EDGAR 10-K Filing

Company CIK: 934549
Filing Year: 2024
Filename: 934549_10-K_2024_0000934549-24-000023.json

---

ITEM 1. BUSINESS
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
General
Acacia Research Corporation (the “Company,” “Acacia,” “we,” “us,” or "our") is focused on acquiring and managing companies across industries including but not limited to the industrial, energy, technology, and healthcare verticals. We focus on identifying, pursuing and acquiring businesses where we are uniquely positioned to deploy our strategy, people and processes to generate and compound shareholder value. We have a wide range of transactional and operational capabilities to realize the intrinsic value in the businesses that we acquire. Our ideal transactions include the acquisition of public or private companies, the acquisition of divisions of other companies, or structured transactions that can result in the recapitalization or restructuring of the ownership of a business to enhance value.
We are particularly attracted to situations where we believe value is not fully recognized, the value of certain operations are masked by a diversified business mix, or where private ownership has not invested the capital and/or resources necessary to support long-term value. Through our public market activities, we aim to initiate shareholding positions in public companies as a path to complete whole company acquisitions or strategic transactions that unlock value. We believe this business model is differentiated from private equity funds, which do not typically own public securities prior to acquiring companies, hedge funds, which do not typically acquire entire businesses, and other acquisition vehicles such Special Purpose Acquisition Companies, which are narrowly focused on completing one singular, defining acquisition.
Our focus is companies with market values in the sub-$2 billion range and particularly on businesses valued at $1 billion or less. We are, however, opportunistic, and may pursue acquisitions that are larger under the right circumstances.
We believe the Company has the potential to develop advantaged opportunities due to its:
•disciplined focus on identifying opportunities where the Company can be an advantaged buyer, initiate a transaction opportunity spontaneously, avoid a traditional sale process and complete the purchase of a business, division or other asset at an attractive price;
•willingness to invest across industries and in off-the-run, often misunderstood assets that suffer from a complexity discount;
•relationships and partnership abilities across functions and sectors; and
•strong expertise in corporate governance and operational transformation.
Our long-term focus positions our businesses to navigate economic cycles and allows sellers and other counterparties to have confidence that a transaction is not dependent on achieving the types of performance hurdles demanded by private equity sponsors. We consider opportunities based on the attractiveness of the underlying cash flows, without regard to a specific fund life or investment horizon.
People, Process and Performance
Our Company is built on the principles of People, Process and Performance. We have built a management team with demonstrated expertise in Research, Transactions and Execution, and Operations and Management of our targeted acquisitions. We believe our priorities and skills underpin a compelling value proposition for operating businesses, partners and future acquisition targets, including:
•the flexibility to consummate transactions using financing structures suited to the opportunity and involving third-party transaction structuring as needed;
•the ability to deliver ongoing financial and strategic support; and
•the financial capacity to maintain a long-term outlook and remain committed to a multi-year business plan.
Relationship with Starboard Value, LP
Our strategic relationship with Starboard Value, LP (together with certain funds and accounts affiliated with, or managed by, Starboard Value LP, “Starboard”), the Company's controlling shareholder, provides us access to industry expertise, and operating partners and industry experts to evaluate potential acquisition opportunities and enhance the oversight and value creation of such businesses once acquired. Starboard has provided, and we expect will continue to provide, ready access to its extensive network of industry executives and, as part of our relationship, Starboard has assisted, and we expect will continue to assist, with sourcing and evaluating appropriate acquisition opportunities.
Recapitalization
On October 30, 2022, the Company entered into a Recapitalization Agreement (the “Recapitalization Agreement”) with Starboard and certain funds and accounts affiliated with, or managed by, Starboard (collectively, the “Investors”), pursuant to which, among other things, the Company and Starboard agreed to enter into a series of transactions (the “Recapitalization”) to restructure Starboard’s investments in the Company in order to simplify the Company’s capital structure. Under the Recapitalization Agreement, the Company and Starboard agreed to take certain actions related to the Series A Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock in connection with the Recapitalization, including submitting a proposal for stockholder approval to remove the “4.89% blocker” provision contained in the Company's Amended and Restated Certificate of Designations (the “Amendment to the Amended and Restated Certificate of Designations”). The Company’s stockholders approved the Amendment to the Amended and Restated Certificate of Designations at the Company’s annual meeting of stockholders held on May 16, 2023, which became effective on June 30, 2023.
Subsequently, and in accordance with the terms contained in the Second Amended and Restated Certificate of Designations and the Recapitalization Agreement, on July 13, 2023, Starboard converted an aggregate amount of 350,000 shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock of the Company, par value $0.001 per share (the “Series A Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock”) into 9,616,746 shares of common stock, which included 27,704 shares of common stock issued in respect of accrued and unpaid dividends (the “Preferred Stock Conversion”). Further to the terms of the Recapitalization Agreement and in accordance with the terms of the Company’s Series B Warrants (the “Series B Warrants”), on July 13, 2023, Starboard also exercised 31,506,849 of the Series B Warrants through a combination of a “Note Cancellation” and a “Limited Cash Exercise” (each as defined in the Series B Warrants), resulting in the receipt by Starboard of 31,506,849 shares of common stock (the “Series B Warrants Exercise” and, together with the Preferred Stock Conversion, the “Recapitalization Transactions”), the cancellation of $60.0 million aggregate principal amount of the Company’s senior secured notes held by Starboard (as described further in Note 10, the “Senior Secured Notes”) and the receipt by the Company of aggregate gross proceeds of approximately $55.0 million. Following completion of the transactions contemplated by the Recapitalization Agreement, Starboard beneficially owns 61,123,595 shares of common stock as of March 11, 2024, representing approximately 61.2% of the common stock based on 99,895,473 shares of common stock issued and outstanding. No shares of Series A Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock, no Series B Warrants, nor any Senior Secured Notes remain outstanding. Refer to Note 10 to the consolidated financial statements for a detailed description of the Recapitalization and the Recapitalization Transactions.
Services Agreement
On December 12, 2023, the Company entered into a Services Agreement with Starboard (the “Services Agreement”), pursuant to which, upon the Company’s request, Starboard will provide to the Company certain trade execution, research, due diligence and other services. Starboard has agreed to provide the services on an expense reimbursement basis and no separate fee will be charged by Starboard for the services. Pursuant to the Services Agreement, the Company has agreed that Starboard (and certain of its affiliates) will not be liable to the Company for acts or omissions relating to the Services Agreement in the absence of bad faith, fraud, willful misconduct or gross negligence. The Company will also indemnify and advance expenses to Starboard (and certain of its affiliates) against any loss, cost or expense relating to third party claims in connection with the services or the Services Agreement. The Services Agreement provides (i) that certain work product developed by each of the Company and Starboard will be owned by the party that produced such work product and (ii) for mutual confidentiality obligations between the Company and Starboard for information disclosed pursuant to the Services Agreement. Either the Company or Starboard may terminate the Services Agreement at any time upon thirty days’ written notice. The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Audit Committee”), consisting of entirely of disinterested directors who are independent of Starboard, reviewed, directed the negotiation of the material terms of, and ultimately approved the Services Agreement prior to the Company’s execution thereof. The Audit Committee received, reviewed, and considered a number of factors prior to such approval, including, but not limited to, (i) the business purpose of the Services Agreement, (ii) whether comparable terms of the Services Agreement would be available to the Company in a transaction with an unrelated party and (iii) the benefits of the Services Agreement to the Company’s business and operations.
Core Corporate Development and Investment Approach
Going forward, we plan to continue focusing on creating transactions where we are able to acquire operating businesses and strategic assets that we believe are undervalued. Our expertise in, and experience with, complex situations enables us to discover and structure opportunities that are attractive for our shareholders and the leadership of the businesses we purchase. We utilize our capabilities across Research, Transactions and Execution, and Operations and Management to drive the discovery, investment, acquisition and integration of such target opportunities.
Research
We seek to identify companies, both public and private, at an appreciable discount to intrinsic value. We have a broad mandate, with a particular interest in businesses operating in the industrial, energy, technology, and healthcare sectors.
Our team is focused on identifying acquisition opportunities across the public and private markets where we are positioned to generate enduring shareholder value. Overall, we believe our acquisition pipeline is robust, and is a product of our public market research expertise, as well as our private market sourcing process.
The success of our strategy depends on our ability to properly identify acquisition candidates. Our research process focuses on, though is not limited to, the below considerations:
•engaging in a substantial amount of detailed fundamental research, both internally and in conjunction with third-parties;
•critically evaluating management teams;
•identifying and assessing financial and operational strengths and weaknesses absolutely and relative to industry competitors;
•researching and evaluating relevant industry information; and
•thoughtfully negotiating acquisition terms and conditions.
Transactions and Execution
Acacia is focused on the identification, acquisition and integration of both public and private companies. We are uniquely positioned to catalyze change with the support of our long-term capital base, depth of industry relationships and differentiated approach to transaction structuring.
Private Market Acquisitions
Acacia is focused on acquiring businesses across the private market landscape. We believe we are uniquely positioned to empower best-in-class operators as they seek to build enduring businesses within their vertical of focus. Partnering with Acacia represents an opportunity for business leaders, entrepreneurs and founders to grow their business without the constraints of a private equity fund.
Public Market Acquisitions
Acacia is focused on acquiring businesses across the public market landscape. We believe we are uniquely positioned to catalyze change within companies where we have developed, alongside our industry advisors, a differentiated view of the value creation opportunity within a given business. We evaluate public companies as currently constructed today, free of historical strategic decisions made with regard to the target in question. Where appropriate, this empowers us to unlock value through, but not limited to, identifying opportunities for improved execution, identifying opportunities where the sum-of-the-parts may be greater than the whole, and acquiring non-core strategic assets.
Once we identify a favorable public market acquisition opportunity, we may purchase a strategic block of shares in the target company. From that point, the process of consummating a transaction or acquisition can be time-consuming and complex, taking months if not a year or longer to complete.
During that time we will continue to leverage our management team’s experience and expertise in researching and valuing prospective target businesses, as well as negotiating the ultimate acquisition of such target businesses. We will also leverage the extensive networks of our operating partners, who are essential partners in identifying and executing acquisitions and managing for value creation.
Operations and Management
Our operational strategy involves identifying critical operating management either within the businesses or divisions we acquire or from our extensive executive network. We support the management teams of each of our acquired businesses by, among other things:
•financing internal growth strategies;
•supporting attractive external growth and acquisition opportunities;
•providing resources to assist management in controlling overhead costs and leveraging business-wide resources;
•implementing operational efficiencies; and
•sharing best practices across our portfolio companies.
Our Operations
Intellectual Property Operations - Patent Licensing, Enforcement and Technologies Business
We invest in intellectual property ("IP") and related absolute return assets and engage in the licensing and enforcement of patented technologies. Through our Patent Licensing, Enforcement and Technologies Business, we are a principal in the licensing and enforcement of patent portfolios, with our operating subsidiaries obtaining the rights in the patent portfolio or purchasing the patent portfolio outright. While we, from time to time, partner with inventors and patent owners, from small entities to large corporations, we assume all responsibility for advancing operational expenses while pursuing a patent licensing and enforcement program. When applicable we share net licensing revenue with our patent partners as that program matures, on a pre-arranged and negotiated basis. We may also provide upfront capital to patent owners as an advance against future licensing revenue.
During the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, we did not acquire any new patent portfolios. During 2021, we acquired one new patent portfolio consisting of Wi-Fi 6 standard essential patents. In 2020, we acquired five new patent portfolios consisting of (i) flash memory technology, (ii) voice activation and control technology, (iii) wireless networks,
(iv) internet search, advertising and cloud computing technology and (v) GPS navigation. The patents and patent rights acquired in 2021 and 2020 have estimated economic useful lives of approximately five years.
Currently, on a consolidated basis, our operating subsidiaries own or control the rights to multiple patent portfolios, which include U.S. patents and certain foreign counterparts, covering technologies used in a variety of industries. We generate revenues and related cash flows from the granting of IP rights for the use of patented technologies that our operating subsidiaries control or own.
We have established a proven track record of licensing and enforcement success with over 1,600 license agreements executed as of December 31, 2023, across nearly 200 patent portfolio licensing and enforcement programs. As of December 31, 2023, we have generated gross licensing revenue of approximately $1.8 billion, and have returned $865.2 million to our patent partners. During the past five calendar years ending on December 31, 2023, we generated gross licensing revenue of approximately $225.7 million and returned approximately $84.9 million to our patent partners.
Refer to Item 7. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” for additional information concerning our Patent Licensing, Enforcement and Technologies business.
Energy Operations Business
In November 2023, we invested $10.0 million to acquire a 50.4% equity interest in Benchmark Energy II, LLC ("Benchmark"). Headquartered in Austin, Texas, Benchmark is an independent oil and gas company engaged in the acquisition, production and development of oil and gas assets in mature resource plays in Texas and Oklahoma. Benchmark is run by an experienced management team led by Chief Executive Officer Kirk Goehring, who previously served as Chief Operating Officer of both Benchmark and Jones Energy, Inc. Benchmark’s existing assets consist of over 13,000 net acres primarily located in Roberts and Hemphill Counties in Texas, and an interest in over 125 wells, the majority of which are operated. Benchmark seeks to acquire predictable and shallow decline, cash-flowing oil and gas properties whose value can be enhanced via a disciplined, field optimization strategy, with risk managed through robust commodity hedges and low leverage. Through its investment in Benchmark, the Company, along with the Benchmark management team, will evaluate future growth and acquisitions of oil and gas assets at attractive valuations. The Company's consolidated financial statements include Benchmark's consolidated operations from November 13, 2023 through December 31, 2023. Refer to Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements elsewhere herein for additional information.
On February 16, 2024, Benchmark entered into a Purchase and Sale Agreement (the “Purchase and Sale Agreement”) with Revolution Resources II, LLC, Revolution II NPI Holding Company, LLC, Jones Energy, LLC, Nosley Assets, LLC, Nosley Acquisition, LLC, and Nosley Midstream, LLC (collectively, “Revolution”). Pursuant to the Purchase and Sale Agreement, Benchmark has agreed to purchase and Revolution has agreed to sell certain upstream assets and related facilities (the “Assets”) in Texas and Oklahoma, upon the terms and subject to the conditions of the Purchase and Sale Agreement (such purchase and sale, together with the other transactions contemplated by the Purchase Sale Agreement, the “Revolution Transaction”). The Assets include approximately 140,000 net acres and approximately 470 operated producing wells in the Western Anadarko Basin throughout the Texas Panhandle and Western Oklahoma.
Under the terms and conditions of the Purchase and Sale Agreement, which has an economic effective date of March 1, 2024, the aggregate consideration to be paid to Revolution in the Revolution Transaction will consist of $145.0 million in cash (the “Purchase Price”), subject to customary post-closing adjustments. Benchmark expects the Revolution Transaction to close in the second quarter of 2024 subject to customary closing conditions.
The Company’s expected contribution to Benchmark to fund its portion of the Purchase Price, is $57.5 million, which the Company anticipates will be funded from cash on hand. The remainder of the Purchase Price is expected to be funded by a combination of borrowings by Benchmark under a new revolving credit agreement of approximately $72.5 million and the remaining being funded through a cash contribution of approximately $15 million from McArron Partners, the other investor in Benchmark. Following the Revolution Transaction, the Company’s interest in Benchmark is expected to be approximately 73.1%.
Refer to Item 7. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” for additional Energy Operations information.
Industrial Operations Business
In October 2021, we consummated our first operating company acquisition of Printronix Holding Corp. (“Printronix”). Printronix is a leading manufacturer and distributor of industrial impact printers, also known as line matrix printers, and related consumables and services. Printers consist of hardware and embedded software and may be sold with maintenance service agreements, which are serviced by outside contractors. Printronix’s line matrix printers are used for mission critical applications within these industries, including labeling and inventory management, build sheets, invoicing, manifests and bills of lading, and reporting. In China, India and other developing countries in Asia and Africa, our printers are also prevalent in the banking and government sectors. Printronix has manufacturing, configuration and/or distribution sites located in Malaysia, the United States, Singapore, China and the Netherlands, along with sales and support locations around the world to support its global network of users, channel partners, and strategic alliances. Consumable products include inked ribbons which are used within Printronix's printers. Printronix’s products are primarily sold through Printronix’s global network of channel partners, such as dealers and distributors, to end-users. This acquisition was made at what we believe to be an attractive purchase price, and we are now supporting existing management in its execution of strategic partnerships to generate growth.
Refer to Item 7. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” for additional Industrial Operations information.
Competition
We face intense competition in identifying, evaluating and executing strategic acquisitions from other entities having a business objective similar to ours, including private equity groups and operating businesses seeking strategic acquisitions. We compete with financial firms, corporate buyers and others investing in strategic opportunities. Many of these competitors may have greater financial and human capital resources than we have.
Additionally, our Patent Licensing, Enforcement and Technologies Business faces intense competition in identifying, evaluating and executing strategic acquisitions from other entities having similar business objectives. We compete with financial firms, corporate buyers and others investing in strategic opportunities and acquiring IP. Additionally, universities and other technology sources compete against us as they seek to develop and commercialize technologies and may receive financing for basic research in exchange for the exclusive right to commercialize resulting inventions. Many of these competitors may have greater financial and human capital resources than we have. We may find more companies entering the market for similar technology opportunities, which may reduce our market share in one or more technology industries that we currently or in the future may rely upon to generate future revenue.
Lastly, our Energy Operations Business faces intense competition in identifying, evaluating, and executing attractive oil and gas asset acquisitions from other entities having similar business objectives, including major and independent oil and natural gas companies and private equity groups. Our Energy Operations Business also competes for drilling rigs and other equipment and labor required to drill, complete, operate and develop its properties. Many of our Energy Operations Business’ competitors have substantially greater financial resources, staffs, facilities and other resources. In addition, larger competitors may be able to absorb the burden of any changes in federal, state and local laws and regulations more easily than our Energy Operations Business, which could adversely affect its competitive position. These competitors may be willing and able to pay more for drilling rigs, leasehold and mineral acreage and productive oil and natural gas properties and may be able to identify, evaluate, bid for and purchase a greater number of properties and prospects than our Energy Operations Business can. The oil and natural gas industry also competes with other energy-related industries in supplying the energy and fuel requirements of industrial, commercial and individual consumers.
Information Security
We are highly dependent on informational and operational technology networks and systems to securely process, transmit and store electronic information. Cyberattacks on such systems continue to grow in frequency, complexity and sophistication. These attacks can create system disruptions, shutdowns or unauthorized disclosure of confidential information, including non-public personal information, consumer data and proprietary business information.
We remain focused on making strategic investments in information security to protect the clients and informational and operational technology systems of our operating subsidiaries and unconsolidated affiliates. This includes both capital expenditures and operating expenses on hardware, software, personnel and consulting services. As the primary products and services of our operating subsidiaries and unconsolidated affiliates evolve, we apply a comprehensive approach to the
mitigation of identified security risks. We have established risk management policies, including those related to information security and cybersecurity, designed to monitor and mitigate such risks.
Title to Oil and Natural Gas Properties
It is customary in the oil and natural gas industry to make only a preliminary review of title to undeveloped oil and natural gas leases at the time they are acquired and to obtain more extensive title examinations at the time one is preparing to develop the undeveloped leases and when acquiring producing properties. In future acquisitions, our Energy Operations Business will conduct title examinations on material portions of such properties in a manner generally consistent with industry practice. Certain of our Energy Operations Business oil and natural gas properties may be subject to certain imperfections in title, encumbrances, easements, servitudes or other restrictions, none of which, in management's opinion, will in the aggregate materially restrict its operations.
Human Capital
As of December 31, 2023, on a consolidated basis, we had 170 full-time employees and two contractors. We believe we have good relations with our employees. As of December 31, 2023, our parent company had 12 full-time employees and one contractor, our Intellectual Property Operations Business had seven full-time employees and no contractors; our Industrial Operations Business had 145 full-time employees and no contractors; and our Energy Operations Business had six full-time employees and one contractor.
Additionally, we have a strategic relationship with Starboard that has provided, and we expect will continue to provide, us access to industry expertise and operating partners and industry experts to evaluate potential acquisition opportunities and enhance the oversight and value creation of such businesses once acquired. Starboard has provided, and we expect will continue to provide, ready access to its extensive network of industry executives and, as part of our relationship, Starboard has assisted, and we expect will continue to assist, with sourcing and evaluating appropriate acquisition opportunities.
Executive Officers and Directors
Information About our Executive Officers
Name Position
Martin ("MJ") D. McNulty, Jr. Chief Executive Officer
Jason Soncini General Counsel
Robert Rasamny Chief Administrative Officer
Kirsten Hoover Interim Chief Financial Officer
Name Position
Gavin Molinelli Senior Partner and Co-Portfolio Manager of Starboard Value LP
Martin ("MJ") D. McNulty, Jr. Chief Executive Officer of the Company
Isaac T. Kohlberg Senior Associate Provost and Chief Technology Development Officer at Harvard University
Maureen O' Connell Member of the Board of Directors of Board of ISACA and HH Global Ltd.
Geoff Ribar Member of the Board of Directors of Director of MACOM Technology
Ajay Sundar Managing Director at Starboard Value LP
Katharine Wolanyk Managing Director at Burford Capital, LLC
Where You Can Find Additional Information
For further details of the development of our business, refer to our website at www.acaciaresearch.com. The information on our website is not part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K and is not incorporated herein by reference.

---

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
Our short and long-term success is subject to numerous risks and uncertainties, many of which involve factors that are difficult to predict or beyond our control. As a result, an investment in our common stock involves risks. Our stockholders should carefully consider the risks described below, together with all of the other information included in this Annual Report, as well as in our other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), in evaluating our business. If any of these risks are realized, our business, financial condition, results of operations, and prospects could be materially adversely affected, and the trading price of our common stock may decline significantly. Furthermore, additional risks and uncertainties of which we are currently unaware, or which we currently consider to be immaterial, could have a material adverse effect on our business. Certain statements below constitute “forward-looking statements,” which are subject to numerous risks and uncertainties, including those described in this section. For additional information, refer to the section entitled “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” within this Annual Report.
Risks Related to the Pending Revolution Transaction
The consummation of the Revolution Transaction is subject to a number of conditions that may not be satisfied or completed on a timely basis or at all. Accordingly, there can be no assurance as to when or if the Revolution Transaction will be completed, and the failure to complete the Revolution Transaction could have a material and adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
Although we expect to complete the Revolution Transaction in the second quarter of 2024, there can be no assurances as to the exact timing of the closing or that the Revolution Transaction will be completed at all. The consummation of the Revolution Transaction is subject to the satisfaction or waiver of a number of conditions contained in the related Purchase and Sale Agreement, including, among others, the absence of any governmental order restraining, enjoining or otherwise prohibiting the consummation of the Revolution Transaction or any pending governmental proceeding in respect thereof. Such conditions, some of which are beyond our control, may not be satisfied or waived in a timely manner or at all and therefore make the completion and timing of the Revolution Transaction uncertain. In addition, the Purchase and Sale Agreement contains certain termination rights for both parties, which if exercised will also result in the Revolution Transaction not being consummated. Any such termination or any failure to otherwise complete the Revolution Transaction could result in various consequences, including, among others: our being adversely impacted by the failure to pursue other beneficial opportunities due to the time and resources committed by management to the Revolution Transaction, without realizing any of the benefits of completing the Revolution Transaction; being required to pay our legal, accounting and other expenses relating to the Revolution Transaction; the market price of our common stock being adversely impacted to the extent that the current market price reflects a market assumption that the Revolution Transaction will be completed; and negative reactions from the financial markets that may occur if the anticipated benefits of the Revolution Transaction are not realized. Such consequences could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
Even if the Revolution Transaction is completed, our Energy Operations Business may be unable to successfully integrate the Assets into its business or achieve the anticipated benefits of the Revolution Transaction.
The success of the Revolution Transaction will depend, in part, on our Energy Operations Business’ ability to realize the anticipated benefits and cost savings from integrating the Assets into its business, and there can be no assurance that it will be able to successfully integrate or otherwise realize the anticipated benefits of the Revolution Transaction. Difficulties in integrating the Assets into our Energy Operations Business and its ability to manage the combined business may result in it performing differently than expected, in operational challenges or in the delay or failure to realize anticipated expense-related efficiencies, and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. Potential difficulties that may be encountered in the integration process include, among others:
•the inability to successfully integrate the Assets operationally, in a manner that permits us to achieve the full revenue, expected cash flows and cost savings anticipated from the Revolution Transaction;
•not realizing anticipated operating synergies; and
•potential unknown liabilities and unforeseen expenses, delays or regulatory conditions associated with the Revolution Transaction.
Risks Related to Our Business and Business Strategy
We intend to grow our company by acquiring additional operating businesses and intellectual property assets which may not occur, and any acquisitions that we complete will be costly and could negatively affect our results of operations, and dilute our stockholders’ ownership, or cause us to incur significant expense, and we may not realize the expected benefits of our operating businesses because of difficulties related to integration.
We intend to grow our company by acquiring additional operating businesses and intellectual property assets. A significant portion of growth and success will be dependent on identifying and acquiring operating companies and intellectual property at attractive prices to realize their intrinsic value. However, there can be no assurance that we will identify attractive acquisition targets, that acquisition opportunities we identify will be available on acceptable terms or at attractive prices, or that we will be able to obtain necessary financing or regulatory approvals to complete any acquisitions.
Further, the success of any acquisition depends on, among other things, our ability to combine our business with the acquired business in a manner that does not materially disrupt existing relationships and allows us to achieve development and operational synergies.
Acquisitions involve numerous risks and uncertainties, including:
•difficulties in integrating and managing the combined operations, technology platforms, or offerings of any business we acquire, and realizing the anticipated economic, operational and other benefits of the acquisition in a timely manner, which could result in substantial costs and delays;
•failure to execute on the intended strategy and synergies;
•failure of the acquired operating businesses to achieve anticipated revenue, earnings, or cash flow;
•diversion of our management’s attention or other resources from our existing business;
•higher-than-expected earn-out payments, unforeseen transaction-related costs or delays or other circumstances such as disputes with or the loss of key or other personnel from acquired businesses;
•our inability to maintain the key customers, business relationships, suppliers, and brand potential of acquired operating businesses;
•uncertainty of entry into businesses or geographies in which we have limited or no prior experience or in which competitors have stronger positions;
•unanticipated costs associated with pursuing acquisitions or greater than expected costs in integrating the acquired businesses;
•responsibility for the liabilities of acquired businesses, including those that were not disclosed to us or exceed our estimates, such as liabilities arising out of the failure to maintain effective privacy, data protection and cybersecurity controls, and liabilities arising out of the failure to comply with applicable laws and regulations, including tax laws;
•difficulties in or costs associated with assigning or transferring to us the acquired operating business’ intellectual property or its licenses to third-party intellectual property;
•inability to maintain our culture and values, ethical standards, controls, procedures, and policies;
•challenges in integrating the workforce of acquired companies and the potential loss of key employees of the acquired companies;
•challenges in integrating and auditing the financial statements of acquired companies that have not historically prepared financial statements in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles; and
•potential accounting charges to the extent goodwill and intangible assets recorded in connection with an acquisition, such as trademarks, customer relationships, or intellectual property, are later determined to be impaired and written down in value.
It is possible that the integration process of our acquired businesses could result in the loss of key employees; the disruption of our ongoing business or the ongoing business of the acquired operating businesses; or inconsistencies in standards, controls, procedures or policies that could adversely affect our ability to maintain relationships with third parties and employees or to achieve the anticipated benefits of the acquisition. Integration efforts between us and the acquired businesses will also require our management’s significant attention away from other opportunities that could have been beneficial to our stockholders. An inability to realize the full extent of, or any of, the anticipated benefits of any acquisition, as well as any delays encountered in the integration process, could have an adverse effect on our business and results of operations, which may affect the value of the shares of our common stock after the completion of our acquisitions. If we are unable to achieve these objectives, the anticipated benefits of the acquisition may not be realized fully or at all or may take longer to realize than expected. In particular, our acquisitions may not be accretive to our stock value in the near or long term.
In addition, we may issue shares of our common stock or other equity securities in connection with future acquisitions of businesses and technologies. Any such issuances of shares of our common stock could result in material dilution to our existing stockholders.
We expect to incur additional costs integrating the operations of any operating business and utilizing any intellectual property assets we acquire, as we incur higher development and regulatory costs, as the case may be, and must hire relevant personnel. If the total costs of the integration or utilization of our businesses or assets exceed the anticipated benefits of the acquisition, our financial results could be adversely affected.
Accordingly, we may not succeed in addressing the risks associated with our acquisition of Printronix, Benchmark, or any other operating business we acquire in the future. The inability to integrate successfully, or in a timely fashion, the business, technologies, products, personnel, or operations of any acquired business or utilization of any assets, could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, and financial condition.
Our success is dependent on our ability to attract and retain employees and management teams of our operating businesses, the loss of any of whom could materially adversely affect our financial condition, business and results of operations.
Our business model requires qualified and competent professionals and management teams to identify and develop advantaged opportunities and to direct day-to-day activities of our operating businesses, as the case may be. Accordingly, recruiting and retaining qualified personnel is important to our strategy and operating businesses’ operations. Additionally, although our operating businesses have adequate personnel for the current business environment, unpredictable increases in demand for goods and services may exacerbate the risk of not having sufficient numbers of trained or qualified personnel, which could have a negative impact on our results of operations, financial condition and liquidity.
Our operating businesses also need qualified and competent personnel to execute their business plans and serve their customers, suppliers and other stakeholders. In order to compete, we must attract, retain, and motivate both executives and other key employees, and our failure to do so could harm our financial performance. Hiring and retaining qualified executives, operations personnel (including operating partners), engineers, technical staff, sales, marketing and support positions are and will be critical to businesses, and competition for experienced employees in the industries of our operating businesses can be intense.
To help attract, retain, and motivate qualified employees and management, we must offer a competitive compensation package, which could include a combination of cash, cash-based incentive awards and share-based incentive awards, such as restricted stock units. Because our cash-based and share-based incentive awards are dependent upon the performance conditions relating to our performance and the performance of the price our common stock and other performance-based metrics, the future value of such awards are uncertain. If the anticipated value of such incentive awards does not materialize, or if the total compensation package ceases to be viewed as competitive, our ability to attract, retain, and motivate employees could be weakened, which could harm our results of operations.
Our success will further substantially depend on our ability to attract and retain key members of our management team and officers. If we lose one or more of these key employees, our results of operations, and in turn, the value of our common
stock could be materially adversely affected. Although we may enter into employment agreements with our officers, there can be no assurance that the entire term of any employment agreement will be served or that any employment agreement will be renewed upon expiration.
The success of our Company and the integration of our operating businesses is dependent on our relationship with Starboard.
Our strategic relationship with Starboard has provided, and we expect will continue to provide, us access to industry expertise, and operating partners and industry experts to evaluate potential acquisition opportunities and enhance the oversight and value creation of businesses we acquire. As part of our relationship, Starboard has assisted, and is expected to continue assisting, us with sourcing and evaluating appropriate acquisition opportunities. If we or Starboard were to discontinue this relationship, we may not be able to continue to adequately source acquisition opportunities.
Additionally, the success of our Company depends on the continued availability of, and our access to, Starboard’s industry expertise and operating partners and industry experts. We do not have employment agreements with these individuals who are independent of Starboard and Starboard’s key personnel. If these individuals do not maintain their existing relationships with Starboard and its affiliates, we may not be able to identify appropriate replacements in order to continue to adequately source acquisition opportunities or manage our existing operating businesses.
The due diligence process we undertake in connection with new acquisitions of operating businesses or intellectual property assets may not reveal all material facts.
Before making acquisitions, we conduct due diligence that we deem reasonable and appropriate based on the facts and applicable circumstances. When conducting due diligence, we may be required to evaluate important and complex business, financial, tax, accounting, environmental and legal issues. Outside consultants, legal advisers, accountants and investment banks may be involved in the due diligence process in varying degrees depending on the type of business and transaction. Nevertheless, when conducting due diligence and making an assessment regarding an acquisition, we rely on the resources available to us, including information provided by the target of the transaction and, in some circumstances, third party investigations. The due diligence investigation that we carry out with respect to any opportunity may not reveal or highlight all relevant facts (including fraud) that may be necessary or helpful in evaluating such opportunity. Moreover, such an investigation will not necessarily result in the acquisition being successful. If we do not discover all material facts during due diligence, we may fail to integrate our operating businesses and execute our strategic goals, which may impact our financial performance.
Our acquisition strategy may include acquisitions of privately held companies, which provide more limited information, may be dependent on the talents and efforts of only a few key portfolio company personnel, and have greater vulnerability to economic downturns when compared to public company targets.
From time to time, we acquire, and may acquire, privately held companies. Generally, little public information exists about these companies, and we are required to rely on diligence efforts to obtain adequate information to evaluate the potential returns from investing in these companies. These companies and their financial information are not subject to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and other rules that govern public companies. If we are unable to uncover all material information about these companies, we may not make a fully informed decision, and we may lose money on our acquisition.
If, in the future, we cease to control and operate our operating businesses, we may be deemed to be an investment company under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended.
From time to time, we have made, and we may continue to make, investments in businesses that we will not operate or control. If we make significant investments in businesses we do not operate or control, or cease to operate and control our operating businesses, we may be deemed to be an investment company under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “Investment Company Act”). If we were deemed to be an investment company, we would have to register as an investment company under the Investment Company Act, obtain exemptive relief from the SEC, or modify our investments or organizational structure or our contract rights to fall outside the definition of an investment company.
Registered investment companies are subject to extensive, restrictive and potentially adverse regulations that impose, among other things, (i) limitations on capital structure, including the incurrence of indebtedness or the issuance of senior securities; (ii) restrictions on specified investments; (iii) prohibitions on transactions with affiliates; and (iv) compliance with reporting, record keeping, voting, proxy disclosure and other rules and regulations that would significantly change our
operations. Registered investment companies are not permitted to operate their business in the manner in which we currently operate and plan to operate our business in the future.
We plan to monitor the value of our investments and structure our operations and transactions to qualify for exclusions under the Investment Company Act or to remain outside of the definition of an investment company. Accordingly, we may structure transactions in a less advantageous manner than if we did not have Investment Company Act concerns, or we may avoid otherwise economically desirable transactions due to those concerns. In addition, adverse developments with respect to our ownership of our operating subsidiaries, including significant appreciation or depreciation in the market value of certain of our publicly traded holdings, could result in our inadvertently becoming an investment company. If it were established that we were required to register as an investment company and failed to do so, there would be a risk, among other material adverse consequences, that we could become subject to monetary penalties or injunctive relief, or both, in an action brought by the SEC and that we would be prohibited from engaging in our business activities. In addition, any contracts that we entered into during the period in which we were deemed to be operating as an unregistered investment company would be unenforceable unless a court were to require enforcement, and a court could appoint a receiver to take control of us and liquidate our business.
Both we and our operating businesses outsource a number of services to third-party service providers, which are subject to risk of disruptions, delays, and decrease in our control, which could adversely impact our results of operations.
Both we and our operating businesses outsource a number of services, including certain hosted software applications for confidential data storage and “cloud computing” technology for such storage to domestic and overseas third-party service providers. While outsourcing arrangements may lower our cost of operations, they also reduce our direct control over the services rendered. Such diminished control could have an effect on the quality or quantity of products delivered or services rendered, on our ability to quickly respond to changing market conditions, or our ability to ensure compliance with all applicable domestic and foreign laws and regulations.
In addition, many of these outsourced service providers, including certain hosted software applications that we use for confidential data storage, employ cloud computing technology for such storage. These providers’ cloud computing systems may be susceptible to cyber incidents, such as intentional cyberattacks aimed at theft of sensitive data or inadvertent cybersecurity compromises that are outside of our control. Miscalculations in our outsourcing strategies, deficiencies by our third-party service providers to not perform as anticipated or not adequately protect our data, or delays or difficulties in enhancing business processes, may result in operational difficulties (such as limitations on our ability to ship products), increased costs, service interruptions or delays, loss of intellectual property rights or other sensitive data, quality and compliance issues, and challenges in managing our product inventory or recording and reporting financial and management information, any of which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We may be limited in our ability to use our net operating losses and certain other tax attributes.
Our ability to use our federal and state net operating losses to offset potential future taxable income and related income taxes that would otherwise be due is dependent upon our generation of future taxable income before the expiration dates of the net operating losses, and we cannot predict with certainty when, or whether, we will generate sufficient taxable income to use all or any portion of our net operating losses. In addition, utilization of net operating losses to offset potential future taxable income and related income taxes that would otherwise be due is subject to annual limitations under the “ownership change” provisions of Sections 382 and 383 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), and similar state provisions, which may result in the expiration of net operating losses before future utilization. In general, under the Code, if a corporation undergoes an “ownership change,” generally defined as a greater than 50% change (by value) in its equity ownership over a three-year period, the corporation’s ability to use its pre-change net operating losses and other pre-change tax attributes (such as research and development credit carryforwards) to offset its post-change taxable income or taxes may be limited. Changes in our stock ownership, some of which may be outside of our control, could in the future result in an ownership change. Although we have adopted a provision in our certificate of incorporation designed to discourage investors from acquiring ownership of our common stock in a manner that could trigger a Code Section 382 ownership change, and we have completed studies to provide reasonable assurance that a Code Section 382 ownership change limitation has not occurred, we cannot be certain that a taxing authority would reach the same conclusion. If, after a review or audit, a Code Section 382 ownership change limitation were deemed to have occurred, utilization of our domestic net operating losses and tax credit carryforwards could be limited in future periods and a portion of the carryforwards could expire before being available to reduce future income tax liabilities.
Data security and integrity are critically important to our business, and cybersecurity incidents-including cyberattacks, breaches of security, unauthorized access to or disclosure of confidential information, business disruption, or the perception that confidential information is not secure-could result in a material loss of business, regulatory enforcement, substantial legal liability and/or significant harm to our reputation, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Improper access to, misappropriation, destruction or disclosure of confidential, personal or proprietary data could result in significant harm to our reputation or the reputation of any of our operating businesses.
The security and protection of our and their data is one of our top priorities. We and our operating businesses have devoted significant resources to maintain and regularly upgrade the wide array of physical, technical and contractual safeguards that we and they employ to provide security around the collection, storage, use, access and delivery of information we and they possess. We and they have implemented various measures to manage the risks related to system and network security and disruptions, but an actual or perceived security breach, a failure to make adequate disclosures to the public or relevant agencies following any such event or a significant and extended disruption in the functioning of information technology systems could damage our or one of our operating businesses’ reputation and cause us to lose opportunities or them to lose clients, adversely impact our operations, sales or results of operations and require us or them to incur significant expense to address and remediate or otherwise resolve such issues.
Although neither we nor our business have incurred material losses or liabilities to date as a result of any breaches, unauthorized disclosure, loss or corruption of our or their data or the inability of their clients to access their systems, such events could result in proprietary, confidential or otherwise protected information being lost or stolen, including client, employee or business data, disrupt their operations, subject us or them to substantial regulatory and legal proceedings and potential liability and fines, result in a material loss of business and/or significantly harm our or their reputation. If we are unable to efficiently manage the vulnerability of our systems and effectively maintain and upgrade system safeguards, we and they may incur unexpected costs and certain of our or their systems may become more vulnerable to unauthorized access.
Due to concerns regarding data privacy and security, a growing number of legislative and regulatory bodies have adopted breach notification and other requirements in the event that information subject to such laws is accessed by unauthorized persons and additional regulations regarding the use, access, accuracy and security of such data are possible. Complying with such numerous and complex regulations can be expensive and difficult, and failure to comply with these regulations could subject us to regulatory scrutiny and liability. In many jurisdictions, including North America and the European Union, certain of our operating companies are or may in the future be subject to laws and regulations relating to the collection, use, retention, security and transfer of this information including the European Union and United Kingdom General Data Protection Regulation regimes. California also enacted legislation, the California Consumer Privacy Act of 2018 (“CCPA”) and the related California Privacy Rights Act (“CPRA”) that afford California residents expanded privacy protections and a private right of action for security breaches affecting their personal information. Since then, many other U.S. states have passed comprehensive data privacy laws and this number will likely continue to grow. These and other similar laws and regulations are frequently changing and are becoming increasingly complex and sometimes conflict among the various jurisdictions and countries in which certain of our operating companies provide services both in terms of substance and in terms of enforceability. This makes compliance challenging and expensive. For example, an operating company's failure to adhere to or successfully implement processes in response to changing regulatory requirements in this area could result in legal liability or impairment to our reputation in the marketplace.
If we or they are unable to protect our or their computer systems, software, networks, data and other technology assets it could have a material adverse effect on our or their business, financial condition and results of operations, and ultimately the value of our businesses.
Public health threats, pandemics and outbreaks of communicable diseases could have a material adverse effect on our operations, the operations of our business partners, and the global economy as a whole.
Public health threats, pandemics and outbreaks of communicable diseases could adversely impact our operations, as well as the operations of our licensees and other business partners. We have taken precautions in the operation of our own business and maintain an up-to-date disaster recovery and business continuity policy as well as have the systems and support to have our workforce work remotely for an indefinite period of time. However, future public health threats, pandemics or outbreaks of communicable diseases, similar to the COVID-19 outbreak, could have a material adverse effect on our business, operations and financial results.
Due to the completion of the transactions pursuant to the Recapitalization Agreement, we are a "controlled company" within the meaning of the Nasdaq listing standards and, as a result, qualify for, and may in the future decide to rely on, exemptions from certain corporate governance requirements. As a result, our stockholders will not have the same protections afforded to stockholders of companies that are subject to such requirements if in the future we determine to take advantage of any of the controlled company exemptions.
Due to the completion of the transactions pursuant to the Recapitalization Agreement, Starboard controls a majority of the voting power of our outstanding common stock. As of March 11, 2024, Starboard controlled approximately 61.2% of the voting power of our common stock. As a result, we qualify as a “controlled company” within the meaning of the corporate governance standards of Nasdaq. Under these rules, a listed company of which more than 50% of the voting power is held by an individual, group or another company is a “controlled company” and may avail itself of certain corporate governance exemptions afforded to controlled companies, including the requirements that a majority of the Board consist of independent directors, we have a nominating and corporate governance committee that is composed entirely of independent directors, and we have a compensation committee that is composed entirely of independent directors.
As of the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, we have not elected to rely on any of these exemptions. However, if in the future we decide to rely on some or all of these exemptions, our stockholders will not have the same protections afforded to stockholders of companies that are subject to all of the corporate governance requirements of Nasdaq.
Our principal stockholder, Starboard, controls 61.2% of the voting power of our Common Stock, and its interests may conflict with our other stockholders in the future.
Following completion of the transactions contemplated by the Recapitalization Agreement, Starboard beneficially owns 61,123,595 shares of common stock as of March 11, 2024, representing approximately 61.2% of the common stock based on 99,895,473 shares of common stock issued and outstanding as of such date. As a result, Starboard is able to control the election of our directors and thereby determine our corporate and management policies, including potential mergers or acquisitions, asset sales, amendment of our amended and restated certificate of incorporation or amended and restated bylaws and other significant corporate transactions for so long as Starboard and its affiliates retain significant ownership of us. Starboard and its affiliates may also direct us to make significant changes to our business operations and strategy, including with respect to, among other things, strategic acquisitions, investments and initiatives to reduce costs and expenses. This concentration of our ownership may delay or deter possible changes in control of the Company, which may reduce the value of an investment in our common stock. The interests of Starboard may not coincide with the interests of other holders of our common stock.
In the ordinary course of their business activities, Starboard and its affiliates may engage in activities where their interests conflict with our interests or those of our stockholders. Starboard and its affiliates also may pursue acquisition or investment opportunities that may be complementary to our business and, as a result, those acquisition or investment opportunities may not be available to us. In addition, Starboard may have an interest in pursuing acquisitions, divestitures and other transactions that, in their judgment, could enhance an investment in our Company, even though such transactions might involve risks to our stockholders.
In addition, Starboard and its affiliates are able to determine the outcome of all matters requiring stockholder approval and are able to cause or prevent a change of control of our Company or a change in the composition of our Board and could preclude any acquisition of our Company. This concentration of voting control could deprive our stockholders of an opportunity to receive a premium for shares of common stock as part of a sale of our Company and ultimately might affect the market price of our common stock.
Risks Related to our Intellectual Property Business and Industry
Our intellectual property business is reliant on the strength of our patent portfolios and is subject to evolving legislation, regulations, and rules associated with patent law.
The success of our intellectual property business is heavily dependent on obtaining and enforcing patents. Patent acquisition and enforcement is costly, time-consuming and inherently uncertain. Obtaining and enforcing patents across various industries, including the life science industry, involves a high degree of technological and legal complexity. Our patent rights may be affected by developments or uncertainty in U.S. or foreign patent statutes, patent case law, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office ("USPTO") rules and regulations and the rules and regulations of foreign patent offices. In addition, the United States may, at any time, enact changes to U.S. patent law and regulations, including by legislation, by regulatory
rulemaking, or by judicial precedent, that adversely affect the scope of patent protection available and weaken the rights of patent owners to obtain patents, enforce against patent infringement and obtain injunctions and/or damages. For example, over the past several years, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and the Supreme Court issued various opinions, and the USPTO modified its guidance for practitioners on multiple occasions, either narrowing the scope of patent protection available in certain circumstances or weakening the rights of patent owners in certain situations. Other countries may likewise enact changes to their patent laws in ways that adversely diminish the scope of patent protection and weaken the rights of patent owners to obtain patents, enforce against patent infringement, and obtain injunctions and/or damages. In addition to increasing uncertainty with regard to our ability to obtain patents in the future, this combination of events has created uncertainty with respect to the value of patents, once obtained. We cannot predict the breadth of claims that may be allowed or enforced in our patents or in third-party patents, and whether Congress or other foreign legislative bodies may pass patent reform legislation that is unfavorable to us, which, may in turn, affect the value of our patent assets.
Further, the United States and other governments may, at any time, enact changes to law and regulation that create new avenues for challenging the validity of issued patents. For example, the America Invents Act created new administrative post-grant proceedings, including post-grant review, inter-partes review, and derivation proceedings that allow third parties to challenge the validity of issued patents. This applies to all of our U.S. patents, even those issued before March 16, 2013. Because of a lower evidentiary standard in USPTO proceedings compared to the evidentiary standard in U.S. federal courts necessary to invalidate a patent claim, a third party could potentially provide evidence in a USPTO proceeding sufficient for the USPTO to hold a claim invalid even though the same evidence would be insufficient to invalidate the claim if first presented in a district court action. In addition to increasing uncertainty with regard to our ability to obtain patents in the future, this combination of events has created uncertainty with respect to the value of patents, once obtained. Depending on decisions by the U.S. Congress, the federal courts, and the USPTO, the laws and regulations governing patents could change in unpredictable ways that could weaken our ability to obtain new patents or to enforce our existing patents and patents that we might obtain in the future.
Additionally, new rules regarding the burden of proof in patent enforcement actions could significantly increase the cost of our enforcement actions, and new standards or limitations on liability for patent infringement could negatively impact our revenue derived from such enforcement actions. In addition, recent federal court decisions have lowered the threshold for obtaining attorneys’ fees in patent infringement cases and increased the level of deference given to a district court’s fee-shifting determination. These decisions may make it easier for district courts to shift a prevailing party’s attorneys’ fees to a non-prevailing party if the district court believes that the case was weak or conducted in an abusive manner. As a result, defendants in patent infringement actions brought by non-practicing entities may elect not to settle because these decisions make it much easier for defendants to get attorneys’ fees.
Finally, it is difficult to predict the outcome of patent enforcement litigation at the trial level and outcomes can be unfavorable. It can be difficult to understand complex patented technologies, and as a result, this may lead to a higher rate of unfavorable litigation outcomes. Moreover, in the event of a favorable outcome, there is often a higher rate of successful appeals in patent enforcement litigation than more standard business litigation. Such appeals are expensive and time consuming, resulting in increased costs and a potential for delayed or foregone revenue opportunities in the event of modification or reversal of favorable outcomes. Although we diligently pursue enforcement litigation, we cannot predict with reliability the decisions made by juries and trial courts.
We expect patent-related legal expenses to continue to fluctuate from period to period.
Our patent-related legal expenses may fluctuate based on the factors summarized herein, in connection with future trial dates, international enforcement, strategic patent portfolio prosecution and our current and future patent portfolio investment, prosecution, licensing and enforcement activities. The pursuit of enforcement actions in connection with our licensing and enforcement programs can involve certain risks and uncertainties, including the following:
•Increases in patent-related legal expenses associated with patent infringement litigation, including, but not limited to, increases in costs billed by outside legal counsel for discovery, depositions, economic analyses, damages assessments, expert witnesses and other consultants, re-exam and inter partes review costs, case-related audio/video presentations and other litigation support and administrative costs could increase our operating costs and decrease our profit generating opportunities;
•Our patented technologies and enforcement actions are complex and, as a result, we may be required to appeal adverse decisions by trial courts in order to successfully enforce our patents. Moreover, such appeals may not be successful;
•New legislation, regulations or rules related to enforcement actions, including any fee or cost shifting provisions, could significantly increase our operating costs and decrease our profit generating opportunities. Increased focus on the growing number of patent-related lawsuits may result in legislative changes which increase our costs and related risks of asserting patent enforcement actions;
•Courts may rule that our subsidiaries have violated certain statutory, regulatory, federal, local or governing rules or standards by pursuing such enforcement actions, which may expose us and our operating subsidiaries to material liabilities, which could harm our operating results and our financial position;
•The complexity of negotiations and potential magnitude of exposure for potential infringers associated with higher quality patent portfolios may lead to increased intervals of time between the filing of litigation and potential revenue events (i.e., markman dates, trial dates), which may lead to increased legal expenses, consistent with the higher revenue potential of such portfolios; and
•Fluctuations in overall patent portfolio related enforcement activities, which are impacted by the portfolio intake challenges discussed above that could harm our operating results and our financial position.
Patent litigation is inherently risky because courts may find our patents invalid, not infringed, or unenforceable, and the USPTO, or other relevant patent office, may either invalidate our patents or materially narrow the scope of their claims during the course of a reexamination, opposition or other such proceeding.
Patent litigation is inherently risky and may result in the invalidation of our patents, even if we are the plaintiff in an underlying action. It is difficult to predict the outcome of patent enforcement litigation at any level.
Although we diligently pursue enforcement litigation, we cannot predict with significant reliability the decisions made by juries and trial courts. At the trial level, it is often difficult for juries and trial judges to understand complex, patented technologies, and as a result, there is a higher rate of successful appeals in patent enforcement litigation than more standard business litigation.
The defendant to any case we bring may file as many appeals as allowed by right, including to District Court, the Federal Circuit and the Supreme Court. Such appeals are expensive and time-consuming, and the outcomes of such appeals are sometimes unpredictable, resulting in increased costs and reduced or delayed revenue which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition. These appeals may also result in the invalidation of our patents, which may have an adverse impact on our operations and financial performance.
In addition, counterparties in our patent litigation matters may devote a substantial amount of resources to avoid or limit a finding that they are liable for infringing on our patents or, in the event liability is found, to avoid or limit the amount of associated damages. There is a risk these counterparties may file inter-partes reviews, reexaminations or other proceedings with the USPTO or other government agencies in the United States or abroad in an attempt to invalidate, narrow the scope or render unenforceable the patents we own or control. If this were to occur, it may have a significant negative impact on the operations of our intellectual property business.
The enforcement of our intellectual property depends in part upon our ability to retain the best legal counsel in order to achieve favorable outcomes from litigation, and they may become conflicted out of representing us.
The success of our intellectual property business depends in part upon our ability to retain the best legal counsel to coordinate our patent infringement litigation matters. As our intellectual property business evolves, we expect it will become more difficult to find the best legal counsel to handle all of our patent matters due in part to potential conflicts of interest. This is because, from time to time, the counterparties to our litigation matters have previously engaged world class law firms that are specialized to the industries of the patents at issue in such matters. These previous engagements may have, or may in the future, result in these firms being conflicted out of representing us.
The inability to retain the best legal counsel to represent our operating businesses in infringement actions may result in unfavorable or adverse outcomes, which may result in losses, exhaustion of financial resources or other adverse effects which could encumber our ability to effectively operate our business or execute our business strategy. We cannot ensure that any of our current or prospective patent prosecution or litigation matters will result in a favorable outcome for us.
We may experience delays in successful prosecution, enforcement, and licensing of our patent portfolio.
The value of our patent portfolios is dependent upon the issuance of patents in a timely manner. More patent applications are filed each year, resulting in longer delays in getting patents issued by the USPTO. We believe this increase in patent applications has resulted in longer delays in obtaining approval of pending patent applications. If the USPTO experiences reductions in funding, it could have an adverse impact on the cost of processing pending patent applications and the value of those pending patent applications, negatively impacting the value of our patent portfolio pipeline. Further, reductions in funding from Congress could result in higher patent application filing and maintenance fees charged by the USPTO, causing an increase in our expenses. Application delays could cause delays in recognizing revenue from these patents and could cause us to miss opportunities to license patents before other competing technologies are developed or introduced into the market.
After prosecuting our patents, our Intellectual Property business can incur significant general and administrative and legal expense prior to entering into license agreements and generating license revenues. We spend considerable resources educating prospective licensees on the benefits of a license arrangement with us. As such, we may incur significant losses in any particular period before any associated revenue stream begins.
We are frequently engaged in litigation to enforce the terms of our existing license agreements, protect our trade secrets, or determine the validity and scope of the proprietary rights of others. Enforcement proceedings are typically protracted and complex. The costs are typically substantial, and the outcomes are unpredictable. Enforcement actions divert our managerial, technical, legal and financial resources from business operations and there are no assurances that such enforcement actions will result in favorable results for us.
Patent litigation schedules in general, and in particular trial dates, are subject to routine adjustment, and in most cases delay, as courts adjust their calendars or respond to requests from one or more parties. Trial dates often are rescheduled by the court for various reasons that are often unrelated to the underlying patent assets and typically for reasons that are beyond our control. As a result, to the extent such events are an indicator of possible future revenue opportunities for us, or other outcome determinative events, they may and often do change which can result in delay of the expected scheduled event. Any such delay could be significant and could affect the corresponding future revenue opportunities, thus adversely impacting our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Further, federal courts are becoming more crowded, and as a result, patent enforcement litigation is taking longer. Our patent enforcement actions are almost exclusively prosecuted in federal court. Federal trial courts that hear our patent enforcement actions also hear criminal cases. Criminal cases tend to take priority over our actions. As a result, it is difficult to predict the length of time it will take to complete an enforcement action. Moreover, we believe there is a trend in increasing numbers of civil lawsuits and criminal proceedings before federal judges and, as a result, we believe that the risk of delays in our patent enforcement actions will have a greater negative effect on our business in the future unless this trend changes.
Risks Related to our Energy Operations Business and Industry
If oil and gas prices decline from current levels, or if there is an increase in the differential between the NYMEX-WTI and NYMEX-Henry Hub or other benchmark prices of oil and the wellhead price we receive for our production, our cash flows from our Energy Operations Business will decline.
Historically, oil prices have been extremely volatile. The volatility of the energy markets makes it extremely difficult to predict future oil price movements with any certainty.
While our Energy Operations Business hedges a significant portion of its production, lower oil prices may decrease revenues and therefore, cash flows from operations. Prices for oil may fluctuate widely in response to relatively minor changes in supply of and demand for oil. Market uncertainty and a variety of additional factors that are beyond the control of our Energy Operations Business, include: the domestic and foreign supply of and demand for oil; market expectations about future prices of oil; the price and quantity of imports of crude oil; overall domestic and global economic conditions; political and economic conditions in other oil producing countries, including embargoes and continued hostilities in the Middle East and other sustained military campaigns, acts of terrorism or sabotage, and world-wide epidemics, including the coronavirus; the ability of the members of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries to agree to and maintain oil price and production controls; trading in oil derivative contracts; the level of consumer product demand; weather conditions and natural disasters; technological advances affecting energy consumption; domestic and foreign governmental
regulations and taxes; the proximity, cost, availability and capacity of oil pipelines and other transportation facilities; the impact of the U.S. dollar exchange rates on oil prices; and the price and availability of alternative fuels.
Also, the prices that our Energy Operations Business receives for oil and gas production often reflects a regional discount, based on the location of the production, to the relevant benchmark prices, such as the NYMEX-WTI and NYMEX-Henry Hub, that are used for calculating hedge positions. These discounts, if significant, could similarly adversely affect cash flows from operations and financial condition.
If commodity prices decline from current levels, production from some of Benchmark's assets may become uneconomic and cause write downs of the value of its properties, which may adversely affect its ability to borrow, its financial condition and its ability to make distributions.
If commodity prices decline from current levels, some of Benchmark's assets may become uneconomic and, if the decline is severe or prolonged, a significant portion of such projects may become uneconomic. As producing or development projects become uneconomic, Benchmark's reserve estimates will be adjusted downward, which could negatively impact its borrowing base under its current revolving credit facility and its ability to fund operations.
Additionally, there is a risk that Benchmark will be required to write down the carrying value of its oil and natural gas properties when oil or natural gas prices are low or are declining, as occurred in 2020. In addition, non-cash write-downs may occur if it has:
•downward adjustments to its estimated proved reserves;
•increases in its estimates of development costs; or
•deterioration in its exploration and development results.
A write-down does not affect net cash flows from operating activities, liquidity or capital resources, but it does reduce the book value of net tangible assets, retained earnings and shareholders’ equity, and could lower the value of our common stock.
The oil and natural gas industry and the broader U.S. economy have experienced higher than expected inflationary pressures in recent years related to increases in oil and natural gas prices, continued supply chain disruptions, labor shortages and geopolitical instability, among other pressures. Should these conditions persist, it may impact our Energy Operations Business’ ability to procure services, materials and equipment on a cost-effective basis, or at all, and, as a result, our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows could be materially and adversely affected.
Inflation in the U.S. has become much more significant in recent years, and in 2022 it reached its highest levels in approximately 40 years. Throughout 2022 and 2023, energy companies experienced significant increases in the costs of certain oilfield services, materials and equipment, including diesel, steel, labor, trucking, sand, personnel and completion costs, among others, as a result of the recent increases in oil and natural gas prices, as well as availability constraints, supply chain disruptions, increased demand, labor shortages and wage inflation associated with a low U.S unemployment rate, inflation and other factors. These supply and demand fundamentals have been further aggravated by disruptions in global energy supply caused by multiple geopolitical events, including the ongoing military conflict between Russia and Ukraine and actions of U.S. and other governments and governmental organizations relating to Russia’s oil, natural gas and NGLs, including through sanctions, embargoes, import restrictions and commodity price caps. Our Energy Operations Business expects for the foreseeable future to experience supply chain constraints and inflationary pressure on its cost structure. Should oil and natural gas prices remain at their current levels or increase, our Energy Operations Business expects to be subject to additional service cost inflation in future periods, which may increase costs to drill, complete, equip and operate wells. In addition, supply chain disruptions and other inflationary pressures being experienced throughout the U.S. and global economy and in the oil and natural gas industry may limit our Energy Operations Business' ability to procure the necessary products and services needed for drilling, completing and producing wells in a timely and cost-effective manner, which could result in reduced margins and delays to its operations and could, in turn, have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
The hedging strategy of our Energy Operations Business may be ineffective in mitigating the impact of commodity price volatility on cash flows, which could adversely affect its financial condition.
Benchmark's hedging strategy is to enter into commodity derivative contracts covering a significant portion of its medium-term estimated hydrocarbon production. The prices at which it is able to enter into commodity derivative contracts covering
its production in the future will be dependent upon commodity futures prices at the time it enters into these transactions, which may be substantially higher or lower than current prices.
Benchmark's revolving credit facility prohibits it from entering into commodity derivative contracts with the purpose and effect of fixing prices covering all of its estimated future production, and we therefore retain the risk of a price decrease on Benchmark's volumes which we are precluded from securing with commodity derivative contracts. Furthermore, we may be unable to enter into additional commodity derivative contracts during favorable market conditions and, thus, may be unable to lock in attractive future prices for our product sales. Finally, the revolving credit facility and associated amendments may cause Benchmark to enter into commodity derivative contracts at inopportune times.
The hedging activities of our Energy Operations Business could result in cash losses and may limit the prices it would otherwise realize for production, which could reduce cash flows from operations.
Benchmark's hedging strategy may limit its ability to realize cash flows from commodity price increases. Many of its commodity derivative contracts requires Benchmark to make cash payments to the extent the applicable index exceeds a predetermined price, thereby limiting its ability to realize the benefit of increases in oil prices. If Benchmark's actual production and sales for any period are less than its hedged production and sales for that period (including reductions in production due to operational delays), Benchmark might be forced to satisfy all or a portion of its hedging obligations without the benefit of the cash flow from the sale of the underlying physical commodity, which may materially adversely impact its liquidity, financial condition and cash flows from operations.
The hedging transactions of our Energy Operations Business expose it to counterparty credit risk and involve other risks.
Benchmark's hedging transactions exposes it to risk of financial loss if a counterparty fails to perform under a commodity derivative contract. Disruptions in the financial markets could lead to a sudden decrease in a counterparty’s liquidity, which could impair its ability to perform under the terms of the commodity derivative contract and, accordingly, prevent Benchmark from realizing the benefit of the commodity derivative contract.
As a result of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and other legislation, hedging transactions and many of Benchmark's contract counterparties have come under increasing governmental oversight and regulations in recent years. Although we cannot predict the ultimate impact of these laws or other proposed laws and the related rulemaking, some of which is ongoing, existing or future regulations may adversely affect the cost and availability of Benchmark's hedging arrangements, including by causing its counterparties, which include lenders under its revolving credit facility, to curtail or cease their derivative activities.
Unless Benchmark replaces the oil and natural gas reserves it produces, its revenues and production will decline, which would adversely affect its cash flows from operations.
Producing oil and natural gas reservoirs are characterized by declining production rates that vary depending upon reservoir characteristics and other factors. The future oil and natural gas reserves and production and, therefore, cash flows from operations of our Energy Operations Business are highly dependent on its success in economically acquiring additional recoverable reserves and efficiently operating its current reserves. The production decline rates of our Energy Operations Business may be significantly higher than currently estimated if its wells do not produce as expected. Further, the decline rate may change when Benchmark makes acquisitions.
Producing oil and natural gas is a costly and high-risk activity with many uncertainties that could adversely affect our Energy Operations Business's activities, financial condition or results of operations.
The cost of operating oil and natural gas properties, is often uncertain, and cost and timing factors can adversely affect the economics of a well. The efforts of our Energy Operations Business may be uneconomical if its properties are productive but do not produce as much oil and natural gas as estimated. Furthermore, the operations of our Energy Operations Business may be curtailed, delayed or canceled as a result of other factors, including: high costs, shortages or delivery delays of equipment, labor or other services; unexpected operational events and conditions; adverse weather conditions and natural disasters; injection plant or other facility or equipment malfunctions and equipment failures or accidents; title disputes; unitization difficulties; pipe or cement failures, casing collapses or other downhole failures; compliance with environmental and other governmental requirements; lost or damaged oilfield service tools; unusual or unexpected geological formations and reservoir pressure; loss of injection fluid circulation; restrictions in access to, or disposal of,
water used or produced in oil and natural gas production; costs or delays imposed by or resulting from compliance with regulatory requirements; fires, blowouts, surface craterings, explosions and other hazards that could also result in personal injury and loss of life, pollution and suspension of operations; and uncontrollable flows of oil or well fluids.
If any of these factors were to occur with respect to a particular property, Benchmark could lose all or a part of its investment in the property, or it could fail to realize the expected benefits from the property, either of which could materially and adversely affect the financial condition or results of operations.
Estimated proved reserves and future production rates are based on many assumptions that may prove to be inaccurate. Any material inaccuracies in these reserve estimates or underlying assumptions will materially affect the quantities and present value of the estimated reserves of our Energy Operations Business.
It is not possible to measure underground accumulations of oil and natural gas in an exact way. Oil and natural gas reserve engineering is complex, requiring subjective estimates of underground accumulations of oil and natural gas and assumptions concerning future oil and natural gas prices, future production levels and operating and development costs. As a result, estimated quantities of proved reserves, projections of future production rates and the timing of development expenditures may prove inaccurate.
Any material inaccuracies in these reserve estimates or underlying assumptions will materially affect the quantities and present value of our reserves which could affect our Energy Operations Business's results of operations, financial condition and its ability to make distributions.
Any acquisitions completed by our Energy Operations Business are subject to substantial risks that could adversely affect financial conditions and results of operations.
One of the growth strategies of our Energy Operations Business is to capitalize on opportunistic acquisitions of oil and gas reserves. Our Energy Operations Business may not achieve the expected results of any acquisition it completes, and any adverse conditions or developments related to any such acquisition may have a negative impact on its operations and financial condition. Any acquisition involves potential risks, including, among other things: the validity of assumptions about estimated proved reserves, future production, commodity prices, revenues, operating expenses and costs; an inability to successfully integrate the assets it acquires; a decrease in liquidity by using a significant portion of available cash or borrowing capacity to finance acquisitions; a significant increase in interest expense or financial leverage if it incurs additional debt to finance acquisitions; the assumption of unknown liabilities, losses or costs for which it is not indemnified or for which its indemnity is inadequate; the diversion of management’s attention from other business concerns; an inability to hire, train or retain qualified personnel to manage and operate its growing assets; and the occurrence of other significant charges, such as the impairment of oil properties, goodwill or other intangible assets, asset devaluations or restructuring charges.
The decision to acquire a property will depend in part on the evaluation of data obtained from production reports and engineering studies, geophysical and geological analyses and seismic data and other information, the results of which are often inconclusive and subject to various interpretations.
Also, reviews of properties acquired from third parties may be incomplete because it generally is not feasible to perform an in-depth review of the individual properties involved in each acquisition, given the time constraints imposed by most sellers. Even a detailed review of the properties owned by third parties and the records associated with such properties may not reveal existing or potential problems, nor will such a review permit our Energy Operations Business to become sufficiently familiar with such properties to assess fully the deficiencies and potential issues associated with such properties. Our Energy Operations Business may not always be able to inspect every well on properties owned by third parties, and environmental problems, such as groundwater contamination, are not necessarily observable even when an inspection is undertaken.
Our Energy Operations Business is primarily dependent upon a small number of customers for production sales and may experience a temporary decline in revenues and production if it loses any of those customers.
The loss of customers by our Energy Operations Business could temporarily delay production and sales of oil and natural gas. If our Energy Operations Business were to lose any of its significant customers, we believe that it could identify substitute customers to purchase the impacted production volumes. However, if any of its customers dramatically
decreased or ceased purchasing oil from our Energy Operations Business, our Energy Operations Business may have difficulty receiving comparable rates for its production volumes.
In addition, a failure by any of these significant customers, or any purchasers of the production of our Energy Operations Business to perform their payment obligations to us could have a material adverse effect on the results of operations. To the extent that purchasers of production rely on access to the credit or equity markets to fund their operations, there could be an increased risk that those purchasers could default in their contractual obligations. If for any reason our Energy Operations Business was to determine that it was probable that some or all of the accounts receivable from any one or more of the purchasers of production were uncollectible, our Energy Operations Business would recognize a charge in the earnings of that period for the probable loss and could suffer a material reduction in liquidity and ability to make distributions.
Our Energy Operations Business might be unable to compete effectively with larger companies, which might adversely affect its business activities, financial condition and results of operations.
The oil and natural gas industry is intensely competitive, and our Energy Operations Business competes with companies that possess and employ financial, technical and personnel resources substantially greater than theirs. These companies may be able to pay more for properties and evaluate, bid for and purchase a greater number of properties than our Energy Operations Business's financial, technical or personnel resources permit. The ability of our Energy Operations Business to acquire additional properties in the future will depend on its ability to evaluate and select suitable properties and to consummate transactions in a highly competitive environment. Many of its larger competitors not only drill for and produce oil and natural gas but also carry on refining operations and market petroleum and other products on a regional, national or worldwide basis. In addition, there is substantial competition for investment capital in the oil and natural gas industry. These larger companies may have a greater ability to continue development activities despite a depressed oil price environment and to absorb the burden of present and future federal, state, local and other laws and regulations. The inability of our Energy Operations Business to compete effectively with larger companies could have a material adverse impact on its business activities, financial condition and results of operations.
Many of our Energy Operations Business's leases are in areas that have been partially depleted or drained by offset wells.
Many of our Energy Operations Business's leases are in areas that have already been partially depleted or drained by earlier offset drilling. The owners of leasehold interests lying contiguous or adjacent to or adjoining our interests could take actions, such as drilling additional wells, which could adversely affect the operations of our Energy Operations Business. When a new well is completed and produced, the pressure differential in the vicinity of the well causes the migration of reservoir fluids towards the new wellbore (and potentially away from existing wellbores). As a result, the drilling and production of these potential locations could cause a depletion of proved reserves, and may inhibit the ability to further develop our reserves.
Our Energy Operations Business's revolving credit facility has restrictions and financial covenants that may restrict its business and financing activities.
Our Energy Operations Business's revolving credit facility restricts, among other things, the ability to incur debt and pay distributions under certain circumstances, and requires it to comply with customary financial covenants and specified financial ratios. If market or other economic conditions deteriorate, the ability of our Energy Operations Business to comply with these covenants may be impaired. If our Energy Operations Business violates any provisions of its revolving credit facility that are not cured or waived within specific time periods, a significant portion of its indebtedness may become immediately due and payable, it could be prohibited from making distributions, and its lenders’ commitment to make further loans may terminate. Our Energy Operations Business might not have, or be able to obtain, sufficient funds to make these accelerated payments. In addition, the obligations of our Energy Operations Business under its revolving credit facility are secured by substantially all of its assets, and if it is unable to repay our indebtedness under the revolving credit facility, the lenders could seek to foreclose on its assets. Further, the terms of our credit agreement require the pre-approval of our lenders in order to reinstate distributions on our common units.
The total amount our Energy Operations Business is able to borrow under its revolving credit facility is limited by a borrowing base, which is primarily based on the estimated value of its oil and natural gas properties and its commodity derivative contracts, as determined by its lenders in their sole discretion. The borrowing base is subject to redetermination on a semi-annual basis and more frequent redetermination in certain circumstances. If its lenders were to decrease the borrowing base to a level below the then outstanding borrowings, the amount exceeding the revised borrowing base could
become immediately due and payable. The negative redetermination of the borrowing base could adversely affect our Energy Operations Business's business, results of operations, financial condition and the ability to make distributions. Furthermore, in the future, our Energy Operations Business may be unable to access sufficient capital under its revolving credit facility as a result of any decrease in the borrowing base.
The operations of our Energy Operations Business are subject to operational hazards and unforeseen interruptions for which it may not be adequately insured.
There are a variety of operating risks inherent in the production of oil and natural gas properties, such as leaks, explosions, mechanical problems and natural disasters, all of which could cause substantial financial losses. Any of these or other similar occurrences could result in the disruption of operations, substantial repair costs, personal injury or loss of human life, significant damage to property, environmental pollution, impairment of operations and substantial revenue losses. The location of our Energy Operations Business's wells and other facilities near populated areas, including residential areas, commercial business centers and industrial sites, could significantly increase the level of damages resulting from these risks.
Insurance against all operational risks is not available. Our Energy Operations Business is not fully insured against all risks, including development and completion risks that are generally not recoverable from third parties or insurance. In addition, pollution and environmental risks generally are not fully insurable. Additionally, our Energy Operations Business may elect not to obtain insurance if it believes that the cost of available insurance is excessive relative to the perceived risks presented. Losses could, therefore, occur for uninsurable or uninsured risks or in amounts in excess of existing insurance coverage. Moreover, insurance may not be available in the future at commercially reasonable costs and on commercially reasonable terms. Changes in the insurance markets due to weather and adverse economic conditions have made it more difficult to obtain certain types of coverage. As a result, our Energy Operations Business may not be able to obtain the levels or types of insurance it would otherwise have obtained prior to these market changes, and we cannot be sure the insurance coverage it does obtain will not contain large deductibles or fail to cover certain hazards or cover all potential losses. Losses and liabilities from uninsured and under-insured events and delay in the payment of insurance proceeds could have a material adverse effect on the business, financial condition, results of operations and ability of our Energy Operations Business to make distributions.
Our Energy Operations Business depends in part on transportation, pipelines and refining facilities owned by others. Any limitation in the availability of those facilities could interfere with an ability to market production and could harm its business.
The marketability of production depends in part on the availability, proximity and capacity of pipelines, tanker trucks and other transportation methods and refining facilities owned by third parties. The amount of oil that can be produced and sold is subject to curtailment in certain circumstances, such as pipeline interruptions due to scheduled and unscheduled maintenance, excessive pressure, physical damage or lack of available capacity on such systems, tanker truck availability and extreme weather conditions. Also, the shipment of oil on third party pipelines may be curtailed or delayed if it does not meet the quality specifications of the pipeline owners. The curtailments arising from these and similar circumstances may last from a few days to several months. In many cases, our Energy Operations Business is provided only with limited, if any, notice as to when these circumstances will arise and their duration. Any significant curtailment in gathering system or transportation or refining facility capacity could reduce the ability to market oil production and harm our Energy Operations Business. Access to transportation options and the prices our Energy Operations Business receives for production can also be affected by federal and state regulation, including regulation of oil production and transportation, and pipeline safety, as well by general economic conditions and changes in supply and demand. In addition, the third parties on whom our Energy Operations Business relies for transportation services are subject to complex federal, state, tribal and local laws that could adversely affect the cost, manner or feasibility of conducting business.
Climate change legislation, regulatory initiatives and litigation could result in increased operating costs and reduced demand for the oil and natural gas that our Energy Operations Business produces.
We believe it is likely that scientific and political attention to issues concerning the extent, causes of and responsibility for climate change will continue, with the potential for further regulations and litigation that could affect the operations of our Energy Operations Business. Our Energy Operations Business operations result in greenhouse gas (“GHG”) emissions. In December 2009, the Environmental Protection Agency (the “EPA”) published its findings that emissions of carbon dioxide, methane and other GHG present a danger to public health and the environment. Based on these findings, the EPA began adopting and implementing regulations that restrict emissions of GHG under existing provisions of the federal Clean Air
Act (“CAA”), including requirements to reduce emissions of GHG from motor vehicles, requirements associated with certain construction and operating permit reviews for GHG emissions from certain large stationary sources, reporting requirements for GHG emissions from specified large GHG emission sources, including certain owners and operators of onshore oil and natural gas production and rules requiring so-called “green completions” of natural gas wells constructed after January 2015. Our Energy Operations Business currently monitors GHG emissions from operations in accordance with the GHG emissions reporting rule. Data collected from our GHG monitoring activities to date indicate that our Energy Operations Business does not exceed the threshold level of GHG emissions triggering a reporting obligation. To the extent it exceeds the applicable regulatory threshold level in the future, our Energy Operations Business will report the emissions beginning in the applicable period. Also, the U.S. Congress has, from time to time, considered legislation to reduce emissions of GHG, and almost one-half of the states, either individually or through multi-state regional initiatives, have begun implementing legal measures to reduce emissions of GHG. On August 16, 2022, the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 (“IRA”) created the Methane Emissions Reduction Program to incentivize methane emission reductions and, for the first time ever, impose a fee on GHG emissions from certain facilities that exceed specified emissions levels. Further, on November 11, 2022, the EPA issued a supplemental notice of proposed rulemaking on methane and GHG emissions from new and existing sources in the oil and natural gas industry. On December 2, 2023, the EPA issued a prepublication version of a final rule to reduce methane and volatile organic chemicals emissions from the oil and natural gas sector, which strengthens and expands the EPA’s November 1, 2021 proposed revisions to the New Source Performance Standards program established under Section 111 of the CAA and creates new emissions restrictions for existing sources as well. On November 17, 2023, the EPA issued a final rule that enables states to implement more stringent methane emissions standards than the federal guidelines require. In addition, under the Paris Agreement, which went into effect on November 4, 2016, countries are required to establish increasingly stringent nationally determined contributions (“NDC”), which set GHG emission reduction goals, every five years beginning in 2020 to mitigate climate change. The United States exited the Paris Agreement in November 2020 but rejoined the agreement effective February 19, 2021. In April 2021, the United States made its NDC submittal, setting a goal to achieve a 50 to 52% reduction from 2005 levels in economy-wide net greenhouse gas pollution in 2030. Further, in November 2021, the United States and other countries entered into the Glasgow Climate Pact, which includes a range of measures designed to address climate change, including but not limited to the phase-out of fossil fuel subsidies, reducing methane emissions 30% by 2030, and cooperating toward the advancement of the development of alternative sources of energy.
The adoption and implementation of any legislation or regulations to reduce GHG emissions or imposing additional GHG reporting obligations could require our Energy Operations Business to incur significant costs to reduce emissions of GHG associated with operations. Any such legislation or regulatory programs could also increase the cost of consuming, and thereby reduce demand for, the oil and natural gas produced by our Energy Operations Business. Consequently, legislation and regulatory programs to reduce emissions of GHGs could have a material adverse effect on our Energy Operations Business. Reduced demand for the oil and natural gas that it produces could also have the effect of lowering the value of its reserves. In addition, there have also been efforts in recent years to influence the investment community, including investment advisors, investment fund managers and certain family foundations, universities, individual investors and sovereign wealth, pension and endowment funds, promoting divestment of, or limit investment in, fossil fuel equities and pressuring lenders to limit or stop funding to companies engaged in the extraction of fossil fuel reserves. Such environmental activism and initiatives aimed at limiting climate change and reducing air pollution could interfere with the business activities, operations and ability to access capital by or of our Energy Operations Business.
Finally, increasing attention to the risks of climate change has resulted in an increased possibility of lawsuits or investigations brought by public and private entities against companies engaged in oil and natural gas production in connection with their GHG emissions. Should we be targeted by any such litigation or investigations, we may incur liability, which, to the extent that societal pressures or political or other factors are involved, could be imposed without regard to the causation of or contribution to the asserted damage, or to other mitigating factors. The ultimate impact of GHG agreements, legislation and measures on our financial performance is highly uncertain because we are unable to predict, for a multitude of individual jurisdictions, the outcome of political decision-making processes and the variables and trade-offs that inevitably occur in connection with such processes.
In an interpretative guidance on climate change disclosures, the SEC indicated that climate change could have an effect on the severity of weather (including hurricanes, droughts and floods), sea levels, the arability of farmland and water availability and quality. If such effects were to occur, there is the potential for our Energy Operations Business's exploration and production operations to be adversely affected. Potential adverse effects could include damages to facilities, or to transportation, pipeline and refinery owned by others on which its operations depend, from powerful winds or rising waters in low-lying areas, disruption of production, less efficient or non-routine operating practices necessitated by climate effects and increased costs for insurance coverage in the aftermath of such effects. Any future exploration and
development activities and equipment could also be adversely affected by severe weather conditions such as hurricanes or freezing temperatures, which may cause a loss of production from temporary cessation of activity from regional power outages or lost or damaged facilities and equipment. Such severe weather conditions could also impact access to drilling and production facilities for routine operations, maintenance and repairs and the availability of and access to, necessary third-party services, such as gathering, processing, compression and transportation services. These constraints and the resulting shortages or high costs could delay or temporarily halt our Energy Operations Business's operations and materially increase its operation and capital costs, which could have a material adverse effect on its business, financial condition and results of operations. Significant physical effects of climate change could also have an indirect effect on the financing and operations of our Energy Operations Business by disrupting the transportation or process-related services provided by it or other midstream companies, service companies or suppliers with whom it has a business relationship. Our Energy Operations Business may not be able to recover through insurance some or any of the damages, losses or costs that may result from potential physical effects of climate change.
Regulation in response to seismic activity could increase our operating and compliance costs.
Recent earthquakes in northern and central Oklahoma and elsewhere have prompted concerns about seismic activity and possible relationships with the energy industry, in particular a possible connection between the operation of injection wells used for produced water disposal and the increased occurrence of seismic activity. Legislative and regulatory initiatives intended to address these concerns may result in additional levels of regulation that could lead to operational delays, increases in operating and compliance costs or other adverse affects to the operations or Energy Operations Business. To date, these regulations have not adversely impacted such operations.
The adoption and implementation of any new laws, rules, regulations, requests, or directives that restrict the ability to dispose of water, including by plugging back the depths of disposal wells, reducing the volume of oil and natural gas wastewater disposed in such wells, restricting disposal well locations, or by requiring the shut-down of disposal wells, could have a material adverse effect on the ability of our Energy Operations Business to produce oil and natural gas economically, or at all, and accordingly, could materially and adversely affect the business, financial condition and results of operations of our Energy Operations Business.
Rules regulating air emissions from oil and natural gas operations could result in increased capital expenditures and operating costs of our Energy Operations Business.
In recent years, the EPA issued final rules to subject oil and natural gas operations to regulation under the New Source Performance Standards (“NSPS”) and National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (“NESHAP”) programs under the CAA and to impose new and amended requirements under both programs. The EPA rules include NSPS standards for completions of hydraulically fractured oil and natural gas wells, compressors, controllers, dehydrators, storage tanks, natural gas processing plants and certain other equipment. These rules have required changes to our operations, including the installation of new equipment to control emissions. In January 2023, the EPA announced a proposed consent decree that, if finalized as proposed, would establish a December 10, 2024 deadline for the EPA to review and propose revisions to the NESHAP for oil and natural gas production facilities and natural gas transmission and storage facilities, which may require us to make additional changes to our operations. In December 2023, the EPA issued final NSPS updates and emission guidelines to reduce methane and other pollutants from the oil and gas industry. In addition, several states are pursuing similar measures to regulate emissions of methane from new and existing sources within the oil and natural gas source category. As a result of this continued regulatory focus, future federal and state regulations of the oil and natural gas industry remain a possibility. Compliance with existing or new air emission requirements could increase costs of development and production, though we do not expect these requirements to be any more burdensome to our Energy Operations Business than to other similarly situated companies involved in oil and natural gas exploration and production activities.
Our Energy Operations Business's operations are subject to environmental and operational safety laws and regulations that may expose it to significant costs and liabilities.
Our Energy Operations Business may incur significant costs and liabilities as a result of environmental and safety requirements applicable to oil and natural gas development and production activities. These costs and liabilities could arise under a wide range of federal, state, tribal and local environmental and safety laws and regulations, including regulations and enforcement policies, which have tended to become increasingly strict over time. Failure to comply with these laws and regulations may result in the assessment of administrative, civil and criminal penalties, imposition of cleanup and site restoration costs and liens, liability for natural resource damages, and to a lesser extent, issuance of injunctions to limit or
cease operations. In addition, our Energy Operations Business may experience delays in obtaining or be unable to obtain required permits, which may delay or interrupt operations and limit growth and revenue. Claims for damages to persons or property from private parties and governmental authorities may result from environmental and other impacts of operations.
Strict, joint and several liabilities may be imposed under certain environmental laws, which could cause our Energy Operations Business to become liable for the conduct of others or for consequences of its own actions that were in compliance with all applicable laws at the time those actions were taken. New laws, regulations or enforcement policies could be more stringent and impose unforeseen liabilities or significantly increase compliance costs. If our Energy Operations Business is not able to recover the resulting costs through insurance or increased revenues, its ability to make cash distributions.
Other Risks Related to our Industrial Operations Business
Our Industrial Operations Business relies, or may rely in the future, on its intellectual property and licenses to use others’ intellectual property for competitive advantage. If our Industrial Operations Business is unable to protect its intellectual property or obtain or retain licenses to use other’s intellectual property, or if it infringes upon or are alleged to have infringed upon others’ intellectual property, it could have a material adverse effect on our Industrial Operations Business's financial condition, business and results of operations.
Our Industrial Operations Business's success depend in part on its, or licenses to use others’, brand names, proprietary technology and manufacturing techniques. It relies on a combination of patents, trademarks, copyrights, trade secrets, confidentiality procedures and contractual provisions to protect these intellectual property rights. The steps they have taken to protect their intellectual property rights may not prevent third parties from using their intellectual property and other proprietary information without their authorization or independently developing intellectual property and other proprietary information that is similar. In addition, the laws of foreign countries may not protect our businesses’ intellectual property rights effectively or to the same extent as the laws of the United States.
Stopping unauthorized use of our Industrial Operations Business's proprietary information and intellectual property and defending claims that it has made unauthorized use of others’ proprietary information or intellectual property, may be difficult, time consuming, and costly. The use of intellectual property and other proprietary information by others could reduce or eliminate any competitive advantage our Industrial Operations Business has developed, cause it to lose sales or otherwise harm its business.
Our Industrial Operations Business may become involved in legal proceedings and claims in the future either to protect its intellectual property or to defend allegations that it infringed upon others’ intellectual property rights. These claims and any resulting litigation could subject our Industrial Operations Business to significant liability for damages and invalidate its property rights. In addition, these lawsuits, regardless of their merits, could be time consuming and expensive to resolve and could divert management’s time and attention. The costs associated with any of these actions could be substantial and could have a material adverse effect on our Industrial Operations Business's financial condition, business, and results of operations.
Our Industrial Operations Business's inability to develop new products and enhance existing products to meet customer product requirements on a cost competitive basis may negatively impact its results of operations.
The future results of operations of our Industrial Operations Business may be adversely affected if it is unable to continue to develop, manufacture and market products that are reliable, competitive, and meet customers’ needs. The markets for matrix printers, associated supplies and software are aggressively competitive, especially with respect to pricing and the introduction of new technologies and products offering improved features and functionality. In addition, the introduction of any significant new and/or disruptive technology or business model by a competitor that substantially changes the markets into which our Industrial Operations Business sells its products or demand for the products it sells could severely impact sales of their products and our results of operations. The impact of competitive activities on the sales volumes or our revenue, or our inability to effectively deal with these competitive issues, could have a material adverse effect on our ability to attract and retain customers and maintain or grow market share. The competitive pressure to develop technology and products and to increase investment in research and development and marketing expenditures also could cause significant changes in the level of the operating expenses of our Industrial Operations Business.
Our Industrial Operations is dependent on a limited number of customers to derive a large portion of its revenue, and the loss of one of these customers may adversely affect its financial condition, business and results of operations.
Printronix derives a significant amount of revenue from a concentrated number of retailers, distributors, and manufacturers. Any negative change involving these retailers, distributors, and manufacturers, including industry consolidation, store closings, reduction in purchasing levels or bankruptcies, could negatively impact the sales of Printronix and may have a material adverse effect on our Industrial Operations Business's results of operations, financial condition, and cash flows.
Our Industrial Operations Business has limited suppliers for key product components and services and any interruption in supply could impair its ability to make and deliver its signature products, adversely affecting its business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Outsourced providers and component suppliers have played, and will continue to play, a key role in Printronix’s manufacturing operations, field installation and support, and many of its transactional and administrative functions, such as information technology, facilities management, and certain elements of its finance organization. These providers and suppliers might suffer financial setbacks, be acquired by third parties, become subject to exclusivity arrangements that preclude further business with our Industrial Operations Business or be unable to meet its requirements or expectation due to independent business decisions, or force majeure events that could interrupt or impair its continued ability to perform as we expect.
Although our Industrial Operations Business may attempt to select reputable providers and suppliers and attempt to secure its performance on terms documented in written contracts, it is possible that one or more of these providers or suppliers could fail to perform as we expect, or fail to secure or protect intellectual property rights, and such failure could have an adverse impact on our Industrial Operations Business. In some cases, the requirements of Industrial Operations Business's business mandate that it obtain certain components and sub-assemblies included in its products from a single supplier or a limited group of suppliers. Where practical, our Industrial Operations Business endeavors to establish alternative sources to mitigate the risk that the failure of any single provider or supplier will adversely affect its business, but this is not feasible in all circumstances. There is therefore a risk that a prolonged inability to obtain certain components or secure key services could impair our Industrial Operations Business's ability to manage operations, ship products and generate revenues, which could adversely affect its results of operations and damage its customer relationships.
Failure of our Industrial Operations Business to manage inventory levels or production capacity may negatively impact its results of operations.
Printronix’s financial performance depends in part upon its ability to successfully forecast the timing and extent of customer demand and reseller demand to manage worldwide distribution and inventory levels. Unexpected fluctuations in customer demand or in reseller inventory levels could disrupt ordering patterns and may adversely affect its financial results, inventory levels and cash flows. In addition, the financial failure or loss of a key customer, reseller or supplier could have a material adverse impact on its financial results. Our Industrial Operations Business must also address production and supply constraints, including product disruptions caused by quality issues, and delays or disruptions in the supply of key components necessary for production. Such delays, disruptions or shortages may result in lost revenue or in additional costs to meet customer demand. Our Industrial Operations Business's future results of operations and ability to effectively grow or maintain market share may be adversely affected if it is unable to address these issues on a timely basis.
Decreased consumption of supplies could negatively impact the results of operations of certain of our Industrial Operations Business.
Printronix expects approximately 58.0% of its revenue for its fiscal year ending March 31, 2024 will be derived from the sale of supplies. Printronix's future results of operations may be adversely affected if the consumption of its supplies by end users of its products is lower than expected or declines, if there are declines in pricing, unfavorable mix and/or increased costs. Further, changes of printing behavior driven by adoption of electronic processes and/or use of mobile devices such as tablets and smart phones by businesses could result in a reduction in printing, which could adversely impact consumption of supplies.
Due to the international nature of our Industrial Operations Business, changes in a country’s or region’s political or economic conditions or other factors could negatively impact its results of operations.
We expect revenue derived from international sales by our Industrial Operations Business will comprise approximately 63.0% of Printronix’s revenue for its fiscal year ending March 31, 2024. Accordingly, Printronix’s future results could be adversely affected by a variety of factors, including changes in a specific country’s or region’s political or economic conditions; foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations; conflict and war; trade protection measures; local labor regulations; import, export or other licensing requirements; requirements related to making foreign direct investments; and unexpected changes in legal or regulatory requirements. As an example, in addition to indirectly raising transportation costs of the raw materials Printronix uses to manufacture its products, the invasion of Ukraine by Russia in March 2022 required Printronix to adapt its operations and require its customers in the region to pre-pay expenses such that Printronix can avoid accruing accounts receivable. The duration and magnitude of the impacts of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine on Printronix’s business remain uncertain, and we will continue to monitor the situation and adapt our operations accordingly.
In addition, changes in tax laws and the ability to repatriate cash accumulated outside the United States in a tax efficient manner may adversely affect Printronix’s financial results, investment flexibility and operations. Moreover, margins on international sales tend to be lower than those on domestic sales, and we believe international operations in emerging geographic markets will be less profitable than operations in the U.S. and European markets, in part, because of the higher investment levels for marketing, selling and distribution required to enter these markets.
In many foreign countries, particularly those with developing economies, it is common for local business practices to be prohibited by laws and regulations applicable to Printronix, such as employment laws, fair trade laws or the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. Although Printronix implements policies and procedures designed to ensure compliance with these laws, its employees, contractors and agents, as well as those business partners to which Printronix outsources certain business operations, may take actions in violation of these policies. Any such violation, even if prohibited by its policies, could have a material adverse effect on our Industrial Operations Business and reputation. Because of the challenges in managing a geographically dispersed workforce, there also may be additional opportunities for employees to commit fraud or personally engage in practices which violate the policies and procedures of our Industrial Operations Business.
Risks Related to our Common Stock
Our quarterly performance may be volatile, which in turn may adversely affect the trading price of our common stock.
Due to the nature of our intellectual property business and reliance on our operating businesses on intellectual property, legal expenses associated with acquisitions, uncertainties regarding the amount and timing of our receipt of license and other fees from potential infringers, stemming primarily from uncertainties regarding the outcome of enforcement actions, rates of adoption of our patented technologies, the growth rates of our existing licensees, and certain other factors, our revenues may vary significantly from quarter to quarter and period to period, which could make our business difficult to manage, adversely affect our business and results of operations, and cause our quarterly and periodic results to fall below market expectations. As a result of these factors, quarter-to-quarter comparisons of our financial results, especially in the short term, may have limited utility as an indicator of future performance. Significant variation in our quarterly performance, compounded by the thin trading volume of our common stock, could significantly and adversely affect the trading price of our common stock.
Future sales of our common stock could reduce the market price of our common stock.
In the future, we may issue securities to raise cash for operations and patent portfolio investments, or pay for interests in additional subsidiary companies by using shares of our common stock or a combination of cash and shares of our common stock. We may also issue securities convertible into our common stock. Any of these events may dilute stockholders’ ownership interests in our company and have an adverse impact on the price of our common stock.
Sales of a substantial amount of our common stock in the public market, or the perception that these sales may occur, could reduce the market price of our common stock. This could also impair our ability to raise additional capital through the sale of our securities.
Delaware law and our charter documents contain provisions that could discourage or prevent a potential takeover of our company that might otherwise result in our stockholders receiving a premium over the market price of their shares.
Provisions of Delaware law and our certificate of incorporation and bylaws could make the acquisition of our company by means of a tender offer, proxy contest or otherwise, and the removal of incumbent officers and directors, more difficult. These provisions include:
•Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, which prohibits a merger with a 15%-or-greater stockholder, such as a party that has completed a successful tender offer, until three years after that party became a 15%-or-greater stockholder;
•the authorization in our certificate of incorporation of undesignated preferred stock, which could be issued without stockholder approval in a manner designed to prevent or discourage a takeover; and
•the general restriction in our certificate of incorporation on any direct or indirect transfers of our common stock if the effect would be to (i) increase the direct or indirect ownership of our common stock by any person or group from less than 4.899% to 4.899% or more of our common stock; or (ii) increase the percentage of our common stock owned directly or indirectly by a person or group owning or deemed to own 4.899% or more of our common stock.
Together, these provisions may make the removal of management more difficult and may discourage transactions that could otherwise involve payment of a premium over prevailing market prices for our common stock.
In addition, Starboard beneficially owns 61,123,595 shares of our common stock as of March 11, 2024, representing approximately 61.2% of our common stock, based on 99,895,473 shares of common stock issued and outstanding as of such date. As a result, Starboard and its affiliates are able to determine the outcome of all matters requiring stockholder approval and are able to cause or prevent a change of control of our Company or a change in the composition of our Board and could preclude any acquisition of our Company.
We do not currently intend to pay dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future, and consequently, your ability to achieve a return on your investment will depend on appreciation in the price of our common stock.
We do not anticipate paying any cash dividends to holders of our common stock in the foreseeable future. Consequently, investors must rely on sales of their common stock after price appreciation, which may never occur, as the only way to realize any future gains on their investments. There is no guarantee that shares of our common stock will appreciate in value or even maintain the price at which our stockholders have purchased their shares.
Starboard's sale of Company securities may adversely affect the market price of our common stock.
On February 14, 2023, we entered into an amended and restated registration rights agreement (the “Registration Rights Agreement”) with Starboard and certain of its affiliates, as contemplated by the Recapitalization Agreement (as described in Note 10 to the accompanying consolidated financial statements). The Registration Rights Agreement provides Starboard and such affiliates with rights to require that the Company file a registration statement in certain circumstances. These registrations may facilitate the resale of such securities into the public market, and any such resale would increase the number of shares of our common stock available for public trading. Sales by Starboard of a substantial number of shares of our common stock in the public market, or the perception that such sales might occur, could have a material adverse effect on the price of our common stock.
We agreed to certain Governance Provisions with Starboard.
Under the Recapitalization Agreement, we agreed with Starboard that for a period from the date of the Recapitalization Agreement until May 12, 2026 (the “Applicable Period”), the Board will include at least two directors that are independent of, and not affiliates (as defined in Rule 144 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended) of, Starboard, with current Board members Maureen O’Connell and Isaac T. Kohlberg satisfying this initial condition. We and Starboard also agreed that Katharine Wolanyk will continue to serve as a director of the Company until at least May 12, 2024 (or such earlier date if Ms. Wolanyk is unwilling or unable to serve as a director for any reason or resigns as a director). Additionally, within five business days following the date of the Recapitalization Agreement, the Company appointed Gavin Molinelli as a Board member and as Chair of the Board. The Company and Starboard also agreed that, following the closing of the Series B
Warrants Exercise until the end of the Applicable Period, the number of directors serving on the Board will not exceed 10 members.

---

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
None.

---

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
Corporate
Our principal executive office is located in New York, New York, where we lease approximately 8,600 square feet of office space, under a lease agreement that expires in 2027. We also have an office for operational and administrative functions located in Irvine, California, where we lease approximately 8,293 square feet of office space, under a lease agreement that expires in 2024. We believe that our facilities are adequate, suitable and of sufficient capacity to support our immediate needs. Refer to Note 13 to the consolidated financial statements elsewhere herein for additional information.
Intellectual Property Operations
Our Patent Licensing, Enforcement and Technologies Business, is based in Frisco, Texas, where we lease office space under a lease agreement that expires in 2024. One additional subsidiary leases office space in Austin, Texas that also expires in 2024. We believe that our Patent Licensing, Enforcement and Technologies Business's facilities are adequate, suitable and of sufficient capacity to support its immediate needs.
Industrial Operations
Printronix conducts its foreign and domestic operations using leased facilities under non-cancelable operating leases that expire at various dates through 2028. Printronix's principal executive office is located in Irvine, California, under a lease agreement that expires in 2026. Printronix has a manufacturing site located in Malaysia and third-party configuration sites
located in the United States, Singapore and Holland, along with sales and support locations around the world to support its global network of users, channel partners and strategic alliances. We believe that Printronix's facilities are adequate, suitable and of sufficient capacity to support its immediate needs. Refer to Note 13 to the consolidated financial statements elsewhere herein for additional information.
Energy Operations
Benchmark is based in Austin, Texas, and has assets of over 13,000 net acres primarily located in Roberts and Hemphill Counties in Texas, and an interest in over 125 wells, the majority of which are operated. We believe that our energy operations' facilities are adequate, suitable and of sufficient capacity to support its immediate needs.

---

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
In the ordinary course of business, we or our various businesses and operations are the subject of, or party to, various pending or threatened legal actions, including various counterclaims in connection with patent enforcement activities. We believe that any liability arising from these actions will not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows. For information regarding certain pending litigation, see Note 13 to our consolidated financial statements.
Intellectual Property Operations
Our Intellectual Property Operations Business is often required to engage in litigation to enforce its patents and patent rights. Certain of its operating subsidiaries are parties to ongoing patent enforcement related litigation, alleging infringement by third-parties of certain of the patented technologies owned or controlled by its operating subsidiaries.
In connection with any of its patent enforcement actions, it is possible that a defendant may claim and/or a court may rule that our Intellectual Property Operations Business has violated statutory authority, regulatory authority, federal rules, local court rules, or governing standards relating to the substantive or procedural aspects of such enforcement actions. In such event, a court may issue monetary sanctions against it or its operating subsidiaries or award attorney’s fees and/or expenses to a defendant(s), which could be material, and if required to be paid by it or its operating subsidiaries, could materially harm its operating results and its financial position.
Our Intellectual Property Operations Business spends a significant amount of its financial and management resources to pursue its current litigation matters. These litigation matters and others that it may in the future determine to pursue could continue for years and continue to consume significant financial and management resources. The counterparties to its litigation matters are sometimes large, well-financed companies with substantially greater resources. We cannot assure you that any of our Intellectual Property Operations Business current or future litigation matters will result in a favorable outcome for it. In addition, in part due to the appeals process and other legal processes, even if our Intellectual Property Operations Business obtains favorable interim rulings or verdicts in particular litigation matters, they may not be predictive of the ultimate resolution of the dispute. Also, we cannot assure you that our Intellectual Property Operations Business will not be exposed to claims or sanctions against it which may be costly or impossible for it to defend. Unfavorable or adverse outcomes may result in losses, exhaustion of financial resources or other adverse effects which could encumber our Intellectual Property Operations Business’s ability to effectively and efficiently monetize its assets. Refer to Note 13 to the consolidated financial statements elsewhere herein for additional information related to current legal proceedings.

---

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURE
ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
None.
PART II

---

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
Market Information
Our common stock trades on The Nasdaq Global Select Market under the symbol “ACTG.”
Holders of Common Stock
On March 11, 2024, there were 63 owners of record of our common stock. The foregoing does not include the number of shareholders whose shares are nominally held by banks, brokerage houses or other institutions, but includes each such institution as one record holder.
Dividend Policy
The current policy of our board of directors is to retain earnings, if any, to provide for our growth. Consequently, we do not expect to pay any cash dividends in the foreseeable future. Further, there can be no assurance that our proposed operations will generate revenues and cash flow needed to declare any future cash dividends or that we will have legally available funds to pay future dividends.
Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans
Information required by this item is incorporated by reference to our Definitive Proxy Statement for our 2024 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities
None.
Stock Repurchases
There were no stock repurchases during the quarter ended December 31, 2023.
On November 9, 2023, the Board of Directors of the Company approved a stock repurchase program authorizing the Company to purchase up to an aggregate of $20 million of the Company’s common stock subject, to a cap of 5,800,000 shares of common stock. The repurchase authorization has no time limit and does not require the repurchase of a minimum number of shares. The common stock may be repurchased on the open market, in block trades, or in privately negotiated transactions, including under plans complying with the provisions of Rule 10b5-1 and Rule 10b-18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. As of December 31, 2023, the remaining availability under the stock repurchase program was $20 million.
Refer to Note 14 to the consolidated financial statements elsewhere herein for additional information related to past repurchase programs.

---

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
ITEM 6. [Reserved]
Not applicable.

---

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report. This discussion contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these “forward-looking statements” as a result of various factors including the risks we discuss in Item 1A “Risk Factors,” and elsewhere herein. For additional information, refer to the section above entitled “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements.”
General
We are focused on acquiring and managing companies across industries - including but not limited to the industrial, energy, technology, and healthcare verticals. We focus on identifying, pursuing and acquiring businesses where we are uniquely positioned to deploy our differentiated strategy, people and processes to generate and compound shareholder value. We have a wide range of transactional and operational capabilities to realize the intrinsic value in the businesses that we acquire. Our ideal transactions include the acquisition of public or private companies, the acquisition of divisions of other companies, or structured transactions that can result in the recapitalization or restructuring of the ownership of a business to enhance value.
We are particularly attracted to complex situations where we believe value is not fully recognized, the value of certain operations are masked by a diversified business mix, or where private ownership has not invested the capital and/or resources necessary to support long-term value. Through our public market activities, we aim to initiate strategic block positions in public companies as a path to complete whole company acquisitions or strategic transactions that unlock value. We believe this business model is differentiated from private equity funds, which do not typically own public securities prior to acquiring companies, hedge funds, which do not typically acquire entire businesses, and other acquisition vehicles such Special Purpose Acquisition Companies, which are narrowly focused on completing one singular, defining acquisition.
Our focus is companies with market values in the sub-$2 billion range and particularly on businesses valued at $1billion or less. We are, however, opportunistic, and may pursue acquisitions that are larger under the right circumstance.
We believe the Company has the potential to develop advantaged opportunities due to its:
•disciplined focus on identifying opportunities where the Company can be an advantaged buyer, initiate a transaction opportunity spontaneously, avoid a traditional sale process and complete the purchase of a business, division or other asset at an attractive price;
•willingness to invest across industries and in off-the-run, often misunderstood assets that suffer from a complexity discount;
•relationships and partnership abilities across functions and sectors; and
•strong expertise in corporate governance and operational transformation
Our long-term focus positions our businesses to navigate economic cycles and allows sellers and other counterparties to have confidence that a transaction is not dependent on achieving the types of performance hurdles demanded by private equity sponsors. We consider opportunities based on the attractiveness of the underlying cash flows, without regard to a specific fund life or investment horizon.
People, Process and Performance
Our Company is built on the principles of People, Process and Performance. We have built a management team with demonstrated expertise in Research, Transactions and Execution, and Operations and Management of our targeted acquisitions. We believe our priorities and skills underpin a compelling value proposition for operating businesses, partners and future acquisition targets, including:
•the flexibility to consummate transactions using financing structures suited to the opportunity and involving third-party transaction structuring as needed;
•the ability to deliver ongoing financial and strategic support; and
•the financial capacity to maintain a long-term outlook and remain committed to a multi-year business plan.
Relationship with Starboard Value, LP
Our strategic relationship with Starboard provides us access to industry expertise, and operating partners and industry experts to evaluate potential acquisition opportunities and enhance the oversight and value creation of such businesses once acquired. Starboard has provided, and we expect will continue to provide, ready access to its extensive network of industry executives and, as part of our relationship, Starboard has assisted, and we expect will continue to assist, with sourcing and evaluating appropriate acquisition opportunities.
Intellectual Property Operations
The Company through its Patent Licensing, Enforcement and Technologies Business invests in IP and related absolute return assets and engage in the licensing and enforcement of patented technologies. Through our Patent Licensing, Enforcement and Technologies Business, operated under our wholly owned subsidiary, Acacia Research Group, LLC, and its wholly-owned subsidiaries (collectively, “ARG”), we are a principal in the licensing and enforcement of patent portfolios, with our operating subsidiaries obtaining the rights in the patent portfolio or purchasing the patent portfolio outright. While we, from time to time, partner with inventors and patent owners, from small entities to large corporations, we assume all responsibility for advancing operational expenses while pursuing a patent licensing and enforcement program, and when applicable, share net licensing revenue with our patent partners as that program matures, on a pre-arranged and negotiated basis. We may also provide upfront capital to patent owners as an advance against future licensing revenue.
Currently, on a consolidated basis, our operating subsidiaries own or control the rights to multiple patent portfolios, which include U.S. patents and certain foreign counterparts, covering technologies used in a variety of industries. We generate revenues and related cash flows from the granting of IP rights for the use of patented technologies that our operating subsidiaries control or own.
We have established a proven track record of licensing and enforcement success with over 1,600 license agreements executed as of December 31, 2023, across nearly 200 patent portfolio licensing and enforcement programs. As of December 31, 2023, we have generated gross licensing revenue of approximately $1.8 billion, and have returned $865.2 million to our patent partners. During the past five calendar years ending on December 31, 2023, we generated gross licensing revenue of approximately $225.7 million and returned approximately $84.9 million to our patent partners.
For more information related to our Intellectual Property Operations, refer to additional detailed patent business discussion below.
Industrial Operations
In October 2021, we consummated our first operating company acquisition of Printronix. Printronix is a leading manufacturer and distributor of industrial impact printers, also known as line matrix printers, and related consumables and services. The Printronix business serves a diverse group of customers that operate across healthcare, food and beverage, manufacturing and logistics, and other sectors. This mature technology is known for its ability to operate in hazardous environments. Printronix has a manufacturing site located in Malaysia and third-party configuration sites located in the United States, Singapore and Holland, along with sales and support locations around the world to support its global network of users, channel partners and strategic alliances. This acquisition was made at what we believe to be an attractive purchase price, and we are now supporting existing management in its initiative to reduce costs and operate more efficiently and in its execution of strategic partnerships to generate growth.
For more information related to our Industrial Operations, refer to the section entitled “Industrial Operations Business” below.
Energy Operations
In November 2023, we invested $10.0 million to acquire a 50.4% equity interest in Benchmark. Headquartered in Austin, Texas, Benchmark is an independent oil and gas company engaged in the acquisition, production and development of oil
and gas assets in mature resource plays in Texas and Oklahoma. Benchmark is run by an experienced management team led by Chief Executive Officer Kirk Goehring, who previously served as Chief Operating Officer of both Benchmark and Jones Energy, Inc. Benchmark’s existing assets consist of over 13,000 net acres primarily located in Roberts and Hemphill Counties in Texas, and an interest in over 125 wells, the majority of which are operated. Acacia has made a control investment in Benchmark and intends to utilize its significant capital base to acquire predictable and shallow decline, cash-flowing oil and gas properties whose value can be enhanced via a disciplined, field optimization strategy, with risk managed through robust commodity hedges and low leverage. Through its investment in Benchmark, the Company, along with the Benchmark management team, will evaluate future growth and acquisitions of oil and gas assets at attractive valuations. The Company’s consolidated financial statements include Benchmark’s consolidated operations from November 13, 2023 through December 31, 2023. Refer to Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements elsewhere herein for additional information.
For more information, refer to the section entitled “Energy Operations” below.
Recent Business Developments and Trends
Recapitalization
On October 30, 2022, the Company entered into a Recapitalization Agreement with the Investors, pursuant to which, among other things, the Company and Starboard agreed to enter into a series of transactions to restructure Starboard’s existing investments in the Company in order to simplify the Company’s capital structure. Subsequently, and in accordance with the terms contained in the Series A Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock, as amended, and the Recapitalization Agreement, on July 13, 2023, Starboard completed the Preferred Stock Conversion.
Further to the terms of the Recapitalization Agreement and in accordance with the terms of the Series B Warrants, on July 13, 2023, Starboard completed the Series B Warrants Exercise, the cancellation of $60.0 million aggregate principal amount of the Senior Secured Notes held by Starboard and the receipt by the Company of aggregate gross proceeds of approximately $55.0 million.
Starboard beneficially owns 61,123,595 shares of our common stock as of March 11, 2024, representing approximately 61.2% of the common stock based on 99,895,473 shares of common stock issued and outstanding as of such date and no shares of Series A Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock, no Series B Warrants, nor any Senior Secured Notes remain outstanding.
For a detailed description of the Series B Warrants Exercise, and the cancellations of the Senior Secured notes, the Recapitalization, the Recapitalization Agreement, and the Recapitalization Transactions, see Notes 1 and 10 to the consolidated financial statements.
Change of Chief Executive Officer and Litigation Settlement
Since 2021, we have announced various changes to our Board and senior management. Changes in leadership and key management positions have inherent risks, and there are no assurances that any of our recent changes or future changes will not affect our operations and financial condition.
On September 19, 2023, the Company together with ARG amicably settled with Clifford Press, former President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, all claims, including counterclaims filed by Mr. Press, in connection with the arbitration demand previously filed by the Company against Mr. Press. As part of the settlement, and, in exchange for, among other things, a release of claims by Mr. Press in favor of the Company and agreements by Mr. Press related to non-interference and cooperation, the Company paid to Mr. Press a total of $770,000 along with reimbursement of certain counsel fees and expenses in the amount of $480,000.
In February 2024, after over one year of service from Mr. McNulty as the Company’s Interim Chief Executive Officer, the Board appointed Mr. McNulty as Chief Executive Officer of the Company on a permanent basis. In addition, the Board expanded the size of the Board from six to seven directors and the Board appointed Mr. McNulty Jr. as a director of the Company to serve until the Company’s 2024 annual meeting of stockholders and until his successor is duly elected and qualified.
Life Sciences Portfolio
In June 2020 we acquired a portfolio of investments in 18 public and private life sciences companies (the “Life Sciences Portfolio”). That purchase was funded with a combination of available cash and capital from Starboard, for a total of approximately $282.0 million at the time of acquisition. Through the end of 2023, we have received proceeds of $507.1 million as we monetized the Life Sciences portfolio. We retained an investment in the Life Sciences Portfolio consisting of public and private securities valued at $82.8 million at December 31, 2023. On January 19, 2024, we completed the sale of our 33,023,210 shares of Arix Bioscience PLC (“Arix”) to RTW Biotech Opportunities Operating Ltd, a subsidiary of RTW Biotech Opportunities Ltd, for $57.1 million in aggregate (representing £1.43 per share at an exchange rate of 1.2087 USD/GBP). Following the completion of the share sale, we no longer own any shares of Arix. Additionally, some of the businesses in which we continue to hold an interest generate income through the receipt of royalties and milestone payments. Refer to Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements elsewhere herein for more information.
Acquisitions
In October 2021, we consummated our first operating company acquisition in connection with our acquisition of Printronix. We acquired all of the outstanding stock of Printronix, for a cash purchase price of approximately $37.0 million, which included an initial $33.0 million cash payment and a $4.0 million working capital adjustment. The Company's consolidated financial statements include Printronix's consolidated operations. Refer to Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements elsewhere herein for additional information.
In November 2023, we invested $10.0 million to acquire a 50.4% equity interest in Benchmark. Headquartered in Austin, Texas, Benchmark is an independent oil and gas company engaged in the acquisition, production and development of oil and gas assets in mature resource plays in Texas and Oklahoma.
On February16, 2024, Benchmark entered into a Purchase and Sale Agreement. Pursuant to the Purchase and Sale Agreement, Benchmark has agreed to purchase and Revolution has agreed to sell the Assets, which include approximately 140,000 net acres and approximately 470 operated producing wells in the Western Anadarko Basin throughout the Texas Panhandle and Western Oklahoma.
Under the terms and conditions of the Purchase and Sale Agreement, which has an economic effective date of March 1, 2024, the aggregate consideration to be paid to Revolution in the Revolution Transaction will consist of $145 million in cash, subject to customary post-closing adjustments. Benchmark expects the Revolution Transaction to close in the second quarter of 2024 subject to customary closing conditions, as more fully described below.
The Company’s expected contribution to Benchmark to fund its portion of the Purchase Price for the Revolution Transaction is $57.5 million which the Company anticipates will be funded from cash on hand. The remainder of the Purchase Price is expected to be funded by a combination of borrowings by Benchmark under a new revolving credit agreement of approximately $72.5 million and the remaining being funded through a cash contribution of approximately $15 million from McArron Partners, the other investor in Benchmark. Following the Revolution Transaction, the Company’s interest in Benchmark is expected to be approximately 73.1%.
Business Strategy
We intend to grow our Company by acquiring additional operating businesses, energy assets and intellectual property assets. However, we may not complete any acquisitions, and any acquisitions that we complete will be costly and could negatively affect our results of operations, and dilute our stockholders’ ownership, or cause us to incur significant expense, and we may not realize the expected benefits of acquisitions.
Inflation
Historically, inflation has not had a significant impact on us or any of our subsidiaries. While insignificant to our consolidated enterprise, during the year ended December 31, 2023, our Printronix subsidiary experienced some inflation from higher cost of raw materials than in previous years due to higher electronic and electrical and metal components. While Printronix inventory costs have been impacted by these inflationary pressures, up to this point Printronix has generally been able to adjust selling prices in response to these higher costs. Printronix have also implemented cost rationalization measures to combat the rising cost that is driven by inflation and currency pressures. Additionally, our Energy Operations Business may experience inflation. The oil and natural gas industry and the broader U.S. economy have
experienced higher than expected inflationary pressures in recent years related to increases in oil and natural gas prices, continued supply chain disruptions, labor shortages and geopolitical instability, among other pressures.
Patent Licensing and Enforcement
Patent Litigation Trial Dates and Related Trials
As of the date of this Annual Report, our Patent Licensing, Enforcement and Technologies Business has one pending patent infringement case with scheduled trial dates in the next twelve months. Patent infringement trials are components of its overall patent licensing process and are one of many factors that contribute to possible future revenue generating opportunities. Scheduled trial dates, as promulgated by the respective court, merely provide an indication of when, in future periods, the trials may occur according to the court’s scheduling calendar at a specific point in time. A court may change previously scheduled trial dates. In fact, courts often reschedule trial dates for various reasons that are unrelated to the underlying patent assets and typically for reasons that are beyond the control of our Patent Licensing, Enforcement and Technologies Business. While scheduled trial dates provide an indication of the timing of possible future revenue generating opportunities, the trials themselves and the immediately preceding periods represent the possible future revenue generating opportunities. These future opportunities can result in varying outcomes. Refer to Item 1A “Risk Factors- Risks Related to our Intellectual Property Business and Industry” of this Annual Report for additional information regarding patent litigation and related risks.
Litigation and Licensing Expense
We expect patent-related legal expenses to continue to fluctuate from period to period based on the factors summarized herein, in connection with future trial dates, international enforcement, strategic patent portfolio prosecution and our current and future patent portfolio investment, prosecution, licensing and enforcement activities. Refer to Item 1A “Risk Factors” of this Annual Report for additional information regarding litigation and licensing expense risk.
Investments in Patent Portfolios
With respect to our licensing, enforcement and overall business, neither we nor our operating subsidiaries invent new technologies or products; rather, we depend upon the identification and investment in patents, inventions and companies that own IP through our relationships with inventors, universities, research institutions, technology companies and others. If our operating subsidiaries are unable to maintain those relationships and identify and grow new relationships, then we may not be able to identify new technology-based patent opportunities for sustainable revenue and /or revenue growth.
Our current or future relationships may not provide the volume or quality of technologies necessary to sustain our licensing, enforcement and overall business. In some cases, universities and other technology sources compete against us as they seek to develop and commercialize technologies. Universities may receive financing for basic research in exchange for the exclusive right to commercialize resulting inventions. These and other strategies employed by potential partners may reduce the number of technology sources and potential clients to whom we can market our solutions. If we are unable to maintain current relationships and sources of technology or to secure new relationships and sources of technology, such inability may have a material adverse effect on our revenues, operating results, financial condition and ability to maintain our licensing and enforcement business.
Patent Portfolio Intake
One of the significant challenges in the intellectual property industry continues to be quality patent intake due to the challenges and complexity associated with the current patent environment.
During the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, we did not acquire any new patent portfolios. During 2021, we acquired one new patent portfolio consisting of Wi-Fi 6 standard essential patents. In 2020, we acquired five new patent portfolios consisting of (i) flash memory technology, (ii) voice activation and control technology, (iii) wireless networks, (iv) internet search, advertising and cloud computing technology and (v) GPS navigation. The patents and patent rights acquired in 2021 and 2020 have estimated economic useful lives of approximately five years.
Industrial Operations Business
Our Printronix subsidiary is a worldwide leader in multi-technology supply-chain printing solutions for a variety of industries, including manufacturing, transportation and logistics, retail distribution, food and beverage distribution, and pharmaceutical distribution. Printronix’s line matrix printers are used for mission critical applications within these industries, including labeling and inventory management, build sheets, invoicing, manifests and bills of lading, and reporting. In China, India and other developing countries in Asia and Africa, our printers are also prevalent in the banking and government sectors. Printronix has manufacturing, configuration and/or distribution sites located in Malaysia, the United States, Singapore, China and the Netherlands, along with sales and support locations around the world to support its global network of users, channel partners, and strategic alliances. Printronix designs and manufactures printers and related consumable products for various industrial printing applications. Printers consist of hardware and embedded software and may be sold with maintenance service agreements, which are serviced by outside contractors. Consumable products include inked ribbons which are used within Printronix's printers. Printronix’s products are primarily sold through Printronix’s global network of channel partners, such as dealers and distributors, to end-users.
Energy Operations Business
Headquartered in Austin, Texas, Benchmark is an independent oil and gas company engaged in the acquisition, production and development of oil and gas assets in mature resource plays in Texas and Oklahoma. Benchmark is run by an experienced management team led by Chief Executive Officer Kirk Goehring, who previously served as Chief Operating Officer of both Benchmark and Jones Energy, Inc. Benchmark’s existing assets consist of over 13,000 net acres primarily located in Roberts and Hemphill Counties in Texas, and an interest in over 125 wells, the majority of which are operated. Acacia has made a control investment in Benchmark and intends to utilize its significant capital base to acquire predictable and shallow decline, cash-flowing oil and gas properties whose value can be enhanced via a disciplined, field optimization strategy, with risk managed through robust commodity hedges and low leverage. Through its investment in Benchmark, the Company, along with the Benchmark management team, will evaluate future growth and acquisitions of oil and gas assets at attractive valuations.
Operating Activities
Intellectual Property Operations
Our Intellectual Property Operations revenues historically have fluctuated quarterly, and can vary significantly period to period, based on a number of factors including the following:
•the dollar amount of agreements executed each period, which can be driven by the nature and characteristics of the technology or technologies being licensed and the magnitude of infringement associated with a specific licensee;
•the specific terms and conditions of agreements executed each period including the nature and characteristics of rights granted, and the periods of infringement or term of use contemplated by the respective payments;
•fluctuations in the total number of agreements executed each period;
•the number of, timing, results and uncertainties associated with patent licensing negotiations, mediations, patent infringement actions, trial dates and other enforcement proceedings relating to our patent licensing and enforcement programs;
•the relative maturity of licensing programs during the applicable periods;
•other external factors, including the periodic status or results of ongoing negotiations, the status or results of ongoing litigations and appeals, actual or perceived shifts in the regulatory environment, impact of unrelated patent related judicial proceedings and other macroeconomic factors;
•the willingness of prospective licensees to settle significant patent infringement cases and pay reasonable license fees for the use of our patented technology, as such infringement cases approached a court determined trial date; and
•fluctuations in overall patent portfolio related enforcement activities which are impacted by the portfolio intake challenges discussed above.
Our management does not attempt to manage for smooth sequential periodic growth in revenues from period to period, and therefore, periodic results can be uneven. Unlike most operating businesses and industries, licensing revenues not generated in a current period are not necessarily foregone but, depending on whether negotiations, litigation or both continue into subsequent periods, and depending on a number of other factors, such potential revenues may be pushed into subsequent annual periods.
Industrial Operations
Refer to "Industrial Operations Business" above for information related to Printronix's operating activities.
Energy Operations
Refer to "Energy Operations Business" above for information related to Benchmark's operating activities.
In addition to the following results of operations discussion, more information related to our Intellectual Property Operations, Industrial Operations and Energy Operations segment revenues, cost of revenues and cost of production may be found in Notes 2 and 19 to the consolidated financial statements.
Results of Operations
The results reflected in this section with respect to Benchmark for the year ended December 31, 2023 include results for the period from November 13, 2023 to December 31, 2023 following our acquisition of Benchmark.
Summary of Results of Operations
Years Ended
December 31,
2023 2022 $ Change % Change
(In thousands, except percentage change values)
Total revenues $ 125,102 $ 59,223 $ 65,879 111 %
Total costs and expenses 104,166 99,315 4,851 5 %
Operating income (loss) 20,936 (40,092) 61,028 (152 %)
Total other income (expense) 46,490 (87,058) 133,548 (153 %)
Income (loss) before income taxes 67,426 (127,150) 194,576 (153 %)
Income tax benefit 1,504 16,211 (14,707) (91 %)
Net income (loss) attributable to Acacia Research Corporation 67,060 (125,065) 192,125 (154 %)
Results of Operations - year ended December 31, 2023 compared with the year ended December 31, 2022
Total revenues increased $65.9 million to $125.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2023, as compared to $59.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2022, primarily due to an increase in our Intellectual Property Operations revenues partially offset by a decrease in Industrial Operations revenues. ARG revenues increased due to one patent portfolio that generated license revenue in the fourth quarter of 2023, which contributed to Intellectual Property Operations revenues increasing by $69.6 million. Refer to “Investments in Patent Portfolios” above for additional information regarding the impact of portfolio acquisition trends on current and future licensing and enforcement related revenues. The decrease in Industrial Operations revenue of $4.6 million is due to lower units of printers sold. Refer to “Industrial Operations - Revenues” below for further detailed discussion. In addition, post-acquisition revenues from Benchmark for the period from November 13, 2023 to December 31, 2023 contributed $848,000. Refer to “Energy Operations - Revenues” below for further discussion.
Income before income taxes was $67.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2023, as compared to loss of $127.2 million in the prior year. The net increase was comprised of the change in total revenues described above and other changes in operating expenses and other income or expense as follows:
•Inventor royalties decreased $187,000, from $1.2 million to $1.0 million in 2023, primarily due to license agreement activity and related revenues generated in 2023 with no inventor royalty obligations. Refer to "Intellectual Property Operations - Cost of Revenues" below for further discussion.
•Contingent legal fees increased $8.6 million, from $2.4 million to $11.0 million in 2023, primarily due to the change in Intellectual Property Operations revenues described above. Refer to "Intellectual Property Operations - Cost of Revenues" below for further discussion.
•Litigation and licensing expenses increased $6.8 million, from $4.0 million to $10.8 million in 2023, primarily due to a net increase in litigation support and third-party technical consulting expenses associated with ongoing litigation. Refer to "Intellectual Property Operations - Cost of Revenues" below for further discussion.
•Printronix cost of sales, engineering and development expenses, and sales and marketing expenses decreased approximately $3.0 million, from $28.6 million to $25.7 million in 2023. Refer to "Industrial Operations - Cost of Revenues" and "Operating Expenses" below for further discussion.
•Post-acquisition cost of production from Benchmark for the period from November 13, 2023 through December 31, 2023 added operating expenses in the amount of $656,000 in 2023. Refer to "Energy Operations - Cost of Production" below for further discussion.
•General and administrative expenses decreased $9.0 million, from $52.7 million to $43.7 million in 2023, primarily due to lower parent company and Intellectual Property Operations costs including, compensation expense for share-based awards, personnel costs, severance costs and our Industrial Operations general and administrative costs, offset partially by an increase in variable performance-based compensation costs and the addition of $264,000 expenses from our Energy Operations related to post-acquisition general and administrative costs from Benchmark for the period from November 13, 2023 through December 31, 2023. Refer to "General and Administrative Expenses" below for further detail and discussion.
•Compensation expense for share-based awards, included in general and administrative expenses above, decreased $523,000, from $3.8 million to $3.3 million in 2023, primarily due to forfeitures for terminated employees, which was partially offset by restricted stock and option grants issued to employees and the Board in 2023 and 2022.
•Unrealized gain from the change in fair value of our equity securities was $31.4 million in 2023, as compared to an unrealized loss of $263.7 million in the prior year. The unrealized gain and loss were derived from our Life Sciences Portfolio and trading securities portfolio. The prior year unrealized loss primarily relates to the reversal of unrealized gains previously recorded for shares sold during the year for realized gains. Refer to "Equity Securities Investments" below for further discussion.
•Realized loss from the sale of equity securities was $10.9 million in 2023, as compared to a realized gain of $125.3 million in the prior year. The realized gains and losses were similarly derived from the sales activity from our Life Sciences Portfolio and trading securities portfolio. Refer to "Equity Securities Investments" below for further discussion.
•Earnings on equity investment in joint venture decreased $38.4 million, from $42.5 million to $4.2 million in 2023. The current year includes the earnings on equity investment in joint venture from two milestone payments while the prior year included higher milestone payment amounts with related accrued interest and earnings on equity investment in the joint venture. Refer to "Equity Securities Investments" below for a detailed discussion.
•Unrealized gain from the Series B warrants and the embedded derivative fair value measurements was $8.2 million in 2023, as compared to an unrealized gain of $13.1 million from the Series A and Series B warrants and embedded derivative fair value measurements in the prior year. Refer to Notes 10 and 11 to the consolidated financial statements elsewhere herein for additional information regarding the Starboard Securities and fair value measurements.
•Gain on foreign currency exchange was $53,000 in 2023, as compared to a loss on foreign currency exchange of $3.3 million in the prior year. The gains and losses were primarily derived from our foreign cash accounts exposed to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates between the U.S. dollar and the British Pound.
•Interest expense on Senior Secured Notes decreased $4.5 million, from $6.4 million to $1.9 million in 2023, due to the cancellation of the remaining $60.0 million aggregate principal amount outstanding of the Senior Secured Notes on July 13, 2023, pursuant to the Series B Warrants Exercise. Refer to Note 10 to the consolidated financial statements elsewhere herein for additional information regarding the Starboard Senior Secured Notes.
•Interest income and other, net was $15.5 million in 2023, as compared to $5.4 million in the prior year, mainly due to an increase in interest income from our cash equivalents, offset partially by an increase in the write off of the remaining limited unsecured notes of Adaptix Limited. Refer to Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements elsewhere herein for additional information regarding our cash and cash equivalents and investments in equity securities.
Intellectual Property Operations
Revenues
ARG's revenue activity for the periods presented included the following:
Years Ended
December 31,
2023 2022 $ Change % Change
(In thousands, except percentage change values and count totals)
Paid-up license revenue agreements $ 87,835 $ 17,788 $ 70,047 394 %
Recurring license revenue agreements 1,321 1,720 (399) (23 %)
Total revenues $ 89,156 $ 19,508 $ 69,648 357 %
New license agreements executed 16 17 (1) (6 %)
Licensing and enforcement programs
generating revenues 7 8 (1) (13 %)
For the periods presented above, the majority of the revenue agreements executed during the relevant period provided for the payment of one-time, paid-up license fees in consideration for the grant of certain IP Rights for patented technology owned by our operating subsidiaries. These rights were primarily granted on a perpetual basis, extending until the expiration of the underlying patents. Paid-up revenue increased $70.0 million due to one patent portfolio that generated license revenue in the fourth quarter of 2023. Recurring revenue, that provides for quarterly sales-based license fees, decreased $399,000 from various on-going license arrangements.
Refer to Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements elsewhere herein for additional information regarding our revenue arrangements and related concentrations for the periods presented herein.
Refer to “Investments in Patent Portfolios” above for information regarding the impact of portfolio acquisition trends on current and future licensing and enforcement related revenues.
Cost of Revenues
Years Ended
December 31,
2023 2022 $ Change % Change
(In thousands, except percentage change values)
Inventor royalties $ 1,025 $ 1,212 $ (187) (15 %)
Contingent legal fees 10,998 2,444 8,554 350 %
Litigation and licensing expenses 10,771 3,970 6,801 171 %
Amortization of patents 11,370 10,403 967 9 %
Total $ 34,164 $ 18,029 $ 16,135 89 %
Refer to detailed change explanations above for the year ended December 31, 2023 and 2022 regarding cost of revenues for our Intellectual Property Operations.
The economic terms of patent portfolio related partnering agreements and contingent legal fee arrangements, if any, including royalty obligations, if any, royalty rates, contingent fee rates and other terms and conditions, vary across the patent portfolios owned or controlled by our operating subsidiaries. In certain instances, we have invested in certain patent portfolios without future patent partner royalty obligations. The costs associated with the forementioned obligations fluctuate period to period, based on the amount of revenues recognized each period, the terms and conditions of revenue agreements executed each period and the mix of specific patent portfolios, with varying economic terms and conditions, generating revenues each period.
Litigation and licensing expenses include patent-related litigation, enforcement and prosecution costs incurred by law firms and external patent attorneys engaged on either an hourly basis or a contingent fee basis. Litigation and licensing expenses also includes third-party patent research, development, patent prosecution and maintenance fees, re-exam and inter partes reviews, consulting and other costs incurred in connection with the licensing and enforcement of patent portfolios. Refer to “Investments in Patent Portfolios” above for additional information regarding the impact of portfolio acquisition trends on current and future licensing and enforcement related revenues.
Industrial Operations
Revenues
Printronix's net revenues for the periods presented included the following:
Years Ended
December 31,
2023 2022 $ Change % Change
(In thousands, except percentage change value)
Printers and parts $ 12,513 $ 16,118 $ (3,605) (22 %)
Consumable products 19,091 19,314 (223) (1 %)
Services 3,494 4,283 (789) (18 %)
Total $ 35,098 $ 39,715 $ (4,617) (12 %)
For the periods presented above, the majority of the contract agreements executed in the relevant period include various combinations of tangible products (which include printers, consumables and parts) and services. Revenue from printers and parts decreased $3.6 million due to a decrease in the number of printer units sold. Refer to Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements elsewhere herein for additional information regarding Printronix's revenue arrangements and related concentrations. Refer to “Industrial Operations Business” above for additional information related to Printronix's operating activities.
Cost of Revenues
Years Ended
December 31,
2023 2022 $ Change % Change
(In thousands, except percentage change values)
Cost of revenues - industrial operations $ 18,009 $ 19,359 $ (1,350) (7 %)
Refer to detailed change explanations above for the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022 regarding cost of revenues for our Industrial Operations. The decrease in Printronix's cost of revenues for the year ended December 31, 2023 is due to change in revenue described above. Refer to Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements elsewhere herein for additional information regarding Printronix's cost of sales.
Energy Operations
Revenues
Benchmark's revenues from November 13, 2023 through December 31, 2023 included the following (in thousands):
Oil sales $ 256
Natural gas sales 372
Natural gas liquids sales 220
Total $ 848
Refer to Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements elsewhere herein for additional information regarding Benchmark's revenue arrangements and related concentrations.
Cost of Production
Benchmark's cost of production from November 13, 2023 through December 31, 2023 was $656,000. Refer to Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements elsewhere herein for additional information regarding Benchmark's cost of production.
Operating Expenses
Years Ended
December 31,
2023 2022 $ Change % Change
(In thousands, except percentage change values)
Engineering and development expenses - industrial operations $ 735 $ 626 $ 109 17 %
Sales and marketing expenses - industrial operations 6,908 8,621 (1,713) (20 %)
General and administrative costs - intellectual property operations 7,402 5,428 1,974 36 %
General and administrative costs - industrial operations 8,722 9,986 (1,264) (13 %)
General and administrative costs - energy operations 264 - 264 n/a
Parent general and administrative expenses 27,306 37,266 (9,960) (27 %)
Total general and administrative expenses 43,694 52,680 (8,986) (17 %)
Total $ 51,337 $ 61,927 $ (10,590) (17 %)
The operating expenses table above includes the Company's general and administrative expenses by operation and Printronix's engineering and development expenses and sales and marketing expenses. The table includes Benchmark's general and administrative costs for the post acquisition period from November 13, 2023 through December 31, 2023. Refer to Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements elsewhere herein for additional information regarding Printronix's operating expenses.
General and Administrative Expenses
A summary of the main drivers of the change in general and administrative expenses is as follows:
Years Ended
December 31,
2023 vs. 2022
(In thousands)
Personnel costs and board fees $ (1,005)
Variable performance-based compensation costs 1,047
Other general and administrative costs (3,772)
General and administrative costs - industrial operations (1,264)
General and administrative costs - energy operations 264
Compensation expense for share-based awards (523)
Non-recurring employee severance costs (3,733)
Total change in general and administrative expenses $ (8,986)
General and administrative expenses include employee compensation and related personnel costs, including variable performance based compensation and compensation expense for share-based awards, office and facilities costs, legal and accounting professional fees, public relations, stock administration, business development, fixed asset depreciation, amortization of Industrial Operations intangible assets, state taxes based on gross receipts and other corporate costs. The table above includes our Energy Operations general and administrative expenses for the post acquisition period from November 13, 2023 through December 31, 2023.
The decrease in personnel cost and board fees and compensation expense for share-based awards was primarily due to a decrease in headcount and related costs. The increase in variable performance-based compensation costs was primarily due to fluctuations in performance-based compensation accruals. The decrease in other general and administrative costs, which relates to our parent company and Intellectual Property Operations business, were primarily due to lower legal fees. Refer to Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements elsewhere herein for the additional information regarding the limited unsecured notes. The decrease in general and administrative costs of Industrial Operations is due to Printronix's initiative to reduce costs and operate more efficiently. Non-recurring employee severance costs fluctuate based on the severance arrangements of terminated employees. In addition, our Energy Operations related general and administrative costs increased from post-acquisition expenses from Benchmark for the period from November 13, 2023 through December 31, 2023. Refer to additional general and administrative change explanations above.
Other Income/Expense
Equity Securities Investments
Years Ended
December 31,
2023 2022 $ Change % Change
(In thousands, except percentage change values)
Change in fair value of equity securities $ 31,423 $ (263,695) $ 295,118 (112 %)
(Loss) gain on sale of equity securities (10,930) 125,318 (136,248) (109 %)
Earnings on equity investment in joint venture 4,167 42,531 (38,364) (90 %)
Total net realized and unrealized gain (loss) $ 24,660 $ (95,846) $ 120,506 (126 %)
Our equity securities investments, including the Life Sciences Portfolio and trading securities portfolio, are recorded at fair value at each balance sheet date. During the fourth quarter of 2022, Acacia fully exited its position in Oxford Nanopore. Refer to periodic change explanations above. Refer to Notes 2 and 4 to the consolidated financial statements elsewhere herein for additional information regarding our investment in the Life Sciences Portfolio and other equity securities.
Our results included an unrealized gain from the change in fair value of our equity securities as compared to an unrealized loss in the prior year, and included realized loss from the sale of our equity securities as compared to a realized gain in the prior year. These changes were derived from our Life Sciences Portfolio and trading securities portfolio. The current period unrealized gain primarily relates to our Life Sciences Portfolio and trading securities portfolio. The current period realized loss primarily relates to sales activity from trading securities portfolio.
During 2023, we recorded consolidated earnings on equity investment in joint venture, which is part of the Life Sciences Portfolio, of $4.2 million for two milestones earned during the period. During 2022, we recorded consolidated earnings on equity investment of $42.5 million, including two milestones and accrued interest that were due in 2022. Refer to Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements elsewhere herein for additional information.
Income Taxes
Years Ended
December 31,
2023 2022 $ Change % Change
(In thousands, except percentage change values)
Income tax benefit $ 1,504 $ 16,211 $ (14,707) (91 %)
Effective tax rate (2) % (13) % n/a 11 %
Our income tax benefit for the year ended December 31, 2023 is primarily attributable to the use of tax attributes against 2023 earnings and the release of valuation allowance on the remaining federal net operating losses. Our income tax benefit for the year ended December 31, 2022 primarily reflects the decrease in deferred tax liabilities attributable to the unrealized losses recorded, expiration of foreign tax credits and changes in the valuation allowance.
Our 2023 effective tax rate was lower than the U.S. federal statutory rate primarily due to utilization of foreign tax credits, changes in valuation allowance, as well as non-deductible items. Our 2022 effective tax rate was lower than the U.S. federal statutory rate primarily due to the change in valuation allowance, as well as non-deductible items. The effective tax rate may be subject to fluctuations during the year as new information is obtained which may affect the assumptions used
to estimate the effective tax rate, including factors such as expected utilization of net operating loss carryforwards, changes in or the interpretation of tax laws in jurisdictions where the Company conducts business, the Company’s expansion into new states or foreign countries, and the amount of valuation allowances against deferred tax assets.
The Company has recorded a partial valuation allowance against our net deferred tax assets as of December 31, 2023 and 2022. Refer to Notes 2 and 17 to the consolidated financial statements elsewhere herein for additional income tax information.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
General
Our foreseeable material cash requirements as of December 31, 2023, are recognized as liabilities or generally are otherwise described in Note 13, "Commitments and Contingencies," to the consolidated financial statements included elsewhere herein.
Cash requirements are generally derived from our operating and investing activities including expenditures for working capital (discussed below), human capital, business development, investments in equity securities and intellectual property, and business combinations. Our facilities lease obligations, guarantees and certain contingent obligations are further described in Note 13 to the consolidated financial statements. Historically, we have not entered into off-balance sheet financing arrangements. At December 31, 2023, we had unrecognized tax benefits, as further described in Note 17 to the consolidated financial statements.
On July 13, 2023, in accordance with the terms of the Recapitalization Agreement, Starboard completed the Series B Warrants Exercise and pursuant to the Series B Warrants Exercise, the Company cancelled $60.0 million aggregate principal amount of Senior Secured Notes held by Starboard and received aggregate gross proceeds of approximately $55.0 million. At the closing of the Series B Warrants Exercise, the Company effectively paid to Starboard an aggregate amount of $66.0 million representing a negotiated settlement of the foregone time value of the Series B Warrants and the Series A Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock (which amount was paid through a reduction in the exercise price of the Series B Warrants). This effectively modified the exercise price of the Series B Warrants. Upon the Series B Warrants Exercise, the Investors exercised the Series B Warrants at a reduced price and Company issued an aggregate of 31,506,849 shares of the Company's common stock to the Investors in consideration of their cash payment and cancellation of any outstanding Senior Secured Notes. No shares of Series A Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock, no Series B Warrants, nor any Senior Secured Notes remain. For additional information, see Note 10, "Starboard Investment" to the consolidated financial statements.
Certain of our operating subsidiaries are often required to engage in litigation to enforce their patents and patent rights. In connection with any of our operating subsidiaries’ patent enforcement actions, it is possible that a defendant may request and/or a court may rule that an operating subsidiary has violated statutory authority, regulatory authority, federal rules, local court rules, or governing standards relating to the substantive or procedural aspects of such enforcement actions. In such event, a court may issue monetary sanctions against us or our operating subsidiaries or award attorney’s fees and/or expenses to a defendant(s), which could be material.
At December 31, 2023, our primary sources of liquidity are cash and cash equivalents on hand and cash generated from our operating activities. Our cash and cash equivalents on hand includes proceeds of the completed Rights Offering and Concurrent Private Rights Offering (each as defined in Note 10 to the consolidated financial statements).
The Company’s expected contribution to Benchmark to fund its portion of the Purchase Price for the Revolution Transaction is $57.5 million, which the Company anticipates will be funded from cash on hand. The remainder of the Purchase Price is expected to be funded by a combination of borrowings by Benchmark under a new revolving credit agreement of approximately $72.5 million and the remaining being funded through a cash contribution of approximately $15 million from McArron Partners, the other investor in Benchmark.
Furthermore, we intend to grow our company by acquiring additional operating businesses and intellectual property assets. We expect to finance such acquisitions through cash on hand or by engaging in equity or debt financing.
Our management believes that our cash and cash equivalent balances and cash flows from operations will be sufficient to meet our cash requirements through at least twelve months from the date of this Annual Report and for the foreseeable
future. We may, however, encounter unforeseen difficulties that may deplete our capital resources more rapidly than anticipated, including those set forth under Item 1A, “Risk Factors”. Any efforts to seek additional funding could be made through issuances of equity or debt, or other external financing. However, additional funding may not be available to us on favorable terms, or at all. The capital and credit markets have experienced extreme volatility and disruption in recent years, and the volatility and impact of the disruption may continue. At times during this period, the volatility and disruption has reached unprecedented levels. In several cases, the markets have exerted downward pressure on stock prices and credit capacity for certain issuers, and the commercial paper markets may not be a reliable source of short-term financing for us. If we fail to obtain additional financing when needed, we may not be able to execute our business plans and our business, conducted by our operating subsidiaries, may suffer.
Cash, Cash Equivalents and Investments
Our consolidated cash, cash equivalents and equity securities totaled $403.2 million at December 31, 2023, compared to $349.4 million at December 31, 2022.
Cash Flows Summary
The net change in cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash for the periods presented was comprised of the following:
Years Ended December 31,
2023 2022
(In thousands)
Net cash provided by (used in):
Operating activities $ (22,506) $ (37,336)
Investing activities 16,178 184,464
Financing activities 58,632 (166,137)
Effect of exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents 1 (2,566)
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents $ 52,305 $ (21,575)
Cash Flows from Operating Activities
Cash flows from operating activities were comprised of the following for the periods presented:
Years Ended December 31,
2023 2022
(In thousands)
Net income (loss) including noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries $ 68,930 $ (110,939)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) including noncontrolling interests in
subsidiaries to net cash used in operating activities:
Depreciation, depletion and amortization 14,728 13,514
Amortization of debt discount and issuance costs - 90
Change in fair values Series A redeemable convertible preferred stock embedded derivatives, Series A warrants and Series B warrants (6,716) (15,106)
Loss on exercise of Series A warrants - 2,004
Gain on exercise of Series B warrants (1,525) -
Compensation expense for share-based awards 3,297 3,820
(Gain) loss on foreign currency exchange (53) 3,324
Change in fair value of equity securities (31,423) 263,695
Loss (gain) on sale of equity securities 10,930 (125,318)
Unrealized gain on derivatives (781) -
Earnings on equity investment in joint venture (4,167) (42,531)
Deferred income taxes (3,657) (17,810)
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable (70,313) 998
Inventories 3,301 (5,291)
Prepaid expenses and other assets (820) (5,986)
Accounts payable and accrued expenses (4,651) (136)
Royalties and contingent legal fees payable 751 (1,764)
Deferred revenue (337) 100
Net cash used in operating activities $ (22,506) $ (37,336)
Cash receipts from ARG's licensees totaled $12.2 million and $16.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively. Cash receipts from Printronix's customers totaled $37.3 million and $40.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively. Cash receipts from Benchmark's customers totaled $1.8 million for the post acquisition period from November 13, 2023 through December 31, 2023. The fluctuations in cash receipts for the periods presented primarily reflects the corresponding fluctuations in revenues recognized during the same periods, as described above, and the related timing of payments received from licensees and customers.
Our reported cash used in operations for the year ended December 31, 2023 was $22.5 million, compared to $37.3 million in the prior year. The decrease in cash used in operations was primarily due to net outflows from the total changes in assets and liabilities (refer to Working Capital discussion below), increase in accounts receivable and inventory related sales, and by the total change in net income (described above) and related noncash adjustments.
Working Capital
Our working capital related to cash flows from operating activities at December 31, 2023 increased to $87.0 million, compared to $15.1 million at December 31, 2022, which was comprised of the changes in assets and liabilities presented above. The increase is primarily due to change in accounts receivable, which is related to the timing of the cash receipts related to Intellectual Property Operations Business.
Cash Flows from Investing Activities
Cash flows from investing activities were comprised of the following for the periods presented:
Years Ended December 31,
2023 2022
(In thousands)
Acquisition, net of cash acquired (Note 3) $ (9,409) $ -
Cash reinvested 9,965 -
Patent acquisition (6,000) (5,000)
Purchases of equity securities (13,072) (112,142)
Sales of equity securities 32,106 273,934
Distributions received from equity investment in joint venture 2,777 28,404
Purchases of property and equipment (189) (732)
Net cash provided by investing activities $ 16,178 $ 184,464
Cash flows from investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2023 decreased to $16.2 million, as compared to cash flow of $184.5 million in the prior year, primarily due to net cash inflows from our Life Sciences Portfolio, trading securities portfolio equity securities transactions and Acacia's acquisition of Benchmark in 2023. Refer to “Other Income/Expense - Equity Securities Investments” and “Recent Business Developments and Trends - Acquisitions” above and Notes 3 and 4 to the consolidated financial statements elsewhere herein for additional information related to Acacia's acquisition of Benchmark and Life Sciences Portfolio, respectively.
Cash Flows from Financing Activities
Cash flows from financing activities included the following for the periods presented:
Years Ended December 31,
2023 2022
(In thousands)
Repurchase of common stock $ - $ (50,988)
Paydown of Revolving Credit Facility (7,700) -
Paydown of Senior Secured Notes (60,000) (120,000)
Dividend on Series A Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock (1,400) (2,799)
Taxes paid related to net share settlement of share-based awards (614) (1,600)
Proceeds from Rights Offering 79,111 -
Proceeds from exercise of Series A warrants - 9,250
Proceeds from exercise of Series B warrants 49,000 -
Proceeds from exercise of stock options 235 -
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities $ 58,632 $ (166,137)
Cash inflows from financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2023 increased to $58.6 million, as compared to cash outflow of $166.1 million in the prior year, primarily due to activity related to the Rights Offering and Concurrent Private Rights Offering. On October 30, 2022, the Company entered into a Recapitalization Agreement with Starboard and the Investors. On July 13, 2023, Starboard completed the Series B Warrants Exercise through a combination of a "Note Cancellation" and a "Limited Cash Exercise." Refer to Note 10 to the consolidated financial statements elsewhere herein for additional information.
Critical Accounting Estimates
Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. In preparing these financial statements, we make assumptions, judgments and estimates that involve a significant level of estimation uncertainty and have had or are reasonably likely to have a material impact on our
financial condition or results of operations. We base our assumptions, judgments and estimates on historical experience and various other factors that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results could differ materially from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. On a regular basis, we evaluate our assumptions, judgments and estimates and make changes accordingly.
We believe that of the significant accounting policies discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements included elsewhere herein, the following accounting policies require our most difficult, subjective or complex assumptions, judgments and estimates:
•revenue recognition;
•estimates of crude oil and natural gas reserves
•valuation of long-lived assets, goodwill and other intangible assets;
•valuation of Series B Warrants;
•valuation of embedded derivatives; and
•accounting for income taxes.
We discuss below the critical accounting assumptions, judgements and estimates associated with these policies. Historically, our critical accounting estimates relative to our significant accounting policies have not differed materially from actual results. For further information on the related significant accounting policies, refer to Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements.
Revenue Recognition
As described below, significant management judgment must be made and used in connection with the revenue recognized in any accounting period. Material differences may result in the amount and timing of revenue recognized or deferred for any period, if management made different judgments.
Printronix recognizes revenue to depict the transfer of goods or services to a customer at an amount that reflects the consideration which it expects to receive for providing those goods or services. To determine the transaction price, Printronix estimates the amount of consideration to which it expects to be entitled in exchange for transferring promised goods or services to a customer. Elements of variable consideration are estimated at the time of sale which primarily include product rights of return, rebates, price protection and other incentives that occur under established sales programs. These estimates are developed using the expected value or the most likely amount method and are reviewed and updated, as necessary, at each reporting period. Revenues, inclusive of variable consideration, are recognized to the extent it is probable that a significant reversal recognized will not occur in future periods. The provision for returns and sales allowances is determined by an analysis of the historical rate of returns and sales allowances over recent quarters, and adjusted to reflect management’s future expectations. For additional information regarding Printronix's net revenues, refer to Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements.
Benchmark recognizes revenue when performance obligations are satisfied at the point control of the product is transferred to the customer. Virtually all of Benchmark's contracts' pricing provisions are tied to a market index, with certain adjustments based on, among other factors, whether a well delivers to a gathering or transmission line, quality of the oil and natural gas products and prevailing supply and demand conditions. As a result, the price of the oil and natural gas fluctuate to remain competitive with other available oil and natural gas supplies. To the extent actual volumes and prices of oil and natural gas products are unavailable at the time of reporting, Benchmark will estimate the amounts. For additional information regarding Benchmark's revenues, refer to Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements. The differences between such estimates and actual amounts of oil and natural gas sales are recorded in the following month upon receipt of payment from the customer and any differences have historically been insignificant.
Estimate of Crude Oil and Natural Gas Reserves
Estimates of crude oil and natural gas reserves, as determined by independent petroleum engineers, are continually subject to revision based on price, production history and other factors. Estimated crude oil and natural gas reserves affect the
carrying value of oil and gas properties, depreciation, depletion and amortizations, asset retirement obligations, and evaluation of impairment of oil and natural gas properties. Changes in the estimated reserves could have a significant impact on future results of operations.
Valuation of Long-lived Assets, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
The Company reviews long-lived assets, patents and other intangible assets for potential impairment annually (quarterly for patents) and when events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. In the event the expected undiscounted future cash flows resulting from the use of the asset is less than the carrying amount of the asset, an impairment loss is recorded in an amount equal to the excess of the asset’s carrying value over its fair value. If an asset is determined to be impaired, the loss is measured based on quoted market prices in active markets, if available. If quoted market prices are not available, the estimate of fair value is based on various valuation techniques, including a discounted value of estimated future cash flows. For additional information regarding ARG's patent portfolio valuation estimates, refer to Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements. The Company did not record any long-lived asset, patent or other intangible asset impairment charges for the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022.
Goodwill asset impairment reviews include determining the estimated fair values of our reporting units. We evaluate Goodwill for impairment annually in the fourth quarter and on an interim basis if the facts and circumstances lead us to believe that more-likely-than-not there has been an impairment. The key assumptions and inputs used in such determinations may include forecasting revenues and expenses, cash flows and capital expenditures, as well as an appropriate discount rate and other inputs. Significant judgment by management is required in estimating the fair value of a reporting unit and in performing impairment reviews. Due to the inherent subjectivity and uncertainty in forecasting future cash flows and earnings over long periods of time, actual results may vary materially from the forecasts. If the carrying value of a reporting unit exceeds the estimated fair value of the reporting unit, then the excess, limited to the carrying amount of goodwill, will be charged to operations as an impairment loss. The Company's goodwill balance relates to primarily Printronix, which was acquired on October 7, 2021, and Benchmark, which was acquired on November 13, 2023, refer to Notes 1 and 3 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information. The Company did not record any goodwill impairment charges for the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022.
Valuation of Series B Warrants
The fair value of the Series B Warrants are estimated using a Black-Scholes option-pricing model. Refer to Note 9 to the consolidated financial statements for detailed information related to these fair value measurements. Of the assumptions used in the Black-Scholes option-pricing model, volatility changes would have the most significant impact on the fair value. As of December 31, 2023, the fair value of the Series B Warrants is zero. Refer to Note 10 to the consolidated financial statements for more information.
Valuation of Embedded Derivatives
Embedded derivatives that are required to be bifurcated from their host contract are valued separately from the host instrument. An as-converted value was used to estimate the fair value of the embedded derivative in the Series A Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock when it was outstanding. Refer to Note 11 to the consolidated financial statements for detailed information related to this fair value measurement. Of the assumptions used in the as-converted model, discount rate changes had the most significant impact on the fair value. As of December 31, 2023, the fair value of the embedded derivative in the Series A Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock is zero because it is no longer outstanding. Refer to Note 10 to the consolidated financial statements for more information.
Accounting for Income Taxes
As part of the process of preparing our consolidated financial statements, we are required to estimate our income taxes in each of the jurisdictions in which we operate. This process involves the estimating of our actual current tax exposure together with assessing temporary differences resulting from differing treatment of items. These differences result in deferred tax assets and liabilities, which are included within our consolidated balance sheets. We must then assess the likelihood that our deferred tax assets will be recovered from future taxable income and to the extent we believe that recovery is not likely, we must establish a valuation allowance. To the extent we establish a valuation allowance or increase this allowance in a period, we must include an expense within the tax provision in the consolidated statements of operations.
Significant management judgment is required in determining our provision for income taxes, our deferred tax assets and liabilities and our valuation allowance. Due to uncertainties related to our ability to utilize certain deferred tax assets in future periods, we have recorded a partial valuation allowance against our net deferred tax assets as of December 31, 2023 and 2022. These assets primarily consist of foreign tax credits and net operating loss carryforwards. Refer to Note 17 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information.
In assessing the need for a valuation allowance, management has considered both the positive and negative evidence available, including but not limited to, estimates of future taxable income and related probabilities, estimates surrounding the character of future income and the timing of realization, consideration of the period over which our deferred tax assets may be recoverable, our recent history of net income and prior history of losses, projected future outcomes, industry and market trends and the nature of existing deferred tax assets. In management’s estimate, any positive indicators, including forecasts of potential future profitability of our businesses, are outweighed by the uncertainties surrounding our estimates and judgments of potential future taxable income, primarily due to uncertainties surrounding the timing of realization of future taxable income and the character of such income in particular future periods (i.e. foreign or domestic). In the event that actual results differ from these estimates or we adjust these estimates should we believe we would be able to realize these deferred tax assets in the future, an adjustment to the valuation allowance would increase income in the period such determination was made.
Any changes in the judgments, assumptions and estimates associated with our analysis of the need for a valuation allowance in any future periods could materially impact our financial position and results of operations in the periods in which those determinations are made.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Refer to Note 2 to consolidated financial statements included elsewhere herein.

---

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
The primary objective of our short-term investment activities is to preserve principal while concurrently maximizing the income we receive from our equity securities without significantly increasing risk. Some of the securities that we invest in may be subject to interest rate risk and/or market risk. This means that a change in prevailing interest rates, with respect to interest rate risk, or a change in the value of the United States equity markets, with respect to market risk, may cause the principal amount or market value of the equity securities to fluctuate. For example, if we hold a security that was issued with a fixed interest rate at the then-prevailing rate and the prevailing interest rate later rises, the current value of the principal amount of our investment may decline. To minimize these risks in the future, we intend to maintain our portfolio of cash equivalents and equity securities in a variety of securities. Cash equivalents are comprised of investments in U.S. treasury securities and AAA rated money market funds that invest in first-tier only securities, which primarily include domestic commercial paper and securities issued or guaranteed by the U.S. government or its agencies. In general, money market funds are not subject to market risk because the interest paid on such funds fluctuates with the prevailing interest rate. Accordingly, a 100 basis point increase in interest rates or a 10% decline in the value of the United States equity markets would not be expected to have a material impact on the value of such money market funds. Declines in interest rates over time will, however, reduce our interest income.
Investment Risk
We are exposed to investment risks related to changes in the underlying financial condition of certain of our equity investments in technology companies. The fair value of these investments can be significantly impacted by the risk of adverse changes in securities markets generally, as well as risks related to the performance of the companies whose securities we have invested in, risks associated with specific industries, and other factors. These investments are subject to significant fluctuations in fair value due to the volatility of the securities markets and of the underlying businesses.
As of December 31, 2023 and 2022, the carrying value of our equity investments in public and private companies was $99.8 million and $98.4 million, respectively.
We record our equity investments in publicly traded companies at fair value, which are subject to market price volatility. As of December 31, 2023, a hypothetical 10% adverse change in the market price of our investments in publicly traded common stock would have resulted in a decrease of approximately $599,000 in such equity investments. We evaluate our equity investments in private companies for impairment when events and circumstances indicate that the decline in fair value of such assets below the carrying value is other-than temporary.
Foreign Currency Exchange Risk
Although we historically have not had material foreign operations, we are also exposed to market risks related to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates between the U.S. dollar, and the British Pound and Euro currency exchange rates, primarily related to foreign cash accounts, a note receivable and certain equity security investments. As of December 31, 2023, a hypothetical 10% change in exchange rates related to our at risk foreign denominated equity securities would have approximately a $5.7 million effect on our financial position and results of operations.

---

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
The financial statements and related financial information required to be filed hereunder are indexed under Item 15 of this report and are incorporated herein by reference.

---

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.

---

ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Conclusion Regarding the Effectiveness of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)) that are designed to ensure that information required to be
disclosed in our reports under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and that this information is accumulated and communicated to management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate, to allow for timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and management is required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures. Our management, with the participation of our principal executive officer and our principal financial officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2023. Based on the evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2023, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that, as of such date, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance level.
Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate “internal control over financial reporting,” as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act. Internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Because of inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies and procedures may deteriorate.
Our management conducted an assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2023 based on the criteria set forth in the Internal Control Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on the assessment, our management has concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2023.
Exemption from Attestation Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
This Report does not include an attestation report of our independent registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by our independent registered public accounting firm pursuant to the rules of the SEC that permit us to provide only Management’s Annual Report because we are a non-accelerated filer.
Changes in Internal Controls over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with the evaluation required by Rule 13a-15(d) and 15d-15(d) of the Exchange Act that occurred during the quarter ended December 31, 2023 that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

---

ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION
During the three months ended December 31, 2023, no director or officer (as defined in Rule 16a-1(f) of the Exchange Act) of Acacia Research Group adopted or terminated a “Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement” or “non-Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement,” as each term is defined in Item 408(a) of Regulation S-K.

---

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Except as provided below, in accordance with General Instruction G(3) to Form 10-K, certain information required by this Item is incorporated herein by reference to our definitive proxy statement for our 2024 annual meeting of stockholders to be filed with the SEC within 120 days after the close of our fiscal year.
Code of Conduct
We have adopted a Code of Conduct that applies to all employees, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer and any persons performing similar functions. Our Code of Conduct is provided on our internet website at www.acaciaresearch.com.

---

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
In accordance with General Instruction G(3) to Form 10-K, the information required by this Item is incorporated herein by reference to our definitive proxy statement for our 2024 annual meeting of stockholders to be filed with the SEC within 120 days after the close of our fiscal year.

---

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
In accordance with General Instruction G(3) to Form 10-K, the information required by this Item is incorporated herein by reference to our definitive proxy statement for our 2024 annual meeting of stockholders to be filed with the SEC within 120 days after the close of our fiscal year.

---

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
In accordance with General Instruction G(3) to Form 10-K, the information required by this Item is incorporated herein by reference to our definitive proxy statement for our 2024 annual meeting of stockholders to be filed with the SEC within 120 days after the close of our fiscal year.

---

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
In accordance with General Instruction G(3) to Form 10-K, the information required by this Item is incorporated herein by reference to our definitive proxy statement for our 2024 annual meeting of stockholders to be filed with the SEC within 120 days after the close of our fiscal year.
PART IV

---

ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
(a)The following documents are filed as part of this report.
(1)Financial Statements.
Page
Acacia Research Corporation Consolidated Financial Statements:
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (GRANT THORNTON LLP; New York, NY; PCAOB ID#248)
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2023 and 2022
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2023 and 2022
Consolidated Statements of Series A Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock and Stockholders’ Equity for the Years Ended December 31, 2023 and 2022
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2023 and 2022
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(2)Financial Statement Schedules.
Financial statement schedules are omitted because they are not applicable or the required information is shown in the Financial Statements or the Notes thereto.
(3)Exhibits.
Refer to Item 15(b) below.
(b)Exhibits. The following exhibits are either filed herewith or incorporated herein by reference:
Exhibit
Number Description
3.1 Third Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Acacia Research Corporation (incorporated by reference to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 20, 2022)
3.2 Fifth Amended and Restated Bylaws of Acacia Research Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Amendment No.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 2, 2023)
3.3 Certificate of Retirement of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to Amendment No. 1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 2, 2023)
4.1 Description of Acacia Research Corporation Capital Stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019, filed on March 16, 2020)
10.1* Form of Indemnification Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019, filed on March 16, 2020)
10.2* Acacia Research Corporation Amended and Restated Executive Severance Policy (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.26 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, filed on February 26, 2009)
10.3* 2013 Acacia Research Corporation Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Annex A to the Company's Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A filed on April 24, 2013)
10.4* Form of Stock Issuance Agreement under the 2013 Acacia Research Corporation Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K on May 22, 2013)
10.5* 2016 Acacia Research Corporation Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2016, filed on August 9, 2016)
10.6* Form of Stock Option Agreement under the 2016 Acacia Research Corporation Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.24 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016, filed on March 10, 2017)
10.7* Form of Stock Issuance Agreement under the 2016 Acacia Research Corporation Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.25 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016, filed on March 10, 2017)
10.8* Form of Profits Interest Agreement Under AIP Operation LLC Profits Interest Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2017, filed on May 10, 2017)
10.9* Employment Agreement, dated June 19, 2020, by and between Acacia Research Group, LLC and Marc W. Booth (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 25, 2020)
10.10* Employment Agreement, dated June 4, 2020, by and between Acacia Research Group, LLC and Richard Rosenstein (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 4, 2020)
10.11* Separation Agreement and General Release of Claims, effective November 28, 2022, among Acacia Research Group LLC, and Lawrence Wesley Golby (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.17 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2022, filed on March 17, 2023)
10.12* Consulting Agreement, effective January 28, 2023, among Acacia Research Corporation and Richard Rosenstein (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2022, filed on March 17, 2023)
10.13* Employment Agreement, effective March 16, 2021, by and between Acacia Research Group, LLC and Jason Soncini (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 22, 2021)
10.14* Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2023, filed on August 3, 2023)
10.15* Form of Performance-Based Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2023, filed on August 3, 2023)
10.16* Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, effective February 13, 2024, by and between Acacia Research Corporation and Martin D. McNulty, Jr. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 14, 2024)
10.17*# Employment Agreement, effective May 3, 2023, among Acacia Research Corporation and Robert Rasamny (filed herewith as Exhibit 10.17)
10.18 Recapitalization Agreement dated October 30, 2022, by and among Acacia Research Corporation, Starboard Value Partners LP and the investors listed on the Schedule of Investors attached thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 1, 2022)
10.19 Amended and Restated Registration Rights Agreement dated as of February 14, 2023, by and among Acacia Research Corporation and the investors listed on the Schedule of Buyers attached thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 14, 2023)
10.20 Purchase and Sale Agreement dated February 16, 2024 by and between Revolution Resources II, LLC, Revolution II NPI Holding Company, LLC, Jones Energy, LLC, Nosley Assets, LLC, Nosley Acquisition, LLC, and Nosley Midstream, LLC, as Sellers, and BE Anadarko II, LLC, as Buyer (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 20, 2024)
10.21# Services Agreement dated December 12, 2023 by and between Starboard Value LP and Acacia Research Corporation (filed herewith as Exhibit 10.21)
16.1 Letter from BDO USA LLC to the SEC dated September 7, 2022 (incorporated by reference to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 7, 2022)
21.1#
List of Subsidiaries
23.1#
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, GRANT THORNTON LLP
24.1 Power of Attorney (included in the signature page hereto).
31.1#
Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
31.2#
Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
32.1†
Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b)/15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
32.2†
Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b)/15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
97.1# Acacia Research Corporation Compensation Recovery Policy
101#
The following financial statements from the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, formatted in Inline Extensible Business Reporting Language (iXBRL) include: (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) Consolidated Statements of Operations, (iii) Consolidated Statements of Series A Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock and Stockholders' Equity, (iv) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows and (v) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, tagged as blocks of text and including detailed tags.
104#
Cover Page Interactive Data File (formatted in iXBRL and included in Exhibit 101).
____________________
*The referenced exhibit is a management contract, compensatory plan or arrangement required to be filed as an exhibit to this Annual Report on Form 10-K pursuant to Item 15(a)(3) of Form 10-K.
** This filing excludes certain schedules and exhibits pursuant to Item 601(a)(5) of Regulation S-K, which the registrant agrees to furnish supplementally to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request; provided, however, that the registrant may request confidential treatment for any schedules or exhibits so furnished.
# Filed herewith.
†The certifications attached as Exhibits 32.1 and 32.2 that accompany this Annual Report on Form 10-K are not deemed filed with the SEC and are not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of Acacia Research Corporation under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, whether made before or after the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, regardless of any general incorporation language contained in any filing.
(c)Other financial statement schedules.
Not applicable.