EDGAR 10-K Filing

Company CIK: 1375205
Filing Year: 2021
Filename: 1375205_10-K_2021_0001654954-21-002132.json

---

ITEM 1. BUSINESS
Items 1 and 2. BUSINESS AND PROPERTIES
Overview and Corporate Structure
Incorporated on March 22, 2004, Ur-Energy is an exploration stage mining company, as that term is defined in Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) Industry Guide 7. We are engaged in uranium mining, recovery and processing activities, including the acquisition, exploration, development and operation of uranium mineral properties in the U.S. Through our Wyoming operating subsidiary, Lost Creek ISR, LLC, we began operation of our first in situ recovery uranium mine at our Lost Creek Project in 2013. Ur-Energy is a corporation continued under the Canada Business Corporations Act on August 8, 2006. Our Common Shares are listed on the NYSE American under the symbol “URG” and on the TSX under the symbol “URE.”
Ur-Energy has one direct wholly-owned subsidiary: Ur-Energy USA Inc. (“Ur-Energy USA”), a company incorporated under the laws of the State of Colorado. It has offices in Colorado and Wyoming and has employees in both states, in addition to having one employee based in Arizona.
Ur-Energy USA has three wholly-owned subsidiaries: NFU Wyoming, LLC (“NFU Wyoming”), a limited liability company formed under the laws of the State of Wyoming which acts as our land holding and exploration entity; Lost Creek ISR, LLC, a limited liability company formed under the laws of the State of Wyoming to hold and operate our Lost Creek Project and certain other of our Lost Creek properties and assets; and Pathfinder Mines Corporation (“Pathfinder”), a company incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware, which holds, among other assets, the Shirley Basin and Lucky Mc properties in Wyoming. Lost Creek ISR, LLC employs personnel at the Lost Creek Project.
Currently, and at December 31, 2020, our principal direct and indirect subsidiaries, and affiliated entities, and the jurisdictions in which they were incorporated or organized, are as follows:
We are engaged in uranium mining, recovery and processing operations, in addition to the exploration for and development of uranium mineral properties. Uranium fuels carbon-free, emission-free nuclear power which is a clean, cost-effective, and reliable form of electrical power. Nuclear power is estimated to provide more than 50 percent of the carbon-free electricity in the U.S. and approximately one-third of carbon-free electricity worldwide. As a uranium producer, we are allowed to advance the interests of clean energy, thereby addressing global climate change.
Our wholly owned Lost Creek Project in Sweetwater County, Wyoming is our flagship property. The project has been fully permitted and licensed since October 2012. We received operational approval from the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (“NRC”) and started production operation activities in August 2013. Our first sales of Lost Creek production were made in December 2013.
From commencement of operations until 2020, we had multiple term uranium sales agreements in place with U.S. utilities for the sale of Lost Creek production or other yellowcake product at contracted pricing. We sold 200,000 pounds of Uranium Oxide (“U3O8”) during 2020, at an average price of approximately $42 per pound. In more recent years, we took advantage of the low prices to enter into purchase agreements for delivery into our contractual commitments and, again for 2020, secured such purchase agreements for the 200,000 pounds of U3O8. The average cost of the 2020 purchases was $26 per pound. We completed all commitments into existing term agreements in 2020 Q2.
Our other material asset, Shirley Basin, is one of the assets we acquired as a part of the Pathfinder transaction in 2013. We also acquired all the historic geologic and engineering data for the project. During 2014, we completed a drill program of a limited number of confirmatory holes to complete an NI 43-101 mineral resource estimate which was released in August 2014; subsequently, an NI 43-101 Preliminary Economic Assessment for Shirley Basin was completed in January 2015. Baseline studies necessary for the permitting and licensing of the project commenced in 2014 and were completed in 2015.
In December 2015, our application for a permit to mine at Shirley Basin was submitted to the State of Wyoming Department of Environmental Quality (“WDEQ”). WDEQ has completed its technical review of our application for a permit to mine, and the State of Wyoming Uranium Recovery Program (“URP”) review of our application for source material license is also complete. We anticipate the state processes to be complete, with necessary permits and authorizations received, in 2021 H1. The BLM initiated its review of the Plan of Operations in 2019 and we received approval from the BLM in 2020. Work is well underway on initial engineering evaluations, designs and studies.
We utilize in situ recovery (“ISR”) of the uranium at Lost Creek and will do so at other projects where this is possible. The ISR technique is employed in uranium extraction because it allows for a lower cost and effective recovery of roll front mineralization. The in situ technique does not require the installation of tailings facilities or significant surface disturbance. This mining method utilizes injection wells to introduce a mining solution, called lixiviant, into the mineralized zone. The lixiviant is made of natural groundwater fortified with oxygen as an oxidizer, sodium bicarbonate as a complexing agent, and carbon dioxide for pH control. The complexing agent bonds with the uranium to form uranyl carbonate, which is highly soluble. The dissolved uranyl carbonate is then recovered through a series of production wells and piped to a processing plant where the uranyl carbonate is removed from the solution using Ion Exchange (“IX”) and captured on resin contained within the IX columns. The groundwater is re-fortified with the oxidizer and complexing agent and sent back to the wellfield to recover additional uranium. A low-volume bleed is permanently removed from the lixiviant flow. A reverse osmosis (“RO”) process is available to minimize the wastewater stream generated. Brine from the RO process, if used, and bleed are disposed of by means of injection into deep disposal wells. Each wellfield is made up of dozens of injection and production wells installed in patterns to optimize the areal sweep of fluid through the uranium deposit.
Our Lost Creek processing facility includes all circuits for the capture, concentration, drying and packaging of uranium yellowcake for delivery into sales. Our processing facility, in addition to the IX circuit, includes dual processing trains with separate elution, precipitation, filter press and drying circuits (this contrasts with certain other uranium in situ recovery facilities which operate as a capture plant only, and rely on agreements with other producers for the finishing, drying and packaging of their yellowcake end-product). Additionally, a restoration circuit including an RO unit was installed during initial construction to complete groundwater restoration once mining is complete. A pre-IX filtration and wastewater treatment facility is being contemplated and lab tested to further enhance the ion exchange effectiveness as well as reduce final wastewater volumes. The system, as currently planned, will allow for more effective use of current and future deep disposal wells working in conjunction with the Class V water recycling system.
The elution circuit (the first step after ion exchange) is utilized to transfer the uranium from the IX resin and concentrate it to the point where it is ready for the next phase of processing. The resulting rich eluate is an aqueous solution containing uranyl carbonate, salt and sodium carbonate and/or sodium bicarbonate. The precipitation circuit follows the elution circuit and removes the carbonate from the concentrated uranium solution and combines the uranium with peroxide to create a yellowcake crystal slurry. Filtration and washing is the next step, in which the slurry is loaded into a filter press where excess contaminants such as chloride are removed and a large portion of the water is removed. The final stage occurs when the dewatered slurry is moved to a yellowcake dryer, which will further reduce the moisture content, yielding the final dried, free-flowing, product. Refined, salable yellowcake is packaged in 55-gallon steel drums.
The restoration circuit may be utilized in the production as well as the post-mining phases of the operation. The RO is being utilized as a part of our Class V recycling circuit to minimize the wastewater stream generated during production. Once production is complete, the groundwater must be restored to its pre-mining class of use or better. The first step of restoration involves removing a small portion of the groundwater and disposing of it (commonly known as sweep). Following sweep, the groundwater is treated utilizing RO and re-injecting the clean water. Finally, the groundwater is homogenized and sampled to ensure the cleanup is complete, concluding the mining process.
Our Lost Creek processing facility was constructed in 2012 - 2013, with production operations commencing in August 2013. Our first sales were made in December 2013. Nameplate design and NRC-licensed capacity of our Lost Creek processing plant is two million pounds per year, of which approximately one million pounds per year may be produced from our wellfields. The Lost Creek plant and the allocation of resources to mine units and resource areas were designed to generate approximately one million pounds of production per year at certain flow rates and uranium concentrations subject to regulatory and license conditions. The excess capacity in the design of the processing circuits of the plant is intended, first, to facilitate routine (and, non-routine) maintenance on any particular circuit without hindering production operational schedules. The capacity was also designed to permit us to process uranium from other mineral projects in proximity to Lost Creek if circumstances warrant in the future (e.g., Shirley Basin Project) or, alternatively, to be able to contract to toll mill/process product from other in situ uranium mine sites in the region. The design permits us to conduct either of these activities while Lost Creek is producing and processing uranium and/or in years following Lost Creek production from wellfields during final restoration activities.
Our Lost Creek processing facility includes all circuits for the production, drying and packaging of uranium yellowcake for delivery into sales. As contemplated in the Preliminary Economic Assessment of Shirley Basin, we expect that the Lost Creek processing facility may be utilized for the drying and packaging of uranium from Shirley Basin, for which we currently anticipate the need only for a satellite plant. However, the Shirley Basin permit application contemplates the construction of a full processing facility, providing greater construction and operating flexibility as may be dictated by market conditions.
Our Mineral Properties
Our current land portfolio in Wyoming includes 12 projects. Ten of these projects are in the Great Divide Basin, Wyoming, including our flagship project, Lost Creek Project, which began production operations in August 2013. Currently we control nearly 1,800 unpatented mining claims and three State of Wyoming mineral leases for a total of approximately 36,000 acres (~15,500 hectares) at our Lost Creek Property, including the Lost Creek permit area (the “Lost Creek Project” or “Lost Creek”) and certain adjoining properties which we refer to as LC East, LC West, LC North, LC South and EN project areas (collectively, with the Lost Creek Project, the “Lost Creek Property”). Five of the projects at the Lost Creek Property contain NI 43-101 compliant mineral resources: Lost Creek, LC East, LC West, LC South and LC North. See Resource Summary below in Updated Preliminary Economic Assessment for Lost Creek Property. Below is a map showing our Wyoming projects and the geologic basins in which they are located.
Our Wyoming properties together total approximately 48,000 acres (approximately 19,425 hectares) and include two properties, Shirley Basin and Lucky Mc, obtained through our 2013 acquisition of Pathfinder Mines Corporation. Our Pathfinder acquisition also included a significant exploration and development database compiled by Pathfinder over several decades.
Our first gold exploration project (Excel Project) is located in west-central Nevada, and currently comprises 114 federal lode mining claims (approximately 2,600 acres). The project is located within the Excelsior Mountains, in proximity to the Camp Douglas and Candelaria Mining Districts. We identified the mineral potential of this project area from exploration data acquired through our purchase of Pathfinder. Historic exploration programs conducted by Pathfinder in the area of the Excel Project encountered high-grade gold and silver assays. Our initial land acquisition activities were complete in 2018, after which rock sampling and geochemical soil sampling programs were conducted. Since securing the land position, we have conducted additional work at the project on a time-to-time basis. Plans for the project for 2021 are not yet established.
Operating Properties
Lost Creek Project - Great Divide Basin, Wyoming
We acquired the Lost Creek Project area in 2005. Lost Creek is located in the Great Divide Basin (“GDB”), Wyoming. The Main Mineral Trend of the Lost Creek uranium deposit (the “MMT”) is located within the Lost Creek Project. The permit area of the Lost Creek Project covers 4,254 acres (1,722 hectares), comprising 201 lode mining claims and one State of Wyoming mineral lease section. Regional access relies almost exclusively on existing public roads and highways. The local and regional transportation network consists of primary, secondary, local and unimproved roads. Direct access to Lost Creek is mainly on two crown-and-ditched gravel paved access roads to the processing plant. One road enters from the west from Sweetwater County Road 23N (Wamsutter-Crooks Gap Road); the other enters from the east off of U.S. Bureau of Land Management (“BLM”) Sooner Road. On a wider basis, from population centers, the Lost Creek property area is served by an Interstate Highway (Interstate 80), a US Highway (US 287), Wyoming state routes (SR 220 and 73 to Bairoil), local county roads, and BLM roads. The Lost Creek Property is located as shown here:
The basic infrastructure (power, water, and transportation) necessary to support our ISR operation is located within reasonable proximity. Generally, the proximity of Lost Creek to paved roads is beneficial with respect to transportation of equipment, supplies, personnel and product to and from the property. Existing regional overhead electrical service is aligned in a north-to-south direction along the western boundary of the Lost Creek Project. An overhead power line, approximately two miles in length, was constructed to bring power from the existing Pacific Power line to the Lost Creek plant. Power drops have been made to the property and distributed to the plant, offices, wellfields, and other facilities. Additional power drops will be installed as we expand the wellfield operations.
There are no royalties at the Lost Creek Project, except the royalty on the State of Wyoming section mineral lease as provided by law. Currently, there is only limited production planned from the State lease section. There is a production royalty of one percent on certain claims of the LC East Project, and other royalties on other claims within the other adjoining projects (LC South and EN projects) as well as the other State sections on which we maintain mineral leases (LC West and EN projects).
Production Operations
Following receipt of the final regulatory authorization in October 2012, we commenced construction at Lost Creek. Construction included the plant facility and office building, installation of all process equipment, installation of two access roads, additional power lines and drop lines, deep disposal wells, construction of two holding ponds, warehouse building, and drill shed building. In August 2013 we were given operational approval by the NRC and commenced production operation activities. See also discussion of the operational methods used at Lost Creek, above, under heading “Business and Properties.”
For the Lost Creek PEA, in order to accurately reflect existing resources, all resources produced through September 30, 2015 (1,358,407 pounds) were subtracted from total Measured Resources from the HJ Horizon in Mine Unit 1 (“MU1”). All the wells to support the originally planned 13 header houses (“HHs”) have been completed. HHs 1-1 through 1-11 were operational as of the effective date of the Lost Creek PEA, October 15, 2015. Subsequently, the last two of the originally planned header houses in MU1 were brought online.
All monitor ring wells in Mine Unit 2 (“MU2”) have been installed, pump-tested and approved for operational use. As of October 15, 2015, the effective date for the Lost Creek PEA, 138 pattern wells were piloted within HHs 2-1, 2-2 and 2-3. In a limited development program in 2018, the wells previously piloted were completed for use and HHs 2-2 and 2-3 were constructed. HH 2-2 was brought into operation in August 2017, HH 2-3 started in January 2018 and HH 2-1 was brought online in May 2018. No further development work has been conducted at Lost Creek, since HH 2-1 came online.
We began 2020 with continued, controlled production at market appropriate reduced levels. In Q3, we further reduced production operations at Lost Creek. For the year, 10,789 pounds of U3O8 were captured within the Lost Creek plant and 15,873 pounds U3O8 were packaged in drums.
2016 Preliminary Economic Assessment for Lost Creek Property
In 2016, we issued a Preliminary Economic Assessment for the Lost Creek Property Sweetwater County Wyoming, as amended (February 8, 2016 (TREC, Inc.)) (the “Lost Creek PEA”). The Lost Creek PEA was prepared for the Company and its subsidiary, Lost Creek ISR, LLC, by Douglass H. Graves, P.E., TREC, Inc. (“TREC”) and James A. Bonner, P.Geo., in accordance with NI 43-101.
According to the Lost Creek PEA, the mineral resources at the Lost Creek Property at the date of the report were as follows:
Lost Creek Property - Resource Summary
MEASURED
INDICATED
INFERRED
PROJECT
AVG GRADE
SHORT TONS
POUNDS
AVG GRADE
SHORT TONS
POUNDS
AVG GRADE
SHORT TONS
POUNDS
% eU3O8
(X 1000)
(X 1000)
% eU3O8
(X 1000)
(X 1000)
% eU3O8
(X 1000)
(X 1000)
LOST CREEK
0.048
8,339
7,937
0.046
3,831
3,491
0.046
3,116
2,844
MU1 production through 9/30/15
(0.048
)
(1,415
)
(1,358
)
LC EAST
0.052
1,392
1,449
0.041
1,891
1,567
0.042
2,954
2,484
LC NORTH
-
-
-
-
-
-
0.045
LC SOUTH
-
-
-
0.037
0.039
LC WEST
-
-
-
-
-
-
0.109
EN
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
GRAND TOTAL
0.048
8,316
8,028
0.044
5,942
5,223
0.044
7,368
6,439
MEASURED + INDICATED =
14,258
13,251
Notes:
1.
Sum of Measured and Indicated tons and pounds may not add to the reported total due to rounding.
2.
% eU3O8 is a measure of gamma intensity from a decay product of uranium and is not a direct measurement of uranium. Numerous comparisons of eU3O8 and chemical assays of Lost Creek rock samples, as well as PFN logging, indicate that eU3O8 is a reasonable indicator of the chemical concentration of uranium.
3.
Table shows resources based on grade cutoff of 0.02 % eU3O8 and a grade x thickness cutoff of 0.20 GT.
4.
Measured, Indicated, and Inferred Mineral Resources as defined in Section 1.2 of NI 43-101 (the CIM Definition Standards (CIM Council, 2015)).
5.
Resources are reported through October 15, 2015.
6.
All reported resources occur below the static water table.
7.
1,358,407 lbs. of uranium have been produced from the HJ Horizon in MU1 (Lost Creek Project) as of September 30, 2015.
8.
Mineral resources that are not mineral reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability.
Information shown in the table above differs from the disclosure requirements of the SEC. See Cautionary Note to U.S. Investors Concerning Disclosure of Mineral Resources, above.
The Lost Creek PEA discloses changes for the Lost Creek Property which come in the form of an updated mineral resource estimate prompted by drilling within Lost Creek’s MU2, exploratory drilling at the Lost Creek and LC East Projects, and the re-estimation of all previously-identified resources for the Property at a revised 0.20 grade-thickness (GT) cut-off. The economic analyses within the Lost Creek PEA were revised to evaluate the impact of additional identified resources with information and data acquired through two years of ISR operations at Lost Creek. The Lost Creek PEA therefore replaced the last economic analyses for the Lost Creek Property (December 2013) and the NI 43-101 Technical Report on the Lost Creek Property, dated June 17, 2015 (the “2015 Technical Report”). The Lost Creek PEA covers production through September 30, 2015 and drilling and other exploration and operational activities conducted through October 15, 2015.
We published the 2015 Technical Report for the Lost Creek Property to report increased resources for its operating MU1 and from exploration drilling conducted early in 2015. In order to reconcile higher-than-expected uranium recoveries from production operations in this mine unit, various analyses were conducted. These analyses, including detailed remapping of mineralized trends within ten sand horizons and interpretation of data from an additional 85 closely-spaced wells and core-holes, resulted in the re-estimation of the mineral resources and the conclusion that it was most appropriate to lower the grade-thickness (“GT”) cut-offs from 0.30 to 0.20 within our GT contouring resource estimation technique. Employing these revised guidelines, resources for MU1 were re-mapped and re-evaluated, increasing the MU1 Measured Resources by 55% (after subtraction of MU1 production). Through the monitoring of continued production from MU1, the authors believe the 0.20 GT cutoff better represents the uranium resources for the Lost Creek Property and is supported by the economic analysis included in the PEA as well as the actual production achieved at the property to the cut-off date of the PEA. Accordingly, for the Lost Creek PEA, all resource estimations for Lost Creek Property have used the new 0.20 GT cutoff, again, following re-mapping and re-evaluation. Between the 2015 Technical Report and the Lost Creek PEA’s publication, our activities resulted in a cumulative increase of mineral resources at the Lost Creek Property of 31% in the Measured and Indicated categories and 28% in the Inferred category as was then reported in the Lost Creek PEA.
The Lost Creek Property includes six individual contiguous Projects: Lost Creek Project, LC East Project, LC West Project, LC North Project, LC South Project and EN Project. The fully-licensed and operating Lost Creek Project is considered the core project while the others are collectively referred to as the Adjoining Projects in the Lost Creek PEA. The Adjoining Projects were acquired by the Company as exploration targets to provide resources supplemental to those recognized at the Lost Creek Project. Most were initially viewed as stand-alone projects but expanded over time such that, collectively, they represent a contiguous block of land along with the Lost Creek Project.
The Lost Creek PEA mineral resource estimate includes drill data and analyses of approximately 3,200 historic and current holes and over 1.8 million feet of drilling at the Lost Creek Project alone. With the acquisition of the Lost Creek Project, we acquired logs and analyses from 569 historic holes representing 366,268 feet of data. Since our acquisition of the project, and until the October 15, 2015 drill data cut-off for the PEA, 2,629 holes and wells were drilled, including the construction and development drilling during 2013-2015 for MU1 and initial work in MU2 at Lost Creek. Additionally, drilling from the other five projects at the Lost Creek Property, both historic and our drill programs, is included in the mineral resource estimate. Collectively, this represents an additional 2,387 drill holes (1,306,331 feet).
The Lost Creek PEA is the first technical report prepared since production began at Lost Creek which includes an updated preliminary economic assessment. It reflects production from August 3, 2013 to September 30, 2015 and subtracts that amount (1,358,407 pounds) when summing the Measured Resources.
Based upon the Lost Creek PEA, since September 30, 2015 up through December 31, 2020, another 1,376,022 pounds U3O8 have been produced. Total production from MU1 and MU2, through December 31, 2020, equaled 2,734,393 pounds U3O8 and the remaining Lost Creek PEA resources following that production are as follows:
12/31/20 Reconciliation of Lost Creek Property Resource Estimate
MEASURED
INDICATED
INFERRED
PROJECT
AVG GRADE
SHORT TONS
POUNDS
AVG GRADE
SHORT TONS
POUNDS
AVG GRADE
SHORT TONS
POUNDS
% eU3O8
(X 1000)
(X 1000)
% eU3O8
(X 1000)
(X 1000)
% eU3O8
(X 1000)
(X 1000)
LOST CREEK
0.048
8,339
7,937
0.046
3,831
3,491
0.046
3,116
2,844
LC production through 12/31/20
-0.048
-2,834
-2,734
Lost Creek Subtotal at 12/31/20
0.048
5,505
5,203
0.046
3,831
3,491
0.046
3,116
2,844
LC EAST
0.052
1,392
1,449
0.041
1,891
1,567
0.042
2,954
2,484
LC NORTH
-
-
-
-
-
-
0.045
LC SOUTH
-
-
-
0.037
0.039
LC WEST
-
-
-
-
-
-
0.109
EN
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Grand Total at 12/31/20
0.048
6,897
6,652
0.044
5,943
5,223
0.044
7,368
6,440
MEASURED + INDICATED =
0.046
12,840
11,875
Since the date of the Lost Creek PEA, no additional exploration drilling has been conducted on the Lost Creek Property. As expected, development drilling for the initial MU2 construction at Lost Creek in 2017 did not result in the identification of significant additional mineral resources and no additional drilling has been conducted since that time. Absent a significant change in the uranium markets to warrant further development, no additional exploration or development drilling is now planned at the Lost Creek Property for 2021. If a ramp-up in production operations is warranted, development and construction will be a priority, with exploration activities to follow when appropriate.
Regulatory Authorizations and Land Title of Lost Creek
Beginning in 2007, we completed all necessary applications and related processes to obtain the required permitting and licenses for the Lost Creek Project, of which the three most significant are: a Source and Byproduct Materials License from the NRC (received August 2011); a Plan of Operations with the BLM (Record of Decision (“ROD”)) received October 2012; and a Permit and License to Mine from the WDEQ (October 2011). The WDEQ Permit includes the approval of the first mine unit, as well as the Wildlife Management Plan, including a positive determination of the protective measures at the project for the greater sage-grouse species.
Potential risks to the accessibility of the estimated mineral resource may include changes in the designation of the sage grouse as an endangered species by the USFWS because the Lost Creek Property lies within a sage grouse core area as defined by the state of Wyoming. In 2015, the USFWS issued its finding that the greater sage grouse does not warrant protection under the Endangered Species Act (ESA). The USFWS reached this determination after evaluating the species’ population status, along with the collective efforts by the BLM and U.S. Forest Service, state agencies, private landowners and other partners to conserve its habitat.
After a thorough analysis of the best available scientific information and considering ongoing key conservation efforts and their projected benefits, the USFWS determined the species does not face the risk of extinction now or in the foreseeable future and therefore does not need protection under the ESA. Should future decisions vary, or state or federal agencies alter their management of the species, there could potentially be an impact on future expansion operations. However, the Company continues to work closely with the Wyoming Game and Fish Department (“WGFD”) and the BLM to mitigate impacts to the sage grouse.
The State of Wyoming has developed a “core-area strategy” to help protect the greater sage-grouse species within certain core areas of the state. The Lost Creek property is within a designated core area and is thus subject to work activity restrictions from March 1 to July 15 of each year. The timing restriction precludes exploration drilling and other non-operational based activities which may disturb the sage-grouse. The sage-grouse timing restrictions relevant to ISR production and operational activities at the Lost Creek Project are somewhat different because the State has recognized that mining projects within core areas must be allowed to operate year-round. As a result, there are no timing restrictions on operational activities in pre-approved disturbed areas within our permit to mine.
Meanwhile, in related regulatory processes, the BLM prepared and issued environmental impact statements for and issued amendments to eleven Resource Management Plans (“RMPs”), related to the greater sage-grouse, which have subsequently been amended from time to time. In 2017, the BLM cancelled the land withdrawal program. Aspects of the RMPs have been or are being litigated, including the land withdrawal decision which has recently been remanded by the courts to the BLM for further consideration and NEPA review.
Additional authorizations from federal, state and local agencies for the Lost Creek project include: WDEQ-Air Quality Division Air Quality Permit and WDEQ-Water Quality Division Class I Underground Injection Control (“UIC”) Permit. Following the plugging of one of our deep disposal wells in 2019, the UIC permit allows Lost Creek to operate up to four Class I injection wells to meet the anticipated disposal requirements for the life of the Lost Creek Project. The Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) issued an aquifer exemption for the Lost Creek project. The WDEQ’s separate approval of the aquifer reclassification is a part of the WDEQ Permit. We also received approval from the EPA and the Wyoming State Engineer’s Office for the construction and operation of two holding ponds at Lost Creek.
In 2014, applications for amendments to the primary authorizations to mine at Lost Creek were submitted to federal regulatory agencies, NRC and BLM, for the development and mining of the LC East Project. In 2015, the BLM issued a notice of intent to complete an environmental impact statement for the application. The NRC participated in this review as a cooperating agency. The BLM published a Final Environmental Impact Statement (“FEIS”) on the amendment application in January 2019 and, in February 2019, a related ROD authorizing the plan. A permit amendment requesting approval to mine at the LC East Project was also submitted to the WDEQ. Approval will include an aquifer exemption. The air quality permit for Lost Creek will be revised to account for additional surface disturbance. Certain of our earlier Sweetwater County approvals will be amended. Numerous well permits from the State Engineer’s Office will be required. It is anticipated that all remaining permits and authorizations will be completed in 2021. See also Lost Creek Regulatory Proceedings, in Management Discussion and Analysis, below.
During 2016, we received all authorizations for the operation of Underground Injection Control (UIC) Class V wells at Lost Creek, and operation of the circuit began in early 2017. This allows for the onsite reinjection of fresh permeate (i.e., clean water) into relatively shallow Class V wells. Site operators use the RO circuits, which were installed during initial construction of the plant, to treat process wastewater into brine and permeate streams. The brine stream continues to be disposed of in the UIC Class I deep wells while the clean, permeate stream is injected into the UIC Class V wells after treatment for radium. These operational procedures continue to significantly enhance wastewater capacity at the site, ultimately reducing the injection requirements of our Class I deep disposal wells and extending the life of those valuable assets.
In September 2018, Wyoming assumed responsibility from the NRC for the regulation of radiation safety at uranium recovery facilities like Lost Creek. The Wyoming State Uranium Recovery Program (“URP”), a part of the WDEQ, oversees the licensing process for source material licenses as well as the operations of licensees in Wyoming. The URP has demonstrated that its integration into the overall WDEQ oversight of uranium recovery streamlines the process of licensing, offer greater consistency in authorizations and oversight, and results in reduced costs in the licensing phase. We anticipate that the URP will issue our Source Material License for LC East in 2021.
Through certain of our subsidiaries, we control the federal unpatented lode mining claims and State of Wyoming mineral leases which make up the Lost Creek Property. Title to the mining claims is subject to rights of pedis possessio against all third-party claimants as long as the claims are maintained. The mining claims do not have an expiration date. Affidavits have been timely filed with the BLM and recorded with the Sweetwater County Recorder attesting to the payment for the Lost Creek Property mining claims of annual maintenance fees to the BLM as established by law from time to time. The state leases have a ten-year term, subject to renewal for successive ten-year terms.
The surface of all the mining claims is controlled by the BLM, and we have the right to use as much of the surface as is necessary for exploration and mining of the claims, subject to compliance with all federal, state and local laws and regulations. Surface use on BLM lands is administered under federal regulations. Similarly, access to state-controlled land is largely inherent within a State of Wyoming mineral lease. The state lease at the Lost Creek Project requires a nominal surface impact fee to be paid. The other state mineral leases currently do not have surface impact payment obligations.
Exploration and Development Properties
Together with the Lost Creek Project, Five Adjoining Projects Form the Lost Creek Property
The LC East and LC West Projects (currently, approximately 5,710 acres (2,310 hectares) and 3,840 acres (1,554 hectares), respectively) were added to the Lost Creek Property in 2012. In 2012, all baseline studies at LC East were initiated. As discussed above, in 2014, we submitted applications for amendments of the Lost Creek licenses and permits to include development of LC East. We also located additional lode mining claims to secure the lands in what will be the LC East permit area. The East Mineral Trend (the “EMT”) is a second mineral trend of significance, in addition to the MMT at Lost Creek, identified by historic drilling on the lands forming LC East. Although geologically similar, it appears to be a separate and independent trend from the MMT. The Lost Creek PEA contains a recommendation that delineation drilling of identified resources in the EMT continue, together with progressing all necessary permit and license amendments to permit future production.
The LC North Project (approximately 6,200 acres (2,500 hectares)) is located to the north and to the west of the Lost Creek Project. Historical wide-spaced exploration drilling on this project consisted of 175 drill holes. We have conducted two drilling programs at the project. We may conduct exploration drilling at LC North in the future to pursue the potential of an extension of the MMT in the HJ and KM horizons.
The LC South Project (approximately 10,125 acres (4,100 hectares)) is located to the south and southeast of the Lost Creek Project. Historical drilling on the LC South Project consisted of 488 drill holes. In 2010, we drilled 159 exploration holes (total, 101,270 feet (30,867 meters)) which confirmed numerous individual roll front systems occurring within several stratigraphic horizons correlative to mineralized horizons in the Lost Creek Project. Also, a series of wide-spaced drill holes were part of this exploration program which identified deep oxidation (alteration) that represents the potential for several additional roll front horizons. In the future, we may conduct additional drilling to further evaluate the potential of deeper mineralization.
The EN Project (approximately 5,475 acres (2,200 hectares)) is adjacent to and east of LC South. We have over 50 historical drill logs from the EN project. Some minimal, deep, exploration drilling has been conducted at the project. Although no mineral resource is yet reported due to the limited nature of the data, we may in the future explore this area further with wide-spaced framework drilling to assess regional alteration and stratigraphic relationships. In an effort to contain costs, in recent years we have reduced the number of federal mining claims and state mineral leases held at the EN project.
History and Geology of the Lost Creek Property
Uranium was discovered in the Great Divide Basin, where Lost Creek is located, in 1936. Exploration activity increased in Wyoming in the early 1950s after the Gas Hills District discoveries, and continued to increase in the 1960s, with the discovery of numerous additional occurrences of uranium. Wolf Land and Exploration (which later became Inexco), Climax (Amax) and Conoco Minerals were the earliest operators in the Lost Creek area and made the initial discoveries of low-grade uranium mineralization in 1968. Kerr-McGee, Humble Oil, and Valley Development, Inc. were also active in the area. Drilling within the current Lost Creek Project area from 1966 to 1976 consisted of approximately 115 wide-spaced exploration holes by several companies including Conoco, Climax (Amax), and Inexco.
Texasgulf acquired the western half of what is now the Lost Creek Project in 1976 through a joint venture with Climax and identified what is now referred to as the Main Mineral Trend (MMT). In 1978, Texasgulf optioned into a 50% interest in the adjoining Conoco ground to the east and continued drilling, fully identifying the MMT eastward to the current Project boundary; Texasgulf drilled approximately 412 exploration holes within what is now the Lost Creek Project. During this period Minerals Exploration Company (a subsidiary of Union Oil Company of California) drilled approximately eight exploration holes in what is currently the western portion of the Lost Creek Project. Texasgulf dropped the project in 1983 due to declining market conditions. The ground was subsequently picked up by Cherokee Exploration, Inc. which conducted no field activities.
In 1987, Power Nuclear Corporation (also known as PNC Exploration) acquired 100% interest in the project from Cherokee Exploration, Inc. PNC Exploration conducted a limited exploration program and geologic investigation, as well as an evaluation of previous in situ leach testing by Texasgulf. PNC Exploration drilled a total of 36 holes within the current Project area.
In 2000, New Frontiers Uranium, LLC acquired the property and database from PNC Exploration, but conducted no drilling or geologic studies. New Frontiers Uranium, LLC later transferred the Lost Creek Project-area property along with its other Wyoming properties to its successor NFU Wyoming, LLC. In June 2005, Ur-Energy USA purchased 100% ownership of NFU Wyoming, LLC.
The Lost Creek Property is situated in the northeastern part of the GDB which is underlain by up to 25,000 ft. of Paleozoic to Quaternary sediments. The GDB lies within a unique divergence of the Continental Divide and is bounded by structural uplifts or fault displaced Precambrian rocks, resulting in internal drainage and an independent hydrogeologic system. The surficial geology in the GDB is dominated by the Battle Spring Formation of Eocene age. The dominant lithology in the Battle Spring Formation is coarse arkosic sandstone, interbedded with intermittent mudstone, claystone and siltstone. Deposition occurred as alluvial-fluvial fan deposits within a south-southwest flowing paleodrainage. The sedimentary source is considered to be the Granite Mountains, approximately 30 miles to the north. Maximum thickness of the Battle Spring Formation sediments within the GDB is 6,000 ft.
Uranium deposits in the GDB are found principally in the Battle Spring Formation, which hosts the Lost Creek Project deposit. Lithology within the Lost Creek deposit consists of approximately 60% to 80% poorly consolidated, medium to coarse arkosic sands up to 50 ft. thick, and 20% to 40% interbedded mudstone, siltstone, claystone and fine sandstone, each generally less than 25 ft. thick. This lithological assemblage remains consistent throughout the entire vertical section of interest in the Battle Spring Formation.
Outcrop at Lost Creek is exclusively that of the Battle Spring Formation. Due to the soft nature of the formation, the Battle Spring Formation occurs largely as sub-crop beneath the soil. The alluvial fan origin of the formation yields a complex stratigraphic regime which has been subdivided throughout Lost Creek into several thick horizons dominated by sands, with intervening named mudstones. Lost Creek is currently licensed and permitted to produce from the HJ horizon. The LC East permit and license amendments will include authorizations to recover uranium from the HJ and KM horizons.
We occasionally perform leach testing on various samples from the Lost Creek Project. Most recently, in 2010, we performed leach testing on samples from the KM Horizon of the Lost Creek Project. Seven samples obtained from one-foot sections of core were tested for mineral recovery using the same test methods as in prior tests from the HJ Horizon (currently licensed for production at Lost Creek, and being recovered in MU1). Twenty-five pore volumes of various bicarbonate leach solutions were passed through the samples. Uranium recovery ranged from 54.1 to 93.0% with an average uranium recovery of 80.6%. These results are similar to earlier leaching and recovery tests conducted on behalf of the Company on samples from the HJ Horizon, which returned results consistently averaging 82 - 83%. We believe these results are consistent with industry experience.
Pathfinder Mines Corporation: Shirley Basin Mine Site (Shirley Basin, Wyoming) and Lucky Mc Mine Site (Gas Hills Mine District, Wyoming)
As a result of the Pathfinder acquisition, we now own the Shirley Basin and Lucky Mc mine sites in the Shirley Basin and Gas Hills mining districts of Wyoming, respectively, from which Pathfinder and its predecessors historically produced more than seventy-one million pounds of uranium, primarily from the 1960s through the 1990s. Pathfinder’s predecessors included COGEMA, Lucky Mc Uranium Corporation, and Utah Construction/Utah International.
Both Lucky Mc and Shirley Basin conventional mine operations were suspended in the 1990s due to low uranium pricing, and facility reclamation was substantially completed. We assumed the remaining reclamation responsibilities, including financial surety for reclamation, at Shirley Basin and at the Lucky Mc mine site. The Lucky Mc tailings site was fully reclaimed and, at the time of our acquisition, was in the process of being transferred to the U.S. Department of Energy. Therefore, we assumed no obligations with respect to the Lucky Mc tailings site, which were retained by the seller upon closing, or the NRC license at the site.
Together with property holdings of patented lands, unpatented mining claims, and State of Wyoming and private leases totalling more than 5,500 acres (nearly 3,700 acres at Shirley Basin (~1,500 hectares); approximately 1,800 at Lucky Mc (~750 hectares)), we also acquired all historic geologic, engineering and operational data related to the two mine areas.
As with the Lost Creek mining claims, title to the mining claims at Shirley Basin and Luck Mc is subject to rights of pedis possessio against all third-party claimants as long as the claims are maintained. The mining claims do not have an expiration date. Affidavits have been timely filed with the BLM and recorded with the Carbon and Fremont County Recorders attesting to the payment for the mining claims of annual maintenance fees to the BLM as established by law from time to time. The surface of all the unpatented mining claims is controlled by the BLM, and we have the right to use as much of the surface as is necessary for exploration and mining of the claims, subject to compliance with all federal, state and local laws and regulations. Surface use on BLM lands is administered under federal regulations.
Our project in the Shirley Basin (the “Shirley Basin Project”) is in Carbon County, Wyoming, approximately 40 miles south of Casper, Wyoming. The project is accessed by travelling west from Casper, on Highway 220. After travelling 18 miles, turn south on Highway 487 and travel an additional 35 miles; the entrance to Shirley Basin Mine is to the east.
In addition to the two projects and related data, we acquired an extensive U.S. exploration and development database estimated to comprise hundreds of project descriptions in more than 20 states, including thousands of drill logs and geologic reports. Our geology staff continues with its evaluation of this database, assessing opportunities to monetize this additional asset.
The tailings facility at the Shirley Basin site is one of the few remaining facilities in the U.S. that is licensed by the NRC to receive and dispose of byproduct waste material from other in situ uranium mines. We assumed the operation of the byproduct disposal site in 2013 and have accepted deliveries since then under several existing contracts.
Preliminary Economic Assessment for Shirley Basin Uranium Project
In 2015, we issued a Preliminary Economic Assessment for the Shirley Basin Uranium Project Carbon County Wyoming, January 27, 2015 (the “Shirley Basin PEA”). The Shirley Basin PEA was prepared under the supervision of WWC Engineering. The current mineral resources at the Shirley Basin Project are estimated as follows:
Shirley Basin Uranium Project - Resource Summary
MEASURED
INDICATED
RESOURCE
AVG GRADE
SHORT TONS
POUNDS
AVG GRADE
SHORT TONS
POUNDS
AREA
% eU3O8
(X 1000)
(X 1000)
(X 1000)
(X 1000)
(X 1000)
FAB TREND
0.280
1,172
6,574
0.119
1,081
AREA 5
0.243
0.115
TOTAL
0.275
1,367
7,521
0.118
1,295
MEASURED + INDICATED =
0.230
1,915
8,816
Notes:
1.
Sum of Measured and Indicated tons and pounds may not add to the reported total due to rounding.
2.
Mineral resources that are not mineral reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability.
3.
Based on grade cutoff of 0.02 percent eU3O8 and a grade x thickness cutoff of 0.25 GT.
4.
Measured and Indicated Mineral Resources as defined in Section 1.2 of NI 43-101 (the CIM Definition Standards (CIM Council, 2015)).
5.
Resources are reported through July 2014.
6.
All reported resources occur below the historical, pre-mining static water table.
7.
Sandstone density is 16.0 cu. ft./ton.
Information shown in the table above differs from the disclosure requirements of the SEC. See Cautionary Note to U.S. Investors Concerning Disclosure of Mineral Resources, above.
The Shirley Basin mineral resource estimate includes drill data and analyses of approximately 3,200 holes and nearly 1.2 million feet of historic drilling at the Shirley Basin Project. We drilled 14 confirmation holes representing approximately 6,600 feet which were included in the mineral resource estimate. Because of the density of the historical drill programs, estimates were able to be made entirely in Measured and Indicated categories of resources and there is no Inferred Resource included in the resource estimate for Shirley Basin.
Shirley Basin History and Geology
The Shirley Basin property lies in the northern half of the historic Shirley Basin uranium mining district (the “District”), which is the second most prolific uranium mining district in Wyoming. Earliest discoveries were made in 1954 by Teton Exploration. This was followed by an extensive claim staking and drilling rush by several companies in 1957. Several important discoveries were made, and the first mining was started in 1959 by Utah Construction Corp. (predecessor to Pathfinder). Underground mining methods were initially employed but encountered severe groundwater removal problems, so in 1961 Utah Construction switched to solution mining methods. This was the first commercially successful application of in situ solution mining recovery (ISR) for uranium in the U.S. In 1968 market and production needs caused Utah Construction to move to open-pit mining and a conventional mill. All production within the district since that time has been by open-pit methods.
Several companies operated uranium mines within the District, however three companies were dominant. Utah Construction/Pathfinder’s efforts were focused in the northern portions of the District, while Getty was largely in the central portions, and Kerr-McGee was in the southern portions. In 1960, Getty and Kerr-McGee joined together as Petrotomics Company to build a mill for joint processing of their production. The last mining in the District concluded in 1992 when Pathfinder shut down production due to market conditions. Total production from Shirley Basin was 51.3 million pounds of uranium, of which 28.3 million pounds came from the Utah Construction/Pathfinder operations which we now own.
Resources which we are currently targeting for ISR production represent unmined extensions of mineral trends addressed in past open-pit mines. These extensions had been targeted for mining but were not developed prior to the closure of the mining operations in 1992.
The Shirley Basin mining district lies in the north-central portions of the Shirley Basin geologic province, which is one of several inter-montane basins in Wyoming created 35-70 million years ago (mya) during the Laramide mountain building event. The Basin is floored by folded sedimentary formations of Cretaceous age (35-145 mya). These units were tilted by Laramide tectonic forces and subsequently exposed to erosion, creating a “paleo-topographic” surface. In the northern half of the Basin the Cretaceous units were later covered by stream sediments of the Wind River Formation of Eocene age (34-56 mya) which filled paleo-drainages cut into a paleo-topographic surface. The source of the Wind River sediments is granitic terrain within the nearby Laramie Range to the east and the Shirley Mountains to the southwest. The Wind River Formation was subsequently covered by younger volcanic ash-choked stream sediments of the White River and Arikaree Formations of Oligocene age (23-34 mya) and Miocene age (5-23 mya), respectively.
The Wind River Formation is the host of all uranium mineralization mined within the Shirley Basin mining district. The lithology of the Wind River Formation is characterized by multiple thick, medium to coarse grained sandstones separated by thick claystone shale units. The individual sandstones and shales are typically 20 to 50 feet thick. Total thickness of the Wind River Formation ranges from approximately 400 to 500 feet. The two most dominant sandstones are named the Main and Lower Sands. The Lower Sand represents the basal sand unit of the Wind River Formation and in places lies directly above the underlying Cretaceous formations.
Uranium occurs as roll front type deposits along the edge of large regional alteration systems within sandstone units of the Wind River Formation. The source of the uranium is considered to be the volcanic ash content within the overlying White River Formation and also granitic content within the Wind River Formation itself. The Main and Lower Sands are the primary hosts to mineralization which we are currently targeting for ISR development. Studies we conducted in 2014, as well as previous studies by Pathfinder in the late 1990s including a pilot plant project, indicate that this mineralization is amenable to ISR extraction. The primary target is called the FAB Trend which represents the connecting mineral trend between two past-produced open-pits. A secondary target called Area 5 was also an ISR target for Pathfinder prior to shut-down of their mining operations in 1992.
Competition and Mineral Prices
The uranium industry is highly competitive, and our competition includes larger, more established companies with longer operating histories that not only explore for and produce uranium, but also market uranium and other products on a regional, national or worldwide basis. As described below, on a global basis, this competition also includes a significant number of state-owned or sponsored entities. Because of the greater financial and technical resources of these companies, competitive bid processes on off-take sales agreements remain difficult. Beyond that, in the U.S., the competitive bid process for other contracts and opportunities is and will be challenging; this competition extends to the further acquisition of properties and equipment, contractors and personnel required to explore and develop such properties. Additionally, these larger (or state-owned) companies have greater resources to continue with their operations during periods of depressed market conditions.
Unlike other commodities, uranium does not trade on an open market. Contracts are negotiated privately by buyers and sellers. Our original term agreements for sales of uranium have been completed. Uranium prices are published by two of the leading industry-recognized independent market consultants, UxC, LLC and TradeTech, LLC, who publish on their respective websites. The following information reflects an average of the per pound prices published by these two consulting groups for the end of the periods indicated:
End of year:
Spot price (US$)
$ 34.23
$ 20.25
$ 23.75
$ 27.75
$ 24.93
$ 30.20
LT price (US$)
$ 44.00
$ 30.00
$ 31.00
$ 32.00
$ 32.50
$ 35.00
End of month:
31-Aug-20
30-Sep-20
31-Oct-20
30-Nov-20
31-Dec-20
31-Jan-21
24-Feb-21
Spot price (US$)
$ 30.85
$ 29.93
$ 29.70
$ 29.68
$ 30.20
$ 29.63
$ 28.23
LT price (US$)
$ 35.00
$ 35.00
$ 35.00
$ 35.00
$ 35.00
$ 34.50
$ 34.25
The long-term price as defined by UxC, LLC includes conditions for escalation (from current quarter) delivery timeframe (≥ 24 months), and quantity flexibility (up to ±10%) considerations.
Strong competition in the uranium industry is also felt in the pursuit of qualified personnel and contractors, drill companies and equipment and other equipment and materials. As the industry is revitalized through changes in market pricing, establishment of the national uranium reserve or implementation of others of the recommendations made by the Working Group, this type of competition for expertise, staffing and equipment may become more serious.
Government Regulations
As set forth above, our operations at Lost Creek and our other projects in Wyoming where exploration, development and operations are taking place, are subject to extensive laws and regulations which are overseen and enforced by multiple federal, state and local authorities. This is true, as well, with our exploration fieldwork at our Excel Project in Nevada. These laws and regulations govern exploration, development, production, various taxes, labor standards, occupational health and safety including radiation safety, waste disposal, protection and remediation of the environment, protection of endangered and protected species, toxic and hazardous substances and other matters. Uranium minerals exploration is also subject to risks and liabilities associated with pollution of the environment and disposal of waste products occurring as a result of mineral exploration and production.
Compliance with these laws and regulations may impose substantial costs on us and subject us to significant potential liabilities. Changes in these regulations could require us to expend significant resources to comply with new laws or regulations or changes to current requirements and could have a material adverse effect on our business operations.
Minerals exploration and development activities, as well as our uranium recovery operations, are subject to comprehensive regulation which may cause substantial delays or require capital outlays in excess of those anticipated, causing an adverse effect on our business operations. Minerals exploration operations are also subject to federal and state laws and regulations which seek to maintain health and safety standards. Various permits from government bodies are required for drilling operations to be conducted; no assurance can be given that such permits will be received. Environmental standards imposed by federal and state authorities may be changed and any such changes may have material adverse effects on our activities. Minerals extraction operations are subject to federal and state laws relating to the protection of the environment, including laws regulating removal of natural resources from the ground and the discharge of materials into the environment. The posting of a performance bond and the costs associated with our permitting and licensing activities requires a substantial budget and ongoing cash commitments. In addition to pursuing ongoing permitting and licensure for new projects and additions to our existing Lost Creek Project, these expenditures include ongoing monitoring (e.g., wildlife, groundwater and effluent monitoring) and other activities to ensure compliance with law and our permits and licenses. We may be required to increase these costs and compliance activities in the future, which might further affect our ability to expand or maintain our operations.
Environmental Regulations
As set forth above, our mineral projects are the subject of extensive environmental regulation at federal, state and local levels. Exploration, development and production activities are subject to certain environmental regulations which may prevent or delay the commencement or continuance of our operations. The National Environmental Protection Act (“NEPA”) affects our operations as it requires federal agencies to consider the significant environmental consequences of their proposed programs and actions and inform the public about their decision making. The required process of NEPA may take many months or even years to complete. While the NEPA regulations were extensively revised and modernized in 2020 in generally positive and pragmatic ways, they are currently the subject of several litigation challenges.
In general, our exploration and production activities are subject to certain federal and state laws and regulations relating to environmental quality and pollution control. Such laws and regulations increase the costs of these activities substantially and may prevent or delay the commencement or continuance of a given operation. Compliance with these laws and regulations has not had a materially adverse or unreasonable effect on our operations or financial condition to date. Specifically, we are subject to legislation and regulations regarding radiation safety, emissions into the environment, water discharges, and storage and disposition of hazardous wastes. In addition, the law requires well and facility sites to be abandoned and reclaimed to the satisfaction of state and federal authorities.
State of Wyoming
As discussed elsewhere in this report, we are regulated by multiple divisions of the State of Wyoming Department of Environmental Quality (LQD, WQD, AQD and URP), the State Engineer’s Office and other State agencies. As a State program with delegated authority of the NRC, the URP will adopt future regulations and rulemakings of the NRC on a time-to-time basis. On December 16, 2019 staff of the NRC issued SECY-19-0123-Regulatory Options for Uranium In Situ Recovery Facilities which provided recommendations to the NRC Commissioners on how to regulate the in situ uranium mining industry. Upon review, the NRC Commissioners instructed staff to begin a narrowly focused rulemaking for in situ milling. NRC staff, in close consultation with agreement state programs, including Wyoming’s, are currently in the process of drafting a rule for public review and comment. Once promulgated, all agreement state programs which regulate uranium milling will be required to adopt the final rule. The timing of the final rule is unknown but is expected within the next one to two years. The rulemaking is to be narrow in scope and consistent with current practices and is therefore not expected to have a material effect on our operations.
Waste Disposal
The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act ("RCRA"), and comparable state statutes, affect minerals exploration and production activities by imposing regulations on the generation, transportation, treatment, storage, disposal and cleanup of hazardous wastes and on the disposal of non-hazardous wastes. Under the auspices of the United States Environmental Protection Agency (the "EPA"), the individual states administer some or all the provisions of RCRA, sometimes in conjunction with their own, more stringent requirements.
Underground Injection Control ("UIC") Permits
The federal Safe Drinking Water Act (“SDWA”) creates a nationwide regulatory program protecting groundwater. This act is administered by the EPA. However, to avoid the burden of dual federal and state regulation, the SDWA allows for the UIC permits issued by states to satisfy the UIC permit required under the SDWA under two conditions. First, the state's program must have been granted primacy, as is the case in Wyoming. Second, the EPA must have granted, upon request by the state, an aquifer exemption. The EPA may delay or decline to process the state's application if the EPA questions the state's jurisdiction over the mine site. From time to time, EPA has promulgated rulemaking processes to expand and/or clarify its jurisdiction and the rules under which the UIC and other programs operate; while no such rulemaking is currently in process, there may be additional such rulemakings at any time.
CERCLA
The federal Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act ("CERCLA") imposes joint and several liability for costs of investigation and remediation and for natural resource damages, without regard to fault or the legality of the original conduct, on certain classes of persons with respect to the release into the environment of substances designated under CERCLA as hazardous substances ("Hazardous Substances"). These classes of persons or potentially responsible parties include the current and certain past owners and operators of a facility or property where there is or has been a release or threat of release of a Hazardous Substance and persons who disposed of or arranged for the disposal of the Hazardous Substances found at such a facility. CERCLA also authorizes the EPA and, in some cases, third parties to take actions in response to threats to the public health or the environment and to seek to recover the costs of such action. We may also in the future become an owner of facilities on which Hazardous Substances have been released by previous owners or operators. We may in the future be responsible under CERCLA for all or part of the costs to clean up facilities or property at which such substances have been released, and for natural resource damages.
As is true of other regulatory schemes, EPA from time to time suggests changes in CERCLA. Such changes to existing CERLCA regulations may include amendments or additional regulations which will have an economic impact on our operations through increased costs of bonding and reclamation activities. There may be additional legislation or rulemaking related to CERCLA.
Air Emissions
Our operations are subject to state and federal regulations for the control of emissions of air pollution. Major sources of air pollutants are subject to more stringent, federally imposed permitting requirements. Administrative enforcement actions for failure to comply strictly with air pollution regulations or permits are generally resolved by payment of monetary fines and correction of any identified deficiencies. Alternatively, regulatory agencies could require us to forego construction, modification or operation of certain air emission sources.
Clean Water Act
The Clean Water Act ("CWA") imposes restrictions and strict controls regarding the discharge of wastes, including mineral processing wastes, into waters of the United States, a term broadly defined. Permits must be obtained to discharge pollutants into federal waters. The CWA provides for civil, criminal and administrative penalties for unauthorized discharges of hazardous substances and other pollutants. It imposes substantial potential liability for the costs of removal or remediation associated with discharges of oil or hazardous substances. State laws governing discharges to water also provide varying civil, criminal and administrative penalties, and impose liabilities in the case of a discharge of petroleum or its derivatives, or other hazardous substances, into state waters. In addition, the EPA and the State of Wyoming have promulgated regulations that require us to obtain permits to discharge storm water runoff. In the event of an unauthorized discharge of wastes, we may be liable for penalties and costs.
Employees
At December 31, 2020, Ur-Energy USA had 10 full-time employees, in its Littleton, Colorado office (five) and Wyoming offices (five). At that date, Lost Creek ISR, LLC employed eight people at the Lost Creek Project near Wamsutter, Wyoming. None of our other subsidiaries had employees in 2020. Ur-Energy Inc. had no employees during 2020.
The foregoing employment figures follow several reductions in force implemented in recent years. We have reduced our staff and management levels since 2016, due to reduced and controlled production operational levels at Lost Creek. As discussed elsewhere in this report, those reduced operations are due to persistently challenged uranium market conditions and the need to optimize operational costs. Through these several reductions in force, we have focused on retaining our most experienced staff with diverse skill sets who will be best able to maintain safe, compliant operations in the short term and assist us to ramp up to full production operations when conditions warrant.
Corporate Offices
The registered office of Ur-Energy is located at 55 Metcalfe Street, Suite 1300, Ottawa, Ontario K1P 6L5. Our United States corporate headquarters is located at 10758 West Centennial Road, Suite 200, Littleton, Colorado, 80127. We maintain a corporate and operations office at 907 North Poplar Street, Suite 150, Casper, Wyoming 82601. Lost Creek operational offices are located at 3424 Wamsutter / Crooks Gap Road, Wamsutter, Wyoming 82336.
Available Information
Detailed information about Ur-Energy is contained in our annual reports, quarterly reports, current reports on Form 8-K, and other reports, and amendments to those reports that we file with or furnish to the SEC and the Canadian regulatory authorities. These reports are available free of charge on our website, www.ur-energy.com, as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such reports with or furnish such reports to the SEC and the Canadian regulatory authorities. However, our website and any contents thereof should not be considered to be incorporated by reference into this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
We will furnish copies of such reports free of charge upon written request to our Corporate Secretary:
Ur-Energy Inc.
Attention: Corporate Secretary
10758 West Centennial Road, Suite 200
Littleton, Colorado 80127
Telephone: 1-866-981-4588
Email: legaldept@ur-energy.com
Additionally, our corporate governance guidelines, Code of Ethics and the charters of each of the standing committees of our Board of Directors (“Board”) are available on our website. We will furnish copies of such information free of charge upon written request to our Corporate Secretary, as set forth as above.
Other information relating to Ur-Energy may be found on the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov/edgar.shtml or on the SEDAR website at www.sedar.com. Our reports can be read and copied by the public at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549.

---

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
Item 1A. RISK FACTORS
An investment in our securities involves a high degree of risk. You should consider the following discussion of risks in addition to the other information in this annual report before purchasing any of our securities. In addition to historical information, the information in this annual report contains “forward-looking” statements about our future business and performance. Our actual operating results and financial performance may be very different from what we expect as of the date of this annual report. The risks below address material factors that may affect our future operating results and financial performance.
Risk Factors Related to the Uranium Markets and Nuclear Fuel Cycle Industries
Largely unrestricted imports challenge the U.S. domestic industry.
Notwithstanding numerous suspensions in production operations during 2020 related to the COVID-19 (Coronavirus) pandemic, and resulting higher uranium spot prices, the global uranium market continues to be characterized by production levels and costs of production in and for countries such as Russia, Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan which have had a substantial impact on the U.S. uranium production industry over the past several years. China is also aggressively expanding its role in the global uranium mining markets and in the rest of the nuclear fuel cycle. If the imports from government-subsidized production sites remain unchecked on a continuing basis, without other relief, there could be a significant continuing negative impact to the uranium market which could adversely impact the Company’s future profitability.
Our 2018 trade action, filed with a co-petitioner under Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962 with the U.S. Department of Commerce, was ultimately not successful in obtaining the suggested quotas on imports of uranium products to protect against the threat to U.S. national security presented by Kazakh, Russian and other uranium importers. The action did result in the establishment of the U.S. Nuclear Fuel Working Group (“Working Group”), tasked to conduct a fuller analysis of national security considerations with respect to the entire nuclear fuel supply chain and, specifically, to develop recommendations for reviving and expanding domestic uranium production. The Working Group report was released in April 2020 and made a series of recommendations to support the uranium production industry. Primary among the recommendations of the Working Group is the plan for a national uranium reserve and the revitalization of the existing uranium reserve. In December 2020, initial funding for the reserve, in amount of $75 million for FY2021, was approved by Congress, subject to the Department of Energy establishing plans for the reserve program.
In addition to the continuing uncertainty of the timing and outcome of the establishment of the reserve and/or other recommendations advanced by the Working Group, the Company’s efforts seeking relief for the industry may have unintended consequences that may affect our business relationships with industry and consumers of uranium. These consequences, together with the costs of continuing to pursue relief, may have adverse impacts on us.
Our term sales contracts for our production have expired. We may be unable to enter into new term sales contracts on suitable terms and conditions, and the spot market does not currently support full production operations at Lost Creek.
Our term sales contracts, which historically resulted in uranium sales at prices in excess of spot prices, have been completed. If market conditions do not improve, and the U.S. utilities do not move away from near-total reliance on imported product from Russia, Kazakhstan and other state-supported operations, we do not expect to execute sales agreements at favorable prices with U.S. utilities in the near future. The timing for the establishment of a new national uranium reserve program and bid process remains unknown. When the new national uranium reserve program will be established, and a bid process initiated, remains unknown. Whether we will be successful in obtaining contracts at pricing and delivery volumes that will sustain full production operations also remains unknown. The failure to enter into new term sales contracts on suitable terms, could adversely impact our operations and mining activity decisions, and resulting cash flows and income.
The uranium market is volatile and has limited customers.
The price of uranium is volatile and may experience significant price movements over short periods of time. Factors beyond our control affect the market, including demand for nuclear power; changes in public acceptance of nuclear power generation; political and economic conditions in uranium mining, producing and consuming countries; costs and availability of financing of nuclear plants; changes in governmental regulations; global or regional consumption patterns; speculative activities and increased production due to new extraction developments and improved production methods; the future viability and acceptance of small modular reactors or micro-reactors and the related fuel requirements for this new technology; reprocessing of spent fuel and the re-enrichment of depleted uranium tails or waste; and global economics, including currency exchange rates, interest rates and expectations of inflation. Any future accidents or terrorism at nuclear facilities are likely to also impact the conditions of uranium mining and the use and acceptance of nuclear energy. The effect of these factors on the price of uranium, and therefore on the economic viability of our properties, cannot accurately be predicted.
The uranium industry is highly competitive and is competitive with other energy sources.
The national and international uranium industry is highly competitive. Our activities are directed toward the exploration for, evaluation, acquisition and development of uranium deposits into production operations. There is no certainty that any expenditures to be made by us will result in discoveries of commercial quantities of uranium production. There is aggressive competition within the uranium mining industry for the discovery, acquisition and development of properties considered to have commercial potential. We compete with other interests, many of which have greater financial resources than we have, for the opportunity to participate in promising projects. Similarly, we market our product in competition with supplies from a very limited number of competitors, most of whom currently are state-sponsored operations producing at lower, subsidized costs.
Nuclear energy competes with other sources of energy, including natural gas, oil, coal, hydroelectricity and renewable energy sources. These other energy sources are to some extent interchangeable with nuclear energy, particularly in the long term. Lower prices of natural gas, oil, coal and hydroelectricity may result in lower demand for uranium concentrate and uranium conversion services. Technical advances in and government support for renewable energy sources could make these forms of energy more viable and have a greater impact on nuclear fuel demands. Further, the growth of the uranium and nuclear power industry beyond its current level will depend upon continued and increased acceptance of nuclear technology as a means of generating electricity. Because of unique political, technological and environmental factors that affect the nuclear industry, the industry is subject to public opinion risks which could have an adverse impact on the demand for nuclear power, whether through increased regulation or otherwise.
Requirements for our products and services may be affected by technological changes in nuclear reactors, enrichment, and used uranium fuel reprocessing. These technological changes could reduce, or increase, the demand for uranium. The cost competitiveness of our operations may be impacted through development of new uranium recovery and processing technologies. As a result, our competitors may adopt technological advancements that provide them an advantage over our operational and production costs.
Lack of acceptance of or outright opposition to nuclear energy could impede our business.
Our future business prospects are tied to the electrical utility industry in the U.S. and worldwide. Deregulation of and other fundamental changes in the utility industry, particularly in the U.S. and Europe, is expected to affect the market for nuclear and other fuels for years to come and may result in a wide range of outcomes including the expansion or the premature shutdown of nuclear reactors. Maintaining the demand for uranium at current levels and future growth in demand will depend upon the continued acceptance of the nuclear technology as a means of generating electricity. Unique political and public perception factors impact the nuclear fuel cycle industries, including uranium miners. In recent years, government entities and non-governmental organizations have become more aggressive with respect to opposition of certain mining activities including specifically uranium recovery. These actions may affect our operations even if the opposition is directed at entities or projects unrelated to our Company. Lack of continued public acceptance of nuclear technology would adversely affect the demand for nuclear power and potentially increase the regulation of the nuclear power industry. Following the events of March 2011 in Fukushima Japan, worldwide reaction called into question the public’s confidence in nuclear energy and technology, the effects of which are still apparent in many countries. Additionally, media coverage about uranium production and nuclear energy may be inaccurate or non-objective and further negatively impact public perception of our industry.
Our business is subject to extensive environmental and other regulations that may make exploring, mining or related activities expensive, and which may change at any time.
The mining industry is subject to extensive environmental and other laws and regulations, which may change at any time. Environmental legislation and regulation continue to evolve in ways which will likely require stricter standards and enforcement, increased fines and penalties for non-compliance, more stringent environmental assessments of proposed projects, increased reclamation obligations and attendant costs (and costs of bonding), and a heightened degree of responsibility for companies and their officers, directors and employees. Various regulatory actions related to the protection of the greater sage-grouse, for example, are ongoing. EPA rulemakings which may have significant impacts on ISR projects continue to occur from time to time and are likely to recur in future administrations. Proposed CERCLA regulations, which would have significantly increased financial obligations and surety bonding, including possibly ISR projects, may also recur. These are not the only laws and regulations which would result in restrictive changes. Moreover, compliance with environmental quality requirements and reclamation laws imposed by federal, state and local authorities may require significant capital outlays, materially affect the economics of a given property, cause material changes or delays in intended activities, and potentially expose us to litigation and other legal or administrative proceedings. We cannot accurately predict or estimate the impact of any such future laws or regulations, or future interpretations of existing laws and regulations, on our operations. Historic exploration activities have occurred on many of our properties, and mining and energy production activities have occurred on or near certain of our properties. If such historic activities have resulted in releases or threatened releases of regulated substances to the environment, or historic activities require remediation, potential for liability may exist under federal or state remediation statutes.
Risk Factors Related to our Mining Operations
Our mining operations involve a high degree of risk.
Mining operations generally involve a high degree of risk. We continue operations at our first and, currently, only, uranium in situ recovery facility at Lost Creek, where production activities commenced in 2013. Our operations at Lost Creek, which is a remote site in south-central Wyoming, and at other projects as they continue in development, will be subject to all the hazards and risks normally encountered at remote sites in Wyoming, including safety in commuting and severe weather which can affect such commutes and may slow operations, particularly during winter weather conditions. Additionally, these operations are subject to all the hazards and risks normally encountered in the production of uranium by in situ methods of recovery, such as water management and treatment, including wastewater disposal capacity (deep wells, Class V wells, ponds or other methods; each of which requires regulatory authorizations and varying levels of expense to install and operate), unusual and unexpected geological formations, unanticipated metallurgical difficulties, equipment malfunctions and availability of parts, interruptions of electrical power and communications, other conditions involved in the drilling and removal of material through pressurized injection and production wells, radiation safety, transportation and industrial accidents, and natural disaster (e.g., fire, tornado), any of which could result in damage to, or destruction of, production facilities, damage to life or property, environmental damage and possible legal liability. Adverse effects on operations and/or further development of our projects could also adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flow.
Our mineral resource estimates may not be reliable and are inherently more uncertain than estimates of proven and probable reserves; there is risk and increased uncertainty to commencing and conducting production without established mineral reserves.
Our properties do not contain mineral reserves as defined under Canadian National Instrument 43-101 or SEC Industry Guide 7 and Sub-part 1300 of Regulation S-K (“S-K 1300”). See “Cautionary Note to United States Investors Concerning Disclosure of Mineral Resources” above. Until mineral reserves or mineral resources are mined and processed, the quantity of mineral resources and grades must be considered as estimates only. We have established the existence of uranium resources for certain uranium projects, including at the Lost Creek Property. We have not established proven or probable reserves, as defined by Canadian securities regulators or the SEC under Industry Guide 7 or S-K 1300, through the completion of a feasibility study, for any of our uranium projects, including the Lost Creek Property. Furthermore, we currently have no plans to establish proven or probable reserves for any of our uranium projects for which we plan to utilize ISR mining, such as the Lost Creek Property or the Shirley Basin Project. As a result, and despite the fact that we commenced recovery of U3O8 at the Lost Creek Project in 2013, there is an increased uncertainty and risk that may result in economic and technical failure which may adversely impact our future profitability.
There are numerous uncertainties inherent in estimating quantities of mineral resources, including many factors beyond our control, and no assurance can be given that the recovery of mineral resources, or even estimated mineral reserves, will be realized. In general, estimates of mineral resources are based upon several factors and assumptions made as of the date on which the estimates were determined, including:
·
geological and engineering estimates that have inherent uncertainties and the assumed effects of regulation by governmental agencies;
·
the judgment of the geologists, engineers and other professionals preparing the estimate;
·
estimates of future uranium prices and operating costs;
·
the quality and quantity of available data;
·
the interpretation of that data; and
·
the accuracy of various mandated economic assumptions, all of which may vary considerably from actual results.
All estimates are, to some degree, uncertain; with in situ recovery, this is due in part to limited sampling information collected prior to mining. For these reasons, estimates of the recoverable mineral resources prepared by different professionals or by the same professionals at different times, may vary substantially. As such, there is significant uncertainty in any mineral resource estimate and actual deposits encountered and the economic viability of a deposit may differ materially from our estimates.
We are depleting our mineral resources and must develop additional resources to sustain ongoing operations.
We have been in operation for several years and are depleting the known mineral resource at Lost Creek, which remains our only uranium recovery operation currently. As a result, we must be able to continue to conduct exploration and develop additional mineral resources. While there remain large areas of our Lost Creek Project which require additional exploration, we will need to continue to explore all project areas of the Lost Creek Property and our other mineral properties in Wyoming, or acquire additional, known mineral resource properties to replenish our mineral resources and sustain continued operations. We estimate life of mine when we prepare our mineral resource estimates, but such estimates may not be correct.
Our property title and rights may be uncertain and could be challenged.
Although we have obtained title opinions with respect to certain of our properties, there is no guarantee that title to any of our properties will not be challenged or impugned. Third parties may have valid claims underlying portions of our interests. Our mineral properties in the U.S. consist of leases covering state lands, unpatented mining claims and patented mining claims and lands. Many of our mining properties in the U.S. are unpatented mining claims to which we have only possessory title. Because title to unpatented mining claims is subject to inherent uncertainties, it is difficult to determine conclusively ownership of such claims. These uncertainties relate to such things as sufficiency of mineral discovery, proper posting and marking of boundaries and possible conflicts with other claims not determinable from descriptions of record. The present status of our unpatented mining claims located on public lands allows us the exclusive right to mine and remove valuable minerals. We are allowed to use the surface of the public lands solely for purposes related to mining and processing the mineral-bearing ores. However, legal ownership of the land remains with the U.S. We remain at risk that the mining claims may be forfeited either to the U.S. or to rival private claimants due to failure to comply with statutory requirements. Certain of the changes which have been proposed in recent years to amend or replace the General Mining Law of 1872, as amended, could also have an impact on the rights we currently have in our patented and unpatented mining claims. Similarly, we believe that we have necessary rights to surface use and access in areas for which we have mineral rights other than pursuant to a federal unpatented mining claim. Those rights may also be challenged, resulting in delay or additional cost to assert and confirm our rights. We have taken or will take appropriate curative measures to ensure proper title to our mineral properties and rights in surface use or access, where necessary and where possible.
Our mining operations are subject to numerous environmental laws, regulations and permitting requirements and bonding requirements that can delay production and adversely affect operating and development costs.
Our business is subject to extensive federal, state and local laws governing all stages of exploration, development and operations at our mineral properties, taxes, labor standards and occupational health, mine and radiation safety, toxic substances, endangered species protections, and other matters. Exploration, development and production operations are also subject to various federal, state and local laws and regulations relating to the protection of the environment. These laws impose high standards on the mining industry, and particularly standards with respect to uranium recovery, to monitor the discharge of wastewater and report the results of such monitoring to regulatory authorities, to reduce or eliminate certain effects on or into land, water or air, to progressively restore mine properties, to manage hazardous wastes and materials and to reduce the risk of worker accidents. A violation of these laws may result in the imposition of substantial fines and other penalties and potentially expose us to operational restrictions, suspension, administrative proceedings or litigation. Many of these laws and regulations have tended to become more stringent over time. Any change in such laws could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, cash flow or results of operations. There can be no assurance that we will be able to meet all the regulatory requirements in a timely manner or without significant expense or that the regulatory requirements will not change to delay or prohibit us from proceeding with certain exploration, development or operations. Further, there is no assurance that we will not face new challenges by third parties to regulatory decisions when made, which may cause additional delay and substantial expense, or may cause a project to be permanently halted.
Our operations require licenses and permits from various governmental authorities. We believe we hold all necessary licenses and permits to carry on the activities which we are currently conducting or propose to conduct under applicable laws and regulations. Such licenses and permits are subject to changes in regulations and changes in various operating circumstances. There can be no guarantee that we will be able to obtain all necessary licenses and permits that may be required to maintain our exploration and mining activities (or amendments to expand or alter existing operations), including constructing mines, milling or processing facilities and commencing or continuing exploration or mining activities or operations at any of our properties. In addition, if we proceed to production on any other property or new geologic horizon, we must obtain and comply with permits and licenses which will contain specific operating conditions. There can be no assurance that we will be able to obtain such permits and licenses or that we will be able to comply with any and all such conditions.
Possible amendments to the General Mining Law could make it more difficult or impossible for us to execute our business plan.
Members of the U.S. Congress have repeatedly introduced bills which would materially amend or replace the provisions of the Mining Law of 1872, as amended, including certain such bills proposed in 2019. Such bills have proposed, among other things, to (i) significantly alter the laws and regulations relating to uranium mineral development and recovery from unpatented and patented mining claims; (ii) impose a federal royalty on production from unpatented mining claims and/or impose other taxes or additional fees on the use or occupancy of federal lands; (iii) impose time limits on the effectiveness of plans of operation that may not coincide with mine life; (iv) convert in part or in whole the existing land holdings program, requiring unpatented mining claims to be taken to lease in a new program under certain circumstances and imposing other circumstances in which the unpatented mining claim would have to be abandoned; (v) limit the mineral property holdings of any single person or company under various stages from prospecting through operations; (vi) impose more stringent environmental compliance and reclamation requirements on activities on unpatented mining claims; (vii) allow states, localities and Native American tribes to petition for the withdrawal of identified tracts of federal land from the operation of the U.S. mining laws; (viii) eliminate or greatly limit the right to a mineral patent; and (ix) allow for administrative determinations that mining would not be allowed in situations where undue degradation of the federal lands in question could not be prevented.
If enacted, such legislation could, among other effects, change the cost of holding unpatented mining claims or leases or the duration for which the claims or leases could be held without development, and could significantly impact our ability to develop locatable mineral resources on our patented and unpatented mining claims. Although it is impossible to predict at this point what any legislated royalties might be, enactment could adversely affect the potential for development and the economics of existing operating mines. Passage of such legislation could adversely affect our financial performance, including that proposals imposing a royalty or otherwise impacting holding and operational costs of mining claims, if passed, could render mineral projects uneconomic.
Additionally, as noted in other risk factors, there are ongoing withdrawals of federal lands for the purposes of mineral location and development. While certain of these proposals have been withdrawn or not finalized and, as yet, no proposal directly affects the areas of Wyoming and Nevada in which we currently have land holdings, such actions could have an adverse effect on our financial performance if they are broadened in scope to directly affect the areas in which we have properties. The reasons for withdrawals are also being broadened in certain recent legislative proposals.
We depend on services of our management, and key personnel, contractors and service providers, and the timely availability of such individuals and providers cannot be assured now on during a ramp-up.
Shareholders will be relying on the good faith, experience and judgment of our management and advisors providing for the effective management of the business and our operations and in selecting and developing future opportunities. We may need to recruit additional qualified employees, contractors and service providers to supplement existing management and personnel, and we will need to hire additional employees if and as we ramp-up Lost Creek operations and as we develop the Shirley Basin Project. Timely availability of staffing and retention of contractors cannot be assured in our industry, many aspects of which are highly specialized. This is particularly true in the current labor markets in which we recruit our employees and the remote locations for which employees and contractors are needed. As well, the skilled professionals with expertise in geologic, engineering and process aspects of in situ recovery, radiation safety and other facets of our business are currently in high demand, as there are relatively few such professionals with both expertise and experience. The sustained downturn of the uranium production industry in the past several years makes these challenges even more pronounced. Even with return to full production operations, we will continue to be dependent on a relatively small number of key persons, including key contractors, the loss of any one or several of whom could have an adverse effect on our business and operations. We do not hold key man insurance in respect of any of our executive officers.
The SEC’s adoption of the “Modernization of Property Disclosures for Mining Registrants” may result in changes to our existing technical reports and mineral resources, and will result in increased compliance costs.
The Modernization of Property Disclosures for Mining Registrants (“S-K 1300”) will rescind and replace Industry Guide 7 and requires us to disclose specific information related to our material mining operations including concerning our reported mineral resources at Lost Creek and Shirley Basin in existing NI 43-101 technical reports. While S-K 1300 has similarities with NI 43-101, we will conform our existing technical reports to comply with both S-K 1300 and NI 43-101, which may result in revisions to our estimated mineral resources and other aspects of existing reports, and will add to our compliance costs. Also, disclosures under S-K 1300 will be subject to currently unknown interpretations. We are unable at this time to predict the nature of any future enforcement, interpretation, or application of S-K 1300 by the SEC. Any additional revisions to, or interpretations of, S-K 1300 could also result in additional time and possibly unforeseen cost associated with compliance.
Our results of exploration and ultimate production are highly uncertain.
The exploration for, and development of, mineral deposits involves significant risks which a combination of careful evaluation, experience and knowledge may not eliminate. Few properties which are explored are ultimately developed into producing mines. Major expenses may be required to establish mineral resources or reserves, to develop metallurgical processes and to construct mining and processing facilities at a site. It is impossible to ensure that our current exploration and development programs will result in profitable commercial operations; this is true for our Excel gold project as well as our uranium mineral properties.
Whether a mineral deposit will be commercially viable depends on many factors, including the attributes of the deposit, such as size, grade and proximity to infrastructure, as well as uranium and gold prices, which are highly cyclical. Government regulations, including regulations relating to prices, taxes, royalties, land tenure, land use, importing and exporting of uranium and environmental protection also are factors in determining commercial viability of a mineral project. The exact effect of these factors cannot be accurately predicted, but the combination of these factors may result in us not receiving an adequate return on invested capital.
Climate change and climate change legislation or regulations could impact our operations.
Although we play an important role in addressing climate change with our production of uranium to fuel clean nuclear power, we, too, may be subject to risks associated with climate change which could harm our results of operations and increase our costs and expenses. The occurrence of severe adverse weather conditions may have a potentially serious impact on our operations. Adverse weather may result in physical damage to our operations, instability of our infrastructure and equipment, or alter the supply of electricity our Lost Creek Property. Impacts may affect worker productivity at our projects. Should any impacts of climate change be material in nature or occur for lengthy periods of time, our financial condition or results of operations would be adversely affected.
U.S., Canadian, and other international legislative or regulatory action intended to ensure the protection of the environment are constantly changing and evolving in a manner expected to result in stricter standards and enforcement, larger fines and liability, and potentially increased capital expenditures and operating costs. While we will continue to monitor and assess any new policies, legislation or regulations regarding such matters, we currently believe that the impact of any such legislation on our business will not be significant.
Risks Factors Related to our Financial Circumstances
The uranium mining industry is capital intensive, and we may be unable to raise necessary additional funding.
Additional funds will be required for working capital and exploration and development activities at our properties including Lost Creek and the adjoining projects at the Lost Creek Property, as well as the development of our Shirley Basin project. Potential sources of future funds available to us, in addition to the proceeds from sales of current inventory or future production, include the sale of additional equity capital, proceeds from the exercise of outstanding convertible equity instruments, borrowing of funds or other debt structure, project financing, or the sale of our interests in assets. Continued volatility in the equity markets, particularly the commodities and energy markets, may increase the costs attendant to any financing. There is no assurance that such funding will be available to us to renew full production operations or to fund continued development or future exploration. Further, even if such financing is successfully completed, there can be no assurance that it will be obtained on terms favorable to us or will provide us with sufficient funds to meet our objectives, which may adversely affect our business and financial position.
Restrictive covenants in the agreements governing our indebtedness may restrict our ability to pursue our business strategies.
Our State Bond Loan, under which we currently owe approximately $12.4 million in principal, includes restrictive covenants that, among other things, limit our ability to sell the assets securing our indebtedness (which include our Lost Creek Project and related assets).
If we are unable to service our debt, we could lose the assets securing our indebtedness.
Our ability to make scheduled payments and satisfy other covenants in the State Bond Loan depends on our financial condition and operating performance, which are subject to prevailing economic, competitive, legislative and regulatory conditions beyond our control. We may be unable to generate a level of cash flow from operating activities sufficient to permit us to pay the principal, interest and other fees on our indebtedness.
If we cannot make scheduled payments on our debt, we will be in default which, if not addressed or waived, could require accelerated repayment of our indebtedness and enforcement by the lender against the assets securing our indebtedness. The secured collateral for the State Bond Loan includes the Lost Creek Project and assets related to it and other projects of the Lost Creek Property. These are key assets on which our business is substantially dependent and, as such, the enforcement against any one or all these assets would have a material adverse effect on our operations and financial condition.
Production, capital and operating cost estimates may be inaccurate.
We prepare estimates of annual and future production, the attendant production and operational costs and required working capital for such levels of production, but there is no assurance that we will achieve those estimates. These types of estimates are inherently uncertain and may change materially over time. Operational cost estimates are affected by changes in production levels and may be affected by a need to utilize a greater level of contractor services if required staffing is unavailable or cannot timely be hired and trained. Availability and consistent pricing of materials necessary in the installation of wells, surface production equipment, associated infrastructure, chemicals for processing and, expendable materials related to operations can be variable depending on economic conditions locally and worldwide and may force changes in operations and timing of resource production. In addition, we rely on certain contractors related to the installation of wells and technical services associated with that installation. Their availability or cost of service can change depending on other local market conditions and may therefore affect the installation and production rates of mining.
Risks Related to our Common Shares
We have never paid dividends and do not currently expect to do so in the near future. Therefore, if our share price does not appreciate, our investors may not gain and could potentially lose on their investment in our shares.
We have not paid dividends on our Common Shares since incorporation and do not anticipate doing so in the foreseeable future. We currently intend to retain all available funds and any future earnings to fund the growth of our business. Payments of any dividends will be at the discretion of our Board after considering many factors, including our financial condition and current and anticipated cash needs. As a result, capital appreciation, if any, of our shares will be an investor’s sole source of gain for the foreseeable future.
Failure to meet the listing maintenance criteria of the NYSE American may result in the delisting of our Common Shares, which could result in lower trading volumes and liquidity, lower prices of our Common Shares and make it more difficult for us to raise capital.
Our Common Shares are listed on the NYSE American and we are subject to its continued listing requirements, including maintaining certain share prices and a minimum amount of shareholder equity. The market price of our Common Shares has been and may continue to be subject to significant fluctuation. If we are unable to comply with the NYSE American continued listing requirements, including its trading price requirements, our Common Shares may be suspended from trading on and/or delisted from the NYSE American. Although we have not been notified of any delisting proceedings, there is no assurance that we will not receive such notice in the future or that we will be able to then comply with NYSE American listing standards. The delisting of our Common Shares from the NYSE American may materially impair our shareholders’ ability to buy and sell our Common Shares and could have an adverse effect on the market price of, and the efficiency of the trading market for, our Common Shares. In addition, the delisting of our Common Shares could significantly impair our ability to raise capital.
Further, if our Common Shares were delisted from the NYSE American, they might be subject to the so-called “penny stock” rules. For any transaction involving a “penny stock,” unless exempt pursuant to SEC regulations, the rules impose additional sales practice requirements on broker-dealers, subject to certain exceptions. If our Common Shares were determined to be a “penny stock,” a broker-dealer may find it more difficult to trade our Common Shares and an investor may find it more difficult to acquire or dispose of our Common Shares on the secondary market. These factors could also significantly negatively affect the market price of our Common Shares and our ability to raise capital.
The trading price of our Common Shares may experience substantial volatility.
The market price of our Common Shares may experience substantial volatility that is unrelated to the Company's financial condition or operations. The trading price of our Common Shares may also be significantly affected by short-term changes in the price of uranium. The market price of the Company's securities is affected by many other variables which may be unrelated to our success and are, therefore, not within our control. These include other developments that affect the market for all resource sector-related securities, the breadth of the public market for the common shares and the attractiveness of alternative investments market reaction to the estimated fair value of our portfolio; rumors or dissemination of false information; changes in coverage or earnings estimates by analysts; our ability to meet analysts’ or market expectations; and sales of common shares by existing shareholders. The effect of these and other factors on the market price of the common shares is expected to make the price of the common shares volatile in the future, which may result in losses to investors.
You may experience future dilution as a result of additional equity offerings.
To raise additional capital, we may in the future offer additional of our Common Shares or other securities convertible into or exchangeable for our Common Shares at prices that may not be the same as the price per share as the shares an investor has previously purchased, and investors purchasing shares or other securities in the future could have rights superior to existing shareholders.
U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences to U.S. Shareholders under the Passive Foreign Investment Company Rules
Investors in the Common Shares of Ur-Energy that are U.S. taxpayers (referred to as a U.S. shareholder) should be aware that we may be a “passive foreign investment company” (a “PFIC”) for the period ended December 31, 2020 and may be a PFIC in subsequent years. If we are a PFIC for any year during a U.S. shareholder’s holding period, then such U.S. shareholders generally will be subject to a special, highly adverse tax regime with respect to so-called “excess distributions” received on our Common Shares. Gain realized upon a disposition of our Common Shares (including upon certain dispositions that would otherwise be tax-free) also will be treated as an excess distribution. Excess distributions are punitively taxed and are subject to additional interest charges. Additional special adverse rules also apply to U.S. shareholders who own our Common Shares if we are a PFIC and have a non-U.S. subsidiary that is also a PFIC (a “lower-tier PFIC”).
A U.S. shareholder may make a timely "qualified electing fund" election (“QEF election”) or a "mark-to-market" election with respect to our Common Shares to mitigate the adverse tax rules that apply to PFICs, but these elections may accelerate the recognition of taxable income and may result in the recognition of ordinary income. To be timely, a QEF election generally must be made for the first year in the U.S. shareholder’s holding period in which Ur-Energy is a PFIC. A U.S. shareholder may make a QEF election only if the U.S. shareholder receives certain information (known as a “PFIC annual information statement”) from us annually. A U.S. shareholder may make a QEF election with respect to a lower-tier PFIC only if it receives a PFIC annual information statement with respect to the lower tier PFIC. The mark-to-market election is available only if our Common Shares are considered regularly traded on a qualifying exchange, which we cannot assure will be the case for years in which it may be a PFIC. The mark-to-market election is not available for a lower-tier PFIC.
We will use commercially reasonable efforts to make available to U.S. shareholders, upon their written request (i) timely and accurate information as to our status as a PFIC and the PFIC status of any subsidiary in which Ur-Energy owns more than 50% of such subsidiary’s total aggregate voting power, and (ii) for each year in which Ur-Energy determines that it is a PFIC, upon written request, a PFIC annual information statement with respect to Ur-Energy and with respect to each such subsidiary that we determine is a PFIC.
Special adverse rules that impact certain estate planning goals could apply to our Common Shares if we are a PFIC. Each U.S. shareholder should consult its own tax advisor regarding the U.S. federal, state and local consequences of the PFIC rules, and regarding the QEF and mark-to-market elections.
General Risk Factors
The impacts of the COVID-19 (Coronavirus) pandemic are likely to continue throughout 2021 and the specific impacts to our Company remain uncertain.
COVID-19 (Coronavirus), declared a pandemic in March 2020, has had a significant negative impact on the global economy and commodity and equity markets, and the outlook remains uncertain. The pandemic poses risk to our business and operations, and could adversely impact our operations, business and financial condition if our employees, regulators, suppliers or other business partners are prevented from conducting routine operations for periods of time. While we continue to monitor these conditions, including government restrictions on movement and operations, it is impossible to predict the extent of any such impact or the levels of success of responsive actions to impacts, as the circumstances continue to evolve, including in unforeseeable ways. We are a highly regulated industry and while the regulators are available to address operational impacts from illness, governmental restrictions and other effects, it remains uncertain whether all impacts can be timely addressed with our operations and with the regulators. We are and will remain fully engaged with our employees in our efforts to protect their health and safety.
To the extent the COVID-19 pandemic may adversely affect our business and financial results, it may also have the effect of heightening many of the other risks described throughout this Item 1A related to Risk Factors such as those relating to our ability to access additional capital, which could negatively affect our business. Because of the highly uncertain and dynamic nature of events relating to the COVID-19 pandemic, it is not currently possible to estimate the continuing or future impact of the pandemic on our business. However, these effects could have a material impact on our operations, and we will continue to monitor the COVID-19 (Coronavirus) situation closely.
Our insurance coverage could be insufficient.
We currently carry insurance coverage for general liability, property and casualty, directors’ and officers’ liability and other matters. We intend to carry insurance to protect against certain risks in amounts we consider adequate. Certain insurances may be cost prohibitive to maintain, and even if we carried all such insurances, the nature of the risks we face in our exploration and uranium production operations is such that liabilities could exceed policy limits in any insurance policy or could be excluded from coverage under an insurance policy. The potential costs that could be associated with any liabilities not covered by insurance or which exceed insurance coverage, or compliance with applicable laws and regulations, may cause substantial delays or interruption of operations and require significant capital outlays, adversely affecting our business and financial position. We cannot assure that even our current coverages will continue to be available at acceptable cost or that coverage limits will remain at current levels, any of which could result in adverse effects upon our business and financial condition. We may be required to obtain additional types of insurance or increase existing coverage amounts due to changes in regulation of the mining and nuclear fuel cycle industries. Additionally, we utilize a bonding surety program for our regulatory, reclamation and restoration obligations at Lost Creek and the Pathfinder Mines sites. Availability of and terms for such surety arrangements may change in the future, resulting in adverse effects to our financial condition.
We are subject to risks associated with litigation, governmental or regulatory investigations or challenges, and other legal proceedings.
Defense and settlement costs of legal claims can be substantial, even with respect to claims that have no merit. From time to time, we may be involved in disputes with other parties which may result in litigation or other proceedings. Additionally, it is not unlikely that we may find ourselves involved directly or indirectly in legal proceedings, in the form of governmental or regulatory investigations, administrative proceedings or litigation, arising from challenges to regulatory actions as described elsewhere in this annual report. Such investigations, administrative proceedings and litigation related to regulatory matters may delay or halt exploration or development of our projects. The results of litigation or any other proceedings cannot be predicted with certainty. If we are unable to resolve any such disputes favorably, it could have a material adverse effect on our financial position, ability to operate, results of operations or our property development.
We are dependent on information technology systems, which are subject to certain risks.
We depend upon information technology systems in a variety of ways throughout our operations. Any significant breakdown of those systems, whether through virus, cyber-attack, security breach, theft, or other destruction, invasion or interruption, or unauthorized access to our systems, could negatively impact our business and operations. To the extent that such invasion, cyber-attack or similar security breach results in disruption to our operations, loss or disclosure of, or damage to, our data and particularly our confidential or proprietary information, our reputation, business, results of operations and financial condition could be materially adversely affected. Our systems, internal controls and insurance for protecting against such cyber security risks may be insufficient. Although to date we have experienced no such attack resulting in material losses, we may suffer such losses at any time in the future. We may be required to expend significant additional resources to continue to modify and enhance our protective measures or to investigate, restore or remediate any information technology security vulnerabilities.
Acquisitions and integration may disrupt our business, and we may not obtain full anticipated value of certain acquisitions due to the condition of the markets.
From time to time, we examine opportunities to acquire additional mining assets and businesses. Any acquisition that we may choose to complete may be of significant size, may change the scale of our business and operations, and/or may expose us to new geographic, political, operating, financial and geological risks. Any acquisition would be accompanied by risks. For example, there may be a significant change in commodity prices after we have committed to complete the transaction and established the purchase price or share exchange ratio; a material ore body may prove to be below expectations; we may have difficulty integrating and assimilating the operations and personnel of an acquired company, realizing anticipated synergies and maximizing the financial and strategic position of the combined enterprise, and maintaining uniform standards, policies and controls across the organization; the integration of the acquired business or assets may disrupt our ongoing business and relationships with employees, customers, suppliers and contractors; and the acquired business or assets may have unknown liabilities which may be significant. There can be no assurance that we would be successful in overcoming these risks or any other problems encountered in connection with such acquisitions.

---

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
Item 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
None.

---

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES

---

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
Item 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
None.

---

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURE
Item 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURE
Our operations and other activities at Lost Creek are not subject to regulation by the Federal Mine Safety and Health Administration (“MSHA”) under the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977 (the “Mine Act”).
PART II

---

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY
Item 5. MARKET FOR registrant’s COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS and issuer purcHases of equity securities
Market Information
Since July 24, 2008, Ur-Energy’s Common Shares have been listed for trading on the NYSE American exchange under the trading symbol “URG.” Since November 29, 2005, Ur-Energy’s Common Shares have been listed and posted for trading on the Toronto Stock Exchange under the trading symbol “URE.”
Holders
The authorized capital of Ur-Energy consists of an unlimited number of Common Shares and an unlimited number of Class A Preference Shares. As of February 24, 2021, 188,871,300 Common Shares are issued and outstanding and no preferred shares are issued and outstanding. We estimate that we have approximately 4,850 beneficial holders of our Common Shares. The holders of the Common Shares are entitled to one vote per share at all meetings of our shareholders. The holders of Common Shares are also entitled to dividends, if and when declared by our Board and the distribution of the residual assets of the Company in the event of a liquidation, dissolution or winding up.
Our Class A Preference Shares are issuable by the Board in one or more series and the Board has the right and obligation to fix the number of shares in, and determine the designation, rights, privileges, restrictions and conditions attaching to the shares of each series. The rights of the holders of Common Shares will be subject to, and may be adversely affected by, the rights of the holders of any Class A Preference Shares that may be issued in the future. The Class A Preference Shares, may, at the discretion of the Board, be entitled to a preference over the Common Shares and any other shares ranking junior to the Class A Preference Shares with respect to the payment of dividends and distribution of assets in the event of liquidation, dissolution or winding up.
Dividends
To date, we have not paid any dividends on our outstanding Common Shares and have no current intention to declare dividends on the Common Shares in the foreseeable future. Any decision to pay dividends on our Common Shares in the future will depend upon our financial requirements to finance future growth, the general financial condition of the Company and other factors which our Board may consider appropriate in the circumstances.
Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans
The following table sets forth certain summary information concerning our equity compensation plans as at December 31, 2020. Directors, officers, employees, and consultants are eligible to participate in the Option Plan. Directors and employees, including executive officers, are eligible to participate in the RSU Plan.
Number of Common Shares to be Issued Upon Exercise of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights
Weighted Average Exercise Price of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights (2)
(US$)
Number of Common Shares Remaining for Future Issuance (Excluding Common Shares to be Issued Upon Exercise of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights)
Equity compensation plans approved by securityholders (1)
13,315,386
$ 0.61
1,692,334
Equity compensation plans not approved by security-holders
-
-
-
(1)
Our shareholders have approved both the Ur-Energy Inc. Amended and Restated Stock Option Plan 2005, as amended, and the Ur-Energy Inc. Amended Restricted Share Unit Plan.
(2)
The exercise price represents the weighted exercise price of the 11,910,424 outstanding stock options under the Ur-Energy Inc. Amended and Restated Stock Option Plan 2005.
Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities
During the fiscal years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, we did not have any sales of securities in transactions that were not registered under the Securities Act.
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
The Company did not purchase its own equity securities during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020.

---

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
Item 6. RESERVED

---

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Item 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATION
Business Overview
The following discussion is designed to provide information that we believe necessary for an understanding of our financial condition, changes in financial condition and results of our operations. The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the accompanying audited consolidated financial statements and related notes. The financial statements have been prepared in accordance with US GAAP.
Industry Update and Trends
The new year brings cause for growing confidence in the nuclear fuel industries, including uranium production. Having persevered through many years of suppressed low pricing, including the threats to overall market stability created by foreign state-sponsored producers, U.S. uranium miners have recently seen signs there may be increasing support in Washington and that industry-wide fundamentals are strengthening. The Biden Administration is prioritizing climate change initiatives and its leaders have expressed an understanding that clean, carbon-free nuclear energy must be an integral part of those initiatives.
These positive signs follow several years during which uranium producers, including our Company, have implemented decisions to halt planned development activities as well as to operate at lower rates of production. These slowdowns in production and reductions in development were compounded by the pandemic of 2020. As a result, reductions in workforces continue to be implemented throughout the industry. As discussed elsewhere in this report, we continued in 2020 to restrict production rates, conducted no further development activities and, in Q3, reduced production levels even further. The further reduction in production was accompanied by a further reduction in force at Lost Creek, as well as in the corporate services group of the Company. While these constraints by U.S. miners ensure near-term U.S. production will remain low, imports continued to dominate the 2020 U.S. market in even greater proportions.
The U.S. Energy Information Administration (“EIA”) published uranium production results, showing that the 173,875 pounds produced in 2019 is the lowest in U.S. history (and, nearly 90% lower than 2018). In 2020, the EIA reported Q1 production in the U.S. as 8,098 pounds U3O8; thereafter, the EIA reports did not include specific production numbers as it advised it “could not publicly release data for U.S. production of uranium concentrate. . .because production activity did not reach a threshold where a specific production figure could be published without violating the [confidentiality] protections that EIA has committed to provide.”
In early 2018, in response to market conditions, primary among them imports into the U.S. emanating from state-sponsored producers in Russia, Kazakhstan, and Uzbekistan, Ur-Energy USA and Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc. (“Energy Fuels”) initiated a trade action with the U.S. Department of Commerce (“DOC”) pursuant to Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act. While the trade action was not directly successful, it did result in the formation of the United States Nuclear Fuel Working Group (the “Working Group”) which was charged to develop recommendations for the Administration for reviving and expanding domestic uranium production.
In April 2020, the Working Group, through the Department of Energy (“DOE”), released its report, “Restoring America’s Competitive Nuclear Energy Advantage - A strategy to assure U.S. national security.” Relevant to uranium miners, the recommendations included, first, that the U.S. government make direct purchases of 17 to 19 million total pounds of U3O8 to replenish the American Assured Fuel Supply (“AAFS”) uranium reserve. Additionally, the report recommended that a new national uranium reserve be established through DOE’s proposed budgeted purchases of domestically produced uranium, beginning in FY2021 and continuing for ten years. The approved FY2021 DOE budget includes $75 million for the reserve program. If budget appropriations are secured annually and the program is implemented in a timely fashion, these purchases would provide direct support to the front end of the fuel cycle and help re-establish our nation’s critical capabilities.
The Working Group report also called for support of the DOC efforts to extend the Russian Suspension Agreement (“RSA”) to protect against future uranium dumping. In early October, the DOC completed the amendment and extension of the RSA. The RSA amendment continues caps on Russian imports of nuclear fuel to the U.S. for an additional 20 years, through 2040. The amendment reduces the current cap of 20% of demand to an average of 17% of demand over the 20-year period, with reductions starting in 2028 and continuing through 2040. The amendment also closes other practical loopholes to protect the U.S. market, provides for administrative reviews during the term, and contemplates potential extensions. These provisions in the RSA are positive developments in the long term. Additionally, the amended RSA was codified as federal law in December 2020, which serves to protect against the prospect of Russian rescission of the agreement.
The Working Group report also recommends support for the restart of the sole U.S. conversion plant beginning no later than 2022 to produce 6,000 to 7,500 tons of UF6 and thereafter to restart domestic enrichment in or about 2023, with at least 25 percent of material being unobligated. By law, unobligated material must be sourced domestically. Subsequently, in February 2021, ConverDyn conversion facility announced its plan to restart processing and production in 2023.
There can be no certainty of further action on the Working Group’s Report recommendations, including the timing for any such action or implementation, the successful budgeting for such actions or sustainability of any programs established further to the recommendations. Therefore, the outcome of these continuing processes and the effects on the U.S. uranium market remains uncertain.
Additional federal legislation was introduced in 2020 which is designed to revitalize the country’s nuclear infrastructure: the American Nuclear Infrastructure Act of 2020 (“ANIA”) includes the authorization for a uranium reserve to fuel America’s nuclear reactors with domestic fuel, among other items, to preserve America’s uranium industry.
The pandemic has had and will continue to have an impact on the global uranium market. The many temporary suspensions and adjustments in production announced in early 2020 led to the removal of as much as 46 million pounds of primary production on an annualized basis. While there were certain restarts mid-year, many did not last and operations were, again, suspended or slowed. Cameco’s Cigar Lake, for example, suspended operations in April 2020, restarted production in September and suspended production again in December over safety concerns related to the COVID-19 virus. Production at Cigar Lake remains suspended at this time. Kazatomprom also suspended and slowed production operations during 2020 and has announced reductions in production continuing through 2022.
Supply-demand fundamentals continue to strengthen with projections for sustained growth of global nuclear power in coming years through traditional uses and the construction of advanced reactors of various types. Growing numbers of countries are making commitments to net-zero emissions, which will likely require nuclear energy to meet such objectives.
2020 Developments
COVID-19 (Coronavirus)
COVID-19 (Coronavirus) was declared a pandemic in March 2020. Throughout the year, gathering and other restrictions existed at various levels in Wyoming and Colorado. As these restrictions changed, we have adapted accordingly. We have monitored and sought to adhere to state, federal, and public health guidance as it has evolved and will continue to do so. While we have had occasions under which it was advised that a staff member self-isolate for a period of time, we have had only one staff member ill with COVID-19. There was not a material impact on operations during the absence of this individual from work. For our remaining employees at Lost Creek, we have altered certain work and commuting arrangements, with additional suggested safety precautions. Because our final scheduled sale of 2020, in early April, was completed by book transfer (effectively a paper transaction), then-existing COVID-19 restrictions did not impede the transfer.
Lost Creek Property - Great Divide Basin, Wyoming
Since commencement of operations in 2013, we have captured 2,734,393 pounds of U3O8 at Lost Creek through December 31, 2020. As in recent years, controlled production operations continued at Lost Creek throughout 2020. The originally planned wells and HHs in MU1 and the first three HHs and the related wells in MU2 were available for operation through much of 2020, until we further reduced our production levels in Q3 2020.
We were contractually committed to sell 200,000 pounds of U3O8 during H1 2020, at an average price of approximately $42 per pound. We entered into agreements to purchase product for delivery into those contractual commitments. The average cost of the purchases was approximately $26 per pound. We delivered a portion of those 2020 contractual commitments (33,000 pounds) in Q1 and delivered the remaining amount (167,000 pounds) early in Q2. The Q2 sale completed our remaining term commitment obligations. There were no spot sales completed in 2020.
During 2020, 10,789 pounds of U3O8 were captured within the Lost Creek plant and 15,873 pounds U3O8 were packaged in drums. At December 31, 2020, inventory at the conversion facility was approximately 268,485 pounds. Subsequent to year-end, we delivered an additional shipment to the conversion facility. Currently, we have approximately 284,358 pounds in inventory at the conversion facility.
Lost Creek MU1 and MU2 have all appropriate operating permits. The main trunkline that services the first five MU2 HHs has been installed, and the entirety of MU2 has been fenced. In addition, during the most recent development program, approximately 45% of the required wells for HH2-4 have been drilled and cased. These earlier development activities in MU2 will allow for a quick ramp up of production once market fundamentals change.
Lost Creek Regulatory Proceedings
Subsequent to final approvals for initial operations at Lost Creek received in 2012-2013, we have made necessary additional filings for and received approvals for ongoing operations at Lost Creek (e.g., wellfield development; authorizations related to permitted new deep disposal wells; permits and authority for Class V wells). In 2014, we filed applications for amendment of all Lost Creek permits and licenses to include recovery from LC East operations. The BLM conducted a NEPA review of the applications and plan of operations. The NRC participated in this review as a cooperating agency. The BLM issued its Final Environmental Impact Statement and related Record of Decision for the LC East Project in Q1 2019. Having assumed responsibility for source material licenses in 2018, the State URP received and adopted the NRC’s review of the application for amendment of the Lost Creek license and is completing all necessary steps toward issuance. Additionally, a permit amendment requesting similar approvals to mine was submitted to the WDEQ. Approval will include an aquifer exemption. We anticipate that all major permits and authorizations for the LC East amendments should be complete in 2021 H2.
Shirley Basin Project
Our permitting and license applications to construct and operate at our Shirley Basin site are nearing completion. The applications contemplate construction of a full processing facility, providing greater construction and operating flexibility as may be suggested by market conditions. We anticipate the State processes to be complete, with necessary permits, licenses and authorizations received, in 2021 H1. The BLM has completed its review and granted approval of the project. Additionally, work is well underway on initial engineering evaluations, designs and studies for the development of Shirley Basin operations when market conditions warrant.
Trade Action, Working Group and Legislative Updates
As described above under Industry Updates and Trends, we pursued a trade action with the DOC in response to the challenges of uranium market conditions, primary among them imports to the U.S. emanating from state-sponsored producers in Russia, Kazakhstan, and Uzbekistan. The trade action was concluded in 2019 when, choosing to not take direct action on the Section 232 Report from DOC, President Trump established the Working Group and charged it with developing recommendations for reviving and expanding domestic uranium production as well as considering the condition of the rest of the nuclear fuel cycle. The Working Group Report was released in April 2020, with many strong recommendations in support of the uranium mining industry as well as other aspects of the nuclear fuel cycle. The replenishment of the existing AAFS uranium reserve and the establishment of a new national uranium reserve were among the recommendations. Initial funding of $75 million for the new uranium reserve was included in the December 2020 Omnibus Bill. Budget proposals coinciding with the Working Group report suggest that a ten-year $150 million annual budget item should be allocated for the national uranium reserve, with funding contemplated until 2030.
Corporate Organization and Financing Developments
SBA Paycheck Protection Program
In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, Congress enacted the CARES Act on March 27, 2020. Among other provisions, it created the Paycheck Protection Program (“PPP”) through the Small Business Administration (“SBA”). As an eligible borrower under the program, we secured two loans, one for each of our subsidiaries with U.S. payroll obligations. The combined loan amount of $0.9 million was received on April 16, 2020. The Flexibility Act, which became law on June 5, 2020, changed key provisions of the PPP, including maturity of the loans, deferral of loan payments, and forgiveness of PPP loans, with revisions being retroactive to the date of the CARES Act. We have applied for forgiveness of the full amount of the loans under the current provisions of the program, and we anticipate the loans will meet the requirements for full forgiveness.
Reductions in Force
Because of persistently challenged market conditions and delay in progressing any of the recommendations in the Working Group Report, we continued to implement additional cost reductions throughout 2020. In Q3, we proceeded with an additional reduction in force which included 11 employees at Lost Creek and in the Littleton office. We reduced staffing to minimum levels necessary to safely operate and maintain our facilities and to meet regulatory compliance. Certain employees were asked to change job responsibilities and additional cross-training has been completed. We have retained core operational personnel who possess critical knowledge necessary for the Company to ramp up when conditions warrant. This strategy preserves our ability to react promptly and efficiently to changing market conditions.
Amendment of State Bond Loan
In addition to other cost-cutting measures taken throughout 2020, we again worked with the State of Wyoming and the Board of County Commissioners of Sweetwater County to obtain an additional six-quarter deferral of principal payments on the Lost Creek State Bond Loan, with all approvals being obtained October 6, 2020. Interest payments will continue during the deferral period for principal payments. The next quarterly principal payment is due in October 2022 and the final payment will be due in October 2024.
Equity Financings
On August 4, 2020, we announced the closing of a $4.68 million registered direct offering of 9,000,000 common shares and accompanying one-half common share warrants to purchase up to 4,500,000 common shares, at a combined public offering price of $0.52 per common share and accompanying warrant, with gross proceeds to the Company of $4.68 million. After fees and expenses of $0.4 million, net proceeds to the Company of $4.3 million were received on August 4, 2020.
Subsequent to year-end, on February 4, 2021, we announced the closing of an underwritten public offering of 14,722,200 common shares and accompanying one-half common share warrants to purchase up to 7,361,100 common shares, at a combined public offering price of $0.90 per common share and accompanying warrant. The warrants have an exercise price of $1.35 per whole common share and will expire three years from the date of issuance. We also granted the underwriters a 30-day option to purchase up to an additional 2,208,330 common shares and warrants to purchase up to 1,104,165 common shares on the same terms, which was exercised in full prior to closing. Including the exercised option, we issued a total of 16,930,530 common shares and 16,930,530 warrants to purchase up to 8,465,265 common shares. The gross proceeds to the Company were approximately $15.2 million.
Off Take Sales Agreements
We completed all remaining deliveries into our off-take sales agreements with U.S. utilities in 2020 Q2.
Results of Operations
The following tables provide detailed financial information on our sales, cost of sales, gross profit and production and ending inventory as they relate to U3O8 pounds.
Reconciliation of Non-GAAP measures with US GAAP financial statement presentation
The U3O8 and cost per pound measures included in the following tables do not have a standardized meaning within US GAAP or a defined basis of calculation. These measures are used by management to assess business performance and determine production and pricing strategies. They may also be used by certain investors to evaluate performance. Where applicable, reconciliation of these measures to US GAAP financial statement presentation are included within the respective table.
Sales
Unit
U3O8 Sales Reconcilation (1)
Sales per financial statements
$000
$ 8,316
$ 32,255
$ 23,496
Disposal fees
$000
$ (16 )
$ (4 )
$ (43 )
U3O8 sales
$000
$ 8,300
$ 32,251
$ 23,453
U3O8 pounds sold
lb
200,000
665,000
480,000
U3O8 price per pound sold
$/lb
$ 41.50
$ 48.50
$ 48.86
U3O8 Sales by Product
U3O8 Sales
Produced
$000
$ -
$ 9,889
$ 238
Purchased
$000
$ 8,300
$ 22,362
$ 23,215
$000
$ 8,300
$ 32,251
$ 23,453
U3O8 Pounds Sold
Produced
lb
-
213,750
10,000
Purchased
lb
200,000
451,250
470,000
lb
200,000
665,000
480,000
U3O8 Price per Pounds Sold
Produced
$/lb
$ -
$ 46.26
$ 23.80
Purchased
$/lb
$ 41.50
$ 49.56
$ 49.39
$/lb
$ 41.50
$ 48.50
$ 48.86
Note:
1.
Sales per the financial statements include revenues from disposal fees received at Shirley Basin. The disposal fees do not relate to U3O8 pounds sold and are excluded from the U3O8 sales and U3O8 price per pound sold figures.
The Company delivers U3O8 to a conversion facility, where the product is stored until sold. When a sales delivery is made, the Company notifies the conversion facility with instructions for a title transfer to the customer. Revenue is recognized when the title transfer of the U3O8 is confirmed by the conversion facility.
Cost of Sales
Unit
U3O8 Cost of Sales Reconciliation (1)
Cost of sales per financial statements
$000
$ 12,968
$ 30,274
$ 12,203
Lower of cost or NRV adjustment
$000
$ (7,802 )
$ (10,264 )
$ (318 )
U3O8 cost of sales
$000
$ 5,166
$ 20,010
$ 11,885
U3O8 pounds sold
lb
200,000
665,000
480,000
U3O8 cost per pound sold
$/lb
$ 25.83
$ 30.09
$ 24.76
U3O8 Cost of Sales by Product
U3O8 Cost of Sales
Ad valorem and severance taxes
$000
$ 29
$ 82
$ 423
Wellfield cash costs
$000
$ 422
$ 882
$ 2,068
Wellfield non-cash costs
$000
$ 2,289
$ 2,445
$ 1,603
Plant cash costs
$000
$ 3,393
$ 4,395
$ 4,719
Plant non-cash costs
$000
$ 1,958
$ 1,954
$ 1,955
Distribution costs
$000
$ 1
$ 71
$ 136
Inventory change
$000
$ (8,092 )
$ (1,744 )
$ (10,495 )
Produced
$000
$ -
$ 8,085
$ 409
Purchased
$000
$ 5,166
$ 11,925
$ 11,476
$000
$ 5,166
$ 20,010
$ 11,885
U3O8 Pounds Sold
Produced
lb
-
213,750
10,000
Purchased
lb
200,000
451,250
470,000
lb
200,000
665,000
480,000
U3O8 Cost per Pound Sold
Produced
$/lb
$ -
$ 37.82
$ 40.90
Purchased
$/lb
$ 25.83
$ 26.43
$ 24.42
$/lb
$ 25.83
$ 30.09
$ 24.76
Note:
1.
Cost of sales per the financial statements include lower of cost or net realizable value (“NRV”) adjustments. The NRV adjustments do not relate to U3O8 pounds sold and are excluded from the U3O8 cost of sales and U3O8 cost per pound sold figures.
Cost of sales per the financial statements includes ad valorem and severance taxes related to the extraction of uranium, all costs of wellfield and plant operations including the related depreciation and amortization of capitalized assets, reclamation, and mineral property costs, plus product distribution costs. These costs are also used to value inventory. The resulting inventoried cost per pound is compared to the NRV of the product, which is based on the estimated sales price of the product, net of any remaining costs to finish the product. Any inventory value in excess of the NRV is charged to cost of sales per the financial statements. These NRV adjustments are excluded from the U3O8 cost of sales and U3O8 cost per pound sold figures because they relate to the pounds of U3O8 in ending inventory and do not relate to the pounds of U3O8 sold during the period.
Gross Profit
Unit
U3O8 Gross Profit by Cost Product
U3O8 Sales (see Sales Table)
Produced
$000
$ -
$ 9,889
$ 238
Purchased
$000
$ 8,300
$ 22,362
$ 23,215
$000
$ 8,300
$ 32,251
$ 23,453
U3O8 Cost of Sales (see Cost of Sales Table)
Produced
$000
$ -
$ 8,085
$ 409
Purchased
$000
$ 5,166
$ 11,925
$ 11,476
$000
$ 5,166
$ 20,010
$ 11,885
U3O8 Gross Profit
Produced
$000
$ -
$ 1,804
$ (171 )
Purchased
$000
$ 3,134
$ 10,437
$ 11,739
$000
$ 3,134
$ 12,241
$ 11,568
U3O8 Pounds Sold
Produced
lb
-
213,750
10,000
Purchased
lb
200,000
451,250
470,000
lb
200,000
665,000
480,000
U3O8 Gross Profit per Pound Sold
Produced
$/lb
$ -
$ 8.44
$ (17.10 )
Purchased
$/lb
$ 15.67
$ 23.13
$ 24.97
$/lb
$ 15.67
$ 18.41
$ 24.10
U3O8 Gross Profit Margin
Produced
%
0.0 %
18.2 %
-71.8 %
Purchased
%
37.8 %
46.7 %
50.6 %
%
37.8 %
38.0 %
49.3 %
The last produced inventory was sold in 2019 Q2. All sales in 2020 were from purchased inventory.
U3O8 Production and Ending Inventory
Unit
U3O8 Production
Pounds captured
lb
10,789
47,957
302,164
Pounds drummed
lb
15,873
50,794
286,357
Pounds shipped
lb
-
58,353
287,873
Pounds purchased
lb
200,000
500,000
470,000
U3O8 Ending Inventory
Pounds
In-process inventory
lb
5,396
9,134
Plant inventory
lb
15,873
-
7,559
Conversion inventory - produced
lb
219,735
220,053
375,803
Conversion inventory - purchased
lb
48,750
48,750
-
lb
284,661
274,199
392,496
Value
In-process inventory
$000
$ -
$ -
$ 160
Plant inventory
$000
$ 463
$ -
$ 345
Conversion inventory - produced
$000
$ 6,083
$ 6,250
$ 14,187
Conversion inventory - purchased
$000
$ 1,268
$ 1,176
$ -
$000
$ 7,814
$ 7,426
$ 14,692
Cost per Pound
In-process inventory
$/lb
$ -
$ -
$ 17.52
Plant inventory
$/lb
$ 29.17
$ -
$ 45.64
Conversion inventory - produced
$/lb
$ 27.68
$ 28.40
$ 37.75
Conversion inventory - purchased
$/lb
$ 26.01
$ 24.12
$ -
$/lb
$ 27.45
$ 27.08
$ 37.43
Produced conversion inventory detail:
Ad valorem and severance tax
$/lb
$ 0.75
$ 0.77
$ 1.52
Cash cost
$/lb
$ 17.50
$ 17.95
$ 23.85
Non-cash cost
$/lb
$ 9.43
$ 9.68
$ 12.38
$/lb
$ 27.68
$ 28.40
$ 37.75
During 2020, we took steps to further reduce production operations at Lost Creek and adjust to the continued depressed state of the uranium markets while we awaited the recommended relief from the Working Group and further positive developments in the uranium markets. As a result, production rates at Lost Creek declined during the year. Pounds captured decreased nearly 80 percent during the year and will remain low until a decision to ramp up is made. Pounds drummed decreased similarly. There were no shipments in 2020 as we accumulated enough product for the next shipment, which was made in January 2021.
At the end of the year, we had approximately 268,485 pounds of U3O8 at the conversion facility including 219,735 produced pounds at an average cost per pound of $27.68, and 48,750 purchased pounds at an average cost of $26.01 per pound. Including the January 2021 shipment, we have approximately 284,358 pounds of U3O8 at the conversion facility including 235,608 produced pounds.
Year Ended December 31, 2020 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2019
The following table summarizes the results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019:
(expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except per share and pound data)
Year ended
December 31,
Sales
8,316
32,255
Cost of sales
(12,968 )
(30,275 )
Gross profit (loss)
(4,652 )
1,980
Operating costs
(8,689 )
(10,258 )
Profit (loss) from operations
(13,341 )
(8,278 )
Net interest expense
(710 )
(668 )
Warrant mark to market gain
(680 )
Foreign exchange gain (loss)
(72 )
(28 )
Other income (expense)
Net income (loss)
(14,785 )
(8,418 )
Foreign currency translation adjustment
(16 )
Comprehensive income (loss)
(14,732 )
(8,434 )
Income (loss) per common share:
Basic
(0.09 )
(0.05 )
Diluted
(0.09 )
(0.05 )
U3O8 pounds sold
200,000
665,000
U3O8 price per pounds sold
41.50
48.50
U3O8 cost per pounds sold
25.83
30.09
U3O8 gross per pounds sold
15.67
18.41
Sales
We sold 200,000 pounds of U3O8 during 2020 at an average price of $41.50 per pound. We sold 665,000 pounds of U3O8 during 2019 at an average price of $48.50 per pound. The sales were all from term contracts.
Cost of Sales
Cost of sales per the financial statements includes ad valorem and severance taxes related to the extraction of uranium, all costs of wellfield and plant operations including the related depreciation and amortization of capitalized assets, reclamation, and mineral property costs, plus product distribution costs. These costs are also used to value inventory. The resulting inventoried cost per pound is compared to the NRV of the product, which is based on the estimated sales price of the product, net of any remaining costs to finish the product. Any inventory value in excess of the NRV is charged to cost of sales per the financial statements. These NRV adjustments are excluded from the U3O8 cost of sales and U3O8 cost per pound sold figures because they relate to the pounds of U3O8 in ending inventory and do not relate to the pounds of U3O8 sold during the period.
All sales in 2020 were from purchased product. The weighted average purchase price was $25.83 per pound as compared to $30.09 in 2019. In 2019, a portion of the product sold was from produced inventory and the cost per pound of the produced inventory was higher than the purchased inventory cost per pound, which led to a higher average cost per pound sold in 2019 as compared to 2020.
In 2020, cost of sales per the financial statements included $7.8 million in lower of cost or NRV adjustments compared to $10.3 million in 2019.
Gross Profit
The gross loss per the financial statements for 2020 was $4.7 million. After adding back the $7.8 million lower of cost or NRV adjustment, which included a significant portion of cash production costs, the gross profit related to U3O8 sales was $3.1 million, which represents a gross profit margin of approximately 38 percent. Gross profit excluding NRV adjustments of $10.3 million in 2019 represent a gross profit margin of approximately 38 percent.
Operating Costs
Operating costs include exploration and evaluation expense, development expense, general and administration expense, and accretion expense.
The following table summarizes the operating costs for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019:
Year ended December 31,
Operating Costs
Exploration and evaluation
1,816
2,476
Development
1,097
1,404
General and administration
5,200
5,801
Accretion
8,689
10,258
Total operating costs in 2020 and 2019 were $8.7 million and $10.3 million, respectively. The decrease in 2020 was primarily related to lower labor costs. In 2020, after considering uranium market conditions, and other factors including worldwide economic conditions and market reactions to COVID-19, our Board of Directors chose to not pay bonus awards for 2019 performance, which accounted for a significant portion of the labor variance.
Exploration and evaluation expense consists of labor and the associated costs of the exploration, evaluation, and regulatory departments, as well as land holding and exploration costs on properties that have not reached the development or operations stage. The $0.7 million decrease in 2020 is primarily due to the lower labor costs ($0.6 million) and lower rental expenses ($0.1 million), which resulted from relocating the Casper field office to a smaller, less expensive, office building and the end of a vehicle lease program.
Development expense includes costs incurred at the Lost Creek Project not directly attributable to production activities, including wellfield construction, drilling, and development costs. It also includes costs associated with the Shirley Basin Project, which is in a more advanced stage, and Lucky Mc, which is near the end of reclamation at the historic mine site. The $0.3 million decrease in 2020 primarily related to lower outside service costs at Lost Creek and Shirley Basin ($0.4 million), which resulted from decreased levels of development activity at both locations, partially offset by higher permitting costs at Shirley Basin ($0.1 million).
General and administration expense relates to the administration, finance, investor relations, land, and legal functions, and consists principally of personnel, facility, and support costs. The $0.6 million decrease in 2020 was primarily related to lower labor ($0.5 million) and lower outside professional fees ($0.2 million), which were partially offset by higher, non-cash, stock compensation costs ($0.1 million).
Other Income and Expenses
Net interest expense remained consistent during 2020 compared to the prior year. In October 2019, the State granted a six-quarter deferral of principal payments on the State Bond Loan, so the principal balance, and the resulting interest charge, did not change significantly.
The warrant mark to market decreased from a gain of $0.5 million in 2019 to a loss of $0.7 million in 2020. As a part of the September 2018 public offering and the August 2020 registered direct offering, we sold warrants that were priced in U.S. dollars. Because the functional currency of the Ur-Energy Inc. is Canadian dollars, a derivative financial liability was created. The liability was originally calculated, and is revalued quarterly, using the Black-Scholes technique as there is no active market for the warrants. Any gain or loss resulting from the revaluation of the liability is reflected in net income for the period.
Earnings (loss) per Common Share
The basic and diluted loss per common share for 2020 and 2019 were $0.09 and $0.05, respectively. The diluted loss per common share is equal to the basic loss per common share due to the anti-dilutive effect of all convertible securities in periods of loss.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
As of December 31, 2020, we had cash resources consisting of cash and cash equivalents of $4.3 million, a decrease of $3.1 million from the December 31, 2019 balance of $7.4 million. The cash resources consist of Canadian and U.S. dollar denominated deposit accounts and money market funds. We used $8.4 million for operating activities, used less than $0.1 million for investing activities, and generated $5.3 million from financing activities.
Operating activities used $8.4 million of cash in 2020. We collected $8.3 million from the sale of purchased U3O8. We spent $5.2 million to purchase the U3O8 we sold. We also spent $3.8 million on production related costs, however there were no sales of produced inventory during the year. Operating costs consumed $7.2 million of cash and we paid $0.7 million in interest payments on our state bond loan. Working capital and other items generated approximately $0.2 million of cash.
Investing activities during 2020 were minimal and primarily consisted of some early stage design work on an alternative, limited rejection water treatment system, which could significantly increase our wastewater disposal capacity. However, most of the costs were offset by proceeds from the sale of capital assets.
Financing activities provided $5.3 million of cash in 2020. As described below, we received $0.9 million of loan proceeds in April and raised $4.3 million after expenses through a public offering in August. In addition, we received $0.1 million from the exercise of stock options and $0.1 million for shares issued through the at market sales facility described below. Subsequent to December 31, 2020, the Company closed on February 4, 2021 a $15.2 million underwritten public offering as described below.
Wyoming State Bond Loan
On October 23, 2013, we closed a $34.0 million Sweetwater County, State of Wyoming, Taxable Industrial Development Revenue Bond financing program loan (“State Bond Loan”). The State Bond Loan calls for payments of interest at a fixed rate of 5.75% per annum on a quarterly basis, which commenced January 1, 2014. The principal was to be payable in 28 quarterly installments, which commenced January 1, 2015. The State Bond Loan is secured by all the assets at the Lost Creek Project. As of December 31, 2020, the balance of the State Bond Loan was $12.4 million.
On October 1, 2019, the Sweetwater County Commissioners and the State of Wyoming approved a six-quarter deferral of principal payments beginning October 1, 2019. On October 6, 2020, the State Bond Loan was again modified to defer principal payments for an additional eighteen months. Quarterly principal payments are scheduled to resume on October 1, 2022 and the last payment will be due on October 1, 2024.
Small Business Administration Loans
On April 16, 2020, we obtained two SBA PPP loans (one for each of our subsidiaries with U.S. payroll obligations) through the Bank of Oklahoma Financial (“BOKF”). The program was a part of the CARES Act enacted by Congress on March 27, 2020 in response to the COVID-19 (Coronavirus) pandemic. The combined loan amount was $0.9 million.
On June 5, 2020, the Flexibility Act became law. The Flexibility Act changes key provisions of the PPP, including maturity of the loans, deferral of loan payments, and the forgiveness of the PPP loans, with revisions being retroactive to the date of the CARES Act.
Under the SBA PPP loan program, as modified by the Flexibility Act, the repayment of our loans, including interest, may be forgiven based on eligible payroll, payroll-related, and other allowable costs incurred in a twenty-four-week period following the funding of the loans. We anticipate the loans will meet the requirements for forgiveness under this program. In December 2020, we applied for loan forgiveness, but we have not yet received loan forgiveness and therefore continue to treat the PPP loans as debt.
Universal Shelf Registration and At Market Facility
On May 15, 2020, we filed a universal shelf registration statement on Form S-3 with the SEC in order that we may offer and sell, from time to time, in one or more offerings, at prices and terms to be determined, up to $100 million of our Common Shares, warrants to purchase our Common Shares, our senior and subordinated debt securities, and rights to purchase our Common Shares and/or senior and subordinated debt securities. The registration statement became effective May 27, 2020 for a three-year period.
On May 29, 2020, we entered into an At Market Issuance Sales Agreement (the “Sales Agreement”) with B. Riley Securities, Inc. (formerly, B. Riley FBR, Inc.), under which we may, from time to time, issue and sell Common Shares at market prices on the NYSE American or other U.S. market through the agent for aggregate sales proceeds of up to $10,000,000. The Sales Agreement replaces the prior At Market Issuance Sales Agreement entered by the Company on May 27, 2016, as amended. In 2020 Q4, we utilized the Sales Agreement and received gross proceeds of $0.1 million.
2020 Registered Direct Offering
On August 4, 2020, the Company closed a $4.68 million registered direct offering of 9,000,000 common shares and accompanying one-half common share warrants to purchase up to 4,500,000 common shares, at a combined public offering price of $0.52 per common share and accompanying warrant, with gross proceeds to the Company of $4.68 million. After fees and expenses of $0.4 million, net proceeds to the Company were $4.3 million.
2021 Underwritten Public Offering
Subsequent to December 31, 2020, the Company closed on February 4, 2021 a $15.2 million underwritten public offering of 16,930,530 common shares and accompanying one-half common share warrants to purchase up to 8,465,265 common shares, at a combined public offering price of $0.90 per common share and accompanying one-half common share warrant. The gross proceeds to the Company from this offering were approximately $15.2 million, before deducting the underwriting discounts and commissions and other estimated offering expenses payable by the Company.
Liquidity Outlook
As of February 24, 2021, our unrestricted cash position was $18.6 million.
In addition to our cash position, our finished, ready-to-sell, conversion facility inventory, worth $8.0 million at recent spot prices, is immediately realizable, if necessary. After completing the 2021 underwritten public offering discussed above, we no longer anticipate selling our existing finished-product inventory in 2021 at spot market prices. As discussed below, we currently intend to preserve our U.S. origin pounds for possible delivery into the U.S. uranium reserve program, which has been signed into law but not yet implemented.
Looking Ahead
Following multiple announcements of industry production suspensions and reductions in 2020, U3O8 spot prices increased to $33 per pound, but subsequently decreased to approximately $30 per pound at year-end. More recently, recognition of nuclear power’s role in achieving net-zero carbon emissions goals has seen a renewed interest in the uranium sector. The Paris Climate Agreement calls for net-zero carbon emissions by 2050 and the U.S. has rejoined the agreement under the Biden Administration, which has indicated support for the nuclear industry.
In February 2021, we raised gross proceeds of $15.2 million through an underwritten public offering. Our current cash position as of February 24, 2021, is $18.6 million. In addition to our strong cash position, we have nearly 285,000 pounds of finished, ready-to-sell inventory, worth $8.0 million at recent spot prices. The financing provides us adequate funds to maintain and enhance operational readiness, for possible future acquisitions, and for general working capital purposes, including the preservation of our existing inventory for higher prices.
In addition to the restructuring of the State Bond Loan, we implemented other Company-wide cost-saving measures during 2020. We further reduced production operations at Lost Creek to market-appropriate levels. The reduced production levels allowed us to make further operating cost reductions at Lost Creek and related support cost reductions at the corporate office. The cost reductions include savings from additional reductions in force and other cost containment measures. Together with the further deferral of principal payments on the State Bond Loan, these measures will result in substantial savings to the Company, estimated to exceed $7 million and $4 million in calendar years 2021 and 2022, respectively.
Our remaining highly experienced technical and operational staff will continue to optimize processes and refine production plans, which strengthens our operational readiness at the fully permitted Lost Creek mine and plant. The Lost Creek facility has the constructed and licensed capacity to process up to two million pounds of U3O8 per year and previously reported mineral resources to feed the processing plant for many years to come. A ramp-up of production at Lost Creek would initially include further development work in the first two mine units, followed by the ten additional mining areas as defined in the Lost Creek Property Preliminary Economic Assessment, as amended. In 2021, we expect to receive all permits and authorizations to recover uranium from the adjacent LC East project where certain of those additional mining areas are located.
We remain prepared to expand uranium production at Lost Creek to an annualized run rate of one million pounds. With future development and construction in mind, our current staff members were retained as having the greatest level of experience and adaptability allowing for an easier transition back to full operations. Lost Creek operations can increase to full production rates in as little as six months following a go decision, simply by developing additional header houses within the fully permitted MU2. Development expenses during this six-month ramp up period are estimated to be approximately $14 million and are almost entirely related to MU2 drilling and header house construction costs. We are prepared to ramp up and to deliver our Lost Creek production inventory to the new national uranium reserve.
Additionally, we stand ready to construct our Shirley Basin mine, where we estimate up to nine years production based upon the mineral resources reported in the Shirley Basin Preliminary Economic Assessment. All remaining permits and authorizations to construct and operate this in situ recovery site are expected to be received in 2021 H1.
We will continue to closely monitor the uranium market and any actions or remedies resulting from the Working Group’s report, the implementation of the uranium reserve program, or any further legislative actions, which may positively impact the uranium production industry. Until such time, we will continue to minimize costs and maximize the ‘runway’ to maintain our current operations and the operational readiness needed to ramp-up production when called upon.
Table of Contractual Obligations
The following table summarizes our contractual obligations as of December 31, 2020:
Payments due
<1
1 to 3
3 to 5
>5
Total
Year
Years
Years
Years
Notes payable
13,341
12,844
-
-
Interest on notes payable
1,999
1,275
-
-
Operating leases
-
-
Environmental remediation
-
-
-
Asset retirement obligations
29,965
-
-
-
29,965
45,431
1,346
14,120
-
29,965
Outstanding Share Data
As of December 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019, the Company’s capital consisted of the following:
December 31, 2020
December 31, 2019
Common shares
170,253,752
160,478,059
Shares issuable upon the exercise of:
Stock options
11,910,424
11,076,583
Restricted share units
1,404,962
1,155,928
Warrants
11,031,439
6,531,439
194,600,577
179,242,009
Off Balance Sheet Arrangements
We have not entered any material off balance sheet arrangements such as guaranteed contracts, contingent interests in assets transferred to unconsolidated entities, derivative instrument obligations, or with respect to any obligations under a variable interest entity arrangement.
Financial Instruments and Other Instruments
The Company’s cash and cash equivalents are composed of:
Cash and cash equivalent
December 31, 2020
December 31, 2019
Cash on deposit
1,406
Money market funds
3,416
5,997
4,268
7,403
Quarterly financial data (unaudited and in thousands except per share data)
Quarter Ended
12/31
9/30
6/30
3/31
12/31
9/30
6/30
3/31
Sales
-
6,934
1,370
10,849
5,115
11,479
4,812
Net income (loss)
(5,221 )
(3,696 )
(2,227 )
(3,641 )
2,115
(4,200 )
(2,031 )
(4,302 )
Income (loss) per common share:
Basic
(0.03 )
(0.02 )
(0.02 )
(0.02 )
0.02
(0.03 )
(0.01 )
(0.03 )
Diluted
(0.03 )
(0.02 )
(0.02 )
(0.02 )
0.02
(0.03 )
(0.01 )
(0.03 )
Credit risk
Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist of cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash. These assets include Canadian dollar and U.S. dollar denominated certificates of deposit, money market accounts, and demand deposits. These instruments are maintained at financial institutions in Canada and the U.S. Of the amount held on deposit, approximately $0.5 million is covered by the Canada Deposit Insurance Corporation, the Securities Investor Protection Corporation, or the U.S. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, leaving approximately $11.6 million at risk on December 31, 2020 should the financial institutions with which these amounts are invested be rendered insolvent. The Company does not consider any of its financial assets to be impaired as of December 31, 2020.
Liquidity risk
Liquidity risk is the risk that the Company will not be able to meet its financial obligations as they come due.
As of December 31, 2020, the Company’s financial liabilities consisted of accounts payable and accrued liabilities of $2.3 million, and the current portion of notes payable of $0.5 million.

---

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Item 7A. Quantitative AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Market risk
Market risk is the risk to the Company of adverse financial impact due to changes in the fair value or future cash flows of financial instruments because of fluctuations in interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates.
Interest rate risk
Financial instruments that expose the Company to interest rate risk are its cash equivalents, deposits, restricted cash, and debt financings. Our objectives for managing our cash and cash equivalents are to always maintain sufficient funds on hand to meet day-to-day requirements and to place any amounts that are considered more than day-to-day requirements on short-term deposit with the Company's financial institutions to earn interest.
Currency risk
We maintain a balance of less than $0.2 million in foreign currency resulting in a low currency risk.
Commodity Price Risk
The Company is subject to market risk related to the market price of uranium. Future sales would be impacted by both spot and long-term uranium price fluctuations. Historically, uranium prices have been subject to fluctuation, and the price of uranium has been and will continue to be affected by numerous factors beyond our control, including the demand for nuclear power, political and economic conditions, and governmental legislation in uranium producing and consuming countries and production levels and costs of production of other producing companies. The average spot market price was $28.23 per pound as of February 24, 2021.
Transactions with Related Parties
During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020, we did not participate in any reportable transactions with related parties.
Proposed Transactions
As is typical of the mineral exploration and development industry, we will consider and review potential merger, acquisition, investment and venture transactions and opportunities that could enhance shareholder value.
New accounting pronouncements which were implemented this year
None.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
We have established the existence of mineral resources at the Lost Creek Project, but because of the unique nature of in situ recovery mines, we have not established, and have no plans to establish the existence of proven and probable reserves at this project.
Mineral Properties
Acquisition costs of mineral properties are capitalized. When production is attained at a property, these costs will be amortized over a period of estimated benefit. Until production is attained at a property, the costs will be carried at their acquisition cost.
As of December 31, 2020, the current and long-term prices of uranium were $30.20 and $35.00, respectively. This compares to prices of $24.93 and $32.50 as of December 31, 2019. Senior management updates production, sales, and cash projections on a regular basis, in some cases weekly, but at least monthly. The Company reviews the impairment indicators outlined in US GAAP guidance.
Development costs including, but not limited to, production wells, header houses, piping and power will be expensed as incurred as we have no proven and probable reserves.
Exploration, Evaluation, and Development Costs
Exploration and evaluation expenses consist of labor, annual exploration lease and maintenance fees and associated costs of the exploration geology department as well as land holding and exploration costs including drilling and analysis on properties which have not reached the permitting or operations stage. Development expense relates to the Company’s Lost Creek, LC East and Shirley Basin projects, which are more advanced in terms of permitting and preliminary economic assessments. Development expenses include all costs associated with exploring, delineating, and permitting new or expanded mine units, the costs associated with the construction and development of permitted mine units including wells, pumps, piping, header houses, roads and other infrastructure related to the preparation of a mine unit to begin extraction operations as well as the cost of drilling and completing disposal wells.
Capital Assets
Property, plant, and equipment assets, including machinery, processing equipment, enclosures, vehicles, and expenditures that extend the life of such assets, are recorded at cost including acquisition and installation costs. The enclosure costs include both the building housing and the processing equipment necessary for the extraction of uranium from impregnated water pumped in from the wellfield to the packaging of uranium yellowcake for delivery into sales. These enclosure costs are combined as the equipment and related installation associated with the equipment is an integral part of the structure itself. The costs of self-constructed assets include direct construction costs, direct overhead, and allocated interest during the construction phase. Depreciation is calculated using a declining balance method for most assets except for the plant enclosure and related equipment. Depreciation on the plant enclosure and related equipment is calculated on a straight-line basis. Estimated lives for depreciation purposes range from three years for computer equipment and software to 20 years for the plant enclosure and the name plate life of the related equipment.
Depreciation
The depreciable life of the Lost Creek plant, equipment, and enclosure was determined to be the nameplate life of the equipment housed in the processing plant as plans exist to continue to process materials from other sources, such as Shirley Basin, beyond the estimated production at the Lost Creek Project.
Inventory and Cost of Sales
Our inventories are measured at the lower of cost or net realizable value based on projected revenues from the sale of that product. We are allocating all costs of operations of the Lost Creek facility to the inventory valuation at various stages of production except for wellfield construction and disposal well costs which are treated as development expenses when incurred. Depreciation of facility enclosures, equipment, and asset retirement obligations as well as amortization of the acquisition cost of the related property is also included in the inventory valuation. We do not allocate any administrative or other overhead to the cost of the product.
Because of the nature of in situ operations, it is not technically feasible to accurately measure the amount of in-process inventory at any given time. We use a combination of calculating estimated uranium captured per sampling event applied to total water processing flow to determine the estimated pounds captured.
Asset Retirement Obligations
For mining properties, various federal and state mining laws and regulations require the Company to reclaim the surface areas and restore groundwater quality to the pre-existing quality or class of use after the completion of mining. The Company records the fair value of an asset retirement obligation as a liability in the period in which it incurs an obligation associated with the retirement of tangible long-lived assets that result from the acquisition, construction, development and/or normal use of the assets.
Asset retirement obligations consist of estimated final well closures, plant closure and removal and associated reclamation and restoration costs to be incurred by the Company in the future. The estimated fair value of the asset retirement obligation is based on the current cost escalated at an inflation rate and discounted at a credit adjusted risk-free rate. This liability is capitalized as part of the cost of the related asset and amortized over its remaining productive life. The liability accretes until the Company settles the obligation.
Share-Based Compensation
We are required to initially record all equity instruments including warrants, restricted share units and stock options at fair value in the financial statements.
Management utilizes the Black-Scholes model to calculate the fair value of the warrants and stock options at the time they are issued. Use of the Black-Scholes model requires management to make estimates regarding the expected volatility of the Company’s stock over the future life of the equity instrument, the estimate of the expected life of the equity instrument and the number of options that are expected to be forfeited. Determination of these estimates requires significant judgment and requires management to formulate estimates of future events based on a limited history of actual results.
Income taxes
The Company accounts for income taxes under the asset and liability method which requires the recognition of future income tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between the carrying amounts and tax bases of assets and liabilities. The Company provides a valuation allowance on future tax assets unless it is more likely than not that such assets will be realized.

---

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
Item 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
See Consolidated Financial Statements following the signature page of this Form 10-K.

---

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS
Item 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.

---

ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures
(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
As of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020, under the supervision of the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, the Company evaluated the effectiveness of its disclosure controls and procedures, as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and Rule 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”). Based on this evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer have concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information the Company is required to disclose in reports that are filed or submitted under the Exchange Act: (1) is recorded, processed and summarized effectively and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms, and (2) is accumulated and communicated to Company management, including the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. The Company’s disclosure controls and procedures include components of internal control over financial reporting. No matter how well designed and operated, internal controls over financial reporting can provide only reasonable, but not absolute, assurance that the control system's objectives will be met.
(b) Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the Company’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f). The Company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with US GAAP.
All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation. Because of the inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
As of December 31, 2020, management assessed the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting based on the criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Based on its assessment using those criteria, management concluded that the Company maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2020.
(c) Attestation Report of Registered Public Accounting Firm
This Annual Report does not include an attestation report of the company’s registered public accounting firm regarding internal controls over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by our registered public accounting firm pursuant to law, rules and regulations that permit us to provide only management’s report in this Annual Report.
(d) Changes in Internal Controls over Financial Reporting
No changes in our internal control over financial reporting occurred during the year ended December 31, 2020 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

---

ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 9B. Other Information
None.
PART III

---

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Item 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Information relating to this item will be included in an amendment to this report or in the proxy statement for our 2021 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and is incorporated by reference in this report.
Code of Ethics
We have adopted a Code of Ethics (“Code”) which applies to all employees, officers, and directors. The full text of the Code is available on our website at http://www.ur-energy.com/corporate-governance/. We will post any amendments to, or waivers from, the Code on our corporate website or by filing a Current Report on Form 8-K.

---

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Item 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Information relating to this item will be included in an amendment to this report or in the proxy statement for our 2021 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and is incorporated by reference in this report.

---

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS
Item 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF Certain BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
Information relating to this item will be included in an amendment to this report or in the proxy statement for our 2021 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and is incorporated by reference in this report.

---

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
Item 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
Information relating to this item will be included in an amendment to this report or in the proxy statement for our 2021 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and is incorporated by reference in this report.

---

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES
Item 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTing FEES AND SERVICES
Information relating to this item will be included in an amendment to this report or in the proxy statement for our 2021 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and is incorporated by reference in this report.
PART IV

---

ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
Financial Statements and Financial Statement Schedules
See “Index to Consolidated financial statements” on page.
Incorporated by Reference
Exhibit Number
Exhibit Description
Form
Date of Report
Exhibit
Filed Herewith
1.1
Underwriting Agreement with Cantor Fitzgerald, as representative for the underwriters named therein, dated September 21, 2018
8-K
9/25/2018
1.1
1.2
Form of Securities Purchase Agreement dated July 31, 2020, among Ur-Energy Inc. and purchasers named therein
8-K
8/4/2020
10.1
3.1
Articles of Continuance and Articles of Amendment
S-3
1/10/2016
3.1
3.2
Amended By-Law No. 1
S-3
1/10/2016
3.2
3.3
By-Law No. 2 (Advance Notice)
8-K
2/25/2018
3.1
4.1
Warrant Agreement, dated September 25, 2018, between the Company and Computershare Trust Company, N.A.
8-K
9/25/2018
4.1
4.2
Description of Registrant Securities
10-K
2/28/2020
4.2
4.3
Form of Warrant Certificate
8-K
8/4/2020
4.1
10.1
Financing Agreement and Mortgage (State of Wyoming Industrial Revenue Bond Loan)
6-K
10/29/2013
99.1
10.2
Share Purchase Agreement and Registration Rights Agreement (Private Placement)
6-K
12/19/2013
10.3
Employment Agreement with Jeffrey T. Klenda, as amended
10-K
3/3/2015
10.7
10.4
Employment Agreement with Roger L. Smith, as amended
10-K
3/3/2015
10.9
10.5
Employment Agreement with Steven M. Hatten, as amended
10-K
3/3/2015
10.10
10.6
Employment Agreement with John W. Cash, as amended
10-K
3/3/2015
10.11
10.7
Employment Agreement with Penne A. Goplerud, as amended
10-K
3/3/2015
10.12
10.8
Ur-Energy Inc. Amended and Restated Stock Option Plan
8-K
4/13/17
4.1
10.9
Amended Restricted Share Unit Plan
8-K
3/27/2016
10.1
10.11
At Market Issuance Sales Agreement
8-K
5/29/2020
1.1
10.12
Amendment to Financing Agreement and Third Amendment to Mortgage
X
10.14
Ur-Energy USA Inc. SBA Payroll Protection Program Promissory Note
10-Q
5/8/2020
10.14
10.15
Lost Creek ISR, LLC SBA Payroll Protection Program Promissory Note
10-Q
5/8/2020
10.15
10.16
Amendment to Employment Agreement with Jeffrey T. Klenda
10/28/2020
X
10/17
Amendment to Employment Agreement with Roger L. Smith
12/10/2020
X
10/18
Amendment to Employment Agreement with Steven M. Hatten
12/10/2020
X
10.19
Amendment to Employment Agreement with John W. Cash
12/10/2020
X
10.20
Amendment to Employment Agreement with Penne A. Goplerud
12/10/2020
X
14.1
Code of Ethics for CEO, CFO and Senior Financial Officers
8-K
2/11/2015
14.1
21.1
Subsidiaries of the Registrant
X
23.1
Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
X
23.2
Consent of TREC, Inc.
X
23.3
Consent of WWC Engineering
X
31.1
Certification of CEO Pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
X
31.2
Certification of CFO Pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
X
32.1
Certification of CEO Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
X
32.2
Certification of CFO Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
X
101.INS
XBRL Instance Document
X
101.SCH
XBRL Schema Document
X
101.CAL
XBRL Calculation Linkbase Document
X
101.DEF
XBRL Definition Linkbase Document
X
101.LAB
XBRL Labels Linkbase Document
X
101.PRE
XBRL Presentation Linkbase Document
X
99.1
Location maps (1)
10-K
3/3/2015
(1) Filed herewith under Items 1 and 2. Business and Properties.