EDGAR 10-K Filing

Company CIK: 1286613
Filing Year: 2024
Filename: 1286613_10-K_2024_0001140361-24-011175.json

---

ITEM 1. BUSINESS
ITEM 1.
BUSINESS
Overview
Lincoln Educational Services Corporation and its subsidiaries (collectively, the “Company”, “we”, “our” and “us”, as applicable) provide diversified career-oriented post-secondary education to recent high school graduates and working adults. The Company, which currently operates 21 campuses, in 13 states has added two additional campuses, one located in East Point, Georgia and the other in Houston, Texas. As of December 31, 2023, these campuses were not operational however, the East Point, Georgia campus is expected to hold its first class in March of 2024 and the Houston, Texas campus is expected to become operational in the first quarter of 2026. Lincoln Educational Services Corporation offers
programs in skilled trades (which include HVAC, welding and computerized numerical control and electrical and electronic systems technology, among other programs), automotive technology, healthcare services (which include nursing, dental assistant and medical administrative assistant, among other programs) and hospitality services and information technology (which include culinary, therapeutic massage, cosmetology and aesthetics and information technology programs). The schools operate under Lincoln Technical Institute, Lincoln College of Technology, Lincoln Culinary Institute, and Euphoria Institute of Beauty Arts and Sciences and associated brand names. Most of the campuses serve major metropolitan markets and each typically offers courses in multiple areas of study. Five of the campuses are destination schools, which attract students from across the United States and, in some cases, from abroad. The Company’s other campuses primarily attract students from their local communities and surrounding areas. All of the campuses are nationally accredited and are eligible to participate in federal financial aid programs administered by the U.S. Department of Education (the “DOE”) and applicable state education agencies and accrediting commissions which allow students to apply for and access federal student loans as well as other forms of financial aid. The Company was incorporated in New Jersey in 2003 as the successor-in-interest to various acquired schools including Lincoln Technical Institute, Inc. which opened its first campus in Newark, New Jersey in 1946.
As of January 1, 2023, the Company’s business has been organized into two reportable business segments: (a) Campus Operations; and (b) Transitional. Based on trends in student demand and program expansion, there have been more cross-offerings of programs among the various campuses. Given this change, the Company has revised the way it manages the business, evaluates performance and allocates resources, resulting in an updated segment structure. The Campus Operations segment includes campuses that are in operation and contribute to the Company’s core operations and performance. The Transitional segment refers to campuses that are marked for closure and are currently being taught-out. In November, 2022, the Board of Directors approved a plan to close the Somerville, Massachusetts campus which has now been fully taught-out. As of December 31, 2023, the only campus classified in the Transitional segment is the Somerville, Massachusetts campus.
As of December 31, 2023, we had 13,270 students enrolled at 21 campuses. Our average enrollment for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023 was 12,941 students and our revenues were $378.1 million, which represented an increase of 8.6% over the prior fiscal year. For more information relating to our revenues, profits and financial condition, please refer to our Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
We believe that we provide our students with the highest quality career-oriented training available for our areas of study in our markets thereby serving students, local employers and their communities. The skills gap continues to expand as talent retires faster than new employees are hired and as the need for education and training increases in all careers with the accelerating pace of technological change.
We offer programs in areas of study that we believe are typically underserved by traditional providers of post-secondary education and for which we believe there exists significant demand among students and employers. Furthermore, we believe our convenient class scheduling, career-focused curricula and emphasis on job placement offer our students valuable advantages that have been previously unaddressed by the traditional academic sector. By combining virtual training with traditional classroom-based training led by experienced instructors, we believe we offer our students a unique opportunity to develop practical job skills in many of the key areas of expected job demand. We believe these job skills enable our students to compete effectively for employment opportunities and to pursue salary and career advancement.
In the last two years, we have further implemented our plan of improving the student experience by, among other things, further improving our campuses. In October 2023, the Company entered into a lease for approximately 100,000 square feet of space to serve as the Company’s new campus in Houston, Texas. The lease term commenced on January 2, 2024, with an initial lease term of 21 years and 6 months and three five-year renewal options. Also, in October 2023, the Company entered into a lease for approximately 120,000 square feet of space to serve as the Company’s new Nashville, Tennessee campus. The lease term commenced on November 1, 2023, with an initial lease term of 15 years and two five-year renewal options. In September 2023, the Company closed on the purchase of a 90,000 square foot property located at 311 Veterans Highway, Levittown, Pennsylvania for approximately $10.2 million and, subsequently on January 30, 2024 closed on a sale-leaseback transaction of this property. As of December 31, 2023, this property is classified as held-for-sale on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. In June, 2022, the Company executed a lease for approximately 55,000 square feet of space to serve as the Company’s new campus in East Point, Georgia. The lease term commenced in August 2022, with an initial lease term of 12 years and two five-year renewal options. For the year ended December 31, 2023, the Company incurred approximately $0.8 million in rent expenses. See Part II. Item 8. “Financial Statements and Supplemental Data - Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - Note 6 Leases and Note 8 Real Estate Transactions.”
Index
Business Strategy
We strive to strengthen our position as a leading provider of career-oriented post-secondary education by continuing to pursue the following strategy:
•
Increase Operating Efficiency. Our existing schools are a result of strategic acquisitions and expansion, and, while the programs may be very similar across the campuses, each campus operates on its own calendar. As we move most of our curriculum to a hybrid teaching model of virtual and traditional classroom-based in-person training, we are taking this opportunity to also standardize the programs and course calendars so that new students will begin on the same day across all campuses. In addition, we are removing certain functions from the campuses and centralizing them to remove distractions from the campuses while creating more efficient and effective services for our students. By simplifying, centralizing and standardizing our operations, we believe we will improve our margins and be more scalable. We are more than 50% through the transformation and expect to see improving margins by the second half of 2024.
•
Replicate Programs and Expand Existing Areas of Study. Whenever possible, we seek to replicate programs across our campuses. Adding proven in-demand programs to an existing campus enables that campus to further serve that market while increasing the operating efficiency at that campus. In addition, we believe we can leverage our operations to expand our program offerings in existing areas of study.
•
Maximize Utilization of Existing Facilities. We are focused on improving capacity utilization of existing facilities through increased enrollments, the introduction of new programs and partnerships with industry. In addition, we see opportunities to adjust our real estate needs with the advancement of our hybrid teaching model that we will continue to roll out over the next two years.
•
Expand Geographically. We plan to deploy our resources to strengthen our brand, invest in new programs and seek opportunities to expand our footprint into new markets. We have a solid portfolio of corporate and industry partners requesting that we explore new geographies to serve them better. Regardless of whether we expand our current campuses to take advantage of the operating leverage or establish new campuses, our goal is to remain competitive and prudently deploy our resources. Our expansion plans may be achieved organically through the opening of new campuses with existing resources or through acquisitions. We will be opening our first new campus in over a decade in the Atlanta market in the first half of 2024 and we have signed a lease for a second new campus in Houston that we expect to open by the first quarter of 2026.
•
Expand Teaching Platform. Using the lessons learned from the COVID-19 pandemic, we expect to continue to transform our in-person education model to a hybrid teaching model, which we call Lincoln 10.0. The Lincoln 10.0 model provides students with greater flexibility and convenience, which should help us attract more students. Moreover, we believe blended learning will create operating efficiencies that will enable us to contain tuition increases over the coming years and thus provide our students with a higher return on investment in their education in addition to the increased flexibility and convenience. We are more than 50% through the transformation and expect to be complete with this process by the end of 2024.
Programs and Areas of Study
We structure our program offerings to provide our students with a practical, career-oriented education and position them for attractive entry-level job opportunities in their chosen fields. Our diploma/certificate programs typically take between 19 to 104 weeks to complete, with tuition ranging from $7,800 to $46,000. Our associate degree programs typically take between 69 to 92 weeks to complete, with tuition ranging from $31,000 to $40,000. As of December 31, 2023, all of our schools offer diploma and certificate programs and nine of our schools are currently approved to offer associate degree programs. In order to accommodate the schedules of our students and maximize classroom utilization at some of our campuses, we typically offer courses four to five days a week in three shifts per day and start new classes every month. We update and expand our programs frequently to reflect the latest technological advances in the field, providing our students with the specific skills and knowledge required in the current marketplace. Classroom instruction combines lectures and demonstrations by our experienced faculty with comprehensive hands-on laboratory exercises in simulated workplace environments.
Index
The following table lists the programs offered as of December 31, 2023:
Current Programs Offered
Area of Study
Associate's Degree
Diploma and Certificate
Skilled Trades
Electrical and Electronic Systems Technology Service Management, HVAC
Electrical & Electronics Systems Technology, Electrician Training, HVAC, Welding Technology, Welding Fabrication Technology, Welding and Metal Fabrication Technology, Welding with Introduction to Pipefitting, CNC Machining and Manufacturing, Advanced Manufacturing with Robotics
Automotive
Automotive Service Management, Collision Repair & Refinishing Service Management, Diesel & Truck Service Management, Heavy Equipment Maintenance Service Management
Automotive Technology, Automotive Technology with BMW, Automotive Technology with Mopar X-Press, Automotive Technology with Volkswagen, Collision Repair and Refinishing Technology, Diesel & Truck Technology, Diesel & Truck Technology with Alternate Fuel Technology, Diesel & Truck Technology with Transport Refrigeration, Heavy Equipment Service Technology
Health Sciences
Medical Assisting Technology
Medical Assistant, Patient Care Technician, Dental Assistant, Licensed Practical Nursing
Hospitality Services and Information Technology
Culinary Arts & Food Services, Cosmetology, Aesthetics, International Baking and Pastry, Nail Technology, Therapeutic Massage & Bodywork Technician. Computer Systems Support Technician.
Skilled Trades. For the year ended December 31, 2023, skilled trades were our largest area of study, representing 38% of our total average student enrollment. Our skilled trades programs are 32 to 92 weeks in length, with tuition rates ranging from $20,000 to $34,000. Our skilled trades programs include electrical, heating and air conditioning repair, welding, computerized numerical control and electronic and electronic systems technology. Graduates of our programs are qualified to obtain entry-level employment positions such as electrician, CNC machinist, cable installer, welder, wiring and heating, ventilating and air conditioning, or HVAC installer. Our graduates are employed by a wide variety of employers, including residential and commercial construction, telecommunications installation companies and architectural firms. As of December 31, 2023, we offer skilled trades programs at 15 campuses.
Automotive Technology. Automotive technology is our second largest area of study, with 31% of our total average student enrollment for the year ended December 31, 2023. Our automotive technology programs are 52 to 98 weeks in length, with tuition rates ranging from $26,000 to $46,000. We believe we are a leading provider of automotive technology education in each of our local markets. Graduates of our programs are qualified to obtain entry-level employment ranging from positions as technicians and mechanics to various apprentice level positions. Our graduates are employed by a wide variety of companies, ranging from automotive and diesel dealers, to independent auto body paint and repair shops to trucking and construction companies. As of December 31, 2023, we offer programs in automotive technology at 12 campuses. Our campuses in East Windsor, Connecticut; Nashville, Tennessee; Grand Prairie, Texas; Indianapolis, Indiana; and Denver, Colorado are destination campuses, attracting students throughout the United States and, in some cases, from abroad.
Health Sciences. For the year ended December 31, 2023, 24% of our total average student enrollment was in our health science program. Our health science programs are 27 to 104 weeks in length, with tuition rates ranging from $14,000 to $33,000. Graduates of our programs are qualified to obtain positions such as licensed practical nurse, dental assistant, medical assistant, medical administrative assistant, and claims examiner. Our graduates are employed by a wide variety of employers, including hospitals, laboratories, insurance companies, and doctors' offices. As of December 31, 2023, we offer health science programs at 12 of our campuses.
Hospitality Services & Information Technology. For the year ended December 31, 2023, 7% of our total average student enrollment was in our hospitality services programs. Our hospitality service and information technology (IT) programs are 19 to 88 weeks in length, with tuition rates ranging from $8,000 to $23,000. Our hospitality & IT programs include culinary, therapeutic massage, cosmetology, aesthetics, and computer systems support technician. Hospitality service graduates work in salons, spas, cruise ships, or are self-employed. As of December 31, 2023, we offer massage programs at two campuses and cosmetology programs at one campus. Our culinary graduates are employed by restaurants, hotels, cruise ships and bakeries. As of December 31, 2023, we offer culinary programs at two campuses. Our IT graduates obtain entry-level positions with both small and large corporations. As of December 31, 2023, we offer IT programs at four campuses.
Index
Marketing and Student Recruitment
We utilize a variety of marketing and recruiting methods to attract students and increase enrollment. Our marketing and recruiting efforts are targeted at prospective students who are high school graduates entering the workforce, or who are currently underemployed or unemployed and require additional training to enter or re-enter the workforce.
Marketing and Advertising. We utilize a fully integrated marketing approach in our lead generation and admissions process that includes the use of traditional media such as television, radio, billboards, direct mail, a variety of print media and event marketing campaigns intended to raise brand awareness. In addition, we continually grow and enhance our digital marketing efforts, which include paid search, paid and organic social media, search engine optimization, online video and display advertising and pay-per-lead channels. These digital channels currently drive the majority of our new student leads and enrollments. Our fully integrated marketing campaigns direct prospective students to contact us directly or visit our website or other customized landing pages on the internet where they will find details regarding our programs and campuses and can request additional information regarding the programs that interest them. Prospective students may also apply for admission online. Our internal systems enable us to closely monitor and track the effectiveness of each marketing execution on a daily or weekly basis and make adjustments accordingly to enhance our efficiency and limit our student acquisition costs.
Referrals. Referrals from current students, high school counselors and satisfied graduates and their employers have historically represented approximately 14% of our new student starts. Our school administrators actively work with our current students to encourage them to recommend our programs to prospective students. We endeavor to build and retain strong relationships with high school guidance counselors and instructors by offering annual seminars at our training facilities to further familiarize these individuals on the strengths of our programs.
Recruiting. Our recruiting efforts are conducted by a group of approximately 260 campus-based and field representatives who meet directly with prospective students during presentations conducted at high schools, in the prospective students’ homes or during their visit to one of our campuses. We also recruit adult career-seekers or career-changers through our campus-based representatives.
During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023, we recruited approximately 21% of our students directly out of high school. Field sales continue to be a large part of our business and developing local community relationships is one of our most important recruiting functions.
Student Admissions, Enrollment and Retention
Admissions. To attend our schools, students must have either a high school diploma or a high school equivalency certificate (or General Education Development Certificate, GED). In addition, students must complete both an admissions interview and learner assessment. We take admissions requirements very seriously as they are the best indicators of our students’ likelihood for program success and completion, leading to successful employment in their chosen industry. The learner assessment is a questionnaire designed to discover challenges and help us to address them prior to the student attending. While each of our programs has different admissions criteria, we screen all applications and counsel prospective students on the most appropriate program to increase the likelihood that they complete the requisite coursework and obtain and sustain employment following graduation.
Enrollment. We enroll students continuously throughout the year, with our largest classes enrolling in late summer or early fall following high school graduation. As of December 31, 2023, we had 13,270 students enrolled at 21 campuses and our average enrollment during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023 was 12,941 students.
Retention. To maximize student retention, the staff at each school is trained to recognize the early warning signs of a potential drop and to assist and advise students on academic, financial and employment matters. We monitor our retention rates by instructor, course, program, and campus. When we become aware that a particular instructor or program is experiencing a higher-than-normal dropout rate, we quickly seek to determine the cause of the problem and attempt to correct it. When we identify that a student is having trouble academically, we offer tutoring. As we moved to online delivery of instruction, we saw a slight decline in our student retention rate, but we believe this is temporary and will improve as our faculty becomes better skilled at hybrid teaching. To ensure that this happens, we have developed online teacher training for all faculty.
Index
Job Placement
We believe that assisting our graduates in securing employment after completing their program of study is critical to our mission as a post-secondary educational institution as well as to our ability to attract high quality students and enhance our reputation in the industry. In addition, we believe that high job placement rates result in low student loan default rates, an important requirement for continued participation in Title IV of the Higher Education Act of 1965, as amended (“Title IV Programs”). See Part I, Item 1. “Business - Regulatory Environment-Regulation of Federal Student Financial Aid Programs.” Accordingly, we dedicate significant resources to maintaining an effective graduate placement program. Our non-destination schools work closely with local employers to ensure that we are training students with skills that local employers seek. Each school has an advisory council comprised of local employers who provide us with direct feedback on how well we are preparing our students to succeed in the workplace. This enables us to tailor our programs to the marketplace. The placement staff in each of our destination schools maintains databases of potential employers throughout the country, allowing us to more effectively assist our graduates in securing employment in their career fields upon graduation. Throughout each year, we hold numerous job fairs at our facilities where we provide the opportunity for our students to meet and interact with potential employers. In addition, many of our schools have internship programs that provide our students with opportunities to work with potential employers prior to graduation. For example, some of the students in our automotive programs have the opportunity to complete a portion of their hands-on training in an actual work environment. In addition, some of our students in health sciences programs are required to participate in an externship program in which they work in the field as part of their career training. We also assist students with resume writing, interviewing and other job search skills.
Human Capital Management
Overview
We believe that each of our employees plays an important role in our enterprise. This is particularly true of our faculty. We are focused on attracting and retaining the highly qualified personnel needed to support our objectives of providing superior education in the programs that our schools provide. We believe that the diversity and inclusion of our personnel is an essential component for providing a meaningful student experience by drawing upon a variety of backgrounds and experiences.
As of December 31, 2023, we had approximately 2,300 employees, including approximately 600 full-time instructors and approximately 500 part-time instructors, and approximately 1,200 employees serving in various administrative and management positions. We had no seasonal workers. The number of individuals comprising our workforce increased by approximately 8.3% in the most recently completed fiscal year.
Our Board of Directors regularly reviews with management the following areas regarding our human capital management:
Staffing Our Schools
Our schools typically are staffed by a school president, a director of career services, a director of education, a director of administrative services, a director of admissions and, of course, a variety of instructors, all of whom are industry professionals with experience in the areas of study at that particular school.
Our average student to teacher ratio was approximately 15.6 to 1 during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023.
Diversity and Inclusion
We strive to create a culture of diversity and inclusion through our human capital management practices. The achievement of workforce diversity is one important goal in the outreach efforts for recruitment of professionals. As a result, since January 1, 2018, our diverse workforce participation percentage has increased from 34% to 44%. Further, the generational range of our workforce, as of December 31, 2023, was 23% Baby Boomers, 39% Gen Xers and 29% Millennials. The largest growth in the generational workforce makeup was in the Millennial and Gen Z groups. Our human resources programs work to eliminate discrimination and harassment in all forms and our Human Resources Department has established a diversity and inclusion policy intended to assist us in meeting our goals of establishing an environment of inclusion and opportunity in hiring, promotions, training and development, working conditions and compensation. In addition, the Company has adopted a Human Rights Policy that reflects, among other things our commitment to anti-discrimination in hiring and otherwise.
Development, Training and Retention
The Company employs a staff to attract and engage talent and applies fully integrated recruiting software to track and manage hiring processes for our campuses and corporate functions. We hire our faculty in accordance with established criteria, including relevant work experience, educational background and accreditation and state regulatory standards. We require meaningful industry experience of our teaching staff in order to maintain the high quality of instruction in all of our programs that we expect and to address current and industry-specific issues in our course content. In addition, we provide intensive instructional training and continuing education, including quarterly instructional development seminars, annual reviews, technical upgrade training, faculty development plans and weekly staff meetings.
Index
The Company acknowledges the relevance of managing productivity and efficiency of its workforce. The Company uses current technology resources for sales and student services tasks, education support, graduate placement services, and internal talent management. Through the application of these technology tools, productivity data is obtained for key positions and used for process improvement, training, and evaluative purposes.
The Company recognizes the value to both the Company and our students of employee knowledge and skill development throughout their careers and of preparing current employees for succession opportunities. Therefore, employees receive position-based training, as well as online access to a multitude of programs designed to support their effectiveness and growth potential. The Company identifies high-performing employee participants for acceleration training programs to develop internal candidates for succession opportunities in key functions.
Labor Relations
We believe that we have good relationships with all of our employees. At six of our 21 campuses, the teaching professionals are represented by various unions. These approximately 200 employees are covered by collective bargaining agreements that expire between 2024 and 2026. Those agreements expiring in the short term are in the process of renegotiation. We believe that we have good relationships with these unions and with the employees covered by these collective bargaining agreements and do not foresee issues with entering into satisfactory new agreements.
Our Management
We believe that our management team has the experience necessary to effectively implement our growth strategy and continue to drive positive educational and employment outcomes for our students. For a discussion of the risks relating to the attraction and retention of management and executive management employees, see Item 1A. “Risk Factors.”
Competition
The for-profit, post-secondary education industry is highly competitive and highly fragmented with no one provider controlling significant market share. Direct competition between career-oriented schools like ours and traditional four-year colleges or universities is limited. Thus, our main competitors are other for-profit, career-oriented schools, not-for-profit public schools and private schools, and public and private two-year junior and community colleges, most of which are eligible to receive funding under the federal programs of student financial aid authorized by Title IV Programs. Competition is generally based on location, the type of programs offered, the quality of instruction, placement rates, reputation, recruiting and tuition rates; therefore, our competition is different in each market depending on, among other things, the availability of other options. Public institutions are generally able to charge lower tuition than our schools, due in part to government subsidies and other financial sources not available to for-profit schools. In addition, some of our other competitors have a more extensive network of schools and campuses, which enables them to recruit students more efficiently from a wider geographic area. Nevertheless, we believe that we are able to compete effectively in our local markets because of the diversity of our program offerings, quality of instruction, the strength of our brands, our reputation and our graduates’ success in securing employment after completing their programs of study.
Our competition differs in each market depending on the curriculum that we offer. For example, a school offering automotive technology, healthcare services and skilled trades programs will have a different group of competitors than a school offering healthcare services and IT technology programs. Also, because schools can add new programs within six to 12 months, competition can emerge relatively quickly. Moreover, with the introduction of online education, the number of competitors in each market has increased because students can now attend classes from an online institution. On average, each of our schools has at least three direct competitors and at least a dozen indirect competitors.
Environmental Matters
We use limited amounts of hazardous materials at our training facilities and campuses, and generate small quantities of regulated waste such as used oil, antifreeze, paint and car batteries. As a result, our facilities and operations are subject to a variety of environmental laws and regulations governing, among other things, the use, storage and disposal of solid and hazardous substances and waste, and the clean-up of contamination at our facilities or off-site locations to which we send or have sent waste for disposal. We are also required to obtain permits for our air emissions and to meet operational and maintenance requirements at certain of our campuses. In the event we do not maintain compliance with any of these laws and regulations, or are responsible for a spill or release of hazardous materials, we could incur significant costs for cleanup or damages and fines or penalties.
We are committed to sustainability, conserving energy and limiting waste and regularly review our impact on the environment with a view to improvement. In addition, we have adopted an Environmental Policy reflecting our commitment in this regard.
Index
Regulatory Environment
The education industry is highly regulated by a wide range of federal and state agencies as well as institutional and programmatic accrediting agencies including the U.S. Department of Education (“DOE”). The vast regulatory schemes to which our industry is subject cover a significant portion of our operations such as our programs, instructional staff, administrative procedures, marketing and recruiting efforts, third-party servicers, private loan programs, and facilities, among other things. The various regulatory bodies with oversight over our business periodically issue new requirements, revise existing requirements, and modify their interpretations of existing requirements. These regulatory requirements also impact our ability to acquire or open new campuses, change our existing programs or institute new programs.
We also are subject to oversight by other federal agencies including the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (“CFPB”), the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”), and the Departments of Veterans Affairs (“VA”) and Defense (“DOD”). We cannot predict how any of the regulatory requirements to which we are subject will be applied or whether each of our schools will be able to comply with such requirements in the future.
The various approvals granted by the regulatory entities to which we are subject are what collectively allow our schools to operate and to participate in a variety of government-sponsored financial aid programs that assist students in paying for their education the most significant of which are the federal student aid programs administered by the DOE under the Higher Education Act of 1965, as amended (the “HEA”). See Part I, Item 1. “Business - Regulatory Environment - State Authorization,” “Regulatory Environment - Accreditation,” “Regulatory Environment - Regulation of Federal Student Financial Aid Programs,” and “Regulatory Environment - Other Financial Assistance Programs.” The HEA and the regulations of the DOE specify extensive criteria and numerous standards that we must satisfy in order to participate in federal financial aid programs under Title IV of the HEA (“Title IV Programs”). Generally, to participate in Title IV Programs, an institution must be licensed or otherwise legally authorized to operate in the state where it is physically located, be accredited by an accreditor recognized by the DOE, be certified as an eligible institution by the DOE, offer at least one eligible program of education, and comply with other statutory and regulatory requirements. Students seeking financial aid under Title IV Programs obtain access to federal student financial aid through a DOE-prescribed application and eligibility certification. Each of our schools currently participates in Title IV Programs (except for the East Point, GA campus, which has applied to the DOE to participate). For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023, approximately 81% (calculated based on cash receipts) of our revenues were derived from Title IV Programs.
Also, all of our schools are currently offering both online and in-person learning. Accrediting agencies and some state bodies require schools to obtain approval and meet certain requirements in order to offer programs via distance education in states where the school does not have a campus. The DOE also generally requires schools that offer a program through distance education to students in a state in which the school is not physically located to meet the requirements of the state in order to offer programs by distance education in the state. All of our schools are currently approved to offer both distance and in-person learning by the DOE, ACCSC, and the states in which they are physically located. In addition, our Indianapolis school is an institutional participant in the National Council for State Authorization Reciprocity Agreement (“NC-SARA”) which is a voluntary agreement among member states which enables participating schools who are authorized by the state in which they are physically located to offer distance education in other participating states without obtaining additional authorization in those states.
State Authorization
To operate and offer postsecondary educational programs and to be certified to participate in Title IV Programs, each of our schools must be authorized and maintain authorization from the state in which it is physically located. Further, in order for a school to engage in educational or recruiting activities outside of its state of physical location, the school also may be required to obtain and maintain authorization from the states in which it is recruiting students or in which its students are receiving online instruction. The level of regulatory oversight varies substantially from state to state and is extensive in some states. State laws may establish standards for instruction, qualifications of faculty, location and nature of facilities and equipment, administrative procedures, marketing, recruiting, student outcomes reporting, disclosure obligations to students, limitations on mandatory arbitration clauses in enrollment agreements, requirements for distance learning including online and blended courses, financial operations, and other operational matters. Some states prescribe standards of financial responsibility and mandate that institutions post surety bonds. We have posted surety bonds on behalf of our schools and education representatives with multiple states in an aggregate amount of approximately $16.0 million. Currently, each of our schools is authorized by the applicable state education agencies to offer distance and in-person learning in the states in which the school is physically located and is authorized to recruit students in the states in which it recruits students. Our Indianapolis school also is an institutional participant in NC-SARA which enables it to offer distance learning to students located in other states. Our other schools have entered into a consortium agreement with our Indianapolis school that has been approved by ACCSC and applicable state education agencies and that enables students enrolled in one of the other schools to take courses online through the Indianapolis school.
Some of our educational programs prepare students for occupations that require professional licensure in order to work in the occupation. These programs are subject to the requirements of state occupational agencies that require our schools that offer the programs to obtain agency approval of the programs and to comply with the applicable requirements of these boards. For example, each of our schools that offer nursing, cosmetology, or massage therapy programs is required to obtain and periodically renew approvals from the applicable occupational agencies that regulate these programs in the state in which the schools are physically located. If we fail to maintain our approvals or comply with applicable requirements, we could lose our authority to offer the impacted programs and could be subject to other sanctions.
Index
The DOE has commenced a negotiated rulemaking process to develop new regulations on topics that include state authorization. The DOE has scheduled meetings from January through March 2024 for a negotiated rulemaking committee to consider proposed regulations on state authorization topics including, for example, state authorization reciprocity agreements that require institutions to have a system to report student complaints to the state in which a student resides. We cannot predict the ultimate timing or content of any new regulations that might emerge from this process. See Part I, Item 1. “Business - Regulatory Environment - Negotiated Rulemaking.”
If any of our schools fail to comply with state licensing requirements, they may be subject to the loss of state licensure or authorization. If any one of our schools lost its authorization from the education agency of the state in which the school is located, or failed to comply with the DOE’s state authorization requirements, that school would lose its eligibility to participate in Title IV Programs, the Title IV Program eligibility of its related additional locations could be affected, the impacted schools would be unable to offer its programs, and we could be forced to close the schools. If one of our schools lost its state authorization from a state other than the state in which the school is located, the school would not be able to recruit students or to operate in that state.
Accreditation
Accreditation is a non-governmental process through which a school submits to ongoing qualitative and quantitative review by an organization of peer institutions. Accrediting agencies primarily examine the academic quality of the school’s instructional programs, and a grant of accreditation is generally viewed as confirmation that the school’s programs meet generally accepted academic standards. Accrediting agencies also review the administrative and financial operations of the schools they accredit to ensure that each school has the resources necessary to perform its educational mission.
Accreditation by an accrediting agency recognized by the DOE is required for an institution to be certified to participate in Title IV Programs. In order to be recognized by the DOE, accrediting agencies must adopt specific standards for their review of educational institutions. As of December 31, 2023, 22 of our campuses are nationally accredited by the Accrediting Commission of Career Schools and Colleges (the “ACCSC”) which is recognized by the DOE. As of December 31, 2023, the East Point, GA campus was not operational.
If the DOE withdraws the recognition of an accrediting agency, the HEA indicates that the DOE may continue the eligibility of qualified institutions accredited by the accrediting agency for a period of up to 18 months from the date of the withdrawal of the DOE’s recognition of the accrediting agency. If provided, this period would provide time for institutions to apply for accreditation from another DOE-recognized accrediting body. The DOE could impose provisional certification and other conditions and restrictions on such institutions during this time period. If the DOE declines to continue its recognition of ACCSC and if the subsequent period for obtaining accreditation from another DOE-recognized accrediting agency lapses before we obtain accreditation from another DOE-recognized accrediting agency (or if the DOE does not provide such a period for institutions to obtain other accreditation), our schools could lose Title IV eligibility. On May 25, 2023, the DOE notified ACCSC that it would continue the DOE’s recognition of the agency as a nationally recognized accreditor for three years.
Index
The following is a list of the dates on which each campus was accredited by its accrediting commission and the date by which its accreditation must be renewed.
Accrediting Commission of Career Schools and Colleges Reaccreditation Dates
School
Last Accreditation Letter
Next Accreditation
Philadelphia, PA2
September 1, 2023
May 1, 2028
Union, NJ1
May 24, 2019
February 1,20244
Mahwah, NJ1
October 15, 2020
August 1, 20244
Melrose Park, IL2
December 2, 2019
November 1, 20244
Denver, CO1
September 6, 2022
February 1, 2026
Columbia, MD2
September 1, 2023
February 1, 2027
Grand Prairie, TX1
May 26, 2022
August 1, 2026
Allentown, PA2
May 23, 2023
January 1, 2027
Nashville, TN1
March 8, 2023
May 1, 2027
Indianapolis, IN
May 23, 2023
November 1, 2026
New Britain, CT
December 1, 2023
January 1, 2028
Shelton, CT2
May 23, 2023
January 1, 2028
Queens, NY1
September 4, 2018
June 1, 20234
East Windsor, CT2
October 17, 2017
February 1, 20234
South Plainfield, NJ1
December 2, 2019
August 1, 20244
Iselin, NJ
May 15, 2018
May 15, 20234
Moorestown, NJ3
May 15, 2018
May 15, 20234
Paramus, NJ3
May 15, 2018
May 15, 20234
Lincoln, RI3
May 15, 2018
May 15, 20234
Summerlin, NV3
May 15, 2018
May 15, 20234
Marietta, GA3
May 1, 2022
May 1, 2027
East Point, GA2
December 20, 2023
December 20, 2025
Branch campus of main campus in Indianapolis, IN
Branch campus of main campus in New Britain, CT
Branch campus of main campus in Iselin, NJ
Campus going through reaccreditation
If one of our schools fails to comply with accrediting commission requirements, the institution and its main and/or branch campuses are subject to the loss of accreditation or may be placed on probation or a special monitoring or reporting status which, if the noncompliance is not resolved, could result in loss of accreditation or restrictions on the addition of new locations, new programs, or other substantive changes. If any one of our schools loses its accreditation, students attending that school would no longer be eligible to receive Title IV Program funding.
The DOE recently commenced a negotiated rulemaking process with meetings scheduled for January through March 2024 on a number of topics including amendments to the regulations on accreditation. See Part I, Item 1. “Business - Regulatory Environment - Negotiated Rulemaking.” The proposals currently under discussion include amended regulations regarding the standards relating to the DOE’s recognition of accrediting agencies and using a risk-based approach for prioritizing DOE review of accreditors which could lead to heightened scrutiny of certain accreditors including our institutional accrediting body, ACCSC. The proposals also include rules that would require accreditors to take action more quickly when they identify areas of noncompliance and limit the amount of time an institution can be out of compliance with accreditor standards. The proposals also would require accreditors to strengthen their standards for the review of substantive changes in certain circumstances which could increase the level of accreditor scrutiny of substantive changes at our schools. We cannot predict the ultimate timing or content of any new regulations that might emerge from this process. See Part I, Item 1. “Business - Regulatory Environment - Negotiated Rulemaking.”
Index
Programmatic accreditation is yet another approval necessary in certain circumstances. Specifically, it is the process through which specific programs are reviewed and approved by industry and program-specific accrediting entities. Although programmatic accreditation is not generally necessary for Title IV Program eligibility, such accreditation may be required to operate the program in the state, to allow students to sit for certain licensure exams, or to work in a particular profession or career or to meet other requirements.
Nature of Federal and State Support for Post-Secondary Education
As noted above, the federal government provides a substantial part of the financial support for post-secondary education through Title IV Programs, in the form of grants and loans to students who can use those funds at any institution that has been certified as eligible by the DOE. Most aid under Title IV Programs is awarded on the basis of financial need, generally defined as the difference between the cost of attending the institution and the expected amount a student and his or her family can reasonably contribute to that cost. A recipient of Title IV Program funds must maintain a satisfactory grade point average and progress in a timely manner toward completion of his or her program of study and must meet other applicable eligibility requirements for the receipt of Title IV Program funds. In addition, each school must ensure that Title IV Program funds are properly accounted for and disbursed in the correct amounts to eligible students and provide reports on recipient data.
Other Financial Assistance Programs
Some of our students receive financial aid from federal sources other than Title IV Programs, such as programs administered by the VA. In addition, some states also provide financial aid to our students in the form of grants, loans or scholarships. The eligibility requirements for state financial aid and these other federal aid programs vary among the funding agencies and by program. States that provide financial aid to our students are facing significant budgetary constraints and some of them have reduced the level of state financial aid available to our students. Due to state budgetary shortfalls and constraints in certain states in which we operate, we believe that the overall level of state financial aid for our students is likely to continue to decrease in the near term, but we cannot predict how significant any such reductions will be or how long they will last. Federal budgetary shortfalls and constraints, or decisions by federal lawmakers to limit or prohibit access by our institutions or their students to federal financial aid, could result in a decrease in the level of federal financial aid for our students.
In fiscal year 2023, we derived approximately 5.5% of our revenues, on a cash basis, from veterans’ benefits programs, which include the Post-9/11 GI Bill and Veteran Readiness and Employment services. To continue participation in veterans’ benefits programs, an institution must comply with certain requirements established by the VA, including that the institution must, among other things, report on the enrollment status of eligible students, maintain student records and make such records available for inspection, follow rules applicable to the individual benefits programs, comply with rules applicable to distance education and hybrid programs, and comply with applicable limits on the percentage of students having a portion of their tuition or other institutional charges paid by the school or with certain veterans’ benefits. If we fail to comply with these or other applicable requirements, we could be subject to liabilities or sanctions including the loss of eligibility to participate in the programs.
The VA shares responsibility for VA benefit approval and oversight with designated State Approving Agencies (“SAAs”). SAAs play a critical role in evaluating institutions and their programs to determine if they meet VA benefit eligibility requirements. Processes and approval criteria, as well as interpretation of applicable requirements, can vary from state to state. Therefore, approval in one state does not necessarily result in approval in all states. Changes in the applicable statutes, regulations, or appropriations applicable to the programs could impact our eligibility or funding under the programs.
The VA imposes limitations on the percentage of students per program who have a portion of their tuition or other institutional charges paid by the school or with certain veterans’ benefits, unless the program qualifies for certain waivers. On January 16, 2024, the VA published new regulations that, among other things, eliminate certain exceptions from these limitations and changed the criteria for obtaining a waiver of these rules. The VA simultaneously issued a bulletin delaying the applicability date to one year after the publication of the regulation to allow institutions to implement any necessary changes in their policies to comply with the new regulations. These new rules could make it more difficult for our programs to comply with these limitations. If the VA determines that a program is out of compliance with these limitations, the VA will continue to provide benefits to current students, but new students will not be eligible to use their veterans’ benefits for an affected program until we demonstrate compliance. Additionally, the VA requires a campus be in operation for two years in certain cases before it can apply to participate in VA benefit programs. All of our campuses are eligible to participate in VA education benefit programs with the exception of our new campus in East Point, Georgia which is in the process of applying for eligibility and is not subject to the two-year waiting period before applying for eligibility.
During 2012, President Obama signed an Executive Order directing the U.S. Department of Defense (“DOD”), the VA and DOE to establish “Principles of Excellence” (“Principles”), based on certain guidelines set forth in the Executive Order, to apply to educational institutions receiving federal funding for service members, veterans and family members. As requested, we provided written confirmation of our intent to comply with the Principles to the VA in June 2012. We are required to comply with the Principles to continue recruitment activities on military installations. Additionally, there is a requirement to execute a memorandum of understanding (“MOU”) with the DOD as well as with certain individual installations. Each of our institutions has an MOU with the DOD. If our campuses fail to comply with VA, DOD, SAA, and other requirements applicable to financial aid programs for veterans or active military members, our schools and students could lose access to this funding or could be subject to restrictions or conditions on ability to receive such funding.
Index
Regulation of Federal Student Financial Aid Programs
As noted above, to participate in Title IV Programs, an institution must be authorized to offer its programs by the relevant state education agencies in the state in which it is physically located, be accredited by an accrediting commission recognized by the DOE and be certified as eligible by the DOE. The DOE will certify an institution to participate in Title IV Programs only after reviewing and approving an institution’s application to participate in Title IV Programs. The DOE defines an institution to consist of both a main campus and its additional locations, if any. Under this definition, for DOE purposes as of December 31, 2023 we had the following three institutions, collectively consisting of three main campuses and 19 additional locations:
Main Institution/Campus(es)
Additional Location(s)
Iselin, NJ
Moorestown, NJ
Paramus, NJ
Lincoln, RI
Marietta, GA
Las Vegas, NV (Summerlin)
New Britain, CT
Shelton, CT
Philadelphia, PA
East Windsor, CT
Melrose Park, IL
Allentown, PA
Columbia, MD
East Point, GA1
Indianapolis, IN
Grand Prairie, TX
Nashville, TN
Denver, CO
Union, NJ
Mahwah, NJ
Queens, NY
South Plainfield, NJ
Applied to participate in Title IV programs.
Each institution must periodically apply to the DOE for continued certification to participate in Title IV Programs. The institution also must apply for recertification when it undergoes a change in ownership resulting in a change of control and may come under DOE review when it undergoes a substantive change that requires the submission of an application, such as opening an additional location or raising the highest academic credential it offers. All institutions are recertified on various dates for various periods of time. The following table sets forth the expiration dates for each of our institutions’ current Title IV Program participation agreements:
Institution
Expiration Date of Current
Program Participation
Agreement
Iselin, NJ
December 31, 20242
Indianapolis, IN
December 31, 20242
New Britain, CT
December 31, 20242
Provisionally certified.
The DOE typically provides provisional certification to an institution following a change in ownership resulting in a change of control and also may provisionally certify an institution for other reasons, including, but not limited to, noncompliance with certain standards of administrative capability and financial responsibility. The DOE provisionally certified all of our institutions based on findings in recent audits of each institution’s Title IV Program compliance that the DOE alleges identified deficiencies related to DOE regulations regarding an institution’s level of administrative capability. An institution that is provisionally certified receives fewer due process rights than those received by other institutions in the event the DOE takes certain adverse actions against the institution, is required to obtain prior DOE approvals of new campuses and educational programs, and may be subject to heightened scrutiny by the DOE. Provisional certification makes it easier for the DOE to revoke or decline to renew our Title IV eligibility if the DOE chooses to take such an action against us and other provisionally certified for-profit schools without undergoing a formal administrative appeal process. The DOE could attempt to use an institution’s provisional certification as a basis for imposing additional conditions or restrictions on the institution.
Index
The DOE published final regulations on a variety of topics on October 31, 2023, including but not limited to rules to authorize additional conditions and restrictions on provisionally certified institutions. See Part I, Item 1. “Business - Regulatory Environment - Negotiated Rulemaking.” The regulations have a general effective date of July 1, 2024 and expand the grounds for placing institutions on provisional certification, expand the types of conditions
the DOE may impose on provisionally certified institutions, and expand the number of requirements contained in the institution’s program participation agreement with the DOE (including, among other requirements, an obligation to comply with all state laws related to closure).
The regulations also expand the conditions to which institutions must agree as part of their participation in the Title IV programs. For example, one of the conditions prohibits the length of certain educational programs from exceeding the required minimum number of hours established by applicable state(s) for entry-level training requirements for the occupation for which the programs train students. We are still evaluating the potential impact of this requirement, which applies to new students enrolling on or after July 1, 2024, but the new requirement will require us to modify or phase out some of our educational programs.
The final regulations allow the DOE to place institutions on provisional certification if, among other reasons, the institution does not meet financial responsibility factors or administrative capability standards, if the institution is required by the DOE to submit a letter of credit as a result of a mandatory or discretionary triggering event, or if the DOE deems the institution to be at risk of closure. The final regulations also allow the DOE to determine whether to certify or impose conditions on an institution based on consideration of factors including, for example, the institution’s withdrawal rate, the amounts the institution spent on recruiting activities, advertising, and other pre-enrollment activities, and the passage rate for licensure exams for programs that are designed to meet the educational requirements for a professional license required for employment in an occupation.
The final regulations also expand the types of conditions the DOE can impose on provisionally certified institutions including, for example, restrictions on the addition of new programs or locations, restrictions on the rate of growth or new enrollment of students or of Title IV volume, restrictions on the institution providing a teach-out on behalf of another institution, restrictions on the acquisition of another participating institution (including financial protection requirements), additional reporting requirements, limitations on entering into certain written arrangements with institutions or entities for providing part of an educational program, requirements to submit marketing and recruiting materials to DOE for approval (if the institution is alleged or found to have engaged in substantial misrepresentations to students, engaged in aggressive recruiting practices, or violated incentive compensation rules), reporting requirements for institutions that received a government formal inquiry such as a subpoena related to its marketing or recruitment or its federal financial aid, and other potential conditions imposed by the DOE.
The new regulations increase the possibility that our schools could remain on provisional certification, be subject to additional reporting requirements and other conditions and sanctions such as letter of credit requirements and be subject to a potential loss of Title IV eligibility if our efforts to comply with the new regulations are unsuccessful.
As noted above, the DOE is responsible for overseeing compliance with Title IV Program requirements. As a result, each of our schools is subject to detailed oversight and review, and must comply with a complex framework of laws and regulations. Additionally, the DOE periodically revises its regulations and changes its interpretation of existing laws and regulations.
Significant factors relating to Title IV Programs that could adversely affect us include the following:
Congressional Action. Political and budgetary concerns significantly affect Title IV Programs. Congress periodically revises the HEA and other laws governing Title IV Programs. It is not known if or when Congress will pass final legislation that comprehensively reauthorizes and amends the HEA or other laws affecting U.S. federal student aid.
In addition, Congress reviews and determines federal appropriations for Title IV Programs on an annual basis. Congress can also make changes in the laws affecting Title IV Programs in the annual appropriations bills and in other laws it enacts between the HEA reauthorizations such as its recent amendment to the 90/10 rule in the HEA. See Part I, Item 1. “Business - Regulatory Environment - 90/10 Rule.” Because a significant percentage of our revenues are derived from Title IV Programs, any action by Congress or the DOE that significantly reduces Title IV Program funding, that limits or restricts the ability of our schools, programs, or students to receive funding through the Title IV Programs, or that imposes new restrictions or constraints upon our business or operations could reduce our student enrollment and our revenues, and could increase our administrative costs and require us to modify our practices in order for our schools to comply fully with Title IV Program requirements. The potential for changes that may be adverse to us and other for-profit schools like ours may increase as a result of changes in political leadership. Further, current requirements for student or school participation in Title IV Programs may change or one or more of the present Title IV Programs could be replaced by other programs with materially different student or school eligibility requirements.
Index
Gainful Employment. In October 2014, the DOE issued final gainful employment regulations requiring each educational program offered by our institutions to achieve threshold rates in at least one of two debt measure categories related to an annual debt to annual earnings ratio and an annual debt to discretionary income ratio. In 2019, the DOE rescinded the gainful employment regulations. The DOE initiated a negotiated rulemaking process in January 2022 that was considering, among other issues, establishing new gainful employment requirements that would be applicable to all of our educational programs. On October 10, 2023, the DOE published final new gainful employment regulations which have a general effective date of July 1, 2024.
The new gainful employment regulations establish rules for annually evaluating each of our educational programs based on the calculation of debt-to-earnings rates (an annual debt-to-earnings rate and a discretionary debt-to-earnings rate) and a median earnings measure. The DOE will calculate these rates and measures under complex regulatory formulas outlined in the regulations and using data such as student debt (including not only Title IV loans but also certain private loans and extensions of credit), student earnings data, and comparative median earnings data for young working adults with only a high school diploma or GED. If one or more of our educational programs were to yield debt-to-earnings rates or a median earnings measure that do not comply with regulatory benchmarks for two of three consecutive years, we would lose Title IV eligibility for each of the impacted educational programs. The regulations will also require us to provide warnings to current and prospective students for programs in danger of losing of Title IV eligibility (which could deter prospective students from enrolling and current students from continuing their respective programs). The regulations also include provisions for providing certifications and reporting data to the DOE and providing required student disclosures related to gainful employment.
The regulations include gainful employment rates and measures that will be based in part on data that is not readily accessible to us and other institutions, which make it difficult for us to predict with certainty how our educational programs will perform under the new gainful employment benchmarks and the extent to which certain programs could become ineligible for Title IV participation. The DOE released performance data at the time it published the proposed regulations that calculates rates for each school’s program while acknowledging that the methodology used to produce the calculations differs from the methodology in the proposed regulations due to limitations in data availability. Because we do not have access to all of the data that will ultimately be used under the regulations to evaluate our programs and the DOE has not made this data available to us, we cannot predict whether, or the extent to which, our programs could fail to comply with the new gainful employment benchmarks. Moreover, we do not have control over some of the factors that could impact the rates and measures for our programs which will limit our ability to eliminate or mitigate the impact of the regulations on us and our educational programs. The DOE announced at the time it released the final gainful employment regulations that the first official outcome rates will be published in early 2025 and that programs that fail the same gainful employment metric in the first two years the rates are issued will become ineligible in 2026.
The implementation of new gainful employment regulations could require us to eliminate or modify certain educational programs, could result in the loss of our students’ access to Title IV Program funds for the affected programs, and could have a significant impact on the rate at which students enroll in our programs and on our business and results of operations.
Borrower Defense to Repayment Regulations. The DOE’s current Borrower Defense to Repayment regulations establish processes for borrowers to receive from the DOE a discharge of the obligation to repay certain Title IV Program loans based on certain acts or omissions by the institution or a covered party. The current regulations also establish processes for the DOE to seek recovery from the institution of the amount of discharged loans.
On November 1, 2022, the DOE published final regulations on Borrower Defense to Repayment and other topics with a general effective date of July 1, 2023. The final regulations are extensive and generally make it easier for borrowers to obtain discharges of student loans and for the DOE to assess liabilities and other sanctions on institutions based on the loan discharges. Among other things, the final regulations establish a new process and standard for evaluating borrower applications for loan discharges that would apply to all claims submitted or pending as of the anticipated July 1, 2023 effective date of the regulations. The new process and standard differ from the prior regulations that established a separate process and standard for each of three categories of loans depending on the date the loans were disbursed to students (i.e., prior to July 1, 2017, between July 1, 2017 and June 30, 2020, and on or after July 1, 2020). As a result, the new process and standard will apply not only to loans disbursed on or after July 1, 2023, but also to older loans as long as the discharge requests are still pending as of July 1, 2023 or are submitted on or after July 1, 2023.
The final DOE regulations continue to permit the imposition of liabilities on institutions for the amount of discharged loans. For loans disbursed prior to July 1, 2023, the DOE indicated that it will not use the same standard for determining institutional liabilities under the new regulations as it will use for determining whether to discharge the loans. Instead, the DOE indicated that it will seek recoupment from an institution for such loans only if they would have been discharged under the standards used under current regulations based on the date the loans were disbursed to students. However, the new regulations will make it easier for the DOE to recover from the institution the liabilities that the DOE elects to impose.
Index
The new regulations also expand the types of conduct that could result in a discharge of student loans including: 1) an expanded list of substantial misrepresentations; 2) a new section regarding substantial omissions of fact; 3) breaches of contract; 4) a new section regarding aggressive and deceptive recruitment; or 5) state or federal judgments or final DOE actions that could result in a borrower defense claim. Some of these forms of conduct also could result in other sanctions against the institutions. See Part I, Item 1. “Business - Regulatory Environment - Substantial Misrepresentation.” The new regulations also make it easier for borrowers to qualify for loan discharges by enabling the DOE to permit group consideration of borrower claims under certain circumstances either on its own initiative or at the request of state requestors or certain third-party legal assistance organizations (which could enable the DOE to evaluate and rule on a broad group of claims more quickly than evaluating the claims individually), establishing a rebuttable presumption that borrowers in a group claim reasonably relied on (and were impacted by) acts or omissions giving rise to a borrower defense, establishing a Borrower Defense to Repayment claim based on a separate state law standard if the DOE does not approve claims based on one of the other types of conduct for borrowers with loans first disbursed prior to July 1, 2017, and providing the DOE with the discretion to reopen its decisions at any time in accordance with regulatory requirements.
The new regulations also reinstitute a general prohibition on institutions requiring borrowers to agree to mandatory pre-dispute arbitration agreements and requiring students to waive the ability to participate in a class-action lawsuit with respect to a borrower defense claim. The new regulations also require institutions to disclose publicly and notify the DOE of judicial and arbitration filings and awards pertaining to borrower defense claims. The new regulations also include provisions on other topics including public service loan forgiveness, eliminating capitalization on student loans in some cases, total and permanent disability discharges, and closed school loan discharges (see Part I, Item 1. “Business - Regulatory Environment - Closed School Loan Discharges”), and false certification discharges (e.g., when an institution falsely certifies an ineligible student’s eligibility for loans).
The final regulations impose new requirements and processes that will make it easier for borrowers to obtain discharges of their loans and for the DOE to recover liabilities from institutions and impose other sanctions. However, the borrower defense and closed school loan discharge provisions of the new regulations are currently under an injunction ordered by the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals in August 2023. Career Colleges and Schools of Texas filed a lawsuit challenging the regulations in February 2023 and appealed to the Fifth Circuit after the U.S. District Court denied a motion for a preliminary injunction to block enforcement of the new regulations while the case is pending. After granting the injunction in August 2023, the Fifth Circuit heard oral argument in the case on November 6, 2023, but has not yet issued a decision. We cannot predict the duration of the injunction or the ultimate outcome of the lawsuit.
In April 2021, the Company received communication from the DOE indicating that the DOE was in receipt of a number of borrower defense applications containing allegations concerning our schools and requiring that the DOE undertake a fact-finding process pursuant to DOE regulations. Among other things, the communication outlines a process by which the DOE would provide to us the applications and allow us the opportunity to submit responses to them. Further, the communication outlines certain information requests, relating to the period between 2007 and 2013, in connection with the DOE’s preliminary review of the borrower defense applications. Based upon publicly available information, it appears that the DOE has undertaken similar reviews of other educational institutions which have also been the subject of various borrower defense applications. We have received the borrower application claims and have completed the process of thoroughly reviewing and responding to each borrower application as well as providing information in response to the DOE’s requests.
We are not able to predict the outcome of the DOE’s review at this time. If the DOE disagrees with our legal and factual grounds for contesting the applications, the DOE may impose liabilities on the Company based on the discharge of the loans at issue in the pending applications, which could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations. The DOE also could attempt to apply the new regulations to the pending applications which could increase the likelihood of the DOE granting the application because the proposed regulations are more favorable to borrowers.
In August 2022, the Company received communication from the DOE regarding a single borrower defense application submitted on behalf of a group of students who were enrolled in a single educational program at two of our schools in Massachusetts between 2010 and 2013. The communication, which did not state who submitted the application or when it was submitted, asked us to submit a response within 60 calendar days. We timely responded to the DOE’s letter, notwithstanding the absence of a response to our request for additional information about the student claims. We are waiting for the DOE’s reply to our response and to our request for information about the student claims. Given the early stage of this matter, management is not able to predict the outcome of the DOE’s review at this time. If the DOE disagrees with our legal and factual grounds for contesting the application, the DOE may impose liabilities on the Company based on the discharge of the loans at issue in the pending application, which could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.
On June 22, 2022, the plaintiff student loan borrowers in a class action against the DOE in federal court in California (Sweet v. Cardona, No. 3:19-cv-3674 (N.D. Cal.)) and the DOE announced a proposed settlement agreement to resolve claims that the DOE has failed to timely decide Borrower Defense to Repayment applications submitted to the DOE. The proposed settlement included three categories of relief for student loan borrowers. First, it set forth a list of approximately 150 institutions, including Lincoln Technical Institute and Lincoln College of Technology, and, under the settlement, the DOE would agree to discharge loans and refund prior loan payments to class members with loan debt associated with an institution on the list (which includes Lincoln institutions). The class action plaintiffs and the DOE stated that the DOE had determined that attendance at one of the listed institutions justifies presumptive relief allegedly based on strong indicia regarding substantial misconduct by the institutions, whether credibly alleged or in some instances proven, and the purportedly high rate of class members with applications related to the listed schools. Second, the proposed settlement included new procedures for DOE to resolve pending borrower defense claims associated with other schools not on the list. Third, for any student loan borrower who submitted a borrower defense application after June 22, 2022 and before the final approval of the settlement, the proposed settlement would require the DOE to review the applications under the DOE’s 2016 regulatory standards and issue decisions within 36 months, or else the applications would be discharged in full.
Index
At the time the plaintiffs and DOE announced the proposed settlement, Lincoln was not a party to the lawsuit and none of the named plaintiffs had attended a Lincoln institution. In August 2022, Lincoln and three other schools were granted permission to intervene in the lawsuit to protect their interests in the finalization and implementation of any settlement agreement the court might approve. In October 2022, the four intervening schools, including Lincoln, filed objections to the final approval of the settlement, asserting reputational harms from the schools’ inclusion on the settlement’s list of schools and denial of schools’ due process rights under the DOE’s borrower defense regulations.
On November 16, 2022, the federal district court overruled the four schools’ objections and approved the settlement as proposed. As a result of this final approval, the DOE has estimated that approximately 196,000 student loan borrowers who attended one of the listed schools (including Lincoln institutions) will receive automatic student loan discharges; that another approximately 100,000 student loan borrowers who attended other schools not on the list would receive decisions under new procedures; and that approximately 250,000 student loan borrowers who submitted borrower defense applications between June 22, 2022 and November 16, 2022 would receive decisions under the DOE’s 2016 regulatory standards within 36 months or else receive automatic student loan discharges.
On January 13, 2023, Lincoln appealed the settlement’s final approval to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Two of the three other intervenor schools also appealed on the same date. The three appealing schools also sought to stay the implementation of the settlement while their appeals were being decided, but the requested stay was denied by the district court, the Ninth Circuit, and the U.S. Supreme Court. As a result, the DOE is implementing the settlement relief while the three schools appeal the settlement’s final approval.
Lincoln and the two other appealing schools filed their opening appellate brief in the Ninth Circuit on May 3, 2023. The plaintiffs and the DOE filed their opposition appellate briefs on August 2, 2023. Lincoln and the two other appealing schools filed their reply appellate brief on September 22, 2023. The Ninth Circuit heard oral argument on December 5, 2023, and is currently considering the appeal.
It is not possible at this time to predict whether the settlement will be upheld on appeal, what actions the DOE might take if the settlement is upheld on appeal, or whether the DOE or other agencies might take actions against Lincoln institutions before the appeal is decided. Such actions could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations. Even if the Ninth Circuit rules in our favor and if the approval of the settlement is overturned, the DOE already may have discharged by that time the loans associated with some or all of the pending applications. We have seen evidence that the DOE already may have discharged some of the loans associated with some of the pending applications, but the DOE has not furnished definitive data to us necessary to determine the extent to which applications have been granted. The DOE may or may not attempt to seek recoupment from applicable schools relating to approval of borrower defense applications. The settlement also requires the DOE to review and decide borrower defense applications submitted after June 22, 2022 and before November 16, 2022 within 36 months of the final settlement date. If the DOE grants some or all of these applications, the DOE also could attempt to recoup from us the loan amounts relating to these applications. If the DOE approves borrower defense applications concerning us and attempts to recoup from us the loan amounts in the approved applications, we would consider our options for challenging the legal and factual bases for such actions.
We cannot predict what other actions the DOE might take if the settlement is fully implemented, including the amount of borrower defense applications that the DOE might grant or the amount of any recoupment that the DOE might seek from us, if any. We also cannot predict the outcome of any challenges we might make to such actions.
The "90/10 Rule." Under the HEA, a proprietary institution that derives more than 90% of its total revenue from Title IV Programs (its “90/10 Rule percentage”) for two consecutive fiscal years becomes immediately ineligible to participate in Title IV Programs and may not reapply for eligibility until the end of at least two fiscal years. An institution with revenues exceeding 90% for a single fiscal year will be placed on provisional certification and may be subject to other enforcement measures, including a potential requirement to submit a letter of credit. See Part I, Item 1. “Business - Regulatory Environment - Financial Responsibility Standards.” If an institution violated the 90/10 Rule and became ineligible to participate in Title IV Programs but continued to disburse Title IV Program funds, the DOE would require the institution to repay all Title IV Program funds received by the institution after the effective date of the loss of eligibility. A loss of eligibility to participate in Title IV Programs for any of our institutions would have a significant impact on the rate at which our students enroll in our programs and on our business and results of operations.
We have calculated that for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023 our institutions’ 90/10 Rule percentages ranged from approximately 79% to 84%. For fiscal year 2023, none of our existing institutions derived more than 90% of its revenues from Title IV Programs. Our calculations are subject to review by the DOE.
Index
In March 2021, the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 (“ARPA”) was signed into law. Among other provisions, the ARPA includes a provision that amends the 90/10 Rule by treating other “federal funds that are disbursed or delivered to or on behalf of a student to be used to attend such institution” in the same way as Title IV Program funds are currently treated in the 90/10 Rule calculation. This means that our institutions will be required to limit the combined amount of Title IV Program funds and applicable “federal funds” revenue in a fiscal year to no more than 90% in a fiscal year as calculated under the rule. Consequently, the ARPA change to the 90/10 Rule is expected to increase the 90/10 Rule calculations at our institutions. The ARPA does not identify the specific federal funding programs that will be covered by this provision, but it is expected to include funding from federal student aid programs such as the veterans’ benefits programs, which include the Post-9/11 GI Bill and Veterans Readiness and Employment services, from which we derived approximately 5.5% of our revenues on a cash basis in fiscal year 2023.
The ARPA states that the amendments to the 90/10 Rule apply to institutional fiscal years beginning on or after January 1, 2023 and are subject to the HEA’s negotiated rulemaking process. Beginning in January 2022, the DOE convened negotiated rulemaking committee meetings on a variety of topics including the 90/10 Rule. The committee reached consensus on proposed 90/10 Rule regulations during meetings in March 2022. On July 28, 2022, the DOE published proposed regulations regarding the 90/10 Rule among other topics. The DOE published final regulations on October 28, 2022 with a general effective date of July 1, 2023.
The new 90/10 Rule regulations contain several new and amended provisions on a variety of topics including, among other things, confirming that the rules apply to fiscal years ending on or after January 1, 2023; noting that the DOE plans to identify the types of federal funds to be included in the 90/10 Rule in a notice in the Federal Register (which the DOE subsequently confirmed in a published notice on December 21, 2022 includes a wide range of federal student aid programs including VA and DOD programs); requiring institutions to disburse funds that students are eligible to receive for a fiscal year before the end of the fiscal year rather than delaying disbursements until a subsequent fiscal year; updating requirements for counting revenues generated from certain educational activities associated with institutional programs, from certain non-Title IV eligible educational programs, and from institutional aid programs such as institutional loans, scholarships, and income share agreements; updating technical rules for the 90/10 Rule calculation; including rules for sanctions for noncompliance with the 90/10 Rule and for required notifications to students and the DOE by the institution of noncompliance with the 90/10 Rule. The new regulations under the 90/10 Rule could have a material adverse effect on us and other schools like ours.
We continue to evaluate the impact of the new 90/10 Rule regulations on our business. We anticipate making changes to our operations in order to address the provisions in the 90/10 Rule and in order to maintain the 90/10 Rule percentages at our institutions below the 90% threshold as calculated under DOE regulations. However, we do not have significant control over the amount of Title IV Program funds that our students may receive and borrow. Our institutions’ 90/10 Rule percentages can be increased by increases in Title IV Programs aid availability (including, for example, increases in Pell Grant funds) and can be decreased by decreases in the availability of state grant program funding and other sources of student aid that do not count as Title IV Programs funds in the 90/10 Rule calculation. Our institutions’ 90/10 Rule percentages also will increase when the ARPA amendments to the 90/10 Rule take effect to the extent that students eligible to receive military and veteran education assistance enroll and use their financial assistance at our institutions. We cannot be certain that the changes we make in the future will succeed in maintaining our institutions’ 90/10 Rule percentages below the required levels or that the changes will not materially impact our business operations, revenues, and operating costs. It also is possible that Congress or the DOE could amend the 90/10 Rule in the future to lower the 90% threshold, change the calculation methodology, or make other changes to the 90/10 Rule that could make it more difficult for our institutions to comply with the 90/10 Rule.
As noted above, if any of our institutions lose eligibility to participate in Title IV Programs, that loss would also adversely affect our students’ access to various government-sponsored student financial aid programs, and would have a significant impact on the rate at which our students enroll in our programs and on our business and results of operations.
Student Loan Defaults. The HEA limits participation in Title IV Programs by institutions whose former students defaulted on the repayment of federally guaranteed or funded student loans above a prescribed rate (the “cohort default rate”). The DOE calculates these rates based on the number of students who have defaulted, not the dollar amount of such defaults. The cohort default rate is calculated on a federal fiscal year basis and measures the percentage of students who enter repayment of a loan during the federal fiscal year and default on the loan on or before the end of the federal fiscal year or the subsequent two federal fiscal years.
Under the HEA, an institution whose Federal Family Education Loan, or FFEL, and Federal Direct Loan, or FDL, cohort default rate is 30% or greater for three consecutive federal fiscal years loses eligibility to participate in the FFEL, FDL, and Pell programs for the remainder of the federal fiscal year in which the DOE determines that such institution has lost its eligibility and for the two subsequent federal fiscal years. An institution whose FFEL and FDL cohort default rate for any single federal fiscal year exceeds 40% loses its eligibility to participate in the FFEL and FDL programs for the remainder of the federal fiscal year in which the DOE determines that such institution has lost its eligibility and for the two subsequent federal fiscal years. If an institution’s three-year cohort default rate equals or exceeds 30% in two of the three most recent federal fiscal years for which the DOE has issued cohort default rates, the institution may be placed on provisional certification status and could be required to submit a letter of credit to the DOE. See Part I, Item 1. “Business - Regulatory Environment - Financial Responsibility Standards.”
In September 2023, the DOE released the final cohort default rates for the 2020 federal fiscal year. These are the most recent final rates published by the DOE. The rates for our existing institutions for the 2020 federal fiscal year were zero. None of our institutions had a cohort default rate equal to or greater than 30% for the 2020 federal fiscal year. The DOE implemented a temporary suspension of repayment obligations and interest accruals on federal student loans during the COVID-19 pandemic for a period of over three years which contributed to a substantial reduction in our cohort default rates. We expect borrower defaults to increase during periods after the expiration of the temporary suspension which we expect will result in higher cohort default rates in the future particularly if borrowers do not successfully resume timely repayment of their federal student loans. We cannot predict how high our cohort default rates will increase in the future.
Index
In February 2024, the DOE released draft three-year cohort default rates for the 2021 federal fiscal year. The draft cohort default rates are subject to change pending receipt of the final cohort default rates, which the DOE is expected to publish in September 2024. The draft rates for our institutions for the 2021 federal fiscal year were zero.
Financial Responsibility Standards.
All institutions participating in Title IV Programs must satisfy specific standards of financial responsibility. The DOE evaluates institutions for compliance with these standards each year, based on the institution's annual audited financial statements, as well as following a change in ownership resulting in a change of control of the institution.
The most significant financial responsibility measurement is the institution's composite score, which is calculated by the DOE based on three ratios:
•
the equity ratio, which measures the institution's capital resources, ability to borrow and financial viability;
•
the primary reserve ratio, which measures the institution's ability to support current operations from expendable resources; and
•
the net income ratio, which measures the institution's ability to operate at a profit.
The DOE assigns a strength factor to the results of each of these ratios on a scale from negative 1.0 to positive 3.0, with negative 1.0 reflecting financial weakness and positive 3.0 reflecting financial strength. The DOE then assigns a weighting percentage to each ratio and adds the weighted scores for the three ratios together to produce a composite score for the institution. The composite score must be at least 1.5 for the institution to be deemed financially responsible without the need for further oversight.
If an institution's composite score is below 1.5, but is at least 1.0, it is in a category denominated by the DOE as "the zone." Under the DOE regulations, institutions that are in the zone typically may be permitted by the DOE to continue to participate in the Title IV Programs by choosing one of two alternatives: 1) the “Zone Alternative” under which an institution is required to make disbursements to students under the Heightened Cash Monitoring 1 (“HCM1”) payment method, or a different payment method other than the advance payment method, and to notify the DOE within 10 days after the occurrence of certain oversight and financial events or 2) submit a letter of credit to the DOE equal to 50 percent of the Title IV Program funds received by the institution during its most recent fiscal year. The DOE permits an institution to participate under the “Zone Alternative” for a period of up to three consecutive fiscal years. Under the HCM1 payment method, the institution is required to make Title IV Program disbursements to eligible students and parents before it requests or receives funds for the amount of those disbursements from the DOE. As long as the student accounts are credited before the funding requests are initiated, an institution is permitted to draw down funds through the DOE’s electronic system for grants management and payments for the amount of disbursements made to eligible students. Unlike the Heightened Cash Monitoring 2 (“HCM2”) and the reimbursement payment methods, the HCM1 payment method typically does not require schools to submit documentation to the DOE and wait for DOE approval before drawing down Title IV Program funds. A school under HCM1, HCM2 or reimbursement payment methods must also pay any credit balances due to a student before drawing down funds for the amount of those disbursements from the DOE, even if the student or parent provides written authorization for the school to hold the credit balance.
If an institution's composite score is below 1.0, the institution is considered by the DOE to lack financial responsibility. If the DOE determines that an institution does not satisfy the DOE's financial responsibility standards, depending on its composite score and other factors, that institution may establish its eligibility to participate in the Title IV Programs on an alternative basis by, among other things:
•
posting a letter of credit in an amount equal to at least 50% of the total Title IV Program funds received by the institution during the institution's most recently completed fiscal year; or
•
posting a letter of credit in an amount equal to at least 10% of the Title IV Program funds received by the institution during its most recently completed fiscal year accepting provisional certification; complying with additional DOE monitoring requirements and agreeing to receive Title IV Program funds under an arrangement other than the DOE's standard advance funding arrangement.
For the 2023 fiscal year, we calculated our composite score to be 3.0. Composite scores are subject to determination by the DOE based on its review of our consolidated audited financial statements, but we believe it is likely that the DOE will determine that our institutions comply with the composite score requirement. The DOE informed us in a letter dated November 3, 2023, that it calculated passing composite scores of 2.7 and 2.9 for the 2022 and 2021 fiscal years, respectively.
Index
On October 31, 2023, the DOE published final regulations with a general effective date of July 1, 2024, that, among other things, modify and substantially expand the existing list in the regulations of triggering events that could result in the DOE determining that an institution lacks financial responsibility and must submit to the DOE a letter of credit or other form of acceptable financial protection and accept other conditions on the institution’s Title IV Program eligibility. The regulations create lists of mandatory triggering events and discretionary triggering events.
Examples of mandatory triggering events under the final rules include a lawsuit by a federal or state authority or a qui tam lawsuit in which the Federal government has intervened, where the suit has been pending for 120 days as measured under the regulation; an action where the DOE seeks to recover the cost of adjudicated claims in favor of borrowers under the Borrower Defense to Repayment regulations and the claims would lower the institution’s composite score below 1.0; certain judgments, awards, or settlements in certain lawsuits, mediations, or administrative or arbitration proceedings; certain withdrawals of owner’s equity including by dividend; gainful employment issues; accreditor requirements to submit a teach-out plan for reasons related to financial concerns; certain actions taken against a publicly-traded company or failure to timely file certain annual or quarterly reports; 90/10 Rule issues; cohort default rate issues; contributions and distributions occurring near the fiscal year end that materially impact the composite score; certain defaults or other adverse events under a financing arrangement; or certain financial exigencies or receiverships.
Examples of discretionary triggering events under the final regulations include certain accrediting agency actions, certain accreditor events, fluctuations in Title IV volume, high annual dropout rates, indicators of significant change in the financial condition of the institution, the formation by DOE of a group process to consider borrower defense claims against the institution, the institution’s discontinuation of education programs affecting at least 25 percent of enrolled students receiving Title IV funds, the institution’s closure of locations that enroll more than 25 percent of its students who receive Title IV funds, certain state licensing agency actions, the loss of institutional or program eligibility in another federal educational assistance program, a requirement to disclose in a public filing that the company is under investigation for possible violations of law, or if the institution is cited and faces loss of education assistance funds from another federal agency if it does not comply with agency requirements. The final regulations also establish new rules for evaluating financial responsibility during a change in ownership.
The final regulations increase the likelihood that the DOE could impose a financial protection requirement and other conditions on us and our institutions. The final rules require the institution to notify the DOE of a triggering event and provide information demonstrating why the event does not warrant the submission of a letter of credit or imposition of other requirements. The final rules state that, if the DOE requires financial protection as a result of more than one mandatory or discretionary trigger, the DOE will require separate financial protection for each individual trigger, which could substantially increase the amount of financial protection we and other institutions could be required to provide to the DOE.
The expanded financial responsibility regulations could result in the DOE recalculating and reducing our composite score to account for DOE estimates of potential losses under one or more of the extensive list of triggering circumstances and also could result in the imposition of conditions and requirements, including a requirement to provide one or more letters of credit or other forms of financial protection.
Return of Title IV Program Funds. An institution participating in Title IV Programs must calculate the amount of unearned Title IV Program funds that have been disbursed to students who withdraw from their educational programs before completing them, and must return those unearned funds to the DOE or the applicable lending institution in a timely manner, which is generally within 45 days from the date the institution determines that the student has withdrawn.
If an institution is cited in an audit or program review for returning Title IV Program funds late for 5% or more of the students in the audit or program review sample, or if the regulatory auditor identifies a material weakness in the institution’s report on internal controls relating to the return of unearned Title IV Program funds, the institution may be required to post a letter of credit in favor of the DOE in an amount equal to 25% of the total amount of Title IV Program funds that should have been returned for students who withdrew in the institution's prior fiscal year.
On January 11, 2018, the DOE sent letters to our then existing Columbia, Maryland and Iselin, New Jersey institutions requiring each institution to submit a letter of credit to the DOE based on findings of late returns of Title IV Program funds in the annual Title IV Program compliance audits submitted to the DOE for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016. Accordingly, we submitted letters of credit in the amounts of $0.5 million and $0.1 million to the DOE by the February 23, 2018, deadline and we continue to comply with the letter of credit requirement. By letter dated February 16, 2021, the DOE notified us that our Columbia and Iselin institutions failed to comply with the refund requirements based on their 2017, 2018, and 2019 audits. Consequently, the DOE has required us to maintain with the DOE a letter of credit in the amount of $600,020. The DOE extended the expiration date of this letter of credit until January 31, 2025 based on its conclusion that the compliance audits for the three institutions for 2020 through 2022 contained compliance findings related to refunds even though many of the audits did not contain late refund findings.
Index
More recently, the DOE commenced a negotiated rulemaking process and scheduled meetings for January through March 2024 for a negotiated rulemaking committee to discuss proposed regulations on a number of topics including plans to amend the regulations on the requirements for institutions to return unearned Title IV funds to students who withdraw from their educational programs before completing them. The proposals including rules that if adopted in their current form would address refunds for students who do not begin attendance at the school or who withdraw from school, the requirement to determine the date a student withdrew from school, the requirement to take attendance in distance education programs, the refund calculations for clock hour programs, and the calculation of withdrawal dates and refunds for programs provided in modules. We cannot predict the ultimate timing or content of any new regulations that might emerge from this process. See Part I, Item 1. “Business - Regulatory Environment - Negotiated Rulemaking.”
Negotiated Rulemaking. The DOE initiated rulemaking on several topics in January 2022 and, after delaying the process, announced in January 2023 its intention to reinitiate the rulemaking process on topics including gainful employment, financial responsibility, administrative capability, certification procedures, ability to benefit, and improving income-driven repayment of loans. On May 19, 2023, the DOE published a notice of proposed rulemaking in the Federal Register that included proposed regulations on topics including gainful employment, financial responsibility, administrative capability, certification, and ability to benefit. On October 10, 2023, the DOE published the final gainful employment regulations which have a general effective date of July 1, 2024. See Part I, Item 1. “Business - Regulatory Environment - Gainful Employment.” On October 31, 2023, the DOE published final regulations regarding financial responsibility, administrative capability, certification standards and procedures, and ability to benefit. The regulations have a general effective date of July 1, 2024. See Part I, Item 1. “Business - Regulatory Environment - Financial Responsibility,” “Regulatory Environment - Administrative Capability,” and “Regulatory Environment - Regulation of Federal Student Financial Aid Programs.”
The final regulations impose a broad range of additional requirements on institutions and especially on for-profit institutions like our schools, which increase the possibility that our schools could be subject to additional reporting requirements, potential liabilities and sanctions, and potential loss of Title IV eligibility if our efforts to modify our operations to comply with the new regulations are unsuccessful, which could have a significant impact on our business and results of operations.
The DOE commenced negotiated rulemaking meetings during October through December 2023 aimed at developing new regulations related to providing student debt relief. The meetings are expected to lead to the publication of proposed regulations in 2024 and, after a period of public notice and comment, final regulations. The rulemaking process is in its earliest stages. We cannot predict the timing, content, or potential impact of any final regulations that might emerge from this process.
The DOE also commenced a new negotiated rulemaking process with meetings scheduled for January through March 2024 on several topics including state authorization, accreditation, return of unearned Title IV Program funds for students who withdraw from school without completing their educational programs, cash management, and distance education. See Part I, Item 1. “Business - Regulatory Environment - State Authorization,” “Regulatory Environment - Accreditation,” and “Regulatory Environment - Return of Title IV Program Funds.” The cash management rules if adopted in their proposed forms would, among other things, change the rules for calculating and paying credit balances and late disbursements to students and eliminate the provision allowing institutions to include the cost of books and supplies as part of tuition and fees. The distance education rules if adopted in their proposed forms would, among other things, create a virtual location for institutions that includes all students who are being instructed primarily through distance education and prohibit asynchronous delivery of clock hour distance education programs. If the DOE publishes final regulations by November 1, 2024, the regulations typically would have a general effective date of July 1, 2025. If they are published after November 1, 2024, the regulations typically would have a general effective date of July 1, 2026 or a later date. We cannot predict the ultimate timing, content, and impact of the proposed and final regulations on all of these topics or of any regulations the DOE may propose in the future. Some of the new and proposed regulations are expected to impose a broad range of additional requirements on institutions and especially on for-profit institutions like our schools. In turn, the new and proposed regulations are likely to increase the possibility that our schools could be subject to additional reporting requirements, to potential liabilities and sanctions such as letter of credit amounts, and to potential loss of Title IV eligibility if our efforts to modify our operations to comply with the new regulations are unsuccessful.
Substantial Misrepresentation. The DOE’s regulations prohibit an institution that participates in Title IV Programs from engaging in substantial misrepresentation of the nature of its educational programs, financial charges, graduate employability or its relationship with the DOE. A “misrepresentation” includes any false, erroneous, or misleading statement (whether made in writing, visually, orally, or through other means) that is made by an eligible institution, by one of its representatives, or by a third party that provides to the institution educational programs, marketing, advertising, recruiting, or admissions services and that is made to a student, prospective student, any member of the public, an accrediting or state agency, or to DOE. The DOE defines a “substantial misrepresentation” to include any misrepresentation on which the person to whom it was made could reasonably be expected to rely, or has reasonably relied, to that person’s detriment. The definition of “substantial misrepresentation” is broad and, therefore, it is possible that a statement made by the institution or one of its service providers or representatives could be construed by the DOE to constitute a substantial misrepresentation. If the DOE determines that one of our institutions has engaged in substantial misrepresentation, the DOE may impose sanctions or other conditions upon the institution including, but not limited to, initiating an action to fine the institution or limit, suspend, or terminate its eligibility to participate in the Title IV Programs and may seek to discharge students’ loans and impose liabilities upon the institution. The DOE published final regulations on November 1, 2022 on a variety of topics including, amended and expanded regulations on substantial misrepresentations. Specifically, the new regulations expand the types of conduct that could result in a discharge of student loans including: 1) an expanded list of substantial misrepresentations; 2) a new section regarding substantial omissions of fact; 3) breaches of contract; 4) a new section regarding aggressive and deceptive recruitment; or 5) state or federal judgments or final DOE actions that could result in a borrower defense claim. Some of these forms of conduct also could result in further scrutiny of marketing and recruiting practices by institutions like our schools and could increase the chances of the DOE finding practices to be noncompliant and imposing sanctions based on the alleged noncompliance up to and including fines and potential loss of Title IV eligibility. See Part I, Item 1. “Business - Regulatory Environment - Borrower Defense to Repayment Regulations.”
Index
In March 2022, the DOE published guidance about the enforcement of the requirements regarding substantial misrepresentations. The DOE indicated that it is monitoring complaints and Borrower Defense to Repayment applications from veterans, service members, and their family members who report that personnel and representatives of postsecondary schools suggested during the enrollment process that their military education benefits would cover all of the costs of their program but were told subsequently they would have to take out student loans to finish the program. The DOE stated that it would ensure that institutions engaging in misrepresentations are held accountable if they cause a student to incur extra costs unwittingly or without a full understanding of the implications of borrowing. The DOE also indicated that such students could be entitled to discharge of their student loans and that it would share information and complaints about military-connected students with the DOD and VA for potential agency action.
School Acquisitions/Change of Control. When a company acquires a school that is eligible to participate in Title IV Programs, that school undergoes a change of ownership resulting in a “change of control” as defined by the DOE. Upon such a change of control, a school's eligibility to participate in Title IV Programs is generally suspended until it has applied for recertification by the DOE as an eligible school under its new ownership, which requires that the school also re-establish its state authorization and accreditation. Thus, any plans to expand our business through acquisition of additional schools and have them certified by the DOE to participate in Title IV Programs must take into account the approval requirements of the DOE and the relevant state education agencies and accrediting commissions. The DOE has recently published final regulations with a general effective date of July 1, 2023 concerning change of control which, among other things, expand the requirements applicable to school acquisitions in ways that could make it more difficult to acquire additional schools.
In addition to school acquisitions, other types of transactions can also cause a change of control. The DOE, most state education agencies and our accrediting commissions have standards pertaining to the change of control of schools, but these standards are not uniform. DOE regulations describe some transactions that constitute a change of control, including the transfer of a controlling interest in the voting stock of an institution or the institution's parent corporation. For a publicly traded corporation, DOE regulations provide that a change of control occurs in one of two ways: (a) if a person acquires ownership and control of the corporation so that the corporation is required to file a Current Report on Form 8-K with the Securities and Exchange Commission disclosing the change of control or (b) if the corporation has a shareholder that owns at least 25% of the total outstanding voting stock of the corporation and is the largest shareholder of the corporation, and that shareholder ceases to own at least 25% of such stock or ceases to be the largest shareholder. These standards are subject to interpretation by the DOE. A significant purchase or disposition of our Common Stock could be determined by the DOE to be a change of control under this standard.
Most of the states and our accrediting commissions include the sale of a controlling interest of Common Stock in the definition of a change of control although some agencies could determine that the sale or disposition of a smaller interest would result in a change of control. A change of control under the definition of one of these agencies would require the affected school to reaffirm its state authorization or accreditation. Some agencies would require approval prior to a sale or disposition that would result in a change of control in order to maintain authorization or accreditation. The requirements to obtain such reaffirmation from the states and our accrediting commissions vary widely.
A change of control could occur as a result of future transactions in which the Company or our schools are involved. Some corporate reorganizations and some changes in the Board of Directors of the Company are examples of such transactions. Moreover, the potential adverse effects of a change of control could influence future decisions by us and our shareholders regarding the sale, purchase, transfer, issuance or redemption of our stock. In addition, the adverse regulatory effect of a change of control also could discourage bids for shares of our Common Stock and could have an adverse effect on the market price of our shares.
Opening Additional Schools and Adding Educational Programs. For-profit educational institutions must be authorized by their state education agencies and be fully operational for two years before applying to the DOE to participate in Title IV Programs. However, an institution that is certified to participate in Title IV Programs may establish an additional location and apply to participate in Title IV Programs at that location without reference to the two-year requirement, if such additional location satisfies all other applicable DOE eligibility requirements. Our strategic plans for future expansion are based, in part, on our ability to open new schools as additional locations of our existing institutions and take into account the applicable approval requirements of the DOE and our other regulatory agencies.
A student may use Title IV Program funds only to pay the costs associated with enrollment in an eligible educational program offered by an institution participating in Title IV Programs. Generally, unless otherwise required by the DOE or by DOE regulations, an institution that is eligible to participate in Title IV Programs may add a new educational program without DOE approval. However, institutions that are provisionally certified may be required to obtain approval of new educational programs. Our institutions are provisionally certified and required to obtain prior DOE approval of new locations and of new educational programs. If an institution erroneously determines that an educational program is eligible for purposes of Title IV Programs, the institution would likely be liable for repayment of Title IV Program funds provided to students in that educational program. Our expansion plans are based, in part, on our ability to add new educational programs at our existing schools.
Index
Some of the state education agencies and our accrediting commission also have requirements that may affect our schools' ability to open a new campus, establish an additional location of an existing institution or begin offering a new educational program. The DOE has published final regulations that further restrict the ability of some schools - such as schools that are provisionally certified - to add new locations or educational programs, which could impact our ability to make such changes if we are provisionally certified or subject to other criteria in the regulations.
Closed School Loan Discharges. The DOE may grant closed school loan discharges of federal student loans based upon applications by qualified students. The DOE also may initiate discharges on its own for students who have not reenrolled in another Title IV Program eligible school within three years after the closure and who attended campuses that closed on or after November 1, 2013, as did some of our former campuses. If the DOE discharges some or all of these loans, the DOE may seek to recover the cost of the loan discharges from us. As noted above, the DOE published final regulations on November 1, 2022 with a general effective date of July 1, 2023 on a variety of topics, including closed school loan discharges (and, among other things, the reintroduction of automatic closed school loan discharges), which will make it easier for borrowers to obtain discharges of their loans and for the DOE to recover liabilities from institutions. We cannot predict with certainty any additional closed school loan discharges that the DOE may approve or the liabilities that the DOE may seek from us for campuses that have closed in the past or any possible school closures in the future.
Administrative Capability. The DOE assesses the administrative capability of each institution that participates in Title IV Programs under a series of separate standards. Failure to satisfy any of the standards may lead the DOE to find the institution ineligible to participate in Title IV Programs or to place the institution on provisional certification as a condition of its participation. These criteria require, among other things, that the institution:
•
comply with all applicable federal student financial aid requirements;
•
have capable and sufficient personnel to administer the federal student Title IV Programs;
•
administer Title IV Programs with adequate checks and balances in its system of internal controls over financial reporting;
•
divide the function of authorizing and disbursing or delivering Title IV Program funds so that no office has the responsibility for both functions;
•
establish and maintain records required under the Title IV Program regulations;
•
develop and apply an adequate system to identify and resolve discrepancies in information from sources regarding a student’s application for financial aid under the Title IV Program;
•
have acceptable methods of defining and measuring the satisfactory academic progress of its students;
•
refer to the Office of the Inspector General any credible information indicating that any applicant, student, employee, third party servicer or other agent of the school has been engaged in any fraud or other illegal conduct involving Title IV Programs;
•
not be, and not have any principal or affiliate who is, debarred or suspended from federal contracting or engaging in activity that is cause for debarment or suspension;
•
provide adequate financial aid counseling to its students;
•
submit in a timely manner all reports and financial statements required by the Title IV Program regulations; and
•
not otherwise appear to lack administrative capability.
The DOE has placed three of our institutions on provisional certification based on findings in recent audits of the institutions’ Title IV compliance that the DOE alleges identified deficiencies in regulations related to DOE regulations regarding an institution’s level of administrative capability. See Part I. Item 1. “Business - Regulatory Environment - Regulation of Federal Student Financial Aid Programs.”
The DOE published final regulations on October 31, 2023 that, among other issues, expand the scope of the administrative capability regulations to include other requirements (such as, for example, providing adequate financial aid counseling and career services, ensuring the availability of clinical and externship opportunities, the disbursement of Title IV funds in a timely manner, compliance with high school diploma requirements, preventing substantial misrepresentations, complying with gainful employment requirements, and avoiding significant negative actions with a federal, state, or accrediting agency). The regulations have a general effective date of July 1, 2024. Failure by us to satisfy any of these or other administrative capability criteria could cause our institutions to be subject to sanctions or other actions by the DOE including the loss of eligibility to participate in Title IV Programs, which would have a significant impact on our business and results of operations.
Index
Restrictions on Payment of Commissions, Bonuses and Other Incentive Payments. An institution participating in Title IV Programs may not provide any commission, bonus or other incentive payment based directly or indirectly on success in securing enrollments or financial aid to any person or entity engaged in any student recruiting or admission activities or in making decisions regarding the awarding of Title IV Program funds. The DOE’s regulations established 12 “safe harbors” identifying types of compensation that may be paid without violating the incentive compensation rule. On October 29, 2010, the DOE adopted final rules that took effect on July 1, 2011 and amended the incentive compensation rule by, among other things, eliminating the 12 safe harbors (thereby reducing the scope of permissible compensatory payments under the rule) and expanding the scope of compensatory payments and employees subject to the rule. We cannot predict how the DOE will interpret and enforce the revised incentive compensation rule and the limited published guidance that the DOE has provided, nor how it will apply the rule and guidance to our past, present, and future compensation practices. The implementation of the final regulations required us to change our compensation practices and has had and will continue to have a significant impact on the productivity of our employees, on the retention of our employees and on our business and results of operations.
Compliance with Regulatory Standards and Effect of Regulatory Violations. Our schools are subject to audits, program reviews, site visits, and other reviews by various federal and state regulatory agencies, including, but not limited to, the DOE, the DOE’s Office of Inspector General (“OIG”), state education agencies and other state regulators, the VA and other federal agencies (such as, for example, the FTC or the CFPB), and by our accrediting commissions. In addition, each of our institutions must retain an independent certified public accountant to conduct an annual compliance audit of the institution’s administration of Title IV Program funds. The institution must submit the resulting annual compliance audit report to the DOE for review. The annual compliance audit reports for our institutions contain findings on topics that were the subject of findings in prior audits although the amount of questioned funds in the reports are immaterial. The reoccurrence of findings in our compliance audit reports could result in the DOE initiating an adverse action against one or more of our institutions. Significant violations of Title IV Program requirements by any of our institutions could become the basis for the DOE to impose liabilities on us or initiate an adverse action to limit, suspend, terminate, revoke, or decline to renew the participation of the affected institution in Title IV Programs or to seek civil or criminal penalties. Generally, a termination of Title IV Program eligibility extends for 18 months before the institution may apply for reinstatement of its participation. Some of the findings in the annual Title IV Program compliance audits for some of our institutions resulted in the DOE placing those institutions on provisional certification. See Part I. Item 1. “Business - Regulatory Environment - Regulation of Federal Student Financial Aid Programs.”
If one of our schools fails to comply with accrediting or state licensing requirements, such school and its main and/or branch campuses could be subject to the loss of state licensure or accreditation, which in turn could result in a loss of eligibility to participate in Title IV Programs. If the DOE or another agency determined that one of our institutions improperly disbursed Title IV Program funds or violated a provision of the HEA or DOE regulations, the institution could be required to repay such funds and related costs to the DOE and lenders, and could be assessed an administrative fine. The DOE could also place the institution on provisional certification status and/or transfer the institution to the reimbursement or cash monitoring system of receiving Title IV Program funds, under which an institution must disburse its own funds to students and document the students' eligibility for Title IV Program funds before receiving such funds from the DOE. See Part I, Item 1. “Business - Regulatory Environment - Financial Responsibility Standards.”
Consumer Protection Laws and Scrutiny of the For-Profit Postsecondary Education Sector. As a post-secondary educational institution, we are subject to a broad range of consumer protection and other laws, such as recruiting, marketing, the protection of personal information, student financing and payment servicing, enforced by federal agencies such as the FTC and CFPB and various state agencies and state attorneys general. We devote significant effort to complying with state and federal consumer protection laws. In recent years, Congress, the DOE, state legislatures and regulatory agencies, accrediting agencies, the CFPB, the FTC, the SEC, the Department of Justice, state attorneys general and the media have scrutinized the for-profit postsecondary education sector. Congressional hearings and other inquiries have occurred regarding various aspects of the education industry, including issues surrounding student debt as well as publicly reported student outcomes that may be used as part of an institution’s recruiting and admissions practices, and reports have been issued that are highly critical of for-profit colleges and universities.
On October 6, 2021, the FTC issued an announcement regarding its intentions to target false claims by for-profit colleges on topics such as promises about graduates’ job and earnings prospects and other outcomes, to impose “significant financial penalties” on violators, and to monitor the market carefully with federal and state partners. The FTC indicated in the announcement that it had put 70 for-profit higher education institutions on notice that the agency would be “cracking down” on any such false promises. All of our institutions were among the 70 institutions who received this notice. Although the FTC stated that a school’s presence on the list of 70 institutions does not reflect any assessment as to whether they have engaged in deceptive or unfair conduct, the FTC’s announcement and its issuance of notices to schools could lead to further scrutiny, investigations, and potential attempted enforcement actions by the FTC and other regulators against for-profit schools, including our schools.
On October 8, 2021, the DOE announced the establishment of an Office of Enforcement within the Federal Student Aid Office that oversees institutions participating in Title IV programs. The office will be comprised of four existing divisions, including the Administrative Actions and Appeals Services Group (which, among other things, initiates adverse actions against institutions), the Borrower Defense Group (which analyzes Borrower Defense to Repayment claims), the Investigations Group (which evaluates and investigates potential institutional noncompliance and collaborates with other federal and state regulators), and the Resolution and Referral Management Group (which tracks and resolves referrals, allegations and complaints about institutions and other parties that participate in the Title IV programs). The establishment of the Office of Enforcement could result in an increase in enforcement actions and other activities against for-profit schools and school companies, including us.
Index
In addition to Title IV Programs and other government-administered programs, all of our schools offer extended financing programs to their students. This extension of credit helps fill the gap between what the student receives from all financial aid sources and what the student may need to cover the full cost of his or her education. Students or their parents can apply to a number of different unaffiliated lenders for this funding at current market interest rates. In such regard, we are required to comply with applicable federal and state laws related to certain consumer and educational loans and credit extensions, which may be subject to the supervisory authority of the CFPB.
Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (“CARES”). In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, in 2020, the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (the “CARES Act”) was signed into law, providing a $2.0 trillion federal economic relief package of financial assistance and other relief to individuals and businesses impacted by the pandemic.
Among other things, the CARES Act includes a $14 billion Higher Education Emergency Relief Fund (“HEERF”) funds for the DOE to distribute directly to institutions of higher education. The DOE has allocated funds to each institution of higher education based on a formula contained in the CARES Act. The formula is heavily weighted toward institutions with large numbers of Pell Grant recipients. The DOE allocated $27.4 million to our schools distributed in two equal installments and required them to be utilized by April 30, 2021 and May 14, 2021, respectively. The Company has distributed the full $13.7 million of its first installment as emergency grants to students and has utilized the full $13.7 million of its second installment. If the funds are not spent or accounted for in accordance with applicable requirements, we could be required to return funds or be subject to other sanctions. See Part I, Item 1. “Business - Regulatory Environment - Compliance with Regulatory Standards and Effect of Regulatory Violations.”
Coronavirus Response and Relief Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2021 (“CRRSAA”) and ARPA. On December 27, 2020, the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021 was signed into law. This annual appropriations bill contained the CRRSAA. which provided an additional $81.9 billion to the Education Stabilization Fund including $22.7 billion for the HEERF, which were originally created by the CARES Act in March 2020. The higher education provisions of the CRRSAA are intended in part to provide additional financial assistance benefitting students and their postsecondary institutions in the wake of the spread of COVID-19 across the country and its impact on higher educational institutions. In March 2021, the $1.9 trillion American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 (“ARPA”) was signed into law. Among other things, the ARPA provides $40 billion in relief funds that will go directly to colleges and universities with $395.8 million going to for-profit institutions. The DOE allocated a total of $24.4 million to our schools from the funds made available under CRRSAA and ARPA. As of December 31, 2022, the Company has drawn down and distributed to our students $14.8 million of these allocated funds. The availability of the remainder of the funds has expired as of June 30, 2023, and the Company will no longer have access to such funds. Failure to comply with requirements for the usage and reporting of these funds could result in requirements to repay some or all of the allocated funds and in other sanctions.

---

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
Item 1A.
RISK FACTORS
The risk factors described below and other information included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K are among the numerous risks faced by our Company and should be carefully considered before deciding to invest in, sell or retain shares of our Common Stock. These are factors that, individually or in the aggregate, could cause our actual results to differ materially from expected and historical results and the risks and uncertainties described below are not the only ones we face. Investors should understand that it is not possible to predict or identify all such risks and, as such, should not consider the following to be a complete discussion of all potential risks and uncertainties that may affect the Company. Investors should consider carefully the risks and uncertainties described below in addition to other information contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, including our Consolidated Financial Statements and related notes.
RISKS RELATED TO OUR INDUSTRY
Our failure to comply with the extensive regulatory requirements applicable to our participation in Title IV Programs and our school operations could result in financial penalties, restrictions on our operations and loss of external financial aid funding, which could affect our revenues and impose significant operating restrictions upon us.
Our industry is highly regulated by federal and state governmental agencies and by accrediting commissions. The various regulatory agencies applicable to our business periodically revise their requirements and modify their interpretations of existing requirements and restrictions. We cannot predict with certainty how any of these regulatory requirements will be applied or whether each of our schools will be able to comply with such revised requirements in the future. Given the complex nature of the regulations and the fact that they are subject to interpretation, it is reasonable to conclude that in the conduct of our business, we may inadvertently violate such regulations. In particular, the HEA and DOE regulations specify extensive criteria and numerous standards that an institution must satisfy to establish to participate in the Title IV Programs. For a description of these federal, state, and accrediting agency criteria, see Part I, Item 1. “Business - Regulatory Environment.”
Index
If we are found to have not satisfied the HEA or the DOE's requirements for Title IV Programs funding, one or more of our institutions, including its additional locations, could be limited in its access to, or lose, Title IV Program funding, which could adversely affect our revenue, as we received approximately 81% of our revenue (calculated based on cash receipts) from Title IV Programs during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023, and have a significant impact on our business and results of operations. If we or any of our schools fail to comply with applicable federal, state, or accrediting agency requirements, our regulators could take a variety of adverse actions against us, and our schools could be subject to, among other things, a) the loss of, or placement of material restrictions or conditions on (i) state licensure or accreditation, (ii) eligibility to participate in and receive funds under the Title IV Programs or other federal or state financial assistance programs, or (iii) capacity to grant degrees, diplomas and certificates or b) the imposition of liabilities or monetary penalties, any of which could have a material adverse effect on academic or operational initiatives, revenues or financial condition, and impose significant operating restrictions upon us. See Part I, Item 1. “Business - Regulatory Environment - Compliance with Regulatory Standards and Effect of Regulatory Violations” and “Business - Regulatory Environment - Other Financial Assistance Programs.”
If we fail to demonstrate “administrative capability” to the DOE, our business could suffer.
DOE regulations specify extensive criteria an institution must satisfy to establish that it has the requisite “administrative capability” to participate in Title IV Programs, and the DOE recently published new regulations that expand the number and scope of these criteria. For a description of these criteria, see Part I, Item 1. “Business - Regulatory Environment - Administrative Capability.”
If we are found not to have satisfied the DOE’s “administrative capability” requirements, or to have otherwise failed to comply with one or more DOE requirements, one or more of our institutions and its additional locations could be limited in its access to, or lose, Title IV Program funding. This could adversely affect our revenue, as we received approximately 81% of our revenue (calculated based on cash receipts) from Title IV Programs in 2023, which would have a significant impact on our business and results of operations. The DOE has placed all of our institutions on provisional certification based on findings in recent audits of the institutions’ Title IV compliance that the DOE alleges identified deficiencies in regulations related to DOE regulations regarding an institutions’ level of administrative capability. See Part I, Item 1. “Business - Regulatory Environment - Regulation of Federal Student Financial Aid Programs.”
Congress and the DOE may make changes to the laws and regulations applicable to, or reduce funding for, Title IV Programs, which could reduce our student population, revenues or profit margin.
Congress periodically revises the HEA and other laws governing Title IV Programs and annually determines the funding level for each Title IV Program. We cannot predict what, if any, legislative or other actions will be taken or proposed by Congress in connection with the reauthorization of the HEA or other such activities of Congress, although Congress recently made a change to the 90/10 Rule that will make it harder for schools like ours that are subject to the rule to comply with the rule. See Part I, Item 1. “Business - Regulatory Environment - Congressional Action.” Because a significant percentage of our revenues is derived from the Title IV Programs, any action by Congress or the DOE that significantly reduces funding for Title IV Programs or that limits the ability of our schools, programs, or students to receive funding through such programs or that imposes new restrictions upon our business or operations could reduce our student enrollment and our revenues, increase our administrative costs, require us to arrange for alternative sources of financial aid for our students, and require us to modify our practices in order to fully comply. In addition, current requirements for Title IV Program participation may change or the present Title IV Programs could be replaced by other programs with materially different eligibility requirements. The potential for changes that may be adverse to us and other for-profit schools like ours may increase as a result of changes in political leadership. The DOE continues to engage in a process to establish new regulations that have increased, and will continue to increase, the number and scope of regulatory requirements applicable to our schools. See Part I, Item 1. “Business - Regulatory Environment - Negotiated Rulemaking.” If we cannot comply with the provisions of the HEA and the regulations of the DOE, as they may be revised, or if the cost of such compliance is excessive, or if funding is materially reduced, our revenues or profit margin could be materially adversely affected.
We could be subject to liabilities, letter of credit requirements, and other sanctions under the DOE’s Borrower Defense to Repayment regulations.
The DOE’s current Borrower Defense to Repayment regulations establish processes for borrowers to receive from the DOE a discharge of the obligation to repay certain Title IV Program loans based on certain acts or omissions by the institution or a covered party. The current regulations also establish processes for the DOE to seek recovery from the institution of the amount of discharged loans. The regulations regarding Borrower Defense to Repayment and regarding closed school loan discharges are extensive and generally make it easier for borrowers to obtain discharges of student loans and for the DOE to assess liabilities and other sanctions on institutions based on the loan discharges. The implementation and enforcement of these Borrower Defense to Repayment and closed school loan discharge regulations could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations. See Part I, Item 1. “Business - Regulatory Environment - Borrower Defense to Repayment Regulations” and “Business - Regulatory Environment - Closed School Loan Discharges.”
Index
The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California (Sweet v. Cardona, No. 3:19-cv-3674 (N.D. Cal.)) has approved a class action settlement that could result in the granting of all borrower defense applications submitted to the DOE concerning our institutions and, potentially, could lead to the DOE seeking recoupment from us of all loan amounts in the granted applications, even though we have appealed the District Court’s judgment approving the settlement.
On June 22, 2022, the plaintiff student loan borrowers in a class action against the DOE in federal court in California (Sweet v. Cardona, No. 3:19-cv-3674 (N.D. Cal.)) and the DOE announced a proposed settlement agreement to resolve claims that the DOE has failed to timely decide Borrower Defense to Repayment applications submitted to the DOE. The proposed settlement included three categories of relief for student loan borrowers. First, it set forth a list of approximately 150 institutions, including Lincoln Technical Institute and Lincoln College of Technology, and, under the settlement, the DOE would agree to discharge loans and refund prior loan payments to class members with loan debt associated with an institution on the list (which includes Lincoln institutions). The class action plaintiffs and the DOE stated that the DOE had determined that attendance at one of the listed institutions justifies presumptive relief allegedly based on strong indicia regarding substantial misconduct by the institutions, whether credibly alleged or in some instances proven, and the purportedly high rate of class members with applications related to the listed schools. Second, the proposed settlement included new procedures for DOE to resolve pending borrower defense claims associated with other schools not on the list. Third, for any student loan borrower who submitted a borrower defense application after June 22, 2022 and before the final approval of the settlement, the proposed settlement would require the DOE to review the applications under the DOE’s 2016 regulatory standards and issue decisions within 36 months, or else the applications would be discharged in full.
At the time the plaintiffs and DOE announced the proposed settlement, Lincoln was not a party to the lawsuit and none of the named plaintiffs had attended a Lincoln institution. In August 2022, Lincoln and three other schools were granted permission to intervene in the lawsuit to protect their interests in the finalization and implementation of any settlement agreement the court might approve. In October 2022, the four intervening schools, including Lincoln, filed objections to the final approval of the settlement, asserting reputational harms from the schools’ inclusion on the settlement’s list of schools and denial of schools’ due process rights under the DOE’s borrower defense regulations.
On November 16, 2022, the federal district court overruled the four schools’ objections and approved the settlement as proposed. As a result of this final approval, the DOE has estimated that approximately 196,000 student loan borrowers who attended one of the listed schools (including Lincoln institutions) will receive automatic student loan discharges; that another approximately 100,000 student loan borrowers who attended other schools not on the list would receive decisions under new procedures; and that approximately 250,000 student loan borrowers who submitted borrower defense applications between June 22, 2022 and November 16, 2022 would receive decisions under the DOE’s 2016 regulatory standards within 36 months or else receive automatic student loan discharges.
On January 13, 2023, Lincoln appealed the settlement’s final approval to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Two of the three other intervenor schools also appealed on the same date. The three appealing schools also sought to stay the implementation of the settlement while their appeals were being decided, but the requested stay was denied by the district court, the Ninth Circuit, and the U.S. Supreme Court. As a result, the DOE is implementing the settlement relief while the three schools appeal the settlement’s final approval.
Lincoln and the two other appealing schools filed their opening appellate brief in the Ninth Circuit on May 3, 2023. The plaintiffs and the DOE filed their opposition appellate briefs on August 2, 2023. Lincoln and the two other appealing schools filed their reply appellate brief on September 22, 2023. The Ninth Circuit heard oral argument on December 5, 2023, and is currently considering the appeal.
It is not possible at this time to predict whether the settlement will be upheld on appeal, what actions the DOE might take if the settlement is upheld on appeal, or whether the DOE or other agencies might take actions against Lincoln institutions before the appeal is decided. Such actions could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations. Even if the Ninth Circuit rules in our favor and if the approval of the settlement is overturned, the DOE already may have discharged by that time the loans associated with some or all of the pending applications. We have seen evidence that the DOE already may have discharged some of the loans associated with some of the pending applications, but the DOE has not furnished definitive data to us necessary to determine the extent to which applications have been granted. The DOE may or may not attempt to seek recoupment from applicable schools relating to approval of borrower defense applications. The settlement also requires the DOE to review and decide borrower defense applications submitted after June 22, 2022 and before November 16, 2022 within 36 months of the final settlement date. If the DOE grants some or all of these applications, the DOE also could attempt to recoup from us the loan amounts relating to these applications. If the DOE approves borrower defense applications concerning us and attempts to recoup from us the loan amounts in the approved applications, we would consider our options for challenging the legal and factual bases for such actions.
We cannot predict what other actions the DOE might take if the settlement is fully implemented, including the amount of borrower defense applications that the DOE might grant or the amount of any recoupment that the DOE might seek from us, if any. We also cannot predict the outcome of any challenges we might make to such actions.
The DOE’s Gainful Employment regulations could have a significant impact on our business and results of operations.
On October 10, 2023, the DOE published final gainful employment regulations on October 10, 2023 which have a general effective date of July 1, 2024 and which establish rules for annually evaluating each of our educational programs based on the calculation of debt-to-earnings rates (an annual debt-to-earnings rate and a discretionary debt-to-earnings rate) and a median earnings measure under complex regulatory formulas outlined in the regulations. See Part I, Item 1. “Business - Regulatory Environment - Gainful Employment.” If one or more of our educational programs were to yield debt-to-earnings rates or a median earnings measure that do not comply with regulatory benchmarks for two of three consecutive years, we would lose Title IV eligibility for each of the impacted educational programs. The regulations will also require us to provide warnings to current and prospective students for programs in danger of losing of Title IV eligibility (which could deter prospective students from enrolling and current students from continuing their respective programs). The regulations also include provisions for providing certifications and reporting data to the DOE and providing required student disclosures related to gainful employment.
Index
The regulations include gainful employment rates and measures that will be based in part on data that is not readily accessible to us and other institutions, which make it difficult for us to predict with certainty how our educational programs will perform under the new gainful employment benchmarks and the extent to which certain programs could become ineligible for Title IV participation. The DOE released performance data at the time it published the proposed regulations that calculates rates for each school’s program while acknowledging that the methodology used to produce the calculations differs from the methodology in the proposed regulations due to limitations in data availability. Because we do not have access to all of the data that will ultimately be used under the regulations to evaluate our programs and the DOE has not made this data available, we cannot predict whether, or the extent to which, our programs could fail to comply with the new gainful employment benchmarks. Moreover, we do not have control over some of the factors that could impact the rates and measures for our programs which will limit our ability to eliminate or mitigate the impact of the regulations on us and our educational programs. The DOE announced at the time it released the final gainful employment regulations that the first official outcome rates will be published in early 2025 and that programs that fail the same gainful employment metric in the first two years the rates are issued will become ineligible in 2026.
The implementation of new gainful employment regulations could require us to eliminate or modify certain educational programs, could result in the loss of our students’ access to Title IV Program funds for the affected programs, and could have a significant impact on the rate at which students enroll in our programs and on our business and results of operations.
The DOE has changed its regulations, and may make other changes in the future, in a manner which could require us to incur additional costs in connection with our administration of Title IV Programs, affect our ability to remain eligible to participate in Title IV Programs, impose restrictions on our participation in Title IV Programs, affect the rate at which students enroll in our programs, or otherwise have a significant impact on our business and results of operations.
The DOE periodically issues new regulations and guidance that can have an adverse effect on our institutions. We cannot predict the timing and content of any new regulations or guidance that the DOE may seek to impose or whether and to what extent the DOE may issue new regulations and guidance that could adversely impact for-profit schools including our institutions. The DOE recently published new regulations on a variety of topics with a general effective date of July 1, 2024 and is currently engaged in additional rulemaking processes in 2024 that are expected to result in new regulations on a broad range of topics that could adversely impact institutions including our institutions. See Part I, Item 1. “Business - Regulatory Environment - Negotiated Rulemaking.”
If we cannot comply with the provisions of these or other regulations, as they currently exist or may be revised, or if the cost of such compliance is excessive, or if funding is materially reduced, our revenues or profit margin could be materially adversely affected.
We cannot predict how the DOE would interpret and enforce current or future regulations or how these regulations, or any regulations that may arise out of a negotiated rulemaking process or any other regulations that DOE may promulgate, may impact our schools’ participation in Title IV Programs; however, current or future regulations could have a material adverse effect on our schools’ business and results of operations, and the broad sweep of the recent rules and the rules that the DOE is currently developing may, in the future, require our schools to submit a letter of credit based on expanded standards of financial responsibility.
If we or our eligible institutions do not meet the financial responsibility standards prescribed by the DOE, we may be required to post letters of credit or our eligibility to participate in Title IV Programs could be terminated or limited, which could significantly reduce our student population and revenues.
To participate in Title IV Programs, an eligible institution must satisfy specific measures of financial responsibility prescribed by the DOE or post a letter of credit in favor of the DOE and possibly accept other conditions on its participation in Title IV Programs. The DOE published new regulations that established expanded standards of financial responsibility, which could result in a requirement that we submit to the DOE a substantial letter of credit or other form of financial protection in an amount determined by the DOE, and be subject to other conditions and requirements, based on any one of an extensive list of triggering circumstances. See Part I, Item 1. “Business - Regulatory Environment - Financial Responsibility Standards.” Any obligation to post one or more letters of credit would increase our costs of regulatory compliance. Our inability to obtain a required letter of credit or limitations on, or termination or revocation of, our participation in Title IV Programs could limit our students’ access to various government-sponsored student financial aid programs, which could significantly reduce our student population and revenues.
Index
We are subject to fines and other sanctions if we make incentive payments to individuals involved in certain recruiting, admissions or financial aid activities, which could increase our cost of regulatory compliance and adversely affect our results of operations.
An institution participating in Title IV Programs may not provide any commission, bonus or other incentive payment based directly or indirectly on success in enrolling students or securing financial aid to any person involved in any student recruiting or admission activities or in making decisions regarding the awarding of Title IV Program funds. See Part I, Item 1. “Business - Regulatory Environment -- Restrictions on Payment of Commissions, Bonuses and Other Incentive Payments.” We cannot predict how the DOE will interpret and enforce the incentive compensation rule and the limited published guidance that the DOE has provided, nor how it will apply the rule and guidance to our past, present, and future compensation practices. These regulations have had and may continue to have a significant impact on the rate at which students enroll in our programs and on our business and results of operations. If we are found to have violated this law, we could be fined or otherwise sanctioned by the DOE or we could face litigation filed under the qui tam provisions of the Federal False Claims Act.
If our schools do not maintain their state licensure and accreditation, they may not participate in Title IV Programs, which could adversely affect our student population and revenues.
An institution must be accredited by an accrediting commission recognized by the DOE and by applicable state educational agencies in order to participate in Title IV Programs. See Part I, Item 1. “Business - Regulatory Environment - State Authorization” and “Business - Regulatory Environment - Accreditation.” If any of our schools fail to comply with accrediting or state requirements, the institution and its main and/or branch campuses are subject to the loss of accreditation or state authorization or may be placed on probation or a special monitoring or reporting status which, if the noncompliance with accrediting commission requirements is not resolved, could result in loss of accreditation. If the DOE declines to continue its recognition of ACCSC in the future and if the subsequent period for obtaining accreditation from another DOE-recognized accrediting agency lapses before we obtain accreditation from another DOE-recognized accrediting agency (or if the DOE does not provide such a period for institutions to obtain other accreditation), our schools could lose their Title IV eligibility. Loss of accreditation by any of our main campuses would result in the termination of that school’s eligibility and all of its branch campuses to participate in Title IV Programs and could cause us to close the school and its branches, which could have a significant adverse impact on our business and operations.
More recently, the DOE commenced a negotiated rulemaking process in January 2024 on a number of topics including amendments to the regulations on accreditation and state authorization The proposals currently under discussion include amended regulations regarding the standards relating to the DOE’s recognition of accrediting agencies and using a risk-based approach for prioritizing DOE review of accreditors which could lead to heightened scrutiny of certain accreditors including our institutional accrediting body, ACCSC. The proposals also include rules that would require accreditors to take action more quickly when they identify areas of noncompliance and limit the amount of time can be out of compliance with accreditor standards. The proposals also would require accreditors to strengthen their standards for the review of substantive changes in certain circumstances which could increase the level of accreditor scrutiny of substantive changes at our schools. See Part I, Item 1. “Business - Regulatory Environment - Accreditation” and “Regulatory Environment - State Authorization.”
Programmatic accreditation is the process through which specific programs are reviewed and approved by industry- and program-specific accrediting entities. Although programmatic accreditation is not generally necessary for Title IV Program eligibility, such accreditation may be required to allow students to sit for certain licensure exams or to work in a particular profession or career or to meet other requirements. Failure to obtain or maintain such programmatic accreditation may lead to a decline in enrollments in such programs.
Our institutions would lose eligibility to participate in Title IV Programs if the percentage of their revenues derived from those programs exceeds 90%, which could reduce our student population and revenues.
A proprietary institution that derives more than 90% of its total revenue from Title IV Programs for two consecutive fiscal years becomes immediately ineligible to participate in Title IV Programs and may not reapply for eligibility until the end of at least two fiscal years. An institution with revenues exceeding 90% for a single fiscal year will be placed on provisional certification and may be subject to other enforcement measures.
In March 2021, the ARPA amended the 90/10 Rule by treating other “federal funds that are disbursed or delivered to or on behalf of a student to be used to attend such institution” in the same way as Title IV funds are currently treated in the 90/10 Rule calculation. See Part I, Item 1. “Business - Regulatory Environment - 90/10 Rule.” The ARPA states that the amendments to the 90/10 Rule apply to institutional fiscal years beginning on or after January 1, 2023 and are subject to the HEA’s negotiated rulemaking process. The DOE published new final 90/10 Rule regulations on October 28, 2022 with a general effective date of July 1, 2023. The 90/10 Rule regulations could have a materially adverse effect on us and other schools like ours. See Part I, Item 1. “Business - Regulatory Environment - 90/10 Rule” and “Business - Regulatory Environment - Negotiated Rulemaking.” We cannot be certain that the changes we make to our operations in the future to address the new 90/10 Rule regulations will succeed in maintaining our institutions’ 90/10 Rule percentages below required levels or that the changes will not materially impact our business operations, revenues, and operating costs. It also is possible that Congress or the DOE could amend the 90/10 Rule in the future to lower the 90% threshold, change the calculation methodology, or make other changes to the 90/10 Rule that could make it more difficult for our institutions to comply with the 90/10 Rule. If any of our institutions loses eligibility to participate in Title IV Programs, that loss would also adversely affect our students’ access to various government-sponsored student financial aid programs, and would have a significant impact on the rate at which our students enroll in our programs and on our business and results of operations.
Index
Our institutions would lose eligibility to participate in Title IV Programs if their former students defaulted on repayment of their federal student loans in excess of specified levels, which could reduce our student population and revenues.
An institution may lose its eligibility to participate in some or all Title IV Programs if the rates at which the institution's current and former students default on their federal student loans exceed specified percentages. See Part I, Item 1. “Business - Regulatory Environment - Student Loan Defaults.” If former students defaulted on repayment of their federal student loans in excess of specified levels, our institutions would lose eligibility to participate in Title IV Programs, would also adversely affect our students’ access to various government-sponsored student financial aid programs, and would have a significant impact on the rate at which our students enroll in our programs and on our business and results of operations.
We are subject to sanctions if we fail to correctly calculate and timely return Title IV Program funds for students who withdraw before completing their educational programs, which could increase our cost of regulatory compliance and decrease our profit margin.
An institution participating in Title IV Programs must correctly calculate the amount of unearned Title IV Program funds that have been credited to students who withdraw from their educational programs before completing them and must return those unearned funds in a timely manner, generally within 45 days of such student’s withdrawal. If the unearned funds are not properly calculated and timely returned, we may have to post a letter of credit in favor of the DOE or may be otherwise sanctioned by the DOE, which could increase our cost of regulatory compliance and adversely affect our results of operations. Based upon the findings of an annual Title IV Program compliance audit of our Columbia and Iselin institutions, we are required to maintain a letter of credit in the amount of $600,020 to the DOE. More recently, the DOE is engaged in a negotiated rulemaking process on a number of topics including plans to amend the regulations on the requirements for institutions to return unearned Title IV funds to students who withdraw from their educational programs before completing them. We cannot predict the ultimate timing, content or impact of any regulations that the DOE might publish on this topic. See Part I, Item 1. “Business - Regulatory Environment - Return of Title IV Program Funds.”
We are subject to sanctions if we fail to comply with the DOE’s regulations regarding prohibitions against substantial misrepresentations, which could increase our cost of regulatory compliance and decrease our profit margin.
The DOE’s regulations prohibit an institution that participates in the Title IV Programs from engaging in substantial misrepresentation of the nature of its educational programs, financial charges, graduate employability or its relationship with the DOE. The DOE published final regulations on November 1, 2022 that, among other things, expanded the categories of conduct deemed to be a misrepresentation or substantial omission of fact and that also established new prohibitions on certain types of recruiting tactics and conduct that the DOE deems to be aggressive or deceptive. See Part I, Item 1. “Business - Regulatory Environment - Substantial Misrepresentation.” If the DOE determines that one of our institutions has engaged in substantial misrepresentation or other prohibited conduct, the DOE may impose sanctions or other conditions upon the institution including, but not limited to, initiating an action to fine the institution or limit, suspend, or terminate its eligibility to participate in Title IV Programs and may seek to discharge students’ loans and impose liabilities upon the institution. The regulations also could result in further scrutiny of marketing and recruiting practices by institutions like our schools and could increase the chances of the DOE finding practices to be noncompliant and imposing sanctions based on the alleged noncompliance.
All of our institutions are provisionally certified by the DOE, which may make them more vulnerable to unfavorable DOE action and place additional regulatory burdens on its operations.
All of our institutions are provisionally certified by the DOE. See Part I, Item 1. “Business - Regulatory Environment - Regulation of Federal Student Financial Aid Programs.” The DOE typically places an institution on provisional certification following a change in ownership resulting in a change of control, and may provisionally certify an institution for other reasons including, but not limited to, failure to comply with certain standards of administrative capability or financial responsibility. During the time when an institution is provisionally certified, it may be subject to adverse action with fewer due process rights than those afforded to other institutions. In addition, an institution that is provisionally certified must apply for and receive approval from the DOE for certain substantive changes including, but not limited to, the establishment of an additional location, an increase in the level of academic offerings or the addition of new programs. The DOE published final regulations with a general effective date of July 1, 2024 that, among other issues, establish rules to authorize additional conditions and restrictions on provisionally certified institutions and expand existing regulations regarding administrative capability and financial responsibility. See Part I, Item 1. “Business - Regulatory Environment - Regulation of Federal Student Financial Aid Programs.” Any adverse action by the DOE or increased regulatory burdens as a result of the provisional status of one of our institutions could have a material adverse effect on enrollments and our revenues, financial condition, cash flows and results of operations.
Index
Regulatory agencies or third parties may conduct compliance reviews, bring claims or initiate litigation against us. If the results of these reviews or claims are unfavorable to us, our results of operations and financial condition could be adversely affected.
Because we operate in a highly regulated industry, we are subject to compliance reviews and claims of noncompliance and lawsuits by government agencies and third parties. We may be subject to further reviews related to, among other things, issues of noncompliance identified in recent audits and reviews related to our institutions’ compliance with Title IV Program requirements or related to liabilities for the discharge of loans to certain students who attended campuses of our institutions that are now closed. See Part I, Item 1. “Business - Regulatory Environment - Compliance with Regulatory Standards and Effect of Regulatory Violations.” If the results of these reviews or proceedings are unfavorable to us, or if we are unable to defend successfully against third-party lawsuits or claims, we may be required to pay money damages or be subject to fines, limitations on the operations of our business, loss of federal and state funding, injunctions or other penalties. Even if we adequately address issues raised by an agency review or successfully defend a third-party lawsuit or claim, we may have to divert significant financial and management resources from our ongoing business operations to address issues raised by those reviews or defend those lawsuits or claims. Certain of our institutions are subject to ongoing reviews and proceedings. See Part I, Item 1. “Business - Regulatory Environment - Accreditation,” “Regulatory Environment - Other Financial Assistance Programs,” “Regulatory Environment - Borrower Defense to Repayment,” “Regulatory Environment - Compliance with Regulatory Standards and Effect of Regulatory Violations,” and “Regulatory Environment - Scrutiny of the For-Profit Postsecondary Education Sector.”
Our business could be adversely impacted by additional legislation, regulations, or investigations regarding private student lending because students attending our schools rely on private student loans to pay tuition and other institutional charges.
Our private education loans are subject to regulation and oversight by federal and state regulatory agencies. The CFPB has exercised supervisory authority over private education loan providers. The CFPB has initiated investigations into the lending practices of institutions in the for-profit education sector. Any adverse legislation, regulations, or investigations regarding private student lending could limit the availability of private student loans to our students or lead to sanctions or liabilities, which could have a significant impact on our business and operations.
Changes in the executive branch of our federal government as a result of the outcome of elections or other events could result in further legislation, appropriations, regulations and enforcement actions that could materially or adversely affect our business.
Our industry is subject to an intensive ongoing federal and state regulatory environment that affects our industry. The composition of federal and state executive offices, executive agencies and legislatures that are subject to change based on the results of elections, appointments and other events, may adversely impact our industry through constant changes in that regulatory environment resulting from the disparate views towards the for-profit education industry. See Part I, Item 1. “Business - Regulatory Environment - Scrutiny of the For-Profit Postsecondary Education Sector.” Any laws that are adopted that limit our or our students’ participation in Title IV Programs or in programs to provide funds for active duty service members and veterans or the amount of student financial aid for which our students are eligible, or any decreases in enrollment related to the congressional activity concerning this sector, could have a material adverse effect on our academic or operational initiatives, cash flows, results of operations, or financial condition.
Adverse publicity arising from scrutiny of us or other for-profit postsecondary schools may negatively affect us or our schools.
In recent years, Congress, the DOE, state legislatures, accrediting agencies, the CFPB, the FTC, state attorneys general and the media have scrutinized the for-profit postsecondary education sector. See Part I, Item 1. “Business - Regulatory Environment - Scrutiny of the For-Profit Postsecondary Education Sector.” Adverse publicity regarding any past, pending, or future investigations, claims, settlements, and/or actions against us or other for-profit postsecondary schools could negatively affect our reputation, student enrollment levels, revenue, profit, and/or the market price of our Common Stock. Unresolved investigations, claims, and actions, or adverse resolutions or settlements thereof, could also result in additional inquiries, administrative actions or lawsuits, increased scrutiny, the loss or withholding of accreditation, state licensure, or eligibility to participate in the Title IV Programs or other financial assistance programs, and/or the imposition of other sanctions by federal, state, or accrediting agencies which, individually or in the aggregate, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows and result in the imposition of significant restrictions on us and our ability to operate.
If regulators deny, delay, or condition their approval of transactions involving a change of ownership or control of us or of institutions that we own or acquire, it could have a significant impact on our business and results of operations.
When a company acquires a school that is eligible to participate in Title IV Programs, that school undergoes a change of ownership and control that generally requires approval of the DOE and applicable accrediting and state authorizing agencies to continue to operate and participate in Title IV Programs. See Part I, Item 1. “Business - Regulatory Environment - School Acquisitions/Change of Control.” Thus, any plans to expand our business through acquisition of additional schools and have them certified by the DOE to participate in Title IV Programs must take into account the approval requirements of the DOE and the relevant state education agencies and accrediting commissions.
Index
In addition, a change of control could occur as a result of future transactions in which the Company or our schools are involved and require our schools to obtain approval of the DOE, ACCSC, and the applicable state authorizing agencies to continue operating and participating in Title IV Programs. The DOE, most state education agencies and our accrediting commissions have standards pertaining to the change of control of schools, but these standards are not uniform. DOE regulations describe some transactions that constitute a change of control, including the transfer of a controlling interest in the voting stock of an institution or the institution's parent corporation. Examples of such transactions include but are not limited to a significant purchase or disposition of stock, some corporate reorganizations, and some changes in the Board of Directors of the Company. See Part I, Item 1. “Business - Regulatory Environment - School
Acquisitions/Change of Control.” The potential adverse effects of a change of control could influence future decisions by us and our shareholders regarding the sale, purchase, transfer, issuance or redemption of our stock. In addition, the adverse regulatory effect of a change of control also could discourage bids for shares of our Common Stock and could have an adverse effect on the market price of our shares. The failure to obtain applicable approvals from the DOE and other applicable regulators without delay or material condition in connection with the acquisition of a school or with a change of ownership or control of us or our schools could have a significant impact on our business and results of operations.
If regulators deny, delay, or condition their approval of new locations and educational programs at our schools, it could have a significant impact on our business and results of operations.
Our strategic plans for future expansion are based, in part, on our ability to open new schools as additional locations of our existing institutions, to add new educational programs at our existing schools, and take into account the applicable approval requirements of the DOE and our other regulatory agencies for adding new locations and educational programs. See Part I, Item 1. “Business - Regulatory Environment - Opening Additional Schools and Adding Educational Programs”. Our institutions are provisionally certified and required to obtain prior DOE approval of new locations and of new educational programs. If an institution erroneously determines that an educational program is eligible for purposes of Title IV Programs, the institution would likely be liable for repayment of Title IV Program funds provided to students in that educational program. The failure to obtain applicable approvals from the DOE and other applicable regulators without delay or material condition in connection with the addition of a new location or educational program could have a significant impact on our business and results of operations.
Public health pandemics, epidemics or outbreaks, including the COVID-19 pandemic, could have a material adverse effect on our business and operations.
Public health pandemics, epidemics or outbreaks such as the COVID-19 pandemic and the resulting containment measures to be taken in response to such events have caused and may in the future cause economic and financial disruptions globally. The extent to which any rapidly spreading contagious illness may impact our business and operations will depend on a variety of factors beyond our control, including the actions of governments, businesses and other enterprises in response thereto, the effectiveness of those actions, and vaccine availability, distribution and adoption, all of which cannot be predicted with any level of certainty. We believe that the spread of such illnesses could adversely impact our business and operations, including as a result of workforce limitations and travel restrictions and related government actions. If a significant percentage of our workforce is unable to work, including because of illness or travel or government restrictions in connection with pandemics or disease outbreaks, our operations and enrollment may be negatively impacted. Finally, state and federal regulators, including the DOE, are augmenting existing regulatory processes, waiving others, and overseeing various emergency relief and aid programs. It is highly uncertain how long such regulatory accommodations will continue, or how long and in what amount emergency relief and aid funds will continue to be available. We also cannot predict the types of conditions that may be attached to participation in emergency relief and aid programs, and whether and to what extent compliance with such conditions will be monitored and enforced. If further outbreaks occur and students elect to take a leave of absence, withdraw, or do not make up the required in person labs on a timely basis, our future revenues could be impacted.
RISKS RELATED TO OUR BUSINESS
Our success depends in part on our ability to update and expand the content of existing programs and develop new programs in a cost-effective manner and on a timely basis.
Prospective employers of our graduates increasingly demand that their entry-level employees possess appropriate technological skills. These skills are becoming more sophisticated in line with technological advancements in the automotive, diesel, information technology, and skilled trades. Accordingly, educational programs at our schools must keep pace with those technological advancements. The expansion of our existing programs and the development of new programs may not be accepted by our students, prospective employers or the technical education market. Even if we are able to develop acceptable new programs, we may not be able to introduce these new programs as quickly as our students require or as competitors or employers demand. If we are unable to adequately respond to changes in market requirements due to financial or regulatory constraints, unusually rapid technological changes or other factors, our ability to attract and retain students could be impaired, our placement rates could suffer and our revenues could be adversely affected. In addition, if we are unable to adequately anticipate the requirements of the employers we serve, we may offer programs that do not teach skills useful to prospective employers, which could affect our placement rates and our ability to attract and retain students, causing our revenues to be adversely affected.
Index
Competition could decrease our market share and cause us to lower our tuition rates.
The post-secondary education market is highly competitive. We compete for students and faculty with traditional public and private two-year and four-year colleges and universities and other proprietary schools, many of which have greater financial resources than we do. Some traditional public and private colleges and universities, as well as other private career-oriented schools, offer programs that may be perceived by students to be similar to ours. Most public institutions are able to charge lower tuition than our schools, due in part to government subsidies and other financial resources not available to for-profit schools. Some of our competitors also have substantially greater financial and other resources than we have which may, among other things, allow our competitors to secure strategic relationships with some or all of our existing strategic partners or develop other high profile strategic relationships, or devote more resources to expanding their programs and their school network, or provide greater financing alternatives to their students, all of which could affect the success of our marketing programs. In addition, some of our competitors have a larger network of schools and campuses than we do, enabling them to recruit students more effectively from a wider geographic area. This strong competition could adversely affect our business.
We may be required to reduce tuition or increase spending in response to competition in order to retain or attract students or pursue new market opportunities. As a result, our market share, revenues and operating margin may be decreased. We cannot be sure that we will be able to compete successfully against current or future competitors or that the competitive pressures we face will not adversely affect our revenues and profitability.
Our financial performance depends in part on our ability to continue to develop awareness and acceptance of our programs among high school graduates and working adults looking to return to school.
The awareness of our programs among high school graduates and working adults looking to return to school is critical to the continued acceptance and growth of our programs. Our inability to continue to develop awareness of our programs could reduce our enrollments and impair our ability to increase our revenues or maintain profitability. The following are some of the factors that could prevent us from successfully marketing our programs:
•
student dissatisfaction with our programs and services;
•
diminished access to high school student populations;
•
our failure to maintain or expand our brand or other factors related to our marketing or advertising practices; and
•
our inability to maintain relationships with employers in the automotive, diesel, skilled trades and IT services industries.
An increase in interest rates could adversely affect our ability to attract and retain students.
Our students and their families have benefitted from historic lows on student loan interest rates in recent years. Much of the financing our students receive is tied to floating interest rates. Recently, however, student loan interest rates have been edging higher, making borrowing for education more expensive. Increases in interest rates result in a corresponding increase in the cost to our existing and prospective students of financing their education, which could result in a reduction in the number of students attending our schools and could adversely affect our results of operations and revenues. Higher interest rates could also contribute to higher default rates with respect to our students' repayment of their educational loans. Higher default rates may in turn adversely impact our eligibility for Title IV Program participation or the willingness of private lenders to make private loan programs available to students who attend our schools, which could result in a reduction in our student population.
A substantial decrease in student financing options, or a significant increase in financing costs for our students, could have a significant impact on our student population, revenues and financial results.
The consumer credit markets in the United States have recently suffered from increases in default rates and foreclosures on mortgages. Adverse market conditions for consumer and federally guaranteed student loans could result in providers of alternative loans reducing the attractiveness and/or decreasing the availability of alternative loans to post-secondary students, including students with low credit scores who would not otherwise be eligible for credit-based alternative loans. Prospective students may find that these increased financing costs make borrowing prohibitively expensive and abandon or delay enrollment in post-secondary education programs. Private lenders could also require that we pay them new or increased fees in order to provide alternative loans to prospective students. If any of these scenarios were to occur, our students’ ability to finance their education could be adversely affected and our student population could decrease, which could have a significant impact on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
In addition, any actions by the U.S. Congress or by states that significantly reduce funding for Title IV Programs or other student financial assistance programs, or the ability of our students to participate in these programs, or establish different or more stringent requirements for our schools to participate in those programs, could have a significant impact on our student population, results of operations and cash flows.
Index
We cannot predict our future capital needs, and if we are unable to secure additional financing when needed, our operations and revenues would be adversely affected.
We may need to raise additional capital in the future to fund acquisitions, working capital requirements, expand our markets and program offerings or respond to competitive pressures or perceived opportunities. We cannot be sure that additional financing will be available to us on favorable terms, or at all. If adequate funds are unavailable when required or on acceptable terms, we may be forced to forego attractive acquisition opportunities, or cease operations. Even if we are able to continue our operations, our ability to increase student enrollment and revenues would be adversely affected.
We may not be able to retain our key personnel or hire and retain the personnel we need to sustain and grow our business.
Our success has depended, and will continue to depend, largely on the skills, efforts and motivation of our executive officers who generally have significant experience within the post-secondary education industry. Our success also depends in large part upon our ability to attract and retain highly qualified faculty, school directors, administrators and corporate management. Due to the nature of our business, we face significant competition in the attraction and retention of personnel who possess the skill sets that we seek. In addition, key personnel may leave us and subsequently compete against us. Furthermore, we do not currently carry "key man" life insurance on any of our employees. The loss of the services of any of our key personnel, or our failure to attract and retain other qualified and experienced personnel on acceptable terms, could have an adverse effect on our ability to operate our business efficiently and to execute our growth strategy.
Our total assets include a substantial amount of goodwill. In the event that our schools do not achieve satisfactory operating results, we may be required to write-off a significant portion of the goodwill which would negatively affect our results of operations.
Our total assets reflect substantial amount of goodwill. At December 31, 2023 goodwill associated with our acquisitions decreased to approximately 3.1% from 5.0% of total assets at December 31, 2022. On at least an annual basis, we assess whether there has been an impairment in the value of goodwill. If the carrying value of the tested asset exceeds its estimated fair value, impairment is deemed to have occurred. In this event, the amount is written down to fair value. Under current accounting rules, this would result in a charge to operating earnings. Any determination requiring the write-off of a significant portion of goodwill would negatively affect our results of operations and total capitalization, which could be material. See Part II. Item 8. “Financial Statements and Supplemental Data - Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - Note 7 Goodwill.”
Strikes by our employees may disrupt our ability to hold classes as well as our ability to attract and retain students, which could materially adversely affect our operations. In addition, we contribute to multiemployer benefit plans that could result in liabilities to us if these plans are terminated or we withdraw from them.
As of December 31, 2023, the teaching professionals at six of our campuses are represented by unions and covered by collective bargaining agreements that expire between 2024 and 2026. Although we believe that we have good relationships with these unions and with our employees, any strikes or work stoppages by our employees could adversely impact our relationships with our students, hinder our ability to conduct business and increase costs.
We also contribute to multiemployer pension plans for some employees covered by collective bargaining agreements. These plans are not administered by us, and contributions are determined in accordance with provisions of negotiated labor contracts. The Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended by the Multiemployer Pension Plan Amendments Act of 1980, imposes certain liabilities upon employers who are contributors to a multiemployer plan in the event of the employer’s withdrawal from, or upon termination of, such plan. We do not routinely review information on the net assets and actuarial present value of the multiemployer pension plans’ unfunded vested benefits allocable to us, if any, and we are not presently aware of any material amounts for which we may be contingently liable if we were to withdraw from any of these plans. In addition, if any of these multiemployer plans enters “critical status” under the Pension Protection Act of 2006, we could be required to make significant additional contributions to those plans.
System disruptions to our technology infrastructure could impact our ability to generate revenue and could damage the reputation of our institutions.
The performance and reliability of our technology infrastructure is critical to our reputation and to our ability to attract and retain students. We license the software and related hosting and maintenance services for our online platform and our student information system from third-party software providers. Any system error or failure, or a sudden and significant increase in bandwidth usage, could result in the unavailability of systems to us or our students or result in delays and/or errors in processing student financial aid and related disbursements. Any such system disruptions could impact our ability to generate revenue and affect our ability to access information about our students and could also damage the reputation of our institutions. Any of the cyberattacks, breaches or other disruptions or damage described above could interrupt our operations, result in theft of our and our students’ data or result in legal claims and proceedings, liability and penalties under privacy laws and increased cost for security and remediation, each of which could adversely affect our business and financial results. We may be required to expend significant resources to protect against system errors, failures or disruptions or to repair problems caused by any actual errors, disruptions or failures.
Index
We are subject to privacy and information security laws and regulations due to our collection and use of personal information, and any violations of those laws or regulations, or any breach, theft or loss of that information, could adversely affect our reputation and operations.
Our efforts to attract and enroll students result in the Company collecting, using and storing substantial amounts of personal information regarding applicants, our students, their families and alumni, including social security numbers and financial data. We also maintain personal information about our employees in the ordinary course of our activities. Our services, the services of many of our health plan and benefit plan vendors, and other information can be accessed globally through the internet. We rely extensively on our network of interconnected applications and databases for day to day operations as well as financial reporting and the processing of financial transactions. Our computer networks and those of our vendors that manage confidential information for us or provide services to our students may be vulnerable to computer hackers, organized cyberattacks and physical or electronic breaches or unauthorized access, acts of vandalism, ransomware, software viruses and other similar types of malicious activities. Regular patching of our computer systems and frequent updates to our virus detection and prevention software with the latest virus and malware signatures may not catch newly introduced malware and viruses or “zero-day” viruses, prior to their infecting our systems and potentially disrupting our data integrity, taking sensitive information or affecting financial transactions. While we utilize security and business controls to limit access to and use of personal information, any breach of student or employee privacy or errors in storing, using or transmitting personal information could violate privacy laws and regulations resulting in fines or other penalties. A wide range of high-profile data breaches in recent years has led to renewed interest in federal data and cybersecurity legislation that could increase our costs and/or require changes in our operating procedures or systems. A breach, theft or loss of personal information held by us or our vendors, or a violation of the laws and regulations governing privacy could have a material adverse effect on our reputation or result in lawsuits, additional regulation, remediation and compliance costs or investments in additional security systems to protect our computer networks, the costs of which may be substantial. We cannot assure you that a breach, loss, or theft of personal information will not occur.
Changes in U.S. tax laws or adverse outcomes from examination of our tax returns could have an adverse effect upon our financial results.
We are subject to income tax requirements in various jurisdictions in the United States. Legislation or other changes in the tax laws of the jurisdictions where we do business could increase our liability and adversely affect our after-tax profitability. In addition, we are subject to examination of our income tax returns by the Internal Revenue Service and the taxing authorities of various states. We regularly assess the likelihood of adverse outcomes resulting from tax examinations to determine the adequacy of our provision for income taxes and we have accrued tax and related interest for potential adjustments to tax liabilities for prior years. However, there can be no assurance that the outcomes from these tax examinations will not have a material effect, either positive or negative, on our business, financial conditions and results of operations.
The occurrence of natural or man-made catastrophes, including those caused by climate change and other climate-related causes, could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.
Substantially all of our campuses are located at leased premises in various areas some of which can experience hurricanes, severe storms, floods, coastal storms, tornadoes, power outages and other severe weather events. If these events were to occur and cause damage to our campus facilities, or limit the ability of our students or faculty to participate in or contribute to our academic programs or our ability to comply with federal and state educational requirements, our business may be adversely affected. Disruptions of this kind may also result in increases in student attrition, voluntary or mandatory closure of some or all of our facilities, or our inability to procure essential supplies or travel during the pendency of mandated travel restrictions. We may not be able to effectively shift our operations due to disruptions arising from the occurrence of such events, and our business and results of operations could be affected adversely as a result. Moreover, damage to or total destruction of our campus facilities from various weather events may not be covered in whole or in part by any insurance we may have.
Our success depends, in part, on the effectiveness of our marketing and advertising programs in recruiting new students.
Maintaining our revenues and margins and further increasing them requires us to continue to develop our admissions programs and attract new students in a cost-effective manner. The scope and focus of our marketing and advertising efforts and the strategies used are determined by, among other factors, the specific geographic markets, regulatory compliance requirements and the nature of each institution and its students. If we are unable to advertise and market our institutions and programs successfully, our ability to attract and enroll new students could be materially adversely affected and, consequently, our financial performance could suffer. We use marketing tools such as the internet, radio, television and print media advertising to promote our institutions and programs. Our representatives also make presentations at high schools and career fairs. Additionally, we rely on the general reputation of our institutions and referrals from current students, alumni and employers as a source of new enrollment. As part of our marketing and advertising, we also subscribe to lead-generating databases in certain markets, the cost of which may increase. Among the factors that could prevent us from marketing and advertising our institutions and programs successfully are the failure of our marketing tools and strategies to appeal to prospective students, regulatory constraints on marketing, current student and/or employer dissatisfaction with our program offerings or results and diminished access to high school campuses and military bases. In order to maintain our growth, we will need to attract a larger percentage of students in existing markets and increase our addressable market by adding locations in new markets and rolling out new academic programs. Any failure to accomplish this may have a material adverse effect on our future growth.
Index
Our business could be negatively impacted by cyber and other security threats or disruptions.
Like other companies in our industry, the performance and reliability of our computer networks is essential to our existing operations, our ability to attract and retain students and our reputation. And, like all companies that utilize technology, we face significant cybersecurity and other security threats that include, among other things, attempts to gain unauthorized access to sensitive student and employee information; attempts to compromise the integrity, confidentiality and/or availability of our systems, hardware and networks, and the information on them; insider threats; malware; ransomware; threats to the safety of our directors, officers and employees; and threats to our facilities, infrastructure and services. We are also subject to increasing government, student information and cybersecurity and other security requirements, including disclosure obligations.
We continue to invest in the cybersecurity and resiliency of our networks and products and enhance our internal controls and processes, which are designed to help protect our systems and infrastructure, and the information they contain. These include timely detection of incidents through monitoring, training, incident response capabilities, and mitigating cybersecurity and other risks to our data, systems and services. However, given the complex, continuing and evolving nature of cybersecurity threats and other security threats, including threats from targeting by more advanced and persistent adversaries, these efforts may not be fully effective, particularly against previously unknown vulnerabilities that could go undetected for extended periods of time. Successful attacks could lead to losses or misuse of sensitive information or capabilities; theft or corruption of data; harm to personnel, infrastructure or products; financial costs and liabilities; protracted disruptions in our operations and performance; as well as damage to our reputation as a provider of educational services.
Our students and corporate business partners to whom we entrust confidential data, and on whom we rely to provide services, face similar threats and growing requirements, including ones for which others may seek to hold us responsible. We depend on our students, suppliers, and other business partners to implement and verify adequate controls and safeguards to protect against and report cybersecurity incidents. If they fail to deter, detect or report cybersecurity incidents in a timely manner, we may suffer financial and other harm, including to our information, operations, performance, employees and reputation.
Additionally, while we maintain insurance against certain losses relating to cybersecurity threats and incidents that we believe to be at adequate levels of coverage, such coverage may not be sufficient to address an incident and we may not always be able to obtain adequate insurance to cover our losses.
We also face threats to our physical security, including to our facilities and the safety and the well-being of our people. These threats could involve terrorism, insider threats, workplace violence, civil unrest, natural disasters, damaging weather, or fires, which could adversely affect our company. Such acts could detrimentally impact our ability to perform our operations. We could also incur unanticipated costs to remediate impacts and lost business. The occurrence and impact of these various risks are difficult to predict, but one or more of them could have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations and/or cash flows.
RISKS RELATED TO OUR CAPITAL STRUCTURE
Anti-takeover provisions in our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, our Bylaws and New Jersey law could discourage a change of control that our shareholders may favor, which could negatively affect our stock price.
Provisions in our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation and our Bylaws and applicable provisions of the New Jersey Business Corporation Act may make it more difficult and expensive for a third party to acquire control of the Company even if a change of control would be beneficial to the interests of our shareholders. These provisions could discourage potential takeover attempts and could adversely affect the market price of our Common Stock. For example, applicable provisions of the New Jersey Business Corporation Act may discourage, delay or prevent a change in control by prohibiting us from engaging in a business combination with an interested shareholder for a period of five years after the person becomes an interested shareholder. Furthermore, our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws:
•
authorize the issuance of blank check Preferred Stock that could be issued by our Board of Directors to thwart a takeover attempt;
•
prohibit cumulative voting in the election of directors, which would otherwise allow holders of less than a majority of stock to elect some directors;
•
require super-majority voting to effect amendments to certain provisions of our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation;
•
limit who may call special meetings of both the Board of Directors and shareholders;
•
prohibit shareholder action by non-unanimous written consent and otherwise require all shareholder actions to be taken at a meeting of the shareholders;
Index
•
establish advance notice requirements for nominating candidates for election to the Board of Directors or for proposing matters that can be acted upon by shareholders at shareholders’ meetings; and
•
require that vacancies on the Board of Directors, including newly created directorships, be filled only by a majority vote of directors then in office.
We can issue shares of Preferred Stock without general shareholder approval, which could adversely affect the rights of common shareholders.
Our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation permits us to establish the rights, privileges, preferences and restrictions, including voting rights, of future series of our Preferred Stock and to issue such stock without approval from our shareholders. The rights of holders of our Common Stock may suffer as a result of the rights granted to holders of Preferred Stock that may be issued in the future. In addition, we could issue Preferred Stock to prevent a change in control of our Company, depriving common shareholders of an opportunity to sell their stock at a price in excess of the prevailing market price.
The trading price of our Common Stock may continue to fluctuate substantially in the future.
Our stock price may fluctuate significantly as a result of a number of factors, some of which are not in our control. These factors include:
•
general economic conditions;
•
general conditions in the for-profit, post-secondary education industry;
•
negative media coverage of the for-profit, post-secondary education industry;
•
failure of certain of our schools or programs to maintain compliance under the gainful employment regulation, 90/10 Rule or with financial responsibility standards;
•
the impact of DOE rulemaking and other changes in the highly regulated environment in which we operate;
•
the initiation, pendency or outcome of litigation, accreditation reviews and regulatory reviews, inquiries and investigations;
•
loss of key personnel;
•
quarterly variations in our operating results;
•
our ability to meet or exceed, or changes in, expectations of investors and analysts, or the extent of analyst coverage of us; and decisions by any significant investors to reduce their investment in our Common Stock.
In addition, the trading volume of our Common Stock is relatively low. This may cause our stock price to react more to these factors and various other factors and may impact an investor’s ability to sell our Common Stock at the desired time at a price considered satisfactory. Any of these factors may adversely affect the trading price of our Common Stock, regardless of our actual operating performance, and could prevent an investor from selling shares of our Common Stock at or above the price at which the investor purchased them.

---

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
ITEM 1B.
UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
None.

---

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
ITEM 2.
PROPERTIES
As of December 31, 2023, we leased all of our facilities, except the Levittown, Pennsylvania campus, for which we entered into a sale lease-back transaction on January 30, 2024. We continue to reevaluate our facilities to maximize our facility utilization and efficiency and to allow us to introduce new programs and attract more students. As of December 31, 2023, all of our existing leases expire between 2024 and 2045.
The following table provides information relating to our facilities as of December 31, 2023, including our corporate office:
Current Locations
Brand
Approximate Square Footage
Las Vegas, Nevada
Euphoria Institute
23,000
Columbia, Maryland
Lincoln College of Technology
111,000
Denver, Colorado
Lincoln College of Technology
213,000
Grand Prairie, Texas
Lincoln College of Technology
157,000
Indianapolis, Indiana
Lincoln College of Technology
126,000
Marietta, Georgia
Lincoln College of Technology
30,000
Melrose Park, Illinois
Lincoln College of Technology
88,000
Allentown, Pennsylvania
Lincoln Technical Institute
25,000
East Windsor, Connecticut
Lincoln Technical Institute
289,000
Iselin, New Jersey
Lincoln Technical Institute
32,000
Lincoln, Rhode Island
Lincoln Technical Institute
66,000
Mahwah, New Jersey
Lincoln Technical Institute
79,000
Moorestown, New Jersey
Lincoln Technical Institute
48,000
New Britain, Connecticut
Lincoln Technical Institute
36,000
Paramus, New Jersey
Lincoln Technical Institute
30,000
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Lincoln Technical Institute
30,000
Queens, New York
Lincoln Technical Institute
48,000
Shelton, Connecticut
Lincoln Technical Institute and Lincoln Culinary Institute
57,000
South Plainfield, New Jersey
Lincoln Technical Institute
60,000
Union, New Jersey
Lincoln Technical Institute
56,000
Nashville, Tennessee
Lincoln College of Technology
292,000
Parsippany, New Jersey
Corporate Office
17,000
Future Locations
Brand
Approximate Square Footage
Houston, Texas1
Lincoln College of Technology
100,000
Levittown, Pennsylania3
Lincoln Technical Institute
90,000
East Point, Georgia4
Lincoln Technical Institute
55,000
Nashville, Tennessee2
Lincoln College of Technology
120,000
We believe that our facilities are suitable for their intended purposes.
On October 31, 2023, the Company entered into a lease for approximately 100,000 square feet of space to serve as the Company’s new campus in Houston, Texas. The lease term commenced on January 2, 2024, with an initial lease term of 21-years and 6 months with three five-year renewal options.
On October 18, 2023, the Company entered into a lease for approximately 120,000 square feet of space. to serve as the Company’s new Nashville, Tennessee campus. The lease term commenced on November 1, 2023, with an initial lease term of 15-years with two five-year renewal options.
On September 28, 2023, the Company purchased a 90,000 square foot property located at 311 Veterans Highway, Levittown, Pennsylvania for approximately $10.2 million and, subsequently on January 30, 2024, entered into a sale-leaseback transaction for this property. As of December 31, 2023, this property was classified as held-for-sale on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
On June 30, 2022, the Company executed a lease for approximately 55,000 square feet of space to serve as the Company’s new campus, in East Point, Georgia. The lease term commenced in August 2022 with an initial lease term of 12 years term with two five-year renewal options. The Company had no involvement in the construction or design of the facilities on the property and was not deemed to be in control of the asset prior to the lease commencement date. For the year ended December 31, 2023, the Company incurred approximately $0.8 million in rent expenses.
Index

---

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
ITEM 3.
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
On June 22, 2022, the plaintiff student loan borrowers in a class action against the DOE in federal court in California (Sweet v. Cardona, No. 3:19-cv-3674 (N.D. Cal.)) and the DOE announced a proposed settlement agreement to resolve claims that the DOE has failed to timely decide Borrower Defense to Repayment applications submitted to the DOE. The proposed settlement included three categories of relief for student loan borrowers. First, it set forth a list of approximately 150 institutions, including Lincoln Technical Institute and Lincoln College of Technology, and, under the settlement, the DOE would agree to discharge loans and refund prior loan payments to class members with loan debt associated with an institution on the list (which includes Lincoln institutions). The class action plaintiffs and the DOE stated that the DOE had determined that attendance at one of the listed institutions justifies presumptive relief allegedly based on strong indicia regarding substantial misconduct by the institutions, whether credibly alleged or in some instances proven, and the purportedly high rate of class members with applications related to the listed schools. Second, the proposed settlement included new procedures for DOE to resolve pending borrower defense claims associated with other schools not on the list. Third, for any student loan borrower who submitted a borrower defense application after June 22, 2022 and before the final approval of the settlement, the proposed settlement would require the DOE to review the applications under the DOE’s 2016 regulatory standards and issue decisions within 36 months, or else the applications would be discharged in full.
At the time the plaintiffs and DOE announced the proposed settlement, Lincoln was not a party to the lawsuit and none of the named plaintiffs had attended a Lincoln institution. In August 2022, Lincoln and three other schools were granted permission to intervene in the lawsuit to protect their interests in the finalization and implementation of any settlement agreement the court might approve. In October 2022, the four intervening schools, including Lincoln, filed objections to the final approval of the settlement, asserting reputational harms from the schools’ inclusion on the settlement’s list of schools and denial of schools’ due process rights under the DOE’s borrower defense regulations.
On November 16, 2022, the federal district court overruled the four schools’ objections and approved the settlement as proposed. As a result of this final approval, the DOE has estimated that approximately 196,000 student loan borrowers who attended one of the listed schools (including Lincoln institutions) will receive automatic student loan discharges; that another approximately 100,000 student loan borrowers who attended other schools not on the list would receive decisions under new procedures; and that approximately 250,000 student loan borrowers who submitted borrower defense applications between June 22, 2022 and November 16, 2022 would receive decisions under the DOE’s 2016 regulatory standards within 36 months or else receive automatic student loan discharges.
On January 13, 2023, Lincoln appealed the settlement’s final approval to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Two of the three other intervenor schools also appealed on the same date. The three appealing schools also sought to stay the implementation of the settlement while their appeals were being decided, but the requested stay was denied by the district court, the Ninth Circuit, and the U.S. Supreme Court. As a result, the DOE is implementing the settlement relief while the three schools appeal the settlement’s final approval.
Lincoln and the two other appealing schools filed their opening appellate brief in the Ninth Circuit on May 3, 2023. The plaintiffs and the DOE filed their opposition appellate briefs on August 2, 2023. Lincoln and the two other appealing schools filed their reply appellate brief on September 22, 2023. The Ninth Circuit heard oral argument on December 5, 2023, and is currently considering the appeal.
It is not possible at this time to predict whether the settlement will be upheld on appeal, what actions the DOE might take if the settlement is upheld on appeal, or whether the DOE or other agencies might take actions against Lincoln institutions before the appeal is decided. Such actions could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations. Even if the Ninth Circuit rules in our favor and if the approval of the settlement is overturned, the DOE already may have discharged by that time the loans associated with some or all of the pending applications. We have seen evidence that the DOE already may have discharged some of the loans associated with some of the pending applications, but the DOE has not furnished definitive data to us necessary to determine the extent to which applications have been granted. The DOE may or may not attempt to seek recoupment from applicable schools relating to approval of borrower defense applications. The settlement also requires the DOE to review and decide borrower defense applications submitted after June 22, 2022 and before November 16, 2022 within 36 months of the final settlement date. If the DOE grants some or all of these applications, the DOE also could attempt to recoup from us the loan amounts relating to these applications. If the DOE approves borrower defense applications concerning us and attempts to recoup from us the loan amounts in the approved applications, we would consider our options for challenging the legal and factual bases for such actions.
We cannot predict what other actions the DOE might take if the settlement is fully implemented, including the amount of borrower defense applications that the DOE might grant or the amount of any recoupment that the DOE might seek from us, if any. We also cannot predict the outcome of any challenges we might make to such actions.
In addition to the foregoing, in the ordinary conduct of our business, we are subject to additional periodic lawsuits, investigations, regulatory proceedings and other claims, including, but not limited to, claims involving students or graduates, routine employment matters and business disputes. We cannot predict the ultimate resolution of these lawsuits, investigations, regulatory proceedings and other claims asserted against us, but we do not believe that any of these matters will have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
Index

---

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURE
ITEM 4.
MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
Not applicable.
PART II.

---

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY
ITEM 5.
MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
Market for our Common Stock
Our Common Stock, no par value per share, is quoted on the Nasdaq Global Select Market under the symbol “LINC”.
On February 29, 2024, the last reported sale price of our Common Stock on the Nasdaq Global Select Market was $10.06 per share. As of February 29, 2024, based on the information provided by Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company, there were 42 shareholders of record of our Common Stock.
Dividend Policy
The Company has not declared or paid any cash dividends on its Common Stock since the Company’s Board of Directors discontinued our quarterly cash dividend program in February 2015. The Company has no current intentions to resume the payment of cash dividends on its Common Stock in the foreseeable future.
During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022, the Company paid a total of $1.1 million in cash dividends to holders of its Series A Convertible Preferred Stock (the “Series A Preferred Stock”) pursuant to the Securities Purchase Agreement entered into on November 14, 2019 and the Company’s Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation.
On November 30, 2022, the Company exercised in full its right of mandatory conversion of the Company’s Series A Preferred Stock. In connection with the conversion, each share of Series A Preferred Stock has been cancelled and converted into 423.729 shares of the Company’s Common Stock, no par value per share. Shares of the Series A Preferred Stock are no longer outstanding and all rights of the holders to receive future dividends have terminated. As a result of the conversion, the aggregate 12,700 shares of Series A Preferred Stock were converted into 5,381,356 shares of Common Stock.
Share Repurchases
On May 24, 2022, the Company announced that the Board of Directors had approved a share repurchase program for 12 months authorizing purchases of up to $30.0 million. Subsequently, on February 27, 2023, the Board of Directors extended the share repurchase program for an additional 12 months and authorized the repurchase of an additional $10.0 million of the Company’s Common Stock, for an aggregate of up to $30.6 million in additional repurchases.
The following table presents the number and average price of shares purchased during the three months ended December 31, 2023. The remaining authorized amount for share repurchases under the program at December 31, 2023 was approximately $29.7 million.
Period
Total Number of Shares Purchased
Average Price Paid per Share
Total Number of
Shares Purchased
as Part of Publically
Announced Plan
Maximum Dollar
Value of Shares
Remaining to be
Purchased Under
the Plan
October 1, 2023 to October 31, 2023
-
$
-
-
$
29,663,667
November 1, 2023 to November 30, 2023
-
-
-
-
December 1, 2023 to December 31, 2023
-
-
-
-
Total
-
-
-
For more information on the share repurchase program, See Part II. Item 8. “Financial Statements and Supplemental Data - Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - Note 12 Stockholders Equity.”
Index
Equity Compensation Plan Information
We have various equity compensation plans under which equity securities are authorized for issuance. Information regarding these securities as of December 31, 2023, is as follows:
Plan Category
Number of
Securities to be
issued upon
exercise of
outstanding
options,
warrants and
rights
Weighted-
average exercise
price of
outstanding
options,
warrants and
rights
Number of
securities
remaining
available for
future issuance
under equity
compensation
plans (excluding
securities
reflected in
column (a))
(a)
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders
-
$
-
127,507
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders
-
-
-
Total
-
$
-
127,507

---

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
ITEM 6.
[RESERVED]
Index

---

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
ITEM 7.
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
You should read the following discussion together with the “Forward-Looking Statements” and the Consolidated Financial Statements and the related notes thereto included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. This discussion contains forward-looking statements that are based on management’s current expectations, estimates and projections about our business and operations. Our actual results may differ materially from those currently anticipated and expressed in such forward-looking statements as a result of a number of factors, including those we discuss under “Risk Factors” and “Forward-Looking Statements” and elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
GENERAL
Lincoln Educational Services Corporation and its subsidiaries (collectively, the “Company”, “we”, “our” and “us”, as applicable) provide diversified career-oriented post-secondary education to recent high school graduates and working adults. The Company, which currently operates 21 campuses, in 13 states has added two additional campuses, one located in East Point, Georgia and the other in Houston, Texas. As of December 31, 2023, these campuses were not operational however, the East Point, Georgia campus is expected to hold its first class in March of 2024 and the Houston, Texas campus is expected to become operational in the first quarter of 2026. Lincoln Educational Services Corporation offers
programs in skilled trades (which include HVAC, welding and computerized numerical control and electrical and electronic systems technology, among other programs), automotive technology, healthcare services (which include nursing, dental assistant and medical administrative assistant, among other programs) and hospitality services and information technology (which include culinary, therapeutic massage, cosmetology and aesthetics and information technology programs). The schools operate under Lincoln Technical Institute, Lincoln College of Technology, Lincoln Culinary Institute, and Euphoria Institute of Beauty Arts and Sciences and associated brand names. Most of the campuses serve major metropolitan markets and each typically offers courses in multiple areas of study. Five of the campuses are destination schools, which attract students from across the United States and, in some cases, from abroad. The Company’s other campuses primarily attract students from their local communities and surrounding areas. All of the campuses are nationally accredited and are eligible to participate in federal financial aid programs administered by the U.S. Department of Education (the “DOE”) and applicable state education agencies and accrediting commissions which allow students to apply for and access federal student loans as well as other forms of financial aid. The Company was incorporated in New Jersey in 2003 as the successor-in-interest to various acquired schools including Lincoln Technical Institute, Inc. which opened its first campus in Newark, New Jersey in 1946.
As of January 1, 2023, the Company’s business has been organized into two reportable business segments: (a) Campus Operations; and (b) Transitional. Based on trends in student demand and program expansion, there have been more cross-offerings of programs among the various campuses. Given this change, the Company has revised the way it manages the business, evaluates performance and allocates resources, resulting in an updated segment structure. The Campus Operations segment includes campuses that are in operation and contribute to the Company’s core operations and performance. The Transitional segment refers to campuses that are marked for closure and are currently being taught-out. In November, 2022, the Board of Directors approved a plan to close the Somerville, Massachusetts campus which has now been fully taught-out. As of December 31, 2023, the only campus classified in the Transitional segment is the Somerville, Massachusetts campus.
As of December 31, 2023, we had 13,270 students enrolled at 21 campuses. Our average enrollment for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023 was 12,941 students and our revenues were $378.1 million, which represented an increase of 8.6% over the prior fiscal year. For more information relating to our revenues, profits and financial condition, please refer to our Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
We believe that we provide our students with the highest quality career-oriented training available for our areas of study in our markets thereby serving students, local employers and their communities. The skills gap continues to expand as talent retires faster than new employees are hired and as the need for education and training increases in all careers with the accelerating pace of technological change. We offer programs in areas of study that we believe are typically underserved by traditional providers of post-secondary education and for which we believe there exists significant demand among students and employers. Furthermore, we believe our convenient class scheduling, career-focused curricula and emphasis on job placement offer our students valuable advantages that have been previously unaddressed by the traditional academic sector. By combining virtual training with traditional classroom-based training led by experienced instructors, we believe we offer our students a unique opportunity to develop practical job skills in many of the key areas of expected job demand. We believe these job skills enable our students to compete effectively for employment opportunities and to pursue salary and career advancement.
Index
In the last two years, we have further implemented our plan of improving the student experience by, among other things, further improving our campuses. In October 2023, the Company entered into a lease for approximately 100,000 square feet of space to serve as the Company’s new campus in Houston, Texas. The lease term commenced on January 2, 2024, with an initial lease term of 21 years and 6 months and three five-year renewal options. Also, in October 2023, the Company entered into a lease for approximately 120,000 square feet of space to serve as the Company’s new Nashville, Tennessee campus. The lease term commenced on November 1, 2023, with an initial lease term of 15 years and two five-year renewal options. In September 2023, the Company closed on the purchase of a 90,000 square foot property located at 311 Veterans Highway, Levittown, Pennsylvania for approximately $10.2 million and, subsequently on January 30, 2024 closed on a sale-leaseback transaction of this property. As of December 31, 2023, this property is classified as held-for-sale on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. In June, 2022, the Company executed a lease for approximately 55,000 square feet of space to serve as the Company’s new campus in East Point, Georgia. The lease term commenced in August 2022, with an initial lease term of 12 years and two five-year renewal options. For the year ended December 31, 2023, the Company incurred approximately $0.8 million in rent expenses. See Part II. Item 8. “Financial Statements and Supplemental Data - Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - Note 6 Leases and Note 8 Real Estate Transactions.”
Our revenues consist primarily of student tuition and fees derived from the programs we offer. Our revenues are reduced by scholarships granted by us to some of our students. We recognize revenues from tuition and one-time fees, such as application fees, ratably over the length of a program, including internships or externships that take place prior to graduation. We also earn revenues from our bookstores, dormitories, cafeterias and contract training services. These non-tuition revenues are recognized upon delivery of goods or as services are performed and represent less than 10% of our revenues.
Our revenues are directly dependent on the average number of students enrolled in our schools and the courses in which they are enrolled. Our average enrollment is impacted by the number of new students starting, re-entering, graduating and withdrawing from our schools. Our diploma/certificate programs range in duration from 19 to 104 weeks, our associate’s degree programs range in duration from 69 to 92 weeks, and students attend classes for different amounts of time per week depending on the school and program in which they are enrolled. Because we start new students every month, our total student population changes monthly. The number of students enrolling or re-entering our programs each month is driven by the demand for our programs, the effectiveness of our marketing and advertising, the availability of financial aid and other sources of funding, the number of recent high school graduates, the job market and seasonality. Our retention and graduation rates are influenced by the quality and commitment of our teachers and student services personnel, the effectiveness of our programs, the placement rate and success of our graduates and the availability of financial aid and other sources of funding. Although similar courses have comparable tuition rates, the tuition rates vary among our numerous programs.
The majority of students enrolled at our schools rely on funds received under various government-sponsored student financial aid programs to pay a substantial portion of their tuition and other education-related expenses. The largest of these programs are Title IV Programs which represented approximately 81% and 74% of our revenue on a cash basis while the remainder is primarily derived from state grants and cash payments made by students during fiscal years 2023 and 2022, respectively. The HEA requires institutions to use the cash basis of accounting when determining its compliance with the 90/10 Rule. See Part I, Item 1. “Business - Regulatory Environment.”
We extend credit for tuition and fees to many of our students that attend our campuses. Our credit risk is mitigated by the students’ participation in federally funded financial aid programs unless students withdraw prior to the receipt by us of Title IV Program funds for those students. Under Title IV Programs, the government funds a certain portion of a student’s tuition, with the remainder, referred to as “the gap,” financed by the students themselves under third party private party loans and once these financial options have been fully exhausted, the Company may offer extended payment plans. The gap amount has continued to increase over the last several years as we have raised tuition on average for the last several years by 2-3% per year.
The additional extension of credit that we are providing to students may expose us to greater credit risk and can impact our liquidity. However, we believe that these risks are somewhat mitigated by the following:
•
our internal extension of credit is provided to students only after all other funding resources have been exhausted; thus, by the time this funding is available, students have completed approximately two-thirds of their curriculum and are more likely to graduate and, as a consequence, more likely to pay outstanding tuition amounts;
•
funding for students who interrupt their education is typically covered by Title IV Program funds as long as they have been properly packaged for financial aid.
The operating expenses associated with an existing school do not increase or decrease proportionally as the number of students enrolled at the school increases or decreases. We categorize our operating expenses as:
•
Educational services and facilities. Major components of educational services and facilities expenses include faculty compensation and benefits, expenses of books and tools, facility rent, maintenance, utilities, depreciation and amortization of property and equipment used in the provision of education services and other costs directly associated with teaching our programs excluding student services which is included in selling, general and administrative expenses.
•
Selling, general and administrative. Selling, general and administrative expenses include compensation and benefits of employees who are not directly associated with the provision of educational services (such as executive management and school management, finance and central accounting, legal, human resources and business development), marketing and student enrollment expenses (including compensation and benefits of personnel employed in sales and marketing and student admissions), costs to develop curriculum, costs of professional services, bad debt expense, rent for our corporate headquarters, depreciation and amortization of property and equipment that is not used in the provision of educational services and other costs that are incidental to our operations. Selling, general and administrative expenses also includes the cost of all student services including financial aid and career services. All marketing and student enrollment expenses are recognized in the period incurred.
Index
Real Estate Transactions
Purchase and Sale-leaseback Transaction - Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Area Campus
On September 28, 2023, the Company purchased a 90,000 square foot property located at 311 Veterans Highway, Levittown, Pennsylvania for approximately $10.2 million and on January 30, 2024, the Company has subsequently entered into a sale-leaseback transaction for this property. The Company plans to invest approximately $15.0 million, net of the tenant improvement allowance, in the buildout of new classrooms and training areas. As of December 31, 2023, the new campus is classified as held-for-sale on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. See Part II. Item 8. “Financial Statements and Supplemental Data - Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - Note 19 Subsequent Events”.
Property Sale Agreement - Nashville, Tennessee Campus
On September 24, 2021, Nashville Acquisition, L.L.C., a subsidiary of the Company, entered into a Contract for the Purchase of Real Estate (the “Nashville Contract”) to sell the nearly 16-acre property located at 524 Gallatin Avenue, Nashville, Tennessee 37206, at which the Company operates its Nashville campus, to SLC Development, LLC, a subsidiary of Southern Land Company (“SLC”).
On June 8, 2023, the Company closed on the sale of its Nashville, Tennessee property to East Nashville Owner, LLC, an affiliate of SLC, for approximately $33.8 million pursuant to the Nashville Contract. The net proceeds from the Nashville sale, net of closing costs, are available for working capital, acquisitions, other strategic initiatives, and general corporate purposes. In connection with the sale, the parties entered into a lease agreement allowing Lincoln to continue to occupy the campus and operate it on a rent-free basis for a period of 15 months plus options to extend the lease for up to three consecutive 30-day terms at $150,000 per extension term. The carrying value of the campus is approximately $4.5 million and the estimated fair value of the rent for the 15-month rent-free period was approximately $2.3 million at the consummation of the lease. As of December 31, 2023, approximately $1.3 million remains and is included in prepaid expenses and other current assets on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
Our discussions of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our Consolidated Financial Statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, or GAAP. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the Consolidated Financial Statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the period. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates and assumptions, including those related to revenue recognition, bad debts, goodwill and impairment of long-lived assets and income taxes. Actual results could differ from those estimates. The critical accounting policies discussed herein are not intended to be a comprehensive list of all of our accounting policies. In many cases, the accounting treatment of a particular transaction is specifically dictated by GAAP and does not result in significant management judgment in the application of such principles. We believe that the following accounting policies are most critical to us in that they represent the primary areas where financial information is subject to the application of management's estimates, assumptions and judgment in the preparation of our Consolidated Financial Statements.
Revenue recognition. Substantially all of our revenues are considered to be revenues from contracts with students. The related accounts receivable balances are recorded in our balance sheets as student accounts receivable. We do not have significant revenue recognized from performance obligations that were satisfied in prior periods, and we do not have any transaction price allocated to unsatisfied performance obligations other than in our unearned tuition. We record revenue for students who withdraw from our schools only to the extent that it is probable that a significant reversal in the amount of cumulative revenue recognized will not occur. Unearned tuition represents contract liabilities primarily related to our tuition revenue. We have elected not to provide disclosure about transaction prices allocated to unsatisfied performance obligations if original contract durations are less than one-year, or if we have the right to consideration from a student in an amount that corresponds directly with the value provided to the student for performance obligations completed to date in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 606, Revenue from Contract with Customers. We have assessed the costs incurred to obtain a contract with a student and determined them to be immaterial.
Allowance for Credit Losses. On January 1, 2023, the Company adopted Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2016-13, Financial
Instruments-Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments. As a result of the adoption, the Company has revised the way in which it calculates reserves on outstanding student accounts receivable balances. Details considered by management in the estimate include the following:
Index
We extend credit to a portion of the students who are enrolled at our academic institutions for tuition and certain other educational costs. Based upon past experience and judgment, we establish an allowance for credit losses with respect to student receivables which we estimate will ultimately not be collectible. Our standard student receivable allowance is based on an estimate of lifetime expected credit losses for student receivables that considers vintages of receivables to determine a loss rate. Our estimation methodology considers a number of quantitative and qualitative factors that, based on our collection experience, we believe have an impact on our repayment risk and ability to collect student receivables. Changes in the trends in any of these factors may impact our estimate of the allowance for credit losses. These factors include, but are not limited to: internal repayment history, changes in the current economic, legislative or regulatory environments, internal cash collection forecasts and the ability to complete the federal financial aid process with the student. These factors are monitored and assessed on a regular basis. Overall, our allowance estimation process for student receivables is validated by trending analysis and comparing estimated and actual performance.
Management makes a series of assumptions to determine what is believed to be the appropriate level of allowance for credit losses. Management determines a reasonable and supportable forecast based on the expectation of future conditions over a supportable forecast period as described above, as well as qualitative adjustments based on current and future conditions that may not be fully captured in the historical modeling factors described above. All of these estimates are susceptible to significant change.
We monitor our collections and write-off experience to assess whether or not adjustments to our allowance percentage estimates are necessary. Changes in trends in any of the factors that we believe impact the collection of our student receivables, as noted above, or modifications to our collection practices, and other related policies may impact our estimate of our allowance for credit losses and our results from operations.
Because a substantial portion of our revenue is derived from Title IV Programs, any legislative or regulatory action that significantly reduces the funding available under Title IV Programs, or the ability of our students or institutions to participate in Title IV Programs, would likely have a material impact on the realizability of our receivables.
Our bad debt expense as a percentage of revenues for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022 was 11.0% and 10.0%, respectively. A 1% increase in our bad debt expense as a percentage of revenues for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022 would have resulted in an increase in bad debt expense of $3.8 million and $3.5 million, respectively.
We do not believe that there is any direct correlation between tuition increases, the credit we extend to students and our financing commitments. The extended financing plans we offer to our students are made on a student-by-student basis and are predominantly a function of the specific student’s financial condition. We only extend credit to the extent there is a financing gap between the tuition and fees charged for the program and the amount of grants, loans and parental loans each student receives. Each student’s funding requirements are unique. Factors that determine the amount of aid available to a student include whether they are dependent or independent students, Pell Grants awarded, federal Direct Loans awarded, PLUS loans awarded to parents and the student’s personal resources and family contributions. As a result, it is extremely difficult to predict the number of students that will need us to extend credit to them.
Because a substantial portion of our revenues is derived from Title IV Programs, any legislative or regulatory action that significantly reduces the funding available under Title IV Programs or the ability of our students or schools to participate in Title IV Programs could have a material effect on the realizability of our receivables.
Goodwill. Goodwill represents the excess of purchase price over the fair value of tangible net assets and identifiable intangible assets of the businesses acquired. Lincoln tests goodwill for impairment annually, in the fourth quarter of each year, unless there are events or changes in circumstances that indicate an impairment may have occurred. Impairment may result from deterioration in performance, adverse market conditions, adverse changes in laws or regulations, the restriction of activities associated with the acquired business, and/or a variety of other circumstances. If we determine that impairment has occurred, we record a write-down of the carrying value and charge the impairment as an operating expense in the period the determination is made.
As of December 31, 2023, goodwill was approximately $10.7 million, or 3.1%, of our total assets.
When we perform our annual goodwill impairment assessment we have the option to perform a qualitative assessment based on a number of factors impacting our reporting units (Step 0). When a qualitative assessment is performed, a number of factors are evaluated to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying value. Our qualitative assessment is subjective. It includes a review of macroeconomic and industry factors, review of financial and non-financial performance measures, including projected student starts and assessment of adverse events that may negatively impact a reporting units carrying value. Adverse events would include, but are not limited to, difficulty in accessing capital, a greater competitive environment, decline in market-dependent multiples or metrics, regulatory or political developments, change in key personnel, strategy, or customers, or litigation. If we conclude based on our qualitative review that it is more likely than not that the fair value of the reporting unit is less than the carrying value, we proceed with a quantitative impairment test.
Index
When we perform our quantitative impairment test we believe the most critical assumptions and estimates in determining the estimated fair value of our reporting units include, but are not limited to, future tuition revenues, operating costs, working capital changes, capital expenditures and a discount rate. The assumptions used in determining our expected future cash flows consider various factors such as historical operating trends particularly in student enrollment and pricing and long-term operating strategies and initiatives.
If we determine that quantitative tests are necessary, we determine the fair value of each reporting unit using an equal weighting of the discounted cash flow model and the market approach, or if required, we will evaluate other asset value-based approaches. Our judgment is necessary in forecasting future cash flows and operating results, critical assumptions include growth rates, changes in operating costs, capital expenditures, changes in weighted average costs of capital, and the fair value of an asset based on the price that would be received in a current transaction to sell the asset. Additionally, we obtain independent market metrics for the industry and our peers to assist in the development of these key assumptions. This process is consistent with our internal forecasts and operating plans.
On June 8, 2023, the Company consummated the sale of its Nashville, Tennessee property (see Part II. Item 8. “Financial Statements and Supplemental Data” - Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - Note 8 Real Estate Transactions”). The result of the sale created a change in the trajectory of the fair value of the Nashville, Tennessee operations and as such, the Company recorded a pre-tax non-cash impairment charge of $3.8 million relating to goodwill. For the year ended December 31, 2022, there were no impairments related to goodwill.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets. The Company reviews the carrying value of its long-lived assets and identifiable intangibles for possible impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amounts may not be recoverable. For other long-lived assets, including right-of-use (“ROU”) lease assets, the Company evaluates assets for recoverability when there is an indication of potential impairment. Factors the Company considers important, which could trigger an impairment review, include significant changes in the manner of the use of the asset, significant changes in historical trends in operating performance, significant changes in projected operating performance, and significant negative economic trends. If the undiscounted cash flows from a group of assets being evaluated is less than the carrying value of that group of assets, the fair value of the asset group is determined and the carrying value of the asset group is written down to fair value.
When we perform the quantitative impairment test for long-lived assets, we examine estimated future cash flows using Level 3 inputs. These cash flows are evaluated by using weighted probability techniques as well as comparisons of past performance against projections. Assets may also be evaluated by identifying independent market values. If the Company determines that an asset’s carrying value is impaired, it will record a write-down of the carrying value of the asset and charge the impairment as an operating expense in the period in which the determination is made.
As a result of the Nashville sale discussed above, the Company also recorded a pre-tax non-cash impairment charge of $0.4 million relating to long-lived assets.
On December 31, 2022, as a result of impairment testing it was determined that there was a long-lived asset impairment of $1.0 million. The impairment was the result of an assessment of the current market value, as compared to the carrying value of the assets.
Income taxes. The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with ASC Topic 740, Income Taxes (“ASC 740”). This statement requires an asset and a liability approach for measuring deferred taxes based on temporary differences between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities existing at each balance sheet date using enacted tax rates for years in which taxes are expected to be paid or recovered.
In accordance with ASC 740, the Company assesses our deferred tax asset to determine whether all or any portion of the asset is more likely than not unrealizable. A valuation allowance is required to be established or maintained when, based on currently available information, it is more likely than not that all or a portion of a deferred tax asset will not be realized. In accordance with ASC 740, our assessment considers whether there has been sufficient income in recent years and whether sufficient income is expected in future years in order to utilize the deferred tax asset. In evaluating the realizability of deferred income tax assets, the Company considers, among other things, historical levels of income, expected future income, the expected timing of the reversals of existing temporary reporting differences, and the expected impact of tax planning strategies that may be implemented to prevent the potential loss of future income tax benefits. Significant judgment is required in determining the future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in our Consolidated Financial Statements and/or tax returns. Differences between anticipated and actual outcomes of these future tax consequences could have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations. Changes in, among other things, income tax legislation, statutory income tax rates or future income levels could materially impact the Company’s valuation of income tax assets and liabilities and could cause our income tax provision to vary significantly among financial reporting periods.
We recognize accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense. During the fiscal years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, we did not record any interest and penalties expense associated with uncertain tax positions, as we do not have any uncertain tax positions.
Index
Results of Operations for the Two Years Ended December 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022
The following table sets forth selected consolidated statements of operations data as a percentage of revenues for each of the periods indicated:
Year Ended Dec 31,
Revenue
100.0
%
100.0
%
Costs and expenses:
Educational services and facilities
42.9
%
42.7
%
Selling, general and administrative
55.3
%
52.4
%
Gain on sale of assets
-8.2
%
-0.1
%
Impairment of goodwill and long-lived assets
1.1
%
0.3
%
Total costs and expenses
91.2
%
95.3
%
Operating income
8.8
%
4.7
%
Interest expense, net
0.6
%
0.0
%
Income from operations before income taxes
9.4
%
4.7
%
Provision for income taxes
2.6
%
1.1
%
Net income
6.8
%
3.6
%
Year Ended December 31, 2023 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2022
Consolidated Results of Operations
Revenue. Revenue increased $29.8 million, or 8.6% to $378.1 million for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023 from $348.3 million in the prior year comparable period. Excluding the Transitional segment revenue of $1.5 million and $6.8 million for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively, our revenue would have increased $35.2 million, or 10.3%. The remaining increase in revenue was driven by several factors including student start growth of 11.4% and an increase in average revenue per student of 8.0%, driven in part by the continuing rollout of the Company’s hybrid teaching model in combination with tuition increases. The Company’s hybrid teaching model increases program efficiency and delivers accelerated revenue recognition in certain evening programs.
Educational services and facilities expense. Our educational services and facilities expense increased $13.5 million, or 9.1% to $162.3 million for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023 from $148.7 million in the prior year comparable period. Excluding the Transitional segment educational services and facilities expense of $1.9 million and $3.2 million for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively, our educational services and facilities expense would have increased $14.9 million, or 10.2%. Increased costs were primarily concentrated in instructional expense, facilities expense and books and tools expense.
Instructional expenses increased $7.0 million, driven primarily by higher instructional salaries resulting from higher staffing levels due to increases in our student population and merit salary increases. In addition, the Company is experiencing higher staffing levels at several campuses that have launched the hybrid teaching model as the Company is providing instruction through both the new and traditional learning models for an interim period of time. Further increases resulted from student testing, primarily relating to our nursing program and increased consumables costs driven by a higher student population and inflation.
Facilities expense increased by approximately $4.5 million, driven primarily by a $2.4 million increase in rent expense relating to lease extensions at several campuses, additional space taken at one of our campuses, and non-cash rent expense relating to the new East Point, Georgia campus and the sale-leaseback of our existing Nashville, Tennessee property. In connection with the sale of the Nashville, Tennessee property, the Company entered into a lease agreement allowing the Company to continue to occupy the campus and operate it on a rent-free basis for a period of 15 months. At the consummation of the sale, the Company took the fair value of the 15 month rent free period, valued at $2.3 million, and included the balance in prepaid expenses and other current assets on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets. During the 15-month rent-free period, the Company will straight-line the expense until the rent-free period has expired. Also contributing to the increased costs were higher utility expense driven by inflation and an increase in repairs and maintenance at several campuses.
Books and tools expense increased $3.0 million, driven by a 11.4% increase in student starts year-over-year and vendor price increases.
Educational services and facilities expense, as a percentage of revenue, increased to 42.9% from 42.7% for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively.
Index
Selling, general and administrative expense. Our selling, general and administrative expense increased $26.7 million, or 14.7% to $209.1 million for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023, from $182.4 million in the prior year comparable period. Excluding the Transitional segment selling, general and administrative expense of $1.5 million and $4.1 million for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively, our selling general and administrative expense would have increased $29.3 million, or 16.4%. Increased costs were driven by the following:
Administrative costs increased $20.8 million, driven by several factors including a) an increase in performance-based incentives driven by improved financial performance above plan, b) increased stock-based compensation due to achieving financial targets, c) additional bad debt expense driven by revenue growth of $35.2 million and a slight deterioration in collection rates and d) higher legal costs. In addition, in December of the current year, the Company provided all employees, who are not part of the Company’s bonus incentive plan with a holiday bonus.
Marketing investments increased $4.4 million, helping drive additional student starts, up 11.4% year-over-year. Increased investments were driven in part by continued incremental marketing support for the two new programs that were launched in the third quarter, which included Medical Assistant at our Columbia, MD campus and Electrical & Electronic Systems Technology at our Grand Prairie, TX campus. Marketing investment in the fourth quarter also included the start of an awareness building media campaign for the new East Point, GA campus that is projecting to hold its initial program start in the first quarter of 2024. Despite additional investments in marketing for the year, the total cost to obtain a student remained flat demonstrating the effectiveness of the current marketing campaign.
Student services increased $2.7 million, primarily resulting from costs associated with an increased student population.
Selling, general and administrative expense, as a percentage of revenue, increased to 55.3% from 52.4% for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively.
Gain on sale of assets. Gain on sale of assets was $30.9 million, for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023 resulting from the sale of the Company’s Nashville, Tennessee property during the second quarter of 2023. Net proceeds from the sale were approximately $33.3 million.
Gain on sale of assets was $0.2 million for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022, resulting from the sale of the Suffield, Connecticut campus during the second quarter of 2022. Net proceeds from the sale were approximately $2.4 million.
Impairment of goodwill and long-lived assets. Impairment of goodwill and long-lived assets was $4.2 million for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023 driven by the sale the Nashville, Tennessee property on June 8, 2023. The result of the sale created a change in the trajectory of the fair value of the Nashville, Tennessee operations, and as such, the Company recorded a pre-tax non-cash impairment charge of $3.8 million relating to goodwill and an additional $0.4 million impairment relating to long-lived assets.
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022, as a result of the Company’s annual test of goodwill and long-lived assets, it was determined that there was sufficient evidence to conclude that a $1.0 million impairment existed. The impairment was the result of an assessment of the current market value, as compared to the current carrying value of the assets. Approximately $0.6 million of the Company’s ROU asset was impaired in addition to $0.4 million of long-lived assets.
Net interest income. Net interest income was $2.3 million for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023 compared to $0.2 million in the prior year comparable period. The increase in net interest income was primarily driven by the Company’s investment of its cash reserves into various short-term investments for the full fiscal year ended December 31, 2023, compared to investing cash reserves in the fourth quarter of the prior year. The current year net interest income is partially offset by approximately $0.2 million of additional interest expense relating to a finance lease obligation for our new Nashville, Tennessee property.
Income taxes. Our income tax provision for the year ended December 31, 2023 was $9.6 million, or 27.1% of pre-tax income compared to $3.8 million, or 23.1% of pre-tax income in the prior year. During the year ended December 31, 2023, the increase in effective tax rate was mainly due to a lesser tax benefit derived from restricted stock vesting and higher pre-tax income.
Segment Results of Operations
As of January 1, 2023, the Company’s business is now organized into two reportable business segments: (a) Campus Operations; and (b) Transitional. Based on trends in student demand and our program expansions, there have been more cross-offerings of programs among the various campuses. Given this change, the Company has revised the way it manages the business, evaluates performance, and allocates resources, resulting in an updated segment structure. As a result, the Company has shifted its focus to the two new segments as defined below:
Campus Operations - The Campus Operations segment includes all campuses that are continuing in operation and contribute to the Company’s core operations and performance.
Index
Transitional - The Transitional segment refers to businesses that are marked for closure and are currently being taught-out. As of December 31, 2023, the only campus classified in the Transitional segment is the Somerville, Massachusetts campus. The campus has been fully taught-out and total costs to close the campus were approximately $2.0 million.
We evaluate performance based on operating results. Adjustments to reconcile segment results to consolidated results are included in the caption “Corporate,” which primarily includes unallocated corporate activity.
The following table presents results for the activity for our reportable operating segments for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022:
Year Ended December 31,
% Change
Revenue:
Campus Operations
$
376,602
$
341,440
10.3
%
Transitional
1,468
6,847
-78.6
%
Total
$
378,070
$
348,287
8.6
%
Operating Income (Loss):
Campus Operations
$
47,579
$
49,524
-3.9
%
Transitional
(1,914
)
(430
)
-345.1
%
Corporate
(12,307
)
(32,816
)
62.5
%
Total
$
33,358
$
16,278
104.9
%
Starts:
Campus Operations
16,199
14,541
11.4
%
Transitional
-
-100.0
%
Total
16,199
14,920
8.6
%
Average Population:
Campus Operations
12,875
12,602
2.2
%
Transitional
-77.4
%
Total
12,941
12,894
0.4
%
End of Period Population:
Campus Operations
13,270
12,196
8.8
%
Transitional
-
-100.0
%
Total
13,270
12,388
7.1
%
Year Ended December 31, 2023 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2022
Campus Operations
Operating income was $47.6 million and $49.5 million for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively. The change year-over-year was mainly driven by the following factors:
•
Revenue increased $35.2 million, or 10.3% to $376.6 million for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023 from $341.4 million in the prior year comparable period. The increase in revenue was driven by several factors including student start growth of 11.4% and an increase in average revenue per student of 8.0%, driven in part by the continuing rollout of the Company’s hybrid teaching model in combination with tuition increases. The Company’s hybrid teaching model increases program efficiency and delivers accelerated revenue recognition in certain evening programs.
•
Educational services and facilities expense increased $14.8 million, or 10.2% to $160.4 million for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023 from $145.6 million in the prior year comparable period. Increased costs were primarily concentrated in instructional, facilities expense, and books and tools expense.
o
Instructional expenses increased $7.0 million, driven primarily by higher instructional salaries resulting from higher staffing levels due to increases in our student population and merit salary increases. In addition, the Company is experiencing higher staffing levels at several campuses that have launched the hybrid teaching model as the Company is providing instruction through both the new and traditional learning models for an interim period of time. Further increases resulted from student testing, primarily relating to our nursing program and increased consumables costs driven by a higher student population and inflation.
Index
o
Facilities expense increased by approximately $4.5 million, driven primarily by a $2.4 million increase in rent expense relating to lease extensions at several campuses, additional space taken at one of our campuses, and non-cash rent expense relating to the new East Point, Georgia campus and the sale-leaseback of our existing Nashville, Tennessee property. In connection with the sale of the Nashville, Tennessee property, the Company entered into a lease agreement allowing the Company to continue to occupy the campus and operate it on a rent-free basis for a period of 15 months. At the consummation of the sale, the Company took the fair value of the 15-month rent free period, valued at $2.3 million, and included the balance in prepaid expenses and other current assets on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets. During the 15-month rent-free period, the Company will straight-line the expense until the rent-free period has expired. Also contributing to the increased costs were higher utility expense driven by inflation and an increase in repairs and maintenance at several campuses.
o
Books and tools expense increased $3.0 million, driven by a 11.4% increase in student starts year-over-year.
•
Selling, general and administrative expense increased $19.1 million, or 13.1% to $164.4 million for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023, from $145.3 million in the prior year comparable period. The increase was primarily driven by an increase in administrative costs, marketing investments and student services, all of which are discussed above in the Consolidated Results of Operations.
•
Impairment of goodwill and long-lived assets was $4.2 million and $1.0 million for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively, as discussed above in the Consolidated Results of Operations.
Transitional
On November 3, 2022, the Board of Directors approved a plan to close the Somerville, Massachusetts campus. The owner of the Somerville property has exercised an option to terminate the lease on December 8, 2023 and the Company has since determined not to pursue relocating the campus in this geographic region. The campus has been fully taught-out, and total costs to close the campus were approximately $2.0 million.
•
Revenue decreased $5.3 million, or 78.6% to $1.5 million for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023, from $6.8 million in the prior year comparable period.
•
Total operating expenses decreased $3.9 million, or 53.6% to $3.4 million for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023, from $7.3 million in the prior year comparable period.
Corporate and Other
This category includes unallocated expenses incurred on behalf of the entire Company. Corporate and other expenses were $43.2 million and $33.0 million after excluding a $30.9 million gain in the current year, resulting from the sale of our Nashville, Tennessee property and a $0.2 million gain in the prior year driven by the sale of our former campus property in Suffield, Connecticut. Increased costs were driven by several factors including additional performance-based incentives, stock-based compensation, and an increase in legal costs.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Our primary capital requirements are for maintenance and expansion of our facilities and the development of new programs. Our principal sources of liquidity have been cash provided by operating activities, prior to the termination thereof (described below), borrowings under our credit facility. The following chart summarizes the principal elements of our cash flow for each of the two fiscal years in the period ended December 31, 2023:
Cash Flow Summary
Year Ended December 31,
(In thousands)
Net cash provided by operating activities
$
25,558
$
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
$
7,369
$
(21,354
)
Net cash used in financing activities
$
(2,945
)
$
(12,548
)
Index
As of December 31, 2023, the Company had $80.3 million in cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash, compared to $50.3 million in cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash, including $14.7 million in short-term investments as of December 31, 2022. The change in cash position from prior year was primarily driven by several factors including the sale of our Nashville, Tennessee property, which yielded approximately $33.3 million in proceeds, cashflow generated from operations of $25.9 million, and an increase of $2.1 million relating to additional interest income driven by the investment of cash reserves into various short-term investment vehicles during the year ended December 31, 2023. Partially offsetting the increase in cash position were investments of $41.2 million in capital expenditures, which includes the buildout of the new East Point, Georgia campus and the purchase of the new Levittown, Pennsylvania property for approximately $10.2 million on September 28, 2023. Also contributing to the change in cash year-over-year were incentive compensation payments, share repurchases made under the share repurchase program, and one-time costs incurred in connection with the teach-out of our Somerville, Massachusetts campus.
On May 24, 2022, the Company announced that its Board of Directors had authorized a share repurchase program of up to $30.0 million of the Company’s outstanding Common Stock. The share repurchase program was authorized for 12 months. On February 27, 2023, the Board of Directors extended the share repurchase program for an additional 12 months and authorized the repurchase of an additional $10.0 million of the Company’s Common Stock, for an aggregate of up to $30.6 million in additional repurchases. As of December 31, 2023, the Company has approximately $29.7 million remaining for repurchases.
During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023, the Company repurchased 165,064 shares at a cost of approximately $0.9 million. Total repurchases made since the inception of the share repurchase program through December 31, 2023 were 1,737,478 shares at a total cost of approximately $10.3 million.
Our primary source of cash is tuition collected from our students. The majority of students enrolled at our schools rely on funds received under various government-sponsored student financial aid programs to pay a substantial portion of their tuition and other education-related expenses. The most significant source of student financing is Title IV Programs, which represented approximately 81% of our cash receipts relating to revenues in 2023. Pursuant to applicable regulations, students must apply for a new loan for each academic period. Federal regulations dictate the timing of disbursements of funds under Title IV Programs and loan funds are generally provided by lenders in two disbursements for each academic year. The first disbursement is usually received approximately 31 days after the start of a student’s academic year and the second disbursement is typically received at the beginning of the sixteenth week from the start of the student's academic year. Certain types of grants and other funding are not subject to a 31-day delay. In certain instances, if a student withdraws from a program prior to a specified date, any paid but unearned tuition or prorated Title IV Program financial aid is refunded according to federal, state and accrediting agency standards.
As a result of the significant amount of Title IV Program funds received by our students, we are highly dependent on these funds to operate our business. Any reduction in the level of Title IV Program funds that our students are eligible to receive for tuition payment to us or any restriction on our eligibility to receive Title IV Program funds would have a significant impact on our operations and our financial condition. For more information, See Part I, Item 1A. “Risk Factors - Risks Related to Our Industry”.
Operating Activities
Operating cash flow results primarily from cash received from our students, offset by changes in working capital demands. Working capital can vary at any point in time based on several factors including seasonality, timing of cash receipts and payments and vendor payment terms.
Net cash provided by operating activities was $25.5 million for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023 compared to $0.8 million in the prior year comparable period. The $24.7 million increase was driven by several factors including a $12.0 million increase in accrued expenses primarily driven by additional performance-based incentives in the current year as a result of improved financial performance in addition to a $13.6 million change in accounts receivable, also considering the provision for credit losses and unearned tuition. Increases in accounts receivable were primarily driven by a $29.8 million increase in revenue year-over-year.
Investing Activities
Net cash provided by investing activities was $7.3 million for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023 compared to net cash used in investing activities of $21.4 million in the prior year comparable period. The increase of $28.7 million was driven by several factors including a $30.9 million increase in proceeds from the sale of property and equipment driven by the sale of our Nashville, Tennessee property during the second quarter of 2023, in addition to an increase in net proceeds from investments of $29.5 million. Partially offsetting the cash inflows was an increase in investments in capital expenditures of $31.7 million, which was primarily driven by the buildout of the new East Point, Georgia campus and the purchase of the new Levittown, Pennsylvania property for approximately $10.2 million, which was consummated on September 28, 2023.
We currently lease the majority of all our campuses, except for our Levittown, Pennsylvania property. This property was purchased in September of 2023 for approximately $10.2 million and as of December 31, 2023 has been classified on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as held for sale. Subsequently, on January 30, 2024, the Company closed on a sale-leaseback for this property.
Capital expenditures were 11.0% of revenues in 2023 and are expected to be approximately 15% of revenues in 2024. The significant increase in planned capital expenditures over the prior year will be driven by several factors that include, but are not limited to, the buildout of our new East Point, Georgia area campus, additional space, the planned introduction of three new programs at the Lincoln, Rhode Island campus, and the anticipated introduction of new programs at five other campuses. We expect to fund future capital expenditures with cash generated from operating activities and cash on hand.
Index
Financing Activities
Net cash used in financing activities for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023 and 2022 was $2.9 million and $12.5 million, respectively. The decrease in cash used of $9.6 million was primarily driven by a $8.5 million reduction in repurchases made under the Company’s share repurchase program in the current year, in addition to $1.1 million of dividend payments made in the prior year.
Credit Facility
On November 14, 2019, the Company entered into a senior secured credit agreement (the “Sterling Credit Agreement”) with its lender, Sterling National Bank (the “Lender”), providing for borrowing in the aggregate principal amount of up to $60.0 million (the “Credit Facility”). Initially, the Credit Facility was comprised of four facilities: (1) a $20.0 million senior secured term loan maturing on December 1, 2024 (the “Term Loan”), with monthly interest and principal payments based on a 120-month amortization, with the outstanding balance due on the maturity date; (2) a $10.0 million senior secured delayed draw term loan maturing on December 1, 2024 (the “Delayed Draw Term Loan”), with monthly interest payments for the first 18 months and thereafter monthly payments of interest and principal based on a 120-month amortization and all balances due on the maturity date; (3) a $15.0 million senior secured committed revolving line of credit providing a sublimit of up to $10.0 million for standby letters of credit maturing on November 13, 2022 (the “Revolving Loan”), with monthly payments of interest only; and (4) a $15.0 million senior secured non-restoring line of credit maturing on January 31, 2021 (the “Line of Credit Loan”). The Credit Facility was secured by a first priority lien in favor of the Lender on substantially all of the personal property owned by the Company as well as a pledge of the stock and other rights in the Company’s subsidiaries and mortgages on parcels of real property owned by the Company. The Sterling Credit Agreement was amended on various occasions.
On November 4, 2022, the Company agreed with its Lender to terminate the Sterling Credit Agreement and the remaining Revolving Loan. The Lender agreed to allow the Company’s existing letters of credit to remain outstanding, provided that they are cash collateralized. As of December 31, 2023, the letters of credit, in the aggregate outstanding principal amount of $4.1 million, remained outstanding, were cash collateralized, and were classified as restricted cash on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. As of December 31, 2023, the Company did not have a credit facility and did not have any debt outstanding.
On February 16, 2024, the Company entered into a secured credit agreement (the “Fifth Third Credit Agreement”) with Fifth Third Bank, National Association (the “Bank”), pursuant to which the Company, as borrower, has obtained a revolving credit facility in the aggregate principal amount of $40.0 million including a $10.0 million letter of credit sublimit and a $20.0 million accordion feature (the “Facility”), the proceeds of which are to be used for working capital, general corporate and certain other permitted purposes. See Part II. Item 8. “Financial Statements and Supplemental Data - Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - Note 19 Subsequent Events”.
Index
Climate Change
Climate change has not had and is not expected to have a significant impact on our operations.
Contractual Obligations
Current portion of Long-Term Debt, Long-Term Debt and Lease Commitments. As of December 31, 2023, we have no debt outstanding. We lease offices, educational facilities and various items of equipment for varying periods through the year 2045 under basic annual rentals.
As of December 31, 2023, there were three new leases and five lease modifications that resulted in noncash re-measurements of the related right-of-use asset and operating lease liability of $10.5 million. In addition, during the fourth quarter of 2023, the Company entered into a finance lease and recorded a $16.0 million Right of Use (“ROU”) Asset and liability.
We had no off-balance sheet arrangements as of December 31, 2023, except for existing surety bonds. We are required to post surety bonds on behalf of our campuses and education representatives with multiple states to maintain authorization to conduct our business. At December 31, 2023, we posted surety bonds in the aggregate amount of approximately $16.0 million. These off-balance sheet arrangements do not adversely impact our liquidity or capital resources.
As of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, we had outstanding extensions of credit commitments to our active students of $33.6 million and $30.5 million, respectively. These are institutional extensions of credit and no cash is advanced to students. The full extension of credit amount is not guaranteed unless the student completes the program. The institutional extensions of credit are considered commitments because the students are required to fund their education using these funds and they are not reported in our Consolidated Financial Statements.
SEASONALITY AND OUTLOOK
Seasonality
Our revenue and operating results normally fluctuate as a result of seasonal variations in our business, principally due to changes in total student population. Student population varies due to new student enrollments, graduations and student attrition. Historically, our schools have had lower student populations in our first and second quarters and we have experienced larger class starts in the third quarter and higher student attrition in the first half of the year. The growth that we generally experience in the second half of the year is largely dependent on a successful high school recruiting season. We recruit high school students several months ahead of their scheduled start dates and, as a consequence, while we have visibility on the number of students who have expressed interest in attending our schools, we cannot predict with certainty the actual number of new student enrollments in any given year and the related impact on revenue. Our expenses, however, typically do not vary significantly over the course of the year with changes in our student population and revenue.
Effect of Inflation
Inflation has not had a material effect on our operations except for some inflationary pressures on certain instructional expenses including consumables and in instances where potential students have not wanted to incur additional debt or increased travel expense.

---

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
ITEM 7A.
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
We are a smaller reporting company as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act and are not required to provide the information otherwise required under this item.

---

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
ITEM 8.
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
See “Index to Consolidated Financial Statements” on page of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

---

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS
ITEM 9.
CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.
Index

---

ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
ITEM 9A.
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, after evaluating, together with management, the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e)) as of December 31, 2023 have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective to reasonably ensure that material information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified by Securities and Exchange Commission’s Rules and Forms and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
During the quarter ended December 31, 2023, there has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting and Attestation Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The management of the Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. The Company’s internal control system was designed to provide reasonable assurance to the Company’s management and Board of Directors regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.
Management assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2023, based on the framework set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013). Based on its assessment, management believes that, as of December 31, 2023, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting is effective.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
The Company’s independent auditors, Deloitte & Touche LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, audited the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2023, as stated in their report included in this Form 10-K that follows.

---

ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 9B.
OTHER INFORMATION
During the three months ended December 31, 2023, none of the Company's directors or officers (as defined in Rule 16a-1(f) of the Exchange Act) adopted, terminated or modified a "Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement" or "non-Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement" (as such terms are defined in Item 408 of Regulation S-K).

---

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
ITEM 10.
DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Directors and Executive Officers
Certain information required by this Item 10 of Part III is incorporated by reference from a definitive proxy statement or an amendment to this Annual Report on Form 10-K that will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after December 31, 2023.
Code of Ethics
We have adopted a Code of Business Ethics and Conduct applicable to our directors, officers and employees and certain other persons, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer. A copy of our Code of Business Ethics and Conduct is available on our website at www.lincolntech.edu. If any amendments to or waivers from the Code of Business Ethics and Conduct are made, we will disclose such amendments or waivers on our website.

---

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
ITEM 11.
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The information required by this Item 11 of Part III is incorporated by reference from a definitive proxy statement or an amendment to this Annual Report on Form 10-K that will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after December 31, 2023.

---

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS
ITEM 12.
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
The information required by this Item 12 of Part III is incorporated by reference from a definitive proxy statement or an amendment to this Annual Report on Form 10-K that will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after December 31, 2023.

---

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
ITEM 13.
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
The information required by this Item 13 of Part III is incorporated by reference from a definitive proxy statement or an amendment to this Annual Report on Form 10-K that will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after December 31, 2023.

---

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES
ITEM 14.
PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
The information required by this Item 14 of Part III is incorporated by reference from a definitive proxy statement or an amendment to this Annual Report on Form 10-K that will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after December 31, 2023.
PART IV.

---

ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
ITEM 15.
EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
1.
Financial Statements
See “Index to Consolidated Financial Statements” on page of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
2.
Financial Statement Schedules
See “Index to Consolidated Financial Statements” on page of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
3.
Exhibits Required by Securities and Exchange Commission Regulation S-K
Exhibit
Number
Description
3.1
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company (incorporated by reference to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1/A (Registration No. 333-123644) filed June 7, 2005.
Index
3.2
Certificate of Amendment, dated November 14, 2019, to the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-3 filed October 6, 2020).
3.3
Bylaws of the Company, as amended on March 8, 2019 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed April 30, 2020).
4.1
Specimen Stock Certificate evidencing shares of Common Stock (incorporated by reference to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1/A (Registration No. 333-123644) filed June 21, 2005).
4.2
Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of November 14, 2019, between the Company and the investors parties thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed November 14, 2019).
4.3
Description of Securities of the Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed March 9, 2021).
10.1+
Employment Agreement, dated as of December 13, 2022, between the Company and Scott M. Shaw
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed December 16, 2022).
10.2+
Employment Agreement, dated as of December 13, 2022, between the Company and Brian K. Meyers
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed December 16, 2022).
10.3+
Employment Agreement dated as of December 13, 2022 between the Company and Chad D Nyce (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed December 16, 2022).
10.4+
Lincoln Educational Services Corporation 2020 Long-Term Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.16 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed June 5, 2020).
10.5+
Lincoln Educational Services Corporation Severance and Retention Policy (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed November 7, 2022).
10.6
Securities Purchase Agreement, dated as of November 14, 2019, between the Company and the investor parties thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed November 14, 2019).
10.7
Credit Agreement, dated as of November 14, 2019, among the Company, Lincoln Technical Institute, Inc. and its subsidiaries, and Sterling National Bank (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed November 14, 2019).
10.8
First Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated as of November 10, 2020, among the Company, Lincoln Technical Institute, Inc. and its subsidiaries, and Sterling National Bank (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed November 12, 2020).
10.9
Second Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated as of May 23, 2022, among the Company, Lincoln Technical Institute, Inc. and its subsidiaries, and Webster Bank, National Bank (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 24, 2022).
10.10
Third Amendment to the Credit Agreement, dated as of August 5, 2022, among the Company, Lincoln Technical Institute, Inc. and its subsidiaries, and Webster Bank, National Bank (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed August 8, 2022).
10.11
Consent and Waiver Letter Agreement, dated as of September 23, 2021, by and among the Company and certain of its subsidiaries and Sterling National Bank (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed September 28, 2021).
10.12
Form of Indemnification Agreement between the Company and each director of the Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed November 14, 2019).
Index
10.13
Indemnification Agreement between the Company and John A. Bartholdson (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed November 14, 2019).
10.14
Credit Agreement, dated as of February 16, 2024, among the Company and its subsidiaries and Fifth Third Bank, National Association (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed February 23,2024).
21*
Subsidiaries of the Company.
23*
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.
24*
Power of Attorney (included on the Signature page of this Annual Report on Form 10-K).
31.1 *
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2 *
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32 *
Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
97.1*
Compensation Recovery Policy
101*
The following financial statements from Lincoln Educational Services Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2023, formatted in iXBRL: (i) Consolidated Statements of Operations, (ii) Consolidated Balance Sheets, (iii) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, (iv) Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive (Loss) Income, (v) Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity and (vi) the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, tagged as blocks of text and in detail.
Cover Page Interactive Data File (formatted as Inline iXBRL and contained in Exhibit 101*.
*
Filed herewith.
+
Indicates management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement required to be filed or incorporated by reference as an exhibit to this Form 10-K pursuant to Item 15(b) of Form 10-K.