EDGAR 10-K Filing

Company CIK: 1607962
Filing Year: 2025
Filename: 1607962_10-K_2025_0001178913-25-000736.json

---

ITEM 1. BUSINESS
ITEM 1 . BUSINESS
Overview
We are a medical device company that designs, develops, and commercializes life-changing solutions that span the continuum of care in physical rehabilitation and recovery, delivering proven functional and health benefits in clinical settings as well as in the home and community. Our initial product offerings were the ReWalk Personal and ReWalk Rehabilitation Exoskeleton devices for individuals with spinal cord injury (“SCI Products”). These devices are robotic exoskeletons that are designed for individuals with paraplegia that use our patented tilt-sensor technology and an onboard computer and motion sensors to drive motorized legs that power movement. These SCI Products allow individuals with spinal cord injury (“SCI”) the ability to stand and walk again during everyday activities at home or in the community. In March 2023, we received clearance of our premarket notification (“510(k)”) from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) for the ReWalk Personal Exoskeleton with stair and curb functionality, which adds usage on stairs and curbs to the indication for use for the device in the U.S. The clearance permits U.S. customers to participate in more walking activities in real-world environments in their daily lives where stairs or curbs may have previously limited them when using the exoskeleton for its intended, FDA-indicated uses. This feature has been available in Europe since initial CE Clearance, and real-world data from a cohort of 47 European users throughout a period of over seven years consisting of over 18,000 stair steps was collected to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of this feature and support the FDA submission. In June 2024, we submitted to the FDA a 510(k) premarket notification for ReWalk 7 Personal Exoskeleton device, a next-generation ReWalk model, and such 510(k) is pending FDA review.
We have sought to expand our product offerings beyond the SCI Products through internal development, distribution agreements, and acquisitions. We have developed our ReStore Exo-Suit device, which we began commercializing in June 2019 (we ceased sales in the EU in May 2024). The ReStore is a powered, lightweight soft exo-suit intended for use during the rehabilitation of individuals with lower limb disabilities due to stroke. In the second quarter of 2020, we finalized and moved to implement two separate agreements to distribute additional product lines in the United States, one of which we later discontinued. We are the exclusive distributor of the MYOLYN MyoCycle FES Pro cycles to U.S. rehabilitation clinics and for the MyoCycle Home cycles available to U.S. veterans through the Veterans Health Administration (“VHA”) hospitals.
In August 2023, we made our first acquisition to supplement our internal growth when we acquired AlterG, a leading provider of Anti-Gravity systems for use in physical and neurological rehabilitation. We paid a cash purchase price of approximately $19 million at closing and additional cash earnout payments may be paid based upon a percentage of AlterG’s revenue growth over the two years following the closing. The AlterG Anti-Gravity systems use patented, National Aeronautics and Space Administration (“NASA”) derived differential air pressure (“DAP”) technology to reduce the effects of gravity and allow patients to rehabilitate with finely calibrated support and reduced pain. AlterG Anti-Gravity systems are utilized in over 4,000 facilities globally in more than 40 countries. We will continue to evaluate other products for distribution or acquisition that can broaden our product offerings further to help individuals with neurological injury and disability.
In March 2025, we announced an agreement to increase our penetration of SCI Products into the workers’ compensation market in which CorLife, LLC., a Delaware limited liability company (“CorLife”) and a division of Numotion, the nation’s leading and largest provider of products and services that provide mobility, health and personal independence. Pursuant to the agreement, CorLife became the exclusive distributor for the ReWalk Personal Exoskeleton for individuals with workers’ compensation claims. The agreement leverages CorLife’s extensive network of credentialed providers and experts to include the ReWalk Personal Exoskeleton among the services and equipment they provide to thousands of injured workers each year. Under the agreement, the CorLife reimbursement team manages all workers’ compensation claims submissions for the ReWalk Personal Exoskeleton. We believe this agreement will build awareness of the benefits of the ReWalk Personal Exoskeleton among individuals with workers’ compensation coverage and gain us access to the resources of CorLife to facilitate efficient processing of claims.
We are in the research stage of ReBoot, a personal soft exo-suit for home and community use by individuals post-stroke, and we are currently evaluating the reimbursement landscape and the potential clinical impact of this device. This product would be a complementary product to ReStore as it provides active assistance to the ankle during plantar flexion and dorsiflexion for gait and mobility improvement in the home environment, and it received Breakthrough Device Designation from the FDA in November 2021. Further investment in the development path of the ReBoot was paused in 2023 pending determination regarding the clinical and commercial opportunity of this device and at this time it remains on hold.
Our principal markets are primarily in the United States and Europe with some lesser sales in Asia, the Middle East and South America. We sell our products primarily directly in the United States, through a combination of direct sales and distributors (depending on the product line) in Germany and Canada, and primarily through distributors in other markets. In markets where we sell direct to consumers, we have established relationships with clinics and rehabilitation centers, professional and college sports teams, and individuals and organizations in the SCI community, and in markets where we do not sell direct to consumers, our distributors maintain these relationships. We have primary offices in Yokneam, Israel, Marlborough, Massachusetts, and Berlin, Germany. We also had offices in Fremont, California and Queens, New York where we ceased operations as of December 31, 2024.
We have in the past generated and expect to generate in the future revenue from a combination of clinics and rehabilitation centers, commercial distributors, third-party payors (including private and government payors), professional and college sports teams, and self-pay individuals. While a broad uniform policy of coverage and reimbursement by third-party commercial payors currently does not exist in the United States for exoskeleton technologies such as the ReWalk Personal Exoskeleton, we are pursuing various paths of reimbursement and support fundraising efforts by institutions and clinics, such as the VHA policy that was issued in December 2015 for the evaluation, training, and procurement of ReWalk Personal Exoskeleton systems for all qualifying veterans living with SCI across the United States.
We have also been pursuing updates with the CMS to clarify the Medicare coverage category (i.e., benefit category) applicable for personal exoskeletons. In 2022, the National Spinal Cord Injury Statistical Center (“NSCISC”), which maintains the world’s largest database on spinal cord injury research, reported that CMS is the primary payor for approximately 57% of the SCI population which are at least five years post their injury date, with Medicare representing a majority of this percentage. In July 2020, following a successful submission and hearing process, a code was issued for ReWalk Personal Exoskeleton, which may be used for purposes of claim submission to Medicare, Medicaid, and other payors.
On November 1, 2023, CMS released the Calendar Year 2024 Home Health Prospective Payment System Final Rule, CMS-1780-F (“Final Rule”), which was adopted through the notice and comment rulemaking process. The Final Rule includes a policy confirming that personal exoskeletons are included in the Medicare brace benefit category, as of January 1, 2024. Medicare personal exoskeleton claims with dates of service on or after January 1, 2024 that are billed using HCPCS code K1007 are assigned to the brace benefit category. CMS reimburses items classified under the brace benefit category using a lump sum payment methodology.
On April 11, 2024, CMS revised its April 2024 Durable Medical Equipment, Prosthetics, Orthotics, and Supplies (“DMEPOS”) Fee Schedule to include a final lump-sum Medicare purchase fee schedule amount for personal exoskeletons (HCPCS code K1007) with an established rate of $91,032. The final payment determination was made by CMS by applying a “gap filling” process, which was used in light of CMS determining that the code describing the technology has no fee schedule pricing history and that lower extremity exoskeletons incorporate “revolutionary features” that cannot be described by or considered comparable to any other existing code or combination of codes. As part of gap-filling, CMS utilizes verifiable supplier or commercial pricing information and adjusts this pricing information according to a deflation and update factor methodology. In applying this formula to the K1007 code describing the ReWalk Personal Exoskeleton, CMS says that it calculated this final payment amount by averaging pricing information for exoskeleton devices from Lifeward and other manufacturers.
In Germany, we continue to make progress toward achieving coverage from the various government, private and worker’s compensation payors for our SCI products. In September 2017, each of German insurer BARMER GEK (“BARMER”) and national social accident insurance provider Deutsche Gesetzliche Unfallversicherung (“DGUV”) indicated that they will provide coverage to users who meet certain inclusion and exclusion criteria. In February 2018, the head office of German Statutory Health Insurance (“SHI”) Spitzenverband (“GKV”) confirmed its decision to list the ReWalk Personal Exoskeleton system in the German Medical Device Directory. This decision means that ReWalk is listed among all medical devices for compensation, which SHI providers can procure for any approved beneficiary on a case-by-case basis. During the year 2020 and 2021, we announced several new agreements with German SHIs, including TK and DAK Gesundheit, as well as the first German Private Health Insurer (“PHI”), which outline the process of obtaining our devices for eligible insured patients. In February 2025, we finalized an agreement with BARMER to formalize the reimbursement process for the provision of ReWalk exoskeletons to medically eligible beneficiaries. We are also currently working with several additional SHIs on securing a formal operating contract that will establish the process of obtaining a ReWalk Personal Exoskeleton for their beneficiaries within their system. Additionally, to date, several private insurers in the United States and Europe are providing reimbursement for ReWalk in certain cases.
ReWalk Personal Exoskeleton and ReWalk Rehabilitation Exoskeleton
Development of our SCI Products took over a decade and was spurred by the experiences of our founder, Dr. Amit Goffer, who became a quadriplegic due to an accident. Current ReWalk designs are intended for people with paraplegia, an SCI resulting in complete or incomplete paralysis of the legs, who have the use of their upper bodies and arms. We currently offer two products in this category: the ReWalk Personal Exoskeleton and the ReWalk Rehabilitation Exoskeleton. The ReWalk Rehabilitation Exoskeleton is substantially similar to the ReWalk Personal Exoskeleton system except that it is sold with multiple sizes of our adjustable parts to allow different users the ability to train within a clinic. In recent years, substantially all the ReWalk units sold by the Company have been ReWalk Personal systems and we expect our commercial efforts to continue to focus on this model.
The ReWalk Personal Exoskeleton is a novel product that seeks to fundamentally change the health and life experiences of users. Designed for daily use, the device is battery-powered and consists of a wearable exoskeleton with integrated motors at the joints, an array of sensors and a computer-based control system to power knee and hip movement. The user controls the device movement using a combination of user inputs on the wrist-worn controller, as well as through subtle weight shifts of the upper body. Because the exoskeleton supports its own weight and facilitates the user’s gait, users do not expend unnecessary energy while walking. The ReWalk Personal Exoskeleton also allows users to sit, stand and climb and descend stairs and curbs. In March 2023, the FDA cleared the ReWalk Personal Exoskeleton for use on stairs and curbs, allowing users to participate in walking activities in more real-world environments in their daily lives and experience more opportunities to enjoy the health benefits of walking.
● ReWalk Personal Exoskeleton: intended for everyday use at home, at work or in the community with a trained companion. We began marketing ReWalk Personal Exoskeleton in Europe with CE mark clearance at the end of 2012. We received FDA de novo authorization to market the ReWalk Personal Exoskeleton in the United States in June 2014. FDA subsequently cleared 510(k) premarket notifications for modifications to the ReWalk, including for use of the ReWalk on curbs and stairs. ReWalk Personal Exoskeleton units are all manufactured according to the same mechanical specifications. Each unit is then permanently sized to fit the individual user and the software is configured for the user’s specifications by the rehabilitation center, clinic, or distributor. We are currently offering our 6th generation device, and in June 2024 we submitted a premarket notification to FDA for our 7th generation ReWalk design. The submission is currently pending FDA review.
● ReWalk Rehabilitation Exoskeleton: the current offering for clinics who wish to implement exoskeleton training is composed of our ReWalk Personal Exoskeleton unit along with multiple sizing of different parts, enabling multiple patient use. The ReWalk Rehabilitation Exoskeleton provides a valuable means of exercise, training, and therapy. Use of the ReWalk Rehabilitation Exoskeleton in the clinic also enables individuals to evaluate their capacity for using the ReWalk Personal Exoskeleton in the future.
ReWalk Personal Exoskeleton
Additionally, we have received regulatory approval to sell the ReWalk Personal Exoskeleton device in other countries. In the future we intend to seek approval from the applicable regulatory agencies in other jurisdictions where we may seek to market ReWalk Personal Exoskeleton. For more information about the safety of using our SCI products see “Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors-Risks Related to our Business and our Industry- Defects in our products or the software that drives them could adversely affect the results of our operations.”
Overview of Spinal Cord Injury
Spinal Cord Injury
The spine is the central core of the human skeleton and provides structural support, alignment, and flexibility to the body. The spinal cord, housed inside the bones of the spinal column, is a complex bundle of nerves serving as the main pathway for information connecting the brain, and nervous system. Spinal cord injury is a serious medical condition that occurs as a result of physical damage to the nerves of the spinal cord, resulting in a loss of function, such as mobility or feeling. In most people who have spinal cord injury, the spinal cord is intact. Spinal cord injury is not the same as back injury, which may result from pinched nerves or ruptured disks. Even when a person sustains a break in a vertebra or vertebrae, there may not be any spinal cord injury if the spinal cord itself is not affected. There are two types of spinal cord injury - complete and incomplete. In a complete injury, a person loses all ability to feel and voluntarily move below the level of the injury. In an incomplete injury, there is some functioning below the level of the injury.
Upon medical examination, a patient is assigned a level of injury depending on the location of the spinal cord injury. Cervical level injuries cause paralysis or weakness in both arms and legs and is referred to as quadriplegia. Sometimes this type of injury is accompanied by loss of physical sensation, respiratory issues, bowel, bladder, and sexual dysfunction. Thoracic level injuries can cause paralysis or weakness of the legs (paraplegia) along with loss of physical sensation, bowel, bladder, and sexual dysfunction. In most cases, arms and hands are not affected. Lumbar level injuries result in paralysis or weakness of the legs (paraplegia). Loss of physical sensation, bowel, bladder, and sexual dysfunction can occur. The shoulder, arm, and hand functions are usually unaffected. Sacral level injuries primarily cause loss of bowel and bladder function as well as sexual dysfunction.
Clinical Evidence
Published clinical studies indicate the ReWalk Personal Exoskeleton’s ability to deliver a functional walking speed. In addition, certain potential secondary health benefits have been reported in literature as well as by healthcare practitioners and ReWalk users, including study participants. Although these benefits have not been established as conclusive clinical data in randomized controlled trials, these reported secondary health benefits include:
● reduced pain;
● improved bowel and urinary tract function;
● reduced spasticity;
● increases in joint range of motion for the hip and ankle joints;
● improved sleep and reduced fatigue;
● improved mental health and quality of life;
● increase in oxygen uptake and heart rate as a result of walking as opposed to sitting and standing;
● ability to ambulate at a speed greater than 0.4 meters per second, which is considered to be conducive to outdoor related community ambulation; and
● reduced hospitalizations.
We believe that using our SCI Products may have the ability to reduce the lifetime healthcare costs of individuals with spinal cord injuries, which we believe will make our SCI Products economically attractive for individuals and third-party payors. While we believe that using our SCI Products could potentially offer significant advantages over competing technologies and therapies, disadvantages include the time it takes for a user to put on the device, the slower pace of the device compared to a wheelchair, the training required by the user and companion to use the device, the weight of the device when carried, which makes it more burdensome for a companion to transport than a wheelchair, and the requirement that users be accompanied by a trained companion.
Market Opportunity
Current and near-term market opportunities include providing a solution for persons with SCI that can be used in the clinic and/or home settings. For persons with SCI, reduced physical activity and the predominance of seated activities can lead to severe physical and psychological deterioration, resulting in bad health, poor quality of life, low self-esteem, and high medical expenses. In addition, the secondary medical consequences of paralysis can include difficulty with bowel and urinary tract function, osteoporosis, loss of lean mass, gain in fat mass, insulin resistance, diabetes, and heart disease. The cost of treating these conditions is substantial. The NSCISC estimates that complications related to paraplegia cost approximately $670,000 in the first-year post-injury, excluding indirect costs such as loss in wages, fringe benefits, and productivity, and significant additional amounts over the course of an individual’s lifetime. Further, secondary complications related to spinal cord injury can reduce life expectancies for SCI patients. The young average age at time of injury and significant remaining life expectancy, the likelihood of living at home, and the lifetime cost of treatment highlight the need for an out-of-hospital solution with demonstrated health and social benefits.
The NSCISC estimates according to its 2024 SCI Fact Sheet that there are 305,000 people in the United States living with SCI, with an annual incidence of approximately 18,000 new cases per year. According to the VHA data there are approximately 42,000 of such patients who are veterans and are eligible for medical care and other benefits from the VHA, out of which the VHA states that 27,000 veterans are receiving SCI treatment annually. With 25 VHA spinal cord injury centers designated SCI/D Hub locations, the VHA has the largest single network of spinal cord injury care in the United States.
According to the NSCISC, since 2015 motor vehicle crashes have been the leading cause of reported spinal cord injury cases (38%), followed by falls (32%), acts of violence (15%) and sports injuries (8%). Approximately 79% of spinal cord injuries occur among the male population. According to NSCISC data, upon hospital discharge, 87% of persons with spinal cord injuries are sent to private, non-institutional residence (in most cases, their homes prior to injury).
Based on information from the 2023 annual report published by the NSCISC, 40% of the total U.S. population of SCI patients suffered injuries between levels T4 and L5. Four published ReWalk trials for SCI patients had an aggregate screening acceptance rate of 50% considering all current FDA limitations, resulting in an estimated 20% of the total population of SCI patients can be considered as candidates for current ReWalk Personal Exoskeleton or ReWalk Rehabilitation Exoskeleton according to the device instructions for use. For important qualifying information about this determination, see “Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors-Risks Related to our Business and our Industry-The market for medical exoskeletons, including soft exo-suit devices, remains relatively new and unproven, and important assumptions about the potential market for our current and future products may be inaccurate.”
Third-Party Reimbursements
United States
In the U.S., individuals typically obtain a ReWalk Personal Exoskeleton for home use through third-party medical coverage. For an individual who suffered an SCI through a work-related incident, workers’ compensation insurance can be a source of funding to purchase the device. Similarly, for U.S. veterans, an individual may be covered by the VHA for the purchase of the device regardless of whether the SCI occurred during active military service.
In December 2015, the VHA issued a national policy or standard operating procedure (“SOP”) for the evaluation, training, and procurement of ReWalk Personal Exoskeleton systems for all qualifying veterans across the United States and U.S. Territories. The VHA SOP is the first national coverage policy in the United States for qualifying individuals who are living with spinal cord injury. In June 2018, the VHA updated the SOP, in part, to expand training options for individuals who could not complete the mandatory training due to excessive distance/drive times from a VHA-designated site. As of December 31, 2024, we had placed 49 units as part of the VHA policy. The VHA accounted for 4.5% of our total revenue for the year ended December 31, 2024.
We continue to work with the VHA to both accelerate the pace of implementation of the current VHA policy nationally, and to again expand opportunities for veterans to gain access to assessments, training, and devices in facilities outside VHA’s traditional spinal cord injury “hub and spoke” infrastructure. Community-based, non-VHA clinics are also being leveraged to allow veterans to be trained closer to their homes, while still being reimbursed by the VHA as part of the VHA’s Community Care Network program.
Successful commercialization depends in significant part on adequate coverage and reimbursement from third party payors, which may include government payors (such as Medicare and Medicaid programs in the United States), managed care organizations, and private health insurers. In general, each third-party payor decides which devices will be covered and reimbursed, establishes reimbursement and co-pay levels and sets conditions for coverage and reimbursement.
While no broad uniform policy of coverage and reimbursement for electronic exoskeleton medical technology exists among commercial insurance payors in the United States, reimbursement may be evaluated by the payor on a case-by-case basis. To date, payments for the ReWalk Personal Exoskeleton have been made primarily through case-by-case determinations by third-party payors, including commercial insurers in the United States, by self-payors and donations and, to a lesser extent, through the use of funds from insurance and/or accident settlements.
According to the NSCISC 2023 annual report, approximately 57% of the spinal cord injury population received primary coverage from Medicare and Medicaid within five years after their injury date, with Medicare representing the majority of cases.
In order to be covered and reimbursed by Medicare, the ReWalk Personal Exoskeleton must, among other things, be classified into an applicable Medicare benefit category. In addition, appropriate codes describing the technology must also be established to facilitate billing and claims processing.
In December 2019, we submitted the first application for a unique code to describe the ReWalk Personal Exoskeleton and, in July 2020, a unique code was issued for ReWalk Personal Exoskeleton. On April 11, 2024, CMS revised its April 2024 DMEPOS Fee Schedule to include a final lump-sum Medicare purchase fee schedule amount for personal exoskeletons (HCPCS code K1007) with an established rate of $91,032. The final payment determination was made by CMS by applying a “gap filling” process, which was used in light of CMS determining that the code describing the technology has no fee schedule pricing history and that lower extremity exoskeletons incorporate “revolutionary features” that cannot be described by or considered comparable to any other existing code or combination of codes. As part of gap-filling, CMS utilizes verifiable supplier or commercial pricing information and adjusts this pricing information according to a deflation and update factor methodology. In applying this formula to the K1007 code describing the ReWalk Personal Exoskeleton, CMS says that it calculated this final payment amount by averaging pricing information for exoskeleton devices from Lifeward and other manufacturers.
For more information about coverage and reimbursement risk factors, see “Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors-Risks Related to our Business and our Industry.”
As part of our plan for growth, we intend to continue working with both national and regional commercial insurance companies, health care practitioners, physicians, researchers, and the SCI community to support efforts to demonstrate the benefits of our SCI Products. In addition, we plan to pursue potential coverage policies with third party payors based on supportive data and appeal rulings that have deemed exoskeleton devices medically necessary and not investigational for individuals with SCI. Our efforts in the future will be focused on continued education of third-party payors through data application, published clinical literature, and work with advocacy groups and health and care providers. In addition, we will continue ongoing communication to seek greater clarity regarding Medicare coverage and reimbursement standards applicable to the ReWalk Personal Exoskeleton.
Europe
Reimbursement for ReWalk in Europe varies by country and historically certain third-party payors have provided reimbursement for our products in certain cases in Germany and Italy.
We initially focused our European efforts in Germany where we continue to make progress toward achieving ReWalk coverage from the various government, private, and workers’ compensation payors. Specifically:
● In September 2017, the German insurer BARMER confirmed it will provide ReWalk systems to all qualifying beneficiaries. BARMER provides coverage for nearly nine million people in Germany, as a member of the SHI network and one of the most significant national insurers in the country. Exoskeletons are provided to users that meet certain inclusion criteria and assessment by the German Health Insurance Medical Service (Medizinischer Dienst der Krankenversicherungen) before and after training.
● In September 2017 Germany’s national social accident insurance provider, DGUV, indicated that the DGUV’s member payors, including the health insurance association Berufsgenossenschaft (also known as BG) and state insurers, will approve the supply of exoskeleton systems for qualifying beneficiaries on a case-by-case basis. DGUV is comprised of 33 different insurers, which provide coverage for more than 80 million individuals in Germany. Per the agreement, eligible individuals go to BG clinics for evaluation as a part of the procurement. In May 2020 the DGUV agreed to a binding offer to the evaluation, training, and supply of the ReWalk Personal Exoskeleton to qualified individuals.
● In February 2018, the GKV-Spitzenverband (Central Federal Association of (the) Statutory Health Insurance Funds) confirmed its decision to list the ReWalk Personal Exoskeleton system in the German MDD, a comprehensive list of all medical devices which are principally and regularly reimbursed by German SHI and PHI providers. The ReWalk Personal was added to the official German list of medical aids, code number 23.29.01.2001, in June 2018. This decision means that ReWalk Personal Exoskeleton is listed among all medical devices for compensation, which SHI providers can procure for any approved beneficiary on a case-by-case basis.
● During the year 2020 we announced several new agreements with SHIs such as TK and DAK-Gesundheit and others as well as the first PHI that chose to enter into an agreement with us that outline the process to obtaining a device for eligible insured patients.
● In March 2021 we entered into a contract with BKK Mobile Oil health insurance to supply ReWalk’s Personal Exoskeleton to eligible persons in Germany.
● In June 2020, BARMER appealed the decision of the State Social Court, which ordered the supply of the SHI’s insured SCI person with ReWalk. The State Social Court ruled and deemed ReWalk as the medical aid which will directly compensate the plaintiff’s disability. BARMER initially appealed this ruling with the Federal Social Court (Bundessozialgericht), but later, in November 2022, withdrew its pending case and accepted the prior ruling from the state court that exoskeletons are considered as a direct disability compensation. This outcome means that an eligible insured person with SCI in Germany has a legal basis for the supply of an exoskeleton as an orthopedic aid for direct disability compensation. Patients in Germany who are covered under these contracts and policies must be medically evaluated for their eligibility to use the ReWalk Personal Exoskeleton device. If medically qualified, the patient, along with his or her physician, must apply for coverage of the device. If a patient is found eligible and medically fit to use our ReWalk Personal Exoskeleton device, we first enter into a rental agreement which allows the patient the necessary period to train on how to use the device which usually takes between 3 to 6 months and then, after approval from the insurer, the patient receives a personal device to use at home and in the community.
● In February 2025, we finalized an agreement with BARMER to formalize the reimbursement process for the provision of ReWalk exoskeletons to medically eligible beneficiaries. With the completion of the BARMER contract, approximately 45% of the 70 million people in Germany covered by Statutory Health Insurance now have coverage policies with a defined reimbursement process for personal exoskeletons. We are currently working with several additional SHIs and PHIs on securing a formal operating contract that will establish the process of obtaining a ReWalk Personal Exoskeleton for their beneficiaries within their system.
As of December 31, 2024, there were 44 insurance cases pending in Germany. We believe that our recent coverage decisions and the existing claims will eventually lead other German insurers to provide coverage on a broader scale, but this is not guaranteed. For more information, see “Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors-Risks Related to our Business and our Industry- We may fail to secure or maintain adequate insurance coverage or reimbursement for our products by third-party payors which risk may be heightened if insurers find the products to be investigational or experimental or if new government regulations change existing reimbursement policies. Additionally, such coverage or reimbursement, even if maintained, may not produce revenue that is high enough to allow us to sell our products profitably.”
We continue to support clinical research and academic publications, which we believe will further support the case for coverage.
We have distribution agreements in several European countries where we also had success with reimbursement by private insurers and worker’s compensation. One of the examples was achieved in March 2018, when the Italian Ministry of Labor and Social Policy’s statutory insurance corporation put in place a coverage policy that will provide exoskeleton systems for all qualifying beneficiaries. This policy, the first of its kind in Italy, provides individuals with spinal cord injury access to obtain their own ReWalk Personal Exoskeleton device so that they can stand and walk again. Since the initiation of coverage, we have supplied 10 units through our Italian distributor to individuals covered by this policy.
Other Funding Sources
In addition to being funded by third-party payors, including private insurance plans, government programs such as the VHA, and workers’ compensation plans, ReWalk Personal Exoskeleton is also funded by self-payors. This includes individuals who purchase ReWalk with funds from legal settlements with insurance companies or third parties.
AlterG Anti-Gravity System
The DAP technology that underpins our AlterG Anti-Gravity technology originated from researchers at the NASA Moffet Field Research Center to help astronauts maintain their muscle strength and bone density during extended periods in space outside of the effects of earth’s gravity. The DAP technology was used to create a pressurized bubble that could exert pressure on an astronaut while exercising to simulate the impact of gravity. While the technology ultimately was never implemented by NASA, it also had promise for use on earth.
The DAP technology was modified by the founders of AlterG, Inc. for the opposite purpose of using the buoyancy of a pressurized air chamber to uniformly reduce gravitational load and body weight. With subsequent product development, the initial AlterG Anti-Gravity system design was supplemented with other complementary features. Our current models utilize a precise air calibration system which modulates the air pressure supporting the user 100 times a second to ensure precise and consistent weight displacement that allows for modification of the pressurized support in one-percent increments of each user’s weight. Additionally, the AlterG systems can be fitted with cameras for live video monitoring and pressure sensors that track the user’s gait pattern.
Our proprietary Stride Smart software can provide real-time data and analytics so that the user can watch and self-correct gate abnormalities. Clinicians also can simultaneously read and respond to five gait assessment key performance indicators (“KPIs”). The five KPIs include:
● weight-bearing symmetry;
● step length symmetry;
● stance time symmetry;
● cadence (stepping frequency); and
● pain level.
The Stride Smart software provides clinicians with clear, objective data with which to assess, adjust, and modify a patient’s rehabilitation progress. Since Stride Smart collects and presents patient gait data automatically, clinicians can focus their efforts rehabbing the patient and selecting the data most useful to their gait analysis and correction recommendations.
Based on usage patterns and feedback of clinicians, we believe that the AlterG Anti-Gravity system provides a versatile tool for the rehabilitation of lower extremity injuries and conditions. By treating a broad range of conditions and facilitating faster recovery times, the AlterG Anti-Gravity system enables rehabilitation clinics the opportunity to gain more referrals, increase the throughput of the facility, and improve the productivity of the staff.
We offer a range of AlterG Anti-Gravity systems depending on the needs and budget of each customer as follows:
• NEO - Introduced in 2024, this is the entry-level and most accessible model of Anti-Gravity system to enable increased adoption of Anti-Gravity technology across a broader range of clinics and training facilities. The NEO model delivers the same patented DAP technology with an updated platform and new electronic handrail height adjustment. The NEO is equipped to run at up to 10 miles per hour (“mph”) in forward and 3 mph in reverse with a maximum incline of 15 degrees;
• NEO+ - The most versatile offering within the AlterG family builds upon the benefits of the NEO with added speed up to 12 mph and an integrated camera. The NEO+ also offers additional options for further customization, including a high-speed option of up to 15 mph and the addition of our Stride Smart gait analytics software package.; and
• PRO - The PRO is our top-of-the-line model for sports medicine and elite sports applications with utilization by professional and collegiate athletes. The PRO is designed for robust performance with a slat-belt design equipped to run at up to 18 mph in forward and 10 mph in reverse, with all software and speed options included as standard.
In addition to sales of the AlterG Anti-Gravity systems, we also provide consumables and services that support the utilization of the installed base. For example, the AlterG systems require the users to wear proprietary shorts that zip the user into the air chamber to create the seal to maintain the air pressurize. With frequent use, these shorts need to be periodically replaced. Additionally, we maintain a network of approximately 40 contract service engineers who perform the installation, maintenance, and repair work. As the 12-month assurance warranties expire, we market extended service contracts which can provide a recurring revenue base that can grow with the size of the installed base.
The potential market for AlterG Anti-Gravity systems is large and fragmented with several types of facilities that treat patients with conditions who could benefit from rehabilitation using partial weight displacement. According to the MedPAC 2024 Report, there are approximately 1,180 certified inpatient rehabilitation facilities in the U.S. These facilities treat patients with a range of conditions including stroke, lower extremity fractures, joint replacements, neurological conditions and brain injury, cardiac conditions, and other types of orthopaedic conditions. Depending on the specific details of each case, many of these patients are candidates for therapy using partial weight displacement. Globally, we estimate that there are approximately 3,500 inpatient rehabilitation facilities that are comparable in budget and quality of care to those in the U.S.
The largest potential market for the AlterG Anti-Gravity systems are outpatient clinics, some of which are in national and regional affiliations and most of which are independent facilities. According to the IBIS World Industry Report (which tracks the number of physical therapy rehabilitation centers), there were approximately 54,000 outpatient clinics in the U.S. in 2024. These facilities treat patients with less severe conditions than inpatient facilities with a greater mix of patients skewed towards lower extremity fractures, joint replacements, and other types of orthopedic conditions. Globally, we estimate that there are over 100,000 outpatient clinics based on scaling of population and standard of living that there are over 100,000 outpatient clinics. One other major segment of the market for AlterG systems consists of professional and elite level sports teams, including major university and college sports programs. These teams use the AlterG Anti-Gravity system to assist their players in maintaining higher levels of fitness and accelerating the recovery time from sports-related injuries. Based on our internal estimates of the market, we believe that there are approximately 1,400 sports programs in the U.S. who are potential AlterG customers. Globally, we estimate this figure to be greater than 4,000 teams.
ReStore Exo-Suit
In June 2017, we unveiled our lightweight ReStore Exo-Suit system designed initially for rehabilitation of stroke patients. The patented soft exo-suit technology was originally developed at Harvard University’s Wyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering (“Harvard”), where it also underwent initial clinical testing that demonstrated potential to improve walking for stroke survivors. ReWalk and Harvard entered into a multi-year research collaboration agreement in 2016 which provides ReWalk license to intellectual property relating to lightweight exo-suit system technologies for lower limb disabilities and provides access to future innovations that emerge from this collaboration and may be relevant to additional stroke products or other therapies. The development and regulatory clearance process for ReStore took us approximately three years. We received FDA clearance for ReStore in June 2019. We also obtained a CE mark in May 2019 but because the ReStore product was not planned for MDR conformity we had to cease sales in the EU in May 2024. Following the regulatory clearances, we began to commercialize the ReStore product. For more information on the collaboration with Harvard, see “Research and Development-Research and Development Collaborations.”
ReStore Exo-Suit
The ReStore product consists of a soft, fabric-based design that connects to a lightweight waist pack and mechanical cables that help lift the patient’s affected leg in synchronized timing with their natural walking pattern. The lightweight structure wraps around the waist and supports an actuator with a motor, computer, and cable, along with sensors attached to a stable point on the user’s calf and footplate in the user’s shoe. This design provides targeted mechanical assistance to the patient’s ankle during forward propulsion (plantarflexion) and ground clearance (dorsiflexion), two key phases of the gait cycle. The ReStore system is designed to provide advantages to stroke rehabilitation clinics and therapists as compared to other traditional therapies and devices by enabling the therapist to specifically target and train for improved propulsion symmetry, which is a key contributor to improved walking speed and efficiency for patients recovering from stroke.
Published clinical trials using the soft exo-suit design on stroke patients have shown varying levels of improvements, with the main ones being improved walking speed, improved propulsion symmetry, reductions in compensatory behaviors including paretic hip hiking and circumduction as well as reduction in metabolic burden associated with post stroke walking. There are additional studies on-going with the ReStore device that examine the improvement in walking speed following training with the soft exo-suit as well as comparing the results of traditional training with soft exo-suit training.
The main market for ReStore is rehabilitation clinics with a stroke therapy program or clinics that would like to broaden their stroke presence. This product is marketed and sold directly to rehabilitation clinics for use during the treatment of their patients which is generally reimbursed by commercial and government payors. During the second half of 2019 we expanded our sales and marketing presence in the United States to accelerate product penetration after receiving FDA clearance and CE mark. These efforts were adversely impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic, as clinics and hospitals shifted resources and attention during the pandemic. During 2024, new research was published on the clinical efficacy using ReStore in stroke rehabilitation and we see this technology as a building block for future portfolio development.
Stroke incidence rate in the United States is approximately 800,000 incidences per year and the survival rate is approximately 80%. Of this stroke population, 80% are left with some type of lower limb disability. This patient population seeks treatment in one of the approximately 1,600 primary and comprehensive inpatient, outpatient, and rehabilitation clinics providing therapy to stroke patients. With the clinical evidence we have to date on ReStore, its unique design and its cost-effectiveness compared to other products, we believe the ReStore soft exosuit has an opportunity to be adopted by clinics for use in therapy of their stroke patients. However, we also recognize that the process to achieve that might be long and will likely only occur once national or regional healthcare providers include the device within their stroke therapy programs. We also believe that to accelerate adoption, further clinical evidence is required as well as continued education on the new ReStore design and its unique advantages compared to current therapies and products.
As of December 31, 2024, and December 31, 2023, we had placed 43 and 42 ReStore units, respectively.
ReBoot Product
We are also in the research stage of ReBoot, a soft exoskeleton for stroke home and community use, and are currently evaluating the reimbursement landscape and the potential clinical impact of this device. This product would be a complementary product to ReStore, and it received Breakthrough Device Designation from the FDA in November 2021. The ReBoot is a lightweight, battery-powered exo-suit intended to assist ambulatory functions in individuals with reduced ankle function related to neurological injuries, such as stroke. The ReBoot is a customizable personalized device intended for home and community use with an estimated market of approximately 400,000 annual stroke patients who require walking assistance after being discharged home. Further investment in the development path of the ReBoot was paused in 2023 pending further determination about the clinical and commercial opportunity of this device and at this time it remains on hold.
Sales and Marketing Activities
With added resources from acquiring AlterG, Inc., we have created a U.S. commercial team that we believe has the capacity and capabilities to support a broad range of physical and neurological rehabilitation products for use in facilities, the home and the community. As part of this integration, we have rebranded our company under the name Lifeward, to emphasize our commitment to pioneering a portfolio of innovative technologies to empower the pursuit of life’s ambitions in the face of physical limitation or disability. For the sake of clarity, we will continue to use the ReWalk name to designate our line of exoskeleton products and the AlterG name to describe our line of Anti-Gravity systems.
In the U.S., our commercial efforts are direct sales focused generally on rehabilitation centers, hospitals, rehabilitation clinics, and similar facilities that treat patients who could benefit from offerings within our portfolio of products. We market our facility-based products, such as the AlterG and the MyoCycle Pro to these institutions for their use in providing care to their patients. We also market our home-based products, such as the ReWalk Personal Exoskeleton or MyoCycle Home, to physicians and physical therapists for referrals to individuals who could benefit from these devices as part of a home-based activity regimen that elevates the health and wellness of these individuals. Additionally, some sales of the ReWalk Personal Exoskeleton or MyoCycle Home are also generated from referrals through the spinal cord injury community and direct inquiries from potential users through our different marketing efforts. Beyond healthcare facilities, we also market our AlterG systems to professional and college sports teams who use the systems to help their athletes recover from lower extremity sports injuries.
Outside the U.S., our distribution varies depending on the product and the geographic market. We market our ReWalk Personal Exoskeleton product directly in Germany and primarily through third-party distributors, who maintain the customer relationships, in our other markets. We market our AlterG systems directly in Canada, and in other territories utilize a network of over 40 third-party distributors who generally have exclusivity in their respective geographic territories.
As of December 31, 2024, we had placed 131 ReWalk Rehabilitation Exoskeleton units in use at rehabilitation centers and 689 ReWalk Personal Exoskeleton units in a home or community use, compared to 131 ReWalk Rehabilitation Exoskeleton units and 616 ReWalk Personal Exoskeleton units as of December 31, 2023. We estimate the installed base of AlterG systems is over 6,000 installed units worldwide as of December 31, 2024. With the finalization of the Medicare payment rates for exoskeletons that was effective April 1, 2024, we have begun to aggressively target the eligible Medicare customer base for growth while also continuing to focus on expanding commercial and other reimbursement coverage. Additionally, with our increased direct sales resources and distributor network, we also expect to greater penetrate the base of facilities which could utilize AlterG systems for rehabilitation of their patients.
Competition
The market in which we operate is characterized by active competition and rapid technological change, and we expect competition to increase. Competition arises from providers of other mobility systems and prosthetic devices used in the clinic and/or home settings.
We are aware of several other companies developing competing technology and devices, and some of these competitors may have greater resources, greater name recognition, broader product lines, or larger customer bases than we do.
Our principal competitors in the medical exoskeleton market consist of Ekso Bionics (NASDAQ: EKSO), Rex Bionics Pty, Cyberdyne (Tokyo Stock Exchange: 7779), FREE Bionics, DIH (formerly known as Hocoma), Wandercraft, and Bioness (acquired by Bioventus (NASDAQ: BVS)). The competitors’ products may also compete with the ReStore Exo-Suit, as well as manual forms of gait training which do not involve robotic assistive devices.
We believe that our ReWalk Personal Exoskeleton possesses key competitive advantages over these companies’ products, such as our tilt-sensor technology that provides a self-initiated walking experience, six degrees of freedom which enable a more natural gait, faster functional walking speed, the ability to support its own weight, and robust durability in real-world conditions. In addition, ReWalk Personal Exoskeleton is the only medical exoskeleton with FDA and CE clearance for use on stairs and curbs, which greatly improves the ability to use the device in everyday real-world environments.
We believe that our ReStore Exo-Suit device has several competitive advantages over the products of our competitors, including a design that facilitates a natural, functional walking pattern through flexible materials, sensors, and powered plantarflexion as well as dorsiflexion, making it the only solution of its type of which we are aware of that supports such movements, achieving that with a lower cost and weight than rigid exoskeletal devices.
In addition, are aware of a number of academic and early stage research into exoskeletons for various applications. Other medical device or robotics companies, academic and research institutions, or others may develop new technologies or therapies that provide a superior walking experience, are more effective in treating the secondary medical conditions that we target or are less expensive than our current or future products. Our technologies and products could be rendered obsolete by such developments.
We may also compete with other treatments and technologies that address the secondary medical conditions that ReWalk seeks to mitigate.
Community Engagement and Education
We devote significant resources to engagement with and education of the spinal cord injury community with respect to the benefits of our SCI Products. We actively seek opportunities to partner with hospitals, rehabilitation centers and key opinion leaders to engage in research and development and clinical activities. We also seek to educate and gain support from organizations such as patient advocacy groups and clinician societies with the goal of promoting adoption of exoskeleton technology from patient, clinician, and payor communities. We believe that our success has been and will continue to be driven in part by our reputation and acceptance within the spinal cord injury community.
To date, multiple advocacy groups have issued public endorsements of the ReWalk Personal Exoskeleton, including leading United States-based national organizations such as the United Spinal Association and the Dana and Christopher Reeves Foundation, as well as others. In addition, the National Institute for Health and Care excellence in the United Kingdom (also known as “NICE”) has issued a public announcement regarding the ReStore device.
Services and Customer Support
Our commercial centers of operations in Marlborough, Massachusetts and Berlin, Germany coordinate all customer support and product service functions for North America and Europe, respectively, through dedicated technical service personnel who provide product services and customer support through training to healthcare providers and support to product users. We also had a commercial location in Fremont, California where we ceased operations as of December 31, 2024.
Research and Development
We are committed to investing in a robust research and development program to support our current product line and to potentially develop our pipeline of new and complementary products, and we believe that ongoing research and development efforts are essential to our success. Our research and development team consists of both in-house and external staff, including engineers, machinists, researchers and marketing, quality, manufacturing, regulatory and clinical personnel, which we employ as efficiently as possible meet our current and future needs, and who work closely together to design, enhance, and validate our technologies. This research and development team conceptualizes technologies and then builds and tests prototypes before refining and/or redesigning, as necessary. Our regulatory and clinical personnel work in parallel with engineers and researchers, allowing us to anticipate and resolve potential issues at early stages in the development cycle. Our level of research and development investment depends on our available resources, business plans, and future needs. For more information, see “Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors - Risks Related to Our Business and Our Industry - Our future growth and operating results will depend on our ability to develop, receive regulatory clearance for, and commercialize new products and penetrate new product and geographic markets.”
We are working on product design improvements and expanded labeling for the ReWalk Personal Exoskeleton product which we plan to launch following obtaining regulatory clearance and approvals. In the longer term we are conducting research for our next generation exoskeleton with design improvements and advanced robotic technologies such machine vision, AI and sensor fusion as part of the Human Robot Interaction Consortium research program. New medical indications impacting the ability to walk that we may pursue include multiple sclerosis, cerebral palsy, Parkinson’s disease, and elderly assistance.
We are also considering new generations of anti-gravity systems utilizing our DAP technology, including the NEO which was introduced in 2024 as an entry-level and most accessible model of Anti-Gravity™ system to enable increased adoption of Anti-Gravity™ technology across a broader range of clinics and training facilities. Additionally, we are evaluating other applications for DAP technology to create entirely new rehabilitation systems for our facility-based customers.
We conduct our research and development efforts mainly at our facility in Yokneam, Israel. We believe that the close interaction among our research and development and manufacturing groups allows for timely and effective realization of our new product concepts.
Our research and development efforts have been financed, in part, through funding from the Israel Innovation Authority (formerly known as Office of the Chief Scientist in the Israel Ministry of Economy) (the “IIA”). From our inception through December 31, 2024, we received funding totalling $2.8 million from the IIA. For more information regarding our research and development financing arrangements, see “Part II. Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations-Liquidity and Capital Resources” and “-Grants and Other Funding.”
Research and Development Collaborations
On April 1, 2022, we entered a research and development cooperation agreement with several companies and universities in the Human Robot Interaction (“HRI”) Consortium, part of the IIA’s MAGNET incentive program. This incentive program provides grants for R&D collaboration as part of a consortium comprised of private businesses and leading academic centers. The goals of the HRI consortium are to “develop advanced technologies aimed at providing robots with social capabilities, enabling them to carry out various tasks and effective interactions with different users in diverse operational environments.” The total program has a budget of NIS 57 million, which includes funding for research and development grants to help drive technological innovation. The Consortium is a 3-year program which has allocated NIS 1.745 million to fund ReWalk-specific projects over the first 18-month period of the program. In November 2023, we entered the second 18-month period of the program, the Consortium has allocated NIS 1.336 million to fund ReWalk-specific projects over the second 18-month period. As of December 31, 2024, the Company spent total funds in the amount of NIS 2.903 million. As a member of the HRI Consortium, we collaborate with several universities to develop advanced technologies aimed at improving the human-exoskeleton interaction. This research collaboration with top researchers in the fields of robotics, behavioral sciences and human-computer interaction will seek to make the use of exoskeletons easier and more natural to promote wider adoption of the technology.
On May 16, 2016, we entered into the Research Collaboration Agreement (“Collaboration Agreement”) and the Exclusive License Agreement (“Harvard License Agreement”) with Harvard. Under the Collaboration Agreement, we and Harvard agreed to collaborate on research regarding the development of lightweight soft suit exoskeleton system technologies for lower limb disabilities, which are intended to treat stroke, multiple sclerosis, mobility limitations for the elderly and other medical applications. Under the Collaboration Agreement, we paid Harvard quarterly installment payments to help fund the research. Subject to the terms of the Collaboration Agreement, we and Harvard were required to report our respective research results and findings to each other on a regular basis. The Collaboration Agreement governed ownership of the research results and inventions generated in performance of the research collaboration and provided us the option to negotiate with Harvard for a license to certain new inventions of Harvard conceived in performance of the collaboration. The Collaboration Agreement concluded on March 31, 2022.
Under the Harvard License Agreement, we have been granted an exclusive, worldwide royalty-bearing license under certain patents of Harvard relating to lightweight “soft suit” exoskeleton system technologies for lower limb disabilities, a royalty-free license under certain related know-how and the option to obtain a license to certain inventions conceived under our joint research collaboration. Harvard retains the right to practice the patents for research, educational and scholarly purposes. We are required to use commercially reasonable efforts to develop products under the Harvard License Agreement in accordance with an agreed-upon development plan and to introduce and market such products commercially. In addition to an upfront fee and royalties on net sales, we are obligated to pay Harvard certain milestone payments upon the achievement of certain product development and commercialization milestones. We have also agreed to reimburse Harvard for expenses incurred in connection with the filing, prosecution, and maintenance of the licensed patents.
The Harvard License Agreement will continue in full force and effect until the expiration of the last-to-expire valid claim of the licensed patents, or it is terminated in accordance with its terms. We may terminate the License Agreement for any reason upon 60 days’ prior written notice, while Harvard may terminate the License Agreement if we do not maintain requisite insurance or become insolvent. The Harvard License Agreement may also be terminated by Harvard or us due to the other party’s material uncured breach.
The Harvard License Agreement contains, as applicable, customary representations and warranties and customary enforcement, indemnification, and insurance provisions. For further discussion of the Collaboration Agreement and Harvard License Agreement, see Note 10 to our consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024 included elsewhere in this annual report.
Intellectual Property
Protection of our intellectual property is important to our business. We seek to protect our intellectual property through a combination of patents, trademarks, confidentiality, and assignment agreements with our employees and certain of our contractors and confidentiality agreements with certain of our consultants, scientific advisors and other vendors and contractors. In addition, we rely on trade secrets law to protect our proprietary software and product candidates/products in development.
In addition to our portfolio of issued patents and pending patent applications, we license certain patented and patented pending technology from a third party as described above under the “Research and Development” section.
For our ReWalk product line, as of December 31, 2024, we have 12 issued patents in the United States and 24 issued patents outside of the United States, as well as 11 pending patent applications for our technology in the United States, China, and Europe, including one pending international PCT application. For our patents associated with DAP and other AlterG technology, as of December 31, 2024, we have 28 issued patents in the United States and 9 patents issued outside the United States, as well as 10 pending patent applications for anti-gravity associated technology in the United States.
In the United States and Europe, we have apparatus patent claims covering aspects of both our exoskeleton and our anti-gravity products and similar devices or systems, which focus on protecting our products in terms of structural characteristics and functionality. Moreover, we also have method patent claims covering certain methods of operation and control of our exoskeleton and anti-gravity products, which provide additional protection for our technology. We do not currently license any of the technology contained in our currently commercialized ReWalk and AlterG products, other than with respect to technology that is generally publicly available, but we may do so in the future.
Patents filed both in the United States and Europe (as well as other countries) generally have a term of 20 years from their earliest effective filing date, although they can be slightly longer depending upon a local jurisdiction’s rules and laws. For example, the oldest of our issued patents relating to our tilt-sensor technology was filed in May 2001 in the United States and would typically expire in May 2021. However, this patent actually expired in April of 2023 due to patent term adjustment (PTA) of 689 days for delays in examination by the United States Patent and Trademark Office.
We currently hold a registered trademark in the United States, Europe, Israel, and the United Kingdom, for the mark ReWalk®. We currently hold a registered trademark in United States, Europe and the United Kingdom for the mark ReStore®. We currently hold the trademarks Alter G™ and Anti-Gravity Treadmill™ in the United States, Canada and Japan. The trademark Alter G™ is also held in the United Kingdom and Europe. We currently hold the registered trademark Defy Gravity® in the United States. We also hold a registered trademark for Lifeward® in the Europe, the United Kingdom, and Israel. The application to register the trademark Lifeward™ is pending in the United States.
We cannot be sure that our intellectual property will provide us with a competitive advantage especially as some of our older patents begin to expire, or that we will not infringe on the intellectual property rights of others. In addition, we cannot be sure that any patents will be granted in a timely manner or at all with respect to any of our patent pending applications. For a more comprehensive discussion of the risks related to our intellectual property, see “Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors-Risks Related to Our Intellectual Property.”
Government Regulation
U.S. Regulation
Our medical products and manufacturing operations are regulated by the FDA and other federal and state agencies. Our products are regulated as medical devices in the United States under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, or the FFDCA, as implemented and enforced by the FDA. The FDA regulates the development, testing, manufacturing, labeling, storage, installation, servicing, advertising, promotion, marketing, distribution, import, export, and market surveillance of our medical devices.
Premarket Regulatory Requirements
Unless an exemption applies, each medical device commercially distributed in the United States requires either FDA clearance of a 510(k) premarket notification, approval of a premarket approval application (PMA), or issuance of a de novo classification order. Under the FFDCA, medical devices are classified into one of three classes-Class I, Class II or Class III-depending on the degree of risk associated with each medical device and the extent of control needed to provide reasonable assurance of safety and effectiveness. Classification of a device is important because the class to which a device is assigned determines, among other things, the necessity and type of FDA review required prior to marketing the device. Class I devices are those for which reasonable assurance of safety and effectiveness can be assured by adherence to general controls that include compliance with the applicable portions of the FDA’s Quality System Regulation, or QSR, facility registration and product listing, reporting of adverse medical events, and appropriate, truthful and non-misleading labeling, advertising, and promotional materials. Class I also includes devices for which there is insufficient information to determine that general controls are sufficient to provide reasonable assurance of the safety and effectiveness of the device or to establish special controls to provide such assurance, but that are not life-supporting or life-sustaining or for a use which is of substantial importance in preventing impairment of human health, and that do not present a potential unreasonable risk of illness of injury.
Class II devices are those for which general controls alone are insufficient to provide reasonable assurance of safety and effectiveness and there is sufficient information to establish “special controls.” These special controls can include performance standards, post-market surveillance, and patient registries. While most Class I devices are exempt from the 510(k) premarket notification requirement, most Class II devices require a 510(k) premarket notification to be marketed in the U.S. As a result, manufacturers of most Class II devices are required to submit to the FDA premarket notifications under Section 510(k) of the FFDCA in order to market or commercially distribute those devices. To obtain 510(k) clearance, manufacturers must demonstrate that the proposed device is “substantially equivalent” to a predicate device already on the market. A predicate device is a legally marketed device that is not subject to premarket approval, or PMA, meaning, (i) a device that was legally marketed prior to May 28, 1976 (pre-amendments device) and for which a PMA is not required, (ii) a device that has been reclassified from Class III to Class II or I, or (iii) a device that was found substantially equivalent through the 510(k) process. If the FDA agrees that the device is substantially equivalent to a predicate device currently on the market, it will grant 510(k) clearance to commercially market the device. If the device is not “substantially equivalent” to a previously cleared device, the device is automatically a Class III device. The device sponsor must then fulfill more rigorous premarket approval requirements or can request a risk-based classification determination for the device in accordance with the “de novo” classification process, which is a route to market for medical devices that are low to moderate risk but are not substantially equivalent to a predicate device.
Devices that are intended to be life sustaining or life supporting, devices that are implantable, devices that present a potential unreasonable risk of harm or are of substantial importance in preventing impairment of health, and devices that are not substantially equivalent to a predicate device are placed in Class III and generally require approval of a PMA, unless the device is a pre-amendment device not yet subject to a regulation requiring premarket approval. The PMA process is more demanding than the 510(k) premarket notification process. In a PMA, the manufacturer must demonstrate that the device is safe and effective, and the PMA must be supported by extensive data, including data from preclinical studies and clinical trials. The PMA must also contain a full description of the device and its components, a full description of the methods, facilities and controls used for manufacturing, and proposed labeling. Following receipt of a PMA, the FDA determines whether the application is sufficiently complete to permit a substantive review. If the FDA accepts the application for review, it has 180 days under the FFDCA to complete its review of a PMA, although in practice, the FDA’s review often takes significantly longer and can take one year or more.
Clinical trials are almost always required to support PMAs and are sometimes required to support 510(k) submissions. All clinical investigations of devices to determine safety and effectiveness must be conducted in accordance with the FDA’s investigational device exemption, or IDE, regulations that govern investigational device labeling, prohibit promotion of the investigational device, and specify recordkeeping, reporting and monitoring responsibilities of study sponsors and study investigators. If the device presents a “significant risk,” as defined by the FDA, the agency requires the device sponsor to submit an IDE application to the FDA, which must become effective prior to commencing human clinical trials. The IDE will automatically become effective 30 days after receipt by the FDA, unless the FDA denies the application or notifies the company that the investigation may not begin. If the FDA determines that there are deficiencies or other concerns with an IDE that require modification of the study, the FDA may permit a clinical trial to proceed under a conditional approval. In addition, the study must be approved by, and conducted under the oversight of, an Institutional Review Board, or IRB, for each clinical site. If the device presents a non-significant risk to the patient, a sponsor may begin the clinical trial after obtaining approval for the trial by one or more IRBs without separate approval from the FDA, but must still comply with abbreviated IDE requirements, such as monitoring the investigation, ensuring that the investigators obtain informed consent, and labeling and record-keeping requirements.
In June 2014, the FDA granted our request for “de novo” classification, and classified ReWalk as a Class II powered exoskeleton device subject to special controls. The ReWalk is intended to enable individuals with spinal cord injuries to perform ambulatory functions under supervision of a specially trained companion, and inside rehabilitation institutions. The special controls established in the de novo classification order for all powered exoskeleton devices include the following: clinical testing to demonstrate safe and effective use considering the level of supervision necessary and the use environment; non-clinical safety and performance testing, including durability testing to demonstrate that the device performs as intended under anticipated conditions of use; a training program; and labeling related to device use and user training. The special controls of this de novo order also apply to competing powered exoskeleton products seeking FDA clearance.
In June 2019, the FDA issued a 510(k) clearance for ReStore, which means that the device can be marketed in the U.S. ReStore is intended to be used to assist ambulatory functions in rehabilitation institutions under the supervision of a trained therapist for people with hemiplegia or hemiparesis due to stroke. ReStore complies with special controls for powered exoskeletons as described above. In order for us to market ReStore and ReWalk, we must comply with both these special controls as well as general controls, including controls related to quality, facility registration, reporting of adverse events and labelling. Failure to comply with the general and special controls could lead to removal of ReStore or ReWalk from the market, which would have a material adverse effect on our business.
In March 2023, we received 510(k) clearance for the ReWalk Personal Exoskeleton with an indication for standing and walking on level surfaces and mild slopes and ascending and descending stairs and curbs. In June 2024, we submitted a 510(k) premarket notification for the ReWalk 7 Personal Exoskeleton, a next-generation ReWalk model, and the 510(k) is currently pending review by the FDA.
For more information, see “Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors-Risks Related to Government Regulation-We are subject to extensive governmental regulations relating to the manufacturing, labelling and marketing of our products, and a failure to comply with such regulations could lead to withdrawal or recall of our products from the market.”
Expedited Development and Review Programs
FDA’s Breakthrough Devices Program is a voluntary program offered to manufacturers of certain medical devices and device-led combination products that may provide for more effective treatment or diagnosis of life-threatening or irreversibly debilitating diseases or conditions. The goal of the program is to provide patients and health care providers with more timely access to qualifying devices by expediting their development, assessment and review, while preserving the statutory standards for marketing authorization.
The program is available to medical devices that meet certain eligibility criteria, including that the device provides more effective treatment or diagnosis of life-threatening or irreversibly debilitating diseases or conditions, and that the device meets one of the following criteria: (i) the device represents a breakthrough technology, (ii) no approved or cleared alternatives exist, (iii) the device offers significant advantages over existing approved or cleared alternatives, or (iv) the availability of the device is in the best interest of patients. Breakthrough Device designation provides certain benefits to device developers, including more interactive and timely communications with FDA staff, use of post market data collection, when scientifically appropriate, to facilitate expedited and efficient development and review of the device, opportunities for efficient and flexible clinical study design, and prioritized review of premarket submissions.
Post-Market Regulatory Requirements
After a device is cleared for marketing, numerous regulatory requirements apply. These include:
●
establishment registration and device listing;
●
development of a quality assurance system, including establishing and implementing procedures to design and manufacture devices;
●
labeling regulations that prohibit the promotion of products for unapproved or “off-label” uses and impose other restrictions on labeling;
●
FDA’s Unique Device Identification requirements that call for a unique device identifier (UDI) on device labels and packages and submission of data to the FDA’s Global Unique Device Identification Database (GUDID);
●
medical device reporting regulations that require manufacturers to report to the FDA if a device may have caused or contributed to a death or serious injury or malfunctioned in a way that would likely cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if it were to recur; and corrections and removal reporting regulations that require manufacturers report to the FDA field corrections and product recalls or removals if undertaken to reduce a risk to health posed by the device or to remedy a violation of the FFDCA that may present a risk to health; and
●
post-market surveillance.
Our manufacturing processes are required to comply with the applicable portions of the FDA’s Quality System Regulation (“QSR”) that covers the methods and the facilities and controls for the design, manufacture, testing, production, processes, controls, quality assurance, labeling, packaging, distribution, installation, and servicing of finished devices intended for human use. In February 2024, the FDA issued the Quality Management System Regulation (“QMSR”) Final Rule to amend the QSR, incorporating by reference the international standard for medical device quality management systems set by the International Organization for Standardization (ISO), ISO 13485:2016. The rule will become effective on February 2, 2026. Until then, manufacturers are required to comply with the QSR. We actively maintain compliance with the FDA’s QSR, and the European Union’s Quality Management Systems requirements, ISO 13485:2016.
As a manufacturer, we are subject to periodic scheduled or unscheduled inspections by the FDA. If the FDA believes we or any of our contract manufacturers are not in compliance with the quality system requirements, or other post-market requirements, it has significant enforcement authority. Specifically, if the FDA determines that we failed to comply with applicable regulatory requirements, it can take a variety of compliance or enforcement actions, which may result in any of the following sanctions:
●
untitled letters, warning letters, fines, injunctions, consent decrees and civil penalties;
●
customer notifications or repair, replacement, or refunds;
●
recalls, withdrawals, or administrative detention or seizure of our products;
●
operating restrictions or partial suspension or total shutdown of production;
●
refusing or delaying requests for approval of pre-market approval applications relating to new products or modified products;
●
withdrawing PMA approval or reclassifying our devices;
●
refusal to grant export approvals for our products; or
●
pursuing criminal prosecution.
Any such action by the FDA would have a material adverse effect on our business. In addition, these regulatory controls, as well as any changes in FDA policies, can affect the time and cost associated with the development, introduction, and continued availability of new products. Where possible, we anticipate these factors in our product development processes.
Regulation Outside of the U.S.
In addition to the United States regulations, we are subject to a variety of foreign regulations governing clinical trials and commercial sales and distribution of our products. In the E.U., medical devices are regulated by the European Union Medical Devices Regulation (EU) 2017/745 or MDR, which became applicable on May 26, 2021, and replaced the E.U. Medical Devices Directive 93/42/EEC, or MDD. The MDR and its associated guidance documents and harmonized standards, govern, among other things, device design and development, preclinical and clinical or performance testing, premarket conformity assessment, registration, manufacturing, labeling, claims, distribution, export and import and post-market surveillance, vigilance, and market surveillance.
Before a device can be placed on the market in the E.U., compliance with the MDR requirements must be demonstrated in order to affix the CE mark to the product. The method of assessing conformity varies depending on the class of the product but normally involves a combination of self-assessment by the manufacturer and a third-party assessment by a “Notified Body.” This third-party assessment may consist of an audit of the manufacturer’s quality system or specific testing of the manufacturer’s product. The Notified Body issues a CE Certificate of Conformity to confirm successful completion of a conformity assessment procedure conducted in relation to the medical device and its manufacturer and their conformity with the essential requirements provided in the MDR. Under transitional provisions provided in the MDR, medical devices that had valid CE Certificates of Conformity issued under the MDD prior to May 26, 2021 and that remained valid (and not withdrawn) on March 20, 2023, can continue to be placed on the EEA market until the end of December 2027 or 2028 (depending on the class of device), provided the device’s manufacturer complies with certain requirements, including that there are no significant changes in the design and intended purpose of the applicable device. After the expiry of any applicable transitional period, only devices that have been CE marked on the basis of the MDR may be placed on the market in the EEA. We comply with the E.U. requirements and have received ta Notified Body Certificate of Conformity under the MDD for our ReWalk systems which are distributed in the E.U. This allows us to continue to apply the CE mark to our products and place them on the market throughout the E.U. during the transition period or until we have completed an appropriate conformity assessment procedure under the MDR. On August 2024, we submitted our application for the MDR assessment of the ReWalk 7 Personal Exoskeleton, and the submission is currently being reviewed by our Notified Body. The ReStore product was not planned for MDR conformity and accordingly, we had to cease sales of the ReStore in the EU in May 2024.
Following the U.K.’s exit from the E.U. (known as “Brexit”), the MDR does not apply in the United Kingdom (except for Northern Ireland, which under the Northern Ireland Protocol is bound by certain E.U. laws). The medical device legislative framework in the United Kingdom is set out in the Medical Devices Regulations 2002, as amended. These regulations are based on the previous medical device directives of the E.U. but have been amended so that they function properly now the United Kingdom is no longer part of the E.U. The Medical Devices Regulations 2002 have introduced several changes including (but not limited to) replacing the CE mark with a UKCA marking (although E.U. CE marks will be recognized potentially up until June 2030), requiring manufacturers outside of the United Kingdom to appoint a “UK Responsible Person” if they place devices on the Great Britain market and more wide-ranging device registration requirements.
Sales in other jurisdictions are subject to the foreign government regulations of the relevant jurisdiction, and in most cases, we must obtain approval by the appropriate regulatory authorities before we can commence clinical trials or marketing activities in those countries. The approval process varies from country to country, and the time may be longer or shorter than that required to obtain a marketing authorization in the United States or the CE mark in the E.U. The requirements governing the conduct of clinical trials, product licensing, pricing and reimbursement vary greatly from country to country.
The policies of the FDA and foreign regulatory authorities may change, and additional government regulations may be enacted that could prevent or delay regulatory approval of our products and could also increase the cost of regulatory compliance. We cannot predict the likelihood, nature, or extent of adverse governmental regulation that might arise from future legislative or administrative action, either in the United States or abroad.
U.S. Anti-Kickback, False Claims and Other Healthcare Fraud and Abuse Laws
In the United States, there are federal and state anti-kickback laws that prohibit the payment or receipt of kickbacks, bribes or other remuneration intended to induce the purchase or recommendation of healthcare products and services. Violations of these laws can lead to civil and criminal penalties, including exclusion from participation in federal healthcare programs. These laws apply to manufacturers of products, such as us, with respect to our financial relationship with hospitals, physicians and other potential purchasers or acquirers of our products. The U.S. government has published regulations that identify “safe harbors” or exemptions for certain practices from enforcement actions under the federal anti-kickback statute, and we will seek to comply with the safe harbors where possible. The federal anti-kickback law also contains several statutory safe harbor exceptions. To qualify for a safe harbor, the activity must fit squarely within the safe harbor. Arrangements that do not meet a safe harbor are not necessarily illegal but must be evaluated on a case-by-case basis. A person or entity may be found to violate the anti-kickback statute even absent actual knowledge of this statute or specific intent to violate it. In addition, the government may assert that a claim that includes items or services resulting from a violation of the federal anti-kickback statute constitutes a false or fraudulent claim for purposes of the federal False Claims Act (“FCA”).
The civil FCA prohibits, among other things, any person or entity from knowingly presenting, or causing to be presented, a false or fraudulent claim for payment to, or approval by, the federal government, knowingly making, using, or causing to be made or used a false record or statement material to a false or fraudulent claim to the federal government, or avoiding, decreasing, or concealing an obligation to pay money to the federal government. A claim includes “any request or demand” for money or property presented to the U.S. government. The civil FCA has been used to assert liability on the basis of kickbacks and other improper referrals, improper use of Medicare provider or supplier numbers when detailing a provider of services, improper promotion of off-label uses not covered by a device’s clearance or approval, and allegations as to misrepresentations with respect to products, contract requirements, and services rendered. In addition, private payors have been filing follow-on lawsuits alleging fraudulent misrepresentation, although establishing liability and damages in these cases is more difficult than under the FCA. Intent to deceive is not required to establish liability under the civil FCA. Civil FCA actions may be brought by the government or may be brought by private individuals on behalf of the government, called “qui tam” actions. If the government decides to intervene in a qui tam action and prevails in the lawsuit, the individual will share in the proceeds from any fines or settlement funds. If the government declines to intervene, the individual may pursue the case alone. The civil FCA provides for treble damages and a civil penalty for each false claim, such as an invoice or pharmacy claim for reimbursement, which can aggregate into millions of dollars. For these reasons, FCA lawsuits against biopharmaceutical and device companies have increased significantly in volume and breadth, leading to several substantial civil and criminal settlements, as much as $3.0 billion, regarding certain sales practices and promoting off label uses. Civil FCA liability may further be imposed for known Medicare or Medicaid overpayments that are not refunded within 60 days of discovering the overpayment, even if the overpayment was not caused by a false or fraudulent act. In addition, conviction or civil judgment for violating the FCA may result in exclusion from federal health care programs, and suspension and debarment from government contracts, and refusal of orders under existing government contracts.
The government may further prosecute conduct constituting a false claim under the criminal FCA. The criminal FCA prohibits the making or presenting of a claim to the government knowing such claim to be false, fictitious, or fraudulent and, unlike the civil FCA, requires proof of intent to submit a false claim.
The civil monetary penalties statute is another statute under which medical device companies may potentially be subject to enforcement. Among other things, the civil monetary penalties statue imposes fines against any person who offers to provide remuneration to any individual eligible for benefits under Medicare or Medicaid that the offerer knows or should know is likely to influence the individual to order or receive from a particular provider or supplier of any item or service reimbursable under those programs.
The federal Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (“HIPAA”) also created federal criminal statutes that prohibit, among other actions, knowingly and willfully executing, or attempting to execute, a scheme to defraud or to obtain, by means of false or fraudulent pretenses, representations or promises, any of the money or property owned by, or under the custody or control of, a healthcare benefit program, regardless of whether the payor is public or private, in connection with the delivery or payment for health care benefits, knowingly and willfully embezzling or stealing from a health care benefit program, willfully obstructing a criminal investigation of a health care offense and knowingly and willfully falsifying, concealing, or covering up by any trick or device a material fact or making any materially false statements in connection with the delivery of, or payment for, healthcare benefits, items, or services relating to healthcare matters. Additionally, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, as amended by the Health Care and Education Affordability Reconciliation Act, or collectively the “ACA”, amended the intent requirement of certain of these criminal statutes under HIPAA so that a person or entity no longer needs to have actual knowledge of the statute, or the specific intent to violate it, to have committed a violation.
The Physician Payments Sunshine Act (“Sunshine Act”) requires annual reporting, by applicable device and drug manufacturers, of covered products, payments, and other transfers of value to certain health care providers, and ownership and investment interests held by physicians and their immediate family members.
Further, we may be subject to data privacy and security regulation by both the federal government and the states in which we conduct our business. HIPAA, as amended by the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act (“HITECH”) and its respective implementing regulations imposes certain requirements on covered entities relating to the privacy, security, and transmission of certain individually identifiable health information, known as protected health information. Among other things, HITECH, through its implementing regulations, makes HIPAA’s security standards and certain privacy standards directly applicable to business associates, defined as a person or organization, other than a member of a covered entity’s workforce, that creates, receives, maintains, or transmits protected health information on behalf of a covered entity for a function or activity regulated by HIPAA. HITECH also strengthened the civil and criminal penalties that may be imposed against covered entities, business associates, and individuals, and gave state attorneys general new authority to file civil actions for damages or injunctions in federal courts to enforce the federal HIPAA laws and seek attorneys’ fees and costs associated with pursuing federal civil actions. In addition, other federal and state laws may govern the privacy and security of health and other information in certain circumstances, many of which differ from each other in significant ways and may not be pre-empted by HIPAA, thus complicating compliance efforts.
Many states have also adopted laws similar to each of the above federal laws, which may be broader in scope and apply to items or services reimbursed by any third-party payor, including commercial insurers. Certain states also require implementation of commercial compliance programs and compliance with the medical device industry’s voluntary compliance guidelines and the applicable compliance guidance promulgated by the federal government, or otherwise restrict payments or the provision of other items of value that may be made to healthcare providers and other potential referral sources; impose restrictions on marketing practices; or require companies to track and report information related to payments, and other items of value to physicians and other healthcare providers.
If our operations are found to be in violation of any of the laws or regulations described above or any other applicable laws, we may be subject to penalties or other enforcement actions, including criminal and significant civil monetary penalties, damages, fines, disgorgement, imprisonment, exclusion from participation in government healthcare programs, corporate integrity agreements, suspension and debarment from government contracts, and refusal of orders under existing government contracts, reputational harm, diminished profits and future earnings, and the curtailment or restructuring of our operations, any of which could adversely affect our ability to operate our business and our results of operations. Enforcement actions can be brought by federal or state governments, or as “qui tam” actions brought by individual whistleblowers in the name of the government under the civil FCA if the violations are alleged to have caused the government to pay a false or fraudulent claim.
To the extent that any of our products are sold in a foreign country, we may be subject to similar foreign laws and regulations, which may include, for instance, applicable post-marketing requirements, including safety surveillance, anti-fraud and abuse laws, and implementation of corporate compliance programs and reporting of payments or transfers of value to healthcare professionals.
Coverage and Reimbursement
The commercial success of our product candidates and our ability to commercialize any approved product candidates successfully will depend in part on the extent to which governmental payor programs at the federal and state levels, including Medicare and Medicaid, private health insurers, and other third-party payors provide coverage for and establish adequate reimbursement levels for our products. Government authorities, private health insurers, and other organizations generally decide which products and services they will pay for and establish reimbursement levels for healthcare. Medicare is a federally funded program managed by CMS through local fiscal intermediaries and carriers that administer coverage and reimbursement for certain healthcare items and services furnished to the elderly and disabled. Medicaid is an insurance program for certain categories of patients whose income and assets fall below state defined levels and who are otherwise uninsured that is both federally and state funded and managed by each state. In the United States, private health insurers and other third-party payors often provide reimbursement for products and services based on the level at which the government provides reimbursement through the Medicare or Medicaid programs for such products and services.
In the United States, the European Union, and other potentially significant markets for our products, government authorities and third-party payors are increasingly attempting to limit or regulate the price of medical products and services, particularly for new and innovative products and therapies, which often has resulted in average selling prices lower than they would otherwise be. In the United States, it is also common for certain government and private health plans to use coverage determinations to leverage rebates from labelers to reduce the plans’ net costs. These restrictions and limitations influence the purchase of healthcare services and products and lower the realization on manufacturers’ sales of products. Third-party payors are developing increasingly sophisticated methods of controlling healthcare costs. Third-party payors may limit coverage to specific therapeutic products on an approved list, or formulary, which might not include all of the FDA-approved products for a particular indication or might impose high co-payment amounts to influence patient choice. Third-party payors also control costs by requiring prior authorization or imposing other restrictions. Third-party payors are increasingly challenging the price and examining the medical necessity and cost-effectiveness of medical products and services, in addition to their safety and efficacy.
Federal programs also impose price controls through mandatory ceiling prices on purchases by federal agencies and federally funded hospitals and clinics. These restrictions and limitations influence the purchase of healthcare services and products. Legislative proposals to reform healthcare or reduce costs under government programs may result in lower reimbursement for our products or exclusion of our products.
Private payors often rely on the lead of the governmental payors in rendering coverage and reimbursement determinations. Therefore, achieving favorable CMS coverage and reimbursement is usually a significant gating issue for successful introduction of a new product.
Further, the increased emphasis on managed healthcare in the United States and on country and regional pricing and reimbursement controls in the European Union will put additional pressure on product pricing, reimbursement, and utilization, which may adversely affect our future product sales and results of operations. These pressures can arise from rules and practices of managed care groups, competition from other products, judicial decisions and governmental laws and regulations related to Medicare, Medicaid, and healthcare reform, and pricing in general. Patients who are prescribed treatments for their conditions and providers performing the prescribed services generally rely on third-party payors to reimburse all or part of the associated healthcare costs. Sales of our product candidates will therefore depend substantially, both domestically and abroad, on the extent to which the costs of our products will be paid by health maintenance, managed care, and similar healthcare management organizations, or reimbursed by government health administration authorities, such as Medicare and Medicaid, private health insurers, and other third-party payors.
Moreover, a payor’s decision to provide coverage for a product does not imply that an adequate reimbursement rate will be approved or that significant price concessions will not be required to avoid restrictive conditions. High health plan co-payment requirements may result in patients seeking alternative therapies. Adequate third-party reimbursement may not be available to enable us to maintain price levels sufficient to realize an appropriate return on our investment. Legislative proposals to reform healthcare or reduce costs under government insurance programs may result in lower reimbursement for our products or exclusion of our products from coverage. The cost containment measures that healthcare payors and providers are instituting and any healthcare reform could significantly reduce our revenue from the sale of any approved product candidates.
Healthcare Reform Measures
The United States and many foreign jurisdictions have enacted or proposed legislative and regulatory changes affecting the healthcare system. The United States government, state legislatures and foreign governments also have shown significant interest in implementing cost-containment programs to limit the growth of government-paid healthcare costs, including price controls, restrictions on reimbursement and requirements for substitution of generic products for branded prescription drugs.
The ACA substantially changed the way healthcare is financed by both governmental and private insurers, and significantly impacts the pharmaceutical industry. The ACA is intended to broaden access to health insurance, reduce or constrain the growth of healthcare spending, enhance remedies against healthcare fraud and abuse, add new transparency requirements for healthcare and health insurance industries, impose new taxes and fees on pharmaceutical and medical device manufacturers, and impose additional health policy reforms.
The ACA has been subject to challenges in the courts. In the most recent judicial challenge to the ACA, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled on June 17, 2021 that the plaintiffs lacked standing to challenge the law as they had not alleged personal injury traceable to the allegedly unlawful conduct. As a result, the Supreme Court did not rule on the constitutionality of the ACA or any of its provisions.
The Budget Control Act of 2011, among other things, created the Joint Select Committee on Deficit Reduction to recommend proposals in spending reductions to Congress. The Joint Select Committee did not achieve its targeted deficit reduction of an amount greater than $1.2 trillion for the fiscal years 2012 through 2021, triggering the legislation’s automatic reductions to several government programs. These reductions included aggregate reductions to Medicare payments to healthcare providers of up to 2.0% per fiscal year. The Bipartisan Budget Act of 2018 retained the federal budget “sequestration” Medicare payment reductions of 2% and extended it through 2031. Under the Consolidated Appropriations Acts of 2023 and 2024, the Medicare sequester percentage in FY2032 is scheduled to be 2% from April 1, 2032, through September 30, 2032, and 0% for October 1, 2032 through March 31, 2032 unless congressional action is taken. On January 2, 2013, the American Taxpayer Relief Act was signed into law, which, among other things, reduced Medicare payments to several types of providers, including hospitals, imaging centers and cancer treatment centers, and increased the statute of limitations period for the government to recover overpayments to providers from three to five years.
Further legislative and regulatory changes remain possible. It is unknown what form any such changes or any law would take, and how or whether it may affect our business in the future. We expect that changes or additions to the Medicare and Medicaid programs, and changes stemming from other healthcare reform measures, especially with regard to healthcare access, financing or other legislation in individual states, could have a material adverse effect on the healthcare industry.
At the state level, legislatures may also increasingly pass legislation and implement regulations designed to control product pricing, including price or patient reimbursement constraints, discounts, restrictions on certain product access and marketing cost disclosure and transparency measures.
We expect that additional federal, state, and foreign healthcare reform measures will be adopted in the future, any of which could limit the amounts that federal and state governments will pay for healthcare products and services, which could result in limited coverage and reimbursement and reduced demand for our products, or additional pricing pressures.
Environmental Matters
We are subject to various environmental, health and safety laws and regulations, including those governing air emissions, water and wastewater discharges, noise emissions, the use, transport, management and disposal of chemicals and hazardous materials and wastes, the import, export and registration of chemicals, and the cleanup of contaminated sites. Based on information currently available to us, we do not expect environmental or health and safety costs and contingencies to have a material adverse effect on us. The operation of our business and facilities, however, entails risks in these areas. Significant expenditures could be required in the future to comply with environmental or health and safety laws, regulations, or requirements.
In Israel, where our contract manufacturer produces our ReWalk products, businesses storing or using certain hazardous materials (including materials necessary for our manufacturing process) are required, pursuant to the Israeli Dangerous Substances Law, 5753-1993, to obtain a toxin permit from the Ministry of Environmental Protection. In the U.S., where we manufacture our AlterG products in our Fremont, California facility, we do not utilize chemicals which require a toxic materials license. We have a hazardous waste disposal license with the County of Alameda and dispose of our expired and empty containers through a process in accordance with the license.
In the European marketplace, electrical and electronic equipment and its packaging is required to comply with a number of regulatory regimes aimed at ensuring product safety and protecting the environment, including the Directive on Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment, which aims to prevent waste by encouraging reuse and recycling, and the Directive on Restriction of Use of Certain Hazardous Substances, which restricts the use of ten hazardous substances in electrical and electronic products. Our products and certain components of such products “placed on the market” in the E.U. (whether or not manufactured in the E.U.) are subject to these and other legislative regimes. Additionally, we are required to comply with certain laws, regulations, and directives, including the Toxic Substances Control Act in the United States and the REACH Regulation in the E.U., governing chemicals. These and similar laws and regulations require the testing, reporting, labelling, and registration of certain chemicals we use and ship. We believe we comply in all material respects with applicable environmental and product conformity laws and regulations.
Manufacturing
Our ReWalk exoskeletons, ReStore exo-suits, and AlterG Anti-Gravity systems include off-the-shelf and custom-made components produced to our specifications by various third parties, for technical and cost-effectiveness. We have contracted with Sanmina Corporation (“Sanmina”) and Cirtronics Corporation (“Cirtronics”), each a well-established contract manufacturer with expertise in the medical device industry, for the manufacture by Sanmina of our SCI Products at its facility in Ma’alot, Israel and, starting in January 2025, by Cirtronics of the AlterG product at its facility in Milford, New Hampshire. Each product line is manufactured pursuant to the same applicable set of specifications. We place our manufacturing orders with Sanmina, Cirtronics and other suppliers pursuant to purchase orders or by providing forecasts for future requirements. We may terminate our relationship with Cirtronics through notice at least one year prior to the expiration of the initial term or renewal term of the contract. We may terminate our relationship with Sanmina or our other suppliers at any time upon written notice. Either we, on the one hand, or either Sanmina or Cirtronics, on the other hand, may terminate the respective relationship in the event of a material breach, subject to a 30-day cure period in the case of Sanmina or a 45-day period in the case of Cirtronics. Each agreement with Sanmina and Cirtronics contains a limitation on liability that applies equally to us and Sanmina and Cirtronics, respectively.
We believe that these contract manufacturing relationships with Sanmina and Cirtronics allow us to operate our business efficiently by focusing our internal efforts on the development and commercialization of our technology and our products and provides us with substantial scale-up capacity. We regularly test quality on-site at each of Sanmina’s and Cirtronics’ facilities and we obtain full quality inspection reports. We maintain a non-disclosure agreement with each of Sanmina and Cirtronics.
We develop certain of the software components internally and license other software components that are generally available for commercial use as open-source software.
We manufacture products based upon internal sales forecasts. We deliver products to customers and distributors based upon purchase orders received, and our goal is to fulfill each customer’s order for products in regular production within two weeks of receipt of the order.
Suppliers
We have contracted with Sanmina for the sourcing of all components and raw materials necessary for the manufacture of our ReWalk products and with Cirtronics for the sourcing of all components and raw materials for the manufacture of our AlterG products, although there are instances that we purchase raw materials ourselves. Components of our products and raw materials come from suppliers in the United States, Europe, China, Taiwan, and Israel, and we depend on certain of these components and raw materials, including certain electronic parts, for the manufacture of our products. To date, we have not experienced significant volatility in the prices of these components and raw materials. However, during the COVID-19 pandemic several specific parts, mainly electronic parts, experienced temporary price increases which have returned to more normal levels. Such prices are subject to a number of factors, including purchase volumes, general economic conditions, currency exchange rates, industry cycles, production levels, and scarcity of supply.
We believe that each of Sanmina’s and Cirtronics’ facilities, our contracted manufacturing arrangements, and our supply arrangements are sufficient to support our potential capacity needs for the foreseeable future.
Human Capital
Employees
As of December 31, 2024, we had 80 employees (including full-time and hourly employees), of whom 5 were located in the United States, 18 were located in Israel and 10 were located in Europe. The majority of our employees are, and have been, engaged in sales and marketing activities. We do not employ a significant number of temporary or part time employees.
We are subject to labor laws and regulations within our locations mainly in the U.S., Germany, and Israel. These laws and regulations principally concern matters such as pensions, paid annual vacation, paid sick days, length of the workday and work week, minimum wages, overtime pay, insurance for work-related accidents, severance pay and other conditions of employment. Our employees are not represented by a labor union. We consider our relationship with our employees to be good. To date, we have not experienced any work stoppages.
Compensation and Benefits
We provide our employees with competitive salaries and bonuses, opportunities for equity ownership, and a robust employment package that promotes well-being across all aspects of our employees’ lives, including health care, retirement planning, and paid time off. We also invest in the ongoing development of our employees through our internal training programs.
Diversity and Inclusion
We value the diversity of our employees and take pride in our commitment to diversity and inclusion across all levels of our organizational structure. We encourage a diversity of views and strive to create an equal opportunity workplace, including working with managers to develop strategies for building diverse teams and promoting the advancement of employees from diverse backgrounds.
Financial Information about Geographic Areas and Significant Customer Information
The following table sets forth the geographical breakdown of our revenue for each of the years ended December 31, 2024, and 2023 (in thousands):
Year Ended December 31,
Revenue based on customer’s location:
United States
14,425
7,636
Europe
9,546
5,044
Asia-Pacific
Rest of the world
Total revenue
$
25,663
$
13,854
Additional discussion of financial information by reportable segment and geographic area and sales in excess of 10% of total revenue to certain of our customers is contained in Note 14 to our consolidated financial statements set forth in “Part II. Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” of this annual report.
2024 Recent Developments
•
In March 2025, we announced an agreement for CorLife, to become the exclusive distributor for the ReWalk Personal Exoskeleton for individuals with workers' compensation claims.
•
In March 2025, we expanded our exclusive contract with MYOLYN so that we manage referrals and sales of the MyoCycle Home product for patients that are transitioning from clinical use to home use. This expanded contract builds upon the existing distribution agreement, under which we manage all hospital and clinic-based sales of the MyoCycle Pro product nationwide, as well as home use sales for individuals with Veterans Benefits Administration and workers' compensation benefits.
•
In January 2025, Lifeward completed a registered direct offering priced $2.75 per share for gross proceeds of $5.0 million to fund continuing commercial efforts, working capital, and general corporate purposes.
•
We completed actions to streamline our U.S. operations, including closing two U.S. facilities and reducing our headcount by a cumulative 35% since the AlterG acquisition. The actions are expected to save us approximately $3 million in operating expenses and improve gross margins by approximately two percentage points when the full impact is achieved.
•
We began selling the AlterG product line through our German sales organization, which we expect will result in revenue growth from a more focused sales effort and higher margins with little incremental investment by utilizing our existing sales and support infrastructure in Germany.
•
We completed our near-term plans to refresh our Board of Directors. Joe Turk replaced Jeff Dykan as chairman following Mr. Dykan’s retirement from the Board. Additionally, the Board added Mike Swinford as a new director and Bob Marshall as a new director and chairman of our audit committee.
•
We formally changed our name to Lifeward Ltd. from ReWalk Robotics Ltd. to complete the rebranding of the Company and reflect our expanded mission to transform the lives of people with physical limitations or disabilities.
•
We successfully launched the latest generation of Differential Air Pressure Anti-Gravity Technology with our new NEO product line. The NEO was engineered with a new design to allow a lower price point to make the technology more accessible to a broader range of customers. Since the introduction of the NEO at the end of June 2024, we have generated orders for approximately 100 units, as the NEO is quickly becoming a growth driver for the AlterG product line.
•
We completed our FDA submission for our 7th generation ReWalk design, which will further enhance use of the system in all aspects of daily life and further establish us as the most advanced personal exoskeleton company in the world.
•
The CMS Home Health Rule and Medicare Pricing achieved by our efforts is in effect with a growing volume of claims approvals and payments from our 2024 Medicare submissions.

---

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
ITEM 1A . RISK FACTORS
Our business faces significant risks. You should carefully consider all of the information set forth in this annual report and in our other filings with the SEC, including the following risk factors which we face and which are faced by our industry. Our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected by any of these risks. In that event, the trading price of our ordinary shares would likely decline and you might lose all or part of your investment. This report also contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Our results could materially differ from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements, as a result of certain factors including the risks described below and elsewhere in this report and our other SEC filings. See also “Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” on page (ii).
Risks Related to Our Business and Our Industry
We have concluded that there is substantial doubt as to our ability to continue as a going concern.
As of December 31, 2024, we had an accumulated deficit in the total amount of approximately $264.8 million and anticipate further losses in the development of our business. Those factors raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. Our ability to continue as a going concern depends upon our obtaining the necessary financing to meet our obligations and timely repay our liabilities arising from normal business operations. The financial statements have been prepared assuming that we will continue to operate as a going concern, which contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. Management concluded that substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern exists as of the date of the issuance of these financial statements. Our auditors also included an explanatory paragraph to their audit opinion relating to our accompanying consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024 regarding the substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. If we are unable to secure additional capital, we may be required to take additional measures to reduce costs in order to conserve our cash in amounts sufficient to sustain operations and meet our obligations. If we become insolvent, investors in our securities may lose the entire value of their investment in our business. The accompanying financial statements do not include any adjustments that may be necessary should we be unable to continue as a going concern, and it is not possible for us to predict at this time the potential success of our business.
We may fail to realize the benefits expected from our acquisition of AlterG, which could adversely affect the price of our ordinary shares.
As discussed above in “Part I. Item 1. Business - Overview”, on August 11, 2023, we completed the acquisition of AlterG which became an indirect and wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company.
The anticipated benefits from our acquisition of AlterG are based on projections and assumptions about the combined businesses of ReWalk and AlterG, which may not materialize as expected or which may prove to be inaccurate. The value of our ordinary shares could be adversely affected if we are unable to realize the anticipated benefits from the acquisition on a timely basis or at all. Achieving the benefits of the acquisition will depend, in part, on our ability to integrate the business, operations and products of AlterG successfully and efficiently with our business. The process of integrating the operations of ReWalk and AlterG could encounter unexpected costs and delays, which include: the loss of key personnel; the loss of key customers; the loss of key suppliers; inability to properly identify, acquire or obtained required regulatory approvals; and unanticipated issues in integrating sales, marketing and administrative functions. In addition, the acquired AlterG business, products and technologies may not achieve anticipated revenues and income growth.
Further, the integration of AlterG may involve a number of additional risks, including diversion of management’s attention away from the rest of the business, which could adversely affect our results of operations. In addition, our failure to identify or accurately assess the magnitude of certain liabilities we assumed in the acquisition could result in unexpected litigation or regulatory exposure, unfavorable accounting charges, unexpected increases in taxes due, a loss of anticipated tax benefits or other adverse effects on our business, operating results or financial condition. If we do not realize the expected benefits or synergies of the acquisition, such as revenue gains or cost reductions, there could be a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, and financial condition.
Global, regional, and local economic weakness and uncertainty could adversely affect our demand for our products and services and our business and financial performance.
Our business and financial performance depends on worldwide economic conditions and the demand for our products and services in the markets in which we compete. Ongoing economic weakness, including an economic slowdown or recession, uncertainty in markets throughout the world and other adverse economic conditions, including inflation, changes in monetary policy and interest rate fluctuations, have resulted, and may result in the future, in decreased demand for our products and services and increased expenses and difficulty in managing inventory levels and accurately forecasting revenue, gross margin, cash flows and expenses. Ongoing U.S. federal government spending limits may continue to reduce demand for our products and services from organizations that receive funding from the U.S. government and could negatively affect macroeconomic conditions in the United States, which could further reduce demand for our products and services.
Prolonged or more severe economic weakness and uncertainty could also cause our expenses to vary materially from our expectations. Any financial turmoil affecting the banking system and financial markets or any significant financial services institution failures could negatively impact our treasury operations, as the financial condition of such parties may deteriorate rapidly and without notice. Poor financial performance of asset markets and the adverse effects of fluctuating currency exchange rates could lead to higher pension and post-retirement benefit expenses. Interest and other expenses could vary materially from expectations depending on changes in interest rates, borrowing costs, currency exchange rates, costs of hedging activities and the fair value of derivative instruments. Economic downturns also may lead to future restructuring actions and associated expenses.
We may not have sufficient funds to meet certain future operating needs or capital requirements, which could impair our efforts to develop and commercialize existing and new products, and as a result, we may in the future consider one or more capital-raising transactions, including future equity or debt financings, strategic transactions, or borrowings which may also further dilute our shareholders or place us under restrictive covenants limiting our ability to operate freely.
We intend to finance our business by close management of our operating expenses until we reach profitable operation using existing cash on hand, issuances of equity and/or debt securities, and other future public or private issuances of securities, cash exercised of outstanding warrants, or through a combination of the foregoing, though we may also consider additional capital raising alternatives, such as entering into a credit facility, if the foregoing alternatives are not available to us or unavailable on reasonable terms. We had cash and cash equivalents of $6.7 million as of December 31, 2024, and raised approximately $5.0 million in January 2025 through a registered direct offering of our ordinary shares. However, we will need to seek additional sources of financing if we require more funds than anticipated during the next 12 months or in later periods.
Raising additional capital in the public markets could also entail certain downsides. Although we are currently eligible to use our Form S-3, we are limited to selling no more than one-third of our unaffiliated market capitalization, or public float, on Form S-3 in a 12-month period unless our public float rises above $75 million. During the twelve-month period ended March 7, 2025, we had sold a total of $5.0 million in offerings pursuant to shelf registration statements which will limit our capacity to sell our ordinary shares under our current shelf registration statement. For more information on our inability to use Form S-3, see “Part II. Item 2, Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations-Liquidity and Capital Resources-Equity Raises” below. Additionally, due to these limitations on our use of Form S-3, we may be required to seek other methods for access to capital, such as a registration statement on Form S-1. The preparation of a registration statement on Form S-1 is, and has in the past, been more time-consuming and costly than using Form S-3. We may also conduct fundraising transactions in the form of private placements, potentially with registration rights or priced at a discount to the market value of our ordinary shares, which could require shareholder approval under the rules of The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC (“Nasdaq”), or other equity raise transactions such as equity lines of credit. In addition to entailing increased capital costs, any such transactions have historically resulted in and could result in substantial dilution of our shareholders’ interests and may also transfer control to a new investor or diminish the value of an investment in our ordinary shares.
We may also need to pursue strategic transactions, such as joint ventures, in-licensing transactions, or the sale of our business, or all, or substantially all, of our assets if our financial stability is uncertain, and we are unable to raise additional capital effectively. These strategic transactions have in the past and could in the future require significant management attention, disrupt our business, adversely affect our financial results, be unsuccessful or fail to achieve the desired results.
Overall, if we cannot raise the required funds, or cannot raise them on terms acceptable to us or investors, we may be forced to curtail substantially our current operations or cease operations altogether. Further, external perceptions regarding our ability to continue as a going concern may make it more difficult for us to obtain financing for the continuation of our operations or require us to obtain financing on terms that are more favorable to investors, and could result in the loss of confidence by investors and suppliers. As such, our failure to continue as a going concern could harm our business, operating results and financial position and severely affect the value of your investment.
We may not fully realize the anticipated positive impacts to future financial results from our streamlining efforts.
We began streamlining our U.S. operations, including closing two U.S. facilities to complete the integration following the acquisition of AlterG. As a result of the organizational changes, we reduced our total headcount by greater than 35% since the closing of the AlterG acquisition. Key functions located at the affected facilities were integrated into the operations of the Marlborough, Massachusetts facility, and manufacturing of the AlterG Anti-Gravity Systems was assumed by Cirtronics Corporation, a nationally recognized contract manufacturer specializing in the manufacture of precision medical devices and instrumentation. We estimate that such consolidation will save our company approximately $3 million in operating expenses and improve gross margins when the full impact is achieved, which we expect to contribute to our goal of reducing costs and achieving profitability. Our ability to achieve the anticipated cost savings and other benefits from such streamlining efforts is subject to many estimates and assumptions and may vary materially based on factors such as market conditions and the effect of our streamlining efforts on our work force. These estimates and assumptions are subject to significant economic, competitive and other uncertainties, some of which are beyond our control. We cannot assure that we will fully realize the anticipated positive impacts to future financial results from our current or future streamlining efforts. If our estimates and assumptions are incorrect or if other unforeseen events occur, we may not achieve the cost savings expected from such streamlining, and our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected.
We face economic and political risks associated with doing business in Taiwan, particularly due to the geopolitical tension between Taiwan and China, and in Russia that could negatively affect our business and hence the value of your investment.
Currently, we rely on third party suppliers in Taiwan for a portion of the components we use in our AlterG products. Accordingly, our business, financial condition and results of operations and the market price of our securities may be affected by changes in governmental policies, taxation, growth rate, inflation rate or interest rates and by social instability and diplomatic and social developments in or affecting Taiwan. In particular, the unique political status of Taiwan and its internal political movement cause sustained tension between China and Taiwan. Past developments related to the interactions between China and Taiwan, especially in relation to trade activities such as bans on exports of goods from time to time, have on occasions depressed the transactions and business operations of certain Taiwanese companies and overall economic environment. We cannot predict whether there will be escalation of the tensions between China and Taiwan, which would lead to new bans or tariffs on exports or even conflict. Any conflict which threatens the military, political or economic stability in Taiwan could have a material adverse effect on our current or future business and financial conditions and results of operations.
In addition, we also sell our AlterG products to a distributor in Russia. The current invasion of Ukraine by Russia has escalated tensions among the United States, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (“NATO”) and Russia. The United States and other NATO member states, as well as non-member states, have announced sanctions against Russia and certain Russian banks, enterprises and individuals. AlterG prior to the acquisition, and Lifeward subsequent to the acquisition, has remained in compliance with these sanctions by obtaining export licenses for each shipment to our distributor that serves Russia. These and any future additional sanctions and any resulting conflict between Russia, the United States and NATO countries could have an adverse impact on our current operations.
Further, such invasion, ongoing military conflict, resulting sanctions and related countermeasures by NATO states, the United States and other countries are likely to lead to market disruptions, including significant volatility in commodity prices, credit and capital markets, as well as supply chain interruptions for equipment, which could have an adverse impact on our operations and financial performance.
If we fail to meet the requirements for continued listing on the Nasdaq Capital Market, our ordinary shares could be delisted from trading, which would decrease the liquidity of our ordinary shares and our ability to raise additional capital.
In the past, we have received deficiency letters from Nasdaq as a consequence of our failure to satisfy Nasdaq’s continued listing requirements. Although we have been able to regain compliance with the listing requirements within the manner and time periods prescribed by Nasdaq in the past, there can be no assurance that we will be able to maintain compliance with the Nasdaq continued listing requirements in the future or regain compliance with respect to any future deficiencies. If we fail to maintain compliance with the applicable continued listing requirements in the future and Nasdaq determines to delist our ordinary shares, the delisting could adversely affect the market price and liquidity of our ordinary shares, reduce our ability to raise additional capital and result in operational challenges and damage to investor relations and market reputation.
Any delisting determination could seriously decrease or eliminate the value of an investment in our ordinary shares and other securities linked to our ordinary shares. While an alternative listing on an over-the-counter exchange could maintain some degree of a market in our ordinary shares, we could face substantial material adverse consequences, including, but not limited to, the following: limited availability for market quotations for our ordinary shares; reduced liquidity with respect to our ordinary shares; a determination that our ordinary shares are “penny stock” under SEC rules, subjecting brokers trading our ordinary shares to more stringent rules on disclosure and the class of investors to which the broker may sell the ordinary shares; limited news and analyst coverage, in part due to the “penny stock” rules; decreased ability to issue additional securities or obtain additional financing in the future; and potential breaches under or terminations of our agreements with current or prospective large shareholders, strategic investors and banks. The perception among investors that we are at heightened risk of delisting could also negatively affect the market price of our securities and trading volume of our ordinary shares.
Our future growth and operating results will depend on our ability to develop, receive regulatory clearance for and commercialize new products and penetrate new product and geographic markets.
We are currently engaged in research and development efforts to address the needs of patients with mobility impairments besides paraplegia, such as stroke, and, in the future, we may engage in efforts to address these needs in patients with other conditions such as multiple sclerosis, cerebral palsy, Parkinson’s disease and elderly assistance. In 2019, we commercialized our first product for stroke patients, the ReStore Exo-Suit. We continue to sell the ReStore in the US but ceased sales in the EU in May 2024. For more information, see “Part, Item 1. Business-ReStore Products” above. While our Collaboration Agreement with Harvard for the design, research and develop lightweight exoskeleton system technologies for lower limb disabilities intended to treat stroke, multiple sclerosis, mobility limitations for the elderly and other medical applications successfully concluded on March 31, 2022, Harvard has licensed to us certain of its intellectual property relating to lightweight exoskeleton system technologies for lower limb disabilities. We are obligated to use commercially reasonable efforts to develop products under the license in accordance with an agreed-upon development plan and to introduce and market such products commercially.
We expect that a portion of our revenue will be derived, in the next few years, from the ReStore Exo-Suit product, other new products utilizing DAP, and, in later years, if we choose to advance the current designs, from other potential new products, such as ReBoot, a home use device for stroke patients, or new products aimed at addressing other medical indications which affect the ability to walk, including multiple sclerosis, cerebral palsy, Parkinson’s disease and elderly assistance. As such, our future results will depend on our ability to successfully develop and commercialize such new products and to penetrate our targeted markets with our existing ReStore product in larger scale than we have done to date. We cannot ensure that we will be able to introduce new products, products currently under development or products contemplated for future development for additional indications in a timely manner, or at all, as it depends on our available resources to fund such projects, as well as our ability to conduct clinical trials and testing. While we received governmental clearance to market our ReStore product on the anticipated timetable in 2019, obtaining clearance for any other products we may develop could be an extensive, costly, and time-consuming process, which could delay any planned commercialization timelines. For more information on the clearance processes for our products, see “Part I, Item 1. Business-Government Regulation” above.
Harvard may terminate its License Agreement with us if we fail to maintain the requisite insurance or become insolvent. Any such termination of this aspect of the collaboration with Harvard could impair our research and development efforts into lightweight soft suit exoskeleton system technologies for lower limb disabilities such as the ReBoot device which is intended to be used at home by people who suffered a stroke. In addition, we may not be able to clinically demonstrate the medical benefits of our products for new indications. We have limited clinical data demonstrating the benefits of our products and we might not be able to support the economic benefits our products have for our potential customers. We may also be unable to gain necessary regulatory clearances or approvals to enable us to market new products for additional indications or the regulatory process may be more costly and time-consuming than expected, which could adversely impact us given our cash position and ongoing capital requirements.
Even if we are successful in the design and development of new products, our growth and results of operations will depend on our ability to penetrate new markets and gain acceptance and reimbursement coverage in non-SCI markets such as the stroke rehabilitation market, and, in the longer term, the home use device market for stroke-caused lower limb disability, multiple sclerosis, elderly assistance and cerebral palsy patients. We may not be able to gain such market acceptance and coverage for these indications in a timely manner, or at all.
While our new products currently under development will share some aspects of the core technology platform of our current products, their design features and components may differ from our current products. Accordingly, these products will also be subject to the risks described in the risk factor immediately below entitled “We rely on sales of our ReWalk Personal Exoskeletons, AlterG Anti-Gravity systems, and ReStore Exo-Suits and related service contracts and extended warranties for our revenue. We may not be able to achieve or maintain market acceptance of our ReWalk, AlterG, or ReStore products, or to generate sufficient revenue from these current and future products to sustain our operations.” To the extent we are unable to successfully develop and commercialize products beyond our existing commercial product portfolio, we will not meet our operating and financial objectives.
We rely on sales of our ReWalk Personal Exoskeletons, AlterG Anti-Gravity systems, and MyoCycle FES cycles and related service contracts and extended warranties for our revenue. We may not be able to achieve or maintain market acceptance of our ReWalk, AlterG, or MyoCycle products or to generate sufficient revenue from these current and future products to sustain our operations.
We currently rely, and expect in the future to rely, on sales of our ReWalk Personal Exoskeletons, AlterG Anti-Gravity systems, MyoCycle FES cycles, and related consumables, services, and extended warranties for our revenue. We began marketing the ReStore lightweight soft exo-suit in 2019 in the United States and the E.U. (following the receipt of FDA clearance and CE mark ) to support mobility for individuals suffering from other lower limb disabilities. We ceased sales of the ReStore in the EU in May 2024. Several factors could negatively affect our ability to achieve and maintain market acceptance of our ReWalk, AlterG, or ReStore systems, which could in turn materially impair our business, financial condition, and operating results, as follows:
•
ReWalk. We have sold a limited number of ReWalk systems, and market acceptance and adoption depend on educating people with limited upright mobility and health care providers as to the distinct features, ease-of-use, positive lifestyle impact, and other benefits of ReWalk compared to alternative technologies. ReWalk may not be perceived to have sufficient potential benefits compared with these alternatives. Users may also choose other alternatives due to disadvantages of ReWalk, including the time it takes for a user to put on the device, the slower pace of ReWalk compared to a wheelchair, the weight of ReWalk when carried, which makes it more burdensome for a companion to transport than a wheelchair, the required training, and the requirement that users be accompanied by a trained companion. Also, we believe that healthcare providers tend to be slow to change their medical treatment practices because of perceived liability risks arising from the use of new products and the uncertainty of third-party reimbursement. Accordingly, healthcare providers may not recommend ReWalk until there is sufficient support for the device to convince them to alter the treatment methods they typically recommend, such as expanded reimbursement coverage by payors, and/or recommendations by prominent healthcare providers or other key opinion leaders in the spinal cord injury community that ReWalk is effective in providing identifiable immediate and long-term health benefits.
In the United States, many private third-party payors use coverage decisions and payment amounts determined by CMS as guidelines in setting their coverage and reimbursement policies. In July 2020, CMS issued a Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System Level II Code for ReWalk Personal Exoskeleton. These codes are used to identify medical products and supplies and to facilitate insurance claim submissions and processing for these items. On November 1, 2023, CMS issued Calendar Year 2024 Home Health Prospective Payment System Rule CMS-1780, which explicitly included exoskeletons within a Medicare brace benefit category. The rule went into effect on January 1, 2024. However, even with a positive coverage and reimbursement response from CMS regarding a product of ours, future action by CMS or other government agencies may diminish possible payments to clinicians, outpatient centers and/or hospitals that provide training to the patients so that they can operate the ReWalk Personal Exoskeletons satisfactorily before they take them home, which would discourage access to training sites to prospective users of ReWalk Personal Exoskeletons. Additionally, any decision by CMS regarding reimbursement could influence other payors, including private insurers. If CMS declines to provide for reimbursements of our products, or if its reimbursement price is lower than that of other payors, our products may not be reimbursed at a cost-effective level or at all. Those private third-party payors that do not follow the Medicare guidelines may adopt different coverage and reimbursement policies for purchase of our products or their use in a hospital or rehabilitative setting. In addition, we expect that the purchase of ReWalk Rehabilitation Exoskeleton systems and the ReStore system, as it is currently being sold for use in rehabilitative settings, will require the approval of senior management at hospitals or rehabilitation facilities, inclusion in the hospitals’ or rehabilitation facilities’ budget process for capital expenditures, and in the case of ReWalk Personal Exoskeleton, fundraising, and financial planning or assistance.
•
AlterG. The AlterG Anti-Gravity system has broad clinical utility for treating a wide variety of lower extremity conditions where partial displacement of a patient’s weight can enable exercise which facilitates healing and recovery of improved function. The potential of the AlterG Anti-Gravity systems to achieve greater penetration of the addressable market of rehabilitation hospitals, clinics, and sports medicine practices will depend upon the continued expansion of conditions for which clinicians utilize the AlterG and the ability for greater numbers of these facilities to afford the initial capital outlay for these devices. In 2024 we introduced the AlterG NEO, a new, lower-cost AlterG system, which we believe is more affordable for smaller, independent rehabilitation clinics. However, there can be no assurance that the introduction of this product can expand the size of the addressable market or will not reduce the sales of the existing, higher-priced models.
•
ReStore. The ReStore system is designed to provide advantages to stroke rehabilitation clinics and therapists as compared to other traditional therapies and devices by minimizing setup time, improving patients’ clinical results during therapy, supplying real-time analytics to optimize session productivity, and generating ongoing data reports to assist with tracking patient progress Since the ReStore device is currently only indicated for use in the rehabilitative clinical setting, its market reception will depend heavily on our ability to demonstrate to clinics and therapists the systemic and economic benefits of using the ReStore device, its clinical advantage when compared to other devices or manual therapy, the functionality of the device for a significant portion of the patients that they treat and the overall advantages that the device provides to their patients compared to other technologies. Because the ReStore system is only indicated for use in a clinical setting and we received FDA approval and CE mark in 2019 (as discussed above, we are no longer selling the ReStore in the EU), close in time to the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, the overall sales of the system have been lower than originally anticipated, as many healthcare providers and rehabilitation centers have shifted focus from the clinical setting to at-home therapies and are generally less open for introduction of new technologies such as the ReStore.
As a general matter, achieving and maintaining market acceptance of our current or future products could be negatively impacted by many other factors, including, but not limited to the following: contribution to death or serious injury or malfunction, results of clinical studies relating to our or similar products; claims that our products, or any of their components, infringe on patent or other intellectual property rights of third parties; our ability to support financially and leverage our sales, marketing and training infrastructure, as well as our level of research and development efforts; our ability to enhance and broaden our research and development efforts and product offerings in response to the evolving demands of people with paraplegia and lower limb disability and healthcare providers; our estimates regarding our current or future addressable market; perceived risks associated with the use of our products or similar products or technologies; the introduction of new competitive products or greater acceptance of competitive products; adverse regulatory or legal actions relating to our products or similar products or technologies; and problems arising from the outsourcing of our manufacturing capabilities, or our existing manufacturing and supply relationships. Any or all of these factors could materially and negatively impact our business, financial condition and operating results.
The market for medical exoskeletons, including soft suit devices, remains relatively new and unproven, and important assumptions about the potential market for our current and future products may be inaccurate.
The market for medical exoskeletons, including lightweight exo-suit devices, remains relatively new and unproven. Accordingly, it is difficult to predict the future size and rate of growth of the market. We cannot be certain whether the market will continue to develop or if medical exoskeletons will achieve and sustain a level of market acceptance and demand sufficient for us to continue to generate revenue and achieve profitability.
We obtained FDA de novo authorization for our ReWalk Personal Exoskeleton device in June 2014. FDA subsequently cleared 510(k) premarket notifications for modifications to the ReWalk, including for use of the ReWalk on curbs and stairs. This marketing authorization permits us to market the device for use by individuals with spinal cord injury at levels T7 to L5 and for use by individuals in rehabilitation institutions with spinal cord injury at levels T4 to T6. We obtained FDA clearance for our ReStore system in June 2019. This clearance permits us to market the device to be used to assist ambulatory functions in rehabilitation institutions under supervision of a trained therapist for people with hemiplegia or hemiparesis due to stroke who can ambulate at least 1.5 meters (5 feet) with no more than minimal to moderate levels of assistance.
Future products for those with paraplegia or other mobility impairments or spinal cord injuries may have the same or other restrictions.
Our business strategy is based, in part, on our estimates of the number of individuals with physical limitations and disability and considers the occurrence of spinal cord injuries, strokes, lower-extremity orthopedic injury or surgery, neurological disease, and obesity in our target markets, and the percentage of those groups that would be able to use our current and future products. Limited sources exist to obtain reliable market data with respect to the number of mobility-impaired individuals and the incurrence of spinal cord injuries and strokes in our target markets. In addition, there are no third-party reports or studies regarding what percentage of those with limited mobility and/or spinal cord injuries would be able to use exoskeletons, in general, or our current or planned future products, in particular. Our assumptions may be inaccurate and may change.
The NSCISC estimates according to its 2024 SCI Data Sheet that there are 305,000 people in the United States living with SCI, with an annual incidence of approximately 18,000 new cases per year. Based on information from the 2023 annual report published by the NSCISC, 40% of the total U.S. population of SCI patients suffered injuries between levels T4 and L5. Four published ReWalk trials with respect to such eligible SCI patients had an aggregate screening acceptance rate of 50% considering all current FDA limitations, resulting in an estimated 20% of the total population of SCI patients being qualified candidates for current ReWalk products under its medical labeling criteria. There may be other permanent or short-term factors that affect the market size such as the ability to participate in the training program, the ability to use the device in the user’s current home environment as well as available companion support. With regards to our ReStore product for stroke rehabilitation, as the indication of use is currently in rehabilitation clinics our target market is based on the number of current and future clinics who treat stroke patients. Although there are thousands of inpatient, outpatient and rehabilitation clinics providing therapy in the U.S. for example, we currently see that only a limited portion of the clinics have decided to include ReStore in their stroke rehab program. For more information on our expectations regarding these plans, see “-Our future growth and operating results will depend on our ability to develop, receive regulatory clearance for and commercialize new products and penetrate new product and geographic markets” below. For more information regarding the potential market for future products, including our lightweight soft suit exoskeleton, see “Part I, Item 1. Business-ReWalk Personal and ReWalk Rehabilitation Products-Market Opportunity” above.
We cannot assure you that our estimate regarding our current products is accurate or that our estimate regarding future products will remain the same. FDA or CE mark clearance for such products, if received at all, may contain different limitations from the ones the FDA or E.U. has placed on the devices we currently market for paraplegia. If our estimates of our current or future addressable market are incorrect, our business may not develop as we expect, and the price of our securities may suffer.
We may fail to secure or maintain adequate insurance coverage or reimbursement for our products by third-party payors, which risk may be heightened if insurers find the products to be investigational or experimental or if new government regulations change existing reimbursement policies. Additionally, such coverage or reimbursement, even if maintained, may not produce revenue that are high enough to allow us to sell our products profitably.
We expect that in the future a significant source of payment for ReWalk systems will be private insurance plans and managed care programs, government programs such as Medicare, the VHA, workers’ compensation plans, and other third-party payors.
In December 2015, the VHA issued a national reimbursement policy for the ReWalk system, which entails the evaluation, training and procurement of ReWalk Personal Exoskeleton systems for all qualifying veterans across the United States. Additionally, in September 2017, BARMER signed a confirmation and letter of agreement regarding the provision of ReWalk systems for all qualifying beneficiaries and the German national social accident insurance provider DGUV indicated that its member payors will approve the supply of exoskeleton systems for qualifying beneficiaries on a case-by-case basis. In February 2025, we finalized an agreement with BARMER to formalize the reimbursement process for the provision of ReWalk exoskeletons to medically eligible beneficiaries. However, no broad uniform policy of coverage and reimbursement for electronic exoskeleton medical technology exists among third-party payors in the United States, although reimbursement may be achieved on a case-by-case basis. To date, payments for our products, which are largely for our ReWalk systems, have been made primarily through case-by-case determinations by third-party payors (including several private insurers in the United States), by self-payors and, to a lesser extent, through the use of funds from insurance and/or accident settlements.
Generally, private insurance companies in the United States do not cover or provide reimbursement for any medical exoskeleton products for personal use, including ReWalk Personal Exoskeleton, and may ultimately provide no coverage at all. Additionally, there is limited clinical data related to the ReWalk and ReStore systems, and third-party payors may consider use of them to be experimental and therefore refuse to cover any or all of them. Additionally, the majority of independent medical review decisions to date made following the denial of ReWalk coverage have determined that ReWalk is experimental and/or investigational, citing a lack of clinical data.
As described above, in the United States, many private third-party payors use coverage decisions and payment amounts determined by CMS as guidelines in setting their coverage and reimbursement policies. On November 1, 2023, CMS issued Calendar Year 2024 Home Health Prospective Payment System Rule CMS-1780, which explicitly included exoskeletons within a Medicare brace benefit category, effective January 1, 2024. On April 11, 2024, CMS revised its April 2024 DMEPOS Fee Schedule to include a final lump-sum Medicare purchase fee schedule amount for personal exoskeletons (HCPCS code K1007) with an established rate of $91,032. The final payment determination was made by CMS by applying a “gap filling” process, which was used in light of CMS determining that the code describing the technology has no fee schedule pricing history and that lower extremity exoskeletons incorporate “revolutionary features” that cannot be described by or considered comparable to any other existing code or combination of codes. As part of gap-filling, CMS utilizes verifiable supplier or commercial pricing information and adjusts this pricing information according to a deflation and update factor methodology. In applying this formula to the K1007 code describing the ReWalk Personal Exoskeleton, CMS says that it calculated this final payment amount by averaging pricing information for exoskeleton devices from Lifeward and other manufacturers.
However, even with a positive coverage and reimbursement response from CMS regarding a product of ours, future action by CMS or other government agencies may diminish possible payments to physicians, outpatient centers and/or hospitals that purchase our products for use by their patients and possible payments to individuals who purchase the ReWalk Personal Exoskeleton for their own use. Additionally, a decision by CMS to provide reimbursement could influence other payors, including private insurers. If CMS declines to provide for reimbursements of our products or if its reimbursement price is lower than that of other payors, our products may not be reimbursed at a cost-effective level or at all. Those private third-party payors that do not follow the Medicare guidelines may adopt different coverage and reimbursement policies for purchase of our products or their use in a hospital or rehabilitative setting. In addition, we expect that the purchase of ReWalk Rehabilitation Exoskeleton systems and the ReStore system, as it is currently being sold for use in rehabilitative settings, will require the approval of senior management at hospitals or rehabilitation facilities, inclusion in the hospitals’ or rehabilitation facilities’ budget process for capital expenditures, and in the case of ReWalk Personal Exoskeleton, fundraising, and financial planning or assistance.
Third-party payors are developing increasingly sophisticated methods of controlling healthcare costs. These cost control methods include prospective payment systems, capitated rates, benefit redesigns and an exploration of other cost-effective methods of delivering healthcare. These cost control methods potentially limit the amount that healthcare providers may be willing to pay for electronic exoskeleton medical technology if they provide coverage at all. We may be unable to sell our products on a profitable basis if third-party payors deny coverage or provide insufficient levels of reimbursement.
Future legislation could result in modifications to the existing public and private health care insurance systems that would have a material adverse effect on the reimbursement policies discussed above. If enacted and implemented, any measures to restrict health care spending could result in decreased revenue from our products and decrease potential returns from our research and development initiatives.
Defects in our products or the software that drives them could adversely affect the results of our operations.
The design, manufacture and marketing of our products involve certain inherent risks. Manufacturing or design defects, unanticipated use of ReWalk, ReStore, or AlterG, or inadequate disclosure of risks relating to the use of our products can lead to injury or other adverse events. In addition, because the manufacturing of some of our products is outsourced to Sanmina, the original equipment manufacturer of such products, we may not be aware of manufacturing defects that could occur. Such adverse events could lead to recalls or safety alerts relating to those products (either voluntary or required by the FDA or similar governmental authorities in other countries), and could result, in certain cases, in the removal of our products from the market. A recall could result in significant costs. To the extent any manufacturing defect occurs, our agreement with Sanmina contains a limitation on Sanmina’s liability, and therefore we could be required to incur the majority of related costs. Product defects or recalls could also result in our inability to profitably grow our business due to parts shortages, increased field service demand, and inventory shortages, and the resulting negative publicity, customer dissatisfaction, damage to our reputation or, in some circumstances, delays in new product clearances or approvals.
When an exoskeleton is used by a paralyzed individual to walk, the individual relies completely on the exoskeleton to hold him or her upright. Between 2013 and 2021, we submitted medical device reports (“MDRs”) to the FDA (and equivalent authorities outside of the United States) relating to reports of falls and fractures of individuals using the ReWalk Personal Exoskeleton system. We conducted a voluntary correction related to certain use instructions in the device’s labeling, which the FDA classified as a Class II recall. The recall was closed in November 2019, and the FDA cleared our 510(k) containing revised instructions for use in May 2020. Since that time, we have submitted seven further MDRs.
In addition, our products incorporate sophisticated computer software and hardware. Complex software frequently contains errors, especially when first introduced. Our software may experience errors or performance problems in the future. If any part of our product’s hardware or software were to fail, the user could experience death or serious injury. For example, in 2021 ReWalk submitted medical device reports to the FDA and medical device vigilance reports to the European regulatory authorities and initiated a correction in response to two complaints regarding battery thermal runaway events. The correction that includes clarification of previous instructions and additional information on battery operation and storage is closed in Europe and in the United States. ReWalk has separately initiated a design project to improve power management and battery operation during charge and discharge, and this project remains in process. Additionally, users may not use or maintain our products in accordance with safety, storage, and training protocols, which could enhance the risk of death or injury. Any such occurrence could cause delay in market acceptance of our products, damage to our reputation, the need for additional regulatory filings, product recalls, increased service and warranty costs, product liability claims, and loss of revenue relating to hardware or software defects.
The medical device industry has historically been subject to extensive litigation over product liability claims. We have been and anticipate that as part of our ordinary course of business we may be subject to product liability claims alleging defects in the design, manufacture, or labeling of any of our products which has resulted in an injury or death. A product liability claim, regardless of its merit or eventual outcome, could result in significant legal defense costs and high punitive damage payments. Although we maintain product liability insurance, the coverage is subject to deductibles and limitations, and may not be adequate to cover future claims. Additionally, we may be unable to maintain our existing product liability insurance in the future at satisfactory rates or adequate amounts. Any alleged defect that has resulted in an adverse event involving our products could result in future voluntary corrective actions, such as recalls or customer letters, or in an FDA enforcement action, such as a mandatory recall, notification to healthcare professionals and users, warning letter, seizure, injunction or import alert. In addition, failure to report such adverse events to appropriate government authorities on a timely basis, or at all, could result in enforcement action against us. Any action, whether voluntary or involuntary, as well as defending ourselves in a lawsuit, will require financial resources and distract management, and may harm our reputation and financial results.
If we are unable to leverage our sales, marketing, and training infrastructure we may fail to increase our sales.
A key element of our long-term business strategy is the continued leveraging of our sales, marketing, training, and reimbursement infrastructure, through the training, retention, and motivation of skilled sales and marketing representatives and reimbursement personnel with industry experience and knowledge. Our ability to derive revenue from sales of our products depends largely on our ability to market the products and obtain reimbursements for them. In order to continue growing our business efficiently, we must therefore coordinate the development of our sales, marketing, training and reimbursement infrastructure with the timing of regulatory approvals, decisions regarding reimbursements, limited resources consideration and other factors in various geographies. Managing and maintaining our sales and marketing infrastructure is expensive and time consuming, and an inability to leverage such an organization effectively, or in coordination with regulatory or other developments, could inhibit potential sales and the penetration and adoption of our products into both existing and new markets. However, certain decisions we make regarding staffing in these areas in our efforts to maintain an adequate spending level could have unintended negative effects on our revenue, such as by weakening our sales infrastructure, impairing our reimbursement efforts and/or harming the quality of our customer service.
Additionally, we expect to face significant challenges as we manage and continue to improve our sales and marketing infrastructure and work to retain the individuals who make up those networks. Newly hired sales representatives require training and take time to achieve full productivity. If we fail to train new hires adequately, or if we experience high turnover in our sales force in the future, we cannot be certain that new hires will become as productive as may be necessary to maintain or increase our sales. In addition, if we are not able to retain existing and recruit new trainers to our clinical staff, we may not be able to successfully train customers on the use of ReWalk, AlterG, or ReStore systems which could inhibit new sales and harm our reputation. If we are unable to expand our sales, marketing, and training capabilities, we may not be able to effectively commercialize our products, or enhance the strength of our brand, which could have a material adverse effect on our operating results.
The potential health benefits of our ReWalk products have not been substantiated by long-term clinical data, which could limit sales of such products.
Although published research and users of our ReWalk products have reported the potential secondary health benefits of our ReWalk products such as a reduction in pain and spasticity, improved bowel and urinary tract functions and emotional and psychosocial benefits, among others, currently there is no large scale, randomized clinical trial establishing the secondary health benefits of ReWalk products due to the relatively small size of the applicable user population. There is also a lack of randomized clinical data for such health benefits of the ReStore-specifically its long-term benefits following the usage of the product within the clinic as the trials conducted to date using this product are limited.
As a result, potential customers and healthcare providers may be slower to adopt or recommend ReWalk products or ReStore and third-party payors may not be willing to provide coverage or reimbursement for our products. In addition, future studies or clinical experience may indicate that treatment with our current or future products is not superior to treatment with alternative products or therapies. Such results could slow the adoption of our products and significantly reduce our sales.
We depend on third-party suppliers to manufacture our ReWalk and AlterG products and we rely on a limited number of third-party suppliers for certain components of our products.
We have contracted with Sanmina and Cirtronics, each a well-established contract manufacturer with expertise in the medical device industry, for the manufacture of all our ReWalk and ReStore systems and our AlterG products, respectively, and the sourcing of all of our components and raw materials for those products. We may terminate our relationship with Cirtronics through notice at least one year prior to the expiration of the initial term or renewal term of the contract. We may terminate our relationship with Sanmina at any time upon written notice. Either we, on the one hand, or Sanmina or Cirtronics, on the other hand, may terminate the respective relationship in the event of a material breach, subject to a 30-day cure period in the case of Sanmina or a 45-day period in the case of Cirtronics. For our business strategy to be successful, each of Sanmina and AlterG must be able to manufacture our products in sufficient quantities, in compliance with regulatory requirements and quality control standards, in accordance with agreed upon specifications, at acceptable costs and quality levels, and on a timely basis. Increases in our product sales, whether forecasted or unanticipated, could strain the ability of Sanmina or Cirtronics to manufacture an increasingly large supply of our current or future products in a manner that meets these various requirements. In addition, although we are not restricted from engaging an alternative manufacturer, and potentially have the capabilities to manufacture our products in-house, the process of moving our manufacturing activities would be time consuming and costly, and may limit our ability to meet our sales commitments, which could harm our reputation and could have a material adverse effect on our business. Moreover, the failure of either of Sanmina or Cirtronics to comply with applicable regulatory requirements could expose us to regulatory action including warning letters, product recalls, termination of distribution, product seizures or civil penalties.
We also rely on third-party suppliers, many of which contract directly with Sanmina and Cirtronics, to supply certain components of our products, and in some cases, we purchase these components ourselves. Neither Lifeward, Sanmina, nor Cirtronics has long-term supply agreements with most of the suppliers and, in many cases, make purchases on a purchase order basis and our ability to secure adequate quantities of such products may be limited. Suppliers may encounter problems that limit their ability to manufacture components for our products, including financial difficulties or damage to their manufacturing equipment or facilities. If Lifeward, Sanmina, or Cirtronics fails to obtain sufficient quantities of high-quality components to meet demand on a timely basis, we could lose customer orders, our reputation may be harmed, and our business could suffer.
Our results of operations and liquidity could be adversely impacted by supply chain disruptions and operational challenges faced by our manufacturer or suppliers. Each of Sanmina and Cirtronics generally uses a small number of suppliers for the ReWalk products and the AlterG products, respectively. Depending on a limited number of suppliers exposes us to risks, including limited control over pricing, availability, quality, and delivery schedules. Such risks were heightened in light of the interruptions in supply chains and distribution networks related to the COVID-19 pandemic. For example, as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, several components, mainly electronic parts, experienced price increases. If any one or more of our suppliers ceases to provide sufficient quantities of components in a timely manner or on acceptable terms, we, Sanmina, or Cirtronics would have to seek alternative sources of supply or accept price increase as we saw during the pandemic. It may be difficult to engage additional or replacement suppliers in a timely manner. Failure of these suppliers to deliver products at the level our business requires would limit our ability to meet our sales commitments, which could harm our reputation and could have a material adverse effect on our business. The ability of these suppliers to perform is largely outside of our control. We, Sanmina, or Cirtronics also may have difficulty obtaining similar components from other acceptable suppliers, which could require Sanmina, Cirtronics, or us to cease using the components, seek alternative components or technologies and we could be forced to modify our products to incorporate alternative components or technologies, which could result in a requirement to seek additional regulatory clearances or approvals. Any disruption of this nature or increased expenses could harm our commercialization efforts and adversely affect our operating results.
Sanmina’s manufacturing and assembly of our ReWalk products pursuant to our specifications is conducted at a single facility in Ma’alot, Israel, and, starting in January 2025, Cirtronics’ manufacturing and assembly of our AlterG products pursuant to our specifications is conducted at a single facility in Milford, New Hampshire. Accordingly, we are highly dependent on the uninterrupted and efficient operation of these facilities. If operations at either of these facilities were to be disrupted as a result of acts of war or terrorism, equipment failures, earthquakes and other natural disasters, fires, accidents, work stoppages, power outages, or other reasons such as a local shutdown as we experienced during the COVID-19 pandemic, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected. In particular, Sanmina’s facility is located in the north of Israel within range of rockets that have from time to time been fired into the country during armed conflicts with Hezbollah and other armed groups in Lebanon, Syria or other countries in the region. For more information, see the risk factor below entitled “Risks Related to Our Incorporation and Location in Israel - Conditions in Israel, including Israel’s wars against Hamas and other terrorist organizations in the Gaza Strip and against Hezbollah on Israel’s northern border, may materially and adversely affect our business and results of operations.” Although our manufacturing and assembly operations could be transferred elsewhere, either in-house or to alternative Sanmina or Cirtronics facilities, the process of relocating these operations would cause delays in production. Lost sales or increased costs that we may experience during the disruption, or a forced relocation, of operations may not be recoverable under our insurance policies, and longer-term business disruptions could result in a loss of customers. If this were to occur, our business, financial condition and operations could be materially negatively impacted. Additionally, our reliance on Sanmina and Cirtronics as contract manufacturers or any other contract manufacturer makes us vulnerable to possible capacity constraints and reduced control over component availability, delivery schedules, manufacturing yields and costs.
We operate in a competitive industry that is subject to rapid technological change, and we expect competition to increase.
There are several other companies developing technology and devices that compete with our products. Our principal competitors in the medical exoskeleton market consist of Ekso Bionics, Rex Bionics, Cyberdyne, FREE Bionics, Wandercraft, and others. These companies have products currently available for institutional use and in some cases personal use. We expect some of such products to become available for personal use in the next few years, especially as we continue to expand coverage by different payors and geographies. In addition, we compete with alternative devices and alternative therapies, including treadmill-based gait therapies, such as those offered by DIH (formerly known as Hocoma), Boost, Aretech, BTL, Reha Technology, and Bioness, which is a unit of Bioventus. Our competitor base may change or expand as we continue to develop and commercialize our soft suit exoskeleton product in the future. These or other medical device or robotics companies, academic and research institutions, or others, may develop new technologies or therapies that provide a superior walking and usage experience, are more effective in treating the secondary medical conditions that we target or are less expensive than ReWalk, AlterG, or ReStore, or future products. Our technologies and products could be rendered obsolete by such developments. We may also compete with other treatments and technologies that address the secondary medical conditions that our products seek to mitigate.
Our competitors may respond more quickly to new or emerging technologies, undertake more extensive marketing campaigns, have greater financial, marketing, and other resources than we do or may be more successful in attracting potential customers, employees, and strategic partners. In addition, potential customers, such as hospitals and rehabilitation centers, could have long-standing or contractual relationships with competitors or other medical device companies. Potential customers may be reluctant to adopt ReWalk, AlterG, or ReStore, particularly if it competes with or has the potential to compete with or diminish the need/utilization of products or treatments supported through these existing relationships. If we are not able to compete effectively, our business and results of operations will be negatively impacted.
In addition, because we operate in a new market, the actions of our competitors could adversely affect our business. Adverse events such as product defects or legal claims with respect to competing or similar products could cause reputational harm to the exoskeleton market on the whole. Further, adverse regulatory findings or reimbursement-related decisions with respect to other exoskeleton products could negatively impact the entire market and, accordingly, our business.
We utilize independent distributors for the ReWalk and ReStore products who are free to market other products that compete with ours.
While we expect that the percentage of our sales generated from independent distributors will decrease over time as we continue to focus our resources on achieving reimbursement within our direct markets in the United States and Europe, we believe that independent distributors of the ReWalk or ReStore products will continue to be an important distribution channel for us in the future. None of our independent distributors has been required to sell our products exclusively. Our agreements with these distributors generally have one-year initial terms and automatic renewals for an additional year. If any of our key independent distributors of the ReWalk or ReStore products were to cease to distribute our products, our sales could be adversely affected. In such a situation, we may need to seek alternative independent distributors or increase our reliance on our other independent distributors or our direct sales representatives, which may not prevent our sales from being adversely affected. Additionally, to the extent that we enter into additional arrangements with independent distributors to perform sales, marketing, or distribution services, the terms of the arrangements could cause our product margins to be lower than if we directly marketed and sold our products.
We may receive a significant number of warranty claims or our ReWalk, AlterG, or ReStore systems may require significant amounts of service after sale.
Sales of ReWalk systems generally include a five-year warranty for parts and services, other than for normal wear and tear. Some of our active devices were delivered prior to 2019 with a two-year warranty so we provide these customers with the option to purchase an extended warranty for up to an additional three years. Our ReStore product offering includes a two-year warranty for parts and services. The AlterG Anti-Gravity systems are sold with a one-year factory warranty covering parts and services. If product returns or warranty claims are significant or exceed our expectations, we could incur unanticipated expenditures for parts and services, which could have a material adverse effect on our operating results.
We may not be able to enhance our exoskeleton product offerings through our research and development efforts.
In order to increase our sales and our market share in the exoskeleton market, we are working to enhance and broaden our research and development efforts and product offerings in response to the evolving demands of people with paraplegia, paralysis, other medical conditions and healthcare providers, as well as competitive technologies. We are also currently involved in ongoing research and development efforts directed to the needs of patients with other mobility impairments, such as stroke, and began commercializing our ReStore product for stroke patients in 2019. We continue to market the device in the U.S. (EU sales ceased in May 2024). Depending on our future resources and business focus, we plan to address these needs in patients with other conditions or devices for stroke patients to be used at home, improving our current products, or developing products to address additional medical conditions such as multiple sclerosis, Parkinson’s disease or cerebral palsy and support elderly assistance. We may decide to invest our business development resources in partnerships, licensing agreements, business acquisition and other ways that will provide us new product offerings without significant research and development activities. We may not be successful in developing, obtaining regulatory approval for, or marketing our currently proposed products, or our approved products for additional indications, products proposed to be created in the future or products that will be available for us through business acquisitions. In addition, notwithstanding our market research efforts, our future products may not be accepted by consumers, their caregivers, healthcare providers or third-party payors who reimburse consumers for our products. The success of any proposed product offerings will depend on numerous factors, including our ability to:
•
identify the product features that people with paraplegia or paralysis, their caregivers, and healthcare providers are seeking in a medical device that restores upright mobility and successfully incorporate those features into our products;
•
identify the product features that people with stroke, multiple sclerosis or other similar indications require while the products are used at home as well as what items are valuable to the clinics that provide them rehabilitation;
•
develop and introduce proposed products in sufficient quantities and in a timely manner;
•
adequately protect our intellectual property and avoid infringing upon the intellectual property rights of third-parties;
•
demonstrate the safety, efficacy, and health benefits of proposed products; and
•
obtain the necessary regulatory clearances and approvals for proposed products.
If we fail to generate demand by developing products that incorporate features desired by consumers, their caregivers or healthcare providers, or if we do not obtain regulatory clearance or approval for proposed products in time to meet market demand, we may fail to generate sales sufficient to achieve or maintain profitability. We have in the past experienced, and we may in the future experience, delays in various phases of product development, including during research and development, manufacturing, limited release testing, marketing, and customer education efforts. Such delays could cause customers to delay or forgo purchases of our products, or to purchase our competitors’ products. Even if we are able to successfully develop proposed products when anticipated, these products may not produce sales in excess of the costs of development, and they may be quickly rendered obsolete by changing consumer preferences or the introduction by our competitors of products embodying new technologies or features.
We may enter into collaborations, in-licensing arrangements, joint ventures, strategic alliances, business acquisitions or partnerships with third parties that may not result in the development of commercially viable products or the generation of significant future revenue.
In the ordinary course of our business, we may enter into collaborations, in-licensing arrangements, joint ventures, strategic alliances, business acquisitions, partnerships or other arrangements to develop our products and to pursue new geographic or product markets. Proposing, negotiating, and implementing collaborations, in-licensing arrangements, joint ventures, strategic alliances, or partnerships may be a lengthy and complex process. Other companies, including those with substantially greater financial, marketing, sales, technology or other business resources, may compete with us for these opportunities or arrangements. We may not identify, secure, or complete any such transactions or arrangements in a timely manner, on a cost-effective basis, on acceptable terms or at all. We have limited institutional knowledge and experience with respect to these business development activities, and we may also not realize the anticipated benefits of any such transaction or arrangement. In particular, these collaborations may not result in the development of products that achieve commercial success or result in significant revenue and could be terminated prior to developing any products. For example, we have entered into agreements with MediTouch and MYOLYN for the distribution of their products in the U.S. After several years of commercial collaboration, we determined that the agreement with MediTouch would not yield commercially acceptable results for us and we terminated the agreement as of January 31, 2023. Similarly, the distribution arrangement with MYOLYN or other new future arrangements may not be as productive or successful as we hope.
On May 16, 2016, we entered into the Collaboration Agreement and License Agreement with Harvard. Pursuant to the Collaboration Agreement, we have agreed to collaborate with Harvard for the research, design, development, and commercialization of lightweight exoskeleton system technologies for lower limb disabilities, aimed to treat stroke, multiple sclerosis, mobility limitations for the elderly and other medical applications. The Collaboration Agreement concluded on March 31, 2022. The License Agreement will continue in full force and effect until the expiration of the last-to-expire valid claim of the licensed patents. For more information on the collaboration with Harvard, see “Part I. Item 1. Business - Research and Development - Research and Development Collaboration.”
Additionally, as we pursue these arrangements and choose to pursue other collaborations, in-licensing arrangements, joint ventures, strategic alliances, or partnerships in the future, we may not be in a position to exercise sole decision-making authority regarding the transaction or arrangement. This could create the potential risk of creating impasses on decisions, and our collaborators may have economic or business interests or goals that are, or that may become, inconsistent with our business interests or goals. It is possible that conflicts may arise with our collaborators. Our collaborators or any future collaborators may act in their self-interest, which may be adverse to our best interest, and they may breach their obligations to us. Disputes between us and our collaborators or any future collaborators may result in litigation or arbitration which would increase our expenses and divert the attention of our management. Further, these transactions and arrangements are contractual in nature and may be terminated or dissolved under the terms of the applicable agreements. Our collaborators or any future collaborators may allege that we have breached our agreement with them, and accordingly seek to terminate such agreement, which could adversely affect our competitive business position and harm our business prospects.
We may seek to grow our business through acquisitions of businesses, products or technologies, and the failure to manage acquisitions, or the failure to integrate them with our existing business, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and operating results.
From time to time, we may consider opportunities to acquire or license other products or technologies that may enhance our product platform or technology, expand the breadth of our markets or customer base, or advance our business strategies. For example, as discussed above in “Part I. Item 1. Business - Overview”, on August 11, 2023, we completed the acquisition of AlterG which became an indirect and wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company. Potential acquisitions involve numerous risks, including:
●
problems assimilating the acquired products or technologies;
●
issues maintaining uniform standards, procedures, controls and policies;
●
problems integrating employees from an acquired organization into our company and integrating each company’s accounting, management information, human resources and other administrative systems;
●
unanticipated costs associated with acquisitions;
●
diversion of management’s attention from our existing business operations;
●
potential incurrence of debt, contingent liabilities or amortization expenses, or write-offs of goodwill;
●
risks associated with entering new markets in which we have limited or no experience; and
●
increased legal and accounting costs relating to the acquisitions or compliance with regulatory matters.
We have no current commitments with respect to any acquisition or licensing. We do not know if we will be able to identify such acquisitions or licensing we deem suitable, whether we will be able to successfully complete any such transactions on favorable terms, or at all, or whether we will be able to successfully integrate any acquired products or technologies. Our potential inability to integrate any acquired products or technologies effectively may adversely affect our business, operating results, and financial condition. For more information, see the risk factor above entitled “Risks Related to Our Business and Our Industry - We may fail to realize the benefits expected from our acquisition of AlterG, which could adversely affect the price of our ordinary shares.”
Risks Related to Government Regulation
Although the FDA granted Breakthrough Device Designation status to our ReBoot device, this designation does not guarantee regulatory clearance, or a speedier clearance timeline.
In November 2021, the FDA granted Breakthrough Device Designation status to ReBoot, a personal soft exo-suit for home and community use by individuals post-stroke. For more information regarding the Breakthrough Device, see “Part I, Item 1. Business-Government Regulation” above.
However, achieving Breakthrough Device Designation status does not guarantee regulatory clearance or approval or a speedier clearance or approval timeline. We have not yet submitted a premarket submission to the FDA or any foreign regulatory agency for clearance or other marketing authorization of ReBoot. Further investment in the development path of the ReBoot was paused in 2023 pending determination regarding the clinical and commercial opportunity of this device and it remains indefinitely on hold.
U.S. healthcare reform measures and other potential legislative initiatives could adversely affect our business.
Recent political changes in the United States could result in significant changes in, and uncertainty with respect to, legislation, regulation, global trade, and government policy that could substantially impact our business and the medical device industry generally. Certain proposals, if enacted into law, could impose limitations on the prices we will be able to charge for our ReWalk system or any products we may develop and offer in the future, or the amounts of reimbursement available for such products from governmental agencies or third-party payors. Additionally, any reduction in reimbursement from Medicare or other government-funded federal programs, including the VHA, or state healthcare programs could lead to a similar reduction in payments from private commercial payors. The FDA’s policies may also change, and additional government regulations may be issued that could prevent, limit, or delay regulatory approval of our future products, or impose more stringent product labeling and post-marketing testing and other requirements.
We expect that changes or additions to the Medicare and Medicaid programs, changes allowing the federal government to directly negotiate drug prices and changes stemming from other healthcare reform measures, especially with regard to healthcare access, financing or other legislation in individual states, could have a material adverse effect on the healthcare industry.
The Budget Control Act of 2011, among other things, created the Joint Select Committee on Deficit Reduction to recommend proposals in spending reductions to Congress. The Joint Select Committee did not achieve its targeted deficit reduction of an amount greater than $1.2 trillion for the fiscal years 2012 through 2021, triggering the legislation’s automatic reductions to several government programs. These reductions included aggregate reductions to Medicare payments to healthcare providers of up to 2% per fiscal year. The Bipartisan Budget Act of 2018 retained the federal budget “sequestration” Medicare payment reductions of 2% and extended it through 2031. Under the Consolidated Appropriations Acts of 2023 and 2024, the Medicare sequester percentage in FY2032 is scheduled to be 2% from April 1, 2032, through September 30, 2032, and 0% for October 1, 2032, through March 31, 2032, unless congressional action is taken. On January 2, 2013, the American Taxpayer Relief Act was signed into law, which, among other things, reduced Medicare payments to several types of providers, including hospitals, imaging centers, and cancer treatment centers, and increased the statute of limitations period for the government to recover overpayments to providers from three to five years. The 2022 Inflation Reduction Act, among other things, directs CMS to engage in price-capped negotiation for certain drugs and biologics that CMS reimburses under Medicare Part B and Part D, penalizes drug manufacturers that increase prices of Medicare Part B and Part D drugs at a rate greater than the rate of inflation, and redesigns the Part D drug benefit, effective in 2025.
The implementation of cost containment measures or other healthcare reforms may thus prevent us from being able to generate revenue, attain profitability or further commercialize our existing or future products. We are currently unable to predict what additional legislation or regulation, if any, relating to the health care industry may be enacted in the future or what effect recently enacted federal legislation or any such additional legislation or regulation would have on our business. The pendency or approval of such proposals or reforms could result in a decrease in our stock price or limit our ability to raise capital or to enter into collaboration agreements for the further development and commercialization of our programs and products.
Our devices are subject to the FDA’s regulations pertaining to marketing and promotional communications, among others. Failure to comply with such regulations may give rise to a number of potential FDA enforcement actions, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business.
Our sales and marketing efforts, as well as promotions, are subject to various laws and regulations. Medical device promotions must be consistent with and not contrary to labeling and the indication for use, be truthful and not false or misleading, and be adequately substantiated. In addition to the requirements applicable to 510(k)-cleared products, we may also be subject to enforcement action in connection with any promotion of an investigational new device. A sponsor or investigator, or any person acting on behalf of a sponsor or investigator, may not represent in a promotional context that an investigational new device is safe or effective for the purposes for which it is under investigation or otherwise promote the device.
Our marketing and promotional materials are subject to FDA scrutiny to ensure that the device is being marketed in compliance with these requirements. If the FDA investigates our marketing and promotional materials and finds that any of our current or future commercial products were being marketed for unapproved or uncleared uses or in a false or misleading manner, we could be subject to FDA enforcement or enforcement from other government agencies, and/or false advertising consumer lawsuits, each of which could have a material adverse effect on our business.
We are subject to extensive governmental regulations relating to the manufacturing, labeling, and marketing of our products, and a failure to comply with such regulations could lead to withdrawal or recall of our products from the market.
Our medical products and manufacturing operations are subject to regulation by the FDA, the European Union, and other governmental authorities both inside and outside of the United States. These agencies enforce laws and regulations that govern the development, testing, manufacturing, labeling, storage, installation, servicing, advertising, promoting, marketing, distribution, import, export and market surveillance of our products.
Our products are regulated as medical devices in the United States under the FFDCA as implemented and enforced by the FDA. Under the FFDCA, medical devices are classified into one of three classes (Class I, Class II or Class III) depending on the degree of risk associated with the medical device, what is known about the type of device, and the extent of control needed to provide reasonable assurance of safety and effectiveness. Classification of a device is important because the class to which a device is assigned determines, among other things, the necessity and type of FDA review required prior to marketing the device. For more information, see “Part I, Item 1. Business-Government Regulation” above.
In June 2014, the FDA granted our request for “de novo” classification, which provides a route to market for medical devices that are low to moderate risk, but are not substantially equivalent to a predicate device, and classified ReWalk as Class II powered exoskeleton device subject to certain special controls. In March 2023 the FDA granted 510(k) clearance for the ReWalk Personal Exoskeleton with stair and curb functionality, which adds usage on stairs and curbs to the indication for use for the device in the U.S. The ReWalk is intended to enable individuals with spinal cord injuries to perform ambulatory functions under supervision of a specially trained companion, and inside rehabilitation institutions. The special controls established in the de novo order for all powered exoskeletons include the following: clinical testing to demonstrate safe and effective use considering the level of supervision necessary and the use environment; non-clinical safety and performance testing, including durability testing to demonstrate that the device performs as intended under anticipated conditions of use; a training program; and labeling related to device use and user training. In order for us to market ReWalk, we must comply with both general controls, including controls related to quality, facility registration, reporting of adverse events and labeling, and the special controls established for the device. Failure to comply with these requirements could lead to an FDA enforcement action, which would have a material adverse effect on our business.
In June 2019, the FDA issued a 510(k) clearance for our ReStore device. ReStore is intended to be used to assist ambulatory functions in rehabilitation institutions under the supervision of a trained therapist for people with hemiplegia or hemiparesis due to stroke who have a specified amount of ambulatory function. In order for us to market ReStore and ReWalk, we must comply with both general controls, including controls related to quality, facility registration, reporting of adverse events and labeling, and the special controls established for powered exoskeleton devices as described above. Failure to comply with these requirements could lead to an FDA enforcement action, which would have a material adverse effect on our business.
In the E.U. we are subject to regulations and standards regulating the design, manufacture, clinical trials, labeling and adverse event (i.e., vigilance) reporting for medical devices. The Medical Devices Regulation (EU) 2017/745 (MDR) became fully applicable on May 26, 2021, repealing and replacing the pre-existing E.U. Medical Devices Directive 93/42/EEC. Devices that comply with the requirements of the MDR, subject to certain transitional provisions that allow continued compliance of certain products to the Directive, are entitled to bear the CE mark, indicating that the device conforms to the essential requirements of the MDR and, accordingly, can be commercially distributed throughout the European Economic Area (i.e., the E.U. Member States plus Norway, Iceland, and Lichtenstein). We comply with the E.U. requirements and have received the CE mark for all of our ReWalk systems including the ReStore device which are distributed in the E.U. As compared with the Directive, the MDR includes additional premarket and post-market requirements, as well as potential product reclassifications and more stringent commercialization requirements that could adversely affect our CE mark. Failure to comply with these new requirements could lead to substantial penalties, including fines, revocation or suspension of CE mark and criminal sanctions. Because the ReStore was not planned for MDR conformity, we ceased sales of the ReStore in the EU in May 2024.
Following the introduction of a product, the governmental agencies will periodically inspect our manufacturing processes and quality controls, and we are under a continuing obligation to ensure that all applicable regulatory requirements continue to be met. The process of complying with the applicable good manufacturing practices, adverse event reporting and other requirements can be costly and time consuming, and could delay or prevent the production, manufacturing, or sale of our devices. In addition, if we fail to comply with applicable regulatory requirements, it could result in fines, closure of manufacturing sites, seizures or recalls of products and damage to our reputation, as well as enforcement actions against us. For example, the FDA could request that we recall our ReWalk Personal Exoskeleton or ReStore device in case of product defects or require us to conduct post-market surveillance studies. If we fail to recall the device and/or conduct requested post-market surveillance studies to FDA’s satisfaction, we could be subject to FDA enforcement action.
In addition, governmental agencies may impose new requirements regarding registration or labeling that may require us to modify or re-register our products or otherwise impact our ability to market our products in those countries, such as the May 2021 Medical Device Regulation changes in the European Union. The process of complying with these governmental regulations can be costly and time consuming, and could delay or prevent the production, manufacturing, or sale of our products.
If we or our third-party manufacturers fail to comply with the FDA’s Quality System Regulation, or QSR, our manufacturing operations could be interrupted.
We and our manufacturers, Sanmina and Cirtronics, are required to comply with the FDA’s QSR which covers the methods and documentation of the design, testing, production, control, quality assurance, labeling, packaging, sterilization, storage, and shipping of our products. In February 2024, the FDA issued the Quality Management System Regulation Final Rule to amend the QSR, incorporating by reference the international standard for medical device quality management systems set by the International Organization for Standardization (ISO), ISO 13485:2016. The rule will become effective on February 2, 2026. Until then, manufacturers are required to comply with the QSR. We, Sanmina, Cirtronics and our suppliers are also subject to the regulations of foreign jurisdictions regarding the manufacturing process if we or our distributors market our products abroad. We actively maintain compliance with the FDA’s QSR, and the European Union’s Quality Management Systems requirements, ISO 13485:2016. We continue to monitor our quality management to maintain our overall level of compliance. Our facilities are subject to periodic and unannounced inspection by U.S. and foreign regulatory agencies to audit compliance with the QSR and comparable foreign regulations. If our facilities or those of Sanmina of Cirtronics or our suppliers are found to be in violation of applicable laws and regulations, or if we, Sanmina, Cirtronics or our suppliers fail to take satisfactory corrective action in response to an adverse inspection, the regulatory authority could take enforcement action, including any of the following sanctions:
●
untitled letters, warning letters, fines, injunctions, consent decrees and civil penalties;
●
customer notifications or repair, replacement, or refunds;
●
operating restrictions or partial suspension or total shutdown of production;
●
recalls, withdrawals, or administrative detention or seizure of our products;
●
denials or delays of approvals for pre-market approval applications relating to new products or modified products;
●
withdrawals of a PMA approvals;
●
refusal to provide Certificates for Foreign Government;
●
refusal to grant export approval for our products; or
●
pursuit of criminal prosecution.
Any of these sanctions could impair our ability to produce our products in a cost-effective and timely manner in order to meet our customers’ demands and could have a material adverse effect on our reputation, business, results of operations, and financial condition. We may also be required to bear other costs or take other actions that may have a negative impact on our future sales and our ability to generate profits.
We are subject to various laws and regulations, including “fraud and abuse” laws and anti-bribery laws, which, if violated, could subject us to substantial penalties.
Medical device companies such as ours have faced lawsuits and investigations pertaining to alleged violations of numerous statutes and regulations, including anti-corruption laws and health care “fraud and abuse” laws, such as the federal False Claims Act, the federal Anti-Kickback Statute, and the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, or the FCPA.
U.S. federal and state laws, including the federal Sunshine Act, and the implementation of Open Payments regulations under the Sunshine Act, require medical device companies to disclose certain payments or other transfers of value made to certain healthcare providers or funds spent on marketing and promotion of medical device products. Further, some state laws require medical device companies to report information related to payments to physicians and other health care providers or marketing expenditures. They also impose additional administrative and compliance burdens on us. In particular, these laws influence, among other things, how we structure our sales offerings and other interactions with health care providers, including discount practices, customer support, education and training programs and physician consulting and other service arrangements, including those with marketers and sales agents. We may face significant costs in attempting to comply with these laws and regulations. If we are found to be in violation of any of these requirements or any actions or investigations are instituted against us, those actions could be costly to defend and could have a significant impact on our business, including the imposition of significant criminal and civil fines and penalties, exclusion from federal healthcare programs or other sanctions, and damage to our reputation or business.
The FCPA applies to U.S. companies, including companies like ours that are issuers of a class of securities registered under the Exchange Act. The FCPA and other global and local anti-bribery laws which apply to various aspects of our operations generally prohibit companies and their directors, officers, employees, agents, and other intermediaries from, directly or indirectly, authorizing, promising, offering, providing, or making improper payments or giving anything else of value to government officials for the purpose of obtaining or retaining an unfair business advantage. The FCPA also requires issuers to make and keep books and records that accurately and fairly reflect the transactions of the corporation and to devise and maintain an adequate system of internal accounting controls. In various jurisdictions, our operations require us and third parties acting on our behalf to routinely interact with government officials, including medical personnel who may be considered government officials for purposes of these laws because they are employees of state-owned or controlled facilities. Other applicable anti-bribery laws, including the U. K. Bribery Act, also prohibit improper payments to private parties and prohibit the receipt of improper payments. Our policies mandate compliance with applicable anti-bribery laws and prohibit our employees and third parties we engage from offering, making or receiving corrupt payments. We have also implemented a robust anti-corruption program to mitigate the risk of violations of anti-bribery laws relating to our international operations. However, our program cannot eliminate all risk that unauthorized improper acts have been or will be committed by our employees or agents. Violations of anti-bribery laws, or allegations of such violations, could result in civil or criminal sanctions or other adverse consequences, including disruption of our business and harming our financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and reputation.
If we are found to have violated laws protecting the confidentiality of patient health information, we could be subject to civil or criminal penalties, which could increase our liabilities and harm our reputation or our business.
There are a number of federal, state and foreign laws protecting the confidentiality of certain patient health information, including patient records, and restricting the use and disclosure of that protected information. In particular, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, or HHS, promulgated patient privacy rules under HIPAA. These privacy rules protect medical records and other personal health information by limiting their use and disclosure, giving individuals the right to access, amend and seek accounting of their own health information and limiting most use and disclosures of health information to the minimum amount reasonably necessary to accomplish the intended purpose. Additionally, the E.U. General Data Protection Regulation (the “EU GDPR”) and the E.U. Member State laws, imposes more stringent data protection requirements and provides for penalties for noncompliance. Additionally, if we or any of our service providers are found to be in violation of the promulgated patient privacy rules under HIPAA or the EU GDPR and E.U. Member State laws, we could be subject to civil or criminal penalties, which could be substantial and could increase our liabilities, harm our reputation and have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and operating results.
A number of U.S. states have also enacted data privacy and security laws and regulations that govern the collection, use, disclosure, transfer, storage, disposal, and protection of sensitive personal information, such as social security numbers, financial information and other personal information. For example, several U.S. territories and all 50 states now have data breach laws that require timely notification to individual victims, and at times regulators, if a company has experienced the unauthorized access or acquisition of sensitive personal data. Several states have also enacted comprehensive consumer privacy laws that regulate controllers’ processing of consumers’ personal data, including the California Consumer Privacy Act (“CCPA”), which went into effect on January 1, 2020 and, among other things, established a comprehensive privacy framework for covered businesses by creating an expanded definition of personal information, establishing new data privacy rights for consumers in the State of California, imposing special rules on the collection of consumer data from minors, and creating a new and potentially severe statutory damages framework for violations of the CCPA and for businesses that fail to implement reasonable security procedures and practices to prevent data breaches. The CCPA was amended by the California Privacy Rights Act which, as of January 1, 2023, has significantly modified the CCPA, including by expanding consumers’ rights with respect to certain categories of sensitive personal information.
Similar laws have been passed in numerous other states. Other states have proposed new privacy laws which, if enacted, may add additional complexity, variation in requirements, restrictions and potential legal risk, require additional investment of resources in compliance programs, impact strategies and the availability of previously useful data and could result in increased compliance costs and/or changes in business practices and policies. The existence of comprehensive privacy laws in different states in the country would make our compliance obligations more complex and costly and may increase the likelihood that we may be subject to enforcement actions or otherwise incur liability for noncompliance. There are also states that are specifically regulating health information. For example, Washington’s My Health My Data Act, which became effective on March 31, 2024, regulates the collection and sharing of health information and has a private right of action, which further increases the relevant compliance risk. Connecticut and Nevada have also passed similar laws regulating consumer health data. In addition, other states have proposed and/or passed legislation that regulates the privacy and/or security of certain specific types of information. For example, a small number of states have passed laws that regulate biometric data specifically.
We will continue to monitor and assess the impact of state law developments, which may impose substantial penalties for violations, impose significant costs for investigations and compliance, allow private class-action litigation and carry significant potential liability for our business. These various privacy and security laws may impact our business activities, including our identification of research subjects, relationships with business partners and ultimately the marketing and distribution of our products. State laws are changing rapidly and there are discussions in the U.S. Congress of new comprehensive federal data privacy laws to which we could become subject to, if enacted.
Our operations may also be subject to European data privacy laws, regulations and guidelines. The collection, use, storage, disclosure, transfer, or other processing of personal information regarding individuals in the EEA and UK, including personal health data, is subject to the EU GDPR, with respect to the EEA and the UK General Data Protection Regulation and UK Data Protection Act 2018 with respect to the UK, or UK GDPR, and collectively with the EU GDPR referred to as the “GDPR” in this document unless specified otherwise. The GDPR is wide-ranging in scope and imposes numerous requirements on companies that process personal information, including requirements relating to processing of special categories of personal information (such as health data), relying on a legal basis or condition for processing personal information, where required obtaining consent of the individuals to whom the personal information relates, providing information to individuals regarding data processing activities, conducting privacy impact assessments for “high risk” processing, implementing safeguards to protect the security and confidentiality of personal information, implementing limitations on the retention of personal information, providing mandatory notification of data breaches, and taking certain measures when engaging third-party processors. The GDPR also imposes strict rules on the transfer of personal information to countries outside the EEA and UK to non-adequate territories, including the United States in certain circumstances unless derogation exists or a valid GDPR transfer mechanism (for example, the European Commission approved Standard Contractual Clauses, or SCCs, and the UK International Data Transfer Agreement/Addendum, or UK IDTA) have been put in place. Where relying on the SCCs /UK IDTA for data transfers, we may also be required to carry out transfer impact assessments to assess whether the recipient is subject to local laws which allow public authority access to personal information. Failure to comply with the GDPR, and any supplemental EEA Member State or UK national data protection laws which may apply by virtue of the location of the individuals whose personal information we collect, may result in substantial penalties, including potential fines of up to €20 million (£17.5 million for the UK GDPR) or 4% of annual global revenues for the preceding financial year, whichever is greater. The GDPR also confers a private right of action on data subjects and consumer associations to lodge complaints with supervisory authorities, seek judicial remedies, and obtain compensation for damages resulting from violations of the GDPR. The GDPR increases our responsibility and liability in relation to personal information that we process where such processing is subject to the GDPR, and requires us to put in place additional mechanisms to ensure compliance with the GDPR, including as implemented by individual countries. Compliance with the GDPR will be a rigorous and time-intensive process that may increase our cost of doing business or require us to change our business practices, and despite those efforts, there is a risk that we may be subject to fines and penalties, litigation, and reputational harm in connection with our European activities.
Furthermore, in the EEA, the NIS 2 Directive (“NIS 2”) is replacing the cybersecurity legal framework under the current NIS framework, aiming to ensure a high level of cybersecurity in the region. NIS 2 brings new medium and large organisations providing services in the EEA within scope of the legal framework. It extends to additional sectors and expands the list of in-scope healthcare organisations, including to certain providers engaged in research and development of medicinal products. The new regime imposes direct obligations on management in respect of an in-scope organization's compliance with NIS 2, requires covered organisations to put in place certain cyber risk management measures, strengthens incident reporting requirements and provides supervisory authorities with a greater oversight. The majority of obligations will come into force when national legislation implementing NIS 2 becomes effective in the relevant EU Member State. EU Member States had until 17 October 2024 to transpose NIS 2 into national legislation, although many countries have still not completed the transposition. As such, the cybersecurity regulatory landscape in the EU is currently fragmented and uncertain. To the extent we are subject to NIS 2, we will require additional investment of our resources in compliance programs. Under NIS 2 companies may be subject to administrative fines of up to the higher amount of €10 million or 2% of worldwide turnover.
All of these evolving compliance and operational requirements impose significant costs, such as costs related to organizational changes, implementing additional protection technologies, training employees and engaging consultants and legal advisors, which are likely to increase over time. In addition, such requirements may require us to modify our data processing practices and policies, utilize management’s time and/or divert resources from other initiatives and projects. The interpretation and enforcement of the laws and regulations described above are uncertain and subject to change and may require substantial costs to monitor and implement compliance with any additional requirements. Failure, or perceived failure, to comply with U.S. or international data protection laws and regulations could result in government enforcement actions (which could include substantial civil and/or criminal penalties), private litigation, including class action privacy litigation in certain jurisdictions, and/or adverse publicity. which would subject us to significant fines, sanctions, awards, injunctions, penalties or judgments. All of the above could negatively affect our financial condition, operating results and business.
Our use of new and evolving technologies, such as artificial intelligence, may present risks and challenges that can impact our business, including by posing cybersecurity and other risks to our confidential and/or proprietary information, including personal information, and as a result we may be exposed to reputational harm and liability.
We may use and integrate artificial intelligence into our business processes. Use of this technology presents risks and challenges that could affect our business. If we enable or use solutions that draw controversy due to perceived or actual negative societal impact, we may experience brand or reputational harm, competitive harm or legal liability.
A growing number of legislators and regulators are adopting laws and regulations and have focused enforcement efforts on the adoption of artificial intelligence, and use of such technologies in compliance with ethical standards and societal expectations. These developments may increase our compliance burden and costs in connection with use of artificial intelligence and lead to legal liability if we fail to meet evolving legal standards or if use of such technologies results in harms or other causes of action we did not predict. For example, the EU’s Artificial Intelligence Act (“AI Act”) entered into force on August 1, 2024, with most provisions becoming effective on August 2, 2026. This legislation imposes significant obligations on providers and deployers of artificial intelligence systems, and encourages providers and deployers of artificial intelligence systems to account for EU ethical principles in their development and use of these systems. The scope of requirements depends on legal and risk determinations that rely on novel legal provisions that have not yet been interpreted by courts or regulators, and non-compliance can lead to significant fines.
Likewise, in the U.S., several states, including Colorado and California, passed laws that will take effect in 2026, to regulate various uses of artificial intelligence, including to make consequential decisions. In addition, various federal regulators have issued guidance and focused enforcement efforts on the use of AI in regulated sectors. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration, for example, issued guidance on the use of artificial intelligence in medical devices, requiring detailed risk management and review processes to obtain approvals. If we develop or use AI systems governed by these laws or regulations, we will need to meet higher standards of data quality, transparency, monitoring and human oversight, and we would need to adhere to specific and potentially burdensome and costly ethical, accountability, and administrative requirements, with the potential for significant enforcement or litigation in the event of any perceived non-compliance.
The rapid evolution of artificial intelligence will require the application of significant resources to design, develop, test and maintain such systems to help ensure that artificial intelligence is implemented in accordance with applicable law and regulation and in a socially responsible manner and to minimize any real or perceived unintended harmful impacts. The use of certain artificial intelligence technologies can also give rise to intellectual property risks, including by disclosing or otherwise compromising our confidential or proprietary intellectual property, or by undermining our ability to assert or defend ownership rights in intellectual property created with the assistance of artificial intelligence tools.
Our vendors may in turn incorporate artificial intelligence tools into their offerings, and the providers of these artificial intelligence tools may not meet existing or rapidly evolving regulatory or industry standards, including with respect to privacy and data security. Further, bad actors around the world use increasingly sophisticated methods, including the use of artificial intelligence, to engage in illegal activities involving the theft and misuse of personal information, confidential information and intellectual property. Any of these effects could damage our reputation, result in the loss of valuable property and information, cause us to breach applicable laws and regulations, and adversely impact our business.
Compliance with various regulations, including those related to our status as a U.S. public company and the manufacturing, labeling, and marketing of our products, may result in heightened general and administrative expenses and costs, divert management’s attention from revenue-generating activities and pose challenges for our management team, which has limited time, personnel and finances to devote to regulatory compliance.
As a U.S. public company, we are subject to various regulatory and reporting requirements, including those imposed by the SEC, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, or the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010, or the Dodd-Frank Act, the listing requirements of The Nasdaq Capital Market and other applicable securities rules and regulations. Additionally, our medical products and manufacturing operations are regulated by the FDA, the European Union and other governmental authorities both inside and outside of the United States. Compliance with the rules and regulations applicable to us as a publicly traded company in the United States and medical device manufacturer has greatly increased, and may continue to increase, our legal, general and administrative and financial compliance costs and has made, and may continue to make, some activities more difficult, time-consuming or costly. Additionally, these regulatory requirements have diverted, and may continue to divert, management’s attention from revenue-generating activities and may increase demands on management’s already-limited resources.
Our management team consists of few employees, as the majority of our employees are engaged in sales and marketing and research and development activities. For more information, see “Part I, Item 1. Business-Employees” above. In light of such constraints on its time, personnel and finances, our management may not be able to implement programs and policies in an effective and timely manner to respond adequately to the heightened legal, regulatory and reporting requirements applicable to us. In the past, for example, we have not always been able to respond on a timely basis to requests from regulators, although we have not to date experienced any long-term material adverse consequences as a result. Similar deficiencies, weaknesses, or lack of compliance with public company, medical device and other regulations could harm our reputation in the capital markets or for quality and safety, negatively affect our ability to maintain our public company status and to develop, commercialize or continue selling our products on a timely and effective basis, and cause us to incur sanctions, including fines, injunctions, and penalties.
In addition, complying with public disclosure rules makes our business more visible, which we believe may result in threatened or actual litigation, including by competitors and other third parties. If such claims are successful, our business and operating results could be harmed, and even if the claims do not result in litigation or are resolved in our favor, these claims, and the time and resources necessary to resolve them, could divert the resources of our management and harm our business and operating results.
We are also subject to the requirement of Section 1502 of the Dodd-Frank Act and SEC rules related thereto to conduct due diligence and disclose and report on whether certain minerals and metals, known as “conflict minerals,” are contained in our products and whether they originate from the Democratic Republic of Congo and certain adjoining countries. Each year our management team devotes significant time to conduct the required due diligence, and we may face reputational challenges if we determine that certain of our products contain minerals not determined to be conflict free or if we are unable to sufficiently verify the origins of all conflict minerals used in our products through the procedures we implement.
Risks Related to Our Intellectual Property and Information Technology
We depend on computer and telecommunications systems we do not own or control and failures in our systems or a cybersecurity attack or incident relating to our IT systems or technology could significantly disrupt our business operations or result in sensitive customer information being compromised which would negatively materially affect our reputation and/or results of operations.
We have entered into agreements with third parties for hardware, software, telecommunications, and other information technology services in connection with the operation of our business. It is possible we or a third party that we rely on could incur interruptions from a loss of communications, hardware or software failures, a cybersecurity attack, data breach or an incident relating to our IT systems or technology, ransomware, phishing attacks, computer viruses or malware. We believe that we have positive relations with our vendors and maintain adequate anti-virus and malware software and controls; however, any interruptions to our arrangements with third parties, to our computing and communications infrastructure, or to our information systems or any of those operated by a third party that we rely on could significantly disrupt our business operations.
In the current environment, there are numerous and evolving risks to cybersecurity and privacy, including criminal hackers, hacktivists, state-sponsored intrusions, industrial espionage, employee malfeasance and human or technological error. High-profile cybersecurity incidents and data breaches at other companies and in government agencies have increased in recent years, and security industry experts and government officials have warned about the risks of hackers and cyberattacks targeting businesses such as ours. Computer hackers and others routinely attempt to breach the security of technology products, services, and systems, and to fraudulently induce employees, customers, or others to disclosure information or unwittingly provide access to systems or data. A cyberattack of our systems or networks that impairs our information technology systems could disrupt our business operations and result in loss of service to customers, including technical support for our ReWalk devices. While we have certain cybersecurity safeguards in place designed to protect and preserve the integrity of our information technology systems, we have experienced and expect to continue to experience actual or attempted cyberattacks of our IT systems or networks. However, none of these actual or attempted cyberattacks has had a material effect on our operations, business strategy, or financial condition. Although we maintain cyber liability insurance, this insurance may not provide adequate coverage against potential liabilities related to any experienced cybersecurity incident or data breach.
Additionally, we have access to sensitive customer information in the ordinary course of business. If a significant cybersecurity incident occurred, our reputation may be adversely affected, customer confidence may be diminished, or we may be subject to legal claims, any of which may contribute to the loss of customers and have a material adverse effect on us. For more information, see “-Risks Related to Government Regulation” above. If we are found to have violated laws protecting the confidentiality of patient health information, we could be subject to civil or criminal penalties, which could increase our liabilities and harm our reputation or our business.
Our success depends in part on our ability to obtain and maintain protection for the intellectual property relating to or incorporated into our products.
Our success depends in part on our ability to obtain and maintain protection for the intellectual property relating to or incorporated into our products. We seek to protect our intellectual property through a combination of patents, trademarks, confidentiality, and assignment agreements with our employees and certain of our contractors, and confidentiality agreements with certain of our consultants, scientific advisors, and other vendors and contractors. In addition, we rely on trade secret law to protect our proprietary software and product candidates/products in development. For more information, see “Part I, Item 1. Business-Intellectual Property” above.
Our patent position with respect to our exoskeleton and anti-gravity systems can be highly uncertain and involves many new and evolving complex legal, factual, and technical issues. Patent laws and interpretations of those laws are subject to change and any such changes may diminish the value of our patents or narrow the scope of our right to exclude others. In addition, we may fail to apply for or be unable to obtain patents necessary to protect our technology or products from competition or fail to enforce our patents due to lack of information about the exact use of technology or processes by third parties. Also, we cannot be sure that any patents will be granted in a timely manner or at all with respect to any of our patent pending applications or that any patents that are granted will be adequate to exclude others for any significant period of time or at all. Given the foregoing and in order to continue reducing operational expenses in the future, we may invest fewer resources in filing and prosecuting new patents and on maintaining and enforcing various patents, especially in regions where we currently do not focus our market growth strategy.
Litigation to establish or challenge the validity of patents, or to defend against or assert against others infringement, unauthorized use, enforceability, or invalidity, can be lengthy and expensive and may result in our patents being invalidated or interpreted narrowly and restricting our ability to be granted new patents related to our pending patent applications. Even if we prevail, litigation may be time consuming, force us to incur significant costs, and could divert management’s attention from managing our business while any damages or other remedies awarded to us may not be valuable. In addition, U.S. patents and patent applications may be subject to interference proceedings, and U.S. patents may be subject to re-examination and review proceedings in the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. Foreign patents may also be subject to opposition or comparable proceedings in the corresponding foreign patent offices. Any of these proceedings may be expensive and could result in the loss of a patent or denial of a patent application, or the loss or reduction in the scope of one or more of the claims of a patent or patent application.
In addition, we seek to protect our trade secrets, know-how, and confidential information that is not patentable by entering into confidentiality and assignment agreements with our employees and certain of our contractors and confidentiality agreements with certain of our consultants, scientific advisors, and other vendors and contractors. However, we may fail to enter into the necessary agreements, and even if entered into, these agreements may be breached or otherwise fail to prevent disclosure, third-party infringement, or misappropriation of our proprietary information, may be limited as to their term and may not provide an adequate remedy in the event of unauthorized disclosure or use of proprietary information. Enforcing a claim that a third party illegally obtained or is using our trade secrets without authorization may be expensive and time consuming, and the outcome is unpredictable. Some of our employees or consultants may own certain technology which they license to us for a set term. If these technologies are material to our business after the term of the license, our inability to use them could adversely affect our business and profitability.
We also have taken precautions to initiate reasonable safeguards to protect our information technology systems. However, these measures may not be adequate to safeguard our proprietary information, which could lead to the loss or impairment thereof or to expensive litigation to defend our rights against competitors who may be better funded and have superior resources. In addition, unauthorized parties may attempt to copy or reverse engineer certain aspects of our products that we consider proprietary, or our proprietary information may otherwise become known or may be independently developed by our competitors or other third parties. If other parties are able to use our proprietary technology or information, our ability to compete in the market could be harmed. Further, unauthorized use of our intellectual property may have occurred, or may occur in the future, without our knowledge.
If we are unable to obtain or maintain adequate protection for intellectual property, or if any protection is reduced or eliminated, competitors may be able to use our technologies, resulting in harm to our competitive position.
Our patents and proprietary technology and processes may not provide us with a competitive advantage.
Robotics, exoskeletons, and anti-gravity system technologies have been developing rapidly in recent years. We are aware of several other companies developing competing exoskeleton devices for individuals with limited mobility and we expect the level of competition and the pace of development in our industry to increase. Likewise, we are aware of several companies with commercial anti-gravity or treadmill-based gait therapy systems. For more information, see “Part I, Item 1. Business-Competition” above. While we believe our tilt-sensor technology provides a more natural and superior method of exoskeleton activation, which creates a better user experience, as well as that our licensed technology used in our ReStore device is unique and provides better results when compared to other products, a variety of other activation and control methods exist for exoskeletons, several of which are being developed by our competitors, or may be developed in the future. Additionally, while our DAP technology provides what we believe is a superior method for partial weight displacement with strong market acceptance, there may be competitors developing innovative alternative gait therapies that could be introduced in the future. As a result, our patent portfolio and proprietary technology and processes may not provide us with a significant advantage over our competitors, and competitors may be able to design and sell alternative products that are equal to or superior to our products without infringing on our patents. In addition, as our current patents begin to expire, we may lose a competitive advantage over our competitors as we will no longer be able to keep our competitors from practicing the technology covered by the claim of the expired patents. We may also be unable to adequately develop new technologies and obtain future patent protection to preserve a competitive advantage. If we are unable to maintain a competitive advantage, our business and results of operations may be materially adversely affected.
Even in instances where others are found to infringe on our patents, many countries have laws under which a patent owner may be compelled to grant licenses for the use of the patented technology to other parties. In addition, many countries limit the enforceability of patents against other parties, including government agencies or government contractors. In these countries, a patent owner may have limited remedies, which could diminish the value of a patent in those countries. Further, the laws of some countries do not protect intellectual property rights to the same extent as the laws of the United States, particularly in the field of medical products, and effective enforcement in those countries may not be available. The ability of others to market comparable products could adversely affect our business.
We are not able to protect our intellectual property rights in all countries.
Filing, prosecuting, maintaining, and defending patents on each of our products in all countries throughout the world would be prohibitively expensive, and thus our intellectual property rights outside the United States and Europe are limited. In addition, the laws of some foreign countries, especially developing countries, such as China, do not protect intellectual property rights to the same extent as federal and state laws in the United States. Also, it may not be possible to effectively enforce intellectual property rights in some countries at all or to the same extent as in the United States and other countries. Consequently, we are unable to prevent third parties from using our inventions in all countries, or from selling or importing products made using our inventions in the jurisdictions in which we do not have (or are unable to effectively enforce) patent protection. Competitors may use our technologies in jurisdictions where we have not obtained patent protection to develop, market or otherwise commercialize their own products, and we may be unable to prevent those competitors from importing those infringing products into territories where we have patent protection, but enforcement may not be as strong as in the United States. These products may compete with our products and our patents and other intellectual property rights may not be effective or sufficient to prevent them from competing in those jurisdictions. Moreover, strategic partners, competitors, or others in the chain of commerce may raise legal challenges against our intellectual property rights or may infringe upon our intellectual property rights, including through means that may be difficult to prevent or detect.
Many companies have encountered significant problems in protecting and defending intellectual property rights in foreign jurisdictions. Proceedings to enforce our patent rights in the United States or foreign jurisdictions could result in substantial costs and divert our efforts and attention from other aspects of our business, could put our patents at risk of being invalidated or interpreted narrowly and our patent applications at risk of not issuing, and could provoke third parties to assert patent infringement or other claims against us. We may not prevail in any lawsuits that we initiate, and the damages or other remedies awarded, if any, may not be commercially meaningful. Accordingly, our efforts to enforce our intellectual property rights in the United States and around the world may be inadequate to obtain a significant commercial advantage from the intellectual property that we develop or license from third parties.
We may be subject to patent infringement claims, which could result in substantial costs and liability and prevent us from commercializing our current and future products.
The medical device industry is characterized by competing intellectual property and a substantial amount of litigation over patent rights. Our competitors in both the United States and abroad, many of which have substantially greater resources and have made substantial investments in competing technologies, have been issued patents and filed patent applications with respect to their products and processes and may apply for other patents in the future. The large number of patents, the rapid rate of new patent issuances, and the complexities of the technology involved increase the risk of patent litigation.
Determining whether a product infringes a patent involves complex legal and factual issues and the outcome of patent litigation is often uncertain. Even though we have conducted research of issued patents, no assurance can be given that patents containing claims covering our products, technology or methods do not exist, have not been filed or could not be filed or issued. In addition, because patent applications can take years to issue and because publication schedules for pending applications vary by jurisdiction, there may be applications now pending of which we are unaware, and which may result in issued patents that our current or future products infringe. Also, because the claims of published patent applications can change between publication and patent grant, published applications that initially do not appear to be problematic may issue with claims that potentially cover our products, technology, or methods.
Infringement actions and other intellectual property claims brought against us, whether with or without merit, may cause us to incur substantial costs and could place a significant strain on our financial resources, divert the attention of management, and harm our reputation. We cannot be certain that we will successfully defend against any allegations of infringement. If we are found to infringe another party’s patents, we could be required to pay damages. We could also be prevented from selling our infringing products, unless we can obtain a license to use the technology covered by such patents or can redesign our products so that they do not infringe. A license may be available on commercially reasonable terms or none at all, and we may not be able to redesign our products to avoid infringement. Further, any modification to our products could require us to conduct clinical trials and revise our filings with the FDA and other regulatory bodies, which would be time consuming and expensive. In these circumstances, we may not be able to sell our products at competitive prices or at all, and our business and operating results could be harmed.
We rely on trademark protection to distinguish our products from the products of our competitors.
We rely on trademark protection to distinguish our products from the products of our competitors. We currently hold a registered trademark in the United States, Europe, Israel, and the United Kingdom, for the mark ReWalk®. We currently hold a registered trademark in United States, Europe and the United Kingdom for the mark ReStore®. We currently hold the trademarks Alter G™ and Anti-Gravity Treadmill™ in the United States, Canada, and . The trademark Alter G™ is also held in the United Kingdom and Europe. We currently hold the registered trademark Defy Gravity® in the United States. We also hold a registered trademark for Lifeward® in Europe, the United Kingdom, and Israel. The application to register the trademark Lifeward™ is pending in the United States. In jurisdictions where we have not registered our trademark and are using it, and as permitted by applicable local law, we rely on common law trademark protection. Third parties may oppose our trademark applications, or otherwise challenge our use of the trademarks, and may be able to use our trademarks in jurisdictions where they are not registered or otherwise protected by law. If our trademarks are successfully challenged or if a third party is using confusingly similar or identical trademarks in particular jurisdictions before we do, we could be forced to rebrand our products, which could result in loss of brand recognition, and could require us to devote additional resources to marketing new brands. If others are able to use our trademarks, our ability to distinguish our products may be impaired, which could adversely affect our business. Further, we cannot assure you that competitors will not infringe upon our trademarks, or that we will have adequate resources to enforce our trademarks.
We may be subject to damages resulting from claims that our employees or we have wrongfully used or disclosed alleged trade secrets of their former employers.
Many of our employees were previously employed at other medical device companies, including our competitors or potential competitors, and we may hire employees in the future that are so employed. We could in the future be subject to claims that these employees, or we, have inadvertently or otherwise used or disclosed trade secrets or other proprietary information of their former employers. If we fail in defending against such claims, a court could order us to pay substantial damages and prohibit us from using technologies or features that are found to incorporate or be derived from the trade secrets or other proprietary information of the former employers. If any of these technologies or features that are important to our products, this could prevent us from selling those products and could have a material adverse effect on our business. Even if we are successful in defending against these claims, such litigation could result in substantial costs and divert the attention of management.
Risks Related to Ownership of Our Ordinary Shares
Sales of a substantial number of ordinary shares by us or our large shareholders, certain of whom may have registration rights, or dilutive exercises of a substantial number of warrants by our warrant-holders could adversely affect the value of our ordinary shares.
Sales by us or our shareholders of a substantial number of ordinary shares in the public market, or the perception that these sales might occur, could cause the value of our ordinary shares to decline or could impair our ability to raise capital through a future sale of our equity securities. Additionally, dilutive exercises of a substantial number of warrants by our warrant-holders, or the perception that such exercises may occur, could put downward price on the market price of our ordinary shares.
As of March 7, 2025, 4,288,801 ordinary shares were issuable pursuant to the exercise of warrants, with exercise prices ranging from $2.75 to $32.05 per warrant, issued in private and registered offerings of ordinary shares and warrants in July 2020, December 2020, February 2021, September 2021 and January 2025. We have registered with the SEC all of these warrants and/or the resale of the shares issuable upon their exercise. There were also 953 ordinary shares issuable pursuant to the exercise of warrants granted to Kreos Capital V (Expert Fund) Limited (“Kreos”), in connection with the loan agreement we signed with Kreos on December 30, 2015 (the “Loan Agreement”) in January and December 2016, with an exercise price that is set to $52.50 per warrant. For more information, “Part I, Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations-Liquidity and Capital Resources-Equity Raises”, below.
All shares sold pursuant to an offering covered by a registration statement would be freely transferable. With respect to the outstanding warrants, there may be certain restrictions on the holders to sell the underlying ordinary shares to the extent they are restricted securities, held by “affiliates” or would exceed certain ownership thresholds. Certain of our largest shareholders, may also have limitations under Rule 144 under the Securities Act on the resale of certain ordinary shares they hold unless they are registered for resale under the Securities Act. Despite these limitations and the liquidity that we may gain from cash exercises of outstanding warrants, if we, our existing shareholders, or their affiliates sell a substantial number of the above-mentioned ordinary shares in the public market, the market price of our ordinary shares could decrease significantly. Shareholders may also incur substantial dilution if holders of our warrants exercise their warrants to purchase ordinary shares, which could lower the market price of our ordinary shares. Any such decrease could impair the value of your investment in us.
Future grants of ordinary shares under our equity incentive plans to our employees, non-employee directors and consultants, or sales by these individuals in the public market, could result in substantial dilution, thus decreasing the value of your investment in our ordinary shares, and certain grants may also require shareholder approval. In addition, stockholders will experience dilution upon the exercise of outstanding warrants.
We have historically used, and continue to use, our ordinary shares as a means of both rewarding our employees, non-employee directors, and consultants and aligning their interests with those of our shareholders. As of August 19, 2024, we could not grant any awards under our 2014 Incentive Compensation Plan, as amended. As of December 31, 2024, 331,816 ordinary shares were subject to outstanding awards (consisting of outstanding options to purchase 4,573 ordinary shares and 327,243 ordinary shares underlying unvested RSUs). For more information, see Note 9b to our consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2024, below.
Additionally, to the extent registered on a Form S-8, ordinary shares granted or issued under our equity incentive plans will, subject to vesting provisions, lock-up restrictions, and Rule 144 volume limitations applicable to our “affiliates,” be available for sale in the open market immediately upon registration. Further, as of December 31, 2024, there were 2,380,701 ordinary shares underlying issued and outstanding warrants, which if exercised for ordinary shares, could decrease the net tangible book value of our ordinary shares and cause dilution to our existing shareholders. Sales of a substantial number of the above-mentioned ordinary shares in the public market could result in a significant decrease in the market price of our ordinary shares and have a material adverse effect on an investment in our ordinary shares.
If we are unable to offer our key management personnel long-term incentive compensation, including options, and restricted stock units, as part of their total compensation package, we may have difficulty retaining such personnel, which would adversely affect our operations and financial performance.
As previously disclosed, in connection with our 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (the “2024 Annual Meeting”), our proposal to adopt a new equity incentive plan did not receive the requisite shareholder approval. Further, we intended to hold an Extraordinary General Meeting of Shareholders in January 2025 to adopt a new equity incentive plan. However, we ultimately cancelled such meeting. We intend to present a proposal for a new equity plan at a subsequent meeting in 2025, but no assurances can be made that such proposal will receive the requisite shareholder approval. If we are limited in our ability to grant equity compensation awards, we will need to explore offering other compelling alternatives to supplement our compensation, including long-term cash compensation plans or significantly increased short-term cash compensation, in order to continue to attract and retain key management personnel. If we used these alternatives to long-term equity awards, our compensation costs could increase and our financial performance could be adversely affected. If we are unable to offer key management personnel long-term incentive compensation, including stock options or restricted stock units, as part of their total compensation package, we may have difficulty attracting and retaining such personnel, which would adversely affect our operations and financial performance.
If we do not meet the expectations of equity research analysts, if any, if the equity analysts following our business do not continue to publish research or reports about our business, or if the analyst issues unfavorable commentary or a downgrade of the rating on our ordinary shares, the price of our ordinary shares could decline. Additionally, we may fail to meet publicly announced financial guidance or other expectations about our business, which could cause our ordinary shares to decline in value.
There are currently three equity analysts publishing research reports about our business, and we are currently seeking to attract additional coverage. If our results of operations are below the analysts’ consensus financial estimates, our share price could decline. Moreover, the price of our ordinary shares could decline if one or more securities analysts downgrade the rating on our ordinary shares or if analysts issue other unfavourable commentary or stop publishing research or reports about us or our business (as has occurred over time, with a decrease in the number of analysts following us from five in 2014 to one in 2022). Given that there are only three analysts that currently cover our business, we face an increased risk that the evaluation of our business by any one of the analysts, if less than positive, will cause a larger decline in our stock price than would otherwise be the case if we had a greater number of analysts covering our business.
From time to time, we have also faced difficulty accurately projecting our earnings and have missed certain of our publicly announced guidance. If our financial results for a particular period do not meet our guidance or if we reduce our guidance for future periods, the market price of our ordinary shares may decline.
We are a “smaller reporting company” and the reduced reporting requirements applicable to such companies may make our ordinary shares less attractive to investors.
We are a “smaller reporting company” as defined in Item 10(f)(1) of Regulation S-K, which allows us to take advantage of certain scaled disclosure requirements available specifically to smaller reporting companies. For example, we may continue to use reduced compensation disclosure obligations, and, provided we are also a “non-accelerated filer,” we will not be obligated to follow the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. We will remain a smaller reporting company until the last day of the fiscal year in which we have at least $100 million in revenue and at least $700 million in aggregate market value of ordinary shares held by non-affiliated persons and entities (known as “public float”), or, alternatively, if our revenue exceed $100 million, until the last day of the fiscal year in which our public float was at least $250.0 million (in each case, with respect to public float, as measured as of the last business day of the second quarter of such fiscal year). For the year ended December 31, 2024, we recorded revenue of approximately $25.7 million.
We cannot predict or otherwise determine if investors will find our securities less attractive as a result of our reliance on exemptions as a smaller reporting company and/or “non-accelerated filer.” If some investors find our securities less attractive as a result, there may be a less active trading market for our ordinary shares and the price of our ordinary shares may be more volatile.
We are subject to ongoing costs and risks associated with determining whether our existing internal controls over financial reporting systems are compliant with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, and if we fail to achieve and maintain adequate internal controls it could have a material adverse effect on our stated results of operations and harm our reputation.
We are required to comply with the internal control, evaluation, and certification requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, which requires us to furnish a report by management on, among other things, the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. Once we no longer qualify as a “smaller reporting company” and “non-accelerated filer,” our independent registered public accounting firm will need to attest to the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting under Section 404. When our independent registered public accounting firm is required to undertake an assessment of our internal control over financial reporting, the cost of our compliance with Section 404 will correspondingly increase. Our compliance with applicable provisions of Section 404 will require that we incur substantial accounting expense and expend significant management time on compliance-related issues as we implement additional corporate governance practices and comply with reporting requirements. Moreover, if we are not able to comply with the requirements of Section 404 applicable to us in a timely manner, or if we or our independent registered public accounting firm identifies deficiencies in our internal control over financial reporting that are deemed to be material weaknesses, the market price of our stock could decline and we could be subject to sanctions or investigations by the SEC or other regulatory authorities, which would require additional financial and management resources.
The process of determining whether our existing internal controls over financial reporting systems are compliant with Section 404 and whether there are any material weaknesses or significant deficiencies in our existing internal controls requires the investment of substantial time and resources, including by our Chief Financial Officer and other members of our senior management. This determination and any remedial actions required could divert internal resources and take a significant amount of time and effort to complete and could result in us incurring additional costs that we did not anticipate, including the hiring of outside consultants. We could experience higher than anticipated operating expenses and higher independent auditor fees during and after the implementation of these changes.
Irrespective of compliance with Section 404, any failure of our internal controls could have a material adverse effect on our stated results of operations and harm our reputation. If we are unable to implement any of the required changes to our internal control over financial reporting effectively or efficiently or are required to do so earlier than anticipated, it could adversely affect our operations, financial reporting and/or results of operations and could result in an adverse opinion on internal controls from our management and our independent auditors. Further, if our internal control over financial reporting is not effective, the reliability of our financial statements may be questioned, and our share price may suffer.
U.S. holders of our ordinary shares may suffer adverse U.S. tax consequences if we are characterized as a passive foreign investment company, or a PFIC, under Section 1297(a) of the Code.
Generally, if for any taxable year 75% or more of our gross income is passive income, or at least 50% of the average quarterly value of our assets (which may be determined in part by the market value of our ordinary shares, which is subject to change) are held for the production of, or produce passive income, we would be characterized as a passive foreign investment company, or PFIC, for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Passive income for this purpose generally includes, among other things, certain dividends, interest, royalties, rents, and gains from commodities and securities transactions and from the sale or exchange of property that gives rise to passive income. Passive income also includes amounts derived by reason of the temporary investment of funds, including those raised in an offering. In determining whether a non-U.S. corporation is a PFIC, a proportionate share of the income and assets of each corporation in which it owns, directly or indirectly, at least a 25% interest (by value) is taken into account.
The determination of whether we are a PFIC will depend on the nature and composition of our income and the nature, composition, and value of our assets from time to time. The 50% passive asset test described above is generally based on the fair market value of each asset, with the value of goodwill and going concern value determined in large part by reference to the market value of our ordinary shares, which may be volatile. If we are characterized as a “controlled foreign corporation,” or a “CFC”, under Section 957(a) of the Code and not considered publicly traded throughout the relevant taxable year, however, the passive asset test may be applied based on the adjusted tax bases of our assets instead of the fair market value of each asset (as described above). However, if we are treated as publicly traded for at least 20 trading days during the relevant taxable year, our assets would generally be required to be measured at their fair market value, even if we are a CFC.
Based on our gross income and assets, the market price of our ordinary shares, and the nature of our business, we believe that we were not a PFIC for the taxable year ended December 31, 2024. However, this determination is subject to uncertainty. In addition, there is a significant risk that we may be a PFIC for future taxable years, unless the market price of our ordinary shares increases, or we reduce the amount of cash and other passive assets we hold relative to the amount of non-passive assets we hold. Accordingly, no assurances can be made regarding our PFIC status in one or more subsequent years, and we express no opinion with respect to our PFIC status in the taxable year ended December 31, 2024, or the current year 2025, and also expresses no opinion with respect to our predictions or past determinations regarding our PFIC status in the past or in the future.
If we are characterized as a PFIC, U.S. holders of our ordinary shares may suffer adverse tax consequences, including having gains realized on the sale of our ordinary shares treated as ordinary income, rather than capital gain, the loss of the preferential tax rate applicable to dividends received on our ordinary shares by individuals who are U.S. holders and having interest charges apply to distributions by us and to the proceeds of sales of our ordinary shares. In addition, special information reporting may be required. Certain elections exist that may alleviate some of the adverse consequences of PFIC status and would result in an alternative treatment (such as mark-to-market treatment or being able to make a qualified electing fund election). However, we do not intend to provide the information necessary for U.S. Holders to make qualified electing fund elections if we are classified as a PFIC.
Additionally, if we are characterized as a PFIC, for any taxable year during which a U.S. holder holds ordinary shares, we generally will continue to be treated as a PFIC with respect to such U.S. holder for all succeeding years during which such U.S. holder holds ordinary shares unless we cease to be a PFIC and such U.S. holder makes a “deemed sale” election with respect to such ordinary shares. If such election is made, such U.S. holder will be deemed to have sold such ordinary shares held by such U.S. holder at their fair market value on the last day of the last taxable year in which we qualified as a PFIC, and any gain from such deemed sale would be treated as described above.
Each U.S. holder of our ordinary shares is strongly urged to consult his, her or its tax advisor regarding the application of these rules and the availability of any potential elections.
The price of our ordinary shares may be volatile, and you may lose all or part of your investment.
The market price of our ordinary shares has been in the past, and could continue to be, highly volatile and may fluctuate substantially as a result of many factors. Moreover, while there is no established public trading market for the warrants offered in our follow-on public offerings, and we do not expect one to develop, our ordinary shares will be issuable pursuant to exercise of these warrants. Because the warrants are exercisable into our ordinary shares, volatility, or a reduction in the market price of our ordinary shares could have an adverse effect on the trading price of the warrants. Factors which may cause fluctuations in the price of our ordinary shares include, but are not limited to:
●
actual or anticipated fluctuations in our growth rate or results of operations or those of our competitors;
●
customer acceptance of our products;
●
announcements by us or our competitors of new products or services, commercial relationships, acquisitions, or expansion plans;
●
announcements by us or our competitors of other material developments;
●
our involvement in litigation;
●
changes in government regulation applicable to us and our products;
●
sales, or the anticipation of sales, of our ordinary shares, warrants and debt securities by us, or sales of our ordinary shares by our insiders or other shareholders, including upon expiration of contractual lock-up agreements;
●
developments with respect to intellectual property rights;
●
competition from existing or new technologies and products;
●
changes in key personnel;
●
the trading volume of our ordinary shares;
●
changes in the estimation of the future size and growth rate of our markets;
●
changes in our quarterly or annual forecasts with respect to operating results and financial conditions;
●
general economic and market conditions and;
●
announcements regarding business acquisitions.
In addition, the stock markets have experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations. Broad market and industry factors may materially harm the market price of our ordinary shares, regardless of our operating performance. Technical factors in the public trading market for our ordinary shares may produce price movements that may or may not comport with macro, industry or Company-specific fundamentals, including, without limitation, the sentiment of retail investors (including as may be expressed on financial trading and other social media sites), the amount and status of short interest in our securities, access to margin debt, trading in options and other derivatives on our ordinary shares and any related hedging or other technical trading factors. In the past, following periods of volatility in the market price of a company’s securities, securities class action litigation has often been instituted against that company, as was the case for ReWalk in a securities class action dismissed in full in November 2020. If we become involved in any similar litigation, we could incur substantial costs and our management’s attention and resources could be diverted.
Risks Related to Our Incorporation and Location in Israel
Conditions in Israel, including Israel's wars against Hamas and other terrorist organizations in the Gaza Strip and against Hezbollah on Israel's northern border, may materially and adversely affect our business and results of operations.
We are incorporated under the laws of the State of Israel, and certain of our facilities, primarily of the operations, quality, and R&D functions of the legacy ReWalk business and some finance functions, are located in Israel. Accordingly, political, economic and military conditions in Israel and the surrounding region directly affect our business and operations and could materially and adversely affect our ability to continue to operate from Israel. Since the State of Israel was established in 1948, a number of armed conflicts have occurred between Israel and its Arab neighbors. Terrorism and violence within Israel or the outbreak of conflicts between Israel and its neighbors, including the Palestinians, Iran, and terrorist organizations operating in the region, may adversely affect our business, operations, or personnel. Most recently, on October 7, 2023, Hamas, a terrorist organization primarily based in the Gaza Strip, launched a series of attacks on Israel. As a result of such attacks, on October 8, 2023, Israel officially declared a state of war. Israel called up substantial numbers of reservists and responded with extensive aerial attacks and a broad ground attack on terrorist targets in Gaza. The hostilities continued until a ceasefire between the sides took effect in mid-January 2025, but there is no certainty that this ceasefire will be sustained.
Following the attack by Hamas on Israel’s southern border, Hezbollah, a terrorist organization based primarily in Lebanon, also launched missile, rocket, and shooting attacks against Israeli military sites, troops, and civilian areas in northern Israel. In response to these attacks, the Israeli army initially carried out targeted strikes on Hezbollah in southern Lebanon and targets in Syria, followed by a ground incursion into southern Lebanon beginning in late September 2024. A ceasefire between Israel and Hezbollah came into effect in late November 2024, but there is no certainty that this ceasefire will be sustained.
Iran also joined the hostilities with several significant missile attacks against Israel, and the Houthis, a terrorist organization based in Yemen, fired missiles at Israel and sent unmanned aerial vehicles carrying explosives to Israel. Terrorist groups have also attacked U.S. military targets in the Middle East. These clashes may escalate into a greater regional conflict.
Although the current conflict in Israel has not materially impacted our business or operations as of the date of this Annual Report, the conflict is rapidly evolving and developing and it is not possible to predict its long-term consequences, which could include further regional instability, geopolitical shifts and adverse effects on trade between Israel and its trading partners, macroeconomic conditions, security conditions and financial markets. Any escalation and expansion of this conflict could have a negative impact on both global and regional conditions and may adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. Additionally, in the event that our facilities in northern Israel are damaged as a result of hostile action or that hostilities otherwise disrupt the ongoing operation of our facilities, our ability to continue our operations could be materially adversely affected.
Further, in the past, the State of Israel and Israeli companies have been subjected to economic boycotts. Several countries still restrict doing business with Israel and Israeli companies, and additional countries may impose restrictions on doing business with Israel and Israeli companies as a result of hostilities in Israel or political instability in the region. In addition, prior to the terrorist attack in October 2023, the Israeli government pursued extensive changes to Israel’s judicial system, which sparked extensive political debate and unrest. These political events and policies, or a significant downturn in the economic or financial condition of Israel, could materially and adversely affect our operations and product development.
Many of our employees and independent contractors who reside in Israel are required to perform military reserve duty, which may disrupt their work for us.
Approximately 23% of our employees are located in Israel. Many of our employees and independent contractors in Israel may be called upon to perform several days of military reserve duty annually until they reach the age of 40 (and in some cases, depending on their military duties up to the age of 45 or even 49) and, in emergency circumstances, could be called to immediate and unlimited active duty (subject to approval by the Israeli government). Although to date none of our Israeli employees have been mobilized for emergency military service, we cannot predict whether there will be further mobilization of reservists and any further mobilization could further impact our employees, including employees who serve in critical roles in our company, which materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our technology development and quality headquarters and the manufacturing facility for our ReWalk products are located in Israel and, therefore, our results may be adversely affected by economic restrictions imposed on, and political and military instability in, Israel.
Our technology development and quality headquarters, which houses substantially all of our research and development and our core research and development team, including engineers, machinists, and quality and regulatory personnel, as well as the facility of our contract manufacturer, Sanmina, are located in Israel. Many of our employees, directors and officers are residents of Israel. Accordingly, political, economic, and military conditions in Israel and the surrounding region may directly affect our business. Since the establishment of the State of Israel in 1948, a number of armed conflicts have taken place between Israel and its Arab neighbors, Hamas, Hezbollah and other armed groups. Any hostilities involving Israel or the interruption or curtailment of trade within Israel or between Israel and its trading partners could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations and could make it more difficult for us to raise capital. In particular, an interruption of operations at the Tel Aviv airport related to the conflict in the Gaza Strip or otherwise could prevent or delay shipments of our components or products. Although we maintain inventory in the United States and Germany, an extended interruption could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Recent political uprisings, social unrest, and violence in various countries in the Middle East and North Africa, including Israel’s neighbors Syria and Lebanon, are affecting the political stability of those countries. This instability may lead to deterioration of the political relationships that exist between Israel and these countries and has raised concerns regarding security in the region and the potential for armed conflict. Our commercial insurance covers some, but not all, losses that may occur as a result of an event associated with the security situation in the Middle East. Any losses or damages incurred by us could have a material adverse effect on our business. In addition, Iran has threatened to attack Israel and is widely believed to be developing nuclear weapons. Iran is also believed to have a strong influence among parties hostile to Israel in areas that border Israel, such as Hamas in Gaza and Hezbollah in Lebanon. Any armed conflicts, terrorist activities or political instability in the region could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Our operations and the operations of our contract manufacturer, Sanmina, may be disrupted as a result of the obligation of Israeli citizens to perform military service.
Many Israeli citizens are obligated to perform one month, and in some cases more, of annual military reserve duty until they reach the age of 45 (or older, for reservists with certain occupations) and, in the event of a military conflict, may be called to active duty. In response to terrorist activity, there have been periods of significant call-ups of military reservists. Some of our executive officers and employees, as well as those of Sanmina, the manufacturer of all of our ReWalk products, are required to perform annual military reserve duty in Israel and may be called to active duty at any time under emergency circumstances. As described in the risk factor above entitled “Conditions in Israel, including Israel’s wars against Hamas and other terrorist organizations in the Gaza Strip and against Hezbollah on Israel’s northern border, may materially and adversely affect our business and results of operations,” in response to the attacks by Hamas and Hezbollah on Israel in October 2023 Israel has called up substantial numbers of reservists. Although to date these call-ups have not had a material impact on our operations or on Sanmina’s ability to manufacture our products, we cannot predict whether there will be further mobilization of reservists and our operations and the operations of Sanmina could be disrupted by such call-ups.
Our sales may be adversely affected by boycotts of Israel.
Several countries, principally in the Middle East, restrict doing business with Israel and Israeli companies, and additional countries may impose restrictions on doing business with Israel and Israeli companies whether as a result of hostilities in the region or otherwise. In addition, there have been increased efforts by activists to cause companies and consumers to boycott Israeli goods based on Israeli government policies. Such actions, particularly if they become more widespread, may adversely impact our ability to sell our products.
The tax benefits that are available to us require us to continue to meet various conditions and may be terminated or reduced in the future, which could increase our costs and taxes.
Some of our operations in Israel, referred to as “Beneficiary Enterprises,” carry certain tax benefits under the Israeli Law for the Encouragement of Capital Investments, 5719-1959, or the Investment Law. Substantially all of our future income before taxes can be attributed to these programs. If we do not meet the requirements for maintaining these benefits or if our assumptions regarding the key elements affecting our tax rates are rejected by the tax authorities, they may be reduced or cancelled, and the relevant operations would be subject to Israeli corporate tax at the standard rate. In addition to being subject to the standard corporate tax rate, we could be required to refund any tax benefits that we may receive in the future, plus interest and penalties thereon. Even if we continue to meet the relevant requirements, the tax benefits that our current “Beneficiary Enterprises” receive may not be continued in the future at their current levels or at all. If these tax benefits were reduced or eliminated, the amount of taxes that we pay would likely increase, as all of our Israeli operations would consequently be subject to corporate tax at the standard rate, which could adversely affect our results of operations. Additionally, if we increase our activities outside of Israel, for example, by way of acquisitions, our increased activities may not be eligible for inclusion in Israeli tax benefit programs. For a discussion of our current tax obligations, see “Part II. Item 7, Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”
We have received Israeli government grants for certain of our research and development activities and we may receive additional grants in the future. The terms of those grants restrict our ability to manufacture products or transfer technologies outside of Israel, and we may be required to pay penalties in such cases or upon the sale of our company.
From our inception through December 31, 2024, we received a total of $2.8 million from the IIA. We may in the future apply to receive additional grants from the IIA to support our research and development activities. With respect to some grants that were royalty-bearing grants, we are committed to paying royalties at a rate of 3.0% on sales proceeds up to the total amount of grants received, linked to the dollar, and bearing interest at an annual rate of SOFRPR applicable to dollar deposits. Even after payment in full of these amounts, we will still be required to comply with the requirements of the Israeli Encouragement of Industrial Research, Development and Technological Innovation Law, 1984, or the R&D Law, and related regulations, with respect to those past grants. When a company develops know-how, technology or products using IIA grants, the terms of these grants and the R&D Law restrict the transfer outside of Israel of such know-how, and of the manufacturing or manufacturing rights of such products, technologies, or know-how, without the prior approval of the IIA. Therefore, if aspects of our technologies are deemed to have been developed with IIA funding, the discretionary approval of an IIA committee would be required for any transfer to third parties outside of Israel of know-how or manufacturing or manufacturing rights related to those aspects of such technologies. Furthermore, the IIA may impose certain conditions on any arrangement under which it permits us to transfer technology or development out of Israel or may not grant such approvals at all.
Furthermore, the consideration available to our shareholders in a future transaction involving the transfer outside of Israel of technology or know-how developed with IIA funding (such as a merger or similar transaction) may be reduced by any amounts that we are required to pay to the IIA.
In addition to the above, any non-Israeli citizen, resident or entity that, among other things, (i) becomes a holder of 5% or more of our share capital or voting rights, (ii) is entitled to appoint one or more of our directors or our chief executive officer or (iii) serves as one of our directors or as our chief executive officer (including holders of 25% or more of the voting power, equity or the right to nominate directors in such direct holder, if applicable) is required to notify the IIA and undertake to comply with the rules and regulations applicable to the grant programs of the IIA, including the restrictions on transfer described above. Such notification will be required in connection with the investment being made by an investor which may discourage or limit investments from foreign investors in our company.
We may become subject to claims for remuneration or royalties for assigned service invention rights by our employees, which could result in litigation and adversely affect our business.
A significant portion of our intellectual property has been developed by our employees in the course of their employment for us. Under the Israeli Patent Law, 5727-1967 (the “Patent Law”) and recent decisions by the Israeli Supreme Court and the Israeli Compensation and Royalties Committee, a body constituted under the Patent Law, employees may be entitled to remuneration for intellectual property that they develop for us unless they explicitly waive any such rights. Although we enter into agreements with our employees pursuant to which they agree that any inventions created in the scope of their employment or engagement are owned exclusively by us, we may face claims demanding remuneration. As a consequence of such claims, we could be required to pay additional remuneration or royalties to our current and former employees, or be forced to litigate such claims, which could negatively affect our business.
Provisions of Israeli law and our Articles of Association may delay, prevent, or otherwise impede a merger with, or an acquisition of, us, even when the terms of such a transaction are favorable to us and our shareholders.
Israeli corporate law regulates mergers, requires tender offers for acquisitions of shares above specified thresholds, requires special approvals for transactions involving directors, officers or significant shareholders and regulates other matters that may be relevant to such types of transactions. For example, a tender offer for all of a company’s issued and outstanding shares can only be completed if the acquirer receives positive responses from the holders of at least 95% of the issued share capital. Completion of the tender offer also requires approval of a majority of the offerees that do not have a personal interest in the tender offer, unless at least 98% of the company’s outstanding shares are tendered. Furthermore, the shareholders, including those who indicated their acceptance of the tender offer (unless the acquirer stipulated in its tender offer that a shareholder that accepts the offer may not seek appraisal rights), may, at any time within six months following the completion of the tender offer, petition an Israeli court to alter the consideration for the acquisition. Israeli law also requires a “special tender offer” in certain cases where a shareholder crosses the 25% or 45% holding threshold, and it imposes procedural and special voting requirements for the approval of a merger in certain cases.
Our Articles of Association provide that our directors (other than external directors, a requirement of Israeli corporate law from which we have opted out in accordance with an exemption for which we are currently eligible) are elected on a staggered basis, such that a potential acquirer cannot readily replace our entire board of directors at a single annual general shareholder meeting. This could prevent a potential acquirer from receiving board approval for an acquisition proposal that our board of directors opposes.
Furthermore, Israeli tax considerations may make potential transactions unappealing to us or to our shareholders whose country of residence does not have a tax treaty with Israel exempting such shareholders from Israeli tax. For example, Israeli tax law does not recognize tax-free share exchanges to the same extent as U.S. tax law. With respect to mergers involving an exchange of shares, Israeli tax law allows for tax deferral in certain circumstances but makes the deferral contingent on the fulfilment of a number of conditions, including, in some cases, a holding period of two years from the date of the transaction during which sales and dispositions of shares of the participating companies are subject to certain restrictions. Moreover, with respect to certain share swap transactions, the tax deferral is limited in time, and when such time expires, the tax becomes payable even if no disposition of the shares has occurred. These and other similar provisions could delay, prevent or impede an acquisition of us or our merger with another company, even if such an acquisition or merger would be beneficial to us or to our shareholders.
It may be difficult to enforce a judgment of a U.S. court against us, our officers, and directors, to assert U.S. securities laws claims in Israel or to serve process on our officers and directors.
We are incorporated in Israel. Although the majority of our directors and executive officers reside within the United States and most of the assets of these persons are also likely located within the United States, some of our directors and executive officers reside and may have the majority of their assets outside the United States. Additionally, most of our assets are located outside of the United States. Therefore, a judgment obtained against us, or those of our directors and executive officers residing outside of the United States, including a judgment based on the civil liability provisions of the U.S. federal securities laws, may not be collectible in the United States and may not be enforced by an Israeli court. It also may be difficult for you to effect service of process in the United States on those directors and executive officers residing outside of the United States or to assert U.S. securities law claims in original actions instituted in Israel. Israeli courts may refuse to hear a claim based on an alleged violation of U.S. securities laws reasoning that Israel is not the most appropriate forum in which to bring such a claim. In addition, even if an Israeli court agrees to hear a claim, it may determine that Israeli law and not U.S. law is applicable to the claim. If U.S. law is found to be applicable, the content of applicable U.S. law must be proven as a fact by expert witnesses, which can be a time-consuming and costly process. Certain matters of procedure will also be governed by Israeli law. There is little binding case law in Israel that addresses the matters described above. As a result of the difficulty associated with enforcing a judgment against us in Israel, you may be able to collect only limited, or may be unable to collect any, damages awarded by either a U.S. or foreign court.
In April 2021, we amended our articles of association such that, unless we consent in writing to the selection of an alternative forum, (i) the federal courts of the United States will be the exclusive forum for the resolution of any claim arising under the Securities Act, and (ii) the Tel-Aviv District Court will be the exclusive forum for (a) a derivative action or derivative proceeding that is filed in the name of the Company; (b) any action grounded in a breach of fiduciary duty of a director, officeholder or other employee towards us or our shareholders; or (c) any action the cause of which results from any provision of the Companies Law or the Israel Securities Law, 5728-1968. We have retained the ability to consent to an alternative forum in circumstances if we determine shareholder interests are best served by permitting a particular dispute to proceed in a forum other than the federal district courts or State of Israel, as applicable. However, there is uncertainty as to whether a court would enforce these provisions.
Your rights and responsibilities as a shareholder will be governed by Israeli law, which differs in some material respects from the rights and responsibilities of shareholders of U.S. companies.
The rights and responsibilities of the holders of our ordinary shares are governed by our Articles of Association and by Israeli law. These rights and responsibilities differ in some material respects from the rights and responsibilities of shareholders in U.S.-based corporations. In particular, a shareholder of an Israeli company has a duty to act in good faith and in a customary manner in exercising its rights and performing its obligations towards the company and other shareholders, and to refrain from abusing its power in the company, including, among other things, in voting at a general meeting of shareholders on matters such as amendments to a company’s articles of association, increases in a company’s authorized share capital, mergers and acquisitions and related party transactions requiring shareholder approval. In addition, a shareholder who is aware that it possesses the power to determine the outcome of a shareholder vote or to appoint or prevent the appointment of a director or executive officer in the company has a duty of fairness toward the company. There is limited case law available to assist us in understanding the nature of this duty or the implications of these provisions. These provisions may be interpreted to impose additional obligations and liabilities on holders of our ordinary shares that are not typically imposed on shareholders of U.S. corporations.
Our business could be negatively affected as a result of actions of activist shareholders, which could be disruptive and costly and may impact the trading value of our securities.
We value constructive input from investors and regularly engage in dialogue with our shareholders regarding strategy and performance. While our Board of Directors and management team welcome their views and opinions with the goal of enhancing value for all shareholders, we may be subject to actions or proposals from activist shareholders that may not align with our business strategies or the best interests of all of our shareholders.
For example, in connection with our 2024 Annual Meeting, we received an email from counsel to Creative Value Capital Limited Partnership, which claims to be a beneficial shareholder of our company (the “Shareholder”), demanding that we add to the agenda of the 2024 Annual Meeting the election of two candidates proposed by the Shareholder for our Board of Directors (the “Purported Agenda Supplement Notice”). We determined that the Purported Agenda Supplement Notice was invalid, as the Shareholder failed to demonstrate that it owns at least 5% of our outstanding voting power, as required by the applicable regulations in order to nominate a candidate for director and accordingly, we rejected such Purported Agenda Supplement Notice on those grounds as well as others. As a result, the Shareholder filed a legal action in the Nazareth District Court (the “Court”) seeking a judgment ordering us to add to the agenda of the 2024 Annual Meeting a proposal relating to the election of the Shareholder’s two candidates for our Board of Directors. On August 26, 2024, the Court held a hearing on this matter and dismissed the Shareholder’s motion with prejudice. Also, in connection with our 2022 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders, the Shareholder nominated two candidates for election to our board of directors and submitted two additional proposals (including amendments to our Articles of Association) for approval at the meeting. Although none of CVC’s proposals were approved at the meeting, addressing and responding to such proposals was significantly costly and time-consuming, and diverted the attention of our management and employees.
Responding to these types of actions by activist shareholders is costly and time-consuming and may disrupt our operations and divert the attention of management and our employees. Such activities could interfere with our ability to execute our strategic plan. In addition, a proxy contest for the election of directors at our annual meeting would require us to incur significant legal fees and proxy solicitation expenses and require significant time and attention by management and our Board of Directors. The perceived uncertainties as to our future direction also could affect the market price and volatility of our securities.
General Risks
Exchange rate fluctuations between the U.S. dollar, the euro and the NIS may negatively affect our earnings.
The U.S. dollar is our functional and reporting currency. However, we pay a significant portion of our expenses in NIS and in euro, and we expect this to continue. As a result, we are exposed to exchange rate risks that may materially and adversely affect our financial results. Accordingly, any appreciation of the NIS or euro relative to the U.S. dollar would adversely impact our net loss or net income, if any. For example, if the NIS appreciates against the U.S. dollar or if the value of the NIS declines against the U.S. dollar at a time when the rate of inflation in the cost of Israeli goods and services exceeds the rate of decline in the relative value of the NIS, then the U.S. dollar cost of our operations in Israel would increase and our results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.
Our operations also could be adversely affected if we are unable to effectively hedge against currency fluctuations in the future.
We cannot predict any future trends in the rate of inflation in Israel or the rate of devaluation (if any) of the NIS against the U.S. dollar. For example, while the NIS devalued against the U.S. dollar at a rate of approximately 0.6%, 3.1% and 4% during the fiscal year 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively. The Israeli annual rate of inflation amounted to 3.2%, 2.96% and 5.3% for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively.
We have in the past engaged in limited hedging activities, and we may enter into other hedging arrangements with financial institutions from time to time. Any hedging strategies that we may implement in the future to mitigate currency risks, such as forward contracts, options and foreign exchange swaps related to transaction exposures may not eliminate our exposure to foreign exchange fluctuations.
We are subject to certain regulatory regimes that may affect the way that we conduct business internationally, and our failure to comply with applicable laws and regulations could materially adversely affect our reputation and result in penalties and increased costs.
We are subject to a complex system of laws and regulations related to international trade, including economic sanctions and export control laws and regulations. We also depend on our distributors and agents for compliance and adherence to local laws and regulations in the markets in which they operate. Significant political or regulatory developments in the jurisdictions in which we sell our products, such as those stemming from the presidential administration in the United States or the U.K.’s exit from the E.U., are difficult to predict and may have a material adverse effect on us. For example, in the United States, the prior Trump administration imposed tariffs on imports from China, Mexico, Canada, and other countries, and expressed support for greater restrictions on free trade and increase tariffs on goods imported into the United States. Changes in U.S. political, regulatory, and economic conditions or in its policies governing international trade and foreign manufacturing and investment in the United States could adversely affect our sales in the United States.
We are also subject to the FCPA and may be subject to similar worldwide anti-bribery laws that generally prohibit companies and their intermediaries from making improper payments to government officials for the purpose of obtaining or retaining business. Despite our compliance and training programs, we cannot be certain that our procedures will be sufficient to ensure consistent compliance with all applicable international trade and anti-corruption laws, or that our employees or channel partners will strictly follow all policies and requirements to which we subject them. Any alleged or actual violations of these laws may subject us to government scrutiny, investigation, debarment, and civil and criminal penalties, which may have an adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition and reputation.
Our business may be materially affected by changes to fiscal and tax policies. Potentially negative or unexpected tax consequences of these policies, or the uncertainty surrounding their potential effects, could adversely affect our results of operations and share price.
The rules dealing with U.S. federal, state and local income taxation are constantly under review by persons involved in the legislative process and by the Internal Revenue Service (the “IRS”) and the U.S. Treasury Department. Changes to tax laws (which changes may have retroactive application) could adversely affect us or holders of our ordinary shares. In recent years, many such changes have been made, and changes are likely to continue to occur in the future. It cannot be predicted whether, when, in what form or with what effective dates tax laws, regulations and rulings may be enacted, promulgated or issued, which could result in an increase in our or our shareholders’ tax liability or require changes in the manner in which we operate in order to minimize or mitigate any adverse effects of changes in tax law.
In addition, foreign governments may enact tax laws in response to the changes in the rules dealing with U.S. federal, state and local income taxation or otherwise that could result in further changes to global taxation and materially affect our financial position and results of operations. The uncertainty surrounding the effect of the reforms on our financial results and business could also weaken confidence among investors.
Certain U.S. holders of our ordinary shares may suffer adverse U.S. tax consequences if we are characterized as a controlled foreign corporation, or a CFC, under Section 957 of the Code.
Each “Ten Percent Shareholder” (as defined below) in a non-U.S. corporation that is classified as a “controlled foreign corporation,” or a CFC, for U.S. federal income tax purposes generally is required to include in income for U.S. federal tax purposes such Ten Percent Shareholder’s pro rata share of the CFC’s “Subpart F income,” global intangible low-taxed income, and investment of earnings in U.S. property, even if the CFC has made no distributions to its shareholders. Subpart F income generally includes dividends, interest, rents and royalties, gains from the sale of securities and income from certain transactions with related parties. In addition, a Ten Percent Shareholder that realizes gain from the sale or exchange of shares in a CFC may be required to classify a portion of such gain as dividend income rather than capital gain. A non-U.S. corporation generally will be classified as a CFC for U.S. federal income tax purposes if Ten Percent Shareholders own, directly or indirectly, more than 50% of either the total combined voting power of all classes of stock of such corporation entitled to vote or of the total value of the stock of such corporation. A “Ten Percent Shareholder” is a United States person (as defined by the Code), who owns or is considered to own 10% or more of (1) the total combined voting power of all classes of stock entitled to vote or (2) the value of all classes of stock of such corporation. The determination of CFC status is complex and includes attribution rules, the application of which is not entirely certain.
During our 2024 taxable year, we believe that we had one shareholder that was a Ten Percent Shareholder for U.S. federal income tax purposes. However, our CFC status for the taxable year ending on December 31, 2024, and our current taxable year is unknown, and we may be a CFC for the taxable year ending on December 31, 2025, our current taxable year or a following year. In addition, recent changes to the attribution rules relation to the determination of CFC status may make it difficult to determine our CFC status for any taxable year or the CFC status of any of our subsidiaries. U.S. holders should consult their own tax advisors with respect to the potential adverse U.S. tax consequences of becoming a Ten Percent Shareholder in a CFC. If we are classified as both a CFC and a passive foreign investment company, or PFIC, we generally will not be treated as a PFIC with respect to those U.S. holders that meet the definition of a Ten Percent Shareholder during the period in which we are a CFC.
If there are significant disruptions in our information technology systems, our business, financial condition, and operating results could be adversely affected.
The efficient operation of our business depends on our information technology systems. We rely on our information technology systems to effectively manage sales and marketing data, accounting and financial functions, inventory management, product development tasks, research and development data, customer service and technical support functions. Our information technology systems are vulnerable to damage or interruption from earthquakes, fires, floods and other natural disasters, terrorist attacks, attacks by computer viruses or hackers, power losses, and computer system or data network failures. In addition, our data management application is hosted by a third-party service provider whose security and information technology systems are subject to similar risks, and our products’ systems contain software which could be subject to computer virus or hacker attacks or other failures.
The failure of our or our service providers’ information technology systems or our products’ software to perform as we anticipate or our failure to effectively implement new information technology systems could disrupt our entire operation or adversely affect our software products and could result in decreased sales, increased overhead costs, and product shortages, all of which could have a material adverse effect on our reputation, business, financial condition, and operating results.
If we fail to properly manage our anticipated growth, our business could suffer.
Our growth and product expansion has placed, and we expect that it will continue to place, a significant strain on our management team and on our financial resources. Failure to manage our growth effectively could cause us to misallocate management or financial resources, and result in losses or weaknesses in our infrastructure, which could materially adversely affect our business. Additionally, our anticipated growth will increase the demands placed on our suppliers, resulting in an increased need for us to manage our suppliers and monitor for quality assurance. Any failure by us to manage our growth effectively could have an adverse effect on our ability to achieve our business objectives.
We are highly dependent on the knowledge and skills of our senior management, and if we are not successful in attracting and retaining highly qualified personnel, we may not be able to successfully implement our business strategy.
Our ability to compete in the highly competitive medical devices industry depends upon our ability to attract and retain highly qualified managerial, scientific, sales and medical personnel. We are highly dependent on our senior management team and have benefited substantially from the leadership and performance of our senior management. For example, we depend on our Chief Executive Officer’s experience successfully scaling an early-stage medical device company, as well as the experience of other members of management. The loss of the services of any of our executive officers and other key employees, and our inability to find suitable replacements could result in delays in product development and harm our business. Competition for senior management in our industry is intense and we cannot guarantee that we will be able to retain our personnel. Additionally, we do not carry key man insurance on any of our current executive officers. The loss of the services of certain members of our senior management could prevent or delay the implementation and completion of our strategic objectives or divert management’s attention to seeking qualified replacements.
Shutdowns of the U.S. federal government could materially impair our business and financial condition.
Development of our product candidates and/or regulatory approval may be delayed for reasons beyond our control. For example, in 2018 and 2019 the U.S. government shut down several times and certain regulatory agencies, such as the FDA and the SEC, had to furlough critical FDA, SEC, and other government employees and stop critical activities. Currently, federal agencies in the U.S. are operating under a continuing resolution that is set to expire on March 14, 2025. Without appropriation of additional funding to federal agencies, our business operations related to our product development activities for the U.S. market could be impacted. If a prolonged government shutdown or budget sequestration occurs, it could significantly impact the ability of the FDA to timely review and process our regulatory submissions, which could have a material adverse effect on our business. Further, in our operations as a public company, future government shutdowns could impact our ability to access the public markets, such as through the declaration of effectiveness of registration statements and obtain necessary capital in order to properly capitalize and continue our operations.

---

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
None.

---

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
ITEM 2 . PROPERTIES
Our corporate headquarters are located in Yokneam, Israel, our U.S. headquarters are located in Marlborough, Massachusetts and our European headquarters are located in Berlin, Germany.
We also have an office in Fremont, California where operations ceased as of December 31, 2024.
All of our facilities are leased, and we do not own any real property. The table below sets forth details of the square footage of our current leased properties, all of which are utilized. We have no material tangible fixed assets apart from the properties described below.
Square feet
(approximate)
Fremont, California
40,320
Marlborough, Massachusetts
11,850
Yokneam, Israel
11,500
Berlin, Germany
Total
64,620
We believe our facilities are adequate and suitable for our current needs.

---

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
ITEM 3 . LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
Occasionally we are involved in various claims, lawsuits, regulatory examinations, investigations and other legal matters arising, for the most part, in the ordinary course of business. The outcome of litigation and other legal matters is inherently uncertain. In making a determination regarding accruals, using available information, we evaluate the likelihood of an unfavorable outcome in legal or regulatory proceedings to which we are a party and records a loss contingency when it is probable a liability has been incurred and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated.
Where we determine an unfavorable outcome is not probable or reasonably estimable, we do not accrue for any potential litigation loss. These subjective determinations are based on the status of such legal or regulatory proceedings, the merits of our defences and consultation with legal counsel. Actual outcomes of these legal and regulatory proceedings may materially differ from our current estimates. It is possible that resolution of one or more of the legal matters currently pending or threatened could result in losses material to our consolidated results of operations, liquidity, or financial condition.
For information regarding legal proceedings, see Note 8 “Commitments and Contingent Liabilities” in the notes to our audited consolidated financial statements included in this annual report, which discussion we incorporate by reference into this Item.

---

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURE
ITEM 4 . MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES.
Not applicable.
PART II

---

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
Market Information
Our ordinary shares began trading publicly on The Nasdaq Global Market on September 12, 2014, under the symbol “RWLK” and were transferred for listing on The Nasdaq Capital Market effective May 25, 2017. In January 2024, the symbol for our ordinary shares was changed to “LFWD”. As of March 6, 2025, we had approximately 32,492 shareholders of record.
Dividend Policy
We have never declared or paid any cash dividends on our ordinary shares. We do not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future. We currently intend to retain future earnings, if any, to finance operations and expand our business. Any future determination relating to our dividend policy will be made at the discretion of our board of directors and will depend on a number of factors, including future earnings, capital requirements, financial condition and future prospects and other factors our board of directors may deem relevant. The distribution of dividends may also be limited by Israeli law, which permits the distribution of dividends only out of retained earnings or otherwise upon the permission of an Israeli court.
Israeli Taxes Applicable to U.S. Holders
A non-Israeli resident who derives capital gains from the sale of shares in an Israeli resident company that were purchased after the company was listed for trading on a stock exchange outside of Israel will be exempt from Israeli tax so long as (amongst other things) the shares were not held through a permanent establishment that the non-resident maintains in Israel. A partial exemption may be available for non-Israeli resident shareholders who acquired their shares prior to the issuer’s initial public offering.
However, non-Israeli corporations will not be entitled to the foregoing exemption if Israeli residents (i) have a controlling interest of more than 25% in such non-Israeli corporation or (ii) are the beneficiaries of, or are entitled to, 25% or more of the revenue or profits of such non-Israeli corporation, whether directly or indirectly. Such exemption is not applicable to a person whose gains from selling or otherwise disposing of the shares are deemed to be a business income. Additionally, under the United States-Israel Tax Treaty, or the treaty, the sale, exchange or other disposition of shares by a shareholder who (i) is a U.S. resident (for purposes of the treaty), (ii) holds the shares as a capital asset, and (iii) is entitled to claim the benefits afforded to such person by the treaty, is generally exempt from Israeli capital gains tax. Such exemption will not apply if: (i) the capital gain arising from the sale, exchange or other disposition can be attributed to a permanent establishment in Israel; (ii) the shareholder holds, directly or indirectly, shares representing 10% or more of the voting capital during any part of the 12-month period preceding the disposition, subject to certain conditions; or (iii) such U.S. resident is an individual and was present in Israel for 183 days or more during the relevant taxable year. In such case, the sale, exchange, or disposition of our ordinary shares should be subject to Israeli tax, to the extent applicable; however, under the treaty, the taxpayer would be permitted to claim a credit for such taxes against the U.S. federal income tax imposed with respect to such sale, exchange, or disposition, subject to the limitations under U.S. law applicable to foreign tax credits. The treaty does not relate to U.S. state or local taxes.
In some instances where our shareholders may be liable for Israeli tax on the sale of their ordinary shares, the payment of the consideration may be subject to the withholding of Israeli tax at source. If the above exemptions from capital gains tax are not available, individuals will be subject to a 25% tax rate on real capital gains derived from the sale of shares as long as the individual is not a substantial shareholder of the corporation issuing the shares (in which case the individual will be subject to a 30% tax rate), and corporations will be subject to a 23% corporate tax rate. A substantial shareholder is generally a person who alone or together with such person’s relative or another person who collaborates with such person on a permanent basis, holds, directly or indirectly, at least 10% of any of the means of control of the corporation, including the right to vote, receive profits, nominate a director or an executive officer, receive assets upon liquidation, or order someone who holds any of the aforesaid rights how to act, regardless of the source of such right. The determination of whether the individual is a substantial shareholder will be made on the date on which the securities are sold. In addition, the individual will be deemed to be a substantial shareholder if at any time during the 12 months preceding the date of the sale he or she was a substantial shareholder.
Dividends paid on publicly traded shares, like our ordinary shares, to non-Israeli residents are generally subject to Israeli income tax at the rate of 25%, or 30% if the recipient of the dividend was a substantial shareholder at the time of distribution or at any time during the prior 12-month period. Such dividends are generally subject to Israeli withholding tax at a rate of 25% if the shares are registered with a nominee company (whether the recipient is a substantial shareholder or not), unless a different rate is provided under an applicable tax treaty, provided that a certificate from the Israeli Tax Authority allowing for a reduced withholding tax rate is obtained in advance. Under the United States-Israel Tax Treaty, the maximum rate of tax withheld at source in Israel on dividends paid to a holder of our ordinary shares who is a U.S. resident (for purposes of the treaty) is 25%. The treaty provides for reduced tax rates on dividends if (a) the shareholder is a U.S. corporation holding at least 10% of our issued voting power during the part of the tax year that precedes the date of payment of the dividend and held such minimal percentage during the whole of its prior tax year, and (b) not more than 25% of the Israeli company’s gross income consists of interest or dividends, other than dividends or interest received from subsidiary corporations or corporations 50% or more of the outstanding voting shares of which is owned by the Israeli company. The reduced treaty rate, if applicable, is 15% in the case of dividends paid from income derived from a Beneficiary or Preferred Enterprise (which is entitled to corporate tax benefits) or 12.5% otherwise. We cannot assure you that in the event we declare a dividend we will designate the income out of which the dividend is paid in a manner that will reduce shareholders’ tax liability. If the dividend is attributable partly to income derived from a Beneficiary or Preferred Enterprise and partly to other sources of income, the withholding rate will be a blended rate reflecting the relative portions of the two types of income. U.S. residents who are subject to Israeli withholding tax on a dividend may be entitled to a credit or deduction for U.S. federal income tax purposes in the amount of the taxes withheld.
Individuals who are subject to tax in Israel are also subject to an additional tax at the rate of 5% on annual income exceeding a certain threshold (NIS 721,560 for 2025, linked to the annual change in the Israeli Consumer Price Index), including, but not limited to, income derived from dividends, interest, and capital gains.
Recent Sales of Unregistered Equity Securities
None.
Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers
None.

---

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
ITEM 6. [RESERVED]

---

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements and the related notes included elsewhere in this annual report. This discussion contains forward-looking statements that are based on our management’s current expectations, estimates and projections for our business, which are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties. Our actual results may differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of many factors, including those set forth under “Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” and “Part I. Item 1A. Risk Factors.”
Overview
We are a medical device company that designs, develops, and commercializes life-changing solutions that span the continuum of care in physical rehabilitation and recovery, delivering proven functional and health benefits in clinical settings as well as in the home and community. Our initial product offerings were the ReWalk Personal and ReWalk Rehabilitation Exoskeleton devices for individuals with spinal cord injury (“SCI Products”). These devices are robotic exoskeletons that are designed for individuals with paraplegia that use our patented tilt-sensor technology and an onboard computer and motion sensors to drive motorized legs that power movement. These SCI Products allow individuals with spinal cord injury (“SCI”) the ability to stand and walk again during everyday activities at home or in the community. In March 2023, we received clearance of our premarket notification (“510(k)”) from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) for the ReWalk Personal Exoskeleton with stair and curb functionality, which adds usage on stairs and curbs to the indication for use for the device in the U.S. The clearance permits U.S. customers to participate in more walking activities in real-world environments in their daily lives where stairs or curbs may have previously limited them when using the exoskeleton for its intended, FDA-indicated uses. This feature has been available in Europe since initial CE Clearance, and real-world data from a cohort of 47 European users throughout a period of over seven years consisting of over 18,000 stair steps was collected to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of this feature and support the FDA submission. In June 2024, we submitted to the FDA a 510(k) premarket notification for ReWalk 7 Personal Exoskeleton device, a next-generation ReWalk model, and such 510(k) is pending FDA review.
We have sought to expand our product offerings beyond the SCI Products through internal development, distribution agreements, and acquisitions. We have developed our ReStore Exo-Suit device, which we began commercializing in June 2019 (we ceased sales in the EU in May 2024). The ReStore is a powered, lightweight soft exo-suit intended for use during the rehabilitation of individuals with lower limb disabilities due to stroke. In the second quarter of 2020, we finalized and moved to implement two separate agreements to distribute additional product lines in the United States, one of which we later discontinued. We are the exclusive distributor of the MYOLYN MyoCycle FES Pro cycles to U.S. rehabilitation clinics and for the MyoCycle Home cycles available to U.S. veterans through the Veterans Health Administration (“VHA”) hospitals.
In August 2023, we made our first acquisition to supplement our internal growth when we acquired AlterG, a leading provider of Anti-Gravity systems for use in physical and neurological rehabilitation. We paid a cash purchase price of approximately $19 million at closing and additional cash earnout payments may be paid based upon a percentage of AlterG’s revenue growth over the two years following the closing. The AlterG Anti-Gravity systems use patented, National Aeronautics and Space Administration (“NASA”) derived differential air pressure (“DAP”) technology to reduce the effects of gravity and allow patients to rehabilitate with finely calibrated support and reduced pain. AlterG Anti-Gravity systems are utilized in over 4,000 facilities globally in more than 40 countries. We will continue to evaluate other products for distribution or acquisition that can broaden our product offerings further to help individuals with neurological injury and disability.
In March 2025, we announced an agreement to increase our penetration of SCI Products into the workers’ compensation market in which CorLife, LLC., a Delaware limited liability company (“CorLife”) and a division of Numotion, the nation’s leading and largest provider of products and services that provide mobility, health and personal independence. Pursuant to the agreement, CorLife became the exclusive distributor for the ReWalk Personal Exoskeleton for individuals with workers’ compensation claims. The agreement leverages CorLife’s extensive network of credentialed providers and experts to include the ReWalk Personal Exoskeleton among the services and equipment they provide to thousands of injured workers each year. Under the agreement, the CorLife reimbursement team manages all workers’ compensation claims submissions for the ReWalk Personal Exoskeleton. We believe this agreement will build awareness of the benefits of the ReWalk Personal Exoskeleton among individuals with workers’ compensation coverage and gain us access to the resources of CorLife to facilitate efficient processing of claims.
We are in the research stage of ReBoot, a personal soft exo-suit for home and community use by individuals post-stroke, and we are currently evaluating the reimbursement landscape and the potential clinical impact of this device. This product would be a complementary product to ReStore as it provides active assistance to the ankle during plantar flexion and dorsiflexion for gait and mobility improvement in the home environment, and it received Breakthrough Device Designation from the FDA in November 2021. Further investment in the development path of the ReBoot was paused in 2023 pending determination regarding the clinical and commercial opportunity of this device and at this time it remains on hold.
Our principal markets are primarily in the United States and Europe with some lesser sales in Asia, the Middle East and South America. We sell our products primarily directly in the United States, through a combination of direct sales and distributors (depending on the product line) in Germany and Canada, and primarily through distributors in other markets. In markets where we sell direct to consumers, we have established relationships with clinics and rehabilitation centers, professional and college sports teams, and individuals and organizations in the SCI community, and in markets where we do not sell direct to consumers, our distributors maintain these relationships. We have primary offices in Yokneam, Israel, Marlborough, Massachusetts, and Berlin, Germany. We also had offices in Fremont, California and Queens, New York where we ceased operations as of December 31, 2024.
We have in the past generated and expect to generate in the future revenue from a combination of clinics and rehabilitation centers, commercial distributors, third-party payors (including private and government payors), professional and college sports teams, and self-pay individuals. While a broad uniform policy of coverage and reimbursement by third-party commercial payors currently does not exist in the United States for exoskeleton technologies such as the ReWalk Personal Exoskeleton, we are pursuing various paths of reimbursement and support fundraising efforts by institutions and clinics, such as the VHA policy that was issued in December 2015 for the evaluation, training, and procurement of ReWalk Personal Exoskeleton systems for all qualifying veterans living with SCI across the United States.
We have also been pursuing updates with the CMS to clarify the Medicare coverage category (i.e., benefit category) applicable for personal exoskeletons. In 2022, the National Spinal Cord Injury Statistical Center (“NSCISC”), which maintains the world’s largest database on spinal cord injury research, reported that CMS is the primary payor for approximately 57% of the SCI population which are at least five years post their injury date, with Medicare representing a majority of this percentage. In July 2020, following a successful submission and hearing process, a code was issued for ReWalk Personal Exoskeleton, which may be used for purposes of claim submission to Medicare, Medicaid, and other payors.
On November 1, 2023, CMS released the Calendar Year 2024 Home Health Prospective Payment System Final Rule, CMS-1780-F (“Final Rule”), which was adopted through the notice and comment rulemaking process. The Final Rule includes a policy confirming that personal exoskeletons are included in the Medicare brace benefit category, as of January 1, 2024. Medicare personal exoskeleton claims with dates of service on or after January 1, 2024 that are billed using HCPCS code K1007 are assigned to the brace benefit category. CMS reimburses items classified under the brace benefit category using a lump sum payment methodology.
On April 11, 2024, CMS revised its April 2024 Durable Medical Equipment, Prosthetics, Orthotics, and Supplies (“DMEPOS”) Fee Schedule to include a final lump-sum Medicare purchase fee schedule amount for personal exoskeletons (HCPCS code K1007) with an established rate of $91,032. The final payment determination was made by CMS by applying a “gap filling” process, which was used in light of CMS determining that the code describing the technology has no fee schedule pricing history and that lower extremity exoskeletons incorporate “revolutionary features” that cannot be described by or considered comparable to any other existing code or combination of codes. As part of gap-filling, CMS utilizes verifiable supplier or commercial pricing information and adjusts this pricing information according to a deflation and update factor methodology. In applying this formula to the K1007 code describing the ReWalk Personal Exoskeleton, CMS says that it calculated this final payment amount by averaging pricing information for exoskeleton devices from Lifeward and other manufacturers.
In Germany, we continue to make progress toward achieving coverage from the various government, private and worker’s compensation payors for our SCI products. In September 2017, each of German insurer BARMER GEK (“BARMER”) and national social accident insurance provider Deutsche Gesetzliche Unfallversicherung (“DGUV”) indicated that they will provide coverage to users who meet certain inclusion and exclusion criteria. In February 2018, the head office of German Statutory Health Insurance (“SHI”) Spitzenverband (“GKV”) confirmed its decision to list the ReWalk Personal Exoskeleton system in the German Medical Device Directory. This decision means that ReWalk is listed among all medical devices for compensation, which SHI providers can procure for any approved beneficiary on a case-by-case basis. During the year 2020 and 2021, we announced several new agreements with German SHIs, including TK and DAK Gesundheit, as well as the first German Private Health Insurer (“PHI”), which outline the process of obtaining our devices for eligible insured patients. In February 2025, we finalized an agreement with BARMER to formalize the reimbursement process for the provision of ReWalk exoskeletons to medically eligible beneficiaries. We are also currently working with several additional SHIs on securing a formal operating contract that will establish the process of obtaining a ReWalk Personal Exoskeleton for their beneficiaries within their system. Additionally, to date, several private insurers in the United States and Europe are providing reimbursement for ReWalk in certain cases.
Components of Our Statements of Operations
Revenue
We currently rely, and in the future will rely, on sales of our ReWalk Personal Exoskeletons, AlterG Anti-Gravity systems, MyoCycle FES cycles, and related consumables, services, and extended warranties for our revenue. Our revenue is derived from a combination of third-party payors, including private and government employers, institutions, and self-payors. Payments for our products by third party payors have been made primarily through case-by-case determinations. Third-party payors include, without limitation, private insurance plans, workers’ compensation programs, managed care organizations, and government programs including the VHA and Medicare. We expect that third-party payors will be an increasingly important source of revenue in the future as we increase the volume of sales of ReWalk Personal systems to Medicare-eligible beneficiaries following establishment of a benefit category and pricing. In December 2015, the VHA issued a national policy for the evaluation, training, and procurement of ReWalk Personal Exoskeleton systems for all qualifying veterans across the United States. The VHA policy is the first national coverage policy in the United States for qualifying individuals who have suffered spinal cord injury.
ReWalk Personal and ReWalk Rehabilitation Exoskeleton systems are generally covered by a five-year warranty from the date of purchase, which is included in the purchase price. ReWalk systems sold to Medicare beneficiaries carry a two-year warranty, consistent with the coverage decision by CMS. The warranty covers all elements of the systems (except the batteries, which carry a one-year warranty), other than repairs for normal wear and tear. The AlterG Anti-Gravity systems are sold with a one-year factory warranty covering parts and services in the U.S. and a two-year factory warranty covering parts only in the rest of the world. The ReStore device is sold with a two-year warranty.
Cost of Revenue and Gross Profit
For ReWalk and ReStore, cost of revenue consists primarily of complete systems purchased from our outsourced manufacturer, Sanmina. For these products, cost of revenue also includes internal costs such as salaries and related personnel costs including non-cash share-based compensation, functions that support manufacturing and inventory management, training and inspection, service activities, freight costs, and reserves for warranty and inventory condition. The cost of revenue also includes royalties and expenses related to royalty-bearing research and development grants.
For our AlterG systems, which we manufactured at our facility in Fremont, California until December 31,2024, cost of revenue consists primarily of raw materials, direct labor, indirect labor, and other factory overhead costs such as rent and utilities. In addition, cost of revenue also includes field service costs, shipping expenses and reserves for warranty and inventory condition.
For certain products that we distributed, such as the MyoCycle and Meditouch product lines, cost of revenue consists primarily of complete systems purchased from the manufacturers. In addition, the cost of revenue also includes field service costs and shipping expenses.
Our gross profit and gross margin (defined as gross profit as a percentage of revenue) are influenced by a number of factors, including the volume and price of our products sold, fluctuations in the mix of products sold, and variability in our cost of revenue. We expect gross profit and gross margin will expand in the future as we increase our revenue volumes and realize operating efficiencies associated with greater scale which will reduce the cost of revenue as a percentage of revenue.
Operating Expenses
Research and Development Expenses, Net
Research and development expenses, net consist primarily of salaries and related personnel costs including share-based compensation, supplies, materials, and consulting expenses associated with to product design and development, clinical studies, regulatory submissions, patent costs, sponsored research and other related activities. We expense all research and development expenses as they are incurred.
Research and development expenses are presented net of the amount of any grants we receive for research and development in the period in which we receive the grant. We previously received grants and other funding from the IIA. Certain of those grants require us to pay royalties on sales of certain systems, which are recorded as cost of revenue. We may receive additional funding from these entities or others in the future. See “Grants and Other Funding” below.
Sales and Marketing Expenses
Our sales and marketing expenses consist primarily of salaries and related personnel costs including share-based compensation for sales, sales support, marketing, and reimbursement related activities, travel, marketing, advertisement, tradeshows and conferences, lobbying, and public relations activities.
General and Administrative Expenses
Our general and administrative expenses consist primarily of salaries and related personnel costs including share-based compensation for our administrative, finance, and general management personnel, professional services, and insurance.
Financial Expenses (Income), Net
Financial income and expenses consist of bank commissions, foreign exchange gains and losses, interest earned on investments in short term deposits and royalty income.
Interest income consists of interest earned on our cash and cash equivalent balances. Interest expense consists of interest accrued on, and certain other costs with respect to any indebtedness. Foreign currency exchange changes reflect gains or losses related to transactions denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar.
Taxes on Income
As of December 31, 2024, we had not yet generated taxable income in Israel. As of that date, our net operating loss carryforwards for Israeli tax purposes amounted to approximately $256.5 million.
Since the acquisition of AlterG, Lifeward Inc. and AlterG have been filing a consolidated tax return in the U.S. Together, they have federal net operating loss (“NOL”) carryforwards totaling $48.7 million and state NOL carryforwards of $30.9 million, which are set to begin expiring in 2025 and 2028, respectively.
Our taxable income generated outside of Israel will be subject to the regular corporate tax rate in the applicable jurisdictions. As a result, our effective tax rate will be a function of the relative proportion of our taxable income that is generated in those locations compared to our overall net income.
Grants and Other Funding
Israel Innovation Authority (formerly known as the Office of the Chief Scientist)
From our inception through December 31, 2024, we have received a total of $2.8 million in funding from the IIA, $1.6 million of which are royalty-bearing grants, $400 thousand were received in consideration for an investment in our preferred shares while $806 thousand was received without future obligation. Of the royalty-bearing grants received, we have paid royalties to the IIA in the total amount of $114 thousand. The agreements with IIA require us to pay royalties at a rate of 3% on sales of certain systems and related services up to the total amount of funding received for the development of these systems, linked to the dollar, and bearing interest at an annual rate of SOFRPR applicable to dollar deposits. If we transfer IIA-supported technology or know-how outside of Israel, we will be liable for additional payments to IIA depending upon the value of the transferred technology or know-how, the amount of IIA support, the time of completion of the IIA-supported research project and other factors. As of December 31, 2024, the aggregate contingent liability to the IIA was $1.6 million. For more information, see “Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors-We have received Israeli government grants for certain of our research and development activities and we may receive additional grants in the future. The terms of those grants restrict our ability to manufacture products or transfer technologies outside of Israel and we may be required to pay penalties in such cases or upon the sale of our company.”
Results of Operations
Year Ended December 31, 2024 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2023
Revenue
Our revenue for 2024 and 2023 were as follows (dollars in thousands, except unit amounts):
Years Ended December 31,
Revenue
$
25,663
$
13,854
Revenue consist of transactions for our portfolio of ReWalk, AlterG, ReStore and MyoCycle systems.
Revenue was $25.7 million, an increase of $11.8 million, or 85%, during 2024 as compared to 2023. Of this increase, $7.9 million was attributable to the full year impact of the AlterG business. The remaining increase of $3.9 million was primarily from higher revenue from ReWalk Personal Exoskeletons in the U.S. due to Medicare coverage.
In the future, we expect our growth to be primarily driven by sales of our ReWalk Personal device through expansion of coverage and reimbursement by commercial and government third-party payors, more shipments of our AlterG Anti-Gravity system through greater penetration of rehabilitation clinics in the U.S. and internationally, and more placements of the MyoCycle device with rehabilitation clinics and personal users.
Gross Profit
Our gross profit for 2024 and 2023 were as follows (in thousands):
Years Ended December 31,
Gross profit
$
8,216
$
4,453
Gross profit was $8.2 million, or 32% of revenue, for 2024, as compared to a gross profit of $4.5 million, or 32% of revenue for 2023. This increase was a result of higher sales volume from ReWalk Personal Exoskeletons due to CMS coverage in the U.S., along with a full year of revenue from AlterG, both contributing to the overall growth in gross profit.
We expect gross profit and gross margin will increase in the future as we increase our revenue volumes and realize operating efficiencies associated with greater scale which will reduce the cost of revenue as a percentage of revenue. Gross margin is also expected to increase in the future as a result of the transition of the production of the AlterG systems from our factory in Fremont, California, where we discontinued operations as of December 31, 2024, to a contract manufacturer.
Research and Development Expense, Net
Our research and development expense, net for 2024 and 2023 was as follows (in thousands):
Years Ended December 31,
Research and development expense, net
$
4,625
$
4,148
Research and development expense was $4.6 million in 2024, an increase of $0.5 million, or 11.5%, during 2024 as compared to 2023. The increase is attributable to the full year impact of the AlterG business and included investments in new product development projects.
We intend to focus the rest of our research and development expenses mainly on our current product support, as well as to advance the FDA review of the submission for clearance of the ReWalk 7 next-generation exoskeleton model. We also have ongoing product development activity to reduce the material costs for our ReWalk and AlterG product lines.
Sales and Marketing Expense
Our sales and marketing expense for 2024 and 2023 was as follows (in thousands):
Years Ended December 31,
Sales and marketing expense
$
17,949
$
13,922
Sales and marketing expense was $17.9 million in 2024, an increase of $4.0 million, or 28.9%, during 2024 as compared to 2023. The increase was primarily due to higher personnel-related expenses from increased headcount following the AlterG acquisition and additional spending on promotional activities.
In the near term our sales and marketing expense are expected to be driven by our efforts to facilitate growth in the sales of our commercial product lines, expand the reimbursement coverage of our ReWalk Personal Exoskeleton device, and support the training activities of ReWalk customers.
General and Administrative Expense
Our general and administrative expense for 2024 and 2023 was as follows (in thousands):
Years Ended December 31,
General and administrative
$
5,195
$
9,995
General and administrative expense was $5.2 million, a decrease of $4.8 million, or 48.0%, during 2024 as compared to 2023. The decrease was mainly driven by remeasurement of earn out liability of $2.6 million and decrease in M&A related expenses to the AlterG acquisition in 2023.
Impairment charges
Years Ended December 31,
Impairment charges
$
9,794
$
-
During the year ended December 31, 2024, we recorded an impairment charge of $9.8 million primarily related to certain acquired intangible assets, due to lower-than-expected financial performance
Financial income, net
Our financial income, net for 2024 and 2023 was as follows (in thousands):
Years Ended December 31,
Financial income, net
$
$
1,467
Financial income, net, reflects a decrease in financial income of $1.0 million during 2024 as compared to 2023. The decrease in financial income was primarily due to lower yielding interest earning accounts, a decline in interest income, and unfavourable exchange rate fluctuations.
Income Tax
Our income tax for 2024 and 2023 was as follows (in thousands):
Years Ended December 31,
Taxes on income (benefit)
$
$
(12
)
Income tax increased by $55 thousand during 2024 as compared to 2023, mainly due to our subsidiary’s activity in Germany.
Year Ended December 31, 2023 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2022
A discussion of changes in our results of operations in 2023 compared to 2022 has been omitted from this annual report on Form 10-K but may be found in “Part I. Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” of our Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023, filed with the SEC on February 27, 2024, as amended on April 29, 2024, which is available free of charge on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov and at golifeward.com, and is incorporated by reference herein.
Critical Accounting Policies
Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles. The preparation of our financial statements requires us to make estimates, judgments and assumptions that can affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. We base our estimates, judgments and assumptions on historical experience and other factors that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. Materially different results can occur as circumstances change and additional information becomes known. Besides the estimates identified above that are considered critical, we make many other accounting estimates in preparing our financial statements and related disclosures. See Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements presented elsewhere in this annual report for a description of the significant accounting policies that we used to prepare our consolidated financial statements. The critical accounting policies that were impacted by the estimates, judgments and assumptions used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements are discussed below.
Revenue Recognition
Our revenue is recognized in accordance with ASC Topic 606 when obligations under the terms of a contract with our customer are satisfied; generally, this occurs with the transfer of control of our products or services. Revenue is measured as the amount of consideration to which we expect to be entitled in exchange for transferring products or providing services. To achieve this core principle, we apply the following five steps:
1. identify the contract with a customer;
2. identify the performance obligations in the contract;
3. determine the transaction price;
4. allocate the transaction price to performance obligations in the contract; and
5. recognize revenue when or as we satisfy a performance obligation.
Provisions are made at the time of revenue recognition for any applicable warranty cost expected to be incurred. The timing for revenue recognition among the various products and customers is dependent upon satisfaction of such criteria and generally varies from either shipment or delivery to the customer depending on the specific shipping terms of a given transaction, as stipulated in the agreement with each customer. Other than pricing terms which may differ due to the different volumes of purchases between distributors and end-users, there are no material differences in the terms and arrangements involving direct and indirect customers. Our products sold through agreements with distributors are non-exchangeable, non-refundable, non-returnable and without any rights of price protection or stock rotation. Accordingly, we consider all the distributors as end-users. We generally do not grant a right of return for our products except in rare circumstances, and in those cases we record reductions to revenue for expected future product returns based on our historical experience and estimates.
For the majority of sales of ReWalk Rehabilitation Exoskeleton systems, we include insignificant training and consider the elements in the arrangement to be a single performance obligation. Therefore, the Company recognizes revenue for the system only when control is transferred after delivery and when the training has been completed, in accordance with the agreement terms with the customer, once all other revenue recognition criteria have been met. For sales of ReWalk Personal Exoskeleton systems to end users, and for sales of ReWalk Personal Exoskeleton or ReWalk Rehabilitation Exoskeleton systems to third party distributors, we do not provide training to the end user as this training is completed by the rehabilitation centers or by the distributor that have previously completed the ReWalk Training program.
Warranties are classified as either assurance type or service type warranty. A warranty is considered an assurance type warranty if it provides the consumer with assurance that the product will function as intended for a limited period of time.
SCI Products typically include a five-year warranty except for certain payors in which it is a two-year warranty. For the five-year warranty, the first two years are considered as an assurance type warranty and the additional three-year period is considered an extended service arrangement, which is a service type warranty. A service type warranty is either sold with a unit or separately for a unit for which the warranty has expired. A service type warranty is accounted as a separate performance obligation and revenue is recognized ratably over the life of the warranty.
With the recent establishment of a Medicare reimbursement pathway for the ReWalk product, the Company includes variable consideration when, in the Company’s judgment, it is probable that a significant future reversal of cumulative revenue under the contract will not occur. The Company reassesses variable consideration at each reporting period and, if necessary, these estimates are adjusted to reflect the anticipated amounts to be collected when those facts and circumstances become known.
The ReStore device is sold with a two-year warranty which is considered as assurance type warranty.
The AlterG Anti-Gravity systems are sold with a one-year assurance type warranty for parts and labor in the US and with a two-year assurance type warranty for parts for distributors. We also sell extended warranties for AlterG Anti-Gravity systems for the periods after the expiration of the original warranty. These are accounted for as separate performance obligations from the AlterG Anti-Gravity system.
We rent our AlterG Anti-Gravity systems to customers for a fixed monthly fee over the rental term, which typically ranges from 2 to 3 years. Rental revenues accounted for under ASC Topic 842 and are recorded as earned on a monthly basis. We also offer for the SCI Products a rent-to-purchase model in which we recognize revenue ratably according to the agreed rental monthly fee for a limited period prior to selling its products. For units placed, we transfer control and recognize a sale when title has passed to our customer and rental revenue ratably according to the agreed rental monthly fee. Each unit placed is considered an independent, unbundled performance obligation.
Income Taxes
As part of the process of preparing our consolidated financial statements, we are required to estimate our taxes in each of the jurisdictions in which we operate. We account for income taxes in accordance with ASC Topic 740, “Income Taxes,” or ASC Topic 740. ASC Topic 740 prescribes the use of an asset and liability method whereby deferred tax asset and liability account balances are determined based on the difference between book value and the tax bases of assets and liabilities and carryforward tax losses. Deferred taxes are measured using the enacted tax rates and laws that are expected to be in effect when the differences are expected to reverse. We exercise judgment and provide a valuation allowance, if necessary, to reduce deferred tax assets to their estimated realizable value if it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax asset will not be realized. We have established a full valuation allowance with respect to our deferred tax assets.
ASC 740, “Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes” provides presentation requirements to classify deferred tax assets and liabilities, along with any related valuation allowance, are classified as non-current on the balance sheet. We account for uncertain tax positions in accordance with ASC 740 and recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such a position should be measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than 50% likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement. Accordingly, we report a liability for unrecognized tax benefits resulting from uncertain tax positions taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. We recognize interest and penalties, if any, related to unrecognized tax benefits in tax expense.
Recently Issued and Adopted Accounting Pronouncements
A discussion of recent accounting pronouncements is included in Note 2y, New Accounting Pronouncements, to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this annual report.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Sources of Liquidity and Outlook
Since inception, we have funded our operations primarily through the sale of our equity securities and convertible notes to investors in private placements, the sale of our equity securities in public offerings, cash exercises of outstanding warrants and the incurrence of bank debt.
As of December 31, 2024, the Company had cash and cash equivalents of $6.7 million. The Company has an accumulated deficit in the total amount of $264.8 million as of December 31, 2024 and further losses are anticipated in the development of its business. Those factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon the Company obtaining the necessary financing to meet its obligations and repay its liabilities arising from normal business operations when they come due.
The Company intends to finance operating costs over the next twelve months with existing cash on hand, potential reduction in operating cash burn and future issuances of equity and debt securities, or through a combination of the foregoing. However, we will also need to seek additional sources of financing if we require more funds than anticipated during the next 12 months or in later periods.
The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming the Company will continue as a going concern, which contemplates the realization of assets and liabilities and commitments in the normal course of business. The consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2024 do not include any adjustments to reflect the possible future effects on the recoverability and classification of assets or the amounts and classification of liabilities that may result from uncertainty related to the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.
We expect to incur future net losses and our transition to profitability is dependent upon, among other things, the successful development and commercialization of our products and product candidates, the establishment of contracts for the distribution of new product lines, or the acquisition of additional product lines, any of which, or in combination, would contribute to the achievement of a level of revenue adequate to support our cost structure. Until we achieve profitability or generate positive cash flows, we will continue to need to raise additional cash from time to time.
We intend to fund future operations through cash on hand, additional private and/or public offerings of debt or equity securities, cash exercises of outstanding warrants or a combination of the foregoing. In addition, we may seek additional capital through arrangements with strategic partners or from other sources and we will continue to address our cost structure. Notwithstanding, there can be no assurance that we will be able to raise additional funds or achieve or sustain profitability or positive cash flows from operations.
Our anticipated primary uses of cash are funding (i) sales, marketing, and promotion activities related to market development for our ReWalk Personal Exoskeleton device and AlterG Anti-Gravity system, broadening third-party payor and CMS coverage for our ReWalk Personal Exoskeleton device and commercializing our new product lines added through distribution agreements; (ii) development of future generation designs for our ReWalk device, new AlterG products utilizing DAP technology, and our lightweight exo-suit technology for potential home personal health utilization for multiple indications; (iii) routine product updates; (iv) potential acquisitions of businesses, such as our recent acquisition of AlterG, and (v) general corporate purposes, including working capital needs. Our future cash requirements will depend on many factors, including our rate of revenue growth, the expansion of our sales and marketing activities, the timing and extent of our spending on research and development efforts, the attractiveness of potential acquisition candidates and international expansion. If our current estimates of revenue, expenses or capital or liquidity requirements change or are inaccurate, we may seek to sell additional equity or debt securities, arrange for additional bank debt financing, or refinance our indebtedness. There can be no assurance that we will be able to raise such funds on acceptable terms. For more information, see “Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors-We have concluded that there is substantial doubt as to our ability to continue as a going concern.”
Equity Raises
Use of Form S-3
Beginning with the filing of our Form 10-K on February 17, 2017, we were subject to limitations under the applicable rules of Form S-3, which constrained our ability to secure capital with respect to public offerings pursuant to our effective Form S-3. These rules limit the size of primary securities offerings conducted by issuers with a public float of less than $75 million to no more than one-third of their public float in any 12-month period. At the time of filing this annual report, we were subject to these limitations because our public float did not reach at least $75 million in the 60 days preceding the filing of this annual report. We will continue to be subject to these limitations for the remainder of the 2025 fiscal year and until the earlier of such time as our public float reaches at least $75 million or when we file our next annual report for the year ended December 31, 2025, at which time we will be required to re-test our status under these rules. If our public float is below $75 million as of the filing of our next annual report on Form 10-K, or at the time we file a new Form S-3, we will continue to be subject to these limitations, until the date that our public float again reaches $75 million. These limitations do not apply to secondary offerings for the resale of our ordinary shares or other securities by selling shareholders or to the issuance of ordinary shares upon conversion by holders of convertible securities, such as warrants. We have registered up to $100 million of ordinary shares warrants and/or debt securities and certain other outstanding securities with registration rights on our registration statement on Form S-3, which was declared effective by the SEC in May 2022.
Equity Offerings and Warrant Exercises
On January 7, 2025, we entered into a purchase agreement with certain institutional investors for the issuance and sale of 1,818,183 ordinary shares and ordinary warrants to purchase up to an aggregate of 1,818,183 ordinary shares at an exercise price of $2.75 per share. Each ordinary share was sold at an offering price of $2.75. The offering of the ordinary shares and the ordinary shares that are issuable from time to time upon exercise of the pre-funded warrants was made pursuant to our shelf registration statement on Form S-3 initially filed with the SEC on March 30, 2022, and declared effective by the SEC on May 16, 2022, and the ordinary warrants were issued in a concurrent private placement. The ordinary warrants are exercisable at any time and from time to time, in whole or in part, following the date of issuance and ending three years from the date of issuance. The offering closed on January 8, 2025. Additionally, we issued warrants to purchase up to 109,091 ordinary shares, with an exercise price of $3.4375 per share, exercisable at any time and from time to time, in whole or in part, following the date of issuance and ending three years from the date of issuance, to certain representatives of H.C. Wainwright as compensation for its role as the placement agent in January 2025 private placement offering.
Share Repurchase Program
On June 2, 2022, our board of directors approved a share repurchase program to repurchase up to $8.0 million of our ordinary shares. On July 21, 2022, we received approval from an Israeli court for the share repurchase program. The program was scheduled to expire on the earlier of January 20, 2023, or reaching $8.0 million of repurchases. On December 22, 2022, our board of directors approved an extension of the repurchase program, with such extension to be in the aggregate amount of up to $5.8 million. The extension was approved by an Israeli court on February 9, 2023, and it expired on August 9, 2023.
As of December 31, 2024, pursuant to the share repurchase program, we had repurchased a total of 574,658 of our outstanding ordinary shares at a total cost of $3.5 million.
Cash Flows
Years Ended December 31,
Net cash used in operating activities
$
(21,718
)
$
(20,667
)
$
(17,891
)
Net cash used in investing activities
-
(18,149
)
(25
)
Net cash used in financing activities
-
(992
)
(2,500
)
Effect of Exchange rate changes on Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash
(79
)
Net cash flow
$
(21,684
)
$
(39,763
)
$
(20,495
)
Year Ended December 31, 2024 to Year Ended December 31, 2023
Net Cash Used in Operating Activities
Net cash used in operating activities was $21.7 million in 2024, an increase of $1.1 million as compared to 2023 mainly due to higher investment in working capital items, including trade receivables and inventory reflecting the timing of collections, payments and inventory management, partially offset by higher revenues in relation to cash expenses.
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities
Net cash used in investing activities decreased by $18.1 million in 2024 as compared to 2023, primarily due to the acquisition of AlterG.
Net Cash Used in Financing Activities
Net cash used in financing activities decreased by $0.9 million in 2024 as compared to 2023, mainly due to the repurchase of our ordinary shares under our share repurchase program, which expired on August 9, 2023.
Year Ended December 31, 2023 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2022
A discussion of changes in our cash flows in 2023 compared to 2022 has been omitted from this annual report on Form 10-K but may be found in “Part I. Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” of our Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023, filed with the SEC on February 27, 2024, as amended on April 29, 2024, which is available free of charge on the SECs website at www.sec.gov and at golifeward.com, and is incorporated by reference herein.
Obligations and Commercial Commitments
Set forth below is a summary of our contractual obligations as of December 31, 2024:
Payments due by period (in dollars, in thousands)
Contractual obligations
Total
Less than
1 year
1-3 years
Purchase obligations (1)
$
7,257
$
7,257
$
-
Collaboration Agreement and License Agreement obligations (2)
-
Operating lease obligations (3)
Earnout liability (4)
-
Total
$
8,819
$
8,794
$
(1) We depend on one contract manufacturer, Sanmina Corporation, for both the SCI products and the ReStore Products, and one contract manufacturer, Cirtronics Corporation, for the AlterG Anti-Gravity systems. We place our manufacturing orders with each of Sanmina and Cirtronics pursuant to purchase orders or by providing forecasts for future requirements. Purchase orders are executed with suppliers based on our sales forecast.
(2) Under the Collaboration Agreement, we were required to pay in quarterly installments the funding of our joint research collaboration with Harvard, subject to a minimum funding commitment under applicable circumstances. Our License Agreement with Harvard consists of patent reimbursement expenses payments and a license upfront fee payment. There are also several milestone payments contingent upon the achievement of certain product development and commercialization milestones and royalty payments on net sales from certain patents licensed to Harvard. All product development milestones contemplated by the License Agreement have been met as of December 31, 2024; however, there are still outstanding commercialization milestones under the License Agreement that depend on us reaching certain sales amounts, some or all of which may not occur. Our Collaboration Agreement with Harvard was concluded on March 31, 2022.
(3) Our operating leases consist of leases for our facilities in the United States, Israel and Germany and motor vehicles in Israel.
(4) Earnout payments based on AlterG’s revenue growth during the two consecutive trailing twelve-month periods following closing of the acquisition.
We calculated the payments due under our operating lease obligation for our Israeli office that are to be paid in NIS at a rate of exchange of NIS 3.647:$1.00, which was the applicable exchange rate as of December 31, 2024.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We had no off-balance sheet arrangements or guarantees of third-party obligations during the periods presented.
Trend Information
For information on significant known trends, please see “Part I-Item 1. Business - Overview” in this annual report.

---

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Currency Exchange Risk
Our results of operations and cash flows are affected by fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. Since 2015, most of our expenses were denominated in U.S. dollars and the remaining expenses were denominated in NIS and euro, until 2018 most of our revenue was denominated in U.S. dollars and the remainder of our revenue was denominated in euro and British pound whereas in the last four years our euro revenue is higher than our U.S dollar revenue. Accordingly, changes in the value of the NIS and Euro relative to the U.S. dollar in each of the years 2024, 2023, and 2022 impacted amounts recorded on our consolidated statements of operations for these periods. We expect that the denominations of our revenue and expenses in 2025 will be consistent with what we experienced in 2024.
The following table presents information about the devaluation in the exchange rates of the NIS and euro against the U.S. dollar in 2024, 2023 and 2022:
Change in Average Exchange Rate
Period
NIS against the
U.S. Dollar (%)
Euro against the
U.S. Dollar (%)
(0.25
)
0.06
(9.00
)
2.67
3.70
10.84
The figures above represent the change in the average exchange rate in the given period compared to the average exchange rate in the immediately preceding period. Negative figures represent the appreciation of the U.S. dollar compared to the NIS or the euro. A 10% increase or decrease in the value of the NIS against the U.S. dollar would have decreased or increased our net loss by approximately $498 thousand in 2024. A 10% increase or decrease in the value of the euro against the U.S. dollar would have decreased or increased our net loss by approximately $73 thousand in 2024.
Other Market Risks
We do not believe that we have material exposure to interest rate risks or to inflationary risks.

---

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
ITEM 8 . FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
The information required hereunder is set forth under Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, Consolidated Balance Sheets, Consolidated Statements of Operations, Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity, Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows and Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in the Consolidated Financial Statements that are a part of this annual report. Other financial information is included in the Consolidated Financial Statements that are a part of this annual report.

---

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.

---

ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required financial disclosure.
As of the end of the period covered by this annual report, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and Rule 15d-15(e) of the Exchange Act). Based upon, and as of the date of, this evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective such that the information required to be disclosed by us in our SEC reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms, and is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act. Our internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. GAAP.
Our internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that:
● pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of our assets;
● provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP, and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of our management and directors; and
● provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on our financial statements.
Management has assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2024. In making its assessment, management used the criteria described in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
Based on management’s assessment, management has concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2024 to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of consolidated financial statements for external reporting purposes in accordance with U.S. GAAP.
This annual report does not include an attestation report of our independent registered public accounting firm regarding internal controls over financial reporting because we are exempt from this requirement as a smaller reporting company and non-accelerated filer.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
During the fourth quarter of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024, there were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) of the Exchange Act) that materially affected, or that are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

---

ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 9B . OTHER INFORMATION
Rule 10b5-1 Trading Arrangements
During the quarter ended December 31, 2024, none of our directors or officers (as defined in Rule 16a-1(f) under the Exchange Act) adopted or terminated a “Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement” or “non-Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement” (as each term is defined in Item 408(a) of Regulation S-K).

---

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Information About Our Directors
The following table sets forth the names and ages of the directors of the Company as of March 6, 2025 and their principal occupations at present and for the past five years. Our Board of Directors (the “Board”) currently consists of seven members and is divided into three classes. One class is elected each year at the annual meeting of stockholders for a term of three years. The term of the Class II directors expires at the 2025 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. No family relationships exist between any directors or executive officers, as such term is defined in Item 401 of Regulation S-K promulgated under the Exchange Act.
Name
Age
Current Position with the Company
Director Since
Joseph Turk* (2)
Class I Director, Chairman
Hadar Levy* (3)
Class I Director
Larry Jasinski
Class II Director, Chief Executive Officer
Dr. John William Poduska* (2)(3)
Class II Director
Randel E. Richner* (1)(2)
Class II Director
Michael Swinford*(1)
Class III Director
Robert Marshall*(3)
Class III Director
* Independent
(1) Member of Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee.
(2) Member of Compensation Committee.
(3) Member of Audit Committee.
Class II Directors Continuing in Office Until the 2025 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders
Set forth below is a list of our directors continuing in office until the 2025 annual general meeting of shareholders, together with certain biographical information, including their ages as of the date of this annual report:
Larry Jasinski, 67, has served as our Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and as a member of our Board since February 2012. From 2005 until 2012, Mr. Jasinski served as the President and Chief Executive Officer of Soteira, Inc., a company engaged in development and commercialization of products used to treat individuals with vertebral compression fractures, which was acquired by Globus Medical in 2012. From 2001 to 2005, Mr. Jasinski was President and Chief Executive Officer of Cortek, Inc., a company that developed next-generation treatments for degenerative disc disease, which was acquired by Alphatec in 2005. From 1985 until 2001, Mr. Jasinski served in multiple sales, research and development, and general management roles at Boston Scientific Corporation. Mr. Jasinski has served on the board of directors of Massachusetts Bay Lines since 2015 and of LeMaitre Vascular, Inc. since 2003. Mr. Jasinski holds a B.Sc. in marketing from Providence College and an MBA from the University of Bridgeport. We believe that Mr. Jasinski’s successful leadership and executive experience, along with his extensive knowledge of the medical devices industry and research and development, provide him the qualifications and skills to act as a member of our Board.
Dr. John William Poduska, 87, has served on our Board since 2014. He also serves as a director on the boards of a number of privately-held companies. Dr. Poduska also served as a director of EXA Corporation (Nasdaq: EXA), where he served as chairman of the company and a member of the nominating and corporate governance committee, until 2018, Novell, Inc. until 2011 and of Anadarko Petroleum Corporation and Safeguard Scientifics, Inc. until 2009. Dr. Poduska was the Chairman of Advanced Visual Systems Inc., a provider of visualization software, from January 1992 to December 2001. From December 1989 until December 1991, Dr. Poduska was President and Chief Executive Officer of Stardent Computer Inc., a computer manufacturer. From December 1985 until December 1989, Dr. Poduska served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Stellar Computer Inc., a computer manufacturer he founded which is the predecessor of Stardent Computer Inc. Prior to founding Stellar Computer, Inc., Dr. Poduska founded Apollo Computer Inc. and Prime Computer, Inc. Dr. Poduska holds a Sc.D. from MIT and an Honorary Doctorate of Humane Letters from Lowell University. We believe that Dr. Poduska’s varied director experience, both in private and public companies, his expertise in computer engineering and his familiarity with developing companies equip him with the qualifications and skills to serve as a member of our Board.
Randel E. Richner, 69, has served on our Board since November 2020. Ms. Richner has over 30 years’ experience in health policy, reimbursement and economics. From 2013 to 2015, Ms. Richner served as Executive Vice President of Intralign Health, LLC. From 2006 to 2012, she was President and Founder of Neocure Group, data analytics, health economics and reimbursement strategic services, acquired by Intralign Health, LLC in 2013. From 1997 to 2006, Ms. Richner was Vice President of Global Government Affairs and Reimbursement, Boston Scientific Corporation. Ms. Richner has engaged with U.S. Congress and CMS, appointed as first industry representative, Executive Committee (EC) Medicare Coverage Advisory Committee (MCAC). She has served on the Executive Dean’s Advisory Board, University of Michigan’s School of Public Health, since 2007, and has served on multiple boards including MassMedic (founding Women in MedTech), Executive Advisory Board Center for Evaluation Value, Risk Tufts New England Medical Center, International Society of Pharmacoeconomics and Research (ISPOR), founding the U.S. Medical Device Council. Ms. Richner has been an invited executive lecturer at Dartmouth, Tuck School of Business; University of Michigan School of Engineering and University of Michigan School of Public Health. She has a Master of Public Health in Health Policy and Administration and a Bachelor of Science in Nursing from University of Michigan. We believe that Ms. Richner’s extensive leadership and board membership experience in the healthcare industry, as well as her familiarity with health economics and reimbursement procedures, provides her with a unique perspective of our market and the qualifications and skills to serve as a member of our Board.
Class III Director Continuing in Office until the 2026 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders
Set forth below is our director continuing in office until the 2026 annual general meeting of shareholders, together with certain biographical information, including his age as of the date of this annual report:
Michael Swinford, 56, has served on our Board since April 2024. Mr. Swinford has been Chief Executive Officer of Numotion since July 2014, where he has grown the company to become the largest provider of mobility and independence solutions in the United States - serving over 400,000 individuals annually with Spinal Cord Injuries, Traumatic Brain Injuries, ALS, Muscular Dystrophy, Cerebral Palsy, Multiple Sclerosis, Spinal Muscular Atrophy, Amputees and many other mobility related disabilities. As CEO at Numotion, Mr. Swinford has expanded commercial coverage with over 5000 health plans, rehab hospitals, specialty and multi-disciplinary clinics, skilled nursing facilities, primary care, and home health providers. Mr. Swinford has led efforts for benefit coverage determination for Power Wheelchair Seat Elevation systems in 2023 and is actively leading efforts for Power Standing Wheelchairs and reform of Service and Repair regulations and reimbursement levels. Prior to Numotion, Mr. Swinford had a highly successful 22-year career at GE Healthcare, including serving as the President and CEO of GE Healthcare Services and as an officer of General Electric Company. Mr. Swinford held various operational and commercial roles throughout his career leading through various business cycles from start-ups to turnarounds. Mr. Swinford also serves as a director of CareATC, a technology enabled population health primary care provider, as well as a director of Aspen Surgical, a global surgical supply manufacturer. We believe that Mr. Swinford’s extensive experience with health and rehabilitation products, as well as his knowledge of the reimbursement process, provide him the qualifications and skills to serve as a member of our Board.
Robert Marshall, 58, has served on our Board since November 2024. Mr. Marshall has served as the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of Lantheus Holdings, Inc. (“Lantheus”), a public radiopharmaceutical company, since September 2018. Prior to joining Lantheus, Mr. Marshall spent 16 years with Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. (“Zimmer Biomet”), a public global medical device company with a leading position in musculoskeletal health, in which he held various senior leadership roles, including Vice President, Investor Relations and Corporate Treasurer, and most recently Vice President, Americas Finance, for the U.S., Canadian and Latin American commercial markets. Before Zimmer Biomet, Mr. Marshall was employed with Brown & Williamson Tobacco, a subsidiary of British American Tobacco, p.l.c., in Louisville, Kentucky, where he held several positions of increasing responsibility. Mr. Marshall holds a Master of Business Administration from Indiana University, South Bend, and a Bachelor of Business Administration in Finance from the University of Notre Dame. He also holds the CFA designation. We believe that Mr. Marshall’s extensive financial leadership experience provide him the qualifications and skills to serve as a member of our Board.
Class I Directors Continuing in Office Until the 2027 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders
Set forth below is a list of our directors continuing in office until the 2024 annual general meeting of shareholders, together with certain biographical information, including their ages as of the date of this annual report:
Joseph Turk, 57, has served on our Board since April 2022 and has served as our Chairman since September 2024. Mr. Turk has served as an Executive Vice President of Fresenius Medical Care North America since 2019, during which he has served as the Global Head of Home Therapies since January 2022, President of its North American Renal Therapies Group from July 2021 through December 2021, and as the President of its U.S. Home and Critical Care Therapies group from February 2019 until July 2021. Previously he served in a number of roles at NxStage Medical, Inc. from 2000 to 2019, including President, Senior Vice President, and Vice President of Marketing. Prior to this, Mr. Turk held roles at Boston Scientific Corporation and McKinsey and Company. Mr. Turk holds a B.A. from Wabash College and an M.A from the Kellogg Graduate School of Management. We believe that Mr. Turk’s management leadership and experience in successfully achieving favorable Medicare reimbursement, building an organization for implementation of commercialization with a novel breakthrough medical device, and completing multiple new business development transactions provide him the qualifications and skills to serve as a member of our Board.
Hadar Levy, 52, has served on our Board since August 2022. Mr. Levy has more than 20 years of experience in management and finance. Mr. Levy has served as the Chief Executive Officer of Brainsway Ltd., a commercial stage medical device company developing advanced noninvasive neurostimulation treatments for mental health disorders, since February 2023, and prior to that, held several senior management roles at Brainsway since joining in July 2014, including as Senior Vice President and Chief Operating Officer since May 2020, and as Chief Financial Officer from September 2014 to May 2020. Prior to joining Brainsway, Mr. Levy served as a finance manager in the Latin America Division at Amdocs Ltd., where he was responsible for accounting, financial reporting, treasury, portfolio management and finance support for Mergers & Acquisitions. Prior to Amdocs, he served as Chief Financial Officer & Business Development of Notal Vision, a healthcare company that researches and develops medical technologies for detecting retinal malfunction and deterioration, where he was responsible for all financial functions and led financial rounds of equity including M&A activities with strategic partners. Prior to this position, he served as Controller of GE Healthcare Israel. Mr. Levy began his career at Deloitte LLP. He holds a BA in Accounting and Economics, an LLM degree from Bar-Ilan University (Tel Aviv, Israel), and is a Certified Public Accountant. We believe that Mr. Levy’s finance and senior management experience in the medical device industry experience provide him with the qualifications and skills to serve as a member of our Board.
Information About Our Executive Officers
The following table sets forth the name, age and position of each of our executive officers as of March 6, 2025:
Name
Age
Position
Larry Jasinski
Chief Executive Officer and Director
Michael Lawless
Chief Financial Officer
Charles Remsberg
Chief Sales Officer
Jeannine Lynch
Vice President of Market Access
Almog Adar
Vice President of Finance and Chief Accounting Officer
Larry Jasinski has served as our Chief Executive Officer and as a member of our board since February 2012. From 2005 until 2012, Mr. Jasinski served as the President and Chief Executive Officer of Soteira, Inc., a company engaged in development and commercialization of products used to treat individuals with vertebral compression fractures, which was acquired by Globus Medical in 2012. From 2001 to 2005, Mr. Jasinski was President and Chief Executive Officer of Cortek, Inc., a company that developed next-generation treatments for degenerative disc disease, which was acquired by Alphatec in 2005. From 1985 until 2001, Mr. Jasinski served in multiple sales, research and development, and general management roles at Boston Scientific Corporation. Mr. Jasinski has served on the board of directors of Massachusetts Bay Lines since 2015 and of LeMaitre Vascular, Inc. since 2003. Mr. Jasinski holds a B.Sc. in marketing from Providence College and an MBA from the University of Bridgeport.
Michael Lawless has served as our Chief Financial Officer since September 2022. Prior to Lifeward, Mr. Lawless served as a CFO consultant for Danforth Advisors, LLC, a provider of financial consulting services to the life sciences industry. From 2015 to 2020, Mr. Lawless held several financial leadership positions including Division CFO at Azenta, Inc. (formerly Brooks Automation, Inc.), a worldwide provider of management solutions for biological samples. Previously, Mr. Lawless also held financial leadership roles for AECOM Technology, Inc., PerkinElmer, Inc., Momenta Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and CTI Molecular Imaging, Inc. Mr. Lawless has a Bachelor of Arts degree in Economics from Swarthmore College, a Master of Business Administration degree from the Tuck School of Business at Dartmouth College and is a Certified Public Accountant.
Charles Remsberg has served as our Chief Sales Officer since August 2023. Prior to Lifeward, Mr. Remsberg served as CEO of AlterG from March 2017 until our acquisition of AlterG in August 2023. An industry veteran of over 30 years, Mr. Remsberg has been responsible for bringing innovative rehabilitation technology to physical therapy, neuro-rehabilitation, sports medicine, and wellness customers. Prior to serving at AlterG, Mr. Remsberg served in both executive and commercial leadership roles for Tibion (for which he served as the CEO from December 2009 to April 2013, when it was acquired by AlterG), Hocoma (for which he served as the U.S. CEO and Global Head of Sales from September 2003 to November 2009), and Biodex Medical Systems (for which he served as the Head of Worldwide Sales from January 1997 to October 2002). Mr. Remsberg holds an AS in Business Administration from Suffolk County Community College.
Jeannine Lynch has served as our Vice President of Market Access and Strategy since August 2021. Prior to Lifeward, Ms. Lynch served as Senior Director of Patient Access Services at BioMarin Pharmaceuticals from April 2009 to September 2021. In addition to her work with BioMarin, Ms. Lynch has worked for industry leaders such as Genentech and Pfizer/Agouron. She has held leadership roles in commercial management, product launches and built customized patient services to address several different rare and ultrarare medical conditions. Ms. Lynch also served on the Board of Directors for MVP, a non-profit organization to help young people of color prepare, perform, progress, and prosper in their education, leadership and early professional careers. Ms. Lynch is a graduate of the University of California Berkeley and holds a Master of Public Health from the University of Michigan.
Almog Adar has served as our Vice President of Finance since December 2022 and as our Chief Accounting Officer since March 2022. From 2020 to December 2022, Mr. Adar served as our Director of Finance and Corporate Financial Controller. Prior to Lifeward, Mr. Adar served as Controller of Infinya Recycling Ltd. (previously Amnir Recycling) from January 2018 until December 2019. From January 2016 until December 2017, Mr. Adar served as Assistant Controller of Delta Galil Industries. Mr. Adar has a Bachelor of Arts degree in Accounting and Economics from the Open University of Israel and is a Certified Public Accountant licensed by the Israeli Ministry of Justice.
Board Leadership Structure
Although the Board does not currently have a formal policy requiring the offices of Chairman of the Board and CEO to be separate, the Israel Companies Law provides that one individual cannot serve as both Chairman and CEO, unless the shareholders approve such dual role, with each such approval to be valid for not more than three years. Currently, we have separated the positions of CEO and Chairman of the Board in recognition of the differences between the two roles. The CEO is responsible for the day-to-day leadership and performance of the Company, while the Chairman of the Board (in collaboration with other members of the Board) sets the strategic direction of the Company, provides guidance to the management, sets the agenda for the Board meetings (in collaboration with the other members of the Board) and presides over meetings of the Board. We believe that the current separation between Chairman and CEO allows each of them to better focus on their designated responsibilities. In addition, we believe that the current separation provides a more effective monitoring and objective evaluation of the performance of the CEO. The Board believes it is important that the Company retain organizational flexibility to determine whether the roles of CEO and Chairman of the Board should be separated or combined.
Risk Management
The Board is actively involved in the oversight and management of risks that could affect the Company. This oversight and management is conducted primarily through committees of the Board, as disclosed in the descriptions of each of the committees above and in the charters of each of the committees, but the full Board has retained responsibility for general oversight of risks. The Board regularly receives reports from members of senior management on areas of material risk to the Company, including operational (which itself includes cybersecurity matters), financial, regulatory and legal. The audit committee oversees management of financial risks (including liquidity and credit), approves all transactions with related persons and is primarily responsible for oversight of the Company’s financial reporting process and internal control over financial reporting. The compensation committee is responsible for overseeing the management of risks relating to the Company’s executive compensation plans and arrangements. The nominating and corporate governance committee oversees the Company’s corporate governance programs, including the administration of the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics. The Board discharges its oversight responsibility through full reports by each committee chair regarding the relevant committee’s actions, as well as through regular reports directly from officers responsible for oversight of particular risks within the Company.
Opt-Out of Certain Israel Companies Law Requirements
As an Israeli company, we are required to comply with the requirements of the Israel Companies Law and the regulations promulgated thereunder. Until early 2018, our Board was required to include at least two “external directors” as defined under the Israel Companies Law. In addition, we were required to comply with certain requirements under the Israel Companies Law regarding the composition of our audit committee and compensation committee, including requirements relating to the inclusion and role of the external directors on such committees. Pursuant to regulations then promulgated under the Israel Companies Law, however, we - as a company that does not have a controlling shareholder, and that complies with the U.S. securities laws and the corporate governance rules of the Nasdaq Stock Market (“Nasdaq”) - were permitted to “opt out” of the requirement to appoint external directors as well as the above requirements related to the composition of the audit committee and the compensation committee.
In February 2018, our Board determined that opting out of the requirements under the Israel Companies Law regarding the appointment of external directors and the composition of our audit committee and compensation committee would reduce our administrative and financial burden and provide greater flexibility in attracting highly-qualified directors, while maintaining appropriate corporate governance standards. Accordingly, we opted out of such requirements. As a result, our Board is no longer required to include two external directors, and our audit committee and compensation committee do not need to comply with certain committee composition requirements under the Israel Companies Law.
Director Independence
Our Board has determined that, other than Larry Jasinski, our CEO, all of our current directors, and each former director who served as a member of the Board during the last fiscal year, are independent under Nasdaq listing standards. Furthermore, our Board also determined that all current members of the audit committee, compensation committee, and nominating and corporate governance committee are independent under the applicable Nasdaq listing standards and rules and regulations of the SEC. In making its determinations regarding independence, the Board carefully reviewed the categorical tests enumerated in the Nasdaq independence definition, as well as the individual circumstances of each director with regard to each director’s business and personal activities as they may relate to the Company and our management.
Nasdaq Listing Standards
The Nasdaq definition of “independent director” includes a series of objective tests. Specifically, a director is deemed independent under the Nasdaq rules if such director is not an executive officer or employee of the Company or any other individual having a relationship which, in the opinion of the company’s Board, would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director. Generally, the following persons are not considered independent, among others:
•
a director who is, or at any time during the past three years was, employed by the company;
•
a director who accepted or who has a family member who accepted any compensation from the company in excess of $120,000 during any period of twelve consecutive months within the three years preceding the determination of independence, other than compensation for board or board committee service, compensation paid to a family member who is an employee (other than an executive officer) of the company, or benefits under a tax-qualified retirement plan, or non-discretionary compensation;
•
a director who is a family member of an individual who is, or at any time during the past three years was, employed by the company as an executive officer;
•
a director who is, or has a family member who is, a partner in, or a controlling shareholder or an executive officer of, any organization to which the company made, or from which the company received, payments for property or services in the current or any of the past three fiscal years that exceed 5% of the recipient’s consolidated gross revenues for that year, or $200,000, whichever is more, other than the following: (i) payments arising solely from investments in the company’s securities; or (ii) payments under non-discretionary charitable contribution matching programs;
•
a director who is, or has a family member who is, employed as an executive officer of another entity where at any time during the past three years any of the executive officers of the company serve on the compensation committee of such other entity; and
•
a director who is, or has a family member who is, a current partner of the company’s outside auditor, or was a partner or employee of the company’s outside auditor who worked on the company’s audit at any time during any of the past three years.
Audit Committee
We have a separately designated standing audit committee. The audit committee currently consists of Mr. Robert Marshall, Dr. John William Poduska and Mr. Hadar Levy. Mr. Marshall serves as the chairman of the audit committee. The audit committee holds a minimum of four meetings per year and will meet more frequently as circumstances require. The audit committee met five times during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024.
Israel Companies Law Requirements
Under the Israel Companies Law, we are required to appoint an audit committee. As discussed above under “Opt-Out of Certain Israel Companies Law Requirements,” in February 2018 we opted out of certain additional Israel Companies Law requirements relating to the audit committee, including certain requirements as to the composition of our audit committee.
Nasdaq Listing Standards and SEC Requirements
Under the Nasdaq corporate governance rules, we are required to maintain an audit committee consisting of at least three independent directors, each of whom is financially literate and one of whom has accounting or related financial management expertise. Additionally, we must state whether any members of the audit committee qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert” under Item 407(d) of Regulation S-K as promulgated by the SEC.
All members of the audit committee meet the requirements for financial literacy under the applicable rules and regulations of the SEC and the Nasdaq corporate governance rules. Our Board has determined that each of Robert Marshall and Hadar Levy is an “audit committee financial expert” as defined by the SEC rules and has the requisite financial sophistication as defined by the Nasdaq corporate governance rules.
Each of the current audit committee members is “independent” as such term is defined under the Nasdaq corporate governance rules and under Rule 10A-3(b)(1) under the Exchange Act, which is different from the general test for independence of board members and members of other committees.
Audit Committee Role
Our Board has adopted an audit committee charter that sets forth the responsibilities of the audit committee consistent with the rules of the SEC and the Nasdaq corporate governance rules, as well as the requirements for such committee under the Israel Companies Law, including the following:
•
overseeing our independent registered public accounting firm and recommending the engagement, compensation or termination of engagement of our independent registered public accounting firm to the Board in accordance with Israeli law;
•
reviewing regularly the senior members of the independent auditor’s team, including the lead audit partner and reviewing partner;
•
pre-approving the terms of audit, audit-related and permitted non-audit services provided by the independent registered public accounting firm;
•
recommending the engagement or termination of the person filling the office of our internal auditor;
•
reviewing periodically with management, the internal auditor and the independent registered public accounting firm the adequacy and effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting; and
•
reviewing with management and the independent registered public accounting firm the annual and quarterly financial statements of the Company prior to filing with the SEC.
The charter of the audit committee is available at https://ir.golifeward.com/corporate-governance/charters-and-policies. Information contained on, or that can be accessed through, our website does not constitute a part of this annual report and is not incorporated by reference herein.
The audit committee provides assistance to our Board in fulfilling its legal and fiduciary obligations in matters involving our accounting, auditing, financial reporting, internal control over financial reporting and legal compliance. Specifically, the audit committee pre-approves the services performed by our independent registered public accounting firm and reviews the firm’s reports regarding our accounting practices and systems of internal control over financial reporting. The audit committee also oversees the audit efforts of our independent registered public accounting firm and takes those actions that it deems necessary to satisfy itself that such accountants are in fact independent of management.
Under the Israel Companies Law, the audit committee is responsible for:
•
determining whether there are deficiencies in the business management practices of the Company and making recommendations to our Board to improve such practices;
•
determining whether to approve certain related party transactions, and classifying transactions in which a controlling shareholder has a personal benefit or other interest as significant or insignificant (which affects the required approvals) (see “-Approval of Related Party Transactions under Israeli Law” below);
•
examining our internal controls and internal auditor’s performance, including whether the internal auditor has sufficient resources and tools to dispose of its responsibilities, and in certain cases approving the annual work plan of our internal auditor;
•
examining the scope of our auditor’s work and compensation and submitting a recommendation with respect thereto to our Board or shareholders, depending on which of them is considering the appointment of our auditor; and
•
establishing procedures for the handling of employees’ complaints as to the deficiencies in the management of our business and the protection to be provided to such employees.
The audit committee may not approve any actions requiring its approval unless at the time of the approval a majority of the committee’s members are present. See “-Approval of Related Party Transactions under Israeli Law” below.
Compensation Committee
We have a separately designated standing compensation committee. The compensation committee currently consists of Ms. Randel E. Richner, Mr. Joseph Turk, and Dr. John William Poduska. Dr. Poduska serves as the chairman of the compensation committee. The compensation committee meets as circumstances require and held five meetings during the year ended December 31, 2024.
Israel Companies Law Requirements
Under the Israel Companies Law, the board of directors of a public company must appoint a compensation committee. As discussed above under “Opt-Out of Certain Israel Companies Law Requirements,” in February 2018 we opted out of certain additional Israel Companies Law requirements relating to the compensation committee, including certain requirements as to the composition of our compensation committee.
The duties of the compensation committee include the recommendation to the company’s board of directors of a compensation policy regarding the terms of engagement of directors and of specified members of senior management. That compensation policy must be adopted by the company’s board of directors, after considering the recommendations of the compensation committee, and must then be approved by the company’s shareholders, which approval requires a Special Approval for Compensation (as defined below under “-Approval of Related Party Transactions under Israeli Law- Disclosure of Personal Benefits or Other Interests of an Office Holder and Approval of Certain Transactions”). Our Board adopted a compensation policy, which our shareholders approved at the annual general meeting of our shareholders held on September 13, 2024 (the “Compensation Policy”).
The compensation policy of an Israeli company must serve as the basis for decisions concerning the financial terms of employment or engagement of office holders, including compensation, benefits, exculpation, insurance and indemnification. The compensation policy must take into account certain factors, including advancement of the company’s objectives, the company’s business plan and its long-term strategy, and creation of appropriate incentives. It must also consider, among other things, the company’s risk management, size and the nature of its operations. The compensation policy must include certain principles, such as: a link between variable compensation and long-term performance and measurable criteria; the relationship between variable and fixed compensation; and the minimum holding or vesting period for variable, equity-based compensation. We believe that the Compensation Policy satisfies these requirements.
The compensation committee is responsible for (a) recommending the Compensation Policy to our Board for its approval (and subsequent approval by our shareholders) and (b) carrying out duties related to the Compensation Policy and to the compensation of our directors and senior management, including:
•
reviewing and making recommendations regarding our Compensation Policy at least every three years;
•
recommending to the Board periodic updates to the Compensation Policy;
•
assessing implementation of the Compensation Policy;
•
approving compensation terms of executive officers, directors and employees affiliated with controlling shareholders; and
•
exempting certain compensation arrangements from the requirement to obtain shareholder approval under the Israel Companies Law.
Nasdaq Listing Standards and Section 16 of the Exchange Act
Under the Nasdaq corporate governance rules, we are required to maintain a compensation committee consisting of at least two independent directors. Each of the members of the compensation committee is required to be independent under the Nasdaq listing standards relating to compensation committee members, which are different from the general test for independence of the Board and members of other committees. In assessing independence, the Board considered all factors specifically relevant to determining whether a director has a relationship to the Company which is material to that director’s ability to be independent from management in connection with the duties of a compensation committee member and determined that each of the members of the compensation committee satisfies those requirements. Additionally, transactions between us and our directors and executive officers will be considered exempt from short-swing liability under Section 16(b) of the Exchange Act if approved by our Board or a committee composed solely of two or more “non-employee directors,” as defined in Rule 16b-3 under the Exchange Act (“Rule 16b-3”). Our Board has determined that each of the members of the compensation committee is a “non-employee director,” as defined in Rule 16b-3.
Compensation Committee Role
Our Board has adopted a compensation committee charter setting forth the responsibilities of the committee, which include:
•
reviewing and approving the granting of options and other incentive awards under the Company’s equity compensation plans to the extent such authority is delegated by our Board;
•
recommending the Company’s compensation policy and reviewing that policy from time to time both with respect to the CEO and other office holders and generally, including to assess the need for periodic updates;
•
reviewing and approving corporate goals relevant to the compensation of the CEO and other officers and evaluating the performance of the CEO and other officers; and
•
reviewing, evaluating and making recommendations regarding the compensation and benefits for our non-employee directors.
The charter of the compensation committee is available at https://ir.golifeward.com/corporate-governance/charters-and-policies. Information contained on, or that can be accessed through, our website does not constitute a part of this annual report and is not incorporated by reference herein.
Subject to applicable law, the compensation committee may delegate its authority to subcommittees established from time to time by the committee. Such subcommittees shall consist of one or more members of the committee or the board and shall report to the committee. The compensation committee is authorized to retain and terminate compensation consultants, legal counsel or other advisors to the committee and to approve the engagement of any such consultant, counsel or advisor, to the extent it deems necessary or appropriate after specifically analyzing the independence of any such consultant retained by the compensation committee.
Compensation Consultant
The compensation committee has authority to retain compensation consulting firms to assist it in the evaluation of executive officer and employee compensation and benefit programs. The compensation committee has retained Aon Hewitt (“Aon”) as its independent compensation advisor. Aon provides an objective perspective as to the reasonableness of our executive compensation programs and practices and their effectiveness in supporting our business and compensation objectives, as well as our equity compensation plans and number of shares available for grants.
Although Aon regularly consults with management in performing work requested by the compensation committee, it did not perform any separate additional services for management. The compensation committee has assessed the independence of Aon pursuant to applicable SEC rules and concluded that no conflict of interest exists that would prevent Aon from independently representing the compensation committee.
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
The nominating and corporate governance committee currently consists of Ms. Randel E. Richner and Mr. Michael Swinford. Ms. Richner serves as the chairman of the nominating and corporate governance committee. The nominating and corporate governance committee meets as circumstances require, with two meetings having taken place during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024. Our Board has adopted a nominating and corporate governance committee charter that sets forth the responsibilities of the nominating and corporate governance committee, which include:
•
overseeing and assisting our Board in reviewing and recommending nominees for election as directors;
•
reviewing and evaluating recommendations regarding management succession;
•
assessing the performance of the members of our Board; and
•
establishing and maintaining effective corporate governance policies and practices, including, but not limited to, developing and recommending to our Board a code of conduct.
The nominating and corporate governance committee considers proposals from a number of sources, including recommendations for nominees from shareholders submitted upon written notice to the chairman of the nominating and corporate governance committee, c/o Lifeward Ltd., 200 Donald Lynch Blvd, Marlborough, MA 01752. Other sources include referrals from other directors, members of management and the Company’s advisors. When considering a person to be recommended for nomination as a director, the nomination and governance committee evaluates, whether sourced by a shareholder or otherwise, among other factors, experience, accomplishments, education, skills, personal and professional integrity, diversity of the Board and the candidate’s ability to devote the necessary time for service as a director (including directorships and other positions held at other corporations and organizations). The nominating and governance committee does not use different standards to evaluate nominees depending on whether they are proposed by our directors and management or by our shareholders.
The nominating and corporate governance committee has no specific policy on director diversity. However, the Board reviews diversity of viewpoints, background, experience, accomplishments, education and skills when evaluating nominees. The Board believes that such diversity is important because it provides varied perspectives and promotes active and constructive discussion among directors and between the Board and management, resulting in more effective oversight of management’s formulation and implementation of strategic initiatives. In addition, in the Board’s executive sessions and in annual performance evaluations conducted by the Board and its committees, the Board from time to time considers whether the Board’s composition promotes a constructive and collegial environment. In determining whether an incumbent director should stand for reelection, the nominating and corporate governance committee considers the above factors, as well as that director’s personal and professional integrity, attendance, preparedness, participation and candor and other relevant factors as determined by the Board. Additionally, under Israeli law, if at the time of election of a director, all of the members of the Board are of the same gender, the director to be elected must be of the other gender. The charter of the nominating and corporate governance committee is available at https://ir.golifeward.com/corporate-governance/charters-and-policies. Information contained on, or that can be accessed through, our website does not constitute a part of this annual report and is not incorporated by reference herein.
Delinquent Section 16(a) Reports
Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires that the Company’s directors, executive officers and persons who own more than 10% of our outstanding ordinary shares file with the SEC initial reports of ownership in our ordinary shares and reports of changes in ownership in our ordinary shares. Based solely on a review of reports filed during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024 and certain of our internal records, we believe that all Section 16(a) filing requirements applicable to our directors, officers and greater than 10% beneficial owners were satisfied on a timely basis, except for one Form 4 filed late by Michael Swinford on November 25, 2024, such report relating to one transaction not reported in the time period specified by the rule.
Code of Ethics
We have adopted a Code of Conduct and Ethics (the “Code of Ethics”), which applies to all officers, directors and employees. The Code of Ethics is available on our website at https://ir.golifeward.com/corporate-governance/charters-and-policies. Any amendments to the Code of Ethics, or any waivers of its requirements, are expected to be disclosed on our website to the extent required by applicable rules and exchange requirements, including in order to satisfy Item 5.05 of Form 8-K. The reference to our website address here and elsewhere in this proxy statement does not constitute incorporation by reference of the information contained at or available through our website.
Policy Prohibiting Insider Trading and Related Procedure
We have adopted insider trading policies and procedures governing the purchase, sale, and other dispositions of our securities by directors, officers, and employees that we believe are reasonably designed to promote compliance with insider trading laws, rules and regulations, and applicable Nasdaq listing standards. Our insider trading policy states, among other things, that our directors, officers, and employees are prohibited from trading in such securities while in possession of material, nonpublic information. The foregoing summary of our insider trading policies and procedures does not purport to be complete and is qualified by reference to our Insider Trading Policy filed as an exhibit to this Annual Report on Form 10-K. In addition, with regard to the Company's trading in its own securities, it is our policy to comply with the federal securities laws and the applicable exchange listing requirements.

---

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
ITEM 11 . EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
As a smaller reporting company, we have opted to comply with the executive compensation rules otherwise applicable to “smaller reporting companies,” as such term is defined in Rule 12b-2 under the Exchange Act.
This section provides certain compensation-related information for (1) all individuals who served as our CEO during any part of the year ended December 31, 2024, and (2) our two most highly compensated executive officers (other than our CEO) who were serving as executive officers as of December 31, 2024 (together, our “Named Executive Officers”).
Named Executive Officers
Our Named Executive Officers for the year ended December 31, 2024, which consists of our principal executive officer and our two other most highly compensated executive officers, are:
• Larry Jasinski, our CEO;
• Charles Remsberg, our Chief Sales Officer; and
• Jeannine Lynch, our Vice President of Market Access and Strategy.
2024 Summary Compensation Table
The following table provides information regarding the total compensation awarded to, earned by, or paid to our Named Executive Officers for services rendered to us in all capacities for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2023, and 2024.
Name and
Principal
Position
Year
Salary
($)
Stock Awards
($)(1)
Non-Equity
Incentive Plan Compensation($)
Total
($)
Larry Jasinski,
Chief Executive Officer and Director
442,312
-
30,962
(2)
473,274
442,312
167,714
278,657
(3)
888,683
Charles Remsberg,
Chief Sales Officer
375,000
-
-
375,000
125,000
140,857
-
265,857
Jeannine Lynch,
Vice President of Market Access and Strategy
359,004
-
-
359,004
351,104
82,500
113,058
(3)
546,662
(1)
Amounts represent the aggregate grant date fair value of such awards computed in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718 (“FASB ASC Topic 718”). The fair value of restricted stock units (“RSUs”) granted is determined based on the price of the Company’s ordinary shares on the date of grant. This amount does not correspond to the actual value that may be recognized by the Named Executive Officer upon the vesting and subsequent settlement of the restricted stock units. The valuation assumptions used in determining such amounts are described in Notes 2m and 9b to our consolidated financial statements included in our 2024 Annual Report.
(2)
Amounts represent the annual bonuses paid with respect to achievement of the Company and, if applicable, individual performance objectives on account of fiscal year 2024.
(3)
Amounts represent the annual bonuses paid with respect to achievement of the Company and, if applicable, individual performance objectives on account of fiscal year 2023.
Pursuant to regulations promulgated under the Israel Companies Law, we are required to disclose the total compensation earned during 2024 by our five most highly-compensated office holders (as defined in the Israel Companies Law). Three of such individuals are our Named Executive Officers, as defined above, and their respective total compensation for 2024 is set forth in the Summary Compensation Table. The other two individuals, and their respective total compensation for 2024, is as follows:
Name and
Principal
Position
Salary
($)
Stock Awards
($)(1)
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation($)(2)
All Other Compensation
($)
Total
($)
Michael Lawless,
Chief Financial Officer
323,621
-
11,410
-
335,031
Miri Pariente,
Vice President of Operations,
Regulatory and Quality(3)
191,048
-
10,000
94,303
(4)
295,351
(1)
Amounts represent the aggregate grant date fair value of such awards computed in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718 (“FASB ASC Topic 718”). The fair value of RSUs granted is determined based on the price of the Company’s ordinary shares on the date of grant. This amount does not correspond to the actual value that may be recognized by the individuals listed in the table above upon the vesting and subsequent settlement of the restricted stock units. The valuation assumptions used in determining such amounts are described in Notes 2m and 9b to our consolidated financial statements included in our 2024 Annual Report.
(2)
Amounts represent the annual bonuses paid with respect to achievement of the Company and, if applicable, individual performance objectives on account of fiscal year 2024.
(3)
The amounts set forth for each of Ms. Pariente and Mr. Adar in the columns “Salary,” “Non-Equity Incentive Plan,” and “All Other Compensation” represent payments, contributions and/or allocations that were made in New Israel Shekels (“NIS”) and have been translated to U.S. dollars according to the average exchange rate on the applicable period.
(4)
Consists of $55,929 for payments, contributions and/or allocations for social benefits and the aggregate incremental cost to the Company of $38,374 with respect to Ms. Pariente’s personal use of a Company-leased car.
Narrative Disclosure to the 2024 Summary Compensation Table
Our compensation committee reviews and approves the compensation of our executive officers and is primarily responsible for determining the compensation for the Named Executive Officers and office holders (within the meaning of the Israeli Companies Law) consistent with our overall executive compensation philosophy. Our compensation committee reviews and discusses the compensation of other officers with the chief executive officer and considers overall Company performance against goals, individual executive performance, and internal and external equity as key factors in those decisions. We develop our compensation programs after reviewing publicly available compensation data. Aon advises the compensation committee on all of the principal aspects of executive compensation. Aon attends meetings of the compensation committee when requested to do so. Aon reports directly to the compensation committee and not to management, although it meets with management for purposes of gathering information for its analyses and recommendations. The compensation committee has assessed the independence of Aon consistent with SEC regulations and Nasdaq listing standards and has concluded that the engagement of Aon does not raise any conflict of interest.
Base Salaries
At the beginning of 2024, our compensation committee reviewed and approved the base salaries of the Named Executive Officers based on an analysis of external market conditions and individual performance against goals. The table below sets forth the base salaries for each of the Named Executive Officers for 2024:
Name
2024 Base
Salary ($)
Larry Jasinski
442,312
Charles Remsberg
375,000
Jeannine Lynch
359,004
2024 Non-Equity Incentive Plan
All employees who have bonus features in their employment agreements, including our Named Executive Officers, were eligible to participate in a non-equity incentive plan for fiscal year 2024, pursuant to which employees were eligible to receive a bonus with respect to their performance in such year. Each Named Executive Officer’s target was equal to a specified percentage of his or her base salary, and the actual bonus is paid based on the achievement of certain business and personal performance objectives for the 2024 fiscal year. Not all goals were required to be satisfied for a Named Executive Officer to receive a portion of the bonus. The principal business performance objective under the non-equity incentive plan for 2024 was based on achieving specified financial goals or milestones as set forth in the Compensation Policy as approved by our shareholders. These objectives were allocated as 30% for revenue targets, 15% for market development targets and 30% for net loss targets. A personal performance objective, which is subjective in nature, made up the remaining 25%.
If the target was met in all categories of the business performance objective, 100% of the Named Executive Officer’s bonus was to be paid. The percentage of the bonus to be paid varied depending on the specific target and the level of achievement.
In February 2025, the compensation committee completed an evaluation of the Company’s overall performance for 2024 and the Named Executive Officers’ respective contributions in achieving this performance. The compensation committee’s review was based on Company performance against business objectives, as well as personal performance against individual goals established by the compensation committee. Following such review, our Board (following the recommendation of the compensation committee) approved the bonuses for the Named Executive Officers.
Equity Compensation
Our equity grant program is intended to align the interests of our Named Executive Officers with those of our shareholders and to motivate them to make important contributions to our performance. In 2024, no RSU grants were made due to the non-approval of the 2024 Incentive Compensation Plan.
Employee Benefits and Perquisites
We currently maintain the Lifeward, Inc. 401(k) Plan, a defined contribution plan, or the 401(k) Plan, for the benefit of our employees, including our Named Executive Officers, who satisfy certain eligibility requirements. Our Named Executive Officers were eligible to participate in the 401(k) Plan on the same terms as our other full-time employees. We believe that providing a vehicle for retirement savings though our 401(k) Plan adds to the overall desirability of our executive compensation package and further incentivizes our employees, including our Named Executive Officers.
Currently, we do not view perquisites or other personal benefits as a significant component of our Compensation Policy.
Equity Grant Timing
Our policies and practices regarding the granting of equity awards are carefully designed to ensure compliance with applicable securities laws and to maintain the integrity of our executive compensation program. The compensation committee of our board of directors is responsible for the timing and terms of equity awards to executives and other eligible employees.
The timing of equity award grants is determined with consideration to a variety of factors, including but not limited to, the achievement of pre-established performance goals and market conditions. We do not follow a predetermined schedule for the granting of equity awards. In determining the timing and terms of an equity award, the board of directors or the compensation committee may consider material nonpublic information to ensure that such grants are made in compliance with applicable laws and regulations. The board’s or the compensation committee’s procedures to prevent the improper use of material nonpublic information in connection with the granting of equity awards include oversight by legal counsel and, where appropriate, delaying the grant of equity awards until the public disclosure of such material nonpublic information.
We are committed to maintaining transparency in our executive compensation practices and to making equity awards in a manner that is not influenced by the timing of the disclosure of material nonpublic information for the purpose of affecting the value of executive compensation. We regularly review our policies and practices related to equity awards to ensure they meet the evolving standards of corporate governance.
Employment Agreements of Named Executive Officers
Each of Larry Jasinski, our CEO, Charles Remsberg, our Chief Sales Officer, and Jeannine Lynch, our Vice President of Market Access and Strategy, previously entered into an employment agreement with our Subsidiary. These employment agreements set forth their respective terms of employment, which terms are generally applicable to all of our executives, covering matters such as vacation, health and other benefits. The following are descriptions of the material terms of our Named Executive Officers’ employment agreements.
Larry Jasinski
On January 17, 2011, we entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Jasinski, pursuant to which he has served as the CEO of the Company since February 12, 2012 (as amended from time to time, the “Jasinski Employment Agreement”). The Jasinski Employment Agreement provides for an annual base salary, subject to annual increases in the discretion of, the Company, and an annual performance bonus. In accordance with previous shareholder approvals, and effective as of January 1, 2024, the annual base salary was $442,312. The annual performance bonus was originally set at up to 35% of annual base salary. In 2020, this was increased to an annual performance bonus of up to 70% of annual base salary for achieving 100% of targets (with adjustment upward or downward for performance exceeding or failing to meet such objectives, respectively).
In the event that Mr. Jasinski’s employment is terminated by the Company without “Cause” (as defined in the Jasinski Employment Agreement ), or if Mr. Jasinski terminates his employment for “Good Reason” (as defined in the Jasinski Employment Agreement), he will be entitled to certain severance payments and benefits, including: (i) a lump sum payment equal to 90 days of his base salary, (ii) an annual performance bonus (calculated based on the assumption that to the extent performance objectives were achieved in the six-month period preceding his termination, they will also be achieved in the six months following termination), (iii) reimbursement for any COBRA or other medical, dental and vision premiums for six months following his termination and (iv) continued participation in any employee and executive benefit programs in effect as of his termination and reimbursement for the premium or other fees associated with continuation in any insurance program available to the Company’s employees as a non-employee or in a comparable program if participation as a non-employee would be barred. The Jasinski Employment Agreement further provides that if Mr. Jasinski’s employment is terminated without Cause or by Mr. Jasinski for Good Reason, any unvested portion of the options promised in the Jasinski Employment Agreement, which would have vested during the six months following such termination had Mr. Jasinski remained employed by the Company, will automatically vest. If Mr. Jasinski terminates his employment without Good Reason, he will be entitled to receive a pro-rated amount of his annual performance bonus as determined in good faith by the Board. Mr. Jasinski is not entitled to any severance if he is terminated by the Company for Cause.
The Jasinski Employment Agreement was amended in 2020 to provide that if a “Change of Control” (as defined in the Jasinski Employment Agreement) occurs, and within one year following such Change of Control Mr. Jasinski is terminated without Cause or he resigns for Good Reason, Mr. Jasinski will be entitled to severance of 18 months’ salary as well as an annual bonus for the year in which the termination occurs (assuming achievement of 100% of milestones and targets set by the board of directors).
The employment agreement is governed by the laws of the State of Delaware and contains non-solicitation and non-competition covenants (each of which remains in effect during the term of employment and for 12 months following termination of employment) and trade secrets and inventions clauses.
Charles Remsberg
We entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Remsberg, pursuant to which he has served as our Chief Sales Officer since August 11, 2023 (as amended from time to time, the “Remsberg Employment Agreement”). The Remsberg Employment Agreement provides for an annual base salary of $375,000 and is subject to increases as may be determined from time to time by the compensation committee of the Board, and an annual performance bonus up to 35% of annual base salary, subject to the achievement of objectives as determined by the compensation committee of the Board. The Remsberg Employment Agreement also provides that Mr. Remsberg would receive, as an inducement grant, a restricted stock unit award covering 28,571 ordinary shares, as adjusted to reflect the 1-for-7 reverse share split of the ordinary shares effected by the Company on March 15, 2024 (the “Remsberg Inducement Award”), which award vests in four equal annual instalments commencing as of the grant date. The terms of the Remsberg Inducement Award are generally consistent with the terms applicable to restricted stock unit awards set forth in our 2014 Equity Incentive Plan (as amended from time to time, the “2014 Plan”); provided, however, that in the event Mr. Remsberg’s ’s employment with the Company is terminated by the Company (or its successor) not for “Cause”, or if Mr. Remsberg terminates his employment for “Good Reason” within 90 days prior to a Change of Control (as all such terms are defined in the Remsberg Employment Agreement) or one year following a Change of Control, the Remsberg Inducement Award will vest upon the later to occur of (i) the effective date of termination of employment, (ii) the release Effective Date (as defined in the Remsberg Employment Agreement) and (iii) the date such Change of Control is consummated.
The Remsberg Employment Agreement is for an initial term through August 11, 2025, and automatically renews for additional terms of twelve-months each, provided, however, that either party may terminate the Remsberg Employment Agreement, effective as of the last date of any renewal term by providing at least 90 days prior written notice. The Remsberg Employment Agreement also provides that the Company may terminate the Agreement immediately without providing prior notice in the event of death or disability, or for cause. In the event that Mr. Remsberg’s employment is terminated by the Company without cause or if Mr. Remsberg resigns for Good Reason not in connection with a Change of Control Event (as defined below), Mr. Remsberg will be entitled to a severance payment equal to (i) 50% of the sum of (a)his then-current base salary, plus (b) 50% of his annual Target Bonus (as defined in the Remsburg Employment Agreement), that Mr. Remsberg would have received had he not been terminated prior to the applicable payment date of the Target Bonus representing a pro-rated six-month payment of the annual target bonus, payable in equal instalments over a period of six months following such termination, and (iii) the replacement cost of his benefits for six months following such termination.
The Remsberg Employment Agreement provides that if a Change of Control occurs, and within 90 days prior or one year following such Change of Control Mr. Remsberg is terminated without Cause or he resigns for Good Reason (a “Change of Control Event”), Mr. Remsberg will be entitled to severance of 12 months of base salary, an amount equal to Mr. Remsberg’s annual target bonus (assuming achievement of 100% of milestones and targets set by the board of directors), payable promptly following such termination, and payment of the portion of COBRA premiums equal to the amount that we would have paid to provide health insurance to Mr. Remsberg had Mr. Remsberg remained employed with us for twelve months following such termination. In addition, as stated above, in the case of a Change of Control Event, the Remsberg Inducement Award will vest upon the effective date of termination of employment. The Remsberg Employment Agreement is governed by the laws of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts and contains non-solicitation and non-competition covenants (each of which remains in effect during the term of employment and for a period of 12 months following termination of employment) and trade secrets and inventions clauses.
Jeannine Lynch
On July 22, 2021, we entered into an employment agreement with Jeannine Lynch to serve as Vice President of Market Access and Strategy of the Company, effective August 31, 2021 (the “Lynch Employment Agreement”). Pursuant to the terms of the Lynch Employment Agreement, Ms. Lynch is entitled to (i) an annual base salary of $320,000, which was increased to $361,637 effective April 1, 2024, subject to increases as may be determined from time to time by the compensation committee of the Board and (ii) an annual performance bonus up to 35% of annual base salary, subject to the achievement of objectives as determined by the compensation committee of the Board. The Lynch Employment Agreement may be terminated by the Company upon prior written notice.
In the event that (x) Ms. Lynch’s employment is terminated for any reason other than for “cause” (as defined therein), death, or disability, (y) the Company moves its primary office outside of the United States and/or reduces Ms. Lynch’s title or primary responsibilities, or (z) the Company moves Ms. Lynch’s principal location of work, the Company shall pay monthly severance to Ms. Lynch at the rate per annum of her salary and bonus (and the replacement cost of her benefits) at the time of such termination for a period from the date of such termination to the date which is six months after such termination.
In the event that the Company is subject to a merger or acquisition where Ms. Lynch is terminated during the 12-month period following the closing of the transaction, 100% of the then-unvested and outstanding equity awards held by Ms. Lynch will vest upon such termination.
Ms. Lynch is not entitled to receive any termination or change in control benefits under our Compensation Policy.
The Lynch Employment Agreement is governed by the laws of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts and contains non-solicitation and non-competition covenants (each of which remains in effect during the term of employment and for a period of 12 months following termination of employment) and trade secrets and inventions clauses.
Outstanding Equity Awards at 2024 Fiscal Year-End
The following table sets forth information concerning outstanding equity awards as of December 31, 2024, for each Named Executive Officer. This information reflects the number of ordinary shares of the Company after the 1-for-7 reverse share split of the ordinary shares effected by the Company on March 15, 2024.
Option Awards
Stock Awards
Name
Grant Date(1)
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
Exercisable
(#)
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
Unexercisable
(#)
Option
Exercise
Price
($)
Option
Expiration
Date
Number of
Shares or
Units of
Stock
that Have
Not Vested
(#)
Market
Value of
Shares or
Units of
Stock that
Have Not Vested(2)
($)
Larry Jasinski
6/27/2017
(3)
-
367.50
6/27/2027
5/3/2018
(4)
1,249
-
188.13
5/3/2028
3/27/2019
(5)
1,774
-
37.56
3/27/2029
5/21/2021
(6)
5,357
9,268
8/2/2022
(7)
14,288
24,718
9/13/2023
(8)
21,429
37,072
Charles Remsberg
8/11/2023
(9)
21,429
37,072
Jeannine Lynch
8/31/2021
(10)
4,465
7,724
8/2/2022
(11)
9,823
16,994
6/30/2023
(12)
14,732
25,486
(1)
Represents grant dates of the stock option and RSU awards.
(2)
The amount listed in this column represents the product of $1.73, which was the closing market price of the Company’s ordinary shares as of December 31, 2024, multiplied by the number of shares subject to the award.
(3)
This award is fully vested.
(4)
This award is fully vested.
(5)
This award is full vested.
(6)
¼th of the RSU award vests on an annual basis commencing on May 21, 2022, and ending on May 21, 2025.
(7)
¼th of the RSU award vests on an annual basis commencing on August 2, 2023, and ending on August 2, 2026.
(8)
¼th of the RSU award vests on an annual basis commencing on September 13, 2024, and ending on September 13, 2027.
(9)
¼th of the RSU award vests on an annual basis commencing on August 11, 2024, and ending on August 11, 2027.
(10)
¼th of the RSU award vests on an annual basis commencing on August 31, 2022, and ending on August 31, 2025.
(11)
¼th of the RSU award vests on an annual basis commencing on August 2, 2023, and ending on August 2, 2026.
(12)
¼th of the RSU award vests on an annual basis commencing on June 30, 2024, and ending on June 30, 2027.
Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control
We have adopted, pursuant to shareholder approval, our Compensation Policy, which provides for certain benefits to our executive officers upon retirement or termination, whether or not in the event of a change in control. We may memorialize any of these benefits in arrangements we enter into with individual executive officers. Under the Compensation Policy, executive officers may be entitled to advance notice of termination of up to 12 months and to obtain up to 12 months of post-termination health insurance. In addition to receiving severance pay as required or facilitated under the local laws of the relevant jurisdiction, executive officers may have the right to receive up to 12 months of base salary (18 months in the case of the CEO), bonus and benefits, taking into account the period of the officer’s service or employment, his or her performance during employment and contribution to the Company’s targets and profits and the circumstances surrounding termination of his or her employment. These benefits are designed to attract and motivate highly skilled professionals to join our Company and to enable us to retain key management.
To the extent our Named Executive Officers are entitled to receive severance (except for any severance payments mandated by Israeli law for our Israeli employees) or change in control benefits, such entitlements are contractually agreed upon between the Company and the applicable Named Executive Officer. Accordingly, for further information regarding the payments and benefits our Named Executive Officers are entitled to receive upon a termination or change in control, please see “Executive Compensation - Employment Agreements of Named Executive Officers.”
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
None of the members of the compensation committee is, or has ever been, an officer or employee of the Company or any of its subsidiaries. In addition, during the last fiscal year, no executive officer of the Company served as a member of the board of directors or the compensation committee of another entity that has one or more executive officers serving on the Company’s compensation committee or the Board.
Policy for Recoupment of Incentive Compensation (Clawback Policy)
On September 13, 2023, we adopted an amended and restated policy for recoupment of incentive compensation (the “Clawback Policy”) in compliance with the requirements of the Dodd-Frank Act, final SEC rules and applicable Nasdaq listing standards (the “final clawback rules”), which covers our current and former executive officers, including all of our named executive officers. Under the Clawback Policy, in the event that we are required to prepare a restatement of our previously issued financial statements due to our material noncompliance with any financial reporting requirement under securities laws, we are required to recover (subject to certain limited exceptions described in the Clawback Policy and permitted under the final clawback rules) any cash or equity incentive-based compensation received by any current or former executive officer after the effective date of the Clawback Policy and in the three years prior to the date we are required to restate our financial statements that is in excess of the amount that would have been received based on the restated financial statements.
Director Compensation
The following table provides certain information concerning the compensation for services rendered in all capacities by each non-employee director serving on our Board during the year ended December 31, 2024, other than Mr. Larry Jasinski, our CEO, who did not receive additional compensation for his services as director and whose compensation is set forth in the Summary Compensation Table found elsewhere in this annual report.
Name
Fees Earned
in Cash ($)
Stock Awards
($)(1)
Total
($)
Jeff Dykan
25,455
(2)
-
25,455
Dr. John William Poduska
44,426
(3)
-
44,426
Randel Richner
39,332
(4)
-
39,332
Joseph Turk
39,417
(5)
-
39,417
Hadar Levy
34,447
(6)
-
34,447
Michael Swinford
25,598
(7)
50,000
75,598
Robert Marshall
8,164
(8)
-
8,164
(1)
Amounts represent the aggregate grant date fair value of such awards issued under the 2014 Plan as an annual award to the applicable directors, computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, which for all directors represents an award of 50,000 RSUs. These amounts reflect the number of ordinary shares of the Company after the 1-for-7 reverse share split of the ordinary shares effected by the Company on March 15, 2024. The fair value of RSUs granted is determined based on the price of the Company’s ordinary shares on the date of grant. This amount does not correspond to the actual value that may be recognized by the non-employee director upon the vesting of the RSUs. All RSUs become vested and exercisable in four equal quarterly instalments starting three months following the grant date. The valuation assumptions used in determining such amounts are described in Notes 2m and 9b to our consolidated financial statements included in our 2024 Annual Report.
(2)
Represents $15,796 earned by Mr. Dykan as a portion of the annual retainer for serving as our Chairman of the Board of Directors, $7,065 for attending meetings of the Board of Directors, $2,594 for serving as a chairman of the audit committee. Mr. Dykan resigned from his positions as a member of the Board and as Chairman of the Board of Directors effective September 4, 2024.
(3)
Represents $22,570 earned by Dr. Poduska as an annual retainer for serving as a non-employee director on the Board of Directors, $12,823 for attending meetings of the Board of Directors, $4,519 for serving as a member of the audit committee, $4,514 for serving as the chairman of the compensation committee.
(4)
Represents $22,570 earned by Ms. Richner as an annual retainer for serving as a non-employee director on the Board of Directors, $12,949 for attending meetings of the Board of Directors, $3,813 for serving as a member of the compensation committee.
(5)
Represents $11,348 earned by Mr. Turk as a portion of the annual retainer for serving as our Chairman of the Board of Directors, $11,222 as an annual retainer for serving as a non-employee director on the Board of Directors, $13,056 for attending meetings of the Board of Directors and $3,791 for serving as a member of the compensation committee. Mr. Turk was appointed Chairman of the Board of Directors effective September 4, 2024.
(6)
Represents $22,570 earned by Mr. Levy as an annual retainer for serving as a non-employee director on the Board of Directors, $7,825 for attending meetings of the Board of Directors and $4,052 for serving as a member of the audit committee.
(7)
Represents $15,851 earned by Mr. Swinford as a portion of the annual retainer for serving as a non-employee director on the Board of Directors, $9,747 for attending meetings of the Board of Directors. Mr Swinford joined the Board of Directors on April 18, 2024, and his retainer was prorated accordingly.
(8)
Represents $3,710 earned by Mr. Marshall as a portion of the annual retainer for serving as a non-employee director on the Board of Directors, $2,528 for attending meetings of the Board of Directors and $1,926 for serving as a member of the audit committee. Mr Marshall joined the Board of Directors on November 2, 2024, and his retainer was prorated accordingly.
The aggregate number of ordinary shares subject to outstanding options and RSU awards for each of our non-employee directors as of December 31, 2024, is shown below. These amounts reflect the number of ordinary shares of the Company after the 1-for-7 reverse share split of the ordinary shares effected by the Company on March 15, 2024. Information regarding Mr. Jasinski’s outstanding equity awards as of December 31, 2024, is set forth in the Outstanding Equity Awards Table found elsewhere in this annual report.
Name
Number of Shares
Dr. John William Poduska
Randel Richner
-
Joseph Turk
-
Hadar Levy
-
Hadar Levy
-
Michael Swinford
5,020
Robert Marshall
-
Cash compensation for our independent, non-employee directors’ services is governed by previous decisions of our compensation committee, Board and shareholders, and is subject to terms and conditions of our Compensation Policy. Additionally, each independent, non-employee director currently receives upon his or her appointment a restricted stock unit award (the “Initial RSU Award”), with such Initial RSU Award having a value equal to $50,000 on the date of grant (as determined based on the closing price of our ordinary shares on the date of grant). Each independent, non-employee director is also entitled to receive an annual grant of RSUs (the “Annual RSU Award”), with such Annual RSU Award having a value equal to $50,000 on the date of grant. The Initial RSU Award and Annual RSU Award each vest ratably in four equal quarterly instalments starting three months from the date of grant (subject to the non-employee director’s continued service with the Company through each applicable vesting date), with the vesting of such awards to be accelerated upon certain change of control events in accordance with the Compensation Policy. At our 2020 annual general meeting, our shareholders approved an amendment to our then-current Compensation Policy whereby (x) all or a portion of our non-directors’ cash compensation may be paid in equity, at the discretion of our compensation committee, in order to preserve the Company’s cash, and (y) equity compensation of directors will be payable in the first instance in RSUs but such compensation may also be payable, at the discretion of our compensation committee, in cash, based on a formula to be determined and with such payment provisions as shall result in the equivalent effect of vesting of RSUs, in order to preserve the equity available for incentives.
In addition, each director is reimbursed for out-of-pocket expenses in connection with attending meetings of the Board of Directors or committees. Directors are also indemnified and insured by us for actions associated with being a director to the extent permitted under Israeli law. Further, none of our non-employee directors receive any benefits upon termination of their directorship positions. The compensation committee reviews director compensation annually and makes recommendations to the Board of Directors with respect to compensation and benefits provided to the members of the Board.

---

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
As of March 3, 2025, there were 10,630,281 ordinary shares outstanding, excluding ordinary shares issuable in connection with the exercise of outstanding warrants or outstanding options or upon the vesting of restricted stock units (“RSUs”). The voting rights of all shareholders are the same.
The following table sets forth certain information as of March 3, 2025, concerning the number of ordinary shares beneficially owned, directly or indirectly, by:
(1) each person, or group of affiliated persons, known to us to beneficially own more than 5% of our outstanding ordinary shares;
(2) each of our directors and director nominees;
(3) each of our Named Executive Officers (as defined under “Summary Compensation Table” above); and
(4) all of our directors and executive officers as a group.
Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the SEC based on voting and investment power with respect to such shares. Shares subject to options or warrants that are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of March 3, 2025 and shares subject to RSUs that were vested as of or will vest within 60 days of March 3, 2025 are deemed to be outstanding and to be beneficially owned by the person holding such options, RSUs or warrants for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of such person. However, such shares are not deemed to be outstanding and to be beneficially owned for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of any other person.
Under the terms of the terms of certain outstanding warrants, a holder may not exercise the warrants to the extent that such shareholder, together with its affiliates, would beneficially own, after such exercise, more than 4.99% or 9.99% of the ordinary shares then outstanding, as applicable (subject to the right of the shareholder with a 4.99% ownership limitation to increase or decrease such beneficial ownership limitation upon notice to us, provided that such limitation cannot exceed 9.99%), and provided that any increase in the beneficial ownership limitation shall not be effective until 61 days after such notice is delivered. Consistent with beneficial ownership reporting principles under Section 13(d) of the Exchange Act, the below table only shows ordinary shares underlying warrants that are deemed to be beneficially owned, assuming compliance with these ownership limitations.
All information with respect to the beneficial ownership of any principal shareholder has been furnished by such shareholder or is based on our filings with the SEC and, unless otherwise indicated below, we believe that persons named in the table have sole voting and sole investment power with respect to all the ordinary shares shown as beneficially owned, subject to community property laws, where applicable. The ordinary shares beneficially owned by our directors and officers may include shares owned by their respective family members, as to which such directors and officers disclaim beneficial ownership. Unless otherwise noted below, each shareholder’s address is c/o Lifeward Ltd., 200 Donald Lynch Blvd., Marlborough, MA 01752.
Ordinary Shares Beneficially Owned
Name
Number of
Shares
Percentage
5%-or-More Beneficial Owners:
Lind Global Funds(1)
857,996
8.1
%
Named Executive Officers and Directors:
Larry Jasinski(2)
65,455
*
Randel Richner(3)
21,567
*
Dr. John William Poduska(4)
20,102
*
Joseph Turk(5)
33,134
*
Hadar Levy(6)
15,656
*
Michael Swinford(7)
65,040
*
Robert Marshall(8)
-
*
Jeannine Lynch(9)
18,641
*
Michael A. Lawless(10)
26,112
*
Charles Remsberg (11)
7,142
*
Almog Adar(12)
16,515
*
All directors and executive officers as a group (eleven persons) (13)
289,364
2.7
%
* Ownership of less than 1%.
(1) Based on a Schedule 13D/A filed on January 8, 2025, by Lind Global Fund II LP (“Global Fund II”), Lind Global Partners II LLC, Lind Global Macro Fund LP, Lind Global Partners LLC (together, the “Lind Global Funds”) and Jeff Easton (together with the Lind Global Funds, the “Reporting Persons”). The foregoing excludes warrants to purchase 247,334 ordinary shares, because each of the warrants includes a provision limiting the holder’s ability to exercise the warrants if such exercise would cause the holder to beneficially own greater than 9.99% of the ordinary shares then outstanding. Without such provisions, the Reporting Persons may have been deemed to have beneficial ownership of the ordinary shares underlying such warrants. Jeff Easton, the managing member of Lind Global Partners II LLC and Lind Global Partners LLC, may be deemed to have sole voting and dispositive power with respect to the shares held by Lind Global Macro Fund, LP and Lind Global Fund II LP. The principal business address of the Reporting Persons is 444 Madison Avenue, Floor 41, New York, N.Y. 10022.
(2) Consists of 61,719 ordinary shares, including 3,750 shares underlying RSUs vesting within 60 days, and 3,736 exercisable options to purchase ordinary shares.
(3) Consists of 21,567 ordinary shares.
(4) Consists of 20,033 ordinary shares, including exercisable options to purchase 69 ordinary shares.
(5) Consists of 33,134 ordinary shares.
(6) Consists of 16,656 ordinary shares.
(7) Consists of 65,040 ordinary shares, including 2,510 shares underlying RSUs vesting within 60 days.
(8) Mr. Marshall was appointed to our Board effective November 2, 2024.
(9) Consists of 18,641 ordinary shares.
(10) Consists of 26,112 ordinary shares.
(11) Consists of 7,142 ordinary shares.
(12) Consists of 16,515 ordinary shares.
(13) Consists of (i) 279,299 ordinary shares directly or beneficially owned by our executive officers and our nine directors other than Mr. Jasinski; (ii) 3,805 ordinary shares constituting the cumulative aggregate number of options granted to the executive officers and directors; and (iii) 6,260 shares underlying RSUs vesting within 60 days.
Equity Compensation Plan Information
The following table provides certain aggregate information with respect to our ordinary shares that may be issued under our equity compensation plans as of December 31, 2024. On August 19, 2014, we adopted the 2014 Plan. Pursuant to Section 1.3 of the 2014 Plan, no awards can be granted under the plan on or after ten years from the date of adoption of the 2014 Plan. As a result, since August 19, 2024, we cannot grant any additional equity awards under the 2014 Plan. In addition, as of the date of this annual report our shareholders have not approved a new equity incentive compensation plan. Accordingly, at this time we cannot grant equity awards under an equity compensation plan approved by our shareholders.
The information below reflects a number of ordinary shares of the Company after the 1-for-7 reverse share split of the ordinary shares effected by the Company on March 15, 2024.
Plan Category
Number of
securities to
be issued
upon exercise
of outstanding options,
warrants and
rights
Weighted-
average
exercise price
of outstanding
options,
warrants and
rights
Number of
securities
remaining
available for
future issuance
under equity
compensation
plans (excluding
securities
reflected in
first column)
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders
331,816
(1)
$
187.94
(2)
-
(3)
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders
-
-
-
Total
331,816
$
187.94
-
(1) Represents shares issuable under our 2014 Plan upon exercise of options outstanding to purchase 4,573 shares and upon the settlement of outstanding RSUs with respect to 327,243 shares.
(2) The weighted-average exercise price is calculated based solely on the exercise prices of the outstanding options to purchase ordinary shares. It does not reflect the ordinary shares that will be issued upon the vesting of outstanding awards of RSUs, which have no exercise price.
(3) As described above, since August 19, 2024, we cannot grant any additional equity awards under the 2014 Plan, and as of the date of this annual report our shareholders have not approved a new equity incentive compensation plan. Accordingly, at this time we cannot grant any equity awards under an equity compensation plan approved by our shareholders.

---

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
ITEM 13 . CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
Director Independence
The information required by Item 407(a) of Regulation S-K is incorporated by reference herein from Item 10 above as set forth under the caption “Director Independence.”
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
See “Item 11. Executive Compensation -Employment Agreements of Named Executive Officers” above for a description of employment agreements between us and the Named Executive Officers.
We describe below transactions and series of similar transactions which are currently proposed or to which we have been or were a party since January 1, 2023, in which (a) the amount involved exceeds or exceeded the lesser of $120,000 or one percent of the average of the Company’s total assets at year-end for the last two completed fiscal years and (b) any of our directors, executive officers, beneficial owners of more than 5% of our ordinary shares, or any affiliates or members of the immediate family of any of the foregoing persons, had or will have a direct or indirect material interest. Although we do not have a formal written policy as to the approval of related party transactions, all related party transactions for which disclosure would be required under Item 404 of Regulation S-K are approved based on procedures under Israeli law, as is duly memorialized in the minutes of the meetings of the Board and audit committee, as applicable.
Transactions with Current and/or Former 5% Beneficial Owners
Since January 1, 2023, we entered into the following transactions with other shareholders who are currently 5% beneficial owners or who we believe beneficially owned at the time of such transactions or became as a result of such transactions more than 5% of our ordinary shares, based on a review of Schedule 13G filings made and Company records during such period.
Agreements with Directors, Officers and Others
Employment Agreements
We have entered into written employment agreements with each of our executive officers. These agreements provide for notice periods of varying duration for termination of the agreement by us or by the relevant executive officer, during which time the executive officer will continue to receive base salary and benefits. We have also entered into customary non-competition, confidentiality of information and ownership of inventions arrangements with our executive officers. However, the enforceability of the noncompetition provisions may be limited under applicable law.
Options
Since our inception we have granted options to purchase our ordinary shares to our officers and certain of our directors. Such option agreements may contain acceleration provisions upon certain merger, acquisition, or change of control transactions.
Exculpation, Indemnification and Insurance
Our Articles of Association permit us to exculpate, indemnify and insure certain of our office holders to the fullest extent permitted by the Israel Companies Law. We have entered into indemnification agreements with our office holders, exculpating them from a breach of their duty of care to us to the fullest extent permitted by law and undertaking to indemnify them to the fullest extent permitted by law, subject to certain exceptions, including with respect to liabilities resulting from our IPO to the extent that these liabilities are not covered by insurance.
Consulting Agreement and Supplement Agreement with Randel E. Richner
At our 2022 annual meeting of shareholders, our shareholders approved the terms of a Consulting Agreement with Richner Consultants LLC, a Delaware company (the “Consultant”) owned by Randel E. Richner, a member of our Board. Pursuant to the Consulting Agreement, the Consultant provided us with the following services during 2022: strategic advisory consultation on activities related to CMS, including reviewing Company submissions to CMS; reviewing the Company’s dossier submitted to third-party insurers; coordinating and establishing lobbying efforts for the Company with U.S. government agencies; review and support with respect to reimbursements from private payers and with on-going interactions with the U.S. Veterans Benefits Administration; and other reimbursement-related matters as designated and agreed to with our CEO, including international reimbursement activities as needed. The services to be provided under the Consulting Agreement by the Consultant were provided solely by Ms. Richner.
The services were provided on an hourly basis at a rate of $425 per hour, payable by us on a monthly basis subject to the Consultant providing monthly invoices for the review of both our Chairman of the Board and our CEO. Under the Consulting Agreement, the aggregate total number of consulting hours provided by the Consultant could not exceed 282 hours.
The initial term of the Consulting Agreement commenced January 1, 2022, and expired December 31, 2022. Approximately $119,850 was owed and paid to the Consultant for the initial term of the Consulting Agreement.
At our 2023 annual meeting of shareholders, our shareholders approved an extension of the Consulting Agreement until the earlier of December 31, 2023 or such time as we receive approval from CMS. The extension term of the Consulting Agreement commenced January 1, 2023, and expired December 31, 2023. Approximately $119,999 was owed and paid to the Consultant for the extension term of the Consulting Agreement.
However, because the process of receiving reimbursement approval from CMS was far more complex and time-consuming than was initially contemplated, Ms. Richner was required to invest far more time during each of 2022 and 2023 than the maximum number of 282 consulting hours for each of 2022 and 2023 provided by the Consulting Agreement, as amended. Ms. Richner also provided services during the first four months of 2024. In addition, as a result of expending so much time in providing her consulting services to us, Ms. Richner was not able to take on other, higher-paying consulting assignments. The actual number of additional hours invested by Ms. Richner during 2022 and 2023 in excess of the maximum number of 282 hours per year provided in the Consulting Agreement, at her then-hourly rate of $425, and the hours expended by Ms. Richner in 2024 (for which Ms. Richner and we agreed that the hourly rate should be $550 per hour, which better represented Ms. Richner’s then-new standard hourly rate), came to an aggregate of $297,000. At our 2024 annual meeting of shareholders, our shareholders approved compensating Ms. Richner for such excess hours in the form of equity compensation pursuant to an Amendment and Supplement Agreement among the Company, the Consultant and Ms. Richner (the “Supplement Agreement”), subject to approval by our shareholders of a new equity compensation plan. The Supplement Agreement provided for a grant of equity compensation to Ms. Richner (rather than to the Consultant) in the form of stock options to purchase our ordinary shares, to be issued in three tranches as follows:
• On November 10, 2024, options will be issued having an aggregate value of $120,000, calculated utilizing a Black-Scholes valuation model based on the closing price of our ordinary shares on such date, but in no event will we issue such options in 2024 to purchase more than 45,614 ordinary shares;
• On November 11, 2025, options will be issued having an aggregate value of $120,000, calculated utilizing a Black-Scholes valuation model based on the closing price of our ordinary shares on such date, but in no event will we issue such options in 2025 to purchase more than 45,614 ordinary shares; and
• On November 12, 2026, options will be issued having an aggregate amount of $57,000, calculated utilizing a Black-Scholes valuation model based on the closing price of our ordinary shares on such date, but in no event will we issue such options in 2026 to purchase more than 21,662 ordinary shares.
By way of example only, utilizing a Black-Scholes valuation of $2.35 per share underlying the options based on the closing price of our ordinary shares of $3.90 on July 15, 2024, the number of shares underlying the three grants of options to be made to Ms. Richner described above would have been 51,111, 51,111 and 10,668, respectively, but due to the caps described above on the number of shares that can underlie grants of options to Ms. Richner, the number of shares would be 45,614, 45,614 and 10,66 respectively.
The grant provided that each of the stock options will vest immediately upon issuance and will be exercisable for a term of seven years, whether or not Ms. Richner continues to serve as a member of the Board, the exercise price per share of the options will be the closing price of our ordinary shares used for purposes of the respective Black-Scholes valuation, and the stock options can be exercised on a net exercise basis. Finally, as long as Ms. Richner remains engaged by us as a member of the Board, her ability to engage in any transactions in relation to the ordinary shares underlying the stock options will be subject to our Insider Trading Policy.
As described above, as of the date of this annual report our shareholders have not approved a new equity incentive compensation plan.
Distribution Agreement with CorLife for which Michael Swinford Serves As CEOOn March 6, 2025, we announced an agreement in which CorLife will become the exclusive distributor for the ReWalk Personal Exoskeleton for individuals with workers’ compensation claims. Michael Swinford, a member of our Board, serves as the Chief Executive Officer of Numotion, the parent company of CorLife. Our Board of Directors reviewed the financial terms of the contract which were negotiated at arms-length and the transaction was approved by the Board.
Approval of Related Party Transactions Under Israeli Law
Disclosure of Personal Benefits or Other Interests of an Office Holder and Approval of Certain Transactions
The Israel Companies Law requires that an office holder promptly disclose to the board of directors any personal benefit or other interest that he or she may have, and all related material information or documents, concerning any existing or proposed transaction with the company. A personal benefit or other interest includes the individual’s own benefit or other interest and, in some cases, a personal benefit or other interest of such person’s relative or an entity in which such individual, or his or her relative, is a 5% or greater shareholder, director or general manager, or in which he or she has the right to appoint at least one director or the general manager, but does not include a personal benefit or other interest stemming only from ownership of our shares.
If an office holder has a personal benefit or other interest in a transaction, approval by the board of directors is required for the transaction. Once an office holder has disclosed his or her personal benefit or other interest in a transaction, the board of directors may approve an action by the office holder that would otherwise be deemed a breach of duty of loyalty. A company may not, however, approve a transaction or action unless it is in the best interests of the company, or if the office holder is not acting in good faith.
Special approval is required for an extraordinary transaction, which under the Israel Companies Law is defined as any of the following:
• a transaction other than in the ordinary course of business;
• a transaction that is not on market terms; or
• a transaction that may have a material impact on a company’s profitability, assets or liabilities.
An extraordinary transaction in which an office holder has a personal benefit or other interest requires approval first by the company’s audit committee and subsequently by the board of directors. The compensation of, or an undertaking to indemnify or insure, an office holder who is not a director requires approval first by the company’s compensation committee, then by the company’s board of directors and, if such compensation arrangement or an undertaking to indemnify or insure is inconsistent with the Company’s compensation policy or if the office holder is the Chief Executive Officer (apart from a number of specific exceptions), then such arrangement is subject to shareholder approval by a simple majority, which must also include at least a majority of the shares voted by all shareholders who are neither controlling shareholders nor have a personal benefit or other interest in such compensation arrangement (alternatively, in addition to a simple majority, the total number of shares voted against the compensation arrangement by non-controlling shareholders and shareholders who do not have a personal benefit or other interest in the arrangement may not exceed 2% of our outstanding shares). We refer to this as the “Special Approval for Compensation”. Arrangements regarding the compensation, indemnification or insurance of a director require the approval of the compensation committee, board of directors and shareholders by a simple majority, in that order, and under certain circumstances, a Special Approval for Compensation.
Generally, a person who has a personal benefit or other interest in a matter that is considered at a meeting of the board of directors or the audit committee may not be present at such a meeting or vote on that matter unless the chairman of the board of directors or the audit committee (as applicable) determines that he or she should be present in order to present the transaction that is subject to approval. If a majority of the members of the board of directors or the audit committee (as applicable) have a personal benefit or other interest in the approval of a transaction, then all directors may participate in discussions of the board of directors or the audit committee (as applicable) on such transaction and in the voting, but shareholder approval is also required for such transaction.
Disclosure of Personal Benefits or Other Interests of Controlling Shareholders and Approval of Certain Transactions
Pursuant to the Israel Companies Law, the disclosure requirements regarding personal benefits or other interests that apply to directors and executive officers also apply to a controlling shareholder of a public company. In this context, a controlling shareholder includes a shareholder who holds 25% or more of our outstanding shares if no other shareholder holds more than 50% of our outstanding shares. For this purpose, the holdings of all shareholders who have a personal benefit or other interest in the same transaction will be aggregated. The approval of the audit committee, the board of directors and the shareholders of the company, in that order, is required for (a) extraordinary transactions with a controlling shareholder or in which a controlling shareholder has a personal benefit or other interest, (b) our engagement with a controlling shareholder or his or her relative, directly or indirectly, for the provision of services to us, (c) the terms of engagement and compensation of a controlling shareholder or his or her relative who is not an office holder or (d) our employment of a controlling shareholder or his or her relative, other than as an office holder. In addition to shareholder approval by a simple majority, the transaction must be approved by a Special Majority.
To the extent that any such transaction with a controlling shareholder is for a period extending beyond three years, approval is required once every three years, unless, with respect to certain transactions, the audit committee determines that the duration of the transaction is reasonable under the circumstances.
Arrangements regarding the compensation, indemnification or insurance of a controlling shareholder in his or her capacity as an office holder require the approval of the compensation committee, board of directors and shareholders, in that order, by a Special Majority, and the terms must be consistent with our Compensation Policy.
Pursuant to regulations promulgated under the Israel Companies Law, certain transactions with a controlling shareholder or his or her relative, or with directors, that would otherwise require approval of our shareholders may be exempt from shareholder approval upon certain determinations of the audit committee and board of directors. Under these regulations, we must publish these determinations, and a shareholder holding at least 1% of our outstanding shares may, within 14 days of after publication, demand shareholder approval despite such determinations.

---

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES
ITEM 14 . PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
Principal Accounting Fees and Services
The following table sets forth, for each of the years indicated, the fees expensed by Kost Forer Gabbay & Kasierer, our independent registered public accounting firm, in each such year.
($ in thousands)
Audit Fees(1)
$
$
Audit-Related Fees(2)
$
$
-
Tax Fees(3)
$
$
All Other Fees(4)
$
$
Total:
$
$
(1) “Audit fees” include fees for services performed by our independent public accounting firm in connection with our annual audit for 2023 and 2024, fees related to the review of quarterly financial statements, fees related to the pro forma financial information and fees for consultation concerning financial accounting and reporting standards. Fees in 2023 also include services by our accounting firm for the audit of AlterG for the years 2021 and 2022 prior to our acquisition of AlterG in August 2023.
(2) “Audit-related fees” relate to assurance and associated services that are traditionally performed by an independent auditor, including accounting consultation and consultation concerning financial accounting, reporting standards and due diligence.
(3) “Tax fees” include fees for professional services rendered by our independent registered public accounting firm for tax compliance, transfer pricing and tax advice on actual or contemplated transactions.
(4) “All other fees” include fees for services rendered by our independent registered public accounting firm with respect to government incentives and other matters.
Audit Committee’s Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures
The audit committee has adopted a pre-approval policy for the engagement of our independent accountant to perform certain audit and non-audit services. Pursuant to this policy, which is designed to ensure that such engagements do not impair the independence of our auditors, the audit committee pre-approves annually a catalog of specific audit and non-audit services in the categories of audit service, audit-related service and tax services that may be performed by our independent accountants.
All engagements by us of the auditors for 2023 and 2024 were pre-approved by the audit committee.
PART IV

---

ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
(a)(1) Financial Statements.
The Consolidated Financial Statements filed as part of this annual report are identified in the Index to Consolidated Financial Statements on page hereto.
(a)(2) Financial Statement Schedules.
Financial Statement Schedules have been omitted because the information required to be set forth therein is not applicable or is shown in the financial statements or notes thereto.
(a)(3) Exhibits.
The exhibits listed in the Exhibit Index are filed, furnished, or incorporated by reference in this report.
EXHIBIT INDEX
2.1
Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of August 8, 2023, by and among Lifeward, Inc., Atlas Merger Sub, Inc., AlterG Inc. and Shareholder Representative Services LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on August 9, 2023). +
3.1
Sixth Amended and Restated Articles of Association of the Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on November 12, 2024).
4.1
Specimen share certificate (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s registration statement on Form/A (File No. 333-197344), filed with the SEC on August 20, 2014).
4.2
Description of the registrant’s securities registered pursuant to Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on February 24, 2022).
4.3
Warrant, dated December 30, 2015, between the Company and Kreos Capital V (Expert Fund) Limited (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on January 4, 2016).
4.4
First Amendment to Warrant to Purchase Shares between the Company and Kreos Capital V (Expert Fund) Limited, dated November 20, 2018 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on November 21, 2018).
4.5
Form of common warrant from February 2020 best efforts offering (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on February 10, 2020).
4.6
Form of placement agent warrant from February 2020 best efforts offering (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on February 10, 2020).
4.7
Form of purchaser warrant from July 2020 registered direct offering (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 6, 2020).
4.8
Form of placement agent agreement from July 2020 registered direct offering (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 6, 2020).
4.9
Form of purchaser warrant from December 2020 private placement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on December 8, 2020).
4.10
Form of placement agent warrant from December 2020 private placement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on December 8, 2020).
4.11
Form of purchaser warrant from February 2021 private placement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on February 25, 2021).
4.12
Form of placement agent warrant from February 2021 private placement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on February 25, 2021).
4.13
Form of ordinary warrant from September 2021 private placement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on September 29, 2021).
4.14
Form of placement agent warrant from September 2021 private placement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on September 29, 2021).
4.15 Form of pre-funded warrant from September 2021 private placement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on September 29, 2021).
4.16 Form of purchaser warrant from January 2025 registered direct offering and concurrent private placement of warrants (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K/A filed with the SEC on January 8, 2025).
4.17
Form of placement agent warrant from January 2025 registered direct offering and concurrent private placement of warrants (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K/A filed with the SEC on January 8, 2025).
10.1
Letter of Agreement, dated July 11, 2013, between the Company and Sanmina Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on February 18, 2021).*
10.2
License Agreement, dated May 16, 2016, between the Company and the President and Fellows of Harvard College (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on February 18, 2021).*
10.3
Form of indemnification agreement between the Company and each of its directors and executive officers (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 to the Company’s registration statement on Form/A (File No. 333-197344), filed with the SEC on August 20, 2014).**
10.4
2014 Incentive Compensation Plan, as amended (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the Company’s registration statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-239258), filed with the SEC on June 18, 2020).**
10.5
Executive Employment Agreement, dated as of January 17, 2011, between the Company and Larry Jasinski (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.16 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on February 29, 2016, as amended on May 6, 2016).**
10.6 Amendment No. 1 to the Executive Employment Agreement, dated as of September 23, 2020, by and between the Company and Larry Jasinski.**
10.7
2014 Incentive Compensation Plan Form of Option Award Agreement for employees and executives (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on February 29, 2016, as amended on May 6, 2016).**
10.8
2014 Incentive Compensation Plan Form of Restricted Share Unit Award Agreement for non-Israeli employees, and executives (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.19 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on February 29, 2016, as amended on May 6, 2016).**
10.9
2014 Incentive Compensation Plan Form of Restricted Share Unit Award Agreement for Israeli non-employee directors, employees and executives (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.20.1 to the Company’s registration statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-227852), filed with the SEC on October 15, 2018).**
10.10
2014 Incentive Compensation Plan Form of Restricted Share Unit Award Agreement between the Company and Jeffrey Dykan, as director (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.20.2 to the Company’s registration statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-227852), filed with the SEC on October 15, 2018).**
10.11
2014 Incentive Compensation Plan Prior Form of Restricted Share Unit Award Agreement for non-Israeli non-employee directors (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.20 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on February 29, 2016, as amended on May 6, 2016).**
10.12
2014 Incentive Compensation Plan New Form of Restricted Share Unit Award Agreement for non-Israeli non-employee directors (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.22 to the Company’s registration statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-227852), filed with the SEC on October 15, 2018).**
10.13
2014 Incentive Compensation Plan Prior Form of Option Award Agreement for Israeli non-employee directors (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.21 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on February 17, 2017, as amended on April 27, 2017).**
10.14
2014 Incentive Compensation Plan Prior Form of Option Award Agreement for non-Israeli non-employee directors (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.22 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on February 17, 2017, as amended on April 27, 2017).**
10.15
Amendment No. 1 to the Exclusive License Agreement and Amendment No. 2 to the Research Collaboration Agreement, dated April 1, 2018, between the Company and the President and Fellows of Harvard College (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on June 29, 2018).*
10.16
Employment Agreement, dated July 9, 2021, by and between the Company and Jeannine Lynch (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on November 10, 2021**.
10.17
Employment Agreement, dated September 2, 2022, by and between the Company and Michael A. Lawless (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on November 7, 2022).* **
10.18
Consulting Agreement, dated as of January 1, 2023), by and between the Company and Richner Consultants LLC (incorporated by reference to Appendix A to the Company’s Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A filed with the SEC on August 9, 2023).**
10.19
Lifeward Ltd. Compensation Policy for Executive Officers and Non-Executive Directors (incorporated by reference to Appendix B to the Company’s Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A filed with the SEC on August 9, 2023).**
10.20
Employment Agreement, dated as of August 11, 2023, by and between the Company and Charles Remsberg (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on November 14, 2023).**
10.21
Form of Restricted Share Unit Award (Inducement Award) for non-Israeli employees and executives (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on November 14, 2023).**
10.22
Employment and Relocation Agreement, dated as of July 17, 2024, by and between the Company and Almog Adar (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on August 14, 2024).
10.23 Manufacturing Services Agreement, dated as of October 3, 2024, by and between the Company and Cirtronics Corporation. *
19.1
Insider Trading Policy.***
21.1
List of subsidiaries of the Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 21.1 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on February 27, 2024).
23.1
Consent of Kost Forer Gabbay & Kasierer, a member of Ernst &Young Global, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.
31.1
Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002.***
31.2
Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002.***
32.1
Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002.***
32.2
Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002.***
97.1
Compensation Recovery Policy (incorporated by reference to Annex A to the Lifeward Ltd. Compensation Policy for Executive Officers and Non-Executive Directors filed herewith as Exhibit 10.18).
101.INS
XBRL Instance Document.
101.SCH
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.
101.PRE
XBRL Taxonomy Presentation Linkbase Document.
101.CAL
XBRL Taxonomy Calculation Linkbase Document.
101.LAB
XBRL Taxonomy Label Linkbase Document.
101.DEF
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.
+ Schedules have been omitted pursuant to Item 601(b)(2) of Regulation S-K.
* Certain identified information in the exhibit has been omitted because it is the type of information that (i) the Company customarily and actually treats as private and confidential, and (ii) is not material.
** Management contract or compensatory plan, contract or arrangement.
*** Furnished herewith.