EDGAR 10-K Filing

Company CIK: 1720025
Filing Year: 2021
Filename: 1720025_10-K_2021_0001213900-21-018211.json

---

ITEM 1. BUSINESS
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
We were incorporated in Delaware on August 7, 2017 for the purpose of entering into a merger, stock exchange, asset acquisition, stock purchase, recapitalization, reorganization or other similar business combination with one or more businesses or entities (a “business combination”). To date, Allegro’s efforts have been limited to organizational activities, completion of its initial public offering and the evaluation of possible business combinations.
Initial Public Offering
Prior our initial public offering, we issued to Eric Rosenfeld, our Chief Executive Officer, an aggregate of 4,312,500 shares of common stock in exchange for a capital contribution of $25,000, or approximately $0.01 per share. Mr. Rosenfeld then transferred all of the shares to two trusts for the benefit of his immediate family members, and subsequently, a portion of such shares was transferred to the other initial stockholders in exchange for $0.01 per share. In April 2018, the initial stockholders contributed to our capital an aggregate of 575,000 shares for no additional consideration, leaving them with an aggregate of 3,737,500 shares of common stock.
On July 6, 2018, we closed our initial public offering of 14,950,000 units, including 1,950,000 units that were issued pursuant to the exercise in full of the underwriters’ over-allotment option, with each unit consisting of one share of common stock, one right, and one warrant. The initial public offering generated gross proceeds of $149,500,000.
Simultaneously with the consummation of the initial public offering, we consummated the private placement of 372,500 private placement units at a price of $10.00 per private placement unit, generating gross proceeds of $3,725,000. The private placement units were purchased by the initial stockholders, Cantor, and Chardan.
Following the closing of the initial public offering on July 6, 2018, an amount of $149,500,000 ($10.00 per unit) from the net proceeds of the sale of the units and private placement units was placed in the trust account.
Proposed Business Combination
On November 8, 2019, the Company entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (“Merger Agreement”) by and among the Company, Allegro Merger Sub, Inc., a Delaware corporation and wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, TGIF Holdings, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Holdings”), TGIF Midco, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Midco”), and Rohit Manocha, solely in his capacity as the initial representative of the equityholders of Holdings and Midco.
On March 26, 2020, the Company’s shareholders approved an amendment to the Company’s amended and restated certificate of incorporation (“Charter”) to extend the time by which the Company had to complete an initial business combination from March 31, 2020 to April 30, 2020. However, in light of the termination of the Merger Agreement and due to extraordinary market conditions, the Company determined on March 31, 2020 that it would not so amend its Charter.
On March 31, 2020, the Company and Holdings mutually determined, due to extraordinary market conditions and the failure to meet necessary closing conditions, to terminate the Merger Agreement.
Dissolution of Trust Account; Delisting and Deregistration of Securities
Pursuant to the Charter, on March 31, 2020, the Company began the process of liquidating and distributing to its public stockholders their pro rata portion of the funds contained in the Trust Account, including interest earned on the amounts on deposit, less amounts that may be released to the Company to pay franchise and income taxes and up to $100,000 of interest which may be released to the Company to pay dissolution expenses. On April 21, 2020, all of the public shares were redeemed at a per share redemption price of $10.30. As of December 31, 2020, we have an aggregate of $61,268 of restricted cash in connection with the unused portion of our dissolution allowance and allowance for taxes. We expect to distribute such amount, pro rata, to our former public stockholders.
An aggregate of approximately $781,700 of loans made by the initial stockholders to the Company in connection with extensions of time to complete an initial business will not be repaid and will be forgiven if we are unable to consummate a business combination and determine to liquidate and dissolve.
The initial stockholders waived their redemption rights with respect to the common stock issued prior to the Company’s initial public offering and the common stock underlying the Private Units. Accordingly, such initial stockholders did not participate in the redemption and an aggregate of 4,110,000 shares of common stock remain outstanding. Additionally, the Company’s rights and warrants remain outstanding.
On April 20, 2020, Nasdaq filed a Form 25 to delist and deregister the units, common stock, rights, and warrants. Such securities were delisted from Nasdaq as of April 30, 2020 and deregistered under Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act as of July 9, 2020.

---

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
An investment in our securities involves a high degree of risk. You should consider carefully the material risks described below, which we believe represent the material risks related to our business and our securities, together with the other information contained in this annual report on Form 10-K, before making a decision to invest in our securities. This annual report on Form 10-K also contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in the forward-looking statements as a result of specific factors, including the risks described below.
Risks Related to Consummating a Business Combination
The report of our independent registered public accounting firm expresses substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern
As of December 31, 2020, the Company had a cash and restricted cash balance of $216 and $61,268, respectively, and a working capital deficit of $692,087. During the year ended December 31, 2020, the Company has withdrawn $282,032, of interest income to pay its franchise and income taxes and various operating expenses as permitted by the trust agreement. The company has also withdrawn $100,000 to pay dissolution expenses.
In addition, in connection with the Company’s assessment of going concern considerations in accordance with Financial Accounting Standard Board’s Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2014-15, “Disclosures of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern”, management has determined that the liquidity, mandatory liquidation and subsequent dissolution raises substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. No adjustments have been made to the carrying amounts of assets or liabilities should the Company liquidate after December 31, 2020.
We are an emerging growth company with no operating history and no revenue and, accordingly, you have no basis on which to evaluate our ability to achieve our business objective.
We are an emerging growth company with no operating history and no revenue. We will not commence operations until we consummate our initial business combination. Because we lack an operating history, you have no basis upon which to evaluate our ability to achieve our business objective of acquiring one or more operating businesses or entities. If we fail to complete a business combination, we will never generate any operating revenues.
You will be unable to ascertain the merits or risks of any particular target business’ operations.
We may pursue acquisition opportunities in any business sector or geographic region we wish, except that we will not, under our amended and restated certificate of incorporation, be permitted to effectuate a business combination with another blank check company or similar company with nominal operations. If we consummate our initial business combination, we may be affected by numerous risks inherent in the business operations of the entity with which we combine. Because we will seek to acquire businesses that potentially need financial, operational, strategic or managerial redirection, we may be affected by the risks inherent in the business and operations of a financially or operationally unstable entity. Although our officers and directors will endeavor to evaluate the risks inherent in a particular target business, we cannot assure you that we will properly ascertain or assess all of the significant risk factors or that we will have adequate time to complete due diligence. Furthermore, some of these risks may be outside of our control and leave us with no ability to control or reduce the chances that those risks will adversely impact a target business.
Because of our limited resources and the significant competition for business combination opportunities, it may be more difficult for us to complete a business combination.
We expect to encounter intense competition from other entities having a business objective similar to ours, including private investors (which may be individuals or investment partnerships), other blank check companies and other entities, domestic and international, competing for the types of businesses we intend to acquire. Many of these individuals and entities are well-established and have extensive experience in identifying and effecting, directly or indirectly, acquisitions of companies operating in or providing services to various industries. Many of these competitors possess greater technical, human and other resources, or more local industry knowledge than we do and our financial resources will be relatively limited when contrasted with those of many of these competitors. Our ability to compete with respect to the acquisition of certain target businesses will be limited by our available financial resources. This inherent competitive limitation gives others an advantage in pursuing the acquisition of certain target businesses. Any of these obligations may place us at a competitive disadvantage in successfully negotiating a business combination.
Subsequent to consummation of our initial business combination, we may be required to take write-downs or write-offs, restructuring and impairment or other charges that could have a significant negative effect on our financial condition, results of operations and our stock price, which could cause you to lose some or all of your investment.
Even if we conduct extensive due diligence on a target business with which we combine, we cannot assure you that this examination will uncover all material risks that may be presented by a particular target business, or that factors outside of the target business and outside of our control will not later arise. Even if our due diligence successfully identifies the principal risks, unexpected risks may arise and previously known risks may materialize in a manner not consistent with our preliminary risk analysis. As a result, from time to time following our initial business combination, we may be forced to write-down or write-off assets, restructure our operations, or incur impairment or other charges that could result in our reporting losses. Even though these charges may be non-cash items and not have an immediate impact on our liquidity, the fact that we report charges of this nature could contribute to negative market perceptions about us or our securities. In addition, charges of this nature may cause us to violate net worth or other covenants to which we may be subject as a result of assuming pre-existing debt held by a target business or by virtue of our obtaining post-combination debt financing.
We may issue additional common or preferred stock to complete our initial business combination or under an employee incentive plan after consummation of our initial business combination, which would dilute the interest of our stockholders and likely present other risks.
We may issue a substantial number of additional shares of common or preferred stock to complete our initial business combination or under an employee incentive plan after consummation of our initial business combination. The issuance of additional shares of common or preferred stock:
● may significantly dilute the equity interest of existing investors;
● may subordinate the rights of holders of common stock if preferred stock is issued with rights senior to those afforded our common stock; and
● could cause a change in control if a substantial number of shares of common stock is issued, which may affect, among other things, our ability to use our net operating loss carry forwards, if any, and could result in the resignation or removal of our present officers and directors.
We may issue notes or other debt securities, or otherwise incur substantial debt, to complete a business combination, which may adversely affect our financial condition and the value of our stockholders’ investment in us.
Although we have no commitments to issue any notes or other debt securities, otherwise to incur debt, we may choose to incur substantial debt in order to complete our initial business combination. The incurrence of debt could have a variety of negative effects, including:
● default and foreclosure on our assets if our operating revenues or cash flows after an initial business combination are insufficient to meet our debt service obligations;
● acceleration of our obligations to repay the indebtedness, even if we make all principal and interest payments when due, if we breach covenants that require the maintenance of financial ratios or reserves without a waiver or renegotiation of that covenant;
● our immediate payment of all principal and accrued interest, if any, if the debt is payable on demand and the lender demands payment;
● our inability to obtain necessary additional financing if any debt we incur contains covenants restricting our ability to obtain additional financing while the debt is outstanding;
● prohibitions of, or limitations on, our ability to pay dividends on our common stock;
● use of a substantial portion of our cash flow to pay principal and interest on our debt, which will reduce the funds available for dividends on our common stock if declared, as well as for expenses, capital expenditures, acquisitions and other general corporate purposes;
● limitations on our flexibility in planning for and reacting to changes in our business and in the industry in which we operate;
● increased vulnerability to adverse changes in general economic, industry and competitive conditions and adverse changes in government regulation; and
● limitations on our ability to borrow additional amounts for expenses, capital expenditures, acquisitions, debt service requirements, execution of growth strategies and other purposes and other disadvantages compared to our competitors who have less debt.
We do not have a policy with respect to how much debt we may incur. To the extent that the amount of our debt increases, the impact of the effects listed above may also increase.
Resources could be wasted in researching acquisitions that are not consummated, which could materially adversely affect subsequent attempts to locate another target business and consummate our initial business combination.
We anticipate that the investigation of each specific target business and the negotiation, drafting, and execution of relevant agreements, disclosure documents, and other instruments will require substantial management time and attention and substantial costs for accountants, attorneys and others. If we decide not to complete a specific initial business combination, the costs incurred up to that point for the proposed transaction likely would not be recoverable. Furthermore, if we reach an agreement relating to a specific target business, we may fail to consummate our initial business combination for any number of reasons including those beyond our control. Any such event will result in a loss to us of the related costs incurred, which could materially adversely affect subsequent attempts to locate and acquire or merge with another business due to a reduction in the funds available for expenses relating to such efforts.
We are dependent upon our officers and directors; the loss of any one or more of them could adversely affect our ability to complete a business combination.
Our operations depend upon the background, experience and contacts of our officers and directors. We believe that our success depends on the continued service of our officers and directors, at least until we have consummated a business combination. We do not have an employment agreement with, or key-man insurance on the life of, any of our directors or officers. In addition, our executive officers and directors are not required to, and will not, commit their full time to our affairs, which may result in a conflict of interest in allocating their time between our operations and the search for a business combination and their other business commitments. We do not intend to have any full-time employees prior to the consummation of our business combination. Each of our executive officers and directors is engaged in other business endeavors and is not obligated to contribute any specific number of hours per week to our affairs. If our executive officers’ and directors’ other business commitments require them to devote substantial amounts of time in excess of their current commitment levels, it could limit their ability to devote time to our affairs which make it more difficult for us to identify an acquisition target and consummate our business combination.
Our officers and directors are now and may in the future become affiliated with entities engaged in business activities similar to those intended to be conducted by us and, accordingly, may have conflicts of interest in determining to which entity a particular business opportunity should be presented.
Until we consummate our initial business combination, we intend to engage in the business of identifying and combining with one or more businesses or entities. Our executive officers and certain of our directors are affiliated with Legato Merger Corp., a special purpose acquisition company that is seeking an initial business combination. In addition, our officers and directors may in the future become affiliated with other entities that are engaged in the business of acquiring other businesses or entities. In each case, our executive officers and directors’ existing directorships or other responsibilities may give rise to contractual or fiduciary obligations that take priority over any obligation owed to us. Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides that the doctrine of corporate opportunity, or any other analogous doctrine, will not apply to us or any of our officers or directors or in circumstances that would conflict with any fiduciary duties or contractual obligations to other entities they may have. Accordingly, business opportunities that may be attractive to the entities described above will not be presented to us unless such entities have declined to accept such opportunities. As a result, our officers and directors may have conflicts of interest in determining to which entity a particular business opportunity should be presented. We cannot assure you that these conflicts will be resolved in our favor or that a potential target business would not be presented to another entity prior to its presentation to us.
We may engage in a business combination with one or more target businesses that have relationships with entities that may be affiliated with our executive officers, directors or existing stockholders, which may raise potential conflicts of interest.
We may decide to acquire one or more businesses affiliated with our initial stockholders, or our officers and directors. Our officers and directors also serve as officers and board members of other entities. Such entities may compete with us for business combination opportunities. Despite our agreement to obtain an opinion from an independent investment banking firm, a firm that regularly prepares valuation reports on the type of company that we are seeking to acquire or an independent accounting firm regarding the fairness to our stockholders from a financial point of view of a business combination with one or more businesses affiliated with our executive officers, directors or our initial stockholders, potential conflicts of interest still may exist and, as a result, the terms of the business combination may not be as advantageous to us as they would be absent any conflicts of interest.
As the number of special purpose acquisition companies evaluating targets increases, attractive targets may become scarcer and there may be more competition for attractive targets. This could increase the cost of our initial business combination and could even result in our inability to find a target or to consummate an initial business combination.
In recent years, and especially since the fourth quarter of 2020, the number of special purpose acquisition companies that have been formed has increased substantially. Many potential targets for special purpose acquisition companies have already entered into an initial business combination, and there are still many special purpose acquisition companies seeking targets for their initial business combination, as well as many such companies currently in registration. As a result, at times, fewer attractive targets may be available, and it may require more time, more effort and more resources for us to identify a suitable target and to consummate a business combination.
In addition, because there are more companies seeking to enter into an initial business combination with available targets, the competition for available targets with attractive fundamentals or business models may increase, which could cause targets companies to demand improved financial terms. Attractive deals could also become scarcer for other reasons, such as economic or industry sector downturns, geopolitical tensions, or increases in the cost of additional capital needed to close business combinations or operate targets post-business combination. This could increase the cost of, delay or otherwise complicate or frustrate our ability to find and consummate a business combination, and we may not be able to consummate a business combination at all.
Changes in the market for directors and officers liability insurance could make it more difficult and more expensive for us to negotiate and complete an initial business combination.
In recent months, the market for directors and officers liability insurance for special purpose acquisition companies has changed. The premiums charged for such policies have generally increased and the terms of such policies have generally become less favorable. There can be no assurance that these trends will not continue.
The increased cost and decreased availability of directors and officers liability insurance could make it more difficult and more expensive for us to negotiate a business combination. In order to obtain directors and officers liability insurance or modify its coverage as a result of becoming a public company, the post-business combination entity might need to incur greater expense, accept less favorable terms or both. However, any failure to obtain adequate directors and officers liability insurance could have an adverse impact on the post-business combination’s ability to attract and retain qualified officers and directors.
In addition, even after we were to complete a business combination, our directors and officers could still be subject to potential liability from claims arising from conduct alleged to have occurred prior to the initial business combination. As a result, in order to protect our directors and officers, the post-business combination entity will likely need to purchase additional insurance with respect to any such claims (“run-off insurance”). The need for run-off insurance would be an added expense for the post-business combination entity, and could interfere with or frustrate our ability to consummate a business combination.
Our search for a business combination, and any target business with which we ultimately consummate a business combination, may be materially adversely affected by the recent coronavirus (COVID-19) outbreak.
The COVID-19 pandemic has adversely affected, and other events (such as terrorist attacks, natural disasters or a significant outbreak of other infectious diseases) could adversely affect, the economies and financial markets worldwide, and the business of any potential target business with which we consummate a business combination could be materially and adversely affected. Furthermore, we may be unable to complete a business combination if concerns relating to COVID-19 continue to restrict travel, limit our ability to have meetings with potential investors or the target company’s personnel, or if vendors and services providers are unavailable. The extent to which COVID-19 impacts our search for a business combination will depend on future developments, which are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted, including new information which may emerge concerning the severity of COVID-19 and the actions to contain COVID-19 or treat its impact, among others. If the disruptions posed by COVID-19 or other events (such as terrorist attacks, natural disasters or a significant outbreak of other infectious diseases) continue for an extensive period of time, our ability to consummate a business combination, or the operations of a target business with which we ultimately consummate an initial business combination, may be materially adversely affected.
In addition, our ability to consummate a transaction may be dependent on the ability to raise equity and debt financing which may be impacted by COVID-19 and other events (such as terrorist attacks, natural disasters or a significant outbreak of other infectious diseases), including as a result of increased market volatility, decreased market liquidity in third-party financing being unavailable on terms acceptable to us or at all.
Risks Related to the Liquidation of the Trust Account
If we file a bankruptcy petition or an involuntary bankruptcy petition is filed against us that is not dismissed, a bankruptcy court may seek to recover the proceeds from our Trust Account which were distributed to our public stockholders, and the members of our board of directors may be viewed as having breached their fiduciary duties to our creditors, thereby exposing the members of our board of directors and us to claims of punitive damages.
If we file a bankruptcy petition or an involuntary bankruptcy petition is filed against us that is not dismissed, any distributions from our Trust Account received by stockholders could be viewed under applicable debtor/creditor and/or bankruptcy laws as either a “preferential transfer” or a “fraudulent conveyance.” As a result, a bankruptcy court could seek to recover all amounts received by our stockholders. In addition, by making distributions to public stockholders before making provision for creditors, our board of directors may be viewed as having breached its fiduciary duty to our creditors and/or having acted in bad faith, thereby exposing itself and us to claims for punitive damages.
Our stockholders may be held liable for claims by third parties against us to the extent of distributions received by them upon redemption of their shares.
Under the DGCL, stockholders may be held liable for claims by third parties against a corporation to the extent of distributions received by them in a dissolution. The pro rata portion of our trust account distributed to our public stockholders upon the redemption of our public shares may be considered a liquidation distribution under Delaware law. If a corporation complies with certain procedures set forth in Section 280 of the DGCL intended to ensure that it makes reasonable provision for all claims against it, including a 60-day notice period during which any third-party claims can be brought against the corporation, a 90-day period during which the corporation may reject any claims brought, and an additional 150-day waiting period before any liquidating distributions are made to stockholders, any liability of stockholders with respect to a liquidating distribution is limited to the lesser of such stockholder’s pro rata share of the claim or the amount distributed to the stockholder, and any liability of the stockholder would be barred after the third anniversary of the dissolution.
We did not comply with Section 280 of the DGCL when we redeemed our public shares for a pro rata portion of the Trust Account. Therefore, Section 281(b) of the DGCL requires us to adopt a plan, based on facts known to us at such time that will provide for our payment of all existing and pending claims or claims that may be potentially brought against us within the 10 years following our dissolution. However, because we are a blank check company, rather than an operating company, and our operations will be limited to searching for prospective target businesses to acquire, the only likely claims to arise would be from our vendors (such as lawyers or investment bankers) or prospective target businesses. If our plan of distribution complies with Section 281(b) of the DGCL, any liability of stockholders with respect to a liquidating distribution is limited to the lesser of such stockholder’s pro rata share of the claim or the amount distributed to the stockholder, and any liability of the stockholder would likely be barred after the third anniversary of the dissolution. We cannot assure you that we will properly assess all claims that may be potentially brought against us. As such, our stockholders could potentially be liable for any claims to the extent of distributions received by them (but no more) and any liability of our stockholders may extend beyond the third anniversary of such date. Furthermore, if the pro rata portion of our trust account distributed to our public stockholders upon the redemption of our public shares is not considered a liquidation distribution under Delaware law and such redemption distribution is deemed to be unlawful, then pursuant to Section 174 of the DGCL, the statute of limitations for claims of creditors could then be six years after the unlawful redemption distribution, instead of three years, as in the case of a liquidation distribution.
Risks Related to Owning our Securities
Our securities were delisted from the Nasdaq Capital Market, deregistered under Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act, and are not traded on an established trading marked or exchange. Investors will have a limited ability to make transactions in our securities.
Trading of our securities on the Nasdaq Capital Market was suspended as of April 20, 2020. On April 20, 2020, Nasdaq filed a Form 25 to delist and deregister the units, common stock, rights, and warrants. Such securities were delisted from Nasdaq as of April 30, 2020 and deregistered under Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act as of July 9, 2020. Our securities are not currently traded on an established trading market or exchange. There can be no assurance that our securities will be admitted to list or trade on any market or exchange or that, if listed or traded, that we will maintain the requirements for continued listing or trading. A market for our securities may never develop. As a result, holders of our securities may be unable to sell their securities and may lose all of their investment.
Our common stock is classified as a “penny stock” under SEC rules, which means that any broker-dealers who wish to make a market in our stock will be subject to additional compliance requirements.
Our common stock is deemed to be a “penny stock” as defined in the Exchange Act. Penny stocks are stocks (i) with a price of less than five dollars per share; (ii) that are not traded on a recognized national exchange; (iii) whose prices are not quoted on an automated quotation system sponsored by a recognized national securities association; or (iv) whose issuer has net tangible assets less than $2,000,000 (if the issuer has been in continuous operation for at least three years); or $5,000,000 (if continuous operations for less than three years); or with average revenues of less than $6,000,000 for the last three years. The Exchange Act requires broker-dealers dealing in penny stocks to provide potential investors with a document disclosing the risks of penny stocks and to obtain a manually signed and dated written receipt of the document before effecting any transaction in a penny stock for the investor’s account. Potential investors in our common stock are urged to obtain and read such disclosure carefully before purchasing any shares that are deemed to be “penny stock.” Further, the Exchange Act requires broker-dealers dealing in penny stocks to approve the account of any investor for transactions in such stocks before selling any penny stock to that investor. These procedures require the broker-dealer to (i) obtain from the investor information concerning his, her or its financial situation, investment experience and investment objectives; (ii) reasonably determine, based on that information, that transactions in penny stocks are suitable for the investor, and that the investor has sufficient knowledge and experience as to be reasonably capable of evaluating the risks of penny stock transactions; (iii) provide the investor with a written statement setting forth the basis on which the broker dealer made the determination in (ii) above; and (iv) receive a signed and dated copy of such statement from the investor, confirming that it accurately reflects the investor’s financial situation, investment experience and investment objectives. Compliance with these requirements may affect the ability or willingness of broker-dealers to sell our securities, and accordingly would affect the ability of stockholders to sell their securities in the public market. These additional procedures could also limit our ability to raise additional capital in the future.
We may not hold an annual meeting of stockholders until after we consummate a business combination.
We may not hold an annual meeting of stockholders until after we consummate a business combination, and thus may not be in compliance with Section 211(b) of the DGCL, which requires that an annual meeting of stockholders be held for the purposes of electing directors in accordance with a company’s bylaws unless directors are elected by written consent in lieu of such a meeting. Therefore, if our stockholders want us to hold an annual meeting prior to our consummation of a business combination, they may attempt to force us to hold one by submitting an application to the Delaware Court of Chancery in accordance with Section 211(c) of the DGCL.
Changes in laws or regulations, or a failure to comply with any laws and regulations, may adversely affect our business, investments and results of operations.
We are subject to laws and regulations enacted by national, regional and local governments, including in particular, reporting and other requirements under the Exchange Act. Compliance with, and monitoring of, applicable laws and regulations may be difficult, time consuming and costly. Those laws and regulations and their interpretation and application may also change from time to time and those changes could have a material adverse effect on our business, investments and results of operations. In addition, a failure to comply with applicable laws or regulations, as interpreted and applied, could result in fines, injunctive relief or similar remedies which could be costly to us or limit our ability to complete an initial business combination or operate the post-combination company successfully.
If we are unable to complete our initial business combination and determine to liquidate and dissolve, our warrants and rights will expire worthless.
Our outstanding warrants and rights may not be exercised until after the completion of our initial business combination. Accordingly, our warrants and rights will expire worthless if we are unable to consummate a business combination and our board resolves to liquidate and dissolve.
We may amend the terms of the rights in a manner that may be adverse to holders with the approval by the holders of at least 65% of the then outstanding rights.
Our rights were issued in registered form under a Right Agreement between Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company, as rights agent, and us. The Right Agreement provides that the terms of the rights may be amended without the consent of any holder to cure any ambiguity or correct any defective provision. The Right Agreement requires the approval by the holders of at least 65% of the then outstanding rights in order to make any change that adversely affects the interests of the registered holders. Accordingly, we may amend the terms of the rights in a manner adverse to a holder if holders of at least 65% of the then outstanding rights approve of such amendment. Although our ability to amend the terms of the rights with the consent of at least 65% of the then outstanding rights is unlimited, examples of such amendments could be amendments to, among other things, decrease the number of shares of our common stock issuable upon conversion of a right.
We may amend the terms of the warrants in a manner that may be adverse to holders with the approval by the holders of at least 65% of the then outstanding warrants.
Our warrants were issued in registered form under a Warrant Agreement between Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company, as warrant agent, and us. The Warrant Agreement provides that the terms of the warrants may be amended without the consent of any holder to cure any ambiguity or correct any defective provision, but requires the approval by the holders of at least 65% of the then outstanding warrants to make any change that adversely affects the interests of the registered holders. Accordingly, we may amend the terms of the warrants in a manner adverse to a holder if holders of at least 65% of the then outstanding warrants approve of such amendment. Although our ability to amend the terms of the warrants with the consent of at least 65% of the then outstanding warrants is unlimited, examples of such amendments could be amendments to, among other things, increase the exercise price of the warrants, shorten the exercise period or decrease the number of shares of our common stock purchasable upon exercise of a warrant.
A registration statement covering the shares underlying our warrants may not be in place when an investor desires to exercise warrants, thus precluding such investor from being able to exercise its warrants and causing such warrants to expire worthless.
Under the terms of the warrant agreement governing our warrants, we have agreed to use our best efforts to file a registration statement under the Securities Act covering such shares and maintain a current prospectus relating to the common stock issuable upon exercise of the warrants, and to use our best efforts to take such action as is necessary to register or qualify for sale, in those states in which the warrants were initially offered by us, the shares issuable upon exercise of the warrants, to the extent an exemption is not available. We cannot assure you that we will be able to do so. If the shares issuable upon exercise of the warrants are not registered under the Securities Act, we will be required to permit holders to exercise their warrants on a cashless basis under the circumstances specified in the warrant agreement. However, in no event will we be required to issue cash, securities or other compensation in exchange for the warrants if we are unable to register or qualify the shares underlying the warrants under the Securities Act or applicable state securities laws. If the issuance of the shares upon exercise of the warrants is not so registered or qualified, the warrant holder will not be entitled to exercise such warrant and such warrant may have no value and expire worthless. In such event, holders who acquired their warrants as part of a purchase of units will have paid the full unit purchase price solely for the shares of common stock included in the units. If and when the warrants become redeemable by us, we may exercise our redemption right even if we are unable to register or qualify the underlying shares of common stock for sale under all applicable state securities laws.
We may redeem your unexpired warrants prior to their exercise at a time that is disadvantageous to you, thereby making your warrants worthless.
We have the ability to redeem outstanding warrants (excluding any private placement warrants held by our initial stockholders or their permitted transferees) at any time after they become exercisable and prior to their expiration, at $0.01 per warrant, provided that the last reported sales price (or the closing bid price of our common stock in the event the shares of our common stock are not traded on any specific trading day) of the common stock equals or exceeds $18.00 per share for any 20 trading days within a 30 trading-day period ending on the third business day prior to the date we send proper notice of such redemption, provided that on the date we give notice of redemption and during the entire period thereafter until the time we redeem the warrants, we have an effective registration statement under the Securities Act covering the shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of the warrants and a current prospectus relating to them is available. If and when the warrants become redeemable by us, we may exercise our redemption right even if we are unable to register or qualify the underlying securities for sale under all applicable state securities laws. Redemption of the outstanding warrants could force you: (i) to exercise your warrants and pay the exercise price therefor at a time when it may be disadvantageous for you to do so, (ii) to sell your warrants at the then-current market price when you might otherwise wish to hold your warrants or (iii) to accept the nominal redemption price which, at the time the outstanding warrants are called for redemption, is likely to be substantially less than the market value of your warrants.
Our ability to require holders of our warrants to exercise such warrants on a cashless basis will cause holders to receive fewer shares upon their exercise of the warrants than they would have received had they been able to exercise their warrants for cash.
If we call our warrants for redemption, we will have the option to require any holder that wishes to exercise his warrants (including any warrants held by our initial stockholders or their permitted transferees) to do so on a “cashless basis.” If we choose to require holders to exercise their warrants on a cashless basis, the number of shares received by a holder upon exercise will be fewer than it would have been had such holder exercised his warrants for cash. This will have the effect of reducing the potential “upside” of the holder’s investment in our company.
The grant of registration rights to our initial stockholders and purchasers of private placement units may make it more difficult to complete our initial business combination, and the future exercise of such rights may reduce the market price of our common stock.
Pursuant to an agreement entered into concurrently with the consummation of our initial public offering, our initial stockholders, purchasers of private placement units and their permitted transferees can demand that we register the private shares, private placement units, private placement shares, private placement rights and private placement warrants, and the shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of the private placement rights and exercise of the private placement warrants. These registration rights will be exercisable at any time commencing upon the date that such shares are released from transfer restrictions. We will bear the cost of registering these securities. The registration and availability of such a significant number of securities for trading in the public market may reduce the market price of our common stock. In addition, the existence of the registration rights may make our initial business combination more costly or difficult to conclude because the stockholders of the target business may increase the equity stake they seek in the combined entity or ask for more cash consideration to offset the negative impact on the market price of our common stock that is expected when the securities owned by our initial stockholders are registered.
General Risks
The requirements of being a public company may strain our resources and divert management’s attention.
As a public company, we will be subject to the reporting requirements of the Exchange Act, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (which we refer to as the Sarbanes-Oxley Act), the Dodd-Frank Act Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (which we refer to as the Dodd-Frank Act), the listing requirements of Nasdaq and other applicable securities rules and regulations. Compliance with these rules and regulations will increase our legal and financial compliance costs, make some activities more difficult, time-consuming or costly and increase demand on our systems and resources, particularly after we are no longer an “emerging growth company.” The Sarbanes-Oxley Act requires, among other things, that we maintain effective disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting. In order to maintain and, if required, improve our disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting to meet this standard, significant resources and management oversight may be required. As a result, management’s attention may be diverted from other business concerns, which could adversely affect our business and operating results. We may need to hire more employees in the future or engage outside consultants to comply with these requirements, which will increase our costs and expenses.
In addition, changing laws, regulations and standards relating to corporate governance and public disclosure are creating uncertainty for public companies, increasing legal and financial compliance costs and making some activities more time consuming. These laws, regulations and standards are subject to varying interpretations, in many cases due to their lack of specificity, and, as a result, their application in practice may evolve over time as new guidance is provided by regulatory and governing bodies. This could result in continuing uncertainty regarding compliance matters and higher costs necessitated by ongoing revisions to disclosure and governance practices. We intend to invest resources to comply with evolving laws, regulations and standards, and this investment may result in increased general and administrative expenses and a diversion of management’s time and attention from operational activities to compliance activities. If our efforts to comply with new laws, regulations and standards differ from the activities intended by regulatory or governing bodies due to ambiguities related to their application and practice, regulatory authorities may initiate legal proceedings against us and our business may be adversely affected.
However, for as long as we remain an “emerging growth company” as defined in the JOBS Act, we may take advantage of certain exemptions from various reporting requirements that are applicable to “emerging growth companies” including, but not limited to, not being required to comply with the auditor attestation requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation in our periodic reports and proxy statements, and exemptions from the requirement of holding a nonbinding advisory vote on executive compensation and shareholder approval of any golden parachute payments not previously approved. We may take advantage of these reporting exemptions until we are no longer an “emerging growth company.”
We will remain an emerging growth company until the earlier of (1) the last day of the fiscal year (a) following the fifth anniversary of the completion of our initial public offering, (b) in which we have total annual gross revenue of at least $1.07 billion, or (c) in which we are deemed to be a large accelerated filer, which means the market value of our shares of common stock that are held by non-affiliates exceeds $700 million as of the prior June 30, and (2) the date on which we have issued more than $1.0 billion in non-convertible debt during the prior three year period.
As an “emerging growth company,” we cannot be certain if the reduced disclosure requirements applicable to emerging growth companies will make our common stock less attractive to investors.
We are an “emerging growth company,” as defined in the JOBS Act, and we may take advantage of certain exemptions from various reporting requirements that are applicable to other public companies that are not “emerging growth companies” including, but not limited to, not being required to comply with the auditor attestation requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation in our periodic reports and proxy statements, and exemptions from the requirements of holding a nonbinding advisory vote on executive compensation and shareholder approval of any golden parachute payments not previously approved. Additionally, as an emerging growth company, we have elected to delay the adoption of new or revised accounting standards that have different effective dates for public and private companies until those standards apply to private companies. As such, our financial statements may not be comparable to companies that comply with all public company accounting standards. We cannot predict if investors will find our common stock less attractive because we may rely on these exemptions. If some investors find our common stock less attractive as a result, there may be a less active trading market for our common stock and our share price may be more volatile.
Compliance obligations under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act may make it more difficult for us to effectuate a business combination, require substantial financial and management resources, and increase the time and costs of completing an acquisition.
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act requires that we maintain a system of internal controls and that we evaluate and report on such system of internal controls over financial reporting. In addition, once we are no longer an “emerging growth company,” we must have our system of internal controls over financial reporting audited. The fact that we are a blank check company makes compliance with the requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act particularly burdensome on us as compared to other public companies because a target company with which we seek to complete a business combination may not be in compliance with the provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act regarding adequacy of its internal controls over financial reporting. The development of the internal controls of any such entity to achieve compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act may increase the time and costs necessary to complete any such acquisition.
Provisions in our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and Delaware law may inhibit a takeover of us, which could limit the price investors might be willing to pay in the future for our common stock and could entrench management.
Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation contains provisions that may discourage unsolicited takeover proposals that stockholders may consider to be in their best interests. These provisions include a staggered board of directors and the ability of the board of directors to designate the terms of and issue new series of preferred shares, which may make more difficult the removal of management and may discourage transactions that otherwise could involve payment of a premium over prevailing market prices for our securities.
Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides, subject to limited exceptions, that the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware will be the sole and exclusive forum for certain stockholder litigation matters, which could limit our stockholders’ ability to obtain a favorable judicial forum for disputes with us or our directors, officers, employees or stockholders.
Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation requires, to the fullest extent permitted by law, that derivative actions brought in our name, actions against directors, officers and employees for breach of fiduciary duty and other similar actions may be brought only in the Court of Chancery in the State of Delaware and, if brought outside of Delaware, the stockholder bringing the suit will be deemed to have consented to service of process on such stockholder’s counsel. Any person or entity purchasing or otherwise acquiring any interest in shares of our capital stock shall be deemed to have notice of and consented to the forum provisions in our amended and restated certificate of incorporation.
This choice of forum provision may limit a stockholder’s ability to bring a claim in a judicial forum that it finds favorable for disputes with us or any of our directors, officers, other employees or stockholders, which may discourage lawsuits with respect to such claims. Alternatively, if a court were to find the choice of forum provision contained in our amended and restated certificate of incorporation to be inapplicable or unenforceable in an action, we may incur additional costs associated with resolving such action in other jurisdictions, which could harm our business, operating results and financial condition.

---

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
None.

---

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
We maintain our principal executive offices at 777 Third Avenue, 37th floor, New York, NY 10017. The cost for this space was included in the $12,500 per-month fee Crescendo Advisors II, LLC (“Crescendo”), an entity controlled by Mr. Rosenfeld, charged us for general and administrative services pursuant to a letter agreement between us and Crescendo Advisors II, LLC. The company and Crescendo have agreed to suspend payment on this agreement on March 31, 2020. We consider our current office space adequate for our current operations.

---

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
None.

---

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURE
ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
Not applicable.
PART II

---

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
Market Information
Prior to their delisting and deregistration, our units, common stock, rights, and warrants were listed on the Nasdaq Capital Market, or Nasdaq, under the symbols “ALGRU,” “ALGR,” “ALGRR” and “ALGRW,” respectively. The last trading date of the Company’s securities on the Nasdaq Capital Market was Monday, April 20, 2020.
Holders
As of March 29, 2021, there were 18 holders of record of our common stock, 16 holder of record of our warrants, and 16 holder of record of our rights.
Dividends
We did not pay any cash dividends and we do not intend to pay cash dividends in the foreseeable future.
Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans
None.
Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities
None.
Purchases of Equity Securities by Issuer and Affiliates
No purchases of our equity securities have been made by us or affiliated purchasers within the fourth quarter of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020.

---

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
Not applicable.

---

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our Financial Statements and footnotes thereto contained in this annual report.
Overview
We are a blank check company formed on August 7, 2017 for the purpose of effecting a merger, share exchange, asset acquisition, share purchase, recapitalization, reorganization or other similar business combination with one or more businesses or entities. Our efforts in identifying a prospective target business are not limited to a particular industry or geographic region of the world.
Initial Public Offering
Prior to our initial public offering, we issued to Eric Rosenfeld, our Chief Executive Officer, an aggregate of 4,312,500 shares of common stock in exchange for a capital contribution of $25,000, or approximately $0.01 per share. Mr. Rosenfeld then transferred all of the shares to two trusts for the benefit of his immediate family members, and subsequently, a portion of such shares was transferred to the other initial stockholders in exchange for $0.01 per share. In April 2018, the initial stockholders contributed to capital an aggregate of 575,000 shares for no additional consideration, leaving them with an aggregate of 3,737,500 shares of common stock.
On July 6, 2018, we closed our initial public offering of 14,950,000 units, including 1,950,000 units that were issued pursuant to the exercise in full of the underwriters’ over-allotment option, with each unit consisting of one share of common stock, one right, and one warrant. The initial public offering generated gross proceeds of $149,500,000.
Simultaneously with the consummation of the initial public offering, we consummated the private placement of 372,500 private placement units at a price of $10.00 per private placement unit, generating gross proceeds of $3,725,000. The private placement units were purchased by the initial stockholders, Cantor, and Chardan.
Following the closing of the Initial Public Offering on July 6, 2018, an amount of $149,500,000 ($10.00 per Unit) from the net proceeds of the sale of the Units in the Initial Public Offering and the Private Units was placed in a trust account (“Trust Account”) and was invested in United States government treasury bills, bonds or notes, having a maturity of 180 days or less or in money market funds meeting certain conditions under Rule 2a-7 promulgated under the Investment Company Act.
Proposed Business Combination
On November 8, 2019, the Company entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (“Merger Agreement”) by and among the Company, Allegro Merger Sub, Inc., a Delaware corporation and wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, TGIF Holdings, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Holdings”), TGIF Midco, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Midco”), and Rohit Manocha, solely in his capacity as the initial representative of the equityholders of Holdings and Midco.
On March 26, 2020, the Company’s shareholders approved an amendment to the Company’s amended and restated certificate of incorporation (“Charter”) to extend the time by which the Company has to complete an initial business combination from March 31, 2020 to April 30, 2020. However, in light of the termination of the Merger Agreement and due to extraordinary market conditions, the Company determined on March 31, 2020 that it would not so amend its Charter.
On March 31, 2020, the Company and Holdings mutually determined, due to extraordinary market conditions and the failure to meet necessary closing conditions, to terminate the Merger Agreement.
Dissolution of Trust Account; Delisting and Deregistration of Securities
Pursuant to the Charter, on March 31, 2020, the Company began the process of liquidating and distributing to its public stockholders their pro rata portion of the funds contained in the Trust Account, including interest earned on the amounts on deposit, less amounts that may be released to the Company to pay franchise and income taxes and up to $100,000 of interest which may be released to the Company to pay dissolution expenses. On April 21, 2020, all of the public shares were redeemed at a per share redemption price of $10.30. As of December 31, 2020, we have an aggregate of $61,268 of restricted cash in connection with the unused portion of our dissolution allowance and allowance for taxes. We expect to distribute such amount, pro rata, to our former public stockholders.
The initial stockholders waived their redemption rights with respect to the common stock issued prior to the Company’s initial public offering and the common stock underlying the Private Units. Accordingly, such initial stockholders did not participate in the redemption and an aggregate of 4,110,000 shares of common stock remain outstanding. Additionally, the Company’s rights and warrants remain outstanding.
On April 20, 2020, Nasdaq filed a Form 25 to delist and deregister the units, common stock, rights, and warrants. Such securities were delisted from Nasdaq as of April 30, 2020 and deregistered under Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act as of July 9, 2020.
February 2021 Promissory Note
The Company issued an unsecured promissory note totaling $5,000 to Eric S. Rosenfeld, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, in February 2021. The note is non-interest bearing and payable on demand.
Critical Accounting Policy
The preparation of financial statements and related disclosures in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and income and expenses during the periods reported. Actual results could materially differ from those estimates. The Company has identified the following critical accounting policy:
Common stock subject to possible redemption
The Company accounts for its common stock shares subject to possible redemption in accordance with the guidance in Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 480 “Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity.” Common stock subject to mandatory redemptions (if any) is classified as a liability instrument and is measured at fair value. Conditionally redeemable common stock (including common stock that feature redemption rights that are either within the control of the holder or subject to redemption upon the occurrence of uncertain events not solely within the Company’s control) is classified as temporary equity. At all other times, common stock is classified as stockholders’ equity. The Company’s common stock features certain redemption rights that are considered to be outside of the Company’s control and subject to occurrence of uncertain future events. Upon redemption, we were required to distribute to the public stockholders their pro rata portion of the funds contained in the Trust Account, including interest earned on the amounts on deposit, less amounts that may be released to the Company to pay franchise and income taxes and up to $100,000 of interest which may be released to the Company to pay dissolution expenses. Accordingly, during the year ended December 31, 2020, pursuant to the Charter, all outstanding Public Shares were redeemed on April 21, 2020 at a per share redemption price of approximately $10.30 per Public Share. As of December 31, 2020, we have an aggregate of $61,268 of restricted cash in connection with the unused portion of our dissolution allowance and allowance for taxes. We expect to distribute such amount, pro rata, to our former public stockholders.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
The Company’s management does not believe that any recently issued, but not yet effective, accounting pronouncements, if currently adopted, would have a material effect on the Company’s financial statements.
Results of Operations
For the year ended December 31, 2020, we had net income of $40,085, which consisted of operating costs of $264,836, and an income tax provision of $69,586, offset by investment income from cash and marketable securities held in the Trust Account and other income of $374,507.
For the year ended December 31, 2019, we had net income of $1,927,147, which consisted of interest income from our trust account of $3,234,522 offset by operating expenses of $523,845 and franchise and income taxes of $132,000 and $651,530, respectively.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
We presently have no revenue; our net income of $40,085 for the year ended December 31, 2020 consists primarily of interest income on the trust account. Through December 31, 2020, our liquidity needs were satisfied through receipt of $356,167 in interest income on the trust account, and $18,340 of other income.
The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming we will continue as a going concern, which contemplates, among other things, the realization of assets and satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. As of December 31, 2020, we had a working capital deficit of $692,087. Further, we have incurred and expect to continue to incur significant costs in pursuit of our financing and acquisition plans. Our plans to raise capital or to consummate an initial business combination may not be successful. These matters, among others, raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. Based on the foregoing, we currently do not have sufficient cash and working capital to meet our needs through a business combination unless our initial stockholders provide us additional funds for our working capital needs, or we obtain other financing.
The accompanying financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary if we are unable to continue as a going concern.
Related Party Transactions
Private Shares
In connection with Allegro’s organization in August 2017, Allegro issued to Eric Rosenfeld, the Chief Executive Officer, an aggregate of 4,312,500 shares of common stock in exchange for a capital contribution of $25,000, or approximately $0.01 per share. The foregoing issuance was made pursuant to the exemption from registration contained in Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act. Prior to the initial public offering, Mr. Rosenfeld then transferred all of the shares to two trusts for the benefit of his immediate family members, and subsequently, the trusts transferred a portion of such private shares to the other initial stockholders in exchange for $0.01 per share. In April 2018, the initial stockholders contributed to Allegro’s capital an aggregate of 575,000 shares for no additional consideration, leaving them with an aggregate of 3,737,500 private shares.
The private shares are identical to the shares of common stock included in the units sold in the initial public offering. However, the initial stockholders have agreed (A) not to transfer, assign or sell any of their private until the earlier to occur of: (i) one year after the completion of Allegro’s initial business combination or (ii) the date on which Allegro completes a liquidation, merger, stock exchange or other similar transaction after the initial business combination that results in all stockholders having the right to exchange their shares of common stock for cash, securities or other property, or (iii) if the last sale price of our common stock equals or exceeds $12.00 per share (as adjusted for stock splits, stock dividends, reorganizations, recapitalizations and the like) for any 20 trading days within any 30-trading day period commencing at least 150 days after Allegro’s initial business combination, and (B) each holder of private shares has agreed to waive his, her or its redemption rights with respect to the private shares, (i) in connection with the consummation of a business combination, (ii) in connection with a stockholder vote to amend Allegro’s charter to modify the substance or timing of Allegro’s obligation to redeem 100% of the public shares if Allegro does not complete an initial business combination by the required deadline, (iii) if Allegro fails to consummate an initial business combination by the required deadline, and (iv) upon Allegro’s liquidation. Additionally, the initial stockholders have agreed to vote their private shares in favor of the initial business combination.
Promissory Notes
The Company issued two unsecured promissory notes totaling $30,000 to Eric S. Rosenfeld, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, in 2017. On February 5, 2018 the Company issued a $35,000 principal amount unsecured promissory note to Eric S. Rosenfeld. The notes were non-interest bearing. The notes were repaid in full on July 13, 2018.
The Company issued two additional unsecured promissory notes totaling $13,900 to Eric S. Rosenfeld, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, in July and November 2020 respectively. The notes are non-interest bearing, payable on demand and outstanding as of December 31, 2020.
Notes Payable - Related Parties
Certain individuals and entities (the “Contributors”) that participated in the private placement of units that occurred simultaneously with the Company’s initial public offering contributed to the Company an aggregate amount of $781,700, representing contributions covering a prorated amount of $0.02 per unconverted public share for the partial month of January 2020 and $0.025 per unconverted public share for each of February 2020 and March 2020 (each, a “Contribution”). The Contributions will not bear any interest and will be repayable by the Company to the Contributors upon consummation of an initial business combination. The Contributions will be forgiven if the Company is unable to consummate an initial business combination except to the extent of any funds held outside of the Company’s trust account.
The Company deposited $223,342, the first contribution on January 6, 2020, into the trust account established in connection with the Company’s initial public offering. The Company deposited the second Contribution of $279,178 on January 31, 2020, and deposited the third Contribution of $279,180 on March 2, 2020, in each case, to the same trust account; provided that any such additional Contribution was only to be made if the previously announced merger agreement with TGI Fridays is still then in effect, or, if such agreement is earlier terminated, the Board of Directors of the Company by majority vote determines to require such additional Contribution.
On March 31, 2020, the Company and Holdings mutually determined, due to extraordinary market conditions and the failure to meet necessary closing conditions, to terminate the Merger Agreement.
An aggregate of approximately $781,700 principal amount of loans associated with the extension were outstanding as of December 31, 2020. The loans made by the Contributors will not be repaid and will be forgiven if we are unable to consummate a business combination and determine to liquidate and dissolve.
Administrative Service Fee
The Company presently occupies office space provided by Crescendo an entity controlled by Eric Rosenfeld, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer. Crescendo has agreed that until the Company consummates a business combination, it will make such office space, as well as general and administrative services including utilities and administrative support, available to the Company as may be required by the Company from time to time. The Company agreed to pay an aggregate of $12,500 per month for such services commencing on the effective date of the initial public offering. The Company and Crescendo agreed to suspend payment on this agreement on March 31, 2020. The Company expensed and paid the affiliate $37,500 and $150,000 for such services for the year ended December 31, 2020, and 2019, respectively.
Private Placement Units
Simultaneous with the consummation of the initial public offering, Allegro consummated the private placement of 372,500 private placement units at a price of $10.00 per private placement unit, generating total proceeds of $3,725,000. The private placement units were purchased by the initial stockholders, Cantor and Chardan.
Allegro’s initial stockholders, Cantor and Chardan have the right to require Allegro to register the private placement units for resale, as described below under “-Registration Rights”. Allegro will bear the costs and expenses of filing any such registration statements.
The private placement rights are identical to the rights that were sold as part of the units in Allegro’s initial public offering. The private placement warrants are non-redeemable so long as they are held by the initial stockholders or their permitted transferees. The private placement warrants may also be exercised by the initial stockholders or their permitted transferees, for cash or on a cashless basis. Other than as stated above, the private placement warrants have terms and provisions that are identical to those of the warrants sold as part of the units in Allegro’s initial public offering. The private placement units are not transferrable until 30 days after the consummation of Allegro’s initial business combination; provided, however, that the transfer restrictions will lapse earlier if following the completion of Allegro’s initial business combination Allegro completes a liquidation, merger, stock exchange or other similar transaction that results in all of Allegro’s stockholders having the right to exchange their shares of common stock for cash, securities or other property.
Registration Rights
The holders of the private shares, private placement units (including securities contained therein) and warrants that may be issued upon conversion of working capital loans that may be made by Allegro’s initial stockholders, officers, directors or their affiliates will have the right to require Allegro to register under the Securities Act a sale of any securities held by them pursuant to a registration rights agreement. These holders will be entitled to make up to three demands, excluding short form registration demands, except that Cantor, Chardan, and/or their designees may only make a demand registration (i) on one occasion and (ii) during the five year period beginning on July 2, 2018, the effective date of Allegro’s registration statement in connection with Allegro’s initial public offering. In addition, these holders will have “piggy-back” registration rights allowing them to include their securities in other registration statements filed by Allegro. Cantor, Chardan, and/or their designees may participate in a “piggy-back” registration only during the seven year period beginning on July 2, 2018. Allegro will bear the costs and expenses of filing any such registration statements.
Off-balance sheet financing arrangements
We did not have any off-balance sheet arrangements as of December 31, 2020 and 2019.
Contractual obligations
We do not have any long-term debt, capital lease obligations, operating lease obligations or long-term liabilities.
As discussed above, we entered into an agreement to pay an affiliate of our Chief Executive Officer an aggregate monthly fee of $12,500 for office space and office and administrative support provided to the Company. The company and the affiliate have agreed to suspend payment on this agreement on March 31, 2020.
We have engaged our underwriters as advisors in connection an initial business combination to assist us in holding meetings with our shareholders to discuss the potential business combination and the target business’ attributes, introduce us to potential investors that are interested in purchasing our securities, assist us in obtaining shareholder approval for the business combination and assist us with our press releases and public filings in connection with the business combination. The Underwriting Agreement provided that a deferred underwriting discount of 3.5% of the gross offering proceeds of the initial public offering, excluding the over-allotment option, and 5.5% of the gross proceeds of the over-allotment option, or $5,622,500 in the aggregate (“Deferred Underwriting Discount”) would only be payable to the underwriters from the amounts held in the Trust Account solely in the event the Company completed its initial Business Combination. As previously indicated, the Company was unable to consummate its initial business combination in the time period required by the Charter and, accordingly, distributed the proceeds held in the Trust Account to public stockholders. As a result, the Deferred Underwriting Discount is no longer owed.

---

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Not applicable.

---

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
Reference is made to Pages through comprising a portion of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

---

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE.
On June 23, 2020, the Company engaged Malone Bailey, LLP (“Malone”) as its principal accountant to review the Company’s financial statements for the quarter ended March 31, 2020. Malone replaced WithumSmith+Brown, PC (“Withum”), who was dismissed as the Company’s principal accountant on the same date. The decision to change principal accountants was approved by the Company’s audit committee.
Withum’s report on the financial statements for each of the past two fiscal years contained an explanatory paragraph relating to the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern as described in the notes to the Company’s consolidated financial statements for each such fiscal year. Withum’s report for each of the past two fiscal years did not otherwise contain an adverse opinion or a disclaimer of opinion and was not otherwise qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope, or accounting principles.
During the Company’s two most recent fiscal years and the subsequent interim period preceding the change in principal accountants, the Company did not have any disagreements with Withum on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedure, which disagreement, if not resolved to the satisfaction of Withum, would have caused it to make reference to the subject matter of the disagreement in connection with its report. No “reportable events” (as described in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K) occurred within the Company’s two most recent fiscal years or during the subsequent interim period preceding the change in principal accountants.
During the Company’s two most recent fiscal years and the subsequent interim period preceding the change in principal accountants, the Company did not consult Malone regarding either the application of accounting principles to a specified transaction, either completed or proposed, or the type of audit opinion that might be rendered on the Company’s financial statements; or any matter that was either the subject of a disagreement (as described above) or a “reportable event” (as described in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K).

---

ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial and accounting officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020, as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act. Based on this evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial and accounting officer have concluded that during the period covered by this annual report, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective.
Disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in our Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f). The design of any system of controls is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions, regardless of how remote. All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation.
We carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting as of December 31, 2020. In making this assessment, our management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in “Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013).” Based on this assessment, management believes that, as of December 31, 2020, our internal control over financial reporting was effective based on those criteria.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended December 31, 2020 covered by this annual report on Form 10-K that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Independent Registered Accountant’s Internal Control Attestation
The JOBS Act permits an emerging growth company such as us to take advantage of specified reduced reporting and other requirements that are otherwise applicable generally to public companies. Among these provisions is an exemption from the auditor attestation requirement under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 in the assessment of the emerging growth company’s internal control over financial reporting. We have elected to rely on this exemption and are not providing such an attestation from our independent registered public accounting firm.

---

ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION
None.
PART III

---

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Directors and Executive Officers
Name
Age
Title
Eric S. Rosenfeld
Chief Executive Officer
David D. Sgro
Chairman of the Board and Chief Operating Officer
Adam H. Jaffe
Chief Financial Officer
John P. Schauerman
Director
Adam J. Semler
Director
Robert Michael Deluce
Director
Eric S. Rosenfeld, age 63, has served as chief executive officer of Allegro since Allegro’s inception in August 2017 and served as chairman of the board from Allegro’s inception until April 2018. Since June 2020, Mr. Rosenfeld has served as the Chief SPAC officer of Legato Merger Corp. (“Legato”), a Special Purpose Acquisition Company that completed an IPO in January 2021. In addition, Mr. Rosenfeld has served as the President and Chief Executive Officer of Crescendo Partners, L.P., a New York-based investment firm, since its formation in November 1998. Prior to Crescendo Partners, L.P., from 1985 to 1998, Mr. Rosenfeld served as Managing Director of CIBC Oppenheimer, an investment bank and financial services company. Mr. Rosenfeld also serves on the board of directors for several other companies, including Primo Water Corp (NYSE: PRMW), a water delivery and filtration company, CPI Aerostructures, Inc. (NYSE American: CVU), a manufacturer of structural aircraft parts for fixed wing aircraft and helicopters in both the commercial and defense markets, Pangea Logistics Solutions Ltd. (Nasdaq: PANL) (and Quartet Merger Corp. prior to its merger with Pangea Logistics Solutions Ltd., for which he also served as Chief Executive Officer), a maritime logistics and shipping company, and Aecon Group, Inc. (TSE: ARE), a construction company. Mr. Rosenfeld previously served on the board of directors of several companies, including Canaccord Genuity Group Inc (TSE: CF), a Toronto Stock Exchange listed investment bank, NextDecade LLC (Nasdaq: NEXT) (and Harmony Merger Corp. prior to its merger with NextDecade LLC, for which he also served as Chief Executive Officer), a natural gas development company, Absolute Software Corporation (TSE: ABT), a provider of security and management for computers and ultra-portable devices, SAExploration Holdings Inc. (Nasdaq: SAEX) (and Trio Merger Corp. prior to its merger with SAEX, for which he also served as Chief Executive Officer), a geophysical services company, Primoris Services Corporation (Nasdaq: PRIM) (and Rhapsody Acquisition Corporation prior to its merger with PRIM, for which he also served as Chief Executive Officer), a holding company for specialty contractor and infrastructure businesses, DALSA Corp., a digital imaging and semiconductor manufacturer, and Hill International Inc. (NYSE: HIL) (and Arpeggio Acquisition Corp. prior to its merger with HIL, for which he also served as Chief Executive Officer), a construction project management firm. Mr. Rosenfeld is a regular guest lecturer at Columbia Business School and has served on numerous panels at Queen’s University Business Law School Symposia, McGill Law School, the World Presidents’ Organization and the Value Investing Congress. He is a senior faculty member at the Director’s College. He has also been a guest host on CNBC. Mr. Rosenfeld received an A.B. in economics from Brown University and an M.B.A. from the Harvard Business School.
Allegro believes Mr. Rosenfeld is well-qualified to serve as a member of the board of Allegro after consummation of the Transactions due to his extensive public company experience and investment expertise.
David D. Sgro, CFA, age 44, has served as a chairman of Allegro’s board of directors since April 2018, Chief Operating Officer since Allegro’s inception in August 2017, as well as Chief Financial Officer from November 2017 to April 2018. Mr. Sgro has served as the CEO and as a director of Legato since its inception in June 2020. In addition, Mr. Sgro has served as Senior Managing Director of Crescendo Partners, L.P., a New York-based investment firm, since December 2014, and has held numerous positions with Crescendo Partners, L.P. since December 2005. Mr. Sgro has also served as the Director of Research for Jamarant Capital, L.P., a private investment partnership, since January 2016. Mr. Sgro also serves on the board of directors of several other companies, including Hill International Inc. (NYSE: HIL), a construction project management firm, and Pangea Logistics Solutions Ltd. (Nasdaq: PANL) (and Quartet Merger Corp. prior to its merger with Pangea Logistics Solutions Ltd., for which he also served as Chief Financial Officer), a maritime logistics and shipping company. Mr. Sgro previously served on the board of directors of several companies, including NextDecade LLC (Nasdaq: NEXT) (and Harmony Merger Corp. prior to its merger with NextDecade LLC), a natural gas development company, SAExploration Holdings Inc. (Nasdaq: SAEX) (and Trio Merger Corp. prior to its merger with SAEX, for which he also served as Chief Financial Officer), a geophysical services company, Imvescor Restaurant Group, a restaurant franchisor, COM DEV International Ltd., a global designer and manufacturer of space hardware, Bridgewater Systems, Inc., a telecommunications software company, Primoris Services Corporation (Nasdaq: PRIM) (and Rhapsody Acquisition Corporation prior to its merger with PRIM, for which he also served as Chief Financial Officer), a holding company for specialty contractor and infrastructure businesses, and BSM Technologies, Inc., a GPS enabled fleet management service provider. Mr. Sgro received a B.S. in Finance from The College of New Jersey and an M.B.A. from Columbia Business School. Mr. Sgro is an adjunct faculty member at The College of New Jersey and a regular guest lecturer at Columbia Business School. Allegro believes Mr. Sgro is well-qualified to serve as a member of the board of Allegro after consummation of the Transactions due to his public company and operational experience.
Adam H. Jaffe, age 30, has served as Allegro’s Chief Financial Officer since April 2018. Mr. Jaffe has served as Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of Legato since its inception in June 2020. Mr. Jaffe joined Crescendo Partners, LP in February 2018 as the fund’s Chief Financial Officer and Chief Compliance Officer. Mr. Jaffe also serves as the Chief Financial Officer and Chief Compliance Officer for Jamarant Capital, L.P., an investment firm founded in 2015. Prior to joining Crescendo Partners LP, Mr. Jaffe was the Senior Fund Accountant for the real estate private equity fund, GTIS Partners LP, from September 2016 to February 2018. While at GTIS Partners, Mr. Jaffe focused on the development of residential homes, land development, and single-family homes for rental properties across the United State and Brazil. From September 2014 to September 2016, Mr. Jaffe worked at EisnerAmper LLP. Mr. Jaffe received a B.S. in Accounting from The Pennsylvania State University, with a minor degree in Finance. He is a New York State Certified Public Accountant (CPA).
John P. Schauerman, age 64, has served as a member of Allegro’s board of directors since April 2018. Mr. Schauerman served as a member of Harmony Merger Corp.’s board of directors from July 2014 until its merger with NextDecade LLC. Mr. Schauerman served as a director of Quartet Merger Corp. from its inception in April 2013 until its merger with Pangea Logistics Solutions Ltd. in October 2014. Mr Schauerman has served on the Board of Primoris Services Corporation (NASDAQ: PRIM) since November 2016. He previously served as executive vice president, corporate development of Primoris from February 2009 to May 2013, and served as a Director of Primoris from July 2008 to May 2013. He served as the chief financial officer of Primoris from February 2008 to February 2009. He also served as a director of Primoris and its predecessor entity from 1993 to July 2008. He joined Primoris’ wholly-owned subsidiary, ARB, Inc., in 1993, as senior vice president. Prior to joining ARB, Inc., he was senior vice president of Wedbush Morgan Securities. Mr. Schauerman served on the Boards of Directors of MYR Group (Nasdaq: MYRG), a leading electrical infrastructure firm, from March 2016 through November 2016, and has served on the Board of Wedbush Securities since August 2014. Mr. Schauerman received a B.S. in Electrical Engineering from UCLA and an M.B.A. from Columbia Business School.
We believe Mr. Schauerman is well-qualified to serve as a member of our board due to his public company experience, operational experience and contacts and his prior experience with Quartet Merger Corp. and Harmony merger Corp.
Adam J. Semler, age 55, has served as a director of Allegro since April 2018. Mr. Semler has served as a director of Legato since August 2020. Mr. Semler served as a member of Harmony Merger Corp.’s board of directors from July 2014 until its merger with NextDecade LLC. Mr. Semler joined York Capital Management, LLC, an investment management fund, in 1995 and held several positions with the firm, most recently holding the position of chief operating officer and member of its managing partner until he retired in December 2011. While at York Capital Management, he was responsible for all financial operations of the firm. During this time, he also served as chief financial officer and secretary of York Enhanced Strategies Fund, LLC, a closed ended mutual fund. Previously, he was at Granite Capital International Group, an investment management firm, where Mr. Semler was responsible for the accounting and operations function for its equity products. He also previously worked as a senior accountant at Goldstein, Golub, Kessler & Co., where Mr. Semler specialized in the financial services industry, as well as a senior accountant at Berenson, Berenson, Adler. Mr. Semler has also served on the Board of Hebrew Public, a not for profit charter school network, since May 2015. Mr. Semler is a C.P.A. and received a B.B.A. from Emory University.
We believe Mr. Semler is well-qualified to serve as a member of our board due to his financial and accounting expertise as well as his experience with Harmony.
Robert Michael Deluce, age 41, has served as a member of Allegro’s board of directors since April 2018. Mr. Deluce has a long history in aviation, both professionally and personally. In 2002, Mr. Deluce co-founded Porter Airlines, Inc., a regional airline headquartered at Billy Bishop Toronto City Airport on the Toronto Islands in Toronto, Ontario, Canada, and was instrumental in the strategic development of its business plan. Mr. Deluce continues to have a central role in defining Porter’s strategy and has direct responsibility for all commercial aspects of the business, including sales, marketing, revenue management, network planning and technology functions. Prior to joining Porter, Mr. Deluce was in Global Trading at Scotia Capital. Since May 2016, Mr. Deluce has served on the Board of Directors of UBS Bank Canada. He holds an MBA from University of Western Ontario’s Ivey School of Business.
We believe Mr. Deluce is well-qualified to serve as a member of our board due to his operational experience and contacts.
Number and Terms of Office of Officers and Directors
Our board of directors is divided into three classes with only one class of directors being elected in each year and each class (except for those directors appointed prior to our first annual meeting of stockholders) serving a three-year term. On May 14, 2020, Leonard B. Schlemm resigned from our board of directors. Mr. Schlemm’s resignation was not due to any disagreement with us on any matter relating to our operations, policies, or practices.
The term of office of the first class of directors, consisting of John Schauerman, will expire at our first annual meeting of stockholders. The term of office of the second class of directors, consisting of Robert Michael Deluce and Adam Semler, will expire at the second annual meeting of stockholders. The term of office of the third class of directors, consisting of David D. Sgro, will expire at the third annual meeting of stockholders.
Our executive officers are elected by the board of directors and serve at the discretion of the board of directors, rather than for specific terms of office. Our board of directors is authorized to appoint persons to the offices set forth in our bylaws as it deems appropriate. Our bylaws provide that our executive officers may consist of a Chief Executive Officer, President, Chief Financial Officer, Vice Presidents, Secretary, Assistant Secretaries, Treasurer, Controller and such other offices as may be determined by the board of directors.
Director Independence
We follow the rules of Nasdaq in determining if a director is independent. Nasdaq rules require that a majority of the board of directors of a company listed on Nasdaq must be composed of “independent directors.” An “independent director” is defined generally as a person other than an officer or employee of the company or its subsidiaries or any other individual having a relationship, which, in the opinion of the company’s board of directors, would interfere with the director’s exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director. We have determined that Messrs. Semler, Schauerman and Deluce are independent directors under the Nasdaq rules and Rule 10A-3 of the Exchange Act.
Committees of the Board of Directors
We have three standing committees: an audit committee, a nominating committee, and a compensation committee. Each such committee is composed of solely independent directors.
Audit Committee
Allegro’s audit committee of the board of directors currently consists of Adam Semler, John Schauerman and Robert Michael Deluce, each of whom is an independent director under the Nasdaq’s listing standards. The audit committee’s duties, which are specified in our Audit Committee Charter, include, but are not limited to:
● reviewing and discussing with management and the independent registered public accounting firm the annual audited financial statements, and recommend to the board whether the audited financial statements should be included in our Form 10-K;
● discussing with management and the independent registered public accounting firm significant financial reporting issues and judgments made in connection with the preparation of our financial statements;
● discussing with management major risk assessment and risk management policies;
● monitoring the independence of the independent registered public accounting firm;
● verifying the rotation of the lead (or coordinating) audit partner having primary responsibility for the audit and the audit partner responsible for reviewing the audit as required by law;
● reviewing and approving all related-party transactions;
● inquiring and discussing with management our compliance with applicable laws and regulations;
● pre-approving all audit services and permitted non-audit services to be performed by our independent registered public accounting firm, including the fees and terms of the services to be performed;
● appointing or replacing the independent registered public accounting firm;
● determining the compensation and oversight of the work of the independent registered public accounting firm (including resolution of disagreements between management and the independent registered public accounting firm regarding financial reporting) for the purpose of preparing or issuing an audit report or related work;
● establishing procedures for the receipt, retention and treatment of complaints received by us regarding accounting, internal accounting controls or reports which raise material issues regarding our financial statements or accounting policies; and
● approving reimbursement of expenses incurred by our management team in identifying potential target businesses.
During the fiscal years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, Allegro’s audit committee held four meetings, respectively in each year. Each of Allegro’s audit committee members attended all of the meetings of the audit committee in fiscal years 2019 and 2020.
Financial Expert on Audit Committee
The audit committee will at all times be composed exclusively of “independent directors” who are “financially literate” as defined under Nasdaq listing standards. Nasdaq listing standards define “financially literate” as being able to read and understand fundamental financial statements, including a company’s balance sheet, income statement and cash flow statement.
In addition, the board of directors has determined that Adam J. Semler qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert,” as defined under rules and regulations of the SEC.
Nominating Committee
Allegro’s nominating committee of the board of directors currently consists of John P. Schauerman and Adam J. Semler, each of whom is an independent director under Nasdaq’s listing standards. The nominating committee is responsible for overseeing the selection of persons to be nominated to serve on Allegro’s board of directors. The nominating committee considers persons identified by its members, management, stockholders, investment bankers and others.
Guidelines for Selecting Director Nominees
The guidelines for selecting nominees, which are specified in the Nominating Committee Charter, generally provide that the persons to be nominated:
● should have demonstrated notable or significant achievements in business, education or public service;
● should possess the requisite intelligence, education and experience to make a significant contribution to the board of directors and bring a range of skills, diverse perspectives and backgrounds to its deliberations; and
● should have the highest ethical standards, a strong sense of professionalism and intense dedication to serving the interests of the stockholders.
The Nominating Committee will consider a number of qualifications relating to management and leadership experience, background and integrity and professionalism in evaluating a person’s candidacy for membership on the board of directors. The nominating committee may require certain skills or attributes, such as financial or accounting experience, to meet specific board needs that arise from time to time and will also consider the overall experience and makeup of its members to obtain a broad and diverse mix of board members. The nominating committee does not distinguish among nominees recommended by stockholders and other persons.
During the fiscal years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, Allegro’s nominating committee did not hold any meetings.
Compensation Committee
Allegro’s compensation committee of the board of directors currently consists of Robert Michael Deluce, whom is an independent director under Nasdaq’s listing standards. The compensation committee’s duties, which are specified in our Compensation Committee Charter, include, but are not limited to:
● reviewing and approving on an annual basis the corporate goals and objectives relevant to our Chief Executive Officer’s compensation, evaluating our Chief Executive Officer’s performance in light of such goals and objectives and determining and approving the remuneration (if any) of our Chief Executive Officer’s based on such evaluation;
● reviewing and approving the compensation of all of our other executive officers;
● reviewing our executive compensation policies and plans;
● implementing and administering our incentive compensation equity-based remuneration plans;
● assisting management in complying with our proxy statement and annual report disclosure requirements;
● approving all special perquisites, special cash payments and other special compensation and benefit arrangements for our executive officers and employees;
● if required, producing a report on executive compensation to be included in our annual proxy statement; and
● reviewing, evaluating and recommending changes, if appropriate, to the remuneration for directors.
The charter also provides that the compensation committee may, in its sole discretion, retain or obtain the advice of a compensation consultant, legal counsel or other adviser and will be directly responsible for the appointment, compensation and oversight of the work of any such adviser. However, before engaging or receiving advice from a compensation consultant, external legal counsel or any other adviser, the compensation committee will consider the independence of each such adviser, including the factors required by Nasdaq and the SEC.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, as indicated below, other than the $12,500 per month administrative fee previously paid to Crescendo, which payments the Company and Crescendo agreed to suspend on March 31, 2020, no compensation of any kind, including finders, consulting or other similar fees, will be paid to any of our existing stockholders, including our directors, or any of their respective affiliates, prior to, or for any services they render in order to effectuate, the consummation of a business combination. Accordingly, it is likely that prior to the consummation of an initial business combination, the compensation committee will only be responsible for the review and recommendation of any compensation arrangements to be entered into in connection with such initial business combination.
During the fiscal years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, Allegro’s compensation committee did not hold any meetings.
Code of Ethics
On July 2, 2018, our board of directors adopted a code of ethics that applies to our executive officers, directors and employees. The code of ethics codifies the business and ethical principles that governs aspects of our business. We will provide, without charge, upon request, copies of our code of ethics. Requests for copies of our code of ethics should be sent in writing to Allegro Merger Corp., 777 Third Avenue, 37th Floor, New York, NY 10017.

---

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
None of our executive officers or directors has received any compensation (cash or non-cash) for services rendered to us. No compensation of any kind, including finder’s and consulting fees, will be paid to our initial stockholders, executive officers and directors, or any of their respective affiliates, for services rendered prior to or in connection with the consummation of an initial business combination other than (i) repayment of loans made to us prior to our initial public offering by our officers and directors to cover offering-relating and organization expenses and (ii) and payment to Crescendo, an entity controlled by Mr. Rosenfeld, of a fee of $12,500 per month from our inception through March 2020 for providing us with office space and certain office and administrative services. The Company and Crescendo agreed to suspend payment on this agreement on March, 31, 2020. Individuals will also be reimbursed for any out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with activities on our behalf such as identifying potential target businesses and performing due diligence on suitable business combinations. Our audit committee will approve all such reimbursements.
After the consummation of our initial business combination, directors or members of our management team who remain in one of those capacities may be paid director, consulting, management or other fees from the combined company with any and all amounts being fully disclosed to stockholders, to the extent then known, in the tender offer materials or proxy solicitation materials furnished to our stockholders in connection with a proposed business combination. It is unlikely the amount of such compensation will be known at the time, as it will be up to the directors of the post-combination business to determine executive and director compensation.
Any compensation to be paid to our officers will be determined, or recommended to the board of directors for determination, either by a compensation committee consisting solely of independent directors or by a majority of the independent directors on our board of directors.
We do not intend to take any action to ensure that members of our management team maintain their positions with us after the consummation of our initial business combination, although it is possible that some or all of our executive officers and directors may negotiate employment or consulting arrangements to remain with us after the initial business combination. The existence or terms of any such employment or consulting arrangements may influence our management’s motivation in identifying or selecting a target business although we do not believe that the ability of our management to remain with us after the consummation of an initial business combination will be a determining factor in our decision to proceed with any potential business combination. We are not party to any agreements with our executive officers and directors that provide for benefits upon termination of employment.

---

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
The following table sets forth information regarding the beneficial ownership of our shares of common stock as of March 29, 2021, by:
● each person known by us to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of our outstanding shares of common stock;
● each of our officers and directors; and
● all our officers and directors as a group.
Unless otherwise indicated, we believe that all persons named in the table have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of common stock beneficially owned by them. The percentage of beneficial ownership on the record date is calculated based on 4,110,000 outstanding shares of common stock as of March 29, 2021 but does not reflect beneficial ownership of any shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of rights or warrants as such securities are not exercisable or convertible within 60 days.
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner(1) Amount and
Nature of
Beneficial
Ownership %
Directors and Officers Prior to the Transactions:
Eric S. Rosenfeld 48,630 *
David D. Sgro (2) 2,859,263 69.57 %
Adam Jaffe 10,045 *
John P. Schauerman 30,000 *
Adam J. Semler (3) 30,000 *
Robert Michael Deluce 45,000
All directors and officers prior to the business combination as a group (6 persons) 3,022,938 73.55 %
Five Percent Holders:
Eric Rosenfeld 2017 Trust No. 1 1,553,687 37.8 %
Eric Rosenfeld 2017 Trust No. 2 684,563 16.6 %
Gregory Monahan 332,062 8.08 %
Leonard Schlemm 300,000 7.30 %
* Less than one percent.
(1) Unless otherwise indicated, the business address of each of the individuals is c/o Allegro Merger Corp., 777 Third Avenue, 37th Floor, New York, New York 10017.
(2) Represents 621,013 shares of common stock which are held individually by Mr. Sgro, 1,553,687 shares of common stock held by the Eric Rosenfeld 2017 Trust No. 1, and 684,563 shares of common stock held by Eric Rosenfeld 2017 Trust No. 2, both trusts established for Mr. Rosenfeld’s children. Mr. Sgro is the trustee of these trusts and has sole voting and dispositive power over the shares.
(3) Represents shares held by Triple J Holdings II, LLC, an entity managed by Mr. Semler. Mr. Semler has voting and dispositive control over such shares.
The private shares and private placement units, and securities contained therein, are each subject to transfer restrictions set forth in letter agreements among us, the initial stockholders and purchasers of private placement units. These transfer restrictions provide that such securities are not transferable or salable (A) in the case of the private shares, until the earlier of (1) one year after the completion of our initial business combination or (2) subsequent to our business combination, the last sale price of the common stock equals or exceeds $12.00 per share (as adjusted for stock splits, stock dividends, reorganizations, recapitalizations and the like) for any 20 trading days within any 30-trading day period commencing at least 150 days after our initial business combination, and (B) in the case of the private placement units, including the component securities therein, until 30 days after the consummation of our initial business combination; provided, however, that the transfer restrictions will lapse earlier if following the completion of our initial business combination we complete a liquidation, merger, stock exchange or other similar transaction that results in all of our stockholders having the right to exchange their shares of common stock for cash, securities or other property. During the lockup period, the only permitted transfers are (i) amongst our officers, directors and employees or those of Cantor and Chardan, (ii) to relatives and trusts for estate planning purposes, (iii) by virtue of the laws of descent and distribution upon death in the case of individuals or pursuant to applicable law or organizational documents upon dissolution in the case of entities, (iv) pursuant to a qualified domestic relations order, (v) by certain pledges to secure obligations incurred in connection with purchases of our securities, (vi) by private sales made at or prior to the consummation of a business combination at prices no greater than the price at which the shares were originally purchased or (vii) to us for no value for cancellation in connection with the consummation of our initial business combination, in each case (except for clause (vii) or with our prior consent) where the transferee agrees to the terms of the transfer restrictions and the letter agreement being signed by the transferor. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the letter agreements provide that, in connection with an initial business combination, the initial stockholders may transfer, assign or sell their private shares with our consent, including for a profit, to any person or entity that agrees in writing to be bound by the transfer restrictions set forth in the prior sentence, and any such transferee shall be a permitted transferee under the letter agreements.
Equity Compensation Plans
As of December 31, 2020, we had no compensation plans (including individual compensation arrangements) under which equity securities were authorized for issuance.

---

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
Private Shares
In connection with Allegro’s organization in August 2017, Allegro issued to Eric Rosenfeld, the Chief Executive Officer, an aggregate of 4,312,500 shares of common stock in exchange for a capital contribution of $25,000, or approximately $0.01 per share. The foregoing issuance was made pursuant to the exemption from registration contained in Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act. Mr. Rosenfeld then transferred all of the shares to two trusts for the benefit of his immediate family members, and subsequently, a portion of such shares was transferred to the other initial stockholders in exchange for $0.01 per share. In April 2018, the initial stockholders contributed to capital an aggregate of 575,000 shares for no additional consideration, leaving them with an aggregate of 3,737,500 shares of common stock.
The private shares are identical to the shares of common stock included in the units sold in the initial public offering. However, the initial stockholders have agreed (A) not to transfer, assign or sell any of their private until the earlier to occur of: (i) one year after the completion of Allegro’s initial business combination or (ii) the date on which Allegro completes a liquidation, merger, stock exchange or other similar transaction after the initial business combination that results in all stockholders having the right to exchange their shares of common stock for cash, securities or other property, or (iii) if the last sale price of our common stock equals or exceeds $12.00 per share (as adjusted for stock splits, stock dividends, reorganizations, recapitalizations and the like) for any 20 trading days within any 30-trading day period commencing at least 150 days after Allegro’s initial business combination, and (B) each holder of private shares has agreed to waive his, her or its redemption rights with respect to the private shares, (i) in connection with the consummation of a business combination, (ii) in connection with a stockholder vote to amend Allegro’s charter to modify the substance or timing of Allegro’s obligation to redeem 100% of the public shares if Allegro does not complete an initial business combination by the required deadline, (iii) if Allegro fails to consummate an initial business combination by the required deadline, and (iv) upon Allegro’s liquidation. Additionally, the initial stockholders have agreed to vote their private shares in favor of the initial business combination.
Promissory Notes
The Company issued two unsecured promissory notes totaling $30,000 to Eric S. Rosenfeld, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, in 2017. On February 5, 2018 the Company issued a $35,000 principal amount unsecured promissory note to Eric S. Rosenfeld. The notes were non-interest bearing. The notes were paid off in full on July 13, 2018.
The Company issued two unsecured promissory notes totaling $13,900 to Eric S. Rosenfeld, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, in July and November 2020. The notes are non-interest bearing, payable on demand and outstanding as of December 31, 2020.
The Company issued an unsecured promissory note totaling $5,000 to Mr. Rosenfeld in February 2021. The note is non-interest bearing and payable on demand.
Notes Payable- Relates Parties
The Contributors, who are individuals and entities that participated in the private placement of units that occurred simultaneously with the Company’s initial public offering, contributed to the Company an aggregate amount of $781,700, representing contributions covering a prorated amount of $0.02 per unconverted public share for the partial month of January 2020 and $0.025 per unconverted public share for each of February 2020 and March 2020. The Contributions will not bear any interest and will be repayable by the Company to the Contributors upon consummation of an initial business combination. The Contributions will be forgiven if the Company is unable to consummate an initial business combination except to the extent of any funds held outside of the Company’s trust account.
The Company deposited $223,342, the first contribution on January 6, 2020, into the trust account established in connection with the Company’s initial public offering. The Company deposited the second Contribution of $279,178 on January 31, 2020, and deposited the third Contribution of $279,180 on March 2, 2020, in each case, to the same trust account; provided that any such additional Contribution was only to be made if the previously announced merger agreement with TGI Fridays is still then in effect, or, if such agreement is earlier terminated, the Board of Directors of the Company by majority vote determines to require such additional Contribution.
On March 31, 2020, the Company and Holdings mutually determined, due to extraordinary market conditions and the failure to meet necessary closing conditions, to terminate the Merger Agreement.
An aggregate of approximately $781,700 principal amount of loans associated with the extension were outstanding as of December 31, 2020. The loans made by the Contributors will not be repaid and will be forgiven if we are unable to consummate a business combination and determine to liquidate and dissolve.
Administrative Service Fee
Allegro presently occupies office space provided by Crescendo, an entity controlled by Eric Rosenfeld. Crescendo has agreed that until Allegro consummates a business combination, it will make such office space, as well as general and administrative services including utilities and administrative support, available to Allegro as may be required by Allegro from time to time. Allegro agreed to pay an aggregate of $12,500 per month for such services commencing on the effective date of the initial public offering. The Company and Crescendo agreed to suspend payment on this agreement on March 31, 2020. The Company expensed and paid the affiliate $37,500 and $150,000 for such services for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively.
Private Placement Units
Simultaneous with the consummation of the Initial Public Offering, we consummated the private placement of an aggregate of 372,500 Private Units to our initial stockholders at a price of $10.00 per Private Unit, generating total proceeds of $3,725,000. This issuance was made pursuant to the exemption from registration contained in Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act.
Allegro’s initial stockholders, Cantor, and Chardan have the right to require Allegro to register the private placement units for resale, as described below under “-Registration Rights”. Allegro will bear the costs and expenses of filing any such registration statements.
The private placement rights are identical to the rights that were sold as part of the units in Allegro’s initial public offering. The private placement warrants are non-redeemable so long as they are held by the initial stockholders or their permitted transferees. The private placement warrants may also be exercised by the initial stockholders or their permitted transferees, for cash or on a cashless basis. Other than as stated above, the private placement warrants have terms and provisions that are identical to those of the warrants sold as part of the units in Allegro’s initial public offering. The private placement units are not transferrable until 30 days after the consummation of Allegro’s initial business combination; provided, however, that the transfer restrictions will lapse earlier if following the completion of Allegro’s initial business combination Allegro completes a liquidation, merger, stock exchange or other similar transaction that results in all of Allegro’s stockholders having the right to exchange their shares of common stock for cash, securities or other property.
Working Capital Loans
In order to finance transaction costs in connection with an intended initial business combination and working capital expenses, Allegro’s initial stockholders, officers, directors or their affiliates may, but are not obligated to, loan to Allegro funds as may be required. In the event that the initial business combination does not close, Allegro may use a portion of the working capital held outside the trust account to repay such loaned amounts, but no proceeds from the trust account would be used for such repayment. Such loans would be evidenced by promissory notes. The notes would either be paid upon consummation of Allegro’s initial business combination, without interest, or, at the lender’s discretion, up to $1,000,000 of the notes may be converted upon consummation of Allegro’s business combination into additional private placement units at a price of $10.00 per unit.
Registration Rights
The holders of the Founder Shares, Private Shares, Private Warrants, Private Rights, and any shares, warrants and rights that may be issued upon conversion of working capital loans (and any shares issued upon the exercise of such warrants or conversion of such rights) will be entitled to registration rights pursuant to a registration rights agreement executed prior to the Initial Public Offering. The holders of the majority of these securities are entitled to make up to three demands, excluding short form demands, that the Company register such securities, except that Cantor, Chardan, and/or their designees may only make a demand registration (i) on one occasion and (ii) during the five year period beginning on July 2, 2018, the effective date of Allegro’s registration statement in connection with Allegro’s initial public offering.. In addition, the holders have certain “piggy-back” registration rights with respect to registration statements filed subsequent to our consummation of an initial Business Combination. Cantor, Chardan, and/or their designees may participate in a “piggy-back” registration only during the seven year period beginning on July 2, 2018. Allegro will bear the costs and expenses of filing any such registration statements. The Company will bear the costs and expenses of filing any such registration statements.
Related Party Policy
Our Code of Ethics, which we adopted upon consummation of our initial public offering, requires us to avoid, wherever possible, all related party transactions that could result in actual or potential conflicts of interests, except under guidelines approved by the board of directors (or the audit committee). Related-party transactions are defined as transactions in which (1) the aggregate amount involved will or may be expected to exceed $120,000 in any calendar year, (2) we or any of our subsidiaries is a participant, and (3) any (a) executive officer, director or nominee for election as a director, (b) greater than 5% beneficial owner of our shares of common stock, or (c) immediate family member, of the persons referred to in clauses (a) and (b), has or will have a direct or indirect material interest (other than solely as a result of being a director or a less than 10% beneficial owner of another entity). A conflict of interest situation can arise when a person takes actions or has interests that may make it difficult to perform his or her work objectively and effectively. Conflicts of interest may also arise if a person, or a member of his or her family, receives improper personal benefits as a result of his or her position.
We also require each of our directors and executive officers to annually complete a directors’ and officers’ questionnaire that elicits information about related party transactions.
Our audit committee, pursuant to its written charter, is responsible for reviewing and approving related-party transactions to the extent we enter into such transactions. All ongoing and future transactions between us and any of our officers and directors or their respective affiliates will be on terms believed by us to be no less favorable to us than are available from unaffiliated third parties. Such transactions will require prior approval by our audit committee and a majority of our uninterested “independent” directors, or the members of our board who do not have an interest in the transaction, in either case who had access, at our expense, to our attorneys or independent legal counsel. We will not enter into any such transaction unless our audit committee and a majority of our disinterested “independent” directors determine that the terms of such transaction are no less favorable to us than those that would be available to us with respect to such a transaction from unaffiliated third parties. Additionally, we require each of our directors and executive officers to complete a directors’ and officers’ questionnaire that elicits information about related party transactions.
These procedures are intended to determine whether any such related party transaction impairs the independence of a director or presents a conflict of interest on the part of a director, employee or officer.
To further minimize potential conflicts of interest, we have agreed not to consummate a business combination with an entity which is affiliated with any of our initial stockholders unless we obtain an opinion from an independent investment banking firm, another independent firm that commonly renders valuation opinions on the type of target business we are seeking to acquire, or an independent accounting firm, and that is reasonably acceptable to Cantor, that the business combination is fair to our unaffiliated stockholders from a financial point of view. Furthermore, in no event will any of our existing officers, directors, special advisors or initial stockholders, or any entity with which they are affiliated, be paid any finder’s fee, consulting fee or other compensation prior to, or for any services they render in order to effectuate, the consummation of a business combination.

---

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES.
During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020, the firm of MaloneBailey, LP acted as our independent registered public accounting firm. During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019, the firm of WithumSmith+Brown, PC acted as our independent registered public accounting firm. The following is a summary of fees paid to MaloneBailey, LP and WithumSmith+Brown, PC for services rendered.
Audit Fees
During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020, audit fees paid to MaloneBailey, LP were $12,150. During the fiscal years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, audit fees paid to WithumSmith+Brown, PC were $20,200 and $40,500, respectively.
Audit-Related Fees
During the fiscal years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, we did not pay MaloneBailey, LP or WithumSmith+Brown, PC any audit-related fees.
Tax Fees
During the fiscal years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, fees for tax services paid to WithumSmith+Brown, PC were $3,500 and $3,000, respectively.
All Other Fees
During the fiscal years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, we did not pay MaloneBailey, LP or WithumSmith+Brown, PC any other fees.
Audit Committee Approval
All of the services discussed above were pre-approved by our audit committee.

---

ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
(a) The following Exhibits are filed as part of this annual report.
Exhibit No.
Description
3.1
Certificate of Incorporation (incorporated by reference to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (No. 333-225270) filed on May 29, 2018).
3.2
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation (incorporated by reference to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (No. 333-225270) filed on June 21, 2018).
3.3
Bylaws (incorporated by reference to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (No. 333-225270) filed on May 29, 2018).
4.2
Specimen Common Stock Certificate (incorporated by reference to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (No. 333-225270) filed on June 21, 2018).
4.3
Specimen Warrant Certificate (incorporated by reference to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (No. 333-225270) filed on June 21, 2018).
4.4
Warrant Agreement between Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company and the Registrant (incorporated by reference to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on July 3, 2018).
4.5
Specimen Right Certificate (incorporated by reference to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (No. 333-225270) filed on June 21, 2018).
4.6
Rights Agreement between Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company and the Registrant (incorporated by reference to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on July 3, 2018).
10.1
Form of Letter Agreement among the Registrant, Cantor Fitzgerald & Co. and the Company’s officers, directors and stockholders (incorporated by reference to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (No. 333-225270) filed on June 21, 2018).
10.3
Registration Rights Agreement among the Registrant and the Initial Stockholders (incorporated by reference to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on July 3, 2018).
10.4
Form of Subscription Agreement among the Registrant and the Initial Stockholders (incorporated by reference to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (No. 333-225270) filed on June 21, 2018).
10.5
Form of Subscription Agreement among the Registrant, Cantor Fitzgerald & Co., and Chardan Capital Markets (incorporated by reference to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (No. 333-225270) filed on June 21, 2018).
10.6
Form of Administrative Services Agreement between Crescendo Advisors II, LLC and the Registrant (incorporated by reference to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (No. 333-225270) filed on June 21, 2018).
10.7
Form of Letter Agreement between the Registrant and each of the Registrant’s officers and directors (incorporated by reference to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (No. 333-225270) filed on June 21, 2018).
Code of Ethics (incorporated by reference to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (No. 333-225270) filed on June 21, 2018).
List of Subsidiaries (filed herewith).
23.1
Consent of WithumSmith+Brown, PC (filed herewith).
31.1
Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith).
31.2
Certification of Principal Financial and Accounting Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith).
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith).
101.INS
XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema
101.CAL
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase
101.DEF
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase
101.LAB
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase
101.PRE
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase