EDGAR 10-K Filing

Company CIK: 1010470
Filing Year: 2025
Filename: 1010470_10-K_2025_0000939057-25-000242.json

---

ITEM 1. BUSINESS
Item 1. Business
General
Provident Financial Holdings, Inc. (the “Corporation”), a Delaware corporation, was organized in January 1996 for the purpose of becoming the holding company of Provident Savings Bank, F.S.B. (the “Bank”) upon the Bank’s conversion from a federal mutual to a federal stock savings bank (“Conversion”). The Conversion was completed on June 27, 1996. The Corporation is regulated by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (“Federal Reserve”). At June 30, 2025, the Corporation had consolidated total assets of $1.25 billion, total deposits of $888.8 million and stockholders’ equity of $128.5 million. The Corporation has not engaged in any significant activity other than holding the stock of the Bank. Accordingly, the information set forth in this Annual Report on Form 10-K (“Form 10-K”), including the audited consolidated financial statements and related data, relates primarily to the Bank. As used in this report, the terms “we,” “our,” “us,” and the “Corporation” refer to Provident Financial Holdings, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries, unless the context indicates otherwise. When we refer to the “Provident” in this report, we are referring to Provident Financial Holdings, Inc. When we refer to the “Bank” or “Provident Savings Bank” in this report, we are referring to Provident Savings Bank, F.S.B., a wholly owned subsidiary of Provident.
The Bank, founded in 1956, is a federally chartered stock savings bank headquartered in Riverside, California. The Bank is regulated by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (“OCC”), its primary federal regulator, and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”), the insurer of its deposits. The Bank’s deposits are federally insured up to applicable limits by the FDIC. The Bank has been a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) - San Francisco since 1956.
The Bank is a financial services company committed to serving consumers and small to mid-sized businesses in the Inland Empire region of Southern California. The Bank conducts its business operations as Provident Bank, and through its subsidiary, Provident Financial Corp (“PFC”). The business activities of the Bank consist of community banking, investment services and trustee services for real estate transactions.
The Bank’s community banking operations primarily consist of accepting deposits from customers within the communities surrounding its full-service offices and investing those funds in the origination of single-family, multi-family and commercial real estate loans and, to a lesser extent, construction, commercial business, consumer and other mortgage loans to be held for investment. Through its subsidiary, PFC, the Bank conducts trustee services for the Bank’s real estate transactions and in the past has held real estate for investment. For additional information, see “Subsidiary Activities” in this Form 10-K. The activities of PFC are included in the Bank's operating segment results. The Bank’s revenues are derived principally from interest earned on its loan and investment portfolios, and fees generated through its community banking activities.
On June 22, 2006, the Bank established the Provident Savings Bank Charitable Foundation (“Foundation”) in order to further its commitment to the local community. The specific purpose of the Foundation is to promote and provide for the betterment of youth, education, housing and the arts in the Bank’s primary market areas of Riverside and San Bernardino counties. The Foundation was funded with a $500,000 charitable contribution made by the Bank in fiscal 2006. The Bank contributed $40,000 to the Foundation in both fiscal 2025 and 2024.
Subsequent Event
On July 24, 2025, the Corporation announced that the Provident Board of Directors declared a cash dividend of $0.14 per share. Shareholders of Provident common stock at the close of business on August 14, 2025 were entitled to receive the cash dividend, payable on September 4, 2025.
Market Area
The Bank is headquartered in Riverside, California and, as of June 30, 2025, operates 12 full-service banking offices in Riverside County and one full-service banking office in San Bernardino County. Management considers Southern California, including Riverside County, western San Bernardino County (collectively, the “Inland Empire”), and surrounding counties, to be the Bank’s primary market, with the Inland Empire its primary market area for deposits. Based on the most recent FDIC data, the Bank was the largest independent community bank (based on total assets) headquartered in Riverside County and held the 11th largest deposit market share of all banks in the county, with the second largest share among community banks.
According to the 2020 Census Bureau, Riverside and San Bernardino counties have the fourth and fifth largest populations in California, respectively, and are part of the greater Los Angeles metropolitan area, consisting primarily of suburban and urban communities. The Inland Empire, with a population of approximately 4.7 million, is relatively densely populated. The U.S. Department of Labor’s Bureau of Labor Statistics reported an unemployment rate of 5.9% in the Inland Empire in June 2025, slightly higher than California’s rate of 5.4% and the national rate of 4.1%. In June 2024, these rates were 5.3% in the Inland Empire, 5.2% in California, and 4.1% nationwide.
Economic growth for the Inland Empire, also known as the Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario Metropolitan Statistical Area, is expected to rise modestly in 2025. Last year, the outlook was highlighted with concerns about potential headwinds related the uncertainty surrounding the 2024 presidential election. This negatively impacted both consumer and business spending decisions and future investment plans. These uncertainties have been replaced by policy decisions by the new administration regarding (i) tariffs, (ii) deportation, (iii) fiscal policy (especially taxes), and (iv) regulation, making forecasting difficult. Regardless, the beginning of an expansive consumer credit policy has begun with the previous interest cuts in 2024, and it is expected to continue. This is expected to generate positive impulses for the Inland Empire economy, which is expected to outperform the state economy but not the national economy. The outlook for 2025 is based on the assumption that the administration’s proposed policies on tariffs and deportation will not have an immediate effect on trade and construction. Part of this is the larger role that the logistics industry plays in the Inland Empire. Transportation, warehousing, and wholesale have moved into third place in terms of overall employment share and represent the largest share in San Bernardino County (third largest in Riverside County). The opening of new facilities in 2025 will require new workers, and the continuation of consumption of imported goods by U.S. consumers will continue to drive growth in this segment, subject to the outcome of tariff negotiations with Mexico and Canada. (Source: Lowe Institute of Political Economy, The State of the Region 2025 Economic and Election Report, February 2025).
Closed escrow sales of existing, single-family detached homes in California totaled a seasonally adjusted annualized rate of 264,260 in June 2025. The statewide annualized sales figure represents what would be the total number of homes sold during 2025 if sales maintained the June 2025 pace throughout the year. It is adjusted to account for seasonal factors that typically influence home sales. June home sales activity rose 4.0 percent from the 254,190 homes sold in May 2025 and was down 0.3 percent from a year ago, when 264,960 homes were sold on an annualized basis. The June result reversed three consecutive months of sales declines and was only one of two months of sales increases for the first half of 2025. The year-over-year decline marked the third straight monthly decrease and was the first time since late 2023 that annual sales fell for three consecutive months. Year-to-date sales were slightly above a year ago. Statewide pending sales in June slipped from last year’s level for the seventh consecutive month, posting the largest year-over-year drop since January 2025. California’s median home price fell for the second straight month in June, slipping below the $900,000 mark for the first time in three months. The June median price of $899,560 was down 0.1 percent from May and also down 0.1 percent from $900,720 in June 2024. The decline in June was not in line with the June’s historical average gain of 0.8 percent, suggesting non-seasonal factors such as market uncertainty and elevated mortgage rates had a negative lingering effect on housing demand and home prices. (Source: California Association of Realtors® - July 17, 2025 News Release).
Competition
The Bank faces significant competition in its market area in originating real estate loans and attracting deposits. The population growth in the Inland Empire has attracted numerous financial institutions to the Bank’s market area. The Bank’s primary competitors are large national and regional commercial banks as well as other community-oriented banks and savings institutions. The Bank also faces competition from credit unions and mortgage companies, as well as unregulated or less regulated non-banking entities operating locally and elsewhere. Many of these institutions are significantly larger
than the Bank and therefore have greater financial and marketing resources than the Bank. This competition may limit the Bank’s growth and profitability in the future.
Reportable Segments
Management monitors the revenue and expense components of the various products and services the Bank offers, but operations are managed and financial performance is evaluated on a corporation-wide basis in comparison to a business plan which is developed each year. Accordingly, all operations are considered by management to be one operating segment and one reportable segment as contained in the Consolidated Statements of Operations to the Corporation’s audited consolidated financial statements and Note 17, “Segment Reporting” of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.
Internet Website
The Corporation maintains a website at www.myprovident.com. The information contained on that website is not included as a part of, or incorporated by reference into, this Form 10-K. Other than an investor’s own internet access charges, the Corporation makes available free of charge through that website the Corporation’s annual report, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and current reports on Form 8-K, including amendments to these reports, if any, as soon as reasonably practicable after these materials have been electronically filed with, or furnished to, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). In addition, the SEC maintains a website that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding companies filed electronically with the SEC. This information is available at www.sec.gov.
Lending Activities
General. The lending activity of the Bank is comprised of the origination of single-family, multi-family and commercial real estate loans and, to a lesser extent, construction, commercial business, consumer and other mortgage loans to be held for investment. Additional lending activities have historically included originating saleable single-family loans, primarily fixed-rate first trust deed mortgages. The Bank’s net loans held for investment were $1.05 billion at June 30, 2025, representing 84% of consolidated total assets. This compares to $1.05 billion, or 83% of consolidated total assets, at June 30, 2024.
At June 30, 2025, the maximum amount the Bank could have loaned to any one borrower and the borrower’s related entities under applicable regulations was $19.7 million, or 15% of the Bank’s unimpaired capital and surplus. At that date, the Bank had no individual loan or aggregate loans to related borrowers with outstanding balances in excess of this amount. The Bank’s five largest lending relationships at June 30, 2025 consisted of: four multi-family loans totaling $4.9 million to a group of related borrowers; three multi-family loans totaling $4.0 million to a group of related borrowers; one multi-family loan of $4.0 million; one multi-family loan of $3.9 million; and one multi-family loan of $3.7 million. The real estate collateral securing these loans is primarily located in Southern and Northern California. At June 30, 2025, all of these loans were performing in accordance with their contractual repayment terms.
Loans Held For Investment Analysis. The following table sets forth the composition of the Bank’s loans held for investment at the dates indicated:
At June 30,
(Dollars In Thousands)
Amount
Percent
Amount
Percent
Mortgage loans:
Single-family
$
544,425
52.23
%
$
518,091
49.30
%
Multi-family
423,417
40.62
445,182
42.36
Commercial real estate
72,766
6.98
83,349
7.93
Construction
0.04
2,692
0.26
Other
0.01
0.01
Total mortgage loans
1,041,099
99.88
1,049,409
99.86
Commercial business loans
1,267
0.12
1,372
0.13
Consumer loans
-
0.01
Total loans held for investment, gross
1,042,423
100.00
%
1,050,846
100.00
%
Advance payments of escrows
Deferred loan costs, net
9,453
9,096
ACL(1) on loans
(6,424)
(7,065)
Total loans held for investment, net
$
1,045,745
$
1,052,979
(1) Allowance for credit losses (“ACL”)
Maturity of Loans Held for Investment. The following table sets forth information at June 30, 2025 regarding the dollar amount of principal payments becoming contractually due during the periods indicated for loans held for investment. Demand loans, loans having no stated schedule of principal payments, loans having no stated maturity, and overdrafts are reported as becoming due within one year. The table does not include any estimate of prepayments, which can significantly shorten the average life of loans held for investment and may cause the Bank’s actual principal payment experience to differ materially from that shown below:
After
After
One Year
5 Years
Within
Through
Through
Beyond
(In Thousands)
One Year
5 Years
15 Years
15 Years
Total
Mortgage loans:
Single-family
$
$
1,279
$
21,142
$
521,999
$
544,425
Multi-family
-
15,680
9,759
397,978
423,417
Commercial real estate
5,072
15,320
45,613
6,761
72,766
Construction
-
-
Other
-
-
-
Commercial business loans
1,239
-
-
1,267
Consumer loans
-
-
-
Total loans held for investment, gross
$
6,462
$
32,513
$
76,514
$
926,934
$
1,042,423
The following table sets forth the dollar amount of all loans held for investment due after one year from June 30, 2025 which have fixed and floating or adjustable interest rates:
Floating or
Adjustable
(Dollars In Thousands)
Fixed-Rate
%
(1)
Rate
%
(1)
Mortgage loans:
Single-family
$
106,282
%
$
438,138
%
Multi-family
-
%
423,325
%
Commercial real estate
%
67,321
%
Construction
-
-
%
%
Commercial business loans
%
-
-
%
Total loans held for investment, gross
$
106,775
%
$
929,186
%
(1) As a percentage of each category.
Scheduled contractual principal payments of loans do not reflect the actual life of such assets. The average life of loans is generally substantially less than their contractual terms because of prepayments. In addition, due-on-sale clauses generally give the Bank the right to declare loans immediately due and payable in the event, among other things, the borrower sells the real property that secures the loan. The average life of mortgage loans tends to increase, however, when current market interest rates are substantially higher than the interest rates on existing loans held for investment and, conversely, decrease when the interest rates on existing loans held for investment are substantially higher than current market interest rates, as borrowers are generally less inclined to refinance their loans when market rates increase and more inclined to refinance their loans when market rates decrease.
The table below describes the geographic dispersion of real estate secured loans held for investment (gross) at June 30, 2025 and 2024, as a percentage of the total dollar amount outstanding (dollars in thousands):
As of June 30, 2025:
Inland
Southern
Other
Other
Empire(1)
California(2)
California
States
Total
Loan Category
Balance
%
Balance
%
Balance
%
Balance
%
Balance
%
Single-family
$
143,217
%
$
179,162
%
$
221,819
%
$
-
%
$
544,425
%
Multi-family
50,450
%
243,790
%
129,177
%
-
-
%
423,417
%
Commercial real estate
13,744
%
39,213
%
19,809
%
-
-
%
72,766
%
Construction
-
-
%
%
-
-
%
-
-
%
%
Other
-
-
%
%
-
-
%
-
-
%
%
Total
$
207,411
%
$
462,656
%
$
370,805
%
$
-
%
$
1,041,099
%
(1) Comprised of Riverside and San Bernardino counties.
(2) Other than the Inland Empire.
As of June 30, 2024:
Inland
Southern
Other
Other
Empire(1)
California(2)
California
States
Total
Loan Category
Balance
%
Balance
%
Balance
%
Balance
%
Balance
%
Single-family
$
146,003
%
$
175,127
%
$
196,707
%
$
-
%
$
518,091
%
Multi-family
56,693
%
256,692
%
131,797
%
-
-
%
445,182
%
Commercial real estate
13,583
%
44,574
%
25,192
%
-
-
%
83,349
%
Construction
%
1,480
%
%
-
-
%
2,692
%
Other
-
-
%
%
-
-
%
-
-
%
%
Total
$
216,507
%
$
477,968
%
$
354,680
%
$
-
%
$
1,049,409
%
(1) Comprised of Riverside and San Bernardino counties.
(2) Other than the Inland Empire.
Single-Family Mortgage Loans. One of the Bank’s primary lending activities is the origination and purchase of adjustable and fixed rate mortgage loans to be held for investment, secured by first trust deed mortgages on owner-occupied, single-family (one to four units) residences in the communities where the Bank’s branches are located and surrounding areas in Southern and Northern California. During fiscal 2025, the Bank originated $92.5 million of single-family loans to be held for investment, all of which were underwritten in accordance with the Bank’s origination guidelines, and did not purchase any single-family loans. This compares to single-family loan originations of $40.9 million and no loan purchases during fiscal 2024. At June 30, 2025, total single-family loans held for investment increased 5% to $544.4 million, or 52% of the total loans held for investment, from $518.1 million, or 49% of the total loans held for investment, at June 30, 2024. The increase in the single-family loans in fiscal 2025 was primarily attributable to new loans originated for investment that exceeded loan principal payments. During fiscal 2025 and 2024, the Bank had no charge-offs or recoveries from non-performing single-family loans. At June 30, 2025 and 2024, total non-performing single-family loans were $948,000 and $2.6 million, respectively, net of allowances and charge-offs, and there were no loans past due 30 to 89 days at both dates.
The Bank has underwriting standards that generally conform with the standards of the government sponsored entities (“GSE”) which include Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Mortgage insurance is usually required for all loans exceeding 80% loan-to-value (“LTV”) based on the lower of the purchase price or appraised value at the time of loan origination. The Bank is not currently offering loans with LTV ratios greater than 90%. Currently, the maximum LTV ratio is 90% for new purchase transactions and limited cash-out refinances and 75% for cash-out refinances. The maximum loan amount offered on single-family homes is $1.5 million. A limited cash-out refinance limits cash back to the borrower to the lesser of 2% of the new loan amount or $2,000. The minimum FICO score currently accepted for a purchase or no cash-out refinance transaction is 700, while the minimum FICO score for a cash-out refinance transaction is 720. The FICO score represents the creditworthiness of a borrower based on the borrower’s credit history, as reported by an independent third party. A higher FICO score indicates a greater degree of creditworthiness. Bank regulators have issued guidance stating that a FICO score of 660 and below is indicative of a “subprime” borrower.
The Bank currently lends on residential properties classified as single-family units, planned unit developments and condominiums. Underwriting standards and guidelines may change at any time, based on shifts in real estate market conditions or changes to GSE policies and guidelines. To enhance protection, the Bank purchases lender-paid mortgage insurance for certain single-family mortgage loans. As of June 30, 2025, a total of approximately $149.0 million of single-family mortgage loans, with a 78% weighted average LTV at the time of origination have lender-paid mortgage insurance. This insurance provides a weighted average coverage ratio of approximately 11% of the original loan amount.
Prior to fiscal 2009, many of the loans we originated for investment consisted of non-traditional single-family residential loans that do not conform to Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac underwriting guidelines as a result of the characteristics of the borrower or property, the loan terms, loan size or exceptions from agency underwriting guidelines. In exchange for the additional risk to us associated with these loans, these borrowers generally are required to pay a higher interest rate, and depending on the credit history, a lower loan-to-value ratio was generally required than for a conforming loan. Our non-traditional single-family residential loans include loans to borrowers who provided limited or no documentation of their
income or stated income loans, negative amortization loans (a loan in which accrued interest exceeding the required monthly loan payment is added to loan principal up to 115% of the original loan amount), more than 30-year amortization loans, and loans to borrowers with a FICO score below 660 (these loans are considered subprime by the OCC).
As of June 30, 2025, these non-traditional loans totaled $16.9 million, comprising 3% of total single-family residential loans held for investment and 2% of total loans held for investment, with a weighted average seasoning of 16.6 years. At that date, stated income loans totaled $11.3 million, more than 30-year amortization loans totaled $5.7 million, low FICO score loans totaled $1.6 million, and negative amortization loans totaled $380,000 (the outstanding balances described may overlap more than one category).
The Bank currently offers fixed-rate loans in Riverside and San Bernardino counties, along with adjustable-rate mortgage (“ARM”) loans throughout California. Substantially all the loans originated by the Bank comply with GSE underwriting standards concerning credit and collateral. The Bank’s ARM products offer various options, with interest rates adjusting every six months after an initial fixed period of five to ten years. These adjustments are limited by caps on semi-annual and lifetime rate changes.
Currently, the Bank’s ARM programs have interest rates that consist of an index tied to the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (“SOFR”), plus a margin. The programs are subject to a maximum semi-annual increase or decrease of one percentage point and a maximum lifetime increase of five percentage points, and the rate may not fall below the margin. The portfolio primarily consists of the following indices, with a margin generally ranging from 2.00% to 4.00%, which are used to calculate the periodic interest rate changes: SOFR, the 12-month average U.S. Treasury rate (“12 MAT”), or the weekly average yield on one-year U.S. Treasury securities adjusted to a constant maturity of one year (“CMT”). Loans based on the SOFR index constitute a majority of the Bank’s loans held for investment. The majority of the ARM loans held for investment have five, seven, or 10-year fixed periods prior to the first adjustment and provide for fully amortizing payments throughout the term of the loan. These loans have embedded interest rate risk, which may arise if interest rates increase during the initial fixed rate period or if rates rise beyond the periodic or lifetime caps.
Borrower demand for ARM loans versus fixed-rate mortgage loans is a function of the level of interest rates, the expectations of changes in the level of interest rates and the difference between the initial interest rates and fees charged for each type of loan. The relative amount of fixed-rate mortgage loans and ARM loans that can be originated at any time is largely determined by the demand for each product in a given interest rate and competitive environment.
The retention of ARM loans, rather than fixed-rate loans, helps to reduce the Bank’s exposure to changes in interest rates. There is, however, unquantifiable credit risk resulting from the potential of increased interest charges to be paid by the borrower as a result of increases in interest rates. It is possible that, during periods of rising interest rates, the risk of default on ARM loans may increase as a result of the increase in the required payment from the borrower. Further, the risk of default may increase because ARM loans originated by the Bank occasionally provide, as a marketing incentive, for initial rates of interest below those rates that would apply if the adjustment index plus the applicable margin were initially used for pricing. Because of these characteristics, ARM loans are subject to increased risks of default or delinquency. Additionally, while ARM loans allow the Bank to increase the sensitivity of its assets as a result of changes in interest rates, the extent of this interest rate sensitivity is limited by the periodic and lifetime interest rate adjustment limits. Furthermore, because loan indexes may not respond perfectly to changes in market interest rates, upward adjustments on loans may occur more slowly than increases in the Bank’s cost of interest-bearing liabilities, especially during periods of rapidly increasing interest rates. Conversely, downward adjustments on the Bank’s cost of funds typically lag adjustments on ARM loans which may occur more rapidly during periods of declining interest rates. For additional information concerning the effect of interest rates on our loan portfolio, see Item 7A, “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk” of this Form 10-K.
The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”) requires lenders to make a reasonable, good faith determination of a borrower’s ability to repay any consumer closed-end credit transaction secured by a dwelling and to limit prepayment penalties. Increased risks of legal challenge, private right of action and regulatory enforcement actions result from these rules. The Bank may originate loans that do not meet the definition of a “qualified mortgage” (“QM”). To mitigate the risks involved with non-QM loans, the Bank has implemented systems, processes, procedural and product changes, and maintains its underwriting standards, to ensure that the “ability-to-repay” requirements are adequately addressed.
A decline in real estate values subsequent to the time of origination of real estate secured loans could result in higher loan delinquency levels, foreclosures, provisions for credit losses and net charge-offs. Real estate values and real estate markets are beyond the Bank’s control and are generally affected by changes in national, regional or local economic conditions and other factors. These factors include fluctuations in interest rates and the availability of loans to potential purchasers, housing supply and demand, changes in tax laws and other governmental statutes, regulations and policies and acts of nature, such as earthquakes, fires, droughts and other natural disasters particular to California where substantially all of our real estate collateral is located. If real estate values decline from the levels at the time of loan origination, the value of our real estate collateral securing the loans could be significantly reduced. The Bank’s ability to recover on defaulted loans by foreclosing and selling the real estate collateral would then be diminished and it would be more likely that the Bank could suffer losses on defaulted loans.
Multi-Family and Commercial Real Estate Loans. At June 30, 2025, multi-family loans were $423.4 million and commercial real estate loans were $72.8 million, or 41% and 7%, respectively, of loans held for investment. This compares to multi-family loans of $445.2 million and commercial real estate loans of $83.3 million, or 42% and 8%, respectively, of loans held for investment at June 30, 2024. Consistent with its strategy to diversify the composition of loans held for investment, the Bank has emphasized the balance between single-family loans and multi-family and commercial real estate loans. During fiscal 2025, the Bank originated $28.9 million in multi-family and commercial real estate loans and did not purchase any loans. This compares to fiscal 2024, when $31.9 million of such loans were originated and no loans were purchased. As of June 30, 2025, the average outstanding loan balance was approximately $713,000 for multi-family loans and approximately $720,000 for commercial real estate loans.
The multi-family loans originated by the Bank are predominately adjustable-rate loans, including hybrid ARM loans, with terms ranging from 10 to 30 years and amortization schedules of 25 to 30 years. Similarly, the Bank’s commercial real estate loans are mainly adjustable-rate loans, also including hybrid ARM loans, with the same maturity terms and amortization schedules. The interest rates on multi-family and commercial real estate ARM loans generally adjust monthly, quarterly, semi-annually, or annually, based on a specific margin over the relevant interest rate index and are subject to periodic and lifetime interest rate caps. At June 30, 2025, $407.1 million, or 96%, of the Bank’s multi-family loans were secured by projects with five to 36 units. The Bank’s commercial real estate loan portfolio primarily consists of loans secured by small office buildings, light industrial buildings, warehouses, and small retail centers. The properties securing these loans are mainly located in the counties of Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside, San Bernardino, San Diego and San Francisco. The Bank typically originates multi-family and commercial real estate loans in amounts ranging from $350,000 to $6.0 million. At June 30, 2025, the Bank had 52 commercial real estate and multi-family loans with principal balances greater than $1.5 million, totaling $114.9 million. Appraisals are obtained for all properties securing multi-family and commercial real estate loans. The underwriting process for these loans includes a thorough analysis of the property's cash flows to ensure adequate debt service coverage, as well as an evaluation of the financial resources, experience, and income levels of the borrowers and guarantors.
Multi-family and commercial real estate loans afford the Bank an opportunity to price the loans with higher interest rates than those generally available from single-family mortgage loans. However, loans secured by such properties are generally greater in amount, more difficult to evaluate and monitor and are more susceptible to default as a result of general economic conditions and, therefore, involve a greater degree of risk than single-family residential mortgage loans. Because payments on loans secured by multi-family and commercial real estate properties are often dependent on the successful operation and management of the properties, repayment of such loans may be impacted by adverse conditions in the real estate market or the economy. During both fiscal 2025 and 2024, the Bank had no charge-offs or recoveries on multi-family and commercial real estate loans. At June 30, 2025 and 2024, $466,000 and $0, respectively, were non-performing and no multi-family and commercial real estate loans were 30 to 89 days delinquent. Non-performing and delinquent loans may increase in the event of a general decline in California real estate markets or if adverse economic conditions prevail.
Construction Loans. The Bank originates from time to time two types of construction loans: short-term construction loans and construction/permanent loans. During fiscal 2025 and 2024, the Bank originated a total of $725,000 and $1.5 million of construction loans (including undisbursed loan funds), respectively. As of June 30, 2025 and 2024, the Bank had construction loans totaling $402,000 and $2.7 million, net of undisbursed loan funds of $529,000 and $435,000, respectively. On these dates, the loans consisted of bridge loans totaling $206,000 and $1.5 million, short-term construction loans totaling $0 and $228,000, and construction/permanent loans totaling $196,000 and $984,000 respectively.
Short-term construction loans include three types of loans: custom construction, tract construction, and speculative construction. The Bank provides construction financing for single-family, multi-family and commercial real estate properties. Custom construction loans are made to individuals who, at the time of application, have a contract executed with a builder to construct their residence. Custom construction loans are generally originated for a term of 12 to 18 months, with adjustable or fixed interest rates at the prime lending rate plus a margin and with loan-to-value ratios of up to 75% of the appraised value of the completed property. The owner secures long-term permanent financing at the completion of construction. At both June 30, 2025 and 2024, there were no custom short-term single-family construction loans.
From time to time the Bank makes lot loans to individuals to finance land acquisition prior to the start of construction or tract construction loans to subdivision builders. These subdivisions are usually financed and built in phases. A thorough analysis of market trends and demand within the area are reviewed for feasibility. Tract construction may include the building and financing of model homes under a separate loan. At June 30, 2025 and 2024, there was one land loan of $89,000 and 95,000 (reported as other mortgage loans), respectively, and no tract construction loans at both dates.
Speculative construction loans are made to home builders and are termed “speculative” because the home builder does not have, at the time of loan origination, a signed sale contract with a home buyer who has a commitment for permanent financing with either the Bank or another lender for the finished home. The home buyer may be identified during or after the construction period. The builder may be required to debt service the speculative construction loan for a significant period of time after the completion of construction until the homebuyer is identified. At both June 30, 2025, the Bank had no speculative construction loans, as compared to one speculative construction loan of $228,000, net of undisbursed loan funds of $32,000 at June 30, 2024.
Construction/permanent loans automatically roll from the construction to the permanent phase. The construction phase generally lasts 12 to 18 months and the interest rate charged is generally fixed at a margin above prime rate and with a loan-to-value ratio of up to 75% of the appraised value of the completed property. At June 30, 2025, there were $196,000 of construction/permanent loans, net of undisbursed loan funds of $529,000 as compared to $984,000 of construction/permanent loans, net of undisbursed loan funds of $403,000, at June 30, 2024.
Construction loans under $1.0 million are approved by Bank personnel specifically designated to approve construction loans. The Bank’s Loan Committee, comprised of the Chief Executive Officer, Chief Lending Officer, Senior Vice President - Single-Family Division and Vice President - Loan Administration, approves all construction loans over $1.0 million. Prior to approval of any construction loan, an independent fee appraiser inspects the site and the Bank reviews the existing or proposed improvements, identifies the market for the proposed project, and analyzes the pro-forma data and assumptions on the project. In the case of a tract or speculative construction loan, the Bank also reviews the experience and expertise of the builder. The Bank obtains credit reports, financial statements and tax returns on the borrowers and guarantors, an independent appraisal of the project, and any other expert report necessary to evaluate the proposed project. In the event of cost overruns, the Bank requires the borrower to deposit their own funds into a loan-in-process account, which the Bank disburses consistent with the completion of the subject property pursuant to a revised disbursement schedule.
The construction loan documents require that construction loan proceeds be disbursed in increments as construction progresses. Disbursements are based on periodic on-site inspections by independent inspectors and/or Bank personnel. At inception, the Bank also requires borrowers to deposit funds into a loan-in-process account covering the difference between the actual cost of construction and the loan amount. The Bank regularly monitors the construction loan portfolio, economic conditions and housing inventory. The Bank’s property inspectors perform periodic inspections. The Bank believes that the internal monitoring system helps reduce many of the risks inherent in its construction loans.
Construction loans afford the Bank the opportunity to achieve higher interest rates and fees with shorter terms to maturity than its single-family mortgage loans. Construction loans, however, are generally considered to involve a higher degree of risk than single-family mortgage loans because of the inherent difficulty in estimating both a property’s value at completion of the project and the cost of the project. The nature of these loans is such that they are generally more difficult to evaluate and monitor. If the estimate of construction costs proves to be inaccurate, the Bank may be required to advance funds beyond the amount originally committed to permit completion of the project. If the estimate of value upon completion
proves to be inaccurate, the Bank may be confronted with a project whose value is insufficient to assure full repayment. Projects may also be jeopardized by disagreements between borrowers and builders and by the failure of builders to pay subcontractors. Loans to builders to construct homes for which no purchaser has been identified carry additional risk because the payoff for the loan depends on the builder’s ability to sell the property prior to the time that the construction loan matures. The Bank has sought to address these risks by adhering to strict underwriting policies, disbursement procedures and monitoring practices. In addition, because the Bank’s construction lending is in its primary market area, changes in the local or regional economy and real estate market could adversely affect the Bank’s construction loans held for investment. During fiscal 2025 and 2024, the Bank had no charge-offs or recoveries on construction loans, and no construction loans were non-performing or 30-89 days delinquent at both June 30, 2025 and June 30, 2024.
Participation Loan Purchases and Sales. To expand production and diversify risk, the Bank purchases loans and loan participations, primarily with collateral located in California, which allows for greater geographic distribution outside of the Bank’s primary lending areas. The Bank typically purchases between 50% and 100% of the total loan amount. When purchasing a participation loan, the lead lender usually retains a servicing fee, which reduces the loan yield to approximately the cost the Bank would incur if it serviced the loan itself. All properties serving as collateral for these loan participations are inspected by either a Bank employee or a third-party inspection service before being approved by the Loan Committee. The Bank uses the same underwriting criteria for these purchases as it does for loans it originates. The Bank did not purchase any loans to be held for investment in fiscal 2025 and 2024, due primarily to concerns over asset quality in light of the current economic climate and fewer loans available for purchase. As of June 30, 2025 and 2024, there were $1.7 million and $1.8 million of loans serviced by other financial institutions, respectively. As of June 30, 2025 and 2024, all loans serviced by others were performing according to their original contractual payment terms, except for one loan totaling $362,000 that was classified as non-performing as of June 30, 2024.
The Bank also sells participating interests in loans when it has been determined that it is beneficial to diversify the Bank’s risk. Participation sales enable the Bank to maintain acceptable loan concentrations and comply with the Bank’s loans to one borrower policy. Generally, selling a participating interest in a loan increases the yield to the Bank on the portion of the loan that is retained. The Bank did not sell any participation loans in fiscal 2025 or fiscal 2024.
Commercial Business Loans. The Bank has a Business Banking Department that primarily serves businesses located within the Inland Empire. Commercial business loans allow the Bank to diversify its lending and increase the average loan yield. As of June 30, 2025, commercial business loans were $1.3 million, down from $1.4 million at June 30, 2024. These loans represent secured and unsecured lines of credit and term loans secured by business assets.
Commercial business loans are generally made to customers who are well known to the Bank and are generally secured by accounts receivable, inventory, business equipment and/or other assets. The Bank’s commercial business loans may be structured as term loans or as lines of credit. Lines of credit are made at variable rates of interest equal to a negotiated margin above the prime rate and term loans are at a fixed or variable rate. The Bank may also require personal guarantees from financially capable parties associated with the business, based on a review of personal financial statements. Commercial business term loans are generally made to finance the purchase of assets and have maturities of five years or less. Commercial lines of credit are typically made for the purpose of providing working capital and are typically approved with a term of one year or less.
Commercial business loans involve greater risk than residential mortgage loans and involve risks that are different from those associated with residential and commercial real estate loans. Real estate loans are generally considered to be collateral based lending with loan amounts based on predetermined loan to collateral value and liquidation of the underlying real estate collateral is viewed as the primary source of repayment in the event of borrower default. Although commercial business loans are often collateralized by equipment, inventory, accounts receivable or other business assets including real estate, the liquidation of collateral in the event of a borrower default is often an insufficient source of repayment because accounts receivable may not be collectible and inventories and equipment may be obsolete or of limited use. Accordingly, the repayment of a commercial business loan depends primarily on the creditworthiness of the borrower (and any guarantors), while liquidation of collateral is secondary and oftentimes an insufficient source of repayment. At June 30, 2025 and 2024, there were no non-performing commercial business loans. During fiscal 2025 and 2024, the Bank had no charge-offs or recoveries on commercial business loans.
Consumer Loans. At June 30, 2025, the Bank’s consumer loans were $57,000, down from $65,000 at June 30, 2024. The Bank offers open-ended lines of credit on an unsecured basis, primarily deposit overdraft lines of credit.
Consumer loans potentially have a greater risk than residential mortgage loans, particularly in the case of loans that are unsecured. Consumer loan collections are dependent on the borrower’s ongoing financial stability, and thus are more likely to be adversely affected by job loss, illness or personal bankruptcy. Furthermore, the application of various federal and state laws, including federal and state bankruptcy and insolvency laws, may limit the amount that can be recovered on such loans. The Bank had no non-performing consumer loans at both June 30, 2025 and 2024. During fiscal 2025 and 2024, the Bank had no charge-offs or recoveries on consumer loans.
Loans Originations, Purchases, Sales and Repayments
Mortgage loans are primarily originated for investment. Prior to scaling back originations of saleable single-family fixed-rate mortgage loans during fiscal 2019, a large amount of single-family fixed-rate mortgage loans were originated for sale to institutional investors. Mortgage loans sold to investors generally were sold without recourse other than standard representations and warranties. Generally, mortgage loans sold to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were sold on a non-recourse basis and foreclosure losses are generally the responsibility of the purchaser and not the Bank, except in the case of Federal Housing Administration (“FHA”) and Veterans’ Administration (“VA”) loans used to form Government National Mortgage Association pools, which are subject to limitations on the FHA’s and VA’s loan guarantees.
The following table shows the Bank’s loan originations, purchases, sales and principal repayments during the periods indicated. No loans were purchased during the periods indicated:
Year Ended June 30,
(In Thousands)
Loans originated for sale:
Wholesale originations
$
4,580
$
5,605
Total loans originated for sale
4,580
5,605
Loans sold:
Servicing retained
(4,580)
(5,605)
Total loans sold
(4,580)
(5,605)
Loans originated for investment:
Mortgage loans:
Single-family
92,498
40,920
Multi-family
25,115
22,112
Commercial real estate
3,777
9,757
Construction
1,480
Commercial business loans
1,250
Total loans originated for investment
122,665
75,519
Loan principal repayments
(133,314)
(99,915)
Increase (decrease) in other items, net (1)
3,415
(254)
Net decrease in loans held for investment
$
(7,234)
$
(24,650)
(1) Includes net changes in undisbursed loan funds, deferred loan fees or costs, ACL, fair value of loans held for investment and advance payments of escrows.
Loan Servicing
The Bank receives fees from a variety of investors in return for performing the traditional services of collecting individual loan payments on loans sold by the Bank to such investors. At June 30, 2025, the Bank was servicing $34.4 million of loans for others, slightly lower than the $34.6 million at June 30, 2024. The decrease was primarily attributable to scheduled principal payments and prepayments, partly offset by new loans sold with servicing retained. Loan servicing includes processing payments, accounting for loan funds and collecting and paying real estate taxes, hazard insurance and other loan-related items such as private mortgage insurance. After the Bank receives the gross mortgage payment from individual borrowers, it remits to the investor a predetermined net amount based on the loan sale agreement for that mortgage.
Servicing assets are amortized in proportion to and over the period of the estimated net servicing income and are carried at the lower of cost or fair value. The fair value of servicing assets is determined by calculating the present value of the estimated net future cash flows consistent with contractually specified servicing fees. The Bank periodically evaluates servicing assets for impairment, which is measured as the excess of cost over fair value. This review is performed on a disaggregated basis, based on loan type and interest rate. Generally, loan servicing becomes more valuable when interest rates rise (as prepayments typically decrease) and less valuable when interest rates decline (as prepayments typically increase). In estimating fair values at June 30, 2025 and 2024, the Bank used a weighted average Constant Prepayment Rate (“CPR”) of 10.58% and 9.59%, and a weighted average discount rate of 9.04% and 9.06%, respectively. The required impairment reserve against servicing assets at June 30, 2025 and 2024 was $151,000 and $170,000, respectively. In aggregate, servicing assets had a carrying value of $282,000 and a fair value of $131,000 at June 30, 2025, compared to a carrying value of $272,000 and a fair value of $102,000 at June 30, 2024.
Asset Quality
Delinquent Loans. When a mortgage loan borrower fails to make a required payment when due, the Bank initiates collection procedures. In most cases, delinquencies are cured promptly; however, if the loan remains delinquent on the 120th day for single-family loans or the 90th day for other loans, or sooner if the borrower is chronically delinquent, and after all reasonable means of obtaining the payment have been exhausted, foreclosure proceedings, according to the terms of the security instrument and applicable law, are initiated. Interest income is reduced by the full amount of accrued and uncollected interest on such loans.
As of June 30, 2025, total non-performing assets, net of the ACL and fair value adjustments, were $1.4 million, or 0.11% of total assets, which was comprised of seven single-family loans and one multi-family loan. As of June 30, 2025, $1.2 million or 86% of the total non-performing loans had a current payment status. As of June 30, 2025, there was one non-performing single-family loan of $198,000 that was in foreclosure process. In comparison, as of June 30, 2024, total non-performing assets, net of the ACL and fair value adjustments, were $2.6 million, or 0.20% of total assets, consisting of 10 single-family loans, of which $1.1 million, or 43%, had a current payment status. As of June 30, 2024, there were no non-performing loans in foreclosure process. The Bank had no real estate owned (“REO”) at June 30, 2025 and 2024.
The following table sets forth information with respect to the Bank’s non-performing assets, net of the ACL and fair value adjustments, at the dates indicated:
At June 30,
(Dollars In Thousands)
Loans on non-performing status:
Mortgage loans:
Single-family
$
$
2,596
Multi-family
-
Total
1,414
2,596
Accruing loans past due 90 days or more
-
-
Total non-performing loans
1,414
2,596
Real estate owned, net
-
-
Total non-performing assets
$
1,414
$
2,596
Non-performing loans as a percentage of loans held for investment, net
0.14
%
0.25
%
Non-performing loans as a percentage of total assets
0.11
%
0.20
%
Non-performing assets as a percentage of total assets
0.11
%
0.20
%
The Bank assesses loans individually and classifies the loans as non-performing and substandard in accordance with regulatory requirements when the accrual of interest has been discontinued, loans have been modified or management has serious doubts about the future collectability of principal and interest, even though the loans may be currently performing. Factors considered in determining classification include, but are not limited to, expected future cash flows, collateral value, the financial condition of the borrower and/or guarantor and current economic conditions. The Bank measures each non-performing loan based on Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 326, “Financial Instruments - Credit Losses,” establishes a collectively evaluated or individually evaluated allowance, and charges off those loans or portions of loans deemed uncollectible.
Modified Loans to Borrowers Experiencing Financial Difficulty. We occasionally modify loans to alleviate temporary difficulties in the borrower’s financial condition and/or constraints on the borrower’s ability to repay the loan, and to minimize our potential losses. We refer to these modifications as modified loans to troubled borrowers. Modifications may include changes in the amortization terms of the loan, reductions in interest rates, acceptance of interest only payments, and, in very limited cases, reductions to the outstanding loan balance. Such loans are typically placed on nonaccrual status when there is doubt concerning the full repayment of principal and interest, when the loan is past due for a 120 days for single-family loans or 90 days for other loans, or sooner if other indicators of credit deterioration occur, such as issuance of a notice of default or chronic borrower delinquency. Loans may be returned to accrual status when all contractual amounts past due have been brought current, and the borrower’s performance under the modified loan terms, as well as the ultimate collectability of all contractual amounts due, is no longer in doubt.
In March 2022, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2022-02, “Financial Instruments-Credit Losses (Topic 326) Troubled Debt Restructurings and Vintage Disclosures.” This ASU provides new guidance on the treatment of troubled debt restructurings (“TDR”) in relation to the adoption of the current expected credit loss methodology, or CECL model, for the accounting for credit losses (discussed below). Previous accounting guidance related to TDRs is eliminated and new disclosure requirements are adopted in regards to loan modifications made to borrowers experiencing financial difficulties under the assumption that the CECL model will capture credit losses related to TDRs. The required disclosures regarding gross write-offs for financing receivables by year of origination and loan modifications are presented under Note 3 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. Subsequent to the adoption of ASC 326, the Bank no longer reports TDRs or classifies loans as TDRs given those loans
previously recognized as TDRs have been incorporated into the CECL methodology in regard to credit loss reserves as of July 1, 2023. As of June 30, 2025 and 2024, there were no loan modifications for borrowers experiencing financial difficulties at both dates.
Foreclosed Real Estate. Real estate acquired by the Bank as a result of foreclosure or by deed-in-lieu of foreclosure is classified as REO until it is sold. When a property is acquired, it is recorded at its fair market value less the estimated cost of sale. Subsequent declines in value are charged to operations. As of both June 30, 2025 and 2024, there was no REO property. In managing the real estate owned properties for quick disposition, the Bank completes the necessary repairs and maintenance to the individual properties before listing for sale, obtains new appraisals and broker price opinions (“BPO”) to determine current market listing prices, and engages local realtors who are most familiar with real estate sub-markets, among other techniques, which generally results in the quick disposition of real estate owned.
Asset Classification. The OCC has adopted various regulations regarding the problem assets of savings institutions. The regulations require that each institution review and classify its assets on a regular basis. In addition, in connection with examinations of institutions, OCC examiners have the authority to identify problem assets and, if appropriate, require them to be classified. There are three classifications for problem assets: substandard, doubtful and loss. Substandard assets have one or more defined weaknesses and are characterized by the distinct possibility that the institution will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected. Doubtful assets have the weaknesses of substandard assets with the additional characteristic that the weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions and values questionable, and there is a high possibility of loss. An asset classified as a loss is considered uncollectible and of such little value that continuance as an asset of the institution is not warranted. If an asset or portion thereof is classified as loss, the institution establishes an individually evaluated allowance and may subsequently charge-off the amount of the asset classified as loss. A portion of the ACL established to cover probable losses related to assets classified substandard or doubtful may be included in determining an institution’s regulatory capital. Assets that do not currently expose the institution to sufficient risk to warrant classification in one of the aforementioned categories but possess weaknesses are designated as special mention and are closely monitored by the Bank.
The following table summarizes classified assets, which is comprised of classified loans located in California, including loans classified by the Bank as special mention, net of the ACL, and REO at the dates indicated:
At June 30, 2025
At June 30, 2024
(Dollars In Thousands)
Balance
Count
Balance
Count
Special mention loans:
Mortgage loans:
Single-family
$
$
1,099
Commercial real estate
1,003
-
-
Total special mention loans
1,065
1,099
Substandard loans:
Mortgage loans:
Single-family
1,233
2,596
Multi-family
2,680
2,066
Total substandard loans
3,913
4,662
Total classified loans
4,978
5,761
Real estate owned:
Single-family
-
-
-
-
Total real estate owned
-
-
-
-
Total classified assets
$
4,978
$
5,761
Total classified assets as a percentage of total assets
0.40
%
0.45
%
Not all of the Bank’s classified assets are delinquent or non-performing. In determining whether the Bank’s assets expose the Bank to sufficient risk to warrant classification, the Bank may consider various factors, including the payment history of the borrower, the loan-to-value ratio, the reserves of the borrower and guarantors, and the debt coverage ratio of the property securing the loan, among other factors. After consideration of these and other factors, the Bank may determine that the asset in question, though not currently delinquent, presents a risk of loss that requires it to be classified or designated as special mention. In addition, the Bank’s loans held for investment may include single-family, commercial and multi-family real estate loans with a balance exceeding the current market value of the collateral which are not classified because they are performing and have borrowers and/or guarantor who have sufficient resources to support the repayment of the loan.
The Bank has established a formal methodology for determining the provision for credit losses. The methodology is set forth in a written policy and considers the need for a collectively evaluated allowance for groups of homogeneous loans and an individually evaluated allowance for problem loans. The Bank’s methodology for assessing the appropriateness of the ACL consists of several key elements.
The Bank maintains an allowance for credit losses on loans held for investment in accordance with ASC 326. The allowance is determined using historical loss experience, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts, and is reviewed and adjusted quarterly by management. Loans that do not share similar risk characteristics are evaluated individually, and non-performing loans are charged off when the estimated collectability of principal and interest is in doubt. Management also considers qualitative factors, including changes in lending practices, collateral values, concentrations of credit, and current economic conditions, when assessing the adequacy of the allowance. Management believes the allowance is sufficient to absorb expected losses on the loan portfolio. For additional information regarding the Bank’s allowance for credit losses, the methodology used to estimate expected credit losses, and the composition of non-performing loans, see Note 3 - Loans and Allowance for Credit Losses in the Consolidated Financial Statements.
The following table shows certain credit ratios at and for the periods indicated and each component of the ratio’s calculations:
At or For The Year Ended June 30,
(Dollars In Thousands)
ACL on loans as a percentage of total gross loans held for investment at period end
0.62
%
0.67
%
ACL on loans
$
6,424
$
7,065
Total gross loans held for investment
$
1,042,423
$
1,050,846
Non-performing loans as a percentage of net loans held for investment at period end
0.14
%
0.25
%
Total non-performing loans, net
$
1,414
$
2,596
Total loans held for investment, net
$
1,045,745
$
1,052,979
ACL on loans as a percentage of gross non-performing loans at period end
452.08
%
264.71
%
ACL on loans
$
6,424
$
7,065
Total gross non-performing loans
$
1,421
$
2,669
Net charge-offs to average loans receivable during the period:
Mortgage loans:
Single-family:
-
%
-
%
Net charge-offs
$
-
$
-
Average loans receivable
$
533,551
$
520,071
Multi-family:
-
%
-
%
Net charge-offs
$
-
$
-
Average loans receivable
$
434,955
$
459,025
Commercial real estate:
-
%
-
%
Net charge-offs
$
-
$
-
Average loans receivable
$
78,257
$
86,425
Construction:
-
%
-
%
Net charge-offs
$
-
$
-
Average loans receivable
$
1,722
$
2,340
Other:
-
%
-
%
Net charge-offs
$
-
$
-
Average loans receivable
$
$
Commercial business loans:
-
%
-
%
Net charge-offs
$
-
$
-
Average loans receivable
$
2,816
$
1,592
Consumer loans:
-
%
-
%
Net charge-offs
$
-
$
-
Average loans receivable
$
$
Total loans:
-
%
-
%
Net charge-offs
$
-
$
-
Total average loans receivable
$
1,051,448
$
1,069,616
The distribution of the ACL on loans at the dates indicated is summarized as follows:
At June 30,
% of
% of
Loans in
Loans in
Each
Each
Category
Category
to Total
to Total
(Dollars In Thousands)
Amount
Loans
Amount
Loans
Mortgage loans:
Single-family
$
5,734
52.23
%
$
6,295
49.30
%
Multi-family
40.62
42.36
Commercial real estate
6.98
7.93
Construction
0.04
0.26
Other
0.01
0.01
Commercial business loans
0.12
0.13
Consumer loans
-
-
-
0.01
Total ACL
$
6,424
100.00
%
$
7,065
100.00
%
Investment Securities Activities
Federally chartered savings institutions are permitted under federal and state laws to invest in various types of liquid assets, including U.S. Treasury obligations, securities of various federal agencies and government sponsored enterprises and of state and municipal governments, deposits at the FHLB, certificates of deposit of federally insured institutions, certain bankers’ acceptances, mortgage-backed securities and federal funds. Subject to various restrictions, federally chartered savings institutions may also invest a portion of their assets in commercial paper and corporate debt securities.
The investment policy of the Bank, established by the Board of Directors and implemented by the Bank’s Asset-Liability Committee, seeks to provide and maintain adequate liquidity, complement the Bank’s lending activities, and generate a favorable return on investment without incurring undue interest rate risk or credit risk. Investments are made based on certain considerations, such as credit quality, yield, maturity, liquidity and marketability. The Bank also considers the effect that the proposed investment would have on the Bank’s risk-based capital requirements and interest rate risk sensitivity.
At June 30, 2025 and 2024, the Bank’s investment securities portfolio was $111.0 million and $131.9 million, respectively, which primarily consisted of federal agency and GSE obligations. During fiscal 2025, the Bank purchased one investment security for $981,000; while during 2024, the Bank did not purchase any investment securities. At June 30, 2025 and 2024, the Bank’s securities portfolio did not contain securities of any issuer with an aggregate book value in excess of 10% of our equity capital, excluding those issued by the United States government or its agencies or a GSE.
The following table sets forth the composition of the Bank’s investment portfolio at the dates indicated:
At June 30,
Estimated
Estimated
Amortized
Fair
Amortized
Fair
(Dollars In Thousands)
Cost
Value
Percent
Cost
Value
Percent
Held to maturity securities:
U.S. government sponsored enterprise MBS(1)
$
104,549
$
94,371
93.69
%
$
125,883
$
110,478
95.04
%
U.S. government sponsored enterprise CMO(2)
4,525
4,431
4.40
3,713
3,460
2.97
U.S. SBA securities(3)
0.32
0.39
Total investment securities - held to maturity
$
109,399
$
99,126
98.41
%
$
130,051
$
114,393
98.40
%
Available for sale securities:
U.S. government agency MBS(1)
$
1,072
$
1,082
1.07
%
$
1,222
$
1,208
1.04
%
U.S. government sponsored enterprise MBS(1)
0.44
0.48
Private issue CMO(2)
0.08
0.08
Total investment securities - available for sale
$
1,587
$
1,607
1.59
%
$
1,861
$
1,849
1.60
%
Total investment securities
$
110,986
$
100,733
100.00
%
$
131,912
$
116,242
100.00
%
(1)Mortgage-backed securities (“MBS”)
(2)Collateralized mortgage obligations (“CMO”)
(3)Small Business Administration ("SBA")
The following table sets forth the outstanding balance, maturity and weighted average yield of the investment securities at June 30, 2025. The weighted average yields were calculated by multiplying each carrying value by its yield and dividing the sum of these results by the total carrying values.
Due in
Due
Due
Due
One Year
After One to
After Five to
After
or Less
Five Years
Ten Years
Ten Years
Total
(Dollars in Thousands)
Amount
Yield
Amount
Yield
Amount
Yield
Amount
Yield
Amount
Yield
Held to maturity securities:
U.S. government sponsored enterprise MBS
$
3.17
%
$
4,007
2.19
%
$
39,791
1.35
%
$
60,682
1.74
%
$
104,549
1.60
%
U.S. government sponsored enterprise CMO
-
-
2.63
4.86
2,629
1.96
4,525
2.72
U.S. SBA securities
-
-
-
-
-
-
4.85
4.85
Total investment securities - held to maturity
$
3.17
%
$
4,921
2.27
%
$
40,773
1.43
%
$
63,636
1.76
%
$
109,399
1.66
%
Available for sale securities:
U.S. government agency MBS
$
-
-
%
$
-
-
%
$
4.87
%
$
5.17
%
$
1,082
4.90
%
U.S. government sponsored enterprise MBS
-
-
-
-
6.66
-
-
6.66
Private issue CMO
-
-
-
-
5.78
-
-
5.78
Total investment securities - available for sale
$
-
-
%
$
-
-
%
$
1,501
5.45
%
$
5.17
%
$
1,607
5.43
%
Total investment securities
$
3.17
%
$
4,921
2.27
%
$
42,274
1.57
%
$
63,742
1.77
%
$
111,006
1.71
%
The actual maturity and yield for MBS, SBA and CMO may differ from the stated maturity and stated yield due to scheduled amortization, prepayments and acceleration of premium amortization or discount accretion.
As of June 30, 2025
Unrealized Holding Losses
Unrealized Holding Losses
Unrealized Holding Losses
(In Thousands)
Less Than 12 Months
12 Months or More
Total
Fair
Unrealized
Fair
Unrealized
Fair
Unrealized
Description of Securities
Value
Losses
Value
Losses
Value
Losses
Held to maturity
U.S. government sponsored enterprise MBS
$
-
$
-
$
90,022
$
10,305
$
90,022
$
10,305
U.S. government sponsored enterprise CMO
-
-
3,435
3,435
U.S. SBA securities
$
-
-
Total investment securities - held to maturity
93,457
10,413
93,781
10,414
Available for sale
U.S government agency MBS
-
-
-
Private issue CMO
-
-
-
-
Total investment securities - available for sale
-
-
-
Total investment securities
$
$
$
93,487
$
10,413
$
93,848
$
10,414
The Bank evaluates individual investment securities quarterly for impairment based on ASC 326. At June 30, 2025, the Bank reported $10.4 million of unrealized holding losses, which virtually all were in a loss position for 12 months or more. This compares to June 30, 2024, when the Bank reported $15.8 million of unrealized holding losses, all of which were in a loss position for 12 months or more. The unrealized losses on investment securities were attributable to changes in interest rates relative to when the investment securities were purchased and not due to the credit quality of the investment securities, which are predominately GSE securities that are either explicitly or implicitly guaranteed by the U.S. government and have a long history of no credit losses. Therefore, the Corporation has determined that the unrealized losses are due to the fluctuating nature of interest rates, and not related to any potential credit risks within the investment portfolio. The Bank does not currently intend to sell any investment securities classified as held to maturity or available for sale and as such, records the investment security at book value or fair market value as prescribed by accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. ("U.S. GAAP."). As a part of the Bank’s monthly risk assessment, it runs a number of stressed liquidity scenarios to determine if it is more likely than not that the Bank will be required to sell the investment security before the recovery of its amortized costs basis. These liquidity scenarios support the Bank’s assessment that it has the ability to hold these held to maturity securities until maturity or available for sale securities until recovery of the amortized costs is realized and it is not more likely than not that the Bank will be required to sell the securities prior to recovery of the amortized costs. There was no ACL on investment securities held to maturity and there was no impairment on investment securities available for sale at June 30, 2025 and 2024.
At June 30, 2025 and 2024, the Corporation did not hold any investment securities held to maturity or investment securities available for sale with the intent to sell and determined it had the ability to hold these investment securities until maturity. As previously discussed, it also determined that it was more likely than not that the Bank would not be required to sell the securities prior to recovery of the amortized cost basis; therefore, no impairment losses were recorded on investment securities available for sale and investment securities held to maturity for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2025 and 2024.
Deposit Activities and Other Sources of Funds
General. Deposits and loan repayments are the major sources of the Bank’s funds for lending and other investment purposes. Scheduled loan repayments are a relatively stable source of funds, while deposit inflows and outflows are influenced significantly by general interest rates and money market conditions. Borrowings through the FHLB - San Francisco, Federal Reserve Bank (“FRB”) of San Francisco and the correspondent bank may be used to mitigate the declines in the availability of funds from other sources.
Deposit Accounts. Many of the Bank’s depositors are residents of the State of California. Deposits are attracted from within the Bank’s market area by offering a broad selection of deposit instruments, including checking, savings, money market and time deposit accounts. Deposit account terms vary, differentiated by the minimum balance required, the time periods that the funds must remain on deposit and the interest rate, among other factors. In determining the terms of its deposit accounts, the Bank considers current interest rates, profitability to the Bank, interest rate risk characteristics, competition and its customers’ preferences and concerns. Generally, the Bank’s deposit rates are commensurate with the median rates of its competitors within a given market. The Bank may occasionally pay above-market interest rates to attract or retain deposits when less expensive sources of funds are not available. The Bank may also pay above-market interest rates in specific markets in order to increase the deposit base of a particular office or group of offices. The Bank reviews its deposit composition and pricing on a weekly basis.
The Bank generally offers time deposits for terms not exceeding seven years. As illustrated in the following table, time deposits represented approximately 35% of the Bank’s deposit portfolio at June 30, 2025, compared to approximately 31% at June 30, 2024. The time deposits included $131.0 million and $131.8 million of brokered certificates of deposit at June 30, 2025 and 2024, respectively. At June 30, 2025, the Bank had related party deposits of approximately $8.0 million, compared to $6.3 million at June 30, 2024. For additional information, see Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in this Form 10-K.
The following table sets forth information concerning the Bank’s weighted average interest rate of deposits at June 30, 2025:
Weighted
Minimum
Percentage
Average
Amount
Balance
of Total
Interest Rate
Original Term
Deposit Account Type
(In Thousands)
(In Thousands)
Deposits
Transaction accounts:
-%
N/A
Checking accounts - noninterest-bearing
$
-
$
83,566
9.40
%
0.04%
N/A
Checking accounts - interest-bearing
$
-
240,597
27.07
0.28%
N/A
Savings accounts
$
-
230,610
25.95
0.32%
N/A
Money market accounts
$
-
21,703
2.44
Time deposits:
3.55%
30 days or less
Fixed-term, fixed rate
$
0.07
3.28%
31 to 90 days
Fixed-term, fixed rate
$
6,486
0.73
3.80%
91 to 180 days
Fixed-term, fixed rate
$
91,124
10.25
3.48%
181 to 365 days
Fixed-term, fixed rate
$
87,496
9.85
3.92%
Over 1 to 2 years
Fixed-term, fixed rate
$
107,790
12.13
0.89%
Over 2 to 3 years
Fixed-term, fixed rate
$
7,018
0.79
0.60%
Over 3 to 5 years
Fixed-term, fixed rate
$
9,030
1.02
0.78%
Over 5 to 10 years
Fixed-term, fixed rate
$
2,696
0.30
1.34%
$
888,772
100.00
%
Deposit Flows. The following table sets forth the balances (inclusive of interest credited) and changes in the dollar amount of deposits in the various types of accounts offered by the Bank at and between the dates indicated:
At June 30,
Percent
Percent
of
Increase
of
Increase
(Dollars In Thousands)
Amount
Total
(Decrease)
Amount
Total
(Decrease)
Checking accounts - noninterest-bearing
$
83,566
9.40
%
$
(12,061)
$
95,627
10.77
%
$
(7,379)
Checking accounts - interest-bearing
240,597
27.07
(14,027)
254,624
28.66
(48,248)
Savings accounts
230,610
25.95
(8,268)
238,878
26.89
(51,326)
Money market accounts
21,703
2.44
(3,621)
25,324
2.85
(8,227)
Time deposits:(1)
Fixed-term, fixed rate which mature:
Within one year
278,268
31.31
32,555
245,713
27.66
79,212
Over one to two years
25,264
2.84
5,660
19,604
2.21
(17,458)
Over two to five years
8,416
0.95
1,092
7,324
0.82
(8,245)
Over five years
0.04
(906)
1,254
0.14
(552)
Total(2)
$
888,772
100.00
%
$
$
888,348
100.00
%
$
(62,223)
(1) Includes brokered certificates of deposit of $131.0 million and $131.8 million at June 30, 2025 and 2024, respectively.
(2) Includes uninsured deposits of approximately $158.7 million (of which $53.8 million are collateralized) and $122.7 million (of which $9.0 million are collateralized) at June 30, 2025 and 2024, respectively. The amounts of uninsured deposits are based on estimated amounts of uninsured deposits as of the reported period. Such estimates are based on the same methodologies and assumptions used for regulatory reporting requirements.
Time Deposits by Rates. The following table sets forth the aggregate balance of time deposits categorized by interest rates at the dates indicated:
At June 30,
(Dollars In Thousands)
Below 1.00%
$
44,351
$
54,668
1.00 to 1.99%
1,545
6,190
2.00 to 2.99%
1,315
3.00 to 3.99%
71,468
6,447
4.00 to 4.99%
188,617
111,996
5.00 to 5.99%
5,000
94,170
Total
$
312,296
$
273,895
Time Deposits by Remaining Maturity. The following table sets forth the aggregate dollar amount of time deposits at June 30, 2025, differentiated by interest rates and remaining maturity:
Over One
Over Two
Over Three
After
One Year
to
to
to
Four
(Dollars In Thousands)
or Less
Two Years
Three Years
Four Years
Years
Total
Below 1.00 %
$
29,969
$
5,618
$
3,019
$
2,058
$
3,687
$
44,351
1.00 to 1.99 %
1,399
-
-
-
1,545
2.00 to 2.99 %
1,315
-
-
-
-
1,315
3.00 to 3.99%
68,468
3,000
-
-
-
71,468
4.00 to 4.99%
172,117
16,500
-
-
-
188,617
5.00 to 5.99%
5,000
-
-
-
-
5,000
Total
$
278,268
$
25,264
$
3,019
$
2,058
$
3,687
$
312,296
Time Deposits Insurance Coverage by the FDIC. The following tables set forth the time deposit FDIC insurance coverage by account and remaining maturity at the dates indicated:
At June 30, 2025
Maturity Period
Insured
Uninsured
Total
(In Thousands)
Three months or less
$
85,057
$
31,879
$
116,936
Over three to six months
60,628
30,539
91,167
Over six to twelve months
67,588
2,577
70,165
Over twelve months
33,452
34,028
Total
$
246,725
$
65,571
$
312,296
At June 30, 2024
Maturity Period
Insured
Uninsured
Total
(In Thousands)
Three months or less
$
58,386
$
8,470
$
66,856
Over three to six months
72,995
8,576
81,571
Over six to twelve months
93,014
4,272
97,286
Over twelve months
25,715
2,467
28,182
Total
$
250,110
$
23,785
$
273,895
Deposit Activity. The following table sets forth the deposit activity of the Bank at and for the periods indicated:
At or For the Year Ended June 30,
(In Thousands)
Beginning balance
$
888,348
$
950,571
Net deposits before interest credited
(10,802)
(71,889)
Interest credited
11,226
9,666
Net increase (decrease) in deposits
(62,223)
Ending balance
$
888,772
$
888,348
Borrowings. The FHLB - San Francisco functions as a central reserve bank providing credit for member financial institutions. As a member, the Bank is required to own capital stock in the FHLB - San Francisco and is authorized to apply for advances using such stock and certain of its mortgage loans and other assets (principally investment securities) as collateral, provided certain creditworthiness standards have been met. Advances are made pursuant to several different credit programs. Each credit program has its own interest rate, maturity, terms and conditions. Depending on the program, limitations on the amount of advances are based on the financial condition of the member institution and the adequacy of collateral pledged to secure the credit. The Bank utilizes advances from the FHLB - San Francisco as an alternative to deposits to supplement its supply of lendable funds, to meet deposit withdrawal requirements and to help manage interest rate risk. The FHLB - San Francisco has served as the Bank’s primary borrowing source.
As of June 30, 2025, the FHLB - San Francisco borrowing capacity was limited to 40% of the Bank’s total assets, amounting to $504.1 million, as compared to $516.0 million at June 30, 2024. Advances from the FHLB - San Francisco are typically secured by the Bank’s single-family residential, multi-family and commercial real estate mortgage loans. Total mortgage loans pledged to the FHLB - San Francisco were $734.4 million at June 30, 2025 and $774.1 million at June 30, 2024. In addition, the Bank pledged investment securities totaling $4.7 million and $3.9 million at June 30, 2025 and 2024, respectively, to collateralize its FHLB - San Francisco advances under the Securities-Backed Credit (“SBC”) facility. At June 30, 2025 and 2024, the Bank had $213.0 million and $238.5 million of outstanding borrowings from the FHLB - San Francisco with a weighted average interest rate of 4.59% and 4.88%, respectively. At June 30, 2025, the outstanding borrowings mature between 2025 and 2028 with a weighted average maturity of 10 months.
In addition to the borrowings mentioned above, the Bank utilized its borrowing facility for letters of credit and credit enhancement for loans previously sold to the FHLB - San Francisco under the Mortgage Partnership Finance (“MPF”) program which have a recourse liability. The letters of credit are used to collateralize the local agency deposits. The outstanding letters of credit were $8.5 million and $16.0 million at June 30, 2025 and 2024; while the outstanding MPF credit enhancement was $216,000 at both June 30, 2025 and 2024.
As of June 30, 2025 and 2024, the remaining financing availability through the FHLB - San Francisco was $282.3 million and $261.3 million, with remaining available collateral of $364.9 million and $367.4 million, respectively.
As of June 30, 2025 and 2024, the Bank also had secured a discount window facility of $142.5 million and $208.6 million at the FRB of San Francisco, respectively. As of June 30, 2025, the Bank deposited $24.8 million of investment securities and $227.0 million of loans held for investment as collateral, compared to a total of $126.6 million of investment securities and $178.6 million of loans held for investment deposited as collateral under the discount window facility at June 30, 2024. As of June 30, 2025 and 2024, there were no outstanding borrowings under the discount window facility at both dates.
At June 30, 2025 and 2024, the Bank also maintained a federal funds facility with its correspondent bank for $50.0 million, maturing on March 31, 2026 and June 30, 2025, respectively. There were no outstanding borrowings under this facility at either date.
As a member of the FHLB - San Francisco, the Bank is required to maintain a minimum investment in FHLB - San Francisco stock. The Bank held the required investment in stock at June 30, 2025 and 2024 of $9.6 million with no excess investment at both dates.
During fiscal 2025 and 2024, the Bank purchased FHLB - San Francisco capital stock totaling $0 and $63,000, respectively, and did not redeem any of the capital stock during both periods. In fiscal 2025 and 2024, the FHLB - San Francisco distributed cash dividends to the Bank totaling $835,000 and $793,000, respectively.
Subsidiary Activities
Federal savings institutions generally may invest up to 3% of their assets in service corporations, provided that at least one-half of any amount in excess of 1% is used primarily for community, inner-city and community development projects. The Bank’s investment in its service corporations did not exceed these limits at June 30, 2025 and 2024.
The Bank has three wholly owned subsidiaries: PFC, Profed Mortgage, Inc., and First Service Corporation. PFC’s current activities include: (i) acting as trustee for the Bank’s real estate transactions and (ii) holding real estate for investment, if any. Profed Mortgage, Inc and First Service Corporation are currently inactive. In fiscal 2025 and 2024, the Bank contributed capital of $10,000 and $0 to PFC, respectively. At June 30, 2025 and 2024, the Bank’s investment in all its combined subsidiaries totaled $14,000 and $8,000, respectively.
REGULATION
The following is a brief description of certain laws and regulations which are applicable to the Corporation and the Bank. The description of these laws and regulations, as well as descriptions of laws and regulations contained elsewhere herein, do not purport to be complete and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the applicable laws and regulations. Legislation is introduced from time to time in the United States Congress (“Congress”) that may affect the Corporation’s and the Bank’s operations. In addition, the regulations governing the Corporation and the Bank may be amended from time to time by the OCC, FDIC, FRB and SEC, as appropriate. Any such legislation or regulatory changes in the future could adversely affect the operations and financial condition of the Corporation and the Bank. The Bank cannot predict whether any such changes may occur.
General
The Bank, as a federally chartered savings institution, is subject to extensive regulation, examination and supervision by the OCC, as its primary federal regulator, and the FDIC, as its insurer of deposits. The Bank's relationship with its depositors and borrowers is regulated by federal consumer protection laws, which must be complied with by the Bank. The Bank is a member of the FHLB System and its deposits are insured up to applicable limits by the FDIC. The Bank must file reports with the OCC concerning its activities and financial condition in addition to obtaining regulatory approvals prior to entering into certain transactions such as mergers with, or acquisitions of, other financial institutions. There are periodic examinations by the OCC to evaluate the Bank’s safety and soundness and compliance with various regulatory requirements. This regulatory structure establishes a comprehensive framework of activities in which the Bank may engage and is intended primarily for the protection of the insurance fund and depositors. The regulatory structure also gives the regulatory authorities extensive discretion in connection with their supervisory and enforcement activities and examination policies, including policies with respect to the classification of assets and the establishment of adequate allowance for credit losses for regulatory purposes. Any change in such policies, whether by the OCC, the FRB, the FDIC or Congress, could have a material adverse impact on the Corporation and the Bank and their operations. The Corporation, as a savings and loan holding company, is required to file certain reports with, is subject to examination by, and otherwise must comply with the rules and regulations of the FRB, its primary regulator. The Corporation is also subject to the rules and regulations of the SEC under the federal securities laws. For additional information, see “Savings and Loan Holding Company Regulations” below in this Form 10-K.
Set forth below is a brief description of material regulatory requirements that are applicable to the Bank and the Corporation. The description is limited to certain material aspects of the statutes and regulations addressed, and is not intended to be a complete description of such statutes and regulations and their effects on the Bank and the Corporation.
Federal Regulation of Savings Institutions
Office of the Comptroller of the Currency. The OCC has extensive authority over the operations of federal savings institutions. As part of this authority, the Bank is required to file periodic reports with the OCC and is subject to periodic examinations by the OCC. The OCC also has extensive enforcement authority over all federal savings institutions, including the Bank. This enforcement authority includes, among other things, the ability to assess civil money penalties, issue cease-and-desist or removal orders and initiate prompt corrective action orders. In general, these enforcement actions may be initiated for violations of laws and regulations and unsafe or unsound practices. Other actions or inactions may provide the basis for enforcement action, including misleading or untimely reports filed with the OCC. Except under certain circumstances, public disclosure of final enforcement actions by the OCC is required by law.
All federal savings institutions must pay assessments to the OCC, to fund the agency’s operations. The general assessments, paid on a semi-annual basis, are determined based on the savings institution’s total assets, including
consolidated subsidiaries. The Bank’s OCC annual assessments for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2025 and 2024 were $167,000 and $179,000, respectively.
The Bank’s general permissible lending limit for loans to one borrower is equal to the greater of $500,000 or 15% of unimpaired capital and surplus (except for loans fully secured by certain readily marketable collateral, in which case this limit is increased to 25% of unimpaired capital and surplus). The Bank’s limit on loans to one borrower, or group of related borrowers, at June 30, 2025 and 2024 was $19.7 million and $20.1 million, respectively. At June 30, 2025, the Bank’s largest lending relationship to a single borrower or group of related borrowers consisted of four multi-family loans totaling $4.9 million, which were performing according to their original payment terms.
Effective July 1, 2019, the OCC issued a final rule implementing a section of the Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief and Consumer Protection Act (“EGRRCPA”) which permits an eligible federal savings bank with assets of $20.0 billion or less as of December 31, 2017 to elect to operate with the business powers of a national bank, generally subject to the same limitations and restrictions, without converting to a national bank charter. A federal savings bank that makes the so-called “covered savings association” election must divest any activities or investments that are not permitted for a national bank. The Bank had not made such an election as of June 30, 2025.
Federal Home Loan Bank System. The Bank is a member of the FHLB - San Francisco, which is one of 11 regional FHLBs, each of which serves as a reserve or central bank for its members within its assigned region. The FHLB - San Francisco is funded primarily from proceeds derived from the sale of consolidated obligations of the FHLB System. It makes loans or advances to members in accordance with policies and procedures, established by the Board of Directors of the FHLB, which are subject to the oversight of the Federal Housing Finance Agency. All advances from the FHLB are required to be fully secured by sufficient collateral as determined by the FHLB - San Francisco. At June 30, 2025 and 2024, the Bank had $213.0 million and $238.5 million of outstanding advances, respectively, from the FHLB - San Francisco with a remaining available credit facility of $282.3 million and $261.3 million, respectively, based on 40% of total assets for both dates, which is limited to available collateral. For additional information, see “Business - Deposit Activities and Other Sources of Funds - Borrowings” above in this Form 10-K.
As a member of the FHLB - San Francisco, the Bank is required to purchase and maintain stock in the FHLB - San Francisco. At June 30, 2025 and 2024, the Bank held $9.6 million of FHLB - San Francisco stock at both dates which were in compliance with this membership requirement. During fiscal 2025 and 2024, the Bank was required to purchase $0 and $63,000 of FHLB - San Francisco stock, respectively, and the Bank did not redeem any capital stock during both periods. In fiscal 2025 and 2024, the FHLB - San Francisco distributed cash dividends to the Bank totaling $835,000 and $793,000, respectively. There is no guarantee in the future that the FHLB - San Francisco will pay cash dividends or redeem excess stock held by its members.
Under federal law, the FHLB - San Francisco is required to contribute to low and moderately priced housing programs through direct loans or interest subsidies on advances targeted for community investment and low and moderate income housing projects. These contributions have in the past adversely affected the level of dividends paid by the FHLB - San Francisco and could continue to do so in the future. These contributions also could have an adverse effect on the value of FHLB - San Francisco stock in the future. A reduction in value of the Bank’s FHLB - San Francisco stock may result in a corresponding reduction in the Bank’s capital.
Insurance of Accounts and Regulation by the FDIC. The Deposit Insurance Fund (“DIF”) of the FDIC insures deposits up to $250,000 per account owner as defined by the FDIC, backed by the full faith and credit of the United States. As an insurer, the FDIC imposes deposit insurance premiums in the form of assessments to maintain the DIF and is authorized to conduct examinations of and to require reporting by FDIC insured institutions. On October 18, 2022, the FDIC adopted a final rule to increase its initial base insurance assessment rate schedules by two basis points to improve the likelihood that the reserve ratio of the DIF would be restored to at least 1.35% by September 30, 2028. The Bank’s FDIC annual assessments for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2025 and 2024 were $573,000 and $601,000, respectively.
Under the FDIC’s risk-based assessment system, institutions deemed less likely to fail pay lower assessments. Assessments for institutions of less than $10 billion in assets are based on financial measures and supervisory ratings derived from statistical modeling estimating the probability of an institution’s failure within three years.
The FDIC has authority to increase insurance assessments. Any significant increases would have an adverse effect on the operating expenses and results of operations of the Bank. We cannot predict what assessment rates will be in the future.
Insurance of deposits may be terminated by the FDIC upon a finding that an institution has engaged in unsafe or unsound practices, is in an unsafe or unsound condition to continue operations, or has violated any applicable law, regulation, rule, order or condition imposed by the FDIC. We do not know of any practice, condition or violation that may lead to termination of the Bank’s deposit insurance.
Qualified Thrift Lender Test. Like all savings institutions (subject to a narrow exception not applicable to the Bank), the Bank is required to meet a qualified thrift lender (“QTL”) test to avoid certain restrictions on its operations. This test requires a savings institution to have at least 65% of its total assets, as defined by regulation, in qualified thrift investments on a monthly average for nine out of every 12 months on a rolling basis. As an alternative, a savings institution may maintain 60% of its assets in those assets specified in Section 7701(a)(19) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (“Code”), as amended. Under either test, such assets primarily consist of residential housing related loans and investments.
Any savings institution that fails to meet the QTL test is subject to certain operating restrictions and may be required to convert to a national bank charter, and a savings and loan holding company of such an institution may become regulated as a bank holding company. As of June 30, 2025 and 2024, the Bank maintained 93.0% and 92.3% of its portfolio assets in qualified thrift investments, respectively, and therefore met the qualified thrift lender test at both dates. During fiscal 2025 and 2024, the Bank was in compliance with the QTL test as of each month end.
Capital Requirements. Federally insured savings institutions, such as the Bank, are required by the OCC to maintain minimum levels of regulatory capital, including a Tier 1 capital to adjusted average assets leverage ratio, a common equity Tier 1 (“CET1”) to risk-based assets ratio, a Tier 1 capital to risk-based assets ratio and a total capital to risk-based assets ratio. The capital standards require the maintenance of the following minimum capital ratios: (i) a Tier 1 leverage ratio of 4%, (ii) a CET1 capital ratio of 4.5%; (iii) a Tier 1 capital ratio of 6%; and (iv) a total capital ratio of 8%.
Mortgage servicing assets and deferred tax assets over designated percentages of CET1 are also deducted from capital. In addition, Tier 1 capital includes accumulated other comprehensive income, which includes all unrealized gains and losses on available for sale debt securities and interest-only strips. Because of the Bank’s asset size, the Bank was given a one-time option to permanently opt-out of the inclusion of unrealized gains and losses on available for sale debt securities and interest-only strips in its capital calculations. The Bank elected to exercise this option to opt-out in order to reduce the impact of market volatility on its regulatory capital levels.
The Bank also must maintain a capital conservation buffer consisting of additional CET1 capital greater than 2.5% of risk-weighted assets above the required minimum risk-based capital levels in order to avoid limitations on paying dividends, engaging in share repurchases, and paying discretionary bonuses. If the Bank does not have the ability to pay dividends to the Corporation, the Corporation may be limited in its ability to pay dividends to its stockholders.
In order to be considered well-capitalized under the prompt corrective action regulations, the Bank must maintain a minimum Tier 1 leverage capital ratio of 5%, a CET1 risk-based capital ratio of 6.5%, a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of 8% and a total risk-based capital ratio of 10% and the Bank must not be subject to certain mandates by the OCC requiring it as an individual institution to meet any specified capital level.
EGRRCPA required the federal banking agencies, including the OCC, to establish a “community bank leverage ratio” of between 8% and 10% for institutions with assets of less than $10.0 billion. Institutions with a capital level at or exceeding the ratio and otherwise meeting the specified requirements, and electing the alternative framework, are considered to comply with the applicable regulatory capital requirements, including the risk-based requirements. Final rules issued by the agencies established the community bank leverage ratio at 9% of Tier 1 capital to adjusted average assets, effective January 1, 2020. A qualifying institution may opt in or out of the community bank leverage ratio framework on its quarterly Call Report. An institution that temporarily ceases to meet any qualifying criteria is provided with a two quarter grace period to regain compliance. Failure to meet the qualifying criteria within the grace period or maintain a leverage ratio of 8% or greater requires the institution to comply with the generally applicable regulatory capital requirements. The Corporation did not opt in to the community bank leverage ratio framework for the year ended June 30, 2025.
The FASB has issued a new accounting standard, ASC 326, for U.S. GAAP that was adopted by the Corporation on July 1, 2023. This standard, referred to as Current Expected Credit Loss or CECL requires all entities holding financial instruments that are not accounted for at fair value to recognize credit losses expected over the life of certain financial assets. CECL covers a broader range of assets than the previous method of recognizing credit losses and generally results in earlier recognition of credit losses. Upon adoption of CECL, a banking organization must record a one-time adjustment to its credit loss allowances as of the beginning of the fiscal year of adoption equal to the difference, if any, between the amount of credit loss allowances under the current methodology and the amount required under CECL. For a banking organization, implementation of CECL is generally likely to reduce retained earnings, and to affect other items, in a manner that reduces its regulatory capital. The federal banking regulators (the FRB, the OCC and the FDIC) have adopted a rule that gives a banking organization the option to phase in over a three-year period the day-one adverse effects of CECL on its regulatory capital. The Bank elected to recognize the full $824,000 adjustment to retained earnings resulting from the adoption of CECL on July 1, 2023, instead of over the permitted three-year phase-in option.
Prompt Corrective Action. An institution is considered adequately capitalized if it meets the minimum capital ratios described above. The OCC is required to take certain supervisory actions against undercapitalized savings institutions, the severity of which depends upon the institution's degree of undercapitalization. Subject to a narrow exception, the OCC is required to appoint a receiver or conservator for a savings institution that is "critically undercapitalized." OCC regulations also require that a capital restoration plan be filed with the OCC within 45 days of the date a savings institution receives notice that it is "undercapitalized," "significantly undercapitalized" or "critically undercapitalized." Numerous mandatory supervisory actions become immediately applicable to an undercapitalized institution, including, but not limited to, increased monitoring by regulators and restrictions on growth, capital distributions and expansion. In addition, “significantly undercapitalized” and “critically undercapitalized” institutions are subject to even more extensive mandatory regulatory actions. The OCC also may take any one of a number of discretionary supervisory actions, including the issuance of a capital directive and the replacement of senior executive officers and directors.
As of June 30, 2025, the most recent notification from the OCC categorized the Bank as “well capitalized” under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action. See Note 9 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.
Limitations on Capital Distributions. OCC regulations impose various restrictions on savings institutions and on their ability to make distributions of capital, which include dividends, stock redemptions or repurchases, cash-out mergers and other transactions charged to the capital account. Generally, savings institutions, such as the Bank, that before and after the proposed distribution are well-capitalized, may make capital distributions during any calendar year up to 100% of net income for the year-to-date plus retained net income for the two preceding years, without regulatory approval. However, an institution deemed to be in need of more than normal supervision or in troubled condition by the OCC may have its dividend authority restricted by the OCC. If the Bank, however, proposes to make a capital distribution when it does not meet its capital requirements (or will not following the proposed capital distribution) or that will exceed these net income-based limitations, it must obtain the OCC's approval prior to making such distribution. In addition, the Bank must file a prior written notice of a dividend with the FRB. The FRB or the OCC may object to a capital distribution based on safety and soundness concerns. Further restrictions on Bank’s dividends may apply if the Bank fails the QTL test. In addition, as noted above, if the Bank does not have the required capital conservation buffer, its ability to pay dividends to the Corporation will be limited, which may limit the ability of the Corporation to pay dividends to its stockholders.
Activities of Savings Associations and Their Subsidiaries. When a savings institution establishes or acquires a subsidiary or elects to conduct any new activity through a subsidiary that the savings institution controls, the savings institution must file a notice or application with the OCC and in certain circumstances with the FDIC and receive regulatory approval or non-objection. Savings institutions also must conduct the activities of subsidiaries in accordance with existing regulations and orders. With respect to subsidiaries generally, the OCC may determine that investment by a savings institution in, or the activities of, a subsidiary must be restricted or eliminated based on safety and soundness or legal reasons.
Transactions with Affiliates. The Bank’s authority to engage in transactions with “affiliates” is limited by Sections 23A and 23B of the Federal Reserve Act as implemented by the FRB’s Regulation W. The term “affiliates” for these purposes generally mean any company that controls or is under common control with an institution except subsidiaries of the institution. The Corporation and its non-savings institution subsidiaries are affiliates of the Bank. In general, transactions
with affiliates must be on terms that are as favorable to the institution as comparable transactions with non-affiliates. In addition, certain types of transactions are restricted to an aggregate percentage of the institution’s capital. Institutions are prohibited from lending to any affiliate that is engaged in activities that are not permissible for bank holding companies and no savings institution may purchase the securities of any affiliate other than a subsidiary. FDIC-insured institutions are subject, with certain exceptions, to certain restrictions on extensions of credit to their parent holding companies or other affiliates, on investments in the stock or other securities of affiliates and on the taking of such stock or securities as collateral from any borrower. Collateral in specified amounts must be provided by affiliates in order to receive loans from an institution. In addition, these institutions are prohibited from engaging in certain tying arrangements in connection with any extension of credit or the providing of any property or service.
Community Reinvestment Act. Under the Community Reinvestment Act of 1977 (“CRA”), every FDIC-insured institution has a continuing and affirmative obligation consistent with safe and sound banking practices to help meet the credit needs of its entire community, including low and moderate income neighborhoods. The CRA requires that the OCC assess the Bank's record in meeting the credit needs of the communities it serves, especially low and moderate income neighborhoods. The current CRA evaluation system focuses on three tests: (1) a lending test, to evaluate the institution's record of making loans in its assessment areas; (2) an investment test, to evaluate the institution's record of investing in community development projects, affordable housing and programs benefiting low income or moderate income individuals and businesses; and (3) a service test, to evaluate the institution's delivery of banking services through its branches, ATM centers and other offices. Institutions are assigned a rating of "outstanding," "satisfactory," "needs to improve," or "substantial non-compliance." The Bank received a rating of satisfactory when it was last examined for CRA compliance.
In 2023, federal banking regulators adopted a final rule to modernize the Community Reinvestment Act (“CRA”). However, in response to legal challenges, including an injunction issued by the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas, the federal banking regulators announced in March 2025 their intention to rescind the final rule and reinstate the prior CRA framework. As a result, the Bank does not expect any material impact or significant changes to its operations or compliance obligations.
Anti-Money Laundering and Customer Identification. The Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001 (USA Patriot Act) was signed into law on October 26, 2001. The USA Patriot Act and the Bank Secrecy Act requires financial institutions to develop programs to prevent financial institutions from being used for money laundering and terrorist activities. If such activities are detected, financial institutions are obligated to file suspicious activity reports with the U.S. Treasury’s Office of Financial Crimes Enforcement Network. These rules require financial institutions to establish procedures for identifying and verifying the identity of customers seeking to open new financial accounts, and the beneficial owners of accounts. Bank regulators are directed to consider a holding company’s effectiveness in combating money laundering when reviewing mergers and acquisitions.
Regulatory and Criminal Enforcement Provisions. The OCC has primary enforcement responsibility over federally chartered savings institutions and has the authority to bring action against all “institution-affiliated parties,” including stockholders, attorneys, appraisers and accountants who knowingly or recklessly participate in wrongful action likely to have an adverse effect on an insured institution. Formal enforcement action may range from the issuance of a capital directive or cease-and-desist order to removal of officers or directors, receivership, conservatorship or termination of deposit insurance. Civil penalties cover a wide range of violations and can be nearly $2.0 million per day per violation in especially egregious cases. The FDIC has the authority to recommend to the OCC that enforcement action be taken with respect to a particular savings institution. If the OCC does not take action, the FDIC has authority to take such action under certain circumstances. Federal law also establishes criminal penalties for certain violations.
Standards for Safety and Soundness. As required by statute, the federal banking agencies have adopted interagency guidelines prescribing standards for safety and soundness. The guidelines set forth the safety and soundness standards that the federal banking agencies use to identify and address problems at insured depository institutions before capital becomes impaired. If the OCC determines that a savings institution fails to meet any standard prescribed by the guidelines, the OCC may require the institution to submit an acceptable plan to achieve compliance with the standard.
Federal Reserve System. The FRB requires that all depository institutions maintain reserves on transaction accounts or non-personal time deposits. These reserves may be in the form of cash or noninterest-bearing deposits with the regional
FRB. Interest-bearing checking accounts and other types of accounts that permit payments or transfers to third parties fall within the definition of transaction accounts and are subject to Regulation D reserve requirements, as are any non-personal time deposits at a bank. Effective March 26, 2020, the FRB reduced reserve requirement ratios to 0%, which eliminated reserve requirements for all depository institutions.
Environmental Issues Associated with Real Estate Lending. The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (“CERCLA”), is a federal statute, that generally imposes strict liability on all prior and present "owners and operators" of sites containing hazardous waste. However, Congress acted to protect secured creditors by providing that the term "owner and operator" excludes a person whose ownership is limited to protecting its security interest in the site. Since the enactment of the CERCLA, this “secured creditor exemption” has been the subject of judicial interpretations which have left open the possibility that lenders could be liable for cleanup costs on contaminated property that they hold as collateral for a loan.
To the extent that legal uncertainty exists in this area, all creditors, including the Bank, that have made loans secured by properties with potentially hazardous waste contamination (such as petroleum contamination) could be subject to liability for cleanup costs, which often substantially exceed the value of the collateral property.
Privacy and Cybersecurity Regulations. Federal regulations generally require that the Bank disclose its privacy policy, including identifying with whom it shares a customer’s “non-public personal information,” to customers at the time of establishing the customer relationship and annually thereafter. In addition, the Bank is required to provide its customers with the ability to “opt-out” of having their personal information shared with unaffiliated third parties and not to disclose account numbers or access codes to non-affiliated third parties for marketing purposes. In addition, the California Consumer Privacy Act of 2018 (the "CCPA"), which became effective on January 1, 2020, gives California residents the right to request disclosure of information collected about them, and whether that information has been sold or shared with others, the right to request deletion of personal information (subject to certain exceptions), the right to opt out of the sale of personal information, and the right not to be discriminated against for exercising these rights. The CCPA also created a private right of action with statutory damages for data security breaches, thereby increasing potential liability associated with a data breach, which has triggered a number of class actions against other companies since January 1, 2020. Although the Bank may enjoy several fairly broad exemptions from the CCPA's privacy requirements, those exemptions do not extend to the private right of action for a data security breach. The CCPA, including any amendments thereto or final regulations implemented thereunder, as well as other similar state data privacy laws and regulations, may require the establishment by the Bank of certain regulatory compliance and risk management controls. In addition, on November 18, 2021, the federal banking agencies announced the adoption of a final rule providing for new notification requirements for banking organizations and their service providers for significant cybersecurity incidents. Specifically, the new rule requires a banking organization to notify its primary federal regulator as soon as possible, and no later than 36 hours after, the banking organization determines that a “computer-security incident” rising to the level of a “notification incident” has occurred. Notification is required for incidents that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect the viability of a banking organization’s operations, its ability to deliver banking products and services, or the stability of the financial sector. Service providers are required under the rule to notify affected banking organization customers as soon as possible when the provider determines that it has experienced a computer-security incident that has materially affected or is reasonably likely to materially affect the banking organization’s customers for four or more hours. Compliance with the new rule was required by May 1, 2022.
In July 2023, the SEC adopted rules requiring registrants to disclose material cybersecurity incidents they experience and to disclose on an annual basis material information regarding their cybersecurity risk management, strategy, and governance. The new rules require registrants to disclose on Form 8-K any cybersecurity incident they determine to be material and to describe the material aspects of the incident's nature, scope, and timing, as well as its material impact or reasonably likely material impact on the registrant. The Corporation provided disclosures on its cybersecurity risk management and governance on this Form 10-K for fiscal year ended June 20, 2025 (See Part I, Item 1C - Cybersecurity).
Non-compliance with federal or similar state privacy and cybersecurity laws and regulations could lead to substantial regulatory imposed fines and penalties, damages from private causes of action and/or reputational harm. The Bank currently has a privacy protection policy in place and believes that such policy is in compliance with the regulations.
Other Consumer Protection Laws and Regulations. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (“CFPB”) exercises broad regulatory, supervisory and enforcement authority with respect to both new and existing consumer financial protection laws. The Bank is subject to consumer protection regulations issued by the CFPB, but as a financial institution with assets of less than $10.0 billion, the Bank is generally subject to supervision and enforcement by the OCC with respect to compliance with consumer financial protection laws and CFPB regulations.
The Bank is subject to a broad array of federal and state consumer protection laws and regulations that govern almost every aspect of its business relationships with consumers. While not exhaustive, these laws and regulations include the Truth-in-Lending Act, the Truth in Savings Act, the Electronic Fund Transfer Act, the Expedited Funds Availability Act, the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, the Fair Housing Act, the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act, the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act, the Fair Credit Reporting Act, the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, the Right to Financial Privacy Act, the Home Ownership and Equity Protection Act, the Consumer Leasing Act, the Fair Credit Billing Act, the Homeowners Protection Act, the Check Clearing for the 21st Century Act, laws governing flood insurance, laws governing consumer protections in connection with the sale of insurance, federal and state laws prohibiting unfair and deceptive business practices and various regulations that implement some or all of the foregoing. These laws and regulations mandate certain disclosure requirements and regulate the manner in which financial institutions must deal with customers when taking deposits, making loans, collecting loans and providing other services. Failure to comply with these laws and regulations can subject the Bank to various penalties, including but not limited to, enforcement actions, injunctions, fines, civil liability, criminal penalties, punitive damages and the loss of certain contractual rights.
Savings and Loan Holding Company Regulation
General. The Corporation is a unitary savings and loan holding company, subject to the regulatory oversight of the FRB. Accordingly, the Corporation is required to register and file reports with the FRB and is subject to regulation and examination by the FRB. In addition, the FRB has enforcement authority over the Corporation and its non-savings institution subsidiaries, which also permits the FRB to restrict or prohibit activities that are determined to present a serious risk to the Bank. The FRB has promulgated regulations implementing the “source of strength” doctrine that require holding companies, including savings and loan holding companies, to act as a source of financial and managerial strength to their subsidiary depository institutions by providing capital, liquidity and other support in times of financial stress. These and other FRB policies, as well as the capital conservation buffer may restrict the Corporation’s ability to pay dividends.
Capital Requirements. For a savings and loan holding company with less than $3.0 billion in consolidated assets that qualifies as a small bank holding company under the FRB’s Small Bank Holding Company Policy Statement, such as the Corporation, the capital regulations apply to its savings institution subsidiaries, but not the Corporation, unless the FRB determines otherwise in particular cases. For a description of the capital regulations, see “Federal Regulation of Savings Institutions - Capital Requirements” above.
Activities Restrictions. The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999 (“GLBA”) provides that no company may acquire control of a savings association after May 4, 1999 unless it engages only in the financial activities permitted for financial holding companies under the law or for multiple savings and loan holding companies. The GLBA also specifies, subject to a grandfather provision, that existing savings and loan holding companies may only engage in such activities. The Corporation qualifies for the grandfathering and is therefore not restricted in terms of its activities. Upon any non-supervisory acquisition by the Corporation of another savings association as a separate subsidiary, the Corporation would become a multiple savings and loan holding company and would be limited to those activities permitted by FRB regulation. Multiple savings and loan holding companies may engage in activities permitted for financial holding companies, and certain other activities including acting as a trustee under a deed of trust and real estate investments.
If the Bank were to fail the QTL test, the Corporation must, within one year of that failure, register as, and become subject to the restrictions applicable to bank holding companies. For additional information, see “Federal Regulation of Savings Institutions - Qualified Thrift Lender Test” in this Form 10-K.
Mergers and Acquisitions. The Corporation must obtain approval from the FRB before acquiring more than 5% of the voting stock of another savings institution or savings and loan holding company or acquiring such an institution or holding company by merger, consolidation or purchase of its assets. In evaluating an application for the Corporation to acquire control of a savings institution, the FRB would consider the financial and managerial resources and future prospects of the
Corporation and the target institution, the effect of the acquisition on the risk to the DIF, the convenience and the needs of the community, including performance under the CRA and competitive factors.
The FRB may not approve any acquisition that would result in a multiple savings and loan holding company controlling savings institutions in more than one state, subject to two exceptions; (i) supervisory acquisitions and (ii) the acquisition of a savings institution in another state if the laws of the state of the target savings institution specifically permit such acquisitions. The states vary in the extent to which they permit interstate savings and loan holding company acquisitions.
Acquisition of the Corporation. Any company, except a bank holding company, that acquires control of a savings association or savings and loan holding company becomes a “savings and loan holding company” subject to registration, examination and regulation by the FRB and must obtain the prior approval of the FRB under the Savings and Loan Holding Company Act before obtaining control of a savings association or savings and loan holding company. A bank holding company must obtain the prior approval of the FRB under the Bank Holding Company Act before obtaining control or more than 5% of a class of voting stock of a savings association or savings and loan holding company and remains subject to regulation under the Bank Holding Company Act. The term “company” includes corporations, partnerships, associations, and certain trusts and other entities. “Control” of a savings association or savings and loan holding company is deemed to exist if a company has voting control, directly or indirectly of more than 25% of any class of the savings association’s voting stock or controls in any manner the election of a majority of the directors of the savings association or savings and loan holding company, and may be presumed under other circumstances, including, but not limited to, holding in certain cases 10% or more of a class of voting securities. Control may be direct or indirect and may occur through acting in concert with one or more other persons. In addition, a savings and loan holding company must obtain FRB approval prior to acquiring voting control of more than 5% of any class of voting stock of another savings association or another savings association holding company. A similar provision limiting the acquisition by a bank holding company of 5% or more of a class of voting stock of any company is included in the Bank Holding Company Act.
Accordingly, the prior approval of the FRB would be required:
● before any savings and loan holding company or bank holding company could acquire 5% or more of the common stock of the Corporation; and
● before any other company could acquire 25% or more of the common stock of the Corporation, and may be required for an acquisition of as little as 10% of such stock.
In addition, persons that are not companies are subject to the same or similar definitions of control with respect to savings and loan holding companies and savings associations and requirements for prior regulatory approval by the FRB in the case of control of a savings and loan holding company or by the OCC in the case of control of a savings association not obtained through control of a holding company of such savings association.
Federal Securities Laws. Provident Financial Holdings, Inc.’s common stock is registered with the SEC under Section 12(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (“Exchange Act”). The Corporation is subject to information, proxy solicitation, insider trading restrictions and other requirements under the Exchange Act.
Dividends and Stock Repurchases. The FRB’s policy statement on the payment of cash dividends applicable to savings and loan holding companies expresses its view that a savings and loan holding company must maintain an adequate capital position and generally should not pay cash dividends unless the company’s net income for the past year is sufficient to fully fund the cash dividends and that the prospective rate of earnings appears consistent with the company’s capital needs, asset quality, and overall financial condition. The FRB policy statement also indicates that it would be inappropriate for a company experiencing serious financial problems to borrow funds to pay dividends.
In addition, a savings and loan holding company is required to give the FRB prior written notice of any purchase or redemption of its outstanding equity securities if the gross consideration for the purchase or redemption, when combined with the net consideration paid for all such purchases or redemptions during the preceding 12 months, is equal to 10% or more of its consolidated net worth. The FRB may disapprove such a purchase or redemption if it determines that the proposal would constitute an unsafe or unsound practice or would violate any law, regulation, FRB order or any condition imposed by, or written agreement with, the FRB. As discussed above, the capital conservation buffer requirements may also limit or preclude dividends payable by the Corporation.
TAXATION
Federal Taxation
General. The Corporation reports its income on a fiscal year basis using the accrual method of accounting and is subject to federal income taxation in the same manner as other corporations with some exceptions, including particularly the Bank’s reserve for bad debts discussed below. The following discussion of tax matters is intended only as a summary and does not purport to be a comprehensive description of the tax rules applicable to the Corporation.
Tax Bad Debt Reserves. As a result of legislation enacted in 1996, the reserve method of accounting for bad debt reserves was repealed for tax years beginning after December 31, 1995. Due to such repeal, the Bank is no longer able to calculate its deduction for bad debts using the percentage-of-taxable-income or the experience method. Instead, the Bank is permitted to deduct as bad debt expense its specific charge-offs during the taxable year. In addition, the legislation required savings institutions to recapture into taxable income, over a six-year period, their post 1987 additions to their bad debt tax reserves. As of the effective date of the legislation, the Bank had no post 1987 additions to its bad debt tax reserves. As of June 30, 2025, the Bank’s total pre-1988 bad debt reserve for tax purposes was approximately $9.0 million. Under current law, a savings institution will not be required to recapture its pre-1988 bad debt reserve unless the Bank makes a “non-dividend distribution” as defined below. Currently, the Bank uses the specific charge-off method to account for bad debt deductions for income tax purposes.
Distributions. In the event that the Bank makes “non-dividend distributions” to Provident that are considered as made from the reserve for losses on qualifying real estate property loans, to the extent the reserve for such losses exceeds the amount that would have been allowed under the experience method or from the supplemental reserve for losses on loans (“Excess Distributions”), then an amount based on the amount distributed will be included in the Bank’s taxable income. Non-dividend distributions include distributions in excess of the Bank’s current and accumulated earnings and profits, distributions in redemption of stock, and distributions in partial or complete liquidation. However, dividends paid out of the Bank’s current or accumulated earnings and profits, as calculated for federal income tax purposes, will not be considered to result in a distribution from the Bank’s bad debt reserve. Thus, any dividends to Provident that would reduce amounts appropriated to the Bank’s bad debt reserve and deducted for federal income tax purposes would create a tax liability for the Bank. The amount of additional taxable income attributable to an Excess Distribution is an amount that, when reduced by the tax attributable to the income, is equal to the amount of the distribution. Thus, if the Bank makes a “non-dividend distribution,” then approximately one and one-half times the amount distributed will be included in taxable income for federal income tax purposes. For additional information, see "Regulation - Federal Regulation of Savings Institutions - Limitations on Capital Distributions” in this Form 10-K for limits on the payment of dividends by the Bank. The Bank does not intend to pay dividends that would result in a recapture of any portion of its tax bad debt reserve. During fiscal 2025, the Bank declared and paid $9.0 million of cash dividends to Provident, while Provident declared and paid $3.8 million of cash dividends to shareholders.
Excise Tax on Stock Repurchases. The Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 imposed a one percent excise tax on the value of corporate share repurchases (net of issuance). On June 28, 2024, the Department of Treasury and Internal Revenue Services issued the final regulation that provide guidance on how to report and pay the excise tax on stock repurchases. The excise tax is a non-deductible tax of one percent of the fair market value of the Corporation’s stock repurchases, net of restricted stock distributions, stock option exercises, ESOP repurchases and contributions and other qualified activities, occurring after December 31, 2022 in excess of $1.0 million. The excise tax on the stock repurchases in fiscal 2025 and 2024 was $43,000 and $26,000, respectively.
Tax Effect from Stock-Based Compensation. During fiscal 2025, 23,825 shares of restricted common stock vested and were distributed to employees. No non-qualified stock options were exercised, and no incentive stock options exercised as disqualifying dispositions. During the fiscal year, 197,168 shares of non-qualified stock options expired or forfeited, and 25,675 shares of restricted stock were forfeited.
Other Matters. The Internal Revenue Service has audited the Bank’s income tax returns through 1996 and the California Franchise Tax Board has audited the Bank through 1990. Also, the Internal Revenue Service completed a review of the Corporation’s income tax returns for fiscal 2006 and 2007; and the California Franchise Tax Board completed a review of the Corporation’s income tax returns for fiscal 2009 and 2010. Fiscal 2023 and fiscal years thereafter remain subject to
federal examination, while the California state tax returns for fiscal 2022 and fiscal years thereafter are subject to examination by state taxing authorities. On April 7, 2025, the California Francise Tax Board sent a tax examination letter for fiscal 2021 and 2022, and as of June 30, 2025, all of the requested documents have been provided.
State Taxation
California. The California franchise tax rate applicable to the Bank equals the franchise tax rate applicable to corporations generally, plus an “in lieu” rate of 2%, which is approximately equal to personal property taxes and business license taxes paid by such corporations (but not generally paid by banks or financial corporations such as the Corporation). At June 30, 2025, the Corporation’s net state tax rate was 8.6%. Bad debt deductions are available in computing California franchise taxes using the specific charge-off method. The Bank and its California subsidiaries file California franchise tax returns on a combined basis. The Corporation will be treated as a general corporation subject to the general corporate tax rate.
Delaware. As a Delaware holding company not earning income in Delaware, the Corporation is exempted from Delaware corporate income tax, but is required to file an annual report with and pay an annual franchise tax to the State of Delaware. During fiscal 2025, the Corporation paid franchise taxes of $200,000.
Employees and Human Capital
As of June 30, 2025, the Bank had 163 full-time equivalent employees, which consisted of 95 full-time, 90 prime-time and no part-time employees. The employees are not represented by a collective bargaining unit and management believes that its relationship with employees is good.
To facilitate talent attraction and retention, we strive to make the Bank an inclusive, safe and healthy workplace, with opportunities for our employees to grow and develop in their careers, supported by market-based compensation, benefits, health and welfare programs. At June 30, 2025, approximately 69.8% of our workforce was female and 30.2% male, and our average employee tenure was approximately 8.5 years, up slightly from an average employee tenure of 8.3 years at June 30, 2024. The ethnicity of our workforce was 36.5% White, 44.8% Hispanic or Latino, 7.8% African American or Black, 5.2% Asian, 3.6% two or more races, 0.5% American Indian or Alaskan Native and 1.6% Not Specified. As part of our compensation philosophy, we offer and maintain market competitive compensation programs for our employees in order to attract and retain superior talent. In addition to strong base wages, additional programs include quarterly or annual bonus opportunities, an Employee Stock Ownership Plan, a Corporation-matched 401(k) Plan, healthcare and insurance benefits, flexible spending accounts, accrued vacation and sick time, family leave, and an employee assistance program.
The success of our business is fundamentally connected to the well-being of our people. Accordingly, we are committed to the health, safety, and wellness of our employees. In support of our commitment, we provide our employees and their families with access to a variety of flexible and convenient health and welfare programs, including benefits that support their physical and mental health by providing tools and resources to help them improve or maintain their health status; and that offer choice, where possible, so they can customize their benefits to meet their needs and the needs of their families.
A core value of our talent management approach is to both develop talent from within and supplement with external hires. This approach has yielded loyalty and dedication in our employee base which in turn grows our business, our commitment to our communities, and our customers, while adding new employees and external ideas supports a continuous improvement mindset. We believe that our average employee tenure of over eight years reflects the engagement of our employees in this talent management philosophy. Turnover for employees, as measured by terminated employees to the average total employees, was 24.3% in fiscal 2025, up slightly from 23.3% in fiscal 2024.
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
The following table sets forth information with respect to the executive officers of Provident and the Bank:
Position
Name
Age(1)
Provident
Bank
Donavon P. Ternes
President and
President and
Chief Executive Officer
Chief Executive Officer
Peter C. Fan
Senior Vice President and
Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
Chief Financial Officer
Corporate Secretary
Corporate Secretary
Robert "Scott" Ritter
-
Senior Vice President
Single-Family Division
David S. Weiant
-
Senior Vice President
Chief Lending Officer
Gwendolyn L. Wertz
-
Senior Vice President
Retail Banking Division
(1) As of June 30, 2025.
Biographical Information
Set forth below is certain information regarding the executive officers of the Corporation and the Bank. There are no family relationships among or between any director, executive officer, or person nominated or chosen by the Corporation to become a director or executive officer.
Donavon P. Ternes has served as the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Bank and Corporation since January 2024. Mr. Ternes joined the Bank and the Corporation in 2000 as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer and was appointed Corporate Secretary in April 2003. In January 2008, he was promoted to Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer, while continuing to serve as Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Secretary. In June 2011, Mr. Ternes was named President in addition to his roles as Chief Operating Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and Corporate Secretary. Prior to joining the Bank, Mr. Ternes served for more than 11 years as President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and Director of Mission Savings and Loan Association.
Peter C. Fan was appointed Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, and Corporate Secretary of Provident and the Bank effective May 12, 2025. Mr. Fan previously served as Senior Vice President - Director of Finance and Treasury at Royal Business Bank since February 2024 and prior to that, as Senior Vice President - Finance at Pacific Western Bank from April 2014 to February 2024.
Robert "Scott" Ritter joined the Bank as Senior Vice President in September 2016 and currently oversees the single-family mortgage operations. Prior to joining the Bank, Mr. Ritter was the Chief Operating Officer at California Mortgage Advisors since November 2011 where he was responsible for overseeing all of California Mortgage Advisors' operations, including product development, underwriting, loan processing and information technology. He has also held positions with increasing responsibilities at mortgage banking firms such as Green Point Financial and its predecessor Headlands Mortgage Company, among others.
David S. Weiant joined the Bank as Senior Vice President and Chief Lending Officer in June 2007. Prior to joining the Bank, Mr. Weiant was a Senior Vice President of Professional Business Bank where he was responsible for commercial lending in the Los Angeles and Inland Empire regions of Southern California.
Gwendolyn L. Wertz joined the Bank as Senior Vice President of Retail Banking in February 2014. Prior to joining the Bank, Ms. Wertz was with CommerceWest Bank, where she was responsible for commercial banking, treasury management and specialty banking services. Ms. Wertz was also with Opportunity Bank, N.A. where she was responsible for the commercial treasury sales and service team. Ms. Wertz has more than 35 years of experience with financial institutions, with a majority in senior management roles. Her experience includes depository growth initiatives, operations, compliance and deposit acquisition management.

---

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
Item 1A. Risk Factors
We assume and manage a certain degree of risk in order to conduct our business. In addition to the risk factors described below, other risks and uncertainties not specifically mentioned, or that are currently known to, or deemed by, management to be immaterial may also materially and adversely affect our financial position, results of operation and/or cash flows. Before making an investment decision, you should carefully consider the risks described below together with all of the other information included in this Form 10-K. If any of the circumstances described in the following risk factors actually occur, the value of our common stock could decline and you could lose all or part of your investment.
Risks Related to Macroeconomic Conditions
Our business may be adversely affected by downturns in the national economy and the regional economies on which we depend.
As of June 30, 2025, approximately 64% of our real estate loans were secured by collateral and made to borrowers located in Southern California, with the balance located predominantly throughout the rest of California. Accordingly, our financial performance is closely tied to economic conditions in these areas. A downturn in local or regional economic conditions, as a result of inflation, rising interest rates, unemployment, recessions, natural disasters, or other adverse events, could materially affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Changes in U.S. immigration policies, particularly those that could lead to mass deportations, may disrupt key industries in our region such as agriculture, construction, and manufacturing. These disruptions could exacerbate labor shortages, reduce productivity, and cause financial instability among affected businesses, impairing the repayment abilities of borrowers in these sectors.
Global geopolitical tensions, including international conflicts, sanctions, trade disputes, and tariffs, could further disrupt manufacturing, agriculture, and transportation in our markets, leading to higher costs, reduced investment, supply chain delays, and lower credit demand. Such instability may also increase cybersecurity threats, including those from state-sponsored actors, heightening operational and reputational risk.
A deterioration in economic conditions in our market areas could result in:
●higher loan delinquencies, problem assets and foreclosures;
●an increase in our ACL;
●the slowing of sales of foreclosed assets;
●a decline in demand for our products and services;
● a decline in the value of collateral for loans may in turn reduce customers' borrowing power, and the value of assets and collateral associated with existing loans;
●the net worth and liquidity of loan guarantors may decline, impairing their ability to honor commitments to us; and
●a decrease in the amount of our low cost or noninterest-bearing deposits.
Because our loan portfolio is more geographically concentrated than those of larger financial institutions, adverse changes in California’s economy, including those tied to immigration policy shifts, may have a greater impact on our earnings and capital. Any deterioration in real estate markets could significantly affect borrowers’ repayment capabilities and collateral values. Real estate values are influenced by a range of factors, including economic conditions, regulatory changes, natural disasters (such as fires, droughts, earthquakes, and flooding), and trade-related issues affecting construction costs and
material availability. If we must liquidate a significant amount of collateral during a period of reduced real estate values, our financial condition and profitability could be adversely affected.
Monetary policy, inflation, deflation, and other external economic factors could adversely impact our financial performance and operations.
Our financial condition and results of operations are affected by credit policies of monetary authorities, particularly the FRB. Actions by monetary and fiscal authorities, including the FRB, could lead to inflation, deflation, or other economic phenomena that could adversely affect our financial performance. Higher U.S. tariffs on imported goods could exacerbate inflationary pressures by increasing the cost of goods and materials for businesses and consumers. This may particularly affect small to medium-sized businesses, as they are less able to leverage economies of scale to mitigate cost pressures compared to larger businesses. Consequently, our business customers may experience increased financial strain, reducing their ability to repay loans and adversely impacting our results of operations and financial condition. Furthermore, a prolonged period of inflation could cause wages and other costs to us to increase, which could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition. Virtually all of our assets and liabilities are monetary in nature, and as a result, interest rates tend to have a more significant impact on our performance than general levels of inflation or deflation. However, interest rates do not necessarily move in the same direction or magnitude as the prices of goods and services, creating additional uncertainty in the economic environment.
Risks Related to our Lending Activities
Our business may be adversely affected by credit risk associated with residential property.
At June 30, 2025, $544.4 million, or 52% of our loans held for investment, were secured by single-family residential real property. This type of lending is generally sensitive to regional and local economic conditions that may significantly impact the ability of borrowers to meet their loan payment obligations, making loss levels difficult to predict. Jumbo single-family loans which do not conform to secondary market mortgage requirements for our market areas are not immediately saleable in the secondary market and may expose us to increased risk because of their larger balances. Higher market interest rates, recessionary conditions or declines in the volume of single-family real estate sales and/or the sales prices as well as elevated unemployment rates, may result in higher than expected loan delinquencies or problem assets, and a decline in demand for our products and services. These potential negative events may cause us to incur losses, adversely affect our capital and liquidity and damage our financial condition and business operations.
A few of our legacy residential mortgage loans are secured by properties in which the borrowers have little or no equity because either we originated a first mortgage with an 80% loan-to-value ratio and a concurrent second mortgage for a combined loan-to-value ratio of up to 100% or because of a decline in home values in our market areas. Residential loans with high loan-to-value ratios will be more sensitive to declining property values than those with lower combined loan-to-value ratios and therefore may experience a higher incidence of default and severity of losses.
Our multi-family and commercial real estate loans involve higher principal amounts than other loans and repayment of these loans may be dependent on factors outside our control or the control of our borrowers.
We originate multi-family and commercial real estate loans for individuals and businesses for various purposes, which are secured by residential and non-residential properties. At June 30, 2025, we had $496.2 million or 48% of total loans held for investment in multi-family and commercial real estate loans. These loans typically involve higher principal amounts than other types of loans and some of our commercial borrowers have more than one loan outstanding with us. Consequently, an adverse development with respect to one loan or one credit relationship can expose us to a significantly greater risk of loss compared to an adverse development with respect to a single-family residential loan. Repayment on these loans typically is dependent upon income generated, or expected to be generated, by the property securing the loan in amounts sufficient to cover operating expenses and debt service, which may be adversely affected by changes in the economy or local market conditions. For example, if the cash flow from the borrower's project is reduced as a result of leases not being obtained or renewed, the borrower's ability to repay the loan may be impaired. Multi-family and commercial real estate loans also expose a lender to greater credit risk than loans secured by single-family residential real estate because the collateral securing these loans typically cannot be sold as easily as single-family residential real estate. In addition, many of our multi-family and commercial real estate loans are not fully amortizing and contain large balloon
payments upon maturity, which would require the borrower to either sell or refinance the underlying property to make the balloon payment at maturity, thus increasing the risk of default or non-payment.
A secondary market for many types of multi-family and commercial real estate loans is not readily liquid, so we have less opportunity to mitigate credit risk by selling part or all of our interest in these loans. As a result of these characteristics, if we foreclose on a multi-family or commercial real estate loan, our holding period for the collateral typically is longer than for a single-family residential mortgage loan because there are fewer potential purchasers of the collateral. Accordingly, charge-offs on multi-family and commercial real estate loans may be larger on a per loan basis than those incurred within the single-family residential loan portfolio.
We occasionally purchase loans in bulk or “pools.” We may experience lower yields or losses on loan “pools” because the assumptions we use when purchasing loans in bulk may not prove correct.
In order to achieve our loan growth objectives and/or improve earnings, we may purchase loans, either individually, through participations, or in bulk. We did not purchase any loans in fiscal 2025 and 2024. When we determine the purchase price we are willing to pay to purchase loans in bulk, management makes certain assumptions about, among other things, how fast borrowers will prepay their loans, the real estate market, our ability to collect on loans successfully and, if necessary, our ability to dispose of any real estate that may be acquired through foreclosure. In addition, when we purchase loans, we perform certain due diligence procedures and typically require customary limited indemnities. To the extent that our underlying assumptions prove to be inaccurate or the basis for those assumptions change, the purchase price paid for “pools” of loans may prove to have been excessive, resulting in a lower yield or a loss of some or all of the loan principal. For example, if we purchase pools of loans at a premium and some of the loans are prepaid before we modeled, we will earn less interest income on the purchase than expected. Our success in growing our loan portfolio through purchases of loan “pools” depends on our ability to price loan “pools” properly and on the general economic conditions within the geographic areas where the underlying properties of the purchased loans are located.
Acquiring loans through bulk purchases may involve acquiring loans of a type or in geographic areas where management may not have substantial prior experience. We may be exposed to a greater risk of loss to the extent that bulk purchases contain such loans.
Our allowance for credit losses may not be sufficient to absorb losses in our loan portfolio.
Our business relies significantly on the creditworthiness of our customers. To account for potential defaults and nonperformance in our loan portfolio, we maintain an ACL on loans using the CECL methodology. This allowance represents management's best estimate of the lifetime expected credit losses in our loan portfolio. The amount of this allowance is determined by management through periodic reviews and consideration of several factors, including, but not limited to:
● our collective allowance, for loans evaluated on a pool basis with similar risk characteristics based on our and peer life of loan historical loss experience, certain qualitative factors consisting of macroeconomic conditions and external factors as regulatory requirements, and reasonable and supportable forecasts relating to management’s expectations of future events; and
● our individual allowance, for evaluation of individual loans that do not share similar risk characteristics based on the present value of the expected future cash flows or the fair value of the underlying collateral, less selling costs.
The determination of the appropriate ACL involves a significant degree of subjectivity, relying on substantial estimates of both current credit risks and future trends, all of which are subject to potential material changes. Inaccuracies in our estimations could lead to an insufficient ACL, necessitating increases through provisions for credit losses, adversely impacting our recorded net income.
Included in our single-family residential loan portfolio, which comprised 52% of our total loan portfolio at June 30, 2025, were $16.9 million or 2% of total loans held for investment that were non-traditional single-family loans, which include negative amortization and more than 30-year amortization loans, stated income loans and low FICO score loans, all of which have a higher risk of default and loss than conforming residential mortgage loans. Additionally, as we acknowledge the potential impact of significant portfolio growth, new loan products, and refinancing activities, these actions may result in portfolios consisting of unseasoned loans that may not perform as anticipated, elevating the risk of an inadequate
allowance to absorb losses without additional provisions. A material decrease in the credit quality of our loan portfolio, significant changes in the risk profile of markets, industries, or customer groups, or inadequacy in the ACL could have a materially adverse impact on our business, financial condition, liquidity, capital, and results of operations.
Wildfires in California, including those that began in January 2025 and more recent events in other regions of the state, present ongoing risks to our loan portfolio. Borrowers in affected areas may experience financial hardship, which could increase loan defaults, reduce repayment capacity, and impair collateral values. Inadequate insurance coverage or denied claims may further limit recovery efforts. In addition, local economic disruptions, such as business closures and job losses, may adversely affect borrowers’ ability to meet financial obligations. Given the increasing frequency and severity of wildfires associated with climate change, we may be required to increase our allowance for loan losses. While we regularly evaluate the adequacy of our allowance, there can be no assurance that it will be sufficient to cover actual losses resulting from wildfire-related events.
Bank regulatory agencies also periodically review our ACL and may require an increase in the provision for credit losses or the recognition of further loan charge-offs, based on their judgment about information available to them at the time of their examination.
If charge-offs in future periods exceed the ACL, we may need additional provisions to increase the ACL. Any increases in the ACL will result in a decrease in net income and, most likely, capital, and may have a material negative effect on our financial condition, results of operations, liquidity and capital.
Non-performing assets take significant time to resolve and adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition and could result in further losses in the future.
Non-performing assets, consisting of non-performing loans and real estate acquired through foreclosure, adversely affect our earnings in various ways. We reverse accrued interest on non-performing loans and do not record interest income on foreclosed assets. Additionally, non-performing loans increase our loan administration costs, including increased costs related to the improvement, maintenance and repairs of the foreclosed assets. Upon foreclosure or similar proceedings, we record the repossessed asset at the estimated fair value, less costs to sell, which may result in a write-down or loss. A significant increase in the level of non-performing assets from current levels would also increase our risk profile and may impact the capital levels our regulators believe are appropriate in light of the increased risk profile. While we attempt to reduce problem assets through various means such as collection efforts, asset sales, workouts and modifications, a decline in the value of the underlying collateral or in the borrower’s performance or financial condition could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition. In addition, the resolution of non-performing assets often requires a significant time commitment from management, diverting their attention from other aspects of our operations.
Risks Related to Market and Interest Rate Changes
Fluctuating interest rates can adversely affect our profitability.
Our earnings and cash flows are largely dependent upon our net interest income, which is significantly affected by interest rates. Interest rates are highly sensitive to factors beyond our control, such as general economic conditions and policies set by governmental and regulatory bodies, particularly the FRB. Increases in interest rates could reduce our net interest income, weaken the housing market by reducing refinancing activity and home purchases, and negatively affect the broader U.S. economy, potentially leading to slower economic growth or recessionary conditions.
We principally manage interest rate risk by managing our volume and mix of our earning assets and funding liabilities. If we are unable to manage interest rate risk effectively, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially affected.
A sustained increase in market interest rates could adversely affect our earnings. As is the case with many financial institutions, we attempt to increase our proportion of deposits comprising either no or relatively low interest-bearing accounts, which has been challenging over the last couple of years. At June 30, 2025, we had $278.3 million in time deposits that mature within one year, $83.6 million in noninterest-bearing checking accounts and $492.9 million in interest-bearing checking, savings and money market accounts. We would incur a higher cost of funds to retain these deposits in a
rising interest rate environment. Earnings could also be adversely affected if the interest rates received on loans and other investments fall more quickly than the interest rates paid on deposits and borrowings.
In addition, most of our mortgage loans have adjustable interest rates. As a result, these loans may experience a higher rate of default in a rising interest rate environment.
Changes in interest rates also affect the value of our securities portfolio available for sale. Generally, the fair value of fixed-rate securities fluctuates inversely with changes in interest rates. Unrealized gains and losses on securities available for sale are reported as a separate component of stockholders’ equity, net of tax. Decreases in the fair value of securities available for sale resulting from increases in interest rates could have an adverse effect on stockholders’ equity.
While we employ asset and liability management strategies to mitigate interest rate risk, unexpected, substantial, or prolonged rate changes could materially affect our financial condition and results of operations. Additionally, our interest rate risk models and assumptions may not fully capture the impact of actual rate changes on our balance sheet or projected operating results. For additional information concerning the effect of interest rates on our loan portfolio, see Item 7A, “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk” of this Form 10-K.
Certain hedging strategies that we may use to manage investment in mortgage servicing assets, mortgage loans held for sale and interest rate lock commitments may be ineffective to offset any adverse changes in the fair value of these assets due to changes in interest rates and market liquidity.
We may use derivative instruments to economically hedge mortgage servicing assets, mortgage loans held for sale and interest rate lock commitments to offset changes in fair value resulting from changing interest rate environments. Our hedging strategies are susceptible to prepayment risk, basis risk, market volatility and changes in the shape of the yield curve, among other factors. In addition, hedging strategies rely on assumptions and projections regarding assets and general market factors. If these assumptions and projections prove to be incorrect or our hedging strategies do not adequately mitigate the impact of changes in interest rates, we may incur losses that would adversely impact earnings.
We may incur losses on our securities portfolio as a result of changes in interest rates.
Factors beyond our control can significantly impact the fair value of securities within our portfolio, potentially leading to adverse changes in their value. These factors include, but are not limited to, actions taken by rating agencies regarding the securities, defaults by the issuer, adverse events affecting either the issuer or the underlying securities, and shifts in market interest rates along with continued instability in the capital markets. These influences could result in impairments that are not just temporary, leading to realized and/or unrealized losses in future periods. Such developments could also lead to declines in other comprehensive income, thereby potentially affecting our business, financial condition, and results of operations in a significant manner. We evaluate individual investment securities quarterly for expected credit losses based on ASC 326, “Financial Instruments - Credit Losses,” since the adoption on July 1, 2023. The process usually requires complex, subjective judgments about the future financial performance and liquidity of the issuer and any collateral underlying the security to assess the probability of receiving all contractual principal and interest payments on the security. Despite our efforts to evaluate these factors, there can be no assurance that the declines in market value will not result in credit losses on these assets. Such credit losses could lead to accounting charges that might materially impact our net income and capital levels.
Risks Related to Regulatory, Legal and Compliance Matters
We are subject to an extensive body of accounting rules and best practices. Periodic changes to such rules may change the treatment and recognition of critical financial line items and affect our profitability.
Our business operations are significantly influenced by the extensive body of accounting regulations in the United States, which are subject to periodic updates and changes. Regulatory bodies, including the FASB and the SEC, periodically issue new guidance or alter existing accounting rules and reporting requirements, which can substantially impact the preparation and reporting of our financial statements. These changes may require us to adopt new accounting standards, leading to potential adjustments in how we report our financial position, performance, and risk exposures. Additionally, such
regulatory changes could necessitate retrospective application, which might result in the restatement of prior period financial statements.
One such significant change in fiscal 2024 was the implementation of the CECL model, which we adopted on July 1, 2023. Under the CECL model, financial assets carried at amortized cost, such as loans held for investment and held-to-maturity debt securities, are presented at the net amount expected to be collected. This forward-looking approach in estimating expected credit losses contrasts starkly with the prior, "incurred loss" model, which delays recognition until a loss is probable. CECL mandates considering historical experience, current conditions, and reasonable forecasts affecting collectability, leading to periodic adjustments of financial asset values. However, this forward-looking methodology, reliant on macroeconomic variables, introduces the potential for increased earnings volatility due to unexpected changes in these indicators between periods. An additional consequence of CECL is an accounting asymmetry between loan-related income, recognized periodically based on the effective interest method, and credit losses, recognized upfront at origination. This asymmetry might create the perception of reduced profitability during loan expansion periods due to the immediate recognition of expected credit losses. Conversely, periods with stable or declining loan levels might seem relatively more profitable as income accrues gradually for loans where losses had been previously recognized.
Non-compliance with the USA Patriot Act, Bank Secrecy Act, or other laws and regulations could result in fines or sanctions and limit our ability to get regulatory approval of acquisitions.
The USA Patriot and Bank Secrecy Acts require financial institutions to develop programs to prevent financial institutions from being used for money laundering and terrorist activities. If such activities are detected, financial institutions are obligated to file suspicious activity reports with the U.S. Treasury’s Office of Financial Crimes Enforcement Network. These rules require financial institutions to establish procedures for identifying and verifying the identity of customers seeking to open new financial accounts. Additionally, any perceived or actual failure to prevent money laundering or terrorist financing activities could significantly damage our reputation. These outcomes could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and growth prospects.
If our enterprise risk management framework is not effective at mitigating risk and loss, we could suffer unexpected losses and our results of operations could be materially adversely affected.
Our enterprise risk management framework seeks to achieve an appropriate balance between risk and return, which is critical to optimizing stockholder value. We have established processes and procedures intended to identify, measure, monitor, report, analyze, and control the types of risk to which we are subject to. These risks include, among others, liquidity, credit, market, interest rate, operational, legal and compliance, and reputational risk. Our framework also includes financial or other modeling methodologies that involve management assumptions and judgment. We also maintain a compliance program to identify, measure, assess, and report on our adherence to applicable laws, policies, and procedures. While we assess and improve these programs on an ongoing basis, there can be no assurance that our risk management or compliance programs, along with other related controls, will effectively mitigate risk under all circumstances, or that it will adequately mitigate any risk or loss to us. However, as with any risk management framework, there are inherent limitations to our risk management strategies as they may exist, or develop in the future, including risks that we have not appropriately anticipated or identified. If our risk management framework proves ineffective, we could suffer unexpected losses and our business, financial condition, results of operations or growth prospects could be materially adversely affected. We may also be subject to potentially adverse regulatory consequences.
Climate change and related legislative and regulatory initiatives may materially affect our business and results of operations.
The effects of climate change continue to raise significant concerns about the state of the environment. However, under the current administration, federal policy has shifted to reduce emphasis on climate change initiatives and environmental regulations. This includes scaling back federal involvement in international agreements like the Paris Agreement and easing regulatory pressures on businesses, including banks, to address climate-related risks. Legislative and regulatory proposals aimed at combating climate change may face increased scrutiny or reduced priority under this administration.
The lack of empirical data regarding the financial and credit risks posed by climate change still makes it difficult to predict its specific impact on our financial condition and results of operations. However, the physical effects of climate change,
such as more frequent and severe weather disasters, could directly affect us. For instance, such events may damage real property securing loans in our portfolios or reduce the value of that collateral. If our borrowers' insurance is insufficient to cover these losses or if insurance becomes unavailable, the value of the collateral securing our loans could be negatively affected, potentially impacting our financial condition and results of operations. Moreover, climate change may adversely affect regional and local economic activity, harming our customers and the communities in which we operate. Regardless of changes in federal policy, the effects of climate change and their unknown long-term impacts could still have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
Our litigation related costs may increase.
We are subject to a variety of legal proceedings that have arisen in the ordinary course of the Bank's business. Our involvement in litigation may increase significantly. The expenses of some legal proceedings will adversely affect our results of operations until they are resolved. Further, there can be no assurance that loan workouts and other activities will not expose us to additional legal actions, including lender liability or environmental claims.
Risks Related to Cybersecurity, Data and Fraud
We are subject to certain risks in connection with our use of technology.
Our security measures may not be sufficient to mitigate the risk of a cyber attack. Communications and information systems are essential to the conduct of our business, as we use such systems to manage our customer relationships, our general ledger and virtually all other aspects of our business. Our operations rely on the secure processing, storage, and transmission of confidential and other information in our computer systems and networks. Although we take protective measures and endeavor to modify them as circumstances warrant, the security of our computer systems, software, and networks may be vulnerable to breaches, fraudulent or unauthorized access, denial or degradation of service attacks, misuse, computer viruses, malware or other malicious code and cyber-attacks that could have a security impact. We may be required to expend significant additional resources to modify our protective measures or to investigate and remediate vulnerabilities or other exposures, and we may be subject to litigation and financial losses that are either not insured against or not fully covered through any insurance maintained by us. We could also suffer significant reputational damage.
Further, our cardholders use their debit and credit cards to make purchases from third parties or through third party processing services. As such, we are subject to risk from data breaches of such third party’s information systems or their payment processors. Such a data security breach could compromise our customer’s account information. The payment methods that we offer also subject us to potential fraud and theft by criminals, who are becoming increasingly more sophisticated, seeking to obtain unauthorized access to or exploit weaknesses that may exist in the payment systems. If we fail to comply with applicable rules or requirements for the payment methods we accept, or if payment-related data is compromised due to a breach or misuse of data, we may be liable for losses associated with reimbursing our customers for such fraudulent transactions on customers’ card accounts, as well as costs incurred by payment card issuing banks and other third parties or may be subject to fines and higher transaction fees, or our ability to accept or facilitate certain types of payments may be impaired. We may also incur other costs related to data security breaches, such as replacing cards associated with compromised card accounts or credit monitoring services. In addition, our customers could lose confidence in certain payment types, which may result in a shift to other payment types or potential changes to our payment systems that may result in higher costs.
Breaches of information security may also occur through intentional or unintentional acts by those having access to our systems, our customers’ or counterparties’ confidential information, including employees. We are continuously working to install new, and upgrade our existing, information technology systems and provide employee awareness training around ransomware, phishing, malware, and other cyber risks to further protect the Corporation against cyber risks and security breaches.
There continues to be a rise in electronic fraudulent activity, security breaches and cyber-attacks within the financial services industry, especially in the commercial banking sector due to cyber criminals targeting commercial bank accounts. We are regularly the target of attempted cyber and other security threats and must continuously monitor and develop our information technology networks and infrastructure to prevent, detect, address and mitigate the risk of unauthorized access, misuse, computer viruses and other events that could have a security impact. Insider or employee cyber and security threats
are increasingly a concern for companies, including ours. We are not aware that we have experienced any material misappropriation, loss or other unauthorized disclosure of confidential or personally identifiable information as a result of a cyber-security breach or other act, however, some of our customers may have been affected by these breaches, which could increase their risks of identity theft, debit and card fraud and other fraudulent activity that could involve their accounts with us.
Security breaches in our internet banking activities could further expose us to possible liability and damage our reputation. Increases in criminal activity levels and sophistication, advances in computer capabilities, new discoveries, vulnerabilities in third party technologies (including browsers and operating systems) or other developments could result in a compromise or breach of the technology, processes and controls that we use to prevent fraudulent transactions and to protect data about us, our customers and underlying transactions. Any compromise of our security could deter customers from using our internet banking services that involve the transmission of confidential information. We rely on internet security systems to provide the security and authentication necessary to effect secure transmission of data. Although we have developed and continue to invest in systems and processes that are designed to detect and prevent security breaches and cyber-attacks and periodically test our security, these precautions may not protect our systems from compromises or breaches of our security measures, and could result in losses to us or our customers, our loss of business and/or customers, damage to our reputation, the incurrence of additional expenses, disruption to our business, our inability to grow our online services or other businesses, additional regulatory scrutiny or penalties, or our exposure to civil litigation and possible financial liability, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our security measures may not protect us from system failures or interruptions. While we have established policies and procedures to prevent or limit the impact of systems failures and interruptions, there can be no assurance that such events will not occur or that they will be adequately addressed if they do. In addition, we outsource certain aspects of our data processing and other operational functions to certain third-party providers. While we select our third-party vendors carefully, we do not control their actions. If our third-party providers encounter difficulties including those resulting from breakdowns or other disruptions in communication services provided by a vendor, failure of a vendor to handle current or higher transaction volumes, cyber-attacks and security breaches or if we otherwise have difficulty in communicating with them, our ability to adequately process and account for transactions could be affected, and our ability to deliver products and services to our customers and otherwise conduct business operations could be adversely impacted. Replacing these third-party vendors could also entail significant delays and expense. Threats to information security also exist in the processing of customer information through various other vendors and their personnel. We cannot ensure that such breaches, failures or interruptions will not occur or, if they do occur, that they will be adequately addressed by us or the third parties on which we rely. We may not be insured against all types of losses as a result of third party failures and insurance coverage may be inadequate to cover all losses resulting from breaches, system failures or other disruptions. If any of our third-party service providers experience financial, operational or technological difficulties, or if there is any other disruption in our relationships with them, we may be required to identify alternative sources of such services, and we cannot assure that we could negotiate terms that are as favorable to us, or could obtain services with similar functionality as found in our existing systems without the need to expend substantial resources, if at all. Further, the occurrence of any systems failure or interruption could damage our reputation and result in a loss of customers and business, could subject us to additional regulatory scrutiny, or could expose us to legal liability. Any of these occurrences could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
Our business may be adversely affected by an increasing prevalence of fraud and other financial crimes.
We are susceptible to fraudulent activity that may be committed against us or our customers, which may result in financial losses or increased costs to us or our customers, disclosure or misuse of our information or our customer’s information, misappropriation of assets, privacy breaches against our customers, litigation or damage to our reputation. Such fraudulent activity may take many forms, including check fraud, electronic fraud, wire fraud, phishing, social engineering and other dishonest acts. Nationally, reported incidents of fraud and other financial crimes have increased. We have also experienced losses due to apparent fraud and other financial crimes. While we have policies and procedures designed to prevent such losses, there can be no assurance that such losses will not occur.
Risks Related to Our Business and Industry Generally
Ineffective liquidity management could adversely affect our financial results and condition.
Liquidity is essential to our business. We rely on a number of different sources in order to meet our potential liquidity demands. Our primary sources of liquidity are increases in deposit accounts, cash flows from loan payments and our securities portfolio. Borrowings also provide us with a source of funds to meet liquidity demands. An inability to raise funds through deposits, borrowings or other sources could have a substantial negative effect on our liquidity. Our access to funding sources in amounts adequate to finance our activities on terms acceptable to us could be impaired by factors that affect us specifically, or the financial services industry or economy in general. Factors that could detrimentally impact our access to liquidity sources include a decrease in the level of our business activity as a result of a downturn in the California markets in which our loans are concentrated, negative operating results, or adverse regulatory action against us. Our ability to borrow could also be impaired by factors that are not specific to us, such as a disruption in the financial markets or negative views and expectations about the prospects for the financial services industry or deterioration in credit markets. Any decline in available funding in amounts adequate to finance our activities on acceptable terms could adversely impact our ability to originate loans, invest in securities, meet our expenses, or fulfill obligations such as repaying our borrowings or meeting deposit withdrawal demands, any of which could, in turn, have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. See “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Liquidity and Capital Resources” of this Form 10-K.
We rely on other companies to provide key components of our business infrastructure.
We rely on numerous external vendors to provide products and services necessary for our day-to-day operations. Accordingly, our operations are exposed to risk that these vendors will not perform in accordance with the contracted arrangements under service level agreements. If a vendor fails to meet its contractual obligations due to changes in its organizational structure, financial condition, support for existing products and services, strategic focus, or any other reason, our operations could be disrupted, potentially causing a material adverse impact on our financial condition and results of operations. Furthermore, we could be adversely affected if a vendor agreement is not renewed or is renewed on terms less favorable to us. Regulatory agencies also require financial institutions to remain accountable for all aspects of vendor performance, including activities delegated to third parties. Additionally, disruptions or failures in the physical infrastructure or operating systems supporting our business and customers, or cyber-attacks or security breaches involving networks, systems, or devices used by our customers to access our products and services, could result in customer attrition, regulatory fines or penalties, reputational damage, reimbursement or compensation costs, and increased compliance expenses. Any of these outcomes could materially and adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.
Managing reputational risk is important to attracting and maintaining customers, investors and employees.
Threats to our reputation can come from many sources, including adverse sentiment about financial institutions generally, unethical practices, employee misconduct, failure to deliver minimum standards of service or quality, compliance deficiencies, and questionable or fraudulent activities of our customers. We have policies and procedures in place to protect our reputation and promote ethical conduct, but these policies and procedures may not be fully effective. Negative publicity regarding our business, employees, or customers, with or without merit, may result in the loss of customers, investors and employees, costly litigation, a decline in revenues and increased governmental regulation.
Our growth or future losses may require us to raise additional capital in the future, but that capital may not be available when it is needed or the cost of that capital may be exceedingly high.
We are required by federal regulatory authorities to maintain adequate levels of capital to support our operations. Our ability to raise additional capital, if needed, will depend on conditions in the capital markets at that time, which are outside of our control, and on our financial condition and performance. Accordingly, we cannot make assurances that we will be able to raise additional capital if needed on terms that are acceptable to us, or at all. If we cannot raise additional capital when needed, our ability to further expand our operations could be materially impaired and our financial condition and liquidity could be materially and adversely affected. In addition, any additional capital we obtain may dilute the interests of existing holders of our common stock. Further, if we are unable to raise additional capital when required by our bank regulators, we may be subject to adverse regulatory action.
The financial services market is undergoing rapid technological changes, and if we are unable to stay current with those changes, we will not be able to effectively compete.
The financial services market is undergoing rapid changes with frequent introductions of new technology-driven products and services. Our future success will depend, in part, on our ability to keep pace with the technological changes and to use technology to satisfy and grow customer demand for our products and services and to create additional efficiencies in our operations. We expect that we will need to make substantial investments in our technology and information systems to compete effectively and to stay current with technological changes. Some of our competitors have substantially greater resources to invest in technological improvements and will be able to invest more heavily in developing and adopting new technologies, which may put us at a competitive disadvantage. We may not be able to effectively implement new technology-driven products and services or be successful in marketing these products and services to our customers. As a result, our ability to effectively compete to retain or acquire new business may be impaired, and our business, financial condition or results of operations may be adversely affected.
Earthquakes, fires, mudslides and other natural disasters in our primary market area may result in material losses because of damage to collateral properties and borrowers' inability to repay loans.
Since our geographic concentration is in California, we are subject to earthquakes, fires, mudslides, droughts and other natural disasters. A major earthquake or other natural disaster may disrupt our business operations for an indefinite period of time and could result in material losses, although we have not experienced any losses in many years as a result of earthquake damage or other natural disaster. Although we are in an earthquake prone area, we and other lenders in the market area may not require earthquake insurance as a condition of making a loan. In addition to possibly sustaining damage to our own properties, if there is a major earthquake, fire, mudslide, or other natural disaster, we face the risk that many of our borrowers may experience uninsured property losses, or sustained job interruption and/or loss which may materially impair their ability to meet the terms of their loan obligations.
Any breach of representations and warranties made by us to our loan purchasers or credit default on our loan sales may require us to repurchase or substitute such loans we have sold.
We have previously engaged in bulk loan sales pursuant to agreements that generally require us to repurchase or substitute loans in the event of a breach of a representation or warranty made by us to the loan purchaser. Any misrepresentation during the mortgage loan origination process or, in some cases, upon any fraud or early payment default on such mortgage loans, may require us to repurchase or substitute loans. Any claims asserted against us in the future by one of our loan purchasers may result in liabilities or legal expenses that could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition. During fiscal 2025 and 2024, the Bank did not repurchase any loans. Additionally, the Bank did not have any claims or settlements for previously sold loans during fiscal 2025 and 2024.
Having net deferred tax asset or liability, the full value of which we may not be able to realize.
We recognize deferred tax assets and liabilities based on differences between the financial statement carrying amounts and the tax basis of assets and liabilities. At June 30, 2025, the net deferred tax liability was approximately $832,000, as opposed to the net deferred tax asset of $606,000 at the prior fiscal year end. The net deferred tax asset or liability results primarily from (1) deferred loan costs, (2) provision for credit losses recorded for financial reporting purposes, which were in the past significantly larger than net loan charge-offs deducted for tax reporting purposes and (3) deferred compensation, among others.
We regularly review our deferred tax assets for recoverability based on our history of earnings, expectations for future earnings and expected timing of reversals of temporary differences. Realization of deferred tax assets ultimately depends on the existence of sufficient taxable income, including taxable income in prior carryback years, as well as future taxable income. We believe the recorded net deferred tax liability at June 30, 2025 is fully realizable based on our expected future earnings; however, expected future earnings may not be realized, which could impact the deductibility of our deferred tax assets.
Regulatory changes to diversity, equity and inclusion (“DEI”) and environmental, social and governance (“ESG”) practices could impact our reputation, compliance costs, and operations.
In March 2025, the federal government issued an executive order titled “Ending Illegal Discrimination and Restoring Merit-Based Opportunity,” rescinding prior directives that promoted DEI initiatives, including Executive Order 11246 applicable to federal contractors. This order signals a shift in regulatory priorities, directing agencies to scrutinize DEI practices for consistency with federal nondiscrimination laws. The evolving regulatory environment may materially affect financial institutions, though the scope and enforcement approach remain uncertain.
As a financial services provider, we face ongoing scrutiny from regulators, investors, and the public regarding ESG and DEI commitments. Changes in federal policy may prompt reassessment of our employment practices, vendor policies, training programs, and disclosures. Institutions engaged in government contracting or federal programs could face increased compliance risks. Any required changes to our DEI or ESG strategies, could increase operational complexity and legal exposure. Moreover, some states continue to enforce affirmative action or diversity reporting requirements, adding compliance challenges.
Failure to adapt effectively to these shifting requirements could lead to reputational harm, regulatory investigations, litigation, or limitations on federal program participation. Conversely, reducing DEI commitments could negatively affect our reputation with investors, ratings agencies, employees, and communities. ESG ratings downgrades may also impact our cost of capital and access to funding. Given the unsettled regulatory landscape, we continuously monitor developments and strive to align our practices with legal obligations and stakeholder expectations. However, uncertainty remains, and misalignment could adversely affect our brand, employee morale, client relationships, and financial results.
We rely on dividends from the Bank for substantially all of our revenue at the holding company level.
We are an entity separate and distinct from our principal subsidiary, the Bank, and derive substantially all of our revenue at the holding company level in the form of dividends from that subsidiary. Accordingly, we are, and will continue to be, dependent upon dividends from the Bank to pay the principal of and interest on our indebtedness, to satisfy our other cash needs, to pay for share buybacks and to pay dividends on our common stock. The Bank's ability to pay dividends is subject to its ability to earn net income and to meet certain regulatory requirements. In the event the Bank is unable to pay dividends to us, we may not be able to pay dividends on our common stock or conduct share buybacks. Also, our right to participate in a distribution of assets upon a subsidiary's liquidation or reorganization is subject to the prior claims of the subsidiary's creditors. In fiscal 2025 and 2024, the Bank paid cash dividends to its holding company totaling $9.0 million and $7.0 million, respectively.

---

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
None.

---

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
Item 2. Properties
At June 30, 2025, the net book value of the Corporation’s properties (including land and buildings) and its furniture, fixtures and equipment was $9.3 million. The Corporation’s home office is located in Riverside, California. Including the home office, the Corporation has 13 retail banking offices, 12 of which are located in Riverside County in the cities of Riverside (5), Moreno Valley, Hemet, Sun City, Rancho Mirage, Corona, Temecula and Blythe. One office is located in Redlands, San Bernardino County, California. The Corporation owns six of the retail banking offices and has seven leased retail banking offices. The lease term maturity dates range from 2026 to 2029, some of which have remaining extension options. In the opinion of management, all properties are adequately covered by insurance, are in a good state of repair and are appropriately designed for their present and future use.

---

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
Periodically, there have been various claims and lawsuits involving the Corporation, such as claims to enforce liens, condemnation proceedings on properties in which the Corporation holds security interests, claims involving the making and servicing of real property loans, employment matters and other issues in the ordinary course of and incidental to the Corporation’s business. These proceedings and the associated legal claims are often contested and the outcome of individual matters is not always predictable. Additionally, in some actions, it is difficult to assess potential exposure because the Corporation is still in the early stages of the litigation.
The Corporation is not a party to any pending legal proceedings that it believes would have a material adverse effect on its financial condition, operations or cash flows.

---

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURE
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures
Not applicable.
PART II

---

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY
Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Market Information and Holders
The common stock of Provident Financial Holdings, Inc. is listed on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol “PROV.” At August 18, 2025, there were 405 shareholders of record, and there were approximately 1,953 investors that hold stock in nominee or “street name” accounts with brokers.
Dividends
The Corporation’s cash dividend payout policy is reviewed regularly by management and the Board of Directors. The Board of Directors has declared quarterly cash dividends on the Corporation’s common stock for consecutive quarters since September 30, 2002. Future declarations or payments of dividends will be subject to the consideration of the Corporation’s Board of Directors, which will take into account the Corporation’s financial condition, results of operations, tax considerations, capital requirements, industry standards, legal restrictions, economic conditions and other factors, including the regulatory restrictions which affect the payment of dividends by the Bank to the Corporation. Under Delaware law, dividends may be paid either out of surplus or, if there is no surplus, out of net profits for the current fiscal year and/or the preceding fiscal year in which the dividend is declared. No assurances can be given that any dividends will be paid or that, if paid, will not be reduced or eliminated in future periods. Dividends on common stock from Provident depend substantially upon receipt of dividends from the Bank, which is Provident’s predominant source of income. Management’s projections show an expectation that cash dividends will continue for the foreseeable future.
Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers
On January 23, 2025, the Corporation’s Board of Directors announced a stock repurchase plan, authorizing the purchase of up to 334,773 shares of the Corporation’s outstanding common stock over a one-year period. In connection with this January 2025 plan, the previously extended September 2023 stock repurchase plan, which was extended for an additional year on September 26, 2024, and had 21,691 shares remaining available for repurchase as of January 23, 2025, was canceled effective January 24, 2025.
The Corporation may purchase the shares from time to time in the open market or through privately negotiated transactions depending on market conditions, the capital requirements of the Corporation, and available cash that can be allocated to the stock repurchase program, among other considerations.
The table below sets forth information regarding the Corporation’s purchases of its common stock during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2025.
Maximum
Total Number of
Number of Shares
Shares Purchased as
that May Yet Be
Total Number of
Average Price
Part of Publicly
Purchased Under
Period
Shares Purchased
Paid per Share
Announced Plan
the Plan(1)
April 1, 2025 - April 30, 2025
32,672
$
14.37
32,672
260,460
May 1, 2025 - May 31, 2025
32,824
$
15.45
32,824
227,636
June 1, 2025 - June 30, 2025
10,608
$
15.59
10,608
217,028
Total
76,104
$
15.00
76,104
217,028
(1) Represents the remaining shares available for future purchases under the January 2025 stock repurchase plan.
Performance Graph
The following graph compares the cumulative total shareholder return on the Corporation’s common stock with the cumulative total return of the Nasdaq Stock Index (U.S. Stock) and Nasdaq Bank Index. Total return assumes the reinvestment of all dividends.
6/30/2020
6/30/2021
6/30/2022
6/30/2023
6/30/2024
6/30/2025
PROV
$
100.00
$
133.88
$
118.93
$
106.52
$
109.06
$
140.40
NASDAQ Stock Index
$
100.00
$
144.47
$
123.91
$
147.56
$
182.40
$
210.65
NASDAQ Bank Index
$
100.00
$
172.87
$
141.17
$
136.81
$
187.05
$
249.72
(1) Assumes that the value of the investment in the Corporation’s common stock and each index was $100 on June 30, 2020 and that all dividends were reinvested.
Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans
See Part III, Item 12 of this Form 10-K for information regarding the Corporation’s Equity Compensation Plans, which is incorporated into this Item 5 by reference.

---

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
Item 6. [Reserved]

---

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Safe-Harbor Statement
Certain matters discussed in this Form 10-K constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements relate to the Corporation’s financial condition, liquidity, results of operations, plans, objectives, future performance or business. You should not place undue reliance on these statements as they are subject to various risks and uncertainties. When considering these forward-looking statements, you should keep in mind these risks and uncertainties, as well as any cautionary statements the Corporation may make. Moreover, you should treat these statements as speaking only as of the date they are made and based only on information then actually known to the Corporation.
There are a number of important factors that could cause future results to differ materially from historical performance and these forward-looking statements. Factors which could cause actual results to differ materially from the results anticipated or implied by our forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to:
● adverse economic conditions in our local market areas or other markets where we have lending relationships;
● effects of employment levels, labor shortages, persistent inflation, recessionary pressures or slowing economic growth;
● changes in interest rate levels and the duration of such changes, including actions by the Federal Reserve, which could adversely affect our revenues and expenses, the value of assets and obligations, and the availability and cost of capital and liquidity;
● the impact of inflation and monetary and fiscal policy responses thereto, and their impact on consumer and business behavior;
● the effects of a Federal government shutdown, debt ceiling standoff, or other fiscal policy uncertainty;
● credit risks of lending activities, including loan delinquencies, loan charge-offs, changes in our allowance for credit losses (“ACL”), and provision for credit losses;
● increased competitive pressures among financial services companies, including repricing and competitors’ pricing initiatives, and their impact on our market position, loan, and deposit products;
● quality and composition of our securities portfolio and the impact of adverse changes in the securities markets;
● fluctuations in deposits;
● secondary market conditions for loans and our ability to sell loans in the secondary market;
● liquidity issues, including our ability to borrow funds or raise additional capital, if necessary;
● expectations regarding key growth initiatives and strategic priorities;
● the impact of bank failures or adverse developments at other banks and related negative press about the banking industry in general on investor and depositor sentiment;
● results of examinations of us by regulatory authorities, which may include the possibility that any such regulatory authority may, among other things, institute a formal or informal enforcement action against us or our bank subsidiary which could require us to increase our ACL, write down assets, change our regulatory capital position or affect our ability to borrow funds or maintain or increase deposits or impose additional requirements or restrictions on us, any of which could adversely affect our liquidity and earnings;
● the ability to adapt to rapid technological changes, including advancements in artificial intelligence, digital banking, and cybersecurity;
● legislative or regulatory changes, including but not limited to shifts in capital requirements, banking regulation, tax laws, or consumer protection laws;
● use of estimates in determining the fair value of assets, which may prove incorrect;
● vulnerabilities in information systems or third-party service providers, including disruptions, breaches, or attacks;
● geopolitical developments and international conflicts, including but not limited to tensions or instability in Eastern Europe, the Middle East, and Asia, or the imposition of new or increased tariffs and trade restrictions, which may disrupt financial markets, global supply chains, energy prices, or economic activity in specific industry sectors;
● staffing fluctuations in response to product demand or corporate implementation of strategies;
● our ability to pay dividends on our common stock;
● environmental, social and governance goals;
● effects of climate change, severe weather events, natural disasters, pandemics, epidemics and other public health crises, acts of war or terrorism, domestic political unrest and other external events;
● availability of appropriate insurance products in our market areas; and
● other factors described in this Form 10-K and in our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and other reports filed with and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), which are available on our website at www.myprovident.com and on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.
Forward-looking statements are based upon management’s beliefs and assumptions at the time they are made. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements included in this document or to update the reasons why actual results could differ from those contained in such statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. In light of these risks, uncertainties and assumptions, the forward-looking statements discussed in this document might not occur, and you should not put undue reliance on any forward-looking statements. These factors could cause our actual results for fiscal 2026 and beyond to differ materially from those expressed in any forward-looking statements by, or on behalf of, us and could negatively affect the Corporation’s consolidated financial condition and consolidated results of operations as well as its stock price performance.
General
Provident, a Delaware corporation, was organized in January 1996 for the purpose of becoming the holding company of the Bank upon the Bank’s conversion completed on June 27, 1996. Provident is regulated by the FRB. At June 30, 2025, the Corporation, on a consolidated basis, had total assets of $1.25 billion, total deposits of $888.8 million and total stockholders’ equity of $128.5 million. Provident has not engaged in any significant activity other than holding the stock of the Bank. Accordingly, the information set forth in this report, including financial statements and related data, relates primarily to the Bank and its subsidiaries.
The Bank, founded in 1956, is a federally chartered stock savings bank headquartered in Riverside, California. The Bank is regulated by the OCC, its primary federal regulator, and the FDIC, the insurer of its deposits. The Bank’s deposits are federally insured up to applicable limits by the FDIC. The Bank has been a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank System since 1956.
The Corporation operates in a single business segment through the Bank. The Bank's activities include attracting deposits, offering banking services and originating and purchasing single-family, multi-family, commercial real estate, construction and, to a lesser extent, other mortgage, commercial business and consumer loans. Deposits are collected primarily from 13 banking locations located in Riverside and San Bernardino counties in California. Loans are primarily originated and purchased in Southern and Northern California to be held for investment. There are various risks inherent in the Corporation’s business including, among others, the general business environment, interest rates, the California real estate market, the demand for loans, the prepayment of loans, the repurchase of loans previously sold to investors, the secondary market conditions to sell loans, competitive conditions, legislative and regulatory changes, fraud and other risks.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations is intended to assist in understanding the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation. The information contained in this section should be read in conjunction with the audited Consolidated Financial Statements and accompanying selected Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.
Critical Accounting Estimates
The discussion and analysis of the Corporation’s financial condition and results of operations is based upon the Corporation’s consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. The preparation of our consolidated financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, revenues and expenses, and the related disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities as of the reporting date. The estimates we consider most critical to understanding our financial condition and results of operations are those that require difficult, subjective, or complex judgments and that could materially change from period to period if different assumptions were used or if actual results differ from our assumptions.
For the Corporation, these critical estimates primarily relate to:
● the allowance for credit losses on loans and investment securities, and
● the provision for income taxes.
These estimates involve significant uncertainty and are based on historical experience, current conditions, and other factors management believes to be reasonable under the circumstances. We evaluate these estimates on an ongoing basis and discuss them with the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors. For a summary of our significant accounting policies, see Note 1-Summary of Significant Accounting Policies in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Allowance for Credit Losses. The ACL involves significant judgment and assumptions by management, which has a material impact on the carrying value of financial assets. The Corporation adopted ASC 326 using the prospective transition approach for all financial assets measured at amortized cost and off-balance sheet credit exposures. Results for reporting periods beginning after July 1, 2023 are presented under CECL.
As required by ASC 326, on July 1, 2023 the Corporation implemented CECL and recognized a $1.2 million one-time increase to its ACL and a net of tax charge of $824,000 to retained earnings. Under ASC 326, the ACL is a valuation account that is deducted from the related loan’s amortized cost basis to present the net amount expected to be collected on the loans. The measurement of expected credit losses is based on relevant information about past events, including historical experience, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts that affect the collectability of the reported amount.
Management believes the ACL on loans held for investment is maintained at a level sufficient to provide for expected losses on the Corporation’s loans held for investment based on historical loss experience, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts. The provision for (recovery of) credit losses is charged (credited) against operations on a quarterly basis, as necessary, to maintain the ACL at appropriate levels. Future adjustments to the ACL may be necessary and results of operations could be significantly and adversely affected as a result of economic, operating, regulatory, and other conditions beyond the Corporation’s control.
Provision for Income Taxes. Management accounts for income taxes by estimating future tax effects of temporary differences between the tax and book basis of assets and liabilities considering the provisions of enacted tax laws. These differences result in deferred tax assets and liabilities, which are included in the Corporation’s Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition. The application of income tax law is inherently complex. Laws and regulations in this area are voluminous and are often ambiguous. As such, management is required to make many subjective assumptions and judgments regarding the Corporation’s income tax exposures, including judgments in determining the amount and timing of recognition of the resulting deferred tax assets and liabilities, including projections of future taxable income. Interpretations of and guidance surrounding income tax laws and regulations change over time. As such, changes in management’s subjective assumptions and judgments can materially affect amounts recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition and Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Executive Summary and Operating Strategy
Provident Savings Bank, F.S.B., established in 1956, is a financial services company committed to serving consumers and small to mid-sized businesses in the Inland Empire region of Southern California. The Bank conducts its business
operations as Provident Bank and through its subsidiary, PFC. The business activities of the Corporation, primarily through the Bank, consist of community banking and, to a lesser degree, investment services for customers and trustee services on behalf of the Bank.
Community banking operations primarily consist of accepting deposits from customers within the communities surrounding the Bank’s full service offices and investing those funds in single-family, multi-family and commercial real estate loans. Also, to a lesser extent, the Bank originates construction, commercial business, consumer and other mortgage loans. The primary source of income in community banking is net interest income, which is the difference between the interest income earned on loans and investment securities, and the interest expense paid on interest-bearing deposits and borrowed funds. Additionally, certain fees are collected from depositors, such as returned check fees, deposit account service charges, ATM fees, IRA/KEOGH fees, safe deposit box fees, wire transfer fees and overdraft protection fees, among others.
The Corporation plans to enhance its community banking business by moderately increasing its total assets, focusing on expanding single-family, multi-family, commercial real estate, construction, and commercial business loans. Additionally, the Corporation aims to reduce the percentage of retail time deposits in its deposit base while increasing the proportion of lower-cost checking and savings accounts. To diversify its deposit funding base, the Corporation will consider utilizing brokered certificates of deposit and public funds, subject to market conditions and funding needs. This strategy is designed to improve core revenue by achieving a higher net interest margin and, combined with the Corporation’s growth, ultimately increase net interest income. While the Corporation’s long-term strategy targets moderate growth, management acknowledges that this growth may be influenced by general economic conditions and other factors.
Investment services operations primarily consist of selling alternative investment products such as annuities and mutual funds to the Bank’s depositors. Investment services and trustee services contribute a very small percentage to gross revenue.
PFC performs trustee services for the Bank’s real estate secured loan transactions and has in the past held, and may in the future hold, real estate for investment.
There are a number of risks associated with the business activities of the Corporation, many of which are beyond the Corporation’s control, including: changes in accounting principles, laws, regulation, interest rates and the economy, among others. The Corporation attempts to mitigate many of these risks through prudent banking practices, such as interest rate risk management, credit risk management, operational risk management, and liquidity risk management.
The California economic environment presents heightened risk to the Corporation, particularly with respect to real estate values and loan delinquencies. Because the majority of the Corporation’s loans are secured by real estate located in California, significant declines in California property values could limit the Corporation’s ability to recover on defaulted loans through the sale of the underlying collateral. Within commercial real estate, the office sector continues to face elevated risk, driven by higher vacancy rates, slower leasing activity, and downward pressure on rental rates in certain California markets. These trends may negatively affect collateral values and the repayment capacity of borrowers. In response, the Bank has evaluated its existing loans collateralized by office properties for outsized concentrations and has implemented tighter underwriting standards for such collateral. At June 30, 2025, our commercial real estate portfolio totaled $72.8 million, of which $39.5 million, or 54.2%, was secured by various types of office properties, representing 3.8% of the total loan portfolio. While current credit performance within the office segment remains satisfactory, management continues to monitor the portfolio closely in light of evolving market conditions.
The January 2025 wildfires in Los Angeles, California did not have a material direct impact on the Bank’s customers or collateral in our market area. However, those events, along with more recent wildfires in other regions of the state, underscore the ongoing risks wildfires present to our loan portfolio. Potential indirect impacts include increased insurance premiums, stricter underwriting standards, shifts in property values, and localized economic disruptions such as business closures and job losses, all of which could elevate credit risk. Borrowers in affected areas may face financial hardship that could reduce repayment capacity and impair collateral values, particularly where insurance coverage is inadequate or claims are denied. Given the increasing frequency and severity of wildfires associated with climate change, these events could require higher provisions for loan losses. The Corporation remains committed to prudent risk management practices to mitigate potential impacts and support customers in navigating any related financial challenges.
For further details on risk factors and uncertainties, see “Safe-Harbor Statement” included above in this Item 7, and Item 1A, "Risk Factors.”
Comparison of Financial Condition at June 30, 2025 and 2024
Total assets decreased $26.6 million, or 2%, to $1.25 billion at June 30, 2025 from $1.27 billion at June 30, 2024. The decrease was primarily attributable to decreases in investment securities and loans held for investment.
Total cash and cash equivalents, primarily excess cash deposited with the FRB of San Francisco, increased $1.7 million, or 3%, to $53.1 million at June 30, 2025 from $51.4 million at June 30, 2024. The increase was consistent with the Corporation’s strategy of adequately managing credit and liquidity risk.
Total investment securities (held to maturity and available for sale) decreased $20.9 million, or 16%, to $111.0 million at June 30, 2025 from $131.9 million at June 30, 2024. The decrease was the result of scheduled and accelerated principal payments on investment securities. During fiscal 2025, the Bank purchased $981,000 of investment securities and did not sell any investment securities; while during fiscal 2024, the Bank did not purchase or sell any investment securities. For additional information on investment securities, see Note 2 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.
Loans held for investment, net decreased $7.2 million, or 1%, to $1.05 billion at June 30, 2025 as compared to June 30, 2024. Total loan principal payments in fiscal 2025 were $133.3 million, up 33% from $99.9 million in fiscal 2024, while the Bank originated $122.7 million of loans held for investment in fiscal 2025, up 62% from $75.5 million in fiscal 2024. In both years these loans consisted primarily of single-family, multi-family and commercial real estate loans. The Bank did not purchase any loans in fiscal 2025 or 2024. Management attributes the increase in loan originations to the decision to increase or maintain the total balance of loans held for investment in response to higher loan prepayments in fiscal 2025. The balance of multi-family, commercial real estate, construction and commercial business loans, net of undisbursed loan funds, decreased $34.7 million, or 7%, to $497.9 million at June 30, 2025, from $532.6 million at June 30, 2024, representing 48% and 51% of loans held for investment, respectively. The balance of single-family loans held for investment increased $26.3 million, or 5%, to $544.4 million at June 30, 2025, from $518.1 million at June 30, 2024. There was no REO in fiscal 2025 and 2024. For additional information on loans held for investment, see Note 3 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.
FHLB - San Francisco stock and other equity investments increased $190,000, or 2%, to $10.3 million at June 30, 2025, from $10.1 million at June 30, 2024. The increase was primarily due to a higher fair value adjustment of other equity investments, which consist solely of 1,297 shares of VISA Class C stock. As of June 30, 2025 and 2024, the fair value of these other equity investments was $730,000 and $540,000, respectively. The Bank did not purchase additional FHLB - San Francisco stock during fiscal 2025, while in fiscal 2024, the Bank purchased $63,000 of FHLB - San Francisco stock.
Total deposits increased to $888.8 million at June 30, 2025 from $888.3 million at June 30, 2024. Transaction accounts decreased $38.0 million, or 6%, to $576.5 million at June 30, 2025 from $614.5 million at June 30, 2024, while time deposits increased $38.4 million, or 14%, to $312.3 million at June 30, 2025 from $273.9 million at June 30, 2024. Time deposits included brokered certificates of deposit of $131.0 million as of June 30, 2025, down slightly from $131.8 million at June 30, 2024. As of June 30, 2025 and 2024, the percentage of transaction accounts to total deposits was 65% and 69%, respectively. Total retail deposits, defined as total deposits excluding brokered certificates of deposit, increased to $757.8 million at June 30, 2025 from $756.5 million at June 30, 2024. This increase was due primarily to the increase in retail time deposits, which was largely offset by the decline in transaction account balances as some customers sought higher interest rates elsewhere. For additional information on deposits, see Note 6 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.
Borrowings, consisting primarily of FHLB - San Francisco advances, decreased $25.4 million, or 11%, to $213.1 million at June 30, 2025 from $238.5 million at June 30, 2024. The decrease was primarily due to scheduled maturities that were not fully renewed. The weighted average maturity of the Corporation’s FHLB - San Francisco advances was approximately 10 months at June 30, 2025, down from 13 months at June 30, 2024. For additional information on borrowings, see Note 7 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.
Total stockholders’ equity decreased $1.4 million, or 1%, to $128.5 million at June 30, 2025 from $129.9 million at June 30, 2024, primarily as a result of stock repurchases (see Part II, Item 5, “Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities” of this Form 10-K) and quarterly cash dividends paid to shareholders, partly offset by net income and the amortization of stock-based compensation in fiscal 2025.
Comparison of Operating Results for the Fiscal Years Ended June 30, 2025 and 2024
General. The Corporation recorded net income of $6.3 million, or $0.93 per diluted share, for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2025, down $1.1 million, or 15%, from $7.4 million, or $1.06 per diluted share, for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2024. The decrease in net income was primarily attributable to a $2.3 million increase in non-interest expense and a $410,000 decrease in non-interest income, partly offset by a $666,000 recovery of credit losses recorded during fiscal 2025 as compared to a $63,000 recovery of credit losses during fiscal 2024, and a $546,000 increase in net interest income. The Corporation's efficiency ratio, defined as non-interest expense divided by the sum of net interest income and non-interest income, increased to 79% in fiscal 2025 from 73% in fiscal 2024 due primarily to an increase in non-interest expenses. Return on average assets in fiscal 2025 was 0.50% compared to 0.57% in fiscal 2024, and return on average stockholders' equity in fiscal 2025 was 4.79%, compared to 5.62% in fiscal 2024.
Net Interest Income. Net interest income increased $546,000, or 2%, to $35.5 million in fiscal 2025 from $34.9 million in fiscal 2024. This increase reflects higher loan yields and the repricing of adjustable-rate loans, which outpaced increases in interest expense on deposits and borrowings. The net interest margin increased 15 basis points to 2.93% in fiscal 2025 from 2.78% in fiscal 2024. The average balance of interest-earning assets decreased $42.2 million, or 3%, to $1.21 billion in fiscal 2025 from $1.25 billion in fiscal 2024. The average balance of interest-bearing liabilities decreased $39.4 million, or 3%, to $1.10 billion during fiscal 2025 as compared to $1.14 billion during fiscal 2024.
Interest Income. Total interest income increased $1.9 million, or 3%, to $56.6 million in fiscal 2025 from $54.7 million in fiscal 2024. The increase was primarily attributable to an increase of interest income on loans receivable.
Interest income on loans receivable increased $2.3 million, or 5%, to $52.5 million in fiscal 2025 from $50.2 million in fiscal 2024. The increase was attributable to a higher average loan yield, partly offset by a lower average loan balance. The weighted average loan yield during fiscal 2025 increased 31 basis points to 5.00% from 4.69% in fiscal 2024, reflecting new loans being originated at higher interest rates and adjustable rate loans repricing higher due to overall higher market interest rates. The average balance of loans receivable decreased $18.2 million, or 2%, to $1.05 billion during fiscal 2025 from $1.07 billion during fiscal 2024.
Interest income on investment securities decreased $202,000, or 10%, to $1.9 million in fiscal 2025 from $2.1 million in fiscal 2024, due to a decrease in the average balance, partly offset by an increase in the average yield. The average balance of investment securities decreased $23.1 million, or 16%, to $121.4 million in fiscal 2025 from $144.5 million in fiscal 2024 mainly as a result of scheduled and accelerated principal payments on mortgage-backed securities. The average yield on investment securities increased 10 basis points to 1.53% for fiscal 2025 from 1.43% for fiscal 2024. The increase in the average yield of investment securities was primarily attributable to a lower premium amortization resulting from lower principal payments. The total premium amortization in fiscal 2025 was $374,000, down $158,000, or 30%, from $532,000 in fiscal 2024.
During fiscal 2025, the Bank received $845,000 of cash dividends from the FHLB - San Francisco and other equity investments, an increase of $43,000, or 5%, from the $802,000 of cash dividends received in fiscal 2024, resulting in an average yield of 8.27% during fiscal 2025 compared to 8.35% during fiscal 2024. The average balance of these investments was $10.2 million during fiscal 2025, up 6% from $9.6 million during fiscal 2024.
Interest income on interest-earning deposits, primarily cash deposited at the FRB of San Francisco, decreased $296,000, or 18%, to $1.4 million in fiscal 2025 from $1.7 million in fiscal 2024, due to a lower average yield and, to a lesser extent, a lower average balance. The average yield decreased 69 basis points to 4.69% in fiscal 2025 from 5.38% in fiscal 2024, resulting from decreases in the targeted federal funds interest rates during fiscal 2025. The average balance of interest-earning deposits decreased $1.6 million, or 5%, to $29.0 million in fiscal 2025 from $30.6 million in fiscal 2024.
Interest Expense. Total interest expense for fiscal 2025 was $21.2 million compared to $19.8 million for fiscal 2024, an increase of $1.4 million or 7%. This increase was primarily attributable to a higher interest expense on deposits, particularly time deposits, partly offset by a lower interest expense on borrowings. The average cost of interest-bearing liabilities was 1.93% during fiscal 2025, up 19 basis points from 1.74% during fiscal 2024, while the average balance of interest-bearing liabilities was $1.10 billion during fiscal 2025, down $39.4 million, or 3%, from $1.14 billion during fiscal 2024.
Interest expense on deposits for fiscal 2025 was $11.2 million compared to $9.7 million for fiscal 2024, an increase of $1.5 million or 16%. The increase was primarily attributable to a higher average balance of time deposits and modestly higher rates on time deposits and savings accounts. The average balance of time deposits increased $34.6 million, or 14%, to $282.5 million in fiscal 2025 from $247.9 million in fiscal 2024, while the average balance of transaction accounts decreased $69.0 million, or 10%, to $599.2 million in fiscal 2025 from $668.2 million in fiscal 2024. The time deposits include brokered certificates of deposit. The average balance of brokered certificates of deposit in fiscal 2025 was $134.0 million with the average cost of 4.65% compared to the average balance of $118.8 million with the average cost of 5.17% in fiscal 2024. The average cost of time deposits (including brokered certificates of deposit) in fiscal 2025 was 3.73%, up seven basis points, from 3.66% in fiscal 2025, while the average cost of transaction accounts was 0.12% in fiscal 2025, up three basis points from 0.09% in fiscal 2024. The average cost of all deposits (including non-interest bearing deposits) increased 21 basis points to 1.27% in fiscal 2025 from 1.06% in fiscal 2024.
Interest expense on borrowings, consisting primarily FHLB - San Francisco advances, for fiscal 2025 decreased $212,000, or 2%, to $9.9 million as compared to $10.1 million in fiscal 2024. The decrease in interest expense on borrowings was due to a lower average balance, partly offset by a higher average cost. The average balance of borrowings decreased $5.1 million, or 2%, to $216.3 million during fiscal 2025 from $221.4 million during fiscal 2024 and the average cost of borrowings was 4.59% in fiscal 2025, up one basis point from 4.58% in fiscal 2024.
Provision for (Recovery of) Credit Losses. During fiscal 2025, the Corporation recorded a recovery of credit losses of $666,000, compared to a recovery of $63,000 during fiscal 2024. The increase in the recovery of credit losses in fiscal 2025 was primarily due to improved qualitative factors related to the single-family residential loans and lower historical loss rates, partially offset by an increase in the balance of single-family loans.
At June 30, 2025, the ACL on loans held for investment was $6.4 million, comprised of all collectively evaluated allowances, down 9% from $7.1 million at June 30, 2024. The ACL on loans as a percentage of gross loans held for investment was 0.62% at June 30, 2025, compared to 0.67% at June 30, 2024. The decrease in the ACL on loans was due primarily to the recovery of credit losses recorded in fiscal 2025.
The following chart quantifies the factors contributing to the changes in the ACL on loans held for investment (“LHFI”) for the years ended June 30, 2025 and 2024.
Management believes, based on currently available information, that the ACL is sufficient to absorb expected credit losses in loans held for investment at June 30, 2025 and 2024. The ACL is determined in accordance with ASC 326, which requires the recognition of expected credit losses over the contractual life of the loans, considering historical loss experience, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts. For additional information, see Item 1, “Business - “Asset Quality” in this Form 10-K.
Non-Interest Income. Total non-interest income was $3.5 million in fiscal 2025, a decrease of $410,000 or 10% from $3.9 million in fiscal 2024, due primarily to decreases in card and processing fees and other non-interest income.
Loan servicing and other fees increased $82,000, or 24%, to $419,000 in fiscal 2025 from $337,000 in fiscal 2024, due primarily to higher late fees on loans.
Deposit account fees decreased $42,000, or 4%, to $1.1 million in fiscal 2025 from $1.2 million in fiscal 2024, due primarily to lower non-sufficient funds fees, associated with fewer transactions.
Card and processing fees decreased $119,000, or 9%, to $1.3 million in fiscal 2025 from $1.4 million in fiscal 2024, due primarily to fewer debit card transactions.
Other non-interest income decreased $331,000, or 31%, to $735,000 in fiscal 2025 from $1.1 million in fiscal 2024. The prior year included a $540,000 net gain on other equity investments from the VISA share conversion, partly offset by a $190,000 positive fair value adjustment on the VISA equity investment in fiscal 2025.
Non-Interest Expense. Total non-interest expense was $30.8 million in fiscal 2025, an increase of $2.3 million or 8% from $28.5 million in fiscal 2024. The increase in non-interest expense was primarily attributable to increases in salaries and employee benefits, equipment expense and other non-interest expenses.
Salaries and employee benefits increased $1.4 million, or 8%, to $19.0 million in fiscal 2025 from $17.6 million in fiscal 2024. The increase in salaries and employee benefits was primarily attributable to increases in compensation costs, incentive compensation, group insurance costs and executive search costs.
Equipment expense increased $233,000, or 18%, to $1.5 million in fiscal 2025 from $1.3 million in fiscal 2024, due primarily to higher software license and maintenance costs.
Other non-interest expenses increased $594,000, or 20%, to $3.6 million in fiscal 2025 from $3.0 million in fiscal 2024, primarily attributable to higher litigation settlement expenses, debit card operation costs, deposit related costs and other operating costs. During fiscal 2025, the Bank recognized a $232,000 expense related to the settlement of wage and hour claims under California’s Private Attorneys General Act filed by former employees. The claims, which were previously stayed pending mediation, were resolved through a global settlement agreement in February 2025. No litigation reserve had been established prior to the settlement, which does not include any admission of liability and remains subject to court approval.
Provision for Income Taxes. The income tax provision reflects accruals for taxes at the applicable rates for federal income tax and California franchise tax based upon reported pre-tax income, adjusted for the effect of all permanent differences between income for tax and financial reporting purposes, such as non-deductible stock-based compensation and bank-owned life insurance policies, among others. Therefore, there are fluctuations in the effective income tax rate from period to period based on the relationship of net permanent differences to income before taxes.
The provision for income taxes was $2.6 million for fiscal 2025, representing an effective tax rate of 29.5%, down $418,000 or 14% from $3.0 million in fiscal 2024, representing an effective tax rate of 29.2%. The decrease in the provision for income taxes in fiscal 2025 compared to fiscal 2024 was due primarily to a lower income before the provision for income taxes.
The Corporation’s effective tax rate may differ from the estimated tax rates described above due to discrete items such as further adjustments to net deferred tax assets or liabilities, excess tax benefits derived from stock option exercises and non-taxable earnings from bank owned life insurance, among other items. The Corporation determined that the above tax rates meet its estimated income tax obligations. For additional information, see Note 8, "Income Taxes," of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, contained in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.
Average Balances, Interest and Average Yields/Costs
The following table sets forth certain information for the periods regarding average balances of assets and liabilities as well as the total dollar amounts of interest income from average interest-earning assets and interest expense on average interest-bearing liabilities and average yields and costs thereof. Yields and costs for the periods indicated are derived by dividing income or expense by the average daily balance of assets or liabilities, respectively, for the periods presented.
Year Ended June 30,
Average
Yield/
Average
Yield/
(Dollars In Thousands)
Balance
Interest
Cost
Balance
Interest
Cost
Interest-earning assets:
Loans receivable, net(1)
$
1,051,448
$
52,543
5.00
%
$
1,069,616
$
50,194
4.69
%
Investment securities
121,399
1,858
1.53
%
144,466
2,060
1.43
%
FHLB - San Francisco and other equity investments
10,213
8.27
%
9,601
8.35
%
Interest-earning deposits
28,990
1,378
4.69
%
30,610
1,674
5.38
%
Total interest-earning assets
1,212,050
56,624
4.67
%
1,254,293
54,730
4.36
%
Noninterest-earning assets
30,352
30,655
Total assets
$
1,242,402
$
1,284,948
Interest-bearing liabilities:
Checking and money market accounts(2)
$
363,859
0.05
%
$
407,938
0.07
%
Savings accounts
235,390
0.21
%
260,249
0.12
%
Time deposits
282,489
10,536
3.73
%
247,863
9,063
3.66
%
Total deposits(3)
881,738
11,226
1.27
%
916,050
9,666
1.06
%
Borrowings
216,290
9,929
4.59
%
221,368
10,141
4.58
%
Total interest-bearing liabilities
1,098,028
21,155
1.93
%
1,137,418
19,807
1.74
%
Noninterest-bearing liabilities
13,710
16,731
Total liabilities
1,111,738
1,154,149
Stockholders’ equity
130,664
130,799
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
$
1,242,402
$
1,284,948
Net interest income
$
35,469
$
34,923
Interest rate spread(4)
2.74
%
2.62
%
Net interest margin(5)
2.93
%
2.78
%
Ratio of average interest- earning assets to average interest-bearing liabilities
110.38
%
110.28
%
(1) Includes the average balance of non-performing loans of $2.1 million and $2.1 million, as well as net deferred loan costs of $1.4 million and $955 thousand for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2025 and 2024, respectively.
(2) Includes the average balance of noninterest-bearing checking accounts of $88.2 million and $97.3 million in the fiscal years ended June 30, 2025 and 2024, respectively.
(3) Includes the average balance of uninsured deposits of $127.1 million and $135.7 million in the fiscal years ended June 30, 2025 and 2024, respectively.
(4) Represents the difference between the weighted average yield on all interest-earning assets and the weighted average rate on all interest-bearing liabilities.
(5) Represents net interest income as a percentage of average interest-earning assets.
Rate/Volume Variance
The following table sets forth the effects of changing rates and volumes on interest income and expense of the Corporation for the period presented. Information is provided with respect to the effects attributable to changes in volume (changes in volume multiplied by prior rate), the effects attributable to changes in rate (changes in rate multiplied by prior volume) and the effects attributable to changes that cannot be allocated between rate and volume.
Year Ended June 30, 2025 Compared
To Year Ended June 30, 2024
Increase (Decrease) Due to
(In Thousands)
Rate
Volume
Rate/Volume
Net
Interest-earning assets:
Loans receivable(1)
$
3,257
$
(852)
$
(56)
$
2,349
Investment securities
(330)
(23)
(202)
FHLB - San Francisco and other equity investments
(8)
-
Interest-bearing deposits
(220)
(87)
(296)
Total net change in income on interest-earning assets
3,180
(1,218)
(68)
1,894
Interest-bearing liabilities:
Checking and money market accounts
(78)
(31)
(100)
Savings accounts
(30)
(22)
Time deposits
1,267
1,473
Borrowings
(233)
(1)
(212)
Total net change in expense on interest-bearing liabilities
1,348
Net increase (decrease) in net interest income
$
2,815
$
(2,191)
$
(78)
$
(1) Includes non-performing loans. For purposes of calculating volume, rate and rate/volume variances, non-performing loans were included in the weighted average balance outstanding.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
The Bank’s primary sources of funds are deposits, proceeds from principal and interest payments on loans, proceeds from the maturity and sale of investment securities, proceeds from FHLB - San Francisco advances, access to the discount window facility at the FRB of San Francisco and access to the correspondent bank’s federal funds facility. While maturities and scheduled amortization of loans and investment securities are a relatively predictable source of funds, deposit flows and mortgage prepayments are greatly influenced by general interest rates, economic conditions and competition.
The primary investing activity of the Bank has been the origination and, to a lesser extent, purchase of loans held for investment. During the fiscal years ended June 30, 2025 and 2024, the Bank originated loans held for investment of $122.7 million and $75.5 million, respectively. The Bank did not purchase any loans held for investment from other financial institutions in fiscal 2025 or 2024. At June 30, 2025 and 2024, the Bank had loan origination commitments totaling $6.1 million and $9.4 million, with undisbursed loan funds of $582,000 and $435,000, respectively. The Bank anticipates that it will have sufficient funds available to meet its current loan origination commitments.
The Bank's primary financing activity is gathering deposits, which include both retail and brokered certificates of deposit. During the fiscal year ended June 30, 2025, the net increase in deposits was $424,000, compared to the net decrease of $62.2 million during fiscal 2024. On June 30, 2025, time deposits scheduled to mature in one year or less were $278.3 million. Historically, the Bank has been able to retain a significant percentage of its time deposits as they mature by adjusting deposit rates based upon the current interest rate environment.
The Bank must maintain an adequate level of liquidity to ensure the availability of sufficient funds to support loan growth and deposit withdrawals, to satisfy financial commitments and to take advantage of investment opportunities. The Bank generally maintains sufficient cash and cash equivalents to meet short-term liquidity needs. At June 30, 2025, total cash and cash equivalents were $53.1 million, or 4.3% of total assets. Depending on market conditions and the pricing of deposit products and FHLB - San Francisco advances, the Bank may continue to rely on FHLB - San Francisco advances for part
of its liquidity needs. As of June 30, 2025, the remaining financing availability at the FHLB - San Francisco was $282.3 million and the remaining available collateral was $364.9 million. In addition, the Bank has a $142.5 million discount window facility at the FRB of San Francisco, collateralized by $24.8 million of investment securities and $227.0 million of loans held for investment. The Bank also has a federal funds facility with a correspondent bank for $50.0 million which matures on March 31, 2026. As of June 30, 2025, there were no outstanding borrowings under the discount window facility or the federal funds facility with the correspondent bank. The total available borrowing capacity across all sources was approximately $474.8 million at June 30, 2025.
Regulations require the Bank to maintain adequate liquidity to assure safe and sound operations. The Bank's average liquidity ratio (defined as the ratio of average qualifying liquid assets to average deposits and borrowings) for the quarter ended June 30, 2025 decreased to 8.9% from 16.6% during the same quarter ended June 30, 2024. The decrease in the liquidity ratio was due primarily to the decrease in average qualifying liquid assets which exceeded the decrease in average deposits and borrowings during the quarter ended June 30, 2025 in comparison to the quarter ended June 30, 2024. Despite the decrease, the Bank continues to maintain sufficient liquidity, supported by borrowing capacity at the FHLB - San Francisco, the FRB of San Francisco, and its correspondent bank, and management believes the current liquidity position is adequate to meet operational needs and regulatory requirements. Management believes that, given these sources and ongoing liquidity management practices, the Bank is well-positioned to meet funding requirements. Management will continue to adjust the balance of liquid assets and funding sources as necessary to maintain adequate liquidity and support the Bank’s operations and lending activities.
We incur capital expenditures on an ongoing basis to expand and improve our product offerings, enhance and modernize our technology infrastructure, and to introduce new technology-based products to compete effectively in our markets. We evaluate capital expenditure projects based on a variety of factors, including expected strategic impacts (such as forecasted impact on revenue growth, productivity, expenses, service levels and customer retention) and our expected return on investment. The amount of capital investment is influenced by, among other things, current and projected demand for our services and products, cash flow generated by operating activities, cash required for other purposes and regulatory considerations.
Based on our current capital allocation objectives, during fiscal 2026 we project expenditures ranging from $532,000 to $1.1 million for capital investment in premises and equipment. For additional information regarding our commitments, see Note 13, "Commitments and Contingencies," of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, contained in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.
Provident is a separate legal entity from the Bank and, on a stand-alone level, must provide for its own liquidity and pay its own operating expenses, cash dividends and stock repurchases. Provident’s primary sources of funds consist of capital raised through dividends or capital distributions from the Bank, although there are regulatory restrictions on the ability of the Bank to pay dividends. During fiscal 2025, the Corporation purchased 285,170 shares of the Corporation’s common stock with a weighted average cost of $15.04 per share. As of June 30, 2025, there are 217,028 shares available for purchase under the Corporation’s existing stock repurchase plan. The Corporation purchases the shares from time to time in the open market or through privately negotiated transactions depending on market conditions, the capital requirements of the Corporation, and available cash that can be allocated to the stock repurchase program, among other considerations. In addition, we currently expect to continue our current practice of paying quarterly cash dividends on our common stock subject to our Board of Directors' discretion to modify or terminate this practice at any time and for any reason without prior notice. Our current quarterly common stock dividend rate is $0.14 per share, as approved by our Board of Directors, which we believe is a dividend rate per share which enables us to balance our multiple objectives of managing and investing in the Bank, and returning a substantial portion of our cash flow to our shareholders. Assuming continued payment during fiscal 2026 at this rate of $0.14 per share, our average total dividend paid each quarter would be approximately $921,000 based on the number of our current outstanding shares as of June 30, 2025. At June 30, 2025, Provident (on an unconsolidated basis) had liquid assets of approximately $3.4 million.
The Bank, as a federally-chartered, federally insured savings bank, is subject to the capital requirements established by the OCC. Under the OCC's capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, the Bank must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of the Bank’s assets, liabilities and certain off-balance-sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. The Bank’s capital amounts and classification are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weighting and other factors. In addition,
Provident Financial Holdings, Inc., as a savings and loan holding company registered with the FRB, is required by the FRB to maintain capital adequacy that generally parallels the OCC requirements. Since the holding company has less than $3.0 billion in assets, the capital guidelines apply on a bank only basis, and the FRB expects the holding company’s subsidiary bank to be well capitalized under the prompt corrective action regulations.
At June 30, 2025, the Bank exceeded all regulatory capital requirements. Under the prompt corrective action provisions, minimum ratios of 5.0% for Tier 1 Leverage Capital, 6.5% for CET1 Capital, 8.0% for Tier 1 Risk-based Capital and 10.0% for Total Risk-based Capital are required to be deemed “well capitalized.” As of June 30, 2025, the Bank exceeded the capital ratios needed to be considered well capitalized with Tier 1 Leverage Capital, CET1 Capital, Tier 1 Risk-based Capital and Total Risk-based Capital ratios of 10.1%, 19.5%, 19.5% and 20.5%, respectively. See also, “Regulation - Federal Regulation of Savings Institutions - Capital Requirements” and Note 9, "Capital" of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements contained in Items 1 and 8 of this Form 10-K, respectively.

---

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
Quantitative Aspects of Market Risk. The Corporation does not maintain a trading account for any class of financial instrument nor does it purchase high-risk derivative financial instruments. Furthermore, the Corporation is not subject to foreign currency exchange rate risk or commodity price risk. The primary market risk that the Corporation faces is interest rate risk. For information regarding the sensitivity to interest rate risk of the Corporation's interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, see “Interest Rate Risk” below and Item 1, “Business - Lending Activities - Maturity of Loans Held for Investment,” “- Investment Securities Activities,” and “- Deposit Activities and Other Sources of Funds - Time Deposits by Remaining Maturity” in this Form 10-K.
Interest Rate Risk. One of the Corporation's principal financial objectives is to achieve long-term profitability while reducing its exposure to fluctuating interest rates. The Corporation, through the Corporation's Asset-Liability Committee, has sought to reduce the exposure of its earnings to changes in interest rates by attempting to manage the repricing mismatch between interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. The principal element in achieving this objective is to increase the interest rate sensitivity of the Corporation's interest-earning assets by retaining new loan originations with interest rates subject to periodic adjustment to market conditions. The Corporation relies on retail deposits as its primary source of funds while utilizing brokered certificates of deposit and FHLB - San Francisco advances as secondary sources of funding. Management believes retail deposits, unlike brokered certificates of deposit, reduce the effects of interest rate fluctuations because they generally represent a more stable source of funds. As part of its interest rate risk management strategy, the Corporation promotes transaction accounts and time deposits with terms up to seven years. For additional information, see Item 7, “Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in this Form 10-K.
Through the use of an internal interest rate risk model, the Corporation is able to analyze its interest rate risk exposure by measuring the change in net portfolio value (“NPV”) over a variety of interest rate scenarios. NPV is defined as the net present value of expected future cash flows from assets, liabilities and off-balance sheet obligations. The calculation is intended to illustrate the change in NPV that would occur in the event of an immediate change in interest rates of -300, -200, -100, +100, +200 and +300 basis points (“bp”) with no effect given to steps that management might take to counter the effect of the interest rate movement. As of June 30, 2025, the targeted federal funds rate range was 4.25% to 4.50%.
The following table sets forth as of June 30, 2025 the estimated changes in NPV based on the indicated interest rate environment (dollars in thousands):
Net
Portfolio
NPV as Percentage
Basis Points ("bp")
Portfolio
NPV
Value of
of Portfolio Value
Sensitivity
Change in Rates
Value
Change(1)
Assets
Assets(2)
Measure(3)
+300 bp
$
136,140
$
(18,905)
$
1,247,388
10.91
%
(124)
bp
+200 bp
$
149,344
$
(5,701)
$
1,263,834
11.82
%
(33)
bp
+100 bp
$
156,040
$
$
1,273,820
12.25
%
bp
-
$
155,045
$
-
$
1,276,171
12.15
%
-
-100 bp
$
153,594
$
(1,451)
$
1,278,122
12.02
%
(13)
bp
-200 bp
$
141,899
$
(13,146)
$
1,269,888
11.17
%
(98)
bp
-300 bp
$
141,857
$
(13,188)
$
1,273,364
11.14
%
(101)
bp
(1)Represents the (decrease) increase of the NPV at the indicated interest rate change in comparison to the NPV at June 30, 2025 (“base case”).
(2)Calculated as the NPV divided by the total portfolio value of assets.
(3)Calculated as the change in the NPV ratio (NPV as a Percentage of Portfolio Value Assets) from the base case amount assuming the indicated change in interest rates (expressed in basis points).
The following table is derived from the internal interest rate risk model and represents the change in the NPV at a -200 bp rate shock at June 30, 2025 and +200 bp rate shock at June 30, 2024 which has been determined to be the worst scenario to the interest rate risk of the Corporation in a -200, -100, +100 and +200 bp rate shock.
At June 30, 2025
At June 30, 2024
(-200 bp rate shock)
(+200 bp rate shock)
Pre-Shock NPV Ratio: NPV as a % of PV Assets
12.15
%
10.12
%
Post-Shock NPV Ratio: NPV as a % of PV Assets
11.17
%
9.17
%
Sensitivity Measure: Change in NPV Ratio
bp
bp
The pre-shock NPV ratio increased 203 basis points to 12.15% at June 30, 2025 from 10.12% at June 30, 2024, and the post-shock NPV ratio increased 200 basis points to 11.17% (-200 basis point rate shock) at June 30, 2025 from 9.17% (+200 basis point rate shock) at June 30, 2024. The increase of the NPV ratios was primarily attributable changes in asset and liability balances, interest rates, and portfolio composition. The sensitivity measure increased to 98 basis points at June 30, 2025 from 95 basis points at June 30, 2024.
As with any method of measuring interest rate risk, certain shortcomings are inherent in the method of analysis presented in the foregoing tables. For example, although certain assets and liabilities may have similar maturities or periods to repricing, they may react in different degrees to changes in market interest rates. Also, the interest rates on certain types of assets and liabilities may fluctuate in advance of changes in market interest rates, while interest rates on other types of assets and liabilities may lag behind changes in market interest rates. Additionally, certain assets, such as ARM loans, have features that restrict changes in interest rates on a short-term basis and over the life of the asset. Further, in the event of a change in interest rates, expected rates of prepayments on loans and early withdrawals from time deposits could likely deviate significantly from those assumed when calculating the results described in the tables above. It is also possible that, as a result of an interest rate increase, the higher mortgage payments required from ARM borrowers could result in an increase in delinquencies and defaults. Accordingly, the data presented in the tables in this section should not be relied upon as indicative of actual results in the event of changes in interest rates. Furthermore, the NPV presented in the foregoing tables is not intended to present the fair market value of the Corporation, nor does it represent amounts that would be available for distribution to shareholders in the event of the liquidation of the Corporation.
The Corporation measures and evaluates the potential effects of interest rate movements through an interest rate sensitivity "gap" analysis. Interest rate sensitivity reflects the potential effect on net interest income when there is movement in interest rates. For loans, securities and liabilities with contractual maturities, the table presents contractual repricing or scheduled maturity. For transaction accounts (checking, money market and savings deposits) that have no contractual
maturity, the table presents estimated principal cash flows and, as applicable, the Corporation's historical experience, management's judgment and statistical analysis concerning their most likely withdrawal behaviors.
The following table represents the interest rate gap analysis of the Corporation’s assets and liabilities as of June 30, 2025:
Term to Contractual Repricing, Estimated Repricing, or Contractual
Maturity(1)
As of June 30, 2025
Greater than
Greater than
Greater than
12 months or
1 year to 3
3 years to
5 years or
(Dollars In Thousands)
less
years
5 years
non-sensitive
Total
Repricing Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents
$
45,856
$
-
$
-
$
7,234
$
53,090
Investment securities
6,154
-
-
104,852
111,006
Loans held for investment
292,650
229,190
214,724
309,181
1,045,745
FHLB - San Francisco and other equity investments
10,298
-
-
-
10,298
Other assets
4,215
-
-
21,259
25,474
Total assets
359,173
229,190
214,724
442,526
1,245,613
Repricing Liabilities and Equity:
Checking deposits - noninterest-bearing
-
-
-
83,566
83,566
Checking deposits - interest bearing
36,090
72,179
72,179
60,149
240,597
Savings deposits
46,122
92,244
92,244
-
230,610
Money market deposits
10,852
10,851
-
-
21,703
Time deposits
278,268
28,283
5,397
312,296
Borrowings
163,000
40,073
10,000
-
213,073
Other liabilities
1,534
-
-
13,689
15,223
Stockholders' equity
-
-
-
128,545
128,545
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity
535,866
243,630
179,820
286,297
1,245,613
Repricing gap positive (negative)
$
(176,693)
$
(14,440)
$
34,904
$
156,229
$
-
Cumulative repricing gap:
Dollar amount
$
(176,693)
$
(191,133)
$
(156,229)
$
-
$
-
Percent of total assets
(14)
%
(15)
%
(13)
%
-
%
-
%
(1) Cash and cash equivalents are presented as estimated repricing; investment securities and loans held for investment are presented as contractual maturities or contractual repricing (without consideration for prepayments); FHLB - San Francisco and other equity investments are presented as contractual repricing; transaction accounts (checking, savings and money market deposits) are presented as estimated repricing; and time deposits (without consideration for early withdrawals) and borrowings are presented as contractual maturities.
The static gap analysis under “12 months or less” duration, “Greater than 1 year to 3 years” duration and “Greater than 3 years to 5 years” duration show negative positions in the "Cumulative repricing gap - dollar amount" category, indicating more liabilities are sensitive to repricing than assets in the short and intermediate terms. Management views noninterest-bearing deposits to be the least sensitive to changes in market interest rates and these accounts are therefore characterized as long-term funding. Interest-bearing checking deposits are considered more sensitive, followed by increased sensitivity for savings and money market deposits. For the purpose of calculating gap, a portion of these interest-bearing deposit balances are assumed to be subject to estimated repricing as follows: interest-bearing checking deposits at 15% per year, savings deposits at 20% per year and money market deposits at 50% in the first and second years.
The gap results presented above are based on specific assumptions and represent a static view of interest rate risk at a point in time. Actual experience may vary if assumptions differ or if customers’ behaviors and market conditions change.
The impact of changes in prevailing interest rates on the Corporation’s net interest margin will depend on how quickly interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities adjust to rate changes. Rates on certain assets or liabilities may lag behind market rates, and factors such as loan prepayments or early deposit withdrawals can further affect cash flows. Management believes the results of the interest rate sensitivity analysis reflect the Corporation’s current asset-liability positioning, but the projected changes in net interest income assume immediate and sustained shifts in market rates and do not include any actions management might take in response. Actual results could differ materially due to variations in customer behavior, market conditions, and competitive pressures.
The Corporation also models the sensitivity of net interest income for the 12-month period subsequent to any given month-end assuming a dynamic balance sheet accounting for, among other items:
● The Corporation’s current balance sheet and repricing characteristics;
● Forecasted balance sheet growth consistent with the business plan;
● Current interest rates and yield curves and management estimates of projected interest rates;
● Embedded options, interest rate floors, periodic caps and lifetime caps;
● Repricing characteristics for market rate sensitive instruments;
● Loan, investment security, deposit and borrowing cash flows;
● Loan prepayment estimates for each type of loan; and
● Immediate, permanent and parallel movements in interest rates of +300, +200 +100, and -100, -200 and -300 bp.
The following table describes the results of the analysis at June 30, 2025 and 2024:
At June 30, 2025
At June 30, 2024
Basis Point (bp)
Change in
Basis Point (bp)
Change in
Change in Rates
Net Interest Income
Change in Rates
Net Interest Income
+300 bp
-1.35%
+300 bp
-8.12%
+200 bp
+2.01%
+200 bp
-3.45%
+100 bp
+2.23%
+100 bp
-0.51%
-100 bp
-1.80%
-100 bp
-0.67%
-200 bp
-3.24%
-200 bp
-1.15%
-300 bp
-6.38%
-300 bp
-1.86%
At June 30, 2025, the Corporation was asset sensitive as its interest-earning assets are expected to reprice more quickly than its interest-bearing liabilities during the subsequent 12-month period; while at June 30, 2024, the Corporation was close to neutral with regard to the sensitivity of net interest income as projected net interest income declines slightly under rising or declining interest rates during the subsequent 12-month period.
Therefore at June 30, 2025, in a rising interest rate environment, the model projects an increase in net interest income over the subsequent 12-month period, except at the +300 basis point scenario. In a falling interest rate environment, the results project a decrease in net interest income over the subsequent 12-month period.
Management believes that the assumptions used to complete the analysis described in the table above are reasonable. However, past experience has shown that immediate, permanent and parallel movements in interest rates will not necessarily occur. Additionally, while the analysis provides a tool to evaluate the projected net interest income to changes in interest rates, actual results may be substantially different if actual experience differs from the assumptions used to complete the analysis, particularly with respect to the 12-month business plan when asset growth is forecast. Therefore, the model results that the Corporation discloses should be thought of as a risk management tool to compare the trends of the Corporation’s current disclosure to previous disclosures, over time, within the context of the actual performance of the treasury yield curve.

---

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
Please refer to the Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in this Form 10-K and incorporated into this Item 8 by reference.

---

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
None.

---

ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures
a) An evaluation of the Corporation’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Section 13a-15(e) or 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Act”)) was carried out under the supervision and with the participation of the Corporation’s Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer), Chief Financial Officer (principal financial and accounting officer) and the Corporation’s Disclosure Committee as of the end of the period covered by this report. In designing and evaluating the Corporation’s disclosure controls and procedures, management recognizes that disclosure controls and procedures, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the disclosure controls and procedures are met. Also, because of the inherent limitations in all control procedures, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Corporation have been detected. Additionally, in designing disclosure controls and procedures, management necessarily was required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible disclosure controls and procedures. The design of any disclosure controls and procedures is also based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. Based on their evaluation, the Corporation’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Corporation’s disclosure controls and procedures as of June 30, 2025 are effective, at the reasonable assurance level, in ensuring that the information required to be disclosed by the Corporation in the reports it files or submits under the Act is (i) accumulated and communicated to the Corporation’s management (including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer) in a timely manner, and (ii) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms.
b) There have been no changes in the Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) of the Act) that occurred during the quarter ended June 30, 2025, that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting. The Corporation does not expect that its internal control over financial reporting will prevent all error and all fraud. A control procedure, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control procedure are met. Because of the inherent limitations in all control procedures, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Corporation have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the control. The design of any control procedure is also based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions; over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control procedure, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.
Management Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
This management report includes the subsidiary institution of Provident Financial Holdings, Inc. (the "Corporation"), Provident Savings Bank, F.S.B. which is subject to Part 363 in the statement of management's responsibilities; the report on management's assessment of compliance with the Federal laws and regulations pertaining to insider loans and the Federal and, if applicable, State laws and regulations pertaining to dividend restrictions; and the report on management's assessment of internal control over financial reporting.
Management of the Corporation is responsible for preparing the Corporation’s annual consolidated financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; for establishing and maintaining an adequate internal control structure and procedures for financial reporting, including controls over the preparation of regulatory financial statements in accordance with the instructions for the Parent Company Only Financial Statements for Small Holding Companies (Form FR Y-9SP); and for complying with the Federal laws and regulations pertaining to insider loans and the Federal and, if applicable, State laws and regulations pertaining to dividend restrictions. The Corporation's internal control over financial reporting was designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.
To comply with the requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the Corporation designed and implemented a structured and comprehensive assessment process to evaluate its internal control over financial reporting across the enterprise. The assessment of the effectiveness of the Corporation's internal control over financial reporting was based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Management's assessment of the Corporation's internal control over financial reporting was also conducted to meet the reporting requirements of Section 112 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act (FDICIA), which include controls over the preparation of the schedules equivalent to the basic financial statements in accordance with the instructions for the Parent Company Only Financial Statements for Small Holding Companies (Form FR Y-9SP).
Because of its inherent limitations, including the possibility of human error and the circumvention of overriding controls, a system of internal control over financial reporting can provide only reasonable assurance and may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Based on its assessment, management has concluded that, as of June 30, 2025, the Corporation's internal control over financial reporting, including controls over the preparation of regulatory financial statements in accordance with the instructions for the Parent Company Only Financial Statements for Small Holding Companies (Form FR Y-9SP), is effective based on the criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013).
Management of the Corporation has assessed the Corporation's compliance with the Federal laws and regulations pertaining to insider loans and the Federal and, if applicable, State laws and regulations pertaining to dividend restrictions during the fiscal year ended on June 30, 2025. Management has concluded that the Corporation complied with the Federal laws and regulations pertaining to insider loans and the Federal and, if applicable, State laws and regulations pertaining to dividend restrictions during the fiscal year ended on June 30, 2025.
Date: August 29, 2025
/s/ Donavon P. Ternes
Donavon P. Ternes
President and Chief Executive Officer
/s/ Peter C. Fan
Peter C. Fan
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

---

ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 9B. Other Information
(a) None
(b) Trading Plans. During the quarter ended June 30, 2025, no director or officer (as defined in Rule 16a-1(f) under the Exchange Act) of the Corporation adopted or terminated a “Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement” or “non-Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement,” as each term is defined in Item 408(a) of Regulation S-K.

---

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
Directors and Executive Officers
The information required by this item regarding the Corporation’s Board of Directors is incorporated herein by reference from the section captioned “Proposal I - Election of Directors” in the Corporation’s Proxy Statement, a copy of which will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission no later than 120 days after the Corporation’s fiscal year end.
The executive officers of the Corporation and the Bank are elected annually and hold office until their respective successors have been elected and qualified or until death, resignation or removal by the Board of Directors. For information regarding the Corporation’s executive officers, see Item 1, “Business - Executive Officers” in this Form 10-K, which is incorporated herein by reference, while the Corporation’s insider trading policies and procedures is incorporated herein on exhibit 19 in this Form 10-K.
Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers
The Corporation has adopted a Code of Ethics, which applies to all directors, officers, and employees of the Corporation. The Code of Ethics is available on the Corporation’s website, www.myprovident.com. If the Corporation makes any substantial amendments to the Code of Ethics or grants any waiver, including any implicit waiver, from a provision of the Code of Ethics to the Corporation’s principal executive officer, principal financial and accounting officer, controller, or person performing similar functions, the Corporation will disclose the nature of such amendment or waiver on the Corporation’s website and in a report on Form 8-K.
Audit Committee and Audit Committee Financial Expert
The Corporation has a separately-designated standing audit committee established in accordance with section 3(a)(58)(A) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. The audit committee consists of three independent directors of the Corporation: Judy A. Carpenter, Kathy M. Michalak and Matthew E. Webb. The Corporation has designated Judy A. Carpenter, Audit Committee Chair, as its audit committee financial expert. Ms. Carpenter is independent, as independence for audit committee members is defined under the listing standards of the NASDAQ Stock Market, is a Certified Public Accountant in California (inactive), has experience in public accounting, and has extensive business knowledge, financial expertise and familiarity with our local market and communities.
Nominating Procedures
There have been no material changes to the procedures by which shareholders may recommend nominees to its Board of Directors since last disclosed to shareholders.

---

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Item 11. Executive Compensation
The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference from the sections captioned “Executive Compensation” and “Directors’ Compensation” in the Proxy Statement, a copy of which will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission no later than 120 days after the Corporation’s fiscal year end.

---

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
a) Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners.
The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference from the section captioned “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management” in the Corporation’s Proxy Statement, a copy of which will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission no later than 120 days after the Corporation’s fiscal year end.
b) Security Ownership of Management.
The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference from the sections captioned “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management” in the Corporation’s Proxy Statement, a copy of which will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission no later than 120 days after the Corporation’s fiscal year end.
c) Changes in Control.
The Corporation is not aware of any arrangements, including any pledge by any person of securities of the Corporation, the operation of which may at a subsequent date result in a change in control of the Corporation.
d) Equity Compensation Plan Information.
The following table summarizes share and exercise price information regarding the Corporation's equity compensation plans as of June 30, 2025:
Number of Securities
Remaining Available for
Number of Securities
Future Issuance Under
to Be Issued Upon
Weighted Average
Equity Compensation
Exercise of
Exercise Price of
Plans (Excluding
Outstanding Options,
Outstanding Options,
Securities Reflected in
Plan Category
Warrants and Rights
Warrants and Rights
Column (a))
(a)
(b)
(c)
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders:
2010 Equity Incentive Plan:
Stock Options
15,000
$
20.19
-
2013 Equity Incentive Plan:
Stock Options
84,000
$
18.16
-
Restricted Stock
20,650
N/A
-
2022 Equity Incentive Plan:
Stock Options
130,000
$
13.25
45,000
Restricted Stock
124,000
N/A
74,000
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders
N/A
N/A
N/A
Total
373,650
$
15.51
119,000

---

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions. The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference from the section captioned “Board of Directors’ Meetings, Board Committees and Corporate Governance Matters - Corporate Governance - Certain Relationships and Related Transactions” in the Corporation’s Proxy Statement, a copy of which will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission no later than 120 days after the Corporation’s fiscal year end.
Director Independence. The information contained in the section captioned “Board of Directors’ Meetings, Board Committees and Corporate Governance Matters - Corporate Governance - Director Independence” is incorporated herein by reference in the Corporation’s Proxy Statement, a copy of which will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission no later than 120 days after the Corporation’s fiscal year end.

---

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES
Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services
The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference from the section captioned “Proposal 3 - Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in the Corporation’s Proxy Statement, a copy of which will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission no later than 120 days after the Corporation’s fiscal year end.
PART IV

---

ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules.
(a) 1. Financial Statements
See Consolidated Financial Statements beginning on page 79 of this Form 10-K.
2. Financial Statement Schedules
Schedules to the Consolidated Financial Statements have been omitted as the required information is inapplicable.
(b) Exhibits
Exhibits are available from the Corporation by written request.
3.1
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Provident Financial Holdings, Inc. as filed with the Delaware Secretary of State on November 24, 2009 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on November 9, 2010)
3.2
Amended and Restated Bylaws of Provident Financial Holdings, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 30, 2022)
4.1
Form of Certificate of Provident's Common Stock (incorporated by reference to the Corporation’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (333-2230) filed on March 11, 1996))
4.2
Description of Capital Stock of Provident Financial Holdings, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2019)
10.1
Transition Agreement with Craig G. Blunden (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13 to the Corporation’s Form 8-K dated October 31, 2023)
10.2
Post-Retirement Compensation Agreement with Craig G. Blunden (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Corporation’s Form 8-K dated December 19, 2005)
10.3
Employment Agreement with Donavon P. Ternes (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14 to the Corporation’s Form 8-K dated October 31, 2023)
10.4
Post-Retirement Compensation Agreement with Donavon P. Ternes (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Corporation’s Form 8-K dated July 7, 2009)
10.5
Form of Severance Agreement with Avedis Demirdjian, Peter C. Fan, Robert "Scott" Ritter, David S. Weiant and Gwendolyn L. Wertz (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Corporation’s Form 8-K dated May 23, 2025)
10.6
2010 Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit A to the Corporation’s proxy statement dated October 28, 2010)
10.7
Form of Incentive Stock Option Agreement for options granted under the 2010 Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 in the Corporation’s Form 8-K dated November 30, 2010)
10.8
Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement for options granted under the 2010 Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 in the Corporation’s Form 8-K dated November 30, 2010)
10.9
2013 Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit A to the Corporation’s proxy statement dated October 24, 2013)
10.10
Form of Incentive Stock Option Agreement for options granted under the 2013 Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 in the Corporation’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 (333-192727) dated December 9, 2013)
10.11
Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement for options granted under the 2013 Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 in the Corporation’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 (333-192727) dated December 9, 2013)
10.12
Form of Restricted Stock Agreement for restricted shares awarded under the 2013 Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 in the Corporation’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 (333-192727) dated December 9, 2013)
10.13
2022 Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit A to the Corporation’s proxy statement dated October 27, 2022)
10.14
Form of Incentive Stock Option Agreement for options granted under the 2022 Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 in the Corporation’s Form S-8 dated December 16, 2022)
10.15
Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement for options granted under the 2022 Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 in the Corporation’s Form S-8 dated December 16, 2022)
10.16
Form of Restricted Stock Agreement for restricted shares awarded under the 2022 Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 in the Corporation’s Form S-8 dated December 16, 2022)
2025 Annual Report to Stockholders
14.0
Code of Ethics for the Corporation’s directors, officers and employees (Registrant elects to satisfy Regulation S-K §229.406(c) by posting its Code of Ethics on its website at www.myprovident.com in the section titled About: Investor Relations.
Insider Trading Policy and Procedures
21.1
Subsidiaries of the Registrant
23.1
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
31.1
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
31.2
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.1
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.2
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
Compensation Recovery Policy
The following materials from the Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2025, formatted in Extensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL): (1) Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition; (2) Consolidated Statements of Operations; (3) Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income; (4) Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity; (5) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows; and (6) Selected Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
The cover page from this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2025, formatted in Inline XBRL and contained in Exhibit 101.