EDGAR 10-K Filing

Company CIK: 1399529
Filing Year: 2021
Filename: 1399529_10-K_2021_0001399529-21-000042.json

---

ITEM 1. BUSINESS
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
Overview
Dicerna Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“we,” “us,” “our,” “the Company,” or “Dicerna”) is a biopharmaceutical company focused on discovering, developing, and commercializing medicines that are designed to leverage ribonucleic acid interference (“RNAi”) to silence selectively genes that cause or contribute to disease. Using our proprietary GalXC™ and GalXC-Plus™ RNAi technologies, Dicerna is committed to developing RNAi-based therapies with the potential to treat both rare and more prevalent diseases. By silencing disease-causing genes, Dicerna’s GalXC platform has the potential to address conditions that are difficult to treat with other modalities. Initially focused on disease-causing genes in the liver, Dicerna has continued to innovate and is exploring new applications of its RNAi technology with GalXC-Plus, which expands on the functionality and application of our flagship liver-based GalXC technology, yet has the potential to treat diseases across multiple therapeutic areas. In addition to our own pipeline of core discovery and clinical candidates, Dicerna has established collaborative relationships with some of the world’s leading pharmaceutical companies, including Novo Nordisk A/S (“Novo”), Roche, Eli Lilly and Company (“Lilly”), Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (together with its affiliates, “Alexion”), Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH (“BI”), and Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“Alnylam”). Between Dicerna and our collaborative partners, we currently have more than 20 active discovery, preclinical, or clinical programs focused on rare, cardiometabolic, viral, chronic liver, and complement-mediated diseases, as well as neurodegenerative diseases and pain.
Most of our drug discovery and development efforts are based on the therapeutic modality of RNAi, a highly potent, natural, and specific mechanism that can be directed to reduce expression of a target gene. In this naturally occurring biological process, a short, synthetic, double-stranded RNA duplex induces the enzymatic destruction of the messenger ribonucleic acid (“mRNA”) of a target gene that contains sequences complementary to one strand of a double-stranded RNA. Our approach is to design proprietary RNA molecules that have the potential to engage the enzyme Dicer and direct the endogenous cellular RNAi machinery to silence a specific therapeutic target gene. Our GalXC technology utilizes a proprietary N-acetyl-D-galactosamine (“GalNAc”)-mediated conjugate to cause the liver to efficiently internalize our synthetic RNA molecules. In contrast, our GalXC-Plus technology incorporates new chemistries and secondary structures to enable targeting of genes in tissues and cell types beyond the liver. Our current clinical programs utilize the GalXC technology. Our GalXC-Plus technology utilizes modified RNA structures and various fully-synthetic conjugated ligands to deliver to non-liver tissues and is used in a number of our preclinical programs. Due to the enzymatic nature of RNAi, a single GalXC or GalXC-Plus molecule incorporated into the RNAi machinery can direct the cleavage and silencing of hundreds or thousands of mRNAs from the targeted gene.
Strategy
We are committed to delivering transformative therapies based on our GalXC platform to patients with serious diseases, and currently our focus includes rare, cardiometabolic, viral, chronic liver, and complement-mediated diseases, as well as neurodegenerative diseases and pain. We and our collaborators have identified dozens of disease-associated genes with the potential to treat clinical indications in which an RNAi-based inhibitor may provide substantial benefit to patients.
The key elements of our strategy are as follows:
•Create new programs in disease indications with high unmet medical need. We intend to continue to use our proprietary GalXC and GalXC-Plus RNAi technologies to create new, high-value pharmaceutical programs. Our areas of primary focus are: (1) rare inherited diseases involving genes in the liver; (2) other therapeutic areas involving the expression of therapeutic gene targets in the liver such as chronic liver diseases, cardiometabolic diseases, and viral infectious diseases; and (3) leveraging our GalXC-Plus constructs to explore therapeutic gene targets in complement-mediated diseases, as well as diseases impacting the central nervous system (“CNS”), adipose cells, skeletal muscle, and other tissues.
•Validate our product candidates and our platform in clinical proof-of-concept studies. In September 2018, we declared attainment of clinical proof-of-concept for nedosiran, which is in clinical development for primary hyperoxaluria (“PH”) type 1 (“PH1”), PH type 2 (“PH2”), and PH type 3 (“PH3”). In November 2020, we announced clinical proof-of-concept data and are currently conducting a clinical study for RG6346 for chronic hepatitis B virus (“HBV”) infection. We are planning to initiate a Phase 2 trial of belcesiran (formerly DCR-A1AT) in patients with alpha-1 antitrypsin (“AAT”) deficiency-associated liver disease (“AATLD”) in the first half of 2021. Based on precedent in the RNAi field, we are optimistic that our preclinical studies, which showed significant knockdown (i.e., reduction in the expression) of target mRNA activity and disease biomarker activity, may translate into beneficial clinical results for current and future programs.
•Retain significant portions of the commercial rights for select disease programs. We seek to retain, subject to the evaluation of potential licensing opportunities as they may arise, full or substantial ownership stake and to invest internally in select programs, including diseases with focused patient populations, such as certain rare diseases. Our nedosiran and belcesiran programs represent opportunities that we believe carry a higher probability of success relative to other therapeutic platforms or modalities, with genetically and molecularly defined disease markers, high unmet medical need, and a focused number of centers of excellence to facilitate reaching these patients.
•Lead United States (“U.S.”) commercialization efforts for select programs. Subject to marketing approval, we intend to lead U.S. commercialization efforts for nedosiran internally. In order to expand our sales, marketing, and distribution capabilities beyond the U.S., we plan to out-license commercialization rights to nedosiran through a collaboration with a third party. Under our RG6346 collaboration with Roche, we have an option to co-fund the development of products under the agreement in exchange for high-twenties to mid-thirties royalty rates on net sales of products in the U.S. As part of our belcesiran collaboration agreement with Alnylam, Alnylam has the opportunity to opt in to commercialize belcesiran in countries outside the U.S. Should Alnylam exercise this option, they will pay us royalties related to those territories. We seek to retain all or a substantial portion of ownership of U.S. commercial rights to future pipeline programs in both rare and prevalent diseases.
•Enter into strategic collaborations with pharmaceutical companies with either GalXC or GalXC-Plus RNAi technologies for specific indications or therapeutic areas. For more complex diseases with multiple gene dysfunctions and/or larger patient populations, we plan to pursue collaborations that can provide the enhanced scale, resources, and commercial infrastructure required to maximize these prospects. Our collaborations with Roche, Novo, Lilly, Alexion, BI, and Alnylam exemplify this element of our strategy. We may establish collaborations with pharmaceutical companies across multiple programs or specific disease areas, either before or after clinical proof-of-concept, depending on the attractiveness of the opportunities. These collaborations have the potential to provide us with further validation of our RNAi technology platform, funding to advance our proprietary product candidates, or access to development, manufacturing, and commercial capabilities.
•Expand the reach of our RNAi technology to therapeutic targets beyond the liver. Using our GalXC-Plus technology, we are expanding to target diverse tissues and cell types outside the liver, including the CNS, muscle tissue, adipose tissue, tumors-associated immune cells, and other tissues. Our collaboration with Lilly includes joint research projects to develop new platform technologies for neurodegenerative diseases and chronic pain, as well as for a limited number of non-liver-based cardiometabolic diseases. We are also pursuing research internally to expand the reach of GalXC-Plus technology in other diverse tissues and are increasing our investment in this area.
•Leverage the experience and the expertise of our executive management team. To execute on our strategy, we have assembled an executive management team that has extensive experience in the biopharmaceutical industry. In addition, various members of our management team and our Board of Directors have contributed to the progress of pharmaceutical development and commercialization through their substantial involvement in companies such as Cephalon Inc., Genta Inc., GlaxoSmithKline plc, Shire plc, Pfizer Inc., Novartis International AG, Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, Biogen, Inc., Sirna Therapeutics, Inc. (“Sirna”), and other companies.
Development Approach
In choosing which development programs to advance internally, we apply the scientific, clinical, and commercial criteria listed below that we believe allow us to best leverage our RNAi platform and maximize value. We believe that our current development programs meet many or all of these criteria:
• Strength of therapeutic hypothesis. We seek to target genes where an RNAi approach to treatment is likely to have substantial benefit for the patient.
• Readily-identified patient population. We seek disease indications where patients can be identified readily by the presence of characteristic genetic mutations or other readily-accessible disease features. In the case of genetic diseases, these are heritable genetic mutations that can be identified with available routine genetic tests.
• Predictivity of biomarkers for early efficacy assessment. We seek these markers to allow us to determine in early stages of clinical development whether our molecules are likely to have the expected biological and clinical effects in patients.
• High unmet medical need. We seek to provide patients with significant benefit and alleviation of disease. The indications we choose to approach have high unmet medical need. The selection of these indications is intended to enable us to better access patients and qualify for pricing and reimbursement that justify our development efforts.
• Rapid development path to proof-of-concept or approval. We seek indications with the potential for rapid development to proof-of-concept or marketing approval in order to reach commercialization expeditiously and to help ensure our ability to finance development of our product candidates. When appropriate, we will seek orphan designation, fast track designation, Breakthrough Therapy Designation, as well as other expedited programs from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”), or similar designations or expedited programs from foreign regulatory authorities. A breakthrough therapy is a drug that is intended to treat a serious or life-threatening disease or condition for which preliminary clinical evidence indicates that the drug may demonstrate substantial improvement over existing therapies on one or more clinically significant endpoints, such as substantial treatment effects observed early in clinical development.
The Dicerna Pipeline
In choosing which development programs to advance internally, we apply the scientific, clinical, and commercial criteria that we believe allow us to best leverage our GalXC RNAi platform and maximize value. Using our GalXC RNAi technology, and applying the criteria of our development focus, we have created a pipeline of core liver-focused therapeutic programs for development by Dicerna. For opportunities that were not selected as a core program opportunity, we have sought partners to fund the discovery, and subsequently drive the development of, these non-core opportunities in exchange for upfront payments, milestone payments, royalties on product sales, and potentially other economic and operational arrangements. Our current collaborations with Novo, Lilly, Alexion, and BI resulted from this effort. For core programs targeting rare diseases, we intend to develop these programs internally through approval using GalXC and GalXC-Plus technologies, subject to collaborative opportunities that arise, such as our agreement with Alnylam. For core programs targeting larger populations, we may seek development partners, such as our collaboration with Roche on RG6346, under various economic and operational arrangements. Together, our core program pipeline and our pipeline of non-core collaborative programs constitute a broad and growing therapeutic pipeline that we believe may result in multiple valuable approved products based on our GalXC and GalXC-Plus technologies.
In addition to the programs listed in our pipeline, we are exploring a variety of potential programs involving gene targets in diverse tissues addressable with our GalXC and GalXC-Plus technologies. Some of these programs may be elevated in the future to be either a core program or a non-core collaborative program. Under our collaborations with Novo, Roche, and Lilly, our collaborators have rights to nominate additional programs for discovery by Dicerna and subsequent development by the nominating collaborator, which will become part of our non-core pipeline. In the case of our collaboration with Novo, we retain rights to opt in to deeper participation, including enhanced economic rights, at defined points in clinical development, for two programs nominated by Novo.
Our four current core GalXC development programs are: nedosiran for the treatment of PH, RG6346 for the treatment of HBV infection, belcesiran for the treatment of AATLD, and DCR-AUD for the treatment of alcohol use disorder (“AUD”).
We conduct clinical trials in various countries around the world, including the U.S. and other areas heavily impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. The current supply of our investigational medicines is sufficient to support ongoing and planned clinical trials. Based on current evaluations, our supply chain continues to appear intact to meet at least the next 12 months of clinical, nonclinical, and chemistry, manufacturing, and control (“CMC”) supply demands across all programs. We have undertaken efforts to mitigate potential future impacts to the supply chain by increasing our stock of critical starting materials required to meet our needs and our collaborative partners’ needs through 2021 and by identifying and engaging alternative suppliers. In 2020, there were delays related to several nedosiran PHYOX trials and the belcesiran clinical trial in healthy volunteers as a result of COVID-19. As a result, and based on the most recent updates from clinical sites impacted by COVID-19 and precautionary measures related to the pandemic, we regularly evaluate our expectations related to clinical development milestones.
The table below sets forth the stage of development of our various GalXC RNAi platform product candidates as of February 25, 2021:
RNAi and Our GalXC Platform
The RNAi Therapeutic Modality
Most of our drug discovery and development efforts are based on the therapeutic modality of RNAi. RNAi therapeutics represent a novel advance in drug development. Historically, the pharmaceutical industry had developed only small molecules or monoclonal antibodies to inhibit the activity of disease-associated proteins. While this approach is effective for many diseases, many proteins cannot be inhibited by either small molecules or antibodies. The unique advantage of RNAi is that, instead of targeting proteins, RNAi silences the genes themselves via the targeted destruction of the mRNAs made from the gene. Rather than seeking to inhibit a protein directly, the RNAi approach is to prevent its creation in the first place, thus impacting the disease state.
The GalXC RNAi Platform
Dicerna’s GalXC platform consists of our liver-targeted GalXC technology and our GalXC-Plus technology for tissues outside the liver. Each utilizes a set of proprietary double-stranded RNA structures capable of inducing RNAi and associated chemical modifications and additions to these structures that enhance their properties and help confer useful “drug-like” properties. Our RNAi-inducing RNA structures consist of two strands of RNA. One of these strands, called the guide strand, is complementary to the mRNA sequence of the gene one is seeking to inhibit. The other strand, called the passenger strand, includes sequences complementary to the guide strand, forming a double-stranded RNA duplex with it. In the case of our GalXC and GalXC-Plus technologies, additional sequences may be added to the passenger strand, including a four-base sequence, known as a tetraloop, which is designed to enhance stability and engineer out immunostimulatory activity and can serve as an attachment point for various chemical additions that can facilitate delivery to diverse tissues.
We believe our GalXC RNAi platform provides the following qualities and has advantages compared to other therapeutic modalities:
• Our GalXC molecules have been optimized for use in humans. For therapeutic use in humans, our GalXC platform molecules are optimized both with respect to base sequence and chemical modifications to increase stability and mask them from mechanisms that recognize foreign RNA, in order to avoid inducing immune system stimulation.
•Our GalXC technology enables subcutaneous dosing for delivery to the liver. The GalXC RNAi technology is designed to enable convenient subcutaneous delivery for our growing pipeline of liver-targeted RNAi programs. Our liver-targeted GalXC molecules are conjugated on the tetraloop structure to a simple sugar, GalNAc, that is specifically recognized by a receptor on the surface of hepatocytes. With the liver-targeted GalXC technology, a full human dose may be administered via a single subcutaneous injection. After injection, the GalXC molecules enter the bloodstream and are exposed to the hepatocytes expressing the GalNAc receptor. After binding to the receptor, the GalXC molecules are internalized by the hepatocyte, ultimately enabling the GalXC molecules to access the RNAi machinery inside the hepatocyte. Our liver-targeted GalXC molecules routinely achieve high potencies, with EC50 values in the liver (i.e., the amount of material required to silence a target gene by 50 percent) typically in the 0.1 to 1.0 milligram per kilogram body weight (mg/kg) range in in vivo studies in mice. We have routinely generated GalXC molecules of this potency within 30 days of doing the initial algorithmic gene sequence analysis, which allows us to quickly explore a large number of potential target genes when selecting programs for ourselves and with our collaborators.
• Our GalXC technologies are highly specific to the gene to which they are targeted. Due to the gene-sequence-based nature of how our GalXC molecules interact with their gene mRNA targets, facilitated by the RNAi pathway proteins inside the cell, we believe our GalXC molecules generally lack any direct effect on other gene targets. This specificity compares favorably to many small-molecule-based therapeutics, which may inhibit additional proteins beyond the intended protein target.
•Our GalXC molecules have a long duration of action. Our GalXC platform was designed to, and in the case of our liver-based GalXC technology, has demonstrated in clinical studies, a duration of action that supports infrequent dosing (e.g., dosing that is on a monthly, quarterly, or potentially an even less frequent basis).
•Our GalXC molecules have demonstrated a high therapeutic index. In both preclinical and clinical studies, our GalXC molecules have been shown to be generally well-tolerated, even at dose levels far exceeding the expected efficacious dose level. We believe this property may reduce the risk that our GalXC molecules have tolerability liabilities precluding further development.
•Our GalXC molecules can be manufactured by existing, standard methods. Our GalXC molecules consist of RNA oligonucleotides, which can be manufactured with well-understood chemistries on existing readily available equipment.
•Our GalXC RNAi therapies are fully reversible after cessation of treatment and can also be modulated by dose or intervals between administration, unlike gene therapy and gene editing.
GalXC RNAi Technology Targeted to the Liver
To target the liver, we conjugate the tetraloop region of our GalXC molecules to a simple sugar, GalNAc, that is specifically recognized by a receptor on the surface of liver hepatocytes. This leads to internalization, ultimately enabling the GalXC molecules to access the RNAi machinery inside the hepatocyte and deliver our targeted oligonucleotide to the RISC complex. Due to the efficiency of this process, a full human dose may be administered via a single subcutaneous injection.
GalXC-Plus RNAi Technology for Tissues Outside the Liver
For delivering to tissues outside the liver, we have continued to innovate our GalXC platform using modified structures, chemistries, and conjugated moieties. Referred to as GalXC-Plus, these proprietary technological advances extend our expertise in RNAi silencing to address new tissues and organs outside the liver, while retaining key pharmacological features from GalXC. In 2020, we presented preclinical data demonstrating the potential application of our GalXC-Plus technology to the CNS, skeletal muscle, and adipose tissue.
Research
We continue to advance our GalXC RNAi platform as it is applied to therapeutic targets expressed in hepatocytes using GalNAc conjugates for both our collaborative research and development programs and our internal liver-targeted programs. All existing Dicerna collaborative programs include one or more liver-targeted applications of the GalXC RNAi platform.
In addition, we are exploring applications of our GalXC-Plus RNAi technology against therapeutic gene targets expressed in tissues other than the liver, including targets expressed in the CNS, muscle tissue, adipose tissue, tumor-associated immune cells, and other tissues. We have achieved significant gene target knockdown in multiple cell types and regions of the CNS and these other tissues, in both rodents and nonhuman primates. These extrahepatic applications are based on proprietary modifications to our well-characterized, clinical-stage GalXC platform that enable extrahepatic delivery and pharmacological activity.
On August 6, 2020, we presented for the first time preclinical data related to our GalXC-Plus RNAi technology in CNS, skeletal muscle, and adipose tissues. Results from preclinical studies demonstrated consistent and durable CNS-wide target mRNA knockdown using novel constructs regardless of route of administration (intrathecal [IT] or intracisterna magna [ICM]), and reduction in target mRNA in skeletal muscle and adipose tissue using optimized chemistries, resulting in equivalent and potentially highly durable target knockdown regardless of dosing regimens.
Status of Dicerna Programs
Our four current core GalXC development programs are as follows:
Nedosiran for Primary Hyperoxaluria
Nedosiran is our lead investigational product candidate for the treatment of PH1, PH2, and PH3 and is derived from our GalXC platform technology. PH is a family of rare, life-threatening genetic liver disorders characterized by the overproduction of oxalate, a highly insoluble metabolic end-product that is eliminated from the body mainly by the kidneys. In patients with PH, the kidneys are unable to eliminate fully the large amount of oxalate that is produced. This accumulation of oxalate compromises the renal system, which may result in severe damage to the kidneys and other organs.
PH encompasses three genetically distinct, autosomal-recessive, inborn errors of glyoxylate metabolism characterized by the overproduction of oxalate. PH1, PH2, and PH3 are each characterized by a specific enzyme deficiency. PH1 is caused by a deficiency of glyoxylate-aminotransferase, PH2 is caused by a deficiency of glyoxylate reductase/hydroxypyruvate reductase, and PH3 is caused by a deficiency of 4-hydroxy-2-oxoglutarate aldolase. The last step in the production of oxalate in the liver involves the enzyme product of the LDHA gene, making LDHA silencing what we believe is an ideal approach to blocking oxalate over-production in PH1, PH2, and PH3. Our nedosiran product candidate is designed to block production of the lactate dehydrogenase enzyme by silencing the LDHA gene, which is the final common pathway of oxalate production in the liver.
As PH is characterized by overproduction of oxalate in the liver, patients with PH are predisposed to the development of recurrent urinary tract (urolithiasis) and kidney (nephrolithiasis) stones, composed of calcium oxalate crystals formed from the excess oxalate. Stone formation is accompanied by diffuse deposits of calcium oxalate in the kidneys (nephrocalcinosis) of some patients with PH, which produces tubular toxicity, inflammation, and renal damage. This injury is compounded by the effects of renal calculi-related obstruction, frequent superimposed infections, and damage due to procedures needed to relieve stone-related obstruction. Compromised renal function can eventually result in the accumulation of oxalate in a wide range of organs, including the skin, bones, eyes, and heart. In the most severe cases, symptoms start in the first year of life. A combined liver-kidney transplant may be undertaken to resolve PH1 or PH2, but it is an invasive solution with limited availability and high morbidity that requires lifelong immune suppression to prevent organ rejection. Based on the evaluation of genome sequence databases, there may be as many as 16,000 people with PH in the U.S. and major European countries.
Most patients are diagnosed with PH in childhood or early adulthood. A number of supportive therapies are used in an attempt to mitigate some effects of the disease, including hyperhydration of at least three liters of fluid per day per square meter of body-surface area (5 L/day for a 70-kg adult). These regimens can be problematic in infants and toddlers, necessitating placement of a gastrostomy tube to ensure adequate nighttime fluid administration. Affected patients are at considerable risk of serious renal complications during periods of increased fluid loss (e.g., fever, diarrhea/vomiting, or urinary tract infections) or when oral hydration is compromised (e.g., following surgical procedures). Oral potassium citrate administration multiple times daily is used to potentially alleviate crystallization and alkalinize the urine. In PH1, between 10-30% of patients are partially responsive (i.e., greater than a 30% reduction of urinary oxalate (“Uox”) excretion) to high daily administration of pyridoxine (vitamin B6), but rarely do these patients reach normal or near-normal oxalate levels. A new therapy developed by a competing biopharmaceutical company for the treatment of PH1 was approved by select regulatory authorities in late 2020; however, at present, no therapies are approved by regulatory authorities for the treatment of all three genetically known subtypes of PH.
For PH1 and PH2 patients with more advanced disease, dialysis up to seven days per week may be used in an attempt to remove stored and ongoing overproduction of oxalate. Many healthcare providers now consider liver transplantation approaches earlier in the disease course to minimize the risk of irreversible tissue damage. We believe this level of unmet need provides a strong rationale for our initial focus on the treatment of PH.
Dicerna has developed nedosiran as a once-monthly fixed-dose injection for the treatment of PH. This once-monthly formulation of nedosiran is designed to avoid the sudden oxalate spikes that could occur with less frequent administration or missed dosages, which could result in the formation of kidney stones and renal failure. To maximize patient convenience, we are developing pre-filled syringes to enable self-administration by most PH patients without the need for involvement of a healthcare provider for dosing.
In 2018, nedosiran received Orphan Drug Designation from the FDA, and the European Medicines Agency’s (“EMA”) Committee for Orphan Medicinal Products (“COMP”) designated nedosiran as an orphan medicinal product for the treatment of PH. In June 2020, the FDA granted rare pediatric disease designation for nedosiran. Under the FDA’s rare pediatric disease designation program, the FDA may grant a priority review voucher to a Sponsor who receives a product approval for a rare pediatric disease on or before September 30, 2026. Subject to FDA approval of nedosiran for the treatment of PH, we believe we would be eligible to receive a voucher that may be redeemed to receive priority review for a subsequent marketing application for a different product candidate or which could be sold or transferred.
The broader PHYOX™ clinical trial program is designed to evaluate nedosiran in PH1, PH2, and PH3 patients of all ages and stages of renal health. Data from PHYOX™1, PHYOX2, PHYOX4 clinical trials, the ongoing PHYOX3 open-label extension study, and Dicerna’s PHYOX-OBX natural history study of PH3 participants are expected to support the initial nedosiran New Drug Application (“NDA”) submission.
PHYOX1 Single-Ascending-Dose Study
Data from the complete PHYOX1 trial, a Phase 1 single-ascending-dose study of nedosiran in healthy volunteers and study participants with PH1 and PH2, showed that nedosiran was generally well-tolerated in healthy volunteers and PH participants, and no serious safety concerns were identified in this study. In addition, nedosiran administration was associated with normalization or near-normalization of Uox levels in 14 of 18 participants with PH1 or PH2 following a single dose. We define normal and near-normal Uox as below 0.46 mmol/1.73m2 BSA/24 hr and from 0.46 to 0.6 mmol/1.73m2 BSA/24 hr, respectively.
The primary objective of the study was to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of single-ascending doses of nedosiran. Nedosiran was generally well-tolerated based on data from 18 participants (15 adults and three adolescents [participants 13-16 years old]) with PH1 (n=15) or PH2 (n=3) and 25 adult healthy volunteers. Four participants had serious treatment-emergent adverse events (“TEAEs”) that were determined by the investigator to be unrelated to nedosiran treatment. A total of seven participants dosed with nedosiran experienced mild or moderate injection-site reactions (defined as occurring four hours or more after injection), all of which resolved without intervention in a mean of 25 hours. No clinically meaningful safety signals were observed, including no clinically significant liver function test abnormalities.
Secondary endpoints included the change in 24-hour Uox excretion from baseline, defined as the mean of two 24-hour collections during screening. With respect to efficacy data in PHYOX1, nedosiran was associated with a mean maximal reduction of 24-hour Uox of 48.8% (1.5 mg/kg), 68.5% (3.0 mg/kg), and 78.0% (6.0 mg/kg) in adult patients with PH1 or PH2 following single-dose administration.
PHYOX2 Multidose, Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Pivotal Trial
PHYOX2 is a multidose, double-blind, 2:1 randomized, placebo-controlled pivotal trial of nedosiran designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of nedosiran delivered as a once-monthly subcutaneous injection in participants six years of age and older who have PH1 or PH2. This global trial includes countries across North America, Europe, and other regions, including Japan, Australia, and New Zealand. The primary endpoint of the study is the percent change from baseline in area under the curve (“AUC”) of 24-hour Uox excretion between Days 90 and 180.
Full enrollment in the PHYOX2 trial was successfully completed in late 2020 and we anticipate the last patient to complete this study in the first half of 2021. We expect to report top-line results from the study in mid-2021.
PHYOX3 Long-Term, Multidose, Open-Label Extension Study
Following positive Phase 1 data from PHYOX1 in 2019, we received clearance to proceed with the pivotal trial (PHYOX2) and PHYOX3, a long-term, multidose, open-label, extension study of nedosiran in PH. Unlike the PHYOX2 trial, which requires screening and enrollment of new participants, patients are permitted to transition into the PHYOX3 trial from any previous nedosiran trial in which they have participated and completed.
The primary endpoint of PHYOX3 is to evaluate the impact of monthly nedosiran administration on the annual rate of decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate (“eGFR”), a measure of kidney function. The PHYOX3 trial will also evaluate the long-term effect of nedosiran on Uox excretion, new stone formation, progression of nephrocalcinosis, and the potential to enable the gradual decrease or elimination of patients’ supportive hyperhydration therapies.
In total, 16 participants from the completed PHYOX1 trial entered the PHYOX3 study. In October 2020, we presented an interim analysis of data on the 13 participants who had reached Day 180 and received six monthly doses.
Three participants included in the safety analysis were not included in the efficacy analysis, as they had not yet reached Day 180 at the time of the analysis. All 13 participants (10 with PH1 and three with PH2) receiving nedosiran achieved normal (12 of 13) or near-normal (one of 13) Uox excretion levels at one or more timepoints. Of these, all 10 (100%) of the participants with PH1, and two of the three (67%) participants with PH2, achieved normal Uox excretion levels at one or more visits, and 62% of all participants achieved normal Uox excretions on at least three consecutive visits, meeting protocol-defined eligibility for gradual reduction in fluid intake requirements. In this study, we define normal and near-normal Uox as below 0.46 mmol/1.73m2 BSA/24 hr and from 0.46 to 0.6 mmol/1.73m2 BSA/24 hr, respectively.
Nedosiran was generally well-tolerated, and no serious safety concerns were identified in this study as of this interim analysis. There were no treatment discontinuations or study withdrawals during the observation period. Two participants had serious TEAEs (pyelonephritis and nephrolithiasis) that were determined by the investigator to be unrelated to nedosiran treatment. The most common TEAEs were mild to moderate administration-site reactions.
Additional PHYOX Trials: PHYOX4, PHYOX7, PHYOX8, and PHYOX-OBX
Given the fluid nature of the COVID-19 pandemic and the evolving and extraordinary actions undertaken by clinical trial sites globally, we continue to evaluate our clinical plans related to nedosiran. At this time, the status of additional PHYOX trials is as follows:
•PHYOX4: Enrollment in a study of patients with PH3 began in January 2021 and the first patient was dosed in February 2021. We anticipate top-line results from the study mid-year 2021.
•PHYOX7: A study of PH1 and PH2 patients with severe renal impairment, including those in dialysis, is expected to begin in the first quarter of 2021.
•PHYOX8: An open-label study in PH1 and PH2 patients aged 0-5 years with relatively intact renal function is expected to begin in the second quarter of 2021.
•PHYOX-OBX: We initiated an observational study in the third quarter of 2020 in participants with PH3 to evaluate the association between Uox excretion and the rate of kidney stone formation. Enrollment of participants in this study is expected in the first quarter of 2021.
In discussions with the FDA, we received feedback indicating alignment on a path to the full approval of nedosiran for the treatment of PH1 and PH2 based on achievement of substantial reduction of Uox excretion in patients with PH1 and PH2 after nedosiran administration versus those administered placebo in the PHYOX2 pivotal trial. With this feedback, we believe we have a path to seek full approval for both PH1 and PH2 based on PHYOX2 results. We received Breakthrough Therapy Designation from the FDA for the development of nedosiran for the treatment of PH1 in July 2019. We plan to continue our dialogue with the FDA regarding endpoints for studies involving patients with PH3 as part of the PHYOX clinical development program for nedosiran. We anticipate submitting an NDA for nedosiran near the end of the third quarter of 2021.
RG6346 for Chronic Hepatitis B Virus Infection
Our GalXC product candidate for the treatment of chronic HBV infection, RG6346, is currently being tested in a Phase 1 clinical trial. In order to be optimally positioned to develop and commercialize RG6346 in combination with other novel drugs, we entered into a research collaboration and licensing agreement with Roche in October 2019. Under the terms of the agreement, we are leading the development of RG6346 through the current Phase 1 trial, and pending favorable results, Roche intends to further develop RG6346 with the overall goal of developing a combination regimen to achieve a functional cure of chronic HBV in combination with additional Roche product candidates. Roche will be responsible for initiating RG6346 in a Phase 2 combination trial, which is anticipated in the first quarter of 2021. The agreement also provides an option for the companies to collaborate in the discovery, development, and commercialization of oligonucleotide therapeutics intended for the treatment of chronic HBV.
HBV is the world’s most common serious liver infection and affects an estimated 292 million people worldwide. Chronic HBV is characterized by the presence of the hepatitis B surface antigen (“HBsAg”) for six months or more. Current therapies for HBV include nucleoside analogs (“NUCs”) and pegylated interferon regimens. Interferons are less effective at suppressing viral replication and are associated with several side effects. NUCs are relatively safe to use but usually require indefinite therapy that increases the risk of non-adherence. Furthermore, the vast majority of patients treated with these agents do not achieve an immunological cure of chronic HBV infection as defined by the sustained clearance of HBsAg and HBV deoxyribonucleic acid (“DNA”) suppression in patient blood or serum. The chance of achieving a long-term immunological cure may be significantly enhanced with the introduction of novel drugs, such as RG6346, designed to reduce intrahepatic and serum HBsAg, as well as HBV DNA. These novel drugs may potentially be used in combination with each other and existing therapies, such as NUCs.
The Phase 1 trial is a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study designed to evaluate the safety and tolerability of RG6346 in healthy volunteers and in patients with non-cirrhotic chronic HBV. Secondary objectives are to characterize the pharmacokinetic profile of RG6346 and to evaluate preliminary pharmacodynamic effects on markers of HBV antiviral efficacy, including reductions of HBsAg and HBV DNA levels in blood. The Phase 1 clinical trial is divided into three groups:
•Group A is a single-ascending-dose arm in which 30 healthy volunteers received a dose of RG6346.
•Group B is a single-dose arm in which eight participants with chronic HBV who are naïve to NUC therapy received a 3.0 mg/kg dose of RG6346 or placebo.
•Group C is a multiple-ascending-dose arm in which RG6346 (1.5, 3.0, or 6.0 mg/kg) or placebo was administered to 18 participants with chronic HBV who are already being treated with NUCs.
Participants in Groups B and C were eligible to enter an extended follow-up observation period if they achieved an HBsAg reduction from baseline of ≥1.0 log10 IU/mL at the end of the treatment period (12 weeks/85 days for Group B; 16 weeks/112 days for Group C). Enrollment for the originally planned cohorts was completed in June 2020. Dosing in the 6.0 mg/kg dose group was completed; however, extended follow-up observation remains ongoing for a number of Group C participants.
In agreement with Roche, we are enrolling two additional, optional, open-label Group C cohorts, Cohort 4C and Cohort 5C, for which Roche will reimburse us. Cohorts 4C and 5C will evaluate fixed dosing regimens and an extended conditional follow-up period. Cohort 4C is a single-dose cohort with a follow-up duration of up to 48 weeks. Cohort 5C is a multiple-dose cohort with a follow-up duration of up to 72 weeks.
In November 2020, we expanded upon the interim results from both Group B and Group C presented in August 2020. In particular, top-line data from the Group C cohort demonstrated that four monthly doses of RG6346 treatment resulted in substantial and durable reductions in biomarkers of HBV disease activity as measured by reductions in HBsAg levels lasting up to one year following the last dose. RG6346 was also shown to have a favorable tolerability profile in the trial.
No significant adverse events (“SAEs”) were reported for participants treated with RG6346, and there were no dose-limiting toxicities or safety-related discontinuations. The most commonly reported adverse events were mild or moderate injection-site events. There were no dose-exposure or regimen-dependent increases in frequency or severity of adverse events, safety lab values, electrocardiogram readings, or vital signs.
In April 2020, Roche nominated the first of up to five targets under the research and development portion of our collaboration agreement.
Belcesiran (DCR-A1AT) for Alpha-1 Antitrypsin Deficiency-Associated Liver Disease
Our GalXC product candidate for the treatment of AATLD, belcesiran, is currently being tested in a Phase 1 clinical study. Alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency (“AATD”) is a rare, genetic, inherited condition that can lead to AATLD in children and adults and lung disease in adults. The condition is caused by mutations in the SERPINA1 gene. In people with AATLD, the liver produces an abnormal version of the AAT protein, which is prone to aggregation in the liver. This accumulation of mutated AAT in the liver can lead to liver disease. Individuals with AATLD also have an increased risk of having lung disease.
Research suggests that people who have the pair of gene variants called “ZZ” are most commonly identified as having AATLD. Recent epidemiology research indicates that approximately 120,000 individuals in Europe and 63,000 individuals in the U.S. carry this ZZ genotype; the genotype occurs more/most frequently in individuals of Northern European descent. Although most individuals with this pair will not develop liver disease, some will. Recent research indicates that the current diagnosis rate for AATLD in individuals with the ZZ genotype is approximately 10%, but that liver disease may remain under-diagnosed. AATLD can affect infants, children, and adults. Liver transplantation is currently the only effective treatment for AATLD.
In March 2020, the FDA granted orphan drug designation to belcesiran for the treatment of AATD. In December 2019, the European Commission granted orphan drug designation to belcesiran for the treatment of congenital AATD based on a positive opinion from the COMP of the EMA.
Our Phase 1 trial of belcesiran is an ongoing placebo-controlled study designed to evaluate the safety and tolerability of single doses of belcesiran when administered to healthy adult participants. Secondary objectives of the trial are to characterize the pharmacokinetic profile of belcesiran and to evaluate the preliminary pharmacodynamic effects on serum AAT protein concentrations.
Following our business update in March 2020, further enrollment of healthy volunteers in the ongoing trial of belcesiran in healthy volunteers was temporarily paused due to site restrictions related to the COVID-19 pandemic. Additional safety precautions were implemented, including testing of any participants presenting with symptoms consistent with COVID-19, and enrollment resumed in May 2020 after the Scientific Review Committee for the trial confirmed that the study could continue. We expect to advance belcesiran into Phase 2 development in the first half of 2021 and we expect to present data from the Phase 1 trial in healthy volunteers in 2021.
In April 2020, we entered into a collaboration agreement with Alnylam. Under the collaboration agreement, Alnylam’s ALN-AAT02 and Dicerna’s belcesiran would be explored for the treatment of AATLD at our cost, and we had the option to progress one or both of these investigational medicines through clinical development. We selected belcesiran to advance in development for the treatment of patients with AATLD.
At the completion of Phase 3, Alnylam has the no-cost opportunity to opt in to commercialize belcesiran in countries outside the U.S. where it already has a commercialization infrastructure in place (the “Commercialization Option”). If Alnylam exercises its Commercialization Option, the parties will share future development costs. Further, each party will pay tiered royalties to the other party based on a percentage of net product sales generated in its territory ranging from low single-digits to high teens. In the event Alnylam waives its Commercialization Option, we will retain worldwide rights to commercialize belcesiran in exchange for payments upon the satisfaction of certain milestones, up to an aggregate of $45.0 million, and royalties will be payable to Alnylam based on net product sales in the low to mid-single-digits. The A1AT Agreement is subject to customary termination provisions, and we may terminate the A1AT Agreement at any time without cause following the notice period described in the A1AT Agreement.
DCR-AUD for Alcohol Use Disorder
We are currently pursuing development of DCR-AUD for the treatment of AUD. DCR-AUD is an investigational therapy based on Dicerna’s GalXC technology for the treatment of AUD. DCR-AUD specifically knocks down ALDH2 gene expression in the liver, which plays a key role in alcohol metabolism. Inhibition of ALDH2 may help individuals with AUD avoid harmful levels of alcohol use.
AUD is a chronic condition characterized by compulsive alcohol use, loss of control over alcohol use, and a negative emotional state when not using alcohol. A range of medical, psychological, social, economic, and personal problems are associated with AUD. It is estimated that 14 million adults in the U.S. are living with AUD. With nearly 100,000 deaths annually, it is one of the leading preventable causes of death in the U.S.
Our goal is to submit an Investigational New Drug (“IND”) or Clinical Trial Application (“CTA”) filing in mid-2021 and initiate a subsequent Phase 1 single-ascending-dose trial in healthy volunteers in the third quarter of 2021.
Non-core Partner Development Programs
Novo Collaboration
On November 15, 2019, we entered into a Collaboration and License Agreement with Novo (the “Novo Collaboration Agreement”). Under the terms of the Novo Collaboration Agreement, we and Novo will seek to use GalXC to explore more than 30 gene targets associated with liver disease with the goal of delivering multiple clinical candidates for disorders including chronic liver disease, non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (“NASH”), type 2 diabetes, obesity, and rare diseases. We will conduct and fund discovery and preclinical development to clinical candidate selection for each liver cell target. Novo will be responsible for all further development and commercialization of each candidate selected for development, with Dicerna manufacturing clinical candidates selected for Phase 1-related clinical development, subject to reimbursement for its manufacturing costs. In addition, we will assist Novo with the IND filing for the first development candidate. We also retain the ability to opt in to co-development of a total of two programs during clinical development in Phases 1-3, subject to limitations in the event of a change in control. If we exercise a co-development option, we also have an option to co-promote the product in the United States, subject to limitations in the event of a change in control of the Company. Additionally, we may lead the development and commercialization of two programs targeting orphan liver diseases, with Novo retaining the ability to opt in to both programs in Phases 1-3. We and Novo will share in profits and losses for the Company’s orphan liver and Novo products should both parties elect to co-develop.
We are working exclusively with Novo during the research collaboration period on the discovery, research, development, and commercialization of hepatocyte targets subject to certain exclusions including those targets subject to our existing partnerships and Novo is, during a specified discovery period, working exclusively with us in any new research and development of compounds and products directed to collaboration targets using small interfering RNA (“siRNA”) conjugated to the sugar GalNAc to reduce the expression of specific target genes in the liver. Under the Novo Collaboration Agreement, we are providing Novo with exclusive and non-exclusive licenses and manufacturing support to enable Novo to commercialize products derived from or containing compounds developed pursuant to such agreement.
Under the terms of the Novo Collaboration Agreement, Novo paid us a non-refundable upfront payment of $175.0 million, subject to delivery of target information, in January 2020. We are also eligible to receive an additional $75.0 million ($25.0 million at the end of each of the first three years of the Novo Collaboration Agreement), contingent upon us delivering GalXC molecules for a defined number of targets, and additional payments totaling up to approximately $357.5 million per target upon achievement of specified development, regulatory, and commercial milestones. In addition, Novo will pay us mid-single-digits to mid-teens royalties on product sales on a country-by-country and product-by-product basis until the later of 10 years after the date of first commercial sale of each product in such country, expiration of specified patent rights in such country, or the expiration of specified regulatory exclusivity in such country for GalXC products, subject to royalty step-down provisions set forth in the agreement.
In connection with the Novo Collaboration Agreement, we and Novo entered into a share purchase agreement on November 15, 2019, pursuant to which we agreed to issue to Novo 2,279,982 shares of our common stock for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $50.0 million.
During the fourth quarter of 2020, Novo nominated its first candidate under the Novo Collaboration Agreement. In conjunction with the nomination of the first development candidate, Dicerna earned a $2.5 million milestone, which was received in February 2021. Also during the fourth quarter of 2020, Novo confirmed that Dicerna met its obligation to deliver GalXC molecules for a defined number of targets for the first year of the Novo Collaboration Agreement, entitling us to a $25.0 million payment. This payment was received in February 2021.
Roche Collaboration
As part of the terms of our collaboration agreement with Roche mentioned above, Roche had until receipt of interim Phase 1 data from the RG6346 Phase 1 study (but no later than December 31, 2020) to initiate a research and development collaboration with us to pursue up to five targets selected by Roche, which are intended primarily to treat HBV. Under an amendment to the collaboration agreement with Roche, in June 2020, we and Roche agreed to extend the date for nomination of targets from December 31, 2020 to January 15, 2021, subject to further potential extension by the parties due to the COVID-19 global pandemic shutdowns. Under the terms of the Roche Collaboration Agreement, the goal of such research and development collaboration will be to select compounds developed by us or Roche for Roche’s continued development and commercialization. Ours and Roche’s research and early development organizations will work exclusively with each other during the research and development collaboration period on the discovery, research, and development of such targets selected by Roche, which includes our performance of certain services. In April 2020, Roche nominated the first of up to five targets under the research and development portion of the Roche Collaboration Agreement.
Under the terms of the collaboration agreement with Roche, Roche paid us a non-refundable upfront payment of $200.0 million in January 2020. We are also eligible to receive additional payments totaling up to approximately $1.5 billion, which includes payments upon achievement of specified development, regulatory, and commercial milestones. In addition, Roche will pay us up to mid-teens percent royalties on worldwide product sales. Royalties are payable until the later of 10 years after first commercial sale of each product in a country, expiration of patent rights in a country, or for products containing RG6346 in a given country, the expiration of data or regulatory exclusivity, subject to certain royalty step-down provisions set forth in the agreement. In addition, we have an option to co-fund the development of products including RG6346 under the agreement and, if exercised, receive high-twenties to mid-thirties royalty rates on net sales of products in the U.S. If we exercise the co-funding option, we also have an option to co-promote products containing RG6346 in the U.S.
Lilly Collaboration
On October 25, 2018, we entered into a Collaboration and License Agreement with Lilly (the “Lilly Collaboration Agreement”) for the discovery, development, and commercialization of potential new medicines in the areas of cardiometabolic disease, neurodegenerative diseases, and pain. Under the terms of the Lilly Collaboration Agreement, we and Lilly will use our proprietary GalXC RNAi technology to progress new drug targets toward clinical development and commercialization. In addition, we will collaborate with Lilly on non-liver (i.e., extrahepatic) tissues, including neural tissues.
We will work exclusively with Lilly in the neurodegenerative disease and pain fields with the exception of mutually agreed upon orphan indications. Additionally, we will work exclusively with Lilly on select targets in the cardiometabolic field. Under the Lilly Collaboration Agreement, we will provide Lilly with exclusive and non-exclusive licenses to support the companies’ activities and to enable Lilly to commercialize products derived from or containing compounds developed pursuant to such agreement. The Lilly Collaboration Agreement provides for three initially named hepatocyte targets, and we and Lilly developed research programs with the goal of researching and developing multiple lead candidates directed to each of these initial targets. The Lilly Collaboration Agreement contemplates in excess of ten targets.
Lilly paid us a non-refundable upfront payment of $100.0 million. We are also eligible to receive up to $350.0 million per target in development and commercialization milestones, in addition to a $5.0 million payment, which will become due for each of the extrahepatic targets when a product candidate achieves proof of principle in an animal model. In addition, we are eligible to earn mid-single- to low-double-digit royalties on product sales on a country-by-country and product-by-product basis until the later of expiration of patent rights in a country, the expiration of data or regulatory exclusivity in such country, or 10 years after the first product sale in such country, subject to certain royalty step-down provisions set forth in the agreement.
Simultaneously with the entry into the Lilly Collaboration Agreement, we and Lilly entered into a share purchase agreement, pursuant to which Lilly purchased 5,414,185 shares of our common stock for an aggregate purchase price of $100.0 million.
During the first quarter of 2020, Lilly selected LY3819469, a GalXC molecule for the second collaboration target in cardiometabolic disease that targets the LPA gene, for advancement into preclinical development. We expect Lilly to file an IND for LY3819469 in the second quarter of 2021. Another GalXC molecule, LY3849889, is currently in preclinical development, and we expect Lilly to file an IND for LY3849889 in the first quarter of 2022.
Lilly filed an IND and initiated a Phase 1 study of LY3561774, a GalXC molecule for the first collaboration target in cardiometabolic disease that targets the ANGPTL3 gene for the treatment of dyslipidemia, in the fourth quarter of 2020. As a result of this filing, we achieved a milestone associated with the first filing of an IND with the FDA, entitling us to a $10.0 million payment.
In February 2021, Lilly notified us of their decision to extend for an additional year the initial research collaboration term for the extrahepatic targets subject to the Lilly Collaboration Agreement. Under the agreement between the companies, Lilly has the option to extend the three-year initial research collaboration term for these extrahepatic targets for up to three consecutive one-year periods. This first extension allows the research program for these extrahepatic targets under the collaboration between the two companies to continue through October 2022.
Alexion Collaboration
On October 22, 2018, we entered into a Collaborative Research and License Agreement (the “Alexion Collaboration Agreement”) with Alexion for the joint discovery and development of RNAi therapies for complement-mediated diseases. We will collaborate with Alexion on the discovery and development of two subcutaneously delivered GalXC candidates, currently in preclinical development, for the treatment of complement-mediated diseases with potential global commercialization by Alexion. We will lead the joint discovery and research efforts through the preclinical stage, and Alexion will lead development efforts beginning with Phase 1 studies. We will be responsible for manufacturing of the GalXC candidates for use through the completion of Phase 1, and certain related costs will be paid by Alexion. Alexion will be solely responsible for the manufacturing of any product candidate subsequent to the completion of Phase 1. The Alexion Collaboration Agreement provides Alexion with exclusive worldwide licenses as well as development and commercial rights to the GalXC RNAi molecules developed in the collaboration in exchange for development and approval-related milestones, sales milestones, and royalties on future product sales.
Alexion paid us a non-refundable upfront payment of $22.0 million. The Alexion Collaboration Agreement also provides for potential additional payments to us of up to $600.0 million from proceeds from target option exercises and development and sales milestones, as defined in the agreement, which includes (i) option exercise fees of up to $20.0 million, representing $10.0 million for each of the targets selected; (ii) development milestones of up to $105.0 million for each product; and (iii) aggregate sales milestones of up to $160.0 million. Alexion also agreed to pay us mid-single- to low-double-digit royalties on potential product sales on a country-by-country, product-by-product basis until the later of the expiration of patent rights in a country, the expiration of market or regulatory exclusivity in such country, or 10 years after the first product sale in such country, subject to certain royalty step-down provisions set forth in the agreement.
Simultaneously with the entry into the Alexion Collaboration Agreement, we and Alexion entered into a share purchase agreement, pursuant to which Alexion purchased 835,834 shares of our common stock for an aggregate purchase price of $15.0 million.
In November 2019, the Company and Alexion amended the Alexion Collaboration Agreement to clarify funding of certain manufacturing costs for each of the two initial targets and increased milestone payments for the additional targets if Alexion exercised its options for the two additional targets.
In December 2019, Alexion exercised its options for the exclusive rights to two additional targets within the complement pathway for the discovery and development of GalXC molecules. These exercises expanded the companies’ existing research collaboration and license agreement to encompass four targets within the complement pathway. In connection with the option exercises, Alexion paid Dicerna a total of $20.0 million, or $10.0 million in option exercise fees per additional new target that will be recognized into revenue as the related services are performed.
Two GalXC molecules targeted for complement-mediated indications are currently in preclinical development under the Alexion Collaboration Agreement. We expect to supply an IND-supporting package for DCR-COMP1, which targets the C3 gene, in the fourth quarter of 2021. We expect to supply an IND-supporting package related to DCR-COMP2, which targets the CFB gene, in the first quarter of 2022. While we anticipate delivery of the packages subject to our contractual obligations regarding these two candidates by the given dates, the decision of if and when to make IND/CTA filings is completely within Alexion’s discretion.
BI Collaboration
On October 27, 2017, we entered into a collaborative research and license agreement with BI (the “BI Agreement”), pursuant to which we and BI jointly research and develop product candidates for the treatment of chronic liver disease using GalXC. The BI Agreement is for the development of product candidates against one target gene with an option for BI to add the development of product candidates that target a second gene (the “Second Target”). Pursuant to the BI Agreement, we granted BI a worldwide license in connection with the research and development of such candidates and transferred certain intellectual property rights of the selected product candidates to BI for clinical development and commercialization. We also may provide assistance to BI in order to help BI further develop selected product candidates.
BI paid us a non-refundable upfront payment of $10.0 million for the first target. BI also agreed to reimburse Dicerna certain third-party expenses of $0.3 million. We are eligible to receive up to $191.0 million in potential development and commercial milestones related to the initial target. We are also eligible to receive royalty payments on potential global net sales, subject to certain adjustments, tiered from high single-digits up to low double-digits. Milestone payments that are contingent upon our performance under the BI Agreement include potential developmental milestones totaling $99.0 million. Potential net sales milestones total $95.0 million. BI’s Second Target option provided for an option fee payment of $5.0 million and success-based development and commercialization milestones and royalty payments to Dicerna.
In October 2018, BI exercised its Second Target option, which entitled the Company to a non-refundable payment of $5.0 million and reimbursement of $0.7 million for certain third-party expenses. The terms of the Second Target option exercise and related rights and obligations associated with the Second Target were agreed to in an Additional Target Agreement (the “ATA”), which was entered into on December 31, 2018. Under the terms of the ATA, BI is responsible for future clinical development and commercialization of candidate products for the Second Target. We are eligible to receive up to $170.0 million in potential development and commercial milestones related to the Second Target. We are also eligible to receive tiered royalty payments on potential global net sales, subject to certain adjustments, in the mid-single digits. Except as otherwise set forth in the ATA, development of the Second Target is subject to the terms of the original BI Agreement.
In addition to establishing the terms of the Second Target option exercise, the ATA also amends the BI Agreement to provide the parties with the opportunity to consider the development of product candidates targeting a further additional target gene (the “Third Target” option).
Cross-License Program
Alnylam
In addition to the collaboration agreement noted above, in April 2020, we and Alnylam (collectively, the “parties”) entered into a Patent Cross License Agreement (the “PH Agreement”). Pursuant to the PH Agreement, the parties completed a cross-license of their respective intellectual property for Alnylam’s lumasiran and Dicerna’s nedosiran investigational programs for the treatment of PH. No upfront cash consideration was exchanged in either the PH Agreement or the collaboration agreement.
Pursuant to the PH Agreement, the parties granted to each other a perpetual non-exclusive cross-license to their respective intellectual property related to their respective PH treatment investigational programs to ensure that each party has the freedom to develop and commercialize its respective product with Alnylam’s lumasiran targeting glycolate oxidase (“GO”) for the treatment of PH1 and our nedosiran targeting lactate dehydrogenase A (“LDHA”) for the treatment of PH1, PH2, and PH3. Each party will have sole discretion concerning the research and development of its products in the field. In exchange for the license, Alnylam is required to pay mid- to high-single-digit royalties to us based on global net sales of lumasiran and we are required to pay low-single-digit royalties to Alnylam on global net sales of nedosiran.
Intellectual Property
We are seeking multifaceted and multi-layered protection for our intellectual property on a global level that includes licenses, confidentiality and non-disclosure agreements, copyrights, patents, trademarks, and trade secrets. We enter into confidentiality and proprietary rights agreements with our employees, consultants, collaborators, subcontractors, and other third parties and generally seek to control access to our documentation and proprietary information as well as ownership to nascent intellectual property.
Patents and proprietary rights
We own U.S. patents and pending patent applications with claims to methods and compositions of matter that cover various aspects of our RNAi technology and our discovery technologies, including our proprietary GalXC technology and the newly developed GalXC-Plus technology. These U.S. patents include the following platform patents that protect our ability to make our structures: U.S. 8,349,809 (issued in January 2013, with a projected expiration date of January 2030); U.S. 10,131,912 (issued in November 2018, with a projected expiration date of January 2030); U.S. 8,513,207 (issued in August 2013, with a projected expiration date of May 2030); and U.S. 8,927,705 (issued in January 2015, with a projected expiration date of July 2030). These patents are from the same family of patents and constitute the core patents for our GalXC technology. We also own numerous patents and patent applications covering other elements of our platform technology, as well as patents to specific RNAi sequences that drive activity against a substantial number of high-value disease targets, including targets for our disclosed core and non-core programs. We have issued or pending claims to RNAi molecules, pharmaceutical compositions/formulations, methods of use, including in vitro and in vivo methods of reducing target gene expression, methods of treatment, methods of inhibiting cell growth, and methods of synthesis.
Our strategy around protection of our proprietary technology, including any innovations and improvements, is to obtain patent coverage in various jurisdictions around the world with a focus on jurisdictions that represent significant global pharmaceutical markets. Generally, patents have a term of 20 years from the earliest non-provisional priority date, assuming that all maintenance fees are paid, no portion of the patent has been terminally disclaimed, and the patent in question has not been invalidated by a court with proper jurisdiction. In certain jurisdictions, and in certain circumstances, patent terms can be extended or shortened. We are obtaining worldwide patent protection for novel molecules, composition of matter, pharmaceutical formulations, methods of use, including treatment of disease, methods of manufacture, and other novel uses for the inventive molecules originating from our research and development efforts, and other things. We continuously assess whether it is strategically more favorable to maintain confidentiality for the “know-how” regarding a novel invention or the trade secrets that may be inherent in a given process or method rather than pursue patent protection. For each patent application that is filed, we strategically tailor our claims in accordance with the existing patent landscape around a particular patentable matter.
We cannot predict with any certainty if any third-party U.S. or foreign patent rights, or other proprietary rights, will be deemed infringed by the use of our technology, nor can we predict with certainty which, if any, of these rights will or may be asserted against us by third parties. Should we need to defend ourselves and our collaborators against any such claims, substantial costs may be incurred. Furthermore, parties making such claims may be able to obtain injunctive or other equitable relief, which could effectively block our ability to develop or commercialize some or all of our products in the U.S. and abroad and could result in the award of substantial damages. In the event of a claim of infringement, we or our collaborators may be required to obtain one or more licenses from a third party. There can be no assurance that we can obtain a license on a reasonable basis should we deem it necessary to obtain rights to an alternative technology that meets our needs. The failure to obtain a license may have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, and financial condition.
We also rely on trade secret protection for our confidential and proprietary information. No assurance can be given that we can meaningfully protect our trade secrets on a continuing basis. Others may independently develop substantially equivalent confidential and proprietary information or otherwise gain access to our trade secrets.
It is our policy to require our employees and consultants, outside scientific collaborators, sponsored researchers, and other advisors who receive confidential information from us, to execute confidentiality agreements upon the commencement of employment or consulting relationships. These agreements provide that all confidential information developed or made known to these individuals during the course of the individual’s relationship with us is to be kept confidential and is not to be disclosed to third parties except in specific circumstances. The agreements provide that all inventions conceived by an employee shall be our property, except that employees are permitted to invent in unrelated fields during non-work hours, and such inventions would not be our property. There can be no assurance, however, that these agreements will provide meaningful protection or adequate remedies for our trade secrets in the event of unauthorized use or disclosure of such information.
See Item 1A - “Risk Factors - Risks Related to Intellectual Property” for a more detailed discussion of the risks to our intellectual property.
Competition
To our knowledge, there are no companies other than ourselves and our collaborators developing GalXC or GalXC-Plus molecules for therapeutic use. We believe that our scientific knowledge and expertise in RNAi-based therapies provide us with competitive advantages over the various companies and other entities that are attempting to develop similar treatments. However, many of our competitors have significantly greater financial resources and expertise in research and development, manufacturing, preclinical testing, conducting clinical trials, obtaining regulatory approvals, and marketing approved products than we do. Our competition can be grouped into three broad categories:
•Commercialized products and product candidates, as well as development programs that treat the same diseases for which we are also developing treatments. These companies include Oxthera AB, Allena Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Arbutus Biopharma, Vir Biotechnology, Inc., and Vertex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.;
•Other companies working to develop RNAi therapeutic products. These companies include Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Silence Therapeutics plc, Quark Pharmaceuticals, Inc., and Avidity Biosciences, Inc.; and
•Companies developing technology known as antisense, which, similar to the RNAi therapy we use, attempts to silence specific genes. These companies include Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Dyne Therapeutics, Inc., and Wave Life Sciences Ltd.
Our success will be based, in part, upon our ability to identify, develop, and manage a portfolio of drugs that offer competitive advantages such as improved safety, more convenient dosing, and greater efficacy than competing products for the treatment of our targeted patients. Our commercial opportunity could be reduced or eliminated if our competitors develop and commercialize products that are superior to the products we may develop.
Summarized below is information on perceived competition for our most advanced product candidates:
Primary Hyperoxaluria
We believe that the following product and product candidates in clinical development, if approved, could compete with nedosiran:
Company Drug Drug Description Phase
Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Oxlumo (lumasiran) RNAi therapeutic targeting glycolate oxidase specifically for the treatment of PH1 Approved/On the market
Oxthera AB Oxabact Bacteria intended to interact with the intestinal epithelial cells and promote secretion of oxalate from the body Phase 3
Allena Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Reloxaliase
(formerly ALLN-177) RNAi enzyme to reduce oxalate levels Phase 2
Biocodex, S.A. Stiripentol GABA reuptake inhibitor Phase 2
There are also other companies that have preclinical development programs for the potential treatment of PH.
Hepatitis B Virus
Many companies across the biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries are seeking improved treatments for chronic HBV infection. It is generally accepted that improved treatments will consist of combinations of therapeutic agents, acting via different mechanisms of action. We consider our competitors to be those developing potential treatments for chronic HBV that act via a similar mechanism of action as our RG6346 product candidate; specifically, potential treatments that block or lead to the destruction of the mRNA and pgRNA of HBV. It may be possible for others to develop an improved treatment for chronic HBV that does not include this mechanism of action.
We believe that the following product candidates in clinical development, if approved, could compete with RG6346:
Company Drug Drug Description Phase
Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Collaborative Partner: Vir Biotechnology
ALN-HBV02
VIR-2218 RNAi-GalNAc conjugate Phase 2
Arbutus Biopharma AB-729 RNAi-GalNAc conjugate Phase 1a/1b
Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Collaborative Partner: Janssen
JNJ-3989 RNAi-GalNAc conjugate Phase 2
Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Collaborative Partner: GlaxoSmithKline
IONIS-HBVRX
RNA-targeted antisense oligonucleotide Phase 2
There are also other companies that have preclinical development programs for the potential treatment of HBV.
Alpha-1 Antitrypsin Deficiency-Associated Liver Disease
Currently, there are no approved drugs to treat AATLD. We believe that the following product candidates in clinical development, if approved, could compete with belcesiran:
Company Drug Drug Description Phase
Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc. ARO-AAT RNAi-GalNAc conjugate Phase 2/3
Vertex Pharmaceuticals, Inc. VX-864 Oral small-molecule corrector of misfolded AAT protein Phase 2
There are also other companies that have preclinical development programs for the potential treatment of AATLD.
If our lead product candidates are approved for the indications for which we undertake clinical trials, they may compete with therapies that are either in development or currently marketed by our competitors. However, notwithstanding the availability of existing drugs or drug candidates, we believe sufficient unmet medical need exists to warrant the continuing advancement of our investigational RNAi therapeutic programs.
Alcohol Use Disorder
Currently, the only approved drugs to treat AUD are acamprosate calcium, disulfiram, oral naltrexone, and extended-release injectable naltrexone. Other companies across the biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries are seeking improved treatments for AUD. We consider our competitors to be those developing RNAi-based treatments for AUD that target liver expression of the ALDH2 gene, and we are not aware of any active development programs of this nature. It may be possible for other companies to develop an improved treatment for AUD that does not include this mechanism of action.
We believe that the following product candidates in clinical development, if approved, could compete with DCR-AUD:
Company Drug Drug Description Phase
Adial Pharmaceuticals, Inc. AD04 Ultra-low dose formulation of ondansetron; selective 5-HT3 receptor antagonist Phase 3
Amygdala Neurosciences, Inc. ANS-6637 Selective and reversible ALDH2 inhibitor
Phase 2
There are also other companies that have preclinical development programs for the potential treatment of AUD.
Sales and Marketing
Our current focus is on the development of our existing portfolio, the initiation and completion of clinical trials, and, where appropriate, the approval and marketing authorization of our product candidates. If we receive marketing and commercialization approval for any of our product candidates, we intend to market the product either directly or through strategic alliances and/or distribution agreements with third parties. The ultimate implementation of our strategy for realizing the financial value of our product candidates is dependent on the results of clinical trials for our product candidates, the availability of funds, our ability to obtain adequate coverage of and reimbursement for our products, compliance with laws governing our sales and marketing activities, and the ability to negotiate acceptable commercial terms with third parties.
Commercial readiness activities continue across the organization to ensure the timing of appropriate infrastructure, processes, and capabilities to support Dicerna’s evolution to a fully integrated biopharmaceutical company. The primary focus is on U.S. commercialization infrastructure for nedosiran and the Medical Affairs and Commercial teams that have been established. Additional infrastructure and commercialization activities are paced to the PHYOX programs and NDA preparations. Outside the U.S., active discussions for regional and/or multinational commercial collaboration partners are underway.
Manufacturing and Supply
We do not currently own or operate any manufacturing facilities for the production of preclinical, clinical, or commercial quantities of any of our product candidates. For each product candidate, we currently contract with third-party manufacturers and suppliers for certain drug materials, and we expect to continue to do so to meet the preclinical and clinical requirements of our product candidates.
In November 2019, we entered into an initial five-year agreement with a supplier for the development, manufacture, and supply of clinical and commercial product. In January 2020, we executed an amendment to this agreement which allows for advance preferential scheduling to the manufacturing line.
We typically order raw materials and services on a purchase order basis. We have not entered into long-term purchase commitments; however, from time to time, we make binding demand-based forecasts nine to 18 months ahead of planned supply requirements.
The current supply of our investigational medicines continues to be sufficient to support ongoing and planned clinical trials. Based on current evaluations, our supply chain continues to appear intact at this time and able to meet at least the next 12 months of clinical, nonclinical, and CMC supply demands across all programs. We have undertaken efforts to mitigate potential future impacts to the supply chain by increasing our stock of critical starting materials required to meet our needs and our collaborative partners’ needs through 2021 and by identifying and engaging alternative suppliers. We continue to be alert to the potential for disruptions that could arise from COVID-19 and remain in close contact with suppliers.
Manufacturing is subject to extensive regulations that impose various procedural and documentation requirements, which govern record-keeping, manufacturing processes and controls, personnel, quality control, and quality assurance, among others. Our contract manufacturing organizations manufacture our product candidates under current Good Manufacturing Practice (“cGMP”) conditions. cGMP is a regulatory standard for the production of pharmaceuticals that will be used in humans.
Government Regulation and Product Approval
Governmental authorities in the U.S., at the federal, state and local level, and other countries extensively regulate, among other things, the research, development, testing, manufacture, quality control, approval, labeling, packaging, promotion, storage, record-keeping, advertising, distribution, sampling, pricing, sales and marketing, safety, post-approval monitoring and reporting, and export and import of products such as those we are developing. Our product candidates must be approved by the FDA through the NDA process before they may be legally marketed in the U.S. and will be subject to similar requirements in other countries prior to marketing in those countries. The process of obtaining regulatory approvals and the subsequent compliance with applicable federal, state, local and foreign statutes and regulations require the expenditure of substantial time and financial resources and the extensive laws and regulations that apply to drug products and product candidates in the U.S. are subject to change.
U.S. government regulation
NDA approval processes
In the U.S., the FDA regulates drugs under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the “FDCA”) and implementing regulations. Failure to comply with the applicable U.S. requirements at any time during the product development or approval process, or after approval, may result in a delay of approval or subject an applicant to administrative or judicial sanctions, any of which could have a material adverse effect on us. These sanctions could include:
• refusal to approve pending applications;
• withdrawal of an approval;
• imposition of a clinical hold;
• issuance of warning or untitled letters;
• product recalls;
• product seizures;
• refusals of government contracts;
• total or partial suspension of production or distribution; or
• injunctions, fines, restitution, disgorgement, civil penalties or criminal prosecution.
The process required by the FDA before a drug may be marketed in the U.S. generally includes the following:
• completion of non-clinical laboratory tests, animal studies, and formulation studies conducted according to Good Laboratory Practices (“GLPs”) or other applicable laws and regulations;
• submission to the FDA of an IND, which must become effective before human clinical trials may begin;
• approval by an institutional review board (“IRB”) at each clinical site before each trial may be initiated;
• performance and inspection of adequate and well-controlled human clinical trials and clinical data according to FDA regulations and Good Clinical Practices (“GCP”) to establish the safety and efficacy of the product candidate for its intended use;
• submission of an NDA to the FDA and the FDA’s acceptance of the NDA for filing;
• satisfactory completion of an FDA inspection of the manufacturing facility or facilities at which the product candidate is produced to assess compliance with cGMP to assure that the facilities, methods, and controls are adequate to preserve the product candidate’s identity, strength, quality, and purity;
• satisfactory completion of an FDA inspection of the major investigational sites to ensure data integrity and assess compliance with GCP requirements; and
• FDA review and approval of the NDA.
Once a pharmaceutical candidate is identified for development, it enters the preclinical or non-clinical testing stage. Non-clinical tests include laboratory evaluations of product chemistry, stability, toxicity, and formulation, as well as animal studies. An IND sponsor must submit the results of the non-clinical tests, together with manufacturing information and analytical data, to the FDA as part of the IND. Some non-clinical testing may continue even after the IND is submitted. In addition to including the results of the non-clinical studies, manufacturing, and quality information, the IND will also include a protocol detailing, among other things, the objectives of the clinical trial, the parameters to be used in monitoring safety and the effectiveness criteria to be evaluated if the first phase lends itself to an efficacy determination. The IND automatically becomes effective 30 days after receipt by the FDA, unless the FDA, within the 30-day time period, places the IND on clinical hold. In such a case, the IND sponsor and the FDA must resolve any outstanding concerns before clinical trials can begin. A clinical hold may occur at any time during the life of an IND and may affect one or more specific studies or all studies conducted under the IND.
All clinical trials must be conducted under the supervision of one or more qualified investigators in accordance with FDA regulations and GCP. They must be conducted under protocols detailing the objectives of the trial, dosing procedures, research subject selection and exclusion criteria and the safety and effectiveness criteria to be evaluated. Each protocol and protocol amendments must be submitted to the FDA as part of the IND, and progress reports detailing the status of the clinical trials must be submitted to the FDA annually. Sponsors also must timely report to the FDA serious and unexpected adverse reactions, any clinically important increase in the rate of a serious suspected adverse reaction over that listed in the protocol or investigation brochure or any findings from other studies or animal or in vitro testing that suggest a significant risk in humans exposed to the drug. All research subjects or their legally authorized representatives must provide their informed consent in writing prior to their participation in a clinical trial. An IRB at each institution participating in the clinical trial must review and approve the protocol and the informed consent form before a clinical trial commences at that institution, monitor the study until completed and otherwise comply with IRB regulations. Information about most clinical trials must be submitted within specific timeframes to the National Institutes of Health (“NIH”) to be publicly posted on the ClinicalTrials.gov website.
Human clinical trials are typically conducted in three sequential phases that may overlap or be combined.
• Phase 1 - The product candidate is initially introduced into healthy human subjects and tested for safety, dosage tolerance, absorption, metabolism, distribution, and elimination. In the case of some product candidates for severe or life-threatening diseases, such as cancer, especially when the product candidate may be inherently too toxic to ethically administer to healthy volunteers, the initial human testing is often conducted in patients.
• Phase 2 - Clinical trials are performed on a limited patient population intended to identify possible adverse effects and safety risks, to preliminarily evaluate the efficacy of the product for specific targeted diseases and to determine dosage tolerance and optimal dosage.
• Phase 3 - Clinical trials are undertaken to further evaluate dosage, clinical efficacy, and safety in an expanded patient population at geographically dispersed clinical study sites. These studies are intended to establish the overall risk-benefit ratio of the product and provide an adequate basis for product labeling.
Human clinical trials are inherently uncertain, and Phase 1, Phase 2, and Phase 3 testing may not be successfully completed. The FDA, the sponsor, or a data safety monitoring board, may suspend a clinical trial at any time for a variety of reasons, including a finding that the research subjects or patients are being exposed to an unacceptable health risk. Similarly, an IRB can suspend or terminate approval of a clinical trial at its institution if the clinical trial is not being conducted in accordance with the IRB’s requirements or if the product candidate has been associated with unexpected serious harm to patients.
During the development of a new product candidate, sponsors are given opportunities to meet with the FDA at certain points prior to the submission of an IND, at the end of Phase 2, and before an NDA is submitted. Meetings at other times may be requested. These meetings can provide an opportunity for the sponsor to share information about the data gathered to date and for the FDA to provide advice on the next phase of development. Sponsors typically use the meeting at the end of Phase 2 to discuss their Phase 2 clinical results and present their plans for the pivotal Phase 3 clinical trial that they believe will support the approval of an NDA. If a Phase 2 clinical trial is the subject of discussion at the end of Phase 2 meeting with the FDA, a sponsor may be able to request a Special Protocol Assessment, the purpose of which is to reach agreement with the FDA on the Phase 3 clinical trial protocol design and analysis that will form the primary basis of an efficacy claim. In the case of Breakthrough Therapy Designation, communication with the FDA may occur more frequently than as outlined above.
Concurrent with clinical trials, sponsors usually complete additional animal safety studies and also develop additional information about the chemistry and physical characteristics of the product candidate and finalize a process for manufacturing commercial quantities of the product candidate in accordance with cGMP requirements. The manufacturing process must be capable of consistently producing quality batches of the product candidate and the manufacturer must develop methods for testing the safety, identity, strength, purity, and quality of the product candidate. Additionally, appropriate packaging must be selected and tested and stability studies must be conducted to demonstrate that the product candidate does not undergo unacceptable deterioration over its proposed shelf-life. Before approving an NDA, the FDA will inspect the facility or facilities where the product is manufactured and tested and will not approve the product unless cGMP compliance is satisfactory. The FDA will also typically inspect one or more clinical sites to assure compliance with FDA regulations and GCP.
The results of product development, non-clinical studies and clinical trials, along with descriptions of the manufacturing process, analytical tests and other control mechanisms, proposed labeling and other relevant information are submitted to the FDA as part of an NDA requesting approval to market the product. The submission of an NDA is subject to the payment of user fees, but a waiver of such fees may be obtained under specified circumstances. The FDA reviews all NDAs submitted to ensure that they are sufficiently complete for substantive review before it accepts them for filing. It may request additional information rather than accept an NDA for filing. In this event, the NDA must be resubmitted with the additional information. The resubmitted application also is subject to review before the FDA accepts it for filing.
Once the submission is accepted for filing, the FDA begins an in-depth review. The FDA reviews an NDA to determine, among other things, whether a product is safe and effective for its intended use and whether its manufacturing is cGMP-compliant. The FDA typically requires that an NDA include data from two adequate and well-controlled clinical trials, but approval may be based upon a single adequate and well-controlled clinical trial in certain circumstances. The FDA may refuse to approve an NDA if the applicable regulatory criteria are not satisfied or may require additional clinical or other data. Even if such data are submitted, the FDA may ultimately decide that the NDA does not satisfy the criteria for approval. The FDA may refer the NDA to an advisory committee for review and recommendation as to whether the application should be approved and under what conditions. The FDA is not bound by the recommendation of an advisory committee, but it generally follows such recommendations.
If a product receives regulatory approval, the approval may be significantly limited to specific diseases and dosages or the indications for use may otherwise be limited, which could restrict the commercial value of the product. Further, the FDA may require that certain contraindications, warnings, or precautions be included in the product labeling. In addition, the FDA may condition approval on the completion of post approval studies. Such studies may involve clinical trials designed to further assess a product’s safety and effectiveness and may require testing and surveillance programs to monitor the safety of approved products that have been commercialized. If the FDA determines that it is necessary to ensure the safe use of the drug, the FDA may also condition approval on the implementation of a risk evaluation and mitigation strategy (“REMS”). The REMS could include medication guides, physician communication plans, or elements to assure safe use, such as restricted distribution methods, patient registries, or other risk minimization tools.
Expedited review and approval
The FDA has various programs, including Fast Track, priority review, breakthrough, and accelerated approval, which are intended to expedite or simplify the process for reviewing product candidates. Generally, product candidates that are eligible for these programs are those for serious or life-threatening conditions, those with the potential to address unmet medical needs and those that offer meaningful benefits over existing treatments. A sponsor can request application of these programs either alone or in combination with each other, depending on the circumstances. Even if a product candidate qualifies for one or more of these programs, the FDA may later decide that the product candidate no longer meets the conditions for qualification or that the time period for FDA review or approval will be shortened. None of the expedited approval programs change the NDA approval standard applied to a product.
New drugs are eligible for Fast Track status if they are intended to treat a serious or life-threatening disease or condition and demonstrate the potential to address unmet medical needs for the disease or condition. Fast Track status entitles such a drug to expedited review and frequent contact with the FDA review division. Unlike other expedited review programs, Fast Track designation allows the FDA to accept for review individual sections of the NDA on a rolling basis. The FDA may also grant a priority review designation to drugs that offer major advances in treatment or provide a treatment where no adequate therapy exists. A priority review means that the goal for the FDA to review an application is six months from filing of an NDA, rather than the standard review of ten months from filing under current Prescription Drug User Fee Act guidelines. Most products that are eligible for Fast Track designation are also likely to be considered appropriate to receive a priority review.
Drug products studied for their safety and effectiveness in treating serious or life-threatening diseases or conditions may receive accelerated approval upon a determination that the product has an effect on a surrogate endpoint that is reasonably likely to predict clinical benefit, or on a clinical endpoint that can be measured earlier than irreversible morbidity or mortality, that is reasonably likely to predict an effect on irreversible morbidity or mortality or other clinical benefit, taking into account the severity, rarity, or prevalence of the condition and the availability or lack of alternative treatments. As a condition of approval, the FDA typically requires that a sponsor of a product candidate receiving accelerated approval conduct post-approval clinical trials. As an additional condition of approval, the FDA currently requires pre-approval of all promotional materials, which could adversely impact the timing of the commercial launch of the product.
The FDA may expedite the approval of a designated breakthrough therapy, which is a drug that is intended to treat a serious or life-threatening disease or condition for which preliminary clinical evidence indicates that the drug may demonstrate substantial improvement over existing therapies on one or more clinically significant endpoints, such as substantial treatment effects observed early in clinical development. A sponsor may request that a drug be designated as a breakthrough therapy at any time during the clinical development of the product. If the FDA designates a drug as a breakthrough therapy, the FDA must take the appropriate steps to expedite the development and review of the application, which may include holding meetings with the sponsor and the review team throughout the development of the drug; providing timely advice to the sponsor regarding the development of the drug to ensure that the development program is as efficient as practicable; involving senior managers and experienced review staff, as appropriate, in a collaborative, cross-disciplinary review; and taking steps to ensure that the design of the clinical trials is as efficient as practicable.
In December 2016, the 21st Century Cures Act (“Cures Act”), was signed into law. The Cures Act included numerous provisions that may be relevant to our product candidates, including provisions designed to speed development of innovative and breakthrough therapies. The Cures Act amends the FDCA and the Public Health Service Act, to reauthorize and expand funding for the NIH and to authorize the FDA to increase spending on innovation projects. Central to the Cures Act are provisions that enhance and accelerate the FDA’s processes for reviewing and approving new drugs and supplements to approved NDAs. The Cures Act also includes a provision that requires certain manufacturers or distributors of an investigational drug to make their policies on the availability of certain expanded access programs publicly available. Because the Cures Act was enacted relatively recently and the FDA may take several years to develop these policies, it is difficult to know the full extent of how the Cures Act will affect our business.
Patent term restoration and marketing exclusivity
Depending upon the timing, duration and specifics of FDA approval of the use of our product candidates, some of our U.S. patents may be eligible for limited patent term extension under the Drug Price Competition and Patent Term Restoration Act of 1984, referred to as the Hatch-Waxman Act. The Hatch-Waxman Act permits a patent restoration term of up to five years as compensation for patent term lost during product development and the FDA regulatory review process. However, patent term restoration cannot extend the remaining term of a patent beyond a total of 14 years from the product candidate’s approval date. The patent term restoration period is generally one half of the time between the effective date of an IND and the submission date of an NDA, plus the time between the submission date of an NDA and the approval of that application. Only one patent applicable to an approved product candidate is eligible for the extension and the application for extension must be made prior to expiration of the patent. The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, in consultation with the FDA, reviews and approves the application for any patent term extension or restoration. In the future, we intend to apply for restorations of patent term for some of our currently owned or licensed patents to add patent life beyond their current expiration date, depending on the expected length of clinical trials and other factors involved in the submission of the relevant NDA.
Market exclusivity provisions under the FDCA also can delay the submission or the approval of certain applications. The FDCA provides a five-year period of non-patent marketing exclusivity within the U.S. to the first applicant to gain approval of an NDA for a new chemical entity. A product candidate is a new chemical entity if the FDA has not previously approved any other new product candidate containing the same active moiety, which is the molecule or ion responsible for the action of the product candidate substance. During the exclusivity period, the FDA may not accept for review an abbreviated new drug application (“ANDA”) or a 505(b)(2) NDA (i.e., an NDA that contains full safety and effectiveness reports but allows at least some of the information required for NDA approval to come from studies not conducted by or for the applicant) submitted by another company for another version of such product candidate where the applicant does not own or have a legal right of reference to all the data required for approval. However, an application may be submitted after four years if it contains a certification of patent invalidity or non-infringement. The FDCA also provides three years of marketing exclusivity for an NDA, 505(b)(2) NDA or supplement to an approved NDA if new clinical investigations, other than bioavailability studies, that were conducted or sponsored by the applicant are deemed by the FDA to be essential to the approval of the application, for example, for new indications, dosages or strengths of an existing product candidate. This three-year exclusivity covers only the conditions associated with the new clinical investigations and does not prohibit the FDA from approving ANDAs for product candidates containing the original active agent. Five-year and three-year exclusivity will not delay the submission or approval of a full NDA. However, an applicant submitting a full NDA would be required to conduct or obtain a right of reference to all of the preclinical studies and adequate and well-controlled clinical trials necessary to demonstrate safety and effectiveness.
Orphan drug designation
Under the Orphan Drug Act, the FDA may grant orphan drug designation to product candidates intended to treat a rare disease or condition, which is generally a disease or condition that affects fewer than 200,000 individuals in the U.S. or more than 200,000 individuals in the U.S. and for which there is no reasonable expectation that the cost of developing and making available in the U.S. a product candidate for this type of disease or condition will be recovered from sales in the U.S. for that product candidate. Orphan drug designation must be requested before submitting an NDA. After the FDA grants orphan drug designation, the identity of the therapeutic agent and its potential orphan use are disclosed publicly by the FDA. Orphan drug designation does not convey any advantage in or shorten the duration of the regulatory review and approval process.
If a product candidate that has orphan drug designation subsequently receives the first FDA approval for the disease for which it has such designation, the product candidate is entitled to orphan product exclusivity, which means that the FDA may not approve any other applications including a full NDA to market the same product candidate for the same indication, except in very limited circumstances, for seven years. Orphan drug exclusivity, however, could also block the approval of one of our product candidates for seven years if a competitor obtains approval of the same product candidate as defined by the FDA prior to us.
On August 8, 2017, the FDA Reauthorization Act of 2017 (“FDARA”) was enacted. FDARA, among other things, codified the FDA’s pre-existing regulatory interpretation, to require that a drug sponsor demonstrate the clinical superiority of an orphan drug that is otherwise the same as a previously approved drug for the same rare disease in order to receive orphan drug exclusivity. The new legislation reverses prior precedent holding that the Orphan Drug Act unambiguously requires that the FDA recognize the orphan exclusivity period regardless of a showing of clinical superiority. The FDA may further reevaluate the Orphan Drug Act, including the FDARA amendment, its regulations and policies. We do not know if, when, or how the FDA may change the orphan drug regulations and policies in the future, and it is uncertain how any changes might affect our business. Depending on what changes the FDA may make to its orphan drug regulations and policies, our business could be adversely impacted.
Pediatric exclusivity, pediatric use and rare pediatric disease priority review vouchers
Under the Best Pharmaceuticals for Children Act, certain product candidates may obtain an additional six months of exclusivity if the sponsor submits information requested in writing by the FDA (a “Written Request”) relating to the use of the active moiety of the product candidate in children. The FDA may not issue a Written Request for studies on unapproved or approved indications or where it determines that information relating to the use of a product candidate in a pediatric population, or part of the pediatric population, may not produce health benefits in that population.
FDARA amended the FDCA to provide that a drug, for which an application has been submitted or approved pursuant to section 505(b)(2) or 505(j) of the FDCA, will not be considered ineligible for approval or misbranded because the labeling of such drug omits a pediatric indication or other pediatric labeling information when the omitted pediatric information is protected by patent or marketing exclusivity. FDARA further permits FDA to require specific labeling for such products related to the omitted pediatric indication and information to, among other things, make clear that the omission of the information is related to the exclusivity. We do not know if or how such changes to the pediatric exclusivity provisions might affect our business.
In addition, the Pediatric Research Equity Act (“PREA”) requires a sponsor to conduct pediatric studies for most product candidates and biologics, for a new active ingredient, new indication, new dosage form, new dosing regimen or new route of administration. Under PREA, original NDAs, biologics license applications and supplements thereto must contain a pediatric assessment unless the sponsor has received a deferral or waiver. The required assessment must assess the safety and effectiveness of the product candidate for the claimed indications in all relevant pediatric subpopulations and support dosing and administration for each pediatric subpopulation for which the product candidate is safe and effective. The sponsor or the FDA may request a deferral of pediatric studies for some or all of the pediatric subpopulations. A deferral may be granted for several reasons, including a finding that the product candidate or biologic is ready for approval for use in adults before pediatric studies are complete or that additional safety or effectiveness data needs to be collected before the pediatric studies begin. After April 2013, the FDA must send a noncompliance letter to any sponsor that fails to submit the required assessment, keep a deferral current or fails to submit a request for approval of a pediatric formulation. PREA does not apply to any drug for an indication for which orphan designation has been granted. However, if only one indication for a product has orphan designation, a pediatric assessment may still be required for any applications to market that same product for the non-orphan indication(s).
Section 529 of the FDCA is intended to encourage development of new drug and biological products for prevention and treatment of certain rare pediatric diseases. Although there are existing incentive programs to encourage the development and study of drugs for rare diseases, pediatric populations, and unmet medical needs, section 529 provides an additional incentive for rare pediatric diseases, which may be used alone or in combination with other incentive programs. “Rare pediatric disease” is defined as a disease that:
• is “a serious or life-threatening disease in which the serious or life-threatening manifestations primarily affect individuals aged from birth to 18 years, including age groups often called neonates, infants, children, and adolescents”; and
• is “a rare disease or condition” as defined in the FDCA, which includes diseases and conditions that affect fewer than 200,000 persons in the U.S. and diseases and conditions that affect a larger number of persons and for which there is no reasonable expectation that the costs of developing and making available the drug in the U.S. can be recovered from sales of the drug in the U.S.
Under section 529, the sponsor of a human drug application for a rare pediatric disease drug product may be eligible for a voucher that can be used (or sold) to obtain a priority review for a subsequent human drug application submitted under section 505(b)(1) of the FDCA or section 351 of the Public Health Service Act after the date of approval of the rare pediatric disease drug product. The rare pediatric disease priority review vouchers program was most recently re-authorized by Congress in the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2021, extending the rare pediatric disease program through September 30, 2024, with the potential for priority review vouchers to be granted through September 30, 2026.
Post-approval requirements
Once an approval is granted, the FDA may withdraw the approval if compliance with regulatory requirements is not maintained or if problems occur after the product candidate reaches the market. Requirements for additional Phase 4 trials (post-approval marketing studies) to confirm safety and efficacy may be imposed as a condition of approval. Later discovery of previously unknown problems with a product candidate may result in REMS or even complete withdrawal of the product candidate from the market. After approval, some types of changes to the approved product candidate, such as adding new indications, manufacturing changes and additional labeling changes, are subject to further FDA review and approval. In addition, the FDA may require testing and surveillance programs to monitor the effect of approved product candidates that have been commercialized, and the FDA has the power to prevent or limit further marketing of a product candidate based on the results of these post-marketing programs.
Any product candidates manufactured or distributed by us pursuant to FDA approvals are subject to continuing regulation by the FDA, including, among other things:
• record-keeping requirements;
• reporting of adverse experiences with the product candidate;
• submission of periodic reports;
• providing the FDA with updated safety and efficacy information;
• drug sampling, stability and distribution requirements;
• notifying the FDA and gaining its approval of specified manufacturing or labeling changes; and
• complying with statutory and regulatory requirements for promotion and advertising.
Drug manufacturers and other entities involved in the manufacture and distribution of approved product candidates are required to register their establishments and provide product listing information to the FDA and certain state agencies and are subject to periodic unannounced inspections by the FDA and some state agencies for compliance with cGMP and other laws.
Regulation outside of the U.S.
In addition to regulations in the U.S., we will be subject to regulations of other jurisdictions governing any clinical trials and commercial sales and distribution of our product candidates. Whether or not we obtain FDA approval for a product, we must obtain approval by the comparable regulatory authorities of countries outside of the U.S. before we can commence clinical trials in such countries, and approval of the regulators of such countries or supranational areas, such as the European Union (“EU”), before we may market products in those countries or areas. The approval process and requirements governing the conduct of clinical trials, product licensing, pricing and reimbursement vary greatly from place to place, and the time may be longer or shorter than that required for FDA approval.
European Union clinical trials regulation
In the EU, a Clinical Trial Application (“CTA”) must be submitted for each clinical trial to each country’s National Competent Authority (“NCA”) and at least one independent Ethics Committee (“EC”) much like the FDA and an IRB, respectively. Once the CTA is approved in accordance with a country’s requirements, the corresponding clinical trial may proceed. Under the current regime (the EU Clinical Trials Directive 2001/20/EC and corresponding national laws) all suspected unexpected serious adverse reactions to the investigated drug that occur during the clinical trial have to be reported to the NCA and ECs of the Member State where they occurred.
In April 2014, the EU adopted a new Clinical Trials Regulation (EU) No 536/2014, which is set to replace the current Clinical Trials Directive 2001/20/EC and will overhaul the current system of approvals for clinical trials in the EU. Specifically, the new Regulation, which will be directly applicable in all Member States (meaning that no national implementing legislation in each EU Member State is required), aims at simplifying and streamlining the approval of clinical trials in the EU. For instance, the new Clinical Trials Regulation provides for a streamlined application procedure via a single entry point and strictly defined deadlines for the assessment of clinical trial applications. It is expected that the new Clinical Trials Regulation (EU) No 536/2014 will come into effect following confirmation of full functionality of the Clinical Trials Information System, the centralized EU portal and database for clinical trials foreseen by the new Clinical Trials Regulation, through an independent audit, which is currently expected to occur in December 2021.
Drug review and approval
To obtain a marketing authorization in the European Economic Area (“EEA”) (comprising the EU Member States, plus Norway, Iceland, and Liechtenstein), a company may submit marketing authorization applications either under a centralized procedure administered by the EMA or one of the procedures administered by competent authorities in the EEA Member States (decentralized procedure, national procedure, or mutual recognition procedure). The centralized procedure, compulsory for certain medicines, including those produced by biotechnology, products designated as orphan medicinal products, advanced therapy medicinal products, and those with a new active substance indicated for the treatment of HIV, AIDS, cancer, neurodegenerative disorders, autoimmune and other immune dysfunctions, viral diseases or diabetes and is optional for those medicines which contain a new active substance, or which are a significant therapeutic, scientific or technical innovation or whose authorization would be in the interest of public health. The centralized procedure provides for the grant of a single marketing authorization that is valid for all EEA Member States. Under the centralized procedure, the maximum timeframe for the evaluation of a marketing authorization application (“MAA”) by the EMA is 210 days, excluding clock stops, when additional written or oral information is to be provided by the applicant in response to questions asked by the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (“CHMP”). Clock stops may extend the timeframe of evaluation of a MAA considerably beyond 210 days. Where the CHMP gives a positive opinion, it provides the opinion together with supporting documentation to the European Commission, who makes the final decision to grant a marketing authorization, which is issued within 67 days of receipt of the EMA’s recommendation. Accelerated assessment might be granted by the CHMP in exceptional cases, when a medicinal product is expected to be of major public health interest, particularly from the point of view of therapeutic innovation. The timeframe for the evaluation of a MAA under the accelerated assessment procedure is 150 days, excluding clock stops, but it is possible that the CHMP may revert to the standard time limit for the centralized procedure if it determines that it is no longer appropriate to conduct an accelerated assessment.
Through the decentralized procedure, a medicinal product that has not yet been authorized in the EEA can be simultaneously authorized in several EEA Member States. The mutual recognition procedure provides for mutual recognition of national approval decisions. Under this procedure, the holder of a national marketing authorization may submit an application to the other EEA Member States. Within 90 days of receiving the applications and assessment reports, each Member State involved must decide whether to recognize the approval. If a Member State does not recognize the marketing authorization, the disputed points are eventually referred to the European Commission, whose decision is binding.
Now that the UK (which comprises Great Britain and Northern Ireland) has left the EU, Great Britain will no longer be covered by centralized marketing authorizations (under the Northern Irish Protocol, centralized marketing authorizations will continue to be recognized in Northern Ireland). All medicinal products with a current centralized marketing authorization were automatically converted to Great Britain marketing authorizations on January 1, 2021. For a period of two years from January 1, 2021, the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (“MHRA”), the UK medicines regulator, may rely on a decision taken by the European Commission on the approval of a new marketing authorization in the centralized procedure, in order to more quickly grant a new Great Britain marketing authorization. A separate application will, however, still be required.
Orphan drug designation and exclusivity
As in the U.S., we may apply for designation of a product candidate as an orphan drug for the treatment of a specific indication in the EEA before the application for marketing authorization is made. The criteria for designating an “orphan medicinal product” in the EEA are similar in principle to those in the United States. Under Article 3 of Regulation (EC) 141/2000, a medicinal product may be designated as an orphan medicinal product if it meets the following criteria: (1) is intended for the diagnosis, prevention, or treatment of a life-threatening or chronically debilitating condition; and (2) either the prevalence of such condition must not be more than five in 10,000 persons in the EEA when the application is made, or without the benefits derived from orphan status, it must be unlikely that the marketing of the medicine would generate sufficient return in the EEA to justify the investment needed for its development; and (3) there exists no satisfactory method of diagnosis, prevention, or treatment of such condition authorized for marketing in the EEA, or if such a method exists, the product will be of significant benefit to those affected by the condition, as defined in Regulation (EC) 847/2000. Sponsors of orphan drugs in the EU can enjoy economic and marketing benefits, including a reduction of fees or fee waivers and up to 10 years of market exclusivity for the approved indication. During such period of market exclusivity, marketing authorization applications for “similar medicinal products” will not be accepted, unless another applicant can show that its product is safer, more effective or otherwise clinically superior to the orphan-designated product, the marketing authorization holder consents to the second orphan medicinal product application, or where the marketing authorization holder cannot supply enough orphan medicinal product. In the EAA, a “similar medicinal product” is a medicinal product containing a similar active substance or substances as contained in a currently authorized orphan medicinal product, and which is intended for the same therapeutic indication. The 10-year market exclusivity may be reduced to six years if, at the end of the fifth year, it is established that the product no longer meets the criteria for orphan designation, for example, if the product is sufficiently profitable not to justify the maintenance of market exclusivity.
Brexit and the Regulatory Framework in the United Kingdom
In June 2016, the electorate in the UK voted in favor of leaving the EU (commonly referred to as “Brexit”). Thereafter, in March 2017, the country formally notified the EU of its intention to withdraw pursuant to Article 50 of the Lisbon Treaty. The UK formally left the EU on January 31, 2020. A transition period began on February 1, 2020, during which EU pharmaceutical law remained applicable to the UK. This transition period ended on December 31, 2020. Since the regulatory framework in the UK covering quality, safety, and efficacy of pharmaceutical products, clinical trials, marketing authorization, commercial sales, and distribution of pharmaceutical products is derived from EU Directives and Regulations, Brexit could materially impact the future regulatory regime which applies to products and the approval of product candidates in the UK, as UK legislation now has the potential to diverge from EU legislation. It remains to be seen how Brexit will impact regulatory requirements for product candidates and products in the UK in the long-term. The MHRA has recently published detailed guidance for industry and organizations to follow from January 1, 2021 now that the transition period is over, which will be updated as the UK’s regulatory position on medicinal products evolves over time.
Coverage and Reimbursement
In the U.S. and markets in other countries, patients who are prescribed treatments for their conditions and providers performing the prescribed services generally rely only on third-party payors to reimburse all or part of the associated healthcare costs. Thus, sales of our products will depend, in part, on the extent to which the costs of our products will be covered and paid for by third-party payors, such as Medicare, Medicaid, and other government health programs, commercial insurance and managed healthcare organizations. In the United States, no uniform policy of coverage and reimbursement for products exists among third-party payors. Therefore, coverage and reimbursement for products can differ significantly from payor to payor. The process for determining whether a third-party payor will provide coverage for a product may be separate from the process for setting the price or reimbursement rate that the payor will pay for the product once coverage is approved. Third-party payors may limit coverage to specific products on an approved list or formulary, which might not include all of the FDA-approved products for a particular indication. Also, third-party payors may refuse to include a particular branded drug on their formularies or otherwise restrict patient access to a branded drug when a less costly generic equivalent or another alternative is available. Third-party payors are increasingly challenging the prices charged for medical products and services, examining the medical necessity, and reviewing the cost-effectiveness of medical products and services and imposing controls to manage costs. Further, due to the COVID-19 pandemic, millions of individuals have lost or will be losing employer-based insurance coverage, which may adversely affect our ability to commercialize our products.
In order to secure coverage and reimbursement for any product that might be approved for sale, a company may need to conduct expensive pharmacoeconomic studies in order to demonstrate the medical necessity and cost-effectiveness of the product, in addition to the costs required to obtain FDA or other comparable regulatory approvals. Additionally, companies may also need to provide discounts to purchases, private health plans, or government healthcare programs. Nonetheless, products may not be considered medically necessary or cost effective. A decision by a third-party payor not to cover a product could reduce physician utilization once the product is approved and have a material adverse effect on our sales, results of operations, and financial condition. Additionally, a third-party payor’s decision to provide coverage for a product does not imply that an adequate reimbursement rate will be approved. Factors payors consider in determining reimbursement are based on whether the product is:
•a covered benefit under its health plan;
•safe, effective, and medically necessary;
•appropriate for the specific patient;
•cost-effective; and
•neither experimental nor investigational.
Further, one payor’s determination to provide coverage for a product does not assure that other payors will also provide coverage and reimbursement for the product, and the level of coverage and reimbursement can differ significantly from payor to payor.
Additionally, the containment of healthcare costs has become a priority of federal and state governments, and the prices of drugs have been a focus in this effort. The U.S. government, state legislatures and foreign governments have shown significant interest in implementing cost-containment programs, including price controls, restrictions on reimbursement and requirements for substitution of generic products. For example, the current U.S. administration has indicated support for possible new measures to regulate drug pricing. Adoption of price controls and cost-containment measures, and adoption of more restrictive policies in jurisdictions with existing controls and measures, could significantly limit our net revenue and financial results. If these third-party payors do not consider our products to be cost-effective compared to other therapies, they may not cover our products after approved as a benefit under their plans or, if they do, the level of payment may not be sufficient to allow us to sell our products on a profitable basis.
On July 24, 2020 and September 13, 2020, then-President Trump announced several executive orders related to prescription drug pricing that seek to implement several of the administration's proposals. In response, the FDA released a final rule on September 24, 2020, which went into effect on November 30, 2020, providing guidance for states to build and submit importation plans for drugs from Canada. Further, on November 20, 2020, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (“CMS”) issued an Interim Final Rule implementing the Most Favored Nation (“MFN”) Model under which Medicare Part B reimbursement rates will be calculated for certain drugs and biologicals based on the lowest price drug manufacturers receive in Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development countries with a similar gross domestic product per capita. The MFN Model regulations mandate participation by identified Part B providers and will apply in all U.S. states and territories for a seven-year period beginning January 1, 2021 and ending December 31, 2027. On December 28, 2020, a judge in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California granted a preliminary injunction prohibiting CMS from implementing the MFN rule.
At the state level, legislatures have increasingly passed legislation and implemented regulations designed to control pharmaceutical product pricing, including price or patient reimbursement constraints, discounts, restrictions on certain product access and marketing cost disclosure and transparency measures, and, in some cases, designed to encourage importation from other countries and bulk purchasing.
The Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003 (“MMA”) imposed new requirements for the distribution and pricing of prescription drugs for Medicare beneficiaries. Under Part D, Medicare beneficiaries may enroll in prescription drug plans offered by private entities which will provide coverage of outpatient prescription drugs. Part D plans include both stand-alone prescription drug benefit plans and prescription drug coverage as a supplement to Medicare Advantage plans. Unlike Medicare Part A and B, Part D coverage is not standardized. Part D prescription drug plan sponsors are not required to pay for all covered Part D drugs, and each drug plan can develop its own drug formulary that identifies which drugs it will cover and at what tier or level. However, Part D prescription drug formularies must include drugs within each therapeutic category and class of covered Part D drugs, though not necessarily all the drugs in each category or class. Any formulary used by a Part D prescription drug plan must be developed and reviewed by a pharmacy and therapeutic committee. Government payment for some of the costs of prescription drugs may increase demand for our products for which we receive marketing approval. However, any negotiated prices for our products covered by a Part D prescription drug plan will likely be lower than the prices we might otherwise obtain. Moreover, while the MMA applies only to drug benefits for Medicare beneficiaries, private payors often follow Medicare coverage policy and payment limitations in setting their own payment rates. Any reduction in payment that results from the MMA may result in a similar reduction in payments from non-governmental payors.
Healthcare Reform
In recent years, U.S. and foreign governmental authorities and other payors have attempted to control healthcare costs by limiting coverage and reimbursement for certain medical products. The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, as amended by the Health Care and Education Affordability Reconciliation Act of 2010, collectively referred to as the ACA, enacted in March 2010, has had a significant impact on the health care industry by, for example, expanding coverage for the uninsured and seeking to contain overall healthcare costs. Regarding pharmaceutical products, among other things, the ACA contains provisions of importance to our potential product candidates, including among other things, provisions that:
•created an annual, nondeductible fee on any entity that manufactures or imports specified branded prescription drugs and biologic products, apportioned among these entities according to their market share in certain government healthcare programs;
•expanded eligibility criteria for Medicaid programs by, among other things, allowing states to offer Medicaid coverage to certain individuals with income at or below 133% of the federal poverty level, thereby potentially increasing a manufacturer’s Medicaid rebate liability;
•expanded manufacturers’ rebate liability under the Medicaid Drug Rebate Program by increasing the minimum rebate for both branded and generic drugs and revising the definition of average manufacturer price (“AMP”) for calculating and reporting Medicaid drug rebates on outpatient prescription drug prices;
•addressed a new methodology by which rebates owed by manufacturers under the Medicaid Drug Rebate Program are calculated for drugs that are inhaled, infused, instilled, implanted, or injected;
•expanded the types of entities eligible for the 340B drug discount program;
•created new requirements to report financial arrangements with physicians and teaching hospitals, commonly referred to as the Physician Payments Sunshine Act;
•created a new requirement to annually report the identity and quantity of drug samples that manufacturers and authorized distributors of record provide to physicians; and
•created a new Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute to oversee, identify priorities in, and conduct comparative clinical effectiveness research, along with funding for such research.
Since its enactment, there have been numerous judicial, administrative, executive, and legislative challenges to certain aspects of the ACA, and we expect there will be additional challenges and amendments to the ACA in the future. Various portions of the ACA are currently undergoing legal and constitutional challenges in the United States Supreme Court; the Trump Administration issued various Executive Orders which eliminated cost sharing subsidies and various provisions that would impose a fiscal burden on states or a cost, fee, tax, penalty, or regulatory burden on individuals, healthcare providers, health insurers, or manufacturers of pharmaceuticals or medical devices; and Congress has introduced several pieces of legislation aimed at significantly revising or repealing the ACA. The United States Supreme Court is expected to rule on a legal challenge to the constitutionality of the ACA in early 2021. The implementation of the ACA is ongoing, the law appears likely to continue the downward pressure on pharmaceutical pricing, especially under the Medicare program, and may also increase our regulatory burdens and operating costs. Litigation and legislation related to the ACA are likely to continue, with unpredictable and uncertain results.
Both new legislative reforms, as well as actions taken by the Biden administration, could have an adverse effect on anticipated revenues from product candidates that we may successfully develop and for which we may obtain regulatory approval and may affect our overall financial condition and ability to develop product candidates.
Further legislation or regulation could be passed that could harm our business, financial condition, and results of operations. Other legislative changes have been proposed and adopted since the ACA was enacted. For example, in August 2011, then-President Obama signed into law the Budget Control Act of 2011, which, among other things, created the Joint Select Committee on Deficit Reduction to recommend to Congress proposals in spending reductions. The Joint Select Committee on Deficit Reduction did not achieve a targeted deficit reduction of at least $1.2 trillion for fiscal years 2012 through 2021, triggering the legislation’s automatic reduction to several government programs. This includes aggregate reductions to Medicare payments to providers of up to 2% per fiscal year, which went into effect beginning on April 1, 2013 and will stay in effect through 2030 unless additional Congressional action is taken. However, pursuant to the Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security Act (“CARES Act”) and subsequent legislation, these Medicare sequester reductions were suspended from May 1, 2020 through March 31, 2021 due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Proposed legislation, if passed, would extend this suspension until the end of the pandemic. In addition, on February 9, 2018, Congress passed the Bipartisan Budget Act that made several healthcare reforms. For example, the law changes the discounts manufacturers are required to apply to their drugs under the Coverage Gap Discount Program from 50% to 70% of the negotiated price starting in 2019. In addition, the law increases civil and criminal penalties for fraud and abuse laws, including, for example, increases in both criminal fines for violations of the Anti-Kickback Statute and corresponding prison sentences.
Also, there has been heightened governmental scrutiny recently over the manner in which drug manufacturers set prices for their marketed products, which have resulted in several Congressional inquiries and proposed bills designed to, among other things, bring more transparency to product pricing, reduce the cost of prescription drugs and biologics under Medicare, review the relationship between pricing and manufacturer patient programs, and reform government program reimbursement methodologies for drug products. For example, at the federal level, the Trump administration’s budget proposal for fiscal year 2021 included a $135.0 billion allowance to support legislative proposals seeking to reduce drug prices, increase competition, lower out-of-pocket drug costs for patients, and increase patient access to lower-cost generic and biosimilar drugs. On March 10, 2020, the Trump administration sent “principles” for drug pricing to Congress, calling for legislation that would, among other things, cap Medicare Part D beneficiary out-of-pocket pharmacy expenses, provide an option to cap Medicare Part D beneficiary monthly out-of-pocket expenses, and place limits on pharmaceutical price increases. Additionally, the Trump administration previously released a “Blueprint” to lower drug prices and reduce out-of-pocket costs of drugs that contained proposals to increase manufacturer competition, increase the negotiating power of certain federal healthcare programs, incentivize manufacturers to lower the list price of their products, and reduce the out-of-pocket costs of drug products paid by consumers. The Department of Health and Human Services (“HHS”) implemented several of these provisions to date. For example, in May 2019, CMS issued a final rule that would allow Medicare Advantage Plans the option of using step therapy, a type of prior authorization, for Part B drugs beginning January 1, 2020. Additionally, on November 20, 2020, HHS finalized a regulation removing safe harbor protection for price reductions from pharmaceutical manufacturers to plan sponsors under Part D, either directly or through pharmacy benefit managers, unless the price reduction is required by law. The rule also creates a new safe harbor for price reductions reflected at the point-of-sale, as well as a safe harbor for certain fixed fee arrangements between pharmacy benefit managers and manufacturers. Although a number of these and other proposed measures will require authorization through additional legislation to become effective, it is unclear whether the Biden administration will challenge, reverse, revoke, or otherwise modify these recent executive and administrative actions.
Individual states in the U.S. have also become increasingly active in passing legislation and implementing regulations designed to control pharmaceutical product pricing, including price or patient reimbursement constraints, discounts, restrictions on certain product access and marketing cost disclosure and transparency measures, and, in some cases, designed to encourage importation from other countries and bulk purchasing.
In addition, in some non-U.S. jurisdictions, the proposed pricing for a product candidate must be approved before it may be lawfully marketed. The requirements governing drug pricing vary widely from country to country. For example, the EU provides options for its member states to restrict the range of medicinal products for which their national health insurance systems provide reimbursement and to control the prices of medicinal products for human use. A member state may approve a specific price for the medicinal product or it may instead adopt a system of direct or indirect controls on the profitability of the company placing the medicinal product on the market. There can be no assurance that any country that has price controls and/or reimbursement limitations for pharmaceutical products will allow favorable reimbursement and pricing arrangements for any of our product candidates. Historically, product candidates launched in the EU do not follow price structures of the U.S. and generally tend to have price structures that are significantly lower.
Other Healthcare Fraud and Laws
In the U.S., our activities are potentially subject to regulation by various federal, state and local authorities in addition to the FDA, including but not limited to, CMS, other divisions of the HHS (such as the Office of Inspector General (“OIG”) and the Health Resources and Service Administration (“HRSA”)), the U.S. Department of Justice (the “DOJ”) and individual U.S. Attorney offices within the DOJ, and state and local governments. For example, sales, marketing and scientific/educational grant programs may have to comply with the anti-fraud and abuse provisions of the Social Security Act, the false claims laws, the privacy and security provisions of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (“HIPAA”) and similar state laws, each as amended, as applicable.
The federal Anti-Kickback Statute prohibits, among other things, any person or entity, from knowingly and willfully offering, paying, soliciting or receiving any remuneration, directly or indirectly, overtly or covertly, in cash or in kind, to induce or in return for purchasing, leasing, ordering or arranging for the purchase, lease or order of any item or service reimbursable, in whole or in part, under Medicare, Medicaid or other federal healthcare programs. The term remuneration has been interpreted broadly to include anything of value. The Anti-Kickback Statute has been interpreted to apply to arrangements between therapeutic product manufacturers on one hand and prescribers, purchasers, and formulary managers on the other. There are a number of statutory exceptions and regulatory safe harbors protecting some common activities from prosecution. The exceptions and safe harbors are drawn narrowly and practices that involve remuneration that may be alleged to be intended to induce prescribing, purchasing or recommending may be subject to scrutiny if they do not qualify for an exception or safe harbor. Failure to meet all of the requirements of a particular applicable statutory exception or regulatory safe harbor does not make the conduct per se illegal under the Anti-Kickback Statute. Instead, the legality of the arrangement will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis based on a cumulative review of all of its facts and circumstances. Additionally, the intent standard under the Anti-Kickback Statute was amended by the ACA to a stricter standard such that a person or entity no longer needs to have actual knowledge of the statute or specific intent to violate it in order to have committed a violation. In addition, the ACA codified case law that a claim including items or services resulting from a violation of the federal Anti-Kickback Statute constitutes a false or fraudulent claim for purposes of the federal False Claims Act (the “FCA”) (discussed below).
The federal false claims and civil monetary penalty laws, including the FCA, which imposes significant penalties and can be enforced by private citizens through civil qui tam actions, prohibit any person or entity from, among other things, knowingly presenting, or causing to be presented, a false or fraudulent claim for payment to, or approval by, the federal healthcare programs, including Medicare and Medicaid, or knowingly making, using, or causing to be made or used a false record or statement material to a false or fraudulent claim to the federal government. A claim includes “any request or demand” for money or property presented to the U.S. government. Manufacturers can be held liable under the FCA even when they do not submit claims directly to government payors if they are deemed to “cause” the submission of false or fraudulent claims.
HIPAA created additional federal criminal statutes that prohibit, among other things, knowingly and willfully executing, or attempting to execute, a scheme to defraud or to obtain, by means of false or fraudulent pretenses, representations or promises, any money or property owned by, or under the control or custody of, any healthcare benefit program, including private third-party payors, willfully obstructing a criminal investigation of a healthcare offense, and knowingly and willfully falsifying, concealing or covering up by trick, scheme or device, a material fact or making any materially false, fictitious or fraudulent statement in connection with the delivery of or payment for healthcare benefits, items or services. Like the Anti-Kickback Statute, the ACA amended the intent standard for certain healthcare fraud statutes under HIPAA such that a person or entity no longer needs to have actual knowledge of the statute or specific intent to violate it in order to have committed a violation.
Also, many states have similar, and typically more prohibitive, fraud and abuse statutes or regulations that apply to items and services reimbursed under Medicaid and other state programs, or, in several states, apply regardless of the payor. Additionally, to the extent that our product candidates may in the future be sold in a foreign country, we may be subject to similar foreign laws.
We may be subject to data privacy and security regulations by both the federal government and the states in which we conduct our business. HIPAA, as amended by the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act (“HITECH”) and its implementing regulations, imposes requirements relating to the privacy, security and transmission of individually identifiable health information. Among other things, HITECH makes HIPAA’s privacy and security standards directly applicable to business associates, independent contractors, or agents of covered entities that receive or obtain protected health information in connection with providing a service on behalf of a covered entity. HITECH also created four new tiers of civil monetary penalties, amended HIPAA to make civil and criminal penalties directly applicable to business associates, and gave state attorneys general new authority to file civil actions for damages or injunctions in federal courts to enforce HIPAA and seek attorneys’ fees and costs associated with pursuing federal civil actions. In addition, many state laws govern the privacy and security of health information in specified circumstances, many of which differ from each other in significant ways, are often not preempted by HIPAA, and may have a more prohibitive effect than HIPAA, thus complicating compliance efforts. Additionally, more general personal privacy laws have also been enacted by various States and by other countries where we do business, such as member countries of the European Union, that require adoption of policies and procedures to protect, properly store, and to obtain permission to use in our business and clinical research.
Certain states have passed privacy laws that may complicate our privacy compliance efforts. For example, in California, the California Consumer Protection Act (“CCPA”), which went into effect on January 1, 2020, established a new privacy framework for covered businesses by creating an expanded definition of personal information, establishing new data privacy rights for consumers in the State of California, imposing special rules on the collection of consumer data from minors, and creating a new and potentially severe statutory damages framework for violations of the CCPA and for businesses that fail to implement reasonable security procedures and practices to prevent data breaches. The CCPA requires covered businesses to provide certain disclosures to consumers about its data collection, use and sharing practices, and to provide affected California residents with ways to opt out of certain sales or transfers of personal information. The CCPA has been in effect since January 1, 2020, and the California State Attorney General began enforcement on July 1, 2020. Further, a new California privacy law, the California Privacy Rights Act (“CPRA”) was passed by California voters on November 3, 2020. The CPRA will create additional obligations with respect to processing and storing personal information that are scheduled to take effect on January 1, 2023 (with certain provisions having retroactive effect to January 1, 2022). We will continue to monitor developments related to the CPRA and anticipate additional costs and expenses associated with CPRA compliance. Other U.S. states also are considering omnibus privacy legislation and industry organizations regularly adopt and advocate for new standards in these areas. While the CCPA and CPRA contain an exception for certain activities involving PHI under HIPAA, we cannot yet determine the impact the CCPA, CPRA, or other such future laws, regulations, and standards may have on our business. The collection and use of PHI in the EU is governed, as of May 25, 2018, by the General Data Protection Regulation (“GDPR”). The GDPR imposes several requirements on companies that process personal data, including requirements relating to the processing of health and other sensitive data, the consent of the individuals to whom the personal data relates, the information provided to the individuals regarding data processing activities, the notification of data processing obligations to the competent national data protection authorities, and certain measures to be taken when engaging third-party processors. The GDPR also imposes strict rules on the transfer of personal data out of the EEA, including to the U.S. Failure to comply with the requirements of the GDPR, and the related national data protection laws of the EU Member States, may result in fines and other administrative penalties, including potential fines of up to €20 million or 4% of annual global revenues, whichever is greater. The GDPR also confers a private right of action on data subjects and consumer associations to lodge complaints with supervisory authorities, seek judicial remedies, and obtain compensation for damages resulting from violations of the GDPR. The GDPR regulations may impose additional responsibility and liability in relation to personal data that we process, and we may be required to put in place additional mechanisms ensuring compliance with the new data protection rules, including as implemented by individual countries. This may be onerous and adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, and prospects. In addition, further to the UK’s exit from the EU on January 31, 2020, the GDPR ceased to apply in the UK at the end of the transition period on December 31, 2020. However, as of January 1, 2021, the UK’s European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018 incorporated the GDPR (as it existed on December 31, 2020 but subject to certain UK specific amendments) into UK law (referred to as the “UK GDPR”). The UK GDPR and the UK Data Protection Act 2018 set out the UK’s data protection regime, which is independent from but aligned to, the EU’s data protection regime. Non-compliance with the UK GDPR may result in monetary penalties of up to £17.5 million or 4% of worldwide revenue, whichever is higher. The UK, however, is now regarded as a third country under the EU’s GDPR which means that transfers of personal data from the EEA to the UK will be restricted unless an appropriate safeguard, as recognized by the EU’s GDPR, has been put in place. Although, under the EU-UK Trade Cooperation Agreement, it is lawful to transfer personal data between the UK and the EEA for a six-month period following the end of the transition period, with a view to achieving an adequacy decision from the European Commission during that period. Like the EU GDPR, the UK GDPR restricts personal data transfers outside the UK to countries not regarded by the UK as providing adequate protection (this means that personal data transfers from the UK to the EEA remain free flowing). Compliance with the GDPR and the UK GDPR is a rigorous and time-intensive process that may increase our cost of doing business or require us to change our business practices, and despite those efforts, there is a risk that we may be subject to fines and penalties, litigation, and reputational harm in connection with any future European or UK activities.
Failure to comply could result in penalties and interruption of our business should a violation occur.
We expect our product candidates, once approved, may be eligible for coverage under Medicare, the federal health care program that provides health care benefits to the aged and disabled, and covers outpatient services and supplies, including certain pharmaceutical products, that are medically necessary to treat a beneficiary’s health condition. In addition, our product candidates may be covered and reimbursed under other government programs, such as Medicaid and the 340B Drug Pricing Program. The Medicaid Drug Rebate Program requires pharmaceutical manufacturers to enter into and have in effect a national rebate agreement with the HHS as a condition for states to receive federal matching funds for the manufacturer’s outpatient drugs furnished to Medicaid patients. Under the 340B Drug Pricing Program, the manufacturer must extend discounts to entities that participate in the program. As part of the requirements to participate in certain government programs, many pharmaceutical manufacturers must calculate and report certain price reporting metrics to the government, such as average manufacturer price, or AMP, and best price. Penalties may apply in some cases when such metrics are not submitted accurately and timely.
Additionally, the federal Physician Payments Sunshine Act (the “Sunshine Act”), within the ACA, and its implementing regulations, require that certain manufacturers of drugs, devices, biological and medical supplies for which payment is available under Medicare, Medicaid or the Children’s Health Insurance Program (with certain exceptions) report annually to CMS information related to certain payments or other transfers of value made or distributed to physicians (defined to include doctors, dentists, optometrists, podiatrists, and chiropractors) and teaching hospitals, or to entities or individuals at the request of, or designated on behalf of, the physicians and teaching hospitals and to report annually certain ownership and investment interests held by physicians and their immediate family members. Failure to report accurately could result in penalties. Effective January 1, 2022, these reporting obligations will extend to include information related to payments and other transfers of value provided in the previous year to certain non-physician providers such as physician assistants and nurse practitioners. In addition, many states also govern the reporting of payments or other transfers of value, many of which differ from each other in significant ways, are often not preempted, and may have a more prohibitive effect than the Sunshine Act, thus further complicating compliance efforts.
Environment
Our third-party manufacturers are subject to inspections by the FDA for compliance with cGMP and other U.S. regulatory requirements, including U.S. federal, state, and local regulations regarding environmental protection and hazardous and controlled substance controls, among others. Environmental laws and regulations are complex, change frequently, and have tended to become more stringent over time. We have incurred, and may continue to incur, significant expenditures to ensure we are in compliance with these laws and regulations. We would be subject to significant penalties for failure to comply with these laws and regulations.
Human Capital Management
As of December 31, 2020, we had 302 full-time employees, of whom 218 are engaged in research and development and 84 in administration. None of our employees are represented by a labor union or covered by a collective bargaining agreement. Geographically, 234 of our employees are located in Massachusetts, 44 are located in Colorado, and 22 work remotely in the U.S. Two of our employees are located in Germany. Approximately 20% of our employees hold Ph.D. or M.D. degrees and approximately 40% hold master’s degrees or other post-graduate degrees. 34% of our employees are ethnic or racial minorities. 22% of Dicerna’s director-level and above positions are held by ethnic or racial minorities. 40% of our positions at the director level and above are held by women.
In order to achieve our Company’s goals, it is paramount that we continue to attract and retain top talent. We seek to hire employees who are passionate about and will reflect our core values of dedication, equality, communication, excellence, respect, innovation, and accountability. Therefore, we strive to make Dicerna a diverse and inclusive environment, rich with opportunities for our employees to grow and develop in their careers and personally. Through our culture, we foster diversity and inclusion of all employees. “Equality” is one of our core values, and every month, a member of the executive leadership team nominates a team member who exemplifies our core values to promote and continue to foster the values throughout the employee population. We also donate to several non-profit organizations that aid people of various races and socioeconomic statuses to assist in reaching their career aspirations. We provide mandatory anti-harassment training, coaching, individualized training, management training, conference attendance, and financial support which includes tuition reimbursement. We also offer wellness programs and seminars to all employees and provide an on-site gym at one of our facilities in Lexington, Massachusetts.
We believe our employees are our greatest asset, and therefore, we compensate our employees competitively, striving to be in the 50th-60th percentile of our peers for total compensation and benefits. In addition to salaries, our compensation and benefits program includes annual discretionary bonuses, equity awards, an employee stock purchase plan, a 401(k) plan, healthcare and insurance benefits, health savings and flexible spending accounts, paid time off, and family leave. Our annual bonus is based on the achievement of our corporate goals.
Beginning in March 2020, we adapted our environment and practices to increase the safety of our employees during the COVID-19 pandemic. To date, we have required COVID-19 safety training of all employees and have implemented numerous safety protocols, including a requirement to wear masks in all locations, training on the appropriate use of personal protective equipment (“PPE”) and providing additional PPE while in our facilities, increasing cleaning efforts, and decreasing density and increasing physical distancing in our offices and laboratory, as well as requiring an online application to confirm no illness, symptoms, or exposure to COVID-19 for essential laboratory employees who need to be on-site. All other employees have been permitted to work from home since March 2020. In order to allow for employees to work productively from home, we provided a small subsidy for office equipment to all employees in 2020. To help our employees take care of their well-being, we began to offer three different exercise classes virtually each week. We also provided additional holidays and time off to allow employees to recharge.
Corporate Information
Our executive offices are located at 75 Hayden Avenue, Lexington, MA 02421, and our main telephone number is (617) 621-8097. Our website is located at www.dicerna.com, which contains information about us. The information in, or that can be accessed through, our website is not part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Our Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, and Current Reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act are available, free of charge, on or through our website as soon as reasonably practicable after such reports and amendments are electronically filed with or furnished to the SEC. The SEC maintains an Internet site that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding our filings at www.sec.gov.

---

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
We are providing the following cautionary discussion of risk factors, uncertainties, and assumptions that we believe are relevant to our business. These are factors that we believe, individually or in the aggregate, could cause our actual results to differ materially from expected and historical results and our forward-looking statements. We note these factors for investors as permitted by Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. You should understand that it is not possible to predict or identify all such factors. Consequently, you should not consider this section to be a complete discussion of all potential risks or uncertainties that may substantially impact our business. Moreover, we operate in a competitive and rapidly changing environment. New factors emerge from time to time, and it is not possible to predict the impact of all these factors on our business, financial condition, or results of operations.
Risks Related to Our Business and Strategy
Business interruptions resulting from the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) outbreak or similar public health crises could cause a disruption of the development of our product candidates and adversely impact our business.
Public health crises such as pandemics or similar outbreaks could adversely impact our business. In December 2019, a novel strain of a virus named SARS-CoV-2 (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2), or coronavirus, which causes coronavirus disease “COVID-19” was reported to have surfaced in Wuhan, China and has reached multiple other regions and countries, including Lexington, Massachusetts, where our primary office and laboratory space is located, and in Boulder, Colorado, where we also have office space. The coronavirus pandemic is evolving, and to date has led to the implementation of various responses, including government-imposed quarantines, travel restrictions, and other public health safety measures. It is difficult to predict what the lasting impact of the pandemic will be, and what the impact might be if the Company or any of the third parties with whom it engages were to experience additional shutdowns or other prolonged business disruptions. In the last quarter of 2020, a “second wave” of COVID-19 and additional lockdowns have been placed into effect in several parts of the United States (“U.S.”). New strains of COVID-19 were reported in different parts of the world in December 2020 and has since reached the U.S. Depending on the duration and impact of the resurgence and new strains of COVID-19 and depending on where the infections rates are highest, the Company’s business, results of operations, and financial condition may be negatively impacted, including on the ability of regulators to continue ensuring the timely review and approval of applications. For example, as of June 23, 2020, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) noted it is continuing to ensure timely reviews of applications for medical products during the COVID-19 pandemic in line with its user fee performance goals; however, the FDA may not be able to continue its current pace and approval timelines could be extended, including where a pre-approval inspection or an inspection of clinical sites is required and, due to the COVID-19 pandemic and travel restrictions, the FDA is unable to complete such required inspections during the review period. In 2020, several companies announced receipt of complete response letters due to the FDA’s inability to complete required inspections for their applications. The Company’s ability to conduct its business in the manner and on the timelines presently planned could have a material adverse impact on the Company’s business, results of operations, and financial condition. In addition, the recurrence or resurgence of COVID-19 cases could cause other widespread or more severe impacts depending on where infection rates are highest. While certain vaccines and treatments for COVID-19 have been authorized for use, some in emergency cases, there can be no assurance that such measures will help or slow the progression of the COVID-19 virus in a timely manner or at all.
In many of the territories in which we operate our clinical trials, the COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in suspended enrollment and dosing in certain of the clinical trials of our product candidates, as well as changes in our business generally, including:
•diversion of healthcare resources away from the conduct of clinical trials to focus on pandemic concerns, including the attention of physicians serving as our clinical trial investigators, hospitals serving as our clinical trial sites, and hospital staff supporting the conduct of our clinical trials, including, for example, the interruption of enrollment of participants in clinical studies where enrollment involves interactions with participants at hospitals or medical facilities during the COVID-19 pandemic at some of our clinical trial sites;
•the potential for delay or disruption of the conduct of healthy volunteer human clinical studies that are needed to begin clinical development of some early-stage clinical programs, where the product candidate could impair the immune response to the COVID-19 virus; for example, the potential for delay or disruption of the Phase 1 study of belcesiran (formerly DCR-A1AT) in healthy volunteers and clinical trials for nedosiran;
•limitations on travel that have interrupted key trial activities, such as clinical trial site initiations and monitoring, domestic and international travel by employees, contractors, or patients to clinical trial sites, including any government-imposed travel restrictions or quarantines that may impact the ability or willingness of patients, employees, or contractors to travel to our clinical trial sites or secure visas or entry permissions, any of which could delay or adversely impact the conduct or progress and monitoring of our clinical trials;
•the interruption in global shipping affecting the transport of clinical trial materials, such as patient samples, investigational drug product, and other supplies used in our clinical trials;
•business disruptions caused by workplace, laboratory, and office closures, and an increased reliance on employees working from home, disruptions to or delays in ongoing laboratory experiments and operations, staffing shortages, travel limitations or mass transit disruptions, any of which could adversely impact our business operations, impair the productivity of our personnel, subject us to additional cybersecurity risks, create data accessibility problems, cause us to become more susceptible to communication disruptions, or delay necessary interactions with local regulators, ethics committees, and other important agencies and contractors; and
•the demand of fill and finish capacity of final product in syringes by manufacturers producing COVID-19 vaccine products, and U.S. government exercise of its Defense Product Act authorities to mandate priority rated orders for production of vaccines or other supplies, could disrupt or delay the production of injectable medicines in the next 12-18 months, including our future scheduling of production runs for our and our collaborative partners’ products.
These and other factors arising from the coronavirus could worsen in countries that are already impacted by the coronavirus or could continue to spread to additional countries, each of which could further adversely impact our ability to conduct clinical trials and our business generally and could have a material adverse impact on our operations and financial condition and results.
We will need to raise substantial additional funds to advance development of our product candidates and to commercialize any product candidates that receive marketing approval, and we cannot guarantee that we will have sufficient funds available in the future to develop and commercialize our current or future product candidates. Raising additional funds may cause dilution to our stockholders, restrict our operations, or require us to relinquish control over our technologies or product candidates.
We will need to raise substantial additional funds to expand our development, regulatory, manufacturing, marketing, sales, and general and administrative operations capabilities, whether internally or through other organizations. We have used substantial funds to develop our product candidates and delivery technologies and will require significant funds to conduct further research and development and preclinical testing and clinical trials of our product candidates, to seek regulatory approvals for our product candidates, and to manufacture and market products, if any are approved for commercial sale. As of December 31, 2020, we had $568.8 million in cash, cash equivalents, and held-to-maturity investments. Based on our current operating plan and liquidity, we believe that our available cash, cash equivalents, held-to-maturity investments, and anticipated milestone and other payments from existing collaborations will be sufficient to fund the execution of our current clinical and operating plan into 2023. However, to the extent our clinical and operating plan changes, we will need to raise substantial additional funds. Further, our future capital requirements and the period for which our existing resources are able to support our operations may vary significantly from what we expect. Our monthly spending levels vary based on new and ongoing development and corporate activities. Because the length of time and activities associated with successful development of our product candidates is highly uncertain, we are unable to estimate the actual funds we will require for development and any approved marketing and commercialization activities. To execute our business plan, we will need, among other things:
•to obtain the human and financial resources necessary to develop, test, obtain regulatory approval for, manufacture, and market our product candidates and manage the increased time to complete development of some programs due to the COVID-19 pandemic;
•to build and maintain a strong intellectual property portfolio and avoid infringing intellectual property of third parties;
•to establish and maintain successful licenses, collaborations, and alliances;
•to satisfy the requirements of clinical trial protocols, including patient enrollment;
•to establish and demonstrate the clinical efficacy and safety of our product candidates;
•to manage our spending as costs and expenses increase due to preclinical studies and clinical trials, regulatory approvals, manufacturing scale-up, and commercialization;
•to establish and maintain a commercialization infrastructure for any product candidates that receive marketing approval that we intend to commercialize independently;
•to obtain additional capital to support and expand our operations;
•to satisfy the requirements for quality and safety in developing and commercializing our products; and
•to market our products to achieve acceptance and use by the medical community.
If we are unable to obtain funding on a timely basis or on acceptable terms, we may have to delay, reduce, or terminate our research and development programs and preclinical studies or clinical trials, if any, delay or cease our efforts to build our commercial capabilities, limit strategic opportunities, or undergo reductions in our workforce or other corporate restructuring activities. We also could be required to seek funds through arrangements with collaborators or others that may require us to relinquish development or commercialization rights to some of our technologies or product candidates that we would otherwise pursue on our own. We do not expect to realize revenue from product sales in the near-term, if at all, and milestone payments, if any, are based on third-party determinations and/or events outside our control. Our revenue sources currently are, and will remain, limited unless and until our product candidates are clinically tested, approved for commercialization, and successfully marketed. To date, we have financed our operations primarily through the sale of securities, research collaborations and license agreements, debt financings, and credit and loan facilities. We will be required to seek additional funding in the future and intend to do so through a combination of public or private equity offerings, debt financings, and research collaborations and license agreements. Our ability to raise additional funds will depend on financial, economic, and other factors, many of which are beyond our control. For example, a number of factors, including the timing and outcomes of our clinical activities, as well as conditions in the global financial markets, may present significant challenges to accessing the capital markets at a time when we would like or require, and at an increased cost of capital. Additional funds may not be available to us on acceptable terms or at all. If we raise additional funds by issuing equity securities, our stockholders will suffer dilution, and the terms of any financing may adversely affect the rights of our stockholders. In addition, as a condition to providing additional funds to us, future investors may demand, and may be granted, rights superior to those of existing stockholders. Debt financing, if available, may involve restrictive covenants limiting our flexibility in conducting future business activities, and, in the event of insolvency, debt holders would be repaid before holders of equity securities receive any distribution of corporate assets.
We have a history of operating losses; we expect to continue to incur significant losses for the foreseeable future and may never achieve or maintain profitability, which could result in a decline in the market value of our common stock.
We are a biopharmaceutical company with a limited operating history focused on the discovery and development of treatments based on the emerging therapeutic modality ribonucleic acid interference (“RNAi”), a biological process in which ribonucleic acid (“RNA”) molecules inhibit gene expression. Since our inception in October 2006, we have devoted our resources to the development of RNAi molecules and delivery technologies. We have had significant operating losses since our inception. As of December 31, 2020, we had an accumulated deficit of $638.1 million. For the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018, our net loss attributable to common stockholders was $112.7 million, $120.5 million, and $88.9 million, respectively. Substantially all of our operating losses have resulted from expenses incurred in connection with our research and development programs, from general and administrative costs associated with our operations, and, prior to 2019, litigation expenses associated with the Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“Alnylam”) litigation settled in April 2018. Our technologies and product candidates are in early stages of development, and we are subject to the risks of failure inherent in the development of product candidates based on novel technologies.
We have not generated, and do not expect to generate, any revenue from product sales in the near-term, and we expect to continue to incur significant operating losses for the foreseeable future due to the cost of research and development, preclinical studies and clinical trials, and the regulatory approval process for product candidates. The amount of future losses is uncertain. Our ability to achieve profitability, if ever, will depend on, among other things, us or our existing collaborators, or any future collaborators, successfully developing product candidates, obtaining regulatory approvals to market and commercialize product candidates, manufacturing any approved products on commercially reasonable terms, establishing a sales and marketing organization or suitable third-party alternatives for any approved product, and raising sufficient funds to finance business activities. If we or our existing collaborators, or any future collaborators, are unable to develop and commercialize one or more of our product candidates or if sales revenue from any product candidate that receives approval is insufficient, we will not achieve profitability, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and prospects.
Our quarterly operating results may fluctuate significantly or may fall below the expectations of investors or securities analysts, each of which may cause our stock price to fluctuate or decline.
We expect our operating results to be subject to quarterly fluctuations. Our net loss and other operating results will be affected by numerous factors, including:
•variations in the level of expense related to our product candidates or future development programs;
•additional unanticipated variations due to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the timing of programs and the timing of availability of resources to deploy on such programs;
•delays in enrolling subjects in, initiating, conducting, or releasing results of clinical trials, or the addition or termination of clinical trials or funding support by us, our existing collaborators, or any future collaborator or licensor;
•the timing of the release of results from any clinical trials conducted by us or our collaborators or licensors;
•our execution of any collaboration, licensing, or similar arrangement, and the timing of payments we may make or receive under such existing or future arrangements or the termination or modification of any such existing or future arrangements;
•any intellectual property infringement or misappropriation lawsuit or opposition, interference, re-examination, post-grant review, inter partes review, nullification, derivation action, or cancellation proceeding in which we may become involved;
•additions and departures of key personnel;
•strategic decisions by us and our competitors, such as acquisitions, divestitures, spin-offs, joint ventures, strategic investments, or changes in business strategy;
•if any of our product candidates receive regulatory approval, market acceptance and demand for such product candidates;
•delays in engagement of our third-party manufacturers for our product candidates or their failure to execute on our manufacturing requirements or perform in accordance with current good manufacturing practices (“cGMP”);
•timing of regulatory decisions and regulatory developments affecting our product candidates or those of our competitors;
•disputes concerning patents, proprietary rights, or license and collaboration agreements that negatively impact our receipt of milestone payments or royalties or require us to make significant payments arising from licenses, settlements, adverse judgments, or ongoing royalties;
•delays or suspensions of clinical development or interruptions of the supply chain associated with COVID-19, which have impacted and may continue to impact global healthcare systems and our trial sites’ conduct of clinical trials, such as we have seen or may see in the nedosiran pivotal PHYOX2 and belcesiran Phase 1 studies;
•changes in general market and economic conditions; and
•changes in tax laws.
If our quarterly operating results fluctuate or fall below the expectations of investors or securities analysts, the price of our common stock could fluctuate or decline substantially. We believe that quarterly comparisons of our financial results are not necessarily meaningful and should not be relied upon as an indication of our future performance.
Our approach to the discovery and development of innovative therapeutic treatments based on novel technologies is unproven and may not result in marketable products.
We plan to develop subcutaneously delivered RNAi-based pharmaceuticals using our GalXC technology for the treatment of rare diseases involving the liver and for other therapeutic areas involving the liver such as chronic liver diseases, as well as cardiometabolic diseases and viral diseases. We are also exploring new applications of our RNAi technology with GalXC-Plus, which expands on the functionality and application of our flagship liver-based GalXC technology yet has the potential to treat diseases across multiple therapeutic areas. We believe that product candidates identified with our drug discovery and delivery platform may offer an improved therapeutic approach to small molecules and monoclonal antibodies, as well as several advantages over earlier generation RNAi molecules. However, the scientific research that forms the basis of our efforts to develop product candidates is relatively new. The scientific evidence to support the feasibility of developing therapeutic treatments based on RNAi and GalXC and GalXC-Plus is both preliminary and limited.
Relatively few product candidates based on RNAi have been tested in animals or humans, and a number of clinical trials conducted by other companies using RNAi technologies have not been successful. We may discover that GalXC and GalXC-Plus do not possess certain properties required for a drug to be safe and effective, such as the ability to remain stable in the human body for the period of time required for the drug to reach the target tissue or the ability to cross the cell wall and enter into cells within the target tissue for effective delivery. We currently have only limited data, and no conclusive evidence, to suggest that we can introduce these necessary drug-like properties into GalXC and GalXC-Plus. We may spend substantial funds attempting to introduce these properties and may never succeed in doing so. In addition, product candidates based on GalXC and GalXC-Plus may demonstrate different chemical and pharmacological properties in patients than they do in laboratory studies. Even if product candidates, such as nedosiran, RG6346, belcesiran, and DCR-AUD have successful results in animal studies, they may not demonstrate the same chemical and pharmacological properties in humans and may interact with human biological systems in unforeseen, ineffective, or harmful ways. As a result, we may never succeed in developing a marketable product, we may not become profitable, and the value of our common stock will decline.
Further, the U.S. FDA and other regulatory authorities outside the U.S. have relatively limited experience with RNAi or GalXC-based therapeutics. We and our current collaborators, or any future collaborators, may never receive approval to market and commercialize any product candidate. Even if we or a collaborator obtain regulatory approval, the approval may be for disease indications or patient populations that are not as broad as we intended or desired or may require labeling that includes significant use or distribution restrictions or safety warnings. We or a collaborator may be required to perform additional or unanticipated clinical trials to obtain approval or be subject to post-marketing testing requirements to maintain regulatory approval. If our technologies based on GalXC or GalXC-Plus prove to be ineffective, unsafe, or commercially unviable, our entire platform and pipeline would have little, if any, value, which would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and prospects.
The market may not be receptive to our product candidates based on a novel therapeutic modality, and we may not generate any future revenue from the sale or licensing of product candidates.
Even if approval is obtained for a product candidate, we may not generate or sustain revenue from sales of the product due to numerous factors, including whether the product can be sold at a competitive price and otherwise is accepted in the market. The product candidates that we are developing are based on new technologies and therapeutic approaches. Market participants with significant influence over acceptance of new treatments, such as physicians and third-party payors, may not adopt a treatment based on our technology, and we may not be able to convince the medical community and third-party payors, including health insurers, to accept and use, or to provide favorable coverage of or reimbursement for, any product candidates developed by us or our existing collaborator or any future collaborators. Market acceptance of our product candidates will depend on, among other factors:
•the timing of our receipt of any marketing and commercialization approvals and those of our competitors;
•the terms of any approvals and the countries in which approvals are obtained;
•the safety and efficacy of our product candidates;
•the prevalence and severity of any adverse side effects associated with our product candidates;
•limitations or warnings contained in any labeling approved by the FDA or other regulatory authority;
•relative convenience and ease of administration of our product candidates;
•the willingness of physicians and patients to accept any new methods of administration;
•the ability to diagnose the disease targeted by our product candidates;
•the success of our physician education programs;
•the availability of adequate government and third-party payor coverage and reimbursement;
•the pricing of our products, particularly as compared to alternative treatments and the recommendations of public or private pricing review agencies or organizations regarding our products;
•our ability to market and sell our products in compliance with applicable law; and
•availability of alternative effective treatments for the disease indications our product candidates are intended to treat and the relative risks, benefits, and costs of those treatments.
With our focus on the emerging therapeutic modality RNAi, these risks may increase to the extent the market becomes more competitive or less favorable to this approach. Additional risks apply to any disease indications we pursue which are for rare diseases. Because of the small patient population for a rare disease, if pricing is not approved or accepted in the market at an appropriate level for an approved rare disease product, such drug may not generate enough revenue to offset costs of development, manufacturing, marketing, and commercialization, despite any benefits received from our efforts to obtain orphan drug designation by regulatory agencies in major commercial markets, such as the U.S., the European Union (“EU”), and Japan. These benefits may include market exclusivity, assistance in clinical trial design, or a reduction in user fees or tax credits related to development expense. Market size is also a variable in disease indications that are not classified as rare. Our estimates regarding potential market size for any indication may be materially different from what we discover to exist if we ever get to the point of product commercialization, which could result in significant changes in our business plan and have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and prospects.
If a product candidate that has orphan drug designation subsequently receives the first FDA approval for the indication for that designation, the product candidate is entitled to orphan product exclusivity, which means that the FDA may not approve any other applications to market the same drug for the same indication, except in very limited circumstances, for seven years. Orphan drug exclusivity, however, could also block the approval of one of our product candidates for seven years if a competitor obtains approval of the same drug for the same indication as defined by the FDA.
Even if we, or any future collaborators, obtain orphan drug exclusivity for a product, such as we obtained in March 2020 for belcesiran for the treatment of alpha-1 antitrypsin (“AAT”) deficiency (“AATD”), that exclusivity may not effectively protect the product from competition because different drugs can be approved for the same condition. Even after an orphan drug is approved, the FDA can subsequently approve the same drug for the same condition if the FDA concludes that the later drug is clinically superior in that it is shown to be safer, more effective, or makes a major contribution to patient care.
On August 3, 2017, the U.S. Congress passed the FDA Reauthorization Act of 2017 (“FDARA”). FDARA, among other things, codified the FDA’s preexisting regulatory interpretation, to require that a drug Sponsor demonstrate the clinical superiority of an orphan drug that is otherwise the same as a previously approved drug for the same rare disease in order to receive orphan drug exclusivity. The law reverses prior precedent holding that the Orphan Drug Act unambiguously requires that the FDA recognize the orphan exclusivity period regardless of a showing of clinical superiority. Moreover, in the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2021, Congress did not further change this interpretation when it clarified that the interpretation codified in FDARA would apply in cases where the FDA issued an orphan designation before the enactment of FDARA but where product approval came after the enactment of FDARA. The FDA may further reevaluate the Orphan Drug Act and its regulations and policies. We do not know if, when, or how the FDA may change the orphan drug regulations and policies in the future, and it is uncertain how any changes might affect our business. Depending on what changes the FDA may make to its orphan drug regulations and policies, our business could be adversely impacted.
As in the U.S., we may apply for designation of a product candidate as an orphan drug for the treatment of a specific indication in the EU before the application for marketing authorization is made. For example, in August 2018, the European Medicines Agency (“EMA”)’s Committee for Orphan Medicinal Products (“COMP”) designated nedosiran as an orphan medicinal product for the treatment of primary hyperoxaluria (“PH”) in the EU. In March 2020, the FDA granted orphan drug designation to belcesiran for the treatment of AATD. In December 2019, the European Commission granted orphan drug designation to belcesiran for the treatment of congenital AATD based on a positive opinion from the COMP of the EMA. Sponsors of orphan drugs in the EU can enjoy economic and marketing benefits, including up to 10 years of market exclusivity for the approved indication. During such period, marketing authorization applications for a “similar medicinal product” will not be accepted, unless another applicant can show that its product is safer, more effective, or otherwise clinically superior to the orphan-designated product. In the EU, a “similar medicinal product” is a medicinal product containing a similar active substance or substances as contained in a currently authorized orphan medicinal product, and which is intended for the same therapeutic indication. The respective orphan designation and exclusivity frameworks in the U.S. and in the EU are subject to change, and any such changes may affect our ability to obtain U.S. or EU orphan designations in the future.
Our product candidates are in varied stages of development, including some in early stages, and may fail or suffer delays that materially and adversely affect their commercial viability.
We currently have no products on the market and our product candidates are in varied stages of development. While our lead product candidate, nedosiran, is currently in registrational studies, there can be no assurance that such studies will generate results to support marketing approval for such product candidate in its intended indications. Our ability to achieve and sustain profitability depends on obtaining regulatory approvals, including Institutional Review Board (“IRB”) ethics committee approval, to conduct clinical trials at particular sites, successfully completing our clinical trials, and successfully commercializing our product candidates, either alone or with third parties, such as our collaborators. Before obtaining regulatory approval for the commercial distribution of our product candidates, we or a collaborator must conduct extensive preclinical tests and clinical trials to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of our product candidates in humans. Preclinical testing and clinical trials are expensive, difficult to design and implement, can take many years to complete, and are uncertain as to outcome. The start or end of a clinical study is often delayed or halted due to changing regulatory requirements, manufacturing challenges, required clinical trial administrative actions, slower than anticipated patient enrollment, changing standards of care, availability or prevalence of use of a comparative drug or required prior therapy, clinical outcomes, and financial constraints. For instance, delays or difficulties in patient enrollment or difficulties in retaining trial participants can result in increased costs, longer development times, or termination of a clinical trial. Clinical trials of a new product candidate require the enrollment of a sufficient number of patients, including patients who are suffering from the disease the product candidate is intended to treat and who meet other eligibility criteria. Rates of patient enrollment are affected by many factors, including the size of the patient population, the eligibility criteria for the clinical trial, the age and condition of the patients, the stage and severity of disease, the nature of the protocol, the proximity of patients to clinical sites, and the availability of effective treatments for the relevant disease. Thus, enrollment of sufficient patients can be challenging for rare disease drug development programs where patient populations are inherently small in size, particularly when there are competitive clinical trials. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, we have experienced delays in enrollment and dosing in certain of our clinical trials for our product candidates and this risk of delays remains ongoing.
A product candidate can unexpectedly fail at any stage of preclinical and clinical development. The historical failure rate for product candidates is high due to many factors, including scientific feasibility, safety, efficacy, and changing standards of medical care. The results from preclinical testing or early clinical trials of a product candidate may not predict the results that will be obtained in later phase clinical trials of the product candidate.
We, the FDA or other applicable regulatory authorities, an individual IRB with respect to its institution, or an independent ethics committee may suspend clinical trials of a product candidate at any time for various reasons, including a belief that individuals participating in such trials are being exposed to unacceptable health risks or adverse side effects. We may not have the financial resources to continue development of, or to enter into collaborations for, a product candidate if we experience any problems or other unforeseen events that delay or prevent regulatory approval of, or our ability to commercialize, product candidates, including:
•negative or inconclusive results from our clinical trials or the clinical trials of others for product candidates similar to ours, leading to a decision or requirement to conduct additional preclinical testing or clinical trials or abandon a program;
•serious and unexpected drug-related side effects experienced by participants using our products in our clinical trials or by individuals using drugs similar to our product candidates;
•delays in submitting investigational new drugs (“INDs”) or comparable foreign applications or delays or failures in obtaining the necessary approvals from regulators or IRBs to commence a clinical trial, or a suspension or termination of a clinical trial once commenced;
•conditions imposed by the FDA or comparable foreign authorities, such as the EMA, regarding the scope or design of our clinical trials;
•competition for subjects in competitive clinical trials and delays in enrolling individuals in clinical trials;
•high drop-out rates of study participants;
•inadequate supply or quality of drug product or product candidate components or materials or other supplies necessary for the conduct of our clinical trials;
•greater than anticipated clinical trial costs;
•poor effectiveness of our product candidates during clinical trials;
•unfavorable FDA or other regulatory agency inspection of a manufacturing or clinical trial site or the inability to complete any required inspections during the review of any marketing application;
•failure of our third-party contractors or investigators to comply with regulatory requirements or otherwise meet their contractual obligations in a timely manner, or at all;
•delays and changes in regulatory requirements, policy and guidelines, including the imposition of additional regulatory oversight around clinical testing generally or with respect to our technology in particular, including, for example, compliance with FDA and other regulatory requirements associated with the COVID-19 pandemic; and
•varying interpretations of data by the FDA and foreign regulatory agencies.
Breakthrough Therapy Designation by the FDA may not actually lead to a faster development or regulatory review or approval process.
The FDA has granted Breakthrough Therapy Designation to nedosiran for the treatment of patients with PH type 1 (“PH1”). A breakthrough therapy is defined as a drug that is intended, alone or in combination with one or more other drugs, to treat a serious or life-threatening disease or condition, and preliminary clinical evidence indicates that the drug may demonstrate substantial improvement over currently approved therapies on one or more clinically significant endpoints, such as substantial treatment effects observed early in clinical development. The FDA will work closely with us to provide guidance on subsequent development of nedosiran for treatment of PH1 to help us design and conduct a development program as efficiently as possible. For drugs that have been designated as breakthrough therapies, interaction and communication between the FDA and the Sponsor of the trial can help to identify the most efficient path for clinical development while minimizing the number of patients placed in ineffective control regimens. Drugs designated as breakthrough therapies by the FDA are also eligible for accelerated approval and priority review.
Designation as a breakthrough therapy is within the discretion of the FDA. Accordingly, even if we believe a product candidate we develop meets the criteria for designation as a breakthrough therapy, the FDA may disagree and instead determine not to make such designation. In any event, the receipt of Breakthrough Therapy Designation may not result in a faster development process, review, or approval compared to drugs considered for approval under conventional FDA procedures and does not assure ultimate approval by the FDA. In addition, even if a product candidate qualifies as a breakthrough therapy, the FDA may later decide that the drug no longer meets the conditions for qualification and rescind the Breakthrough Therapy Designation. If the Breakthrough Therapy Designation for nedosiran for treatment of PH1 is rescinded, submission of portions of the New Drug Application (“NDA”) will not be permitted under this program.
We are dependent on our collaboration partners for the successful development of product candidates and, therefore, are subject to the efforts of these partners and our ability to successfully collaborate with these partners.
We have entered into collaboration agreements with Novo Nordisk A/S (“Novo”), F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd and Hoffmann-La Roche Inc. (together, “Roche”), Eli Lilly, and Company (“Lilly”), Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (together with its affiliates, “Alexion”), Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH (“BI”), and Alnylam (collectively, our “Collaboration Partners”) for the successful development and commercialization of product candidates. The success of our collaborations with our Collaboration Partners and the realization of the milestone and royalty payments under the collaboration agreements depends upon the efforts of our Collaboration Partners, to the extent they are responsible for performance of collaboration activities. Each collaboration partner may not be successful in performance of such activities, including, for example, obtaining approvals for the product candidates developed under the collaboration or in marketing, or arranging for necessary supply, manufacturing, or distribution relationships for, any approved products. Our Collaboration Partners may change their strategic focus or pursue alternative technologies in a manner that results in reduced, delayed, or no additional payments to us under the collaboration agreements. In December 2020, one of our Collaboration Partners, Alexion, entered into a definitive agreement for AstraZeneca to acquire Alexion, which may result in delays and other strategic changes that negatively impact our collaboration with Alexion. Our Collaboration Partners have a variety of marketed products and product candidates under collaboration with other companies, possibly including some of our competitors, and our Collaboration Partners’ own corporate objectives may not be consistent with our interests. If our Collaboration Partners fail to develop, obtain regulatory approval for, or ultimately commercialize any product candidate under our collaborations, or if any of our Collaboration Partners terminates their applicable collaboration, our business, financial condition, results of operations, and prospects could be materially and adversely affected. Each of our collaboration agreements is terminable by the applicable collaboration partner any time at will, subject to compliance with applicable notice periods. In addition, if we have a dispute or enter into litigation with any of our Collaboration Partners in the future, it could delay development programs, create uncertainty as to ownership of intellectual property rights, distract management from other business activities, and generate substantial expense.
If third parties on which we depend to conduct our preclinical studies, or any future clinical trials, do not perform as contractually required, fail to satisfy regulatory or legal requirements, or miss expected deadlines, our development program could be delayed with materially adverse effects on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and prospects.
We rely on third-party clinical investigators, contract research organizations (“CROs”), clinical data management organizations, and consultants to design, conduct, supervise, and monitor preclinical studies of our product candidates and will do the same for any clinical trials. Because we rely on third parties and do not have the ability to conduct preclinical studies or clinical trials independently, we have less control over the timing, quality, compliance, and other aspects of preclinical studies and clinical trials than we would if we conducted them on our own. These investigators, CROs, and consultants are not our employees and we have limited control over the amount of time and resources that they dedicate to our programs. These third parties may have contractual relationships with other entities, some of which may be our competitors, which may draw time and resources from our programs. The third parties with which we contract might not be diligent, careful, compliant, or timely in conducting our preclinical studies or clinical trials, resulting in the preclinical studies or clinical trials being delayed or unsuccessful.
If we cannot contract with acceptable third parties on commercially reasonable terms, or at all, or if these third parties do not carry out their contractual duties, satisfy legal and regulatory requirements for the conduct of preclinical studies or clinical trials, or meet expected deadlines, our clinical development programs could be delayed and otherwise adversely affected. In all events, we are responsible for ensuring that each of our preclinical studies and clinical trials is conducted in accordance with the general investigational plan and protocols for the trial as well as applicable laws and regulations. The FDA and certain foreign regulatory authorities, such as the EMA, require preclinical studies to be conducted in accordance with applicable good laboratory practices and clinical trials to be conducted in accordance with applicable FDA regulations and applicable good clinical practices, including requirements for conducting, recording, and reporting the results of preclinical studies and clinical trials to assure that data and reported results are credible and accurate and that the rights, integrity, and confidentiality of clinical trial participants are protected. Our reliance on third parties that we do not control does not relieve us of these responsibilities and requirements. Any such event could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and prospects.
Because we rely on third-party manufacturing and supply partners, our supply of research and development, preclinical studies, and clinical trial materials may become limited or interrupted or may not be of satisfactory quantity or quality.
We rely on third-party supply and manufacturing companies and organizations to supply the materials, components, and manufacturing services for our research and development, preclinical study, and clinical trial drug supplies. We do not own or lease manufacturing facilities or supply sources for such components and materials; however, we entered into an initial five-year agreement with a supplier for the development, manufacture, and supply of clinical products; this agreement allows for advance preferential scheduling to the manufacturing line. Our manufacturing requirements include oligonucleotides and custom amidites which we procure on a purchase order basis. In addition, for each product candidate, we typically contract with only one manufacturer for the formulation and filling of drug product. There can be no assurance that our supply of research and development, preclinical study, and clinical trial drugs and other materials will not be limited, interrupted, restricted in certain geographic regions, or of satisfactory quality, or continue to be available at acceptable prices. In particular, any replacement of our drug substance manufacturer could require significant effort and expertise because there may be a limited number of qualified replacements.
Although we have multiple contract manufacturers, two of our amidite manufacturers are based in China, and as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic and an increase in potential political uncertainty, there is an increased risk of technology transfer and supply interruption at those facilities. We are seeking to expand amidite production in other countries and to manufacture inventory to reduce this risk.
If we are at any time unable to provide an uninterrupted supply of our product candidates or, following regulatory approval, any products to patients, we may lose patients, physicians may elect to utilize competing therapeutics instead of our products, and our clinical trials may be adversely affected, which could materially and adversely affect our clinical trial outcomes.
The manufacturing process for a product candidate is subject to FDA and foreign regulatory authority review. Suppliers and manufacturers must meet applicable manufacturing requirements and undergo rigorous facility and process validation tests required by regulatory authorities in order to comply with regulatory standards such as cGMP. In the event that any of our suppliers or manufacturers fails to comply with such requirements or to perform its obligations regarding quality, timing or otherwise, or if our supply of components or other materials becomes limited or interrupted for other reasons, we may experience shortages resulting in delayed shipments, supply constraints and/or stock-outs of our products, be forced to manufacture the materials ourselves, for which we currently do not have the capabilities or resources, or enter into an agreement with another third party, which we may not be able to do on reasonable terms, if at all. In some cases, the technical skills or technology required to manufacture our product candidates may be unique or proprietary to the original manufacturer and we may have difficulty, or there may be contractual restrictions prohibiting us from, transferring such skills or technology to another third party and a feasible alternative may not exist. These factors would increase our reliance on such manufacturer or require us to obtain a license from such manufacturer in order to have another third party manufacture our product candidates. If we are required to change manufacturers for any reason, we will be required to verify that the new manufacturer maintains facilities and procedures that comply with quality standards and with all applicable regulations. The delays associated with the verification of a new manufacturer could negatively affect our ability to develop product candidates in a timely manner or within budget and any modifications that occur in establishing a new manufacturer could require the conduct of additional studies or trials.
We expect to continue to rely on third-party manufacturers if we receive regulatory approval for any product candidate. To the extent that we have existing, or enter into future, manufacturing arrangements with third parties, we will depend on these third parties to perform their obligations in a timely manner consistent with contractual and regulatory requirements, including those related to quality control and assurance. If we are unable to obtain or maintain third-party manufacturing for product candidates, including on account of government-mandated production requirements that our third-party manufacturing partners experience during the COVID-19 pandemic or future public health emergencies, or to do so on commercially reasonable terms, we may not be able to develop and commercialize our product candidates successfully. Our or a third party’s failure to execute on our manufacturing requirements could adversely affect our business in a number of ways, including:
•an inability to initiate or continue preclinical studies or clinical trials of product candidates under development;
•delay in submitting regulatory applications, or receiving regulatory approvals, for product candidates;
•lack of or loss of the cooperation of a collaborator;
•subjecting manufacturing facilities of our product candidates to additional inspections by regulatory authorities;
•requirements to cease distribution or to recall batches of our product candidates; and
•in the event of approval to market and commercialize a product candidate, an inability to meet commercial demands for our products.
We may not successfully engage in strategic transactions, including any additional collaborations we seek, which could adversely affect our ability to develop and commercialize product candidates, impact our cash position, increase our expense, and present significant distractions to our management.
From time to time, we may consider strategic transactions, such as collaborations, acquisitions of companies, asset purchases, and out- or in-licensing of product candidates or technologies. In addition to our current collaborations with Novo, Roche, Lilly, Alexion, BI, and Alnylam, we will evaluate and, if strategically attractive, seek to enter into additional collaborations, including with major biopharmaceutical, biotechnology, or pharmaceutical companies. The competition for collaborators is intense, and the negotiation process is time-consuming and complex. Any new collaborations may be on terms that are not optimal for us, and we may be unable to maintain any existing or future collaborations if, for example, development or approval of a product candidate is delayed, sales of an approved product do not meet expectations, or a collaborator terminates a collaboration. Any such collaborations, or other strategic transactions, may require us to incur non-recurring or other charges, increase our near- and long-term expenditures, and pose significant integration or implementation challenges or disrupt our management or business. These transactions entail numerous operational and financial risks, including exposure to unknown liabilities, disruption of our business, and diversion of our management’s time and attention in order to obtain and manage a collaboration or develop acquired products, product candidates, or technologies, incurrence of substantial debt or dilutive issuances of equity securities to pay transaction consideration or costs, higher than expected collaboration, acquisition, or integration costs, write-downs of assets or impairment charges, increased amortization expenses, difficulty and cost in facilitating the collaboration or combining the operations and personnel of any acquired business, deterioration of relationships with key suppliers, manufacturers, or customers of any acquired business due to changes in management and ownership and the inability to retain key employees of any acquired business. Accordingly, although there can be no assurance that we will undertake or successfully complete any transactions of the nature described above, any transactions that we do complete may be subject to the foregoing or other risks and have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition, and prospects. Conversely, failure to enter any collaboration or other strategic transaction that would be beneficial to us could delay the development and potential commercialization of our product candidates and have a negative impact on the competitiveness of any product candidate that reaches market.
We face competition from entities that have developed or may develop product candidates for our target disease indications, including companies developing novel treatments and technology platforms based on modalities and technology similar to ours. If these companies develop technologies or product candidates more rapidly than we do or their technologies, including delivery technologies, are more effective, our ability to develop and successfully commercialize product candidates may be adversely affected.
The development and commercialization of drugs is highly competitive. We compete with a variety of multinational pharmaceutical companies and specialized biotechnology companies, as well as technology being developed at universities and other research institutions. Our competitors have developed, are developing, or may develop product candidates and processes competitive with our product candidates, some of which may become commercially available before any of our product candidates. We believe that a significant number of products are currently under development and may become commercially available in the future for the treatment of conditions for which we may try to develop product candidates.
Competitive therapeutic treatments include those that have already been approved and accepted by the medical community and any new treatments that enter the market. We are aware of many companies that are working in the field of RNAi therapeutics, including major pharmaceutical companies and a number of biopharmaceutical companies such as Alnylam, Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Arbutus Biopharma Corporation, Silence Therapeutics plc, and Novartis International AG.
We also compete with companies working to develop antisense and other RNA-based drugs including Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Moderna, Inc., and Wave Life Sciences Ltd. Like RNAi therapeutics, antisense drugs target mRNA with the objective of suppressing the activity of specific genes. The development of antisense drugs is more advanced than that of RNAi therapeutics with several antisense therapies currently approved, and antisense technology may become the preferred technology for products that target mRNAs.
Many of our competitors have significantly greater financial, technical, manufacturing, marketing, sales and supply resources or experience than we have. Some of our competitors may be in the lead in the development of competitive products. If we successfully obtain approval for any product candidate, we will face competition based on many different factors, including safety and effectiveness, ease with which our products can be administered, the timing of product entry into the market, the extent to which patients and physicians accept relatively new routes of administration, timing and scope of regulatory approvals, availability and cost of manufacturing, marketing and sales capabilities, price, reimbursement coverage, and patent position of our products. Competing products could present superior treatment alternatives, including by being more effective, safer, less expensive or marketed and sold more effectively than any products we may develop. Competitive products may make any products we develop obsolete or noncompetitive before we recover the expense of developing and commercializing our product candidates. Competitive products that enter the market before our products could capture significant market share and create barriers to entry to our products. Competitors could also recruit our employees, which could negatively impact our level of expertise and our ability to execute our business plan.
Beyond RNA-based platform competition, there are a number of potential competitors working to develop therapeutics in our areas of research, including Oxthera AB, Allena Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Vertex Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Assembly Biosciences, Inc., Gilead Sciences, Inc., GlaxoSmithKline plc, Vir Biotechnology, Inc., Beam Therapeutics Inc., Intellia Therapeutics, Inc., Apic Bio, Inc., Biocodex, S.A., and Adial Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Any inability to attract and retain qualified key management and personnel would impair our ability to implement our business plan.
Our success largely depends on the continued service of key management and other specialized personnel, such as Douglas M. Fambrough, III, Ph.D., our chief executive officer. The loss of one or more members of our management team or other key employees or advisors could delay our research and development programs and materially harm our business, financial condition, results of operations, and prospects. The relationships that our key managers have cultivated within our industry make us particularly dependent upon their continued employment with us. We are dependent on the continued service of our technical personnel because of the highly complex nature of our product candidates and technologies and the specialized nature of the regulatory approval process. Because our management team and key employees are not obligated to provide us with continued service, they could terminate their employment with us at any time without penalty. We do not maintain key person life insurance policies on any of our management team members or key employees. Our future success will depend in large part on our continued ability to attract and retain other highly qualified scientific, technical, and management personnel, as well as personnel with expertise in clinical testing, manufacturing, governmental regulation, and commercialization. We face competition for personnel from other companies, universities, public and private research institutions, government entities, and other organizations.
Interim and preliminary data from our clinical trials that we announce or publish from time to time may change as more patient data become available or as additional analyses are conducted and as the data are subject to audit and verification procedures that could result in material changes in the final data.
From time to time, we may publish interim or preliminary data from our clinical studies. Interim data from clinical trials that we may complete are subject to the risk that one or more of the clinical outcomes may materially change as patient enrollment continues and more patient data become available. Preliminary data also remain subject to audit and verification procedures that may result in the final data being materially different from the preliminary data we previously published. As a result, interim and preliminary data should be viewed with caution until the final data are available. Material adverse changes between preliminary or interim data and final data could significantly harm our business prospects.
If our product candidates advance into clinical trials, we may experience difficulties in managing our growth and expanding our operations.
Thus far, we have only advanced nedosiran, RG6346, and belcesiran into clinical development. As a result, compared to larger pharmaceutical companies, we have relatively limited experience in drug development and with clinical trials of product candidates. As our product candidates enter and advance through preclinical studies and clinical trials, we will need to expand our development, regulatory, and manufacturing capabilities or contract with other organizations to provide these capabilities for us or otherwise partner with other companies for the advancement of such product candidates. In the future, we expect to have to manage additional relationships with collaborators, CROs, clinical trial sites, investigators, suppliers, and other firms. Our ability to manage our operations and future growth will require us to continue to improve our operational, financial, and management controls, reporting systems, and procedures. We may not be able to implement improvements to our management information and control systems in an efficient or timely manner and may discover deficiencies in existing systems and controls.
We or our collaborative partners may conduct clinical trials for product candidates outside of the U.S., and the FDA and comparable foreign regulatory authorities may not accept data from such trials.
We or our collaborative partners may in the future choose to conduct one or more clinical trials outside the U.S., including in Europe. For instance, our clinical trials of nedosiran, RG6346, and belcesiran each include subjects outside of the U.S. The acceptance of study data from clinical trials conducted outside of the U.S. or another jurisdiction by the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authority may be subject to certain conditions or may not be accepted at all. In cases where data from foreign clinical trials are intended to serve as the sole basis for marketing approval in the U.S., the FDA will generally not approve the application on the basis of foreign data alone unless (i) the data are applicable to the U.S. population and U.S. medical practice; (ii) the trials were performed by clinical investigators of recognized competence and pursuant to Good Clinical Practices (“GCP”) regulations; and (iii) the data may be considered valid without the need for an ongoing site inspection by the FDA or, if the FDA considers such an inspection to be necessary, the FDA is able to validate the data through an on-site inspection or other appropriate means. Additionally, the FDA’s clinical trial requirements, including sufficient size of patient populations and statistical powering, must be met. Many foreign regulatory authorities have similar approval requirements. In addition, such foreign trials would be subject to the applicable local laws of the foreign jurisdictions where the trials are conducted. There can be no assurance that the FDA or any comparable foreign regulatory authority will accept data from trials conducted outside of the U.S. or the applicable international jurisdiction. If the FDA or any comparable foreign regulatory authority does not accept such data, it would result in the need for additional trials, which would be costly and time-consuming and delay aspects of our business plan, and which may result in product candidates that we may develop not receiving approval or clearance for commercialization in the applicable jurisdiction.
If any of our product candidates are approved for marketing and commercialization and we are unable to develop sales, marketing, and distribution capabilities on our own or enter into agreements with third parties to perform these functions on acceptable terms, we will be unable to successfully commercialize any such future products.
We currently have limited sales, marketing, or distribution capabilities or experience. If any of our product candidates are approved, we will need to significantly expand and implement sales, marketing, and distribution capabilities to commercialize such products, which would be expensive and time-consuming, or enter into collaborations with third parties to perform these services. If we decide to market our products directly, we will need to commit significant financial, legal, and managerial resources to develop a marketing and sales force with technical expertise and supporting distribution, administration, and compliance capabilities. If we rely on third parties with such capabilities to market our approved products or decide to co-promote products with collaborators, we will need to establish and maintain marketing and distribution arrangements with third parties, and there can be no assurance that we will be able to enter into such arrangements on acceptable, compliant terms, or at all. In entering into third-party marketing or distribution arrangements, any commercial revenue we receive will depend upon the efforts of the third parties and there can be no assurance that such third parties will establish adequate sales and distribution capabilities or be successful in gaining market acceptance of any approved product. If we are not successful in commercializing any product approved in the future, either on our own or through third parties, our business, financial condition, results of operations, and prospects could be materially and adversely affected.
If we fail to comply with U.S. and foreign regulatory requirements, regulatory authorities could limit or withdraw any marketing or commercialization approvals we may receive and subject us to other penalties that could materially harm our business.
We, our product candidates, our suppliers, and our contract manufacturers, distributors, and contract testing laboratories are subject to extensive regulation by governmental authorities in the EU, the U.S., and other countries, with the regulations differing from country to country.
Even if we receive marketing and commercialization approval of a product candidate, we and our third-party service providers will be subject to continuing regulatory requirements, including a broad array of regulations related to establishment registration and product listing, manufacturing processes, risk management measures, quality and pharmacovigilance systems, post-approval clinical studies, labeling, advertising and promotional activities, record keeping, distribution, adverse event reporting, import and export of pharmaceutical products, pricing, sales and marketing, and fraud and abuse requirements. We are required to submit safety and other post-market information and reports and are subject to continuing regulatory review, including in relation to adverse patient experiences with the product and clinical results that are reported after a product is made commercially available, both in the U.S. and any foreign jurisdiction in which we seek regulatory approval. The FDA and certain foreign regulatory authorities, such as the EMA, have significant post-market authority, including the authority to require labeling changes based on new safety information and to require post-market studies or clinical trials to evaluate safety risks related to the use of a product or to require withdrawal of the product from the market. The FDA also has the authority to require a risk evaluation and mitigation strategy (“REMS”) plan after approval, which may impose further requirements or restrictions on the distribution or use of an approved drug. The EMA now routinely requires risk management plans (“RMPs”) as part of the marketing authorization application process, and such plans must be continually modified and updated throughout the lifetime of the product as new information becomes available. In addition, for nationally authorized medicinal products, the relevant governmental authority of any EU Member State can request an RMP whenever there is a concern about a risk affecting the benefit risk balance of the product. The manufacturer and manufacturing facilities we use to make a future product, if any, will also be subject to periodic review and inspection by the FDA and other regulatory agencies, including for continued compliance with cGMP requirements. The discovery of any new or previously unknown problems with our third-party manufacturers, manufacturing processes, or facilities may result in restrictions on the product, manufacturer, or facility, including withdrawal of the product from the market. If we rely on third-party manufacturers, we will not have control over compliance with applicable rules and regulations by such manufacturers. Any product promotion and advertising will also be subject to regulatory requirements and continuing regulatory review. If we or our collaborators, manufacturers, or service providers fail to comply with applicable continuing regulatory requirements in the U.S. or foreign jurisdictions in which we seek to market our products, we or they may be subject to, among other things, fines, warning and untitled letters, clinical holds, delay or refusal by the FDA or foreign regulatory authorities to approve pending applications or supplements to approved applications, suspension, refusal to renew or withdrawal of regulatory approval, product recalls, seizures or administrative detention of products, refusal to permit the import or export of products, operating restrictions, inability to participate in government programs including Medicare and Medicaid, and total or partial suspension of production or distribution, injunction, restitution, disgorgement, debarment, civil penalties, and criminal prosecution.
We face risks arising from the results of the public referendum held in the United Kingdom and its subsequent withdrawal from the European Union.
On June 23, 2016, the United Kingdom (“UK”) held a referendum in which a majority of the eligible members of the electorate voted to leave the EU. The UK’s withdrawal from the EU is commonly referred to as Brexit. Pursuant to Article 50 of the Treaty on European Union, the UK ceased being a Member State of the EU on January 31, 2020. The implementation period began February 1, 2020 and continued until December 31, 2020. In December 2020, the UK and the EU agreed on a trade and cooperation agreement, under which the EU and the UK will now form two separate markets governed by two distinct regulatory and legal regimes. The trade and cooperation agreement covers the general objectives and framework of the relationship between the UK and EU, including as it relates to trade, transport, and visas. Depending on the application of the terms of the trade and cooperation agreement, we could face new regulatory costs and challenges. The effects of Brexit are currently uncertain, including with respect to financial laws and regulations, tax and free trade agreements, intellectual property rights, data protection laws, supply chain logistics, environmental, health, and safety laws and regulations, medicine licensing and regulations, immigration laws, and employment laws. This lack of clarity on future UK laws and regulations and their interaction with EU laws and regulations may negatively impact foreign direct investment in the UK, increase costs, depress economic activity, and restrict access to capital. The uncertainty concerning the UK’s legal, political, and economic relationship with the EU after Brexit may be a source of instability in the international markets, create significant currency fluctuations, and/or otherwise adversely affect trading agreements or similar cross-border co-operation arrangements (whether economic, tax, fiscal, legal, regulatory, or otherwise) beyond the date of Brexit. We have a subsidiary located in the UK, which we established in order to allow us to conduct clinical trials in EU member states. While we have begun to transition our subsidiaries in Ireland and in Germany to support activities in the EU, there can be no assurance that we will not experience disruptions or other operational challenges in connection with such transition.
These developments may have a significant adverse effect on global economic conditions and the stability of global financial markets and could significantly reduce global market liquidity and limit the ability of key market participants to operate in certain financial markets. In particular, it could also lead to a period of considerable uncertainty in relation to the UK financial and banking markets, as well as on the regulatory process in Europe. Asset valuations, currency exchange rates, and credit ratings may also be subject to increased market volatility.
In addition, if other EU Member States pursue withdrawal, barrier-free access between the other EU Member States or among the European Economic Area (“EEA”) overall could be diminished or eliminated. The long-term effects of Brexit will depend on how the terms of the TCA take effect in practice and on any further agreements (or lack thereof) between the UK and the EU.
Such a withdrawal from the EU is unprecedented, and it is unclear how the restrictions on the UK’s access to the European single market for goods, capital, services, and labor within the EU, or single market, and the wider commercial, legal, and regulatory environment, will impact our current and future operations (including business activities conducted by third parties and contract manufacturers on our behalf) and clinical activities in the UK. In addition to the foregoing, our UK operations support our current and future operations and clinical activities in other countries in the EU and the EEA, and these operations and clinical activities could be disrupted by Brexit.
We may also face new regulatory costs and challenges that could have an adverse effect on our operations. Now that the UK has left the EU, the UK will lose the benefits of global trade agreements negotiated by the EU on behalf of its members, which may result in increased trade barriers that could make our doing business in the EU and the EEA more difficult. Furthermore, Great Britain will now no longer be covered by the centralized procedures for obtaining EEA-wide marketing and manufacturing authorizations from the EMA (under the Northern Irish Protocol, centralized marketing authorizations will continue to be recognized in Northern Ireland) and a separate process for authorization of drug products will be required in Great Britain, resulting in an authorization covering the UK or Great Britain only. Brexit has created economic uncertainty surrounding the terms of Brexit and its consequences could adversely impact customer confidence resulting in customers reducing their spending budgets on our solutions, which could adversely affect our business, revenue, financial condition, results of operations, and could adversely affect the market price of our common shares.
Price controls imposed in foreign markets and downward pricing pressure in the U.S. may adversely affect our future profitability.
In some countries, particularly member states of the EU, the pricing of prescription drugs may be subject to governmental control, at national as well as at regional levels. In these countries, pricing negotiations with governmental authorities can take considerable time after receipt of marketing approval for a product. In addition, in the U.S. and elsewhere, there can be considerable pressure by governments and other stakeholders on prices and reimbursement levels, including as part of cost containment measures. Political, economic, and regulatory developments may further complicate pricing and reimbursement negotiations, and pricing negotiations may continue after coverage or reimbursement has been obtained. Reference pricing used by various EU member states and parallel distribution, or arbitrage between low-priced and high-priced member states, can further reduce prices. In some countries, we or our collaborators may be required to conduct a clinical trial or other studies that compare the cost-effectiveness of our RNAi therapeutic candidates to other available therapies in order to obtain or maintain reimbursement or pricing approval. Publication of discounts by third-party payors or authorities may lead to further pressure on the prices or reimbursement levels within the country of publication and other countries. If reimbursement of any product candidate approved for marketing is unavailable or limited in scope or amount, or if pricing is set at unsatisfactory levels, our business, financial condition, results of operations, or prospects could be adversely affected.
Our business entails a significant risk of product liability and our ability to obtain sufficient insurance coverage could harm our business, financial condition, results of operations, or prospects.
Our business exposes us to significant product liability risks inherent in the development, testing, manufacturing, and marketing of therapeutic treatments. Product liability claims could delay or prevent completion of our development programs. If we succeed in marketing products, such claims could result in an investigation by certain regulatory authorities, such as the FDA or foreign regulatory authorities, of the safety and effectiveness of our products, our manufacturing processes and facilities, or our marketing programs and potentially a recall of our products or more serious enforcement action, limitations on the approved indications for which they may be used, or suspension or withdrawal of approvals. Regardless of the merits or eventual outcome, liability claims may also result in decreased demand for our products, injury to our reputation, costs to defend related litigation, a diversion of management’s time and our resources, substantial monetary awards to clinical trial participants or patients, and a decline in our stock price. We currently have product liability insurance that we believe is appropriate for our stage of development and may need to obtain higher levels prior to marketing any of our product candidates. Any insurance we have or may obtain may not provide sufficient coverage against potential liabilities. Furthermore, clinical trial and product liability insurance is becoming increasingly expensive. As a result, we may be unable to obtain sufficient insurance at a reasonable cost to protect us against losses caused by product liability claims that could have a material adverse effect on our business.
Our employees may engage in misconduct or other improper activities, including noncompliance with regulatory standards and requirements, which could have a material adverse effect on our business.
We are exposed to the risk of employee fraud or other misconduct. Misconduct by employees could include, but is not limited to, intentional failures to comply with the FDA or U.S. healthcare laws and regulations or applicable laws, regulations, guidance, or codes of conduct set by foreign governmental authorities or self-regulatory industry organizations; providing accurate information to any governmental authorities such as the FDA; complying with manufacturing standards we may establish; complying with federal and state healthcare fraud and abuse laws and regulations; reporting financial information or data accurately; or disclosing unauthorized activities to us. In particular, sales, marketing, and business arrangements in the healthcare industry are subject to extensive laws, regulations, guidance, and codes of conduct intended to prevent fraud, kickbacks, self-dealing, and other abusive practices. These laws, regulations, guidance, and codes of conduct may restrict or prohibit a wide range of pricing, discounting, marketing and promotion, sales commission, customer incentive programs, business or conduct involving healthcare professionals, and other business arrangements. Employee misconduct could also involve the improper use of information obtained in the course of clinical trials, which could result in regulatory sanctions, including debarment or disqualification of those employees from participation in FDA-regulated activities, and serious harm to our reputation. It is not always possible to identify and deter employee misconduct, and any precautions we take to detect and prevent this activity may not be effective in controlling unknown or unmanaged risks or losses or in protecting us from governmental investigations or other actions or lawsuits stemming from a failure to be in compliance with such laws, regulations, guidance, or codes of conduct. If any such actions are instituted against us, and we are not successful in defending ourselves or asserting our rights, those actions could have a significant impact on our business, including the imposition of significant fines, exclusion from government programs, or other sanctions.
Our internal computer systems, or those of third parties with which we do business, including our CROs or other contractors or consultants, may fail or suffer security breaches, which could result in a material disruption of our product development programs or the theft of Company or patient confidential information.
Despite the implementation of security measures, our internal computer systems and those of third parties with which we do business, including our CROs and other contractors and consultants, are vulnerable to damage from computer viruses, unauthorized access, natural disasters, terrorism, war, and telecommunication and electrical failures. Such events, as well as power outages, natural disasters (including extreme weather), terrorist attacks, phishing or ransomware attacks, or other similar events, could cause interruptions of our operations.
In the ordinary course of our business, we collect and store sensitive data, including, among other things, legally protected patient health information, personally identifiable information about our employees, intellectual property, and proprietary business information. We manage and maintain our applications and data utilizing on-site systems and outsourced vendors. These applications and data encompass a wide variety of business-critical information, including research and development information, commercial information, and business and financial information. Because information systems, networks, and other technologies are critical to many of our operating activities, shutdowns or service disruptions at our company or vendors that provide information systems, networks, or other services to us pose increasing risks. Such disruptions may be caused by events such as computer hacking, phishing attacks, ransomware, dissemination of computer viruses, worms, and other destructive or disruptive software, denial of service attacks and other malicious activity, as well as power outages, natural disasters (including extreme weather), terrorist attacks or other similar events. Such events could have an adverse impact on us and our business, including loss of data and damage to equipment and data. In addition, system redundancy may be ineffective or inadequate, and our disaster recovery planning may not be sufficient to cover all eventualities. Significant events could result in a disruption of our operations, damage to our reputation, or a loss of revenues. In addition, we may not have adequate insurance coverage to compensate for any losses associated with such events. For instance, the loss of preclinical data or data from any future clinical trial involving our product candidates could result in delays in our development and regulatory filing efforts and significantly increase our costs.
We could be subject to risks caused by misappropriation, misuse, leakage, falsification or intentional or accidental release or loss of information maintained in the information systems and networks of our company and our vendors, including personal information of our employees and patients, and company and vendor confidential data. In addition, outside parties may attempt to penetrate our systems or those of our vendors or fraudulently induce our personnel or the personnel of our vendors to disclose sensitive information in order to gain access to our data and/or systems. We may experience threats to our data and systems, including malicious codes and viruses, phishing, and other cyber-attacks. The number and complexity of these threats continue to increase over time. If a material breach of our information technology systems or those of our vendors occurs, the market perception of its effectiveness of our security measures could be harmed and our reputation and credibility could be damaged. We could be required to expend significant amounts of money and other resources to repair or replace information systems or networks. Certain data breaches must also be reported to affected individuals and the government, and in some cases to the media, under provisions of the U.S. federal Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (“HIPAA”), as amended by the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act (“HITECH”), other U.S. federal and state law, and requirements of non-U.S. jurisdictions, including the General Data Protection Regulation (“GDPR”), and financial penalties may also apply. To the extent that any disruption or security breach were to result in a loss of, or damage to, internal computer systems, or those used by our CROs or other independent organizations, advisors, contractors or consultants, our data, or inappropriate disclosure of confidential or proprietary information of the Company or patients, we could incur liability, reputational harm, and the development of our product candidates could be delayed.
In addition, we could be subject to regulatory actions and/or claims made by individuals and groups in private litigation involving privacy issues related to data collection and use practices and other data privacy laws and regulations, including claims for misuse or inappropriate disclosure of data, as well as unfair or deceptive practices. Although we develop and maintain systems and controls designed to prevent these events from occurring, and we have a process to identify and mitigate threats, the development and maintenance of these systems, controls, and processes is costly and requires ongoing monitoring and updating as technologies change and efforts to overcome security measures become increasingly sophisticated. Moreover, despite our efforts, the possibility of these events occurring cannot be eliminated entirely. As we outsource more of our information systems to vendors, engage in more electronic transactions with payors and patients, and rely more on cloud-based information systems, the related security risks will increase and we may need to expend additional resources to protect our technology and information systems. In addition, there can be no assurance that our internal information technology systems or those of our third-party contractors, or our consultants’ efforts to implement adequate security and control measures, will be sufficient to protect us against breakdowns, service disruption, data deterioration or loss in the event of a system malfunction, or prevent data from being stolen or corrupted in the event of a cyberattack, security breach, industrial espionage attacks, or insider threat attacks which could result in financial, legal, business, or reputational harm.
If we do not comply with laws regulating the protection of the environment and health and human safety, our business could be adversely affected.
Our research, development, and manufacturing involve the use of hazardous materials and various chemicals. We maintain quantities of various flammable and toxic chemicals in our facility in Lexington, Massachusetts, that are required for our research, development, and manufacturing activities. We are subject to federal, state, and local laws and regulations governing the use, manufacture, storage, handling, and disposal of these hazardous materials. We believe our procedures for storing, handling, and disposing these materials in our Lexington facility comply with the relevant guidelines of Lexington, the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration of the U.S. Department of Labor. Although we believe that our safety procedures for handling and disposing of these materials comply with the standards mandated by applicable regulations, the risk of accidental contamination or injury from these materials cannot be eliminated. If an accident occurs, we could be held liable for resulting damages, which could be substantial. We are also subject to numerous environmental, health, and workplace safety laws and regulations, including those governing laboratory procedures, exposure to blood-borne pathogens, and the handling of animals and biohazardous materials. Although we maintain workers’ compensation insurance to cover us for costs and expenses we may incur due to injuries to our employees resulting from the use of these materials, this insurance may not provide adequate coverage against potential liabilities. We do not maintain insurance for environmental liability or toxic tort claims that may be asserted against us in connection with our storage or disposal of biological or hazardous materials. Additional federal, state, and local laws and regulations affecting our operations may be adopted in the future. We may incur substantial costs to comply with, and substantial fines or penalties if we violate, any of these laws or regulations.
Our information technology systems could face serious disruptions that could adversely affect our business.
Despite the use of cloud-based information storage systems and services for certain key corporate information, our internal information technology and other infrastructure systems, including corporate firewalls, servers, leased lines, and connection to the Internet, face the risk of systemic failure that could disrupt our operations. A significant disruption in the availability of our information technology and other internal infrastructure systems could cause interruptions in our collaborations and delays in our research and development work. While we qualify and seek to ensure all information technology systems and services that we utilize have appropriate cybersecurity and operations controls, we are dependent on third parties to assure their operations meet our information technology requirements.
Our current operations are largely concentrated in one location and any events affecting this location may have material adverse consequences.
Our current operations are carried out primarily in our facility located in Lexington, Massachusetts. Any unplanned event, such as flood, fire, explosion, earthquake, extreme weather condition, medical epidemics, power shortage, telecommunication failure, or other natural or manmade accidents, or incidents that prevent us from fully utilizing the facilities, may have a material adverse effect on our ability to operate our business, particularly on a daily basis, and have significant negative consequences on our financial and operating conditions. Loss of access to these facilities may result in increased costs, delays in the development of our product candidates, or interruption of our business operations. As part of our risk management policy, we maintain insurance coverage at levels that we believe are appropriate for our business. However, in the event of an accident or incident at these facilities, we cannot assure you that the amounts of insurance will be sufficient to satisfy any damages and losses. If our facilities are unable to operate because of an accident or incident or for any other reason, even for a short period of time, any or all of our research and development programs may be harmed. Any business interruption may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial position, results of operations, and prospects.
Our ability to utilize our net operating loss carryforwards and certain other tax attributes may be limited.
We have incurred substantial losses during our history, do not expect to become profitable for the foreseeable future, and may never achieve profitability. To the extent that we continue to generate taxable losses, unused losses will carry forward to offset future taxable income, if any, until such unused losses expire. We may be unable to use these losses to offset income before such unused losses expire. Under Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, if a corporation undergoes an “ownership change,” which is generally defined as a greater than 50 percentage point change by value in its equity ownership over a three-year period, the corporation’s ability to use its pre-change net operating loss carryforwards and other pre-change tax attributes to offset its post-change income may be further limited. We have performed an analysis on whether we have experienced any ownership changes in the past. Our analysis to date indicates that we experienced ownership changes in November 2007, October 2010, February 2014, and March 2018. Our net operating losses are subject to such limitation. As of December 31, 2020, we continue to have significant U.S. federal and Massachusetts net operating loss carryforwards that could be reduced or lost if we experience any further ownership changes, which could have an adverse effect on our business, financial position, results of operations, and prospects.
The investment of our cash, cash equivalents, and held-to-maturity investments is subject to risks which may cause losses and affect the liquidity of these investments.
As of December 31, 2020, we had $568.8 million in cash, cash equivalents, and held-to-maturity investments. We historically have invested substantially all of our available cash and cash equivalents in corporate bonds, commercial paper, securities issued by the U.S. government, certificates of deposit, and money market funds meeting the criteria of our investment policy, which is focused on the preservation of our capital. These investments are subject to general credit, liquidity, market, and interest rate risks. For example, the impact of U.S. sub-prime mortgage defaults in recent years affected various sectors of the financial markets and caused credit and liquidity issues. We may realize losses in the fair value of these investments or a complete loss of these investments, which would have a negative effect on our consolidated financial statements.
In addition, should our investments cease paying or reduce the amount of interest paid to us, our interest income would suffer. The market risks associated with our investment portfolio may have an adverse effect on our results of operations, liquidity, and financial condition.
Changes in accounting rules and regulations, or interpretations thereof, could result in unfavorable accounting charges or require us to change our compensation policies.
Accounting methods and policies for public companies and biopharmaceutical companies, including policies governing revenue recognition, research and development and related expenses, and accounting for stock-based compensation, are subject to review, interpretation, and guidance from our auditors and relevant accounting authorities, including the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Changes to accounting methods or policies, or interpretations thereof, may require us to reclassify, restate, or otherwise change or revise our consolidated financial statements, including those contained in our Annual Reports on Form 10-K.
Risks Related to Intellectual Property
If we are not able to obtain and enforce patent protection for our technologies or product candidates, development and commercialization of our product candidates may be adversely affected.
Our success depends in part on our ability to obtain and maintain patents and other forms of intellectual property rights, including in-licenses of intellectual property rights of others, for our product candidates, methods used to manufacture our product candidates and methods for treating patients using our product candidates, as well as our ability to preserve our trade secrets, to prevent third parties from infringing upon our proprietary rights, and to operate without infringing upon the proprietary rights of others. There can be no assurance that an issued patent will remain valid and enforceable in a court of law through the entire patent term. Should the validity of a patent be challenged, the legal process associated with defending the patent may be costly and time consuming. Issued patents can be subject to oppositions, interferences, post-grant proceedings, and other third-party challenges that can result in the revocation of the patent or limit patent claims such that patent coverage lacks sufficient breadth to protect subject matter that is commercially relevant. Competitors may be able to circumvent our patents. Development and commercialization of pharmaceutical products can be subject to substantial delays and it is possible that at the time of commercialization any patent covering the product will have expired or will be in force for only a short period of time thereafter.
As of December 31, 2020, our worldwide patent estate, not including the patents and patent applications that we have licensed from third parties, included more than 90 issued patents or allowed patent applications and over 250 pending patent applications supporting commercial development of our RNAi molecules and delivery technologies. We may not be able to apply for patents on certain aspects of our product candidates or delivery technologies in a timely fashion or at all. Our existing issued and granted patents and any future patents we obtain may not be sufficiently broad to prevent others from using our technology or from developing competing products and technology. There is no guarantee that any of our pending patent applications will result in issued or granted patents, that any of our issued or granted patents will not later be found to be invalid or unenforceable, or that any issued or granted patents will include claims that are sufficiently broad to cover our product candidates or delivery technologies or to provide meaningful protection from our competitors. Moreover, the patent position of biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies can be highly uncertain because it involves complex legal and factual questions. We will be able to protect our proprietary rights from unauthorized use by third parties only to the extent that our current and future proprietary technology and product candidates are covered by valid and enforceable patents or are effectively maintained as trade secrets. If third parties disclose or misappropriate our proprietary rights, it may materially and adversely impact our position in the market.
The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) and various foreign governmental patent agencies require compliance with a number of procedural, documentary, fee payment, and other provisions during the patent process. There are situations in which noncompliance can result in abandonment or lapse of a patent or patent application, resulting in partial or complete loss of patent rights in the relevant jurisdiction. In such an event, competitors might be able to enter the market earlier than would otherwise have been the case. The standards applied by the USPTO and foreign patent offices in granting patents are not always applied uniformly or predictably. For example, there is no uniform worldwide policy regarding patentable subject matter or the scope of claims allowable in biotechnology and pharmaceutical patents. As such, we do not know the degree of future protection that we will have on our proprietary products and technology. While we will endeavor to protect our product candidates with intellectual property rights such as patents, as appropriate, the process of obtaining patents is time-consuming, expensive, and sometimes unpredictable.
In addition, there are numerous recent changes to the patent laws and proposed changes to the rules of the USPTO which may have a significant impact on our ability to protect our technology and enforce our intellectual property rights. The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled on several patent cases in recent years, some of which either narrow the scope of patent protection available in certain circumstances or weaken the rights of patent owners in certain situations. The 2013 decision by the U.S. Supreme Court in Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics, Inc. precludes a claim to a nucleic acid having a stated nucleotide sequence which is identical to a sequence found in nature and unmodified. We currently are not aware of an immediate impact of this decision on our patents or patent applications because we are developing nucleic acid products that are not found in nature. However, this decision has yet to be clearly interpreted by courts and by the USPTO. We cannot assure you that the interpretations of this decision or subsequent rulings will not adversely impact our patents or patent applications. In addition to increasing uncertainty with regard to our ability to obtain patents in the future, this combination of events has created uncertainty with respect to the value of patents, once obtained. Depending on decisions by the U.S. Congress, the federal courts, and the USPTO, the laws and regulations governing U.S. patents could change in unpredictable ways that would weaken our ability to obtain new patents or to enforce our existing patents and patents that we might obtain in the future.
Once granted, patents may remain open to opposition, interference, re-examination, post-grant review, inter partes review, nullification or derivation action in court or before patent offices or similar proceedings for a given period before or after allowance or grant, during which time third parties can raise objections against such initial grant. In the course of such proceedings, which may continue for a protracted period of time, the patent owner may be compelled to limit the scope of the allowed or granted claims thus attacked or may lose the allowed or granted claims altogether. Our patent risks include that:
•others may, or may be able to, make, use, or sell compounds that are the same as or similar to our product candidates but that are not covered by the claims of the patents that we own or license;
•we or our licensors, collaborators, or any future collaborators may not be the first to file patent applications covering certain aspects of our inventions;
•others may independently develop similar or alternative technologies or duplicate any of our technologies without infringing our intellectual property rights;
•a third party may challenge our patents, and, if challenged, a court may not hold that our patents are valid, enforceable, and infringed;
•a third party may challenge our patents in various patent offices, and, if challenged, we may be compelled to limit the scope of our allowed or granted claims or lose the allowed or granted claims altogether;
•any issued patents that we own or have licensed from others may not provide us with any competitive advantages, or may be challenged by third parties;
•we may not develop additional proprietary technologies that are patentable;
•the patents of others could harm our business; and
•our competitors could conduct research and development activities in countries where we will not have enforceable patent rights and then use the information learned from such activities to develop competitive products for sale in our major commercial markets.
Intellectual property rights of third parties could adversely affect our ability to commercialize our product candidates, and we might be required to litigate or obtain licenses from third parties in order to develop or market our product candidates. Such litigation could be costly and licenses may be unavailable on commercially reasonable terms.
Research and development of RNAi-based therapeutics and other oligonucleotide-based therapeutics has resulted in many patents and patent applications from organizations and individuals seeking to obtain patent protection in the field. Our efforts are based on RNAi technology that we have licensed and that we have developed internally and own or co-own. We have chosen this approach to increase our likelihood of technical success and our freedom to operate. We have obtained grants and issuances of RNAi-based patents and have licensed other patents from third parties on exclusive and non-exclusive bases. The issued patents and pending patent applications in the U.S. and in key markets around the world that we own, co-own, or license claim many different methods, compositions, and processes relating to the discovery, development, manufacture, and commercialization of RNAi therapeutics. Specifically, we own, co-own, or have licensed a portfolio of patents, patent applications, and other intellectual property covering: (1) certain aspects of the structure and uses of RNAi molecules, including their manufacture and use as therapeutics, and RNAi-related mechanisms, (2) chemical modifications to RNAi molecules that improve their properties and suitability for therapeutic uses, (3) RNAi molecules directed to specific gene sequences and drug targets as treatments for particular diseases, and (4) delivery technologies, such as in the field of lipid nanoparticles and lipid nanoparticle formulation, and chemical modifications such as conjugation to targeting moieties.
The RNAi-related intellectual property landscape, including patent applications in prosecution where no definitive claims have yet issued, is still evolving, and it is difficult to conclusively assess our freedom to operate. Other companies are pursuing patent applications and possess issued patents broadly directed to RNAi compositions, methods of making and using RNAi, and to RNAi-related delivery and modification technologies. Our competitive position may suffer if patents issued to third parties cover our products, or our manufacture or uses relevant to our commercialization plans. In such cases, we may not be in a position to commercialize products unless we enter into a license agreement with the intellectual property right holder, if available, on commercially reasonable terms or successfully pursue litigation, opposition, interference, re-examination, post-grant review, inter partes review, nullification, derivation action, or cancellation proceeding to limit, nullify, or invalidate the third-party intellectual property right concerned. Even if we are successful in limiting, nullifying, or invalidating third-party intellectual property rights through such proceedings, we may incur substantial costs and could require significant time and attention of our personnel.
Patent applications in the U.S. and elsewhere are generally published approximately 18 months after the earliest filing for which priority is claimed, with such earliest filing date being commonly referred to as the priority date. Therefore, patent applications covering our product candidates or platform technology could have been filed by others without our knowledge. Additionally, pending claims in patent applications which have been published can, subject to certain limitations, be later amended in a manner that could cover our platform technologies, our product candidates, or the use of our product candidates. Third-party intellectual property right holders may also bring patent infringement claims against us. No such patent infringement actions have been brought against us. We cannot guarantee that we will be able to successfully settle or otherwise resolve any future infringement claims. If we are unable to successfully settle future claims on terms acceptable to us, we may be required to engage in or continue costly, unpredictable, and time-consuming litigation, and may be prevented from or experience substantial delays in marketing our products. If we fail in any such dispute, in addition to being forced to pay damages, we may be temporarily or permanently prohibited from commercializing any of our product candidates that are held to be infringing. We might also be forced to redesign product candidates so that we no longer infringe the third-party intellectual property rights. Any of these events, even if we were ultimately to prevail, could require us to divert substantial financial and management resources that we would otherwise be able to devote to our business.
As the field of RNAi therapeutics matures, patent applications are being processed by national patent offices around the world. There is uncertainty about which patents they will issue, and, if they do, as to when, to whom, and with what claims. It is likely that there will be significant litigation in the courts and other proceedings, such as interferences, re-examinations, oppositions, post-grant reviews, inter partes reviews, nullifications, derivation actions, or cancellation proceedings, in various patent offices relating to patent rights in the RNAi therapeutics field. In many cases, the possibility of appeal or opposition exists for either us or our opponents, and it may be years before final, unappealable rulings are made with respect to these patents in certain jurisdictions. The timing and outcome of these and other proceedings is uncertain and may adversely affect our business if we are not successful in defending the patentability and scope of our pending and issued patent claims or if third parties are successful in obtaining claims that cover our RNAi technology or any of our product candidates. In addition, third parties may attempt to invalidate our intellectual property rights. Even if our rights are not directly challenged, disputes could lead to the weakening of our intellectual property rights. Our defense against any attempt by third parties to circumvent or invalidate our intellectual property rights could be costly to us, could require significant time and attention of our management, and could have a material adverse effect on our business and our ability to successfully compete in the field of RNAi therapeutics.
There are many issued and pending patents that claim aspects of oligonucleotide chemistry and modifications that we may need to apply to our therapeutic candidates. There are also many issued patents that claim targeting genes or portions of genes that may be relevant for drugs we wish to develop. Thus, it is possible that one or more organizations will hold patent rights to which we will need a license. If those organizations refuse to grant us a license to such patent rights on reasonable terms, we may be unable to market products or perform research and development or other activities covered by these patents.
We may license patent rights from third-party owners or licensees. If such owners or licensees do not properly or successfully obtain, maintain, or enforce the patents underlying such licenses, or if they retain or license to others any competing rights, our competitive position and business prospects may be adversely affected.
We may, in the future, rely on intellectual property rights licensed from third parties to protect our technology, including licenses that give us rights to third-party intellectual property that is necessary or useful for our business. We also may license additional third-party intellectual property in the future. Our success may depend in part on the ability of our licensors to obtain, maintain, and enforce patent protection for our licensed intellectual property, in particular, those patents to which we have secured exclusive rights. Our licensors may not successfully prosecute the patent applications licensed to us. Even if patents issue or are granted, our licensors may fail to maintain these patents, such patents may have claim breadth coverage insufficient to protect our interests, may determine not to pursue litigation against other companies that are infringing these patents, or may pursue litigation less aggressively than we would. Further, we may not obtain exclusive rights, which would allow for third parties to develop competing products. Without protection for, or exclusive right to, the intellectual property we license, other companies might be able to offer substantially identical products for sale, which could adversely affect our competitive business position and harm our business prospects. In addition, we sublicense certain of our rights under our third-party licenses to BI and Alnylam and may sublicense such rights to current or future collaborators. Any impairment of these sublicensed rights could result in reduced revenue under our collaboration agreements with BI and Alnylam or result in termination of an agreement by one or more of our existing or any other future collaborators.
We may be unable to protect our intellectual property rights throughout the world.
Obtaining a valid and enforceable issued or granted patent covering our technology in the U.S. and worldwide can be extremely costly. In jurisdictions where we have not obtained patent protection, competitors may use our technology to develop their own products, and further, may export otherwise infringing products to territories where we have patent protection, but where it is more difficult to enforce a patent compared to the U.S. We also may face competition in jurisdictions where we do not have issued or granted patents or where our issued or granted patent claims or other intellectual property rights are not sufficient to prevent competitor activities in these jurisdictions. The legal systems of certain countries, particularly certain developing countries, make it difficult to enforce patents and such countries may not recognize other types of intellectual property protection, particularly that relating to biopharmaceuticals. This could make it difficult for us to prevent the infringement of our patents or marketing of competing products in violation of our proprietary rights generally in certain jurisdictions. Proceedings to enforce our patent rights in foreign jurisdictions could result in substantial cost and divert our efforts and attention from other aspects of our business.
We generally file a provisional patent application first (a priority filing) at the USPTO. A U.S. utility application and/or international application under the Patent Cooperation Treaty (“PCT”) are usually filed within 12 months after the priority filing. Based on the PCT filing, national and regional patent applications may be filed in the EU, Japan, Australia, and Canada and, depending on the individual case, also in any or all of, inter alia, China, India, South Korea, Singapore, Taiwan, and South Africa. We have so far not filed for patent protection in all national and regional jurisdictions where such protection may be available. In addition, we may decide to abandon national and regional patent applications before grant. Finally, the grant proceeding of each national or regional patent is an independent proceeding which may lead to situations in which applications might be refused in some jurisdictions, while granted by others. Depending on the country, various scopes of patent protection may be granted on the same product candidate or technology.
The laws of some jurisdictions do not protect intellectual property rights to the same extent as the laws in the U.S., and many companies have encountered significant difficulties in protecting and defending such rights in such jurisdictions. These difficulties could impact the future commercialization of our hepatitis B virus infection product candidate because a substantial share of the global market is in non-Western countries. If we or our licensors encounter difficulties in protecting, or are otherwise precluded from effectively protecting, the intellectual property rights important for our business in such jurisdictions, the value of these rights may be diminished and we may face additional competition from others in those jurisdictions. Many countries have compulsory licensing laws under which a patent owner may be compelled to grant licenses to third parties. In addition, many countries limit the enforceability of patents against government agencies or government contractors. In these countries, the patent owner may have limited remedies, which could materially diminish the value of such patent. If we or any of our licensors are forced to grant a license to third parties with respect to any patents relevant to our business, our competitive position in the relevant jurisdiction may be impaired and our business and results of operations may be adversely affected.
We, our licensors, or existing or future collaborators may become subject to third-party claims or litigation alleging infringement of patents or other proprietary rights or seeking to invalidate patents or other proprietary rights, and we may need to resort to litigation to protect or enforce our patents or other proprietary rights, all of which could be costly, time consuming, delay, or prevent the development and commercialization of our product candidates, or put our patents and other proprietary rights at risk.
We, our licensors, or existing or future collaborators may be subject to third-party claims for infringement or misappropriation of patent or other proprietary rights. We are generally obligated under our license or collaboration agreements to indemnify and hold harmless our licensors or collaborators for damages arising from intellectual property infringement by us. If we, our licensors, or existing or future collaborators are found to infringe a third-party patent or other intellectual property rights, we could be required to pay damages, potentially including treble damages, if we are found to have willfully infringed. In addition, we, our licensors, or existing or future collaborators may choose to seek, or be required to seek, a license from a third party, which may not be available on acceptable terms, if at all. Even if a license can be obtained on acceptable terms, the rights may be non-exclusive, which could give our competitors access to the same technology or intellectual property rights licensed to us. If we fail to obtain a required license, we, our licensors, or existing or future collaborators may be unable to effectively market product candidates based on our technology, which could limit our ability to generate revenue or achieve profitability and possibly prevent us from generating revenue sufficient to sustain our operations. In addition, we may find it necessary to pursue claims or initiate lawsuits to protect or enforce our patent or other intellectual property rights. The cost to us in defending or initiating any litigation or other proceeding relating to patent or other proprietary rights, even if resolved in our favor, could be substantial, and litigation would divert our management’s attention. Some of our competitors may be able to sustain the costs of complex patent litigation more effectively than we can because they have substantially greater resources. Uncertainties resulting from the initiation and continuation of patent litigation or other proceedings could delay our research and development efforts and limit our ability to continue our operations.
If we were to initiate legal proceedings against a third party to enforce a patent covering one of our products or our technology, the defendant could counterclaim that our patent is invalid or unenforceable. In patent litigation in the U.S., defendant counterclaims alleging invalidity or unenforceability are commonplace. Grounds for a validity challenge could be an alleged failure to meet any of several statutory requirements, for example, lack of novelty, obviousness, or non-enablement. Grounds for an unenforceability assertion could be an allegation that someone connected with prosecution of the patent withheld relevant information from the USPTO, or made a misleading statement, during patent prosecution. The outcome following legal assertions of invalidity and unenforceability during patent litigation is unpredictable. With respect to the validity question, for example, we cannot be certain that there is no invalidating prior art, of which we and the patent examiner were unaware during patent prosecution. If a defendant were to prevail on a legal assertion of invalidity or unenforceability, we would lose at least part, and perhaps all, of the patent protection on one or more of our products or certain aspects of our platform technology. Such a loss of patent protection could have a material adverse impact on our business. Patents and other intellectual property rights also will not protect our technology if competitors design around our protected technology without legally infringing our patents or other intellectual property rights.
If we or our collaborative partners fail to comply with our obligations under any license, collaboration, or other agreements, we may be required to pay damages and could lose intellectual property rights that are necessary for developing and protecting our product candidates and delivery technologies, or we could lose certain rights to grant sublicenses.
Any future licenses we enter are likely to impose various development, commercialization, funding, milestone, royalty, diligence, sublicensing, insurance, patent prosecution and enforcement, and other obligations on us or certain of our collaborative partners that receive sublicenses. If we breach any of these obligations, or use the intellectual property licensed to us in an unauthorized manner, we may be required to pay damages, and the licensor may have the right to terminate the license, which could result in us being unable to develop, manufacture, and sell products that are covered by the licensed technology, or enable a competitor to gain access to the licensed technology. Moreover, our licensors may own or control intellectual property that has not been licensed to us and, as a result, we may be subject to claims, regardless of their merit, that we are infringing or otherwise violating the licensor’s rights. In addition, while we cannot currently determine the amount of the royalty obligations we would be required to pay on sales of future products, if any, the amounts may be significant. The amount of our future royalty obligations will depend on the technology and intellectual property we use in products that we successfully develop and commercialize, if any. Therefore, even if we successfully develop and commercialize products, we may be unable to achieve or maintain profitability.
If we are unable to protect the confidentiality of our trade secrets, our business and competitive position would be harmed.
In addition to seeking patent protection for certain aspects of our product candidates and delivery technologies, we also consider trade secrets, including confidential and unpatented know-how, important to the maintenance of our competitive position. We protect trade secrets and confidential and unpatented know-how, in part, by entering into non-disclosure and confidentiality agreements with parties who have access to such knowledge, such as our employees, corporate collaborators, outside scientific collaborators, CROs, contract manufacturers, consultants, advisors, and other third parties. We also enter into confidentiality and invention or patent assignment agreements with our employees and consultants that obligate them to maintain confidentiality and assign their inventions to us. Despite these efforts, any of these parties may breach the agreements and disclose our proprietary information, including our trade secrets, and we may not be able to obtain adequate remedies for such breaches. Enforcing a claim that a party illegally disclosed or misappropriated a trade secret is difficult, expensive, and time-consuming, and the outcome is unpredictable. In addition, some courts in the U.S. and certain foreign jurisdictions are less willing or unwilling to protect trade secrets. If any of our trade secrets were to be lawfully obtained or independently developed by a competitor, we would have no right to prevent them from using that technology or information to compete with us. If any of our trade secrets were to be disclosed to or independently developed by a competitor, our competitive position would be harmed.
We are also subject both in the U.S. and outside the U.S. to various regulatory schemes regarding requests for the information we provide to regulatory authorities, which may include, in whole or in part, trade secrets or confidential commercial information. While we are likely to be notified in advance of any disclosure of such information and would likely object to such disclosure, there can be no assurance that our challenge to the request would be successful.
We may be, in the future, subject to claims that we or our employees or consultants have wrongfully used or disclosed alleged trade secrets of our employees’ or consultants’ former employers or their clients. These claims may be costly to defend and if we do not successfully do so, we may be required to pay monetary damages, may be prohibited from using some of our research and development work, and may lose valuable intellectual property rights or personnel.
Many of our employees were previously employed at universities or biotechnology or pharmaceutical companies, including our competitors or potential competitors. From time to time, we have received correspondence from other companies alleging the improper use or disclosure, or inquiring regarding the use or disclosure, by certain of our employees who have previously been employed elsewhere in our industry, including with our competitors, of their former employer’s trade secrets or other proprietary information. Responding to these allegations can be costly and disruptive to our business, even when the allegations are without merit, and can be a distraction to management.
We may be subject to additional claims in the future that these or other employees of the Company have, or we have, inadvertently or otherwise used or disclosed trade secrets or other proprietary information of their former employers. Litigation may be necessary to defend against these claims. If we fail in defending current or future claims, in addition to paying monetary damages, we may lose valuable intellectual property rights, personnel, or the ability to use some of our research and development work. A loss of intellectual property, key research personnel, or their work product could hamper our ability to commercialize, or prevent us from commercializing, our product candidates, which could severely harm our business.
If our trademarks and trade names are not adequately protected, we may not be able to build name recognition in our markets of interest and our business may be adversely affected.
Our trademarks or trade names may be challenged, infringed, circumvented or declared generic, or determined to be infringing on other marks. Any trademark litigation could be expensive. We may not be able to protect our rights to these trademarks and trade names or may be forced to stop using these names, which we need for name recognition by potential collaborators or customers in our markets of interest. If we are unable to establish name recognition based on our trademarks and trade names, we may not be able to compete effectively, and our business may be adversely affected.
Risks Related to Government Regulation
We may be unable to obtain U.S. or foreign regulatory approval and, as a result, may be unable to commercialize our product candidates.
Our product candidates are subject to extensive governmental regulations relating to, among other things, research, development, testing, manufacture, quality control, approval, labeling, packaging, promotion, storage, record keeping, advertising, distribution, sampling, pricing, sales and marketing, safety, post-approval monitoring and reporting, and export and import of drugs. Rigorous preclinical testing and clinical trials and an extensive regulatory approval process are required to be successfully completed in the U.S. and in many foreign jurisdictions before a new drug can be marketed. Satisfaction of these and other regulatory requirements is costly, time consuming, uncertain, and subject to unanticipated delays. It is possible that none of the product candidates we may develop will obtain the regulatory approvals necessary for us or our collaborators to begin selling them.
We have limited experience in conducting and managing the clinical trials necessary to obtain regulatory approvals, including approval by the FDA as well as foreign regulatory authorities, such as the EMA. The time required to obtain FDA and foreign regulatory approvals is unpredictable but typically takes many years following the commencement of clinical trials, depending upon the type, complexity, and novelty of the product candidate. The standards that the FDA and its foreign counterparts use when regulating us are not always applied predictably or uniformly and can change. Any analysis we perform of data from preclinical and clinical activities is subject to confirmation and interpretation by regulatory authorities, which could delay, limit, or prevent regulatory approval. We may also encounter unexpected delays or increased costs due to new government regulations, for example, from future legislation or administrative action, or from changes in the policy of the FDA or foreign regulatory authorities during the period of product development, clinical trials, and regulatory review by the FDA or foreign regulatory authorities. It is impossible to predict whether legislative changes will be enacted, or whether FDA or foreign laws, regulations, guidance, or interpretations will be changed, or what the impact of such changes, if any, may be.
Any delay or failure in obtaining required approvals could have a material adverse effect on our ability to generate revenues from the particular product candidate for which we are seeking approval. Furthermore, any regulatory approval to market a product may be subject to limitations on the approved uses for which we may market the product or the labeling or other restrictions. Regulatory authorities also may impose requirements for costly post-marketing studies or clinical trials and surveillance to monitor the safety or efficacy of the product. In addition, the FDA has the authority to require a REMS plan as part of an NDA or biologics license application or after approval, which may impose further requirements or restrictions on the distribution or use of an approved drug or biologic, such as limiting prescribing to certain physicians or medical centers that have undergone specialized training, limiting treatment to patients who meet certain safe-use criteria, and requiring treated patients to enroll in a registry. These limitations and restrictions may limit the size of the market for the product and affect coverage and reimbursement by third-party payors.
We are also subject to numerous foreign regulatory requirements governing, among other things, the conduct of clinical trials, manufacturing and marketing authorization, pricing, and third-party reimbursement. The foreign regulatory approval process varies among countries and may include all of the risks associated with FDA approval described above as well as risks attributable to the satisfaction of local regulations in foreign jurisdictions. Moreover, the time required to obtain approval may differ from that required to obtain FDA approval. Approval by the FDA does not ensure approval by regulatory authorities outside the U.S. and vice versa.
If we or current or future collaborators, manufacturers, or service providers fail to comply with healthcare laws and regulations, we or they could be subject to enforcement actions and substantial penalties, which could affect our ability to develop, market, and sell our products, and may harm our reputation.
Although we do not currently have any products on the market, if our therapeutic candidates or clinical trials are covered by federal healthcare programs or other third-party payors, we will be subject to additional healthcare statutory and regulatory requirements and enforcement by the federal, state, and foreign governments of the jurisdictions in which we conduct our business. Healthcare providers, physicians, and third-party payors play a primary role in the recommendation and prescription of any therapeutic candidates for which we may obtain marketing approval. Our future arrangements with third-party payors and customers may expose us to broadly applicable fraud and abuse, transparency, and other healthcare laws and regulations that may constrain the business or financial arrangements and relationships through which we market, sell, and distribute our therapeutic candidates for which we obtain marketing approval. Restrictions under applicable federal and state healthcare laws and regulations include, but are not limited to, the following:
•the federal Anti-Kickback Statute, which prohibits, among other things, persons from knowingly and willfully soliciting, receiving, offering, or providing remuneration, directly or indirectly, overtly or covertly, in cash or in kind, to induce or reward either the referral of an individual for a healthcare item or service, or the purchasing or ordering of an item or service, for which payment may be made, in whole or in part, under a federal healthcare program such as Medicare or Medicaid. This statute has been interpreted to apply to arrangements between pharmaceutical manufacturers on the one hand, and prescribers, purchasers, and formulary managers, among others, on the other. A person or entity does not need to have actual knowledge of the statute or specific intent to violate it in order to have committed a violation. Violations are subject to civil and criminal fines and penalties for each violation, plus up to three times the remuneration involved, imprisonment, and exclusion from government healthcare programs. In addition, the government may assert that a claim including items or services resulting from a violation of the federal Anti-Kickback Statute constitutes a false or fraudulent claim for purposes of the federal False Claims Act or federal civil money penalties;
•the federal civil and criminal false claims laws and civil monetary penalty laws, such as the U.S. federal False Claims Act (“FCA”), which imposes criminal and civil penalties, including through civil whistleblower or qui tam actions, against individuals or entities (including manufacturers) for, among other things, knowingly presenting or causing to be presented, to the federal government, claims for payment that are false or fraudulent, making, using, or causing to be made or used, a false statement or record material to payment of a false or fraudulent claim or obligation to pay or transmit money or property to the federal government; or knowingly concealing or knowingly and improperly avoiding, decreasing, or concealing an obligation to pay money to the federal government. The government may deem manufacturers to have “caused” the submission of false or fraudulent claims by, for example, providing inaccurate billing or coding information to customer or promoting a product off-label. In addition, the government may assert that a claim including items and services resulting from a violation of the federal Anti-Kickback Statute constitutes a false or fraudulent claim for purposes of the FCA;
•HIPAA includes a fraud and abuse provision which imposes criminal and civil liability for knowingly and willfully executing, or attempting to execute, a scheme to defraud any healthcare benefit program (including private payors), or knowingly and willfully falsifying, concealing, or covering up a material fact or making any materially false statement in connection with the delivery of or payment for healthcare benefits, items, or services, regardless of the payor (e.g., public or private). Similar to the federal Anti-Kickback Statute, a person or entity does not need to have actual knowledge of the statute or specific intent to violate it in order to have committed a violation;
•HIPAA, as amended by HITECH, and its implementing regulations, which impose obligations on certain covered entity healthcare providers, health plans, and healthcare clearinghouses, as well as their business associates that perform certain services involving the use or disclosure of individually identifiable health information, including mandatory contractual terms, with respect to safeguarding the privacy, security, and transmission of individually identifiable health information, and require notification to affected individuals and regulatory authorities of certain breaches of security of individually identifiable health information. HITECH also created new tiers of civil monetary penalties, amended HIPAA to make civil and criminal penalties directly applicable to business associates, and gave state attorneys general new authority to file civil actions for damages or injunctions in federal courts to enforce the federal HIPAA laws and seek attorneys’ fees and costs associated with pursuing federal civil actions;
•federal and state consumer protection and unfair competition laws, which broadly regulate marketplace activities and activities that potentially harm consumers;
•the federal false statements statute which prohibits knowingly and willfully falsifying, concealing, or covering up a material fact or making any materially false statement in connection with the delivery of or payment for healthcare benefits, items, or services; similar to the federal Anti-Kickback Statute, a person or entity does not need to have actual knowledge of the statute or specific intent to violate it in order to have committed a violation;
•the federal Physician Payment Sunshine Act created under the Affordable Care Act (“ACA”), and its implementing regulations which require that manufacturers of drugs, biologicals, devices, and medical supplies for which payment is available under Medicare, Medicaid, and Children’s Health Insurance Program (with certain exceptions) report annually to the Department of Health and Human Services information related to payments or other transfers of value made to physicians (defined to include doctors, dentists, optometrists, podiatrists, and chiropractors) and teaching hospitals, as well as ownership and investment interests held by physicians and their immediate family members. Effective January 1, 2022, these reporting obligations will extend to include transfers of value made to certain non-physician providers such as physician assistants and nurse practitioners;
•federal government price reporting laws, which require us to calculate and report complex pricing metrics in an accurate and timely manner to government programs;
•The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act prohibits companies and their intermediaries from making, or offering or promising to make, improper payments to non-U.S. officials for the purpose of obtaining or retaining business or otherwise seeking favorable treatment;
•the EU General Data Protection Regulation (EU) 2016/679, which introduced new data protection requirements in the EU, as well as substantial fines for breaches of the data protection rules as of May 25, 2018. The GDPR enhances data protection obligations for processors and controllers of personal data, including, for example, expanded disclosures about how personal information is to be used, limitations on retention of information, mandatory data breach notification requirements, and onerous new obligations on services providers. Non-compliance with the GDPR may result in monetary penalties of up to €20 million or 4% of worldwide revenue, whichever is higher (note that non-compliance with the UK GDPR may result in monetary penalties of up to £17.5 million or 4% of worldwide revenue, whichever is higher). The GDPR and other changes in laws or regulations associated with the enhanced protection of certain types of personal data, such as healthcare data or other sensitive information, could greatly increase our cost of providing our products and services or even prevent us from offering certain services in jurisdictions in which we operate;
•the California Consumer Privacy Act (“CCPA”), which creates new individual privacy rights for California consumers (as defined in the law) and places increased privacy and security obligations on entities handling personal data of consumers or households. The CCPA requires covered companies to provide certain disclosures to consumers about its data collection, use and sharing practices, and to provide affected California residents with ways to opt out of certain sales or transfers of personal information. The CCPA went into effect on January 1, 2020, and the California Attorney General commenced enforcement actions against violators on July 1, 2020. While there are currently exceptions for protected health information that is subject to HIPAA and clinical trial regulations, as currently written, the CCPA may impact our business activities; and
•federal consumer protection and unfair competition laws, which broadly regulate marketplace activities and activities that potentially harm consumers.
Additionally, we may be subject to analogous state and foreign laws and regulations, such as state anti-kickback and false claims laws potentially applicable to sales or marketing arrangements and claims involving healthcare items or services reimbursed by nongovernmental third-party payors, including private insurers. Further, certain state laws require pharmaceutical manufacturers to comply with the pharmaceutical industry’s voluntary compliance guidelines and the relevant compliance guidance promulgated by the federal government, and may require pharmaceutical manufacturers to report information related to payments to physicians and other healthcare providers or marketing expenditures. There may also be additional state laws that apply to our business which govern the privacy and security of health information in certain circumstances, many of which differ from each other in significant ways and often are not preempted by HIPAA, thus complicating compliance efforts. The approval and commercialization of any of our drug candidates outside the U.S. will also likely subject us to non-U.S. equivalents of the healthcare laws mentioned above, among other non-U.S. laws.
The scope and enforcement of each of these laws is uncertain and subject to rapid change in the current environment of healthcare reform, especially in light of the lack of applicable precedent and regulations. Federal and state enforcement bodies have recently increased their scrutiny of interactions between healthcare companies and healthcare providers, which has led to a number of investigations, prosecutions, convictions, and settlements in the healthcare industry. Responding to investigations can be time and resource-consuming and can divert management’s attention from the business. Any such investigation or settlement could increase our costs or otherwise have an adverse effect on our business.
Ensuring that our business arrangements with third parties comply with applicable healthcare laws and regulations could involve substantial costs. If our operations are found to be in violation of any such requirements, we may be subject to penalties, including civil, criminal, or administrative penalties, imprisonment, monetary damages, the curtailment or restructuring of our operations, or exclusion from participation in government contracting, healthcare reimbursement, or other government programs, including Medicare and Medicaid, any of which could adversely affect our financial results. Although effective compliance programs can mitigate the risk of investigation and prosecution for violations of these laws, these risks cannot be entirely eliminated. Any action against us for an alleged or suspected violation could cause us to incur significant legal expenses and could divert our management’s attention from the operation of our business, even if our defense is successful. In addition, achieving and sustaining compliance with applicable laws and regulations may be costly to us in terms of money, time, and resources.
If we or current or future collaborators, manufacturers, or service providers fail to comply with applicable federal, state, or foreign laws or regulations, we could be subject to enforcement actions, which could affect our ability to develop, market, and sell our products successfully and could harm our reputation and lead to reduced acceptance of our products by the market. These enforcement actions include, among others:
•adverse regulatory inspection findings;
•warning or untitled letters;
•voluntary or mandatory product recalls or public notification or medical product safety alerts to healthcare professionals;
•restrictions on, or prohibitions against, marketing our products;
•restrictions on, or prohibitions against, importation or exportation of our products;
•suspension of review or refusal to approve pending applications or supplements to approved applications, including due to pending enforcement actions or a finding of an enforcement action;
•exclusion from participation in government-funded healthcare programs;
•exclusion from eligibility for the award of government contracts for our products;
•a corporate integrity agreement;
•FDA debarment of individuals at our Company;
•suspension or withdrawal of product approvals;
•seizure or administrative detention of products;
•injunctions; and
•civil and criminal penalties and fines.
Any drugs we develop may become subject to unfavorable pricing regulations, third-party coverage, and reimbursement practices or healthcare reform initiatives, thereby harming our business.
The regulations that govern marketing approvals, pricing, coverage, and reimbursement for new drugs vary widely from country to country. Some countries require approval of the sale price of a drug before it can be marketed. In many countries, the pricing review period begins after marketing or product licensing approval is granted. In some foreign markets, prescription pharmaceutical pricing remains subject to continuing governmental control even after initial approval is granted. Although we intend to monitor these regulations, our programs are currently in the early stages of development and we will not be able to accurately assess the impact of price regulations for a number of years. As a result, we might obtain regulatory approval for a product in a particular country but then be subject to price regulations that delay our commercial launch of the product and negatively impact the revenues we are able to generate from the sale of the product in that country.
In the U.S. and markets in other countries, patients generally rely on third-party payors to reimburse all or part of the costs associated with their treatment. Adequate coverage and reimbursement from governmental healthcare programs, such as Medicare and Medicaid, and commercial payors, is critical to new product acceptance. Our ability to commercialize any products successfully will also depend in part on the extent to which coverage and reimbursement for these products and related treatments will be available from government health administration authorities, private health insurers, and other organizations. Government authorities and third-party payors, such as private health insurers and health maintenance organizations, decide which medications they will pay for and establish reimbursement levels. The availability of coverage and extent of reimbursement by governmental and private payors is essential for most patients to be able to afford treatments. Sales of products that we may identify will depend substantially, both domestically and abroad, on the extent to which the costs of our product candidates will be paid by health maintenance, managed care, pharmacy benefit and similar healthcare management organizations, or reimbursed by government health administration authorities, private health coverage insurers and other third-party payors. However, there may be significant delays in obtaining coverage for newly approved drugs. Moreover, eligibility for coverage does not necessarily signify that a drug will be reimbursed in all cases or at a rate that covers our costs, including research, development, manufacture, sale, and distribution costs. Also, interim payments for new drugs, if applicable, may be insufficient to cover our costs and may not be made permanent. Thus, even if we succeed in bringing one or more products to the market, these products may not be considered medically necessary or cost-effective, and the amount reimbursed for any products may be insufficient to allow us to sell our products on a competitive basis. Because our programs are in the early stages of development, we are unable at this time to determine their cost effectiveness, or the likely level or method of reimbursement. In addition, obtaining coverage and reimbursement approval of a product from a government or other third-party payor is a time-consuming and costly process that could require us to provide to each payor supporting scientific, clinical, and cost-effectiveness data for the use of our product on a payor-by-payor basis, with no assurance that coverage and adequate reimbursement will be obtained. A payor’s decision to provide coverage for a product does not imply that an adequate reimbursement rate will be approved. Further, one payor’s determination to provide coverage for a product does not assure that other payors will also provide coverage for the product. Adequate third-party reimbursement may not be available to enable us to maintain price levels sufficient to realize an appropriate return on our investment in product development. If reimbursement is not available or is available only at limited levels, we may not be able to successfully commercialize any product candidate that we successfully develop.
Increasingly, the third-party payors who reimburse patients or healthcare providers, such as government and private insurance plans, are seeking greater upfront discounts, additional rebates, and other concessions to reduce the prices for pharmaceutical products. Factors payors consider in determining reimbursement are based on whether the product is:
•a covered benefit under its health plan;
•safe, effective and medically necessary;
•appropriate for the specific patient;
•cost-effective; and
•neither experimental nor investigational.
If the price we are able to charge for any products we develop is insufficient to cover our costs or provide an acceptable margin, our product candidates are not considered medically necessary or cost effective, or the reimbursement provided for such products is inadequate in light of our development and other costs, our return on investment could be adversely affected.
We currently expect that certain drugs we develop may need to be administered under the supervision of a physician on an outpatient basis. Under currently applicable U.S. law, certain drugs that are not usually self-administered (including injectable drugs) may be eligible for coverage under Medicare through Medicare Part B. Specifically, Medicare Part B coverage may be available for eligible beneficiaries when the following, among other requirements have been satisfied:
•the product is reasonable and necessary for the diagnosis or treatment of the illness or injury for which the product is administered according to accepted standards of medical practice;
•the product is typically furnished incident to a physician’s services;
•the indication for which the product will be used is included or approved for inclusion in certain Medicare-designated pharmaceutical compendia (when used for an off-label use); and
•the product has been approved by the FDA.
Average prices for drugs may be reduced by mandatory discounts or rebates required by government healthcare programs or private payors and by any future relaxation of laws that presently restrict imports of drugs from countries where they may be sold at lower prices than in the U.S. Reimbursement rates under Medicare Part B would depend in part on whether the newly approved product would be eligible for a unique billing code. Self-administered, outpatient drugs are typically reimbursed under Medicare Part D, and drugs that are administered in an inpatient hospital setting are typically reimbursed under Medicare Part A under a bundled payment. It is difficult for us to predict how Medicare coverage and reimbursement policies will be applied to our products in the future and coverage and reimbursement under different federal healthcare programs are not always consistent. Medicare reimbursement rates may also reflect budgetary constraints placed on the Medicare program.
Commercial third-party payors often rely upon Medicare coverage policies and payment limitations in setting their own reimbursement rates. These coverage policies and limitations may rely, in part, on compendia listings for approved therapeutics. Our inability to promptly obtain relevant compendia listings, coverage, and adequate reimbursement from both government-funded and private payors for new drugs that we develop and for which we obtain regulatory approval could have a material adverse effect on our operating results, our ability to raise capital needed to commercialize products, and our financial condition. Further, due to the COVID-19 pandemic, millions of individuals have lost or will be losing employer-based insurance coverage, which may adversely affect our ability to commercialize our product candidates even if there is adequate coverage and reimbursement from third-party payors.
We expect that these and other healthcare reform measures that may be adopted in the future may result in more rigorous coverage criteria and lower reimbursement and in additional downward pressure on the price that we receive for any approved product. Any reduction in reimbursement from Medicare or other government-funded programs may result in a similar reduction in payments from private payors. The implementation of cost containment measures or other healthcare reforms may prevent us from being able to generate revenue, attain profitability, or commercialize our drugs once marketing approval is obtained.
In addition, there has been increasing legislative and enforcement interest in the U.S. with respect to specialty drug pricing practices. Specifically, there have been several recent U.S. Congressional inquiries and proposed and enacted federal and state legislation designed to, among other things, bring more transparency to drug pricing, review the relationship between pricing and manufacturer patient assistance programs, and reform government program reimbursement methodologies for drugs. For example, at the federal level, the former administration’s budget for fiscal year 2021 included a $135 billion allowance (over a period of time) to support legislative proposals seeking to reduce drug prices, increase competition, lower out-of-pocket drug costs for patients, and increase patient access to lower-cost generic and biosimilar drugs. On March 10, 2020, the Trump administration sent “principles” for drug pricing to Congress, calling for legislation that would, among other things, cap Medicare Part D beneficiary out-of-pocket pharmacy expenses, provide an option to cap Medicare Part D beneficiary monthly out-of-pocket expenses, and place limits on pharmaceutical price increases. Further, the former U.S. President’s administration released a “Blueprint”, or plan, to lower drug prices and reduce out-of-pocket costs of drugs that contains additional proposals to increase drug manufacturer competition, increase the negotiating power of certain federal healthcare programs, incentivize manufacturers to lower the list price of their products, and reduce the out-of-pocket costs of drug products paid by consumers. The Department of Health and Human Services (“HHS”) has already implemented certain of these measures, while others are pending. For example, in May 2019, CMS issued a final rule to allow Medicare Advantage Plans the option of using step therapy, a type of prior authorization, for Part B drugs beginning January 1, 2020. Although a number of these and other proposed measures will require authorization through additional legislation to become effective, it is unclear whether the Biden administration will challenge, reverse, revoke, or otherwise modify these recent executive and administrative actions. Individual states in the U.S. have also become increasingly active in passing legislation and implementing regulations designed to control pharmaceutical product pricing, including price or patient reimbursement constraints, discounts, restrictions on certain product access and marketing cost disclosure and transparency measures, and, in some cases, designed to encourage importation from other countries and bulk purchasing.
We believe that the efforts of governments and other third-party payors to contain or reduce the cost of healthcare and legislative and regulatory proposals to broaden the availability of healthcare will continue to affect the business and financial condition of pharmaceutical and biopharmaceutical companies. A number of legislative and regulatory changes in the healthcare system in the U.S. and other major healthcare markets have been proposed, and such efforts have expanded substantially in recent years. These developments could, directly or indirectly, affect our ability to sell our products, if approved, at a favorable price.
In 2010, the U.S. Congress passed the ACA, a sweeping law intended to broaden access to health insurance, reduce or constrain the growth of health spending, enhance remedies against fraud and abuse, add new transparency requirements for the healthcare and health insurance industries, impose new taxes and fees on the health industry, and impose additional policy reforms. Since then, the ACA has undergone executive, judicial, and legislative challenges, and while the Biden administration has signaled an intent to bolster the ACA, ongoing uncertainty around the future of the ACA and, in particular, the impact to reimbursement levels, may lead to uncertainty or delay in the purchasing decisions of our customers, which may in turn negatively impact our product sales. If there are not adequate reimbursement levels, our business and results of operations could be adversely affected.
Among the provisions of the ACA addressing coverage and reimbursement of pharmaceutical products of importance to our potential therapeutic candidates are the following:
•increases to pharmaceutical manufacturer rebate liability under the Medicaid Drug Rebate Program due to an increase in the minimum basic Medicaid rebate on most branded prescription drugs and the application of Medicaid rebate liability to drugs used in risk-based Medicaid managed care plans;
•a Medicare Part D coverage gap discount program, in which manufacturers must agree to offer 70% (increased pursuant to the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2018, effective as of 2019) point-of-sale discounts off negotiated prices of applicable brand drugs to eligible beneficiaries during their coverage gap period, as a condition for the manufacturer’s outpatient drugs to be covered under Medicare Part D;
•the expansion of the 340B Drug Pricing Program to require discounts for “covered outpatient drugs” sold to certain children’s hospitals, critical access hospitals, freestanding cancer hospitals, rural referral centers, and sole community hospitals;
•requirements imposed on pharmaceutical companies to offer discounts on brand-name drugs to patients who fall within the Medicare Part D coverage gap, commonly referred to as the “Donut Hole”;
•requirements imposed on pharmaceutical companies to pay an annual non-tax-deductible fee to the federal government based on each company’s market share of prior year total sales of branded drugs to certain federal healthcare programs, such as Medicare, Medicaid, Department of Veterans Affairs, and Department of Defense. Since we currently expect our branded pharmaceutical sales to constitute a small portion of the total federal healthcare program pharmaceutical market, we do not currently expect this annual assessment to have a material impact on our financial condition; and
•for products classified as biologics, marketing approval for a follow-on biologic product may not become effective until 12 years after the date on which the reference innovator biologic product was first licensed by the FDA, with a possible six-month extension for pediatric products. After this exclusivity ends, it may be possible for biosimilar manufacturers to enter the market, which is likely to reduce the pricing for the innovator product and could affect our profitability if our products are classified as biologics.
Since its enactment, there have been numerous judicial, administrative, executive, and legislative challenges to certain aspects of the ACA, and we expect that there will be additional challenges and amendments to the ACA in the future. Various portions of the ACA are currently undergoing legal and constitutional challenges in the United States Supreme Court; the Trump Administration issued various Executive Orders which eliminated cost sharing subsidies and various provisions that would impose a fiscal burden on states or a cost, fee, tax, penalty, or regulatory burden on individuals, healthcare providers, health insurers, or manufacturers of pharmaceuticals or medical devices; and Congress has introduced several pieces of legislation aimed at significantly revising or repealing the ACA. The United States Supreme Court is expected to rule on a legal challenge to the constitutionality of the ACA in early 2021. The implementation of the ACA is ongoing, the law appears likely to continue the downward pressure on pharmaceutical pricing, especially under the Medicare program, and may also increase our regulatory burdens and operating costs. Litigation and legislation related to the ACA are likely to continue, with unpredictable and uncertain results.
Also, in 2018, the Trickett Wendler, Frank Mogiello, Jordan McLinn, and Matthew Bellina Right to Try Act of 2017 provided a federal framework for certain patients with life-threatening diseases to access certain investigational new drug products that have completed a Phase 1 clinical trial and that are undergoing investigation for FDA approval. Under certain circumstances, eligible patients can seek treatment without enrolling in clinical trials and without obtaining FDA permission under the FDA expanded access program. There is no obligation for a drug manufacturer to make its drug products available to eligible patients as a result of the Right to Try Act.
From time to time, legislation is drafted, introduced, and passed in the U.S. Congress that could significantly change the statutory provisions governing coverage, reimbursement, and marketing of products regulated by CMS or other government agencies. In addition to new legislation, CMS coverage and reimbursement policies are often revised or interpreted in ways that may significantly affect our business and our products.
Our ability to obtain reimbursement or funding from the federal government may be impacted by possible reductions in federal spending.
U.S. federal government agencies currently face potentially significant spending reductions. The Budget Control Act of 2011 (the “BCA”) established a Joint Select Committee on Deficit Reduction, which was tasked with achieving a reduction in the federal debt level of at least $1.2 trillion. The Joint Select Committee on Deficit Reduction did not achieve a targeted deficit reduction for fiscal years 2012 through 2021, triggering the legislation’s automatic reduction to several government programs. This includes aggregate reductions to Medicare payments to providers of up to 2% per fiscal year, which went into effect beginning on April 1, 2013 and will stay in effect through 2030 unless additional Congressional action is taken. Pursuant to the CARES Act, and subsequent legislation, these reductions have been suspended from May 1, 2020 through March 31, 2021 due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Proposed legislation, if passed, would extend this suspension until conclusion of the COVID-19 national emergency.
More recently, there has been heightened governmental scrutiny over the manner in which manufacturers set prices for their marketed products, which have resulted in several recent Congressional inquiries and proposed bills designed to, among other things, bring more transparency to product pricing, review the relationship between pricing and manufacturer patient programs, and reform government program reimbursement methodologies for pharmaceutical products. Individual states in the U.S. have also become increasingly active in passing legislation and implementing regulations designed to control pharmaceutical product pricing, including price or patient reimbursement constraints, discounts, restrictions on certain product access and marketing cost disclosure and transparency measures, and, in some cases, designed to encourage importation from other countries and bulk purchasing.
On July 24, 2020 and September 13, 2020, former President Trump announced several executive orders related to prescription drug pricing that seek to implement several of the administration's proposals. As a result, on November 20, 2020, CMS issued an Interim Final Rule implementing the Most Favored Nation (“MFN”) Model under which Medicare Part B reimbursement rates will be calculated for certain drugs and biologicals based on the lowest price drug manufacturers receive in Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development countries with a similar gross domestic product per capita. The MFN Model regulations mandate participation by identified Part B providers and will apply in all U.S. states and territories for a seven-year period beginning January 1, 2021 and ending December 31, 2027. On December 28, 2020, a judge in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California granted a preliminary injunction prohibiting CMS from implementing the MFN rule pending completion of the comment and rulemaking process required under the Administrative Procedures Act. We will continue to monitor the impact this rule and subsequent challenges may have on our business.
Additionally, on November 20, 2020, HHS finalized a regulation removing safe harbor protection for price reductions from pharmaceutical manufacturers to plan sponsors under Part D, either directly or through pharmacy benefit managers, unless the price reduction is required by law. The rule also creates a new safe harbor for price reductions reflected at the point-of-sale, as well as a safe harbor for certain fixed fee arrangements between pharmacy benefit managers and manufacturers. The likelihood of implementation of any of the other Trump administration reform initiatives is uncertain, particularly in light of the installation of the new Biden administration. Although this and other proposed measures will require authorization through additional legislation to become effective, Congress and the current administration have each indicated that it will continue to seek new legislative and/or administrative measures to control drug costs.
The full impact on our business of any future cuts in Medicare or other programs is uncertain. In addition, we cannot predict any impact the U.S. President’s administration and the U.S. Congress may have on the federal budget. If federal spending is reduced, anticipated budgetary shortfalls may also impact the ability of relevant agencies, such as the FDA or the National Institutes of Health, to continue to function at current levels. Amounts allocated to federal grants and contracts may be reduced or eliminated. These reductions may also impact the ability of relevant agencies to timely review and approve drug research and development, manufacturing, and marketing activities, which may delay our ability to develop, market, and sell any products we may develop.
Recent federal legislation and actions by state and local governments may permit reimportation of drugs from foreign countries into the U.S., including foreign countries where the drugs are sold at lower prices than in the U.S., which could materially adversely affect our operating results.
We may face competition in the U.S. for our product candidates, if approved, from therapies sourced from foreign countries that have placed price controls on pharmaceutical products. In the U.S., the MMA contains provisions that may change U.S. importation laws and expand pharmacists’ and wholesalers’ ability to import cheaper versions of an approved drug and competing products from Canada, where there are government price controls. Further, the MMA provides that these changes to U.S. importation laws will not take effect unless and until the Secretary of HHS certifies that the changes will pose no additional risk to the public’s health and safety and will result in a significant reduction in the cost of products to consumers. On September 23, 2020, the Secretary of HHS made such certification to Congress, and on October 1, 2020, the FDA published a final rule that allows for the importation of certain prescription drugs from Canada. Under the final rule, States and Indian Tribes, and in certain future circumstances pharmacists and wholesalers, may submit importation program proposals to the FDA for review and authorization. Since the issuance of the final rule, on November 23, 2020, several industry groups filed federal lawsuits in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, requesting injunctive relief to prevent implementation of the rule. Further, authorities in Canada have passed rules designed to safeguard the Canadian drug supply from shortages. If implemented, importation of drugs from Canada and the MFN Model, as further discussed above, may materially and adversely affect the price we receive for any of our product candidates. We will continue to monitor developments and their potential effect on our business. We may face competition in the U.S. for our development candidates and investigational medicines, if approved, from therapies sourced from foreign countries that have placed price controls on pharmaceutical products. In the U.S., the FDA issued a final guidance document outlining a pathway for manufacturers to obtain an additional National Drug Code (“NDC”) for an FDA-approved drug that was originally intended to be marketed in a foreign country and that was authorized for sale in that foreign country. The market implications of the final guidance is unknown at this time. Proponents of drug reimportation may attempt to pass legislation that would directly allow reimportation under certain circumstances. Legislation or regulations allowing the reimportation of drugs, if enacted, could decrease the price we receive for any products that we may develop and adversely affect our future revenues and prospects for profitability. Such legislation, regulations, and executive action allowing the importation or reimportation of drugs could decrease the price we receive for any products that we may develop and adversely affect our future revenues and prospects for profitability.
If any of our product candidates receive marketing approval and we or others later identify undesirable side effects caused by the product candidate, our ability to market and derive revenue from the product candidates could be compromised.
In the event that any of our product candidates receive regulatory approval and we or others identify undesirable side effects, adverse events, or other problems caused by one of our products, any of the following adverse events could occur, which could result in the loss of significant revenue to us and materially and adversely affect our results of operations and business:
•regulatory authorities may withdraw their approval of the product or seize the product;
•we may need to recall the product or change the way the product is administered to patients;
•additional restrictions may be imposed on the marketing of the particular product or the manufacturing processes for the product or any component thereof;
•we may not be able to secure or maintain adequate coverage and reimbursement for our proprietary product candidates from government (including U.S. federal healthcare programs) and private payors;
•we may be subject to fines, restitution or disgorgement of profits or revenues, injunctions, or the imposition of civil penalties or criminal prosecution;
•regulatory authorities may require the addition of labeling statements, such as a “black box” warning or a contraindication;
•regulatory authorities may require us to implement a REMS, or to conduct post-marketing studies or clinical trials and surveillance to monitor the safety or efficacy of the product; we may be required to create a Medication Guide outlining the risks of such side effects for distribution to patients;
•we could be sued and held liable for harm caused to patients;
•the product may become less competitive; and
•our reputation may suffer.
Inadequate funding for the FDA, the SEC, and other government agencies could hinder their ability to hire and retain key leadership and other personnel, prevent new products and services from being developed or commercialized in a timely manner, or otherwise prevent those agencies from performing normal business functions on which the operation of our business may rely, which could negatively impact our business.
The ability of the FDA to review and approve new products can be affected by a variety of factors, including government budget and funding levels, ability to hire and retain key personnel, and accept the payment of user fees, and statutory, regulatory, and policy changes. Average review times at the agency have fluctuated in recent years as a result. In addition, government funding of the SEC and other government agencies on which our operations may rely, including those that fund research and development activities, is subject to the political process, which is inherently fluid and unpredictable.
Disruptions at the FDA and other agencies may also slow the time necessary for new drugs to be reviewed and/or approved by necessary government agencies, which would adversely affect our business. For example, over the last several years, including beginning on December 22, 2018, the U.S. government has shut down several times and certain regulatory agencies, such as the FDA and the SEC, have had to furlough critical FDA, SEC, and other government employees and stop critical activities. If a prolonged government shutdown occurs, it could significantly impact the ability of the FDA to review and process our regulatory submissions timely, which could have a material adverse effect on our business. Further, future government shutdowns could impact our ability to access the public markets and obtain necessary capital in order to properly capitalize and continue our operations.
Separately, in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, on March 10, 2020, the FDA announced its intention to postpone most inspections of foreign manufacturing facilities while local, national, and international conditions warrant. On March 18, 2020, the FDA announced its intention to temporarily postpone routine surveillance inspections of domestic manufacturing facilities and provided guidance regarding the conduct of clinical trials which the FDA continues to update. As of June 23, 2020, the FDA noted it was conducting mission critical domestic and foreign inspections to ensure compliance of manufacturing facilities with FDA quality standards. In July 2020, the FDA restarted domestic on-site inspections. The FDA has developed a rating system to assist in determining when and where it is safest to conduct prioritized domestic inspections. Should the FDA determine that an inspection of manufacturing or clinical sites is necessary for approval and an inspection cannot be completed during the review cycle due to restrictions on travel, the FDA has stated that it generally intends to issue a complete response letter. Further, if there is inadequate information to make a determination on the acceptability of a facility, or the acceptability of clinical sites, the FDA may defer action on the application until an inspection can be completed. In 2020, several companies announced receipt of complete response letters due to the FDA’s inability to complete required inspections for their applications. Regulatory authorities outside the U.S. may adopt similar restrictions or other policy measures in response to the COVID-19 pandemic and may experience delays in their regulatory activities.
Risks Related to Our Common Stock
Our stock price is volatile and purchasers of our common stock could incur substantial losses.
Our stock price has historically fluctuated widely and is likely to continue to be volatile. From January 30, 2014, the first day of trading of our common stock, through December 31, 2020, the closing sale price of our common stock has ranged between a high of $46.00 per share and a low of $2.45 per share. The market price for our common stock may be influenced by many factors, including the other risks described in this “Risk Factors” section, and the following:
•the success or failure of competitive products or technologies;
•delays in initiating or completing and the results of preclinical studies and clinical trials of our product candidates or those of our competitors, our existing collaborators, or any future collaborators;
•regulatory or legal developments in the U.S. and other countries, especially changes in laws or regulations applicable to our product candidates;
•introductions and announcements of new products by us, our commercialization collaborators, or our competitors, and the timing of these introductions or announcements;
•actions taken by regulatory agencies with respect to our or our competitors’ product candidates, products, clinical studies, manufacturing processes, or sales and marketing terms;
•actual or anticipated variations in our financial results or those of companies that are perceived to be similar to us;
•the success of our or our competitors’ efforts to acquire or in-license additional technologies, products, or product candidates;
•developments concerning our or our competitors’ products or collaborations, including but not limited to, those with sources of manufacturing supply and commercialization partners;
•announcements by us or our competitors of significant acquisitions, strategic collaborations, joint ventures, or capital commitments;
•our ability or inability to raise additional capital and the terms on which we raise it;
•the recruitment or departure of key personnel;
•changes in the structure of healthcare payment systems;
•market conditions in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology sectors;
•actual or anticipated changes in earnings estimates or changes in stock market analyst recommendations regarding our common stock, other comparable companies, or our industry generally;
•our failure or the failure of our competitors to meet analysts’ projections or guidance that we or our competitors may give to the market;
•fluctuations in the valuation of companies perceived by investors to be comparable to us;
•announcement and expectation of additional financing efforts;
•speculation in the press or investment community;
•trading volume of our common stock;
•sales of our common stock by us or our stockholders;
•the absence of lock-up agreements with the holders of substantially all of our outstanding shares in connection with follow-on public offerings of our common stock;
•the concentrated ownership of our common stock;
•changes in accounting principles;
•terrorist acts, acts of war, or periods of widespread civil unrest;
•shifts in the political environment and changes in the government and agency leadership positions in connection with the 2020 presidential election as well as future election cycles;
•natural disasters and other calamities, including the COVID-19 pandemic;
•general economic, industry, and market conditions; and
•developments concerning complaints or litigation against us.
In addition, the stock markets in general, and the markets for pharmaceutical, biopharmaceutical, and biotechnology stocks in particular have experienced extreme volatility that has often been unrelated to the operating performance of the issuer. These broad market and industry factors may seriously harm the market price of our common stock, regardless of our operating performance.
The employment agreements with our executive officers may require us to pay severance benefits to officers who are terminated in connection with a change of control of the Company, which could harm our financial condition.
Our executive officers are parties to employment agreements providing, in the event of a termination of employment in connection with a change of control of the Company, for significant cash payments for severance and other benefits and acceleration of vesting of up to all outstanding stock options. The accelerated vesting of options could result in dilution to our existing stockholders and reduce the market price of our common stock. The payment of these severance benefits could harm our financial condition. In addition, these potential severance payments may discourage or prevent third parties from seeking a business combination with us.
Our principal stockholders and management own a significant percentage of our stock and will be able to exert significant control over matters subject to stockholder approval.
As of December 31, 2020, our executive officers and directors, together with holders of five percent or more of our outstanding common stock and their respective affiliates, beneficially owned, in the aggregate, approximately 39.5% of our outstanding common stock, including shares subject to outstanding options that are exercisable within 60 days after such date, based on the Forms 3 and 4 and Schedules 13D and 13G filed by them with the SEC. As a result, these stockholders, if acting together, will continue to have significant influence over the outcome of corporate actions requiring stockholder approval, including the election of directors, any merger, consolidation, or sale of all or substantially all of our assets, and any other significant corporate transaction. The interests of these stockholders may not be the same as, or may even conflict with, the interests of our other stockholders. For example, these stockholders could delay or prevent a change of control of our Company, even if such a change of control would benefit our other stockholders, which could deprive our stockholders of an opportunity to receive a premium for their common stock as part of a sale of our Company or our assets and might affect the prevailing market price of our common stock. The significant concentration of stock ownership may adversely affect the trading price of our common stock due to investors’ perception that conflicts of interest may exist or arise.
Anti-takeover provisions in our charter documents and under Delaware law could make an acquisition of us, which may be beneficial to our stockholders, more difficult and may prevent attempts by our stockholders to replace or remove our current management.
Provisions in our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and our amended and restated bylaws may delay or prevent an acquisition of us or a change in our management. In addition, these provisions may frustrate or prevent any attempts by our stockholders to replace or remove our current management by making it more difficult for stockholders to replace members of our Board of Directors. Because our Board of Directors is responsible for appointing the members of our management team, these provisions could in turn affect any attempt by our stockholders to replace current members of our management team. These provisions include:
•a prohibition on actions by our stockholders by written consent;
•a requirement that special meetings of stockholders, which the Company is not obligated to call more than once per calendar year, be called only by the chairman of our Board of Directors, our Chief Executive Officer, our Board of Directors pursuant to a resolution adopted by a majority of the total number of authorized directors, or, subject to certain conditions, by our secretary at the request of the stockholders holding of record, in the aggregate, shares entitled to cast not less than ten percent of the votes at a meeting of the stockholders (assuming all shares entitled to vote at such meeting were present and voted);
•advance notice requirements for election to our Board of Directors and for proposing matters that can be acted upon at stockholder meetings; and
•the authority of the Board of Directors to issue preferred stock, such as the Redeemable Convertible Preferred, with such terms as the Board of Directors may determine.
Moreover, because we are incorporated in Delaware, we are governed by the provisions of Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, as amended, which prohibits a person who owns in excess of 15 percent of our outstanding voting stock from merging or combining with us for a period of three years after the date of the transaction in which the person acquired in excess of 15 percent of our outstanding voting stock, unless the merger or combination is approved in a prescribed manner. These provisions would apply even if the proposed merger or acquisition could be considered beneficial by some stockholders.
We incur increased costs as a result of operating as a public company, and our management is required to devote substantial time to new compliance initiatives and corporate governance practices.
As a public company, we incur, and we will continue to incur, significant legal, accounting, and other expenses.
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, the listing requirements of The Nasdaq Global Select Market, and other applicable securities rules and regulations impose various requirements on public companies, including establishment and maintenance of effective disclosure and financial controls and corporate governance practices. Our management and other personnel need to devote a substantial amount of time to these compliance initiatives. Moreover, these rules and regulations increase our legal and financial compliance costs and make some activities more time-consuming and costly. For example, we expect that these rules and regulations make it more difficult and more expensive for us to obtain director and officer liability insurance, which in turn could make it more difficult for us to attract and retain qualified members of our Board of Directors. However, these rules and regulations are often subject to varying interpretations, in many cases due to their lack of specificity, and, as a result, their application in practice may evolve over time as new guidance is provided by regulatory and governing bodies. This could result in continuing uncertainty regarding compliance matters and higher costs necessitated by ongoing revisions to disclosure and governance practices.
Because we do not anticipate paying any cash dividends on our capital stock in the foreseeable future, capital appreciation, if any, will be your sole source of gain.
We have never declared or paid cash dividends on our common stock. We currently intend to retain all of our future earnings, if any, to finance the growth and development of our business. As a result, capital appreciation, if any, of our common stock will be the sole source of gain of our common stockholders for the foreseeable future.
We may incur significant costs from class action litigation due to our historical or expected stock volatility.
Our stock price has fluctuated and may fluctuate for many reasons, including as a result of public announcements regarding the progress of our development efforts or the development efforts of our collaborators or competitors, the addition or departure of our key personnel, variations in our quarterly operating results, and changes in market valuations of pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies. This risk is especially relevant to us because pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies have experienced significant stock price volatility in recent years. When the market price of a stock has been volatile as our stock price has been and may be, holders of that stock have occasionally brought securities class action litigation against the company that issued the stock. If any of our stockholders were to bring a lawsuit of this type against us, even if the lawsuit is without merit, we could incur substantial costs defending the lawsuit. The lawsuit could also divert the time and attention of our management.
Our amended and restated bylaws designate the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware as the sole and exclusive forum for certain types of actions and proceedings that may be initiated by our stockholders, which could limit our stockholders’ ability to obtain a favorable judicial forum for disputes with us or our directors, officers, or employees.
Our amended and restated bylaws provide that, subject to limited exceptions, the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware will be the sole and exclusive forum for any derivative action or proceeding brought on our behalf, any action asserting a claim of breach of a fiduciary duty owed by any of our directors, officers, or other employees to us or our stockholders, any action asserting a claim against us arising pursuant to any provision of the Delaware General Corporation Law, as amended, our amended and restated certificate of incorporation or our amended and restated bylaws, any action to interpret, apply, enforce, or determine the validity of our amended and restated certificate of incorporation or our amended and restated bylaws, any action to interpret, apply, enforce or determine the validity of our amended and restated certificate of incorporation or our amended and restated bylaws, or any other action asserting a claim against us that is governed by the internal affairs doctrine. Any person or entity purchasing or otherwise acquiring any interest in shares of our capital stock shall be deemed to have notice of and to have consented to the provisions of our amended and restated certificate of incorporation described above. This choice of forum provision may limit a stockholder’s ability to bring a claim in a judicial forum that it finds favorable for disputes with us or our directors, officers, or other employees, which may discourage such lawsuits against us and our directors, officers, and employees. Alternatively, if a court were to find these provisions of our amended and restated certificate of incorporation inapplicable to, or unenforceable in respect of, one or more of the specified types of actions or proceedings, we may incur additional costs associated with resolving such matters in other jurisdictions, which could adversely affect our business and financial condition.
Sales of shares issued in private placements may cause the market price of our shares to decline.
In April 2017, we issued 700,000 shares of the Redeemable Convertible Preferred in a private placement, which were convertible into shares of our common stock at an agreed conversion rate. In December 2017, all shares of Redeemable Convertible Preferred were converted into shares of our common stock. We granted the holders of Redeemable Convertible Preferred certain demand, shelf, and “piggyback” registration rights with respect to the shares of common stock issued upon conversion of the Redeemable Convertible Preferred. Such registration rights continue subsequent to the conversion and repurchase of the Redeemable Convertible Preferred with respect to the shares of common stock issued in such conversion. In accordance with such registration rights, we filed a shelf registration statement on Form S-3 covering the resale of 24,491,663 shares of our common stock by the former holders of Redeemable Convertible Preferred. The registration statement was declared effective on May 9, 2018, and all shares of common stock issued upon conversion of the Redeemable Convertible Preferred may now be freely sold in the open market. Additionally, we issued 983,208 shares of our common stock to Alnylam in April 2018, 835,834 shares of our common stock to Alexion in October 2018, 5,414,185 shares of our common stock to Lilly in December 2018, and 2,279,982 shares of our common stock to Novo in December 2019. The sale of a significant amount of these shares in the open market or the perception that these sales may occur could cause the market price of our common stock to decline or become highly volatile.
General Risks
The future issuance of equity or of debt securities that are convertible into equity will dilute our share capital.
We may choose to raise additional capital in the future depending on market conditions, strategic considerations, and operational requirements. To the extent that additional capital is raised through the issuance of shares or other securities convertible into shares, our stockholders will be diluted. Future issuances of our common stock or other equity securities, or the perception that such sales may occur, could adversely affect the trading price of our common stock and impair our ability to raise capital through future offerings of shares or equity securities. We cannot predict the effect, if any, that future sales of common stock or the availability of common stock for future sales will have on the trading price of our common stock.
If securities or industry analysts do not publish research or reports about our business, or if they issue an adverse opinion regarding our stock, our stock price and trading volume could decline.
The trading market for our common stock will be influenced by the research and reports that industry or securities analysts publish about us or our business. If any of the analysts who cover us issue an adverse opinion regarding us, our business model, our intellectual property, or our stock performance, or if our target studies and operating results fail to meet the expectations of analysts, our stock price would likely decline. If one or more of these analysts cease coverage of us or fail to publish reports on us regularly, we could lose visibility in the financial markets, which in turn could cause our stock price or trading volume to decline.
Our stockholders may experience significant dilution as a result of future equity offerings and exercise of outstanding options.
In order to raise additional capital, we may in the future offer additional shares of our common stock or other securities convertible into or exchangeable for our common stock, as we did with the Redeemable Convertible Preferred shares, which were converted into common stock in December 2017 and with the follow-on offerings of our common stock in December 2017 and September 2018. We cannot assure you that we will be able to sell shares or other securities in any offering at a price per share that is equal to or greater than the price paid by our existing shareholders, and investors purchasing shares or other securities in the future could have rights superior to existing stockholders. The price per share at which we sell additional shares of our common stock or other securities convertible into or exchangeable for our common stock in future transactions may be higher or lower than the price per share paid by our existing stockholders.
In addition, we have a significant number of securities allowing for the purchase of our common stock. As of February 22, 2021, we also had 7,753,716 shares of common stock reserved for future issuance under our stock incentive plans. As of that date, there were also stock options to purchase 15,636,492 shares of our common stock and 1,304,316 restricted stock units outstanding. The exercise of outstanding options having an exercise price per share that is less than the offering price per share paid by our existing stockholders will increase dilution to such stockholders.
Future sales of our common stock in the public market could cause our stock price to fall.
Sales of a substantial number of shares of our common stock in the public market, or the perception that these sales might occur, could depress the market price of our common stock and could impair our ability to raise capital through the sale of additional equity securities. As of February 22, 2021, we had 76,320,893 shares of common stock outstanding, all of which, other than shares held by our directors and certain officers, were eligible for sale in the public market, subject in some cases to compliance with the requirements of Rule 144, including the volume limitations and manner of sale requirements. In addition, shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of outstanding options and shares reserved for future issuances under our stock incentive plans will become eligible for sale in the public market to the extent permitted by applicable vesting requirements and subject in some cases to compliance with the requirements of Rule 144.

---

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
None.

---

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
The following table summarizes information regarding our significant leased properties as of December 31, 2020:
Location Primary Use Approximate Square Footage Lease Termination Renewal Options
33 Hayden Avenue
Lexington, MA Primary research facility 80,872 October 2026 Two five-year periods
75 Hayden Avenue
Lexington, MA Corporate headquarters; office and biotechnology laboratory space 91,728 March 2031 Two five-year periods
4949 Pearl East Circle
Boulder, CO Office and biotechnology laboratory space 22,766 September 2027 Two five-year periods
We believe that suitable additional or alternative space will be available as needed on commercially reasonable terms.

---

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
From time to time we may be subject to legal proceedings, claims, and litigation arising in the ordinary course of business. We are not currently a party to or aware of any proceedings that we believe will have, individually or in the aggregate, a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, or results of operations. Any future litigation could result in substantial costs and divert our management’s attention and resources, which could cause serious harm to our business, operating results, and financial condition. We maintain liability insurance; however, if any costs or expenses associated with this or any other litigation exceed our insurance coverage, we may be forced to bear some or all of these costs or expenses directly, which could be substantial.

---

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURE
ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
Not applicable.
PART II

---

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
Market Information for Common Stock
Our common stock trades on The Nasdaq Global Select Market under the symbol “DRNA.”
Equity Compensation Plans
For information regarding equity compensation plans, see Item 12 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Holders of Record
As of February 22, 2021, there were approximately six holders of record of our common stock. Because many of our shares of common stock are held by brokers and other institutions on behalf of stockholders, we are unable to estimate the total number of beneficial stockholders represented by these record holders.
Dividend Policy
We currently intend to retain future earnings, if any, for use in the operation of our business and to fund future growth. We have never declared or paid cash dividends on our common stock and we do not intend to pay any cash dividends on our common stock for the foreseeable future. Any future determination related to our dividend policy will be made at the discretion of our Board of Directors in light of conditions then existing, including factors such as our results of operations, financial condition and requirements, business conditions, and covenants under any applicable contractual arrangements.
Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities
Not applicable.
Use of Proceeds from Initial Public Offering of Common Stock
Not applicable.
Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Parties
None.
Performance Graph
The following graph illustrates a comparison of the total cumulative stockholder return on our common stock to The Nasdaq Composite and The Nasdaq Biotechnology indices for each of the last five fiscal years ended December 31, 2020, assuming an initial investment of $100 on December 31, 2015. The stock price performance on the following graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance. This performance graph shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or incorporated by reference into any of our filings under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except as shall be expressly set forth by specific reference in such filing.

---

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

---

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results could differ materially from those discussed here. Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include, but are not limited to, those discussed in this section as well as factors described in Part I, Item 1A - “Risk Factors” and “Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Overview
Dicerna Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“we”, “us,” “our,” “the Company,” or “Dicerna”) is a biopharmaceutical company focused on discovering, developing, and commercializing medicines that are designed to leverage ribonucleic acid interference (“RNAi”) to silence selectively genes that cause or contribute to disease. Using our proprietary GalXC™ and GalXC-Plus™ RNAi technologies, Dicerna is committed to developing RNAi-based therapies with the potential to treat both rare and more prevalent diseases. By silencing disease-causing genes, Dicerna’s GalXC platform has the potential to address conditions that are difficult to treat with other modalities. Initially focused on disease-causing genes in the liver, Dicerna has continued to innovate and is exploring new applications of its RNAi technology with GalXC-Plus, which expands on the functionality and application of our flagship liver-based GalXC technology, yet has the potential to treat diseases across multiple therapeutic areas. In addition to our own pipeline of core discovery and clinical candidates, Dicerna has established collaborative relationships with some of the world’s leading pharmaceutical companies, including Novo Nordisk A/S (“Novo”), Roche, Eli Lilly and Company (“Lilly”), Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (together with its affiliates, “Alexion”), Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH (“BI”), and Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“Alnylam”). Between Dicerna and our collaborative partners, we currently have more than 20 active discovery, preclinical, or clinical programs focused on rare, cardiometabolic, viral, chronic liver, and complement-mediated diseases, as well as neurodegenerative diseases and pain.
Most of our drug discovery and development efforts are based on the therapeutic modality of RNAi, a highly potent, natural, and specific mechanism that can be directed to reduce expression of a target gene. In this naturally occurring biological process, a short, synthetic, double-stranded RNA duplex induces the enzymatic destruction of the messenger ribonucleic acid (“mRNA”) of a target gene that contains sequences complementary to one strand of a double-stranded RNA. Our approach is to design proprietary RNA molecules that have the potential to engage the enzyme Dicer and direct the endogenous cellular RNAi machinery to silence a specific therapeutic target gene. Our GalXC technology utilizes a proprietary GalNAc-mediated conjugate to cause the liver to efficiently internalize our synthetic RNA molecules. In contrast, our GalXC-Plus technology incorporates new chemistries and secondary structures to enable the targeting of genes in tissues and cell types beyond the liver. Our current clinical programs utilize the GalXC technology. Our GalXC-Plus technology utilizes modified RNA structures and various fully-synthetic conjugated ligands to deliver to non-liver tissues and is used in a number of our preclinical programs. Due to the enzymatic nature of RNAi, a single GalXC or GalXC-Plus molecule incorporated into the RNAi machinery can destroy hundreds or thousands of mRNAs from the targeted gene.
The GalXC RNAi platform and other proprietary RNAi delivery technologies support Dicerna’s long-term strategy to retain a full or substantial ownership stake in our programs, subject to the evaluation of potential licensing opportunities as they may arise, and to invest internally in programs for diseases with focused patient populations, such as certain rare diseases or diseases with well-characterized genetic targets. These certain rare disease programs, which include our nedosiran and alpha-1 antitrypsin (“AAT”) programs, represent opportunities that we believe carry a relatively higher probability of success, with genetically and molecularly defined disease markers, high unmet medical need, a limited number of centers of excellence to facilitate reaching these patients, and the potential for more rapid clinical development paths to regulatory approval. For more complex diseases with multiple gene dysfunctions and/or larger patient populations, we continue to pursue collaborations that can provide the enhanced scale, resources, and commercial infrastructure required to maximize these prospects.
We currently view our operations and manage our business as one segment which encompasses the discovery, research, and development of treatments based on our RNAi technology platform.
Executive Summary
The following table provides a summary of revenue recognized for the year ended December 31, 2020 (amounts in thousands):
YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31,
Novo $ 13,874
Roche 73,927
Lilly 41,529
Alexion 32,243
BI 2,734
Total $ 164,307
Payments received from our collaboration partners during the three months and year ended December 31, 2020 were as follows (amounts in thousands):
THREE MONTHS ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 2020 YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 2020
Novo $ - $ 175,000
Roche - 201,981
Lilly 10,000 10,000
Alexion 7,500 22,594
BI - 260
Total $ 17,500 $ 409,835
Our results of operations for and liquidity and capital resources as of the year ended December 31, 2020 include the following:
•In January 2020, we entered into a non-cancelable real property lease agreement for 61,282 square feet of office space at 75 Hayden Avenue in Lexington, Massachusetts. The original term commenced during the fourth quarter of 2020 and is for 125 months with options to extend for two additional successive periods of five years thereafter. The aggregate total fixed rent is approximately $41.8 million. In July 2020, we entered into an amendment to the 75 Hayden Avenue lease. The 75 Hayden Avenue lease amendment expands the square footage leased under the 75 Hayden Avenue lease to comprise a total of 91,728 rentable square feet. The 75 Hayden Avenue lease amendment increases monthly base rent by an average of $0.2 million per month.
•In February 2020, we issued and sold approximately $40.0 million of shares of our common stock to a single institutional investor through our “at-the-market” sales facility with Cowen and Company, LLC. In this transaction, we sold an aggregate of 2,077,500 shares of common stock at a price of $19.25 per share, resulting in approximately $39.2 million after a deduction of approximately $0.8 million in sales commissions. The shares in the offering were sold pursuant to a shelf registration statement declared effective by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on May 31, 2018 and a prospectus supplement filed with the SEC on June 1, 2018.
•In April 2020, we and Alnylam entered into a collaboration and license agreement (the “A1AT Agreement”) and a patent cross-license agreement (the “PH Agreement”). Under the A1AT Agreement, we and Alnylam will work to develop and commercialize investigational RNAi therapeutics for the treatment of alpha-1 antitrypsin (“AAT”) deficiency-associated liver disease (“AATLD”). Under the PH Agreement, we and Alnylam cross-licensed our respective intellectual property related to Alnylam’s lumasiran and our nedosiran investigational programs for the treatment of primary hyperoxaluria (“PH”). The non-exclusive license agreement provides for Alnylam to pay mid- to high-single-digit royalties to Dicerna based on global net sales of lumasiran and for Dicerna to pay low-single-digit royalties to Alnylam on global net sales of nedosiran. The non-exclusive cross-license agreement ensures that each party has the freedom to develop and commercialize its respective product.
•In April 2020, Roche nominated the first of up to five targets under the research and development portion of our collaboration agreement.
•In June 2020, the Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) granted rare pediatric disease designation for nedosiran for the treatment of PH. Under the FDA’s rare pediatric disease designation program, the FDA may grant a priority review voucher to a Sponsor who receives a product approval for a “rare pediatric disease.” Subject to FDA approval of nedosiran for the treatment of PH, we would be eligible to receive a voucher that may be redeemed to receive priority review for a subsequent marketing application for a different product candidate or which could be sold or transferred.
•In October 2020, Lilly filed an IND and initiated a Phase 1 study of LY3561774, targeting the ANGPTL3 gene for the treatment of dyslipidemia. As a result of this filing, we achieved a milestone associated with the first filing of an IND with the FDA, entitling us to a $10.0 million payment.
•In December 2020, Novo nominated its first candidate under the Novo Collaboration Agreement. In conjunction with the nomination of the first development candidate, Dicerna earned a $2.5 million milestone, which we received in February 2021. Also in December 2020, Dicerna met its obligation to deliver GalXC molecules for the first year of the Novo Collaboration Agreement, entitling us to a $25.0 million payment, which we received in February 2021.
•We believe we have sufficient capital, along with anticipated milestone and other payments from existing collaborations, to fund the execution of our current clinical and operating plans into 2023.
In February 2021, Lilly notified us of their decision to extend for an additional year the initial research collaboration term for the extrahepatic targets subject to the Lilly Collaboration Agreement. Under the agreement between the companies, Lilly has the option to extend the three-year initial research collaboration term for these extrahepatic targets for up to three consecutive one-year periods. This first extension allows the research program for these extrahepatic targets under the collaboration between the two companies to continue through October 2022.
COVID-19 Update
On March 11, 2020, the World Health Organization declared COVID-19 a pandemic. The global spread of COVID-19 has created significant volatility, uncertainty, and economic disruption worldwide. Governments in affected regions have implemented, and may continue to implement, safety precautions which include quarantines, travel restrictions, business closures, and other public health safety measures.
We have been impacted by mandatory work from home edicts directed by local governments in the jurisdictions in which we operate. However, essential work exemptions continue to permit critical research and development and laboratory activities for limited personnel. Those exemptions enable some continued discovery research and activities supporting our collaborative agreements and our own programs. Externally, the COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in slower enrollment in our clinical trials, and we have undertaken efforts to mitigate potential impacts to our business including those related to conducting clinical trials and managing our supply chain. Our operating results could be affected by delays or suspensions of clinical development associated with COVID-19, which have impacted and may continue to impact global healthcare systems and our trial sites’ enrollment in our clinical trials, such as we have seen in the nedosiran pivotal PHYOX2 and belcesiran Phase 1/2 studies, and delays in the supply chain related to COVID-19. We continue to be alert to the potential for disruptions that could arise from COVID-19 and monitor the FDA’s and other health authorities’ guidance for the conduct of clinical trials during this time.
We conduct clinical trials in various countries around the world, including the United States (“U.S.”) and other areas heavily impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. The current supply of our investigational medicines is sufficient to support ongoing and planned clinical trials. Based on current evaluations, our supply chain continues to appear intact to meet at least the next 12 months of clinical, nonclinical, and chemistry, manufacturing, and control (“CMC”) supply demands across all programs. We have undertaken efforts to mitigate potential future impacts to the supply chain by increasing our stock of critical starting materials required to meet our needs and our collaborative partners’ needs through 2021 and by identifying and engaging alternative suppliers. We continue to be alert to the potential for disruptions that could arise from COVID-19 and remain in close contact with suppliers.
It is difficult to predict what the lasting impact of the pandemic will be, and what the impact might be if we or any of the third parties with whom we engage were to experience additional shutdowns or other prolonged business disruptions. Our ability to conduct our business in the manner and on the timelines presently planned could have a material adverse impact on our business, results of operations, and financial condition. In addition, depending on the duration and impact of the recurrence or resurgence of COVID-19 cases or continued evolution of other strains causing COVID-19, and depending on where the infection rates are highest, and including the ability of regulators to continue ensuring the timely review and approval of applications, our business, results of operations, and financial condition may be negatively impacted. We will continue to monitor developments as we deal with the disruptions and uncertainties relating to the COVID-19 pandemic. Please refer to the “Financial Operations Overview” section below for specific anticipated effects on our financial statement line items.
Development Approach
In choosing which development programs to internally advance, we apply the scientific, clinical, and commercial criteria that we believe allow us to best leverage our GalXC and GalXC-Plus RNAi technologies and maximize value. Using our GalXC RNAi technology, and applying the criteria of our development focus, we have created a pipeline of core liver-focused therapeutic programs for development by Dicerna. For opportunities that were not selected as a core program opportunity, we have sought partners to fund the discovery, and subsequently drive the development of, these non-core opportunities in exchange for upfront payments, milestone payments, royalties on product sales, and potentially other economic and operational arrangements. Our current collaborations with Novo, Lilly, Alexion, and BI resulted from this effort. For core programs targeting rare diseases, we intend to develop these programs internally through approval. For core programs targeting larger populations, we may seek development partners, such as our collaboration with Roche on RG6346, under various economic and operational arrangements. Together, our core program pipeline and our pipeline of non-core collaborative programs constitute a broad and growing therapeutic pipeline that we believe may result in multiple valuable approved products based on our GalXC and GalXC-Plus technologies.
In addition to the programs listed in our pipeline, we are exploring a variety of potential programs involving gene targets in diverse tissues addressable with our GalXC and GalXC-Plus technologies. Some of these programs may be elevated in the future to be either a core program or a non-core collaborative program. Under our collaborations with Novo, Roche, and Lilly, our collaborators have rights to nominate additional programs for discovery by Dicerna and subsequent development by the nominating collaborator, which will become part of our non-core pipeline. In the case of our collaboration with Novo, we retain rights to opt in to deeper participation, including enhanced economic rights, at defined points in clinical development, for two programs nominated by Novo.
Our four current core GalXC development programs are: nedosiran for the treatment of primary hyperoxaluria (“PH”), RG6346 for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B virus (“HBV”) infection, belcesiran (formerly DCR-A1AT) for the treatment of AATLD, and DCR-AUD for the treatment of alcohol use disorder (“AUD”).
We conduct clinical trials in various countries around the world, including the U.S. and other areas heavily impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. The current supply of our investigational medicines is sufficient to support ongoing and planned clinical trials. Based on current evaluations, our supply chain continues to appear intact to meet at least the next 12 months of clinical, nonclinical, and CMC supply demands across all programs. We have undertaken efforts to mitigate potential future impacts to the supply chain by increasing our stock of critical starting materials required to meet our needs and our collaborative partners’ needs through 2021 and by identifying and engaging alternative suppliers. In 2020, there were delays related to several nedosiran PHYOX programs and the belcesiran clinical trial in healthy volunteers as a result of COVID-19. As a result, and based on the most recent updates from clinical sites impacted by COVID-19 and precautionary measures related to the pandemic, we regularly evaluate our expectations related to clinical development milestones.
The table below sets forth the state of development of our various GalXC RNAi platform product candidates as of February 25, 2021:
Our GalXC Platform
The GalXC RNAi Platform
Dicerna’s GalXC platform consists of our liver-targeted GalXC technology and our GalXC-Plus technology for tissues outside the liver. Each utilizes a set of proprietary double-stranded RNA structures capable of inducing RNAi and associated chemical modifications and additions to these structures that enhance their properties and help confer useful “drug-like” properties. Our RNAi-inducing RNA structures consist of two strands of RNA. One of these strands, called the guide strand, is complementary to the mRNA sequence of the gene one is seeking to inhibit. The other strand, called the passenger strand, includes sequences complementary to the guide strand, forming a double-stranded RNA duplex with it. In the case of our GalXC and GalXC-Plus technologies, additional sequences may be added to the passenger strand, including a four-base sequence, known as a tetraloop, which is designed to enhance stability and engineer out immunostimulatory activity and can serve as an attachment point for various chemical additions that can facilitate delivery to diverse tissues.
GalXC RNAi Technology Targeted to the Liver
To target the liver, we conjugate the tetraloop region of our GalXC molecules to a simple sugar, GalNAc, that is specifically recognized by a receptor on the surface of liver hepatocytes. This leads to internalization, ultimately enabling the GalXC molecules to access the RNAi machinery inside the hepatocyte and deliver our targeted oligonucleotide to the RISC complex. Due to the efficiency of this process, a full human dose may be administered via a single subcutaneous injection.
GalXC-Plus RNAi Technology for Tissues Outside the Liver
For delivering to tissues outside the liver, we have continued to innovate our GalXC platform using modified structures, chemistries, and conjugated moieties. Referred to as GalXC-Plus, these proprietary technological advances extend our expertise in RNAi silencing to address new tissues and organs outside the liver, while retaining key pharmacological features from GalXC. In 2020, we presented preclinical data demonstrating the potential application of our GalXC-Plus technology to the CNS, skeletal muscle, and adipose tissue.
Research
We continue to advance our GalXC RNAi platform as it is applied to therapeutic targets expressed in hepatocytes using GalNAc conjugates for both our collaborative research and development programs and our internal liver-targeted programs. All Dicerna collaborative programs include one or more liver-targeted applications of the GalXC RNAi technology.
In addition, we are exploring applications of our RNAi technology, GalXC-Plus, against therapeutic gene targets expressed in tissues other than the liver, including targets expressed in the CNS, muscle tissue, adipose tissue, tumor-associated immune cells, and other tissues. We have achieved significant gene target knockdown (i.e., reduction in the expression of target mRNA activity and disease biomarker activity) in multiple cell types and regions of the CNS and other extrahepatic tissues, in both rodents and nonhuman primates. These extrahepatic applications are based on proprietary modifications to our well-characterized, clinical-stage GalXC platform that enable extrahepatic delivery and pharmacological activity.
On August 6, 2020, we presented our first preclinical data related to our GalXC-Plus RNAi technology in CNS, skeletal muscle, and adipose tissues. Results from preclinical studies demonstrated consistent and durable CNS-wide target mRNA knockdown using novel constructs regardless of route of administration (intrathecal [IT] or intracisterna magna [ICM]), and reduction in target mRNA in skeletal muscle and adipose tissue using optimized chemistries, resulting in equivalent and potentially highly durable target knockdown regardless of dosing regimens.
Status of Dicerna Programs
Our current core GalXC RNAi platform development programs are as follows:
Nedosiran for Primary Hyperoxaluria
Nedosiran is our lead investigational product candidate for the treatment of PH type 1 (“PH1”), PH type 2 (“PH2”), and PH type 3 (“PH3”) and is derived from our GalXC platform technology. PH is a family of rare, life-threatening genetic liver disorders characterized by the overproduction of oxalate, a highly insoluble metabolic end-product that is eliminated from the body mainly by the kidneys. In patients with PH, the kidneys are unable to eliminate fully the large amount of oxalate that is produced. This accumulation of oxalate compromises the renal system, which may result in severe damage to the kidneys and other organs.
PH encompasses three genetically distinct, autosomal-recessive, inborn errors of glyoxylate metabolism characterized by the overproduction of oxalate. PH1, PH2, and PH3 are each characterized by a specific enzyme deficiency. PH1 is caused by a deficiency of glyoxylate-aminotransferase, PH2 is caused by a deficiency of glyoxylate reductase/hydroxypyruvate reductase, and PH3 is caused by a deficiency of 4-hydroxy-2-oxoglutarate aldolase. The last step in the production of oxalate in the liver involves the enzyme product of the LDHA gene, making LDHA silencing an ideal approach to blocking oxalate over-production in PH1, PH2, and PH3. Our nedosiran product candidate seeks to block production of the lactate dehydrogenase enzyme by silencing the LDHA gene, which is the final common pathway of oxalate production in the liver.
As PH is characterized by overproduction of oxalate in the liver, patients with PH are predisposed to the development of recurrent urinary tract (urolithiasis) and kidney (nephrolithiasis) stones, composed of calcium oxalate crystals formed from the excess oxalate. Stone formation is accompanied by diffuse deposits of calcium oxalate in the kidneys (nephrocalcinosis) of some patients with PH, which produces tubular toxicity, inflammation, and renal damage. This injury is compounded by the effects of renal calculi-related obstruction, frequent superimposed infections, and damage due to procedures needed to relieve stone-related obstruction. Compromised renal function can eventually result in the accumulation of oxalate in a wide range of organs including the skin, bones, eyes, and heart. In the most severe cases, symptoms start in the first year of life. A combined liver-kidney transplant may be undertaken to resolve PH1 or PH2, but it is an invasive solution with limited availability and high morbidity that requires lifelong immune suppression to prevent organ rejection. Based on the evaluation of genome sequence databases, there may be as many as 16,000 people with PH in the U.S. and major European countries.
PHYOX™1 Single-Ascending-Dose Study
Data from the complete PHYOX1 trial, a Phase 1 single-ascending-dose study of nedosiran in healthy volunteers and study participants with PH1 and PH2, showed that nedosiran was generally well-tolerated in healthy volunteers and PH participants, and no serious safety concerns were identified in this study. In addition, nedosiran administration was associated with normalization or near-normalization of urinary oxalate (“Uox”) levels in 14 of 18 participants with PH1 or PH2 following a single dose. We define normal and near-normal Uox as below 0.46 mmol/1.73m2 BSA/24 hr and from 0.46 to 0.6 mmol/1.73m2 BSA/24 hr, respectively.
PHYOX2 Multidose, Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Pivotal Trial
PHYOX2 is a Phase 2 multidose, double-blind, 2:1 randomized, placebo-controlled pivotal trial of nedosiran delivered as a once-monthly subcutaneous injection in participants 6 and older who have PH1 or PH2. This global trial includes countries across North America, Europe, and other regions, including Japan, Australia, and New Zealand. The primary endpoint of the study is the percent change from baseline in area under the curve of 24-hour Uox excretion between Days 90 and 180. Enrollment in the PHYOX2 trial has successfully completed globally and we anticipate the last patient to complete this study in the first half of 2021. We expect to report top-line results from the study in mid-2021 and anticipate submitting a New Drug Application (“NDA”) near the end of the third quarter of 2021.
Commercial readiness activities continue across the organization to ensure the timing of appropriate infrastructure, processes, and capabilities to support Dicerna’s evolution to a fully integrated biopharmaceutical company. The primary focus is on U.S. commercialization infrastructure for nedosiran and the Medical Affairs and Commercial teams that have been established. Additional infrastructure and commercialization activities are paced to the PHYOX programs and NDA preparations. Outside the U.S., active discussions for regional and/or multinational commercial collaboration partners are underway.
PHYOX3 Long-Term, Multidose, Open-Label Extension Study
Following positive Phase 1 data from PHYOX1 in 2019, we received clearance to proceed with the pivotal trial (PHYOX2) and PHYOX3, a long-term, multidose, open-label, extension study of nedosiran in PH. Unlike the PHYOX2 trial, which requires screening and enrollment of new participants, patients are permitted to transition into the PHYOX3 trial from any previous nedosiran trial in which they have participated and completed.
The primary endpoint of PHYOX3 is to evaluate the impact of monthly nedosiran administration on the annual rate of decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate, a measure of kidney function. The PHYOX3 trial will also evaluate the long-term effect of nedosiran on Uox excretion, new stone formation, progression of nephrocalcinosis, and the potential to enable the gradual decrease or elimination of patients’ supportive hyperhydration therapies.
Additional PHYOX Trials: PHYOX4, PHYOX7, PHYOX8, and PHYOX-OBX
Given the fluid nature of the COVID-19 pandemic and the evolving and extraordinary actions undertaken by clinical trial sites globally, we continue to evaluate our clinical plans related to nedosiran. At this time, the status of additional PHYOX trials is as follows:
•PHYOX4: Enrollment in a study of patients with PH3 began in January 2021 and the first patient was dosed in February 2021. We anticipate top-line results from the study mid-year 2021.
•PHYOX7: A study of PH1 and PH2 patients with severe renal impairment, including those in dialysis, is expected to begin in the first quarter of 2021.
•PHYOX8: An open-label study in PH1 and PH2 patients aged 0-5 years with relatively intact renal function is expected to begin in the second quarter of 2021.
•PHYOX-OBX: We initiated an observational study in the third quarter of 2020 in participants with PH3 to evaluate the association between Uox excretion and the rate of kidney stone formation. Enrollment of participants in this study is expected in the first quarter of 2021.
RG6346 for Chronic Hepatitis B Virus Infection
Our GalXC RNAi product candidate for the treatment of chronic HBV infection, RG6346, is currently being tested in a Phase 1 clinical trial. HBV is the world’s most common serious liver infection and affects an estimated 292 million people worldwide. Chronic HBV infection is characterized by the presence of the HBV surface antigen (“HBsAg”) for six months or more.
The Phase 1 trial is a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study designed to evaluate the safety and tolerability of RG6346 in healthy volunteers and in patients with non-cirrhotic chronic HBV. Secondary objectives are to characterize the pharmacokinetic profile of RG6346 and to evaluate preliminary pharmacodynamic effects on markers of HBV antiviral efficacy, including reductions of HBsAg and HBV DNA levels in blood. The Phase 1 clinical trial is divided into three phases or groups:
•Group A is a single-ascending-dose arm in which 30 healthy volunteers received a dose of RG6346.
•Group B is a single-dose arm in which eight participants with chronic HBV who are naïve to nucleoside analog (“NUC”) therapy received a 3.0 mg/kg dose of RG6346 or placebo.
•Group C is a multiple-ascending-dose arm in which RG6346 (1.5, 3.0, or 6.0 mg/kg) or placebo was administered to 18 participants with chronic HBV who are already being treated with NUCs.
To be optimally positioned to develop and commercialize RG6346 in combination with other novel drugs, we entered into a research collaboration and licensing agreement with Roche in October 2019. Under the terms of the agreement, we are leading the development of RG6346 through the current Phase 1 trial, and pending favorable results, Roche intends to further develop RG6346 with the overall goal of developing a combination regimen to achieve a functional cure of chronic HBV in combination with additional Roche product candidates. We expect Roche to initiate RG6346 in a Phase 2 combination trial for the treatment of chronic HBV infection in the first quarter of 2021.
Belcesiran (DCR-A1AT) for Alpha-1 Antitrypsin Deficiency-Associated Liver Disease
Our GalXC RNAi product candidate for the treatment of AATLD, belcesiran, is currently being tested in a Phase 1 clinical study. AAT deficiency is a rare, genetic, inherited condition that can lead to liver disease in children and adults and lung disease in adults. The condition is caused by mutations in the SERPINA1 gene. In people with AATLD, the liver produces an abnormal version of the AAT protein, which is prone to aggregation in the liver. This accumulation of mutated AAT in the liver can lead to liver disease. Individuals with AATLD also have an increased risk of having lung disease.
Research suggests that people who have the pair of gene variants called “ZZ” are most commonly identified as having AATLD. Recent epidemiology research indicates that approximately 120,000 individuals in Europe and 63,000 individuals in the U.S. carry this ZZ genotype; the genotype occurs more/most frequently in individuals of Northern European descent. Although most individuals with this pair will not develop liver disease, some will. Recent work indicates that the current diagnosis rate for AATLD in individuals with the ZZ genotype is approximately 10%, but that liver disease may remain under-diagnosed. AATLD can affect infants, children, and adults. Liver transplantation is currently the only effective treatment for AATLD.
Our Phase 1 trial of belcesiran is an ongoing placebo-controlled study designed to evaluate the safety and tolerability of single doses of belcesiran when administered to healthy adult participants. Secondary objectives are to characterize the pharmacokinetic profile of belcesiran, and to evaluate the preliminary pharmacodynamic effects on serum AAT protein concentrations. We expect to initiate a Phase 2 trial in the first half of 2021 and expect to present data from the Phase 1 trial in healthy volunteers in 2021.
In April 2020, we entered into the Alnylam Collaboration Agreement. Under the Alnylam Collaboration Agreement, Alnylam’s ALN-AAT02 and Dicerna’s belcesiran would be explored for the treatment of AATLD at our cost, and we had the option to progress one or both of these investigational medicines through clinical development. We selected belcesiran to advance in development for the treatment of patients with AATLD.
DCR-AUD for Alcohol Use Disorder
We are currently pursuing development of DCR-AUD for the treatment of alcohol use disorder (“AUD”). DCR-AUD is an investigational therapy based on Dicerna’s GalXC technology for the treatment of AUD. DCR-AUD specifically knocks down ALDH2 gene expression in the liver, which plays a key role in alcohol metabolism. Inhibition of ALDH2 may help individuals with AUD avoid harmful levels of alcohol use.
AUD is a chronic condition characterized by compulsive alcohol use, loss of control over alcohol use, and a negative emotional state when not using alcohol. A range of medical, psychological, social, economic, and personal problems are associated with AUD. It is estimated that 14 million adults in the U.S. are living with AUD. With nearly 100,000 deaths annually, it is one of the leading preventable causes of death in the U.S.
Our goal is to submit an Investigational New Drug (“IND”) or Clinical Trial Application (“CTA”) filing in mid-2021 and initiate a subsequent Phase 1 single-ascending-dose trial in healthy volunteers in the third quarter of 2021.
Collaborative Program Updates
Eli Lilly and Company
During the first quarter of 2020, Lilly selected LY3819469, a GalXC molecule for the second collaboration target in cardiometabolic disease that targets the LPA gene, for advancement into preclinical development. We expect Lilly to file an IND for LY3819469 in the second quarter of 2021. Another GalXC molecule, LY3849889, is currently in preclinical development, and we expect Lilly to file an IND for LY3849889 in the first quarter of 2022.
Lilly filed an IND and initiated a Phase 1 study of LY3561774, a GalXC molecule for the first collaboration target in cardiometabolic disease that targets the ANGPTL3 gene for the treatment of dyslipidemia, in the fourth quarter of 2020. As a result of this filing, we achieved a milestone associated with the first filing of an IND with the FDA, entitling us to a $10.0 million payment.
In February 2021, Lilly notified us of their decision to extend for an additional year the initial research collaboration term for the extrahepatic targets subject to the Lilly Collaboration Agreement. Under the agreement between the companies, Lilly has the option to extend the three-year initial research collaboration term for these extrahepatic targets for up to three consecutive one-year periods. This first extension allows the research program for these extrahepatic targets under the collaboration between the two companies to continue through October 2022.
Novo Nordisk
During the fourth quarter of 2020, Novo nominated its first candidate under the Novo Collaboration Agreement. In conjunction with the nomination of the first development candidate, Dicerna earned a $2.5 million milestone, which we received in February 2021. Also during the fourth quarter of 2020, Dicerna met its obligation to deliver GalXC molecules for a defined number of targets for the first year of the Novo Collaboration Agreement, entitling us to a $25.0 million payment. This payment was received in February 2021.
Critical Accounting Policies and Significant Judgments and Estimates
Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations is based on our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. The preparation of our consolidated financial statements requires us to make estimates and apply judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements, as well as the revenue and expenses incurred during the reported periods. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other factors that we believe are reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ from these estimates and could have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
While our significant accounting policies are more fully described in the notes to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, we believe the following accounting policies are the most critical to understanding the judgments and estimates applied in our reported financial results.
Revenue recognition
We generate revenue from research collaboration and license agreements with third party customers. Goods and services in the agreements typically include (i) the grant of licenses for the use of our technology and (ii) the provision of services associated with the research and development of collaborative partner product candidates. Such agreements may provide for consideration to us in the form of upfront payments, research and development services, option payments, milestone payments, and royalty payments on licensed products.
We account for a contract when (i) we have approval and commitment from both parties, (ii) the rights of the parties are identified, (iii) payment terms are identified, (iv) the contract has commercial substance, and (v) collectability of consideration is probable.
In determining the appropriate amount of revenue to be recognized as we fulfill our obligations under each of our collaboration agreements, management completes the following steps: (i) identifies the contract(s) with a customer; (ii) identifies the performance obligations in the contract; (iii) measures the transaction price, including whether there are any constraints on variable consideration; (iv) allocates the transaction price to the performance obligations; and (v) recognizes revenue when (or as) we satisfy each performance obligation.
In order to account for our contracts with customers, we identify the promised goods or services in the contract and evaluate whether such promised goods or services represent performance obligations. We account for those components as separate performance obligations when the following criteria are met:
•the customer can benefit from the good or service either on its own or together with other resources that are readily available to the customer, and
•our promise to transfer the good or service to the customer is separately identifiable from other promises in the contract.
This evaluation requires subjective determinations and requires us to make judgments about the promised goods and services and whether such goods and services are separable from the other aspects of the contractual relationship. In determining the performance obligations, we evaluate certain criteria, including whether the promised good or service is capable of being distinct and whether such good or service is distinct within the context of the contract, based on consideration of the relevant facts and circumstances for each arrangement. Factors considered in this determination include the research, manufacturing, and commercialization capabilities of the partner; the availability of research and manufacturing expertise in the general marketplace; and the level of integration, interrelation, and interdependence among the promises to transfer goods or services.
At contract inception, we determine the standalone selling price for each performance obligation identified in the contract. If an observable price of the promised good or service sold separately is not readily available, we utilize assumptions that require judgment to determine the standalone selling price for each performance obligation identified in the underlying contract, which may include development timelines, probabilities of technical and regulatory success, reimbursement rates for personnel costs, forecasted revenues, potential limitations to the selling price of the product, expected technological life of the product, and discount rates. The transaction price is allocated among the performance obligations using the relative selling price method, and the applicable revenue recognition criteria are applied to each of the separate performance obligations.
The Company applies judgment in determining whether a combined performance obligation is satisfied at a point in time or over time, and, if over time, concluding upon the appropriate method of measuring progress to be applied for purposes of recognizing revenue. The Company evaluates the measure of progress each reporting period and, as estimates related to the measure of progress change, related revenue recognition is adjusted accordingly. Changes in the Company’s estimated measure of progress are accounted for on a cumulative catch-up basis as a change in accounting estimate and are recorded through earnings in the period of adjustment.
Licenses of intellectual property: If a license granted to a customer to use our intellectual property is determined to be distinct from the other performance obligations identified in the arrangement, we recognize revenue from consideration allocated to the license when the license is transferred to the licensee and the licensee is able to use and benefit from the license. For licenses that are bundled with other promises, we apply judgment to assess the nature of the combined performance obligation to determine whether the combined performance obligation is satisfied over time or at a point in time and, if over time, to conclude upon the appropriate method of measuring progress for purposes of recognizing revenue related to consideration allocated to the performance obligation. We evaluate the measure of progress each reporting period and, if necessary, adjust the measure of performance and related revenue recognition.
Milestone payments: At the inception of each contract with a customer that includes research, development, or regulatory milestone payments, we evaluate whether the milestones are considered probable of being reached and estimate the amount to be included in the transaction price using the most likely amount method. If it is probable that a significant revenue reversal would not occur, the associated milestone value is included in the transaction price. Milestone payments that are not within our control or of the licensee, such as regulatory approvals, are assessed as to the probability of achieving the related milestones. At the end of each subsequent reporting period, we reevaluate the probability of achievement of all milestones and any related constraint, and, if necessary, adjust the estimate of the overall transaction price. Any such adjustments are recorded on a cumulative catch-up basis and are recorded as revenue and through earnings in the period of adjustment.
Options: Customer options, such as options granted to allow a licensee to choose to research and develop additional product candidates or reserve product candidates against target genes to be identified in the future, or options that allow a customer to designate a target as a lead product, are evaluated at contract inception in order to determine whether those options provide a material right (i.e., an optional good or service offered for free or at a discount) to the customer. If the customer option represents a material right, the material right is treated as a separate performance obligation at the outset of the arrangement. The Company allocates the transaction price to material rights based on the standalone selling price, and revenue is recognized when or as the future goods or services are transferred or when the option expires. Customer options that are not material rights do not give rise to separate performance obligations, and as such, the additional consideration that would result from a customer exercising an option in the future is not included in the transaction price for the current contract. Instead, the option is deemed a marketing offer, and additional option fee payments are recognized or begin being recognized as revenue when the licensee exercises the options. The exercise of an option that does not represent a material right is treated as a separate contract for accounting purposes.
Research and development services: Arrangements that include a promise to provide research or development services at the licensee’s discretion are assessed to determine whether the services provide a material right to the licensee and are capable of being distinct, are not highly interdependent or do not significantly modify one another, and if so, the services are accounted for as separate performance obligations as the services are provided to the customer. Otherwise, when research or development services are determined not to be capable of being distinct or distinct within the context of the contract, those services are combined with the performance obligation that includes the underlying license.
Royalties: For arrangements that include sales-based royalties, including commercial milestone payments based on the achievement of a specified level of sales, and when the license is deemed to be the predominant item to which the royalties relate, we recognize revenue at the later of (i) when the related sales occur, or (ii) when the performance obligation to which some or all of the royalty has been allocated has been satisfied (or partially satisfied). To date, we have not recognized any royalty revenue resulting from any out-licensing arrangement.
We receive payments from our licensees as established in each contract. Upfront payments and fees are recorded as deferred revenue upon receipt or when due and may require deferral of revenue recognition to a future period until (or as) we satisfy our performance obligations under these arrangements. Where applicable, amounts are recorded as contracts receivable when our right to consideration is unconditional. We do not assess whether a contract with a customer has a significant financing component if the expectation at contract inception is such that the period between payment by the licensees and the transfer of the promised goods or services to the licensees will be one year or less.
Stock-based compensation
Our stock-based compensation programs grant awards which may include stock options, restricted common stock, rights to acquire stock, and other stock-based awards. Stock-based compensation cost is measured at the grant date based on the fair value of the award and is recognized as expense over the requisite service period, which generally represents the vesting period, and includes an estimate of the awards that will be forfeited.
We estimate the fair values of stock options granted to our employees and non-employees on the grant date, rights to acquire stock granted under our Employee Stock Purchase Plan, and the resulting stock-based compensation expense, using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The Black-Scholes option-pricing model requires the use of judgment to develop input assumptions, some of which are highly subjective, including: (i) the fair value of our common stock on the date of grant; (ii) the expected volatility of our stock; (iii) the expected term of the award; (iv) the risk-free interest rate; and (v) expected dividends. In applying these assumptions, we consider the following factors:
Fair Value of Common Stock: We use the market closing price for our common stock on the date of grant to determine the fair value of our common stock on the date of grant.
Expected Term: The expected term assumption represents the weighted average period the stock options are expected to be outstanding. We use the simplified method to calculate the expected term for options granted to employees, as our stock option grants are considered “plain vanilla” and we do not have sufficient historical exercise data to provide a reasonable basis upon which to estimate the expected term due to the limited period of time our common stock has been publicly traded. The simplified method calculates the expected term as the average time-to-vesting and the contractual life of the options. We plan to continue to use the simplified method until we have sufficient exercise history as a publicly-traded company.
Expected Volatility: Due to the lack of company-specific historical and implied volatility data, we base our estimate of expected volatility on the historical volatility of a group of similar companies that are publicly traded. The historical volatility is calculated based on a period of time commensurate with the expected term assumption. The computation of expected volatility is based on the historical volatility using the daily closing prices of a representative group of companies with similar characteristics to us, including stage of life cycle, financial leverage, enterprise value, risk profiles, and position within the industry, along with historical share price information sufficient to meet the expected life of the stock-based awards. We believe the group selected has sufficient similar economic and industry characteristics and includes companies that are most representative of our company. We intend to continue to consistently apply this process using the same or similar public companies until a sufficient amount of historical information regarding the volatility of our own common stock share price becomes available, or unless circumstances change such that the identified companies are no longer similar to us, in which case, more suitable companies whose share prices are publicly available would be utilized in the calculation.
Risk-Free Interest Rate: The risk-free interest rate is based on the implied yield available on U.S. Treasury zero-coupon issues in effect at the time of grant for periods corresponding with the expected term of the option.
Expected Dividend Yield: We have never paid and have no plans to pay dividends on our common stock. Therefore, we use an expected dividend yield of zero.
Stock-based compensation expense recognized in the financial statements is based on awards that are ultimately expected to vest. Accordingly, we are also required to estimate forfeitures at the time of grant, and to revise those estimates in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from estimates. We use historical data to estimate pre-vesting option forfeitures and record stock-based compensation expense only for those awards that are expected to vest. Our forfeiture rate estimates are based on an analysis of our actual forfeiture experience, employee turnover behavior, and other factors. The impact of any adjustments to our forfeiture rates would be recorded as a cumulative adjustment in the period of adjustment. To the extent that actual forfeitures differ from our estimates, the difference is recorded as a cumulative adjustment in the period the estimates were revised.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
A summary of recent accounting pronouncements that we have adopted or expect to adopt is included in Note 2 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies to our consolidated financial statements (see Part I, Item 8 - “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K). Additional information regarding relevant accounting pronouncements is provided below.
In December 2019, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2019-12, Simplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes, amending accounting guidance that simplifies the accounting for income taxes as part of its initiative to reduce complexity in the accounting standards. The amendments eliminate certain exceptions related to the approach for intraperiod tax allocation, the methodology for calculating income taxes in an interim period, and the recognition of deferred tax liabilities for outside basis differences. The amendments also clarify and simplify other aspects of the accounting for income taxes. For public business entities, ASU 2019-12 is required to be adopted effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2020. We are currently evaluating the effect this standard will have on our financial statements and related disclosures.
Adopted in 2020
Measurement of Credit Losses
In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments. The FASB subsequently issued amendments to ASU 2016-13 which had the same effective date as ASU 2016-13 of January 1, 2020. These standards require that credit losses be reported using an expected losses model rather than the incurred losses model that was previously used, and establish additional disclosures related to credit risks associated with financial assets. The adoption of this standard did not have a significant impact on our financial statements but required additional disclosures.
Adopted in 2019
Leases
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842), as amended by multiple standards updates, in order to increase transparency and comparability among organizations by requiring lessees to recognize most leases on their balance sheets and making targeted changes to lessor accounting. The most significant change arising from the new standard is the recognition of right-of-use (“ROU”) assets and lease liabilities for leases classified as operating leases. Under the standard, disclosures are required to enable financial statement users to assess the amount, timing, and uncertainty of cash flows arising from the leases. Companies are also required to recognize and measure leases existing at, or entered into after, the adoption date using a modified retrospective approach, with certain practical expedients available. Comparative periods prior to adoption have not been retrospectively adjusted.
We adopted this standard on January 1, 2019 and elected the package of three practical expedients that permitted an entity not to (a) reassess whether expired or existing contracts contain leases, (b) reassess lease classification for existing or expired leases, and (c) consider whether previously capitalized initial direct costs would be appropriate under the new standard. Initial implementation of the standard did not have a material impact on our financial statements but required additional disclosures.
Financial Operations Overview
Revenue
Our revenue to date has been generated primarily through research funding, license fees and other upfront payments, option exercise fees, milestone payments, and preclinical development activities, and research activities under our research collaboration and license arrangements with Novo, Roche, Lilly, Alexion, and BI. We have not generated any commercial product revenue, nor do we expect to generate any product revenue in the near-term.
In the future, we may generate revenue from a combination of research and development payments, license fees and other upfront payments, milestone payments, product sales, and royalties in connection with our current or future collaborations with partners, and product sales from our internally developed products. We expect that any revenue we generate will fluctuate in future periods as a result of the timing of our or our collaborators’ achievement of preclinical, clinical, regulatory, and commercialization milestones, to the extent achieved, the timing and amount of any payments to us relating to such milestones, and the extent to which any of our product candidates are approved and successfully commercialized by us or a collaborator. Delays in or changes to the research and development plans and timelines related to our collaboration agreements are likely due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Because we recognize the majority of our collaboration revenue on a cost-to-cost measure of progress, revenues recognized in the near-term may be lower than originally anticipated and could be recognized over an extended period of time as a result.
Research and development expenses
Research and development expenses consist of costs associated with our research activities, including discovery and development of our molecules and drug delivery technologies, clinical and preclinical development activities, and research activities under our research collaboration and license agreements. Our research and development expenses include:
• direct research and development expenses incurred under arrangements with third parties, such as contract research organizations, contract manufacturing organizations, and consultants;
• platform-related lab expenses, including discovery research, lab supplies, license fees, and consultants;
• employee-related expenses, including salaries, benefits, and stock-based compensation expense; and
• facilities, depreciation, and other allocated expenses, which include direct and allocated expenses for rent and maintenance of facilities, depreciation of leasehold improvements and equipment, and laboratory and other supplies.
We expense research and development costs as they are incurred. We account for non-refundable advance payments for goods and services that will be used in future research and development activities as expenses when the service has been performed or when the goods have been received. A significant portion of our research and development costs are not tracked by project, as they benefit multiple projects or our technology platform.
Delays in or changes to our research and development plans and timelines, which impact both our internal and external resources, have occurred and may continue to occur due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Internally, we have been impacted by mandatory work from home edicts directed by the local governments in the jurisdictions in which we operate. However, essential work exemptions continue to permit critical research and development and laboratory activities for limited personnel. Those exemptions enable some continued discovery research and activities supporting our collaborative agreements and our own programs. We also anticipate that the timing of hiring additional personnel may shift into later periods than initially anticipated. Externally, a number of our clinical trial sites have delayed and may continue to delay trial-related activities as a result of COVID-19. Any of these factors could cause the timing of the research and development expenses we expect to incur to shift into later periods and have the potential to cause us to expend more funds than originally contemplated as a result of needing to extend clinical development activities.
General and administrative expenses
General and administrative expenses consist primarily of salaries and related benefits, including stock-based compensation, related to our executive, finance, legal, business development, commercial, and support functions. Other general and administrative expenses include travel expenses, professional legal fees (excluding litigation expenses), audit, tax, and other professional services, and allocated facility-related costs not otherwise included in research and development expenses.
Litigation expense
Litigation expense consists of legal fees and expenses solely related to litigation with Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“Alnylam”).
Other income (expense)
Other income (expense) consists primarily of interest income. Interest income consists of income earned on our cash and cash equivalents, held-to-maturity investments, and restricted cash equivalents. We expect that interest income will continue to decrease due to recent decreases in interest rates. Other income (expense) also includes expense recorded for the derivative liability established for contingent royalty and milestone payments that may be owed to Alnylam in the future under the terms of our collaboration agreement.
Results of Operations
Comparison of the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019
The following table summarizes the results of our operations for the periods indicated (amounts in thousands, except percentages):
YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31,
2020 2019 $ CHANGE % CHANGE
Revenue $ 164,307 $ 23,904 $ 140,403 *
Operating expenses:
Research and development 205,384 109,339 96,045 87.8 %
General and administrative 72,131 42,751 29,380 68.7 %
Total operating expenses 277,515 152,090 125,425 82.5 %
Loss from operations (113,208) (128,186) 14,978 (11.7) %
Other income (expense):
Interest income 6,011 7,537 (1,526) (20.2) %
Interest expense (20) (3) (17) *
Other (expense) income (5,530) 193 (5,723) *
Total other income, net 461 7,727 (7,266) (94.0) %
Net loss $ (112,747) $ (120,459) $ 7,712 (6.4) %
* Percentage change not meaningful
Revenue
The following tables provide a summary of revenue recognized (amounts in thousands):
YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31,
2020 2019 $ CHANGE % CHANGE
Novo $ 13,874 $ - $ 13,874 100.0 %
Roche 73,927 - 73,927 100.0 %
Lilly 41,529 13,127 28,402 216.4 %
Alexion 32,243 4,405 27,838 *
BI 2,734 6,297 (3,563) (56.6) %
Other - 75 (75) (100.0) %
Total $ 164,307 $ 23,904 $ 140,403 *
* Percentage change not meaningful
Revenue primarily includes amounts recognized on upfront and milestone payments. The increase in revenue for the year ended December 31, 2020 is primarily attributable to increased activities and associated costs under the recent collaboration agreement with Roche, as well as under the Alexion and Lilly collaboration agreements, as all three agreements are recognized as revenue on a cost-to-cost measure of progress method.
Research and development expenses
The following table summarizes our research and development expenses incurred during the periods indicated (amounts in thousands, except percentages):
YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31,
2020 2019 $ CHANGE % CHANGE
Belcesiran direct research and development expenses $ 14,487 $ 9,652 $ 4,835 50.1 %
Nedosiran direct research and development expenses 42,583 28,736 13,847 48.2 %
Partner and additional core programs direct research and development expenses 57,113 21,045 36,068 171.4 %
Total direct research and development expenses 114,183 59,433 54,750 92.1 %
Platform-related and other discovery expenses 15,025 13,222 1,803 13.6 %
Employee-related expenses 64,116 31,173 32,943 105.7 %
Facilities, depreciation, and other expenses 12,060 5,511 6,549 118.8 %
Total $ 205,384 $ 109,339 $ 96,045 87.8 %
Research and development expenses increased $96.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2020 compared to the year ended December 31, 2019 primarily due to a $54.8 million increase in direct research and development expenses. Direct research and development expenses include expenses incurred under arrangements with third parties, such as contract research organizations, contract manufacturing organizations, and consultants. The $54.8 million increase in total direct research and development expenses for the year ended December 31, 2020 is primarily due to a $36.1 million increase in partner and additional core programs direct research and development expenses, which includes increases of $16.3 million in manufacturing costs and $13.5 million in other direct research and development costs, largely reflective of increased activities primarily associated with our collaborations with Lilly, Alexion, and Novo. Total direct research and development expenses were also impacted by $13.8 million and $4.8 million increases in nedosiran and belcesiran direct research and development expenses, respectively.
Research and development expenses were also impacted by a $32.9 million increase in employee-related expenses, which includes salaries, benefits, and stock-based compensation. The increase in employee-related expenses is a result of an increase in research and development headcount necessary to support our collaboration agreements and expanding pipeline.
We expect our overall research and development expenses to continue to increase for the foreseeable future as we ramp our clinical manufacturing activities, continue clinical activities associated with our core product candidates, and continue activities under our existing collaboration agreements.
General and administrative expenses
General and administrative expenses were $72.1 million and $42.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively. General and administrative expenses increased $29.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2020 compared to the year ended December 31, 2019, primarily due to a $20.6 million increase in employee-related compensation, including salaries, benefits, and stock-based compensation, due to an increase in headcount necessary to support our growing operations. In addition, professional consulting services increased $6.0 million in the year ended December 31, 2020.
We expect general and administrative expenses to continue to increase in the foreseeable future, largely due to investments in staffing and market readiness activities.
Other income (expense)
Total other income (expense) decreased $7.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2020 compared to the year ended December 31, 2019, primarily due to $6.0 million of expense recorded for the derivative liability established for contingent royalty and milestone payments that may be owed to Alnylam in the future under the terms of our collaboration agreement.
Comparison of the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018
The following table summarizes the results of our operations for the periods indicated (amounts in thousands, except percentages):
YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31,
2019 2018 $ CHANGE % CHANGE
Revenue
$ 23,904 $ 6,176 $ 17,728 287.0 %
Operating expenses:
Research and development 109,339 45,711 63,628 139.2 %
General and administrative 42,751 21,685 21,066 97.1 %
Litigation expense - 29,132 (29,132) (100.0) %
Total operating expenses
152,090 96,528 55,562 57.6 %
Loss from operations
(128,186) (90,352) (37,834) 41.9 %
Other income (expense):
Interest income 7,537 2,102 5,435 258.6 %
Interest expense (3) (603) 600 (99.5) %
Other income 193 - 193 100.0 %
Total other income, net
7,727 1,499 6,228 415.5 %
Net loss $ (120,459) $ (88,853) $ (31,606) 35.6 %
Revenue
For the year ended December 31, 2019, revenue reflects $13.1 million, $4.4 million, and $6.3 million from the Lilly, Alexion and BI collaborations, respectively, compared to $0.1 million and $6.1 million from the Alexion and BI collaborations, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2018. The increases in Lilly and Alexion revenue for the year ended December 31, 2019 reflect increased activities under each agreement, as both agreements are recognized as revenue on a cost-to-cost measure of progress method. No revenue was recognized under the Novo and Roche agreements during the year ended December 31, 2019, as work had not yet commenced under either agreement.
Research and development expenses
The following table summarizes our research and development expenses incurred during the periods indicated (amounts in thousands, except percentages):
YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31,
2019 2018 $ CHANGE % CHANGE
Belcesiran direct research and development expenses $ 9,652 $ 2,365 $ 7,287 308.1 %
Nedosiran direct research and development expenses 28,736 15,186 13,550 89.2 %
Partner and additional core programs direct research and development expenses 21,045 5,361 15,684 292.6 %
Total direct research and development expenses 59,433 22,912 36,521 159.4 %
Platform-related and other discovery expenses 13,222 6,325 6,897 109.0 %
Employee-related expenses 31,173 13,130 18,043 137.4 %
Facilities, depreciation, and other expenses 5,511 3,344 2,167 64.8 %
Total $ 109,339 $ 45,711 $ 63,628 139.2 %
Research and development expenses increased $63.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2019 compared to the year ended December 31, 2018 primarily due to a $36.5 million increase in direct research and development expenses. Direct research and development expenses include expenses incurred under arrangements with third parties, such as contract research organizations, contract manufacturing organizations, and consultants. The $36.5 million increase in total direct research and development expenses for the year ended December 31, 2019 is primarily due to a $15.7 million increase in partner and additional core programs direct research and development expenses, which includes increases of $8.3 million in manufacturing costs and $6.9 million in other direct research and development costs, largely reflective of increased activities primarily associated with our collaborations with Lilly and Alexion, as well as with RG6346 (formerly known as DCR-HBVS). Total direct research and development expenses were also impacted by $13.6 million and $7.3 million increases in nedosiran and belcesiran direct research and development expenses, respectively.
Research and development expenses were also impacted by a $18.0 million increase in employee-related expenses, which include salaries, benefits, and stock-based compensation. The increase in employee-related expenses is a result of a 124% increase in research and development headcount necessary to support our collaboration agreements and expanding pipeline. Finally, platform-related expenses increased $6.9 million primarily due to higher raw materials and lab supplies costs of $5.0 million.
General and administrative expenses
General and administrative expenses were $42.8 million and $21.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. The $21.1 million increase in general and administrative expenses is primarily due to increases of $10.0 million in employee-related compensation, including salaries, benefits, and stock-based compensation, due to a 220% increase in headcount necessary to support our growing operations. In addition, general and administrative expenses increased $5.7 million related to professional fees and consulting costs.
Litigation expense
Litigation expenses of $29.1 million recorded during the year ended December 31, 2018 are comprised solely of litigation and settlement expenses associated with the litigation with Alnylam.
Interest income
Interest income is comprised of interest earned from our money market accounts and held-to-maturity investments. Interest income was $7.5 million and $2.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. The increase was primarily due to higher held-to-maturity investments balances amounts during the year ended December 31, 2019 primarily resulting from our follow-on public offering in September 2018 and funds received from the collaboration agreements with Lilly and Alexion in the fourth quarter of 2018.
Interest expense
Interest expense of $0.6 million during the year ended December 31, 2018 represents interest expense incurred on our litigation settlement payable.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Overview
We have historically funded our operations primarily through the public offering and private placement of our securities and consideration received from our collaborative arrangements with Novo, Roche, Lilly, Alexion, and BI. As of December 31, 2020, we had cash, cash equivalents, and held-to-maturity investments of $568.8 million compared to $348.9 million as of December 31, 2019.
On November 7, 2019, we filed a universal shelf registration statement as a well-known seasoned issuer on Form S-3 permitting the sale of common stock, preferred stock, debt securities, warrants, other rights, or units. We may offer and sell these securities in one or more issuances at prices and on terms that will be determined at the time of offering.
On February 6, 2020, we issued and sold an aggregate of approximately $40.0 million of shares of our common stock to a single institutional investor pursuant to our common stock Sales Agreement with Cowen and Company, LLC as the sales agent. In this transaction, we sold an aggregate of 2,077,500 shares of common stock at a price of $19.25 per share, resulting in net proceeds of approximately $39.2 million after a deduction of approximately $0.8 million in sales commissions. The shares in the offering were sold pursuant to a shelf registration statement declared effective by the SEC on May 31, 2018 and a prospectus supplement filed with the SEC on June 1, 2018.
Payments received from our collaboration partners during the three months and year ended December 31, 2020 were as follows (amounts in thousands):
THREE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2020 YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 2020
Novo $ - $ 175,000
Roche - 201,981
Lilly 10,000 10,000
Alexion 7,500 22,594
BI - 260
Total $ 17,500 $ 409,835
We believe that our cash, cash equivalents, and held-to-maturity investments provide us with sufficient resources to continue our planned operations and clinical activities into 2023.
Cash flows
The following table shows a summary of our consolidated cash flows for the periods indicated (amounts in thousands):
YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31,
2020 2019 2018
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities $ 175,112 $ (692) $ 18,298
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities $ (258,860) $ 49,531 $ (202,731)
Net cash provided by financing activities $ 59,423 $ 52,888 $ 169,883
Operating activities
Net cash provided by operating activities was $175.1 million compared to net cash used in operating activities of $0.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively. The $175.8 million increase in net cash provided by operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2020 was primarily due to a $266.0 million decrease in contract receivables largely due to the receipt of upfront cash payments received from our collaborative partners in 2020. This increase was offset by a decrease in deferred revenue of $132.0 million associated with our collaboration agreements.
Net cash used in operating activities was $0.7 million compared to net cash provided by operating activities of $18.3 million for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. The $19.0 million decrease in net cash provided by operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2019 was primarily due to an increased operating loss of $31.6 million. The decrease in cash was also impacted by a $21.0 million decrease in the litigation settlement payable as a result of the change in year over year activity. These decreases were offset by an increase in deferred revenue of $37.9 million associated with our collaboration agreements.
Investing activities
Net cash used in investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2020 was $258.9 million, compared to net cash provided by investing activities of $49.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2019. The decrease of $308.4 million in net cash used in investing activities during 2020 primarily relates to a $540.0 million increase in purchases of held-to-maturity investments that were partially offset by a $237.0 million increase in proceeds from the maturities of held-to-maturity investments.
Net cash provided by investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2019 was $49.5 million, compared to net cash used in investing activities of $202.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2018. The decrease of $252.3 million in net cash used in investing activities during 2019 primarily relates to a $337.0 million increase in proceeds from the maturities of held-to-maturity investments that were partially offset by a $78.7 million increase in purchases of held-to-maturity investments.
Financing activities
Net cash provided by financing activities was $59.4 million and $52.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively. The increase of $6.5 million in cash provided by financing activities is due to a $39.2 million increase in proceeds from the issuance of common stock to an institutional investor and a $13.3 million increase in proceeds from the exercise of stock options and issuance of common stock under our Employee Stock Purchase Program. These increases were partially offset by a $45.8 million decrease in proceeds from the issuance of common stock to our collaboration partners.
Net cash provided by financing activities was $52.9 million and $169.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. The decrease in cash provided by financing activities of $117.0 million was primarily due to the receipt of $108.1 million in net proceeds in September 2018 from a follow-on public offering of our common stock.
Funding requirements
We expect that our primary uses of capital will continue to be commercialization readiness and launch activities, subject to approval of our development candidates; third-party clinical research and development services and manufacturing costs; compensation and related expenses; laboratory and related supplies; legal and other regulatory expenses; and general overhead costs. Because of the numerous risks and uncertainties associated with the development and commercialization of our product candidates and the extent to which we may enter into additional collaborations with third parties to participate in their development and commercialization, we are unable to estimate the amounts of capital outlays and operating expenditures associated with our anticipated development activities. However, based on our current operating plan, we believe that our available cash, cash equivalents, held-to-maturity investments, and anticipated milestone and other payments from existing collaborations will be sufficient to fund the execution of our current clinical and operating plans into 2023. We based this estimate on assumptions that may prove to be incorrect, and we could utilize our available capital resources sooner than we currently expect. In addition, through the year ending December 31, 2021, we forecast receiving over $100.0 million in cash from our collaborations (inclusive of the receipt of $17.5 million in the three months ended December 31, 2020), including anticipated milestone achievement, based on the current terms in our collaboration agreements and anticipated timing of development in our programs covered by such collaborations. There can be no assurance that we will actually receive such payments under our collaboration agreements.
Our forecast of the period of time through which our financial resources will be adequate to support our operations is a forward-looking statement that involves risks and uncertainties, and actual results could vary materially as a result of a number of factors. Our future capital requirements are difficult to forecast and will depend on many factors, including:
•the potential receipt of any milestone payments under the Novo Collaboration Agreement, Roche Collaboration Agreement, Lilly Collaboration Agreement, Alexion Collaboration Agreement, BI Agreements, and Alnylam Collaboration Agreement and the potential payment of any royalties under the Alnylam Collaboration Agreement;
•the potential payment or receipt of royalty payments under the Alnylam Cross-License Agreement;
•the terms and timing of any other collaboration, licensing, and other arrangements that we may establish;
•the initiation, progress, timing, and completion of preclinical studies and clinical trials for our current and future potential product candidates, including the impact of COVID-19 on our ongoing and planned research and development efforts and the timing of a potential commercial launch date for nedosiran;
•our alignment with the FDA on regulatory approval requirements;
•the impact of COVID-19 on the operations of key governmental agencies, such as the FDA, which may delay the development of our current product candidates or any future product candidates;
•the number and characteristics of product candidates that we pursue;
•the outcome, timing, and cost of regulatory approvals;
•delays that may be caused by changing regulatory requirements;
•the cost and timing of hiring new employees to support our continued growth;
•the costs involved in filing and prosecuting patent applications and enforcing and defending patent claims;
•the costs of filing and prosecuting intellectual property rights and enforcing and defending any intellectual property-related claims;
•the costs of responding to and defending ourselves against complaints and potential litigation;
•the costs and timing of procuring clinical and commercial supplies for our product candidates;
•the extent to which we acquire or in-license other product candidates and technologies; and
•the extent to which we acquire or invest in other businesses, product candidates, or technologies.
Until such time, if ever, that we generate product revenue, we expect to finance our future cash needs through a combination of public or private equity offerings, debt financings, potential royalty stream monetization, and research collaboration and license agreements.
Please see the risk factors set forth in Part I, Item 1A - “Risk Factors” in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional risks associated with our substantial capital requirements.
Contractual Obligations and Commitments
The following is a summary of our contractual obligations as of December 31, 2020 (amounts in thousands):
Payments Due By Period*
Total Less Than
1 Year More Than
1 Year and
Less Than 3 Years
More Than
3 Years and
Less Than
5 Years More Than
5 Years
Operating lease obligations
$ 71,747 $ 7,351 $ 17,215 $ 18,263 $ 28,918
Finance lease obligations
$ 242 $ 64 $ 120 $ 58 $ -
____________________________
* Represents future minimum lease payments under our existing non-cancelable operating leases for our offices and laboratory space and our finance lease for equipment. Excluded from the table above are fixed lease payments of $24.6 million associated with our newest lease in Lexington, Massachusetts. Such lease payments were excluded, as the commencement dates have not yet occurred for accounting purposes and lease liabilities have not yet been recognized on our consolidated balance sheet.
We also have obligations to make future payments to licensors that become due and payable on the achievement of certain development, regulatory, and commercial milestones. We have not included any such potential obligations on our consolidated balance sheet or in the table above since the achievement and timing of these milestones were not probable or estimable as of December 31, 2020.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
As of December 31, 2020, we did not have any relationships with unconsolidated entities or financial partnerships, such as entities often referred to as “special purpose” entities, which would have been established for the purpose of facilitating off-balance sheet arrangements or other contractually narrow or limited purposes.

---

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
The primary objectives of our investment activities are to ensure liquidity and to preserve principal, while at the same time maximizing the income we receive from our marketable securities without significantly increasing risk. Some of the securities that we invest in may have market risk related to changes in interest rates. As of December 31, 2020, we had cash, cash equivalents, and held-to-maturity investments of $568.8 million. Our primary exposure to market risk is interest rate sensitivity, which is affected by changes in the general level of U.S. interest rates. Due to the short-term maturities of our cash and cash equivalents and held-to-maturity investments and the low risk profile of our investments, an immediate 100 basis point change in interest rates by the U.S. federal reserve would not have a material effect on the fair market value of our cash, cash equivalents, or held-to-maturity investments. To minimize the risk in the future, we intend to maintain our portfolio of cash, cash equivalents, and held-to-maturity investments in a variety of securities, including commercial paper, money market funds, and government securities.

---

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
DICERNA PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
PAGE
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2020 and 2019
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the stockholders and the Board of Directors of Dicerna Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Dicerna Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in stockholders’ equity, and cash flows, for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2020, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “financial statements”). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2020, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2020, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated February 25, 2021, expressed an unqualified opinion on the Company's internal control over financial reporting.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Critical Audit Matter
The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current-period audit of the financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that (1) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates.
Revenue from Collaborative Arrangements - Refer to Notes 2 and 8 to the financial statements.
Critical Audit Matter Description
The Company recognizes revenue upon transfer of control of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration the Company expects to receive in exchange for those goods or services. The Company’s collaboration and license agreements contain certain promises that together represent single performance obligations because the promises to transfer individual services are not distinct from other promises in the contracts.
Significant judgment is exercised by the Company in determining revenue recognition for these customer arrangements, and includes the following:
•Determining whether there are elements of an arrangement that are outside the scope of the revenue recognition guidance
•Determination of whether goods and services are considered distinct performance obligations that should be accounted for separately versus combined, such as licenses of intellectual property and related services that are sold in license and development arrangements.
•Determination of stand-alone selling prices for each distinct performance obligation and for goods and services that are not sold separately.
•Estimating the total cost of fulfilling certain performance obligations that are satisfied over time, which impacts the timing of revenue recognition for such performance obligations.
Given these factors, the related audit effort in evaluating management’s judgments in determining revenue recognition for these customer agreements was extensive and required a high degree of auditor judgment.
How the Critical Audit Matter Was Addressed in the Audit
Our principal audit procedures related to the Company’s revenue recognition for these customer agreements included the following:
•We tested the effectiveness of internal controls related to the identification of distinct performance obligations, application of the relevant accounting guidance, and the determination of the timing of revenue recognition.
•We evaluated management’s significant accounting policies related to these customer agreements for reasonableness
•For arrangements that became effective during the year ended December 31, 2020, we performed the following procedures:
◦Obtained and read contract source documents for each selection and other documents that were part of the agreement.
◦Tested management’s identification of significant terms for completeness, including the identification of distinct performance obligations and identification of elements of the arrangement subject to other accounting guidance.
◦Assessed the terms in the customer agreement and evaluated the appropriateness of management’s application of their accounting policies, along with their use of estimates, in the determination of revenue recognition conclusions.
◦We evaluated the reasonableness of management’s estimate of stand-alone selling prices for performance obligations that are not sold separately, as applicable.
•We evaluated the estimates of total contract costs to fulfill performance obligations by performing the following procedures:
◦We compared costs incurred for activities completed to date to the costs forecasted for those activities.
◦We evaluated management’s ability to achieve the estimates of total contract cost and profit by performing corroborating inquiries with the Company’s operations teams and comparing the information obtained to estimates included in the accounting records.
◦We compared management’s estimates for the selected contracts to historical experience and original budgets, when applicable.
•We tested the mathematical accuracy of management’s calculations of revenue and the associated timing of revenue recognized in the financial statements.
/s/ Deloitte & Touche
Boston, Massachusetts
February 25, 2021
We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2008.
DICERNA PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands, except share data and par value)
DECEMBER 31,
2020 2019
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS:
Cash and cash equivalents $ 126,023 $ 152,816
Held-to-maturity investments 442,820 196,065
Restricted cash equivalents, current 744 -
Contract receivables 34,713 200,354
Prepaid expenses and other current assets 14,403 6,934
Total current assets 618,703 556,169
NONCURRENT ASSETS:
Property and equipment, net 17,546 7,076
Right-of-use operating assets, net 60,843 30,102
Restricted cash equivalents, noncurrent 5,618 3,894
Other noncurrent assets 5,136 168
Total noncurrent assets 89,143 41,240
TOTAL ASSETS $ 707,846 $ 597,409
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
Accounts payable $ 7,901 $ 6,077
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities 28,061 20,042
Lease liability, current 3,439 3,358
Deferred revenue, current 138,537 212,258
Total current liabilities 177,938 241,735
NONCURRENT LIABILITIES:
Lease liability, noncurrent 48,744 20,141
Deferred revenue, noncurrent 336,236 182,730
Derivative liability 6,000 -
Other noncurrent liabilities 1,174 608
Total noncurrent liabilities 392,154 203,479
TOTAL LIABILITIES 570,092 445,214
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (NOTE 14)
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY:
Preferred stock, $0.0001 par value - 5,000,000 shares authorized; no shares issued or outstanding at December 31, 2020 or 2019
- -
Common stock, $0.0001 par value - 150,000,000 shares authorized; 75,757,213 and 71,573,196 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively
8 7
Additional paid-in capital 775,809 677,504
Accumulated deficit (638,063) (525,316)
Total stockholders’ equity 137,754 152,195
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY $ 707,846 $ 597,409
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
DICERNA PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(in thousands, except share and per share data)
YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31,
2020 2019 2018
Revenue $ 164,307 $ 23,904 $ 6,176
Operating expenses:
Research and development 205,384 109,339 45,711
General and administrative 72,131 42,751 21,685
Litigation expense - - 29,132
Total operating expenses 277,515 152,090 96,528
Loss from operations (113,208) (128,186) (90,352)
Other income (expense):
Interest income 6,011 7,537 2,102
Interest expense (20) (3) (603)
Other (expense) income (5,530) 193 -
Total other income, net 461 7,727 1,499
Net loss $ (112,747) $ (120,459) $ (88,853)
Net loss per share - basic and diluted $ (1.52) $ (1.76) $ (1.60)
Weighted average common shares outstanding - basic and diluted 74,187,251 68,428,046 55,616,092
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
DICERNA PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(in thousands, except share data)
COMMON
STOCK ADDITIONAL
PAID-IN
CAPITAL ACCUMULATED
DEFICIT TOTAL
STOCKHOLDERS’
EQUITY
SHARES AMOUNT
BALANCE - January 1, 2018 51,644,841 5 417,037 (315,956) 101,086
Proceeds from issuance of common stock from public offering, net of underwriters' commissions and offering costs of $330
8,832,565 1 107,769 - 107,770
Issuance of common stock to Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 983,208 - 10,315 - 10,315
Issuance of common stock to collaboration partners 6,250,019 1 60,411 - 60,412
Exercise of warrants to purchase common stock 45,710 - 49 - 49
Exercises of common stock options and sales of common stock under Employee Stock Purchase Plan 448,173 - 2,061 - 2,061
Vesting of restricted common stock 10,000 - - - -
Settlement of restricted stock for tax withholding (3,774) - (35) - (35)
Stock-based compensation expense - - 7,888 - 7,888
Net loss - - - (88,853) (88,853)
BALANCE - December 31, 2018 68,210,742 7 605,495 (404,809) 200,693
Exercises of common stock options and sales of common stock under Employee Stock Purchase Plan 1,082,472 - 7,402 - 7,402
Stock-based compensation expense (inclusive of the impact of adoption of ASU 2018-07) - - 18,779 43 18,822
Issuance of common stock to collaboration partners 2,279,982 - 45,828 - 45,828
Cumulative effect adjustment related to the adoption of ASC 842 - - - (91) (91)
Net loss - - - (120,459) (120,459)
BALANCE - December 31, 2019 71,573,196 7 677,504 (525,316) 152,195
Exercises of common stock options and sales of common stock under Employee Stock Purchase Plan 2,106,517 1 20,306 - 20,307
Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net of commissions and offering costs of $904
2,077,500 - 39,088 - 39,088
Stock-based compensation expense - - 38,911 - 38,911
Net loss - - - (112,747) (112,747)
BALANCE - December 31, 2020 75,757,213 8 775,809 (638,063) 137,754
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
DICERNA PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands)
YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31,
2020 2019 2018
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net loss (112,747) (120,459) $ (88,853)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
Non-cash litigation expense - - 10,315
Stock-based compensation expense 38,911 18,822 7,888
Change in fair value of derivative liability 6,000 - -
Depreciation and amortization expense 2,217 1,254 774
Amortization of premium on investments 373 (3,559) (1,126)
Lease expense 8,095 2,747 -
Other (460) (191) 12
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Litigation settlement payable - (10,500) 10,500
Deferred revenue 79,784 211,803 173,916
Prepaid expenses and other assets (12,511) (3,856) 532
Accounts payable 2,208 2,067 (1,217)
Contract receivables 165,641 (100,354) (100,000)
Accrued expenses and other liabilities 6,738 9,487 3,974
Lease liability (10,420) (8,966) -
Deferred charges and other assets 1,283 1,013 1,583
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities 175,112 (692) 18,298
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Maturities of held-to-maturity investments 655,000 418,000 81,000
Purchases of held-to-maturity investments (902,128) (362,120) (283,372)
Purchases of property and equipment (11,747) (6,349) (359)
Other 15 - -
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities (258,860) 49,531 (202,731)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net of underwriters’ commissions 39,192 - 108,099
Payments of common stock offering costs (104) (50) (703)
Proceeds from issuance of common stock to collaboration partners - 45,828 60,412
Proceeds from exercises of common stock warrants, stock options, and issuances under Employee Stock Purchase Plan 20,380 7,110 2,110
Other (45) - (35)
Net cash provided by financing activities 59,423 52,888 169,883
NET (DECREASE) INCREASE IN CASH, CASH EQUIVALENTS, AND RESTRICTED CASH EQUIVALENTS (24,325) 101,727 (14,550)
CASH, CASH EQUIVALENTS, AND RESTRICTED CASH EQUIVALENTS - Beginning of year 156,710 54,983 69,533
CASH, CASH EQUIVALENTS AND RESTRICTED CASH EQUIVALENTS - End of year $ 132,385 $ 156,710 $ 54,983
DICERNA PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (CONTINUED)
(in thousands)
YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31,
2020 2019 2018
SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
NONCASH OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Right-of-use assets acquired through operating leases $ 32,368 $ 25,725 $ -
NONCASH INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Property and equipment purchases included in accounts payable and accrued expenses $ 1,612 $ 727 $ 1,648
NONCASH FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Right-of-use assets acquired through finance leases $ 48 $ 193 $ -
Common stock offering costs included in accounts payable or accrued expenses $ - $ - $ 50
The following table provides a reconciliation of cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash equivalents reported within the consolidated balance sheets that sum to the total of the amounts shown in the consolidated statements of cash flows:
DECEMBER 31,
2020 2019 2018
Cash and cash equivalents $ 126,023 $ 152,816 $ 54,239
Restricted cash equivalents, current 744 - -
Restricted cash equivalents, noncurrent 5,618 3,894 744
Total cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash equivalents shown in the consolidated statements of cash flows $ 132,385 $ 156,710 $ 54,983
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
DICERNA PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(tabular amounts in thousands, except share and per share data and where otherwise noted)
1. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS
Business
Dicerna Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“the Company” or “Dicerna”), is a biopharmaceutical company focused on discovering, developing, and commercializing medicines that are designed to leverage ribonucleic acid interference (“RNAi”) to silence selectively genes that cause or contribute to disease. Using the Company’s proprietary GalXC™ and GalXC-Plus™ RNAi technologies, Dicerna is committed to developing RNAi-based therapies with the potential to treat both rare and more prevalent diseases. By silencing disease-causing genes, Dicerna’s GalXC platform has the potential to address conditions that are difficult to treat with other modalities. Initially focused on disease-causing genes in the liver, Dicerna has continued to innovate and is exploring new applications of its RNAi technology with GalXC-Plus, which expands on the functionality and application of our flagship liver-based GalXC technology, yet has the potential to treat diseases across multiple therapeutic areas. In addition to the Company’s own pipeline of core discovery and clinical candidates, Dicerna has established collaborative relationships with some of the world’s leading pharmaceutical companies, including Novo Nordisk A/S (“Novo”), Roche, Eli Lilly and Company (“Lilly”), Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (together with its affiliates, “Alexion”), Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH (“BI”), and Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“Alnylam”). Between Dicerna and its collaborative partners, the Company currently has more than 20 active discovery, preclinical, or clinical programs focused on rare, cardiometabolic, viral, chronic liver, and complement-mediated diseases, as well as neurodegenerative diseases and pain.
COVID-19
On March 11, 2020, the World Health Organization declared the novel coronavirus (“COVID-19”) a pandemic. The global spread of COVID-19 has created significant volatility, uncertainty, and economic disruption worldwide. Governments in affected regions have implemented, and may continue to implement, safety precautions which include quarantines, travel restrictions, business closures, and other public health safety measures.
To date, Dicerna has been impacted by mandatory work from home edicts directed by local governments in the jurisdictions in which the Company operates. However, essential work exemptions continue to permit critical research and development and laboratory activities for limited personnel. Those exemptions enable some continued discovery research and activities supporting the Company’s collaborative agreements and its own programs. Externally, the COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in slower enrollment in the Company’s clinical trials, and Dicerna has undertaken efforts to mitigate potential impacts to our business including those related to conducting clinical trials and managing our supply chain. The Company continues to be alert to the potential for disruptions that could arise from COVID-19 and monitors the Food and Drug Administration’s (“FDA”) and other health authorities’ guidance for the conduct of clinical trials during this time.
Current supply of Dicerna’s investigational medicines is sufficient to support ongoing and planned clinical trials. Based on current evaluations, Dicerna’s supply chains continue to appear intact to meet at least the next 12 months of clinical, nonclinical, and chemistry, manufacturing, and control (“CMC”) supply demands across all programs. The Company has undertaken efforts to mitigate potential future impacts to the supply chain by increasing its stock of critical starting materials required to meet its needs and its collaborative partners’ needs through 2021 and by identifying and engaging alternative suppliers. The Company continues to be alert to the potential for disruptions that could arise from COVID-19, including on account of United States (“U.S.”) government utilization of its Defense Production Act authorities, and remains in close contact with suppliers.
It is difficult to predict what the lasting impact of the pandemic will be, and what the impact might be if the Company or any of the third parties with whom it engages were to experience additional shutdowns or other prolonged business disruptions. The Company’s ability to conduct its business in the manner and on the timelines presently planned could have a material adverse impact on the Company’s business, results of operations, and financial condition. In addition, depending on the duration and impact of the recurrence or resurgence of COVID-19 cases or continued evolution of further strains of COVID-19, and depending on where the infection rates are highest, and including the ability of regulators to continue ensuring the timely review and approval of applications, the Company’s business, results of operations, and financial condition may be negatively impacted. The Company will continue to monitor developments as it deals with the disruptions and uncertainties relating to the COVID-19 pandemic.
2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Basis of presentation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) and include the accounts of Dicerna Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiaries. The Company believes that the financial statements as presented reflect all normal recurring adjustments necessary for a fair statement of the information for the periods presented. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
Significant judgments and estimates
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the Company’s consolidated financial statements, as well as the revenues and expenses incurred during the reporting periods. On an ongoing basis, the Company evaluates judgments and estimates, including those related to revenue recognition, stock-based compensation, the derivative liability, and accrued expenses. The Company bases its estimates on historical experience and on various other factors that the Company believes are reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not apparent from other sources. Changes in estimates are reflected in reported results for the period in which they become known. Actual results could differ materially from those estimates.
Cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents includes all highly liquid investments, including money market funds, maturing within 90 days from the date of purchase.
Restricted cash equivalents
Restricted cash equivalents are money market funds held in collateral accounts that are restricted to secure letters of credit for corporate lease activity. The letters of credit are required to be maintained throughout the terms of the leases.
Held-to-maturity investments
The Company invests its excess cash balances in short-term and long-term fixed-income investments. The Company determines the appropriate classification of investments at the time of purchase and re-evaluates such designation as of each balance sheet date. Debt securities carried at amortized cost are classified as held-to-maturity when the Company has the positive intent and ability to hold the securities to maturity.
The contractual terms of these investments do not permit the issuer to settle the securities at a price less than the amortized cost bases of the investments. The Company does not intend to sell its investments and the Company has the intent and ability to hold its investments until they mature.
The Company’s investment policy mandates that, at the time of purchase, the maturity of each investment within its portfolio shall not exceed two years. In addition, the weighted average maturity of the investment portfolio must not exceed one year.
The Company’s policy is not to measure an allowance for credit losses for interest receivable and to write off any uncollectible interest receivable as a reversal of interest income in the period in which it determines the interest will not be collected. The Company did not write off any accrued interest receivables during the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019.
Concentrations of credit risk and significant customers
Financial instruments that subject the Company to significant concentrations of credit risk consist of cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash equivalents, held-to-maturity investments, contract receivables, and the withholding tax receivable (see Note 8 - Collaborative Research and License Agreements). All of the Company’s cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash equivalents, and held-to-maturity investments are invested in money market funds or U.S. treasury securities that management believes to be of high credit quality.
The Company’s revenues for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018 are primarily related to the Company’s collaboration agreements which are concentrated among a few collaboration partners. All revenues recognized by the Company to date were earned in the United States. Refer to Note 8 - Collaborative Research And License Agreements for composition of significant collaboration relationships.
The Company does not currently own or operate any manufacturing facilities for the production of preclinical, clinical, or commercial quantities of any of its product candidates. For each product candidate, the Company currently contracts with manufacturers and expects to continue to do so to meet the preclinical and clinical requirements of its product candidates.
Fair Value Measurements
Fair value is an exit price, representing the amount that would be received from the sale of an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. As such, fair value is a market-based measurement that should be determined based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability. Valuation techniques used to measure fair value are performed in a manner to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. As a basis for considering such assumption, the accounting literature establishes a three-tier value hierarchy which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value as follows:
•Level 1 - observable inputs, such as quoted prices in active markets;
•Level 2 - inputs other than the quoted prices in active markets that are observable either directly or indirectly; and
•Level 3 - unobservable inputs for which there is little or no market data, which requires the Company to develop its own assumptions.
Property and equipment
Property and equipment are stated at cost. Major betterments are capitalized, whereas expenditures for maintenance and repairs which do not improve or extend the life of the respective assets are charged to operations as incurred. Depreciation is calculated and applied using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives, as shown below:
ASSET CATEGORY
ESTIMATED
USEFUL LIVES
Laboratory equipment
5 years
Office and computer equipment
3 - 5 years
Furniture and fixtures
5 years
Leasehold improvements
5 years or the remaining
term of lease, if shorter
Construction-in-process is stated at cost, which includes the cost of construction and other direct costs attributable to the construction. No provision for depreciation and amortization expense is recorded related to construction-in-process until the relevant assets are completed and put into use. At December 31, 2020, the balance of construction-in-process includes construction costs for lessee-owned improvements for leased premises and costs associated with laboratory equipment under installation.
Cloud computing arrangements
The Company adopted Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2018-15, Customer’s Accounting for Implementation Costs Incurred in a Cloud Computing Arrangement That is a Service Contract on January 1, 2020. ASU 2018-15 aligns the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs in a cloud computing arrangement service contract with the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred for internal-use software licenses. Eligible costs associated with cloud computing arrangements, such as software business applications used in the normal course of business, are capitalized in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 350 - Intangibles - Goodwill and Other.
The Company’s cloud computing arrangements relate to various enterprise resource planning systems. These assets are included in property and equipment, net in the consolidated balance sheets and are amortized on a straight-line basis over their assessed useful lives or the term of the underlying cloud computing hosting contract, whichever is shorter. As of December 31, 2020, the estimated useful lives of these assets were three years. As of December 31, 2020, cloud computing arrangement assets consisted of capitalized implementation costs of $2.7 million. No amortization expense associated with the Company’s cloud computing arrangements has been recognized during the year ended December 31, 2020. The Company evaluates the useful lives of these assets on an annual basis and tests for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable.
Impairment of long-lived assets
Long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the asset may not be recoverable. When such events occur, the Company compares the carrying amounts of the assets to their undiscounted expected future cash flows. If this comparison indicates that there is an impairment, the amount of the impairment is calculated as the difference between the carrying value and fair value of the related asset. During the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018, no impairments were recorded.
Leases
On January 1, 2019, the Company adopted the new lease standard, Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 842, Leases, which is intended to increase transparency and comparability among organizations by requiring lessees to recognize most leases on their balance sheets and making targeted changes to lessor accounting. The most significant change arising from the new standard is the recognition of right-of-use (“ROU”) assets and lease liabilities for leases classified as operating leases. Under the standard, disclosures are required to enable financial statement users to assess the amount, timing, and uncertainty of cash flows arising from the leases. Initial implementation of the standard did not have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements, but required additional disclosures.
The Company elected the package of three practical expedients that permitted an entity not to (a) reassess whether expired or existing contracts contain leases, (b) reassess lease classification for existing or expired leases, and (c) consider whether previously capitalized initial direct costs would be appropriate under the new standard. In adopting ASC 842, the Company elected not to bifurcate payments between lease and nonlease components associated with leases for office and laboratory real estate.
The Company determines if an arrangement is a lease at inception. Leases with a term greater than one year are presented on the balance sheet as ROU assets, lease liabilities and, if applicable, long-term lease liabilities. The Company has elected not to recognize leases with terms of one year or less on its balance sheet. At the commencement date, operating lease liabilities and their corresponding ROU assets are recorded based on the present value of future lease payments over the expected lease term. Certain adjustments to the ROU asset may be required for items such as initial direct costs paid or incentives received. Operating lease cost is recognized over the expected term on a straight-line basis.
The Company determines the expected term for its operating leases considering the noncancelable period of the lease, plus any additional periods covered by either (a) a Company option to extend (or not to terminate) the lease that the Company is reasonably certain to exercise, or (b) an option to extend (or not to terminate) the lease controlled by the lessor.
Derivative liability
The derivative liability is recorded at fair value, which is estimated using a Monte Carlo simulation for estimated future contingent royalty and milestone payments. The liability is measured quarterly with any change in fair value recorded in other income (expense) in the consolidated statements of operations.
Segment and geographic information
Operating segments are defined as components (business activity from which it earns revenue and incurs expenses) of an enterprise about which discrete financial information is available and regularly reviewed by the chief operating decision maker in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance. The Company, through its Chief Executive Officer in his role as chief operating decision maker, views Company operations and manages the business as one operating segment. All long-lived assets of the Company are located in the United States.
Research and development costs
Research and development costs consist of expenses incurred in performing research and development activities, including compensation and benefits for full-time research and development employees, an allocation of facility expenses and overhead expenses, and other external expenses. Research and development costs are expensed as incurred and were $205.4 million, $109.3 million and $45.7 million for the years ending December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018, respectively. Research and development costs that are paid in advance of performance are deferred as a prepaid expense and amortized over the service period as the services are provided.
Grants and credits
The Company sometimes receives assistance from third-party entities such as governmental or non-profit agencies. When assistance is received from a governmental entity, the Company first determines whether the payment represents revenue by considering factors such as whether a commercial purpose exists for the payments and whether the required activity to qualify for the assistance relates to the Company’s ongoing activities. If the Company concludes that the assistance is revenue, the Company applies ASC 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. If the assistance is in the form of an income tax credit, the Company applies the guidance in ASC 740, Income Taxes. When the Company determines that the assistance is not revenue and does not fall within the scope of ASC 740, it applies International Accounting Standard 20, Accounting for Government Grants and Disclosure of Government Assistance. Typically, government grants may be considered related to assets or related to income. The Company generally records grants from governmental and non-profit agencies related to income as a reduction in research and development expense. Grants are recognized when there is reasonable assurance that the Company will comply with the conditions attached to the grant arrangement and the grant will be received. Grant payments received related to research and development costs incurred prior to the approval of the qualifying program are recognized immediately upon approval of the program by the grantor.
Revenue recognition
The Company generates revenue from research collaboration and license agreements with customers. Goods and services in the agreements may include the grant of licenses for the use of the Company’s technology, the provision of services associated with the research and development of product candidates, manufacturing services, and participation on joint steering committees. Such agreements may provide for consideration to the Company in the form of upfront payments; funding or reimbursement of research and development services; reimbursement of certain costs; option exercise payments; payments due upon the achievement of research, development, regulatory, and commercial-based milestones; and royalty payments on licensed products.
On January 1, 2018, the Company adopted ASC 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, which amended revenue recognition principles and provides a single, comprehensive set of criteria for revenue recognition. The new revenue standard applies to all contracts with customers except for contracts that are within the scope of other standards. The new guidance provides a five-step framework through which revenue is recognized when control of promised goods or services is transferred to a customer at an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. To determine revenue recognition for arrangements that the Company concludes are within the scope of the new revenue recognition standard, management performs the following five steps: (i) identifies the contract(s) with a customer; (ii) identifies the performance obligations in the contract; (iii) determines the transaction price, including whether there are any constraints on variable consideration; (iv) allocates the transaction price to the performance obligations; and (v) recognizes revenue when (or as) the Company satisfies a performance obligation. At contract inception, once a contract is determined to be within the scope of the new revenue standard, Dicerna assesses whether individual goods or services promised within each contract are distinct and, therefore, represent a separate performance obligation. Goods and services that are determined not to be distinct are combined with other promised goods or services until a distinct bundle is identified. Dicerna allocates the transaction price (the amount of consideration to which the Company expects to be entitled in exchange for the promised goods or services) to each performance obligation and recognizes the associated revenue when (or as) each performance obligation is satisfied. The Company’s estimate of the transaction price for each contract includes all variable consideration to which Dicerna expects to be entitled at each measuring period.
When two or more contracts are entered into with the same customer at or near the same time, the Company evaluates the contracts to determine whether the contracts should be accounted for as a single arrangement. Contracts are combined and accounted for as a single arrangement if one or more of the following criteria are met: (i) the contracts are negotiated as a package with a single commercial objective; (ii) the amount of consideration to be paid in one contract depends on the price or performance of the other contract; or (iii) the goods or services promised in the contracts (or some goods or services promised in each of the contracts) are a single performance obligation.
The evaluation of whether promised goods or services represent distinct performance obligations is subjective and requires the Company to make judgments about the promised goods and services and whether such goods and services are separable from the other aspects of the contract(s).
The transaction price is allocated among the performance obligations on a relative standalone selling price basis, and the applicable revenue recognition criteria are applied to each of the separate performance obligations. The Company may estimate the standalone selling price using a residual method when the selling price is highly variable because a representative standalone selling price is not discernible from past transactions or other observable evidence, or when the selling price is uncertain.
Determining the standalone selling price for performance obligations requires significant judgment. When an observable price of a promised good or service is not readily available, the Company considers relevant assumptions to estimate the standalone selling price, including, as applicable, market conditions, development timelines, probabilities of technical and regulatory success, reimbursement rates for personnel costs, forecasted revenues, potential limitations to the selling price of the product, and discount rates.
The Company applies judgment in determining whether a combined performance obligation is satisfied at a point in time or over time, and, if over time, concluding upon the appropriate method of measuring progress to be applied for purposes of recognizing revenue. The Company evaluates the measure of progress each reporting period and, as estimates related to the measure of progress change, related revenue recognition is adjusted accordingly. Changes in the Company’s estimated measure of progress are accounted for on a cumulative catch-up basis as a change in accounting estimate and are recorded through earnings in the period of adjustment.
The Company receives payments from its licensees as established in each contract. Upfront payments and fees are recorded as deferred revenue upon receipt or when due and most often require deferral of revenue recognition to a future period until the Company performs its obligations under the underlying arrangements. Where applicable, amounts are recorded as contracts receivable when the Company’s right to consideration is unconditional.
Licenses of intellectual property
If a license granted to a customer to use the Company’s intellectual property is determined to be distinct from the other performance obligations identified in the arrangement, the Company recognizes revenue from consideration allocated to the license when the license is transferred to the licensee and the licensee is able to use and benefit from the license. For licenses that are bundled with other promises, the Company applies judgment to assess the nature of the combined performance obligation to determine whether the combined performance obligation is satisfied over time or at a point in time and, if over time, to conclude upon the appropriate method of measuring progress for purposes of recognizing revenue related to consideration allocated to the performance obligation.
Research and development services
Arrangements that include a promise for the Company to provide research or development services are assessed to determine whether the services are capable of being distinct, are not highly interdependent or do not significantly modify one another, and if so, the services are accounted for as a separate performance obligation as the services are provided to the customer. Otherwise, when research or development services are determined not to be capable of being distinct, such services are added to the performance obligation that includes the underlying license. For research and development services that are bundled with other promises, the Company applies judgment to assess the nature of the combined performance obligation to determine whether the combined performance obligation is satisfied over time or at a point in time and, if over time, to conclude upon the appropriate method of measuring progress for purposes of recognizing revenue related to consideration allocated to the performance obligation. The Company evaluates the measure of progress each reporting period and, if necessary, adjusts the measure of performance and related revenue recognition.
Options
Customer options, such as options granted to allow a licensee to choose to research and develop additional product candidates or reserve product candidates against target genes to be identified in the future, or options that allow a customer to designate a target as a lead product, are evaluated at contract inception in order to determine whether those options provide a material right (i.e., an optional good or service offered for free or at a discount) to the customer. If the customer option represents a material right, the material right is treated as a separate performance obligation at the outset of the arrangement. The Company allocates the transaction price to material rights based on the standalone selling price, and revenue is recognized when or as the future goods or services are transferred or when the option expires. Customer options that are not material rights do not give rise to separate performance obligations, and as such, the additional consideration that would result from a customer exercising an option in the future is not included in the transaction price for the current contract. Instead, the option is deemed a marketing offer, and additional option fee payments are recognized or begin being recognized as revenue when the licensee exercises the option. The exercise of an option that does not represent a material right is treated as a separate contract for accounting purposes.
Milestone payments
At the inception of each contract with a customer that includes development or regulatory milestone payments, the Company evaluates whether the milestones are considered probable of being reached and estimates the amount to be included in the transaction price using the most likely amount method. If the Company concludes it is probable that a significant revenue reversal would not occur, the associated milestone payment is included in the transaction price. Milestone payments that are not within the control of the Company or the licensee, such as regulatory approvals, are generally not considered probable of being achieved until those approvals are received. The transaction price is then allocated to each performance obligation on a relative stand-alone selling price basis, for which the Company recognizes revenue as or when the performance obligations under the contract are satisfied.
At the end of each subsequent reporting period, the Company re-evaluates the probability of achievement of all milestones and any related constraints, and, if necessary, adjusts the estimate of the overall transaction price. Any such adjustments are recorded on a cumulative catch-up basis and are recorded as revenue and through earnings in the period of adjustment.
Royalties
For arrangements that include sales-based royalties, including milestone payments based on the level of sales, and when the license is deemed to be the predominant item to which the royalties relate, the Company recognizes revenue at the later of (i) when the related sales occur, or (ii) when the performance obligation to which some or all of the royalty has been allocated has been satisfied (or partially satisfied).
Contract costs
The Company recognizes as an asset the incremental costs of obtaining a contract with a customer if the costs are expected to be recovered. The Company has elected a practical expedient wherein it recognizes the incremental costs of obtaining a contract as an expense when incurred if the amortization period of the asset that it otherwise would have recognized is one year or less. To date, the Company has not incurred any incremental costs of obtaining a contract with a customer.
Contract modifications
Contract modifications, defined as changes in the scope or price (or both) of a contract that are approved by the parties to the contract, such as a contract amendment, exist when the parties to a contract approve a modification that either creates new or changes existing enforceable rights and obligations of the parties to the contract. Depending on facts and circumstances, the Company accounts for a contract modification as one of the following: (i) a separate contract; (ii) a termination of the existing contract and a creation of a new contract; or (iii) a combination of the preceding treatments. A contract modification is accounted for as a separate contract if the scope of the contract increases because of the addition of promised goods or services that are distinct and the price of the contract increases by an amount of consideration that reflects the Company’s standalone selling prices of the additional promised goods or services. When a contract modification is not considered a separate contract and the remaining goods or services are distinct from the goods or services transferred on or before the date of the contract modification, the Company accounts for the contract modification as a termination of the existing contract and a creation of a new contract. When a contract modification is not considered a separate contract and the remaining goods or services are not distinct, the Company accounts for the contract modification as an add-on to the existing contract and as an adjustment to revenue on a cumulative catch-up basis.
The Company receives payments from its licensees as established in each contract. Upfront payments and fees are recorded as deferred revenue upon receipt or when due and may require deferral of revenue recognition to a future period until the Company performs its obligations under these arrangements. Where applicable, amounts are recorded as contracts receivable when the Company’s right to consideration is unconditional. The Company does not assess whether a contract with a customer has a significant financing component if the expectation at contract inception is such that the period between payment by the licensees and the transfer of the promised goods or services to the licensees will be one year or less.
Stock-based compensation
The Company’s stock-based compensation cost is measured at the grant date of the stock-based award based on the fair value of the award and is recognized as expense over the requisite service period, which generally represents the vesting period, and includes an estimate of the awards that will be forfeited. The Company uses the Black-Scholes valuation model for estimating the fair value of stock options. The fair value of stock option awards is affected by the valuation assumptions, including the expected volatility based on comparable market participants, expected term of the stock option, risk-free interest rate, and expected dividends.
Income taxes
The Company records deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between the Company’s financial statement carrying amounts and the tax basis of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates expected to be in effect in the years in which the differences are expected to reverse. A valuation allowance is provided to reduce the net deferred tax assets to the amount that will more likely than not (more than 50 percent) be realized.
The Company also assesses the probability that the positions taken or expected to be taken in its income tax returns will be sustained by taxing authorities. A “more likely than not” recognition threshold must be met before a tax benefit can be recognized. Tax positions that are more likely than not to be sustained are reflected in the Company’s consolidated financial statements. Tax positions are measured as the largest amount of tax benefit that is greater than 50 percent likely of being realized upon settlement with a taxing authority that has full knowledge of all relevant information. The difference between the benefit recognized for a position and the tax benefit claimed on a tax return is referred to as an unrecognized tax benefit. Potential interest and penalties associated with such uncertain tax positions are recorded as a component of income tax expense.
Net loss per common share
The Company computes basic net loss per common share by dividing net loss by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. In periods of net income, the Company’s accounting policy includes allocating a proportional share of net income to participating securities, as determined by dividing total weighted average participating securities by the sum of the total weighted average common shares and participating securities (the “two-class method”). Participating securities have the effect of diluting both basic and diluted earnings per share during periods of income. During periods when the Company incurs a net loss, the Company does not allocate a loss to participating securities because they have no contractual obligation to share in the losses of the Company. The Company computes diluted net loss per common share after giving consideration to the dilutive effect of stock options, warrants, and nonvested restricted stock units that are outstanding during the period, except where such non-participating securities would be anti-dilutive.
The outstanding securities presented below were excluded from the calculation of net loss per share because such securities would have been anti-dilutive due to the Company’s net loss per share during the periods ending on the dates presented.
DECEMBER 31,
2020 2019 2018
Options to purchase common stock
14,323,689 12,467,150 7,787,690
Nonvested restricted common stock
1,055,405 - -
Warrants to purchase common stock - 2,198 2,198
Total
15,379,094 12,469,348 7,789,888
Recent accounting pronouncements
In December 2019, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ASU 2019-12, Simplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes, amending accounting guidance that simplifies the accounting for income taxes as part of its initiative to reduce complexity in the accounting standards. The amendments eliminate certain exceptions related to the approach for intraperiod tax allocation, the methodology for calculating income taxes in an interim period, and the recognition of deferred tax liabilities for outside basis differences. The amendments also clarify and simplify other aspects of the accounting for income taxes. For public business entities, ASU 2019-12 is required to be adopted effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2020. The Company is currently evaluating the effect this standard will have on its financial statements and related disclosures.
In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments (“ASU 2016-13”). The FASB subsequently issued amendments to ASU 2016-13 which had the same effective date as ASU 2016-13 of January 1, 2020. These standards require that credit losses be reported using an expected losses model rather than the incurred losses model that was previously used and establish additional disclosures related to credit risks associated with financial assets. The adoption of this standard did not have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements, but required additional disclosures.
3. HELD-TO-MATURITY INVESTMENTS
A summary of the Company’s held-to-maturity investments is presented below:
DECEMBER 31, 2020
DESCRIPTION
AMORTIZED COST
GROSS UNREALIZED
HOLDING GAINS
GROSS
UNREALIZED
HOLDING LOSSES
FAIR VALUE
U.S. Treasury securities maturing in one year or less
$ 442,820 $ 163 $ (12) $ 442,971
DECEMBER 31, 2019
DESCRIPTION
AMORTIZED COST
GROSS UNREALIZED
HOLDING GAINS
GROSS
UNREALIZED
HOLDING LOSSES
FAIR VALUE
U.S. Treasury securities maturing in one year or less
$ 196,065 $ 160 $ (6) $ 196,219
The contractual terms of these investments do not permit the issuer to settle the securities at a price less than the amortized cost bases of the investments.
4. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
A summary of the Company’s assets and liabilities that are measured or disclosed at fair value on a recurring basis is presented below:
DECEMBER 31, 2020
DESCRIPTION
TOTAL FAIR VALUE LEVEL 1 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3
Financial assets
Cash equivalents
Money market funds $ 126,006 $ 126,006 $ - $ -
Held-to-maturity investments
U.S. Treasury securities 442,971 - 442,971 -
Restricted cash equivalents
Money market funds 6,362 6,362 - -
Total financial assets $ 575,339 $ 132,368 $ 442,971 $ -
Financial liabilities
Derivative liability 6,000 - - 6,000
Total financial liabilities $ 6,000 $ - $ - $ 6,000
DECEMBER 31, 2019
DESCRIPTION
TOTAL FAIR VALUE LEVEL 1 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3
Financial assets
Cash equivalents
Money market funds $ 152,903 $ 152,903 $ - $ -
Held-to-maturity investments
U.S. Treasury securities 196,219 - 196,219 -
Restricted cash equivalents
Money market funds 3,894 3,894 - -
Total financial assets $ 353,016 $ 156,797 $ 196,219 $ -
The Company’s cash equivalents and restricted cash equivalents, which are held in money market funds, are classified within Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy because they are valued using quoted prices in active markets as of December 31, 2020 and 2019. Restricted cash equivalents represent money market investments which secure letters of credit established in connection with the Company’s facility leases.
The Company’s held-to-maturity investments bore interest at the prevailing market rates for instruments with similar characteristics and therefore the amortized cost approximated fair value. These financial instruments were classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy because the inputs to the fair value measurements were valued using observable inputs as of December 31, 2020 and 2019.
The Company’s derivative liability associated with certain contingent payments under our collaboration agreement with Alnylam is classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy because the fair value utilizes unobservable inputs for which there is no market data and therefore requires the Company to develop its own assumptions. Such assumptions include the probability of success of development, the probability that Alnylam exercises its commercialization option, the timing of regulatory approval and the first commercial sale, and the volume of sales.
As of December 31, 2020 and 2019, the Company’s contract receivables, accounts payable, and accrued expenses approximated their estimated fair values because of the short-term nature of these financial instruments.
5. PREPAID EXPENSES AND OTHER CURRENT ASSETS
Prepaid expenses and other current assets consist of the following:
DECEMBER 31,
2020 2019
Prepaid clinical, contract research, and manufacturing costs $ 9,651 $ 4,288
Interest receivable 1,345 918
Prepaid insurance 817 583
Other prepaid expenses and other current assets 2,590 1,145
Prepaid expenses and other current assets $ 14,403 $ 6,934
6. PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, NET
Property and equipment, net, consists of the following:
DECEMBER 31,
2020 2019
Laboratory equipment
$ 8,637 $ 9,147
Office and computer equipment
2,049 2,425
Furniture and fixtures
1,251 1,569
Leasehold improvements
1,003 257
Construction-in-process
10,038 238
Property and equipment, at cost 22,978 13,636
Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization expense
(5,432) (6,560)
Property and equipment, net $ 17,546 $ 7,076
Depreciation and amortization expense was $2.2 million, $1.3 million, and $0.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018.
7. ACCRUED EXPENSES AND OTHER CURRENT LIABILITIES
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities consist of the following:
DECEMBER 31,
2020 2019
Accrued clinical, contract research, and manufacturing costs $ 9,297 $ 10,347
Accrued compensation and other employee-related benefits 14,031 7,298
Accrued professional fees 2,117 1,519
Other accrued expenses and current liabilities 2,616 878
Total 28,061 $ 20,042
8. COLLABORATIVE RESEARCH AND LICENSE AGREEMENTS
Alnylam collaboration and patent cross-license agreements
Background
On April 3, 2020, the Company and Alnylam (collectively, the “parties”) entered into a Collaboration and License Agreement (the “A1AT Agreement”) and a Patent Cross License Agreement (the “PH Agreement”). Pursuant to the A1AT Agreement, Dicerna will lead efforts on investigational RNAi therapeutics for the treatment of alpha-1 antitrypsin (“AAT”) deficiency (“AATD”)-associated liver disease (“AATLD”). Pursuant to the PH Agreement, the parties completed a cross-license of their respective intellectual property for Alnylam’s lumasiran and Dicerna’s nedosiran investigational programs for the treatment of primary hyperoxaluria (“PH”). No upfront cash consideration was exchanged in either transaction.
Pursuant to the A1AT Agreement, Alnylam’s AAT product (ALN-AAT02, or the “Alnylam Product”) and Dicerna’s AAT product (belcesiran, or the “Dicerna Product”) would be explored for the treatment of AATLD. Under the A1AT Agreement, the Company obtained an exclusive worldwide license to Alnylam’s intellectual property to exploit the Alnylam Product. Dicerna assumed responsibility for the development of both the Alnylam Product and the Dicerna Product at its cost. Dicerna selected belcesiran to advance in development for the treatment of patients with AATLD. At the completion of Phase 3, Alnylam has the no-cost opportunity to opt-in to commercialize belcesiran in countries outside the U.S. where it already has a commercialization infrastructure in place (the “Commercialization Option”). If Alnylam exercises its Commercialization Option, the parties will share future development costs. Further, each party will pay tiered royalties to the other party based on a percentage of net product sales generated in its territory ranging from low single-digits to high teens. In the event Alnylam waives its Commercialization Option, the Company will retain worldwide rights to commercialize belcesiran in exchange for payments upon the satisfaction of certain milestones, up to an aggregate of $45.0 million, and royalties will be payable to Alnylam based on net product sales in the low to mid-single-digits. As a result of these uncertain contingent payments the Company may owe to Alnylam, the Company recorded a derivative liability on the consolidated balance sheet for the year ended December 31, 2020. The A1AT Agreement is subject to customary termination provisions, and the Company may terminate the A1AT Agreement at any time without cause following the notice period described in the A1AT Agreement.
Pursuant to the PH Agreement, the parties granted to each other a perpetual non-exclusive cross-license to their respective intellectual property related to their respective PH treatment investigational programs to ensure that each party has the freedom to develop and commercialize its respective product with Alnylam’s lumasiran targeting glycolate oxidase (“GO”) for the treatment of PH type 1 and Dicerna’s nedosiran targeting lactate dehydrogenase A (“LDHA”) for the treatment of PH types 1, 2, and 3. Each party will have sole discretion concerning the research and development of its products in the field. In exchange for the license, Alnylam is required to pay mid- to high-single-digit royalties to Dicerna based on global net sales of lumasiran and Dicerna is required to pay low-single-digit royalties to Alnylam on global net sales of nedosiran. The PH Agreement cannot be terminated by either party for the other party’s breach. However, either party may terminate the PH Agreement or may reduce the royalty payable to the other party upon a patent-related challenge by the other party unless the challenge is withdrawn and no longer pending within the time periods specified in the PH Agreement. Further, the PH Agreement will terminate upon the expiration of the last-to-expire patent rights licensed thereunder.
Accounting Analysis
The Company determined that the A1AT Agreement and the PH Agreement represent separate agreements for accounting purposes, as the transactions have different commercial objectives, the consideration under each contract is not dependent upon the price or performance of the other contract, and the goods or services under each contract are separate performance obligations.
A1AT Agreement
The Company concluded that the A1AT Agreement was within the scope of ASC 606, Contracts with Customers, as the provision of research and development services is considered an output of the entity’s ordinary activities in exchange for consideration.
The Company identified a single performance obligation under the A1AT Agreement, which consists of the provision of certain nonclinical and clinical services through the completion of the Phase 1 clinical trial for any product.
The Company determined that the transaction price at inception of the A1AT Agreement consists of non-cash consideration in the form of the license received from Alnylam. The Company determined that the fair value of the non-cash consideration (the license received from Alnylam) is insignificant given the early-stage development status of the Alnylam Product and the related risks associated with developing a commercial product. The sales-based royalties that Dicerna may be entitled to receive in the event that Alnylam exercises its Commercialization Option have been excluded from the transaction price and will be recognized only if Alnylam exercises its Commercialization Option and the related sales occur.
As described above, Dicerna may be required to pay contingent milestones and royalties to compensate Alnylam for the license provided under the agreement. Given the uncertainty associated with these contingent payments, the Company recognized $6.0 million of other expense in the three months ended December 31, 2020.
The Company has recorded development costs incurred under the A1AT Agreement as research and development expenses in the Company’s consolidated statement of operations.
PH Agreement
The Company concluded that the PH Agreement is within the scope of ASC 610, Other Income - Gains and Losses from the Derecognition of Nonfinancial Assets, as the exchange of non-exclusive licenses is considered an exchange of non-financial assets outside the ordinary scope of business. Pursuant to ASC 610-20, the Company applied the guidance in ASC 606 to determine if a contract exists, identify the distinct non-financial assets, and determine when control transfers and, therefore, when to derecognize the asset. Additionally, the Company applied the measurement principles of ASC 606 to determine the amount of consideration, if any, to include in the calculation of the gain or loss for the non-financial asset.
The Company determined that it transferred control of a non-financial asset (the non-exclusive license granted to Alnylam) at contract inception. Applying the non-cash consideration guidance in ASC 606, the Company further determined that the fair value of the non-financial asset received (the non-exclusive license from Alnylam) was insignificant. Therefore, the Company concluded that no gain or loss would be recorded related to the PH Agreement at contract inception.
The Company has recorded costs related to its PH program as research and development expenses in the Company’s consolidated statement of operations.
Novo collaboration and share purchase agreements
Background
On November 15, 2019, Dicerna and Novo entered into a Collaboration and License Agreement (the “Novo Collaboration Agreement”). Under the terms of the Novo Collaboration Agreement, the Company and Novo will seek to use GalXC to explore more than 30 gene targets associated with liver disease with the goal of delivering multiple clinical candidates for disorders including chronic liver disease, non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (“NASH”), type 2 diabetes, obesity, and rare diseases. The Company will conduct and fund discovery and preclinical development to clinical candidate selection for each liver cell target. Novo will be responsible for all further development and the commercialization of each candidate selected for development, with the Company manufacturing clinical candidates selected for Phase 1-related clinical development, subject to reimbursement for its manufacturing costs. In addition, the Company will assist Novo with the Investigational New Drug (“IND”) filing for the first development candidate. The Company also retains the ability to opt in to co-development of a total of two programs during clinical development in Phases 1-3, subject to limitations in the event of a change in control. If the Company exercises a co-development option, it also has an option to co-promote the product in the United States, subject to limitations in the event of a change in control of the Company. Additionally, the Company may lead the development and commercialization of two programs targeting orphan liver diseases, with Novo retaining the ability to opt in to both programs in Phases 1-3. The Company and Novo will share in profits and losses for the Company’s orphan liver and Novo products should both parties elect to co-develop.
The Company is working exclusively with Novo during the research collaboration period on the discovery, research, development, and commercialization of hepatocyte targets subject to certain exclusions including those targets subject to the Company’s existing partnerships, and Novo is, during a specified discovery period, working exclusively with the Company in any new research and development of compounds and products directed to collaboration targets using small interfering RNA (“siRNA”) conjugated to the sugar N-acetyl-D-galactosamine (“GalNAc”) to reduce the expression of specific target genes in the liver. Under the Novo Collaboration Agreement, the Company is providing Novo with exclusive and non-exclusive licenses and manufacturing support to enable Novo to commercialize products derived from or containing compounds developed pursuant to such agreement.
Under the terms of the Novo Collaboration Agreement, Novo paid the Company an upfront payment of $175.0 million, subject to delivery of target information, in January 2020. The Company is also eligible to receive an additional $75.0 million ($25.0 million at the end of each of the first three years of the Novo Collaboration Agreement), contingent upon the Company delivering GalXC molecules for a defined number of targets on an annual basis, and additional payments totaling up to approximately $357.5 million per target upon achievement of specified development, regulatory, and commercial milestones. In addition, Novo will pay the Company mid-single-digits to mid-teens royalties on product sales on a country-by-country and product-by-product basis until the later of 10 years after the date of first commercial sale of each product in such country, expiration of specified patent rights in such country, or the expiration of specified regulatory exclusivity in such country for GalXC products, subject to royalty step-down provisions set forth in the agreement.
In connection with the Novo Collaboration Agreement, the Company and Novo entered into the Novo Share Issuance Agreement on November 15, 2019, pursuant to which the Company agreed to issue to Novo 2,279,982 shares (the “Novo Shares”) of the Company’s common stock, par value $0.0001 per share (“Common Stock”), at a purchase price of $21.93 per share, for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $50.0 million.
During the fourth quarter of 2020, Novo nominated its first candidate under the Novo Collaboration Agreement. In conjunction with the nomination of the first development candidate, Dicerna earned a $2.5 million milestone, which the Company received in February 2021. Also during the fourth quarter of 2020, Novo confirmed that Dicerna met its annual obligation to deliver GalXC molecules for a defined number of targets for the first year of the Novo Collaboration Agreement, entitling the Company to a $25.0 million payment, which the Company received in February 2021.
Accounting Analysis
The Novo Collaboration Agreement and the Novo Share Issuance Agreement (collectively, “the Novo Agreements”) were executed on the same date and negotiated as a package. Management therefore concluded that the Novo Agreements are to be combined for accounting purposes and concluded that Novo is a customer in this arrangement pursuant to the revenue recognition guidance.
The Company identified contract promises under the agreement for the license of intellectual property and know-how rights for selected gene targets and research and development services to develop a clinical candidate for each selected gene target, including manufacturing activities. The Company may also be required to provide research and development services for an unspecified number of targets, with the goal of the collaboration being to develop clinical candidates for each of the selected gene targets. The Company determined that the license and research and development services were not capable of being distinct or distinct within the context of the contract. The research and development services to be provided by Dicerna are specialized in nature, specifically with respect to the Company’s therapeutic expertise related to RNAi and the Company’s GalXC conjugates. In addition, there is an interdependent relationship between the contract promises. As such, the Company concluded that there is a single identified combined performance obligation consisting of a license and research and development services.
The Company may be required to perform certain additional services after Novo’s nomination of a development candidate. These services include Phase 1-related activities, such as manufacturing through the approval of an IND application for a development candidate, research and development activities to support the filing of an IND application for the first development candidate, and other development services to support Novo’s development activities related to any development candidates. The Company will be reimbursed by Novo for these additional services. Because the provision of these additional goods and services are conditional on Novo electing to nominate a development candidate, the Company has concluded that these goods and services represent customer options and are not considered performance obligations.
The total transaction price for the Novo Agreements is $256.7 million, consisting of the total $175.0 million upfront compensation, the $75.0 million additional aggregate payments described above (payable in equal annual payments of $25.0 million), and a $4.2 million premium on the sale of shares under the Novo Share Issuance Agreement. The Company applied equity accounting guidance to measure the $45.8 million recorded in equity upon the issuance of the shares. The upfront payment of $175.0 million was payable to the Company upon the delivery of a bioinformatics package and mapping plan for at least one of the initial targets selected by Novo and was paid in January 2020. If the Novo Collaboration Agreement is terminated prior to the third anniversary of its effective date, the Company is entitled to 80% of the outstanding and unearned annual payments. The Company assumed that the mapped targets will be delivered and that the contract will not be canceled. The Company has experience with mapping targets, and therefore, concluded that such amount does not need to be constrained. Accordingly, the Company included the $75.0 million of additional payments in the transaction price. As Novo nominated its first candidate under the Novo Collaboration Agreement, Dicerna earned a $2.5 million milestone in the fourth quarter of 2020, and this milestone is included in the transaction price.
The Company used the most likely amount method to estimate variable consideration and estimated that the most likely amount for each potential preclinical, development, and regulatory variable consideration milestone payment under this agreement was zero, as the achievement of those milestones is uncertain and highly susceptible to factors outside of the Company’s control. Accordingly, all such milestones were excluded from the transaction price. Management will reevaluate the transaction price at the end of each reporting period and as uncertain events are resolved or other changes in circumstances occur, and will adjust the transaction price as necessary. Sales-based royalties, including milestone payments based on the level of sales, were also excluded from the transaction price, as the license is deemed to be the predominant item to which the royalties relate. The Company will recognize such revenue at the later of (i) when the related sales occur, or (ii) when the performance obligation to which some or all of the royalty has been allocated has been satisfied (or partially satisfied).
Revenue associated with the performance obligation is being recognized as services are provided using a cost-to-cost measure of progress method. The transfer of control occurs over time, as the Company’s performance does not create an asset with alternative use, and the Company has an enforceable right to payment for performance completed to date. In management’s judgment, this input method is the best measure of progress towards satisfying the performance obligation and reflects a faithful depiction of the transfer of goods and services.
The aggregate amount of the transaction price allocated to the Company’s unsatisfied or partially unsatisfied performance obligations under the Novo Collaboration Agreement at December 31, 2020 was $242.8 million. As of December 31, 2020, the Company expected to recognize the balance of deferred revenue over the remaining portion of the five-year research term, or four years, which may be extended for up to two years.
Roche collaboration agreement
Background
On October 30, 2019, the Company and Roche entered into a Collaboration and License Agreement (the “Roche Collaboration Agreement”). Under the terms of the Roche Collaboration Agreement, the Company and Roche will seek to progress RG6346, the companies’ investigational therapy in Phase 1 clinical development, toward worldwide development and commercialization, as well as provide an option for the companies to collaborate in the discovery, development, and commercialization of oligonucleotide therapeutics intended for the treatment of hepatitis B virus (“HBV”).
The Roche Collaboration Agreement requires that Dicerna complete the ongoing Phase 1 clinical trial, along with additional Phase 1 cohorts that were requested by Roche for which Roche will reimburse the Company for the cost of the additional cohorts, after which Roche will lead the development and commercialization of the RG6346 program. Roche also had until receipt of interim Phase 1 data from the RG6346 Phase 1 study (but no later than December 31, 2020) to initiate a research and development collaboration with the Company to pursue up to five targets selected by Roche, (each a “Selected Target”), which are intended primarily to treat HBV. Under an amendment to the Roche Collaboration Agreement in June 2020, Roche and Dicerna agreed to extend the date for nomination of targets from December 31, 2020 to January 15, 2021, subject to further potential extension by the parties due to the COVID-19 global pandemic shutdowns. Under the terms of the Roche Collaboration Agreement, the goal of such research and development collaboration will be to select compounds developed by the Company or Roche for Roche’s continued development and commercialization. The Company’s and Roche’s research and early development organizations will work exclusively with each other during the research and development collaboration period on the discovery, research, and development of such targets selected by Roche, which includes the performance of certain services by Dicerna. Under the Roche Collaboration Agreement, the Company is providing Roche with exclusive and non-exclusive licenses to support Roche’s activities and to enable Roche to commercialize products derived from or containing compounds developed pursuant to such agreement. In April 2020, Roche nominated the first of up to five targets under the research and development portion of the Roche Collaboration Agreement.
Under the terms of the Roche Collaboration Agreement, Roche paid the Company a non-refundable upfront payment of $200.0 million in January 2020. The Company is also eligible to receive additional payments totaling up to approximately $1.47 billion, which includes payments upon achievement of specified development, regulatory, and commercial milestones. In addition, Roche will pay the Company up to mid-teens percent royalties on worldwide product sales. Royalties are payable until the later of 10 years after first commercial sale of each product in a country, expiration of patent rights in a country, or for products containing RG6346 in a given country, the expiration of data or regulatory exclusivity, subject to certain royalty step-down provisions set forth in the agreement. In addition, the Company has an option to co-fund the development of products under the agreement and, if exercised, receive high-twenties to mid-thirties royalty rates on net sales of products in the United States. If the Company exercises the co-funding option, it also has an option to co-promote products containing RG6346 in the United States.
Accounting Analysis
The Company concluded that Roche is a customer in this arrangement pursuant to the revenue recognition guidance. The Company identified contract promises under the agreement for (i) the license of intellectual property and know-how rights related to the lead compound, (ii) research and development services to complete the Phase 1 study associated with the lead compound, (iii) lead compound transfer activities, (iv) manufacturing of clinical supply for the lead compound Phase 1 study, and (v) Roche’s option to receive additional goods and services related to the research and development collaboration. The Company determined that the Roche Collaboration Agreement contains two performance obligations consisting of: (i) a combined performance obligation that includes a license, related development and manufacturing services to complete the Phase 1 study, and manufacturing obligations through the completion of the Phase 1 study related to the lead compound (the “RG6346 Performance Obligation”), and (ii) a material right to enter into a research and development collaboration to develop additional targets. While evaluating contract promises to determine whether each was capable of being distinct and distinct within the context of the contract, management considered the specialized nature of the services to be provided by Dicerna, specifically with respect to the Company’s therapeutic expertise related to RNAi and the Company’s GalXC conjugates, and the interdependent relationship between the contract promises. As such, the Company concluded that the promises of the license and research and development services related to the lead compound were not distinct from each other. Accordingly, these promises were combined into one performance obligation, the RG6346 Performance Obligation. Upon Roche’s exercise of its option to enter into the research and development collaboration for which no additional consideration will be received, Roche has the right to nominate up to five additional targets. For each target nominated, Roche will receive a license to the Selected Target, for which the Company will perform research services through clinical candidate selection. Upon Roche’s nomination of a target, the Company has concluded that the license and related research services through clinical candidate selection for each Selected Target represents a combined performance obligation, which is separate from the RG6346 Performance Obligation. The Company is not required to perform services on more than three Selected Targets at any time. Roche also has the right to replace up to three Selected Targets if a clinical candidate cannot be identified during the research term.
The total transaction price for the Roche Collaboration Agreement is $206.5 million, consisting of the $200.0 million upfront payment and the estimated reimbursement from Roche related to the additional cohorts. The Company used the most likely amount method to estimate the amount of reimbursement, which was considered variable consideration, related to the additional cohorts. As reimbursement will be made as the Company performs the related services, the Company concluded that such amount does not need to be constrained, and therefore, included the full amount of the estimated reimbursement by Roche in the transaction price.
The Company also estimated that the most likely amount for each potential development and regulatory variable consideration milestone payment under this agreement was zero, as the achievement of those milestones is uncertain and highly susceptible to factors outside of the Company’s control. Accordingly, all such milestones were excluded from the transaction price. Management will reevaluate the transaction price at the end of each reporting period and as uncertain events are resolved or other changes in circumstances occur, and will adjust the transaction price as necessary. Sales-based royalties, including milestone payments based on the level of sales, were also excluded from the transaction price, as the license is deemed to be the predominant item to which the royalties relate. The Company will recognize such revenue at the later of (i) when the related sales occur, or (ii) when the performance obligation to which some or all of the royalty has been allocated has been satisfied (or partially satisfied).
The Company allocated the $206.5 million transaction price to the performance obligations on a relative standalone selling price basis. The Company estimated the standalone selling price for the lead compound performance obligation of $161.0 million using the adjusted market assessment approach, whereby the Company adjusted comparable third-party transactions to reflect the stage of development of the Company’s asset. To determine the estimated standalone selling price of the material right of $45.5 million, the Company estimated the standalone selling price of the underlying performance obligations included in the material right and estimated the probability of Roche exercising such underlying performance obligations. The Company concluded that the research and development collaboration material right contained (i) five material rights to receive a selected target license and related research and development services, and (ii) three material rights to receive a replacement selected target license and related research and development services. Upon the nomination of a target, the Selected Target license and related research services through clinical candidate selection will be accounted for as a combined performance obligation. The value of the material right related to the Selected Target is included in the transaction price for the combined performance obligation. The variable consideration related to the reimbursement from Roche for the additional Phase 1 cohorts and any milestones and royalties that are achieved will be allocated specifically to the lead compound performance obligation, as this variable consideration relates specifically to the Company’s satisfaction of the lead compound performance obligation and such allocation has been determined to be consistent with the allocation objective of revenue recognition guidance.
Revenue associated with the lead compound performance obligation is recognized as services are provided using a cost-to-cost measure of progress method. The transfer of control occurs over time, as the Company’s performance does not create an asset with alternative use, and the Company has an enforceable right to payment for performance completed to date. In management’s judgment, this input method is the best measure of progress towards satisfying the performance obligation and reflects a faithful depiction of the transfer of goods and services. The transaction price allocated to the research and development collaboration material right will be recognized based on the timing of recognition of the underlying performance obligations that comprise the material right, or upon expiry of the material right if such right is not exercised.
The aggregate amount of the transaction price allocated to the Company’s unsatisfied or partially unsatisfied performance obligations under the Roche Collaboration Agreement at December 31, 2020 was $136.3 million. As of December 31, 2020, the Company expects to recognize the balance of deferred revenue during the estimated three-year research term, which may be extended for up to two years.
Lilly collaboration and share purchase agreements
Background
On October 25, 2018, the Company entered into a Collaboration and License Agreement with Lilly (the “Lilly Collaboration Agreement”) for the discovery, development, and commercialization of potential new medicines in the areas of cardiometabolic disease, neurodegenerative diseases, and pain. Under the terms of the Lilly Collaboration Agreement, the Company and Lilly will use the Company’s proprietary GalXC RNAi technology to progress new drug targets toward clinical development and commercialization. In addition, the Company and Lilly will collaborate on non-liver (i.e., extrahepatic) tissues, including neural tissues.
The Company will work exclusively with Lilly in the neurodegenerative disease and pain fields, with the exception of mutually agreed upon orphan indications. Additionally, the Company will work exclusively with Lilly on select targets in the cardiometabolic field. Under the Lilly Collaboration Agreement, the Company will provide Lilly with exclusive and non-exclusive licenses to support the companies’ activities and to enable Lilly to commercialize products derived from or containing compounds developed pursuant to such agreement. The Lilly Collaboration Agreement provides for three initially named hepatocyte targets, and the Company and Lilly developed research programs with the goal of researching and developing multiple lead candidates directed to each of these initial targets. The Lilly Collaboration Agreement contemplates in excess of ten targets.
Lilly paid the Company a non-refundable upfront payment of $100.0 million. The Company is also eligible to receive up to $350.0 million per target in development and commercialization milestones, in addition to a $5.0 million payment, which will become due for each of the extrahepatic targets when a product candidate achieves proof of principle in an animal model. In addition, the Company is eligible to earn mid-single- to low-double-digit royalties on product sales on a country-by-country and product-by-product basis until the later of expiration of patent rights in a country, the expiration of data or regulatory exclusivity in such country, or 10 years after the first product sale in such country, subject to certain royalty step-down provisions set forth in the agreement.
Simultaneously with the entry into the Lilly Collaboration Agreement, the Company and Lilly entered into a Share Purchase Agreement (the “Lilly Share Issuance Agreement”), pursuant to which Lilly purchased 5,414,185 shares of the Company’s common stock at $18.47 per share, for an aggregate purchase price of $100.0 million.
During the fourth quarter of 2020, Dicerna achieved a milestone associated with the first filing of an Investigational New Drug (“IND”) application for LY3561774, targeting the ANGPTL3 gene for the treatment of dyslipidemia, with the FDA, entitling the Company to a $10.0 million payment. The Company received this payment in the fourth quarter of 2020.
In February 2021, Lilly notified us of their decision to extend for an additional year the initial research collaboration term for the extrahepatic targets subject to the Lilly Collaboration Agreement. Under the agreement between the companies, Lilly has the option to extend the three-year initial research collaboration term for these extrahepatic targets for up to three consecutive one-year periods. This first extension allows the research program for these extrahepatic targets under the collaboration between the two companies to continue through October 2022.
Accounting Analysis
The Lilly Share Issuance Agreement is to be combined with the Lilly Collaboration Agreement (together, the “Combined Agreements”) for accounting purposes. The Company concluded that Lilly is a customer in this arrangement. As such, the element of the arrangement unrelated to the issuance of the shares falls within the scope of the revenue recognition guidance. The Company identified contract promises under the Combined Agreements for licenses of intellectual property and know-how rights, associated research and development services for targets and for exploring new applications of the Company’s RNAi technology to non-liver targets, and participation on a joint steering committee. The Company determined that the contract promises were not separately identifiable and were not distinct or distinct within the context of the contract due to the specialized nature of the services to be provided by Dicerna, specifically with respect to the Company’s therapeutic expertise related to RNAi and the Company’s GalXC conjugates, and the interdependent relationship between the contract promises. As such, the Company concluded that there was a single identified combined performance obligation. The total transaction price for the Combined Agreements is $158.7 million, consisting of the total $100.0 million upfront compensation, $48.7 million premium on the sale of shares under the Lilly Share Issuance Agreement, and $10.0 million milestone achievement of the first IND filing. The Company applied equity accounting guidance to measure the $51.3 million recorded in equity upon the issuance of the shares.
The Company used the most likely amount method to estimate variable consideration and estimated that the most likely amount for each potential development milestone payment under this agreement was zero, as the achievement of those milestones is uncertain and highly susceptible to factors outside of the Company’s control. Accordingly, all such milestones were excluded from the transaction price. Management will reevaluate the transaction price at the end of each reporting period and as uncertain events are resolved or other changes in circumstances occur and will adjust the transaction price as necessary. Sales-based royalties, including milestone payments based on the level of sales, were also excluded from the transaction price, as the license is deemed to be the predominant item to which the royalties relate. The Company will recognize such revenue at the later of (i) when the related sales occur, or (ii) when the performance obligation to which some or all of the royalty has been allocated has been satisfied (or partially satisfied).
Revenue associated with the performance obligation will be recognized as services are provided using a cost-to-cost measure of progress method. The transfer of control occurs over time and, in management’s judgment, this input method is the best measure of progress towards satisfying the performance obligation and reflects a faithful depiction of the transfer of goods and services.
The aggregate amount of the transaction price allocated to the Company’s unsatisfied or partially unsatisfied performance obligations under the Lilly Collaboration Agreement at December 31, 2020 was $104.7 million. As of December 31, 2020, the Company expected to recognize the majority of this amount over the remaining research term of the agreement, which is expected to extend through the fourth quarter of 2022.
Alexion collaboration and equity agreements
Background
On October 22, 2018, the Company and Alexion entered into a Collaborative Research and License Agreement (the “Alexion Collaboration Agreement”). The Alexion Collaboration Agreement is for the joint discovery and development of RNAi therapies for complement-mediated diseases. The Company and Alexion will collaborate on the discovery and development of two subcutaneously delivered GalXC candidates, currently in preclinical development, for the treatment of complement-mediated diseases with potential global commercialization by Alexion. The Company will lead the joint discovery and research efforts through the preclinical stage, and Alexion will lead development efforts beginning with Phase 1 studies. The Company will be responsible for manufacturing of the GalXC candidates through the completion of Phase 1, and certain related costs will be paid by Alexion. Alexion will be solely responsible for the manufacturing of any product candidate subsequent to the completion of Phase 1. The Alexion Collaboration Agreement provides Alexion with exclusive worldwide licenses as well as development and commercial rights to the GalXC RNAi molecules developed in the collaboration in exchange for development and approval-related milestones, sales milestones, and royalties on future product sales.
Alexion paid the Company a non-refundable upfront payment of $22.0 million. The Alexion Collaboration Agreement also provides for potential additional payments to the Company of up to $600.0 million from proceeds from target option exercises and development and sales milestones, as defined in the agreement, which includes: (i) option exercise fees of up to $20.0 million, representing $10.0 million for each of the targets selected; (ii) development milestones of up to $105.0 million for each product; and (iii) aggregate sales milestones of up to $160.0 million. Alexion also agreed to pay the Company mid-single- to low-double-digit royalties on potential product sales on a country-by-country, product-by-product basis until the later of the expiration of patent rights in a country, the expiration of market or regulatory exclusivity in such country, or 10 years after the first product sale in such country, subject to certain royalty step-down provisions set forth in the agreement.
Simultaneously with the entry into the Alexion Collaboration Agreement, the Company and Alexion entered into a Share Purchase Agreement (the “Alexion Share Issuance Agreement”), pursuant to which Alexion purchased 835,834 shares of the Company’s common stock at $17.95 per share at issuance, for an aggregate purchase price of $15.0 million. Management concluded that the Alexion Share Issuance Agreement was to be combined with the Alexion Collaboration Agreement (together, the “Alexion Agreements”) for accounting purposes. With respect to the $15.0 million of cash received upon issuance of the shares, the Company applied equity accounting guidance to measure the $9.1 million recorded in equity upon the issuance of the shares, and the remaining $5.9 million was included as a component of the transaction price attributable to the revenue arrangement.
Accounting Analysis
The Company concluded that Alexion is a customer in this arrangement, and as such, the element of the arrangement unrelated to the issuance of the shares falls within the scope of the revenue recognition guidance. The Company identified the following promises under the arrangement: (i) the grant of licenses of intellectual property and know-how rights; (ii) the option to select additional targets; (iii) the option to perform validation testing on additional targets; (iv) associated research and development services for the initial and, as applicable, additional targets; and (v) participation in the joint steering committee. The Company concluded that the research and development services were not capable of being distinct from the research and development licenses, and were not distinct within the context of the contract, and should therefore be combined into a single performance obligation for each program. The Company considered the level of Alexion’s therapeutic expertise specifically related to RNAi, as well as Alexion’s know-how of the Company’s GalXC conjugates, and concluded that Alexion could not benefit from the granted license on its own or together with other resources that are readily available to Alexion, including relationships with oligonucleotide vendors who synthesize GalXC conjugates under contract with the Company. The Company also concluded that, while participation on the joint steering committee was capable of being distinct, participation is not distinct from the research and development services within the context of the contract, as they are both inputs to the combined output of a target that successfully achieves IND approval. As a result, the combination of the license of intellectual property together with the provision of research and development services and participation on the joint steering committee together represent the highest level of goods and services that can be deemed distinct.
Additionally, the Company determined that the options to select additional targets and to perform validation testing on additional targets were not priced at a discount and, as such, do not provide Alexion with material rights. Based on management’s assessments, the Company identified a single performance obligation, namely, the combined license and research and development services, for each of the two initially nominated targets.
The Alexion Collaboration Agreement transaction price is $48.2 million, which is comprised of the $22.0 million upfront payment, the $5.9 million equity premium identified upon issuance of the shares, as described above, $17.0 million in aggregate contingent milestone payments that were either received or probable of achievement and under the Company’s control, and $3.3 million of variable consideration for certain manufacturing initiatives reimbursed by Alexion.
The Company used the most likely amount method to estimate variable consideration and estimated that the most likely amount for each potential development milestone payment beyond the three initial research program milestones under this agreement was zero, as the achievement of those milestones is uncertain and highly susceptible to factors outside of the Company’s control. Accordingly, such milestones were initially excluded from the transaction price. Management will reevaluate the transaction price at the end of each reporting period and as uncertain events are resolved or other changes in circumstances occur and will adjust the transaction price as necessary. Sales-based royalties, including milestone payments based on the level of sales, were also excluded from the transaction price, as the license is deemed to be the predominant item to which the royalties relate. The Company will recognize such revenue at the later of (i) when the related sales occur, or (ii) when the performance obligation to which some or all of the royalty has been allocated has been satisfied (or partially satisfied).
Revenue associated with the performance obligation is being recognized as services are provided using an input method based on a cost-to-cost measure of progress. The transfer of control occurs over time and, in management’s judgment, this input method is the best measure of progress towards satisfying the performance obligations and reflects a faithful depiction of the transfer of goods and services.
In November 2019, the Company and Alexion amended the Alexion Collaboration Agreement (the “Alexion Amendment”) to clarify funding of certain manufacturing costs for each of the two initial targets and increased milestone payments for the additional targets if Alexion exercised its options for the two additional targets.
In December 2019, Alexion exercised its options for the exclusive rights to two additional targets within the complement pathway for the discovery and development of GalXC molecules. These exercises expanded the companies’ existing research collaboration and license agreement to encompass four targets within the complement pathway. In connection with the option exercises, Alexion paid Dicerna a total of $20.0 million, or $10.0 million in option exercise fees per additional new target, that will be recognized into revenue as the related services are performed.
The Company concluded that the Alexion Amendment modified the original agreement, as the transaction price was changed as a result of Dicerna assuming responsibility for certain manufacturing costs associated with the initial targets. For accounting purposes, the exercise of the options created a separate new arrangement from the Alexion Collaboration Agreement for the two new targets.
The Company concluded that Alexion is a customer in the Alexion Amendment. The Company identified the following promises under the Alexion Amendment: (i) the grant of licenses of intellectual property and know-how rights, and (ii) associated research and development services for the additional targets. The Company concluded that the research and development services were not capable of being distinct from the licenses and were not distinct within the context of the contract, and should therefore be combined into a single performance obligation for each program. Similar to the initial targets, the Company considered the level of Alexion’s therapeutic expertise specifically related to RNAi, as well as Alexion’s know-how of the Company’s GalXC conjugates, and concluded that Alexion could not benefit from the granted license on its own or together with other resources that are readily available to Alexion. As a result, the combination of the license of intellectual property together with the provision of research and development services represents the highest level of goods and services that can be deemed distinct. Based on management’s assessments, the Company identified a single performance obligation, namely, the combined license and research and development services, for each of the two additional targets. The transaction price of the Alexion Amendment was determined to be $35.0 million, which is comprised of the $20.0 million in option exercise fees and $15.0 million in aggregate contingent milestone payments that were probable of achievement and under the Company’s control.
The aggregate amount of the transaction price allocated to the Company’s unsatisfied or partially unsatisfied performance obligations under the Alexion Agreements at December 31, 2020 was $46.5 million. As of December 31, 2020, the Company expects the majority of deferred revenue to be recognized through the third quarter of 2023.
The following table provides a summary of revenue recognized for the Alexion Agreement and the Alexion Amendment:
YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31,
2020 2019 2018
Alexion Agreement $ 27,030 $ 4,405 $ 110
Alexion Amendment 5,213 - -
Total $ 32,243 $ 4,405 $ 110
The following tables provide a summary of deferred revenue balances for the Alexion Agreement and the Alexion Amendment:
DECEMBER 31, 2020
CURRENT NONCURRENT TOTAL
Alexion Agreement $ 9,216 $ 7,528 $ 16,744
Alexion Amendment 9,464 20,323 29,787
Total $ 18,680 $ 27,851 $ 46,531
DECEMBER 31, 2019
CURRENT NONCURRENT TOTAL
Alexion Agreement $ 26,648 $ 6,348 $ 32,996
Alexion Amendment 1,197 18,803 20,000
Total $ 27,845 $ 25,151 $ 52,996
BI agreement and related amendment
Background
On October 27, 2017, the Company entered into a collaborative research and license agreement with BI (the “BI Agreement”), pursuant to which the Company and BI jointly research and develop product candidates for the treatment of chronic liver disease using GalXC. The BI Agreement is for the development of product candidates against one target gene with an option for BI to add the development of product candidates that target a second gene (the “Second Target”). Pursuant to the BI Agreement, Dicerna granted BI a worldwide license in connection with the research and development of such product candidates and transferred certain intellectual property rights of the selected product candidates to BI for clinical development and commercialization. Dicerna also may provide assistance to BI in order to help BI further develop selected product candidates. BI paid Dicerna a non-refundable upfront payment of $10.0 million for the first target. BI also agreed to reimburse Dicerna certain third-party expenses of $0.3 million.
The Company is eligible to receive up to $191.0 million in potential development and commercial milestones related to the initial target. Dicerna is also eligible to receive royalty payments on potential global net sales, subject to certain adjustments, tiered from high single-digits up to low double-digits. BI’s Second Target option provided for an option fee payment of $5.0 million and success-based development and commercialization milestones and royalty payments to Dicerna.
Milestone payments that are contingent upon the Company’s performance under the BI Agreement include potential developmental milestones totaling $99.0 million. All potential net sales milestones, totaling $95.0 million, will be accounted for in the same manner as royalties.
Accounting Analysis
The Company concluded that BI is a customer in this arrangement, and as such, the arrangement falls within the scope of the revenue recognition guidance. The Company identified the following promises under the contract: the license of intellectual property and conducting agreed-upon research program services. The Company concluded that the license and research and development services are not capable of being distinct and are not distinct within the context of the contract; therefore, the Company considers these to be one performance obligation. The Company concluded that the option underlying the transfer of future licenses and potential associated research for any not-yet-known target gene is not a performance obligation of the contract at inception because the option fee reflects the standalone selling price of the option, and therefore, the option is not considered to be a material right. The Company considered the level of BI’s therapeutic expertise specifically related to RNAi, as well as BI’s know-how with regard to the Company’s GalXC conjugates, and concluded that BI cannot benefit from the granted license on its own or together with other resources that are readily available to BI, including relationships with oligonucleotide vendors who synthesize GalXC conjugates under contract with the Company. As a result, the combination of the license of intellectual property together with the provision of research and development support services represents the highest level of goods and services that can be deemed distinct.
Based on management’s evaluation, the $10.0 million non-refundable upfront fee and the $0.3 million agreed-upon reimbursable third-party expenses constituted the amount of the consideration to be included in the transaction price and were allocated to the performance obligation identified. None of the development milestones were included in the transaction price during the period, since none of such milestone amounts are within the control of the Company and are not considered probable to occur until confirmed by BI, at BI’s sole discretion. Any consideration related to commercial sales-based milestones (including royalties) will be recognized at the later of (i) when the related sales occur, or (ii) when the performance obligation to which some or all of the royalty has been allocated has been satisfied (or partially satisfied).
The $10.3 million transaction price for the first target was recognized through July 2019, which was the point when the Company’s obligation to provide research support services to BI for the first target ended. Related revenue was recognized on a straight-line basis, which was, in management’s judgment, an appropriate measure of progress toward satisfying the performance obligation.
BI contract amendment - Background
In October 2018, BI exercised its Second Target option, which entitled the Company to a non-refundable payment of $5.0 million and reimbursement of $0.7 million for certain third-party expenses. The terms of the Second Target option exercise and related rights and obligations associated with the Second Target were agreed to in an Additional Target Agreement (the “ATA”), which was entered into on December 31, 2018.
Under the terms of the ATA, BI is responsible for future clinical development and commercialization of candidate products for the Second Target. Additionally, during the term of the research program, BI will reimburse the Company for certain expenses. The Company is eligible to receive up to $170.0 million in potential development and commercial milestones related to the Second Target. The Company is also eligible to receive tiered royalty payments on potential global net sales, subject to certain adjustments, in the mid-single digits. Except as otherwise set forth in the ATA, development of the Second Target is subject to the terms of the original BI Agreement.
BI contract amendment - Accounting Analysis
The exercise of the Second Target option on December 31, 2018 through the ATA created a new arrangement for accounting purposes, and management determined that the $5.0 million exercise price with the $0.7 million of reimbursable expenses was representative of the standalone selling price. Consistent with the reasons described related to the initial target, management concluded that the non-refundable Second Target option exercise fee (akin to an upfront payment) and reimbursable expenses constituted the amount of the consideration to be included in the transaction price and have been allocated to a single performance obligation. The basis for the conclusions regarding the treatment of development and sales-based milestones associated with the Second Target are consistent with those associated with the initial combined performance obligation under the BI Agreement. The Company reevaluates the transaction price in each reporting period and as uncertain events are resolved or other changes in circumstances occur.
Consistent with the first target, revenue is recognized on a straight-line basis, which is in management’s judgment an appropriate measure of progress toward satisfying the performance obligation. The Company began recognizing the $5.7 million transaction price as revenue in January 2019 and continued through November 2020, which was the point when the Company’s obligation to provide research support services to BI for the Second Target ended. There were no unsatisfied performance obligations under the BI ATA at December 31, 2020.
In addition to establishing the terms of the Second Target option exercise, the ATA also amended the BI Agreement to provide the parties the opportunity to consider the development of product candidates targeting a further additional target gene (the “Third Target Option”). Per the ATA, if BI elects to exercise the Third Target Option following Dicerna’s presentation of data for a new product candidate, the parties must also agree to a research work plan and budget for the additional gene and negotiate development and commercialization milestones and royalty payments to the Company, and upon such agreement and consummation of such exercise, BI would make an option fee payment to the Company of $5.0 million. This option exercise fee is consistent with the Second Target option exercise fee, which management concluded was representative of the standalone selling price. If BI chooses to exercise the Third Target Option, the Company will be responsible for the discovery and initial profiling of the product candidates, including primary preclinical studies, synthesis, and delivery. BI will be responsible for evaluating and selecting the product candidates for further development. If BI selects one or more product candidates, it will be responsible for further preclinical development, clinical development, manufacturing, and commercialization of those products. If the Third Target Option is exercised, such exercise would result in a new arrangement for accounting purposes, as the licensing rights and research and development services underlying the Third Target Option are distinct from those associated with the initial and Second Targets.
Collaboration partners financial summary
Payments received from our collaboration partners during the year ended December 31, 2020 were as follows:
AMOUNT
Novo $ 175,000
Roche 201,981
Lilly 10,000
Alexion 22,594
BI 260
Total $ 409,835
The following table provides a summary of revenue recognized:
YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31,
2020 2019 2018
Novo $ 13,874 $ - $ -
Roche 73,927 - -
Lilly 41,529 13,127 -
Alexion 32,243 4,405 110
BI 2,734 6,297 6,066
Other - 75 -
Total $ 164,307 $ 23,904 $ 6,176
The following tables provide a summary of deferred revenue balances:
DECEMBER 31, 2020
CURRENT NONCURRENT TOTAL
Novo $ 30,169 $ 162,630 $ 192,799
Roche 49,493 81,273 130,766
Lilly 40,195 64,482 104,677
Alexion 18,680 27,851 46,531
Total $ 138,537 $ 336,236 $ 474,773
DECEMBER 31, 2019
CURRENT NONCURRENT TOTAL
Novo $ 813 $ 3,359 $ 4,172
Roche 118,094 81,906 200,000
Lilly 63,233 72,314 135,547
Alexion 27,845 25,151 52,996
BI 2,273 - 2,273
Total $ 212,258 $ 182,730 $ 394,988
During the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018, the Company recognized the following revenues as a result of changes in contract liability balances:
YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31,
Revenue recognized in the period from: 2020 2019 2018
Amounts included in deferred revenue at the beginning of the period (1)
$ 149,716 $ 23,829 $ 6,066
Performance obligations satisfied (or partially satisfied) in previous reporting periods (2)
$ 2,109 $ - $ -
(1) The Company determines the revenue recognized in each period from contract liabilities by first attributing revenue to the individual contract liability balance outstanding at the beginning of the period. If additional consideration is received on those contracts in subsequent periods, we assume all revenue recognized in the reporting period first applies to the beginning contract liability as opposed to the new consideration for the period.
(2) Relates to changes in estimated costs for the Company’s future performance obligations and estimated variable consideration.
9. STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Preferred stock
The Company has authorized up to 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock, $0.0001 par value per share, for issuance. The preferred stock will have such rights, preferences, privileges and restrictions, including voting rights, dividend rights, conversion rights, redemption privileges, and liquidation preferences, as shall be determined by the Company’s Board of Directors upon its issuance. At December 31, 2020 and 2019, there were no shares of preferred stock outstanding.
Issuances of Common Stock
On April 20, 2018, the Company entered into a Share Issuance Agreement with Alnylam (“Alnylam Share Issuance Agreement”), pursuant to which the Company agreed to issue to Alnylam 983,208 shares in satisfaction of the Company’s obligation under the Settlement Agreement to deliver shares to Alnylam (see Note 14). The Alnylam Share Issuance Agreement contains customary representations and warranties of each party. The transaction contemplated by the Alnylam Share Issuance Agreement was closed on April 24, 2018.
On September 11, 2018, the Company completed an underwritten follow-on public offering of 7,680,492 shares of common stock (the “2018 Offering”). In connection with the 2018 Offering, the Company entered into an underwriting agreement (the “2018 Underwriting Agreement”) with Citigroup Global Markets Inc. and Leerink Partners LLC as representatives of the underwriters listed in the 2018 Underwriting Agreement (collectively, the “2018 Underwriters”), pursuant to which the Company granted to the 2018 Underwriters a 30-day option to purchase up to an additional 1,152,073 shares of the Company’s common stock. Upon completion of the sale of 8,832,565 shares to the 2018 Underwriters, the Company received gross proceeds of $115.0 million.
In connection with the Alexion Collaboration Agreement, the Company and Alexion entered into the Alexion Share Issuance Agreement on October 22, 2018, pursuant to which the Company sold to Alexion 835,834 shares of the Company’s common stock at $17.95 per share for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $15.0 million, of which $9.1 million was allocated to the share issuance for accounting purposes.
In connection with the Lilly Collaboration Agreement, the Company and Lilly entered into the Lilly Share Issuance Agreement on October 25, 2018, pursuant to which the Company sold to Lilly 5,414,185 shares of common stock at $18.47 per share for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $100.0 million, of which $51.3 million was allocated to the share issuance for accounting purposes. The closing of the transactions contemplated by the Lilly Collaboration Agreement and the Lilly Share Issuance Agreement occurred on December 19, 2018.
In connection with the Novo Collaboration Agreement, the Company and Novo entered into the Novo Share Issuance Agreement on November 15, 2019, pursuant to which the Company sold to Novo 2,279,982 shares of common stock at $21.93 per share for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $50.0 million, of which $45.8 million was allocated to the share issuance for accounting purposes. The closing of the transactions contemplated by the Novo Collaboration Agreement and the Novo Share Issuance Agreement occurred on December 27, 2019.
On February 6, 2020, the Company issued and sold an aggregate of approximately $40.0 million of shares of its common stock to a single institutional investor pursuant to a common stock Sales Agreement with Cowen and Company, LLC as the sales agent. In this transaction, the Company sold an aggregate of 2,077,500 shares of common stock at a price of $19.25 per share, resulting in net proceeds of approximately $39.2 million after a deduction of approximately $0.8 million in sales commissions. The shares in the offering were sold pursuant to a shelf registration statement declared effective by the SEC on May 31, 2018 and a prospectus supplement filed with the SEC on June 1, 2018.
10. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
Equity Incentive Plans
As of December 31, 2020 the Company’s approved equity incentive plans include: the Third Amended and Restated 2007 Employee, Director and Consultant Stock Plan (“2007 Plan”); the 2010 Employee, Director and Consultant Equity Incentive Plan (“2010 Plan”); the 2014 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (“2014 ESPP”); the Amended and Restated 2014 Performance Incentive Plan (“2014 Plan”); and the 2016 Inducement Plan (“2016 Plan”). These plans are administered by the Board of Directors and permit the granting of stock options, stock appreciation rights, stock bonuses, restricted stock, performance stock, stock units, phantom stock, or similar rights to purchase or acquire shares. Upon adoption of the 2014 Plan, the Company no longer grants new equity awards under its 2007 Plan or 2010 Plan.
Amended and Restated 2014 Performance Incentive Plan
On January 14, 2014, the Board of Directors adopted the 2014 Plan which authorized the issuance of up to 1,900,000 shares of the Company’s common stock, with an additional increase on the first trading day in January of each calendar year during the term of the plan by an amount equal to 4.0% of the total number of shares of Common Stock issued and outstanding on December 31 of the immediately preceding calendar year. In June 2015, the 2014 Plan was amended to increase the replenishment percentage to 5.0% of outstanding common shares outstanding on December 31 of the immediately preceding calendar year and to allow the reissuance thereunder of awards and grants that expire or are canceled, terminated, forfeited, or fail to vest under the 2007 Plan and 2010 Plan, as amended. Stock options for new hires granted under this plan generally vest 25% after 12 months, followed by ratable vesting over the remaining 36-month term and expire 10 years from the grant date. Annual promotional and incentive-related grants generally vest ratably over a period of 48 months. As of December 31, 2020, there were 9,262,744 stock options outstanding, 630,755 restricted stock awards outstanding, and 2,189,910 shares of common stock reserved for future issuance under the 2014 Plan.
Inducement Grants
During 2014 and 2015, the Company granted 470,272 and 450,700 stock options, respectively, as inducement material to individuals entering into employment with the Company (“Inducement Grants”). The Inducement Grants were approved by the Compensation Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors and were awarded in accordance with Nasdaq Listing Rule 5635(c)(4) and outside of the 2014 Plan. As such, any shares underlying the Inducement Grants are not, upon forfeiture, cancellation, or expiration, returned to a pool of shares reserved for future issuance. As of December 31, 2020, there were 52,400 Inducement Grants that remained outstanding.
2016 Inducement Plan
On March 4, 2016, the Board of Directors adopted the 2016 Plan pursuant to which the Company may grant options to purchase common shares as an inducement to individuals to join the Company. The 2016 Plan, as adopted, allowed the Company to deliver up to 250,000 shares (the “Share Limit”) of its common stock to eligible persons, as defined. The Share Limit is subject to adjustment as contemplated by the provisions of the 2014 Plan. In February and May 2017, the Share Limit was adjusted to increase the pool of issuable options by 125,000 and 200,000 underlying shares, respectively. On December 11, 2018, the Board of Directors approved a resolution to further increase the Share Limit under the 2016 Plan by 2,700,000 to 3,275,000 underlying shares. In December 2019, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized an additional 2,900,000 shares for issuance under the 2016 Plan. As of December 31, 2020, there were 4,383,484 stock options outstanding, 424,650 restricted stock awards outstanding, and 895,114 shares of common stock reserved for future issuance under the 2016 Plan.
Stock-based compensation expense
The Company has classified stock-based compensation expense in its consolidated statements of operations as follows:
YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31,
2020 2019 2018
Research and development
$ 20,157 $ 8,413 $ 3,062
General and administrative
18,754 10,409 4,826
Total
$ 38,911 $ 18,822 $ 7,888
Stock options
Expected volatility for the Company’s common stock was determined based on an average of the historical volatility of a peer group of similar companies due to limited historical volatility of the Company’s own common stock. The Company also has limited stock option exercise information, and as such, the expected term of stock options granted was calculated in most cases using the simplified method, which represents the average of the contractual term of the stock option and the weighted-average vesting period of the stock option. The assumed dividend yield is based upon the Company’s expectation of not paying dividends in the foreseeable future. The risk-free rate for periods within the expected life of the stock option is based upon the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant.
The assumptions used in the Black-Scholes option-pricing model for all stock options granted during each period presented are as follows:
YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31,
2020 2019 2018
Common stock price
$15.61 - $26.62
$10.31 - $26.48
$9.14 - $15.74
Expected option term (in years)
5.50 - 6.08
5.28 - 6.08
5.50 - 6.25
Expected volatility
78.3% - 80.5%
78.3% - 80.8%
75.9% - 78.3%
Risk-free interest rate
-% - 1.7%
1.4% - 2.6%
2.3% - 3.0%
Expected dividend yield
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
The table below summarizes the activity for stock options granted under the Company’s equity incentive plans:
NUMBER
OF
OPTIONS WEIGHTED-
AVERAGE
EXERCISE
PRICE WEIGHTED-
AVERAGE
REMAINING
CONTRACTUAL
TERM (YEARS) AGGREGATE INTRINSIC VALUE
OUTSTANDING - January 1, 2020 12,467,150 $11.38
Granted 4,376,125 $21.69
Exercised (1,996,861) $9.44
Forfeited/Canceled (510,169) $15.05
Expired (12,556) $21.14
OUTSTANDING - December 31, 2020 14,323,689 $14.66 7.4 $ 108,532
EXERCISABLE - December 31, 2020 7,317,376 $12.13 6.2 $ 72,968
VESTED AND EXPECTED TO VEST - December 31, 2020 13,723,693 $14.49 7.4 $ 106,213
The weighted-average grant date fair value of stock options granted during the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018 was $14.83, $9.11, and $7.64 per share, respectively. As of December 31, 2020, there was $76.2 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested employee stock options which are expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.75 years. The intrinsic value of stock options exercised was $25.7 million, $15.2 million, and $2.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018, respectively.
The Company does not currently hold any treasury shares. Upon stock option exercise, the Company issues new shares and delivers them to the participant.
Restricted common stock
The table below summarizes the activity for restricted stock units granted under the Company’s equity incentive plans:
UNITS WEIGHTED-
AVERAGE
GRANT DATE FAIR VALUE
NONVESTED RESTRICTED STOCK UNITS - January 1, 2020 - $0.00
Granted 1,096,780 $21.72
Vested - $0.00
Forfeited (41,375) $22.11
NONVESTED RESTRICTED STOCK UNITS - December 31, 2020 1,055,405 $21.70
As of December 31, 2020, there was $17.9 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested share-based compensation arrangements granted under the 2014 Plan. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 3.17 years.
Employee stock purchase plan
On January 28, 2014, the Company’s stockholders approved the 2014 ESPP, which authorized the issuance of up to 1,000,000 shares of common stock thereunder. The 2014 ESPP provides for an automatic reserve increase equivalent to the lesser of 1% of the total number of shares of common stock issued and outstanding on December 31 of the immediately preceding calendar year and 1,000,000 shares of common stock, unless otherwise determined by the Company’s Board of Directors. As of December 31, 2020, there were 3,505,629 shares of common stock authorized and 3,006,226 shares of common stock available for issuance under the 2014 ESPP.
Eligible employees may purchase shares of the Company’s common stock through regular payroll deductions up to 15% of their eligible compensation. Under the terms of the offering under the 2014 ESPP, the number of shares purchased by an individual participant in the plan may not exceed 10,000 shares in any one purchase period. In addition, the fair market value of shares purchased by an individual participant in the plan may not exceed $25,000 if the contribution period is within any one calendar year. Participants are allowed to terminate their participation in the ESPP at any time during the purchase period prior to the purchase of the shares. The offering periods have a 24-month term, which consists of four purchase periods, each of which is six months in duration. New offering periods commence on the first day of January and July each year and end on the last business day of the immediately following June or December, respectively.
The per-share purchase price at the end of each offering period is equal to the lesser of 85% of the fair market value of the common stock on the grant date of the offering period to which the purchase period relates or 85% of the fair market value of the common stock on the purchase date of the applicable purchase period. In the event that the fair value of the common stock on any purchase date during an offering period is lower than the fair market value of the common stock on the grant date of that offering period, that offering period will terminate on such purchase date, and each participant in such terminated offering period will be automatically enrolled in the new offering period that commences on the first business day of the next offering period that immediately follows such purchase date.
Shares issued under the 2014 ESPP are considered compensatory. Accordingly, the Company is required to measure the fair value of the stock purchase rights granted and record compensation expense for share purchase rights granted under the 2014 ESPP. The fair values of the stock purchase rights are estimated using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model, which relies on a number of key assumptions in calculating the estimates of fair value. Stock-based compensation expense related to stock purchase rights under the 2014 ESPP was $1.0 million, $0.7 million, and $0.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018, respectively.
During the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018, the Company issued 113,792, 122,999, and 118,239 shares of common stock under the 2014 ESPP, respectively. The weighted-average purchase prices of shares issued under the 2014 ESPP were $13.51, $6.97, and $2.61 per share for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018, respectively.
11. 401(K) PROFIT SHARING PLAN AND TRUST
The Company has a 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan and Trust (“401(k) Plan”), which is a retirement plan in which substantially all employees are eligible to participate. Eligible employees may elect to contribute up to the maximum limits, as set by the Internal Revenue Service, of their eligible compensation. Under the terms of the 401(k) Plan, employees may elect to make pre-tax and Roth contributions through payroll deductions within statutory and plan limits. The Company makes matching contributions of 300% of eligible employee salary deferrals that do not exceed 2% of the eligible participant’s compensation. All matching contributions vest immediately. Each year, the Company may also make a discretionary profit-sharing contribution to the plan. Such contributions to the Plan are allocated among eligible participants in the proportion of their salaries to the total salaries of all participants.
Expense recognized by the Company for matching contributions made to the 401(k) Plan was $2.3 million, $1.2 million, and $0.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018, respectively. There were no discretionary profit-sharing contributions made by the Company during the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, or 2018.
12. INCOME TAXES
The Company has no current and no deferred income tax expense for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019. The Company did not record a federal income tax provision or benefit for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, or 2018.
The reconciliation between income taxes computed at the federal statutory income tax rate and the provision for (benefit from) income taxes is as follows:
YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31,
2020 2019 2018
Federal statutory rate
21.0 % 21.0 % 21.0 %
Effect of:
Foreign rate differential - % (5.9) % (9.5) %
Tax credits 19.6 % - % - %
Net operating loss limitation 1.9 % 17.0 % (23.0) %
Change in valuation allowance (39.6) % (29.7) % 10.6 %
Foreign income/GILTI (a)
- % (8.0) % - %
Stock-based compensation expense (2.9) % 1.7 % 0.4 %
Other - % 3.9 % 0.5 %
Total
- % - % - %
(a) GILTI represents Global Intangible Low-Tax Income
The components of the Company’s deferred tax assets and liabilities are as follows:
DECEMBER 31,
2020 2019
Deferred tax assets:
Net operating loss carryforwards $ 84,653 $ 58,319
Capitalized research and development costs 318 415
Research and development credit carryforwards 30,580 7,386
Lease liability 15,107 6,905
Stock-based compensation expense 14,911 11,751
Depreciation expense and other costs 1,346 408
Derivative liability 1,724 -
Deferred tax assets 148,639 85,184
Deferred tax liabilities:
Right-of-use assets (14,848) (6,833)
Intangible assets (2,679) (1,939)
Deferred revenue (1,688) (492)
Deferred tax liabilities (19,215) (9,264)
Valuation allowance (129,424) (75,920)
Net deferred tax assets
$ - $ -
As a result of certain changes in applicable Cayman Islands law, certain changes in U.S. tax law, and related business considerations, the Company undertook certain restructuring transactions in 2019 that resulted in the liquidation of Dicerna Cayman, which was a wholly owned subsidiary of Dicerna Pharmaceuticals, Inc. that previously held intellectual property rights. That liquidation was accomplished initially via an election to treat Dicerna Cayman as a disregarded entity separate from Dicerna Pharmaceuticals, Inc. for U.S. federal income tax purposes, effective July 1, 2019; thereafter, Dicerna Cayman was dissolved under applicable Cayman Islands law. As a result of these transactions, all the pre-liquidation assets and liabilities of Dicerna Cayman, including certain intellectual property rights, are now assets and liabilities of Dicerna Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Management has evaluated the positive and negative evidence bearing upon the realizability of the Company’s net deferred tax assets and has determined that it is more likely than not that the Company will not recognize the benefits of the net deferred tax assets. As a result, the Company has recorded a full valuation allowance at December 31, 2020 and 2019.
Realization of the future tax benefits is dependent on many factors, including the Company’s ability to generate taxable income within the net operating loss carryforward period. Under the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code (“IRC”), certain substantial changes in the Company’s ownership, including a sale of the Company or significant changes in ownership due to sales of equity, may have limited, or may limit in the future, the amount of net operating loss carryforwards which could be used annually to offset future taxable income.
As of December 31, 2020, the Company had approximately $279.6 million of federal net operating losses, of which $125.1 million is subject to the IRC 382 limitation. None of these IRC 382 limited net operating losses are expected to expire before utilization. As of December 31, 2020, the Company had $324.0 million of state net operating loss carryforwards. If not utilized, the federal and state net operating loss carryforwards expire starting in 2029 and 2030, respectively. Additionally, as of December 31, 2020, the Company had $29.9 million of federal and $6.1 million of Massachusetts tax credits that expire starting in 2028 and 2023, respectively.
As of December 31, 2020 and 2019, the Company had $5.5 million and $3.0 million of unrecognized tax benefits, respectively, all of which would affect income tax expense if recognized, before consideration of the Company’s valuation allowance. The Company does not expect the unrecognized tax benefits to change significantly over the next 12 months. The Company recognizes both interest and penalties associated with uncertain tax positions as a component of income tax expense. As of December 31, 2020 and 2019, the Company had no accrued penalties or provisions for interest.
A reconciliation of the gross unrecognized tax benefits are as follows:
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
2020 2019
Unrecognized tax benefits at the beginning of the period $ 3,040 $ 1,631
Increases for current tax positions 2,847 1,426
Decreases for current tax positions - -
Increases for previous tax positions 1,350 -
Decreases for previous tax positions (1,769) (17)
Unrecognized tax benefits at the end of the period $ 5,468 $ 3,040
The Company files income tax returns in the United States, the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Colorado, Maryland, North Carolina, New York, and New Jersey. The tax years 2008 through 2019 remain open to examination by these jurisdictions, as carryforward attributes generated in past years may be adjusted in a future period. The Company is not currently under examination by the Internal Revenue Service or any other jurisdiction for these years. The Company has not recorded any interest or penalties for unrecognized tax benefits since its inception.
13. LEASES
75 Hayden Avenue
On January 14, 2020, the Company entered into a non-cancelable real property lease agreement for 61,282 square feet of laboratory and office space at 75 Hayden Avenue in Lexington, Massachusetts. The original term commenced during the fourth quarter of 2020 and is for 125 months with options to extend for two additional successive periods of five years thereafter. Payments for the extensions are not included in measurement of the ROU asset and lease liability, as it is not reasonably certain that the Company will exercise its options to extend the lease term. The aggregate total fixed rent for the original lease is approximately $41.8 million with the annual fixed rental payments escalating from $3.6 million to $4.8 million during the original term. In conjunction with the agreement, the Company was required to establish a $1.5 million letter of credit that has been secured by money market investments and presented as restricted cash equivalents.
The interest rate implicit in the lease agreement is not readily determinable, and as such, the Company utilizes its incremental borrowing rate to calculate the lease liability, which is the rate incurred to borrow, on a collateralized basis for a similar term, an amount equal to the lease payments in a similar economic environment at the time the asset is made available to the Company.
On July 1, 2020, the Company entered into an amendment (the “75 Hayden Amendment”) to the 75 Hayden Avenue lease. The 75 Hayden Amendment expands the square footage leased under the 75 Hayden Avenue lease to contain a total of 91,728 rentable square feet. The 75 Hayden Amendment increased monthly base rent by an average of $0.2 million per month. Consistent with the terms of the original 75 Hayden Avenue lease, throughout the term of the amended 75 Hayden Avenue lease, the Company is responsible for paying certain variable costs and expenses, including insurance costs and a proportionate share of applicable taxes and operating expenses for the premises. In conjunction with the 75 Hayden Amendment, the Company was required to establish an additional $0.8 million letter of credit that has been secured by money market investments and presented as restricted cash equivalents.
33 Hayden Avenue
On January 2, 2019, Dicerna executed a lease for laboratory and office space in Lexington, Massachusetts (the “Lexington Lease”) that commenced for accounting purposes on November 3, 2019. The term of the Lexington Lease is seven years with approximately $30.1 million in fixed payments and consideration for the first partial calendar month. The Company has the option to extend the lease term at a prevailing market rate as of the extension date, which is seven years after the Lexington Lease commencement date. Payments for the extension is not included in measurement of the ROU asset and lease liability, as it is not reasonably certain that the Company will exercise its option to extend the lease term. As part of the Company’s lease agreement, the Company is required to establish a $2.8 million letter of credit, secured by money market investments, which is presented as restricted cash equivalents at December 31, 2020.
Colorado Leases
On August 26, 2019, the Company entered into a lease agreement for 15,781 square feet of office space in Boulder, Colorado (the “Original Colorado Lease”). The term of the Original Colorado Lease commenced for accounting purposes on December 4, 2020. The term of the Original Colorado Lease ends September 30, 2027 with approximately $3.0 million in aggregate fixed payments over the term of the lease arrangement. The Boulder Lease also provides the option to extend the term for up to two additional periods of 60 months each. Payments for the extensions are not included in measurement of the ROU asset and lease liability, as it is not reasonably certain that the Company will exercise its options to extend the lease term. As part of the agreement for the Boulder Lease, the Company was required to establish a $0.4 million letter of credit, secured by money market investments, which is presented as restricted cash equivalents at December 31, 2020 and 2019.
On February 4, 2020, the Company entered into an amendment to a real property lease agreement for its office location in Boulder, Colorado (“the First Colorado Lease Amendment”). The First Colorado Lease Amendment provided for an additional 6,985 square feet of office space within the same building. The term of the lease for the additional space provided for under the First Colorado Lease Amendment commenced on February 5, 2020. The term of the First Colorado Lease Amendment ends September 30, 2027 with approximately $1.5 million in aggregate fixed payments over the term of the lease arrangement. The Boulder Lease also provides the option to extend the term for up to two additional periods of 60 months each. As part of the agreement for the First Colorado Lease Amendment, the Company was required to establish a $0.2 million letter of credit, secured by money market investments, which is presented as restricted cash equivalents at December 31, 2020.
On July 8, 2020, the Company entered into a second amendment (the “Second Colorado Lease Amendment”) to the lease agreement dated August 26, 2019 for office space in Boulder, Colorado. The Second Colorado Lease Amendment provided the Company with permission to operate a designated area of the Original Colorado Premises as biotechnology laboratory space.
Payments due under the amended Colorado leases include fixed and variable payments. Variable payments relate to the Company’s share of the lessor’s operating costs associated with the underlying assets and are recognized when the event on which those payments are assessed occurs. The term for each of the lease components under the Amended Colorado Lease will end on September 30, 2027. The Company has the option to extend the term for two additional successive periods of five years thereafter.
Cambridge Leases
On July 11, 2014, the Company executed a noncancelable operating lease for office and laboratory space in Cambridge, Massachusetts (the “First Cambridge Lease”). The lease agreement, the term of which commenced on December 1, 2014, obligated the Company to make minimum payments totaling $9.6 million over a six-year lease term ending November 30, 2020. The Company had the option to extend the lease term for one additional five-year period, but did not extend and the lease ended. Rent expense was recorded on a straight-line basis. As part of the Company’s lease agreement, the Company established a $0.7 million letter of credit, secured by a money market investment, the balance of which is presented as restricted cash equivalents at December 31, 2020 and 2019. The Company also leases a small office in Cambridge, Massachusetts which has a 30-month term without a renewal option (the “Second Cambridge Lease” and together with the First Cambridge Lease, the “Cambridge Leases”).
Payments due under each lease agreement include fixed and variable payments. Variable payments relate to the Company’s share of the lessors’ operating costs associated with the underlying assets and are recognized when the event on which those payments are assessed occurs. None of the Company’s operating leases contain residual value guarantees.
The interest rate implicit in lease agreements is typically not readily determinable, and as such, the Company utilizes the incremental borrowing rate to calculate lease liabilities, which is the rate incurred to borrow, on a collateralized basis over a similar term, an amount equal to the lease payments in a similar economic environment. ROU assets from finance leases are recorded within property and equipment on the consolidated balance sheets.
Future lease payments for noncancelable leases as of December 31, 2020 are as follows:
OPERATING LEASES (1)
FINANCE
LEASES
2021 $ 7,351 $ 64
2022 8,480 60
2023 8,735 60
2024 8,997 56
2025 9,267 2
Thereafter 28,918 -
Total undiscounted lease payments 71,748 242
Less: imputed interest expense (19,770) (37)
Total lease liabilities $ 51,978 $ 205
__________________________
(1) Excluded from the table above are a portion of our lease payments associated with our newest lease in Lexington, Massachusetts, as the space leased under the amendment has not commenced for accounting purposes as of December 31, 2020. Under generally accepted accounting principles, the commencement date is the date on which the asset is made available to the Company by the lessor.
The components of lease cost in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations are as follows:
YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31,
2020 2019 2018
Operating leases
Fixed lease cost $ 8,095 $ 2,747 $ 1,634
Variable lease cost 3,064 1,915 -
Total operating lease cost $ 11,159 $ 4,662 $ 1,634
Finance lease
Amortization expense $ 48 $ 6 $ -
Interest expense 20 3 -
Total finance lease cost $ 68 $ 9 $ -
Amounts reported in the consolidated balance sheet for leases in which the Company is the lessee as of December 31, 2020 were as follows:
OPERATING LEASES FINANCE
LEASES
Lease ROU assets $ 60,843 $ 187
Lease liabilities $ 51,978 205
Weighted-average remaining lease term 8.37 3.94
Weighted-average discount rate 8.00 % 9.00 %
Other information related to the Company’s leases is as follows:
YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31,
2020 2019 2018
Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities
Operating cash flows from operating leases $ 10,420 $ 8,966 $ 1,634
Financing cash flows from finance leases $ 45 $ - $ -
Right-of-use assets obtained in exchange for lease liabilities
Operating leases $ 32,368 $ 32,412 $ -
Finance leases $ 48 $ 193 $ -
14. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
On June 10, 2015, Alnylam filed a complaint against the Company in the Superior Court of Middlesex County, Massachusetts. The complaint alleged misappropriation of confidential, proprietary, and trade secret information, as well as other related claims, in connection with the Company’s hiring of a number of former employees of Merck & Co., Inc. (“Merck”) and its discussions with Merck regarding the acquisition of its subsidiary, Sirna Therapeutics, Inc., which was subsequently acquired by Alnylam.
On April 18, 2018, the Company and Alnylam entered into the Settlement Agreement, resolving all ongoing litigation between the Company and Alnylam. Pursuant to the terms of the Settlement Agreement, the Company agreed to make the following payments to Alnylam: (i) a $2.0 million upfront payment in cash, which the Company made in May 2018; (ii) an additional $13.0 million in cash to be paid as 10% of any upfront or first year cash consideration that the Company receives pursuant to future collaborations related to Ga1NAc-conjugated RNAi research and development (excluding any amounts received or to be received by the Company from its existing collaboration with BI), provided that the $13.0 million must be paid by no later than April 28, 2022; and (iii) issuance of shares of the Company’s common stock pursuant to the Alnylam Share Issuance Agreement.
Under the Settlement Agreement, for periods ranging from 18 months up to four years, the Company will be restricted in its development and other activities relating to oligonucleotide-based therapeutics directed toward a defined set of eight Alnylam targets (the “Oligo Restrictions”). The Oligo Restrictions pertain to targets where Dicerna does not have, or does not currently intend to have, a therapeutic program, or are expected to be consistent with Dicerna’s execution on programs in the normal course of business. The Settlement Agreement did not include any admission of liability or wrongdoing by either party or any licenses to any intellectual property from either party.
On April 20, 2018, the Company and Alnylam entered into the Alnylam Share Issuance Agreement, pursuant to which the Company agreed to issue to Alnylam 983,208 shares in satisfaction of the Company’s obligation under the Settlement Agreement to deliver shares to Alnylam. The 983,208 shares issued pursuant to the Alnylam Share Issuance Agreement was recorded at fair market value of $10.3 million based on the Company’s closing share price on April 18, 2018, the date the Settlement Agreement was executed. The Company did not assign any value to the Oligo Restrictions as the Company did not incur additional losses or give up any value as a result of the restrictions.
In May 2018, the Company recorded the cash obligation of $13.0 million as a liability discounted to the estimated present value of $8.7 million at an effective interest rate of 10%. The Company applied the effective interest method, as the present value is accreted through maturity. In October 2018, the Company entered into collaboration agreements with Alexion and Lilly, under which the Company was entitled to upfront cash consideration of $22.0 million and $100.0 million, respectively (see Note 8). Accordingly, the Company revised its estimate of the present value of the litigation settlement payable from $8.7 million to $13.0 million based on the expected timing of the remaining payments. The impact of revising the expected timing of repayment was recorded as a $3.7 million charge to litigation expense in the consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2018.
In connection with the execution of the Alexion Collaboration Agreement and the related receipt of the non-refundable upfront payment of $22.0 million and proceeds of $15.0 million from the Alexion Share Issuance Agreement in October 2018, the Company determined that $2.5 million became payable to Alnylam under the terms of the Settlement Agreement. The Company issued a payment to Alnylam of $2.5 million in November 2018 for the amount of the litigation settlement payable due in connection with the cash consideration received from Alexion during 2018.
At December 31, 2018, the outstanding balance of the litigation settlement payable was $10.5 million. The Company paid the remaining outstanding balance of litigation settlement payable in full on January 22, 2019 upon receipt of the upfront cash payment associated with the Lilly Collaboration Agreement. During the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company recognized interest expense of $0.6 million on the outstanding balance of the litigation settlement payable during the year.
Total litigation expense was $29.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2018, all of which related to the litigation and settlement agreement with Alnylam. The litigation expense for the year ended December 31, 2018 includes $24.7 million related to the Settlement Agreement.
Legal proceedings
From time to time, the Company may be subject to various claims and legal proceedings in the ordinary course of business. If the potential loss from any claim, asserted or unasserted, or legal proceeding is considered probable and the amount is reasonably estimable, the Company will accrue a liability for the estimated loss. There were no contingent liabilities recorded as of December 31, 2020 or 2019.

---

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.

---

ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our periodic and current reports that we file under the Exchange Act, with the SEC is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our chief executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
As of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including the chief executive officer and the chief financial officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-15. Based upon, and as of the date of, this evaluation, our chief executive officer and our chief financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective. Accordingly, management believes that the financial statements included in this report fairly present in all material respects our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented.
Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) of the Exchange Act). Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2020 based on the guidelines established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework 2013 issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Our internal control over financial reporting includes policies and procedures that provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external reporting purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
Based on that evaluation, management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2020.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
The Company’s financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K have been audited by Deloitte & Touche LLP, independent registered public accounting firm, as indicated in the following report. Deloitte & Touche LLP has also provided an attestation report on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the stockholders and the Board of Directors of Dicerna Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Opinion on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of Dicerna Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2020, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2020, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by COSO.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2020, of the Company and our report dated February 25, 2021, expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements.
Basis for Opinion
The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
February 25, 2021
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
We continuously seek to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of our internal controls. This results in refinements to processes throughout the Company. There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting during the year ended December 31, 2020, which was identified in connection with our management’s evaluation required by Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f), that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Inherent Limitations on the Effectiveness of Controls
Our management, including the chief executive officer and chief financial officer, does not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures or our internal control over financial reporting will prevent all error and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within a company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision making can be faulty and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people or by management override of the control. The design of any system of controls also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. Over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.

---

ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION
None.
PART III

---

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
The information required by this item and not set forth below will be set forth in the definitive proxy statement (the “Proxy Statement”) for our 2021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with the SEC pursuant to Regulation 14A not later than 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K and is incorporated herein by reference.
Information regarding our audit committee financial expert will be set forth in the Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.
We have adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics applicable to all employees, including the principal executive officer, principal financial officer, and principal accounting officer, or persons performing similar functions. The Code of Business Conduct and Ethics is posted on our website at www.dicerna.com. Amendments to, and waivers from, the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that apply to any of these officers, or persons performing similar functions, and that relate to any element of the code of ethics definition enumerated in Item 406(b) of Regulation S-K will be disclosed at the website address provided above and, to the extent required by applicable regulations, on a Current Report on Form 8-K.

---

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The information required by this item will be set forth in the Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.

---

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
The information required by this item will be set forth in the Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.

---

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
The information required by this item will be set forth in the Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.

---

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
The information required by this item will be set forth in the Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.
PART IV

---

ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
(1) Consolidated Financial Statements:
The following consolidated financial statements are filed as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K under Item 8 - “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.”
Page
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Consolidated Balance Sheets
Consolidated Statements of Operations
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(2) Financial Statement Schedules.
All schedules are omitted because they are not applicable, not required, or because the required information is included in the consolidated financial statements or notes thereto.
(3) Exhibits.
EXHIBIT INDEX
Incorporated by Reference
Exhibit
Number Description of
Documents Form File Number Exhibit Filing Date
3.1 Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company.
8-K 001-36281 3.1 February 5, 2014
3.2 Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Company.
8-K 001-36281 3.2 February 5, 2014
3.3 Certificate of Designation of Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock.
8-K 001-36281 3.1 March 30, 2017
3.4 Certificate of Elimination of the Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock, dated as of December 29, 2017.
8-K 001-36281 3.1 December 29, 2017
4.1 Description of Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
10-K 001-36281 4.1 February 28, 2020
4.2 Specimen Common Stock Certificate.
S-1 333-193150 4.1 January 28, 2014
4.2A Form of Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock Certificate.
8-K 001-36281 4.1 March 30, 2017
4.3 Form of Warrant to Purchase Common Stock.
S-1 333-193150 4.2 December 31, 2013
4.4 Form of Warrant to Purchase Preferred Stock.
S-1 333-193150 4.3 December 31, 2013
4.5 Form of Amended and Restated Registration Rights Agreement.
8-K 001-36281 10.2 March 30, 2017
4.5A Form of First Amendment to Registration Rights Agreement.
8-K 001-36281 10.1 December 18, 2017
10.1+ 2007 Employee, Director and Consultant Stock Plan, as amended (the “2007 Plan”).
S-1 333-193150 10.1 December 31, 2013
10.2+ Form of Restricted Stock Agreement under the 2007 Plan.
S-1 333-193150 10.2 December 31, 2013
10.3+ Form of Incentive Stock Option Agreement under the 2007 Plan.
S-1 333-193150 10.3 December 31, 2013
10.4+ Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement under the 2007 Plan.
S-1 333-193150 10.4 December 31, 2013
10.5+ 2010 Employee, Director and Consultant Equity Incentive Plan, as amended (the “2010 Plan”).
S-1 333-193150 10.5 December 31, 2013
10.6+ Form of Stock Option Grant Notice and Stock Option Agreement under the 2010 Plan.
S-1 333-193150 10.6 December 31, 2013
10.7+ Form of Restricted Stock Agreement under the 2010 Plan.
S-1 333-193150 10.7 December 31, 2013
10.8+ 2014 Employee Stock Purchase Plan.
S-1 333-193150 10.9 January 28, 2014
10.9+ Form of Indemnification Agreement by and between the Company and each of its directors.
S-1 333-193150 10.10 January 28, 2014
10.12 Lease agreement dated as of July 11, 2014, by and between the Company and King 87 CPD LLC.
10-Q 001-36281 10.5 November 6, 2014
10.14 Sales Agreement, dated as of March 12, 2015, between the Registrant and Cowen and Company, LLC.
S-3 333-202687 1.2 March 12, 2015
10.15+ Amended and Restated 2014 Performance Incentive Plan, as amended and restated on May 7, 2019.
10-Q 001-36281 10.2 May 10, 2019
10.16+ Form of Incentive Stock Option Agreement under the Amended and Restated 2014 Performance Incentive Plan.
10-K 001-36281 10.31 March 10, 2016
10.17+ Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement under the Amended and Restated 2014 Performance Incentive Plan.
10-K 001-36281 10.32 March 10, 2016
Incorporated by Reference
Exhibit
Number Description of
Documents Form File Number Exhibit Filing Date
10.18+ Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement under the Amended and Restated 2014 Performance Incentive Plan.
10-Q 001-36281 10.3 November 5, 2020
10.19+ Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement under the Amended and Restated 2016 Inducement Plan.
10-Q 001-36281 10.4 November 5, 2020
10.21+ Offer Letter dated as of January 14, 2016 by and between the Company and John “Jack” Green.
10-K 001-36281 10.34 March 10, 2016
10.22+ Dicerna Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Amended and Restated 2016 Inducement Plan.
S-8 333-223648 4.3 March 14, 2018
10.23+ Form of Dicerna Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Non-Qualified Inducement Stock Option Agreement.
S-8 333-210071 4.2 March 10, 2016
10.24+ Form of Non-Plan Inducement Stock Option Agreement.
S-8 333-210071 4.4 March 10, 2016
10.25+ Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated as of July 8, 2016 by and between the Company and Douglas M. Fambrough, III.
10-Q 001-36281 10.1 November 7, 2016
10.26+ Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated as of July 8, 2016 by and between the Company and Bob. D. Brown.
10-Q 001-36281 10.2 November 7, 2016
10.27+ Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated as of July 6, 2016 by and between the Company and James B. Weissman.
10-Q 001-36281 10.3 November 7, 2016
10.28+ Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated as of November 4, 2016 by and between the Company and John B. Green.
10-Q 001-36281 10.4 November 7, 2016
10.29+ Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated as of February 25, 2020 by and between the Company and John B. Green.
10-K 001-36281 10.29 February 28, 2020
10.30+ Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated as of February 24, 2020 by and between the Company and James B. Weissman.
10-K 001-36281 10.30 February 28, 2020
10.31+ Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated as of February 21, 2020 by and between the Company and Bob. D. Brown.
10-K 001-36281 10.31 February 28, 2020
10.32+ Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated as of February 21, 2020 by and between the Company and Douglas M. Fambrough, III.
10-K 001-36281 10.32 February 28, 2020
10.33+ Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated as of February 26, 2020 by and between the Company and Ralf Rosskamp.
10-K 001-36281 10.33 February 28, 2020
10.34 Form of Letter Agreement by and between the Company and Adam Koppel.
8-K 001-36281 10.3 March 30, 2017
10.35 Form of Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement by and among the Company and seven institutional investors led by funds advised by Bain Capital Life Sciences L.P.
8-K 001-36281 10.1 March 30, 2017
10.36+ Employment Agreement, dated May 18, 2017, by and between the Company and Ralf Rosskamp.
10-Q 001-36281 10.3 August 10, 2017
10.37+ Transition Agreement dated as of April 16, 2020, by and between the Company and Ralf Rosskamp.
10-Q 001-36281 10.1 May 7, 2020
10.38 Collaborative Research and License Agreement, dated October 27, 2017, by and between the Company and Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH.
10-K 001-36281 10.30 March 8, 2018
10.39 Letter Agreement entered into on December 13, 2017 by and between the Company and the holders of its redeemable convertible preferred stock.
8-K 001-36281 10.1 December 14, 2017
10.40† Confidential Settlement Agreement and General Release, dated April 18, 2018, between the Company and Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
10-Q 001-36281 10.1 August 8, 2018
10.41 Share Issuance Agreement, dated April 20, 2018, between the Company and Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
10-Q 001-36281 10.2 August 8, 2018
10.42† Collaborative Research and License Agreement, dated October 22, 2018, by and between the Company and Alexion Pharma Holding Unlimited Company.
10-K 001-36281 10.34 March 13, 2019
10.43 Alexion Share Issuance Agreement, dated October 22, 2018, by and between the Company and Alexion Pharma Holding Unlimited Company.
10-K 001-36281 10.35 March 13, 2019
10.44† Collaboration and License Agreement, dated October 25, 2018, by and between the Company and Eli Lilly and Company.
10-K 001-36281 10.36 March 13, 2019
10.45 Lilly Share Issuance Agreement, dated October 25, 2018, by and between the Company and Eli Lilly and Company.
10-K 001-36281 10.37 March 13, 2019
10.46† Additional Target Agreement, dated December 31, 2018, by and between the Company and Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH.
10-K 001-36281 10.38 March 13, 2019
10.47†† Collaboration and License Agreement, dated October 30, 2019, by and between the Company, F. Hoffman-La Roche Ltd and Hoffman-La Roche Inc.
10-K 001-36281 10.46 February 28, 2020
10.48 First Amendment to Collaboration and License Agreement by and between the Company and F. Hoffman-La Roche Inc., dated as of May 22, 2020.
10-Q 001-36281 10.4 August 6, 2020
10.49 Second Amendment to Collaboration and License Agreement, by and between the Company and F. Hoffman-La Roche Inc., dated as of June 22, 2020.
10-Q 001-36281 10.5 August 6, 2020
10.50†† Collaboration and License Agreement, dated November 15, 2019, by and between the Company and Novo Nordisk A/S.
10-K 001-36281 10.47 February 28, 2020
10.51 Share Issuance Agreement, dated November 15, 2019, by and between the Company and Novo Nordisk A/S.
10-K 001-36281 10.48 February 28, 2020
Incorporated by Reference
Exhibit
Number Description of
Documents Form File Number Exhibit Filing Date
10.52 Lease Agreement between the Company and Hayden Office Trust, dated as of January 2, 2019.
10-Q 001-36281 10.1 May 10, 2019
10.53 First Amendment to Lease Agreement between the Company and Hayden Office Trust, dated as of March 6, 2019.
10-Q 001-36281 10.1.1 May 10, 2019
10.54 Amendment to Indenture of Lease by and between the Company and HCP/King 75 Hayden LLC, dated as of July 1, 2020.
10-Q 001-36281 10.6 August 6, 2020
10.55 Lease Agreement between the Company and Western Office Portfolio Property Owner LLC, dated as of August 26, 2019.
10-Q 001-36281 10.1 November 11, 2019
10.56 First Amendment to Lease Agreement between the Company and Western Office Portfolio Property Owner LLC, dated as of February 4, 2020.
10-K 001-36281 10.52 February 28, 2020
10.57 Second Amendment to Lease Agreement between the Company and Western Office Portfolio Property Owner LLC, dated as of July 8, 2020.
10-Q 001-36281 10.7 August 6, 2020
10.58 Lease Agreement between the Company and HCP/King 75 Hayden LLC, dated as of January 14, 2020.
10-K 001-36281 10.53 February 28, 2020
10.59+ Employment Agreement dated as of June 19, 2019, by and between the Company and Robert Ciappenelli.
10-K 001-36281 10.54 February 28, 2020
10.60+ Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated as of February 21, 2020, by and between the Company and Robert Ciappenelli.
10-K 001-36281 10.55 February 28, 2020
10.61+ Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated as of February 21, 2020, by and between the Company and Regina Paglia.
10-Q 001-36281 10.1 August 6, 2020
10.62+ Transition Agreement dated as of February 27, 2020, by and between the Company and John B. Green.
10-K 001-36281 10.56 February 28, 2020
10.63 Collaboration and Cross License Agreement dated as of April 3, 2020, by and between the Company and Alnylam.
10-Q 001-36281 10.2 August 6, 2020
10.64 Patent Cross-License Agreement dated as of April 3, 2020, by and between the Company and Alnylam.
10-Q 001-36281 10.3 August 6, 2020
10.65+ Employment Agreement dated as of May 26, 2020, by and between the Company and Douglas Pagán.
8-K 001-36281 10.1 May 7, 2020
10.66+ Dicerna Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Non-Employee Director Compensation Policy.
8-K 001-36281 99.1 June 17, 2020
10.67+ Employment Agreement dated as of July 23, 2020, by and between the Company and Shreeram Aradhye.
10-Q 001-36281 10.1 November 5, 2020
10.68+ Employment Agreement dated as of September 16, 2020, by and between the Company and Ling Zeng.
10-Q 001-36281 10.2 November 5, 2020
21.1* Subsidiaries of the Company.
23.1* Consent of Independent Registered Accounting Firm.
24 Power of Attorney (reference is made to the signature page).
31.1* Certification of the Company’s principal executive officer required by Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a).
31.2* Certification of the Company’s principal financial officer required by Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a).
32.1** Section 1350 Certifications.
101.INS* XBRL Report Instance Document
101.SCH* XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CAL* XBRL Taxonomy Calculation Linkbase Document
101.LAB* XBRL Taxonomy Label Linkbase Document
101.PRE* XBRL Taxonomy Presentation Linkbase Document
101.DEF* XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
† Confidential treatment with respect to specific portions of this Exhibit has been requested, and such portions are omitted and have been filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
†† Portions of this exhibit (indicated by asterisks) have been omitted in accordance with the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission.
+ Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.
* Filed herewith.
** Exhibit 32.1 is being furnished and shall not be deemed to be “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, nor shall such exhibit be deemed to be incorporated by reference in any registration statement or other document filed under the Securities Act, or the Exchange Act, except as otherwise stated in such filing.