EDGAR 10-K Filing

Company CIK: 1539850
Filing Year: 2025
Filename: 1539850_10-K_2025_0001641172-25-005354.json

---

ITEM 1. BUSINESS
Item 1. Business
Starco Brands, Inc. (formerly Insynergy Products, Inc.), which we refer to as “the Company,” “our Company,” “STCB”, “we,” “us” or “our,” was incorporated in the State of Nevada on January 26, 2010 under the name Insynergy, Inc. On September 7, 2017, the Company filed an Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation to change the corporate name to Starco Brands, Inc. The Board of Directors (“Board”) determined the change of the Company’s name was in the best interests of the Company due to changes in our current and anticipated business operations at that time. In July 2017, the Company entered into a licensing agreement with The Starco Group (“TSG”), a related party entity, located in Los Angeles, California. TSG is a private label and branded aerosol and liquid fill manufacturer with manufacturing assets in the following verticals: DIY/Hardware, paints, coatings and adhesives, household, hair care, disinfectants, automotive, motorcycle, arts & crafts, personal care cosmetics, personal care FDA, sun care, food, cooking oils, beverages, and spirits and wine. Upon entering into the licensing agreement with TSG, the Company pivoted to commercializing novel consumer products manufactured by TSG.
In 2022 and 2023, the Company embarked on a strategy to grow its consumer product line offerings through the acquisition of multiple subsidiaries with established behavior changing products and brands. With an increased product line and its existing partner relationships, the Company has continued expanding its vertical and consumer base.
Executive Overview
In July 2017, our Board entered into a licensing agreement with TSG to pursue a new strategic marketing plan involving commercializing leading edge products with the intent to sell them through brick and mortar and online retailers. We are a company with a mission to create behavior-changing products and brands. Our core competency is inventing brands, marketing, building trends, pushing awareness and social marketing. The licensing agreement with TSG provided STCB with certain products on an exclusive and royalty-free basis and other products on a non-exclusive and royalty basis, in the categories of food, household cleaning, air care, spirits and personal care.
The current CEO and owner of TSG, Ross Sklar, was named the CEO of STCB in August of 2017. Mr. Sklar has spent his career commercializing technology in industrial and consumer markets. Mr. Sklar has built teams of manufacturing personnel, research and development, and sales and marketing professionals over the last 20 years and has grown TSG into a successful and diversified manufacturer supplying a wide range of products to some of the largest retailers in the United States. As the Company continues to grow the number of products and brands under the STCB umbrella, it will continue to leverage its relationship with TSG to streamline its product manufacturing.
Product Development
We have conducted extensive research and have identified specific channels to penetrate with a portfolio of novel technologies. We are executing on this vision and, since our inception, have launched and /or served as the marketer of record for various product lines.
Winona®
STCB is the marketer of record, but not the owner of record for the Winona® Butter Flavor Popcorn Spray. STCB provides marketing services for Winona pursuant to a licensing agreement. Winona Popcorn Spray is sold in Walmart and H-E-B grocery stores, among other retailers. STCB also launched the Winona Popcorn Spray on Amazon through our strategic partner Pattern (formally iServe), who is a stockholder in STCB. Sales grew in 2024, and the Company expects sales to continue to grow in this space as management increased the Company’s sales personnel in 2024 for this product line.
Whipshots®
In December 2021, the Company launched a new product line consisting of vodka-infused, whipped-cream aerosols, under the brand name “Whipshots.” The launch event was held at Art Basel in Miami and garnered over 1 billion impressions world-wide. The Company launched the product on whipshots.com with a limited quantity of cans to be sold each day for the month of December. Whipshots® sold out every single day of the month. The Company launched brick and mortar retail distribution in the first quarter of 2022, signed a distribution agreement with Republic National Distributing Company (“RNDC”), one of the largest spirits distributors in the nation, and signed distribution agreements with others. Whipshots® is currently distributed in 47 of 50 states and the United Kingdom. Initially the Company introduced three flavors of Whipshots® to the market - Vanilla, Mocha and Caramel. Since the initial launch, the Company has introduced new and Limited Time flavors such as Peppermint, Lime, Pumpkin Spice, Strawberry and King Cake. We plan to continue to offer various additional Limited Time flavors over time. Whipshots® is produced by Temperance Distilling Company (“Temperance”), where Sklar is a majority shareholder.
Whipshots® and Whipshotz® Trademarks
On September 8, 2021, Whipshots LLC, a Wyoming limited liability company (“Whipshots LLC”), a subsidiary of the Company, entered into an Intellectual Property Purchase Agreement, effective August 24, 2021, with Penguins Fly, LLC, a Pennsylvania limited liability company (“Seller”). The agreement provided that the Seller would sell the trademarks “Whipshotz” and “Whipshots”, the accompanying domain and social media handles of the same nomenclature, and certain intellectual property, documents, digital assets, customer data and other transferable rights under non-disclosure, non-compete, non-solicitation and confidentiality contracts benefiting the purchased intellectual property and documents (collectively, the “Acquired Assets”) to Whipshots LLC. The purchase price for the Acquired Assets will be payable to Seller, over the course of seven years, based on a sliding scale percentage of gross revenues actually received by us solely from our sale of Whipshots/Whipshotz Products. The payments are subject to a minimum amount in each contract year and a maximum aggregate amount.
Whipshots® Licensing/Marketing
On September 14, 2021, Whipshots Holdings, LLC (formerly Whipshots, LLC), a subsidiary of the Company, a Delaware limited liability company (“Whipshots Holdings”), entered into a License Agreement (the “Washpoppin License Agreement”) with Washpoppin Inc., a New York corporation (“Washpoppin”). Pursuant to the Washpoppin License Agreement, Washpoppin licensed certain Licensed Property (as defined therein) of the recording artist professionally known as “Cardi B” (the “Artist”) to us. Whipshots Holdings and Washpoppin entered into an amended and restated Washpoppin License Agreement (“A&R Washpoppin License Agreement”), with an effective date of November 27, 2023.
As part of the A&R Washpoppin License Agreement, in exchange for royalty rates based on Net Sales (as defined therein) during each applicable contract period, the Company granted Whipshots Holdings shares to Washpoppin to cause the Artist to attend certain in person events, media interviews, participate in the development of the Licensed Products (as defined therein), and promote the Licensed Products through social media posts on the Artist’s social media platforms. We have committed a minimum royalty payment under the A&R Washpoppin License Agreement of an aggregate of $3,300,000 through 2024, subject to Washpoppin’s satisfaction of its obligations.
The Art of Sport® and AOS®
On September 12, 2022, STCB, through its wholly-owned subsidiary Starco Merger Sub Inc. (“Merger Sub”), completed its acquisition (the “AOS Acquisition”) of The AOS Group Inc., a Delaware corporation (“AOS”). The AOS Acquisition consisted of Merger Sub merging with and into AOS, with AOS being the surviving corporation. AOS® is a wholly-owned subsidiary of STCB. AOS® is the maker of Art of Sport® premium body and skincare products engineered to power and protect athletes and brings over the counter respiratory, sun care, women and children, pain management, performance supplements, food, beverage and apparel product lines under STCB auspices.
Skylar®
On December 29, 2022, STCB, through its wholly-owned subsidiary Starco Merger Sub II, Inc. (“Merger Sub II”), completed its acquisition (the “Skylar Acquisition”) of Skylar Body, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Skylar Inc.”) through the merger of Merger Sub II with and into Skylar Inc. Immediately following the Skylar Acquisition Skylar Inc. merged with and into Skylar Body, LLC (“Skylar”) a wholly-owned subsidiary of STCB, with Skylar as the surviving entity. Skylar® is a wholly-owned subsidiary of STCB. Skylar® is the maker of fragrances that are hypoallergenic and safe for sensitive skin.
Soylent®
On February 15, 2023, STCB, through its wholly-owned subsidiary Starco Merger Sub I, Inc. (“Merger Sub I”), completed its acquisition (the “Soylent Acquisition”) of Soylent Nutrition, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Soylent”). The Soylent Acquisition consisted of Merger Sub I merging with and into Soylent, with Soylent being the surviving corporation. Soylent® is a wholly-owned subsidiary of STCB. Soylent® is the maker of a wide range of plant-based “complete nutrition” and “functional food” products with a lineup of plant-based convenience shakes, powders and bars that contain proteins, healthy fats, functional amino acids and essential nutrients.
Distribution Agreements
In November of 2021, we entered into separate Distribution Agreements (each a “Distribution Agreement” and, collectively, the “Distribution Agreements”) with each of (i) National Distributing Company, Inc., a Georgia corporation, (ii) Republic National Distributing Company, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, and (iii) Young’s Market Company, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (each a “Distributor” and, collectively, the “Distributors”) each with an effective date as of November 1, 2021. Pursuant to the Distribution Agreements, the Distributors will act as the exclusive distributor for STCB in the Territories set forth on Exhibit B for the Products set forth on Exhibit A, to each such Distribution Agreement, as amended from time to time. The Distribution Agreements cover 47 U.S. States and the District of Columbia.
Pursuant to the terms of the Distribution Agreements, the Distributors serve as the exclusive distributors in such Territories for Whipshots®. The Distribution Agreements provide the Distributors rights to expand the Territories and Products covered under each such Distribution Agreement as we expand our product lines and distribution channels. The expansion of Territories and Products may be exercised under various rights, including rights of first refusal to serve as an exclusive distributor of new Products in new Territories. The Company has also agreed to grant the Distributors “most favored nations” pricing providing for the lowest price available across the United States and its territories and possessions (the “US Territory”), and to grant Distributors any volume or other discounts that are offered to any other distributor in the US Territory by us, provided such action is not a violation of applicable law.
Broker Agreements
In November of 2021, we entered into separate Broker Agreements (each a “Broker Agreement” and, collectively, the “Broker Agreements”) with both Republic National Distributing Company, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, and Young’s Market Company, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (each a “Broker” and, collectively, the “Brokers”) each with an effective date as of November 1, 2021. Pursuant to the Broker Agreements, the Broker acts as the exclusive broker for us in the Territories set forth on Exhibit B for the Products set forth on Exhibit A, to each such Broker Agreement, as amended from time to time. Each Broker will receive a commission rate of 10%. The foregoing Broker Agreements now cover 9 U.S. States.
Competition
The household, personal care and beverage consumer products market in the U.S. is mature and highly competitive. Our competitive set has grown with our recent acquisitions and consists of consumer products companies, including large and well-established multinational companies as well as smaller regional and local companies. These competitors include Johnson & Johnson, The Procter & Gamble Company, Unilever, Diageo, CytoSport, Inc., Abbott Nutrition, Nestlé, Owyn, Clean Reserve, The 7 Virtues and others. Within each product category, most of our products compete with other widely advertised brands and store brand products.
Competition in our product categories is based on a number of factors including price, quality and brand recognition. We benefit from the strength of our brands, a differentiated portfolio of quality branded and store brand products, as well as significant capital investment in our manufacturing facilities. We believe the strong recognition of the Whipshots® and Soylent® brands among U.S. consumers, along with the growing brand recognition of Skylar®, gives us a competitive advantage.
Growth Strategy
As long as the Company can raise capital, the Company plans to launch other products in spray foods and condiments, over the counter respiratory, air care, skin care, sun care, hair care, personal care, pain management, performance supplements, plant-based convenience shakes, powders and bars, apparel, fragrances, spirits and beverages over the next 36 months. Financing growth and launching of new products through our key subsidiaries is key to the Company’s ability to raise further capital.
We will need to rely on sales of our Class A common stock and other sources of financing to raise additional capital. The purchasers and manner of any share issuance will be determined according to our financial needs and the available exemptions to the registration requirements of the Securities Act. This provides significant support for our current retail and online distribution. We also plan to raise capital in the future through a compliant offering.
We remain committed to establishing ourselves as a premier brand owner and third-party marketer of innovative, cutting-edge technologies within the consumer products marketplace, with the ultimate goal of driving success and enhancing stockholder value. The Company will continue to evaluate its opportunities to further set the strategy for 2025 and beyond.
For more information and to view our products, you may visit our websites at www.starcobrands.com, www.whipshots.com, www.winonapure.com, www.artofsport.com, www.skylar.com and www.soylent.com.
Offices
Our principal executive offices are located at 706 N Citrus Avenue, Los Angeles, California, 90038, and our telephone number is (323) 266-7111. Our website is www.starcobrands.com and the Company makes its SEC reports available on the website. Our internet website and the information contained therein or connected thereto are not intended to be incorporated by reference into this Annual Report.
Employees
STCB and its subsidiaries had 29 full-time employees at the end of 2024 and used independent contractors, consultants and contributed services from related parties on an as needed basis.

---

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
Item 1A. Risk Factors
We are a smaller reporting company as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and, as such, are not required to provide the information under this Item; however, we have chosen to include the following risk factors.
The Company is still subject to all the same risks that all companies in its business, and all companies in the economy, are exposed to. These include risks relating to economic downturns, political and economic events, pandemics and government lockdowns and technological developments (such as cyber-attacks and the ability to prevent those attacks). Additionally, early-stage companies are inherently more risky than more developed companies. You should consider general risks as well as specific risks when deciding whether to invest.
Risks Related to Our Company and its Business
We are reliant on related parties for some of our revenues, manufacturing certain of our products, and much of our administrative activities.
Starco Brands uses independent contractors and consultants, and contributed services from related parties on an as needed basis for some administration of Company operations. As set forth in these Risk Factors, some of our revenues and manufacturing depend on the operations of related parties.
We are highly dependent on the services of Ross Sklar, our Chief Executive Officer.
We are highly dependent on the services of Ross Sklar, our Chief Executive Officer. Although Mr. Sklar spends significant time with the Company and is highly active in our management, he does not devote his full time and attention to the Company. Mr. Sklar currently serves as a Chief Executive Officer of TSG and a Chairman of Temperance, among other positions and activities.
In certain voting situations, including the election of our directors, we are effectively controlled by Ross Sklar. As a result, Mr. Sklar has the ability to prevent or influence certain actions by us.
As of April 16, 2025, Mr. Sklar beneficially controls, directly or indirectly, the voting power of up to 484,608,472 shares of the Company’s Class A common stock representing up to 75.1 % of the outstanding voting power of the Class A common stock, with respect to the election of up to 4 of 7 directors to our Board. Mr. Sklar may exercise control over approximately 220,658,559 shares, or 34.2 % of the total voting power of STCB pursuant to certain stockholder actions as described in the respective voting agreements.
As a result of his stock ownership and various voting agreements, Mr. Sklar can exercise significant control and influence over our business, including many matters requiring stockholder approval (e.g., election of certain directors, and significant corporate transactions, such as a merger or other sale of our Company or its securities or assets).
We rely on related parties and our business could be adversely affected if relationships with such related parties change, are terminated, or are not renewed.
Some of the Company’s products are dependent on The Starco Group which is owned by our CEO, Ross Sklar. There is no assurance that TSG will produce, supply or distribute sufficient quantities of those products needed by the Company. Difficulties in developing alternative sources of supply, if required, or failure of TSG to provide the products to the Company could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition, and result of operations.
We have incurred significant net losses and have only occasionally generated profits. We cannot assure you that we will continue to achieve profitable operations.
We have historically incurred significant net losses since inception. We incurred a net loss of $17,334,549 in the year ended December 31, 2024, incurred a net loss of $46,402,121 in the year ended December 31, 2023, generated net income of $977,858 in the year ended December 31, 2022, incurred a net loss of $2,325,074 in the year ended December 31, 2021 and generated net income of $543,286 in the year ended December 31, 2020. As of December 31, 2024, we had an accumulated deficit of $81,420,357. We may not be able to maintain profitability and may incur significant losses again in the future for a number of reasons, including unforeseen expenses, difficulties, complications, and delays, and other unknown events.
We cannot assure you that we will achieve sustainable operating profits as we continue to expand our brand and product offerings, further develop our marketing efforts, and otherwise implement our growth initiatives. Any failure to achieve and maintain profitability would have a materially adverse effect on our ability to implement our business plan, our results and operations, and our financial condition, and could cause the value of our Class A common stock to decline, resulting in a significant or complete loss of your investment.
An impairment in the carrying value of goodwill, trade names and other long-lived assets could negatively affect our consolidated results of operations and net worth.
Goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets, such as trade names, are recorded at fair value at the time of acquisition and are not amortized, but are reviewed for impairment at least annually or more frequently if impairment indicators arise. In evaluating the potential for impairment of goodwill and trade names, we make assumptions regarding future operating performance, business trends and market and economic conditions. Such analyses further require us to make certain assumptions about our sales, operating margins, growth rates and discount rates. There are inherent uncertainties related to these factors and in applying these factors to the assessment of goodwill and trade name recoverability. Goodwill reviews are prepared using estimates of the fair value of reporting units based on the estimated present value of future discounted cash flows. We could be required to evaluate the recoverability of goodwill or trade names prior to the annual assessment if we experience disruptions to the business, unexpected significant declines in operating results, a divestiture of a significant component of our business or market capitalization declines.
We also continually evaluate whether events or circumstances have occurred that indicate the remaining estimated useful lives of its definite-lived intangible assets, excluding goodwill, and other long-lived assets may warrant revision or whether the remaining balance of such assets may not be recoverable. We use an estimate of the related undiscounted cash flow over the remaining life of the asset in measuring whether the asset is recoverable.
In 2024, the Company recognized $11,383,000 of impairment charges on goodwill within the Soylent segment and $2,944,871 of impairment charges on goodwill within the Starco Brands segment. In 2023, the Company recognized $20,467,700 and $9,145,000 of impairment charges on goodwill within the Soylent segment and Starco Brands segment, respectively.
We cannot assure you that the remaining $12,361,520 of goodwill on the balance sheet as of December 31, 2024 will not be impaired in the future as it is not certain we will achieve sustainable operating profits and revenue growth in the future. Failure to achieve and maintain profitability could lead to a triggering event that would require analysis of whether the remaining goodwill should be impaired.
If we do not obtain adequate capital funding or improve our financial performance, we may not be able to continue as a going concern.
The report of our independent registered public accounting firm for the year ended December 31, 2024 included herein contains an explanatory paragraph indicating that there is substantial doubt as to our ability to continue as a going concern as a result of recurring losses from operations. This report is dated April 18, 2025. Our consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, which contemplate that we will continue to operate as a going concern. Our consolidated financial statements do not contain any adjustments that might result if we are unable to continue as a going concern. Our ability to continue as a going concern will be determined by our ability to continue generating revenues from our operations, which will enable us to fund our expansion plans and realize our business objectives. If we are unable to continue to grow our revenue and to and sustain profitability, we may not be able to continue as a going concern.
Our success depends on our ability to uphold the reputation of our brands and our clients’ brands, which will depend on the effectiveness of our marketing, our product quality, and our client experience.
We believe that our and our company-clients’ brand image and brand awareness is vital to the success of our business. We also believe that maintaining and enhancing the image of ours and our clients’ brands, particularly in new markets where we have limited brand recognition, is important to maintaining and expanding our and our clients’ customer base. As we execute our acquisition and growth strategy, our ability to successfully expand into new markets or to maintain the strength and distinctiveness of the image of ours and our clients’ brands, our existing markets will be adversely impacted if we fail to connect with ours and our clients’ target customers. Among other things, we rely on our marketing, strategy, and media partners, as well as social media platforms, such as Instagram and Twitter, to help implement our marketing strategies and promote our and our clients’ brands. Ours and our clients’ brands and reputation may be adversely affected if we fail to achieve these objectives, if ours or our clients’ public image was to be tarnished by negative publicity, if we fail to deliver innovative and high-quality products acceptable to our customers, or if we face a product recall. Negative publicity regarding the production methods of our manufacturer The Starco Group or those of the client-companies we work with could adversely affect our reputation and sales. Additionally, while we devote considerable efforts and resources to protecting our and our clients’ intellectual property, if these efforts are not successful the value of our brand may be harmed. Any harm to our brand and reputation could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition.
If we are unable to anticipate consumer preferences and successfully develop and introduce new, innovative and updated products, we may not be able to maintain or increase our sales or achieve profitability.
Our success depends to a significant degree on our ability to timely identify and originate product trends as well as to anticipate and react to changing consumer demands. All of our products are subject to changing consumer preferences and we cannot predict such changes with any certainty. Product trends in food, household cleaning, air care, spirits and personal care markets can change rapidly. We will need to anticipate, identify and respond quickly to changing trends and consumer demands in order to provide the products our customers seek and maintain the image of our brands. If we cannot identify changing trends in advance, fail to react to changing trends or misjudge the market for a trend, our sales could be adversely affected, and we may be faced with a substantial amount of unsold inventory or missed opportunities. As a result, we may be forced to mark down our merchandise in order to dispose of slow-moving inventory, which may result in lower profit margins, negatively impacting our financial condition and results of operations.
Even if we are successful in anticipating consumer demands, our ability to adequately react to and execute on those demands will in part depend upon our continued ability to develop and introduce high-quality products. If we fail to introduce products in the categories that consumers want, demand for our products could decline and our brand image could be negatively impacted. Our failure to effectively introduce new products and enter into new product categories that are accepted by consumers could result in excess inventory, inventory write-downs, decreases in gross margins and a decrease in net revenues, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition.
Our ability to anticipate consumer preferences also goes hand-in-hand with our ability to provide effective marketing services for our clients. If we are unable to predict what might be attractive to the target consumers of our client’s products, our marketing efforts in connection with those products may be unsuccessful, which would negatively affect our reputation within the industry, and negatively affect our operating results.
An economic downturn or economic uncertainty in the United States may adversely affect consumer discretionary spending and demand for our products.
Our operating results are affected by the relative condition of the United States economy as many of our products may be considered discretionary items for consumers. In an economic downturn, our customers may reduce their spending and purchases due to job loss or fear of job loss, foreclosures, bankruptcies, higher consumer debt and interest rates, reduced access to credit, falling home prices, increased taxes, and/or lower consumer confidence. Consumer demand for our products may not reach our targets, or may decline, when there is an economic downturn or economic uncertainty. Current, recent past, and future conditions may also adversely affect our pricing and liquidation strategy; promotional activities, product liquidation, and decreased demand for consumer products could affect profitability and margins. Online customer traffic is difficult to forecast. Consequently, sales, operating, and financial results for a particular period are difficult to predict, and, therefore, it is difficult to forecast expected results for future periods. Any of the foregoing factors could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, and financial condition and could adversely affect our stock price.
Additionally, many of the effects and consequences of U.S. and global financial and economic conditions could potentially have a material adverse effect on our liquidity and capital resources, including the ability to raise additional capital, if needed, or could otherwise negatively affect our business and financial results. For example, global economic conditions may also adversely affect our suppliers’ access to capital and liquidity with which to maintain their inventory, production levels, and product quality and to operate their businesses, all of which could adversely affect our supply chain. Market instability could make it more difficult for us and our suppliers to accurately forecast future product demand trends, which could cause us to carry too much or too little merchandise in various product categories.
Additionally, inflationary factors such as increases in the costs to purchase products, acquire product rights and overhead costs may adversely affect our operating results. A continued high rate of inflation in the future may have an adverse effect on our ability to maintain current levels of gross margin and selling, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of revenues if the selling prices of our services do not increase with these increased costs.
We are subject to risks from changes to the trade policies, including tariff and import/export regulations by the U.S. and/or other foreign governments.
Changes in trade policy, including trade restrictions, new or increased tariffs or quotas, embargoes, sanctions and countersanctions, safeguards or customs restrictions by the U.S. and/or other foreign governments could have a material adverse impact on our business. The imposition of new tariffs or increases in existing tariffs on products imported from countries where we or our suppliers operate could result in increased costs for our consumer goods. These cost increases may reduce our margins, require us to raise prices, or make our products less competitive in the marketplace. In addition, other countries may change their business and trade policies in anticipation of or in response to increased import tariffs and other changes in trade policy and regulations already enacted or that may be enacted in the future. If we are unable to mitigate these risks through supply chain adjustments, pricing strategies, or other measures, our financial performance and growth prospects could be negatively affected. For example, the U.S. has recently imposed new tariffs on China related to the importation of certain product categories and China has responded with retaliatory tariffs.
Fluctuations in prices of raw materials and other inputs may adversely impact our results.
Some of our products are built with aluminum and other commodities with price volatility. Steel, aluminum and other commodity prices have historically been highly volatile and the costs for these items may increase in the future due to a variety of factors, including: the level of tariffs that the U.S. imposes on imported steel, aluminum and other commodities; an outbreak of conflicts in regions of the world that produce the commodities or the raw materials that go into the commodities or through which the commodities are transported; or a weakening U.S. dollar.
In addition, the cost of parts, materials, components or final assemblies has increased and may continue to increase for reasons other than changes in commodity prices. Factors such as the imposition of duties and tariffs and other trade barriers, supply and demand, the level of imports, freight costs, availability of transportation, the cost of manufacturing labor, availability of labor, inventory levels and general economic conditions may affect the price of parts, materials, or components of our CPG products.
Our results of operations could be materially harmed if we are unable to accurately forecast demand for our products.
To ensure adequate inventory supply, our manufacturers, TSG and Temperance, forecast inventory needs and estimate future demand for particular products on our behalf. Their ability to accurately forecast demand for our products could be affected by many factors, including an increase or decrease in demand for our products or for products of our competitors, their failure to accurately forecast acceptance of new products, product introductions by competitors, unanticipated changes in general market conditions, and weakening of economic conditions or consumer confidence in future economic conditions. Inventory levels in excess of customer demand may result in inventory write-downs or write-offs and the sale of excess inventory at discounted prices or in less preferred distribution channels, which could impair our brand image and have an adverse effect on gross margin, which ultimately impacts our revenues. In addition, if the manufacturers underestimate the demand for our products, they may not be able to produce products to meet our customer requirements, and this could result in delays in the shipment of our products and our ability to recognize revenue, lost sales, as well as damage to our reputation and distributor relationships.
In addition, our growth strategy has resulted in STCB acquiring three subsidiaries through mergers, in each case expanding our product line offerings. Each of AOS, Skylar and Soylent bring a new demographic of consumer to the forefront of the STCB consumer products space, spanning premium body and skincare products, to hypoallergenic fragrances, and plant-based complete nutrition. If under our stewardship we are unable to accurately forecast the demand for these new product lines we may damage brand image for these new segments.
We operate in a highly competitive market and the size and resources of some of our competitors may allow them to compete more effectively than we can, resulting in a loss of our market share and a decrease in our net revenue.
The categories in which we operate are highly competitive, both in the U.S. and globally, as a limited number of large manufacturers compete for consumer acceptance, limited retail shelf space and e-commerce opportunities. Because of the highly competitive environment in which we operate as well as increasing retailer concentration, our retailer customers, including online retailers, frequently seek to obtain pricing concessions or better trade terms, resulting in either reduction of our margins or losses of distribution to lower cost competitors. Competition is based upon brand perceptions, product performance and innovation, customer service and price. Our ability to compete effectively may be affected by a number of factors, including:
● We face competition from large, established companies, including The Procter & Gamble Company, Unilever, Johnson & Johnson, Diageo and others, that have significantly greater financial, marketing, research and development and other resources and greater market share than we do, which provides them with greater scale and negotiating leverage with retailers;
● Our competitors may have lower production, sales and distribution costs, and higher profit margins, which may enable them to offer aggressive retail discounts and other promotional incentives; and
● Our competitors may be able to obtain exclusive distribution rights at particular retailers or favorable in-store placement.
In general, the greater capabilities of these large competitors in these areas enable them to better withstand periodic product campaign failures, and more general downturns in the industry, compete more effectively on the basis of price and production and more quickly develop or locate and license new products. In addition, new companies may enter the markets in which we expect to compete, further increasing competition in our industry.
We rely on licensing agreements with The Starco Group and Temperance Distilling Company.
We are party to a licensing agreement (the “TSG Licensing Agreement”) with TSG dated July 12, 2017. Pursuant to this agreement, STCB licenses to TSG the exclusive right to manufacture and sell certain of STCB’s products, which it may sell under the brand names owned by STCB. In return, TSG pays STCB royalties based on TSG’s unit sales of the products licensed by STCB to TSG pursuant to the TSG Licensing Agreement. Most of the Company’s products are manufactured and sold by TSG pursuant to this Licensing Agreement. As such, we are reliant on the TSG Licensing Agreement with TSG for a significant portion of our business. In addition, due to the close relationship of the Company and TSG, the deal terms that the Company has procured under this TSG Licensing Agreement (relating to manufacturing and royalties the Company receives on product sales by TSG) are favorable to the Company and would be difficult to replicate with another third-party manufacturer. Further, if for some reason the Company wanted to switch to an alternative provider for the manufacturing and selling of Company products, the TSG Licensing Agreement grants TSG an exclusive right to the products of the Company, and therefore the Company would be unable to change to another manufacturer without the consent of TSG or a breach by TSG of the terms of the TSG Licensing Agreement. Under the terms of the TSG Licensing Agreement, the agreement expires December 31, 2028, but may be terminated by either party immediately upon the material breach of the TSG Licensing Agreement by the other party. If TSG were to assert a breach of the TSG Licensing Agreement by the Company, and was successful in terminating the TSG Licensing Agreement, it could have a material adverse effect on the Company and its operating results.
We are party to a licensing agreement with Temperance Distilling Company (the “TDC Agreement”), dated January 24, 2022. In the TDC Agreement, STCB licenses to Temperance the right to manufacture and sell products using the brand name Whipshots®. In return, Temperance agrees to pay STCB royalties based on net unit sales of products licensed by STCB to Temperance. At this time, Temperance is the sole manufacturer for Whipshots® products, thus we are reliant on the TDC Agreement for all royalties related to the Whipshots® products.
Certain of our products rely on a single manufacturer.
Whipshots®, a significant contributor to our revenue for fiscal year 2023 and 2024, is manufactured by Temperance. Temperance is responsible for the procurement of all raw materials and components required to manufacture Whipshots®. Due to the unique nature of Whipshots®, the Company is reliant on Temperance as the manufacturer of Whipshots® and would not be able to easily find a comparable third-party manufacturer if needed. The operations of Temperance can be subject to additional risks beyond our control, including shipping delays, labor disputes, trade restrictions, tariffs and embargos, or any other change in local conditions. Temperance may experience a significant disruption in the supply or raw materials from current sources and, in the event of such a disruption, it may be unable to locate alternative materials suppliers of comparable quality at an acceptable price, or at all. There have occasionally been, and there may again in the future be, shipments of products by Temperance to the Company’s customers that fail to comply with our specifications or that fail to conform to our quality control standards or those of our customers. Under these circumstances, we may incur substantial expense to remedy the problems and may be required to obtain replacement products. If we fail to remedy any such problem in a timely manner, we risk the loss of net revenue resulting from the inability to sell those products and related increased administrative and shipping costs. Additionally, if the unacceptability of our products is not discovered until after such products are purchased by our customers, our customers could lose confidence in our products or we could face a product recall. In such an event our brand reputation may be negatively impacted which could negatively impact our results of operations.
Another manufacturer of a significant number of our products is Gehl Foods, LLC (“Gehl”), a non-affiliate, whom we are reliant on to a meaningful degree. The operations of Gehl can be subject to risks beyond our control, including shipping delays, labor disputes, trade restrictions, tariffs and embargos, or any other change in local conditions. Gehl may experience a significant disruption in the supply or raw materials from current sources and, in the event of such a disruption, it may be unable to locate alternative materials suppliers of comparable quality at an acceptable price, or at all. There may be shipments of products by Gehl to the Company’s customers that fail to comply with our specifications or that fail to conform to our quality control standards or those of our customers. Under these circumstances, we may incur substantial expense to remedy the problems and may be required to obtain replacement products. If we fail to remedy any such problem in a timely manner, we risk the loss of net revenue resulting from the inability to sell those products and related increased administrative and shipping costs. Additionally, if the unacceptability of our products is not discovered until after such products are purchased by our customers, our customers could lose confidence in our products or we could face a product recall. In such an event our brand reputation may be negatively impacted which could negatively impact our results of operations.
Our sales and gross margins may decline as a result of increasing product costs and may not keep up with inflation.
Our business is subject to significant pressure on costs and pricing caused by many factors, including intense competition, constrained sourcing capacity and related inflationary pressure, pressure from consumers to reduce the prices we charge for our products, and changes in consumer demand. These factors may cause us to experience increased costs, reduce our prices to consumers or experience reduced sales in response to increased prices, any of which could cause our operating margin to decline if we are unable to offset these factors with reductions in operating costs and could have a material adverse effect on our financial conditions, operating results and cash flows.
In addition, the United States and the countries in which our products are produced or sold internationally have imposed and may impose additional quotas, duties, tariffs, or other restrictions or regulations, or may adversely adjust prevailing quota, duty or tariff levels. Countries impose, modify and remove tariffs and other trade restrictions in response to a diverse array of factors, including global and national economic and political conditions, which make it impossible for us to predict future developments regarding tariffs and other trade restrictions. Trade restrictions, including tariffs, quotas, embargoes, safeguards, and customs restrictions, could increase the cost or reduce the supply of products available to us or may require us to modify our supply chain organization or other current business practices, any of which could harm our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our margins may decline as a result of increasing freight costs.
Freight costs are impacted by changes in fuel prices through surcharges, among other factors. Fuel prices and surcharges affect freight costs both on inbound freight from suppliers to the distribution center as well as outbound freight from the distribution center to stores/shops, supplier returns and third-party liquidators, and shipments of product to customers. The cost of transporting our products for distribution and sale is also subject to fluctuation due in large part to the price of oil. Our products must be transported by third parties over large geographical distances and an increase in the price of oil can significantly increase costs. Manufacturing delays or unexpected transportation delays can also cause us to rely more heavily on airfreight to achieve timely delivery to our customers, which significantly increases freight costs. Increases in fuel prices, surcharges, and other potential factors may increase freight costs. Since the Company receives a royalty on all of its product sales based on the total unit sales of the product minus costs, one of which is freight costs, these fluctuations may increase our cost of products and have an adverse effect on our margins, results of operations and financial condition.
If we fail to adequately protect our intellectual property rights, competitors may manufacture and market similar products, which could adversely affect our market share and results of operations.
All of our product sales are from products bearing proprietary trademarks and brand names. In addition, we own or license patents and patent applications for certain products we sell. We rely on trademark, trade secret, patent and copyright laws to protect our intellectual property rights. There is a risk that we will not be able to obtain and perfect or maintain our own intellectual property rights or, where appropriate, license intellectual property rights necessary to support new product introductions. In addition, even if such rights are protected in the U.S., the laws of some other countries in which our products are or may be sold do not protect intellectual property rights to the same extent as the laws of the U.S. Our intellectual property rights could be invalidated, circumvented or challenged in the future, and we could incur significant costs in connection with legal actions relating to such rights. As patents expire, we could face increased competition or decreased royalties, either of which could negatively impact our operating results. If other parties infringe our intellectual property rights, they may dilute the value of our brands in the marketplace, which could diminish the value that consumers associate with our brands and harm our sales.
We may be subject to liability if we infringe upon the intellectual property rights of third parties.
We may be subject to liability if we infringe upon the intellectual property rights of third parties. If we were to be found liable for any such infringement, we could be required to pay substantial damages and could be subject to injunctions preventing further infringement. Such infringement claims could harm our brand image.
Our business involves the potential for product liability and other claims against us, which could affect our results of operations and financial condition and result in product recalls or withdrawals.
We face exposure to claims arising out of alleged defects in our products, including for property damage, bodily injury or other adverse effects. We do not currently maintain product liability insurance, which puts us at a greater risk of harm to our business operations should we receive a monetary judgment against us in relation to a product liability lawsuit. We intend on obtaining product liability insurance in the future. However, even with product liability insurance, we would not be covered against all types of claims, particularly claims other than those involving personal injury or property damage or claims that exceed the amount of insurance coverage. Further, we may not be able to maintain such insurance in sufficient amounts, on desirable terms, or at all, in the future. In addition to the risk of monetary judgments not covered by insurance, product liability claims could result in negative publicity that could harm our products’ reputation and in certain cases require a product recall. Product recalls or product liability claims, and any subsequent remedial actions, could have a material adverse effect on our business, reputation, brand value, results of operations and financial condition.
Our failure to comply with trade and other regulations could lead to investigations or actions by government regulators and negative publicity.
The labeling, distribution, importation, marketing and sale of our products are subject to extensive regulation by various federal agencies, including the Federal Trade Commission, Consumer Product Safety Commission, the Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) and state attorneys general in the U.S., as well as by various other federal, state, provincial, local and international regulatory authorities in the locations in which our products are distributed or sold. If we fail to comply with those regulations, we could become subject to significant penalties or claims or be required to recall products, which could negatively impact our results of operations and disrupt our ability to conduct our business, as well as damage our brand image with consumers. In addition, the adoption of new regulations or changes in the interpretation of existing regulations may result in significant unanticipated compliance costs or discontinuation of product sales and may impair the marketing of our products, resulting in significant loss of net revenues.
Should we choose to pursue international sales, we will be subject to compliance with the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, or FCPA, and other anti-bribery laws applicable to our operations. Although we have policies and procedures to address compliance with the FCPA and similar laws, there can be no assurance that all of our employees, agents and other partners will not take actions in violations of our policies. Any such violation could subject us to sanctions or other penalties that could negatively affect our reputation, business and operating results.
Our future success depends on our key executive officers and our ability to attract, retain, and motivate qualified personnel.
Our future success largely depends upon the continued services of our executive officers and management team, especially our Chief Executive Officer, Ross Sklar. If one or more of our executive officers are unable or unwilling to continue in their present positions, we may not be able to replace them readily, if at all. Additionally, we may incur additional expenses to recruit and retain new executive officers. If any of our executive officers joins a competitor or forms a competing company, we may lose some or all of our customers. Finally, we do not maintain “key person” life insurance on any of our executive officers. Because of these factors, the loss of the services of any of these key persons could adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations, and thereby an investment in our stock.
In addition, our continuing ability to attract and retain highly qualified personnel, especially employees with experience in branding and marketing, will also be critical to our success because we will need to hire and retain additional personnel as our business grows. There can be no assurance that we will be able to attract or retain highly qualified personnel. We face significant competition for skilled personnel in our industries. This competition may make it more difficult and expensive to attract, hire, and retain qualified managers and employees. Because of these factors, we may not be able to effectively manage or grow our business, which could adversely affect our financial condition or business. As a result, the value of your investment could be significantly reduced or completely lost.
If the technology-based systems that give our customers the ability to shop with us online do not function effectively, our operating results could be materially adversely affected.
A portion of our customers shop with us through our e-commerce websites, which currently sells certain of our Skylar® and Soylent® products. While many of our products are sold in retail stores, increasingly, customers are using tablets and smart phones to shop online, and we do plan on increasing our product offerings on ecommerce websites in the future. Any failure on our part to provide an attractive, effective, reliable, user-friendly e-commerce platform that offers a wide assortment of merchandise with rapid delivery options and that continually meet the changing expectations of online shoppers could place us at a competitive disadvantage, result in the loss of sales, harm our reputation with customers, and could have a material adverse impact on our business and results of operations.
Security breaches and other disruptions could compromise our information and expose us to liability, which would cause our business and reputation to suffer.
In the ordinary course of our business, we collect and store sensitive data, including intellectual property, our proprietary business information, and financial and other personally identifiable information of our customers and employees. The secure processing, maintenance, and transmission of this information is critical to our operations and business strategy. Despite our security measures, our information technology and infrastructure may be vulnerable to attacks by hackers or breached due to employee error, malfeasance, or other disruptions. Any such breach could compromise our networks and the information stored there could be accessed, publicly disclosed, lost, or stolen. Advanced attacks are multi-staged, unfold over time, and utilize a range of attack vectors with military-grade cyber weapons and proven techniques, such as spear phishing and social engineering, leaving organizations and users at high risk of being compromised. The vast majority of data breaches, whether conducted by a cyber attacker from inside or outside of the organization, involve the misappropriation of digital identities and user credentials. These credentials are used to gain legitimate access to sensitive systems and high-value personal and corporate data. Many large, well-known organizations have been subject to cyber-attacks that exploited the identity vector, demonstrating that even organizations with significant resources and security expertise have challenges securing their identities. Any such access, disclosure, or other loss of information could result in legal claims or proceedings, liability under laws that protect the privacy of personal information, regulatory penalties, a disruption of our operations, damage to our reputation, or a loss of confidence in our business, any of which could adversely affect our business, revenues, and competitive position.
Organizations face growing regulatory and compliance requirements.
New and evolving regulations and compliance standards for cyber security, data protection, privacy, and internal IT controls are often created in response to the tide of cyber-attacks and will increasingly impact organizations. Existing regulatory standards require that organizations implement internal controls for user access to applications and data. In addition, data breaches are driving a new wave of regulation with stricter enforcement and higher penalties. Regulatory and policy-driven obligations require expensive and time-consuming compliance measures. The fear of non-compliance, failed audits, and material findings has pushed organizations to spend more to ensure they are in compliance, often resulting in costly, one-off implementations to mitigate potential fines or reputational damage. Any substantial costs associated with failing to meet regulatory requirements, combined with the risk of fallout from security breaches, could have a material adverse effect on our business and brand.
Acquisition opportunities may present themselves that in hindsight did not achieve the positive results anticipated by our management.
From time to time, acquisition opportunities have, and may in the future, become available to us. Those opportunities may involve the acquisition of specific assets, like intellectual property or inventory, or may involve the assumption of the business operations of another entity. If the performance of our acquisitions (AOS®, Skylar® or Soylent®) do not produce positive results, the dilution to stockholders from related true-up share issuances (approximately 135 million shares) and any interest rate on debt held by such subsidiary, may prove detrimental to our financial results and the performance of your particular shares.
Our goal with any future acquisition is that any acquisition should be able to contribute neutral to positive net income to the company after integration. To effect these future acquisitions, we will likely be required to obtain lender financing or issue additional shares of stock in exchange for the shares of the target entity. If the performance of the acquired assets or entity does not produce positive results for the company, the terms of the acquisition, whether it is interest rate on debt, or additional dilution of stockholders, may prove detrimental to the financial results of the company, or the performance of your particular shares.
Pandemics may have an impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
In December 2019, a novel strain of coronavirus, or COVID-19, was reported and spread across the globe, including the United States, and in March 2020 was declared to be a pandemic by the World Health Organization. Efforts to contain the spread of COVID-19 intensified and the United States, Europe and Asia implemented severe travel restrictions, social distancing and government imposed lockdowns.
If a future pandemic or health epidemic was to arise, if there is a resurgence of the COVID-19 pandemic or if there are other lingering effects of the pandemic that could adversely impact our business and results of operations in a number of ways, including but not limited to:
● A shutdown, disruption or less than full utilization of one or more of our manufacturers, warehousers or distributors’ facilities, or disruption in our supply chain or customer base, including but not limited to, as a result of illness, government restrictions or other workforce disruptions;
● The failure of third parties on which we rely, including but not limited to those that supply our raw materials and other necessary operating materials, manufacturers and independent contractors, to meet their obligations to us, or significant disruptions in their ability to do so;
● New or escalated government or regulatory responses in markets where we manufacture, sell or distribute our products, or in the markets of third parties on which we rely, could prevent or disrupt our business operations;
● Significant reductions or volatility in demand for one or more of our products, which may be caused by, among other things: the temporary inability of consumers to purchase our products due to illness, quarantine or other travel restrictions, or financial hardship; or other pandemic related restrictions impacting consumer behavior;
● An inability to respond to or capitalize on increased demand, including challenges and increased costs associated with adding capacity with our manufacturers;
● A change in demand for or availability of our products as a result of retailers, distributors or carriers modifying their inventory, fulfillment or shipping practices; and
● The unknown duration and magnitude of a pandemic and all of its related impacts.
These and other impacts of a pandemic have and could have the effect of heightening many of the other risk factors disclosed in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The ultimate impact depends on the severity and duration of the pandemic and actions taken by governmental authorities and other third parties in response, each of which is uncertain and difficult to predict. Any of these disruptions could adversely impact our business and results of operations.
We have reported material weaknesses in internal controls.
We have reported material weaknesses in internal controls over financial reporting as of December 31, 2024, and we cannot provide any assurances that additional material weaknesses will not be identified in the future or that we can effectively remediate our reported weaknesses. If our internal controls over financial reporting or disclosure controls and procedures are not effective, there may be errors in our financial statements that could require a restatement, or our filings may not be timely, and investors may lose confidence in our reported financial information.
Section 404 of Sarbanes-Oxley requires us to evaluate the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting every quarter and as of the end of each year, and to include a management report assessing the effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting in each Annual Report on Form 10-K. Our management, including our Chief Executive Officer, and Chief Financial Officer, do not expect that our internal control over financial reporting will prevent all errors and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the control system’s objectives will be met. Furthermore, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the controls. Over time, controls may become inadequate because changes in the conditions or deterioration in the degree of compliance with policies or procedures may occur. Because the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.
As a result, we cannot assure you that additional significant deficiencies or material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting will not be identified in the future or that we can effectively remediate our reported weaknesses. Any failure to maintain or implement required new or improved controls, or any difficulties we may encounter in their implementation, could result in significant deficiencies or material weaknesses, cause us to fail to timely meet our periodic reporting obligations, or result in material misstatements in our consolidated financial statements. Any such failure could also adversely affect the results of periodic management evaluations regarding disclosure controls and the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting required under Section 404 of Sarbanes-Oxley and the rules promulgated thereunder. The existence of material weaknesses could result in errors in our consolidated financial statements and subsequent restatements of our consolidated financial statements, cause us to fail to timely meet our reporting obligations and cause investors to lose confidence in our reported financial information.

---

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
Not applicable.

---

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
Item 2. Properties
Our principal offices are located at 706 N Citrus Avenue, Los Angeles, California, 90038.

---

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
None.

---

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURE
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures
Not applicable.
PART II

---

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY
Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchase of Equity Securities
Market Information
Our Class A common stock is listed to trade on the OTC Markets Group OTCQB tier under the symbol “STCB.” Any over-the-counter market quotations reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, mark-downs or commissions, and may not necessarily represent actual transactions.
Our Class A common stock shares are subject to Section 15(g) and Rule 15g-9 of the Securities and Exchange Act, commonly referred to as the “penny stock” rule. The rule defines penny stock to be any equity security that has a market price less than $5.00 per share, subject to certain exceptions. These rules may restrict the ability of broker-dealers to trade or maintain a market in our Class A common stock and may affect the ability of stockholders to sell their shares. Broker-dealers who sell penny stocks to persons other than established customers and accredited investors must make a special suitability determination for the purchase of the security. Accredited investors, in general, include individuals with assets in excess of $1,000,000 (not including their personal residence) or annual income exceeding $200,000 or $300,000 together with their spouse, and certain institutional investors. The rules require the broker-dealer to receive the purchaser’s written consent to the transaction prior to the purchase and require the broker-dealer to deliver a risk disclosure document relating to the penny stock prior to the first transaction. A broker-dealer also must disclose the commissions payable to both the broker-dealer and the registered representative, and current quotations for the security. Finally, monthly statements must be sent to customers disclosing recent price information for the penny stocks.
On April 16, 2025, the closing price for our Class A common stock as reported on the OTCQB was $0.03. As of such date, we had 647,431,696 shares of Class A common stock issued and outstanding. We had no shares of Class B common stock or Preferred Stock outstanding.
Holders
As of April 16, 2025, we had 343 stockholders of record, which does not include stockholders who hold shares in “street accounts” of securities brokers.
Dividends
We have not paid cash or stock dividends and have no present plan to pay any dividends, intending instead to reinvest our earnings, if any. For the foreseeable future, we expect to retain any earnings to finance the operation and expansion of our business and the payment of any cash dividends on our Class A common stock is unlikely.
Equity Compensation Plans
On November 27, 2023, our Board adopted an equity compensation plan (the “Equity Plan”) for employees and service providers of the Company, which authorized for issuance 100,000,000 shares of our Class A common stock. On March 18, 2024, certain stockholders constituting a majority of the voting rights of the Class A common stock, approved by written consent in lieu of a special meeting the stockholders the Equity Plan. The Company filed a Schedule 14C Definitive Information Statement (a “Definitive 14C”) relating to such corporate action on March 29, 2024, which was effective April 18, 2024.
Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities
All sales of unregistered Class A common stock of the Company during fiscal years 2023 and 2024 and through the date of this report were made in reliance upon Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act and are set forth below:
Date Shares of Common Stock Issuable Cash Proceeds / Value in Kind from Shares Issuable Recipient(s) of Shares
February 15, 2023 177,954,287 $ 26,693,143 21 entities
4 individuals
March 31, 2023 81,249 $ 81,249 2 individuals
June 30, 2023 81,249 $ 81,249 2 individuals
September 30, 2023 81,249 $ 81,249 2 individuals
December 31, 2023 27,091 $ 27,091 2 individuals
December 31, 2023 19,268,162 (1) $ 3,371,252 (2) 8 entities
18 individuals
February 14, 2024 16,309,203 (3) $ 2,446,380 (4) 20 entities
4 individuals
February 14, 2024 125,642,385 (5) $ 14,515,341 21 entities
4 individuals
March 12, 2024 4,979,731 (6) $ 946,149 (7) 3 entities
11 individuals
June 30, 2024 11,573,660 (1) $ 2,314,732 (2) 15 entities
22 individuals
(1) Shares recorded for this issuance are holdback shares issued as part of the Skylar Merger Agreement.
(2) The value recorded was previously recorded and recognized in 2022 pursuant to the initial Form D offering/Cash proceeds calculations in the Registrant’s prior filings with respect to the Skylar Merger Agreement.
(3) Shares recorded for this issuance are holdback shares issued as part of the Soylent Merger Agreement.
(4) The value recorded was previously recorded and recognized in 2023 pursuant to the initial Form D offering/Cash proceeds calculations in the Registrant’s prior filings with respect to the Soylent Merger Agreement.
(5) Shares recorded for this issuance are contingent shares issued as part of a true-up relating to the Soylent Merger Agreement.
(6) Shares recorded for this issuance are holdback shares issued as part of the AOS Merger Agreement.
(7) The value recorded was previously recorded and recognized in 2022 pursuant to the initial Form D offering/Cash proceeds calculations in the Registrant’s prior filings with respect to the AOS Merger Agreement.
All sales of unregistered warrants to purchase common stock of the Company during fiscal years 2023 were made in reliance upon Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act.
Date Warrants to Purchase Shares of Common Stock Consideration Exercise Price Recipient(s) of Shares
March 3, 2023 114,286 Funding Fee for Loan Origination $ 0.01 1 individual
June 1, 2023 150,000 Consulting Services $ 0.19 1 individual
Issuer Purchase of Securities.
On June 13, 2021, the Company entered into Separation Agreements (the “Separation Agreements”) with Sanford Lang (“Mr. Lang”) and Martin Goldrod (“Mr. Goldrod”) whereas, effective as of June 16, 2021, Mr. Lang and Mr. Goldrod each resigned from their positions as members of the Board in exchange for certain separation benefits (the “Separation Benefits”). As consideration for the Separation Benefits, and not in addition to the same, the Company agreed to purchase an amount of the shares of common stock per month from Mr. Lang and Mr. Goldrod at a price per share that when aggregated with all shares purchased in each month would equal monthly Separation Benefit payments of $7,950 to Mr. Lang and monthly Separation Benefit payments of $3,000 to Mr. Goldrod (the “Repurchases”). As of January 2, 2024, the Separation Agreements were terminated and the final Repurchases of 1,862,154 shares of common stock in the amount of $328,500 were settled. There were no other repurchases made during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024.

---

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
Item 6. [Reserved]

---

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following discussion and analysis of the consolidated results of operations and financial condition of Starco Brands, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2024 and 2023 and for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023 should be read in conjunction with our financial statements and the notes to those financial statements that are included elsewhere in this Annual Report following Item 16 (“Form 10-K Summary”). References in this “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” to “us,” “we,” “our,” and similar terms refer to Starco Brands, Inc. This Annual Report contains forward-looking statements as that term is defined in the federal securities laws. The events described in forward-looking statements contained in this Annual Report may not occur. Generally, these statements relate to business plans or strategies, projected or anticipated benefits or other consequences of our plans or strategies, projected or anticipated benefits from acquisitions that may be made by us, or projections involving anticipated revenues, earnings or other aspects of our operating results. The words “may,” “will,” “expect,” “believe,” “anticipate,” “project,” “plan,” “intend,” “estimate,” and “continue,” and their opposites and similar expressions, are intended to identify forward-looking statements. We caution you that these statements are not guarantees of future performance or events and are subject to a number of uncertainties, risks and other influences, many of which are beyond our control, which may influence the accuracy of the statements and the projections upon which the statements are based. Factors that could cause our actual results of operations and financial condition to differ materially are set forth in Item 1A, “Risk Factors” section of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
We caution that these factors could cause our actual results of operations and financial condition to differ materially from those expressed in any forward-looking statements we make and that investors should not place undue reliance on any such forward-looking statements. Further, any forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date on which such statement is made, and we undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statement to reflect events or circumstances after the date on which such statement is made or to reflect the occurrence of anticipated or unanticipated events or circumstances. New factors emerge from time to time, and it is not possible for us to predict all of such factors. Further, we cannot assess the impact of each such factor on our results of operations or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statements.
Business Overview
Starco Brands, Inc. (formerly Insynergy Products, Inc.), which we refer to as “the Company,” “our Company,” “STCB”, “we,” “us” or “our,” was incorporated in the State of Nevada on January 26, 2010 under the name Insynergy, Inc. On September 7, 2017, the Company filed an Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation to change the corporate name to Starco Brands, Inc. The Board determined the change of the Company’s name was in the best interests of the Company due to changes in our current and anticipated business operations at that time. In July 2017, the Company entered into a licensing agreement with The Starco Group (“TSG”), a related party entity, located in Los Angeles, California. TSG is a private label and branded aerosol and liquid fill manufacturer with manufacturing assets in the following verticals: DIY/Hardware, paints, coatings and adhesives, household, hair care, disinfectants, automotive, motorcycle, arts & crafts, personal care cosmetics, personal care FDA, sun care, food, cooking oils, beverages, and spirits and wine. Upon entering into the licensing agreement with TSG, the Company pivoted to commercializing novel consumer products manufactured by TSG.
In 2022, the Company embarked on a strategy to grow its consumer product line offerings through the acquisition of multiple subsidiaries with established behavior changing products and brands. With an increased product line and its existing partner relationships, the Company has continued expanding its vertical and consumer base through 2024.
Executive Overview
In July 2017, our Board entered into a licensing agreement with TSG to pursue a new strategic marketing plan involving commercializing leading edge products with the intent to sell them through brick and mortar and online retailers. We are a company whose mission is to create behavior-changing products and brands. Our core competency is inventing brands, marketing, building trends, pushing awareness and social marketing. The licensing agreement with TSG provided STCB with certain products on an exclusive and royalty-free basis and other products on a non-exclusive and royalty basis, in the categories of food, household cleaning, air care, spirits and personal care.
The current CEO and owner of TSG, Ross Sklar, was named the CEO of STCB in August of 2017. Mr. Sklar has spent his career commercializing technology in industrial and consumer markets. Mr. Sklar has built teams of manufacturing personnel, research and development, and sales and marketing professionals over the last 20 years and has grown TSG into a successful and diversified manufacturer supplying a wide range of products to some of the largest retailers in the United States. As the Company continues to grow the number of products and brands under the STCB umbrella, it will continue to leverage its relationship with TSG to streamline its product manufacturing.
Results of Operations
Comparison of the year ended December 31, 2024 to the year ended December 31, 2023
December 31, December 31,
Change
Revenues $ 52,527,130 $ 51,948,733 $ 578,397
Revenues, related parties 6,140,172 11,696,722 (5,556,550 )
Cost of goods sold 33,907,301 34,991,482 (1,084,181 )
Cost of goods sold, related parties 3,896,551 2,688,160 1,208,391
Gross profit 20,863,450 25,965,813 (5,102,363 )
Operating expenses:
Compensation expense 9,037,123 15,899,492 (6,862,369 )
Professional fees 3,533,052 5,861,649 (2,328,597 )
Marketing, general and administrative 18,890,738 19,829,585 (938,847 )
Fair value share adjustment (10,544,263 ) 215,531 (10,759,794 )
Goodwill impairment 14,327,871 29,612,700 (15,284,829 )
Intangibles impairment 13,304 - 13,304
Total operating expense 35,257,825 71,418,957 (36,161,132 )
Loss from operations (14,394,375 ) (45,453,144 ) 31,058,769
Other expense:
Interest expense 961,588 850,105 111,483
Other expense 1,978,586 98,872 1,879,714
Total other expense 2,940,174 948,977 1,991,197
Loss before provision for income taxes (17,334,549 ) (46,402,121 ) 29,067,572
Provision for income taxes - - -
Net loss (17,334,549 ) (46,402,121 ) 29,067,572
Net loss attributable to non-controlling interest 316,339 (210,871 ) 527,210
Net loss attributable to Starco Brands $ (17,650,888 ) $ (46,191,250 ) $ 28,540,362
Revenues
For the year ended December 31, 2024, we recorded revenues of $52,527,130, compared to $51,948,733 for the year ended December 31, 2023 for an increase of $578,397 or 1%. The growth was largely due to recognition of a full twelve months of revenue from Soylent in the current period versus only ten and a half months of sales from Soylent in the prior period, as the Company acquired Soylent in February 2023. This increase in Soylent revenue was augmented by growth in sales of Winona.
Revenues, related parties
For the year ended December 31, 2024, the Company recorded related party revenues of $6,140,172 compared to $11,696,722 for the year ended December 31, 2023, resulting in a decrease of $5,556,550 or 48%. The decrease in the current period was largely driven by lower Whipshots sales due to industry de-stocking and lower levels of new retailer loading.
Cost of Goods Sold
For the year ended December 31, 2024, we recorded cost of goods sold of $33,907,301, compared to $34,991,482 for the year ended December 13, 2023, a decrease of $1,084,181 or 3%. The decrease can be attributed to an inventory adjustment to fair value of approximately $3.0 million related to the Soylent acquisition that was incorporated into cost of goods sold in the prior year; such yields lower costs in the current year.
Cost of Goods Sold, Related Parties
For the year ended December 31, 2024, our cost of goods sold, related parties amounted to $3,896,551, reflecting an increase of $1,208,391 or 45%, compared to $2,688,160 for the year ended December 13, 2023. The increase can be attributed to increases in sales for Winona in the current year, which yielded increased costs of goods sold.
Operating Expenses
For the year ended December 31, 2024, our compensation expense amounted to $9,037,123, reflecting a decrease of $6,862,369 or 43%, compared to $15,899,492 for the year ended December 31, 2023. The decrease was primarily due to a decrease in stock-based compensation from the prior year, when shares of Whipshots Holdings in the amount of approximately $8.7 million were issued to Washpoppin at the end of the period.
For the year ended December 31, 2024, our professional fees totaled $3,533,052, representing a decrease of $2,328,597 or 40%, compared to $5,861,649 in the prior year. Professional fees are mainly for contractors, accounting, auditing and legal services associated with business operations, merger activity, and our quarterly filings as a public company, and advisory and valuation services. The decrease is primarily due to a decrease in expenses (contractor fees, legal, and audit fees) in the current year period compared to expenses related to the acquisitions of Soylent, Skylar, and AOS in the prior year period.
For the year ended December 31, 2024, our marketing, general and administrative expenses amounted to $18,890,738, reflecting a decrease of $938,847 or 5%, compared to $19,829,585 for the year ended December 31, 2023. The decrease can be attributed to lower marketing expenses in the current year, as last year’s higher spending was driven by a business acquisition.
For the year ended December 31, 2024, we incurred a fair value share adjustment gain of $10,544,263 compared to a loss of $215,531 in the prior year; this was due to a decrease in the fair value of the Soylent sellers’ rights to potentially receive additional Starco shares
For the year ended December 31, 2024, we incurred goodwill impairment losses of $14,327,871; the Starco Brands segment and the Soylent segment were impaired by $2,944,871 and $11,383,000, respectively, and have remaining goodwill balances of $0 and $1,127,208, respectively, as of December 31, 2024.
For the year ended December 31, 2024, we incurred an intangibles impairment loss of $13,304 to the AOS component of the Starco Brands segment.
Other Expense
For the year ended December 31, 2024, we had total other expenses of $2,940,174 compared to other expenses of $948,977 for the year ended December 31, 2023. For the year ended December 31, 2024, we had interest expense of $961,588 compared to $850,105 for the year ended December 31, 2023; such increase in interest expense is a result of the addition of the Gibraltar revolving loan in the current year. Other expenses, primarily related to the write-off of disputed receivables and settlements with vendors relating to prior years, increased to $1,978,586 for the year ended December 31, 2024 from $98,872 in the prior year.
Net Loss
For the year ended December 31, 2024, we recorded a net loss of $17,334,549, compared to net loss of $46,402,121 for the year ended December 31, 2023. The change in net loss is primarily attributed to a $15,284,829 reduction in goodwill impairment compared to the prior year, a change in fair value adjustment from the prior year of $10,759,794 and a $6,862,369 decrease in compensation expense. The reduction in compensation expense in the current year stems from elevated stock-based compensation costs in the prior year, including shares issued to Whipshots Holdings for Washpoppin and higher warrants expenses. Additionally, prior year compensation expenses increased due to added costs associated with the acquisitions of AOS, Skylar, and Soylent.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
As reflected in the accompanying consolidated financial statements, we have an accumulated deficit of $81,420,357 at December 31, 2024. We used $2,329,940 in cash from financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2024, primarily due to $3,541,543 of net proceeds from the revolving loan, offset by payments made on loans from related parties and on the line of credit of $2,000,000 and $3,835,247, respectively. We used cash from financing activities of $175,796 for the year ended December 31, 2023, primarily due to $964,753 of net payments on the line of credit and $131,400 of repurchases of common stock, which was partially offset by $800,000 of loan advances from Ross Sklar and $127,148 of borrowings for insurance policies.
Our net cash provided by operating activities was $2,215,446 for the year ended December 31, 2024 compared to $686,657 for the year ended December 31, 2023. Operating expenses for the year ended December 31, 2024 were $35,257,825, including items such as marketing, advertising and administrative costs, consultant compensation, insurance, legal and other professional fees, compliance, website maintenance, investor relations, loss on share fair value adjustment, goodwill impairment loss and intangible impairment loss. Operating expenses for the year ended December 31, 2023 were $71,418,957, including items such as marketing and administrative costs, consultant compensation, insurance, legal and other professional fees, compliance, website maintenance, loss on share fair value adjustment and goodwill impairment loss.
On January 24, 2020, STCB executed a promissory note for $100,000 with Ross Sklar, CEO. The note bore interest at 4% per annum, compounded monthly, was unsecured, and matured two years from the original date of issuance. This loan was subsequently amended to mature on July 19, 2023. On June 28, 2021, STCB executed an additional promissory note with Ross Sklar in the principal amount of $100,000 with the same terms as the January 24, 2020 note and a maturity date of June 28, 2023. On September 17, 2021, STCB executed a third promissory note with Ross Sklar in the principal amount of $500,000 with the same terms as the prior notes and a maturity date of September 17, 2023. On December 13, 2021, STCB executed a fourth promissory note with Ross Sklar in the principal amount of $500,000 with the same terms as the prior notes and a maturity date of December 12, 2023. On February 14, 2022, STCB executed a fifth promissory note with Ross Sklar in the principal amount of $472,500 with the same terms as the prior notes and a maturity date of February 14, 2024. This note is also convertible into the Class A common stock at the lender’s option and a conversion price of $0.29 per share. On December 29, 2022, STCB executed a sixth promissory note with Ross Sklar in the principal amount of $2,000,000. This note bears interest at Prime + 4% per annum, compounds monthly, is secured, matures on August 1, 2023, and included warrants to purchase 285,714 shares of our common stock at a price of $0.01 per share. On March 3, 2023, STCB executed a seventh promissory note with Ross Sklar in the principal amount of $800,000. This note bears interest at Prime + 4% per annum, compounds monthly, is secured, matures on July 1, 2023, and included warrants to purchase 114,286 shares of our common stock at a price of $0.01 per share.
On August 11, 2023, we issued to Sklar a consolidated secured promissory note (the “Consolidated Secured Promissory Note”) in the principal sum of $4,000,000, with a maturity date of December 31, 2024. The Consolidated Secured Promissory Note carries a floating interest rate comprised of the Wall Street Journal Prime Rate (re-assessed on the first date of each month (plus 2%), and is secured by an amended and restated consolidated security agreement (the “Amended and Restated Consolidated Security Agreement”), by and between the Company and Sklar, dated August 11, 2023, The Consolidated Secured Promissory Note consolidated the outstanding loan obligations of the Company to Sklar evidenced pursuant to the (i) Amended Note, (ii) the June 28, 2021 Note, (iii) the September 17, 2021 Note, (iv) the December 13, 2021 Note, (v) the December 29, 2022 Note, and (vi) the March 3, 2023 Note. The Amended and Restated Consolidated Security Agreement merged and integrated the December 29, 2022 Security Agreement and the March 3, 2023 Security Agreement, and provides a security interest in the Collateral (as defined in the Amended and Restated Consolidated Security Agreement) to secure the repayment of all principal, interest, costs, expenses and other amounts then or thereafter due under the Consolidated Secured Promissory Note until by the maturity date. Sklar was authorized to file financing statements to perfect the security interest in the Collateral without authentication by the Company. The following table represents Prior Notes that were part of the restructuring and related prior and updated terms (under the Consolidated Secured Promissory Note):
Original
Balance Original
maturity Original rate Revised
maturity Revised rate
January 24, 2020 Note $ 100,000 7/19/2023 4 % 08/31/2026 Prime + 2 %
June 28, 2021 Note 100,000 6/28/2023 4 % 08/31/2026 Prime + 2 %
September 17, 2021 Note 500,000 9/17/2023 4 % 08/31/2026 Prime + 2 %
December 13, 2022 Note 500,000 12/13/2023 4 % 08/31/2026 Prime + 2 %
December 29, 2022 Note 2,000,000 8/1/2023 Prime + 4 % 08/31/2026 Prime + 2 %
March 3, 2023 Note 800,000 7/1/2023 Prime + 4 % 08/31/2026 Prime + 2 %
$ 4,000,000 (1)
(1) Note that $1,527,500 of this total was repaid to Mr. Sklar in 2024 from proceeds under the Gibraltar Loan (see Loan and Security Agreement - Related Party below).
The restructuring is accounted for as a debt modification. On May 31, 2024, the Consolidated Secured Promissory Note was amended by that certain Amendment to Consolidated Secure Promissory Note, by and between STCB and Mr. Sklar, dated May 31, 2024 (the “2024 Consolidated Note Amendment” and together with the Consolidated Secured Promissory Note, the “Amended Consolidated Secured Promissory Note”). The 2024 Consolidated Note Amendment, among other things, extended the maturity date to August 31, 2026, provided that to the extent amounts remain due and payable on the maturity date, it will be extended until August 31, 2027.
On February 14, 2022, the Company issued an unsecured note to Sklar with a principal amount of $472,500, which was excluded from the note consolidation. The note carried an annual interest rate of 4% and was set to mature two years from its issuance. It was convertible into shares of Company common stock at a conversion price of $0.29 per share, based on the 10-day volume-weighted average trading price prior to issuance. On May 10, 2024, the Company and Sklar amended the note, extending its maturity date to December 31, 2024. The note was fully repaid in 2024 using proceeds from the Gibraltar Loan, and the Company no longer has any obligations for this note.
As of December 31, 2024 and 2023, the outstanding principal owed to Mr. Sklar under the referenced notes amounted to $2,472,500 and $4,472,500, respectively.
Loan and Security Agreement - Related Party
On May 24, 2024, (i) STCB, (ii) and each of STCB’s subsidiaries, Whipshots Holdings, Whipshots, AOS, Skylar, and Soylent (collectively, the “Borrowers” and each individually, a “Borrower”), and (iii) Gibraltar Business Capital, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the “Lender” or “Gibraltar”) entered into a Loan and Security Agreement (the “Loan and Security Agreement”), allowing STCB to reduce a portion of its long term debt (including retiring that certain revolving credit commitment which bore interest at a rate per annum equal to the greater of (a) two and half percent (2.5%) and (b) prime rate plus one percent (1%), which expanded its access to working capital. Capitalized terms not otherwise defined have the meanings set forth in the Loan and Security Agreement.
The Loan and Security Agreement provides for a revolving line of credit in the amount not to exceed $12.5 million at any one time, or the Revolving Loan Commitment Amount in return for a first priority security interest in the Collateral. The Revolving Commitment Amount is supplemented by a Permitted Overadvance Amount of $1.5 million. The first $1.5 million in Revolving Loans drawn on this line will be considered permitted overadvances, and the Permitted Overadvance Amount shall be reduced by $125,000 beginning on June 1, 2024, and the first day of each month thereafter. The aggregate principal balance of all Revolving Loans outstanding at any time shall not exceed the Revolving Loan Availability, which is equal to the lesser of the Revolving Loan Commitment Amount or the Borrowing Base Amount; if the aggregate principal balance does exceed the availability, the Company shall immediately make a repayment to eliminate such excess. The Revolving Line matures on May 24, 2026, and such Maturity Date will be automatically extended for one (1) year, subject to the satisfaction of certain terms and conditions described in the Loan and Security Agreement.
Each Revolving Loan advanced under the Revolving Loan Commitment bears interest at a rate per annum equal to One Month Term SOFR plus the Applicable Margin. If a Revolving Loan or any portion thereof is considered a part of the Permitted Overadvance Amount under the Loan and Security Agreement, the Applicable Margin for such loan shall be increased by an additional two percent (2.00%) per annum. Revolving Loans may be repaid at any time and reborrowed up to but not including the Maturity Date. On the Maturity Date, the outstanding aggregate principal balance of all Revolving Loans shall be due and payable. The interest rate for the revolving loan was 10.00% as of December 31, 2024.
Accrued and unpaid interest on the unpaid principal balance of the Revolving Loans shall be due and payable commencing on June 1, 2024 and on the first date of each calendar month thereafter. All accrued and unpaid interest shall be due and payable on the maturity date.
Subject to the satisfaction of certain terms and conditions described in the Loan and Security Agreement, the Borrowers may request to increase the Revolving Loan Commitment by an aggregate amount not less than $1 million not exceeding $2.5 million. Such request may be accepted by Lender in its sole and absolute discretion.
The Loan and Security Agreement contains customary limitations, including limitations on indebtedness, liens, fundamental changes to business or organizational structure, investments, loans, advances, guarantees, and acquisitions, asset sales, dividends, stock repurchases, stock redemptions, and the redemption, payment or prepayment of other debt, and transactions with affiliates. We are also subject to financial covenants, including a minimum EBITDA covenant and a maximum Unfinanced Capital Expenditures covenant.
The Loan and Security Agreement also contains customary events of default, including nonpayment of principal, interest, fees, or other amounts when due, violation of covenants, breaches of representations or warranties, cross defaults, change of control, insolvency, bankruptcy events, and material judgments. Some of these events of default allow for grace periods or are qualified by materiality concepts. Upon the occurrence of an event of default, the outstanding obligations under the Loan and Security Agreement may be accelerated and become due and payable immediately. As of December 31, 2024, the Company had several Events of Default under the Loan and Security Agreement, due to reporting deficiencies and failure to maintain the minimum EBITDA financial covenant. The Company is not in payment default. The Company is exploring options with Lender to reset the financial covenant in line with its current forecast and Lender is in discussions with the Company regarding a waiver of existing defaults. The balance of the revolving loan was $3,917,956 with a debt discount of $266,626, for a net balance of $3,651,330, with interest expense on the loan for the year ended December 31, 2024 of $395,184.
Going Concern
The audited consolidated financial statements contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K have been prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. The Company identified that a substantial doubt exists if the Company is able to meet its obligations as they become due within one year of the date of the financial statements being issued. Principal conditions that gave rise to the substantial doubt include, the Company historically incurring net losses as indicated in the Company’s accumulated deficit of $81,420,357 at December 31, 2024 including the impact of its net loss of $17,334,549 for the year ended December 31, 2024 and a working capital deficiency of approximately $14.2 million at December 31, 2024. Management evaluated the principal conditions that initially give rise to the substantial doubt and note that the historical net losses and accumulated deficit impact are primarily made up of non-cash expenses or one-time non-recurring expenses, such as goodwill impairment, stock-based compensation expense, fair value share adjustment loss and acquisition transaction expenses. Total debt of $6,174,313 on the balance sheet as of December 31, 2024 includes $2,472,500 of notes payable to the Company’s CEO, Ross Sklar, who has a large minority ownership of the Company which provides potential incentive for Mr. Sklar to extend or refinance such notes before the notes become due, as such notes have historically been extended and refinanced (see Note 9). Management plans include, (i) continuing to increase net cash provided by operating activities, which was $2,215,446 for the year ended December 31, 2024, while decreasing net cash provided by financing activities, and (ii) obtaining an alternative financing source to pay off all current debt outstanding and provide additional working capital, if needed. In order to achieve these plans, management has created and approved plans to increase top line revenue for each segment, while decreasing overall expenses as a percent of revenue, which will be realized through realizing synergies from the acquisitions of AOS, Skylar and Soylent, while utilizing the Company’s back-end shared service model to reduce expenses. The Company is in ongoing negotiations to obtain additional financing to clear historical debt and provide additional working capital. These conditions and the ability to successfully resolve these factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The consolidated financial statements of the Company do not include any adjustments that may result from the outcome of these aforementioned uncertainties.
Working Capital Deficit
December 31, December 31,
Current assets $ 17,818,439 $ 25,235,590
Current liabilities 32,011,304 57,672,403
Working capital deficiency $ (14,192,865 ) $ (32,436,813 )
The decrease in current assets is primarily due to a decrease in accounts receivable of $1,864,908, a decrease in prepaid expenses of $2,197,196 as well as a decrease in inventory on hand of $2,425,895. The decrease in current liabilities is primarily a result of a decrease in fair value of share adjustment of $27,631,627, the repayment of a line of credit balance of $3,835,247 from the prior year and the repayment of notes payable-related parties of approximately $2,000,000, offset by an increase in accounts payable/accounts payable-related parties of $2,344,959 and the addition of the revolving loan of $3,651,330.
Cash Flows
Year Ended
December 31,
Net cash provided by operating activities $ 2,215,446 $ 686,657
Net cash used in investing activities (439,325 ) (230,007 )
Net cash used in financing activities (2,329,940 ) (175,796 )
(Decrease) Increase in cash
$ (553,819 ) $ 280,854
Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities was $2,215,446 for the year ended December 31, 2024 and was primarily due to a combined decrease in accounts receivable and accounts receivable-related parties of $2,240,241, a decrease in inventory in the amount of $2,425,895 and a combined increase in accounts payable and accounts payable-related parties of $2,344,959. The net loss for the year of $17,334,549 was mostly offset by non-cash expenses of goodwill impairment, amortization of intangible assets and fair value share adjustment gain in the amounts of $14,327,871, $2,831,972 and $10,544,263, respectively.
Net cash provided by operating activities was $686,657 for the year ended December 31, 2023 and was primarily due to a net loss of decrease of inventory in the amount of $5,674,096, which was partially offset by an increase of accounts receivable of $1,767,793 and an increase in prepaid expenses of $785,943. The net loss for the year ended $46,402,121 was mostly offset by non-cash expenses of goodwill, stock-based compensation and amortization of intangible assets in the amounts of $29,612,700, $10,469,018 and $2,802,685, respectively.
Investing Activities
Net cash used in investing activities was $439,325 for the year ended December 31, 2024 and was primarily due to cash paid for purchase of property and equipment of $310,590.
Net cash used in investing activities was $230,007 for the year ended December 31, 2023 and was primarily due to cash paid for purchase of intangibles of $336,670.
Financing Activities
For the year ended December 31, 2024, net cash used in financing activities was $2,329,940 which primarily resulted from $3,541,543 of net proceeds from the revolving loan, offset by payments made on loans from related parties and on the line of credit of $2,000,000 and $3,835,247, respectively.
For the year ended December 31, 2023, net cash used in financing activities was $175,796 which primarily resulted from $964,753 of net payments on the line of credit and $131,400 of repurchases of common stock, partially offset by $800,000 of loan advances from Ross Sklar and $127,148 of borrowings for insurance policies.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We have not entered into any off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources and would be considered material to investors.
Effects of Inflation
Inflationary factors such as increases in the costs to acquire goods and overhead costs may adversely affect our operating results. Although we do not believe that inflation has had a material impact on our financial position or results of operations to date, a high rate of inflation in the future may have an adverse effect on our ability to maintain current levels of gross margin and selling, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of revenues if the selling prices of our services do not increase with these increased costs.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Our Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared in conformity with US GAAP. The preparation of our Consolidated Financial Statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, costs, expense and related disclosures. These estimates and assumptions are often based on historical experience and judgements that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances at the time made. However, all such estimates and assumptions are inherently uncertain and unpredictable, and actual results may differ. It is possible that other professionals, applying their own judgement to the same facts and circumstances, could develop and support alternative estimates and assumptions that could result in material changes to our operating results and financial condition. We evaluate our estimates and assumptions on an ongoing basis.
We consider our critical accounting estimates to include the assumptions and estimates associated with timing for revenue recognition, testing of goodwill and intangibles for impairment, recoverability of long-lived assets, estimating the allowance for doubtful accounts, determining the net realizable value of inventory, assessing the value of certain share-based adjustments, income taxes, fair value of contributed services, and assumptions used in the Black-Scholes valuation methods, such as expected volatility, risk-free interest rate and expected dividend rate. Our significant accounting policies are more fully described in the notes to our Consolidated Financial Statements. We believe that the following accounting policies and estimates are critical to our business operations and understanding our financial results.
Acquisition Accounting
We account for acquisitions in accordance with the acquisition method of accounting pursuant to ASC 805, Business Combinations. Accordingly, for each acquisition, we record the fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed as of the acquisition date and recognize the excess of the consideration paid over the fair value of the net assets acquired as goodwill. For each acquisition, the fair value of assets acquired, and liabilities assumed is determined based on assumptions that reasonable market participants would use to value the assets in the principal (or most advantageous) market.
In determining the fair value of the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed in connection with acquisitions, management engages third-party valuation experts. Management is responsible for these internal and third-party valuations and appraisals.
Revenue Recognition
STCB, excluding its subsidiaries, earns a majority of its revenues through the sale of food products, primarily through Winona. Revenue from retail sales is recognized at shipment to the retailer.
AOS, one of STCB’s wholly owned subsidiaries, earns its revenues through the sale of premium body and skincare products. Revenue from retail sales is recognized at shipment to the retailer. Revenue from eCommerce sales, including Amazon Fulfillment by Amazon (“Amazon FBA”), is recognized upon shipment of merchandise or FOB destination.
Skylar, one of STCB’s wholly owned subsidiaries, earns its revenues through the sale of fragrances. Revenue from retail sales is recognized at shipment to the retailer. Revenue from eCommerce sales, including Amazon FBA, is recognized either upon shipment of merchandise or FOB destination.
Soylent, one of STCB’s wholly owned subsidiaries, earns its revenues through the sale of nutritional drinks. Revenue from retail sales is recognized at shipment to the retailer. Revenue from eCommerce sales, is recognized upon shipment of merchandise.
Whipshots, an 85% owned subsidiary, earns its revenues as royalties from the licensing agreements it has with Temperance, a related entity. STCB licenses the right for Temperance to manufacture and sell vodka infused whipped cream. The amount of the licensing revenue received varies depending upon the product and the royalty percentage is based on contractual terms. The Company recognizes its revenue under these licensing agreements only when sales are made by Temperance to a third party.
The Company applies the following five-step model in order to determine this amount: (i) identify the contract with a customer; (ii) identify the performance obligation in the contract; (iii) determine the transaction price, including the constraint on variable consideration; (iv) allocation of the transaction price to the performance obligations; and (v) recognition of revenue when (or as) the Company satisfies each performance obligation.
The Company only applies the five-step model to contracts when it is probable that the entity will collect the consideration it is entitled to in exchange for the licensee transferring goods or services to the customer. Once a contract is determined to be within the scope of ASC 606 at contract inception, the Company reviews the contract to determine which performance obligations the Company’s licensee must deliver and which of these performance obligations are distinct. The Company recognizes as revenues the amount of the transaction price that is allocated to the respective performance obligation when the performance obligation is satisfied or as it is satisfied. Generally, the Company’s licensee’s performance obligations are transferred to customers at a point in time, typically upon delivery.
Goodwill Impairment
Goodwill as of the acquisition date is measured as the excess of consideration transferred over the net of the acquisition date fair values of the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed. While we use our best estimates and assumptions to accurately value assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the acquisition date, our estimates are inherently uncertain and subject to refinement.
We review goodwill for impairment at least annually or more frequently if indicators of impairment exist. Our goodwill impairment test may require the use of qualitative judgements and fair-value techniques, which are inherently subjective. Impairment loss, if any, is recorded when the fair value of goodwill is less than its carrying value for each reporting unit.
The Company experienced triggering events in 2024 due to lower than expected revenue for each segment, prompting impairment assessments of goodwill as of November 31, 2024.
The Company engaged a third-party valuation firm to determine the fair value of the reporting units under ASC 350. The Company recorded total goodwill impairment losses in the amount of $14,327,871 for the year ended December 31, 2024. The goodwill impairment losses are allocated as follows: $2,944,871 to the Starco Brands segment and $11,383,000 to the Soylent segment.
The Company experienced triggering events in 2023 due to lower-than-expected revenue for each segment, prompting impairment assessments of goodwill as of November 30, 2023.
The Company engaged a third-party valuation firm to determine the fair value of the reporting units under ASC 350. The Company recorded total goodwill impairment losses in the amount of $29,612,700 for the year ended December 31, 2023. The goodwill impairment losses are attributable as follows to the following segments: $9,145,000 to the Starco Brands segment and $20,467,700 to the Soylent segment.
As of December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023, goodwill was $12,361,520 and $26,689,391, respectively.
Recoverability of Long-Lived Assets
We review intangible assets, property, equipment and software with finite lives for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset or asset group to future undiscounted cash flows that the asset or asset group is expected to generate. If assets are determined to be impaired, the impairment loss to be recognized equals the amount by which the carrying value of the asset or group of assets exceeds its fair value. Significant estimates include but are not limited to future expected cash flows, replacement cost and discount rates.
The Company experienced triggering events in 2024 due to lower-than-expected revenue for the AOS component of its Starco Brands segment, prompting a qualitative impairment assessment of its definite-lived intangible assets as of November 30, 2024. The Company recorded a loss on impairment for the definite-lived intangible assets of its AOS subsidiary in the net amount of $13,304 for the year ended December 31, 2024.
During the year ended December 31, 2023, the Company did not record asset impairment charges related to its intangible assets.
Accounts Receivable
We measure accounts receivable at net realizable value. This value includes an appropriate allowance for credit losses to present the net amount expected to be collected on the financial asset. We calculate the allowance for credit losses based on available relevant information, in addition to historical loss information, the level of past-due accounts based on the contractual terms of the receivables, and our relationships with, and the economic status of, our partners and customers.
Inventory
Inventory consists of premium body and skincare products, fragrances and nutritional products. Inventory is measured using the first-in, first-out method and stated at average cost as of December 31, 2024. The value of inventories is reduced for excess and obsolete inventories. We monitor inventory to identify events that would require impairment due to obsolete inventory and adjust the value of inventory when required.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
We follow paragraph 825-10-50-10 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for disclosures about fair value of its financial instruments and paragraph 820-10-35-37 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Paragraph 820-10-35-37”) to measure the fair value of its financial instruments. Paragraph 820-10-35-37 establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (U.S. GAAP) and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. To increase consistency and comparability in fair value measurements and related disclosures, Paragraph 820-10-35-37 establishes a fair value hierarchy which prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three (3) broad levels. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs. The three (3) levels of fair value hierarchy defined by Paragraph 820-10-35-37 are described below:
Level 1: Quoted market prices available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the reporting date.
Level 2: Pricing inputs other than quoted prices in active markets included in Level 1, which are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reporting date.
Level 3: Pricing inputs that are generally unobservable inputs and not corroborated by market data.
The carrying amount of our consolidated financial assets and liabilities, such as cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable, prepaid expenses, and accrued expenses approximate their fair value because of the short maturity of those instruments. Our notes payable approximate the fair value of such instruments based upon management’s best estimate of interest rates that would be available to the Company for similar financial arrangements at December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023.
We may be required to contemplate the fair value of certain share-based adjustments, which require assumptions about market conditions, volatility and other relevant factors which are often obtained from third-party valuation firms. Significant changes to any unobservable input may result in a significant change in the fair value measurement.
Income Taxes
The Company follows Section 740-10-30 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification, which requires recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the consolidated financial statements or tax returns. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are based on the differences between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the fiscal year in which the differences are expected to reverse. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance to the extent management concludes it is more likely than not that the assets will not be realized. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the fiscal years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in the Statements of Income in the period that includes the enactment date.
The Company adopted section 740-10-25 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Section 740-10-25”) with regards to uncertainty income taxes. Section 740-10-25 addresses the determination of whether tax benefits claimed or expected to be claimed on a tax return should be recorded in the consolidated financial statements. Under Section 740-10-25, the Company may recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the consolidated financial statements from such a position should be measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than fifty percent (50%) likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement. Section 740-10-25 also provides guidance on de-recognition, classification, interest and penalties on income taxes, accounting in interim periods and requires increased disclosures. The Company had no material adjustments to its liabilities for unrecognized income tax benefits according to the provisions of Section 740-10-25.
Contributed Services
The Company uses contributed services from related parties on an as needed basis for a portion of Company operations. Depending on the amount of time related parties spend working on STCB, the Company allocates a percentage of the related parties’ salaries to be accounted for as contributed services expense.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
The Company has implemented all new accounting pronouncements that are in effect. These pronouncements did not have any material impact on the consolidated financial statements unless otherwise disclosed, and the Company does not believe that there are any other new accounting pronouncements that have been issued that might have a material impact on its consolidated financial position or results of operations.

---

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Not applicable.

---

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
The financial statements required by this Item 8 of this Annual Report are included in this Annual Report following Item 16 (“Form 10-K Summary”). As a smaller reporting company, we are not required to provide supplementary financial information.

---

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS
Item 9. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures (as that term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act), that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures. In designing disclosure controls and procedures, our management necessarily was required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible disclosure controls and procedures. The design of any disclosure controls and procedures also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. Any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance of achieving the desired control objectives.
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, we are required to perform an evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act, as of December 31, 2024.
Management has completed such evaluation and has concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by us in reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures. As a result of the material weakness in internal controls over financial reporting described below, we concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2024 were not effective.
Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Our internal control over financial reporting is a process designed under the supervision of our principal executive and principal financial officer and effected by our Board, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of our consolidated financial statements for external reporting purposes in accordance with GAAP.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. In addition, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Material Weaknesses in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2024 based on the framework established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this assessment, management has determined that our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2024 was not effective.
A material weakness, as defined in the standards established by the Sarbanes-Oxley is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of our annual or interim consolidated financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.
The ineffectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting was due to a material weakness related to lack of corporate documentation, which we had previously reported as of December 31, 2023 and 2022, and lack of segregation of duties which has not been remediated as of December 31, 2024.
Management’s Plan to Remediate Material Weaknesses
During the year ended December 31, 2024, management has been implementing and continues to implement measures designed to ensure that control deficiencies contributing to the material weakness are remediated, such that these controls are designed, implemented, and operating effectively. The remediation actions include:
● Engagement of separate external financial consulting firms to continue to enhance financial reporting, financial operations, internal controls including segregation of duties; as well as improve tax analysis, fair value estimates and reporting;
● Expansion of the Board to four (4) directors in 2024, including two (2) non-management directors, each of which are serving as a financial expert to sit on the Audit Committee; and
● Management plans to develop formal policies and procedures over accounting and reporting.
Management will continue to monitor and evaluate the effectiveness of our internal controls and procedures over financial reporting on an ongoing basis and is committed to taking further action and implementing additional enhancements or improvements, as necessary and as funds allow.
This Annual Report does not include an attestation report of our independent registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by our independent registered public accounting firm pursuant to rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that exempt smaller reporting companies from this requirement.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Other than described above there have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during our fourth quarter of 2024 that have materially affected, or that are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

---

ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Item 9A. Other Information
None.

---

ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 9B. Disclosures Regarding Foreign Jurisdictions that Prevent Inspections
Not applicable.
PART III

---

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
Directors and Executive Officers
The following table sets forth the names and ages of our current directors and named executive officers. Our bylaws require that the total number of directors constituting our Board shall be not less than one (1) nor more than seven (7), to serve until the earlier occurrence of the election of his or her successor at the next meeting of stockholders, death, resignation or removal by the Board. Our executive officers are appointed by our Board and serve at its discretion. There are no family relationships among our directors, executive officers, or director nominees.
Name
Age
Position
Term of Director/Officer
Ross Sklar
President, CEO, Interim Chief Financial Officer, Director and Chairman of the Board
Officer: August 2017 until successor is duly appointed and qualified
Director: August 2015 until successor is duly elected and qualified
Interim CFO: November 2024 until successor is duly appointed and qualified
Darin Brown
Chief Operating Officer, Secretary, and Director
Officer: June 2023 until successor is duly appointed and qualified
Director: June 2020 until successor is duly elected and qualified
David Dreyer
Chief Marketing Officer
June 2023 until successor is duly appointed and qualified
Bharat Vasan
Director, Audit Committee Chair
March 2024 until successor is duly elected and qualified
Joe Schimmelpfennig
Director, Audit Committee member
July 2024 until successor is duly elected and qualified
Ross Sklar - Director, Chief Executive Officer and Interim-Chief Financial Officer
Ross Sklar was appointed to fill a vacancy on our Board on August 13, 2015. Mr. Sklar is the founder and current Chief Executive Officer of The Starco Group, located in Los Angeles, California. On August 9, 2017, Mr. Sklar was appointed President and Chief Executive Officer of Starco Brands. On November 8, 2024, Mr. Sklar was appointed interim-Chief Financial Officer. He started The Starco Group in January 2010. The Starco Group is a diversified aerosol and liquid fill producer of private label and branded industrial and consumer products that manufactures for almost every consumer category. For over 20 years Mr. Sklar has developed technology in industrial and consumer markets. He holds a Bachelor’s degree in Political Science from the University of Manitoba.
Darin Brown - Director, Chief Operating Officer
Darin Brown joined the Company as a Director on June 4, 2020, and was appointed as its Chief Operating Officer and Secretary on June 8, 2023. Mr. Brown has over 20 years of experience in chemical operations and consumer package goods distribution. He also currently serves as a Board member for The Starco Group. Mr. Brown has exceptional leadership experience, having overseen teams of over 200 people during his time at The Starco Group.
David Dreyer - Chief Marketing Officer
David Dreyer joined the Company as an Executive Vice President of Marketing on June 4, 2020 and began performing as our chief marketing officer in February 2022. The Board officially appointed Mr. Dreyer to his position as Chief Marketing Officer on June 8, 2023. Mr. Dreyer brings over 20 years of experience working with Blue Chip Brands to the team at Starco Brands. Upon receiving his MS in Integrated Marketing from Northwestern University, Dreyer started his career with Honda and internet pioneer Stamps.com. Dreyer then migrated over to the agency side of the business, working for industry standouts Deutsch, TBWA/Chiat/Day, The Woo and Media Arts Lab. His roster of brands that he has worked with also speaks for itself, as Dreyer feels privileged to have worked with brands such as Apple, Pepsi, Pizza Hut, Dr. Pepper, Snapple, Infinity, The GRAMMY’s, Jimmy Dean and TOMS. In his spare time, Dreyer is a Professor of Advertising at USC’s Annenberg School for Communication, where he loves introducing students to the world of advertising and helping them find their footing in the industry.
Bharat Vasan - Director
Bharat Vasan is an experienced Board member (Chair of Audit Committee), executive and investor, with more than 15 years of leading businesses across multiple industries, including in consumer packaged goods, digital health, software, electronics and games. Mr. Vasan has a track record of growing and scaling businesses across different stages of their lifecycle, including raising capital, and mergers and acquisitions. Mr. Vasan was previously President and Chief Operating Officer of The Production Board (“TPB”), a San Francisco-based venture capital firm. At TPB, Mr. Vasan sat on private and public boards, including Uplifting Results Labs and TPB Acquisition Corp I. Prior to joining TPB, Mr. Vasan was the Chief Executive Officer and Board Member of PAX Labs and, prior to that, led multiple businesses to successful financings and acquisitions, including as the President and Chief Operating Officer at August Home (acquired by Assa Abloy), and as the co-founder and Chief Operating Officer of BASIS Science (acquired by Intel, Inc.). Mr. Vasan also played various roles in corporate development and executive leadership at Electronic Arts. He is active with non-profit causes and currently sits on the Board of the San Francisco Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (SPCA). Mr. Vasan received his undergraduate degree from Middlebury College and his graduate degree from Columbia University.
Joe Schimmelpfennig - Director
Joe Schimmelpfennig is an experienced investment banking and finance executive with more than 30 years of experience successfully building and scaling a consumer investment banking team as well as executing transactions. During that time, Mr. Schimmelpfennig has successfully closed sell-side and buy-side M&A transactions, minority equity and debt capital raises, and has lead managed and co-managed public offerings for a number of companies in the consumer sector. Mr. Schimmelpfennig is currently the Head of Consumer Investment Banking at D.A. Davidson, a middle market investment banking firm. Prior to joining D.A. Davidson, Mr. Schimmelpfennig was the Head of Investment Banking and the Consumer Group at Wunderlich Securities, which was majority-owned and managed by Altamont Capital Partners and acquired by B. Riley Financial in 2017. Mr. Schimmelpfennig received his bachelor’s degree in Business Administration & Economics from Coe College.
Board Composition, Committees and Director Selection
The Board currently consists of four (4) directors. Members of the Board regularly discuss various business matters informally on numerous occasions throughout the year. During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024, the Board met two times and acted by unanimous written consent six times. All current directors attended 100% of the meetings of the Board in 2024 for the periods in which they were serving as a director. We do not have a policy regarding Board members’ attendance at meetings of stockholders.
Our Board maintains certain standing committees consisting of Board members. The Board has three separate standing committees: (i) the compensation committee (“Compensation Committee”), (ii) audit committee (“Audit Committee”) and (iii) nominating and corporate governance committee (“Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee”).
Our Board does not have a formal policy on whether the roles of Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board should be separate. However, Mr. Sklar currently serves as both Chief Executive Officers and Chairman. Our Board reviews its leadership structure and believes at this time that the Company and its stockholders are best served by having the CEO serve in both positions. Combining the roles fosters accountability, effective decision-making and alignment between interests of our Board and management. Our Board currently has no lead independent director. Our Board expects to periodically review its leadership structure to ensure that it continues to meet the Company’s needs.
Our Audit Committee currently consists of Bharat Vasan and Joe Schimmelpfennig, with Mr. Vasan serving as Chair. The Board has determined that both members are qualified as ‘audit committee financial experts’ and meet the definition of ‘independent’ under the applicable rules established by the SEC. The Audit Committee assists the Board in its oversight responsibilities relating to the integrity of our financial statements, our compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, our independent auditor’s qualifications and independence, and the establishment and performance of our internal audit function, and the performance of the independent auditor. The Audit Committee was formed in May 2024.
Our Compensation Committee currently consists of Bharat Vasan and Darin Brown. The Compensation Committee is authorized to review our compensation and benefits plans to ensure they meet our corporate objectives, approve the compensation structure of our executive officers, evaluate our executive officers’ performance, and advise on salary, bonus and other incentive and equity compensation. The Compensation Committee was created in May 2024.
Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee currently consists of Bharat Vasan. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is primarily concerned with identifying individuals qualified to become members of our Board, selection of the director candidates to fill any vacancies on our Board and the development of our corporate governance guidelines and principles.
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee identifies individuals qualified to become members of our Board through recommendations from members of the Committee and other Board members and executive officers of the Company and will consider candidates who are recommended by stockholders, as described below. These factors focus on skills, expertise or background and may include decision-making ability, judgment, personal integrity and reputation, experience with businesses and other organizations of comparable size, and the extent to which the candidate would be a desirable addition to the Board and any committees of the Board.
Involvement in Certain Legal Proceedings
None of our officers, directors, promoters or control persons have participated in any of the following activities in the past ten years:
(1) Any bankruptcy petition filed by or against any business of which such person was a general partner or executive officer either at the time of the bankruptcy or within two years prior to that time;
(2) Any conviction in a criminal proceeding or being subject to a pending criminal proceeding (excluding traffic violations and other minor offenses);
(3) Being subject to any order, judgment or decree, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, or any court of competent jurisdiction, permanently or temporarily enjoining, barring, suspending or otherwise limiting his involvement in any type of business, securities or banking activities; or
(4) Being found by a court of competent jurisdiction (in a civil action), the Commission or the Commodity Futures Trading Commission to have violated a federal or state securities or commodities law, and the judgment has not been reversed, suspended, or vacated.
Compliance with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act
Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires our directors, executive officers and persons who own more than ten percent of our common stock, to file with the SEC initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership of common stock. Officers, directors and ten-percent or greater beneficial owners are required by SEC regulations to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) reports they file. Based upon a review of those forms and representations regarding the need for filing for the year ended December 31, 2024, we believe all necessary forms have been filed.
Corporate Governance and Code of Ethics
The role of the Board is to ensure that the Company is managed for the long-term benefit of our stockholders. To fulfill this role, the Board has adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Statement of Policy Concerning Trading in Company Securities that applies to all our employees, directors and officers, including those officers responsible for financial reporting.

---

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Item 11. Executive Compensation
The table below outlines the cash compensation of the Company’s executive officers for the past two fiscal years.
SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
Name and principal position
Year
Salary ($)(1)
Bonus ($)
Stock Awards ($)
Option Awards ($)
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($)
Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings ($)
All Other Compensation ($)
Total ($)
Ross Sklar,
$ 120,000
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ 120,000
CEO, CFO(2), Director
$ 120,000
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ 120,000
Darin Brown,
$ 270,000
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ 270,000
VP, Director
$ 102,000
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ 102,000
Kevin Zaccardi,
$ 269,641
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ 269,641
CFO(3)
$ 230,823
-
-
-
-
-
-
$ 230,823
Demir Vangelov,
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
Director(4)
$ 119,429
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ 119,429
David Dreyer,
$ 225,000
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ 225,000
VP
$ 300,000
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ 300,000
Bharat Vasan,
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
Director
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
Joe Schimmelpfennig,
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
Director
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
(1) Prior to October 1, 2023 compensation reported under Salary was payable to the officers under consulting compensation as 1099-NEC wages.
(2) Effective November 8, 2024, Mr. Sklar was appointed as our Interim-Chief Financial Officer.
(3) Effective November 8, 2024, Mr. Zaccardi resigned as our acting Chief Financial Officer.
(4) Mr. Vangelov was removed as a director effective April 18, 2024 and did not serve as an officer of the Company in 2024.
Employment Agreements
STCB has no formal employment agreements, other than at-will offer letters, in place at this time.
Director Compensation
The Company has no arrangements in place to compensate its directors for services rendered in their capacity as directors, including participation in committees or undertaking special assignments.

---

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
Securities Under Equity Compensation Plans
On November 27, 2023, our Board adopted an equity compensation plan (the “Equity Plan”) for employees and service providers of the Company, which authorized 100,000,000 shares of our Class A common stock. On March 18, 2024, certain stockholders constituting a majority of the voting rights of the Class A common stock, approved by written consent in lieu of a special meeting the stockholders the Equity Plan. The Company filed a Schedule 14C Definitive Information Statement (a “Definitive 14C”) relating to such corporate action on March 29, 2024, which became effective April 18, 2024.
Beneficial Ownership
The following table lists the beneficial ownership of our outstanding Class A common stock by our management and each person or group known to us to own beneficially more than 5% of our voting common stock. Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the SEC and generally includes voting or investment power with respect to securities. Based on these rules, two or more persons may be deemed to be the beneficial owners of the same securities. Except as indicated by footnote, the persons named in the table below have sole voting power and investment power with respect to the shares of Class A common stock shown as beneficially owned by them. The percentage of beneficial ownership is based on 647,431,696 shares of common stock outstanding as of April 16, 2025.
Title of Class Name of
Beneficial Owner
Amount of
Beneficial
Ownership
Percent of Class
Class A common stock Ross Sklar 93,519,836 14.4 %
Class A common stock David Dreyer 4,250,000 0.7 %
Class A common stock Darin Brown 2,000,000 0.3 %
Class A common stock Bharat Vasan - - %
Class A common stock Joe Schimmelpfennig - - %
Class A common stock GV 2016 GP, L.L.C. 99,510,805 (1) 15.4 %
Class A common stock Andreessen Horowitz Fund IV, L.P. 80,041,025 (2) 12.4 %
Class A common stock The Production Board, LLC 61,696,700 (3) 9.5 %
Class A common stock Upfront VI LP 33,255,723 5.1 %
Class A common stock Hamilton Start LLC 32,472,426 5.0 %
Directors and executive officers as a group (5 persons) 99,769,836 15.4 %
(1) GV 2016 GP, L.L.C. holds these shares indirectly through GV 2016, L.P. GV 2016 GP, L.L.C.’s shares are subject to that certain Voting Agreement, by and among Starco Brands, Inc., Ross Sklar, and the stockholders of the Company listed on Schedule A thereto, dated February 15, 2023, as may be amended from time to time.
(2) Andreessen Horowitz Fund IV, L.P.’s shares are subject to that certain Voting Agreement, by and among Starco Brands, Inc., Ross Sklar, and the stockholders of the Company listed on Schedule A thereto, dated February 15, 2023, as may be amended from time to time.
(3) The Production Board, LLC’s shares are subject to that certain Voting Agreement, by and among Starco Brands, Inc., Ross Sklar, and the stockholders of the Company listed on Schedule A thereto, dated February 15, 2023, as may be amended from time to time.

---

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
Related Party Transactions
The following information summarizes transactions we have either engaged in for the past two fiscal years or propose to engage in, involving our executive officers, directors, more than 5% stockholders, or immediate family members of these people. These transactions were negotiated between related parties without “arm’s length” bargaining and, as a result, the terms of these transactions may be different than transactions negotiated between unrelated persons.
Ross Sklar, CEO Notes
On January 24, 2020, STCB executed a promissory note (“January 24, 2020 Note”), for $100,000 with Ross Sklar, CEO. The January 24, 2020 Note bore interest at 4% per annum, compounded monthly, was unsecured, and had a maturity date of two years from the original date of issuance. On July 19, 2022, the Company and Mr. Sklar, agreed to amend and restate the January 24, 2020 Note. Mr. Sklar agreed to extend the term of the January 24, 2020 Note through the entry into a First Amended and Restated Promissory Note (the “Amended Note”) in exchange for the Company paying the accrued and unpaid interest under the January 24, 2020 Note, including during the period following the initial maturity date of the January 24, 2020 Note (January 24, 2022 through July 19, 2022). In exchange for extending the term, Mr. Sklar waived the default interest rate of ten percent (10%) and agreed to interest accrual at the standard four percent (4%) rate during the period following the initial maturity date. The Amended Note carried a guaranteed 4% interest rate, had a maturity date of July 19, 2024, and a 10% interest rate on a default of repayment at maturity. The Company, at its option, could prepay the Amended Note, in whole or in part, without prepayment penalty of any kind, and the obligations under the Amended Note would accelerate in full upon an Event of Default (as defined in the Amended Note).
On June 28, 2021, STCB executed a second promissory note (“June 28, 2021 Note”), with Mr. Sklar in the principal amount of $100,000 with the same terms as the January 24, 2020 Note and a maturity date of June 28, 2023. On September 17, 2021, STCB executed a third promissory note (“September 17, 2021 Note”), with Mr. Sklar in the principal amount of $500,000 with the same terms as the January 24, 2020 Note and a maturity date of September 17, 2023. On December 13, 2021, STCB executed a fourth promissory note (“December 13, 2021 Note”), with Mr. Sklar in the principal amount of $500,000 with the same terms as the January 24, 2020 Note and a maturity date of December 12, 2023.
On February 14, 2022, STCB executed a fifth promissory note (“February 14, 2022 Note”), in favor of Mr. Sklar, in the principal sum of $472,500, in exchange for a cash advance in the amount of $300,000 and payment of Company costs in the amount of $172,500. As with the January 24, 2020 note between the Company and Sklar, the February 14, 2022 Note bears interest at 4% per annum, is unsecured, and had a maturity date of two years from the original date of issuance. This note may also convert into shares of Company Class A common stock at the 10-day volume weighted average trading price of the Company Class A common stock for the 10-day period prior to the issuance of the Note, which was calculated as $0.29 per share.
On December 29, 2022 STCB entered into a financing transaction with Mr. Sklar consisting of a secured promissory note (the “December 29, 2022 Note”), warrants (the “December 29, 2022 Warrants”) to purchase common stock of the Company (the “Common Stock”), and a security agreement (the “December 29, 2022 Security Agreement”) to secure the obligations under the December 29, 2022 Note (the foregoing agreements and transactions contemplated thereby, collectively, the “December 29 Financing”). The entry into the December 29 Financing was approved by the disinterested directors of the Company and was entered into to provide the Company with short-term liquidity to fund non-ordinary course business transactions and acquisitions.
The December 29, 2022 Note executed by STCB had a principal sum of $2,000,000, and carried a floating interest rate comprised of the Wall Street Journal Prime Rate (re-assessed on the first day of each month) plus 4% (for a then current floating interest rate of 11.5%). The December 29, 2022 Note had a maturity date of August 1, 2023 and a default interest rate equal to the then current interest rate plus 5%. The Company, at its option, could prepay the December 29, 2022 Note, in whole or in part, without prepayment penalty of any kind. In connection with the December 29, 2022 Note, the Company entered into the December 29, 2022 Security Agreement to secure the December 29, 2022 Note obligations and issued the December 29, 2022 Warrants as a funding fee to obtain the loaned funds.
The December 29, 2022 Security Agreement, by and between the Company and Sklar was entered into to provide security interests to Sklar to secure the obligations underlying the December 29, 2022 Note. A security interest in the Collateral (as defined in the December 29, 2022 Security Agreement) was granted to Mr. Sklar to secure the repayment of all principal, interest, costs, expenses and other amounts then or thereafter due under the December 29, 2022 Note until repayment by the maturity date. Sklar was authorized to file financing statements to perfect the security interest in the Collateral without authentication by the Company.
The December 29, 2022 Warrants, consist of warrants to purchase 285,714 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.01 per share. The number of shares of common stock for which the December 29, 2022. Warrants are exercisable and the exercise price may be adjusted upon any event involving subdivisions, combinations, distributions, recapitalizations and like transactions. Pursuant to the December 29, 2022 Warrants, the warrant and the right to purchase securities upon the exercise of the December 29, 2022 Warrant will terminate on December 29, 2027. The December 29, 2022 Warrants are fully vested as of the date of grant and may be exercised through cash or cashless exercise.
On March 3, 2023 STCB entered into a financing transaction with Mr. Sklar consisting of a secured promissory note (the “March 3, 2023 Note”), warrants (the “March 3, 2023 Warrants”) to purchase Class A common stock of the Company (the “Class A common stock”), and a security agreement (the “March 3, 2023 Security Agreement”) to secure the obligations under the March 3, 2023 Note (the foregoing agreements and transactions contemplated thereby, collectively, the “March 3 Financing”). The entry into the March 3 Financing was approved by majority of the Board and entered into to provide the Company with short-term liquidity to fund non-ordinary course business transactions and liquidity of a wholly-owned subsidiary.
The March 3, 2023 Note executed by STCB had a principal sum of $800,000, and carried a floating interest rate comprised of the Wall Street Journal Prime Rate (re-assessed on the first day of each month) plus 4% (for a then current floating interest rate of 11.75%). The March 3, 2023 Note had a maturity date of July 1, 2023 and a default interest rate equal to the then current interest rate plus 5%. The Company, at its option, could prepay the March 3, 2023 Note, in whole or in part, without prepayment penalty of any kind. In connection with the March 3, 2023 Note, the Company entered into the March 3, 2023 Security Agreement to secure the March 3, 2023 Note obligations and issued the March 3, 2023 Warrants as a funding fee to obtain the loaned funds.
The March 3, 2023 Security Agreement, by and between the Company and Sklar was entered into to provide security interests to Sklar to secure the obligations underlying the March 3, 2023 Note. A security interest in the Collateral (as defined in the March 3, 2023 Security Agreement) was granted to Mr. Sklar to secure the repayment of all principal, interest, costs, expenses and other amounts then or thereafter due under the March 3, 2023 Note until by the maturity date. Sklar was authorized to file financing statements to perfect the security interest in the Collateral without authentication by the Company.
The March 3, 2023 Warrants, consist of warrants to purchase 114,286 shares of Class A common stock at an exercise price of $0.01 per share. The number of shares of Class A common stock for which the March 3, 2023 Warrants are exercisable and the exercise price may be adjusted upon any event involving subdivisions, combinations, distributions, recapitalizations and like transactions. Pursuant to the March 3, 2023 Warrants, the warrant and the right to purchase securities upon the exercise of the March 3, 2023 Warrant will terminate on March 2, 2028. The March 3, 2023 Warrants are fully vested as of the date of grant and may be exercised through cash or cashless exercise.
On August 11, 2023, the Company issued to Sklar a consolidated secured promissory note (the “Consolidated Secured Promissory Note”) in the principal sum of $4,000,000, with a maturity date of December 31, 2024. The Consolidated Secured Promissory Note carries a floating interest rate comprised of the Wall Street Journal Prime Rate (re-assessed on the first date of each month (plus 2%)) and is secured by an amended and restated consolidated security agreement (the “Amended and Restated Consolidated Security Agreement”), by and between the Company and Sklar, dated August 11, 2023, the Consolidated Secured Promissory Note consolidated the outstanding loan obligations of the Company to Sklar evidenced pursuant to the (i) Amended Note, (ii) the June 28, 2021 Note, (iii) the September 17, 2021 Note, (iv) the December 13, 2021 Note, (v) the December 29, 2022 Note, and (vi) the March 3, 2023 Note, as summarized in the table below. The Amended and Restated Consolidated Security Agreement merged and integrated the December 29, 2022 Security Agreement and the March 3, 2023 Security Agreement, and provides a security interest in the Collateral (as defined in the Amended and Restated Consolidated Security Agreement) to secure the repayment of all principal, interest, costs, expenses and other amounts then or thereafter due under the Consolidated Secured Promissory Note until by the maturity date. Sklar was authorized to file financing statements to perfect the security interest in the Collateral without authentication by the Company. The following table represents Prior Notes that were part of the restructuring and updated terms (under the Consolidated Secured Promissory Note):
Outstanding
Balance Original
maturity Original rate Revised
maturity Revised rate
January 24, 2020 Amended Note $ 100,000 7/19/2023 4 % 12/31/2026 Prime + 2 %
June 28, 2021 Note 100,000 6/28/2023 4 % 12/31/2026 Prime + 2 %
September 17, 2021 Note 500,000 9/17/2023 4 % 12/31/2026 Prime + 2 %
December 13, 2022 Note 500,000 12/13/2023 4 % 12/31/2026 Prime + 2 %
December 29, 2022 Note 2,000,000 8/1/2023 Prime + 4 % 12/31/2026 Prime + 2 %
March 3, 2023 Note 800,000 7/1/2023 Prime + 4 % 12/31/2026 Prime + 2 %
$ 4,000,000 (1)
(1) Note that $1,527,500 of this total was repaid to Mr. Sklar from proceeds under the Gibraltar Loan (see Loan and Security Agreement - Related Party below)
The restructuring is accounted for as a debt modification. On May 31, 2024, the Consolidated Secured Promissory Note was amended by that certain Amendment to Consolidated Secure Promissory Note, by and between STCB and Mr. Sklar, dated May 31, 2024 (the “2024 Consolidated Note Amendment” and together with the Consolidated Secured Promissory Note, the “Amended Consolidated Secured Promissory Note”). The 2024 Consolidated Note Amendment, among other things, extended the maturity date to August 31, 2026, provided that to the extent amounts remain due and payable on the maturity date, it will be extended until August 31, 2027.
On February 14, 2022, the Company issued an unsecured note to Sklar with a principal amount of $472,500, which was excluded from the note consolidation. The note carried an annual interest rate of 4% and was set to mature two years from its issuance. It was convertible into shares of Company common stock at a conversion price of $0.29 per share, based on the 10-day volume-weighted average trading price prior to issuance. On May 10, 2024, the Company and Sklar amended the note, extending its maturity date to December 31, 2024. The note was fully repaid in 2024 using proceeds from the Gibraltar Loan, and the Company no longer has any obligations under it.
As of December 31, 2024 and 2023, the outstanding principal owed to Mr. Sklar under the referenced notes amounted to $2,472,500 and $4,472,500, respectively. For 2023, this total includes the February 14, 2022 Note.
Loan and Security Agreement - Related Party
On May 24, 2024, the Company entered into the Loan and Security Agreement, which allowed the Company to reduce long-term debt and expand its access to working capital (see Note 6). In connection with the Loan and Security Agreement, the Lender required Mr. Sklar to enter into a subordination agreement pursuant to which Mr. Sklar’s rights under (i) the February 14, 2022 Note, as amended and (ii) the Consolidated Secured Promissory Note would be subordinated to the lender’s rights under the Loan and Security Agreement.
In exchange for the subordination of and the maturity extension reflected in the Amended Consolidated Secured Promissory Note, $2,000,000 of the revolving loan available cash under the Loan and Security Agreement was used to repay the February 14, 2022 Note in its entirety and to pay down the interest and a portion of principal balance on the Amended Consolidated Secured Promissory Note. As of December 31, 2024 and 2023, the outstanding principal due to Mr. Sklar under outstanding notes was $2,472,500 and $4,472,500, respectively. As of December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023, there was no accrued interest due on these notes.
For the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, the outstanding notes held by Mr. Sklar incurred interest expense of $328,207 and $393,715, respectively.
Operating Lease - Related Party
On May 1, 2024, the Company entered into a three-year lease agreement (the “Citrus Lease”) with a lessor who is a related party (see Note 9 for additional information) for the rental of the second and third floors of a premise containing approximately 3,000 square feet located at 706 N. Citrus Ave, Los Angeles, CA 90038. The lease was classified as an operating lease and has a monthly base rent of $10,000 per month, with a base rent increase of 5% each year. There is an option for the Company to renew for an additional three years with notice given within 90 days before the end of the term.
In accordance with ASC 842 - Leases, the Company recognized an ROU asset and corresponding lease liability for $587,914 on the consolidated balance sheet for long-term office leases, as well as lease expense of $90,692 for the year ended December 31, 2024. See Note 12 - Leases for further discussion, including the impact on the consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.
Other Related Party Transactions
During the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, the Company recognized revenue from related parties of $6,140,172 and $11,696,722, respectively. There were $2,250,379 and $2,742,508 of accounts receivable and accrued accounts receivable from TSG and Temperance as of December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023, respectively. All revenues earned in relation to these accounts receivable are from related parties. Ross Sklar serves as the Chairman of Temperance.
During the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, the Company recognized cost of goods from products purchased from related parties of $3,896,551 and $2,688,160, respectively. There were $1,658,188 and $168,870 of accounts payable owing to TSG and other related parties as of December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023, respectively.
During the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, the Company received contributed services from related parties at a value of approximately zero and $334,572 (approximately $270,567 of stock compensation for shares vesting to advisors), respectively. These costs are expensed and recorded as additional paid-in capital in the period the services are provided.
Voting Agreements
On September 12, 2022, in connection with the closing of the AOS Acquisition, STCB entered into a Voting Agreement (the “AOS Voting Agreement”) with certain stockholders. The AOS Voting Agreement generally requires that the stockholders subject to the AOS Voting Agreement vote or cause to be voted their shares of Class A common stock, and execute and deliver written consents and otherwise exercise all voting rights with respect to their shares of Class A common stock in the same manner as Mr. Sklar votes or gives his consent, provided that such manner does not adversely affect such stockholder in a manner different from the effect on other holders of Class A common stock. In addition, in connection with the AOS Voting Agreement, the stockholders delivered irrevocable proxies to Mr. Sklar. The AOS Voting Agreement terminates (a) automatically upon the listing of the Company’s Class A common stock on the Nasdaq Stock Market or New York Stock Exchange, (b) with the written consent of each of the parties signatories thereto, (c) automatically in the event that Mr. Sklar owns less than 30% of the issued and outstanding common stock of STCB and is no longer STCB’s chief executive officer, or (d) automatically in the event STCB voluntarily commences any bankruptcy or similar proceedings or has commenced against it any bankruptcy or similar proceedings that are not dismissed within 60 days of such commencement.
On November 7, 2022, STCB entered into a Voting Agreement with Sanford Lang (a former director of STCB), pursuant to which, among other things, Mr. Lang would vote his shares in the same manner as Mr. Sklar votes or gives his consent, provided that such manner does not adversely affect such stockholder in a manner different from the effect on other holders of Class A common stock. On that same date, STCB entered into a Voting Agreement with Martin Goldrod (a former director of STCB), pursuant to which, among other things, Mr. Goldrod would vote his shares in the same manner as Mr. Sklar votes or gives his consent, provided that such manner does not adversely affect such stockholder in a manner different from the effect on other holders of Class A common stock.
On December 29, 2022, in connection with the closing of the Skylar Acquisition, STCB entered into a Voting Agreement (the “Skylar Voting Agreement”) with certain former stockholders. The Skylar Voting Agreement generally requires that the stockholders subject to the Skylar Voting Agreement vote or cause to be voted their shares of Class A common stock, and execute and deliver written consents and otherwise exercise all voting rights with respect to their shares of Class A common stock in the same manner as Mr. Sklar votes or gives his consent, provided that such vote or action does not disproportionately or adversely affect the stockholder in a manner different from the effect on other holders of Class A common stock. In addition, in connection with the Skylar Voting Agreement, the stockholders delivered irrevocable proxies to Mr. Sklar. The Skylar Voting Agreement terminates (a) automatically upon the listing of the Class A common stock on the Nasdaq Stock Market or New York Stock Exchange, (b) with the written consent of each of the parties signatories thereto, (c) automatically in the event that both of the following conditions are met: (i) Mr. Sklar is no longer STCB’s chief executive officer and (ii) Sklar is no longer a member of the Board, or (d) automatically in the event STCB voluntarily commences any bankruptcy or similar proceedings or has commenced against it any bankruptcy or similar proceedings that are not dismissed within 60 days of such commencement.
On February 15, 2023 in connection with the closing of the Soylent Acquisition, STCB entered into a Voting Agreement (the “Original Soylent Voting Agreement”) with Mr. Sklar and certain other stockholders of STCB. Effective May 14, 2024, STCB, Mr. Sklar and certain other stockholders holding a majority of the shares then held by such stockholders entered into an amendment to the Soylent Voting Agreement (the “Soylent Voting Agreement Amendment” and together with the Original Soylent Voting Agreement, the “Soylent Voting Agreement”). The Soylent Voting Agreement Amendment generally provides that (i) until February 15, 2025, the stockholders and Mr. Sklar vote all shares such person has voting control over in favor of limited acquisitions, with the approval of the Stockholder Representative (defined in the Soylent Merger Agreement); (ii) requires that until the termination of the Soylent Voting Agreement the stockholders and Mr. Sklar shall vote all shares such person has voting control over in favor of the election of (a) a board of directors consisting of seven (7) members, inclusive of (1) Sklar, (2) two such other person as may be designated by Mr. Sklar from time to time, (3) three directors as designated by a majority of the former Soylent preferred stockholders party to the Soylent Voting Agreement (the “Stockholder Directors”), and (4) an independent director designated by mutual agreement of Sklar and a majority of the former Soylent preferred stockholders party to the Soylent Voting Agreement; and (iii) provides that the elected directors adopt a Compensation Committee, Audit Committee and Governance Committee and customary charters.
As of April 16, 2025, Mr. Sklar beneficially controls, directly or indirectly, the voting power of up to 484,608,472 shares of the Company’s Class A common stock representing up to 75.1 % of the outstanding voting power of the Class A common stock, with respect to the election of up to 4 of 7 directors to our Board. Mr. Sklar may exercise control over approximately 220,658,559 shares, or 34.2 % of the total voting power of STCB pursuant to certain stockholder actions as described in the respective voting agreements.
Director Independence
At this time, the Company does not have a policy that all of its directors, or a majority, be independent of management. The Company currently has four directors. It is the intention of the Company to implement a policy in the future that a majority of the Board members be independent of the Company’s management as the members of the Board increase following further implementation of the Company’s business plan.

---

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES
Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services
Audit Fees
Macias Gini & O’Connell LLP (“MGO”) has served as our independent registered public accountants for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023. The following is a summary of the fees billed or expected to be billed to us by MGO for professional services rendered with respect to the fiscal years ended December 31:
Audit fees (1) $ 550,000 $ 470,000
Audit-related fees (2) - -
Tax fees (3) - -
All other fees (4) - -
$ 550,000 $ 470,000
(1) Audit Fees consist of fees billed and expected to be billed for services rendered for the audit of our consolidated financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, and the review of our condensed consolidated financial statements included in our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q.
(2) Audit-related fees represent professional services rendered for assurance and related services by the accounting firm that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of our consolidated financial statements that are not reported under “Audit Fees.”
(3) Tax Fees consist of fees billed for professional services related to preparation of our U.S. federal and state income tax returns and tax advice.
(4) All Other Fees consist of fees billed for products and services provided by our independent registered public accountants, other than those disclosed above.
Pre-Approval Policies
Our Board approves the engagement of the auditor before the firm renders audit and non-audit services. Since the Company does not have an audit committee, we do not rely on pre-approval policies and procedures.
PART IV

---

ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit No.
Exhibit Description
2.1 (*)†
Agreement and Plan of Merger, by and among (i) Starco Brands, Inc., a Nevada corporation, (ii) Starco Merger Sub Inc., a Delaware corporation, (iii) The AOS Group Inc., a Delaware corporation, and (iv) Matthias Metternich, solely in his capacity as the Company Stockholder Representative of The AOS Group stockholders, dated September 12, 2022, filed as Exhibit 2.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on September 15, 2022.
2.2 (*)†
Agreement and Plan of Merger, by and among (i) Starco Brands, Inc., a Nevada corporation, (ii) Starco Merger Sub II, Inc., a Delaware corporation, (iii) Skylar Body, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, (iv) Skylar Body, Inc., a Delaware corporation, and (v) Shareholder Representative Services LLC, solely in its capacity as the representative of the Company Holders, dated December 29, 2022, filed as Exhibit 2.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on January 4, 2023.
2.3 (*)†
Agreement and Plan of Merger, by and among Starco Brands, Inc., Starco Merger Sub I Inc., Soylent Nutrition, Inc., and Hamilton Start, LLC, solely in its capacity as stockholders’ representative and solely for purposes of Article IX, Article X, Section 2.08 and Section 6.11 therein, dated February 14, 2023, filed as Exhibit 2.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on February 21, 2023.
3.1 (*)
Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of Starco Brands, Inc., filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 10-K filed with the Commission on April 18, 2023.
3.2 (*)
Amended and Restated Bylaws of Starco Brands, Inc., filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on July 1, 2022.
4.1 (*)†
Registration Rights Agreement, by and between Starco Brands, Inc., a Nevada corporation, and the Investors listed on Schedule A thereto, dated September 12, 2022, filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on September 15, 2022.
4.2 (*)†
Voting Agreement, by and among Starco Brands, Inc., a Nevada corporation, and the stockholders listed on Schedule A thereto, dated September 12, 2022, filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on September 15, 2022.
4.3 (*)†
Registration Rights Agreement, by and between Starco Brands, Inc., a Nevada corporation, and the Investors listed on Schedule A thereto, dated December 29, 2022, filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on January 4, 2023.
4.4 (*)
Voting Agreement, by and among Starco Brands, Inc., a Nevada corporation, and the stockholders listed on Schedule A thereto, dated December 29, 2022, filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on January 4, 2023.
4.5 (*)
Registration Rights Agreement, by and between Starco Brands, Inc., and Hamilton Start, LLC in its capacity as Stockholder Representative on behalf of the Investors (as defined therein) dated February 15, 2023, filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on February 21, 2023.
4.6 (*)
Amendment to Registration Rights Agreement, dated May 14, 2024, by and among Starco Brands, Inc., and YL Management, LLC in its capacity as Successor Stockholder Representative on behalf of the Investors (as defined in the Registration Rights Agreement, by and between Starco Brands, Inc. and Hamilton Start, LLC, dated February 15, 2023), filed as Exhibit 4.6 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on August 14, 2024.
4.7 (*)
Voting Agreement, by and among Starco Brands, Inc., Ross Sklar, and the stockholders of the Company listed on Schedule A thereto, dated February 15, 2023, filed as Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on February 21, 2023.
4.8 (*)
Amendment to Voting Agreement, dated May 14, 2024, by and among Starco Brands, Inc., Ross Sklar, and the stockholders of the Company listed on Schedule A to the Voting Agreement, by and between Starco Brands, Inc., Ross Sklar, and the stockholders of the Company listed on Schedule A thereto, dated February 15, 2023, filed as Exhibit 4.8 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on August 14, 2024.
4.9(*)
Stockholder Agreement by and among Starco Brands, Inc., a Nevada corporation, YL Management LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, and certain holders of Acquiror Common Stock (as defined therein) dated March 15, 2024, filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on March 21, 2024.
10.1 (*)
Form of Indemnification Agreement by and between Starco Brands, Inc. and each of its current directors, filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on February 21, 2023.
10.2 (*)(+)
Brand License Agreement, by and between Starco Brands, Inc. and The Starco Group, effective as of July 12, 2017, filed as Exhibit 6.2 to the Company’s Regulation A+ offering statement filed with the Commission on August 31, 2021.
10.3 (*)(+)
License Agreement by and between Sklar Holdings, Inc., and Starco Brands, Inc. executed April 1, 2018, filed as Exhibit 99.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on February 19, 2021.
10.4 (*)(+)
License Agreement by and between Winona Pure, Inc. and Starco Brands, Inc. executed April 1, 2018, filed as Exhibit 99.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on February 19, 2021
10.5 (*)(+)
Amended and Restated License Agreement, by and between Whipshots Holdings LLC, Washpoppin Inc., and “Cardi B,” effective as of November 27, 2023, filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on December 8, 2023
10.6 (*)(+)
Intellectual Property Purchase Agreement, by and between Whipshots LLC and PENGUINS FLY, LLC, dated as of August 24, 2021, filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on September 14, 2021.
10.7 (*)
Form of Distribution Agreement, by and between Starco Brands, Inc. and “Distributor”, filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on November 10, 2021.
10.8 (*)
Form of Broker Agreement, by and between Starco Brands, Inc. and “Broker”, filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on November 10, 2021.
10.9 (*)
Consolidated Secured Promissory Note of Starco Brands, Inc., issued in favor of Ross Sklar, dated August 11, 2023, filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on August 11, 2023.
10.10 (*)
Amendment to Consolidated Secured Promissory Note, by and between Starco Brands and Ross Sklar, dated May 31, 2024, filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on May 31, 2024.
10.11 (*)
Amended and Restated Consolidated Security Agreement, by and between Starco Brands, Inc. and Ross Sklar, dated August 11, 2023, filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on August 11, 2023.
10.12 (*)
Warrant to Purchase Common Stock, issued to Ross Sklar, dated December 29, 2022, filed as Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on January 5, 2023.
10.13 (*)
Warrant to Purchase Class A Common Stock, issued to Ross Sklar, dated March 3, 2023, filed as Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on March 9, 2023.
10.14 (*) (+)
License Agreement by and between Starco Brands, Inc. and Temperance Distilling Company, executed January 24, 2022, filed as Exhibit 10.25 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Commission on April 18, 2023.
10.15 (*) (+)
Loan and Security Agreement, dated as of May 24, 2024, by and among, Starco Brands, Inc., Whipshots Holdings, LLC, Whipshots, LLC, The AOS Group Inc., Skylar Body, LLC, Soylent Nutrition, Inc., Gibraltar Business Capital, LLC, and certain other persons from time to time that may become a party thereto, filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on May 31, 2024.
10.16 (*)
Starco Brands, Inc. - 2023 Equity Incentive Plan, filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on November 29, 2023.
14.1 (*)
Code of Business Conduct and Ethics of Starco Brands, Inc., filed as Exhibit 14.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on August 28, 2023.
21.1 (#)
Subsidiaries of the Company.
31.1 (#)
Certification of Chief Executive Officer required by Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a).
31.2 (#)
Certification of Chief Financial Officer required by Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a).
32.1 (#)(##)
Certification of Chief Executive Officer required by Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. 1350.
32.2 (#)(##)
Certification of Chief Financial Officer required by Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. 1350.
101.INS
Inline XBRL Instance Document (the Instance Document does not appear in the Interactive Data File because its XBRL tags are embedded within the Inline XBRL document).
101.SCH
Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.
101.CAL
Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.
101.DEF
Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.
101.LAB
Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.
101.PRE
Inline XBRL Taxonomy Presentation Linkbase Document.
Cover Page Interactive Data File (formatted as Inline XBRL and contained in Exhibit 101).
(#) Filed herewith.
(*) Incorporated by reference to the filing indicated.
(+) In accordance with Item 601(a)(5) of Regulation S-K, certain schedules (or similar attachments) to this exhibit may have been omitted from this filing. The Registrant will provide a copy of any omitted schedule to the SEC or its staff upon request.
In accordance with Item 601(b)(10)(iv) of Regulation S-K, certain provisions or terms of the Agreement may have been redacted. The Registrant will provide an unredacted copy of the exhibit on a supplemental basis to the SEC or its staff upon request.
† Certain of the exhibits and schedules to this exhibit have been omitted in accordance with Regulation S-K Item 601(b)(2). The Registrant agrees to furnish a copy of all omitted exhibits and schedules to the SEC upon its request.
(##) The certifications attached as Exhibits 32.1 and 32.2 that accompany this report, are not deemed filed with the SEC and are not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of Starco Brands, Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, whether made before or after the date of this report irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.