of an office/retail property to its estimated fair value as a result of changes in cash flow estimates, including a change to the anticipated hold period of the property, which triggered the future estimated undiscounted cash flows to be lower than the net carrying value of the property. The decrease in cash flow projections was primarily due to the continued lack of demand for the property’s retail component resulting in longer than estimated lease-up periods and lower projected rental rates, mostly due to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. We did not record any impairment charges on our real estate properties during the year ended December 31, 2021.
During the period from January 1, 2021 through November 8, 2021, we recorded equity in income from an unconsolidated entity of $8.7 million, related to our investment in the SREIT. Equity in income of an unconsolidated entity during the period from January 1, 2021 through November 8, 2021 included a gain of $3.1 million related to our sale of 73,720,000 units in the SREIT on November 9, 2021 and a gain of $1.1 million to reflect the net effect to our investment as a result of the net proceeds raised by the SREIT in a private offering in July 2021. During the year ended December 31, 2020, we recorded equity in loss of an unconsolidated entity of $0.5 million related to our investment in the SREIT. Equity in loss of an unconsolidated entity for the year ended December 31, 2020 included $2.6 million related to our share of the net losses from the SREIT offset by a gain of $2.1 million to reflect the net effect to our investment as a result of the net proceeds raised by the SREIT in a private offering in February 2020. Effective November 9, 2021, based on our 18.5% ownership interest in the SREIT, we do not exercise significant influence over the operations, financial policies and decision making with respect to the SREIT. Accordingly, our investment in the units of the SREIT represents an investment in marketable securities and therefore is presented at fair value as of December 31, 2021, based on the closing price of the SREIT units on the SGX-ST on that date.
During the period from November 9, 2021 through December 31, 2021, we recorded an unrealized gain on real estate equity securities of $16.8 million based on the difference in the aggregate carrying value of our 215,841,899 units of the SREIT on November 9, 2021 and the aggregate fair value of these units as of December 31, 2021, based on the closing price of the SREIT units on the SGX-ST on that date.
We recognized a gain on sale of real estate of $114.3 million during the year ended December 31, 2021 related to the dispositions of Anchor Centre in January 2021 and Domain Gateway in November 2021. During the year ended December 31, 2020, we recognized a gain on sale of real estate of $49.5 million related to the disposition of Hardware Village.
Funds from Operations and Modified Funds from Operations
We believe that funds from operations (“FFO”) is a beneficial indicator of the performance of an equity REIT. We compute FFO in accordance with the current National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (“NAREIT”) definition. FFO represents net income, excluding gains and losses from sales of operating real estate assets (which can vary among owners of identical assets in similar conditions based on historical cost accounting and useful-life estimates), gains and losses from change in control, impairment losses on real estate assets, depreciation and amortization of real estate assets, and adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures. In addition, we elected the option to exclude mark-to-market changes in value recognized on real estate equity securities in the calculation of FFO. We believe FFO facilitates comparisons of operating performance between periods and among other REITs. However, our computation of FFO may not be comparable to other REITs that do not define FFO in accordance with the NAREIT definition or that interpret the current NAREIT definition differently than we do. Our management believes that historical cost accounting for real estate assets in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) implicitly assumes that the value of real estate assets diminishes predictably over time. Since real estate values have historically risen or fallen with market conditions, many industry investors and analysts have considered the presentation of operating results for real estate companies that use historical cost accounting to be insufficient by themselves. As a result, we believe that the use of FFO, together with the required GAAP presentations, provides a more complete understanding of our performance relative to our competitors and provides a more informed and appropriate basis on which to make decisions involving operating, financing, and investing activities.
Changes in accounting rules have resulted in a substantial increase in the number of non-operating and non-cash items included in the calculation of FFO. As a result, our management also uses MFFO as an indicator of our ongoing performance as well as our dividend sustainability. MFFO excludes from FFO: acquisition fees and expenses (to the extent that such fees and expenses have been recorded as operating expenses); adjustments related to contingent purchase price obligations; amounts relating to straight-line rents and amortization of above and below market intangible lease assets and liabilities; accretion of discounts and amortization of premiums on debt investments; amortization of closing costs relating to debt investments; impairments of real estate-related investments; mark-to-market adjustments included in net income; and gains or losses included in net income for the extinguishment or sale of debt or hedges. We compute MFFO in accordance with the definition of MFFO included in the practice guideline issued by the IPA in November 2010 as interpreted by management. Our computation of MFFO may not be comparable to other REITs that do not compute MFFO in accordance with the current IPA definition or that interpret the current IPA definition differently than we do.
We believe that MFFO is helpful as a measure of ongoing operating performance because it excludes costs that management considers more reflective of investing activities and other non-operating items included in FFO. Management believes that excluding acquisition fees and expenses (to the extent that such fees and expenses have been recorded as operating expenses) from MFFO provides investors with supplemental performance information that is consistent with management’s analysis of the operating performance of the portfolio over time. MFFO also excludes non-cash items such as straight-line rental revenue. Additionally, we believe that MFFO provides investors with supplemental performance information that is consistent with the performance indicators and analysis used by management, in addition to net income and cash flows from operating activities as defined by GAAP, to evaluate the sustainability of our operating performance. MFFO provides comparability in evaluating the operating performance of our portfolio with other non-traded REITs. MFFO, or an equivalent measure, is routinely reported by non-traded REITs, and we believe often used by analysts and investors for comparison purposes.
FFO and MFFO are non-GAAP financial measures and do not represent net income as defined by GAAP. Net income as defined by GAAP is the most relevant measure in determining our operating performance because FFO and MFFO include adjustments that investors may deem subjective, such as adding back expenses such as depreciation and amortization and the other items described above. Accordingly, FFO and MFFO should not be considered as alternatives to net income as an indicator of our current and historical operating performance. In addition, FFO and MFFO do not represent cash flows from operating activities determined in accordance with GAAP and should not be considered an indication of our liquidity. We believe FFO and MFFO, in addition to net income and cash flows from operating activities as defined by GAAP, are meaningful supplemental performance measures; however, neither FFO nor MFFO reflects adjustments for the operations of properties sold or under contract to sale during the periods presented. During periods of significant disposition activity, FFO and MFFO are much more limited measures of future performance and dividend sustainability. In connection with our presentation of FFO and MFFO, we are providing information related to the proportion of MFFO related to properties sold during the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019, and a real estate loan receivable paid off in full on December 11, 2020.
Although MFFO includes other adjustments, the exclusion of adjustments for straight-line rent, the amortization of above- and below-market leases, amortization of discounts and closing costs, unrealized (gains) losses on derivative instruments and loss from extinguishment of debt are the most significant adjustments for the periods presented. We have excluded these items based on the following economic considerations:
•Adjustments for straight-line rent. These are adjustments to rental revenue as required by GAAP to recognize contractual lease payments on a straight-line basis over the life of the respective lease. We have excluded these adjustments in our calculation of MFFO to more appropriately reflect the current economic impact of our in-place leases, while also providing investors with a useful supplemental metric that addresses core operating performance by removing rent we expect to receive in a future period or rent that was received in a prior period;
•Amortization of above- and below-market leases. Similar to depreciation and amortization of real estate assets and lease related costs that are excluded from FFO, GAAP implicitly assumes that the value of intangible lease assets and liabilities diminishes predictably over time and requires that these charges be recognized currently in revenue. Since market lease rates in the aggregate have historically risen or fallen with local market conditions, management believes that by excluding these charges, MFFO provides useful supplemental information on the realized economics of the real estate;
•Amortization of discounts and closing costs. Discounts and closing costs related to debt investments are amortized over the term of the loan as an adjustment to interest income. This application results in income recognition that is different than the underlying contractual terms of the debt investments. We have excluded the amortization of discounts and closing costs related to our debt investments in our calculation of MFFO to more appropriately reflect the economic impact of our debt investments, as discounts will not be economically recognized until the loan is repaid and closing costs are essentially the same as acquisition fees and expenses on real estate. We believe excluding these items provides investors with a useful supplemental metric that directly addresses core operating performance;
•Unrealized (gains) losses on derivative instruments. These adjustments include unrealized (gains) losses from mark-to-market adjustments on interest rate swaps. The change in fair value of interest rate swaps not designated as a hedge are non-cash adjustments recognized directly in earnings and are included in interest expense. We have excluded these adjustments in our calculation of MFFO to more appropriately reflect the economic impact of our interest rate swap agreements; and
•Loss from extinguishment of debt. A loss from extinguishment of debt, which includes prepayment fees related to the extinguishment of debt, represents the difference between the carrying value of any consideration transferred to the lender in return for the extinguishment of a debt and the net carrying value of the debt at the time of settlement. We have excluded the loss from extinguishment of debt in our calculation of MFFO because these losses do not impact the current operating performance of our investments and do not provide an indication of future operating performance.
Our calculation of FFO, which we believe is consistent with the calculation of FFO as defined by NAREIT, is presented in the following table, along with our calculation of MFFO, for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019, respectively (in thousands). No conclusions or comparisons should be made from the presentation of these periods.
For the Years Ended December 31,
2021 2020 2019
Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders $ 143,657 $ (18,497) $ 261,211
Depreciation of real estate assets 86,025 83,323 94,546
Amortization of lease-related costs 24,959 27,483 46,556
Impairment charges on real estate - 19,896 8,706
Unrealized gain on real estate equity securities (16,765) - -
Gain on sale of real estate, net (114,321) (49,457) (327,211)
Adjustments for noncontrolling interests - consolidated entity (1)
- 6,144 (28)
Adjustment for investment in an unconsolidated entity (2)
12,046 16,040 8,571
FFO attributable to common stockholders (3) (4) (5)
135,601 84,932 92,351
Straight-line rent and amortization of above- and below-market leases, net (5,304) (7,371) (9,739)
Amortization of discount and closing costs on real estate loan receivable - (2,415) -
Loss from extinguishment of debt 214 199 2,229
Unrealized (gains) losses on derivative instruments (23,283) 25,165 35,664
Adjustment for investment in an unconsolidated entity (2)
(3,321) 4,426 2,017
MFFO attributable to common stockholders (3) (4) (5)
$ 103,907 $ 104,936 $ 122,522
_____________________
(1) Reflects adjustments to eliminate the noncontrolling interest holder’s share of the adjustments to convert our net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders to FFO.
(2) Reflects our noncontrolling interest share of adjustments to convert our net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders to FFO and MFFO for our equity investment in an unconsolidated entity.
(3) FFO and MFFO include $1.6 million, $1.2 million, and $8.2 million of lease termination income for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019, respectively.
(4) FFO and MFFO for the year ended December 31, 2021 include a one-time $2.5 million holdover payment from a tenant related to a six-month lease extension which was received in December 2021 and will be recognized as rental income for GAAP purposes on a straight-line basis for a six-month period through May 2022.
(5) FFO and MFFO exclude our share of the SREIT’s FFO and MFFO, respectively, for the period from November 9, 2021 through December 31, 2021. On November 9, 2021, upon our sale of 73,720,000 units in the SREIT, we determined that based on our ownership interest of 18.5% of the outstanding units of the SREIT, we no longer have significant influence over the operations, financial policies and decision making with respect to the SREIT and therefore, ceased accounting for our investment in the SREIT as an equity method investment on that date. Accordingly, effective November 9, 2021, our investment in the units of the SREIT represents an investment in marketable securities and is therefore presented at fair value at each reporting date based on the closing price of the SREIT units on the SGX-ST on that date. As a result, our share of the SREIT’s FFO and MFFO will no longer be recorded on a monthly basis and we will only recognize FFO and MFFO related our investment in the SREIT as the SREIT declares future dividends based on eligible units as of the ex-dividend date consistent with GAAP.
Our calculation of MFFO above includes amounts related to the operations of two office properties sold on January 19, 2021 and November 2, 2021, respectively, the operations of the multifamily apartment complex held by the Hardware Village joint venture that was sold on May 7, 2020, interest income from our real estate loan receivable paid off in full on December 11, 2020 and the operations of the Singapore Portfolio sold on July 18, 2019. Please refer to the table below with respect to the proportion of MFFO related to the real estate properties sold during the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019, and the real estate loan receivable paid off (in thousands).
For the Years Ended December 31,
2021 2020 2019
MFFO by component:
Assets held for investment $ 99,320 $ 97,892 $ 97,406
Real estate properties sold 4,587 4,340 25,116
Real estate loan receivable paid off - 2,704 -
MFFO $ 103,907 $ 104,936 $ 122,522
FFO and MFFO may also be used to fund all or a portion of certain capitalizable items that are excluded from FFO and MFFO, such as tenant improvements, building improvements and deferred leasing costs.
Distributions
Distributions declared, distributions paid and cash flow from operating activities were as follows during 2021 (in thousands, except per share amounts):
Distributions
Declared Distributions
Declared
Per Share (1)
Distributions Paid (1) (2)
Cash Flow
from Operating
Activities
Period Cash Reinvested Total
First Quarter 2021 $ 27,640 $ 0.149 $ 16,274 $ 11,326 $ 27,600 $ 16,295
Second Quarter 2021 27,755 0.149 22,024 14,959 36,983 27,698
Third Quarter 2021 23,863 0.150 9,434 6,507 15,941 32,247
Fourth Quarter 2021 23,361 0.150 13,970 9,577 23,547 24,559
$ 102,619 $ 0.598 $ 61,702 $ 42,369 $ 104,071 $ 100,799
_____________________
(1) Assumes share was issued and outstanding on each monthly record date for distributions during the period presented. For each monthly record date for distributions during the period from January 1, 2021 through December 31, 2021, distributions were calculated at a rate of $0.04983333 per share.
(2) Distributions are generally paid on a monthly basis. Distributions for the monthly record date of a given month are paid on or about the first business day of the following month; however, we accelerated the payment of the June 2021 distributions due to the timing of the Self-Tender.
For the year ended December 31, 2021, we paid aggregate distributions of $104.1 million, including $61.7 million of distributions paid in cash and $42.4 million of distributions reinvested through our dividend reinvestment plan. Our net income attributable to common stockholders for the year ended December 31, 2021 was $143.7 million. FFO for the year ended December 31, 2021 was $135.6 million and cash flow from operating activities was $100.8 million. See the reconciliation of FFO to net income attributable to common stockholders above. We funded our total distributions paid, which includes net cash distributions and dividends reinvested by stockholders, with $83.5 million of cash flow from current operating activities, $4.2 million of cash flow from operating activities in excess of distributions paid during prior periods and $16.4 million of proceeds from the sale of real estate. For purposes of determining the source of our distributions paid, we assume first that we use cash flow from operating activities from the relevant or prior periods to fund distribution payments.
Over the long-term, we generally expect our distributions will be paid from cash flow from operating activities from current periods or prior periods (except with respect to distributions related to sales of our assets and distributions related to the sales or repayment of real estate-related investments). From time to time during our operational stage, we may not pay distributions solely from our cash flow from operating activities, in which case distributions may be paid in whole or in part from debt financing. To the extent that we pay distributions from sources other than our cash flow from operating activities, the overall return to our stockholders may be reduced. Further, our operating performance cannot be accurately predicted and may deteriorate in the future due to numerous factors, including those discussed under “Forward-Looking Statements,” “Summary Risk Factors,” Part I, Item 1A, “Risk Factors” and in this Part II, Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.” Those factors include: the future operating performance of our real estate investments in the existing real estate and financial environment; the success and economic viability of our tenants; our ability to refinance existing indebtedness at comparable terms; changes in interest rates on any variable rate debt obligations we incur; the level of participation in our dividend reinvestment plan; and the extent to which the COVID-19 pandemic impacts our operations and those of our tenants and our investment in the SREIT. In the event our FFO and/or cash flow from operating activities decrease in the future, the level of our distributions may also decrease. In addition, future distributions declared and paid may exceed FFO and/or cash flow from operating activities.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Our consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with GAAP and in conjunction with the rules and regulations of the SEC. The preparation of our financial statements requires significant management judgments, assumptions and estimates about matters that are inherently uncertain. These judgments affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and our disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities as of the dates of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting periods. With different estimates or assumptions, materially different amounts could be reported in our financial statements. Additionally, other companies may utilize different estimates that may impact the comparability of our results of operations to those of companies in similar businesses.
Revenue Recognition - Operating Leases
Real Estate
On January 1, 2019, we adopted ASU 2016-02, Leases Topic 842 including the package of practical expedients (“Topic 842”) for all leases that commenced before the effective date of January 1, 2019. Accordingly, we (i) did not reassess whether any expired or existing contracts are or contain leases, (ii) did not reassess the lease classification for any expired or existing lease, and (iii) did not reassess initial direct costs for any existing leases. We did not elect the practical expedient related to using hindsight to reevaluate the lease term. In addition, we adopted the practical expedient for land easements and did not assess whether existing or expired land easements that were not previously accounted for as leases under the lease accounting standards of Topic 840 are or contain a lease under Topic 842.
In addition, Topic 842 provides an optional transition method to allow entities to apply the new lease accounting standards at the adoption date and recognize a cumulative-effect adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings. We adopted this transition method upon our adoption of the lease accounting standards of Topic 842, which did not result in a cumulative effect adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings on January 1, 2019.
In accordance with Topic 842, tenant reimbursements for property taxes and insurance are included in the single lease component of the lease contract (the right of the lessee to use the leased space) and therefore are accounted for as variable lease payments and are recorded as rental income on our statement of operations. In addition, we adopted the practical expedient available under Topic 842, to not separate nonlease components from the associated lease component and, instead to account for those components as a single component if the nonlease components otherwise would be accounted for under the new revenue recognition standard (Topic 606) and if certain conditions are met, specifically related to tenant reimbursements for common area maintenance which would otherwise be accounted for under the revenue recognition standard. We believe the two conditions have been met for tenant reimbursements for common area maintenance as (i) the timing and pattern of transfer of the nonlease components and associated lease components are the same and (ii) the lease component would be classified as an operating lease. Accordingly, tenant reimbursements for common area maintenance are also accounted for as variable lease payments and recorded as rental income on our statement of operations.
We recognize minimum rent, including rental abatements, lease incentives and contractual fixed increases attributable to operating leases, on a straight-line basis over the term of the related leases when collectibility is probable and record amounts expected to be received in later years as deferred rent receivable. If the lease provides for tenant improvements, we determine whether the tenant improvements, for accounting purposes, are owned by the tenant or us. When we are the owner of the tenant improvements, the tenant is not considered to have taken physical possession or have control of the physical use of the leased asset until the tenant improvements are substantially completed. When the tenant is the owner of the tenant improvements, any tenant improvement allowance (including amounts that can be taken in the form of cash or a credit against the tenant’s rent) that is funded is treated as a lease incentive and amortized as a reduction of rental revenue over the lease term. Tenant improvement ownership is determined based on various factors including, but not limited to:
•whether the lease stipulates how a tenant improvement allowance may be spent;
•whether the lessee or lessor supervises the construction and bears the risk of cost overruns;
•whether the amount of a tenant improvement allowance is in excess of market rates;
•whether the tenant or landlord retains legal title to the improvements at the end of the lease term;
•whether the tenant improvements are unique to the tenant or general purpose in nature; and
•whether the tenant improvements are expected to have any residual value at the end of the lease.
We leased apartment units under operating leases with terms generally of one year or less. Generally, credit investigations were performed for prospective residents and security deposits were obtained. We recognized rental revenue, net of concessions, on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease, when collectibility was determined to be probable.
In accordance with Topic 842, we make a determination of whether the collectibility of the lease payments in an operating lease is probable. If we determine the lease payments are not probable of collection, we would fully reserve for any contractual lease payments, deferred rent receivable, and variable lease payments and would recognize rental income only if cash is received. These changes to our collectibility assessment are reflected as an adjustment to rental income. We make estimates of the collectability of the lease payments which requires significant judgment by management. We consider payment history, current credit status, the tenant’s financial condition, security deposits, letters of credit, lease guarantees and current market conditions that may impact the tenant’s ability to make payments in accordance with its lease agreements, including the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the tenant’s business, in making the determination.
We, as a lessor, record costs to negotiate or arrange a lease that would have been incurred regardless of whether the lease was obtained, such as legal costs incurred to negotiate an operating lease, as an expense and classify such costs as operating, maintenance, and management expense on our consolidated statement of operations, as these costs are no longer capitalizable under the definition of initial direct costs under Topic 842.
Sales of Real Estate
We follow the guidance of ASC 610-20, Other Income - Gains and Losses from the Derecognition of Nonfinancial Assets (“ASC 610-20”), which applies to sales or transfers to noncustomers of nonfinancial assets or in substance nonfinancial assets that do not meet the definition of a business. Generally, our sales of real estate would be considered a sale of a nonfinancial asset as defined by ASC 610-20.
ASC 610-20 refers to the revenue recognition principles under ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606). Under ASC 610-20, if we determine we do not have a controlling financial interest in the entity that holds the asset and the arrangement meets the criteria to be accounted for as a contract, we would derecognize the asset and recognize a gain or loss on the sale of the real estate when control of the underlying asset transfers to the buyer. The application of these criteria can be complex and incorrect assumptions on collectability of the transaction price or transfer of control can result in the improper recognition of the gain or loss from sales of real estate during the period.
Real Estate Loan Receivable
Interest income on our real estate loan receivable was recognized on an accrual basis over the life of the investment using the interest method. Direct loan origination fees and origination or acquisition costs, as well as premiums or discounts, were amortized over the term of the loan as an adjustment to interest income.
Real Estate Equity Securities
Dividend income from real estate equity securities is recognized on an accrual basis based on eligible units as of the ex-dividend date.
Real Estate
Depreciation and Amortization
Real estate costs related to the acquisition and improvement of properties are capitalized and depreciated over the expected useful life of the asset on a straight-line basis. Repair and maintenance costs are charged to expense as incurred and significant replacements and betterments are capitalized. Repair and maintenance costs include all costs that do not extend the useful life of the real estate asset. We consider the period of future benefit of an asset to determine its appropriate useful life. Expenditures for tenant improvements are capitalized and amortized over the shorter of the tenant’s lease term or expected useful life. We anticipate the estimated useful lives of our assets by class to be generally as follows:
Land N/A
Buildings 25-40 years
Building improvements 10-25 years
Tenant improvements Shorter of lease term or expected useful life
Tenant origination and absorption costs Remaining term of related leases, including below-market renewal periods
Real Estate Acquisition Valuation
We record the acquisition of income-producing real estate or real estate that will be used for the production of income as a business combination or an asset acquisition. If substantially all of the fair value of the gross assets acquired are concentrated in a single identifiable asset or group of similar identifiable assets, then the set is not a business. For purposes of this test, land and buildings can be combined along with the intangible assets for any in-place leases and accordingly, most acquisitions of investment properties would not meet the definition of a business and would be accounted for as an asset acquisition. To be considered a business, a set must include an input and a substantive process that together significantly contributes to the ability to create an output. All assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination are measured at their acquisition-date fair values. For asset acquisitions, the cost of the acquisition is allocated to individual assets and liabilities on a relative fair value basis. Acquisition costs associated with business combinations are expensed as incurred. Acquisition costs associated with asset acquisitions are capitalized.
We assess the acquisition date fair values of all tangible assets, identifiable intangibles and assumed liabilities using methods similar to those used by independent appraisers, generally utilizing a discounted cash flow analysis that applies appropriate discount and/or capitalization rates and available market information. Estimates of future cash flows are based on a number of factors, including historical operating results, known and anticipated trends, and market and economic conditions. The fair value of tangible assets of an acquired property considers the value of the property as if it were vacant.
We record above-market and below-market in-place lease values for acquired properties based on the present value (using a discount rate that reflects the risks associated with the leases acquired) of the difference between (i) the contractual amounts to be paid pursuant to the in-place leases and (ii) management’s estimate of fair market lease rates for the corresponding in-place leases, measured over a period equal to the remaining non-cancelable term of above-market in-place leases and for the initial term plus any extended term for any leases with below-market renewal options. We amortize any recorded above-market or below-market lease values as a reduction or increase, respectively, to rental income over the remaining non-cancelable terms of the respective lease, including any below-market renewal periods.
We estimate the value of tenant origination and absorption costs by considering the estimated carrying costs during hypothetical expected lease-up periods, considering current market conditions. In estimating carrying costs, we include real estate taxes, insurance and other operating expenses and estimates of lost rentals at market rates during the expected lease-up periods.
We amortize the value of tenant origination and absorption costs to depreciation and amortization expense over the remaining non-cancelable term of the leases.
Estimates of the fair values of the tangible assets, identifiable intangibles and assumed liabilities require us to make significant assumptions to estimate market lease rates, property-operating expenses, carrying costs during lease-up periods, discount rates, market absorption periods, and the number of years the property will be held for investment. The use of inappropriate assumptions would result in an incorrect valuation of our acquired tangible assets, identifiable intangibles and assumed liabilities, which would impact the amount of our net income.
Subsequent to the acquisition of a property, we may incur and capitalize costs necessary to get the property ready for its intended use. During that time, certain costs such as legal fees, real estate taxes and insurance and financing costs are also capitalized.
Impairment of Real Estate and Related Intangible Assets and Liabilities
We continually monitor events and changes in circumstances that could indicate that the carrying amounts of our real estate and related intangible assets and liabilities may not be recoverable or realized. When indicators of potential impairment suggest that the carrying value of real estate and related intangible assets and liabilities may not be recoverable, we assess the recoverability by estimating whether we will recover the carrying value of the real estate and related intangible assets and liabilities through its undiscounted future cash flows and its eventual disposition. If, based on this analysis, we do not believe that we will be able to recover the carrying value of the real estate and related intangible assets and liabilities, we would record an impairment loss to the extent that the carrying value exceeds the estimated fair value of the real estate and related intangible assets and liabilities.
Projecting future cash flows involves estimating expected future operating income and expenses related to the real estate and its related intangible assets and liabilities as well as market and other trends. Using inappropriate assumptions to estimate cash flows or the expected hold period until the eventual disposition could result in incorrect conclusions on recoverability and incorrect fair values of the real estate and its related intangible assets and liabilities and could result in the overstatement of the carrying values of our real estate and related intangible assets and liabilities and an overstatement of our net income.
Investments in Unconsolidated Joint Ventures
We account for investments in joint ventures or entities over which we may exercise significant influence, but do not control, and for investments in joint ventures that qualify as variable interest entities of which we are not the primary beneficiary using the equity method of accounting. Under the equity method, the investment is initially recorded at cost and subsequently adjusted to reflect additional contributions or distributions and our proportionate share of equity in the entity’s income (loss). We recognize our proportionate share of the ongoing income or loss of the unconsolidated entity as equity in income (loss) of unconsolidated entities on the consolidated statements of operations. In addition, we account for any share issuances by the unconsolidated entity as if we sold a proportionate share of our investment. Any gain or loss as a result of the unconsolidated entity’s share issuance is recognized in equity in income (loss) of unconsolidated entities on the consolidated statement of operations. On a quarterly basis, we evaluate our investment in an unconsolidated entity for other-than-temporary impairments. To evaluate for other-than-temporary impairments, we must determine if we have the ability to recover the carrying amount of our investment, which requires us to make assumptions about whether the unconsolidated entity can sustain earnings and requires us to estimate projected cash flows from our unconsolidated entity, which may include the amount we expect to realize upon the sale of our investment. Using inappropriate assumptions to estimate projected cash flows or sales prices could result in incorrect conclusions on recoverability.
Real Estate Equity Securities
Real estate equity securities are carried at fair value based on quoted market prices for the security. Unrealized gains and losses on real estate equity securities are recognized in earnings.
Derivative Instruments
We enter into derivative instruments for risk management purposes to hedge our exposure to cash flow variability caused by changing interest rates on our variable rate notes payable. We record these derivative instruments at fair value on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. The changes in fair value for derivative instruments that are not designated as a hedge or that do not meet the hedge accounting criteria are recorded as gain or loss on derivative instruments and included in interest expense as presented in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
The calculation of the fair value of derivative instruments is complex and different inputs used in the model can result in significant changes to the fair value of derivative instruments and the related gain or loss on derivative instruments included as interest expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. The valuation of our derivative instruments is based on a proprietary model using the contractual terms of the derivatives, including the period to maturity, as well as observable market-based inputs, including interest rate curves and volatility. The fair values of interest rate swaps are estimated using the market standard methodology of netting the discounted fixed cash payments and the discounted expected variable cash receipts. The variable cash receipts are based on an expectation of interest rates (forward curves) derived from observable market interest rate curves. In addition, credit valuation adjustments, which consider the impact of any credit risks to the contracts, are incorporated in the fair values to account for potential nonperformance risk.
Fair Value Election of Hybrid Financial Instruments with Embedded Derivatives
When we enter into interest rate swaps which include off-market terms, we determine if these contracts are hybrid financial instruments with embedded derivatives requiring bifurcation between the host contract and the derivative instrument. We elected to initially and subsequently measure these hybrid financial instruments in their entirety at fair value with concurrent documentation of this election. Changes in the fair value of the hybrid financial instrument under this fair value election are recorded in earnings and are included in interest expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. The cash flows for these off-market swap instruments which contain an other-than-insignificant financing element at inception are included in cash flows provided by or used in financing activities on the accompanying consolidated statements of cash flows.
Income Taxes
We have elected to be taxed as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code. To continue to qualify as a REIT, we must continue to meet certain organizational and operational requirements, including a requirement to distribute at least 90% of our annual REIT taxable income to stockholders (which is computed without regard to the dividends-paid deduction or net capital gain and which does not necessarily equal net income as calculated in accordance with GAAP). As a REIT, we generally will not be subject to federal income tax on income that we distribute as dividends to our stockholders. If we fail to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, we will be subject to federal income tax on our taxable income at regular corporate income tax rates and generally will not be permitted to qualify for treatment as a REIT for federal income tax purposes for the four taxable years following the year during which qualification is lost, unless the Internal Revenue Service grants us relief under certain statutory provisions. Such an event could materially and adversely affect our net income and net cash available for distribution to stockholders. However, we believe that we are organized and operate in such a manner as to qualify for treatment as a REIT.
Subsequent Events
We evaluate subsequent events up until the date the consolidated financial statements are issued.
Distributions Paid
On January 4, 2022, we paid distributions of $7.7 million, which related to distributions in the amount of $0.04983333 per share of common stock to stockholders of record as of the close of business on December 20, 2021. On February 1, 2022, we paid distributions of $7.6 million, which related to distributions in the amount of $0.04983333 per share of common stock to stockholders of record as of the close of business on January 24, 2022. On March 4, 2022, we paid distributions of $7.6 million, which related to distributions in the amount of $0.04983333 per share of common stock to stockholders of record as of the close of business on February 22, 2022.
Amended and Restated Share Redemption Program
On March 17, 2022, our board of directors approved the March 2022 Share Redemption Program. The March 2022 Share Redemption Program decreases the reserve for Special Redemptions for calendar year 2022 from $10.0 million to $2.0 million. As such, during calendar year 2022, the March 2022 Share Redemption Program limits the number of shares we may redeem to those that we could purchase with the amount of net proceeds from the sale of shares under our dividend reinvestment plan during the prior calendar year, provided that once we have received requests for redemptions, whether in connection with Special Redemptions or otherwise, that if honored, and when combined with all prior redemptions made during the calendar year, would result in the amount of remaining funds available for the redemption of additional shares in such calendar year being $2.0 million or less, the last $2.0 million of available funds shall be reserved exclusively for redemptions sought in connection with Special Redemptions.
There were no other material changes to our share redemption program.
We may (a) amend, suspend or terminate the March 2022 Share Redemption Program for any reason, or (b) consistent with SEC guidance and interpretations, increase or decrease the funding available for the redemption of shares pursuant to the March 2022 Share Redemption Program, each upon ten business days’ notice to our stockholders. We may provide notice by including such information in a (i) Current Report on Form 8-K or in our annual or quarterly reports, all publicly filed with the SEC or (ii) separate mailing to the stockholders.
The March 2022 Share Redemption Program is effective for the March 31, 2022 redemption date.
Monthly Distributions
On March 28, 2022, our board of directors authorized a March 2022 distribution in the amount of $0.04983333 per share of common stock to stockholders of record as of the close of business on March 28, 2022, which we expect to pay in April 2022, and an April 2022 distribution in the amount of $0.04983333 per share of common stock to stockholders of record as of the close of business on April 20, 2022, which we expect to pay in May 2022.
Investors may choose to receive cash distributions or purchase additional shares through our dividend reinvestment plan.

---

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
We are exposed to the effects of interest rate changes as a result of borrowings used to maintain liquidity and to fund the acquisition, expansion and refinancing of our real estate investment portfolio and operations. We may also be exposed to the effects of changes in interest rates as a result of the future acquisition and origination of mortgage and other loans. Our profitability and the value of our real estate investment portfolio may be adversely affected during any period as a result of interest rate changes. Our interest rate risk management objectives are to limit the impact of interest rate changes on earnings, prepayment penalties and cash flows and to lower overall borrowing costs. We may manage interest rate risk by maintaining a ratio of fixed rate, long-term debt such that variable rate exposure is kept at an acceptable level or by utilizing a variety of financial instruments, including interest rate caps, floors, and swap agreements, in order to limit the effects of changes in interest rates on our operations. When we use these types of derivatives to hedge the risk of interest-earning assets or interest-bearing liabilities, we may be subject to certain risks, including the risk that losses on a hedge position will reduce the funds available for the payment of distributions to our stockholders and that the losses may exceed the amount we invested in the instruments.
The table below summarizes the outstanding principal balance, interest rate or weighted-average contractual interest rates and fair value for our notes payable for each category; and the notional amounts, average pay rates, average receive rates and fair value of our derivative instruments, based on maturity dates as of December 31, 2021 (dollars in thousands):
Maturity Date Total Value
or Notional
Amount
2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Fair Value
Assets
Derivative Instruments
Interest rate swaps, notional amount $ - $ 93,750 $ - $ 300,000 $ - $ 393,750 $ 757
Average pay rate (1)
- % 0.7 % - % 1.2 % - % 1.1 %
Average receive rate (2)
- % 0.1 % - % 0.1 % - % 0.1 %
Liabilities
Notes payable, principal outstanding
Fixed Rate $ - $ 123,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 123,000 $ 125,018
Interest rate - % 3.7 % - % - % - % 3.7 %
Variable Rate $ - $ 975,245 $ 374,045 $ - $ - $ 1,349,290 $ 1,344,562
Weighted-average contractual interest rate (3)
- % 2.0 % 1.5 % - % - % 1.9 %
Derivative Instruments
Interest rate swaps, notional amount $ 600,000 $ 426,640 $ - $ - $ - $ 1,026,640 $ 12,805
Average pay rate (1)
2.1 % 1.4 % - % - % - % 1.8 %
Average receive rate (2)
0.1 % 0.1 % - % - % - % 0.1 %
_____________________
(1) The average pay rate is based on the interest rate swap fixed rate.
(2) The average receive rate is based on the 30-day LIBOR rate as of December 31, 2021.
(3) The weighted-average contractual interest rate represents the actual interest rate in effect as of December 31, 2021, consisting of the contractual interest rate and using interest rate indices as of December 31, 2021, where applicable.
We borrow funds at a combination of fixed and variable rates. Interest rate fluctuations will generally not affect our future earnings or cash flows on our fixed rate debt, unless such instruments mature or are otherwise terminated. However, interest rate changes will affect the fair value of our fixed rate instruments. As of December 31, 2021, the fair value of our fixed rate debt was $125.0 million and the outstanding principal balance of our fixed rate debt was $123.0 million. The fair value estimate of our fixed rate debt is calculated using a discounted cash flow analysis utilizing rates we would expect to pay for debt of a similar type and remaining maturity if the loan was originated as of December 31, 2021. As we expect to hold our fixed rate instruments to maturity (unless the property securing the debt is sold and the loan is repaid) and the amounts due under such instruments would be limited to the outstanding principal balance and any accrued and unpaid interest, we do not expect that fluctuations in interest rates, and the resulting change in fair value of our fixed rate instruments, would have a significant impact on our operations.
Conversely, movements in interest rates on our variable rate debt would change our future earnings and cash flows, but not significantly affect the fair value of those instruments. However, changes in required risk premiums would result in changes in the fair value of variable rate instruments. As of December 31, 2021, we were exposed to market risks related to fluctuations in interest rates on $228.9 million of variable rate debt outstanding after giving consideration to the impact of interest rate swap agreements on approximately $1.1 billion of our variable rate debt. Based on interest rates as of December 31, 2021, if interest rates were 100 basis points higher during the 12 months ending December 31, 2022, interest expense on our variable rate debt would increase by $2.3 million. As of December 31, 2021, one-month LIBOR was 0.10125% and one-month BSBY was 0.08592%, if these indexes were reduced to 0% during the 12 months ending December 31, 2022, interest expense on our variable rate debt would decrease by up to $0.2 million.
The interest rate and weighted-average effective interest rate of our fixed rate debt and variable rate debt as of December 31, 2021 were 3.7% and 3.2%, respectively. The weighted-average effective interest rate represents the actual interest rate in effect as of December 31, 2021 (consisting of the contractual interest rate and the effect of interest rate swaps, if applicable), using interest rate indices as of December 31, 2021 where applicable.
We are exposed to financial market risk with respect to our investment in the SREIT (SGX-ST Ticker: OXMU). Financial market risk is the risk that we will incur economic losses due to adverse changes in our investment’s security price. Our exposure to changes in security prices is a result of our investment in these types of securities. Market prices are subject to fluctuation and, therefore, the amount realized in the subsequent sale of an investment may significantly differ from our carrying value. Fluctuation in the market prices of a security may result from any number of factors, including perceived changes in the underlying fundamental characteristics of the issuer, the relative price of alternative investments, interest rates, default rates and general market conditions. The SREIT’s units were first listed for trading on the SGX-ST on July 19, 2019. If an active trading market for the units does not develop or is not sustained, it may be difficult to sell our units. The market for Singapore REITs may trade a small number of securities and may be unable to respond effectively to increases in trading volume, potentially making prompt liquidation of our investment in the SREIT difficult. Even if an active trading market develops or we are able to negotiate block trades, if we or other significant investors sell or are perceived as intending to sell a substantial amount of units in a short period of time, the market price of our remaining units could be adversely affected. In addition, as a foreign equity investment, the trading price of units of the SREIT may be affected by political, economic, financial and social factors in the Singapore and Asian markets, including changes in government, economic and fiscal policies. Furthermore, we may be limited in our ability to sell our investment in the SREIT if our advisor and/or its affiliates are deemed to have material, non-public information regarding the SREIT. Charles J. Schreiber, Jr., the Chairman of our Board, our Chief Executive Officer, our President and our affiliated director, is a former director of the external manager of the SREIT, and an affiliate of our advisor serves as the U.S. asset manager to the SREIT. We do not currently engage in derivative or other hedging transactions to manage our investment’s security price risk. As of December 31, 2021, we held 215,841,899 units of the SREIT which represented 18.5% of the outstanding units of the SREIT as of that date. As of December 31, 2021, the aggregate value of our investment in the units of the SREIT was $180.2 million, which was based solely on the closing price of the SREIT units on the SGX-ST of $0.835 per unit as of December 31, 2021, and did not take into account any potential discount for the holding period risk due to the quantity of units held by us relative to the normal level of trading volume in the units. Based solely on the closing price per unit of the SREIT units as of December 31, 2021, if prices were to increase or decrease by 10%, our net income would increase or decrease by approximately $18.0 million.
For a discussion of the interest rate risks related to the current capital and credit markets, see Part I, Item 1A, “Risk Factors” and Part II, Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Market Outlook - Real Estate and Real Estate Finance Markets.”

---

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
See the Index to Financial Statements at page of this report.

---

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL
DISCLOSURE
None.

---

ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
As of the end of the period covered by this report, management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures. Based upon, and as of the date of, the evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this report to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports we file and submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported as and when required. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports we file and submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive officer and our principal financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) or 15d-15(f) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
In connection with the preparation of our Form 10-K, our management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2021. In making that assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013).
Based on its assessment, our management believes that, as of December 31, 2021, our internal control over financial reporting was effective based on those criteria. There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended December 31, 2021 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

---

ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION
Audit Committee Investigation
In February 2022, we discovered that the Chief Audit Executive of our external advisor had entered into arrangements with certain vendors that we believe either overcharged us and our affiliates for the services performed or charged for services that were never performed. As our advisor began to inquire into the matter, the Chief Audit Executive resigned.
Our audit committee, in conjunction with the audit committee of the board of directors of KBS Real Estate Investment Trust II, initiated an independent investigation with the assistance of independent counsel and an independent forensic accounting firm.
Subject to the joint audit committees’ ongoing investigation, we believe that between 2011 and 2021, certain vendors billed us for services for which we were either overcharged or which were never performed totaling approximately $0.8 million, that such vendors were in turn making payments to the individual, and that no other advisor officers or employees participated in the misconduct. In light of the discovery of the misconduct by the individual and certain vendors, we are working with our advisor to address these matters.
Our advisor has agreed to reimburse us both for any amounts inappropriately charged to us, and for the costs we incur in the joint audit committees’ investigation, in each case regardless of whether any such amounts are recoverable from either the vendors or the individual. The reimbursement of these overpayments will be partially credited against asset management fees that were deferred in prior periods of $0.5 million that would have been due by us to our advisor in those periods as a result of the increase in our net income and MFFO for such periods, and corresponding decrease in expenses, related to the charges that we should not have incurred. The remainder of the reimbursement, $0.3 million, will be reimbursed to us in cash by our advisor.

---

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Directors and Executive Officers
We have provided below certain information about our directors and executive officers.
Name Position(s) Age (1)
Charles J. Schreiber, Jr. Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer, President and Director 70
Jeffrey K. Waldvogel Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary 44
Stacie K. Yamane Chief Accounting Officer and Assistant Secretary 57
Jeffrey A. Dritley Independent Director 65
Stuart A. Gabriel, Ph.D. Independent Director 68
Ron D. Sturzenegger Independent Director 62
_____________________
(1) As of March 1, 2022.
Charles J. Schreiber, Jr. is our Chairman of the Board, our Chief Executive Officer and one of our directors, positions he has held since January 2010, January 2010 and December 2009, respectively. In August 2019, he was also elected as our President. Mr. Schreiber is the Chairman and President of our advisor, and he served as the Chief Executive Officer of our advisor from October 2004 through December 2021. He is also the Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and a director of KBS Growth & Income REIT, positions he has held since January 2015. Mr. Schreiber is Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and a director of KBS REIT II, positions he has held since August 2007, August 2007 and July 2007, respectively. In August 2019, Mr. Schreiber was also elected President of KBS Growth & Income REIT and KBS REIT II. Mr. Schreiber was Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and a director of KBS REIT I from June 2005 until its liquidation in December 2018. Other than de minimis amounts owned by family members or family trusts, Mr. Schreiber indirectly owns and controls a 50% interest in KBS Holdings LLC, which is the sole owner of our advisor and our dealer manager. In addition, Mr. Schreiber controls the voting rights with respect to the 50% interest of KBS Holdings LLC held indirectly by the estate of Peter M. Bren (together with other family members). KBS Holdings LLC is a sponsor of our company and is or was a sponsor of KBS REIT I, KBS REIT II, Pacific Oak Strategic Opportunity REIT, Inc. (“Pacific Oak Strategic Opportunity REIT I”), KBS Legacy Partners Apartment REIT, Inc. (“KBS Legacy Partner Apartment REIT”), Pacific Oak Strategic Opportunity REIT II, Inc. (“Pacific Oak Strategic Opportunity REIT II”) and KBS Growth & Income REIT, which were formed in 2009, 2005, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2013 and 2015, respectively.
Mr. Schreiber is the Chairman and President of KBS Realty Advisors and is a principal of Koll Bren Schreiber Realty Advisors, Inc., each an active and nationally recognized real estate investment advisor. These entities are registered as investment advisers with the SEC. Messrs. Bren and Schreiber were the founding partners of the KBS-affiliated investment advisors. The first investment advisor affiliated with Messrs. Bren and Schreiber was formed in 1992. As of December 31, 2021, KBS Realty Advisors, together with KBS affiliates, including KBS Capital Advisors, had been involved in the investment in or management of approximately $28.9 billion of real estate investments on behalf of institutional investors, including public and private pension plans, endowments and foundations, institutional and sovereign wealth funds, and the investors in us, KBS REIT I, KBS REIT II, Pacific Oak Strategic Opportunity REIT I (advisory agreement terminated as of October 31, 2019), KBS Legacy Partners Apartment REIT, Pacific Oak Strategic Opportunity REIT II (advisory agreement terminated as of October 31, 2019) and KBS Growth & Income REIT. Through October 31, 2019, our advisor also served as the U.S. asset manager for Keppel Pacific Oak US REIT, and KBS Realty Advisors serves as the U.S. asset manager for Prime US REIT, both Singapore real estate investment trusts.
Mr. Schreiber oversees all aspects of KBS Capital Advisors’ and KBS Realty Advisors’ operations, including the acquisition, management and disposition of individual investments and portfolios of investments for KBS-sponsored programs and KBS-advised investors. He also directs all facets of KBS Capital Advisors’ and KBS Realty Advisors’ business activities and is responsible for investor relationships.
In addition, from July 2018 until February 2022, Mr. Schreiber served as Chairman of the Board and a director for KBS US Prime Property Management Pte. Ltd., which is the external manager of Prime US REIT, a Singapore real estate investment trust that is listed on the SGX-ST. Mr. Schreiber holds an indirect ownership interest in KBS US Prime Property Management Pte. Ltd. and KBS Asia Partners Pte. Ltd., which is the sponsor of Prime US REIT.
Mr. Schreiber has been involved in real estate development, management, acquisition, disposition and financing for more than 49 years and with the acquisition, origination, management, disposition and financing of real estate-related debt investments for more than 30 years. Prior to forming the first KBS-affiliated investment advisor in 1992, he served as the Executive Vice President of Koll Investment Management Services and Executive Vice President of Acquisitions/Dispositions for The Koll Company. During the mid-1970s through the 1980s, he was Founder and President of Pacific Development Company and was previously Senior Vice President/Southern California Regional Manager of Ashwill-Burke Commercial Brokerage.
Mr. Schreiber graduated from the University of Southern California with a Bachelor’s Degree in Finance with an emphasis in Real Estate. During his four years at USC, he did graduate work in the then newly formed Real Estate Department in the USC Graduate School of Business. He is currently an Executive Board Member for the USC Lusk Center for Real Estate at the University of Southern California Marshall School of Business/School of Policy, Planning and Development and serves as a member of the Executive Committee for the Public Non-Listed REIT Council for the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts. He is also a member of the National Council of Real Estate Investment Fiduciaries. Mr. Schreiber has served as a member of the board of directors and executive committee of The Irvine Company since August 2016, and since December 2016, Mr. Schreiber has served on the Board of Trustees of The Irvine Company.
The board of directors has concluded that Mr. Schreiber is qualified to serve as a director, Chairman of the Board and as our Chief Executive Officer and President for reasons including his extensive industry and leadership experience. With more than 49 years of experience in real estate development, management, acquisition and disposition and more than 30 years of experience with the acquisition, origination, management, disposition and financing of real estate-related debt investments, he has the depth and breadth of experience to implement our business strategy. He gained his understanding of the real estate and real estate-finance markets through hands-on experience with acquisitions, asset and portfolio management, asset repositioning and dispositions. As our Chief Executive Officer and a principal of our advisor, Mr. Schreiber is best-positioned to provide the board of directors with insights and perspectives on the execution of our business strategy, our operations and other internal matters. Further, as a principal of KBS-affiliated investment advisors, as Chief Executive Officer, President, Chairman of the Board and a director of KBS REIT II and KBS Growth & Income REIT, as a director and trustee of The Irvine Company, as former Chairman of the Board and a director of KBS US Prime Property Management Pte. Ltd. and as former Chief Executive Officer, Chairman of the Board and a director of KBS REIT I, Mr. Schreiber brings to the board of directors demonstrated management and leadership ability.
Jeffrey K. Waldvogel is our Chief Financial Officer, a position he has held since June 2015. In July 2018, he was also elected our Treasurer and Secretary. He is also the Chief Financial Officer of our advisor and KBS REIT II, positions he has held for each of these entities since June 2015. In August 2018, Mr. Waldvogel was elected the Treasurer and Secretary of KBS REIT II. He is also the Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary of KBS Growth & Income REIT, positions he has held since June 2015, April 2017 and April 2017, respectively. From June 2015 until November 2019, he also served as the Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary of Pacific Oak Strategic Opportunity REIT I and Pacific Oak Strategic Opportunity REIT II. He was Chief Financial Officer of KBS REIT I and KBS Legacy Partners Apartment REIT from June 2015 until their respective liquidations in December 2018. In January 2022, Mr. Waldvogel was also appointed the Chief Financial Officer of KBS Realty Advisors.
Mr. Waldvogel has been employed by an affiliate of our advisor since November 2010. With respect to the KBS-sponsored REITs advised by our advisor, he served as the Director of Finance and Reporting from July 2012 to June 2015 and as the VP Controller Technical Accounting from November 2010 to July 2012. In these roles Mr. Waldvogel was responsible for overseeing internal and external financial reporting, valuation analysis, financial analysis, REIT compliance, debt compliance and reporting, and technical accounting.
Prior to joining an affiliate of our advisor in 2010, Mr. Waldvogel was an audit senior manager at Ernst & Young LLP. During his eight years at Ernst & Young LLP, where he worked from October 2002 to October 2010, Mr. Waldvogel performed or supervised various auditing engagements, including the audit of financial statements presented in accordance with GAAP, as well as financial statements prepared on a tax basis. These auditing engagements were for clients in a variety of industries, with a significant focus on clients in the real estate industry.
In April 2002, Mr. Waldvogel received a Master of Accountancy Degree and Bachelor of Science from Brigham Young University in Provo, Utah. Mr. Waldvogel is a Certified Public Accountant (California).
Stacie K. Yamane is our Chief Accounting Officer, a position she has held since January 2010. In July 2018, she was also elected our Assistant Secretary. Ms. Yamane is also the Chief Accounting Officer, Portfolio Accounting of our advisor and Chief Accounting Officer of KBS REIT II and KBS Growth & Income REIT, positions she has held for these entities since October 2008, October 2008 and January 2015, respectively. From August 2009 until November 2019 and from February 2013 until November 2019, she served as Chief Accounting Officer of Pacific Oak Strategic Opportunity REIT I and Pacific Oak Strategic Opportunity REIT II, respectively. From August 2009 until its liquidation in December 2018, she served as Chief Accounting Officer of KBS Legacy Partners Apartment REIT; from October 2008 until its liquidation in December 2018, she served as Chief Accounting Officer of KBS REIT I. From July 2007 to December 2008, Ms. Yamane served as the Chief Financial Officer of KBS REIT II and from July 2007 to October 2008 she served as Controller of KBS REIT II; from October 2004 to October 2008, Ms. Yamane served as Fund Controller of our advisor; from June 2005 to December 2008, she served as Chief Financial Officer of KBS REIT I and from June 2005 to October 2008 she served as Controller of KBS REIT I.
Ms. Yamane also serves as Senior Vice President/Controller, Portfolio Accounting for KBS Realty Advisors, a position she has held since 2004. She served as a Vice President/Portfolio Accounting with KBS-affiliated investment advisors from 1995 to 2004. At KBS Realty Advisors, from 2004 through 2015, Ms. Yamane was responsible for client accounting/reporting for two real estate portfolios. These portfolios consisted of industrial, office and retail properties as well as land parcels. Ms. Yamane worked closely with portfolio managers, asset managers, property managers and clients to ensure the completion of timely and accurate accounting, budgeting and financial reporting. In addition, she assisted in the supervision and management of KBS Realty Advisors’ accounting department.
Prior to joining an affiliate of KBS Realty Advisors in 1995, Ms. Yamane was an audit manager at Kenneth Leventhal & Company, a CPA firm specializing in real estate. During her eight years at Kenneth Leventhal & Company, Ms. Yamane performed or supervised a variety of auditing, accounting and consulting engagements including the audit of financial statements presented in accordance with GAAP, as well as financial statements presented on a cash and tax basis, the valuation of asset portfolios and the review and analysis of internal control systems. Her experiences with various KBS-affiliated entities and Kenneth Leventhal & Company give her almost 30 years of real estate experience.
Ms. Yamane received a Bachelor of Arts Degree in Business Administration with a dual concentration in Accounting and Management Information Systems from California State University, Fullerton. She is a Certified Public Accountant (inactive California).
Jeffrey A. Dritley is one of our independent directors and is chair of the conflicts committee, positions he has held since October 2017 and July 2019, respectively. He is also an independent director and chair of the conflicts committee of KBS REIT II, positions he has held since October 2017 and July 2019, respectively. Mr. Dritley is Founder and Managing Partner of Kearny Real Estate Company. Kearny, headquartered in Los Angeles, is a partnership of experienced real estate professionals active in the acquisition, entitlement, repositioning, development, leasing, management and disposition of large, complex commercial projects in Southern California. Since 1993, Kearny has been involved in approximately $5.2 billion of projects including the acquisition and work-out of approximately $2.3 billion of distressed real estate debt.
From 1993 to 2001, Mr. Dritley served as a Managing Director of Morgan Stanley, where he was responsible for the Morgan Stanley Real Estate Fund’s (“MSREF”) West Coast operations and was a member of the global investment committee. During his tenure, MSREF was involved in over $3 billion of transactions, including significant acquisitions, refinancings and work-outs. From 1986 to 1993, Mr. Dritley was employed by The Koll Company, a major real estate development company in the western United States. From 1979 to 1984, Mr. Dritley was employed by Peat, Marwick, Mitchell in Kansas City and New York City.
Mr. Dritley has over 35 years of experience in the real estate industry. His experience has ranged from the acquisition, entitlement, development and redevelopment of over 14 million square feet of properties in Southern California, to creating and managing an organization with over 100 employees in the United States, Europe and Asia focused on buying and restructuring non-performing loans.
From 2009 to 2016 Mr. Dritley served as a director, chairman of the compensation committee and member of the investment committee of Bixby Land Company, a private REIT with assets exceeding $1 billion, and from 2008 to 2016, he served as a Senior Advisor to Trigate Property Partners, a real estate private equity firm that manages a partnership with CalSTRS. He also has been active in several professional organizations, including the Los Angeles County Economic Development Corporation, for which he served on the Executive Committee, the Urban Land Institute and the Los Angeles Chapter of NAIOP, of which he is a past president. His community involvement included serving on the board of the Neighborhood Youth Association in Venice, California and volunteering his time for youth sports and Boy Scouts. Mr. Dritley is a Certified Public Accountant and holds a Bachelor’s Degree in Business Administration from the University of Missouri and an MBA from Harvard Business School.
The board of directors has concluded that Mr. Dritley is qualified to serve as an independent director for reasons including his expertise in real estate acquisition, restructuring and disposition. His over 35 years of experience in the real estate industry gives him significant experience that will be of great benefit to our company and make him well-positioned to advise the board of directors with respect to potential investment, restructuring and disposition opportunities. As Founder and Managing Partner of Kearny Real Estate Company, Mr. Dritley has encountered the myriad of practical, operational and other challenges that face large real estate companies like ours. Further, in the course of serving on the board of directors of Bixby Land Company and as a Senior Advisor to Trigate Property Partners, Mr. Dritley has developed strong leadership and consensus building skills that are a valuable asset to the board of directors. In addition, as a Certified Public Accountant, he possesses valuable expertise in evaluating the financial and operational results of companies such as ours.
Stuart A. Gabriel, Ph.D. is one of our independent directors and is chair of the audit committee, positions he has held since September 2010 and August 2018, respectively. Professor Gabriel is also an independent director and is chair of the audit committee of KBS REIT II, positions he has held since March 2008 and August 2018, respectively. Professor Gabriel was an independent director of KBS REIT I from June 2005 until its liquidation in December 2018. Since June 2007, Professor Gabriel has served as Director of the Richard S. Ziman Center for Real Estate and Professor of Finance and Arden Realty Chair at the UCLA Anderson School of Management. Prior to joining UCLA he was Director and Lusk Chair in Real Estate at the USC Lusk Center for Real Estate, a position he held from 1999 to 2007. Professor Gabriel also served as Professor of Finance and Business Economics in the Marshall School of Business at the University of Southern California, a position he held from 1990 to 2007. He received a number of awards at UCLA and USC for outstanding graduate teaching. In 2004, he was elected President of the American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association. Professor Gabriel serves on the editorial boards of seven academic journals. He is also a Fellow of the Homer Hoyt Institute for Advanced Real Estate Studies. Since March 2016, Professor Gabriel has served on the board of directors of KB Home and is a member of its audit committee. Professor Gabriel has published extensively on the topics of real estate finance and urban and regional economics. His teaching and academic research experience include analysis of real estate and real estate capital markets performance as well as structured finance products, including credit default swaps, commercial mortgage-backed securities and collateralized debt obligations. Professor Gabriel serves as a consultant to numerous corporate and governmental entities. From 1986 through 1990, Professor Gabriel served on the economics staff of the Federal Reserve Board in Washington, D.C. He also has been a Visiting Scholar at the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco. Professor Gabriel holds a Ph.D. in Economics from the University of California, Berkeley.
The board of directors has concluded that Professor Gabriel is qualified to serve as an independent director for reasons including his extensive knowledge and understanding of the real estate and finance markets and real estate finance products. As a professor of real estate finance and economics, Professor Gabriel brings unique perspective to the board of directors. His years of research and analysis of the real estate and finance markets make Professor Gabriel well-positioned to advise us with respect to our investment and financing strategy. This expertise also makes him an invaluable resource for assessing and managing risks facing our company. Through his experience as a director of KBS REIT II and KB Home and as a former director of KBS REIT I, he also has an understanding of the requirements of serving on a public company board.
Ron D. Sturzenegger is one of our independent directors, a position he has held since August 28, 2019. On September 3, 2019, Mr. Sturzenegger was also appointed as an independent director of KBS REIT II.
Mr. Sturzenegger has over 30 years of experience in the real estate industry through his career at major financial institutions. From July 2014 to January 2018, Mr. Sturzenegger was Enterprise Business & Community Engagement Executive at Bank of America, responsible for leading Bank of America’s strategy to integrate the delivery of its products and services to customers and clients in 90 key U.S. markets. In his role overseeing Enterprise Business & Community Engagement, he was responsible for driving global integration opportunities across the enterprise. In addition, Mr. Sturzenegger led Bank of America’s strategy through which leaders representing all the company’s various businesses in a given market or community worked together to integrate the delivery of products and services for customers and clients, including the oversight of the Market Presidents Organization.
From August 2011 to April 2015, Mr. Sturzenegger was on the Management Committee of Bank of America and Legacy Asset Servicing (LAS) Executive at Bank of America, whose responsibilities included resolving legacy mortgage issues following Bank of America’s acquisition of Countrywide Financial and Merrill Lynch during the financial crisis and the downturn in the U.S. housing markets, the management of the servicing of current, delinquent and at-risk loans, and the development and implementation of operational capabilities and processes to address regulators’ concerns regarding robo-signing.
From January 2009 to August 2011, Mr. Sturzenegger served as Managing Director and Global Head of Real Estate, Gaming and Lodging Investment Banking at Bank of America Merrill Lynch, and from January 2002 to December 2008, Mr. Sturzenegger served as Managing Director and Global Head of Real Estate, Gaming and Lodging Investment Banking for Bank of America Securities. From July 1998 to December 2001, he served as Head of Real Estate Mergers and Acquisitions at Bank of America Securities. From July 1986 to June 1998, Mr. Sturzenegger served in various roles at Morgan Stanley in Real Estate Investment Banking. From 1982 to 1984, Mr. Sturzenegger was a Financial Analyst with Bain & Company.
Since January 2020, Mr. Sturzenegger has served on the board of trustees of Conversus StepStone Private Markets. He is a member of its audit committee and nominating and governance committee and serves as the chair of its independent trustees committee. Mr. Sturzenegger serves on the Executive Committee for the policy advisory board for the Fisher Center for Real Estate & Urban Economics. He a member of the advisory board of the Stanford Professionals in Real Estate. Mr. Sturzenegger and his wife previously served as Chairs of the Parents’ Advisory Board for Stanford University. Mr. Sturzenegger holds a Bachelor of Science Degree in Industrial Engineering from Stanford University and an MBA from Harvard Business School.
The board of directors has concluded that Mr. Sturzenegger is qualified to serve as an independent director for reasons including his extensive real estate industry, investment banking and leadership experience. Mr. Sturzenegger’s 30 years of experience in the real estate industry through his career at major financial institutions given him the depth and breadth of experience from which to draw in advising our company. Through his executive and management roles at Bank of America, Mr. Sturzenegger brings to the board demonstrated management and leadership ability.
Corporate Governance
The Audit Committee
Our board of directors has established an audit committee. The audit committee’s function is to assist the board of directors in fulfilling its responsibilities by overseeing (i) our accounting and financial reporting processes, (ii) the integrity of our financial statements, (iii) our independent registered public accounting firm’s qualifications, performance and independence, and (iv) the performance of our internal audit function. The audit committee fulfills these responsibilities primarily by carrying out the activities enumerated in the audit committee charter. The audit committee charter is available on our website at www.kbsreitiii.com.
The members of the audit committee are Jeffrey A. Dritley, Stuart A. Gabriel, Ph.D. (chair) and Ron D. Sturzenegger. The board of directors has determined that all of the members of the audit committee are “independent” as defined by the New York Stock Exchange. All of the members of the audit committee have significant financial and/or accounting experience, and the board of directors has determined that all of the members of the audit committee satisfy the SEC’s requirements for an “audit committee financial expert.”
Code of Conduct and Ethics
We have adopted a Code of Conduct and Ethics that applies to all of our executive officers and directors, including but not limited to, our principal executive officer, principal financial officer and principal accounting officer. Our Code of Conduct and Ethics can be found at www.kbsreitiii.com.

---

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Compensation of Executive Officers
Our conflicts committee, which is composed of all of our independent directors, discharges our board of directors’ responsibilities relating to the compensation of our executives. However, we currently do not have any paid employees and our executive officers do not receive any compensation directly from us for services rendered to us. Our executive officers are officers and/or employees of, or hold an indirect ownership interest in, our advisor and/or its affiliates, and our executive officers are compensated by these entities, in part, for their services to us or our subsidiaries. See Part III, Item 13, “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director Independence - Report of the Conflicts Committee - Certain Transactions with Related Persons” for a discussion of the fees paid to our advisor and its affiliates.
Compensation of Directors
If a director is also one of our executive officers, we do not pay any compensation to that person for services rendered as a director. The amount and form of compensation payable to our independent directors for their service to us is determined by the conflicts committee, based upon recommendations from our advisor. One of our executive officers, Mr. Schreiber, manages and controls our advisor, and through our advisor, he is involved in recommending and setting the compensation to be paid to our independent directors.
We have provided below certain information regarding compensation earned by or paid to our directors during fiscal year 2021.
Name Fees Earned or
Paid in Cash in 2021
All Other
Compensation Total
Jeffrey A. Dritley $ 226,500 $ - $ 226,500
Stuart A. Gabriel, Ph.D. 208,000 - 208,000
Ron D. Sturzenegger 201,500 - 201,500
Charles J. Schreiber, Jr. (1)
- - -
_____________________
(1) Director who is also an executive officer and does not receive compensation for services rendered as a director.
Cash Compensation
We compensate each of our independent directors with an annual retainer of $135,000 as well as paying compensation to our independent directors for attending meetings as follows:
•each member of the audit committee and conflicts committee is paid $10,000 annually for service on such committees (except that the chair of each of the audit committee and conflicts committee is paid $20,000 annually for service as the chair of such committees);
•after the tenth board of directors meeting of each calendar year, each independent director is paid (i) $2,500 for each in-person board of directors meeting attended for the remainder of the calendar year and (ii) $2,000 for each teleconference board of directors meeting attended for the remainder of the calendar year;
•after the tenth audit committee meeting of each calendar year, each member of the audit committee is paid (i) $2,500 for each in-person audit committee meeting attended for the remainder of the calendar year and (ii) $2,000 for each teleconference audit committee meeting attended for the remainder of the calendar year (except that the audit committee chair is paid $3,000 for each in-person and teleconference audit committee meeting attended after the tenth audit committee meeting of each calendar year, for the remainder of each calendar year); and
•after the tenth conflicts committee meeting of each calendar year, each member of the conflicts committee is paid (i) $2,500 for each in-person conflicts committee meeting attended for the remainder of the calendar year and (ii) $2,000 for each teleconference conflicts committee meeting attended for the remainder of the calendar year (except that the conflicts committee chair is paid $3,000 for each in-person and teleconference conflicts committee meeting attended after the tenth conflicts committee meeting of each calendar year, for the remainder of each calendar year).
All directors receive reimbursement of reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with attendance at board of directors meetings and committee meetings.

---

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND
RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
Stock Ownership
The following table shows, as of March 28, 2022, the amount of our common stock beneficially owned (unless otherwise indicated) by (1) any person who is known by us to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of the outstanding shares of our common stock, (2) our directors, (3) our executive officers, and (4) all of our directors and executive officers as a group.
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner (1)
Amount and Nature
of Beneficial Ownership (2)
Percentage of all Outstanding Shares
KBS Capital Advisors LLC 20,857 (3)
*
Jeffrey A. Dritley, Independent Director - -
Stuart A. Gabriel, Ph.D., Independent Director - -
Charles J. Schreiber, Jr., Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer, President and Director 20,857 (3)
*
Ron D. Sturzenegger, Independent Director - -
Jeffrey K. Waldvogel, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary - -
Stacie K. Yamane, Chief Accounting Officer and Assistant Secretary - -
All executive officers and directors as a group 20,857 (3)
*
_____________________
* Less than 1% of the outstanding common stock.
(1) The address of each named beneficial owner is 800 Newport Center Drive, Suite 700, Newport Beach, California 92660.
(2) None of the shares is pledged as security.
(3) Includes 20,857 shares owned by KBS Capital Advisors, which is indirectly controlled by Charles J. Schreiber, Jr.

---

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
Director Independence
A majority of our board of directors, Messrs. Dritley, Gabriel and Sturzenegger, meet the independence criteria as specified in our charter. Our charter defines an independent director as a director who is not and has not for the last two years been associated, directly or indirectly, with our sponsor, KBS Holdings, or our advisor, KBS Capital Advisors. A director is deemed to be associated with our sponsor or our advisor if he or she (i) owns an interest in our sponsor, our advisor or any of their affiliates; (ii) is employed by our sponsor, our advisor or any of their affiliates; (iii) is an officer or director of our sponsor, our advisor or any of their affiliates, (iv) performs services, other than as a director, for us; (v) is a director for more than three REITs organized by our sponsor or advised by our advisor; or (vi) has any material business or professional relationship with our sponsor, our advisor or any of their affiliates. A business or professional relationship will be deemed material per se if the annual gross revenue derived by the director from our sponsor, our advisor or any of their affiliates exceeds 5% of (1) the director’s annual gross revenue derived from all sources during either of the last two years or (2) the director’s net worth on a fair market value basis. An indirect relationship is defined to include circumstances in which the director’s spouse, parents, children, siblings, mothers- or fathers-in-law, sons- or daughters-in-law or brothers- or sisters-in-law is or has been associated with us, our sponsor, our advisor or any of their affiliates.
In addition, and although our shares are not listed for trading on any national securities exchange, all of our current independent directors are “independent” as defined by the New York Stock Exchange. The board of directors has affirmatively determined that Jeffrey A. Dritley, Stuart A. Gabriel, Ph.D. and Ron D. Sturzenegger each satisfies the New York Stock Exchange independence standards.
Report of the Conflicts Committee
Review of Our Policies
The conflicts committee has reviewed our policies and determined that they are in the best interest of our stockholders. Set forth below is a discussion of the basis for that determination.
Offering Policy. We continue to offer shares under our dividend reinvestment plan. In some states, we will need to renew the registration statement annually or file a new registration statement to continue our dividend reinvestment plan offering. We may terminate our dividend reinvestment plan offering at any time. For the year ended December 31, 2021, the costs of raising capital in our dividend reinvestment plan offering represented less than 1% of the capital raised.
Our conflicts committee and our board of directors continue to evaluate various alternatives available to us, including whether or not to convert to a non-listed, perpetual-life “NAV REIT.” Our conflicts committee and board of directors remain focused on providing stable distributions and enhanced liquidity to stockholders. In the near term, while our conflicts committee and board of directors explore alternatives available to us, we may market certain of our assets for sale. Based on our assessment of alternatives available to us, market conditions and our further assessment of our capital raising prospects, our conflicts committee and board of directors may conclude that it would be in the best interest of our stockholders to (i) convert to an “NAV REIT,” (ii) continue to operate as a going concern under our current business plan, or (iii) adopt a plan of liquidation that would involve the sale of our remaining assets (in which event such plan would be presented to stockholders for approval). There is no assurance that any alternative being considered by our board of directors will provide a return to stockholders that equals or exceeds our estimated value per share as of November 1, 2021, and although we remain focused on providing enhanced liquidity to stockholders while maximizing returns to stockholders, we can provide no assurances in this regard. We also can provide no assurances as to whether or when any alternative being considered by our board of directors will be consummated. See Part I, Item 1A, “Risk Factors - Risks of the Proposed NAV REIT Conversion” and “-Certain Transactions with Related Persons.”
Acquisition and Investment Policies. As of February 28, 2022, we owned 16 office properties, one mixed-use office/retail property and an investment in the equity securities of the SREIT.
We have acquired and manage a diverse portfolio of core real estate properties, which are generally lower risk, existing properties with at least 80% occupancy. Our primary investment focus has been core office properties located throughout the United States, though we have and may in the future invest in other types of properties and real estate-related investments. Our core property focus in the U.S. office sector has reflected a more value-creating core strategy, which is also known as a core-plus strategy. In many cases, these properties have slightly higher (10% to 20%) vacancy rates and/or higher near-term lease rollover at acquisition than more conservative value-maintaining core properties. These characteristics may provide us with opportunities to lease space at higher rates, especially in markets with increasing absorption, or to re-lease space in these properties at higher rates, bringing below-market rates of in-place expiring leases up to market rates. Many of these properties have required or will require a moderate level of additional investment for capital expenditures and tenant improvement costs in order to improve or rebrand the properties and increase rental rates. Thus, we believe these properties provide an opportunity for us to achieve more significant capital appreciation by increasing occupancy, negotiating new leases with higher rental rates and/or executing enhancement projects.
The primary types of office properties we intend to invest in include low-rise, mid-rise and high-rise office buildings and office parks in urban and suburban locations, especially those that are in or near central business districts or have access to transportation. In addition, we may consider acquiring industrial properties (including warehouse and distribution facilities, office/warehouse flex properties, research and development properties and light industrial properties) and retail properties. Although this is our primary investment focus, we may make adjustments to our investment focus based on real estate market conditions and investment opportunities.
We will generally hold fee title to or a long-term leasehold estate in the properties we acquire. We may also invest in or acquire operating companies or other entities that own and operate assets that meet our investment objectives. We will make investments in other entities when we consider it more efficient to acquire an entity that already owns assets meeting our investment objectives than to acquire such assets directly. We have also made investments through joint ventures, and in the future we may enter into other joint ventures, partnerships and co-ownership arrangements (including preferred equity investments) or participations for the purpose of obtaining interests in real estate properties and for the development or improvement of properties.
We may make adjustments to our target portfolio based on real estate market conditions and investment opportunities. We will not forego a good investment because it does not precisely fit our expected portfolio composition. We believe that we are most likely to meet our investment objectives through the careful selection and underwriting of assets. When making an acquisition, we will emphasize the performance and risk characteristics of that investment, how that investment will fit with our portfolio-level performance objectives, the other assets in our portfolio and how the returns and risks of that investment compare to the returns and risks of available investment alternatives. Thus, to the extent that our advisor presents us with what we believe to be good investment opportunities that allow us to meet the REIT requirements under the Internal Revenue Code, our portfolio composition may vary from what we currently expect. In fact, we may invest in whatever types of real estate or real estate-related assets we believe are in our best interests. However, we will attempt to construct a portfolio that produces stable and attractive returns by spreading risk across different real estate investments.
See also the discussion regarding the possible conversion to an NAV REIT.
Also, in connection with the Singapore Transaction (defined under “- Certain Transactions with Related Persons - Singapore Transaction”), our board of directors and conflicts committee adopted the asset Allocation Process proposed by our advisor and KBS Realty Advisors.
Allocation Policy. In connection with the Singapore Transaction, our advisor and KBS Realty Advisors proposed that our conflicts committee and board of directors adopt an asset allocation policy (the “Allocation Process”) among us, KBS REIT II and KBS Growth & Income REIT (collectively, the “Core Strategy REITs”) and the SREIT. Our conflicts committee and board of directors adopted the Allocation Process as proposed. The Allocation Process provides that, in order to mitigate potential conflicts of interest that may arise among the Core REITs and the SREIT, upon the listing of the SREIT on the SGX-ST on July 19, 2019, potential asset acquisitions that meet all of the following criteria would be offered first to the SREIT:
i)Class A office building;
ii)Purchase price of at least $125.0 million;
iii)Average occupancy of at least 90% for the first two years based on contractual in-place leases; and
iv)Stabilized property investment yield that is generally supportive of the distributions per unit of the SREIT.
To the extent the SREIT does not have the funds to acquire the asset or to the extent the external manager of the SREIT decides to forego the acquisition opportunity, such asset may then be offered to the Core Strategy REITs at the discretion of our advisor.
Borrowing Policies. We financed our real estate acquisitions to date with a combination of the proceeds received from our now-terminated initial public offering and debt. We may use proceeds from borrowings to finance acquisitions of new real estate and real estate-related investments; to pay for property improvements, repairs and tenant build-outs to properties and for other capital expenditures; to refinance existing indebtedness; to pay distributions; to fund the redemption or repurchase of our shares; or to provide working capital. Our investment strategy is to utilize primarily secured debt to finance our investment portfolio, though from time to time we may also use unsecured debt.
We expect that our debt financing and other liabilities will be between 45% and 65% of the cost of our tangible assets (before deducting depreciation and other non-cash reserves). There is no limitation on the amount we may borrow for the purchase of any single asset. We limit our total liabilities to 75% of the cost of our tangible assets (before deducting depreciation and other non-cash reserves) meaning that our borrowings and other liabilities may exceed our maximum target leverage of 65% of the cost of our tangible assets without violating these borrowing restrictions. We may exceed the 75% limit only if a majority of the conflicts committee approves each borrowing in excess of this limitation and we disclose such borrowings to our stockholders in our next quarterly report with an explanation from the conflicts committee of the justification for the excess borrowing. To the extent financing in excess of this limit is available on attractive terms, the conflicts committee may approve debt in excess of this limit. From time to time, our total liabilities could also be below 45% of the cost of our tangible assets due to the lack of availability of debt financing. As of February 28, 2022, our borrowings and other liabilities were approximately 55% of both the cost (before deducting depreciation and other noncash reserves) and book value (before deducting depreciation) of our tangible assets.
Disposition Policies. Our advisor develops a well-defined exit strategy for each investment we make and periodically performs a hold-sell analysis on each asset. These periodic analyses focus on the remaining available value enhancement opportunities for the asset, the demand for the asset in the marketplace, market conditions and our overall portfolio objectives to determine if the sale of the asset, whether via an individual sale or as part of a portfolio sale or merger, would generate a favorable return to our stockholders. Economic and market conditions may influence us to hold our assets for different periods of time. We may sell an asset before the end of the expected holding period if we believe that market conditions and asset positioning have maximized its value to us or the sale of the asset would otherwise be in the best interests of our stockholders.
During the year ended December 31, 2021, we sold two real estate properties. In addition, on November 9, 2021, through our indirect wholly owned subsidiary, REIT Properties III, we sold 73,720,000 units in the SREIT for $58.9 million, net of fees and costs, pursuant to a block trade, reducing our ownership in the SREIT to 18.5% of the outstanding units of the SREIT as of that date. As of February 28, 2022, REIT Properties III held 215,841,899 units of the SREIT, which represented 18.5% of the outstanding units of the SREIT as of that date.
Section 5.11 of our charter requires that we seek stockholder approval of our liquidation if our shares of common stock are not listed on a national securities exchange by September 30, 2020, unless a majority of the conflicts committee determines that liquidation is not then in the best interest of our stockholders. Pursuant to our charter requirement, the conflicts committee assessed our portfolio of investments, and with consideration of the then current market conditions, including the uncertainty as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic and lack of liquidity in the marketplace, as well as our conflicts committee’s and board of directors’ continuing review and evaluation of various alternatives available to us, on August 30, 2021, our conflicts committee unanimously determined to postpone approval of our liquidation. Section 5.11 of our charter requires that the conflicts committee revisit the issue of liquidation at least annually. At our annual meeting of stockholders held on May 7, 2020, our stockholders approved the removal of Section 5.11 of our charter. As set forth in the proxy statement for our annual meeting of stockholders, implementation of this amendment to our charter and our conversion to an NAV REIT remain subject to further approval of our conflicts committee. See “- Certain Transactions with Related Persons - Proposed NAV REIT Conversion.”
Policy Regarding Working Capital Reserves. We establish an annual budget for capital requirements and working capital reserves that we update periodically during the year. We may also use proceeds from our dividend reinvestment plan offering, cash on hand, proceeds from asset sales, debt proceeds and cash flow from operations to meet our needs for working capital and to build a moderate level of cash reserves.
Policies Regarding Operating Expenses. Under our charter, we are required to limit our total operating expenses to the greater of 2% of our average invested assets or 25% of our net income for the four most recently completed fiscal quarters, as these terms are defined in our charter, unless the conflicts committee has determined that such excess expenses were justified based on unusual and non-recurring factors. Operating expenses for the four fiscal quarters ended December 31, 2021 did not exceed the charter-imposed limitation. For the four consecutive quarters ended December 31, 2021, total operating expenses represented approximately 0.9% and 25% of our average invested assets and our net income, respectively.
Policy Regarding Transactions with Related Persons
Our charter requires the conflicts committee to review and approve all transactions between us and our advisor, any of our officers or directors or any of their affiliates. Prior to entering into a transaction with a related party, a majority of the conflicts committee must conclude that the transaction is fair and reasonable to us. In addition, our Code of Conduct and Ethics lists examples of types of transactions with related parties that would create prohibited conflicts of interest and requires our officers and directors to be conscientious of actual and potential conflicts of interest with respect to our interests and to seek to avoid such conflicts or handle such conflicts in an ethical manner at all times consistent with applicable law. Our executive officers and directors are required to report potential and actual conflicts to the Compliance Officer, via the Ethics Hotline or directly to the audit committee chair, as appropriate.
Certain Transactions with Related Persons
The conflicts committee has reviewed the material transactions between our affiliates and us since the beginning of 2021 as well as any such currently proposed material transactions. Set forth below is a description of such transactions and the conflicts committee’s report on their fairness.
We have entered into agreements with certain affiliates pursuant to which they provide services to us. All of our executive officers and our affiliated director are also officers, directors, managers, or key professionals of and/or holders of a direct or indirect controlling interest in our advisor, KBS Capital Markets Group, and other affiliated KBS entities. Charles J. Schreiber, Jr. is the Chairman of our Board, our Chief Executive Officer, our President and our affiliated director. Our advisor and KBS Capital Markets Group are owned and controlled by KBS Holdings, our sponsor. Charles J. Schreiber, Jr. indirectly controls our sponsor and our advisor.
Our Relationship with KBS Capital Advisors. Since our inception, our advisor has provided day-to-day management of our business. Among the services that are provided or have been provided by our advisor under the terms of the advisory agreement are the following:
•finding, presenting and recommending to us investment opportunities consistent with our investment policies and objectives;
•structuring the terms and conditions of our investments, sales and joint ventures;
•acquiring properties and other investments on our behalf in compliance with our investment objectives and policies;
•sourcing and structuring our loan originations and acquisitions;
•arranging for financing and refinancing of our investments;
•entering into leases and service contracts for our properties;
•supervising and evaluating each property manager’s performance;
•reviewing and analyzing the properties’ operating and capital budgets;
•assisting us in obtaining insurance;
•generating an annual budget for us;
•reviewing and analyzing financial information for each of our assets and our overall portfolio;
•formulating and overseeing the implementation of strategies for the administration, promotion, management, operation, maintenance, improvement, financing and refinancing, marketing, leasing and disposition of our investments;
•performing investor-relations services;
•maintaining our accounting and other records and assisting us in filing all reports required to be filed with the SEC, the IRS and other regulatory agencies;
•engaging in and supervising the performance of our agents, including our registrar and transfer agent; and
•performing any other services reasonably requested by us.
Our advisor is subject to the supervision of the board of directors and only has such authority as we may delegate to it as our agent. The advisory agreement has a one-year term expiring September 27, 2022, subject to an unlimited number of successive one-year renewals upon the mutual consent of the parties. From January 1, 2021 through the most recent date practicable, which was February 28, 2022, we compensated our advisor as set forth below.
Our advisor or its affiliates have paid, and in the future may pay, some of the offering costs related to our dividend reinvestment plan, including, but not limited to, our legal, accounting, printing, mailing and filing fees. We are responsible for reimbursing our advisor for these costs. At the end of our dividend reinvestment plan offering, our advisor has agreed to reimburse us to the extent that organization and other offering expenses exceed 2% of gross offering proceeds. No reimbursements made by us to our advisor may cause total organization and offering expenses incurred by us to exceed 15% of the aggregate gross offering proceeds as of the date of reimbursement. From January 1, 2021 through February 28, 2022, with respect to our dividend reinvestment plan, our advisor did not incur any organization and offering expenses on our behalf.
We incur acquisition and origination fees payable to our advisor equal to 1.0% of the cost of investments acquired by us, or the amount to be funded by us to acquire or originate loans, including the sum of the amount actually paid or allocated to the purchase, development, construction or improvement of such investments, acquisition and origination expenses and any debt attributable to such investments. Acquisition and origination fees relate to services provided in connection with the selection and acquisition or origination of real estate investments. During the period from January 1, 2021 through February 28, 2022, we did not acquire any investments accounted for as a business combination and we did not purchase or originate any loans.
In addition to acquisition and origination fees, we reimburse our advisor for customary acquisition and origination expenses, whether or not we ultimately acquire the asset. From January 1, 2021 through February 28, 2022, our advisor and its affiliates did not incur any such costs on our behalf.
For asset management services, we pay our advisor a monthly fee. With respect to investments in real property, the asset management fee is a monthly fee equal to one-twelfth of 0.75% of the amount paid or allocated to acquire the investment, plus the cost of any subsequent development, construction or improvements to the property. This amount includes any portion of the investment that was debt financed and is inclusive of acquisition expenses related thereto (but excludes acquisition fees paid or payable to our advisor). In the case of investments made through joint ventures, the asset management fee is determined based on our proportionate share of the underlying investment (but excluding acquisition fees paid or payable to our advisor). With respect to investments in loans and any investments other than real property, the asset management fee is a monthly fee calculated, each month, as one-twelfth of 0.75% of the lesser of (i) the amount actually paid or allocated to acquire or fund the loan or other investment (which amount includes any portion of the investment that was debt financed and is inclusive of acquisition or origination expenses related thereto, but is exclusive of acquisition or origination fees paid or payable to our advisor) and (ii) the outstanding principal amount of such loan or other investment, plus the acquisition or origination expenses related to the acquisition or funding of such investment (excluding acquisition or origination fees paid or payable to our advisor), as of the time of calculation. We currently do not pay any asset management fees in connection with our investment in the equity securities of the SREIT.
However, with respect to asset management fees accruing from March 1, 2014, our advisor agreed to defer, without interest, our obligation to pay asset management fees for any month in which our modified funds from operations (“MFFO”) for such month, as such term is defined in the practice guideline issued by the IPA in November 2010 and interpreted by us, excluding asset management fees, does not exceed the amount of distributions declared by us for record dates of that month. We remain obligated to pay our advisor an asset management fee in any month in which our MFFO, excluding asset management fees, for such month exceeds the amount of distributions declared for the record dates of that month (such excess amount, an “MFFO Surplus”); however, any amount of such asset management fee in excess of the MFFO Surplus will also be deferred under the advisory agreement. If the MFFO Surplus for any month exceeds the amount of the asset management fee payable for such month, any remaining MFFO Surplus will be applied to pay any asset management fee amounts previously deferred in accordance with the advisory agreement.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, any and all deferred asset management fees that are unpaid will become immediately due and payable at such time as our stockholders have received, together as a collective group, aggregate distributions (including distributions that may constitute a return of capital for federal income tax purposes) sufficient to provide (i) an 8.0% per year cumulative, noncompounded return on such net invested capital (the “Stockholders’ 8% Return”) and (ii) a return of their net invested capital, or the amount calculated by multiplying the total number of shares purchased by stockholders by the issue price, reduced by any amounts to repurchase shares pursuant to our share redemption program. The Stockholders’ 8% Return is not based on the return provided to any individual stockholder. Accordingly, it is not necessary for each of our stockholders to have received any minimum return in order for our advisor to receive deferred asset management fees.
From January 1, 2021 through February 28, 2022, asset management fees totaled $23.0 million. From January 1, 2021 through February 28, 2022, we paid $21.5 million in asset management fees, $2.2 million of which related to asset management fees incurred in prior periods. As of February 28, 2022, we had accrued and deferred payment of $9.6 million of asset management fees under the advisory agreement. The amount of asset management fees deferred, if any, will vary on a month-to-month basis and the total amount of asset management fees deferred as well as the timing of the deferrals and repayments are difficult to predict as they will depend on the amount of and terms of any debt we use to acquire assets, the level of operating cash flow generated by our real estate investments, and the performance of all of the real estate investments in our portfolio and other factors. In addition, deferrals and repayments may occur in the same period, and it is possible that there could be additional deferrals in the future.
Under the advisory agreement, our advisor has the right to seek reimbursement from us for all costs and expenses it incurs in connection with the provision of services to us, including our allocable share of our advisor’s overhead, such as rent, employee costs, utilities, accounting software costs and cybersecurity costs. With respect to employee costs, at this time our advisor only expects to seek reimbursement for our allocable portion of the salaries, benefits and overhead of internal audit department personnel providing services to us. We currently do not reimburse our advisor for employee costs in connection with services for which our advisor earns acquisition or origination fees or disposition fees (other than reimbursement of travel and communication expenses) or for the salaries and benefits our advisor or its affiliates may pay to our executive officers.
From January 1, 2021 through February 28, 2022, we reimbursed our advisor for $607,000 of operating expenses (of which $73,000 was payable as of February 28, 2022), including $452,000 of our allocable portion of the salaries, benefits and overhead of internal audit department personnel providing services to us. We also reimburse our advisor for certain of our direct costs incurred from third parties that were initially paid by our advisor on behalf of us.
For substantial assistance in connection with the sale of properties or other investments, we pay our advisor or one of its affiliates 1.0% of the contract sales price of each property or other investment sold; provided, however, that if, in connection with such disposition, commissions are paid to third parties unaffiliated with our advisor or one of its affiliates, the fee paid to our advisor or one of its affiliates may not exceed the commissions paid to such unaffiliated third parties, and provided further that the aggregate disposition fees paid to our advisor or one of its affiliates and unaffiliated third parties may not exceed 6.0% of the contract sales price. We will not pay a disposition fee upon the maturity, prepayment or workout of a loan or other debt-related investment, provided that if we take ownership of a property as a result of a workout or foreclosure of a loan, we will pay a disposition fee upon the sale of such property. No disposition fees will be paid with respect to any sales of our investment in units of the SREIT. From January 1, 2021 through February 28, 2022, we sold two real estate properties and incurred $2.4 million of disposition fees, all of which had been paid as of February 28, 2022.
In connection with our initial public offering, Messrs. Bren and Schreiber and Keith D. Hall and Peter McMillan III agreed to provide additional indemnification to one of the participating broker-dealers. We agreed to add supplemental coverage to our directors’ and officers’ insurance coverage to insure the obligations of Messrs. Bren, Hall, McMillan and Schreiber under this indemnification agreement in exchange for reimbursement to us by Messrs. Bren, Hall, McMillan and Schreiber for all costs, expenses and premiums related to this supplemental coverage, which does not dilute the directors and officers liability insurance coverage for the KBS entities. From January 1, 2021 through February 28, 2022, our advisor had incurred $0.1 million for the costs of the supplemental coverage obtained by us, all of which had been paid to the insurer or reimbursed to us as of February 28, 2022.
As described under Part II, Item 9B, “Other Information,” our advisor has agreed to reimburse us both for any amounts inappropriately charged to us by certain vendors for services for which we believe we were either overcharged or which were never performed, and for the costs we incur in the audit committee’s joint investigation of this matter with the KBS REIT II audit committee. The joint audit committees’ investigation is ongoing. The reimbursement of these overpayments will be partially credited against asset management fees that were deferred in prior periods of $0.5 million that would have been due by us to our advisor in those periods as a result of the increase in our net income and MFFO for such periods, and corresponding decrease in expenses, related to the charges that we should not have incurred. The remainder of the reimbursement, $0.3 million, will be reimbursed to us in cash by our advisor.
The conflicts committee considers our relationship with our advisor, our sponsor and their affiliates during 2021 to be fair. The conflicts committee believes that the amounts payable to our advisor under the advisory agreement are similar to those paid by other publicly offered, unlisted, externally advised REITs and that this compensation is necessary in order for our advisor to provide the desired level of services to us and our stockholders.
Our Relationship with KBS Capital Markets Group. We continue to offer shares under our dividend reinvestment plan offering. From January 1, 2021 through February 28, 2022, with respect to our dividend reinvestment plan offering, we did not reimburse our dealer manager for any expenses related to our dividend reinvestment plan offering.
We entered into a fee reimbursement agreement with our dealer manager pursuant to which we agreed to reimburse our dealer manager for certain fees and expenses it incurs for administering our participation in the Depository Trust Clearing Corporation (“ DTCC”) Alternative Investment Product Platform with respect to certain accounts of our stockholders serviced through the platform. From January 1, 2021 through February 28, 2022, we incurred $76,000 of costs and expenses related to this agreement, of which $10,000 was payable as of February 28, 2022.
The conflicts committee believes that these arrangements with our dealer manager are fair. We believe that the compensation and reimbursements paid to our dealer manager have allowed us to achieve our goal of investing in a large, diversified portfolio of real estate investments.
Our Relationship with other KBS-Affiliated Entities. On May 29, 2015, our indirect wholly owned subsidiary that owns 3003 Washington Boulevard entered into a lease with an affiliate of our advisor for 5,046 rentable square feet, or approximately 2.4% of the total rentable square feet, at 3003 Washington Boulevard. The lease commenced on October 1, 2015 and had an initial termination date of August 31, 2019.
On March 14, 2019, the lessor entered into a First Amendment to Deed of Lease with the lessee to extend the lease period commencing on September 1, 2019 and terminating on August 31, 2024 (the “Amended Lease”) and set the annual base rent during the extension period. The annualized base rent from the commencement of the Amended Lease is approximately $0.3 million, and the average annual rental rate (net of rental abatements) over the term of the Amended Lease through its termination is $62.55 per square foot.
From January 1, 2021 through February 28, 2022, we recognized $380,000 of rental income related to the Amended Lease. Prior to their approval of the lease and the Amended Lease, our conflicts committee and board of directors determined the lease and the Amended Lease to be fair and reasonable to us.
Insurance Program. As of January 1, 2021, we, together with KBS REIT II, KBS Growth & Income REIT, our dealer manager, our advisor and other KBS-affiliated entities, had entered into an errors and omissions and directors and officers liability insurance program where the lower tiers of such insurance coverage were shared. The cost of these lower tiers is allocated by our advisor and its insurance broker among each of the various entities covered by the program, and is billed directly to each entity. In June 2021, we renewed our participation in the program. The program is effective through June 30, 2022. The conflicts committee believes the insurance program with our affiliates is fair.
Singapore Transaction. On July 18, 2019, we sold 11 of our properties (the “Singapore Portfolio”) to various subsidiaries of the SREIT, a Singapore real estate investment trust that listed on the SGX-ST (SGX-ST Ticker: OXMU) on July 19, 2019, and on July 19, 2019, we, through an indirect wholly owned subsidiary (“REIT Properties III”), acquired 307,953,999 units in the SREIT at a price of $0.88 per unit representing a 33.3% ownership interest in the SREIT (together, the “Singapore Transaction”). On August 21, 2019, REIT Properties III sold 18,392,100 of its units in the SREIT for $16.2 million pursuant to an over-allotment option granted to the underwriters of the SREIT’s offering, reducing REIT Properties III’s ownership in the SREIT to 31.3% of the outstanding units of the SREIT as of that date. On November 9, 2021, REIT Properties III sold 73,720,000 units in the SREIT for $58.9 million, net of fees and costs, pursuant to a block trade, reducing REIT Properties III’s ownership in the SREIT to 18.5% of the outstanding units of the SREIT as of that date. As of March 28, 2022, REIT Properties III held 215,841,899 units of the SREIT, which represented 18.4% of the outstanding units of the SREIT as of that date. As of March 28, 2022, the aggregate value of our investment in the units of the SREIT was $163.0 million, which was based solely on the closing price of the units on the SGX-ST of $0.755 per unit as of March 28, 2022, and did not take into account any potential discount for the holding period risk due to the quantity of units we hold.
The SREIT is affiliated with Charles J. Schreiber, Jr., one of our directors and executive officers. The SREIT is externally managed by an entity (the “Manager”) in which Charles J. Schreiber, Jr. currently holds an indirect ownership interest. Mr. Schreiber is also a former director of the Manager. The SREIT pays the Manager an annual base fee of 10% of annual distributable income and an annual performance fee of 25% of the increase in distributions per unit of the SREIT from the preceding year. For acquisitions other than the Singapore Portfolio, the SREIT pays the Manager an acquisition fee of 1% of the acquisition price. The SREIT will also pay the Manager a divestment fee of 0.5% of the sale price of any real estate sold and a development management fee of 3% of the total project costs incurred for development projects. A portion of the fees paid to the Manager are paid to KBS Realty Advisors, an entity controlled by Mr. Schreiber, for sub-advisory services. The Schreiber Trust, a trust whose beneficiaries are Charles J. Schreiber, Jr. and his family members, and the Linda Bren 2017 Trust also acquired units in the SREIT. The Schreiber Trust agreed it will not sell any portion of its units in the SREIT unless it has received the consent of our conflicts committee. The Linda Bren 2017 Trust has agreed it will not sell $5.0 million of its investment in the SREIT unless it has received the consent of our conflicts committee.
Also in connection with the Singapore Transaction, our advisor and KBS Realty Advisors proposed that our conflicts committee and board of directors adopt an Allocation Process among us, KBS REIT II, KBS Growth & Income REIT and the SREIT. The board of directors and conflicts committee adopted the Allocation Process as proposed. See above, “-Review of Our Policies - Acquisition and Investment Policies - Allocation Policy.”
The conflicts committee reviewed and approved the fairness of the Singapore Transaction and the conflicts committee believes that the Allocation Process with other KBS-affiliated entities is fair.
No Other Transactions. From January 1, 2021 through February 28, 2022, no other transactions occurred between us and KBS REIT II, KBS Growth & Income REIT, our dealer manager, our advisor or other KBS-affiliated entities.
Currently Proposed Transactions. There are no currently proposed material transactions with related persons other than those covered by the terms of the agreements described above and other than the proposed NAV REIT conversion discussed below.
Proposed NAV REIT Conversion
Our conflicts committee and our board of directors continue to evaluate various alternatives available to us, including whether or not to convert to a non-listed, perpetual-life “NAV REIT.” Our conflicts committee and board of directors remain focused on providing stable distributions and enhanced liquidity to stockholders. In the near term, while our conflicts committee and board of directors explore alternatives available to us, we may market certain of our assets for sale. Based on our assessment of alternatives available to us, market conditions and our further assessment of our capital raising prospects, our conflicts committee and board of directors may conclude that it would be in the best interest of our stockholders to (i) convert to an “NAV REIT,” (ii) continue to operate as a going concern under our current business plan, or (iii) adopt a plan of liquidation that would involve the sale of our remaining assets (in which event such plan would be presented to stockholders for approval). There is no assurance that any alternative being considered by our board of directors will provide a return to stockholders that equals or exceeds our estimated value per share as of November 1, 2021, and although we remain focused on providing enhanced liquidity to stockholders while maximizing returns to stockholders, we can provide no assurances in this regard. We also can provide no assurances as to whether or when any alternative being considered by our board of directors will be consummated.
We refer to an “NAV REIT” as a non-listed, perpetual-life company that (a) calculates the net asset value or “NAV” per share on a regular basis that is more frequent than annually (i.e., daily, monthly or quarterly), (b) offers and sells new shares of common stock continuously through a number of distribution channels in ongoing public offerings, and (c) seeks to provide increased liquidity to current and future stockholders through an expanded share redemption program and/or periodic self-tender offers. We refer to our proposed conversion to this mode of operation as the “Proposed NAV REIT Conversion.” On January 9, 2020, we filed a definitive proxy statement with the SEC in connection with the annual meeting of stockholders to vote on, among other proposals, two proposals related to our pursuit of conversion to an NAV REIT, both of which were approved by our stockholders at our annual meeting of stockholders on May 7, 2020. Also in connection with our pursuit of conversion to an NAV REIT, on January 10, 2020, we filed a registration statement on Form S-11 with the SEC to register a public offering. Pursuant to the registration statement and in the event we convert to an NAV REIT, we propose to register up to $2,000,000,000 of shares of common stock, consisting of up to $1,700,000,000 in shares in a primary offering and up to $300,000,000 in shares pursuant to a dividend reinvestment plan. See Part I, Item 1A, “Risk Factors - Risks of the Proposed NAV REIT Conversion.”
Terms of Proposed NAV REIT Conversion
We summarize below the principal terms of the Proposed NAV REIT Conversion. Our board of directors may change any aspect of these terms without stockholder approval, except the specific matters submitted for stockholder approval. Such changes may be deemed appropriate for a variety of reasons, including but not limited to regulatory, capital-raising or business considerations, all of which can change over time.
More Frequent NAV Calculations
Since May 2014, we have historically calculated the NAV of our shares at least once each calendar year. If we convert to an NAV REIT, we currently intend to calculate our NAV once per month, though we could decide to calculate it daily or quarterly. We believe more frequent NAV calculations will improve our ability to offer and repurchase our shares at the most representative prices, and also improve visibility and transparency into our performance.
Revised Share Redemption Program
If we convert to an NAV REIT, we believe we can (a) offer an expanded share redemption program, (b) have additional capital to fund redemptions, and (c) provide more frequent NAV per share calculations, which will provide stockholders with more information when making liquidity decisions and also allow more frequent and representative pricing under our share redemption program. If we convert to an NAV REIT, we intend to revise our share redemption program to allow us to make monthly redemptions with an aggregate value of up to 5% of our NAV per calendar quarter. This would be a significant increase in maximum capacity compared to our current share redemption program, which limits redemptions of shares during any calendar year to no more than 5% of the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the prior calendar year. Our current share redemption program is also limited by funding restrictions that prevent us from redeeming the maximum number of shares permitted under the program, unless increased by our board of directors. Because the actual level of redemptions under our share redemption program as an NAV REIT would also depend on our ability to fund redemptions and our other capital needs, we may not be able to make redemptions up to the maximum capacity permitted by the program. However, our intention is to increase our stockholders’ access to liquidity through an expansion of our current share redemption program and/or through self-tender offers. As an NAV REIT, we expect that redemptions would be made on a monthly basis at a price generally equal to the prior month’s NAV per share for the class of stock (which will be our most recently disclosed NAV per share at such time) with two exceptions: (i) shares that have not been outstanding for at least one year will be redeemed at 96.0% of the prior month’s NAV per share for the class of stock (an “Early Redemption Deduction”) and (ii) all shares that are redeemed during the first year after our conversion to an NAV REIT will be redeemed at 96.0% of the prior month’s NAV per share for the class of stock (“Transition Deduction”). Subject to limited exceptions, the Early Redemption Deduction and Transition Deduction may only be waived in the case of redemption requests arising from the death or qualified disability of the holder.
Distributions and Dividend Reinvestment Plan
Commencing in January 2019 and other than special distributions, our distributions have been based on monthly record dates. As an NAV REIT, we expect that we would continue to pay distributions based on monthly record dates. We expect to revise our dividend reinvestment plan so that we would generally sell shares at our prior month’s NAV per share for the class of stock (which will be our most recently disclosed NAV per share at such time), rather than at 95% of the most recent NAV as we do now.
Ongoing Public Offerings Conducted through KBS Capital Markets Group LLC
As an NAV REIT, we expect that we would conduct ongoing primary public offerings of our shares on a continuous basis through an affiliated dealer manager. Such offerings would likely include new classes of common stock, which would allow us to offer different classes of common stock with different combinations of upfront and ongoing commissions and other fees payable to our dealer manager and participating broker-dealers. We believe that having a number of different share classes with different distribution compensation structures will improve our ability to sell shares and raise capital in the current market.
We generally expect that the upfront and ongoing commissions and other fees payable to our dealer manager and participating broker-dealers in connection with these offerings would be borne by the new investors. We would also incur other offering expenses in connection with these offerings, which expenses would impact all stockholders. These other offering expenses would include, among other items, our legal, accounting, printing, mailing, subscription processing and filing fees and expenses, costs in connection with preparing sales materials, design and website expenses, charges of our transfer agent, reimbursement of bona fide due diligence expenses, legal fees of our dealer manager, costs reimbursement for registered representatives of participating broker-dealers to attend educational conferences sponsored by us or our dealer manager, attendance fees for registered persons associated with our dealer manager to attend seminars conducted by participating broker-dealers, and promotional items. They could also include reimbursement to our dealer manager for wholesaling compensation expenses, though we do not currently intend to reimburse our dealer manager for such expenses.
Revised Advisory Fee Structure
•Acquisition and Origination Fees. Pursuant to our advisory agreement currently in effect with our advisor, we incur acquisition and origination fees payable to our advisor equal to 1.0% of the cost of investments acquired by us, or the amount to be funded by us to acquire or originate loans, including the sum of the amount actually paid or allocated to the purchase, development, construction or improvement of such investments, acquisition and origination expenses and any debt attributable to such investments. We intend to eliminate this fee as part of the Proposed NAV REIT Conversion. This may represent significant savings, depending on our future investment activity.
•Acquisition, Origination and Disposition Expenses. We intend to continue to reimburse our advisor for customary acquisition, origination and disposition expenses, whether or not we ultimately acquire or dispose of the asset. We currently do not reimburse our advisor for employee costs in connection with services for which our advisor earns acquisition or origination fees or disposition fees (other than reimbursement of travel and communication expenses) or for the salaries and benefits our advisor or its affiliates may pay to our executive officers. Subject to the limitations in our charter and the advisory agreement, if we convert to an NAV REIT, we will reimburse our advisor for costs and expenses paid or incurred by our advisor or its affiliates in connection with the selection, evaluation, structuring, acquisition, financing, development and disposition of investments, whether or not such investments are acquired or disposed of, and we will make payments to third parties in connection with providing services to us. Such cost and expense reimbursements to our advisor include personnel and related employment costs, such as reasonable salaries and wages, benefits and overhead of employees directly involved in the performance of the services as well as payments made to third parties on our behalf. We will not reimburse our advisor for the salaries and benefits our advisor or its affiliates may pay our executive officers.
•Fixed Asset Management Fee. Pursuant to our advisory agreement currently in effect with our advisor, we currently pay the advisor an asset management fee. With respect to investments in real property, the asset management fee is a monthly fee equal to one-twelfth of 0.75% of the sum of the amount paid or allocated to acquire the investment, plus the costs of any subsequent development, construction or improvements to the property. This amount includes any portion of the investment that was debt financed and is inclusive of acquisition expenses related thereto (but excludes acquisition fees paid or payable to our advisor). In the case of investments made through joint ventures, the asset management fee is determined based on our proportionate share of the underlying investment (but excluding acquisition fees paid or payable to our advisor). With respect to investments in loans and any investments other than real property, the asset management fee is a monthly fee calculated, each month, as one-twelfth of 0.75% of the lesser of (i) the amount actually paid or allocated to acquire or fund the loan or other investment (which amount includes any portion of the investment that was debt financed and is inclusive of acquisition or origination expenses related thereto, but is exclusive of acquisition or origination fees paid or payable to our advisor) and (ii) the outstanding principal amount of such loan or other investment, plus the acquisition or origination expenses related to the acquisition or funding of such investment (excluding acquisition or origination fees paid or payable to our advisor), as of the time of calculation. As discussed above, from January 1, 2021 through February 28, 2022, asset management fees totaled $23.0 million. From January 1, 2021 through February 28, 2022, we paid $21.5 million in asset management fees, $2.2 million of which related to asset management fees incurred in prior periods. As of February 28, 2022, we had accrued and deferred payment of $9.6 million of asset management fees under the advisory agreement.
With respect to our current asset management fee, our advisor has agreed to defer, without interest, our obligation to pay asset management fees for any month in which our modified funds from operations (“MFFO”) for such month, as such term is defined in the practice guideline issued by the IPA in November 2010 and interpreted by us, excluding asset management fees, does not exceed the amount of distributions declared by us for record dates of that month. We remain obligated to pay our advisor an asset management fee in any month in which our MFFO, excluding asset management fees, for such month exceeds the amount of distributions declared for the record dates of that month (such excess amount, an “MFFO Surplus”); however, any amount of such asset management fee in excess of the MFFO Surplus will also be deferred under the advisory agreement. If the MFFO Surplus for any month exceeds the amount of the asset management fee payable for such month, any remaining MFFO Surplus will be applied to pay any asset management fee amounts previously deferred in accordance with the advisory agreement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, any and all deferred asset management fees that are unpaid will become immediately due and payable at such time as our stockholders have received, together as a collective group, aggregate distributions (including distributions that may constitute a return of capital for federal income tax purposes) sufficient to provide (i) an 8.0% per year cumulative, noncompounded return on such net invested capital (the “Stockholders’ 8% Return”) and (ii) a return of their net invested capital, or the amount calculated by multiplying the total number of shares purchased by stockholders by the issue price, reduced by any amounts to repurchase shares pursuant to our share redemption program. The Stockholders’ 8% Return is not based on the return provided to any individual stockholder. Accordingly, it is not necessary for each of our stockholders to have received any minimum return in order for our advisor to receive deferred asset management fees.
If we convert to an NAV REIT, we currently expect to replace the current asset management fee with a fixed management fee equal to 1.25% of our NAV per annum payable monthly. Additionally, to the extent that our operating partnership, KBS Limited Partnership III (the “Operating Partnership”), issues Operating Partnership units to parties other than us, our Operating Partnership will pay our adviser or its affiliate a management fee equal to 1.25% of the NAV of the Operating Partnership attributable to such Operating Partnership units not held by us per annum payable monthly. In calculating the management fee, we intend to use our NAV and the NAV of the Operating Partnership units not held by us before giving effect to monthly accruals for the management fee and the performance participation allocation fee (described below), ongoing fees paid to our dealer manager (all or a portion of which will be paid or reallowed to broker-dealers) with respect to new sales of shares (i.e., ongoing class-specific fees), or distributions payable on our outstanding shares or Operating Partnership units.
The impact of this change will depend on a number of factors, including our leverage and the value of our assets compared to the purchase price (both of which will be taken into account with the new fee structure, unlike the old fee structure), and is therefore impossible to predict over the long term, but we do not expect the change to be significant in the near term. By way of example only, if the aggregate NAV of our company for the year ended December 31, 2021 were equal to the estimated net asset value of our company as of September 30, 2021, adjusted to give effect to (i) the change in the estimated value of our investment in units of the SREIT as of October 22, 2021 and (ii) the contractual sales price less estimated disposition costs and fees of one property that was under contract to sell as of November 1, 2021, calculated in accordance with the estimated value per share approved by our board of directors on November 1, 2021 and then adjusted to exclude the value of our investment in units of the SREIT of $227.3 million as of October 22, 2021, which currently is not subject to an asset management fee, this new fixed management fee would have been approximately $1.5 million per month. By comparison, the existing asset management fee incurred by us for the year ended December 31, 2021 was approximately $1.7 million per month.
The new management fee will not be subject to the deferrals described above with respect to our current asset management fee. This could result in the advisor or its affiliate receiving management fees sooner than it otherwise would under our current asset management fee arrangement, depending on our MFFO relative to our distributions.
The new management fee may be paid, at our advisor’s election, in cash, shares of our common stock or units of our Operating Partnership. If our advisor elects to receive any portion of its management fee in shares of our common stock or units of our Operating Partnership, we may be obligated to repurchase such shares or units from our advisor at a later date, at our advisor’s election. Such repurchases will be outside of our share redemption program and thus will not be subject to the redemption limits of our share redemption program (except as described below) or any Early Redemption Deduction or Transition Deduction. To the extent that our advisor elects to receive any portion of its management fee in shares of our common stock, we will repurchase such shares (including any shares issued in a dividend reinvestment plan or issued as a stock dividend related thereto) from our advisor, at our advisor’s election, unless such repurchase would both (i) when combined with any redemption requests submitted by stockholders through our share redemption program, cause our aggregate redemptions for such month to exceed 2% of our aggregate NAV as of the last day of the previous calendar month or, in any calendar quarter, cause our aggregate redemptions for such quarter to exceed 5% of our aggregate NAV as of the last day of the previous calendar quarter and (ii) in the sole determination of the conflicts committee, materially adversely affect our liquidity or financial condition. The Operating Partnership will repurchase any such Operating Partnership units for cash unless our board of directors determines that any such repurchase for cash would be prohibited by applicable law, our charter or the Operating Partnership Agreement, in which case such Operating Partnership units will be repurchased for shares of our common stock with an equivalent aggregate NAV, and our advisor may elect to have us repurchase such shares, subject to the limitations of the immediately preceding sentence. The advisory agreement will provide that with respect to any shares of our common stock received as payment for the new management fee, within six months after a listing of the shares on a national securities exchange, we will enter into a registration rights agreement with our advisor for the shares received as payment for the new management fee, with terms mutually agreeable to us and our advisor.
•Incentive Fee. Please see “Revised Incentive Fee” below for a description of our current intentions with respect to the incentive fee payable to our advisor or its affiliate.
•Disposition Fees. Pursuant to our advisory agreement currently in effect with the advisor, for substantial assistance in connection with the sale of properties or other investments, we currently pay our advisor or its affiliates 1.0% of the contract sales price of each property or other investment sold; provided, however, that if in connection with such disposition commissions are paid to third parties unaffiliated with our advisor, the fee paid to our advisor and its affiliates may not exceed the commissions paid to such unaffiliated third parties, and provided further that the disposition fees paid to our advisor, its affiliates and unaffiliated third parties may not exceed 6.0% of the contract sales price.
We intend to eliminate this fee as part of the Proposed NAV REIT Conversion.
•Operating Expenses. Pursuant to our advisory agreement currently in effect with the advisor, subject to the limitations in our charter and the advisory agreement, our advisor has the right to seek reimbursement from us for all costs and expenses paid or incurred by our advisor or its affiliates in connection with providing services to us, including our allocable share of our advisor’s overhead, such as rent, personnel and related employment costs (including reasonable salaries and wages, benefits and overhead of employees directly involved in the performance of such services), utilities, accounting software costs and cybersecurity costs. We currently reimburse our advisor for our allocable portion of the salaries, benefits and overhead of internal audit department personnel providing services to us. In the future, our advisor may seek reimbursement for additional employee costs. We will not reimburse our advisor for the salaries and benefits our advisor or its affiliates may pay our executive officers. In addition, we reimburse our advisor for certain of our direct costs incurred from third parties that were initially paid by our advisor on our behalf. See also “Acquisition, Origination and Disposition Expenses” above.
We have also entered into a fee reimbursement agreement with KBS Capital Markets Group pursuant to which we agreed to reimburse our dealer manager for certain fees and expenses it incurs for administering our participation in the DTCC Alternative Investment Product Platform with respect to certain accounts of our investors serviced through the platform.
Revised Incentive Fee
Description of Current Incentive Fee
Pursuant to our advisory agreement currently in effect with the advisor, the advisor is due a subordinated participation in our net cash flows (the “Subordinated Participation in Net Cash Flows”) upon meeting certain performance goals. After our stockholders have received, together as a collective group, aggregate distributions (including distributions that may constitute a return of capital for federal income tax purposes) sufficient to provide (i) a return of their net invested capital, or the amount calculated by multiplying the total number of shares purchased by stockholders by the issue price, reduced by any amounts to repurchase shares pursuant to our share redemption program, and (ii) an 8.0% per year cumulative, noncompounded return on such net invested capital, the advisor is entitled to receive 15.0% of our net cash flows, whether from continuing operations, net sale proceeds or otherwise. Net sales proceeds means the net cash proceeds realized by us after deduction of all expenses incurred in connection with a sale, including disposition fees paid to the advisor. The 8.0% per year cumulative, noncompounded return on net invested capital is calculated on a daily basis. In making this calculation, the net invested capital is reduced to the extent distributions in excess of a cumulative, noncompounded, annual return of 8.0% are paid (from whatever source), except to the extent such distributions would be required to supplement prior distributions paid in order to achieve a cumulative, noncompounded, annual return of 8.0% (invested capital is only reduced as described in this sentence; it is not reduced simply because a distribution constitutes a return of capital for federal income tax purposes). The 8.0% per year cumulative, noncompounded return is not based on the return provided to any individual stockholder. Accordingly, it is not necessary for each of our stockholders to have received any minimum return in order for our advisor to participate in our net cash flows. In fact, if the advisor is entitled to participate in our net cash flows, the returns of our stockholders will differ, and some may be less than an 8.0% per year cumulative, noncompounded return. This fee is payable only if we are not listed on an exchange.
Alternatively, pursuant to our advisory agreement currently in effect with the advisor, the advisor is due a subordinated incentive listing fee (the “Subordinated Participation Listing Fee”) upon a listing of our common stock on a national securities exchange equal to 15.0% of the amount by which (i) the market value of our outstanding stock plus distributions paid by us (including distributions that may constitute a return of capital for federal income tax purposes) prior to listing exceeds (ii) the sum of our stockholders’ net invested capital, or the amount calculated by multiplying the total number of shares purchased by stockholders by the issue price, reduced by any amounts to repurchase shares pursuant to our share redemption program, and the amount of cash flow necessary to generate an 8.0% per year cumulative, noncompounded return on such amount. The 8.0% per year cumulative, noncompounded return on net invested capital is calculated on a daily basis. In making this calculation, the net invested capital is reduced to the extent distributions in excess of a cumulative, noncompounded, annual return of 8.0% are paid (from whatever source), except to the extent such distributions would be required to supplement prior distributions paid in order to achieve a cumulative, noncompounded, annual return of 8.0% (invested capital is only reduced as described in this sentence; it is not reduced simply because a distribution constitutes a return of capital for federal income tax purposes). The 8.0% per year cumulative, noncompounded return is not based on the return provided to any individual stockholder. Accordingly, it is not necessary for each of our stockholders to have received any minimum return in order for our advisor to receive the listing fee. In fact, if our advisor is entitled to the listing fee, the returns of our stockholders will differ, and some may be less than an 8.0% per year cumulative, noncompounded return.
Neither the Subordinated Participation in Net Cash Flows nor the Subordinated Participation Listing Fee are currently payable to our advisor, and there is no guarantee that they will ever be payable. Most likely, we would need to list our shares on a national securities exchange or liquidate substantially all of our assets for one of these fees to be payable, and we would have to have met the requisite threshold for payment of the fee. Solely for purposes of determining the estimated net asset value of our company as of September 30, 2021, adjusted to give effect to (i) the change in the estimated value of our investment in units of the SREIT as of October 22, 2021 and (ii) the contractual sales price less estimated disposition costs and fees of one property that was under contract to sell as of November 1, 2021, calculated in accordance with the estimated value per share approved by our board of directors on November 1, 2021, our advisor determined that there would be no liability related to the Subordinated Participation in Net Cash Flows at that time, based on a hypothetical liquidation of the assets and liabilities at their estimated fair values, after considering the impact of any potential closing costs and fees related to the disposition of real estate properties; however, changes to the fair values of assets and liabilities could have a material impact to the incentive fee calculation.
Reasons for Proposing Changes to Incentive Fee Structure
The triggering events for the incentive fee structure currently in effect with our advisor are generally expected to occur, if ever, upon a listing of our shares of stock on a national securities exchange or a significant distribution of cash in connection with a sale of all or a substantial amount of our assets. These triggering events are inconsistent with a perpetual-life NAV REIT that intends to provide liquidity to its stockholders through a share redemption program and/or periodic self-tender offers. Therefore, in order to properly align our advisor’s and its affiliates’ incentive fee compensation structure with our proposed perpetual-life strategy, we intend to revise the incentive fee structure. Commencing with the launch of our first public offering as a perpetual-life NAV REIT, we intend to implement an annual incentive fee formula that would require us to pay our advisor (or its affiliate) an incentive fee for any given year if certain performance thresholds were met for that year. With respect to our historical performance period from inception through the launch of our first public offering as a perpetual-life NAV REIT, we believe it is appropriate to calculate the estimated value of the Subordinated Participation in Net Cash Flows based on a hypothetical liquidation of our assets and liabilities at their then-current estimated values used in our NAV calculation at the time of conversion to an NAV REIT, after considering the impact of any potential closing costs and fees related to the disposition of real estate properties, and accelerate the payment of the historical incentive fee to our advisor to the extent of the potential liability at the time of conversion to an NAV REIT. Because the acceleration of this fee is not something we intended to do when we launched our initial public offering, we asked our stockholders for their approval of this acceleration, which our stockholders approved at our annual meeting of stockholders on May 7, 2020. As noted above, our conflicts committee and our board of directors continue to evaluate various alternatives available to us, including whether or not to convert to a non-listed, perpetual-life “NAV REIT.” We can provide no assurances as to whether or when any alternative being considered by our board of directors will be consummated.
Proposed Acceleration of Payment of Current Incentive Fee
If we convert to an NAV REIT, upon conversion, we currently intend to calculate the estimated value of the Subordinated Participation in Net Cash Flows based on a hypothetical liquidation of our assets and liabilities at their then-current estimated values used in our NAV calculation at the time of conversion to an NAV REIT, after considering the impact of any potential closing costs and fees related to the disposition of real estate properties, and accelerate the payment of the historical incentive fee to our advisor to the extent of the potential liability at the time of conversion to an NAV REIT. Following this calculation and acceleration of this payment to the extent of the potential liability, our obligation to pay the Subordinated Participation in Net Cash Flows and the Subordinated Participation Listing Fee would be eliminated.
We expect any acceleration payment would be made in the form of restricted shares of our common stock (“Restricted Shares”) with terms that are still under consideration, but are currently expected to be structured as follows:
•Each Restricted Share would be one share of our common stock.
•The Restricted Shares would be awarded in connection with the launch of a public offering as an NAV REIT.
•The number of Restricted Shares awarded would equal the number of our shares of common stock, valued at the then-current NAV per share at the time of the award (i.e., the NAV per share at the time of our conversion to an NAV REIT), with a value equal to the estimated value of the Subordinated Participation in Net Cash Flows based on a hypothetical liquidation of our assets and liabilities at their then-current estimated values used in the NAV calculation at the time of conversion to an NAV REIT, after considering the impact of any potential closing costs and fees related to the disposition of real estate properties. The foregoing would be calculated by our advisor (or its affiliate) in its good faith and approved by the conflicts committee.
•The Restricted Shares awarded would vest after two years, provided the advisor or its affiliate is not terminated for “cause” during that time (where “cause” means fraud, criminal conduct if the advisor or its affiliate would have reasonable cause to believe that the conduct was unlawful, willful misconduct, or an uncured material breach of the advisory agreement). Both we and the advisor would have certain rights to accelerate vesting in certain situations, such as a change of control of our company.
•We would agree with the advisor prior to the award of the Restricted Shares to repurchase 50% of the Restricted Shares upon vesting, with the repurchase price determined based on the then-current value of our shares. The main reason we would agree to repurchase 50% of the Restricted Shares upon vesting is to allow the advisor to have cash to pay its taxes.
•The Restricted Shares would be entitled to dividends and have the same voting rights as all other shares of common stock.
•After vesting and excluding the initial repurchase of 50% of the Restricted Shares upon vesting, the shares the advisor receives pursuant to this agreement would not be eligible for redemption under our share redemption program unless the company has satisfied all redemption requests from other stockholders received at that time; this restriction may be lifted in certain situations, such as upon a change of control of our company.
Under our charter, we are required to limit our total operating expenses to the greater of 2% of our average invested assets or 25% of our net income for the four most recently completed fiscal quarters, as these terms are defined in our charter, unless the conflicts committee has determined that such excess expenses were justified based on unusual and non-recurring factors. Because the award of Restricted Shares would be deemed an operating expense under our charter, such award may cause us to exceed the charter limitation on total operating expenses. We expect that any agreement to award Restricted Shares to our advisor would provide that (i) the conflicts committee has determined that the expense to us as a result of such award is justified based on unusual and non-recurring factors and (ii) the advisor will not be required to reimburse us any expenses under this charter provision to the extent that we exceed the limit on total operating expenses as a result of the expense incurred in connection with the award of Restricted Shares. Though the award of Restricted Shares is an expense under our charter and generally accepted accounting principles, the award would not reduce our cash flow from operations.
Proposed Incentive Fee Going Forward
In addition, if we convert to an NAV REIT, we currently intend to replace the incentive fees described above with a new annual performance allocation. We expect that the advisor or one of its affiliates (the “Special Limited Partner”) will own a special limited partner interest in the Operating Partnership. So long as the advisory agreement with our advisor or its affiliate has not been terminated (including by means of non-renewal), the Special Limited Partner will hold a performance participation interest in the Operating Partnership that will entitle it to receive an allocation from our Operating Partnership equal to 12.5% of the Total Return, subject to a 6% Hurdle Amount and a High Water Mark, with a partial Catch-Up (each term as defined below). Such allocation will be made annually and accrue monthly.
Specifically, the Special Limited Partner will be allocated a performance participation in an amount equal to:
•First, if the Total Return for the applicable period exceeds the sum of (i) the Hurdle Amount for that period and (ii) the Loss Carryforward Amount (any such excess, “Excess Profits”), 100% of such Excess Profits until the total amount allocated to the Special Limited Partner equals 5.0% of the sum of (x) the Hurdle Amount for that period and (y) any amount allocated to the Special Limited Partner pursuant to this clause (this is commonly referred to as a “Catch-Up”); and
•Second, to the extent there are remaining Excess Profits, 12.5% of such remaining Excess Profits.
“Total Return” for any period since the end of the prior calendar year shall equal the sum of:
(i)all distributions accrued or paid (without duplication) on the Operating Partnership units outstanding at the end of such period since the beginning of the then-current calendar year plus
(ii)the change in aggregate NAV of such units since the beginning of the year, before giving effect to (x) changes resulting solely from the proceeds of issuances of Operating Partnership units, (y) any allocation/accrual to the performance participation interest and (z) applicable distribution fee expenses (including any payments made to us for payment of such expenses).
For the avoidance of doubt, the calculation of Total Return will (i) include any appreciation or depreciation in the NAV of units issued during the then-current calendar year but (ii) exclude the proceeds from the initial issuance of such units.
“Hurdle Amount” for any period during a calendar year means that amount that results in a 6% annualized internal rate of return on the NAV of the Operating Partnership units outstanding at the beginning of the then-current calendar year and all Operating Partnership units issued since the beginning of the then-current calendar year, taking into account the timing and amount of all distributions accrued or paid (without duplication) on all such units and all issuances of Operating Partnership units over the period and calculated in accordance with recognized industry practices. The ending NAV of the Operating Partnership units used in calculating the internal rate of return will be calculated before giving effect to any allocation/accrual to the performance participation interest and applicable distribution fee expenses, provided that the calculation of the Hurdle Amount for any period will exclude any Operating Partnership units repurchased during such period, which units will be subject to the performance participation allocation upon repurchase as described below.
Except as described in Loss Carryforward Amount below, any amount by which Total Return falls below the Hurdle Amount will not be carried forward to subsequent periods.
“Loss Carryforward Amount” shall initially equal zero and shall cumulatively increase by the absolute value of any negative annual Total Return and decrease by any positive annual Total Return, provided that the Loss Carryforward Amount shall at no time be less than zero and provided further that the calculation of the Loss Carryforward Amount will exclude the Total Return related to any Operating Partnership units repurchased during such year, which units will be subject to the performance participation allocation upon repurchase as described below. The effect of the Loss Carryforward Amount is that the recoupment of past annual Total Return losses will offset the positive annual Total Return for purposes of the calculation of the Special Limited Partner’s performance participation. This is referred to as a “High Water Mark.”
The Special Limited Partner will also be allocated a performance participation with respect to all Operating Partnership units that are repurchased at the end of any month (in connection with redemptions or repurchases of our shares in our share redemption program or otherwise) in an amount calculated as described above with the relevant period being the portion of the year for which such unit was outstanding, and proceeds for any such unit repurchase will be reduced by the amount of any such performance participation.
Distributions on the performance participation interest may be payable in cash or units of our Operating Partnership at the election of the Special Limited Partner. If the Special Limited Partner elects to receive such distributions in Operating Partnership units, the Special Limited Partner may request the Operating Partnership to repurchase such Operating Partnership units from the Special Limited Partner at a later date. Any such repurchase requests will not be subject to the Early Repurchase Deduction or Transition Deduction but will be subject to the same redemption limits that exist under our share redemption program.
The Operating Partnership will repurchase any such Operating Partnership units for cash unless our board of directors determines that any such repurchase for cash would be prohibited by applicable law, our charter or the Operating Partnership agreement, in which case such Operating Partnership units will be repurchased for shares of our common stock with an equivalent aggregate NAV. The Operating Partnership agreement will provide that with respect to any shares of our common stock issued to the Special Limited Partner or our advisor upon the repurchase of Operating Partnership units, within six months after a listing of the shares on a national securities exchange, we will enter into a registration rights agreement with the Special Limited Partner and our advisor for these shares, with terms mutually agreeable to us, the Special Limited Partner and our advisor.
In our first calendar year of operations as an NAV REIT, the performance participation will be prorated for the portion of the calendar year in which we operate as an NAV REIT.
The measurement of the foregoing net assets change is also subject to adjustment by our board of directors to account for any unit dividend, unit split, recapitalization or any other similar change in the Operating Partnership’s capital structure or any distributions made after our conversion to an NAV REIT that the board of directors deems to be a return of capital (if such changes are not already reflected in the Operating Partnership’s net assets).
The Special Limited Partner will not be obligated to return any portion of the performance participation paid based on our subsequent performance.
Changes in our Operating Partnership’s NAV per unit of each class will generally correspond to changes in our NAV per share of the corresponding class of our common stock. Distributions with respect to the performance participation interest are calculated from the Operating Partnership’s Total Return over a calendar year. As a result, the Special Limited Partner may be entitled to receive compensation under the performance participation for a given year even if some of our stockholders who purchased shares during such year experienced a decline in NAV per share. Similarly, stockholders whose shares are repurchased during a given year may have their shares repurchased at a lower NAV per share as a result of an accrual for the estimated performance participation at such time, even if no performance participation allocation for such year is ultimately payable to the Special Limited Partner at the end of such calendar year.
In the event the advisory agreement is terminated, the Special Limited Partner will be allocated any accrued performance participation with respect to all Operating Partnership units as of the date of such termination.
Conflicts Committee Determination
The conflicts committee has examined the fairness of the transactions described above, and has determined that all such transactions are fair and reasonable to us. The conflicts committee has also determined that the policies set forth in this Report of the Conflicts Committee are in the best interests of our stockholders because they provide us with the highest likelihood of achieving our investment objectives.
March 31, 2022 The Conflicts Committee of the Board of Directors:
Jeffrey A. Dritley (chair), Stuart A. Gabriel, Ph.D. and Ron D. Sturzenegger

---

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
During the year ended December 31, 2021, Ernst & Young LLP served as our independent registered public accounting firm and provided certain tax and other services. Ernst & Young has served as our independent registered public accounting firm since our formation.
Pre-Approval Policies
In order to ensure that the provision of such services does not impair the independent registered public accounting firm’s independence, the audit committee charter imposes a duty on the audit committee to pre-approve all auditing services performed for us by our independent registered public accounting firm, as well as all permitted non-audit services. In determining whether or not to pre-approve services, the audit committee considers whether the service is a permissible service under the rules and regulations promulgated by the SEC. The audit committee may, in its discretion, delegate to one or more of its members the authority to pre-approve any audit or non-audit services to be performed by our independent registered public accounting firm, provided any such approval is presented to and approved by the full audit committee at its next scheduled meeting.
For the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, all services rendered by Ernst & Young were pre-approved in accordance with the policies and procedures described above.
Principal Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Fees
The audit committee reviewed the audit and non-audit services performed by Ernst & Young, as well as the fees charged by Ernst & Young for such services. In its review of the non-audit service fees, the audit committee considered whether the provision of such services is compatible with maintaining the independence of Ernst & Young. The aggregate fees billed to us for professional accounting services, including the audit of our annual financial statements by Ernst & Young for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, are set forth in the table below.
2021 2020
Audit fees $ 778,500 $ 747,500
Audit-related fees - -
Tax fees 163,558 160,396
All other fees 2,400 2,300
Total $ 944,458 $ 910,196
For purposes of the preceding table, Ernst & Young’s professional fees are classified as follows:
•Audit fees - These are fees for professional services performed for the audit of our annual financial statements and the required review of quarterly financial statements and other procedures performed by Ernst & Young in order for them to be able to form an opinion on our consolidated financial statements. These fees also cover services that are normally provided by independent registered public accounting firms in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements.
•Audit-related fees - These are fees for assurance and related services that traditionally are performed by independent registered public accounting firms that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of our financial statements, such as due diligence related to acquisitions and dispositions, attestation services that are not required by statute or regulation, internal control reviews and consultation concerning financial accounting and reporting standards.
•Tax fees - These are fees for all professional services performed by professional staff in our independent registered public accounting firm’s tax division, except those services related to the audit of our financial statements. These include fees for tax compliance, tax planning and tax advice, including federal, state and local issues. Services may also include assistance with tax audits and appeals before the U.S. Internal Revenue Service and similar state and local agencies, as well as federal, state and local tax issues related to due diligence.
•All other fees - These are fees for any services not included in the above-described categories.
PART IV

---

ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
(a)Financial Statement Schedules
See the Index to Financial Statements at page of this report.
The following financial statement schedule is included herein at pages through of this report:
Schedule III - Real Estate Assets and Accumulated Depreciation and Amortization
(b)Exhibits
Ex. Description
3.1 Second Articles of Amendment and Restatement, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed January 25, 2011
3.2 Third Amended and Restated Bylaws, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2020, filed November 16, 2020
4.1 Statement regarding restrictions on transferability of shares of common stock (to appear on stock certificate or to be sent upon request and without charge to stockholders issued shares without certificates), incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Pre-Effective Amendment No. 2 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-11, Commission File No. 333-164703, filed August 20, 2010
4.2 Fourth Amended and Restated Dividend Reinvestment Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2015, filed August 13, 2015
4.3 Description of the Registrant’s Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020, filed March 12, 2021
10.1 Advisory Agreement, by and between the Company and KBS Capital Advisors LLC, dated as of September 27, 2021, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed September 28, 2021
10.2 Amended and Restated Loan Agreement by and among KBSIII 60 South Sixth Street, LLC, KBSIII Preston Commons, LLC, KBSIII Sterling Plaza, LLC, KBSIII Towers at Emeryville, LLC, KBSIII Ten Almaden, LLC, KBSIII Legacy Town Center, LLC and Bank of America, N.A., dated as of November 3, 2021
10.3 Assignment and Assumption by and among KBSIII 60 South Sixth Street, LLC, KBSIII Preston Commons, LLC, KBSIII Sterling Plaza, LLC, KBSIII Towers at Emeryville, LLC, KBSIII Ten Almaden, LLC, KBSIII Legacy Town Center, LLC, Bank of America, N.A. and Capital One, National Association, dated as of November 3, 2021
10.4 Assignment and Assumption by and among KBSIII 60 Sixth Street, LLC, KBSIII Preston Commons, LLC, KBSIII Sterling Plaza, LLC, KBSIII Towers at Emeryville, LLC, KBSIII Ten Almaden, LLC, KBSIII Legacy Town Center, LLC, Bank of America, N.A. and PNC Bank, National Association, dated as of November 3, 2021
10.5 Assignment and Assumption by and among KBSIII 60 South Sixth Street, LLC, KBSIII Preston Commons, LLC, KBSIII Sterling Plaza, LLC, KBSIII Towers at Emeryville, LLC, KBSIII Ten Almaden, LLC, KBSIII Legacy Town Center, LLC, Bank of America, N.A. and U.S. Bank, National Association, dated as of November 3, 2021
10.6 Assignment and Assumption by and among KBSIII 60 South Sixth Street, LLC, KBSIII Preston Commons, LLC, KBSIII Sterling Plaza, LLC, KBSIII Towers at Emeryville, LLC, KBSIII Ten Almaden, LLC, KBSIII Legacy Town Center, LLC, Regions Bank and Capital One, National Association, dated as of November 3, 2021
Ex. Description
10.7 Assignment and Assumption by and among KBSIII 60 South Sixth Street, LLC, KBSIII Preston Commons, LLC, KBSIII Sterling Plaza, LLC, KBSIII Towers at Emeryville, LLC, KBSIII Ten Almaden, LLC, KBSIII Legacy Town Center, LLC, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association and Capital One, National Association, dated as of November 3, 2021
10.8 Assignment and Assumption by and among KBSIII 60 South Sixth Street, LLC, KBSIII Preston Commons, LLC, KBSIII Sterling Plaza, LLC, KBSIII Towers at Emeryville, LLC, KBSIII Ten Almaden, LLC, KBSIII Legacy Town Center, LLC, Zions Bancorporation, N.A. (FKA ZB, N.A.) DBA California Bank & Trust and Capital One, National Association, dated as of November 3, 2021
10.9 Amendment to Mortgage, Assignment of Leases and Rents, Security Agreement and Fixture Filing by and between KBSIII Legacy Town Center, LLC and Bank of America, N.A., dated as of November 3, 2021
10.10 Amendment to Mortgage, Assignment of Leases and Rents, Security Agreement and Fixture Filing by and between KBSIII Preston Commons, LLC and Bank of America, N.A., dated as of November 3, 2021
10.11 Amendment to Mortgage, Assignment of Leases and Rents, Security Agreement and Fixture Filing by and between KBSIII Sterling Plaza, LLC and Bank of America, N.A., dated as of November 3, 2021
10.12 Amendment to Mortgage, Assignment of Leases and Rents, Security Agreement and Fixture Filing by and between KBSIII Ten Almaden, LLC and Bank of America, N.A., dated as of November 3, 2021
10.13 Amendment to Mortgage, Assignment of Leases and Rents, Security Agreement and Fixture Filing by and between KBSIII Towers at Emeryville, LLC and Bank of America, N.A., dated as of November 3, 2021
10.14 Amendment to Mortgage, Assignment of Leases and Rents, Security Agreement and Fixture Filing by and between KBSIII 60 South Sixth Street, LLC and Bank of America, N.A., dated as of November 3, 2021
10.15 Amended and Restated Guaranty Agreement by and between KBS REIT Properties III, LLC and Bank of America, N.A., dated as of November 3, 2021
10.16 Amended and Restated Promissory Note by and among KBSIII 60 South Sixth Street, LLC, KBSIII Preston Commons, LLC, KBSIII Sterling Plaza, LLC, KBSIII Towers at Emeryville, LLC, KBSIII Ten Almaden, LLC, KBSIII Legacy Town Center, LLC and Zions Bancorporation, N.A. (FKA ZB, N.A.) DBA California Bank & Trust, dated as of November 3, 2021
10.17 Amended and Restated Promissory Note by and among KBSIII 60 South Sixth Street, LLC, KBSIII Preston Commons, LLC, KBSIII Sterling Plaza, LLC, KBSIII Towers at Emeryville, LLC, KBSIII Ten Almaden, LLC, KBSIII Legacy Town Center, LLC and Capital One, National Association, dated as of November 3, 2021
10.18 Amended and Restated Promissory Note by and among KBSIII 60 South Sixth Street, LLC, KBSIII Preston Commons, LLC, KBSIII Sterling Plaza, LLC, KBSIII Towers at Emeryville, LLC, KBSIII Ten Almaden, LLC, KBSIII Legacy Town Center, LLC and Regions Bank, dated as of November 3, 2021
10.19 Amended and Restated Promissory Note by and among KBSIII 60 South Sixth Street, LLC, KBSIII Preston Commons, LLC, KBSIII Sterling Plaza, LLC, KBSIII Towers at Emeryville, LLC, KBSIII Ten Almaden, LLC, KBSIII Legacy Town Center, LLC and PNC Bank, National Association, dated as of November 3, 2021
10.20 Second Amended and Restated Promissory Note by and among KBSIII 60 South Sixth Street, LLC, KBSIII Preston Commons, LLC, KBSIII Sterling Plaza, LLC, KBSIII Towers at Emeryville, LLC, KBSIII Ten Almaden, LLC, KBSIII Legacy Town Center, LLC and Bank of America, N.A., dated as of November 3, 2021
10.21 Second Amended and Restated Promissory Note by and among KBSIII 60 South Sixth Street, LLC, KBSIII Preston Commons, LLC, KBSIII Sterling Plaza, LLC, KBSIII Towers at Emeryville, LLC, KBSIII Ten Almaden, LLC, KBSIII Legacy Town Center, LLC and U.S. Bank, National Association, dated as of November 3, 2021
10.22 Second Amended and Restated Promissory Note by and among KBSIII 60 South Sixth Street, LLC, KBSIII Preston Commons, LLC, KBSIII Sterling Plaza, LLC, KBSIII Towers at Emeryville, LLC, KBSIII Ten Almaden, LLC, KBSIII Legacy Town Center, LLC and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, dated as of November 3, 2021
Ex. Description
10.23 Term Loan Agreement, by and among KBSIII Domain Gateway, LLC, KBSIII 515 Congress, LLC, KBSIII 155 North 400 West, LLC, KBSIII 1550 West McEwen Drive, LLC and U.S. Bank National Association, dated October 17, 2018, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018, filed March 14, 2019
10.24 Deed of Trust, Assignment of Leases and Rents, Security Agreement, Fixture Filing and Financing Statement (515 Congress Project), by KBSIII 515 Congress, LLC for the benefit of U.S. Bank National Association, dated October 17, 2018, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.17 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018, filed March 14, 2019
10.25 Deed of Trust, Assignment of Leases and Rents, Security Agreement and Fixture Filing (Gateway Tech Project), by KBSIII 155 North 400 West, LLC for the benefit of U.S. Bank National Association, dated October 17, 2018, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018, filed March 14, 2019
10.26 Deed of Trust, Assignment of Leases and Rents, Security Agreement and Fixture Filing (McEwen Project), by KBSIII 1550 West McEwen Drive, LLC for the benefit of U.S. Bank National Association, dated October 17, 2018, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.19 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018, filed March 14, 2019
10.27 Recourse Carve-Out Guaranty Agreement, by KBS REIT Properties III, LLC for the benefit of U.S. Bank National Association, dated October 17, 2018, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.20 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018, filed March 14, 2019
10.28 Payment Guaranty Agreement, by KBS REIT Properties III, LLC for the benefit of U.S. Bank National Association, dated October 17, 2018, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.21 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018, filed March 14, 2019
10.29 First Modification and Additional Advance Agreement (Long Form), by and among KBSIII Domain Gateway, LLC, KBSIII 1550 West McEwen Drive, LLC, KBSIII 155 North 400 West, LLC, KBSIII 515 Congress, LLC, KBSIII 201 17th Street, LLC, U.S. Bank National Association and the Lenders party thereto, dated January 23, 2020, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.43 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019, filed March 6, 2020
10.30 Deed to Secure Debt, Assignment of Leases and Rents, Security Agreement and Fixture Filing (201 17th Street Project), by and between KBSIII 201 17th Street, LLC and U.S. Bank National Association, dated January 23, 2020, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.44 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019, filed March 6, 2020
10.31 Junior Deed of Trust, Assignment of Leases and Rents, Security Agreement, Fixture Filing and Financing Statement (515 Congress Project), by and among KBSIII 515 Congress, LLC, James A Johnson and U.S. Bank National Association, dated January 23, 2020, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.45 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019, filed March 6, 2020
10.32 Assumption and Joinder Agreement, by and among KBSIII 201 17th Street, LLC, the other Borrowers thereto and U.S. Bank National Association, dated January 23, 2020, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.48 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019, filed March 6, 2020
10.33 Amended and Restated Promissory Note, by and among KBSIII Domain Gateway, LLC, KBS 515 Congress, LLC, KBSIII 155 North 400 West, LLC, KBSIII 1550 West McEwen Drive, LLC, KBSIII 201 17th Street, LLC and Associated Bank, National Association, dated January 23, 2020, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.49 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019, filed March 6, 2020
10.34 Amended and Restated Promissory Note, by and among KBSIII Domain Gateway, LLC, KBS 515 Congress, LLC, KBSIII 155 North 400 West, LLC, KBSIII 1550 West McEwen Drive, LLC, KBSIII 201 17th Street, LLC and City National Bank, dated January 23, 2020, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.50 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019, filed March 6, 2020
10.35 Amended and Restated Promissory Note, by and among KBSIII Domain Gateway, LLC, KBS 515 Congress, LLC, KBSIII 155 North 400 West, LLC, KBSIII 1550 West McEwen Drive, LLC, KBSIII 201 17th Street, LLC and Regions Bank, dated January 23, 2020, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.51 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019, filed March 6, 2020
Ex. Description
10.36 Promissory Note, by and among KBSIII Domain Gateway, LLC, KBS 515 Congress, LLC, KBSIII 155 North 400 West, LLC, KBSIII 1550 West McEwen Drive, LLC, KBSIII 201 17th Street, LLC and Citizens Bank, dated January 23, 2020, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.52 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019, filed March 6, 2020
10.37 Second Amended and Restated Promissory Note, by and among KBSIII Domain Gateway, LLC, KBS 515 Congress, LLC, KBSIII 155 North 400 West, LLC, KBSIII 1550 West McEwen Drive, LLC, KBSIII 201 17th Street, LLC and U.S. Bank National Association, dated January 23, 2020, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.53 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019, filed March 6, 2020
10.38 Revolving and Term Loan Agreement, by and among KBSIII 500 West Madison, LLC, U.S. Bank National Association and Bank of America, N.A., dated November 2, 2020, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2020, filed November 16, 2020
10.39 Construction Mortgage, Assignment of Leases and Rents, Security Agreement and Fixture Filing, by and between KBSIII 500 West Madison, LLC and U.S. Bank National Association, dated November 2, 2020, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2020, filed November 16, 2020
10.40 Subordination, Nondisturbance, and Attornment Agreement, by and between U.S. Bank National Association and Accenture LLP, dated November 2, 2020, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2020, filed November 16, 2020
10.41 Promissory Note, by and between KBSIII 500 West Madison, LLC and U.S. Bank National Association, dated November 2, 2020, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2020, filed November 16, 2020
10.42 Promissory Note, by and between KBSIII 500 West Madison, LLC and Bank of America, N.A., dated November 2, 2020, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2020, filed November 16, 2020
10.43 Promissory Note, by and between KBSIII 500 West Madison, LLC and Deutsche Pfandbriefbank AG, dated November 2, 2020, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2020, filed November 16, 2020
10.44 Payment Guaranty Agreement, by and among KBS REIT Properties III, LLC and U.S. Bank National Association, dated November 2, 2020, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2020, filed November 16, 2020
10.45 Recourse Carve-Out Guaranty Agreement, by and among KBS REIT Properties III, LLC and U.S. Bank National Association, dated November 2, 2020, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2020, filed November 16, 2020
10.46 Environmental Indemnification Agreement, by and among KBSIII 500 West Madison, LLC and U.S. Bank National Association, dated November 2, 2020, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2020, filed November 16, 2020
10.47 Consent and Subordination of Management Agreements, by and among Transwestern Commercial Services Illinois, LLC, KBSIII 500 West Madison, LLC and U.S. Bank National Association, dated November 2, 2020, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2020, filed November 16, 2020
10.48 Amended and Restated Promissory Note by and between KBSIII 500 West Madison, LLC and U.S. Bank National Association, dated March 1, 2021, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.43 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020, filed March 12, 2021
10.49 Promissory Note by and between KBSIII 500 West Madison, LLC and National Bank of Kuwait S.A.K.P. dated March 1, 2021, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.44 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020, filed March 12, 2021
Ex. Description
10.50 Deed of Lease, by and between KBSIII 3003 Washington, LLC and KBS Realty Advisors, LLC, dated May 29, 2015, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2015, filed August 13, 2015
10.51 First Amendment to Deed of Lease, by and between KBSIII 3003 Washington, LLC and KBS Realty Advisors, LLC, dated March 14, 2019, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2019, filed May 15, 2019
21.1 Subsidiaries of the Company
23.1 Consent of Ernst & Young LLP
31.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
31.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as Adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as Adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
99.1 Fourth Amended and Restated Share Redemption Program, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.2 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2018, filed May 9, 2018
99.2 Amended and Restated Share Redemption Program, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K, filed July 16, 2021
99.3 Amended and Restated Share Redemption Program, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed March 18, 2022
99.4 Consent of Kroll, LLC
101.INS Inline XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema
101.CAL Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase
101.DEF Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase
101.LAB Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase
101.PRE Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase
104 Cover Page Interactive Data File (formatted as inline XBRL and contained in Exhibit 101)
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Consolidated Financial Statements
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (PCAOB ID: 42)
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2021 and 2020
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019
Consolidated Statements of Equity for the Years Ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Financial Statement Schedule
Schedule III - Real Estate Assets and Accumulated Depreciation and Amortization
All other schedules are omitted because they are not applicable or the required information is shown in the financial statements or notes thereto.
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Stockholders and the Board of Directors of
KBS Real Estate Investment Trust III, Inc.
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of KBS Real Estate Investment Trust III, Inc. (the Company) as of December 31, 2021 and 2020, the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2021, and the related notes and financial statement schedule listed in the Index at Item 15(a) (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company at December 31, 2021 and 2020, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2021, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.
Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Critical Audit Matter
The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current period audit of the financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective or complex judgments. The communication of the critical audit matter does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates.
Impairment of real estate investments
Description of the Matter
The Company’s real estate investments totaled $1.9 billion as of December 31, 2021. As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company monitors on an ongoing basis events and changes in circumstances that could indicate that the carrying amounts of its real estate and related intangible assets and liabilities may not be recoverable or realized. When indicators of potential impairment are present, the Company assesses the recoverability by estimating whether the Company will recover the carrying value of the real estate and related intangible assets and liabilities through its undiscounted future cash flows and eventual disposition of the property. If the carrying value of the real estate is determined to not be recoverable, the Company records an impairment loss to the extent that the carrying value exceeds the estimated fair value of the real estate and related intangible assets and liabilities.
Auditing the Company’s process to evaluate real estate investments for impairment was especially challenging as a result of the high degree of judgment and subjectivity in determining whether indicators of impairment were present for certain properties, and in determining the future undiscounted cash flows and estimated fair values, where necessary, of properties where indicators of impairment were determined to be present. In particular, the undiscounted cash flows and fair value estimates were sensitive to significant assumptions including market rental rates and related leasing assumptions, anticipated asset hold periods, capitalization rates and discount rates, which are affected by expectations about future market or economic conditions.
How We Addressed the Matter in Our Audit
To test the Company’s real estate impairment assessment, our audit procedures included, among others, evaluating the significant judgments applied in determining whether indicators of impairment were present, obtaining evidence to corroborate such judgments and searching for evidence contrary to such judgments, evaluating the methodologies and testing the significant assumptions listed above used to estimate undiscounted cash flows and, where applicable, fair values for certain properties with identified higher impairment risk characteristics. We also held discussions with management about business plans for the assets and other judgments used in determining hold periods and cash flow estimates for the assets, and compared information used in the impairment assessment to information included in materials presented to the Company’s Board of Directors. Further, we compared significant assumptions used by management as listed above to current industry and economic trends, observable market-specific data, and historical results of the properties. In certain instances, we involved our internal real estate valuation specialists to assist in performing these procedures.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2010.
Irvine, California
March 31, 2022
KBS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST III, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
December 31,
2021 2020
Assets
Real estate:
Land $ 290,121 $ 290,121
Buildings and improvements 2,090,983 2,021,380
Tenant origination and absorption costs 60,162 75,664
Total real estate held for investment, cost 2,441,266 2,387,165
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization (572,968) (490,365)
Total real estate held for investment, net 1,868,298 1,896,800
Real estate held for sale, net - 132,143
Total real estate, net 1,868,298 2,028,943
Real estate equity securities 180,228 -
Total real estate and real estate-related investments, net 2,048,526 2,028,943
Cash and cash equivalents 44,404 72,523
Restricted cash 2,032 5,288
Investment in an unconsolidated entity - 233,592
Rents and other receivables, net 88,534 85,539
Above-market leases, net 348 449
Due from affiliates 343 -
Assets related to real estate held for sale, net - 13,091
Prepaid expenses and other assets 70,014 64,900
Total assets $ 2,254,201 $ 2,504,325
Liabilities and equity
Notes payable, net
Notes payable, net $ 1,465,398 $ 1,358,468
Notes payable related to real estate held for sale, net - 29,897
Total notes payable, net 1,465,398 1,388,365
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities 58,323 55,814
Due to affiliate 8,126 8,626
Distributions payable 7,735 9,187
Below-market leases, net 3,277 6,116
Liabilities related to real estate held for sale, net - 21,001
Other liabilities 48,780 70,457
Total liabilities 1,591,639 1,559,566
Commitments and contingencies (Note 11)
Redeemable common stock 42,369 46,723
Stockholders’ equity:
Preferred stock, $.01 par value per share; 10,000,000 shares authorized, no shares issued and outstanding
- -
Common stock, $.01 par value per share; 1,000,000,000 shares authorized, 153,150,766 and 184,249,076 shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively
1,532 1,842
Additional paid-in capital 1,322,613 1,641,184
Cumulative distributions in excess of net income (703,952) (744,990)
Total stockholders’ equity 620,193 898,036
Total liabilities and equity $ 2,254,201 $ 2,504,325
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
KBS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST III, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
Years Ended December 31,
2021 2020 2019
Revenues:
Rental income $ 280,144 $ 282,527 $ 355,438
Interest income from real estate loan receivable - 5,666 -
Other operating income 16,617 18,725 29,834
Total revenues 296,761 306,918 385,272
Expenses:
Operating, maintenance and management 68,806 71,470 92,271
Real estate taxes and insurance 57,687 57,234 62,989
Asset management fees to affiliate 19,832 20,990 24,614
General and administrative expenses 6,116 6,600 8,418
Depreciation and amortization 110,984 110,806 141,102
Interest expense 29,301 81,139 114,272
Impairment charges on real estate - 19,896 8,706
Total expenses 292,726 368,135 452,372
Other income (loss):
Other income - - 4,089
Other interest income 52 72 655
Equity in income (loss) of an unconsolidated entity 8,698 (465) (1,443)
Loss from extinguishment of debt (214) (199) (2,229)
Unrealized gain on real estate equity securities 16,765 - -
Gain on sale of real estate, net 114,321 49,457 327,211
Total other income, net 139,622 48,865 328,283
Net income (loss) 143,657 (12,352) 261,183
Net (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interest - (6,145) 28
Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders $ 143,657 $ (18,497) $ 261,211
Net income (loss) per common share attributable to common stockholders, basic and diluted $ 0.83 $ (0.10) $ 1.49
Weighted-average number of common shares outstanding, basic and diluted 172,330,821 182,806,753 174,874,422
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
KBS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST III, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY
(dollars in thousands)
Common Stock
Additional Paid-in Capital Cumulative Distributions in Excess of Net Income Total Stockholders’ Equity Noncontrolling Interest Total Equity
Shares Amounts
Balance, December 31, 2018 177,523,853 $ 1,775 $ 1,555,380 $ (626,543) $ 930,612 $ 283 $ 930,895
Net income (loss) - - - 261,211 261,211 (28) 261,183
Issuance of common stock 4,527,465 45 51,659 - 51,704 - 51,704
Transfers from redeemable common stock - - 4,427 - 4,427 - 4,427
Redemptions of common stock (8,801,788) (88) (100,908) - (100,996) - (100,996)
Stock distribution issued 7,721,213 78 89,874 (89,952) - - -
Distributions declared - - - (161,887) (161,887) - (161,887)
Other offering costs - - (16) - (16) - (16)
Balance, December 31, 2019 180,970,743 $ 1,810 $ 1,600,416 $ (617,171) $ 985,055 $ 255 $ 985,310
Net (loss) income - - - (18,497) (18,497) 6,145 (12,352)
Issuance of common stock 4,220,684 42 46,680 - 46,722 - 46,722
Transfers from redeemable common stock - - 4,981 - 4,981 - 4,981
Redemptions of common stock (942,351) (10) (10,867) - (10,877) - (10,877)
Distributions declared - - - (109,322) (109,322) - (109,322)
Other offering costs - - (26) - (26) - (26)
Distribution to noncontrolling interest - - - - - (6,400) (6,400)
Balance, December 31, 2020 184,249,076 $ 1,842 $ 1,641,184 $ (744,990) $ 898,036 $ - $ 898,036
Net income - - - 143,657 143,657 - 143,657
Issuance of common stock 4,145,065 41 42,328 - 42,369 - 42,369
Transfers from redeemable common stock - - 4,354 - 4,354 - 4,354
Redemptions of common stock (35,243,375) (351) (365,236) - (365,587) - (365,587)
Distributions declared - - - (102,619) (102,619) - (102,619)
Other offering costs - - (17) - (17) - (17)
Balance, December 31, 2021 153,150,766 $ 1,532 $ 1,322,613 $ (703,952) $ 620,193 $ - $ 620,193
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
KBS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST III, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands)
Years Ended December 31,
2021 2020 2019
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
Net income (loss) $ 143,657 $ (12,352) $ 261,183
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization 110,984 110,806 141,102
Impairment charges on real estate - 19,896 8,706
Noncash interest income on real estate loan receivable - (2,415) -
Unrealized gain on real estate equity securities (16,765) - -
Equity in (income) loss of unconsolidated entities (8,698) 465 1,443
Distribution of operating cash flow from an unconsolidated entity
19,861 19,314 -
Deferred rents (2,550) (4,564) (6,224)
Amortization of above- and below-market leases, net (2,754) (2,807) (3,515)
Amortization of deferred financing costs 3,978 4,293 5,385
Unrealized (gains) losses on derivative instruments (23,283) 25,165 35,664
Loss from extinguishment of debt 214 199 2,229
Gain on sale of real estate (114,321) (49,457) (327,211)
Interest rate swap settlements for off-market swap instruments 3,031 476 -
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Rents and other receivables (5,005) (2,698) (10,600)
Prepaid expenses and other assets (14,361) (9,015) (32,947)
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities 4,141 (6,696) (933)
Other liabilities 3,513 9,247 (7,114)
Due from affiliates (343) - -
Due to affiliates (500) 1,873 3,460
Net cash provided by operating activities 100,799 101,730 70,628
Cash Flows from Investing Activities:
Improvements to real estate (70,131) (87,630) (79,931)
Proceeds from sale of real estate, net 237,683 25,091 931,489
Proceeds from payoff of real estate loan receivable - 150,213 -
Proceeds from the sale of real estate equity securities 58,936 - 16,186
Payments for construction in progress - (3,277) (21,706)
Origination costs on real estate loan receivable - (120) -
Payments of post-closing acquisition costs - - (1,014)
Escrow deposits for tenant improvements - - 972
Insurance proceeds received for property damage - - 867
Net cash provided by investing activities 226,488 84,277 846,863
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:
Proceeds from notes payable 806,090 421,760 377,589
Principal payments on notes payable (730,545) (491,391) (1,107,369)
Payments of deferred financing costs (2,704) (6,339) (2,609)
Interest rate swap settlements for off-market swap instruments (3,017) (231) -
Payments to redeem common stock (365,587) (10,877) (100,996)
Payments of prepaid other offering costs (1,180) (1,159) (264)
Payments of other offering costs (17) (26) (16)
Distribution to noncontrolling interest - (6,400) -
Distributions paid to common stockholders (61,702) (62,805) (110,592)
Net cash used in financing activities (358,662) (157,468) (944,257)
Net (decrease) increase in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash (31,375) 28,539 (26,766)
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash, beginning of period 77,811 49,272 76,038
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash, end of period $ 46,436 $ 77,811 $ 49,272
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information:
Interest paid, net of capitalized interest $0, $0 and $1,711 for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019, respectively
$ 45,586 $ 51,576 $ 75,471
Supplemental Disclosure of Noncash Investing and Financing Activities:
Equity securities received in connection with the portfolio sale $ - $ - $ 271,000
Distributions payable $ 7,735 $ 9,187 $ 9,392
Distributions paid to common stockholders through common stock issuances pursuant to the dividend reinvestment plan $ 42,369 $ 46,722 $ 51,704
Accrued improvements to real estate $ 17,985 $ 18,589 $ 26,310
Capital improvements paid by tenant
$ - $ 16,283 $ -
Construction in progress payable $ - $ - $ 2,144
Acquisition fee related to construction in progress due to affiliate $ - $ - $ 1,133
Accrued prepaid other offering costs $ 19 $ 782 $ 33
Financing of interest rate swap liability through off-market swap instruments $ - $ 8,156 $ -
Accrued interest rate swap settlements related to off-market swap instruments $ 259 $ 245 $ -
Real estate equity securities reclassed from investment in unconsolidated entity $ 163,463 $ - $ -
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
KBS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST III, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2021
1. ORGANIZATION
KBS Real Estate Investment Trust III, Inc. (the “Company”) was formed on December 22, 2009 as a Maryland corporation that elected to be taxed as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) beginning with the taxable year ended December 31, 2011 and it intends to continue to operate in such manner. Substantially all of the Company’s business is conducted through KBS Limited Partnership III (the “Operating Partnership”), a Delaware limited partnership. The Company is the sole general partner of and owns a 0.1% partnership interest in the Operating Partnership. KBS REIT Holdings III LLC (“REIT Holdings III”), the limited partner of the Operating Partnership, owns the remaining 99.9% interest in the Operating Partnership and is its sole limited partner. The Company is the sole member and manager of REIT Holdings III.
Subject to certain restrictions and limitations, the business of the Company is externally managed by KBS Capital Advisors LLC (the “Advisor”), an affiliate of the Company, pursuant to an advisory agreement the Company entered into with the Advisor (the “Advisory Agreement”). On January 26, 2010, the Company issued 20,000 shares of its common stock to the Advisor at a purchase price of $10.00 per share. As of December 31, 2021, the Advisor owned 20,857 shares of the Company’s common stock.
The Company owns a diverse portfolio of real estate investments. As of December 31, 2021, the Company owned 16 office properties, one mixed-use office/retail property and an investment in the equity securities of Prime US REIT, a Singapore real estate investment trust (the “SREIT”).
The Company commenced its initial public offering (the “Offering”) on October 26, 2010. Upon commencing the Offering, the Company retained KBS Capital Markets Group LLC (the “Dealer Manager”), an affiliate of the Company, to serve as the dealer manager of the Offering pursuant to a dealer manager agreement, as amended and restated (the “Dealer Manager Agreement”). The Company ceased offering shares of common stock in the primary Offering on May 29, 2015 and terminated the primary Offering on July 28, 2015.
The Company sold 169,006,162 shares of common stock in the primary Offering for gross proceeds of $1.7 billion. As of December 31, 2021, the Company had also sold 40,819,751 shares of common stock under its dividend reinvestment plan for gross offering proceeds of $421.7 million. Also as of December 31, 2021, the Company had redeemed or repurchased 64,674,823 shares sold in the Offering for $687.9 million.
Additionally, on October 3, 2014, the Company issued 258,462 shares of common stock for $2.4 million in private transactions exempt from the registration requirements pursuant to Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933.
The Company continues to offer shares of common stock under its dividend reinvestment plan. In some states, the Company will need to renew the registration statement annually or file a new registration statement to continue its dividend reinvestment plan offering. The Company may terminate its dividend reinvestment plan offering at any time.
KBS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST III, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
December 31, 2021
1. ORGANIZATION (CONTINUED)
COVID-19 Pandemic
One of the most significant risks and uncertainties facing the Company and the real estate industry generally continues to be the effect of the ongoing public health crisis of the novel coronavirus disease (“COVID-19”) pandemic. The Company continues to closely monitor the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on all aspects of its business, including how the pandemic is affecting its tenants and its investment in the SREIT. From March 2020 through December 31, 2021, the Company did not experience significant disruptions in its operations from the COVID-19 pandemic. During the year ended December 31, 2020, the Company did, however, recognize an impairment charge on an office/retail property due to the continued deterioration of retail demand at the property, which was further impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. Many of the Company’s tenants have experienced disruptions in their business, some more severely than others. In general, the Company’s retail and restaurant tenants, which comprise approximately 4% of its annualized base rent, have been more severely impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic than its office tenants. In addition, since April 2020, the Company granted rent relief to a number of tenants as a result of the pandemic, but as the impact of the pandemic continues to be felt, these tenants or additional tenants may request rent relief in future periods or become unable to pay rent and therefore, the Company is unable to predict the ultimate impact the pandemic will have on its financial condition, results of operations and cash flows due to numerous uncertainties. The Company is evaluating each tenant rent relief request on an individual basis, considering a number of factors. Not all tenant requests will ultimately result in modified agreements, nor is the Company forgoing its contractual rights under its lease agreements. Further, significant reductions in rental revenue in the future related to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic may limit the Company’s ability to draw on its revolving credit facilities or exercise extension options due to covenants described in the Company’s loan agreements.
The extent to which the COVID-19 pandemic impacts the Company’s operations and those of its tenants and the Company’s investment in the SREIT depends on future developments, which are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted with confidence, including the scope, severity and duration of the pandemic, the actions taken to contain the pandemic or mitigate its impact, and the direct and indirect economic effects of the pandemic and containment measures, among others.
2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Principles of Consolidation and Basis of Presentation
The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) as contained within the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) and the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”).
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company, REIT Holdings III, the Operating Partnership, their direct and indirect wholly owned subsidiaries, and through May 7, 2020, a joint venture in which the Company held a controlling interest. All significant intercompany balances and transactions are eliminated in consolidation.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes thereto in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could materially differ from those estimates.
Reclassifications
Certain amounts in the Company’s prior period consolidated financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation. These reclassifications have not changed the results of operations of prior periods.
During the year ended December 31, 2020, the Company sold a multifamily apartment complex held through a consolidated joint venture. During the year ended December 31, 2021, the Company sold two office properties. As a result, certain assets and liabilities related to these properties were reclassified to held for sale on the consolidated balance sheets for all periods presented.
KBS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST III, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
December 31, 2021
2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)
Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Comprehensive income (loss) for each of the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019 was equal to net income (loss) for these respective periods.
Revenue Recognition - Operating Leases
Real Estate
On January 1, 2019, the Company adopted ASU 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842) including the package of practical expedients (“Topic 842”) for all leases that commenced before the effective date of January 1, 2019. Accordingly, the Company (i) did not reassess whether any expired or existing contracts are or contain leases, (ii) did not reassess the lease classification for any expired or existing lease, and (iii) did not reassess initial direct costs for any existing leases. The Company did not elect the practical expedient related to using hindsight to reevaluate the lease term. In addition, the Company adopted the practical expedient for land easements and did not assess whether existing or expired land easements that were not previously accounted for as leases under the lease accounting standards of Topic 840 are or contain a lease under Topic 842.
In addition, Topic 842 provides an optional transition method to allow entities to apply the new lease accounting standards at the adoption date and recognize a cumulative-effect adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings. The Company adopted this transition method upon its adoption of the lease accounting standards of Topic 842, which did not result in a cumulative effect adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings on January 1, 2019.
In accordance with Topic 842, tenant reimbursements for property taxes and insurance are included in the single lease component of the lease contract (the right of the lessee to use the leased space) and therefore are accounted for as variable lease payments and are recorded as rental income on the Company’s statement of operations. In addition, the Company adopted the practical expedient available under Topic 842 to not separate nonlease components from the associated lease component and instead to account for those components as a single component if the nonlease components otherwise would be accounted for under the new revenue recognition standard (Topic 606) and if certain conditions are met, specifically related to tenant reimbursements for common area maintenance which would otherwise be accounted for under the revenue recognition standard. The Company believes the two conditions have been met for tenant reimbursements for common area maintenance as (i) the timing and pattern of transfer of the nonlease components and associated lease components are the same and (ii) the lease component would be classified as an operating lease. Accordingly, tenant reimbursements for common area maintenance are also accounted for as variable lease payments and recorded as rental income on the Company’s statement of operations.
The Company recognizes minimum rent, including rental abatements, lease incentives and contractual fixed increases attributable to operating leases, on a straight-line basis over the term of the related leases when collectibility is probable and records amounts expected to be received in later years as deferred rent receivable. If the lease provides for tenant improvements, the Company determines whether the tenant improvements, for accounting purposes, are owned by the tenant or the Company. When the Company is the owner of the tenant improvements, the tenant is not considered to have taken physical possession or have control of the physical use of the leased asset until the tenant improvements are substantially completed. When the tenant is the owner of the tenant improvements, any tenant improvement allowance (including amounts that can be taken in the form of cash or a credit against the tenant’s rent) that is funded is treated as a lease incentive and amortized as a reduction of rental revenue over the lease term. Tenant improvement ownership is determined based on various factors including, but not limited to:
•whether the lease stipulates how a tenant improvement allowance may be spent;
•whether the lessee or lessor supervises the construction and bears the risk of cost overruns;
•whether the amount of a tenant improvement allowance is in excess of market rates;
•whether the tenant or landlord retains legal title to the improvements at the end of the lease term;
•whether the tenant improvements are unique to the tenant or general purpose in nature; and
•whether the tenant improvements are expected to have any residual value at the end of the lease.
KBS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST III, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
December 31, 2021
2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)
The Company leased apartment units under operating leases with terms generally of one year or less. Generally, credit investigations were performed for prospective residents and security deposits were obtained. The Company recognized rental revenue, net of concessions, on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease, when collectibility was determined to be probable.
In accordance with Topic 842, the Company makes a determination of whether the collectibility of the lease payments in an operating lease is probable. If the Company determines the lease payments are not probable of collection, the Company would fully reserve for any contractual lease payments, deferred rent receivable, and variable lease payments and would recognize rental income only if cash is received. These changes to the Company’s collectibility assessment are reflected as an adjustment to rental income.
The Company, as a lessor, records costs to negotiate or arrange a lease that would have been incurred regardless of whether the lease was obtained, such as legal costs incurred to negotiate an operating lease, as an expense and classifies such costs as operating, maintenance, and management expense on the Company’s consolidated statement of operations, as these costs are no longer capitalizable under the definition of initial direct costs under Topic 842.
Sales of Real Estate
The Company follows the guidance of ASC 610-20, Other Income - Gains and Losses from the Derecognition of Nonfinancial Assets (“ASC 610-20”), which applies to sales or transfers to noncustomers of nonfinancial assets or in substance nonfinancial assets that do not meet the definition of a business. Generally, the Company’s sales of real estate would be considered a sale of a nonfinancial asset as defined by ASC 610-20.
ASC 610-20 refers to the revenue recognition principles under ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606). Under ASC 610-20, if the Company determines it does not have a controlling financial interest in the entity that holds the asset and the arrangement meets the criteria to be accounted for as a contract, the Company would derecognize the asset and recognize a gain or loss on the sale of the real estate when control of the underlying asset transfers to the buyer.
Real Estate Loan Receivable
Interest income on the Company’s real estate loan receivable was recognized on an accrual basis over the life of the investment using the interest method. Direct loan origination fees and origination or acquisition costs, as well as premiums or discounts, were amortized over the term of the loan as an adjustment to interest income.
Real Estate Equity Securities
Dividend income from real estate equity securities is recognized on an accrual basis based on eligible units as of the ex-dividend date.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
The Company recognizes interest income on its cash and cash equivalents as it is earned and classifies such amounts as other interest income.
KBS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST III, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
December 31, 2021
2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)
Real Estate
Depreciation and Amortization
Real estate costs related to the acquisition and improvement of properties are capitalized and depreciated over the expected useful life of the asset on a straight-line basis. Repair and maintenance costs are charged to expense as incurred and significant replacements and betterments are capitalized. Repair and maintenance costs include all costs that do not extend the useful life of the real estate asset. The Company considers the period of future benefit of an asset to determine its appropriate useful life. Expenditures for tenant improvements are capitalized and amortized over the shorter of the tenant’s lease term or expected useful life. The Company anticipates the estimated useful lives of its assets by class to be generally as follows:
Land N/A
Buildings 25-40 years
Building improvements 10-25 years
Tenant improvements Shorter of lease term or expected useful life
Tenant origination and absorption costs Remaining term of related leases, including below-market renewal periods
Real Estate Acquisition Valuation
The Company records the acquisition of income-producing real estate or real estate that will be used for the production of income as a business combination or an asset acquisition. If substantially all of the fair value of the gross assets acquired are concentrated in a single identifiable asset or group of similar identifiable assets, then the set is not a business. For purposes of this test, land and buildings can be combined along with the intangible assets for any in-place leases and accordingly, most acquisitions of investment properties would not meet the definition of a business and would be accounted for as an asset acquisition. To be considered a business, a set must include an input and a substantive process that together significantly contributes to the ability to create an output. All assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination are measured at their acquisition-date fair values. For asset acquisitions, the cost of the acquisition is allocated to individual assets and liabilities on a relative fair value basis. Acquisition costs associated with business combinations are expensed as incurred. Acquisition costs associated with asset acquisitions are capitalized.
The Company assesses the acquisition date fair values of all tangible assets, identifiable intangibles and assumed liabilities using methods similar to those used by independent appraisers, generally utilizing a discounted cash flow analysis that applies appropriate discount and/or capitalization rates and available market information. Estimates of future cash flows are based on a number of factors, including historical operating results, known and anticipated trends, and market and economic conditions. The fair value of tangible assets of an acquired property considers the value of the property as if it were vacant.
The Company records above-market and below-market in-place lease values for acquired properties based on the present value (using a discount rate that reflects the risks associated with the leases acquired) of the difference between (i) the contractual amounts to be paid pursuant to the in-place leases and (ii) management’s estimate of fair market lease rates for the corresponding in-place leases, measured over a period equal to the remaining non-cancelable term of above-market in-place leases and for the initial term plus any extended term for any leases with below-market renewal options. The Company amortizes any recorded above-market or below-market lease values as a reduction or increase, respectively, to rental income over the remaining non-cancelable terms of the respective lease, including any below-market renewal periods.
The Company estimates the value of tenant origination and absorption costs by considering the estimated carrying costs during hypothetical expected lease-up periods, considering current market conditions. In estimating carrying costs, the Company includes real estate taxes, insurance and other operating expenses and estimates of lost rentals at market rates during the expected lease-up periods.
The Company amortizes the value of tenant origination and absorption costs to depreciation and amortization expense over the remaining non-cancelable term of the leases.
KBS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST III, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
December 31, 2021
2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)
Subsequent to the acquisition of a property, the Company may incur and capitalize costs necessary to get the property ready for its intended use. During that time, certain costs such as legal fees, real estate taxes and insurance and financing costs are also capitalized.
Impairment of Real Estate and Related Intangible Assets and Liabilities
The Company continually monitors events and changes in circumstances that could indicate that the carrying amounts of its real estate and related intangible assets and liabilities may not be recoverable or realized. When indicators of potential impairment suggest that the carrying value of real estate and related intangible assets and liabilities may not be recoverable, the Company assesses the recoverability by estimating whether the Company will recover the carrying value of the real estate and related intangible assets and liabilities through its undiscounted future cash flows and its eventual disposition. If, based on this analysis, the Company does not believe that it will be able to recover the carrying value of the real estate and related intangible assets and liabilities, the Company would record an impairment loss to the extent that the carrying value exceeds the estimated fair value of the real estate and related intangible assets and liabilities. The Company did not record any impairment loss on its real estate and related intangible assets during the year ended December 31, 2021. During the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, the Company recorded impairment losses of $19.9 million and $8.7 million, respectively, on its real estate and related intangible assets. See Note 3, “Real Estate - Impairment of Real Estate.”
Real Estate Held for Sale
The Company generally considers real estate to be “held for sale” when the following criteria are met: (i) management commits to a plan to sell the property, (ii) the property is available for sale immediately, (iii) the property is actively being marketed for sale at a price that is reasonable in relation to its current fair value, (iv) the sale of the property within one year is considered probable and (v) significant changes to the plan to sell are not expected. Real estate that is held for sale and its related assets are classified as “real estate held for sale” and “assets related to real estate held for sale,” respectively, for all periods presented in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. Notes payable and other liabilities related to real estate held for sale are classified as “notes payable related to real estate held for sale” and “liabilities related to real estate held for sale,” respectively, for all periods presented in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. Real estate classified as held for sale is no longer depreciated and is reported at the lower of its carrying value or its estimated fair value less estimated costs to sell. Operating results of properties and related gains on sale of properties that were disposed of or classified as held for sale in the ordinary course of business are included in continuing operations on the Company’s consolidated statements of operations.
Investments in Unconsolidated Joint Ventures
The Company accounts for investments in joint ventures or entities over which the Company may exercise significant influence, but does not control, and for investments in joint ventures that qualify as variable interest entities of which the Company is not the primary beneficiary using the equity method of accounting. Under the equity method, the investment is initially recorded at cost and subsequently adjusted to reflect additional contributions or distributions and the Company’s proportionate share of equity in the entity’s income (loss). The Company recognizes its proportionate share of the ongoing income or loss of the unconsolidated entity as equity in income (loss) of unconsolidated entities on the consolidated statements of operations. In addition, the Company accounts for any share issuances by the unconsolidated entity as if the Company sold a proportionate share of its investment. Any gain or loss as a result of the unconsolidated entity’s share issuance is recognized in equity in income (loss) of unconsolidated entities on the consolidated statement of operations. On a quarterly basis, the Company evaluated its investment in an unconsolidated entity for other-than-temporary impairments. As of December 31, 2021, there were no unconsolidated joint ventures accounted for under the equity method.
Real Estate Equity Securities
Real estate equity securities are carried at fair value based on quoted market prices for the security. Unrealized gains and losses on real estate equity securities are recognized in earnings.
KBS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST III, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
December 31, 2021
2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)
Cash and Cash Equivalents
The Company considers all highly liquid investments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. Cash equivalents may include cash and short term investments. Cash and cash equivalents are stated at cost, which approximates fair value. There are no restrictions on the use of the Company’s cash and cash equivalents as of December 31, 2021.
The Company’s cash and cash equivalents balance exceeds federally insurable limits as of December 31, 2021. The Company monitors the cash balances in its operating accounts and adjusts the cash balances as appropriate; however, these cash balances could be impacted if the underlying financial institutions fail or are subject to other adverse conditions in the financial markets. To date, the Company has experienced no loss or lack of access to cash in its operating accounts.
Restricted Cash
Restricted cash is composed of lender impound reserve accounts on the Company’s borrowings for capital improvements.
Rents and Other Receivables
The Company makes a determination of whether the collectibility of the lease payments in its operating leases is probable. If the Company determines the lease payments are not probable of collection, the Company would fully reserve for any outstanding rent receivables related to contractual lease payments and variable leases payments, would write-off any deferred rent receivable and would recognize rental income only if cash is received. The Company exercises judgment in assessing collectibility and considers payment history, current credit status, the tenant’s financial condition, security deposits, letters of credit, lease guarantees and current market conditions that may impact the tenant’s ability to make payments in accordance with its lease agreements, including the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the tenant’s business, in making the determination.
Derivative Instruments
The Company enters into derivative instruments for risk management purposes to hedge its exposure to cash flow variability caused by changing interest rates on its variable rate notes payable. The Company records these derivative instruments at fair value on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. The changes in fair value for derivative instruments that are not designated as a hedge or that do not meet the hedge accounting criteria are recorded as gain or loss on derivative instruments and included in interest expense as presented in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
Fair Value Election of Hybrid Financial Instruments with Embedded Derivatives
When the Company enters into interest rate swaps which include off-market terms, the Company determines if these contracts are hybrid financial instruments with embedded derivatives requiring bifurcation between the host contract and the derivative instrument. The Company elected to initially and subsequently measure these hybrid financial instruments in their entirety at fair value with concurrent documentation of this election. Changes in the fair value of the hybrid financial instrument under this fair value election are recorded in earnings and are included in interest expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. The cash flows for these off-market swap instruments which contain an other-than-insignificant financing element at inception are included in cash flows provided by or used in financing activities on the accompanying consolidated statements of cash flows.
Deferred Financing Costs
Deferred financing costs represent commitment fees, loan fees, legal fees and other third-party costs associated with obtaining financing and are presented on the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying value of the associated debt liability. These costs are amortized over the terms of the respective financing agreements using the effective interest method. Unamortized deferred financing costs are generally expensed when the associated debt is refinanced or repaid before maturity unless specific rules are met that would allow for the carryover of such costs to the refinanced debt. Deferred financing costs incurred before an associated debt liability is recognized are included in prepaid and other assets on the balance sheet. Costs incurred in seeking financing transactions that do not close are expensed in the period in which it is determined that the financing will not close.
KBS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST III, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
December 31, 2021
2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)
Fair Value Measurements
The Company is required to measure certain financial instruments at fair value on a recurring basis. In addition, the Company is required to measure other non-financial and financial assets at fair value on a non-recurring basis (e.g., carrying value of impaired real estate loans receivable and long-lived assets). Fair value is defined as the price that would be received upon the sale of an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The fair value framework uses a three-tiered approach. Fair value measurements are classified and disclosed in one of the following three categories:
•Level 1: unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical assets or liabilities;
•Level 2: quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active, and model-derived valuations in which significant inputs and significant value drivers are observable in active markets; and
•Level 3: prices or valuation techniques where little or no market data is available that requires inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable.
When available, the Company utilizes quoted market prices from independent third-party sources to determine fair value and classifies such items in Level 1 or Level 2. In instances where the market for a financial instrument is not active, regardless of the availability of a nonbinding quoted market price, observable inputs might not be relevant and could require the Company to make a significant adjustment to derive a fair value measurement. Additionally, in an inactive market, a market price quoted from an independent third party may rely more on models with inputs based on information available only to that independent third party. When the Company determines the market for a financial instrument owned by the Company to be illiquid or when market transactions for similar instruments do not appear orderly, the Company uses several valuation sources (including internal valuations, discounted cash flow analysis and quoted market prices) and establishes a fair value by assigning weights to the various valuation sources. Additionally, when determining the fair value of liabilities in circumstances in which a quoted price in an active market for an identical liability is not available, the Company measures fair value using (i) a valuation technique that uses the quoted price of the identical liability when traded as an asset or quoted prices for similar liabilities when traded as assets or (ii) another valuation technique that is consistent with the principles of fair value measurement, such as the income approach or the market approach.
Changes in assumptions or estimation methodologies can have a material effect on these estimated fair values. In this regard, the derived fair value estimates cannot be substantiated by comparison to independent markets and, in many cases, may not be realized in an immediate settlement of the instrument.
The Company considers the following factors to be indicators of an inactive market: (i) there are few recent transactions, (ii) price quotations are not based on current information, (iii) price quotations vary substantially either over time or among market makers (for example, some brokered markets), (iv) indexes that previously were highly correlated with the fair values of the asset or liability are demonstrably uncorrelated with recent indications of fair value for that asset or liability, (v) there is a significant increase in implied liquidity risk premiums, yields, or performance indicators (such as delinquency rates or loss severities) for observed transactions or quoted prices when compared with the Company’s estimate of expected cash flows, considering all available market data about credit and other nonperformance risk for the asset or liability, (vi) there is a wide bid-ask spread or significant increase in the bid-ask spread, (vii) there is a significant decline or absence of a market for new issuances (that is, a primary market) for the asset or liability or similar assets or liabilities, and (viii) little information is released publicly (for example, a principal-to-principal market).
The Company considers the following factors to be indicators of non-orderly transactions: (i) there was not adequate exposure to the market for a period before the measurement date to allow for marketing activities that are usual and customary for transactions involving such assets or liabilities under current market conditions, (ii) there was a usual and customary marketing period, but the seller marketed the asset or liability to a single market participant, (iii) the seller is in or near bankruptcy or receivership (that is, distressed), or the seller was required to sell to meet regulatory or legal requirements (that is, forced), and (iv) the transaction price is an outlier when compared with other recent transactions for the same or similar assets or liabilities.
KBS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST III, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
December 31, 2021
2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)
Dividend Reinvestment Plan
The Company has adopted a dividend reinvestment plan pursuant to which common stockholders may elect to have all or a portion of their dividends and other distributions, exclusive of dividends and other distributions that the Company’s board of directors designates as ineligible for reinvestment through the dividend reinvestment plan, reinvested in additional shares of the Company’s common stock in lieu of receiving cash distributions. Participants in the dividend reinvestment plan acquire shares of the Company’s common stock at a price equal to 95% of the estimated value per share of the Company’s common stock, as determined by the Advisor or another firm chosen by the Company’s board of directors for that purpose.
On December 3, 2018, the Company’s board of directors approved an estimated value per share of the Company’s common stock of $12.02 (unaudited) based on the estimated value of the Company’s assets less the estimated value of the Company’s liabilities, or net asset value, divided by the number of shares outstanding, all as of September 30, 2018, with the exception of an adjustment to the Company’s net asset value for the acquisition and assumed loan costs related to the Company’s buyout of a joint venture partner’s equity interest in a joint venture that closed subsequent to September 30, 2018 and a reduction to the Company’s net asset value for deferred financing costs related to a portfolio revolving loan facility that closed subsequent to September 30, 2018. The change in the dividend reinvestment plan purchase price was effective for the January 2, 2019 dividend reinvestment plan purchase date and was effective until the estimated value per share was updated. Commencing with the January 2, 2019 purchase date and until the estimated value per share was updated, the purchase price per share under the dividend reinvestment plan was $11.42.
On December 4, 2019, the Company’s board of directors approved an estimated value per share of the Company’s common stock of $11.65 (unaudited) based on the estimated value of the Company’s assets less the estimated value of the Company’s liabilities, or net asset value, divided by the number of shares outstanding, all as of September 30, 2019, with the exception of adjustments to the Company’s net asset value to give effect to (i) the October 23, 2019 authorization of a special dividend of $0.80 per share on the outstanding shares of common stock of the Company to the stockholders of record as of the close of business on November 4, 2019 (the “Special Dividend”) and (ii) the change in the estimated value of the Company’s investment in units of the SREIT (SGX-ST Ticker: “OXMU”) as of December 3, 2019. The change in the dividend reinvestment plan purchase price was effective for the January 2, 2020 dividend reinvestment plan purchase date and was effective until the estimated value per share was updated. Commencing with the January 2, 2020 purchase date and until the estimated value per share was updated, the purchase price per share under the dividend reinvestment plan was $11.07.
On December 7, 2020, the Company’s board of directors approved an estimated value per share of the Company’s common stock of $10.74 (unaudited) based on the estimated value of the Company’s assets less the estimated value of the Company’s liabilities, or net asset value, divided by the number of shares outstanding, all as of September 30, 2020, with the exception of adjustments to the Company’s net asset value to give effect to the change in the estimated value of the Company’s investment in units of the SREIT (SGX-ST Ticker: “OXMU”) as of December 1, 2020. The change in the dividend reinvestment plan purchase price was effective for the January 4, 2021 dividend reinvestment plan purchase date and was effective until the estimated value per share was updated. Commencing with the January 4, 2021 purchase date and until the estimated value per share was updated, the purchase price per share under the dividend reinvestment plan was $10.21.
On May 13, 2021, the Company’s board of directors approved an estimated value per share of the Company’s common stock of $10.77 (unaudited) based on the estimated value of the Company’s assets less the estimated value of the Company’s liabilities, or net asset value, divided by the number of shares outstanding, all as of March 31, 2021, with the exception of adjustments to the Company’s net asset value to give effect to the change in the estimated value of the Company’s investment in units of the SREIT (SGX-ST Ticker: OXMU) as of April 29, 2021. The change in the dividend reinvestment plan purchase price was effective for the June 1, 2021 dividend reinvestment plan purchase date and was effective until the estimated value per share was updated. Commencing with the June 1, 2021 purchase date and until the estimated value per share was updated, the purchase price per share under the dividend reinvestment plan was $10.23.
KBS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST III, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
December 31, 2021
2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)
On November 1, 2021, the Company’s board of directors approved an estimated value per share of the Company’s common stock of $10.78 (unaudited) based on the estimated value of the Company’s assets less the estimated value of the Company’s liabilities, or net asset value, divided by the number of shares outstanding, all as of September 30, 2021, with the exception of adjustments to the Company’s net asset value to give effect to (i) the change in the estimated value of the Company’s investment in units of the SREIT (SGX-ST Ticker: “OXMU”) as of October 22, 2021 and (ii) the contractual sales price less estimated disposition costs and fees of one property that was under contract to sell as of November 1, 2021. The change in the dividend reinvestment plan purchase price was effective for the December 1, 2021 dividend reinvestment plan purchase date and is effective until the estimated value per share is updated. Commencing with the December 1, 2021 purchase date and until the estimated value per share is updated, the purchase price per share under the dividend reinvestment plan is $10.24.
No selling commissions or dealer manager fees will be paid on shares sold under the dividend reinvestment plan. The board of directors of the Company may amend or terminate the dividend reinvestment plan for any reason upon ten days’ notice to participants.
Redeemable Common Stock
The Company’s board of directors has adopted a share redemption program that may enable stockholders to sell their shares to the Company in limited circumstances. The restrictions of the Company’s share redemption program will limit its stockholders’ ability to sell their shares should they require liquidity and will limit the stockholders’ ability to recover an amount equal to the Company’s estimated value per share. The following is a description of the Company’s share redemption program from January 1, 2019 through June 30, 2021 and the amendments to the program made by the amended and restated share redemption program (the “Amended Share Redemption Program”), which became effective as of the July 30, 2021 redemption date. On March 17, 2022, the Company's board of directors approved a further amendment to the Company’s share redemption program. See Note 12, “Subsequent Events - Amended and Restated Redemption Program.”
In December 2019, the Company’s board of directors determined to temporarily suspend Ordinary Redemptions under the share redemption program, and Ordinary Redemptions remained suspended through June 30, 2021. Ordinary Redemptions are all redemptions other than those that qualify for the special provisions for redemptions sought in connection with a stockholder’s death, “Qualifying Disability” or “Determination of Incompetence” (each as defined in the share redemption program and, together, “Special Redemptions”). Upon suspension, all Ordinary Redemption requests that had been received were cancelled and no Ordinary Redemption requests were accepted or collected during the suspension of the share redemption program. Further, on June 3, 2021, the Company announced that, in connection with the approval of the Self-Tender (defined below), the Company’s board of directors approved a temporary suspension of all redemptions under the share redemption program, including Special Redemptions. Upon suspension, all outstanding redemption requests under the share redemption program were cancelled, and no requests were accepted or collected under the share redemption program. As such, Special Redemptions under the share redemption program were suspended for the June 30, 2021 redemption date, meaning no Special Redemptions were made under the share redemption program in June 2021. Ordinary Redemptions and Special Redemptions resumed effective for the July 30, 2021 redemption date under the Amended Share Redemption Program.
In order to provide stockholders with additional liquidity that is in excess of that permitted under the Company’s share redemption program, on June 4, 2021, the Company commenced a self-tender offer (the “Self-Tender”) for up to 33,849,130 shares of common stock at a price of $10.34 per share, or approximately $350.0 million of shares. On July 12, 2021, the Company accepted for purchase 26,375,383 shares properly tendered and not properly withdrawn at a purchase price of $10.34 per share, or approximately $272.7 million of shares, excluding fees and expenses relating to the tender offer.
KBS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST III, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
December 31, 2021
2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)
There are several limitations on the Company’s ability to redeem shares under the share redemption program:
•Unless the shares are being redeemed in connection with a Special Redemption, the Company may not redeem shares unless the stockholder has held the shares for one year.
•Except as provided otherwise in the Amended Share Redemption Program with respect to calendar year 2021 only, during any calendar year, the share redemption program limits the number of shares the Company may redeem to those that the Company could purchase with the amount of net proceeds from the sale of shares under the dividend reinvestment plan during the prior calendar year, provided that once the Company has received requests for redemptions, whether in connection with Special Redemptions or otherwise, that if honored, and when combined with all prior redemptions made during the calendar year, would result in the amount of remaining funds available for the redemption of additional shares in such calendar year being $10.0 million or less, the last $10.0 million of available funds shall be reserved exclusively for Special Redemptions. Notwithstanding anything contained in the share redemption program to the contrary, the Company may increase or decrease the funding available for the redemption of shares pursuant to the program upon ten business days’ notice to its stockholders.
•Pursuant to the Amended Share Redemption Program, for calendar year 2021 only, the Company could redeem up to 5% of the weighted-average number of shares outstanding during the 2020 calendar year, provided that if the Company received requests for redemptions, whether in connection with Special Redemptions or otherwise, that if honored, and when combined with all prior redemptions made during the 2021 calendar year, would result in the number of remaining shares available for redemption in the 2021 calendar year being 500,000 or less, the last 500,000 shares available for redemption were reserved exclusively for Special Redemptions.
•During any calendar year, the Company may redeem no more than 5% of the weighted-average number of shares outstanding during the prior calendar year.
•The Company has no obligation to redeem shares if the redemption would violate the restrictions on distributions under Maryland General Corporation Law, as amended from time to time, which prohibits distributions that would cause a corporation to fail to meet statutory tests of solvency.
Pursuant to the share redemption program, redemptions made in connection with Special Redemptions are made at a price per share equal to the most recent estimated value per share of the Company’s common stock as of the applicable redemption date.
From January 1, 2019 through June 30, 2021, Ordinary Redemptions were made at a price per share equal to 95% of the Company’s most recent estimated value per share as of the applicable redemption date. Under the Amended Share Redemption Program, commencing with the July 30, 2021 redemption date, Ordinary Redemptions are made at a price per share equal to 96% of the Company’s most recent estimated value per share as of the applicable redemption date.
On December 3, 2018, the Company’s board of directors approved an estimated value per share of its common stock of $12.02 (unaudited) as described above under “- Dividend Reinvestment Plan.” This estimated value per share became effective for the December 2018 redemption date, which was December 31, 2018.
On December 4, 2019, the Company’s board of directors approved an estimated value per share of its common stock of $11.65 (unaudited) as described above under “- Dividend Reinvestment Plan.” This estimated value per share became effective for the December 2019 redemption date, which was December 31, 2019.
On December 7, 2020, the Company’s board of directors approved an estimated value per share of its common stock of $10.74 (unaudited) as described above under “- Dividend Reinvestment Plan.” This estimated value per share became effective for the December 2020 redemption date, which was December 31, 2020.
On May 13, 2021, the Company’s board of directors approved an estimated value per share of its common stock of $10.77 (unaudited) as described above under “- Dividend Reinvestment Plan.” This estimated value per share became effective for the May 2021 redemption date, which was May 28, 2021.
KBS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST III, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
December 31, 2021
2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)
On November 1, 2021, the Company’s board of directors approved an estimated value per share of its common stock of $10.78 (unaudited) as described above under “- Dividend Reinvestment Plan.” This estimated value per share became effective for the November 2021 redemption date, which was November 30, 2021. The Company currently expects to utilize an independent valuation firm to update its estimated value per share no later than December 2022.
For purposes of determining the time period a redeeming stockholder has held each share, the time period begins as of the date the stockholder acquired the share; provided, that shares purchased by the redeeming stockholder pursuant to the Company’s dividend reinvestment plan or received as a stock dividend will be deemed to have been acquired on the same date as the initial share to which the dividend reinvestment plan shares or stock dividend shares relate. The date of the share’s original issuance by the Company is not determinative.
The Company will classify as liabilities financial instruments that represent a mandatory obligation of the Company to redeem shares. The Company’s redeemable common shares are contingently redeemable at the option of the holder. When the Company determines it has a mandatory obligation to repurchase shares under the share redemption program, it will reclassify such obligations from temporary equity to a liability based upon their respective settlement values.
The Company may (a) amend, suspend or terminate the share redemption program for any reason, or (b) consistent with SEC guidance and interpretations, increase or decrease the funding available for the redemption of shares pursuant to the share redemption program, each upon ten business days’ notice to the Company’s stockholders. The Company may provide notice by including such information in a (i) Current Report on Form 8-K or in its annual or quarterly reports, all publicly filed with the SEC or (ii) separate mailing to the stockholders.
As of December 31, 2021, the Company had $42.4 million available for all redemptions in 2022 based on the share redemption program limitations as of December 31, 2021, including Special Redemptions.
Related Party Transactions
The Company has entered into the Advisory Agreement with the Advisor and the Dealer Manager Agreement with the Dealer Manager. These agreements entitled the Advisor and/or the Dealer Manager to specified fees upon the provision of certain services with regard to the Offering and reimbursement of organization and offering costs incurred by the Advisor and the Dealer Manager on behalf of the Company and entitle the Advisor to specified fees upon the provision of certain services with regard to the investment of funds in real estate investments, the management of those investments, among other services, and the disposition of investments, as well as entitle the Advisor and/or the Dealer Manager to reimbursement of offering costs related to the dividend reinvestment plan incurred by the Advisor and the Dealer Manager on behalf of the Company and certain costs incurred by the Advisor in providing services to the Company. In addition, the Advisor is entitled to certain other fees, including an incentive fee upon achieving certain performance goals, as detailed in the Advisory Agreement. The Company has also entered into a fee reimbursement agreement (the “AIP Reimbursement Agreement”) with the Dealer Manager pursuant to which the Company agreed to reimburse the Dealer Manager for certain fees and expenses it incurs for administering the Company’s participation in the DTCC Alternative Investment Product Platform with respect to certain accounts of the Company’s investors serviced through the platform. The Advisor and Dealer Manager also serve or served as the advisor and dealer manager, respectively, for KBS Real Estate Investment Trust II, Inc. (“KBS REIT II”) and KBS Growth & Income REIT, Inc. (“KBS Growth & Income REIT”).
The Company records all related party fees as incurred, subject to any limitations described in the Advisory Agreement, the Dealer Manager Agreement or the AIP Reimbursement Agreement. See Note 10, “Related Party Transactions.”
KBS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST III, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
December 31, 2021
2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)
Acquisition and Origination Fees
The Company pays the Advisor an acquisition fee equal to 1.0% of the cost of investments acquired, including the sum of the amount actually paid or allocated to the purchase, development, construction or improvement of such investments, acquisition expenses and any debt attributable to such investments. With respect to investments in and originations of loans, the Company pays an origination fee equal to 1.0% of the amount to be funded by the Company to acquire or originate mortgage, mezzanine, bridge or other loans, including any expenses related to such investments and any debt the Company uses to fund the acquisition or origination of these loans. The Company does not pay an acquisition fee with respect to investments in loans. No acquisition or origination fees were paid in connection with the Company’s investment in units of the SREIT or in connection with the Company’s origination of a real estate loan receivable in connection with providing seller financing in the sale of a multifamily apartment complex held through a consolidated joint venture (“Hardware Village”).
Operating Expenses
Under the Advisory Agreement, the Advisor has the right to seek reimbursement from the Company for all costs and expenses it incurs in connection with the provision of services to the Company, including the Company’s allocable share of the Advisor’s overhead, such as rent, employee costs, utilities, accounting software and cybersecurity costs. The Company also reimburses the Advisor for the Company’s allocable portion of the salaries, benefits and overhead of internal audit department personnel providing services to the Company. In the future, the Advisor may seek reimbursement for additional employee costs. The Company currently does not reimburse the Advisor for employee costs in connection with services for which the Advisor earns acquisition, origination or disposition fees (other than reimbursement of travel and communication expenses) or for the salaries and benefits the Advisor or its affiliates may pay to the Company’s executive officers. In addition, the Company reimburses the Advisor for certain of the Company’s direct costs incurred from third parties that were initially paid by the Advisor on behalf of the Company.
Asset Management Fee
With respect to investments in real estate, the Company pays the Advisor a monthly asset management fee equal to one-twelfth of 0.75% of the amount paid or allocated to acquire the investment, plus the cost of any subsequent development, construction or improvements to the property. This amount includes any portion of the investment that was debt financed and is inclusive of acquisition expenses related thereto (but excludes acquisition fees paid or payable to the Advisor). In the case of investments made through joint ventures, the asset management fee will be determined based on the Company’s proportionate share of the underlying investment.
With respect to investments in loans and any investments other than real estate, the Company pays the Advisor a monthly fee calculated, each month, as one-twelfth of 0.75% of the lesser of (i) the amount paid or allocated to acquire or fund the loan or other investment (which amount includes any portion of the investment that is debt financed and is inclusive of acquisition or origination expenses related thereto but is exclusive of acquisition or origination fees paid or payable to the Advisor) and (ii) the outstanding principal amount of such loan or other investment, plus the acquisition or origination expenses related to the acquisition or funding of such investment (but excluding acquisition or origination fees paid or payable to the Advisor), as of the time of calculation.
No asset management fee is currently paid on the Company’s investment in units of the SREIT.
Pursuant to the Advisory Agreement, with respect to asset management fees accruing from March 1, 2014, the Advisor has agreed to defer, without interest, the Company’s obligation to pay asset management fees for any month in which the Company’s modified funds from operations (“MFFO”) for such month, as such term is defined in the practice guideline issued by the Institute of Portfolio Alternatives (“IPA”) in November 2010 and interpreted by the Company, excluding asset management fees, does not exceed the amount of distributions declared by the Company for record dates of that month. The Company remains obligated to pay the Advisor an asset management fee in any month in which the Company’s MFFO, excluding asset management fees, for such month exceeds the amount of distributions declared for the record dates of that month (such excess amount, an “MFFO Surplus”); however, any amount of such asset management fee in excess of the MFFO Surplus will also be deferred under the Advisory Agreement. If the MFFO Surplus for any month exceeds the amount of the asset management fee payable for such month, any remaining MFFO Surplus will be applied to pay any asset management fee amounts previously deferred in accordance with the Advisory Agreement.
KBS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST III, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
December 31, 2021
2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)
However, notwithstanding the foregoing, any and all deferred asset management fees that are unpaid will become immediately due and payable at such time as the Company’s stockholders have received, together as a collective group, aggregate distributions (including distributions that may constitute a return of capital for federal income tax purposes) sufficient to provide (i) an 8.0% per year cumulative, noncompounded return on such net invested capital (the “Stockholders’ 8% Return”) and (ii) a return of their net invested capital, or the amount calculated by multiplying the total number of shares purchased by stockholders by the issue price, reduced by any amounts to repurchase shares pursuant to the Company’s share redemption program. The Stockholders’ 8% Return is not based on the return provided to any individual stockholder. Accordingly, it is not necessary for each of the Company’s stockholders to have received any minimum return in order for the Advisor to receive deferred asset management fees.
Disposition Fee
For substantial assistance in connection with the sale of properties or other investments, the Company pays the Advisor or one of its affiliates 1.0% of the contract sales price of each property or other investment sold; provided, however, that if, in connection with such disposition, commissions are paid to third parties unaffiliated with the Advisor or one of its affiliates, the fee paid to the Advisor or one of its affiliates may not exceed the commissions paid to such unaffiliated third parties, and provided further that the disposition fees paid to the Advisor or one of its affiliates and unaffiliated third parties may not exceed 6.0% of the contract sales price. The Company will not pay a disposition fee upon the maturity, prepayment or workout of a loan or other debt-related investment, provided that if the Company takes ownership of a property as a result of a workout or foreclosure of a loan, the Company will pay a disposition fee upon the sale of such property. No disposition fees will be paid with respect to any sales of the Company’s investment in units of the SREIT.
Income Taxes
The Company has elected to be taxed as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. To continue to qualify as a REIT, the Company must continue to meet certain organizational and operational requirements, including a requirement to distribute at least 90% of the Company’s annual REIT taxable income to stockholders (which is computed without regard to the dividends-paid deduction or net capital gain and which does not necessarily equal net income as calculated in accordance with GAAP). As a REIT, the Company generally will not be subject to federal income tax on income that it distributes as dividends to its stockholders. If the Company fails to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, it will be subject to federal income tax on its taxable income at regular corporate income tax rates and generally will not be permitted to qualify for treatment as a REIT for federal income tax purposes for the four taxable years following the year during which qualification is lost, unless the Internal Revenue Service grants the Company relief under certain statutory provisions. Such an event could materially and adversely affect the Company’s net income and net cash available for distribution to stockholders. However, the Company believes that it is organized and operates in such a manner as to qualify for treatment as a REIT.
The Company has concluded that there are no significant uncertain tax positions requiring recognition in its financial statements. Neither the Company nor its subsidiaries has been assessed interest or penalties by any major tax jurisdictions. The Company’s evaluations were performed for all open tax years through December 31, 2021. As of December 31, 2021, the returns for calendar years 2017 through 2020 remain subject to examination by major tax jurisdictions.
Per Share Data
Basic net income (loss) per share of common stock is calculated by dividing net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders by the weighted-average number of shares of common stock issued and outstanding during such period. Diluted net income (loss) per share of common stock equals basic net income (loss) per share of common stock as there were no potentially dilutive securities outstanding during the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019, respectively.
On October 23, 2019, the Company’s board of directors authorized the Special Dividend in the amount of $0.80 per share of common stock to stockholders of record as of the close of business on November 4, 2019. Accordingly, on December 12, 2019, the Company paid $48.5 million (35%) in cash and issued $90.0 million (65%) in stock pursuant to the Special Dividend.
KBS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST III, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
December 31, 2021
2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)
Distributions declared per common share were $0.598, $0.598 and $1.450 during the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019, respectively, including the Special Dividend paid in December 2019. Distributions declared per common share assumes each share was issued and outstanding each day that was a record date for distributions during the period commencing January 2019 through December 2021 and during this period, other than the Special Dividend, distributions were based on a monthly record date. For each monthly record date for distributions during the period from January 1, 2019 through December 31, 2019, distributions were calculated at a rate of $0.05416667 per share. For each monthly record date for distributions during the period from January 1, 2020 through December 31, 2021, distributions were calculated at a rate of $0.04983333 per share.
Segments
The Company has invested in core real estate properties and real estate-related investments with the goal of acquiring a portfolio of income-producing investments. The Company’s real estate properties exhibit similar long-term financial performance and have similar economic characteristics to each other. Accordingly, the Company aggregated its investments in real estate properties into one reportable business segment.
Square Footage, Occupancy and Other Measures
Square footage, occupancy, number of tenants and other measures, including annualized base rent and annualized base rent per square foot, used to describe real estate investments included in these notes to the consolidated financial statements are presented on an unaudited basis.
Recently Issued Accounting Standards Update
In March 2020, the FASB issued ASU No. 2020-04, Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848): Facilitation of the Effects of Reference Rate Reform on Financial Reporting (“ASU No. 2020-04”) to provide temporary optional expedients and exceptions to the guidance in GAAP on contract modifications and hedge accounting to ease the financial reporting burdens related to the expected market transition from the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) and other interbank offered rates to alternative reference rates, such as the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (“SOFR”). Modified contracts that meet the following criteria are eligible for relief from the modification accounting requirements under GAAP: (1) the contract references LIBOR or another rate that is expected to be discontinued due to reference rate reform, (2) the modified terms directly replace or have the potential to replace the reference rate that is expected to be discontinued due to reference rate reform, and (3) any contemporaneous changes to other terms (i.e., those that do not directly replace or have the potential to replace the reference rate) that change or have the potential to change the amount and timing of contractual cash flows must be related to the replacement of the reference rate. For a contract that meets the criteria, the guidance generally allows an entity to account for and present modifications as an event that does not require contract remeasurement at the modification date or reassessment of a previous accounting determination. That is, the modified contract is accounted for as a continuation of the existing contract. In addition, ASU No. 2020-04 provides various optional expedients for hedging relationships affected by reference rate reform, if certain criteria are met. The amendments in ASU No. 2020-04 are effective for all entities as of March 12, 2020 through December 31, 2022. An entity may elect to apply the amendments for contract modifications by Topic or Industry Subtopic as of any date from the beginning of an interim period that includes or is subsequent to March 12, 2020, or prospectively from a date within an interim period that includes or is subsequent to March 12, 2020, up to the date that the financial statements are available to be issued. Once elected for a Topic or an Industry Subtopic, the amendments in this update must be applied prospectively for all eligible contract modifications for that Topic or Industry Subtopic. An entity may elect to apply the amendments in ASU No. 2020-04 to eligible hedging relationships existing as of the beginning of the interim period that includes March 12, 2020 and to new eligible hedging relationships entered into after the beginning of the interim period that includes March 12, 2020.
For the period from January 1, 2020 (the earliest date the Company may elect to apply ASU No. 2020-04) through December 31, 2021, the Company did not have any contract modifications that meet the criteria described above, specifically contract modifications that have been modified from LIBOR to an alternative reference rate. Certain of the Company’s loan agreements, derivative instruments, and lease agreements use LIBOR as the current reference rate. For eligible contract modifications, the Company expects to adopt the temporary optional expedients described in ASU No. 2020-04. The optional expedients for hedging relationships described in ASU No. 2020-04 are not expected to have an impact to the Company as the Company has elected to not designate its derivative instruments as a hedge.
KBS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST III, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
December 31, 2021
2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)
In April 2020, the FASB issued a FASB Staff Q&A related to Topic 842 and Topic 840: Accounting for Lease Concessions Related to the Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic (“Topic 842 Q&A”). The Company adopted the lease accounting standards of Topic 842 beginning January 1, 2019. Under Topic 842, subsequent changes to lease payments that are not stipulated in the original lease contract are generally accounted for as lease modifications. Some contracts may contain explicit or implicit enforceable rights and obligations that require lease concessions if certain circumstances arise that are beyond the control of the parties to the contract. If a lease contract provides enforceable rights and obligations for concessions in the contract and no changes are made to that contract, the concessions are not accounted for under the lease modification guidance in Topic 842. If concessions granted by lessors are beyond the enforceable rights and obligations in the contract, entities would generally account for those concessions in accordance with the lease modification guidance in Topic 842. Because of the unprecedented and global nature of the COVID-19 pandemic, the FASB staff is aware that it may be exceedingly challenging for entities to determine whether existing contracts provide enforceable rights and obligations for lease concessions and whether those concessions are consistent with the terms of the contract or are modifications to the contract. As such, the FASB staff believes that it would be acceptable for entities to make an election to account for lease concessions related to the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic consistent with how those concessions would be accounted for under Topic 842 as though enforceable rights and obligations for those concessions existed (regardless of whether those enforceable rights and obligations for the concessions explicitly exist in the contract). Consequently, for concessions related to the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, an entity will not have to analyze each contract to determine whether enforceable rights and obligations for concessions exist in the contract and can elect to apply or not apply the lease modification guidance in Topic 842 to those contracts. This election is available for concessions related to the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic that do not result in a substantial increase in the rights of the lessor or the obligations of the lessee. For example, this election is available for concessions that result in the total payments required by the modified contract being substantially the same as or less than total payments required by the original contract. The FASB staff expects that reasonable judgment will be exercised in making those determinations. Some concessions will provide a deferral of payments with no substantive changes to the consideration in the original contract. A deferral affects the timing, but the amount of the consideration is substantially the same as that required by the original contract. The staff expects that there will be multiple ways to account for those deferrals, none of which the staff believes are more preferable than the others. Two of those methods are: (1) Account for the concessions as if no changes to the lease contract were made. Under that accounting, a lessor would increase its lease receivable, and a lessee would increase its accounts payable as receivables/payments accrue. In its income statement, a lessor would continue to recognize income, and a lessee would continue to recognize expense during the deferral period and (2) Account for the deferred payments as variable lease payments.
In accordance with the Topic 842 Q&A, the Company made the election to account for lease concessions related to the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic that do not result in a substantial increase in the rights of the Company as lessor consistent with how those concessions would be accounted for under Topic 842 as though enforceable rights and obligations for those concessions existed. Accordingly, the Company does not analyze each contract to determine whether enforceable rights and obligations for concessions exist in the contract and elected not to apply the lease modification guidance in Topic 842. For deferrals, the Company accounts for the concessions as if no changes to the lease contract were made and continues to recognize rental income during the deferral period. The amount of deferred rent is assessed for collectability at the end of each reporting period. For rental abatements, the Company recognizes negative variable lease income for the forgiven rent, thereby reversing the rental income and rent receivable for the abated period.
The Company has granted a number of lease concessions related to the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic but these lease concessions did not have a material impact to the Company’s consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2021 and 2020 or consolidated statements of operations for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020. As of December 31, 2021, the Company had entered into lease amendments related to the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, granting $4.2 million of rent deferrals for the period from March 2020 through September 2021 and granting $2.9 million in rental abatements.
As of December 31, 2021, the Company had $1.4 million of receivables for lease payments that had been deferred as lease concessions related to the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, of which $1.1 million was reserved for payments not probable of collection, which were included in rent and other receivables, net on the accompanying consolidated balance sheet. For the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, the Company recorded $1.2 million and $1.5 million, respectively, of rental abatements granted to tenants as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic.
KBS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST III, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
December 31, 2021
2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)
Tenants may request additional lease concessions, in the form of rent deferrals or abatements, for future periods, which may have an impact on the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations, but the ultimate impact will largely depend on future developments with respect to the continued spread and treatment of the virus, the actions taken to contain the pandemic or mitigate its impact, and the direct and indirect economic effects of the pandemic and containment measures, which the Company cannot accurately predict.
3. REAL ESTATE
As of December 31, 2021, the Company’s real estate portfolio was composed of 16 office properties and one mixed-use office/retail property encompassing in the aggregate approximately 7.3 million rentable square feet. As of December 31, 2021, the Company’s real estate portfolio was collectively 85% occupied. The following table summarizes the Company’s investments in real estate as of December 31, 2021 (in thousands):
Property Date Acquired City State Property Type Total Real Estate, at Cost (1)
Accumulated Depreciation and Amortization (1)
Total Real Estate, Net (1)
Town Center 03/27/2012 Plano TX Office $ 133,177 $ (43,348) $ 89,829
McEwen Building 04/30/2012 Franklin TN Office 37,749 (9,364) 28,385
Gateway Tech Center 05/09/2012 Salt Lake City UT Office 31,587 (8,726) 22,861
RBC Plaza 01/31/2013 Minneapolis MN Office 144,859 (47,996) 96,863
Preston Commons 06/19/2013 Dallas TX Office 138,743 (32,179) 106,564
Sterling Plaza 06/19/2013 Dallas TX Office 87,795 (23,791) 64,004
201 Spear Street 12/03/2013 San Francisco CA Office 151,309 (31,187) 120,122
Accenture Tower 12/16/2013 Chicago IL Office 489,253 (119,402) 369,851
Ten Almaden 12/05/2014 San Jose CA Office 130,588 (32,197) 98,391
Towers at Emeryville 12/23/2014 Emeryville CA Office 214,249 (47,793) 166,456
3003 Washington Boulevard 12/30/2014 Arlington VA Office 152,239 (36,070) 116,169
Park Place Village 06/18/2015 Leawood KS Office/Retail 80,986 (6,214) 74,772
201 17th Street 06/23/2015 Atlanta GA Office 103,842 (28,200) 75,642
515 Congress 08/31/2015 Austin TX Office 130,185 (25,197) 104,988
The Almaden 09/23/2015 San Jose CA Office 189,307 (36,883) 152,424
3001 Washington Boulevard 11/06/2015 Arlington VA Office 60,867 (10,870) 49,997
Carillon 01/15/2016 Charlotte NC Office 164,531 (33,551) 130,980
$ 2,441,266 $ (572,968) $ 1,868,298
_____________________
(1) Amounts presented are net of impairment charges and write-offs of fully depreciated/amortized assets.
As of December 31, 2021, the following property represented more than 10% of the Company’s total assets:
Property Location Rentable Square Feet Total Real Estate, Net
(in thousands) Percentage of Total Assets Annualized Base Rent (in thousands) (1)
Average Annualized Base Rent per sq. ft. Occupancy
Accenture Tower Chicago, IL 1,457,724 $ 369,851 16.4 % $ 27,481 $ 26.67 70.7 %
_____________________
(1) Annualized base rent represents annualized contractual base rental income as of December 31, 2021, adjusted to straight-line any contractual tenant concessions (including free rent), rent increases and rent decreases from the lease’s inception through the balance of the lease term.
KBS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST III, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
December 31, 2021
3. REAL ESTATE (CONTINUED)
Operating Leases
The Company’s office and office/retail properties are leased to tenants under operating leases for which the terms and expirations vary. As of December 31, 2021, the leases, including leases that have been executed but not yet commenced, had remaining terms, excluding options to extend, of up to 17.4 years with a weighted-average remaining term of 5.3 years. Some of the leases have provisions to extend the term of the leases, options for early termination for all or a part of the leased premises after paying a specified penalty, and other terms and conditions as negotiated. The Company retains substantially all of the risks and benefits of ownership of the real estate assets leased to tenants. Generally, upon the execution of a lease, the Company requires a security deposit from the tenant in the form of a cash deposit and/or a letter of credit. The amount required as a security deposit varies depending upon the terms of the respective lease and the creditworthiness of the tenant, but generally is not a significant amount. Therefore, exposure to credit risk exists to the extent that a receivable from a tenant exceeds the amount of its security deposit. Security deposits received in cash related to tenant leases are included in other liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and totaled $8.7 million and $8.6 million as of December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively.
During the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019, the Company recognized deferred rent from tenants of $2.6 million, $4.6 million and $6.2 million, respectively. As of December 31, 2021 and 2020, the cumulative deferred rent balance was $85.2 million and $80.7 million, respectively, and is included in rents and other receivables on the accompanying balance sheets. The cumulative deferred rent balance included $22.8 million and $19.1 million of unamortized lease incentives as of December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively.
As of December 31, 2021, the future minimum rental income from the Company’s properties under its non-cancelable operating leases was as follows (in thousands):
2022 $ 199,591
2023 177,283
2024 166,774
2025 149,594
2026 131,097
Thereafter 493,972
$ 1,318,311
As of December 31, 2021, the Company’s office and office/retail properties were leased to approximately 570 tenants over a diverse range of industries and geographic areas. The Company’s highest tenant industry concentrations (greater than 10% of annualized base rent) were as follows:
Industry Number of Tenants Annualized Base Rent (1)
(in thousands)
Percentage of Annualized Base Rent
Finance 112 $ 46,214 21.4 %
Real Estate 57 22,890 10.6 %
$ 69,104 32.0 %
_____________________
(1) Annualized base rent represents annualized contractual base rental income as of December 31, 2021, adjusted to straight-line any contractual tenant concessions (including free rent), rent increases and rent decreases from the lease’s inception through the balance of the lease term.
As of December 31, 2021, no other tenant industries accounted for more than 10% of annualized base rent and no tenant accounted for more than 10% of annualized base rent.
KBS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST III, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
December 31, 2021
3. REAL ESTATE (CONTINUED)
Geographic Concentration Risk
As of December 31, 2021, the Company’s net investments in real estate in California, Illinois and Texas represented 23.8%, 16.4%, and 16.2% of the Company’s total assets, respectively. As a result, the geographic concentration of the Company’s portfolio makes it particularly susceptible to adverse economic developments in the California, Illinois and Texas real estate markets. Any adverse economic or real estate developments in these markets, such as business layoffs or downsizing, industry slowdowns, relocations of businesses, changing demographics and other factors, or any decrease in demand for office space resulting from the local business climate, could adversely affect the Company’s operating results and its ability to pay distributions to stockholders.
Impairment of Real Estate
The Company did not record any impairment charges on its real estate properties during the year ended December 31, 2021. During the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, the Company recorded impairment charges of $19.9 million and $8.7 million, respectively, to write down the carrying value of an office/retail property to its estimated fair value as a result of changes in cash flow estimates, including a change to the anticipated hold period of the property, which triggered the future estimated undiscounted cash flows to be lower than the net carrying value of the property. The decrease in cash flow projections was primarily due to the continued lack of demand for the property’s retail component resulting in longer than estimated lease-up periods and lower projected rental rates, mostly due to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic with respect to the impairment charge for the year ended December 31, 2020. As a result, many retail tenants have requested rent concessions as their businesses have been severely impacted.
4. REAL ESTATE DISPOSITIONS
During the year ended December 31, 2021, the Company sold two office properties to purchasers unaffiliated with the Company or the Advisor. In November 2021, the Company completed the sale of one office property for $143.0 million, before third-party closing costs, closing credits and disposition fees payable to the Advisor, and in January 2021, the Company sold one office property for $103.5 million, before third-party closing costs, credits and disposition fees payable to the Advisor. The Company recognized a gain on sale of $114.3 million related to these dispositions. As of December 31, 2021, the Company did not have any real estate properties held for sale.
During the year ended December 31, 2020, the Company sold Hardware Village to a buyer unaffiliated with the joint venture, the Company or the Advisor for $178.0 million, before third-party closing costs, credits and the disposition fee payable to the Advisor. The Company recognized a gain on sale of $49.5 million related to the disposition of Hardware Village. In connection with the sale, the Company, through an indirect wholly owned subsidiary, provided seller financing to the purchaser by originating a real estate loan receivable, which was paid off in full in December 2020.
During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company, through 12 indirect wholly owned subsidiaries, sold 11 of its properties (the “Singapore Portfolio”) to various subsidiaries of the SREIT, which was listed on the Singapore Exchange Securities Trading Limited (“SGX-ST”) on July 19, 2019 (the “Singapore Transaction”). The Singapore Portfolio consisted of the following properties: Tower I at Emeryville, Emeryville, California; 222 Main, Salt Lake City, Utah; Village Center Station, Greenwood Village, Colorado; Village Center Station II, Greenwood Village, Colorado; 101 South Hanley, St. Louis, Missouri; Tower on Lake Carolyn, Irving, Texas; Promenade I & II at Eilan, San Antonio, Texas; CrossPoint at Valley Forge, Wayne, Pennsylvania; One Washingtonian Center, Gaithersburg, Maryland; Reston Square, Reston, Virginia; and 171 17th Street, Atlanta, Georgia. The Company sold the Singapore Portfolio to the SREIT on July 18, 2019. The sale price of the Singapore Portfolio was $1.2 billion, before third-party closing costs, closing credits and other costs of approximately $20.0 million and excluding disposition fees paid to the Advisor of $9.5 million. The Company recognized a gain on sale of $327.2 million related to the disposition of the Singapore Portfolio.
KBS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST III, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
December 31, 2021
4. REAL ESTATE DISPOSITIONS (CONTINUED)
The following summary presents the major components of assets and liabilities related to real estate held for sale as of December 31, 2020 (in thousands). No real estate properties were held for sale as of December 31, 2021:
December 31, 2020
Real estate held for sale, net:
Total real estate, at cost $ 167,407
Accumulated depreciation and amortization (35,264)
Real estate held for sale, net 132,143
Other assets 13,091
Total assets related to real estate held for sale $ 145,234
Liabilities related to real estate held for sale:
Notes payable, net $ 29,897
Other liabilities 21,001
Total liabilities related to real estate held for sale $ 50,898
The results of operations for the properties sold during the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019 are included in continuing operations on the Company’s consolidated statements of operations. The following table summarizes certain revenues and expenses related to the Company’s real estate properties that were sold during the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019, which were included in continuing operations (in thousands):
Years Ended December 31,
2021 2020 2019
Revenues
Rental income $ 7,930 $ 14,169 $ 81,049
Other operating income 150 1,168 7,196
Total revenues $ 8,080 $ 15,337 $ 88,245
Expenses
Operating, maintenance, and management $ 120 $ 4,091 $ 21,752
Real estate taxes and insurance - 2,040 12,475
Asset management fees to affiliate 412 1,509 6,215
General and administrative expenses - 163 103
Depreciation and amortization 2,429 6,104 36,211
Interest expense 681 2,463 21,435
Total expenses $ 3,642 $ 16,370 $ 98,191
KBS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST III, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
December 31, 2021
5. TENANT ORIGINATION AND ABSORPTION COSTS, ABOVE-MARKET LEASE ASSETS AND BELOW
MARKET LEASE LIABILITIES
As of December 31, 2021 and 2020, the Company’s tenant origination and absorption costs, above-market lease assets and below-market lease liabilities (excluding fully amortized assets and liabilities and accumulated amortization) were as follows (in thousands):
Tenant Origination and
Absorption Costs Above-Market
Lease Assets Below-Market
Lease Liabilities
December 31,
2021 December 31,
2020 December 31,
2021 December 31,
2020 December 31,
2021 December 31,
Cost $ 60,162 $ 75,664 $ 1,112 $ 1,146 $ (15,395) $ (20,239)
Accumulated Amortization (41,387) (48,714) (764) (697) 12,118 14,123
Net Amount $ 18,775 $ 26,950 $ 348 $ 449 $ (3,277) $ (6,116)
Increases (decreases) in net income as a result of amortization of the Company’s tenant origination and absorption costs, above-market lease assets and below-market lease liabilities for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019 were as follows (in thousands):
Tenant Origination and
Absorption Costs Above-Market
Lease Assets Below-Market
Lease Liabilities
For the Years Ended December 31, For the Years Ended December 31, For the Years Ended December 31,
2021 2020 2019 2021 2020 2019 2021 2020 2019
Amortization $ (8,175) $ (9,971) $ (21,072) $ (101) $ (117) $ (955) $ 2,855 $ 2,924 $ 4,470
The remaining unamortized balance for these outstanding intangible assets and liabilities as of December 31, 2021 is estimated to be amortized for the years ending December 31 as follows (in thousands):
Tenant Origination and
Absorption Costs Above-Market
Lease Assets Below-Market
Lease Liabilities
2022 $ (5,740) $ (86) $ 1,365
2023 (3,896) (73) 833
2024 (2,765) (69) 534
2025 (2,311) (68) 314
2026 (1,741) (52) 198
Thereafter (2,322) - 33
$ (18,775) $ (348) $ 3,277
Weighted-Average Remaining Amortization Period 4.8 years 4.5 years 3.2 years
KBS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST III, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
December 31, 2021
6. REAL ESTATE EQUITY SECURITIES
Investment in Prime US REIT
In connection with the Singapore Transaction, on July 19, 2019, the Company, through an indirect wholly owned subsidiary (“REIT Properties III”), acquired 307,953,999 units in the SREIT at a price of $271.0 million, or $0.88 per unit, representing a 33.3% ownership interest in the SREIT. On August 21, 2019, REIT Properties III sold 18,392,100 of its units in the SREIT for $16.2 million pursuant to an over-allotment option granted to the underwriters of the SREIT’s offering, reducing REIT Properties III’s ownership in the SREIT to 31.3% of the outstanding units of the SREIT as of that date. On November 9, 2021, REIT Properties III sold 73,720,000 of its units in the SREIT for $58.9 million, net of fees and costs, reducing REIT Properties III’s ownership in the SREIT to 18.5% of the outstanding units of the SREIT as of that date. As of December 31, 2021, REIT Properties III held 215,841,899 units of the SREIT which represented 18.5% of the outstanding units of the SREIT. As of December 31, 2021, the aggregate book value and fair value of the Company’s investment in the units of the SREIT was $180.2 million, which was based on the closing price of the SREIT units on the SGX-ST of $0.835 per unit as of December 31, 2021.
For the period from July 19, 2019 through November 8, 2021, the Company concluded that based on its ownership interest, it exercised significant influence over the operations, financial policies and decision making with respect to the SREIT. Accordingly, the Company accounted for its investment in the SREIT during this period under the equity method of accounting. Income was allocated according to the Company’s ownership interest at each month-end and recorded as equity income (loss) from unconsolidated entity. Any dividends received from the SREIT reduced the carrying amount of the investment.
On November 9, 2021, upon the Company’s sale of 73,720,000 units in the SREIT, the Company determined that based on its ownership interest of 18.5% of the outstanding units of the SREIT, it no longer had significant influence over the operations, financial policies and decision making with respect to the SREIT. Accordingly, effective November 9, 2021, the Company’s investment in the units of the SREIT represent an investment in marketable securities and is therefore presented at fair value at each reporting date based on the closing price of the SREIT units on the SGX-ST on that date and dividend income is recognized as it is declared based on eligible units as of the ex-dividend date. During the period from November 9, 2021 through December 31, 2021, the Company recorded an unrealized gain on real estate equity securities of $16.8 million.
During the period from January 1, 2021 through November 8, 2021, the Company recorded equity in income from an unconsolidated entity of $8.7 million, related to its investment in the SREIT. Equity in income from an unconsolidated entity during the period from January 1, 2021 through November 8, 2021 included a gain of $3.1 million related to the Company’s sale of 73,720,000 units in the SREIT on November 9, 2021 and a gain of $1.1 million to reflect the net effect to the Company’s investment as a result of the net proceeds raised by the SREIT in a private offering in July 2021. During the year ended December 31, 2020, the Company recorded equity in loss from an unconsolidated entity of $0.5 million, related to its investment in the SREIT. Equity in loss from an unconsolidated entity for the year ended December 31, 2020 included $2.6 million related to the Company’s share of net losses from the SREIT offset by a gain of $2.1 million to reflect the net effect to the Company’s investment as a result of the net proceeds raised by the SREIT in a private offering in February 2020. For the period from July 19, 2019 to December 31, 2019, the Company recorded $1.4 million of equity in loss from an unconsolidated entity related to its investment in the SREIT.
During the period from January 1, 2021 through November 8, 2021 and for the year ended December 31, 2020, the Company received $19.9 million and $19.3 million, respectively, of dividends from its investment in the SREIT, which was recorded as a reduction of the Company’s carrying value of its equity method investment. The Company elected to apply the nature of the distribution approach for purposes of presentation of the dividends on the statement of consolidated cash flows and classified the dividends received as operating activities on the statement of consolidated cash flows. The nature of the distribution approach requires the Company to classify distributions from equity method investments on the basis of the nature of the activities of the investee that generated the distribution as either a return on investment (classified as a cash inflow of operating activities) or a return of investment (classified as a cash inflow from investing activities) when such information is available.
KBS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST III, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
December 31, 2021
7. NOTES PAYABLE
As of December 31, 2021 and 2020, the Company’s notes payable, including notes payable related to real estate held for sale, consisted of the following (dollars in thousands):
Book Value as of
December 31, 2021 Book Value as of
December 31, 2020 Contractual Interest Rate as of
December 31, 2021 (1)
Effective
Interest Rate as of
December 31, 2021 (1)
Payment Type Maturity Date (2)
The Almaden Mortgage Loan (3)
$ 123,000 $ 123,000 3.65% 3.65% Interest Only 12/01/2023
201 Spear Street Mortgage Loan 125,000 125,000 One-month LIBOR + 1.45%
1.55% Interest Only 01/05/2024
Carillon Mortgage Loan (4)
105,800 88,800 One-month LIBOR + 1.40%
1.50% Interest Only 04/11/2024
Modified Portfolio Loan Facility (5)
- 472,950 (5) (5) (5) (5)
Modified Portfolio Revolving Loan Facility (6)
196,595 162,500 One-month LIBOR + 1.50%
1.60% Interest Only 03/01/2023
3001 & 3003 Washington Mortgage Loan 143,245 143,245 One-month LIBOR + 1.45%
1.55% Interest Only (7)
06/01/2024
Accenture Tower Revolving Loan (8)
281,250 281,250 One-month LIBOR + 2.25%
2.35% Interest Only 11/02/2023
Unsecured Credit Facility (9)
37,500 - One-month LIBOR + 2.10%
2.20% Interest Only 07/30/2023
Amended and Restated Portfolio Loan Facility (10)
459,900 - One-month BSBY + 1.80%
1.89% Interest only 11/03/2023
Total notes payable principal outstanding $ 1,472,290 $ 1,396,745
Deferred financing costs, net (6,892) (8,380)
Total Notes Payable, net $ 1,465,398 $ 1,388,365
_____________________
(1) Contractual interest rate represents the interest rate in effect under the loan as of December 31, 2021. Effective interest rate is calculated as the actual interest rate in effect as of December 31, 2021, consisting of the contractual interest rate and using interest rate indices as of December 31, 2021, where applicable. For information regarding the Company’s derivative instruments, see Note 8, “Derivative Instruments.”
(2) Represents the maturity date as of December 31, 2021; subject to certain conditions, the maturity dates of certain loans may be extended beyond the dates shown.
(3) As of December 31, 2021, The Almaden Mortgage Loan has two 12-month extension options, subject to certain terms, conditions and fees as described in the loan documents. The Almaden Mortgage Loan bears interest at a fixed rate of 3.65% for the initial term of the loan and a floating rate of 350 basis points over one-month LIBOR during the extension options, subject to a minimum interest rate of 3.65%.
(4) As of December 31, 2021, the borrowing capacity under the Carillon Mortgage Loan was $111.0 million, of which $88.8 million is term debt and $22.2 million is revolving debt. As of December 31, 2021, the outstanding balance under the loan consisted of $88.8 million of term debt and $17.0 million of revolving debt. As of December 31, 2021, an additional $5.2 million of revolving debt remained available for future disbursements, subject to certain terms and conditions set forth in the loan documents.
(5) On the loan maturity date of November 3, 2021, the Company paid off the Modified Portfolio Loan Facility and refinanced the properties secured by this loan facility. See below, “- Recent Financing Transactions - Amended and Restated Portfolio Loan Facility.”
(6) On November 2, 2021, in connection with the disposition of Domain Gateway, the Company repaid $69.7 million of principal due under this loan and Domain Gateway was released as security from the Modified Portfolio Revolving Loan Facility. As of December 31, 2021, the Modified Portfolio Revolving Loan Facility was secured by 515 Congress, the McEwen Building, Gateway Tech Center and 201 17th Street. As of December 31, 2021, the face amount of the Modified Portfolio Revolving Loan Facility was $249.2 million, of which $124.6 million is term debt and $124.6 million is revolving debt. As of December 31, 2021, the outstanding balance under the loan consisted of $124.6 million of term debt and $72.0 million of revolving debt. As of December 31, 2021, an additional $52.6 million of revolving debt remained available upon satisfaction of certain loan conditions set forth in the loan documents. The Modified Portfolio Revolving Loan Facility has two 12-month extension options, subject to certain terms, conditions and fees as described in the loan documents.
(7) Represents the payment type required as of December 31, 2021. Certain future monthly payments due under the loan also include amortizing principal payments. For more information on the Company’s contractual obligations under its notes payable, see the five-year maturity table below.
(8) As of December 31, 2021, the outstanding balance under the Accenture Tower Revolving Loan consisted of $281.3 million of term debt and an additional $93.7 million of revolving debt remained available for future disbursements, subject to certain terms and conditions contained in the loan documents. As of December 31, 2021, the Accenture Tower Revolving Loan has two 12-month extension options, subject to certain terms and conditions contained in the loan documents.
(9) See below, “- Recent Financing Transactions - Unsecured Credit Facility.”
(10) See below, “- Recent Financing Transactions - Amended and Restated Portfolio Loan Facility.”
KBS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST III, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
December 31, 2021
7. NOTES PAYABLE (CONTINUED)
During the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019, the Company incurred $29.3 million, $81.1 million and $114.3 million of interest expense, respectively. Included in interest expense was: (i) the amortization of deferred financing costs of $4.0 million, $4.3 million and $5.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019, respectively, and (ii) interest expense (including gains and losses) incurred as a result of the Company’s derivative instruments, which decreased interest expense by $5.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2021 and increased interest expense by $39.1 million and $33.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively. Additionally, the Company capitalized $1.7 million of interest related to construction in progress for the year ended December 31, 2019. No interest was capitalized during the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020. As of December 31, 2021 and 2020, $4.0 million and $4.0 million of interest expense were payable, respectively.
The following is a schedule of maturities, including principal amortization payments, for all notes payable outstanding as of December 31, 2021 (in thousands):
2022 $ 1,013
2023 1,100,067
2024 371,210
2025 -
2026 -
Thereafter -
$ 1,472,290
The Company’s notes payable contain financial debt covenants. As of December 31, 2021, the Company was in compliance with these debt covenants.
Recent Financing Transactions
Unsecured Credit Facility
On July 30, 2021, the Company, through REIT Properties III, an indirect wholly owned subsidiary, entered into a two-year unsecured credit facility with two unaffiliated lenders for a committed amount of up to $75.0 million (the “Unsecured Credit Facility”), of which $37.5 million is term debt and $37.5 million is revolving debt. Subject to certain conditions contained in the loan documents, the Company may on three occasions request an increase of the aggregate committed amount, provided that the aggregate commitment under the Unsecured Credit Facility may not exceed $100.0 million and that the election to fund any such additional amounts shall be in the sole discretion of the lenders. At closing, $37.5 million of term debt was funded. As of December 31, 2021, the outstanding balance under the Unsecured Credit Facility consisted of $37.5 million of term debt and an additional $37.5 million of revolving debt remained available for future disbursements, subject to certain terms and conditions contained in the loan documents.
The Unsecured Credit Facility matures on July 30, 2023, with one 12-month extension option, subject to certain terms and conditions contained in the loan documents. The Unsecured Credit Facility bears interest at a floating rate of 210 basis points over one-month LIBOR. The Unsecured Credit Facility includes provisions for a “LIBOR Successor Rate” in the event LIBOR is unascertainable or ceases to be available. Monthly payments are interest only with the entire balance and all outstanding interest and fees due at maturity. The Company has the right to prepay the loan, without penalty or premium (other than any break funding or swap breakage fees), in part and in whole subject to certain conditions contained in the loan documents.
KBS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST III, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
December 31, 2021
7. NOTES PAYABLE (CONTINUED)
In addition, the Unsecured Credit Facility contains customary representations and warranties, financial and other affirmative and negative covenants, events of default and remedies typical for this type of facility, including without limitation: a maximum leverage ratio, a maximum secured recourse indebtedness ratio, a limitation on other unsecured indebtedness, a minimum consolidated net worth requirement, a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio, a minimum liquidity requirement, and a cross default to the borrower’s other material indebtedness and to the borrower’s other agreements with the administrative agent and the lenders (excluding swaps, unless a swap termination fee has not been paid when due). If an event of default exists under the Unsecured Credit Facility, the Company’s ability to pay dividends would be limited to the amount necessary to maintain the Company’s status as a REIT.
Amended and Restated Portfolio Loan Facility
On November 3, 2021, the Company, through indirect wholly owned subsidiaries (each a “Borrower” and together, the “Borrowers”), entered into a two-year loan agreement with Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent; BofA Securities, Inc., Wells Fargo Securities, LLC and Capital One, National Association as joint lead arrangers and joint book runners; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as syndication agent, and each of the financial institutions a signatory thereto (the “Amended and Restated Portfolio Loan Facility Lenders”), for an amount up to $613.2 million, of which $459.9 million is term debt and $153.3 million is revolving debt (the “Amended and Restated Portfolio Loan Facility”). At closing, $459.9 million of term debt and $57.1 million of revolving debt were funded, which was used to pay off in full the Company’s Modified Portfolio Loan Facility, and an additional $96.2 million of the revolving debt remained available for future disbursements, subject to certain terms and conditions contained in the loan documents. Subject to certain terms and conditions contained in the loan documents, the Amended and Restated Portfolio Loan Facility may be used for (i) paying closing costs and other expenses related to the loan, (ii) for the return of equity to certain indirect owners of Borrowers, (iii) to pay or reimburse Borrowers for certain other costs and expenses, including tenant improvement costs, leasing commissions, and capital improvement costs at the properties securing the loan, (iv) working capital or liquidity management of the Company, and (v) for any other lawful purpose, provided that $25.0 million of the revolving debt is to be used for tenant improvements, tenant allowances or any other work required pursuant to the terms of a specified lease described in the loan documents, although this restriction is released as the Company completes such projects. In addition, the Amended and Restated Portfolio Loan Facility contains customary representations and warranties, financial and other affirmative and negative covenants (including maintenance of an ongoing debt service coverage ratio), events of default and remedies typical for this type of facility. As of December 31, 2021, the outstanding balance under the Amended and Restated Portfolio Loan Facility consisted of $459.9 million of term debt, and an additional $153.3 million of revolving debt remained available for future disbursements, subject to certain terms and conditions contained in the loan documents.
The Amended and Restated Portfolio Loan Facility matures on November 3, 2023, with one additional 12-month extension option, subject to certain terms and conditions as described in the loan documents. The Amended and Restated Portfolio Loan Facility bears interest at the Bloomberg Short-Term Bank Yield Index (“BSBY”) rate plus 180 basis points per annum. Monthly payments are interest only with the entire balance and all outstanding interest and fees due at maturity. The Company will have the right to prepay the loan in part and in whole, without fee, premium or penalty, subject to certain conditions contained in the loan documents.
The Amended and Restated Portfolio Loan Facility is secured by RBC Plaza, Preston Commons, Sterling Plaza, Towers at Emeryville, Ten Almaden and Town Center. The Company has the right to substitute properties securing the Amended and Restated Portfolio Loan Facility at any time, subject to approval of the Amended and Restated Portfolio Loan Facility Lenders and compliance with the terms and conditions described in the loan agreement.
KBS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST III, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
December 31, 2021
8. DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS
The Company enters into derivative instruments for risk management purposes to hedge its exposure to cash flow variability caused by changing interest rates. The primary goal of the Company’s risk management practices related to interest rate risk is to prevent changes in interest rates from adversely impacting the Company’s ability to achieve its investment return objectives. The Company does not enter into derivatives for speculative purposes.
The Company enters into interest rate swaps as a fixed rate payer to mitigate its exposure to rising interest rates on its variable rate notes payable. The value of interest rate swaps is primarily impacted by interest rates, market expectations about interest rates, and the remaining life of the instrument. In general, increases in interest rates, or anticipated increases in interest rates, will increase the value of the fixed rate payer position and decrease the value of the variable rate payer position. As the remaining life of the interest rate swap decreases, the value of both positions will generally move towards zero.
As of December 31, 2021, the Company has entered into 12 interest rate swaps, which were not designated as hedging instruments. The following table summarizes the notional amount and other information related to the Company’s interest rate swaps as of December 31, 2021 and 2020. The notional amount is an indication of the extent of the Company’s involvement in each instrument at that time, but does not represent exposure to credit, interest rate or market risks (dollars in thousands):
December 31, 2021 December 31, 2020 Weighted-Average
Fix Pay Rate Weighted-Average Remaining Term in Years
Derivative Instruments Number of Instruments Notional Amount Number of Instruments Notional Amount Reference Rate as of December 31, 2021
Derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments
Interest rate swaps (1)
12 $ 1,420,390 8 $ 1,121,590 One-month LIBOR/
Fixed at 0.70% - 2.11%
1.6% 1.4
_____________________
(1) Includes four forward interest rate swaps in the total amount of $300.0 million, which will become effective on November 1, 2022 and mature on January 1, 2025.
The following table sets forth the fair value of the Company’s derivative instruments as well as their classification on the consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2021 and 2020 (dollars in thousands):
December 31, 2021 December 31, 2020
Derivative Instruments Balance Sheet Location Number of
Instruments Fair Value Number of
Instruments Fair Value
Derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments
Interest rate swaps Prepaid expenses and other assets, at fair value (1)
5 $ 757 - $ -
Interest rate swaps Other liabilities, at fair value (2)
7 $ (12,805) 8 $ (35,331)
_____________________
(1) Includes four forward interest rate swaps which will become effective on November 1, 2022 and mature on January 1, 2025. As of December 31, 2021, prepaid expenses and other assets included a $0.1 million asset related to the fair value of an off-market interest rate swap determined to be a hybrid financial instrument for which the Company elected to apply the fair value option.
(2) As of December 31, 2021, other liabilities included a $2.1 million liability related to the fair value of an off-market interest rate swap determined to be a hybrid financial instrument for which the Company elected to apply the fair value option, and as of December 31, 2020, other liabilities included a $7.8 million liability related to the fair value of two off-market interest rate swaps determined to be hybrid financial instruments for which the Company elected to apply the fair value option.
KBS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST III, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
December 31, 2021
8. DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS (CONTINUED)
The following table summarizes the effects of derivative instruments on the Company’s consolidated statements of operations (in thousands):
For the Years Ended December 31,
2021 2020 2019
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments
Realized loss (gain) recognized on interest rate swaps $ 18,020 $ 13,947 $ (2,561)
Unrealized (gain) loss on interest rate swaps (1)
(23,283) 25,165 35,664
(Decrease) increase in interest expense as a result of derivatives $ (5,263) $ 39,112 $ 33,103
_____________________
(1) For the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, unrealized (gain) loss on interest rate swaps included a $5.8 million unrealized gain and a $7.8 million unrealized loss, respectively, related to the change in fair value of two off-market interest rate swaps determined to be hybrid financial instruments for which the Company elected to apply the fair value option.
9. FAIR VALUE DISCLOSURES
The following is a summary of the methods and assumptions used by management in estimating the fair value of each class of assets and liabilities for which it is practicable to estimate the fair value:
Cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, rent and other receivables, and accounts payable and accrued liabilities: These balances approximate their fair values due to the short maturities of these items.
Real estate equity securities: At December 31, 2021, the Company’s investment in the units of the SREIT was presented at fair value on the accompanying consolidated balance sheet. The fair value of the units of the SREIT was based on a quoted price in an active market on a major stock exchange. The Company classifies these inputs as Level 1 inputs.
Derivative instruments: The Company’s derivative instruments are presented at fair value on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. The valuation of these instruments is determined using a proprietary model that utilizes observable inputs. As such, the Company classifies these inputs as Level 2 inputs. The proprietary model uses the contractual terms of the derivatives, including the period to maturity, as well as observable market-based inputs, including interest rate curves and volatility. The fair values of interest rate swaps are estimated using the market standard methodology of netting the discounted fixed cash payments and the discounted expected variable cash receipts. The variable cash receipts are based on an expectation of interest rates (forward curves) derived from observable market interest rate curves. In addition, credit valuation adjustments, which consider the impact of any credit risks to the contracts, are incorporated in the fair values to account for potential nonperformance risk.
Notes payable: The fair values of the Company’s notes payable are estimated using a discounted cash flow analysis based on management’s estimates of current market interest rates for instruments with similar characteristics, including remaining loan term, loan-to-value ratio, type of collateral and other credit enhancements. Additionally, when determining the fair value of a liability in circumstances in which a quoted price in an active market for an identical liability is not available, the Company measures fair value using (i) a valuation technique that uses the quoted price of the identical liability when traded as an asset or quoted prices for similar liabilities when traded as assets or (ii) another valuation technique that is consistent with the principles of fair value measurement, such as the income approach or the market approach. The Company classifies these inputs as Level 3 inputs.
KBS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST III, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
December 31, 2021
9. FAIR VALUE DISCLOSURES (CONTINUED)
The following were the face values, carrying amounts and fair values of the Company’s notes payable as of December 31, 2021 and 2020, which carrying amounts generally do not approximate the fair values (in thousands):
December 31, 2021 December 31, 2020
Face Value Carrying
Amount Fair Value Face Value Carrying
Amount Fair Value
Financial liabilities:
Notes payable $ 1,472,290 $ 1,465,398 $ 1,469,580 $ 1,396,745 $ 1,388,365 $ 1,380,143
Disclosure of the fair values of financial instruments is based on pertinent information available to the Company as of the period end and requires a significant amount of judgment. Low levels of transaction volume for certain financial instruments have made the estimation of fair values difficult and, therefore, both the actual results and the Company’s estimate of value at a future date could be materially different.
As of December 31, 2021, the Company measured the following assets and liabilities at fair value (in thousands):
Fair Value Measurements Using
Total Quoted Prices in
Active Markets
for Identical Assets
(Level 1) Significant Other
Observable Inputs
(Level 2) Significant
Unobservable Inputs
(Level 3)
Recurring Basis:
Real estate equity securities $ 180,228 $ 180,228 $ - $ -
Asset derivatives - interest rate swaps (1)
757 - 757 -
Liability derivatives - interest rate swaps (2)
(12,805) - (12,805) -
_____________________
(1) Includes four forward interest rate swaps which will become effective on November 1, 2022 and mature on January 1, 2025. Also includes a $0.1 million asset related to the fair value of an off-market interest rate swap determined to be a hybrid financial instrument for which the Company elected to apply the fair value option.
(2) Includes a $2.1 million liability related to the fair value of an off-market interest rate swap determined to be a hybrid financial instrument for which the Company elected to apply the fair value option.
10. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
The Company has entered into the Advisory Agreement with the Advisor and the Dealer Manager Agreement with the Dealer Manager. These agreements entitled the Advisor and/or the Dealer Manager to specified fees upon the provision of certain services with regard to the Offering and reimbursement of organization and offering costs incurred by the Advisor and the Dealer Manager on behalf of the Company and entitle the Advisor to specified fees upon the provision of certain services with regard to the investment of funds in real estate investments, the management of those investments, among other services, and the disposition of investments, as well as entitle the Advisor and/or the Dealer Manager to reimbursement of offering costs related to the dividend reinvestment plan incurred by the Advisor and the Dealer Manager on behalf of the Company and certain costs incurred by the Advisor in providing services to the Company. In addition, the Advisor is entitled to certain other fees, including an incentive fee upon achieving certain performance goals, as detailed in the Advisory Agreement. The Company has also entered into a fee reimbursement agreement with the Dealer Manager pursuant to which the Company agreed to reimburse the Dealer Manager for certain fees and expenses it incurs for administering the Company’s participation in the DTCC Alternative Investment Product Platform with respect to certain accounts of the Company’s investors serviced through the platform. The Advisor and Dealer Manager also serve or served as the advisor and dealer manager, respectively, for KBS REIT II and KBS Growth & Income REIT.
KBS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST III, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
December 31, 2021
10. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS (CONTINUED)
As of January 1, 2019, the Company, together with KBS REIT II, KBS Growth & Income REIT, the Dealer Manager, the Advisor and other KBS-affiliated entities, had entered into an errors and omissions and directors and officers liability insurance program where the lower tiers of such insurance coverage were shared. The cost of these lower tiers is allocated by the Advisor and its insurance broker among each of the various entities covered by the program, and is billed directly to each entity. In June 2021, the Company renewed its participation in the program. The program is effective through June 30, 2022.
Pursuant to the terms of these agreements, summarized below are the related-party costs incurred by the Company for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019, respectively, and any related amounts payable as of December 31, 2021 and 2020 (in thousands):
Incurred Years Ended
December 31, Receivable as of
December 31, Payable as of
December 31,
2021 2020 2019 2021 2020 2021 2020
Expensed
Asset management fees (1)
$ 19,832 $ 20,990 $ 24,614 $ - $ - $ 8,065 $ 8,529
Reimbursement of operating expenses (2) (3)
577 479 1,453 343 - 61 97
Disposition fees (4)
2,426 1,715 9,483 - - - -
Capitalized
Acquisition fee on development project - 34 217 - - - -
$ 22,835 $ 23,218 $ 35,767 $ 343 $ - $ 8,126 $ 8,626
_____________________
(1) See “Deferral of Asset Management Fees” below.
(2) Reimbursable operating expenses primarily consists of internal audit personnel costs, accounting software costs and cybersecurity related expenses incurred by the Advisor under the Advisory Agreement. The Company has reimbursed the Advisor for the Company’s allocable portion of the salaries, benefits and overhead of internal audit department personnel providing services to the Company. These amounts totaled $428,000, $338,000 and $357,000 for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019, respectively, and were the only type of employee costs reimbursed under the Advisory Agreement for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019. The Company currently does not reimburse for employee costs in connection with services for which the Advisor earns acquisition or origination fees or disposition fees (other than reimbursement of travel and communication expenses) or for the salaries or benefits the Advisor or its affiliates may pay to the Company’s executive officers. In addition to the amounts above, the Company reimburses the Advisor for certain of the Company’s direct costs incurred from third parties that were initially paid by the Advisor on behalf of the Company. The receivable as of December 31, 2021 relates to estimated amounts charged to the Company by certain vendors for services for which the Company believes it was either overcharged or which were never performed. The Advisor has agreed to reimburse the Company for any amounts inappropriately charged to the Company. The reimbursement of these overpayments will be partially credited against asset management fees that were deferred in prior periods of $0.5 million that would have been due by the Company to the Advisor in those periods as a result of the increase in the Company’s net income and MFFO for such periods, and corresponding decrease in expenses, related to the charges that the Company should not have incurred. The remainder of the reimbursement, $0.3 million, will be reimbursed to the Company in cash by the Advisor. The Company’s audit committee, in conjunction with the audit committee of KBS REIT II, is conducting an ongoing investigation of this matter.
(3) Prior to the Singapore Transaction closing on July 19, 2019, the Company and the Advisor had agreed to evenly divide certain costs and expenses related to the Singapore Transaction. The Company incurred a total of $4.1 million of costs related to the Singapore Transaction, which were reimbursable by the SREIT upon a successful closing. These costs included legal, audit, tax, printing and other out-of-pocket costs that the Company incurred related to the Singapore Transaction. In October 2019, all of these costs had been reimbursed to the Company from the Advisor upon the Advisor receiving the reimbursement from the SREIT.
(4) Disposition fees with respect to real estate sold are included in the gain on sale of real estate, net, in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
In connection with the Offering, Messrs. Bren, Hall, McMillan and Schreiber agreed to provide additional indemnification to one of the participating broker-dealers. The Company agreed to add supplemental coverage to its directors’ and officers’ insurance coverage to insure Messrs. Bren, Hall, McMillan and Schreiber’s obligations under this indemnification agreement in exchange for reimbursement by Messrs. Bren, Hall, McMillan and Schreiber to the Company for all costs, expenses and premiums related to this supplemental coverage. During each of the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019, the Advisor incurred $0.1 million for the costs of the supplemental coverage obtained by the Company.
KBS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST III, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
December 31, 2021
10. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS (CONTINUED)
Deferral of Asset Management Fees
Pursuant to the Advisory Agreement, with respect to asset management fees accruing from March 1, 2014, the Advisor has agreed to defer, without interest, the Company’s obligation to pay asset management fees for any month in which the Company’s modified funds from operations (“MFFO”) for such month, as such term is defined in the practice guideline issued by the Institute for Portfolio Alternatives in November 2010 and interpreted by the Company, excluding asset management fees, does not exceed the amount of distributions declared by the Company for record dates of that month. The Company remains obligated to pay the Advisor an asset management fee in any month in which the Company’s MFFO, excluding asset management fees, for such month exceeds the amount of distributions declared for the record dates of that month (such excess amount, an “MFFO Surplus”); however, any amount of such asset management fee in excess of the MFFO Surplus will also be deferred under the Advisory Agreement. If the MFFO Surplus for any month exceeds the amount of the asset management fee payable for such month, any remaining MFFO Surplus will be applied to pay any asset management fee amounts previously deferred in accordance with the Advisory Agreement.
However, notwithstanding the foregoing, any and all deferred asset management fees that are unpaid will become immediately due and payable at such time as the Company’s stockholders have received, together as a collective group, aggregate distributions (including distributions that may constitute a return of capital for federal income tax purposes) sufficient to provide (i) an 8.0% per year cumulative, noncompounded return on such net invested capital (the “Stockholders’ 8% Return”) and (ii) a return of their net invested capital, or the amount calculated by multiplying the total number of shares purchased by stockholders by the issue price, reduced by any amounts to repurchase shares pursuant to the Company’s share redemption program. The Stockholders’ 8% Return is not based on the return provided to any individual stockholder. Accordingly, it is not necessary for each of the Company’s stockholders to have received any minimum return in order for the Advisor to receive deferred asset management fees.
As of December 31, 2021 and 2020, the Company had accrued $8.1 million and $8.5 million of asset management fees, respectively, of which $6.4 million and $7.2 million were deferred as of December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively, pursuant to the provision for deferral of asset management fees under the Advisory Agreement as described above.
Lease to Affiliate
On May 29, 2015, the indirect wholly owned subsidiary (the “Lessor”) of the Company that owns 3003 Washington Boulevard entered into a lease with an affiliate of the Advisor (the “Lessee”) for 5,046 rentable square feet, or approximately 2.4% of the total rentable square feet, at 3003 Washington Boulevard. The lease commenced on October 1, 2015 and was to terminate on August 31, 2019. The annualized base rent, which represents annualized contractual base rental income, adjusted to straight-line any contractual tenant concessions (including free rent) and rent increases from the lease’s inception through the balance of the initial lease term, for this lease was approximately $0.2 million, and the average annual rental rate (net of rental abatements) over the lease term was $46.38 per square foot.
On March 14, 2019, the Lessor entered into a First Amendment to Deed of Lease with the Lessee to extend the lease period commencing on September 1, 2019 and terminating on August 31, 2024 (the “Amended Lease”) and set the annual base rent during the extension period. The annualized base rent from the commencement of the Amended Lease is approximately $0.3 million, and the average annual rental rate (net of rental abatements) over the term of the Amended Lease through its termination is $62.55 per square foot.
During the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019, the Company recognized $0.3 million, $0.3 million and $0.3 million of revenue related to this lease, respectively.
Prior to their approval of the lease and the Amended Lease, the Company’s conflicts committee and board of directors determined the lease to be fair and reasonable to the Company.
KBS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST III, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
December 31, 2021
10. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS (CONTINUED)
Portfolio Sale
On July 18, 2019, the Company sold the Singapore Portfolio to the SREIT, which is affiliated with Charles J. Schreiber, Jr., a director and executive officer of the Company. See Note 6, “Real Estate Equity Securities” for information related to the Company’s investment in the SREIT. The SREIT is externally managed by an entity (the “Manager”) in which Charles J. Schreiber, Jr. currently holds an indirect ownership interest. Mr. Schreiber is also a former director of the Manager. The SREIT pays the Manager an annual base fee of 10% of annual distributable income and an annual performance fee of 25% of the increase in distributions per unit of the SREIT from the preceding year. For acquisitions other than the Singapore Portfolio, the SREIT pays the Manager an acquisition fee of 1% of the acquisition price. The SREIT will also pay the Manager a divestment fee of 0.5% of the sale price of any real estate sold and a development management fee of 3% of the total project costs incurred for development projects. A portion of the fees paid to the Manager are paid to KBS Realty Advisors LLC, an entity controlled by Mr. Schreiber, for sub-advisory services. The Schreiber Trust, a trust whose beneficiaries are Charles J. Schreiber, Jr. and his family members, and the Linda Bren 2017 Trust also acquired units in the SREIT. The Schreiber Trust agreed it will not sell any portion of its units in the SREIT unless it has received the consent of the Company’s conflicts committee. The Linda Bren 2017 Trust has agreed it will not sell $5.0 million of its investment in the SREIT unless it has received the consent of the Company’s conflicts committee.
During the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019, no other business transactions occurred between the Company and KBS REIT II, KBS Growth & Income REIT, the Advisor, the Dealer Manager or other KBS-affiliated entities. See Note 11 “Commitments and Contingencies - Participation Fee Liability”.
11. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Economic Dependency
The Company is dependent on the Advisor for certain services that are essential to the Company, including the identification, evaluation, negotiation, origination, acquisition and disposition of investments; management of the daily operations of the Company’s investment portfolio; and other general and administrative responsibilities. In the event that the Advisor is unable to provide the respective services, the Company will be required to obtain such services from other sources.
Legal Matters
From time to time, the Company may be party to legal proceedings that arise in the ordinary course of its business. Management is not aware of any legal proceedings of which the outcome is probable or reasonably possible to have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations or financial condition, which would require accrual or disclosure of the contingency and possible range of loss. Additionally, the Company has not recorded any loss contingencies related to legal proceedings in which the potential loss is deemed to be remote.
Environmental
As an owner of real estate, the Company is subject to various environmental laws of federal, state and local governments. Compliance with existing environmental laws is not expected to have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition and results of operations as of December 31, 2021.
KBS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST III, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
December 31, 2021
11. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (CONTINUED)
Participation Fee Liability
In accordance with the Advisory Agreement with the Advisor, the Advisor is entitled to receive a participation fee equal to 15.0% of the Company’s net cash flows, whether from continuing operations, net sale proceeds or otherwise, after the Company’s stockholders have received, together as a collective group, aggregate distributions (including distributions that may constitute a return of capital for federal income tax purposes) sufficient to provide (i) a return of their net invested capital, or the amount calculated by multiplying the total number of shares purchased by stockholders by the issue price, reduced by any amounts to repurchase shares pursuant to the share redemption program, and (ii) an 8.0% per year cumulative, noncompounded return on such net invested capital. Net sales proceeds means the net cash proceeds realized by the Company after deduction of all expenses incurred in connection with a sale, including disposition fees paid to the Advisor. The 8.0% per year cumulative, noncompounded return on net invested capital is calculated on a daily basis. In making this calculation, the net invested capital is reduced to the extent distributions in excess of a cumulative, noncompounded, annual return of 8.0% are paid (from whatever source), except to the extent such distributions would be required to supplement prior distributions paid in order to achieve a cumulative, noncompounded, annual return of 8.0% (invested capital is only reduced as described in this sentence; it is not reduced simply because a distribution constitutes a return of capital for federal income tax purposes). The 8.0% per year cumulative, noncompounded return is not based on the return provided to any individual stockholder. Accordingly, it is not necessary for each of the Company’s stockholders to have received any minimum return in order for the Advisor to participate in the Company’s net cash flows. In fact, if the Advisor is entitled to participate in the Company’s net cash flows, the returns of the Company’s stockholders will differ, and some may be less than an 8.0% per year cumulative, noncompounded return. This fee is payable only if the Company is not listed on an exchange.
On January 9, 2020, the Company filed a definitive proxy statement with the SEC seeking approval from its stockholders of, among other proposals, two proposals related to the Company’s pursuit of conversion to a non-listed, perpetual-life “NAV REIT.” On May 7, 2020 at the Company’s annual meeting of stockholders, the Company’s stockholders approved the proposal to accelerate the payment of incentive compensation to the Advisor, upon the Company’s conversion to an NAV REIT. With respect to the incentive fee structure currently in effect with the Advisor, the triggering events for payment of the incentive fee are generally expected to occur, if ever, upon a listing of the Company’s shares of stock on a national securities exchange or a significant distribution of cash in connection with a sale of all or a substantial amount of the Company’s assets. These triggering events are inconsistent with a perpetual-life NAV REIT that intends to provide liquidity to its stockholders through a share redemption program and/or periodic self-tender offers. If the Company converts to an NAV REIT, in order to properly align the Advisor’s and its affiliates’ incentive fee compensation structure with the Company’s proposed perpetual-life strategy, the Company intends to revise its incentive fee structure. With respect to the historical performance period from inception through conversion to an NAV REIT, the Company sought and obtained stockholder approval to accelerate the payment of the incentive compensation upon conversion to a perpetual-life NAV REIT, subject to certain conditions. If the Company converts to an NAV REIT, such accelerated payment is subject to further approval of the conflicts committee of the Company’s board of directors, after the proposed amount of the accelerated payment of the incentive fee has been determined. In connection with the determination of the November 1, 2021 estimated value per share of the Company’s common stock, the Advisor determined that there would be no liability related to the subordinated participation in net cash flows at that time, based on a hypothetical liquidation of the assets and liabilities at their estimated fair values, after considering the impact of any potential closing costs and fees related to the disposition of real estate properties; however, changes to the fair values of assets and liabilities could have a material impact to the incentive fee calculation.
The Company’s conflicts committee and board of directors continue to evaluate various alternatives available to the Company, including whether or not to convert to an NAV REIT. Based on their assessment of alternatives available to the Company, market conditions and their further assessment of the Company’s capital raising prospects, the Company’s conflicts committee and board of directors may conclude that it would be in the best interest of the Company’s stockholders to (i) convert to an NAV REIT, (ii) continue to operate as a going concern under the Company’s current business plan, or (iii) adopt a plan of liquidation that would involve the sale of the Company’s remaining assets (in which event such plan would be presented to stockholders for approval). The Company can provide no assurances as to whether or when any alternative being considered by the Company’s board of directors will be consummated.
KBS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST III, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
December 31, 2021
12. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
The Company evaluates subsequent events up until the date the consolidated financial statements are issued.
Distributions Paid
On January 4, 2022, the Company paid distributions of $7.7 million, which related to distributions in the amount of $0.04983333 per share of common stock to stockholders of record as of the close of business on December 20, 2021. On February 1, 2022, the Company paid distributions of $7.6 million, which related to distributions in the amount of $0.04983333 per share of common stock to stockholders of record as of the close of business on January 24, 2022. On March 4, 2022, the Company paid distributions of $7.6 million, which related to distributions in the amount of $0.04983333 per share of common stock to stockholders of record as of the close of business on February 22, 2022.
Amended and Restated Share Redemption Program
On March 17, 2022, the Company’s board of directors approved the March 2022 Share Redemption Program. The March 2022 Share Redemption Program decreases the reserve for Special Redemptions for calendar year 2022 from $10.0 million to $2.0 million. As such, during calendar year 2022, the March 2022 Share Redemption Program limits the number of shares the Company may redeem to those that the Company could purchase with the amount of net proceeds from the sale of shares under the Company’s dividend reinvestment plan during the prior calendar year, provided that once the Company has received requests for redemptions, whether in connection with Special Redemptions or otherwise, that if honored, and when combined with all prior redemptions made during the calendar year, would result in the amount of remaining funds available for the redemption of additional shares in such calendar year being $2.0 million or less, the last $2.0 million of available funds shall be reserved exclusively for redemptions sought in connection with Special Redemptions.
There were no other material changes to the Company’s share redemption program.
The Company may (a) amend, suspend or terminate the March 2022 Share Redemption Program for any reason, or (b) consistent with SEC guidance and interpretations, increase or decrease the funding available for the redemption of shares pursuant to the March 2022 Share Redemption Program, each upon ten business days’ notice to the Company’s stockholders. The Company may provide notice by including such information in a (i) Current Report on Form 8-K or in its annual or quarterly reports, all publicly filed with the SEC or (ii) separate mailing to the stockholders.
The March 2022 Share Redemption Program is effective for the March 31, 2022 redemption date.
Distributions Authorized
On March 28, 2022, the Company’s board of directors authorized a March 2022 distribution in the amount of $0.04983333 per share of common stock to stockholders of record as of the close of business on March 28, 2022, which the Company expects to pay in April 2022, and an April 2022 distribution in the amount of $0.04983333 per share of common stock to stockholders of record as of the close of business on April 20, 2022, which the Company expects to pay in May 2022.
Investors may choose to receive cash distributions or purchase additional shares through the Company’s dividend reinvestment plan.
KBS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST III, INC.
SCHEDULE III
REAL ESTATE ASSETS AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION AND AMORTIZATION
December 31, 2021
(dollar amounts in thousands)
Initial Cost to Company Gross Amount at which
Carried at Close of Period
Description Location Ownership
Percent Encumbrances Land Building and
Improvements (1)
Total Cost
Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition(2)
Land Building and
Improvements (1)
Total (3)
Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization Original Date of
Construction Date
Acquired
Town Center
Plano, TX 100% (4)
$ 7,428 $ 108,547 $ 115,975 $ 17,202 $ 7,428 $ 125,749 $ 133,177 $ (43,348) 2001/2002/2006 03/27/2012
McEwen Building
Franklin, TN 100% (5)
5,600 34,704 40,304 (2,555) 5,600 32,149 37,749 (9,364) 2009 04/30/2012
Gateway Tech Center Salt Lake City, UT 100% (5)
5,617 20,051 25,668 5,919 5,617 25,970 31,587 (8,726) 1909 05/09/2012
RBC Plaza Minneapolis, MN 100% (4)
16,951 109,191 126,142 18,717 16,951 127,908 144,859 (47,996) 1991 01/31/2013
Preston Commons Dallas, TX 100% (4)
17,188 96,330 113,518 25,225 17,188 121,555 138,743 (32,179) 1958/1986 06/19/2013
Sterling Plaza Dallas, TX 100% (4)
6,800 68,292 75,092 12,703 6,800 80,995 87,795 (23,791) 1984 06/19/2013
201 Spear Street San Francisco, CA 100% $ 125,000 40,279 85,941 126,220 25,089 40,279 111,030 151,309 (31,187) 1984 12/03/2013
Accenture Tower Chicago, IL 100% 281,250 49,306 370,662 419,968 69,285 49,306 439,947 489,253 (119,402) 1987 12/16/2013
Ten Almaden San Jose, CA 100% (4)
7,000 110,292 117,292 13,296 7,000 123,588 130,588 (32,197) 1988 12/05/2014
Towers at Emeryville Emeryville, CA 100% (4)
35,774 147,167 182,941 31,308 35,774 178,475 214,249 (47,793) 1972/1975/1985 12/23/2014
3003 Washington Boulevard Arlington, VA 100% (6)
18,800 129,820 148,620 3,619 18,800 133,439 152,239 (36,070) 2014 12/30/2014
Park Place Village Leawood, KS 100% - 11,009 117,070 128,079 (47,093) 8,101 72,885 80,986 (6,214) 2007 06/18/2015
201 17th Street Atlanta, GA 100% (5)
5,277 86,859 92,136 11,706 5,277 98,565 103,842 (28,200) 2007 06/23/2015
515 Congress Austin, TX 100% (5)
8,000 106,261 114,261 15,924 8,000 122,185 130,185 (25,197) 1975 08/31/2015
The Almaden San Jose, CA 100% 123,000 29,000 130,145 159,145 30,162 29,000 160,307 189,307 (36,883) 1980/1981 09/23/2015
3001 Washington Boulevard Arlington, VA 100% (6)
9,900 41,551 51,451 9,416 9,900 50,967 60,867 (10,870) 2015 11/06/2015
Carillon Charlotte, NC 100% 105,800 19,100 126,979 146,079 18,452 19,100 145,431 164,531 (33,551) 1991 01/15/2016
TOTAL
$ 293,029 $ 1,889,862 $ 2,182,891 $ 258,375 $ 290,121 $ 2,151,145 $ 2,441,266 $ (572,968)
____________________
(1) Building and improvements includes tenant origination and absorption costs and construction in progress.
(2) Costs capitalized subsequent to acquisition is net of impairment charges, write-offs of fully depreciated/amortized assets and property damage.
(3) The aggregate cost of real estate for federal income tax purposes was $2.7 billion (unaudited) as of December 31, 2021.
(4) As of December 31, 2021, these properties served as the security for the Amended and Restated Portfolio Loan Facility, which had an outstanding principal balance of $459.9 million.
(5) As of December 31, 2021, these properties served as the security for the Modified Portfolio Revolving Loan Facility, which had an outstanding principal balance of $196.6 million.
(6) As of December 31, 2021, these properties served as the security for the 3001 & 3003 Washington Mortgage Loan, which had an outstanding principal balance of $143.2 million.
KBS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST III, INC.
SCHEDULE III
REAL ESTATE ASSETS AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION AND AMORTIZATION (CONTINUED)
December 31, 2021
(dollar amounts in thousands)
2021 2020 2019
Real Estate:
Balance at the beginning of the year $ 2,554,572 $ 2,625,002 $ 3,573,511
Improvements 69,527 96,191 102,921
Construction in progress - - 19,035
Write off of fully depreciated and fully amortized assets (15,502) (18,832) (50,590)
Impairments - (19,395) (8,490)
Sale (167,331) (128,394) (1,011,385)
Balance at the end of the year $ 2,441,266 $ 2,554,572 $ 2,625,002
Accumulated depreciation and amortization:
Balance at the beginning of the year $ (525,629) $ (449,381) $ (536,990)
Depreciation and amortization expense (100,036) (100,162) (136,040)
Write off of fully depreciated and fully amortized assets 15,502 18,832 50,590
Sale 37,195 5,082 173,059
Balance at the end of the year $ (572,968) $ (525,629) $ (449,381)