EDGAR 10-K Filing

Company CIK: 1025835
Filing Year: 2021
Filename: 1025835_10-K_2021_0001025835-21-000018.json

---

ITEM 1. BUSINESS
ITEM 1: BUSINESS
Forward-Looking Information
Some of the information in this Annual Report on Form 10-K may contain “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of and intended to be covered by the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, and by Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Forward-looking statements typically are identified with use of terms such as “may,” “might,” “will, “would,” “should,” “expect,” “plan,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “predict,” “potential,” “could,” “continue” and the negative of these terms and similar words, although some forward-looking statements may be expressed differently. Forward-looking statements also include, but are not limited to, statements regarding plans, objectives, expectations or consequences of announced transactions, known trends, and statements about future performance, operations, products and services. The ability to predict results or the actual effect of future plans or strategies is inherently uncertain. The COVID-19 pandemic is adversely affecting us, our customers, counterparties, employees, and third-party service providers, and the ultimate extent of the impacts on our business, financial position, results of operations, liquidity, and prospects is uncertain. Continued deterioration in general business and economic conditions, including further increases in unemployment rates, or turbulence in domestic or global financial markets could adversely affect our revenues and the values of our assets and liabilities, reduce the availability of funding, lead to a tightening of credit, and further increase stock price volatility. In addition, changes to statutes, regulations, or regulatory policies or practices as a result of, or in response to COVID-19, could affect us in substantial and unpredictable ways. Other factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include, but are not limited to: the ability to efficiently integrate acquisitions, including the Seacoast acquisition, into our operations, retain the customers of these businesses and grow the acquired operations; credit risk; changes in the appraised valuation of real estate securing impaired loans; outcomes of litigation and other contingencies; exposure to general and local economic conditions; risks associated with rapid increases or decreases in prevailing interest rates; consolidation within the banking industry; competition from banks and other financial institutions; the ability to attract and retain relationship officers and other key personnel; burdens imposed by federal and state regulation; changes in regulatory requirements; changes in accounting regulation or standards applicable to banks, including ASU 2016-13 (Topic 326), “Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments,” commonly referenced as the Current Expected Credit Loss (“CECL”) model, which we adopted on January 1, 2020 and which changed how we estimate credit losses and may increase the required level of our allowance for credit losses in future periods; uncertainty regarding the future of LIBOR; natural disasters; war or terrorist activities, or pandemics, or the outbreak of COVID-19 or similar outbreaks, and their effects on economic and business environments in which we operate; and other risks discussed under the caption “Risk Factors” in Item 1A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, all of which could cause actual results to differ from those set forth in the forward-looking statements.
Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements, which reflect management’s analysis and expectations only as of the date of such statements. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made, and the Company does not intend, and undertakes no obligation, to publicly revise or update forward-looking statements after the date of this report, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by federal securities law. You should understand that it is not possible to predict or identify all risk factors. Readers should carefully review all disclosures we file from time to time with the Securities and Exchange Commission which are available on the Company’s website at www.enterprisebank.com under “Investor Relations.”
General Development and Description of Our Business
Enterprise Financial Services Corp (“we,” “us,” or “our”), a Delaware corporation, is a financial holding company headquartered in Clayton, Missouri incorporated in December 1994. We are the holding company for Enterprise Bank & Trust, a full-service financial institution offering banking and wealth management services to individuals and corporate customers primarily located in Arizona, California, Kansas, Missouri, Nevada, and New Mexico. Our
executive offices are located at 150 North Meramec Avenue, Clayton, Missouri 63105, and our telephone number is (314) 725-5500.
Our stated mission is “Guiding people to a lifetime of financial success.” We have established an accompanying corporate vision, “To be a company where our associates are proud to work, that delivers ease of navigation to our customers and value to our investors, while helping our communities flourish.” These tenets are fundamental to our business strategies and operations.
Our business objective is to generate attractive shareholder returns by providing comprehensive financial services primarily to privately-held businesses, their owner families, and other success-minded individuals. To achieve these objectives we have developed a business strategy that leverages a focused and relationship-oriented distribution and sales approach, with an emphasis on niche businesses and growing fee income, while maintaining prudent credit and interest rate risk management, appropriate supporting technology, and controlled expense growth. We believe this strategy allows us to maximize organic growth opportunities, which we supplement and enhance through disciplined strategic growth.
As described in greater detail below, the Company offers a broad range of business and personal banking services, including wealth management services provided through Enterprise Trust. Lending services include C&I, CRE, real estate construction and development, residential real estate, SBA, consumer and tax credit-related loan products. A wide variety of deposit products and a complete suite of treasury management and international trade services, along with our tax credit brokerage activities, complement our lending capabilities.
Building long-term client relationships - Our growth strategy is first and foremost client relationship driven. We continuously seek to add clients who fit our target market of businesses, business owners, professionals, and associated relationships. Those relationships are maintained, cultivated, and expanded over time by trained, experienced banking officers and other professionals. We fund loan growth primarily with core deposits from our business and professional clients in addition to consumers in our branch market areas. This is supplemented by borrowing or other deposit sources, including advances from the FHLB, and brokered certificates of deposits.
Specialized lending and product niches - We have focused our lending activities in specialty markets where we believe our expertise and experience as a commercial lender provides advantages over other competitors. In addition, we have developed expertise in certain product niches. These specialty niche activities focus on the following areas:
•Sponsor Finance. We support mid-market company mergers and acquisitions in many domestic markets. We market directly to targeted private equity firms, principally SBICs, and provide primarily senior debt financing to portfolio companies.
•Life Insurance Premium Finance. We specialize in financing whole life insurance premiums utilized in high net worth estate planning, through relationships with boutique estate planners throughout the United States.
•Tax Credit Related Lending. We are a secured lender on affordable housing projects funded through the use of federal and state low income housing tax credits. In addition, we provide leveraged and other loans on projects funded through the U.S. Department of the Treasury Community Development Financial Institution (“CDFI”) New Markets Tax Credit Program. In prior years, we were selected to distribute New Markets Tax Credits, and we continue to participate in the application process, as well as serve as a secured lender to other allocatees.
•Tax Credit Brokerage. We acquire 10-year streams of Missouri state tax credits from affordable housing development funds and sell the tax credits to clients and other individuals for tax planning purposes. We also have a minority ownership in a partnership that acquires, invests and sells, state low income housing tax credits. We lend the partnership money with 6 - 12 year terms and receive interest income and fee income when projects close and when credits are sold.
•SBA 7(a). We have a team of experienced bankers in production offices across 13 states that originate loans through the SBA 7(a) program. These loans are primarily owner-occupied, commercial real estate loans secured by a 1st lien. These loans predominantly have a 75% portion guaranteed by the SBA. By focusing on this specific product type, we have developed an expertise that allows for speed and reliability of execution.
Fee income business - We offer a broad range of treasury management products and services that benefit businesses ranging from large national clients to local merchants. Customized solutions and special product bundles are available to clients of all sizes. In response to ever increasing needs for data/information security and functional efficiency, we continue to offer robust cash management systems that employ mobile technology and fraud detection/mitigation services. Enterprise Trust offers a wide range of fiduciary, investment management, and financial advisory services to facilitate our providing these services. We also offer international banking, and tax credit businesses that generate fee income.
Use of technology - Our client technology product offerings include, but are not limited to, internet banking, mobile banking, cash management products, remote deposit capture, positive pay services, fraud detection and prevention, automated payables, check image, and statement and document imaging. Additional service offerings currently supported by the Bank include controlled disbursements, repurchase agreements, and sweep investment accounts. Our cash management suite of products blends technology and personal service, which we believe often creates a competitive advantage over our competition. Technology products are also extensively utilized within the organization by associates in all lines of business including operations and support, customer service, and financial reporting for internal management purposes and for external compliance.
Maintaining asset quality - We monitor asset quality through formal, ongoing, multiple-level reviews of loans in each market and specialized lending niche. These reviews are overseen by the Bank’s credit administration department. In addition, the loan portfolio is subject to ongoing monitoring by a loan review function that reports directly to the Credit Committee of the Bank’s Board of Directors.
Expense management - We manage expenses carefully through detailed budgeting and expense approval processes and measurement of the “efficiency ratio”. The efficiency ratio is equal to noninterest expense divided by total revenue (net interest income plus noninterest income).
Growth through Acquisitions - Disciplined strategic acquisitions have contributed significantly to the Corporation’s growth and expansion over the past five years. Most recently, on November 12, 2020, the Company closed its acquisition of 100% of Seacoast and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Seacoast Commerce Bank. Seacoast operated five full-service retail and commercial banking offices in California and Nevada, as well as SBA loan production and deposit production offices in Arizona, California, Colorado, Illinois, Indiana, Massachusetts, Michigan, Nevada, Ohio, Oregon, Texas, Utah, and Washington. Seacoast shareholders received 0.5061 shares of EFSC common stock for each Seacoast common share and cash in lieu of any fractional shares. In connection with the merger, Enterprise issued approximately 5.0 million shares of EFSC common stock valued at $33.56 per share, which was the closing price of Enterprise common stock on November 12, 2020. The value of the transaction consideration was approximately $169 million. The Seacoast acquisition enhanced the Company’s commercial and specialty lending verticals, while enhancing the Company’s funding profile with deposit expertise in property management, homeowners’ associations, and escrow services, and materially expanding the Company’s geographic footprint.
On March 8, 2019, the Company closed its acquisition of 100% of Trinity and its wholly-owned subsidiary, LANB. Trinity operated six full-service retail and commercial banking offices in Los Alamos, Santa Fe, and Albuquerque, New Mexico. Trinity shareholders received cash consideration of $1.84 per share of Trinity common stock and 0.1972 shares of EFSC common stock per share of Trinity common stock with cash in lieu of fractional shares. Aggregate consideration at closing was approximately 4.0 million shares of EFSC common stock and $37.3 million cash paid to Trinity shareholders. Based on EFSC’s closing stock price of $43.07 on March 7, 2019, the overall transaction had a value of $209.2 million. The Trinity acquisition expanded the Company’s geographic footprint into New Mexico.
Competition
The Company and its subsidiaries operate in highly competitive markets. Our geographic markets are served by multiple large financial and bank holding companies with substantial capital resources and lending capacity. We face competition not only from other financial holding companies and commercial banks, but also from credit
unions, investment managers, insurers, brokerage firms, technology companies, and other providers of financial services and products. Strong competition for deposit and loan products affects the rates of those products, as well as the terms on which they are offered to customers.
Available Information
Various reports provided to the SEC, including our annual reports, quarterly reports, current reports, proxy statements, and amendments to such reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, are available free of charge on our website at www.enterprisebank.com under the “Investor Relations” link. These reports are made available as soon as reasonably practicable after they are electronically filed with or furnished to the SEC. Our filings with the SEC are also available on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. All website addresses given in this document are for information only and are not intended to be an active link or to incorporate any website information into this document.
Supervision and Regulation
The following is a summary description of the relevant laws, rules, and regulations governing banks and financial holding companies. The description of, and references to, the statutes and regulations below are brief summaries and do not purport to be complete. The descriptions are qualified in their entirety by reference to the related statutes and regulations.
The regulatory and supervisory structure establishes a comprehensive framework of activities in which an institution can engage and is intended primarily for the protection of depositors, the deposit insurance funds and the banking system as a whole, rather than for the protection of shareholders or creditors. The regulatory structure also gives the regulatory authorities extensive discretion in connection with their supervisory and enforcement activities and examination policies, including policies concerning the establishment of deposit insurance assessment fees, classification of assets and establishment of adequate loan loss reserves for regulatory purposes.
Various legislation is from time to time introduced in Congress and Missouri’s legislature. Such legislation may change applicable statutes and the operating environment in substantial and unpredictable ways. We cannot determine the ultimate effect that future legislation or implementing regulations would have upon our financial condition or upon our results of operations or the results of operations of any of our subsidiaries.
The Dodd-Frank Act, by way of example, contains a comprehensive set of provisions designed to govern the practices and oversight of financial institutions and other participants in the financial markets. The Dodd-Frank Act made extensive changes in the regulation of financial institutions and their holding companies. Some of the changes brought about by the Dodd-Frank Act have been modified by the Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer Protection Act of 2018 (the “Regulatory Relief Act”), signed into law on May 24, 2018. The Dodd-Frank Act has increased the regulatory burden and compliance costs of the Company.
Legislative and Regulatory Actions in Connection with Global Pandemic. On January 31, 2020, the Secretary of Health and Human Services declared a public health emergency due to the global outbreak of a new strain of coronavirus (COVID-19). On March 13, 2020, the President of the United States proclaimed the COVID-19 as a national emergency, following the World Health Organization’s categorization of the outbreak as a pandemic. COVID-19 continues to aggressively spread globally, including throughout the United States. The pandemic and resulting travel bans, closure of non-essential businesses, social distancing measures and government responses across the country have had a profound impact on the global economy, financial markets and how business has been conducted across all industries and have affected many of the Company’s customers and clients. To the extent the economic impacts of the pandemic continue for a prolonged period and conditions stagnate or worsen, our provision for credit losses, noninterest income, and profitability may be adversely affected.
On March 27, 2020, the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (“CARES”) Act was signed into law. The CARES Act contains provisions to assist individuals and businesses, including the SBA’s Paycheck Protection Program. The PPP provided $349 billion in guaranteed loans that are forgivable if certain requirements are met. On April 24, 2020 and December 27, 2020 an additional $310 billion and $284 billion, respectively, was added to the PPP. The CARES Act also provides certain temporary regulatory relief for financial institutions. The act permits
financial institutions to temporarily suspend any determination of a loan modified as a result of the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic as being a troubled debt restructuring (“TDR”), including impairment for accounting purposes. We elected to apply the CARES Act relief to certain loan modifications that relate primarily to short-term payment deferrals and have not classified such modifications as TDRs.
The CARES Act included a provision that allowed depository institutions the option to defer adoption of the CECL standard to the earlier of (1) the end of the COVID-19 national emergency or (2) December 31, 2020. The Company did not elect the deferral option.
The CARES Act grants potential tax relief and liquidity to businesses, including corporate tax provisions that: temporarily allow for the carryback of net operating losses and remove limitations on the use of loss carryforwards, increase interest expense deduction limitations, and allow accelerated depreciation deductions on certain asset improvements.
Financial Holding Company
The Company is a financial holding company registered under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended (“BHCA”). As a financial holding company, the Company is subject to regulation and examination by the Federal Reserve, and is required to file periodic reports of its operations and such additional information as the Federal Reserve may require. In order to remain a financial holding company, the Company must continue to be considered well-managed and well-capitalized by the Federal Reserve, and the Bank must continue to be considered well-managed and well-capitalized by the FDIC, and have at least a “satisfactory” rating under the Community Reinvestment Act. See “Liquidity and Capital Resources” in the Management Discussion and Analysis for more information on our capital adequacy, and “Bank Subsidiary - Community Reinvestment Act” below for more information on the Community Reinvestment Act.
Stock Repurchase Plans: From time to time the Company may engage in stock repurchases. The Federal Reserve requires that bank and financial holding companies, where certain conditions are triggered, provide prior notice to, consult with, and in certain circumstances seek the approval of, the Federal Reserve or reserve bank staff prior to implementing a stock repurchase plan. In addition to the formal guidance, the Federal Reserve appears to have adopted an informal policy of requiring bank and financial holding companies to seek a safety and soundness “non-objection” from the appropriate regulatory staff prior to implementing a stock repurchase plan, regardless of the financial or capital position of the holding company. In some cases, examiners following this informal policy have required the holding company to produce additional information and materials for review.
Acquisitions: With certain limited exceptions, the BHCA requires every financial holding company or bank holding company to obtain the prior approval of the Federal Reserve before (i) acquiring substantially all the assets of any bank, (ii) acquiring direct or indirect ownership or control of any voting shares of any bank if, after such acquisition, it would own or control more than 5% of the voting shares of such bank (unless it already owns or controls the majority of such shares), or (iii) merging or consolidating with another bank holding company. Additionally, the BHCA provides that the Federal Reserve may not approve any of these transactions if it would result in or tend to create a monopoly, substantially lessen competition, or otherwise function as a restraint of trade, unless the anti-competitive effects of the proposed transaction are clearly outweighed by the public interest in meeting the convenience and needs of the community to be served. The Federal Reserve also is required to consider the financial and managerial resources and future prospects of the bank holding companies and banks concerned and the convenience and needs of the community to be served. The Federal Reserve’s consideration of financial resources generally focuses on capital adequacy, which is described below.
Change in Bank Control: Subject to various exceptions, the BHCA and the Change in Bank Control Act, together with related regulations, require Federal Reserve approval prior to any person or company acquiring “control” of a bank or financial holding company. Control is conclusively presumed to exist if an individual or company acquires 25% or more of any class of voting securities of the Company or controls a majority of the board of directors. In certain circumstances, control is rebuttably presumed to exist if a person or company acquires 10% or more, but less
than 25%, of any class of voting securities of the Company. The regulations provide a procedure for challenging rebuttable presumptions of control.
Permitted Activities: The BHCA has generally prohibited a bank holding company from engaging in activities other than banking or managing or controlling banks or other permissible subsidiaries and from acquiring or retaining direct or indirect control of any company engaged in any activities other than those determined by the Federal Reserve to be closely related to banking or managing or controlling banks as to be a proper incident thereto. Provisions of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act have expanded the permissible activities of a bank holding company that qualifies as a financial holding company. Under the regulations implementing the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, a financial holding company may engage in additional activities that are financial in nature or incidental or complementary to financial activities. Those activities include, among other activities, certain insurance, advisory and securities activities.
Support of Bank Subsidiaries: Under Federal Reserve policy, the Company is expected to act as a source of financial strength for the Bank and to commit resources to support the Bank. In addition, pursuant to the Dodd-Frank Act, this longstanding policy has been given the force of law, and additional regulations promulgated by the Federal Reserve to further implement the statute are possible; however, the bank subsidiary support provisions of the statute are fully effective even absent implementing regulations. As in the past, such financial support from the Company may be required at times when, without this legal requirement, the Company may not be inclined to provide it.
Capital Adequacy: The Company is also subject to capital requirements applied on a consolidated basis, which are substantially similar to those required of the Bank (summarized below).
Dividend Restrictions: Under Federal Reserve policies, financial holding companies may pay cash dividends on common stock only out of income available over the past year if prospective earnings retention is consistent with the organization’s expected future needs and financial condition and if the organization is not in danger of not meeting its minimum regulatory capital requirements. Federal Reserve policy also provides that financial holding companies should not maintain a level of cash dividends that undermines the financial holding company’s ability to serve as a source of strength to its banking subsidiaries.
Bank Subsidiary
The Bank is a Missouri trust company with banking powers and is subject to supervision and regulation by the Missouri Division of Finance. In addition, as a Federal Reserve non-member bank, it is subject to supervision and regulation by the FDIC. The Bank is a member of the FHLB of Des Moines.
The Bank is subject to extensive federal and state regulatory oversight. The various regulatory authorities regulate or monitor all areas of the banking operations, including security devices and procedures, adequacy of capitalization and loss reserves, loans, investments, borrowings, deposits, mergers, issuance of securities, payment of dividends, interest rates payable on deposits, interest rates or fees chargeable on loans, establishment of branches, corporate reorganizations, maintenance of books and records, and adequacy of staff training to carry on safe lending and deposit gathering practices. The Bank must maintain certain capital ratios and is subject to limitations on aggregate investments in real estate, bank premises, low-income housing projects, and furniture and fixtures. In connection with their supervision and regulation responsibilities, the Bank is subject to periodic examination by the FDIC and Missouri Division of Finance.
Capital Adequacy: The Bank is required to comply with the FDIC’s capital adequacy standards for insured banks. The FDIC has issued risk-based capital and leverage capital guidelines for measuring capital adequacy, and all applicable capital standards must be satisfied for the Bank to be considered in compliance with regulatory capital requirements.
In 2013, the Federal Reserve, FDIC and OCC approved a final rule to establish a new comprehensive regulatory capital framework for all U.S. banking organizations. This regulatory capital framework, commonly referred to as Basel III, implemented several changes to the U.S. regulatory capital framework required by the Dodd-Frank Act.
The Basel III final rule, effective January 1, 2015, established a new CET1 requirement and increased the minimum tier 1 capital requirement to 6.0%. In addition, all banking organizations must maintain a CCB consisting of CET1 capital in an amount equal to 2.5% of risk-weighted assets in order to avoid restrictions on their ability to make capital distributions and to pay certain discretionary bonus payments to executive officers. The CCB effectively increased the minimum CET1 capital, tier 1 capital, and total capital ratios for U.S. banking organizations to 7.0%, 8.5%, and 10.5%, respectively, as of January 1, 2019.
As required by the Basel III final rule, capital instruments such as trust preferred securities and cumulative preferred shares have been phased out of tier 1 capital for banking organizations that had $15 billion or more in total consolidated assets as of December 31, 2009, and grandfathered as tier 1 capital such instruments issued by smaller entities prior to May 19, 2010 (provided they do not exceed 25% of tier 1 capital). The Company’s trust preferred securities currently are grandfathered under this provision.
Prompt Corrective Action: The Bank’s capital categories are determined for the purpose of applying the “prompt corrective action” rules described below and may be taken into consideration by banking regulators in evaluating proposals for expansion or new activities. They are not necessarily an accurate representation of a bank’s overall financial condition or prospects for other purposes. A failure to meet the capital guidelines could subject the Bank to a variety of enforcement actions under those rules, including the issuance of a capital directive, the termination of deposit insurance by the FDIC, a prohibition on the taking of brokered deposits, and other restrictions on its business. As described below, the FDIC also can impose other substantial restrictions on banks that fail to meet applicable capital requirements.
Federal law establishes a system of prompt corrective action to resolve the problems of undercapitalized banks. Under this system, the FDIC has established five capital categories (“well-capitalized,” “adequately capitalized,” “undercapitalized,” “significantly undercapitalized,” and “critically undercapitalized”) and is required to take various mandatory supervisory actions, and is authorized to take other discretionary actions with respect to banks in the three undercapitalized categories. The severity of any such actions taken will depend upon the capital category in which a bank is placed. Generally, subject to a narrow exception, current federal law requires the FDIC to appoint a receiver or conservator for a bank that is critically undercapitalized.
The following table summarizes the prompt corrective action categories:
Prompt Corrective Action Category Total Risk-Based Capital Tier 1 Risk-Based Capital Common Equity Tier 1 Risk-Based Capital Tier 1 Leverage Ratio
Well-capitalized 10.0% 8.0% 6.5% 5.0%
Adequately capitalized 8.0% 6.0% 4.5% 4.0%
Undercapitalized < 8.0% < 6.0% < 4.5% < 4.0%
Significantly undercapitalized < 6.0% < 4.0% < 3.0% < 3.0%
Critically undercapitalized Tangible equity / Total assets ≤ 2.0%
A bank that becomes “undercapitalized,” “significantly undercapitalized,” or “critically undercapitalized” is required to submit an acceptable capital restoration plan to the FDIC. An “undercapitalized” bank also is generally prohibited from increasing its average total assets, making acquisitions, establishing new branches, or engaging in any new line of business, except in accordance with an accepted capital restoration plan or with the approval of the FDIC. Also, the FDIC may treat an “undercapitalized” bank as being “significantly undercapitalized” if it determines that those actions are necessary to carry out the purpose of the law.
All of the Bank’s capital ratios were at levels that qualify it to be “well-capitalized” for regulatory purposes as of December 31, 2020.
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau: The Dodd-Frank Act centralized responsibility for consumer financial protection including implementing, examining and enforcing compliance with federal consumer financial laws with the CFPB. Depository institutions with less than $10 billion in assets, such as our Bank, will be subject to rules
promulgated by the CFPB, but will continue to be examined and supervised by federal banking regulators for consumer compliance purposes.
The CFPB has broad rule-making authority for a wide range of consumer protection laws that apply to all banks, including the authority to prohibit unfair, deceptive or abusive acts and practices. In addition, the Dodd-Frank Act enhanced the regulation of mortgage banking and gave to the CFPB oversight of many of the core laws which regulate the mortgage industry and the authority to implement mortgage regulations. Any new regulations adopted by the CFPB may significantly impact consumer mortgage lending and servicing.
The Bank is also subject to other laws and regulations intended to protect consumers in transactions with depository institutions, as well as other laws or regulations affecting customers of financial institutions generally. While the list set forth herein is not exhaustive, these laws and regulations include the Truth in Lending Act, the Truth in Savings Act, the Electronic Funds Transfer Act, the Expedited Funds Availability Act, the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, the Fair Housing Act, the Real Estate Settlement and Procedures Act, the Fair Credit Reporting Act and the Federal Trade Commission Act, among others. These laws and regulations mandate certain disclosure requirements and regulate the manner in which financial institutions must deal with customers when taking deposits or making loans to such customers. The Bank must comply with the applicable provisions of these consumer protection laws and regulations as part of its ongoing customer relations.
UDAP and UDAAP: Banking regulatory agencies have increasingly used a general consumer protection statute to address “unethical” or otherwise “bad” business practices that may not necessarily fall directly under the purview of a specific banking or consumer finance law. The law of choice for enforcement against such business practices has been Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act - the primary federal law that prohibits unfair or deceptive acts or practices and unfair methods of competition in or affecting commerce (“UDAP” or “FTC Act”). “Unjustified consumer injury” is the principal focus of the FTC Act. Moreover, the UDAP provisions have been expanded under the Dodd-Frank Act to apply to “unfair, deceptive or abusive acts or practices” (“UDAAP”), which has been delegated to the CFPB for supervision. The CFPB has brought a variety of enforcement actions for violations of UDAAP provisions and CFPB guidance continues to evolve.
Mortgage Reform: The CFPB has adopted final rules implementing minimum standards for the origination of residential mortgages, including standards regarding a customer’s ability to repay, restricting variable-rate lending by requiring the ability to repay variable-rate loans be determined by using the maximum rate that will apply during the first five years of a variable-rate loan term, and making more loans subject to provisions for higher cost loans, new disclosures, and certain other revisions. While the Dodd-Frank Act allows borrowers to raise certain defenses to foreclosure if they receive any loan other than a “qualified mortgage” as defined by the CFPB, the Regulatory Relief Act provides certain presumptions of qualified mortgage status for banks with assets of less than $10 billion, subject to certain documentation and product issues.
Dividends by the Bank Subsidiary: Under Missouri law, the Bank may pay dividends to the Company only from a portion of its undivided profits and may not pay dividends if its capital is impaired. As an insured depository institution, federal law prohibits the Bank from making any capital distributions, including the payment of a cash dividend if it is “undercapitalized” or after making the distribution would become undercapitalized. If the FDIC believes the Bank is engaged in, or about to engage in, an unsafe or unsound practice, the FDIC may require, after notice and hearing, that the bank cease and desist from that practice. The FDIC has indicated that paying dividends that deplete a depository institution’s capital base to an inadequate level would be an unsafe and unsound banking practice. The FDIC has issued policy statements that provide that insured banks generally should pay dividends only from their current operating earnings. The Bank’s payment of dividends also could be affected or limited by other factors, such as events or circumstances which lead the FDIC to require that it maintain capital in excess of regulatory guidelines.
Transactions with Affiliates and Insiders: The Bank is subject to the provisions of Regulation W promulgated by the Federal Reserve, which encompasses Sections 23A and 23B of the Federal Reserve Act. Regulation W places limits and conditions on the amount of loans or extensions of credit to, investments in, or certain other transactions with, affiliates and on the amount of advances to third parties collateralized by the securities or obligations of
affiliates. Regulation W also prohibits, among other things, an institution from engaging in certain transactions with certain affiliates unless the transactions are on terms substantially the same, or at least as favorable to such institution or its subsidiaries, as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with nonaffiliated companies. Federal law also places restrictions on the Bank’s ability to extend credit to its executive officers, directors, principal shareholders and their related interests. These extensions of credit must be made on substantially the same terms, including interest rates and collateral, as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with unrelated third parties; and must not involve more than the normal risk of repayment or present other unfavorable features.
Community Reinvestment Act: The Community Reinvestment Act (“CRA”) requires that, in connection with examinations of financial institutions within its jurisdiction, the FDIC is required to evaluate the record of the financial institutions in meeting the credit needs of their local communities, including low and moderate income neighborhoods, consistent with the safe and sound operation of those institutions. These factors are also considered in evaluating mergers, acquisitions, and applications to open a branch or facility. The Bank has a satisfactory rating under CRA.
In April 2018, the U.S. Department of Treasury issued a memorandum to the federal banking regulators recommending changes to the CRA’s regulations to reduce their complexity and associated burden on banks, and in December 2019, the FDIC and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency proposed for public comment rules to modernize the agencies' regulations under the CRA. In September 2020, the Federal Reserve Board released for public comment its proposed rules to modernize CRA regulations. We will continue to evaluate the impact of any changes to the CRA regulations.
USA PATRIOT Act: The Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001 (the “USA PATRIOT Act”) requires each financial institution to: (i) establish an anti-money laundering program; (ii) establish due diligence policies, procedures and controls with respect to its private banking accounts and correspondent banking accounts involving foreign individuals and certain foreign banks; and (iii) implement certain due diligence policies, procedures and controls with regard to correspondent accounts in the United States for, or on behalf of, a foreign bank that does not have a physical presence in any country. In addition, the USA PATRIOT Act contains a provision encouraging cooperation among financial institutions, regulatory authorities and law enforcement authorities with respect to individuals, entities and organizations engaged in, or reasonably suspected of engaging in, terrorist acts or money laundering activities.
Commercial Real Estate Lending: The Bank’s lending operations may be subject to enhanced scrutiny by federal banking regulators based on its concentration of commercial real estate loans. CRE loans generally include land development, construction loans, and loans secured by multifamily property, and non-farm, nonresidential real property where the primary source of repayment is derived from rental income associated with the property. On December 6, 2006, the federal banking regulators issued final guidance to remind financial institutions of the risk posed by CRE lending concentrations. The guidance prescribes the following guidelines for its examiners to help identify institutions that are potentially exposed to significant CRE risk, including concentrations in certain types of CRE that may warrant greater supervisory scrutiny: total reported loans for construction, land development, and other land represent 100% or more of the institutions total capital; or total commercial real estate loans represent 300% or more of the institution’s total capital, and the outstanding balance of the institution’s commercial real estate loan portfolio has increased by 50% or more.
Volcker Rule: On December 10, 2013, the federal regulators adopted final regulations to implement the proprietary trading and private fund prohibitions of the Volcker Rule under the Dodd-Frank Act. Under the final regulations, banking entities are generally prohibited, subject to significant exceptions from: (i) short-term proprietary trading as principal in securities and other financial instruments, and (ii) sponsoring or acquiring or retaining an ownership interest in private equity and hedge funds. Revisions to the Volcker Rule in 2019, that become effective in 2020, simplifies and streamlines the compliance requirements for banks that do not have significant trading activities. The Regulatory Relief Act provided an exemption from the above restrictions for banks with less than $10 billion in assets. In 2020, the OCC, Federal Reserve, FDIC, SEC and Commodity Futures Trading Commission finalized
further amendments to the Volcker Rule. The amendments include new exclusions from the Volcker Rule’s general prohibitions on banking entities investing in and sponsoring private equity funds, hedge funds, and certain other investment vehicles (collectively “covered funds”). The amendments in the final rule, which became effective on October 1, 2020, clarify and expand permissible banking activities and relationships under the Volcker Rule.
Governmental Policies
The operations of the Company and its subsidiaries are affected not only by general economic conditions, but also by the policies of various regulatory authorities. In particular, the Federal Reserve regulates monetary policy and interest rates in order to influence general economic conditions. These policies have a significant influence on overall growth and distribution of loans, investments and deposits and affect interest rates charged on loans or paid for deposits. Federal Reserve monetary policies have had a significant effect on the operating results of all financial institutions in the past and may continue to do so in the future.
Human Capital Management
We pride ourselves in creating an open, diverse, and transparent culture that celebrates teamwork and recognizes associates at all levels. We expect and encourage participation and collaboration, and understand that we need each other to be successful. We value accountability because it is essential to our success, and we accept our responsibility to hold ourselves and others accountable for meeting shareholder commitments and achieving exceptional standards of performance. We also believe in work/life balance for our associates.
Because quality of life is important to the health of our Company and associates, we are committed to creating a culture that emphasizes and encourages wellness. Our wellness program is designed to help associates avoid illness while improving and maintaining their general health. Each year, we provide a variety of information and promote health challenges to educate associates on proper diet, exercise, stress management and prevention strategies. Annual health screenings are provided to all associates at no charge.
Soliciting Feedback. We conduct associate surveys to ensure that we understand what is important to our associates, including their opinions on a variety of topics. We have made changes as a result of the survey results including the adoption of a volunteer time-off policy, a parental leave policy and improvements to internal communication processes. Our efforts are being recognized. For the past three years, the Bank was included in the “Best Banks to Work for” by American Banker magazine for our dedication to employee satisfaction. In 2020, a significant portion of our associates responded to one or more surveys of our associates.
Staffing Model. The majority of our employees are regular full-time associates. We also employ regular part-time associates and some seasonal/temporary associates.
Diversity & Inclusion. We believe that diversity of thought and experiences results in better outcomes and empowers our associates to make more meaningful contributions within our company and communities. We continue to learn and grow, and our current initiatives reflect our ongoing efforts around a more diverse, inclusive and equitable workplace.
In 2012, we formed a Diversity/Inclusion (DI) Council, designed to help educate and engage associates on a wide variety of inclusion topics - from ageism to race. In 2020, the DI Council was renamed, refocused and refreshed resulting in the DEI (Diversity, Equity, Inclusion) Leadership Council. As part of these focused efforts, we elevated the DEI Leadership Council to a formal internal leadership committee. In addition, we have designed our associate development programs with a view towards helping to create a more inclusive environment by giving associates of all backgrounds additional opportunities to succeed and contribute. These programs include:
•Career Acceleration Program - This program allows participants to experience a wide range of assignments by rotating through the various product partners and operational areas of the Company. Upon successful completion of the program, the associate is placed in a role that aligns with their strengths and talents and helps meet the needs of our organization.
•Gateway to a Banking Career - This program provides training for jobs as tellers and customer service representatives, job interview practice and job placement assistance. It is a joint effort with two other St.
Louis-based financial institutions. Upon successful completion of the program, participants receive a small stipend and are guaranteed an interview with one of the program sponsors.
•Empower & Enlighten - This program pairs our senior leaders with mid-level women and minority associates in order to foster an environment of mutual understanding, to remove generational boundaries and implicit biases, and to build the bridges that connect people to opportunity.
•Business Resource Groups - These groups bring together associates with a shared identity, interest or goal to create community and opportunities for improvement and engagement.
We track the representation of women and racial/ethnic minorities because we believe that diversity helps us build more effective teams and improve our client experience, leading to greater success for the Company and our shareholders. Our gender and race data is monitored by the Board. We are proud of our progress in this area, but we continue to strive to further diversify our workforce and strengthen our culture of inclusion.
Benefits. We are committed to offering a competitive total compensation package. We regularly compare compensation and benefits with peer companies and market data, making adjustments as needed to ensure compensation stays competitive. We also offer a wide array of benefits for our associates and their families including medical, dental and vision benefits as well as life insurance and short-term disability for all full-time associates.
Focusing on a Safe and Healthy Workplace. We value our associates and are committed to providing a safe and healthy workplace. Our formal Health & Safety (HS) Program consists of policies, procedures, and guidelines, and mandates all tasks be conducted in a safe and efficient manner, while complying with local, state and federal health and safety regulations, and special safety concerns. The HS program encompasses all facilities and operations and addresses on-site emergencies, injuries and illnesses, evacuation procedures, cell phone usage and general safety rules. Our employees are required to comply with company safety rules and expectations and are required to certify their understanding and compliance with company rules. In response to the coronavirus pandemic, we created an oversight committee and established a resource center to provide updates on our action plans, policies, and safety training.

---

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
ITEM 1A: RISK FACTORS
An investment in our common shares is subject to risks inherent to our business. Before making an investment decision, you should carefully consider the risks and uncertainties described below together with all of the other information included or incorporated by reference in this report. The value of our common shares could decline due to any of these risks, and you could lose all or part of your investment.
Risks Relating to the Pandemic
The global coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic has led to periods of significant volatility in financial, commodities and other markets and could harm our business and results of operations.
Given the ongoing and dynamic nature of the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, it is difficult to predict the impact of the pandemic on our business, and there is no guarantee that our efforts to address or mitigate the adverse impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic will be effective in the future. The impact to date has included periods of significant volatility in financial, commodities and other markets. This volatility, if it continues, could have an adverse impact on our customers and on our business, financial condition and results of operations as well as our growth strategy.
Our business is dependent upon the willingness and ability of our customers to conduct banking and other financial transactions. The spread of COVID-19 has caused and could continue to cause severe disruptions in the U.S. economy at large, and has resulted and may continue to result in disruptions to our customers’ businesses, and a decrease in consumer confidence and business generally. In addition, actions by US federal, state and local governments to address the pandemic, including travel bans, stay-at-home orders and school, business and entertainment venue closures, have had and may continue to have a significant adverse effect on our customers and the markets in which we conduct our business. The extent of further impacts resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic and other events beyond our control will depend on future developments, which are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted, including new information which may emerge concerning the severity of the COVID-19 pandemic and actions taken to contain the COVID-19 or its impact, among others.
Disruptions to our customers could result in increased risk of delinquencies, defaults, foreclosures and losses on our loans as well as declines in wealth management revenues. The escalation of the pandemic may also negatively impact regional economic conditions for a period of time, resulting in declines in local loan demand, liquidity of loan guarantors, loan collateral (particularly in real estate), loan originations and deposit availability. If the global response to contain COVID-19 escalates or is unsuccessful, we could experience a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
The Company has implemented restrictions on employee business travel, conversion of in-person meetings to virtual, and a work-from-home mandate. The Company has also worked with its customers to implement appropriate loan deferral strategies in certain circumstances. These actions in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, and similar actions by our vendors and business partners, have not materially impaired our ability to support our employees, conduct our business and serve our customers, but there is no assurance these actions will be sufficient to successfully mitigate the risks presented by COVID-19 or that our ability to operate will not be materially affected going forward. For instance, our business operations may be disrupted if key personnel or significant portions of our employees are unable to work effectively, including because of illness, quarantines, government actions, or other restrictions in connection with the COVID-19 pandemic. Similarly, if any of our vendors or business partners become unable to continue to provide their products and services, which we rely upon to maintain our day-to-day operations, our ability to serve our customers could be impacted.
Unpredictable future developments related to or resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic could materially and adversely affect our business and results of operations.
Because there have been no comparable recent global pandemics that resulted in similar global impact, we do not yet know the full extent of the COVID-19 pandemic’s effects on our business, operations, or the global economy as a whole. Any future development will be highly uncertain and cannot be predicted, including the scope and duration of the pandemic, the effectiveness of our work from home arrangements, third party providers’ ability to support our operation, and any actions taken by governmental authorities and other third parties in response to the pandemic.
We are continuing to monitor the COVID-19 pandemic and related risks, although the rapid development and fluidity of the situation precludes any specific prediction as to its ultimate impact on us. However, if the COVID-19 outbreak continues to spread or otherwise results in a continuation or worsening of the current economic and commercial environments, our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows as well as our regulatory capital and liquidity ratios could be materially adversely affected and many of the risks described in this Annual Report on Form 10-K may be heightened.
Risks Relating to Economic and Market Conditions
An economic downturn could adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
The U.S. economy experienced a recession during 2020 and unemployment rates remain elevated as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. A continuation of those recessionary conditions and/or negative developments in the domestic and international credit markets may significantly affect the markets in which we do business, the value of our loans and investments, and our ongoing operations, costs and profitability. If the communities in which we operate do not grow, or if prevailing economic conditions locally or nationally are unfavorable, our business may not succeed. Unpredictable economic conditions may have an adverse effect on the quality of our loan portfolio and our financial performance. Adverse changes in the economies in our market areas may have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. As a community bank, we bear increased risk of unfavorable local economic conditions. Moreover, we cannot give any assurance that we will benefit from any market growth or favorable economic conditions in our primary market areas even if they do occur.
We face potential risk from changes in governmental monetary policies.
The Company’s earnings are affected by domestic economic conditions and the monetary and fiscal policies of the United States government and its agencies. The Federal Reserve’s monetary policies have had, and are likely to continue to have, an important impact on the operating results of commercial banks through its power to implement national monetary policy in order, among other things, to curb inflation or combat a recession. The monetary policies of the Federal Reserve affect the levels of bank loans, investments, and deposits through its control over the issuance of United States government securities, its regulation of the discount rate applicable to member banks, and its influence over reserve requirements to which member banks are subject. The Company cannot predict the nature or impact of future changes in monetary and fiscal policies.
Legal, Regulatory and Tax Risks
Our participation in the SBA PPP loan program exposes us to risks related to noncompliance with the PPP, as well as litigation risk related to our administration of the PPP loan program, which could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
The Company is a participating lender in the PPP, a loan program administered through the SBA, that was created to help eligible businesses, organizations and self-employed persons fund their operational costs during the COVID-19 pandemic. Under this program, the SBA guarantees 100% of the amounts loaned under the PPP. The PPP opened on April 3, 2020 and was extended in January 2021; however, because of the short window between the passing of the CARES Act and the initial opening of the PPP, there is some ambiguity in the laws, rules and guidance regarding the operation of the PPP, which exposes the Company to risks relating to noncompliance with the PPP. For instance, other financial institutions have experienced litigation related to their process and procedures used in processing applications for the PPP. Any financial liability, litigation costs or reputational damage caused by PPP related litigation could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, the Company may be exposed to credit risk on PPP loans if a determination is made by the SBA that there is a deficiency in the manner in which the loan was originated, funded, or serviced. If a deficiency is identified, the SBA may deny its liability under the guaranty, reduce the amount of the guaranty, or, if it has already paid under the guaranty, seek recovery of any loss related to the deficiency from the Company.
SBA lending is an important part of our business since the acquisition of Seacoast. Our SBA lending program is dependent upon the U.S. federal government, and we face specific risks associated with originating SBA loans.
Our SBA lending program is dependent upon the U.S. federal government. As an approved participant in the SBA Preferred Lender’s Program (a “Preferred Lender”), we enable our clients to obtain SBA loans without being subject to the potentially lengthy SBA approval process necessary for lenders that are not Preferred Lenders. The SBA periodically reviews the lending operations of participating lenders to assess, among other things, whether the
lender exhibits prudent risk management. When weaknesses are identified, the SBA may request corrective actions or impose enforcement actions, including revocation of the Preferred Lender status. If we lose our status as a Preferred Lender, we may lose some or all of our customers to lenders who are Preferred Lenders, and as a result we could experience a material adverse effect to our financial results. Any changes to the SBA program, including but not limited to changes to the level of guarantee provided by the federal government on SBA loans, changes to program-specific rules impacting volume eligibility under the guaranty program, as well as changes to the program amounts authorized by Congress, may also have a material adverse effect on our business. In addition, any default by the U.S. government on its obligations or any prolonged government shutdown could, among other things, impede our ability to originate SBA loans or sell such loans in the secondary market, which could materially adversely affect our business, results of operations, and financial condition. When we originate SBA loans, we incur credit risk on the non-guaranteed portion of the loans, and if a customer defaults on a loan, we share any loss and recovery related to the loan pro-rata with the SBA. If the SBA establishes that a loss on an SBA guaranteed loan is attributable to significant technical deficiencies in the way the loan was originated, funded, or serviced by us, the SBA may seek recovery of the principal loss related to the deficiency.
Changes in government regulation and supervision may increase our costs or impact our ability to operate in certain lines of business.
Our operations are subject to extensive regulation by federal, state and local governmental authorities and are subject to various laws and judicial and administrative decisions imposing requirements and restrictions on part or all of our operations. Banking regulations are primarily intended to protect depositors’ funds, federal deposit insurance funds and the banking system as a whole, rather than shareholders. Because our business is highly regulated, the laws, rules, regulations and supervisory guidance and policies applicable to us are subject to regular modification and change and could result in an adverse impact on our results of operations.
We are subject to numerous laws designed to protect consumers, including the CRA and fair lending laws, and failure to comply with these laws could lead to a wide variety of sanctions.
The CRA, the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, the Fair Housing Act and other fair lending laws and regulations impose nondiscriminatory lending requirements on financial institutions. The CFPB, the U.S. Department of Justice and other federal agencies are responsible for enforcing these laws and regulations. A successful regulatory challenge to an institution’s performance under the CRA or fair lending laws and regulations could result in a wide variety of sanctions, including damages and civil money penalties, injunctive relief, restrictions on mergers and acquisitions activity, restrictions on expansion, and restrictions on entering new business lines. Private parties may also have the ability to challenge an institution’s performance under fair lending laws in private class action litigation. Such actions could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and future prospects.
We are subject to compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and other anti-money laundering statutes and regulations, and failure to comply with these laws could lead to a wide variety of sanctions.
The Bank Secrecy Act, the USA PATRIOT Act of 2001, and other laws and regulations require financial institutions, among other duties, to institute and maintain an effective anti-money laundering program and file suspicious activity and currency transaction reports when appropriate. In addition to other bank regulatory agencies, the federal Financial Crimes Enforcement Network of the Department of the Treasury is authorized to impose significant civil money penalties for violations of those requirements and has recently engaged in coordinated enforcement efforts with the state and federal banking regulators, as well as the U.S. Department of Justice, CFPB, Drug Enforcement Administration, and Internal Revenue Service. We are also subject to increased scrutiny of compliance with the rules enforced by the Office of Foreign Assets Control of the Department of the Treasury regarding, among other things, the prohibition of transacting business with, and the need to freeze assets of, certain persons and organizations identified as a threat to the national security, foreign policy or economy of the United States. If our policies, procedures and systems are deemed deficient, we would be subject to liability, including fines and regulatory actions, which may include restrictions on our ability to pay dividends and the necessity to obtain regulatory approvals to proceed with certain aspects of our business plan, including any acquisition plans. Failure to maintain and implement adequate programs to combat money laundering and terrorist financing could also have
serious reputational consequences for us. Any of these results could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and future prospects.
If the Company or the Bank incur losses that erode its capital, it may become subject to enhanced regulation or supervisory action.
Under federal and state laws and regulations pertaining to the safety and soundness of insured depository institutions, the Missouri Division of Finance, the Federal Reserve Board, and the FDIC have the authority to compel or restrict certain actions if the Company’s or the Bank’s capital should fall below adequate capital standards as a result of future operating losses, or if its bank regulators determine that it has insufficient capital. Among other matters, the corrective actions include but are not limited to requiring affirmative action to correct any conditions resulting from any violation or practice; directing an increase in capital and the maintenance of specific minimum capital ratios; restricting the Bank’s operations; limiting the rate of interest the bank may pay on brokered deposits; restricting the amount of distributions and dividends and payment of interest on its trust preferred securities; requiring the Bank to enter into informal or formal enforcement orders, including memoranda of understanding, written agreements and consent or cease and desist orders to take corrective action and enjoin unsafe and unsound practices; removing officers and directors and assessing civil monetary penalties; and taking possession of and closing and liquidating the Bank. These actions may limit the ability of the Bank or Company to execute its business plan and thus can lead to an adverse impact on the results of operations or financial position.
Financial Risks
Our allowance for credit losses may not be adequate to cover actual loan losses.
We maintain an allowance for credit losses, which is a reserve established through a provision for credit losses charged to expense, that represents management’s estimate of probable losses within the existing portfolio of loans. The allowance, in the judgment of management, is sufficient to reserve for estimated credit losses and risks inherent in the loan portfolio. We continue to monitor the adequacy of our loan credit allowance and may need to increase it if economic conditions deteriorate. In addition, bank regulatory agencies periodically review our allowance for credit losses and may require an increase in the provision for credit losses or the recognition of further loan charge-offs, based on judgments that can differ somewhat from those of our own management. In addition, if charge-offs in future periods exceed the allowance for loan losses (i.e., if the loan allowance is inadequate), we may need additional credit loss provisions to increase the allowance for loan losses. Additional provisions to increase the allowance for credit losses, should they become necessary, would result in a decrease in net income and a reduction in capital, and may have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
Increased regulatory oversight, uncertainty relating to the LIBOR calculation process and potential phasing out of LIBOR after 2021 may adversely affect the results of our operations.
On July 27, 2017, the United Kingdom’s Financial Conduct Authority, which regulates the LIBOR, announced that it intends to stop persuading or compelling banks to submit rates for the calculation of LIBOR after 2021. The announcement indicates that the continuation of LIBOR on the current basis cannot and will not be guaranteed after 2021. It is impossible to predict whether and to what extent banks will continue to provide LIBOR submissions to the administrator of LIBOR, whether LIBOR rates will cease to be published or supported before or after 2021 or whether any additional reforms to LIBOR may be enacted in the United Kingdom or elsewhere. Efforts in the United States to identify a set of alternative U.S. dollar reference interest rates include proposals by the ARRC of the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. Uncertainty as to the nature of alternative reference rates and as to potential changes in other reforms to LIBOR may adversely affect LIBOR rates and the value of LIBOR-based loans, and to a lesser extent securities in our portfolio, and may impact the availability and cost of hedging instruments and borrowings, including the rates we pay on our subordinated debentures. The Company has material contracts that are indexed to LIBOR. If LIBOR rates are no longer available, any successor or replacement interest rates may perform differently and we may incur significant costs to transition both our borrowing arrangements and the loan agreements with our customers from LIBOR, which may have an adverse effect on our results of operations. The impact of alternatives to LIBOR on the valuations, pricing and operation of our financial instruments is not yet known.
Our business is subject to interest rate risk and variations in interest rates may negatively affect our financial performance.
A substantial portion of our income is derived from the differential or “spread” between the interest earned on loans, investment securities, and other interest-earning assets, and the interest paid on deposits, borrowings, and other interest-bearing liabilities. Because of the differences in the maturities and repricing characteristics of our interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, changes in interest rates may not produce equivalent changes in interest income earned on interest-earning assets and interest paid on interest-bearing liabilities. Our assets and liabilities may react differently to changes in overall interest rates or conditions. Significant fluctuations in market interest rates could materially and adversely affect not only our net interest spread, but also our asset quality and loan origination volume, deposits, funding availability, and/or net income.
We may not be able to maintain our historical rate of growth or profitability, which could have a material adverse effect on our ability to successfully implement our business strategy.
Successful growth requires that we follow adequate loan underwriting standards, balance loan and deposit growth without increasing interest rate risk or compressing our net interest margin, maintain adequate capital at all times, produce investment performance results competitive with our peers and benchmarks, further diversify our revenue sources, meet the expectations of our clients and hire and retain qualified employees. If we do not manage our growth successfully, then our business, results of operations or financial condition may be adversely affected.
We may incur impairments to goodwill.
As of December 31, 2020, we had $261 million recorded as goodwill. We evaluate our goodwill for impairment at least annually. Significant negative industry or economic trends, including the lack of recovery in the market price of our common stock, or reduced future cash flows or disruptions to our business, could result in impairments to goodwill. Our valuation methodology for assessing impairment requires management to make judgments and assumptions based on historical experience and to rely on projections of future operating performance. We operate in competitive environments and projections of future operating results and cash flows may vary significantly from actual results. If our analysis results in impairment to goodwill, we would be required to record an impairment charge to earnings in our financial statements during the period in which such impairment is determined to exist. Any such change could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and stock price.
Declines in asset values may result in impairment charges and adversely impact the value of our investments and our financial performance and capital.
We hold an investment portfolio that includes, but is not limited to, government securities and agency mortgage-backed securities. Factors beyond our control can significantly influence the fair value of securities in our portfolio and can cause potential adverse changes to the fair value of these securities. These factors include, but are not limited to, rating agency actions in respect to the securities, defaults by the issuer or with respect to the underlying securities, changes in market interest rates and/or spread, and instability and other factors impacting the capital markets. Any of these factors, among others, could cause other-than-temporary impairments and realized or unrealized losses in future periods and declines in other comprehensive income (loss), which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and future prospects. The process for determining whether impairment of a security is other-than-temporary often requires complex, subjective judgments about whether there has been significant deterioration in the financial condition of the issuer, whether management has the intent or ability to hold a security for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in fair value, the future financial performance and liquidity of the issuer and any collateral underlying the security and other relevant factors.
We invest in mortgage-backed obligations and such obligations have been, and are likely to continue to be, impacted by market dislocations, declining home values and prepayment risk, which may lead to volatility in cash flow and market risk and declines in the value of our investment portfolio.
Our investment portfolio largely consists of mortgage-backed obligations primarily secured by pools of mortgages on single-family residences. The value of mortgage-backed obligations in our investment portfolio may fluctuate for several reasons, including (i) delinquencies and defaults on the mortgages underlying such obligations, due in part to high unemployment rates, (ii) falling home prices, (iii) lack of a liquid market for such obligations, (iv)
uncertainties in respect of government-sponsored enterprises such as the Federal National Mortgage Association (“Fannie Mae”) or the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (“Freddie Mac”), which guarantee such obligations, and (v) the expiration of government stimulus initiatives. If the value of homes were to materially decline, the fair value of the mortgage-backed obligations in which we invest may also decline. Any such decline in the fair value of mortgage-backed obligations, or perceived market uncertainty about their fair value, could adversely affect our financial position and results of operations. In addition, when we acquire a mortgage-backed security, we anticipate that the underlying mortgages will prepay at a projected rate, thereby generating an expected yield. Prepayment rates generally increase as interest rates fall and decrease when rates rise, but changes in prepayment rates are difficult to predict. In light of historically low interest rates, many of our mortgage-backed securities have a higher interest rate than prevailing market rates, resulting in a premium purchase price. In accordance with applicable accounting standards, we amortize the premium over the expected life of the mortgage-backed security. If the mortgage loans securing the mortgage-backed security prepay more rapidly than anticipated, we would have to amortize the premium on an accelerated basis, which would thereby adversely affect our profitability.
Credit and Liquidity Risks
Our loan and deposit portfolios are in certain markets which could result in increased concentration risk.
A majority of our loans are to businesses and individuals in the St. Louis, Kansas City, Phoenix, Los Alamos, Albuquerque, Santa Fe, San Diego, and Las Vegas metropolitan areas. These loans are funded by deposits in the same metropolitan areas. The regional economic conditions in areas where we conduct our business have an impact on the demand for our products and services as well as the ability of our clients to repay loans, the value of the collateral securing loans, and the stability of our deposit funding sources. Consequently, a decline in local economic conditions may adversely affect our earnings.
There are material risks involved in commercial lending that could adversely affect our business.
Our business plan calls for continued efforts to increase our assets invested in commercial loans. Our commercial loans include loans that are secured by real estate (commercial property, multi-family residential property, 1-4 family residential property, and construction and land). Commercial loans generally involve a higher degree of credit risk than residential mortgage loans due, in part, to their larger average size and less marketable collateral. In addition, unlike residential mortgage loans, commercial loans generally depend on the cash flow of the borrower’s business to service the debt. Adverse economic conditions or other factors affecting our target markets may have a greater adverse effect on us than on other financial institutions that have a more diversified client base. Increases in non-performing commercial loans could result in operating losses, impaired liquidity and erosion of our capital, and could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. Credit market tightening could adversely affect our commercial borrowers through declines in their business activities and adversely impact their overall liquidity through the diminished availability of other borrowing sources or otherwise.
Our loan portfolio includes loans secured by real estate, which could result in increased credit risk.
A portion of our portfolio is secured by real estate, and thus we face a high degree of risk from a downturn in our real estate markets. If real estate values would decline in our markets, our ability to recover on defaulted loans for which the primary reliance for repayment is on the real estate collateral by foreclosing and selling that real estate would then be diminished, and we would be more likely to suffer losses on defaulted loans.
Additionally, the state-specific foreclosure laws of the jurisdictions in which our real estate collateral is located may hinder our ability to timely or fully recover on defaulted loans secured by property in certain states. For example, some states in which our collateral is located are judicial foreclosure states. In judicial foreclosure states, all foreclosures must be processed through the court system. Due to this process, it may take up to a year or longer to foreclose on real estate collateral located in those states. Our ability to recover on defaulted loans secured by property in those states may be delayed and our recovery efforts are lengthened due to this process. In addition, other states have anti-deficiency statutes with regards to certain types of residential mortgage loans. Our ability to recover on defaulted loans secured by residential mortgages in anti-deficiency statute states may be limited to the fair value of the real estate securing the loan at the time of foreclosure.
Our commercial and industrial loans and sponsor finance loans are underwritten based primarily on cash flow, profitability and enterprise value of the client and are not fully covered by the value of tangible assets or collateral of the client. Consequently, if any of these transactions becomes non-performing, we could experience significant losses.
Cash flow lending involves lending money to a client based primarily on the expected cash flow, profitability and enterprise value of a client, with the value of any tangible assets as secondary protection. In some cases, these loans may have more leverage than traditional bank debt. In the case of our senior cash flow loans, we generally take a lien on substantially all of a client’s assets, but the value of those assets is typically substantially less than the amount of money we advance to the client under a cash flow transaction. In addition, some of our cash flow loans may be viewed as stretch loans, meaning they may be at leverage multiples that exceed traditional accepted bank lending standards for senior cash flow loans. Thus, if a cash flow transaction becomes non-performing, our primary recourse to recover some or all of the principal of our loan or other debt product would be to force the sale of all or part of the company as a going concern. Additionally, we may obtain equity ownership in a borrower as a means to recover some or all of the principal of our loan. The risks inherent in cash flow lending include, among other things:
•reduced use of or demand for the client’s products or services and, thus, reduced cash flow of the client to service the loan and other debt product as well as reduced value of the client as a going concern;
•inability of the client to manage working capital, which could result in lower cash flow;
•inaccurate or fraudulent reporting of our client’s positions or financial statements; and
•our client’s poor management of their business.
Additionally, many of our clients use the proceeds of our cash flow transactions to make acquisitions. Poorly executed or poorly conceived acquisitions can burden management, systems and the operations of the existing business, causing a decline in both the client’s cash flow and the value of its business as a going concern. In addition, many acquisitions involve new management teams taking over day-to-day operations of a business. These new management teams may fail to execute at the same level as the former management team, which could reduce the cash flow of the client available to service the loan or other debt product, as well as reduce the value of the client as a going concern.
Widespread financial difficulties or downgrades in the financial strength or credit ratings of life insurance providers could lessen the value of the collateral securing our life insurance premium finance loans and impair our financial condition and liquidity.
One of the specialized products we offer is financing whole life insurance premiums utilized in high net worth estate planning. These loans are primarily secured by the insurance policies financed by the loans, i.e., the obligations of the life insurance providers under those policies. Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organizations (“NRSROs”) such as Standard & Poor’s, Moody’s and A.M. Best evaluate the life insurance providers that are the payors on the life insurance policies that we finance. The value of our collateral could be materially impaired in the event there are widespread financial difficulties among life insurance providers or the NRSROs downgrade the financial strength ratings or credit ratings of the life insurance providers, indicating the NRSROs’ opinion that the life insurance provider’s ability to meet policyholder obligations is impaired, or the ability of the life insurance provider to meet the terms of its debt obligations is impaired. The value of our collateral is also subject to the risk that a life insurance provider could become insolvent. In particular, if one or more large nationwide life insurance providers were to fail, the value of our portfolio could be significantly negatively impacted. A significant downgrade in the value of the collateral supporting our premium finance business could impair our ability to create liquidity for this business, which, in turn could negatively impact our ability to expand.
Our construction and land development loans are based upon estimates of costs and value associated with the completed project. These estimates may be inaccurate and we may be exposed to more losses on these projects than on other loans.
Construction, land acquisition and development lending involves additional risks because funds are advanced based upon the projected value of the project, which is inherently uncertain prior to the project’s completion. Because of the uncertainties inherent in estimating construction costs, as well as the fair value of the completed project and the effects of governmental regulation of real property and the general effects of the national and local economies, it is relatively difficult to evaluate accurately the total funds required to complete a project and the related loan-to-value
ratio. As a result, construction loans often involve the disbursement of substantial funds with repayment dependent, in part, on the success of the ultimate project and the ability of the borrower to sell or lease the property, rather than the ability of the borrower or guarantor to repay principal and interest. If our appraisal of the value of the completed project proves to be overstated, we may have inadequate security for the repayment of the loan upon completion of construction of the project. If we are forced to foreclose on a project prior to or at completion due to a default, there can be no assurance that we will be able to recover all of the unpaid balance of, and accrued interest on, the loan or the related foreclosure, sale and holding costs. In addition, we may be required to fund additional amounts to complete the project and may have to hold the property for an unspecified period of time. If any of these events occur, our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows could be materially and adversely affected.
The ability of our borrowers to repay their loans may be adversely affected by an increase in market interest rates which could result in increased credit losses. These increased credit losses, where the Bank has retained credit exposure, could decrease our assets, net income and cash available.
The loans we make to our borrowers may bear interest at a variable or floating interest rate. When market interest rates increase, the amount of revenue borrowers need to service their debt also increases. Some borrowers may be unable to make their debt service payments. As a result, an increase in market interest rates will increase the risk of loan default. An increase in non-performing loans could result in a net loss of earnings from these loans, an increase in the provision for loan and covered loan losses, and an increase in loan charge-offs, all of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We are subject to environmental risks associated with owning real estate or collateral.
When a borrower defaults on a loan secured by real property, the Company may purchase the property in foreclosure or accept a deed to the property surrendered by the borrower. We may also take over the management of commercial properties whose owners have defaulted on loans. We may also own and lease premises where branches and other facilities are located. While we have lending, foreclosure and facilities guidelines intended to exclude properties with an unreasonable risk of contamination, hazardous substances could exist on some of the properties that the Company may own, manage or occupy. We face the risk that environmental laws could force us to clean up the properties at the Company’s expense. The cost of cleaning up or paying damages and penalties associated with environmental problems could increase our operating expenses. It may cost more to clean a property than the property is worth. We could also be liable for pollution generated by a borrower’s operations if the Company takes a role in managing those operations after a default. The Company may also find it difficult or impossible to sell these properties.
We may be obligated to indemnify certain counterparties in financing transactions we enter into pursuant to the New Markets Tax Credit Program.
We participate in and have previously been an “Allocatee” of the New Markets Tax Credit Program of the U.S. Department of the Treasury Community Development Financial Institutions Fund. Through this program, we provide our allocation to certain projects, which in turn for an equity investment from an Investor in the project generate federal tax credits to those investors. This equity, coupled with any debt or equity from the project sponsor is in turn invested in a certified community development entity for a period of at least seven years. Community development entities must use this capital to make loans to, or other investments in, qualified businesses in low-income communities in accordance with New Markets Tax Credit Program criteria. Investors receive an overall tax credit equal to 39% of their total equity investment, credited at a rate of five percent in each of the first three years and six percent in each of the final four years. However, after the exhaustion of all cure periods and remedies, the entire credit is subject to recapture if the certified community development entity fails to maintain its certified status, or if substantially all of the equity investment proceeds associated with the tax credits we allocate are no longer continuously invested in a qualified business that meets the New Markets Tax Credit Program criteria, or if the equity investment is redeemed prior to the end of the minimum seven-year term. As part of these financing transactions, we as the parent to Enterprise Financial CDE, LLC (“CDE”), provide customary indemnities to the tax credit investors, which require us to indemnify and hold harmless the investors in the event a credit recapture event occurs, unless the recapture is a result of action or inaction of the investor. No assurance can be given that these counterparties will not call upon us to discharge these obligations in the circumstances under which they are owed.
If this were to occur, the amount we may be required to pay a bank investor could be substantial and could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.
If we fail to comply with requirements of the federal New Markets Tax Credit program, the U.S. Department of the Treasury Community Development Financial Institutions Fund could seek any remedies available under its Allocation Agreement with us, and we could suffer significant reputational harm and be subject to greater scrutiny from banking regulators.
Because we have been designated as an “Allocatee” under the New Markets Tax Credit Program, we are required to provide allocation fund qualifying projects under the New Markets Tax Credit Program, and we are responsible for monitoring those projects, ensuring their ongoing compliance with the requirements of the New Markets Tax Credit Program and satisfying the various recordkeeping and reporting requirements under the New Markets Tax Credit Program. If we default in our obligations under the New Markets Tax Credit Program, the U.S. Department of the Treasury may revoke our participation in any other CDFI Fund programs, reallocate the new market tax credits that were originally allocated to us, and take any other remedial actions that it is empowered to take under the Allocation Agreement they have entered into with us with respect to the New Markets Tax Credit Program, with the full range of such remedies being unknown. If we were to default under the New Markets Tax Credit Program, we could suffer negative publicity in the communities in which we operate, and we could face greater scrutiny from federal and state bank regulators, especially with regard to our compliance with the CRA. These developments could have a material adverse impact on our reputation, business, financial condition, results of operations and liquidity.
Liquidity risk could impair our ability to fund operations and meet debt coverage obligations, and jeopardize our financial condition.
Liquidity is essential to our business. We are a holding company and depend on our subsidiaries for liquidity needs, including debt coverage requirements. An inability to raise funds through deposits, borrowings, the sale of investment securities and other sources could have a substantial material adverse effect on our liquidity. Our access to funding sources in amounts that are adequate to finance our activities could be impaired by factors that affect us specifically or the financial services industry in general. Factors that could detrimentally impact our access to liquidity sources include but are not limited to a decrease in the level of our business activity due to a market downturn, our failure to remain well-capitalized, or adverse regulatory action against us. Our ability to acquire deposits or to borrow could also be impaired by factors that are not specific to us, such as a severe disruption of the financial markets or negative views and expectations about the prospects for the financial services industry as a whole.
Our utilization of brokered deposits could adversely affect our liquidity and results of operations.
Since our inception, we have utilized both brokered and non-brokered deposits as a source of funds to support our growing loan demand and other liquidity needs. As a bank regulatory supervisory matter, reliance upon brokered deposits as a significant source of funding is discouraged. Brokered deposits may not be as stable as other types of deposits, and, in the future, those depositors may not renew their deposits when they mature, or we may have to pay a higher rate of interest to keep those deposits or may have to replace them with other deposits or with funds from other sources. Additionally, if the Bank ceases to be categorized as “well-capitalized” for bank regulatory purposes, it would not be able to accept, renew or roll over brokered deposits without a waiver from the FDIC. Our inability to maintain or replace these brokered deposits as they mature could adversely affect our liquidity and results of operations. Further, paying higher interest rates to maintain or replace these deposits could adversely affect our net interest margin and results of operations.
By engaging in derivative transactions, we are exposed to additional credit and market risk in our banking business.
We use interest rate swaps to help manage our interest rate risk in our banking business from recorded financial assets and liabilities when they can be demonstrated to effectively hedge a designated asset or liability and the asset or liability exposes us to interest rate risk or risks inherent in client related derivatives. We may use other derivative financial instruments to help manage other economic risks, such as liquidity and credit risk, including exposures that arise from business activities that result in the receipt or payment of future known or uncertain cash amounts, the value of which are determined by interest rates. We also have derivatives that result from a service we provide to
certain qualifying clients approved through our credit process, and therefore, these derivatives are not used to manage interest rate risk in our assets or liabilities. The Company does not enter into derivative financial instruments for trading purposes. Hedging interest rate risk is a complex process, requiring sophisticated models and routine monitoring. As a result of interest rate fluctuations, hedged assets and liabilities will appreciate or depreciate in market value. The effect of this unrealized appreciation or depreciation will generally be offset by income or loss on the derivative instruments that are linked to the hedged assets and liabilities. By engaging in derivative transactions, we are exposed to credit and market risk. If the counterparty fails to perform, credit risk exists to the extent of the fair value gain in the derivative. Market risk exists to the extent that interest rates change in ways that are significantly different from what we expected when we entered into the derivative transaction. The existence of credit and market risk associated with our derivative instruments could adversely affect our net interest income and, therefore, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and future prospects.
Competitive and Reputational Risks
We face significant competition.
The financial services industry, including but not limited to, commercial banking, mortgage banking, consumer lending, and home equity lending, is highly competitive, and we encounter strong competition for deposits, loans, and other financial services in all of our market areas in each of our lines of business. Our principal competitors include other commercial banks, savings banks, savings and loan associations, mutual funds, money market funds, finance companies, trust companies, technology companies, insurers, credit unions, and mortgage companies among others. Many of our non-bank competitors are not subject to the same degree of regulation as us and have advantages over us in providing certain services. Many of our competitors are significantly larger than we are and have greater access to capital and other resources. Also, our ability to compete effectively in our business is dependent on our ability to adapt successfully to regulatory and technological changes within the banking and financial services industry, generally. If we are unable to compete effectively, we will lose market share and our income from loans and other products may diminish.
Our ability to compete successfully depends on a number of factors, including, among other things:
•the ability to develop, maintain, and build upon long-term client relationships based on top quality service and high ethical standards;
•the scope, relevance, and pricing of products and services, including technological innovations to those products and services, offered to meet client needs and demands;
•the rate at which we introduce new products and services relative to our competitors;
•client satisfaction with our level of service; and/or
•industry and general economic trends.
Failure to perform in any of these areas could significantly weaken our competitive position, and could adversely affect our growth and profitability, which, in turn, could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
Technology is continually changing and we must effectively implement new innovations in providing services to our customers.
The financial services industry is undergoing rapid technological changes with frequent innovations in technology-driven products and services. In addition to better serving customers, the effective use of technology increases our efficiency and enables us to reduce costs. Our future success will depend, in part, upon our ability to address the needs of our customers using innovative methods, processes and technology to provide products and services that will satisfy customer demands for convenience as well as to create additional efficiencies in our operations as we continue to grow and expand our market areas. Many national vendors provide turn-key services to community banks, such as Internet banking and remote deposit capture, that allow smaller banks to compete with institutions that have substantially greater resources to invest in technological improvements. We may not be able, however, to effectively implement new technology-driven products and services or be successful in marketing these products and services to our customers.
Costs and levels of deposits are affected by competition that could increase our funding costs or liquidity risk.
We rely on bank deposits to be a low cost and stable source of funding. We compete with banks and other financial services companies for deposits. If our competitors raise the rates they pay on deposits, our funding costs may increase, either because we raise our rates to avoid losing deposits or because we lose deposits and must rely on more expensive sources of funding. Higher funding costs could reduce our net interest margin and net interest income and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Acquisition Risks
We have engaged in and may continue to engage in expansion through acquisitions, and these acquisitions present a number of risks related both to the acquisition transactions and to the integration of the acquired businesses.
The acquisition of other financial services companies or assets present risks to the Company in addition to those presented by the nature of the business acquired. Our earnings, financial condition, and prospects after a merger or acquisition depend in part on our ability to successfully integrate the operations of the acquired company. We may be unable to integrate operations successfully or to achieve expected results or cost savings.
Acquiring other banks or businesses involves various risks commonly associated with acquisitions, including, among other things:
◦potential exposure to unknown or contingent liabilities of the target company;
◦exposure to potential asset quality issues of the target company;
◦difficulty and expense of integrating the operations and personnel of the target company;
◦potential disruption to our business;
◦potential diversion of our management’s time and attention;
◦the possible loss of key employees and clients of the target company;
◦difficulty in estimating the value of the target company;
◦payment of a premium over book and market values that may dilute our tangible book value and earnings per share in the short- and long-term;
◦inability to realize the expected revenue increases, cost savings, increases in geographic or product presence, and/or other projected benefits; and/or
◦potential changes in banking or tax laws or regulations that may affect the target company.
We periodically evaluate merger and acquisition opportunities and conduct due diligence activities related to possible transactions with other financial institutions and financial services companies. As a result, merger or acquisition discussions and, in some cases, negotiations may take place, and future mergers or acquisitions involving cash, debt or equity securities may occur at any time. In addition to the risks noted above, potential acquisitions may incur additional costs for diligence or break-up fees, even if the transaction is not consummated.
We may be unable to successfully integrate new business lines into our existing operations.
From time to time, we may implement other new lines of business or offer new products or services within existing lines of business. There can be substantial risks and uncertainties associated with these efforts, particularly in instances where the markets are not fully developed. Although we continue to expend substantial managerial, operating and financial resources as our business grows, we may be unable to successfully continue the integration of new business lines, and price and profitability targets may not prove feasible. External factors such as compliance with regulations, competitive alternatives and shifting market preferences, may also impact the successful implementation of a new line of business or a new product or service. Furthermore, any new line of business and new product or service could have a significant impact on the effectiveness of our system of internal controls. Failure to successfully manage these risks in the development and implementation of new lines of business or new products or services could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
As we expand outside our current markets, we may encounter additional risks that may adversely affect us.
We are headquartered in Missouri, but have branch locations in the Kansas City, Phoenix, and San Diego metropolitan areas, as well as Northern New Mexico and Nevada. Over time, we may acquire or open locations in
other parts of the United States as well. In the course of these expansion activities, we may encounter significant risks, including unfamiliarity with the characteristics and business dynamics of new markets, increased marketing and administrative expenses and operational difficulties arising from our efforts to attract business in new markets, manage operations in noncontiguous geographic markets, comply with local laws and regulations and effectively and consistently manage personnel and business outside of the State of Missouri. If we are unable to manage these risks, our operations may be materially and adversely affected.
Technology and Cybersecurity Risks
A failure in or breach, or the inability to recognize a potential breach of our operational or security systems, or those of our third party service providers, including as a result of cyber-attacks, could disrupt our business, result in unintentional disclosure or misuse of confidential or proprietary information, damage our reputation, increase our costs and adversely impact our earnings.
As a financial institution, our operations rely heavily on the secure processing, storage and transmission of confidential and other information on our computer systems and networks. Any failure, interruption or breach in security or operational integrity of these systems could result in failures or disruptions in our internet banking system, treasury management products, check and document imaging, remote deposit capture systems, general ledger, and other systems. The security and integrity of our systems could be threatened by a variety of interruptions or information security breaches, including those caused by computer hacking, cyber-attacks, electronic fraudulent activity or attempted theft of financial assets. We cannot assure any such failures, interruption or security breaches will not occur, or if they do occur, that they will be adequately addressed. While we have certain protective policies and procedures in place, the nature and sophistication of the threats continue to evolve. We may be required to expend significant additional resources in the future to modify and enhance our protective measures. Additionally, we face the risk of operational disruption, failure, termination or capacity constraints of any of the third parties that facilitate our business activities, including exchanges, clearing agents, clearing houses or other financial intermediaries. Such parties could also be the source of an attack on, or breach of, our operational systems. Any failures, interruptions or security breaches in our information systems could damage our reputation, result in a loss of client business, result in a violation of privacy or other laws, or expose us to civil litigation, regulatory fines or losses not covered by insurance.
We rely on third-party vendors to provide key components of our business infrastructure.
We rely heavily on third-party service providers for much of our communications, information, operating and financial control systems technology, including relationship management, mobile banking, general ledger, investment, deposit, loan servicing and loan origination systems. While we have selected these third-party vendors carefully and perform ongoing monitoring, we do not control their actions. Any problems caused by these third parties, including as a result of inadequate or interrupted service, could adversely affect our ability to deliver products and services to our clients and otherwise conduct our business. Financial or operational difficulties of a third-party vendor could also hurt our operations if those difficulties interfere with the vendor’s ability to serve us, and replacing these third-party vendors could result in significant delay and expense. Accordingly, use of such third parties creates an unavoidable inherent risk to our business operations as well as reputational risk.
Risks Relating to Our Common Stock
The price of our common stock may be volatile or may decline.
The trading price of our common stock may fluctuate widely as a result of a number of factors, many of which are outside our control. In addition, the stock market is subject to fluctuations in the share prices and trading volumes that affect the market prices of the shares of many companies. These broad market fluctuations could make it more difficult for you to resell your common stock when you want and at prices you find attractive.
Our stock price can fluctuate significantly in response to a variety of factors including, among other things:
◦actual or anticipated quarterly fluctuations in our operating results and financial condition;
◦changes in revenue or earnings estimates or publication of research reports and recommendations by financial analysts;
◦failure to meet analysts’ revenue or earnings estimates;
◦speculation in the press or investment community;
◦strategic actions by us or our competitors, such as acquisitions or restructurings;
◦actions by institutional shareholders;
◦fluctuations in the stock prices and operating results of our competitors;
◦general market conditions and, in particular, developments related to market conditions for the financial services industry;
◦proposed or adopted regulatory changes or developments;
◦anticipated or pending investigations, proceedings or litigation that involve or affect us; and/or
◦domestic and international economic factors unrelated to our performance.
The stock market and, in particular, the market for financial institution stocks, has historically experienced significant volatility. As a result, the market price of our common stock may be volatile. In addition, the trading volume in our common stock may fluctuate more than usual and cause significant price variations to occur. The trading price of the shares of our common stock and the value of our other securities will depend on many factors, which may change from time to time, including, without limitation, our financial condition, performance, creditworthiness and prospects, future sales of our equity or equity related securities, and other factors identified in this annual report and other reports by the Company. In some cases, the markets have produced downward pressure on stock prices and credit availability for certain issuers without regard to those issuers’ underlying financial strength or operating results. A significant decline in our stock price could result in substantial losses for individual shareholders and could lead to costly and disruptive securities litigation.
The trading volume in our common stock is less than that of other larger financial institutions.
Although our common stock is listed for trading on the Nasdaq Global Select Market, its trading volume may be less than that of other, larger financial services companies. A public trading market having the desired characteristics of depth, liquidity and orderliness depends on the presence in the marketplace of willing buyers and sellers of our common stock at any given time, a factor over which we have no control. During any period of lower trading volume of our common stock, significant sales of shares of our common stock or the expectation of these sales could cause our common stock price to fall.
An investment in our common stock is not insured and you could lose the value of your entire investment.
An investment in our common stock is not a savings account, deposit or other obligation of our bank subsidiary, any non-bank subsidiary or any other bank, and such investment is not insured or guaranteed by the FDIC or any other governmental agency. As a result, if you acquire our common stock, you may lose some or all of your investment.
Our ability to pay dividends is limited by various statutes and regulations and depends primarily on the Bank’s ability to distribute funds to us and is also limited by various statutes and regulations. The Company depends on payments from the Bank, including dividends, management fees and payments under tax sharing agreements, for substantially all of the Company’s liquidity requirements. Federal and state regulations limit the amount of dividends and the amount of payments that the Bank may make to the Company under tax sharing agreements. In certain circumstances, the Missouri Division of Finance, FDIC, or Federal Reserve Board could restrict or prohibit the Bank from distributing dividends or making other payments to us. In the event that the Bank was restricted from paying dividends to the Company or making payments under the tax sharing agreement, the Company may not be able to service its debt, pay its other obligations or pay dividends on its common stock. If we are unable or determine not to pay dividends on our outstanding equity securities, the market price of such securities could be materially adversely affected.
There can be no assurance of any future dividends on our common stock.
Holders of our common stock are entitled to receive dividends only when, as and if declared by the Board of Directors. Although we have historically paid cash dividends on our common stock, we are not required to do so.
Our outstanding debt securities, related to our trust preferred securities, restrict our ability to pay dividends on our capital stock.
We have outstanding subordinated debentures issued to statutory trust subsidiaries, which have issued and sold preferred securities in the Trusts to investors.
If we are unable to make payments on any of our subordinated debentures for more than 20 consecutive quarters, we would be in default under the governing agreements for such securities and the amounts due under such agreements would be immediately due and payable. Additionally, if for any interest payment period we do not pay interest in respect of the subordinated debentures (which will be used to make distributions on the trust preferred securities), or if for any interest payment period we do not pay interest in respect of the subordinated debentures, or if any other event of default occurs, then we generally will be prohibited from declaring or paying any dividends or other distributions, or redeeming, purchasing or acquiring, any of our capital securities, including the common stock, during the next succeeding interest payment period applicable to any of the subordinated debentures, or next succeeding interest payment period, as the case may be.
Moreover, any other financing agreements that we enter into in the future may limit our ability to pay cash dividends on our capital stock, including the common stock. In the event that our existing or future financing agreements restrict our ability to pay dividends in cash on the common stock, we may be unable to pay dividends in cash on the common stock unless we can refinance amounts outstanding under those agreements. In addition, if we are unable or determine not to pay interest on our subordinated debentures, the market price of our common stock could be materially or adversely affected.
Anti-takeover provisions could negatively impact our shareholders.
Provisions of Delaware law and of our certificate of incorporation, as amended, and bylaws, as well as various provisions of federal and Missouri state law applicable to bank and bank holding companies, could make it more difficult for a third party to acquire control of us or have the effect of discouraging a third party from attempting to acquire control of us. We are subject to Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, which would make it more difficult for another party to acquire us without the approval of our Board of Directors. Additionally, our certificate of incorporation, as amended, authorizes our Board of Directors to issue preferred stock which could be issued as a defensive measure in response to a takeover proposal. In the event of a proposed merger, tender offer or other attempt to gain control of the Company, our Board of Directors would have the ability to readily issue available shares of preferred stock as a method of discouraging, delaying or preventing a change in control of the Company. Such issuance could occur regardless of whether our shareholders favorably view the merger, tender offer or other attempt to gain control of the Company. These and other provisions could make it more difficult for a third party to acquire us even if an acquisition might be in the best interests of our shareholders. Although we have no present intention to issue any shares of our authorized preferred stock, there can be no assurance that the Company will not do so in the future.
General Risk Factors
Climate-related Risk
Political and social attention to the issue of climate change has increased. Federal and state legislatures and regulatory agencies continue to propose and advance numerous legislative and regulatory initiatives seeking to mitigate the effects of climate change. As a financial institution, it is unclear how future government regulations and shifts in business trends resulting from increased concern about climate change will affect our operations; however, natural or man-made disasters and severe weather events may cause operational disruptions and damage to both our properties and properties securing our loans. Losses resulting from these disasters and severe weather events may make it more difficult for borrowers to timely repay their loans. If these events occur, we may experience a decrease in the value of our loan portfolio and our revenue, and may incur additional operational expenses, each of which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

---

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
ITEM 1B: UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
None.

---

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
ITEM 2: PROPERTIES
Our executive offices are located at 150 North Meramec Avenue, Clayton, Missouri, 63105. As of December 31, 2020, we had 19 banking locations, and three limited service facilities in the St. Louis metropolitan area, seven banking locations in the Kansas City metropolitan area, two banking locations in the Phoenix metropolitan area, six banking locations in New Mexico, four banking locations in the San Diego metropolitan area, and one banking location in the Las Vegas metropolitan area. Additionally, the Company has a limited network of SBA loan production offices and deposit production offices in various states. We own or lease our facilities and believe all of our properties are in good condition to meet our business needs.

---

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
ITEM 3: LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
The Company and its subsidiaries are, from time to time, parties to various legal proceedings arising out of their businesses. Management believes that there are no such legal proceedings pending or threatened against the Company or its subsidiaries in the ordinary course of business, directly, indirectly, or in the aggregate that, if determined adversely, would have a material adverse effect on the business, consolidated financial condition, results of operations or cash flows of the Company or any of its subsidiaries.
For more information on our legal proceedings, see “Item 8. Note 14 - Litigation and Other Contingencies” in this report.

---

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURE
ITEM 4: MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
Not applicable.
PART II

---

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY
ITEM 5: MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
Market for Our Common Stock
The Company’s common stock trades on the Nasdaq Global Select Market under the symbol “EFSC.” As of February 17, 2021, the Company had 1,480 registered shareholders of common stock. The number of holders of record does not represent the actual number of beneficial owners of our common stock because securities dealers and others frequently hold shares in “street name” for the benefit of individual owners who have the right to vote shares.
Dividends
The holders of shares of our common stock are entitled to receive dividends when declared by our Board of Directors out of funds legally available for the purpose of paying dividends. Our Board of Directors approved the Company’s quarterly dividend of $0.18 per common share for the first quarter of 2021, payable on March 31, 2021 to shareholders of record as of March 15, 2021. We anticipate continuing a regular quarterly cash dividend. However, we have no obligation to pay dividends and we may change our dividend policy at any time without notice to our shareholders.
Our ability to pay dividends is substantially dependent upon the ability of our subsidiaries to pay cash dividends to us. Information on regulatory restrictions on our ability to pay dividends is set forth in “Part I, Item 1. Business - Supervision and Regulation - Financial Holding Company - Dividend Restrictions.” The amount of dividends, if any, that may be declared by the Company also depends on many other factors, including future earnings, bank
regulatory capital requirements and business conditions as they affect the Company and its subsidiaries. As a result, no assurance can be given that dividends will be paid in the future with respect to our common stock.
Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans
For more information on our equity compensation plans, see “Item 8. Note 16 - Stockholders’ Equity and Compensation Plans” and “Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters” in this report, which are incorporated herein by reference.
Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities and Use of Proceeds
None.
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
None.
Stock Performance Graph
The following graph compares the cumulative total shareholder return on the Company’s common stock from December 31, 2015 through December 31, 2020. The graph compares the Company’s common stock with the Nasdaq Composite Index (U.S. companies), and the SNL Bank $5B-$10B Index. The graph assumes an investment of $100.00 in the Company’s common stock and each index at the respective closing price on December 31, 2015 and reinvestment of all quarterly dividends. The investment is measured as of each subsequent fiscal year end. There is no assurance that the Company’s common stock performance will continue in the future with the same or similar results as shown in the graph.
Period Ending December 31,
Index 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Enterprise Financial Services Corp $ 100.00 $ 153.67 $ 163.06 $ 137.22 $ 178.36 $ 132.29
Nasdaq Composite Index $ 100.00 $ 108.87 $ 141.13 $ 137.12 $ 187.44 $ 271.64
SNL Bank $5B-$10B Index $ 100.00 $ 143.27 $ 142.73 $ 129.17 $ 160.06 $ 145.37
*Source: S&P Global Market Intelligence. Used with permission. All rights reserved.

---

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
ITEM 6: SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
Not applicable.

---

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
ITEM 7: MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Introduction
The objective of this section is to provide an overview of the results of operations and financial condition of the Company by focusing on changes in certain key measures from year to year. It should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and related Notes contained in “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data,” and other financial data presented elsewhere in this report, particularly the information regarding the Company’s business operations described in Item 1. A detailed discussion comparing 2019 and 2018 results is incorporated herein by reference to Item 7 of the Company’s 2019 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on February 22, 2020.
Executive Summary
Our Company offers a broad range of business and personal banking services including wealth management services. Lending services include commercial and industrial, commercial real estate, real estate construction and development, residential real estate, and other loans. A wide variety of deposit products and a complete suite of treasury management and international trade services complement our lending capabilities. Tax-credit brokerage activities consist of the acquisition of Federal and State tax credits and the sale of these tax credits. The Company’s results of operations are also affected by prevailing economic conditions, competition, government policies and other actions of regulatory agencies.
The Company closed its acquisition of Seacoast and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Seacoast Commerce Bank, on November 12, 2020. Seacoast operated five full-service retail and commercial banking offices in California and Nevada as well as SBA loan production offices and deposit production offices in Arizona, California, Colorado, Illinois, Indiana, Massachusetts, Michigan, Nevada, Ohio, Oregon, Texas, Utah, and Washington. The Company closed its acquisition of Trinity and its wholly-owned subsidiary, LANB, on March 8, 2019. Trinity operated six full-service retail and commercial banking offices in Los Alamos, Santa Fe, and Albuquerque, New Mexico. The results of operations of Seacoast and Trinity are included in our consolidated results in periods after the respective acquisition dates and are excluded from preceding periods. See “Item 8. Note 2 - Acquisitions” for more information.
The following table summarizes the significant components of the Seacoast and Trinity transactions at the date of acquisition:
Seacoast Trinity
($ in thousands) November 12, 2020 March 8, 2019
Loans, net $ 1,190,441 $ 684,314
Securities 428,096
Total assets acquired 1,312,037 1,232,539
Deposits 1,081,006 1,081,187
Total liabilities assumed 1,193,595 1,116,377
Consideration paid:
Cash $ 1,630 $ 37,275
Common stock 167,035 171,885
Total consideration paid $ 168,665 $ 209,160
Financial Performance Highlights
Below are highlights of our financial performance for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018.
($ in thousands, except per share data) Year ended December 31,
2020 2019 2018
EARNINGS
Total interest income $ 304,779 $ 305,134 $ 237,802
Total interest expense 34,778 66,417 45,897
Net interest income 270,001 238,717 191,905
Provision for credit losses 65,398 6,372 6,644
Net interest income after provision for loan losses 204,603 232,345 185,261
Total noninterest income 54,503 49,176 38,347
Total noninterest expense 167,159 165,485 119,031
Income before income tax expense 91,947 116,036 104,577
Income tax expense 17,563 23,297 15,360
Net income $ 74,384 $ 92,739 $ 89,217
Basic earnings per share $ 2.76 $ 3.56 $ 3.86
Diluted earnings per share 2.76 3.55 3.83
Return on average assets 0.90 % 1.35 % 1.64 %
Return on average common equity 8.24 % 11.66 % 15.46 %
Return on average tangible common equity1
11.23 % 16.08 % 19.83 %
Net interest margin (fully tax equivalent) 3.56 % 3.80 % 3.82 %
Efficiency ratio 51.51 % 57.48 % 51.70 %
Core efficiency ratio1
50.96 % 52.36 % 52.04 %
Dividend payout ratio 26.61 % 17.87 % 12.16 %
Book value per common share $ 34.57 $ 32.67 $ 26.47
Tangible book value per common share1
$ 25.48 $ 23.76 $ 20.95
Average common equity to average assets 10.94 % 11.54 % 10.61 %
Tangible common equity to tangible assets1
8.40 % 8.89 % 8.66 %
At or for the year ended December 31,
2020 2019 2018
ASSET QUALITY
Net charge-offs $ 1,907 $ 6,410 $ 5,683
Nonperforming loans 38,507 26,425 16,745
Classified assets 123,808 85,897 70,126
Nonperforming loans to total loans 0.53 % 0.50 % 0.38 %
Nonperforming assets to total assets 0.45 % 0.45 % 0.30 %
Allowance for loan losses to total loans 1.89 % 0.81 % 1.00 %
Net charge-offs to average loans 0.03 % 0.13 % 0.26 %
1Non-GAAP measures. A reconciliation has been included in this MD&A section under the caption “Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures.”
The Company noted the following trends during 2020:
•The Company reported net income of $74.4 million, or $2.76 per diluted share for 2020, compared to $92.7 million, or $3.55 per diluted share for 2019. An increase in operating revenue (net interest income and
noninterest income) of $36.6 million in 2020 was offset by a $59.0 million increase in the provision for credit losses. The increase in the provision for credit losses was primarily due to the forward-looking CECL methodology and the worsening outlook for forecasted economic factors.
•Net interest income for 2020 totaled $270.0 million, an increase of $31.3 million, or 13%, compared to $238.7 million for 2019. PPP interest and fee income totaled $19.6 million in 2020. The Seacoast acquisition added $8.0 million and the Company benefited from a full year of Trinity operations in 2020 compared to a partial year in 2019.
•Net interest margin decreased 24 basis points to 3.56% during 2020, compared to 3.80% in 2019. The decrease was primarily due to a decline in interest rates during 2020 that reduced the earning asset yield to 4.02% from 4.85%, coupled with the shift in 2020 in earning assets to lower yielding PPP loans and short-term investments. The one-month and three-month LIBOR rates were 0.14% and 0.24%, respectively, at December 31, 2020, compared to 1.76% and 1.97%, respectively, at December 31, 2019. At December 31, 2020, the Company had $2.5 billion in loans indexed to LIBOR.
•Noninterest income increased $5.3 million, or 11%, to $54.5 million in 2020 compared to $49.2 million in 2019. This improvement was primarily due to a $2.3 million increase in mortgage revenue on higher volumes and a $2.5 million increase in income from community development investments.
•Noninterest expenses totaled $167.2 million for 2020, an increase of $1.7 million, or 1%, compared to 2019. The operations of Seacoast added $6.0 million of noninterest expense in 2020, in addition to $4.2 million of merger-related expenses. The Company also incurred a full year of Trinity operating expenses in 2020, compared to a partial year in 2019. These increases were offset by a reduction in the Trinity merger expenses of $18.0 million in 2019. The Company’s efficiency ratio was 51.5% in 2020, compared to 57.5% for the prior year. The decrease in 2020 was primarily due to the merger-related expenses. The Company’s core efficiency ratio1 was 51.0% in 2020, compared to 52.4% for the prior year.
•The Company’s effective tax rate was 19.1% for the year ended December 31, 2020 compared to 20.1% in 2019. The lower rate in 2020 primarily resulted from increased benefits from tax exempt income.
1Non-GAAP measures. A reconciliation has been included in this MD&A section under the caption “Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures.”
2020 Significant Transactions
During 2020, we announced the following significant transactions:
•On November 12, 2020, the Company announced the completion of its acquisition of Seacoast which was merged with and into the Company, and Seacoast Commerce Bank, Seacoast’s wholly-owned subsidiary, merged with and into the Bank. Aggregate consideration at closing was 5.0 million shares of Company common stock to Seacoast shareholders. The overall transaction had a value of $169 million.
•Assisted new and existing customers with navigating and accessing PPP loans through the approval of approximately 3,900 loans totaling $859 million.
•In May 2020, the Company issued $63.3 million of 5.75% fixed-to-floating rate subordinated notes due in 2030. The notes are callable beginning in 2025 and are included in tier 2 capital.
•The Company repurchased 456,251 of its common shares at a weighted-average share price of $33.64. At December 31, 2020, there were 95,907 shares remaining to be purchased under its existing share repurchase plan.
•Dividends paid in 2020 of $0.72 per share increased $0.10 per share, or 16%, compared to $0.62 per share in 2019.
2019 Significant Transactions
During 2019, we announced the following significant transactions:
•On March 8, 2019, the Company announced the completion of its acquisition of Trinity which was merged with and into the Company, and LANB, Trinity’s wholly-owned subsidiary, merged with and into the Bank. Aggregate consideration at closing was 4.0 million shares of Company common stock and $37.3 million cash paid to Trinity shareholders. The overall transaction had a value of $209.2 million.
•The Company repurchased 396,737 of its common shares at a weighted-average share price of $39.13, pursuant to its publicly announced share repurchase program.
•Dividends paid in 2019 of $0.62 per share increased $0.15 per share, or 32%, compared to $0.47 per share in 2018.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Net Interest Income
Average Balance Sheet
The following table presents, for the periods indicated, certain information related to our average interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, as well as, the corresponding interest rates earned and paid, all on a tax equivalent basis.
Year ended December 31,
2020 2019 2018
($ in thousands) Average Balance Interest
Income/Expense Average
Yield/
Rate Average Balance Interest
Income/Expense Average
Yield/
Rate Average Balance Interest
Income/Expense Average
Yield/
Rate
Assets
Interest-earning assets:
Taxable loans1
$ 6,035,178 $ 268,914 4.46 % $ 4,988,985 $ 268,012 5.37 % $ 4,187,988 $ 215,791 5.15 %
Tax-exempt loans2
36,318 1,759 4.84 29,583 1,852 6.26 34,371 1,889 5.50
Total loans 6,071,496 270,673 4.46 5,018,568 269,864 5.38 4,222,359 217,680 5.16
Taxable investments in debt and equity securities 1,016,100 25,524 2.51 1,064,913 30,085 2.83 712,227 18,375 2.58
Non-taxable investments in debt and equity securities2
350,501 11,151 3.18 131,161 4,668 3.56 40,038 1,426 3.56
Short-term investments 228,760 620 0.27 107,433 2,128 1.98 66,771 1,141 1.71
Total securities and short-term investments 1,595,361 37,295 2.34 1,303,507 36,881 2.83 819,036 20,942 2.56
Total interest-earning assets 7,666,857 307,968 4.02 6,322,075 306,745 4.85 5,041,395 238,622 4.73
Noninterest-earning assets 587,057 572,216 395,568
Total assets $ 8,253,914 $ 6,894,291 $ 5,436,963
Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity
Interest-bearing liabilities:
Interest-bearing transaction accounts $ 1,494,364 $ 2,101 0.14 % $ 1,286,641 $ 7,592 0.59 % $ 827,155 $ 3,643 0.44 %
Money market accounts 1,977,826 7,754 0.39 1,608,349 26,267 1.63 1,488,238 19,361 1.30
Savings 589,832 279 0.05 489,310 841 0.17 206,286 597 0.29
Certificates of deposit 676,889 10,915 1.61 799,079 15,156 1.90 653,486 10,168 1.56
Total interest-bearing deposits 4,738,911 21,049 0.44 4,183,379 49,856 1.19 3,175,165 33,769 1.06
Subordinated debentures and notes 179,534 9,885 5.51 136,950 7,507 5.48 118,129 5,798 4.91
FHLB advances 241,635 2,673 1.11 287,474 6,668 2.32 271,493 5,556 2.05
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase 206,338 542 0.26 169,179 1,246 0.74 170,963 755 0.44
Other borrowings 32,147 629 1.96 32,392 1,140 3.52 773 19 2.46
Total interest-bearing liabilities 5,398,565 34,778 0.64 4,809,374 66,417 1.38 3,736,523 45,897 1.23
Noninterest bearing liabilities:
Demand deposits 1,854,982 1,228,832 1,086,863
Other liabilities 97,492 60,608 36,617
Total liabilities 7,351,039 6,098,814 4,860,003
Shareholders' equity 902,875 795,477 576,960
Total liabilities & shareholders' equity $ 8,253,914 $ 6,894,291 $ 5,436,963
Net interest income $ 273,190 $ 240,328 $ 192,725
Net interest spread 3.38 % 3.47 % 3.50 %
Net interest margin (tax equivalent) 3.56 3.80 3.82
1Average balances include non-accrual loans. Interest income includes net loan fees of $18.4 million, $4.5 million, and $4.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018 respectively. The increase in loan fees in 2020 is due to PPP fees of $13.8 million.
2Non-taxable income is presented on a fully tax-equivalent basis using a 24.7% tax rate. The tax-equivalent adjustments were $3.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2020, $1.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2019, and $0.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2018.
Rate/Volume
The following table sets forth, on a tax-equivalent basis for the periods indicated, a summary of the changes in interest income and interest expense resulting from changes in yield/rates and volume.
2020 compared to 2019 2019 compared to 2018
Increase (decrease) due to Increase (decrease) due to
($ in thousands) Volume1
Rate2
Net Volume1
Rate2
Net
Interest earned on:
Taxable loans $ 50,916 $ (50,014) $ 902 $ 38,793 $ 13,428 $ 52,221
Tax-exempt loans3
374 (467) (93) (282) 245 (37)
Taxable investments in debt and equity securities (1,334) (3,227) (4,561) 9,825 1,885 11,710
Non-taxable investments in debt and equity securities3
7,027 (544) 6,483 3,243 (1) 3,242
Short-term investments 1,228 (2,736) (1,508) 782 205 987
Total interest-earning assets 58,211 (56,988) 1,223 52,361 15,762 68,123
Interest paid on:
Interest-bearing transaction accounts $ 1,063 $ (6,554) $ (5,491) $ 2,450 $ 1,499 $ 3,949
Money market accounts 4,970 (23,483) (18,513) 1,659 5,247 6,906
Savings 145 (707) (562) 562 (318) 244
Certificates of deposit (2,142) (2,099) (4,241) 2,515 2,473 4,988
Subordinated debentures and notes 2,345 33 2,378 986 723 1,709
FHLB advances (933) (3,062) (3,995) 340 772 1,112
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase 229 (933) (704) (8) 499 491
Other borrowed funds (9) (502) (511) 1,110 11 1,121
Total interest-bearing liabilities 5,668 (37,307) (31,639) 9,614 10,906 20,520
Net interest income $ 52,543 $ (19,681) $ 32,862 $ 42,747 $ 4,856 $ 47,603
1Change in volume multiplied by yield/rate of prior period.
2Change in yield/rate multiplied by volume of prior period.
3Nontaxable income is presented on a fully tax equivalent basis using a 24.7% tax rate.
NOTE: The change in interest due to both rate and volume has been allocated to rate and volume changes in proportion to the relationship of the absolute dollar amounts of the change in each.
Net interest income (on a tax equivalent basis) was $273.2 million for 2020, compared to $240.3 million for 2019, an increase of $32.9 million, or 14%. Total interest income increased $1.2 million and total interest expense decreased $31.6 million. The increase in net interest income in 2020 was primarily due to higher loan volumes, which benefited from PPP and the Seacoast acquisition, and a decline in the interest rate on interest-bearing liabilities. A decline in the yield on earning assets offset the benefit provided by higher loan volumes and a lower cost of funds.
The tax-equivalent net interest margin was 3.56% for 2020, compared to 3.80% for 2019. The primary driver of the decline in net interest margin from 2019 to 2020 was a decline in short-term rates. The federal funds target rate declined 150 basis points in 2020 and one-month LIBOR declined 162 basis points. The decline in short-term rates reduced the yield on the Company’s variable-rate loan portfolio, which represents approximately 60% of total loans. In addition, a shift in the composition of the loan portfolio to lower yielding PPP loans reduced the net interest margin. The yield on PPP loans was 3.47% on an average balance of $563.6 million in 2020. Excluding PPP, the yield on the loan portfolio was 4.56%. In response to the decline in interest rates, the Company proactively reduced the cost of certain managed money market and interest-bearing transaction accounts.
Average interest-earning assets increased $1.3 billion, or 21%, to $7.7 billion for the year ended December 31, 2020. The increase was due to growth in average total loans of $1.1 billion, or 21%, primarily due to PPP loans. Average securities and short-term investments increased $291.9 million, or 22%. Securities represented 18% of earnings assets in 2020 and 19% in 2019. Short-term securities increased from 2% to 3% of earning assets, primarily due to higher liquidity from deposit growth. Due to volume growth in the balance sheet, interest income on earning assets increased $58.2 million. Interest income on interest-earnings assets decreased $57.0 million primarily due the decline in interest rates in 2020 compared to 2019.
Average interest-bearing liabilities increased $589.2 million, or 12% for the year ended December 31, 2020, . The increase in average interest-bearing liabilities resulted from $555.5 million of growth in interest-bearing deposits primarily due to customer liquidity provided by PPP loans. While average interest-bearing liabilities increased, interest expense declined $31.6 million due to a 75 basis point decline in the cost of deposits. The Company issued $63.3 million of subordinated debentures in May 2020 at 5.75% and reduced its use of FHLB advances. The total cost of interest-bearing liabilities declined 74 basis points, from 1.38% in 2019 to 0.64% in 2020. Volume growth in deposits and other borrowings used to fund asset growth increased interest expense in 2020 by $5.7 million. Interest expense on interest-bearing liabilities decreased $37.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2020 due to lower rates.
Noninterest Income
The following table presents a comparative summary of the major components of noninterest income for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2020:
Year ended December 31, Change from
($ in thousands) 2020 2019 2018 2020 vs. 2019 2019 vs. 2018
Service charges on deposit accounts $ 11,717 $ 12,801 $ 11,749 $ (1,084) $ 1,052
Wealth management revenue 9,732 9,932 8,241 (200) 1,691
Card services revenue 9,481 9,154 6,686 327 2,468
Tax credit income 6,611 5,393 2,820 1,218 2,573
Miscellaneous income 16,962 11,896 8,851 5,066 3,045
Total noninterest income $ 54,503 $ 49,176 $ 38,347 $ 5,327 $ 10,829
Noninterest income increased $5.3 million, or 11%, in 2020 compared to 2019. This improvement was primarily due to higher income from tax credit income and other miscellaneous income, primarily mortgage revenue, community development investment fees, swap fees, and BOLI income. Due to the slowdown in economic activity in 2020 caused by the pandemic, volumes on card and deposit services were down. Conversely, mortgage revenue was strong as customers took advantage of low, long-term mortgage rates. Similarly, tax credit income increased in 2020 as activity levels remained strong.
Noninterest Expense
The following table presents a comparative summary of the components of noninterest expense:
Year ended December 31, Change from
($ in thousands) 2020 2019 2018 2020 vs. 2019 2019 vs. 2018
Employee compensation and benefits $ 92,288 $ 81,295 $ 66,039 $ 10,993 $ 15,256
Occupancy 13,457 12,465 9,550 992 2,915
Data processing 9,050 8,242 6,321 808 1,921
Professional fees 3,940 3,683 3,134 257 549
Merger related expenses 4,174 17,969 1,271 (13,795) 16,698
Other expenses 44,250 41,831 32,716 2,419 9,115
Total noninterest expense $ 167,159 $ 165,485 $ 119,031 $ 1,674 $ 46,454
Efficiency ratio 51.51 % 57.48 % 51.70 % (5.97) % 5.78 %
Core efficiency ratio1
50.96 % 52.36 % 52.04 % (1.40) % 0.32 %
1 A non-GAAP measure. A reconciliation has been included in this MD&A section under the caption “Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures.”
Noninterest expense increased $1.7 million, or 1%, in 2020 compared to 2019. While total noninterest expense did not materially change from 2019, there were offsetting changes within the expense categories. The Company recorded $6.0 million of operating expenses from the acquisition of Seacoast, including $3.0 million in employee compensation and benefits and $2.2 million in other expenses from SBA lending and customer marketing and support services. Fiscal 2020 was also the first full year of Trinity operations. Employee compensation increased $11.0 million in 2020 compared to 2019, due to the previously mentioned increases from Seacoast and Trinity, annual merit and cost of living increases of approximately 3% of base salaries, and higher mortgage commissions commensurate with the increase in revenue. Merger related expenses of $4.2 million on the Seacoast acquisition were $13.8 million lower than the $18.0 million recorded in 2019 on the Trinity acquisition. In 2020, the majority of the Company's employees shifted to a virtual work environment. The Company did not experience a significant change in its operating expense from this development.
The Company expects to continue to invest in revenue producing associates and other infrastructure that supports additional growth.
Income Taxes
The Company’s blended federal and state tax rate is approximately 24.9%. Permanent differences between pre-tax income and taxable income along with tax planning initiatives reduced the effective income tax rate in 2020 to 19.1% compared to 20.1% in 2019. In addition, pursuant to the CARES Act, the Company was able to carryback a net operating loss to a prior period with a higher tax rate. This generated a tax benefit in 2020 of approximately $0.5 million.
FINANCIAL CONDITION
Summary Balance Sheet
($ in thousands) December 31, % Increase (Decrease)
2020 2019 2018 2020 vs. 2019 2019 vs. 2018
Total cash and cash equivalents $ 537,703 $ 167,256 $ 196,552 221.49 % (14.90) %
Securities 1,400,039 1,316,483 787,048 6.35 % 67.27 %
Total loans 7,224,935 5,314,337 4,350,001 35.95 % 22.17 %
Total assets 9,751,571 7,333,791 5,645,662 32.97 % 29.90 %
Deposits 7,985,389 5,771,023 4,587,985 38.37 % 25.79 %
Total liabilities 8,672,596 6,466,606 5,041,858 34.11 % 28.26 %
Total shareholders’ equity 1,078,975 867,185 603,804 24.42 % 43.62 %
Assets
Loans by Type
The Company has a diversified loan portfolio, with no particular concentration of credit in any one economic sector; however, a substantial portion of the portfolio, including the C&I category, is secured by $4.0 billion of real estate. The ability of the Company’s borrowers to honor their contractual obligations is partially dependent upon the local economy and its effect on the real estate market.
The following table sets forth the composition of the Company’s loan portfolio by type of loans at the dates indicated:
December 31,
($ in thousands) 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016
Commercial and industrial $ 3,088,995 $ 2,361,157 $ 2,123,167 $ 1,921,676 $ 1,636,238
Commercial real estate - investor owned 1,589,419 1,299,884 867,667 812,162 552,969
Commercial real estate - owner occupied 1,498,408 697,437 614,167 565,803 362,011
Construction and land development 546,686 457,273 334,645 308,974 198,907
Residential real estate 319,179 366,261 305,026 352,093 252,552
Other 182,248 132,325 105,329 136,342 155,484
Total loans $ 7,224,935 $ 5,314,337 $ 4,350,001 $ 4,097,050 $ 3,158,161
December 31,
2020 2019 2018 2017 2016
Commercial and industrial 42.8 % 44.4 % 48.8 % 46.9 % 51.8 %
Commercial real estate - investor owned 22.0 % 24.5 % 19.9 % 19.8 % 17.4 %
Commercial real estate - owner occupied 20.7 % 13.1 % 14.1 % 13.8 % 11.6 %
Construction and land development 7.6 % 8.6 % 7.7 % 7.5 % 6.3 %
Residential real estate 4.4 % 6.9 % 7.0 % 8.6 % 8.0 %
Other 2.5 % 2.5 % 2.5 % 3.4 % 4.9 %
Total loans 100.0 % 100.0 % 100.0 % 100.0 % 100.0 %
C&I loans are made based on the borrower’s ability to generate cash flows for repayment from income sources, general credit strength, experience, and character, even though such loans may also be secured by real estate or other assets. The credit risk related to commercial loans is largely influenced by general economic conditions and the resulting impact on a borrower’s operations.
The Company continues to focus on originating high-quality C&I relationships as they typically have variable interest rates and allow for cross selling opportunities involving other banking products. C&I loan growth also
supports our efforts to maintain the Company’s asset sensitive interest rate risk position. Additionally, our specialized products, especially sponsor finance, life insurance premium financing, and tax credit financing/lending, consist of primarily C&I loans, and have contributed significantly to the Company’s C&I loan growth. These loans are sourced through relationships developed with wealth and estate planning firms and private equity funds and are not bound geographically by our markets. As a result, these specialized loan products offer opportunities to expand and diversify our overall geographic concentration by entering into new markets. For the period ending December 31, 2020, C&I loans increased $727.8 million, or 31%, from 2019 primarily due to PPP loans.
Real estate loans place an emphasis on the estimated cash flows from the operation of the property and/or the underlying collateral value.
•Our commercial real estate loans, including investor-owned and owner-occupied categories, primarily represent multifamily and other commercial property loans on which the primary source of repayment is income from the property. These loans are principally underwritten based on the cash flow coverage of the property, the Company’s loan to value guidelines, and generally require either the limited or full guaranty of principal sponsors of the credit. Commercial real estate loans also represent owner-occupied C&I loans for which the primary source of repayment is dependent on sources other than the underlying collateral. For the period ending December 31, 2020, commercial real estate loans increased $1.1 billion, or 55%, from 2019 primarily due to the acquisition of Seacoast.
•Construction and land development loans relating primarily to residential and commercial properties, represent financing secured by real estate under development for eventual sale or undeveloped ground. At December 31, 2020, $164.4 million of these loans include the use of interest reserves and follow standard underwriting guidelines. Construction projects are monitored by the loan officer and a centralized independent loan disbursement function is employed.
•Residential real estate loans include residential mortgages, which are loans that, due to size or other attributes, do not qualify for conventional home mortgages available-for-sale in the secondary market, second mortgages and home equity lines. Residential mortgage loans are usually limited to a maximum of 80% of collateral value at origination.
Other loans represent loans to individuals, loans to state and political subdivisions, loans to nondepository financial institutions, and loans to purchase or are fully secured by investment securities. Credit risk is managed by thoroughly reviewing the creditworthiness of the borrowers prior to origination and thereafter.
The following table presents a breakdown of loans by NAICS code at December 31, 2020 and 2019:
December 31, 2020 December 31, 2019
($ in thousands) Outstanding Balance % Outstanding Balance %
Accomodation and Food Services $ 577,026 8 % $ 290,357 6 %
Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services 167,023 2 % 96,939 2 %
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting1
207,335 3 % 143,604 3 %
Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation 110,422 2 % 65,243 1 %
Construction 451,050 6 % 237,052 5 %
Educational Services 53,708 1 % 45,020 1 %
Finance and Insurance 1,057,888 15 % 863,908 16 %
Health Care and Social Assistance 320,556 4 % 207,257 4 %
Information 53,696 1 % 34,764 1 %
Management of Companies and Enterprises 54,563 1 % 47,499 1 %
Manufacturing 590,652 8 % 412,719 8 %
Mining, Quarrying, and Oil and Gas Extraction 3,375 - % 10,187 - %
Other Services (except Public Administration) 509,006 7 % 389,972 7 %
Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services 304,701 4 % 151,595 3 %
Public Administration 13,811 - % 14,932 - %
Real Estate and Rental and Leasing 1,722,630 24 % 1,534,109 29 %
Retail Trade 398,251 6 % 233,587 4 %
Transportation and Warehousing 151,273 2 % 110,142 2 %
Utilities 19,321 - % 13,398 - %
Wholesale Trade 360,630 5 % 341,025 6 %
Other 98,018 1 % 71,028 1 %
Total Loans $ 7,224,935 100 % $ 5,314,337 100 %
1Includes $109.0 million in animal production and $92.7 million in crop production at December 31, 2020.
The following table presents a breakdown of commercial & industrial loans by size at December 31, 2020.
($ in thousands) Number of Loans Outstanding Balance Average Balance
<$2 million 5,659 $ 1,020,870 $ 180
$2-5 million 277 858,287 3,099
$5-10 million 85 597,944 7,035
>$10 million 41 611,894 14,924
Total 6,062 $ 3,088,995 $ 510
The following table presents a breakdown of commercial real estate loans by size at December 31, 2020.
($ in thousands) Number of Loans Outstanding Balance Average Balance
<$2 million 2,775 $ 1,409,207 $ 508
$2-5 million 289 903,998 3,128
$5-10 million 70 454,430 6,492
>$10 million 23 320,192 13,921
Total 3,157 $ 3,087,827 $ 978
The following table presents a breakdown of construction loans by size at December 31, 2020.
($ in thousands) Number of Loans Outstanding Balance Average Balance
<$2 million 572 $ 163,327 $ 286
$2-5 million 39 125,446 3,217
$5-10 million 18 126,585 7,033
>$10 million 9 131,328 14,592
Total 638 $ 546,686 $ 857
The following table presents a breakdown of residential loans by size at December 31, 2020.
($ in thousands) Number of Loans Outstanding Balance Average Balance
<$2 million 2,764 $ 295,259 $ 107
$2-5 million 6 17,919 2,987
$5-10 million 1 6,001 6,001
Total 2,771 $ 319,179 $ 115
The following table presents a breakdown of other loans by size at December 31, 2020.
($ in thousands) Number of Loans Outstanding Balance Average Balance
<$2 million 2,008 $ 86,475 $ 43
$2-5 million 15 41,394 2,760
$5-10 million 5 32,468 6,494
>$10 million 2 21,911 10,955
Total 2,030 $ 182,248 $ 90
The following table presents a breakdown of total loans by geographic region at December 31, 2020:
($ in thousands) December 31, 2020
St. Louis $ 2,528,049
Kansas City 809,568
Arizona 419,738
New Mexico 617,496
California 264,080
Total $ 4,638,931
The table above excludes $698.6 million of PPP loans and $1.9 billion of specialty lending at December 31, 2020 and $1.0 billion of specialty lending at December 31, 2019.
The following table illustrates selected specialty lending detail, at December 31, 2020 and 2019:
December 31, Seacoast Acquired Loans
($ in thousands) 2020 2019 Change % Change at 12/31/20
C&I $ 1,103,060 $ 1,179,169 $ (76,109) (6.5) % $ 16,079
CRE investor owned 1,420,905 1,287,633 133,272 10.4 % 107,449
CRE owner occupied 825,846 713,563 112,283 15.7 % 98,134
SBA loans 895,930 19,249 876,681 4,554.4 % 874,578
SBA PPP loans 698,645 - 698,645 NM 85,729
Sponsor finance 396,487 428,896 (32,409) (7.6) % -
Life insurance premium financing 534,092 472,822 61,270 13.0 % -
Residential real estate 318,091 366,024 (47,933) (13.1) % 9,138
Construction and land development 474,399 428,681 45,718 10.7 % 32,535
Tax credits 382,602 294,210 88,392 30.0 % -
Other 174,878 124,090 50,788 40.9 % 764
Total Loans $ 7,224,935 $ 5,314,337 $ 1,910,598 36.0 % $ 1,224,406
Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified among the categories to conform to the current period presentation.
The sponsor finance portfolio is primarily comprised of loans in the manufacturing, and wholesale trade sectors. It includes mid-market company mergers and acquisitions, targeted private equity firms, principally SBICs, and senior debt financing to portfolio companies.
The life insurance premium financing category specializes in financing whole life insurance premiums utilized in high net worth estate planning, through relationships with boutique estate planners throughout the United States.
The tax credit portfolio includes tax credit-related lending on affordable housing projects funded through the use of
federal and state low income housing tax credits. In addition, we provide leveraged and other loans on projects funded through the U.S. Department of the Treasury Community Development Financial Institution (“CDFI”) New Markets Tax Credit Program. This portfolio also includes tax credit brokerage through 10-year streams of Missouri state tax credits from affordable housing development funds. The tax credits are sold to clients and other individuals for tax planning purposes.
SBA 7(a) loans are primarily owner-occupied, commercial real estate loans secured by a 1st lien. These loans predominantly have a 75% portion guaranteed by the SBA.
SBA PPP loans originated in 2020 in response to the COVID-19 pandemic and are guaranteed by the SBA. The loans may be forgivable by the SBA if certain requirements are met.
Significant loan concentrations are considered to exist for a financial institution when there are amounts loaned to numerous borrowers engaged in similar activities that would cause them to be similarly impacted by economic or other conditions. At December 31, 2020, no significant concentrations exceeding 10% of total loans existed in the Company’s loan portfolio, except as described above.
The following table presents the maturity distribution of loans at December 31, 2020 categorized by fixed or variable interest rates, net of unearned loan fees:
($ in thousands) Due in One
Year or Less After One Through Five Years After
Five Years Total Percent of
Total Loans
Fixed Rate Loans
Commercial and industrial $ 65,522 $ 964,958 $ 149,438 $ 1,179,918 16 %
Real estate:
Commercial 233,582 925,518 300,966 1,460,066 20 %
Construction and land development 56,428 137,447 4,718 198,593 3 %
Residential 24,523 57,068 42,283 123,874 2 %
Other 947 13,520 101,409 115,876 2 %
Total $ 381,002 $ 2,098,511 $ 598,814 $ 3,078,327 43 %
Variable Rate Loans
Commercial and industrial $ 1,827,245 $ 76,348 $ 5,484 $ 1,909,077 26 %
Real estate:
Commercial 1,379,525 238,107 10,129 1,627,761 23 %
Construction and land development 338,900 8,961 232 348,093 5 %
Residential 147,226 43,122 4,957 195,305 3 %
Other 61,416 4,956 - 66,372 1 %
Total $ 3,754,312 $ 371,494 $ 20,802 $ 4,146,608 58 %
Total Loans
Commercial and industrial $ 1,892,767 $ 1,041,306 $ 154,922 $ 3,088,995 43 %
Real estate:
Commercial 1,613,107 1,163,625 311,095 3,087,827 43 %
Construction and land development 395,328 146,408 4,950 546,686 8 %
Residential 171,749 100,190 47,240 319,179 4 %
Other 62,363 18,476 101,409 182,248 2 %
Total $ 4,135,314 $ 2,470,005 $ 619,616 $ 7,224,935 100 %
Fixed rate loans comprise 43% of the total loan portfolio at December 31, 2020, and 58% of the Company’s loans are variable-rate loans, most of which are based on the prime rate or LIBOR. Most loan originations have one-to three-year maturities. Management monitors this mix as part of its interest rate risk management. See “Interest Rate Risk” of this MD&A section.
Of the $1.6 billion of commercial real estate loans maturing in one year or less, $469 million, or 29%, represent loans secured by non-owner occupied commercial properties.
Provision and Allowance for Loan Losses
The adoption of CECL on January 1, 2020 increased the ACL on loans by $28.4 million, or 65%, and the allowance for unfunded commitments by $2.4 million. These increases were offset in retained earnings and did not impact the consolidated statement of operations. The following table summarizes changes in the ACL on loans arising from CECL adoption; additions to the allowance from acquired PCD loans, additions charged to expense, as well as loan charge-offs and recoveries by loan category.
December 31,
($ in thousands) 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016
Allowance, at beginning of period $ 43,288 $ 43,476 $ 42,577 $ 43,409 $ 43,616
CECL adoption 28,387 - - - -
PCD loans immediately charged-off (1,680) - - - -
Allowance, at beginning of period, adjusted for adoption of CECL $ 69,995 $ 43,476 $ 42,577 $ 43,409 $ 43,616
Initial allowance on acquired PCD loans 3,524 - - - -
Provision for credit losses 63,379 6,372 6,644 10,130 3,605
Charge-offs:
Commercial and industrial (5,381) (6,882) (6,894) (9,872) (2,303)
Real estate:
Commercial (528) (609) (313) (207) (95)
Construction and land development (31) (54) (56) (254) -
Residential (408) (667) (546) (973) (25)
Other (391) (382) (167) (201) (1,912)
Total charge-offs (6,739) (8,594) (7,976) (11,507) (4,335)
Recoveries:
Commercial and industrial 1,848 338 1,133 545 674
Real estate:
Commercial 3,197 114 112 235 1,165
Construction and land development 384 776 459 101 934
Residential 967 661 508 390 123
Other 116 295 80 73 12
Total recoveries 6,512 2,184 2,292 1,344 2,908
Net charge-offs (227) (6,410) (5,684) (10,163) (1,427)
Net charge-offs on PCI loans - (150) (61) (799) (2,385)
Allowance, at end of period $ 136,671 $ 43,288 $ 43,476 $ 42,577 $ 43,409
The following table presents the components of the provision for credit losses:
December 31,
(in thousands) 2020 2019
Provision for loan losses $ 54,822 $ 6,372
Day 2 provision on Seacoast acquired loans 8,557 -
Provision for off-balance sheet commitments 2,877 -
Provision for held-to-maturity securities 147 -
Recovery of accrued interest (1,005) -
Provision for credit losses $ 65,398 $ 6,372
The following table is a summary of the allocation of the allowance for loan losses for the five-year period ended December 31, 2020:
December 31,
2020 2019 2018 2017 2016
($ in thousands) Allowance Percent Allowance Percent Allowance Percent Allowance Percent Allowance Percent
Commercial and industrial $ 58,812 42.8 % $ 27,455 44.4 % $ 29,286 48.8 % $ 26,706 46.9 % $ 27,615 51.8 %
Real estate:
Commercial 49,074 42.7 % 10,808 37.6 % 8,924 34.1 % 8,553 33.6 % 8,220 29.0 %
Construction and land development 21,413 7.6 % 2,611 8.6 % 2,344 7.7 % 2,251 7.5 % 2,127 6.3 %
Residential 4,585 4.4 % 1,703 6.9 % 2,191 7.0 % 4,217 8.6 % 4,500 8.0 %
Other 2,787 2.5 % 711 2.5 % 731 2.4 % 850 3.4 % 947 4.9 %
Total allowance $ 136,671 100.0 % $ 43,288 100.0 % $ 43,476 100.0 % $ 42,577 100.0 % $ 43,409 100.0 %
The provision for credit losses, which includes a provision for losses on unfunded commitments, is a charge to earnings to maintain the ACL at a level consistent with management’s assessment of expected losses in the loan portfolio at the balance sheet date. The Company also records reversals of interest on nonaccrual loans and interest recoveries directly through the provision of credit losses. CECL requires economic forecasts to be factored into determining estimated losses. As a result, CECL will typically require a higher level of provision at the start of an economic downturn. The increase in the provision for credit losses in 2020 was primarily due to a change in economic forecasts from the end of 2019, which significantly deteriorated in March 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic and the resulting slow-down of business activity. Two of the primary economic loss drivers used in estimating the ACL include the percentage change in GDP and unemployment. At December 31, 2020, the Company’s forecast of the percentage change in GDP included a range of (2.5)% to 11.9% and the percentage change in unemployment included a range of 5.6% to 9.8%. The Company utilizes a one-year reasonable and supportable forecast and a one-year reversion period
As part of the acquisition of Seacoast, we recognized an allowance of $3.5 million on the PCD portfolio. In addition, we recognized $8.6 million on the non-PCD portion of the portfolio.
To the extent the Company does not recognize charge-offs and economic forecasts improve in future periods, the Company could recognize a reversal of provision for credit losses. Conversely, if economic conditions and the Company’s forecast worsens, the Company could recognize elevated levels of provision for credit losses. The provision is also reflective of charge-offs in the period.
The allowance for loan losses was 1.89% of total loans at December 31, 2020, compared to 0.81%, and 1.00%, at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. The increase in 2020 compared to 2019 was due to the adoption of CECL and higher provision expense due to the pandemic, partially offset by the acquisition of Seacoast and PPP loans which include $1.3 billion in government-guaranteed loans with no allowance.
See “Critical Accounting Policies” of this MD&A section for more information on the allowance for loan losses methodology.
Nonperforming assets
Prior to the adoption of CECL, PCI loans were accounted for in performing pools of loans and were not individually identified as nonaccrual or classified. Under the CECL accounting model, the Company did not elect to maintain PCI pools for certain loans which are now accounted for individually and are now included in nonperforming and classified loans. PCI loans are referred to as PCD under CECL.
See “Item 8. Note 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” for more policy information on impaired loans and other real estate.
The following table presents the categories of nonperforming assets, excluding government guaranteed portions, as of the dates indicated:
December 31,
($ in thousands) 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016
Non-accrual loans $ 34,818 $ 26,096 $ 16,520 $ 14,968 $ 12,585
Loans past due 90 days or more and still accruing interest 130 250 - - -
Restructured loans 3,559 79 225 719 2,320
Total nonperforming loans 38,507 26,425 16,745 15,687 14,905
Other real estate 5,330 6,344 469 498 980
Total nonperforming assets $ 43,837 $ 32,769 $ 17,214 $ 16,185 $ 15,885
Total assets $ 9,751,571 $ 7,333,791 $ 5,645,662 $ 5,289,225 $ 4,081,328
Total loans 7,224,935 5,314,337 4,350,001 4,097,050 3,158,161
Nonperforming loans to total loans 0.53 % 0.50 % 0.38 % 0.38 % 0.47 %
Nonperforming assets to total assets 0.45 % 0.45 % 0.30 % 0.31 % 0.39 %
Allowance for loan losses to nonperforming loans 355 % 164 % 260 % 271 % 291 %
Nonperforming loans
Nonperforming loans based on loan type were as follows:
($ in thousands) December 31, 2020 Number of loans December 31, 2019 Number of loans
Commercial and industrial $ 21,770 57 % 21 $ 22,578 85 % 14
Commercial real estate 12,519 32 % 27 2,516 10 % 7
Residential real estate 4,189 11 % 3 1,330 5 % 10
Other 29 - % 33 1 - % 1
Total $ 38,507 100 % 84 $ 26,425 100 % 32
The following table summarizes the changes in nonperforming loans:
Year ended December 31,
($ in thousands) 2020 2019
Nonperforming loans, beginning of period $ 26,425 $ 16,745
CECL adoption 8,462 -
PCD loans immediately charged off (1,680) -
Nonperforming loans, January 1 $ 33,207 $ 16,745
Additions to nonaccrual loans 25,849 32,214
Additions to restructured loans 3,750 -
Charge-offs (6,739) (8,173)
Principal reductions (16,303) (12,205)
Moved to other real estate (798) (1,732)
Moved to performing (361) (674)
Loans past due 90 days or more and still accruing interest (98) 250
Nonperforming loans, end of period $ 38,507 $ 26,425
Nonperforming loans at December 31, 2020 increased $12.1 million, or 46%, when compared to December 31, 2019. The increase in nonperforming loans during 2020 was primarily from a $9.1 million hotel loan. The Company has a specific reserve of $2.8 million for the potential collateral shortfall.
The Company has implemented several loan programs to assist its customers impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. These programs include consumer and business deferral programs and expanded small business lines of credit.
The following table presents loans modified as part of our COVID-19 deferral programs that remained in a deferral status:
($ in thousands) December 31, 2020
Commercial real estate $ 26,122
Commercial and industrial 15,708
Construction real estate 20,892
Residential real estate 255
Other -
Total loan modifications $ 62,977
Percentage of total loans 0.87 %
Loans in a deferral status at December 31, 2020 listed above include $30.3 million of loans receiving more than one deferral. The deferral modifications are primarily set to expire in the first quarter of 2021.
Potential problem loans
Potential problem loans are unimpaired loans with a risk rating of 8-Substandard still accruing interest. See “Item 8. Note 5 - Loans” for the definitions of risk ratings. Potential problem loans, which are not included in nonperforming loans, were $80 million, or 1.05%, of loans outstanding at December 31, 2020, compared to $56 million, or 1.20%, of loans outstanding at December 31, 2019. Potential problem loans at December 31, 2020 include the addition of $30.7 million of PCI loans previously accounted for in performing loan pools. For these loans, payment of principal and interest is current and the loans are performing; however, some doubts exist as to the borrower’s ability to continue to comply with repayment terms. Potential problem loans include loans to companies characterized by significant losses or where downward trends in financial performance have been identified, or are in an industry experiencing significant difficulty.
Other real estate
Other real estate at December 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019 was $5.3 million and $6.3 million, respectively.
At December 31, 2020, other real estate was comprised of four properties located in the St. Louis region and four properties in New Mexico consisting of a mix of commercial, land, and residential.
The following table summarizes the changes in other real estate:
Year ended December 31,
($ in thousands) 2020 2019
Other real estate, beginning of period $ 6,344 $ 469
Additions and expenses capitalized to prepare property for sale 756 8,148
Additions from acquisition - 3,225
Writedowns in value (1,104) (812)
Sales (666) (4,686)
Other real estate, end of period $ 5,330 $ 6,344
Writedowns in fair value were recorded in loan, legal, and other real estate expense.
Investments
At December 31, 2020, our portfolio of investment securities was $1.4 billion, or 14%, of total assets. The portfolio is comprised of both available-for-sale and held-to-maturity securities.
Other investments primarily consist of the FHLB capital stock, common stock investments related to our trust preferred securities, community development funds, and other investments in private equity funds, primarily SBICs.
The table below sets forth the carrying value of investment securities held by the Company at the dates indicated:
December 31,
2020 2019 2018
($ in thousands) Amount % Amount % Amount %
Obligations of U.S. Government sponsored enterprises $ 15,161 1.0 % $ 10,046 0.7 % $ 98,498 12.1 %
Obligations of states and political subdivisions 592,556 40.9 % 224,728 16.6 % 39,316 4.8 %
Agency mortgage-backed securities 639,314 44.1 % 948,367 70.0 % 639,309 78.6 %
U.S. Treasury Bills 11,466 0.8 % 10,226 0.8 % 9,925 1.2 %
Corporate debt securities 141,991 9.8 % 123,116 9.1 % - - %
Other investments: FHLB capital stock 10,774 0.8 % 15,673 1.2 % 9,158 1.1 %
Other investments 37,991 2.6 % 22,371 1.6 % 17,496 2.2 %
Total $ 1,449,253 100.0 % $ 1,354,527 100.0 % $ 813,702 100.0 %
The Company had no debt securities classified as trading at December 31, 2020, 2019, or 2018.
The following table summarizes expected maturity and tax-equivalent yield information on the investment portfolio at December 31, 2020:
Within 1 year 1 to 5 years 5 to 10 years Over 10 years No Stated Maturity Total
($ in thousands) Amount Yield Amount Yield Amount Yield Amount Yield Amount Yield Amount Yield
Obligations of U.S. Government-sponsored enterprises $ 10,164 2.12 % $ - - % $ 4,997 0.75 % $ - - % $ - - % $ 15,161 1.67 %
Obligations of states and political subdivisions 1,077 6.02 % 18,107 2.58 % 13,969 3.35 % 559,403 2.89 % - - % 592,556 2.90 %
Agency mortgage-backed securities 27,012 3.19 % 526,540 3.00 % 60,284 2.95 % 25,478 1.58 % - - % 639,314 2.94 %
U.S. Treasury Bills 1,000 0.11 % 10,466 2.47 % - - % - - % - - % 11,466 2.27 %
Corporate debt securities - - % 8,239 3.23 % 133,752 3.37 % - - % - - % 141,991 3.36 %
FHLB capital stock - - % - - % - - % - - % 10,774 4.23 % 10,774 4.23 %
Other investments - - % - - % - - % - - % 37,991 0.56 % 37,991 0.56 %
Total $ 39,253 2.91 % $ 563,352 2.98 % $ 213,002 3.19 % $ 584,881 2.83 % $ 48,765 1.37 % $ 1,449,253 2.89 %
Yields on tax-exempt securities are computed on a taxable equivalent basis using a tax rate of 24.7%. Expected maturities will differ from contractual maturities, as borrowers may have the right to call or repay obligations with or without prepayment penalties.
Deposits
The following table shows the breakdown of the Company’s deposits by type for the periods indicated:
Years ended December 31, % Increase (decrease)
($ in thousands) 2020 2019 2018 2020 vs. 2019 2019 vs. 2018
Noninterest-bearing deposit accounts $ 2,711,828 $ 1,327,348 $ 1,100,718 104.3 % 20.6 %
Interest-bearing transaction accounts 1,768,497 1,367,444 1,037,684 29.3 % 31.8 %
Money market accounts 2,327,066 1,713,615 1,565,729 35.8 % 9.4 %
Savings accounts 627,903 536,169 199,425 17.1 % 168.9 %
Total core deposits 7,435,294 4,944,576 3,903,556
Certificates of deposit:
Brokered 50,209 215,758 198,981 (76.7) % 8.4 %
Other 499,886 610,689 485,448 (18.1) % 25.8 %
Total deposits $7,985,389 $5,771,023 $4,587,985 38.4 % 25.8 %
Core deposits / Total deposits 93 % 86 % 85 %
Noninterest-bearing deposits / Total deposits 34 % 23 % 24 %
Core deposits, defined as total deposits excluding certificates of deposits, were $7.4 billion at December 31, 2020, an increase of $2.5 billion, or 50%, from December 31, 2019. The increase in 2020 was primarily due to the Seacoast acquisition and PPP loan fundings. Certificates of deposit, the highest cost portion of the deposit portfolio, declined $0.3 million in 2020.
The following table sets forth the maturities of certificates of deposit of $100,000 or more as of December 31, 2020:
($ in thousands) Total
Three months or less $ 84,724
Over three through six months 56,383
Over six through twelve months 118,337
Over twelve months 68,620
Total $ 328,064
Shareholders’ equity
Shareholders’ equity totaled $1.1 billion at December 31, 2020, an increase of $211.8 million, or 24%, from December 31, 2019.
Significant activity during the year ended December 31, 2020 included the following:
•increase from the issuance of approximately 5.0 million shares of common stock for the Seacoast acquisition reflecting approximately $167 million of consideration;
•increase from net income of $74.4 million;
•net increase in fair value of available-for-sale securities and cash flow hedges of $19.4 million;
•decrease from dividends paid on common stock of $19.8 million; and
•decrease from share repurchase of $15.3 million, pursuant to the Company’s publicly-announced stock repurchase program.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Liquidity
The objective of liquidity management is to ensure we have the ability to generate sufficient cash or cash equivalents in a timely and cost-effective manner to meet our commitments as they become due. Typical demands on liquidity are changes in deposit levels, maturing time deposits which are not renewed, and fundings under credit
commitments to customers. Funds are available from a number of sources, such as the core deposit base and loans and securities repayments and maturities.
Additionally, liquidity is provided from lines of credit with the FHLB, the Federal Reserve, and correspondent banks; the ability to acquire large and brokered deposits, sales of the securities portfolio, and the ability to sell loan participations to other banks. These alternatives are an important part of our liquidity plan and provide flexibility and efficient execution of the asset-liability management strategy.
The Company’s Asset-Liability Management Committee oversees our liquidity position, the parameters of which are approved by the Bank’s Board of Directors. Our liquidity position is monitored daily. Our liquidity management framework includes measurement of several key elements, such as the loan to deposit ratio, a liquidity ratio, and a dependency ratio. The Company’s liquidity framework also incorporates contingency planning to assess the nature and volatility of funding sources and to determine alternatives to these sources. While core deposits and loan and investment repayments are principal sources of liquidity, funding diversification is another key element of liquidity management and is achieved by strategically varying depositor types, terms, funding markets, and instruments.
Liquidity from asset categories is provided through cash and interest-bearing deposits with other banks, which totaled $537.7 million at December 31, 2020, compared to $167.3 million at December 31, 2019. The low interest rate environment, coupled with an uncertain outlook and government stimulus, such as the PPP, have increased liquidity for the banking industry, including the Company. Investment securities are another important tool to the Company’s liquidity objectives. Securities totaled $1.4 billion at December 31, 2020, and included $526 million pledged as collateral for deposits of public institutions, treasury, loan notes, and other requirements. The remaining $874 million could be pledged or sold to enhance liquidity, if necessary.
Liability liquidity funding sources are available to increase financial flexibility. In addition to amounts currently borrowed, at December 31, 2020, the Company could borrow an additional $739 million from the FHLB of Des Moines under blanket loan pledges and has an additional $921 million available from the Federal Reserve Bank under a pledged loan agreement. The Company also has unsecured federal funds lines with six correspondent banks totaling $90 million.
In the normal course of business, the Company enters into certain forms of off-balance sheet transactions, including unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit. These transactions are managed through the Company’s various risk management processes. Management considers both on-balance sheet and off-balance sheet transactions in its evaluation of the Company’s liquidity. The Company has $2 billion in unused commitments as of December 31, 2020. While this commitment level would exhaust the majority the Company’s current liquidity resources, the nature of these commitments is such that the likelihood of funding them in the aggregate at any one time is low.
At the holding company level, our primary funding sources are dividends and payments from the Bank and proceeds from the issuance of equity (i.e. stock option exercises, stock offerings) and debt instruments. The main use of this liquidity is to provide the funds necessary to pay dividends to shareholders, service debt, invest in subsidiaries as necessary, and satisfy other operating requirements. The holding company maintains a revolving line of credit for an aggregate amount up to $25 million, all of which is available at December 31, 2020. The line of credit has a one-year term and matures in February 2021 and is in the process for renewal. The proceeds can be used for general corporate purposes.
The Company has an effective automatic shelf registration statement on Form S-3 allowing for the issuance of various forms of equity and debt securities. The Company’s ability to offer securities pursuant to the registration statement depends on market conditions and the Company’s continuing eligibility to use the Form S-3 under rules of the SEC.
Strong capital ratios, credit quality and core earnings are essential to retaining cost-effective access to the wholesale funding markets. Deterioration in any of these factors could have a negative impact on the Company’s ability to
access these funding sources and, as a result, these factors are monitored on an ongoing basis as part of the liquidity management process. The Bank is subject to regulations and, among other things, may be limited in its ability to pay dividends or transfer funds to the parent company. Accordingly, consolidated cash flows as presented in the consolidated statements of cash flows may not represent cash immediately available for the payment of cash dividends to the Company’s shareholders or for other cash needs.
Capital Resources
The Company and the Bank are subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the federal banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory and possible additional discretionary actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on the financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, the Company and its bank affiliate must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance-sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. The banking affiliate’s capital amounts and classification are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings and other factors.
Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require the Company and the Bank to maintain minimum amounts and ratios (set forth in the following table) of total and tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets, and of tier 1 capital to average assets. To be categorized as “well-capitalized”, banks must maintain minimum total risk-based (10%), tier 1 risk-based (8%), common equity tier 1 risk-based (6.5%), and tier 1 leverage ratios (5%). As of December 31, 2020, and December 31, 2019, the Company and the Bank met all capital adequacy requirements to which they are subject.
The Bank met the definition of “well-capitalized” at each of December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018. Refer to “Item 8. Note 15 - Regulatory Matters” for a summary of our risk-based capital and leverage ratios.
The following table summarizes the Company’s various capital ratios at the dates indicated:
($ in thousands) December 31,
2020 2019 2018
Total capital to risk weighted assets 14.9 % 12.9 % 13.0 %
Tier 1 capital to risk weighted assets 12.1 % 11.4 % 11.1 %
Common equity tier 1 capital to risk weighted assets 10.9 % 9.9 % 9.8 %
Leverage ratio (Tier 1 capital to average assets) 10.0 % 10.1 % 10.3 %
Tangible common equity to tangible assets1
8.4 % 8.9 % 8.7 %
Total risk-based capital $ 1,094,601 $ 804,273 $ 650,859
Tier 1 capital 889,527 710,480 556,958
Common equity tier 1 capital 795,873 616,825 489,301
1 Not a required regulatory capital ratio
The following table summarizes the Bank’s various capital ratios at the dates indicated:
($ in thousands) December 31, Well-Capitalized
2020 2019 2018 Minimum %
Total capital to risk weighted assets 13.7 % 12.4 % 12.3 % 10.0%
Tier 1 capital to risk weighted assets 12.5 % 11.7 % 11.4 % 8.0%
Tier 1 common equity to risk weighted assets 12.5 % 11.7 % 11.4 % 6.5%
Leverage ratio (Tier 1 capital to average assets) 10.3 % 10.3 % 10.5 % 5.0%
Total risk-based capital $ 1,004,839 $ 769,254 $ 611,197
Tier 1 capital 913,169 725,461 567,296
Common equity tier 1 capital 913,116 725,406 567,239
The Company believes the tangible common equity and regulatory capital ratios are important measures of capital strength even though they are considered to be non-GAAP measures. The tables further within MD&A reconcile these ratios to U.S. GAAP.
Risk Management
Market risk arises from exposure to changes in interest rates and other relevant market rate or price risk. The Company faces market risk in the form of interest rate risk through transactions other than trading activities. Market risk from these activities, in the form of interest rate risk, is measured and managed through a number of methods. The Company uses financial modeling techniques to measure interest rate risk. These techniques measure the sensitivity of future earnings due to changing interest rate environments. Guidelines established by the Bank’s Asset/Liability Management Committee and approved by the Bank’s Board of Directors are used to monitor exposure of earnings at risk. General interest rate movements are used to develop sensitivity as management believes it has no primary exposure to a specific point on the yield curve. These limits are based on the Company’s exposure to immediate and sustained parallel rate movements, either upward or downward. The Company does not have any direct market risk from commodity exposures.
Interest Rate Risk
Our interest rate risk management practices are aimed at optimizing net interest income, while guarding against deterioration that could be caused by certain interest rate scenarios. Interest rate sensitivity varies with different types of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. We attempt to maintain interest-earning assets, comprised primarily of both loans and investments, and interest-bearing liabilities, comprised primarily of deposits, maturing or repricing in similar time horizons in order to manage any impact from market interest rate changes according to our risk tolerance. The Company uses an earnings simulation model to measure earnings sensitivity to changing rates.
The Company determines the sensitivity of its short-term future earnings to a hypothetical plus or minus 100 to 300 basis point parallel rate shock through the use of simulation modeling. The simulation of earnings includes the modeling of the balance sheet as an ongoing entity. Future business assumptions involving administered rate products, prepayments for future rate-sensitive balances, and the reinvestment of maturing assets and liabilities are included. These items are then modeled to project net interest income based on a hypothetical change in interest rates. The resulting net interest income for the next 12-month period is compared to the net interest income amount calculated using flat rates. This difference represents the Company’s earnings sensitivity to a positive or negative 100 basis points parallel rate shock.
The following table summarizes the projected impact of interest rate shocks on net interest income at December 31, 2020:
Rate Shock1
Annual % change
in net interest income
+ 300 bp 10.7%
+ 200 bp 6.2%
+ 100 bp 2.0%
1 Due to the current levels of interest rates, the downward shock scenarios are not shown.
In addition to the rate shocks shown in the table above, the Company models net interest income under various dynamic interest rate scenarios. In general, changes in interest rates are positively correlated with changes in net interest income.
The Company occasionally uses interest rate derivative instruments as an asset/liability management tool to hedge mismatches in interest rate exposure indicated by the net interest income simulation described above. They are used to modify the Company’s exposures to interest rate fluctuations and provide more stable spreads between loan yields and the rate on their funding sources. At December 31, 2020, the Company had $62.0 million in derivative
contracts used to manage interest rate risk. Derivative financial instruments are also discussed in “Item 8. Note 7 - Derivative Financial Instruments.”
The United Kingdom’s Financial Conduct Authority (“FCA”) announced in 2017 that market participants should not rely on LIBOR after 2021. LIBOR is the most liquid and common interest rate index in the world and is commonly referenced in financial instruments. While the Ice Benchmark Administration Ltd., who administers LIBOR, has said that it intends to continue to produce LIBOR after 2021, there can be no guarantee that it will continue without the FCA compelling or persuading LIBOR panel banks to submit quotes. The Federal Reserve’s Alternative Reference Rates Committee (“ARRC”) has proposed that the Secured Overnight Funding Rate (“SOFR”) replace LIBOR. However, at this time, the Company has not identified a replacement index for LIBOR.
We have exposure to LIBOR in various financial contracts. Instruments that may be impacted include loans, securities, debt instruments and derivatives, among other financial contracts indexed to LIBOR and that mature after December 31, 2021. We have an internal working group composed of members from legal, credit, finance, operations, risk and audit to monitor developments, develop policies and procedures, assess the impact to the Company, consider relevant options and to determine an appropriate replacement index for affected contracts that expire after the expected discontinuation of LIBOR on December 31, 2021. We are actively working to amend and address impacted contracts to allow for a replacement index. However, amending certain contracts indexed to LIBOR may require consent from the counterparties which could be difficult and costly to obtain in certain limited circumstances. As of December 31, 2020, the Company’s financial contracts indexed to LIBOR included $2.5 billion in loans, $239.2 million in deposits and borrowings, and $992.2 million (notional) in derivatives.
In addition, LIBOR is used in the Company’s analysis of the fair value of tax credits and may be referenced in other financial contracts not included in the discussion above.
The Company has $4.1 billion in variable rate loans as of December 31, 2020. Of these loans, $1.7 billion, or 37.0%, have a floor. $2.5 billion in variable rate loans are indexed to LIBOR, $1.3 billion are indexed to the prime rate, and $302 million are indexed to other rates.
Contractual Obligations, Off-Balance Sheet Risk, and Contingent Liabilities
Through the normal course of operations, the Company has entered into certain contractual obligations and other commitments. Such obligations relate to funding of operations through deposits or debt issuances, as well as leases for premises and equipment. As a financial services provider, the Company routinely enters into commitments to extend credit. While contractual obligations represent future cash requirements of the Company, a significant portion of commitments to extend credit may expire without being drawn upon. Such commitments are subject to the same credit policies and approval process accorded to loans made by the Company.
The recorded contractual obligations and other commitments, excluding any contractual interest,1 at December 31, 2020, were as follows:
Payments due by Period
($ in thousands) Total Less Than
1 Year Over 1 Year
Less than
3 Years Over 3 Years Less than
5 Years Over 5 Years
Operating leases $ 15,397 $ 4,353 $ 5,610 $ 3,168 $ 2,266
Certificates of deposit 550,095 384,563 113,208 46,744 5,580
Subordinated debentures and notes 209,750 - - - 209,750
FHLB advances 50,000 - - 50,000 -
Notes payable 30,000 7,143 11,428 11,429 -
(1) Interest charges on related contractual obligations were excluded from reported amounts as the potential cash outflows would have corresponding cash inflows from interest-earning assets.
The contractual commitments of off-balance sheet financial instruments at December 31, 2020, were as follows:
` Payments due by Period
($ in thousands) Total Less Than
1 Year Over 1 Year
Less than
3 Years Over 3 Years Less than
5 Years Over 5 Years
Commitments to extend credit $ 1,946,068 $ 1,351,213 $ 250,423 $ 132,077 $ 212,355
Letters of credit 50,971 46,181 4,665 125 -
State tax credits 24,473 12,886 11,587 - -
Limited partnership commitments 23,400 4,556 18,844 - -
See “Item 8. Note 18 - Commitments” for narrative disclosure regarding off-balance sheet arrangements.
As of December 31, 2020, we had liabilities associated with uncertain tax positions of $3.1 million. The table above does not include these liabilities due to the high degree of uncertainty regarding the future cash flows associated with these amounts.
The Company also enters into derivative contracts under which the Company either receives cash from or pays cash to counterparties depending on changes in interest rates. Derivative contracts are carried at fair value on the consolidated balance sheet with the fair value representing the net present value of expected future cash receipts or payments based on market interest rates as of the balance sheet date. The fair value of these contracts changes daily as market interest rates change.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The following accounting policies are considered most critical to the understanding of the Company’s financial condition and results of operations. These critical accounting policies require management’s most difficult, subjective and complex judgments about matters that are inherently uncertain. Because these estimates and judgments are based on current circumstances, they may change over time or prove to be inaccurate based on actual experience. In the event that different assumptions or conditions were to prevail, and depending upon the severity of such changes, the possibility of a materially different financial condition and/or results of operations could reasonably be expected. The impact and any associated risks related to our critical accounting policies on our business operations are discussed throughout “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” where such policies affect our reported and expected financial results. For a detailed discussion on the application of these and other accounting policies, see “Item 8. Note 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies.”
The Company has prepared all of the consolidated financial information in this report in accordance with GAAP. The Company makes estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Such estimates include the valuation of loans, goodwill, intangible assets, and other long-lived assets, along with assumptions used in the calculation of income taxes, among others. These estimates and assumptions are based on management’s best estimates and judgment. Management evaluates its estimates and assumptions on an ongoing basis using loss experience and other factors, including the current economic environment, which management believes to be reasonable under the circumstances. We adjust such estimates and assumptions when facts and circumstances dictate. Decreased real estate values, volatile credit markets, and persistent high unemployment have combined to increase the uncertainty inherent in such estimates and assumptions. As future events and their effects cannot be determined with precision, actual results could differ significantly from these estimates. Changes in estimates resulting from continuing changes in the economic environment will be reflected in the financial statement in future periods. There can be no assurances that actual results will not differ from those estimates.
Acquisitions
Acquisitions and Business Combinations are accounted for using the acquisition method of accounting. The assets and liabilities of the acquired entities have been recorded at their estimated fair values at the date of acquisition.
Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of net assets acquired, including the amount assigned to identifiable intangible assets.
The purchase price allocation process requires an estimation of the fair values of the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed. When a business combination agreement provides for an adjustment to the cost of the combination contingent on future events, the Company includes an estimate of the acquisition-date fair value as part of the cost of the combination. To determine the fair values, the Company relies on third party valuations, such as appraisals, or internal valuations based on discounted cash flow analyses or other valuation techniques. The results of operations of the acquired business are included in the Company’s consolidated financial statements from the respective date of acquisition. Merger-related costs are costs the Company incurs to effect a business combination. Merger-related expenses include costs directly related to merger or acquisition activity and include legal and professional fees, system consolidation and conversion costs, and compensation costs such as severance and retention incentives for employees impacted by acquisition activity. The Company accounts for merger-related costs as expenses in the periods in which the costs are incurred and the services are received.
Allowance for Credit Losses
On January 1, 2020, the Company adopted Accounting Standard Update 2016-13 “Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments.” This standard, referred to as CECL, requires an estimate of lifetime expected credit losses on certain financial assets measured at amortized cost.
The Company maintains separate allowances for funded loans, unfunded loans, and held-to-maturity securities, collectively the ACL. The ACL is a valuation account to adjust the cost basis to the amount expected to be collected, based on management’s estimate of experience, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts. For purposes of determining the allowance for funded and unfunded loans, the portfolios are segregated into pools that share similar risk characteristics that are then further segregated by credit grades. Loans that do not share similar risk characteristics are evaluated on an individual basis and are not included in the collective evaluation. The Company estimates the amount of the allowance based on historical loan loss experience, adjusted for current and forecasted economic conditions, including unemployment, changes in GDP, and commercial and residential real estate prices. The Company’s forecast of economic conditions uses internal and external information and considers a weighted average of a baseline, upside, and downside scenarios. Because economic conditions can change and are difficult to predict, the anticipated amount of estimated loan defaults and losses, and therefore the adequacy of the allowance, could change significantly and have a direct impact on the Company’s credit costs.
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
The Company completes a goodwill impairment test in the fourth quarter each year or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the Company may not be able to recover the goodwill or intangible assets respective carrying amounts. The impairment test involves the use of various estimates and assumptions. Management believes the estimates and assumptions utilized are reasonable. However, the Company may incur impairment charges related to goodwill or intangible assets in the future due to changes in business prospects or other matters that could impact estimates and assumptions.
Intangible assets other than goodwill, such as core deposit intangibles, that are determined to have finite lives are amortized over their estimated remaining useful lives. These assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If the carrying amount of an asset exceeds its estimated future cash flows, an impairment charge is recognized by the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds the fair value of the asset.
Impact of Inflation and Changing Prices
Our consolidated financial statements and related data presented in this Annual Report on Form 10-K have been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP, which requires the measurement of financial position and operating results in terms of historical dollar amounts (except with respect to securities classified as available-for-sale which are carried at market value) without considering the changes in the relative purchasing power of money over time due to inflation. Substantially all of our assets and liabilities are monetary in nature; as a result, interest rates have a greater impact on our performance than do the effects of general levels of inflation. Interest rates do not necessarily move in the same direction or to the same magnitude as the price of goods and services.
Effects of New Accounting Pronouncements
See “Item 8. Note 22 - New Authoritative Accounting Guidance” for information on recent accounting pronouncements and their impact, if any, on our consolidated financial statements.
Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures
The Company’s accounting and reporting policies conform to U.S. GAAP and the prevailing practices in the banking industry. However, the Company provides other financial measures, such as core efficiency ratio, tangible common equity ratio, return on average tangible common equity, and tangible book value per common share, in this filing that are considered “non-GAAP financial measures.” Generally, a non-GAAP financial measure is a numerical measure of a company’s financial performance, financial position, or cash flows that exclude (or include) amounts that are included in (or excluded from) the most directly comparable measure calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP.
The Company considers its core efficiency ratio, tangible common equity ratio, return on average tangible common equity, and tangible book value per common share, collectively “core performance measures” presented in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, as relevant measures of financial performance, even though they are non-GAAP measures, as they provide supplemental information by which to evaluate the impact of certain non-comparable items, and the Company’s operating performance on an ongoing basis. Core performance measures exclude certain other income and expense items such as merger-related expenses, facilities charges, and the gain or loss on sale of investment securities, the Company believes to be not indicative of or useful to measure the Company’s operating performance on an ongoing basis. The attached tables contain a reconciliation of these core performance measures to the GAAP measures. The Company believes that the tangible common equity ratio provides useful information to investors about the Company’s capital strength even though it is considered to be a non-GAAP financial measure and is not part of the regulatory capital requirements to which the Company is subject.
The Company believes the tangible common equity ratio provides useful information to investors about the Company’s capital strength, even though it is considered to be a non-GAAP financial measure, and is not part of the regulatory capital requirements to which the Company is subject.
The Company believes these non-GAAP measures and ratios, when taken together with the corresponding GAAP measures and ratios, provide meaningful supplemental information regarding the Company’s performance and capital strength. The Company’s management uses, and believes investors benefit from referring to, these non-GAAP measures and ratios in assessing the Company’s operating results and related trends and when forecasting future periods. However, these non-GAAP measures and ratios should be considered in addition to, and not as a substitute for or preferable to, ratios prepared in accordance with GAAP. The Company has provided a reconciliation of, where applicable, the most comparable GAAP financial measures and ratios to the non-GAAP financial measures and ratios, or a reconciliation of the non-GAAP calculation of the financial measure for the periods indicated.
Reconciliations of Non-GAAP Financial Measures
Core Efficiency Ratio
For the Years ended
($ in thousands) December 31, 2020 December 31, 2019 December 31, 2018
Net interest income $ 270,001 $ 238,717 $ 191,905
Less: Incremental accretion income 4,083 4,783 3,701
Core net interest income 265,918 233,934 188,204
Total noninterest income 54,503 49,176 38,347
Less: Other income from non-core acquired assets - 1,372 1,048
Less: Gain on sale of investment securities 421 243 9
Less: Other non-core income 265 266 675
Core noninterest income 53,817 47,295 36,615
Total core revenue $ 319,735 $ 281,229 $ 224,819
Total noninterest expense $ 167,159 $ 165,485 $ 119,031
Less: Merger related expenses 4,174 17,969 1,271
Less: Other expenses (credits) related to non-core acquired loans 57 257 (163)
Less: Facilities disposal charge - - 239
Less: Other non-core expenses - - 682
Core noninterest expense $ 162,928 $ 147,259 $ 117,002
Core efficiency ratio 50.96 % 52.36 % 52.04 %
Tangible Common Equity and Tangible Common Equity Ratio
For the Years ended December 31,
($ in thousands) 2020 2019 2018
Total shareholders' equity $ 1,078,975 $ 867,185 $ 603,804
Less: Goodwill 260,567 210,344 117,345
Less: Intangible assets 23,084 26,076 8,553
Tangible common equity $ 795,324 $ 630,765 $ 477,906
Total assets $ 9,751,571 $ 7,333,791 $ 5,645,662
Less: Goodwill 260,567 210,344 117,345
Less: Intangible assets 23,084 26,076 8,553
Tangible assets $ 9,467,920 $ 7,097,371 $ 5,519,764
Tangible common equity to tangible assets 8.40 % 8.89 % 8.66 %
Return on Average Tangible Common Equity
For the Years ended December 31,
($ in thousands) 2020 2019 2018
Average shareholder’s equity $ 902,875 $ 795,477 $ 576,960
Less average goodwill 217,205 193,804 117,345
Less average intangible assets 23,551 24,957 9,763
Average tangible common equity $ 662,119 $ 576,716 $ 449,852
Net Income $ 74,384 $ 92,739 $ 89,217
Return on average tangible common equity 11.23 % 16.08 % 19.83 %
Tangible Book Value Per Common Share
For the Years ended December 31,
($ in thousands) 2020 2019 2018
Tangible common equity (calculated above) $ 795,324 $ 630,765 $ 477,906
Period end shares outstanding 31,210 26,543 22,812
Tangible book value per common share $ 25.48 $ 23.76 $ 20.95

---

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
ITEM 7A: QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Please refer to “Risk Factors” included in Item 1A and “Risk Management” and “Interest Rate Risk” included in Management’s Discussion and Analysis under Item 7.

---

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
ITEM 8: FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
Enterprise Financial Services Corp and Subsidiaries
Page Number
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 59
Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2020 and 2019 64
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018 65
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018 66
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018 67
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018 68
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 70
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the shareholders and Board of Directors of Enterprise Financial Services Corp
Opinion on the Consolidated Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Enterprise Financial Services Corp and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income, shareholders’ equity, and cash flows, for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2020, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “financial statements”). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2020, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2020, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated February 19, 2021, expressed an unqualified opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
Change in Accounting Principle
As discussed in Note 1 to the financial statements, on January 1, 2020, the Company adopted ASU 2016-13 “Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments,” applicable to financial assets measured at amortized cost including loan receivables and held to maturity debt securities.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the US federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Critical Audit Matters
The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current-period audit of the financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.
Allowance for Credit Losses - Refer to Note 1 to the financial statements
Critical Audit Matter Description
The Company utilizes a discounted cash flow (“DCF”) method to measure the Allowance for Credit Losses (“ACL”) on loans collectively evaluated that are sub-segmented by credit risk levels. The DCF method incorporates assumptions for probability of default, loss given default, prepayments and curtailments over the contractual term of the loans. In determining the probability of default, the Company utilized a regression analysis to determine certain economic factors that are relevant loss drivers in the portfolio segments based on historical or peer evaluations such as unemployment or gross domestic product. Additionally, the Company applies qualitative adjustments to address risks not directly captured in the quantitative reserve; including to address macroeconomic uncertainty by weighting the forecasted baseline, upside, and downside economic factors.
We identified the allowance for credit losses as a critical audit matter because of the complexity of the Company’s model and the significant assumptions used by management. Auditing the allowance for credit losses required a high degree of auditor judgment and an increased extent of effort, including the need to involve credit specialists when performing audit procedures to evaluate the reasonableness of management’s models and assumptions.
How the Critical Audit Matter Was Addressed in the Audit
Our audit procedures related to the Company’s ACL included the following, among others:
a.We tested the design and operating effectiveness of management’s controls covering the key data, assumptions and judgments impacting the allowance for credit losses.
b.We evaluated the appropriateness of the Company’s accounting policies, methodologies, and elections involved in determining the allowance.
c.We involved credit specialists to assist us in evaluating the Company’s development of the CECL model, including the selection of and calibration to economic factors.
d.We assessed the reasonableness of the Company’s qualitative methodology, tested key calculations utilized within the qualitative estimate and agreed underlying data within the calculation to source documents.
Acquisition of Seacoast Commerce Banc Holdings (“Seacoast”) -Refer to Note 2 to the financial statements
Critical Audit Matter Description
On November 12, 2020, the Company closed its acquisition of 100% of Seacoast and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Seacoast Commerce Bank. The value of the transaction consideration was approximately $169 million. The acquisition of Seacoast has been accounted for as a business combination using the acquisition method of accounting which requires assets acquired and liabilities assumed to be recognized at fair value as of the acquisition date. Goodwill of $50 million arising from the acquisition consists largely of the synergies and economies of scale expected from combining the operations of Seacoast into the Company.
Given that the fair value determination of net assets, specifically the credit assumptions related to the acquired loan balance, required management to make significant estimates and assumptions related to the associated credit risk, performing audit procedures to evaluate the reasonableness of these estimates and assumptions required a high degree of auditor judgment and an increased extent of effort, including the need to involve our fair value specialists.
How the Critical Audit Matter Was Addressed in the Audit
Our audit procedures related to management’s determination of the credit risk associated with these loans included the following, among others:
a.We tested the design and operating effectiveness of controls over the valuation of the acquired loans, including management’s controls over the determination of credit risk.
b.With the assistance of our fair value specialists, we evaluated the reasonableness of the (1) the discounted cash flow valuation methodology and (2) credit risk assumption utilized in the calculations by:
i.Testing the source information underlying the determination of the credit risk assumptions and testing the mathematical accuracy of the calculation.
ii.Developing independent estimates and comparing those to the credit risk assumptions selected by management.
/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
St. Louis, Missouri
February 19, 2021
We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2010.
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the shareholders and Board of Directors of Enterprise Financial Services Corp
Opinion on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of Enterprise Financial Services Corp and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2020, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2020, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by COSO.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2020, of the Company and our report dated February 19, 2021, expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements and included an explanatory paragraph regarding the Company’s adoption of accounting standard update (ASU) 2016-13 “Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments”.
As described in Management’s Assessment on Internal Control over Financial Reporting, management excluded from its assessment the internal control over financial reporting at Seacoast Commerce Banc Holdings (“SCBH”), which was acquired on November 12, 2020, and whose financial statements constitute 14% of total assets and 3% of net interest income of the consolidated financial statement amounts as of and for the year ended December 31, 2020. Accordingly, our audit did not include the internal control over financial reporting at SCBH.
Basis for Opinion
The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Assessment on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
St. Louis, Missouri
February 19, 2021
ENTERPRISE FINANCIAL SERVICES CORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Balance Sheets
As of December 31, 2020 and 2019
($ in thousands, except per share data) December 31, 2020 December 31, 2019
Assets
Cash and due from banks $ 99,760 $ 74,769
Federal funds sold 1,519 3,060
Interest-earning deposits (including $36,525 and $15,285 pledged as collateral, respectively) 436,424 89,427
Total cash and cash equivalents 537,703 167,256
Interest-earning deposits greater than 90 days 7,626 3,730
Securities available-for-sale 912,429 1,135,317
Securities held-to-maturity 487,610 181,166
Loans held-for-sale 13,564 5,570
Loans 7,224,935 5,314,337
Less: Allowance for credit losses on loans 136,671 43,288
Total loans, net 7,088,264 5,271,049
Other investments 48,764 38,044
Fixed assets, net 53,169 60,013
Goodwill 260,567 210,344
Intangible assets, net 23,084 26,076
Other assets 318,791 235,226
Total assets $ 9,751,571 $ 7,333,791
Liabilities and Shareholders' equity
Noninterest-bearing deposit accounts $ 2,711,828 $ 1,327,348
Interest-bearing transaction accounts 1,768,497 1,367,444
Money market accounts 2,327,066 1,713,615
Savings accounts 627,903 536,169
Certificates of deposit:
Brokered 50,209 215,758
Other 499,886 610,689
Total deposits 7,985,389 5,771,023
Subordinated debentures and notes 203,637 141,258
FHLB advances 50,000 222,406
Other borrowings 271,081 230,886
Notes payable 30,000 34,286
Other liabilities 132,489 66,747
Total liabilities 8,672,596 6,466,606
Commitments and contingent liabilities (Note 18)
Shareholders' equity:
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value;
5,000,000 shares authorized; 0 shares issued and outstanding - -
Common stock, $0.01 par value; 45,000,000 shares authorized; 33,190,306 and 28,067,087 shares issued, respectively 332 281
Treasury stock, at cost; 1,980,093 and 1,523,842 shares, respectively (73,528) (58,181)
Additional paid in capital 697,839 526,599
Retained earnings 417,212 380,737
Accumulated other comprehensive income 37,120 17,749
Total shareholders' equity 1,078,975 867,185
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity $ 9,751,571 $ 7,333,791
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
ENTERPRISE FINANCIAL SERVICES CORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Operations
Years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018
Year ended December 31,
($ in thousands, except per share data) 2020 2019 2018
Interest income:
Interest and fees on loans $ 270,238 $ 269,406 $ 217,212
Interest on debt securities:
Taxable 24,629 29,030 17,469
Nontaxable 8,397 3,515 1,074
Interest on interest-earning deposits 620 2,128 1,141
Dividends on equity securities 895 1,055 906
Total interest income 304,779 305,134 237,802
Interest expense:
Deposits 21,049 49,856 33,769
Subordinated debentures and notes 9,885 7,507 5,798
FHLB advances 2,673 6,668 5,556
Notes payable and other borrowings 1,171 2,386 774
Total interest expense 34,778 66,417 45,897
Net interest income 270,001 238,717 191,905
Provision for credit losses 65,398 6,372 6,644
Net interest income after provision for credit losses 204,603 232,345 185,261
Noninterest income:
Service charges on deposit accounts 11,717 12,801 11,749
Wealth management revenue 9,732 9,932 8,241
Card services revenue 9,481 9,154 6,686
Tax credit income 6,611 5,393 2,820
Miscellaneous income 16,962 11,896 8,851
Total noninterest income 54,503 49,176 38,347
Noninterest expense:
Employee compensation and benefits 92,288 81,295 66,039
Occupancy 13,457 12,465 9,550
Data processing 9,050 8,242 6,321
Professional fees 3,940 3,683 3,134
Merger-related expenses 4,174 17,969 1,271
Other 44,250 41,831 32,716
Total noninterest expense 167,159 165,485 119,031
Income before income tax expense 91,947 116,036 104,577
Income tax expense 17,563 23,297 15,360
Net income $ 74,384 $ 92,739 $ 89,217
Earnings per common share
Basic $ 2.76 $ 3.56 $ 3.86
Diluted 2.76 3.55 3.83
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
ENTERPRISE FINANCIAL SERVICES CORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
Years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018
Year ended December 31,
($ in thousands) 2020 2019 2018
Net income $ 74,384 $ 92,739 $ 89,217
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:
Change in unrealized gain (loss) on available-for-sale debt securities 23,944 29,189 (4,626)
Reclassification adjustment for realized (gain) loss on the sale of available-for-sale debt securities (317) 37 (7)
Reclassification of (gain) loss on held-to-maturity securities (1,910) (33) 3
Change in unrealized loss on cash flow hedges arising during the period (5,947) (2,262) -
Reclassification of loss on cash flow hedges 3,601 100 -
Other comprehensive income (loss), net 19,371 27,031 (4,630)
Total comprehensive income $ 93,755 $ 119,770 $ 84,587
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
ENTERPRISE FINANCIAL SERVICES CORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity
Years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018
($ in thousands, except per share data) Common Stock Treasury Stock Additional paid in capital Retained earnings Accumulated
other
comprehensive income (loss) Total
shareholders’ equity
Balance December 31, 2017 $ 238 $ (23,268) $ 350,061 $ 225,360 $ (3,818) $ 548,573
Net income $ - $ - $ - $ 89,217 $ - $ 89,217
Other comprehensive loss, net - - - - (4,630) (4,630)
Cash dividends paid on common shares, $0.47 per share - - - (10,845) - (10,845)
Repurchase of common shares, 435,435 shares - (19,387) - - - (19,387)
Issuance under equity compensation plans, 157,882 shares, net 1 - (2,577) - - (2,576)
Share-based compensation - - 3,452 - - 3,452
Reclassification adjustments for change in accounting policies - - - 834 (834) -
Balance December 31, 2018 $ 239 $ (42,655) $ 350,936 $ 304,566 $ (9,282) $ 603,804
Net income $ - $ - $ - $ 92,739 $ - $ 92,739
Other comprehensive income, net - - - - 27,031 27,031
Cash dividends paid on common shares, $0.62 per share - - - (16,568) - (16,568)
Repurchase of common shares, 396,737 shares - (15,526) - - - (15,526)
Issuance under equity compensation plans, 137,271 shares, net 2 - (214) - - (212)
Shares issued in connection with acquisition of Trinity Capital Corporation, 3,990,822 shares 40 - 171,845 - - 171,885
Share-based compensation - - 4,032 - - 4,032
Balance December 31, 2019 $ 281 $ (58,181) $ 526,599 $ 380,737 $ 17,749 $ 867,185
Net income $ - $ - $ - $ 74,384 $ - $ 74,384
Other comprehensive income, net - - - - 19,371 19,371
Cash dividends paid on common shares, $0.72 per share - - - (19,795) - (19,795)
Repurchase of common shares - (15,347) - - - (15,347)
Issuance under equity compensation plans, 146,005 shares, net 1 - 77 - - 78
Shares issued in connection with acquisition of Seacoast Commerce Banc Holdings, 4,977,214 shares 50 - 166,985 - - 167,035
Share-based compensation - - 4,178 - - 4,178
Reclassification for the adoption of ASU 2016-13 (CECL) - - - (18,114) - (18,114)
Balance December 31, 2020 $ 332 $ (73,528) $ 697,839 $ 417,212 $ 37,120 $ 1,078,975
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
ENTERPRISE FINANCIAL SERVICES CORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018
Year ended December 31,
($ in thousands) 2020 2019 2018
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income $ 74,384 $ 92,739 $ 89,217
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation 6,152 5,719 3,532
Provision for credit losses 65,398 6,372 6,644
Deferred income taxes (12,578) 5,800 3,307
Net amortization of debt securities 6,745 2,973 1,691
Amortization of intangible assets 5,673 5,543 2,503
Gain on sale of investment securities
Mortgage loans originated-for-sale (223,094) (81,941) (36,229)
Proceeds from mortgage loans sold 217,934 77,302 39,310
Loss (gain) on:
Sale of investment securities (421) 49 (9)
Sale of other real estate 13 (113) (13)
Sale of state tax credits (2,016) (2,549) (2,820)
Share-based compensation 4,178 4,032 3,452
Net accretion of loan discount (7,767) (10,494) (1,700)
Changes in other assets and liabilities, net 913 (12,975) (77)
Net cash provided by operating activities 135,514 92,457 108,808
Cash flows from investing activities:
Acquisition cash purchase price, net of cash and cash equivalents acquired 62,114 (23,377) -
Net increase in loans (700,096) (284,235) (257,872)
Proceeds received from:
Sale of debt securities, available-for-sale 20,221 357,976 1,451
Paydown or maturity of debt securities, available-for-sale 329,350 146,132 84,189
Paydown or maturity of debt securities, held-to-maturity 41,377 7,447 6,397
Redemption of other investments 43,555 61,917 50,274
Sale of state tax credits held-for-sale 14,252 14,689 14,718
Sale of other real estate 652 4,798 875
Settlement of bank-owned life insurance policies 1,993 - 1,256
Payments for the purchase of:
Available for sale debt securities (452,541) (577,211) (172,026)
Other investments (50,421) (68,963) (51,828)
State tax credits held-for-sale (11,026) (11,356) (6,017)
Fixed assets (2,259) (6,337) (3,035)
Net cash used in investing activities (702,829) (378,520) (331,618)
Year ended December 31,
($ in thousands) 2020 2019 2018
Cash flows from financing activities:
Net increase (decrease) in noninterest-bearing deposit accounts 627,756 57,551 (23,189)
Net increase in interest-bearing deposit accounts 505,604 44,300 454,760
Proceeds from the issuance of subordinated notes 61,953 - -
Proceeds (repayments) from short-term FHLB advances, net (172,300) 95,500 (102,500)
Proceeds from long-term FHLB advances - 50,000 -
Repayment of PPPLF advances (86,096) - -
Proceeds from notes payable - 41,000 2,000
Repayments of notes payable (4,286) (8,714) -
Net increase (decrease) in other borrowings 40,195 9,436 (32,224)
Cash dividends paid on common stock (19,795) (16,568) (10,845)
Repurchase of common stock (15,347) (15,526) (19,387)
Payments for the issuance of equity instruments, net 78 (212) (2,576)
Net cash provided by financing activities 937,762 256,767 266,039
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents 370,447 (29,296) 43,229
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period 167,256 196,552 153,323
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period $ 537,703 $ 167,256 $ 196,552
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
Cash paid during the period for:
Interest $ 35,423 $ 65,667 $ 45,650
Income taxes 7,514 13,582 10,136
Noncash transactions:
Transfer to other real estate owned in settlement of loans $ 798 $ 8,148 $ 876
Sales of other real estate financed 48 621 -
Transfer of securities from available-for-sale to held-to-maturity 352,665 116,303 -
Transfer to loans from fixed assets for deconsolidation of partnership 3,336 - -
Right-of-use assets obtained in exchange for lease obligations 1,623 5,208 -
Common shares issued in connection with acquisitions 167,035 171,885 -
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
ENTERPRISE FINANCIAL SERVICES CORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
NOTE 1 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The significant accounting policies used by the Company in the preparation of the consolidated financial statements are summarized below.
Business and Consolidation
Enterprise is a financial holding company that provides a full range of banking and wealth management services to individuals and corporate customers primarily located in the Arizona, California, Kansas, Missouri, Nevada, and New Mexico markets through its banking subsidiary, Enterprise Bank & Trust. All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.
The Company and its banking subsidiary are subject to the regulations of certain federal and state agencies and undergo periodic examinations by those regulatory agencies. The Company has one operating segment.
Use of Estimates
The consolidated financial statements of the Company have been prepared in conformity with GAAP. In preparing the consolidated financial statements, management is required to make estimates and assumptions, which significantly affect the reported amounts in the consolidated financial statements. Such estimates include the valuation of loans, goodwill, intangible assets, and other long-lived assets, along with assumptions used in the calculation of income taxes, among others. These estimates and assumptions are based on management’s best estimates and judgment. Management evaluates its estimates and assumptions on an ongoing basis using experience and other factors, including the current economic environment, which management believes to be reasonable under the circumstances. Management adjusts such estimates and assumptions when facts and circumstances dictate. As future events and their effects cannot be determined with precision, actual results could differ significantly from these estimates. Changes in those estimates resulting from continuing changes in the economic environment will be reflected in the financial statements in future periods.
Cash Flow Information
For purposes of reporting cash flows, the Company considers cash and due from banks, interest-bearing deposits and federal funds sold that mature within 90 days of the balance sheet date to be cash and cash equivalents. At December 31, 2019, approximately $9.7 million of cash and due from banks represented required reserves on deposits maintained by the Company in accordance with Federal Reserve requirements. There were no required reserves on December 31, 2020.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
On January 1, 2020, the Company adopted ASU 2016-13 “Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments,” (ASU 2016-13) which replaces the incurred loss methodology with an expected loss methodology commonly referred to as the CECL methodology. The measurement of expected credit losses under the CECL methodology is applicable to financial assets measured at amortized cost, including loan receivables and held-to-maturity debt securities. It also applies to off-balance sheet credit exposures such as loan commitments, standby letters of credit, financial guarantees, and other similar instruments. In addition, this standard made changes to the accounting for available-for-sale debt securities, including the requirement for credit losses to be presented as an allowance rather than as a write-down on available-for-sale debt securities.
The Company adopted this standard using the modified retrospective method for all financial assets measured at amortized cost, and off-balance-sheet credit exposures. Results for reporting periods beginning after January 1, 2020 are presented under the new standard while prior period amounts continue to be reported in accordance with
previously applicable GAAP. The Company recorded an after-tax decrease to retained earnings of $18.1 million as of January 1, 2020 for the cumulative effect of adopting this standard.
The Company adopted this standard using the prospective transition approach for PCD assets that were previously classified as PCI assets. Management did not reassess whether PCI assets met the criteria of PCD assets as of the date of the adoption.
The Company elected not to maintain PCI pools for certain loans which are now accounted for individually. Thus they are now included in nonperforming and classified loans. Management did not reassess whether modifications to individual acquired financial assets accounted for in pools were troubled debt restructurings as of the date of adoption.
The following table illustrates the impact of adoption:
($ in thousands) December 31, 2019 Impact of Adoption January 1, 2020
Assets:
Loans $ 5,314,337 $ 7,091 $ 5,321,428
Allowance for credit losses on loans 43,288 28,387 71,675
Allowance for credit losses on held-to-maturity debt securities - 303 303
Deferred tax asset 14,851 5,898 20,749
Liabilities:
Reserve for unfunded commitments 430 2,413 2,843
Shareholders’ Equity
Retained Earnings 380,737 (18,114) 362,623
On January 1, 2020, the Company adopted ASU 2018-13, “Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Disclosure Framework-Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement”. The Company previously selected the option to adopt the removal or modification of disclosures during the second quarter of 2019. The amendments on changes in unrealized gains and losses, the range and weighted average of significant unobservable inputs used to develop Level 3 fair value measurements, and the narrative description of measurement uncertainty are applied prospectively for only the most recent interim or annual period presented. All other amendments are applied retrospectively to all periods presented upon their effective date. The adoption of this update did not have a material effect on the Company's consolidated financial statements.
On January 1, 2020, the Company adopted ASU 2017-04, Intangibles - Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment, (ASU 2017-04). ASU 2017-04 simplifies the quantitative measurement of goodwill by eliminating Step 2 from the goodwill impairment test which required entities to compute the implied fair value of goodwill. Under ASU 2017-04, an entity should perform its annual, or interim, goodwill impairment test by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount, and then recognizing an impairment charge for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value; however, the loss recognized should not exceed the total amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit. The adoption of this update did not have a material effect on the Company's consolidated financial statements.
ASU 2021-01, Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848): Scope (ASU 2021-01). ASU 2021-01 was issued in January 2021 and provided optional expedients and exceptions in ASC 848 to contracts, hedging relationships, and other transactions affected by reference rate reform if certain criteria are met. The amendment only applies to contracts, hedging relationships, and other transactions that reference LIBOR or another reference rate expected to be discontinued because of reference rate reform. The expedients and exceptions provided by the amendments do
not apply to contract modifications made and hedging relationships entered into or evaluated after December 31, 2022, except for hedging relationships existing as of December 31, 2022, that an entity has elected certain optional expedients for and that are retained through the end of the hedging relationship. The amendments in this update were effective immediately upon issuance and did not have a material effect on the Company's consolidated financial statements.
Investments
The Company has classified all investments in debt securities as available-for-sale or held-to-maturity.
Securities classified as available-for-sale are carried at fair value. Unrealized holding gains and losses for available-for-sale securities are excluded from earnings and reported as a net amount in a separate component of shareholders’ equity until realized. All previous fair value adjustments included in the separate component of shareholders’ equity are reversed upon sale.
Securities classified as held-to-maturity are carried at amortized cost and adjusted for amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts.
Prior to the adoption of ASU 2016-13 on January 1, 2020, declines in the fair value of securities below their cost deemed to be other-than-temporary were reflected in operations as realized losses. In estimating other-than-temporary impairment losses, management evaluated investment securities for other-than-temporary declines in fair value on a quarterly basis. This analysis required management to consider various factors, which included (1) the present value of the cash flows expected to be collected compared to the amortized cost of the security, (2) duration and magnitude of the decline in value, (3) the financial condition of the issuer or issuers, (4) structure of the security, and (5) the intent to sell the security or whether it’s more likely than not the Company would be required to sell the security before its anticipated recovery in market value.
An ACL on held-to-maturity securities is deducted from the amortized cost basis of the securities to reflect the expected amount to be collected. When it is determined that a security will not be collected, the balance is written-off through the allowance. In evaluating the need for an ACL, securities with similar risk characteristics are grouped and an estimate of expected cash flows is determined using historical loss experience, adjusted for current and reasonable and supportable forecasts of economic conditions.
For available-for-sale securities in a loss position, the Company evaluates whether the decline in fair value below amortized cost resulted from a credit loss or other factors. Losses attributed to credit are recognized through an ACL on available-for-sale securities, limited to the amount that the fair value of securities is less than the amortized cost basis. In assessing credit loss, the Company considers, among other things, (1) the extent to which fair value is less than the amortized cost basis, (2) adverse conditions specific to the security or industry, (3) historical payment patterns, (4) the likelihood of future payments, and (5) changes to the rating of a security by a rating agency.
The Company has elected to exclude accrued interest receivable balances from the estimate of the ACL as these amounts are timely written off as a credit loss expense. Adjustments to the ACL on held-to-maturity and available-for-sale securities are recognized as a component of the provision for credit losses in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Premiums and discounts are amortized or accreted over the expected lives of the respective securities as an adjustment to yield using the interest method. Dividend and interest income is recognized when earned. Realized gains and losses are included in earnings and are derived using the specific identification method for determining the cost of securities sold.
Loans Held-for-Sale and Servicing Assets
The Company provides long-term financing of one-to-four-family residential real estate by originating fixed and variable rate loans. Long-term fixed and variable rate loans are usually sold into the secondary market with limited recourse. Upon receipt of an application for a real estate loan, the Company determines whether the loan will be sold into the secondary market or retained in the Company’s loan portfolio. The interest rates on the loans sold are
locked with the buyer and the Company bears no interest rate risk related to these loans. Mortgage loans held-for-sale are carried at the lower of cost or fair value, which is determined on a specific identification method. The Company does not retain servicing on these loans.
The Company also originates SBA7(a) loans that generally provides for a guarantee of 75% up to a maximum amount. The guaranteed portion of the loan can be sold in an active secondary market. For the year ended December 31, 2020, all SBA7(a) loans are considered held-for-investment; however, as the Company makes the determination to sell the loans, they will be moved into the held-for-sale category. Sales of SBA guaranteed loans are executed on a servicing retained basis, and the Company retains the rights and obligations to service the loans. At December 31, 2020, the Company was servicing $296 million in SBA loans and has recorded a related servicing asset of $5.7 million. The servicing asset is accounted for under the amortization method and is evaluated for impairment. Amortization of the servicing asset is recorded as a reduction to servicing income.
Gains on the sale of loans held-for-sale are reported net of direct origination fees and costs in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Loans
Loans are reported at the principal balance outstanding, net of unearned fees, costs, and premiums or discounts on acquired loans. Loan origination fees, direct origination costs, and premiums or discounts resulting from acquired loans are deferred and recognized over the lives of the related loans as a yield adjustment using the interest method.
Interest on loans is accrued to income based on the principal balance outstanding. The recognition of interest income is discontinued when a loan becomes 90 days past due or a significant deterioration in the borrower’s credit has occurred which, in management’s judgment, negatively impacts the collectibility of the loan. Unpaid interest on such loans is reversed at the time the loan becomes uncollectible and subsequent interest payments received are generally applied to principal if any doubt exists as to the collectibility of such principal. Loans that have not been restructured are returned to accrual status when management believes full collectibility of principal and interest is expected. Non-accrual loans that have been restructured will remain in a non-accrual status until the borrower has made at least six months of consecutive contractual payments.
The Company has elected to present the accrued interest receivable balance separate from amortized cost basis, to exclude accrued interest receivable balances from the tabular disclosures, and not to estimate an ACL on accrued interest receivable as these amounts are timely written off as a credit loss expense.
Accrued interest receivable totaled $31.1 million at December 31, 2020 and was reported in Other Assets on the consolidated balance sheets.
Acquired Loans
Prior to the adoption of ASU 2016-13 on January 1, 2020, PCI loans were acquired in a business combination or transaction, had evidence of deterioration of credit quality since origination and for which it was probable, at acquisition, that the Company would be unable to collect all contractually required payments receivable. PCI loans were initially recorded at fair value (as determined by the present value of expected future cash flows) with no valuation allowance. The difference between the undiscounted cash flows expected at acquisition and the investment in the loans, or the “accretable yield,” was recognized as interest income on a level-yield method over the life of the loans. Contractually required payments for interest and principal that exceeded the undiscounted cash flows expected at acquisition, or the “nonaccretable difference,” were not recognized as a yield adjustment or as a loss accrual or a valuation allowance. The Company aggregated individual loans with common risk characteristics into pools of loans. Increases in expected cash flows subsequent to the initial investment were recognized prospectively through adjustment of the yield on the loans over their remaining lives. Decreases in expected cash flows due to an inability to collect contractual cash flows were recognized as impairment through the provision for loan losses account. Any allowance for loan loss on these pools reflected only losses incurred after the acquisition. Disposals of loans, including sales of loans, paydowns, payments in full or foreclosures resulted in the removal or reduction of the loan from the loan pool.
Subsequent to the adoption of ASU 2016-16, acquired loans are separated into two categories based on the credit risk characteristics of the underlying borrowers as either purchased credit deteriorated (PCD), for loans which have experienced more than insignificant credit deterioration since origination, or loans with no credit deterioration (non-PCD). At the date of acquisition, an ACL on PCD loans is determined and added to the amortized cost basis of the individual loans. The difference between the initial amortized cost basis and the par value of the loan is a noncredit discount or premium, which is amortized into interest income over the life of the loan. The ACL on PCD loans is recorded in the acquisition accounting and no provision for credit losses is recognized at the acquisition date. Subsequent changes to the ACL are recorded through provision expense. For non-PCD loans, an ACL is established immediately after the acquisition through a charge to the provision for credit losses.
The ACL for both PCD and non-PCD is determined by pooling loans with similar risk characteristics and using the approach discussed below under “Allowance for Credit Losses on Loans”.
Impaired Loans
Loans are considered “impaired” when it becomes probable that the Company will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the loan’s contractual terms. Non-accrual loans, loans past due greater than 90 days and still accruing, unless adequately secured and in the process of collection, and restructured loans qualify as “impaired loans.” Restructured loans involve the granting of a concession on the terms of a loan to a borrower experiencing financial difficulty. Concessions may be granted in various forms, including changes in payment schedule or interest rate.
When measuring impairment, the expected future cash flows of an impaired loan are discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate at origination. Alternatively, impairment can be measured by reference to an observable market price, if one exists, or the fair value of the collateral for a collateral-dependent loan. Loans and leases, which are deemed uncollectible, are charged off to the allowance for credit losses, while recoveries of amounts previously charged off are credited to the allowance for credit losses.
Loans are generally placed on non-accrual status when contractually past due 90 days or more as to interest or principal payments. Additionally, whenever management becomes aware of facts or circumstances that may adversely impact the collectability of principal or interest on loans, it is management’s practice to place such loans on non-accrual status immediately, rather than delaying such action until the loans become 90 days past due. Previously accrued and uncollected interest on such loans is reversed. Income is recorded only to the extent that a determination has been made that the principal balance of the loan is collectible and the interest payments are subsequently received in cash, or for a restructured loan, the borrower has made six consecutive contractual payments. If collectibility of the principal is in doubt, payments received are applied to loan principal.
Loans past due 90 days or more but still accruing interest are also generally included in nonperforming loans. Loans past due 90 days or more but still accruing are classified as such where the underlying loans are both well secured (the collateral value covers principal and accrued interest) and in the process of collection.
Allowance for Credit Losses on Loans
The ACL on loans is a valuation account that is deducted from the amortized cost basis to present the net amount expected to be collected. Loans are charged-off against the allowance when management believes the uncollectibility of a loan balance is confirmed.
Management estimates the allowance using relevant available information, from internal and external sources, relating to past events, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts. Credit loss experience provides the basis for the estimation of expected credit losses. Adjustments to historical loss information are made for differences in current loan-specific risk characteristics such as differences in underwriting standards, portfolio mix, delinquency level, or term as well as for changes in environmental conditions, such as changes in unemployment rates, property values, or other relevant factors.
The ACL on loans is measured on a collective basis when similar risk characteristics exist. The Company has identified the following portfolio segments:
C&I - C&I loans consist of loans to small and medium-sized businesses in a wide variety of industries. These loans are generally collateralized by inventory, accounts receivable, equipment, real estate and other commercial assets, and may be supported by other credit enhancements such as personal guarantees. Risk arises primarily due to a difference between expected and actual cash flows of the borrower. However, the recoverability of these loans is also dependent on other factors primarily dictated by the type of collateral securing these loans. The fair value of the collateral securing these loans may fluctuate as market conditions change. Included within C&I are revolving loans supported by borrowing bases that fluctuate depending on the amount of underlying collateral. A portion of C&I loans consists of sponsor finance, which are loans with senior debt exposure to private equity backed companies.
CRE - CRE loans include various types of loans for which the Company holds real property as collateral. Commercial real estate lending activity is typically restricted to owner-occupied properties or to investor properties that are owned by customers with a current banking relationship. The primary risks of CRE loans include the borrower’s inability to pay, material decreases in the value of the real estate being held as collateral and significant increases in interest rates, which may make the real estate mortgage loan unprofitable. Real estate loans may be more adversely affected by conditions in the real estate markets or in the general economy.
Construction and Land Development - The Company originates loans to finance construction projects including one- to four-family residences, multifamily residences, commercial office, and industrial projects. Construction loans are generally collateralized by first liens on the real estate and have floating interest rates. Construction loans are considered to have higher risks due to construction completion and timing risk, and the ultimate repayment being sensitive to interest rate changes, governmental regulation of real property and the availability of long-term financing. Additionally, economic conditions may impact the Company’s ability to recover its investment in construction loans. Adverse economic conditions may negatively impact the real estate market which could affect the borrowers’ ability to complete and sell the project. Additionally, the fair value of the underlying collateral may fluctuate as market conditions change.
Residential Real Estate - The Company originates loans to finance one- to four-family residences, secured by both first and second liens. Repayment of these loans is dependent on the borrowers’ ability to pay and the fair value of the underlying collateral. Residential loans with a second lien are inherently riskier due to the junior lien position.
Agricultural - Agricultural loans are generally secured with equipment, cattle, crops or other non-real property and at times the underlying real property. Agricultural loans are primarily included as a component of CRE and C&I loans.
Consumer - The Company provides a broad range of consumer loans to customers, including personal lines of credit, credit cards and automobile loans. Repayment of these loans is dependent on the borrowers’ ability to pay and the fair value of the underlying collateral. Consumer loans are included as a component of Other loans.
The Company utilizes a DCF method to measure the ACL on loans collectively evaluated that are sub-segmented by credit risk levels. The DCF method incorporates assumptions for probability of default, loss given default, prepayments and curtailments over the contractual term of the loans. In determining the probability of default, the Company utilized a regression analysis to determine certain economic factors that are relevant loss drivers in the portfolio segments based on historical or peer evaluations. National unemployment is a loss driver used in nearly all portfolios, except Consumer. The annual percentage change in gross domestic product is also used in C&I, Construction, Agricultural and Consumer portfolios. The annual percentage change in a commercial real estate index, national house price index and the consumer price index are used in the CRE, Residential Real Estate and Consumer portfolios, respectively. The contractual term excludes expected extensions, renewals, and modifications unless either of the following applies: management has a reasonable expectation at the reporting date that a troubled debt restructuring will be executed with an individual borrower or the extension or renewal options are included in the original or modified contract at the reporting date and are not unconditionally cancellable by the Company.
The Company uses a one-year reasonable and supportable forecast that considers baseline, upside and downside economic scenarios. For periods beyond the forecast period, the Company reverts to historical loss rates on a straight-line basis over a one-year period.
Loans that do not share risk characteristics are evaluated on an individual basis. Loans evaluated individually are not also included in the collective evaluation. When management determines that foreclosure is probable, expected credit losses are based on the fair value of the collateral at the reporting date, adjusted for selling costs as appropriate.
Loan Charge-Offs
Loans are charged-off when the primary and secondary sources of repayment (cash flow, collateral, guarantors, etc.) are less than their carrying value.
Other Real Estate
Other real estate represents property acquired through foreclosure or deeded to the Company in lieu of foreclosure on loans on which the borrowers have defaulted on the payment of principal or interest. Other real estate is recorded on an individual asset basis at the lower of cost or fair value less estimated costs to sell. The fair value of other real estate is based upon estimates of future cash flows, market value of similar assets, if available, or independent appraisals. These estimates involve significant uncertainties and judgments. As a result, fair value estimates may not be realizable in a current sale or settlement of the other real estate. Subsequent reductions in fair value are expensed within noninterest expense.
Gains and losses resulting from the sale of other real estate are credited or charged to current period earnings. Costs of maintaining and operating other real estate are expensed as incurred, and expenditures to complete or improve other real estate properties are capitalized if the expenditures are expected to be recovered upon ultimate sale of the property.
Fixed Assets
Buildings, leasehold improvements, furniture, fixtures, equipment, and capitalized software are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. All categories are computed using the straight-line method over their respective estimated useful lives. Furniture, fixtures and equipment is depreciated over three to ten years, buildings and leasehold improvements over ten to forty years, and capitalized software over three years based upon estimated lives or lease obligation periods.
State Tax Credits
The Company has purchased the rights to receive 10-year streams of state tax credits at agreed upon discount rates and sells such tax credits to its clients and others. State tax credits are accounted for at cost. The Company is also a minority partner in a joint venture, accounted for as an equity method investment, that purchases state income tax credits for resale to customers. Income from both the sale of state tax credits and earnings from the joint venture are reported as tax credit income in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Cash Surrender Value of Life Insurance
The Company has purchased bank-owned life insurance policies on certain bank officers. Bank-owned life insurance is recorded at its cash surrender value. Changes in the cash surrender values, including death benefits in excess of the carrying amount, are included in noninterest income.
Federal Home Loan Bank Stock
The Bank, as a member of the FHLB, is required to maintain an investment in the capital stock of the FHLB. The stock is redeemable at par by the FHLB, and is, therefore, carried at cost and periodically evaluated for impairment. The Company records FHLB dividends in interest income.
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
The Company tests goodwill for impairment on an annual basis and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the Company may not be able to recover the respective asset’s carrying amount. The Company’s annual test for impairment was performed in the fourth quarter of December 31, 2020. Such tests involve the use of estimates and assumptions. Core deposit intangibles are amortized using an accelerated method over an estimated useful life of approximately 10 years.
Potential impairments to goodwill must first be identified by performing a qualitative assessment which evaluates relevant events or circumstances to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. If this test indicates it is more likely than not that goodwill has been impaired, then a quantitative impairment test is completed. The quantitative impairment test calculates the fair value of the reporting unit and compares it with its carrying amount, including goodwill. If the carrying amount of goodwill exceeds its implied fair market value, an impairment loss is recognized. That loss is equal to the carrying amount of goodwill that is in excess of its implied fair market value.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
Long-lived assets, such as fixed assets and purchased intangibles subject to amortization, are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If the carrying amount of an asset exceeds its estimated future cash flows, an impairment charge is recognized in the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds the fair value of the asset. Assets to be disposed of are separately presented in the balance sheet and reported at the lower of the carrying amount or fair value less costs to sell, and are no longer depreciated. The assets and liabilities of a disposal group classified as held-for-sale are presented separately in the appropriate asset and liability sections of the balance sheet.
Derivative Financial Instruments and Hedging Activities
The Company uses derivative financial instruments to assist in the management of interest rate sensitivity and to modify the repricing, maturity and option characteristics of certain assets and liabilities. In addition, the Company also offers an interest rate hedge program that includes interest rate swaps to assist its customers in managing their interest rate risk profile. In order to eliminate the interest rate risk associated with offering these products, the Company enters into derivative contracts with third parties to offset the customer contracts.
Derivative instruments are required to be measured at fair value and recognized as either assets or liabilities in the consolidated financial statements. Fair value represents the payment the Company would receive or pay if the item were sold or bought in a current transaction. The accounting for changes in fair value (gains or losses) of a hedged item is dependent on whether the related derivative is designated and qualifies for “hedge accounting.” The Company assigns derivatives to one of these categories at the purchase date: cash flow hedge, fair value hedge, or non-designated derivatives. An assessment of the expected and ongoing hedge effectiveness of any derivative designated a fair value hedge or cash flow hedge is performed as required by the accounting standards. Derivatives are included in other assets and other liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets. The fair value amounts recognized for derivative instruments and the fair value amounts recognized for the right to reclaim or obligation to return cash collateral are not offset when represented under a master netting arrangement. Generally, the only derivative instruments used by the Company have been interest rate swaps, forward currency contracts, and interest rate caps.
Certain derivative financial instruments are not designated as cash flow or as fair value hedges for accounting purposes. These non-designated derivatives are intended to provide interest rate protection on net interest income or noninterest income but do not meet hedge accounting treatment. Customer accommodation interest rate swap contracts are not designated as hedging instruments. Changes in the fair value of these instruments are recorded in interest income or noninterest income in the consolidated statements of income depending on the underlying hedged item.
Income Taxes
The Company and its subsidiaries file a consolidated federal income tax return. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the estimated future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. We evaluate the need for deferred tax asset valuation allowances based on a more-likely-than-not standard. The ability to realize deferred tax assets depends on the ability to generate sufficient positive taxable income within the carryback or carryforward periods provided for in the laws for each applicable taxing jurisdiction. We consider the following possible sources of taxable income: future reversal patterns of existing taxable temporary differences, future taxable income exclusive of reversing temporary differences, taxable income in prior carryback years and the availability of qualified tax planning strategies. The assessment regarding whether a valuation allowance is required or should be adjusted depends on all available positive and negative factors including, but not limited to, nature, frequency, and severity of recent losses, duration of available carryforward periods, experience with tax attributes expiring unused and near and medium term financial outlook. Because of the complexity of tax laws and regulations, interpretation can be difficult and subject to legal judgment given specific facts and circumstances. It is possible that others, given the same information, may at any point in time reach different reasonable conclusions regarding the estimated amounts of accrued taxes.
Stock-Based Compensation
Stock-based compensation is recognized as an expense for stock options, restricted stock awards, performance stock units, and restricted stock units granted to employees, directors, and advisors in return for service. Equity classified awards are measured at the grant date fair value using either an observable market value or a valuation methodology, and recognized over the requisite service period on a straight-line basis. Forfeitures are recorded as they occur. A description of the Company’s stock-based employee compensation plan is described in “Note 16 - Stockholders’ Equity and Compensation Plans.”
Acquisitions and Divestitures
Acquisitions and business combinations are accounted for using the acquisition method of accounting. The assets and liabilities of the acquired entities have been recorded at their estimated fair values at the date of acquisition. Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of net assets acquired, including the amount assigned to identifiable intangible assets.
The purchase price allocation process requires an estimation of the fair values of the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed. When a business combination agreement provides for an adjustment to the cost of the combination contingent on future events, the Company includes an estimate of the acquisition-date fair value as part of the cost of the combination. To determine the fair values, the Company relies on third party valuations, such as appraisals, or internal valuations based on discounted cash flow analyses or other valuation techniques. The results of operations of the acquired business are included in the Company’s consolidated financial statements from the date of acquisition. Merger-related expenses include costs directly related to merger or acquisition activity and include legal and professional fees, system consolidation and conversion costs, and compensation costs such as severance and retention incentives for employees impacted by acquisition activity. The Company accounts for merger-related expenses in the periods in which the costs are incurred and the services are received.
For divestitures, the Company measures an asset (disposal group) classified as held-for-sale at the lower of its carrying value at the date the asset is initially classified as held-for-sale or its fair value less costs to sell. The Company reports the results of operations of an entity or group of components that either has been disposed of or held-for-sale as discontinued operations only if the disposal of that component represents a strategic shift that has or will have a major effect on an entity’s operations and financial results.
Any incremental direct costs incurred to transact the sale are allocated against the gain or loss on the sale. These costs would include items like legal fees, title transfer fees, broker fees, etc. Any goodwill and intangible assets associated with the portion of the reporting unit to be disposed of is included in the carrying amount of the business in determining the gain or loss on the sale.
Basic and Diluted Earnings Per Common Share
Basic earnings per common share data is calculated by dividing net income available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Common shares outstanding include common stock and restricted stock awards where recipients have satisfied the vesting terms. Diluted earnings per common share gives effect to all dilutive potential common shares outstanding during the period using the treasury stock method.
Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income
The Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income includes the amount and the related tax impact that have been reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income to net income. The classification adjustment for unrealized loss/gain on sale of securities included in net income has been recorded through the gain on sale of investment securities line item, within noninterest income, in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Reclassifications
Certain amounts reported in prior periods have been reclassified to conform to the current presentation. The reclassifications had no effect on net income or shareholders’ equity.
NOTE 2 - ACQUISITIONS & DIVESTITURES
The acquisitions noted below have been accounted for as business combinations using the acquisition method of accounting which requires assets acquired and liabilities assumed to be recognized at fair value as of the acquisition date. Goodwill arising from the acquisitions consist largely of the synergies and economies of scale expected from combining the operations into Enterprise. None of the goodwill recognized is expected to be deductible for income tax purposes.
The following tables present the assets acquired and liabilities assumed. Additional adjustments may be recorded during the measurement period specified in ASC 805, Business Combinations, as additional information becomes known.
Acquisition of Seacoast Commerce Banc Holdings
On November 12, 2020, the Company closed its acquisition of 100% of Seacoast and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Seacoast Commerce Bank. Seacoast operated five full-service retail and commercial banking offices in California and Nevada, as well as SBA loan production offices and deposit production offices in Arizona, California, Colorado, Illinois, Indiana, Massachusetts, Michigan, Nevada, Ohio, Oregon, Texas, Utah, and Washington.
Seacoast shareholders received 0.5061 shares of EFSC common stock for each Seacoast common share and cash in lieu of any fractional shares. In connection with the merger, Enterprise issued approximately 5.0 million shares of EFSC Common Stock valued at $33.56 per share, which was the closing price of Enterprise common stock on November 12, 2020. The value of the transaction consideration was approximately $169 million. The Company recognized $4.2 million of merger-related costs recorded in noninterest expense in the statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2020.
($ in thousands) As Recorded by Seacoast Adjustments As Recorded by EFSC
Assets acquired:
Cash and cash equivalents $ 63,744 $ - $ 63,744
Loans 1,160,602 29,839 (a) 1,190,441
Other investments 12,100 - 12,100
Fixed assets 925 (275) (b) 650
Accrued interest receivable 4,511 - 4,511
Goodwill 35,395 (35,395) (c) -
Intangible assets 1,513 1,168 (d) 2,681
Deferred tax assets 12,009 (8,687) (e) 3,322
Other assets 35,025 (437) (f) 34,588
Total assets acquired $ 1,325,824 $ (13,787) $ 1,312,037
Liabilities assumed:
Deposits $ 1,081,034 $ (28) (f) $ 1,081,006
PPPLF advances 86,096 - 86,096
Accrued interest payable 185 - 185
Other liabilities 25,211 1,097 (f) 26,308
Total liabilities assumed $ 1,192,526 $ 1,069 $ 1,193,595
Net assets acquired $ 133,298 $ (14,856) $ 118,442
Consideration paid:
Cash $ 1,630
Common stock 167,035
Total consideration paid $ 168,665
Goodwill $ 50,223
(a)Fair value adjustments based on the Company’s evaluation of the acquired loan portfolio, write-off of net deferred loan costs and elimination of the allowance for loan losses recorded by Seacoast.
(b)Fair value adjustments based on the Company’s evaluation of the acquired premises and equipment.
(c)Adjustment to eliminate goodwill.
(d)Eliminate acquired intangibles and record the core deposit intangible asset on the acquired core deposit accounts. Amount to be amortized using a sum-of-years digits method over a useful life of 10 years.
(e)Adjustment for deferred taxes.
(f)Other miscellaneous fair value adjustments.
The following table provides the unaudited pro forma information for the results of operations for the twelve months ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, as if the acquisition had occurred on January 1, 2019. The pro forma results combine the historical results of Seacoast with the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income, adjusted for the impact of the application of the acquisition method of accounting including amortization and accretion of fair value adjustments. The pro forma results have been prepared for comparative purposes only and are not necessarily indicative of the results that would have been obtained had the acquisition actually occurred on January 1, 2019. No assumptions have been applied to the pro forma results of operations regarding possible revenue enhancements, expense efficiencies or asset dispositions. Only the acquisition-related expenses that have been incurred as of December 31, 2020 are included in net income in the table below.
Pro Forma
Twelve months ended December 31,
($ in thousands, except per share data) 2020 2019
Total revenue (net interest income plus noninterest income) $ 381,914 $ 355,500
Net income 93,918 86,888
Diluted earnings per common share 3.00 2.79
Acquisition of Trinity Capital Corporation.
On March 8, 2019, the Company closed its acquisition of 100% of Trinity and its wholly-owned subsidiary, LANB. Trinity operated six full-service retail and commercial banking offices in Los Alamos, Santa Fe, and Albuquerque, New Mexico.
Trinity shareholders received cash consideration of $1.84 per share of Trinity common stock and 0.1972 shares of EFSC common stock per share of Trinity common stock with cash in lieu of fractional shares. Aggregate consideration at closing was approximately 4.0 million shares of EFSC common stock and $37.3 million cash paid to Trinity shareholders. Based on EFSC’s closing stock price of $43.07 on March 7, 2019, the overall transaction had a value of $209.2 million. The Company recognized $18.0 million and $1.3 million of merger-related costs recorded in noninterest expense in the statement of operations for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.
The following table presents the assets acquired and liabilities assumed of Trinity as of March 8, 2019.
($ in thousands) As Recorded by Trinity Adjustments As Recorded by EFSC
Assets acquired:
Cash and cash equivalents $ 13,899 $ - $ 13,899
Interest-earning deposits greater than 90 days 100 - 100
Securities 428,715 (619) (a) 428,096
Loans 705,057 (20,743) (b) 684,314
Other real estate 5,284 (2,059) (c) 3,225
Other investments 6,673 - 6,673
Fixed assets 27,586 (300) (d) 27,286
Accrued interest receivable 3,997 - 3,997
Intangible assets - 23,066 (e) 23,066
Deferred tax assets 10,708 (2,386) (f) 8,322
Other assets 35,045 (1,484) (g) 33,561
Total assets acquired $ 1,237,064 $ (4,525) $ 1,232,539
Liabilities assumed:
Deposits $ 1,081,151 $ 36 (g) $ 1,081,187
Subordinated debentures 26,806 (3,972) (g) 22,834
FHLB advances 6,800 171 (g) 6,971
Accrued interest payable 370 - 370
Other liabilities 5,842 (827) (g) 5,015
Total liabilities assumed $ 1,120,969 $ (4,592) $ 1,116,377
Net assets acquired $ 116,095 $ 67 $ 116,162
Consideration paid:
Cash $ 37,275
Common stock 171,885
Total consideration paid $ 209,160
Goodwill $ 92,998
(a)Fair value adjustments of the securities portfolio.
(b)Fair value adjustments based on the Company’s evaluation of the acquired loan portfolio, write-off of net deferred loan costs and elimination of the allowance for loan losses recorded by Trinity.
(c)Fair value adjustment based on the Company’s evaluation of the acquired other real estate portfolio.
(d)Fair value adjustments based on the Company’s evaluation of the acquired premises and equipment.
(e)Record the core deposit intangible asset on the acquired core deposit accounts. Amount to be amortized using a sum-of-years digits method over a useful life of 10 years.
(f)Adjustment for deferred taxes.
(g)Other miscellaneous fair value adjustments.
The following table provides the unaudited pro forma information for the results of operations for the twelve months ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, as if the acquisition had occurred on January 1, 2018. The pro forma results combine the historical results of Trinity with the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income, adjusted for the impact of the application of the acquisition method of accounting including loan discount accretion, intangible assets amortization, and deposit and trust preferred securities premium accretion, net of taxes. The pro forma results have been prepared for comparative purposes only and are not necessarily indicative of the results that would have been obtained had the acquisition actually occurred on January 1, 2018. No assumptions have been applied to the pro forma results of operations regarding possible revenue enhancements, expense efficiencies or
asset dispositions. Only the acquisition-related expenses that have been incurred as of December 31, 2019 are included in net income in the table below.
Pro Forma
Twelve months ended December 31,
($ in thousands, except per share data) 2019 2018
Total revenue (net interest income plus noninterest income) $ 296,677 $ 286,076
Net income 107,626 85,579
Diluted earnings per common share 4.11 3.14
NOTE 3 - EARNINGS PER SHARE
The following table presents a summary of earnings per common share data and amounts for the periods indicated.
Year ended December 31,
($ in thousands, except per share data) 2020 2019 2018
Net income $ 74,384 $ 92,739 $ 89,217
Weighted average common shares outstanding 26,954 26,045 23,100
Additional dilutive common stock equivalents 35 114 189
Weighted average diluted common shares outstanding 26,989 26,159 23,289
Basic earnings per common share: $ 2.76 $ 3.56 $ 3.86
Diluted earnings per common share: $ 2.76 $ 3.55 $ 3.83
For 2020 and 2019, common stock equivalents of approximately 156,000 and 21,000, respectively, were excluded from the earnings per share calculation because their effect would have been anti-dilutive. For 2018, the amount was immaterial.
NOTE 4 - INVESTMENTS
The following table presents the amortized cost, gross unrealized gains and losses and fair value of securities available-for-sale and held-to-maturity:
December 31, 2020
($ in thousands) Amortized Cost Gross
Unrealized Gains Gross
Unrealized Losses Fair Value
Available-for-sale securities:
Obligations of U.S. Government-sponsored enterprises $ 14,978 $ 186 $ (3) $ 15,161
Obligations of states and political subdivisions 335,271 8,994 (33) 344,232
Agency mortgage-backed securities 506,703 20,190 (321) 526,572
Corporate debt securities 14,750 248 - 14,998
U.S. Treasury Bills 10,980 486 - 11,466
Total securities available-for-sale $ 882,682 $ 30,104 $ (357) $ 912,429
Held-to-maturity securities:
Obligations of states and political subdivisions $ 248,324 $ 2,814 $ - $ 251,138
Agency mortgage-backed securities 112,742 2,295 (496) 114,541
Corporate debt securities 126,993 8,851 - 135,844
Total securities held-to-maturity $ 488,059 $ 13,960 $ (496) $ 501,523
Less: Allowance for credit losses 449
Total securities held-to-maturity, net $487,610
December 31, 2019
($ in thousands) Amortized Cost Gross
Unrealized Gains Gross
Unrealized Losses Fair Value
Available-for-sale securities:
Obligations of U.S. Government-sponsored enterprises $ 9,954 $ 92 $ - $ 10,046
Obligations of states and political subdivisions 207,269 6,118 (363) 213,024
Agency mortgage-backed securities 888,129 15,083 (1,191) 902,021
U.S. Treasury Bills 9,971 255 - 10,226
Total securities available-for-sale $ 1,115,323 $ 21,548 $ (1,554) $ 1,135,317
Held-to-maturity securities:
Obligations of states and political subdivisions $ 11,704 $ 170 $ - $ 11,874
Agency mortgage-backed securities 46,346 675 - 47,021
Corporate debt securities 123,116 128 (200) 123,044
Total securities held-to-maturity $ 181,166 $ 973 $ (200) $ 181,939
During 2020 and 2019, the Company transferred securities with a book value of $331.0 million and $116.3 million and fair value of $352.6 million and $123.2 million, respectively, from available-for-sale to held-to-maturity. The Company believes the held-to-maturity category is more consistent with the Company’s intent for these securities. The transfer of securities was made at fair value at the time of transfer. The unamortized portion of the unrealized holding gain at the time of transfer is retained in accumulated other comprehensive income and in the carrying value of held-to-maturity securities. Accordingly, the balance of held-to-maturity securities in the “Amortized cost”
column in the table above includes a net unamortized unrealized gain of $25.6 million and $6.6 million at December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively. Such amounts are amortized over the remaining life of the securities.
At December 31, 2020, and 2019, there were no holdings of securities of any one issuer in an amount greater than 10% of shareholders’ equity, other than the U.S. Government agencies and sponsored enterprises. The agency mortgage-backed securities are all issued by U.S. Government-sponsored enterprises. Securities having a fair value of $525.8 million and $484.8 million at December 31, 2020, and December 31, 2019, respectively, were pledged as collateral to secure deposits of public institutions and for other purposes as required by law or contract provisions.
The amortized cost and estimated fair value of debt securities at December 31, 2020, by contractual maturity, are shown below. Expected maturities may differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties. The weighted average life of the agency mortgage-backed securities is approximately 3 years.
Available-for-sale Held-to-maturity
($ in thousands) Amortized Cost Estimated
Fair Value Amortized Cost Estimated
Fair Value
Due in one year or less $ 12,048 $ 12,240 $ - $ -
Due after one year through five years 21,977 22,629 11,589 12,040
Due after five years through ten years 19,711 20,105 132,613 141,252
Due after ten years 322,243 330,883 231,115 233,690
Agency mortgage-backed securities 506,703 526,572 112,742 114,541
$ 882,682 $ 912,429 $ 488,059 $ 501,523
There were 30 available-for-sale securities and 73 available-for-sale and held-to-maturity securities in an unrealized loss position as of December 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019, respectively, included in the following tables:
December 31, 2020
Less than 12 months 12 months or more Total
($ in thousands) Fair Value Unrealized Losses Fair Value Unrealized Losses Fair Value Unrealized Losses
Obligations of U.S. Government-sponsored enterprises $ 4,997 $ 3 $ - $ - $ 4,997 $ 3
Obligations of states and political subdivisions 4,079 33 - - 4,079 33
Agency mortgage-backed securities 65,986 321 - - 65,986 321
$ 75,062 $ 357 $ - $ - $ 75,062 $ 357
The following table presents a summary of available-for-sale and held-to-maturity investment securities in an unrealized loss position:
December 31, 2019
Less than 12 months 12 months or more Total
($ in thousands) Fair Value Unrealized Losses Fair Value Unrealized Losses Fair Value Unrealized Losses
Obligations of states and political subdivisions 56,327 363 - - 56,327 363
Agency mortgage-backed securities 131,693 756 41,491 435 173,184 1,191
Corporate debt securities 67,964 200 - - 67,964 200
$ 255,984 $ 1,319 $ 41,491 $ 435 $ 297,475 $ 1,754
The unrealized losses at both December 31, 2020, and 2019, were primarily attributable to changes in market interest rates since the securities were purchased. At December 31, 2020, the Company had not recorded an ACL on
available-for-sale securities. At December 31, 2019, the Company had not recognized an other-than-temporary impairment.
Accrued interest receivable on held-to-maturity debt securities totaled $3.6 million at December 31, 2020 and is excluded from the estimate of expected credit losses. The estimate of expected credit losses considers historical credit loss information adjusted for current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts. At December 31, 2020, the ACL on held-to-maturity securities was $0.4 million.
The gross gains and losses realized from sales of available-for-sale investment securities were as follows:
December 31,
($ in thousands) 2020 2019 2018
Gross gains realized $ 421 $ 400 $ 9
Gross losses realized - (449) -
Proceeds from sales 20,221 357,976 1,451
Other Investments
At December 31, 2020, and 2019, other investments totaled $48.8 million and $38.0 million, respectively. As a member of the FHLB system administered by the Federal Housing Finance Agency, the Bank is required to maintain a minimum investment in capital stock with the FHLB consisting of membership stock and activity-based stock. The FHLB capital stock of $10.8 million, and $15.7 million at December 31, 2020, and 2019, respectively, is recorded at cost, which represents redemption value, and is included in other investments in the consolidated balance sheets. The remaining amounts in other investments primarily include various investments in SBICs, CDFIs, and the Company’s investment in unconsolidated trusts used to issue preferred securities to third parties, see “Note 11 - Subordinated Debentures.”
NOTE 5 - LOANS
Below is a summary of loans by category at December 31, 2020 and 2019:
($ in thousands) December 31, 2020 December 31, 2019*
Commercial and industrial $ 3,100,299 $ 2,361,157
Real estate loans:
Commercial - investor owned 1,589,419 1,299,884
Commercial - owner occupied 1,498,408 697,437
Construction and land development 546,686 457,273
Residential 319,179 366,261
Total real estate loans 3,953,692 2,820,855
Other 187,083 134,941
Loans, before unearned loan fees 7,241,074 5,316,953
Unearned loan fees, net (16,139) (2,616)
Loans, including unearned loan fees $ 7,224,935 $ 5,314,337
*Includes $90.3 million of loans previously reported as PCI.
PPP loans totaled $709.9 million at December 31, 2020, or $698.6 million net of unearned fees of $11.3 million. The loan balance includes a net premium on acquired loans of $16.1 million at December 31, 2020, and a net discount of $36.0 million at December 31, 2019. At December 31, 2020 loans of $2.5 billion were pledged to FHLB and the Federal Reserve Bank.
Following is a summary of activity for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019 of loans to executive officers and directors, or to entities in which such individuals had beneficial interests as a shareholder, officer, or director. Such loans were made in the normal course of business on substantially the same terms, including interest rates and collateral, as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with other customers and did not involve more than the normal risk of collectibility.
($ in thousands) December 31, 2020 December 31, 2019
Balance at beginning of year $ 5,475 $ 17,169
New loans and advances 2,013 1,376
Payments and other reductions (1,771) (13,070)
Balance at end of year $ 5,717 $ 5,475
A summary of the activity, by loan category, in the allowance for loan losses for 2018 and 2019, excluding the allowance on PCI loans, and the ACL on loans for 2020 is as follows:
($ in thousands) Commercial and industrial CRE - investor owned CRE - owner occupied Construction and land development Residential real estate Other Total
Balance at December 31, 2018
Allowance for loan losses:
Balance, beginning of year $ 26,406 $ 3,890 $ 3,308 $ 1,487 $ 2,237 $ 838 $ 38,166
Provision for loan losses 8,394 709 1,216 97 (583) (20) 9,813
Charge-offs (6,894) - (313) (56) (546) (167) (7,976)
Recoveries 1,133 84 28 459 508 80 2,292
Balance, end of year $ 29,039 $ 4,683 $ 4,239 $ 1,987 $ 1,616 $ 731 $ 42,295
Balance at December 31, 2019
Allowance for loan losses:
Balance, beginning of year $ 29,039 $ 4,683 $ 4,239 $ 1,987 $ 1,616 $ 731 $ 42,295
Provision for loan losses 4,801 1,708 673 (237) (330) 67 6,682
Charge-offs (6,882) (551) (58) (54) (667) (382) (8,594)
Recoveries 338 95 19 776 661 295 2,184
Balance, end of year $ 27,296 $ 5,935 $ 4,873 $ 2,472 $ 1,280 $ 711 $ 42,567
Balance at December 31, 2020
Allowance for credit losses:
Balance at December 31, 2019 $ 27,296 $ 5,935 $ 4,873 $ 2,472 $ 1,280 $ 711 $ 42,567
PCI allowance at December 31, 2019 159 - - 139 - 423 721
CECL adoption 6,494 10,726 2,598 5,183 3,470 (84) 28,387
PCD loans immediately charged off - (5) (57) (217) (1,401) - (1,680)
Balance, beginning of year $ 33,949 $ 16,656 $ 7,414 $ 7,577 $ 3,349 $ 1,050 $ 69,995
Provision for loan losses 28,373 11,037 7,845 13,438 674 2,012 63,379
Initial allowance on acquired PCD loans 23 2,026 1,427 45 3 - 3,524
Charge-offs (5,381) (498) (30) (31) (408) (391) (6,739)
Recoveries 1,848 2,841 356 384 967 116 6,512
Balance, end of year $ 58,812 $ 32,062 $ 17,012 $ 21,413 $ 4,585 $ 2,787 $ 136,671
The ACL on sponsor finance loans, which is included in the categories above, represented $19.0 million as of December 31, 2020.
On January 1, 2020, the Company adopted the CECL methodology which added $28.4 million to the ACL on loans. Upon adoption, $1.7 million of nonaccrual PCD loans with individual outstanding balances of less than $100,000 were immediately charged-off. Under the CECL method, the Company recorded $63.4 million in provision for credit losses on loans in the twelve months ended December 31, 2020, compared to $6.7 million in provision for loan losses in the prior year period (excluding the allowance release on PCI loans), under the incurred loss method. The increase in the provision for credit losses in 2020 was primarily due to a change in economic forecasts from the end of 2019 due to the COVID-19 pandemic.
The CECL methodology incorporates various economic scenarios. The Company utilizes three forecasts in the model, Moody’s baseline, a stronger near-term growth upside and a moderate recession downside forecast. The Company weights these scenarios at 70%, 5%, and 25%, respectively, which added approximately $5.9 million to the ACL over the baseline model. These forecasts incorporate an accommodative monetary policy and the current impact of government stimulus. The Company has also recognized the risk posed by loans that have received multiple deferrals of principal and interest payments, including the hospitality sector, by allocating additional reserves to those segments. Some of the key risks to the forecasts that could result in future provision for credit losses are additional shutdowns and self-quarantines if another significant wave of COVID hits, small-business bankruptcies occur at higher levels, or unemployment increases.
In addition to the CECL methodology, the Company incorporates qualitative adjustments into the ACL on loans to capture credit risks inherent within the loan portfolio that are not captured in the DCF model. Included in these risks are 1) changes in lending policies and procedures, 2) actual and expected changes in business and economic conditions, 3) changes in the nature and volume of the portfolio, 4) changes in lending management, 5) changes in volume and the severity of past due loans, 6) changes in the quality of the loan review system, 7) changes in the value of underlying collateral, 8) the existence and effect of concentrations of credit and 9) other factors such as the regulatory, legal and competitive environments and events such as natural disasters and pandemics. At December 31, 2020, the ACL on loans included a qualitative adjustment of approximately $24.0 million. Of this amount, approximately $11.1 million was allocated to Sponsor Finance loans due to their unsecured nature and the increased risk associated with payment deferrals in that portfolio.
The recorded investment in nonperforming loans by category at December 31, 2020 and 2019 is as follows:
December 31, 2020
($ in thousands) Non-accrual Restructured, accruing Loans over 90 days past due and still accruing interest Total nonperforming loans Nonaccrual loans with no allowance
Commercial and industrial $ 18,158 $ 3,482 $ 130 $ 21,770 $ 8,316
Real estate:
Commercial - investor owned 9,579 - - 9,579 716
Commercial - owner occupied 2,940 - - 2,940 6,024
Residential 4,112 77 - 4,189
Other 29 - - 29 3,190
Total $ 34,818 $ 3,559 $ 130 $ 38,507 $ 18,246
December 31, 2019
($ in thousands) Non-accrual Restructured, accruing Loans over 90 days past due and still accruing interest Total nonperforming loans Nonaccrual loans with no allowance
Commercial and industrial $ 22,328 $ - $ 250 $ 22,578 $ 7,654
Real estate:
Commercial - investor owned 2,303 - - 2,303 811
Commercial - owner occupied 213 - - 213 213
Residential 1,251 79 - 1,330 1,120
Other 1 - - 1 -
Total $ 26,096 $ 79 $ 250 $ 26,425 $ 9,798
The following table presents the amortized cost basis of collateral-dependent nonperforming loans by class of loan at December 31, 2020:
Type of Collateral
(in thousands) Commercial Real Estate Residential Real Estate Blanket Lien Other
Commercial and industrial $ 8,316 $ - $ 394 $ -
Real estate:
Commercial - investor owned 9,579 - - -
Commercial - owner occupied 2,940 - - -
Residential - 4,135 - -
Other - - - 17
Total $ 20,835 $ 4,135 $ 394 $ 17
The recorded investment by category for loans restructured during the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019 is as follows:
Year ended December 31, 2020 Year ended December 31, 2019
($ in thousands, except for number of loans) Number of Loans Pre-Modification Outstanding
Recorded Balance Post-Modification Outstanding
Recorded Balance Number of Loans Pre-Modification Outstanding
Recorded Balance Post-Modification Outstanding
Recorded Balance
Commercial and industrial 3 $ 7,447 $ 7,447 - $ - $ -
Real estate:
Commercial - owner occupied - - - 1 188 188
Residential 3 372 372 2 332 332
Total 6 $ 7,819 $ 7,819 3 $ 520 $ 520
Restructured loans primarily resulted from interest rate concessions. As of December 31, 2020, the Company allocated an immaterial amount in specific reserves to loans that have been restructured.
Loans restructured that subsequently defaulted during the year ended December 31, 2019 are as follows:
Year ended December 31, 2019
($ in thousands, except for number of loans) Number of Loans Recorded Balance
Commercial and industrial 2 $ 352
Total 2 $ 352
There were no restructured loans that subsequently defaulted during the year ended December 31, 2020.
In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the Company has implemented short-term deferral programs allowing customers to primarily defer payments for up to 90 days. Deferrals under the CARES Act or interagency guidance are not included above as troubled debt restructurings. As of December 31, 2020, $687.8 million in loans have participated in the programs, including $340.0 million in loans deferring full principal and interest payments and $347.8 million in loans deferring principal only. As of December 31, 2020, $63.0 million loans remain in a deferral status. Interest of $4.1 million has been deferred and will be collected upon final maturity.
The aging of the recorded investment in past due loans by class and category at December 31, 2020 and 2019 is shown below:
December 31, 2020
($ in thousands) 30-89 Days
Past Due 90 or More
Days
Past Due Total
Past Due Current Total
Commercial and industrial $ 8,652 $ 12,928 $ 21,580 $ 3,067,415 $ 3,088,995
Real estate:
Commercial - investor owned 734 9,301 10,035 1,579,384 1,589,419
Commercial - owner occupied 328 4,647 4,975 1,493,433 1,498,408
Construction and land development 13 - 13 546,673 546,686
Residential 2,071 2,118 4,189 314,990 319,179
Other 1,731 50 1,781 180,467 182,248
Total $ 13,529 $ 29,044 $ 42,573 $ 7,182,362 $ 7,224,935
December 31, 2019
($ in thousands) 30-89 Days
Past Due 90 or More
Days
Past Due Total
Past Due Current Total
Commercial and industrial $ 5,679 $ 8,212 $ 13,891 $ 2,331,932 $ 2,345,823
Real estate:
Commercial - investor owned 321 1,492 1,813 1,261,168 1,262,981
Commercial - owner occupied 562 213 775 677,747 678,522
Construction and land development 308 - 308 449,072 449,380
Residential 4,689 595 5,284 349,908 355,192
Other 81 - 81 132,069 132,150
Total $ 11,640 $ 10,512 $ 22,152 $ 5,201,896 $ 5,224,048
The Company categorizes loans into risk categories based on relevant information about the ability of borrowers to service their debt, such as current financial information, historical payment experience, credit documentation, and current economic factors among other factors. This analysis is performed on a quarterly basis. The Company uses the following definitions for risk ratings:
•Grades 1, 2, and 3 - Includes loans to borrowers with a continuous record of strong earnings, sound balance sheet condition and capitalization, ample liquidity with solid cash flow, and whose management team has experience and depth within their industry.
•Grade 4 - Includes loans to borrowers with positive trends in profitability, satisfactory capitalization and balance sheet condition, and sufficient liquidity and cash flow.
•Grade 5 - Includes loans to borrowers that may display fluctuating trends in sales, profitability, capitalization, liquidity, and cash flow.
•Grade 6 - Includes loans to borrowers where an adverse change or perceived weakness has occurred, but may be correctable in the near future. Alternatively, this rating category may also include circumstances
where the borrower is starting to reverse a negative trend or condition, or has recently been upgraded from a 7, 8, or 9 rating.
•Grade 7 - Watch credits are borrowers that have experienced financial setback of a nature that is not determined to be severe or influence ‘ongoing concern’ expectations. Although possible, no loss is anticipated, due to strong collateral and/or guarantor support.
•Grade 8 - Substandard credits will include those borrowers characterized by significant losses and sustained downward trends in balance sheet condition, liquidity, and cash flow. Repayment reliance may have shifted to secondary sources. Collateral exposure may exist and additional reserves may be warranted.
•Grade 9 - Doubtful credits include borrowers that may show deteriorating trends that are unlikely to be corrected. Collateral values may appear insufficient for full recovery, therefore requiring a partial charge-off, or debt renegotiation with the borrower. The borrower may have declared bankruptcy or bankruptcy is likely in the near term. All doubtful rated credits will be on non-accrual.
The recorded investment by risk category of the loans by class at December 31, 2020, which is based upon the most recent analysis performed is as follows:
Term Loans by Origination Year
(in thousands) 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 Prior Revolving Loans Converted to Term Loans Revolving Loans Total
Commercial and industrial
Pass (1-6) $ 1,402,276 $ 454,729 $ 262,258 $ 132,832 $ 25,057 $ 58,315 $ 14,118 $ 527,170 $ 2,876,755
Watch (7) 44,922 15,369 9,585 7,509 19,613 110 - 60,448 157,556
Classified (8-9) 6,602 9,219 3,115 3,964 4,490 1,080 1,281 22,432 52,183
Total Commercial and industrial $ 1,453,800 $ 479,317 $ 274,958 $ 144,305 $ 49,160 $ 59,505 $ 15,399 $ 610,050 $ 3,086,494
Commercial real estate-investor owned
Pass (1-6) $ 481,867 $ 338,843 $ 189,305 $ 131,718 $ 138,288 $ 161,439 $ 6,509 $ 32,058 $ 1,480,027
Watch (7) 32,308 19,722 6,656 - 9,647 17,370 - - 85,703
Classified (8-9) - 5,278 8,716 5,830 1,245 2,620 - - 23,689
Total Commercial real estate-investor owned $ 514,175 $ 363,843 $ 204,677 $ 137,548 $ 149,180 $ 181,429 $ 6,509 $ 32,058 $ 1,589,419
Commercial real estate-owner occupied
Pass (1-6) $ 419,142 $ 287,001 $ 215,181 $ 179,382 $ 104,470 $ 167,456 $ 2,672 $ 45,323 $ 1,420,627
Watch (7) 13,657 5,257 3,113 6,198 4,338 8,460 1,776 941 43,740
Classified (8-9) 2,420 7,427 5,822 6,140 1,309 10,860 - 63 34,041
Total Commercial real estate-owner occupied $ 435,219 $ 299,685 $ 224,116 $ 191,720 $ 110,117 $ 186,776 $ 4,448 $ 46,327 $ 1,498,408
Construction real estate
Pass (1-6) $ 223,069 $ 156,360 $ 45,460 $ 18,579 $ 11,539 $ 9,144 $ - $ 28,880 $ 493,031
Watch (7) 2,544 86 34,179 11,632 - 2,499 - - 50,940
Classified (8-9) 56 2,124 503 1 - 31 - - 2,715
Total Construction real estate $ 225,669 $ 158,570 $ 80,142 $ 30,212 $ 11,539 $ 11,674 $ - $ 28,880 $ 546,686
Residential real estate
Pass (1-6) $ 57,059 $ 27,907 $ 17,718 $ 17,138 $ 27,443 $ 92,657 $ 1,172 $ 66,902 $ 307,996
Watch (7) 210 840 526 - 514 1,603 287 511 4,491
Classified (8-9) 571 733 121 14 898 3,181 - 253 5,771
Total residential real estate $ 57,840 $ 29,480 $ 18,365 $ 17,152 $ 28,855 $ 97,441 $ 1,459 $ 67,666 $ 318,258
Other
Pass (1-6) $ 43,526 $ 28,195 $ 30,074 $ 9,646 $ 5,641 $ 17,027 $ - $ 40,779 $ 174,888
Watch (7) - 1 8 - - 2,637 - 1 2,647
Classified (8-9) - 18 19 13 - 17 8 4 79
Total Other $ 43,526 $ 28,214 $ 30,101 $ 9,659 $ 5,641 $ 19,681 $ 8 $ 40,784 $ 177,614
In the table above, loan originations in 2020 and 2019 with a classification of watch or classified primarily represent renewals or modifications initially underwritten and originated in prior years.
For certain loans, primarily credit cards, the Company evaluates credit quality based on the aging status.
The following table presents the recorded investment on loans based on payment activity:
December 31, 2020
(in thousands) Performing Non Performing Total
Commercial and industrial $ 2,502 $ - $ 2,502
Real estate:
Residential 921 - 921
Other 4,612 21 4,633
Total $ 8,035 $ 21 $ 8,056
The recorded investment by risk category of the loans by class and category at December 31, 2019 is as follows:
December 31, 2019
($ in thousands) Pass (1-6) Watch (7) Classified (8 & 9) Total*
Commercial and industrial $ 2,151,084 $ 124,718 $ 70,021 $ 2,345,823
Real estate:
Commercial - investor owned 1,242,569 17,572 2,840 1,262,981
Commercial - owner occupied 643,276 28,773 6,473 678,522
Construction and land development 437,134 12,140 106 449,380
Residential 348,246 4,450 2,496 355,192
Other 132,096 3 51 132,150
Total $ 4,954,405 $ 187,656 $ 81,987 $ 5,224,048
*Excludes $90.3 million of loans previously accounted for as PCI
The Company has purchased loans, for which there was, at acquisition, evidence of more than insignificant deterioration of credit quality since origination. The carrying amount of those loans is as follows:
($ in thousands) At November 12, 2020
Par value of acquired loans $ 137,693
Allowance for credit losses (3,524)
Non-credit premium 928
Purchase price of acquired loans $ 135,097
NOTE 6 - LEASES
The Company has banking and limited-service facilities, datacenters, and certain equipment leased under agreements. Most of the leases expire between 2021 and 2025 and include one or more renewal options of up to 5 years. One lease expires in 2031. All leases are classified as operating leases.
For the twelve months ended
($ in thousands) December 31, 2020 December 31, 2019
Operating lease cost $ 3,207 $ 3,301
Short-term lease cost 201 288
Total lease cost $ 3,408 $ 3,589
Payments on operating leases included in the measurement of lease liabilities during each of the twelve months ended December 31, 2020 and 2019 totaled $3.3 million. Right-of-use assets obtained in exchange for lease obligations totaled $1.6 million and $5.2 million during the twelve months ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively. The additions in 2020 were primarily from the Seacoast acquisition.
Supplemental balance sheet information related to leases was as follows:
As of
($ in thousands) December 31, 2020 December 31, 2019
Operating lease right-of-use assets, included in other assets $ 13,636 $ 14,843
Operating lease liabilities, included in other liabilities 14,152 15,461
Operating leases
Weighted average remaining lease term 5 years 6 years
Weighted average discount rate 2.5 % 2.7 %
Maturities of operating lease liabilities were as follows:
($ in thousands)
Year Amount
2021 $ 4,043
2022 2,988
2023 2,622
2024 2,190
2025 978
Thereafter 2,266
Total operating lease liabilities, payments 15,087
Less: present value adjustment 935
Operating lease liabilities $ 14,152
Lessor income was $1.8 million and $0.9 million during the twelve months ended December 31, 2020, and 2019, respectively.
NOTE 7 - DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
Risk Management Objective of Using Derivatives
The Company is exposed to certain risk arising from both its business operations and economic conditions. The Company principally manages its exposures to a wide variety of business and operational risks through management of its core business activities. The Company manages economic risks, including interest rate, liquidity, and credit risk primarily by managing the amount, sources, and duration of its assets and liabilities and the use of derivative financial instruments. Specifically, the Company enters into derivative financial instruments to manage exposures that arise from business activities that result in the receipt or payment of future known and uncertain cash amounts, the value of which are determined by interest rates. The Company’s derivative financial instruments are used to manage differences in the amount, timing, and duration of the Company’s known or expected cash receipts and its known or expected cash payments principally related to the Company’s borrowings. The Company does not enter into derivative financial instruments for trading purposes.
Cash Flow Hedges of Interest Rate Risk
The Company’s objectives in using interest rate derivatives are to add stability to interest expense and to manage its exposure to interest rate movements. To accomplish this objective, the Company primarily uses interest rate swaps as part of its interest rate risk management strategy. Interest rate swaps designated as cash flow hedges involve the receipt of variable amounts from a counterparty in exchange for the Company making fixed-rate payments over the life of the agreements without exchange of the underlying notional amount. The Company has executed a series of cash flow hedges to fix the effective interest rate for payments due on $62.0 million of LIBOR-based junior subordinated debentures to a weighted-average-fixed rate of 2.62%. Select terms of the hedges are as follows:
$ in thousands
Notional Fixed Rate Maturity Date
$ 15,465 2.60 % March 15, 2024
$ 14,433 2.60 % March 30, 2024
$ 18,558 2.64 % March 15, 2026
$ 13,506 2.64 % March 17, 2026
For derivatives designated and that qualify as cash flow hedges of interest rate risk, the gain or loss on the derivative is recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income and subsequently reclassified into interest expense in the same period(s) during which the hedged transaction affects earnings. Amounts reported in accumulated other comprehensive income related to derivatives will be reclassified to interest expense as interest payments are paid on the Company’s variable-rate debt. During the next twelve months, the Company estimates that an additional $1.5 million will be reclassified as an increase to interest expense. Concurrently with the repayment of $200 million of variable-rate FHLB advances in the fourth quarter of 2020, the Company terminated two interest rate swaps with a notional value of $200.0 million. A loss of $3.2 million was recognized on the termination of the swaps.
Non-designated Hedges
Derivatives not designated as hedges are not considered speculative and result from a service the Company provides to certain customers. The Company executes interest rate swaps with commercial banking customers to facilitate their respective risk management strategies. Those interest rate swaps are simultaneously hedged by offsetting derivatives that the Company executes with a third party, such that the Company minimizes its net risk exposure resulting from such transactions. As the interest rate derivatives associated with this program do not meet the strict hedge accounting requirements, changes in the fair value of both the customer derivatives and the offsetting derivatives are recognized directly in earnings as a component of other noninterest income.
The table below presents the fair value of the Company’s derivative financial instruments as well as their classification on the Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019.
Notional Amount Derivative Assets Derivative Liabilities
($ in thousands) December 31, 2020 December 31, 2019 December 31, 2020 December 31, 2019 December 31, 2020 December 31, 2019
Derivatives Designated as Hedging Instruments
Interest rate swap $ 61,962 $ 61,962 $ - $ - $ 5,987 $ 2,872
Derivatives not Designated as Hedging Instruments
Interest rate swap $ 1,026,016 $ 749,819 $ 28,703 $ 11,055 $ 28,980 $ 11,875
The table below presents a gross presentation, the effects of offsetting, and a net presentation of the Company’s financial instruments that are subject to offsetting as of December 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019. The gross amounts of assets or liabilities can be reconciled to the tabular disclosure of fair value. The tabular disclosure of fair value provides the location that financial assets and liabilities are presented on the Balance Sheet.
As of December 31, 2020
Gross Amounts Not Offset in the Statement of Financial Position
($ in thousands)
Gross Amounts Recognized Gross Amounts Offset in the Statement of Financial Position Net Amounts of Assets presented in the Statement of Financial Position Financial Instruments Fair Value Collateral Posted Net Amount
Assets:
Interest rate swap $ 28,703 $ - $ 28,703 $ 2 $ - $ 28,701
Liabilities:
Interest rate swap $ 34,967 $ - $ 34,967 $ 2 $ 34,903 $ 62
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase 271,081 - 271,081 - 271,081 -
As of December 31, 2019
Gross Amounts Not Offset in the Statement of Financial Position
($ in thousands)
Gross Amounts Recognized Gross Amounts Offset in the Statement of Financial Position Net Amounts of Assets presented in the Statement of Financial Position Financial Instruments Fair Value Collateral Posted Net Amount
Assets:
Interest rate swap $ 11,055 $ - $ 11,055 $ 56 $ - $ 10,999
Liabilities:
Interest rate swap $ 14,747 $ - $ 14,747 $ 56 $ 14,573 $ 118
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase 230,886 - 230,886 - 230,886 -
As of December 31, 2020, the fair value of derivatives in a net liability position, which includes accrued interest but excludes any adjustment for nonperformance risk, related to these agreements was $35.8 million. Further, the Company has minimum collateral posting thresholds with certain of its derivative counterparties and has posted collateral of $36.5 million.
NOTE 8 - FIXED ASSETS
A summary of fixed assets at December 31, 2020 and 2019, is as follows:
December 31,
($ in thousands) 2020 2019
Land $ 13,389 $ 14,079
Buildings and leasehold improvements 53,007 54,838
Furniture, fixtures and equipment 16,560 15,178
Capitalized software 1,373 1,373
84,329 85,468
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization 31,160 25,455
Total fixed assets $ 53,169 $ 60,013
Depreciation and amortization of fixed assets included in noninterest expense amounted to $6.2 million, $5.7 million, and $3.5 million in 2020, 2019, and 2018, respectively.
NOTE 9 - GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS
The table below presents a summary of goodwill:
($ in thousands) Years ended December 31,
2020 2019
Goodwill, beginning of year $ 210,344 $ 117,345
Additions from acquisition 50,223 92,999
Goodwill, end of year $ 260,567 $ 210,344
The table below presents a summary of intangible assets:
($ in thousands) Years ended December 31,
2020 2019
Core deposit intangible, net, beginning of year $ 26,076 $ 8,553
Additions from acquisition 2,681 23,066
Amortization (5,673) (5,543)
Core deposit intangible, net, end of year $ 23,084 $ 26,076
Amortization expense on the core deposit intangibles was $5.7 million, $5.5 million, and $2.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018, respectively. The core deposit intangibles are being amortized over a 10-year period.
The following table reflects the amortization schedule for the core deposit intangible at December 31, 2020.
Year Core Deposit Intangible ($ in thousands)
2021 $ 5,295
2022 4,517
2023 3,840
2024 3,162
2025 2,485
After 2025 3,785
$ 23,084
NOTE 10 - DEPOSITS
Following is a summary of certificates of deposit maturities at December 31, 2020:
($ in thousands) Brokered Customer Total
Less than 1 year $ - $ 384,529 $ 384,529
Greater than 1 year and less than 2 years - 75,484 75,484
Greater than 2 years and less than 3 years 25,069 12,663 37,732
Greater than 3 years and less than 4 years 25,140 17,587 42,727
Greater than 4 years and less than 5 years - 4,043 4,043
Greater than 5 years - 5,580 5,580
$ 50,209 $ 499,886 $ 550,095
Certificates of deposit balances over the FDIC insurance limit of $250,000 were $169.5 million as of December 31, 2020.
Following is a summary of activity for the year ended December 31, 2020, for deposit accounts of executive officers and directors, or to entities in which such individuals had beneficial interests as a shareholder, officer, or director.
($ in thousands) December 31, 2020
Balance at beginning of year $ 9,763
Deposits 2,441
Withdrawals (4,961)
Balance at end of year $ 7,243
The Company is a participant in the Promontory Interfinancial Network, a network that offers deposit placement services such as CDARS and ICS, which offer products that qualify large deposits for FDIC insurance. At December 31, 2020, the Company had $7.3 million of CDARS deposits and $71.7 million of ICS deposits. At December 31, 2020 and 2019, overdraft deposits of $1.0 million and $2.1 million, respectively, were reclassified to loans.
NOTE 11 - SUBORDINATED DEBENTURES
The amounts and terms of each issuance of the Company’s subordinated debentures at December 31, 2020 and 2019 were as follows:
Amount Maturity Date Initial Call Date (1) Interest Rate
($ in thousands) 2020 2019
EFSC Clayco Statutory Trust I $ 3,196 $ 3,196 December 17, 2033 December 17, 2008 Floats @ 3MO LIBOR + 2.85%
EFSC Capital Trust II 5,155 5,155 June 17, 2034 June 17, 2009 Floats @ 3MO LIBOR + 2.65%
EFSC Statutory Trust III 11,341 11,341 December 15, 2034 December 15, 2009 Floats @ 3MO LIBOR + 1.97%
EFSC Clayco Statutory Trust II 4,124 4,124 September 15, 2035 September 15, 2010 Floats @ 3MO LIBOR + 1.83%
EFSC Statutory Trust IV 10,310 10,310 December 15, 2035 December 15, 2010 Floats @ 3MO LIBOR + 1.44%
EFSC Statutory Trust V 4,124 4,124 September 15, 2036 September 15, 2011 Floats @ 3MO LIBOR + 1.60%
EFSC Capital Trust VI 14,433 14,433 March 30, 2037 March 30, 2012 Floats @ 3MO LIBOR + 1.60%
EFSC Capital Trust VII 4,124 4,124 December 15, 2037 December 15, 2012 Floats @ 3MO LIBOR + 2.25%
JEFFCO Stat Trust I (2) 7,752 7,886 February 22, 2031 February 22, 2011 Fixed @ 10.20%
JEFFCO Stat Trust II (2) 4,443 4,388 March 17, 2034 March 17, 2009 Floats @ 3MO LIBOR + 2.75%
Trinity Capital Trust III (2) 5,272 5,206 September 8, 2034 September 8, 2009 Floats @ 3MO LIBOR + 2.70%
Trinity Capital Trust IV 10,310 10,302 November 23, 2035 August 23, 2010 Fixed @ 6.88%
Trinity Capital Trust V (2) 7,706 7,543 December 15, 2036 September 15, 2011 Floats @ 3MO LIBOR + 1.65%
Total junior subordinated debentures 92,290 92,132
5.75% Fixed-to-floating rate subordinated notes 63,250 - June 1, 2030 June 1, 2025 Fixed @ 5.75% until
June 1, 2025, then floats @ Benchmark rate (3 month term SOFR) + 5.66%
4.75% Fixed-to-floating rate subordinated notes 50,000 50,000 November 1, 2026 November 1, 2021 Fixed @ 4.75% until
November 1, 2021, then floats @ 3MO LIBOR + 3.387%
Debt issuance costs (1,903) (874)
Total fixed-to-floating rate subordinated notes 111,347 49,126
Total subordinated debentures and notes $ 203,637 $ 141,258
(1) Callable each quarter after initial call date.
(2) Purchase accounting adjustments are reflected in the balance and also impact the effective interest rate.
The Company has 13 unconsolidated statutory business trusts. These trusts issued preferred securities that were sold to third parties. The sole purpose of the trusts was to invest the proceeds in junior subordinated debentures of the Company that have terms identical to the trust preferred securities. The subordinated debentures, which are the sole assets of the trusts, are subordinate and junior in right of payment to all present and future senior and subordinated indebtedness and certain other financial conditions of the Company. The Company fully and unconditionally guarantees each trust’s securities obligations. Under current regulations, the trust preferred securities are included in tier 1 capital for regulatory capital purposes, subject to certain limitations.
The trust preferred securities are redeemable in whole or in part on or after their respective call dates. Mandatory redemption dates may be shortened if certain conditions are met. The securities are classified as subordinated debentures in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets. Interest on the subordinated debentures held by the trusts is recorded as interest expense in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations. The Company’s investment of $2.9 million at December 31, 2020, in these trusts is included in other investments in the consolidated balance sheets. The Company has fixed the interest rate on a portion of its junior subordinated debentures through a series of interest rate swaps. For further discussion of the interest rate swaps and the corresponding terms, see “Note 7 - Derivative Financial Instruments.”
On November 1, 2016, the Company issued $50 million of fixed-to-floating rate subordinated notes. The notes initially bear a fixed annual interest rate of 4.75%, with interest payable semiannually in arrears on May 1 and November 1 of each year, commencing May 1, 2017. Commencing November 1, 2021, the interest rate on the notes resets quarterly to the three-month LIBOR rate plus a spread of 338.7 basis points, payable quarterly in arrears. On or after November 1, 2021, the Company will have the option to redeem the notes, in whole or in part, at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the subordinated notes to be redeemed plus accrued interest, subject to applicable regulatory approval. The Company’s obligation to make payments of principal and interest on the notes is subordinate and junior in right of payment to all of its senior debt. Current regulatory guidance allows for this subordinated debt to be treated as tier 2 regulatory capital for the first five years of its term, subject to certain limitations, and then phased out of tier 2 capital pro rata over the next five years.
On May 21, 2020, EFSC issued $63.3 million of 5.75% fixed-to-floating rate subordinated notes due in 2030 in a public offering (the “2030 Notes”). From and including the date of issuance to, but excluding, June 1, 2025, the 2030 Notes will bear interest at a rate equal to 5.75% per annum, payable semiannually in arrears on each June 1 and December 1. From and including June 1, 2025 to, but excluding, the maturity date or the date of earlier redemption, the 2030 Notes will bear interest at a floating rate per annum equal to a benchmark rate (which is expected to be three-month term SOFR (as defined in the Indenture, dated May 21, 2020, between EFSC and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee, and subsequent First Supplemental Indenture)), plus 566.0 basis points, payable quarterly in arrears on March 1, June 1, September 1 and December 1 of each year, commencing on September 1, 2025. Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the event that the benchmark rate is less than zero, then the benchmark rate shall be deemed to be zero.
NOTE 12 - FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK ADVANCES
FHLB advances are collateralized by 1-4 family residential real estate loans, business loans, and certain commercial real estate loans. At December 31, 2020 and 2019, the carrying value of the loans pledged to the FHLB of Des Moines was $1.4 billion and $1.6 billion, respectively. The secured line of credit had availability of approximately $739.1 million at December 31, 2020.
The following table summarizes the type, maturity, and rate of the Company’s FHLB advances at December 31:
2020 2019
($ in thousands) Term Outstanding Balance Weighted Rate Outstanding Balance Weighted Rate
Non-amortizing fixed advance Less than 1 year $ - - % $ 170,000 1.73 %
Non-amortizing fixed advance Greater than 1 year 50,000 1.56 % 52,406 1.62 %
Total FHLB advances $ 50,000 1.56 % $ 222,406 1.70 %
In August 2019, the Company entered into agreements totaling $50 million for convertible advances with a weighted average rate of 1.56% that mature in 2024 and are currently puttable by the FHLB.
At December 31, 2020, the Company used $6.0 million of collateral value to secure confirming letters of credit for public unit deposits and industrial development bonds.
NOTE 13 - OTHER BORROWINGS AND NOTES PAYABLE
Securities Sold Under Agreement to Repurchase
The Company enters into sales of securities under agreements to repurchase. The agreements are transacted with deposit customers and are utilized as an overnight investment product. The amounts received under these agreements represent short-term borrowings and are reflected as a liability in the consolidated balance sheets. The securities underlying these agreements are included in investment securities in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The Company has no control over the market value of the securities, which fluctuates due to market conditions.
However, the Company is obligated to promptly transfer additional securities if the market value of the securities falls below the repurchase agreement price. The Company manages this risk by maintaining an unpledged securities portfolio that it believes is sufficient to cover a decline in the market value of the securities sold under agreements to repurchase.
A summary of securities sold under agreements to repurchase is as follows:
December 31,
($ in thousands) 2020 2019
Securities sold under agreement to repurchase $ 271,081 $ 230,886
Average balance during the year 206,338 169,179
Maximum balance outstanding at any month-end 271,081 230,886
Average interest rate during the year 0.23 % 0.69 %
Average interest rate at December 31 0.07 % 0.91 %
Federal Reserve Line
The Bank also has a line with the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis which provides additional liquidity to the Company. As of December 31, 2020, $0.9 billion was available under this line. This line is secured by a pledge of certain eligible loans aggregating $1.1 billion. There were no amounts drawn on the Federal Reserve line of credit as of December 31, 2020.
Federal Reserve PPPLF
The Company acquired $86.1 million of Federal Reserve PPPLF funds from the Seacoast acquisition which were subsequently paid off in November 2020.
Revolving Credit Line
In February 2016, the Company entered into a senior unsecured revolving credit agreement (the “Revolving Agreement”) with another bank. The Revolving Agreement has a one-year term, maturing on February 22, 2021. It is in process of renewal and allows for borrowings up to $25 million. The interest rate is the one-month LIBOR plus 125 basis points. The proceeds can be used for general corporate purposes. The Revolving Agreement is subject to ongoing compliance with a number of customary affirmative and negative covenants as well as specified financial covenants.
A summary of the amounts drawn on the Revolving Agreement is as follows:
December 31,
($ in thousands) 2019
Outstanding balance $ -
Average balance during the year 323
Maximum balance outstanding at any month-end 2,000
Weighted average interest rate during the year 4.61 %
Average interest rate at December 31 -
The revolving credit line was not accessed in 2020.
Term Loan
In February 2019, the Company entered into a five year, $40.0 million unsecured term loan agreement (the “Term Loan”) with another bank with the proceeds primarily used to fund the company’s cash portion of the acquisition of Trinity. The interest rate is the one-month LIBOR plus 125 basis points.
A summary of the Term Loan is as follows:
December 31,
($ in thousands) 2020 2019
Term Loan $ 30,000 $ 34,286
Average balance during the year 32,123 30,810
Maximum balance outstanding at any month-end 34,286 40,000
Weighted average interest rate during the year 1.96 % 3.55 %
Average interest rate at December 31 1.44 % 3.00 %
NOTE 14 - LITIGATION AND OTHER CONTINGENCIES
The Company and its subsidiaries are, from time to time, parties to various legal proceedings arising out of their businesses. Management believes there are no such legal proceedings pending or threatened against the Company or its subsidiaries in the ordinary course of business, directly, indirectly, or in the aggregate that, if determined adversely, would have a material adverse effect on the business, consolidated financial condition, results of operations or cash flows of the Company or any of its subsidiaries.
NOTE 15 - REGULATORY CAPITAL
Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require the Bank to maintain minimum ratios (set forth in the following table) of total, tier 1, and common equity tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets, and of tier 1 capital to average assets. Management believes, as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, that the Company met all capital adequacy requirements to which it is subject.
As of December 31, 2020 and 2019, the Bank was categorized as “well-capitalized” under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action. To be categorized as “well-capitalized” the Bank must maintain minimum total risk-based capital, tier 1 risk-based capital, common equity tier 1 risk-based capital, and tier 1 leverage ratios as set forth in the table. In addition, the Company must maintain an additional CCB above the regulatory minimum ratio requirements. The CCB is designed to insulate banks from periods of stress and impose constraints on dividends, share repurchases and discretionary bonus payments when capital levels fall below prescribed levels.
The capital ratios are presented in the table below:
December 31, 2020 December 31, 2019
EFSC Bank EFSC Bank To Be Well-Capitalized Minimum Ratio
with CCB
Common Equity Tier 1 Capital to Risk Weighted Assets 10.9 % 12.5 % 9.9 % 11.7 % 6.5 % 7.0 %
Tier 1 Capital to Risk Weighted Assets 12.1 % 12.5 % 11.4 % 11.7 % 8.0 % 8.5 %
Total Capital to Risk Weighted Assets 14.9 % 13.7 % 12.9 % 12.4 % 10.0 % 10.5 %
Leverage Ratio (Tier 1 Capital to Average Assets) 10.0 % 10.3 % 10.1 % 10.3 % 5.0 % 4.0 %
NOTE 16 - SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY AND COMPENSATION PLANS
Shareholders’ Equity
Common Stock
At December 31, 2020 and 2019, the Company has reserved the following shares of its authorized but unissued common stock for possible future issuance in connection with the following:
December 31, 2020 December 31, 2019
Outstanding performance units (maximum issuance) 125,176 73,172
Outstanding RSU’s 157,428 117,369
Outstanding options and appreciation rights - 28,300
2018 Stock Incentive Plan 339,691 521,573
Non-Management Director Plan 86,616 96,031
2018 Employee Stock Purchase Plan 635,890 694,085
Total 1,344,801 1,530,530
Common Stock Repurchase Plan
In May 2015, the Company’s board of directors authorized the repurchase of up to two million shares of the Company’s common stock. The repurchases may be made in open market or privately negotiated transactions and the stock repurchase program will remain in effect until fully utilized or until modified, superseded or terminated. At December 31, 2020, there were 95,907 shares available for repurchase under the plan.
Preferred Stock
The Company has 5,000,000 shares of authorized preferred stock with a par value of $0.01. The Board of Directors has the right to set for each series of preferred stock, subject to the laws of the State of Delaware, the dividend rate, conversion and redemption terms, voting rights and liquidation preferences, among others. At December 31, 2020 and 2019 there were no shares of preferred stock outstanding.
Dividends
The Company’s ability to pay dividends to its shareholders is generally dependent upon the payment of dividends by the Bank to the parent company. The Bank cannot pay dividends to the extent it would be deemed undercapitalized by the FDIC after making such dividend.
Dividends on the Company’s capital stock are prohibited under the terms of the junior subordinated debenture agreements, see “Note 11 - Subordinated Debentures,” if the Company is in continuous default on its payment obligations to the capital trusts, has elected to defer interest payments on the debentures or extends the interest payment period. At December 31, 2020, the Company was not in default on any of the junior subordinated debenture issuances.
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
The following table presents the changes in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) after-tax by component:
($ in thousands) Net Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Available-for-Sale Debt Securities Unamortized Gain (Loss) on Held-to-Maturity Securities Net Unrealized Loss on Cash Flow Hedges Total
Balance, December 31, 2017 $ (3,622) $ (196) $ - $ (3,818)
Net change (4,633) 3 - (4,630)
Adjustment for change in accounting policies (792) (42) - (834)
Balance, December 31, 2018 (9,047) (235) - (9,282)
Net change 29,226 (33) (2,162) 27,031
Transfer from available-for-sale to held-to-maturity (5,202) 5,202 - -
Balance, December 31, 2019 14,977 4,934 (2,162) 17,749
Net change 23,627 (1,910) (2,346) 19,371
Transfer from available-for-sale to held-to-maturity (16,284) 16,284 - -
Balance, December 31, 2020 $ 22,320 $ 19,308 $ (4,508) $ 37,120
The following table presents the pre-tax and after-tax changes in the components of other comprehensive income:
2020 2019 2018
($ in thousands) Pre-tax Tax effect After-tax Pre-tax Tax effect After-tax Pre-tax Tax effect After-tax
Change in unrealized gain (loss) on available-for-sale debt securities $ 31,798 $ 7,854 $ 23,944 $ 38,764 $ 9,575 $ 29,189 $ (6,143) $ (1,517) $ (4,626)
Reclassification adjustment for realized (gain) loss on sale of available-for-sale debt securities(a) (421) (104) (317) 49 12 37 (9) (2) (7)
Reclassification of (gain) loss on held-to-maturity securities(b) (2,537) (627) (1,910) (44) (11) (33) 4 1 3
Change in unrealized loss on cash flow hedges arising during the period(b) (7,898) (1,951) (5,947) (3,004) (742) (2,262) - - -
Reclassification of loss on cash flow hedges(b) 4,782 1,181 3,601 133 33 100 - - -
Total other comprehensive income (loss) $ 25,724 $ 6,353 $ 19,371 $ 35,898 $ 8,867 $ 27,031 $ (6,148) $ (1,518) $ (4,630)
(a)The pre-tax amount is reported in noninterest income/expense in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
(b)The pre-tax amount is reported in interest income/expense in the Consolidated Statements of Operations, except for a $3.2 million termination fee in 2020 recognized in noninterest expense.
Compensation Plans
The Company has adopted share-based compensation plans to reward and provide long-term incentive for directors and key employees of the Company including its subsidiaries. These plans provide for the granting of stock, stock options, stock-settled stock appreciation rights (“SSARs”), and restricted stock units (“RSUs”), and may contain performance terms as designated by the Company’s Board of Directors upon the recommendation of the Compensation Committee of the Board. The Company uses authorized and unissued shares to satisfy share award exercises.
The total excess income tax benefit for share-based compensation arrangements was $0.2 million, $0.5 million, and $1.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018, respectively. At December 31, 2020, there was $5.0 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested share-based compensation awards. The cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2 years.
The following table summarizes share-based compensation expense:
($ in thousands) 2020 2019 2018
Performance stock units $ 1,097 $ 1,699 $ 2,067
Restricted stock units 2,613 1,969 1,211
Employee stock purchase plan 468 364 174
Total share-based compensation expense $ 4,178 $ 4,032 $ 3,452
Performance Units
The Company has entered into long-term incentive agreements with certain key employees. These awards are conditioned on certain performance criteria and market criteria measured against a group of peer banks over a three-year period for each grant. The awards contain minimum (threshold), target, and maximum (exceptional) performance levels. In the event of a change in control, as defined in the plan, the awards will vest at a minimum of the target level. The amount of the awards is determined at the end of the three year vesting and performance period. In January 2021, the Company awarded 23,251 shares to employees upon completion of the 2018-2020 performance cycle. In January 2020, the Company awarded 62,649 shares to employees upon completion of the 2017-2019 performance cycle. In January 2019, the Company awarded 99,308 shares to employees upon completion of the 2016-2018 performance cycle.
Information related to the outstanding grants at December 31, 2020 is shown below:
($ in thousands) 2019 - 2021 Cycle 2020 - 2022 Cycle
Shares issuable at target 20,860 26,002
Maximum shares issuable 41,720 52,004
Unrecognized compensation cost $ 366 $ 704
Weighted average grant date fair value 47.46 38.09
Restricted Stock Units
The Company awards nonvested stock, in the form of RSUs to employees. RSUs generally are subject to continued employment and generally vest ratably over two to five years. Shares issued to the Bank’s directors for compensation are not subject to vesting requirements. Vesting is accelerated upon a change in control or the employee meeting certain retirement criteria. RSUs do not carry voting or dividend rights until vested. Sales of the units are restricted prior to vesting. Various information related to the RSUs is shown below.
($ in thousands) 2020 2019 2018
Total fair value at vesting date $ 1,702 $ 1,067 $ 1,544
Total unrecognized compensation cost for nonvested stock units 3,899 3,417 2,175
Expected years to recognize unearned compensation 1.9 years 1.9 years 2.0 years
A summary of the status of the Company’s RSU awards as of December 31, 2020 and changes during the year then ended is presented below
Shares Weighted Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
Outstanding at December 31, 2019 117,369 $ 45.86
Granted 88,759 39.63
Vested (44,351) 45.68
Forfeited (4,349) 44.24
Outstanding at December 31, 2020 157,428 $ 42.44
Employee Stock Options and Stock-settled Stock Appreciation Rights
In determining compensation cost for stock options and SSARs, the Black-Scholes option-pricing model is used to estimate the fair value on date of grant. There were no grants of employee stock options or SSARs during the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, or 2018.
Stock options have been granted to key employees with exercise prices equal to the market price of the Company’s common stock at the date of grant and 10-year contractual terms. Stock options have a vesting schedule of three to five years. The SSARs are subject to continued employment, have a 10-year contractual term and vest ratably over five years. Neither stock options nor SSARs carry voting or dividend rights until exercised. At December 31, 2020, there was no remaining unrecognized compensation expense related to stock options and SSARs and all outstanding awards are vested. Various information related to the stock options and SSARs is shown below.
($ in thousands) 2020 2019 2018
Intrinsic value of option/SSAR exercises on date of exercise $ 597 $ 407 $ 2,469
Following is a summary of the SSAR activity for 2020.
($ in thousands, except per share data) Shares Weighted
Average
Exercise Price
Outstanding at December 31, 2019 28,300 $ 10.14
Exercised (28,300) 10.14
Outstanding at December 31, 2020 - N/A
Employee Stock Purchase Plan
The Company adopted an Employee Stock Purchase Plan (“ESPP”) in 2018 to provide its eligible employees with an opportunity to purchase common stock through accumulated contributions. The ESPP provides for shares to be
purchased at 85% of the lesser of the stock price at the enrollment date or the exercise date. The maximum number of shares of common stock available for sale under the ESPP is 750,000. In 2020, 2019, and 2018, employees purchased 58,195, 41,116, and 14,799 shares, respectively.
Stock Plan for Non-Management Directors
The Company has adopted a Stock Plan for Non-Management Directors, which provides for issuing up to 200,000 shares of common stock to non-management directors as compensation in lieu of cash. At December 31, 2020, there were 80,130 shares of stock available for grant under the Stock Plan for Non-Management Directors, exclusive of 6,486 shares to be issued upon deferral release.
Various information related to the Director Plan is shown below.
2020 2019 2018
Shares granted 15,901 11,382 11,750
Weighted average fair value $ 30.28 $ 41.63 $ 50.74
401(k) Plan
The Company has a 401(k) savings plan which covers substantially all full-time employees over the age of 21 and matches 100% of the first 6% of employee contributions. The amount charged to expense for the Company’s contributions to the plan was $3.8 million, $3.2 million and $2.8 million for 2020, 2019, and 2018, respectively.
Deferred Compensation Plan
The Company’s Deferred Compensation Plan permits certain executives to participate and defer up to 25% of their base salary and/or up to 100% of their eligible bonus for a plan year. Participants make an irrevocable election when they elect to participate for a plan year to receive the vested account balance following their retirement date, or at a future date not less than five years after the beginning of the plan year. At December 31, 2020, the Company had assets and liabilities of $3.6 million and $4.9 million, respectively, related to the Deferred Compensation Plan.
NOTE 17 - INCOME TAXES
The components of income tax expense for the years ended December 31, are as follows:
Year ended December 31,
($ in thousands) 2020 2019 2018
Current:
Federal $ 25,132 $ 15,470 $ 9,621
State and local 5,009 2,027 2,432
Total current 30,141 17,497 12,053
Deferred:
Federal (10,651) 4,262 2,812
State and local (1,927) 1,538 495
Total deferred (12,578) 5,800 3,307
Total income tax expense $ 17,563 $ 23,297 $ 15,360
A reconciliation of expected income tax expense, computed by applying the statutory federal income tax rate in 2020, 2019, and 2018 to income before income taxes and the amounts reflected in the consolidated statements of operations is as follows:
Year ended December 31,
($ in thousands) 2020 2019 2018
Income tax expense at statutory rate $ 19,309 $ 24,368 $ 21,961
Increase (reduction) in income tax resulting from:
Tax-exempt interest income, net (2,010) (962) (506)
State and local income taxes, net 3,254 2,816 2,423
Bank-owned life insurance, net (778) (628) (452)
Non-deductible expenses 637 749 294
Tax benefit (expense) of LIHTC investments, net (444) (278) (50)
Excess tax benefits (175) (526) (1,631)
Federal tax credits (1,327) (913) (4,627)
Subsidiary dividend timing election - - (2,728)
Non-taxable donation to charitable foundation - (420) -
Other, net (903) (909) 676
Total income tax expense $ 17,563 $ 23,297 $ 15,360
The net amount recognized as a component of tax expense for tax credits, other tax benefits, and amortization from low-income housing tax credit (“LIHTC”) investments recognized per the table above was $0.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2020. The net amount recognized as a benefit component of income tax expense per the table above was $0.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2019, and $0.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2018. As of December 31, 2020 and 2019, the carrying value of the investments related to low-income housing tax credits was $4.2 million and $4.0 million, respectively. No impairment losses have been recognized from forfeiture or ineligibility of tax credits or other circumstances during the life of any of the investments.
A net deferred income tax asset of $29.8 million and $14.4 million is included in other assets in the consolidated balance sheets at December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively. The tax effect of temporary differences that gave rise to significant portions of the deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities is as follows:
Year ended December 31,
($ in thousands) 2020 2019
Deferred tax assets:
Allowance for loan losses $ 34,031 $ 10,692
Acquired loans - 9,722
Loans held-for-sale 8,058 -
Other real estate 896 657
Deferred compensation 2,585 2,462
Accrued compensation 5,391 1,607
Net operating losses and tax credits 6,460 7,066
Other deferred tax assets 3,086 791
Total deferred tax assets 60,507 32,997
Deferred tax liabilities:
Acquired loans 3,413 -
Unrealized gains on securities 12,189 5,847
Intangible assets 7,800 7,432
Other deferred tax liabilities 4,369 2,407
Total deferred tax liabilities 27,771 15,686
Net deferred tax asset before valuation allowance 32,736 17,311
Less: valuation allowance 2,932 2,932
Net deferred tax asset $ 29,804 $ 14,379
As part of the Trinity Capital Corporation acquisition in 2019, the company acquired net operating loss, tax credit, and capital loss deferred tax assets. Net operating losses originated in the years 2012, 2014-2017, and 2019 and will expire in the years between 2032-2037. Tax credit carryforwards originated in years 2010-2015 and will expire in the years between 2030-3035. Capital losses originated in 2015, 2016, & 2018 and will expire in the years between 2021-2023.
A valuation allowance is provided on deferred tax assets when it is more likely than not that some portion of the assets will not be realized. In 2019, as part of the Trinity Capital Corporation acquisition, the company acquired net operating loss, tax credit, and capital loss deferred tax assets. The company determined that it was more likely than not that some of the assets would not be realized. As such, the company recorded a $2.9 million valuation allowance as of December 31, 2020 and 2019.
The Company and its subsidiaries file income tax returns in the federal jurisdiction and in twenty-nine states. The Company is no longer subject to federal, state or local income tax audits by tax authorities for years before 2017, with the exception of 2016 being an open year by one state taxing authority. Net operating losses generated prior to 2016 that are utilized going forward would still be subject to examination.
As of December 31, 2020, the gross amount of unrecognized tax benefits was $3.2 million and the total amount of net unrecognized tax benefits that would impact the effective tax rate, if recognized, was $3.1 million. As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, the total amount of the net unrecognized tax benefits that would impact the effective tax rate, if recognized, was $1.1 million and $0.9 million, respectively. The Company believes it is reasonably possible that the gross amount of unrecognized benefits will be reduced by approximately $0.3 million as a result of a lapse of statute of limitations in the next 12 months.
The Company recognizes interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions in income tax expense and classifies such interest and penalties in the liability for unrecognized tax benefits. The amount accrued for interest and penalties was $0.9 million as of December 31, 2020, and was not significant for 2019 and 2018.
The activity in the gross liability for unrecognized tax benefits was as follows:
($ in thousands) 2020 2019 2018
Balance at beginning of year $ 1,497 $ 1,301 $ 1,244
Additions based on tax positions related to the current year 395 401 367
Additions for tax positions of prior years 1,556 62 50
Settlements or lapse of statute of limitations (291) (267) (360)
Balance at end of year $ 3,157 $ 1,497 $ 1,301
NOTE 18 - COMMITMENTS
Long-term Lease Commitments
See “Note 6 - Leases” in this report for information regarding the Company’s long-term lease commitments.
Off-balance-Sheet Commitments
The Company issues financial instruments in the normal course of the business of meeting the financing needs of its customers. These financial instruments include commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit. These instruments may involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest rate risk in excess of the amounts recognized in the consolidated balance sheets.
The Company’s extent of involvement and maximum potential exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the other party to the financial instrument for commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit is not more than the contractual amount of these instruments.
The Company uses the same credit policies in making commitments and conditional obligations as it does for financial instruments included on its consolidated balance sheets.
The contractual amounts of off-balance-sheet financial instruments as of December 31, 2020, and December 31, 2019, are as follows:
(in thousands) December 31, 2020 December 31, 2019
Commitments to extend credit $ 1,946,068 $ 1,469,413
Letters of credit 50,971 47,969
State tax credits 24,473 28,035
Low-income housing tax credits - 704
Limited partnership commitments 23,400 20,829
There was an insignificant amount of unadvanced commitments on impaired loans at December 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019. Other liabilities include approximately $5.7 million for estimated losses attributable to unadvanced commitments at December 31, 2020.
Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Commitments usually have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses, may have significant usage restrictions, and may require payment of a fee. Of the total commitments to extend credit at December 31, 2020, and December 31, 2019, $160.6 million and $144.8 million, respectively, represent fixed rate loan commitments. Since certain of the commitments may expire without being drawn upon or may be revoked, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash obligations. The Company evaluates each
customer’s credit worthiness on a case-by-case basis. The amount of collateral obtained, if deemed necessary by the Company upon extension of credit, is based on management’s credit evaluation of the borrower. Collateral held varies, but may include accounts receivable, inventory, premises and equipment, and real estate.
Letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by the Company to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. These letters of credit are issued to support contractual obligations of the Company’s customers. The credit risk involved in issuing letters of credit is essentially the same as the risk involved in extending loans to customers. The approximate remaining term of letters of credit range from 1 month to 4 years at December 31, 2020.
The Company also has off-balance sheet commitments for purchases of state tax credits, low-income housing tax credits, and commitments for various capital raises for SBICs.
NOTE 19 - FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
The fair value of an asset or liability is the exchange price that would be received to sell that asset or paid to transfer that liability in an orderly transaction occurring in the principal market (or most advantageous market in the absence of a principal market) for such asset or liability. Inputs to valuation techniques include the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability. ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, establishes a fair value hierarchy for valuation inputs that gives the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs. The fair value hierarchy is as follows:
•Level 1 Inputs - Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the reporting entity has the ability to access at the measurement date.
•Level 2 Inputs - Inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. These might include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability (such as interest rates, volatilities, prepayment speeds, credit risks, etc.) or inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by market data by correlation or other means.
•Level 3 Inputs - Unobservable inputs for determining the fair values of assets or liabilities that reflect an entity’s own assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the assets or liabilities.
Fair value on a recurring basis
The following table summarizes financial instruments measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, segregated by the level of the valuation inputs within the fair value hierarchy utilized to measure fair value.
December 31, 2020
($ in thousands) Quoted Prices in
Active Markets
for Identical Assets
(Level 1) Significant
Other
Observable Inputs
(Level 2) Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3) Total Fair
Value
Assets
Securities available-for-sale
Obligations of U.S. Government-sponsored enterprises $ - $ 15,161 $ - $ 15,161
Obligations of states and political subdivisions - 344,232 - 344,232
Residential mortgage-backed securities - 526,572 - 526,572
Corporate debt securities - 14,998 - 14,998
U.S. Treasury Bills - 11,466 - 11,466
Total securities available-for-sale - 912,429 - 912,429
Derivative financial instruments - 28,703 - 28,703
Total assets $ - $ 941,132 $ - $ 941,132
Liabilities
Derivative financial instruments $ - $ 34,967 $ - $ 34,967
Total liabilities $ - $ 34,967 $ - $ 34,967
December 31, 2019
($ in thousands) Quoted Prices in
Active Markets
for Identical Assets
(Level 1) Significant
Other
Observable Inputs
(Level 2) Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3) Total Fair
Value
Assets
Securities available-for-sale
Obligations of U.S. Government-sponsored enterprises $ - $ 10,046 $ - $ 10,046
Obligations of states and political subdivisions - 213,024 - 213,024
Residential mortgage-backed securities - 902,021 - 902,021
U.S. Treasury Bills - 10,226 - 10,226
Total securities available-for-sale - 1,135,317 - 1,135,317
Other investments - - - -
Derivative financial instruments - 11,055 - 11,055
Total assets $ - $ 1,146,372 $ - $ 1,146,372
Liabilities
Derivative financial instruments $ - $ 14,747 $ - $ 14,747
Total liabilities $ - $ 14,747 $ - $ 14,747
•Securities available-for-sale. Securities classified as available-for-sale are reported at fair value utilizing Level 2 and Level 3 inputs. Fair values for Level 2 securities are based upon dealer quotes, market spreads, the U.S. Treasury yield curve, trade execution data, market consensus prepayment speeds, credit information and the bond’s terms and conditions at the security level. Changes in fair value are recognized through accumulated other comprehensive income.
•Derivatives. Derivatives are reported at fair value utilizing Level 2 inputs. The Company obtains counterparty quotations to value its interest rate swaps and caps. In addition, the Company validates the counterparty quotations with third party valuation sources. Derivatives with negative fair values are
included in Other liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets. Derivatives with positive fair value are included in Other assets in the consolidated balance sheets. Changes in the fair value of client-related derivative instruments are recognized through net income. For the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, the gains and losses offset each other due to the Company’s hedging of the client swaps with other bank counterparties.
Fair value on a non-recurring basis
Certain financial assets and financial liabilities are measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis; that is, the instruments are not measured at fair value on an ongoing basis but are subject to fair value adjustments in certain circumstances (for example, when there is evidence of impairment).
•Impaired loans. Impaired loans are included as Portfolio loans on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets with amounts specifically reserved for credit impairment in the Allowance for loan losses. On a quarterly basis, fair value adjustments are recorded on impaired loans to account for (1) partial write-downs that are based on the current appraised or market-quoted value of the underlying collateral or (2) the full charge-off of the loan carrying value. In some cases, the properties for which market quotes or appraised values have been obtained are located in areas where comparable sales data is limited, outdated, or unavailable. In addition, the Company may adjust the valuations based on other relevant market conditions or information. Accordingly, fair value estimates, including those obtained from real estate brokers or other third-party consultants, for collateral-dependent impaired loans are classified in Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy.
•Other Real Estate. These assets are reported at the lower of the loan carrying amount at foreclosure or fair value. Fair value is based on third party appraisals of each property and the Company’s judgment of other relevant market conditions. These are considered Level 3 inputs.
The following table presents financial instruments and non-financial assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis as of December 31, 2020 and 2019.
December 31, 2020
(1) (1) (1) (1)
($ in thousands) Total Fair Value Quoted Prices in Active
Markets for
Identical
Assets
(Level 1) Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2) Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3) Total losses for the year ended
December 31, 2020
Impaired loans $ 1,247 $ - $ - $ 1,247 $ 4,486
Other real estate 3,600 - - 3,600 1,000
Total $ 4,847 $ - $ - $ 4,847 $ 5,486
December 31, 2019
(1) (1) (1) (1)
($ in thousands) Total Fair Value Quoted Prices in Active
Markets for
Identical
Assets
(Level 1) Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2) Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3) Total losses for the year ended
December 31, 2019
Impaired loans $ 2,506 $ - $ - $ 2,506 $ 2,687
Total $ 7,450 $ - $ - $ 7,450 $ 2,687
(1) The amounts represent balances measured at fair value during the period and still held as of the reporting date.
Impaired loans are reported at the fair value of the underlying collateral. Fair values for impaired loans are obtained from current appraisals by qualified licensed appraisers or independent valuation specialists. Other real estate owned is adjusted to fair value upon foreclosure of the underlying loan. Subsequently, foreclosed assets are carried
at the lower of carrying value or fair value less costs to sell. Fair value of other real estate is based upon the current appraised values of the properties as determined by qualified licensed appraisers and the Company’s judgment of other relevant market conditions.
Carrying amount and fair value at December 31, 2020 and 2019
Following is a summary of the carrying amounts and fair values of the Company’s financial instruments on the consolidated balance sheets at December 31, 2020 and 2019. This summary excludes certain financial assets and liabilities for which carrying value approximates fair value and financial instruments that are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis disclosed above. Financial instruments for which carrying values approximate fair value include cash and due from banks, federal funds sold, interest bearing deposits, accrued interest receivable/payable, demand, savings and money market deposits.
December 31, 2020 December 31, 2019
($ in thousands) Carrying Amount Estimated fair value Level Carrying Amount Estimated fair value Level
Balance sheet assets
Securities held-to-maturity $ 487,610 $ 501,523 Level 2 $ 181,166 $ 181,939 Level 2
Other investments 48,764 48,764 Level 2 38,044 38,044 Level 2
Loans held-for-sale 13,564 13,564 Level 2 5,570 5,570 Level 2
Loans, net 7,088,264 7,067,562 Level 3 5,271,049 5,205,651 Level 3
State tax credits, held-for-sale 36,853 39,925 Level 3 36,802 39,046 Level 3
Balance sheet liabilities
Certificates of deposit $ 550,095 $ 553,946 Level 3 $ 826,447 $ 825,203 Level 3
Subordinated debentures and notes 203,637 192,889 Level 2 141,258 130,985 Level 2
FHLB advances 50,000 51,871 Level 2 222,406 221,402 Level 2
Other borrowings 301,081 301,081 Level 2 265,172 265,172 Level 2
Limitations
Fair value estimates are made at a specific point in time, based on relevant market information and information about the financial instrument. These estimates are subjective in nature and involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgment, and therefore, cannot be determined with precision. Such estimates include the valuation of loans, goodwill, intangible assets, and other long-lived assets, along with assumptions used in the calculation of income taxes, among others. These estimates and assumptions are based on management’s best estimates and judgment. Management evaluates its estimates and assumptions on an ongoing basis using experience and other factors, including the current economic environment, which management believes to be reasonable under the circumstances. We adjust such estimates and assumptions when facts and circumstances dictate. Decreasing real estate values, illiquid credit markets, volatile equity markets, and declines in consumer spending have combined to increase the uncertainty inherent in such estimates and assumptions. As future events and their effects cannot be determined with precision, actual results could differ significantly from these estimates. Changes in estimates resulting from continuing changes in the economic environment will be reflected in the financial statement in future periods. In addition, these estimates do not reflect any premium or discount that could result from offering for sale at one time the Company’s entire holdings of a particular financial instrument. Fair value estimates are based on existing on-balance and off-balance-sheet financial instruments without attempting to estimate the value of anticipated future business and the value of assets and liabilities that are not considered financial instruments. In addition, the tax ramifications related to the realization of the unrealized gains and losses can have a significant effect on fair value estimates and have not been considered in many of the estimates.
NOTE 20 - PARENT COMPANY ONLY CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Condensed Balance Sheets
December 31,
($ in thousands) 2020 2019
Assets
Cash $ 75,475 $ 21,955
Investment in Bank 1,200,689 977,959
Investment in nonbank subsidiaries 9,778 9,795
Other assets 35,108 37,905
Total assets $ 1,321,050 $ 1,047,614
Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity
Subordinated debentures and notes $ 203,637 $ 141,258
Notes payable 30,000 34,286
Accounts payable and other liabilities 8,439 4,885
Shareholders' equity 1,078,974 867,185
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity $ 1,321,050 $ 1,047,614
Condensed Statements of Operations
Year ended December 31,
($ in thousands) 2020 2019 2018
Income:
Dividends from Bank $ 37,000 $ 60,000 $ 30,000
Dividends from nonbank subsidiaries 1,400 1,500 1,200
Other 483 663 1,784
Total income 38,883 62,163 32,984
Expenses:
Interest expense-subordinated debentures and notes 9,885 7,507 5,798
Interest expense-notes payable 705 1,182 62
Other expenses 6,946 6,936 7,087
Total expenses 17,536 15,625 12,947
Income before taxes and equity in undistributed earnings of subsidiaries 21,347 46,538 20,037
Income tax benefit 3,448 3,478 3,482
Net income before equity in undistributed earnings of subsidiaries 24,795 50,016 23,519
Equity in undistributed earnings of subsidiaries 49,589 42,723 65,698
Net income and comprehensive income $ 74,384 $ 92,739 $ 89,217
Condensed Statements of Cash Flows
Year ended December 31,
($ in thousands) 2020 2019 2018
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income $ 74,384 $ 92,739 $ 89,217
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
Share-based compensation 4,178 4,032 3,452
Net income of subsidiaries (87,989) (104,223) (94,898)
Dividends from subsidiaries 38,400 61,500 31,200
Other, net 3,588 (1,063) (953)
Net cash provided by operating activities 32,561 52,985 28,018
Cash flows from investing activities:
Cash paid for acquisitions, net of cash acquired (1,243) (36,015) -
Purchases of other investments (1,166) (2,634) (2,729)
Proceeds from distributions on other investments 765 1,271 1,911
Net cash used in investing activities (1,644) (37,378) (818)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from issuance of subordinated notes 61,953 - -
Proceeds from notes payable - 1,000 2,000
Repayments of notes payable - (3,000) -
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt - 40,000 -
Repayment of long-term debt (4,286) (5,714) -
Cash dividends paid (19,795) (16,569) (10,845)
Payments for the repurchase of common stock (15,347) (15,526) (19,387)
Payments for the issuance of equity instruments, net 78 (212) (2,576)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities 22,603 (21) (30,808)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents 53,520 15,586 (3,608)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year 21,955 6,369 9,977
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year $ 75,475 $ 21,955 $ 6,369
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
Noncash transactions:
Common shares issued in connection with acquisitions $ 167,035 $ 171,885 $ -
NOTE 21 - QUARTERLY CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION (Unaudited)
The following table presents unaudited quarterly financial information for the periods indicated:
($ in thousands, except per share data) 4th
Quarter 3rd
Quarter 2nd
Quarter 1st
Quarter
Interest income $ 84,113 $ 70,787 $ 73,191 $ 76,688
Interest expense 6,667 7,433 7,358 13,320
Net interest income 77,446 63,354 65,833 63,368
Provision for credit losses 9,463 14,080 19,591 22,264
Net interest income after provision for loan losses 67,983 49,274 46,242 41,104
Noninterest income 18,506 12,629 9,960 13,408
Noninterest expense 51,050 39,524 37,912 38,673
Income before income tax expense 35,439 22,379 18,290 15,839
Income tax expense 6,508 4,428 3,656 2,971
Net income $ 28,931 $ 17,951 $ 14,634 $ 12,868
Earnings per common share:
Basic $ 1.00 $ 0.68 $ 0.56 $ 0.49
Diluted 1.00 0.68 0.56 0.48
($ in thousands, except per share data) 4th
Quarter 3rd
Quarter 2nd
Quarter 1st
Quarter
Interest income $ 77,238 $ 81,078 $ 79,201 $ 67,617
Interest expense 15,625 18,032 17,486 15,274
Net interest income 61,613 63,046 61,715 52,343
Provision for credit losses 1,341 1,833 1,722 1,476
Net interest income after provision for loan losses 60,272 61,213 59,993 50,867
Noninterest income 14,418 13,564 11,964 9,230
Noninterest expense 38,354 38,239 49,054 39,838
Income before income tax expense 36,336 36,538 22,903 20,259
Income tax expense 7,246 7,469 4,479 4,103
Net income $ 29,090 $ 29,069 $ 18,424 $ 16,156
Earnings per common share:
Basic $ 1.10 $ 1.09 $ 0.69 $ 0.68
Diluted 1.09 1.08 0.68 0.67

---

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS
ITEM 9: CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.

---

ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
ITEM 9A: CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the “Act”) as of December 31, 2020. Based upon this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer have concluded that as of December 31, 2020, such disclosure controls and procedures were effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports it files or submits under the Act is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management (including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer) to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure, and is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms.
Management’s Assessment of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Management of the Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) and 15(d)-15(f) under the Act). The Company’s internal control system is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance to the Company’s management and Board of Directors regarding the preparation and fair presentation of published financial statements.
As permitted, management excluded from its assessment the operations of Seacoast Commerce Banc Holdings, which was acquired on November 12, 2020. As described in Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, assets acquired and excluded from management's assessment of internal control over financial reporting comprised approximately 13% and 11% of consolidated total and net assets, respectively, at December 31, 2020. Operations of Seacoast Commerce Banc Holdings comprised approximately 3% of revenues, for the year ended December 31, 2020.
The Company’s internal control over financial reporting includes policies and procedures that pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect transactions and dispositions of assets; provide reasonable assurances that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, and that receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and the directors of the Company; and provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or untimely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the Company’s assets that could have a material effect on the Company’s financial statements.
All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial reporting. Further, because of changes in conditions, the effectiveness of any system of internal control may vary over time. The design of any internal control system also factors in resource constraints and consideration for the benefit of the control relative to the cost of implementing the control. Because of these inherent limitations in any system of internal control, management cannot provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud within the Company have been detected.
Management assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2020. In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Management has concluded that the Company maintained an effective system of internal control over financial reporting based on these criteria as of December 31, 2020.
The Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, Deloitte & Touche LLP, who audited the consolidated financial statements, has issued an audit report on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2020, and it is included herein.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There have been no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Act) that occurred during the Company’s quarter ended December 31, 2020 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

---

ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 9B: OTHER INFORMATION
None.
PART III

---

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
ITEM 10: DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference to the Board and Committee Information and Executive Officer sections of the Company’s Proxy Statement for its 2021 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, which will be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Governance:
The Company has adopted a Code of Ethics applicable to all of its directors and employees, including the principal executive officer, principal financial officer and principal accounting officer. A copy of the Code of Ethics is available on the Company’s website at www.enterprisebank.com.

---

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
ITEM 11: EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference to the Executive Compensation section of the Company’s Proxy Statement for its 2021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which will be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

---

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS
ITEM 12: SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
The following table provides information regarding the securities authorized for issuance under our equity compensation plans as of December 31, 2020. Additional information regarding these plans is included in “Item 8. Note 16 - Shareholders’ Equity and Compensation Plans” in this report.
EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION
Plan Category Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights (a) Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights (b) Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (c)
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders 289,090 NA 1,055,711
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders - - -
Total 289,090 NA 1,055,711
(a) Includes the following:
•151,855 shares of common stock to be issued upon vesting of outstanding restricted stock units under the 2018 Stock Incentive Plan;
•125,176 shares of common stock to be issued upon vesting of outstanding performance units under the 2018 Stock Incentive Plan; and
•12,059 shares of common stock to be issued upon deferral release of common stock under the 2018 Stock Incentive Plan and the Non-Management Director Stock Plan.
(c) Includes the following:
•339,691 shares of common stock available for issuance under the 2018 Stock Incentive Plan;
•80,130 shares of common stock available for issuance under the Non-Management Director Stock Plan; and
•635,890 shares of common stock available for issuance under the 2018 Employee Stock Purchase Plan.
Additional information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference to the Information Regarding Beneficial Ownership section of the Company’s Proxy Statement for its 2021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which will be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

---

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
ITEM 13: CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference to the Related Person Transactions section of the Company’s Proxy Statement for its 2021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which will be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

---

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES
ITEM 14: PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES
The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to the Fees Paid to Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm section of the Company’s Proxy Statement for its 2021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which will be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
PART IV

---

ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
ITEM 15: EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
(a) 1. Financial Statements
The consolidated financial statements of Enterprise Financial Services Corp and its subsidiaries and independent auditors’ reports are included in Part II, Item 8, of this Form 10-K.
2. Financial Statement Schedules
All financial statement schedules have been omitted, as they are either inapplicable or included in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
3. Exhibits
No. Description
2.1 Agreement and Plan of Merger, among Enterprise Financial Services Corp, Enterprise Bank & Trust, Trinity Capital Corporation and Los Alamos National Bank, dated November 1, 2018 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 2, 2018 (File No. 001-15373)).
2.2 Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated August 20, 2020 by and among Enterprise Financial Services Corp, Enterprise Bank & Trust, Seacoast Commerce Banc Holdings and Seacoast Commerce Bank (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on August 21, 2020 (File No. 001-15373)).
3.1 Certificate of Incorporation of Registrant, (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed on December 16, 1996 (File No. 333-14737)).
3.2 Amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation of Registrant (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed on July 1, 1999 (File No. 333-82087)).
3.3 Amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation of Registrant (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 1999 (File No. 001-15373)).
3.4 Amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation of Registrant (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 99.2 to Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 30, 2002 (File No. 001-15373)).
3.5 Amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation of Registrant (incorporated herein by reference to Appendix A to Registrant's Proxy Statement on Form 14-A filed on November 20, 2008 (File No. 001-15373)).
3.6 Certificate of Designations of Registrant for Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series A, dated December 17, 2008 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 23, 2008 (File No. 001-15373)).
3.7 Amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation of Registrant (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2014 (File No. 001-15373)).
3.8 Amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation of Registrant (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.8 to Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on July 26, 2019 (File No. 001-15373)).
3.9 Amended and Restated Bylaws of Registrant (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 12, 2015 (File No. 001-15373)).
4.1 Description of Registrant’s Securities (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on February 22, 2020 (File No. 001-15373)).
4.2 Long-term borrowing instruments are omitted pursuant to Item 601(b)(4)(iii) of Regulation S-K. The Company undertakes to furnish copies of such instruments to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.
10.1.1* Executive Employment Agreement by and between Enterprise Financial Services Corp and James B. Lally, dated May 2, 2017 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of Registrant, filed with the Commission on June 6, 2017 (File No. 001-15373)).
10.1.2* Executive Employment Agreement dated September 13, 2013 by and between Enterprise Financial Services Corp and Keene S. Turner (incorporated by reference herein to Exhibit 10.1 to Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2013 (File No. 001-15373)), amended by that First Amendment of Executive Employment Agreement dated as of February 27, 2015 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1.7 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on February 27, 2015 (File No. 001-15373)), and amended by that Second Amendment to Executive Employment Agreement dated as of October 29, 2015 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1.2 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2015 (File No. 001-15373)).
10.1.3* Restricted Stock Unit Agreement dated as of December 7, 2018 by and between Registrant and Keene S. Turner (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1.15 to Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018 (File No. 001-15373)).
10.1.4* Executive Employment Agreement dated effective January 1, 2005 by and between Enterprise Financial Services Corp and Scott R. Goodman, amended by that First Amendment of Executive Employment Agreement dated as of December 31, 2008 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1.5 to Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on March 15, 2013 (File 001-15373)), and amended by that Second Amendment of Executive Employment Agreement dated October 11, 2013 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1.5 to Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on March 17, 2014 (File 001-15373)).
10.1.5* Amended and Restated Executive Employment Agreement dated as of October 24, 2019 by and between Enterprise Financial Services Corp and Douglas N. Bauche (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant, filed with the Commission on October 25, 2019 (File No. 001-15373)).
10.1.6* Executive Employment Agreement dated as of October 24, 2019 by and between Enterprise Financial Services Corp and Nicole M. Iannacone (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant, filed with the Commission on October 25, 2019 (File No. 001-15373)).
10.1.7* Executive Employment Agreement dated as of October 24, 2019 by and between Enterprise Financial Services Corp and Mark G. Ponder (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant, filed with the Commission on October 25, 2019 (File No. 001-15373)).
10.1.8* Enterprise Financial Services Corp Amended and Restated Deferred Compensation Plan I dated effective as of December 31, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to Registrant's Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 (File No. 001-15373)).
10.1.9* Enterprise Financial Services Corp, Stock Plan for Non-Management Directors (incorporated herein by reference to Registrant’s Proxy Statement on Schedule 14-A filed on March 7, 2006, as amended on Schedule 14A filed on April 23, 2012 (File No. 001-15373), and as amended on Schedule 14A filed on April 17, 2019 (File No. 001-15373)).
10.1.10* Enterprise Financial Services Corp, Annual Incentive Plan (incorporated herein by reference to Appendix C to Registrant's Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A, filed on March 7, 2006 and as amended on Schedule 14A filed on April 23, 2012 (File No. 001-15373)).
10.1.11* Enterprise Financial Services Corp. Amended and Restated 2018 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated herein by reference to Appendix A to Registrant’s Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A, filed on March 14, 2018 (File No. 001-15373)).
10.1.12* Enterprise Financial Services Corp. 2018 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (incorporated herein by reference to Appendix B to Registrant’s Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A, filed on March 14, 2018 (File No. 001-15373)).
10.1.13* Form of Enterprise Financial Services Corp LTIP Grant Agreement, pursuant to Amended and Restated 2018 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2018 (File No. 001-15373)).
10.1.14+ Form of Enterprise Financial Services Corp Stock Option Award Agreement, pursuant to Amended and Restated 2018 Stock Incentive Plan (filed herewith).
10.2 Form of Voting Agreements, dated November 1, 2018, between Enterprise Financial Services Corp and shareholders of Trinity Capital Corporation (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit A to Exhibit 2.1 to Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 2, 2018 (File No. 001-15373)).
10.3 Loan Agreement dated February 24, 2016 between US Bank National Association and Registrant (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015 (File No. 001-15373)), amended by the First Amendment to Loan Agreement dated as of February 23, 2017 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Registrant’s Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016 (File No. 001-15373)), amended by the Second Amendment to Loan agreement dated as of February 23, 2018 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Registrant’s Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017 (File No. 001-15373)),amended by the Third Amendment to Loan agreement dated as of February 22, 2019 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Registrant’s Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018 (File No. 001-15373)), and amended by the Fourth Amendment to Loan agreement dated as of February 22, 2020, (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on February 22, 2020 (File No. 001-15373)).
21.1+ Subsidiaries of Registrant.
23.1+ Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP.
24.1+ Power of Attorney.
31.1+ Chief Executive Officer’s Certification required by Rule 13(a)-14(a).
31.2+ Chief Financial Officer’s Certification required by Rule 13(a)-14(a).
32.1+ Chief Executive Officer Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to section § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.2+ Chief Financial Officer Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to section § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
101+ Pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T, the following financial information from the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2020, is formatted in Inline XBRL interactive data files: (i) Consolidated Balance Sheet at December 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019; (ii) Consolidated Statement of Income for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018; (iii) Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018; (iv) Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018; (v) Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018; and (vi) Notes to Financial Statements.
104+ The cover page of Enterprise Financial Services Corp’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020, formatted in Inline XBRL (contained in Exhibit 101).
* Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.
+ Filed herewith
Note: In accordance with Item 601(b)(4)(iii) of Regulation S-K, Registrant hereby agrees to furnish to the SEC, upon its request, a copy of any instrument that defines the rights of holders of each issue of long-term debt of Registrant and its consolidated subsidiaries for which consolidated and unconsolidated financial statements are required to be filed and that authorizes a total amount of securities not in excess of ten percent of the total assets of the Registrant on a consolidated basis.
(b) The exhibits not incorporated by reference herein are filed herewith.
(c) The financial statement schedules are either included in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements or omitted if inapplicable.