EDGAR 10-K Filing

Company CIK: 934549
Filing Year: 2025
Filename: 934549_10-K_2025_0000934549-25-000004.json

---

ITEM 1. BUSINESS
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
General
Acacia Research Corporation (the “Company,” “Acacia,” “we,” “us,” or “our”) is a disciplined value-oriented acquirer and operator of businesses across public and private markets and industries including but not limited to the industrial, energy and technology sectors. We acquire businesses with a view towards strong free cash flow generation and with an ability to scale where we can tap into our deep industry relationships, significant capital base, and transaction expertise to materially improve performance. We are focused on sourcing, execution, and improvement. We find unique situations, bring a flexible and creative approach to transacting, and relationships and expertise to drive continual improvement in operating performance. We approach transactions as business owners and operators rather than purely as financial investors and we believe it is our differentiator for creating long-term value for shareholders and partners. We define value through free cash flow generation, book value appreciation, and stock price growth. These are the pillars of the Acacia story.
Acacia creates value by building relationships and providing transaction expertise to create acquisition opportunities where we can meaningfully improve performance. We focus on identifying, pursuing, and acquiring businesses where we are uniquely positioned to deploy our differentiated strategy, people and processes to generate and compound shareholder value. We have a wide range of transactional and operational capabilities to realize the intrinsic value of the businesses that we acquire. Our ideal transactions include the acquisition of public or private companies, the acquisition of divisions of
other companies, or structured transactions that can result in the recapitalization or restructuring of the ownership of a business to enhance value.
We are particularly attracted to complex situations where we believe value is not fully recognized, the value of certain operations is masked by a diversified business mix, or where private ownership has not invested the capital and/or resources necessary to support long-term value. Through our public market activities, we aim to initiate strategic block positions in public companies as a path to complete whole company acquisitions or strategic transactions that unlock value. We believe this business model is differentiated from private equity funds, which do not typically own public securities prior to acquiring companies, hedge funds, which do not typically acquire entire businesses, and other acquisition vehicles such as special purpose acquisition companies, which are narrowly focused on completing one singular, defining acquisition.
We adhere closely to our philosophy of building strong and like-minded relationships with business leaders and, importantly, finding opportunities to make our return owning a business, rather through selling a business.
We run several different valuation models and metrics when we evaluate a business. One metric we rely heavily on is the durability and scalability of a target’s annual earnings stream, rather than its ‘exit year’ earnings, and the impact of these earnings on our income statement. Specifically, we underwrite to an acceptable range of unlevered and levered earnings yields, relative to the purchase price of the business and related equity required to fund the acquisition.
It is distinct from the ‘leveraged buyout model’ where the purchase price is heavily financed with a credit package, enabling small enhancements to earnings, and potential valuation multiple expansion, to generate returns. Both models work, as private equity has shown; however, in the private equity model the gains are heavily back weighted and thus carry a higher discount rate and incremental leverage risk. Our model, instead, targets similar returns without requiring an exit event for the business to generate those returns.
When we acquire a business at a ‘good multiple’, it means that we believe we are acquiring an attractive earnings stream relative to the price we paid to acquire that business, and that we believe there is an inherent valuation benefit relative to where similarly situated assets might trade in the market. We approach our acquisitions as long-term owners, though in our evaluation of capital allocation opportunities we may, from time to time, sell a business we own.
As part of our operating philosophy, we endeavor, through our strong network of operating partners, to enhance the values of businesses we acquire, driving both the ability to generate incremental earnings and potentially enhancing a company’s valuation multiple. Our focus is companies with total enterprise value of $1 billion or less, however, we may pursue larger acquisitions under the right circumstances. Broadly speaking, our potential acquisition targets are founder-owned or privately controlled businesses, entire public companies or carve-outs of specific segments, which show a path to consistent profitability, free cash flow generation, and higher risk-adjusted return expectations. We buy businesses to create platforms. We grow them organically and through M&A, with a clear focus on free cash flow generation and defined expectations on return on invested capital. Acacia then has the optionality to grow and reinvest free cash flow or look to monetize and build new platforms. The Company remains focused on acquiring and building businesses that have stable cash flow generation with an ability to scale, while retaining the flexibility to make opportunistic acquisitions with high risk-adjusted return characteristics.
We believe the Company has the potential to develop advantaged opportunities due to its:
•experienced management team, which has spearheaded robust book value per share growth, with compensation tied to this metric to ensure alignment with shareholders;
•disciplined focus on identifying opportunities where the Company can be an advantaged buyer, initiate a transaction opportunity spontaneously, avoid a traditional sale process and complete the purchase of a business, division or other asset at an attractive price;
•deep and experienced operating executive network which supports sourcing and evaluation of acquisition opportunities;
•significant resources and the flexibility to take advantage of uncertain environments and dislocated situations;
•willingness to invest across industries and in off-the-run, often misunderstood assets that suffer from a complexity discount;
•relationships and partnership abilities across functions and sectors; and
•strong expertise in corporate governance and operational transformation.
We regularly evaluate potential value-accretive opportunities to acquire new businesses, where our research, execution and operating partners can drive attractive earnings and book value per share growth. Our long-term focus positions our businesses to navigate economic cycles and allows sellers and other counterparties to have confidence that a transaction is not dependent on achieving the types of performance hurdles demanded by private equity sponsors. We consider opportunities based on the attractiveness of the underlying cash flows, without regard to a specific fund life or investment horizon.
People, Process and Performance
Our Company is built on the principles of People, Process and Performance. We have built a management team with demonstrated expertise in Research, Transactions and Execution, and Operations and Management of our targeted acquisitions. We believe our priorities and skills underpin a compelling value proposition for operating businesses, partners and future acquisition targets, including:
•the flexibility to consummate transactions using financing structures suited to the opportunity and involving third-party transaction structuring as needed;
•the ability to deliver ongoing financial and strategic support; and
•the financial capacity to maintain a long-term outlook and remain committed to a multi-year business plan.
Relationship with Starboard Value, LP
Our strategic relationship with Starboard Value, LP (together with certain funds and accounts affiliated with, or managed by, Starboard Value LP, “Starboard”), the Company’s controlling shareholder, expands our sourcing and operating network and resources; and enhances our access to operating partners and industry experts with whom we evaluate potential acquisition opportunities, which enhances the oversight and value creation of our businesses. Starboard provides ready access to its extensive network of industry executives and, as part of our relationship, Starboard has assisted, and we expect will continue to assist, with sourcing and evaluating appropriate acquisition opportunities.
Recapitalization
On October 30, 2022, the Company entered into a Recapitalization Agreement (the “Recapitalization Agreement”) with Starboard and certain funds and accounts affiliated with, or managed by, Starboard (collectively, the “Investors”), pursuant to which, among other things, the Company and Starboard agreed to enter into a series of transactions (the “Recapitalization”) to restructure Starboard’s investments in the Company in order to simplify the Company’s capital structure. Under the Recapitalization Agreement, the Company and Starboard agreed to take certain actions related to the Series A Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock in connection with the Recapitalization, including submitting a proposal for stockholder approval to remove the “4.89% blocker” provision contained in the Company’s Amended and Restated Certificate of Designations (the “Amendment to the Amended and Restated Certificate of Designations”). The Company’s stockholders approved the Amendment to the Amended and Restated Certificate of Designations at the Company’s annual meeting of stockholders held on May 16, 2023, which became effective on June 30, 2023.
Subsequently, and in accordance with the terms contained in the Second Amended and Restated Certificate of Designations and the Recapitalization Agreement, on July 13, 2023, Starboard converted an aggregate amount of 350,000 shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock of the Company, par value $0.001 per share (the “Series A Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock”) into 9,616,746 shares of common stock, which included 27,704 shares of common stock issued in respect of accrued and unpaid dividends (the “Preferred Stock Conversion”). Further to the terms of the Recapitalization Agreement and in accordance with the terms of the Company’s Series B Warrants (the “Series B Warrants”), on July 13, 2023, Starboard also exercised 31,506,849 of the Series B Warrants through a combination of a “Note Cancellation” and a “Limited Cash Exercise” (each as defined in the Series B Warrants), resulting in the receipt by Starboard of 31,506,849
shares of common stock (the “Series B Warrants Exercise” and, together with the Preferred Stock Conversion, the “Recapitalization Transactions”), the cancellation of $60.0 million aggregate principal amount of the Company’s senior secured notes held by Starboard (as described further in Note 12, the “Senior Secured Notes”) and the receipt by the Company of aggregate gross proceeds of approximately $55.0 million. No shares of Series A Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock, no Series B Warrants, nor any Senior Secured Notes remain outstanding. Refer to Note 12 to the consolidated financial statements for a detailed description of the Recapitalization and the Recapitalization Transactions.
Services Agreement
On December 12, 2023, the Company entered into a Services Agreement with Starboard (the “Services Agreement”), pursuant to which, upon the Company’s request, Starboard will provide to the Company certain trade execution, research, due diligence and other services. Starboard has agreed to provide the services on an expense reimbursement basis and no separate fee will be charged by Starboard for the services. Pursuant to the Services Agreement, the Company has agreed that Starboard (and certain of its affiliates) will not be liable to the Company for acts or omissions relating to the Services Agreement in the absence of bad faith, fraud, willful misconduct or gross negligence. The Company will also indemnify and advance expenses to Starboard (and certain of its affiliates) against any loss, cost or expense relating to third party claims in connection with the services or the Services Agreement. The Services Agreement provides (i) that certain work product developed by each of the Company and Starboard will be owned by the party that produced such work product and (ii) for mutual confidentiality obligations between the Company and Starboard for information disclosed pursuant to the Services Agreement. Either the Company or Starboard may terminate the Services Agreement at any time upon thirty days’ written notice. The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Audit Committee”), consisting of entirely of disinterested directors who are independent of Starboard, reviewed, directed the negotiation of the material terms of, and ultimately approved the Services Agreement prior to the Company’s execution thereof. The Audit Committee received, reviewed, and considered a number of factors prior to such approval, including, but not limited to, (i) the business purpose of the Services Agreement, (ii) whether comparable terms of the Services Agreement would be available to the Company in a transaction with an unrelated party and (iii) the benefits of the Services Agreement to the Company’s business and operations.
Core Corporate Development and Investment Approach
Going forward, we will continue to focus on creating transactions where we are able to acquire operating businesses and strategic assets that we believe are undervalued. Our expertise in, and experience with, complex situations enable us to discover and structure opportunities that are attractive for our shareholders and the leadership of the businesses we purchase. We utilize our capabilities across Research, Transactions and Execution, and Operations and Management to drive the discovery, investment, acquisition and integration of such target opportunities. We also retain the flexibility to make opportunistic acquisitions with higher risk-adjusted return characteristics and unlock value in long-hold, non-core or complex situations.
Research
We seek to identify companies, both public and private, at an appreciable discount to intrinsic value. We have a broad mandate, with a particular interest in businesses operating in the industrial, energy, and technology sectors.
Our team is focused on identifying acquisition opportunities across the public and private markets where we are positioned to generate enduring shareholder value. Overall, we believe our acquisition pipeline is robust and is a product of our public market research expertise, as well as our private market sourcing process.
The success of our strategy depends on our ability to properly identify acquisition candidates. Our research process focuses on, though is not limited to, the following considerations:
•completing substantial and detailed fundamental research, both internally and in conjunction with third parties;
•critically evaluating management teams;
•identifying and assessing financial and operational strengths and weaknesses absolutely and relative to industry competitors;
•researching and evaluating relevant industry information; and
•thoughtfully negotiating acquisition terms and conditions.
Transactions and Execution
Acacia is focused on the identification, acquisition and integration of both public and private companies. We are uniquely positioned to catalyze change with the support of our long-term capital base, depth of industry relationships and differentiated approach to transaction structuring.
Private Market Acquisitions
Acacia is focused on acquiring businesses across the private market landscape. We believe we are uniquely positioned to empower best-in-class operators as they seek to build enduring businesses within their vertical of focus. Partnering with Acacia represents an opportunity for business leaders, entrepreneurs and founders to grow their business without the constraints of a private equity fund.
Public Market Acquisitions
Acacia is focused on acquiring businesses across the public market landscape. We believe we are uniquely positioned to catalyze change within companies where we have developed, alongside our industry advisors, a differentiated view of the value creation opportunity within a given business. We evaluate public companies as currently constructed today, free of historical strategic decisions made with regard to the target in question. This approach empowers us to unlock value through, but not limited to, identifying opportunities for improved execution, identifying opportunities where the sum-of-the-parts may be greater than the whole, and acquiring non-core strategic assets.
Once we identify a favorable public market acquisition opportunity, we may purchase a strategic block of shares in the target company. From that point, the process of consummating a transaction or acquisition can be time-consuming and complex, taking months if not a year or longer to complete.
During that time, we will continue to leverage our management team’s experience and expertise in researching and valuing prospective target businesses, as well as negotiating the ultimate acquisition of such target businesses. We will also leverage the extensive networks of our operating partners, who are essential partners in identifying and executing acquisitions and supporting value creation.
Operations and Management
Our operational strategy involves identifying critical operating management either within the businesses or divisions we acquire or from our extensive executive network. We support the management teams of each of our acquired businesses by, among other things:
•financing internal growth strategies;
•supporting attractive external growth and acquisition opportunities;
•providing resources to assist management in controlling overhead costs and leveraging business-wide resources;
•implementing operational efficiencies; and
•sharing best practices across our portfolio companies.
Our Operations
Intellectual Property Operations - Patent Licensing, Enforcement and Technologies Business
We invest in intellectual property (“IP”) and engage in the licensing and enforcement of patented technologies, in each case through our wholly-owned subsidiary Acacia Research Group LLC and its wholly owned subsidiaries. Through our Patent Licensing, Enforcement and Technologies Business, we are a principal in the licensing and enforcement of patent portfolios, with our operating subsidiaries obtaining the rights in the patent portfolio or purchasing the patent portfolio outright.
On a consolidated basis, we currently own or control the rights to multiple patent portfolios, including U.S. patents and certain foreign counterparts, which cover technologies used in a variety of industries. We generate revenues and related cash flows from the granting of IP rights for the use of patented technologies that our operating subsidiaries control or own. While we partner from time to time with inventors and patent owners, ranging in size and including large corporations, we control and assume all responsibility in pursuing patent licensing and enforcement programs, and for the related operating expenses. When applicable, we share licensing revenue, net of costs, with our patent partners after we have achieved our agreed upon minimum return threshold. We may also provide upfront capital to patent owners as an advance against future licensing revenue.
We did not acquire any new patent portfolios in calendar years 2024, 2023 and 2022. During 2021, we acquired one new patent portfolio consisting of Wi-Fi 6 standard essential patents. In 2020, we acquired five new patent portfolios consisting of (i) flash memory technology, (ii) voice activation and control technology, (iii) wireless networks, (iv) internet search, advertising and cloud computing technology and (v) GPS navigation. The patents and patent rights acquired in 2021 and 2020 have estimated economic useful lives of approximately five years.
We have established a proven track record of licensing and enforcement success with over 1,600 license agreements executed as of December 31, 2024, across nearly 200 patent portfolio licensing and enforcement programs. As of December 31, 2024, we have generated gross licensing revenue of approximately $1.9 billion, and have returned $881.0 million to our patent partners. During the past five calendar years ending on December 31, 2024, we generated gross licensing revenue of approximately $234.0 million and returned approximately $91.2 million to our patent partners.
As attractive opportunities become available, we remain open to opportunistically deploying additional capital into the IP business in the future, consistent with our mission to maximize value for shareholders. Our team is made up of well-respected leaders in the IP space, and intellectual property owners actively seek us out as a partner.
Refer to Item 7. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” for additional information concerning our Patent Licensing, Enforcement and Technologies business.
Energy Operations Business
Our Energy Operations Business consists of the Company’s approximately 73.5% interest in Benchmark Energy II, LLC (“Benchmark”). Headquartered in Austin, Texas, Benchmark is an independent oil and gas company focused on the acquisition, production and development of operated and non-operated oil and natural gas assets in Texas and Oklahoma. Benchmark is run by an experienced management team led by Chief Executive Officer Kirk Goehring and seeks to acquire predictable and shallow decline, cash-flowing oil and gas properties whose value can be enhanced via a disciplined, field optimization strategy, with risk managed through robust commodity hedges and low leverage. Through its investment in Benchmark, the Company, along with the Benchmark management team, will evaluate future growth and acquisitions of oil and gas assets at attractive valuations.
Benchmark’s current position is concentrated in the Anadarko Basin region of Western Oklahoma and the Texas panhandle. As of December 31, 2024, Benchmark’s operated assets consisted of 551 gross (472 net) operated wells, and its non-operated assets consisted of an average working interest of 13% in 64 gross (8 net) productive wells including the assets acquired in the Revolution Transaction (as defined below). Production from Benchmark’s operated and non-operated wells during the year ended December 31, 2024 totaled 1,680 Mboe, or an average of 4.6 Mboe per day.
Acquisitions
On November 13, 2023, we invested $10.0 million to acquire a 50.4% equity interest in Benchmark. Prior to Benchmark’s acquisition of the Revolution assets in April 2024, Benchmark’s assets consisted of over 13,000 net acres primarily located in Roberts and Hemphill Counties in Texas, and an interest in over 135 gross (89 net) wells, the majority of which are operated.
On April 17, 2024, Benchmark consummated the transaction contemplated in the Purchase and Sale Agreement (the “Revolution Purchase Agreement”), dated February 16, 2024, by and among Benchmark and Revolution Resources II, LLC, Revolution II NPI Holding Company, LLC, Jones Energy, LLC, Nosley Assets, LLC, Nosley Acquisition, LLC, and Nosley Midstream, LLC (collectively, “Revolution”). Pursuant to the Revolution Purchase Agreement, Benchmark acquired certain upstream assets and related facilities in Texas and Oklahoma, including approximately 140,000 net acres and an interest in approximately 528 gross (423 net) operated and non-operated wells (such purchase and sale, together
with the other transactions contemplated by the Revolution Purchase Agreement, the “Revolution Transaction”) for a purchase price of $145 million in cash (the “Revolution Purchase Price”), subject to customary post-closing adjustments.
The Company’s contribution to Benchmark to fund its portion of the Revolution Purchase Price and related fee was $59.9 million, which was funded from cash on hand. The remainder of the Revolution Purchase Price was funded by a combination of borrowings under the Benchmark Revolving Credit Facility (as defined in Note 11 to the consolidated financial statements contained elsewhere herein) and a cash contribution of $15.25 million from other investors in Benchmark, including McArron Partners. Following closing of the Revolution Transaction, the Company’s interest in Benchmark is approximately 73.5%.
Development
In connection with our investment in Benchmark in November 2023 and Benchmark’s subsequent acquisition of the Revolutions assets in 2024, we commenced an evaluation of the development potential of Benchmark’s undrilled assets. Benchmark had not adopted a long-term development plan as of December 31, 2024 or 2023 and, in accordance with SEC rules, its undrilled assets could not be classified as having proved undeveloped reserves for such periods. As a result, Benchmark’s estimated net proved reserves at December 31, 2024 and 2023 consist entirely of proved developed reserves.
With respect to its non-operated assets, Benchmark engages in oil and natural gas development by participating on a proportionate basis alongside third-party interests in wells drilled and completed in spacing units that include its acreage. Benchmark relies on the operator of its non-operated assets to propose, permit and initiate the drilling and completion of wells. The Company and Benchmark assess each drilling and completion opportunity on a case-by-case basis and participate in wells that are expected to meet a desired rate of return based upon estimates of recoverable oil and natural gas reserves, anticipated oil and natural gas prices, the expertise of the operator, and the anticipated completed well cost from each project, as well as other factors.
Marketing and Customers
Benchmark generally utilizes external third-party marketing agencies to manage its commodities marketing activities for its operated production, and relies on its operating partners to market and sell oil and natural gas produced from wells in which it has a non-operated interest. In connection with such activities, its operators coordinate the transportation of its oil and natural gas production from its wells to appropriate pipelines pursuant to arrangements that they negotiate and maintain with various parties purchasing the production. We understand that Benchmark’s operating partners generally sell its production to a variety of purchasers at prevailing market prices under separately negotiated contracts. The price at which Benchmark’s production is sold is generally tied to the spot market for oil or natural gas. The price at which Benchmark’s oil production is sold typically reflects a discount to the WTI benchmark price. This differential primarily represents the transportation costs in moving the oil from wellhead to refinery and will fluctuate based on availability of pipeline, rail and other transportation methods. The price at which our natural gas production is sold may reflect either a discount or premium to the NYMEX benchmark price.
Seasonality
Generally, but not always, the demand and price levels for natural gas increase during winter and decrease during summer. To lessen seasonal demand fluctuations, pipelines, utilities, local distribution companies and industrial users utilize natural gas storage facilities and forward purchase some of their anticipated winter requirements during the summer. However, increased summertime demand for electricity can place increased demand on storage volumes. Demand for oil and heating oil is also generally higher in the winter and the summer driving season, although oil prices are affected more significantly by global supply and demand. Seasonal anomalies, such as mild winters, sometimes lessen these fluctuations. Certain of our drilling, completion and other operations are also subject to seasonal limitations where equipment may not be available during periods of peak demand or where weather conditions and events result in delayed operations. See “Risk Factors-Risks Related to our Operations-Currently, our Energy Operations Business is concentrated in the Anadarko basin, making it vulnerable to risks associated with operating in a limited number of geographic areas.”
Refer to Item 2. “Properties” and Item 7. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” for additional information about our Energy Operations.
Industrial Operations Business
In October 2021, we acquired Printronix Holding Corp. (“Printronix”). Printronix is a leading manufacturer and distributor of industrial impact printers, also known as line matrix printers, and related consumables and services. Printers consist of hardware and embedded software and may be sold with maintenance service agreements, which are serviced by outside contractors. Printronix’s line matrix printers are used for mission critical applications within these industries, including labeling and inventory management, build sheets, invoicing, manifests and bills of lading, and reporting. In China, India and other developing countries in Asia and Africa, our printers are also prevalent in the banking and government sectors. Printronix has manufacturing, configuration and/or distribution sites located in Malaysia, the United States, Singapore, China and the Netherlands, along with sales and support locations around the world to support its global network of users, channel partners, and strategic alliances. Consumable products include inked ribbons which are used within Printronix’s printers. Printronix’s products are primarily sold through Printronix’s global network of channel partners, such as dealers and distributors, to end-users. This acquisition was made at what we believe to be an attractive purchase price, and we are now supporting existing management in its execution of strategic partnerships to generate growth.
We are supporting Printronix as it transitions its business mix from lower-margin printer sales to higher-margin consumable products including ink cartridges and specialty ribbons. Printronix’s dual hardware and consumables business model, combined with a streamlined operating structure, represents a steady source of cash flow for Acacia. The Printronix team is focused on topline initiatives and reducing G&A, and we expect Printronix to continue to generate free cash flow on an annual basis.
Refer to Item 7. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” for additional Industrial Operations information.
Manufacturing Operations Business
On October 18, 2024, Deflecto Holdco LLC (“Deflecto Purchaser”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Acacia, acquired Deflecto Acquisition, Inc. (“Deflecto”), pursuant to that certain Stock Purchase Agreement (the “Deflecto Stock Purchase Agreement”) entered into on the same day with Deflecto Holdings, LLC and Evriholder Finance LLC (collectively, the “Deflecto Sellers”), Deflecto and the Sellers’ Representative named therein. Pursuant to the Deflecto Stock Purchase Agreement, Deflecto Purchaser purchased all of the issued and outstanding equity interests of Deflecto, upon the terms and subject to the conditions of the Deflecto Stock Purchase Agreement (such purchase and sale, together with the other transactions contemplated by the Deflecto Stock Purchase Agreement, the “Deflecto Transaction”). Headquartered in Indianapolis, Indiana, Deflecto is a leading specialty manufacturer of essential products serving the commercial transportation, HVAC, and office markets. The Deflecto Transaction closed simultaneously with the execution of the Deflecto Stock Purchase Agreement on October 18, 2024. Under the terms and conditions of the Deflecto Stock Purchase Agreement, the aggregate consideration paid to the Deflecto Sellers in the Deflecto Transaction consisted of $103.7 million, subject to certain working capital, debt and other customary adjustments set forth in the Deflecto Stock Purchase Agreement (the “Deflecto Purchase Price”). The Deflecto Purchase Price was funded with a combination of borrowings of a $48.0 million secured term loan (the “Deflecto Term Loan”) and cash on hand. A portion of the Deflecto Purchase Price is being held in escrow to indemnify Deflecto Purchaser against certain claims, losses and liabilities. The Company’s consolidated financial statements include Deflecto’s consolidated operations from October 18, 2024 through December 31, 2024. Refer to Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements elsewhere herein for additional information.
Refer to Item 7. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” for additional Manufacturing Operations information.
Life Sciences Portfolio
In June 2020 we acquired a portfolio of investments in 18 public and private life sciences companies (the “Life Sciences Portfolio”). That purchase was funded with a combination of available cash and capital from Starboard, for a total of approximately $282.0 million at the time of acquisition. Through the end of December 31, 2024, we have received proceeds of $564.1 million as we monetized the Life Sciences portfolio. We retained an investment in the Life Sciences Portfolio consisting of public and private securities valued at $25.7 million at December 31, 2024. On January 19, 2024, we completed the sale of our 33,023,210 shares of Arix Bioscience PLC (“Arix”) to RTW Biotech Opportunities Operating Ltd, a subsidiary of RTW Biotech Opportunities Ltd, for $57.1 million in aggregate (representing £1.43 per share at an exchange rate of 1.2087 USD/GBP). Following the completion of the share sale, we no longer own any shares of Arix. Additionally, some of the businesses in which we continue to hold an interest generate income through the receipt of
royalties and milestone payments. Refer to Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements elsewhere herein for more information
Competition
We face intense competition in identifying, evaluating and executing strategic acquisitions from other entities with similar business objectives, including private equity groups and operating businesses seeking strategic acquisitions. We compete with financial firms, corporate buyers and others looking to invest in strategic opportunities. These competitors may have greater financial and human capital resources than we have.
Additionally, our Patent Licensing, Enforcement and Technologies Business faces intense competition in identifying, evaluating and executing strategic acquisitions from other entities with similar business objectives. We compete with financial firms, corporate buyers and others investing in strategic opportunities and acquiring IP. Additionally, universities and other technology sources compete with us as they seek to develop and commercialize technologies and may receive financing for basic research in exchange for the exclusive right to commercialize resulting inventions. These competitors may have greater financial and human capital resources than we have. We may find more companies entering the market for similar technology opportunities, which may reduce our market share in one or more technology industries that we currently or in the future may rely upon to generate future revenue.
Our Energy Operations Business faces intense competition in identifying, evaluating, and executing attractive oil and gas asset acquisitions from other entities with similar business objectives, including major and independent oil and natural gas companies and private equity groups. Our Energy Operations Business also competes for drilling rigs and other equipment and labor required to drill, complete, operate and develop its properties. Competitors in the Energy Operations sector may have substantially greater financial resources, staff, facilities and other resources. In addition, larger competitors may be able to absorb the burden of any changes in federal, state and local laws and regulations more easily than our Energy Operations Business, which could adversely affect its competitive position. These competitors may be willing and able to pay more for drilling rigs, leasehold and mineral acreage and productive oil and natural gas properties and may be able to identify, evaluate, bid for and purchase a greater number of properties and prospects than our Energy Operations Business can. The oil and natural gas industry also competes with other energy-related industries in supplying the energy and fuel requirements of industrial, commercial and individual consumers.
Information Security
We are highly dependent on information and operation technology networks and systems to securely process, transmit and store electronic information. Cyberattacks on such systems continue to grow in frequency, complexity and sophistication. These attacks can create system disruptions, shutdowns or unauthorized disclosure of confidential information, including non-public personal information, consumer data and proprietary business information.
We remain focused on making strategic investments in information security to protect information and operation technology systems of our operating subsidiaries and unconsolidated affiliates. This includes both capital expenditures and operating expenses on hardware, software, personnel and consulting services. As the primary products and services of our operating subsidiaries and unconsolidated affiliates evolve, we apply a comprehensive approach to the mitigation of identified security risks. We have established risk management policies, including those related to information security and cybersecurity, designed to monitor and mitigate such risks.
Title to Oil and Natural Gas Properties
It is customary in the oil and natural gas industry to make only a preliminary review of title to undeveloped oil and natural gas leases at the time they are acquired and to obtain more extensive title examinations when preparing to develop the undeveloped leases and when acquiring producing properties. In future acquisitions, our Energy Operations Business will conduct title examinations on material portions of such properties in a manner generally consistent with industry practice. Certain of our Energy Operations Business oil and natural gas properties may be subject to certain imperfections in title, encumbrances, easements, servitudes or other restrictions, none of which, in management’s opinion, will in the aggregate materially restrict its operations.
Regulation - Environment, Health and Safety
Regulation of Oil and Natural Gas Exploration and Production
Exploration and production operations are subject to various types of regulation at the federal, state and local levels. These regulations include requiring permits to drill wells, maintaining bonding requirements to drill or operate wells, regulating the location of wells, the method of drilling and casing wells, the surface use and restoration of properties on which wells are drilled and the plugging and abandoning of wells. Our operations are also subject to various conservation laws and regulations. These include the regulation of the size of drilling and spacing units or proration units, the density of wells that may be drilled and the unitization or pooling of oil and gas properties. Some states allow the forced pooling or integration of tracts to facilitate exploration while other states rely on voluntary pooling of lands and leases. In addition, state conservation laws establish maximum rates of production from oil and natural gas wells, generally prohibit the venting or flaring of natural gas and impose certain requirements regarding the ratability of production. The laws and regulations limit the amounts of oil and natural gas we can produce from our wells as well as the number of wells, and the locations where, we can drill. Because these laws and regulations are often amended, expanded and reinterpreted, we are unable to predict the future cost or impact of regulatory compliance. The regulatory burden on the oil and gas industry often increases the cost of doing business and, consequently, affects our profitability. These laws and regulations, however, do not affect us differently than others in the industry.
Regulation of Natural Gas Marketing, Gathering and Transportation
Federal legislation and regulatory controls have historically affected the price of the natural gas we produce and the manner in which our production is transported and marketed. Under the U.S. Natural Gas Act of 1938 (the “NGA”), the U.S. Natural Gas Policy Act of 1978 (the “NGPA”) and the regulations promulgated under those statutes, the U.S. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (the “FERC”) regulates the interstate sale for resale of natural gas and the transportation of natural gas in interstate commerce, although facilities used in the production or gathering of natural gas in interstate commerce are generally exempted from FERC jurisdiction. However, natural gas prices for all “first sales” of natural gas, which definition covers all sales of our own production, are not subject to price regulation. In addition, the FERC granted to all producers such as us a “blanket certificate of public convenience and necessity” authorizing the sale of natural gas for resale without further FERC approvals. As a result of this policy, all of our produced natural gas is sold at market prices, subject to the terms of any private contracts that may be in effect. Under the provisions of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (“2005 Act”), the NGA was amended to prohibit any forms of market manipulation in connection with the purchase or sale of natural gas. Pursuant to the 2005 Act, the FERC established regulations intended to increase natural gas pricing transparency by, among other things, requiring market participants to report their gas sales transactions annually to the FERC. The 2005 Act also significantly increased the penalties for violations of the NGA and NGPA and the FERC’s regulations. The current maximum penalty is approximately $1.6 million per day per violation.
Under the NGPA, natural gas gathering facilities are expressly exempt from FERC jurisdiction. What constitutes “gathering” under the NGPA has evolved through FERC decisions and judicial review of such decisions. We believe that our gathering and production facilities meet the test for non-jurisdictional “gathering” systems under the NGPA and that our facilities are not subject to federal regulations. Although exempt from FERC oversight, our natural gas gathering systems and services may receive regulatory scrutiny by state and federal agencies regarding the safety and operating aspects of the transportation and storage activities of these facilities.
Our natural gas sales prices continue to be affected by intrastate and interstate gas transportation regulation because the cost of transporting the natural gas once sold to the consuming market is a factor in the prices we receive. The rates and terms for access to natural gas pipeline transportation services are subject to extensive regulation. The FERC’s regulations require, among other things, that interstate natural gas pipelines provide firm and interruptible transportation service on an unbundled, open access, and non-discriminatory basis, provide internet access to current information about available pipeline capacity and other relevant information, and permit pipeline shippers under certain circumstances to release contracted transportation and storage capacity to other shippers, thereby creating secondary markets for such services. The rates for such transportation and storage services are subject to the FERC’s ratemaking authority, and the FERC exercises its authority by applying cost-of-service principles to limit the maximum and minimum levels of tariff-based recourse rates. However, it also allows for the negotiated rates as an alternative to cost-based rates and may grant market-based rates in certain circumstances, typically with respect to storage services. The FERC regulations also restrict interstate natural gas pipelines from sharing transportation or customer information with marketing affiliates and require that the transmission function personnel of interstate natural gas pipelines operate independently of the marketing function personnel of the pipeline or its affiliates. We cannot predict what new or different regulations the FERC and other regulatory agencies may adopt, or what effect subsequent regulations may have on our activities. Similarly, we cannot predict what proposals, if any, that affect the oil and natural gas industry might actually be enacted by the U.S. Congress or the various state legislatures and what effect, if any, such proposals might have on us. Further, we cannot predict whether the recent trend
toward federal deregulation of the natural gas industry will continue or what effect future policies will have on our sale of gas.
Federal Regulation of Swap Transactions
Our Energy Operations Business uses derivative financial instruments such as collar, swap and basis swap agreements to attempt to manage price risk due to the impact of changes in commodity prices on its operating results and cash flows. The Commodity Exchange Act provides the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (the “CFTC”) with jurisdiction to regulate the over-the-counter (“OTC”) derivatives market (which includes the sorts of financial instruments used by our Energy Operations Business) and participants in that market. We endeavor to ensure that Benchmark’s OTC derivatives transactions comply with applicable CFTC regulations. Although the CFTC does not currently require the clearing of OTC commodity derivatives transactions of the types that Benchmark uses, we believe that Benchmark’s use of swaps to hedge against changes in commodity prices qualifies it as a commercial end-user, which would exempt it from a future requirements to centrally clear its commodity swaps. Nevertheless, future changes in CFTC regulations could increase the cost of entering into derivative contracts, limit the availability of derivatives to protect against risks that Benchmark encounters, reduce Benchmark’s ability to monetize or restructure our existing derivative contracts and increase Benchmark’s exposure to less creditworthy counterparties. If Benchmark reduces its use of swaps, results of operations of our Energy Operations Business may become more volatile and its cash flows may be less predictable.
Federal Regulation of Petroleum
Sales of crude oil and NGLs are not regulated and are made at market prices. However, the price received from the sale of these products is affected by the cost of transporting the products to market. Much of that transportation is through interstate common carrier pipelines, which are regulated by the FERC under the Interstate Commerce Act (“ICA”). The FERC requires that pipelines regulated under the ICA file tariffs setting forth the rates and terms and conditions of service and that such service not be unduly discriminatory or preferential.
The FERC’s regulations provide for an indexing system for ICA-regulated rates by which the carrier makes annual adjustments based on the rate of inflation, subject to maximum ceiling and other conditions and limitations. These adjustments may increase or decrease the cost of transporting crude oil and NGLs by interstate pipeline. In 2020, the FERC established the new adder for calculating the ceiling for crude oil and liquids pipeline rates subject to indexing, establishing an index level of Producer Price Index for Finished Goods plus 0.78 percent for the five-year period commencing July 1, 2021. On rehearing, the FERC subsequently reduced the adder to minus 0.21 percent, but this action was vacated on appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals
Environmental and Safety Regulations
General. We are subject to extensive and stringent federal, state and local laws and regulations governing the protection of the environment. These laws and regulations can change, restrict or otherwise impact our operations, including our Energy Operations, in many ways, including the handling or disposal of waste material, planning for future activities to avoid or mitigate harm to threatened or endangered species, and requiring the installation and operation of emissions or pollution control equipment. Existing environmental laws and regulations could be revised or reinterpreted, including by the Trump administration, which introduces further uncertainty as to our compliance obligations. The overturning of the Chevron doctrine on June 28, 2024 by the U.S. Supreme Court, which had provided for deference in certain cases to the relevant federal agency with regard to the interpretation of federal regulations, has introduced additional uncertainty going forward regarding existing and future federal regulations. Failure to comply with these laws and regulations could result in the assessment of administrative, civil and criminal penalties, the imposition of remedial requirements and the issuance of orders enjoining future operations. Permits are required for the operation of our various facilities. These permits can be revoked, modified or renewed by issuing authorities. Governmental authorities enforce compliance with their regulations through fines, injunctions or both. Regulations can increase the cost of planning, designing, installing and operating, and can affect the timing of installing and operating, oil and natural gas facilities. Although we believe that compliance with environmental regulations will not have a material adverse effect on us, risks of substantial costs and liabilities and potential suspension or cessation of operations under certain conditions related to environmental considerations or compliance issues are part of oil and natural gas production operations. We can provide no assurance that we will not incur significant costs and liabilities. Also, it is possible that other developments, such as stricter environmental laws and regulations and claims for damages to property or persons resulting from oil and natural gas production could result in substantial costs and liabilities to us.
Solid and Hazardous Waste. Benchmark currently owns or leases, and has in the past owned or leased, numerous properties that were used for the production of oil and natural gas for many years. Although operating and disposal practices that were standard in the industry at the time may have been utilized, it is possible that hydrocarbons or other wastes may have been disposed of or released on or under the properties currently owned or leased by Benchmark. State and federal laws applicable to oil and gas wastes and properties have become stricter over time. Under these increasingly stringent requirements, Benchmark could be required to remove or remediate previously disposed wastes (including wastes disposed or released by prior owners and operators), clean up contamination (including groundwater contamination by prior owners or operators) or perform plugging operations to prevent future contamination.
Benchmark generates some wastes that are hazardous wastes subject to the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (the “RCRA”) and comparable state statutes, as well as wastes that are exempt from such regulation. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (the “EPA”) limits the disposal options for certain hazardous wastes. It is possible that certain wastes currently exempt from regulation as hazardous wastes may in the future be designated as hazardous wastes under RCRA or other applicable statutes. In the future, our Energy Operations Business could be subject to more rigorous and costly disposal requirements than we encounter today.
Superfund. The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (“CERCLA”), also known as the “Superfund” law, and comparable state laws and regulations impose liability, without regard to fault or the legality of the original conduct, on certain persons with respect to the release of hazardous substances into the environment. These persons include the current and past owners and operators of a site where the release occurred and any party that treated or disposed of or arranged for the treatment or disposal of hazardous substances found at a site. Under CERCLA, such persons may be subject to joint and several strict liability for the costs of cleaning up the hazardous substances that have been released into the environment, for damages to natural resources and for the costs of certain health studies. CERCLA also authorizes the EPA, and in some cases, private parties, to undertake actions to clean up such hazardous substances, or to recover the costs of such actions from the responsible parties. In addition, it is not uncommon for neighboring landowners and other third parties to file claims for personal injury and property damage allegedly caused by the hazardous substances released into the environment. In the course of business, Benchmark has used materials and generated wastes and will continue to use materials and generate wastes that may fall within CERCLA’s hazardous substances definition. Benchmark may also be an owner or operator of sites on which hazardous substances have been released. As a result, Benchmark may be responsible under CERCLA for all or part of the costs to clean up sites where such substances have been released.
Oil Pollution Act. The Oil Pollution Act of 1990 (the “OPA”) and implementing regulations impose a variety of obligations on responsible parties related to the prevention of oil spills and liability for damages resulting from such spills in waters of the U.S. The term “waters of the U.S.” has been broadly defined to include some inland water bodies, including wetlands and intermittent streams. The OPA assigns joint and several strict liability to each responsible party for oil removal costs and a variety of public and private damages. The OPA also imposes ongoing requirements on operators, including the preparation of oil spill response plans and proof of financial responsibility to cover environmental cleanup and restoration costs that could be incurred in connection with an oil spill. We believe that we are in substantial compliance with the OPA and related federal regulations to the extent applicable to our operations.
Endangered Species Act. The Endangered Species Act (the “ESA”) was established to protect endangered and threatened species. Pursuant to the ESA, if a species is listed as threatened or endangered, restrictions may be imposed on activities adversely affecting that species’ habitat. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (the “FWS”) may designate critical habitat and suitable habitat areas it believes are necessary for survival of a threatened or endangered species. A critical habitat or suitable habitat designation could result in further material restrictions to federal land use and may materially delay or prohibit land access for oil and gas development. Similar protections are offered to migratory birds under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act, to bald and golden eagles under the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act, and to certain species under state law. We conduct operations in areas where certain species are currently listed as threatened or endangered, or could be listed as such, under the ESA. Operations in areas where threatened or endangered species or their habitat are known to exist may require us to incur increased costs to implement mitigation or protective measures and also may restrict or preclude our drilling activities in those areas or during certain seasons, such as breeding and nesting seasons.
New listing petitions continue to be filed with the FWS which could impact our Energy Operations Business. Many non-governmental organizations (“NGOs”) work closely with the FWS regarding the listing of many species, including species with broad and even nationwide ranges. The increase in endangered species listings may limit our ability to explore for or produce oil and gas in certain areas or cause us to incur additional costs.
Clean Water Act. The Federal Water Pollution Control Act (the “Clean Water Act”) and implementing regulations, which are primarily executed through a system of permits, also govern the discharge of certain pollutants into waters of the U.S. Sanctions for failure to comply strictly with the Clean Water Act are generally resolved by payment of fines and correction of any identified deficiencies. However, regulatory agencies could require us to cease construction or operation of certain facilities or to cease hauling wastewater to facilities owned by others that are the source of water discharges to resolve non-compliance. We believe that we substantially comply with the applicable provisions of the Clean Water Act and related federal and state regulations.
Clean Air Act. Our operations are subject to the federal Clean Air Act (the “Clean Air Act”) and comparable local and state laws and regulations to control emissions from sources of air pollution. Federal and state laws require new and modified sources of air pollutants to obtain permits prior to commencing construction. Major sources of air pollutants are subject to more stringent, federally imposed requirements including additional permitting requirements. Federal and state laws designed to control toxic air pollutants and greenhouse gases might require installation of additional controls. Payment of fines and correction of any identified deficiencies generally resolve any failures to comply strictly with air regulations or permits. However, in the event of non-compliance, regulatory agencies could also require us to cease construction or operation of certain facilities or to install additional controls on certain facilities that are air emission sources. We believe that we substantially comply with applicable emission standards and permitting requirements under local, state and federal laws and regulations.
Some of our producing wells and associated facilities are subject to restrictive air emission limitations and permitting requirements, which have added costs and caused delays in operations. For additional information, please read “Risk Factors-Risks related to our Energy Operations Business and Industry” in Item 1A.
If we are unable to comply with air pollution regulations or to obtain permits for emissions associated with our operations, we could be required to forego or implement modifications to certain operations. These regulations may also increase compliance costs for some facilities we own or operate, and result in administrative, civil or criminal penalties for noncompliance. Obtaining permits may delay the development of our oil and natural gas projects, including the construction and operation of facilities.
Safe Drinking Water Act. The Safe Drinking Water Act (“SDWA”) and comparable local and state provisions restrict the disposal, treatment or release of water produced or used during oil and natural gas development. Subsurface placement of fluids (including disposal wells or enhanced oil recovery) is governed by federal or state regulatory authorities that, in some cases, includes the state’s oil and gas regulatory authority or the state’s environmental authority. These regulations may increase the costs of compliance for some facilities.
Hydraulic Fracturing. Substantially all of our exploration and production operations depend on the use of hydraulic fracturing to enhance production from oil and natural gas wells. Most of our wells would not be economical without the use of hydraulic fracturing to stimulate production from the well. Due to concerns raised relating to potential impacts of hydraulic fracturing on groundwater quality, legislative and regulatory efforts at the U.S. federal, state and local levels have been initiated to render permitting and compliance requirements more stringent for hydraulic fracturing or to restrict or prohibit the activity altogether. States in which we operate also have adopted, or have stated intentions to adopt, laws or regulations that mandate further restrictions on hydraulic fracturing, such as imposing more stringent permitting, disclosure and well-construction requirements on hydraulic fracturing operations and establishing standards for the capture of air emissions released during hydraulic fracturing. In addition to state measures, local land use restrictions, such as city ordinances, may restrict drilling in general or hydraulic fracturing in particular. Increased regulation and attention given to the hydraulic fracturing process could lead to greater opposition to oil and natural gas production activities using hydraulic fracturing techniques, which could have an adverse effect on oil and natural gas production activities, including operational delays or increased operating costs in the production of oil and natural gas, or could make it more difficult to perform hydraulic fracturing.
At the federal level, the EPA conducted a study of the potential environmental effects of hydraulic fracturing on drinking water and groundwater, and concluded that hydraulic fracturing activities can impact drinking water resources under some circumstances, including large volume spills and inadequate mechanical integrity of wells. This study and other studies that may be undertaken by the EPA or other federal agencies could spur initiatives to further regulate hydraulic fracturing under the Safe Drinking Water Act, the Toxic Substances Control Act, or other statutory and regulatory mechanisms. A number of federal agencies are analyzing, or have been requested to review, a variety of environmental issues associated with hydraulic fracturing practices.
Our inability to locate sufficient amounts of water, or to dispose of or recycle water used or produced in our exploration and production operations, could adversely impact our operations. For water sourcing, we first seek to use non-potable water supplies, or recycled produced water for our operational needs. In certain areas, there may be insufficient water available for drilling and completion activities. Water must then be obtained from other sources and transported to the drilling site. Our operations in certain areas could be adversely impacted if we are unable to secure sufficient amounts of water or to dispose of or recycle the water used in our operations. The imposition of new environmental and other regulations, as well as produced water disposal well limits or moratoriums in areas of seismicity, could further restrict our ability to conduct operations such as hydraulic fracturing by restricting the disposal of waste such as produced water and drilling fluids. Compliance with environmental regulations and permit requirements governing the withdrawal, storage and use of surface water or groundwater necessary for hydraulic fracturing of wells may increase our operating costs and cause delays, interruptions or termination of our operations, the extent of which cannot be predicted, all of which could have an adverse effect on our operations and financial condition. Operators, including us, have begun to rely more on recycling of water that flows back from the wellbore following hydraulic fracturing (“flowback water”) and produced water from well sites as a preferred alternative to disposal.
Greenhouse Gas and Climate Change Laws and Regulations. In response to studies suggesting that emissions of carbon dioxide and certain other greenhouse gas (“GHG”), including methane, may be contributing to global climate change, there is increasing focus by local, state, regional, national and international regulatory bodies as well as by investors and the public on GHG emissions and climate change issues. We closely follow developments in this area, including changes in the regulatory landscape in the U.S. at the federal, state, and local levels. We cannot predict, however, how or when such changes may be implemented or ultimately impact our business. U.S. presidents have the power to issue executive orders that can have the effect of the enactment of new laws. The Trump Administration has issued a series of executive orders that signal a shift in the United States’ energy and climate change policies from the prior administration. Future administrations may, however, pursue executive orders similar to, or more restrictive than, current and prior administrations.
At the federal level, the EPA regulates carbon dioxide, methane and other GHGs under existing provisions of the Clean Air Act. In December 2009, the EPA published its findings that emissions of GHGs present an endangerment to public health and the environment because emissions of such gases are contributing to the warming of the earth’s atmosphere and other climatic changes. Based on these findings, the EPA adopted regulations under existing provisions of the federal Clean Air Act that establish Prevention of Significant Deterioration (“PSD”) and Title V permit reviews for GHG emissions from certain large stationary sources that are otherwise subject to PSD and Title V permitting requirements. The EPA has also adopted rules requiring the monitoring and reporting of GHG emissions from specified sources in the U.S., including, among others, certain oil and gas production facilities on an annual basis, which includes certain of our operations. In 2024, the EPA published final rules imposing new, stricter requirements for methane monitoring, reporting, and emissions control at certain oil and natural gas facilities, as well as a final rule implementing a charge on large emitters of waste methane from the oil and gas sector. In January 2025, however, President Trump signed a series of executive orders that call upon the EPA to submit a report on the continuing applicability of its endangerment finding for GHGs under the Clean Air Act, directed federal executive departments and agencies to initiate a regulatory freeze for certain rules that have not taken effect pending review by the newly appointed agency head, directed federal agencies to identify and exercise emergency authority to facilitate conventional energy production, transportation, and refining, and mandated a review of existing regulations that may burden domestic energy development. Thus, the future of the new methane and waste emission charge rules, as well as the regulation of GHGs by the federal government, is uncertain at this time.
If we are unable to recover or pass through a significant portion of our costs related to complying with current and future regulations relating to climate change and GHGs, it could materially affect our operations and financial condition. Any future laws or regulations that limit emissions of GHGs from our equipment and operations could require us to both develop and implement new practices aimed at reducing GHG emissions, such as emissions control technologies, which could increase our operating costs and could adversely affect demand for the oil and gas that we produce. To the extent financial markets view climate change and GHG emissions as a financial risk, this could negatively impact our cost of, and access to, capital. Future implementation or adoption of legislation or regulations adopted to address climate change could also make our products more or less desirable than competing sources of energy. At this time, it is not possible to quantify the impact of any such future developments on our business.
Occupational Safety and Health Act and Other Laws and Regulations. We are subject to the requirements of the U.S. federal Occupational Safety and Health Act (the “Occupational Safety and Health Act”) and comparable state laws. The Occupational Safety and Health Act hazard communication standard, the EPA community right-to-know regulations under the Title III of CERCLA and similar state laws require that we organize and disclose information about hazardous materials
used or produced in our operations. Also, pursuant to the Occupational Safety and Health Act, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (the “OSHA”) has established a variety of standards related to workplace exposure to hazardous substances and employee health and safety.
Human Capital
As of December 31, 2024, on a consolidated basis, we had 1,036 full-time employees and six contractors. We believe we have good relations with our employees. As of December 31, 2024, our parent company had 13 full-time employees and one contractor, our Intellectual Property Operations Business had six full-time employees and two contractors; our Industrial Operations Business had 134 full-time employees and no contractors; our Energy Operations Business had 41 full-time employees and no contractors; and our Manufacturing Operations Business had 842 full-time employees and three contractors.
Additionally, we have a strategic relationship with Starboard that has enhanced, and we expect will continue to enhance, our access to operating partners and industry experts with whom we evaluate potential acquisition opportunities, which enhances the oversight and value creation of our businesses. Starboard has provided, and we expect will continue to provide, ready access to its extensive network of industry executives and, as part of our relationship, Starboard has assisted, and we expect will continue to assist, with sourcing and evaluating appropriate acquisition opportunities.
Executive Officers and Directors
Information About our Executive Officers
Name Position
Martin (“MJ”) D. McNulty, Jr. Chief Executive Officer
Jason Soncini General Counsel
Robert Rasamny Chief Administrative Officer
Kirsten Hoover Interim Chief Financial Officer
Information About our Directors
Name Position
Gavin Molinelli Senior Partner and Co-Portfolio Manager of Starboard Value LP
Martin (“MJ”) D. McNulty, Jr. Chief Executive Officer of the Company
Isaac T. Kohlberg Senior Associate Provost and Chief Technology Development Officer at Harvard University
Maureen O’Connell Member of the Board of Directors of ISACA and HH Global Ltd.
Geoff Ribar Member of the Board of Directors of MACOM Technology and Everspin Technologies, Inc.
Ajay Sundar Managing Director at Starboard Value LP
Michelle Felman Member of Board of Directors of Cushman Wakefield
For Additional Information
For further details of the development of our business, refer to our website at www.acaciaresearch.com. The information on our website is not part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K and is not incorporated herein by reference.

---

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
Our short and long-term success is subject to numerous risks and uncertainties, many of which involve factors that are difficult to predict or beyond our control. As a result, an investment in our common stock involves risks. In evaluating our business, our stockholders are encouraged to carefully consider the risks described below, together with all other information included in this Annual Report, as well as in our other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). If any of these risks are realized, our business, financial condition, results of operations, and prospects could be materially adversely affected, and the trading price of our common stock could significantly fluctuate. Furthermore, additional risks and uncertainties of which we are currently unaware, or which we currently consider to be immaterial, could have a material adverse effect on our business. Certain statements below constitute “forward-looking statements,” which are subject to numerous risks and uncertainties, including those described in this section. For additional information, refer to the section entitled “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” within this Annual Report.
Risks Related to Our Business and Business Strategy
We intend to grow our company by acquiring additional operating businesses and intellectual property assets which may not occur, and any acquisitions that we complete will be costly and could negatively affect our results of operations, and dilute our stockholders’ ownership, or cause us to incur significant expense, and we may not realize the expected benefits of our operating businesses because of difficulties related to integration.
We intend to grow our company by acquiring additional operating businesses and intellectual property assets. Our growth and success will be dependent on identifying and acquiring operating companies and intellectual property at attractive prices to realize their intrinsic value. However, there can be no assurance that we will identify attractive acquisition targets, that acquisition opportunities we identify will be available on acceptable terms or at attractive prices, or that we will be able to obtain necessary financing or regulatory approvals to complete any acquisitions.
Further, the success of any acquisition depends on, among other things, our ability to combine our business with the acquired business in a manner that does not materially disrupt existing relationships and allows us to achieve development and operational synergies.
Acquisitions involve numerous risks and uncertainties, including:
•difficulties in integrating and managing the combined operations, technology platforms, or offerings of any business we acquire, and realizing the anticipated economic, operational and other benefits of the acquisition in a timely manner, which could result in substantial costs and delays;
•failure to execute on the intended strategy and synergies;
•failure of the acquired operating businesses to achieve anticipated revenue, earnings, or cash flow;
•diversion of management’s attention or other resources from our existing business;
•higher-than-expected earn-out payments, unforeseen transaction-related costs or delays or other circumstances such as disputes with or the loss of key or other personnel from acquired businesses;
•inability to maintain the key customers, business relationships, suppliers, and brand potential of acquired operating businesses;
•uncertainty of entry into businesses or geographies in which we have limited or no prior experience or in which competitors have stronger positions;
•unanticipated costs associated with pursuing acquisitions or greater than expected costs in integrating the acquired businesses;
•responsibility for the liabilities of acquired businesses, including those that were not disclosed to us or exceed our estimates, such as liabilities arising out of the failure to maintain effective privacy, data protection and cybersecurity controls, and liabilities arising out of the failure to comply with applicable laws and regulations, including tax laws;
•difficulties in or costs associated with assigning or transferring to us the acquired operating business’ intellectual property or its licenses to third-party intellectual property;
•inability to maintain our culture and values, ethical standards, controls, procedures, and policies;
•challenges in integrating the workforce of acquired companies and the potential loss of key employees of the acquired companies;
•challenges in integrating and auditing the financial statements of acquired companies that have not historically prepared financial statements in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles; and
•potential accounting charges to the extent goodwill and intangible assets recorded in connection with an acquisition, such as trademarks, customer relationships, or intellectual property, are later determined to be impaired and written down in value.
It is possible that the integration process of acquired businesses could result in the loss of key employees; the disruption of Acacia’s ongoing business or the ongoing business of the acquired operating businesses; or inconsistencies in standards, controls, procedures or policies that could adversely affect our ability to maintain relationships with third parties and employees or to achieve the anticipated benefits of the acquisition. Integration efforts between us and the acquired businesses will also require management’s significant attention away from other opportunities that could have been beneficial to our stockholders. An inability to realize the full extent of, or any of, the anticipated benefits of any acquisition, as well as any delays encountered in the integration process, could have an adverse effect on our business and results of operations, which may affect the value of the shares of our common stock after the completion of our acquisitions. If we are unable to achieve these objectives, the anticipated benefits of the acquisition may not be realized fully or at all or may take longer to realize than expected. In particular, our acquisitions may not be accretive to our stock value in the near or long term.
In addition, we may issue shares of our common stock or other equity securities in connection with future acquisitions of businesses and technologies. Any such issuances of shares of our common stock could result in material dilution to our existing stockholders.
We expect to incur additional costs integrating the operations of any operating business and utilizing any intellectual property assets we acquire, as we incur higher development and regulatory costs, and must hire relevant personnel. If the total costs of the integration or utilization of our businesses or assets exceed the anticipated benefits of the acquisition, our financial results could be adversely affected.
Accordingly, we may not succeed in addressing the risks associated with our recent acquisitions or any other operating business we acquire in the future. The inability to successfully, or in a timely fashion, integrate the business, technologies, products, personnel, or operations of any acquired business or utilization of any assets, could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, and financial condition.
Our success is dependent on our ability to attract and retain the employees and management teams of our operating businesses, the loss of whom could materially adversely affect our financial condition, business and results of operations.
Our business model requires qualified and competent professionals and management teams to identify and develop advantaged opportunities and to direct day-to-day activities of our operating businesses, as the case may be. Accordingly, recruiting and retaining qualified personnel is important to our strategy and operating businesses’ operations. Additionally, although our operating businesses have adequate personnel for the current business environment, unpredictable increases in demand for goods and services may exacerbate the risk of not having enough trained or qualified personnel, which could have a negative impact on our results of operations, financial condition and liquidity.
Our operating businesses also need qualified and competent personnel to execute their business plans and serve their customers, suppliers and other stakeholders. To compete, we must attract, retain, and motivate both executives and other key employees, and our failure to do so could harm our financial performance. Hiring and retaining qualified executives, operations personnel (including operating partners), engineers, technical staff, sales, marketing and support positions are and will be critical to businesses, and competition for experienced employees in the industries of our operating businesses can be intense.
To help attract, retain, and motivate qualified employees and management, we must offer a competitive compensation package, which could include a combination of cash, cash-based incentive awards and share-based incentive awards, such as restricted stock units. Because our cash-based and share-based incentive awards are dependent upon the performance conditions relating to our performance and the performance of the price our common stock and other performance-based metrics, the future value of such awards are uncertain. If the anticipated value of such incentive awards does not materialize, or if the total compensation package ceases to be viewed as competitive, our ability to attract, retain, and motivate employees could be weakened, which could harm our results of operations.
Our success substantially depends on our ability to attract and retain key members of our management team and officers. If we lose one or more of these key employees, our operational results, and in turn, the value of our common stock could be materially adversely affected. Although we may enter into employment agreements with our officers, there can be no assurance that the entire term of any employment agreement will be served or that any employment agreement will be renewed upon expiration.
The success of our Company and the integration of our operating businesses is dependent on our relationship with Starboard.
As part of our relationship, Starboard has assisted, and is expected to continue assisting, us with sourcing and evaluating appropriate acquisition opportunities. If we or Starboard were to discontinue this relationship, we may not be able to continue to adequately source acquisition opportunities.
Additionally, the success of our Company depends on the continued availability of, and our access to, Starboard’s industry expertise and operating partners and industry experts. We do not have employment agreements with these individuals who are independent of Starboard and Starboard’s key personnel. If these individuals do not maintain their existing relationships with Starboard and its affiliates, we may not be able to identify appropriate replacements to continue to adequately source acquisition opportunities or manage our existing operating businesses.
The due diligence process we undertake in connection with new acquisitions of operating businesses or intellectual property assets may not reveal all material facts.
Before making acquisitions, we conduct due diligence that we deem reasonable and appropriate based on the facts and applicable circumstances. When conducting due diligence, we may be required to evaluate important and complex business, financial, tax, accounting, environmental and legal issues. Outside consultants, legal advisers, accountants and investment banks may be involved in the due diligence process to varying degrees depending on the type of business and transaction. Nevertheless, when conducting due diligence and making an assessment regarding acquisitions, we rely on the resources available to us, including information provided by the target of the transaction and, in some circumstances, third party investigations. The due diligence investigation that we carry out regarding any opportunity may not reveal or highlight all relevant facts (including fraud) that may be necessary or helpful in evaluating such opportunity. Moreover, such an investigation will not necessarily result in the acquisition being successful. If we do not discover all material facts during due diligence, we may fail to integrate our operating businesses and execute our strategic goals, which may impact our financial performance.
Our acquisition strategy may include acquisitions of privately held companies, which provide more limited information, may be dependent on the talents and efforts of only a few key portfolio company personnel, and have greater vulnerability to economic downturns when compared to public company targets.
From time to time, we acquire, and may acquire, privately held companies. Generally, little public information exists about these companies, and we are required to rely on diligence efforts to obtain adequate information to evaluate the potential returns from investing in these companies. These companies and their financial information are not subject to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and other rules that govern public companies. If we are unable to uncover all material information about these companies, we may not make a fully informed decision, and we may lose money on our acquisition.
If, in the future, we cease to control and operate our operating businesses, we may be deemed to be an investment company under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended.
From time to time, we have made, and we may continue to make, investments in businesses that we will not operate or control. If we make significant investments in businesses we do not operate or control, or cease to operate and control our operating businesses, we may be deemed to be an investment company under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as
amended (the “Investment Company Act”). If we were deemed to be an investment company, we would have to register as an investment company under the Investment Company Act, obtain exemptive relief from the SEC, or modify our investments or organizational structure or our contract rights to fall outside the definition of an investment company.
Registered investment companies are subject to extensive, restrictive and potentially adverse regulations that impose, among other things, (i) limitations on capital structure, including the incurrence of indebtedness or the issuance of senior securities; (ii) restrictions on specified investments; (iii) prohibitions on transactions with affiliates; and (iv) compliance with reporting, record keeping, voting, proxy disclosure and other rules and regulations that would significantly change our operations. Registered investment companies are not permitted to operate their business in the manner in which we currently operate and plan to operate our business in the future.
We plan to monitor the value of our investments and structure our operations and transactions to qualify for exclusions under the Investment Company Act or to remain outside of the definition of an investment company. Accordingly, we may structure transactions in a less advantageous manner than if we did not have Investment Company Act concerns, or we may avoid otherwise economically desirable transactions due to those concerns. In addition, adverse developments with respect to our ownership of our operating subsidiaries, including significant appreciation or depreciation in the market value of certain of our publicly traded holdings, could result in our inadvertently becoming an investment company. If it were established that we were required to register as an investment company and failed to do so, there would be a risk, among other material adverse consequences, that we could become subject to monetary penalties or injunctive relief, or both, in an action brought by the SEC and that we would be prohibited from engaging in our business activities. In addition, any contracts that we entered into during the period in which we were deemed to be operating as an unregistered investment company would be unenforceable unless a court were to require enforcement, and a court could appoint a receiver to take control of us and liquidate our business.
Both we and our operating businesses outsource a number of services to third-party service providers, which are subject to risk of disruptions, delays, and decrease in our control, which could adversely impact our operational results.
Both we and our operating businesses outsource several services, including certain hosted software applications for confidential data storage and “cloud computing” technology for such storage to domestic and overseas third-party service providers. While outsourcing arrangements may lower our cost of operations, they also reduce our direct control over the services rendered. Such diminished control could influence the quality or quantity of products delivered or services rendered, on our ability to quickly respond to changing market conditions, or our ability to ensure compliance with all applicable domestic and foreign laws and regulations.
In addition, many of these outsourced service providers, including certain hosted software applications that we use for confidential data storage, employ cloud computing technology for such storage. These providers’ cloud computing systems may be susceptible to cyber incidents, such as intentional cyberattacks aimed at theft of sensitive data or inadvertent cybersecurity compromises that are outside of our control. Miscalculations in our outsourcing strategies, deficiencies by our third-party service providers to not perform as anticipated or not adequately protect our data, or delays or difficulties in enhancing business processes, may result in operational difficulties (such as limitations on our ability to ship products), increased costs, service interruptions or delays, loss of intellectual property rights or other sensitive data, quality and compliance issues, and challenges in managing our product inventory or recording and reporting financial and management information, any of which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We may be limited in our ability to use our net operating losses and certain other tax attributes.
Our ability to use our net operating losses to offset potential future taxable income and related income taxes that would otherwise be due is dependent upon our generation of future taxable income before the expiration dates of the net operating losses. We cannot predict with certainty when, or whether, we will generate sufficient taxable income to use all or any portion of our net operating losses. In addition, utilization of net operating losses and tax credit carryovers to offset potential future taxable income and related income taxes that would otherwise be due is subject to annual limitations under the provisions of Sections 382 and 383 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), and similar state / foreign provisions, if we were to experience an “ownership change.” In particular, under the Code, if a corporation undergoes an “ownership change,” generally defined as a greater than 50% change (by value) in its equity ownership over a three-year period, the corporation’s ability to use its pre-change net operating losses and other pre-change tax attributes (such as foreign tax credit carryforwards) to offset its post-change taxable income or taxes may be limited. Changes in our stock ownership, some of which may be outside of our control, could in the future result in an ownership change. Although we have adopted a provision in our certificate of incorporation designed to discourage investors from acquiring ownership
of our common stock in a manner that could trigger a Code Section 382 ownership change, and we have completed studies to provide reasonable assurance that a Code Section 382 ownership change has not occurred to date for our existing businesses, we cannot be certain that a taxing authority would reach the same conclusion. If, after a review or audit, a Code Section 382 ownership change were deemed to have occurred, utilization of our net operating losses and other tax attributes could be limited in future periods and a portion of the carryforwards could expire before being available to reduce future income tax liabilities.
We have identified a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting at Benchmark, which could, if not remediated, have negative consequences for the Company.
Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 requires any company subject to the reporting requirements of the U.S. securities laws to include in its annual report on Form 10-K an assessment of its and its consolidated subsidiaries’ internal control over financial reporting. To comply with this statute, we are required to issue a statement as to whether or not our internal control over financial reporting is effective; and our independent auditors are required to issue an audit opinion on our internal control over financial reporting. As of December 31, 2024, we did not maintain effective internal control over financial reporting attributable to a certain identified material weakness. We describe this material weakness in Item 9A, “Controls and Procedures,” in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. A material weakness is defined as a deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of our annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. The material weaknesses will not be considered remediated until the applicable new or enhanced controls operate for a sufficient period and management has concluded, through testing, that these controls are operating effectively. If our remedial measures are insufficient to address the material weakness, or if one or more additional material weaknesses or significant deficiencies in our internal control over financial reporting are discovered or occur in the future, our consolidated financial statements may contain material misstatements and we could be required to restate our financial results, which could, in turn, harm our reputation, cause a decline in investor confidence and in the market price of our stock, or restrict our access to capital markets.
Data security and integrity are critically important to our business, and cybersecurity incidents-including cyberattacks, breaches of security, unauthorized access to or disclosure of confidential information, business disruption, or the perception that confidential information is not secure-could result in a material loss of business, regulatory enforcement, substantial legal liability and/or significant harm to our reputation, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Improper access to, misappropriation, destruction or disclosure of confidential, personal or proprietary data could result in significant harm to our reputation or the reputation of any of our operating businesses.
The security and protection of our and their data is a top priority. We and our operating businesses have devoted significant resources to maintain and regularly upgrade the wide array of physical, technical and contractual safeguards that we and they employ to provide security around the collection, storage, use, access and delivery of information we and they possess. We and they have implemented various measures to manage the risks related to system and network security and disruptions, but an actual or perceived security breach, a failure to make adequate disclosures to the public or relevant agencies following any such event or a significant and extended disruption in the functioning of information technology systems could damage our or one of our operating businesses’ reputation and cause us to lose opportunities or them to lose clients, adversely impact our operations, sales or results of operations and require us or them to incur significant expense to address and remediate or otherwise resolve such issues.
Although neither we nor our business have incurred material losses or liabilities to date as a result of any breaches, unauthorized disclosure, loss or corruption of our or their data or the inability of their clients to access their systems, such events could result in proprietary, confidential or otherwise protected information being lost or stolen, including client, employee or business data, disrupt their operations, subject us or them to substantial regulatory and legal proceedings and potential liability and fines, result in a material loss of business and/or significantly harm our or their reputation. If we are unable to efficiently manage the vulnerability of our systems and effectively maintain and upgrade system safeguards, we and they may incur unexpected costs and certain of our or their systems may become more vulnerable to unauthorized access.
Due to concerns regarding data privacy and security, a growing number of legislative and regulatory bodies have adopted breach notification and other requirements in the event that information subject to such laws is accessed by unauthorized persons and additional regulations regarding the use, access, accuracy and security of such data are possible. Complying
with such numerous and complex regulations can be expensive and difficult, and failure to comply with these regulations could subject us to regulatory scrutiny and liability. In many jurisdictions, including North America and the European Union, certain of our operating companies are or may in the future be subject to laws and regulations relating to the collection, use, retention, security and transfer of this information including the European Union and United Kingdom General Data Protection Regulation regimes. California also enacted legislation, the California Consumer Privacy Act of 2018 (“CCPA”) and the related California Privacy Rights Act (“CPRA”) that afford California residents expanded privacy protections and a private right of action for security breaches affecting their personal information. Since then, many other U.S. states have passed comprehensive data privacy laws and this number will likely continue to grow. These and other similar laws and regulations are frequently changing and are becoming increasingly complex and sometimes conflict among the various jurisdictions and countries in which certain of our operating companies provide services both in terms of substance and in terms of enforceability. This makes compliance challenging and expensive. For example, an operating company’s failure to adhere to or successfully implement processes in response to changing regulatory requirements in this area could result in legal liability or impairment to our reputation in the marketplace.
If we or they are unable to protect our or their computer systems, software, networks, data and other technology assets it could have a material adverse effect on our or their business, financial condition and results of operations, and ultimately the value of our businesses.
We have a history of losses, and we may not be consistently profitable in the future.
While we achieved profitability in 2023, we incurred net losses in 2024 and have incurred net losses in certain years prior. We will need to generate and sustain increased revenue levels in future periods in order to become consistently profitable, and even if we do, we may not be able to maintain or increase our level of profitability. We may incur losses in the future for a number of reasons, including the risks described in these risk factors, an increase in operating expense, and other unknown risks. Any failure by us to sustain profitability on a consistent basis could cause the value of our common stock to decline.
Public health threats, pandemics and outbreaks of communicable diseases could have a material adverse effect on our operations, the operations of our business partners, and the global economy as a whole.
Public health threats, pandemics and outbreaks of communicable diseases could adversely impact our operations, as well as the operations of our licensees and other business partners. We have taken precautions in the operation of our own business and maintain an up-to-date disaster recovery and business continuity policy as well as have the systems and support to have our workforce work remotely for an indefinite period of time. However, future public health threats, pandemics or outbreaks of communicable diseases, similar to the COVID-19 outbreak, could have a material adverse effect on our business, operations and financial results.
We are a “controlled company” within the meaning of the Nasdaq listing standards and, as a result, qualify for, and may in the future decide to rely on, exemptions from certain corporate governance requirements. As a result, our stockholders will not have the same protections afforded to stockholders of companies that are subject to such requirements if in the future we determine to take advantage of any of the controlled company exemptions.
Due to the completion of the transactions pursuant to the Recapitalization Agreement, Starboard controls a majority of the voting power of our outstanding common stock. As of March 12, 2025, Starboard controlled approximately 63.6% of the voting power of our common stock. As a result, we qualify as a “controlled company” within the meaning of the corporate governance standards of Nasdaq. Under these rules, a listed company of which more than 50% of the voting power is held by an individual, group or another company is a “controlled company” and may avail itself of certain corporate governance exemptions afforded to controlled companies, including the requirements that a majority of the Board consist of independent directors, we have a nominating and corporate governance committee that is composed entirely of independent directors, and we have a compensation committee that is composed entirely of independent directors.
As of the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, we have not elected to rely on any of these exemptions. However, if in the future we decide to rely on some or all of these exemptions, our stockholders will not have the same protections afforded to stockholders of companies that are subject to all of the corporate governance requirements of Nasdaq.
Our principal stockholder, Starboard, controls 63.6% of the voting power of our Common Stock, and its interests may conflict with our other stockholders in the future.
Starboard beneficially owns 61,123,595 shares of common stock as of March 12, 2025, representing approximately 63.6% of the common stock based on 96,086,040 shares of common stock issued and outstanding as of such date. As a result, Starboard is able to control the election of our directors and thereby determine our corporate and management policies, including potential mergers or acquisitions, asset sales, amendment of our amended and restated certificate of incorporation or amended and restated bylaws and other significant corporate transactions for so long as Starboard and its affiliates retain significant ownership of us. Starboard and its affiliates may also direct us to make significant changes to our business operations and strategy, including with respect to, among other things, strategic acquisitions, investments and initiatives to reduce costs and expenses. This concentration of our ownership may delay or deter possible changes in control of the Company, which may reduce the value of an investment in our common stock. The interests of Starboard may not coincide with the interests of other holders of our common stock.
In the ordinary course of their business activities, Starboard and its affiliates may engage in activities where their interests conflict with our interests or those of our stockholders. Starboard and its affiliates also may pursue acquisition or investment opportunities that may be complementary to our business and, as a result, those acquisition or investment opportunities may not be available to us. In addition, Starboard may have an interest in pursuing acquisitions, divestitures and other transactions that, in their judgment, could enhance an investment in our Company, even though such transactions might involve risks for our stockholders.
In addition, Starboard and its affiliates can determine the outcome of all matters requiring stockholder approval and can cause or prevent a change of control of our Company or a change in the composition of our Board and could preclude any acquisition of our Company. This concentration of voting control could deprive our stockholders of an opportunity to receive a premium for shares of common stock as part of a sale of our Company and ultimately might affect the market price of our common stock.
Risks Related to our Intellectual Property Business and Industry
Our intellectual property business is reliant on the strength of our patent portfolios and is subject to evolving legislation, regulations, and rules associated with patent law.
The success of our intellectual property business is heavily dependent on obtaining and enforcing patents. Patent acquisition and enforcement is costly, time-consuming and inherently uncertain. Obtaining and enforcing patents across various industries, including the life science industry, involves a high degree of technological and legal complexity. Our patent rights may be affected by developments or uncertainty in U.S. or foreign patent statutes, patent case law, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) rules and regulations and the rules and regulations of foreign patent offices. In addition, the United States may, at any time, enact changes to U.S. patent law and regulations, including by legislation, by regulatory rulemaking, or by judicial precedent, that adversely affects the scope of patent protection available and weakens the rights of patent owners to obtain patents, enforce against patent infringement and obtain injunctions and/or damages. For example, over the past several years, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and the Supreme Court issued various opinions, and the USPTO modified its guidance for practitioners on multiple occasions, either narrowing the scope of patent protection available in certain circumstances or weakening the rights of patent owners in certain situations. Other countries may likewise enact changes to their patent laws in ways that adversely diminish the scope of patent protection and weaken the rights of patent owners to obtain patents, enforce against patent infringement, and obtain injunctions and/or damages. In addition to increasing uncertainty regarding our ability to obtain patents in the future, this combination of events has created uncertainty with respect to the value of patents, once obtained. We cannot predict the breadth of claims that may be allowed or enforced in our patents or in third-party patents, and whether Congress or other foreign legislative bodies may pass patent reform legislation that is unfavorable to us, which, may in turn, affect the value of our patent assets.
Further, the United States and other governments may, at any time, enact changes to law and regulation that create new avenues for challenging the validity of issued patents. For example, the America Invents Act created new administrative post-grant proceedings, including post-grant review, inter-partes review, and derivation proceedings that allow third parties to challenge the validity of issued patents. This applies to all of our U.S. patents, even those issued before March 16, 2013. Because of a lower evidentiary standard in USPTO proceedings compared to the evidentiary standard in U.S. federal courts necessary to invalidate a patent claim, a third party could potentially provide evidence in a USPTO proceeding sufficient for the USPTO to hold a claim invalid even though the same evidence would be insufficient to invalidate the claim if first presented in a district court action. In addition to increasing uncertainty regarding our ability to obtain patents in the future,
this combination of events has created uncertainty with respect to the value of patents, once obtained. Depending on decisions by the U.S. Congress, the federal courts, and the USPTO, the laws and regulations governing patents could change in unpredictable ways that could weaken our ability to obtain new patents or to enforce our existing patents and patents that we might obtain in the future.
Additionally, new rules regarding the burden of proof in patent enforcement actions could significantly increase the cost of our enforcement actions, and new standards or limitations on liability for patent infringement could negatively impact our revenue derived from such enforcement actions. In addition, recent federal court decisions have lowered the threshold for obtaining attorneys’ fees in patent infringement cases and increased the level of deference given to a district court’s fee-shifting determination. These decisions may make it easier for district courts to shift a prevailing party’s attorneys’ fees to a non-prevailing party if the district court believes that the case was weak or conducted in an abusive manner. As a result, defendants in patent infringement actions brought by non-practicing entities may elect not to settle because these decisions make it much easier for defendants to get attorneys’ fees.
Finally, it is difficult to predict the outcome of patent enforcement litigation at the trial level and outcomes can be unfavorable. It can be difficult to understand complex patented technologies, and as a result, this may lead to a higher rate of unfavorable litigation outcomes. Moreover, in the event of a favorable outcome, there is often a higher rate of successful appeals in patent enforcement litigation than more standard business litigation. Such appeals are expensive and time consuming, resulting in increased costs and a potential for delayed or foregone revenue opportunities in the event of modification or reversal of favorable outcomes. Although we diligently pursue enforcement litigation, we cannot predict with reliability the decisions made by juries and trial courts.
We expect patent-related legal expenses to continue to fluctuate.
Our patent-related legal expenses may fluctuate based on the factors summarized herein, in connection with future trial dates, international enforcement, strategic patent portfolio prosecution and our current and future patent portfolio investment, prosecution, licensing and enforcement activities. The pursuit of enforcement actions in connection with our licensing and enforcement programs can involve certain risks and uncertainties, including the following:
•Increases in patent-related legal expenses associated with patent infringement litigation, including, but not limited to, increases in costs billed by outside legal counsel for discovery, depositions, economic analyses, damages assessments, expert witnesses and other consultants, re-exam and inter partes review costs, case-related audio/video presentations and other litigation support and administrative costs could increase our operating costs and decrease our profit generating opportunities;
•Our patented technologies and enforcement actions are complex and, as a result, we may be required to appeal adverse decisions by trial courts to successfully enforce our patents. Moreover, such appeals may not be successful;
•New legislation, regulations or rules related to enforcement actions, including any fee or cost shifting provisions, could significantly increase our operating costs and decrease our profit generating opportunities. Increased focus on the growing number of patent-related lawsuits may result in legislative changes which increase our costs and related risks of asserting patent enforcement actions;
•Courts may rule that our subsidiaries have violated certain statutory, regulatory, federal, local or governing rules or standards by pursuing such enforcement actions, which may expose us and our operating subsidiaries to material liabilities, which could harm our operating results and our financial position;
•The complexity of negotiations and potential magnitude of exposure for potential infringers associated with higher quality patent portfolios may lead to increased intervals of time between the filing of litigation and potential revenue events (i.e., markman dates, trial dates), which may lead to increased legal expenses, consistent with the higher revenue potential of such portfolios; and
•Fluctuations in overall patent portfolio related enforcement activities, which are impacted by the portfolio intake challenges discussed above that could harm our operating results and our financial position.
Patent litigation is inherently risky because courts may find our patents invalid, not infringed, or unenforceable, and the USPTO, or other relevant patent office, may either invalidate our patents or materially narrow the scope of their claims during a reexamination, opposition or other such proceeding.
Patent litigation is inherently risky and may result in the invalidation of our patents, even if we are the plaintiff in an underlying action. It is difficult to predict the outcome of patent enforcement litigation at any level.
Although we diligently pursue enforcement litigation, we cannot predict with significant reliability the decisions made by juries and trial courts. At the trial level, it is often difficult for juries and trial judges to understand complex, patented technologies, and as a result, there is a higher rate of successful appeals in patent enforcement litigation than more standard business litigation.
The defendant to any case we bring may file as many appeals as allowed by right, including to District Court, the Federal Circuit and the Supreme Court. Such appeals are expensive and time-consuming, and the outcomes of such appeals are sometimes unpredictable, resulting in increased costs and reduced or delayed revenue which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition. These appeals may also result in the invalidation of our patents, which may have an adverse impact on our operations and financial performance.
In addition, counterparties in our patent litigation matters may devote a substantial amount of resources to avoid or limit a finding that they are liable for infringing on our patents or, in the event liability is found, to avoid or limit the amount of associated damages. There is a risk these counterparties may file inter-partes reviews, reexaminations or other proceedings with the USPTO or other government agencies in the United States or abroad to invalidate, narrow the scope or render unenforceable the patents we own or control. If this were to occur, it may have a significant negative impact on the operations of our intellectual property business.
The enforcement of our intellectual property depends in part upon our ability to retain the best legal counsel in order to achieve favorable outcomes from litigation, and they may become conflicted out of representing us.
The success of our intellectual property business depends in part upon our ability to retain the best legal counsel to coordinate our patent infringement litigation matters. As our intellectual property business evolves, we expect it will become more difficult to find the best legal counsel to handle all of our patent matters due in part to potential conflicts of interest. This is because, from time to time, the counterparties to our litigation matters have previously engaged world class law firms that specialize in the industries of the patents at issue in such matters. These previous engagements may have, or may in the future, result in these firms being conflicted out of representing us.
The inability to retain the best legal counsel to represent our operating businesses in infringement actions may result in unfavorable or adverse outcomes, which may result in losses, exhaustion of financial resources or other adverse effects which could encumber our ability to effectively operate our business or execute our business strategy. We cannot ensure that any of our current or prospective patent prosecution or litigation matters will result in a favorable outcome for us.
We may experience delays in successful prosecution, enforcement, and licensing of our patent portfolio.
The value of our patent portfolios is dependent upon the issuance of patents in a timely manner. More patent applications are filed each year, resulting in longer delays in getting patents issued by the USPTO. We believe this increase in patent applications has resulted in longer delays in obtaining approval of pending patent applications. If the USPTO experiences reductions in funding, it could have an adverse impact on the cost of processing pending patent applications and the value of those pending patent applications, negatively impacting the value of our patent portfolio pipeline. Further, reductions in funding from Congress could result in higher patent application filing and maintenance fees charged by the USPTO, causing an increase in our expenses. Application delays could cause delays in recognizing revenue from these patents and could cause us to miss opportunities to license patents before other competing technologies are developed or introduced into the market.
After prosecuting our patents, our Intellectual Property business can incur significant general and administrative and legal expenses prior to entering into license agreements and generating license revenues. We spend considerable resources educating prospective licensees on the benefits of a license arrangement with us. As such, we may incur significant losses in any particular period before any associated revenue stream begins.
We are frequently engaged in litigation to enforce the terms of our existing license agreements, protect our trade secrets, or determine the validity and scope of the proprietary rights of others. Enforcement proceedings are typically protracted and complex. The costs are typically substantial, and the outcomes are unpredictable. Enforcement actions divert our managerial, technical, legal and financial resources from business operations and there are no assurances that such enforcement actions will result in favorable results for us.
Patent litigation schedules in general, and in particular trial dates, are subject to routine adjustment, and in most cases delay, as courts adjust their calendars or respond to requests from one or more parties. Trial dates often are rescheduled by the court for various reasons that are often unrelated to the underlying patent assets and typically for reasons that are beyond our control. As a result, to the extent such events are an indicator of possible future revenue opportunities for us, or other outcome determinative events, they may and often do change which can result in delay of the expected scheduled event. Any such delay could be significant and could affect the corresponding future revenue opportunities, thus adversely impacting our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Further, federal courts are becoming more crowded, and as a result, patent enforcement litigation is taking longer. Our patent enforcement actions are almost exclusively prosecuted in federal court. Federal trial courts that hear our patent enforcement actions also hear criminal cases. Criminal cases tend to take priority over our actions. As a result, it is difficult to predict the length of time it will take to complete an enforcement action. Moreover, we believe there is a trend in increasing numbers of civil lawsuits and criminal proceedings before federal judges and, as a result, we believe that the risk of delays in our patent enforcement actions will have a greater negative effect on our business in the future unless this trend changes.
Risks Related to our Energy Operations Business and Industry
If oil and gas prices decline from current levels, or if there is an increase in the differential between the NYMEX-WTI and NYMEX-Henry Hub or other benchmark prices of oil and the wellhead price we receive for our production, our cash flows from our Energy Operations Business will decline.
Historically, crude oil, natural gas and NGL prices have been extremely volatile. The volatility of the energy markets makes it extremely difficult to predict future oil price movements with any certainty.
While our Energy Operations Business hedges a significant portion of its production, lower crude oil, natural gas and NGL prices may decrease revenues and therefore, cash flows from operations. Prices for crude oil, natural gas and NGL may fluctuate widely in response to relatively minor changes in supply of and demand for crude oil, natural gas and NGLs. Market uncertainty and a variety of additional factors that are beyond the control of our Energy Operations Business, include: the domestic and foreign supply of and demand for crude oil, natural gas and NGLs; market expectations about future prices of crude oil, natural gas and NGLs; the price and quantity of imports of crude oil, natural gas and NGLs; overall domestic and global economic conditions; political and economic conditions in other oil producing countries, including embargoes and continued hostilities in the Middle East and other sustained military campaigns, acts of terrorism or sabotage, and world-wide epidemics, including the coronavirus; the ability of the members of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries to agree to and maintain oil price and production controls; trading in oil derivative contracts; the level of consumer product demand; weather conditions and natural disasters; technological advances affecting energy consumption; domestic and foreign governmental regulations and taxes; the proximity, cost, availability and capacity of oil pipelines and other transportation facilities; the impact of the U.S. dollar exchange rates on oil prices; and the price and availability of alternative fuels.
Also, the prices that our Energy Operations Business receives for oil and gas production often reflects a regional discount, based on the location of the production, to the relevant benchmark prices, such as the NYMEX-WTI and NYMEX-Henry Hub, that are used for calculating hedge positions. These discounts, if significant, could similarly adversely affect cash flows from operations and financial condition.
If commodity prices decline from current levels, production from some of Benchmark’s assets may become uneconomic and cause write downs of the value of its properties, which may adversely affect its ability to borrow, its financial condition and its ability to make distributions.
If commodity prices decline from current levels, some of Benchmark’s assets may become uneconomic and, if the decline is severe or prolonged, a significant portion of such projects may become uneconomic. As producing or development
projects become uneconomic, Benchmark's reserve estimates will be adjusted downward, which could negatively impact its borrowing base under its current revolving credit facility and its ability to fund operations.
Additionally, there is a risk that Benchmark will be required to write down the carrying value of its oil and natural gas properties when oil or natural gas prices are low or are declining, as occurred in 2020. In addition, non-cash write-downs may occur if it has:
•downward adjustments to its estimated proved reserves;
•increases in its estimates of development costs; or
•deterioration in its exploration and development results.
A write-down does not affect net cash flows from operating activities, liquidity or capital resources, but it does reduce the book value of net tangible assets, retained earnings and shareholders’ equity, and could lower the value of our common stock.
The oil and natural gas industry and the broader U.S. economy have experienced higher than expected inflationary pressures in recent years related to increases in oil and natural gas prices, continued supply chain disruptions, labor shortages and geopolitical instability, among other pressures. Should these conditions persist, it may impact our Energy Operations Business’ ability to procure services, materials and equipment on a cost-effective basis, or at all, and, as a result, our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows could be materially and adversely affected.
Inflation in the U.S. has been much more significant in recent years. Energy companies have experienced significant increases in the costs of certain oilfield services, materials and equipment, including diesel, steel, labor, trucking, sand, personnel and completion costs, among others, as a result of recent increases in oil and natural gas prices, as well as availability constraints, supply chain disruptions, increased demand, labor shortages and wage inflation associated with a low U.S unemployment rate, inflation and other factors. These supply and demand fundamentals have been further aggravated by disruptions in global energy supply caused by multiple geopolitical events, including the ongoing military conflict between Russia and Ukraine and actions of U.S. and other governments and governmental organizations relating to Russia’s oil, natural gas and NGLs, including through sanctions, embargoes, import restrictions and commodity price caps. For the foreseeable future, our Energy Operations Business expects to experience supply chain constraints and inflationary pressure on its cost structure. Should oil and natural gas prices remain at their current levels or increase, our Energy Operations Business expects to be subject to additional service cost inflation in future periods, which may increase costs to drill, complete, equip and operate wells. In addition, supply chain disruptions and other inflationary pressures being experienced throughout the U.S. and global economy and in the oil and natural gas industry may limit our Energy Operations Business’ ability to procure the necessary products and services needed for drilling, completing and producing wells in a timely and cost-effective manner, which could result in reduced margins and delays to its operations and could, in turn, have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
Our Energy Operations Business’s hedging strategy may be ineffective in mitigating the impact of commodity price volatility on cash flows, which could adversely affect its financial condition.
Benchmark’s hedging strategy is to enter into commodity derivative contracts covering a significant portion of its medium-term estimated hydrocarbon production. The prices at which it can enter into commodity derivative contracts covering its production in the future will be dependent upon commodity futures prices at the time it enters into these transactions, which may be substantially higher or lower than current prices.
Benchmark’s revolving credit facility prohibits it from entering into commodity derivative contracts with the purpose and effect of fixing prices covering all of its estimated future production, and we therefore retain the risk of a price decrease on Benchmark’s volumes which we are precluded from securing with commodity derivative contracts. Furthermore, we may be unable to enter into additional commodity derivative contracts during favorable market conditions and, thus, may be unable to lock in attractive future prices for our product sales. Finally, Benchmark’s revolving credit facility and associated amendments may cause Benchmark to enter into commodity derivative contracts at inopportune times.
Our Energy Operations Business’s hedging activities could result in cash losses and may limit the prices it would otherwise realize for production, which could reduce cash flows from operations.
Benchmark’s hedging strategy may limit its ability to realize cash flows from commodity price increases. Many of its commodity derivative contracts require Benchmark to make cash payments to the extent the applicable index exceeds a predetermined price, thereby limiting its ability to realize the benefit of increases in oil prices. If Benchmark’s actual production and sales for any period are less than its hedged production and sales for that period (including reductions in production due to operational delays), Benchmark might be forced to satisfy all or a portion of its hedging obligations without the benefit of the cash flow from the sale of the underlying physical commodity, which may materially adversely impact its liquidity, financial condition and cash flows from operations.
Our Energy Operations Business’s hedging transactions expose it to counterparty credit risk and involve other risks.
Benchmark’s hedging transactions exposes it to the risk of financial loss if a counterparty fails to perform under a commodity derivative contract. Disruptions in the financial markets could lead to a sudden decrease in a counterparty’s liquidity, which could impair its ability to perform under the terms of the commodity derivative contract and, accordingly, prevent Benchmark from realizing the benefit of the commodity derivative contract.
As a result of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and other legislation, hedging transactions and many of Benchmark’s contract counterparties have come under increasing governmental oversight and regulations in recent years. Although we cannot predict the ultimate impact of these laws or other proposed laws and the related rulemaking, some of which is ongoing, existing or future regulations may adversely affect the cost and availability of Benchmark’s hedging arrangements, including by causing its counterparties, which include lenders under its revolving credit facility, to curtail or cease their derivative activities.
Unless Benchmark replaces the oil and natural gas reserves it produces, its revenues and production will decline, which would adversely affect its cash flows from operations.
Producing oil and natural gas reservoirs are characterized by declining production rates that vary depending upon reservoir characteristics and other factors. The future oil and natural gas reserves and production and, therefore, cash flows from operations of our Energy Operations Business are highly dependent on its success in economically acquiring additional recoverable reserves and efficiently operating its current reserves. The production decline rates of our Energy Operations Business may be significantly higher than currently estimated if its wells do not produce as expected. Further, the decline rate may change when Benchmark makes acquisitions.
Producing oil and natural gas is a costly and high-risk activity with many uncertainties that could adversely affect our Energy Operations Business’s activities, financial condition or results of operations.
The cost of operating oil and natural gas properties is often uncertain, and cost and timing factors can adversely affect the economics of a well. The efforts of our Energy Operations Business may be uneconomical if its properties are productive but do not produce as much oil and natural gas as estimated. Furthermore, the operations of our Energy Operations Business may be curtailed, delayed or canceled as a result of other factors, including: high costs, shortages or delivery delays of equipment, labor or other services; unexpected operational events and conditions; adverse weather conditions and natural disasters; injection plant or other facility or equipment malfunctions and equipment failures or accidents; title disputes; unitization difficulties; pipe or cement failures, casing collapses or other downhole failures; compliance with environmental and other governmental requirements; lost or damaged oilfield service tools; unusual or unexpected geological formations and reservoir pressure; loss of injection fluid circulation; restrictions in access to, or disposal of, water used or produced in oil and natural gas production; costs or delays imposed by or resulting from compliance with regulatory requirements; fires, blowouts, surface craterings, explosions and other hazards that could also result in personal injury and loss of life, pollution and suspension of operations; and uncontrollable flows of oil or well fluids.
If any of these factors were to occur with respect to a particular property, Benchmark could lose all or a part of its investment in the property, or it could fail to realize the expected benefits from the property, either of which could materially and adversely affect the financial condition or results of operations.
Estimated proved reserves and future production rates are based on many assumptions that may prove to be inaccurate. Any material inaccuracies in these reserve estimates or underlying assumptions will materially affect the quantities and present value of the estimated reserves of our Energy Operations Business.
It is not possible to measure underground accumulations of oil and natural gas in an exact way. Oil and natural gas reserve engineering is complex, requiring subjective estimates of underground accumulations of oil and natural gas and assumptions concerning future oil and natural gas prices, future production levels and operating and development costs. As a result, estimated quantities of proved reserves, projections of future production rates and the timing of development expenditures may prove inaccurate.
Any material inaccuracies in these reserve estimates or underlying assumptions will materially affect the quantities and present value of our reserves which could affect our Energy Operations Business’s results of operations, financial condition and its ability to make distributions.
Any acquisitions completed by our Energy Operations Business are subject to substantial risks that could adversely affect financial conditions and operational results.
One of the growth strategies of our Energy Operations Business is to capitalize on opportunistic acquisitions of oil and gas reserves. Our Energy Operations Business may not achieve the expected results of any acquisition it completes, and any adverse conditions or developments related to any such acquisition may have a negative impact on its operations and financial condition. Any acquisition involves potential risks, including, among other things: the validity of assumptions about estimated proved reserves, future production, commodity prices, revenues, operating expenses and costs; an inability to successfully integrate the assets it acquires; a decrease in liquidity by using a significant portion of available cash or borrowing capacity to finance acquisitions; a significant increase in interest expense or financial leverage if it incurs additional debt to finance acquisitions; the assumption of unknown liabilities, losses or costs for which it is not indemnified or for which its indemnity is inadequate; the diversion of management’s attention from other business concerns; an inability to hire, train or retain qualified personnel to manage and operate its growing assets; and the occurrence of other significant charges, such as the impairment of oil properties, goodwill or other intangible assets, asset devaluations or restructuring charges.
The decision to acquire a property will depend in part on the evaluation of data obtained from production reports and engineering studies, geophysical and geological analyses and seismic data and other information, the results of which are often inconclusive and subject to various interpretations.
Also, reviews of properties acquired from third parties may be incomplete because it generally is not feasible to perform an in-depth review of the individual properties involved in each acquisition, given the time constraints imposed by most sellers. Even a detailed review of the properties owned by third parties and the records associated with such properties may not reveal existing or potential problems, nor will such a review permit our Energy Operations Business to become sufficiently familiar with such properties to assess fully the deficiencies and potential issues associated with such properties. Our Energy Operations Business may not always be able to inspect every well on properties owned by third parties, and environmental problems, such as groundwater contamination, are not necessarily observable even when an inspection is undertaken.
Currently, our producing properties are concentrated in the Anadarko Basin, making us vulnerable to risks associated with operating in a limited number of geographic areas.
As a result of our geographic concentration, adverse industry developments in our operating area could have a greater impact on our financial condition and results of operations than if we were more geographically diverse. We may also be disproportionately exposed to the impact of regional supply and demand factors, governmental regulations or midstream capacity constraints. Delays or interruptions caused by such adverse developments could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
Similarly, the concentration of our assets within a small number of producing formations exposes us to risks, such as changes in field wide rules, which could adversely affect development activities or production relating to those formations. In addition, in areas where exploration and production activities are increasing, as has recently been the case in our operating areas, we are subject to increasing competition for drilling rigs, workover rigs, tubulars and other well equipment, services, supplies as well as increased labor costs and a decrease in qualified personnel, which may lead to periodic shortages or delays. The curtailments arising from these and similar circumstances may last from a few days to
several months or even longer, and, in many cases, we may be provided only limited, if any, notice as to when these circumstances will arise and their duration.
Our Energy Operations Business is primarily dependent upon a small number of customers for production sales and may experience a temporary decline in revenues and production if it loses any of those customers.
The loss of customers by our Energy Operations Business could temporarily delay production and sales of oil and natural gas. If our Energy Operations Business were to lose any of its significant customers, we believe that it could identify substitute customers to purchase the impacted production volumes. However, if any of its customers dramatically decreased or ceased purchasing oil from our Energy Operations Business, our Energy Operations Business may have difficulty receiving comparable rates for its production volumes.
In addition, a failure by any of these significant customers, or any purchasers of the production of our Energy Operations Business to perform their payment obligations to us could have a material adverse effect on the results of operations. To the extent that purchasers of production rely on access to the credit or equity markets to fund their operations, there could be an increased risk that those purchasers could default in their contractual obligations. If for any reason our Energy Operations Business was to determine that it was probable that some or all of the accounts receivable from any one or more of the purchasers of production were uncollectible, our Energy Operations Business would recognize a charge in the earnings of that period for the probable loss and could suffer a material reduction in liquidity and ability to make distributions.
Our Energy Operations Business might be unable to effectively compete with larger companies, which might adversely affect its business activities, financial condition and operational results.
The oil and natural gas industry is intensely competitive, and our Energy Operations Business competes with companies that possess and employ financial, technical and personnel resources substantially greater than theirs. These companies may be able to pay more for properties and evaluate, bid for and purchase a greater number of properties than our Energy Operations Business’s financial, technical or personnel resources permit. The ability of our Energy Operations Business to acquire additional properties in the future will depend on its ability to evaluate and select suitable properties and to consummate transactions in a highly competitive environment. Many of its larger competitors not only drill for and produce oil and natural gas but also carry-on refining operations and market petroleum and other products on a regional, national or worldwide basis. In addition, there is substantial competition for investment capital in the oil and natural gas industry. These larger companies may have a greater ability to continue development activities despite a depressed oil price environment and to absorb the burden of present and future federal, state, local and other laws and regulations. The inability of our Energy Operations Business to compete effectively with larger companies could have a material adverse impact on its business activities, financial condition and results of operations.
Many of our Energy Operations Business’s leases are in areas that have been partially depleted or drained by offset wells.
Many of our Energy Operations Business’s leases are in areas that have already been partially depleted or drained by earlier offset drilling. The owners of leasehold interests lying contiguous or adjacent to or adjoining our interests could take actions, such as drilling additional wells, which could adversely affect the operations of our Energy Operations Business. When a new well is completed and produced, the pressure differential in the vicinity of the well causes the migration of reservoir fluids towards the new wellbore (and potentially away from existing wellbores). As a result, the drilling and production of these potential locations could cause a depletion of proved reserves and may inhibit the ability to further develop our reserves.
Our Energy Operations Business’s revolving credit facility has restrictions and financial covenants that may restrict its business and financing activities.
Our Energy Operations Business’s revolving credit facility restricts, among other things, the ability to incur debt and pay distributions under certain circumstances and requires it to comply with customary financial covenants and specified financial ratios. If market or other economic conditions deteriorate, the ability of our Energy Operations Business to comply with these covenants may be impaired. If our Energy Operations Business violates any provisions of its revolving credit facility that are not cured or waived within specific time periods, a significant portion of its indebtedness may become immediately due and payable, it could be prohibited from making distributions, and its lenders’ commitment to make further loans may terminate. Our Energy Operations Business might not have, or be able to obtain, sufficient funds to make these accelerated payments. In addition, the obligations of our Energy Operations Business under its revolving credit
facility are secured by substantially all of its assets, and if it is unable to repay its indebtedness under its revolving credit facility, the lenders could seek to foreclose on its assets.
The total amount our Energy Operations Business can borrow under its revolving credit facility is limited by a borrowing base, which is primarily based on the estimated value of its oil and natural gas properties and its commodity derivative contracts, as determined by its lenders in their sole discretion. The borrowing base is subject to redetermination on a semi-annual basis and more frequent redetermination in certain circumstances. If its lenders were to decrease the borrowing base to a level below the then outstanding borrowings, the amount exceeding the revised borrowing base could become immediately due and payable. The negative redetermination of the borrowing base could adversely affect our Energy Operations Business's business, results of operations, financial condition and the ability to make distributions. Furthermore, in the future, our Energy Operations Business may be unable to access sufficient capital under its revolving credit facility as a result of any decrease in the borrowing base.
The operations of our Energy Operations Business are subject to operational hazards and unforeseen interruptions for which it may not be adequately insured.
Our oil and gas properties can become damaged, our operations may be curtailed, delayed or canceled and the costs of such operations may increase as a result of a variety of factors, including, but not limited to:
•unexpected drilling conditions, pressure conditions or irregularities in reservoir formations;
•loss of drilling fluid circulation;
•equipment failures or accidents;
•fires, explosions, blowouts, cratering or loss of well control, as well as the mishandling, surface spillage or underground migration of fluids and chemicals;
•risks associated with hydraulic fracturing, including any mishandling, surface spillage or potential underground migration of fracturing fluids, including chemical additives;
•adverse weather conditions and natural disasters, such as tornadoes, earthquakes, hurricanes and extreme temperatures, which may be exacerbated by climate change;
•issues with title or in receiving governmental permits or approvals;
•restricted takeaway capacity for our production, including due to inadequate midstream infrastructure or constrained downstream markets;
•environmental hazards or liabilities, including liabilities for environmental damage caused by previous owners or operators of properties;
•restrictions on access to, or disposal of, water used or produced in drilling and completion operations;
•shortages or delays in the availability of services or delivery of equipment; and
•unexpected or unforeseen changes in regulatory policy, and political or public opinions.
Any of these or other similar occurrences could result in the disruption of operations, substantial repair costs, personal injury or loss of human life, significant damage to property, environmental pollution, impairment of operations and substantial revenue losses. The location of our Energy Operations Business’s wells and other facilities near populated areas, including residential areas, commercial business centers and industrial sites, could significantly increase the level of damages resulting from these risks.
Insurance against all operational risks is not available. Our Energy Operations Business is not fully insured against all risks, including development and completion risks that are generally not recoverable from third parties or insurance. In addition, pollution and environmental risks generally are not fully insurable. Additionally, our Energy Operations Business may elect not to obtain insurance if it believes that the cost of available insurance is excessive relative to the perceived
risks presented. Losses could, therefore, occur for uninsurable or uninsured risks or in amounts in excess of existing insurance coverage. Moreover, insurance may not be available in the future at commercially reasonable costs and on commercially reasonable terms. Changes in the insurance markets due to weather and adverse economic conditions have made it more difficult to obtain certain types of coverage. As a result, our Energy Operations Business may not be able to obtain the levels or types of insurance it would otherwise have obtained prior to these market changes, and we cannot be sure the insurance coverage it does obtain will not contain large deductibles or fail to cover certain hazards or cover all potential losses. Losses and liabilities from uninsured and under-insured events and delay in the payment of insurance proceeds could have a material adverse effect on the business, financial condition, results of operations and ability of our Energy Operations Business to make distributions.
Benchmark is not the operator of all of our oil and natural gas properties and therefore we are not in a position to control the timing of development efforts, the associated costs or the rate of production of the reserves on such properties.
Benchmark is not the operator of all of the properties in which we have an interest, and has limited ability to exercise influence over the operations of such non-operated properties or their associated costs. As of December 31, 2024, non-operated wells represented approximately 10 percent of Benchmark’s total owned gross wells, or 2 percent of Benchmark’s owned net wells. Dependence on the operator and other working interest owners for these projects, and limited ability to influence operations and associated costs, could prevent the realization of targeted returns on capital in drilling or acquisition activities. The success and timing of development and exploration activities on properties operated by others will depend upon a number of factors that will be largely outside of our control, including:
•the timing and amount of capital expenditures;
•the availability of suitable drilling equipment, production and transportation infrastructure and qualified operating personnel;
•the operator’s expertise and financial resources;
•approval of other participants in drilling wells;
•selection of technology; and
•the rate of production of the reserves.
In addition, when we are not the majority owner or operator of a particular oil or natural gas project, if we are not willing or able to fund our capital expenditures relating to such projects when required by the majority owner or operator, our interests in these projects may be reduced or forfeited.
Oil and natural gas production operations, especially those using hydraulic fracturing, are substantially dependent on the availability of water. Our ability to produce natural gas, oil and NGL economically and in commercial quantities could be impaired if we are unable to acquire adequate supplies of water for our operations or are unable to dispose of or recycle the water resulting from our operations economically and in an environmentally safe manner.
Water is an essential component of oil and natural gas production during the drilling, and in particular, hydraulic fracturing, process. Our inability to locate sufficient amounts of water, or dispose of or recycle water resulting from our exploration and production operations, could adversely impact our operations. For water sourcing, we first seek to use non-potable water supplies for our operational needs. In certain areas, there may be insufficient local aquifer capacity to provide a source of water for drilling activities. Water must then be obtained from other sources and transported to the drilling site, which may adversely impact operating costs or result in a delay or interruption of operations. Further, an inability to secure sufficient amounts of water or to dispose of or recycle the water used in our operations could adversely impact our operations in certain areas. The imposition of new environmental regulations could further restrict our ability to conduct operations such as hydraulic fracturing by restricting the disposal of substances such as produced water and drilling fluids.
Our Energy Operations Business depends in part on transportation, pipelines and refining facilities owned by others. Any limitation in the availability of those facilities could interfere with an ability to market production and could harm its business.
The marketability of production depends in part on the availability, proximity and capacity of pipelines, tanker trucks and other transportation methods and refining facilities owned by third parties. The amount of oil that can be produced and sold is subject to curtailment in certain circumstances, such as pipeline interruptions due to scheduled and unscheduled maintenance, excessive pressure, physical damage or lack of available capacity on such systems, tanker truck availability and extreme weather conditions. Also, the shipment of oil on third party pipelines may be curtailed or delayed if it does not meet the quality specifications of the pipeline owners. The curtailments arising from these and similar circumstances may last from a few days to several months. In many cases, our Energy Operations Business is provided only with limited, if any, notice as to when these circumstances will arise and their duration. Any significant curtailment in gathering system or transportation or refining facility capacity could reduce the ability to market oil production and harm our Energy Operations Business. Access to transportation options and the prices our Energy Operations Business receives for production can also be affected by federal and state regulation, including regulation of oil production and transportation, and pipeline safety, as well by general economic conditions and changes in supply and demand. In addition, the third parties on whom our Energy Operations Business relies for transportation services are subject to complex federal, state, tribal and local laws that could adversely affect the cost, manner or feasibility of conducting business.
Climate change legislation, regulatory initiatives and litigation could result in increased operating costs and reduced demand for the oil and natural gas that our Energy Operations Business produces.
We believe it is likely that scientific, political and public attention to issues concerning the extent, causes of and responsibility for climate change will continue, with the potential for regulatory changes and litigation that could affect the operations of our Energy Operations Business. Our Energy Operations Business operations result GHG emissions. In December 2009, the EPA published its findings that emissions of carbon dioxide, methane and other GHG present a danger to public health and the environment. Based on this endangerment findings, the EPA began adopting and implementing regulations that restrict emissions of GHG under existing provisions of the federal Clean Air Act (“CAA”). However, in January 2025, the Trump administration issued an executive order directing the EPA to re-evaluate the legality and continuing applicability of the endangerment finding. Although there have been attempts at comprehensive federal legislation establishing a GHG cap and trade program, these efforts were not successful. Various states have considered or adopted legislation that seeks to control or reduce GHG emissions from a wide range of sources and there may be future such efforts at the state level. In addition, the United States has at times been a party to certain international agreements, pacts and other commitments designed to address climate change and reduce GHG emissions, including the Paris Agreement and the Glasgow Climate Pact. However, in January 2025, the Trump administration issued an executive order directing the U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations to immediately submit formal written notification of the U.S.’s withdrawal from the Paris Agreement and any agreement, pact, accord or similar commitment made under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, which would include the Glasgow Climate Pact.
The adoption and implementation of any legislation or regulations to reduce GHG emissions or imposing additional GHG reporting obligations could require our Energy Operations Business to incur significant costs to reduce emissions of GHG associated with operations or comply with such reporting obligations. Any such legislation or regulatory programs could also increase the cost of consuming, and thereby reduce demand for, the oil and natural gas produced by our Energy Operations Business. Consequently, legislation and regulatory programs to reduce emissions of GHGs could have a material adverse effect on our Energy Operations Business. Reduced demand for the oil and natural gas that it produces could also have the effect of lowering the value of its reserves. In addition, there have also been efforts in recent years to influence the investment community, including investment advisors, investment fund managers and certain family foundations, universities, individual investors and sovereign wealth, pension and endowment funds, promoting divestment of, or limit investment in, fossil fuel equities and pressuring lenders to limit or stop funding to companies engaged in the extraction of fossil fuel reserves. Such environmental activism and initiatives aimed at limiting climate change and reducing air pollution could interfere with the business activities, operations and ability to access capital by or of our Energy Operations Business.
Finally, increasing attention to the risks of climate change has resulted in an increased possibility of lawsuits or investigations brought by public and private entities against companies engaged in oil and natural gas production in connection with their GHG emissions. Should we be targeted by any such litigation or investigations, we may incur liability, which, to the extent that societal pressures or political or other factors are involved, could be imposed without regard to the causation of or contribution to the asserted damage, or to other mitigating factors. The ultimate impact of
GHG agreements, legislation and measures on our financial performance is highly uncertain because we are unable to predict, for a multitude of individual jurisdictions, the outcome of political decision-making processes and the variables and trade-offs that inevitably occur in connection with such processes.
In an interpretative guidance on climate change disclosures, the SEC indicated that climate change could influence the severity of weather (including hurricanes, droughts and floods), sea levels, the arability of farmland and water availability and quality. If such effects were to occur, there is the potential for our Energy Operations Business’s exploration and production operations to be adversely affected. Potential adverse effects could include damages to the assets or facilities of our Energy Operations Business, or to transportation, pipeline and refinery owned by others on which their operations depend, from powerful winds or rising waters in low-lying areas, disruption of production, less efficient or non-routine operating practices necessitated by climate effects and increased costs for insurance coverage in the aftermath of such effects. Any future exploration and development activities and equipment could also be adversely affected by severe weather conditions such as hurricanes or freezing temperatures, which may cause a loss of production from temporary cessation of activity from regional power outages or lost or damaged facilities and equipment. Such severe weather conditions could also impact access to drilling and production facilities for routine operations, maintenance and repairs and the availability of and access to, necessary third-party services, such as gathering, processing, compression and transportation services. These constraints and the resulting shortages or high costs could delay or temporarily halt our Energy Operations Business’s operations and materially increase its operation and capital costs, which could have a material adverse effect on its business, financial condition and results of operations. Significant physical effects of climate change could also have an indirect effect on the financing and operations of our Energy Operations Business by disrupting the transportation or process-related services provided by it or other midstream companies, service companies or suppliers with whom it has a business relationship. Our Energy Operations Business may not be able to recover through insurance some or any of the damages, losses or costs that may result from potential physical effects of climate change.
Regulation in response to seismic activity could increase our operating and compliance costs.
An increase in seismic activity in northern and central Oklahoma and elsewhere have prompted concerns about possible relationships between such seismic activity and the energy industry, in particular a possible connection between the operation of injection wells used for produced water disposal and the increased occurrence of seismic activity. Legislative and regulatory initiatives intended to address these concerns may result in additional levels of regulation that could lead to operational delays, increases in operating and compliance costs or other adverse effects to the operations or Energy Operations Business. To date, these regulations have not adversely impacted such operations.
The adoption and implementation of any new laws, rules, regulations, requests, or directives that restrict the ability to dispose of water, including by plugging back the depths of disposal wells, reducing the volume of oil and natural gas wastewater disposed in such wells, restricting disposal well locations, or by requiring the shut-down of disposal wells, could have a material adverse effect on the ability of our Energy Operations Business to produce oil and natural gas economically, or at all, and accordingly, could materially and adversely affect the business, financial condition and results of operations of our Energy Operations Business.
Rules regulating air emissions from oil and natural gas operations could result in increased capital expenditures and operating costs for our Energy Operations Business.
In recent years, the EPA issued final rules to subject oil and natural gas operations to regulation under the New Source Performance Standards (“NSPS”) and National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (“NESHAP”) programs under the CAA and to impose new and amended requirements under both programs. The EPA rules include NSPS standards for completions of hydraulically fractured oil and natural gas wells, compressors, controllers, dehydrators, storage tanks, natural gas processing plants and certain other equipment. These rules have required changes to our operations, including the installation of new equipment to control emissions. In December 2023, the EPA issued final NSPS updates and emission guidelines to reduce methane and other pollutants from the oil and gas industry. In April 2024, the EPA issued a final consent decree that established a December 10, 2024 deadline for the EPA to review and propose revisions to the NESHAP for oil and natural gas production facilities and natural gas transmission and storage facilities, which may require us to make additional changes to our operations. The EPA has not yet proposed any such revisions. The EPA issued a final rule on October 22, 2024, removing the affirmative defense for violations caused by malfunctions from the NESHAP for the oil and natural gas production source category and natural gas transmission and storage source category. On November 18, 2024, the EPA published a final rule under authority of the IRA that imposes a waste emissions charge on large emitters of waste methane from the oil and gas sector. Multiple states have filed suit against the EPA in the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia claiming that the waste emissions charge exceeds
the agency’s statutory authority, and various proposals have been advanced in Congress to either repeal the waste charge portion of the IRA or to reverse the EPA’s implementing regulations through the Congressional Review Act. Several states are pursuing measures similar to those proposed or adopted by the EPA top regulate emissions of methane from new and existing sources within the oil and natural gas source category.
As a result of this continued regulatory focus, future federal and state regulations of the oil and natural gas industry remain a possibility. Compliance with existing or new air emission requirements could increase costs of development and production, though we do not expect these requirements to be any more burdensome to our Energy Operations Business than to other similarly situated companies involved in oil and natural gas exploration and production activities.
Our Energy Operations Business’s operations are subject to environmental and operational safety laws and regulations that may expose it to significant costs and liabilities.
Our Energy Operations Business may incur significant costs and liabilities due to environmental and safety requirements applicable to oil and natural gas development and production activities. These costs and liabilities could arise under a wide range of federal, state, tribal and local environmental and safety laws and regulations, including regulations and enforcement policies, which have tended to become increasingly strict over time. Failure to comply with these laws and regulations may result in the assessment of administrative, civil and criminal penalties, imposition of cleanup and site restoration costs and liens, liability for natural resource damages, and to a lesser extent, issuance of injunctions to limit or cease operations. In addition, our Energy Operations Business may experience delays in obtaining or be unable to obtain required permits, which may delay or interrupt operations and limit growth and revenue. Claims for damages to persons or property from private parties and governmental authorities may result from environmental and other impacts of operations.
Strict, joint and several liabilities may be imposed under certain environmental laws, which could cause our Energy Operations Business to become liable for the conduct of others or for consequences of its own actions that were in compliance with all applicable laws at the time those actions were taken. New laws, regulations or enforcement policies could be more stringent and impose unforeseen liabilities or significantly increase compliance costs. If our Energy Operations Business is not able to recover the resulting costs through insurance or increased revenues, its ability to make cash distributions.
Risks Related to our Industrial Operations Business
Our Industrial Operations Business relies, or may rely in the future, on its intellectual property and licenses to use others’ intellectual property for competitive advantage. If our Industrial Operations Business is unable to protect its intellectual property or obtain or retain licenses to use other’s intellectual property, or if it infringes upon or are alleged to have infringed upon others’ intellectual property, it could have a material adverse effect on our Industrial Operations Business’s financial condition, business and results of operations.
Our Industrial Operations Business’s success depends in part on its, or licenses to use others’, brand names, proprietary technology and manufacturing techniques. It relies on a combination of patents, trademarks, copyrights, trade secrets, confidentiality procedures and contractual provisions to protect these intellectual property rights. The steps they have taken to protect their intellectual property rights may not prevent third parties from using their intellectual property and other proprietary information without their authorization or independently developing intellectual property and other proprietary information that is similar. In addition, the laws of foreign countries may not protect our businesses’ intellectual property rights effectively or to the same extent as the laws of the United States.
Stopping unauthorized use of our Industrial Operations Business’s proprietary information and intellectual property and defending claims that it has made unauthorized use of others’ proprietary information or intellectual property, may be difficult, time consuming, and costly. The use of intellectual property and other proprietary information by others could reduce or eliminate any competitive advantage our Industrial Operations Business has developed, cause it to lose sales or otherwise harm its business.
Our Industrial Operations Business may become involved in legal proceedings and claims in the future either to protect its intellectual property or to defend allegations that it infringed upon others’ intellectual property rights. These claims and any resulting litigation could subject our Industrial Operations Business to significant liability for damages and invalidate its property rights. In addition, these lawsuits, regardless of their merits, could be time consuming and expensive to resolve and could divert management’s time and attention. The costs associated with any of these actions could be substantial and
could have a material adverse effect on our Industrial Operations Business’s financial condition, business, and results of operations.
Our Industrial Operations Business’s inability to develop new products and enhance existing products to meet customer product requirements on a cost competitive basis may negatively impact operational results.
The future results of operations of our Industrial Operations Business may be adversely affected if it is unable to continue to develop, manufacture and market products that are reliable, competitive, and meet customers’ needs. The markets for matrix printers, associated supplies and software are aggressively competitive, especially with respect to pricing and the introduction of new technologies and products offering improved features and functionality. In addition, the introduction of any significant new and/or disruptive technology or business model by a competitor that substantially changes the markets into which our Industrial Operations Business sells its products or demand for the products it sells could severely impact sales of their products and our results of operations. The impact of competitive activities on the sales volumes or our revenue, or our inability to effectively deal with these competitive issues, could have a material adverse effect on our ability to attract and retain customers and maintain or grow market share. The competitive pressure to develop technology and products and to increase investment in research and development and marketing expenditures also could cause significant changes in the level of the operating expenses of our Industrial Operations Business.
Our Industrial Operations is dependent on a limited number of customers to derive a large portion of its revenue, and the loss of one of these customers may adversely affect its financial condition, business and operational results.
Printronix derives a significant amount of revenue from a concentrated number of retailers, distributors, and manufacturers. Any negative change involving these retailers, distributors, and manufacturers, including industry consolidation, store closings, reduction in purchasing levels or bankruptcies, could negatively impact the sales of Printronix and may have a material adverse effect on our Industrial Operations Business’s results of operations, financial condition, and cash flows.
Our Industrial Operations Business has limited suppliers for key product components and services and any interruption in supply could impair its ability to make and deliver its signature products, adversely affecting its business, financial condition, and operational results.
Outsourced providers and component suppliers have played, and will continue to play, a key role in Printronix’s manufacturing operations, field installation and support, and many of its transactional and administrative functions, such as information technology, facilities management, and certain elements of its finance organization. These providers and suppliers might suffer financial setbacks, be acquired by third parties, become subject to exclusivity arrangements that preclude further business with our Industrial Operations Business or be unable to meet its requirements or expectation due to independent business decisions, or force majeure events that could interrupt or impair its continued ability to perform as we expect.
Although our Industrial Operations Business may attempt to select reputable providers and suppliers and attempt to secure its performance on terms documented in written contracts, it is possible that one or more of these providers or suppliers could fail to perform as we expect, or fail to secure or protect intellectual property rights, and such failure could have an adverse impact on our Industrial Operations Business. In some cases, the requirements of Industrial Operations Business’s business mandate that it obtain certain components and sub-assemblies included in its products from a single supplier or a limited group of suppliers. Where practical, our Industrial Operations Business endeavors to establish alternative sources to mitigate the risk that the failure of any single provider or supplier will adversely affect its business, but this is not feasible in all circumstances. There is therefore a risk that a prolonged inability to obtain certain components or secure key services could impair our Industrial Operations Business’s ability to manage operations, ship products and generate revenues, which could adversely affect its results of operations and damage its customer relationships.
Failure of our Industrial Operations Business to manage inventory levels or production capacity may negatively impact its operational results.
Printronix’s financial performance depends in part upon its ability to successfully forecast the timing and extent of customer demand and reseller demand to manage worldwide distribution and inventory levels. Unexpected fluctuations in customer demand or in reseller inventory levels could disrupt ordering patterns and may adversely affect its financial results, inventory levels and cash flows. In addition, the financial failure or loss of a key customer, reseller or supplier could have a material adverse impact on its financial results. Our Industrial Operations Business must also address production and supply constraints, including product disruptions caused by quality issues, and delays or disruptions in the
supply of key components necessary for production. Such delays, disruptions or shortages may result in lost revenue or in additional costs to meet customer demand. Our Industrial Operations Business’s future results of operations and ability to effectively grow or maintain market share may be adversely affected if it is unable to address these issues on a timely basis.
Decreased consumption of supplies could negatively impact operational results of certain of our Industrial Operations Business.
Although Printronix is attempting to transition its business mix from lower-margin printer sales to higher-margin consumable products, it may not be successful. Printronix expects approximately 56.0% of its revenue for its fiscal year ending March 31, 2025 will be derived from the sale of supplies. Printronix's future results of operations may be adversely affected if the consumption of its supplies by end users of its products is lower than expected or declines, if there are declines in pricing, unfavorable mix and/or increased costs. Further, changes of printing behavior driven by adoption of electronic processes and/or use of mobile devices such as tablets and smart phones by businesses could result in a reduction in printing, which could adversely impact consumption of supplies.
Due to the international nature of our Industrial Operations Business, changes in a country’s or region’s political or economic conditions or other factors could negatively impact operational results.
We expect revenue derived from international sales by our Industrial Operations Business will comprise approximately 55.0% of Printronix’s revenue for its fiscal year ending March 31, 2025. Accordingly, Printronix’s future results could be adversely affected by a variety of factors, including changes in a specific country’s or region’s political or economic conditions; foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations; conflict and war; trade protection measures; local labor regulations; import, export or other licensing requirements; requirements related to making foreign direct investments; and unexpected changes in legal or regulatory requirements. As an example, in addition to indirectly raising transportation costs of the raw materials Printronix uses to manufacture its products, the invasion of Ukraine by Russia in March 2022 required Printronix to adapt its operations and require its customers in the region to pre-pay expenses such that Printronix can avoid accruing accounts receivable. The duration and magnitude of the impacts of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine on Printronix’s business remain uncertain, and we will continue to monitor the situation and adapt our operations accordingly.
In addition, changes in tax laws and the ability to repatriate cash accumulated outside the United States in a tax efficient manner may adversely affect Printronix’s financial results, investment flexibility and operations. Moreover, margins on international sales tend to be lower than those on domestic sales, and we believe international operations in emerging geographic markets will be less profitable than operations in the U.S. and European markets, in part, because of the higher investment levels for marketing, selling and distribution required to enter these markets.
In many foreign countries, particularly those with developing economies, it is common for local business practices to be prohibited by laws and regulations applicable to Printronix, such as employment laws, fair trade laws or the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. Although Printronix implements policies and procedures designed to ensure compliance with these laws, its employees, contractors and agents, as well as those business partners to which Printronix outsources certain business operations, may take actions in violation of these policies. Any such violation, even if prohibited by its policies, could have a material adverse effect on our Industrial Operations Business and reputation. Because of the challenges in managing a geographically dispersed workforce, there also may be additional opportunities for employees to commit fraud or personally engage in practices which violate the policies and procedures of our Industrial Operations Business.
Risks Related to our Manufacturing Operations Business
Our Manufacturing Operations Business is subject to intense competition.
Our Manufacturing Operations Business is subject to intense competition, competing with numerous other manufacturers and distributors of consumer and commercial products, many of which are large and well-established. The combination of market influences and retailer consolidation has created an intensely competitive environment in which our Manufacturing Operations Business’s principal customers continuously evaluate which product suppliers to use, resulting in downward pricing pressures and the need for consumer-meaningful brands, the ongoing introduction and commercialization of innovative new products, continuing improvements in category management and customer service, and the maintenance of strong relationships with large, high-volume purchasers. Our Manufacturing Operations Business also faces the risk of changes in the strategy or structure of its major customers, such as overall store and inventory reductions.
Our Manufacturing Operations Business’s sales are dependent on purchases by large customers and any significant decline in these purchases or pressure from these customers to reduce prices could have a negative effect on future financial performance.
While our Manufacturing Operations Business has long-established relationships with many customers, our Manufacturing Operations Business generally does not have any long-term supply or binding contracts or guarantees of minimum purchases with its largest customers. Purchase commitments by these customers are generally made using individual purchase orders. As a result, these customers may cancel their orders, change purchase quantities from forecast volumes, delay purchases for a number of reasons beyond our Manufacturing Operations Business’s control or change other terms of the business relationship. Significant or numerous cancellations, reductions, delays in purchases or changes in business practices by customers could have a material adverse effect on our Manufacturing Operations Business’s business, results of operations and financial condition. In addition, because many of our Manufacturing Operations Business’s costs are fixed, a reduction in customer demand due to decreased sales to end consumers could have an adverse effect on profitability.
Our Manufacturing Operations Business cannot provide any assurance that it can continue to successfully meet the needs of its customers or that customer demand will remain consistent. A substantial decrease in sales to any of its major customers and an inability to adapt to the emergence of alternative channels could have a material adverse effect on the business, results of operations and financial condition.
Our Manufacturing Operations Business’s operating results can be adversely affected by inflation, changes in the cost or availability of raw materials, labor, energy, transportation and other necessary supplies and services, as well as the impact of tariffs and changes in a country’s or region’s political or economic conditions.
Our Manufacturing Operations Business’s success is dependent, in part, on its continued ability to reduce its exposure to or mitigate the impact of increases in the cost of raw materials, finished goods, energy, transportation and other necessary supplies, while maintaining and improving margins and market share. Significant inflation in the costs of labor, finished goods, raw materials, energy and transportation has negatively impacted, and will likely continue to negatively impact results of operations. There is no assurance that we will be able to fully offset any such cost increases through cost reduction programs or price increases of our products, especially given the competitive environment. If we generally are not able to sufficiently increase our pricing to offset these increased costs or if increased costs and prolonged inflation were to occur, it could materially and adversely affect our business, operating results and profitability. Sustained price increases may lead to declines in volume as competitors may not adjust their prices or customers may decide not to pay the higher prices, which could lead to sales declines and loss of market share. While we seek to project tradeoffs between price increases and volume, our projections may not accurately predict the volume impact of price increases. Conversely, when raw material prices decline, customer demands for lower prices could result in lower sale prices and, to the extent our Manufacturing Operations Business has existing inventory, lower margins. As a result, fluctuations in raw material prices could have a material adverse effect on our Manufacturing Operations Business’s results of operations and financial condition.
In addition, some of the products our Manufacturing Operations Business manufactures require particular types of customized materials. Supply shortages for a particular type of material can delay production or cause increases in the cost of manufacturing our Manufacturing Operations Business’s products. Pricing and availability of finished goods, raw materials, energy, transportation and other necessary supplies and services for use in our Manufacturing Operations Business’s businesses can be volatile due to numerous factors beyond its control, including general, domestic and international economic conditions, natural disasters, labor costs, production levels, competition, consumer demand, import duties and tariffs, currency exchange rates, international treaties, and changes in laws, regulations, and related interpretations.
Specifically, evolving trade policies could continue to make sourcing products from foreign countries difficult and costly, as our Manufacturing Operations Business sources a significant amount of its products from outside of the United States. Given our Manufacturing Operations Business’s reliance upon non-domestic suppliers, any significant changes to the United States trade policies (and those of other countries in response) may cause a material adverse effect on its ability to source products from other countries or significant changes could significantly increase the costs of obtaining products, which could result in a material adverse effect on our financial results. Any additional tariffs on Chinese-origin goods, or on other certain products imported into the United States or European Union, such as carbon import taxes could increase the cost of some of our products and reduce our margins.
Further, the United States has recently imposed tariffs on goods imported from China and certain other countries, and increasingly levied sanctions and export controls on China and other countries. It is currently unclear what additional actions, if any, will be taken by the United States and other countries with respect to the imposition of tariffs on goods imported into the United States. During his campaign and during the first months of his administration, President Trump expressed various intentions to impose tariffs on goods shipped from China, Canada, Mexico and other countries to the United States, including up to 60% tariffs on goods shipped from China. Our Manufacturing Operations Business operates 9 manufacturing facilities across the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom and China, and we are continuing to evaluate the impact of these announced and other proposed tariffs. Implementation of tariffs by the United States, or the imposition of retaliatory tariffs and other restrictions by other countries, could result in a material increase in the cost of our Manufacturing Operations Business’s products, which may result in the products becoming less attractive relative to products offered by our competitors. These changes, as well as any other changes in social, political, regulatory and economic conditions, or further changes to foreign or domestic laws and policies governing foreign trade (including export, import and sanctions), manufacturing and development and foreign direct investment in the territories and countries where we or our customers operate could adversely affect our operating results and our business including our ability to repatriate cash accumulated outside the United States in a tax efficient manner.
Unfavorable shifts in industry-wide demand for our Manufacturing Operations Business’s products could result in inventory valuation risk.
Our Manufacturing Operations Business evaluates its ending inventories for excess quantities, impairment of value, and obsolescence. This evaluation includes analysis of sales levels by product and projections of future demand based upon input received from our customers, sales team, and management. If inventories on hand are in excess of demand or slow moving, appropriate write-downs may be recorded. In addition, our Manufacturing Operations Business writes off inventories that are considered obsolete based upon changes in customer demand, product design changes including those required by new product regulation, that result in existing inventory obsolescence, or new product introductions, which eliminate demand for existing products. Remaining inventory balances are adjusted to approximate net realizable market value.
If future demand or market conditions are less favorable than our Manufacturing Operations Business’s estimates, including the volatility of customer demand patterns and the impact of retailer inventory rebalancing in response to soft global demand, write-downs may be required. Our Manufacturing Operations Business cannot be certain that obsolete or excess inventories, which may result from unanticipated changes in the estimated total demand for its products, will not affect it beyond the inventory charges that have already been recorded.
Damage to our Manufacturing Operations Business’s reputation or loss of consumer confidence could have an adverse effect on our Manufacturing Operations Business.
Maintaining our Manufacturing Operations Business’s strong reputation with consumers, customers and suppliers worldwide is critical to our Manufacturing Operations Business’s continued success. Adverse publicity about our Manufacturing Operations Business, its brands, corporate practices, or any other issue that may be associated with our Manufacturing Operations Business, whether or not deserved, could jeopardize that reputation. Such adverse publicity could come from traditional sources such as government investigations or public or private litigation, but may also arise from negative comments on social media regarding our Manufacturing Operations Business or its brands. Damage to our Manufacturing Operations Business’s reputation or a loss of consumer confidence in our Manufacturing Operations Business’s brands could adversely affect our Manufacturing Operations Business’s business, results of operations, cash flows and financial condition as well as require resources to repair the harm.
Circumstances associated with divestitures and brand or product line exits could adversely affect our Manufacturing Operations Business’s results of operations and financial condition.
Our Manufacturing Operations Business may decide to sell or discontinue or exit certain brands, businesses or product lines in the future based on an evaluation of performance and strategic fit. Divestitures or discontinuations of businesses or products may result in asset impairments, including those related to goodwill and other intangible assets, and losses upon disposition, both of which could have an adverse effect on our Manufacturing Operations Business’s results of operations and financial condition. In addition, our Manufacturing Operations Business may encounter difficulty in finding buyers or executing alternative exit strategies at acceptable prices and terms and in a timely manner, and prospective buyers may
have difficulty obtaining financing. Past and future divestitures and business discontinuations also involve additional risks, including the following:
•difficulties in the separation of operations, services, products and personnel;
•the retention of certain current or future liabilities in order to induce a buyer to complete a divestiture;
•the disruption of our Manufacturing Operations Business’s business;
•the potential loss of key employees; and
•disputes or litigation with the buyers.
Our Manufacturing Operations Business may not be successful in managing these or any other significant risks that it may encounter in divesting, discontinuing or exiting a brand, business or product line, which could have a material adverse effect on its business.
Our Manufacturing Operations Business could be subject to product liability claims and involved in product recalls.
If our Manufacturing Operations Business’s products cause injury or property damage, we could be subject to product liability claims. The successful assertion of this type of claim could have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations or financial condition. In addition, we may become involved in the recall of a product that is determined to be defective. More generally, a recall involving alternative products, even if we did not sell the recalled products, could adversely affect the perceived quality of products such as our Manufacturing Operations Business’s products, leading to decreased usage of our Manufacturing Operations Business’s products. The expenses of a recall and the damage to our reputation, or the reputation of alternative products generally, could have an adverse effect on our Manufacturing Operations Business’s results of operations or financial condition.
Our Manufacturing Operations Business’s indebtedness may limit its financial and operating flexibility, and our Manufacturing Operations Business may incur additional debt, which could increase the associated risks.
Our Manufacturing Operations Business has, and is expected to continue to have, substantial indebtedness. Such indebtedness could have adverse consequences for our Manufacturing Operations Business and may:
•require our Manufacturing Operations Business to dedicate a large portion of cash flow to pay principal and interest on indebtedness, which will reduce the availability of cash flow to fund working capital, capital expenditures, research and development expenditures and other business activities;
•increase vulnerability to general adverse economic and industry conditions;
•subject our Manufacturing Operations Business to the risk of credit facility default (including with respect to financial covenant compliance) and the associated consequences;
•limit flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in business and the industry in which our Manufacturing Operations Business operates;
•restrict our Manufacturing Operations Business’s ability to make strategic acquisitions, dispositions or to exploit business opportunities;
•place our Manufacturing Operations Business at a competitive disadvantage compared to our competitors that have less debt; and
•limit our Manufacturing Operations Business’s ability to borrow additional funds (even when necessary to maintain adequate liquidity) or dispose of assets.
Our Manufacturing Operations Business may incur additional indebtedness. If new debt is added to our Manufacturing Operations Business’s existing debt levels, the related risks that our Manufacturing Operations Business now faces would increase.
Furthermore, our Manufacturing Operations Business’s current indebtedness is subject to variable interest rates. Increases in market interest rates may raise the interest rate on our Manufacturing Operations Business’s variable rate debt and create higher debt service requirements, which could adversely affect our Manufacturing Operations Business’s cash flow and could adversely impact our Manufacturing Operations Business’s results of operations. While our Manufacturing Operations Business may enter into agreements limiting exposure to higher debt service requirements, any such agreements may not offer complete protection from this risk.
Risks Related to our Common Stock
Our quarterly performance may be volatile, which in turn may adversely affect the trading price of our common stock.
Due to the nature of our intellectual property business and reliance on our operating businesses on intellectual property, legal expenses associated with acquisitions, uncertainties regarding the amount and timing of our receipt of license and other fees from potential infringers, stemming primarily from uncertainties regarding the outcome of enforcement actions, rates of adoption of our patented technologies, the growth rates of our existing licensees, and certain other factors, our revenues may vary significantly from quarter to quarter and period to period, which could make our business difficult to manage, adversely affect our business and results of operations, and cause our quarterly and periodic results to fall below market expectations. As a result of these factors, quarter-to-quarter comparisons of our financial results, especially in the short term, may have limited utility as an indicator of future performance. Significant variation in our quarterly performance, compounded by the thin trading volume of our common stock, could significantly and adversely affect the trading price of our common stock.
Future sales of our common stock could reduce the market price of our common stock.
In the future, we may issue securities to raise cash for operations and patent portfolio investments or pay for interests in additional subsidiary companies by using shares of our common stock or a combination of cash and shares of our common stock. We may also issue securities convertible into our common stock. Any of these events may dilute stockholders’ ownership interests in our company and have an adverse impact on the price of our common stock.
Sales of a substantial amount of our common stock in the public market, or the perception that these sales may occur, could reduce the market price of our common stock. This could also impair our ability to raise additional capital through the sale of our securities.
Delaware law and our charter documents contain provisions that could discourage or prevent a potential takeover of our company that might otherwise result in our stockholders receiving a premium over the market price of their shares.
The provisions of Delaware law and our certificate of incorporation and bylaws could make the acquisition of our company by means of a tender offer, proxy contest or otherwise, and the removal of incumbent officers and directors more difficult. These provisions include:
•Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, which prohibits a merger with a 15%-or-greater stockholder, such as a party that has completed a successful tender offer, until three years after that party became a 15%-or-greater stockholder;
•the authorization in our certificate of incorporation of undesignated preferred stock, which could be issued without stockholder approval in a manner designed to prevent or discourage a takeover; and
•the general restriction in our certificate of incorporation on any direct or indirect transfers of our common stock if the effect would be to (i) increase the direct or indirect ownership of our common stock by any person or group from less than 4.899% to 4.899% or more of our common stock; or (ii) increase the percentage of our common stock owned directly or indirectly by a person or group owning or deemed to own 4.899% or more of our common stock.
Together, these provisions may make the removal of management more difficult and may discourage transactions that could otherwise involve payment of a premium over prevailing market prices for our common stock.
In addition, Starboard beneficially owns 61,123,595 shares of our common stock as of March 12, 2025, representing approximately 63.6% of our common stock, based on 96,086,040 shares of common stock issued and outstanding as of such date. As a result, Starboard and its affiliates can determine the outcome of all matters requiring stockholder approval
and are able to cause or prevent a change of control of our Company or a change in the composition of our Board and could preclude any acquisition of our Company.
We do not currently intend to pay dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future, and consequently, your ability to achieve a return on your investment will depend on appreciation in the price of our common stock.
We do not anticipate paying any cash dividends to holders of our common stock in the foreseeable future. Consequently, investors must rely on sales of their common stock after price appreciation, which may never occur, as the only way to realize any future gains on their investments. There is no guarantee that shares of our common stock will appreciate in value or even maintain the price at which our stockholders have purchased their shares.
Starboard’s sale of Company securities may adversely affect the market price of our common stock.
As per the terms of the amended and restated registration rights agreement (the “Registration Rights Agreement”) with Starboard and certain of its affiliates, as contemplated by the Recapitalization Agreement (as described in Note 12 to the accompanying consolidated financial statements), the Registration Rights Agreement provides Starboard and such affiliates with rights to require that the Company file a registration statement in certain circumstances. These registrations may facilitate the resale of such securities into the public market, and any such resale would increase the number of shares of our common stock available for public trading. Sales by Starboard of a substantial number of shares of our common stock in the public market, or the perception that such sales might occur, could have a material adverse effect on the price of our common stock.
We agreed to certain Governance Provisions with Starboard.
Under the Recapitalization Agreement, we agreed with Starboard that for a period from the date of the Recapitalization Agreement until May 12, 2026, the Board will include at least two directors that are independent of, and not affiliates (as defined in Rule 144 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended) of, Starboard, with current Board members Maureen O’Connell and Isaac T. Kohlberg satisfying this initial condition. Additionally, within five business days following the date of the Recapitalization Agreement, the Company appointed Gavin Molinelli as a Board member and as Chair of the Board. The Company and Starboard have also agreed that until May 12, 2026, the number of directors serving on the Board will not exceed 10 members.

---

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
None.

---

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
Corporate
Our principal executive office is located in New York, New York, where we lease approximately 4,600 square feet of office space, under a lease agreement that expires in 2027. We also have an office for operational and administrative functions located in Costa Mesa, California, where we lease approximately 1,820 square feet of office space, under a lease agreement that expires in August 2027. We believe that our facilities are adequate, suitable and of sufficient capacity to support our immediate needs. Refer to Note 15 to the consolidated financial statements elsewhere herein for additional information.
Intellectual Property Operations
Our Patent Licensing, Enforcement and Technologies Business, is based in Frisco, Texas, where we lease office space under a lease agreement that expires in 2025. One additional subsidiary leases office space in Austin, Texas that expires in 2025. We believe that our Patent Licensing, Enforcement and Technologies Business’s facilities are adequate, suitable and of sufficient capacity to support its immediate needs.
Industrial Operations
Printronix conducts its foreign and domestic operations using leased facilities under non-cancelable operating leases that expire at various dates through 2026. Printronix's principal executive office is located in Irvine, California, under a lease agreement that expires in 2026. Printronix has a manufacturing site located in Malaysia and third-party configuration sites located in the United States, Singapore and Holland, along with sales and support locations around the world to support its global network of users, channel partners and strategic alliances. We believe that Printronix’s facilities are adequate, suitable and of sufficient capacity to support its immediate needs. Refer to Note 15 to the consolidated financial statements elsewhere herein for additional information.
Energy Operations
The following discussion of our Energy Operations properties should be read in conjunction with the accompanying audited consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Please see the section entitled “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations and Financial Condition - Results of Operations” for information on our production, prices, and production cost.
Our Energy Operations Business consists of the Company’s approximately 73.5% interest in Benchmark. Benchmark’s current position is concentrated in the Anadarko Basin region of Western Oklahoma and the Texas panhandle, where it has a production base comprising approximately 156,000 net acres located primarily in Ellis and Roger Mills counties, Oklahoma and Lipscomb, Hemphill, Ochiltree and Roberts counties, Texas. Within its operating areas, Benchmark’s assets are prospective for multiple formations, most notably the Cleveland, Granite Wash and Cherokee formations. As of December 31, 2024, Benchmark’s operated assets consisted of 551 gross (472 net) operated wells, and its non-operated assets consisted of an average working interest of 13% in 64 gross (8 net) wells including the assets acquired in the Revolution Transaction (as defined below). Production from Benchmark’s operated and non-operated wells during the year ended December 31, 2024 totaled 1,680 Mboe, or an average of 4.6 Mboe per day.
The following table presents certain production and operating information for Benchmark as of or for the year ended December 31, 2024, as applicable.
As of December 31, 2024
Productive
Wells(1)
Average Daily Production(2)
Estimated Proved Reserves(3)
Total
Net
Acreage Gross Net (Boe/d) (Mboe)
Texas/Oklahoma
Anadarko Basin 155,861 615 480 4,601 25,279
_________________________
(1)Benchmark’s operated and non-operated productive wells.
(2)Represents the average daily production for the year ended December 31, 2024 from Benchmark’s operated and non-operated producing wells.
(3)In connection with our investment in Benchmark in November 2023 and Benchmark’s subsequent acquisition of the Revolution assets in 2024, we commenced an evaluation of the development potential of Benchmark’s unproved properties. Benchmark had not adopted a long-term development plan as of December 31, 2024 or 2023 and, in accordance with SEC rules, its unproved and unevaluated properties could not be classified as having proved undeveloped reserves for such periods. As a result, Benchmark’s estimated net proved reserves at December 31, 2024 consist entirely of proved developed reserves.
Oil and Natural Gas Reserves
Summary of Net Proved Reserves
The table below presents Benchmark’s estimated net proved reserves for the periods indicated based on reports prepared by Cawley, Gillespie & Associates (“CGA”), Benchmark’s third-party independent reserve engineers. In preparing its reports, CGA evaluated properties representing all of Benchmark’s proved developed reserves at December 31, 2024 and 2023 in accordance with current SEC rules and regulations regarding oil and natural gas reserve reporting. Benchmark’s proved developed reserves accounted for 100% of its total proved reserves for such periods. The estimated reserves shown are for proved reserves only and do not include any unproved reserves classified as probable or possible reserves that might exist
for Benchmark’s properties, nor do they include any consideration that could be attributable to interests in unproved and unevaluated acreage beyond those tracts for which proved reserves have been estimated.
Estimated Reserves at SEC Pricing(1)
December 31,
2024 2023
Estimated Proved Reserves:
Crude Oil (MBbls) 5,315 361
NGLs (MBbls) 68,110 18,444
Natural gas (MMcf) 8,613 1,156
Total (MBoe) 25,279 4,591
Percent Proved Developed(2)
100 % 100 %
Estimated Proved Developed Reserves:
Crude Oil (MBbls)
Producing 5,134 251
Non-Producing 181 110
Total 5,315 361
Natural gas (MMcf)
Producing 66,173 14,119
Non-Producing 1,937 4,325
Total 68,110 18,444
NGLs (MBbls)
Producing 8,373 924
Non-Producing 240 232
Total 8,613 1,156
Total Proved Developed Reserves (MBoe)(2)
25,279 4,591
Estimated Proved Undeveloped Reserves:
Total Proved Undeveloped Reserves (MBoe)(2)
- -
_________________________
(1)Prices for natural gas, oil and NGLs, respectively, used in preparing Benchmark’s estimated proved reserves based on SEC rules and regulations regarding oil and natural gas reserve reporting (i) at December 31, 2024 were $72.01 per Bbl for crude oil, $0.86 per Mcf for natural gas and $25.16 per Bbl for NGLs, and (ii) at December 31, 2023 were $75.73 per Bbl for crude oil, $1.65 per Mcf for natural gas and $28.16 per Bbl for NGLs.
(2)In connection with our investment in Benchmark in November 2023 and Benchmark’s subsequent acquisition of the Revolutions assets in 2024, we commenced an evaluation of the development potential of Benchmark’s undrilled assets. Benchmark had not adopted a long-term development plan as of December 31, 2024 or 2023 and, in accordance with SEC rules, its undrilled assets could not be classified as having proved undeveloped reserves for such periods. As a result, Benchmark’s estimated net proved reserves at December 31, 2024 and 2023 consist entirely of proved developed reserves.
Changes in Proved Reserves
The following table summarizes changes in our estimated proved reserves at December 31, 2024:
Proved
Reserves(1)
(MBoe)
Balance at December 31, 2023 4,591
Production (1,680)
Revisions of previous estimates (298)
Purchase of reserves 22,666
Balance at December 31, 2024 25,279
_________________________
(1)Benchmark’s estimated net proved reserves at December 31, 2024 and 2023 consist entirely of proved developed reserves.
Benchmark’s estimated proved reserves increased 451% from 4,591 MBoe at December 31, 2023 to 25,279 MBoe at December 31, 2024. This increase in proved reserves was primarily attributable to the Revolution Acquisition in April 2024, which increased our proved reserves by 22,666 Mboe during 2024. This increase was partially offset by production in 2024 of 1,680 Mboe, as well as net downward revisions of prior estimates for proved reserves of 298 Mboe. 789 Mboe of the downward revisions are due to price decreases in the trailing 12-month averages for oil, gas and NGLs that was partially offset by 491 Mboe of positive revisions due to the performance of our wells due to the positive impact of our 2024 worker programs.
Standardized Measure
The following table sets forth the standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows (the “Standardized Measure”) of Benchmark proved reserves as of the period presented. The Standardized Measure represents the present value of estimated future net cash flows from proved reserves, less estimated future development, production, plugging and abandonment costs and income tax expenses, discounted at 10% to reflect the timing of future cash flows. The Standardized Measure is not an estimate of the fair market value of Benchmark’s properties. Refer to the Unaudited Supplemental Information on Oil and Natural Gas Properties included elsewhere in this Annual Report for additional discussion of the Standardized Measure and changes thereto:
December 31, 2024
(in thousands)
Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows $166,159
Independent Petroleum Engineers
We have engaged CGA to independently certify our estimated net proved reserves. CGA is a reservoir-evaluation consulting firm who evaluates oil and natural gas properties and independently certifies petroleum reserves quantities. CGA was founded in 1961 and performs consulting petroleum engineering services under Texas Board of Professional Engineers Registration No.. Within CGA, the technical expert primarily responsible for certifying the estimates set forth in the CGA 2024 Reserve Report is Mr. Todd Brooker, a Licensed Professional Engineer in the State of Texas (No. 83462), has been practicing consulting petroleum engineering at CGA since 1992 and has over 35 years of industry experience. He graduated with honors from the University of Texas at Austin in 1989 with a Bachelor of Science Degree in Petroleum Engineering. Mr. Brooker meets or exceeds the education, training, and experience requirements set forth in the Standards Pertaining to the Estimating and Auditing of Oil and Gas Reserves Information promulgated by the Society of Petroleum Engineers; he is proficient in judiciously applying industry standard practices to engineering and geoscience evaluations as well as applying SEC and other industry reserves definitions and guidelines. He is a member of the Society of Petroleum Engineers and Society of Petroleum Evaluation Engineers.
In accordance with applicable requirements of the SEC, estimates of our net proved reserves and future net revenues are made using average prices at the beginning of each month in the 12-month period prior to the date of such reserve estimates and are held constant throughout the life of the properties (except to the extent a contract specifically provides for escalation).
The reserves set forth in CGA’s reports for Benchmark’s properties are estimated by performance methods or analogy. In general, reserves attributable to producing were based on a combination of forecasting methods including decline curve analysis regional type curve analysis and analogy to offset production. Certain new producing properties were forecast using a combination of production performance and analogy to similar production, both of which are considered to provide a relatively high degree of accuracy. Non-producing and behind pipe reserve estimates were forecast using either production performance, volumetric or analogy methods, or a combination of each. These methods provide a relatively high degree of accuracy for predicting proved developed non-producing and proved developed behind pipe reserves due to the mature nature of their properties targeted for development and an abundance of subsurface control data. CGA concluded that the assumptions, data, methods and procedures used in connection with its reports were appropriate for the purpose served by its reports.
The estimates of the reserves, future production, and income attributable to our oil and natural gas properties are prepared using widely industry-accepted petroleum economic software packages, as well as CGA’s own proprietary petroleum economic software.
To estimate economically recoverable oil and natural gas reserves and related future net cash flows, Cawley considers many factors and assumptions including, but not limited to, the use of reservoir parameters derived from geological, geophysical and engineering data which cannot be measured directly, economic criteria based on current costs and SEC pricing requirements, and forecasts of future production rates. Under the SEC regulations 210.4-10(a)(22)(v) and (26), proved reserves must be demonstrated to be economically producible based on existing economic conditions including the prices and costs at which economic productivity from a reservoir is to be determined as of the effective date of the report. With respect to the property interests we own, production and well tests from examined wells, normal direct costs of operating the wells or leases, other costs such as transportation and/or processing fees, production taxes, recompletion and development costs and product prices are based on the SEC regulations, geological maps, well logs, core analyses, and pressure measurements.
The reserve data set forth in the CGA reports represent only estimates and should not be construed as being exact quantities. They may or may not be actually recovered, and if recovered, the actual revenues and costs could be more or less than the estimated amounts. Moreover, estimates of reserves may increase or decrease as a result of future operations.
Reservoir engineering is a subjective process of estimating underground accumulations of oil and natural gas that cannot be measured in an exact manner. There are numerous uncertainties inherent in estimating oil and natural gas reserves and their estimated values, including many factors beyond our control. The accuracy of any reserve estimate is a function of the quality of available data and of engineering and geologic interpretation and judgment. As a result, estimates of different engineers, including those used by us, may vary. In addition, estimates of reserves are subject to revision based upon actual production, results of future development and exploration activities, prevailing oil and natural gas prices, operating costs and other factors. The revisions may be material. Accordingly, reserve estimates are often different from the quantities of oil and natural gas that are ultimately recovered and are highly dependent upon the accuracy of the assumptions upon which they are based. See “Risk Factors - Our estimated reserves are based on many assumptions that may prove to be inaccurate. Any material inaccuracies in these reserve estimates or underlying assumptions will materially affect the quantities and present value of our reserves.”
Internal Controls Over Reserves Estimation Process
Benchmark employs an external oil and gas consulting firm to manage the Company’s reservoir engineering. Rachel Henderson (VP of Reservoir Engineering) is responsible for overseeing the internal preparation of our reserves. Rachel received a Bachelor of Science in Biological Engineering with high distinction from the University of Arkansas in 2012 and a Masters of Business Administration from the University of Oklahoma in 2018. Mrs. Henderson has over 12 years of oil and gas experience, with her entire career focused on reservoir engineering.
Benchmark’s reservoir engineering department meets with CGA to review properties and discuss evaluation methods and assumptions used in CGA’s proved reserves estimates, in accordance with Benchmark’s prescribed internal control procedures. Our controls over reserve estimation include engaging and retaining qualified independent petroleum and
geological firms with respect to reserves information. We provide information to our independent reserve engineers about our crude oil, natural gas and NGLs properties which includes, but is not limited to, production profiles, ownership and production sharing rights, prices, costs and future drilling plans. Our independent reserve engineers prepare their own estimates of the reserves attributable to our properties. The reserves estimates for our assets shown herein have been independently evaluated by CGA .
As discussed in Item 9A, “Controls and Procedures,” we concluded our disclosure controls and procedures related to Benchmark were not effective as of December 31, 2024, resulting in a material weakness over financial reporting related to Benchmark. While the material weakness affects systems that provide input into the reserves process, there were no identified material misstatements to our current year financial statements, no restatements of prior period financial statements and no changes in previously released financial results required as a result of these control deficiencies, including to Benchmark’s reserve estimations.
Production, Prices and Production Costs
The price that Benchmark receives for the oil, natural gas and NGLs it produces is largely a function of market supply and demand. Demand has historically been affected by global economic conditions, including recession concerns, conflicts involving oil producing regions, and weather and other seasonal conditions. The following table sets forth Benchmark’s production volumes, average prices received and average production costs during the periods indicated. These amounts represent Benchmark’s historical results of operations without making pro forma adjustments for any acquisitions, divestitures or drilling activity that occurred during the respective years. Due to normal production declines, increases or decreases in drilling activity and the effects of acquisitions or divestitures, the historical information presented below should not be interpreted as being indicative of future results.
Year Ended December 31,
Net Production(1)
Oil (MBbls) 364
Natural gas (MMcf) 4,678
NGLs (MBbls) 536
Total (MBoe)(2)
1,680
Average daily production (Boe/d) 4,601
Average Sales Prices(3)
Oil (per Bbl) $ 72.62
Natural gas (per Mcf) $ 1.97
NGLs (per Bbl) $ 24.30
Average Production Costs(4)
Total (per Boe)(4)
$ 12.29
_________________________
(1)All of Benchmark’s production comes from the Anadarko Basin in Texas and Oklahoma.
(2)Gas reserves are converted to Boe at a rate of six Mcf per Bbl of oil, NGL reserves are converted to a Boe on a one-to-one basis with oil.
(3)Excludes impact of derivative settlements.
(4)Excludes ad valorem taxes and oil and natural gas production taxes.
Drilling and Development Activity
The table below sets forth the number of gross and net productive and non-productive wells in which we owned a working interest drilled in the periods indicated. The number of wells drilled refers to the number of wells completed at any time during the period, regardless of when drilling was initiated.
Year Ended December 31, 2024
Gross Net
Exploratory wells
Productive 1.0 0.80
Development wells
Productive(1)
11.0 0.40
Total wells 12.0 1.20
________________________
(1)Represents non-operated wells in which Benchmark holds a working interest.
At December 31, 2024, we did not have any development wells or exploration wells in the process of being drilled, being completed or awaiting completion operations.
Productive Wells
The following table presents information relating to Benchmark’s productive wells as of December 31, 2024. Wells are classified as oil wells or natural gas wells according to their predominant production stream. As of December 31, 2024 Benchmark had an approximate average working interest of 85.8% in all wells that it operated and an approximate average working interest of 13% in wells that it does not operate. In the table below, gross wells are the total number of producing wells in which Benchmark owns a working interest and net wells represent the total of Benchmark’s fractional working interests owned in the gross wells.
Oil Wells Natural Gas Wells Total Wells
Gross Net Gross Net Gross Net
Anadarko Basin
Operated Wells 245 205 306 267 551 472
Non-Operated Wells 42 4 22 4 64 8
Total 287 209 328 271 615 480
Acreage
The following table summarizes Benchmark’s estimated gross and net developed and undeveloped acreage as of December 31, 2024.
Developed Acreage Undeveloped Acreage(1)
Total Acreage
(in thousands) Gross Net Gross Net Gross Net
Anadarko Basin 1,151 148 122 8 1,273 156
_________________________
(1)Represents acreage that is not allocated or assignable to productive wells.
Acreage Expirations
As a non-operator, we are subject to lease expirations if an operator does not commence the development of operations within the agreed terms of our leases. Our leases for undeveloped acreage will expire at the end of their respective primary terms, unless we renew the existing leases, establish commercial production from the acreage or some other “savings clause” is exercised. In addition, our leases typically provide that the lease does not expire at the end of the primary term if
drilling operations have been commenced. While we generally expect to establish production from most of our acreage prior to expiration of the applicable lease terms, there can be no guarantee they can do so.
Manufacturing Operations
Deflecto’s primary corporate and manufacturing offices are located in Indianapolis. Deflecto conducts its foreign and domestic operations using leased facilities under non-cancelable operating leases that expire at various dates through 2031. Deflecto leases other warehouses and manufacturing sites located in the United States, United Kingdom, Canada and China. We believe that Deflecto’s facilities are adequate, suitable and of sufficient capacity to support its immediate needs.

---

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
In the ordinary course of business, we or our various businesses and operations are the subject of, or party to, various pending or threatened legal actions, including various counterclaims in connection with patent enforcement activities. We believe that any liability arising from these actions will not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, operational results or cash flow. For information regarding certain pending litigation, see Note 15 to our consolidated financial statements.
Intellectual Property Operations
Our Intellectual Property Operations Business is often required to engage in litigation to enforce its patents and patent rights. Certain of its operating subsidiaries are parties to ongoing patent enforcement related litigation, alleging infringement by third parties of certain of the patented technologies owned or controlled by its operating subsidiaries.
In connection with any of its patent enforcement actions, it is possible that a defendant may claim and/or a court may rule that our Intellectual Property Operations Business has violated statutory authority, regulatory authority, federal rules, local court rules, or governing standards relating to the substantive or procedural aspects of such enforcement actions. In such event, a court may issue monetary sanctions against it or its operating subsidiaries or award attorney’s fees and/or expenses to a defendant(s), which could be material, and if required to be paid by it or its operating subsidiaries, could materially harm its operating results and its financial position.
Our Intellectual Property Operations Business spends a significant amount of its financial and management resources to pursue its current litigation matters. These litigation matters and others that it may in the future determine to pursue could continue for years and continue to consume significant financial and management resources. The counterparties to its litigation matters are sometimes large, well-financed companies with substantially greater resources. We cannot assure you that any of our Intellectual Property Operations Business current or future litigation matters will result in a favorable outcome for it. In addition, in part due to the appeals process and other legal processes, even if our Intellectual Property Operations Business obtains favorable interim rulings or verdicts in particular litigation matters, they may not be predictive of the ultimate resolution of the dispute. Also, we cannot assure you that our Intellectual Property Operations Business will not be exposed to claims or sanctions against it which may be costly or impossible for it to defend. Unfavorable or adverse outcomes may result in losses, exhaustion of financial resources or other adverse effects which could encumber our Intellectual Property Operations Business’s ability to effectively and efficiently monetize its assets. Refer to Note 15 to the consolidated financial statements elsewhere herein for additional information related to current legal proceedings.

---

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURE
ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
None.
PART II

---

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
Market Information
Our common stock trades on The Nasdaq Global Select Market under the symbol “ACTG.”
Holders of Common Stock
On March 12, 2025, there were 52 owners of record of our common stock. The foregoing does not include the number of shareholders whose shares are nominally held by banks, brokerage houses or other institutions, but includes each such institution as one record holder.
Dividend Policy
The current policy of our board of directors is to retain earnings, if any, to provide for our growth. Consequently, we do not expect to pay any cash dividends in the foreseeable future. Further, there can be no assurance that our proposed operations will generate revenues and cash flow needed to declare any future cash dividends or that we will have legally available funds to pay future dividends.
The decision to institute a dividend is at the discretion of, and rests with Acacia’s Board of Directors.
Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans
Information required by this item is incorporated by reference to our Definitive Proxy Statement for our 2025 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities
None.
Stock Repurchases
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities (1)
Total Number
of Shares
Purchased Average
Price
Paid per
Share Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs Approximate Dollar
Value of Shares that
May Yet be Purchased
under the Program
(In thousands)
October 1, 2024 - October 31, 2024 1,175,872 $ 4.64 1,175,872 $ 7,310
November 1, 2024 - November 30, 2024 798,398 $ 4.50 798,398 $ 3,721
December 3, 2024 - December 31, 2024 846,969 $ 4.50 846,969 $ -
Total repurchases in the quarter 2,821,239 $ 4.56 2,821,239
(1) On November 9, 2023, the Board approved a stock repurchase program (the “Repurchase Program”) for up to $20.0 million of the Company’s common stock, subject to a cap of 5,800,000 shares of common stock. The Repurchase Program has no time limit and does not require the repurchase of a minimum number of shares. The common stock may be repurchased on the open market, in block trades, or in privately negotiated transactions, including under plans complying with the provisions of Rule 10b5-1 and Rule 10b-18 of the Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Under the Repurchase Program as of December 31, 2024, we have repurchased a total of 4,358,361 shares at an average price per share of $4.61,
for a total of $20.0 million. As of December 31, 2024, the Repurchase Program has been completed. Refer to Note 16 to the consolidated financial statements elsewhere herein for additional information.

---

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
ITEM 6. [Reserved]
Not applicable.

---

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report. This discussion contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these “forward-looking statements” as a result of various factors including the risks we discuss in Item 1A. "Risk Factors," and elsewhere herein. For additional information, refer to the section above entitled “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements.”
General
We are a disciplined value-oriented acquirer and operator of businesses across public and private markets and industries including, but not limited to, the industrial, energy and technology sectors. We acquire businesses with a view towards strong free cash flow generation and an ability to scale, and look to identify opportunities where we can tap into our deep industry relationships, significant capital base, and transaction expertise to materially improve performance. Our strategy centers around quality sourcing, execution, and improvement. We find unique situations, bring a flexible and creative approach to transacting, and rely on our relationships and expertise to drive continual improvement in operating performance. We approach transactions as business owners and operators rather than purely as financial investors, and we believe this is our core differentiator for creating long-term value for shareholders and partners. We define value through free cash flow generation, book value appreciation, and stock price growth. These are the pillars of the Acacia story.
Acacia creates value by building relationships and providing transaction expertise to create acquisition opportunities where we can meaningfully improve performance. We focus on identifying, pursuing and acquiring businesses where we are uniquely positioned to deploy our differentiated strategy, people and processes to generate and compound shareholder value. We have a wide range of transactional and operational capabilities to realize the intrinsic value of the businesses that we acquire. Our ideal transactions include the acquisition of public or private companies, the acquisition of divisions of other companies, or structured transactions that can result in the recapitalization or restructuring of the ownership of a business to enhance value.
We are particularly attracted to complex situations where we believe value is not fully recognized, the value of certain operations is masked by a diversified business mix, or where private ownership has not invested the capital and/or resources necessary to support long-term value. Through our public market activities, we aim to initiate strategic block positions in public companies as a path to complete whole company acquisitions or strategic transactions that unlock value. We believe this business model is differentiated from private equity funds, which do not typically own public securities prior to acquiring companies, hedge funds, which do not typically acquire entire businesses, and other acquisition vehicles such as special purpose acquisition companies, which are narrowly focused on completing one singular, defining acquisition.
Our focus is companies with a total enterprise value of $1 billion or less. However, we may pursue larger acquisitions under the right circumstances. Broadly speaking, our potential acquisition targets are founder-owned or privately controlled businesses, entire public companies or carve-outs of specific segments, which show a path to consistent profitability, free cash flow generation and higher risk-adjusted return expectations. We buy businesses to create platforms. The Company remains focused on acquiring and building businesses that have stable cash flow generation with an ability to scale, while retaining the flexibility to make opportunistic acquisitions with high risk-adjusted return characteristics. Acacia then has optionality to grow and reinvest free cash flow or look to monetize and build new platforms.
We believe the Company has the potential to develop advantaged opportunities due to its:
•experienced management team, which has spearheaded robust book value per share growth, with compensation tied to this metric to ensure alignment with shareholders;
•disciplined focus on identifying opportunities where the Company can be an advantaged buyer, initiate a transaction opportunity spontaneously, avoid a traditional sale process and complete the purchase of a business, division or other asset at an attractive price;
•deep and experienced operating executive network which supports sourcing and evaluation of acquisition opportunities;
•significant resources and the flexibility to take advantage of uncertain environments and dislocated situations;
•willingness to invest across industries and in off-the-run, often misunderstood assets that suffer from a complexity discount;
•relationships and partnership abilities across functions and sectors; and
•strong expertise in corporate governance and operational transformation.
We regularly evaluate opportunities to acquire new businesses, where our research, execution and operating partners can drive attractive earnings and book value per share growth. Our long-term focus positions our businesses to navigate economic cycles and allows sellers and other counterparties to have confidence that a transaction is not dependent on achieving the types of performance hurdles demanded by private equity sponsors. We consider opportunities based on the attractiveness of the underlying cash flows, without regard to a specific fund life or investment horizon.
People, Process and Performance
Our Company is built on the principles of People, Process and Performance. We have built a management team with demonstrated expertise in Research, Transactions and Execution, and Operations and Management of our targeted acquisitions. We believe our priorities and skills underpin a compelling value proposition for operating businesses, partners and future acquisition targets, including:
•the flexibility to consummate transactions using financing structures suited to the opportunity and involving third-party transaction structuring as needed;
•the ability to deliver ongoing financial and strategic support; and
•the financial capacity to maintain a long-term outlook and remain committed to a multi-year business plan.
Relationship with Starboard Value, LP
Our strategic relationship with Starboard enhances our access to operating partners and industry experts with whom we evaluate potential acquisition opportunities, which enhances the oversight and value creation of our businesses. Starboard has provided, and we expect will continue to provide, ready access to its extensive network of industry executives and, as part of our relationship, Starboard has assisted, and we expect will continue to assist, with sourcing and evaluating appropriate acquisition opportunities.
Intellectual Property Operations
The Company through its Patent Licensing, Enforcement and Technologies Business invests in IP and engages in the licensing and enforcement of patented technologies. Through our Patent Licensing, Enforcement and Technologies Business, operated under our wholly owned subsidiary, Acacia Research Group, LLC, and its wholly-owned subsidiaries (collectively, “ARG”), we are a principal in the licensing and enforcement of patent portfolios, with our operating subsidiaries obtaining the rights in the patent portfolio or purchasing the patent portfolio outright. On a consolidated basis, we currently own or control the rights to multiple patent portfolios, including U.S. patents and certain foreign counterparts, which cover technologies used in a variety of industries. We generate revenues and related cash flows from the granting of IP rights for the use of patented technologies that our operating subsidiaries control or own. While we partner from time to time with inventors and patent owners, ranging in size and including large corporations, we control and assume all responsibility in pursuing patent licensing and enforcement programs, and for the related operating expenses. When applicable, share licensing revenue, net of costs, with our patent partners after we have achieved our agreed upon minimum return threshold. We may also provide upfront capital to patent owners as an advance against future licensing revenue.
Currently, on a consolidated basis, our operating subsidiaries own or control the rights to multiple patent portfolios, which include U.S. patents and certain foreign counterparts, covering technologies used in a variety of industries. Our current active patent portfolios are: our Atlas Technologies portfolio, which covers Wi-Fi 6 standard essential patents, our Unification Technologies portfolio, which covers flash memory technology; our Monarch Networking Technologies portfolio, which covers IP networking technology; our Stingray IP Solutions portfolio, which covers wireless networking; and our R2 Solutions portfolio, which covers internet search, advertising and cloud computing technology.
We have established a proven track record of licensing and enforcement success with over 1,600 license agreements executed as of December 31, 2024, across nearly 200 patent portfolio licensing and enforcement programs. As of December 31, 2024, we have generated gross licensing revenue of approximately $1.9 billion, and have returned $881.0 million to our patent partners. During the past five calendar years ending on December 31, 2024, we generated gross licensing revenue of approximately $234.0 million and returned approximately $91.2 million to our patent partners.
As attractive opportunities become available, we remain open to opportunistically deploying additional capital into the IP business in the future, consistent with our mission to maximize value for shareholders. Our team is made up of well-respected leaders in the IP space, and intellectual property owners actively seek us out as a partner.
For more information related to our Intellectual Property Operations, refer to additional detailed patent business discussion below.
Industrial Operations
In October 2021, we acquired Printronix Holding Corp. (“Printronix”). Printronix is a leading manufacturer and distributor of industrial impact printers, also known as line matrix printers, and related consumables and services. The Printronix business serves a diverse group of customers that operate across healthcare, food and beverage, manufacturing and logistics, and other sectors. This mature technology is known for its ability to operate in hazardous environments. Printronix has a manufacturing site located in Malaysia and third-party configuration sites located in the United States, Singapore and Holland, along with sales and support locations around the world to support its global network of users, channel partners and strategic alliances. This acquisition was made at what we believe to be an attractive purchase price, and we are now supporting existing management in its initiative to reduce costs and operate more efficiently and in its execution of strategic partnerships to generate growth.
We are supporting Printronix as it transitions its business mix from lower-margin printer sales to higher-margin consumable products including ink cartridges and specialty ribbons. Printronix’s dual hardware and consumables business model, combined with a streamlined operating structure, represents a steady source of cash flow for Acacia. The Printronix team is focused on topline initiatives and reducing G&A, and we expect Printronix to continue to generate free cash flow on an annual basis.
For more information related to our Industrial Operations, refer to the section entitled “Industrial Operations Business” below.
Energy Operations
In November 2023, we acquired a 50.4% equity interest in Benchmark. Headquartered in Austin, Texas, Benchmark is an independent oil and gas company that acquires, produces and develops oil and gas assets in Texas and Oklahoma. Benchmark is run by an experienced management team led by Chief Executive Officer Kirk Goehring. Prior to Benchmark’s acquisition of additional assets in April 2024, Benchmark’s assets consisted of over 13,000 net acres primarily located in Roberts and Hemphill Counties in Texas, and an interest in over 125 wells, the majority of which are operated. Acacia made a control investment in Benchmark and intends to utilize its significant capital base to acquire predictable and shallow decline, cash-flowing oil and gas properties whose value can be enhanced via a disciplined, field optimization strategy, with risk managed through robust commodity hedges and low leverage. Through its investment in Benchmark, the Company, along with the Benchmark management team, will evaluate future growth and acquisitions of oil and gas assets at attractive valuations. The Company’s consolidated financial statements include Benchmark’s consolidated operations from November 13, 2023 through December 31, 2024. Refer to Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements elsewhere herein for additional information.
On April 17, 2024, Benchmark consummated the Revolution Transaction contemplated in the Revolution Purchase Agreement. Pursuant to the Revolution Purchase Agreement, Benchmark acquired certain upstream assets and related facilities in Texas and Oklahoma, including approximately 140,000 net acres and an interest in approximately 470 operated producing wells for a purchase price of $145 million in cash, subject to customary post-closing adjustments. The Company’s contribution to Benchmark to fund its portion of the Revolution Purchase Price and related fees was $59.9 million, which was funded from cash on hand. The remainder of the Revolution Purchase Price was funded by a combination of borrowings under the Benchmark Revolving Credit Facility and a cash contribution of $15.25 million from other investors in Benchmark, including McArron Partners. Following closing of the Revolution Transaction, the
Company’s interest in Benchmark is approximately 73.5%. Refer to Note 11 to the accompanying consolidated financial statements for additional information regarding the Benchmark Revolving Credit Facility.
For more information, refer to the section entitled “Energy Operations Business” below.
Manufacturing Operations
On October 18, 2024, Deflecto Holdco LLC (“Deflecto Purchaser”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Acacia, acquired Deflecto Acquisition, Inc. (“Deflecto”), pursuant to that certain Stock Purchase Agreement (the “Deflecto Stock Purchase Agreement”) entered into on the same day with Deflecto Holdings, LLC and Evriholder Finance LLC (collectively, the “Deflecto Sellers”), Deflecto and the Sellers’ Representative named therein. Pursuant to the Deflecto Stock Purchase Agreement, Deflecto Purchaser purchased all of the issued and outstanding equity interests of Deflecto, upon the terms and subject to the conditions of the Deflecto Stock Purchase Agreement (such purchase and sale, together with the other transactions contemplated by the Deflecto Stock Purchase Agreement, the “Deflecto Transaction”). Headquartered in Indianapolis, Indiana, Deflecto is a leading specialty manufacturer of essential products serving the commercial transportation, HVAC, and office markets. The Deflecto Transaction closed simultaneously with the execution of the Deflecto Stock Purchase Agreement on October 18, 2024. Under the terms and conditions of the Deflecto Stock Purchase Agreement, the aggregate consideration paid to the Deflecto Sellers in the Deflecto Transaction consisted of $103.7 million, subject to certain working capital, debt and other customary adjustments set forth in the Stock Purchase Agreement (the “Deflecto Purchase Price”). The Deflecto Purchase Price was funded with a combination of borrowings of a $48.0 million secured term loan (the “Deflecto Term Loan”) and cash on hand. A portion of the Deflecto Purchase Price is being held in escrow to indemnify Deflecto Purchaser against certain claims, losses and liabilities. The Company’s consolidated financial statements include Deflecto’s consolidated operations from October 18, 2024 through December 31, 2024. Refer to Notes 3 and 11 to the consolidated financial statements elsewhere herein for additional information regarding the acquisition and the Deflecto Term Loan.
In October 2024, we acquired Deflecto. Headquartered in Indianapolis, Indiana, Deflecto is a leading specialty manufacturer of essential products serving the commercial transportation, HVAC and office markets. Under Acacia’s ownership, Deflecto is a market leader across each of its segments and end markets, supplying essential, regulatory mandated products to a blue-chip customer base via long-term relationships with more than 1,500 leading retail, wholesale and OEM customers and distribution partners globally. Its products include emergency warning triangles and vehicle mudguards used by the transportation industry, various airducts and air registers used by the HVAC market and literature, sign holders and floormats used by the office market. Deflecto manufactures its products at nine manufacturing facilities across the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom and China.
For more information, refer to the section entitled “Manufacturing Operations” below.
Recent Business Developments and Trends
Business Strategy
We intend to grow our Company by acquiring additional operating businesses, energy assets and intellectual property assets. However, we may not complete any acquisitions, and any acquisitions that we complete will be costly and could negatively affect our results of operations, and dilute our stockholders’ ownership, or cause us to incur significant expense, and we may not realize the expected benefits of acquisitions.
Recent Acquisitions
In November 2023, we invested $10.0 million to acquire a 50.4% equity interest in Benchmark. Headquartered in Austin, Texas, Benchmark is an independent oil and gas company engaged in the acquisition, production and development of oil and gas assets in mature resource plays in Texas and Oklahoma.
On April 17, 2024, Benchmark consummated the Revolution Transaction contemplated in the Revolution Purchase Agreement pursuant to which Benchmark acquired certain upstream assets and related facilities in Texas and Oklahoma, including approximately 140,000 net acres and an interest in approximately 470 operated producing wells, for a purchase price of $145 million in cash, subject to customary post-closing adjustments (as described further in Note 1 to the accompanying consolidated financial statements). Following closing, the Company’s interest in Benchmark is approximately 73.5%.
On October 18, 2024, Deflecto Purchaser, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Acacia, acquired Deflecto. Headquartered in Indianapolis, Indiana, Deflecto is a leading specialty manufacturer of essential products serving the commercial transportation, HVAC and office markets. Under the terms and conditions of the Deflecto Stock Purchase Agreement, the aggregate consideration paid to the sellers in the Deflecto Transaction consisted of $103.7 million, subject to certain working capital, debt and other customary adjustments set forth in the Deflecto Stock Purchase Agreement. The Deflecto Purchase Price was funded with a combination of borrowings of a $48.0 million secured term loan and cash on hand. A portion of the Deflecto Purchase Price is being held in escrow to indemnify Purchaser against certain claims, losses and liabilities. Refer to Note 1 to the accompanying consolidated financial statements for additional information.
Life Sciences Portfolio
In June 2020 we acquired a portfolio of investments in 18 public and private life sciences companies (the “Life Sciences Portfolio”). That purchase was funded with a combination of available cash and capital from Starboard, for a total of approximately $282.0 million at the time of acquisition. Through the end of December 31, 2024, we have received proceeds of $564.1 million as we monetized the Life Sciences portfolio. We retained an investment in the Life Sciences Portfolio consisting of public and private securities valued at $25.7 million at December 31, 2024. On January 19, 2024, we completed the sale of our 33,023,210 shares of Arix Bioscience PLC (“Arix”) to RTW Biotech Opportunities Operating Ltd, a subsidiary of RTW Biotech Opportunities Ltd, for $57.1 million in aggregate (representing £1.43 per share at an exchange rate of 1.2087 USD/GBP). Following the completion of the share sale, we no longer own any shares of Arix. Additionally, some of the businesses in which we continue to hold an interest generate income through the receipt of royalties and milestone payments. Refer to Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements elsewhere herein for more information.
Inflation
Historically, inflation has not had a significant impact on us or any of our subsidiaries. Our Manufacturing and Industrial Operations will continue to adjust their selling prices as required in response to higher costs and may also implement cost rationalization measures, as applicable. Additionally, our Energy Operations Business may experience inflation. The oil and natural gas industry and the broader U.S. economy have experienced higher than expected inflationary pressures in recent years related to increases in oil and natural gas prices, continued supply chain disruptions, labor shortages and geopolitical instability, among other pressures.
Patent Licensing and Enforcement
Patent Litigation Trial Dates and Related Trials
As of the date of this Annual Report, our Patent Licensing, Enforcement and Technologies Business has two pending patent infringement case with scheduled trial dates in the next twelve months. Patent infringement trials are components of its overall patent licensing process and are one of many factors that contribute to possible future revenue generating opportunities. Scheduled trial dates, as promulgated by the respective court, merely provide an indication of when, in future periods, the trials may occur according to the court’s scheduling calendar at a specific point in time. A court may change previously scheduled trial dates. In fact, courts often reschedule trial dates for various reasons that are unrelated to the underlying patent assets and typically for reasons that are beyond the control of our Patent Licensing, Enforcement and Technologies Business. While scheduled trial dates provide an indication of the timing of possible future revenue generating opportunities, the trials themselves and the immediately preceding periods represent the possible future revenue generating opportunities. Refer to Item 1A “Risk Factors - Risks Related to our Intellectual Property Business and Industry” of this Annual Report for additional information regarding patent litigation and related risks.
Litigation and Licensing Expense
We expect patent-related legal expenses to continue to fluctuate from period to period based on the factors summarized herein, in connection with future trial dates, international enforcement, strategic patent portfolio prosecution and our current and future patent portfolio investment, prosecution, licensing and enforcement activities. Refer to Item 1A “Risk Factors” of this Annual Report for additional information regarding litigation and licensing expense risk.
Investments in Patent Portfolios
With respect to our licensing, enforcement and overall business, neither we nor our operating subsidiaries invent new technologies or products; rather, we depend upon the identification and investment in patents, inventions and companies that own IP through our relationships with inventors, universities, research institutions, technology companies and others. If our operating subsidiaries are unable to maintain those relationships and identify and grow new relationships, then we may not be able to identify new technology-based patent opportunities for sustainable revenue and /or revenue growth.
Our current or future relationships may not provide the volume or quality of technologies necessary to sustain our licensing, enforcement and overall business. In some cases, universities and other technology sources compete against us as they seek to develop and commercialize technologies. Universities may receive financing for basic research in exchange for the exclusive right to commercialize resulting inventions. These and other strategies employed by potential partners may reduce the number of technology sources and potential clients to whom we can market our solutions. If we are unable to maintain current relationships and sources of technology or to secure new relationships and sources of technology, such inability may have a material adverse effect on our revenues, operating results, financial condition and ability to maintain our licensing and enforcement business.
Patent Portfolio Intake
One of the significant challenges in the intellectual property industry continues to be quality patent intake due to the challenges and complexity associated with the current patent environment.
We did not acquire any new patent portfolios in calendar years 2024, 2023 and 2022. During 2021, we acquired one new patent portfolio consisting of Wi-Fi 6 standard essential patents. In 2020, we acquired five new patent portfolios consisting of (i) flash memory technology, (ii) voice activation and control technology, (iii) wireless networks, (iv) internet search, advertising and cloud computing technology and (v) GPS navigation. The patents and patent rights acquired in 2021 and 2020 have estimated economic useful lives of approximately five years.
Industrial Operations Business
Our Printronix subsidiary is a worldwide leader in multi-technology supply-chain printing solutions for a variety of industries, including auto manufacturing, transportation and logistics, retail distribution, food and beverage distribution, and pharmaceutical distribution. Printronix’s line matrix printers are used for mission critical applications within these industries, including labeling and inventory management, build sheets, invoicing, manifests and bills of lading, and reporting. In China, India and other developing countries in Asia and Africa, our printers are also prevalent in the banking and government sectors. Printronix has manufacturing, configuration and/or distribution sites located in Malaysia, the United States, Singapore, China and the Netherlands, along with sales and support locations around the world to support its global network of users, channel partners, and strategic alliances. Printronix designs and manufactures printers and related consumable products for various industrial printing applications. Printers consist of hardware and embedded software and may be sold with maintenance service agreements, which are serviced by outside contractors. Consumable products include inked ribbons which are used within Printronix’s printers. Printronix’s products are primarily sold through Printronix’s global network of channel partners, such as dealers and distributors, to end-users.
Energy Operations Business
Headquartered in Austin, Texas, Benchmark is an independent oil and gas company that acquires, produces and develops oil and gas assets in Texas and Oklahoma. Benchmark is run by an experienced management team led by Chief Executive Officer Kirk Goehring. After the acquisition of Revolution, Benchmark’s existing assets consist of approximately 156,000 net acres and an interest in approximately 615 wells, the majority of which are operated. Acacia owns approximately 73.5% of Benchmark. Benchmark intends to enhance the value of such assets via a disciplined, field optimization strategy, with risk managed through robust commodity hedges and low leverage. Through its investment in Benchmark, the Company, along with the Benchmark management team, will evaluate future growth and acquisitions of oil and gas assets at attractive valuations.
Manufacturing Operations Business
In October 2024, we acquired Deflecto. Headquartered in Indianapolis, Indiana, Deflecto is a leading specialty manufacturer of essential products serving the commercial transportation, HVAC and office markets. Under Acacia’s ownership, Deflecto is a market leader across each of its segments and end markets, supplying essential, regulatory mandated products to a blue-chip customer base via long-term relationships with more than 1,500 leading retail, wholesale and OEM customers and distribution partners globally. Its products include emergency warning triangles and vehicle mudguards used by the transportation industry, various airducts and air registers used by the HVAC market and literature, sign holders and floormats used by the office market. Deflecto manufactures its products at nine manufacturing facilities across the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom and China
Operating Activities
Intellectual Property Operations
Our Intellectual Property Operations revenues historically have fluctuated quarterly, and can vary significantly period to period, based on several factors including the following:
•the dollar amount of agreements executed each period, which can be driven by the nature and characteristics of the technology or technologies being licensed and the magnitude of infringement associated with a specific licensee;
•the specific terms and conditions of agreements executed each period including the nature and characteristics of rights granted, and the periods of infringement or term of use contemplated by the respective payments;
•fluctuations in the total number of agreements executed each period;
•the number of, timing, results and uncertainties associated with patent licensing negotiations, mediations, patent infringement actions, trial dates and other enforcement proceedings relating to our patent licensing and enforcement programs;
•the relative maturity of licensing programs during the applicable periods;
•other external factors, including the periodic status or results of ongoing negotiations, the status or results of ongoing litigations and appeals, actual or perceived shifts in the regulatory environment, impact of unrelated patent related judicial proceedings and other macroeconomic factors;
•the willingness of prospective licensees to settle significant patent infringement cases and pay reasonable license fees for the use of our patented technology, as such infringement cases approach a court determined trial date; and
•fluctuations in overall patent portfolio related enforcement activities which are impacted by the portfolio intake challenges discussed above.
Our management does not attempt to manage for smooth sequential periodic growth in revenues from period to period, and therefore, periodic results can be uneven. Unlike most operating businesses and industries, licensing revenues not generated in a current period are not necessarily foregone but, depending on whether negotiations, litigation or both continue into subsequent periods, and depending on several other factors, such potential revenues may be pushed into subsequent annual periods.
Industrial Operations
Refer to “Industrial Operations Business” above for information related to Printronix’s operating activities.
Energy Operations
Refer to “Energy Operations Business” above for information related to Benchmark’s operating activities.
Manufacturing Operations
Refer to “Manufacturing Operations Business” above for information related to Deflecto’s operating activities.
In addition to the following results of operations discussion, more information related to our Intellectual Property Operations, Industrial Operations, Energy Operations and Manufacturing Operations segment revenues may be found in Notes 2 and 21 to the consolidated financial statements.
Results of Operations
The results reflected in this section with respect to Deflecto for the year ended December 31, 2024 include results for the period from October 18, 2024 to December 31, 2024 following our acquisition of Deflecto. The results reflected in this section with respect to Benchmark include results for the full year ended December 31, 2024 compared to an approximate two month period ended December 31, 2023 following our acquisition of Benchmark.
Summary of Results of Operations
Years Ended
December 31,
2024 2023 $ Change % Change
(In thousands, except percentage change values)
Total revenues $ 122,312 $ 125,102 $ (2,790) (2 %)
Total costs and expenses 155,238 104,166 51,072 49 %
Operating (loss) income (32,926) 20,936 (53,862) (257 %)
Total other (expense) income (5,221) 46,490 (51,711) (111 %)
(Loss) income before income taxes (38,147) 67,426 (105,573) (157 %)
Income tax benefit 3,449 1,504 1,945 129 %
Net (loss) income attributable to Acacia Research Corporation (36,057) 67,060 (103,117) (154 %)
Results of Operations - year ended December 31, 2024 compared with the year ended December 31, 2023
Total revenues decreased $2.8 million to $122.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2024, as compared to $125.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2023, primarily due to a decrease in our Intellectual Property Operations revenues and a decrease in Industrial Operations revenues, partially offset by revenues contributed from our Energy Operations and our Manufacturing Operations. ARG revenues decreased due to a decrease in the number of license agreements executed and a decrease in average license fees, which contributed to Intellectual Property Operations revenues decreasing by $69.6 million. Refer to “Investments in Patent Portfolios” above for additional information regarding the impact of portfolio acquisition trends on current and future licensing and enforcement related revenues. The decrease in Industrial Operations revenue of $4.7 million is due to lower units of printers sold. Refer to “Industrial Operations - Revenues” below for further detailed discussion. Revenues contributed from Benchmark was $49.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2024, which include post-asset acquisition revenues from Revolution compared to an approximate two month period ended December 31, 2023 revenues from Benchmark. Post-acquisition revenues contributed from Deflecto was $23.2 million for the period from October 18, 2024 to December 31, 2024. Refer to “Energy Operations - Revenues” and “Manufacturing Operations - Revenues” below for further discussion.
Loss before income taxes was $38.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2024, as compared to income before income taxes of $67.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2023. The net decrease was comprised of the change in total revenues described above and other changes in operating expenses and other income or expense for the year ended December 31, 2024 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2023 as follows:
•Inventor royalties increased $706,000, from $1.0 million to $1.7 million in 2024, primarily due to a higher mix of portfolios generating revenue in 2024 with inventor royalties. Refer to “Intellectual Property Operations - Cost of Revenues” below for further discussion.
•Contingent legal fees decreased $8.7 million, from $11.0 million to $2.3 million in 2024, primarily due to the change in Intellectual Property Operations revenues described above. Refer to “Intellectual Property Operations - Cost of Revenues” below for further discussion.
•Litigation and licensing expenses decreased $6.3 million, from $10.8 million to $4.4 million in 2024, primarily due to a net decrease in litigation support expenses associated with ongoing litigation. Refer to “Intellectual Property Operations - Cost of Revenues” below for further discussion.
•Amortization of patents expense from our Intellectual Property Operations increased $4.7 million, from $11.4 million to $16.1 million in 2024, due to an increase in scheduled amortization from our additional preferential future returns paid from our existing patent portfolios. Refer to Note 8 to the consolidated financial statements elsewhere herein for additional information regarding certain patent and patent rights costs related to ARG.
•Printronix cost of sales, engineering and development expenses, and sales and marketing expenses decreased approximately $4.5 million, from $25.7 million to $21.1 million in 2024, primarily due to a decrease in revenue offset by higher margins. Refer to “Industrial Operations - Cost of Revenues” and “Operating Expenses” below for further discussion.
•Benchmark’s cost of production for the year ended December 31, 2024 added a total of $35.6 million to our consolidated operating expenses. Refer to “Energy Operations - Cost of Production” below for further discussion.
•Post-acquisition cost of sales, engineering and development expenses, and sales and marketing expenses from Deflecto for the period from October 18, 2024 to December 31, 2024 added operating expenses in the amount of $18.6 million. Refer to “Manufacturing Operations - Cost of Revenues” below for further discussion.
•General and administrative expenses increased $10.9 million, from $44.4 million to $55.4 million in 2024, primarily due to our Energy Operations which contributed $3.4 million of general and administrative costs in 2024 and our Manufacturing Operations which contributed $4.2 million of post-acquisition general administrative costs from Deflecto for the period from October 18, 2024 through December 31, 2024. In addition, the increase is due to higher parent company and Intellectual Property Operations costs including variable performance-based compensation costs and severance costs, partially offset by a decrease in our Industrial Operations general and administrative costs. Refer to “General and Administrative Expenses” below for further detail and discussion.
•Compensation expense for share-based awards, included in general and administrative expenses above, increased $1.5 million, from $3.3 million to $4.8 million in 2024, primarily due to restricted stock and option grants issued to employees and the Board in 2024 and 2023, which includes a partial offset for forfeitures, and an increase in compensation expense related to PSUs granted in 2023 based on the probability assessment performed as of December 31, 2024. Refer to Note 17 to the consolidated financial statements elsewhere herein for additional information regarding compensation expense.
•Unrealized loss from the change in fair value of our equity securities was $31.4 million in 2024, as compared to an unrealized gain of $31.4 million in the prior year. The unrealized gain and loss were derived from our Life Sciences Portfolio and trading securities portfolio. The 2024 period unrealized loss primarily relates to the reversal of unrealized gains previously recorded for Arix shares sold in January 2024 for realized gains. Refer to Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements elsewhere herein for additional information regarding the sale of Arix shares and refer to “Equity Securities Investments” below for further discussion.
•Realized gain from the sale of equity securities was $28.9 million in 2024, as compared to a realized loss of $10.9 million in the prior year. The realized gains and losses were similarly derived from the sales activity from our Life Sciences Portfolio and trading securities portfolio. The 2024 period realized gains primarily relates to the Arix shares sold in January 2024. Refer to Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements elsewhere herein for additional information regarding the sale of Arix shares and refer to “Equity Securities Investments” below for further discussion.
•Earnings on equity investment in joint venture was zero in 2024, as compared to $4.2 million in the prior year primarily due to the earnings on equity investment in joint venture from one milestone in 2023.
•Non-recurring legacy legal expense of $14.9 million in 2024 is related to the AIP Matter (as defined in Note 15 to the consolidated financial statements elsewhere herein) and expenses related to the settlement agreement with Slingshot (as defined in Note 15 to the consolidated financial statements elsewhere herein). Refer to Note 15 to the consolidated financial statements elsewhere herein for additional information regarding the accrual in connection with the AIP Matter and the settlement agreement with Slingshot.
•Unrealized gain from the Series B Warrants and the embedded derivative fair value measurements was zero in 2024, as compared to a gain of $8.2 million in the prior year, primarily due to the exercise of the remaining Series B Warrants and conversion of the Series A Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock into the Company’s common stock in 2023. In 2024, no shares of Series A Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock and no Series B Warrants remained outstanding. Refer to Notes 12 and 13 to the consolidated financial statements elsewhere herein for additional information regarding the Series B Warrants and Series A Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock and fair value measurements.
•Gain on derivatives was $2.0 million in 2024, as compared to $1.2 million in the prior year due to the commodity derivative activities contributed from our Energy Operations. Refer to Note 13 for additional information regarding Benchmark’s gain on its commodity derivatives.
•Interest expense increased $4.4 million, from $2.1 million to $6.4 million in 2024, primarily due to the interest expense incurred in relation to the Benchmark Revolving Credit Facility and the Deflecto Term Loan. Interest expense from Benchmark Revolving Credit Facility included a full year of interest expense in 2024 compared to an approximate two month period in the prior year and post-acquisition related interest expense contributed to the increase from the Deflecto Term Loan. Refer to Note 11 to the consolidated financial statements elsewhere herein for additional information regarding the Benchmark Revolving Credit Facility and the Deflecto Term Loan. The increase is partially offset by a decrease in interest expense related to the cancellation of the remaining $60.0 million aggregate principal amount outstanding of the Senior Secured Notes on July 13, 2023, pursuant to the Series B Warrants Exercise. Refer to Note 12 to the consolidated financial statements elsewhere herein for additional information regarding the Senior Secured Notes.
•Interest income and other, net increased $2.6 million from $14.4 million to $17.0 million in 2024, primarily due to the increase in interest income from our cash equivalents. Refer to Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements elsewhere herein for additional information regarding our cash and cash equivalents and investments in equity securities.
Intellectual Property Operations
Revenues
ARG’s revenue activity for the periods presented included the following:
Years Ended
December 31,
2024 2023 $ Change % Change
(In thousands, except percentage change values and count totals)
Paid-up license revenue agreements $ 17,253 $ 87,835 $ (70,582) (80 %)
Recurring license revenue agreements 2,272 1,321 951 72 %
Total revenues $ 19,525 $ 89,156 $ (69,631) (78 %)
New license agreements executed 9 16 (7) (44 %)
Licensing and enforcement programs
generating revenues 6 7 (1) (14 %)
For the periods presented above, the majority of the revenue agreements executed during the relevant period provided for the payment of one-time, paid-up license fees in consideration for the grant of certain IP Rights for patented technology owned by our operating subsidiaries. These rights were primarily granted on a perpetual basis, extending until the expiration of the underlying patents. Paid-up revenue decreased $70.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2024 compared to the year ended December 31, 2023 due to a decrease in the number of new license agreements in 2024 and a decrease in average license fees. Recurring revenue, that provides for quarterly sales-based license fees, increased $1.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2024 compared to the year ended December 31, 2023, from various on-going license arrangements.
Refer to Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements elsewhere herein for additional information regarding our revenue arrangements and related concentrations for the periods presented herein.
Refer to “Investments in Patent Portfolios” above for information regarding the impact of portfolio acquisition trends on current and future licensing and enforcement related revenues.
Cost of Revenues
Years Ended
December 31,
2024 2023 $ Change % Change
(In thousands, except percentage change values)
Inventor royalties $ 1,731 $ 1,025 $ 706 69 %
Contingent legal fees 2,285 10,998 (8,713) (79 %)
Litigation and licensing expenses 4,438 10,771 (6,333) (59 %)
Amortization of patents 16,097 11,370 4,727 42 %
Total $ 24,551 $ 34,164 $ (9,613) (28 %)
Refer to detailed change explanations above for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023 regarding cost of revenues for our Intellectual Property Operations.
The economic terms of patent portfolio related partnering agreements and contingent legal fee arrangements, if any, including royalty obligations, if any, royalty rates, contingent fee rates and other terms and conditions, vary across the patent portfolios owned or controlled by our operating subsidiaries. In certain instances, we have invested in certain patent portfolios without future patent partner royalty obligations. The costs associated with the forementioned obligations fluctuate period to period, based on the amount of revenues recognized each period, the terms and conditions of revenue agreements executed each period and the mix of specific patent portfolios, with varying economic terms and conditions, generating revenues each period.
Litigation and licensing expenses include patent-related litigation, enforcement and prosecution costs incurred by law firms and external patent attorneys engaged on either an hourly basis or a contingent fee basis. Litigation and licensing expenses also includes third-party patent research, development, patent prosecution and maintenance fees, re-exam and inter partes reviews, consulting and other costs incurred in connection with the licensing and enforcement of patent portfolios. Refer to “Investments in Patent Portfolios” above for additional information regarding the impact of portfolio acquisition trends on current and future licensing and enforcement related revenues.
Industrial Operations
Revenues
Printronix's net revenues for the periods presented included the following:
Years Ended
December 31,
2024 2023 $ Change % Change
(In thousands, except percentage change value)
Printers and parts $ 10,021 $ 12,513 $ (2,492) (20 %)
Consumable products 17,054 19,091 (2,037) (11 %)
Services 3,346 3,494 (148) (4 %)
Total $ 30,421 $ 35,098 $ (4,677) (13 %)
For the periods presented above, the majority of the contract agreements executed in the relevant period include various combinations of tangible products (which include printers, consumables and parts) and services. Revenue from printers and parts and consumable products for the year ended December 31, 2024 decreased $2.5 million and $2.0 million, respectively compared to the year ended December 31, 2023, due to a decrease in the number of printer units and consumable products sold. Refer to Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements elsewhere herein for additional information regarding Printronix’s revenue arrangements and related concentrations. Refer to “Industrial Operations Business” above for additional information related to Printronix’s operating activities.
Cost of Revenues
Years Ended
December 31,
2024 2023 $ Change % Change
(In thousands, except percentage change values)
Cost of revenues - industrial operations $ 14,912 $ 18,009 $ (3,097) (17 %)
Refer to detailed change explanations above for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023 regarding cost of revenues for our Industrial Operations. The decrease in Printronix's cost of revenues for the year ended December 31, 2024 is due to change in revenue described above. Refer to Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements elsewhere herein for additional information regarding Printronix’s cost of sales.
Energy Operations
Revenues
The following table provides the components of Benchmark’s revenues for the periods indicated, as well as each period’s respective average realized prices and production volumes. This table shows production on a barrel of oil equivalent basis in which natural gas is converted to oil at the ratio of 6 Mcf of natural gas to one barrel of oil. This ratio may not be reflective of the current price ratio between two products.
Year Ended December 31, 2024 November 13, 2023 to December 31, 2023 $ Change % Change
(In thousands, except per unit data and percentage change values)
Production:
Oil (Bbl) 364,464 3,389 361,075 10,654 %
Natural gas (Mcf) 4,678,014 144,949 4,533,065 3,127 %
Natural gas liquids (Bbl) 535,571 9,949 525,622 5,283 %
Total (boe) 1,679,704 158,287 1,521,417 961 %
Average daily production:
Oil (Bbl/d) 999 71 928 1,307 %
Natural gas (Mcf/d) 12,816 3,020 9,796 324 %
Natural gas liquids (Bbl/d) 1,467 207 1,260 609 %
Total (boe/d) 4,601 3,298 1,303 40 %
Revenues:
Oil sales $ 26,468 $ 256 $ 26,212 10,239 %
Natural gas sales 9,194 372 8,822 2,372 %
Natural gas liquids sales 13,014 220 12,794 5,815 %
Other service sales 507 - 507 n/a
Total $ 49,183 $ 848 $ 48,335 5,700 %
Average Price:
Oil (per Bbl) $ 72.62 $ 75.54 $ (2.92) (4) %
Natural gas (per Mcf) $ 1.97 $ 2.57 $ (0.60) (23) %
Natural gas liquids (per Bbl) $ 24.30 $ 22.11 $ 2.19 10 %
Refer to Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements elsewhere herein for additional information regarding Benchmark’s revenue arrangements and related concentrations.
Cost of Production
Benchmark’s cost of production for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023 was $36.3 million and $656,000, respectively. Benchmark’s cost of production figures include the full year ended December 31, 2024 compared to an
approximate two month period ended December 31, 2023 following our acquisition of Benchmark. Refer to Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements elsewhere herein for additional information regarding Benchmark’s cost of production.
Manufacturing Operations
Revenues
Deflecto’s revenues from October 18, 2024 through December 31, 2024 included the following (in thousands):
Air distribution $ 7,782
Safety products 7,977
Office products 7,424
Total $ 23,183
Refer to Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements elsewhere herein for additional information regarding Deflecto’s revenue arrangements and related concentrations.
Cost of Revenues
Deflecto’s cost of revenues from October 18, 2024 through December 31, 2024 was $16.9 million. Refer to Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements elsewhere herein for additional information regarding Deflecto’s cost of revenues.
Operating Expenses
Years Ended
December 31,
2024 2023 $ Change % Change
(In thousands, except percentage change values)
Sales and marketing expenses - industrial operations $ 5,681 $ 6,908 $ (1,227) (18 %)
Sales and marketing expenses - manufacturing operations 1,536 - 1,536 n/a
General and administrative costs - intellectual property operations 8,826 7,402 1,424 19 %
General and administrative costs - industrial operations 8,024 9,457 (1,433) (15 %)
General and administrative costs - energy operations 3,427 264 3,163 1,198 %
General and administrative costs - manufacturing operations 4,767 - 4,767 n/a
Parent general and administrative expenses 30,319 27,306 3,013 11 %
Total general and administrative expenses 55,363 44,429 10,934 25 %
Total $ 62,580 $ 51,337 $ 11,243 22 %
The operating expenses table above includes the Company’s general and administrative expenses by operation, Printronix’s sales and marketing expenses, and Benchmark’s general and administrative costs. The periods presented above include Benchmark’s general and administrative costs for the full year ended December 31, 2024 compared to an approximate two month period ended December 31, 2023 following our acquisition of Benchmark. The table also includes Deflecto’s sales and marketing expenses and general and administrative costs for the post acquisition period from October 18, 2024 through December 31, 2024. Refer to Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements elsewhere herein for additional information regarding Printronix’s and Deflecto’s operating expenses.
General and Administrative Expenses
A summary of the main drivers of the increases (decreases) in general and administrative expenses is as follows:
Years Ended
December 31,
2024 vs. 2023
(In thousands)
Personnel costs and board fees $ (285)
Variable performance-based compensation costs 1,375
Other general and administrative costs 1,065
General and administrative costs - industrial operations (1,435)
General and administrative costs - energy operations 3,163
General and administrative costs - manufacturing operations 4,158
Amortization of industrial operations intangible assets 2
Amortization of manufacturing operations intangible assets 609
Compensation expense for share-based awards 1,498
Non-recurring employee severance costs 784
Total change in general and administrative expenses $ 10,934
General and administrative expenses include employee compensation and related personnel costs, including variable performance based compensation and compensation expense for share-based awards, office and facilities costs, legal and accounting professional fees, public relations, stock administration, business development, fixed asset depreciation, amortization of Industrial Operations and Manufacturing Operations’ intangible assets, state taxes based on gross receipts and other corporate costs. The periods presented above include Energy Operations’ general administrative expenses for the full year ended December 31, 2024 compared to an approximate two month period ended December 31, 2023 following our acquisition of Benchmark. The table above also includes our Manufacturing Operations general and administrative expenses for the post acquisition period from October 18, 2024 through December 31, 2024.
The increase in variable performance-based compensation costs was primarily due to fluctuations in performance-based compensation. The increase in other general and administrative costs, which relates to our parent company and our Intellectual Property Operations, were primarily due to increases in accounting professional fees. The increase in compensation expense for share-based awards was primarily due to compensation expense incurred related to PSUs granted in 2023 based on the probability assessment performed as of December 31, 2024. Refer to Note 17 to the consolidated financial statements elsewhere herein for additional information regarding compensation expense. The decrease in general and administrative costs of Industrial Operations is due to Printronix’s initiative to reduce costs and operate more efficiently. Non-recurring employee severance costs fluctuate based on the severance arrangements of terminated employees. In addition, our Energy Operations related general and administrative costs contributed an increase of $3.2 million and Manufacturing Operations related general and administrative costs and amortization of intangible assets contributed $4.2 million and $609,000, respectively, in each case driven by the acquisitions of Revolution and Deflecto. Refer to additional general and administrative change explanations above.
Other Income/Expense
Equity Securities Investments
Years Ended
December 31,
2024 2023 $ Change % Change
(In thousands, except percentage change values)
Change in fair value of equity securities $ (31,412) $ 31,423 $ (62,835) (200 %)
Gain (loss) on sale of equity securities 28,861 (10,930) 39,791 (364 %)
Earnings on equity investment in joint venture - 4,167 (4,167) (100 %)
Total net realized and unrealized gain $ (2,551) $ 24,660 $ (27,211) (110 %)
Our equity securities investments, including the Life Sciences Portfolio and trading securities portfolio, are recorded at fair value at each balance sheet date. During the first quarter of 2024, Acacia fully exited its position in Arix. Refer to periodic change explanations above. Refer to Notes 2 and 4 to the consolidated financial statements elsewhere herein for additional information regarding our investment in the Life Sciences Portfolio and other equity securities.
Our results included an unrealized loss from the change in fair value of our equity securities as compared to an unrealized gain in the comparable prior period, and included realized gain from the sale of our equity securities as compared to a realized loss in the prior year. These changes were derived from our Life Sciences Portfolio and trading securities portfolio. The 2024 period unrealized loss and realized gain primarily relates to the sale of Arix shares.
During 2023, we recorded consolidated earnings on equity investment in joint venture, which is part of the Life Sciences Portfolio, of $4.2 million for two milestones earned during the period. There were no milestones earned during the year ended December 31, 2024. Refer to Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements elsewhere herein for additional information.
Non-recurring legacy legal expense
Years Ended
December 31,
2024 2023 $ Change % Change
(In thousands, except percentage change values)
Non-recurring legacy legal expense $ (14,857) $ - $ (14,857) n/a
During the year ended December 31, 2024, we recorded $12.9 million in connection with the AIP Matter in other income (expense) and $2.0 million in other income (expense) in connection with the Slingshot settlement in the consolidated statements of operations. Refer to Note 15 to the consolidated financial statements elsewhere herein for additional information.
Income Taxes
Years Ended
December 31,
2024 2023 $ Change % Change
(In thousands, except percentage change values)
Income tax benefit $ 3,449 $ 1,504 $ 1,945 129 %
Effective tax rate (9) % (2) % n/a (7) %
Our income tax benefit for the year ended December 31, 2024 is primarily attributable to recognizing a benefit for losses incurred year to date offset by foreign withholding taxes. Our income tax benefit for the year ended December 31, 2023 is primarily attributable to the use of tax attributes against 2023 earnings and the release of valuation allowance on the remaining federal net operating losses.
Our 2024 effective tax rate in each period differed from the U.S. federal statutory rate primarily due to foreign withholding taxes which we could not recognize as a foreign tax credit and non-deductible items.
The Company has recorded a partial valuation allowance against our net deferred tax assets as of December 31, 2024 and 2023 on foreign tax credits and certain state net operating losses. Refer to Notes 2 and 19 to the consolidated financial statements elsewhere herein for additional income tax information.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
General
Our foreseeable material cash requirements as of December 31, 2024, are recognized as liabilities or generally are otherwise described in Note 15, “Commitments and Contingencies,” to the consolidated financial statements included elsewhere herein. In particular, our facilities lease obligations, guarantees and certain contingent obligations are further described in Note 15 to the accompanying consolidated financial statements. Historically, we have not entered into off-balance sheet financing arrangements. In addition, the obligations of our Energy Operations Business related to the
Benchmark Revolving Credit Facility and the obligations of our Manufacturing Operations Business related to the Deflecto Term Loan are further described in Note 11 to the accompanying consolidated financial statements. The obligations of our Energy Operations Business related to the asset retirement obligations are further described in Note 10 to the accompanying consolidated financial statements.
Additional cash requirements are generally derived from our operating and investing activities including expenditures for working capital (discussed below), human capital, business development, investments in equity securities and intellectual property, and business combinations. At December 31, 2024, we had unrecognized tax benefits, as further described in Note 19 to the consolidated financial statements.
Certain of our operating subsidiaries are often required to engage in litigation to enforce their patents and patent rights. In connection with any of our operating subsidiaries’ patent enforcement actions, it is possible that a defendant may request and/or a court may rule that an operating subsidiary has violated statutory authority, regulatory authority, federal rules, local court rules, or governing standards relating to the substantive or procedural aspects of such enforcement actions. In such event, a court may issue monetary sanctions against us or our operating subsidiaries or award attorney’s fees and/or expenses to a defendant(s), which could be material.
At December 31, 2024, our primary sources of liquidity were cash and cash equivalents on hand and cash generated from our operating activities.
The Company’s contribution to Benchmark to fund its portion of the Revolution Purchase Price and related fees for the Benchmark Transaction was $59.9 million, which was funded from cash on hand. The remainder of the Revolution Purchase Price was funded by a combination of borrowings under the Benchmark Revolving Credit Facility of approximately $82.7 million and a cash contribution of approximately $15.3 million from other investors in Benchmark, including McArron Partners. Refer to Note 11 to the accompanying consolidated financial statements for additional information regarding the Benchmark Revolving Credit Facility.
On October 18, 2024 the Company acquired Deflecto for a purchase price of $103.7 million, which was funded with a combination of borrowings under the Deflecto Term Loan and from cash on hand. Refer to Note 11 to the accompanying consolidated financial statements for additional information regarding the Deflecto Term Loan.
Furthermore, we intend to grow our company by acquiring additional operating businesses and intellectual property assets. We expect to finance such acquisitions through cash on hand or by engaging in equity or debt financing.
Our management believes that our cash and cash equivalent balances and cash flows from operations will be sufficient to meet our cash requirements through at least twelve months from the date of this Annual Report and for the foreseeable future. We may, however, encounter unforeseen difficulties that may deplete our capital resources more rapidly than anticipated, including those set forth under Item 1A, “Risk Factors.” Any efforts to seek additional funding could be made through issuances of equity or debt, or other external financing. However, additional funding may not be available to us on favorable terms, or at all. The capital and credit markets have experienced extreme volatility and disruption in recent years, and the volatility and impact of the disruption may continue. At times during this period, the volatility and disruption has reached unprecedented levels. In several cases, the markets have exerted downward pressure on stock prices and credit capacity for certain issuers, and the commercial paper markets may not be a reliable source of short-term financing for us. If we fail to obtain additional financing when needed, we may not be able to execute our business plans and our business, conducted by our operating subsidiaries, may suffer.
Cash, Cash Equivalents and Investments
Our consolidated cash, cash equivalents and equity securities totaled $297.0 million at December 31, 2024, compared to $403.2 million at December 31, 2023.
The Benchmark Revolving Credit Facility and Deflecto Revolving Credit Facility include covenants potentially limiting our borrowing capacity as determined by a leverage ratio. As of December 31, 2024, we were in compliance with all financial covenants applicable to our debt agreements. Refer to Note 11 to the accompanying consolidated financial statements for additional information.
Cash Flows Summary
The net change in cash and cash equivalents for the periods presented was comprised of the following:
Years Ended December 31,
2024 2023
(In thousands)
Net cash (used in) provided by:
Operating activities $ 50,122 $ (22,506)
Investing activities (212,963) 16,178
Financing activities 97,556 58,632
Effect of exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents (926) 1
(Decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents $ (66,211) $ 52,305
Cash Flows from Operating Activities
Cash flows from operating activities were comprised of the following for the periods presented:
Years Ended December 31,
2024 2023
(In thousands)
Net (loss) income including noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries $ (34,698) $ 68,930
Adjustments to reconcile net loss including noncontrolling interests in
subsidiaries to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
Depreciation, depletion and amortization 33,574 14,728
Accretion of asset retirement obligation 986 -
Change in fair values Series A redeemable convertible preferred stock embedded derivatives and Series B warrants - (6,716)
Gain on exercise of Series B warrants - (1,525)
Compensation expense for share-based awards 4,795 3,297
Loss (gain) on foreign currency exchange 370 (53)
Change in fair value of equity securities 31,412 (31,423)
(Gain) loss on sale of equity securities (28,861) 10,930
Unrealized loss (gain) on derivatives 610 (781)
Earnings on equity investment in joint venture - (4,167)
Deferred income taxes, net of acquired net deferred tax assets (6,051) (3,657)
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable 69,225 (70,313)
Inventories 1,054 3,301
Prepaid expenses and other assets (9,329) (820)
Accounts payable and accrued expenses (8,124) (4,651)
Royalties and contingent legal fees payable (5,338) 751
Deferred revenue 497 (337)
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities $ 50,122 $ (22,506)
Cash receipts from ARG’s licensees totaled $91.3 million and $12.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. Cash receipts from Printronix's customers totaled $31.0 million and $37.3 million for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. Cash receipts from Benchmark’s customers totaled $61.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2024 and $1.8 million for the period from November 13, 2023 through December 31, 2023. Cash receipts from Deflecto’s customers totaled $24.3 million for the post acquisition period from October 18, 2024 through December 31, 2024. The fluctuations in cash receipts for the periods presented primarily reflects the corresponding fluctuations in revenues recognized during the same periods, as described above, and the related timing of payments received from licensees and customers.
Our reported cash provided by operations for the year ended December 31, 2024 was $50.1 million, compared to cash used in operations of $22.5 million in the prior year. The increase in cash provided by operations was primarily due to net inflows from the total changes in assets and liabilities (refer to Working Capital discussion below), decrease in accounts receivable, decrease in inventories, increase in prepaid expense and other assets, decrease in accounts payable, decrease in royalties and contingent legal fees payable and by the total change in net income (described above) and related noncash adjustments.
Working Capital
Our working capital related to cash flows from operating activities at December 31, 2024 decreased to $39.1 million, compared to $87.0 million at December 31, 2023, which was comprised of the changes in assets and liabilities presented above. The decrease is primarily due to change in accounts receivable and royalties and contingent legal fees payable, which is related to the timing of the cash receipts related to Intellectual Property Operations Business. The decrease in working capital is also due to the increase in accounts payable and accrued expenses and other current liabilities related to our Energy Operations Business and Manufacturing Operations Business. The decreases were partially offset by increases in inventory and prepaid expenses.
Cash Flows from Investing Activities
Cash flows from investing activities were comprised of the following for the periods presented:
Years Ended December 31,
2024 2023
(In thousands)
Acquisition, net of cash acquired (Note 3) $ (87,678) $ (9,409)
Cash reinvested - 9,965
Patent acquisition $ (14,000) $ (6,000)
Purchases of equity securities $ (20,472) $ (13,072)
Sales of equity securities 57,854 32,106
Distributions received from equity investment in joint venture - 2,777
Net purchases of property and equipment and additions to oil and gas properties (148,667) (189)
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities $ (212,963) $ 16,178
Cash outflows from investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2024 was $213.0 million, as compared to cash inflows of $16.2 million in the prior year, primarily due to the net effect of the acquisition of oil and gas properties in the Revolution Transaction, the acquisition of Deflecto, and net cash inflows from our trading securities portfolio equity securities transactions and sale of Arix shares. Refer to Notes 1 and 3 to the consolidated financial statements elsewhere herein for additional information regarding the Revolution Transaction and Deflecto Transaction. Refer to “Other Income/Expense - Equity Securities Investments” above and Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements elsewhere herein for additional information related to Life Sciences Portfolio.
Cash Flows from Financing Activities
Cash flows from financing activities included the following for the periods presented:
Years Ended December 31,
2024 2023
(In thousands)
Repurchase of common stock $ (20,288) $ -
Paydown of Senior Secured Notes - (60,000)
Contributions from noncontrolling interest 15,250 -
Borrowings on the Revolving credit facility 86,010 -
Paydown of Revolving Credit Facility (30,035) (7,700)
Borrowings on the Term Loan 47,488 -
Dividend on Series A Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock - (1,400)
Taxes paid related to net share settlement of share-based awards (1,092) (614)
Proceeds from Rights Offering - 79,111
Proceeds from exercise of Series B warrants - 49,000
Proceeds from exercise of stock options 223 235
Net cash provided by financing activities $ 97,556 $ 58,632
Cash inflows from financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2024 increased to $97.6 million, as compared to cash inflows of $58.6 million in the prior year, primarily due to net cash inflows from borrowings on the Benchmark Revolving Credit Facility and Deflecto Term Loan and contributions from noncontrolling interest related to the Revolution Transaction. The increases were partially offset by decreases due to repurchases of common stock and proceeds in 2023 from a rights offering and exercise of warrants which were non-recurring. Refer to Notes 1, 3 and 11 to the consolidated financial statements elsewhere herein for additional information regarding the Revolution Transaction, Benchmark Revolving Credit Facility and Deflecto Term Loan. Refer to Note 16 to the consolidated financial statements elsewhere herein for additional information regarding the repurchase of common stock.
Critical Accounting Estimates
Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. In preparing these financial statements, we make assumptions, judgments and estimates that involve a significant level of estimation uncertainty and have had or are reasonably likely to have a material impact on our financial condition or results of operations. We base our assumptions, judgments and estimates on historical experience and various other factors that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results could differ materially from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. On a regular basis, we evaluate our assumptions, judgments and estimates and make changes accordingly.
We believe that of the significant accounting policies discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements included elsewhere herein, the following accounting policies require our most difficult, subjective or complex assumptions, judgments and estimates:
•revenue recognition;
•estimates of crude oil and natural gas reserves and values and standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows
•valuation of long-lived assets, goodwill and other intangible assets;
•accounting for income taxes.
We discuss below the critical accounting assumptions, judgements and estimates associated with these policies. Historically, our critical accounting estimates relative to our significant accounting policies have not differed materially
from actual results. For further information on the related significant accounting policies, refer to Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements.
Revenue Recognition
As described below, significant management judgment must be made and used in connection with the revenue recognized in any accounting period. Material differences may result in the amount and timing of revenue recognized or deferred for any period, if management made different judgments.
Printronix recognizes revenue to depict the transfer of goods or services to a customer at an amount that reflects the consideration which it expects to receive for providing those goods or services. To determine the transaction price, Printronix estimates the amount of consideration to which it expects to be entitled in exchange for transferring promised goods or services to a customer. Elements of variable consideration are estimated at the time of sale which primarily include product rights of return, rebates, price protection and other incentives that occur under established sales programs. These estimates are developed using the expected value or the most likely amount method and are reviewed and updated, as necessary, at each reporting period. Revenues, inclusive of variable consideration, are recognized to the extent it is probable that a significant reversal recognized will not occur in future periods. The provision for returns and sales allowances is determined by an analysis of the historical rate of returns and sales allowances over recent quarters, and adjusted to reflect management’s future expectations. For additional information regarding Printronix’s net revenues, refer to Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements.
Benchmark recognizes revenue when performance obligations are satisfied at the point control of the product is transferred to the customer. Virtually all of Benchmark’s contracts’ pricing provisions are tied to a market index, with certain adjustments based on, among other factors, whether a well delivers to a gathering or transmission line, quality of the oil and natural gas products and prevailing supply and demand conditions. As a result, the price of the oil and natural gas fluctuate to remain competitive with other available oil and natural gas supplies. To the extent actual volumes and prices of oil and natural gas products are unavailable at the time of reporting, Benchmark will estimate the amounts. For additional information regarding Benchmark’s revenues, refer to Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements. The differences between such estimates and actual amounts of oil and natural gas sales are recorded in the following month upon receipt of payment from the customer and any differences have historically been insignificant.
Deflecto recognizes revenue to depict the transfer of goods or services to a customer at an amount that reflects the consideration which it expects to receive for providing those goods or services. To determine the transaction price, Deflecto estimates the amount of consideration to which it expects to be entitled in exchange for transferring promised goods or services to a customer. Elements of variable consideration are estimated at the time of sale which primarily include incentives, discounts or rebates that occur under established sales programs. These estimates are developed using the historical experience, anticipated performance and management’s best judgment at the time and are reviewed and updated, as necessary, at each reporting period. Revenues, inclusive of variable consideration, are recognized to the extent it is probable that a significant reversal recognized will not occur in future periods. The allowance for credit losses is determined by evaluating past events and historical loss experience, current events and also future events based on the expectation as of the balance sheet date. For additional information regarding Deflecto’s net revenues, refer to Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements.
Estimate of Crude Oil and Natural Gas Reserves and Values and Standardized Measure of Discounted Future Net Cash Flows
Estimates of crude oil, natural gas and NGL reserves, as determined by independent petroleum engineers, are continually subject to revision based on price, production history and other factors. Estimated crude oil, natural gas and NGL reserves affect the carrying value of oil and gas properties, depreciation, depletion and amortizations, asset retirement obligations, and evaluation of impairment of oil and natural gas properties. Changes in the estimated reserves could have a significant impact on future results of operations. Refer to the Unaudited Supplemental Information on Oil and Natural Gas Properties included elsewhere in this Annual Report for additional discussion of our net proved reserves and Standardized Measure.
Valuation of Long-lived Assets, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
The Company reviews long-lived assets, patents and other intangible assets for potential impairment annually (quarterly for patents) and when events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. In the event the expected undiscounted future cash flows resulting from the use of the asset is less than the carrying amount of
the asset, an impairment loss is recorded in an amount equal to the excess of the asset’s carrying value over its fair value. If an asset is determined to be impaired, the loss is measured based on quoted market prices in active markets, if available. If quoted market prices are not available, the estimate of fair value is based on various valuation techniques, including a discounted value of estimated future cash flows. For additional information regarding ARG’s patent portfolio valuation estimates, refer to Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements. The Company did not record any long-lived asset, patent or other intangible asset impairment charges for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023.
Goodwill asset impairment reviews include determining the estimated fair values of our reporting units. We evaluate Goodwill for impairment annually in the fourth quarter and on an interim basis if the facts and circumstances lead us to believe that more-likely-than-not there has been an impairment. The key assumptions and inputs used in such determinations may include forecasting revenues and expenses, cash flows and capital expenditures, as well as an appropriate discount rate and other inputs. Significant judgment by management is required in estimating the fair value of a reporting unit and in performing impairment reviews. Due to the inherent subjectivity and uncertainty in forecasting future cash flows and earnings over long periods of time, actual results may vary materially from the forecasts. If the carrying value of a reporting unit exceeds the estimated fair value of the reporting unit, then the excess, limited to the carrying amount of goodwill, will be charged to operations as an impairment loss. The Company’s goodwill balance relates to primarily Printronix, which was acquired on October 7, 2021, Benchmark, which was acquired on November 13, 2023, and Deflecto, which was acquired on October 18, 2024, refer to Notes 1 and 3 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information. The Company did not record any goodwill impairment charges for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023.
Accounting for Income Taxes
As part of the process of preparing our consolidated financial statements, we are required to estimate our income taxes in each of the jurisdictions in which we operate. This process involves the estimating of our actual current tax exposure together with assessing temporary differences resulting from recognition differences between the tax code and U.S. GAAP. These differences result in deferred tax assets and liabilities, which are included within our consolidated balance sheets. We must then assess the likelihood that our deferred tax assets will be recovered from future taxable income and to the extent we believe that recovery is not likely, we must establish a valuation allowance. To the extent we establish a valuation allowance or increase this allowance in a period, we must include an expense within the tax provision in the consolidated statements of operations.
Significant management judgment is required in determining our provision for income taxes, our deferred tax assets and liabilities and our valuation allowance. Due to uncertainties related to our ability to utilize certain deferred tax assets in future periods, we have recorded a partial valuation allowance against our net deferred tax assets as of December 31, 2024 and 2023. These assets primarily consist of foreign tax credits and net operating loss carryforwards. Refer to Note 19 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information.
In assessing the need for a valuation allowance, management has considered both the positive and negative evidence available, including but not limited to, estimates of future taxable income and related probabilities, estimates surrounding the character of future income and the timing of realization, consideration of the period over which our deferred tax assets may be recoverable, our recent history of net income and prior history of losses, projected future outcomes, industry and market trends and the nature of existing deferred tax assets. In management’s estimate, any positive indicators, including forecasts of potential future profitability of our businesses, are outweighed by the uncertainties surrounding our estimates and judgments of potential future taxable income, primarily due to uncertainties surrounding the timing of realization of future taxable income and the character of such income in particular future periods (i.e. foreign or domestic). In the event that actual results differ from these estimates or we adjust these estimates should we believe we would be able to realize these deferred tax assets in the future, an adjustment to the valuation allowance would increase income in the period such determination was made.
Any changes in the judgments, assumptions and estimates associated with our analysis of the need for a valuation allowance in any future periods could materially impact our financial position and results of operations in the periods in which those determinations are made.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
The effects of accounting standards adopted in 2024 and the potential effects of accounting standards to be adopted in the future are described in Note 2 to consolidated financial statements included elsewhere herein.

---

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
The primary objective of our short-term investment activities is to preserve principal while concurrently maximizing the income we receive from our equity securities without significantly increasing risk. Some of the securities that we invest in may be subject to interest rate risk and/or market risk. This means that a change in prevailing interest rates, with respect to interest rate risk, or a change in the value of the United States equity markets, with respect to market risk, may cause the principal amount or market value of the equity securities to fluctuate. For example, if we hold a security that was issued with a fixed interest rate at the then-prevailing rate and the prevailing interest rate later rises, the current value of the principal amount of our investment may decline. To minimize these risks in the future, we intend to maintain our portfolio of cash equivalents and equity securities in a variety of securities. Cash equivalents are comprised of investments in U.S. treasury securities and AAA rated money market funds that invest in first-tier only securities, which primarily include domestic commercial paper and securities issued or guaranteed by the U.S. government or its agencies. In general, money market funds are not subject to market risk because the interest paid on such funds fluctuates with the prevailing interest rate. Accordingly, a 100 basis point increase in interest rates or a 10% decline in the value of the United States equity markets would not be expected to have a material impact on the value of such money market funds. Declines in interest rates over time will, however, reduce our interest income.
Investment Risk
We are exposed to investment risks related to changes in the underlying financial condition of certain of our equity investments in technology companies. The fair value of these investments can be significantly impacted by the risk of adverse changes in securities markets generally, as well as risks related to the performance of the companies whose securities we have invested in, risks associated with specific industries, and other factors. These investments are subject to significant fluctuations in fair value due to the volatility of the securities markets and of the underlying businesses.
As of December 31, 2024 and 2023, the carrying value of our equity investments in public and private companies was $59.9 million and $99.8 million, respectively.
We record our equity investments in publicly traded companies at fair value, which are subject to market price volatility. As of December 31, 2024, a hypothetical 10% adverse change in the market price of our investments in publicly traded common stock would have resulted in a decrease of approximately $2.3 million in such equity investments. We evaluate our equity investments in private companies for impairment when events and circumstances indicate that the decline in fair value of such assets below the carrying value is other-than temporary.
Foreign Currency Exchange Risk
Although we historically have not had material foreign operations, we are also exposed to market risks related to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates between the U.S. dollar, and the British Pound and Euro currency exchange rates, primarily related to foreign cash accounts. As of December 31, 2024, we did not have any foreign denominated equity securities.

---

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
The financial statements and related financial information required to be filed hereunder are indexed under Item 15 of this report and are incorporated herein by reference.

---

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.

---

ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Conclusion Regarding the Effectiveness of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)) that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods
specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and that this information is accumulated and communicated to management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate, to allow for timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and management is required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures. Our management, with the participation of our principal executive officer and our principal financial officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2024. Based on the evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of December 31, 2024, due to the material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting related to Benchmark described below.
Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate “internal control over financial reporting,” as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act. Internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of a company’s annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Because of inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies and procedures may deteriorate.
Our management, with the participation of our principal executive officer and our principal financial officer, conducted an assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2024, based on the criteria set forth in the Internal Control Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
Material Weakness Related to Benchmark
Based on the assessment, our management has concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was not effective as of December 31, 2024, as a result of certain deficiencies in information technology (“IT”) general controls (“ITGCs”) for IT systems and applications utilized by Benchmark that are relevant to the preparation of the consolidated financial statements, including appropriate segregation of duties, appropriate restriction of user access and periodic reviews, and program change management controls. These IT deficiencies also resulted in related manual IT-dependent and automated application controls being ineffective. These deficiencies, in the aggregate, constitute a material weakness. Because the material weakness relates to Benchmark, its impact is limited to our Energy Operations and does not impact our other operations.
There were no identified material misstatements to our current year financial statements, no restatements of prior period financial statements and no changes in previously released financial results required as a result of these control deficiencies. In addition, notwithstanding the identified material weakness, management, including our principal executive officer and our principal financial officer, believes the consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly represent, in all material respects our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows at and for the periods presented in accordance with U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.
Management has excluded Deflecto from its assessment of the internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2024, because it was acquired in a business combination during 2024. Deflecto is a wholly-owned subsidiary whose total assets and total revenues represent approximately 18% and 19%, respectively, of our total consolidated assets and revenues as of and for the year ended December 31, 2024.
Our independent registered public accounting firm, Grant Thornton LLP, who audited the 2024 consolidated financial statements and management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, has expressed an adverse opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2024.
Plan for Remediation of Material Weakness
Management is developing a remediation plan to address the material weakness and to improve the design and operating effectiveness of the ITGCs at Benchmark. The remediation plan includes, among other things:
•Reassessing the design and operating effectiveness of internal controls related to change management and user access; and
•Expanding the management and governance over IT system controls.
We are in the process of developing the remediation activities as of the date of this report and believe that upon completion, we will have strengthened the ITGCs at Benchmark to address and successfully remediate the identified material weakness. However, control weaknesses are not considered remediated until new internal controls have been operational for a period of time, are tested, and management concludes that these controls are operating effectively.
Changes in Internal Controls over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with the evaluation required by Rule 13a-15(d) and 15d-15(d) of the Exchange Act that occurred during the quarter ended December 31, 2024 that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Board of Directors and Stockholders
Acacia Research Corporation
Opinion on internal control over financial reporting
We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of Acacia Research Corporation (a Delaware corporation) and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2024, based on criteria established in the 2013 Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”). In our opinion, because of the effect of the material weakness described in the following paragraphs on the achievement of the objectives of the control criteria, the Company has not maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2024, based on criteria established in the 2013 Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by COSO.
A material weakness is a deficiency, or combination of control deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the company’s annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. The following material weakness has been identified and included in management’s assessment.
The Company identified certain deficiencies in information technology (“IT”) general controls for IT systems and applications utilized by Benchmark that are relevant to the preparation of the consolidated financial statements, including appropriate segregation of duties, appropriate restriction of user access and periodic reviews, and program change management controls. These IT deficiencies also resulted in related manual IT-dependent and automated application controls being ineffective. These deficiencies, in the aggregate, constitute a material weakness.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”), the consolidated financial statements of the Company as of and for the year ended December 31, 2024. The material weakness identified above was considered in determining the nature, timing, and extent of audit tests applied in our audit of the 2024 consolidated financial statements, and this report does not affect our report dated March 17, 2025 which expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements.
Basis for opinion
The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting (“Management’s Report”). Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S.
federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Our audit of, and opinion on, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting does not include the internal control over financial reporting of Deflecto Acquisition, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary, whose financial statements reflect total assets and revenues constituting 18 and 19 percent, respectively, of the related consolidated financial statement amounts as of and for the year ended December 31, 2024. As indicated in Management’s Report, Deflecto Acquisition, Inc. was acquired during 2024. Management’s assertion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting excluded internal control over financial reporting of Deflecto Acquisition, Inc.
Definition and limitations of internal control over financial reporting
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP
Houston, Texas
March 17, 2025

---

ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION
During the three months ended December 31, 2024, no director or officer (as defined in Rule 16a-1(f) of the Exchange Act) of Acacia Research Group adopted or terminated a “Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement” or “non-Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement,” as each term is defined in Item 408(a) of Regulation S-K.

---

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Except as provided below, in accordance with General Instruction G(3) to Form 10-K, certain information required by this Item is incorporated herein by reference to our definitive proxy statement for our 2025 annual meeting of stockholders to be filed with the SEC within 120 days after the close of our fiscal year.
Code of Conduct
We have adopted a Code of Conduct that applies to all employees, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer and any persons performing similar functions. Our Code of Conduct is provided on our internet website at www.acaciaresearch.com.

---

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
In accordance with General Instruction G(3) to Form 10-K, the information required by this Item is incorporated herein by reference to our definitive proxy statement for our 2025 annual meeting of stockholders to be filed with the SEC within 120 days after the close of our fiscal year.

---

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
In accordance with General Instruction G(3) to Form 10-K, the information required by this Item is incorporated herein by reference to our definitive proxy statement for our 2025 annual meeting of stockholders to be filed with the SEC within 120 days after the close of our fiscal year.

---

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
In accordance with General Instruction G(3) to Form 10-K, the information required by this Item is incorporated herein by reference to our definitive proxy statement for our 2025 annual meeting of stockholders to be filed with the SEC within 120 days after the close of our fiscal year.

---

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
In accordance with General Instruction G(3) to Form 10-K, the information required by this Item is incorporated herein by reference to our definitive proxy statement for our 2025 annual meeting of stockholders to be filed with the SEC within 120 days after the close of our fiscal year.
PART IV

---

ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
(a)The following documents are filed as part of this report.
(1)Financial Statements.
Page
Acacia Research Corporation Consolidated Financial Statements:
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (PCAOB ID Number 248)
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2024 and 2023
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2024 and 2023
Consolidated Statements of Series A Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock and Stockholders’ Equity for the Years Ended December 31, 2024 and 2023
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2024 and 2023
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Supplemental Information on Oil and Natural Gas Producing Activities (Unaudited)
(2)Financial Statement Schedules.
Financial statement schedules are omitted because they are not applicable or the required information is shown in the Financial Statements or the Notes thereto.
(3)Exhibits.
Refer to Item 15(b) below.
(b)Exhibits. The following exhibits are either filed herewith or incorporated herein by reference:
Exhibit
Number Description
2.1^ Purchase and Sale Agreement dated February 16, 2024 by and between Revolution Resources II, LLC, Revolution II NPI Holding Company, LLC, Jones Energy, LLC, Nosley Assets, LLC, Nosley Acquisition, LLC, and Nosley Midstream, LLC, as Sellers, and BE Anadarko II, LLC, as Buyer (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 20, 2024)
2.2^ Stock Purchase Agreement dated as of October 18, 2024, by and among Deflecto Holdco LLC, as Purchaser, Deflecto Holdings, LLC and Evriholder Finance LLC (collectively, the “Sellers”), Deflecto Acquisition, Inc. and the Sellers’ Representative named therein (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 21, 2024)
3.1 Third Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Acacia Research Corporation (incorporated by reference to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 20, 2022)
3.2 Fifth Amended and Restated Bylaws of Acacia Research Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Amendment No.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 2, 2023)
3.3 Certificate of Retirement of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to Amendment No. 1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 2, 2023)
4.1# Description of Acacia Research Corporation Capital Stock
10.1* Form of Indemnification Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019, filed on March 16, 2020)
10.2* Acacia Research Corporation Amended and Restated Executive Severance Policy (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.26 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, filed on February 26, 2009)
10.3* 2013 Acacia Research Corporation Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Annex A to the Company's Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A filed on April 24, 2013)
10.4* Form of Stock Issuance Agreement under the 2013 Acacia Research Corporation Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K on May 22, 2013)
10.5* 2016 Acacia Research Corporation Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2016, filed on August 9, 2016)
10.6* Form of Stock Option Agreement under the 2016 Acacia Research Corporation Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.24 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016, filed on March 10, 2017)
10.7* Form of Stock Issuance Agreement under the 2016 Acacia Research Corporation Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.25 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016, filed on March 10, 2017)
10.8* Employment Agreement, dated June 19, 2020, by and between Acacia Research Group, LLC and Marc W. Booth (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 25, 2020)
10.9* Employment Agreement, effective March 16, 2021, by and between Acacia Research Group, LLC and Jason Soncini (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 22, 2021)
10.10* Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2023, filed on August 3, 2023)
10.11* Form of Performance-Based Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2023, filed on August 3, 2023)
10.12* Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, effective February 13, 2024, by and between Acacia Research Corporation and Martin D. McNulty, Jr. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 14, 2024)
10.13* Employment Agreement, effective May 3, 2023, among Acacia Research Corporation and Robert Rasamny (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.17 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2023, filed on March 14, 2024)
10.14* 2024 Acacia Research Corporation Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Appendix A to the Company’s Definitive Proxy Statement filed on April 19, 2024)
10.19 Recapitalization Agreement dated October 30, 2022, by and among Acacia Research Corporation, Starboard Value Partners LP and the investors listed on the Schedule of Investors attached thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 1, 2022)
10.20 Amended and Restated Registration Rights Agreement dated as of February 14, 2023, by and among Acacia Research Corporation and the investors listed on the Schedule of Buyers attached thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 14, 2023)
10.21^ Loan Agreement dated as of April 17, 2024, by and among BE Anadarko, as Borrower, Frost Bank, as Administrative Agent and LC Issuer, and the lenders from time to time party thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 17, 2024)
10.22 Services Agreement dated December 12, 2023 by and between Starboard Value LP and Acacia Research Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.21 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2023, filed on March 14, 2024)
10.23^ Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated October 18, 204, among Deflecto, LLC, as Borrower, the other Loan Parties thereto, the Lenders party thereto and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1) to the Company’s Current Report 8-K filed on October 21, 2024)
19.1# Acacia Research Corporation Insider Trading Policy
21.1#
List of Subsidiaries
23.1#
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, Grant Thornton LLP
23.2# Consent of Cawley, Gillespie & Associates, Inc.
24.1 Power of Attorney (included in the signature page hereto).
31.1#
Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
31.2#
Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
32.1†
Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b)/15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
32.2†
Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b)/15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
97.1 Acacia Research Corporation Compensation Recovery Policy (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 97.1 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2023, filed on March 14, 2024)
99.1# Report of Cawley, Gillespie & Associates, Inc. as of December 31, 2024
99.2# Report of Cawley, Gillespie & Associates, Inc. as of December 31, 2023
101#
The following financial statements from the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, formatted in Inline Extensible Business Reporting Language (iXBRL) include: (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) Consolidated Statements of Operations, (iii) Consolidated Statements of Series A Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock and Stockholders' Equity, (iv) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows and (v) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, tagged as blocks of text and including detailed tags.
104#
Cover Page Interactive Data File (formatted in iXBRL and included in Exhibit 101).
____________________
*The referenced exhibit is a management contract, compensatory plan or arrangement required to be filed as an exhibit to this Annual Report on Form 10-K pursuant to Item 15(a)(3) of Form 10-K.
^ This filing excludes certain schedules and exhibits pursuant to Item 601(a)(5) of Regulation S-K, which the registrant agrees to furnish supplementally to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request; provided, however, that the registrant may request confidential treatment for any schedules or exhibits so furnished.
# Filed herewith.
†The certifications attached as Exhibits 32.1 and 32.2 that accompany this Annual Report on Form 10-K are not deemed filed with the SEC and are not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of Acacia Research Corporation under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, whether made before or after the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, regardless of any general incorporation language contained in any filing.
(c)Other financial statement schedules.
Not applicable.