EDGAR 10-K Filing

Company CIK: 98338
Filing Year: 2021
Filename: 98338_10-K_2021_0001213900-21-044375.json

---

ITEM 1. BUSINESS
Item 1. Business
General
TSR, Inc. (the “Company,” “TSR,” “we,” “us” and “our”) is a leading staffing company focused on recruiting Information Technology professionals for short and long term assignments, permanent placements, project work and providing contract computer programming services to its customers. The Company provides its customers with technical computer personnel to supplement their in-house information technology (“IT”) capabilities. The Company’s customers for its contract computer programming services consist primarily of Fortune 1000 companies with significant technology budgets. In the year ended May 31, 2021, the Company provided IT staffing services to 61 customers. Also, beginning in the year ended May 31, 2017, the Company has provided and continues to provide contract administrative (non-IT) workers to some of its significant IT customers, including services to provide administrative workers to new customers acquired following the acquisition of Geneva Consulting Group, Inc. (“Geneva”) on September 1, 2020, as discussed in Note 11 to the Consolidated Financial Statements elsewhere in this report.
The Company was incorporated in Delaware in 1969. The Company’s executive offices are located at 400 Oser Avenue, Suite 150, Hauppauge, NY 11788, and its telephone number is (631) 231-0333. This annual report, and each of our other periodic and current reports, including any amendments, are available, free of charge, on our website, www.tsrconsulting.com, as soon as reasonably practicable after such material is electronically filed with, or furnished to, the Securities and Exchange Commission. The information contained on our website is not incorporated by reference into this annual report on Form 10-K and should not be considered part of this report.
STAFFING SERVICES
The Company’s contract computer programming services involve the provision of technical staff to customers to meet the specialized requirements of their IT operations. The technical personnel provided by the Company generally supplement the in-house capabilities of the Company’s customers. The Company’s approach is to make available to its customers a broad range of technical personnel to meet their requirements rather than focusing on specific specialized areas. The Company has staffing capabilities in the areas of application development in .net and java, mobile applications for Android and IOS platforms, project management, IT security specialists, cloud development and architecture, business analysts, UI design and development, network infrastructure and support and database development and administration. The Company’s services provide customers with flexibility in staffing their day-to-day operations, as well as special projects, on a short-term or long-term basis.
The Company provides technical employees for projects, which usually range from three months to one year. Generally, customers may terminate projects at any time. Staffing services are typically provided at the client’s facility and are billed primarily on an hourly basis based on the actual hours worked by technical personnel provided by the Company and with reimbursement for out-of-pocket expenses. The Company pays its technical personnel on a semi-monthly basis and invoices its customers, not less frequently than monthly.
The Company’s success is dependent upon, among other things, its ability to attract, recruit and retain qualified professional IT personnel. The Company believes that there is significant competition for software professionals with the skills and experience necessary to perform the services offered by the Company. Although the Company generally has been successful in attracting employees with the skills needed to fulfill customer engagements, demand for qualified professionals conversant with certain technologies may outstrip supply as new and additional skills are required to keep pace with evolving computer technology or as competition for technical personnel increases. Increasing demand for qualified personnel could also result in increased expenses to hire and retain qualified technical personnel and could adversely affect the Company’s profit margins.
In the past several years, an increasing number of companies are using or are considering using low cost offshore outsourcing centers, particularly in India, to perform technology related work and projects. This trend has contributed to an industry wide decline in domestic IT staffing revenue in some segments. There can be no assurance that this trend will not continue to adversely impact the Company’s IT staffing revenue.
Beginning in the year ended May 31, 2017, the Company began to provide contract administrative (non-IT) workers to support some of its significant IT customers. This service was added at the customers’ request. The skills required for these positions are normally less demanding and the Company has hired a separate recruiting staff to handle this business, which includes both-in house and off-shore recruiters. There can be no assurance that the customers will continue to request these services.
OPERATIONS
The Company provides contract computer programming services primarily in the New York metropolitan area, New England, and the Mid-Atlantic region, although there are also customer locations around the country where the Company places contractors. The Company provides its services principally through offices located in Edison, New Jersey and Long Island, New York. The Company also leases an office space New York City, but has sublet its New York City office due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Competition from larger competitors for recruiters has created more turnover than expected and increased the cost of retaining recruiters, making it more difficult to increase the number of technical recruiters on staff. As of May 31, 2021, the Company employed 29 persons who are responsible for recruiting technical and non-technical personnel and 13 persons who are account executives. As of May 31, 2020, the Company had employed 24 technical and non-technical recruiters and 9 account executives. For some services, the Company also uses offshore recruiters. The number of offshore recruiters contracted by the Company fluctuates depending on demand for services. At May 31, 2021, the Company contracted for approximately 40 offshore recruiters to provide services to clients.
MARKETING AND CUSTOMERS
The Company focuses its marketing efforts on large businesses and institutions with significant IT budgets and recurring staffing and software development needs. The Company provided services to 61 customers during the year ended May 31, 2021 (“fiscal 2021”) as compared to 56 in the year ended May 31, 2020 (“fiscal 2020”). The Company has historically derived a significant percentage of its total revenue from a relatively small number of customers. In fiscal 2021, the Company had three customers which each provided more than 10% of consolidated revenues: Consolidated Edison (22.4%), Citigroup (19.9%), and AgileOne (11.9%). AgileOne provides vendor management services under an arrangement where the Company enters into a subcontract with AgileOne and AgileOne directly contracts with three end customers. The AgileOne end customers for which the Company provides services include Bristol Myers Squibb, which alone constituted 11.1% of the Company’s consolidated revenue for fiscal 2021. Additionally, the Company’s top ten customers (including underlying customers of vendor management companies) accounted for 81% of consolidated revenue in fiscal 2021 and 83% in fiscal 2020. While continuing its efforts to further expand its client base, including strategically targeted middle market accounts, the Company’s marketing efforts are focused primarily on increasing business from its existing accounts. Approximately 27% of the Company’s revenue is derived from end customers in the financial services business. Competitive pressures in financial services, primarily with European based banks, have negatively affected the net effective rates that the Company charges to certain of the Company’s end customers in this industry, which has negatively affected the Company’s gross profit margins.
Many of the Company’s major customers, totaling over 31% of revenue, have retained a third party to provide vendor management services and centralize the consultant hiring process. Under this system, the third party retains the Company to provide contract computer programming services, the Company bills the third party and the third party bills the ultimate customer. At certain customers, this process has weakened the relationships the Company has built with its customers’ project managers, who are the Company’s primary contacts with its customers and with whom the Company would normally work to place consultants. Instead, the Company is required to interface with the vendor management provider, making it more difficult to maintain its relationships with its customers and preserve and expand its business. In some cases, these changes have also reduced the Company’s profit margins because the vendor management company is retained for the purpose of keeping costs low for the end client and receives a processing fee which is deducted from the payment to the Company.
In accordance with industry practice, most of the Company’s contracts for contract computer programming services are terminable by either the client or the Company on short notice.
PROFESSIONAL STAFF AND RECRUITMENT
In addition to using internet-based job boards such as LinkedIn, Dice, Monster, Career Builder, Biospace and Discover.org, the Company maintains a database of technical personnel with a wide range of skills. The Company uses a sophisticated proprietary computer system to match potential employees’ skills and experience with client requirements. The Company periodically contacts personnel within its database to update their availability, skills, employment interests and other matters and continually updates its database. This database is made available to the account executives and recruiters at each of the Company’s offices.
The Company employs technical personnel primarily on an hourly basis, as required in order to meet the staffing requirements under particular contracts or for particular projects. The Company primarily recruits technical personnel by posting jobs on the Internet and, on occasion, by publishing advertisements in local newspapers and attending job fairs. The Company devotes significant resources to recruiting technical personnel, maintaining 29 technical recruiters based in the U.S. and contracting with companies for up to 40 offshore recruiters as needed to assist in locating both IT and administrative (non-IT) workers. Potential applicants are generally interviewed and tested by the Company’s recruiting personnel, by third parties that have the required technical backgrounds to review the qualifications of the applicants, or by on-line testing services. In some cases, instead of employing technical personnel directly, the Company uses subcontractors who employ the technical personnel who are provided to the Company’s customers. For a small fee, the Company may sometimes process payments on behalf of customers to contractors identified by the customers directly instead of through the normal recruiting process; this is known as “payrolling”.
Competition
The technical staffing industry is highly competitive and fragmented and has low barriers to entry. The Company competes for potential customers with providers of outsourcing services, systems integrators, computer systems consultants, other providers of technical staffing services and, to a lesser extent, temporary personnel agencies. Many of the Company’s competitors are significantly larger and have greater financial resources than the Company. The Company believes that the principal competitive factors in obtaining and retaining customers are accurate assessment of customers’ requirements, timely assignment of technical employees with appropriate skills and the price of services. The principal competitive factors in attracting qualified technical personnel are compensation, availability, quality and variety of projects and schedule flexibility. The Company believes that many of the technical personnel included in its database may also be pursuing other employment opportunities. Therefore, the Company believes that its responsiveness to the needs of technical personnel is an important factor in the Company’s ability to fill projects. Although the Company believes it competes favorably with respect to these factors, it expects competition to increase and there can be no assurance that the Company will remain competitive.
Intellectual Property Rights
The Company relies primarily upon a combination of trade secret, nondisclosure and other contractual arrangements to protect its proprietary rights. The Company generally enters into confidentiality agreements with its employees, consultants, customers and potential customers and limits access to and distribution of its proprietary information. There can be no assurance that the steps taken by the Company in this regard will be adequate to deter misappropriation of its proprietary information or that the Company will be able to detect unauthorized use and take appropriate steps to enforce its intellectual property rights.
Personnel
As of May 31, 2021, the Company had 606 full-time employees including its 2 executive officers. Of such employees, 13 were engaged in sales, 29 were recruiters for technical and non-technical personnel, 547 were IT and administrative (non-IT) contractors, and 15 were engaged in corporate administrative and clerical functions.
As of May 31, 2020, the Company had 338 full-time employees including its 2 executive officers. Of such employees, 9 were engaged in sales, 24 were recruiters for technical and non-technical personnel, 292 were IT and administrative (non-IT) contractors, and 11 were engaged in corporate administrative and clerical functions.
None of the Company’s employees belong to unions.
Forward-Looking Statements
Certain statements contained under this Item 1A. “Risk Factors”, Item 7. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and Item 1. “Business”, including but not limited to statements concerning the Company’s future prospects and the Company’s future cash flow requirements are forward-looking statements, as defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The words “believe,” “may,” “will,” “estimate,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “expect,” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Actual results may differ materially from those projections in the forward-looking statements, which statements involve risks and uncertainties, including but not limited to the factors set forth below
● the statements concerning the success of the Company’s plan for growth, both internally and through the previously announced pursuit of suitable acquisition candidates;
● the successful integration of announced and completed acquisitions and any anticipated benefits therefrom;
● the impact of adverse economic conditions on client spending, which include, but are not limited to, the current adverse economic conditions associated with the COVID-19 global health pandemic and the associated financial crisis, stay-at-home and other orders, which may significantly reduce client spending and which may have a negative impact on the Company’s business;
● risks relating to the competitive nature of the markets for contract computer programming services;
● the extent to which market conditions for the Company’s contract computer programming services will continue to adversely affect the Company’s business;
● the concentration of the Company’s business with certain customers;
● uncertainty as to the Company’s ability to maintain its relations with existing customers and expand its business;
● the impact of changes in the industry, such as the use of vendor management companies in connection with the consultant procurement process;
● the increase in customers moving IT operations offshore;
● the Company’s ability to adapt to changing market conditions;
● the risks, uncertainties and expense of the legal proceedings to which the Company is, or may become, a party; and
● other risks and uncertainties set forth in the Company’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Forward-looking statements reflect our current views with respect to future events and are based on currently available operating, financial and competitive information. We have no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or risks, except to the extent required by applicable law. If we do update one or more forward-looking statements, no inference should be drawn that we will make additional updates with respect to those or other forward-looking statements. New information, future events or risks could cause the forward-looking events we discuss in this report not to occur. You should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which reflect our expectations only as of the date of this report.

---

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
Item 1A. Risk Factors
Our business, financial condition and results of operations have been and may continue to be negatively impacted by global health epidemics, including the recent COVID-19 outbreak.
Outbreaks of epidemic, pandemic, or contagious diseases such as COVID-19 have and may continue to have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations. The spread of COVID-19 across the world has resulted in the World Health Organization declaring the outbreak of COVID-19 as a global pandemic. As the extent and duration of the COVID-19 outbreak is still unknown, international stock markets have experienced volatility reflecting the uncertainty associated with the slow-down in the global economy and the resulting governmental responses to the pandemic. If COVID-19 continues to progress in ways that disrupt our customers’ demand for computer programing services or staffing needs or otherwise continues to disrupt our operations, such disruptions may continue to negatively affect, and may in the future materially affect, our operating results. The majority of our workforce and customer base is located in New Jersey and New York and typically works on-site at client locations. However, on March 20, 2020 New York Governor Cuomo signed the New York State on PAUSE executive order, which includes a new directive that all non-essential businesses statewide close in-office personnel functions effective March 22, 2020 to mitigate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and we determined that the Company is a non-essential business. In response to these public health directives and orders, we have implemented and maintained work-from-home policies for certain employees. The effects of continued executive orders, stay at home orders and our work-from-home policies may negatively impact productivity, disrupt our business and impact our ability to service our clients and our clients’ need for our services, the magnitude of which will depend, in part, on the length and severity of the restrictions and other limitations on our ability to conduct our business in the ordinary course. Similar, and perhaps more severe, disruptions in our operations could negatively impact, and may materially negatively impact, our business, operating results and financial condition. Quarantines, shelter-in-place and similar government orders, or the perception that such orders, shutdowns or other restrictions on the conduct of business operations could continue to occur, related to COVID-19 or other infectious diseases could impact us and the business operations of our vendors and customers. Additionally, if the spread of COVID-19 limits our ability to make workers available either because they are ill or due to work-from-home orders, this likely would negatively affect, and may materially negatively affect, our operating results, cash flow and business.
The full financial impact of the pandemic cannot be reasonably estimated at this time. The extent to which COVID-19 impacts our results will depend on future developments, which are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted, including new information which may emerge concerning the severity of the COVID-19 pandemic and the actions taken globally to contain the COVID-19 pandemic or treat its impact, among others. Existing insurance coverage may not provide protection for all costs that may arise from all such possible events. We continue to assess our business operations and system supports and the impact COVID-19 may have on our results and financial condition, but there can be no assurance that this analysis will enable us to avoid part or all of any impact from the spread of COVID-19 or its consequences, including downturns in business sentiment generally or in our sector in particular.
Our success depends on our management team and other key personnel, the loss of any of whom could disrupt our business operations.
Christopher Hughes, former Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer, President and Treasurer, was terminated on February 29, 2020. The Board of Directors of the Company elected Thomas Salerno, formerly branch manager of the New Jersey office of TSR Consulting Services, Inc. to succeed Mr. Hughes as Chief Executive Officer, President and Treasurer. The Company is dependent on Thomas Salerno in his corporate positions and as President of TSR Consulting Services, Inc. The Company has an employment agreement with Mr. Salerno which expires November 2, 2023. The Company is also dependent on certain of its account executives who are responsible for servicing its principal customers and attracting new customers. The Company generally does not have employment contracts with the account executives. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to retain its existing personnel or find and attract additional qualified employees. The loss of the service of any of these personnel could have a material adverse effect on the Company.
The Company is currently subject to ongoing litigation with its former CEO which, like other future lawsuits or investigations, could divert our resources or result in substantial liabilities.
The Company is currently subject to a litigation involving the Company’s former Chief Executive Officer, as discussed in the “Legal Proceedings” section. In connection with this litigation, the Company may enter into a settlement of claims for significant monetary damages. The Company may also be subject to a judgment for significant monetary damages. Defending against and/or prosecuting the current litigation may be time-consuming, expensive and cause diversion of management’s attention.
In the future, we may additionally be subject to legal or administrative proceedings and litigation which may be costly to defend and could materially harm our business, financial conditions and operations. With respect to any litigation, the Company’s insurance may not reimburse it or may not be sufficient to reimburse it for the self-insured retention that the Company is required to satisfy before any insurance applies to a claim, unreimbursed legal fees or an adverse result in any litigation. Such event may adversely impact the Company’s business, operating results or financial condition.
Our business may be materially and adversely impacted if our relationship with one or more of our major customers is lost or disrupted.
In fiscal 2021, the Company’s three largest customers, Consolidated Edison, Citigroup and AgileOne, accounted for 22.4%, 19.9%, and 11.9% of the Company’s consolidated revenue, respectively. Any disruptions in our relationships with our significant customers may have a materially adverse impact on our financial condition and results of operations. AgileOne is a vendor management company through which the Company provides services to three end customers, of which Bristol Myers Squibb is the most significant, representing 11.1% of the Company’s consolidated revenue for fiscal 2021. In total, the Company derives over 31% of its revenue from accounts with vendor management companies. The Company’s 10 largest customers provided 81% of consolidated revenue in fiscal 2021. Client contract terms vary depending on the nature of the engagement, and there can be no assurance that a client will renew a contract when it terminates. In addition, the Company’s contracts are generally cancelable by the client at any time on short notice, and customers may unilaterally reduce their use of the Company’s services under such contracts without penalty. For example, one of the Company’s 10 largest customers has significantly reduced their use of the Company’s services as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. Approximately 27% of the Company’s revenue is derived from end customers in the financial services business. Competitive pressures in financial services, primarily with European based banks, have negatively affected the net effective rates that the Company charges to certain end customers in this industry, which has negatively affected the Company’s gross profit margins. These banks are no longer willing to pay the premium prices which they had previously paid for certain high-end skills. See “Rapidly Changing Industry” below.
In accordance with industry practice, most of the Company’s contracts for contract computer programming services are terminable by either the client or the Company on short notice.
The accounts receivable balances associated with the Company’s largest customers were $4,545,000 for three customers at May 31, 2021 and $3,747,000 for three customers at May 31, 2020. Because of the significant amount of outstanding receivables that the Company may have with its larger customers at any one time, if a client, including a vendor management company which then contracts with the ultimate client, filed for bankruptcy protection or otherwise sought to modify payment terms, it could prevent the Company from collecting on the receivables and have an adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations.
Damage to our reputation may adversely affect our customer relationships and our business, financial condition and results of operations.
The Company’s reputation among its customers, potential customers and the staffing services industry depends on the performance of the technical personnel that the Company places with its customers. If the Company’s customers are not satisfied with the services provided by the technical personnel placed by the Company, or if the technical personnel placed by the Company lack the qualifications or experience necessary to perform the services required by the Company’s customers, the Company may not be able to successfully maintain its relationships with its customers or expand its client base.
We operate in a competitive market for technical personnel, account executives and technical recruiters and disruptions to our business may result if we fail to attract and retain qualified personnel to operate our business and service our customers.
The Company’s success is dependent upon its ability to attract and retain qualified computer professionals to provide as temporary personnel to its customers. Competition for the limited number of qualified professionals with a working knowledge of certain sophisticated computer languages, which the Company requires for its contract computer services business, is intense. The Company believes that there is a shortage of, and significant competition for, software professionals with the skills and experience necessary to perform the services offered by the Company.
The Company’s ability to maintain and renew existing engagements and obtain new business in its contract computer programming business depends, in large part, on its ability to hire and retain technical personnel with the IT skills that keep pace with continuing changes in software evolution, industry standards and technologies, and client preferences. Although the Company generally has been successful in attracting employees with the skills needed to fulfill customer engagements, demand for qualified professionals conversant with certain technologies may outstrip supply as new and additional skills are required to keep pace with evolving computer technology or as competition for technical personnel increases. Increased demand for qualified personnel has resulted and is expected to continue to result in increased expenses to hire and retain qualified technical personnel and has adversely affected the Company’s profit margins.
The Company faces a highly competitive market for hiring and retaining account executives and technical recruiters, which could affect the Company’s ability to hire and retain such personnel, including by increasing the costs of doing so. If the Company is successful in hiring technical recruiters and account executives, there can be no assurance that such hiring will result in increased revenue.
We operate in a rapidly changing industry and a reduction in demand for our technical staffing services may adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
The computer industry is characterized by rapidly changing technology and evolving industry standards. These include the overall increase in the sophistication and interdependency of computer technology and a focus by IT managers on cost-efficient solutions. There can be no assurance that these changes will not adversely affect demand for technical staffing services. Organizations may elect to perform such services in-house or outsource such functions to companies that do not utilize temporary staffing, such as that provided by the Company.
Additionally, a number of companies have, in recent years, limited the number of vendors on their approved vendor lists, and are continuing to do so. In some cases, this has required the Company to subcontract with a company on the approved vendor list to provide services to customers. The staffing industry has also experienced margin erosion caused by this increased competition, and customers leveraging their buying power by consolidating the number of vendors with which they deal. In addition to these factors, there has been intense price competition in the area of IT staffing, pressure on billing rates and pressure by customers for discounts. The Company has endeavored to increase its technical recruiting staff in order to better respond to customers’ increasing demands for both the timeliness, quality and quantities of resume submittals against job requisitions.
The Company cannot predict at this time what long-term effect these changes will have on the Company’s business and results of operations.
The increase in our customers’ use of third-party vendor management companies may weaken our relationship with our customers and adversely impact our ability to development and expand customer relationships.
There have been changes in the industry which have affected the Company’s operating results. Many customers have retained third parties to provide vendor management services, and in excess of 31% of the Company’s revenue is derived through business with vendor management companies. The third party is then responsible for retaining companies to provide temporary IT personnel. This results in the Company contracting with such third parties and not directly with the ultimate customer. This change weakens the Company’s relationship with its customer, which makes it more difficult for the Company to maintain and expand its business with its existing customers. It also reduces the Company’s profit margins.
In addition, the agreements with the vendor management companies are frequently structured as subcontracting agreements, with the vendor management company entering into a services agreement directly with the end customers. As a result, in the event of a bankruptcy of a vendor management company, the Company’s ability to collect its outstanding receivables and continue to provide services could be adversely affected.
We have experienced limited growth in our business and recent economic uncertainties, including as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, have decreased customer demand for our services and our results of operations may continue to be adversely impacted if economic uncertainties exist and demand for our services continues to decrease or plateau as a result.
Demand for the Company’s IT staffing services has been and is significantly affected by the general economic environment. During periods of slowing economic activity, customers may reduce their IT projects and their demand for outside consultants. Therefore, any significant economic downturn could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations. The COVID-19 outbreak in the United States has caused business disruption through mandated and voluntary closing of various businesses. While the disruption is currently expected to be temporary, there is considerable uncertainty around the duration of the closings and the ongoing economic impact. Therefore, the Company expects this matter to continue to negatively impact its operating results in future periods. However, the full financial impact and duration cannot be reasonably estimated at this time. The Company expects that economic conditions will continue to affect the number of consultants on billing with customers and the Company’s profitability. In addition to the impact of the economic uncertainties, the Company has not been successful in expanding its customer base beyond its core customers. There is no assurance that the Company will achieve growth in its revenue.
Increases in payroll-related costs coupled with an inability to increase our fees charged to customers to cover such costs has, and may likely continue to have, an adverse effect on our profitability.
The Company is required to pay a number of federal, state and local payroll and related costs, including unemployment insurance, workers’ compensation insurance, employer’s portion of Social Security and Medicare taxes, among others, for our employees, including those placed with customers. Significant increases in the effective rates of any payroll-related costs would likely have a material adverse effect on the Company. During the past few years, many of the states in which the Company conducts business have significantly increased their state unemployment tax rates in an effort to increase funding for unemployment benefits. Costs have continued to increase as a result of health care reforms and the mandate to provide health insurance to employees under the Affordable Care Act. New York and New Jersey implemented laws over the last several years that require employers to provide certain minimum benefits for employees with respect to paid sick leave and family leave, which has and will continue to increase our payroll-related costs. Many other cities around the country have enacted or are in the process of enacting similar mandates. The Company has not been able to sufficiently increase the fees charged to its customers to cover these mandated cost increases. There are also proposals on the federal and state levels to phase in paid or partially paid family leave. The enacted mandates have had a negative effect on the Company’s profitability and additional mandates will continue to negatively impact the Company’s margins.
The current trend of companies moving technology jobs and projects offshore has caused and could continue to cause revenue to decline.
In the past few years, more companies are using or are considering using low cost offshore outsourcing centers, particularly in India and other East Asian countries, to perform technology related work and projects. This trend has reduced the growth in domestic IT staffing revenue for the industry. This trend has had a negative impact on our business and there can be no assurance that it will not continue to adversely impact the Company’s IT staffing revenue.
Because much of our technical personnel consists of foreign nationals with work visas, changes in immigration laws that restrict the provision of work visas may adversely affect our ability to retain qualified technical personnel.
The Company obtains many of its technical personnel by subcontracting with companies that utilize foreign nationals entering the U.S. on work visas, primarily under the H-1B visa classification. The Company also sponsors foreign nationals on H-1B visas on a limited basis. The H-1B visa classification enables U.S. employers to hire qualified foreign nationals in positions that require an education at least equal to a bachelor’s degree. U.S. Immigration laws and regulations are subject to legislative and administrative changes, as well as changes in the application of standards and enforcement. In June 2020, President Donald Trump issued a proclamation suspending immigration visas for many categories of foreign workers including H-1B through the end of the year, allegedly to protect U.S. workers and jobs amid the COVID-19 pandemic. These and future restrictions on the availability of work visas could restrain the Company’s ability to acquire the skilled professionals needed to meet our customers’ requirements, which could have a material adverse effect on our business. The scope and impact of these changes on the staffing industry and the Company remain unclear, however a narrow interpretation and vigorous enforcement of existing laws and regulations could adversely affect the ability of entities with which the Company subcontracts to utilize foreign nationals and/or renew existing foreign national consultants on assignment. There can be no assurance that the Company or its subcontractors will be able to keep or replace all foreign nationals currently on assignment, or continue to acquire foreign national talent at the same rates as in the past.
We experience fluctuations in our quarterly operating results.
The Company’s revenue and operating results are subject to significant variations from quarter-to-quarter. Revenue is subject to fluctuation based upon a number of factors, including the timing and number of client projects commenced and completed during the quarter, delays incurred in connection with projects, the growth rate of the market for contract computer programming services and general economic conditions. Unanticipated termination of a project or the decision by a client not to proceed to the next stage of a project anticipated by the Company could result in decreased revenue and lower utilization rates which could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, operating results and financial condition. Compensation levels can be impacted by a variety of factors, including competition for highly skilled employees and inflation.
The Company’s operating results also fluctuate due to seasonality. Typically, our billable hours, which directly affect our revenue and profitability, decrease in our third fiscal quarter. Clients closing during the holiday season and for winter weather normally causes the number of billable workdays for consultants on billing with customers to decrease. Additionally, at the beginning of the calendar year, which also falls within our third fiscal quarter, payroll taxes are at their highest. This typically results in our lowest gross margins of the year. The Company’s operating results are also subject to fluctuation as a result of other factors such as vacations, client mandated furloughs and client budgeting requirements.
We believe competition in our industry and for qualified personnel will increase, and there can be no assurance that we will remain competitive.
The technical staffing industry is highly competitive, fragmented and has low barriers to entry. The Company competes for potential customers with providers of outsourcing services, systems integrators, computer systems consultants, other providers of technical staffing services and, to a lesser extent, temporary personnel agencies. The Company competes for technical personnel with other providers of technical staffing services, systems integrators, providers of outsourcing services, computer systems consultants, customers and temporary personnel agencies. Many of the Company’s competitors are significantly larger and have greater financial resources than the Company. The Company believes that the principal competitive factors in obtaining and retaining customers are accurate assessment of customers’ requirements, timely assignment of technical employees with appropriate skills and the price of services. The principal competitive factors in attracting qualified technical personnel are compensation, availability, quality and variety of projects and schedule flexibility. The Company believes that many of the technical personnel included in its database may also be pursuing other employment opportunities. Therefore, the Company believes that its responsiveness to the needs of technical personnel is an important factor in the Company’s ability to fill projects. Although the Company believes it competes favorably with respect to these factors, it expects competition to increase, and there can be no assurance that the Company will remain competitive.
The Company is exposed to contract and other liability, and there can be no assurance that our contracts and insurance coverage would adequately protect the Company from such liability or related claims or litigation.
The personnel provided by the Company to customers provide services involving key aspects of its customers’ software applications. A failure in providing these services could result in a claim for substantial damages against the Company, regardless of the Company’s responsibility for such failure. The Company attempts to limit, contractually, its liability for damages arising from negligence or omissions in rendering services, but it is not always successful in negotiating such limits.
Furthermore, due to increased competition and the requirements of vendor management companies, the Company may be required to accept less favorable terms regarding limitations on liability, including assuming obligations to indemnify customers for damages sustained in connection with the provision of our services. There can be no assurance our contracts will include the desired limitations of liability or that the limitations of liability set forth in our contracts would be enforceable or would otherwise protect the Company from liability for damages.
The Company’s business involves assigning personnel to the workplace of the client, typically under the client’s supervision. Although the Company has little control over the client’s workplace, the Company may be exposed to claims of discrimination and harassment and other similar claims as a result of inappropriate actions allegedly taken against the Company’s personnel by customers. As an employer, the Company is also exposed to other possible employment-related claims. The Company is exposed to liability with respect to actions taken by its technical personnel while on a project, such as damages caused by technical personnel errors, misuse of client proprietary information or theft of client property. To reduce these exposures, the Company maintains insurance policies and a fidelity bond covering general liability, workers’ compensation claims, errors and omissions and employee theft. In certain instances, the Company indemnifies its customers for these exposures. Certain of these costs and liabilities are not covered by insurance. There can be no assurance that insurance coverage will continue to be available and at its current price or that it will be adequate to, or will, cover any such liability.
Our business and our reputation could be adversely affected by a data security incident or the failure to protect sensitive client, employee and Company data, or the failure to comply with applicable regulations relating to data security and privacy.
Our ability to protect client, employee, and Company data and information is critical to our reputation and the success of our business. Our clients and employees expect that their confidential, personal and private information will be secure in our possession. Attacks against security systems have become increasingly sophisticated along with developments in technology, and such attacks have become more prevalent. Consequently, the regulatory environment surrounding cybersecurity and privacy has become more and more demanding and has resulted in new requirements and increasingly demanding standards for protection of information. As a result, the Company may incur increased expenses associated with adequately protecting confidential client, employee, and Company data and complying with applicable regulatory requirements. There can be no assurance that we will be able to prevent unauthorized third parties from breaching our systems and gaining unauthorized access to confidential client, employee, and Company data even if our cybersecurity measures are compliant with regulatory requirements and standards. Unauthorized third party access to confidential client, employee, and Company data stored in our system whether as a result of a third party system breach, systems failure or employee negligence, fraud or misappropriation, could damage our reputation and cause us to lose customers, and could subject us to monetary damages, fines and/or criminal prosecution. Furthermore, unauthorized third-party access to or through our information systems or those we develop for our customers, whether by our employees or third parties, could result in system disruptions, negative publicity, legal liability, monetary damages, and damage to our reputation.
While we take steps to protect our intellectual property rights and proprietary information, there can be no assurance that the Company can prevent misappropriation of such rights and information.
The Company relies primarily upon a combination of trade secret, nondisclosure and other contractual agreements to protect its proprietary rights. The Company generally enters into confidentiality agreements with its employees, consultants, customers and potential customers and limits access to and distribution of its proprietary information. There can be no assurance that the steps taken by the Company in this regard will be adequate to deter misappropriation of its proprietary information or that the Company will be able to detect unauthorized use and take appropriate steps to enforce its intellectual property rights.
Our significant stockholders, particularly if they choose to work together, may have the ability to exert significant influence over our business policies and affairs on matters submitted to our stockholders for approval.
Our largest shareholders, Zeff Capital, L.P. and QAR Industries, Inc., are the beneficial owners of an aggregate of 936,658 shares of Common Stock, which represents approximately 47.7% of the Company’s issued and outstanding Common Stock. By virtue of such ownership, Zeff Capital, L.P. and QAR Industries, Inc. have the ability to exercise significant influence over the Company. For example, this concentrated ownership could delay, defer, or prevent a change in control, merger, consolidation, or sale of all or substantially all of the Company’s assets in transactions that other shareholders strongly support or conversely, this concentrated ownership could result in the consummation of such transactions that many of the Company’s other shareholders do not support. Further, investors may be prevented from affecting matters involving the Company, including:
- the composition of our Board of Directors and, through it, any determination with respect to our business direction and policies, including the appointment and removal of officers;
- our acquisition of assets or other businesses; and
- our corporate financing activities.
This significant concentration of stock ownership may also adversely affect the trading price for our Common Stock because investors may perceive disadvantages in owning stock in a company that is controlled by a small number of stockholders.
Certain provisions of our governing documents may make it more difficult for a third party to acquire us and make a takeover more difficult to complete, even if such a transaction were in the stockholders’ interest.
In addition to the significant concentration of the ownership of our Common Stock, certain provisions of the Company’s charter and by-laws may have the effect of discouraging a third party from making an acquisition proposal for the Company and may thereby inhibit a change in control of the Company under circumstances that could give the holders of Common Stock the opportunity to realize a premium over the then-prevailing market prices. Such provisions include a classified Board of Directors and advance notice requirements for nomination of directors and certain stockholder proposals set forth in the Company’s charter and by-laws.
The issuance of new classes and series of preferred stock may deter or delay a change in control and/or affect our stock price.
The Company’s charter authorizes the Board of Directors to create new classes and series of preferred stock and to establish the preferences and rights of any such classes and series without further action of the stockholders. The issuance of additional classes and series of capital stock may have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a change in control of the Company.
Further, the Company’s stock price could be extremely volatile and, as a result, investors may not be able to resell their shares at or above the price they paid for them.
Among the factors that have previously affected the Company’s stock price and may do so in the future are:
- limited float and a low average daily trading volume;
- industry trends and the performance of the Company’s customers;
- fluctuations in the Company’s results of operations;
- litigation; and
- general market conditions.
The stock market has, and may in the future, experience extreme volatility that has often been unrelated to the operating performance of particular companies. These broad market fluctuations may adversely affect the market price of the Company’s Common Stock.

---

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
None

---

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
Item 2. Properties
The Company leases 8,000 square feet of space in Hauppauge, New York for a term expiring December 31, 2023, with annual rents of approximately $94,000. This space is used as executive and administrative offices for the Company and the Company’s operating subsidiary. The Company also leases sales and recruiting offices in New York City (lease expires August 2022) and Edison, New Jersey (lease expires May 2027), with aggregate annual rents of approximately $158,000 and $115,000, respectively. The Company entered into an agreement to sublease the New York City office space, resulting in a right-of-use asset impairment charge of $137,000 recorded in fiscal 2021.
The Company believes the present locations are adequate for its current needs as well as for the future expansion of its existing business.

---

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
Paskowitz Stockholder Litigation
On October 16, 2018, the Company was served with a complaint filed on October 11, 2018 in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Queens County, by Susan Paskowitz, a stockholder of the Company, against the Company; Joseph F. Hughes and Winifred M. Hughes; former directors Christopher Hughes, Raymond A. Roel, Brian J. Mangan, Regina Dowd, James J. Hill, William Kelly, and Eric Stein; as well as stockholders Zeff Capital, L.P., QAR Industries, Inc. and Fintech Consulting LLC (the “Stockholder Litigation”). The complaint purported to be a class action lawsuit asserting claims on behalf of all minority stockholders of the Company. Ms. Paskowitz alleged the following: the sale by Joseph F. Hughes and Winifred M. Hughes of an aggregate of 819,491 shares of the Company’s common stock (“controlling interest”) to Zeff Capital, L.P., QAR Industries, Inc. and Fintech Consulting LLC was in breach of Joseph F. Hughes’ and Winifred M. Hughes’ fiduciary duties and to the detriment of the Company’s minority stockholders; the former members of the Board of Directors of the Company named in the complaint breached their fiduciary duties by failing to immediately adopt a rights plan that would have prevented Joseph F. Hughes and Winifred M. Hughes from selling their shares and preserved a higher premium for all stockholders; Zeff Capital, L.P., QAR Industries, Inc. and Fintech Consulting LLC are “partners” and constitute a “group.” Ms. Paskowitz also asserted that Zeff Capital, L.P., QAR Industries, Inc. and Fintech Consulting LLC aided and abetted Joseph F. Hughes’ and Winifred M. Hughes’ conduct, and ultimately sought to buy out the remaining shares of the Company at an unfair price.
On June 14, 2019, Ms. Paskowitz filed an amended complaint in the Stockholder Litigation with the court against the former members of the Board of Directors and Zeff Capital, L.P., QAR Industries, Inc. and Fintech Consulting LLC, which asserted substantially similar allegations to those contained in the October 11, 2018 complaint, but omitted Regina Dowd, Joseph F. Hughes and Winifred M. Hughes as defendants. In addition to the former members of the Board of Directors named in the original complaint, the amended complaint named former directors Ira Cohen, Joseph Pennacchio, and William Kelly as defendants. The amended complaint also asserted a derivative claim purportedly on behalf of the Company against the named former members of the Board of Directors. The amended complaint sought declaratory judgment and unspecified monetary damages. The complaint requested: (1) a declaration from the court that the former members of the Board of Directors named in the complaint breached their fiduciary duties by failing to timely adopt a stockholder rights plan, which resulted in the loss of the ability to auction the Company off to the highest bidder without interference from Zeff Capital, L.P., QAR Industries, Inc. and Fintech Consulting LLC; (2) damages derivatively on behalf of the Company for unspecified harm caused by the named Directors’ alleged breaches of fiduciary duties; (3) damages and equitable relief derivatively on behalf of the Company for the named Directors’ alleged failure to adopt proper corporate governance practices; and (4) damages and injunctive relief against Zeff Capital, L.P., QAR Industries, Inc. and Fintech Consulting LLC based on their knowing dissemination of false or misleading public statements concerning their status as a group. The complaint did not assign any monetary values to alleged damages.
On July 15, 2019, the Company filed an answer to the amended complaint in the Stockholder Litigation and cross-claims against Zeff Capital, L.P., QAR Industries, Inc. and Fintech Consulting LLC for breaches of their fiduciary duties, aiding and abetting breaches of fiduciary duties, and indemnification and contribution based on their misappropriation of material nonpublic information and their failure to disclose complete and accurate information in SEC filings concerning their group actions to attempt a creeping takeover of the Company, which was thereafter amended on July 26, 2019.
On December 21, 2018, the Company filed a complaint in the United States District Court, Southern District of New York, against Zeff Capital, L.P., Zeff Holding Company, LLC, Daniel Zeff, QAR Industries, Inc., Robert Fitzgerald, Fintech Consulting LLC, and Tajuddin Haslani for violations of the disclosure and anti-fraud requirements of the federal securities laws under Sections 13(d) and 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”), and the related rules and regulations promulgated by the SEC, for failing to disclose to the Company and its stockholders their formation of a group and the group’s intention to seize control of the Company (the “SDNY Action”). The complaint requested that the court, among other things, declare that the defendants have solicited proxies without filing timely, accurate and complete reports on Schedule 13D and Schedule 14A in violation of Sections 13(d) and 14(a) of the Exchange Act, direct the defendants to file with the SEC complete and accurate disclosures, enjoin the defendants from voting any of their shares prior to such time as complete and accurate disclosures have been filed, and enjoin the defendants from further violations of the Exchange Act with respect to the securities of the Company.
On January 7, 2019, Ms. Paskowitz filed a related action against Zeff Capital, L.P., Zeff Holding Company, LLC, Daniel Zeff, QAR Industries, Inc., Robert Fitzgerald, Fintech Consulting LLC, and Tajuddin Haslani in the Southern District of New York, which asserted claims against them for breach of fiduciary duty and under federal securities laws similar to those asserted in the Company’s action. Although the Company is not a party to Ms. Paskowitz’s action, the court determined to treat the Company’s and Ms. Paskowitz’s respective actions as related.
On August 7, 2019, following the Company’s initial rescheduling of the 2018 Annual Meeting for September 13, 2019 and the filing of Preliminary Proxy Statements by the Company and Zeff Capital, L.P., Zeff Capital, L.P. filed a complaint in the Delaware Court of Chancery against the Company seeking an order requiring the Company to hold its next annual meeting of stockholders on or around September 13, 2019, and obligating the Company to elect Class I and Class III directors at that annual meeting.
On August 13, 2019, the Company filed a motion for preliminary injunction in the SDNY Action in advance of the Company’s 2018 Annual Meeting originally scheduled for September 13, 2019 and requested leave to file a motion for expedited discovery. The Court denied the Company’s motion for preliminary injunction but ordered Zeff to “make clear that the second set of directors” described by Zeff in its preliminary proxy statement “is contingent upon the resolution of a proceeding in Delaware Chancery Court.”
On August 30, 2019, the Company entered into a settlement and release agreement (the “Settlement Agreement”) with Zeff Capital, L.P., Zeff Holding Company, LLC, Daniel Zeff, QAR Industries, Inc., Robert Fitzgerald, Fintech Consulting LLC and Tajuddin Haslani (collectively, the “Investor Parties”) with respect to the proxy contest pertaining to the election of directors at the 2018 Annual Meeting, which was held on October 22, 2019. Pursuant to the Settlement Agreement, the parties agreed to forever settle and resolve any and all disputes between the parties, including without limitation disputes arising out of or relating to the following litigations:
(i) The complaint relating to alleged breaches of fiduciary duties filed on November 1, 2018 by Fintech Consulting LLC against the Company in the Delaware Court of Chancery, which was previously dismissed voluntarily;
(ii) The complaint for declaratory and injunctive relief for violations of the federal securities laws filed on December 21, 2018 by the Company against the Investor Parties in the United States District Court in the Southern District of New York;
(iii) Cross-claims relating to alleged breaches of fiduciary duties and for indemnification and contribution filed on July 26, 2019 by the Company against the Investor Parties in New York Supreme Court, Queens County; and
(iv) The complaint to compel annual meeting of stockholders filed on August 7, 2019 by Zeff Capital, L.P. against the Company in the Delaware Court of Chancery.
No party admitted any liability by entering into the Settlement Agreement. The Settlement Agreement did not resolve the Stockholder Litigation filed by Susan Paskowitz against the Company, Joseph F. Hughes, Winifred M. Hughes and certain former directors of the Company in the Supreme Court of the State of New York on October 11, 2018.
Concurrently with the Settlement Agreement, the parties entered into a share repurchase agreement (the “Repurchase Agreement”) which provided for the purchase by the Company and Christopher Hughes, the Company’s former President and Chief Executive Officer, of the shares of the Company’s Common Stock held by the Investor Parties (the “Repurchase”). The Settlement Agreement also contemplated that, if the Repurchase was completed, the Company would make a settlement payment to the Investor Parties at the closing of the Repurchase in an amount of approximately $1,500,000 (the “Settlement Payment”). However, the Repurchase and Settlement Payment were not completed by the deadline of December 30, 2019.
Pursuant to the Settlement Agreement, (1) the Company agreed to adopt an amendment to the Company’s Amended and Restated By-Laws, dated April 9, 2015 (the “By-Laws Amendment”), providing that stockholders of the Company owning at least forty percent (40%) of the issued and outstanding Common Stock may request a special meeting of stockholders; (2) the Investor Parties agreed not to take any action to call or otherwise cause a special meeting of stockholders to occur prior to December 30, 2019 (unless the Company had failed to hold the 2018 Annual Meeting); (3) the Company agreed to amend and restate the Company’s Rights Agreement, dated August 29, 2018 (the “Amended Rights Agreement”), to confirm that a Distribution Date (as defined in the Amended Rights Agreement) shall not occur as a result of any request by any of the Investor Parties for a special meeting; (4) the Company agreed that prior to the earlier of (A) the completion of the Repurchase and the payment of the Settlement Payment and (B) January 1, 2020, the Board of Directors shall not consist of more than seven (7) directors.
Pursuant to the terms of the Settlement Agreement, the two nominees for director made by Zeff Capital, L.P. were elected as directors at the Company’s 2018 Annual Meeting held on October 22, 2019. Please see the Company’s current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on October 21, 2019 for more information about the background of the election of directors at the Company’s 2018 Annual Meeting.
Pursuant to the terms of the Settlement Agreement, inasmuch as the Repurchase was not completed and the Settlement Payment was not made by December 30, 2019, the members of the Board of Directors (other than the two directors who were nominated by Zeff Capital, L.P. and elected as directors at the 2018 Annual Meeting) resigned from the Board effective 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on December 30, 2019. Immediately thereafter, the two remaining directors appointed Robert Fitzgerald to the Board of Directors. Please see the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on December 31, 2019 for more information about the background and the appointment of Robert Fitzgerald.
In addition, the Settlement Agreement provides for mutual releases between the Company and each of the Investor Parties and certain of their affiliates. Each of the Investor Parties and certain of their affiliates also agreed to certain customary standstill provisions, including without limitation, with regard to certain actions in connection with the 2018 Annual Meeting, Extraordinary Transactions (as defined in the Settlement Agreement) with the Company, and the acquisition of any securities (or beneficial ownership thereof) of the Company, each of which expired on December 30, 2019.
The foregoing is not a complete description of the terms of the Settlement Agreement and the Repurchase Agreement. For a further description of the terms of the Settlement Agreement and the Repurchase Agreement, including copies of the Settlement Agreement and Repurchase Agreement, please see the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed by the Company with the SEC on September 3, 2019.
On October 21, 2019, the Company entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (the “MOU”) with Susan Paskowitz providing for the settlement of the Stockholder Litigation filed by Ms. Paskowitz on October 11, 2018. The MOU provides for the settlement of the claims by Ms. Paskowitz that (1) the former members of the Board named in the original complaint allegedly breached their fiduciary duties by failing to immediately adopt a rights plan that would have prevented the sale by Joseph F. Hughes and Winifred M. Hughes of an aggregate of 819,491 shares of the Company’s common stock to the Investor Parties; (2) the former members of the Board named in the amended complaint allegedly breached their fiduciary duties and failed to adopt proper corporate governance practices; and (3) the Investor Parties acted as “partners” and constituted a “group” in their purchase of shares from Joseph F. Hughes and Winifred M. Hughes and knowingly disseminated false or misleading public statements concerning their status as a group.
Pursuant to the terms of the MOU, the Company will (1) implement certain corporate governance reforms described in the MOU within 30 days of a final order and judgment entered by the court, and keep these corporate governance reforms in place for 5 years from the time of the final order and judgment; and (2) acknowledge that the plaintiff, Ms. Paskowitz, and her counsel provided a substantial benefit to the Company and its stockholders through the prosecution of the Stockholder Litigation and other related actions filed by Ms. Paskowitz described above.
On December 16, 2019, the Company entered into a Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement (the “Stipulation”) with Susan Paskowitz in the Stockholder Litigation, which retained the terms and conditions of settlement of the Stockholder Litigation contained in the MOU described in the preceding paragraph, with the addition that the Company will pay to plaintiff’s counsel an award of attorneys’ fees and reimbursement of expenses in the amount of $260,000 (collectively, the “Stockholder Litigation Settlement”). The Stockholder Litigation Settlement does not contain any admission of liability, wrongdoing or responsibility by any of the parties, and provides for mutual releases by all parties. Each stockholder of the Company is a member of the plaintiff class unless such stockholder opts out of the class. The Stipulation is independent of the Settlement Agreement and Repurchase Agreement that the Company had entered into with the Investor Parties.
On December 24, 2019, Ms. Paskowitz moved for preliminary approval of the Stipulation. On May 21, 2020, the Court entered an order preliminarily approving the Stipulation. The Court conducted a settlement hearing on April 20, 2021 to consider final approval of the Stipulation. On May 25, 2021, the Court issued a final order and judgment approving all material terms in the Stipulation. Pursuant to the terms of the final order, the Court fully and finally approved the settlement set forth in the Stipulation and dismissed the Stockholder Litigation with prejudice. The settlement payment was paid by the Company’s insurance provider under its insurance policy.
Dispute with Former CEO
The Company terminated Christopher Hughes, the former Chief Executive Officer of the Company (“Hughes”), effective February 29, 2020 for “Cause” as defined in Section 6(a) of his Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated August 9, 2018 (the “Employment Agreement”). Despite having already been terminated from employment, on March 2, 2020, the Company received a letter from Mr. Hughes, providing notice of his intent to resign for “Good Reason” as defined in Section 7(c) of the Employment Agreement pursuant to which he claimed to be entitled to the “Enhanced Severance Amount” under the Employment Agreement. Hughes filed a complaint against the Company in the Supreme Court of the State of New York in March 2020 alleging two causes of action: (1) breach of his employment contract; and (2) breach of duty of good faith and fair dealing. Plaintiff Hughes alleges that he was terminated without cause or in the alternative that he resigned for good reason and therefore, pursuant to the Employment Agreement, Hughes seeks severance pay in the amount of $1,000,000 and reasonable costs and attorney’s fees. The Company denies Plaintiff’s allegations in their entirety and has filed counterclaims against Plaintiff for (1) declaratory relief; (2) breach of confidence/non-compete agreement; (3) declaratory and injunctive relief - confidence/non-compete; (4) tortious interference with current and prospective contractual and economic relations; (5) breach of fiduciary duty; (6) misappropriation of trade secrets; (7) declaratory and injunctive relief - unfair competition; and (8) conversion. The Company intends to vigorously defend and litigate against this matter while recognizing the costs of litigation, including that it may divert the attention of management and key personnel from business operations.
At this time, it is not possible to predict the outcome of any of these litigation matters, to the extent they are ongoing, or their effect on the Company and the Company’s consolidated financial position.

---

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURE
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures
Not applicable.
PART II

---

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY
Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
The Company’s shares of Common Stock trade on the NASDAQ Capital Market under the symbol TSRI. The following are the high and low sales prices for each quarter during the fiscal years ended May 31, 2021 and 2020:
JUNE 1, 2020 - MAY 31, 2021
1ST
QUARTER 2ND
QUARTER 3RD
QUARTER 4TH
QUARTER
High Sales Price $ 6.69 $ 7.25 $ 18.73 $ 14.70
Low Sales Price 3.26 4.47 6.20 7.57
JUNE 1, 2019 - MAY 31, 2020
1ST
QUARTER 2ND
QUARTER 3RD
QUARTER 4TH
QUARTER
High Sales Price $ 4.93 $ 4.39 $ 8.88 $ 3.96
Low Sales Price 4.23 3.20 2.64 2.70
There were 46 holders of record of the Company’s Common Stock as of July 31, 2021. Additionally, the Company estimates that there were approximately 700 beneficial holders as of that date. The Company has no current plans to implement a quarterly dividend program or pay any other special cash dividend.
There only securities authorized for issuance under any equity compensation plan relate to the 2020 Equity Incentive Plan. See Note 15 to the consolidated financial statements, contained elsewhere in this report.

---

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
Item 6. Selected Financial Data
Not applicable.

---

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the Company’s consolidated financial statements and notes thereto presented elsewhere in this report.
Results of Operations
The following table sets forth for the periods indicated certain financial information derived from the Company’s consolidated statements of operations. There can be no assurance that historical trends in operating results will continue in the future:
Years Ended May 31,
(Dollar Amounts in Thousands)
Amount % of
Revenue Amount % of
Revenue
Revenue, Net $ 68,821 100.0 % $ 59,121 100.0 %
Cost of Sales 57,500 83.6 49,943 84.5
Gross Profit 11,321 16.4 9,178 15.5
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses 11,809 17.1 10,929 18.5
Loss from Operations (488 ) (0.7 ) (1,751 ) (3.0 )
Other Expense, Net (198 ) (0.3 ) (59 ) (0.1 )
Loss Before Income Taxes (686 ) (1.0 ) (1,810 ) (3.1 )
Benefit from Income Taxes (109 ) (0.1 ) (712 ) (1.2 )
Consolidated Net Loss (577 ) (0.9 ) (1,098 ) (1.9 )
Net Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interest 0.0 0.0
Net Loss Attributable to TSR, Inc. $ (601 ) (0.9 )% $ (1,126 ) (1.9 )%
Revenue
Revenue consists primarily of revenue from computer programming consulting services. Revenue for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2021 increased approximately $9,700,000 or 16.4% from the fiscal year ended May 31, 2020, primarily due to new business development and the acquisition of Geneva. Excluding the added business activity of $8,805,000 from the Geneva client base, revenue would have increased $895,000 or 1.5%. The average number of consultants on billing with customers increased from 416 for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2020 to 479 for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2021. There were 308 and 335 IT contractors at May 31, 2020 and 2021, respectively; while there were 108 and 144 clerical and administrative contractors at May 31, 2020 and 2021, respectively.
We experienced terminated assignments and a decrease in demand for new assignments during fiscal 2021 due to the COVID-19 pandemic, which led to the lower number of consultant placements during the year and negatively impacted the Company’s revenues. Additionally, the COVID-19 pandemic has created operational challenges. The start of certain new assignments has been and continues to be delayed due to delays in obtaining necessary clearances, as many of the agencies required to be contacted in obtaining the information needed for background checks have been fully or partially closed. By the end of the first quarter of fiscal 2021, the Company had used 100% of the $6,659,000 proceeds from the PPP Loan (as defined in Note 10 to the Consolidated Financial Statements elsewhere in this report) it received in April 2020 to fund its payroll and other allowable expenses, which was fully forgiven in July 2021. The use of these proceeds allowed the Company to avoid certain salary reductions, furloughs and layoffs of employees during the covered period.
Cost of Sales
Cost of sales for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2021 increased approximately $7,557,000 or 15.1% to $57,500,000 from $49,943,000 in the prior year period. The increase in cost of sales resulted primarily from an increase in consultants placed with customers, primarily from the new business development activity within the existing Geneva client base. Cost of sales as a percentage of revenue decreased from 84.5% in the fiscal year ended May 31, 2020 to 83.6% in the fiscal year ended May 31, 2021. The percentage increase in cost of sales for the fiscal 2021 as compared to fiscal 2020 (15.1% increase) was lower than the percentage increase in revenue for fiscal 2021 as compared to fiscal 2020 (16.4% increase), causing an increase in gross margins.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
Selling, general and administrative expenses consist primarily of expenses relating to account executives, technical recruiters, facilities costs, management and corporate overhead. These expenses increased approximately $880,000 or 8.1% from $10,929,000 in the fiscal year ended May 31, 2020 to $11,809,000 in the fiscal year ended May 31, 2021. The increase in these expenses primarily resulted from an additional $1,721,000 in selling, general and administrative expenses from the newly acquired Geneva operation offset by a decrease of $868,000 in amounts paid for legal and advisory services from the prior year related to the Stockholder Litigation and costs surrounding the prior year proxy and annual meeting. Additionally, the Company incurred non-cash compensation expenses of $236,000 in fiscal 2021 related to the TSR, Inc. 2020 Equity Incentive Plan and also recorded an asset impairment charge of $137,000 in fiscal 2021 due to the signing of a subletting agreement for one of its offices. Selling, general and administrative expenses, as a percentage of revenue, decreased from 18.5% in the fiscal year ended May 31, 2020 to 17.1% in the fiscal year ended May 31, 2021.
Other Expense
Other expense for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2021 resulted primarily from net interest expense of approximately $193,000 and a mark to market loss of approximately $5,000 on the Company’s marketable equity securities. Other expense for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2020 resulted primarily from net interest expense of $75,000 and a mark to market gain of approximately $15,000 on the Company’s marketable equity securities.
Income Taxes
The effective income tax rates were a benefit of 15.9% for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2021 and a benefit of 39.3% for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2020. In the prior fiscal year, the Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security Act (the “CARES Act”) allowed net operating losses to be carried back five years. The Company applied for refunds of approximately $586,000 based on the fiscal 2019 loss. The deferred tax asset provided from the loss in fiscal 2019 was originally recorded at the lower federal rate of 21%. It was used in fiscal 2020 at the higher federal rate of 34% used prior to 2018, resulting in an additional benefit in excess of $200,000. The rates for both years consist of the new federal corporate tax rate of 21.0% effective January 1, 2018. The benefit of the deferred tax asset will be limited to 21% for federal income tax purposes in fiscal years going forward.
Net Loss Attributable to TSR
Net loss attributable to TSR was approximately $601,000 in the fiscal year ended May 31, 2021 compared to a loss of $1,126,000 in the fiscal year ended May 31, 2020. The decrease in the net loss was primarily attributable to the increase in revenue and gross profit from the Geneva acquisition and a decrease in legal and advisory fees.
Impact of Inflation and Changing Prices
For the fiscal years ended May 31, 2021 and 2020, inflation and changing prices did not have a material effect on the Company’s revenue or income from continuing operations.
Liquidity, Capital Resources and Changes in Financial Condition
The Company’s cash was sufficient to enable it to meet its liquidity requirements during the fiscal year ended May 31, 2021. The Company expects that its cash and cash equivalents and the Company’s revolving credit facility (the “Credit Facility”) pursuant to a Loan and Security Agreement with Access Capital, Inc. (the “Lender”)will be sufficient to provide the Company with adequate resources to meet its liquidity requirements for the 12 month period following the issuance of these financial statements. Utilizing its accounts receivable as collateral, the Company has secured the Credit Facility to increase its liquidity as necessary. As of May 31, 2021, the net borrowings outstanding against this Credit Facility were approximately $93,000. The amount the Company has borrowed fluctuates and, at times, it has utilized the maximum amount of $2,000,000 available under this facility in the prior fiscal year to fund its payroll and other obligations. The Company was in compliance with all covenants under the Credit Facility as of May 31, 2021 and through the date of this filing. Additionally, in April 2020, the Company secured a PPP Loan in the amount of $6,659,000 to meet its obligations in the face of potential disruptions in its business operations and the potential inability of its customers to pay their accounts when due. As of August 31, 2020, the Company had used 100% of the PPP Loan funds to fund its payroll and for other allowable expenses under the PPP Loan. The use of these funds allowed the Company to avoid certain salary reductions, furloughs and layoffs of employees during the period. The Company applied for PPP Loan forgiveness and subsequent to the end of the reporting period, the application for forgiveness was accepted and approved; the PPP Loan was fully forgiven in July 2021.
At May 31, 2021, the Company had working capital (total current assets in excess of total current liabilities) of approximately $8,898,000 including cash and cash equivalents and marketable securities of $7,416,000 as compared to working capital of $12,239,000 including cash and cash equivalents and marketable securities of $9,780,000 at May 31, 2020.
Net cash flow of approximately $1,304,000 was provided by operations during the fiscal year ended May 31, 2021 as compared to $1,567,000 of net cash flow used in operations in the prior year. The cash provided by operations for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2021 primarily resulted from an increase in accounts payable and other payables and accrued expenses of $2,798,000 and a decrease in prepaid and recoverable income taxes of $590,000 offset by the consolidated net loss of $577,000 and an increase in accounts receivable of $1,824,000. The increase in accounts payable and accrued expenses primarily resulted from the deferral of $1,269,000 in payroll taxes as allowed by the CARES Act. One half of these deferred payroll taxes are due December 31, 2021 and the second half on December 31, 2022. The cash used in operations for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2020 primarily resulted from the consolidated net loss of $1,098,000, a decrease in accounts payable and accrued expenses of $892,000 and an increase in prepaid and recoverable income taxes of $547,000, which were offset, to an extent, by a decrease in accounts receivable of $386,000 and the accrual of $828,000 for a legal settlement.
Net cash used in investing activities of approximately $3,226,000 for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2021 primarily resulted from the acquisition of Geneva in the amount of $3,100,000 and purchases of fixed assets of $126,000. Net cash provided by investing activities of $471,000 for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2020 primarily resulted from not reinvesting the proceeds of matured certificates of deposit of $492,000 offset, to an extent, by purchases of fixed assets of $21,000.
Net cash used in financing activities of approximately $437,000 during the fiscal year ended May 31, 2021 resulted from net payments on the Company’s Credit Facility of $409,000 and distributions to the minority interest of $28,000. Net cash provided by financing activities during the fiscal year ended May 31, 2020 of $7,132,000 primarily resulted from proceeds from the PPP Loan of $6,659,220 and net drawings under the Company’s Credit Facility of $501,000.
The Company’s capital resource commitments at May 31, 2021 consisted of lease obligations on its branch and corporate facilities and an accrued legal settlement payable. The net present value of its future lease and settlement payments were approximately $1,017,000 and $867,000, respectively, as of May 31, 2021. The Company intends to finance these commitments primarily from the Company’s available cash and Credit Facility.
Impact of New Accounting Standards
Effective June 1, 2019, the Company adopted Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2016-02, Leases, which sets out the principle for the recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of leases for both parties to a contract (i.e., lessees and lessors). The new standard requires lessees to classify leases as either finance or operating leases and record a right-of-use asset and a lease liability for all leases with a term of greater than 12 months regardless of their classification. An accounting policy election may be made to account for leases with a term of 12 months or less similar to existing guidance for operating leases today. ASU No. 2016-02 supersedes the existing guidance on accounting for leases. In July 2018, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued ASU No. 2018-11, Leases (Topic 842): Targeted Improvements, which allows for an optional transition method for the adoption of Topic 842. The two permitted transition methods are now the modified retrospective approach, which applies the new lease requirements at the beginning of the earliest period presented, and the optional transition method, which applies the new lease requirements through a cumulative-effect adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings in the period of adoption. ASU 2016-02 is effective for our fiscal year ended May 31, 2020 and the interim periods within that year. The Company adopted this standard in the first quarter of fiscal 2020 using the optional transition method. The Company also elected the practical expedients that allow us to carry forward the historical lease classification. The Company has established an inventory of existing leases and implemented a new process of evaluating the classification of each lease. The financial impact of the adoption of the new standard at June 1, 2019 increased total assets and total liabilities by approximately $690,000. The financial impact of the adoption primarily relates to the capitalization of right-of-use assets and recognition of lease liabilities related to operating leases.
Critical Accounting Policies
The SEC defines “critical accounting policies” as those that require the application of management’s most difficult, subjective or complex judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain and may change in subsequent periods.
The Company’s significant accounting policies are described in Note 1 to its consolidated financial statements, contained elsewhere in this report. The Company believes that the following accounting policies require the application of management’s most difficult, subjective or complex judgments:
Revenue Recognition
Revenues are recognized as control of the promised service is transferred to customers, in an amount that reflects the consideration expected in exchange for the services. Revenues from contract assignments are recognized over time, based on hours worked by the Company’s contract professionals. The performance of the requested service over time is the single performance obligation for assignment revenues. Certain customers may receive discounts (e.g., volume discounts, rebates, prompt-pay discounts) and adjustments to the amounts billed. These discounts, rebates and adjustments are considered variable consideration. Volume discounts are the largest component of variable consideration and are estimated using the most likely amount method prescribed by Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 606, contracts terms and estimates of revenue. Revenues are recognized net of variable consideration to the extent that it is probable that a significant reversal of revenues will not occur in subsequent periods. Payment terms vary and the time between invoicing and when payment is due is not significant. There are no financing components to the Company’s arrangements. There are no incremental costs to obtain contracts and costs to fulfill contracts are expensed as incurred. The Company’s operations are primarily located in the United States. The Company recognizes most of its revenue on a gross basis when it acts as a principal in its transactions. The Company has direct contractual relationships with its customers, bears the risks and rewards of its arrangements, and has the discretion to select the contract professionals and establish the price for the services to be provided. Additionally, the Company retains control over its contract professionals based on its contractual arrangements. The Company primarily provides services through its employees and to a lesser extent, through subcontractors; the related costs are included in cost of sales. The Company includes billable expenses (out-of-pocket reimbursable expenses) in revenue and the associated expenses are included in cost of sales.
Valuation of Deferred Tax Assets
We regularly evaluate our ability to recover the reported amount of our deferred income tax assets considering several factors, including our estimate of the likelihood of the Company generating sufficient taxable income in future years during the period over which temporary differences reverse. Presently, the Company believes that it is more likely than not that it will realize the benefits of its deferred tax assets based primarily on the Company’s history of and projections for taxable income in the future. In the event that actual results differ from our estimates or we adjust these estimates in future periods, we may need to establish a valuation allowance against a portion or all of our deferred tax assets, which could materially impact our financial position or results of operations.
Goodwill
Goodwill is recorded when the purchase price paid for an acquisition exceeds the estimated fair value of the net identified tangible and intangible assets acquired. Goodwill is not amortized but is subject to impairment analysis at least once annually or more frequently upon the occurrence of an event or when circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of a unit is greater than its fair value.
Intangible Assets
The Company amortizes its intangible assets over their estimated useful lives and will review these assets for impairment when there is evidence that events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of these assets is measured by comparing the carrying amounts to the future undiscounted cash flows the assets are expected to generate. If intangible assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized equals the amount by which the carrying value of the asset exceeds its fair market value.

---

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
The Company is a smaller reporting company and is therefore not required to provide this information.

---

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
Index to Consolidated Financial Statements
Page
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Consolidated Financial Statements:
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of May 31, 2021 and 2020
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended May 31, 2021 and 2020
Consolidated Statements of Equity for the years ended May 31, 2021 and 2020
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended May 31, 2021 and 2020
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Board of Directors and Shareholders
TSR, Inc.
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of TSR, Inc. (the “Company”) as of May 31, 2021 and 2020, and the related consolidated statements of operations, equity and cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended May 31, 2021, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of May 31, 2021 and 2020, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended May 31, 2021 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Basis for Opinion
These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial report, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.
Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Critical Audit Matter
The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current period audit of the consolidated financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (i) related to accounts or disclosures that are material to the consolidated financial statements and (ii) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of a critical audit matter does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.
Business Combination
As described in Note 11 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company completed the acquisition of Geneva Consulting Group, Inc. (“Geneva”) during the year ended May 31, 2021. The acquisition was accounted for as a business combination using the acquisition method of accounting.
We identified the Company’s accounting for the Geneva acquisition as a critical audit matter. Auditing the Company’s business combination was complex and subjective due to the significant estimation and judgment in determining the fair values assigned to the acquired assets, including identifiable intangible assets, and assumed liabilities as well as a liability for contingent consideration related to an earn-out payable upon the achievement of projected results. Specifically, the forecasted cash flows are sensitive to significant assumptions such as discount rates, projected annual revenue growth rates, projected long-term growth rates and residual or terminal values, all of which are affected by expected future market or economic conditions, including the effects of the global pandemic. In addition, our audit effort involved the use of a professional within our firm with specialized skill and knowledge in valuation methods and models.
The primary procedures we performed to address this critical audit matter included the following:
· Obtaining an understanding of and evaluating the Company’s process to estimate future cashflows related to the Geneva business, including the methods, data, and significant assumptions used in developing the discounted cashflow model as well as testing the completeness and accuracy of the underlying data used by the Company in its analyses.
· Evaluating the reasonableness of the Company’s forecasted revenues, operating results, and cash flows by comparing those forecasts to the underlying business strategies and growth plans, including existing customer relationships, and to the historical results of Geneva. In addition, we performed sensitivity analyses related to the key inputs to forecasted cash flows, including revenue growth rates and discount rates, to evaluate whether the changes in the assumptions would result in a material change to forecasted cash flows.
· With the assistance of the firm’s valuation professionals, evaluating the reasonableness of the Company’s valuation models and unobservable inputs such as weighted average cost of capital, discount rates and terminal values.
/s/ CohnReznick LLP
We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2008.
Jericho, New York
August 23, 2021
TSR, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
May 31, 2021 and 2020
ASSETS
Current Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents $ 7,370,646 $ 9,730,022
Marketable securities 45,696 50,344
Accounts receivable:
Trade, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $181,000 in 2021 and 2020 9,660,742 7,057,365
Other 32,508 5,088
9,693,250 7,062,453
Prepaid expenses 253,694 202,862
Prepaid and recoverable income taxes 8,671 598,893
Total Current Assets 17,371,957 17,644,574
Equipment and leasehold improvements, at cost:
Equipment 154,499 112,435
Furniture and fixtures 64,766 124,371
Leasehold improvements 51,979 60,058
271,244 296,864
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization 155,006 276,673
116,238 20,191
Other assets 47,663 49,653
Right-of-use asset 895,573 377,182
Intangible assets, net 1,671,750 -
Goodwill 785,883 -
Deferred income taxes 941,000 784,000
Total Assets $ 21,830,064 $ 18,875,600
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
TSR, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
May 31, 2021 and 2020
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
Current Liabilities:
Accounts and other payables $ 2,083,140 $ 503,166
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities:
Salaries, wages and commissions 3,634,885 2,240,063
Other 884,531 791,570
4,519,416 3,031,633
Advances from customers 1,170,500 1,181,234
Credit facility 92,527 501,134
Legal settlement payable - current 298,370 -
Operating lease liabilities - current 309,731 188,799
Total Current Liabilities 8,473,684 5,405,966
Operating lease liabilities, net of current portion 707,369 192,409
Legal settlement payable, net of current portion 568,739 827,822
SBA Paycheck Protection Program loan payable 6,659,220 6,659,220
Total Liabilities 16,409,012 13,085,417
Commitments and Contingencies
Equity:
TSR, Inc.
Preferred stock, $1.00 par value, authorized 500,000 shares; none issued - -
Class A Preferred Stock, Series One, authorized 0 and 30,000 shares; none issued - -
Common stock, $0.01 par value, authorized 12,500,000 shares; issued 3,114,163 shares; 1,962,062 outstanding 31,142 31,142
Additional paid-in capital 5,339,200 5,102,868
Retained earnings 13,540,822 14,141,796
18,911,164 19,275,806
Less: treasury stock, 1,152,101 shares, at cost 13,514,003 13,514,003
Total TSR, Inc. Equity 5,397,161 5,761,803
Noncontrolling Interest 23,891 28,380
Total Equity 5,421,052 5,790,183
Total Liabilities and Equity $ 21,830,064 $ 18,875,600
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
TSR, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Years Ended May 31, 2021 and 2020
Revenue, net $ 68,821,217 $ 59,121,401
Cost of sales 57,500,303 49,943,405
Selling, general and administrative expenses 11,808,950 10,928,648
69,309,253 60,872,053
Loss from operations (488,036 ) (1,750,652 )
Other income (expense):
Interest and dividend income 14,991 4,877
Interest expense (208,392 ) (79,386 )
Unrealized gain (loss) from marketable securities, net (4,648 ) 15,112
(198,049 ) (59,397 )
Loss before income taxes (686,085 ) (1,810,049 )
Benefit from income taxes (109,000 ) (712,000 )
Consolidated net loss (577,085 ) (1,098,049 )
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest 23,889 28,379
Net loss attributable to TSR, Inc. $ (600,974 ) $ (1,126,428 )
Basic net loss per TSR, Inc. common share $ (0.31 ) $ (0.57 )
Basic weighted average number of common shares outstanding 1,962,062 1,962,062
Diluted net loss per TSR, Inc. common share $ (0.31 ) $ (0.57 )
Diluted weighted average number of common shares outstanding 1,962,062 1,962,062
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
TSR, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY
Years Ended May 31, 2021 and 2020
Shares of
common
stock Common
stock Additional
paid-in
capital Retained
earnings Treasury
stock TSR, Inc.
equity Non-
controlling interest Total
equity
Balance at June 1, 2019 3,114,163 $ 31,142 $ 5,102,868 $ 15,268,224 $ (13,514,003 ) $ 6,888,231 $ 28,792 $ 6,917,023
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest - - - - - - 28,379 28,379
Distribution to noncontrolling interest - - - - - - (28,791 ) (28,791 )
Net loss attributable to TSR, Inc. - - - (1,126,428 ) - (1,126,428 ) - (1,126,428 )
Balance at May 31, 2020 3,114,163 31,142 5,102,868 14,141,796 (13,514,003 ) 5,761,803 28,380 5,790,183
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest - - - - - - 23,889 23,889
Distribution to noncontrolling interest - - - - - - (28,378 ) (28,378 )
Non-cash stock compensation - - 236,332 - - 236,332 - 236,332
Net loss attributable to TSR, Inc. - - - (600,974 ) - (600,974 ) - (600,974 )
Balance at May 31, 2021 3,114,163 $ 31,142 $ 5,339,200 $ 13,540,822 $ (13,514,003 ) $ 5,397,161 $ 23,891 $ 5,421,052
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
TSR, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Years Ended May 31, 2021 and 2020
Cash flows from operating activities:
Consolidated net loss $ (577,085 ) $ (1,098,049 )
Adjustments to reconcile consolidated net loss to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization 158,154 7,787
Unrealized (gain) loss from marketable securities, net 4,648 (15,112 )
Non-cash right-of-use asset impairment charge 136,599 -
Non-cash lease (recovery) expense (19,098 ) 4,026
Non-cash stock-based compensation expense 236,332 -
Deferred income taxes (157,000 ) (148,000 )
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable-trade (1,824,447 ) 386,216
Other receivables (27,420 )
Prepaid expenses (45,583 ) (84,380 )
Prepaid and recoverable income taxes 590,222 (546,508 )
Other assets 1,990 -
Accounts and other payables and accrued expenses and other current liabilities 2,797,809 (892,309 )
Legal settlement payable 39,287 827,822
Advances from customers (10,734 ) (8,780 )
Net cash provided by (used) in operating activities 1,303,674 (1,567,054 )
Cash flows from investing activities:
Proceeds from maturities of marketable securities - 492,000
Purchase of Geneva Consulting Group, Inc., net of cash acquired of $241,946 (3,100,114 ) -
Purchases of equipment and leasehold improvements (125,951 ) (21,476 )
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities (3,226,065 ) 470,524
Cash flows from financing activities:
Net drawings (repayments) on Credit Facility (408,607 ) 501,134
Proceeds from SBA Paycheck Protection Program loan - 6,659,220
Distributions to noncontrolling interest (28,378 ) (28,791 )
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities (436,985 ) 7,131,563
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents (2,359,376 ) 6,035,033
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year 9,730,022 3,694,989
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year $ 7,370,646 $ 9,730,022
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow data:
Income taxes paid $ 45,000 $ 30,000
Non-cash investing and financing activities:
Right-of-use asset and operating lease liability $ 846,000 $ -
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
TSR, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
May 31, 2021 and 2020
(1) Summary of Business and Significant Accounting Policies
(a) Business, Nature of Operations and Customer Concentrations
TSR, Inc. and Subsidiaries (the “Company,” “TSR,” “we,” “us” and “our”) are primarily engaged in providing contract computer programming services to commercial customers located primarily in the Metropolitan New York area. The Company provides its customers with technical computer personnel to supplement their in-house information technology (“IT”) capabilities. In addition, beginning in fiscal 2017, the Company has provided and continues to provide administrative (non-IT) workers on a contract basis to some of its significant customers, including new customers acquired following the Geneva acquisition. In fiscal 2021, three customers each accounted for more than 10% of the Company’s consolidated revenue, constituting a combined 54.3%. The largest of these constituted 22.4% of consolidated revenue. In fiscal 2020, three customers each accounted for more than 10% of the Company’s consolidated revenue, constituting a combined 53.3%. The largest of these constituted 21.2% of consolidated revenue. The accounts receivable balances associated with the Company’s largest customers were $4,585,000 for three customers at May 31, 2021 and $3,747,000 for three customers at May 31, 2020. The Company operates in one business segment, contract staffing services.
(b) Principles of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of TSR and its subsidiaries. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
(c) Revenue Recognition
Revenues are recognized as control of the promised service is transferred to customers, in an amount that reflects the consideration expected in exchange for the services. Revenues from contract assignments are recognized over time, based on hours worked by the Company’s contract professionals. The performance of the requested service over time is the single performance obligation for assignment revenues. Certain customers may receive discounts (e.g., volume discounts, rebates, prompt-pay discounts) and adjustments to the amounts billed. These discounts, rebates and adjustments are considered variable consideration. Volume discounts are the largest component of variable consideration and are estimated using the most likely amount method prescribed by Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 606, contracts terms and estimates of revenue. Revenues are recognized net of variable consideration to the extent that it is probable that a significant reversal of revenues will not occur in subsequent periods. Payment terms vary and the time between invoicing and when payment is due is not significant. There are no financing components to the Company’s arrangements. There are no incremental costs to obtain contracts and costs to fulfill contracts are expensed as incurred. The Company’s operations are primarily located in the United States.
The Company recognizes most of its revenue on a gross basis when it acts as a principal in its transactions. The Company has direct contractual relationships with its customers, bears the risks and rewards of its arrangements, and has the discretion to select the contract professionals and establish the price for the services to be provided. Additionally, the Company retains control over its contract professionals based on its contractual arrangements. The Company primarily provides services through its employees and to a lesser extent, through subcontractors; the related costs are included in cost of sales. The Company includes billable expenses (out-of-pocket reimbursable expenses) in revenue and the associated expenses are included in cost of sales.
(d) Cash and Cash Equivalents
The Company considers short-term highly liquid investments with maturities of three months or less at the time of purchase to be cash equivalents. Cash and cash equivalents were comprised of the following as of May 31, 2021 and 2020:
Cash in banks $ 7,317,517 $ 9,677,848
Money market funds 53,129 52,174
$ 7,370,646 $ 9,730,022
(Continued)
TSR, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, Continued
May 31, 2021 and 2020
(e) Marketable Securities
The Company has characterized its investments in marketable securities, based on the priority of the inputs used to value the investments, into a three-level fair value hierarchy. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1), and lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3). If the inputs used to measure the investments fall within different levels of the hierarchy, the categorization is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement of the instrument.
Investments recorded in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets are categorized based on the inputs to valuation techniques as follows:
Level 1- These are investments where values are based on unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets in an active market the Company has the ability to access.
Level 2- These are investments where values are based on quoted market prices that are not active or model derived valuations in which all significant inputs are observable in active markets.
Level 3- These are investments where values are derived from techniques in which one or more significant inputs are unobservable.
The following are the major categories of assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of May 31, 2021 and 2020 using quoted prices in active markets for identical assets (Level 1), significant other observable inputs (Level 2), and significant unobservable inputs (Level 3):
May 31, 2021 Level Level Level Total
Equity Securities $ 45,696 $ - $ - $ 45,696
May 31, 2020 Level Level Level Total
Equity Securities $ 50,344 $ - $ - $ 50,344
The Company’s equity securities are classified as trading securities, which are carried at fair value, as determined by quoted market prices, which is a Level 1 input, as established by the fair value hierarchy. The related unrealized gains and losses are included in earnings. The Company’s marketable securities at May 31, 2021 and 2020 are summarized as follows:
May 31, 2021 Amortized
Cost Gross
Unrealized
Holding
Gains Gross
Unrealized
Holding
Losses Recorded
Value
Equity Securities $ 16,866 $ 28,830 $ - $ 45,696
May 31, 2020
Equity Securities $ 16,866 $ 33,478 $ - $ 50,344
The Company’s investments in marketable securities consist primarily of investments in equity securities. Market values were determined for each individual security in the investment portfolio. When evaluating the investments for other-than-temporary impairment, the Company reviews factors such as length of time and extent to which fair value has been below cost basis, the financial condition of the issuer, and the Company’s ability and intent to hold the investment for a period of time, which may be sufficient for anticipated recovery in market values.
(Continued)
TSR, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, Continued
May 31, 2021 and 2020
(f) Accounts Receivable and Credit Policies
The carrying amount of accounts receivable is reduced by a valuation allowance that reflects management’s best estimate of the amounts that will not be collected. In addition to reviewing delinquent accounts receivable, management considers many factors in estimating its general allowance, including historical data, experience, customer types, creditworthiness and economic trends. From time to time, management may adjust its assumptions for anticipated changes in any of those or other factors expected to affect collectability.
(g) Depreciation and Amortization
Depreciation and amortization of equipment and leasehold improvements has been computed using the straight-line method over the following useful lives:
Equipment years
Furniture and fixtures years
Automobiles years
Leasehold improvements Lesser of lease term or useful life
(h) Net Loss Per Common Share
Basic net loss per common share is computed by dividing net loss available to common stockholders of TSR by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the reporting period, excluding the effects of any potentially dilutive securities. During the fiscal year ended May 31, 2021, the Company granted time and performance vesting stock awards under its 2020 Equity Incentive Plan (see Note 15 for further information). Diluted earnings per share gives effect to all potentially dilutive common shares outstanding during the reporting period. The common stock equivalents associated with these stock awards of 78,901 in the fiscal year ended May 31, 2021 have not been included for dilutive shares outstanding for the fiscal year May 31, 2021 since the effect would be anti-dilutive due to the net loss incurred for the period. The Company had no stock options or other potentially dilutive securities outstanding during the fiscal year ended May 31, 2020.
(i) Income Taxes
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to temporary differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of the Company’s assets and liabilities at enacted rates expected to be in effect when such amounts are realized or settled. The effect of enacted tax law or rate changes is reflected in income in the period of enactment.
(j) Fair Value of Financial Instruments
ASC 820-10, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (“ASC 820-10”), defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) and provides for expanded disclosure about fair value measurements. ASC 820-10 applies to all other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements.
The Company determines or calculates the fair value of financial instruments using quoted market prices in active markets when such information is available or using appropriate present value or other valuation techniques, such as discounted cash flow analyses, incorporating available market discount rate information for similar types of instruments while estimating for non-performance and liquidity risk. These techniques are significantly affected by the assumptions used, including the discount rate, credit spreads and estimates of future cash flows.
(Continued)
TSR, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, Continued
May 31, 2021 and 2020
Assets and liabilities typically recorded at fair value on a non-recurring basis to which ASC 820-10 applies include:
● non-financial assets and liabilities initially measured at fair value in an acquisition or business combination, and
● long-lived assets measured at fair value due to an impairment assessment under ASC 360-10-15, Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets.
This topic defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date and establishes a three-level hierarchy, which encourages an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. ASC 820-10 requires that assets and liabilities recorded at fair value be classified and disclosed in one of the following three categories:
● Level 1 - inputs utilize quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Company has the ability to access.
● Level 2 - inputs utilize other-than-quoted prices that are observable, either directly or indirectly. Level 2 inputs include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, and inputs such as interest rates and yield curves that are observable at commonly quoted intervals.
● Level 3 - inputs are unobservable and are typically based on the Company’s own assumptions, including situations where there is little, if any, market activity. Both observable and unobservable inputs may be used to determine the fair value of positions that are classified within the Level 3 classification.
In certain cases, the inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy. In such cases, the Company classifies such financial assets or liabilities based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. The Company’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment and considers factors specific to the asset or liability.
ASC Topic 825, Financial Instruments, requires disclosure of the fair value of certain financial instruments. For cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts and other payables, accrued liabilities and advances from customers, the amounts presented in the consolidated financial statements approximate fair value because of the short-term maturities of these instruments.
(k) Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Such estimates include, but are not limited to, provisions for doubtful accounts receivable and assessments of the recoverability of the Company’s deferred tax assets. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
(l) Long-Lived Assets
The Company reviews its long-lived assets for possible impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. If the sum of the expected cash flows undiscounted and without interest is less than the carrying amount of the asset, an impairment loss is recognized for the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds its fair value.
(Continued)
TSR, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, Continued
May 31, 2021 and 2020
(m) Impact of New Accounting Standards
Effective June 1, 2019, the Company adopted Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2016-02, Leases, which sets out the principle for the recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of leases for both parties to a contract (i.e., lessees and lessors). The new standard requires lessees to classify leases as either finance or operating leases and record a right-of-use asset and a lease liability for all leases with a term of greater than 12 months regardless of their classification. An accounting policy election may be made to account for leases with a term of 12 months or less similar to existing guidance for operating leases today. ASU No. 2016-02 supersedes the existing guidance on accounting for leases. In July 2018, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued ASU No. 2018-11, Leases (Topic 842): Targeted Improvements, which allows for an optional transition method for the adoption of Topic 842. The two permitted transition methods are now the modified retrospective approach, which applies the new lease requirements at the beginning of the earliest period presented, and the optional transition method, which applies the new lease requirements through a cumulative-effect adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings in the period of adoption. ASU 2016-02 is effective for our fiscal year ended May 31, 2020 and the interim periods within that year. The Company adopted this standard in the first quarter of fiscal 2020 using the optional transition method. The Company also elected the practical expedients that allow us to carry forward the historical lease classification. The Company has established an inventory of existing leases and implemented a new process of evaluating the classification of each lease. The financial impact of the adoption of the new standard at June 1, 2019 increased total assets and total liabilities by approximately $690,000. The financial impact of the adoption primarily relates to the capitalization of right-of-use assets and recognition of lease liabilities related to operating leases.
(n) Credit Risk
Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents, certificates of deposit, marketable securities and accounts receivable. The Company places its cash equivalents with high-credit quality financial institutions and brokerage houses. The Company has substantially all of its cash in four bank accounts. At times, such amounts may exceed federally insured limits. The Company holds its marketable securities in brokerage accounts. The Company has not experienced losses in any such accounts. As a percentage of revenue, the three largest customers consisted of 54.3% of the net accounts receivable balance at May 31, 2021.
(2) Income Taxes
A reconciliation of the provision for income taxes computed at the federal statutory rates of 21.0% for fiscal 2021 and fiscal 2020 to the reported amounts is as follows:
Amount % Amount %
Amounts at statutory federal tax rate $ (144,000 ) (21.0 )% $ (380,000 ) (21.0 )%
Noncontrolling interest (5,000 ) (0.7 ) (6,000 ) (0.3 )
State and local taxes, net of federal income tax effect (23,000 ) (3.4 ) (147,000 ) (8.1 )
Federal benefit of state NOL 50,000 7.3 - -
Benefit of NOL at higher federal rate - - (202,000 ) (11.2 )
Non-deductible expenses and other 13,000 1.9 23,000 1.3
$ (109,000 ) (15.9 )% $ (712,000 ) (39.3 )%
(Continued)
TSR, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, Continued
May 31, 2021 and 2020
The components of the provision for income taxes are as follows:
Federal State Total
2021:
Current $ - $ 48,000 $ 48,000
Deferred (96,000 ) (61,000 ) (157,000 )
$ (96,000 ) $ (13,000 ) $ (109,000 )
2020:
Current $ (586,000 ) $ 22,000 $ (564,000 )
Deferred 16,000 (164,000 ) (148,000 )
$ (570,000 ) $ (142,000 ) $ (712,000 )
The tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to significant portions of the deferred income tax assets at May 31, 2021 and 2020 are as follows:
Allowance for doubtful accounts receivable $ 52,000 $ 52,000
Accrued compensation and other accrued expenses 26,000 23,000
Net operating loss carryforwards 421,000 487,000
Equipment and leasehold improvement depreciation and amortization (32,000 ) (3,000 )
Unrealized gain (8,000 ) (10,000 )
Legal settlement with investor 275,000 233,000
Non-cash stock compensation 70,000 -
Non-cash lease expense 36,000 -
Accumulated amortization 95,000 -
Other items, net 6,000 2,000
Total deferred income tax assets $ 941,000 $ 784,000
The Company believes that it is more likely than not that it will realize the benefits of its deferred tax assets based primarily on the Company’s history of and projections for taxable income in the future. The federal net operating loss carryforwards may be used indefinitely, and the state carryforwards are generally usable for 20 years.
The Company recognizes interest and penalties associated with tax matters as selling, general and administrative expenses and includes accrued interest and penalties with accrued and other liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets.
On March 27, 2020, the CARES Act was signed into law in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. The CARES Act provides numerous tax provisions and stimulus measures, including temporary changes regarding the prior and future utilization of net operating losses, temporary changes to the prior and future limitations on interest deductions, and technical corrections from prior tax legislation for tax depreciation of certain qualified improvement property. The Company has evaluated the provisions of the CARES Act relating to income taxes which resulted in the ability to carryback net operating losses and file for a federal tax refund of approximately $586,000 which was recorded in the May 31, 2020 consolidated balance sheet. The amount was subsequently collected in April 2021.
In the third quarter of fiscal 2018, the Company discovered it had not filed required information returns related to a foreign bank account opened by a subsidiary in fiscal 2016 with contributions totaling approximately $25,000. The Company accrued an expense of $30,000 with a charge to selling, general and administrative expenses for potential penalties that may be assessed. The Company monitored this reserve periodically to determine if it was more-likely-than-not that penalties will be assessed. The reserve was reversed in fiscal 2021 due to the expiration of the statute of limitations on the returns.
(Continued)
TSR, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, Continued
May 31, 2021 and 2020
A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefit as follows:
Balance at beginning of fiscal year $ 30,000 $ 30,000
Additions based on tax positions related to current year - -
Additions for tax positions of prior years - -
Reductions for tax positions of prior years (30,000 ) -
Settlements - -
Balance at end of fiscal year $ - $ 30,000
The Company’s federal and state income tax returns prior to fiscal year 2018 are closed.
(3) Leases
The Company leases the space for its three offices in New York City, Hauppauge and New Jersey. Under ASC 842, at contract inception we determine whether the contract is or contains a lease and whether the lease should be classified as an operating or finance lease. Operating leases are in right-of-use assets and operating lease liabilities in our consolidated balance sheets.
The Company’s leases for its three offices are classified as operating leases.
The lease agreements for New York City, Hauppauge and New Jersey expire on August 31, 2022, December 31, 2023 and May 31, 2027, respectively, and do not include any renewal options. During the fiscal year ended May 31, 2021, the Company extended its lease in Hauppauge, entered into a lease in a new location for its New Jersey office, and entered into a sublease agreement for the remainder of the lease in New York City. Due to the fact that the future sublease lease cash inflows will be less than the carrying value of the corresponding right-of-use asset, the Company recorded a right-of-use asset impairment charge of $136,599 in the quarter ended November 30, 2020.
In addition to the monthly base amounts in the lease agreements, the Company is required to pay real estate taxes and operating expenses during the lease terms.
For the fiscal years ended May 31, 2021 and 2020, the Company’s operating lease expense for these leases was $385,000 and $417,000.
Future minimum lease payments under non-cancelable operating leases as of May 31, 2021 were as follows:
Twelve Months Ended May 31,
$ 371,155
256,605
179,035
123,840
126,936
Thereafter
130,109
Total undiscounted operating lease payments 1,187,680
Less imputed interest 170,580
Present value of operating lease payments $ 1,017,100
(Continued)
TSR, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, Continued
May 31, 2021 and 2020
The following table sets forth the right-of-use assets and operating lease liabilities as of May 31, 2021:
Assets
Right-of-use assets $ 895,573
Liabilities
Current operating lease liabilities $ 309,731
Long-term operating lease liabilities 707,369
Total operating lease liabilities $ 1,017,100
The weighted average remaining lease term for the Company’s operating leases is 3.3 years.
(4) Credit Facility
On November 27, 2019, TSR closed on the Credit Facility pursuant to a Loan and Security Agreement with the Lender that initially provided up to $7,000,000 in funding to TSR and its direct and indirect subsidiaries, TSR Consulting Services, Inc., Logixtech Solutions, LLC and Eurologix, S.A.R.L., each of which, together with TSR, is a borrower under the Credit Facility. Each of the borrowers has provided a security interest to the Lender in all of their respective assets to secure amounts borrowed under the Credit Facility.
TSR expects to utilize the Credit Facility for working capital and general corporate purposes. TSR had also expected to utilize the Credit Facility to complete the Repurchase (as defined below) and make the Settlement Payment (as defined below); however, TSR did not complete the Repurchase and make the Settlement Payment prior to the December 30, 2019 deadline established in the Credit Facility for such use.
Because TSR did not complete the Repurchase and make the Settlement Payment prior to the December 30, 2019 deadline, the maximum amount that may now be advanced under the Credit Facility at any time shall not exceed $2,000,000.
Advances under the Credit Facility accrue interest at a rate per annum equal to (x) the “base rate” or “prime rate” announced by Citibank, N.A. from time to time, which shall be increased or decreased, as the case may be, in an amount equal to each increase or decrease in such “base rate” or “prime rate,” plus (y) 1.75%. The prime rate as of May 31, 2021 was 3.25%, indicating an interest rate of 5.0% on the Credit Facility. The initial term of the Credit Facility is 5 years, which shall automatically renew for successive 5-year periods unless either TSR or the Lender gives written notice to the other of termination at least 60 days prior to the expiration date of the then-current term.
TSR is obliged to satisfy certain financial covenants and minimum borrowing requirements under the Credit Facility, and to pay certain fees, including prepayment fees, and provide certain financial information to the Lender.
As of May 31, 2021, the net borrowings outstanding against this Credit Facility were $92,527. The amount the Company has borrowed fluctuates and, at times, it has utilized the maximum amount of $2,000,000 available under the facility to fund its payroll and other obligations.
(Continued)
TSR, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, Continued
May 31, 2021 and 2020
(5) Legal Settlement with Investor
On April 1, 2020, the Company entered into a binding term sheet (“Term Sheet”) with Zeff Capital, L.P. (“Zeff”) pursuant to which it agreed to pay Zeff an amount of $900,000 over a period of three years in cash or cash and stock in settlement of expenses incurred by Zeff during its solicitations in 2018 and 2019 in connection with the annual meetings of the Company, the costs incurred in connection with the litigation initiated by and against the Company as well as negotiation, execution and enforcement of the Settlement and Release Agreement, dated as of August 30, 2019, by and between the Company, Zeff and certain other parties (See Note 7). In exchange for certain releases, the Term Sheet calls for a cash payment of $300,000 on June 30, 2021, a second cash payment of $300,000 on June 30, 2022 and a third payment of $300,000 also on June 30, 2022, which can be paid in cash or common stock at the Company’s option. There is no interest due on these payments. The $300,000 payment due on June 30, 2021 was paid subsequent to the end of the fiscal year. The agreement also has protections to defer such payment dates so that the debt covenants with the Company’s Lender are not breached. On August 13, 2020, the Company, Zeff, Zeff Holding Company, LLC and Daniel Zeff entered into a settlement agreement to reflect these terms. Any installment payment which is deferred as permitted above will accrue interest at the prime rate plus 3.75%, and Zeff shall thereby have the option to convert such deferred amounts (plus accrued interest if any) into shares of the Company’s stock. The Company accrued $818,000, the estimated present value of these payments using an effective interest rate of 5%, in the quarter ended February 29, 2020, as the events relating to the expense occurred prior to such date. The estimated present value of these payments is $867,000 at May 31, 2021.
(6) Equity
Rights Plan / Preferred Stock
Amended and Restated Rights Agreement
On August 29, 2018, the Board of Directors of the Company declared a dividend of one preferred share purchase right (a “Right”) for each share of common stock, par value $0.01 per share (“Common Stock”), of the Company outstanding on August 29, 2018 to the stockholders of record on that date. In connection with the distribution of the Rights, the Company entered into a Rights Agreement, dated as of August 29, 2018, between the Company and Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company, as “Rights Agent”. Each Right entitled the registered holder to purchase from the Company one one-hundredth of a share of Class A Preferred Stock, Series One, par value $0.01 per share (“Preferred Stock”), of the Company at a price of $24.78 per one one-hundredth of a share of Preferred Stock represented by a Right, subject to adjustment.
On August 30, 2019, the Company entered into a settlement and release agreement (the “Settlement Agreement”) with Zeff Capital, L.P., Zeff Holding Company, LLC, Daniel Zeff, QAR Industries, Inc., Robert Fitzgerald, Fintech Consulting LLC and Tajuddin Haslani (collectively, the “Investor Parties”), pursuant to which the Company agreed to, among other things, amend and restate the Rights Agreement to provide that a “Distribution Date” (as defined below) shall not occur as a result of any request by any of the Investor Parties calling for a special meeting pursuant to Article II, Section 5 of the Amended and Restated By-Laws of the Company in accordance with the terms of the Settlement Agreement (See Note 7, “Other Matters.”). Pursuant to the Settlement Agreement, the Company amended and restated the Rights Agreement on September 3, 2019 (the “A&R Rights Agreement”) to confirm that a Distribution Date (as defined in the A&R Rights Agreement) shall not occur as a result of any request by any of the Investor Parties for a special meeting of the Company’s stockholders.
First Amendment to A&R Rights Agreement
On January 5, 2021, the disinterested members of the Board of Directors of the Company approved a waiver for QAR Industries, Inc. to complete its proposed acquisition of shares owned by Fintech Consulting LLC (the “Acquisition”) under the Company’s A&R Rights Agreement so that a Distribution Date would not occur as a result of the Acquisition. On February 4, 2021, the Company entered into that certain First Amendment to the A&R Rights Agreement with the Rights Agent, which provides that a distribution date shall not occur as a result of the Acquisition.
(Continued)
TSR, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, Continued
May 31, 2021 and 2020
Second Amendment to A&R Rights Agreement and Termination of A&R Rights Agreement as of March 31, 2021
At the Company’s combined 2019 and 2020 annual meeting of stockholders held on November 19, 2020, the Company’s stockholders approved an advisory vote to terminate the Company’s A&R Rights Agreement no later than March 31, 2021. On March 31, 2021, the Company entered into that certain Second Amendment to A&R Rights Agreement with the Rights Agent, pursuant to which the Expiration Date was advanced from August 29, 2021 to March 31, 2021. As a result of this amendment, effective as of the close of business on March 31, 2021, the Rights expired and are no longer outstanding and the A&R Rights Agreement was terminated by its terms.
Following the expiration of the Rights and the termination of the A&R Rights Agreement on April 1, 2021, the Company filed a Certificate of Elimination (the “Certificate of Elimination”) with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware eliminating the Class A Preferred Shares and returning them to be authorized but unissued and non-designated shares of the Company’s preferred stock.
(7) Other Matters
From time to time, the Company is party to various lawsuits, some involving material amounts. Except for the litigation disclosed below, management is not aware of any lawsuits that would have a material adverse impact on the consolidated financial position of the Company.
Paskowitz Stockholder Litigation
On October 16, 2018, the Company was served with a complaint filed on October 11, 2018 in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Queens County, by Susan Paskowitz, a stockholder of the Company, against the Company; Joseph F. Hughes and Winifred M. Hughes; former directors Christopher Hughes, Raymond A. Roel, Brian J. Mangan, Regina Dowd, James J. Hill, William Kelly, and Eric Stein; as well as stockholders Zeff Capital, L.P., QAR Industries, Inc. and Fintech Consulting LLC (the “Stockholder Litigation”). The complaint purported to be a class action lawsuit asserting claims on behalf of all minority stockholders of the Company. Ms. Paskowitz alleged the following: the sale by Joseph F. Hughes and Winifred M. Hughes of an aggregate of 819,491 shares of the Company’s common stock (“controlling interest”) to Zeff Capital, L.P., QAR Industries, Inc. and Fintech Consulting LLC was in breach of Joseph F. Hughes’ and Winifred M. Hughes’ fiduciary duties and to the detriment of the Company’s minority stockholders; the former members of the Board of Directors of the Company named in the complaint breached their fiduciary duties by failing to immediately adopt a rights plan that would have prevented Joseph F. Hughes and Winifred M. Hughes from selling their shares and preserved a higher premium for all stockholders; Zeff Capital, L.P., QAR Industries, Inc. and Fintech Consulting LLC Zeff, QAR, and Fintech are “partners” and constitute a “group.” Ms. Paskowitz also asserted that Zeff Capital, L.P., QAR Industries, Inc. and Fintech Consulting LLC aided and abetted Joseph F. Hughes’ and Winifred M. Hughes’ conduct, and ultimately sought to buy out the remaining shares of the Company at an unfair price.
On June 14, 2019, Ms. Paskowitz filed an amended complaint in the Stockholder Litigation in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Queens County with the court against the former members of the Board of Directors and Zeff Capital, L.P., QAR Industries, Inc. and Fintech Consulting LLC, which asserted substantially similar allegations to those contained in the October 11, 2018 complaint, but omitted Regina Dowd, Joseph F. Hughes and Winifred M. Hughes as defendants. In addition to the former members of the Board of Directors named in the original complaint, the amended complaint named former directors Ira Cohen, Joseph Pennacchio, and William Kelly as defendants. The amended complaint also asserted a derivative claim purportedly on behalf of the Company against the named former members of the Board of Directors. The amended complaint sought declaratory judgment and unspecified monetary damages. The complaint requested: (1) a declaration from the court that the former members of the Board of Directors named in the complaint breached their fiduciary duties by failing to timely adopt a stockholder rights plan, which resulted in the loss of the ability to auction the Company off to the highest bidder without interference from Zeff Capital, L.P., QAR Industries, Inc. and Fintech Consulting LLC; (2) damages derivatively on behalf of the Company for unspecified harm caused by the named Directors’ alleged breaches of fiduciary duties; (3) damages and equitable relief derivatively on behalf of the Company for the named Directors’ alleged failure to adopt proper corporate governance practices; and (4) damages and injunctive relief against Zeff Capital, L.P., QAR Industries, Inc. and Fintech Consulting LLC based on their knowing dissemination of false or misleading public statements concerning their status as a group. The complaint did not assign any monetary values to alleged damages.
(Continued)
TSR, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, Continued
May 31, 2021 and 2020
On July 15, 2019, the Company filed an answer to the amended complaint in the Stockholder Litigation and cross-claims against Zeff Capital, L.P., QAR Industries, Inc. and Fintech Consulting LLC for breaches of their fiduciary duties, aiding and abetting breaches of fiduciary duties, and indemnification and contribution based on their misappropriation of material nonpublic information and their failure to disclose complete and accurate information in SEC filings concerning their group actions to attempt a creeping takeover of the Company, which was thereafter amended on July 26, 2019.
On December 21, 2018, the Company filed a complaint in the United States District Court, Southern District of New York, against Zeff Capital, L.P., Zeff Holding Company, LLC, Daniel Zeff, QAR Industries, Inc., Robert Fitzgerald, Fintech Consulting LLC, and Tajuddin Haslani for violations of the disclosure and anti-fraud requirements of the federal securities laws under Sections 13(d) and 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”), and the related rules and regulations promulgated by the SEC, for failing to disclose to the Company and its stockholders their formation of a group and the group’s intention to seize control of the Company (the “SDNY Action”). The complaint requested that the court, among other things, declare that the defendants have solicited proxies without filing timely, accurate and complete reports on Schedule 13D and Schedule 14A in violation of Sections 13(d) and 14(a) of the Exchange Act, direct the defendants to file with the SEC complete and accurate disclosures, enjoin the defendants from voting any of their shares prior to such time as complete and accurate disclosures have been filed, and enjoin the defendants from further violations of the Exchange Act with respect to the securities of the Company.
On January 7, 2019, Ms. Paskowitz filed a related action against Zeff Capital, L.P., Zeff Holding Company, LLC, Daniel Zeff, QAR Industries, Inc., Robert Fitzgerald, Fintech Consulting LLC, and Tajuddin Haslani in the Southern District of New York, which asserted claims against them for breach of fiduciary duty and under federal securities laws similar to those asserted in the Company’s action. Although the Company is not a party to Ms. Paskowitz’s action, the court has determined to treat the Company’s and Ms. Paskowitz’s respective actions as related.
On August 7, 2019, following the Company’s initial rescheduling of the 2018 Annual Meeting for September 13, 2019 and the filing of Preliminary Proxy Statements by the Company and Zeff Capital, L.P., Zeff Capital, L.P. filed a complaint in the Delaware Court of Chancery against the Company seeking an order requiring the Company to hold its next annual meeting of stockholders on or around September 13, 2019, and obligating the Company to elect Class I and Class III directors at that annual meeting.
On August 13, 2019, the Company filed a motion for preliminary injunction in the SDNY Action in advance of the Company’s 2018 Annual Meeting originally scheduled for September 13, 2019, and requested leave to file a motion for expedited discovery. The Court denied the Company’s motion for preliminary injunction but ordered Zeff to “make clear that the second set of directors” described by Zeff in its preliminary proxy statement “is contingent upon the resolution of a proceeding in Delaware Chancery Court.”
On August 30, 2019, the Company entered into a settlement and release agreement (the “Settlement Agreement”) with Zeff Capital, L.P., Zeff Holding Company, LLC, Daniel Zeff, QAR Industries, Inc., Robert Fitzgerald, Fintech Consulting LLC and Tajuddin Haslani (collectively, the “Investor Parties”) with respect to the proxy contest pertaining to the election of directors at the 2018 Annual Meeting, which was held on October 22, 2019. Pursuant to the Settlement Agreement, the parties agreed to forever settle and resolve any and all disputes between the parties, including without limitation disputes arising out of or relating to the following litigations:
(i) The complaint relating to alleged breaches of fiduciary duties filed on November 1, 2018 by Fintech Consulting LLC against the Company in the Delaware Court of Chancery, which was previously dismissed voluntarily;
(ii) The complaint for declaratory and injunctive relief for violations of the federal securities laws filed on December 21, 2018 by the Company against the Investor Parties in the United States District Court in the Southern District of New York;
(iii) Cross-claims relating to alleged breaches of fiduciary duties and for indemnification and contribution filed on July 26, 2019 by the Company against the Investor Parties in New York Supreme Court, Queens County; and
(iv) The complaint to compel annual meeting of stockholders filed on August 7, 2019 by Zeff Capital, L.P. against the Company in the Delaware Court of Chancery.
(Continued)
TSR, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, Continued
May 31, 2021 and 2020
No party admitted any liability by entering into the Settlement Agreement. The Settlement Agreement did not resolve the Stockholder Litigation filed by Susan Paskowitz against the Company, Joseph F. Hughes, Winifred M. Hughes and certain former directors of the Company in the Supreme Court of the State of New York on October 11, 2018.
Concurrently with the Settlement Agreement, the parties entered into a share repurchase agreement (the “Repurchase Agreement”) which provided for the purchase by the Company and Christopher Hughes, the Company’s former President and Chief Executive Officer, of the shares of the Company’s Common Stock held by the Investor Parties (the “Repurchase”). The Settlement Agreement also contemplated that, if the Repurchase was completed, the Company would make a settlement payment to the Investor Parties at the closing of the Repurchase in an amount of approximately $1,500,000 (the “Settlement Payment”). However, the Repurchase and Settlement Payment were not completed by the deadline of December 30, 2019.
Pursuant to the Settlement Agreement, (1) the Company agreed to adopt an amendment to the Company’s Amended and Restated By-Laws, dated April 9, 2015 (the “By-Laws Amendment”), providing that stockholders of the Company owning at least forty percent (40%) of the issued and outstanding Common Stock may request a special meeting of stockholders; (2) the Investor Parties agreed not to take any action to call or otherwise cause a special meeting of stockholders to occur prior to December 30, 2019 (unless the Company had failed to hold the 2018 Annual Meeting); (3) the Company agreed to amend and restate the Company’s Rights Agreement, dated August 29, 2018 (the “Amended Rights Agreement”), to confirm that a Distribution Date (as defined in the Amended Rights Agreement) shall not occur as a result of any request by any of the Investor Parties for a special meeting; (4) the Company agreed that prior to the earlier of (A) the completion of the Repurchase and the payment of the Settlement Payment and (B) January 1, 2020, the Board of Directors shall not consist of more than seven (7) directors.
Pursuant to the terms of the Settlement Agreement, the two nominees for director made by Zeff Capital, L.P. were elected as directors at the Company’s 2018 Annual Meeting held on October 22, 2019. Please see the Company’s current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on October 21, 2019 for more information about the background of the election of directors at the Company’s 2018 Annual Meeting.
Pursuant to the terms of the Settlement Agreement, inasmuch as the Repurchase was not completed and the Settlement Payment was not made by December 30, 2019, the members of the Board of Directors (other than the two directors who were nominated by Zeff Capital, L.P. and elected as directors at the 2018 Annual Meeting) resigned from the Board effective 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on December 30, 2019. Immediately thereafter, the two remaining directors appointed Robert Fitzgerald to the Board of Directors. Please see the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on December 31, 2019 for more information about the background and the appointment of Robert Fitzgerald.
The foregoing is not a complete description of the terms of the Settlement Agreement and the Share Repurchase Agreement. For a further description of the terms of the Settlement Agreement and the Share Repurchase Agreement, including copies of the Settlement Agreement and Share Repurchase Agreement, please see the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed by the Company with the SEC on September 3, 2019.
On October 21, 2019, the Company entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (the “MOU”) with Susan Paskowitz providing for the settlement of the Stockholder Litigation filed by Ms. Paskowitz on October 11, 2018. The MOU provides for the settlement of the claims by Ms. Paskowitz that (1) the members of the Board named in the original complaint allegedly breached their fiduciary duties by failing to immediately adopt a rights plan that would have prevented the sale by Joseph F. Hughes and Winifred M. Hughes of an aggregate of 819,491 shares of the Company’s common stock to the Investor Parties; (2) the members of the Board named in the amended complaint allegedly breached their fiduciary duties and failed to adopt proper corporate governance practices; and (3) the Investor Parties acted as “partners” and constituted a “group” in their purchase of shares from Joseph F. Hughes and Winifred M. Hughes and knowingly disseminated false or misleading public statements concerning their status as a group.
Pursuant to the terms of the MOU, the Company will (1) implement certain corporate governance reforms described in the MOU within 30 days of a final order and judgment entered by the court, and keep these corporate governance reforms in place for 5 years from the time of the final order and judgment; and (2) acknowledge that the plaintiff, Ms. Paskowitz, and her counsel provided a substantial benefit to the Company and its stockholders through the prosecution of the Stockholder Litigation and other related actions filed by Ms. Paskowitz described above.
(Continued)
TSR, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, Continued
May 31, 2021 and 2020
On December 16, 2019, the Company entered into a Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement (the “Stipulation”) with Susan Paskowitz in the Stockholder Litigation, which retained the terms and conditions of settlement of the Stockholder Litigation contained in the MOU described in the preceding paragraph, with the addition that the Company will pay to plaintiff’s counsel an award of attorneys’ fees and reimbursement of expenses in the amount of $260,000 (collectively, the “Stockholder Litigation Settlement”). The Stockholder Litigation Settlement does not contain any admission of liability, wrongdoing or responsibility by any of the parties, and provides for mutual releases by all parties. Each stockholder of the Company is a member of the plaintiff class unless such stockholder opts out of the class. The Stipulation is independent of the Settlement Agreement and Repurchase Agreement that the Company had entered into with the Investor Parties.
On December 24, 2019, Ms. Paskowitz moved for preliminary approval of the Stipulation. On May 21, 2020, the Court entered an order preliminarily approving the Stipulation. The Court conducted a settlement hearing on April 20, 2021 to consider final approval of the Stipulation. On May 25, 2021, the Court issued a final order and judgment approving all material terms in the Stipulation. Pursuant to the terms of the final order, the Court fully and finally approved the settlement set forth in the Stipulation and dismissed the Stockholder Litigation with prejudice. The settlement payment was paid by the Company’s insurance provider under its insurance policy.
Please also refer to Note 8, Termination of Former CEO, regarding an ongoing lawsuit originally filed by the Company’s former Chief Executive Officer against the Company in the Supreme Court of the State of New York in March 2020.
(8) Termination of Former CEO
The Company terminated Christopher Hughes, the former Chief Executive Officer of the Company (“Hughes”), effective February 29, 2020 for “Cause” as defined in Section 6(a) of his Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated August 9, 2018 (the “Employment Agreement”). Despite having already been terminated from employment, on March 2, 2020, the Company received a letter from Mr. Hughes, providing notice of his intent to resign for “Good Reason” as defined in Section 7(c) of the Employment Agreement pursuant to which he claimed to be entitled to the “Enhanced Severance Amount” under the Employment Agreement. Hughes filed a complaint against the Company in the Supreme Court of the State of New York in March 2020 alleging two causes of action: (1) breach of his employment contract; and (2) breach of duty of good faith and fair dealing. Plaintiff Hughes alleges that he was terminated without cause or in the alternative that he resigned for good reason and therefore, pursuant to the Employment Agreement, Hughes seeks severance pay in the amount of $1,000,000 and reasonable costs and attorney’s fees. The Company denies Plaintiff’s allegations in their entirety and has filed counterclaims against Plaintiff for (1) declaratory relief; (2) breach of confidence/non-compete agreement; (3) declaratory and injunctive relief - confidence/non-compete; (4) tortious interference with current and prospective contractual and economic relations; (5) breach of fiduciary duty; (6) misappropriation of trade secrets; (7) declaratory and injunctive relief - unfair competition; and (8) conversion. The Company intends to vigorously defend and litigate this matter while recognizing the costs of litigation, including that it may divert the attention of management and key personnel from business operations.
(9) COVID-19
The COVID-19 outbreak in the United States has caused business disruption through mandated and voluntary closing of various businesses. While the disruption is currently expected to be temporary, there is considerable uncertainty around the duration of the closings and the impact of the pandemic on our business. Therefore, the Company expects this matter to continue to negatively impact its operating results in future periods. However, the full financial impact and duration cannot be reasonably estimated at this time.
(Continued)
TSR, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, Continued
May 31, 2021 and 2020
(10) Payroll Protection Program Loan
On April 15, 2020, the Company received loan proceeds of $6,659,220 under the Paycheck Protection Program (the “PPP Loan”). The Paycheck Protection Program (“PPP”) was established under the CARES Act and is administered by the U.S. Small Business Administration (“SBA”). The PPP Loan to the Company is being made through JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., a national banking association (the “PPP Lender”).
In March 2021, the Company submitted a PPP Loan forgiveness application to the SBA through the PPP Lender.
On July 7, 2021, the Company received notification from the PPP Lender that the SBA approved the Company’s application for forgiveness of the entire principal amount of the PPP Loan, plus all accrued interest. The PPP Lender will apply the forgiveness amount to satisfy the PPP Loan. The Company has no further obligations with respect to the PPP Loan. The forgiveness of the PPP Loan will be recognized during the Company’s fiscal 2022 first quarter ending August 31, 2021.
(11) Geneva Consulting Group Acquisition
On September 1, 2020, the Company completed the acquisition of all of the outstanding stock of Geneva Consulting Group, Inc., a New York corporation (“Geneva”) and provider of temporary and permanent information technology personnel based in Port Washington, New York. The stock of Geneva was purchased from the three shareholders of Geneva (the “Sellers”), none of which had, or will have following the acquisition, a material relationship with the Company or its affiliates.
The purchase price for the shares of Geneva was comprised of the following: (i) $1,452,000 in cash paid to Sellers at the closing of the acquisition, (ii) an amount of $748,000, that is equal to the amount of Geneva’s loan under the PPP that was not assumed by the Company and is expected to be substantially forgiven by the SBA, (iii) an amount up to $300,000 which may be paid as an earnout payment in part in February 2021 and in part in August 2021 (the “Earnout Payments”), (iv) bonus payments payable in $10,000 increments, (v) $747,000 for the net working capital of Geneva as of closing and (vi) other purchase price adjustments of which $36,000 has been paid to date. Any Earnout Payments and bonus payments will be determined based upon the achievement of certain criteria relating to the number the Company’s contractors working full-time at the Company’s clients on such dates.
The purchase agreement for the Geneva acquisition provided for a earn-out of up to $300,000 plus bonus amounts in $10,000 increments which are earned through August 31, 2021. The initial earn-out liability was valued at its fair value using an option pricing based approach with a risk-neutral framework using Black Scholes due to the option-like nature of the earn-out payment structure (Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy). The earn-out was revalued quarterly prior to the settlement discussed below, using a present value approach and any resulting increase or decrease was recorded into selling, general and administrative expenses. Any changes in the amount of the actual results and forecasted scenarios could impact the fair value. Significant judgment was employed in determining the appropriateness of the assumptions used in calculating the fair value of the earn-out as of the acquisition date and subsequent period ends.
On March 17, 2021, the Company entered into an agreement with the Sellers’ representatives pursuant to which the parties agreed to settle certain interpretive differences regarding the Sellers’ entitlement to the bonus payments described above. Pursuant to this agreement, and in full satisfaction of the Company’s obligations for deferred payments under the purchase agreement for the Geneva acquisition, the Sellers’ representative acknowledged receipt of the first Earnout Payment in the amount of $100,000, the parties agreed that the Company would make aggregate bonus payments to the Sellers’ representatives in the amount of $260,000, and the Company agreed to instruct the escrow agent to release to the Sellers’ representatives the second Earnout Payment in the amount of $200,000. All amounts relating to the Earnout Payments and bonus payments that had not been paid as of the date of the agreement were either paid by the Company or released by the escrow agent on March 18, 2021. No further earnout or bonus amounts can be earned or will be paid subsequent to March 18, 2021.
(Continued)
TSR, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, Continued
May 31, 2021 and 2020
The acquisition was accounted for as an acquisition of a business in accordance with the acquisition method of accounting. The acquired assets and assumed liabilities have been recorded at their estimated fair values. The Company determined the estimated fair values with the assistance of valuations performed by an independent third-party specialist. There have been no changes made to the valuation as of May 31, 2021.
The Company has incurred approximately $498,000 in legal fees, business broker fees, valuation services, accounting fees and other expenses to complete the Geneva acquisition, of which $220,000 of these expenses were recorded in the quarter ended February 28, 2021. This amount primarily relates to the accrual of additional bonus payments to the Sellers of $210,000 related to the March 17, 2021 agreement discussed above. All acquisition related costs have been expensed as incurred and included in selling, general and administrative expenses.
The following table summarizes the components of the purchase price at fair values at September 1, 2020:
Cash consideration paid to date $ 2,983,264
Estimated earnout and other liabilities 358,796
Total purchase price $ 3,342,060
The following table summarizes the allocation of purchase price at preliminary estimated fair values at September 1, 2020:
Cash $ 241,946
Accounts receivable 778,930
Prepaid expenses 5,249
Intangible assets (see Note 13) 1,800,000
Goodwill 785,883
Accrued expenses (269,948 )
Net assets $ 3,342,060
The following unaudited pro forma financial information presents the combined operating results of the Company and Geneva as if the acquisition had occurred as of the beginning of the earliest period presented. Pro forma data is subject to various assumptions and estimates and is presented for informational purposes only. This pro forma data does not purport to represent or be indicative of the consolidated operating results that would have been reported had the transaction been completed as described herein, and the data should not be taken as indicative of future operating results.
Unaudited pro forma financial information assuming the acquisition of Geneva as of June 1, 2019 is presented in the following table (in thousands):
Fiscal Year Ended
May 31, May 31,
Revenue $ 70,258 $ 68,340
Net loss $ (756 ) $ (1,060 )
Earnings loss per share $ (0.39 ) $ (0.54 )
(Continued)
TSR, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, Continued
May 31, 2021 and 2020
(12) Goodwill
Goodwill is recorded when the purchase price paid for an acquisition exceeds the estimated fair value of the net identified tangible and intangible assets acquired. Goodwill is not amortized but is subject to impairment analysis at least once annually or more frequently upon the occurrence of an event or when circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of a unit is greater than its fair value.
(13) Intangible Assets
The Company amortizes its intangible assets over their estimated useful lives and will review these assets for impairment when there is evidence that events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of these assets is measured by comparing the carrying amounts to the future undiscounted cash flows the assets are expected to generate. If intangible assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized equals the amount by which the carrying value of the asset exceeds its fair market value.
Intangible assets identified in the Geneva acquisition are as follows:
September 1,
Amortization May 31,
Database (estimated life 5 years) $ 230,000 $ 34,500 $ 195,500
Non-compete agreement (estimated life 2 years) 10,000 3,750 6,250
Trademark (estimated life 3 years) 60,000 15,000 45,000
Customer relationships (estimated life 15 years) 1,500,000 75,000 1,425,000
Total $ 1,800,000 $ 128,250 $ 1,671,750
No instances of triggering events or impairment indicators were identified at May 31, 2021.
(14) Related Party Transactions
On January 5, 2021, the members of the Board of Directors of TSR other than Robert Fitzgerald approved providing a waiver to QAR Industries, Inc. for its contemplated acquisition of shares owned by Fintech Consulting LLC under the Company’s A&R Rights Agreement so that a Distribution Date would not occur as a result of the Acquisition. QAR Industries, Inc. and Fintech Consulting LLC were both principal stockholders of the Company, each owning more than 5% of the Company’s outstanding common stock prior to the consummation of the Acquisition. Robert Fitzgerald is the President and majority shareholder of QAR Industries, Inc. The other directors of the Company are not affiliated with QAR Industries, Inc.
On February 3, 2021, the Acquisition was completed and QAR Industries, Inc. purchased 348,414 shares of TSR common stock from Fintech Consulting LLC at a price of $7.25 per share. At the same time, Bradley M. Tirpak, Chairman of TSR, purchased 27,586 shares of TSR common stock from Fintech Consulting LLC at a price of $7.25 per share.
TSR, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, Continued
May 31, 2021 and 2020
(15) Stock-based Compensation Expense
On January 28, 2021 the Company granted 108,333 shares in time vesting stock awards and 69,167 shares in time and performance vesting stock awards to officers, directors and key employees under the TSR, Inc. 2020 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Plan”). The time vesting shares vest in tranches at the one, two and three-year anniversaries of the grants (“service condition”). These shares had a grant date fair value of $826,000 based on the closing price of TSR common stock on the day prior to the grants. The associated compensation expense is recognized on a straight-line basis over the time between grant date and the date the shares vest (the “service period”). The time and performance vesting shares also vest in tranches at or after the two and three-year anniversaries of the grants. The performance condition is defined in the grant agreements and relates to the market price of the Company’s common stock over a stated period of time (“market condition”). These shares had a grant date value $262,000 based on the closing price of TSR common shares on the day prior to the grants discounted by an estimated forfeiture rate of 40-60%. The Company took into account the historical volatility of its common stock to assess the probability of satisfying the market condition. The associated compensation expense is recognized on a straight-line basis between the time the achievement of the performance criteria is deemed probable and the time the shares may vest. During the fiscal year ending May 31, 2021, $236,000 has been record as stock-based compensation expense and included in selling, general and administrative expenses. As of May 31, 2021, there is approximately $852,000 of unearned compensation expense that will be expensed through February 2024; 142,666 stock awards expected to vest; and zero vested awards.
(Continued)
TSR, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

---

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
None

---

ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures
Disclosure Controls and Procedures. The Company conducted an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the principal executive officer and principal financial officer, of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)). Based on this evaluation, the principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this report, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective.
Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. There was no change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the Company’s most recently reported completed fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. The Company’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act. Under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including its principal executive officer and principal financial officer, the Company conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting based on criteria established in the framework in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this evaluation, the Company’s management concluded that its internal control over financial reporting was effective as of May 31, 2021.
Internal control over financial reporting, no matter how well designed, has inherent limitations. Therefore, internal control over financial reporting determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and may not prevent or detect all misstatements. Moreover, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
This annual report does not include an attestation report of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm pursuant to rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit the Company to provide only management’s report in this annual report.

---

ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 9B. Other Information
As previously disclosed, on April 1, 2020, the Company entered into a binding term sheet (“Term Sheet”) with Zeff Capital, L.P. (“Zeff”) pursuant to which it agreed to pay Zeff an amount of $900,000 over a period of three years in cash or cash and stock in settlement of expenses incurred by Zeff during its solicitations in 2018 and 2019 in connection with the annual meetings of the Company, the costs incurred in connection with the litigation initiated by and against the Company as well as negotiation, execution and enforcement of the Settlement and Release Agreement, dated as of August 30, 2019, by and between the Company, Zeff and certain other parties. In exchange for certain mutual releases, the Term Sheet calls for a cash payment of $300,000 on June 30, 2021, a second cash payment of $300,000 on June 30, 2022 and a third payment of $300,00 also on June 30, 2022, which can be paid in cash or common stock at the Company’s option. There is no interest due on these payments. The agreement also has protections to defer such payment dates so that the debt covenants with the Company’s lender are not breached. On August 13, 2020, the Company, Zeff, Zeff Holding Company, LLC and Daniel Zeff entered into a settlement agreement to reflect these terms. Any installment payment which is deferred as permitted above will accrue interest at the prime rate plus 3.75%, and Zeff shall thereby have the option to convert such deferred amounts (plus accrued interest if any) into shares of the Company’s common stock. The foregoing descriptions do not purport to be complete and are qualified in their entirety by the full text of the agreement, which was attached to the Annual Report for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2020 as Exhibit 10.6 and incorporated herein by reference.
TSR, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Part III

---

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
The information required by this Item 10 is incorporated by reference to the Company’s definitive proxy statement in connection with the 2021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

---

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Item 11. Executive Compensation
The information required by this Item 11 is incorporated by reference to the Company’s definitive proxy statement in connection with the 2021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

---

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
The information required by this Item 12 is incorporated by reference to the Company’s definitive proxy statement in connection with the 2021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

---

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
The information required by this Item 13 is incorporated by reference to the Company’s definitive proxy statement in connection with the 2021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

---

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES
Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services
The information required by this Item 14 is incorporated by reference to the Company’s definitive proxy statement in connection with the 2021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
TSR, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Part IV

---

ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
(a) The following documents are filed as part of this report:
1. The consolidated financial statements as indicated in the index set forth on page 21.
Financial Statement Schedules have been omitted, since they are either not applicable, not required or the information is included elsewhere herein.
2. Exhibits as listed in Exhibit Index on page 26.
TSR, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES