EDGAR 10-K Filing

Company CIK: 1479681
Filing Year: 2022
Filename: 1479681_10-K_2022_0001607062-22-000229.json

---

ITEM 1. BUSINESS
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
OUR COMPANY
Introduction
Clinigence Holdings, Inc, is a technology-enabled, risk-bearing population health management company that manages provider networks. Headquartered in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, with the recent acquisitions of Accountable Healthcare Americas, Inc. (“AHA”), AHP Management, Inc. (“AHP”) and Procare Health, Inc. (“Procare”) our subsidiaries include management services organizations (“MSOs”), affiliated independent practice associations (“IPAs”), and a healthcare information technology company providing a cloud-based platform that enables healthcare organizations to provide value-based care and population health management (PHM).
Clinigence and its subsidiaries, and consolidated variable interest entities (“VIEs”), generate revenue by providing administrative, medical management and clinical services to affiliated IPAs and medical groups The administrative services cover billing, collection, accounting, administrative, quality assurance, marketing, compliance and education. Additionally, we provide Software as a Service (SaaS) to health care practices, including accountable care organizations (“ACOs”), 7 Managed Services Organizations (“MSOs”), health plans, hospitals, and individual providers.
We implement and operate different innovative health care models, primarily including the following integrated operations:
• IPAs, which contract with physicians and provide care to Medicare, Medicaid, commercial and dual-eligible patients on a risk- and value-based fee basis;
• MSOs, which provide management, administrative and other support services to our affiliated physician groups such as IPAs;
Subsidiaries
We operate through our subsidiaries, including:
Clinigence Health, Inc. (CHI)
Based in Fort Lauderdale, FL, CHI is a healthcare information technology company providing a cloud-based platform that enables healthcare organizations to provide value-based care and population health management (PHM). Our proprietary cloud-based PHM platform extracts claims and clinical data from multiple claims and EHR systems, which it then uses to report clinical quality measures (GPRO, MIPS, etc.), gaps in care, risk-stratification of patients, generates a utilization dashboard on every provider, has predictive analytics and a provider scorecard. The CHI platform provides SaaS solutions that enable connected intelligence across the care continuum by transforming massive amounts of data into actionable insights. CHI’s solutions help healthcare organizations improve the quality and cost effectiveness of care, enhance population health management and optimize provider networks.
AHP Health Management Services, Inc. (AHP)
Based in Los Angeles, California, AHP’s affiliated IPA, AHISP currently provides care for 22,065 patients, including approximately 1800 Medicare Advantage patients, through a network of 141 primary care physicians and 660 specialists. An IPA is an association of independent physicians, or other organization that contracts with independent physicians, and provides services to HMOs, which are medical insurance groups that provide health services generally for a fixed annual fee, on a negotiated per capita rate, flat retainer fee, or negotiated FFS basis.
Table of Contents 4
Procare Health Inc. (Procare)
Based in Garden Grove, California, Procare is a management services organization (“MSO”) that currently provides services for one health maintenance organization (“HMO”) and three IPAs in Southern and Northern California. MSOs are business organizations that provide the necessary administrative infrastructure and technology for risk-bearing IPAs to function successfully in their relationships with contracted payors and regulatory agencies. MSOs enable physician organizations to succeed in the assumption of financial and population risk, to improve the organization’s performance in care delivery and to provide actionable data analytics. Procare provides claims administration, compliance, credentialing, quality management, utilization management, contracting, provider relations, member services, care management, coding optimization and financial reporting services, among other services.
Investments
Accountable Healthcare America, Inc. (AHA)
Based in Ft. Lauderdale, FL, AHA is a medical management platform company that had an investment in an accountable care organization with approximately (Accountable Care Medical Group of Florida, Inc.” or “ACMG”) 16,000 Medicare members through a network of over 65 providers. Through its investment, AHA provides a suite of services for its providers, including care coordination, high-risk care managers, documentation improvement and medical coding programs, medical management best practices programs, health management programs such as annual wellness visits and chronic care management, and performance improvement plans.
On November 12, 2021, ACMG was sold to Genuine Health Group, LLC for a purchase price of $30 million less costs and adjustments. AHA’s share of the proceeds was $5,887,806. Cash of $4,554,676 was received at Closing, and a receivable of $1,333,130 was recorded. The Stock Purchase Agreement also contains additional earn out consideration payments upon which AHA is expected to receive its pro-rata portion, however, we cannot assign a definitive value to the contingent consideration at this time
Our Revenue Streams
Our revenue reflected in the accompanying consolidated financial statements includes revenue generated by our subsidiaries and consolidated entities. Revenue generated by consolidated entities, however, does not necessarily result in available or distributable cash for the Company. Our revenue streams flow from various multi-year renewable contractual arrangements that vary by type of business operation as follows:
Capitation Revenue
Our capitation revenue comes from our AHP subsidiary and consists primarily of capitated fees for medical services its VIE AHISP provides under capitated arrangements made directly with various managed care providers including HMOs. Capitation revenues are typically prepaid monthly to us based on the number of enrollees selecting us as their healthcare provider. Capitation is a fixed payment amount per patient per unit of time paid in advance for the delivery of health care services, whereby the service providers are generally liable for excess medical costs. The actual amount paid is determined by the ranges of services provided, the number of patients enrolled, and the period of time during which the services are provided. Capitation rates are generally based on local costs and average utilization of services. Because Medicare pays capitation using a “risk adjustment model,” which compensates managed care providers based on the health status (acuity) of each individual enrollee, managed care providers with higher acuity enrollees receive more, and those with lower acuity enrollees receive less, capitation that can be allocated to service providers. Under the risk adjustment model, capitation is paid on an interim basis based on enrollee data submitted for the preceding year and is adjusted in subsequent periods after the final data is compiled.
Table of Contents 5
Per member per month (“PMPM”) managed care contracts generally have a term of one year or longer. All managed care contracts have a single performance obligation that constitutes a series for the provision of managed healthcare services for a population of enrolled members for the duration of the contract. The transaction price for PMPM contracts is variable as it primarily includes PMPM fees associated with unspecified membership that fluctuates throughout the term of the contract. In certain contracts, PMPM fees also include adjustments for items such as performance incentives, performance guarantees and risk shares.
SaaS Subscriptions Revenue
Our SaaS revenue comes from our CHI subsidiary. SaaS-based subscriptions are generally marketed under multi-year agreements with annual, semi-annual, quarterly, or month-to-month renewals and revenue is recognized ratably over the renewal period with the unearned amounts received recorded as deferred revenue.
Management Fee Income
Procare’s revenue is generated primarily through management fees that are received based on Gross Capitation Revenues of the IPA/Physician Groups. Revenue is paid monthly and is a flat fixed rate determined by the agreement. In addition to Management Fees, there is revenue generated through consultant services that are charged as a flat fixed rate and represent a small portion of the total revenue.
Our Key Payors
A limited number of payors represent a significant portion of our net capitation revenue. For the year ended December 31, 2021, two payors accounted for an aggregate of 23% of our total net capitation revenue and in 2022 we expect to derive a significant portion of our revenues from these two payors.
Our Key Customers
In 2020, the largest two SaaS customers represented 24% of revenues during that period.
Our Strengths and Advantages
The combination of the four companies fuses a healthcare information technology company with medical management companies to form a unique, scalable operating platform that we believe is well positioned for the ongoing transition of U.S. healthcare from fee-for-service payments to value-based reimbursements, including full-risk, global capitation models. The platform also addresses another major theme in U.S. healthcare: faced with mounting costs, shifting regulations and burdensome billing, reporting and technology requirements, many physicians and medical groups have been selling their practices to larger hospital systems. The strategy of the combined company is to be one of the few, technology-enabled national medical groups by acquiring and/or operating medical groups, independent practice associations (“IPAs”), accountable care organizations (“ACOs”), management services organizations (“MSOs”) and individual practices, allowing providers to focus on providing the best quality of care to their patients.
Regulatory Environment
The healthcare industry is heavily regulated and closely scrutinized by federal, state and local governments. Comprehensive statutes and regulations govern the manner in which we provide and bill for services and collect reimbursement from governmental programs and private payors, our contractual relationships with our providers, vendors and clients, our marketing activities and other aspects of our operations. Of particular importance are:
• the federal physician self-referral law, commonly referred to as the Stark Law;
• the federal Anti-Kickback Act;
• the criminal healthcare fraud provisions of HIPAA;
• the federal False Claims Act;
• reassignment of payment rules that prohibit certain types of billing and collection;
• similar state law provisions pertaining to anti-kickback, self-referral and false claims issues;
• state laws that prohibit general business corporations, such as us, from practicing medicine;
• laws that regulate debt collection practices as applied to our debt collection practices;
Table of Contents 6
Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act or PPACA
Our revenue will be dependent on the healthcare industry and could be affected by changes in healthcare spending and policy. The healthcare industry is subject to changing political, regulatory and other influences. The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act or PPACA made major changes in how healthcare is delivered and reimbursed and increased access to health insurance benefits to the uninsured and underinsured population of the United States.
	Protected Health Information (PHI)
HIPAA establishes a set of basic national privacy and security standards for the protection of protected health information, or PHI, by health plans, healthcare clearinghouses and certain healthcare providers, referred to as covered entities, and the business associates with whom such covered entities contract for services, which includes us.
Because of the extreme sensitivity of the PHI we store and transmit, the security features of our technology platform are very important. If our security measures, some of which are managed by third parties, are breached or fail, unauthorized persons may be able to obtain access to sensitive client and patient data, including HIPAA-regulated PHI.
Corporate Practice of Medicine
Our consolidated financial statements include our subsidiaries and VIE. Some states have laws that prohibit business entities with non-physician owners, such as Clinigence and its subsidiaries, from practicing medicine, employing physicians to practice medicine, or exercising control over medical decisions by physicians. These laws are generally referred to as corporate practice of medicine laws. States that have corporate practice of medicine laws permit only physicians to practice medicine, exercise control over medical decisions or engage in certain arrangements, such as fee-splitting, with physicians. In these states, a violation of the corporate practice of medicine prohibition constitutes the unlawful practice of medicine, which is a public offense punishable by fines and other criminal penalties. In addition, any physician who participates in a scheme that violates the state’s corporate practice of medicine prohibition may be punished for aiding and abetting a lay entity in the unlawful practice of medicine.
California is a corporate practice of medicine state, and we operate our California based subsidiary AHP by maintaining a long-term MSA with our affiliated IPA, which is owned and operated by physicians only, and employs or contracts with additional physicians to provide medical services. Under the MSA, our wholly owned MSO is contracted to provide non-medical management and administrative services such as financial and risk management as well as information systems, marketing and administrative support to the IPA. The MSA has an initial term of 20 years and is generally not terminable by our affiliated IPA except in the case of bankruptcy, gross negligence, fraud, or other illegal acts by the contracting MSO.
Through the MSA, we have exclusive authority over all non-medical decisions related to the ongoing business operations of the affiliated IPA. Consequently, Clinigence consolidates the revenue and expenses of the affiliated IPA as their primary beneficiary from the date of execution of the MSA.
Under this arrangement our MSO performs only non-medical functions, does not represent to offer medical services, and does not exercise influence or control over the practice of medicine by physicians. The California Medical Board, as well as other states' regulatory bodies, has taken the position that MSAs that confer too much control over a physician practice to MSOs may violate the prohibition against corporate practice of medicine. Some of the relevant laws, regulations, and agency interpretations in California and other states that have corporate practice prohibitions have been subject to limited judicial and regulatory interpretation. Moreover, state laws are subject to change and regulatory authorities. Other parties, including our affiliated IPA, may assert that, despite these arrangements, Clinigence and its subsidiaries are engaged in the prohibited corporate practice of medicine or that such arrangements constitute unlawful fee-splitting between physicians and non-physicians. If this occurred, we could be subject to civil or criminal penalties, our MSA could be found legally invalid and unenforceable in whole or in part, and we could be required to restructure arrangements with our affiliated IPA. If we were required to change our operating structures due to determination that a corporate practice of medicine violation existed, such a restructuring might require revising our MSA terms.
Table of Contents 7
Employees
We presently have 24 total employees all of whom are full-time for operations.
Our Corporate Information
Our principal corporate office is located at 2455 East Sunrise Blvd. Suite 1204 Fort Lauderdale FL, 33304. We maintain a website at www.clinigencehealth.con and make available there, free of charge, our periodic reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), as soon as is reasonably practicable after filing. The SEC maintains a website at http://www.sec.gov that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers such as us that file electronically with the SEC.

---

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
Investing in our common stock involves a high degree of risk. You should carefully consider the risks and uncertainties described below, together with all of the other information in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, including the section titled “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in Part II, Item 7, and our consolidated financial statements and related notes, before making a decision to invest in our common stock The risks and uncertainties described below may not be the only ones we face. If any of the risks actually occur, our business, financial condition, operating results, and prospects could be materially and adversely affected. In that event, the market price of our common stock could decline, and you could lose part or all of your investment.
Summary of Risk Factors
Our business is subject to numerous risks and uncertainties, discussed in more detail in the following section. These risks include, among others, the following key risks:
• The ongoing coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic may negatively impact certain aspects of our business, financial condition, results of operations, and growth.
• Potential changes in laws, accounting principles, and regulations related to VIEs could impact our consolidation of total revenues derived from our affiliated physician groups.
• The arrangements we have with our VIEs are not as secure as direct ownership of such entities.
• We currently derive a substantial portion of our revenues in California and are vulnerable to changes in that state.
• Our business strategy involves acquisitions and strategic partnerships, which can be costly, risky, and complex.
• We may encounter difficulties in managing our growth, and the nature of our business and rapid changes in the healthcare industry make it difficult to reliably predict future growth and operating results.
• We could experience significant losses under capitation contracts if our expenses exceed revenues.
• If our agreements with affiliated physician groups are deemed invalid or are terminated under applicable law, our results of operations and financial condition will be materially impaired.
Table of Contents 8
• Our revenues and operations are dependent on a limited number of key payors.
• We may be impacted by a shift in payor mix, including eligibility changes to government and private insurance programs.
• Many of our agreements with hospitals and medical groups have limited durations, may be terminated without cause by them, and prohibit us from acquiring physicians or patients from or competing with them.
• Changes to federal, state, and local healthcare law, including the ACA and/or the adoption of a primarily publicly funded healthcare system, may negatively impact our business.
• Laws regulating the corporate practice of medicine could restrict the manner in which we are permitted to conduct our business and the failure to comply with such laws could subject us to penalties and restructuring.
• The healthcare industry is intensely regulated at the federal, state, and local levels, and government authorities may determine that we fail to comply with applicable laws or regulations and take actions against us.
• Controls designed to reduce inpatient services and associated costs may reduce our revenues.
• If our affiliated physician groups are not able to satisfy California financial solvency regulations, they could become subject to sanctions and their ability to do business in California could be limited or terminated.
Risks Related to Our General Business and Operations
If our internal controls over financial reporting are not considered effective, our business and stock price could be adversely affected.
We are subject to the reporting requirements of the Exchange Act, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, or the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, and the rules and regulations of the applicable listing standards.. We expect that the requirements of these rules and regulations will continue to increase our legal, accounting, and financial compliance costs; make some activities more difficult, time-consuming, and costly; and strain our personnel, systems, and resources.
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act requires, among other things, that we maintain effective disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting. We are also required to make a formal assessment and provide an annual management report on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. In order to maintain the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting, we have expended, and anticipate that we will continue to expend, resources, including accounting-related costs and management oversight.
Additionally, current controls and any new controls that we develop may become inadequate because of changes in conditions in our business. Further, additional weaknesses in our disclosure controls and internal control over financial reporting may be discovered in the future. Any failure to maintain or develop effective controls or any difficulties encountered in their implementation or improvement could harm our operating results or cause us to fail to meet our reporting obligations and may result in a restatement of our financial statements for prior periods. Any failure to maintain effective internal control over financial reporting also could adversely affect the results of periodic management evaluations regarding the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting.
Uncertain or adverse economic conditions could adversely impact us.
A downturn in economic conditions could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition, business prospects, and stock price. Historically, government budget limitations have resulted in reduced spending. Given that Medicaid is a significant component of state budgets, an economic downturn would put continued cost containment pressures on Medicaid outlays for healthcare services in California. The existing federal deficit and continued deficit spending by the federal government can lead to reduced government expenditures, including for government-funded programs in which we participate such as Medicare. An economic downturn and sustained unemployment may also impact the number of enrollees in managed care programs and the profitability of managed care companies, which could result in reduced reimbursement rates. Although we attempt to stay informed, any sustained failure to identify and respond to these trends could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition, business, and prospects.
Table of Contents 9
Unstable market and economic conditions may have serious adverse consequences on our business, financial condition and results of operations and the price of our common stock.
From time to time, the global credit and financial markets have experienced extreme volatility and disruptions, including severely diminished liquidity and credit availability, declines in consumer confidence, declines in economic growth, increases in unemployment rates and uncertainty about economic stability. There can be no assurance that future deterioration in credit and financial markets and confidence in economic conditions will not occur. Our business strategy and performance may be adversely affected by any such economic downturn, volatile business environment or continued unpredictable and unstable market conditions. The financial markets and the global economy may also be adversely affected by the current or anticipated impact of military conflict, including the conflict between Russia and Ukraine, terrorism or other geopolitical events. Sanctions imposed by the United States and other countries in response to such conflicts, including the conflict in Ukraine, may also adversely impact the financial markets and the global economy, and any economic countermeasures by the affected countries or others could exacerbate market and economic instability. If the current equity and credit markets deteriorate, it may make any necessary debt or equity financing more difficult, more costly and more dilutive. Failure to secure any necessary financing in a timely manner and on favorable terms could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations and the price of our common stock.
The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic may impact certain aspects of our business, financial condition, results of operation, and growth.
The global spread of the COVID-19 pandemic and measures introduced by local, state, and federal governments to contain the virus and mitigate its public health effects have created significant impact to the global economy. We expect the evolving COVID-19 pandemic to continue to impact certain aspects of our business, results of operations, and financial condition and liquidity, but given the uncertainty around the duration and severity of the pandemic, we cannot accurately predict at this time the future potential impact on our business, results of operations, financial condition, and liquidity
Throughout the pandemic, COVID-19 impacted certain aspects of our business as community self-isolation practices and shelter-in-place requirements reduced our inpatient visits. Continued shelter-in-place, quarantine, executive order, or related measures to combat the spread of COVID-19, as well as the perceived need by individuals to continue such practices to avoid infection, among other factors, have impacted and are expected to continue to impact certain aspects of our results of operations, business, and financial condition. These measures and practices resulted in temporary closures of outpatient clinics, and may result in delays in entry into new markets and expansion in existing markets. Governmental authorities in California began reopening and lifting or relaxing shelter-in-place and quarantine measures only to revert back to such restrictions in the face of increases in new COVID-19 cases. In addition, due to the shelter-in-place orders across the country, we have implemented work-from-home policies for many employees, which may impact productivity and disrupt our business operations.
Healthcare organizations around the world, including our medical offices, have faced, and will continue to face, substantial challenges in treating patients with COVID-19, such as the diversion of hospital staff and resources from ordinary functions to the treatment of COVID-19, supply, resource, and capital shortages, and overburdening of staff and resource capacity. In the United States, governmental authorities have also recommended, and in certain cases required, that elective, specialty, and other procedures and appointments, including certain primary care services, be suspended or canceled to avoid non-essential patient exposure to medical environments and potential infection with COVID-19, and to focus limited resources and personnel capacity toward the treatment of COVID-19. Some of these measures and challenges will likely continue for the duration of the pandemic, which is uncertain, and will harm the results of operations, liquidity, and financial condition of these healthcare organizations, including certain of our health network partners. We cannot accurately predict at this time the ultimate severity or duration that the foregoing measures and challenges may have on these healthcare organizations, including us and our health network partners.
Table of Contents 10
The COVID-19 pandemic and similar crises could also diminish the public’s trust in healthcare facilities, especially facilities that fail to accurately or timely diagnose, or are treating (or have treated) patients affected by infectious diseases. As certain of our medical offices treat patients with COVID-19 or other infectious disease, patients may be discouraged from visiting our offices, including cancelling appointments.
Our affiliated physician groups also face an increased risk of infection with COVID-19, which may result in staffing shortages at our offices or increased workers’ compensation claims. While the potential economic impact brought by and the duration of COVID-19 may be difficult to assess or predict, the widespread pandemic has resulted in, and may continue to result in, significant disruption of global financial markets, potentially reducing our ability to access capital, which could in the future negatively affect our liquidity. In addition, a recession or market correction resulting from the spread of COVID-19 could materially affect our business and the value of our common stock.
The global outbreak of COVID-19 continues to rapidly evolve. The ultimate impact of the COVID-19 pandemic or a similar health epidemic is highly uncertain and subject to change. We cannot at this time precisely predict what effects the COVID-19 outbreak will have on certain aspects of our business, results of operations, and financial condition, including due to uncertainties relating to the severity of the disease, the duration of the pandemic, and the governmental responses to the pandemic.
If there is a change in accounting principles or the interpretation thereof affecting consolidation of VIEs, it could impact our consolidation of total revenues derived from our affiliated physician groups.
Our financial statements are consolidated and include the accounts of our majority-wholly owned AHP subsidiary and non-owned affiliated physician group that is a VIE, which consolidation is effectuated in accordance with applicable accounting rules promulgated by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”). Such accounting rules require that, under some circumstances, the VIE consolidation model be applied when a reporting enterprise holds a variable interest (e.g., equity interests, debt obligations, certain management, and service contracts) in a legal entity. Under this model, an enterprise must assess the entity in which it holds a variable interest to determine whether it meets the criteria to be consolidated as a VIE. If the entity is a VIE, the consolidation framework next identifies the party, if one exists, that possesses a controlling financial interest in the VIE, and then requires that party to consolidate as the primary beneficiary. An enterprise’s determination of whether it has a controlling financial interest in a VIE requires that a qualitative determination be made and is not solely based on voting rights. If an enterprise determines the entity in which it holds a variable interest is not subject to the VIE consolidation model, the enterprise should apply the traditional voting control model which focuses on voting rights.
In our case, the VIE consolidation model applies to our controlled, but not owned, physician-affiliated entity. Our determination regarding the consolidation of our affiliate, however, could be challenged, which could have a material adverse effect on our operations. In addition, in the event of a change in accounting rules or FASB’s interpretations thereof, or if there were an adverse determination by a regulatory agency or a court or a change in state or federal law relating to the ability to maintain present agreements or arrangements with our affiliated physician group, we may not be permitted to continue to consolidate the revenues of our VIE.
Table of Contents 11
Our business will be subject to the risks of earthquakes, fire, floods and other natural catastrophic events, health epidemics or pandemics, and to interruption by man-made problems such as power disruptions, computer viruses, data security breaches or terrorism.
We expect to have facilities located in the Southeast United States, including Florida, a region known for hurricane activity and Los Angeles California, a region known for earthquakes and wildfires. A significant natural disaster, such as a hurricane, earthquake, wildfire,or flood, occurring at our headquarters, at one of our other facilities or where a business partner is located could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition. Further, if a natural disaster, health epidemics or pandemic, or man-made problem were to affect our network service providers or Internet service providers, this could adversely affect the ability of our customers to use our products and platform. In addition, health epidemics or pandemics, natural disasters and acts of terrorism could cause disruptions in our business, or the businesses of our customers or service providers. We also expect to rely on our network and third-party infrastructure and enterprise applications and internal technology systems for our engineering, sales and marketing and operations activities. Although we maintain incident management and disaster response plans, in the event of a major disruption caused by a health epidemic or pandemic, natural disaster or man-made problem, we may be unable to continue our operations and may endure system interruptions, reputational harm, delays in our development activities, lengthy interruptions in service, breaches of data security and loss of critical data, any of which could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Breaches or compromises of our information security systems or our information technology systems or infrastructure could result in exposure of private information, disruption of our business, and damage to our reputation, which could harm our business, results of operation, and financial condition
As a routine part of our business, we utilize information security and information technology systems and websites that allow for the secure storage and transmission of proprietary or private information regarding our patients, employees, vendors, and others, including individually identifiable health information. A security breach of our network, hosted service providers, or vendor systems, may expose us to a risk of loss or misuse of this information, litigation, and potential liability. Hackers and data thieves are increasingly sophisticated and operate large-scale and complex automated attacks, including on companies within the healthcare industry. Although we believe that we take appropriate measures to safeguard sensitive information within our possession, we may not have the resources or technical sophistication to anticipate or prevent rapidly evolving types of cyber-attacks targeted at us, our patients, or others who have entrusted us with information. Actual or anticipated attacks may cause us to incur costs, including costs to deploy additional personnel and protection technologies, train employees, and engage third-party experts and consultants. We invest in industry-standard security technology to protect personal information. Advances in computer capabilities, new technological discoveries, or other developments may result in the technology used by us to protect personal information or other data being breached or compromised. In addition, data and security breaches can also occur as a result of non-technical failures. To our knowledge, we have not experienced any material breach of our cybersecurity systems. If we or our third-party service providers systems fail to operate effectively or are damaged, destroyed, or shut down, or there are problems with transitioning to upgraded or replacement systems, or there are security breaches in these systems, any of the aforementioned could occur as a result of natural disasters, software or equipment failures, telecommunications failures, loss or theft of equipment, acts of terrorism, circumvention of security systems, or other cyberattacks, we could experience delays or decreases in service, and reduced efficiency of our operations. Additionally, any of these events could lead to violations of privacy laws, loss of customers, or loss, misappropriation or corruption of confidential information, trade secrets or data, which could expose us to potential litigation, regulatory actions, sanctions, or other statutory penalties, any or all of which could adversely affect our business and cause it to incur significant losses and remediation costs.
We rely on complex software systems and hosted applications to operate our business, and our business may be disrupted if we are unable to successfully or efficiently update these systems or convert to new systems.
We are increasingly dependent on technology systems to operate our business, reduce costs, and enhance customer service. These systems include complex software systems and hosted applications that are provided by third parties. Software systems need to be updated on a regular basis with patches, bug fixes, and other modifications. Hosted applications are subject to service availability and reliability of hosting environments. We also migrate from legacy systems to new systems from time to time. Maintaining existing software systems, implementing upgrades, and converting to new systems are costly and require personnel and other resources. The implementation of these systems upgrades, and conversions is a complex and time-consuming project involving substantial expenditures for implementation activities, consultants, system hardware and software, often requires transforming our current business and processes to conform to new systems, and therefore, may take longer, be more disruptive, and cost more than forecast and may not be successful. If the implementation is delayed or otherwise is not successful, it may hinder our business operations and negatively affect our financial condition and results of operations. There are many factors that may materially and adversely affect the schedule, cost, and execution of the implementation process, including, without limitation, problems in the design and testing of new systems; system delays and malfunctions; the deviation by suppliers and contractors from the required performance under their contracts with us; the diversion of management attention from our daily operations to the implementation project; reworks due to unanticipated changes in business processes; difficulty in training employees in the operation of new systems and maintaining internal control while converting from legacy systems to new systems; and integration with our existing systems. Some of such factors may not be reasonably anticipated or may be beyond our control.
Table of Contents 12
We may be unable to renew our leases on favorable terms or at all as our leases expire, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
We operate several leased premises. There is no assurance that we will be able to continue to occupy such premises in the future. We may be unable to timely renew such leases or renew them on favorable terms, if at all. If any current lease is terminated or not renewed, we may be required to relocate our operations at
substantial costs or incur increased rental expenses, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
We currently derive a substantial portion of our revenues in California and are vulnerable to changes in that state.
We primarily operate in California. Any material changes with respect to consumer preferences, taxation, reimbursements, financial requirements, or other aspects of the healthcare delivery in California or the state’s economic conditions could have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations, and financial condition.
Our success depends, to a significant degree, upon our ability to adapt to the ever-changing healthcare industry and continued development of additional services.
Although we expect to provide a broad and competitive range of services, there can be no assurance of acceptance of current services by the marketplace. Our ability to procure new contracts may be dependent upon the continuing results achieved at the current facilities, upon pricing and operational considerations, and the potential need for continuing improvement to our existing services. Moreover, the markets for our new services may not develop as expected nor can there be any assurance that we will be successful in marketing any such services
Risks related to the Healthcare Industry
The healthcare industry is highly competitive.
We compete directly with national, regional, and local providers of inpatient healthcare for patients and physicians. There are many other companies and individuals currently providing healthcare services, many of which have been in business longer and/or have substantially more resources. Since there are virtually no substantial capital expenditures required for providing healthcare services, there are few financial barriers to entry the healthcare industry. Other companies could enter the healthcare industry in the future and divert some or all of our business. We also compete with physician groups and privately-owned healthcare companies in local markets. In addition, our relationships with governmental and private third-party payors are not exclusive and our competitors have established or could seek to establish relationships with such payors to serve their covered patients. Competitors may also seek to compete with us for acquisitions, which could have the effect of increasing the price and reducing the number of suitable acquisitions, which would have an adverse impact on our growth strategy. Individual physicians, physician groups, and companies in other healthcare industry segments, including those with which we have contracts, and some of which have greater financial, marketing, and staffing resources, may become competitors in providing healthcare services, and this competition may have a material adverse effect on our business operations and financial position.
We therefore may be unable to compete successfully and even after we expend significant resources.
Table of Contents 13
New physicians and other providers must be properly enrolled in governmental healthcare programs before we can receive reimbursement for their services, and there may be delays in the enrollment process.
Each time a new physician joins us or our affiliated groups, we must enroll the physician under our applicable group identification number for Medicare and Medicaid programs and for certain managed care and private insurance programs before we can receive reimbursement for services the physician renders to beneficiaries of those programs. The estimated time to receive approval for the enrollment is sometimes difficult to predict and, in recent years, the Medicare program carriers often have not issued these numbers to our affiliated physicians in a timely manner. These practices result in delayed reimbursement that may adversely affect our cash flows.
Changes associated with reimbursements by third-party payors may adversely affect our operations.
The medical services industry is undergoing significant changes with government and other third-party payors that are taking measures to reduce reimbursement rates or, in some cases, denying reimbursement altogether. There is no assurance that government or other third-party payors will continue to pay for the services provided by our affiliated medical groups. Furthermore, there has been, and continues to be, a great deal of discussion and debate about the repeal and replacement of existing government reimbursement programs, such as the ACA. As a result, the future of healthcare reimbursement programs is uncertain, making long-term business planning difficult and imprecise. The failure of government or other third-party payors to cover adequately the medical services provided by us could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, and financial condition.
Our business may be significantly and adversely affected by legislative initiatives aimed at or having the effect of reducing healthcare costs associated with Medicare and other government healthcare programs and changes in reimbursement policies. In order to participate in the Medicare program, we must comply with stringent and often complex enrollment and reimbursement requirements. These programs generally provide for reimbursement on a fee-schedule basis rather than on a charge-related basis. As a result, we cannot increase our revenue by increasing the amount that we and our affiliates charge for services. To the extent that our costs increase, we may not be able to recover the increased costs from these programs. In addition, cost containment measures in non-governmental insurance plans have generally restricted our ability to recover, or shift to non-governmental payors, these increased costs. In attempts to limit federal and state spending, there have been, and we expect that there will continue to be, a number of proposals to limit or reduce Medicare reimbursement for various services. For example, the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015 made numerous changes to Medicare, Medicaid, and other healthcare-related programs, including new systems for establishing annual updates to Medicare rates for physicians’ services.
We may have difficulty collecting payments from third-party payors in a timely manner.
We derive significant revenue from third-party payors, and delays in payment or refunds to payors may adversely impact our net revenue. We assume the financial risks relating to uncollectible and delayed payments. In particular, we rely on some key governmental payors. Governmental payors typically pay on a more extended payment cycle, which could require us to incur substantial expenses prior to receiving corresponding payments. In the current healthcare environment, as payors continue to control expenditures for healthcare services, including through revising their coverage and reimbursement policies, we may continue to experience difficulties in collecting payments from payors that may seek to reduce or delay such payments. If we are not timely paid in full or if we need to refund some payments, our revenues, cash flows, and financial condition could be adversely affected.
Table of Contents 14
Decreases in payor rates could adversely affect us.
Decreases in payor rates, either prospectively or retroactively, could have a significant adverse effect on our revenues, cash flows, and results of operations.
Federal and state laws may limit our ability to collect monies owed by patients.
We use third-party collection agencies whom we do not control to collect from patients any co-payments and other payments for services that our physicians provide. The federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act of 1977 (the “FDCPA”) restricts the methods that third-party collection companies may use to contact and seek payment from consumer debtors regarding past due accounts. State laws vary with respect to debt collection practices, although most state requirements are similar to those under the FDCPA. Therefore, such agencies may not be successful in collecting payments owed to us and our affiliated physician groups. If practices of collection agencies utilized by us are inconsistent with these standards, we may be subject to actual damages and penalties. These factors and events could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, and financial condition.
We have established reserves for our potential medical claim losses, which are subject to inherent uncertainties, and a deficiency in the established reserves may lead to a reduction in our assets or net incomes.
We establish reserves for estimated IBNR claims. IBNR estimates are developed using actuarial methods and are based on many variables, including the utilization of healthcare services, historical payment patterns, cost trends, product mix, seasonality, changes in membership, and other factors. The estimation methods and the resulting reserves are periodically reviewed and updated.
Many of our contracts are complex in nature and may be subject to differing interpretations regarding amounts due for the provision of various services. Such interpretations may not come to light until a substantial period of time has passed. The inherent difficulty in interpreting contracts and estimating necessary reserves could result in significant fluctuations in our estimates from period to period. Our actual losses and related expenses therefore may differ, even substantially, from the reserve estimates reflected in our financial statements. If actual claims exceed our estimated reserves, we may be required to increase reserves, which would lead to a reduction in our assets or net income.
Competition for qualified physicians, employees, and management personnel is intense in the healthcare industry, and we may not be able to hire and retain qualified physicians and other personnel.
We depend on our affiliated physicians to provide services and generate revenue. We compete with many types of healthcare providers, including teaching, research and government institutions, hospitals, and other practice groups, for the services of clinicians and management personnel. The limited number of residents and other licensed providers on the job market with the expertise necessary to provide services within our business makes it challenging to meet our hiring needs and may require us to train new employees, contract temporary physicians, or offer more attractive wage and benefit packages to experienced professionals, which could decrease our profit margins. The limited number of available residents and other licensed providers also impacts our ability to renew contracts with existing physicians on acceptable terms. As a result, our ability to provide services could be adversely affected. Even though our physician turnover rate has remained stable over the last three years, if the turnover rate were to increase significantly, our growth could be adversely affected. Moreover, unlike some of our competitors who sometimes pay additional compensation to physicians who agree to provide services exclusively to that competitor, our affiliated IPAs have historically not entered into such exclusivity agreements and have allowed our affiliated physicians to affiliate with multiple IPAs. This practice may place us at a competitive disadvantage regarding the hiring and retention of physicians relative to those competitors who do enter into such exclusivity agreements.
The healthcare industry is increasingly reliant on technology, which could increase our risks.
The role of technology is greatly increasing in the delivery of healthcare, which makes it difficult for traditional physician-driven companies, such as us, to adopt and integrate electronic health records, databases, cloud-based billing systems, and many other technology applications in the delivery of healthcare services. Additionally, consumers are using mobile applications and care and cost research in selecting and usage of healthcare services. We may need to incur significant costs to implement these technology applications and comply with applicable laws. For example, the nature of our business and the requirements of healthcare privacy laws impose significant obligations on us to maintain privacy and protection of patient medical information. We rely on employees and third parties with technology knowledge and expertise and could be at risk if technology applications are not properly established, maintained, or secured. Any cybersecurity incident, even unintended, could expose us to significant fines and remediation costs and materially impair our business operations and financial position.
Table of Contents 15
If we are unable to effectively adapt to changes in the healthcare industry, including changes to laws and regulations regarding or affecting the U.S. healthcare reform, our business may be harmed.
Due to the importance of the healthcare industry in the lives of all Americans, federal, state, and local legislative bodies frequently pass legislation and promulgate regulations relating to healthcare reform or that affect the healthcare industry. As has been the trend in recent years, it is reasonable to assume that there will continue to be increased government oversight and regulation of the healthcare industry in the future. We cannot assure our stockholders as to the ultimate content, timing, or effect of any new healthcare legislation or regulations, nor is it possible at this time to estimate the impact of potential new legislation or regulations on our business. It is possible that future legislation enacted by Congress or state legislatures, or regulations promulgated by regulatory authorities at the federal or state level, could adversely affect our business or could change the operating environment of the hospitals and other facilities where our affiliated physicians provide services. It is possible that the changes to the Medicare, Medicaid, or other governmental healthcare program reimbursements may serve as precedent to possible changes in other payors’ reimbursement policies in a manner adverse to us. Similarly, changes in private payor reimbursements could lead to adverse changes in Medicare, Medicaid, and other governmental healthcare programs, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Although we do not anticipate that a single-payer national health insurance system will be enacted by the current Congress, several legislative initiatives have been proposed by members of Congress and presidential candidates that would establish some form of a single public or quasi-public agency that organizes healthcare financing, but under which healthcare delivery would remain private. If enacted, such a system could adversely affect our business.
Consolidation in the healthcare industry could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Many healthcare industry participants and payers are consolidating to create larger and more integrated healthcare delivery systems with greater market power. We expect regulatory and economic conditions to result in additional consolidation in the healthcare industry in the future. As consolidation accelerates, the economies of scale of our partners’ organizations may grow. If a partner experiences sizable growth following consolidation, it may determine that it no longer needs to rely on us and may reduce its demand for our products and services. In addition, as healthcare providers consolidate to create larger and more integrated healthcare delivery systems with greater market power, these providers may try to use their market power to negotiate fee reductions for our products and services. Finally, consolidation may also result in the acquisition or future development by our partners of products and services that compete with our products and services. Any of these potential results of consolidation could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Table of Contents 16
Risks Relating to Regulatory Compliance
Laws regulating the corporate practice of medicine could restrict the manner in which we are permitted to conduct our business and the failure to comply with such laws could subject us to penalties and restructuring.
Some states have laws that prohibit business entities from practicing medicine, employing physicians to practice medicine, exercising control over medical decisions by physicians (also known collectively as the corporate practice of medicine) or engaging in some arrangements, such as fee-splitting, with physicians. In some states these prohibitions are expressly stated in a statute or regulation, while in other states the prohibition is a matter of judicial or regulatory interpretation. California is one of the states that prohibit the corporate practice of medicine.
In California, we operate by maintaining contracts with our affiliated physician group, which is each owned and operated by physicians and which employ or contract with additional physicians to provide physician services. Under this arrangement, our subsidiary provides management services, receives a management fee for providing management services, does not represent to offer medical services, and does not exercise influence or control over the practice of medicine by the physician or the affiliated physician groups. Accordingly, we do not directly own any equity interests in out affiliated physician group in California. In the event that the affiliated physician group arrangement is terminated, we are unable to enforce such arrangement, or the arrangement is invalidated under applicable laws, there could be a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, and financial condition and we may have to restructure our organization and change our arrangements with our affiliated physician group, which may not be successful.
We conduct business in a heavily regulated industry and if we fail to comply with these laws and government regulations, we could incur penalties or be required to make significant changes to our operations or experience adverse publicity, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
The healthcare industry is heavily regulated and closely scrutinized by federal, state and local governments. Comprehensive statutes and regulations govern the manner in which we provide and bill for services and collect reimbursement from governmental programs and private payors, our contractual relationships with our providers, vendors and clients, our marketing activities and other aspects of our operations. Of particular importance are:
• the False Claims Act, that provides for penalties against entities and individuals who knowingly or recklessly make claims to Medicare, Medicaid, and other governmental healthcare programs, as well as third-party payors, that contain or are based upon false or fraudulent information;
• a provision of the Social Security Act, commonly referred to as the “Anti-Kickback Statute,” that prohibits the knowing and willful offering, payment, solicitation, or receipt of any bribe, kickback, rebate, or other remuneration, in cash or in kind, in return for the referral or recommendation of patients for items and services covered, in or in part, by federal healthcare programs such as Medicare and Medicaid;
• a provision of the Social Security Act, commonly referred to as the Stark Law or physician self-referral law, that (subject to limited exceptions) prohibits physicians from referring Medicare patients to an entity for the provision of specific “designated health services” if the physician or a member of such physician’s immediate family has a direct or indirect financial relationship with the entity, and prohibits the entity from billing for services arising out of such prohibited referrals;
• a provision of the Social Security Act that provides for criminal penalties on healthcare providers who fail to disclose known overpayments;
Table of Contents 17
• a provision of the Social Security Act that provides for civil monetary penalties on healthcare providers who fail to repay known overpayments within 60 days of identification or the date any corresponding cost report was due, if applicable, and also allows improper retention of known overpayments to serve as a basis for False Claims Act violations;
• provisions of the Social Security Act (emanating from the DRA) that require entities that make or receive annual Medicaid payments of $5 million or more from a single Medicaid program to provide its employees, contractors, and agents with written policies and employee handbook materials on federal and state false claims acts and related statutes, that establish a new Medicaid Integrity Program designed to enhance federal and state efforts to detect Medicaid fraud, waste, and abuse, and that increase financial incentives for both states and individuals to bring fraud and abuse claims against healthcare companies;
• state law provisions pertaining to anti-kickback, self-referral, and false claims issues;
• provisions of, and regulations relating to, HIPAA that provide penalties for knowingly and willfully executing a scheme or artifice to defraud a healthcare
• benefit program or falsifying, concealing, or covering up a material fact or making any material false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement in connection with the delivery of or payment for healthcare benefits, items, or services;
• provisions of HIPAA and the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act of 2009 (“HITECH”) limiting how covered entities, business associates, and business associate sub-contractors may use and disclose PHI and the security measures that must be taken in connection with protecting that information and related systems, as well as similar or more stringent state laws;
• federal and state laws that provide penalties for providers for billing and receiving payments from a governmental healthcare program for services unless the services are medically necessary and reasonable, adequately and accurately documented, and billed using codes that accurately reflect the type and level of services rendered;
• state laws that provide for financial solvency requirements relating to risk-bearing organizations (“RBOs”), plan operations, plan-affiliate operations and transactions, plan-provider contractual relationships, and provider-affiliate operations and transactions, such as California Business & Professions Code Section 1375.4 (§ 1375.4; Cal. Code Regs., tit. 28, § 1300.75.4 et seq.);
• federal laws that provide for administrative sanctions, including civil monetary penalties for, among other violations, inappropriate billing of services to federal healthcare programs, payments by hospitals to physicians for reducing or limiting services to Medicare or Medicaid patients, or employing or contracting with individuals or entities who/which are excluded from participation in federal healthcare programs;
• federal and state laws and policies that require healthcare providers to enroll in the Medicare and Medicaid programs before submitting any claims for services, to promptly report certain changes in its operations to the agencies that administer these programs, and to re-enroll in these programs when changes in direct or indirect ownership occur or in response to revalidation requests from Medicare and Medicaid;
• state laws that prohibit general business entities from practicing medicine, controlling physicians’ medical decisions or engaging in certain practices, such as splitting fees with physicians;
Table of Contents 18
• state laws that require timely payment of claims, including §1371.38, et al, of the California Health & Safety Code, which imposes time limits for the payment of uncontested covered claims and required healthcare service plans to pay interest on uncontested claims not paid promptly within the required time period;
• laws in some states that prohibit non-domiciled entities from owning and operating medical practices in such states;
• federal and state laws and regulations restricting the techniques that may be used to collect past due accounts from consumers, such as our patients, for services provided to the consumer; and
• state laws that require healthcare providers that assume professional and institutional risk (i.e., global risk) to either obtain a license under the Knox-Keene Health Care Service Plan Act of 1975 or receive an exemption from the California Department of Managed Healthcare (“DMHC”) for the contract(s) under which the entity assumes global risk.
Any violation or alleged violation of any of these laws or regulations by us or our affiliates could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Because of the breadth of these laws and the narrowness of the statutory exceptions and safe harbors available, it is possible that some of our business activities could be subject to challenge under one or more of such laws. Achieving and sustaining compliance with these laws may prove costly. Failure to comply with these laws and other laws can result in civil and criminal penalties such as fines, damages, overpayment recoupment loss of enrollment status and exclusion from the Medicare and Medicaid programs. The risk of our being found in violation of these laws and regulations is increased by the fact that many of them have not been fully interpreted by the regulatory authorities or the courts, and their provisions are sometimes open to a variety of interpretations. Our failure to accurately anticipate the application of these laws and regulations to our business or any other failure to comply with regulatory requirements could create liability for us and negatively affect our business. Any action against us for violation of these laws or regulations, even if we successfully defend against it, could cause us to incur significant legal expenses, divert our management’s attention from the operation of our business and result in adverse publicity.
To enforce compliance with the federal laws, the U.S. Department of Justice and the OIG, have recently increased their scrutiny of healthcare providers, which has led to a number of investigations, prosecutions, convictions and settlements in the healthcare industry. Dealing with investigations can be time- and resource-consuming and can divert management’s attention from the business. Any such investigation or settlement could increase our costs or otherwise have an adverse effect on our business. In addition, because of the potential for large monetary exposure under the federal False Claims Act, which provides for treble damages and mandatory minimum penalties of $5,500 to $11,000 per false claim or statement, healthcare providers often resolve allegations without admissions of liability for significant and material amounts to avoid the uncertainty of treble damages that may be awarded in litigation proceedings. Such settlements often contain additional compliance and reporting requirements as part of a consent decree, settlement agreement or corporate integrity agreement. Given the significant size of actual and potential settlements, it is expected that the government will continue to devote substantial resources to investigating healthcare providers’ compliance with the healthcare reimbursement rules and fraud and abuse laws.
The laws, regulations and standards governing the provision of healthcare services may change significantly in the future. We cannot assure you that any new or changed healthcare laws, regulations or standards will not materially adversely affect our business. We cannot assure you that a review of our business by judicial, law enforcement, regulatory or accreditation authorities will not result in a determination that could adversely affect our operations.
Table of Contents 19
The impact of recent healthcare reform legislation and other changes in the healthcare industry and in healthcare spending in the US is currently unknown, but may adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our revenue will be dependent on the healthcare industry and could be affected by changes in healthcare spending and policy. The healthcare industry is subject to changing political, regulatory and other influences. The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act or ACA made major changes in how healthcare is delivered and reimbursed and increased access to health insurance benefits to the uninsured and underinsured population of the United States.
The ACA, among other things, increased the number of individuals with Medicaid and private insurance coverage, implemented reimbursement policies that tie payment to quality, facilitated the creation of accountable care organizations that may use capitation and other alternative payment methodologies, strengthened enforcement of fraud, and abuse laws and encouraged the use of information technology. Several of these changes require implementing regulations which have not yet been drafted or have been released only as proposed rules.
Such changes in the regulatory environment may also result in changes to our payor mix that may affect our operations and revenue.
In addition, certain provisions of the ACA authorize voluntary demonstration projects, which include the development of bundling payments for acute, inpatient hospital services, physician services and post-acute services for episodes of hospital care. Further, the ACA may adversely affect payors by increasing medical costs generally, which could have an effect on the industry and potentially impact our business and revenue as payors seek to offset these increases by reducing costs in other areas. The full impact of these changes on us cannot be determined at this time.
We expect that additional state and federal healthcare reform measures will be adopted in the future, any of which could limit the amounts that federal and state governments and other third-party payors will pay for healthcare products and services, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Compliance with federal and state privacy and data security laws is expensive, and we may be subject to government or private actions due to privacy and security breaches.
Numerous state and federal laws and regulations govern the collection, dissemination, use, privacy, confidentiality, security, availability and integrity of personally identifiable information, or PII, including protected health information. These laws and regulations include HIPAA. HIPAA establishes a set of basic national privacy and security standards for the protection of protected health information, or PHI, by health plans, healthcare clearinghouses and certain healthcare providers, referred to as covered entities, and the business associates with whom such covered entities contract for services, which includes us.
HIPAA requires healthcare providers like us to develop and maintain policies and procedures with respect to PHI that is used or disclosed, including the adoption of administrative, physical and technical safeguards to protect such information. HIPAA also implemented the use of standard transaction code sets and standard identifiers that covered entities must use when submitting or receiving certain electronic healthcare transactions, including activities associated with the billing and collection of healthcare claims.
HIPAA imposes mandatory penalties for certain violations. Penalties for violations of HIPAA and its implementing regulations start at $100 per violation and are not to exceed $50,000 per violation, subject to a cap of $1.5 million for violations of the same standard in a single calendar year. However, a single breach incident can result in violations of multiple standards. HIPAA also authorizes state attorneys general to file suit on behalf of their residents. Courts are able to award damages, costs and attorneys’ fees related to violations of HIPAA in such cases. While HIPAA does not create a private right of action allowing individuals to sue us in civil court for violations of HIPAA, its standards have been used as the basis for duty of care in state civil suits such as those for negligence or recklessness in the misuse or breach of PHI.
In addition, HIPAA mandates that the Secretary of Health and Human Services, or HHS conduct periodic compliance audits of HIPAA covered entities or business associates for compliance with the HIPAA Privacy and Security Standards. It also tasks HHS with establishing a methodology whereby harmed individuals who were the victims of breaches of unsecured PHI may receive a percentage of the Civil Monetary Penalty fine paid by the violator.
Table of Contents 20
HIPAA further requires that patients be notified of any unauthorized acquisition, access, use or disclosure of their unsecured PHI that compromises the privacy or security of such information, with certain exceptions related to unintentional or inadvertent use or disclosure by employees or authorized individuals. HIPAA specifies that such notifications must be made “without unreasonable delay and in no case later than 60 calendar days after discovery of the breach.” If a breach affects 500 patients or more, it must be reported to HHS without unreasonable delay, and HHS will post the name of the breaching entity on its public web site. Breaches affecting 500 patients or more in the same state or jurisdiction must also be reported to the local media. If a breach involves fewer than 500 people, the covered entity must record it in a log and notify HHS at least annually.
Numerous other federal and state laws protect the confidentiality, privacy, availability, integrity and security of PII, including PHI. These laws in many cases are more restrictive than, and may not be preempted by, the HIPAA rules and may be subject to varying interpretations by courts and government agencies, creating complex compliance issues for us and our Clients and potentially exposing us to additional expense, adverse publicity and liability.
New health information standards, whether implemented pursuant to HIPAA, congressional action or otherwise, could have a significant effect on the manner in which we must handle healthcare related data, and the cost of complying with standards could be significant. If we do not comply with existing or new laws and regulations related to PHI, we could be subject to criminal or civil sanctions.
Because of the extreme sensitivity of the PII we store and transmit, the security features of our technology platform are very important. If our security measures, some of which are managed by third parties, are breached or fail, unauthorized persons may be able to obtain access to sensitive client and patient data, including HIPAA-regulated PHI. As a result, our reputation could be severely damaged, adversely affecting client and patient confidence. Members may curtail their use of or stop using our services or our client base could decrease, which would cause our business to suffer. In addition, we could face litigation, damages for contract breach, penalties and regulatory actions for violation of HIPAA and other applicable laws or regulations and significant costs for remediation, notification to individuals and for measures to prevent future occurrences. Any potential security breach could also result in increased costs associated with liability for stolen assets or information, repairing system damage that may have been caused by such breaches, incentives offered to clients or other business partners in an effort to maintain our business relationships after a breach and implementing measures to prevent future occurrences, including organizational changes, deploying additional personnel and protection technologies, training employees and engaging third-party experts and consultants. While we maintain insurance covering certain security and privacy damages and claim expenses in the amount of at least $3.0 million, we may not carry insurance or maintain coverage sufficient to compensate for all liability and in any event, insurance coverage would not address the reputational damage that could result from a security incident.
We outsource important aspects of the storage and transmission of Client and Member information, and thus rely on third parties to manage functions that have material cyber-security risks. We attempt to address these risks by requiring outsourcing subcontractors who handle client and patient information to sign business associate agreements contractually requiring those subcontractors to adequately safeguard personal health data to the same extent that applies to us and in some cases by requiring such outsourcing subcontractors to undergo third-party security examinations. In addition, we periodically hire third-party security experts to assess and test our security posture. However, we cannot assure you that these contractual measures and other safeguards will adequately protect us from the risks associated with the storage and transmission of client and patient’s proprietary and protected health information.
In addition, various states have enacted laws governing the privacy of personal information collected and used by businesses online. For example, California has recently adopted the California Consumer Privacy Act of 2018, which went into effect on January 1, 2020. This law, in part, requires that companies make certain disclosures to consumers via their privacy policies, or otherwise at the time the personal data is collected. The Company will have to determine what personal data it is collecting from individuals and for what purposes, and to update its privacy policy every 12 months to make the required disclosures, among other things. Since this law is newly enacted and has not yet gone into effect, it is unclear whether it will have any material impact on the Company’s business and operations.
Table of Contents 21
Healthcare providers could be subject to federal and state investigations and payor audits.
Due to our affiliates’ participation in government and private healthcare programs, we are from time to time involved in inquiries, reviews, audits, and investigations by governmental agencies and private payors of our business practices, including assessments of our compliance with coding, billing, and documentation requirements. Federal and state government agencies have active civil and criminal enforcement efforts against healthcare companies, and their executives and managers. The DRA, which provides a financial incentive to states to enact their own false claims acts, and similar laws encourage investigations against healthcare companies by different agencies. These investigations could also be initiated by private whistleblowers. Responding to audit and investigative activities are costly and disruptive to our business operations, even when the allegations are without merit. If we are subject to an audit or investigation, a finding could be made that we or our affiliates erroneously billed or were incorrectly reimbursed, and we may be required to repay such agencies or payors, may be subjected to pre-payment reviews, which can be time-consuming and result in non-payment or delayed payments for the services we or our affiliates provide, and may be subject to financial sanctions or required to modify our operations.
Controls designed to reduce inpatient services and associated costs may reduce our revenues.
Controls imposed by Medicare, Medicaid, and private payors designed to reduce admissions and lengths of stay, commonly referred to as “utilization review,” have affected and are expected to continue to affect our operations. Federal law contains numerous provisions designed to ensure that services rendered by hospitals and other care providers to Medicare and Medicaid patients meet professionally recognized standards and are medically necessary and that claims for reimbursement are properly filed. These provisions include a requirement that a sampling of admissions of Medicare and Medicaid patients must be reviewed by quality improvement organizations, which review the appropriateness of Medicare and Medicaid patient admissions and discharges, the quality of care provided, and the appropriateness of cases of extraordinary length of stay or cost on a post-discharge basis. Quality improvement organizations may deny payment for services or assess fines and also have the authority to recommend to the HHS that a provider is in substantial non-compliance with the standards of the quality improvement organization and should be excluded from participation in the Medicare program. The ACA potentially expands the use of prepayment review by Medicare contractors by eliminating statutory restrictions on its use, and, as a result, efforts to impose more stringent cost controls are expected to continue. Utilization review is also a requirement of most non-governmental managed care organizations and other third-party payors. Inpatient utilization, average lengths of stay and occupancy rates continue to be negatively affected by payor-required pre-admission authorization and utilization review and by third party payor pressure to maximize outpatient and alternative healthcare delivery services for less acutely ill patients. Although we are unable to predict the effect these controls and any changes thereto may have on our operations, significant limits on the scope of our services reimbursed and on reimbursement rates and fees could have a material, adverse effect on our business, financial position, and results of operations.
We do not have a Knox-Keene license.
The Knox-Keene Health Care Service Plan Act of 1975 was passed by the California State Legislature to regulate California managed care plans and is currently administered by the DMHC. A Knox-Keene Act license is required to operate a healthcare service plan, e.g., an HMO, or an organization that accepts global risk, i.e., accepts full risk for a patient population, including risk related to institutional services, e.g., hospital, and professional services. Applying for and obtaining such a license is a time consuming and detail-oriented undertaking. We currently do not hold any Knox-Keene license. If the DMHC were to determine that we have been inappropriately taking risk for institutional and professional services as a result of our various hospital and physician arrangements without having any Knox-Keene license or applicable regulatory exemption, we may be required to obtain a Knox-Keene license and could be subject to civil and criminal liability, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, and financial condition.
Table of Contents 22
A Knox-Keene Act license or exemption from licensure, where applicable, is required to operate a healthcare service plan, e.g., an HMO, or an organization that accepts global risk, i.e., accepts full risk for a patient population, including risk related to institutional services, e.g., hospital, and professional services.
If our affiliated physician group is not able to satisfy California financial solvency regulations, they could become subject to sanctions and their ability to do business in California could be limited or terminated.
The DMHC has instituted financial solvency regulations. The regulations are intended to provide a formal mechanism for monitoring the financial solvency of a RBO in California, including capitated physician groups. Under current DMHC regulations, our affiliated physician groups, as applicable, are required to, among other things:
• Maintain, at all times, a minimum “cash-to-claims ratio” (which means the organization’s cash, marketable securities, and certain qualified receivables, divided by the organization’s total unpaid claims liability) of 0.75; and
• Submit periodic reports to the DMHC containing various data and attestations regarding their performance and financial solvency, including IBNR calculations and documentation and attestations as to whether or not the organization (i) was in compliance with the “Knox-Keene Act” requirements related to claims payment timeliness, (ii) had maintained positive tangible net equity (“TNE”), and (iii) had maintained positive working capital.
In the event that a physician group is not in compliance with any of the above criteria, it would be required to describe in a report submitted to the DMHC the reasons for non-compliance and actions to be taken to bring it into compliance. Under such regulations, the DMHC can also make some of the Information contained in the reports, public, including, but not limited to, whether or not a particular physician organization met each of the criteria. In the event any of our affiliated physician groups are not able to meet certain of the financial solvency requirements, and fail to meet subsequent corrective action plans, it could be subject to sanctions, or limitations on, or removal of, its ability to do business in California. There can be no assurance that our affiliated physician group, such as our IPA, will remain in compliance with DMHC requirements or be able to timely and adequately rectify non-compliance. To the extent that we need to provide additional capital to our affiliated physician group in the future in order to comply with DMHC regulations, we would have less cash available for other parts of our operations.
Our revenue will be negatively impacted if our physicians fail to appropriately document their services.
We rely upon our affiliated physicians to appropriately and accurately complete necessary medical record documentation and assign appropriate reimbursement codes for their services. Reimbursement is conditioned upon, in part, our affiliated physicians providing the correct procedure and diagnosis codes and properly documenting the services themselves, including the level of service provided and the medical necessity for the services. If our affiliated physicians have provided incorrect or incomplete documentation or selected inaccurate reimbursement codes, this could result in non-payment for services rendered or lead to allegations of billing fraud. This could subsequently lead to civil and criminal penalties, including exclusion from government healthcare programs, such as Medicare and Medicaid. In addition, third-party payors may disallow, in whole or in part, requests for reimbursement based on determinations that certain amounts are not covered, services provided were not medically necessary, or supporting documentation was not adequate. Retroactive adjustments may change amounts realized from third-party payors and result in recoupments or refund demands, affecting revenue already received.
Table of Contents 23
Primary care physicians may seek to affiliate with our and our competitors’ IPAs at the same time.
It is common in the medical services industry for primary care physicians to be affiliated with multiple IPAs. Our affiliated IPA therefore may enter into agreements with physicians who are also affiliated with our competitors. However, some of our competitors at times have agreements with physicians that require the physician to provide exclusive services. Our affiliated IPA often has no knowledge, and no way of knowing, whether a physician is subject to an exclusivity agreement without being informed by the physician. Competitors could initiate lawsuits against us alleging in part interference with such exclusivity arrangements. An adverse outcome from any such lawsuit could adversely affect our business, cash flows and financial condition.
If we inadvertently employ or contract with an excluded person, we may face government sanctions.
Individuals and entities can be excluded from participating in the Medicare and Medicaid programs for violating certain laws and regulations, or for other reasons such as the loss of a license in any state, even if the person retains other licensure. This means that the excluded person and others are prohibited from receiving payments for such person’s services rendered to Medicare or Medicaid beneficiaries, and if the excluded person is a physician, all services ordered (not just provided) by such physician are also non-covered and non-payable. Entities that employ or contract with excluded individuals are prohibited from billing the Medicare or Medicaid programs for the excluded individual’s services and are subject to civil penalties if it does. The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office of the Inspector General maintains a list of excluded persons. Although we have instituted policies and procedures to minimize such risks, there can be no assurance that we will not inadvertently hire or contract with an excluded person, or that our employees or contracts will not become excluded in the future without our knowledge. If this occurs, we may be subject to substantial repayments and civil penalties which could adversely affect our business, cash flows, and financial condition.
We may be subject to liability for failure to fully comply with applicable corporate and securities laws.
We are subject to various corporate and securities laws. Any failure to comply with such laws could cause government agencies to take action against us, which could restrict our ability to issue securities and result in fines or penalties. Any claim brought by such an agency could also cause us to expend resources to defend ourselves, divert the attention of our management from our business and could significantly harm our business, operating results, and financial condition, even if the claim is resolved in our favor. We received six (6) shareholder demand letters from multiple plaintiffs’ securities law firms in connection with the Company’s proxy statement filed with the SEC on February 14, 2022. This demand letters requested certain additional disclosures in connection with the proposed Nutex Merger. We did not provide any further disclosures. As of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, no further action has been taken by these shareholders and no lawsuit has been filed against us by these firms.
We cannot preclude the possibility that claims or lawsuits brought relating to any alleged securities law violations or breaches of fiduciary duty in connection with the proposed Nutex Merger could potentially require significant time and resources to defend and/or settle and distract our management and board of directors from focusing on our business.
We may face lawsuits not covered by insurance and related expenses may be material. Our failure to avoid, defend, and accrue for claims and litigation could negatively impact our results of operations or cash flows.
We are exposed to and become involved in various litigation matters arising out of our business, including from time to time, actual or threatened lawsuits. Malpractice lawsuits are common in the healthcare industry. The medical malpractice legal environment varies greatly by state. The status of tort reform, availability of non-economic damages, or the presence or absence of other statutes, such as elder abuse or vulnerable adult statutes, influence the incidence and severity of malpractice litigation. We may also be subject to other types of lawsuits, such as those initiated by our competitors, stockholders, employees, service providers, contractors, or by government agencies, including when we terminate relationships with them, which may involve large claims and significant defense costs. Many states have joint and several liabilities for providers who deliver care to a patient and are at least partially liable. As a result, if one provider is found liable for medical malpractice for the provision of care to a particular patient, all other providers who furnished care to that same patient, including possibly us and our affiliated physicians, may also share in the liability, which could be substantial individually or in aggregate.
Table of Contents 24
The defense of litigation, including fees of legal counsel, expert witnesses, and related costs, is expensive and difficult to forecast accurately. Such costs may be unrecoverable even if we ultimately prevail in litigation and could consume a significant portion of our limited capital resources. To defend lawsuits, it may also be necessary for us to divert officers and other employees from our normal business functions to gather evidence, give testimony, and otherwise support litigation efforts. If we lose any material litigation, we could face material judgments or awards against them. An unfavorable resolution of one or more of the proceedings in which we are involved now or in the future could have a material adverse effect on our business, cash flows, and financial condition. We may also in the future find it necessary to file lawsuits to recover damages or protect our interests. The cost of such litigation could also be significant and unrecoverable, which may also deter us from aggressively pursuing even legitimate claims
Our affiliated physicians are required to carry first dollar coverage with limits of coverage equal to $1.0 million for all claims based on occurrence up to an aggregate of $3.0 million per year We cannot be certain that our insurance coverage will be adequate to cover liabilities arising out of claims asserted against us, our affiliated professional organizations, or our affiliated physicians. Liabilities incurred by us or our affiliates in excess of our insurance coverage, including coverage for professional liability and other claims, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations. Insurance coverage generally must be renewed annually and may not continue to be available to us in future years at acceptable costs and on favorable terms, which could increase our exposure to litigation.
Risks Related to Our Growth Strategy and Business Model
	Our growth strategy may not prove viable and we may not realize expected results.	In order to grow our business, we plan to drive greater awareness of our affiliated providers and their offerings and adoption of our platform from enterprises across new vertical markets. We intend to increase our investment in sales and marketing, as well as in technological development, to meet evolving customer needs in these and other markets. There is no guarantee, however, that we will be successful in gaining new customers from any or all of these markets. We have limited experience in marketing and selling our products and services generally, and in particular in these new markets, which may present unique and unexpected challenges and difficulties.
If the costs of the new marketing channels we use increase dramatically, then we may choose to use alternative and less expensive channels, which may not be as effective as the channels we currently use. As we add to or change the mix of our marketing strategies, we may need to expand into more expensive channels than those we are currently in, which could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition. In addition, we have limited experience marketing our products and platform and we may not be successful in selecting the marketing channels that will provide us with exposure to customers in a cost-effective manner. As part of our strategy to penetrate the new vertical markets, we will incur marketing expenses before we are able to recognize any revenue in such markets, and these expenses may not result in increased revenue or brand awareness. We have made in the past, and may make in the future, significant expenditures and investments in new marketing campaigns, and these investments may not lead to the cost-effective acquisition of additional customers. If we are unable to maintain effective marketing programs, then our ability to attract new customers or enter into new vertical markets could be adversely affected.
Table of Contents 25
We could experience significant losses under capitation contracts if our expenses exceed revenues.
Under a capitation contract, a health plan typically prospectively pays an IPA, periodic capitation payments based on a percentage of the amount received by the health plan. Capitation payments, in the aggregate, represent a prospective budget from which an IPA manages care-related expenses on behalf of the population enrolled with that IPA. If our affiliated IPA is able to manage care-related expenses under the capitated levels, we realize operating profits from capitation contracts. However, if care-related expenses exceed projected levels, our affiliated IPA may realize substantial operating deficits, which are not capped and could lead to substantial losses. Additionally, factors beyond our control, such as natural disasters, the potential effects of climate change, major epidemics, pandemics, or newly emergent viruses (such as COVID-19), could reduce our ability to effectively manage the costs of providing healthcare.
If our agreement with our affiliated physician group is deemed invalid or are terminated under applicable law, our results of operations and financial condition will be materially impaired.
There are various state laws, including laws in California, regulating the corporate practice of medicine, which prohibit us from directly owning medical professional entities. These prohibitions are intended to prevent unlicensed persons from interfering with or inappropriately influencing a physician’s professional judgment. These and other laws may also prevent fee-splitting, which is the sharing of professional service income with non-professional or business interests. The interpretation and enforcement of these laws vary significantly from state to state. We currently derive revenues from an MSA arrangement with our affiliated IPA, whereby we provide management and administrative services to them. If this agreement and arrangement is held to be invalid under laws prohibiting the corporate practice of medicine and other laws or if there are new laws that prohibit such agreements or arrangements, a significant portion of our revenues will be lost, resulting in a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.
The arrangements we have with our VIEs are not as secure as direct ownership of such entities.
Because of corporate practice of medicine laws, we entered into contractual arrangements to manage certain affiliated physician practice groups, which allow us to consolidate those groups for financial reporting purposes. We do not have direct ownership interests in any of our VIEs and are not able to exercise rights as an equity holder to directly change the members of the boards of directors of these entities so as to affect changes at the management and operational level. Under our arrangements with our VIEs, we must rely on their equity holders to exercise our control over the entities. If our affiliated entities or their equity holders fail to perform as expected, we may have to incur substantial costs and expend additional resources to enforce such arrangements.
Any failure by our affiliated entities or their owners to perform their obligations under their agreements with us would have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Our affiliated physician practice group is owned by individual physicians who could die, become incapacitated, or become no longer affiliated with us. Although our MSA with this affiliate provides that they will be binding on successors of current owners, as the successors are not parties to the MSA, it is uncertain in case of the death, bankruptcy, or divorce of a current owner whether their successors would be subject to such MSA.
Our revenues and operations are dependent on a limited number of key payors.
Our operations are dependent on a concentrated number of payors. Two payors accounted for an aggregate of 23% our total net revenue for the year ended December 31, 2021, and two customers accounted for an aggregate 24% of our total net revenue for the year ended December 31, 2020, respectively. We believe that a majority of our revenues will continue to be derived from a limited number of key payors, which may terminate their contracts with us, or our physicians credentialed by them upon the occurrence of certain events. They may also amend the material terms of the contracts under certain circumstances. Failure to maintain such contracts on favorable terms, or at all, would materially and adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.
Table of Contents 26
An exodus of our patients could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations. We may also be impacted by a shift in payor mix, including eligibility changes to government and private insurance programs.
A material decline, in the number of patients that we and our affiliated physician groups serve, whether a government or a private entity is paying for their healthcare, could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition, which could result from increased competition, new developments in the healthcare industry, or regulatory overhauls. In light of the repeal of the individual mandate requirement under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 (also known as Affordable Care Act or Obamacare) via the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, some people are expected to lose their health insurance and thus may not continue to afford services by our managed medical groups. In addition, due to potential decreased availability of healthcare through private employers, the number of patients who are uninsured or participate in governmental programs may increase. A shift in payor mix, from managed care and other private payors to government payors or the uninsured may result in a reduction in our rates of reimbursement or an increase in our uncollectible receivables or uncompensated care, with a corresponding decrease our net revenue. Changes in the eligibility requirements for governmental programs could also change the number of patients who participate in such programs or the number of uninsured patients. For those patients who remain with private insurance, changes in those programs could increase patient responsibility amounts, resulting in a greater risk for uncollectible receivables. Such events could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
We are dependent in part on referrals from third parties and preferred provider status with payors.
Our business relies in part on referrals from third parties for our services. We receive referrals from community medical providers, emergency departments, payors, and hospitals in the same manner as other medical professionals receive patient referrals. We do not provide compensation or other remuneration to referral sources for referring patients to us. A decrease in these referrals due to competition, concerns about our services and other factors could result in a significant decrease in our revenues and adversely impact our financial condition. Similarly, we cannot assure that we will be able to obtain or maintain preferred provider status with significant third-party payors in the communities where we operate. If we are unable to maintain our referral base or our preferred provider status with significant third-party payors, it may negatively impact our revenues and financial performance
Our business model depends on numerous complex management information systems, and any failure to successfully maintain these systems or implement new systems could undermine our ability to receive payments and otherwise materially harm our operations and may result in violations of healthcare laws and regulations.
We depend on a complex, specialized, integrated management information system and standardized procedures for operational and financial information, as well as for our billing operations. We may be unable to enhance existing management information systems or implement new management information systems when necessary. We may experience unanticipated delays, complications, or expenses in implementing, integrating, and operating our systems. Our management information systems may require modifications, improvements, or replacements that may require both substantial expenditures, as well as interruptions in operations. Our ability to create and implement these systems depends on the availability of technology and skilled personnel. Our failure to successfully implement and maintain all of our systems could undermine our ability to receive payments and otherwise have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, and financial condition. Our failure to successfully operate our billing systems could also lead to potential violations of healthcare laws and regulations.
Table of Contents 27
Consolidation in the health care industry could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Many health care industry participants and payers are consolidating to create larger and more integrated health care delivery systems with greater market power. We expect regulatory and economic conditions to result in additional consolidation in the health care industry in the future. As consolidation accelerates, the economies of scale of our customers’ organizations may grow. If a customer experiences sizable growth following consolidation, it may determine that it no longer needs to rely on us and may reduce its demand for our products and services. In addition, as health care providers consolidate to create larger and more integrated health care delivery systems with greater market power, these providers may try to use their market power to negotiate fee reductions for our products and services. Finally, consolidation may also result in the acquisition or future development by our customers of products and services that compete with our products and services. Any of these potential results of consolidation could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our use of “open source” software could adversely affect our ability to offer our services and subject us to possible litigation.
We use open source software in connection with our products and services. Companies that incorporate open source software into their products have, from time to time, faced claims challenging the use of open source software and/or compliance with open source license terms. As a result, we could be subject to suits by parties claiming ownership of what we believe to be open source software or claiming noncompliance with open source licensing terms. Some open source software licenses require users who distribute software containing open source software to publicly disclose all or part of the source code to such software and/or make available any derivative works of the open source code, which could include valuable proprietary code of the user, on unfavorable terms or at no cost. While we monitor the use of open source software and try to ensure that none is used in a manner that would require us to disclose our proprietary source code or that would otherwise breach the terms of an open source agreement, such use could inadvertently occur, in part because open source license terms are often ambiguous. Any requirement to disclose our proprietary source code or pay damages for breach of contract could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations and could help our competitors develop products and services that are similar to or better than ours.
The security of our platform, networks or computer systems may be breached, and any unauthorized access to our customer data will have an adverse effect on our business and reputation.
The use of our platform will involve the storage, transmission and processing of our clients’ private data, and this data may contain confidential and proprietary information of our clients or other personal or identifying information regarding our clients, their employees or other persons. Individuals or entities may attempt to penetrate our network or platform security, or that of our third-party hosting and storage providers, and could gain access to our clients’ private data, which could result in the destruction, disclosure or misappropriation of proprietary or confidential information of our clients’ or their customers, employees and business partners. If any of our clients’ private data is leaked, obtained by others or destroyed without authorization, it could harm our reputation, we could be exposed to civil and criminal liability, and we may lose our ability to access private data, which will adversely affect the quality and performance of our platform.
In addition, our platform may be subject to computer malware, viruses and computer hacking, fraudulent use attempts and phishing attacks, all of which have become more prevalent in our industry. Though it is difficult to determine what, if any, harm may directly result from any specific interruption or attack, they may include the theft or destruction of data owned by us or our customers, and/or damage to our platform. Any failure to maintain the performance, reliability, security and availability of our products or services and technical infrastructure to the satisfaction of our customers may harm our reputation and our ability to retain existing customers and attract new users.
Table of Contents 28
While we will implement procedures and safeguards that are designed to prevent security breaches and cyber-attacks, they may not be able to protect against all attempts to breach our systems, and we may not become aware in a timely manner of any such security breach. Unauthorized access to or security breaches of our platform, network or computer systems, or those of our technology service providers, could result in the loss of business, reputational damage, regulatory investigations and orders, litigation, indemnity obligations, damages for contract breach, civil and criminal penalties for violation of applicable laws, regulations or contractual obligations, and significant costs, fees and other monetary payments for remediation. If customers believe that our platform does not provide adequate security for the storage of sensitive information or its transmission over the Internet, our business will be harmed. Customers’ concerns about security or privacy may deter them from using our platform for activities that involve personal or other sensitive information.
We could incur substantial costs in protecting or defending our intellectual property rights, and any failure to protect our intellectual property could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Our success depends, in part, on our ability to protect our brand and the proprietary methods and technologies that we develop under patent and other intellectual property laws of the United States and foreign jurisdictions so that we can prevent others from using our inventions and proprietary information. Clinigence Health Inc. owns U.S. Patent Application No. 15/882,688, which is a utility patent application currently pending before the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Any patents that have been applied for or that may be issued in the future may not provide significant protection for our intellectual property. If we fail to protect our intellectual property rights adequately, our competitors might gain access to our technology and our business, results of operations and financial condition may be adversely affected.
The particular forms of intellectual property protection that we seek, or our business decisions about when to file patent applications and trademark applications, may not be adequate to protect our business. We could be required to spend significant resources to monitor and protect our intellectual property rights. Litigation may be necessary in the future to enforce our intellectual property rights, determine the validity and scope of our proprietary rights or those of others, or defend against claims of infringement or invalidity. Such litigation could be costly, time-consuming and distracting to management, result in a diversion of significant resources, lead to the narrowing or invalidation of portions of our intellectual property and have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. Our efforts to enforce our intellectual property rights may be met with defenses, counterclaims and countersuits attacking the validity and enforceability of our intellectual property rights or alleging that we infringe the counterclaimant’s own intellectual property. Any of our patents, patent applications, copyrights, trademarks or other intellectual property rights could be challenged by others or invalidated through administrative process or litigation.
We expect to also rely, in part, on confidentiality agreements with our business partners, employees, consultants, advisors, customers and others in our efforts to protect our proprietary technology, processes and methods. These agreements may not effectively prevent disclosure of our confidential information, and it may be possible for unauthorized parties to copy our software or other proprietary technology or information, or to develop similar software independently without our having an adequate remedy for unauthorized use or disclosure of our confidential information. In addition, others may independently discover our trade secrets and proprietary information, and in these cases we would not be able to assert any trade secret rights against those parties. Costly and time-consuming litigation could be necessary to enforce and determine the scope of our proprietary rights, and the failure to obtain or maintain trade secret protection could adversely affect our competitive business position.
In addition, the laws of some countries do not protect intellectual property and other proprietary rights to the same extent as the laws of the United States. To the extent we expand our international activities, our exposure to unauthorized copying, transfer and use of our proprietary technology or information may increase.
Table of Contents 29
Our means of protecting our intellectual property and proprietary rights may not be adequate or our competitors could independently develop similar technology. If we fail to meaningfully protect our intellectual property and proprietary rights, our business, results of operations and financial condition could be adversely affected.
Assertions by third parties of infringement or other violations by us of their intellectual property rights could result in significant costs and harm our business and operating results.
Our success depends upon our ability to refrain from infringing upon the intellectual property rights of others. Some companies, including some of our competitors, own large numbers of patents, copyrights and trademarks, which they may use to assert claims against us. As we grow and enter new markets, we will face a growing number of competitors. As the number of competitors in our industry grows and the functionality of products in different industry segments overlaps, we expect that software and other solutions in our industry may be subject to such claims by third parties. Third parties may in the future assert claims of infringement, misappropriation or other violations of intellectual property rights against us. We cannot assure you that infringement claims will not be asserted against us in the future, or that, if asserted, any infringement claim will be successfully defended. A successful claim against us could require that we pay substantial damages or ongoing royalty payments, prevent us from offering our services, or require that we comply with other unfavorable terms. We may also be obligated to indemnify our customers or business partners or pay substantial settlement costs, including royalty payments, in connection with any such claim or litigation and to obtain licenses, modify applications or refund fees, which could be costly. Even if we were to prevail in such a dispute, any litigation regarding our intellectual property could be costly and time-consuming and divert the attention of our management and key personnel from our business operations.
The information that we expect to provide to our clients could be inaccurate or incomplete, which could harm our business reputation, financial condition, and results of operations.
We expect to aggregate, process, and analyze healthcare-related data and information for use by our clients. Because data in the healthcare industry is fragmented in origin, inconsistent in format, and often incomplete, the overall quality of data received or accessed in the healthcare industry is often poor, the degree or amount of data which is knowingly or unknowingly absent or omitted can be material, and we frequently discover data issues and errors during our data integrity checks. If the analytical data that we expect to provide to our clients are based on incorrect or incomplete data or if we make mistakes in the capture, input, or analysis of these data, our reputation may suffer and our ability to attract and retain clients may be materially harmed.
In addition, we expect to assist our clients with the management and submission of data to governmental entities, including CMS. These processes and submissions are governed by complex data processing and validation policies and regulations. If we fail to abide by such policies or submit incorrect or incomplete data, we may be exposed to liability to a client, court, or government agency that concludes that our storage, handling, submission, delivery, or display of health information or other data was wrongful or erroneous.
Our proprietary applications may not operate properly, which could damage our reputation, give rise to a variety of claims against us, or divert our resources from other purposes, any of which could harm our business and operating results.
Proprietary software and application development is time-consuming, expensive, and complex, and may involve unforeseen difficulties. We may encounter technical obstacles, and it is possible that we discover additional problems that prevent our proprietary applications from operating properly. If our applications and services do not function reliably or fail to achieve client expectations in terms of performance, clients could assert liability claims against us and attempt to cancel their contracts with us. Moreover, material performance problems, defects, or errors in our existing or new applications and services may arise in the future and may result from, among other things, the lack of interoperability of our applications with systems and data that we did not develop and the function of which is outside of our control or undetected in our testing. Defects or errors in our applications might discourage existing or potential clients from purchasing services from us. Correction of defects or errors could prove to be time consuming, costly, impossible, or impracticable. The existence of errors or defects in our applications and the correction of such errors could divert our resources from other matters relating to our business, damage our reputation, increase our costs, and have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Table of Contents 30
If we are unable to hire, retain and motivate qualified personnel, our business will suffer.
Our future success depends, in part, on our ability to continue to attract and retain highly skilled personnel. We believe that there is, and will continue to be, intense competition for highly skilled management, engineering, data science, sales and other personnel with experience in our industry. We must provide competitive compensation packages and a high-quality work environment to hire, retain and motivate employees. If we are unable to retain and motivate our existing employees and attract qualified personnel to fill key positions, we may be unable to manage our business effectively, including the development, marketing and sale of our products, which could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition. To the extent we hire personnel from competitors, we also may be subject to allegations that they have been improperly solicited or that they have divulged proprietary or other confidential information. If we are unable to retain our employees, our business, results of operations and financial condition could be adversely affected.
Our Board of Directors may change our strategies, policies, and procedures without stockholder approval, and we may become more highly leveraged, which may increase our risk of default under our debt obligations.
Our investment, financing, leverage, and dividend policies, and our policies with respect to all other activities, including growth, capitalization, and operations, are determined exclusively by our board of directors, and may be amended or revised at any time by our board of directors without notice to or a vote of our stockholders. This could result in us conducting operational matters, making investments, or pursuing different business or growth strategies than those contemplated in this private placement memorandum. Further, our charter and bylaws do not limit the amount or percentage of indebtedness, funded or otherwise, that we may incur. Higher leverage also increases the risk of default on our obligations. In addition, a change in our investment policies, including the manner in which we allocate our resources across our portfolio or the types of assets in which we seek to invest, may increase our exposure to interest rate risk and liquidity risk. Changes to our policies with regards to the foregoing could materially adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations, and cash flow.
Our solutions face intense competition in the marketplace. If we are unable to compete effectively, our operating results could be adversely affected.
The market for our solutions is increasingly competitive, rapidly evolving and fragmented, and is subject to changing technology and shifting customer needs. Although we believe that our platform and the solutions that it offers are unique, many vendors develop and market products and services that compete to varying extents with our offerings, and we expect competition in our market to continue to intensify. Moreover, industry consolidation may increase competition.
If we do not keep pace with technological changes, our solutions may become less competitive and our business may suffer.
Our market is expected to be characterized by rapid technological change, frequent product and service innovation and evolving industry standards. If we are unable to provide enhancements and new features for our existing solutions or new solutions that achieve market acceptance or that keep pace with these technological developments, our business could be adversely affected. The success of enhancements, new features and solutions depends on several factors, including the timely completion, introduction and market acceptance of the enhancements or new features or solutions. Failure in this regard may significantly impair our revenue growth. In addition, because our solutions are designed to operate on a variety of systems, we will need to continuously modify and enhance our solutions to keep pace with changes in internet-related hardware, software, communication, browser and database technologies. We may not be successful in either developing these modifications and enhancements or in bringing them to market in a timely fashion. Furthermore, uncertainties about the timing and nature of new network platforms or technologies, or modifications to existing platforms or technologies, could increase our research and development expenses. Any failure of our solutions to keep pace with technological changes or operate effectively with future network platforms and technologies could reduce the demand for our solutions, result in customer dissatisfaction and adversely affect our business.
The Company’s success depends upon its ability to adapt to a changing market and its continued development of additional services.
Although the Company believes that it will provide a competitive range of products and services, there can be no assurance of acceptance by the marketplace. The procurement of new contracts by the Company may be dependent upon the continuing results achieved with current clients, upon pricing and operational considerations, as well as the potential need for continuing improvement to existing services. Moreover, the markets for such services may not develop as expected nor can there be any assurance that the Company will be successful in its marketing of any such services.
Table of Contents 31

---

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
None.

---

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
Our Clinigence and AHA operations office is located at 2455 East Sunrise Blvd. Suite 1204 Fort Lauderdale FL, 33304, AHP’s operations are located at 7422 Garvey Ave. Ste 101 Rosemead, CA 91755, and Procare operations are located at 12828 Harbor Blvd. Garden Grove, CA 92840 which we believe is sufficient to accommodate anticipated future growth. We do not own any real property and operate pursuant to leases on the properties described above. These leases require monthly rental payments ranging from approximately $2,500 to $4,000 and have terms that expire between 2021 and 2024. We believe our existing leased facilities are in good condition and suitable for the conduct of our business.

---

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
From time-to-time, the Company is involved in various civil actions as part of its normal course of business. The Company is not a party to any litigation that is material to ongoing operations as defined in Item 103 of Regulation S-K as of the period ended December 31, 2021.

---

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURE
ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
Reserved.
Table of Contents 32
PART II

---

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS, AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
Market Information
The information presented below is our historical data and not necessarily indicative of our future financial condition or results of operations.
Clinigence’s common stock is listed on the OTCMarketsPink. under the symbol “CLNH.”
Record Holders
As of March 31, 2021, there are approximately 942 shareholders of record of our common stock based upon our transfer agent’s report. Because many of our shares of common stock are held by brokers and other nominees on behalf of stockholders, including in trust, we are unable to estimate the total number of stockholders represented by these record holders.
Dividends
To date we have not paid any cash dividends on our common stock, and we do not contemplate the payment of cash dividends thereon in the foreseeable future. Our future dividend policy will depend on our earnings, capital requirements, financial condition, and other factors relevant to our ability to pay dividends.
Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities
We sold 7,526,786 common shares valued at $1.75 per share to various investors for proceeds totaling $14,421,875 during the year ended December 31, 2021. The Company received $100,000 of the proceeds in the first quarter of 2022 for which a receivable was recorded at December 31, 2021.
We sold 1,250 common shares valued at $1.25 per share to a director for proceeds of $1,562 on September 28, 2021. We sold 1,000,000 common shares valued at $3.00 per share to a strategic investor for proceeds of $3,000,00 on September 30, 2021.
In connection with our convertible notes payable, various noteholders converted $2,395,000 of principal balance to 1,365,501 shares of common stock during the year ended December 31, 2021. The stock issued was determined based on the terms of the convertible notes.
During the year ended December 31, 2021, various shareholders exercised warrants in exchange for 106,578 common shares for proceeds of $153,424.
On December 14, 2021, a shareholder exercised options in exchange for 89,421 common shares valued at $2.00 per share for proceeds of $178,842.
In connection with the acquisition of Procare we issued 607,229 common shares valued at $4.00 per share and 151,807 common shares valued at $446,018 to the shareholders of Procare on October 1, 2021.
In connection with the acquisition of AHA we issued 14,218,248 common shares valued at $2.06 per share to the shareholders of AHA on February 25, 2021.In connection with the acquisition of AHP we issued 19,000,000 common shares valued at $2.06 per share to the shareholders of AHP on February 25, 2021. In connection with the AHA and AHP acquisitions, we issued 750,000 common shares valued at $2.06 per share for consulting services on February 25, 2021.
On January 28, 2021, we issued 182,567 common shares to officers and employees for deferred salaries and bonuses and reimbursed expenses, including 153,606 common shares issued to directors and officers, valued at $.65 per share. On January 28, 2021, we issued 46,154 common shares valued at $.65 per share to a former officer for payment of a note balance of $30,000.
Table of Contents 33
No underwriters were involved in the transactions described above. All of the securities issued in the foregoing transactions were issued by the Company in reliance upon the exemption from registration available under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act, including Regulation D and Regulation S promulgated thereunder, in that the transactions involved the issuance and sale of the Company’s securities to financially sophisticated individuals or entities that were aware of the Company’s activities and business and financial condition and took the securities for investment purposes and understood the ramifications of their actions, or were non-U.S. persons. The Company did not engage in any form of general solicitation or general advertising in connection with the transactions. The individuals represented that they were each and “accredited investor” as defined in Regulation D or non-U.S. person as defined in Regulation S at the time of issuance of the securities, and that it was acquiring such securities for its own account and not for distribution. All certificates representing the securities issued have a legend imprinted on them stating that the shares have not been registered under the Securities Act and cannot be transferred until properly registered under the Securities Act or an exemption applies.
Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers
None.

---

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
Reserved.

---

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following management’s discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto included in Part II, Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
In this section, “we,” “our,” “ours” and “us” refer to Clinigence Holdings Inc.(“Clinigence”) and its consolidated subsidiaries and affiliated entities, as appropriate, including its consolidated variable interest entities (“VIEs”).
Overview
The Company, together with our recent acquisitions of AHP Health Management Services, Inc. (“AHP”), Accountable Healthcare America, Inc. (“AHA”) and Procare Health Inc. (‘Procare”) is a technology-enabled, risk-bearing population health management company that manages provider networks.
Headquartered in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, our subsidiaries include management services organizations (“MSOs”), affiliated independent practice associations (“IPAs”), and a healthcare information technology company providing a cloud-based platform that enables healthcare organizations to provide value-based care and population health management (PHM).
Highlights
Merger with AHP Health Management Services Inc.
On February 25, 2021, we entered into an agreement and plan of merger (the “AHP Merger Agreement”) with AHP Health Management Services, Inc., a California corporation (“AHP”), AHP Acquisition Corp., a Delaware corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of Clinigence Holdings, Inc. (“Merger Sub”), and Robert Chan (the “Shareholders’ Representative”). The transactions contemplated by the AHP Merger Agreement were consummated on February 26, 2021 (the “AHP Closing”).
Table of Contents 34
The AHP Merger Agreement provided for the merger of Merger Sub with and into AHP, hereafter referred to as the “AHP Acquisition.” As a result of the Acquisition, Merger Sub ceased to exist, and AHP became the surviving corporation and a direct wholly owned subsidiary of Clinigence, and the former stockholders of AHP (the “AHP Stockholders”) have a direct equity ownership in Clinigence. Merger Sub was renamed AHP Health Management Services, Inc. Merger Sub was originally incorporated in Delaware, on January 26, 2021, and had no operating activity prior to the reported transaction.
AHP is a privately held company with controlling interest in its’ affiliate Associated Hispanic Physicians of Southern California IPA, a California Medical corporation, (“AHISP). A key term of the AHP Merger Agreement is that at Closing, AHP Management Inc entered into a Management Services Agreement with AHISP (the “Management Services Agreement”) making AHISP a Variable Interest Entity (VIE) of AHP.
California is a corporate practice of medicine state, and we operate by maintaining a long-term MSA with ASHISP. Under the MSA, our wholly owned AHP subsidiary is contracted to provide non-medical management and administrative services such as financial and risk management as well as information systems, marketing and administrative support to the AHISP. The MSA has an initial term of 20 years and is generally not terminable by AHISP except in the case of bankruptcy, gross negligence, fraud, or other illegal acts by AHP.
Through the MSA, we have exclusive authority over all non-medical decisions related to the ongoing business operations of AHISP. Consequently, the Company consolidates the revenue and expenses of AHISP as their primary beneficiary from the date of execution of the MSA.
The AHP Merger Agreement and Management Services Agreement was disclosed on the Company’s current report on Form 8-K filed on March 2, 2021.
Merger with Accountable Healthcare America, Inc.
On February 25, 2021, we entered into an agreement and plan of merger with Accountable Healthcare America, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“AHA”), and AHA Acquisition Corp., a Delaware corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of Parent (“Merger Sub entered into an agreement and plan of merger (the “AHA Merger Agreement”). The transactions contemplated by the AHA Merger Agreement were consummated on February 26, 2021 (the “AHA Closing”).
The AHA Merger Agreement provided for the merger of Merger Sub with and into AHA, hereafter referred to as the “AHA Acquisition.” As a result of the Acquisition, Merger Sub ceased to exist, and AHA became the surviving corporation and a direct wholly owned subsidiary of Clinigence, and the former stockholders of AHA (the “AHA Stockholders”) have a direct equity ownership in Clinigence. Merger Sub was renamed Accountable Healthcare America, Inc. Merger Sub was originally incorporated in Delaware, on January 2, 2020, and had no operating activity prior to the reported transaction.
The AHA Merger Agreement was disclosed on the Company’s current report on Form 8-K filed on March 2, 2021.
At the AHP Closing and the AHA Closing, hereafter collectively referred to as the “Closing”, all of the outstanding shares of AHP common stock (the “AHP Shares”) were converted solely into the right to receive a number of shares of Clinigence common stock (the “Company Shares”) such that the holders of outstanding equity of AHP immediately prior to the Closing own 45%, on a fully-diluted basis, of the outstanding equity of Clinigence immediately following the Closing, and all of the outstanding shares of AHA common stock (the “AHA Shares”) were converted solely into the right to receive a number of the Company Shares such that the holders of outstanding equity of AHA immediately prior to the Closing own 35%, on a fully-diluted basis, of the outstanding equity of Clinigence immediately following the Closing, and holders of outstanding equity of Clinigence immediately prior to the Closing own 20%, on a fully-diluted basis, of the outstanding equity of Clinigence. Additionally, the Company’s AHA Series E Preferred Stock investment was surrendered as part of the Acquisition of 100% of AHA.
Table of Contents 35
The preliminary accounting for our merger with AHP and AHA was disclosed on the Company’s current report on Form 8-K/A filed on May 21, 2021.
Acquisition of Procare Health Inc.
On October 15, 2021, we entered into an agreement and plan of merger (the “Procare Merger Agreement”) with Clinigence Procare Health Inc, a Delaware corporation (“Merger Sub”), Procare Health, Inc., a California corporation (“Procare”), Anh Nguyen (“Majority Stockholder”), and Tram Nguyen (“Minority Stockholder” and together with Majority Stockholder, the “Stockholders”).
The Procare Merger Agreement provided for the merger of Merger Sub with and into Procare, hereafter referred to as the “Acquisition.” As a result of the Acquisition, Merger Sub ceased to exist, and Procare became the surviving corporation and a direct wholly owned subsidiary of Clinigence, and the former stockholders of Procare, the Stockholders, have a direct equity ownership in Clinigence.
Under the terms of the stock purchase agreement, the shares of Procare’s common stock issued and outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time (other than Cancelled Shares) will be converted into the right to receive by the Stockholders an aggregate of 759,036 (the “Exchange Ratio”) shares of Parent’s common stock (“Stock Consideration”). Twenty Five percent of the Stock Consideration shall be held back and shall be released to Parent or Stockholders, as the case may be, in accordance with the procedures set forth in Section 3.2 the Merger Agreement. In the event that EBITDA is equal to or exceeds $316,265 (the “Minimum EBITDA Amount”) for the Fiscal Year ended December 31, 2021, Stockholders shall be entitled to receive fifty percent (50%) of the Holdback Shares. If the EBITDA for such period is less than $316,265, that portion of the Holdback Shares shall be released to the Parent. In addition, if the EBITDA for the Procare for the period ended December 31, 2022, equals or exceeds the Minimum EBITDA Amount, the remaining fifty percent (50%) of the Holdback Shares shall be released to the Stockholders. In the event that the Minimum EBITDA Amount is not achieved for such period, that portion of the Holdback Shares shall be returned to the Parent.
The Procare Merger Agreement was disclosed on the Company’s current report on Form 8-K filed on October 22, 2021, and the preliminary accounting for our merger with Procare was disclosed on the Company’s current report on Form 8-K/A filed on December 15, 2021.
Recent Developments
Reverse Merger with Nutex
On November 23, 2021, we entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Nutex Merger Agreement”) among the Company, Nutex Acquisition LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company (“Merger Subsidiary”), Nutex Health Holdco LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Nutex”), Micro Hospital Holding LLC, a Texas limited liability company (“MHH”) (solely for the purposes of certain Sections), Nutex Health LLC (solely for the purposes of certain Sections) and Thomas Vo, M.D., not individually but in his capacity as the representative of the equityholders of Nutex (the “Nutex Representative”).
Under the terms of the Nutex Merger Agreement, Merger Subsidiary will merge with and into Nutex, with Nutex becoming a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company (the “Nutex Merger”).
In connection with the Nutex Merger Agreement, Nutex has entered into certain Contribution Agreements with holders of equity interests (“Nutex Owners”) of subsidiaries and affiliates of Nutex and MHH (the “Nutex Subsidiaries”) pursuant to which such Nutex Owners have agreed to contribute certain equity interests in the Nutex Subsidiaries to Nutex in exchange for specified equity interests in Nutex (collectively, the “Contribution Transaction”).
Table of Contents 36
Pursuant to the Nutex Merger Agreement, each unit representing an equity interest in Nutex issued and outstanding immediately prior to the effective time of the Merger but after the Contribution Transaction (collectively, the “Nutex Membership Interests”) shall be converted into the right to receive 3.571428575 (the “Exchange Ratio”) shares of common stock (“Company Common Stock”) of the Company, par value $0.001 per share. The Exchange Ratio may be adjusted proportionally upward based on potential pre-Closing redemptions of Nutex Membership Interests taking into account any new debt incurred by Nutex to finance such redemptions.
The aggregate number of Nutex Membership Interests outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time of the Merger will be equal to the aggregate EBITDA of Nutex and the contributing percentages of the Nutex Subsidiaries for the trailing 12-month period ended September 30, 2021 (“TTM EBITDA”). The aggregate number of shares of Company Common Stock to be issued in the Merger will be equal to (a) ten times TTM EBITDA (minus the aggregate debt of the Nutex Subsidiaries and Nutex facilities outstanding as of Closing, including any new debt incurred to finance the redemptions of Nutex Membership Interests divided by (b) $2.80 (the “Merger Consideration”).
The aggregate number of Nutex Membership Interests outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time of the Merger will be equal to (a) with respect to ramping and mature hospitals the aggregate EBITDA of Nutex based on the contributed percentages of such hospitals for the trailing 12-month period ended September 30, 2021 (“TTM EBITDA”) and (b) with respect to under construction hospitals, the aggregate capital contribution amounts received from the contributing owners of the under construction hospitals	The aggregate number of shares of Company Common Stock to be issued in the Merger will be equal to (x) with respect to the ramping and mature hospitals, (i) ten times TTM EBITDA (minus (A) the aggregate debt of the Nutex Subsidiaries and Nutex facilities outstanding as of Closing, ‎excluding guarantees of mortgage debt of the noncontrolled real estate entities and finance lease obligations ‎reported as indebtedness under GAAP but including any new debt incurred to finance any redemptions of Nutex Membership Interests, plus (B) up to $10,000,000 of cash held by the Nutex Subsidiaries at Closing ) divided by (ii) $2.80 plus (y) with respect to the Under Construction Hospitals, (a) the aggregate capital contribution amounts received from the contributing owners of the Under Construction Hospitals divided by (b) $2.80 (collectively the “Merger Consideration”). The Merger Consideration shall be increased by such number of shares of Company Common Stock as is equal to the number of shares of Company Common Stock as may be issued by Clinigence to a certain consultant as required under the Merger Agreement. In addition, under the terms of the Contribution Agreements owners of the under construction hospitals and ramping hospitals may be entitled to additional shares of Company Common Stock in the future.
The transaction was approved by the Board of Directors of the Company. Consummation of the Merger is subject to various closing conditions, including, among other things, listing of the Company Common Stock on the Nasdaq Capital Market.
Key Financial Measures and Indicators
Operating Revenues
Our revenue primarily consists of capitation revenue and SaaS subscription services. The form of billing and related risk of collection for such services may vary by type of revenue and the customer.
Operating Expenses
Our largest expense is the patient care cost paid to contracted physicians, and the cost of providing management and administrative support services to our affiliated physician groups. These services include providing utilization and case management, physician practice billing, revenue cycle services, physician practice management, administrative oversight, coding services, and other consulting services.
Results of operation
Our consolidated operating results for the year ended December 31, 2021, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2020 were as follows:
CLINIGENCE HOLDINGS, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
Sales
Capitation revenue, net 16,620,488 -
SaaS revenue 1,653,806 1,585,952
Management services revenue, net 519,489 -
Total sales 18,793,783 1,585,952
Cost of sales 14,647,045 909,780
Gross profit 4,146,738 676,172
Operating expenses
Research and development 285,880 557,257
Sales and marketing 24,449 166,759
General and administrative expenses 12,177,316 3,251,353
Goodwill impairment loss - 3,471,508
Gain on sale of assets - (8,395,702 )
Gain on lease termination - (25,174 )
Loss on sale of fixed assets - 54,819
Amortization 677,168 222,032
Total operating expenses 13,164,813 (697,148 )
Income (loss) from operations (9,018,075 ) 1,373,320
Other income (expense)
Loss on extinguishment of debt
(167,797 )
Settlement payment from ACMG 522,000
Income from forgiveness of debt 636,807 -
Impairment of Series E investment - (6,402,278 )
Interest income 1,030
Interest expense - debt obligations (784,012 )
Interest expense - accretion of debt discount (6,011,071 ) (335,450 )
Total other income (expenses) (5,635,359 ) (6,904,495 )
Loss from continuing operations (14,653,434 ) (5,531,175 )
Income tax benefit - deferred 984,810 -
Loss from discontinued operations (including gain on disposal of $142,027 for the year ended December 31, 2020) - (118,992 )
Net loss (13,688,624 ) (5,650,167 )
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests -
Net income (loss) attributable to Clinigence Holdings, Inc. $ (13,669,515 ) $ (5,650,167 )
Table of Contents 37
Revenue
The increase was primarily attributable to the AHP acquisition.
Our total revenue in 2021 was $18.8 million, as compared to $1.5 million in 2020. The increase was primarily attributable to the following:
(i) an increase of $16.6 million in capitation revenue due to the acquisition of AHP Health Management Services, Inc. which was acquired as of February 21, 2021.
(ii) a decrease of $67,854 in SaaS revenue due to a decrease in the number customers subscribing to the technology platform.
(iii) an increase of $519,489 in management services fees due to the acquisitions of AHP health Management Services, Inc. which was acquired as of February 21, 2021 and Procare Health Inc which was acquired as of October 1, 2021.
Cost of Services
Expenses related to cost of services for the year ended December 31, 2021, were $14.6 million, as compared to $909,780 for the same year ended December 31, 2020. The overall increase was primarily due to the AHP acquisition.
Research and Development
Research and Development expense for year ended December 31, 2021, was $285,880 compared to $557,257 for year ended December 31, 2020. The decrease was primarily attributable to the reduction of research and development personnel for our Clinigence Health subsidiary.
Sales and Marketing
Sales and Marketing expense for the year ended December 31, 2021, was $24,449, compared to $166,759 for the year ended December 31, 2020. The decrease was primarily attributable to the reduction of sales and marketing personnel for our Clinigence Health subsidiary.
General and Administrative Expenses
General and administrative expenses for year ended December 31, 2021, were $12.1 million, as compared to $3.25 million for year ended December 31, 2020. The increase was primarily attributable to the AHP, AHA, Procare acquisitions and pending Nutex merger transactional costs as well as to stock-based compensation expenses.
Gain on Sale of Assets
For the year ended December 31, 2020, the Company recorded a gain on the sale of intellectual property of $8,395,702 pursuant to the AHP IP purchase agreement in 2020 with our subsidiary Clinigence Health Inc.
Gain on Lease Termination
For the year ended December 31, 2020, the Company recorded a gain on the termination of the operating lease of $25,174 for the termination of the Atlanta, Georgia office lease for our Clinigence Health subsidiary.
Loss on Sale of Fixed Assets
For the year ended December 31, 2020, the Company recorded a loss on the sale of fixed assets of $54,819 resulting from the termination of the Atlanta, Georgia office lease for our Clinigence Health subsidiary.
Table of Contents 38
Amortization
Amortization expense for the year ended December 31, 2021, was $677,168 as compared to $222,032 for the year ended December 31, 2020. This amount includes the amortization of intangible assets acquired from AHP and AHA.
Loss on extinguishment of debt
For the year ended December 31, 2020, we reported, a non-recurring loss on extinguishment of debt for related party convertible debt conversions of $167,797, which represents the write off of debt discount of the debt assumed by AHA in the IP purchase agreement.
Income from forgiveness of debt
For the year ended December 31, 2021, we had income from forgiveness of debt for the forgiveness of Paycheck Protection Plan (PPP) Loans of $461,125 and $175,682 for our subsidiaries CHI and AHA, respectively.
Impairment of Series E investment
Pursuant to the AHA IP purchase agreement in 2020 with our subsidiary CHI, we recorded a Series E Preferred Stock investment in AHA at $6,402,278 based on 1,252,892 shares outstanding at a fair value of $5.11 per share based on an appraised valuation of the AHA Series E Preferred Stock. As of December 31, 2020, we determined that the fair value of the AHA Series E Preferred Stock fell below its’ carrying value based on an independent valuation report and wrote off the investment in AHA. The Preferred Stock was surrendered pursuant to the AHA Merger Agreement.
Interest Income
Interest income for the year ended December 31, 2021, was $917 as compared to $1,030 for the year ended December 31, 2020. Interest income reflects interest earned on cash held in deposit accounts.
Interest Expense
Interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2021, was $6.8 million as compared to $335,450 for the year ended December 31, 2020. Interest expense was primarily for accretion of debt of $6,011,071 combined with $784,012 interest incurred on convertible debt related to the acquisition of AHA.
Income Tax Benefit
For the year ended December 31, 2021, income tax benefit was recorded for the valuation allowance against the deferred tax liability of $984,810 recorded on the intangible assets acquired from AHA and Procare.
Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests was $891 for the year ended December 31, 2021, from our noncontrolling interest in the AHP VIE.
Table of Contents 39
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
General
We had cash of $15,314,328 for the year ended December 31, 2021, compared to $26,931 as of December 31, 2020, an increase of $15,287,397.
We generate cash primarily from capitations, risk pool settlements and incentives, fees for medical management services provided to our physician groups, as well as FFS reimbursements and recurring SaaS Subscriptions.
Historically, the Company’s has experienced significant losses and the major sources of cash have been comprised of proceeds from various public and private offerings of its common stock, debt financings, and option and warrant exercises. During the year ended December 31, 2021, the Company raised approximately $14.4 million in gross proceeds from various public and private offerings of its common stock. Although the Company expects to have sufficient capital to fund its obligations, as they become due, in the ordinary course of business until at least December 31, 2022, the actual amount of cash that it will need to operate is subject to many factors. During the year ended December 31, 2022, the Company expects to collect the receivable of $1.3 million from the sale of its ACMG investment. The Company also decreased its debt in 2021. With the funds raised and the other mitigating factors the Company believes that it has enough cash to fund its operations for one year from the date of filing. Therefore, such conditions of substantial doubt as of December 31, 2021, have subsequently been alleviated.
Cash Flow Activity
Cash used in operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2021, was $6,703,530 as compared to cash used in operating activities of $1,475,075 for the year ended December 31, 2020. The increase in cash used in operating activities was primarily driven by our operating revenues not being sufficient to cover our on-going obligations. Additional contributing factors include an increase in accounts receivable of $74,880, an increase in account payable and accrued expenses of $1,365,554, a decrease in customer deposits of $36,691, an increase in prepaid expenses of $161,155, income from forgiveness of debt of $633,125, deferred tax benefit of $984,810, amortization and depreciation expense of $713,779, interest expense associated with debt discount of $6,011,071, increase in accrued interest of $197,033, an AHP purchase price adjustment of $300,000, a settlement payment of $522,000 from ACMG , non-cash interest expense of $24,372, a decrease in deposits and other assets of $410, a decrease in lease liability of $27,472, an increase in deferred revenue of $97,232 and stock-based compensation expense of $4,026,884.
Cash provided by investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2021, was $7,951,570, primarily due to $4,554,676 from the proceeds of the sale of ACMG. $522,000 in a separation payment from the investment in ACMG and $3,884,583 of cash acquired in the acquisitions of AHP and Procare, and preacquisition loan from subsidiary of $85,000, offset by $1,094,689 in AHP litigation settlement, compared to cash used in investing activities of $60,900 for the year ended December 31, 2020.
Cash provided by financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2021, was $14,039,357, primarily due to $14,323,439 in proceeds from sale of common stock, $153,424 in proceeds from exercise of warrants, $178,842 in proceeds from exercise of options and $413,917 from issuance of notes and convertible notes payable, offset by $16,765 in payments on notes payable and $1,013,500 in payments of financing costs for capital raise.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
Our management’s discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based on our financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of financial statements may require us to make estimates and assumptions that may affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the related disclosures at the date of the financial statements. We do not currently have any estimates or assumptions where the nature of the estimates or assumptions is material due to the levels of subjectivity and judgment necessary to account for highly uncertain matters or the susceptibility of such matters to change or the impact of the estimates and assumptions on financial condition or operating performance is material, except as described below.
Table of Contents 40
Principles of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, Clinigence Health, Inc., Accountable Healthcare America Inc., AHP Management Inc., and Procare Health, Inc. All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.
Use of Estimates in the Preparation of Financial Statements
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. The Company’s significant estimates used in these financial statements include, but are not limited to, accounts receivable reserves, the valuation allowance related to the Company’s deferred tax assets, the recoverability and useful lives of long-lived assets, debt conversion features, stock-based compensation, certain assumptions related to the valuation of the reserved shares and the assets acquired and liabilities assumed related to the Company’s acquisitions. Certain of the Company’s estimates could be affected by external conditions, including those unique to the Company and general economic conditions. It is reasonably possible that these external factors could have an effect on the Company’s estimates and could cause actual results to differ from those estimates.
Fair Value Measurements
We adopted the provisions of ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, which defines fair value as used in numerous accounting pronouncements, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosure of fair value measurements.
The estimated fair value of certain financial instruments, including cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued expenses are carried at historical cost basis, which approximates their fair values because of the short-term nature of these instruments. The carrying amounts of our short- and long-term credit obligations approximate fair value because the effective yields on these obligations, which include contractual interest rates taken together with other features such as concurrent issuances of warrants and/or embedded conversion options, are comparable to rates of returns for instruments of similar credit risk. The Company’s investment in AHA was valued at level 3 input.
ASC 820 defines fair value as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. ASC 820 also establishes a fair value hierarchy, which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. ASC 820 describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:
Level 1 - quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities
Level 2 - quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets or inputs that are observable
Level 3 - inputs that are unobservable (for example cash flow modeling inputs based on assumptions)
Convertible Instruments
The Company evaluates and accounts for conversion options embedded in convertible instruments in accordance with ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging Activities.
Applicable GAAP requires companies to bifurcate conversion options from their host instruments and account for them as free standing derivative financial instruments according to certain criteria. The criteria include circumstances in which (a) the economic characteristics and risks of the embedded derivative instrument are not clearly and closely related to the economic characteristics and risks of the host contract, (b) the hybrid instrument that embodies both the embedded derivative instrument and the host contract is not re-measured at fair value under other GAAP with changes in fair value reported in earnings as they occur and (c) a separate instrument with the same terms as the embedded derivative instrument would be considered a derivative instrument.
Table of Contents 41
The Company accounts for convertible instruments (when it has been determined that the embedded conversion options should not be bifurcated from their host instruments) as follows: The Company records, when necessary, discounts to convertible notes for the intrinsic value of conversion options embedded in debt instruments based upon the differences between the fair value of the underlying common stock at the commitment date of the note transaction and the effective conversion price embedded in the note. Debt discounts under these arrangements are amortized over the term of the related debt to their stated date of redemption.
The Company accounts for the conversion of convertible debt when a conversion option has been bifurcated using the general extinguishment standards. The debt and equity linked derivatives are removed at their carrying amounts and the shares issued are measured at their then-current fair value, with any difference recorded as a gain or loss on extinguishment of the two separate accounting liabilities.
Variable interest model
We perform a primary beneficiary analysis on all our identified variable interest entities, which comprises a qualitative analysis based on power and economics. We consolidate a VIE if both power and benefits belong to us - that is, we (i) have the power to direct the activities of a VIE that most significantly influence the VIE’s economic performance (power), and (ii) have the obligation to absorb losses of, or the right to receive benefits from, the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE (benefits). We consolidate VIEs whenever it is determined that we are the primary beneficiary.
Noncontrolling Interests
We consolidate variable interest entities (VIEs) in which the Company is the primary beneficiary. Noncontrolling interests represent the amount of net income attributable to the VIEs and is disclosed in the consolidated statements of income.
Revenue Recognition
Revenue is generated by software licenses, training, and consulting. Software licenses are provided as SaaS-based subscriptions that grants access to proprietary online databases and data management solutions. Training and consulting are project based and billable to customers on a monthly-basis or task-basis.
Revenue from training and consulting are generally recognized upon delivery of training or completion of the consulting project. The duration of training and consulting projects are typically a few weeks or months and last no longer than 12 months.
SaaS-based subscriptions are generally marketed under multi-year agreements with annual, semi-annual, quarterly, or month-to-month renewals and revenue is recognized ratably over the renewal period with the unearned amounts received recorded as deferred revenue. For multiple-element arrangements accounted for in accordance with specific software accounting guidance, multiple deliverables are segregated into units of accounting which are delivered items that have value to a customer on a standalone basis.
On January 1, 2019, the Company adopted the new revenue recognition standard Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)”, using the modified retrospective method. The modified retrospective adoption used by the Company did not result in a material cumulative effect adjustment to the opening balance of accumulated deficit. Revenue from substantially all the Company’s contracts with customers continues to be recognized over time as performance obligations are satisfied.
Table of Contents 42
The Company provides its customers with software licensing, training, and consulting through SaaS-based subscriptions. This subscription revenue represents revenue earned under contracts in which the Company bills and collects the charges for licensing and related services. The Company determines the measurement of revenue and the timing of revenue recognition utilizing the following core principles:
1. Identifying the contract with a customer;
2. Identifying the performance obligations in the contract;
3. Determining the transaction price;
4. Allocating the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract; and
5. Recognizing revenue when (or as) the Company satisfies its performance obligations.
Revenues from subscriptions are deferred and recorded as deferred revenue when cash payments are received in advance of the satisfaction of the Company’s performance obligations and recognized over the period in which the performance obligations are satisfied. The Company completes its contractual performance obligations through providing its customers access to specified data through subscriptions for a service period, and training on consulting associated with the subscriptions. The Company primarily invoices its customers on a monthly basis and does not provide any refunds, rights of return, or warranties to its customers.
AHA’s performance obligation is to manage ACO participants who provide healthcare services to CMS’s members for the purpose of generating shared savings. If achieved, the Company receives shared savings payments from CMS, which represents variable consideration. The shared savings payments are recognized using the most likely methodology. However, as the Company does not have sufficient insight from CMS into the financial performance of the shared risk pool because of unknown factors related to shifting patient count, risk adjustment factors and benchmark adjustments, among other factors, an estimate cannot be developed. Therefore, these amounts are considered to be fully constrained and only recorded in the months when such payments are known and/or received. The Company generally receives payment within ten months after the fiscal year-end.
AHP negotiates fixed per-member, per-month (PMPM) rates (Capitation) with third-party insurers for a fixed period of time. The Independent Physicians Association (“IPA”) recognizes capitation payments received in advance from third-party insurers as revenue on a monthly basis without regard to the frequency, extent, or nature of the medical services actually furnished.
Procare’s revenue is generated primarily through management fees that are received based on Gross Capitation Revenues of the IPA/Physician Groups. Revenue is paid monthly and is a flat fixed rate determined by the agreement. In addition to Management Fees, there is revenue generated through consultant services that are charged as a flat fixed rate and represent a small portion of the total revenue.
Cost of Sales
Our costs of sales primarily consist of cloud computing and storage costs, datasets, contracted and internal labor costs and contracted medical provider services.
Advertising Costs
We expense advertising costs as incurred. Advertising costs of $24,449 and $41,418 were charged to operations for the years ended December 31, 2021, and 2020, respectively.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents are comprised of cash and highly liquid investments with original maturities of 90 days or less at the date of purchase. We do not have any cash equivalents as of December 31, 2021, and 2020. We are exposed to credit risk in the event of default by the financial institutions or the issuers of these investments to the extent the amounts on deposit or invested are in excess of amounts that are insured.
Table of Contents 43
Accounts Receivable
The Company analyzes the collectability of accounts receivable from continuing operations each accounting period and adjusts its allowance for doubtful accounts accordingly. A considerable amount of judgment is required in assessing the realization of accounts receivables, including the creditworthiness of each customer, current and historical collection history and the related aging of past due balances. The Company evaluates specific accounts when it becomes aware of information indicating that a customer may not be able to meet its financial obligations due to deterioration of its financial condition, lower credit ratings, bankruptcy or other factors affecting the ability to render payment. As of December 31, 2021, no customers represented more than 10% of total accounts receivable.
Inventory
Inventory consisting of finished products is stated at the lower of cost or net realizable value.
Property and equipment and depreciation
Property and equipment are stated at cost. Maintenance and repairs are charged to expense when incurred. When property and equipment are retired or otherwise disposed of, the related cost and accumulated depreciation are removed from the respective accounts and any gain or loss is credited or charged to income. Depreciation for both financial reporting and income tax purposes is computed using combinations of the straight line and accelerated methods over the estimated lives of the respective assets as follows:
Office equipment and fixtures 5 - 7 years
Computer hardware 5 years
Computer software 3 years
Development equipment 5 years
Business Combinations
We use the acquisition method of accounting for all business combinations, which requires assets and liabilities of the acquiree to be recorded at fair value, to measure the fair value of the consideration transferred, including contingent consideration, to be determined on the acquisition date, and to account for acquisition related costs separately from the business combination.
Amortization
Intangible assets are amortized using the straight-line method over the estimated lives of the respective assets as follows:
Developed technology 13 years
Customer relationships 10 years
Goodwill
Goodwill represents the net identifiable assets acquired and the liabilities assumed of Procare, AHA and AHP and the fair market value of the common shares issued by the Company for the acquisition of Procare, AHA and AHP. In accordance with ASC Topic No. 350 “Intangibles - Goodwill and Other”), the goodwill is not being amortized, but instead will be subject to an annual assessment of impairment by applying a fair-value based test and will be reviewed more frequently if current events and circumstances indicate a possible impairment. An impairment loss is charged to expense in the period identified. If indicators of impairment are present and future cash flows are not expected to be sufficient to recover the asset’s carrying amount, an impairment loss is charged to expense in the period identified. No impairment was recorded during the year ended December 31, 2021.
Table of Contents 44
Long-Lived Assets
We assess the valuation of components of our property and equipment and other long-lived assets whenever events or circumstances dictate that the carrying value might not be recoverable. We base our evaluation on indicators such as the nature of the assets, the future economic benefit of the assets, any historical or future profitability measurements and other external market conditions or factors that may be present. If such factors indicate that the carrying amount of an asset or asset group may not be recoverable, we determine whether an impairment has occurred by analyzing an estimate of undiscounted future cash flows at the lowest level for which identifiable cash flows exist. If the estimate of undiscounted cash flows during the estimated useful life of the asset is less than the carrying value of the asset, we recognize a loss for the difference between the carrying value of the asset and its estimated fair value, generally measured by the present value of the estimated cash flows.
Deferred Revenue
Deposits from customers are not recognized as revenues, but as liabilities, until the following conditions are met: revenues are realized when cash or claims to cash (receivable) are received in exchange for goods or services or when assets received in such exchange are readily convertible to cash or claim to cash or when such goods/services are transferred. When such income item is earned, the related revenue item is recognized, and the deferred revenue is reduced. To the extent revenues are generated from our support and maintenance services, we recognize such revenues when services are completed and billed. We received deposits from our various customers that have been recorded as deferred revenue and presented as current liabilities in the amount of $173,919 and $76,687 as of December 31, 2021, and 2020, respectively.
Stock-Based Compensation
We account for our stock-based awards granted under our employee compensation plan in accordance with ASC Topic No. 718-20, Awards Classified as Equity, which requires the measurement of compensation expense for all share-based compensation granted to employees and non-employee directors at fair value on the date of grant and recognition of compensation expense over the related service period for awards expected to vest. We use the Black-Scholes option pricing model to estimate the fair value of its stock options and warrants. The Black-Scholes option pricing model requires the input of highly subjective assumptions including the expected stock price volatility of the Company’s common stock, the risk-free interest rate at the date of grant, the expected vesting term of the grant, expected dividends, and an assumption related to forfeitures of such grants. Changes in these subjective input assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimate of the Company’s stock options and warrants.
Income Taxes
We account for income taxes using the asset and liability method in accordance with ASC Topic No. 740, Income Taxes. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on differences between financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities and are measured using the enacted tax rates and laws that are expected to be in effect when the differences are expected to reverse.
We apply the provisions of ASC Topic No. 740 for the financial statement recognition, measurement and disclosure of uncertain tax positions recognized in our financial statements. In accordance with this provision, tax positions must meet a more-likely-than-not recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
We have reviewed other recent accounting pronouncements and concluded they are either not applicable to the business, or no material effect is expected on the condensed consolidated financial statements as a result of future adoption.
Table of Contents 45
OFF BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
We have no off balance-sheet arrangements.

---

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Not Required.

---

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
The Financial Statements required by this Item 8 are included in this Report beginning on page, as follows:
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (PCAOB ID Number 688)
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2021 and 2020
Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholder’s Equity for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020
Notes to Financial Statements

---

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.

---

ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Under the supervision and with the participation of our senior management, including our chief executive officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), as of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K (the “Evaluation Date”). Based on this evaluation, our chief executive officer concluded as of the Evaluation Date that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective such that the information relating to us required to be disclosed in our Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) reports (i) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms, and (ii) is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our chief executive officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the year ended December 31, 2021, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Table of Contents 46
Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Our internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving their control objectives. With the participation of our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, our management conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2021, based on the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”) in Internal Control - Integrated Framework.
Based upon such evaluation, our management concluded that we did maintain effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2021 based on the COSO framework criteria, as more fully described below.
Limitations on Effectiveness of Controls and Procedures
In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives. In addition, the design of disclosure controls and procedures must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and that management is required to apply its judgment in evaluating the benefits of possible controls and procedures relative to their costs.

---

ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION
None.
Table of Contents 47
PART III

---

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
Our board of directors manages our business and affairs. Under our Articles of Incorporation and Amended and Restated Bylaws, the Board of directors must consist of one or more members and those members hold office until the expiration of the term for which elected and until such director’s successor is elected and qualified or until such director’s earlier death, resignation or removal. Currently, our Board consists of ten directors, of which seven directors were appointed to serve on October 29, 2019, three were appointed on February 26, 2021 and one was appointed on July 14, 2021.
Warren Hosseinion, M.D., Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board and Director
On February 26, 2021, Dr. Hosseinion was appointed Chief Executive Officer of Clinigence Holdings, Inc. Dr. Hosseinion has served as Chairman of the Board for Clinigence Holdings, Inc. since April 2019. Dr. Hosseinion is a Co-Founder of Apollo Medical Holdings, Inc. (Nasdaq: AMEH) and served as a member of the Board of Directors of Apollo Medical Holdings, Inc. since July 2008, the Chief Executive Officer of Apollo Medical Holdings, Inc. from July 2008 to December 2017, and the Co-Chief Executive Officer of Apollo Medical Holdings, Inc. from December 2017 to March 2019. In 2001, Dr. Hosseinion co-founded ApolloMed Hospitalists. Dr. Hosseinion received his B.S. in Biology from the University of San Francisco, his M.S. in Physiology and Biophysics from the Georgetown University Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, his Medical Degree from the Georgetown University School of Medicine, and completed his residency in internal medicine from the Los Angeles County-University of Southern California Medical Center. Dr. Hosseinion’s qualifications to serve on our Board of Directors include his position as our Chief Executive Officer of the Company. In addition, Dr. Hosseinion as a physician along with his background at Apollo Medical Holdings, Inc. brings to our Board of Directors and our Company a depth of understanding of physician culture and the healthcare market, as well as a strong knowledge of the public markets.
Fred Sternberg, President and Director
Mr. Sternberg has served as the CEO of Accountable Healthcare America, Inc. since 2014. Mr. Sternberg has been instrumental in negotiating for and acquiring ACMG, the first ACO to be acquired by AHA. In 1996, Mr. Sternberg as a founder, was instrumental in forming Metropolitan Health Networks, Inc. (MDF: AMEX). In February 2000, He became Chairman of the Board of Directors, President and CEO, where he served through March 2003. Metropolitan was a Medical Services Organization that provides and coordinates medical care for approximately 87,500 Medicare Advantage, Medicaid, and other beneficiaries, primarily in Florida utilizing a primary care-centric business model. Metropolitan’s integrated care delivery systems include approximately 35 state-of-the-art primary care medical centers and a robust network of affiliated physicians serving mainly Humana members. Metropolitan Health Networks was sold to Humana for $850m. MetCare Health Plans which was also sold to Humana for $14m. Metcare Health Plans provided Medicare Advantage plan, called AdvantageCare, to about 7,000 beneficiaries in 13 Florida counties. Previously, as President of Sternco, Inc., Mr. Sternberg was providing consulting services to various healthcare companies in the managed care and related industries. In 1968, Mr. Sternberg acquired the J. Bird Moyer Co., Inc. and took it public. Later the name was changed to Moyco Technologies, Inc., a publicly traded dental products manufacturing company. Mr. Sternberg has also provided consulting services to Assisted Care living facilities and skilled nursing homes.
Michael Bowen, Chief Financial Officer
Mr. Bowen has served as the CFO of Accountable Healthcare America, Inc. since 2014. Mr. Bowen, has over 50 years of broad experience in the world of finance including public transactions such as Initial Public Offerings, mergers and acquisitions, private equity transactions and extensive experience of international securities markets. For the past 10 years, Mr. Bowen has been Chief Financial Officer for a predecessor company of AHA and for AHA. He began his career at Goldman, Sachs & Co.in 1965 where he became a Vice President of the Corporate Finance Department and latterly helped establish the Tokyo office for Goldman Sachs. In 1976, he joined Salomon Brothers with the task of helping establish their first Asian office located in Honk Kong. He then moved to London to rebuild the International Capital Markets business for Chase Manhattan Ltd, the merchant banking arm of Chase Manhattan Bank where he was responsible for all of the international securities business of the bank/merchant bank. Mr. Bowen ended his international career as a Main Board Director for Kleinwort Benson, a British merchant bank where he was responsible for corporate finance business within the USA. Mr. Bowen returned to the US and, after a period of semi-retirement, in 2004 became CFO of TruBamboo, Inc. an innovative company selling bamboo houseware products to large US retailers. In 2008 he joined Diversified Health & Fitness as CFO and in 2014 became CFO of AHA. Mr. Bowen has an MBA from the Darden School of the University of Virginia and a BA also from UVA
Table of Contents 48
Lawrence Schimmel, M.D., Chief Medical Information Officer
Dr. Schimmel is the Chief Medical Officer of Clinigence Holdings, Inc. since April 2019. Dr. Schimmel served as Chief Executive Officer of Clinigence Holdings, Inc. from July 2020 to February 2021. In 2013 he co-founded and served as Chief Medical Officer of QualMetrix, Inc., a healthcare analytics company headquartered in South Florida, until QualMetrix, Inc. merger with Clinigence LLC. Dr. Schimmel is also the founding Chairman of Professional Bank headquartered in South Florida from 2018 to present. Previously, Dr. Schimmel was the managing partner of Allied Health Advisors, LLC a boutique healthcare consulting company in Miami. Dr. Schimmel is a serial medical-related business entrepreneur having been Co-founder and CEO of Allied Health Group, a national medical management company, and Florida Specialty Network. Allied Health Group and Florida Specialty Network managed approximately $500 million in provider payments on behalf of managed care organizations for approximately 3 million lives during his time as CEO. Allied Health Group was a licensed TPA in Florida and Texas and acted as a third-party intermediary in other areas of the country. Previously, Dr. Schimmel was the Founding Chairman and served on the Board of Directors of Megabank and subsequently served on the Board of Directors of Executive National Bank in South Florida. Dr. Schimmel practiced General and Vascular Surgery in the Miami community for 18 years. In addition to his lengthy medical career as a general and vascular surgeon, he held a management role with the South Florida Surgical Group, and has consulted for physicians, hospitals, healthcare delivery systems, and Fortune 500 companies.
He received his B.A. from Rutgers College, received his Doctor of Medicine degree from the New Jersey College of Medicine and conducted his post graduate training at the University of Miami.
Elisa Luqman, Executive Vice President of Finance and General Counsel
Ms. Luqman served as the Chief Financial Officer and General Counsel of Clinigence Holdings, Inc since October 29, 2019 where Ms. Luqman was responsible for maintaining the corporation’s accounting records and statements all CLNH’s SEC filings and compliance requirements. Ms. Luqman also serves as a Director and Secretary of the Board for Clinigence Holdings, Inc. Ms. Luqman was the co-founder of bigVault Storage Technologies a cloud- based file hosting company acquired by Digi-Data Corporation in February 2006. From March 1, 2006 through February 28, 2009, Ms. Luqman was employed as Chief Operating Officer of the Vault Services Division of Digi-Data Corporation, and subsequently during her tenure with Digi-Data Corporation she became General Counsel for the entire corporation. In that capacity she was responsible for acquisitions, mergers, patents, customer, supplier, and employee contracts, and worked very closely with Digi-Data’s outside counsel firms. On March 1, 2009, Ms. Luqman rejoined iGambit Inc. (“IGMB”) as Chief Financial Officer and General Counsel. Ms. Luqman has overseen and been responsible for IGMB’s SEC filings, FINRA filings and public company compliance requirements from its initial Form10 filing with the SEC in 2010 through its’ Reverse Merger with Clinigence Holdings, Inc. on October 29, 2019. Ms. Luqman received a BA degree, a JD in Law, and an MBA Degree in Finance from Hofstra University. Ms. Luqman is a member of the bar in New York and New Jersey.
Andrew Barnett, Executive Vice President of Corporate Development
Mr. Barnett has served as Executive Vice President of Corporate Development for Accountable Healthcare America, Inc. since its inception in 2014. Throughout his career, Mr. Barnett has been engaged in various aspects of the health care industries. Mr. Barnett served as Vice President of Corporate Development of Dental Partners, Inc., a dental practice management company. At Dental Partners, he was responsible for establishing a $15 million bank line of credit, closing on $30 million of acquisitions, and selling the company. At Trident, a PPM, Mr. Barnett assisted in raising over $20 million through a private placement and assisted in $60 million of acquisitions. Prior to Trident, Mr. Barnett served as Executive Vice President and Director of Metropolitan Health Networks, Inc. (MDF: AMEX) where he was involved in raising capital, acquisitions, and the Company’s initial public offering. Mr. Barnett received a B.S. degree from Pennsylvania State University.
Table of Contents 49
Robert Chan, M.D., Director and President AHP
Dr. Chan has served as Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of AHP IPA since 2015. Dr. Chan is affiliated with several HMOs and IPAs. As a hospitalist physician, Dr. Chan is on the staff of multiple local hospitals. Dr. Chan received his B.S. in Biology from the University of California, Irvine, his Medical Degree from the University of California, Irvine College of Medicine, and completed his residency in internal medicine from the University of California, Los Angeles. Dr. Chan’s qualifications to serve on our Board of Directors include his position as Chief Executive Officer of AHP IPA. In addition, Dr. Chan as a physician along with his background at various healthcare organizations, brings to our Board of Directors and our Company a depth of understanding of physician culture and the healthcare markets.
Non-Management Directors
Terence Martin Breslin, Director
From 2016 to 2019 Mr. Breslin was the Chief Executive Officer of QualMetrix, Inc. and was responsible for charting QualMetrix, Inc.'s strategic direction to drive customer value for payer and provider organizations. In 2013 Mr. Breslin joined QualMetrix, Inc. as an investor and co-founder, later assuming the roles of chairman and Chief Executive Officer. He has extensive experience with technology companies that serve healthcare as well as other industries. Prior to QualMetrix, Inc., Mr. Breslin founded VSS Monitoring. VSS, which focused on the network packet broker market, quickly established itself as an industry leader and, in 2011, was recognized as the Silicon Valley's ninth-fastest-growing privately held company. Mr. Breslin later sold VSS to Danaher Corp. where he remained for two years serving as president of the VSS unit and as chief technology officer for Danaher's $1 billion in revenue communications division.
Mr. Breslin has played both executive and advisory roles at a number of technology start-ups, including a Switzerland-based healthcare technology firm. His experience there led to an interest in the application of advanced analytics in healthcare.
Mr. Breslin holds a Master of Business Administration from Golden Gate University of San Francisco. He received a Bachelor's degree in Engineering from the University of Ulster in Northern Ireland as well as a Bachelor's degree in Computer Science from National University of Ireland, Maynooth.
Mitchell Creem, Director
Mr. Creem has spent over 30 years as a “C-level” executive of healthcare organizations, and he brings strong business evaluation and operational experience to the Company. Since July 2017 to Present Mr. Creem has served as President of The Bridgewater Healthcare Group, which provides hospital and health network management services and performance consulting. From October 2015 to July 2017 Mr. Creem served as the CEO of Verity Health System, a six-hospital system in California. Prior to this, he served as the CFO and Board Member of ApolloMed from October 2012 to October 2015. Prior to ApolloMed, he served as the CEO of the Keck Hospital of USC and USC Norris Cancer Center. Prior to his tenure at USC, he served as the CFO and Associate Vice Chancellor of UCLA Health Sciences, including UCLA Medical Center, the Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, and UCLA Faculty Practice. Prior to UCLA, he served as CFO of Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, a Harvard University teaching hospital, and CFO of Tufts University Medical Center. Prior to this, he worked for several years in a senior management position at the healthcare practice group of PricewaterhouseCoopers, where he was responsible for numerous consulting engagements, financial statement audits and financial feasibility studies. He has been a guest lecturer at USC, UCLA and Harvard. Mr. Creem holds a B.S. in Accounting and Business Administration from Boston University and a Master’s degree in Health Administration from Duke University.
Table of Contents 50
Mark Fawcett, Director, Compensation Committee Chairman
Mr. Fawcett has served as Senior Vice President and Treasurer of Fresenius Medical Care Holdings, Inc. (“FMCH”) and its subsidiaries. FMCH is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co. KGaA (NYSE: FMS) (collectively with FMCH and their respective subsidiaries, “FMS”). FMS is a leading provider of chronic kidney failure products and services. Prior to joining FMS, Mr. Fawcett was a director of corporate finance at BankBoston beginning in 1997. Mr. Fawcett held various positions of increasing responsibility beginning in 1988 as an investment banker with Merrill Lynch in New York and London, and then at The Bank of New York. Mr. Fawcett has been a member of the board of directors of Apollo Medical Holdings, Inc. (Nasdaq: AMEH) (“ApolloMed”) since January 2016 and previously served as member of the Board and Chairman of the Compensation Committee of the Company from October 2019 to June 2020. Mr. Fawcett graduated with a B.A. in psychology from Wesleyan University and a M.B.A. from Columbia Business School at Columbia University.
Jacob Margolin, Director
Mr. Margolin is a director of Clinigence Holdings, Inc. Mr. Margolin served as Chief Executive Officer of Clinigence Holdings, Inc. from April 2019 to July 2020. Mr. Margolin is a successful serial entrepreneur with over 25 years’ experience in HIT, and is the Co-Founder of Clinigence, LLC. In the mid-1990’s, Mr. Margolin co-founded a pioneering Medical Imaging technology company and led its marketing, global business development and North American operations through a $50 million acquisition by Carestream Health (2004). In 2005, he joined Accelerad - a Georgia Tech Advanced Technology Development Center (ATDC) incubator company acquired in 2014 by Nuance Communications (NASDAQ: NUAN). In 2008, he started a consulting firm helping Israeli medical technologies enter the US market. In 2010, Mr. Margolin founded Clinigence, LLC with the vision that big data and business intelligence technologies would become crucial to the healthcare industry. Mr. Margolin holds an MS degree in medical physics (magna cum laude) and BS degrees in Mathematics and Physics (magna cum laude) from Tel-Aviv University in Israel. He is a board member of the American-Israeli Chamber of Commerce and a member of the Technology Association of Georgia (TAG) and HIMSS.
David Meiri, Director
Mr. Meiri was a member of the Board of Managers of Clinigence, LLC. Since 2014 Mr. Meiri has served as a Director of Software Engineering in the Xtremio Division of Dell EMC, has been leading a project for Native Replication of contents-based data storage, David has received multiple awards for innovation at Dell EMC, including the 2018 and 2019 prolific inventor awards, and holds close to a hundred patents. He has led several such projects for third parties resulting in the successful commercialization of products. Mr. Meiri has expertise in high-performance multi-threaded systems, storage arrays and data replication. Since 1997 he has developed, innovated, and led teams building products in diverse technologies such as synchronous and asynchronous remote replication, business continuity, high availability, clones & snapshots, active/active replication, and performance optimization. Mr. Meiri has researched virtualization technologies and integration of hypervisors with storage products. This led him to work on federation, cluster algorithms and cloud infrastructure. Other areas Mr. Meiri is interested in are caching, data reduction, encryption, data deduplication and compression. He holds 78 US issued patents with an additional 30 pending. Mr. Meiri holds a Ph.D. in Mathematics (Ergodic Theory), from the Hebrew University in Jerusalem, Israel.
Brandon Sim, Director
Mr. Sim is the Chief Operating Officer and Chief Technology Officer at ApolloMed,, where he is responsible for the Company's overall strategy, end-to-end service delivery, non-clinical operations, and all technology aspects of ApolloMed's business, including engineering, IT, data science, and more. He has been the CTO of ApolloMed and its subsidiary, Network Medical Management, since 2019. Prior to joining ApolloMed, Mr. Sim served as a Quantitative Researcher at Citadel Securities from 2015 to 2019. From 2012 to 2015, Mr. Sim co-founded and served as Chief Technology Officer at Theratech, a medical device company focused on developing a low-cost, simple-to-use patch for automated drug delivery. Mr. Sim received both his M.S. in computer science and engineering and B.A. in statistics and physics, magna cum laude with high honors, from Harvard University. Mr. Sim’s qualifications to serve on the Board include his extensive experience and expertise in healthcare management services and population health management technology, including as Chief Operating Officer and Chief Technology Officer of ApolloMed.
Table of Contents 51
John Waters, Director, Audit Committee Chairman
Mr. Waters is a former Senior Partner at Arthur Andersen (1967-2001) with exceptional leadership skills in mergers and acquisitions (particularly reverse mergers) and 1933 Act fillings with the SEC. In the last fifteen years with the firm Mr. Waters built three very successful businesses within Andersen in the areas of merger and acquisition, manufacturing and entertainment. In 2001, Mr. Waters started his own merger and acquisition advisory consulting business and has consummated the acquisition of three manufacturing companies with combined annual sales of $50 million. In 2003, he participated in a group that acquired A-1 Components Corp., a wholly owned subsidiary of United Technologies Corp. Mr. Waters led due diligence efforts and created a tax structure beneficial to both the buyer and seller. In September 2004 participated with a group of investors that acquired Metpar Corp., a $19 million manufacturer of metal sanitary and plastic plumbing fixtures. In October 2007, he participated with a group of investors that acquired World Dryer Corporation, a $20 million manufacturer of hand dryer products. He prepared pro-forma financial statements for the lenders and assisted in obtaining financing for these transactions. In July of 2004 he was appointed Chief Administrative Officer of Authentidate Holding Corp. and led a massive restructuring of the business and hired an entirely new executive management team. In January of 2006 he was appointed Chief Financial Officer of Avantair Inc., which was taken public through a merger with a Special Purpose Acquisition Company (SPAC) and raised $60 million in capital for this company. Mr. Waters served as an Advisor to the Board of Directors of iGambit, Inc. Previously he was a member of the Board of Directors of iGambit and served as a member of the Audit Committee. Mr. Waters is a Certified Public Accountant, Member of AICPA and New York State Society of CPA's and has a BBA degree from Iona College.
The names, ages, positions and dates appointed of our current directors and executive officers are set forth below.
(1) Name Age Position
Executive Officers and Directors
Dr. Warren Hosseinion Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board
Fred Sternberg President, Director
Michael Bowen Chief Financial Officer
Dr. Lawrence Schimmel Chief Medical Information Officer
Elisa Luqman General Counsel, EVP of Finance and Director
Andrew Barnett Executive Vice President of Corporate Development
Dr. Robert Chan President AHP Health Services, Inc., Director
Non-Management Directors
Martin Breslin Director
Mitchell Creem Director
Mark Fawcett Director
Jacob Margolin Director
David Meiri Director
Brandon Sim Director
John Waters Director
(1) Unless otherwise noted, the address of record for the directors and officers is 2455 East Sunrise Blvd., Suite 1204 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33304
No director or executive officer is party to any arrangement or understanding with another person under which he or she was selected as a director or officer (as applicable).
Table of Contents 52
COMMITTEES OF THE BOARD
The Board has established an Audit Committee and a Compensation Committee and Governance and Nominating Committee.
Audit Committee
The Audit Committee is responsible for monitoring and reviewing our financial statements and internal controls over financial reporting. In addition, they recommend the selection of the independent auditors and consult with management and our independent auditors prior to the presentation of financial statements to stockholders and the filing of our forms 10-Q and 10-K. The Audit Committee has adopted a charter and it is posted on our web site at www.clinigencehealth.com.
The Audit Committee consists of Messrs. John Waters, Mitchell Creem and Terence Breslin, with Mr. Waters serving as Chairman. The Company’s Board of Directors has determined that Mr. Waters is an “audit committee financial expert” (as that term is defined under SEC rules implementing Section 407 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act) and, each of the three audit committee members are “independent” directors that satisfy the heightened audit committee independence requirements under the NASDAQ Listing Rules and Rule 10A-3 of the Exchange Act.
Compensation Committee
The Compensation Committee is responsible for reviewing and recommending to the Board the compensation and over-all benefits of our executive officers. The Compensation Committee may, but is not required to, consult with outside compensation consultants. The Compensation Committee has adopted a charter and the charter is posted on our web site at www.clinigencehealth.com.
The Compensation Committee consists of Messrs. Mark, Fawcett, David Meiri, John Waters, Mitchell Creem, and Terence Breslin.
Governance and Nominating Committee
The Governance and Nominating Committee activities are currently handled by the full board of directors. The Governance and Nominating Committee is responsible for assisting the Board in fulfilling its fiduciary responsibilities with respect to the oversight of the Company’s affairs in the areas of corporate governance and Board membership matters.
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS INVOLVING OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS
None of our directors or executive officers have been involved in any of the legal proceedings described in Item 401(f) of Regulation S-K.
COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 16(A) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE
Based solely upon a review of Forms 3 and 4 and amendments thereto furnished to the Company under Rule 16a-3(e) under the Exchange Act during its most recent fiscal year and through the date hereof and Forms 5 and amendments thereto furnished to the Company with respect to its most recent fiscal year and through the date hereof, and any written representation to the Company from the reporting person that no Form 5 is required, the Form 3 for Mr. Barnett), Mr. Bowen and Ms. Nguyen (merger exchange) and Forms 4 for each of Messrs. Fawcett Hosseinion (merger exchange) were filed late with respect to the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021.
Table of Contents 53
CODE OF ETHICS
The Company has adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that applies to its principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions. A copy of the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics is available on the Company’s website at www.clingencehealth.com.

---

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Summary Compensation Table
The following table sets forth the compensation received by our executive officers, for their service, during the years ended December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020.
Current Officers Name & Principal Position Year Salary Bonus Stock(1) Option Awards(2) Non-equity Incentive Plan Compensation Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings All Other Compensation Total
($) ($) ($) ($) ($) ($) ($) ($)
Warren Hosseinion, CEO 342,805 150,000 964,602 375,263 (3) 1,307,407
0 338,638 338,638
Fred Sternberg, President 232,500 10,000 0 242,500
0 0
Michael Bowen, CFO 167,509 50,000 0 217,509
0 0
Andrew Barnett, EVP Business Development 242,500 10,000 0 252,500
0 0
Elisa Luqman EVP Finance GC 157,600 125,000 2,415 643,068 928,083
133,225 217,328 350,553
(1) Discretionary stock grants made in 2021 for 2020 performance. These amounts reflect the grant date fair values of performance awards. The amounts reported do not reflect compensation actually received.	
(2) Discretionary stock option grants made in 2021 for completion of AHA and AHP Mergers and discretionary stock option grants made in 2020 for performance. These amounts reflect the grant date fair values of performance awards. The amounts reported do not reflect compensation actually received.	
(3) Tax gross-up payment to Mr. Hosseinion for effect of stock option grants pursuant to the AHA AHP Mergers in light of his contributions and this tax being applicable due to Mr. Hosseinion receiving reduced amounts of compensation for his service prior to entering into the AHA and AHP Merger Agreement.
Employment Arrangements with Named Executive Officers
Clinigence is party to three (3) year employment agreements with Elisa Luqman, and Dr. Lawrence Schimmel dated October 29, 2019, and April 1, 2019, respectively. Pursuant to the employment agreements with Ms. Luqman and Dr. Schimmel, each is entitled to receive a base annual salary of $225,000 and 180,000, respectively, during the term. Dr. Hosseinion entered into a five (5) year employment agreement with the Company which became effective on February 26, 2021, and pursuant to which Dr. Hosseinion is entitled to receive a base salary of $475,000 during the term AHA is party to five (5) year employment agreements with each of Fred Sternberg. Michael Bowen and Andrew Barnett, all dated May 1, 2020. Pursuant to the employment agreements with Mr. Sternberg, Mr. Bowen, and Mr. Barnett, each is entitled to receive a base annual salary of $250,000, $225,000, and $250,000, respectively, during the term. The employment agreements for all these officers contain automatic one-year extensions at the end of their respective terms unless notice of non-extension is delivered by either party.
Table of Contents 54
In the event Clinigence (or its successor) terminates an officer’s employment without cause or the officer resigns for good reason, severance benefits would be provided as follows:
Mr. Bowen and Ms. Luqman: twelve months of base salary (and for Ms. Luqman a cash subsidy for group medical, dental and vision programs for twelve months)
Dr. Schimmel, Dr. Hosseinion and Mr. Sternberg; twenty-four months base salary and cash subsidy for continued group medical, dental and vision programs.
Mr. Barnett: base salary for the remaining months of the then current term of his employment agreement. And a cash subsidy for group medical, dental and vision programs for a period of twenty-four (24) months
No severance is payable under the employment agreements if an officer’s employment is terminated by the Company for cause (as defined in the officer’s employment agreement), resigns without good reason (as defined in the officer’s employment agreement, or is unable to perform due to death or disability. An officer is entitled to receive payment of all salary and benefits accrued up to the termination date of his or her employment upon any termination of employment, unpaid expense reimbursements, and accrued but unused paid time off within thirty (30) days.
Additional Narrative Description of Arrangements
Other than Dr. Hosseinion, no named executive officer is entitled to a tax gross-up for golden parachute excise taxes in connection with the Merger. Each employment agreement provides that if the compensation and benefits payable under such agreement would constitute a “parachute payment” under Section 280G of the Code, then the employment agreement or award agreements, as the case may be, (would provide either the full amount or a lesser amount such that no portion is subject to Section 280G, whichever provides the higher after-tax amount, including the potential taxes under Section 4999.) The table above does not reflect any potential cutbacks under this provision.
Early 2022 - New Employment Warren Hosseinion as per Merger
On January 20, 2022, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company approved a new five (5) year employment agreement with Dr. Warren Hosseinion (the “Hosseinion Employment Agreement”) to become effective upon the closing of the Nutex Merger pursuant to which Dr. Hosseinion is entitled to receive a base salary of $750,000 during the term. In the event Clinigence (or its successor) terminates Dr. Hosseinion’s employment without cause or Dr. Hosseinion resigns for good reason, Dr. Hosseinion shall receive twenty-four months base salary and cash subsidy for continued group medical, dental and vision programs as severance benefits.
Grant to Plan Based Awards table
Name Grant Date All other stock awards: Number of shares of stock or units (#) All other option awards; Number of securities underlying options (#)) Exercise of base price of option awards ($/Sh) Grant date fair value of stock option awards
Warren Hosseinion 01/28/2021
600,000 $ 1.55 $ 964.602
Warren Hosseinion 09/09/2021
1,900,000 $ 2.75 $ 5,260,014
Elisa Luqman 01/28/2021 1,500 $ 2,415
Elisa Luqman 01/28/2021
400,000 $ 1.55 $ 643.068
Elisa Luqman 09/09/2021
150,000 $ 2.75 $ 415,264
Table of Contents 55
Equity Compensation Plan Information
In 2019, we adopted the 2019 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan (the "2019 Plan"). Awards granted under the 2019 Plan have a ten-year term and may be incentive stock options, non-statutory stock options, restricted stock, restricted stock units, stock appreciation rights, performance units or performance shares. The awards are granted at an exercise price equal to the fair market value on the date of grant and generally vest over a four-year period.
New Plan Benefits
On March 16, 2022, the shareholders of the Company approved the 2022 Equity Plan which will amend and replace the 2019 Plan upon the closing of the Nutex Merger. Awards granted under the 2022 Plan will have a ten-year term and may be incentive stock options, non-statutory stock options, restricted stock, restricted stock units, stock appreciation rights, performance units or performance shares. The awards are granted at an exercise price equal to the fair market value on the date of grant and generally vest over a four-year period.
The 2022 Equity Plan can be found in its entirety in the Company’s proxy statement filed with the SEC on February 14, 2022, and available at www.sec.gov.
As set forth in the Company’s proxy statement filed with the SEC on February 14, 2022 we did make a Number of Contingent Awards Granted to Employees, Directors and Consultants in 2021.
In September and December of 2021, the Compensation Committee made grants of 3,624,000 Nonqualified Stock Options contingent upon shareholder approval of the 2022 Equity Plan (the “Contingent Awards”) to the executive officers, consultants, and directors under the 2022 Plan as described below.
Number of Contingent Awards Granted to Employees, Directors and Consultants in 2022
Participant Number of Nonqualified Stock Options Per Share
Exercise Price
Warren Hosseinion, M.D., CEO and Chairman of the Board 1,900,000 $ 2.75
Fred Sternberg, President and Director 75,000 $ 2.75
Michael Bowen, CFO 200,000 $ 2.75
Elisa Luqman, EVP of Finance General Counsel 150,000 $ 2.75
Andrew Barnett, Executive VP of M&A 150,000 $ 2.75
Lawrence Schimmel, M.D., President and CMO Clinigence Health, Inc. 200,000 $ 2.75
Paul Rothman, 100,000 $ 2.75
Robert Chan, M.D. Director, CEO AHP Health Management Services, Inc. 50,000 $ 3.50 (1)
Tam Doan 25,000 $ 3.50 (1)
All Executive Officers, as a Group 2,850,000 $ 3.12
All Director who are not Executive Officers as a Group 774,000 $ 3.12
All Employees who are not Directors, as a Group
(1) Options granted to Robert Chan and Tam Doan were granted on 12/17/2021. The share price, as of 12/17/2021, was $3.50.
Table of Contents 56
Compensation of the Board of Directors
The following table sets forth the compensation received by our directors, for their service as directors, during the year ended December 31, 2021.
Name Fees earned or paid in cash
($)
Stock awards ($) Option awards
($) Non-equity incentive plan compensation ($) Nonqualified deferred compensation earnings
($) All other compensation ($) Total
($)
Terence Martin Breslin 74,345 (1) 74,345
Mitchell Creem 74,345 (1) 74,345
Jacob Margolin 74,345 (1) 0
David Meiri 74,345 (1) 74,345
John Waters 74,345 (1) 74,345
(1) 45,000 Stock Options at an exercise price of $1.61. These amounts reflect the grant date fair values of performance awards. The amounts reported do not reflect compensation actually received.
Outstanding Equity Awards under the Plan
Plan category Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a)) Notes
(a) (b) (c)
2019 Equity compensation plans approved by security holders 1,930,000 $ 1.57 70,000 2,000,000
Original reserve when plan approved.
2022 Equity compensation plan approved by security holders 3,624,000 $ 2,80 1,376,000 5,000,000 additional reserve approved March 16, 2022
Total 5,554,000 $ 4.37 1,446,000
The following table sets forth the Outstanding Equity Awards received by our executive officers, for their service, during the year ended December 31, 2021 under the Existing Plan and New Plan.
Option awards Stock awards
Name Number of securities underlying unexercised options (#) exercisable Number of securities underlying unexercised options (#) unexercisable Equity incentive plan awards: Number of securities underlying unexercised unearned options (#) Option exercise price ($) Option expiration date Number of shares or units of stock that have not vested (#) Market value of shares of units of stock that have not vested ($) Equity Equity incentive plan awards: Market or payout value of unearned shares, units or other rights that have not vested ($)
Warren Hosseinion 600,000 1.61 1/28/2031 -
Warren Hosseinion 1,900,000 (1) 2.75 9/9/2031 - -
Elisa Luqman 400,000 1.61 1/28/2031 - 1,500
Elisa Luqman 150,000 (1) 2.75 9/9/2021 - -
Lawrence Schimmel 0 - 107,692
Lawrence Schimmel 200,000 (1) 2.75 9/9/2031 - -
Charles Kandzierski 0 - 14,321
Charles Kandzierski 17,056 1.45 1/28/2031 -
(1) In September and December of 2021, the Compensation Committee made grants of 3,624,000 Nonqualified Stock Options contingent upon shareholder approval of the 2022 Equity Plan (the “Contingent Awards”) to the executive officers, consultants, and directors under the 2022 Plan as described above in the “Number of Contingent Awards Granted to Employees, Directors and Consultants in 2022” table. On March 16, 2022 at the Special Meeting of Shareholders the 2022 Plan was approved.
Table of Contents 57

---

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
The following table sets forth information known to us, as of December 31, 2021, relating to the beneficial ownership of shares of common stock by: (i) each person who is known by us to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of the Company’s outstanding common stock; (ii) each director; (iii) each executive officer; and (iv) all executive officers and directors as a group. Under securities laws, a person is considered to be the beneficial owner of securities owned by him (or certain persons whose ownership is attributed to him) or securities that can be acquired by him within 60 days, including upon the exercise of options, warrants or convertible securities. The Company determines a beneficial owner’s percentage ownership by assuming that options, warrants and convertible securities that are held by the beneficial owner and which are exercisable within 60 days, have been exercised or converted. The Company believes that all persons named in the table have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of common stock shown as being owned by them.
Director and Officers and 5% Beneficial Ownership Common Shares Options CD Warrants Total % Beneficial Ownership
Dominus Embree 6,473,483
500,000 6,973,483 14.39 %
Robert Chan, Director 4,389,691
4,389,691 9.06 %
Warren Hosseinion, Officer and Director 1,151,563 800,000
21,590 1,973,153 (1) 4.07 %
Fred Sternberg, Officer and Director 1,821,672
1,821,672 3.76 %
Andrew Barnett, Officer 1,709,896
1,709,896 3.53 %
Anh Nguyen, Officer 683,134
683,134 1.41 %
Martin Breslin, Director 724,496 130,120
854,616 (2) 1.76 %
Jacob Margolin, Director 574,998 75,000
649,998 (3) 1.34 %
Elisa Luqman Officer and Director 12,870 517,106
529,976 (4) 1.09 %
Michael Bowen, Officer 447,105
447,105 0.92 %
Larry Schimmel, Officer 234,047 36,288 19,597 9,799 299,731 (5) 0.62 %
John Waters, Director 81,746 147,800 64,516 48,508 342,570 (6) 0.71 %
David Meiri, Director 266,627 130,120
396,747 (2) 0.82 %
Mark Fawcett 277,259 85,120
3,598 365,977 (7) 0.76 %
Mitchell Creem, Director 31,746 130,120
161,866 (2) 0.33 %
Charles Kandzierski, Officer 77,379 17,056
94,435 (8) 0.19 %
18,957,712 2,068,730 84,113 583,495 21,694,050 (9) 44.78 %
1. Includes options to purchase 200,000 shares of the common stock at $1.50 per share, options to purchase 600,000 shares of the common stock at $1.61 per share and a warrant to purchase 21,590 common shares at $5.56 per share
2. Includes options to purchase 10,120 shares of the common stock at $5.56 per share, options to purchase 75,000 shares of common stock at $1.50 per share and options to purchase 45,000 shares at $1.61.
3. Includes options to purchase 30,000 shares of common stock at $1.50 per share and options to purchase 45,000 shares at $1.61.
4. Includes 1,370 shares of common stock held by Muhammad Luqman, Ms. Luqman’s husband, options to purchase 117,106 shares of the commons stock at $1.50 per share and options to purchase 400,000 shares of the common stock at $1.61 per share.
5. Includes options to purchase 6,288 shares of the common stock at $1.50 per share, options to purchase 30,000 shares of the common stock at $1.50 per share, convertible debenture to purchase 19,597 common shares at $1.55 and warrant to purchase 9,799 common shares at $1.55 per share.
6. Includes options to purchase 17,986 shares of the common stock at $5.56 per share, 52,800 shares of common stock at $1.50 per share, 26,000 shares of common stock at $1.25 per share and convertible debenture to purchase 66,516 common shares at $1.55.
7. Includes options to purchase 10,120 shares of the common stock at $5.56 per share, options to purchase 75,000 shares of common stock at $1.50 per share and warrants to purchase shares 3,598 at $5.56.
8. Includes options to purchase 17,056 shares at $1.45.
9. Includes items 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 above.
Table of Contents 58

---

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS, RELATED TRANSACTIONS AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Amounts Due to Related Parties
We have amounts due to related parties with balances of $30,000 and $128,477 at December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively. A shareholder and former officer, Mihir Shah, made a $30,000 non-interest bearing, loan to the Company on December 31, 2020, which was repaid with common stock on January 28, 2021. The balance of $128,477 is due to the husband of the former CFO of the Company and was included in the Assumed Liabilities of the AHA Asset Purchase Agreement.
During the first quarter of 2019, the Chairman Warren Hosseinion made a $300,000 equity investment and was issued 21,590 warrants pursuant to the Equity Private Placement Memorandum.
During the first quarter of 2019, former Director Mark Fawcett made a $50,000 equity investment and was issued 3,598 warrants pursuant to the Equity Private Placement Memorandum.
BOARD INDEPENDENCE
The Company has elected to use the independence standards of the NASDAQ Listing Rules in its determination of whether the members of its Board are independent.
Accordingly, our Board of Directors has evaluated the independence of its members based upon the rules of NASDAQ and the SEC and the transactions referenced under “Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions” discussed above. Applying these standards, our Board of Directors determined that none of the directors who currently serve, other than Messrs. Hosseinion and Sternberg and Madame Luqman, have a relationship that would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director and that Messrs. Breslin, , Creem, Fawcett, Margolin, Meiri, Sim and Waters “independent” as that term is defined under NYSE Rule 407(a)(1). Messrs. Hosseinion, and Sternberg are not considered independent because they are officers of the Company. Our Board of Directors also determined that each non-employee director who serves as a member of the Audit, Compensation, and Nominating Committees satisfies the independence standards for such committee established by the SEC andNASDAQ, as applicable.
The Board has established an Audit Committee, a Compensation Committee and a Governance and Nominating Committee.
FAMILY RELATIONSHIPS
Mr. Barnett is Mr. Sternberg’s son. There are no other family relationships amongst any of the Company’s executive officers and directors.

---

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
The following table shows what Marcum LLP fees were for the audit and other services for the year ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively.
Year Ended Year Ended
12/31/ 2021 12/31/2020
Audit Fees $ 142,623 $ 55,000
Audit-Related Fees - -
All Tax Fees - -
Other Fees - -
Total $ 142,623 $ 55,000
Table of Contents 59
Audit Fees - This category includes the audit of the Company’s annual financial statements, review of financial statements included in the Company’s Form 10-Q Quarterly Reports and services that are normally provided by the independent auditors in connection with engagements for those years.
Audit-Related Fees - This category includes assurance and related services by the independent auditor that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of the Company’s financial statements and that are not reported under the caption “Audit Fees.”
Tax Fees - This category includes services rendered by the independent auditor for tax compliance, tax advice, and tax planning.
All Other Fees - This category includes products and services provided by the independent auditor other than the services reported under the captions “Audit Fees,” “Audit-Related Fees,” and “Tax Fees.”
Overview - The Company’s Audit Committee, reviews, and in its sole discretion pre-approves, our independent auditors’ annual engagement letter including proposed fees and all audit and non-audit services provided by the independent auditors. Accordingly, all services described under “Audit Fees,” “Audit-Related Fees,” “Tax Fees,” and “All Other Fees” were pre-approved by our Company’s Audit Committee. The Audit Committee may not engage the independent auditors to perform the non-audit services proscribed by law or regulation. The Company’s Audit Committee may delegate pre-approval authority to a member of the Board of Directors, and authority delegated in such manner must be reported at the next scheduled meeting of the Board of Directors.
Table of Contents 60
PART IV

---

ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
(a) Financial Statements
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (PCAOB ID Number 688)
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2021 and 2020
Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholder’s Equity for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020
Notes to Financial Statements
(b) Exhibits
Exhibit No. Description
3.1(i) Certificate of Incorporation, filed with the Delaware Secretary of State on April 13, 2000 (1)
3.1(ii) Certificate of Merger, filed with the Delaware Secretary of State on April 18, 2000 (1)
3.1(iii) Certificate of Amendment Changing Name, filed with the Delaware Secretary of State on December 19, 2000 (1)
3.1(iv) Certificate of Merger filed with the Delaware Secretary of State on February 17, 2006 (1)
3.1(v) Certificate of Amendment Changing Name filed with the Delaware Secretary of State on April 5, 2006 (1)
3.1(vi) Certificate of Amendment Increasing Authorized Shares filed with the Delaware Secretary of State on August 8, 2018 (3)
3.1(vii) Certificate of Merger filed with the Delaware Secretary of State on October 29, 2019 (7)
3.1(viii) Certificate of Merger filed with the Delaware Secretary of State on February 26, 2021. (AHA)(8)
3.1(ix) Certificate of Merger filed with the Delaware Secretary of State on February 26, 2021. (AHP) (8)
3.1(x) Certificate of Merger filed with the Delaware Secretary of State on February 26, 2021. (AHA Analytics) (8)
3.1(xi) Certificate of Merger filed with the California Secretary of State on October 1, 2021. (Procare Health Inc) (10)
3.2 Amended and Restated Bylaws (2)
3.3(i) Certificate of Designation of Series A Preferred Stock of iGambit, Inc. (4)
3.3(ii) Withdrawal of Certificate of Designation of Series A Preferred Stock of iGambit, Inc. (7)
4.1(i) Form of Stock Certificate (5)
4.1(ii) Note Purchase Agreement dated May 15, 2019.
4.1 (iii) Form of Convertible Promissory Note November 18, 2019(6)
4.1(iv) Form of Warrant November 18, 2019(6)
10.1 2019 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan (2)
10.2 Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of February 25, 2021 by and among the Registrant, AHP, Merger Sub, and the Signing Stockholder (8)
10.3 Master Services Agreement dated as of February 25, 2021 by and between AHA Management, Inc. and AHPIPA (8)
10.4 Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of February 25, 2021 by and among the Registrant, AHA, and Merger Sub (8)
10.5 Form of Intellectual Property Asset Purchase Agreement, dated as of May 27, 2020 by and among the Registrant, Clinigence Health, AHA, and AHA Analytics (9)
10.6 Form of Intellectual Property License Agreement, dated as of May 27, 2020 by and between Clinigence Health and AHA Analytics (9)
10.7 Form of Managed Services Agreement, dated as of May 27, 2020 by and between Clinigence Health and AHA Analytics (9)
10.8 2022 Equity Plan (11)
31.1 Certification of the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
31.2 Certification of the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.1 Certification of the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. (This exhibit shall not be deemed “filed” for the purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. Further, this exhibit shall not be deemed incorporated by reference into any other filing under the Security Act of 1933, as amended, or by the Security Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.)
32.2 Certification of the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. (This exhibit shall not be deemed “filed” for the purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. Further, this exhibit shall not be deemed incorporated by reference into any other filing under the Security Act of 1933, as amended, or by the Security Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.)
(1) Incorporated by reference to Form 10 filed on December 31, 2009.
(2) Incorporated by reference to Form Def 14(c) filed on October 7, 2019.
(3) Incorporated by reference to Form Def 14(c) filed on September 27, 2018.
(4) Incorporated by reference to current Form 8-K filed on August 6, 2018.
(5) Incorporated by reference to Amendment No. 1 to Form 10 filed on June 11, 2010.
(6) Incorporated by reference to current Form 8-K filed on November 22, 2019.
(7) Incorporated by reference to current Form 8-K filed on November 1, 2019.
(8) Incorporated by reference to current Form 8-K filed on March 2, 2021.
(9) Incorporated by reference to current Form 8-K filed on June 3, 2020.
(10) Incorporated by reference to current Form 8-K filed on October 22, 2021.
(11)
Incorporated by reference to definitive proxy statement of the Company’s board of directors that the Company filed with the SEC on February 14, 2022.
(12) We hereby agree to furnish the SEC with any omitted schedule or exhibit upon request.
Table of Contents 61