EDGAR 10-K Filing

Company CIK: 844965
Filing Year: 2022
Filename: 844965_10-K_2022_0000844965-22-000007.json

---

ITEM 1. BUSINESS
Item 1. Business.
The financial statements presented in this Annual Report are the consolidated financial statements of TETRA Technologies, Inc., a Delaware corporation and its subsidiaries. When the terms “TETRA,” “the Company,” “we,” “us,” or “our” are used in this document, those terms refer to TETRA Technologies, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries.
TETRA is a Delaware corporation incorporated in 1981. Our corporate headquarters are located at 24955 Interstate 45 North, The Woodlands, Texas, 77380. Our phone number is 281-367-1983 and our website is www.tetratec.com. Our common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange (the “NYSE”) under the symbol “TTI.”
Our Corporate Governance Guidelines, Code of Business Conduct, Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers, Audit Committee Charter, Human Capital Management and Compensation Committee Charter, and Nominating, Governance and Sustainability Committee Charter, as well as our Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, and Current Reports on Form 8-K, and all amendments to those reports are all available, free of charge, on our website at www.tetratec.com as soon as practicable after we file the reports with the SEC. Information contained on or connected to our website is not, and shall not be deemed to be, a part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K or incorporated into any other filings with the SEC. The documents referenced above are available in print at no cost to any stockholder who requests them from our Corporate Secretary.
About TETRA
TETRA Technologies, Inc., together with its consolidated subsidiaries, is a leading, industrial oil and gas products and services company operating on six continents, focused on bromine-based completion fluids, calcium chloride, water management solutions, frac flowback and production well testing services. We have two reportable segments - Completion Fluids & Products Division and Water & Flowback Services Division.
Our Completion Fluids & Products Division manufactures and markets clear brine fluids, additives, and associated products and services to the oil and gas industry for use in well drilling, completion, and workover operations in the United States and in certain countries in Latin America, Europe, Asia, the Middle East and Africa. The Division also markets liquid and dry calcium chloride products manufactured at its production facilities or purchased from third-party suppliers to a variety of markets outside the energy industry.
Our Water & Flowback Services Division provides onshore oil and gas operators with comprehensive water management services. The Division also provides frac flowback, production well testing, and other associated services in many of the major oil and gas producing regions in the United States and Mexico, as well as in oil and gas basins in certain countries in Latin America, Europe, and the Middle East.
We continue to pursue a long-term growth strategy that includes expanding our core businesses, domestically and internationally, through the introduction of new technology, organic growth and accretive acquisitions.
Products and Services
Completion Fluids & Products Division
Liquid calcium chloride, calcium bromide, zinc bromide, zinc calcium bromide, sodium bromide, and blends of such products manufactured by our Completion Fluids & Products Division are referred to as clear brine fluids (“CBFs”) in the oil and gas industry. CBFs are salt solutions that have variable densities and are used to control bottom-hole pressures during oil and gas completion and workover operations. The Division sells CBFs and various CBF additives to U.S. and foreign oil and gas exploration and production companies and to other companies that service customers in the oil and gas industry.
The Completion Fluids & Products Division provides both stock and custom-blended CBFs based on each customer’s specific needs and the proposed application. It provides a broad range of associated CBF services, including: on-site fluids filtration, handling and recycling; wellbore cleanup; custom fluids blending; and fluid
management services. The Division’s flagship CBF technology, TETRA CS Neptune® completion fluids, are high-density monovalent and divalent fluids that are free of undissolved solids, zinc, priority pollutants, and formate ions. They were developed by TETRA to be environmentally friendly alternatives to traditional zinc bromide high-density completion fluids and environmentally friendly and cost-effective alternatives to cesium formate high-density completion fluids, all of which are used in well completion and workover operations, as well as low-solids reservoir drilling fluids.
The Completion Fluids & Products Division offers to repurchase, or “buy-back”, certain used CBFs from customers, which can be reconditioned and recycled. Selling used CBFs back to us reduces the net cost of the CBFs to customers and minimizes our customers’ need to dispose of used fluids. We recondition used CBFs through filtration, blending and the use of proprietary chemical processes, and then market the reconditioned CBFs.
By blending different CBFs and using various additives, we are able to modify the specific density, crystallization temperature, and chemical composition of the CBFs as required to meet our customers’ specific needs. The Division’s fluid engineering personnel determine the optimal CBF blend for a customer’s particular application to maximize its effectiveness and lifespan. Our filtration services use a variety of techniques and equipment to remove particulates from CBFs at the customer’s site so the CBFs can be reused. Filtration also enables recovery of a greater percentage of used CBFs for reconditioning.
The Completion Fluids & Products Division manufactures liquid and dry calcium chloride and liquid calcium bromide, zinc bromide, zinc calcium bromide, and sodium bromide for distribution, primarily into energy markets. Liquid and dry calcium chloride are also sold into water treatment, industrial, cement, food processing, road maintenance, ice melt, agricultural, and consumer products markets. Sodium bromide is also sold into industrial water treatment markets, where it is used as a biocide in recirculated cooling tower waters and in other applications.
Our calcium chloride manufacturing facilities are located in the United States and Finland. In the United States, we manufacture liquid calcium chloride products at four manufacturing plant facilities. Liquid and flake calcium chloride are also produced at our Kokkola, Finland plant. We operate our European calcium chloride operations under the name TETRA Chemicals Europe. We also manufacture liquid calcium chloride at our facilities in Parkersburg, West Virginia and Lake Charles, Louisiana, and we have two solar evaporation facility locations located in San Bernardino County, California, that produce liquid calcium chloride and sodium chloride from underground brine reserves, which are replenished naturally. Our calcium chloride production facilities have a combined production capacity of approximately 1.0 million equivalent liquid tons per year. We also acquire calcium chloride inventory from other producers.
Our Completion Fluids & Products Division manufactures liquid calcium bromide, zinc bromide, zinc calcium bromide, and sodium bromide at our West Memphis, Arkansas facility. A proprietary process applied at this facility uses bromine and zinc to manufacture zinc bromide. This facility also uses proprietary processes to manufacture calcium bromide and sodium bromide and to recondition and upgrade used CBFs that we have repurchased from our customers.
We are also pursuing low-carbon energy initiatives that leverage our fluids and aqueous chemistry core competencies, our significant bromine and lithium assets (including our approximately 31,100 net acres of brine leases in Arkansas) and technologies, and our leading calcium chloride production capabilities. In May 2021, we signed a memorandum of understanding (“MOU”) with CarbonFree Chemicals Holdings, LLC (“CarbonFree”), a carbon capture company with patented technologies that capture CO2 and mineralize emissions to make commercial, carbon-negative chemicals. During the one-year MOU period, both Companies will work towards a definitive agreement that may include investments by TETRA into CarbonFree, a joint venture, or other commercial arrangements. In December 2021, we invested $5.0 million in a convertible note issued by CarbonFree. This was an investment alongside other investors that provided CarbonFree the necessary capital to construct the first SkyCycleTM facility. We have also reached agreement with CarbonFree on the potential use of a unique solution proposed by TETRA to produce low carbon calcium chloride to support SkyCycleTM technology.
In August 2021, we announced completion of a preliminary technical assessment by an independent geological consulting firm to assess lithium and bromine exploration targets in our Southwest Arkansas brine leases. Bromine has been identified as a key mineral resource in zinc-bromide energy storage systems and our TETRA PureFlow™ high purity zinc bromide has been qualified by several battery technology companies. The lithium
battery market is a rapidly growing market, affording us the opportunity to participate in a meaningful way. In December, 2021, we announced a strategic agreement with Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc. ("Eos") (NASDAQ: EOSE)
involving a long-term supply and collaboration agreement to supply our high purity zinc bromide solution, TETRA PureFlowTM. TETRA and Eos expect to collaborate for improved battery performance, cost and system life including an end-of-life solution using TETRA's extensive experience with reclaiming and recycling zinc bromide. In addition, as of February 25, 2022, we are in the process of drilling an exploratory brine well on our dedicated acreage in the Smackover Formation in Arkansas. The results of the well, which is expected to be completed in the first quarter of 2022, are expected to advance our exploratory target lithium and bromine assets to more refined resources targets. We will assess the next steps towards determining whether we can develop these key minerals to augment our current global infrastructure and chemistry expertise, allowing us to further expand beyond the oil and gas market.
Water & Flowback Services Division
Our Water & Flowback Services Division provides a wide variety of water management services that support hydraulic fracturing in unconventional well completions for domestic onshore oil and gas operators. These services include fresh and produced water analysis, treatment and recycling, blending and distribution, storage and pit lining, transfer, engineering, and environmental risk mitigation. The Water & Flowback Services Division’s patented and patent-pending equipment and processes include advanced hydrocyclones for sand management, certain produced- and fresh-water blending technologies, and the TETRA Steel™ 1200 rapid deployment water transfer system. The Water & Flowback Services Division seeks to design sustainable solutions that meet the unique needs of each customer in order to maximize operational performance and efficiency and minimize the use of fresh water. These solutions include tailored “Last Mile” infrastructure to transfer water around well pads in a safe, efficient and environmentally responsible manner - which consists of water storage ponds, movable storage tanks, a network of water transfer lines including poly pipe and TETRA Steel™ lay-flat hose, automated transfer and blending of produced water, and water treatment and recycling systems. These systems include the TETRA SwiftWater Automated Treatment (SWAT™) system that chemically treats produced water through a clarification process and the TETRA Oil Recovery After Production Technology (Orapt™) mobile oil separation system that recovers oil from produced water. Automation has also been deployed throughout 2020 and 2021 across the TETRA water management portfolio, and across TETRA flowback services in 2021, to reduce health, safety and environmental risks and enhance reliability and cost-effectiveness.
Our Water & Flowback Services Division also provides frac flowback services, early production facilities and services, production well testing services, and other associated services, including well flow management and evaluation services that enable operators to quantify oil and gas reserves, optimize oil and gas production and minimize oil and gas reservoir damage. In certain basins, water, sand, and other abrasive materials commonly accompany the initial production of natural gas or oil, often under high-pressure and high-temperature conditions and, in some cases, from reservoirs containing high levels of hydrogen sulfide gas. The Water & Flowback Services Division provides the specialized equipment and qualified personnel to address these impediments to production. Early production services typically include sophisticated evaluation techniques for reservoir management, including unconventional shale reservoir exploitation and optimization of well workover programs. Frac flowback and production well testing services may include well control, well cleanup and laboratory analysis. These services are used in the completion process after hydraulic fracturing and in the production phase of oil and gas wells.
This Division maintains one of the largest fleets of high-pressure production testing equipment in the United States, including equipment designed to work in environments where high levels of hydrogen sulfide gas are present. The Division has domestic operating locations in Colorado, Louisiana, New Mexico, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Texas, West Virginia, and Wyoming. The Division also has locations in certain countries in Latin America, Europe, and the Middle East.
Former Compression Division
Our former Compression Division provided compression services and equipment for natural gas and oil production, gathering, artificial lift, transmission, processing and storage. Our former Compression Division’s operations were conducted through our partially-owned CSI Compressco LP (“CSI Compressco”) subsidiary. Through one of our former wholly-owned subsidiaries, CSI Compressco GP LLC (f/k/a CSI Compressco GP Inc.) (the “general partner”), we managed and controlled CSI Compressco, and accordingly, we consolidated CSI Compressco’s results of operations in our consolidated results of operations through January 31, 2021. On January 29, 2021, we entered into the Purchase and Sale Agreement with Spartan Energy Partners, LP and Energy Holdco, LLC (together, “Spartan”) pursuant to which we sold the general partner of CSI Compressco, including the incentive distribution rights (“IDRs”) in CSI Compressco and approximately 23.1% of the outstanding limited partner interests in CSI Compressco, in exchange for a combination of $13.9 million in cash and $3.1 million in contingent consideration in the form of cash and/or CSI Compressco common units if CSI Compressco achieves certain financial targets on or before December 31, 2022. As of December 31, 2021, we retained an interest in CSI Compressco consisting of approximately 3.8% of the outstanding common units. Throughout this Annual Report, we refer to the transaction with Spartan as the “GP Sale.” We have reflected the operations of our former Compression Division as discontinued operations for all periods presented. See Note 3 - “Discontinued Operations” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further information.
Sources of Raw Materials
Our Completion Fluids & Products Division manufactures calcium chloride, calcium bromide, zinc bromide, zinc calcium bromide, and sodium bromide for sale to its customers. The Division also recycles used calcium bromide and zinc bromide CBFs repurchased from its oil and gas customers.
The Completion Fluids & Products Division manufactures liquid calcium chloride, either from underground brine or by reacting hydrochloric acid with limestone. We produce calcium chloride and sodium chloride at our two facilities in San Bernardino County, California, by solar evaporation of pumped underground brine reserves that contain calcium chloride. The underground reserves of this brine are deemed adequate to supply our foreseeable need for calcium chloride at those plants. The Division also purchases liquid and dry calcium chloride from a number of U.S. and foreign chemical manufacturers.
The Completion Fluids & Products Division’s primary sources of hydrochloric acid are co-product streams obtained from chemical manufacturers. Substantial quantities of limestone are also consumed when converting hydrochloric acid into calcium chloride. Currently, hydrochloric acid and limestone are generally available from multiple sources.
To produce calcium bromide, zinc bromide, zinc calcium bromide, and sodium bromide at our West Memphis, Arkansas facility, we use bromine, hydrobromic acid, zinc, ammonia water and lime as raw materials. There are multiple sources of zinc that we can use in the production of zinc bromide and zinc calcium bromide. We have a long-term supply agreement with Lanxess, AG (“Lanxess”) under which the Completion Fluids & Products Division purchases its requirements of raw material bromine from Lanxess’ Arkansas bromine production facilities.
The Completion Fluids & Products Division also owns a calcium bromide manufacturing plant near Magnolia, Arkansas, which was constructed in 1985. This plant was acquired in 1988 and is not operable. We currently lease over 31,100 net acres of brine leases in the vicinity of this plant, which contain bromine and lithium. See our disclosures titled “Bromine and Lithium Exploration Targets” set forth in Item 2 of this Annual Report. While this plant is designed to produce calcium bromide, it could be modified to produce elemental bromine or select bromine compounds. Development of the brine field, construction of necessary pipelines and reconfiguration of the plant would require a substantial capital investment. The long-term Lanxess bromine supply agreement discussed above provides a secure supply of bromine to support the Division’s current operations. We do, however, continue to evaluate our strategy related to the Magnolia, Arkansas, assets and their future development. Lanxess has certain rights to participate in future development of the Magnolia, Arkansas assets. In addition, we are party to agreements with Standard Lithium Ltd. (“Standard Lithium”) (NYSE: SLI), under which Standard Lithium has the right to explore, produce and extract lithium in our Arkansas leases as well as additional potential resources in the Mojave region (San Bernardino County) of California. See Note 2 - “Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies” and Note 14 - “Fair Value Measurements” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further information.
The Water & Flowback Services Division purchases water management and production testing equipment and components from third-party manufacturers.
Market Overview and Competition
Our operations are highly dependent upon the demand for, and production of, natural gas and oil in the various domestic and international locations in which we operate, and were significantly affected by the unprecedented impact of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020. Demand for products and services of our Completion Fluids & Products Division remained resilient despite pandemic impacts on commodity prices in 2020 and experienced significant recoveries during the second half of 2021. West Texas Intermediate oil prices improved from an average of $39.16 per barrel during 2020 to an average of $77.33 per barrel during the fourth quarter of 2021.
Completion Fluids & Products Division
Our Completion Fluids & Products Division provides its products and services to oil and gas exploration and production companies in the United States and certain foreign markets, and to other customers that service such companies. Current areas of market presence include the onshore U.S., the U.S. Gulf of Mexico, the North Sea, Mexico and certain countries in South America, Europe, Asia, the Middle East and Africa. Customers with deepwater operations frequently use high volumes of CBFs, which can be subject to harsh downhole conditions, such as high pressure and high temperatures. Demand for CBF products is generally driven by offshore completion and workover activity.
The Completion Fluids & Products Division’s principal competitors in the sale of CBFs to the oil and gas industry are other major international drilling fluids and energy services companies, to many of which we provide products and services. This market is highly competitive and competition is based primarily on service, availability, and price. Customers of the Completion Fluids & Products Division include significant oilfield service companies, major and independent U.S. and international oil and gas producers, and U.S. and international chemical providers. The Division also sells its CBF products through various distributors.
The Completion Fluids & Products Division’s liquid and dry calcium chloride products have a wide range of uses outside the energy industry. Non-energy market segments where these products are used include water treatment, industrial, food processing, road maintenance, ice melt, agricultural, and consumer products. We also sell sodium bromide into industrial water treatment markets as a biocide under the BioRid® tradename. Most of these markets are highly competitive. The Completion Fluids & Products Division’s European calcium chloride operations market our calcium chloride products to certain European markets. Our principal competitors in the non-energy related calcium chloride markets include Occidental Chemical Corporation and Vitro in North America and NedMag in Europe.
Water & Flowback Services Division
The Water & Flowback Services Division provides comprehensive water management and frac flowback services to a wide-range of onshore oil and gas operators located in all active North America unconventional oil and gas basins.
The Division also provides frac flowback services, early production facilities and services, production well testing services, sand filtration, and other associated services in various domestic and international locations, including well flow management and evaluation services that enable operators to quantify oil and gas reserves, optimize oil and gas production, and minimize oil and gas reservoir production damage.
The water management, flowback, and production testing markets are highly competitive, and competition is based on availability of appropriate equipment and qualified personnel, as well as price, quality of service, and safety record. The Division’s skilled personnel, operating procedures, integrated closed-loop water management solution, automation systems, and safety record give us a competitive advantage. Competition in the U.S. water management markets includes Select Energy and various regional companies, while competition in onshore U.S. production testing markets is primarily dominated by numerous small, privately owned operators. Halliburton and Schlumberger are competitors in the international production testing markets we serve although we provide these services to their customers on a subcontract basis from time to time. Customers for the Water & Flowback Services Division include major integrated and independent U.S. and international oil and gas producers that are active in the areas in which we operate.
No single customer provided 10% or more of our total consolidated revenues during the years ended December 31, 2021 or 2020. One customer provided more than 10% of our total consolidated revenues during the year ended December 31, 2019.
Other Business Matters
Human Capital Management
We collaborate as a team to execute for each other, our customers, and our shareholders. As of December 31, 2021, we had approximately 1,100 people worldwide. None of our U.S. employees are presently covered by a collective bargaining agreement. Our employees outside the U.S. are generally members of labor unions and associations in the countries in which they are employed. We believe that our relations with our employees are good.
Diversity and Inclusion
The diversity of our global workforce stimulates creativity and innovation as we use our collective talents to develop unique solutions to address the world's energy challenges. Our executive management sponsored Diversity & Inclusion Committee focuses on sharing information and promoting key initiatives across the company to educate and create awareness about the importance of a diverse and inclusive culture. The committee also assists the talent management group to attract, retain, develop, and reward a high-performing and diverse workforce, provide forums and sponsor training activities to share best practices concerning diversity and inclusion education, and develop communication platforms to share information about diversity and inclusion and promote the committee’s activities.
Career Development
The board of directors, the chief executive officer, and the vice president of Human Resources, evaluate, from time to time each year, executive development and succession planning to prepare us for future success. The succession planning process covers all senior management positions and certain other key positions. This review of executive talent determines readiness to take on additional leadership roles and identifies developmental opportunities needed to prepare our executives for greater responsibilities. Our short and long-term business strategy is considered when evaluating candidates and their skills.
Compensation and Benefits
The Company’s compensation programs are designed to incentivize performance, maximize returns, and build shareholder value. We work with consultants to benchmark our compensation and benefits programs to help us offer competitive compensation packages to attract and retain high-performing talent. We also offer competitive benefits to attract and retain exceptional talent.
Safety
Recognizing that safety, service quality, and environmental protection are conditions of employment, all employees and contractors are responsible for their safety, the safety of those around them, the quality of their work, and protection of the environment. As part of our safety-focused culture, it is customary that each meeting starts with an employee-led safety moment.
To ensure our work remains safe and of the highest quality, the Company has a comprehensive HSEQ Management System and program designed to improve the capacity of the organization by controlling worksite risks, developing proper work practices and procedures, and empowering employees with stop-work authority if they observe unsafe conditions, omissions, errors, or actions that could result in safety or environmental incidents, or product and service quality issues. If an incident takes place, we investigate all serious occurrences to root causes and implement corrective actions to ensure we expand our capacity to operate safely.
Driving is one of the highest exposure activities that we undertake in our day-to-day operations. We maintain a fleet of DOT and non-DOT vehicles and provide positive, real-time behavior feedback to our drivers via real-time monitors. Coupled with Journey Management, vehicle selection guidelines, and driver training, we have a comprehensive approach to reducing our driving exposure and incidents.
Proprietary Technology and Trademarks
As of December 31, 2021, we owned or licensed 42 issued U.S. patents and had 9 patent applications pending in the United States. We also had 19 owned or licensed patents and 39 patent applications pending in various other countries. The foreign patents and patent applications are primarily foreign counterparts to certain of our U.S. patents or patent applications. The issued patents expire at various times through 2037. We have elected to maintain certain other internally developed technologies, know-how, and inventions as trade secrets. While we believe that our patents and trade secrets are important to our competitive positions in our businesses, we do not believe any one patent or trade secret is essential to our success.
It is our practice to enter into confidentiality agreements with key employees, consultants and third parties to whom we disclose our confidential and proprietary information, and we have typical policies and procedures designed to maintain the confidentiality of such information. There can be no assurance, however, that these measures will prevent the unauthorized disclosure or use of our trade secrets and expertise, or that others may not independently develop similar trade secrets or expertise.
We sell various products and services under a variety of trademarks and service marks, some of which are registered in the United States or other countries.
Health, Safety, and Environmental Affairs Regulations
Our service and sales operations and manufacturing plants are subject to stringent and complex U.S. and foreign health, safety, and environmental laws and regulations. Although we are committed to conducting all of our operations under the highest standards of safety and respect for the environment, risks of substantial costs and liabilities pursuant to such laws and regulations are inherent in certain of our operations and in the development and handling of certain products and equipment produced or used at our plants, well locations, and worksites. Because of these risks, there can be no assurance that significant costs and liabilities will not be incurred now or in the future. Changes in environmental and health and safety laws and regulations could subject us to more rigorous standards and could affect demand for our customers’ products which in turn would impact demand for our products. We cannot predict the extent to which our operations may be affected by any changes to existing laws, regulations and enforcement policies, new interpretations of existing laws, regulations and policies, or any new laws, regulations, or policies promulgated in the future.
We are subject to numerous federal, state, local, and foreign laws and regulations relating to health, safety, and the environment, including regulations regarding air emissions, wastewater and storm water discharges, and the disposal of certain hazardous and nonhazardous wastes. Compliance with such laws and regulations may expose us to significant costs and liabilities, and cause us to incur significant capital expenditures in our operations. Failure to comply with these laws and regulations or associated permits may result in the assessment of administration, civil or criminal fines and penalties, the imposition of other corrective action obligations or other injunctive relief, or both.
Our operations in the United States are subject to various evolving environmental laws and regulations that are enforced by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”); the Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement (“BSEE”) of the U.S. Department of the Interior; the U.S. Coast Guard; and various other federal, state, and local environmental authorities. Similar laws and regulations, designed to protect the health and safety of our employees and visitors to our facilities, are enforced by the U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration, and other state and local agencies and authorities. Some of the primary environmental laws and regulations applicable to our operations include: (i) the Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1972 (the “Clean Water Act”); (ii) the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976; (iii) the Clean Air Act of 1977 (“CAA”); (iv) the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (“CERCLA”); (v) the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act of 1986; (vi) the Toxic Substances Control Act of 1976; (vii) the Hazardous Materials Transportation Act of 1975; (viii) the Pollution Prevention Act of 1990; and (ix) the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (“ESA”). Our operations outside the United States are subject to various foreign governmental laws and regulations relating to the environment, health and safety, and other regulated activities in the countries in which we operate, which may in some cases impose more stringent requirements than applicable laws in the United States.
Our operations routinely involve the handling of hydrocarbons and produced water. Hydrocarbons or hazardous and nonhazardous wastes may have been released during our operations, by third parties on wellhead sites where we provide services or store our equipment, or on or under other locations where wastes have been taken for disposal. Although most wastes associated with the exploration, development and production of oil and
natural gas are currently exempt from the more stringent hazardous waste regulations under RCRA and its state analogs, it is possible that some of the material we handle now or may handle in the future may be subject to regulation under RCRA as a hazardous waste. Additionally, we cannot assure you that such materials will not be subject to more stringent requirements or characterized as hazardous wastes in the future. Separately, properties where such hydrocarbons and/or wastes are released or disposed of may be subject to investigatory, remediation, and monitoring requirements under foreign, federal, state, and local environmental laws and regulations. CERCLA and comparable state laws and regulations impose strict, joint, and several liabilities without regard to fault or the legality of the original conduct on certain classes of persons that contributed to the release of a hazardous substance into the environment. These persons include the owner or operator of a disposal site where a hazardous substance release occurred and any person that transported, disposed of, or arranged for the transport or disposal of such hazardous substances released at a site. Under CERCLA, such persons may be liable for the costs of remediating the hazardous substances that have been released into the environment, for damages to natural resources and for the costs of certain health studies.
The CAA and its implementing regulations, and comparable state laws and regulations, regulate the emissions of air pollutants from various industrial sources and impose monitoring and reporting requirements. These laws and regulations impose limits on the levels of various substances that may be emitted into the atmosphere. For example, in June 2016, the EPA adopted regulations under its New Source Performance Standards and National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants that establish air emission controls for natural gas and natural gas liquids production, processing and transportation activities. These rules establish specific requirements associated with volatile organic compounds and methane emissions from certain hydraulically fractured natural gas wells, production-related wet seal and reciprocating compressors, and pneumatic controllers and storage vessels, and further require that most hydraulically fractured natural gas wells use so-called “green” completions. While the EPA under the Trump Administration finalized rules to rescind or modify certain of these requirements in September 2020, subsequently, the United States Congress approved, and President Biden signed into law, a resolution under the Congressional Review Act to repeal the September 2020 revisions, effectively reinstating the prior standards. Additionally, in November 2021, EPA issued a proposed rule that, if finalized, would establish OOOO(b) new source and OOOO(c) first-time existing source standards of performance for methane and volatile organic compound emissions for oil and gas facilities. Operators of affected facilities will have to comply with specific standards of performance to include leak detection using optical gas imaging and subsequent repair requirement, and reduction of emissions by 95% through capture and control systems. EPA plans to issue a supplemental proposal in 2022 containing additional requirements not included in the November 2021 proposed rule and anticipates the issuance of a final rule by the end of the year. We cannot predict the scope of any final methane regulatory requirements or the cost to comply with such requirements. However, additional or more stringent regulations could impose new air permitting or pollution control requirements on our equipment that could require us to incur material costs.
In accordance with Section 402 of the Clean Water Act, the EPA is authorized to issue National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (“NPDES”) General Permits to regulate offshore discharges in the Gulf of Mexico which includes Treatment, Completion and Workover (“TCW”) fluids. Our operations include providing services and materials to oil and gas operators for the use of TCW fluids in the Gulf of Mexico. The EPA’s current NPDES permit for oil and gas operations in the federal waters of the Gulf of Mexico expires on September 30, 2022. While the terms of any subsequent NPDES General Permit applicable to our customers’ operations are uncertain at this time, any additional restrictions on oil and gas operation in the Gulf of Mexico under the Clean Water Act, could have an indirect effect on us. In addition, the Clean Water Act, and comparable state laws and regulations thereunder, also prohibit the discharge of pollutants into regulated waters without a permit, including industrial wastewater discharges and storm water runoff, and establish limits on the levels of pollutants contained in such discharges.
The modification or reinterpretation of existing environmental laws or regulations, the more vigorous enforcement of existing environmental laws or regulations, or the adoption of new environmental laws or regulations could adversely affect oil and natural gas exploration and production operations, which in turn could have an adverse effect on us. For example, the federal government regularly evaluates new species for listing under the ESA. The ESA provides broad protection for species of fish, wildlife and plants that are listed as threatened or endangered, as well as certain “critical habitat” for such species. Similar protections are offered to migratory birds under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act. The listing of any new species, the relisting of a species from threatened to endangered, or the designation of critical habitat for any such species may cause us or our customers to incur additional costs or become subject to operating restrictions or bans at certain times or in certain areas. Separately, regulators at both the federal and state levels have spent increasing attention on matters related to oil and gas operations, particularly hydraulic fracturing and the emission of greenhouse gases (“GHGs”). For more information, see our risk factors titled “Our operations, and those of our suppliers and customers, are subject to a series of risks arising from climate change” and “Regulatory initiatives related to hydraulic fracturing in the countries where we and
our customers operate could result in operating restrictions or delays in the completion of oil and gas wells that may reduce demand for our services.”
We maintain various types of insurance intended to reimburse us for certain costs in the event of an accident, including an explosion or similar event, involving our onshore and offshore operations. Our insurance program is reviewed not less than annually with our insurance brokers and underwriters. Such insurance policies may not cover, or may only partially cover, certain losses or claims, which could result in a material adverse effect on our business and operations.

---

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
Item 1A. Risk Factors.
Certain Business Risks
Although it is not possible to identify all of the risks we encounter, we have identified the following significant risk factors that could affect our actual results and cause actual results to differ materially from any such results that might be projected, forecasted, or estimated by us in this Annual Report.
Market Risks
The demand and prices for our products and services are affected by several factors, including the supply, demand, and prices for oil and natural gas.
Demand for our services and products is particularly sensitive to the level of exploration, development, and production activity of, and the corresponding capital spending by, oil and natural gas companies. The level of exploration, development, and production activity is directly affected by oil and natural gas prices, which historically have been volatile and are likely to continue to be volatile. Prices for oil and natural gas are subject to large fluctuations in response to relatively minor changes in the supply of and demand for oil and natural gas, market uncertainty, and a variety of other economic factors that are beyond our control.
Oil prices fell beginning in early 2020 and recovered during 2021 and into early 2022. West Texas Intermediate oil prices averaged $39.16 per barrel during 2020 and improved to an average of $77.33 per barrel during the fourth quarter of 2021. The West Texas Intermediate price averaged $68.14 per barrel during 2021. Over this same period, U.S. natural gas prices have also been volatile, with the Henry Hub price ranging from a high of $23.86 per million British thermal units (“MMBtu”) in February 2021 to a low of $1.33 per MMBtu in September 2020 and averaged $2.03 and $3.89 per MMBtu during 2020 and 2021, respectively. As of February 25, 2022, the price of West Texas Intermediate oil was $91.90 per barrel and the Henry Hub price for natural gas was $4.48 per MMBtu. The prolonged volatility and low levels of oil and natural gas prices and supply and demand imbalances depressed levels of exploration, development, and production activity during 2020 and early 2021. If the drop in oil and natural gas prices experienced in 2020 and early 2021 returns or further declines and the supply and demand imbalances persist, there would be a material adverse effect on our business, consolidated results of operations, and consolidated financial condition. Should current market conditions worsen for an extended period of time, we may be required to record additional asset impairments. Such potential impairment charges could have a material adverse impact on our operating results.
Factors affecting the prices of oil and natural gas include: the level of supply and demand for oil and natural gas, worldwide; governmental regulations, including the policies of governments regarding the exploration for and production and development of their oil and natural gas reserves; weather conditions, natural disasters, and health or similar issues, such as pandemics or epidemics; worldwide political, military, and economic conditions; the ability or willingness of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (“OPEC”) and non-OPEC countries, such as Russia, to set and maintain oil production levels; the levels of oil production in the U.S. and by other non-OPEC countries; oil refining capacity and shifts in end-customer preferences toward fuel efficiency and the use of natural gas; the cost of producing and delivering oil and natural gas; and acceleration of the development of, and demand for, alternative energy sources.
The COVID-19 pandemic has had, and may in the future have, certain negative impacts on our business, and such impacts have had, and may in the future have, an adverse effect on our business, our financial condition, results of operations, or liquidity.
The COVID-19 pandemic and the resulting economic impact have had a significant negative impact on the oil and gas industry. In addition to the deterioration in demand for oil in 2020 which had an adverse impact on the demand for our products and services, the public health crisis caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, and the measures that have been taken or that may be taken in the future by governments, various regulatory agencies, our customers and our suppliers, have had, and may in the future have, certain negative impacts on our financial condition, results of operations, and liquidity, including, without limitation, the following:
•actions undertaken by national, state and local governments and health officials to contain COVID-19 or treat its effects. In response to various governmental directives, at points we have required most office-based employees, including most employees based at our headquarters in The Woodlands, Texas, to work remotely. We may experience reductions in productivity and disruptions to our business routines to the extent work-from-home arrangements remain in place;
•We could encounter logistical complications and increased costs adapting our disclosure controls and procedures and our internal control over financial reporting in a changing environment that includes work-from-home arrangements and furloughs. In the future we may encounter operational challenges or disruptions stemming from the pandemic that require us to implement new or enhanced internal controls to mitigate the risks of operating in a remote environment or increased risks of material misstatements resulting from changes to the business and other uncertainties;
•restrictions on importing and exporting products;
•higher logistics costs and global shipping delays;
•impacts related to late customer payments and contractual defaults associated with customer and supplier bankruptcies;
•potentially higher borrowing costs in the future;
•cybersecurity issues, as our network may become more vulnerable to cyberattacks due to increased remote access associated with work-from-home arrangements;
•our ability to use our net operating loss carryforwards may be limited;
•increased costs associated with possible facility closures to meet expected customer activity levels; and
•we may be required to record significant impairment charges with respect to assets, whose fair values may be negatively affected by the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on our operations. Also, we may be required to write off obsolete inventory, and such charges may be significant.
Any of the negative impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic, including those described above, alone or in combination with others, may have a significant adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations, or liquidity. The full extent to which the COVID-19 pandemic will negatively affect our financial condition, results of operations, or liquidity will depend on future developments that are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted, including the scope and duration of the pandemic, the COVID-19 infection rate, the outbreak of new COVID-19 variants, the efficacy of distribution of COVID-19 vaccines, the actions taken by authorities to contain it or treat its impact and the resulting impact on the oil and gas industry. Given the dynamic nature of these events, we cannot reasonably estimate the period of time that the COVID-19 pandemic and related market conditions will persist, the full extent of the impact they will have on our financial condition, results of operations, or liquidity or the pace or extent of any subsequent recovery.
We encounter, and expect to continue to encounter, intense competition in the sale of our products and services.
We compete with numerous companies in each of our operating segments, many of which have substantially greater financial and other resources than we have. Certain of our competitors have lower standards of quality, and offer equipment and services at lower prices than we do. Other competitors have newer equipment that is better suited to our customers’ needs. Particularly during a period of low oil and natural gas pricing, to the extent competitors offer products or services at lower prices or higher quality, or more cost-effective products or services, our business could be materially and adversely affected. In addition, certain of our customers may elect to perform services internally in lieu of using our services, which could also materially and adversely affect our operations.
The profitability of our operations is dependent on other numerous factors beyond our control.
Our operating results in general, and gross profit in particular, are determined by market conditions and the products and services we sell in any period. Other factors, such as heightened competition, changes in sales and distribution channels, availability of skilled labor and contract services, shortages in raw materials, or inability to obtain supplies at reasonable prices, may also affect the cost of sales and the fluctuation of gross margin in future periods.
Other factors affecting our operating results and activity levels include oil and natural gas industry spending levels for exploration, completion, production, development, and acquisition activities, and impairments of long-lived assets. Customer consolidation may also lead to reductions in capital spending that could have a material adverse effect on our business. Low oil prices and the supply and demand imbalance are expected to adversely affect such levels of spending in the oil and natural gas industry. In addition, Completion Fluids & Products Division profitability in future periods will continue to be affected by the mix of its products and services, including the timing of TETRA CS Neptune completion fluid projects, which are also dependent upon the success of customer offshore exploration and drilling efforts. If our customers reduce capital expenditures, such reductions may have a negative effect on the demand for many of our products and services and on our revenues and results of operations. A large concentration of our operating activities is located in the Permian Basin region of Texas and New Mexico. Our revenues and profitability are particularly dependent upon oil and natural gas industry activity and spending levels in this region. Our operations may also be affected by technological advances, cost of capital, and tax policies. Adverse changes in any of these other factors may have a material adverse effect on our revenues and profitability.
We hold minority investments in both publicly-traded and privately-held companies. Over time, the fair value of these investments may fluctuate significantly causing volatility in our financial results.
As of December 31, 2021, we hold approximately 3.8% of the outstanding CSI Compressco common units, which had a fair value of $6.2 million. The value of our investment in CSI Compressco may be adversely affected by negative changes in its results of operations, cash flows and financial position, which may occur as a result of the many risks attendant with operating in the compression services industry. We are party to agreements in which Standard Lithium has the right to explore, produce and extract Lithium in our Arkansas leases as well as additional potential resources in the Mojave region of California. The company receives cash and stock of Standard Lithium under the terms of the arrangements. If we elect to hold Standard Lithium stock received under these agreements, our operating results could be significantly affected by fluctuations in the market value of our stock holding. As of December 2021, we also hold a $5.0 million investment in a convertible note issued by CarbonFree. This note will be subject to fair value measurement adjustments which will affect our financial results and there can be no assurance that it will ultimately be repaid or converted into equity of CarbonFree.
Changes in the economic environment have resulted, and could further result, in significant impairments of certain of our long-lived assets.
Under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”), we review the carrying value of our long-lived assets when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of these assets may not be recoverable, based on their expected future cash flows. The impact of reduced expected future cash flow could require the write-down of all or a portion of the carrying value for these assets, which would result in additional impairments, resulting in decreased earnings. During the three-year period ending December 31, 2021, we recorded a total of $93.2 million of impairments and other charges for long-lived assets other than goodwill. Most significantly, during the fourth quarter of 2019, we recorded an impairment of $91.6 million in our Completion Fluids & Products Division related to our El Dorado, Arkansas calcium chloride production plant facility assets as a result of a reduction in the cost of raw materials for certain of our other chemical production plants and reduced demand for calcium chloride from the El Dorado plant due to general market conditions in the oil and gas industry. Depressed commodity prices and/or adverse changes in the economic environment could result in a greater decrease in the demand for many of our products and services, which could impact the expected utilization rates of certain of our long-lived assets, including plant facilities, operating locations, and operating equipment.
As part of our internal annual business outlook for each of our reporting units that we performed during the fourth quarter of 2019, we considered changes in the global economic environment that negatively impacted our stock price and market capitalization. As part of the first step of goodwill impairment testing for our Water Management reporting unit (part of our Water & Flowback Services Division) as of December 31, 2019, the only reporting unit with goodwill, we determined that the fair value of the Water Management reporting unit was less than
its carrying value, and the remaining balance of $25.9 million of goodwill was impaired. Additional internal annual business outlook analyses for each of our reporting units that we performed during the fourth quarters of 2020 and 2021 did not indicate additional impairments.
We are dependent on third-party suppliers for specific products and equipment necessary to provide certain of our products and services.
We sell a variety of CBFs to the oil and gas industry and non-energy markets, including calcium chloride, calcium bromide, zinc bromide, zinc calcium bromide, sodium bromide, formate-based brines, and our TETRA CS Neptune fluids, some of which we manufacture and some of which are purchased from third parties. Sales of these products contribute significantly to our revenues. In our manufacture of calcium chloride, we use brines, hydrochloric acid, and other raw materials purchased from third parties. In our manufacture of brominated CBF products, we use elemental bromine, hydrobromic acid, and other raw materials that are purchased from third parties. There are several raw materials for which there are only a limited number of suppliers or a single supplier. For example, we are currently required to purchase all of our requirements of elemental bromine, up to a certain specified maximum, from Lanxess under a long-term supply agreement. To mitigate potential supply constraints, we enter into supply agreements with particular suppliers, including Lanxess. We also evaluate alternative sources of supply to avoid reliance on limited or sole-source suppliers when possible. Although we have long-term supply agreements with Lanxess, there is no assurance that we will have an adequate supply of elemental bromine or the other raw materials required for all of our CBFs opportunities, or that such raw materials will be available at reasonable prices. Economic sanctions and other regulations imposed by the United States and other international countries as a result of the conflict involving Russia and Ukraine may disrupt supplies or affect the prices of certain raw materials. Should the conflict in Ukraine or other international locations further escalate, it is difficult to anticipate the extent to which current or future sanctions could increase our costs, disrupt our supplies, reduce our sales or otherwise affect our operations. If we are unable to acquire these raw materials at reasonable prices, or at all, for a prolonged period, our Completion Fluids & Products Division business could be materially and adversely affected.
Operating and Technological Risks
We have technological and age-obsolescence risk, both with our products and services as well as with our equipment assets.
New drilling, completion, and production technologies and equipment are constantly evolving. If we are unable to adapt to new advances in technology or replace older assets with new assets, we are at risk of losing customers and market share. Certain equipment, such as a portion of our production testing equipment fleet, may be inadequate to meet the needs of our customers in certain markets. The permanent replacement or upgrade of any of our equipment will require significant capital. Due to the unique nature of many of these assets, finding a suitable or acceptable replacement may be difficult and/or cost prohibitive. The replacement or enhancement of these assets over the next several years may be necessary in order for us to effectively compete in the current marketplace.
Our operations involve significant operating risks and insurance coverage may not be available or cost-effective.
We are subject to operating hazards normally associated with the oilfield service industry, including automobile accidents, fires, explosions, blowouts, formation collapse, mechanical problems, abnormally pressured formations, and environmental accidents. Environmental accidents could include, but are not limited to, oil and produced water spills, gas leaks or ruptures, uncontrollable flows of oil, gas, or well fluids, or discharges of CBFs or toxic gases or other pollutants. These operating hazards may also include injuries to employees and third parties during the performance of our operations.
We have maintained a policy of insuring our risks of operational hazards that we believe is customary in the industry. We believe that the limits of insurance coverage we have purchased are consistent with the exposures we face and the nature of our products and services. Due to economic conditions in the insurance industry, from time to time, we have increased our self-insured retentions for certain policies in order to minimize the increased costs of coverage, or we have reduced our limits of insurance coverage for, or not procured, certain coverage. In certain areas of our business, we, from time to time, have elected to assume the risk of loss for specific assets. To the extent we suffer losses or claims that are not covered, or are only partially covered by insurance, our results of operations could be adversely affected.
We are subject to a number of risks associated with the GP Sale, and these risks could adversely impact our operations, financial condition and business.
On January 29, 2021, we closed the sale of CSI Compressco’s general partner and approximately 23.1% of the outstanding limited partner interests in CSI Compressco to Spartan. We are subject to a number of risks associated with this transaction, including risks associated with:
•any required payments of indemnification obligations under the Purchase Agreement for retained liabilities and breaches of representations, warranties or covenants; and
•our failure to realize the full purchase price anticipated under the Purchase Agreement, including the ability of CSI Compressco to generate adjusted EBITDA on or prior to December 31, 2022 sufficient to result in payment of the contingent consideration.
As a result of these risks, we may be unable to realize the anticipated benefits of the transaction, including the total amount of consideration we expect to realize. Our failure to realize the anticipated benefits of the transaction would adversely impact our operations, financial condition and business and could limit our ability to pursue additional strategic transactions.
We may not be able to economically extract lithium or bromine from the leased acreage in our Arkansas brine leases.
Our Arkansas brine leases currently only contain exploration targets of lithium and bromine, and we may never discover proven mineral reserves on these properties. While we continue to evaluate the next steps regarding the potential development of our brine leases, we have only very recently started to conduct exploration work on the leases, and we are not currently able to determine the economic viability of the extraction of the lithium and bromine from the leased acreage. In addition, the extraction of lithium and bromine from these brine leases will likely require a significant amount of time and capital, which we are not able to estimate at this time and which may not be available to us on acceptable terms or at all. There can be no assurance that any future exploration efforts on these properties will be successful. As a result of these uncertainties, no assurance can be given that any future exploration programs will result in the discovery of commercial mineral resources or reserves.
Failure to effectively and timely execute our any of our low carbon energy initiatives could have an adverse effect on business and financial condition.
Our future success may depend on our ability to effectively execute on our low carbon energy initiatives. This strategy depends on our ability to effectively develop new technologies, expand application of our global infrastructure and chemistry expertise and on the economic viability of the extraction of lithium and bromine from the leased acreage. The exploration, development and extraction of brine and lithium from our Arkansas brine leases will likely require significant time and capital, and there is no guarantee of a return from these operations. Our low carbon energy initiatives may also depend in part on successful development of partnerships with other companies, such as our partnership and investment in CarbonFree, and such partners’ execution of their own respective projects and business strategies. If we, or the projects or partners we invest in, fail to execute our low carbon energy initiatives as planned, or if execution of such initiatives requires more time and capital than expected, demand for our technologies, services and mineral assets and consequently, our business, results of operations and financial condition could be adversely affected.
Weather-Related Risks
Certain of our operations are seasonal and depend, in part, on weather conditions.
In certain markets, the Water & Flowback Services Division’s onshore water management services can be dependent on adequate water supplies being available to its customers. To the extent severe drought or other weather-related conditions prevent our customers from obtaining needed water, frac water operations may not be possible and our Water & Flowback Services Division business may be negatively affected.
Severe weather, including named windstorms, and severe winter weather, can cause damage and disruption to our businesses.
A portion of our operations is susceptible to adverse weather conditions in the Gulf of Mexico, including hurricanes and other extreme weather conditions. Our 2021 results reflect an estimated unfavorable impact of $3.1 million due to the severe weather conditions during February that shut down fracking activity in several of our key markets and negatively impacted the supply chain for our industrial chemicals operations. Even if we do not experience direct damage from storms, we may experience disruptions in our operations, because we are unable to operate or our customers or suppliers may curtail their activities due to damage to their wells, platforms, pipelines, and facilities. From time to time, our onshore operations are also negatively affected by adverse weather conditions, including sustained rain and flooding. Severe weather during the winter may also have a significant impact on natural gas storage levels and reduce drilling activity and other customer activity substantially.
Financial Risks
The market price of our common stock has been and may continue to be volatile.
The market price of our common stock has fluctuated in the past and is subject to significant fluctuations in response to many factors, some of which are beyond our control, including the following:
•our operational performance;
•supply, demand, and prices of oil and natural gas;
•the activity levels of our customers;
•deviations in our earnings from publicly disclosed forward-looking guidance or analysts’ projections;
•recommendations by research analysts that cover us and other companies in our industry;
•risks related to acquisitions, divestitures and our growth strategy;
•uncertainty about current global economic conditions; and
•other general economic conditions.
During 2021, the closing price for our common stock ranged from a high of $4.49 per share to a low of $0.86 per share. In recent years, the stock market in general has experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations that have affected the market price for companies in industries similar to ours. Some of these fluctuations have been unrelated to operating performance and are attributable, in part, to outside factors such as the COVID-19 pandemic and its impact on the world economy. The volatility of our common stock may make it difficult to resell shares of our common stock at attractive prices.
Our long-term debt agreements contain covenants and other provisions that restrict our ability to take certain actions and may limit our ability to operate or grow our business in the future.
As of December 31, 2021, our total long-term debt outstanding of $151.9 million consisted of the carrying amount outstanding under our credit agreement (the “Term Credit Agreement”) and our Asset-Based Credit Agreement (the “ABL Credit Agreement”), both of which we entered into in September 2018. Following the closing of the GP Sale on January 29, 2021, we were required to use all net cash proceeds from the sale to repay borrowings under our Term Credit Agreement.
The ABL Credit Agreement and Term Credit Agreement each contain certain affirmative and negative covenants, including covenants that restrict the ability of TETRA and certain of its subsidiaries to take certain actions including, among other things and subject to certain significant exceptions, (i) incurring debt, (ii) granting liens, (iii) engaging in mergers and other fundamental changes, (iv) making investments, (v) entering into, or amending, transactions with affiliates, (vi) paying dividends and making other restricted payments, (vii) prepaying other indebtedness, and (viii) selling assets. The ABL Credit Agreement also contains a provision that may require a fixed charge coverage ratio (as defined in the ABL Credit Agreement) of not less than 1.00 to 1.00 in the event that certain conditions associated with outstanding borrowings and cash availability occur. The Term Credit Agreement also contains a requirement that the borrowers comply at the end of each fiscal quarter with a minimum Interest Coverage Ratio (as defined in the Term Credit Agreement) of 1.00 to 1.00. Our Term Credit Agreement requires us to annually prepay up to 50% of Excess Cash Flow (as defined in the Term Credit Agreement) from the most recent full fiscal year. If our Leverage Ratio (as defined in the Term Credit Agreement) at year-end is less than 2.00 to
1.00 , the prepayment requirement is decreased to 25%. If our Leverage Ratio at year-end is less than 1.50 to 1.00, then no prepayment is required.
Our continuing ability to comply with covenants in our Long-Term Debt Agreements depends largely upon our ability to generate adequate earnings and operating cash flow.
We have continuing exposure to abandonment and decommissioning obligations associated with oil and gas properties previously owned by Maritech.
From 2001 to 2012, our former subsidiary, Maritech Resources, Inc. (“Maritech”), sold various oil and gas producing properties in numerous transactions to different buyers. In connection with those sales, the buyers generally assumed the decommissioning liabilities associated with the properties sold (the “Legacy Liabilities”) and generally became the successor operator. In some cases, Maritech retained certain liabilities and we provided guaranties of Maritech’s retained liabilities. Some buyers of these Maritech properties subsequently sold certain of these properties to other buyers, who also assumed the financial responsibilities associated with the properties’ operations, including decommissioning liabilities, and these buyers also typically became the successor operator of the properties. To the extent that a buyer of these properties fails to perform the decommissioning work required, a previous owner, including Maritech, may be required to perform operations to satisfy the decommissioning liabilities. As a result of the third-party indemnity agreements and corporate guaranties we have previously provided, we may be responsible for satisfying these obligations if they are not satisfied by the current owners and operators of the properties or by Maritech. Significant decommissioning liabilities that were assumed by the buyers of the Maritech properties in these previous sales remain unperformed. If these buyers, or any successor owners of the Maritech properties, are unable to satisfy and extinguish their decommissioning liabilities due to bankruptcy or other liquidity issues, the U.S. Department of the Interior may seek to impose those obligations on Maritech and on us. The amount of cash necessary to satisfy these obligations could be significant and could adversely affect our business, results of operations, financial condition, and cash flows.
In March 2018, pursuant to a series of transactions, Maritech sold the remaining offshore leases held by Maritech to Orinoco Natural Resources, LLC (“Orinoco”) and, immediately thereafter, we sold all equity interest in Maritech to Orinoco. The assignments for all of the offshore leases conveyed to Orinoco have now been approved by the U.S. Department of the Interior and Orinoco (or its successors in interest) own these leases. Maritech also remains a recognized owner of one additional lease and remains an operator of a portion of four other offshore leases, two of which have either been relinquished or expired. Maritech was also a lessee on six leases when they expired and which have unsatisfied decommissioning liabilities. Under the Maritech Asset Purchase Agreement, Orinoco assumed all of Maritech’s decommissioning liabilities related to the leases conveyed to Orinoco (the “Orinoco Lease Liabilities”) and, under the Maritech Membership Interest Purchase Agreement, Orinoco assumed all other liabilities of Maritech, including the Legacy Liabilities, subject to limited exceptions unrelated to the decommissioning liabilities. Our guarantees may still cover these liabilities. Pursuant to a Bonding Agreement executed in connection with such purchase agreements, Orinoco provided non-revocable bonds in the aggregate amount of approximately $46.8 million to secure the performance of certain of Maritech’s decommissioning obligations related to the Orinoco Lease Liabilities and certain of Maritech’s remaining current decommissioning obligations (not including the Legacy Liabilities, the “Initial Bonds”). Orinoco was required to replace the Initial Bonds delivered at closing with other non-revocable performance bonds but has not done so. See Note 11 - “Commitments and Contingencies” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion of status of bond replacement.
If in the future we become liable for decommissioning liabilities associated with any property covered by either an Initial Bond or Replacement Bonds, the Bonding Agreement provides that if we call any of the Initial Bonds or the Interim Replacement Bonds to satisfy such liability and the amount of the bond payment is not sufficient to pay for such liability, Orinoco will pay us for the additional amount required. To the extent Orinoco is unable to cover any such deficiency or we become liable for a significant portion of the Legacy Liabilities, our financial condition and results of operations may be negatively affected.
Possible changes in the U.S. Department of Interior’s supplemental bonding and financial assurance requirements may increase our risks associated with the decommissioning obligations pertaining to oil and gas properties previously owned by Maritech.
Recent and additional anticipated changes to the supplemental bonding and financial assurance program managed by the U.S. Department of the Interior could require all oil and gas owners and operators with infrastructure in the Gulf of Mexico to provide additional supplemental bonds or other acceptable financial
assurance for decommissioning liabilities. These changes have the potential to adversely impact the financial condition of lease owners and operators in the Gulf of Mexico and increase the number of such owners and operators seeking bankruptcy protection, given current oil and gas prices. In July 2016, the U.S. Department of the Interior issued a Notice to Lessees and Operators (“2016 NTL”) that strengthened requirements for the posting of additional financial assurance by offshore lease owners and operators to assure that sufficient security is available to satisfy and extinguish decommissioning obligations with respect to offshore wells, platforms, pipelines and other facilities. The 2016 NTL, which became effective in September 2016, eliminated the past practice of waiving supplemental bonding requirements where lease owners or operators, or their guarantors, could demonstrate a certain level of financial strength. Instead, under the 2016 NTL, the U.S. Department of the Interior indicated that it would allow lease owners and operators to “self-insure,” but only up to 10% of their “tangible net worth,” which is defined as the difference between a company’s total assets and the value of all liabilities and intangible assets. It is unclear how this self-insurance allowance relates to lease owners or operators with a guarantor presently in place.
Although the U.S. Department of the Interior under the Trump Administration ultimately rescinded the 2016 NTL in 2020, the Biden Administration could seek to reconsider the changes made by the U.S. Department of the Interior under the Trump Administration and, should the Biden Administration re-issue and fully implement guidance or rules analogous to, or more rigorous than, the 2016 NTL, such developments could increase operating costs for lease owners and operators in the Gulf of Mexico and reduce the availability of surety bonds due to the increased demands for such bonds. As a result, there is significant uncertainty surrounding financial assurance obligations for Gulf of Mexico lease owners and operators and for us through the third-party indemnity agreements we have provided for Maritech liabilities to the U.S. Department of the Interior and/or to third parties through our private guarantees.
The U.S. Department of the Interior also recently increased its estimates for decommissioning liabilities in the Gulf of Mexico, causing the potential need for additional supplemental bonding and/or other financial assurances to be dramatically increased. When coupled with the volatile prices of oil and gas, it is difficult to predict the impact of the rule and regulatory changes already promulgated and as may be forthcoming by the U.S. Department of the Interior relating to financial assurance for decommissioning liabilities. Any revisions to the U.S. Department of the Interior’s supplemental bonding process could result in demands for the posting of increased financial assurances by owners and operators in the Gulf of Mexico, including Maritech, Orinoco and the other entities to whom Maritech divested its Gulf of Mexico assets, but such demands cannot be directly placed on us due to the fact that we are only a former parent company of Maritech and are only a guarantor as opposed to an actual lease owner or operator. This may force lease owners and operators of leases and other infrastructure in the Gulf of Mexico to obtain surety bonds or other forms of financial assurance, the costs of which could be significant. Moreover, anticipated changes to the bonding and financial assurance program for the Gulf of Mexico could result in the loss of supplemental bonding waivers for a large number of lease owners and operators of infrastructure in the Gulf of Mexico, which could in turn force these owners and operators to seek additional surety bonds which could exceed the surety bond market’s ability to provide such additional financial assurance. Lease owners and operators who have already leveraged their assets could face difficulty obtaining surety bonds because of concerns the surety may have about the priority of their liens on their collateral as well as the creditworthiness of such lease owners and operators. Consequently, anticipated changes to the bonding and financial assurance program could result in additional lease owners and operators in the Gulf of Mexico initiating bankruptcy proceedings, which in turn could result in the U.S. Department of the Interior seeking to impose decommissioning costs on predecessors in interest and providers of third-party indemnity agreements in the event that the current lease owners and/or operators cannot meet their decommissioning obligations. As a result, this could increase the risk that we may be required to step in and satisfy remaining decommissioning liabilities of Maritech and any buyer of the Maritech properties, including Orinoco, through our third-party indemnity agreements and private guarantees, which obligations could be significant and could adversely affect our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
We are exposed to significant credit risks.
We face credit risk associated with the significant amounts of accounts receivable we have with our customers in the energy industry. Many of our customers, particularly those associated with our onshore operations, are small- to medium-sized oil and gas operators that may be more susceptible to declines in oil and gas commodity prices or generally increased operating expenses than larger companies. Our ability to collect from our customers could be impacted by volatility in the oil and natural gas price environment and we may face increased credit risks if the price of oil were to fall and remain low for an extended period of time.
As discussed in the preceding risk factors, we face the risk of having to satisfy decommissioning liabilities on properties presently or formerly owned by Maritech. Continued decreased oil and natural gas prices have resulted in reduced revenues and cash flows for oil and gas lease owners and operators, including companies that have purchased Maritech properties or are joint owners in properties presently and formerly owned by Maritech and from whom Maritech is entitled to receive payments upon satisfaction of certain decommissioning obligations. Consequently, we face credit risk associated with the ability of these companies to satisfy their decommissioning liabilities. If these companies are unable to satisfy their obligations, it will increase the possibility that we will become liable for such decommissioning obligations in the future.
Our operating results and cash flows for certain of our subsidiaries are subject to foreign currency risk.
The operations of certain of our subsidiaries are exposed to fluctuations between the U.S. dollar and certain foreign currencies, particularly the euro, the British pound, the Mexican peso, and the Argentinian peso. Our plans to grow our international operations could cause this exposure from fluctuating currencies to increase. Historically, exchange rates of foreign currencies have fluctuated significantly compared to the U.S. dollar, and this exchange rate volatility is expected to continue. Significant fluctuations in foreign currencies against the U.S. dollar could adversely affect our balance sheet and results of operations.
We are exposed to interest rate risks with regard to our credit facility debt and future refinancing thereof.
As of December 31, 2021, we had $1.6 million outstanding balance under our ABL Credit Agreement and $163.1 million outstanding under our Term Credit Agreement. These credit facilities consist of floating rate loans that bear interest at an agreed upon percentage rate spread above London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) or an alternate base rate. Accordingly, whenever we have amounts outstanding under these facilities, our cash flows and results of operations will be subject to interest rate risk exposure associated with the debt balance outstanding. We currently are not a party to an interest rate swap contract or other derivative instrument designed to hedge our exposure to interest rate fluctuation risk.
Our ABL Credit Agreement is scheduled to mature on May 31, 2025. Our Term Loan Agreement is scheduled to mature on September 10, 2025. There can be no assurance that financial market conditions or borrowing terms at the times these existing debt agreements are renegotiated will be as favorable as the current terms and interest rates. We may be unable to obtain financing in the future for working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions, debt service requirements, or other purposes.
Legal, Regulatory, and Political Risks
Our operations are subject to extensive and evolving U.S. and foreign federal, state and local laws and regulatory requirements that increase our operating costs and expose us to potential fines, penalties, and litigation.
Laws and regulations govern our operations, including those relating to corporate governance, employees, taxation, fees, importation and exportation restrictions, environmental affairs, health and safety, and the manufacture, storage, handling, transportation, use, and sale of chemical products. Certain foreign countries impose additional restrictions on our activities, such as currency restrictions and restrictions on various labor practices. These laws and regulations are becoming increasingly complex and stringent, and compliance is becoming increasingly expensive. Governmental authorities have the power to enforce compliance with these regulations, and violators are subject to civil and criminal penalties, including civil fines, and injunctions. Third parties may also have the right to pursue legal actions to enforce compliance with certain laws and regulations. It is possible that increasingly strict environmental, health and safety laws, regulations, and enforcement policies could result in substantial costs and liabilities to us.
For example, the EPA has asserted federal regulatory authority under the Safe Drinking Water Act Underground Injection Control program over certain hydraulic fracturing activities involving the use of diesel fuels and published permitting guidance for such activities and issued a final regulation under the Clean Water Act prohibiting discharges to publicly owned treatment works of wastewater from onshore unconventional oil and gas facilities. Additionally, in December 2016, the EPA released its final report on the potential impacts of hydraulic fracturing on drinking water resources, concluding that “water cycle” activities associated with hydraulic fracturing may impact drinking water resources under certain limited circumstances. Certain environmental and other groups have suggested that additional federal, state, and local laws and regulations may be needed to more closely regulate the hydraulic fracturing process. Several states have adopted regulations that require operators to disclose
the chemical constituents in hydraulic fracturing fluids. We cannot predict whether any federal, state or local laws or regulations will be enacted regarding hydraulic fracturing, and, if so, what actions any such laws or regulations would require or prohibit. Other jurisdictions where our products and services are used may impose similar or more stringent restrictions. If additional levels of regulation or permitting requirements were imposed on oil and gas operators through the adoption of new laws and regulations, the demand for certain of our products and services could be decreased or subject to delays.
We operate in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico. At this time, we cannot predict the full impact that other regulatory actions that may be mandated by the federal government may have on our operations or the operations of our customers. Other governmental or regulatory actions could further reduce our revenues and increase our operating costs, including the cost to insure offshore operations, resulting in reduced cash flows and profitability.
Our onshore and offshore operations, including operations related to energy storage and carbon capture, utilization and storage, expose us to risks such as the potential for harmful substances escaping into the environment and causing damages or injuries, which could be substantial. We maintain limited environmental liability insurance covering named locations and environmental risks associated with contract services for oil and gas operations. We could be materially and adversely affected by an enforcement proceeding or a claim that is not covered or is only partially covered by insurance.
Because our business depends on the level of activity in the oil and natural gas industry, existing or future laws, regulations, treaties, or international agreements that impose additional restrictions on the industry may adversely affect our financial results. Regulators are becoming more focused on-air emissions from oil and gas operations, including volatile organic compounds, hazardous air pollutants, and GHGs. In particular, the focus on GHGs and climate change, including incentives to conserve energy or use alternative energy sources, could have a negative impact on our financial results if such laws, regulations, treaties, or international agreements reduce the worldwide demand for oil and natural gas or otherwise result in reduced economic activity generally. In addition, such laws, regulations, treaties, or international agreements could result in increased compliance costs, capital spending requirements, or additional operating restrictions for us, which may have a negative impact on our financial results.
In addition to increasing our risk of environmental liability, the rigorous enforcement of environmental laws and regulations has accelerated demand for our products and services in some of the markets we serve. For more information on the environmental laws and regulations to which we are subject, see our disclosures titled “Health, Safety, and Environmental Affairs Regulation” set forth in Item 1 of this Annual Report.
Our operations, and those of our suppliers and customers, are subject to a series of risks arising from climate change.
The threat of climate change continues to attract considerable attention in the United States and in foreign countries. As a result, our operations as well as the operations of our oil and natural gas exploration and production customers and our suppliers are subject to a series of regulatory, political, litigation, and financial risks associated with the production and processing of fossil fuels and emission of GHGs.
In the United States, no comprehensive climate change legislation has been implemented at the federal level. However, President Biden has highlighted addressing climate change as a priority of his administration and has issued several executive orders addressing climate change. Moreover, following the U.S. Supreme Court finding that GHG emissions constitute a pollutant under the CAA, the EPA has adopted regulations that, among other things, establish construction and operating permit reviews for GHG emissions from certain large stationary sources, require the monitoring and annual reporting of GHG emissions from certain petroleum and natural gas system sources in the United States, and together with the DOT, implementing GHG emissions limits on vehicles manufactured for operation in the United States. The regulation of methane from oil and gas facilities has been subject to uncertainty in recent years. In September 2020, the Trump Administration revised prior regulations to rescind certain methane standards and remove the transmission and storage segments from the source category for certain regulations. However, subsequently, the U.S. Congress approved, and President Biden signed into law, a resolution under the Congressional Review Act to repeal the September 2020 revisions, effectively reinstating the prior standards. Additionally, in November 2021, EPA issued a proposed rule that, if finalized, would establish OOOO(b) new source and OOOO(c) first-time existing source standards of performance for methane and volatile organic compound emissions for oil and gas facilities. Operators of affected facilities will have to comply with
specific standards of performance to include leak detection using optical gas imaging and subsequent repair requirement, and reduction of emissions by 95% through capture and control systems. EPA plans to issue a supplemental proposal in 2022 containing additional requirements not included in the November 2021 proposed rule and anticipates the issuance of a final rule by the end of the year. We cannot predict the scope of any final methane regulatory requirements or the cost to comply with such requirements. However, given the long-term trend toward increasing regulation, future federal GHG regulations of the oil and gas industry remain a significant possibility.
Separately, various states and groups of states have adopted or are considering adopting legislation, regulation or other regulatory initiatives that are focused on such areas as GHG cap and trade programs, carbon taxes, reporting and tracking programs, and restriction of emissions. At the international level, the United Nations-sponsored "Paris Agreement" requires member states to submit non-binding, individually determined reduction goals known as Nationally Determined Contributions (“NDCs”) every five years after 2020. Following President Biden’s executive order in January 2021, the United States rejoined the Paris Agreement and, in April 2021, established a goal of reducing economy wide net GHG emissions 50-52% below 2005 levels by 2030. Additionally, at the 26th Conference of the Parties (“COP26”) in Glasgow in November 2021, the United States and the European Union jointly announced the launch of a Global Methane Pledge; an initiative committing to a collective goal of reducing global methane emissions by at least 30 percent from 2020 levels by 2030, including “all feasible reductions” in the energy sector. The full impact of these actions is uncertain at this time, and it is unclear what additional initiatives may be adopted or implemented that may have adverse effects upon us and our customers’ operations.
Governmental, scientific, and public concern over the threat of climate change arising from GHG emissions has resulted in increasing political risks in the United States, including action taken by President Biden with respect to his climate change related pledges. On January 27, 2021, President Biden issued an executive order that called for substantial action on climate change, including, among other things, the increased use of zero-emission vehicles by the federal government, the elimination of subsidies provided to the fossil fuel industry, and increased emphasis on climate-related risks across government agencies and economic sectors. The Biden Administration has also called for restrictions on leasing on federal land. For more information, see our risk factor titled “Regulatory initiatives related to hydraulic fracturing in the countries where we and our customers operate could result in operating restrictions or delays in the completion of oil and gas wells that may reduce demand for our services.” Other actions that could be pursued by the Biden Administration may include the imposition of more restrictive requirements for the establishment of pipeline infrastructure or the permitting of LNG export facilities, as well as more restrictive GHG emission limitations for oil and gas facilities. Litigation risks are also increasing as a number of parties have sought to bring suit against oil and natural gas companies in state or federal court, alleging among other things, that such companies created public nuisances by producing fuels that contributed to climate change or alleging that the companies have been aware of the adverse effects of climate change for some time but defrauded their investors or customers by failing to adequately disclose those impacts.
There are also increasing financial risks for companies in the fossil fuel sector as shareholders currently invested in such companies may elect in the future to shift some or all of their investments into other sectors. Institutional lenders who provide financing to fossil fuel energy companies also have become more attentive to sustainable lending practices and some of them may elect not to provide funding for fossil fuel energy companies. For example, at COP26, the Glasgow Financial Alliance for Net Zero (“GFANZ”) announced that commitments from over 450 firms across 45 countries had resulted in over $130 trillion in capital committed to net zero goals. The various sub-alliances of GFANZ generally require participants to set short-term, sector-specific targets to transition their financing, investing, and/or underwriting activities to net zero emissions by 2050. There is also a risk that financial institutions will be required to adopt policies that have the effect of reducing the funding provided to the fossil fuel sector. In late 2020, the Federal Reserve announced that it had joined the Network for Greening the Financial System (“NGFS”), a consortium of financial regulators focused on addressing climate-related risks in the financial sector. Subsequently, in November 2021, the Federal Reserve issued a statement in support of the efforts of the NGFS to identify key issues and potential solutions for the climate-related challenges most relevant to central banks and supervisory authorities. Although we cannot predict the effects of these actions, such limitation of investments in and financing for fossil fuel energy companies could result in the restriction, delay or cancellation of drilling programs or development or production activities, which could reduce demand for our products and services. Additionally, the Securities and Exchange Commission announced its intention to promulgate rules requiring climate disclosures. Although the form and substance of these requirements is not yet known, this may result in additional costs to comply with any such disclosure requirements.
The adoption and implementation of new or more stringent international, federal or state legislation, regulations or other regulatory initiatives that impose more stringent standards for GHG emissions from the oil and natural gas sector or otherwise restrict the areas in which this sector may produce oil and natural gas or generate the GHG emissions could result in increased costs of compliance or costs of consuming, and thereby reduce demand for oil and natural gas, which could reduce demand for our products and services. Additionally, political, litigation and financial risks may result in our oil and natural gas operators restricting or cancelling production activities, incurring liability for infrastructure damages as a result of climatic changes, or impairing their ability to continue to operate in an economic manner, which also could reduce the demand for our products and services. One or more of these developments could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operation.
Climate change may also result in various physical risks, such as the increased frequency or intensity of extreme weather events or changes in meteorological and hydrological patterns, that could adversely impact us, our customers’, and our suppliers’ operations. Such physical risks may result in damage to our customers’ facilities or otherwise adversely impact their operations, such as if they become subject to water use curtailments in response to drought, or demand for their products, such as to the extent warmer winters reduce the demand for energy for heating purposes, which may ultimately reduce demand for the products and services we provide. Such physical risks may also impact our suppliers, which may adversely affect our ability to provide our products and services.
Increased attention to ESG matters and conservation measures may adversely impact our or our customers’ business.
Increasing attention to, and societal expectations on companies to address, climate change and other environmental and social impacts, investor and societal expectations regarding voluntary ESG disclosures, and consumer demand for alternative forms of energy may result in increased costs, reduced demand for our customers’ products, reduced profits, increased investigations and litigation, and negative impacts on our stock price and access to capital markets. Increasing attention to climate change and environmental conservation, for example, may result in demand shifts for oil and natural gas products and additional governmental investigations and private litigation against us or our customers. To the extent that societal pressures or political or other factors are involved, it is possible that such liability could be imposed without regard to our causation of or contribution to the asserted damage, or to other mitigating factors. For more information, see our risk factor titled “Our operations, and those of our suppliers and customers, are subject to a series of risks arising from climate change.”
Moreover, while we may create and publish voluntary disclosures regarding ESG matters from time to time, certain statements in those voluntary disclosures may be based on hypothetical expectations and assumptions that may or may not be representative of current or actual risks or events or forecasts of expected risks or events, including the costs associated therewith. Such expectations and assumptions are necessarily uncertain and may be prone to error or subject to misinterpretation given the long timelines involved and the lack of an established single approach to identifying, measuring and reporting on many ESG matters. Additionally, we may announce various targets or product and service offerings in an attempt to improve our ESG profile. However, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to meet any such targets or that such targets or offerings will have the intended results on our ESG profile, including but not limited to as a result of unforeseen costs, consequences, or technical difficulties associated with such targets or offerings. Also, despite any voluntary actions, we may receive pressure from certain investors, lenders, or other groups to adopt more aggressive climate or other ESG-related goals or policies, but we cannot guarantee that we will be able to implement such goals because of potential costs or technical or operational obstacles.
In addition, organizations that provide information to investors on corporate governance and related matters have developed ratings processes for evaluating companies on their approach to ESG matters. Such ratings are used by some investors to inform their investment and voting decisions. Unfavorable ESG ratings and recent activism directed at shifting funding away from companies with energy-related assets could lead to increased negative investor sentiment toward us and our industry and to the diversion of investment to other industries, which could have a negative impact on our stock price and our access to and costs of capital. Additionally, to the extent ESG matters negatively impact our reputation, we may not be able to compete as effectively to recruit or retain employees, which may adversely affect our operations.
Such ESG matters may also impact our customers, which may result in reduced demand for certain of our products and services. We also cannot guarantee that any new product or service offerings we develop in light of ESG matters, including but not limited to the energy transition, will be suitable for our customers’ business operations. To the extent alternative technologies are preferred, whether as a result of regulatory impacts or changes in industry practice, it may adversely impact our business or results of operation.
Our operations in foreign countries exposes us to complex regulations and may present us with new obstacles to growth.
We plan to continue to grow both in the United States and in foreign countries. We have established operations in Argentina, Brazil, Finland, Ghana, Mexico, Norway, Saudi Arabia, Sweden, and the United Kingdom, as well as other foreign countries. Foreign operations carry special risks. Our business in the countries in which we currently operate and those in which we may operate in the future could be limited or disrupted by:
•restrictions on repatriating cash back to the United States;
•the impact of compliance with anti-corruption laws on our operations and competitive position in affected countries and the risk that actions taken by us or our agents may violate those laws;
•government controls and government actions, such as expropriation of assets and changes in legal and regulatory environments;
•import and export license requirements;
•political, social, or economic instability;
•trade restrictions;
•changes in tariffs and taxes; and
•our limited knowledge of these markets or our inability to protect our interests.
We and our affiliates operate in countries where governmental corruption has been known to exist. While we and our subsidiaries are committed to conducting business in a legal and ethical manner, there is a risk of violating the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, the U.K Bribery Act, or laws or legislation promulgated pursuant to the 1997 OECD Convention on Combating Bribery of Foreign Public Officials in International Business Transactions or other applicable anti-corruption regulations that generally prohibit the making of improper payments to foreign officials for the purpose of obtaining or keeping business. Violation of these laws could result in monetary penalties against us or our subsidiaries and could damage our reputation and our ability to do business.
Foreign governments and agencies often establish permit and regulatory standards different from those in the U.S. If we cannot obtain foreign regulatory approvals, or if we cannot obtain them in a timely manner, our growth and profitability from foreign operations could be adversely affected.
Regulatory initiatives related to hydraulic fracturing in the countries where we and our customers operate could result in operating restrictions or delays in the completion of oil and gas wells that may reduce demand for our services.
Although we do not directly engage in hydraulic fracturing, our operations support many of our exploration and production customers in such activities. The practice continues to be controversial in certain parts of the country, resulting in increased scrutiny and regulation of the hydraulic fracturing process, including by federal and state agencies and local municipalities.
Hydraulic fracturing typically is regulated by state oil and gas commissions or similar state agencies, but several federal agencies have asserted regulatory authority over certain aspects of the process in the U.S. For example, the EPA has issued rulemakings under several laws governing hydraulic fracturing activities and disposal of wastes associated with the process. In 2016, the U.S. Bureau of Land Management (“BLM”) also published a final rule that established new or more stringent standards for performing hydraulic fracturing on federal and Indian lands. BLM under the Trump Administration issued a final rule in late 2018 rescinding the 2016 action; however, a California federal court vacated the 2018 final rule in July 2020, and a Wyoming federal court subsequently vacated the 2016 final rule in October 2020. Accordingly, the 2016 final rule is no longer in effect, but the Wyoming decision has been appealed. Moreover, the Biden Administration is expected to pursue regulatory initiatives that restrict hydraulic fracturing activities on federal lands as well as other actions to more stringently regulate certain aspects of oil and gas development such as air emissions and water discharges. President Biden issued an executive order on
January 27, 2021, that suspends new leasing activities, but not operations under existing leases, for oil and gas exploration and production on non-Indian federal lands and offshore waters pending completion of a comprehensive review and reconsideration of federal oil and gas permitting and leasing practices that take into consideration potential climate and other impacts associated with oil and gas activities on such lands and waters. Although the federal court for the Western District of Louisiana issued a preliminary injunction against the leasing pause, in response to the executive order, the Department of Interior issued a report recommending various changes to the federal leasing program, though many such changes would require Congressional action. As a result, we cannot predict the final scope of regulations or restrictions that may apply to oil and gas operations on federal lands and waters. However, any regulations that ban or effectively ban such operations may adversely impact demand for our products and services.
The United States Congress has from time to time considered legislation to provide for federal regulation of hydraulic fracturing and to require disclosure of the chemicals used in the hydraulic fracturing process. At the state level, some states, including Texas, Oklahoma and New Mexico, have adopted, and other states are considering adopting legal requirements that could impose new or more stringent permitting, public disclosure, or well construction requirements on hydraulic fracturing activities. States could elect to prohibit high volume hydraulic fracturing altogether, following the approach taken by the State of New York in 2015. Local governments also may seek to adopt ordinances within their jurisdictions regulating the time, place and manner of drilling activities in general or hydraulic fracturing activities in particular. If new or more stringent federal, state, or local legal restrictions relating to the hydraulic fracturing process are adopted, our customers could incur potentially significant added costs to comply with such requirements, experience delays or curtailment in the pursuit of exploration, development or production activities, and perhaps even be precluded from drilling wells.
Increased regulation and attention given to the hydraulic fracturing process could lead to greater opposition to oil and gas production activities using hydraulic fracturing techniques. Additional legislation or regulation could also lead to operational delays or increased operating costs for our customers in the production of oil and gas, including from the developing shale plays, or could make it more difficult to perform hydraulic fracturing. The adoption of any federal, state or local laws or the implementation of additional regulations regarding hydraulic fracturing could potentially cause a decrease in the completion of new oil and gas wells and an associated decrease in demand for our services and increased compliance costs and time, which could have a material adverse effect on our liquidity, consolidated results of operations, and consolidated financial condition.
Our proprietary rights may be violated or compromised, which could damage our operations.
We own numerous patents, patent applications, and unpatented trade secret technologies in the U.S. and certain foreign countries. There can be no assurance that the steps we have taken to protect our proprietary rights will be adequate to deter misappropriation of these rights. In addition, independent third parties may develop competitive or superior technologies.
Our operations and reputation may be impaired if our information technology systems fail to perform adequately or if we are the subject of a data breach or cyberattack.
Our information technology systems are critically important to operating our business efficiently. We rely on our information technology systems to manage our business data, communications, supply chain, customer invoicing, employee information, and other business processes. We outsource certain business process functions to third-party providers and similarly rely on these third parties to maintain and store confidential information on their systems. The failure of these information technology systems to perform as we anticipate could disrupt our business and could result in transaction errors, processing inefficiencies, and the loss of sales and customers, causing our business and results of operations to suffer.
Although we allocate significant resources to protect our information technology systems, we have experienced varying degrees of cyber-incidents in the normal conduct of our business, including viruses, worms, other destructive software, process breakdowns, phishing and other malicious activities. On January 6, 2020, the Department of Homeland Security issued a public warning that indicated companies in the energy industry might be specific targets of cybersecurity threats. Such breaches have in the past and could again in the future result in unauthorized access to information including customer, supplier, employee, or other company confidential data. We do carry insurance against these risks, although the potential damages we might incur could exceed our available insurance coverage. We also invest in security technology, perform penetration tests from time to time, and design our business processes to attempt to mitigate the risk of such breaches. However, there can be no assurance that
security breaches will not occur. Moreover, the development and maintenance of these measures requires continuous monitoring as technologies change and efforts to overcome security measures evolve. We have experienced and expect to continue to experience, cyber security threats and incidents, none of which has been material to us to date. However, a successful breach or attack could have a material negative impact on our operations or business reputation and subject us to consequences such as litigation and direct costs associated with incident response.
Changes to applicable tax laws and regulations or exposure to additional income tax liabilities could affect our business and future profitability.
We are subject to various complex and evolving United States federal, state, and local and non-U.S. taxes. Our business and future profitability could be affected by numerous factors, including the availability of tax credits, exemptions, refunds and other benefits to reduce our tax liabilities, changes in the relative amount of our earnings subject to tax in the various jurisdictions in which we operate or have subsidiaries, the potential expansion of our business into or otherwise becoming subject to tax in additional jurisdictions, changes to our existing business structure and operations, the extent of our intercompany transactions, and the extent to which taxing authorities in the relevant jurisdictions respect those intercompany transactions.
Further, United States federal, state, and local and non-U.S. tax laws, policies, statutes, rules, regulations, or ordinances could be interpreted, changed, modified, or applied adversely to us, in each case, possibly with retroactive effect, and may have an adverse effect on our business and future profitability. For example, several tax proposals have been set forth that would, if enacted, make significant changes to United States tax laws. Such proposals include an increase in the U.S. income tax rate applicable to corporations (such as us) from 21%, the imposition of a minimum tax on book income for certain corporations, and the imposition of an excise tax on certain corporate stock repurchases that would be borne by the corporation repurchasing such stock. The United States Congress may consider, and could include, some or all of these proposals in connection with tax reform that may be undertaken. It is unclear whether these or similar changes will be enacted and, if enacted, how soon any such changes could take effect. The passage of any legislation as a result of these proposals and other similar changes in United States federal income tax laws could adversely affect our business and future profitability.

---

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments.
None.

---

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
Item 2. Properties.
Our facilities consist primarily of our corporate headquarters facility, chemical plants, processing plants and distribution facilities. We believe our facilities are adequate for our present needs. We also hold brine leases on acreage which contains bromine and lithium. The following information describes facilities that we (i) leased or owned and (ii) leased acreage as of December 31, 2021.
Facilities
Completion Fluids & Products Division
Our Completion Fluids & Products Division facilities include six operating chemical production plants located in the states of Arkansas, California, Louisiana, and West Virginia, and the country of Finland, having a total production capacity of more than 1.1 million equivalent liquid tons per year. The two California locations consist of 29 square miles of leased mineral acreage and solar evaporation ponds, and related owned production and storage facilities.
In April 2020, in response to market conditions, we began the process of discontinuing chemical production operations at our El Dorado calcium chloride facility in Arkansas. We continued to manufacture and deliver products through early June 2020, at which time we began a sequenced shutdown of the manufacturing facility. As of December 31, 2020 and continuing through December 31, 2021, the plant was no longer operational.
In addition to the production facilities described above, the Completion Fluids & Products Division owns or leases multiple service center facilities in the United States and in other countries. The Completion Fluids &
Products Division also leases several offices and numerous terminal locations in the United States and in other countries.
Water & Flowback Services Division
The Water & Flowback Services Division conducts its operations through production testing and water management service centers (most of which are leased) in the United States, located in Colorado, Louisiana, New Mexico, North Dakota, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Texas and Wyoming. In addition, the Water & Flowback Services Division has leased facilities in Mexico, Argentina and certain countries in Asia, Europe, and the Middle East.
Corporate
Our headquarters is located in The Woodlands, Texas, in a 153,000 square foot office building, which is located on 2.6 acres of land, under a lease that expires in 2027. In addition, we own a 28,000 square foot technical facility in The Woodlands, Texas, to service our Completion Fluids & Products and Water & Flowback Services Divisions’ operations.
Bromine and Lithium Exploration Targets
Our Completion Fluids & Products Division leases approximately 31,100 net acres of brine leases in Magnolia, Arkansas, which contain bromine and lithium. This acreage is leased for possible future development and as a source of supply for our bromine and other raw materials. In August 2021, we announced the completion of a preliminary technical assessment by an independent geological consulting firm, APEX Geoscience Ltd. to assess lithium and bromine exploration targets in our approximately 31,100 net acres of brine leases in the Smackover Formation in Southwest Arkansas. We have rights to the brine, including rights to the bromine and lithium contained in the brine underlying this acreage, pursuant to certain brine leases and brine deeds with various landowners. With respect to approximately 27,500 acres of that total acreage, we have granted Standard Lithium an option to acquire the lithium rights. The agreements governing this option contemplate a 2.5% royalty.
The exploration targets were estimated for two separate areas within the property based on our brine lease rights. The scope of the exploration target assessment was for bromine in all of the approximately 31,100 net acres and lithium for the acreage where we hold the lithium rights not subject to the Standard Lithium Ltd. option that cover roughly 3,600 net acres. For bromine, the technical assessment identified a brine exploration target estimated to contain between 2.54 and 8.58 million tons of elemental bromine. For lithium, the technical assessment identified an exploration target estimated to contain between 16,000 and 53,000 tons of elemental lithium. Using an elemental to Lithium Carbonate Equivalent ("LCE") conversion ratio of 5.323, which is accepted in the industry, the estimates of the amounts of lithium present within these acres range from 85,000 to 286,000 tons of LCE. As of February 2022, the market price for lithium is approximately $71,600 per ton and the market price for bromine is approximately $3,100 per metric ton. The exploration target's estimated quantity and grade is conceptual in nature, as there has been insufficient exploration to estimate a mineral resource on this property, and it is uncertain if further exploration will result in the estimation of a mineral resource. The exploration targets expressed should not be understood to represent or misconstrued as an estimate of a mineral resource or mineral reserve.
The basis for the lithium and bromine exploration targets is that hypersaline formation water, or brine, associated with some of the world’s oilfields and/or geothermal fields contains confined reservoirs, or aquifers, that are known to contain anomalous concentrations of lithium, bromine and other elements of interest. We propose to assess stratigraphically deep (more than 2,250 meters or 7,450 feet below surface) brine from oil and gas aquifers associated with the Late Jurassic Smackover Formation. The brine is currently pumped from the aquifer to the earth’s surface as a wastewater product associated with hydrocarbon production (e.g., oil, gas, and condensate). We expect that we will be able to develop or utilize evolving commercial technologies to economically remove the bromine and lithium from the brine underlying our acreage before the brine is reinjected back down into the subsurface aquifer.
The volume of the Upper and Middle areas of the Smackover Formation within each exploration target was calculated by wireframing the Smackover Formation aquifer domain to create a 3-D geological model. The model utilized oil and gas well data from the AOGC and AGS Information Circular IC-14, which includes an electronic reprint of Vestal (1950) and a stratigraphic horizon pick file with 3,904 records. Historical information was used to estimate mean porosity and mean bromine and lithium concentrations. For the conceptual exploration target
estimates, the range of elemental bromine and lithium was derived by multiplying the mean volume, porosity, and bromine/lithium concentrations of the exploration targets by plus or minus 20%.
While we continue to evaluate the next steps regarding the potential development of our brine leases, we have only recently started to conduct exploration work on the leases, and we are not currently able to determine the economic viability of the extraction of the lithium and bromine from the leased acreage. In addition, the extraction of lithium and bromine from these brine leases will likely require a significant amount of time and capital, which we are not able to estimate at this time. The exploration targets are based on historical oil and gas well data and historical Smackover Formation brine geochemical analyses. To advance the exploration targets to the mineral resource estimation and classification stage, we anticipate the implementation of a work program that will comprise some or all of the following activities:
•validating the historical brine geochemistry and attempting to obtain a greater understanding of the distribution of the bromine and lithium concentrations within the Smackover Formation brine underlying our acreage,
•conducting stratigraphic and hydrogeological studies to advance the geological domain boundaries and hydro-parameters of the Upper and Middle areas of the Smackover Formation, and
•conducting mineral processing test work to explore and develop the bromine and lithium extraction processes.
The timing for progressing the recommended work program will depend on the approach for obtaining Smackover Formation brine samples and conducting mineral processing test work. We anticipate achieving brine access through agreements with current oil and gas operators to conduct appraisal drilling within the first half of 2022. As of February 25, 2022, we are in the process of drilling an exploratory brine well on our dedicated acreage in the Smackover Formation in Arkansas. The results of the well, which is expected to be completed in the first quarter of 2022, are expected to advance our exploratory target lithium and bromine assets to more refined resources targets. Upon completion of the inferred resources target, we intend to move towards a preliminary economic assessment (“PEA”) to determine the economics of developing our dedicated acreage for the bromine to meet our growing zinc bromide opportunities and to meet the lithium battery market demands. The PEA is expected to be completed during 2022.
We anticipate that validation of the estimates for geology, mineralization, and mineral processing, would advance the confidence level of the deposit toward mineral resource estimations and a potential preliminary economic assessment study. This work is anticipated to commence and be completed in 2022 and it is possible that the exploration target tonnage and grade could change as these proposed exploration activities are completed and evaluated.

---

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
Item 3. Legal Proceedings.
We are named defendants in numerous lawsuits and respondents in certain governmental proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business. While the outcome of lawsuits or other proceedings against us cannot be predicted with certainty, management does not consider it reasonably possible that a loss resulting from such lawsuits or other proceedings in excess of any amounts accrued has been incurred that is expected to have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or liquidity. See Note 11 - “Commitments and Contingencies” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further information.

---

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURE
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.
None.
PART II

---

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY
Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters, and Issuer Repurchases of Equity Securities.
Common Stock
Our common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “TTI.” As of February 25, 2022, there were approximately 220 holders of record of the common stock. The actual number of holders of our common stock is greater than this number of record holders and includes common stockholders who are beneficial owners but whose shares are held in street name by banks, brokers and other nominees.
Market Price of Common Stock
The following graph compares the five-year cumulative total returns of our common stock, the Russell 2000 Index (“Russell 2000”) and the Philadelphia Oil Service Sector Index (“PHLX Oil Service”), assuming $100 invested in each stock or index on December 31, 2016, all dividends reinvested, and a fiscal year ending December 31. This information shall be deemed furnished, and not filed, in this Form 10-K and shall not be deemed incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as a result of this furnishing, except to the extent we specifically incorporate it by reference.
Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans
For additional information about common stock authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans, see Note 13 - “Equity-Based Compensation and Other” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

---

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
Item 6. [Reserved]

---

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
The following discussion is intended to analyze major elements of our consolidated financial statements and provide insight into important areas of management’s focus. This section should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and the accompanying Notes included elsewhere in this Annual Report. Statements in the following discussion may include forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties. See “Item 1A. Risk Factors” for additional discussion of these factors and risks. For discussion of 2020 compared to 2019, see disclosures titled “Results of Operations” set forth in Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020 filed with the SEC on March 5, 2021.
Business Overview
We are an industrial oil and gas products and services company operating on six continents, focused on bromine-based completion fluids, calcium chloride, water management solutions, frac flowback and production well testing services. We operate through two reporting segments - Completion Fluids & Products Division and Water & Flowback Services Division.
After declining to historic lows due to depressed oil prices resulting from Russia and Saudi Arabia’s price war and the COVID-19 pandemic last year, customer activity levels in the North America onshore business began to recover during the first half of 2021. Customer activity levels continued to improve through the second half of 2021 as oil prices continued to improve, averaging over $70 per barrel for the third and fourth quarters, while natural gas prices averaged over $4 per million Btu.
Completions Fluids & Products Division revenues were lower than the prior year due to lower Gulf of Mexico and international oil and gas activity and global shipping delays, partially offset by an increase in industrial chemicals product sales. In July 2021, we completed our first International TETRA CS Neptune® fluids job, reflecting acceptance of this proprietary technology into new markets. We also saw a significant rebound in our international business, particularly in completion fluid sales during the fourth quarter of 2021.
Our Water & Flowback Services revenues increased significantly compared to the prior year, due to a combination of higher overall customer activity levels and significant price recovery, particularly in the United States land business. Our international production testing business also improved during the fourth quarter of 2021. We also deployed our TETRA SandStormTM technology for two major long-term projects in Latin America. Revenue growth was a result of a record increase in the number of integrated projects and customers, and TETRA SandStormTM high utilization and market share gains with private oil and gas operators.
We are also committed to pursuing low-carbon energy initiatives that leverage our fluids and aqueous chemistry core competencies, our significant bromine and lithium assets (including our approximately 31,100 net acres of brine leases in Arkansas) and technologies, and our leading calcium chloride production capabilities. In May 2021, we signed a MOU with CarbonFree. During the one-year MOU period, both Companies will work towards a definitive agreement that might include investments by TETRA into CarbonFree, a joint venture, or other commercial arrangements. In December 2021, we invested $5.0 million in a convertible note issued by CarbonFree.
In August 2021, we announced completion of a preliminary technical assessment by an independent geological consulting firm to assess lithium and bromine exploration targets in our Southwest Arkansas brine leases. Bromine has been identified as a key mineral resource in zinc-bromide energy storage systems and our TETRA PureFlow™ high purity zinc bromide has been qualified by several battery technology companies. The lithium battery market is a rapidly growing market, affording us the opportunity to participate in a meaningful way. We will assess the next steps towards determining whether we can develop these key minerals to augment our current global infrastructure and chemistry expertise, allowing us to further expand beyond the oil and gas market. In December, 2021, we announced a strategic agreement with Eos involving a long-term supply and collaboration agreement to supply our high purity zinc bromide solution, TETRA PureFlowTM. TETRA and Eos expect to collaborate for improved battery performance, cost and system life including an end-of-life solution using TETRA's extensive experience with reclaiming and recycling zinc bromide.
Substantially all of our former Compression Division’s operations were conducted through our partially-owned CSI Compressco subsidiary. On January 29, 2021, we entered into the Purchase and Sale Agreement pursuant to which we sold the general partner of CSI Compressco, including IDRs in CSI Compressco and
approximately 23.1% of the outstanding limited partner interests in CSI Compressco, in exchange for a combination of $13.9 million in cash and $3.1 million in contingent consideration in the form of cash and/or CSI Compressco common units if CSI Compressco achieves certain financial target on or before December 31, 2022. As of December 31, 2021, we held an interest in CSI Compressco consisting of approximately 3.8% of the outstanding common units. We recorded a book gain of $120.1 million during 2021 in connection with the GP Sale. This gain, most of which was non-cash, was a function of CSI Compressco having a negative carrying value within our consolidated balance sheet due to our share of cumulative losses and distributions. We have reflected the operations of our former Compression Division as discontinued operations for all periods presented. See Note 3 - “Discontinued Operations” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further information.
During the first quarter of 2021, we used proceeds from the GP sale and available cash on hand, including $14.2 million of proceeds from the fourth quarter 2020 compressor unit sales to Spartan, to pay down $29.3 million on our term loan, which matures in September 2025. During the fourth quarter of 2021, we sold the 1.6 million Standard Lithium Ltd. shares we owned for approximately $17.6 million, before broker and transaction fees. We repaid an additional $8.2 million of our term loan in July 2021 and $13.0 million of our term loan in December 2021. Our liquidity at the end of the fourth quarter was $67.7 million consisting of $31.6 million of unrestricted cash plus $36.1 million of availability under the ABL Credit Agreement.
Results of Operations
The following data should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and the associated Notes contained elsewhere in this report.
Consolidated Comparisons
Year Ended
December 31, Period to Period Change
2021 2020 2021 vs. 2020 % Change
(In Thousands, Except Percentages)
Revenues $ 388,272 $ 377,715 $ 10,557 2.8 %
Gross profit 59,237 67,543 (8,306) (12.3) %
Gross profit as a percentage of revenue
15.3 % 17.9 %
General and administrative expense 75,049 76,697 (1,648) (2.1) %
General and administrative expense as a percentage of revenue
19.3 % 20.3 %
Interest expense, net 16,377 18,926 (2,549) (13.5) %
Gain on sale of assets (1,040) (2,878) 1,838 (63.9) %
Other income, net (16,428) (116) (16,312) NM(1)
Loss before taxes and discontinued operations (14,721) (25,086) 10,365 (41.3) %
Loss before taxes and discontinued operations as a percentage of revenue
(3.8) % (6.6) %
Provision for income taxes 2,084 1,758 326 18.5 %
Loss before discontinued operations (16,805) (26,844) 10,039 (37.4) %
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes 120,407 (72,089) 192,496 (267.0) %
Net income (loss) 103,602 (98,933) 202,535 (204.7) %
(Income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interest (269) 47,790 (48,059) (100.6) %
Net loss attributable to TETRA stockholders $ 103,333 $ (51,143) $ 154,476 (302.0) %
(1) Percent change is not meaningful
Revenues
Consolidated revenues for 2021 increased compared to the prior year primarily due to higher activity in our Water & Flowback Services division, where revenue increased by $33.6 million. The increase in our Water & Flowback Services division is primarily due to increasing customer activity levels from recent lows in response to an improving commodity price environment in 2021 and recovery from industry downturn in 2021 related to the COVID-19 pandemic. The increase in consolidated revenue was offset by decreased revenue in our Completion
Fluids & Products division of $23.0 million, primarily due to lower Gulf of Mexico and international oil and gas activity. See “Divisional Comparisons” section below for additional discussion.
Gross Profit
Consolidated gross profit as a percentage of revenue declined primarily due to a change in revenue mix, with a higher portion of revenues generated from our Water & Flowback Services division. See Divisional Comparisons section below for additional discussion.
General and Administrative Expense
Consolidated general and administrative expenses decreased during 2021 compared to the prior year primarily due to a $6.1 million decrease in bad debt expense. This was offset by a $1.6 million increase in salary related expenses, primarily due to a phased reinstatement of reduced salaries and 401K match; a $1.9 million increase in legal, settlement and other expenses, and a $1.0 million increase in general expenses.
Interest Expense, Net
Consolidated interest expense, net, decreased in 2021 compared to the prior year primarily due to $50.5 million of repayments on our term credit facility during the current year.
Gain on Sale of Assets
Consolidated gain on sale of assets decreased during 2021 compared to the prior year primarily due to decreased asset sales during the year.
Other Income, net
Consolidated other (income) expense, net increased during 2021 compared to the prior year primarily due to an $11.7 million increase in income from our investment in Standard Lithium due to an increase in the Standard Lithium stock price and additional shares received in May 2021. All Standard Lithium shares were sold in the fourth quarter of 2021. Additionally, we benefited from favorable foreign exchange fluctuations of $4.1 million.
Income (Loss) from Discontinued Operations
Income from discontinued operations, net of taxes, was $120.4 million compared to a loss of $72.1 million for the prior year, including $20.8 million of asset impairments. The current year income includes a $120.1 million primarily non-cash accounting gain from the deconsolidation of CSI Compressco. This gain is net of a $0.01 million tax provision after taking into consideration utilization of net operating loss and credit carryforwards.
Provision for Income Tax
Our consolidated provision for income taxes during 2021 was primarily attributable to taxes in certain foreign jurisdictions and Texas gross margin taxes. Our consolidated effective tax rate for the year ended December 31, 2021 of negative 14.2% was primarily the result of losses generated in entities for which no related tax benefit has been recorded. The losses generated by these entities do not result in tax benefits due to offsetting valuation allowances being recorded against the related net deferred tax assets. We establish a valuation allowance to reduce the deferred tax assets when it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. Included in our deferred tax assets are $114.6 million of net operating loss carryforwards that may be available to offset future income tax liabilities in the U.S. as well as in certain international jurisdictions where net operating loss carryforwards exist.
Divisional Comparisons
Completion Fluids & Products Division
Year Ended
December 31, Period to Period Change
2021 2020 2021 vs. 2020 % Change
(In Thousands, Except Percentages)
Revenues $ 219,648 $ 242,661 $ (23,013) (9.5) %
Gross profit (loss) 58,458 77,206 (18,748) (24.3) %
Gross profit (loss) as a percentage of revenue 26.6 % 31.8 %
General and administrative expense 20,446 24,852 (4,406) (17.7) %
General and administrative expense as a percentage of revenue 9.3 % 10.2 %
Interest (income) expense, net (596) (666) 70 (10.5) %
Other income, net (16,373) (2,314) (14,059) NM
Income before taxes $ 54,981 $ 55,334 $ (353) (0.6) %
Income before taxes as a percentage of revenue 25.0 % 22.8 %
Revenues for our Completion Fluids & Products Division decreased primarily due to lower Gulf of Mexico and international oil and gas activity and global shipping delays, partially offset by an increase in industrial chemicals product sales. In addition, the prior year period benefited from two large international orders. The ramp down in activity due to the COVID-19 pandemic and associated reduction in oil prices lagged North America onshore, and did not have a significant impact on offshore Gulf of Mexico and international activity until the third and fourth quarters of 2020.
Completion Fluids & Products Division gross profit during 2021 decreased compared to the prior year due to lower revenue and was also negatively impacted by continued inflationary pressures in certain raw materials and higher logistics costs due to the global shipping crisis. Completion Fluids & Products Division profitability in future periods will continue to be affected by the mix of its products and services, market demand for our products and services, drilling and completions activity and commodity prices.
Pretax income for our Completion Fluids & Products Division remained relatively stable during 2021 compared to the prior year primarily due to the decrease in gross profit discussed above being offset by an increase in other income and a decrease in general and administrative expenses. The division had an $11.7 million increase in income from our investment in Standard Lithium compared to the prior year. Additionally, the Completion Fluids & Products Division bad debt expense decreased $4.1 million due to several bankruptcy-related reserves recorded in the prior year and foreign exchange fluctuations were favorable by $2.0 million.
Water & Flowback Services Division
Year Ended
December 31, Period to Period Change
2021 2020 2021 vs. 2020 % Change
(In Thousands, Except Percentages)
Revenues $ 168,624 $ 135,054 $ 33,570 24.9 %
Gross profit 1,800 (8,856) 10,656 120.3 %
Gross profit as a percentage of revenue 1.1 % (6.6) %
General and administrative expense 14,613 15,644 (1,031) (6.6) %
General and administrative expense as a percentage of revenue 8.7 % 11.6 %
Interest (income) expense, net (511) (1,135) 624 (55.0) %
Other income, net (1,186) (1,515) 329 (21.7) %
Loss before taxes $ (11,116) $ (21,850) $ 10,734 (49.1) %
Loss before taxes as a percentage of revenue (6.6) % (16.2) %
Water & Flowback Services Division revenues increased during 2021 compared to the prior year primarily due to increased customer drilling and completion activity in certain onshore North America markets as the industry continues to recover from the COVID-19 pandemic. Revenues for the prior year were significantly impacted by industry-wide reductions in rig and frac count resulting from historically low oil prices. The current year was negatively impacted by severe weather that caused extended shut downs in certain locations during the first quarter.
The Water & Flowback Services Division reflected a gross profit during 2021 compared to a gross loss in the prior year primarily due to increased revenues as described above and pricing improvements offsetting ongoing inflationary pressures.
The Water & Flowback Services Division reported a lower pretax loss compared to the prior year, primarily due to the gross profit improvement described above. General and administrative expenses also decreased primarily due to a $2.0 million decrease in bad debt expense, partially offset by a $0.9 million increase in consulting and legal services.
Corporate Overhead
Year Ended
December 31, Period to Period Change
2021 2020 2021 vs. 2020 % Change
(In Thousands, Except Percentages)
Depreciation and amortization $ 1,032 $ 818 $ 214 26.2 %
General and administrative expense 39,990 36,201 3,789 10.5 %
Interest expense, net 17,483 20,727 (3,244) (15.7) %
Other (income) expense, net 93 836 (743) (88.9) %
Loss before taxes $ (58,598) $ (58,582) $ (16) - %
Corporate Overhead pretax loss remained stable during 2021 compared to the prior year primarily due to increased general and administrative expense, offset by decreased interest expense. Corporate general and administrative expense increased primarily due to increased salary related expense of $2.0 million, $1.0 million of increased general expenses and $0.8 million of increased professional fees. Interest expense decreased primarily due to $50.5 million of repayments on our term credit facility during the current year. The warrants issued in 2016 expired in December 2021.
Non-GAAP Financial Measures
We use U.S. GAAP financial measures such as revenues, gross profit, income (loss) before taxes, and net cash provided by operating activities, as well as certain non-GAAP financial measures, including Adjusted EBITDA, as performance measures for our business.
Adjusted EBITDA. We view Adjusted EBITDA as one of our primary management tools, and we track it on a monthly basis, both in dollars and as a percentage of revenues (typically compared to the prior month, prior year period, and to budget). We define Adjusted EBITDA as earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization, impairments and certain non-cash charges and non-recurring adjustments.
Adjusted EBITDA is used as a supplemental financial measure by our management to:
•evaluate the financial performance of our assets without regard to financing methods, capital structure, or historical cost basis; and
•determine our ability to incur and service debt and fund capital expenditures.
Adjusted EBITDA is a financial measure that is not in accordance with U.S. GAAP and should not be considered an alternative to net income, operating income, cash flows from operating activities, or any other measure of financial performance presented in accordance with U.S. GAAP. This measure may not be comparable to similarly titled financial metrics of other entities, as other entities may not calculate Adjusted EBITDA in the same manner as we do. Management compensates for the limitations of Adjusted EBITDA as analytical tools by reviewing
the comparable U.S. GAAP measures, understanding the differences between the measures, and incorporating this knowledge into management’s decision-making processes.
The following table reconciles net income (loss) to Adjusted EBITDA for the periods indicated:
Year Ended
December 31, 2021
Completion Fluids & Products Water & Flowback Services Corporate SG&A Other and Eliminations Total
(In Thousands, Except Percents)
Revenue $ 219,648 $ 168,624 $ - $ - $ 388,272
Net income (loss) before taxes and discontinued operations 54,981 (11,116) (39,990) (18,596) (14,721)
Adjustment to long-term incentives - - 4,675 - 4,675
Transaction and other expenses 322 878 2,419 - 3,619
Restructuring 1,209 840 - - 2,049
Stock warrant fair value adjustment - - - (198) (198)
Former CEO stock appreciation right expense - - 865 - 865
Impairments and other charges - - - 132 132
Allowance for bad debt - (230) - - (230)
Adjusted income (loss) before taxes and discontinued operations $ 56,512 $ (9,628) $ (32,031) $ (18,662) $ (3,809)
Adjusted interest expense, net (595) (512) - 17,483 16,376
Adjusted depreciation and amortization 6,885 25,045 - 889 32,819
Equity compensation expense - - 4,664 - 4,664
Adjusted EBITDA $ 62,802 $ 14,905 $ (27,367) $ (290) $ 50,050
Adjusted EBITDA as % of revenue 28.6 % 8.8 % 12.9 %
Year Ended
December 31, 2020
Completion Fluids & Products Water & Flowback Services Corporate SG&A Other and Eliminations Total
(In Thousands, Except Percents)
Revenue $ 242,661 $ 135,054 $ - $ - $ 377,715
Net income (loss) before taxes and discontinued operations 55,334 (21,850) (36,201) (22,369) $ (25,086)
Severance 1,166 1,853 1,555 - 4,574
Transaction and other expenses (90) 124 1,009 - 1,043
Restructuring and severance expenses 1,267 861 - - 2,128
Stock warrant fair value adjustment - - - (251) (251)
Impairments and other charges 108 - - 98 206
Allowance for bad debt 3,919 1,122 - - 5,041
Adjusted income (loss) before taxes and discontinued operations $ 61,704 $ (17,890) $ (33,637) $ (22,522) $ (12,345)
Adjusted interest expense, net (853) (1,594) - 20,727 18,280
Adjusted depreciation and amortization 7,389 30,384 - 708 38,481
Equity compensation expense - - 4,721 - 4,721
Adjusted EBITDA $ 68,240 $ 10,900 $ (28,916) $ (1,087) $ 49,137
Adjusted EBITDA as % of revenue 28.1 % 8.1 % 13.0 %
Year Ended
December 31, 2019
Completion Fluids & Products Water & Flowback Services Corporate SG&A Other and Eliminations Total
(In Thousands, Except Percents)
Revenue $ 279,255 $ 281,986 $ - $ - $ 561,241
Net income (loss) before taxes and discontinued operations (33,969) (21,173) (51,466) (21,501) (128,109)
Severance - - 1,511 - 1,511
Transaction and other expenses (543) - 574 (351) (320)
Restructuring and severance expenses 77 759 - - 836
Stock warrant fair value adjustment - - - (1,624) (1,624)
Impairments and other charges 91,606 24,784 - - 116,390
Former CEO stock appreciation right expense - - - 504 504
Allowance for bad debt - 76 - - 76
Adjusted income (loss) before taxes and discontinued operations $ 57,171 $ 4,446 $ (49,381) $ (22,972) $ (10,736)
Adjusted interest expense, net (720) (1) - 21,473 20,752
Adjusted depreciation and amortization 13,518 33,424 - 621 47,563
Equity compensation expense - - 7,064 - 7,064
Adjusted EBITDA $ 69,969 $ 37,869 $ (42,317) $ (878) $ 64,643
Adjusted EBITDA as % of revenue 25.1 % 13.4 % 11.5 %
Liquidity and Capital Resources
We believe that our capital structure allows us to meet our financial obligations despite current uncertain operating conditions and financial markets. Our liquidity at the end of the fourth quarter was $67.7 million consisting of $31.6 million of unrestricted cash plus $36.1 million of availability under the ABL Credit Agreement. Liquidity is defined as unrestricted cash plus availability under the revolving credit facility.
Our consolidated sources and uses of cash, including cash activity from our former Compression Division, for the years ended December 31, 2021 (which represents January 2021 prior to the closing of the GP sale), 2020 and 2019 are as follows:
Year Ended December 31,
2021 2020 2019
(In Thousands)
Operating activities $ 4,657 $ 76,912 $ 90,232
Investing activities (5,175) 6,038 (106,442)
Financing activities (50,054) (17,629) (5,925)
Consolidated cash flows provided by operating activities totaled $4.7 million during 2021 compared to $76.9 million during the prior year, a decrease of $72.3 million, and compared to $90.2 million during the year ended December 31, 2019. Operating cash flows decreased due to including the results of CSI Compressco for one month during the current year compared to twelve months during the prior years. CSI Compressco generated $0.9 million, $20.8 million and $67.7 million of our consolidated cash flows provided by operating activities during the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019, respectively. Excluding the activities of CSI Compressco, cash flow from operations decreased $52.4 million compared to the prior year primarily due to lower consolidated margins from the change in product mix and working capital changes. We continue to monitor customer credit risk in the current environment and focus on serving larger capitalized oil and gas operators and national oil companies.
Investing Activities
Total cash capital expenditures during 2021 were $20.5 million. Our Water & Flowback Services Division spent $13.6 million on capital expenditures, primarily to maintain, automate and upgrade its water management and flowback equipment fleet. Our Completion Fluids & Products Division spent $3.8 million on capital expenditures during 2021, the majority of which related to plant and facility additions. Capital expenditures also include $3.0 million from our former Compression Division during January 2021.
Investing activities for 2021 also included $17.6 million of proceeds from sale of our shares of Standard Lithium during October and November of 2021, offset by $5.0 million from our investment in a convertible note issued by CarbonFree in December 2021.
As a result of CSI Compressco’s and TETRA’s equipment sales, 2020 cash proceeds from the sale of used equipment exceeded the cash outflows to purchase new equipment. During the year ended December 31, 2020, cash provided by investing activities included $5.2 million from CSI Compressco, primarily consisting of $19.4 million in proceeds from sales of compressors and facilities, offset by $14.7 million of capital expenditures. During 2020, CSI Compressco launched an initiative to rationalize its fleet by selling smaller and mid-sized equipment to focus on the larger-horsepower fleet as well as to sell equipment outside its core area of focus. One of CSI Compressco’s larger customers purchased a small number of large units recently deployed. Additionally during 2020, CSI Compressco sold its Midland fabrication facility and real estate for $17.0 million. Investing cash flows for 2020 also include $14.2 million from TETRA’s sale of 15 high horse power compressor units during the fourth quarter.
During the year ended December 31, 2019, cash used in investing activities included $64.2 million from CSI Compressco, primarily consisting of $75.8 million of capital expenditures. Investing cash flows for 2019 also include proceeds of $12.9 million from our former Compression Division related to the sale of property, plant and equipment primarily the result of a sale-leaseback transaction in which CSI Compressco sold ten compression units and immediately leased them back at a monthly rate.
In August 2021, we announced the completion of a preliminary technical assessment by an independent geological consulting firm, APEX Geoscience Ltd. to assess lithium and bromine exploration targets in our approximately 31,100 net acres of brine leases in the Smackover Formation in Southwest Arkansas. We have rights to the brine, including rights to the bromine and lithium contained in the brine underlying this acreage, pursuant to certain brine leases and brine deeds with various landowners. With respect to approximately 27,500 acres of that total acreage, we have granted Standard Lithium an option to acquire lithium rights. While we continue to evaluate the next steps regarding the potential development of our brine leases, we have only recently started to conduct exploration work on the leases, and we are not currently able to determine the economic viability of the extraction of the lithium and bromine from the leased acreage. As of February 25, 2022, we are in the process of drilling an exploratory brine well on our dedicated acreage in the Smackover Formation in Arkansas. The results of the well, which is expected to be completed in the first quarter of 2022, are expected to advance our exploratory target lithium and bromine assets to more refined resources targets. In addition, the extraction of lithium and bromine from these brine leases will likely require a significant amount of time and capital, which we are not able to estimate at this time.
Historically, a significant majority of our planned capital expenditures have been related to identified opportunities to grow and expand our existing businesses. We are also focused on enhancing shareholder value by capitalizing on our key mineral assets, brine mineral extraction expertise, and deep chemistry competency to expand our offerings into the low carbon energy markets. However, we continue to review all capital expenditure plans carefully in an effort to conserve cash. We currently have no long-term capital expenditure commitments. If the forecasted demand for our products and services increases or decreases, the amount of planned expenditures on growth and expansion may be adjusted.
Financing Activities
During the year ended December 31, 2021, consolidated net cash used in financing activities was $50.1 million, primarily related to the $50.5 million pay down of our Term Credit Agreement. During the year ended December 31, 2020, consolidated net cash used in financing activities was $17.6 million, primarily related to the $8.0 million pay downs of our Term Credit Agreement and our ABL Credit Agreement and $5.0 million cash fees related to CSI Compressco’s exchange of debt. During the year ended December 31, 2019, consolidated net cash used in financing activities was $5.9 million primarily due to $28.0 million of net cash redemptions of the CSI Compressco Preferred Units, offset by $21.5 million of borrowings under our Term Credit Agreement and our ABL Credit Agreement. We may supplement our existing cash balances and cash flow from operating activities with short-term borrowings, long-term borrowings, issuances of equity and debt securities, and other sources of capital. We are aggressively managing our working capital and capital expenditure needs in order to maximize our liquidity in the current environment.
Asset-Based Credit Agreement. The amended ABL Credit Agreement provides for a senior secured revolving credit facility of up to $80 million, with a $20.0 million accordion. The credit facility is subject to a borrowing base to be determined by reference to the value of inventory and accounts receivable, and includes a sublimit of $20.0 million for letters of credit, a swingline loan sublimit of $11.5 million, and a $15.0 million sub-facility subject to a borrowing base consisting of certain trade receivables and inventory in the United Kingdom. The ABL Credit Agreement may be used for working capital needs, capital expenditures and other general corporate purposes. The amounts we may borrow under the ABL Credit Agreement are derived from our accounts receivable, certain accrued receivables and certain inventory. Changes in demand for our products and services have an impact on our eligible accounts receivable, accrued receivables and the value of our inventory, which could result in significant changes to our borrowing base and therefore our availability under our ABL Credit Agreement. The ABL Credit Agreement is scheduled to mature on May 31, 2025. As of December 31, 2021, we had $1.6 million outstanding under the ABL Credit Agreement and, subject to compliance with the covenants, borrowing base, and other provisions of the agreement that may limit borrowings, we had an availability of $36.1 million under the ABL Credit Agreement. As of February 25, 2022, we have $0.8 million of outstanding borrowings under our ABL Credit Agreement and $6.0 million letters of credit, resulting in $51.8 million of availability.
Term Credit Agreement. The Term Credit Agreement is scheduled to mature on September 10, 2025. Our Term Credit Agreement requires us to annually prepay up to 50% of Excess Cash Flow (as defined in the Term Credit Agreement) from the most recent full fiscal year. If our Leverage Ratio (as defined in the Term Credit Agreement) at year-end is less than 2.00 to 1.00, the prepayment requirement is decreased to 25%. If our Leverage Ratio at year-end is less than 1.50 to 1.00, then no prepayment is required. As of February 25, 2022, $163.1 million in aggregate principal amount of our Term Credit Agreement is outstanding.
During the first quarter of 2021, we used proceeds from the GP sale and available cash on hand, including $14.2 million of proceeds from the fourth quarter 2020 compressor unit sales to Spartan, to pay down $29.3 million on our term loan. We repaid an additional $8.2 million of our term loan in July 2021 and $13.0 million of our term loan in December 2021.
As of December 31, 2021, we are in compliance with all covenants of our debt agreements. See Note 10 - “Long-Term Debt and Other Borrowings” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further information.
Swedish Credit Facility. In January 2022, the Company entered into a new revolving credit facility for seasonal working capital needs of subsidiaries in Sweden and Finland (“Swedish Credit Facility”). There are no borrowings and the facility has availability of 50.0 million Swedish Krona, or approximately $5.3 million United States dollars, as of February 25, 2022. During each year, all outstanding loans under the Swedish Credit Facility must be repaid for at least 30 consecutive days. Borrowings bear interest at a rate of 2.95% per annum. The Swedish Credit Facility expires on December 31, 2022 and the Company intends to renew it annually.
Other Sources and Uses of Cash
In addition to the aforementioned credit facilities and senior notes, we fund our short-term liquidity requirements from cash generated by our operations and from short-term vendor financing. In addition, as of December 31, 2021, the market value of our equity holdings of CSI Compressco was $6.2 million, with no holding restrictions on our ability to monetize our investment. Should additional capital be required, the ability to raise such capital through the issuance of additional debt or equity securities may currently be limited. Instability or volatility in the capital markets at the times we need to access capital may affect the cost of capital and the ability to raise capital for an indeterminable length of time. If it is necessary to issue additional equity to fund our capital needs, additional dilution of our common stockholders will occur. We periodically evaluate engaging in strategic transactions and may consider divesting non-core assets where our evaluation suggests such transaction is in the best interest of our business. In challenging economic environments, we may experience increased delays and failures by customers to pay our invoices. Given the nature and significance of the COVID-19 pandemic and disruption in the oil and gas industry, we could experience delayed customer payments and payment defaults associated with customer liquidity issues and bankruptcies. If our customers delay paying or fail to pay us a significant amount of our outstanding receivables, it could have an adverse effect on our liquidity. An increase of unpaid receivables would also negatively affect our borrowing availability under the ABL Credit Agreement.
On April 11, 2019, we filed a universal shelf Registration Statement on Form S-3 with the SEC. On May 1, 2019, the Registration Statement on Form S-3 was declared effective by the SEC. Pursuant to this registration statement, we have the ability to sell debt or equity securities in one or more public offerings up to an aggregate public offering price of $400 million. This shelf registration statement currently provides us additional flexibility with regard to potential financings that we may undertake when market conditions permit or our financial condition may require. We intend to renew the shelf Registration Statement during the second quarter of 2022.
Leases
We have operating leases for some of our transportation equipment, office space, warehouse space, operating locations, and machinery and equipment. Our leases have remaining lease terms ranging from 1 to 13 years. See Note 2 - “Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further information our lease obligations.
Asset Retirement Obligations
We operate facilities in various U.S. and foreign locations that are used in the manufacture, storage, and sale of our products, inventories, and equipment. We are required to take certain actions in connection with the retirement of these assets.
Product Purchase Obligations
In the normal course of our Completion Fluids & Products Division operations, we enter into supply agreements with certain manufacturers of various raw materials and finished products. Some of these agreements have terms and conditions that specify a minimum or maximum level of purchases over the term of the agreement. Other agreements require us to purchase the entire output of the raw material or finished product produced by the manufacturer. Our purchase obligations under these agreements apply only with regard to raw materials and finished products that meet specifications set forth in the agreements. We recognize a liability for the purchase of such products at the time we receive them. As of December 31, 2021, the aggregate amount of the fixed and determinable portion of the purchase obligation pursuant to our Completion Fluids & Products Division’s supply agreements was approximately $114.5 million, extending through 2029, including commitments on average of $15.3 million per year from 2021 through 2026.
Off Balance Sheet Arrangements
As of December 31, 2021, we do not have any off balance sheet arrangements that may have a current or future material effect on our consolidated financial condition or results of operations.
Litigation
For information regarding litigation, including contingencies of discontinued operations, see Note 11 - “Commitments and Contingencies” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
This discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations is based upon our consolidated financial statements. We prepared these financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP. In preparing our consolidated financial statements, we make assumptions, estimates, and judgments that affect the amounts reported. We base these on historical experience, available information, and various other assumptions that we believe are reasonable. Our assumptions, estimates, and judgments may change as new events occur, as new information is acquired, and as changes in our operating environments are encountered. Actual results are likely to differ from our current estimates, and those differences may be material. The following critical accounting policies reflect the most significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our financial statements.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
The determination of impairment of long-lived assets, including identified intangible assets, is conducted periodically whenever indicators of impairment are present. If such indicators are present, the determination of the amount of impairment is based on our judgments as to the future operating cash flows to be generated from these assets throughout their estimated useful lives. If an impairment of a long-lived asset is warranted, we estimate the fair value of the asset based on a present value of these cash flows or the value that could be realized from disposing of the asset in a transaction between market participants. The oil and gas industry is cyclical, and our estimates of the amount of future cash flows, the period over which these estimated future cash flows will be generated, as well as the fair value of an impaired asset, are imprecise. Our failure to accurately estimate these future operating cash flows or fair values could result in certain long-lived assets being overstated, which could result in impairment charges in periods subsequent to the time in which the impairment indicators were first present. Alternatively, if our estimates of future operating cash flows or fair values are understated, impairments might be recognized unnecessarily or in excess of the appropriate amounts.
Impairment of Goodwill
During the third quarter of 2019, we determined that the deteriorating energy industry outlook was an indicator requiring further analysis for impairment of goodwill. We determined at that time that the fair value of the Water Management reporting unit, the only reporting unit with goodwill, exceeded its carrying value and there was no impairment to goodwill.
During the fourth quarter of 2019, due to further deterioration in the energy industry outlook resulting in decreased expected future cash flows for our Water Management reporting unit, a component of our Water & Flowback Services Division, we recorded a full goodwill impairment of $25.9 million. As a result, there was no goodwill balance as of December 31, 2021 or 2020.

---

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.
Interest Rate Risk
The interest on our borrowings is subject to market risk exposure related to changes in applicable interest rates. Borrowings under our revolving credit facility bear interest at an agreed-upon percentage rate spread above LIBOR. Borrowings under the Term Credit Agreement bear interest at a rate per annum equal to, at the option of TETRA, either (i) LIBOR (subject to a 1% floor) plus a margin of 6.25% per annum or (ii) a base rate plus a margin of 5.25% per annum. The following table sets forth as of December 31, 2021, the principal amount due under our long-term debt obligations and their respective weighted average interest rates. We are not a party to an interest rate swap contract or other derivative instrument designed to hedge our exposure to interest rate fluctuation risk.
Interest December 31,
Scheduled Maturity Rate 2021
(In Thousands)
Asset-based credit agreement May 31, 2025 4.75% $ 1,614
Term credit agreement September 10, 2025 7.25% 163,071
Total long-term debt $ 164,685
Exchange Rate Risk
We are exposed to fluctuations between the U.S. dollar and the euro with regard to our euro-denominated operating activities. We also have currency exchange rate risk exposure related to revenues, expenses, operating receivables, and payables denominated in foreign currencies. We may enter into 30-day foreign-currency forward derivative contracts as part of a program designed to mitigate the currency exchange rate risk exposure on selected transactions of certain foreign subsidiaries. Although contracts pursuant to this program will serve as an economic hedge of the cash flow of our currency exchange risk exposure, they are not expected to be formally designated as hedge contracts or qualify for hedge accounting treatment. Accordingly, any change in the fair value of these derivative instruments during a period will be included in the determination of earnings for that period. As of December 31, 2021, we did not have any foreign currency exchange contracts outstanding.

---

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.
The financial statements and supplementary data required to be included in this Item 8 are set forth in Item 15 of this Annual Report.

---

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.
None.

---

ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures.
Conclusion Regarding the Effectiveness of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we conducted an evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as such term is defined under Rule 13a-15(e) promulgated under the Exchange Act as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of December 31, 2021.
Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f). Our Internal control over financial reporting is a process to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of our financial reporting for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Our internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of our
assets; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of our management and directors; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. In addition, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Under the supervision and with the participation of management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2021 was conducted based on the framework in Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) (“COSO”). Based on this assessment, management has determined that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2021.
Grant Thornton LLP, our independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2021. Grant Thornton LLP’s report on our internal control over financial reporting is included herein.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the fourth quarter of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

---

ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 9B. Other Information.
None.

---

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers, and Corporate Governance.
The information required by this Item is hereby incorporated by reference from the information appearing under the captions “Proposal No. 1: Election of Directors,” “Executive Officers,” “Corporate Governance,” “Board Meetings and Committees,” in our definitive proxy statement (the “Proxy Statement”) for the annual meeting of stockholders to be held on May 24, 2022, which involves the election of directors and is to be filed with the SEC pursuant to the Exchange Act within 120 days of the end of our fiscal year on December 31, 2021.

---

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Item 11. Executive Compensation.
The information required by this Item is hereby incorporated by reference from the information appearing under the captions “Management and Compensation Committee Report,” “Management and Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation,” “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” “Compensation of Executive Officers,” and “Director Compensation” in our Proxy Statement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, in accordance with the instructions to Item 407 of Regulation S-K, the information contained in our Proxy Statement under the subheading “Compensation Committee Report” shall be deemed furnished, and not filed, in this Form 10-K, and shall not be deemed incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act, or the Exchange Act, as a result of this furnishing, except to the extent we specifically incorporate it by reference.

---

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.
The information required by this Item is hereby incorporated by reference from the information appearing under the captions “Beneficial Stock Ownership of Certain Stockholders and Management” and “Equity Compensation Plan Information” in our Proxy Statement.

---

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.
The information required by this Item is hereby incorporated by reference from the information appearing under the captions “Certain Transactions” and “Director Independence” in our Proxy Statement.

---

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES
Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services.
The information required by this Item is hereby incorporated by reference from the information appearing under the caption “Fees Paid to Principal Accounting Firm” in our Proxy Statement.
PART IV

---

ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules.
(a) List of documents filed as part of this Report
1. Financial Statements of the Company
Page
Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firms (PCAOB ID Numbers Grant Thornton LLP: 248 & Ernst & Young LLP: 42)
Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2021 and 2020
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020, and 2019
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020, and 2019
Consolidated Statements of Equity for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020, and 2019
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020, and 2019
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
2. Financial statement schedules
All other schedules for which provision is made in the applicable accounting regulation of the Securities and Exchange Commission are not required under the related instructions or are inapplicable and therefore have been omitted.
3. List of Exhibits
2.1+++ Asset Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated February 28, 2018, by and between Maritech Resources, LLC, TETRA Technologies, Inc., and Orinoco Natural Resources, LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report filed on May 10, 2018 (SEC File No. 001-13455)).
2.2+++ Equity Interest Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated February 28, 2018, by and among TETRA Technologies, Inc., TETRA Production Testing Holding LLC, and Epic Offshore Specialty, LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.2 to the Company’s Quarterly Report filed on May 10, 2018 (SEC File No. 001-13455)).
2.3+++ Equity Interest Purchase Agreement, dated February 13, 2018, by and among the sellers listed therein, the sellers representative and TETRA Technologies, Inc (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.3 to the Company’s Quarterly Report filed on May 10, 2018 (SEC File No. 001-13455)).
2.4+++ Membership Interest Purchase And Sale Agreement, dated as of February 28, 2018, by and among TETRA Applied Technologies, LLC, Maritech Resources, LLC, TETRA Technologies, Inc., and Orinoco Natural Resources, LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.4 to the Company’s Quarterly Report filed on May 10, 2018 (SEC File No. 001-13455)).
2.5+++
Purchase and Sale Agreement dated as of January 29, 2021 between Spartan Energy Holdco, LLC, TETRA Technologies, Inc., and, solely for the limited purposes set forth therein, Spartan Energy Partners LP (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Company's Form 8-K filed on January 29, 2021 (SEC File No. 001-13455)).
3.1 Restated Certificate of Incorporation of TETRA Technologies, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed on December 22, 2016 (SEC File No. 333-215283)).
3.2 Amended and Restated Bylaws of TETRA Technologies, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.6 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed on May 4, 2006 (SEC File No. 333-133790)).
3.3 Certificate of Amendment of Restated Certificate of Incorporation of TETRA Technologies, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company's Quarterly Report filed on August 9, 2017 (SEC File No. 001-13455)).
4.1 Form of Senior Indenture (including form of senior debt security) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.10 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-3 filed on April 12, 2019 (SEC File No. 333-230818)).
4.2 Form of Subordinated Indenture (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.11 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-3 filed on April 12, 2019 (SEC File No. 333-230818)).
4.3 Credit Agreement, date September 10, 2018, among TETRA Technologies, Inc. and JPMorgan Chase Bank (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Form 8-K filed on September 13, 2018 (SEC File No. 001-13455)).
4.4 Credit Agreement, date September 10, 2018, among TETRA Technologies, Inc. and Wilmington Trust, National Association (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company's Form 8-K filed on September 13, 2018 (SEC File No. 001-13455)).
4.5 Intercreditor Agreement, date September 10, 2018, among TETRA Technologies, Inc., JPMorgan Chase Bank, and Wilmington Trust, National Association (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Form 8-K filed on September 13, 2018 (SEC File No. 001-13455)).
4.6 Term Loan Letter Agreement, dated March 29, 2021, amending Credit Agreement, dated September 10, 2018, among the Company and Wilmington Trust, National Association (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report filed on May 5, 2021 (SEC File No. 001-13455)).
4.7 Second Amendment to the Credit Agreement dated as of July 30, 2021, by and among the Company, certain subsidiaries of TETRA party thereto, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as administrative agent, and each of the lenders and issuing banks party thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed on August 2, 2021 (SEC File No. 001-13455)).
4.8 Amendment to Credit Agreement dated as of July 30, 2021, by and among the Company, Wilmington Trust, National Association, as administrative agent, and each of the lenders party thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed on August 2, 2021 (SEC File No. 001-13455)).
4.9 Description of the Registrant's Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
10.1*** TETRA Technologies, Inc. Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to the Company’s Form 10-Q filed on August 13, 2002 (SEC File No. 001-13455)).
10.2*** TETRA Technologies, Inc. Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan and The Executive Excess Plan Adoption Agreement effective on June 30, 2005 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Form 10-Q/A filed on March 16, 2006 (SEC File No. 001-13455)).
10.3*** TETRA Technologies, Inc. 401(k) Retirement Plan, as amended and restated (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed on February 22, 2008 (SEC File No. 333-149348)).
10.4*** TETRA Technologies, Inc. 2007 Equity Incentive Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.12 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed on May 4, 2007 (SEC File No. 333-142637)).
10.5*** TETRA Technologies, Inc. Amended and Restated 2007 Equity Incentive Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.12 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed on May 9, 2008 (SEC File No. 333-150783)).
10.6*** TETRA Technologies, Inc. 2007 Long Term Incentive Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.11 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed on May 5, 2010 (SEC File No. 333-166537)).
10.7*** TETRA Technologies, Inc. Amended and Restated 2007 Long Term Incentive Compensation Plan, as amended through February 20, 2015 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company's Form 10-Q filed on August 10, 2015 (SEC File No. 001-13455)).
10.8*** TETRA Technologies, Inc. 2011 Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.11 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed on May 10, 2011 (SEC File No. 333-174090)).
10.9*** TETRA Technologies, Inc. 2011 Amended and Restated Long Term Incentive Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.9 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed on May 9, 2013 (SEC File No. 333-188494)).
10.10*** TETRA Technologies, Inc. Second Amended and Restated 2011 Long Term Incentive Compensation Plan, as amended through February 20, 2015 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Company's Form 10-Q filed on August 10, 2015 (SEC File No. 001-13455)).
10.11*** Third Amended and Restated 2011 Long Term Incentive Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Form 8-K filed on May 6, 2016 (SEC File No. 001-13455)).
10.12*** Employee Equity Award Agreement dated August 15, 2012 by and between TETRA Technologies, Inc. and Elijio V. Serrano (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed on August 16, 2012 (SEC File No. 001-13455)).
10.13 Lease Agreement dated December 31, 2012 by and between Tetris Property LP and TETRA Technologies, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.36 to the Company's Form 10-K filed on March 4, 2013 (SEC File No. 001-13455)).
10.14 Bonding Agreement, dated February 28, 2018, between TETRA Technologies, Inc., Orinoco Natural Resources, LLC, and Epic Offshore Specialty, LLC.
10.15*** Form of Change in Control Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.21 to the Company’s Form 10-K filed on March 16, 2020 (SEC File No. 001-13455)).
10.16*** TETRA Technologies, Inc. Cash Incentive Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Form 10-Q filed on May 10, 2010 (SEC File No. 001-13455)).
10.17*** Amendment No. 2 to the TETRA Technologies, Inc. Cash Incentive Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Form 8-K filed on February 26, 2016 (SEC File No. 001-13455)).
10.18*** Stand-Alone Cash-Settled Stock Appreciation Rights Award Agreement, dated August 9, 2017, between TETRA Technologies, Inc. and Stuart M. Brightman (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Quarterly Report filed on November 9, 2017 (SEC File No. 001-13455)).
10.19*** Stand-Alone Cash-Settled Stock Appreciation Rights Award Agreement, dated February 22, 2018, between TETRA Technologies, Inc. and Stuart M. Brightman (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.44 to the Company’s Form 10-K filed on March 4, 2019 (SEC File No. 001-13455)).
10.20*** TETRA Technologies, Inc. 2018 Inducement Restricted Stock Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.5 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed on February 12, 2018 ((SEC File No. 333-222976)).
10.21*** Form of TETRA Technologies, Inc. 2018 Inducement Restricted Stock Plan Restricted Stock Award Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.6 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed on February 12, 2018 (SEC File No. 333-222976)).
10.22*** Transition Agreement dated as of May 8, 2019 between TETRA Technologies, Inc. and Stuart M. Brightman (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed on May 8, 2019 (SEC File No. 001-13455)).
10.23*** Amendment to Transition Agreement dated April 8, 2020 between TETRA Technologies, Inc. and Stuart M. Brightman (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report filed on August 7, 2020 (SEC File No. 001-13455)).
10.24*** Transition Agreement dated July 27, 2020 between TETRA Technologies, Inc. and Bass C. Wallace, Jr. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report filed on November 3, 2020 (SEC File No. 001-13455)).
10.25*** TETRA Technologies, Inc. 2018 Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.5 to the Company’s registration statement on Form S-8 filed on May 4, 2018 (SEC File No. 333-224679).
10.26*** Form of TETRA Technologies, Inc. 2018 Equity Incentive Plan Restricted Stock Award Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.6 to the Company’s registration statement on Form S-8 filed on May 4, 2018 (SEC File No. 333-224679).
10.27*** Form of TETRA Technologies, Inc. 2018 Equity Incentive Plan Incentive Stock Option Award Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.7 to the Company’s registration statement on Form S-8 filed on May 4, 2018 (SEC File No. 333224679).
10.28*** Form of TETRA Technologies, Inc. 2018 Equity Incentive Plan Nonqualified Stock Option Award Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.8 to the Company’s registration statement on Form S-8 filed on May 4, 2018 (SEC File No. 333-224679).
10.29*** Form of TETRA Technologies, Inc. 2018 Equity Incentive Plan Cash Retention Award Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Quarterly Report filed on November 3, 2020 (SEC File No. 001-13455)).
10.30*** TETRA Technologies, Inc. First Amended and Restated 2018 Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed with the SEC on May 26, 2021 (SEC File No. 333-256494)).
10.31*** Form of TETRA Technologies, Inc. First Amended and Restated 2018 Equity Incentive Plan Restricted Stock Unit Award (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed with the SEC on May 26, 2021 (SEC File No. 333-256494)).
10.32*** Form of TETRA Technologies, Inc. First Amended and Restated 2018 Equity Incentive Plan Restricted Stock Unit Award for Outside Directors (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed with the SEC on May 26, 2021 (SEC File No. 333-256494)).
10.33*** Form of TETRA Technologies, Inc. First Amended and Restated 2018 Equity Incentive Plan Cash Award Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed with the SEC on May 26, 2021 (SEC File No. 333-256494)).
10.34*** Cooperation Agreement, dated March 24, 2021, by and among TETRA Technologies, Inc., Bradley L. Radoff and the Radoff Family Foundation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed on March 26, 2021 (SEC File No. 001-13455).
21+ Subsidiaries of the Company.
23.1+ Consent of Grant Thornton LLP
23.2+ Consent of Ernst & Young LLP
31.1+ Certification Pursuant to Rule 13(a)-14(a) or 15(d)-14(a) of the Exchange Act, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2+ Certification Pursuant to Rule 13(a)-14(a) or 15(d)-14(a) of the Exchange Act, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1** Certification Furnished Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Chief Executive Officer).
32.2** Certification Furnished Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Chief Financial Officer).
101.INS++ XBRL Instance Document.
101.SCH++ XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.
101.CAL++ XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.
101.LAB++ XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.
101.PRE++ XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.
101.DEF++ XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.
104++ Cover Page Interactive Data File (formatted as Inline XBRL and contained in Exhibit 101).
+ Filed with this report
** Furnished with this report.
*** Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.
++ Attached as Exhibit 101 to this report are the following documents formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language): (i) Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019; (ii) Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020; (iii) Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019; (iv) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019; (v) Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019; and (vi) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 2021.
+++ Certain schedules have been omitted pursuant to Item 601(a)(5) of Regulation S-K. The registrant agrees to furnish supplementally a copy of any such omitted schedule to the SEC upon request.