EDGAR 10-K Filing

Company CIK: 879911
Filing Year: 2025
Filename: 879911_10-K_2025_0001013762-25-003924.json

---

ITEM 1. BUSINESS
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
Cautionary Note Concerning Forward-Looking Statements
Certain statements in this Form 10-K constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Forward-looking statements include all statements that do not relate solely to historical or current facts and can be identified by the use of forward-looking words such as “may,” “believe,” “will,” “expect,” “project,” “anticipate,” “estimates,” “plans,” “strategy,” “target,” “prospects” or “continue,” and words of similar meaning. These forward-looking statements are based on the current plans and expectations of our management and are subject to a number of uncertainties and risks that could significantly affect our current plans and expectations, as well as future results of operations and financial condition and may cause our actual results, performances or achievements to be materially different from any future results, performances or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. This Form 10-K contains important information as to risk factors under Item 1A. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are reasonable, such expectations may prove incorrect over time. We do not assume any obligation to update these forward-looking statements to reflect actual results, changes in assumptions, or changes in other factors affecting such forward-looking statements.
Available Information
Applied Energetics, Inc. (“company,” “Applied Energetics,” “AE,” “we,” “our” or “us”) makes available free of charge on its website at www.appliedenergetics.com its Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as soon as reasonably practical after electronically filing or furnishing such material to the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”).
This report may be read or copied at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, NE, Room 1580, Washington, DC 20549 or at www.sec.gov. Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330.
General
Applied Energetics, Inc. is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware. Our headquarters are located at 9070 S. Rita Road, Suite 1500, Tucson, Arizona, 85747 and our telephone number is (520) 628-7415. Our website is located at www.appliedenergetics.com.
Applied Energetics, Inc. specializes in advanced laser and photonics systems, particularly fiber-based ultrashort pulse (USP) laser technologies. With 26 patents and 8 patents pending, Applied Energetics’ proprietary architecture enables orders of magnitude size-weight-power reductions, a key differentiator when compared with traditional continuous wave (CW) laser technology with larger footprints. AE’s powerful, dual-use systems are designed for integration and deployment on numerous potential defense platforms for the delivery of high intensity, ultrashort pulses of light to disable or destroy a target or disrupt a mission. These technologies have applications in both national security and commercial markets. Today, AE's USP optical technologies are being designed to offer flexibility and power for complex missions in national security such as enhancing layered defense strategies to counter complex threats.
Technology, Capabilities, and Patents
Applied Energetics, Inc. is recognized as a global leader in developing the next generation optical sources exhibiting ever-increasing output energy, peak power and frequency agility while also providing decreased size, weight, and cost of these systems for customers. Applied Energetics utilizes patented, dual-use technologies to advance critical industries. Leveraging our proprietary fiber-based architecture and wavelength- and pulse-agility capability, our Ultrashort Pulse (USP) technology can enable users to achieve specific effects across different use cases with an unmatched blend of size, weight, and power attributes. While initially designed to meet the emerging needs and priorities for the national security community, our directed energy technology also has commercial applications in both the biomedical and advanced manufacturing industries.
Our UltraShort Pulse Lasers (USP) are designed to provide:
● Frequency Agile Optical Sources from Ultraviolet (UV) to Far Infrared (IR)
● Pulse Duration Agility
● Size, Weight, and Power Optimization
● Advanced Fiber Applications
● Laser Guided Energy (LGE®)
● Laser Induced Plasma Channel (LIPC®)
Applied Energetics’ directed energy technologies are vastly different from conventional directed energy systems, i.e. Applied Energetics’ proprietary fiber-based architecture is a key differentiator for our most recent technology demonstrators. Compared with traditional continuous wave laser technologies, with their larger footprints, AE’s architecture enables orders of magnitude size-weight-power reductions on all deliverables, creating powerful, dual-use and agile systems that can fit a host of platforms while delivering very high-intensity, ultrashort pulses of light to the required target. This unique directed energy solution allows extremely high peak power and energy, with target and effects tunability, and is effective against a wide variety of potential targets.
Applied Energetics’ unique optical fiber-based laser architectures also enable unmatched wavelength agility as well as pulse duration agility. Using innovative and highly specialized frequency shifting techniques, wavelengths can be custom tuned from the deep ultraviolet to the far infrared. In addition, temporal outputs can be adjusted from continuous wave to sub-picoseconds. The technology enables the customer to adjust the lasers’ operating parameters, ultimately creating more flexibility to change wavelength and pulse width. This feature allows for optimization of laser performance for defense or commercial applications.
Our proprietary USP laser technology provides a significantly more compact solution than current continuous wave laser platforms while still delivering high peak power. Continuous wave laser systems are typically used to heat a target and, during continuous illumination, this heat transfer leads to melting or charring of the material. Using continuous wave output powers that now exceed 100 kilowatts (1kW = 1000 watts), it can take anywhere from seconds to minutes to impact a target. By contrast, Applied Energetics has delivered USP lasers to national security users that exceed five terawatts (1 TW = 1 trillion watts) in peak power, with the difference being that this peak power from a USP laser is delivered in a pulse that is less than a trillionth of a second. During this short pulse duration, and having such a high peak intensity, near-instantaneous ablation of the surface of the threat takes place. The net result of our innovative USP approaches is highly effective lasers capable of jamming, damaging, and destroying certain surveillance and reconnaissance sensors with mountable footprints that require only a fraction of the size, weight, and power requirements of other-directed energy technologies. We believe the combination of both low size, weight, and power characteristics with wavelength and pulse duration agility will help us achieve our vision statement of Directed Energy, Anywhere.
The Applied Energetics scientific team is continuously innovating with an eye toward expanding our patent portfolio to cover these technological breakthroughs and further enhance our suite of solutions for threat disruption for the Department of Defense, the intelligence community, and for commercial, biomedical and space applications with optical sources operating from the deep ultraviolet to the far infrared portions of the electromagnetic spectrum.
Applied Energetics has developed, successfully demonstrated, and holds all crucial intellectual property rights to a dynamic directed energy technology called Laser Guided Energy (LGE®) and Laser Induced Plasma Channel (LIPC®). LGE and LIPC are technologies that can be used in a new generation of high-tech directed energy systems. Applied Energetics’ LGE and LIPC technologies are wholly owned by Applied Energetics and protected by one or more of Applied Energetics’ 26 issued patents and 11 Government Sensitive Patent Applications (GSPA). These GSPA’s are held under secrecy orders of the US government, providing the company with extended protection rights.
More recently, the company has been awarded a new patent for application in the national security domain (Pulsed Laser Thermal Excitation, Patent No.: US 12,171,055 B2) and received notice of an allowed patent application in the healthcare domain (Pathogen Detection and Neutralization Using Deep UV-C Generation Via Seeded Raman Amplification and Second Harmonic Generation, Patent Application No.: US 2023/01804590 A1). The company also has eight pending patent applications. We continue to file patent applications as we deem appropriate to protect our intellectual property and enhance our competitive advantage.
As Applied Energetics looks toward the future, our corporate strategic roadmap builds upon the significant value of the company’s USP laser capabilities and key intellectual property, including LGE and LIPC, to offer our prospective partners, co-developers and system integrators a variety of next-generation ultrashort pulse and frequency-agile optical sources, from the ultraviolet to the far infrared portion of the electromagnetic spectrum, to address numerous challenges within the national security, biomedical, and advanced manufacturing market sectors.
Recent Developments
In March 2025, the company moved to the next phase of its strategic collaboration with Kord Technologies, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of KBR, to explore the potential development and integration of an advanced pulsed laser system with Kord’s FIREFLYTM High Energy Laser Weapon System (HELWS). This phase is to begin with the purchase of a specially modified Firefly HELWS unit from Kord which the company can use to work on the development and integration of its proprietary Ultrashort Pulse technology in its newly opened Battle Lab, with the assistance of Kord personnel under a related services agreement.
This teaming effort is intended to advance innovative directed energy capabilities that may create future opportunities in defense and security markets. The development and integration activities will focus on refining system performance, optimizing integration, and validating operational effectiveness, by striving to achieve key technical milestones that could lead to additional customer interest, contract opportunities, and expanded applications.
Applied Energetics had previously entered into a Memorandum of Understand (MOU) with Kord, effective October 28, 2024, to further the development and deployment of Applied Energetics’ ultrashort pulsed laser (USPL) technology for defense and national security applications. The MOU outlines key areas of cooperation, including joint research and development, integration of Applied Energetics’ USPL technologies into an existing high-energy laser directed energy platform, and the exploration of new opportunities to enhance both companies’ product portfolios.
On February 10, 2025, Applied Energetics announced the opening of its new Battle Lab, a world-class facility designed to test, demonstrate, and advance emerging laser technologies in dynamic environments. The facility, as planned, is also expected to provide the capacity to manufacture and integrate advanced lasers as Applied Energetics makes the anticipated technology transition to the next stage of its lifecycle. Over the coming months, the company intends to install and demonstrate multiple ultrashort pulse lasers with varying wavelengths against relevant target packages. This announcement follows the July 3, 2024 announcement that Applied Energetics, Inc. had exercised its option to lease more than 5,000 square feet of additional space at the University of Arizona Tech Park to support the company’s investment in a new Battle Lab, with laser manufacturing capacity to ensure it has the critical infrastructure in place to fulfill both current, and possible future, priority U.S. military programs. The company took the option to lease this additional space under the June 7, 2023, amendment (the “2023 Amendment”) to its Lease Agreement with Campus Research Corporation, as Landlord. With this expansion, the company now occupies, in the aggregate, approximately 26,000 sq. ft. of space at the Arizona Tech Park. The Battle Lab is intended to support laser system testing against relevant targets and emerging threats. The Battle Lab is expected to enable technology maturation and be the venue for customer and partner demonstrations under realistic and controlled conditions. The facility, as planned, will also provide the capability to manufacture, integrate, and test advanced lasers as Applied Energetics makes its anticipated transition of its technology to the next stage of its lifecycle.
Effective November 25, 2024, Applied Energetics elected Christopher Donaghey to serve as its President and Chief Executive Officer. The company’s Board of Directors made this determination based on Mr. Donaghey’s deep understanding of the industry, our customers’ needs and our operations. The company believes that his diverse defense industry experience and keen understanding of the need for cutting-edge solutions to address the urgent threats to national security, position him to lead the company during its next phase of growth. Mr. Donaghey served as the company’s Chief Operating and Financial Officer from August 2022, during which time he has led all aspects of Applied Energetics financial strategy, performance, reporting and long-range business planning, as well as investor relations, treasury, controller, and audit operations. He continues to serve as interim Principal Financial and Accounting Officer. Additional biographical information for Mr. Donaghey appears under “Directors, Executive Officers, and Corporate Governance” elsewhere in this Form 10-K.
During July 2024, the company’s Board of Directors, in consultation with counsel, embarked on a comprehensive review and revision to the company’s By-laws resulting, on July 17, 2024, in the board’s adoption of the company’s First Amended and Restated By-laws. The amended By-laws update several provisions to reflect the company’s current business, operations and conduct of its corporate affairs as well as changes in Delaware law, including, without limitation conduct of stockholder meetings, titles and functions of officers, board classification, indemnification, and conduct of remote stockholder meetings. A few revisions are ministerial such as that pertaining to the company’s address of record in the State of Delaware.
Effective April 1, 2024, Michael J. Alber joined our Board of Directors. A full discussion of Mr. Alber’s background, qualifications and compensation appears in Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Effective March 12, 2024, the grant previously awarded to Applied Energetics, Inc. by the Department of the Navy, Office of Naval Research (ONR) was transitioned into a contract, both of which are described in greater detail under “Ongoing Business Operations.” On September 4, 2024, the company received a funding increase on this contract of $237,647 bringing the total funding on the contract to $1,455,182.
On March 5, 2024, Applied Energetics entered into an Employment Agreement with James Harrison, PhD, pursuant to which Dr. Harrison serves as Director of New Product Innovation, commencing on April 3, 2024. Dr. Harrison continues to serve under this agreement and has been a valuable addition to our lab team.
Ongoing Business Operations
Effective August 23, 2023, Applied Energetics executed a contract with the Department of the Navy, Office of Naval Research with an aggregate contract price of $1.99 million payable over two years as the company performs its obligations under the contract. The objective of the contract is to develop a high-peak and high-average power USP optical system. The system is expected to demonstrate effects compatible with multiple Navy platforms and missions with an attractive size, weight, and power-cooling footprint. The company’s continuing development efforts in collaboration with ONR signify the importance of sustained development and maturation of USP-based directed energy systems to support the Navy’s technological priorities.
Effective May 15, 2023, Applied Energetics executed a Phase II Small Business Technology Transfer (STTR) contract with the U.S. Army at an aggregate contract price of $1.148 million payable over two years as the company performs its obligations thereunder, with the first year currently funded. The objective of this Phase II award is to further the development and testing of an IR laser system utilizing technologies that were investigated under the US Army Phase I STTR contract which the company was awarded in May 2022. This Phase II contract award follows a successful Phase I which established a computational concept with physical modeling and simulation to establish the feasibility of an IR laser system. Phase I was performed in collaboration with the James C. Wyant College of Optical Sciences at the University of Arizona. The company has continued its work under the contract, and provided all required reports, since its execution.
Effective March 12, 2024, a grant previously awarded to the company from the Department of the Navy, Office of Naval Research, was transitioned into a contract. The original grant from May 2022 had a two-year period of performance. The new contract supersedes the grant and carries a ceiling value of $1,217,535 under a base period of performance through November 11, 2024 and a 12-month unfunded option period that ends November 11, 2025. On September 4, 2024, the company received a funding increase on this contract of $237,647 bringing the total funding on the contract to $1,455,182. The purpose of this research is to accelerate the development and testing of Infrared (IR) optical technology with an ultrashort pulse laser (USPL) system. The overall objective is to advance and ruggedize optical technologies that can be fielded on a variety of USMC platforms and are able to operate in harsh conditions. Research under the grant was completed and all progress reported to the program manager.
Business Development Activities
We continue to submit proposals to, and attended briefings with, various defense and other government agencies who have expressed an interest in our technology and applications. Our efforts in this area of development have produced some results. In addition to the contracts which we have been awarded, our team has been invited to, and completed, multiple briefings focused on our capabilities and submissions. We intend to continue developing and submitting proposals and to be available to attend on-site briefings. We have also engaged in discussions with private entities and academic institutions with the objective of possibly collaborating on one or more projects. Some of these could result in further customer agreements or other opportunities to grow our business.
For fiscal year 2025, which started on October 1, 2024, the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) was delayed, but on December 23, 2024, then-President Biden signed the 2025 NDAA into law. The NDAA sets defense spending policies, while the separate appropriations bills comprising the federal budget fund government spending, including spending on defense and homeland security. This impacts all proposals under review by the Department of Defense. On September 26, 2024, in the absence of an enacted federal budget, then-President Biden signed a Continuing Resolution (CR), HR 9747, which extended government operations through December 20, 2024. He then signed a second CR for FY25 on December 21, 2024, extending funding for the federal government through March 14, 2025. A full year Continuing Resolution, H.H. 1968, was passed and signed into law by President Trump on March 15, 2025, and extends through September 30, 2025.
In addition, the newly elected administration has established the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) whose mission is to sharply reduce federal spending. In February 2025, President Trump stated that he has directed DOGE to review defense spending for possible waste, fraud and abuse. The administration has also indicated that it may pursue significant reductions to the U.S. defense budget, if both Russia and China would agree to similar cuts in their respective national security spending. The potential impact on the company of DOGE and possible cuts to the defense and national security industries, if any, is uncertain. Notwithstanding these budgetary concerns, the administration and Pentagon have indicated an interest in continuing to fund innovative defense related technologies, including in the area of directed energy.
The current budgetary and deficit funding environment, continuing inflation, tariffs and other ongoing supply chain disruptions, the appropriations process, and DOGE, among other items, all continue to create significant short and long-term challenges and risks to the company and its business development endeavors. However, we remain optimistic that the innovative nature of our technology and its novel approach to addressable threats position the company for development, growth, and market opportunities.
Strategic Plan and Analysis
The core of our strategy has been to continue growing our management and science teams with highly qualified individuals. This has driven our recruitment efforts in the areas of R&D, science, modeling and simulation, marketing and finance. We are also contemplating adding members to our Board of Directors and our Board of Advisors. Our board and leadership team have worked to align key innovations with our roadmap to encourage and enable internal filing for a broad, strategic, and robust intellectual property portfolio and continue surveying the literature for acquisitions of parallel intellectual property to that end. We also intend to pursue strategic corporate acquisitions in related fields and technology. The company’s management continues to explore any favorable equity financing opportunities.
Our goal with the Applied Energetics Strategic Plan is to increase the energy, peak power and frequency agility of USP optical sources while decreasing the size, weight, and cost of these systems. We are in the process of developing this breadth of very high peak power USP lasers and additional optical sources that have a broad range of applicability for threat disruption for the Department of Defense, commercial, and biomedical applications, such as biophotonic illumination and imaging. Although the historical market for Applied Energetics’ LGE and USP technology is the U.S. Government, the USP technologies are expected to provide numerous platforms for commercial additive and subtractive manufacturing and biomedical and imaging markets, creating a substantially larger market for our products to address. Since 2020, the Applied Energetics team has been able to develop partnership and teaming arrangements with the three leading laser and optics institutes in the United States, namely, the University of Arizona, the University of Central Florida, and the University of Rochester Laboratory for Laser Energetics.
We have continued to execute our business development plans, further our research and development program and submit filings for intellectual property and proposals for grants and contracts. During the past several years, we continued to submit proposals and have been engaged in meetings on a continuous basis with various agencies and departments both remotely and in person in Washington, DC and at various other government facilities. Having received a significant research grant and several contracts as well as other indications in recent years, we believe the interest in our technology and applications remains high, and we continue to submit proposals for all appropriate opportunities and share our vision of the disruptive capabilities of USP optical sources for both near- and far-term threats and dual-use commercial applications.
Through our analysis of the market, and in discussions with potential customers, we remain convinced that customers are becoming more receptive and interested in directed energy technologies. According to the US Department of Defense fiscal budgets from 2017 through 2023, its directed energy spending grew from approximately $500 million in 2017 to over $1.695 billion in 2023, an increase of nearly 240%. Market analysis and projections have estimated that this directed energy sector is anticipated to reach $32.1 billion globally by 2033. We continue to be optimistic about our future and the growing opportunities in directed energy applications, especially since this growth to nearly $1.7 B annually is being accomplished without a recognized Program of Record (POR) for directed energy platforms. We believe that once these technologies are funded in production for a POR, or are approved to be integrated on fielded platforms in volumes to effect threat reduction, these DOD budgets for directed energy will grow exponentially larger to support the technology insertion. The Applied Energetics team anticipates a continuation of strong funding for the directed energy community. With our existing patent portfolio, and through further advancements of our technologies, we believe we have the substantial building blocks needed to become a significant and successful developer in the USP marketplace. These innovations could play a significant role in the efforts from the new administration to implement the Golden Dome for America program by advancing directed energy and other integrated technological solutions for missile and other threat protection for the country. Estimated budget requirements would exceed $50B annually.
Our research and development programs depend on our ability to procure the necessary optical and fabricated materials, components, electronics and other supplies. A significant, prolonged increase in inflation could negatively impact the cost of materials and components, which could be a particular problem with respect to our fixed fee contracts. Within the current geopolitical context, there are ongoing embargos of exports from some global suppliers of various materials that are used in electronics and some diode and laser materials, which can have negative effects on technology supply chains. This, coupled with tariffs and other trade disruptions, could significantly impair our ability to source necessary supplies and equipment when and in quantities needed. We continuously monitor potential supply chain issues and supplier liquidity and work with our supply base to ensure adequate sources of materials at reasonable costs. In some instances, we depend upon a single source of supply, but we are developing multiple sources, both internal to AE and externally where possible to mitigate the risk. In some cases, we must comply with specific procurement requirements, which can limit the suppliers and subcontractors we may utilize.
Market for Our Technology
Unmanned semi- and fully-autonomous aerial, ground, maritime and surface vehicle threats are dramatically increasing in number and capability. As unmanned systems increasingly augment humans, sensors will saturate the battlefield. Most of these threats are piloted through cameras mounted on the vehicle. We believe these emerging threats are ideally suited for directed energy effects. The proliferation of commercial-off-the-shelf sensors and unmanned systems are providing both traditional and asymmetric forces with improved intelligence gathering and improvised threat capabilities enabling low-cost and low-tech solutions against high value targets.
Directed Energy Systems
Directed energy systems involve the use of highly focused energy such as lasers or microwaves to incapacitate, damage, or destroy enemy equipment, facilities, and assets. Previous to LGE, the only two viable directed energy systems were High Energy Laser (HEL), which uses heat to burn targets and High Power Microwave (HPM) systems, that use electromagnetic energy at specific microwave and radio frequencies to disable electronic systems.
HEL and HPM directed energy technologies have been under development for decades with numerous DoD and other government contractors participating. The unique attributes of directed energy weapon systems -the ability to create precise effects against multiple targets near-instantaneously and at a very low cost per shot-have great potential to help the DoD in addressing future warfare requirements. The DoD invests research and development dollars into directed energy solutions to fill gaps identified by warfighters. For example, in future conflicts with capable enemies possessing large inventories of guided missiles or uncrewed aerial drones, it may be operationally risky and cost-prohibitive for the U.S. military to continue to rely exclusively on a limited number of kinetic missile interceptors. Such a competition could allow an adversary to impose costs on U.S. or allied forces by compelling them to intercept each incoming missile or drone with far more expensive kinetic munitions. The DoD has made technological advances in both performance and maturity as a result of many years of research with multiple threat-intercept technologies and previously was directed by Congress, to increase funding and evaluation of pulsed laser technology in future directed energy platforms.
The main drawback to these systems tends to be the larger overall size and power requirements that makes them difficult to field more broadly. The laser was invented in 1960, and yet today, directed energy capabilities are still in the early stages of development and adoption. We believe that in order for directed energy capabilities to see an inflection point in adoption, three elements must converge: (1) increased use of a widely proliferating threat uniquely suited to being countered by directed energy systems, (2) directed energy systems that can deliver high-value effects against those threats, and (3) directed energy systems that have optimized size, weight, and power footprints that enable widespread deployment across multiple platform types and fixed sites.
Applied Energetics utilizes patented, dual-use technologies to advance critical industries. Leveraging our proprietary fiber-based architecture and wavelength- and pulse-agility capability, our ultrashort pulse technology enables users to achieve specific effects across different use cases, with an unmatched blend of size, weight and power attributes. While initially designed to meet the emerging needs and priorities for the national security community, Applied Energetics’ directed energy technology also has commercial applications in both the biomedical and advanced manufacturing industries.
Our Ultrashort Pulse Laser Systems have the following solution attributes:
1. High Peak Power allows for sub-second kills,
2. Laser wavelength can be matched to sensor wavelength,
3. Allow for a common underlying architecture across all counter-ISR applications,
4. Can be an efficient, compact and ruggedized optical fiber-based architecture.
Applied Energetics’ proprietary fiber-based architecture is a key differentiator for our technology. Compared with traditional continuous wave technology with larger footprints, AE’s architecture enables orders of magnitude size-weight-power reductions on all deliverables, creating powerful, dual-use and agile systems that can fit a host of platforms while delivering very high intensity, ultrashort pulses of light to the required target. Using this unique architecture as a laser source for an integrated system can enable Applied Energetics to develop, integrate and deliver a suite of technologies that best meet the needs and requirements of its customers.
Applied Energetics’ optical fiber-based laser architectures enable unmatched wavelength agility as well as pulse duration agility. Using innovative and highly specialized frequency shifting techniques, wavelengths can be custom tuned from the deep ultraviolet to the far infrared. In addition, temporal outputs can be adjusted from continuous wave to sub-picoseconds. The technology enables the customer to adjust the lasers’ operating parameters, ultimately creating more flexibility to change wavelength and pulse width. This feature allows for optimization of laser performance for defense or commercial applications.
Our Facilities
Our 26,800 sq ft. facility at the University of Arizona Tech Park features the following:
● 4,830 sq ft. Class 1000 cleanroom
● Multiple integrated laser labs
● Secure server room with network capability
● Dedicated inventory, shipping and receiving areas ITAR, DCSA, and NIST compliant
● Shop assembly area (outside of cleanroom)
● New space (6,458 rentable square feet ((5,520 usable)) for manufacturing and advanced laser/drone test range that we call our “Battle Lab”
Competition
AE’s Ultrashort Pulse sources, including proprietary LIPC® based LGE® technology, are unique and can be integrated onto platforms being developed for use by the U.S. Government. Over the past several years, a relatively small number of major defense contractors have received significant funding for directed energy systems development, manufacturing and integration, using continuous wave, high energy laser and microwave technologies. These contractors specialize in different directed energy system platforms to respond to a variety of threats. Applied Energetics believes that its pulsed laser systems can be a part of a layered defense solution alongside these other technologies. Although AE competes against other directed energy systems for funding, the uniqueness of our technologies should continue to support their development into weapon platform programs. AE believes that there is renewed U.S. Government interest in directed energy applications and believes that continued development of its USP capabilities and growing interest from all branches of the U.S. armed forces and other government agencies will lead to increases in government spending on directed energy in the coming years. Likewise, there are multiple new threats that must be addressed with unique and emerging technologies, and AE is working diligently to rapidly advance development, demonstration, testing and engineering of the Advanced Ultrashort Pulse lasers throughout the spectrum from the ultraviolet to the far infrared. We believe that USP technologies can rapidly accelerate in magnitude, as a percentage of the federal budget, compared with other technologies over the next several years.
AE’s primary direct USP optical source competition are corporations and contractors supported by foreign governments who may be attempting to develop similar technologies. AE believes that such foreign activity will create additional U.S. Government funding for both USP sources and LGE in order to maintain our country’s lead in pulsed directed-energy systems. Other companies with directed energy capabilities, albeit in continuous wave, microwave and other areas within directed energy, are Raytheon Technologies, Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman, Boeing, BAE Systems, nLight, General Atomics, DRS Daylight Solutions, L3Harris Technologies, BlueHalo, and Epirus. Although based on different types of directed energy, we may compete with these companies to provide solutions to problems presented by potential customers.
Some of AE’s biggest commercial competitors are Trumpf (German), Coherent (US), Thales (France). IPG (US), RAFAEL Advanced Defense Systems Ltd. (Israel), and Light Conversion (Lithuania), most of which are billion-dollar market class companies that have substantially more resources than AE.
Employees
As of March 25, 2025, we had 21 employees. We also retain outside consultants and contractors for specific projects.
Supplies and Raw Materials
Our research and development programs depend on our ability to procure the necessary optical and fabricated materials, components, electronics and other supplies. We depend upon the availability of materials and major electro-optical components as well as the performance and reliability of our suppliers. Some of our products require relatively scarce fabricated materials. We have experienced delays in obtaining certain of these supplies and materials and we have had difficulty accessing qualified suppliers of those materials. A significant, prolonged increase in inflation could negatively impact the cost of materials and components, which could be a particular problem with respect to our fixed price contracts. Within the current geopolitical context, there are ongoing embargos of exports from some global suppliers of various materials that are used in electronics and some diode and laser materials, which can have negative effects on technology supply chains. This, coupled with tariffs and other trade disruptions, could significantly impair our ability to source necessary supplies and equipment when, and in quantities, needed.
We continue to believe that conflicts overseas and related national security requirements, which limit the companies through which we can source components, pose a substantial risk. The global supply chain remains a challenge for certain products. In addition, significant, prolonged inflation could negatively impact the cost of materials and components. Our inability to procure the necessary supplies and equipment could negatively affect our results of operations, financial condition and liquidity.
In addition, our size coupled with our need for advanced, specialized components poses challenges in getting suppliers to prioritize our orders or, in some cases, fulfill them. We currently seek to procure certain specialized materials in relatively low volume which sometimes can lead to delays as we compete with larger volume customers for availability of these materials. Alternatively, as we execute our business plan, higher volume purchases, particularly of customized components, may result in longer lead times and pose other difficulties due to these and other supply constraints.
We continuously monitor potential supply chain issues and work with our suppliers to mitigate delays in our receipt of necessary materials, components and other supplies, and reduce costs, particularly in light of the supply chain issues outlined above. We also monitor supplier liquidity and work continuously with our supply base to ensure an adequate source of supply and to reduce costs. We pursue cost reductions through a number of mechanisms, including consolidating or re-sourcing our purchases, entering long-term agreements, reducing the number of suppliers, strategic global sourcing and competition among suppliers, and the opportunity to develop and deliver scarce components that have few contracts or suppliers. In some instances, we depend upon a single source of supply, but we are striving to develop multiple sources to mitigate the risk. In some cases, we must comply with specific procurement and compliance requirements, which may limit the suppliers and subcontractors we may utilize.
Regulatory Matters
Our business is subject to extensive regulation in the industries we serve. We market our technology to numerous U.S. government agencies and entities, including but not limited to all branches of the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) and the Department of Homeland Security.
The U.S. government represents all of our current revenues and likely a substantial portion of any projected revenues for the foreseeable future. U.S. government contracts are subject to termination by the government, either for convenience or for default in the event of our failure to perform under the applicable contract. In the case of a termination for convenience, we would normally be entitled to reimbursement for our allowable costs incurred, termination costs and a reasonable profit. If terminated by the government as a result of our default, we could be liable for payments made to us for undelivered goods or services, additional costs the government incurs in acquiring undelivered goods or services from another source and any other damages it suffers.
U.S. government contracts generally are subject to the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR), which sets forth policies, procedures and requirements for the acquisition of goods and services by the U.S. government. Defense contracts are additionally subject to the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS). Other applicable laws and regulations apply as well. These regulations impose a broad range of requirements, many of which are unique to government contracting, including various procurement, import and export, security, contract pricing and cost, contract termination and adjustment, audit and product integrity requirements. Failure to comply with these regulations and requirements could result in reductions to the value of contracts, contract modifications or termination, cash withholding on contract payments, forfeiture of profits, and/or the assessment of civil or criminal penalties and fines and could lead to cause-based suspension or debarment from U.S. government contracting or subcontracting for a period of time.

---

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
Future results of operations of Applied Energetics involve a number of known and unknown risks and uncertainties. Factors that could affect future operating results and cash flows and cause actual results to vary materially from historical results include, but are not limited to those risks set forth below:
Risk Related to Our Company
Our independent registered public accounting firm has expressed substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern, which may hinder our ability to obtain future financing.
In their report accompanying our financial statements, our independent registered public accounting firm stated that our financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2024 were prepared assuming that we would continue as a going concern, and that they have substantial doubt as to our ability to continue as a going concern. Our auditors have noted that our recurring losses and negative cash flow from operations and the concern that we may incur additional losses due to the reduction in government contract activity raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.
Our business has generated only limited revenues during the past two fiscal years and had a net operating loss during each period.
For the fiscal years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, we had revenues of $2,426,609 and $2,631,443, respectively, and we had net losses of $9,174,958 and $7,350,435, respectively. We can give no assurances that our planned operations will generate revenues in the future or whether any such revenues will result in profitability.
We may need additional financing to fund our operations going forward. If we are unable to obtain additional financing on acceptable terms, we may need to modify or curtail our development plans and operations.
As of December 31, 2024, we had $164,812 available cash and cash equivalents and working deficit of $67,639. We periodically conduct private bridge financings to cover certain short-term expenses, including raising approximately $6 million, in the aggregate, between January and February 2025. We believe our cash position is sufficient for the next several months, but we will likely need to raise additional capital in order to fund our operations beyond that. We must allocate funds toward SEC compliance as well as Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA), International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR) and other federal regulatory compliance. We also need funds for general and administrative expenses, including salaries, benefits, supplies and equipment, lease expense on our headquarters, accounting, legal, and other professional fees and other miscellaneous expenses. Failure to secure sufficient financing could render us unable to fund these necessary costs and expenses. We also may require additional funding for research and development before we are able to commercialize our technology. We may secure additional government contracts or sub-contracts with larger contractors to fund additional research and development. However, we may need to raise additional capital to supplement these contracts even if we are able to secure them.
Our operating plans and capital requirements are subject to change based on how we determine to proceed with respect to development programs and if we pursue any strategic alternatives. We may seek to raise additional funds through the issuance of equity securities, but such financing may not be available on terms acceptable to us if at all. Any equity financing would cause the percentage ownership by our current stockholders to be diluted, and such dilution may be substantial. Also, any additional equity securities issued may have rights, preferences or privileges senior to those of existing stockholders. If such financing is not available when required or is not available on acceptable terms, we may be required to modify or curtail our operations, which could cause investors to lose the entire amount of their investment.
Risk Related to Our Industry and Business Activities
Economic, geopolitical and other factors beyond our control can affect our business.
Our business, operating results, financial condition and liquidity may be adversely affected by changes in global economic conditions and geopolitical risks, including the inflationary environment in the United States and internationally, commodity prices, supply chain challenges, exchange rates, potential changes in policy positions or priorities, levels of government spending and deficits, the availability and cost of labor, the threat environment, trade policies, political conditions, national or international crises, including recurring global health emergencies, tariffs, trade embargoes, and other challenges that could affect the global economy, the demand for our technology and our ability to source materials and equipment. In recent years, inflationary pressures have increased labor and material costs at a higher rate higher than in prior years. Due to the nature of our government business, and the customer and supplier contracts within those businesses, we may not be able to increase our contract value or pricing to offset these cost increases, particularly with grants or fixed price contracts. This could adversely affect our operating profits and margins particularly if the increased inflation continues. Similarly, increases in interest rates from recent historical lows in the U.S. and internationally could negatively impact financial markets and tighten the availability of, and increase our cost of, capital, which could have an adverse effect on our operating results, financial condition and liquidity. Tightening credit in financial markets also could adversely affect the ability of our customers and suppliers to obtain financing for significant purchases and operations. Similarly, such tightening credit may adversely affect our supplier base and increase the potential for one or more of our suppliers to experience financial distress or bankruptcy. In addition, geopolitical and security risks could affect government priorities, budgets and policies, which could impact sales of defense and other products and services.
Changes in US government spending could negatively affect our business.
Substantially all of our current and planned near-term revenues are or may be from US government contracts and grants awarded under various programs, primarily with the Department of Defense (DoD), and, possibly, with intelligence, national security and other departments and agencies. Changes in US government spending for various reasons, including as a result of potential changes in policy positions or priorities, could negatively impact our results of operations, financial condition and liquidity. Our programs are subject to US government policies, budget decisions and appropriation processes which are driven by macroeconomic and geopolitical factors as well as Congress’s ability to enact, and the administration’s willingness to execute, appropriations bills and other legislation. In recent years, the US government has been unable to complete its budget process before the end of its fiscal year, resulting in government shutdowns and Continuing Resolutions emergency funding only at prior-year levels. In addition, failure to raise the debt ceiling could cause the U.S. government to default on debts which it has already incurred. U.S. government spending levels and available program funding are thus hard to estimate in the medium- and long-term. Significant changes in U.S. government spending or changes in U.S. government priorities, policies and requirements could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition and liquidity.
The establishment of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) whose mission is to sharply reduce federal spending, including to review defense spending for possible waste, fraud and abuse could make securing government contracts challenging. The administration has also indicated an interest in reducing spending on defense in general if Russia and China make similar commitments. The termination of government employees responsible for payment of invoices can slow down payments under our contracts and disrupt our cash flows from operating activities which, if prolonged, could cause the loss of our business. The current budgetary and deficit funding environment, continuing inflation, tariffs and other ongoing supply chain disruptions, and DOGE, among other items, pose significant risks to the company.
We face risks relating to performance of our US government contracts and our ability to secure additional contracts and/or grants.
Our success depends on our ability to complete timely and satisfactory performance on our existing customer projects and to secure additional grants and contracts. Performance delays, cost overruns, technology failures, materials or components shortages, or contract delays, could negatively impact our business prospects, results of operations, financial condition and liquidity. U.S. government contracts generally permit the government to terminate the contract, in whole or in part, without prior notice, at the U.S. government’s convenience or for default based on performance. Correspondingly, subcontracts which we may seek to enter with prime government contractors, may be terminable by the prime contractor upon government termination of the prime contract. We may be unable to secure additional contracts to offset any revenues lost as a result of the termination of any such contracts.
Because the funding of U.S. government programs is subject to congressional appropriations made on a fiscal year basis even for multi-year programs, programs are often only partially funded initially and may not continue to be funded in future years. Appropriations bills may be delayed, which may result in delays to funding, the collection of receivables and our contract performance due to lack of authorized funds to procure related products and services. Under certain circumstances, we may use our own funds to meet our customers’ delivery dates or other requirements, and we may not be reimbursed. If appropriations for programs are reduced or delayed, the U.S. government may terminate any contract or subcontract under that program.
The growth of our business depends on the development, application and manufacture of advanced technology and products aimed at achieving challenging goals. New technologies may be untested or unproven and, in some instances, product requirements or specifications need to be developed. This could result in performance difficulties, delays, cost overruns or failures which could require additional resources to address. Any failure to execute timely and effectively on our current programs could hamper future contracting opportunities. We may also need to invest in internal research and development projects in order to achieve certain grants or contracts, as our customers may demand proven concepts and solutions. These expenditures may not pay off if we are not awarded the intended grants or contracts.
Under certain types of government contracts, if we are unable to control costs or if our initial cost estimates are incorrect, our profitability could be negatively affected, particularly under fixed-price development contracts. We may also experience cost underruns which would reduce contract value and related expected revenues, and we may be unable to expand the contract scope or secure additional work to offset the resulting lost revenues. Contracts for development programs with complex design and technical challenges may be cost reimbursable. However, if they are firm fixed price or fixed price incentive contracts, such challenges and unexpected cost increases may impact our results of operations. US government contracts also require compliance with extensive and evolving procurement and other rules and regulations and subject us to potential audits, investigations, and disputes. We may also become involved in programs that are classified or otherwise restricted by the US government, which place limits on our ability to discuss our performance on these programs, including any risks, disputes and claims.
We may be unable to protect our intellectual property rights adequately, which could affect our ability to sustain the value of such assets.
Protecting our intellectual property rights is critical to our ability to maintain and protect the value of our intellectual property portfolio. We hold a number of United States patents and patent applications, as well as trademarks, and registrations which are necessary and contribute significantly to the preservation of our competitive position in the market. Any of these patents or future patent applications and other intellectual property could be challenged, invalidated or circumvented by third parties. In some instances, we may seek to augment our technology base by licensing the proprietary intellectual property of others, but we may be unable to obtain necessary licenses or to secure them on commercially reasonable terms. We have entered into confidentiality and invention assignment agreements with employees and consultants and nondisclosure agreements with suppliers, potential job candidates, and appropriate customers so as to limit access to and disclosure of our proprietary information. These measures may not suffice to deter misappropriation or independent third-party development of similar technologies. Based on our current financial condition, we may not have the funds available to enforce and protect our intellectual properties. Certain of our patents are Government Sensitive Patent Applications, meaning they are held under secrecy orders of the US government which limits our ability to develop technology under them although their expiration date is extended until such time as they are no longer classified.
We may face claims of infringement of proprietary rights.
There is a risk that a third party may claim our products and technologies infringe on their proprietary rights. Whether or not our products infringe on proprietary rights of third parties, infringement or invalidity claims may be asserted or prosecuted against us and we could incur significant expense in defending them. If any claims or actions are asserted against us, we may not have the funds necessary to defend against such claims. Our failure to do so could adversely affect the value of our intellectual property.
Security breaches, cyber-attacks, or other disruptions or incidents could expose us to liability and severely damage our operations and business development efforts.
We depend heavily on information technology systems and infrastructure for our business. We, our collaborators and our service providers collect, store, and transmit sensitive information including intellectual property, proprietary business information, and research results and related data, in connection with our business operations. The secure maintenance of this information is critical to our operations and business strategy. Some of this information could be an attractive target of criminal attacks by third parties with a wide range of motives and expertise, including organized criminal groups, “hacktivists,” disgruntled current or former employees, terrorist organizations, nation-state and nation-state supported actors, and others. The level of sophistication of cyber threats continues to grow over time.
We have cybersecurity systems in place to protect our and our customers’ proprietary information and sensitive data against the risk of inappropriate and unauthorized external use and disclosure and other types of compromise. However, these measures may prove inadequate to detect, prevent or mitigate security breaches and other incidents and we may be subject to data breaches through cyber-attacks, including ransomware, malicious code (such as viruses and worms), phishing schemes, social engineering schemes, and theft or misuse of data from inside the company. Any such breach could compromise our networks and the information stored there could be accessed, modified, destroyed, publicly disclosed, lost or stolen. If our systems become compromised, we may be unable to discover the intrusion promptly enough to mitigate any damage.
A cybersecurity breach or other incident could cause our credibility to suffer with customers. Any investigation, response, or remediation of such a breach, would result in costs in addition to possibly significant legal claims or proceedings, and possibly liability under our customer contracts. Any one of these events could cause material harm to our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Management has broad discretion over the selection of our business and prospective business opportunities.
Any person who invests in our securities will do so without an opportunity to evaluate the specific merits or risks of our prospective business and business opportunities. As a result, investors will be entirely dependent on the broad discretion and judgment of management in connection with the selection of a prospective business. The business decisions made by our management may not be successful.
We depend on the recruitment and retention of qualified personnel, and failure to attract and retain such personnel could seriously harm our business.
Due to the specialized nature of our businesses, our future performance is highly dependent upon the continued services of our key engineering and scientific personnel. Our prospects for obtaining government contracts or significant commercial contracts depend upon our ability to attract and retain qualified engineering, scientific and manufacturing personnel for our operations. Given intense competition, we may not be successful in attracting or retaining qualified personnel. Our failure to compete for these personnel could seriously harm our business, results of operations and financial condition. Additionally, since much of our business involves technologies that are or may be classified or otherwise restricted for national security reasons, we must hire U.S. citizens who have the ability to obtain a security clearance. This further reduces our potential labor pool.
Our future success will depend on our ability to develop and commercialize technologies and applications that address the needs of our markets.
Both our defense and commercial markets are characterized by rapidly changing technologies and evolving industry standards. Accordingly, our future performance depends on a number of factors, including our ability to identify emerging technological trends in our target markets; develop and maintain competitive products; enhance our products by improving performance and adding innovative features that differentiate our products from those of our competitors; develop and manufacture and bring products to market on-time and on-budget; and enter into suitable arrangements for volume production of mature products.
We believe that, to be competitive in the future, we will need to continue to develop and commercialize technologies and products, which will require the investment of financial and engineering resources. Due to the design complexity of our products, we may in the future experience delays in completing development and introduction on a commercial scale of new products. Any delays could result in increased costs of development, deflection of resources from other projects or loss of contracts.
In addition, the market for our technologies and products may not develop or expand as we currently anticipate. The failure of our technology to gain market acceptance could significantly reduce any ability to generate revenue and harm our business. Furthermore, we cannot be sure that our competitors will not develop competing or differing technologies which gain market acceptance in advance of our products. The possibility that our competitors might develop new technology or products might cause our existing technology and products to become obsolete or create significant price competition. If we fail in our new product development and commercialization efforts, or our products fail to achieve market acceptance more rapidly than our competitors, our revenue will decline and our business, financial condition and results of operations will be negatively affected.
We heavily depend on key personnel, for the successful execution of our business plan. The loss of one or more key members of our management team could have a material adverse effect on our business prospects.
We are highly dependent upon Christopher Donaghey, our President and Chief Executive Officer (and Principal Accounting and Financial Officer) and Stephen McCahon, our Chief Science Officer. We depend on Dr. McCahon’s decades of expertise for the marketing and development of our technology. We also depend upon their global visibility and outreach as well as Mr. Donaghey’s and our directors’ networks of contacts and experience to recruit key talent to the company. We do not have key-person insurance on any of these individuals. Loss of the services of any of these key members of our management team, or of our Board of Directors’ ability to identify and hire key talent, could have a material adverse effect on our business prospects, financial condition and results of operations. Although a key component of our growth strategy is succession planning and hiring additional key personnel, we may be unable to achieve this in the near term given constraints in the labor market and our interest in recruiting highly qualified professionals.
If we are unable to hire additional qualified personnel, our business prospects may suffer.
Our success and achievement of our business plans depend upon our ability to recruit, hire, train and retain additional highly qualified technical and managerial personnel. Competition for qualified employees among high technology companies is intense, and any inability to attract, retain and motivate additional highly skilled employees required for the implementation of our business plans and activities could strongly impact our business. Our inability to attract and retain the necessary technical and managerial personnel and scientific, regulatory and other consultants and advisors could materially damage our business prospects, financial condition and results of operations.
The market for our technology has a limited number of potential customers.
Given the highly specialized nature of our technology, the potential market for our products is limited to a relative few potential customers who tend to allocate significant budgeted amounts to selected projects. Currently, we are marketing our technology and focusing our research and development on the defense sector, in which demand is ultimately determined primarily by the US federal defense budget and the needs and priorities of the Department of Defense and its various agencies. The potential customers in this area are defense agencies for direct contracts and major defense contractors for subcontracts. Thus, the demand for our products depends on their needs for our technology and selecting us for research and development. Although we intend to diversify into other applications for our technology and markets, we cannot be certain that opportunities in those markets will present themselves when we are ready, or that we will otherwise be able, to do so.
We currently maintain significant cash balances at a commercial bank which could exceed the FDIC insurance limits and do not always earn a significant return.
We maintain a large percentage of our cash balances with Western Alliance Bank. At times, our bank balances exceed FDIC limits. As of December 31, 2024, $0 of our cash balance was uninsured. Significant portions of our cash balance earn little, if any, interest. We continue to monitor our banking arrangement and have taken measures to diversify our cash holdings into interest bearing cash equivalents and auxiliary cash accounts to maximize our insurance coverage.
Risks Related to Our Securities
We are subject to the penny stock rules adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission that require brokers to provide extensive disclosure to their customers prior to executing trades in penny stocks. These disclosure requirements, coupled with our status as a former shell company, may cause a reduction in the trading activity of our common stock, and make it difficult for our stockholders to sell their securities.
Rule 3a51-1 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 establishes the definition of a “penny stock,” for purposes relevant to us, as any equity security that has a minimum bid price of less than $5.00 per share or with an exercise price of less than $5.00 per share, subject to a limited number of exceptions which are not available to us. This classification would severely and adversely affect any market liquidity for our common stock.
For any transaction involving a penny stock, unless exempt, the penny stock rules require that a broker or dealer approve a person’s account for transactions in penny stocks and the broker or dealer receive from the investor a written agreement to the transaction setting forth the identity and quantity of the penny stock to be purchased. In order to approve a person’s account for transactions in penny stocks, the broker or dealer must obtain financial information and investment experience and objectives of the person and make a reasonable determination that the transactions in penny stocks are suitable for that person and that that person has sufficient knowledge and experience in financial matters to be capable of evaluating the risks of transactions in penny stocks.
The broker or dealer must also deliver, prior to any transaction in a penny stock, a disclosure schedule prepared by the SEC relating to the penny stock market, which, in highlight form, sets forth:
● The basis on which the broker or dealer made the suitability determination; and
● That the broker or dealer received a signed, written agreement from the investor prior to the transaction
Disclosure also has to be made about the risks of investing in penny stocks in both public offerings and in secondary trading and commission payable to both the broker-dealer and the registered representative, current quotations for the securities and the rights and remedies available to an investor in cases of fraud in penny stock transactions. Finally, monthly statements have to be sent disclosing recent price information for the penny stock held in the account and information on the limited market in penny stocks.
Because of these regulations and restrictions, broker-dealers may not wish to engage in the above-referenced necessary paperwork and disclosures and/or may encounter difficulties in their attempt to sell shares of our common stock, which may affect the ability of selling stockholders or other holders to sell their shares in any secondary market and have the effect of reducing the level of trading activity in any secondary market. These additional sales practice and disclosure requirements could impede the sale of our common stock. In addition, the liquidity for our common stock may decrease, with a corresponding decrease in the price of our common stock. Our common stock, in all probability, will be subject to such penny stock rules and other restrictions for the foreseeable future and our stockholders will, in all likelihood, find it difficult to sell their shares of common stock.
Because we are a former shell company, our stockholders face restrictions on their reliance on rule 144 to sell their shares.
Historically, the SEC staff has taken the position that Rule 144 under the Securities Act is not available for the resale of securities initially issued by companies that are, or previously were, shell companies, like AE. The SEC has codified and expanded this position in certain amendments to Rule 144 by prohibiting the use of Rule 144 for resale of securities issued by any shell companies (other than business combination related shell companies) or any issuer that has been at any time previously a shell company. The SEC has provided an important exception to this prohibition, however, if the following conditions are met:
● the issuer of the securities that was formerly a shell company has ceased to be a shell company;
● the issuer of the securities is subject to the reporting requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act;
● the issuer of the securities has filed all Exchange Act reports and material required to be filed, as applicable, during the preceding 12 months (or such shorter period that the issuer was required to file such reports and materials), other than Current Reports on Form 8-K; and
● at least one year has elapsed from the time that the issuer filed current comprehensive disclosure with the SEC reflecting its status as an entity that is not a shell company.
We expect that we will be able to meet all of these requirements in the future, but unknown future events and circumstances could change that outcome. As a result, pursuant to Rule 144, stockholders who receive our restricted securities in a private placement or a business combination may not be able to sell our shares without registration for up to one year after we have completed the private placement or business combination.
A large number of shares of our common stock could be sold in the market in the near future, which could depress our stock price, particularly in light of the limited trading volume and volatility in the market for our common stock which can make it illiquid.
As of March 25, 2025, we had outstanding 218,242,805 shares of common stock. Approximately 100 million of our shares are currently freely trading without restriction under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. Most of the remaining shares have been held by their holders for over one year and are thus eligible for sale under Rule 144(k) of the Securities Act. Sale of these shares into the market could depress our stock price. This is particularly true in an illiquid market characterized by limited trading volume. The market for shares of our common stock is subject to a limited trading volume and at times is volatile. The thinly traded nature of our common stock could make it difficult to sell shares at or near ask prices, if at all, particularly as additional shares enter the market for sale.
Provisions of our corporate charter documents could delay or prevent change of control.
Our Certificate of Incorporation authorizes our Board of Directors to issue up to 2,000,000 shares of “blank check” preferred stock without stockholder approval, in one or more series and to fix the dividend rights, terms, conversion rights, voting rights, redemption rights and terms, liquidation preferences, and any other rights, preferences, privileges, and restrictions applicable to each new series of preferred stock. In addition, our Certificate of Incorporation divides our board of directors into three classes, serving staggered three-year terms. At least two annual meetings, instead of one, will be required to effect a change in a majority of our board of directors. The designation of preferred stock in the future and the classification of our Board of Directors, could make it difficult for third parties to gain control of our company, prevent or substantially delay a change in control, discourage bids for our common stock at a premium, or otherwise adversely affect the market price of our common stock. Moreover, the holders of our outstanding Series A Preferred Stock have a right to put their shares to the company for an amount equal to the liquidation preference of approximately $340,000 plus unpaid dividends (approximately $397,000 as of December 31, 2024), in the event of a change of control. Such right could hinder our ability to sell our assets or merge with another company.
The redemption and dividend provisions of our outstanding preferred stock are onerous due to our current financial condition.
The company has redeemed substantially all of its outstanding preferred stock. At December 31, 2024, 13,602 shares were outstanding with a liquidation preference of approximately $340,000 and unpaid dividends of approximately $397,000. As of March 26, 2025, the liquidation preference of our outstanding preferred stock plus unpaid dividends thereon was approximately $408,000. If an event occurs that would require us to redeem the preferred stock, we may not have the required cash to do so.
In addition, our annual dividend payment on the preferred stock is approximately $34,000, which will further deplete our cash. We have not paid the dividends commencing with the quarterly dividend due August 1, 2013, and, as a result, the dividend rate has increased to 10% per annum and will remain at that level until such failure no longer continues. These terms may also make it more difficult for us to sell equity securities or complete an acquisition.
Any issuance of additional securities in conjunction with a business or financing opportunity which will result in a dilution of present stockholders’ ownership.
Our certificate of incorporation authorizes the issuance of 500,000,000 shares of common stock. As of March 25, 2025, we had approximately 218,242,805 shares of common stock issued and outstanding. If funding opportunities present themselves on favorable terms, we may issue additional shares to fund our business or in connection with our pursuit of new business opportunities and new business operations. To the extent that additional shares of common stock are issued, our stockholders would experience dilution of their respective ownership interests. If we issue shares of common stock in connection with our intent to pursue new business opportunities, a change in control of our company could occur. The issuance of additional shares of common stock may also adversely affect the market price of our common stock, particularly given the historically low trading volume in the market for our common stock.

---

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
None.

---

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
Effective March 15, 2021, we entered into a Lease Agreement with Campus Research Corporation, for approximately 13,000 rentable square feet of office, laboratory and production space located at the University of Arizona Science and Technology Park at 9070 South Rita Road, Suite 1500, Tucson, AZ. This space is outfitted with a Class 1000 (ISO Class 6) “clean room” and laboratory, office and conference facilities. The lease term began May 1, 2021, and was to end on April 30, 2026. The base rent is currently $9.2009 per rentable square foot and is set to escalate to $11.4806 in year three, $13.1740 in year four and $14.9306 in year five, plus certain operating expenses and taxes.
Effective June 7, 2023, we executed the First Amendment to Lease Agreement, which amended the existing Lease Agreement to add one new 9,805 usable square-foot suite of offices, conference rooms and cubicle areas directly across an atrium from the initial leased space so that the company now occupies the entire first floor of the building. This has enabled us to separate AE’s public facing facilities from the restricted access space. The amendment also extended the term of the original lease through July 31, 2028 and granted the company an option (the “Option”) over 6,458 rentable square feet (5,520 usable square feet) of manufacturing space. The option was effective, at a price of $2,690.83 per month, from August 1, 2023 through February 1, 2024 but was extended to July 31, 2024 . The term of occupancy in the new office space and the option both began August 1, 2023.
On July 3, 2024, we exercised the Option to support the company’s investment in a new Battle Lab, with laser manufacturing capacity to ensure it has the critical infrastructure in place to fulfill both current, and possible future, priority U.S. military programs. With this expansion, the company now occupies, in the aggregate, approximately 26,000 sq. ft. of space at the Arizona Tech Park. The Battle Lab is intended to support laser system testing against relevant targets and emerging threats. The Battle Lab is expected to enable technology maturation and be the venue for customer and partner demonstrations under realistic and controlled conditions. The facility, as planned, will also provide the capability to manufacture, integrate, and test advanced lasers as Applied Energetics makes its anticipated transition of its technology to the next stage of its lifecycle.
Our aggregate rent expense, including common area maintenance costs, was approximately $318,000 and $212,000 for 2024 and 2023, respectively. This included the cost of the option until it was exercised and the rent on the Battle Lab space thereafter. These facilities are adequate for our current and expected level of operations.
See Note 7 to our 2024 Consolidated Financial Statements, which is incorporated herein by reference for information with respect to our lease commitments as of December 31, 2024.

---

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
On January 15, 2021, the company filed a complaint in the United States District Court, Southern District of New York, against Gusrae, Kaplan & Nusbaum and Ryan Whalen for malpractice and breach of New York Rules of Professional Conduct by both parties as former counsel to the company. On May 28, 2021, Gusrae, Kaplan & Nusbaum and Mr. Whalen filed a motion to dismiss the complaint. On June 25, 2021, the company filed an opposition to the motion. On July 13, 2021, Gusrae Kaplan & Nusbaum and Mr. Whalen filed their reply brief. On March 30, 2022, United States Magistrate Judge Debra Freeman signed an order denying the motion of GKN and Mr. Whalen to dismiss the company’s claim for malpractice and for rescission of the shares-for-fees agreement under which GKN and Whalen received 1,242,710 shares of the company’s common stock. The motion was partially granted as to the separate claim for violation of NYRPC 1.7 and 1.8 because the court found that it was duplicative of the malpractice claim. The parties are currently engaged in discovery. No trial date has been set.
On July 26, 2023, the company filed a complaint in the Superior Court of the State of Delaware against Gusrae Kaplan Nusbaum PLLC and Ryan Whalen, for malicious prosecution in connection with the July 2019 suit brought in the Southern District of New York. On September 11, 2023, Gusrae, Kaplan & Nusbaum and Mr. Whalen filed a motion to dismiss the complaint. On April 16, 2024, the court granted the motion on the grounds of lack of personal jurisdiction over the defendants. The company filed a Notice of Appeal with the Supreme Court of the State of Delaware on May 2, 2024. The Delaware Supreme Court upheld the dismissal on December 18, 2024.
As with any litigation, the company cannot predict the outcome with certainty, but the company expects to provide further updates on the status of the litigation as circumstances warrant.
The company may, from time to time, be involved in legal proceedings arising from the normal course of business.

---

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURE
ITEM 4. Mine Safety Disclosure
None.
PART II

---

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASE OF EQUITY SECURITIES
Market Information and Holders
Our common stock is currently quoted for trading on the OTCQB Market, trading under the symbol “AERG”. On March 25, 2025, the closing price of our common stock on the OTCQB Market was $0.77. Over-the-counter market quotations, such as on the OTCQB, reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, mark-down or commission and may not necessarily represent actual transactions.
As of March 25, 2025, there were approximately 388 holders of record of Applied Energetics’ common stock.
Unregistered Sale of Securities and Use of Proceeds
The company has reported all information pertaining to issuances of equity securities during the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K in previously filed report on Forms 10-Q and 8-K.
Dividends
Dividends on our Preferred Stock are payable quarterly on the first day of February, May, August and November, in cash or shares of Common Stock. We paid dividends via the issuance shares of Common Stock on our 6.5% Series A Convertible Preferred Stock in 2011. We paid cash dividends on our 6.5% Series A Convertible Preferred Stock in 2012 and February and May 2013. The company has not paid the dividends commencing with the quarterly dividend due August 1, 2013. Dividends due as of December 31, 2024 and March 26, 2025 were approximately $396,630 and $408,060, respectively. Our Board of Directors suspended the declaration of the dividend, commencing with the dividend payable as of February 1, 2015, because we did not have a surplus (as such term is defined in the Delaware General Corporation Law) as of December 31, 2014. The Board anticipates continuing such suspension until such time as we have a surplus, or net profit, for a fiscal year.
Equity Compensation Plan Information
See Item 12.

---

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
ITEM 6. [RESERVED]

---

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
You should read the following discussion and analysis together with the risk factors set forth in Item 1A and with our audited Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto included elsewhere herein.
Overview
Applied Energetics, Inc. specializes in the development and manufacture of advanced high-performance lasers and optical systems, and integrated guided energy systems, for prospective defense, national security, industrial, biomedical, and scientific customers worldwide.
Christopher Donaghey serves as our President and Chief Executive Officer (and as our Principal Accounting and Financial Officer), and Dr. Stephen W. McCahon serves as our Chief Science Officer. AE has continued to expand its technical capabilities with the addition of employees, consultants and contractors, and agreements with several of the leading laser and optics universities in the country. AE also works with a team of world-class contractors to strengthen our compliance, IT, technical staff, human resources and public relations, supporting the research and development in the laboratory.
AE owns and protects intellectual property that is integral and necessary for the development of Ultrashort Pulse (“USP™”) Lasers, Laser Guided Energy (“LGE®”) and Direct Discharge Electrical products for military and commercial applications. AE currently owns 26 patents and an additional 11 Government Sensitive Patent Applications (“GSPA”). These GSPA’s are held under secrecy orders of the US government and allow the company greatly extended protection rights, including having no expiration date until such time as they are no longer classified after which they will have the normal 20-year patent protection. The company also has eight pending patent applications and one provisional patent application which is undergoing conversion to its non-provisional form. We continue to file patent applications as we deem appropriate to protect our intellectual property and enhance our competitive advantage.
In March 2025, the company moved to the next phase of its strategic collaboration with Kord Technologies, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of KBR, to explore the potential development and integration of an advanced pulsed laser system with Kord’s FIREFLYTM High Energy Laser Weapon System (HELWS). This phase is to begin with the purchase of a specially modified Firefly HELWS unit from Kord which the company can use to work on the development and integration of its proprietary Ultrashort Pulse technology in its newly opened Battle Lab, with the assistance of Kord personnel under a related services agreement.
Applied Energetics had previously entered into a Memorandum of Understand (MOU) with Kord, effective October 28, 2024, to further the development and deployment of Applied Energetics’ ultrashort pulsed laser (USPL) technology for defense and national security applications. The MOU outlines key areas of cooperation, including joint research and development, integration of Applied Energetics’ USPL technologies into an existing high-energy laser directed energy platform, and the exploration of new opportunities to enhance both companies’ product portfolios.
In February 2025, we announced the opening of our new Battle Lab, which is also expected to provide the capacity to manufacture and integrate advanced lasers as Applied Energetics makes the anticipated technology transition to the next stage of its lifecycle. Over the coming months, the company intends to install and demonstrate multiple ultrashort pulse lasers with varying wavelengths against relevant target packages. In July 2024, the company exercised its option to lease more than 5,000 square feet of additional space at the University of Arizona Tech Park to create the Battle Lab. The company took the option to lease this additional space under the June 7, 2023, amendment (the “2023 Amendment”) to its Lease Agreement with Campus Research Corporation, as Landlord. With this expansion, the company now occupies, in the aggregate, approximately 26,000 sq. ft. of space at the Arizona Tech Park.
Effective March 12, 2024, a grant previously awarded to Applied Energetics, Inc. from the Department of the Navy, Office of Naval Research was transitioned into a contract. The original grant from May 2022 had a two-year period of performance. The new contract supersedes the grant and carries a ceiling value of $1,217,535 under a base period of performance through November 11, 2024 and a 12-month unfunded option period that ends November 11, 2025. On September 4, 2024, the company received a funding increase on this contract of $237,647 bringing the total funding on the contract to $1,455,182.
Effective August 23, 2023, Applied Energetics executed a contract with the Department of the Navy, Office of Naval Research with an aggregate contract price of $1.99 million payable over two years as the company performs its obligations under the contract. The objective of the contract is to develop a high-peak and high-average power USP optical system. The system is expected to demonstrate effects compatible with multiple Navy platforms and missions with an attractive size, weight, and power-cooling footprint. The company’s continuing development efforts in collaboration with ONR signify the importance of sustained development and maturation of USP-based directed energy systems to support the Navy’s technological priorities. Work on this contract is ongoing.
Effective May 15, 2023, Applied Energetics executed a Phase II Small Business Technology Transfer (STTR) contract with the U.S. Army at an aggregate contract price of $1.148 million payable over two years as the company performs its obligations thereunder, with the first year currently funded. The objective of this Phase II award is to further the development and testing of an IR system utilizing technologies that were investigated under the US Army Phase I STTR contract which the company was awarded in May 2022. This Phase II contract award followed a successful Phase I which established a computational concept with physical modeling and simulation to establish the feasibility of an IR system. Phase I was performed in collaboration with the James C. Wyant College of Optical Sciences at the University of Arizona. The company has continued its work under the contract, and provided all required reports, since its execution.
AE’s team continues to be invited to, and complete, multiple briefings focused on our capabilities and our submissions and to submit contract proposals.
Neither of the US federal budgets for fiscal 2024 or 2023 were approved by Congress by the start of the corresponding U.S. federal government fiscal year, which is October 1 of the preceding year. In both 2024 and 2023, Congress passed, and the president signed, continuing resolutions (“CRs”), to extend federal government funding. specified dates. The final Defense Appropriations Bill for fiscal 2023 was signed into law on December 29, 2022 and included increases in areas of particular interest to the company.
For fiscal year 2025, which started on October 1, 2024, the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) was delayed, but on December 23, 2024, then-President Biden signed the 2025 NDAA into law. The NDAA sets defense spending policies, while the separate appropriations bills comprising the federal budget fund government spending, including spending on defense and homeland security. This impacts all proposals under review by the Department of Defense. On September 26, 2024, in the absence of an enacted federal budget, then-President Biden signed a Continuing Resolution (CR), HR 9747, which extended government operations through December 20, 2024. He then signed a second CR for FY25 on December 21, 2024, extending funding for the federal government through March 14, 2025. A full year Continuing Resolution, H.H. 1968, was passed and signed into law by President Trump on March 15, 2025, and extends through September 30, 2025.
Strategic Plan and Analysis
The core of our strategy has been to continue growing our management and science teams with highly qualified individuals. This has driven our recruitment efforts in the areas of R&D, science, modeling and simulation, marketing and finance. We are also contemplating adding members to our Board of Directors and our Board of Advisors. Our board and leadership team have worked to align key innovations with our roadmap to encourage and enable internal filing for a broad, strategic, and robust intellectual property portfolio and continue surveying the literature for acquisitions of parallel intellectual property to that end. We also intend to pursue strategic corporate acquisitions in related fields and technology. The company’s management continues to explore any favorable equity financing opportunities.
Our goal with the Applied Energetics Strategic Plan is to increase the energy, peak power and frequency agility of USP optical sources while decreasing the size, weight, and cost of these systems. We are in the process of developing this breadth of very high peak power USP lasers and additional optical sources that have a very broad range of applicability for threat disruption for the Department of Defense, commercial, and biomedical applications, such as biophotonic illumination and imaging. Although the historical market for Applied Energetics’ LGE and USP technology is the U.S. Government, the USP technologies are expected to provide numerous platforms for commercial additive and subtractive manufacturing and biomedical and imaging markets, creating a substantially larger market for our products to address. Since 2020, the Applied Energetics team has been able to develop partnership and teaming arrangements with the three leading laser and optics institutes in the United States, namely, the University of Arizona, the University of Central Florida, and the University of Rochester Laboratory for Laser Energetics. Our desire is to work on programs jointly where the strengths of each organization can assist in escalating knowledge and delivery of systems to the government sponsors and to train the next generation of scientists and engineers to work in the directed energy fields.
We have continued to execute our business development plans, further our research and development program and submit filings for intellectual property and proposals for grants and contracts. During the past several years, we continued to submit proposals and have been engaged in meetings on a continuous basis with various agencies and departments both remotely and in person in Washington, DC and at various other government facilities. Having received a significant research grant and several contracts since the second quarter of 2022, we believe the interest in our technology and applications remains high, and we continue to submit proposals for all appropriate opportunities and share our vision of the disruptive capabilities of USP optical sources for both near- and far-term threats and dual-use commercial applications.
Through our analysis of the market, and in discussions with potential customers, we remain convinced that customers are becoming more receptive and interested in directed energy technologies. According to the US Department of Defense fiscal budgets from 2017 through 2023, its directed energy spending grew from approximately $500 million in 2017 to over $1.695 billion in 2023, an increase of nearly 240%. Market analysis and projections have estimated that this directed energy sector is anticipated to reach $17.8 billion globally by 2028. We continue to be optimistic about our future and the growing opportunities in directed energy applications, especially since this growth to nearly $1.7 B annually is being accomplished without a recognized Program of Record (POR) for directed energy platforms. We believe that once these technologies are funded in production for a POR, these DOD budgets for directed energy will grow exponentially larger to support the technology insertion. The Applied Energetics team anticipates a continuation of strong funding for the directed energy community. With our existing patent portfolio, and through further advancements of our technologies, we believe we have the substantial building blocks needed to become a significant and successful developer in the USP marketplace.
Our research and development programs depend on our ability to procure the necessary optical and fabricated materials, components, electronics and other supplies. A significant, prolonged increase in inflation could negatively impact the cost of materials and components, which could be a particular problem with respect to our fixed fee contracts. Within the current geopolitical context, there are ongoing embargos of exports from some global suppliers of various materials that are used in electronics and some diode and laser materials, which can have negative effects on technology supply chains. We continuously monitor potential supply chain issues and supplier liquidity and work with our supply base to ensure adequate sources of materials at reasonable costs. In some instances, we depend upon a single source of supply, but we are developing multiple sources where possible to mitigate the risk. In some cases, we must comply with specific procurement requirements, which can limit the suppliers and subcontractors we may utilize.
Critical Accounting Policies
Use of Estimates
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with United States generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates, judgments and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Management bases its assumptions on historical experiences and on various other inputs and estimates that it believes to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. In addition, management considers the basis and methodology used in developing and selecting these estimates, the trends in and amounts of these estimates, specific matters affecting the amount of and changes in these estimates, and any other relevant matters related to these estimates, including significant issues concerning accounting principles and financial statement presentation. Such estimates and assumptions could change in the future as more information becomes known which could impact the amounts reported and disclosed herein.
Share-Based Payments
Stock-based compensation cost is measured at grant date, based on the fair value of the award and is recognized as an expense over the requisite service period.
The fair value of each option grant is estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes-Merton option valuation model. We make the following assumptions relative to this model: (i) the annual dividend yield is zero as we do not pay dividends on our common stock, (ii) the weighted-average expected life is based on a midpoint scenario, where the expected life is determined to be half of the time from grant to expiration, regardless of vesting, (iii) the risk free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury security rate for the expected life, and (iv) the volatility is based on the level of fluctuations in our historical share price for a period approximately equal to the weighted-average expected life. We estimate forfeitures when recognizing compensation expense and adjust this estimate over the requisite service period should actual forfeitures differ from such estimates. Changes in estimated forfeitures are recognized through a cumulative adjustment, which is recognized in the period of change and which impacts the amount of unamortized compensation expense to be recognized in future periods.
Results of Operations
Our consolidated financial information for the years ending December 31, 2024 and 2023 is as follows:
$Change % Change
Revenue $ 2,426,609 $ 2,631,443 (204,834 ) -7.8 %
Cost of revenue (1,480,093 ) (637,697 ) 842,396 -132.10 %
General and administrative (9,509,668 ) (8,771,901 ) 737,767 -8.4 %
Selling and marketing (374,710 ) (384,231 ) (9,521 ) 2.5 %
Research and development (239,060 ) (233,722 ) 5,338 -2.3 %
Other income 2,156 45,673 43,517 95.3 %
Net loss $ (9,174,958 ) $ (7,350,435 ) 1,824,523 -24.82 %
Revenue
Revenue decreased by approximately $205,000, or 7.8%, to approximately $2,427,000 for the year ended December 31, 2024, from $2,631,000 for the year ended December 31, 2023. The decrease in revenue was primarily the result of a contract modification which resulted in a decrease in a contract’s price and an increase in a contract’s term, offset by an additional one-year continuation for an existing contract and a new contract during 2024.
Cost of Revenue
Cost of revenue increased by approximately $842,000, or 132.10%, to approximately $1,480,000 for year ended December 31, 2024, from $638,000 during the year ended December 31, 2023. This increase was primarily attributable to an increase in the cost of materials, supplies and direct labor cost incurred in connection with recent contract modifications.
General and Administrative
General and administrative expenses increased approximately $738,000, or 8.4%, to $9,510,00 for the year ended December 31, 2024, compared to approximately $8,772,000 for the year ended December 31, 2023, primarily due to an increase in salaries and employee benefits of approximately $720,000 mainly due to non-cash compensation, an increase in software and licenses of approximately $40,000, an increase in depreciation expense of approximately $70,000 and increase of rent of $204,000, partially offset by a decrease of approximately $377,000 in professional and consulting expenses.
Selling and Marketing
Selling and Marketing expenses decreased approximately $9,500, or 2.5%, to $375,000 for the year ended December 31, 2024, compared to approximately $384,000 for the year ended December 31, 2023, primarily due to the continuation of business development activities through our Master Services Agreement with Westpark Advisors as well as other consultants in this field.
Research and Development
Research and development expenses increased approximately $5,300, or 2.3%, to $239,000 for the year ended December 31, 2024, compared to approximately $234,000 for the year ended December 31, 2023, primarily due to an increase in labor and material cost associated with continued development.
Other Income/(Expense)
Other income decreased approximately $44,000, or 95.3%, to $2,000 for the year ended December 31, 2024, compared to other expenses of $46,000 for the year ended December 31, 2023, primarily due to unused funds in cash equivalents reclassed for development purposes.
Net Loss
Our operations in 2024 resulted in a net loss of approximately $9,174,000, an increase of approximately $1,824,000, or 24.8%, compared to the approximately $7,350,000 net loss for the year ended 2023, primarily due to increases in general and administrative and research and development expense, partially offset by lower revenue and a decrease in selling and marketing expenses.
Trend Discussion
During the year ended December 31, 2023, as we received our ONR contract and a Phase II STTR contract with the Army, we recognized revenues as we performed these services and also recorded related costs. Costs under these contracts continue to be affected by ongoing supply chain disruptions, and shortages of items like semiconductor chips, and related systemic issues, and general inflation although to a lesser extent than in 2022. In particular, micro-electronic and semiconductor chip shortages are still impacting supply chains, and as such, can impact our ability to execute and deliver technology to meet demands of our customers. Certain optical transmitting components are also in short supply. These costs and supply issues also may affect any internal research and development programs, and we anticipate that they will continue for at least the near term.
Our costs and the timing of our performance under grants and contracts continue to be affected by trends in the US labor market, particularly, recruiting of scientists and technicians. We had observed some limited availability in this market in 2022 with some improvement in 2023, and we anticipate being able to locate and retain the necessary personnel for the foreseeable future.
The new administration and related changes in the structure and operations of the federal government are introducing new challenges for our operations and financial projections. It is difficult to forecast the effect that recently introduced tariffs will have on our ability to source raw materials, supplies, and equipment needed to continue our operations both for the performance of our ongoing contractual obligations and our internal research and development efforts. Moreover, the cut to funding and reductions in federal government personnel can have a significant impact on our cash flows and ability to continue operating. Many of these cuts are proposed to the Departments of Defense and Homeland Security budgets which are the focus of much of our business development efforts.
Certain mitigating factors could blunt any potential impact of these changes on our industry. The DOD and others in the administration have indicated that funding for innovation and novel technologies will continue to be a priority, and directed energy has been discussed as part of this trend. Also, many of the cuts are being challenged in court and, in some cases, reversed either because of judicial rulings or policy reversals. However, it is difficult to predict precisely where funds will be cut or allocated, and even a general reduction in force can make administrative functions, such as finalizing contracts and government payment processing, challenging. These factors could severely impact our cash flows and our ability to continue operating.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
The accompanying financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. At December 31, 2024, the company had total current assets of $664,779 and total current liabilities of $732,418, resulting in a working capital deficit of $67,639. At December 31, 2024, we had $164,812 cash and cash equivalents, a decrease of $1,154,714 from $1,319,526 at December 31, 2023.
During the year ended December 31, 2024, the net cash outflow from operating activities was $5,092,690. This amount was comprised primarily of our net loss of $9,174,958. This was offset by non-cash stock-based compensation expense of $3,768,819, amortization of prepaid assets of $224,625, depreciation and amortization expense of $ 218,907, and the amortization of right of use assets of $214,690. Additionally, net cash used from changes in assets and liabilities totaled $344,773. This included a decrease in accounts receivable of $231,953 and accrued expenses and compensation of $22,643. This was offset by a decrease in deferred revenue of $308,908, prepaid and deposits of $51,113, and a decrease in operating lease liabilities of $184,871 and a decrease in accounts payable of $54,477.
During the year ended December 31, 2024, the net cash outflow from investing activities was $98,847. This was for the purchase of equipment.
During the year ended December 31, 2024, net cash provided by financing activities was $4,036,823, which consisted mainly of repayment of our note payable of $141,977, payment of $82,300 to the IRS for tax withholding related to the share settlement of RSUs issued to employees, offset by $4,171,601 in proceeds from sale of common stock and $89,499 in proceeds from the exercise of options.
Based on the company’s current business plan, we believe our cash balance as of the date of this report, along with anticipated revenues from our contract anticipated contract revenue, will be sufficient to meet the company’s anticipated cash requirements for the near term. However, we cannot be certain that the current business plan will be achievable.
The company’s existence depends upon management’s ability to develop profitable operations. Management is devoting a significant portion of its efforts to developing additional business and raising capital, as needed, but cannot be certain that these efforts will be successful. Management’s business development efforts may not result in profitable operations. To fund its research and development and marketing efforts, the company’s management continues to explore possible financing opportunities through discussions with investment bankers and private investors. The company may not be successful in its effort to secure additional financing on terms it considers favorable. The accompanying consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result should the company be unable to continue as a going concern. In January and February 2025, the company raised approximately $6 million through the private placement of shares of its common stock, par value, $0.001 per share, some of which were underlying pre-funded common stock purchase warrants, in a private sale to individual purchasers at a price of $0.75 per share (or $0.749 per underlying share for pre-funded warrants), all to accredited, sophisticated investors
Additionally, international, macroeconomic events, including the Russian military action in Ukraine and related economic sanctions around the globe could impact the company’s ability to source necessary supplies and equipment which could materially and adversely affect our ability to continue as a going concern. These events may also impair our ability to raise capital, including as a result of increased market volatility, or decreased market liquidity, which also affects the company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Third-party financing may become unavailable on terms acceptable to the company or at all. The impact of such events on the world economy and the specific impact on the company’s financial position and results of operations are difficult to predict. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.
Budgeting for upcoming expenses and costs of supplies and equipment needed to perform our existing, and any future, grants or contracts requires that we estimate factors such as inflation and geo-political events that affect such expenses and costs. Although inflation generally moderated in 2023, the cost of labor continues to increase across certain sectors of the US and global economy which may drive up our general and administrative expenses as well as the cost of personnel working directly and indirectly on our grants and contracts, particularly given the highly skilled nature of this work. Inflation has also impacted the price of supplies and materials we must purchase in order to perform grants and contracts, some of which may have been bid on based on cost structures which were submitted during periods of lower inflation. In addition, geo-political events have further limited the number of countries from which we can source certain supplies and equipment. These limitations can range from outright prohibitions to strong discouragement based on potentially sensitive information. We continually monitor these events and the markets for needed supplies in order to make the best estimates possible, both in our internal budgeting and in any bids or proposals we submit.
Contractual Obligations:
The following table summarize our contractual obligations and other commercial commitments as of December 31, 2024:
Payment by Period
Total Less than
1 Year 1 to 5 Years
Notes payable $ 47,000 $ 47,000 $ -
Due to affiliate 50,000 50,000 -
Leases 1,211,000 265,400 945,700
Total $ 1,308,000 $ 362,400 $ 945,700
The above table does not include the dividends on our Series A Preferred Stock. Assuming that there is no conversion of the outstanding shares of Series A Preferred Stock into shares of common stock, the dividends are approximately $34,000 each year (approximately $9,000 each quarter).
Leases
In March 2021, the company signed a five-year lease for an 11,000 usable square foot (13,000 rentable square foot) laboratory/office space in Tucson. The lease term commences May 1, 2021 and ends on April 30, 2026. The base rent is $6.7626 per rentable square foot for year one, and escalates to $9.2009 in year two, $11.4806 in year three, $13.1740 in year four and $14.9306 in year five, plus certain operating expenses and taxes.
On June 7, 2023, the company entered into an amendment to extend the term of the original lease from April 26, 2026 to July 31, 2028. Included in the lease amendment is extension space commencing on August 1, 2023. As of August 1, 2023, the company has secured additional square footage in the amount of 9,805 square feet. The initial base rent for the expansion space was $9.10 per rentable square foot for year one, and escalated to $10.20 in year two, $11.30 in year three, $12.40 in year four and $13.50 in year five, plus certain operating expenses and taxes.
The amendment also granted the company an option (the “Option”) over 6,458 rentable square feet (5,520 usable square feet) of manufacturing space. The option was effective, at a price of $2,690.83 per month, from August 1, 2023 through February 1, 2024 but was extended to July 31, 2024. The term of occupancy in the new office space and the option both began August 1, 2023.
On July 3, 2024, we exercised the Option to support the company’s investment in a new Battle Lab. With this expansion, the company now occupies, in the aggregate, approximately 26,000 sq. ft. of space. Our aggregate rent expense, including common area maintenance costs, was approximately $318,000 and $212,000 for 2024 and 2023, respectively. This included the cost of the option until it was exercised and the rent on the Battle Lab space thereafter. These facilities are adequate for our current and expected level of operations.
Preferred Stock
The Series A Preferred Stock has a liquidation preference of $25.00 per share. The Series A Preferred Stock bears dividends at an initial rate of 6.5% of the liquidation preference per share per annum, which accrues from the date of issuance, and is payable quarterly. We have not paid dividends commencing with the quarterly dividend due August 1, 2013 and, as a result, the dividend rate has increased to 10% per annum and will remain at that level until such failure is cured. Dividends due as of December 31, 2024, and March 26, 2025, were approximately $397,000 and $408,000, respectively.
The holders of the Series A Preferred Stock have a right to put the stock to the company for an aggregate amount equal to the liquidation preference approximately $340,000 plus unpaid dividends of $397,000 as of December 31, 2024, in the event of a change in control. Dividends are payable in: (i) cash, (ii) shares of our common stock (valued for such purpose at 95% of the weighted average of the last sales prices of our common stock for each of the trading days in the ten trading day period ending on the third trading day prior to the applicable dividend payment date), provided that the issuance and/or resale of all such shares of our common stock are then covered by an effective registration statement or (iii) any combination of the foregoing. As of December 31, 2024, there were 13,602 shares of Series A Preferred Stock outstanding.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements:
Refer to Note 3 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for a discussion of recent accounting standards and pronouncements.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangement:
As of December 31, 2024, we had no significant off-balance sheet arrangements.

---

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET RISK
In the normal course of business, our financial position is subject to a variety of risks, such as the ability to collect our accounts receivable and the recoverability of the carrying values of our long-term assets. We do not presently enter into any transactions involving derivative financial instruments for risk management or other purposes.
Our available cash balances are deposited in bank demand deposit accounts and money market funds. Substantially all of our cash flows are derived from our operations within the United States and today we are not subject to market risk associated with changes in foreign exchange rates.

---

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
Our Consolidated Financial Statements, the related notes and the Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firms thereon, are included in Applied Energetics’ 2024 Consolidated Financial Statements and are filed as a part of this report on page following the signatures.

---

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.

---

ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Conclusion Regarding the Effectiveness of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer (and Principal Financial Officer), has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2024. The term “disclosure controls and procedures,” as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”), means controls and other procedures of a company that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by a company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by a company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the company’s management, including its chief executive and principal financial officers, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well-designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving their objectives and management necessarily applies its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures. Based on that evaluation our Chief Executive Officer (and Principal Financial Officer) concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of December 31, 2024.
Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) or 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act. Internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, our chief executive and principal financial officers and effected by our Board of Directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that:
● pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the company’s assets;
● provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of the management and directors of the company; and
● provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Our management, including our Chief Executive Officer (and Principal Financial Officer) (“CFO”), has conducted an assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2024, based on the framework established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the COSO Framework). This assessment included an evaluation of the design of our internal control over financial reporting and testing of the operational effectiveness of those controls. This assessment also took into consideration a material weakness cited by our auditors. In particular, our auditors noted lack of segregation of duties and written policies and procedures with the accounting functions and evidence of control review in that we have not designed such policies and procedures at a sufficient level to support the operating effectiveness of controls to prevent and detect potential error. To mitigate this weakness, our auditors suggested that the company continue to maintain sufficient accounting personnel to ensure segregation of duties and accurate accounting records, noting that we use an outside consultant to perform day-to-day review function and that we create, document and maintain policies and procedures. Our management intends to take this guidance into consideration as we work to resolve this weakness. Based on our assessment under the criteria described above, the CFO has concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was not effective as of December 31, 2024.
This Annual Report on Form 10-K does not include an attestation report of our registered public accounting firm regarding internal controls over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by our registered public accounting firm pursuant to the SEC rules that permit smaller reporting companies to provide only management’s attestation in an Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There has been no change in Applied Energetics’ internal control over financial reporting for the quarter ended December 31, 2024, that materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect our internal control over financial reporting.

---

ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION
Rule 10b5-1 Trading Arrangements
During the three months ended December 31, 2024, no director or officer adopted or terminated any contract, instruction, or written plan for the purchase or sale of securities of the Company pursuant to Rule 10b5-1(c) or any non-Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement (as defined in Item 408(c) of Regulation S-K).

---

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
The following is information with respect to our executive officer and directors:
Name
Age
Principal Position
Director Term Expiring in
Director Since
Bradford T. Adamcyzk
Director and Executive Chairman
2.5 years
March
Gregory J. Quarles
Director
1.5 years
May
Christopher, Donaghey
President and Chief Executive Officer (and Principal Financial Officer)
N/A
N/A
Michael J. Alber
Director
1.5 years
April
John E. Schultz Jr.
Director
Less than one year
November
Mary P. O’Hara
Director, General Counsel, Chief Legal Officer and Secretary
2.5 Years
August 2021
Stephen W. McCahon
Chief Science Officer
N/A
N/A
* Mr. Quarles served as President and Chief Executive Officer until November 25, 2024, upon which Mr. Donaghey assumed this role. Mr. Donaghey served as Chief Operating and Financial Officer until November 25, 2024 and continues to serve as Principal Financial Officer for SEC reporting purposes.
Bradford T. Adamczyk: Mr. Adamczyk was elected as the company’s Chairman in May 2019 and Executive Chairman in November 2021. He served as the company’s Principal Executive Officer from August 6, 2018, until becoming Chairman and was elected as a company director on March 8, 2018. Mr. Adamczyk has over 25 years of experience in investments and financial analysis. He founded MoriahStone Investment Management in 2013. MoriahStone Investment Management specializes in both public equities and small-cap private companies. He has also served on the board of advisors of BroVo Spirits, LLC since 2014, becoming its Chairman in 2018. Prior to founding MoriahStone, he was a senior securities analyst at Columbus Circle Investors in Stamford, CT, where he focused on technology investments. Mr. Adamczyk started his financial career at Morgan Stanley. Additionally, Mr. Adamczyk helped drive the initial recapitalization efforts of Applied Energetics in 2018. He was part of the team that led the 2018 proxy of AE, establishing a new company board and management team and recapitalizing the company to pursue the development of its technology and IP portfolio. He received his undergraduate degree from Western Michigan University, graduating Magna Cum Laude, and his MBA from the University of Michigan.
Gregory J. Quarles: Dr. Quarles currently serves at the CEO Emeritus and jointly as the Executive for Government and Institutional Relations, effective November 25, 2024. Prior to this transition, he was elected as the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and as a Company director effective May 4, 2019. In January 2021, the Board of Directors also elected him as President of the Company. Prior to May 2019, he had served on the Company’s Scientific Advisory Board since March 18, 2017. Before joining Applied Energetics, Dr. Quarles spent eight years with Optica (formerly, The Optical Society of America) in Washington D.C., both as a member of the Board and the Executive Committee (three years) and more recently as the Chief Scientific Officer (five years). His responsibilities at Optica encompassed a broad range of scientific, technical and engineering infrastructure, and included content development for the Optica meetings portfolio, along with many other related projects, highlighted by his reports to Congress. Moreover, Dr. Quarles had been personally involved through Optica in the establishment of many crucial partnerships involving major R&D laboratories and global agencies worldwide. This involvement included being a long-standing member of the U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Industry and Security, and Sensors and Instrumentation Technical Advisory Committee. In addition to his executive leadership, Dr. Quarles is a well-respected member of the laser development community globally with over 35 years of experience since the award of his Ph.D. from Oklahoma State University. He has served on the board of directors of Nanocerox, Inc., a private company, since 2011, and on the Physics Department Advisory Board of Oklahoma State University, and the LLE Advisory Board of the University of Rochester, since 2017 and 2021, respectively. He is a Fellow in both the SPIE and Optica, a Senior Member of the IEEE and received the Memorial D.S. Rozhdestvensky Medal from the Russian Optical Society (2015). In 2016, he joined the Oklahoma State University CAS Hall of Fame, and in 1996 received the R&D 100 Award for the Ce:LiSAF Laser System.
Christopher Donaghey: Mr. Donaghey has served as the company’s President and Chief Executive Officer (and Principal Financial Officer) since November 25, 2024. Prior to that date, he served as the company’s Chief Operating and Financial Officer from July 2022. He continues to function as the company principal financial officer. Mr. Donaghey is an experienced financial executive with extensive experience in the defense industry. Mr. Donaghey most recently served as senior vice president and head of corporate development for Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC), a defense and government agency technology integrator, where he was responsible for executing the company’s mergers and acquisitions (M&A) and strategic ventures strategy. He joined SAIC in 2017, as senior vice president of finance for SAIC’s operations. Mr. Donaghey is also a Founder and Executive Board member of the Silicon Valley Defense Group, a non-profit organization whose mission is to create the nexus of pioneering ideas, people, and capital that will unlock new sources of innovation for national security and power the digital evolution of the defense industrial base. Prior to joining SAIC, Donaghey was Vice President of Corporate Strategy and Development for KeyW Corporation, a national security solutions provider for the intelligence, cyber and counterterrorism communities, where he guided the overall corporate strategy, M&A, and capital markets activities. Mr. Donaghey was also a senior research analyst for SunTrust Robinson Humphrey Capital Markets during which time, he was ranked the number one defense analyst and number two analyst overall for stock selection by Forbes/Starmine in 2005 and was named in the Wall Street Journal Best on the Street survey in 2005, 2008, and 2009. Mr. Donaghey served in the U.S. Navy Reserve where he provided scientific and technical analysis of missile guidance and control systems and advanced electronics for the Short-Range Ballistic Missile group at the Defense Intelligence Agency’s Missile and Space Intelligence Center. Donaghey earned his bachelor’s degree in mechanical engineering from Texas Tech University and served as an officer in the U.S. Navy. Mr. Donaghey served on Applied Energetics’ Board of Advisors from April 30, 2019 until becoming Chief Operating and Financial Officer.
John E. Schultz Jr.: Mr. Schultz has had a long affiliation with Wall Street, having founded CSG Spectra, Inc., a risk analytics firm, in 1984. He also founded Oak Tree Asset Management Ltd. in 2000, where he actively trades securities in managed LLC’s. Mr. Schultz’s strong networks have emphasized outside-the-box investment opportunities and early-stage new frontier private equity investment deals. Mr. Schultz has an intimate knowledge of Applied Energetics, including its history and financials and has in the past served as a consultant to the company. Additionally, Mr. Schultz helped drive the initial recapitalization efforts of Applied Energetics in 2018. He was part of the team that led the 2018 proxy of Applied Energetics, establishing a new company board and management team and recapitalizing the Company to pursue the development of its technology and IP portfolio. Mr. Schultz is a graduate of California State University at Long Beach.
Mary P. O’Hara: Ms. O’Hara was appointed General Counsel and Chief Legal Officer in January 2022 and Secretary in September 2022. She has been in private law practice for over thirty years and has broad experience in all facets of securities, corporate and commercial law. Prior to her joining the Company full time, she was affiliated with the law firm of Masur, Griffitts, Avidor, LLP (now known as Griffitts LLP) and had represented the Company for several years. Previously, she was a partner at Hodgson Russ LLP and an associate at Fulbright & Jaworski LLP (now known as Norton Rose Fulbright) and Mayer Brown & Platt, LLP (now known as Mayer Brown LLP). Ms. O’Hara has a J.D. from New York University School of Law and a B.A. in Economics, magna cum laude, from the University of New Mexico.
Stephen W. McCahon: Dr. Stephen McCahon has served as the Company’s Chief Science Officer since May 1, 2023. Dr. McCahon has been a scientific researcher, technology developer, and entrepreneur for over 30 years. He has co-authored more than 50 scientific publications and has more than 30 patents issued, patents pending, or invention disclosures in preparation for patent submission. He was an original founder of Applied Energetics, Inc. and then returned to the Company to serve as our Chief Scientist, pursuant to a Consulting Agreement, dated as of May 24, 2019, providing input into the strategic direction of the Company and assistance in building relationships in the defense markets. Dr. McCahon was a Member of the Research Staff in the Optical Physics Department at the Hughes Research Laboratory in Malibu, California from 1986 to 1996 performing basic research in the area of optical physics and non-linear optical materials. In 1996, Dr. McCahon moved to Raytheon (Hughes) Missile Systems Co, in Tucson, AZ during which time he was significantly responsible for the successful creation and development of the Directed Energy Weapons Product Line and served as its Chief Scientist. He left Raytheon in 2002 to co-found Applied Energetics Inc. in Tucson, AZ to develop Directed Energy Weapons for the Defense Department including very high energy and average power ultrashort pulse (USP) laser sources and Laser Guided Energy (LGE®) technologies. In April 2010, he left Applied Energetics to form Applied Optical Sciences where he developed technologies related to the application of optical physics to a broad range of areas, including photonics and USP laser development. From February 2016 through May 2019, he served as a consultant to the Company. In 2019, Applied Energetics purchased substantially all of the assets of Applied Optical Sciences, integrating it into Applied Energetics, and retained him as Chief Scientist through the above-mentioned Consulting Agreement. He served as Chief Scientist under this Consulting Agreement until the board appointed him Chief Science Officer on May 1, 2023. Dr. McCahon is a graduate of the University of Southern California (BSEE, MSEE) and holds a Ph.D., Photonics, Inter-disciplinary Physics and Electrical Engineering, from the University of Iowa.
Michael J. Alber Mr. Alber has an extensive career spanning over 35 years in corporate finance, capital markets, treasury, risk allocation and mergers and acquisition experience. From April 2021, he was the Chief Financial Officer and Founder of First Light Acquisition Group (NYSE: FLAG), a special purpose acquisition company. He previously served on the SSA (Special Security Agreement) of AceInfo Tech (subsidiary of Dovel Technologies) and advisory board of Sincerus Global Solutions. From June 2016, he was the Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President of KeyW (NASDAQ: KEYW), until its sale to Jacobs (NYSE: J) in June 2019. During this period, he led several capital market transactions along with two strategically important M&A transactions, one that resulted in a record setting sale multiple and change in control. Mr. Alber served as a Principal with Growth Strategy Leaders, a business and financial consulting firm (specializing in M&A and due diligence support), from April 2015 to May 2016, and as Chief Financial Officer and SVP at Engility Corporation (NYSE: EGL) a $2.5 billion technology services and solutions provider to both U.S. Government and International customers from May 2012 to March 2015. During this period, he supported the company’s spin-out from L3 Technologies as a stand-alone publicly traded company. Prior to Engility, Mr. Alber held the position of Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer at Alion Science and Technology from 2007 to 2012. He has also held senior executive positions at SAIC (NYSE: SAIC) for 18 years, where he served as a Senior Vice President and Group CFO, and prior to that was Director of Finance at Network Solutions, Inc. He has served on the board of directors of Sincerus Global Solutions, a private company, since October 2022. Mr. Alber received his Bachelor of Science degree from George Mason University in Business Administration with a concentration in finance and subsequently completed an Advanced Management Program (AMP) at Georgetown University’s McDonough School of Business.
Directors Qualifications, Experience and Skills
Our directors bring to our Board a wealth of executive leadership experience and technical knowledge derived from their service, respectively, as senior executives, founders of industry and legal or financial professionals. Our board members have demonstrated strong business acumen and an ability to exercise sound judgment and have a reputation for integrity, honesty and adherence to ethical standards. When considering whether directors and nominees have the experience, qualifications, attributes and skills, taken as a whole, to enable the Board of Directors to satisfy its oversight responsibilities effectively in light of the company’s business and structure, the Board of Directors focuses primarily on the information discussed in each of the Directors’ individual biographies set forth above and the specific individual qualifications, experience and skills as described below:
● Mr. Adamczyk’s qualifications as a director include his expertise in corporate finance, equity capital markets, corporate strategy and organizational planning. Mr. Adamczyk was part of the team that led the 2018 proxy of AE, establishing a new company board and management team and recapitalizing the company to pursue the development of its technology and IP portfolio. He, along with the others in this group, continues his work to establish a foundation of good corporate governance and transparency.
● Dr. Quarles’s qualifications as a director include his experience as director and senior executive in the laser industry with primary focus on the defense and aerospace sector.
● Mr. Schultz’s qualifications as a director include his expertise in the equity investment industry and has been a friend of Applied Energetics since its public inception in 2004 and has an intimate knowledge of the company’s background, including its history and financials. Mr. Schultz and his entity Oak Tree Asset Management were part of the team that led the 2018 proxy, establishing a new company board and management team and recapitalizing the company to pursue the development of its technology and IP portfolio. He, along with the others in this group, continues his work to establish a foundation of good corporate governance and transparency.
● Ms. O’Hara’s qualifications as a director include her many years of experience in securities, corporate and commercial law and the business and financial knowledge she has acquired over those years as well.
● Mr. Alber’s qualifications as a director include 30+ years of experience serving in executive leadership positions within both public and private companies, possessing a strong balance of strategic thinking, business acumen and operational skills. He has served as a finance executive, with particular experience with publicly listed government contractors where he has navigated challenging situations and handled many of the issues that typically face growing companies in this space. He also has experience with stock exchange listings and knows the relevant processes, criteria, and requirements as well as extensive experience with capital restructuring transactions, including initial public offering (IPO), multiple debt/equity offerings, new credit facilities, and equity buy-back programs. He has led multiple strategic acquisitions, divestitures and reorganizations to drive growth, diversification, and shareholder value.
Section 16(A) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires certain officers and directors of Applied Energetics, and any persons who own more than ten percent of the common stock outstanding to file forms reporting their initial beneficial ownership of shares and subsequent changes in that ownership with the SEC. Officers and directors of Applied Energetics, and greater than ten percent beneficial owners are also required to furnish us with copies of all such Section 16(a) forms they file. Based on a review of these filings, two reports on Form 4 for the company’s President and CEO (then COO and CFO) reporting a change in beneficial ownership were filed after their respective deadlines. The company does not believe any other officers or directors failed to timely file any required forms under Section 16(a) during the year ended December 31, 2024.
Code of Ethics
Applied Energetics has adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that applies to all of Applied Energetics’ employees and directors, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer (and principal accounting officer). Applied Energetics’ Code of Business Conduct and Ethics covers all areas of professional conduct including, but not limited to, conflicts of interest, disclosure obligations, insider trading, confidential information, as well as compliance with all laws, rules and regulations applicable to Applied Energetics’ business.
Our Code of Ethics and Business Conduct is available upon request made to us in writing at the following address, and will be provided without charge:
Applied Energetics, Inc.
Attention: Chief Legal Officer
S. Rita Road, Suite 1500
Tucson, AZ 85747
Committees of the Board of Directors
The members of the Board of Directors continue to evaluate the need and utility of establishing one or more committees of the Board of Directors and to review relevant legal or regulatory requirements with respect thereto. At present all functions that would be fulfilled by committees are being fulfilled by the entire board, and the board believes that currently no committees are necessary or legally required. Although, as a “smaller reporting company” on the OTCQB Market, the Company is not currently required to have Independent Directors, the Board of Directors believes that Messrs, Adamczyk, Schultz, and Alber qualify as Independent Directors, as defined in the OTCQB Standards.

---

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Summary Compensation Table
The following table discloses the compensation for the persons who served as our President and Chief Executive Officer, Chief Operating and Financial Officer, General Counsel, Chief Legal Officer and Secretary, and Chief Science Officer for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023. Mr. Donaghey served as our Chief Operating and Financial Officer from July 2022 until becoming President and CEO (and Principal Financial Officer) in November 2024. Dr. Quarles served as our Chief Executive Officer from May 6, 2019 and President since January 2022 through November 2024 when he became CEO Emeritus. Ms. O’Hara was appointed General Counsel and Chief Legal Officer in January 2022 and Secretary in September 2022. Dr. McCahon has served as Chief Science Officer since May 2023.
Name and Principal Position Year Salary
($) Bonus
($) Stock
Awards
($) Option
Awards
($) All Other
Compensation(1) Total
Christopher Donaghey, $ 354,167 (1) $ - $ - $ 656,582 $ - $ 1,010,749
President and Chief Executive Officer (and Principal Financial Officer) $ 350,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 350,000
Gregory J Quarles, $ 400,000
Chief Executive Officer Emeritus $ 400,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 400,000
Mary P. O’Hara, $ 250,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 250,000
General Counsel, CLO and Secretary $ 250,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 250,000
Stephen McCahon, $ 350,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 350,000
Chief Scientist $ 300,000 (2) $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 300,000
(1) Mr. Donaghey’s salary is based on an annual amount of $350,000 for the first 11 months of 2024 and of $400,000 for the last one month of 2024.
(2) This amount reflects compensation received by Dr. McCahon pursuant to the Consulting Agreement with SWM Consulting LLC, an entity which he controls, through April 30, 2023 and pursuant to his Executive Employment Agreement from May 1 through December 31, 2023.
Director Compensation
The following table discloses our director compensation for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023:
Name Year Fees
Earned or
Paid in
Cash ($) Stock
Awards
($) Option
Awards ($)
(1) All Other
Compensation
($) Total
Bradford T. Adamczyk, $ 215,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 215,000
Executive Chairman $ 215,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 215,000
Michael J. Alber $ - $ - $ 419,028 $ - $ 419,028
$ N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
John E. Schultz, Jr. $ 90,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 90,000
$ 90,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 90,000
Board Considerations in Determining Salaries
Our executive compensation program is designed to attract, retain, and incentivize talented executives with a dedication to achieving our scientific and strategic objectives. Our 2024 compensation program consisted primarily of base salary as we awarded certain officers time vesting equity during prior years. Mr. Donaghey received additional options and an increase in salary as consideration for his acceptance of the position of President and Chief Executive Officer. Compensation of our named executive officers is primarily determined by compensation levels in the market for their services, among large- and small-cap defense and technology companies. The Board considers recommendations from various outside consultants and other informed sources in making compensation decisions. Aligning executive compensation with stockholder interests is a key consideration for our compensation program. As we continue to grow, we anticipate developing and evolving our compensation program around specific objectives and key responsibilities with metrics and compensation targets.
Employment Agreements for Named Executive Officers
Effective November 25, 2024, we entered into an Executive Employment Agreement with Christopher Donaghey setting forth the terms of his service as President and Chief Executive Officer. The agreement is for a term of three years and is renewable thereafter for sequential one-year periods. The agreement may be terminated by the company for “Cause” or by Mr. Donaghey for “Good reason” both of which terms are defined in the agreement. The agreement may also be terminated, without Cause or Good Reason, by either party upon sixty days’ written notice to the other.
The agreement calls for (i) a cash salary of $400,000 per annum, payable monthly, and eligibility for a discretionary bonus within 60 days of the end of each year, and (ii) incentive stock options to purchase up to 1,000,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.78 per share under the company’s 2018 Incentive Stock Plan. These options vest in installments based upon achievement by the company of target amounts of “gross revenue” (as defined under US GAAP) during any one fiscal-year period (each, an “Annual Revenue Target”) as follows: with respect to 170,000 shares, upon achievement of an Annual Revenue Target of $10 million; with respect to an additional 330,000 shares, upon achievement of an Annual Revenue Target of $25 million; and with respect to the remaining 500,000 shares, upon achievement of an Annual Revenue Target of $50 million. The installments shall be cumulative. (I.e., the options may be exercised, as to any or all shares covered by an installment, at any time or times after an installment becomes exercisable and until expiration or termination of the options, and achievement of more than one Annual Revenue Target in any one fiscal-year period will cause the options to vest as to shares covered by both such installment amounts.).
In the event of a termination of the agreement by Mr. Donaghey with Good Reason, or by us without cause, we must pay him any unpaid base compensation due as of the termination date as well as any pro rata unpaid bonus and any unpaid expenses plus additional severance of 90 days’ base salary.
The company and Mr. Donaghey entered into an Executive Employment Agreement in August 2022 pursuant to which he served as Chief Financial and Chief Operating Officer until his appointment as President and CEO. The agreement provided for a salary of $350,000 per year, plus standard benefits as well as options to purchase up to 1,000,000 shares of its common stock under its 2018 Incentive Stock Plan, which vest over four years from the date of grant and have an exercise price of $2.36 per share, and Restricted Stock Units representing up to 400,000 shares of the company’s common stock which also vest over the same four-year period. The Restricted Stock Units were issued pursuant to a Restricted Stock Unit Agreement. Mr. Donaghey forfeited unvested options to purchase up to 950,000 shares of common stock which he had previously received for service on the company’s Board of Advisors.
As of April 18, 2019, we entered into an Executive Employment Agreement with Dr. Gregory J. Quarles setting forth the terms of his service as Chief Executive Officer. The agreement called for (i) a cash salary of $250,000 per annum, payable monthly, and eligibility for a discretionary bonus within 60 days of the end of each year, and (ii) options to purchase up to 5,000,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.35 per share. These options were issued pursuant to a grant agreement, dated as of April 18, 2019 and vest immediately with respect to 500,000 shares and in semi-annual installments with respect to the remaining 4,500,000 shares. The agreement also provided for Quarles to retain 2,000,000 options previously granted to him under a Consultant Stock Option Agreement in 2017, for his services on the Scientific Advisory Board, which are subject to vesting based on achievement of performance milestones. Dr. Quarles forfeited options to purchase an additional 1,500,000 shares under another prior option agreement. Dr. Quarles also received health and life insurance and other standard benefits under the agreement and reimbursement of certain out-of-pocket expenses. This agreement was amended December 15, 2020, increasing Dr. Quarles’ salary to $300,000 per year effective January 1, 2021, on November 30, 2021, increasing his salary to $350,000 per year effective January 1, 2022, and again, on November 29, 2022, increasing his salary to $400,000 per year effective November 1, 2022.
Effective November 25, 2024, the Board of Directors accepted the resignation of Dr. Quarles as President and Chief Executive Officer and entered into an Employment and Transition Agreement with Dr. Quarles pursuant to which he serves as CEO Emeritus. This agreement has an initial term of one year and may be extended by mutual agreement for an additional year. Under this agreement, he is to receive a salary at a monthly rate of $33,333 until March 1, 2025 and $29,167 thereafter, subject to certain performance criteria.
As of May 1, 2023, we entered into an Executive Employment Agreement with Dr. Stephen W. McCahon setting forth the terms of his service as Chief Science Officer. The agreement is for an initial term through December 31, 2025, and is renewable thereafter for sequential one-year periods unless terminated by either party. The agreement may be terminated by the company for “cause” or by McCahon for “Good Reason” both of which terms are defined in the agreement.
The agreement calls for a cash salary of $300,000 annualized for 2023, $325,000 for 2024 and $350,000 for 2025, plus standard benefits. Dr. McCahon’s salary is payable monthly. The agreement also requires the company to reimburse certain out-of-pocket expenses. In the event that we terminate the agreement for cause or he terminates without Good Reason, he will receive base compensation and expense reimbursement through the date of termination but will forfeit any unvested equity compensation.
Prior to entering into his Executive Employment Agreement described above, Dr. McCahon served as our Chief Scientist, pursuant to a Consulting Agreement, dated as of May 24, 2019 (the “SWM Consulting Agreement”), by and between the company and SWM Consulting LLC, of which he is the principal. The SMW Consulting Agreement provided for a combination of cash and equity compensation. The SWM Consulting Agreement provided for cash compensation of $180,000 for the first year and $250,000 during each of the second and third years of the term. Under the SWM Consulting Agreement, the company also repurchased 5,000,000 shares if its common stock, issued to Dr. McCahon in 2016 under a prior Consulting Agreement, at a price of $0.06 per share based on the company share price at the time of the SWM Consulting Agreement. 5,000,000 of an additional 15,000,000 shares held by Dr. McCahon are subject to a lock-up and released pro rata each month during the term of the agreement which may be accelerated in the event of termination other than for cause or a change in control. Effective May 23, 2022, the company and Dr. McCahon agreed to an extension of the SWM Consulting Agreement upon the same general terms and conditions. On January 17, 2023, the company amended the SWM Consulting Agreement. The amendment was effective as of January 1, 2023, provided for an extended term of three years, commencing on that date, and increased compensation under the agreement to $300,000, $325,000 and $350,000 per year for the first, second and third years of the extended term, respectively. The Consulting Agreement terminated upon execution of Dr. McCahon’s Executive Employment Agreement described above. Thus Dr. McCahon’s current compensation under his Executive Employment Agreement is commensurate with what he was to receive under the SMW Consulting Agreement.
Effective May 24, 2019, and in connection with the entry into the SWM Consulting Agreement, the company entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement with Applied Optical Sciences, Inc. (“AOS”), an Arizona corporation of which Stephen W. McCahon is the majority stockholder. The Asset Purchase Agreement provided for purchase of specified assets from AOS, including principally intellectual property, contracts and equipment in exchange for consideration consisting of (i) cash in the amount of $2,500,000.00, payable in the form of a Promissory Note, secured by the assets, and (ii) warrants to purchase up to 2,500,000 shares of Applied Energetics’ common stock at an exercise price of $0.06 per share. The Promissory Note was initially payable in six-month installments, with the first payment being due on the first anniversary of the note but was amended in February 2021 to extend the maturity date by six months and restructure the payment to time up to the adjusted maturity date. The amendment also called for waiver of any late payment penalties for the first two payments. The company made the first three payments of $500,000 each on February 10, 2021, May 24, 2021, and November 19, 2021, respectively. Effective May 23, 2022, the parties further amended the Promissory Note to extend the maturity date by an additional six months and to further restructure the remaining payments due thereunder to be monthly at $100,000 each with the final such payment being due on April 24, 2023. Accordingly, the company paid the Promissory Note in full in April 2023.
Dr. McCahon is a significant stockholder of the company. See “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.”
Effective January 1, 2022, the company and Mary P. O’Hara entered into an Executive Employment Agreement, pursuant to which she is currently serving as General Counsel and Chief Legal Officer for an initial term of three years, with automatic renewal for additional one-year periods thereafter unless either party terminates the agreement. The agreement calls for salary of $250,000 per year, plus standard benefits and eligibility for a bonus at the discretion of the board. The company has also granted Ms. O’Hara incentive stock options to purchase up to 640,000 shares of its common stock under its 2018 Incentive Stock Plan, which vest over four years, at an exercise price of $2.40 per share.
Grants of Plan-Based Awards
The following table sets forth certain information with respect to all plan-based awards granted to our named executive officers during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024.
Type of
Award Grant
Date All
Other Stock
Awards:
Number of
Shares of
Stock or
Units (#) All Other
Option
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Options (#) Exercise
or Base
Price of
Option
Awards
($/sh) Grant Date
Fair Value
of Stock and
Option
Awards
($) (1)
Bradford T. Adamczyk - - - - - -
Gregory J. Quarles - - - - - -
Christopher Donaghey(2) Stock Option 11/26/2024
1,000,000 $ 0.78 $ 0.67
Mary P. O’Hara - - - - - -
Stephen W. McCahon - - - - - -
(1) Based on Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing model and assumptions therein, including implied volatility of the underlying common stock.
Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End
The following table discloses unexercised options held by the named executives at December 31, 2024:
Option Awards
Name Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised Options
Exercisable
(#) Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
Unexercisable Option
Exercise
Price Option
Expiration
Date
Bradford T. Adamczyk 4,900,000 - $ 0.07 11/12/2028
Gregory J. Quarles(1) 4,920,500 - $ 0.35 4/18/2029
Christopher Donaghey(2) 150,000
$ 0.35 4/29/2029
200,000 - $ 0.61 5/12/2031
500,000 500,000 $ 2.36 7/13/2032
1,000,000 $ 0.78 11/26/2034
Mary P. O’Hara 360,000 - $ 1.27 8/20/2031
480,000 160,000 $ 2.40 1/1/2032
Stephen W. McCahon - - - -
(1) Dr. Quarles also holds Restricted Stock Units covering 1,954,545 shares of the company’s common stock which are subject to time and milestone vesting and terminate in November 2032.
(2) Mr. Donaghey also holds Restricted Stock Units covering 200,000 shares of the company’s common stock which are subject to time vesting.
In addition to the foregoing, as of December 31, 2024, Jonathan Barcklow, a director until April 1, 2024, held options to purchase up to 5,000,000 shares of common stock, and John Schultz, also a director, held options to purchase up to 2,500,000 shares of common stock, each at an exercise price of $0.07 per share and both of which expire on November 12, 2028. Details regarding these options are set forth in Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters below.
Payments upon Termination or Change-In-Control
There are no termination or change in control agreements in place that would require payments
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION:
During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024, none of our executive officers served on the Board of Directors or the Compensation Committee of any other company whose executive officers also serve on our Board of Directors or our Compensation Committee.

---

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS:
The following table sets forth information regarding the beneficial ownership of our Common Stock, based on information provided by the persons named below in publicly available filings, as of March 25, 2025:
● each of our directors and executive officers;
● all directors and executive officers of ours as a group; and
● each person who is known by us to beneficially own more than five percent of the outstanding shares of our Common Stock
Unless otherwise indicated, the address of each beneficial owner is in care of Applied Energetics, 9070 South Rita Road, Suite 1500, Tucson, Arizona 85747. Unless otherwise indicated, the company believes that all persons named in the following table have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of common stock that they beneficially own.
For purposes of this table, a person is deemed to be the beneficial owner of the securities if that person has the right to acquire such securities within 60 days of March 25, 2025, upon the exercise of options or warrants. In determining the percentage ownership of the persons in the table below, we assumed in each case that the person exercised all options which are currently held by that person and which are exercisable within such 60-day period, but that options and warrants held by all other persons were not exercised, and based the percentage ownership on 218,242,805 shares outstanding on March 25, 2025.
Name of Beneficial Owner Number of
Shares
Beneficially
Owned (1) Percentage
of Shares
Beneficially
Owned (1)
Bradford T. Adamczyk 7,135,081 (2) 3.2 %
Gregory J. Quarles 6,864,545 (3) 3.1 %
Jonathan R. Barcklow(4) 6,000,000 (4) 2.7 %
John E. Schultz Jr. 4,320,000 (5) 2.0 %
Stephen W. McCahon 14,257,861 (6) 6.6 %
Mary P. O’Hara 906,667 (7) *
Kevin T. McFadden 12,100,000 (8) 5.7 %
Christopher Donaghey 1,011,027 (9) *
Michael J. Alber 100,000 (10) --
All directors and executive officers as a group (7 persons) 40,187,713 17.2 %
* Less than one percent.
(1) Computed based upon the total number of shares of common stock, restricted shares of common stock and shares of common stock underlying options or warrants held by that person that are exercisable within 60 days of the Record Date.
(2) Based on information contained in a Form 4, filed with the SEC on June 17, 2024. Includes 1,563,599 shares held by Moriah Stone Global L.P., which is controlled by Mr. Adamczyk. Also includes 4,900,000 shares underlying options, 3,500,000 of which are held in the name of the Adamczyk Family 2021 LLC.
(3) Includes options to purchase up to 4,920,000 shares of common stock, which are fully vested, and Restricted Stock Units covering 1,954,545 shares of common stock, which are subject to vesting upon the occurrence of certain milestones.
(4) Includes 5,000,000 shares underlying options. On March 25, 2024, Mr. Barcklow tendered his resignation from the board, effective April 1, 2024.
(5) Based on information contained in a Form 4, filed with the SEC on May 30, 2023. Includes 500,000 shares held by Oak Tree Asset Management Ltd., which is controlled by Mr. Schultz, and 720,000 shares held by Mary Schultz, Mr. Schultz’s wife, in her IRA. Also includes 2,500,000 shares underlying options. 500,000 of Mr. Schultz’s shares are held in an IRA.
(6) Based on information contained in a Form 4 filed with the SEC on August 1, 2024. Includes 1,435,000 shares underlying warrants.
(7) Based on information contained in a Form 4, filed with the SEC on January 6, 2022. All such shares underlie options. Ms. O’Hara holds an additional 93,333 options which are subject to timed vesting.
(8) Based on information known by the company and Mr. McFadden’s Schedule 13G, filed with the SEC on September 29, 2020. Includes a warrant to purchase 125,000 shares of common stock. Mr. McFadden’s address is 21 Tow Path Lane South, Richmond, VA 23221.
(9) Based on information contained in a Form 4, filed with the SEC on December 5, 2024, and information known by the company. Does not include options to purchase an additional 1,750,000 shares of common stock and Restricted Stock Units covering 200,000 shares of common stock, all of which are subject to timed vesting.
(10) Shares are scheduled to vest on April 1, 2025. Does not include 150,000 shares underlying options all of which are subject to timed vesting.
Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans
The following table details information regarding our existing equity compensation plans as of December 31, 2024:
Equity Compensation Plan Information
Plan Category
Number of
securities
to be issued
upon
exercise of outstanding
options and
rights
Weighted-
average
exercise
price of
outstanding
options
Number of
securities
remaining
available for
future
issuance
under equity
compensation
plans
(excluding
securities
reflected in
column (a))
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders 24,695,434 $ 0.68 23,699,167
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders - - -
Total 24,695,434 $ 0.68 23,699,167
Effective November 12, 2018, the board of directors of Applied Energetics, Inc. adopted the 2018 Incentive Stock Plan. On October 30, 2019, the stockholders voted to approve and adopt the plan. The plan provides for the allocation and issuance of stock, restricted stock purchase offers and options (both incentive stock options and non-qualified stock options) to officers, directors, employees and consultants of the company. The board reserved a total of 50,000,000 for possible issuance under the plan.

---

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS AND DIRECTOR INDPENDENCE
Transactions with Related Parties
Except as disclosed herein, no director, executive officer, stockholder holding at least 5% of shares of our common stock, or any family member thereof, had any material interest, direct or indirect, in any transaction, or proposed transaction since the year ended December 31, 2024.
Contractual Relationships with Related Parties
Prior to entering into his Executive Employment Agreement to serve as our Chief Science Officer in May 2023, Dr. Stephen W. McCahon served as our Chief Scientist pursuant to a Consulting Agreement with SWM Consulting LLC of which he is the principal. For a description of this Consulting Agreement, see “Directors and Executive Officers - Agreements with Named Executives” above. See also, “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.” Dr. McCahon also holds in excess of 5% of our common stock.
On February 20, 2025, Applied Energetics made a $25,000 contribution to Silicon Valley Defense Group, a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization, where CEO Christopher Donaghey serves as an Executive Chairman of the Board of Directors. As its objective, SVDG “seeks to align and connect the people, capital, and ideas that will ensure allied democracies retain a durable techno-security advantage.”
Review, Approval or Ratification of Transactions with Related Persons
Pursuant to company policy, all officers and directors of the company who have, or whose immediate family members have, any direct or indirect financial or other participation in any business that supplies goods or services to Applied Energetics, are required to notify our Board of Directors, who will review the proposed transaction and take such action as it sees fit, including, if necessary, formal approval by the Board.
Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures
Consistent with the SEC requirements regarding auditor independence, our Board of Directors must pre-approve all audit and permissible non-audit services provided by our independent registered public accounting firm. Under the policy, the Board must approve non-audit services prior to the commencement of the specified service. Our independent registered public accounting firm, RBSM LLP, have verified to our Board that they have not performed, and will not perform any prohibited non-audit service.

---

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUTANT FEES AND SERVICES:
The following is a summary of the fees billed to the company by its independent registered Public Accounting firm for the years ended December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023.
Audit fees $ 68,500 $ 61,000
Audit related fees - -
All other fees 7,000 -
Tax fees 7,000 6,000
$ 82,500 $ 67,000
Fees for audit services include fees associated with the annual audit of the company and its subsidiaries, the review of our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q. Tax fees include tax compliance, tax advice, research and development credits and tax planning related to federal and state tax matters.
Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures
Consistent with the SEC requirements regarding auditor independence, our Board of Directors must pre-approve all audit and permissible non-audit services provided by our independent registered public accounting firm. Under the policy, the Board must approve non-audit services prior to the commencement of the specified service. Our independent registered public accounting firm, RBSM LLP, have verified to our Board that they have not performed, and will not perform any prohibited non-audit service.
PART IV

---

ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES:
The following documents are filed or incorporated by reference as part of this report:
(a) (1) The Consolidated Financial Statements of Applied Energetics, Inc. are filed as part of this report on page following the signatures.
Exhibits:
EXHIBIT NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
2.1
Amended and Restated Plan and Agreement of Merger entered into as of March 17, 2004, by and among U.S. Home & Garden, Inc. (“USHG”), Ionatron Acquisition Corp., a wholly-owned subsidiary of USHG, Robert Kassel (for purposes of Sections 5.9, 6.2(d), 6.2(j), 9.4 and 10.10 only), Fred Heiden (for purposes of Section 9.4 only), and Ionatron, Inc. and Robert Howard, Stephen W. McCahon, Thomas C. Dearmin and Joseph C. Hayden (incorporated by reference to the comparable exhibit filed with the Registrant’s Form 8-K filed with the SEC on March 24, 2004).
3.1
Certificate of Incorporation, as amended, (incorporated by reference to the comparable exhibit filed with the Registrant’s Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended June 30, 1995).
3.2
Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware on April 29, 2004 (incorporated by reference to the comparable exhibit filed with the Registrant’s Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2004).
3.3
Certificate of Elimination of the 10% Series A Convertible Preferred Stock of the Registrant (incorporated by reference to the comparable exhibit filed with the Registrant’s Form 8-K filed with the SEC on October 28, 2005).
3.4
Certificate of Designation of the 6.5% Series A Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock of the Registrant (incorporated by reference to the comparable exhibit filed with the Registrant’s Form 8-K filed with the SEC on October 28, 2005).
3.5
Certificate of Ownership and Merger of Applied Energetics, Inc. into Ionatron, Inc. (incorporated by reference to the comparable exhibit filed with the Registrant’s Form 8-K filed with the SEC on February 20, 2008).
3.6
Amended and Restated By-laws of the Registrant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3 of the Registrant’s Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2007.
3.7
Certificate of Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware on September 10, 2007.(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.7 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-231885)
4.1
Form of certificate evidencing Common Stock, $.001 par value, of the Registrant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-38483).
4.2
Description of Registrant’s Securities (incorporated by reference to the comparable exhibit filed with the Registrant’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2022)
10.1
2018 Incentive Stock Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018).
10.2
Consulting and Advisory Services Agreement, effective as of February 15, 2019, by and between the Registrant and WCC Ventures, LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99 to the Registrant’s Form 8-K filed with the SEC on February 22, 2019).
10.3
Advisory Board Agreement by and between Registrant and Christopher Donaghey (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-231885).
10.4
Executive Employment Agreement, dated as of April 18, 2019, by and between the Registrant and Gregory J. Quarles (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-231885).
10.5
Master Services Agreement, effective as of July 16, 2018, by and between the Registrant and Westpark Advisors, LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99 to the Registrant’s Form 8-K filed with the SEC on July 7, 2018), as amended by the First Amendment to Master Services Agreement, dated as of April 21, 2021 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Form 8-K filed with the SEC on April 27, 2021) and further amended by the Second Amendment to Master Services Agreement, dated January 17, 2023 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Form 8-K filed with the SEC on January 25, 2023).
10.6
Executive Employment Agreement, dated as of May 1, 2023, by and between the Registrant and Stephen W. McCahon (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 filed with the Registrant’s Form 8-K filed with the SEC on May 5, 2023)
10.7
Asset Purchase Agreement, by and between the Registrant and Applied Optical Sciences, Inc. LLC (incorporated by reference to comparable exhibit filed with the Registrant’s Form 8-K filed with the SEC on May 31, 2019)
10.9
Lease Agreement, by and between the Registrant and Campus Research Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 in the Registrant’s Form 8-K filed with the SEC on March 17, 2021.
10.10
Executive Employment Agreement, dated as of January 1, 2022, by and between the Registrant and Mary P. O’Hara (incorporated by reference to the comparable exhibit filed with the Registrant’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2022).
10.11
Executive Employment Agreement, dated as of July 13, 2022, by and between the Registrant and Christopher Donaghey (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Form 8-K filed with the SEC on July 18, 2022).
Insider Trading Policy (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 19.1 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 26, 2024)
Subsidiaries (incorporated by reference to the comparable exhibit filed with the Registrant’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006).
23.1
Consent of RBSM LLP
31.1
Certification of Chief Executive Officer (and Principal Financial Officer) pursuant to Rule 13a-14 or 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1
Certification of Chief Executive Officer (and Principal Financial Officer) pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
99.1
Compensation Committee Charter (incorporated by reference to the comparable exhibit filed with the Registrant’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010).
99.2
Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee Charter (incorporated by reference to the comparable exhibit filed with the Registrant’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009)
99.3
Audit Committee Charter (incorporated by reference to the comparable exhibit filed with the Registrant’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.
101.INS
Inline XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH
Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CAL
Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
101.DEF
Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
101.LAB
Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
101.PRE
Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
Cover Page Interactive Data File (formatted as Inline XBRL and contained in Exhibit 101)