EDGAR 10-K Filing

Company CIK: 1429764
Filing Year: 2022
Filename: 1429764_10-K_2022_0001493152-22-007015.json

---

ITEM 1. BUSINESS
ITEM 1. BUSINESS.
Overview
Blink Charging Co., through its wholly-owned subsidiaries, is a leading owner, operator, and provider of electric vehicle (“EV”) charging equipment and networked EV charging services in the rapidly growing U.S. and international markets for EVs. Blink offers residential and commercial EV charging equipment and services, enabling EV drivers to recharge at various location types. Blink’s principal line of products and services includes its nationwide Blink EV charging network (the “Blink Network”) and Blink EV charging equipment, also known as electric vehicle supply equipment (“EVSE”), and other EV-related services. The Blink Network is a proprietary, cloud-based system that operates, maintains, and manages Blink charging stations and handles the associated charging data, back-end operations, and payment processing. The Blink Network provides property owners, managers, parking companies, and state and municipal entities (“Property Partners”), among other types of commercial customers, with cloud-based services that enable the remote monitoring and management of EV charging stations. The Blink Network also provides EV drivers with vital station information, including station location, availability, and fees (if applicable).
In order to capture more revenues derived from providing EV charging equipment to commercial customers and to help differentiate Blink in the EV infrastructure market, Blink offers Property Partners a comprehensive range of solutions for EV charging equipment and services that generally fall into one of the business models below, differentiated by who bears the costs of installation, equipment, maintenance, and the percentage of revenue shared.
● In our Blink-owned turnkey business model, Blink incurs the costs of the charging equipment and installation. We own and operate the EV charging station and provide connectivity of the charging station to the Blink Network. In this model, which favors recurring revenues, Blink incurs most costs associated with the EV charging stations; thus, Blink retains substantially all EV charging revenues after deducting network connectivity and processing fees.
● In our Blink-owned hybrid business model, Blink incurs the costs of the charging equipment while the Property Partner incurs the costs of installation. We own and operate the EV charging station and provide connectivity of the charging station to the Blink Network. In this model, the Property Partner incurs the installation costs associated with the EV station; thus, Blink shares a more generous portion of the EV charging revenues with the Property Partner after deducting network connectivity and processing fees.
● In our host-owned business model, the Property Partner purchases, owns and operates the Blink EV charging station and incurs the installation costs. Blink works with the Property Partner, providing site recommendations, connectivity to the Blink Network, payment processing, and optional maintenance services. In this model, the Property Partner retains and keeps all the EV charging revenues after deducting network connectivity and processing fees.
● In our Blink-as-a-Service model, Blink owns and operates the EV charging station, while the Property Partner incurs the installation costs. The Property Partner pays to Blink a fixed monthly fee and keeps all the EV charging revenues after deducting network connectivity and processing fees
Blink also operates a ride-sharing program through the Company’s wholly owned subsidiary, BlueLA Rideshare, LLC (“BlueLA”) and the City of Los Angeles which allows customers the ability to rent electric vehicles through a subscription service.
As part of Blink’s mission to facilitate the adoption of EVs through the deployment and operation of EV charging infrastructure globally, we are dedicated to slowing climate change by reducing greenhouse gas emissions caused by road vehicles. With the goal of leading the build out of EV charging infrastructure and of maximizing Blink’s share of the EV charging market, we have established strategic commercial, municipal and retail partnerships across industry verticals and encompassing numerous transit/destination locations, including airports, auto dealers, healthcare/medical, hotels, mixed-use, municipal sites, multifamily residential and condos, parks and recreation areas, parking lots, religious institutions, restaurants, retailers, schools and universities, stadiums, supermarkets, transportation hubs, and workplace locations.
During 2021, Blink was awarded several new prominent customers including General Motors, Ford, Jaguar-Land Rover, Hyundai, Kia, Subaru, AutoNation, Berkshire-Hathaway Automotive, Bridgestone, the City of San Antonio, the Related Group, and others. During 2020, Blink awarded several new prominent customers, including Cushman & Wakefield, Reef Technology, Lehigh Valley Health, St. Luke’s University Health Network, Lion Electric, and several others that expand Blink’s potential for unit sales and deployments. Commensurate with these new business relationships, we also forged critical strategic relationships with organizations that directly or indirectly influence EV charging stations purchase decisions. Examples include Sustainable Westchester in New York and Clean Cities Organizations in Virginia, Vermont and Ohio.
In 2021, Blink opened a new office in Noida, India, adjacent to New Delhi. The new office adds to the Company’s expanding U.S. capacity to develop and innovate new software capabilities to better meet the needs of an evolving EV charging landscape, while also serving as a key hub for operations serving the Asia Pacific and Middle East regions. The new office in India is the first within the country for Blink and is part of the Company’s strategic goal to grow the global engineering team and develop an operational hub to facilitate expansion into new international regions.
As of December 31, 2021, since our inception and excluding Blue Corner, we sold, deployed or acquired through acquisitions 20,684 chargers, of which, 7,366 were connected to the Blink Network (4,611 Level 2 publicly accessible commercial chargers, 1,536 Level 2 private commercial chargers, 91 DC Fast Charging EV publicly accessible chargers, 34 DC Fast Charging EV private chargers, and 1,095 residential Level 2 Blink EV chargers), 920 Level 2 chargers and 45 DC Fast Chargers are pending to be commissioned to the Blink Network, and the remaining 12,353 were non-networked, on other networks or international sales or deployments (159 Level 2 commercial chargers, 6 DC Fast Charging chargers, 10,099 residential Level 2 Blink EV chargers, 1,034 sold to other US networks, 990 sold internationally and 64 deployed internationally).
In addition, as of February 3, 2022, since its inception, our recently acquired subsidiary, Blue Corner, sold or deployed 11,677 independent charge points, all of which were on Blue Corner’s network, which was comprised of 4,566 Level 2 publicly accessible commercial independent charge points, 19 DC Fast Charging publicly assessable commercial independent charge points and 7,092 private L2, private DC Fast Charging and private residential independent charge points. The charger units reported herein are net of swap-out or replacement units.
Industry Overview
The market for plug-in electric vehicles experienced significant growth in recent years. In response to consumer demands, electric cars now feature extended ranges and improved performance. Notable events in 2020 further propelled the EV industry. Stay-at-home orders and the resulting reductions in global carbon dioxide emissions showcased the potential of cleaner, lower-emission air quality worldwide. Battery technology advances have allowed EVs to achieve approximate cost parity with internal combustion engine vehicles and have extended driving range and consumer confidence. Finally, the new United States administration’s focus on climate initiatives and its large-scale commitment to expanding EV charging infrastructure has spurred widespread interest and promotion of the EV industry.
Electric vehicle demand has also been spurred by federal, state, and local incentives and rebates for both vehicles and their required charging infrastructure. For example, California, Oregon, New York, Maryland, Massachusetts, and other states have created mandates for EVs to achieve more than 6.8 million EVs on the road by 2030. Further, a shift towards EV car-sharing has boosted the transition to EV fleets, leading to increased EV charging station demand. In response to consumer demand and governmental regulations, major automakers and OEMs have accelerated the development and production of a robust portfolio of electric vehicles. More than 70 EV models are currently available from automakers such as Tesla, Nissan, Kia, GM, Ford, Fiat, BMW, Mercedes-Benz, Audi, Volkswagen, Toyota, Mitsubishi, Land Rover, and Porsche and an estimated 62 more are scheduled to become available in 2022. The International Energy Agency projects global EV sales to grow from 3 million vehicles in 2020 to about 25 million vehicles in 2030, a 24 percent compound annual growth rate (“CAGR”) over this time period.
These market demands well position Blink for rapid growth in its EV charging network, the number of its members, and its site host property partners’ expansion. Blink has been preparing for this high-growth environment through its planning initiatives, including securing large national and international strategic partnerships and agreements, and further developing the Company’s technology. These strategic actions will help ensure the Company is well positioned to meet the growing infrastructure demand both in the United States and globally. In addition to meeting the required demand for EV charging infrastructure, Blink’s unique, owner-operator focused business models help the Company significantly benefit from increased utilization as the industry expands through revenue share at Blink-owned charging stations.
Our EV Charging Solutions
We offer a variety of EV charging products and services to Property Partners and EV drivers.
EV Charging Solutions
● Level 2. We offer Level 2 (AC) EV charging equipment, which is ideal for commercial and residential use, that has the standard J1772 connector, which is compatible with all major auto manufacturer electric vehicle models. Our commercial Level 2 chargers consist of the IQ 200 family which is available in pedestal wall mount and pole mount configurations. The IQ 200 family provides an optional cable management system with the ability to connect to our Blink Network. Our non-networked residential product, Blink HQ 150, is available in a wall-mount configuration and offers a delay start feature that allows users to optimize charging when utility rates are lowest. Level 2 charging stations typically provide a full charge in two to eight hours. Level 2 chargers are ideally suited for low-cost installations and frequently used parking locations, such as workplace, multifamily residential, retail and mixed-use, parking garages, municipalities, colleges/schools, hospitals and airports.
● In January 2022, we announced the next generation of Level 2 chargers to enhance our offering for the residential and the Fleet multifamily residential markets. The HQ 200 Basic is a non-networked residential product and the HQ 200 Smart is a networked residential product. The MQ 200 product is an ideal product for the Fleet and multifamily residential markets.
● Mobile Charger. Blink offers the IQ 200-M Level 2 charger for the mobile/emergency charging market which requires a portable charger to be used for roadside or other use cases where a connection to the electricity grid is not available.
● Advertising Solution. In January 2022, Blink launched its advertising and charging solution in one product. This product, Vision IQ 200, consists of static and dynamic advertising and Level 2 charge targeted at the retail, hospitality and high traffic locations.
● DCFC. Blink offers a complete line of DC Fast Charging equipment (“DCFC”) that range from 50kW to 175kW, support the ‘CHAdeMo’ and the CCS1 connector, and typically provide an 80% charge in less than 30 minutes. Installation of DCFC stations and grid requirements are typically greater than Level 2 charging stations and are ideally suited for transportation hubs and locations between travel destinations.
● Blink’s rapid expansion into DCFC sites is supported by reseller type relationships with all the major equipment manufacturers globally. This assures Blink access to the best-in-class equipment for each specific requirement, allowing Blink to provide the best possible charging solutions for its customers. The third-party DCFC’s operate on the Blink Network as all of our other products. The third-party equipment currently operating on Blink’s network include ABB, BTC, Signet, and Tritium.
● International Products. Blink offers Level 2 AC and DC products for the international markets targeted at the residential, workplace, retail, parking garages, leasing companies, hospitality and other locations requiring a Level 2 or a DC Fast charger. These products are available with the Type 2 and CCS 2 connectors.
● Blink Network. Blink Network is a cloud-based product that manages our network of EV chargers for remote monitoring, management, payment processing, customer support and other features required for operating the Blink network of EV charging locations.
● Mobile Apps. Blink offers mobile apps (iOS and Android) for EV drivers to signup, locate, charge and pay at the EV chargers.
● Fleet Management. In January 2022, Blink announced the Fleet Management Portal targeted at commercial, municipal and federal fleets that are interested in electrifying their fleets for planning, managing, and optimizing their fleets for departure and energy costs.
Competitive Advantages/Operational Strengths
Long-Term Contracts with Property Owners. We have strategic and often long-term agreements with location exclusivity with Property Partners across numerous transit/destination locations, including airports, car dealers, healthcare/medical, hotels, mixed-use, municipal locations, multifamily residential and condo, parks and recreation areas, parking lots, religious institutions, restaurants, retailers, schools and universities, stadiums, supermarkets, transportation hubs, and workplace locations. Property Partners include well-recognized companies, large municipalities and local businesses. Representative examples are City of Miami Beach, City of Chula Vista, City of Phoenix, City of Portland, University of San Diego, Ohlone College, ACE Parking, Icon Parking, SP+ Parking, iPark, LAZ Parking, Reef Parking, Federal Realty, Equity Residential, Related Group, Johnson & Johnson, Kaiser Permanente, Blessing Healthcare, Sony Pictures Entertainment, Starbucks, JBG Associates, Kroger Company, Fred Meyer Stores, Inc., Fry’s Food & Drug, Inc., Raising Cane’s, McDonald’s, Carl’s Jr., Burger King, and Ralphs Grocery Company. We continue to establish new contracts with Property Partners that previously secured our services independently or had contracts with the EV service providers that we acquired in the past.
Differentiated but Flexible Business Models. We own, operate and supply proprietary electric vehicle charging equipment and networked EV charging services. We believe that our ability to flexibly provide various business models, including a comprehensive turnkey solution, to Property Partners and leverage our technology to meet both Property Partners’ and EV drivers’ needs provides us competitive advantage in addition to more compelling long-term growth opportunities than possible through equipment sales only.
Ownership and Control of EV Charging Stations and Services. We own a large percentage of our charging stations, which is a significant differentiation between us and some of our primary competitors. This ownership model allows us to control the settings and pricing for our EV charging services, service the equipment as necessary, and have more effective brand management and price uniformity. As for those stations that we do not own, we are using our best efforts to encourage their owners to keep the stations operating in good order and, in some cases, to replace faulty stations with our new charging stations equipment.
Experience with Products and Services of Other EV Charging Service Providers. From our early days and through our acquisitions, we have had the experience of owning and operating EV charging equipment manufactured by other EV charging service providers, including General Electric, ChargePoint, and SemaConnect. This experience has provided us with the working knowledge of other equipment manufacturers’ benefits and drawbacks and their applicable EV charging networks.
Our Growth Strategy
Our objective is to continue becoming a leading provider of EV charging solutions by deploying mass-scale EV charging infrastructure. By doing so, we aim to enable the accelerated growth of EV adoption and the EV industry. Key elements of our growth strategy include:
● Pursue Strategic Opportunities to Expand Blink-Owned Turnkey and Hybrid Models. We have structured our business to identify and pursue opportunities to develop Blink’s owner and operator business model with locations with potential high utilization, where grant monies are available, and where we can realize long-term benefit for the EV charging location and establish long-term recurring revenue relationships.
● Relentless Focus on Customer Satisfaction. We aim to increase overall customer satisfaction with new and existing Property Partners and EV drivers by upgrading and expanding the EV charging footprint throughout high-demand, high-density geographic areas. Another objective is to improve productivity and utilization of existing EV charging stations and enhance the valuable features of our EV charging station hardware and the Blink Network.
● Continue to Invest in Technology Innovations. We will continue to enhance the product offerings available in our EV charging hardware, cloud-based software, and networking capability. This includes the design and launch of our next generation of EV charging solutions, including accelerating the charge currents currently available in EV charging hardware and new, robust Blink Network features to stay ahead of the competition. Our key service solutions allow us to remain technology agnostic so that, if market conditions shift, we have the option to leverage pure-play hardware providers to augment our products. In 2021, we opened a new office near New Delhi, India. The new office in India is the first within the country for Blink and is part of the Company’s strategic goal to grow the global engineering team and develop an operational hub to facilitate expansion into new international regions.
● Strengthen and Support our Human Capital. Our experienced employees and management team are our most valuable resources. Attracting, training, and retaining key personnel has been and will remain critical to our success. To achieve our human capital goals, we intend to stay focused on providing our personnel with entrepreneurial opportunities to expand our business within their areas of expertise. We will also continue to provide our personnel with personal and professional growth opportunities, including additional training, performance-based incentives such as opportunities for stock ownership, and other competitive benefits.
● Expand Sales and Marketing Resources. We intend to invest in sales and marketing infrastructure to capitalize on the growth in the market and expand our go-to-market strategy. Today, we use a direct sales force, as well as resellers, and will continue expanding through the use of independent sales agents, utilities, solar distributors, contractors, automotive manufacturers and dealers.
● Seek Strategic Acquisition Opportunities. We seek domestic and international acquisition opportunities which will allow us to expeditiously expand our footprint of EV charging station locations, product offerings, and enhance our Blink Network.
● Leverage Our Early Mover Advantage. We continue to leverage our extensive and defendable first-mover advantage and the digital customer experience we have created for both EV drivers and Property Partners. We believe that tens of thousands of Blink driver registrants appreciate the value of transacting charging sessions on an established, robust network. Blink chargers are deployed across the United States, and the tendency, among users, is to stay within one consistent network.
● Appropriately Capitalize Our Business. We continue to pursue new potential capital sources to deliver critical operational objectives and the necessary resources to execute our overall strategy. The EV charging industry as a whole is undercapitalized to deliver the full potential of the expected EV market growth in the near future. We expect to retain our leadership position with new growth capital as required.
● International Expansion. On May 10, 2021, the Company, through its wholly owned subsidiary in the Netherlands, Blink Holdings, B.V., closed on the acquisition from the shareholders of Blue Corner NV, a Belgian company (“Blue Corner”), of all of the outstanding capital stock of Blue Corner. Headquartered in Belgium, with sales representative offices in several other European cities, Blue Corner owns and operates an EV charging network across Europe. The acquisition of Blue Corner was made to enter the European market and provide an opportunity to expand the Company’s footprint in this region. As a key contributor to the expanding EV landscape, we are continuously looking for opportunities to strategically increase our global assets while also making EV charging more accessible. International expansion is fundamental to our rapid growth and will accelerate the success we are already achieving in the region.
Sales
Blink’s sales organization builds and maintains long-term business relationships with our customers by utilizing our four core business models. These business models provide a high degree of flexibility to match host location goals and objectives for EV charging with our industry-leading equipment acquisition solutions. Our team identifies locations that have the potential to create long-term, recurring value for the Property Partner and Blink. Sales personnel are able to pivot to traditional equipment sales or charging-as-a-service models when, and if, a location is not identified as a promising generator of future recurring revenues. The team strives to maintain a balance between equipment sales that grow revenue today, and site locations that have potential to generate strong revenues in the future under our owner-operator business models.
Blink also engages with strategic reseller partners across a range of vertical markets both within the U.S. and globally. These resellers typically have unique relationships or capabilities within their respective markets and provide Blink with additional sales opportunities. These resellers amplify Blink’s sales reach and are authorized to sell our EV charging hardware, software services (connectivity to Blink Network), and extended warranty service plans, to strategic site hosts and in specific locations.
Blink is making further inroads into the residential charging station market where we sell Level 2 chargers through various internet channels, such as Amazon, Walmart.com, Lowes.com, and other online retailers, to reach the single-family residential charging market in the United States.
During 2021, Blink awarded several new prominent customers including General Motors, Ford, Jaguar-Land Rover, Hyundai, Kia, Subaru, AutoNation, Berkshire-Hathaway Automotive, Bridgestone, the City of San Antonio, the Related Group, and others. During 2020, Blink awarded several new prominent customers, including Cushman & Wakefield, Reef Technology, Lehigh Valley Health, St. Luke’s University Health Network, Lion Electric, and several others, that expand Blink’s potential for unit sales and deployments. Commensurate with these new business relationships, we also forged critical strategic relationships with organizations that directly or indirectly influence EV charging station purchase decisions. Examples include Sustainable Westchester in New York, and Clean Cities Organizations in Virginia, Vermont and Ohio.
In addition to adding sales personnel within key markets, we solidified our organizational structure through hiring talented business development professionals and establishing a new account management team to onboard customers and maintain long-term relationships.
Our in-house staff performs a variety of marketing activities. Our marketing team works to promote and sell our services to property owners and managers, parking companies, and EV drivers. We also utilize marketing and communication channels, including press releases, email marketing, website (www.blinkcharging.com), pay-per-click advertising, social media marketing, webinars, sponsorships and partnerships, advertising, and conferences. Our websites’ information is not, and will not be deemed, a part of this Annual Report or incorporated into any other filings we make with the SEC.
We continue to invest in improving our company-owned stations’ service and maintenance and those stations with service and maintenance plans and expanding our cloud-based network capabilities. We anticipate continuing to grow our revenues by (i) selling our next generation of EV charging equipment to current as well as to new Property Partners, which includes airports, auto dealers, healthcare/medical, hotels, mixed-use, municipal locations, multifamily residential and condos, parks and recreation areas, parking lots, religious institutions, restaurants, retailers, schools and universities, stadiums, supermarkets, transportation hubs, and workplace locations, and (ii) expanding our sales channels to wholesale distributors, utilities, auto original equipment manufacturers (“OEMs”), solar integrators, and dealers, which will include implementing EV charging station occupancy fees (after charging is completed, fees for remaining connected to the charging station beyond an allotted grace period), and subscription plans for EV drivers on our company-owned public charging locations.
Our Customers and Partners
We have strategic partnerships across numerous transit/destination locations, including airports, auto dealers, healthcare/medical, hotels, mixed-use and municipal locations, multifamily residential and condos, parks and recreation areas, parking lots, religious institutions, restaurants, retailers, schools and universities, stadiums, supermarkets, transportation hubs, and workplace locations. We have hundreds of Property Partners that include well-recognized companies, large municipalities, and local businesses. We strive to engage all Blink-owned turnkey and hybrid property partners with exclusive EV charging contracts. This strategy further supports our owner-operator model to generate recurring revenue for both the Property Partner and Blink. Representative examples are McDonald’s, Sony Pictures, Caltrans, Porsche Design Tower, City of Azusa, City of Chula Vista, City of Springfield, City of Tucson, Federal Realty, Fred Meyer Stores, Inc., Fry’s Food & Drug, Inc., JBG Associates, LLC, Kroger Company and Ralphs Grocery Company. We continue to establish new contracts with Property Partners that previously secured our services independently or had contracts with the EV services providers that we acquired, including Ecotality, the former owner of the Blink-related assets.
Our revenues are primarily derived from fees charged to EV drivers for EV charging in public locations, EV charging hardware sales, government grants, and sales of equipment warranties. EV charging fees to drivers are based on an hourly rate, by energy dispensed per kilowatt-hour (“kWh”), or by session. Such fees are calculated based on various factors, including associated station costs and local electricity tariffs. EV charging hardware is sold to our Property Partners such as InterEnergy, Green Commuter, Nashville Music Center, Wendy’s, and other Property Partners engaged with our host-owned business model. Other income sources from EV charging services are network fees, extended warranty fees, membership fees, and payment processing fees paid by our Property Partners. Blink generates revenues from its ride-sharing program through BlueLA and the City of Los Angeles which allows customers the ability to rent electric vehicles through a subscription service.
We teamed up with Google Maps to make locating EV charging stations straightforward and accessible. Our charging stations are displayed in Google Maps, along with other relevant information.
We are focused on international expansion and have made significant progress in the last year at expanding our business across the globe, focusing primarily on Europe, Israel, and Latin America. In May 2021, we purchased the Belgian EV car charging company Blue Corner NV, managed through our international holdings subsidiary, Blink Holdings BV in Amsterdam, the Netherlands. Additionally, we utilize Blink Charging Ltd. for our expansion in Israel and Blink Hellas SA for our expansion in Greece. We are in the process of incorporating numerous subsidiaries in Latin America as we further concentrate our international efforts. Finally, we established a new software development team in India, managed by our subsidiary Blink Charging Software Solutions Ltd.
We expanded our efforts on diversification, public service, and focus on renewable energy. We established a new committee of the Board of Directors, the Environmental, Social & Governance Committee (ESG), and adopted a new diversity statement. Our Human Resources Department led several successful climate initiatives throughout the year, including a cleanup of Miami Beach. Although we are still primarily working remotely and have not required employees to return to our new offices, our company culture is stronger than ever.
Our Competition
The EV charging equipment and service market is highly competitive, and we expect the market to become increasingly competitive as new entrants enter this growing market. Our products and services compete on product performance and features, the total cost of ownership, sales capabilities, financial stability, brand recognition, product reliability, and the installed base’s size. Our existing competition currently includes ChargePoint, which manufactures EV charging equipment and operates the ChargePoint Network, and Evgo, which offers home and public charging with pay-as-you-go and subscription models. Other entrants into the connected EV charging station equipment market include Volta, Clipper Creek, SemaConnect, and EV Connect. We believe these additional competitors struggle with gaining the necessary network traction but could gain momentum in the future. While Tesla does offer EV charging services, the connector type currently restricts the chargers to Tesla vehicles only. Many other EV charging companies offer non-networked or “basic” chargers with limited customer leverage but could provide a low-cost solution for basic charger needs in commercial and home locations.
Our competitive advantage in this market includes our exclusive, long-term contracts with our Property Partners and flexible business models. We offer our EV charging station equipment and provide access to a robust EV charging network.
Government Grants
Blink has established a full-time dedicated team to identify and process federal and state funding opportunities for EV charging infrastructure development. Blink is committed to pursuing EV charging development grant opportunities in all 50 states. Funding sources include the United States Department of Energy, the United States Department of Transportation, the VW mitigation settlement trust fund, and funding initiatives from utility service providers.
Government Regulation and Incentives
State, regional and local regulations for installing EV charging stations vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction and may include permitting requirements, inspection requirements, licensing of contractors, and certifications. Compliance with such regulations may cause installation delays.
Currently, we apply charging fees by the kWh for our services in states that permit this policy and hourly and by session for our services in states that do not permit per kWh pricing. California, Colorado, District of Columbia, Florida, Hawaii, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New York, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Utah, Virginia, and Washington have determined that companies that sell EV charging services to the public will not be regulated as utilities, allowing us to charge fees based on kWh usage. These individual state determinations are not binding on any other regulator or jurisdiction. However, they demonstrate a trend in the way states view the industry. Other jurisdictions are in the process of adopting such reforms.
We intend to continue to vigorously seek additional grants, loans, rebates, subsidies, and incentives as cost-effective means of reducing our capital investment in the promotion, purchase and installation of charging stations where applicable. We expect these incentives, rebates, and tax credits to be critical to our future growth. Additionally, some incentives are currently offered to encourage electric vehicle adoption at the federal, state and local levels. The Federal government provides a personal income tax credit for qualified plug-in electric vehicles, with a minimum credit of $2,500 and a maximum of $7,500, depending on vehicle weight and battery capacity. Such credits begin to phase out when the vehicle manufacturer reaches certain production levels. States such as California, Colorado, Delaware, Louisiana, Massachusetts, New York, and Rhode Island offer various rebates, grants, and tax credits to incentivize EV and EVSE purchases.
CESQG
As a Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generator (“CESQG”), we generate a limited quantity of hazardous waste, mainly solvent contaminated wipes, which are transported to local solid waste facilities. Scrapped electronic boards are transported to a local recycler. A CESQG of hazardous waste is defined as a generator that:
● produces no more than 100 kg (220 lbs.) of hazardous waste per month;
● produces no more than 1 kg (2.2 lbs.) of acutely hazardous waste per month;
● does not accumulate more than 1,000 kg (2,204 lbs.) of hazardous waste on-site; and
● a CESQG has no time limit for accumulation.
The use of our machinery and equipment must comply with the following applicable laws and regulations, including safety and environmental regulations:
● General Safety for All Employees - Includes health hazard communication, emergency exit plans, electrical safety-related work practices, office safety, and hand-powered tools.
● Technicians and Engineers - Only authorized persons (technicians and engineers) perform product testing and repair in the facility’s production and engineering areas, including those engineers involved in field service work. Regulations include control of hazardous energy and personal protective equipment.
● Logisticians - Includes forklift operations performed only by certified shipping/receiving personnel and material handling and storage.
We fully comply with the general industry category’s environmental regulations applicable to us as a CESQG.
OSHA
We are subject to the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970, as amended (“OSHA”). OSHA establishes specific employer responsibilities, including maintaining a workplace free of recognized hazards likely to cause death or serious injury, compliance with standards promulgated by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration and various recordkeeping, disclosure and procedural requirements. Multiple standards, including standards for notices of hazards, safety in excavation and demolition work and the handling of asbestos, may apply to our operations. We are in full compliance with OSHA regulations.
NEMA
The National Electrical Manufacturers Association (“NEMA”) is the association of electrical equipment and medical imaging manufacturers. NEMA provides a forum for developing technical standards in the industry and users’ best interests, advocating industry policies on legislative and regulatory matters, and collecting, analyzing, and disseminating industry data. All of our US products comply with the NEMA standards that apply to such products.
Intellectual Property
We rely on a combination of patent, trademark, copyright, unfair competition and trade secret laws, as well as confidentiality procedures and contractual restrictions, to establish, maintain and protect our proprietary rights. Our success depends partly on our ability to obtain and maintain proprietary protection for our products, technology and know-how, to operate without infringing the proprietary rights of others, and to prevent others from infringing our proprietary rights.
As of December 31, 2021, we had four active patents issued in the United States (in the name of our subsidiary Ecotality, Inc.). These patents relate to various EV charging station designs. We intend to regularly assess opportunities for seeking patent protection for those aspects of our technology, designs and methodologies that we believe provide a meaningful competitive advantage. If we cannot do so, our ability to protect our intellectual property or prevent others from infringing our proprietary rights may be impaired.
Human Capital Resources
Our experienced employees and management team are some of our most valuable resources, and we are committed to attracting, motivating, and retaining top professionals. As of December 31, 2021, we had 198 employees, including 191 full-time employees. None of our employees are represented by a union or covered by a collective bargaining agreement. We have not experienced any work stoppages, and we consider our relationship with our employees to be good.
Our success is directly related to the satisfaction, growth, and development of our employees. We strive to offer a work environment where employee opinions are valued and allow our employees to use and augment their professional skills. To achieve our human capital goals, we intend to remain focused on providing our personnel with entrepreneurial opportunities to expand our business within their areas of expertise and continue to provide our personnel with personal and professional growth. Blink emphasizes several measures and objectives in managing our human capital assets, including, among others, employee safety and wellness, talent acquisition and retention, employee engagement, development and training, diversity and inclusion, and compensation and pay equity.
COVID-19 and Employee Safety and Wellness. In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, we implemented significant changes that we determined were in the best interest of our employees as well as the communities in which we operate. These measures include allowing most employees to work from home and implementing additional safety measures for employees continuing critical on-site work. We believe in supporting our employees’ health and well-being. Our goal is to help employees make informed decisions about their health by providing the tools and resources necessary to achieve a healthier lifestyle. We offer our employees a wide array of benefits such as life and health (medical, dental, and vision) insurance, paid time off and retirement benefits, as well as emotional well-being services through our health insurance program.
Diversity and Inclusion and Ethical Business Practices. We believe that a company culture focused on diversity and inclusion is a crucial driver of creativity and innovation. We also believe that diverse and inclusive teams make better business decisions, ultimately driving better business outcomes. We are committed to recruiting, retaining, and developing high-performing, innovative and engaged employees with diverse backgrounds and experiences. This commitment includes providing equal access to, and participation in, equal employment opportunities, programs, and services without regard to race, religion, color, national origin, disability, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, stereotypes, or assumptions based thereon. We welcome and celebrate our teams’ differences, experiences, and beliefs, and we are investing in a more engaged, diverse, and inclusive workforce.
We expanded our efforts on diversification, public service, and focus on renewable energy. We established a new committee of the Board of Directors, the Environmental, Social & Governance Committee (ESG), and adopted a new diversity statement. Our Human Resources Department led several successful climate initiatives throughout the year, including a cleanup of Miami Beach.
Blink also fosters a strong corporate culture that promotes high standards of ethics and compliance for our business, including policies that set forth principles to guide employee, officer, director, and vendor conduct, such as our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics. We also maintain a whistleblower policy and anonymous hotline for the confidential reporting of any suspected policy violations or unethical business conduct on the part of our businesses, employees, officers, directors, or vendors.
Available Information
We use our website www.blinkcharging.com. Our website’s information is not, and will not be deemed, a part of this Annual Report or incorporated into any other filings we make with the SEC. Our Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act are made available on our website as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such material with, or furnish it to, the SEC. Our corporate governance documents, including our code of conduct and ethics, are also available on our website. In this Annual Report on Form 10-K, we incorporate by reference as identified herein certain information from parts of our proxy statement for our 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which we will file with the SEC and will be available, free of charge, on our website. Reports of our executive officers, directors and any other persons required to file securities ownership reports under Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act are also available on our website.

---

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS.
In addition to other information in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and in other filings we make with the Securities and Exchange Commission, the following risk factors should be carefully considered in evaluating our business as they may have a significant impact on our business, operating results and financial condition. If any of the following risks occurs, our business, financial condition, results of operations and future prospects could be materially and adversely affected. Because of the following factors, as well as other variables affecting our operating results, past financial performance should not be considered as a reliable indicator of future performance and stockholders and investors should not use historical trends to anticipate results or trends in future periods.
Relating to Our Business
We have a history of substantial net losses and expect losses to continue in the future; if we do not achieve and sustain profitability, our financial condition could suffer.
We have experienced substantial net losses, and we expect to continue to incur substantial losses for the foreseeable future. We incurred net losses of $55.1 million, $17.8 million and $9.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019, respectively. As of December 31, 2021, we had net working capital of $176.3 million and an accumulated deficit of $242.5 million. We have not yet achieved profitability.
If our revenue grows slower than we anticipate, or if our operating expenses are higher than we expect, we may not be able to achieve profitability and our financial condition could suffer. We can give no assurance that we will ever achieve profitable operations. Even if we achieve profitability in the future, we may not be able to sustain profitability in subsequent periods. Whether we can achieve cash flow levels sufficient to support our operations cannot be accurately predicted. Unless such cash flow levels are achieved, we may need to borrow additional funds or sell our debt or equity securities, or some combination of both, to provide funding for our operations. Such additional funding may not be available on commercially reasonable terms, or at all.
Our revenue growth ultimately depends on consumers’ willingness to adopt electric vehicles in a market which is still in its early stages.
Our growth is highly dependent upon the adoption by consumers of EVs, and we are subject to a risk of any reduced demand for EVs. If the market for EVs does not gain broad market acceptance or develops slower than we expect, our business, prospects, financial condition and operating results will be harmed. The market for alternative fuel vehicles is relatively new, rapidly evolving, characterized by rapidly changing technologies, price competition, additional competitors, evolving government regulation and industry standards, frequent new vehicle announcements, long development cycles for EV original equipment manufacturers, and changing consumer demands and behaviors. Factors that may influence the purchase and use of alternative fuel vehicles, specifically EVs, include:
● perceptions about EV quality, safety (in particular with respect to lithium-ion battery packs), design, performance and cost, especially if adverse events or accidents occur that are linked to the quality or safety of EVs;
● the limited range over which EVs may be driven on a single battery charge and concerns about running out of power while in use;
● improvements in the fuel economy of the internal combustion engine;
● consumers’ desire and ability to purchase a luxury automobile or one that is perceived as exclusive;
● the environmental consciousness of consumers;
● volatility in the cost of oil and gasoline;
● consumers’ perceptions of the dependency of the United States on oil from unstable or hostile countries and the impact of international conflicts;
● government regulations and economic incentives promoting fuel efficiency and alternate forms of energy;
● access to charging stations, standardization of EV charging systems and consumers’ perceptions about convenience and cost to charge an EV; and
● the availability of tax and other governmental incentives to purchase and operate EVs or future regulation requiring increased use of nonpolluting vehicles.
The influence of any of the factors described above may negatively impact the widespread consumer adoption of EVs, which would materially and adversely affect our business, operating results, financial condition and prospects.
Changes to corporate average fuel economy standards may negatively impact the EV market and demand for our products.
As regulatory initiatives have required an increase in the consumption of renewable transportation fuels, such as ethanol and biodiesel, consumer acceptance of electric and other alternative vehicles is increasing. To meet higher fuel efficiency and greenhouse gas emission standards for passenger vehicles, automobile manufacturers are increasingly using technologies, such as turbocharging, direct injection and higher compression ratios, which require high octane gasoline. If fuel efficiency of vehicles continues to rise, and affordability of vehicles using renewable transportation fuels increases, the demand for electric and high energy vehicles could diminish. If consumers no longer purchase EVs, it would materially and adversely affect our business, operating results, financial condition and prospects.
We have global operations and face risks related to health crises that could negatively impact our financial condition.
Our business, the businesses of our customers and the businesses of our charging equipment suppliers could be materially and adversely affected by the risks, or the public perception of the risks, related to a pandemic or other health crisis, such as the ongoing presence of the coronavirus COVID-19 and its variants. A significant component supplier of our Blink IQ 200 charging station is located in Taiwan and it, in turn, sources assembly parts from China, which has been particularly impacted. A significant or prolonged outbreak of contagious diseases like COVID-19 and its variants in the human population could result in a widespread health crisis that could adversely affect the economies and financial markets of many countries, resulting in an economic downturn that could affect demand for our EV supply equipment and related networked services and likely impact our operating results. Such events could result in the complete or partial closure of our Taiwan supplier’s manufacturing facility, the interruption of our distribution system, temporary or long-term disruption in our supply chains from Asia and other international suppliers, disruptions, or restrictions on our employees to work or travel, delays in the delivery of our charging stations to customers, and potential claims of exposure to diseases through contact with our charging stations. If the impact of an outbreak continues for an extended period, it could materially adversely impact our supply chain, access to capital and the growth of our revenues.
The impact of the military action in Ukraine may affect our current and future operations in the European Union.
The current invasion of Ukraine by Russia has escalated tensions among the United States, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) and Russia. The United States and other NATO member states, as well as non-member states, have announced new sanctions against Russia and certain Russian banks, enterprises and individuals. These and any future additional sanctions and any resulting conflict between Russia, the United States and NATO countries could have an adverse impact on our current operations in Belgium, Greece and the United Kingdom, which are NATO members, and could restrict our ability to expand our operations and EV charger sites into other countries in the European Union in the future. In addition, we maintain a business relationship with a supplier of certain electronic equipment located in Ukraine, which will likely be adversely impacted. We are not currently dependent on this supplier to provide our services as there are multiple sources of supply available to us. Further, such invasion, ongoing military conflict, resulting sanctions and related countermeasures by NATO states, the United States and other countries are likely to lead to market disruptions, including significant volatility in commodity prices, credit and capital markets, as well as supply chain interruptions for equipment. In light of these events, we are developing a plan designed to mitigate the impact of this conflict on our business, but it is unclear if it will successfully mitigate all disruptions, which could have an adverse impact on our operations and financial performance.
We rely on a limited number of vendors for our EV charging equipment and related support services. A loss of any of these partners would negatively affect our business.
We rely on a limited number of vendors for design, testing and manufacturing of EV charging equipment which generally singularly sourced with respect to components as well as aftermarket maintenance and warranty services. The reliance on a limited number of vendors increases our risks, since we do not currently have proven reliable alternative or replacement vendors beyond these key parties. In the event of production interruptions or supply chain disruptions including but not limited to availability of certain key components such as semiconductors, we may not be able to take advantage of increased production from other sources or develop alternate or secondary vendors without incurring material additional costs and substantial delays. Therefore, our business would be adversely affected if one or more of our vendors is impacted by any interruption at a particular location.
As the demand for public charging increases, the EV charging equipment vendors may not be able to dedicate sufficient supply chain, production, or sales channel capacity to keep up with the required pace of charging infrastructure expansion. In addition, as the EV market grows, the industry may be exposed to deteriorating design requirements, undetected faults or the erosion of testing standards by charging equipment and component suppliers, which may adversely impact the performance, reliability and lifecycle cost of the chargers. If we or our suppliers experience a significant increase in demand, or if we need to replace an existing supplier, we may not be able to supplement service or replace them on acceptable terms, which may impact our ability to install chargers in a timely manner. Thus, a loss of any significant vendor would have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and operating results.
We may be adversely affected by inflationary or market fluctuations, including impact of tariffs, in the cost of products consumed in providing our services or our cost of labor.
The prices we pay for the principal items we consume in performing our services are dependent primarily on current market prices. We have consolidated certain supply purchases with national vendors through agreements containing negotiated prospective pricing. In the event such vendors are not able to comply with their obligations under the agreements and we are required to seek alternative suppliers, we may incur increased costs of supplies.
EV chargers are impacted by commodity pricing factors, including the impact of tariffs, which in many cases are unpredictable and outside of our control. We seek to pass on to customers such increased costs but sometimes we are unable to do so. Even when we are able to pass on such costs to our customers, from time to time, sporadic unanticipated increases in the costs of certain supply items due to market or economic conditions may result in a timing delay in passing on such increases to our customers. This type of spike and unanticipated increase in EV charger costs could adversely affect our operating performance, and the adverse effect could be greater if we are delayed in passing on such additional costs to our customers (e.g., where we may not be able to pass such increase on to our customers until the time of our next scheduled service billing review). We seek to mitigate the impact of an unanticipated increase in such supplies’ costs through consolidation of vendors, which increases our ability to obtain more favorable pricing.
Our cost of labor may be influenced by factors in certain market areas. A substantial number of our employees are hourly employees whose wage rates are affected by increases in the federal or state minimum wage rates, wage inflation or local job market adjustments. We do not have a contractual right to automatically pass through all wage rate increases resulting from wage rate inflation or local job market adjustments, and we may be delayed in doing so. Our delay in, or inability to pass such wage increases through to our customers could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows.
Climate change may have a long-term impact on our business.
While we seek to partner with organizations that mitigate their business risks associated with climate change, we recognize that there are inherent risks wherever business is conducted. Access to clean water and reliable energy in the communities where we conduct our business, whether for our offices or for our vendors, is a priority. Our major sites in Miami, Florida, Los Angeles, California and Tempe, Arizona are vulnerable to climate change effects. For example, in Florida, residents are facing increasing flood risk and storm intensity. This is especially evident in Miami, due to its low-lying topography, porous limestone, dense coastal development and encroaching seas. In California, increasing intensity of drought throughout the state and annual periods of wildfire danger increase the probability of planned power outages in the communities where we work and live. While this danger has a low-assessed risk of disrupting normal business operations, it has the potential impact on employees’ abilities to commute to work or to work from home and stay connected effectively. Climate-related events, including the increasing frequency of extreme weather events and their impact on critical infrastructure throughout the United States and in other countries where we have operations, have the potential to disrupt our business, our third-party suppliers and/or the business of our customers, and may cause us to experience higher attrition, losses and additional costs to maintain or resume our EV charging operations.
Computer malware, viruses, hacking, phishing attacks and spamming that could result in security and privacy breaches and interruption in service could harm our business and our customers.
Computer malware, viruses, physical or electronic break-ins and similar disruptions could lead to interruption and delays in our services and operations and loss, misuse or theft of data. Computer malware, viruses, computer hacking and phishing attacks against online networking platforms have become more prevalent and may occur on our systems in the future. Any attempts by hackers to disrupt our website service or our internal systems, if successful, could harm our business, be expensive to remedy and damage our reputation or brand. Our network security business disruption insurance may not be sufficient to cover significant expenses and losses related to direct attacks on our website or internal systems. Efforts to prevent hackers from entering our computer systems are expensive to implement and may limit the functionality of our services. Though it is difficult to determine what, if any, harm may directly result from any specific interruption or attack, any failure to maintain performance, reliability, security and availability of our products and services and technical infrastructure may harm our reputation, brand and our ability to attract customers. Any significant disruption to our website or internal computer systems could result in a loss of customers and could adversely affect our business and results of operations.
We have previously experienced, and may in the future experience, service disruptions, outages and other performance problems due to a variety of factors, including infrastructure changes, third-party service providers, human or software errors and capacity constraints. If our mobile application is unavailable when customers attempt to access it or it does not load as quickly as they expect, customers may seek other services.
Our platform functions on software that is highly technical and complex and may now or in the future contain undetected errors, bugs, or vulnerabilities. Some errors in our software code may only be discovered after the code has been deployed. Any errors, bugs or vulnerabilities discovered in our code after deployment, inability to identify the cause or causes of performance problems within an acceptable period of time or difficultly maintaining and improving the performance of our platform, particularly during peak usage times, could result in damage to our reputation or brand, loss of revenues, or liability for damages, any of which could adversely affect our business and financial results.
We expect to continue to make significant investments to maintain and improve the availability of our platform and to enable rapid releases of new features and products. To the extent that we do not effectively address capacity constraints, upgrade our systems and equipment as needed and continually develop our technology and network architecture to accommodate actual and anticipated changes in technology, our business and operating results may be harmed. If we do not make the necessary investments or upgrades to maintain a network capable of operating on current and future generations of broadband cellular network technology, namely the 4G and 5G systems, our business and operating results could be adversely impacted.
We have a disaster recovery program to transition our operating platform and data to a failover location in the event of a catastrophe and have tested this capability under controlled circumstances. However, there are several factors ranging from human error to data corruption that could materially lengthen the time our platform is partially or fully unavailable to our user base as a result of the transition. If our platform is unavailable for a significant period of time as a result of such a transition, especially during peak periods, we could suffer damage to our reputation or brand, or loss of revenues any of which could adversely affect our business and financial results.
Growing our customer base depends upon the effective operation of our mobile applications with mobile operating systems, networks and standards that we do not control.
We are dependent on the interoperability of our mobile applications with popular mobile operating systems that we do not control, such as Google’s Android and iOS, and any changes in such systems that degrade our products’ functionality or give preferential treatment to competitive products could adversely affect the usage of our applications on mobile devices. Additionally, to deliver high quality mobile products, it is important that our products work well with a range of mobile technologies, systems, networks and standards that we do not control. We may not be successful in developing relationships with key participants in the mobile industry or in developing products that operate effectively with these technologies, systems, networks or standards.
If we are unable to keep up with advances in EV technology, we may suffer a decline in our competitive position. The EV industry is characterized by rapid technological change. If we are unable to keep up with changes in EV technology, our competitive position may deteriorate which would materially and adversely affect our business, prospects, operating results and financial condition. As technologies change, we plan to upgrade or adapt our EV charging stations and Blink Network software in order to continue to provide EV charging services with the latest technology. However, due to our limited cash resources, our efforts to do so may be limited. For example, the EV charging network that we acquired from Ecotality was originally funded in part by the U.S. Department of Energy, which funding is no longer available to us. As a result, we may be unable to grow, maintain and enhance the network of charging stations that we acquired from Ecotality at the same rate and scale as Ecotality did prior to the acquisition or at levels comparable our current competitors. Any failure of our charging stations to compete effectively with other manufacturers’ charging stations will harm our business, operating results and prospects.
We need to manage growth in operations to realize our growth potential and achieve expected revenues; our failure to manage growth could disrupt our operations and ultimately prevent us from generating the revenues we expect.
In order to take advantage of the growth that we anticipate in our current and potential markets, we believe that we must expand our marketing operations. This expansion will place a significant strain on our management and our operational, accounting, and information systems. We expect that we will need to continue to improve our financial controls, operating procedures and management information systems. We will also need to effectively train, motivate and manage our employees. Our failure to manage our growth could disrupt our operations and ultimately prevent us from generating the revenues we expect.
In order to achieve the above-mentioned targets, the general strategies of our company are to maintain and search for hard-working employees who have innovative initiatives, as well as to keep a close eye on expansion opportunities through merger and/or acquisition.
Our growth strategy depends in part on our acquiring businesses and expanding our operations, which we may not be able to do due to the risks inherent in acquisitions.
We may pursue strategic acquisitions in the future. Risks in acquisition transactions include difficulties in the integration of acquired businesses into our operations and control environment, difficulties in assimilating and retaining employees and intermediaries, difficulties in retaining the existing clients of the acquired entities, assumed or unforeseen liabilities that arise in connection with the acquired businesses, the failure of counterparties to satisfy any obligations to indemnify us against liabilities arising from the acquired businesses, and unfavorable market conditions that could negatively impact our growth expectations for the acquired businesses. Fully integrating an acquired company or business into our operations may take a significant amount of time. We cannot assure you that we will be successful in overcoming these risks or any other problems encountered with acquisitions and other strategic transactions. These risks may prevent us from realizing the expected benefits from acquisitions and could result in the failure to realize the full economic value of a strategic transaction or the impairment of goodwill and/or intangible assets recognized at the time of an acquisition. These risks could be heightened if we complete a large acquisition or multiple acquisitions within a short period of time.
We have limited insurance coverage for various liabilities and damages, including potential injuries, and such insurance coverage may not be adequate in a catastrophic situation.
We hold employer liability insurance generally covering death or work-related injury of employees. We hold product and general liability insurance covering certain incidents involving third parties that occur on or in the premises of our company. We do not maintain business interruption insurance. Our insurance coverage may be insufficient to cover any claim for product liability, damage to our fixed assets, inventory or employee injuries. Any liability or damage to, or caused by, our facilities or our personnel beyond our insurance coverage may result in our incurring substantial costs and a diversion of resources.
Our future success is largely dependent on the performance and continued service of Michael D. Farkas, our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer.
We presently depend to a significant extent upon the experience, abilities and continued services of Michael D. Farkas, our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. The loss of Mr. Farkas’ services could prove disruptive to our daily operations, require a disproportionate amount of resources and management attention and could have a material and adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our future success also depends on our ability to attract and retain highly qualified personnel.
Our future success also depends upon our ability to attract and retain highly qualified personnel. Expansion of our business and the management and operation of our company will require additional managers and employees with industry experience, and our success will be highly dependent on our ability to attract and retain skilled management personnel and other employees. There can be no assurance that we will be able to attract or retain highly qualified personnel. As our industry continues to evolve, competition for skilled personnel with the requisite experience will be significant. This competition may make it more difficult and expensive to attract, hire and retain qualified managers and employees.
We are in a highly competitive EV charging services industry and there can be no assurance that we will be able to compete with many of our competitors which are larger and have greater financial resources.
We face strong competition from competitors in the EV charging services industry, including competitors who could duplicate our model. Many of these competitors may have substantially greater financial, marketing and development resources and other capabilities than us. In addition, there are very few barriers to entry into the market for our services. There can be no assurance, therefore, that any of our current and future competitors, many of whom may have far greater resources, will not independently develop services that are substantially equivalent or superior to our services. Therefore, an investment in our company is very risky and speculative due to the competitive environment in which we may operate.
Our competitors may be able to provide customers with different or greater capabilities or benefits than we can provide in areas such as technical qualifications, past contract performance, geographic presence and driver price. Further, many of our competitors may be able to utilize substantially greater resources and economies of scale to develop competing products and technologies, divert sales away from us by winning broader contracts or hire away our employees by offering more lucrative compensation packages. In the event that the market for EV charging stations expands, we expect that competition will intensify as additional competitors enter the market and current competitors expand their product lines. In order to secure contracts successfully when competing with larger, well-financed companies, we may be forced to agree to contractual terms that provide for lower aggregate payments to us over the life of the contract, which could adversely affect our margins. Our failure to compete effectively with respect to any of these or other factors could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition or operating results.
We have experienced significant customer concentration in recent periods, and our revenue levels would likely decline if any significant customer failed to purchase product from us at anticipated levels or auto manufacturers do not extend driver incentive programs.
As of December 31, 2021, accounts receivable from a significant customer were approximately 18% of total accounts receivable. During the year ended December 31, 2021, sales to a significant customer represented 12% of total revenue. During the year ended December 31, 2020, sales to a significant customer represented 25% of total revenue. During the year ended December 31, 2020, sales to another significant customer represented 11% of total revenue. During the year ended December 31, 2019, sales to a significant customer represented 11% of product sales.
If a third party asserts that we are infringing upon its intellectual property rights, whether successful or not, it could subject us to costly and time-consuming litigation or expensive licenses, and our business may be harmed.
The EV and EV charging industries are characterized by the existence of many patents, copyrights, trademarks and trade secrets. As we face increasing competition, the possibility of intellectual property rights claims against us grows. Our technologies may not be able to withstand any third-party claims or rights against their use. Additionally, although we have acquired from other companies’ proprietary technology covered by patents, we cannot be certain that any such patents will not be challenged, invalidated or circumvented. Intellectual property infringement claims against us could harm our relationships with our customers, may deter future customers from subscribing to our services or could expose us to litigation with respect to these claims. Even if we are not a party to any litigation involving a customer and third party, an adverse outcome in any such litigation could make it more difficult for us to defend our intellectual property in any subsequent litigation in which we are a named party. Any of these results could harm our brand and operating results.
Any intellectual property rights claim against us or our customers, with or without merit, could be time-consuming, expensive to litigate or settle and could divert management resources and attention. An adverse determination also could prevent us from offering our services to our customers and may require that we procure or develop substitute services that do not infringe.
With respect to any intellectual property rights claim against us or our customers, we may have to pay damages or stop using technology found to be in violation of a third party’s rights. We may have to seek a license for the technology, which may not be available on reasonable terms, may significantly increase our operating expenses or require us to restrict our business activities in one or more respects. The technology also may not be available for license to us at all. As a result, we may also be required to develop alternative non-infringing technology, which could require significant effort and expense.
The success of our business depends in large part on our ability to protect our proprietary information and technology and enforce our intellectual property rights against third parties.
We rely on a combination of patent, copyright, service mark, trademark and trade secret laws, as well as confidentiality procedures and contractual restrictions, to establish and protect our proprietary rights, all of which provide only limited protection. We cannot assure you that any patents will issue with respect to our currently pending patent applications, in a manner that gives us the protection that we seek, if at all, or that any future patents issued to us will not be challenged, invalidated or circumvented. Our currently issued patents and any patents that may issue in the future with respect to pending or future patent applications may not provide sufficiently broad protection or they may not prove to be enforceable in actions against alleged infringers. Also, we cannot assure you that any future service mark registrations will be issued with respect to pending or future applications or that any registered service marks will be enforceable or provide adequate protection of our proprietary rights.
We endeavor to enter into agreements with our employees and contractors and agreements with parties with whom we do business to limit access to and disclosure of our proprietary information. We cannot be certain that the steps we have taken will prevent unauthorized use of our technology or the reverse engineering of our technology. Moreover, others may independently develop technologies that are competitive to ours or infringe our intellectual property. The enforcement of our intellectual property rights also depends on our legal actions against these infringers being successful, but we cannot be sure these actions will be successful, even when our rights have been infringed.
Further, effective patent, trademark, service mark, copyright and trade secret protection may not be available in every country in which our services are available over the Internet. In addition, the legal standards relating to the validity, enforceability and scope of protection of intellectual property rights in EV-related industries are uncertain and still evolving.
Changes to existing federal, state or international laws or regulations applicable to us could cause an erosion of our current competitive strengths.
Our business is subject to a variety of federal, state and international laws and regulations, including those with respect government incentives promoting fuel efficiency and alternate forms of energy, electric vehicles and others. These laws and regulations, and the interpretation or application of these laws and regulations, could change. Any reduction, elimination or discriminatory application of government subsidies and economic incentives because of policy changes, fiscal tightening or other reasons may result in diminished revenues from government sources and diminished demand for our products. In addition, new laws or regulations affecting our business could be enacted. These laws and regulations are frequently costly to comply with and may divert a significant portion of management’s attention. If we fail to comply with these applicable laws or regulations, we could be subject to significant liabilities which could adversely affect our business.
There are many federal, state and international laws that may affect our business, including measures to regulate EVs and charging systems. If we fail to comply with these applicable laws or regulations, we could be subject to significant liabilities which could adversely affect our business.
There are a number of significant matters under review and discussion with respect to government regulations which may affect business and/or harm our customers, and thereby adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our failure to maintain effective internal control over financial reporting could have a material adverse effect on our ability to report our financial results on a timely and accurate basis.
We identified certain design deficiencies in our management and analytical review controls associated with the financial close, revenue and inventory processes. These deficiencies, individually or in the aggregate, combined with inadequate compensating controls, created a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement to the consolidated financial statements might not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. We expect to remediate these control deficiencies during 2022.
Our failure to maintain appropriate and effective internal controls over our financial reporting could result in misstatements in our financial statements and potentially subject us to sanctions or investigations by the SEC or other regulatory authorities and could cause us to delay the filing of required reports with the SEC and our reporting of financial results. Any of these events could result in a decline in the market price of our common stock. Although we have taken steps to maintain our internal control structure as required, we cannot guarantee that a control deficiency will not result in a misstatement in the future.
See Item 9A - Controls and Procedures - Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting for further information on material weaknesses.
If our estimates or judgments relating to our critical accounting policies prove to be incorrect, our financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, as discussed under “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” included elsewhere in this Annual Report and in our consolidated financial statements included herein. The results of these estimates form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets, liabilities and equity, and the amount of revenue and expenses that are not readily apparent from other sources. Significant assumptions and estimates used in preparing our consolidated financial statements include those related to revenue recognition, allowance for doubtful accounts, inventory reserves, impairment of goodwill, indefinite-lived and long-lived assets, pension and other post-retirement benefits, product warranty, valuation allowances for deferred tax assets, valuation of common stock warrants, and share-based compensation. Our financial condition and results of operations may be adversely affected if our assumptions change or if actual circumstances differ from those in our assumptions, which could cause our results of operations to fall below the expectations of securities analysts and investors, resulting in a decline in the price of our common stock.
Risks Associated with Our Securities
Our common stock price has fluctuated in recent years and is likely to fluctuate significantly from its current level.
The market price of shares of our common stock has fluctuated substantially in recent years and is likely to fluctuate significantly from its current level. During the 52-week period prior to the filing of this Annual Report, for example, the market closing price of our shares has ranged from a low of $17.93 per share to a high of $49.00 per share. Future announcements concerning the introduction of new products, services or technologies or changes in product pricing policies by us or our competitors or changes in earnings estimates by analysts, among other factors, could cause the market price of our common stock to fluctuate substantially. Also, stock markets have experienced extreme price and volume volatility in the last year. This volatility has had a substantial effect on the market prices of securities of many public companies for reasons frequently unrelated to the operating performance of the specific companies. These broad market fluctuations may also cause declines in the market price of our common stock. Investors seeking short-term liquidity should be aware that we cannot assure that the stock price will continue at these or any higher levels.
A possible “short squeeze” due to a sudden increase in demand of our common stock that largely exceeds supply may lead to further price volatility in our common stock.
Investors may purchase shares of our common stock to hedge existing exposure in our common stock or to speculate on the price of our common stock. Speculation on the price of our common stock may involve long and short exposures. To the extent aggregate short exposure exceeds the number of shares of our common stock available for purchase in the open market, investors with short exposure may have to pay a premium to repurchase our common stock for delivery to lenders of our common stock. Those repurchases may in turn, dramatically increase the price of our common stock until investors with short exposure are able to purchase additional shares of common stock to cover their short position. This is often referred to as a “short squeeze.” A short squeeze could lead to volatile price movements in shares of our common stock that are not directly correlated to the performance or prospects of our company and once investors purchase the shares necessary to cover their short position the price of our common stock may decline. We believe that the recent volatility in our common stock may be due, in part, to short squeezes that may be temporarily increasing the price of our common stock, which could result in a loss of some or all of your investment in our common stock.
We have a significant number of shares of common stock issuable upon exercise or conversion of outstanding warrants, convertible preferred stock and stock options, and the issuance of such shares could have a significant dilutive impact on our stockholders.
As of March 10, 2022, we had outstanding warrants to purchase 3,264,641 shares of common stock, and outstanding stock options to purchase 977,473 shares of common stock. In addition, our Articles of Incorporation permit us to issue up to approximately 400 million additional shares of common stock. Thus, we have the ability to issue a substantial number of additional shares of common stock in the future, which would dilute the percentage ownership held by existing stockholders.
Sales of a substantial number of shares of our common stock in the public market could cause the market price of our common stock to decline. If there are more shares of common stock offered for sale than buyers are willing to purchase, then the market price of our common stock may decline to a market price at which buyers are willing to purchase the offered shares of common stock and sellers remain willing to sell the shares.
Our executive officers and directors, including our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and his affiliates, possess significant voting power with respect to our common stock, which will limit your influence on corporate matters.
As of March 10, 2022, our directors and executive officers collectively beneficially owned approximately 16% of our outstanding shares of common stock, including the beneficial ownership of Michael D. Farkas and his affiliates of approximately 15% of our outstanding shares of common stock.
As a result, our insiders have the ability to significantly influence our management and affairs through the election and removal of our Board and all other matters requiring stockholder approval, including any future merger, consolidation or sale of all or substantially all of our assets. This concentrated voting power could discourage others from initiating any potential merger, takeover or other change-of-control transaction that may otherwise be beneficial to our stockholders. Further, this concentrated control will limit the practical effect of your influence over our business and affairs, through any stockholder vote or otherwise. Any of these effects could depress the price of our common stock.
Our Articles of Incorporation grant our board the power to issue additional shares of common and preferred stock and to designate additional series of preferred stock, all without stockholder approval.
We are authorized to issue 540,000,000 shares of capital stock, of which, 40,000,000 shares are authorized as preferred stock. Our Board, without any action by our stockholders, may designate and issue shares of preferred stock in such series as it deems appropriate and establish the rights, preferences and privileges of such shares, including dividends, liquidation and voting rights, provided it is consistent with Nevada law.
The rights of holders of our preferred stock that may be issued could be superior to the rights of holders of our shares of common stock. The designation and issuance of shares of capital stock having preferential rights could adversely affect other rights appurtenant to shares of our common stock. Further, any issuances of additional stock (common or preferred) will dilute the percentage of ownership interest of then-current holders of our capital stock and may dilute our book value per share.
Certain provisions of our corporate governing documents and Nevada law could discourage, delay or prevent a merger or acquisition at a premium price.
Certain provisions of our organizational documents and Nevada law could discourage potential acquisition proposals, delay or prevent a change in control of our company, or limit the price that investors may be willing to pay in the future for shares of our common stock. For example, our Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws permit us to issue, without any further vote or action by stockholders, up to 40,000,000 shares of preferred stock in one or more series and, with respect to each series, to fix the number of shares constituting the series and the designation of the series, the voting powers (if any) of the shares of the series, and the preferences and relative, participating, optional, and other special rights, if any, and any qualifications, limitations or restrictions of the shares of the series.
If securities or industry analysts do not publish research or reports about our business or publish inaccurate or unfavorable research reports about our business, our share price and trading volume could decline.
The trading market for our common stock will, to some extent, depend on the research and reports that securities or industry analysts publish about us or our business. We do not have any control over these analysts. If one or more of the analysts who cover us from time to time should downgrade our shares or change their opinion of our business prospects, our share price would likely decline. If one or more of these analysts ceases coverage of our company or fails to regularly publish reports on us, we could lose visibility in the financial markets, which could cause our share price or trading volume to decline.
We do not intend to pay cash dividends on our common stock for the foreseeable future, and you must rely on increases in the market price of our common stock for returns on your investment.
For the foreseeable future, we intend to retain any earnings to finance the development and expansion of our business, and we do not anticipate paying any cash dividends on our common stock. Accordingly, stockholders and investors must be prepared to rely on sales of their common stock after price appreciation to earn an investment return, which may never occur. Stockholders and investors seeking cash dividends should not purchase our common stock. Any determination to pay dividends in the future will be made at the discretion of our Board and will depend on our results of operations, financial condition, contractual restrictions, restrictions imposed by applicable law and other factors the Board deems relevant.
Our business could be negatively affected as a result of actions of activist shareholders, and such activism could impact the trading value of our securities.
Shareholders may, from time to time, engage in proxy solicitations or advance shareholder proposals, or otherwise attempt to effect changes and assert influence on our Board of Directors and management. Activist campaigns that contest or conflict with our strategic direction or seek changes in the composition of our Board of Directors could have an adverse effect on our operating results and financial condition. A proxy contest would require us to incur significant legal and advisory fees, proxy solicitation expenses and administrative and associated costs and require significant time and attention by our Board of Directors and management, diverting their attention from the pursuit of our business strategy. Any perceived uncertainties as to our future direction and control, our ability to execute on our strategy, or changes to the composition of our Board of Directors or senior management team arising from a proxy contest could lead to the perception of a change in the direction of our business or instability which may result in the loss of potential business opportunities, make it more difficult to pursue our strategic initiatives, or limit our ability to attract and retain qualified personnel and business partners, any of which could adversely affect our business and operating results. If individuals are ultimately elected to our Board of Directors with a specific agenda, it may adversely affect our ability to effectively implement our business strategy and create additional value for our shareholders. We may choose to initiate, or may become subject to, litigation as a result of a proxy contest or matters arising from a proxy contest, which would serve as a further distraction to our Board of Directors and management and would require us to incur significant additional costs. In addition, actions such as those described above could cause significant fluctuations in our stock price based upon temporary or speculative market perceptions or other factors that do not necessarily reflect the underlying fundamentals and prospects of our business.

---

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS.
Not applicable.

---

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES.
We maintain our principal offices at 605 Lincoln Road, 5th Floor, Miami Beach, Florida 33139.
On January 22, 2021, we closed on the purchase of approximately 10,000 square feet of office condominium space which is our principal office. This new office space is our corporate headquarters.
In addition, we lease office space in Tempe, Arizona; Los Angeles, California; Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Antwerp, Belgium; and Israel from which we operate our current business.

---

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.
We have been party to certain legal proceedings that have arisen in the ordinary course of our business and have been incidental to our business. Certain of the claims that have been made against us allege, among other things, breach of contract or breach of express and implied warranties with regard to our products. Although litigation is inherently uncertain, and we believe we are insured against many such instances, based on past experience and the information currently available, management does not believe that any currently pending and threatened litigation or claims will have a material adverse effect on our financial position, liquidity or results of operations. However, future events or circumstances, currently unknown to management, will determine whether the resolution of pending or threatened litigation or claims will ultimately have a material effect on our financial position, liquidity or results of operations in any future reporting periods.
On August 24, 2020, a purported securities class action lawsuit, captioned Bush v. Blink Charging Co. et al., Case No. 20-cv-23527, was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida against the Company, Michael Farkas (Blink’s Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer), and Michael Rama (Blink’s Chief Financial Officer) (the “Bush Lawsuit”). On September 1, 2020, another purported securities class action lawsuit, captioned Vittoria v. Blink Charging Co. et al., Case No. 20-cv-23643, was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida against the same defendants and seeking to recover the same alleged damages (the “Vittoria Lawsuit”). On October 1, 2020, the court consolidated the Vittoria Lawsuit with the Bush Lawsuit and on December 21, 2020 the court appointed Tianyou Wu, Alexander Yu and H. Marc Joseph to serve as the Co-Lead Plaintiffs. The Co-Lead Plaintiffs filed an Amended Complaint on February 19, 2021. The Amended Complaint alleges, among other things, that the defendants made false or misleading statements about the size and functionality of the Blink Network, and asserts claims under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The Amended Complaint does not quantify damages but seeks to recover damages on behalf of investors who purchased or otherwise acquired Blink’s common stock between March 6, 2020 and August 19, 2020. On April 20, 2021, Blink and the other defendants filed a motion to dismiss the Amended Complaint, which has now been fully briefed and is ready for review. The Company believes that the claim has no merit, and wholly and completely disputes the allegations therein. The Company has retained legal counsel in order to defend the action vigorously. The Company has not recorded an accrual related to this matter as of December 31, 2021 as was determined that any such loss contingency was either not probable or estimable.
On September 15, 2020, a shareholder derivative lawsuit, captioned Klein (derivatively on behalf of Blink Charging Co.) v. Farkas et al., Case No. 20- 19815CA01, was filed in Miami-Dade County Circuit Court seeking to pursue claims belonging to the Company against Blink’s Board of Directors and Michael Rama (the “Klein Lawsuit”). Blink is named as a nominal defendant. The Klein Lawsuit asserts that the Director defendants caused Blink to make the statements that are at issue in the securities class action and, as a result, the Company will incur costs defending against the consolidated Bush Lawsuit and other unidentified investigations. The Klein Lawsuit asserts claims against the Director defendants for breach of fiduciary duties and corporate waste and against all of the defendants for unjust enrichment. Klein did not quantify the alleged damages in his complaint, but he seeks damages sustained by the Company as a result of the defendants’ breaches of fiduciary duties, corporate governance changes, restitution, and disgorgement of profits from the defendants and attorneys’ fees and other litigation expenses. The parties agreed to temporarily stay the Klein Lawsuit until there is a ruling on the motion to dismiss filed in the consolidated Bush Lawsuit. The Company has not recorded an accrual related to this matter as of December 31, 2021 as was determined that any such loss contingency was either not probable or estimable.
On December 22, 2020, JMJ Financial v. Blink Charging Co. was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, seeking to pursue claims for alleged breach of contract and conversion (the “JMJ Lawsuit”). The complaint alleges that JMJ Financial purchased warrants to acquire 147,057 shares of Blink common stock on or about April 9, 2018, which permitted a cashless exercise, and that on November 23, 2020, JMJ Financial delivered a notice of warrant exercise to Blink and that the Company failed to deliver the shares. The claim alleges breach of contract and conversion; the plaintiff requests damages of at least $4,200,000, attorneys’ fees, and specific enforcement requiring delivery of the shares. In January 2021, the Company entered into a settlement agreement with JMJ under which the parties exchanged releases and the litigation was discontinued with prejudice. The Company did not make a cash payment in the settlement, but rather delivered 66,000 shares of stock, representing a modification of the initial warrant exercise but did not result in the recognition of any incremental expense.
On December 23, 2020, another shareholder derivative action, captioned Bhatia (derivatively on behalf of Blink Charging Co.) v. Farkas et al., Case No. 20-27632CA01, was filed in Miami-Dade County Circuit Court against the same defendants sued in the Klein Lawsuit and asserting similar claims, as well as additional claims relating to the Company’s nomination, appointment and hiring of minorities and women and the Company’s decision to retain its outside auditor (the “Bhatia Lawsuit”). On February 17, 2021, the parties agreed to consolidate the Klein and Bhatia actions, which the court consolidated under the caption In re Blink Charging Company Stockholder Derivative Litigation, Lead Case No. 2020-019815-CA-01. The parties also agreed to keep in place the temporary stay. The court subsequently vacated the consolidation order and explained the parties should first file a motion to transfer, which the parties have done. The Company believes that the claim has no merit, and wholly and completely disputes the allegations therein. The Company has retained legal counsel in order to defend the action vigorously. The Company has not recorded an accrual related to this matter as of December 31, 2021 as was determined that any such loss contingency was either not probable or estimable.
On February 12, 2021, another shareholder derivative lawsuit, captioned Wolery (derivatively on behalf of Blink Charging Co.) v. Buffalino et al., Case No. A-21-829395-C, was filed in the Eighth Judicial District Court in Clark County, Nevada seeking to pursue claims belonging to the Company against Blink’s Board of Directors (the “Wolery Lawsuit”). Blink is named as a nominal defendant. The Wolery complaint alleges that the amount of restricted stock awarded to Blink’s outside directors in December 2020 exceeded the amounts permitted by Blink’s incentive compensation plan. The complaint asks the court to rescind the excess restricted stock awards, as well as other relief. On September 15, 2021, the parties entered into a term sheet in which they agreed to settle the claims subject to the court’s approval. On January 25, 2022 the court preliminarily approved the settlement and subsequently scheduled a final hearing for April 12, 2022. If the court gives final approval to the settlement, the Company has agreed to make certain changes to its compensation practices for its directors and officers, including, among other things, eliminating the practice of making cash payments to directors to cover expected income taxes on stock grants and placing a $200,000 annual limit for two years on the combined stock and cash Awards to outside directors. The defendants do not admit any liability or wrongdoing in the settlement and will not make any cash payment as part of the settlement, but the Company will be responsible for paying the costs to give notice of the settlement to the Company’s shareholders and to pay $190,000 in attorney’s fees to the plaintiff’s counsel which was accrued for as of December 31, 2021.
On February 7, 2022, another shareholder derivative lawsuit, captioned McCauley (derivatively on behalf of Blink Charging Co.) v. Farkas et al., Case No. A-22-847894-C, was filed in the Eighth Judicial District Court in Clark County, Nevada, seeking to pursue claims belonging to the Company against six of Blink’s directors and Michael Rama (the “McCauley Lawsuit”). Blink is named as a nominal defendant. The complaint filed in the McCauley Lawsuit asserts similar allegations to the Klein Lawsuit relating to the statements at issue in the securities class action and asserts claims for breach of fiduciary duty and unjust enrichment. The McCauley Lawsuit seeks both injunctive and monetary relief from the individual defendants, as well as an award of attorneys’ fees and costs. The Company has not recorded an accrual related to this matter as of December 31, 2021 as was determined that any such loss contingency was either not probable or estimable.
On November 12, 2021, our Board of Directors approved a Confidential Settlement and Release Agreement with Aviv Hillo, our General Counsel. In consideration for Mr. Hillo releasing any and all claims of harassment involving a former executive, we issued Mr. Hillo 60,000 shares of our common stock in full settlement of the matter.

---

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURE
ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES.
Not applicable.
PART II

---

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES.
Market Information
Our shares of common stock and warrants to purchase common stock are traded on the Nasdaq Capital Market under the symbols “BLNK” and “BLNKW,” respectively.
Security Holders
As of March 10, 2022, we had approximately 293 stockholders of record of our common stock and approximately 547 beneficial owners of our common stock.
The closing price of our common stock on March 10, 2022 was $25.13 per share, as reported by The Nasdaq Capital Market.
Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities
None.
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
None.
Dividend Policy
To date, we have not paid any dividends on our common stock and do not anticipate paying any such dividends in the foreseeable future. The declaration and payment of dividends on the common stock is at the discretion of our Board and will depend on, among other things, our operating results, financial condition, contractual restrictions, restrictions imposed by applicable law and other factors the Board may deem relevant. We currently expect to use all available funds to finance the future development and expansion of our business and do not anticipate paying dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future.

---

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
ITEM 6. [RESERVED]

---

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.
The following discussion and analysis of the results of operations and financial condition for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and the notes to those consolidated financial statements that are included elsewhere in this Annual Report. This section generally discusses the results of our operations for the year ended December 31, 2021 compared to the year ended December 31, 2020. For a discussion of the year ended December 31, 2020 compared to the year ended December 31, 2019, please refer to Part II, Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020, which was filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 31, 2021. Our discussion includes forward-looking statements based upon current expectations that involve risks and uncertainties, such as our plans, objectives, expectations and intentions. Actual results and the timing of events could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of a number of factors. See “Forward-Looking Statements.”
At Blink Charging, our highest priority remains the safety, health and well-being of our employees, their families and our communities and we remain committed to serving the needs of our customers and business partners. The Covid-19 pandemic is a highly fluid situation and it is not currently possible for us to reasonably estimate the impact it may have on our financial and operating results. We will continue to evaluate the impact of the ongoing presence of Covid-19 and multiple Covid-19 variants on our business as we learn more and the impact of Covid-19 on our industry becomes clearer.
Any one or more of these uncertainties, risks and other influences, could materially affect our results of operations and whether forward-looking statements made by us ultimately prove to be accurate. Our actual results, performance and achievements could differ materially from those expressed or implied in these forward-looking statements. Except as required by federal securities laws, we undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether from new information, future events or otherwise.
Dollars are reported in thousands.
Overview
We are a leading owner, operator, and provider of electric vehicle (“EV”) charging equipment and networked EV charging services in the rapidly growing U.S. and international markets for Evs. Blink offers residential and commercial EV charging equipment and services, enabling EV drivers to recharge at various location types. Blink’s principal line of products and services is its nationwide Blink EV charging network (the “Blink Network”) and Blink EV charging equipment, also known as electric vehicle supply equipment (“EVSE”) and other EV-related services. The Blink Network is a proprietary, cloud-based system that operates, maintains, and manages Blink charging stations and handles the associated charging data, back-end operations, and payment processing. The Blink Network provides property owners, managers, parking companies, and state and municipal entities (“Property Partners”), among other types of commercial customers, with cloud-based services that enable the remote monitoring and management of EV charging stations. The Blink Network also provides EV drivers with vital station information, including station location, availability, and fees (if applicable).
In order to capture more revenues derived from providing EV charging equipment to commercial customers and to help differentiate Blink in the EV infrastructure market, Blink offers Property Partners a comprehensive range of solutions for EV charging equipment and services that generally fall into one of the business models below, differentiated by who bears the costs of installation, equipment, maintenance, and the percentage of revenue shared.
● In our Blink-owned turnkey business model, Blink incurs the costs of the charging equipment and installation. We own and operate the EV charging station and provide connectivity of the charging station to the Blink Network. In this model, which favors recurring revenues, Blink incurs most costs associated with the EV charging stations; thus, Blink retains substantially all EV charging revenues after deducting network connectivity and processing fees.
● In our Blink-owned hybrid business model, Blink incurs the costs of the charging equipment while the Property Partner incurs the costs of installation. We own and operate the EV charging station and provide connectivity of the charging station to the Blink Network. In this model, the Property Partner incurs the installation costs associated with the EV station; thus, Blink shares a more generous portion of the EV charging revenues with the Property Partner generated from the EV charging station after deducting network connectivity and processing fees.
● In our host-owned business model, the Property Partner purchases, owns and operates the Blink EV charging station and incurs the installation costs. Blink works with the Property Partner, providing site recommendations, connectivity to the Blink Network, payment processing, and optional maintenance services. In this model, the Property Partner retains and keeps all the EV charging revenues after deducting network connectivity and processing fees.
● In our Blink-as-a-Service model, Blink owns and operates the EV charging station, while the Property Partner incurs the installation costs. The Property Partner pays to Blink a fixed monthly fee and keeps all the EV charging revenues after deducting network connectivity and processing fees.
Blink also operates a ride-sharing program through the Company’s wholly owned subsidiary, BlueLA Rideshare, LLC and the City of Los Angeles which allows customers the ability to rent electric vehicles through a subscription service.
As part of Blink’s mission to facilitate the adoption of EVs through the deployment and operation of EV charging infrastructure globally, we are dedicated to slowing climate change by reducing greenhouse gas emissions caused by road vehicles. With the goal of leading the build out of EV charging infrastructure and of maximizing Blink’s share of the EV charging market, we have established strategic commercial, municipal and retail partnerships across industry verticals and encompassing numerous transit/destination locations, including airports, auto dealers, healthcare/medical, hotels, mixed-use, municipal sites, multifamily residential and condos, parks and recreation areas, parking lots, religious institutions, restaurants, retailers, schools and universities, stadiums, supermarkets, transportation hubs, and workplace locations.
As of December 31, 2021, since our inception and excluding Blue Corner, we sold, deployed or acquired through acquisitions 20,684 chargers, of which, 7,366 were connected to the Blink Network (4,611 Level 2 publicly accessible commercial chargers, 1,536 Level 2 private commercial chargers, 91 DC Fast Charging EV publicly accessible chargers, 34 DC Fast Charging EV private chargers, and 1,095 residential Level 2 Blink EV chargers), 920 Level 2 chargers and 45 DC Fast Chargers are pending to be commissioned to the Blink Network, and the remaining 12,353 were non-networked, on other networks or international sales or deployments (159 Level 2 commercial chargers, 6 DC Fast Charging chargers, 10,099 residential Level 2 Blink EV chargers, 1,034 sold to other US networks, 990 sold internationally and 64 deployed internationally). The charger units herein are net of swap-out or replacement units.
In addition, as of February 3, 2022, since its inception, our recently acquired subsidiary, Blue Corner, sold or deployed 11,677 independent charge points, all of which were on Blue Corner’s network, which was comprised of 4,566 Level 2 publicly accessible commercial independent charge points, 19 DC Fast Charging publicly assessable commercial independent charge points and 7,092 private L2, private DC Fast Charging and private residential independent charge points. The charger units reported herein are net of swap-out or replacement units.
As reflected in our consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2021, we had a cash balance of $174,795, working capital of $176,303 and an accumulated deficit of $242,470.
During the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019, we incurred net losses of $55,119, $17,846 and $9,649, respectively. We have not yet achieved profitability.
Recent Developments
New Product and Service Offerings
In January 2022, we announced the next generation of Level 2 chargers to enhance our offering for the residential and the Fleet multifamily residential markets. The HQ 200 Basic is a non-networked residential product and the HQ 200 Smart is a networked residential product. The MQ 200 product is an ideal product for the Fleet and multifamily residential markets. Furthermore, in January 2022, Blink announced the Fleet Management Portal targeted at commercial, municipal and federal fleets that are interested in electrifying their fleets for planning, managing, optimizing their fleets for departure and energy costs.
May 2021 Acquisition of Blue Corner
On May 10, 2021, pursuant to a Share Purchase Agreement dated April 21, 2021, the Company, through its wholly owned subsidiary in the Netherlands, Blink Holdings, B.V. closed on the acquisition from the shareholders of Blue Corner NV, a Belgian company (“Blue Corner”), of all of the outstanding capital stock of Blue Corner. Headquartered in Belgium, with sales representative offices in several other European cities, Blue Corner owns and operates an EV charging network across Europe. The acquisition of Blue Corner was made to enter the European market and provide an opportunity to expand the Company’s footprint in this region. The purchase price for the acquisition of all of Blue Corner’s outstanding capital stock was approximately $23,775 (or €20,000), consisting of approximately $22,985 (or €19,000) in cash and approximately $790 (€700) represented by 32,382 shares of the Company’s common stock (the “Consideration Shares”). The fair value of the Consideration Shares was calculated based on the average price of the Company’s common stock during the 30 consecutive trading days immediately preceding the closing date of the Share Purchase Agreement, which equaled $37.66 (or €30.88) per share, reduced by a discount for illiquidity due to the 12 month lockup that exists on any sales or transfers. The Company executed management agreements with key Blue Corner personnel, including equity incentive packages consisting of additional shares of the Company’s common stock which is compensatory and not included in the purchase price for this acquisition. The Company entered into an escrow agreement pursuant to the Share Purchase Agreement, under which the Company paid approximately $2,100 (€1,725) of the purchase price into an escrow account for a period of up to 18 months following the closing to cover any losses or damages the Company may incur by reason of any misrepresentation or breach of warranty by Blue Corner under the Share Purchase Agreement.
January 2021 Underwritten Public Offering
In January 2021, we completed an underwritten registered public offering of 5,660,000 shares of our common stock at a public offering price of $41.00 per share. We received approximately $232,100 in gross proceeds from the public offering, and approximately $221,400 in net proceeds after deducting the underwriting discount and offering expenses paid by us. Our Chief Executive Officer and one other officer participated in the offering by selling a total of 550,000 shares of our common stock from the exercise of the underwriter’s option to purchase additional shares. The public offering was made pursuant to our automatic shelf registration statement on Form S-3 filed with the SEC on January 6, 2021 and prospectus supplement dated January 7, 2021. Barclays Capital Inc. served as the lead book-running manager of the offering.
Government Grants
Blink has established a full-time dedicated team to identify and process federal and state funding opportunities for EV charging infrastructure development. Blink is committed to pursuing EV charging development grant opportunities in all 50 states. Sources of funding include funding from the United States Department of Energy, the United States Department of Transportation, the VW mitigation settlement trust fund, and funding initiatives from utility service providers. During the year ended December 31, 2021, we were awarded approximately $26,000 in grants from federal and state agencies. Such awards are expected to be recognized as revenue in future periods based on the grant contract or service life of the chargers.
Note on Covid-19
The Covid-19 pandemic has impacted global stock markets and economies. We closely monitor the impact of the continuing presence of Covid-19 and recently identified variants of Covid-19 which appear to be more transmissible and contagious than previous Covid-19 variants and have caused an increase in the number of Covid-19 cases globally. We have taken and continue to take precautions to ensure the safety of our employees, customers and business partners, while assuring business continuity and reliable service and support to our customers. We continue to receive orders for our products, although some shipments of equipment have been temporarily delayed. The global chip shortage and supply chain disruption has caused some delays in equipment orders from our contract manufacturer. As federal, state and local economies begin to return to pre-pandemic levels, we expect demand for charging station usage to increase, however, we are unable to predict the extent of such recovery due to the uncertainty of Covid-19. As a result, we are unable to predict the ultimate impact of equipment order delays, chip shortage and continuous presence of Covid-19 will have on our business, future results of operations, financial position, or cash flows. We intend to continue to monitor the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on our business closely. For a further discussion of the risks, uncertainties and actions taken in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, refer to Item 1A “Risk Factors”.
Key Factors Affecting Operating Results
We believe our performance and future success depend on several factors, including those discussed below:
Competition - The EV charging equipment and service market is highly competitive, and we expect the market to become increasingly competitive as new entrants enter this growing market. Our products and services compete on product performance and features, the total cost of ownership, sales capabilities, financial stability, brand recognition, product reliability, and the installed base’s size. Existing competitors may expand their product offerings and sales strategies, and new competitors may enter the market. If our market share decreases due to increased competition, its revenue and ability to generate profits in the future may be impacted.
Growth - Our growth is highly dependent upon the adoption by consumers of EVs, and we are subject to a risk of any reduced demand for EVs. The market for alternative fuel vehicles is relatively new, rapidly evolving, characterized by rapidly changing technologies, price competition, additional competitors, evolving government regulation and industry standards, frequent new vehicle announcements, long development cycles for EV original equipment manufacturers, and changing consumer demands and behaviors. Factors that may influence the purchase and use of alternative fuel vehicles, and specifically EVs, include perceptions about EV quality, safety (in particular with respect to lithium-ion battery packs), design, performance and cost; the limited range over which EVs may be driven on a single battery charge and concerns about running out of power while in use; improvements in the fuel economy of the internal combustion engine; consumers’ desire and ability to purchase a luxury automobile or one that is perceived as exclusive; the environmental consciousness of consumers; volatility in the cost of oil and gasoline; consumers’ perceptions of the dependency of the United States on oil from unstable or hostile countries and the impact of international conflicts; government regulations and economic incentives promoting fuel efficiency and alternate forms of energy; access to charging stations, standardization of EV charging systems and consumers’ perceptions about convenience and cost to charge an EV; and the availability of tax and other governmental incentives to purchase and operate EVs or future regulation requiring increased use of nonpolluting vehicles. If the market for EVs does not gain broad market acceptance or develops slower than we expect, our business, prospects, financial condition and operating results may be adversely affected.
Regulations - Our business is subject to a variety of federal, state and international laws and regulations, including those with respect government incentives promoting fuel efficiency and alternate forms of energy, electric vehicles and others. These laws and regulations, and the interpretation or application of these laws and regulations, could change. Any reduction, elimination or discriminatory application of government subsidies and economic incentives because of policy changes, fiscal tightening or other reasons may result in diminished revenues from government sources and diminished demand for our products. In addition, new laws or regulations affecting our business could be enacted. These laws and regulations are frequently costly to comply with and may divert a significant portion of management’s attention. Changes to these applicable laws or regulations could affect business and/or harm our customers, thereby adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Expansion through Acquisitions - We may pursue strategic domestic and international acquisitions to expand our operations. Risks in acquisition transactions include difficulties in the integration of acquired businesses into our operations and control environment, difficulties in assimilating and retaining employees and intermediaries, difficulties in retaining the existing clients of the acquired entities, assumed or unforeseen liabilities that arise in connection with the acquired businesses, the failure of counterparties to satisfy any obligations to indemnify us against liabilities arising from the acquired businesses, and unfavorable market conditions that could negatively impact our growth expectations for the acquired businesses. Fully integrating an acquired company or business into our operations may take a significant amount of time. If we are unable to integrate or pursue strategic acquisitions, our financial condition and results of operations would be negatively impacted.
Results of Operations
Year Ended December 31, 2021 Compared Year Ended December 31, 2020
For The Years Ended
December 31,
Difference $ Difference%
Revenues:
Product sales $ 15,480 $ 4,432 $ 11,048 249 %
Charging service revenue - company- owned charging stations
2,978 2,205 285 %
Network fees 93 %
Warranty 71 %
Grant and rebate 1718 %
Ride-sharing services 358 %
Other 18 %
Total Revenues 20,940 6,231 14,709 236 %
Cost of Revenues:
Cost of product sales 11,670 2,860 8,810 308 %
Cost of charging services - company-owned charging stations 313 %
Host provider fees 1,386 1,121 423 %
Network costs (62 ) -12 %
Warranty and repairs and maintenance 169 %
Ride-sharing services 1,458 1,232 545 %
Depreciation and amortization 1,531 1,186 344 %
Total Cost of Revenues 18,098 4,714 13,384 284 %
Gross Profit 2,842 1,517 1,325 87 %
Operating Expenses:
Compensation 38,389 12,718 25,671 202 %
General and administrative expenses 10,516 4,047 6,469 160 %
Other operating expenses 9,606 2,566 7,040 274 %
Total Operating Expenses 58,511 19,331 39,180 203 %
Loss From Operations (55,669 ) (17,814 ) (37,855 ) 213 %
Other Income (Expense):
Interest income (7 ) -44 %
Dividend and interest income - N/A
Loss on foreign exchange (124 ) - (124 ) N/A
Gain on forgiveness of PPP loan - N/A
Gain on settlement of accounts payable, net - (22 ) -100 %
Change in fair value of derivative and other accrued liabilities (173 ) -140 %
Other (expense) income, net (554 ) (657 ) -638 %
Total Other Income (Expense) (32 ) -1819 %
Net Loss $ (55,119 ) $ (17,846 ) $ (37,273 ) 209 %
Revenues
Total revenue for the year ended December 31, 2021 was $20,940, compared to $6,231 for the year ended December 31, 2020, an increase of $14,709, or 236%.
Revenue from product sales was $15,480 for the year ended December 31, 2021, compared to $4,432 for the year ended December 31, 2020, an increase of $11,048, or 249%. This increase was attributable to increased sales of commercial chargers, DC fast chargers and residential chargers when compared to the same period in 2020 as well as product sales of $5,285 from Blue Corner which we acquired in May 2021.
Charging service revenue for Company-owned and operated charging stations was $2,978 for the year ended December 31, 2021, compared to $773 for the year ended December 31, 2020, an increase of $2,205, or 285%. The increase is due to the increase in utilization of chargers, an increased number of chargers on the Blink network as well as charging service revenues of $1,574 from Blue Corner which we acquired in May 2021.
Network fee revenue was $667 for the year ended December 31, 2021, compared to $345 for the year ended December 31, 2020, an increase of $322, or 93%. The increase was attributable to increases in host owned units as well as billings and invoicing to Property Partners during the year ended December 31, 2021 compared to the year ended December 31, 2020.
Warranty revenue was $220 for the year ended December 31, 2021, compared to $129 for the year ended December 31, 2020, an increase of $91, or 71% The increase was primarily attributable to an increase in warranty contracts sold for year ended December 31, 2021 compared to the year ended December 31, 2020. As of December 31, 2021, we recorded a liability of $10 which represents the estimated cost of existing backlog of known warranty cases.
Grant and rebate revenues were $400 for the year ended December 31, 2021, compared to $22 for the year ended December 31, 2020, an increase of $378, or 1,718%. Grant and rebates relating to equipment and the related installation are deferred and amortized in a manner consistent with the depreciation expense of the related assets over their useful lives. The 2021 revenue was primarily related to recognition of $167 in various state grants associated with the installation of chargers during the year ended December 31, 2021 and the amortization of previous years’ grants and grants/rebates of $218 from Blue Corner which we acquired in May 2021.
Ride-sharing services revenues were $769 during the year ended December 31, 2021, compared to $168 during the year ended December 31, 2020, an increase of $601, or 358%. These revenues are derived from ride-sharing subscription services through a program with the City of Los Angeles, which was associated with the acquisition of BlueLA in September 2020. Revenues for the year ended December 31, 2020 represents revenues from the date of acquisition in September 2020 to December 31, 2020.
Other revenue increased by $64, or 18%, to $426 for the year ended December 31, 2021, compared to $362 for the year ended December 31, 2020. The increase was primarily attributable to Low Carbon Fuel Standard (“LCFS”) revenues generated during the year ended December 31, 2021 compared to the same period in 2020. We generate these revenues based on credits from the electricity utilized by our electric car charging stations as a byproduct from our charging services in the states of California and Oregon and the market value of the credits which declined in 2021 compared to 2020.
Cost of Revenues
Cost of revenues primarily consists of electricity reimbursements, revenue share payments to our Property Partner hosts, the cost of charging stations sold, connectivity charges provided by Telco and other network providers, warranty, repairs and maintenance services, and depreciation of our installed charging stations. Cost of revenues for the year ended December 31, 2021 were $18,098 as compared to $4,714 for the year ended December 31, 2020, an increase of $13,384, or 284%, of which, $6,201 was from Blue Corner which we acquired in May 2021.
There is a degree of variability in our costs in relation to our revenues from period to period, primarily due to:
● electricity reimbursements that are unique to those Property Partner host agreements which provide for such reimbursements;
● revenue share payments are predicated on the contractual obligation under the property partner agreement and the revenue generated by the applicable chargers;
● cost of charging stations sold is predicated on the mix of types of charging stations and parts sold during the period;
● network costs are fixed in nature based on the number of chargers connected to the telco network regardless of whether the charger generates revenue;
● provisions for excess and obsolete inventory; and
● warranty and repairs and maintenance expenses are based on both the number of service cases completed during the period.
Cost of product sales increased by $8,810, or 308%, to $11,670 for the year ended December 31, 2021, compared to $2,860 for the year ended December 31, 2020. The increase was primarily due to the increase in product sales of commercial chargers, DC fast chargers and home residential chargers during the year ended December 31, 2021 compared to the same period in 2020 as well as cost of product sales of $4,750 from Blue Corner which we acquired in May 2021. Furthermore, the year ended December 31, 2021 included a reduction in the provision for excess and obsolete inventory of $105 relating primarily to the increased sales of residential home charger units. The year ended December 31, 2020 included a decrease in the provision for excess and obsolete inventory of $12.
Cost of charging services for company-owned charging stations (electricity reimbursements) increased by $536, or 313%, to $707 for the year ended December 31, 2021, compared to $171 for the year ended December 31, 2020. The increase in 2021 was attributable to the mix of charging stations generating charging service revenues subject to electricity reimbursement
Property Partner host fees increased by $1,121, or 423%, to $1,386 during the years ended December 31, 2021 as compared to $265 during the year ended December 31, 2020. This increase was a result of the mix of chargers generating revenue and their corresponding revenue share percentage payments to Property Partner hosts per their agreements.
Network costs decreased by $62, or 12%, to $454 for the year ended December 31, 2021, compared to $516 for the year ended December 31, 2020. The decrease was primarily a result of non-capitalizable costs incurred during the 2020 period related to upgrades of our network systems.
Warranty and repairs and maintenance costs increased by $561, or 169%, to $892 for the year ended December 31, 2021, compared to $331 for the year ended December 31, 2020. The increase in 2021 was attributable to significant efforts expended to reduce the backlog in warranty and repairs and maintenance cases. As of December 31, 2021, we recorded a liability of $73 which represents the estimated cost of existing backlog of known warranty cases.
Cost of ride-sharing services was $1,458 during the year ended December 31, 2021 compared to $226 during the year ended December 31, 2020, an increase of $1,232, or 545%. These costs are from ride-sharing subscription services through a program with the City of Los Angeles, which was associated with the acquisition of BlueLA in September 2020. Cost of ride-sharing services for the year ended December 31, 2020 represents expenditures from the date of acquisition in September 2020 to December 31, 2020.
Depreciation and amortization expense increased by $1,186, or 344%, to $1,531 for the year ended December 31, 2021, compared to $345 for the year ended December 31, 2020. The increase in depreciation expense was attributable to an increase in the number of EV charging stations including those from the Blue Corner acquisition which we acquired in May 2021 and vehicles purchased in December 2020 for the acquired BlueLA operations.
Operating Expenses
Compensation expense increased by $25,671, or 202%, to $38,389 (consisting of approximately $22,000 of cash compensation and approximately $16,400 of non-cash compensation) for the year ended December 31, 2021, compared to $12,718 (consisting of approximately $11,700 of cash compensation and approximately $1,000 of non-cash compensation) for the year ended December 31, 2020. The increase in compensation expense during the year ended December 31, 2021 was primarily associated with the investment in new personnel and compensation in executive, marketing, sales and operations departments as a result of the anticipated domestic and global growth of the Company. In addition, compensation expense during the year ended December 31, 2021 compared the same period in 2020 increased due to additional personnel in conjunction with the acquisitions of BlueLA and U-Go during 2020 and the acquisition of Blue Corner in May 2021. Also contributing to the increase in compensation expense for the year ended December 31, 2021 is the new employment agreement with our CEO which included increases in cash and equity compensation as well as one-time awards and payments in satisfaction of his 2020 bonuses of $1,280, a restricted stock grant of 19,504 shares of common stock, a grant of 23,862 stock options, and a salary catch-up since the expiration of his prior agreement in June 2020 of $295. Included in non-cash share-based compensation for the year ended December 31, 2021 was $12,570 related to the special four-year performance stock option for the CEO of the Company which is expected to be fully expensed by January 2022.
General and administrative expenses increased by $6,469, or 160%, from $4,047 for the year ended December 31, 2020 to $10,516 for the year ended December 31, 2021. The increase was primarily attributable to increases in accounting, legal, investor relations, marketing, consulting and other professional service expenditures of $4,524. Furthermore, general and administrative expenses increased due to increases in amortization expense and acquisition related expenses of $976 and $355, respectively, related to the Blue Corner acquisition. Also contributing to the increase in general and administrative expenses were operating expenditures related to the 2020 acquisitions of BlueLA and U-Go and the acquisition of Blue Corner which occurred in May 2021.
Other operating expenses increased by $7,040, or 274%, from $2,566 for the year ended December 31, 2020 to $9,606 for the year ended December 31, 2021. The increase was primarily attributable to increases in insurance, software licensing, hardware and software development costs, rent, annual shareholder meeting and property/use tax expenditures of $2,317. Furthermore, increases in travel and vehicle expenses of $401 and $39, respectively, contributed to the increase in other operating expenses for the year ended December 31, 2021 compared to the same period in 2020. Also contributing to the increase in other operating expenses were operating expenditures related to the 2020 acquisitions of BlueLA and U-Go and the acquisition of Blue Corner which occurred in May 2021. Also contributing to the increase in operating expenses is the settlement and payment of $1,000 by the Company to our CEO regarding the transfer of 260,000 shares of the Company’s common stock to a prior institutional investor. In addition, during 2021, we recorded a settlement loss of $2,680 related to the issuance of 60,000 shares of our common stock to our General Counsel in full settlement of any and all potential claims of harassment involving a former executive.
Other Expense
Other income (expense) increased by $582 from ($32) for the year ended December 31, 2020 to $550 for the year ended December 31, 2021. The increase was primarily related to a gain of $856 related to the forgiveness of our PPP Loan in 2021, dividend and interest income of $294 in 2021, partially offset by recognition of losses of $438 related to the sale of marketable securities in 2021 which is included in other (expense) income, net.
Net Loss
Our net loss for the year ended December 31, 2021 increased by $37,273, or 209%, to $55,119 as compared to $17,846 for the year ended December 31, 2020. The increase was primarily attributable to an increase in compensation expense and general and administrative expenses in conjunction with current and anticipated growth of the Company.
Total Comprehensive Loss
Our total comprehensive loss for the year ended December 31, 2021 was $56,465 whereas our total comprehensive loss for the year ended December 31, 2020 was $18,029, an increase of $38,436 for the same reasons as noted above related to the increase in our net loss.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
We measure our liquidity in a number of ways, including the following:
December 31,
Cash $ 174,795 $ 22,342
Working Capital $ 176,303 $ 19,580
Notes Payable (Gross) $ 10 $ 871
During the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, we financed our activities from proceeds derived from debt and equity financings which were raised in prior periods. A significant portion of the funds raised from the sale of capital stock has been used to cover working capital needs and personnel, office expenses and various consulting and professional fees.
For the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, we used cash of $40,570 and $18,070, respectively, in operations. Our cash used for the year ended December 31, 2021 was primarily attributable to our net loss of $55,119, reduced by net non-cash expenses in the aggregate amount of $23,113, and by $8,564 of net cash used in changes in the levels of operating assets and liabilities. Our cash used for the year ended December 31, 2020 was primarily attributable to our net loss of $17,846, reduced by net non-cash expenses in the aggregate amount of $1,590, and by $1,814 of net cash used in changes in the levels of operating assets and liabilities.
During the year ended December 31, 2021, net cash used in investing activities was $30,449, of which, $6,804 was provided in connection with the sale of marketable securities, which was offset by purchases of marketing securities of $7,209, $7,065 was used to purchase charging stations and other fixed assets, $22,742 (net of $243 cash acquired) was used as purchase consideration in connection with the Blue Corner acquisition and $237 was used for engineering services. During the year ended December 31, 2020, cash used in investing activities was $260, of which $2,774 was provided in connection with the sale of marketable securities and $2,547 was used to purchase charging stations and other fixed assets. In connection with the BlueLA acquisition and, in connection with the business combination, the Company acquired $3 of cash. Additionally, the Company acquired $30 of cash in connection with the U-Go Stations, Inc acquisition.
During the year ended December 31, 2021, net cash provided by financing activities was $223,271, of which, $221,333 was attributable to the net proceeds from the sale of common stock from the public offering, $1,693 was attributable to the proceeds from warrant exercises, $307 of proceeds were from option exercises, partially offset by $62 used to pay down our financing liability in connection with internal use software. During the year ended December 31, 2020, net cash provided by financing activities was $36,059, of which $856 was attributable to proceeds from our PPP loan, $19,175 was attributable to the net proceeds from the sale of common stock under our ATM program and $16,265 was attributable to the net proceeds from warrant exercises, partially offset by $72 used to pay down our liability in connection with internal use software and $165 used to repay notes payable.
As of December 31, 2021, we had cash, working capital and an accumulated deficit of $174,795, $176,303 and $242,470, respectively. During the year ended December 31, 2021, we had a net loss of $55,119.
In January 2021, we completed an underwritten registered public offering of 5,660,000 shares of our common stock at a public offering price of $41.00 per share. We received approximately $232,100 in gross proceeds from the public offering, and approximately $221,500 in net proceeds after deducting the underwriting discount and offering expenses paid by us. The public offering was made pursuant to our automatic shelf registration statement on Form S-3 filed with the SEC on January 6, 2021 and prospectus supplement dated January 7, 2021. We are using the net proceeds from the public offering to supplement our operating cash flows to fund EV charging station deployment and, when needed, to finance the costs of acquiring competitive and complementary businesses, products and technologies as a part of our growth strategy, and for working capital and general corporate purposes.
We have not yet achieved profitability and expect to continue to incur cash outflows from operations. It is expected that our operating expenses will continue to increase and, as a result, we will eventually need to generate significant product revenues to achieve profitability. Historically, we have been able to raise funds to support our business operations, although there can be no assurance that we will be successful in raising significant additional funds in the future. We expect that our cash on hand will fund our operations for at least 12 months after the issuance date of the financial statements included in this Annual Report.
Since inception, our operations have primarily been funded through proceeds received in equity and debt financings. We believe we have access to capital resources and continue to evaluate additional financing opportunities. There is no assurance that we will be able to obtain funds on commercially acceptable terms, if at all. There is also no assurance that the amount of funds we might raise will enable us to complete our EV development initiatives or attain profitable operations.
Our operating needs include the planned costs to operate our business, including amounts required to fund working capital and capital expenditures. Our future capital requirements and the adequacy of our available funds will depend on many factors, including our ability to successfully commercialize our products and services, competing technological and market developments, and the need to enter into collaborations with other companies or acquire other companies or technologies to enhance or complement our product and service offerings.
As EV charging requirements and technologies change, driven by federal, state or local regulatory authorities or by EV manufacturers or other technology or services providers for the charging station industry, in particular cellular connectivity technology, we may need to upgrade or adapt our charging station products or introduce new products in order to serve new vehicles, conform to new standards, or adapt new technologies to serve existing customers or new customers at substantial research, development, and network upgrades costs. During 2021, many cellular technology providers announced they will require the upgrade from 2G/3G connectivity to 4G LTE during 2022 (the “Upgrade”). The Upgrade is expected to cost approximately $1,750 to upgrade certain of our owned and operated EV charging stations. As a result of the Upgrade, during the fourth quarter of 2021, the Company deemed the Upgrade was a triggering event in accordance with ASC 360 and, accordingly, assessed the recoverability of its long-lived assets related to its US EV charging stations by performing a recoverability test and determined the estimated undiscounted future cash flows (which included the estimated cash outflows related to the estimated cost of the Upgrade) related to its EV chargers exceeded their carrying value and, accordingly, concluded no impairment existed as of December 31, 2021.
Contractual Obligations and Commitments
We entered into purchase commitments that include purchase orders and agreements in the normal course of business with contract manufacturers, parts manufacturers, vendors for research and development services and outsourced services. As of December 31, 2021, we had purchase commitment of approximately $32,000 of which approximately $13,000 is with a related party, which will become payable upon the suppliers’ delivery of the charging stations, services and other related items. The purchase commitments were made primarily for future sales, deployments of charging stations, inventory management planning and other related items, all of which are expected to be received during the next 12-24 months.
Furthermore, the Company has operating lease obligations over the next five years of approximately $2,100. These operating lease obligations are primarily related to corporate office space, warehousing, and parking spaces related to our ride-sharing services.
Critical Accounting Estimates
The preparation of financial statements and related disclosures must be in conformity with U.S. GAAP. These accounting principles require us to make estimates and judgments that can affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities as of the date of the financial statements as well as the reported amounts of revenue and expense during the periods presented. We believe that the estimates and judgments upon which it relies are reasonably based upon information available to us at the time that it makes these estimates and judgments. To the extent that there are material differences between these estimates and actual results, our financial results will be affected. The accounting policies that reflect our more significant estimates and judgments and which we believe are the most critical to aid in fully understanding and evaluating our reported financial results are described below.
The following is not intended to be a comprehensive list of all of our accounting policies or estimates. Our accounting policies are more fully described in Note 2 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, in our financial statements included at the end of this Annual Report.
Revenue Recognition
We recognize revenue primarily from five different types of contracts:
Charging service revenue - company-owned charging stations - Revenue is recognized at the point when a particular charging session is completed.
Product sales - Revenue is recognized at the point where the customer obtains control of the goods and the Company satisfies its performance obligation, which generally is at the time it ships the product to the customer.
Network fees and other - Represents a stand-ready obligation whereby the Company is obligated to perform over a period of time and, as a result, revenue is recognized on a straight-line basis over the contract term. Network fees are billed annually.
Ride-sharing services - Primarily related to ride-sharing services agreement between the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiary, BlueLA Rideshare, LLC and the City of Los Angeles which allows customers the ability to rent electric vehicles through a subscription service. The Company recognizes revenue over the contractual period of performance of the subscription.
Other - Primarily related to charging service revenue from non-company-owned charging stations. Revenue is recognized from non-company-owned charging stations at the point when a particular charging session is completed in accordance with a contractual relationship between the Company and the owner of the station. Other revenues also comprise revenues generated from alternative fuel credits.
The timing of the Company’s revenue recognition may differ from the timing of payment by its customers. A receivable is recorded when revenue is recognized prior to payment and the Company has an unconditional right to payment. Alternatively, when payment precedes the provision of the related services, the Company records deferred revenue until the performance obligations are satisfied.
Grants, rebates and alternative fuel credits, which are not within the scope of ASC 606, pertaining to revenues and periodic expenses are recognized as income when the related revenue and/or periodic expense are recorded. Grants and rebates related to EV charging stations and their installation are deferred and amortized in a manner consistent with the related depreciation expense of the related asset over their useful lives over the useful life of the charging station.
Stock-Based Compensation
We measure the cost of services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments based on the fair value of the award on the date of grant. The fair value amount of the shares expected to ultimately vest is then recognized over the period for which services are required to be provided in exchange for the award, usually the vesting period. The estimation of stock-based awards that will ultimately vest requires judgment, and to the extent actual results or updated estimates differ from original estimates, such amounts are recorded as a cumulative adjustment in the period that the estimates are revised. We account for forfeitures as they occur.
Long-Lived Assets
Long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the asset may not be recoverable. We assess the recoverability of our long-lived assets by monitoring current selling prices of EV charging units in the open market, the adoption rate of various auto manufacturers in the EV market and projected EV charging utilization at various public EV charging stations throughout our network in determining fair value. An impairment loss would be recognized when estimated future cash flows expected to result from the use of the asset and its eventual disposition are less than its carrying amount.
Income Taxes
We account for income taxes pursuant to the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes pursuant to FASB ASC 740, “Income Taxes.” Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for taxable temporary differences and operating loss carry forwards. Temporary differences are the differences between the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and their tax bases. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted for the effects of changes in tax laws and rates on the date of enactment.
Operating Leases
We determine if an arrangement is a lease at inception. Operating leases are included in operating lease right-of-use (“ROU”) assets and operating lease liabilities in our consolidated balance sheets.
ROU assets represent our right to use an underlying asset for the lease term and lease liabilities represent our obligation to make lease payments arising from the lease. Operating lease ROU assets and liabilities are recognized at commencement date based on the present value of lease payments over the lease term. As most of our leases do not provide an implicit rate, we use an incremental borrowing rate based on the estimated rate of interest for collateralized borrowing over a similar term of the lease payments at commencement date. The operating lease ROU asset also includes any lease payments made and excludes lease incentives. Our lease terms may include options to extend or terminate the lease when it is reasonably certain that we will exercise that option. Lease expense for lease payments is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term.
Goodwill
Goodwill is the excess of consideration paid for an acquired entity over the fair value of the amounts assigned to assets acquired, including other identifiable intangible assets, and liabilities assumed in a business combination. To determine the amount of goodwill resulting from a business combination, the Company performs an assessment to determine the acquisition date fair value of the acquired company’s tangible and identifiable intangible assets and liabilities.
Goodwill is required to be evaluated for impairment on an annual basis or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the asset may be impaired. An entity has the option to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether the existence of events or circumstances leads to a determination that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. These qualitative factors include: macroeconomic and industry conditions, cost factors, overall financial performance and other relevant entity-specific events. If the entity determines that this threshold is met, then the Company may apply a one-step quantitative test and record the amount of goodwill impairment as the excess of a reporting unit’s carrying amount over its fair value, not to exceed the total amount of goodwill allocated to the reporting unit. The Company determines fair value through multiple valuation techniques and weights the results accordingly. The Company is required to make certain subjective and complex judgments in assessing whether an event of impairment of goodwill has occurred, including assumptions and estimates used to determine the fair value of its reporting units. The Company has elected to perform its annual goodwill impairment review on November 1 of each year.
Recently Issued Accounting Standards
Our recently issued accounting standards are included in Note 2 - “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Annual Report.

---

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.
Foreign Currency Risk
We have foreign currency risks related to its revenue and operating expenses denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar, primarily the euro, causing both its revenue and its operating results to be impacted by fluctuations in the exchange rates. Gains or losses from the revaluation of certain cash balances, accounts receivable balances and intercompany balances that are denominated in these currencies impact our net loss. A hypothetical decrease in all foreign currencies against the U.S. dollar of 1% would not result in a material foreign currency loss on foreign-denominated balances, as of December 31, 2021. As our foreign operations expand, its results may be more materially impacted by fluctuations in the exchange rates of the currencies in which it does business. At this time, we do not enter into financial instruments to hedge its foreign currency exchange risk.

---

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA.
The financial statements required by this Item 8 are included in this Annual Report beginning on page.

---

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE.
None.

---

ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Disclosure controls and procedures are designed to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Commission’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, as appropriate, to allow for timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and management is required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost- benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures. Management has designed disclosure controls and procedures that reasonably enable the management including the CEO and CFO to deliberate and take timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
As required by the SEC Rules 13a-15(b) and 15d-15(b), we carried out an evaluation under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on this evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of December 31, 2021 because of a material weakness.
Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Our internal control system was designed to, in general, provide reasonable assurance to our company’s management and board regarding the preparation and fair presentation of published financial statements, but because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
On May 10, 2021, pursuant to a Share Purchase Agreement dated April 21, 2021, the Company through its wholly owned subsidiary in the Netherlands, Blink Holdings, B.V. acquired all of the outstanding capital stock of Blue Corner NV, a Belgian company (“Blue Corner”). Headquartered in Belgium, with sales representative offices in several other European cities, Blue Corner owns and operates an EV charging network across Europe.
As permitted by SEC guidance for newly acquired businesses, because it was not possible to complete an effective assessment of the acquired company’s controls by year-end, management has excluded Blue Corner from its evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures and internal controls over financial reporting and changes therein from the date of such acquisition through December 31, 2021. This subsidiary’s total assets and total revenues represent approximately 4% and 36%, respectively, of the related consolidated financial statement amounts as of and for the year ended December 31, 2021.
Our management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2021. The framework used by management in making that assessment was the criteria set forth in the document entitled “2013 Internal Control - Integrated Framework” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. In performing that assessment management considered the substantial improvements implemented in 2021 to the Company’s internal controls referenced above. Management however concluded that, during the period covered by this report, such internal controls and procedures were not effective as of December 31, 2021 and that a material weakness in internal control over financial reporting existed as described below.
● The Company identified certain design deficiencies in its management and analytical review controls associated with the financial close, revenue and inventory processes. These deficiencies, individually or in the aggregate, combined with inadequate compensating controls, created a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement to the consolidated financial statements might not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Management expects to remediate these control deficiencies during 2022.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
During 2021, management continued to implement improvements to the Company’s internal control system. Throughout the year, from executive management on down, a strong commitment was made to the importance of internal control and to create and maintain an infrastructure to support the Company’s SOX compliance program. The Audit Committee was actively engaged and exercised continuous oversight throughout the process. Further, management and the Audit Committee fostered open and regular dialogue with the Company’s external auditors. Internal control, particularly those relating to subjective judgements, were strengthened and, when possible automated and centralized. Further, improvements included:
● All financially significant business processes and entity-level assessments were documented, evaluated, tested for their adequacy of design.
● The Company’s information technology security and general controls were likewise documented, evaluated and tested for their adequacy of design.
● The Company successfully tested for operational effectiveness its business process and entity level internal controls and information technology general and security controls.
As a result of the internal controls initiatives referenced above, the following 2020 reported material weaknesses have been remediated and are operating effectively:
● The Company maintains effective controls over the management of logical and administrative access.
● The Company completed the operational effectiveness of some of the controls due to the timing of the remediation actions taken.
Except as described above, there were no changes in the Company’s internal control over the financial reporting during the fourth quarter of 2021 that have materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
To the Shareholders and Board of Directors of
Blink Charging Co.
Adverse Opinion on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
We have audited Blink Charging Co. and Subsidiaries (the "Company") internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2021, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. In our opinion, because of the effect of the material weaknesses described in the following paragraph on the achievement of the objectives of the control criteria, the Company has not maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2021, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
A material weakness is a control deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the Company's annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. The following material weaknesses have been identified and included in “Management's Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting”:
● Certain of the Company’s controls associated with the financial close and reporting, inventory and revenue processes were not designed effectively. Specifically, the Company had deficiencies in the design of process level controls. These deficiencies, combined with inadequate compensating review controls, created a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement, individually or in the aggregate, to the consolidated financial statements might not be prevented or detected on a timely basis and represents a material weakness in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
These material weaknesses were considered in determining the nature, timing and extent of audit tests applied in our audit of the fiscal 2021 consolidated financial statements, and this report does not affect our report dated March 16, 2022 on those financial statements.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”), the consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2021 and 2020 and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive loss, changes in shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for the three years ended December 31, 2021 of the Company and our report dated March 16, 2022 expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements.
Explanatory Paragraph - Excluded Subsidiaries
As described in “Management Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting,” management has excluded its wholly-owned subsidiary, Blue Corner NV, from its assessment of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2021 because this entity was acquired by the Company in a purchase business combination during 2021. We have also excluded Blue Corner NV from our audit of internal control over financial reporting. This subsidiary’s total assets and total revenues represent approximately 3.4% and 34.2%, respectively, of the related consolidated financial statement amounts as of and for the year ended December 31, 2021.
Basis for Opinion
The Company's management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying "Management Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting." Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting
A company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company's internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of the inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
/s/ Marcum llp
Marcum LLP
New York, NY
March 16, 2022

---

ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION.
None.

---

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE.
Information required by this item is incorporated by reference from our definitive proxy statement for the 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed within 120 days of our fiscal 2021 year-end.

---

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.
Information required by this item is incorporated by reference from our definitive proxy statement for the 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed within 120 days of our fiscal 2021 year-end.

---

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
Information required by this item is incorporated by reference from our definitive proxy statement for the 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed within 120 days of our fiscal 2021 year-end.

---

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE.
Information required by this item is incorporated by reference from our definitive proxy statement for the 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed within 120 days of our fiscal 2021 year-end.

---

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES.
Information required by this item is incorporated by reference from our definitive proxy statement for the 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed within 120 days of our fiscal 2021 year-end.
PART IV

---

ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES.
(a) EXHIBITS
We have filed the exhibits listed on the accompanying Exhibit Index of this registration statement and below in this Item 15:
Exhibit
Incorporated by Reference
Filed or Furnished
Number
Exhibit Description
Form Exhibit
Filing Date
Herewith
2.1
Share Purchase Agreement, dated April 21, 2021, between the Shareholders of Blue Corner NV and Blink Holdings B.V.
8-K 2.1
05/13/2021
3.1
Articles of Incorporation, as amended most recently on August 17, 2017
10-K 3.1
04/17/2018
3.2
Bylaws, as amended most recently on January 29, 2018
10-K 3.2
04/17/2018
3.3
Certificate of Designations for Series D Preferred Stock
8-K 3.1
02/21/2018
4.1
Warrant Agency Agreement by and between the Company and Worldwide Stock Transfer, LLC and Form of Warrant Certificate for Registered Offering
8-K 4.1
02/21/2018
4.2
Form of Common Stock Purchase Warrant dated April 9, 2018
8-K 4.1
04/19/2018
4.3
Description of the Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
10-K 4.3
04/02/2020
10.1*
Executive Employment Agreement by and between the Company and Michael D. Farkas dated October 29, 2010
10-K 10.17
04/16/2013
10.2*
First Amendment to Executive Employment Agreement by and between the Company and Michael D. Farkas dated December 23, 2014
8-K 10.4
12/29/2014
10.3 *
Second Amendment to Executive Employment Agreement by and between the Company and Michael D. Farkas dated July 24, 2015
10-K 10.4
07/29/2016
10.4 *
Third Amendment to Executive Employment Agreement by and between the Company and Michael D. Farkas dated June 15, 2017
S-1/A 10.7
07/06/2017
10.10
Patent License Agreement, dated March 29, 2012, by and among Car Charging Group, Inc., Balance Holdings, LLC and Michael Farkas
10-K 10.21
04/16/2013
10.11
Patent License Agreement, dated March 11, 2016, by and among Car Charging Group, Inc., Balance Holdings, LLC and Michael Farkas
10-Q 10.3
08/04/2016
10.12
Revenue Sharing Agreement, dated April 3, 2013, by and among Car Charging Group, Inc., EV Pass Holdings, LLC, and Synapse Sustainability Trust, Inc.
8-K 10.2
04/26/2013
10.13
Office Lease Agreement, dated April 20, 2018, between Euro American Group, Inc. and Car Charging Inc.
8-K 10.1
05/15/2018
10.14*
2018 Incentive Compensation Plan
Proxy -
08/14/2018
10.15
Intentionally omitted
Exhibit
Incorporated by Reference
Filed or Furnished
Number
Exhibit Description
Form Exhibit
Filing Date
Herewith
10.16
Intentionally omitted
10.17*
Employment Agreement, dated January 9, 2020, between Blink Charging Co. and Donald Engel
8-K 10.1
01/10/2020
10.18*
Employment Offer Letter, dated February 7, 2020, between Blink Charging Co. and Michael P. Rama
8-K 10.1
02/11/2020
10.20*
Employment Offer Letter, dated as of March 29, 2020, between Blink Charging Co. and Brendan S. Jones
8-K 10.1
04/20/2020
10.21*
Executive Chairman and CEO Employment Agreement, dated May 28, 2021, between Blink Charging Co. and Michael D. Farkas
8-K 10.1
06/04/2021
10.22*
Employment Agreement dated December 27, 2021, between Blink Charging Co. and Brendan Jones
8-K 10.1
12//29/2021
21.1
Subsidiaries of the Registrant
X
23.1
Consent of Marcum LLP
X
31.1
Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of Principal Executive Officer
X
31.2
Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of Principal Financial Officer
X
32.1**
Section 1350 Certification of Principal Executive Officer
X
32.2**
Section 1350 Certification of Principal Financial Officer
X
101.INS
XBRL Instance.
X
101.XSD
XBRL Schema.
X
101.PRE
XBRL Presentation.
X
101.CAL
XBRL Calculation.
X
101.DEF
XBRL Definition.
X
101.LAB
XBRL Label.
X
* Indicates a management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.
** In accordance with SEC Release 33-8238, Exhibits 32.1 and 32.2 are being furnished and not deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act.