EDGAR 10-K Filing

Company CIK: 1848416
Filing Year: 2025
Filename: 1848416_10-K_2025_0001628280-25-008390.json

---

ITEM 1. BUSINESS
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
Overview
Verano Holdings Corp., a British Columbia corporation (“Verano,” the “Company,” “we,” “us,” or “our”), one of the U.S. cannabis industry’s leading companies based on historical revenue, geographical scope and brand performance, is a vertically integrated, multi-state operator embracing a mission of saying Yes to plant progress and the bold exploration of cannabis. An operator of licensed cannabis cultivation, processing, wholesale distribution and retail facilities, our goal is the ongoing development of communal wellness by providing responsible access to regulated medical and adult use cannabis products. As of February 25, 2025, through our subsidiaries and affiliates we operate businesses in 13 states, including 153 retail dispensaries and 15 cultivation and processing facilities with over 1.1 million square feet of cultivation capacity. We produce a wide variety of high quality cannabis products sold under our portfolio of consumer brands, including Encore™, Avexia™, MÜV™, Savvy™, (the) Essence™, BITS™ and Verano™. We also design, build and operate branded retail environments including Zen Leaf™ and MÜV™ dispensaries that deliver a cannabis shopping experience in both medical and adult use markets.
Notwithstanding the permissive regulatory environment of medical, and in some cases, also adult use (i.e., recreational) cannabis, at the state level, it remains illegal under U.S. federal law to cultivate, manufacture, distribute, sell or possess cannabis in the U.S. Because federal law prohibits transporting any federally restricted substance across state lines, cannabis cannot be transported across state lines. As a result of current federal law prohibitions, the U.S. cannabis industry is conducted on a state-by-state basis. To date, in the U.S. 38 states plus the District of Columbia and the U.S. territories of Puerto Rico, Guam, the Commonwealth of Northern Marina Islands, and the U.S. Virgin Islands have authorized comprehensive medical cannabis programs, 24 states plus the District of Columbia and the U.S. territories of Guam, the Commonwealth of Northern Mariana Islands, and the U.S. Virgin Islands have authorized comprehensive programs for medical and adult use (i.e. recreational) cannabis, and 7 states allow the use of low tetrahydrocannabinol (“THC”) and high cannabidiol (“CBD”) products for specified medical uses. Verano operates within states where cannabis use, medical or both medical and adult use, has been approved by state and local regulatory bodies. Strict compliance with state and local laws with respect to cannabis may neither absolve the Company of liability under U.S. federal law, nor may it provide a defense to any federal proceeding which may be brought against the Company.
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024, medical-use sales and adult use sales comprised approximately 51% and 49% of our consolidated revenues, respectively. For each of the fiscal years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, medical-use sales and adult use sales comprised approximately 55% and 45% of our consolidated revenues and approximately 60% and 40% of our consolidated revenues, respectively.
Substantially all of the Company’s business, operating results and financial condition relate to U.S. cannabis-related activities. Our strategy is to vertically integrate as a single cohesive company in multiple states through the consolidation of seed-to-sale cultivating, manufacturing, distributing, and dispensing cannabis brands and products at scale. Our cultivation, processing and distribution of cannabis consumer packaged goods are designed to leverage shelf-space in our national retail dispensary chains, as well as to develop and foster long term wholesale supply relationships with third-party retail operators. Our model includes geographic diversity by establishing a footprint to allow us to adapt to changes in both industry and market conditions.
Verano is a reporting issuer under both applicable securities legislation in all of the provinces and territories of Canada and applicable federal securities legislation in the U.S. The Company’s Class A subordinate voting shares (the “Subordinate Voting Shares”) are listed on Cboe Canada (“Cboe”) under the stock symbol, “VRNO,” and are also quoted for trading in the U.S. on the OTCQX under the stock symbol “VRNOF”.
The corporate headquarters of Verano is located at 224 W Hill Street, Suite 400, Chicago, Illinois 60610. Verano’s Canadian registered office is located at 20th Floor, 250 Howe Street, Vancouver, British Columbia V6C 3R8. Verano’s telephone number is (312) 265-0730. Verano’s internet address is www.verano.com. The information provided on the Company’s website is not part of this Form 10-K, unless otherwise noted.
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) maintains an internet site that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC at http://www.sec.gov. The Company also files reports, circulars, annual information statements, and other information regarding the Company with the securities regulatory authorities of Canada via the System for Electronic Document Analysis and Retrieval at www.sedarplus.ca.
History of the Company
Verano LLC
Verano Holdings, LLC, a subsidiary of the Company (“Verano LLC”), was the start of Verano’s business operations. Verano LLC is a Delaware limited liability company that was co-founded by George Archos, our current Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, in September 2017. Verano LLC was formed as a Chicago, Illinois based holding company to consolidate cannabis operations initially in Illinois, including cultivation and production facilities and retail dispensaries.
Beginning in August 2018, Verano LLC began to acquire control, management, ownership, and other rights to medical and adult use cannabis licenses in U.S. states where Verano LLC or Verano LLC’s co-founders held an existing ownership or management stake.
Starting in January 2019, Verano LLC implemented an expansion strategy whereby Verano LLC, either directly or through subsidiaries or affiliates, began acquiring control, management, ownership, and other rights to medical and adult use cannabis businesses across multiple U.S. states, including cultivation, production, wholesale distribution and retail dispensaries.
Go Public Transactions
On December 14, 2020, Verano LLC, Majesta Minerals, Inc., an Alberta corporation, 1276268 B.C. Ltd., a British Columbia corporation, 1277233 B.C. Ltd, a British Columbia corporation, and 1278655 B.C. Ltd., a British Columbia corporation, entered into an arrangement agreement, pursuant to which the Company would result from a reverse takeover transaction as a British Columbia public reporting company (the “RTO”).
On November 6, 2020, Verano LLC entered into an agreement and plan of merger with Alternative Medical Enterprises LLC (“AltMed”), Plants of Ruskin GPS, LLC and RVC 360, LLC (together, with Plants of Ruskin GPS, LLC, “Plants of Ruskin” and, collectively with AltMed, the “AME Parties”), pursuant to which the Company, as the assignee of all of Verano LLC’s rights and obligations thereunder, acquired the AME Parties and their subsidiaries and ownership and control interests (collectively with the AME Parties, the “AME Group”) via a series of merger transactions. The merger transactions were contingent upon, and were to be consummated contemporaneously with, the RTO. The RTO and the merger transactions with the AME Parties (collectively, the “Go Public Transactions”), each closed on February 11, 2021, resulting in the creation of the Company as a Canadian publicly-traded company and the parent holding company of Verano LLC, the AME Parties and their respective subsidiaries and ownership and control interests.
The RTO authorized the Company’s dual class structure of an unlimited number of Class B proportionate voting shares (the “Proportionate Voting Shares”), each of which is convertible into 100 Subordinate Voting Shares, and an unlimited number of Subordinate Voting Shares, each of which is convertible into 1/100 Proportionate Voting Share. The rights, preferences and protections of the Subordinate Voting Shares and the Proportionate Voting Shares are the same based upon the deemed conversion ratio of 100 Subordinate Voting Shares for one Proportionate Voting Share, such that each Subordinate Voting Share is entitled to one vote and each Proportionate Voting Share is entitled to 100 votes and each Proportionate Voting Share would receive 100 times the amount of any dividends or distributions that are payable for one Subordinate Voting Share.
After the consummation of the RTO the Subordinate Voting Shares were listed on the Canadian Securities Exchange (“CSE”) and began trading on February 17, 2021 under the stock symbol “VRNO”. On October 18, 2023, the Subordinate Voting Shares began trading on Cboe under the stock symbol, “VRNO.” In connection therewith, the Subordinate Voting Shares ceased trading on the CSE as of the close of market on October 17, 2023.
Credit Agreement
On October 27, 2022, Verano and certain of its subsidiaries and affiliates from time-to-time party thereto (collectively, the “Borrowers”), entered into a Credit Agreement (the “2022 Credit Agreement”) with Chicago Atlantic Admin, LLC (“Chicago Atlantic”), as administrative agent for the lenders, and the lenders from time-to-time party thereto (the “Lenders”), pursuant to which the Lenders advanced the Borrowers a $350,000,000 senior secured term loan, all of which was used to repay the principal indebtedness outstanding under the Company's previous senior secured term loan credit facility. In connection with such repayment, such previous credit facility was terminated and is no longer in force or effect.
The 2022 Credit Agreement provides the Borrowers with the right, subject to conditions, to request an additional incremental term loan in the aggregate principal amount of up to $100,000,000; provided that the Lenders elect to fund such incremental term loan. Beginning in October 2023, the 2022 Credit Agreement requires Verano to make scheduled amortization payments of $350,000 per month and the remaining principal balance is due in full on October 30, 2026.
The 2022 Credit Agreement also provides the Borrowers with the right to (a) incur up to $120,000,000 of additional indebtedness from third-party lenders secured by real estate excluded as collateral under the 2022 Credit Agreement, (b) incur additional mortgage financing from third-party lenders secured by real estate acquired after the closing date, and (c) upon the SAFE Banking Act or similar legislation making banking services available to U.S. cannabis companies being passed by the United States Congress, incur up to $50,000,000 pursuant to a revolving credit facility from third-party lenders that is pari passu or subordinated to the 2022 Credit Agreement obligations, each of which are subject to customary conditions.
The obligations under the 2022 Credit Agreement are secured by substantially all of the assets of the Borrowers, excluding vehicles, specified parcels of real estate and other customary exclusions.
The 2022 Credit Agreement provides for a floating annual interest rate equal to the prime rate then in effect plus 6.50%, which rate may be increased by 3.00% upon an event of default that is not a material event of default or 6.00% upon a material event of default.
At any time, the Company may voluntarily prepay up to $100,000,000 of the principal balance, subject to a one-time $1,000,000 prepayment premium upon the first prepayment, and may prepay the remaining outstanding principal balance for a prepayment premium at varying rates based on the timing of any subsequent prepayments. The Borrowers may not voluntarily prepay more than $100,000,000 of the principal balance without prepaying the entire outstanding principal balance of the loan. On April 30, 2024, Verano made a Permitted Partial Optional Prepayment (as defined in the 2022 Credit Agreement) in the amount of $50,000,000 pursuant to the 2022 Credit Agreement and paid a $1,000,000 prepayment premium in connection therewith. The Company may voluntarily prepay up to another $50,000,000 following the Permitted Partial Optional Prepayment in April 2024 without any additional prepayment premium. For more information, see “- Certain 2024 Developments - Permitted Partial Optional Prepayment and Lien Release.”
The 2022 Credit Agreement includes customary representations and warranties and customary events of default, including, without limitation, payment defaults, breaches of representations and warranties, covenant defaults, cross-defaults to material indebtedness, and events of bankruptcy and insolvency.
The 2022 Credit Agreement also includes customary negative covenants limiting the Borrowers’ ability to incur additional indebtedness and grant liens that are not otherwise permitted, and the ability to enter into or consummate acquisitions or dispositions that are not otherwise permitted, among others. Additionally, the 2022 Credit Agreement requires the Borrowers to meet certain financial tests regarding minimum cash balances, minimum levels of Adjusted EBITDA (as defined in the 2022 Credit Agreement) and a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio.
As of December 31, 2024, the Company was in compliance with such covenants.
George Archos, the Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Founder of the Company, participated in the 2022 Credit Agreement as a Lender funding $1,000,000 of the $350,000,000 principal amount. Mr. Archos is excluded from certain approval rights of the lenders and any penalties and fees due to Mr. Archos under the 2022 Credit Agreement are immaterial to the Company.
Certain 2024 Developments
Business Combinations
203 Organix L.L.C. & Salubrious Wellness Clinic, Inc.
On July 29, 2024, the Company entered into two equity purchase agreements:, (a) one with The Cannabist Company Holdings Inc. (“Cannabist”), CC VA Holdco LLC, Columbia Care - Arizona, Tempe, L.L.C., Thomas Allison and Salubrious Wellness Clinic, Inc. (“SWC”), pursuant to which the Company acquired all of the issued and outstanding equity interests of SWC, and (b) one with Cannabist, CC VA Holdco LLC, Columbia Care-Arizona, Prescott, L.L.C. and 203 Organix, LLC (“203” and together with SWC, “Cannabist AZ”), pursuant to which the Company acquired all of the issued and outstanding equity interests of 203. The Company added an active cultivation and production facility and increased the Company's retail footprint in Arizona. The transactions closed on August 16, 2024. Pursuant to such equity purchase agreements, the Company paid total cash consideration of $11,529,000, inclusive of estimated ongoing post-closing purchase price adjustments.
Columbia Care Eastern Virginia LLC
In addition to the equity purchase agreements entered into with Cannabist AZ, on July 29, 2024, the Company entered into an equity purchase agreement with Cannabist, Columbia Care Eastern Virginia LLC (“CC East Virginia”), and the members of CC East Virginia party thereto (the “Virginia EPA”), pursuant to which the Company acquired all of the issued and outstanding equity interests of CC East Virginia. CC East Virginia is the sole vertical cannabis operator in HSA 5 in Eastern Virginia. The transaction closed on August 21, 2024 (the “VA Closing Date”). Pursuant to the Virginia EPA, the Company paid $24,122,000 in cash consideration and equity consideration of 10,416,041 Subordinate Voting Shares with an estimated fair value of $34,453,000, all of which was distributed to the equity holders of CC East Virginia on the VA Closing Date. In addition, on the VA Closing Date, the Company issued a $27,425,000 promissory note (the “CC East Virginia Promissory Note”), inclusive of estimated ongoing post-closing purchase price adjustments, with an estimated fair value of $25,776,000 and which bears interest at a rate of 7% per annum and matures on the two-year anniversary of the VA Closing Date.
Permitted Partial Optional Prepayment and Lien Release
On April 30, 2024, the Company made a Permitted Partial Optional Prepayment (as defined in the 2022 Credit Agreement) in the amount of $50,000,000 pursuant to the 2022 Credit Agreement and paid a $1,000,000 prepayment premium in connection therewith.
In connection with such Permitted Partial Optional Prepayment, Chicago Atlantic and certain Lenders agreed to (a) release certain Borrowers from their obligations under, and as parties to, the 2022 Credit Agreement and related agreements (the “Released Borrowers”) and (b) release all liens over the Released Borrowers’ property, including real estate, held by Chicago Atlantic for the benefit of the Lenders, in each case, pursuant to a limited consent and waiver, dated as of April 29, 2024, by and among the Borrowers, certain of the Lenders party thereto and Chicago Atlantic.
Organizational Structure
Verano is a holding company and conducts its business operations through direct and indirect subsidiaries and affiliates. The following chart sets forth the corporate structure of the Company and its primary subsidiary, Verano LLC. As part of the implementation of the Go Public Transactions and tax considerations, through a series of transactions, the Company formed two levels of subsidiaries above Verano LLC that include Verano Holdings USA Corp., a Delaware corporation (“BlockerCo”), and five subsidiaries of BlockerCo, those being ZNN Holdings, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, Nuuvn Holdings, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, ZenNorth LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, A&T SPV II LLC, a Texas limited liability company, and SGI 1 LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (collectively, the “Blocker Subsidiaries”). Each of the Blocker Subsidiaries were dissolved in February 2025 and as a result, Verano LLC became a direct wholly-owned subsidiary of BlockerCo. BlockerCo has, and prior to the dissolutions, the Blocker Subsidiaries had no business or operations and exist, or existed, as applicable, solely to effect the Go Public Transactions and the taxation of Verano as a U.S. corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes. The below structure chart shows the structure of the Company as of February 25, 2025.
From time to time, we may reorganize our operating subsidiaries through consolidations, mergers, contributions, distributions and similar corporate restructurings in order to integrate acquired companies, enhance efficiencies, streamline operations, group borrowers under the 2022 Credit Agreement and align financial reporting. After giving effect to any corporate reorganization, all operating entities remain as indirect subsidiaries of the Company. See Exhibit 21.1 to this Form 10-K for a list of subsidiaries of the Company as of December 31, 2024.
Because of this holding company structure, Verano has no business operations and to the extent it cannot raise funds through the issuance of debt or equity securities, it is dependent on the financial health and operating performance of its subsidiaries and affiliates to meet its financial obligations. The ability of Verano’s subsidiaries and affiliates to pay dividends and other distributions to it or any of its other subsidiaries will depend on their operating results and will be subject to applicable laws and regulations which require that solvency and capital standards be maintained, as well as contractual restrictions on dividends and distributions that may be contained in mortgages, credit facilities and other similar agreements. In the event of a liquidation or reorganization of any of Verano’s subsidiaries, lenders and trade creditors may be entitled to payment of their claims from the assets of such subsidiary before Verano.
Our Strategy
As an operator of licensed cannabis cultivation, processing, wholesale distribution and retail facilities, Verano’s goal is the ongoing development of communal wellness by providing responsible access to medical and adult use regulated cannabis products.
Our strategy is to vertically integrate as a single cohesive company in multiple states through consolidation of seed-to-sale cultivating, processing, wholesale distributing, and dispensing branded products at scale. Our cultivation, processing and wholesale distribution of cannabis consumer packaged goods are designed to support our national retail dispensary chains and to develop and foster long term wholesale supply relationships with third-party retail dispensary operators. Our retail dispensary chains operate under brand names including Zen Leaf™ and MÜV™, and we developed this model in part to leverage shelf-space in our retail dispensaries. As of February 25, 2025, we also have several dispensaries operating under the Cannabist or SWC brand name following our acquisitions of Cannabist AZ and CC East Virginia.
Our strategy includes geographic diversity by establishing a footprint to enable us to adapt to changes in both industry and market conditions. We have pursued this strategy of geographic diversity through acquisitions and organic growth funded by internally generated cashflow, the issuance of Subordinate Voting Shares and Proportionate Voting Shares, deferred purchase price payments and the incurrence of indebtedness.
We believe that the following business objectives have positioned Verano for continued growth.
•The Company’s business plan centers around four foundational pillars: cultivation, production, brand development and retail.
•Diversity in revenue streams helps position the Company to respond proactively to changes in economics, regulations and healthcare, as well as to navigate ever-evolving consumer habits.
•The Company strives to operate and manage the entire vertical cannabis operation and supply chain from seed-to- sale.
•The Company focuses on a current potential market size of approximately 89 million adult Americans based on BDSA.com, which includes the total adult population in the 13 states in which we currently have active operations, those states being Arizona, Connecticut, Florida, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Nevada, New Jersey, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Virginia and West Virginia.
•The Company aims for a “first-mover” competitive advantage in emerging markets by seeking early entry into states with approved medical cannabis programs and then establishing a footprint and vertical operations in anticipation of the authorization of adult use cannabis.
•The Company emphasizes developing high-quality products at various price points to elevate its products’ market desirability and value.
•The Company aims to adhere to standard operating procedures across all of its cultivation and processing facilities, growing with state-permitted products and implementing compliance programs to meet product testing, inventory controls and other state regulatory requirements.
•The Company espouses a customer and patient driven business philosophy aiming to deliver value to its downstream patients and consumers.
Regulatory Framework in the United States
The U.S. regulatory scheme varies in its terminology and definitions, using “cannabis”, “marijuana” and “hemp” as distinct terms. For purposes of this Form 10-K, the term “cannabis” means “marijuana” as set forth in the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. § 811) (the “Controlled Substances Act” or the “CSA”) and is used interchangeably with the term “marijuana.”
To date, in the U.S. 38 states plus the District of Columbia and the U.S. territories of Puerto Rico, Guam, the Commonwealth of Northern Marina Islands, and the U.S. Virgin Islands have authorized comprehensive medical cannabis programs, 24 states plus the District of Columbia and the U.S. territories of Guam, the Commonwealth of Northern Mariana Islands, and the U.S. Virgin Islands have authorized comprehensive programs for medical and adult use (i.e. recreational) cannabis, and 7 states allow the use of low THC and high CBD products for specified medical uses. Notwithstanding the permissive regulatory environment of medical, and in some cases, adult use cannabis, at the state level, it remains illegal under U.S. federal law to cultivate, manufacture, distribute, sell or possess cannabis in the United States. Because U.S. federal law prohibits transporting any federally restricted substance across state lines, cannabis cannot be transported across state lines. As a result of federal law prohibitions, the U.S. cannabis industry is conducted on a state-by-state basis and we rely on established and developing laws and regulations in the states and local jurisdictions in which we operate. In addition, financial transactions involving proceeds generated by, or intended to promote, cannabis-related business activities in the U.S. may form the basis for prosecution under applicable U.S. federal money laundering legislation.
Regulation of Cannabis at the U.S. Federal Level
The U.S. federal government’s approach to enforcement of cannabis laws has trended toward deference to state laws where a robust state regulatory framework exists. In August 2013, the U.S. Department of Justice (the “DOJ”) issued a memorandum known as the “Cole Memorandum” to all U.S. Attorneys’ offices. The Cole Memorandum generally directed U.S. Attorneys not to prioritize the enforcement of federal cannabis laws against individuals and businesses that comply with state cannabis programs. The Cole Memorandum, while not legally binding and only a policy statement, assisted in managing the tension between state and federal laws concerning all medical and adult use state-regulated cannabis businesses.
In January 2018, the Cole Memorandum was rescinded by former Attorney General Jeff Sessions. While this did not create a change in federal law, the revocation added to the uncertainty of U.S. federal enforcement of the Controlled Substances Act in states where cannabis use is regulated. Former Attorney General Jeff Sessions also issued a one-page memorandum known as the “Sessions Memorandum” which confirmed the rescission of the Cole Memorandum and explained that the Cole Memorandum was “unnecessary” due to existing general enforcement guidance as set forth in the U.S. Attorney’s Manual. While the Sessions Memorandum does emphasize that marijuana is a Schedule I controlled substance, it does not otherwise indicate that the prosecution of marijuana-related offenses is a heightened DOJ priority. The Sessions Memorandum explicitly describes itself as a guide to prosecutorial discretion, which remains in the hands of U.S. Attorneys when deciding whether to prosecute marijuana-related offenses. No direction was given to federal prosecutors in the Sessions Memorandum as to the priority they should ascribe to such cannabis activities, and the Sessions Memorandum did not address the treatment of medical cannabis by federal prosecutors.
Former President Joe Biden, who assumed office in January 2021, stated a policy goal of federal cannabis decriminalization. In March 2021, Merrick Garland was appointed U.S. Attorney General by President Biden. Mr. Garland indicated he would generally act in accordance with the Cole Memorandum, when, at his confirmation hearing, he said, “It does not seem to me, a useful use of limited resources that we have, to be pursuing prosecutions in states that have legalized and that are regulating the use of marijuana, either medically or otherwise.”
In December 2022, President Biden signed The Medical Marijuana and Cannabidiol Research Expansion Act. This Act, the first standalone cannabis bill to be passed by Congress, reduces federal barriers to cannabis research, creates a mechanism for the Food and Drug Administration (the “FDA”) to approve products derived from cannabis, protects state-licensed physicians who certify patients for medical cannabis use, requires the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services to report on the potential therapeutic benefits of cannabis, and requires the Attorney General to annually review whether a sufficient amount of cannabis is being produced to meet the needs of medical cannabis research.
On August 29, 2023, the Department of Health and Human Services (“HHS”) recommended that cannabis should be placed in Schedule III of the Controlled Substances Act. This recommendation is based off the FDA analysis which recommends control in Schedule III as well as the National Institute on Drug Abuse’s review and concurrence. HHS conducted a review of the FDA’s consideration of the following eight factors: (1) actual or relative potential for abuse; (2) scientific evidence of its pharmacological effect, if known; (3) the state of current scientific knowledge regarding the drug or other substance; (4) historical and current patterns of abuse; (5) the scope, duration, and significance of abuse; (6) risks to public health; (7) its psychic or physiological dependence liability; and (8) whether the substance is an immediate precursor of a substance already controlled. After such review, HHS found that (i) cannabis’s potential for abuse is less than the drugs or other substances in schedules I and III, (ii) cannabis has a currently accepted medical use in treatment in the United States, and (iii) cannabis poses a moderate to low risk of physical dependence or high psychological dependence.
On May 21, 2024, the U.S. Justice Department announced that Attorney General Merrick Garland submitted to the Federal Register a notice of proposed rule making initiating a formal rule making process to consider moving cannabis from a Schedule I to Schedule III drug under the CSA. On December 2, 2024, the DEA held a preliminary formal hearing regarding the rescheduling of cannabis, and additional hearings were scheduled from January 21, 2025 to March 6, 2025. On January 13, 2025, the Chief Administrative Law Judge presiding over the rescheduling of cannabis ordered that the hearing scheduled for January 21, 2025, be cancelled, and that the proceedings in the matter were stayed, pending a resolution of an interlocutory appeal to the DEA administrator. A joint status update must be provided to the tribunal ninety (90) days from the issuance of the order, and every ninety (90) days thereafter.
In November 2024, Donald Trump was elected President of the United States, and later that month announced that Pam Bondi would be his nominee for Attorney General. On the campaign trail, Donald Trump expressed his support for moving cannabis to a Schedule III substance and expressed his commitment to work with Congress to pass common sense cannabis laws, including safe banking laws, for state authorized companies. Despite such statements and the ongoing rule making process, there can be no guarantees that the rescheduling rule making process will continue on a certain timeline or at all under the new administration or that any rules will come out of the rule making process that will benefit the Company.
The Company is also subject to a variety of federal laws and regulations in the U.S. and Canada that relate to money laundering, financial recordkeeping and proceeds of crime, including the Currency and Foreign Transactions Reporting Act of 1970 (commonly known as the “Bank Secrecy Act”), as amended by Title III of the Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001 (USA PATRIOT Act), the Proceeds of Crime (Money Laundering) and Terrorist Financing Act (Canada), the Criminal Code (Canada), in each case as amended and any related or similar rules, regulations or guidelines of governmental authorities in the U.S. and Canada. Further, under U.S. federal law, banks or other financial institutions that provide a cannabis business with a checking account, debit or credit card, small business loan, or any other service could be found guilty of money laundering, aiding and abetting, or conspiracy.
Additionally, under U.S. federal law it may be a violation of federal money laundering statutes for financial institutions to take any proceeds from the sale of cannabis or any other Schedule I controlled substance. Banks and other financial institutions, particularly those that are federally chartered in the U.S., could be prosecuted and possibly convicted of money laundering for providing services to cannabis businesses. The Company may also be considered in violation of federal money laundering statutes for “federal health care law violations,” which include violations of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act of 1938 (“FDCA”).
In February 2014, the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network of the Treasury Department issued a memorandum (the “FinCEN Memorandum”) providing instructions to banks seeking to provide services to cannabis-related businesses. The FinCEN Memorandum clarifies how financial institutions can provide services to cannabis-related businesses consistent with their Bank Secrecy Act obligations. It refers to supplementary guidance that Deputy Attorney General Cole issued to federal prosecutors relating to the prosecution of money laundering offenses predicated on cannabis-related violations of the Controlled Substances Act and independently lists the federal government’s enforcement priorities as related to cannabis. Although the original FinCEN Memorandum is still in place, this supplementary DOJ guidance that accompanied the FinCEN Memorandum was rescinded when former Attorney General Sessions rescinded the Cole Memorandum. Despite the attempt to legitimize cannabis banking, in practice the FinCEN Memorandum guidance has not made banks much more willing to provide services to cannabis businesses. The current law does not guarantee banks immunity from prosecution, and it also requires banks and other financial institutions to undertake time-consuming and costly due diligence on each cannabis business they take as a customer.
Due to financial institutions concerns of being implicated in or prosecuted for money laundering, cannabis businesses are often forced into becoming “cash-only” businesses. As banks and other financial institutions in the U.S. are generally unwilling to risk a potential violation of federal law without guaranteed immunity from prosecution, most refuse to provide any kind of services to cannabis businesses. The few credit unions and community banks who have agreed to work with cannabis businesses are limiting those accounts in relation to their total deposits. Since the federal government could change the banking laws as it relates to cannabis businesses at any time and without notice, these credit unions must keep sufficient cash on hand to be able to return the full value of all deposits from cannabis businesses in a single day, while also servicing the need of other customers.
In the absence of comprehensive reform of federal cannabis legislation that would decriminalize the cannabis industry, a growing number of members of the U.S. Congress (“Congress”) have expressed support for federal legislation that would eliminate the financing activity of businesses operating under state-sanctioned cannabis programs from the scope of federal money laundering statutes. In September 2019, the U.S. House of Representatives (the “House”) first passed the Secured and Fair Enforcement Banking Act of 2019 (commonly known as the “SAFE Banking Act”), which aims to provide safe harbors and guidance to financial institutions that work with legal U.S. cannabis businesses, as a standalone bill but it failed to be taken up by the U.S. Senate (“Senate”). The language of the SAFE Banking Act has been attached to various proposed legislation, but the language has not been included in any final legislation. To date, the SAFE Banking Act has passed the House a total of six times either as a standalone bill or attached to other legislation, most recently in February 2022 as an amendment to the America Competes Act (the “COMPETES Act”). However, the amendment was removed from the Senate version of the bill and was not included in the final version of the COMPETES Act amendment.
In June 2022, a variation on the SAFE Banking Act’s federal banking and financing protections was introduced. The bipartisan Capital Lending and Investment for Marijuana Businesses Act (the “CLIMB Act”) would amend any applicable federal law to allow cannabis operators access to traditional financial institutions (e.g., national U.S. securities exchanges and commercial banks). The CLIMB Act further proposes the express federal protection of third-party providers that work with legitimate cannabis and cannabis-related businesses. Such third-party business assistance includes, but is not limited to, sale of insurance or surety products; sale, leasing, or renting of real estate; provision of legal, accounting, marketing, information technology and accounting services; and the provision of equipment, parts, substances or testing services to cannabis business operators. Cannabis companies must currently pay a premium for many of these standard business services as a result of the cannabis plant’s present status under federal law, which can result in increased operating expenses.
In September 2023, the Senate Banking Committee passed the Secure and Fair Enforcement Regulation Banking Act (the “SAFER Banking Act”) out of committee by a bipartisan vote of 14-9. While the bill, SB. 2860, was placed on the Senate legislative calendar the following day, the 118th Congress concluded without passage of the bill. Other legislation that has previously been introduced in past Congresses that would make cannabis transactions easier and more predictable include the Marijuana Opportunity Reinvestment and Expungement Act (the “MORE Act”), the Cannabis Administration and Opportunities Act (the “CAO Act”), the Preparing Regulators Effectively for a Post-Prohibition Adult-Use Regulated Environment Act (the “PREPARE Act”), the Strengthening the Tenth Amendment Through Entrusting States Act (the “STATES 2.0” Act) and the States Reform Act (the “SRA”) . Despite the rescission of the Cole Memorandum, one legislative safeguard for the medical cannabis industry remains in place. Since 2015 Congress has used a rider known as the Rohrabacher-Blumenauer Amendment (also known as the Rohrabacher-Farr amendment) (the “RBA”) to prevent the federal government from using congressionally appropriated funds to enforce federal cannabis laws against regulated medical cannabis actors operating in compliance with state and local law. However, this measure does not protect adult-use cannabis businesses. Congress has repeatedly renewed the RBA and it remains in effect today.
The Agricultural Improvement Act of 2018 (the “2018 Farm Bill”) removed hemp from the Controlled Substances Act and legalized the growth and sale of hemp and hemp products. At the time the 2018 Farm Bill was passed, there was general consensus among the scientific community that THC, CBD, and hundreds of other cannabinoids were present in such a limited capacity that their potential for psychoactive response in users was not studied or considered. Under the protections of the 2018 Farm Bill, some manufacturers began synthesizing the abundant non-psychoactive CBD into intoxicating delta-8 THC, a molecule that only differs from its delta-9 relative by a location of a double bond between carbons. This expanded to include previously unstudied cannabinoids, such as delta-O THC, delta-10 THC, and THC-P (believed to be almost thirty-three percent more potent than delta-9 THC found in ‘traditional’ cannabis products), all of which is known as “Hemp-Synthesized Intoxicants”, or HSIs.
In January of 2023, the FDA, via an internal working group, concluded that the existing regulatory framework for food and supplements is not appropriate for hemp products and CBD. The Subcommittee on Health Care and Financial Services released a request for information to subject matter experts and stakeholders regarding the FDA’s regulation of hemp products and CBD. Responses to the request for information indicated FDA inaction has left both the cannabis and hemp industries in limbo. There can be no assurance that the SAFE Banking Act, the SAFER Banking Act, the CLIMB Act, the CAO Act, the MORE Act, the PREPARE Act, the STATES 2.0 Act, the States Reform Act or similar comprehensive legislation that would de-schedule and de-criminalize cannabis will be passed in the near future or at all, and there can be no assurance that the RBA will be renewed in the future. If any such legislation is passed, there is no guarantee that it will include provisions that preserve the current state-based cannabis programs under which the Company’s subsidiaries and affiliates operate or that such legislation will otherwise be favorable to the Company and its business.
An additional federal law challenge to cannabis businesses is that the provisions of Section 280E of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 as amended (the “Code”), are being applied by the Internal Revenue Service (the “IRS”) to businesses operating in the medical and adult use cannabis industry. Section 280E of the Code prohibits cannabis businesses from deducting their ordinary and necessary business expenses, forcing them to pay higher effective U.S. federal tax rates than similar companies in other industries. The effective tax rate on a cannabis business depends on how large its ratio of non-deductible expenses is to its total revenues. Therefore, businesses participating in the state legalized cannabis industry may be less profitable than they would otherwise be if Section 280E were not applied to their businesses. If cannabis were rescheduled to Schedule III under the CSA, as recommended by HHS, Section 280E prohibitions would no longer apply to businesses such as the Company operating in the state-legalized medical and adult use cannabis industry. At this time, the Company cannot predict the effect any potential rescheduling would have on its taxes, and there is no assurance that cannabis will become a Schedule III substance under the CSA on a given timeframe, or at all.
Violations of any U.S. federal laws and regulations could result in significant fines, penalties, administrative sanctions, convictions or settlements arising from civil proceedings conducted by either the federal government or private citizens, or criminal charges, including, but not limited to, disgorgement of profits, cessation of business activities, civil forfeiture or divestiture. This could have a material adverse effect on the Company, including our reputation and ability to conduct business, our cannabis licenses, the listing and trading of our securities on stock exchanges and platforms, our financial position, operating results, profitability, liquidity and the market price of our publicly traded Subordinate Voting Shares. In addition, it is difficult for the Company to estimate the time or resources that would be needed for the investigation of any such matters or its final resolution because, in part, the time and resources that may be needed are dependent on the nature and extent of any information requested by the applicable authorities involved, and such time and resources could be substantial.
Regulation of Cannabis at the U.S. State and Local Levels
Because U.S. federal law prohibits transporting any federally restricted substance across state lines, cannabis cannot be transported across state lines. This prohibition applies to, among other things, transporting cannabis between states that have legalized cannabis use and transporting cannabis that has been legally acquired in a state. Because of current federal law, the U.S. cannabis industry is regulated on a state-by-state basis, and we rely on established and developing laws and regulations in the states and local jurisdictions in which we operate. The cannabis industry is subject to state and local laws, regulations and guidelines relating to, among other matters, the cultivation, processing, distribution, sale, storage and disposal of medical and adult use cannabis, with each state enacting laws and regulations for that particular state upon approval of medical or adult use cannabis in such state. States and localities currently require licenses and permits to engage in the cannabis industry with the laws and regulations varying from state to state and locally. In many states, there are specific license caps that create high barriers to entry. In addition to stringent application requirements, licenses may be limited in scope of business. States also may enact social equity programs to foster an inclusive and equitable cannabis industry by increasing diversity in the number of license holders, which may further limit available licenses. Generally, any change in ownership of a license holder or other deemed sale, assignment or transfer of a license requires prior approval by the applicable state regulators, which approval process may be lengthy and rigorous.
For each of our licenses, the states impose strict license renewal requirements that vary state by state. We generally must complete the renewal application process within a prescribed period prior to the expiration date and pay an application fee. The state licensing body can deny or revoke licenses and renewals for a variety of reasons, including, among others, (i) submission of materially inaccurate, incomplete or fraudulent information, (ii) failure of the Company or any of its directors or officers to comply, or have a history of non-compliance, with any applicable law or regulation, including laws relating to minimum age of customers, safety and non-diversion of cannabis or cannabis products, taxes, child support, workers compensation and insurance coverage, or failure to otherwise remain in good standing (iii) failure to submit or implement a plan of correction for any identified violation, (iv) attempting to assign registration to another entity without state approval, (v) insufficient financial resources, (vi) committing, permitting, aiding or abetting of any illegal practices in the operation of a facility, (vii) failure to cooperate or give information to relevant law enforcement related to any matter arising out of conduct at a licensed facility and (viii) lack of responsible operations, as evidenced by negligence, disorderly or unsanitary facilities or permitting a person to use a registration card belonging to another person. Some jurisdictions also require licensees to attend a public hearing or forum in connection with their initial license application and license renewal application. Any unexpected delays or costs associated with the licensing renewal process could impede our ongoing or planned operations and could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition, results of operations or prospects.
Below is a general summary overview of the current licensing and regulatory framework in the states where we operated under cultivation, processing, transportation or retail licenses or have rights to operate under such licenses as of February 25, 2025. In addition to the states listed below, in the ordinary course of business we may also conduct pre-licensing activities in other markets. In these markets, we may have either applied for licenses, or plan on applying for licenses, but we do not currently own or manage businesses with cultivation, processing, transportation or retail licenses. See Appendix A to this Form 10-K for a list of the licenses and permits, by state, held by the Company for the cultivation, processing, wholesale distribution and retail sale of cannabis products as of February 25, 2025.
Arizona
Cannabis licenses in Arizona may be vertically integrated and, subject to state regulations, Arizona currently allows access to cannabis for both medical and adult use. Cannabis establishment licensees may operate all of the following: (i) a single retail location at which the licensee may sell cannabis and cannabis products to consumers, cultivate cannabis and manufacture cannabis products; (ii) a single off-site cultivation location at which the licensee may cultivate cannabis, process cannabis and manufacture cannabis products, but from which cannabis and cannabis products may not be transferred or sold to consumers; and (iii) a single off-site location at which the licensee may manufacture cannabis products and package and store cannabis and cannabis products, but from which cannabis and cannabis products may not be transferred or sold to consumer.
Arizona state licenses are renewed biennially. Every other year, licensees are required to submit a renewal application. While renewals are biennial, there is no ultimate expiry after which no renewals are permitted. Additionally, in respect of the renewal process, provided that the requisite renewal fees are paid, the renewal application is submitted at least thirty days prior to the expiration date, and there are no material violations noted against the applicable licenses, a licensee would expect to receive the applicable renewed license in the ordinary course of business.
See Appendix A to this Form 10-K for a list of the licenses issued to us with respect to our operations in Arizona.
Connecticut
Subject to state regulations, Connecticut allowed access to cannabis for medical use beginning in 2012. In July 2021, legislation went into effect allowing for the purchase and use of cannabis by any adult over the age of 21. Adult retail sales began in January 2023. Connecticut regulations apply to all aspects of cannabis seed-to-sale including record keeping, reporting, inventory quality, inventory tracking, storage, security and transportation.
Connecticut state licenses are renewed annually. Each year, licensees are required to submit a renewal application. While renewals are annual, there is no ultimate expiry after which no renewals are permitted. Additionally, in respect of the renewal process, provided that the requisite renewal fees are paid, the renewal application is submitted at least forty-five days prior to license expiration, and there are no material violations noted against the applicable licenses, a licensee would expect to receive the applicable renewed license in the ordinary course of business.
See Appendix A to this Form 10-K for a list of the licenses issued to us with respect to our operations in Connecticut.
Florida
Subject to state regulations, Florida currently allows access to cannabis for medical use. The Florida operation includes a call center for all state operations.
Florida state licenses are renewed biennially. Every other year, licensees are required to submit a renewal application. While renewals are biennial, there is no ultimate expiry after which no renewals are permitted. Additionally, in respect of the renewal process, provided that the requisite renewal fees are paid, the renewal application is submitted at least ninety days prior to the expiration date, and there are no material violations noted against the applicable licenses, a licensee would expect to receive the applicable renewed license in the ordinary course of business.
The Florida Marijuana Legalization Initiative (Initiative #22-05) appeared on the ballot in Florida as an initiated constitutional amendment on November 5, 2024. If adopted, Initiative #22-05 would have authorized the legalization of cannabis for adults twenty-one years old and older and allowed individuals to possess up to three ounces of cannabis, with up to five grams in the form of concentrate. Existing medical cannabis treatment centers would have been authorized under the initiative to acquire, cultivate, process, manufacture, sell, and distribute cannabis products and accessories. The amendment achieved majority, 56%, support among voters in Florida but failed to reach the supermajority 60% required for adoption. A revised constitutional amendment, drafted to address a number of concerns raised by opponents of Initiative #22-05, has been submitted to the Florida Secretary of State for consideration during the 2026 election. This ballot initiative remains subject to possible legal challenges. There is no assurance that this initiative will appear on the ballot in Florida or that Florida voters will support this initiative.
See Appendix A to this Form 10-K for a list of the licenses issued to us with respect to our operations in Florida.
Illinois
Subject to state regulations, Illinois currently allows access to cannabis for both medical and adult use. Illinois has issued a limited amount of dispensary, cultivation, and processing licenses. Applicants for cannabis business licenses must meet, among others, the following requirements: (i) the location for a dispensary must be suitable for public access; (ii) the location must not pose a detrimental impact to the surrounding community; (iii) demonstrate compliance with safety procedures for dispensary employees, patients, and caregivers, and safe delivery and storage of cannabis and currency; (iv) provide an adequate plan for recordkeeping, tracking and monitoring inventory, quality control, destruction and disposal of cannabis, and procedures to discourage unlawful activity; (v) develop a business plan specifying products to be sold; and (vi) demonstrate knowledge of, experience, and proven record of ensuring optimal safety and accuracy in the dispensing and sale of cannabis.
Once a license is granted, licensees have a continuing obligation to ensure no cannabis is sold, delivered, transported, or distributed to a location outside of Illinois. Licenses are valid for one year, and after the initial term, licensees are required to submit renewal applications. Illinois requires on-going compliance by license holders to regulations regarding the requirements of the application, which include suitable locations, safety procedures, procedures for compliance with laws, record keeping, reporting, storage, inventory quality, inventory tracking, security and transportation. In respect of the renewal process, provided that the requisite renewal fees are paid, the renewal application is timely submitted prior to the expiration date, and there are no material violations noted against the applicable licenses, a licensee would expect to receive the applicable renewed license in the ordinary course of business.
Following an approximate three-year delay in Illinois’s 2020 licensing application process, new adult use dispensary, infuser, craft grower, and transporter licenses have began to operationalize. The Company established strong relationships with Illinois customers and the communities in which it operates, and will work with new licensees to build profitable new business relationships. While the operationalization of new cannabis business licenses does increase the level of retail competition within this state market, it also presents additional wholesale opportunities for the Company’s cultivation and manufacturing operation in this state market.
See Appendix A to this Form 10-K for a list of the licenses issued to us with respect to our operations in Illinois.
Maryland
Subject to state regulations, Maryland currently allows access to cannabis for both medical and adult use. The principal license categories in Maryland are: (i) standard grower; (ii) standard processor; (iii) standard dispensary; (iv) micro grower; (v) micro processor; (vi) micro dispensary; (vii) incubator space; and (viii) on-site consumption establishment. Maryland has limited the number of each license, and allows a dispensary licensee to have a direct interest in up to four dispensaries at one time. The standard dispensary license permits the licensee to purchase cannabis from cultivation facilities, cannabis and cannabis products from product manufacturing facilities and cannabis from other retail stores and allows the sale of cannabis and cannabis products to registered patients. The standard grower license permits the licensee to acquire, possess, cultivate, deliver, transfer, have tested, transport, supply or sell cannabis and related supplies to cannabis dispensaries, and cannabis cultivation facilities. The standard processing license permits the licensee to purchase cannabis from cultivation facilities, manufacture cannabis products, and sell those products to licensed cannabis dispensaries. Maryland licenses are valid for a period of five years and are subject to renewals after required fees are paid and provided that the business remains in good standing.
Maryland requires on going compliance with laws and regulations regarding record keeping, reporting, storage, inventory quality, inventory tracking, security and transportation. The license holder must ensure that no cannabis may be sold, delivered, transported or distributed by a producer from or to a location outside of the State. Registration renewal applications may be denied if the licensee has a history of non-compliance and penalties.
See Appendix A to this Form 10-K for a list of the licenses issued to us with respect to our operations in Maryland.
Massachusetts
Subject to state regulations, Massachusetts currently allows access to cannabis for both medical and adult use. On the medical side, there is one principal state license category in Massachusetts: a vertically-integrated license. On the adult use side, there are many state license categories, but the two principal ones are cultivator and establishment (i.e., dispensary). Municipalities may individually determine what local permits or licenses are required if a licensee wishes to establish an operation within its boundaries. Medical use licensees are “vertically-integrated,” meaning they grow, process, and dispense their own cannabis. As such, each medical use licensee is required to have a retail facility as well as cultivation and processing operations. Under certain conditions, medical use licensees can acquire up to 45% of their annual inventory of product from other medical use licensees. Medical use licensees that elect to conduct cultivation, processing and retail operations in one location, are commonly referred to as a “co-located” operation.
Massachusetts mandates a comprehensive application process for licensees. Each applicant must submit charter documents, comprehensive financial statements, a character competency assessment, and employment and education histories of the senior partners and individuals responsible for the day-to-day security and operations. Each Massachusetts dispensary, grower, and processor license is valid for one year.
Licensees are heavily regulated with on-going requirements related to operations, security, storage, transportation, inventorying, personnel, and more. As in other states where cannabis is legal, Massachusetts regulators can deny or revoke licenses and renewals for multiple reasons. Additionally, license holders must ensure that no cannabis is sold, delivered, or distributed by a producer from or to a location outside of Massachusetts. Provided that the requisite renewal fees are paid, the renewal application is submitted at least ninety days prior to the expiration date, and there are no material violations noted against the applicable licenses, a licensee would expect to receive the applicable renewed license in the ordinary course of business.
See Appendix A to this Form 10-K for a list of the licenses issued to us with respect to our operations in Massachusetts.
Michigan
Subject to state regulations, Michigan currently allows access to cannabis for both medical and adult use. Michigan administers five types of licenses: (i) grower licenses; (ii) processor licenses; (iii) secure transporter licenses; (iv) provisioning center licenses; and (v) safety compliance facility licenses. There are no stated limits on the number of licenses that can be made available on a state level; however, regulatory authorities have discretion over the approval of applications and municipalities can pass additional restrictions.
Licensees are heavily regulated with on going requirements related to operations, security, storage, transportation, inventorying, personnel, and more. As in other states where cannabis is legal, Michigan regulators can deny or revoke licenses and renewals for multiple reasons. Additionally, license holders must ensure that no cannabis is sold, delivered, or distributed by a producer from or to a location outside of Michigan.
Michigan state licenses are renewed annually. Every year, licensees are required to submit a renewal application with requisite renewal fees, including maintaining and providing proof of commercial general liability insurance and coverage for bodily injury resulting from sale of cannabis products. Provided that the requisite renewal fees are paid, the renewal application is timely submitted prior to the expiration date, and there are no material violations noted against the applicable licenses, a licensee would expect to receive the applicable renewed license in the ordinary course of business.
See Appendix A to this Form 10-K for a list of the licenses issued to us with respect to our operations in Michigan.
Nevada
Subject to state regulations, Nevada currently allows access to cannabis for both medical and adult use. Nevada is not a vertically integrated system, and there are three principal license categories in Nevada: (i) cultivation; (ii) processing; and (iii) dispensary. The cultivation licenses permit the licensee to acquire, cultivate, deliver, supply and/or sell cannabis and related supplies to cannabis dispensaries and facilities for the production of edible cannabis products and cannabis -infused products. The processing license permits the licensee to acquire, manufacture, deliver, supply and/or sell edible cannabis products or cannabis-infused products to other cannabis production facilities or cannabis dispensaries. The dispensary licenses permit the licensee to purchase cannabis from cultivation facilities, cannabis and cannabis products from product manufacturing facilities, and cannabis from other retail stores, as well as allow the sale of cannabis and cannabis products to lawful consumers.
Nevada licenses are valid for one year and are subject to annual renewals after required fees are paid and provided that the business remains in good standing. Nevada requires on going compliance with laws and regulations regarding record keeping, reporting, storage, inventory quality, inventory tracking, security and transportation. Provided that the requisite renewal fees are paid, the renewal application is timely submitted prior to the expiration date, and there are no material violations noted against the applicable licenses, a licensee would expect to receive the applicable renewed license in the ordinary course of business.
See Appendix A to this Form 10-K for a list of the licenses issued to us with respect to our operations in Nevada.
New Jersey
Subject to state regulations, New Jersey currently allows access to cannabis for medical use and adult use. New Jersey permits the operation of vertically integrated cannabis licenses, named Alternate Treatment Centers (“ATCs”) which allow the licensee to cultivate, process, and sell medical cannabis products to registered qualified patients and caregivers. There are also non-vertically integrated licenses, which principally include: (i) cultivators and manufacturers, which may cultivate cannabis and manufacture medical cannabis products; and (ii) dispensaries which may sell medical cannabis and products to registered qualified patients and caregivers. For adult use cannabis, New Jersey administers six license classes, the principal of which are: (i) cultivator, which may grow recreational use cannabis; (ii) manufacturers, which may produce recreational use cannabis in additional approved forms; and (iii) retailer, which may sell recreational cannabis to consumers over the age of 21. ATCs may expand into adult use sales if approved by New Jersey’s Cannabis Regulatory Commission.
Licensees are heavily regulated with on going requirements related to operations, security, storage, transportation, inventory, personnel, and more. New Jersey licenses are valid for one year and are subject to annual renewals. As in other states where cannabis is legal, New Jersey regulators can deny or revoke licenses and renewals for multiple reasons. Additionally, license holders must ensure that no cannabis is sold, delivered, or distributed by a producer from or to a location outside of New Jersey. Provided that the requisite renewal fees are paid, the renewal application is submitted at least ninety days prior to the expiration date, and there are no material violations noted against the applicable licenses, a licensee would expect to receive the applicable renewed license in the ordinary course of business.
See Appendix A to this Form 10-K for a list of the licenses issued to us with respect to our operations in New Jersey.
Ohio
Subject to state regulations, Ohio currently allows access to cannabis for medical and adult use. There are three principal license categories in Ohio: (i) dual use cultivator; (ii) dual use processor; and (iii) dual use dispensary. On at least a biennial basis, state regulators consider whether enough medical cannabis dispensaries exist, considering the state population, the number of patients seeking to use medical cannabis and the geographic distribution of dispensary sites. More licenses may be issued based on those findings. The dual use cultivation licenses permit the licensee to acquire, possess, cultivate, manufacture, and process medical and adult use cannabis products, deliver, transfer, have tested, transport, supply and/or sell cannabis and related supplies to dispensaries. The dual use processor license permits the licensee to manufacture and produce medical and adult use cannabis products. The dual use dispensary license permits the licensee to purchase cannabis and cannabis products from cultivation and processing facilities, as well as allow the sale of cannabis and cannabis products to registered patients and lawful consumers.
Ohio requires on going compliance with laws and regulations regarding record keeping, reporting, storage, inventory, product quality, inventory tracking, security, and transportation. The license holder must ensure that no cannabis may be sold, delivered, transported, or distributed by a producer from or to a location outside of the State. Registration renewal applications may be denied if the licensee has a history of non-compliance and penalties. Ohio cultivation, processing, and dispensary licenses are valid for one year and subject to annual renewal. Provided that the requisite renewal fees are paid, the renewal application is submitted at least thirty days for cultivation and/or manufacturing (or forty-five days for dispensaries), prior to the expiration date, and there are no material violations noted against the applicable licenses, a licensee would expect to receive the applicable renewed license in the ordinary course of business.
On November 7, 2023, ballot initiative Ohio Issue 2, the Marijuana Legislative Initiative, was approved by 57% of Ohio voters as an indirect initiated state statute. In addition to authorizing adult use in Ohio, the ballot initiative authorizes adult-use consumers to possess up to 2.5 ounces of cannabis (up to fifteen grams of cannabis concentrates) and to purchase plant material, seeds, live plants, and clones. The initiative further established the Division of Cannabis Control within the Ohio Department of Commerce. Under the initiative, additional adult-use licenses may be allocated beginning two years from the issuance of initial adult-use licenses based on certain market factors.
See Appendix A to this Form 10-K for a list of the licenses issued to us with respect to our operations in Ohio.
Pennsylvania
Subject to state regulations, Pennsylvania currently allows access to cannabis for medical use. The principal permit categories in Pennsylvania are: (i) cultivation; (ii) processing; and (iii) dispensary. The cultivation and processing permits allow the holder to acquire, possess, cultivate, manufacture and/or process medical cannabis products and medical cannabis-infused products, and deliver, transfer, have tested, transport, supply or sell cannabis and related supplies to medical cannabis dispensaries. The retail dispensary permits allow the holder to purchase cannabis and cannabis products from cultivation and processing facilities, as well as allow the sale of cannabis and cannabis products to registered patients and caretakers.
Pennsylvania state licenses are renewed annually, and licensees are required to submit a renewal application every year. There is no ultimate expiry after which no renewals are permitted. In respect of the renewal process, the renewal application must be submitted within six months, but no later than four months of the license’s expiration and requires detailed information regarding the licensee’s operations.
Permit holders are heavily regulated with on-going requirements related to operations, security, storage, transportation, inventorying, personnel, and more. As in other states where cannabis is legal, Pennsylvania regulators can deny or revoke permits and renewals for multiple reasons. Additionally, permit holders must ensure that no cannabis is sold, delivered, or distributed by a producer from or to a location outside of Pennsylvania.
See Appendix A to this Form 10-K for a list of the licenses issued to us with respect to our operations in Pennsylvania.
Virginia
Subject to state regulations, Virginia currently allows access to cannabis for medical use. Virginia’s Cannabis Control Authority administers two permit types: (i) pharmaceutical processor, which grows and processes medical cannabis; and (ii) dispensaries, which dispense medical cannabis and medical cannabis products to patients and caregivers. Each year, licensees are required to submit a renewal application. While renewals are annual, there is no ultimate expiry after which no renewals are permitted. Additionally, in respect of the renewal process, provided that the requisite renewal fees are paid, the renewal application is submitted prior to the expiration date, and there are no material violations noted against the applicable licenses, a licensee would expect to receive the applicable renewed license in the ordinary course of business.
In January 2025, Senator Aaron Rouse of Virginia Beach introduce Senate Bill 970 which would authorize adult use of cannabis in Virginia. In 2024, similar legislation was vetoed by Governor Glenn Youngkin.
See Appendix A to this Form 10-K for a list of the licenses issued to us with respect to our operations in Virginia.
West Virginia
Subject to state regulations, West Virginia currently allows access to cannabis for medical use. West Virginia’s Office of Medical Cannabis administers three permit types: (i) growers, which grow and cultivate medical cannabis, (ii) processors, which manufacture medical cannabis into approved forms other than usable medical cannabis, and (iii) dispensaries, which dispense medical cannabis and medical cannabis products to patients and caregivers. Licenses must be annually renewed.
West Virginia requires on-going compliance with laws and regulations regarding record keeping, reporting, storage, inventory, product quality, inventory tracking, security and transportation. The license holder must ensure that no cannabis may be sold, delivered, transported or distributed by a permittee from or to a location outside of the State. Registration renewal applications may be denied if the licensee has a history of non-compliance and penalties.
West Virginia licenses are valid for one year and subject to annual renewal. In respect of the renewal process, the renewal application must be submitted within six months, but no later than four months of the license’s expiration and requires detailed information regarding the licensee’s operations.
See Appendix A to this Form 10-K for a list of the licenses issued to us with respect to our operations in West Virginia.
Conclusion
It is impossible to determine the extent of the impact of new federal and state and local laws, regulations or initiatives that may be proposed. The regulatory uncertainty surrounding the cannabis industry may adversely affect our business and operations, including without limitation by increasing costs to remain compliant with applicable laws, the impairment of our business by enhanced restrictions and restrictions on our ability to raise additional capital.
We will continue to monitor proposed changes to existing cannabis laws and regulations, the enactment of new cannabis laws and regulations and our compliance with applicable existing cannabis laws and regulations on an ongoing basis in accordance with our compliance program and standard operating procedures. While we believe our operations are in compliance with all applicable state and local laws, regulations and licensing requirements, such activities remain illegal under federal law. For the reasons described above and the risks further described in the section entitled “Risk Factors,” there are significant risks associated with our business. Readers of this Form 10-K are strongly encouraged to carefully read all of the risk factors contained in Item 1A - “Risk Factors.”
State and Local Licenses and Permits
The Company, through our subsidiaries and affiliates, holds all licenses and permits that are necessary to comply with state and local cannabis medical and adult use laws and regulations applicable to our operations. All such permits and licenses are current and in effect. We are dependent upon the maintenance and renewal of our cannabis licenses and permits in the states and localities in which our business is operated. Maintenance and renewal of these licenses and permits requires us to remain in compliance with state and local laws and the rules and regulations promulgated by state and local jurisdictions.
See Appendix A to this Form 10-K for a list of the licenses and permits, by state, held by the Company for the cultivation, processing, wholesale distribution and retail sale of cannabis products as of February 25, 2025.
State and local laws and associated rules and regulations may change in the future, and we may be required to obtain additional or supplemental licenses or permits at such times. Our growth strategy includes the acquisition of additional state licensed businesses or assets that may require us to obtain prior state regulatory approval to a change of ownership of the license holder or to a deemed transfer, assignment or sale of the applicable license, which regulatory approval may be conditioned on stringent requirements, in particular if such businesses or assets reside in states or local jurisdictions where we do not currently have operations. See “Item 1A. Risk Factors - Risks Related to our Business and Operations - The Cannabis Industry”.
Regulatory Compliance Program
Our compliance group oversees, maintains, and implements our regulatory compliance program. The compliance group also prepares, submits and processes our applications for new licenses, renewals, approvals for changes to our existing licenses and approvals for change of ownership of licensees or deemed sales, transfers or assignments of licenses that arise with acquisitions and dispositions. In addition to our internal regulatory group and legal group, we have engaged outside legal counsel, consultants and advisors in many jurisdictions.
The compliance group oversees training for cultivation, production and dispensary managers and employees, along with other department leaders and other persons, as needed, in maintaining compliance with all state and local laws and regulations. The compliance group also monitors all new, proposed, and/or amended laws and regulations and compliance notifications from state and local regulators and inspectors, and the compliance group leads in timely resolving any identified issues or concerns.
Our compliance program includes the following compliance objectives.
•Ensure the operations of our subsidiaries (or third parties, in jurisdictions where we have agreements that provide contractual rights with respect to ownership, management services, consulting or licensing, or a combination thereof, with respect to the applicable license and related cannabis business being conducted pursuant thereto (each such agreement, a “Management Agreement”)) are compliant with all licensing requirements by the applicable state, county, municipality, town, township, borough, and other administrative entities.
•Ensure our business activities adhere to the scope of the licensing obtained. In the states where only medical cannabis is permitted, the cannabis products are only sold to patients who hold the necessary documentation to permit the possession of the cannabis being sold, and in the states where cannabis is permitted for adult use, the cannabis products are only sold to individuals who meet the requisite age and respective state identification requirements. We carefully align with regulations in jurisdictions allowing both medical and adult use cannabis to ensure compliance with each program.
•Perform due diligence on cannabis businesses we may acquire, including on the policies and procedures in place to ensure that cannabis products are not distributed to minors and review the ownership to ensure that no profits or revenues are used for the benefit of criminal enterprises and that the business has not been involved in violations of law.
•Ensure our businesses adhere to our policies, procedures and practice standards with sufficient checks and balances to confirm that no revenue is distributed to criminal enterprises.
•Review inventory tracking systems and procedures to ensure that the compliance system is effective at tracking inventory and ensuring that there is no diversion of cannabis or cannabis products within the state, in addition to ensuring that no cannabis or cannabis products are diverted into the states where cannabis is not permitted by state law or cross state lines in general.
•Review financial records to ensure that our business activity is not used as a cover or pre-text for trafficking of illegal drugs or engaged in any other illegal activity or any activities that are contrary to any applicable anti-money laundering statutes.
•Conduct background checks to ensure that our directors, officers, and management are of good character, and have not been involved with illegal drugs, engaged in illegal activity or activities involving violence, or use of firearms in the cultivation, manufacturing or distribution of cannabis.
•Review activities of each of our subsidiary and affiliate businesses, the premises on which our subsidiaries and affiliates operate and adherence with the policies and procedures that are related to the possession of cannabis or cannabis products outside of licensed premises, including that there is no possession or use of cannabis on federal property or manufacturing or cultivation of cannabis on federal lands.
•Conduct reviews of products and product packaging to ensure that the products and packaging comply with applicable regulations and contain necessary disclaimers about the contents of the products to prevent adverse public health consequences from cannabis use and prevent violations related to motor vehicle, labor and other laws applicable to individuals.
We have comprehensive standard operating procedures that apply to seed-to-sale inventory control across all our locations that include, among others, procedures for receiving inventory, inventory tracking, testing, quality control, storage, record keeping, record retention, required reporting, and security and transportation, as well as procedures for performing inventory reconciliation and ensuring the accuracy of recordkeeping. Regular audits of cannabis and cannabis products inventories are conducted to detect any possible diversion. In addition, security and compliance staff conduct unscheduled and unannounced audits to prevent complacency or the perception thereof. Adherence to the Company’s standard operating procedures is mandatory to ensure that our operations are compliant with the rules set forth by the applicable state and local laws, regulations, ordinances, licenses and other requirements.
Products
We derive our revenues from our wholesale business and our retail dispensary chains. The retail business includes the design, development and operation of branded dispensaries in both medical and adult use markets. Our primary retail presence is traditional brick-and-mortar. However, as regulations allow, we expect to continue to expand our e-commerce, in-store guest pick-up and direct-to-consumer delivery capabilities as part of our commitment to providing a consistent retail brand experience no matter where the consumer might be.
We distribute our portfolio of products to cannabis retail stores in our active markets, including our own retail stores. Ownership of both wholesale and retail operations supports our strategy of distributing our brands at scale by enabling the Company to capture market share, generate brand awareness, and earn customer loyalty in our operating markets through our managed dispensaries and through third-party wholesale customers.
We manufacture and sell a comprehensive array of cannabis products that we design and develop with consumer segments in mind in both the medical and adult use markets. We estimate our products include a proprietary portfolio of over 1,000 product stock-keeping units (“SKUs”), and include flower, concentrates for dabbing and vaporizing, edibles, and topicals. Our consumer brands include Encore™, Avexia™, MÜV™, Savvy™, (the) Essence™, BITS™ and Verano™. Our retail dispensaries operate under brands including Zen Leaf™ and MÜV™. As of February 25, 2025, we also have several dispensaries operating under the Cannabist or SWC brand name following our acquisitions of Cannabist AZ and CC East Virginia.
We utilize seed-to-sale tracking software to inventory products, assess quality and minimize product discrepancies and deviated inventory.
Operational Foundation & Current Geographic Markets
We are engaged in the cultivation, processing and distribution of cannabis products with both wholesale and retail business operations. Processing is done on-site in kitchens and processing facilities and distribution of products only occurs at these facilities. We do not own or lease any warehouses to store cannabis.
Our current active operations are located in the following 13 states: Arizona, Connecticut, Florida, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Nevada, New Jersey, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Virginia and West Virginia. Our active operations include cultivation, processing, wholesale distribution and retail. All of these markets are subject to state regulations that vary by state, and many of these regulations have, from time to time, been enacted, modified and amended. In addition, municipalities may individually determine what local permits or licenses are required to operate within their boundaries. We actively monitor state and local developments in laws and regulations which may impact our business interests and operations. See “-Regulatory Framework in the United States- Regulation of Cannabis at the U.S. State and Local Levels” above for additional information.
NATIONAL FOOTPRINT
Our business plan includes the continued growth of our wholesale and retail operations by entering new markets and expanding in our current markets, including when medical markets expand into adult use markets. Growth plans include applying for new licenses, acquiring existing licensed businesses in limited license markets and maximizing operations under our existing licenses.
Research and Development
Our research and development activities have primarily focused on the development and improvement of efficient and sustainable cannabis cultivation and manufacturing methodologies and technologies to increase yields and maintain and improve the quality of our products. This includes research on lighting methods, air controls, racking and stacking, growing media, nutrient mixtures, pest management techniques, ambient controls, and automation.
We also engage in research and development activities focused on creating new extracted or infused products, and breeds of new cannabis strains and varietals. Our product development team includes members from all relevant product disciplines, who actively monitor existing and prospective markets, as well as test and evaluate the financial viability of all new proposed products.
Intellectual Property
We believe that intellectual property rights and brand protection are important parts of our business strategy. We regularly seek to protect our intellectual property rights in connection with our operating names, our consumer-packaged goods, and certain proprietary goods and services. Such rights include patented and non-patented technology, trade secrets, copyrightable works, and state and federal trademarks. The U.S. federal trademark statute, The Lanham Act, allows for the protection of trademarks and service marks on products and services used, or intended for use, lawfully. Because cannabis-related products and services remain illegal at the U.S. federal level under the Controlled Substances Act, we are not able to register all our trademarks at the U.S. federal level for all products and services; therefore, we currently utilize trademark protection at the state level where commercially feasible. We have also sought protection of our trademarks internationally in countries where we may use the marks or license the right to use the marks. Nonetheless, our success depends upon other areas of our business such as brand awareness, product development and design, production and marketing and not exclusively upon trademarks, patents and trade secrets.
The Company, through our subsidiaries and affiliates, has a growing portfolio of approximately 145 trademarks registered or pending registration with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office or other state entities and approximately 70 trademarks registered or pending registration with non-U.S. governmental entities, including trademarks with respect to products and retail branding. Product trademarks include various brands such as: Encore™, Avexia™, MÜV™, Savvy™, (the) Essence™, BITS™ and Verano™, and dispensary brands Zen Leaf™ and MÜV™. We anticipate feedback on outstanding submitted applications on a rolling basis and will continue to rely on common law protection for our brands during the trademark registration process. We plan to renew our trademarks on an ongoing basis, and we plan to proactively seek intellectual property protection for products, services, and brand expansions in current markets as well as any new market expansion.
From the time we became licensed to cultivate cannabis, we have developed proprietary cultivation techniques for operating ethanol, butane, and carbon dioxide extraction machinery, including what we believe are best production practices, operating procedures, and methods. This requires specialized skills in cultivation, extraction and refining. Four U.S. and fourteen foreign patents and patent applications are held by our subsidiaries and affiliates for cannabinoid formulations related to transdermal and oral delivery. For additional details, see “Item 1A. Risk Factors - Risks Related to Our Business and Operations - Information Technology, Cybersecurity and Intellectual Property.”
We have several website domains, including www.verano.com, numerous social media accounts across all major platforms, and various phone and web application platforms. We rely on contractual protection, including non-disclosure and confidentiality agreements to protect our intellectual property rights, including trade secrets. To the extent the Company describes or discloses its proprietary cultivation or extraction techniques in its applications for cultivation or processing licenses, the Company’s policy is to redact or request redactions of such information prior to public disclosure. For additional details on the risks associated with the Company’s intellectual property, see “Item 1A. Risk Factors - Risks Related to Our Business and Operations - Information Technology, Cybersecurity and Intellectual Property.”
Competitive Conditions
The fast-growing market for legalized cannabis in the U.S. has created a competitive environment for cannabis producers as well as other types of companies who provide goods and services to the cannabis industry. We compete with a variety of different operators across the states in which we currently operate. In many of these states, there are specific license caps that create high barriers to entry. Management of the Company views multi-state operators that have vertical operations as our most direct competition, including the following U.S. based public reporting companies: Green Thumb Industries Inc., Cresco Labs, Inc., Curaleaf Holdings, Inc., and Trulieve Cannabis Corp.
Aside from existing direct competition in states in which we currently operate, out-of-state operators that are capitalized well enough to enter state markets through acquisitions are also considered part of the competitive landscape. Similarly, as we pursue our national footprint growth strategy, operators in our target markets will inevitably become direct competitors. Additionally, we, along with all legally operating competitors, face competition from the illicit markets, including from psychoactive hemp-based products. See “Item 1A. Risk Factors - Risks Related to our Business and Operations - The Cannabis Industry.” However, as state and local regulators increase scrutiny on these illicit markets, management of the Company believes this competitive threat will be meaningfully reduced.
There remains a significant lack of traditional sources of bank lending and equity capital available to fund the operations of companies in the cannabis sector. Financing for companies in the cannabis sector is more difficult than other sectors, particularly in the U.S., due to cannabis’s classification as a Schedule I drug under the Controlled Substance Act and federal illegality, which create barriers to entry. Additionally, the dynamics of the changing regulatory environment at the state level further complicate financing for companies in the cannabis sector. Competitors, particularly those that sell hemp products which are currently legal in the U.S., may have better access than we do to financing sources and the capital markets.
Marketing and Sales
As of February 25, 2025, through our subsidiaries and affiliates we operate businesses in 13 states, including 153 retail dispensaries and 15 cultivation and processing facilities with over 1.1 million square feet of cultivation capacity. Our sales revenue is derived from our wholesale business and our national chain of retail dispensaries operating under our brands, including Zen Leaf™ and MÜV™.
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024, approximately 34.5% of our consolidated revenue, net of discounts, were generated by our wholesale operations and approximately 65.5% of our consolidated revenue, net of discounts were generated by our retail dispensary operations, in each case, excluding intersegment eliminations. For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024, medical-use sales and adult use sales contributed approximately 51% and 49% of our consolidated revenues, respectively.
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024, approximately 17% and 16% of our consolidated sales were generated in Illinois and New Jersey, respectively, where 69% and 90% of sales were in adult use products in each market, respectively. For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024, approximately 22% of our consolidated sales were generated by our Florida operations, where all sales are for medical products and are generated solely by our retail stores given the vertical integration requirements of Florida’s cannabis regulations. Verano is not dependent upon any single customer, or a few customers, noting that a customer is a single retail customer or an individual dispensary customer, would not have a material adverse effect on our business or financial results.
Some of the states in which we operate have regulations that restrict marketing and sales activities of cannabis products. Restrictions may specify what, where and to whom cannabis product information and descriptions may appear or be advertised. Marketing, advertising, packaging and labeling regulations for cannabis products also vary from state to state, potentially limiting the consistency and scale of consumer branding communications and product education efforts. We strive to deploy a diverse range of marketing and brand recognition strategies that comply with applicable local and state laws and regulations.
In medical cannabis markets we seek to educate patients and potential patients about our products and medical dispensaries through certifying physicians, community outreach events and on-going staff training and education. For adult use markets, we seek to educate customers and potential customers about our products and retail dispensaries through community outreach events, compliant advertising and on-going staff training and education, in each case, where allowed under applicable regulations. In Florida we operate a patient care call center with staff that provide support via direct phone, email and online chat customer service communication for customers spanning a majority of our multi-state footprint.
Market data for more established markets expanding into adult use of cannabis are generally more reliable than market data for medical cannabis in states launching their initial programs. We rely largely on our own market research to forecast sales based upon historical sales, demographics, regulatory changes, demand, competition and similar consumer driven research. Using market data for medical and adult use cannabis can be difficult due to ongoing regulatory changes, limited information given the age of the industry and unreliable market information on supply levels. See “Item 1A. Risk Factors - Our sales volumes are difficult to forecast and a failure in the expected demand for our products to materialize could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations” for more information.
Cultivation and Production
The cultivation and production of cannabis products requires licensing and permitting by each state where operations are conducted. As of February 25, 2025, we actively operate 15 cultivation and production facilities with over 1.1 million square feet of cultivation capacity. Seven of these production facilities are Current Good Manufacturing Practices certified.
We only use state-permitted products in our cultivation sites to meet testing, inventory, and other applicable state regulatory requirements. We have implemented and are adhering to standard operating procedures across all of our production facilities.
Although cannabis is an agricultural product, our cultivation methodologies employ a perpetual harvest system whereby plants are propagated and harvested on a staggered schedule. This ensures limited variability in the availability of finished products and minimizes the otherwise cyclical or seasonal nature of the plant-based business.
Components
The principal components in the production of our consumer packaged products include cannabis grown internally or acquired through wholesale channels, as well as other agricultural products, and packaging materials (including glass, plastic and cardboard) acquired through wholesale channels. Almost all raw material inputs, except packaging materials, used to produce our cannabis consumer packaged goods are cultivated or processed internally for further use in the manufacturing process. Due to the U.S. federal prohibition on cannabis, we must source cannabis within each state in which we operate.
Environmental
Similar to traditional agricultural practices, the cultivation and processing of cannabis can impact the environment through waste, energy use, air pollutants, agriculture water runoff, and soil degradation. The extent of these environmental impacts is contingent on the methods of cultivation and production employed. The cannabis industry is in its early stages, and as it continues to mature and expand with increasing legalization, we believe the industry will develop comprehensive environmental sustainability practices in accordance with emerging state regulatory requirements. The establishment of cooperative policies and standards across local, state, regional, and national levels for both cannabis and hemp markets will be pivotal to advancing environmental sustainability across the cannabis industry.
Organic plant waste and single-use consumer packaging constitute a significant portion of the waste generated from the industrial-scale cultivation and processing of cannabis. In several states, regulations mandate that cannabis waste must be rendered “unusable” and “unrecognizable” before it can be disposed in a landfill. Subsequently, in certain states, it is required to be mixed with non-cannabis waste to achieve a ratio of 50% cannabis waste and 50% non-cannabis waste before it can be disposed in a landfill. While many states provide various alternatives that can be mixed with cannabis waste, cultivation sites may struggle to provide sufficient volumes of non-cannabis waste to meet the required ratio without needing to add superfluous waste or having to bring in additional waste for augmentation.
Cannabis cultivation is energy-intensive, particularly when grown indoors. Energy is essential for lighting, environmental controls, and hydration at indoor cultivation operations. Access to energy infrastructure, such as power grids, can pose challenges, leading to temporary reliance on generators powered by fossil fuels that can impact air quality. Despite these challenges, indoor cultivation remains our primary method of cultivating cannabis, driven by market demand for consistent, high-quality cannabis products year-round, independent of adverse weather and fluctuating daylight. According to the National Cannabis Industry Association, as of October 2020, an estimated 63% of commercial cannabis cultivation occurred indoors with another 20% conducted in partial indoor operations, such as greenhouses. Currently, all of the Company’s cultivation is done indoors, including in enclosed greenhouse facilities. We anticipate conducting substantially all cultivation and production in indoor facilities.
Beyond the emissions generated from electricity, the cultivation, processing, and transportation of cannabis products all contribute to air emissions. Similar to many other crops, cannabis often relies upon water supplied through artificial irrigation. Agricultural runoff from cannabis cultivation can contain wastewater pollutants, which impact the environment. While traditional agricultural practices are associated with soil erosion, nutrient loss, reduction in organic carbon stored within the soil, and increased acidity, these environmental impacts are more prevalent in outdoor cultivation.
We believe that cannabis businesses aiming to incorporate environmentally sustainable practices must start with a comprehensive plan for cultivation and production. This plan should enable operators to consider the short, medium, and long-term impacts of their operations. Such a plan must include timelines for implementation, objective metrics to gauge progress, standards to monitor compliance, and periodic evaluation of the plan itself.
We are in the process of evaluating our operations to develop a comprehensive cultivation plan that takes into account the Company’s short, medium, and long-term environmental impacts. In doing so, we have identified emerging agricultural practices that are applicable to the cannabis industry and promote environmental sustainability. One early-stage practice for managing plant waste involves on-site anaerobic digestion utilizing plant waste to generate and capture methane, carbon dioxide, and nutrient-rich fertilizer. This approach not only diverts waste from landfills but also allows for the reuse of plant waste. To further environmental sustainability, cultivation and retail cannabis facilities could collaborate on establishing practices that promote and integrate reusable and refillable containers for their products, instead of disposable single-use packaging designs. Through proactive planning and the leveraging of business networks, the cannabis industry could collectively pursue more energy-efficient practices. Implementing LED lighting and efficient HVAC systems can significantly reduce energy use in indoor cultivation and processing facilities. Optimizing space utilization and scheduling the use of high energy equipment around peak demand periods could also help reduce the industry’s energy footprint. Existing emission control technologies have the potential to be broadly applied across the cannabis industry, mitigating adverse air quality impacts. Industry best practices should prioritize minimizing water usage, addressing agriculture runoff, and eliminating adverse impacts to water quality from any discharges back into the environment.
The federal legalization of cannabis would grant access to federal programs, including the U.S. Department of Agriculture for financial and technical assistance, the Small Business Administration for loan support, and the Environmental Protection Agency for grants, technical assistance, education, research, and traditional funding through nationally recognized financial institutions. Federal legalization has the potential to advance the industry, simultaneously safeguarding consumers and the environment through a national regulatory structure that prioritizes environmental sustainability.
Historically, expenditures for compliance with environmental laws and regulations have not been material to the Company’s financial results. In addition, we have not, and do not currently anticipate, material capital expenditures for environmental control facilities. However, they could become an increasing expense for the Company as we develop and implement a comprehensive plan for environmentally sustainable practices, especially if enhanced environmental laws and regulations are enacted for the cannabis industry.
Employees and Human Capital
The Company recruits, hires and promotes individuals that it believes are best qualified for each position, priding itself on using a selection process that recruits people who are trainable, cooperative and share our core values as a company. As of February 25, 2025, the Company had approximately 3,800 employees across its consolidated operating jurisdictions, including corporate, retail, cultivation and processing, both full- and part-time employees, and including but not limited to: finance and accounting, legal, human resources, regulatory and compliance, supply chain and operations, sales and marketing, commercial and cannabis agriculture, chemists, customer service, construction and project management, and real estate.
We offer a comprehensive package of company-sponsored benefits to our employees. Eligibility depends on the full-time or part-time status, employee location and other factors, and benefits include medical and dental plans, disability insurance, a 401(k) retirement and savings plan, employee assistance programs, paid time off and life insurance. Additionally, we believe in aligned incentives and utilize employee stock and incentive plans for a competitive total rewards program. We did not experience any work stoppages in 2024 that had a material impact on us, and we consider our relationship with our employees to be good.
As of February 25, 2025, approximately 600 employees at various cultivation and dispensary operations across our network are covered under one of 15 collective bargaining agreements (“CBAs”).
Social Equity
We believe that a more diverse and community-oriented focus leads to a more sustainable, inclusive and responsible cannabis industry. We aim to foster a more equitable industry where participation and success are possible regardless of the numerous factors that have historically held many people, businesses, and communities back. To support the growth of an inclusive cannabis industry, we have implemented social equity initiatives at the national level and in states and municipalities in which we operate. The social equity programs are generally designed to develop and carry out initiatives that seek to provide support and create opportunities in the cannabis industry for deprived communities, people of color and other disadvantaged minorities. In each state of operation, we seek to partner with local organizations to provide education, entrance into the cannabis industry, or other growth opportunities to both our employees and the community. To date, we have partnered with Legal Aid Chicago to host a virtual expungement and record sealing clinic to provide relief for those with nonviolent cannabis offenses. This includes our ongoing national fundraising and awareness efforts benefiting Mission Green, an organization that provides clemency, expungement and pardon support and advocacy for nonviolent individuals convicted of cannabis-related crimes, which has yielded more than $275,000 in proceeds to date.
Moreover, we have engaged various local social equity partners for our dispensary operations, including tens of thousands of dollars in donations to local food banks, resulting in thousands of hot meals for disproportionately impacted residents within the communities where we operate.
Several of our state-specific social equity programs include delineated funding for STEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics) coursework for disadvantaged youth, further addressing inequities within the local education system(s).
The Company has also subsidized local fire department and first responder agencies for annual supplies of Narcan to reduce the threat of overdose and death.
Lastly, the Company routinely hires within the communities where we operate.
The Company provided complimentary training to law enforcement agencies in Pennsylvania, Maryland, Connecticut and Virginia, as well as organizations such as the PA DUI Association and District Attorney's offices in Pennsylvania and Maryland. These sessions covered various product types available on the market, safe consumption practices, proper medication storage, and strategies to keep products out of children's reach. Additionally, the training addressed different routes of administration, their effects on the body, and the average time it takes for individuals to feel the effects.
In Florida, we provide medical cannabis education through certifying physicians, community outreach events and ongoing staff education, all of which are supported by a patient care call center with dozens of staff members for direct phone, email and online chat support. At the state and local level, we have focused on the region to create volunteer opportunities for employees and donate to charitable organizations, including matching employee donations.
Nationally, Verano has also conducted charitable campaigns supporting the Lynn Sage Breast Cancer Foundation for Breast Cancer Awareness Month, provided endowments for first generation college students, and hosted employee volunteer days. We plan to continue and expand these partnerships and events at the national, state and local levels to increase social equity in the cannabis industry.
Many states and cities have implemented social equity programs in connection with the legalization of medical or adult use cannabis and the Company has participated in some of these programs. These programs seek to ensure that people of color, other disadvantaged minorities and those with prior cannabis offenses, are afforded an opportunity to participate in a meaningful way in the cannabis industry. As new medical and adult use legislation is passed, multi-state operators such as the Company may be prevented, limited or discouraged from obtaining new licenses, renewing licenses or from participating in new markets or existing markets, or otherwise may be required to partner with people of color or other disadvantaged minorities.
Available Information
The Company’s website address is www.verano.com. Through this website, the Company’s filings with the SEC, including annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and all amendments to those reports, will be accessible (free of charge) as soon as reasonably practicable after materials are electronically filed with or furnished to the SEC. The information provided on the Company’s website is not part of this Form 10-K, unless otherwise noted.
The SEC maintains an Internet site (http://www.sec.gov) that contains reports, proxy and information statements and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC. Canadian securities authorities also maintain an Internet site (www.sedarplus.ca) that contains reports, circulars, annual financial statements and other information regarding the Company.

---

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
The Company is subject to risks, certain of which are described below. The occurrence of any one or more of these risks or uncertainties could have a material adverse effect on the value of any investment in the Company and the financial condition or operating results of the Company. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to the Company or that the Company currently deems immaterial may also impair the Company’s business operations. Due to the nature of the Company and its business, investors should carefully consider all such risks, including those set out in the discussion below, together with the other information in this Form 10-K and our other filings with the SEC and Canadian Securities Administrators.
Summary Risk Factors
The following is a summary of some of the risks and uncertainties that could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. You should read this summary together with the more detailed description of each risk factor contained below.
•the illegality of cannabis under federal law, the U.S. federal regulatory landscape and enforcement related to medical or adult use cannabis, including political risks, civil asset forfeiture and regulation by additional regulatory authorities;
•regulatory and political changes to U.S. federal, state and local laws related to medical or adult use cannabis, including political risks and regulation by additional regulatory authorities;
•the impacts of economic uncertainty stemming from disruptions in U.S. and global markets, inflation, rising interest rates, and changes in consumer and business confidence;
•our outstanding indebtedness and potential future indebtedness, including our ability to repay such indebtedness;
•reliance on key management;
•market acceptance of existing and new products and potential returns or recalls of our products;
•consumer acceptance of our brand portfolio;
•the accuracy of our forecasted demand for our products;
•the potential for fraudulent activity by employees, contractors and consultants;
•our exposure to growth-related operational and execution risks;
•potential negative findings in our clinical research with respect to our products;
•our ongoing litigation matter with Vireo Growth Inc., formerly known as Goodness Growth Holdings, Inc.;
•potential product liability claims;
•our exposure to natural phenomena and resulting potential uninsured or under insured losses;
•the risk that our property will be subject to civil asset forfeiture;
•our structure and our resulting reliance on the performance of our subsidiaries and affiliates;
•our expansion-by-acquisition strategy;
•our ability to acquire businesses and cannabis licenses in desired markets and the integration and operation of acquired businesses;
•the typically limited operations of businesses we acquire;
•the unconventional due diligence process in the cannabis industry;
•our ability to acquire and lease properties suitable for the cultivation, production and sale of cannabis;
•potential limited representations and warranties of businesses we may acquire;
•our acquisition of businesses in developing cannabis markets;
•our lack of portfolio diversification by industry or geography;
•our use of joint ventures, strategic partnerships and alliances;
•our contractual relationships with our consolidated variable interest entities;
•existing competition and new market entrants;
•the introduction of synthetic alternatives to cannabis products by pharmaceutical and other companies;
•the immaturity of the cannabis industry and limited comparable, competitive and established industry best practices;
•the availability of and our reliance on third-party suppliers, service providers, contractors and manufacturers, and any significant interruption of these relationships, including negative changes to quality, availability, pricing, trade policy and other economics;
•wholesale and retail price fluctuations;
•public opinion and perception of the cannabis industry;
•the availability of raw or other materials;
•rising or volatile energy costs;
•agricultural and environmental risks and the impacts of environmental regulations on the cannabis industry and environmental protections;
•physical security risks, such as theft;
•potential scrutiny from Canadian authorities;
•disparate state-by-state regulatory landscapes and licensing regimes for medical and adult use cannabis;
•the difficulties cannabis businesses face accessing and maintaining banking or financial services due to federal regulations;
•the cost and difficulty of complying with various regulatory schemes;
•the impact of state social equity legislation as it relates to the cannabis industry;
•the risk of high bonding and insurance costs;
•environmental regulations;
•effects of changes in laws and policies governing employees and by union organizing activity;
•potential divestment of licenses if required by regulatory authorities;
•our dependency on the banking industry;
•required public disclosure and governmental filings containing personal information of our officers, investors and other stakeholders;
•potential findings by regulatory authorities that one of our shareholders is unsuitable;
•the risk that our directors, officers, employees or investors are barred from entering the U.S.;
•the ability to, and constraints on, promoting and marketing cannabis products;
•potential U.S. Food and Drug Administration governance of the cannabis industry;
•the potential limitations on our ability to enforce our contracts or any liens granted to us;
•the potential lack of access to federal bankruptcy protections in the U.S.;
•reliance on information technology systems, the potential disclosure of personal information of patients and customers and cybersecurity risks;
•our reliance on third-party software providers;
•cost related to preserving our brand identity;
•our ability to protect our intellectual property due to limited intellectual property protection available for cannabis products and the potential infringement by third parties;
•potential infringement or misappropriation claims;
•the risk of financial crimes;
•the risk of receiving no return on our securities;
•our elimination of monetary liability and indemnification rights against our directors, officers and employees under British Columbia law;
•our dual class capital structure with Class A subordinate voting shares and Class B proportionate voting shares;
•the time and resources necessary to comply with corporate governance practices and securities rules and regulations in the U.S. and Canada;
•our management’s ability to maintain effective internal controls;
•potential dilution if we issue additional Subordinate Voting Shares or Proportionate Voting Shares;
•market perception of sales of a substantial amount of Subordinate Voting Shares;
•transfer restrictions on our Subordinate Voting Shares;
•price volatility of our Subordinate Voting Shares;
•our shareholders’ limited participation in our affairs;
•our expectation to not declare or pay out dividends;
•the concentration of our voting control; and
•the taxation of cannabis companies in the U.S., including the impact of Section 280E of the Code; and
•other risks described in this Form 10-K, as more particularly described herein.
Risks Related to Our Business and Operations - General
Cannabis, other than hemp, remains illegal under U.S. federal law, and therefore any change in federal enforcement could have material adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
To date, in the U.S. 38 states plus the District of Columbia and the U.S. territories of Puerto Rico, Guam, the Commonwealth of Northern Marina Islands, and the U.S. Virgin Islands have authorized comprehensive medical cannabis programs, 24 states plus the District of Columbia and the U.S. territories of Guam, the Commonwealth of Northern Mariana Islands, and the U.S. Virgin Islands have authorized comprehensive programs for medical and adult use (i.e. recreational) cannabis, and 7 states allow the use of low THC and high CBD products for specified medical uses.
Under U.S. federal law, however, those activities are illegal. Cannabis, other than hemp, is currently a Schedule I controlled substance under the CSA, which means it is viewed by the U.S. federal government as a drug that has a high potential for abuse and no therapeutic value. Therefore, even in U.S. states and territories that have legalized cannabis to some extent, the cultivation, possession and sale of cannabis violates the Controlled Substances Act and is punishable by imprisonment, substantial fines and forfeiture. Moreover, individuals and entities may violate U.S. federal law if they aid and abet another in violating the Controlled Substances Act, or conspire with another to violate the law. Violating the Controlled Substances Act is also a predicate for other crimes in the U.S., including money laundering laws and the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act. The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that the U.S. federal government has the authority to regulate and criminalize the sale, possession and use of cannabis in the U.S., even for individual medical purposes, regardless of whether it is legal under state law. To date, however, the U.S. federal government has not enforced those laws against companies (and their vendors) complying with state cannabis law. In October of 2022, the Biden Administration announced its intention to review the regulation of cannabis under the CSA by directing the Secretary of Health and Human Services and the Attorney General to initiate the administrative process to expeditiously review cannabis’s Schedule I status. In August of 2023, the HHS recommended to the DEA that cannabis be rescheduled to Schedule III under the CSA. On December 2, 2024, the DEA held a preliminary formal hearing regarding the rescheduling of cannabis, and additional hearings were scheduled from January 21, 2025 to March 6, 2025. On January 13, 2025, Chief Administrative Law Judge presiding over the rescheduling of cannabis ordered that the hearing scheduled for January 21, 2025 was cancelled, and that the proceedings in the matter were stayed, pending a resolution of an interlocutory appeal to the DEA Administrator. A joint status update must be provided to the tribunal ninety (90) days from the issuance of the order, and every ninety (90) days thereafter. In addition, in November 2024, Donald Trump was elected president of the U.S. and announced that Pam Bondi would be his pick for attorney general. While the ongoing rescheduling process could result in the decriminalization of cannabis for medical and adult-use by descheduling or rescheduling cannabis, there are no assurances if or when there could be any change in the regulation of cannabis under the CSA, particularly due to the change in administration and the stay to the rulemaking process. Although we believe that our business activities are compliant with applicable state and local laws in the United States, strict compliance with state and local cannabis laws would not provide a defense to any federal proceeding which may be brought against us. Any such proceedings may result in a material adverse effect on us. We derive substantially all of our revenues from the cannabis industry. The enforcement of applicable U.S. federal laws poses a significant risk to us.
The likelihood of any future adverse enforcement against companies complying with state cannabis laws remains uncertain. In 2018, then-U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions issued the Sessions Memorandum rescinding the DOJ’s previous guidance under the Cole Memorandum that had given federal prosecutors discretion not to enforce federal law in states that legalized cannabis, as long as the state’s legal regime adequately addressed specified federal priorities. The Sessions Memorandum, which remains in effect, states that each U.S. Attorney’s Office should follow established principles that govern all federal prosecutions when deciding which cannabis activities to prosecute. As a result, federal prosecutors can use their prosecutorial discretion to decide to prosecute state-legal cannabis activities. Since the Sessions Memorandum was issued, however, U.S. Attorneys have not targeted state law compliant cannabis entities. The policy of not prosecuting companies complying with state cannabis laws continued under U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland. The DOJ may change its enforcement policies at any time, with or without advance notice, under acting U.S. Attorney General, James McHenry, or pending nominee, Pam Bondi.
Additionally, since 2014, versions of the U.S. omnibus spending bill have included a provision prohibiting the DOJ from using appropriated funds to prevent states from implementing their medical-use cannabis laws. While the omnibus spending bill affords some protection to medical cannabis businesses, we also operate adult use cannabis businesses that are permissible under state and local laws. Consequently, some of our operations may be outside any protections extended to medical-use cannabis under the spending bill provision. This could subject us to greater and different U.S. federal legal and other risks as compared to businesses where cannabis is sold exclusively for medical use, which, in turn, could materially and adversely affect our business. Furthermore, any change in the U.S. federal government’s enforcement posture with respect to state-licensed cannabis sales, including the enforcement postures of individual federal prosecutors in judicial districts where we operate, would lead to an inability to execute our business plan, likely resulting in significant losses with respect to our customer base and adversely affecting our business, financial condition and results of operations.
In addition to criminal liability for producing, manufacturing, distributing and selling cannabis, other subsections of the CSA criminalize related activities with expanded sentences and increased penalties for corporations. For example, entities or persons who manage or control a property and knowingly make that property available for the purposes of manufacturing, distributing or using any controlled substances can be found liable under the Controlled Substances Act. We own properties on which activities prohibited by the Controlled Substances Act occur. Therefore, a federal prosecutor could prosecute us as an owner of “drug-involved premises” and we could be found to violate U.S. federal law by virtue of these assets. Additionally, we intend to acquire and invest in businesses that are directly or indirectly engaged in the medical and adult use cannabis industry in the U.S. where state and local law permits such activities.
Our anticipated funding of businesses engaged in the medical and adult use cannabis industry, whether through loans or through other forms of investment, is currently illegal under applicable U.S. federal laws. Any criminal charges brought against us could result not only in the inability to execute our business plan, but the cessation of our operations and could further result in significant fines, penalties and losses, which would adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
THE CONSEQUENCES OF SUCH GOVERNMENTAL ENFORCEMENT WOULD BE MATERIALLY DETRIMENTAL TO US, OUR BUSINESS AND THE VALUE OF THE SUBORDINATE VOTING SHARES AND COULD RESULT IN THE FORFEITURE OR SEIZURE OF ALL OR SUBSTANTIALLY ALL OF OUR ASSETS.
There is a substantial risk of regulatory or political change to federal, state and local laws permitting cannabis activities. Such changes could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Continued development of the U.S. cannabis industry depends upon legislative authorization of cannabis at the federal, state and local level. The status quo of, or progress in, the federal or state regulated U.S. cannabis industry, while encouraging, is not assured and any number of factors could slow or halt further progress in this area. The political environment surrounding the cannabis industry in the U.S. in general can be volatile and the regulatory framework remains in flux. While there may be ample public support for legislative action permitting the production and use of cannabis, numerous factors impact and can delay the legislative and regulatory processes. If pro-cannabis regulations are not enacted, or enacted but subsequently repealed or amended, or enacted with prolonged phase-in periods, our growth targets and prospects, and thus, the effect on the return of investor capital, could be extended or reduced.
Further, there is no guarantee that, at some future date, voters or the applicable state legislative bodies will not repeal, overturn or limit any such legislation legalizing the cultivation, manufacture, sale, distribution or consumption of medical or adult use cannabis. Local and city ordinances may strictly limit or restrict the applicability of state laws to their jurisdictions and the distribution of cannabis in their jurisdictions in a manner that may make it extremely difficult or impossible to transact business that is necessary for the continued operation of the cannabis industry generally and us specifically. Although our operations are legal under the laws of the states in which our business operates, local governments have the ability to limit, restrict and ban cannabis businesses from operating within their jurisdiction. Land use, zoning, ordinances and similar federal, state and local laws could be adopted or changed and have a material adverse effect on our business.
In addition, the rule making process to reschedule cannabis to a Schedule III substance under the CSA is ongoing at the time of this filing. We cannot predict the effects such rescheduling would have on our business, and there is no guarantee that the formal rule making process will happen within a certain timeframe or that cannabis will be rescheduled. If cannabis were rescheduled to a Schedule III substance, we cannot predict the federal regulations that may be put into place regarding the cannabis industry. In particular, Donald Trump was elected president of the U.S. in 2024. While Donald Trump has generally expressed support for regulations that are favorable to the U.S. cannabis industry, there is no guarantee that he will agree with President Biden’s review of the scheduling of cannabis under the CSA, or how the new administration, including new attorney general, will affect the formal rule making process. In addition, particularly considering the U.S. congressional elections that occurred in 2024, there is no guarantee that on-going pro-cannabis federal legislative efforts such as the State Reform Act or the SAFER Act will continue, or that legislation that further restricts the cannabis industry at the federal U.S. level will not be proposed or passed. Many states held elections in 2024 as well, and as such, we cannot predict if newly-elected state officials will adversely change the regulatory schemes regarding cannabis in the states where we operate.
Any one of these factors could slow or halt additional legislative authorization of cannabis, which could harm our business, financial condition and results of operations. If the U.S. federal government begins to enforce U.S. federal laws relating to cannabis in states where the sale and use of cannabis is currently legal, or if existing state laws are repealed or curtailed, our business or operations in those states or under those laws would be materially and adversely affected. As they amend or develop legislation and regulations, state and local regulators and legislatures may use the regulatory process to slow the growth of multi-state operators like us, with the intent of creating increased opportunities for resident farmers and entrepreneurs, which could severely restrict our ability to operate in those jurisdictions. Federal actions against any individual or entity engaged in the cannabis industry or a substantial repeal of cannabis related legislation could adversely affect our business and our assets or investments. Maintaining compliance with complex and ever-changing regulations and laws, including sometimes unclear regulations and laws, can be a difficult task, and a materially compliant business can be found in violation of one or more laws, rules or regulations while remaining materially or substantially compliant with applicable state cannabis laws.
Challenging U.S. and global economic conditions may negatively impact our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Any disruptions and volatility in U.S. and global financial markets, inflation, potential recession and declining consumer and business confidence could lead to decreased levels of consumer spending and higher costs. Our operations have been, and could continue to be affected by inflation, and could be effected by any potential recession, real or perceived market disruptions, the unemployment level, the impact of a federal government shutdown, or rising or elevated interest rates reach levels that influence consumer trends and spending and, consequently, impact our sales volume, pricing, cost of goods and profitability. The Company takes a cautious approach in allocating its capital to maximize its returns while ensuring appropriate liquidity. Given inflation and the uncertainty of the future economic environment, the Company has taken additional measures in monitoring and deploying its capital to minimize the potentially negative impact on its operations and expansion plans. There is no guarantee that these measures will minimize such potentially negative impacts and that we may not continue to take further measures in the future. In addition, economic uncertainty may make it more difficult to access financing at the rates we have received previously.
These macroeconomic developments could negatively impact our business, which depends on the general economic environment and levels of consumer spending. In addition, macroeconomic conditions could cause budgetary pressures for our wholesale and end customers, which could result in a delay or reduction in their spending, and in turn could adversely affect our business. We may not be able to maintain our existing customers or attract new customers, or we may be forced to increase or reduce the price of our products. We are unable to predict the likelihood of the occurrence, duration, or severity of a recession or other disruptions in the U.S. credit and financial markets and adverse U.S. and global economic conditions. Any general or market-specific economic downturn could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
The Company and certain of our subsidiaries are borrowers under secured debt facilities, and we may be unable to repay, renew or refinance our indebtedness when it becomes due. Further, our debt facilities contain covenants that restrict our business and they may be difficult or costly for us to comply with. If we are unable to repay, renew or refinance our debts as they become due, it would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations and the value of the Subordinate Voting Shares.
The Company and certain of our subsidiaries are borrowers of secured indebtedness and are subject to risks typically associated with secured debt financing, which are heightened by the cannabis regulatory environment in the U.S. Our cash flows could be insufficient to satisfy the amount of required payments of principal and interest and we may not be able to repay our indebtedness. Our ability to make scheduled payments of principal and interest on our indebtedness when due depends on our future cash flow which is subject to the financial performance and results of our business, the value of our assets, prevailing economic conditions, the cannabis regulatory environment, prevailing interest rate levels and other financial, competitive and operational factors impacting the cannabis industry, many of which are beyond our control.
The covenants of our indebtedness limit our ability to engage in activities that may be in the Company’s long-term best interest. In addition, compliance with the financial, operational and reporting covenants, including obligations to maintain minimum cash balances at certain financial institutions, increases our legal and financial costs, make certain activities more difficult or restricted, and may be time-consuming or costly and increase demand on the Company’s systems and resources. Our failure to comply with any of these covenants could result in a default, which could result in increased default interest rates, the acceleration of repayment of our debt or our lenders’ foreclosure on our assets securing our indebtedness.
We may not be able to renew or refinance our indebtedness, including indebtedness under the 2022 Credit Agreement or the Loan Agreement on substantially similar terms, or at all, particularly in an environment of economic uncertainty such as the one discussed above in “-Challenging U.S. and global economic conditions may negatively impact our business, financial condition and results of operations.” Our ability to access short-term and long-term lending and capital markets to obtain, and the availability of acceptable terms and conditions of, financing are impacted by many factors, including the liquidity and volatility of the overall lending and capital markets, the cannabis regulatory environment and the current state of the economy, including the cannabis industry. There can be no assurances that we will be able to access the lending and capital markets to refinance our indebtedness. We may have to pay higher interest rates and additional fees and expenses, and we may have to agree to terms that could increase the cost of our indebtedness structure. If we are unable to renew or refinance our indebtedness on terms that are not materially less favorable than the terms currently available to us or obtain alternative or additional financing arrangements, we may not be able to timely repay our indebtedness, which may result in a default under our indebtedness, which could result in our lenders’ foreclosure on our assets securing our indebtedness.
The Company and our subsidiaries may incur additional indebtedness, and we may be unable to borrow on better or substantially similar terms to our existing indebtedness. New indebtedness facilities may contain covenants that further restrict our business and they may be difficult or costly for us to comply with. If we were to incur additional indebtedness that increases the cost of our indebtedness structure, it would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations and the value of the Subordinate Voting Shares.
We may incur additional indebtedness. As funds are borrowed, additional interest and debt service increases the expense of operating our business. In addition, lenders of future borrowings may require additional restrictions on our business and operations and additional assets to secure our obligations. Our ability to access short-term and long-term lending and capital markets to obtain, and the availability of acceptable terms and conditions of, financing are impacted by many factors, including the liquidity and volatility of the overall lending and capital markets, the cannabis regulatory environment and the current state of the economy, including the cannabis industry. We may have to pay higher interest rates and additional fees and expenses, and we may have to agree to terms that could increase the cost of our indebtedness structure.
We rely on the expertise of our management team and other employees experienced in the cannabis industry, and the loss of key personnel could negatively affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our success largely depends upon the continued services of our executive officers and management team members. If one or more of our executive officers or management members is unable or unwilling to continue in his or her present position, we may not be able to replace such individual readily, if at all. Additionally, we may incur additional expenses to recruit and retain new executive officers and management members and personnel with experience in the cannabis industry. We do not maintain “key person” life insurance on any of our executive officers. Because of these factors, the loss of the services of any key persons could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We face risks related to our products.
We have committed and expect to continue committing significant resources and capital to develop and market existing products and new products and services. These products are relatively untested in the marketplace, and we cannot assure that we will achieve market acceptance for new products and services that we may offer in the future, or that our products that achieve market acceptance will maintain that acceptance over time. Moreover, these and other new products and services may be subject to significant competition with offerings by new and existing competitors. In addition, new products and services may pose a variety of challenges and require us to attract additional qualified employees. The failure to successfully develop and market these new products and services could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. We also face competition from hemp and illicit market products that are not subject to testing or regulation by state agencies and that are not subject to the same taxes state-legal cannabis businesses face, and may be priced significantly lower than our products.
Our products may be returned or recalled, which could damage our brand identity and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Despite quality control procedures, cultivators, manufacturers and distributors of cannabis products are sometimes subject to the recall or return of their products for a variety of reasons, including product defects, such as contamination, unintended harmful side effects or interactions with other substances, packaging safety and inadequate or inaccurate labeling disclosure. If any of our products or any of the products that we purchase from a third party are recalled due to an alleged product defect or for any other reason, we could be required to incur the unexpected expense of the recall and any legal proceedings that might arise in connection with the recall, and may lose a significant amount of sales and may not be able to replace those sales at an acceptable margin or at all. A recall or return of our products could lead to a deterioration in our brand identity, decreased demand for our products or limit our ability to purchase from a third-party and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We are dependent on the popularity of consumer acceptance of our brand portfolio.
Our ability to generate revenue and be successful in the implementation of our business plan is dependent on consumer acceptance of and demand for our products. Acceptance of our products depends on several factors, including availability, cost, ease of use, familiarity of use, convenience, effectiveness, safety and reliability. If customers do not accept our products, or if such products fail to adequately meet customers’ needs and expectations, our ability to continue generating revenues could be reduced. As the number of available licenses increase in the markets in which we operate, and the illicit market and psychoactive hemp-based products proliferate, additional competition and increased product availability may result in competitors undercutting our prices. From time to time, we may need to reduce our prices in response to competitive and customer pressures and to maintain our market share, which could materially reduce our revenues.
Our sales volumes are difficult to forecast and a failure in the expected demand for our products to materialize could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
As a result of the early stage of the cannabis industry, ongoing U.S. state and federal regulatory and policy changes for medical and adult use cannabis and unreliable levels of market supply, the market data available for cannabis demand can be limited. We must rely largely on our own market research to forecast sales, as detailed forecasts are not generally obtainable from other sources in the states in which our business operates. Additionally, any market research and our own projections of sales, demographics, demand and similar consumer research, are based on assumptions from limited and unreliable market data. A failure in the expected level of demand for our products to materialize as a result of competition, regulatory changes, technological change or other factors could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
There is a risk of fraudulent or illegal activity by our employees, contractors and consultants, and any fraudulent or illegal acts could negatively affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We are exposed to the risk that our employees, independent contractors and consultants may engage in fraudulent or other illegal activity. Misconduct by these parties could include intentional, reckless or negligent conduct or disclosure of unauthorized activities that violates: (i) government regulations; (ii) manufacturing standards; (iii) federal and state healthcare fraud and abuse laws and regulations; (iv) laws that require the true, complete and accurate reporting of financial information or data; (v) our contractual agreements; or (vi) our policies and code of ethics. It may not always be possible for us to identify and deter misconduct by our employees and other third parties, and the precautions taken by us to detect and prevent this activity may not be effective in controlling unknown or unmanaged risks or losses or in protecting us from governmental investigations or other actions or lawsuits stemming from a failure to be in compliance with such laws or regulations. If any such investigations or actions are instituted against us, and we are not successful in defending them or asserting our rights, those actions could have a significant impact on our business, including the imposition of civil, criminal and administrative penalties, damages, monetary fines, contractual damages, reputational harm, diminished profits and future earnings and curtailment of our operations, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We are subject to growth-related operational and execution risks and our inability to mitigate and address these risks would have a material adverse effect on our business plan, financial results and financial condition.
We are subject to growth-related operational and execution risks, including integration of acquired businesses, facility, personnel, and other capacity constraints, efficient management of assets and pressure on our internal systems and controls. Our ability to manage growth effectively will require us to continue to implement and improve our integration processes and operational and financial systems and to expand, train and manage our employee base. Our inability to effectively manage our growth may have a material adverse effect on our business financial results and financial condition.
Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results, and if our actual operations differ materially from management’s expectations, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our growth is in large part attributable to acquisitions of existing cannabis businesses and licenses. Our past operational performance may not be indicative of our future operating results. There can be no assurance that the revenue growth, cashflow, operating margins and other historical operating results achieved by us will be achieved by us going forward, and our financial performance and operating results may be materially different.
Clinical research with respect to our products is ongoing, and negative findings could lead to rollbacks of state legalizations laws and negative public perceptions of cannabis, which would negatively affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Research in the U.S. and internationally regarding the medical benefits, viability, safety, efficacy, dosing and social acceptance of cannabis or isolated cannabinoids remains in early stages. There have been relatively few clinical trials on the benefits of cannabis or isolated cannabinoids. Although we rely on the articles, reports and studies that support our beliefs regarding the medical benefits, viability, safety, efficacy, dosing and social acceptance of cannabis, future research and clinical trials may prove such beliefs to be incorrect, or could raise concerns regarding, and public perceptions relating to, cannabis. Further, the cannabis industry is highly dependent upon consumer perception, which can be significantly influenced by scientific research or findings, regulatory investigations, litigation, media attention and other publicity regarding the consumption of cannabis products. There can be no assurance that future scientific research or findings, regulatory investigations, litigation, media attention or other publicity will be favorable to the cannabis market or any particular product, or consistent with earlier publicity.
Future research studies and clinical trials may reach negative conclusions regarding the medical benefits, viability, safety, efficacy, dosing, social acceptance or other facts and perceptions related to cannabis, which could lead to rollbacks in state regulation or otherwise have a material adverse effect on the demand for our products with the potential to lead to a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. There is no assurance that such adverse research studies or clinical trials will not arise.
We are currently involved in litigation with GGH arising from our termination of the GGH Arrangement Agreement. Any unfavorable verdict or settlement of the litigation with GGH could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and the Subordinate Voting Shares. We also may be a party to other material litigation that requires outsized expenses or results in negative outcomes that could affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and Subordinate Voting Shares.
We are currently involved in litigation with Vireo Growth Inc., formerly known as Goodness Growth Holdings, Inc. (“GGH”). On January 31, 2022, we entered into an Arrangement Agreement (the “GGH Arrangement Agreement”) with GGH, pursuant to which we agreed to acquire all of the issued and outstanding equity interests of GGH in exchange for equity interests in the Company. On October 13, 2022, we provided written notice to GGH of the exercise of our termination rights under the GGH Arrangement Agreement. On October 21, 2022, GGH filed suit against us in the Supreme Court of British Columbia alleging that the Company breached (i) the GGH Arrangement Agreement through, among other things, the purported wrongful repudiation of the GGH Arrangement Agreement, (ii) the duty of good faith, and (iii) the duty of honest performance in contract. We filed a counterclaim on November 14, 2022 asserting that GGH owes us a termination fee in the amount of $14,875,000, or alternatively, the reimbursement of out-of-pocket fees and expenses of up to $3,000,000 as a result of our termination of the GGH Arrangement Agreement, which was based upon our belief that GGH breached covenants and representations in the GGH Arrangement Agreement and the occurrence of other termination events. GGH filed a response to such counterclaim on December 7, 2022, in which GGH denied it was obligated to pay any termination fee or transaction expenses.
On May 2, 2024, GGH filed an application with the Supreme Court of British Columbia seeking an order granting summary trial in the ongoing litigation between the Company and GGH regarding the GGH Arrangement Agreement. In the application, GGH stated it is seeking $860,900,000 in damages, plus costs and interest (the “GGH Application for Summary Trial”). On June 19, 2024, the Company filed an application in response seeking: (i) dismissal of the GGH Application for Summary Trial on the grounds that the issues raised by it are not suitable for disposition by summary trial and will not assist the efficient resolution of the proceeding; and (ii) an order that the report on damages filed by GGH in support of the GGH Application for Summary Trial is inadmissible and shall be excluded from evidence in the trial, or any summary trial, of this matter. On September 17, 2024, the Company filed an amended response and counterclaim with the Supreme Court of British Columbia, primarily in response to communications recently disclosed by GGH.
We can provide no guarantees or assurances that we will prevail or be able to settle this lawsuit or our counterclaim on favorable terms, if at all. This lawsuit, our counterclaim and future litigation, including any shareholder litigation or governmental or regulatory investigation, could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition, reputation and cash flows, as well as on the market price of the Subordinate Voting Shares.
The Company or our subsidiaries may become party to litigation from time to time which could be concluded in a way which is adverse to us and could adversely affect our business operations and use significant resources. Although the results of lawsuits and claims cannot be predicted with certainty, defending and prosecuting these claims is costly and can impose a significant burden on management and employees. Any litigation to which we are a party may result in an unfavorable judgment that may not be reversed on appeal, or we may decide to settle lawsuits on similarly unfavorable terms. Any such negative outcome could result in payments of substantial monetary damages or fines, changes to our business practices, and could have a material adverse effect upon our business, financial condition, results of operations and the Subordinate Voting Shares.
We may be subject to product liability claims which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We manufacture, process and distribute products designed to be ingested and used topically by humans, and therefore we face an inherent risk of exposure to product liability claims, regulatory action and litigation if our products are alleged to have caused loss or injury. In addition, the manufacture and sale of cannabis products involve risk of injury to consumers due to tampering by unauthorized third parties or product contamination. Previously unknown adverse reactions resulting from human consumption and use of cannabis products alone or in combination with other medications or substances could occur. Although we have quality control procedures in place, we may be subject to various product liability claims, including, among others, that the products produced by us, or the products that we purchase from third party licensed producers, caused injury or illness, include inadequate instructions for use or include inadequate warnings concerning possible side effects or interactions with other substances. A product liability claim or regulatory action against us could result in increased costs, could adversely affect our reputation, and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. There can be no assurances that product liability insurance will be obtained or maintained on acceptable terms or with adequate coverage against potential liabilities.
We are exposed to various operational risks and natural phenomena, any of which may be uninsured or underinsured, and uninsured losses could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We may be affected by a number of operational risks and natural phenomena for which we may not be adequately insured, including labor disputes; catastrophic accidents; fires; blockades or other acts of social activism; equipment defects, malfunction and failures; changes in the regulatory environment; impact of non-compliance with laws and regulations (both related and unrelated to the cannabis industry); the outbreak of a global pandemic; and inclement weather conditions, hurricanes, floods, earthquakes and other natural disasters. Such risks can cause interruption of operations, shortage of staff, disruption of supply chain, market volatility, personal injury, loss of life, suspension of operations, damage to facilities, damage to or destruction of property, equipment and the environment. There is no assurance that the foregoing risks and hazards will not result in damage to, or destruction of, our properties, dispensary facilities and cultivation and production facilities, or cause personal injury or death, environmental damage or have an adverse impact on our operations, costs, monetary losses, potential legal liability and adverse governmental action, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
In addition, there can be no assurance that we will not encounter hazardous conditions, such as asbestos or lead, at the sites of the real estate used to operate our business, which may delay the development of our business. Climate change or significant weather events may accelerate or exacerbate environmental conditions in ways that adversely affect the business due to potential negative effects on agricultural conditions, increased difficulty in construction projects to support our operations, and ownership or leasing of real property generally. Upon encountering a hazardous condition, work at our facilities may be suspended. If we receive notice of a hazardous condition, we may be required to correct the condition prior to continuing construction. If additional hazardous conditions were present, it would likely delay construction and may require significant expenditure of our resources to correct the conditions. Such conditions could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We plan to continuously monitor our operations for quality control and safety and to mitigate risk. However, there are no assurances that our safety procedures will always prevent damage and we may be affected by liability or sustain losses in respect of risks and hazards. Although we maintain insurance coverage, such insurance does not cover all of the potential risks associated with our business and operations, including natural disasters.
The cost of insurance for companies engaged in cannabis-related activities is higher than many other industries and we may be unable to maintain insurance to cover these risks at economically feasible premiums, in part or at all. In addition, insurance coverage may not be available to us or may not be adequate to cover any resulting liability. In certain locations where we operate, such as Florida, it may be difficult to get insurance at reasonable costs, or at all, that will adequately cover adverse weather events such as hurricanes. Moreover, insurance against risks such as environmental pollution or other hazards encountered in our operations is not generally available on acceptable terms. The occurrence of a significant uninsured claim, a claim in excess of the insurance coverage limits then maintained by us, or a claim at a time when we are not able to obtain liability insurance, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our property is subject to risk of civil asset forfeiture.
Because the cannabis industry remains illegal under U.S. federal law, any property owned by participants in the cannabis industry that is either used in the course of conducting or comprises the proceeds of a cannabis business could be subject to seizure by law enforcement and subsequent civil asset forfeiture. Even if the owner of the property were never charged with a crime, the property in question could still be seized and subject to an administrative proceeding by which, with minimal process, it could become subject to forfeiture.
Risks Related to Our Business and Operations - Organizational Structure and Acquisition-Based Strategy
The Company is the ultimate holding company in its corporate organizational structure. As such, the Company depends on the performance of its subsidiaries and affiliates and therefore any material declines in the financial health or prospects of these entities will adversely affect our business, liquidity, financial condition and results of operations.
We are a holding company, and the vast majority of our assets are the ownership interests we hold in our subsidiaries. As a result, our investors, lenders and creditors are subject to the risks attributable to our subsidiaries. As a holding company, we conduct all of our business operations through our subsidiaries and affiliates, which generate all of our revenues. Consequently, to the extent we cannot raise funds from the issuance of debt or equity securities, our cash flow and ability to complete our business plan and growth objectives are dependent on the earnings of our subsidiaries and the distribution of those earnings to us. The ability of our subsidiaries and affiliates to pay dividends and other distributions to us or to any of our other subsidiaries will depend on their operating results and are subject to laws and regulations which require that solvency and capital standards be maintained as well as contractual restrictions contained in mortgages, credit facilities and other similar agreements. In the event of a liquidation or reorganization of any of our subsidiaries or affiliates, lenders and trade creditors may be entitled to payment of their claims from the assets of such subsidiaries or affiliates before us. Accordingly, any decline in the financial performance or prospects of any of our subsidiaries or affiliates will adversely affect our investment in such subsidiaries or affiliates, the value of our assets and our ability to receive cashflow and realize a return on our investment.
We engage in acquisitions, dispositions and other strategic transactions, which present numerous execution risks. We may encounter unforeseen obstacles related to these transactions that would negatively impact our business, financial condition and results of operations and the Subordinate Voting Shares.
Material acquisitions, dispositions and other strategic transactions involve a number of execution risks, including: (i) potential disruptions to our ongoing business; (ii) distraction of management; (iii) our becoming more financially leveraged; (iv) the anticipated benefits and cost savings of those transactions not being realized fully, or taking longer to realize than expected; (v) an increase in the scope and complexity of our operations, including in employee relations as a result of growth or acquiring existing union and collective bargaining agreements; and (vi) a loss or reduction of control over our assets. Additionally, we may issue Subordinate Voting Shares and other equity interests as consideration in such transactions, which issuances would dilute our existing shareholders’ equity holdings in the Company.
Our acquisitions are subject to varying degrees of approval which include in some cases, among other things, (i) approval by the Company’s shareholders; (ii) approval by local and state authorities of the change in ownership in the cannabis licensee or the deemed sale, transfer or assignment of the cannabis-related licenses; and (iii) other state and local regulatory approvals. We are unable to predict when all required approvals or authorizations will be obtained, if at all.
After acquisitions are consummated, the presence of one or more material liabilities of an acquired company or limitations on its operations that are unknown to us at the time of acquisition could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We may not be able to identify and acquire businesses and cannabis licenses in desired markets or successfully integrate acquired businesses and assets that we deem necessary to achieve our desired growth, which would negatively impact our business plans, financial condition and results of operations.
The ability to achieve desired growth will depend in part on our ability to identify, evaluate, successfully negotiate and consummate acquisition and investment opportunities with target companies. Achieving this objective in a cost-effective manner is a product of our sourcing capabilities, our management of the negotiation and investment process, the ability to structure and provide purchase prices on terms that are attractive to target companies as well as our access to financing on acceptable terms. Failure to successfully consummate and integrate suitable acquisitions and investments could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Many of the businesses that we acquire or invest in are early-stage companies that may have limited operations or revenues. These businesses may underperform our targets and projections and thus negatively impact our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We may acquire and make investments in businesses that we perceive to have potential future value but have little operating history, no significant sources of operating cash flow and no revenues from operations. Our resources and opportunity costs spent on these companies are subject to risks and uncertainties that new businesses with no operating history or limited financial results may face. In particular, there is a risk that these early-stage businesses will not be able to meet anticipated performance targets or financial projections, which could have a material adverse effect on our business plans, financial condition and results of operations.
The uncertain, fragmented and early-stage nature of the cannabis industry often results in an unconventional due diligence process and acquisition and transaction terms that could result in unknown and materially detrimental consequences to us.
The uncertainty inherent in various aspects of the cannabis industry can result in what otherwise would be considered inadequate acquisition and investment due diligence information and assumption of uncertain legal consequences relative to a target acquisition or investment. The reluctance of banks and other financial institutions to facilitate financial transactions in the cannabis industry can result in inadequate and unverifiable financial information about target acquisitions and investments, as well as cash management practices that are vulnerable to theft and fraud. The lack of established, traditional sources of financing for industry participants can result in unusual and uncertain arrangements affecting the ownership and obligations of a target investment. The reluctance of some professionals and advisors to represent cannabis-industry participants in financings and other business transactions can result in the lack of documentation setting forth the terms of agreements and understandings, inadequately documented transactions, and transactions that in whole or in part do not comply with applicable state or local laws, among other detrimental consequences. We have acquired or invested in, and may in the future acquire or invest in, businesses and companies that are or may become party to unforeseen legal proceedings, have inadequate financial and other due diligence information, employ vulnerable cash management practices, lack written or adequate legal documents governing significant transactions, lack policies and processes with respect to compliance with laws and otherwise have known or unknown conditions that could be detrimental to its business and assets, which in turn could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Competition for the acquisition and leasing of properties suitable for the cultivation, production and sale of medical and adult use cannabis may impede our ability to make acquisitions or increase the cost of these acquisitions, which could negatively impact our business, financial condition and results of operation.
We compete for the acquisition of properties suitable for the cultivation, production and sale of medical and adult use cannabis with entities engaged in agriculture and real estate investment activities, including corporate agriculture companies, cultivators, producers and sellers of cannabis. In addition, in certain markets the local governments have authority to choose where any cannabis establishment will be located. These authorized areas are frequently removed from other retail operations. Because the cannabis industry remains illegal under U.S. federal law, the disadvantaged tax status of businesses deriving their income from cannabis, and the reluctance of the banking industry to support cannabis businesses, it may be difficult for us to locate and obtain the rights to operate at various preferred locations. Property owners may violate their mortgages by leasing to us, and those property owners that are willing to allow use of their facilities may require payment of above fair market value rents to reflect the scarcity of such locations and the risks and costs of providing such facilities. All of these factors may prevent us from acquiring and leasing desirable properties, may cause an increase in the price we must pay for properties or may result in us having to lease our properties on less favorable terms than we expect.
Our competitors may have greater financial and operational resources than we do and may be willing to pay more for certain assets or may be willing to accept more risk than we believe can be prudently managed. In particular, larger companies may enjoy significant competitive advantages that result from, among other things, a lower cost of capital and enhanced operating efficiencies.
Our competitors may also adopt transaction structures similar to ours, which would decrease our competitive advantage in offering flexible transaction terms. In addition, due to a number of factors, including but not limited to potential greater clarity of the laws and regulations governing medical cannabis by state and federal governments, the number of entities and the amount of funds competing for suitable investment properties may increase, resulting in increased demand and increased prices paid for these properties. If we pay higher prices for properties or enter into leases for such properties on less favorable terms than we expect, our profitability and ability to generate cash flow may be adversely impacted. Increased competition for properties may also preclude us from acquiring those properties that would generate attractive returns to us.
We may purchase businesses and assets with limited representations and warranties from, or recourse to, the sellers of those businesses and assets. These limited representations and warranties and lack of recourse could result in no or limited legal remedies for unknown and materially detrimental problems with the business or assets we acquire, which in turn would negatively impact our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We may acquire businesses and assets with only limited representations and warranties from the sellers regarding the quality of the business, its operating results, liabilities and risks and quality of assets. We may have limited or no recourse to the sellers if they breached their representations or warranties in the applicable transaction documents. As a result, if defects or liabilities are subsequently discovered, we may not be able to pursue a claim for damages against the sellers. The extent of damages that we may incur as a result of such matters cannot be predicted, but potentially could have a material adverse effect on the value of our assets and revenue streams and financial performance. Further, some of our remedies and recourse may consist of obligations of cannabis operations, and our remedies may be limited if deemed unenforceable under federal laws or for other regulatory reasons.
We may enter or acquire businesses in developing markets where regulation of medical or adult use cannabis is uncertain or in process, exposing us to additional risks and expenses with respect to regulatory compliance.
We may enter markets or acquire businesses and assets in developing markets where the regulation of cannabis is uncertain. The medical or adult use cannabis regulatory regime in a market may not be settled at such time and final regulations with respect to cannabis licenses may still be unknown. If final regulations differ from our expectations, or the existing terms of the acquired license are changed by the adoption of final regulations, we may realize less value from the expansion or acquisition than expected. This possibility, as well as other general uncertainties surrounding cannabis markets with regulation that is not established, could have negative consequences detrimental to our business plan and asset values, which in turn could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our business and asset portfolio are not highly diversified by either industry or geographically. If our cannabis business and assets underperform, our business, financial condition and results of operations would be negatively impacted.
Our assets are associated with the medical and adult use cannabis industry. While we may purchase other assets and make investments not limited to the cannabis industry, we intend to maintain and continue to acquire businesses, licenses and assets related to the cannabis industry. Thus, we have, and are expected to have, limited industry diversity as to asset type and revenue generation. Additionally, our business is geographically concentrated in the U.S. states in which we hold licenses to operate cannabis-related businesses. This lack of industry and geographic diversification increases the risk associated with the revenue stream we expect to receive from our businesses and assets and, as a result, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our use of joint ventures, strategic partnerships and alliances may expose us to risks associated with jointly owned investments.
We currently operate parts of our business through joint ventures with other companies or individuals, and we may enter into additional joint ventures and strategic alliances in the future. Joint venture investments may involve risks not otherwise present in investments made solely by us, including: (i) we may not control the joint ventures; (ii) our joint venture partners may not agree to distributions that we believe are appropriate; (iii) where we do not have substantial decision-making authority, we may experience impasses or disputes with our joint venture partners on certain decisions, which could require us to expend additional resources to resolve such impasses or disputes, including litigation or arbitration; (iv) our joint venture partners may become insolvent or bankrupt, fail to fund their share of capital contributions or fail to fulfill their obligations as a joint venture partner; (v) the arrangements governing our joint ventures may contain certain conditions or milestone events that may never be satisfied or achieved; (vi) our joint venture partners may have business or economic interests that are inconsistent with ours and may take actions contrary to our interests; (vii) we may suffer losses as a result of actions taken by our joint venture partners with respect to our joint venture investments; and (viii) it may be difficult for us to exit a joint venture if an impasse arises or if we desire to sell our interest for any reason. Any of the foregoing risks could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, we may, in certain circumstances, be liable for the actions of our joint venture partners.
The contractual arrangements we have with our consolidated variable interest entities (“VIEs”) is not as secure as direct ownership of such entities.
We have, and may in the future, enter into financing arrangements with certain VIEs to provide funding for potential capital expenditures including, but not limited to, the construction of dispensaries and other facilities. Our existing VIEs are, and may in the future be, owned by certain of our employees or their affiliates. We may enter into management service agreements (“MSAs”) with these VIEs, which grant us the ability to make business operating decisions, manage and staff employees, determine product mix, and t direct allocation of cash. The MSA may also allow us to limit distributions from the entity.
We consolidate VIEs with the Company for financial reporting purposes. If we were to hold such entities directly, we would be able to exercise our rights as an equity holder directly to effect changes in the boards, managers or employees of those entities, which could affect changes at the management and operational level. In contrast, under our current contractual arrangements with these VIEs, we may not be able to directly change the members of the boards, managers or employees of these entities and would have to rely on the entities and the entities’ equity holders to perform their obligations in order to exercise our control over the entities. If any of these affiliated entities or their equity holders fail to perform their respective obligations under the contractual arrangements, we may have to incur substantial costs and expend additional resources to enforce such arrangements.
Risks Related to our Business and Operations - The Cannabis Industry
If we are unable to compete effectively with current and potential participants in the cannabis industry and the illicit and psychoactive hemp-based markets, or if competition with current and potential market participants results in pricing pressure on our products, our business, financial condition and results of operations will be adversely impacted.
The U.S. cannabis industry is, and is expected to continue to be, competitive. A number of other companies engage in, and may in the future engage in, cannabis-related businesses, operate businesses in competition with us, purchase businesses and assets and/or make investments that we will also seek to purchase or make. This competition may increase the price we must pay for acquisitions, make it more difficult for us to acquire licenses and purchase additional businesses and assets and put pricing pressure on our products, making it more difficult to operate at a profit. The inability to operate at a profit and acquire licenses, businesses and assets on terms favorable to us may adversely impact the revenue stream, geographic footprint and growth that we anticipate achieving.
Large conglomerates and companies who also recognize the potential for financial success through acquisitions and investment in the cannabis industry could strategically purchase or assume control of dispensaries and cultivation and production facilities in the states in which we operate or plan to operate. In doing so, these larger competitors could establish price setting and cost controls which would effectively “price out” many of the participants in the varied businesses operating in the cannabis industry. While the trend in most state laws and regulations seemingly deters this type of takeover, the industry in the U.S. is young and the future regulatory landscapes at both the state and federal level remain largely unknown.
We also face competition from the psychoactive hemp-based market and the illicit market, along with illegal dispensaries and cultivation operations that are unlicensed and unregulated, and that are selling cannabis products, including products with higher concentrations of active ingredients, and using delivery methods that we may be prohibited from offering due to laws and regulations. Any inability or unwillingness by law enforcement authorities to enforce existing laws prohibiting the unlicensed production and sale of cannabis and cannabis products could result in increased competition for us. Any or all these events could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Synthetic products may compete with cannabis and cannabis products resulting in increased competition and downward pressure on demand, volume and the profitability of our products, which could adversely affect our business, financial conditions and results of operations.
The pharmaceutical industry may attempt to compete with or dominate the cannabis industry through the development and distribution of synthetic products that emulate the effects and treatment of organic cannabis. If they are successful, the widespread popularity of such synthetic products could change the demand, volume and profitability of cannabis and cannabis related products. This competition could adversely affect our ability to secure long-term profitability and success through sustainable and profitable operations and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We face risks due to industry immaturity and limited comparable, competitive or established industry best practices.
As a relatively new industry, there are not many established operators in the cannabis industry with business models we can follow or build upon. Similarly, there is limited information about comparable companies available to industry participants and potential investors to review in making business and investment decisions.
Shareholders and investors should consider, among other factors, our prospects for success in light of the risks and uncertainties encountered by companies like us. For example, unanticipated expenses and problems or technical difficulties may occur, which may result in material delays in the expansion or operation of our business. We may fail to successfully address these risks and uncertainties or fail to successfully implement our operating strategies. If we fail to do so, it could materially harm our business to the point of having to cease operations and could impair the value of the Subordinate Voting Shares such that investors may lose their entire investments.
We rely on third-party suppliers, manufacturers and contractors based in the U.S., and any significant interruption or negative change in the quality, availability, trade policy, pricing and other economics of these relationships could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
The cultivation, extraction, production, sale and distribution of cannabis and cannabis products is dependent on a number of key inputs from third-party suppliers based in the U.S. and their related costs, including raw materials, electricity, water and other local utilities. Many of these inputs are provided by local suppliers, manufacturers and contractors operating in the same state or U.S. region as our operations, especially with respect to energy sources and other utilities. Some of these inputs may only be available from a single supplier or a limited group of suppliers. If a sole source supplier were to go out of business, fail to ship products in a timely manner, fail to produce products that meet our quality standards, have limited supply, become unwilling to do business with a cannabis business or substantially raise its prices, we might be unable to find a replacement for such source locally, regionally or anywhere within the U.S. in a cost-effective or timely manner or at all, which could materially and adversely impact our reputation and operations. Further, the rates charged for electricity and other energy sources may increase due to diminished supply, general economic conditions, rising inflation or general economic recessions, and the cost of raw materials and other components, natural gas and electricity may be adversely affected by geopolitical disruptions, such as ongoing conflicts between Russia and Ukraine and Israel and Hamas, changes in trade policies, including the imposition of new tariffs or increases in existing tariffs between the United States, Mexico, Canada, China or other countries, or reactionary measures including retaliatory tariffs, legal challenges, or currency manipulation, climate change and harvesting conditions. If our suppliers were to increase costs for any reason, we may need to increase costs to our end consumers, which may not be successful in offsetting cost pressures. Consumers may be less willing to pay a price differential for our branded products and may increasingly purchase lower-priced offerings from us or our competitors, or may forego some purchases altogether, particularly of our premium products, during an economic downturn or times of increased inflationary pressure.
We also rely on relationships with numerous business partners and third-party service providers located in the U.S and in Canada. Unless and until the U.S. federal legal landscape with respect cannabis changes, there is a significant risk that U.S. business partners and third party service providers may be required or otherwise decide to suspend, limit or withdraw services and business relationships to avoid prosecution by federal authorities under U.S. federal laws. Any inability to secure partners and required services or to do so on appropriate terms could have a material adverse effect on our business plans, financial condition and results of operations.
A drop in the wholesale or retail price of cannabis products in the geographic areas in which we operate would negatively impact our business, financial condition and results of operations.
The price and demand for our products is determined on a state-by-state basis and depends in part on the price and supply of commercially-grown cannabis in the particular state. Fluctuations in economic and market conditions and changes in regulations that impact the prices and supply of commercially grown cannabis, such as increases in the supply of cannabis and the decrease in the price of products using commercially grown cannabis, could cause increased competition and restrictions on selling products, resulting in our revenues and profitability declining, which would have a negative impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Inconsistent public opinion and perception of the medical and adult use cannabis industry may hinder market growth and state adoption of cannabis, which would adversely impact our growth plans and current operations and result in an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Public opinion and support for medical and adult use cannabis has traditionally been inconsistent and varies from state to state. While public opinion and support appears to be rising generally in the U.S. for legalizing medical and adult use cannabis, it remains an issue subject to differing opinions surrounding the level of legalization (for example, medical cannabis only as opposed to legalization in general). Inconsistent public opinion and perception of medical and adult use cannabis hinders the growth of the cannabis industry and state adoption, which could have a material adverse effect on our business plans, financial condition and results of operations.
Our dependence upon consumer perceptions means that adverse scientific research reports, findings, regulatory proceedings, litigation, media attention or other publicity, regardless of accuracy or merit, could have a material adverse effect on us. Further, adverse publicity reports or other media attention regarding the safety, efficacy and quality of cannabis generally, or our products specifically, or associating the consumption of cannabis with illness or other negative effects or events, could have a material adverse effect on our sales and profits. Adverse publicity reports or other media attention could arise even if the adverse effects associated with such products resulted from consumers’ failure to consume the products appropriately or as directed.
The cannabis industry is subject to the risks inherent in an agricultural business, including environmental factors and the risk of crop failure. These risks could negatively impact our business, financial condition and results of operations.
The growing of cannabis is an agricultural process. As such, we are subject to the risks inherent in an agricultural business, including risks of climate change, crop failure and destruction presented by water scarcity, power failure, fires, insects, plant diseases and similar agricultural risks. These factors could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We may be adversely impacted by rising or volatile energy costs and available supply.
Cannabis cultivation and processing consumes considerable energy, which makes us vulnerable to rising energy costs and available supply, including the price and availability of oil and natural gas. Accordingly, recent rising or volatile energy costs and supply disruptions caused by global supply constraints, inflation, limits on U.S. production and sanctions imposed on Russian imports may adversely impact our business operations, financial condition and results of operations.
We face physical security risks. Any theft or other security event could lead to human injury and financial losses that would negatively affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. If a security breach resulted in substantial cannabis diversion, we could become a target for federal cannabis enforcement.
The business premises and assets of our operating locations are targets for theft. While we have implemented security measures at each of our locations and continue to monitor and seek to improve our security measures, our cultivation, production and dispensary facilities could be subject to break-ins, robberies and other breaches in security. If there was a breach in security and we fell victim to a robbery or theft, our employees or customers could be harmed and the loss of cannabis products, cultivation and production equipment or cash may be uninsured or underinsured, all of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Furthermore, if such losses resulted in cannabis diversion, especially diversion to minors or across state lines, we could become a target for federal enforcement action, which could lead to criminal or civil sanctions that would materially impact our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Risks Related to our Business and Operations - United States and Canadian Regulation of Cannabis
As a British Columbia corporation with cannabis-related business activities, the Company may be subject to heightened scrutiny by Canadian authorities, which could negatively affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
The business, operations and investments of the Company in the U.S., and any future businesses, operations and investments, may become the subject of heightened scrutiny by regulators, stock exchanges and other authorities in Canada. As a result, we may be subject to significant direct and indirect interaction with Canadian public officials. There can be no assurance that this heightened scrutiny will not in turn lead to the imposition of restrictions on our ability to invest or hold interests in other entities in the U.S. or any other jurisdiction.
The Canadian Securities Administrators’ Staff Notice 51-352 describes the Canadian Securities Administrators’ disclosure expectations for specific risks facing issuers with cannabis-related activities in the U.S. Staff Notice 51-352 confirms that a disclosure-based approach remains appropriate for Canadian issuers with U.S. cannabis-related activities, and includes additional disclosure expectations that apply to all Canadian issuers with U.S. cannabis-related activities, including those with direct and indirect involvement in the cultivation and distribution of cannabis, as well as Canadian issuers that provide goods and services to third parties involved in the U.S. cannabis industry.
The Canadian Depository for Securities Ltd. (“CDS”) is Canada’s central securities depository, clearing and settling trades in the Canadian equity, fixed income and money markets. CDS has signed a Memorandum of Understanding (the “TSX MOU”) with Aequitas NEO Exchange Inc. (now CBOE Canada Inc.), the CSE and the Toronto Stock Exchange confirming that it relies on such exchanges to review the conduct of listed issuers. Pursuant to the TSX MOU, CDS currently will not ban accepting deposits of or transactions for clearing and settlement of securities of Canadian issuers with cannabis-related activities in the U.S.
However, there can be no guarantee that the settlement of such securities will continue in the future. If CDS were to implement a ban, it would have a material adverse effect on the ability of holders of Subordinate Voting Shares to make and settle trades. In particular, the Subordinate Voting Shares would become highly illiquid until an alternative was implemented, and our shareholders would have no ability to effect a trade of the Subordinate Voting Shares through the facilities of a Canadian stock exchange.
Disparate state-by-state regulatory landscapes and the constraints related to holding cannabis licenses in various states results in operational and legal structures that could have materially detrimental consequences to our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We realize, and will continue to realize, the benefits from cannabis licenses pursuant to several different operational and legal structures, depending on the regulatory requirements for specific states, including realizing the economic benefit of cannabis licenses through Management Agreements, which are often with third parties who hold the cannabis license. Management Agreements may be required to comply with applicable state laws and regulations or are in response to perceived risks that we determine warrants such arrangements.
The foregoing structures present various risks to us, including the following risks, each of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations:
•A regulatory authority may determine that these Management Agreement structures are in violation of an existing legal or regulatory requirement or it may change the legal or regulatory requirements such that this contractual structure violates such changed requirements. We cannot provide assurance that a license application submitted by a third party for operations that would be governed by a Management Agreement will be approved or renewed.
•There could be a material and adverse impact on the revenue stream we intend to receive from a Management Agreement structure. If a Management Agreement is terminated, we will no longer receive any economic benefit from the applicable dispensary or cultivation license previously subject to the Management Agreement.
•These structures could potentially result in the funds invested by us for the development and operation of the business subject to the applicable license being used for unintended purposes, such as to fund litigation or damages from a contractual breach by the license holder.
•Under a Management Agreement structure, we will not be the holder of the applicable cannabis license, and therefore, we only would have contractual rights with respect to any interest in any such license. If the license holder fails to adhere to its contractual agreement with the us, or if the license holder makes, or fails to make, decisions in respect of the license that we disagree with, we will only have contractual recourse and will not have recourse to any regulatory authority.
•The license holder may renege on its obligation to pay fees and other compensation pursuant to a Management Agreement or violate other provisions of these agreements.
•The license holder’s acts or omissions may violate the applicable license, thus jeopardizing the status and economic value of the license holder and, by extension, us.
•The license holder may attempt to terminate the Management Agreement with us in violation of its express terms.
In any or all of the above situations, it would be difficult and expensive for us to protect our rights through litigation, arbitration or similar proceedings.
Our business is subject to a variety of laws regarding financial transactions related to cannabis, which could subject us to legal claims or otherwise adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations.
We are subject to a variety of laws and regulations that prohibit money laundering, including the Money Laundering Control Act and any related or similar rules, regulations or guidelines issued, administered or enforced by governmental authorities in the U.S. or any other jurisdiction in which we have business operations. Financial institutions in the U.S. that we rely on are subject to the Bank Secrecy Act. The penalties for violation of these laws include imprisonment, substantial fines and forfeiture.
In 2014, the DOJ directed federal prosecutors to exercise restraint in prosecuting money laundering violations arising in the state legal cannabis programs and to consider the federal enforcement priorities enumerated in the Cole Memorandum when determining whether to charge institutions or individuals based upon cannabis-related activity. In the same year, the Treasury Department issued guidance that clarified how financial institutions can provide services to cannabis-related businesses, consistent with financial institutions’ obligations under the Bank Secrecy Act. Then Attorney General Sessions’ rescission of the DOJ’s guidance on the state cannabis programs increased uncertainty and heightened the risk that U.S. federal law enforcement authorities could seek to pursue money laundering charges against entities or individuals, engaged in supporting the U.S. cannabis industry. In January 2018, the Treasury Department issued additional guidance that the 2014 guidance would remain in place until further notice, despite the rescission of the DOJ’s earlier guidance memoranda. While proposed legislation such as the SAFE Banking Act, SAFER Banking Act and the CLIMB Act may make it easier for cannabis companies to access U.S. financial institutions, there is no guarantee that these acts will pass in the near future or at all, or that they will not significantly change prior to passing.
If any of our business activities, any dividends or distributions therefrom, or any profits or revenue accruing thereby are found to be in violation of money laundering statutes, we could be subject to criminal liability and significant penalties and fines. Any violations of these laws, or allegations of violations could disrupt our operations and involve significant management distraction and expenses. As a result, money laundering charges could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. Additionally, proceeds from our business activities could be subject to seizure or forfeiture if they are found to be illegal proceeds of a crime transmitted in violation of anti-money laundering laws, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
THE CONSEQUENCES OF SUCH GOVERNMENTAL ENFORCEMENT WOULD BE MATERIALLY DETRIMENTAL TO US, OUR BUSINESS AND THE VALUE OF THE SUBORDINATE VOTING SHARES AND COULD RESULT IN THE FORFEITURE OR SEIZURE OF ALL OR SUBSTANTIALLY ALL OF THE COMPANY’S ASSETS.
Compliance with regulations regarding cannabis is difficult and costly because the regulation of cannabis differs by jurisdiction, is uncertain and frequently changes. Compliance with applicable regulatory laws may be costly and take an extended period of time which may adversely affect our business, financial condition and financial results. If we fail to comply with applicable laws regarding cannabis, our business, financial condition and results of operations may be adversely affected.
Achievement of our business objectives is contingent, in part, upon our compliance with regulatory requirements enacted by governmental authorities and obtaining all regulatory approvals, where necessary, for the operation of our business and the sale of our products. We cannot predict the impact of the compliance regime regulatory bodies in the U.S. and Canada are implementing or may implement that may affect our business. Similarly, we cannot predict the cost and time that will be required to secure or renew all appropriate regulatory licenses and approvals for the operation of our business or the sale of our products, or the cost and extent of testing, tracking, documentation, reporting and other compliance requirements that may be required by governmental authorities. The impact of governmental compliance regimes, the cost in obtaining and maintaining regulatory approvals and any delays in obtaining, or failure to obtain regulatory approvals may significantly delay or impact existing markets and the development of new markets, products and sales initiatives and could have a material adverse effect on our business plans, results of operations and financial condition.
Recent and proposed state legislation throughout the U.S. has prioritized minority and diversity participation in the cannabis industry, including providing licensing preferences to minority owners, individuals with specified criminal convictions, local residents and individuals and businesses from economically depressed or disadvantaged areas. Social equity state legislation could prevent, limit or discourage us from obtaining new licenses, renewing licenses or participating in new or existing markets, which would have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Recent and proposed state legislation throughout the U.S. has prioritized minority and diversity participation in the cannabis industry, including providing licensing preferences to minority owners, individuals with specified criminal convictions, local residents and individuals and businesses from economically depressed or disadvantaged areas. As new medical and adult use legislation is passed, multi-state operators such as us may be prevented, limited or discouraged from obtaining new licenses, renewing licenses or from participating in new markets or existing markets, or may be required to partner with specific individuals, who may be difficult to find and agree to terms with. Social equity initiatives could adversely impact our ability to increase or maintain market share and revenues in certain states, expand our geographic footprint or obtain a positive return on our acquisitions or investments, all of which could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations. However, on January 20, 2025, President Trump issued an executive order ending certain federal diversity, equity and inclusion programs. As such, we are uncertain whether the programs discussed above will continue in the cannabis industry.
There is a risk of high bonding and insurance costs which could materially impact our business, financial condition and results of operations.
There is risk that some or all state and local regulatory agencies will require entities and individuals engaged in aspects of the cannabis business to post a bond and maintain specified levels of insurance when applying for a cannabis-related license or renewal as a guarantee of payment of sales and franchise tax. It remains an unknown cost that could have a negative impact on our ultimate success or our participation in the business opportunities ultimately selected.
Unknown additional or increased regulatory fees, required fundings and taxes may be assessed in the future, which could materially impact our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Various states and localities have imposed (or may in the future impose) licensing and other fees to fund, among other things, schools, road improvements, low-income and moderate-income housing and financing for social equity operators. Additionally, multiple states in the U.S. are considering, or may in the future consider, special taxes, funding requirements or increasing or adding fees on businesses in the cannabis industry, including substantial licensing fees. The imposition of additional taxes, required fundings or increased fees would adversely affect our operating results and expected returns on acquisitions, investments and business opportunities.
We are subject to environmental regulations, and future changes in environmental regulations could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our operations are subject to environmental regulations in the various jurisdictions in which we operate. These regulations mandate, among other things, the maintenance of air and water quality standards, emissions standards and land reclamation. They also set forth limitations on the generation, transportation, storage and disposal of solid and hazardous waste. Environmental legislation is evolving in a manner which will require stricter standards and enforcement, increased compliance costs, increased fines and penalties for non-compliance, more stringent environmental assessments of proposed projects, and a heightened degree of responsibility for companies and their officers, directors and employees. There is no assurance that future changes in environmental regulation will not have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Our operating results may be adversely affected by changes in laws and policies governing employers and by union organizing activity.
Congress and certain state legislatures continue to consider and pass legislation that increases our costs of doing business, including increased minimum wages and requiring employers to provide paid sick leave or paid family leave. In addition, our employee-related operating costs may be increased by union organizing activity and the National Labor Relations Board adopted regulatory changes that could facilitate union organizing. If we are unable to reflect these increased expenses in our pricing or otherwise modify our operations to mitigate the effects of such increases, our operating results will be adversely affected.
We may be required by regulatory authorities to divest licenses, which would adversely impact our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Some states in which we operate, or expect to operate, limit or may in the future limit, the number of licenses that can be held by one consolidated entity within that state. We may hold more than the prescribed number of licenses in a state, including after consummating an acquisition of a business that also holds licenses in the applicable state, and accordingly we may be required to divest licenses and related operations in order to comply with applicable regulations or in order to receive approval to consummate such acquisition. The required divestiture of licenses and related operations may result in us accepting sales prices below market value and the incurrence of divestiture costs and disruptions which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We are dependent on the banking industry, and we have difficulty accessing or consistently maintaining banking or other financial services due to the federal illegality of cannabis businesses, which could adversely impact our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our participation in the cannabis industry limits our ability to do business or establish collaborative relationships with U.S. financial institutions that may fear disruption or increased regulatory scrutiny of their own activities.
We are dependent on the banking industry. Our business operating functions, including payroll for employees, equipment and property lease payments, and the payment of other vendor and operating expenses, are reliant on having access to traditional banking services. We require access to banking services to make and receive payments in a timely manner, and these could be jeopardized if we lose access to bank accounts. Most federal and federally insured banks currently do not serve cannabis businesses on the stated ground that growing and selling cannabis is illegal under federal law, even though the Treasury Department issued guidelines to banks in February 2014 that clarified how financial institutions can provide services to cannabis-related businesses, consistent with financial institutions’ obligations under the Bank Secrecy Act. When cannabis businesses are able to find a bank that will provide services, they face extensive customer due diligence in light of complex state regulatory requirements and guidance from the Treasury Department, and these reviews are time-consuming and costly, creating additional barriers to financial services for, and imposing additional compliance requirements on, us. While the U.S. federal government has generally not initiated financial crime prosecutions against state-law compliant cannabis companies or their vendors, the U.S. federal government theoretically could initiate such prosecutions, at least against companies in the adult use cannabis markets. The continued uncertainty surrounding financial transactions related to cannabis activities, including legislation such as the SAFE Banking Act, the SAFER Banking Act and the CLIMB Act, and the subsequent risks this uncertainty presents to U.S. financial institutions may result in their discontinuing services to the cannabis industry or limiting their ability to provide services to the cannabis industry or ancillary businesses providing services to the cannabis industry.
We, our directors, officers, investors and other stakeholders may be required to disclose personal information to regulatory authorities. Failing to do so could put our licenses in jeopardy and negatively impact our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We own, operate, manage, and provide products or services to various U.S. state-licensed cannabis businesses. Acquiring even a minimal or indirect interest in a U.S. state-licensed cannabis business can trigger requirements to disclose directors’, officers’, investors’ and other stakeholders’ personal information to applicable regulatory authorities. While these requirements vary by jurisdiction, some require interest holders to personally apply for regulatory approval and to provide tax returns, compensation agreements, fingerprints for background checks, criminal history records and other personal documents and information. Some states require disclosures of directors, officers and holders of more than a specified percentage of equity of the applicant. While some states allow exceptions for investments in publicly traded companies like us, not all states do so, and some of these public company exceptions are limited to companies traded on a U.S. stock exchange, which we are not. If these regulations apply to us, our directors, investors, officers and other stakeholders are required to comply with the regulations or face the possibility that our relevant cannabis license could be revoked or cancelled by the state licensing authority.
If one of our shareholders is found unsuitable by one of our licensing authorities, we may seek to redeem such shareholder’s ownership interests and we may be forced to use our cash or incur debt to fund such redemption of our securities. If we are unable to redeem our securities, such failure could result in the loss of current or potential cannabis licenses which would have an adverse effect on our revenues, financial performance and growth objectives.
We may seek to redeem our securities held by certain shareholders in the event (i) a licensing authority has determined that the shareholder is unsuitable to own securities of a cannabis licensee, or (ii) we have determined that the shareholder’s ownership of our securities may result in the loss, suspension or revocation (or similar action) with respect to our cannabis licenses or in us being unable to obtain any new cannabis licenses, in each case including as a result of the evaluation of such person’s suitability review or such person otherwise failing to comply with the requirements of a licensing authority. Any redemption and the price of such redemption would be determined by our board of directors (the “Board”) and, if a license application has been filed, after consultation with the applicable licensing authority. Any redemption may be required to be made at a premium to the market value of such securities, and a redemption diverts our cash resources from other productive uses and may require us to obtain additional financing which may involve additional restrictive covenants and further leveraging of our assets. In the event we seek to redeem specified securities and are unable to do so, such failure may result in the loss of one or more current or potential cannabis licenses which would have an adverse effect on our revenues, financial performance, growth objectives and geographic diversity.
Our directors, officers, employees and investors may be subject to the risk of being barred from entry into the U.S. If our investors or personnel are barred from entering the United States, it could negatively impact our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Because cannabis remains illegal under U.S. federal law, non-U.S. citizens employed at or investing in U.S. state licensed cannabis businesses could face detention, denial of entry or lifetime bans from the U.S. for their associations with U.S. cannabis businesses. Entry happens at the sole discretion of the officers on duty of the U.S. Customs and Border Protection (“U.S. Customs”), and these officers have wide latitude to ask questions to determine the admissibility of a foreign national. The government of Canada has posted on its website that previous use of cannabis, or any substance prohibited by U.S. federal laws, could mean denial of entry into the U.S. Business or financial involvement in the legal cannabis industry in Canada or in the U.S. could also be reason enough for U.S. border guards to deny entry. On September 21, 2018, U.S. Customs released a statement outlining its current position with respect to enforcement of U.S. laws. It stated that Canada’s legalization of cannabis will not change U.S. Customs enforcement of U.S. federal laws regarding controlled substances and, because cannabis continues to be a controlled substance under U.S. federal law, working in or facilitating the proliferation of the cannabis industry in U.S. states where it is deemed legal, or in Canada, may affect admissibility into the U.S. As a result, U.S. Customs has affirmed that employees, directors, officers, managers and investors of businesses involved in activities related to cannabis in the U.S. or Canada who are not U.S. citizens face the risk of being barred from entry into the U.S. for life. On October 9, 2018, U.S. Customs released an additional statement regarding the admissibility of Canadian citizens working in the legal cannabis industry. U.S. Customs stated that a Canadian citizen working in or facilitating the proliferation of the legal cannabis industry in Canada coming into the U.S. for reasons unrelated to the cannabis industry will generally be admitted into the U.S.; however, if such person is found to be coming into the U.S. for reasons related to the cannabis industry, such person may be deemed inadmissible.
Applicable state laws may prevent us from maximizing our potential income, including by restricting our sales and marketing activities. If our profits are constrained by such regulations, it could negatively impact our business, financial condition and results of operations.
The development of our business and operating results may be hindered by applicable restrictions on sales and marketing activities imposed by government regulatory bodies. The cannabis regulatory environment in the U.S. limits our ability to grow sales among existing customers and reach new customers in a manner similar to other industries. If we are unable to effectively market our products and compete for market share, or if the costs of compliance with government legislation and regulation cannot be absorbed through increased prices for our products, our sales and operating results could be adversely affected.
Cannabis may become subject to increased regulation by the FDA or the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (the “ATF”). If we are unable to comply with applicable regulations, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
At this time, cannabis remains a Schedule I controlled substance under U.S. federal law. In October 2022, President Biden announced that he was asking the Secretary of HHS and the Attorney General to review the scheduling of cannabis under federal law. In August 2023, HHS recommended to the DEA that cannabis be rescheduled from Schedule I to Schedule III under the CSA. In May 2024, the DEA announced that it was submitting a notice of a proposed rulemaking to the Federal Register, and hearings for the formal rulemaking process began in December 2024. On December 2, 2024, the DEA held a preliminary formal hearing regarding the rescheduling of cannabis, and additional hearings were scheduled from January 21, 2025 to March 6, 2025. On January 13, 2025, Chief Administrative Law Judge presiding over the rescheduling of cannabis ordered that the hearing scheduled for January 21, 2025 was cancelled, and that the proceedings in the matter were stayed, pending a resolution of an interlocutory appeal to the DEA Administrator. A joint status update must be provided to the tribunal ninety (90) days from the issuance of the order, and every ninety (90) days thereafter.
Additionally, the FDA may issue rules and regulations, including good manufacturing practices, related to the growth, cultivation, harvesting and processing of cannabis. Clinical trials may be needed to verify the efficacy and safety of cannabis products. It is also possible that the FDA would require facilities that grow medical-use cannabis to register with the FDA and comply with federally prescribed regulations. In the event that some or all of these regulations are imposed, the impact on the cannabis industry is unknown, including what costs, requirements and possible prohibitions may be enforced. If we become subject to these enhanced regulations prescribed by the FDA and are unable to comply, it may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
It is also possible that the federal government could seek to regulate cannabis under the ATF. The ATF may issue rules and regulations related to the use, transporting, sale and advertising of cannabis or cannabis products, including smokeless cannabis products.
Because cannabis is illegal at the U.S. federal level, we may be unable to enforce our contracts, which could negatively impact our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Judges in multiple U.S. states have on several occasions refused to enforce contracts for the repayment of money when the loan was used in connection with activities that violate federal law, even if there is no violation of state law. Therefore, there is uncertainty that we will be able to legally enforce our agreements through U.S. legal proceedings because cannabis is illegal at the U.S. federal level.
Because states may not allow or enforce the pledge of cannabis assets as collateral, we may not be able to obtain financing or obtain better terms of financing on a secured basis or enforce any liens we may be granted on the inventory or licenses of third parties that secure our payment and other rights.
In general, the laws of the states that have legalized the sale and cultivation of cannabis do not expressly or impliedly allow for the pledge of cannabis inventory as collateral for the benefit of third parties that do not possess the requisite licenses and entitlements to cultivate, sell or possess cannabis pursuant to the applicable state law. Likewise, the laws of those states generally do not allow for the transfer of licenses and entitlements to sell or produce cannabis products to third parties that were not directly granted such licenses and entitlements by the applicable state agency. The inability to enforce liens on cannabis inventory and licenses that secure the payment of debt and other contractual rights increases the risk of loss resulting from breaches of the applicable agreements by the contracting parties, which, in turn, could have a material adverse effect on our ability to obtain secured financing, or obtain better terms on financing, or secure any loans or advances we make to third parties in the cannabis industry.
Because cannabis is illegal under U.S. federal law, we may lack access to U.S. bankruptcy protections, which could negatively impact our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Because the use of cannabis is illegal under U.S. federal law, certain U.S. federal courts have denied cannabis businesses bankruptcy protections, thus making it difficult for lenders and investors to quantify the risk of being able to recoup their investments in the cannabis industry in the event of an insolvency. If we were to become insolvent, there is no guarantee that U.S. federal bankruptcy protections would be available, the unavailability of which would have a material adverse effect on any restructuring transaction.
Additionally, there is no guarantee that we will be able to effectively enforce any interests we may have in our subsidiaries, affiliates and investments. A bankruptcy or other similar insolvency event of an entity in which we hold an interest that precludes such entity from performing its obligations owed to us under an agreement may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Further, should an entity in which we hold an interest have insufficient assets to pay its liabilities, it is possible that other liabilities will be satisfied prior to the liabilities or equity owed to us. In addition, bankruptcy or other similar insolvency proceedings are often a complex and lengthy process, the outcome of which may be uncertain and could result in a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Also, some state cannabis laws preclude entities which become insolvent from holding medical or adult use cannabis licenses. Any insolvency proceedings by the Company could therefore put the operations of our subsidiaries or affiliates at risk, which would have a negative impact on theirs and our consolidated business, financial condition and results of operations.
Risks Related to our Business and Operations - Information Technology, Cybersecurity and Intellectual Property
We are subject to risks related to our information technology systems, including cyber-security risks. Successful cyber-attacks or technological malfunctions can result in, among other things, financial losses, the inability to process transactions, the unauthorized release of confidential information and reputational risk, all which would negatively impact our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our use of technology is critical to our continued operations. We are susceptible to operational, financial and information security risks resulting from cyber-attacks or technological malfunctions. Successful cyber-attacks or technological malfunctions affecting us or our respective service providers can result in, among other things, financial losses, the inability to process transactions, the unauthorized release of customer information or other confidential information and reputational risk. Depending on the severity of a potential cybersecurity incident, our customers’ data, our employees’ data, our intellectual property (including trade secrets and research and development), and other third-party data (such as suppliers and vendors) could be compromised, which could adversely affect our business. As cybersecurity threats continue to evolve, we may be required to use additional resources to continue to modify or enhance protective measures or to investigate security vulnerabilities, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
In connection with our products and services, we may receive, process, store and transmit sensitive business information and, in certain circumstances, personal medical and other information. To the extent that any disruption or security breach were to result in a loss of, or damage to, our data, including any personal information, we could incur liability and reputational damage and could be subject to civil fines and penalties, including under the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1966 (“HIPAA”), and other relevant state and federal privacy laws in the U.S.
We rely on third-parties to provide numerous capabilities that we depend upon on to operate, and a disruption of these systems could adversely affect our business.
We are dependent on vendors and third-party software providers, such as our seed-to-sale tracking software providers and point of sale transaction processing providers to operate our business. A serious disruption to any of these could significantly limit our ability to serve our customers and operate profitably. The failure of one or more such providers to provide the expected services, provide them on a timely basis or provide them at the prices we expect, or otherwise meet our performance standards and expectations (including with respect to data security, compliance and data privacy and protection laws) may adversely affect our business. Further, if we found it necessary to replace any such service provider, disruptions arising from the transition of functions to an alternative provider, or the costs developing our own software if we were unable to find an alternate provider, may have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or financial condition. Any disruption could cause our business and competitive position to suffer and cause our operating results to be reduced.
Strong brand identities are important to our success, and we may have to incur significant expenses to maintain our brand identities. If we are unable to protect our brands or if the cost is excessive, it could negatively affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We believe that establishing and maintaining the brand identities of our national retail chain and products are critical aspects of attracting, expanding and keeping a large customer base. Promotion and enhancement of brands will depend largely on our success in operating our dispensaries and providing high-quality products. If customers and patients do not perceive our retail operations and products to be consistently of high quality and value, or if we introduce new products, change products or enter into new business ventures that are not favorably received by customers and patients, we risk diluting our brand identities and decreasing their attractiveness to existing and potential customers. Moreover, in order to attract and retain customers and to promote and maintain brand equity in response to competitive pressures, we may have to substantially increase our financial commitment to creating and maintaining distinct brand loyalty among customers. We may incur significant expenses in an attempt to promote and maintain our brands, and if such efforts are not successful it could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We are reliant on intellectual property rights. If we fail to protect our intellectual property it could negatively affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our success will depend in part on our ability to use and develop new extraction technologies, recipes, formulations, know-how and novel cannabis genetics. We may be vulnerable to competitors who develop competing technology, whether independently or as a result of acquiring access to the proprietary products and trade secrets of acquired businesses. In addition, effective future patent, copyright and trade secret protection may be diminished or limited based on significant innovation and advances within the market. If we fail to adequately maintain and enhance protection over our proprietary techniques and processes, as well as over our unregistered intellectual property, including our policies, procedures and training manuals, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
There is limited trademark protection for cannabis products. If we are unable to protect our trademarks, it could negatively affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Because producing, manufacturing, processing, possessing, distributing, selling and using cannabis is illegal under the Controlled Substances Act, the United States Patent and Trademark Office will not permit the registration of any trademark that identifies cannabis products. As a result, we likely will be unable to protect our cannabis related trademarks beyond the geographic areas in which we conduct business. The use of our trademarks outside the states in which we operate by one or more other persons could have a material adverse effect on the value of our trademarks and as a result, on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our trade secrets may be difficult to protect. Our failure to maintain meaningful trade secret protection could adversely affect our competitive position and our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our success depends upon the skills, knowledge, and experience of our scientific and technical personnel, our consultants and advisors, as well as our contractors. Because we operate in a highly competitive industry, we rely in part on trade secrets to protect our proprietary technologies and processes. However, trade secrets are difficult and costly to protect. We enter into business protection, confidentiality and non-disclosure agreements with our partners, employees, consultants, outside scientific collaborators, developers and other advisors. These agreements generally require that the receiving party will keep confidential and not disclose to third parties our confidential information developed by the receiving party or made known to the receiving party by us during the course of the receiving party’s relationship with us. These agreements also generally provide that inventions conceived by the receiving party in the course of rendering services to us will be our exclusive property. In addition, we enter into assignment agreements to further perfect our rights in our intellectual property, including trade secrets, inventions, work product and confidential information.
These confidentiality, inventions, assignment and business protection agreements may be breached and may not effectively assign intellectual property rights to us. Our trade secrets also could be independently discovered or reverse engineered by competitors, in which case we would not be able to prevent the use of such trade secrets by our competitors. The enforcement of a claim alleging that a party illegally obtained and was using our trade secrets could be difficult, expensive and time consuming and the outcome would be unpredictable. In addition, courts may be less willing to protect trade secrets related to cannabis activities. The failure to obtain or maintain meaningful trade secret protection could adversely affect our competitive position.
We may be exposed to infringement or misappropriation claims by third parties, which, if determined adversely to us, could subject us to significant liabilities and other costs, negatively impacting our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our success will depend in part on our ability to use and develop new extraction technologies, recipes, know-how and new strains of cannabis without infringing the intellectual property rights of third parties. We cannot assure that third parties will not assert intellectual property claims against us or companies we acquire. We are subject to additional risks if entities licensing intellectual property to us do not have adequate rights in the licensed materials. If third parties assert trademark, copyright or patent infringement or violation of other intellectual property rights against us or companies we acquire, we will be required to defend ourselves in litigation or administrative proceedings, which can be both costly and time consuming and may significantly divert the efforts and resources of our personnel. An adverse determination in any such litigation or proceeding to which we may become a party could subject us to significant liability to third parties, require us to seek licenses from third parties or pay ongoing royalties or subject us to injunctions prohibiting the development and operation of our applications.
Our business may be adversely affected by an increasing prevalence of fraud and other financial crimes.
We are susceptible to fraudulent activity that may be committed against us or our customers which may result in financial losses or increased costs to us or our customers, disclosure or misuse of our information or our customers' information, misappropriation of assets, privacy breaches against our customers, litigation or damage to our reputation. Such fraudulent activity may take many forms, including check fraud, electronic fraud, wire fraud, phishing, social engineering and other dishonest acts. Nationally, reported incidents of fraud and other financial crimes have increased year-over-year. We have also experienced losses due to apparent fraud and other financial crimes. While we have policies and procedures designed to prevent such losses, there can be no assurance that such losses will not occur.
Risks Related to our Securities, Internal Controls and Governance
A return on our securities is not guaranteed.
There is no guarantee that our Subordinate Voting Shares will earn any positive return in the short or long term. A holding of Subordinate Voting Shares is speculative, involves a high degree of risk and should be undertaken only by holders whose financial resources are sufficient to enable them to assume such risks and who have no need for immediate liquidity in their investment. An investment in Subordinate Voting Shares is appropriate only for investors who have the capacity to absorb a loss of some or all of their investment.
The elimination of monetary liability against our directors and officers under British Columbia law and the existence of indemnification rights for our directors and officers may result in substantial expenditures by us and may discourage us from bringing claims for wrongful acts against our directors and officers, which could negatively impact our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our corporate articles contain a provision permitting the elimination of personal liability of our directors and officers to us and our shareholders for damages caused by a director or officer to the extent provided for under British Columbia law. We may also incur contractual indemnification obligations under employment agreements with our officers or agreements entered into with our directors. These indemnification obligations could result in us incurring substantial expenditures to cover the cost of settlement or damage awards against our directors and officers, which may be uninsured or underinsured and for which we may be unable to recoup. These agreements and the resulting costs may also discourage us from bringing a lawsuit against directors and officers for breaches of their fiduciary duties, and may similarly discourage the filing of derivative litigation by our shareholders against our directors and officers even though such actions, if successful, might otherwise benefit us and our shareholders.
Our capital structure may negatively impact the trading price of the Subordinate Voting Shares, which could adversely affect the trading volume and liquidity of the Subordinate Voting Shares and our ability to attract investors and raise funds through equity issuances.
Although many other Canadian companies have dual class or multiple class share structures and we currently do not have any Proportionate Voting Shares outstanding, our dual class capital structure, with each Proportionate Voting Shares being convertible into 100 Subordinate Voting Shares, could result in a lower trading price for, or greater fluctuations in, the trading price, volume and liquidity of the Subordinate Voting Shares. This could impair our ability to issue Subordinate Voting Shares as consideration in our acquisitions, raise additional capital through the sale of securities, attract investors and could have other adverse consequences.
The Company is a public issuer in both the U.S. and Canada. The Board and management must devote time and resources to compliance initiatives, corporate governance practices and securities rules and regulations that impose various requirements on both Canadian and U.S. public companies. These additional costs and management attention could negatively impact our business, financial condition and results of operations.
As a public issuer in Canada, the Company is subject to the reporting requirements and rules and regulations under Canadian securities laws and the rules of Cboe. As a public issuer in the U.S., the Company is also subject to the rules and regulations of the SEC and the reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Application of both existing or new U.S. or Canadian regulatory requirements may have adverse consequences on our ability to issue securities to acquire companies or to raise capital in private placements or prospectus offerings.
As a public company, there are costs associated with legal, accounting and other expenses related to regulatory compliance in Canada as well as compliance with the U.S. Securities legislation and the rules and policies of Canadian Securities Administrators, Cboe and the SEC require reporting and listed companies to, among other things, adopt corporate governance and related practices, and to continuously prepare and disclose material information, all of which add to a company’s legal and financial compliance costs. Complying with these U.S. and Canadian statutes, regulations and requirements, particularly now that we no longer qualify as an Emerging Growth Company under U.S. securities laws, occupies a significant amount of time of the Board and management.
Shareholder activism, the political environment and a high level of government intervention and regulatory reform may lead to substantial new regulations and disclosure obligations, which could then result in additional compliance costs and affect the manner in which we operate our business. We also devote greater resources than a non-reporting company otherwise would to communications and other activities involving shareholders, investors and analysts which are typically considered important for publicly traded companies. Any new regulations or disclosure obligations or additional shareholder communications and activities may increase our legal and financial compliance costs and may make some compliance activities more time-consuming and costly.
Our management must devote substantial time and cost to the establishment, modification and maintenance of effective internal controls required by Section 404(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“SOX”). These requirements take time and resources and increase our legal and financial compliance costs. If we are unable to maintain effective internal controls, our ability to produce timely and accurate financial statements could be impaired, investors could lose confidence in our financial information and the price of our Subordinate Voting Shares could decline.
As a U.S. and Canadian reporting company, we are required to maintain effective disclosure controls and procedures and internal controls over financial reporting. Our management is required to furnish a report on our internal controls over financial reporting in our Annual Reports on Form 10-K. In addition, our independent registered public accounting firm is required, pursuant to Section 404(b) of SOX, to attest to the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting and we are required to include such attestation in our Annual Reports on Form 10-K.
We have incurred significant costs related to maintaining our internal controls over financial reporting, and cannot predict or estimate the amount of time resources and additional costs we may incur or the impact and timing of such use of resources and costs. We may encounter problems or delays in implementing any changes necessary to make a favorable assessment of our internal controls over financial reporting.
Any testing by us conducted in connection with Section 404 of SOX, have in the past, and may in the future reveal deficiencies in our internal controls over financial reporting that are deemed to be material weaknesses that may require prospective or retrospective changes to our consolidated financial statements, or identify other areas for further attention or improvement. Inferior internal controls could impair our ability to produce timely and accurate financial statements and cause investors to lose confidence in our reported financial information, which could have a negative effect on the trading price of our Subordinate Voting Shares.
Despite the efforts we have undertaken, we have in the past concluded, and there is a risk in the future that we will not be able to conclude, within the prescribed time frame or at all, that our internal control over financial reporting is effective as required by Section 404 of SOX. If within the prescribed time frame, in the future we cannot favorably assess the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting, or if our independent registered public accounting firm is unable to provide an unqualified attestation report on our internal controls, investors could lose confidence in our financial information and the price of our Subordinate Voting Shares could decline.
Additional issuances of Subordinate Voting Shares and Proportionate Voting Shares, or securities convertible into such classes of shares, may result in voting and economic dilution to our shareholders.
We plan to issue additional securities in the future in connection with acquisitions, equity incentive plans, securities offerings and financing transactions (including through the sale of securities convertible into or exchangeable or exercisable for shares of our capital stock), which will dilute our shareholders’ holdings in the Company. Our corporate articles permit the issuance of an unlimited number of Subordinate Voting Shares and an unlimited number of Proportionate Voting Shares, and our shareholders have no pre-emptive rights in connection with any further issuances. The Board has discretion to determine the price and the terms of further issuances, and such terms could include rights, preferences, and privileges superior to those of our existing outstanding securities. We cannot predict the size or nature of future issuances or the effect that future issuances and sales of our securities will have on the market price of the Subordinate Voting Shares. Issuances of a substantial number of additional securities by us, or the perception that such issuances could occur, may adversely affect prevailing market prices for the Subordinate Voting Shares. With any additional issuance of our securities, investors will suffer dilution to their voting power and we may experience dilution in our revenue and earnings per share.
Sales of substantial amounts of Subordinate Voting Shares in the public market or the perception that such substantial sales may occur may have an adverse effect on the market price of the Subordinate Voting Shares.
Sales of a substantial number of Subordinate Voting Shares in the public market could occur at any time either by existing holders of Subordinate Voting Shares or by holders of Proportionate Voting Shares that are converted into Subordinate Voting Shares. These sales, or the market perception that shareholders intend to sell a large number of Subordinate Voting Shares, could reduce the market price of the Subordinate Voting Shares. If this occurs and continues, it could impair our ability to issue Subordinate Voting Shares as consideration in our acquisitions, raise additional capital through the sale of securities, and attract investors, along with other adverse consequences.
Upon issuance, transfer restrictions under securities laws or contractual terms may apply to the Subordinate Voting Shares. When transfer restrictions expire or are otherwise lifted, the holders of the unrestricted Subordinate Voting Shares may seek to sell the shares in the public markets, and the increase in the volume of available Subordinate Voting Shares for sale may have an adverse effect on the market price of the Subordinate Voting Shares.
When issued, Subordinate Voting Shares may be subject to restrictions on transfer under applicable securities laws or contractual terms. In anticipation of and following the expiration or lifting of these transfer restrictions, the sales price of the Subordinate Voting Shares may experience a decline due to additional Subordinate Voting Shares being available for sale on the public markets. The sale of a significant amount of Subordinate Voting Shares by existing shareholders or the perception by investors that such sales may occur, could adversely affect the prevailing market price for the Subordinate Voting Shares.
The Subordinate Voting Shares are subject to price volatility.
The market price for the Subordinate Voting Shares may be volatile and subject to wide fluctuations in response to numerous factors, many of which will be beyond our control, including the following:
•actual or anticipated fluctuations in our annual and quarterly results of operations;
•operating and financial performance that varies from the expectations of management, securities analysts and investors;
•changes or anticipated changes in U.S. federal cannabis regulations, including the rescheduling of cannabis as a controlled substance and the ability of cannabis companies to access banking services;
•changes or anticipated changes in state cannabis regulations affecting our business and operations;
•the public announcement of pending or consummated material acquisitions, business combinations, divestitures, investments or partnerships by us or our competitors;
•recommendations by securities research analysts;
•changes in the economic performance or market valuations of companies in the cannabis industry;
•the addition or departure of our directors or executive officers and other key personnel;
•sales or perceived sales of additional Subordinate Voting Shares;
•announcements of developments and other material events by us or our competitors;
•fluctuations to our costs of vital production materials and services;
•changes in U.S. financial markets and economies and general market conditions, such as inflation, interest rates, recessions and product price volatility; and
•news reports relating to trends, concerns, technological or competitive developments, regulatory changes and other related issues in the cannabis industry or our target markets.
In recent years, the securities markets in the U.S. and Canada have experienced a high level of price and volume volatility, and the market prices of securities of many cannabis companies have experienced wide fluctuations in price which have not necessarily been related to the operating performance, underlying asset values or prospects of such companies. Increased levels of volatility and resulting market turmoil may adversely impact the price of the Subordinate Voting Shares. There can be no assurance that the fluctuations in price of the Subordinate Voting Shares will not occur.
A decline in the price or trading volume of the Subordinate Voting Shares could affect our ability to consummate acquisitions, expand existing operations, raise further capital and could cause increased dilution to shareholders and adversely impact our ability to continue current operations, which would have a negative impact on our revenues and profitability.
A prolonged decline in the price or trading volume of the Subordinate Voting Shares could in the future result in a reduction in the liquidity of the Subordinate Voting Shares and inhibit our ability to raise capital. Because a significant portion of our acquisitions and operations have been, and may continue to be, financed through the issuance of equity securities, a decline in the price or trading volume of the Subordinate Voting Shares could be especially detrimental to our growth strategy, liquidity and operations and may cause us to issue additional Subordinate Voting Shares we otherwise would not need to, which would be dilutive to our shareholders. Such reductions may force us to reallocate funds from other planned uses and may have a material adverse effect on our business plan and operations, including our ability to operationalize existing licenses, consummate acquisitions and complete planned capital expenditures. If the price or trading volume of the Subordinate Voting Shares declines, there can be no assurance that we will be able to raise additional capital or generate funds from operations sufficient to meet our obligations. If we are unable to raise sufficient capital in the future, we may not have the resources to continue our normal operations.
If securities or industry analysts do not publish research or reports about us or publish misleading, inaccurate, or unfavorable research about us, our business, our share price and trading volume could decline.
The trading market for the Subordinate Voting Shares may be influenced by the research and reports that securities or industry analysts publish about us, our business, prospects, market, or competitors. If few securities or industry analysts cover us, the trading price and volume of the Subordinate Voting Shares would likely be negatively impacted. If one or more of the analysts who covers us downgrades the Subordinate Voting Shares, publishes inaccurate or unfavorable research about our business, or provides more favorable relative recommendations about competitors, the price of the Subordinate Voting Shares would likely decline. If one or more of these analysts ceases coverage of us or fails to publish reports on us regularly, demand for the Subordinate Voting Shares could decrease, which could cause the Subordinate Voting Share price or trading volume to decline.
An investor may face liquidity risks with an investment in the Subordinate Voting Shares.
There is a significant liquidity risk associated with an investment in the Subordinate Voting Shares. The Subordinate Voting Shares currently trade on Cboe in Canada and are quoted on the OTCQX in the U.S. We cannot predict at what prices the Subordinate Voting Shares will continue to trade or be quoted, and there is no assurance that an active trading market will be sustained. The Subordinate Voting Shares do not currently trade on any U.S. national securities exchange. In the event the Subordinate Voting Shares begin trading on any U.S. national securities exchange, we cannot predict at what prices the Subordinate Voting Shares will trade and there is no assurance that an active trading market will develop or be sustained.
Trading in securities quoted on the OTCQX is often thin and characterized by wide fluctuations in trading prices due to many factors, some of which may have little to do with our financial results, operations or business prospects. This volatility could depress the market price of the Subordinate Voting Shares for reasons unrelated to our operating performance or financial results. Moreover, the OTCQX is not a U.S. national securities exchange, and trading of securities on the OTCQX is often more sporadic than the trading of securities listed on a U.S. national securities exchange such as the Nasdaq Stock Market or the New York Securities Exchange. These factors may result in investors having difficulty reselling Subordinate Voting Shares on the OTCQX.
Shareholders have little or no rights to participate in our business affairs.
With the exception of the limited rights of shareholders under applicable Canadian laws, the day-to-day decisions regarding the management of our affairs will be made exclusively by the Board and our officers. Our shareholders will have little or no control over our future business, investment decisions, and affairs, including the selection and investment in licensees, dispensaries, cultivation operations and real estate. We may also retain consultants, advisors and agents to provide various services to us, over which the shareholders will have no control. There can be no assurance that the Board, our officers, advisors or agents will effectively manage and direct our affairs.
We do not expect to declare or pay dividends, and restrictions in our credit facility restrict our ability to pay cash dividends.
Holders of the Subordinate Voting Shares and Proportionate Voting Shares will not have a right to receive dividends on such shares unless declared by the Board. We have not paid dividends in the past, and we do not anticipate that we will declare or pay any dividends in the foreseeable future. The declaration of dividends is at the discretion of the Board, even if we have sufficient funds, net of our liabilities, to pay dividends, and the declaration of any dividend will depend on our financial results, cash requirements, future prospects, credit facility restrictions and other factors deemed relevant by the Board. Any dividends paid by us would be subject to withholding taxes as further summarized under the heading “Risks Related to Taxation.”
Our voting control is concentrated.
As of February 25, 2025, George Archos, our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, exercises in the aggregate, approximately 7.5% of the voting power in respect of our outstanding shares. In addition, per a public ownership filing made by the entity, Eminence Capital, LP beneficially owned 41,431,627 Subordinate Voting Shares as of December 31, 2024, the date of Eminence Capital LP’s last filing regarding its holdings of Verano equity, which represents approximately 11.5% of the voting power in respect of our outstanding shares. As a result, Mr. Archos and Eminence Capital, LP each has substantial ability to control the outcome of matters submitted to our shareholders for approval, including the election and removal of directors and any material business transactions. Even if Mr. Archos does not retain any employment with us, he will continue to have the ability to exercise this voting power.
As our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Archos has control over our day-to-day management and the implementation of major strategic decisions, subject to authorization and oversight by the Board. As a member of the Board, Mr. Archos owes a fiduciary duty to the Company and is obligated to act honestly and in good faith.
Such concentration of voting power could have the effect of delaying, deterring, or preventing a change of control or other business combination, which could, in turn, have an adverse effect on the market price of our Subordinate Voting Shares or prevent our stockholders from realizing a premium over the then-prevailing market price for their Subordinate Voting Shares. In addition, sales of significant amounts of shares beneficially held by Mr. Archos or Eminence Capital, LP or the prospect of these sales, could adversely affect the market price of our Subordinate Voting Shares.
Risks Related to Taxation
We are subject to Canadian and United States tax on our worldwide income.
We are deemed to be a resident of Canada for Canadian federal income tax purposes by virtue of being organized under the laws of British Columbia, a province of Canada. Accordingly, we are subject to Canadian taxation on our worldwide income, in accordance with the rules set forth in the Income Tax Act (Canada) (the “Tax Act”) generally applicable to corporations residing in Canada.
Notwithstanding that we are deemed to be a resident of Canada for Canadian federal income tax purposes, we are also treated as a U.S. corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes, pursuant to Section 7874(b) of the Code, and we are subject to U.S. federal income tax on our worldwide income. As a result, we are subject to taxation both in Canada and the U.S., which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Accordingly, all our prospective investors and shareholders should consult with their own tax advisors in this regard.
We may not be successful in defending our tax filing positions, which could adversely impact our financial condition and results of operations.
If our tax positions, including with respect to employee retention credits available under the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (“CARES”) Act, were to be challenged by federal, state, local or foreign tax jurisdictions, we may not be wholly successful in defending our tax filing positions. We record reserves for unrecognized tax benefits based on our assessment of the probability of successfully sustaining tax filing positions. Our management exercises significant judgment when assessing the probability of successfully sustaining our tax filing positions, and in determining whether a contingent tax liability should be recorded and, if so, estimating the amount. If our tax filing positions are successfully challenged, payments could be required that are in excess of reserved amounts, or we may be required to reduce the carrying amount of our net deferred tax asset, either of which could be significant to our financial condition and results of operations.
As a cannabis business, the IRS takes the view that we are subject to certain tax provisions that have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Under Section 280E of the Code, “no deduction or credit shall be allowed for any amount paid or incurred during the taxable year in carrying on any trade or business if such trade or business (or the activities which comprise such trade or business) consists of trafficking in controlled substances (within the meaning of Schedule I and II of the CSA) which is prohibited by Federal law or the law of any state in which such trade or business is conducted.” The IRS has interpreted this provision to apply to cannabis operations, prohibiting cannabis operators such as us, from deducting expenses directly associated with cannabis businesses. Section 280E and related IRS enforcement activity has had a significant impact on the operations of cannabis companies. As a result, an otherwise profitable business may, in fact, operate at a loss, after taking into account its United States income tax expenses. The Company has taken a position that it may deduct ordinary and necessary business expenses and that such expenses are not limited to the application of Section 280E of the Code.
The IRS has asserted against various state-legal cannabis businesses in the U.S that Section 280E applies to limit deductions for such businesses. Although the IRS has clarified its position by allowing the deduction of certain expenses, the IRS has interpreted this allowance very narrowly, deeming substantial other customary operating and general administrative costs as non-deductible. While there are currently several pending cases before various administrative and federal courts challenging the applicability of Section 280E, there is no guarantee that these administrative and/or federal courts will issue an interpretation of Section 280E that aligns with our position or that is otherwise favorable to the cannabis industry.
The IRS’s interpretations of Section 280E of the Code substantially limits our ability to deduct certain expenses from our federal taxable income for U.S. tax purposes.
If the IRS determined, and courts upheld that Section 280E does apply to restrict our deduction of business expenses, our U.S. federal taxable income would likely exceed our actual profits, and the IRS would likely continue to apply Section 280E to us indefinitely. This result may change if cannabis is rescheduled as a Schedule III substance under the CSA or if federal legislation affects Section 280E. We cannot predict whether such rescheduling or federal legislation will occur within a given timeframe or at all, and thus cannot predict the future applicability or effect of Section 280E on our business or operations.
Dividends, if ever paid, on the Subordinate Voting Shares or Proportionate Voting Shares are subject to Canadian or United States withholding tax.
It is currently not anticipated that we will pay any dividends on the Subordinate Voting Shares or Proportionate Voting Shares in the foreseeable future.
To the extent dividends are paid, dividends received by our shareholders who are not residents of the U.S. (“Non-U.S. Holders”) and who are residents of Canada for purposes of the Tax Act will be subject to U.S. withholding tax. Any dividends may not qualify for a reduced rate of withholding tax under the U.S.-Canada income tax treaty (“U.S.-Canada Treaty”). In addition, a Canadian foreign tax credit or a deduction in respect of such U.S. withholding taxes paid may not be available.
Dividends received by shareholders who are residents of the U.S. (“U.S. Holders”) will not be subject to U.S. withholding tax but will be subject to Canadian withholding tax. Any dividends may not qualify for a reduced rate of withholding tax under the U.S.-Canada Treaty. For U.S. federal income tax purposes, a U.S. Holder may elect for any taxable year to receive either a credit or a deduction for all foreign income taxes paid by the holder during the year. Dividends paid by us will be characterized as U.S. source income for purposes of the foreign tax credit rules under the Code. Accordingly, U.S. Holders generally will not be able to claim a credit for any Canadian tax withheld unless, depending on the circumstances, they have an excess foreign tax credit limitation due to other foreign source income that is subject to a low or zero rate of foreign tax. Subject to certain limitations, a U.S. Holder should be able to take a deduction for the U.S. Holder’s Canadian tax paid, provided that the U.S. Holder has not elected to credit other foreign taxes during the same taxable year.
Dividends received by Non-U.S. Holders who are not residents of Canada for purposes of the Tax Act will be subject to U.S. withholding tax and will also be subject to Canadian withholding tax. These dividends may not qualify for a reduced rate of U.S. withholding tax under any income tax treaty otherwise applicable to our shareholders, subject to examination of the relevant treaty. These dividends may, however, qualify for a reduced rate of Canadian withholding tax under any income tax treaty otherwise applicable to our shareholders, subject to examination of the relevant treaty.
Each of our shareholders should seek tax advice, based on such shareholder’s particular facts and circumstances, from an independent tax advisor.
The transfer of Subordinate Voting Shares may be subject to U.S. estate and generation-skipping transfer tax.
Because the Subordinate Voting Shares will be treated as shares of a U.S. domestic corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes, the U.S. estate and generation-skipping transfer tax rules generally may apply to a Non-U.S. Holder of the Subordinate Voting Shares.
Each of our shareholders should seek tax advice, based on such shareholder’s particular facts and circumstances, from an independent tax advisor.
We may be classified as a USRPHC.
We are treated as a U.S. domestic corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes under Section 7874(b) of the Code. As a result, the taxation of Non-U.S. Holders upon a disposition of Subordinate Voting Shares or Proportionate Voting Shares generally depends on whether we are classified as a U.S. real property holding corporation (a “USRPHC”) under the Code. We do not believe that we are or have been, and we do not anticipate becoming, a USRPHC. However, we do not expect to seek formal confirmation of our status as a non-USRPHC from the IRS. If we were to be considered a USRPHC, Non-U.S. Holders may be subject to U.S. federal income tax on any gain associated with the disposition of Subordinate Voting Shares or Proportionate Voting Shares, as applicable.
Changes in tax laws may affect us and our shareholders.
There can be no assurance that our Canadian and U.S. federal income tax treatment or an investment in us will not be modified, prospectively or retroactively, by legislative, judicial or administrative action, in a manner adverse to us or our shareholders.

---

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
None.

---

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
The following tables set forth the Company’s owned and leased physical properties as of February 25, 2025, which includes the corporate principal office, a call center, locations of operating dispensaries, dispensaries under construction and actively being planned, and locations for operating cultivation and processing facilities and cultivation and processing facilities under construction. In some cases, dispensary sites under construction or being planned are intended to be re-location sites. The cultivation and processing facilities in operation comprise over 1.1 million square feet.
State/City Comments/Description County Owned/Leased Use Operational
*Subject to Mortgage
ARIZONA Four cultivation facilities, one office, eight operating dispensary sites, one vacant leased site and one parking lease for the Prescott dispensary
Chandler Maricopa Leased Office Yes
Chandler Maricopa Leased Dispensary Yes
Chino Valley Yavapai Leased Cultivation Yes
Coolidge Pinal Owned Cultivation Yes
Mesa* Maricopa Owned Dispensary Yes
Mesa Maricopa Leased Dispensary Yes
Phoenix Maricopa Leased Dispensary Yes
Phoenix Maricopa Owned Dispensary Yes
Phoenix Vacant (operations moved to below owned Phoenix site) Maricopa Leased Dispensary No
Phoenix* Maricopa Owned Dispensary Yes
Prescott Yavapai Leased Dispensary Yes
Prescott Yavapai Leased Parking Yes
Tempe Maricopa Leased Dispensary and Cultivation Yes
Winslow* Navajo Owned Cultivation Yes
CONNECTICUT One cultivation facility and five operating dispensary sites. Two dispensary sites under construction and one office and storage site
Enfield Under Construction Hartford Owned Dispensary No
Newington Hartford Leased Dispensary Yes
Rocky Hill* Hartford Owned Cultivation Yes
Meriden New Haven Leased Dispensary Yes
Meriden New Haven Owned Office/Storage Yes
Naugatuck New Haven Leased Dispensary Yes
Waterbury New Haven Leased Dispensary Yes
Norwich New London Leased Dispensary Yes
Ashford Under Construction Windham Leased Dispensary No
State/City Comments/Description County Owned/Leased Use Operational
FLORIDA One call center/office, two operating cultivation facilities, eighty operating dispensary sites, two dispensary sites under construction, ten planned dispensary sites, one planned cultivation facility
Gainesville Alachua Leased Dispensary Yes
Panama City Bay Leased Dispensary Yes
West Melbourne* Brevard Owned Dispensary Yes
Melbourne Brevard Leased Dispensary Yes
Merritt Island Brevard Leased Dispensary Yes
Satellite Beach Brevard Leased Dispensary Yes
Titusville Brevard Leased Dispensary Yes
Deerfield Beach Broward Leased Dispensary Yes
Hollywood Broward Leased Dispensary Yes
Tamarac Broward Leased Dispensary Yes
Port Charlotte* Charlotte Owned Dispensary Yes
Orange Park Clay Leased Dispensary Yes
Crystal River Under Construction Citrus Leased Dispensary No
Marco Island Collier Leased Dispensary Yes
Lake City Columbia Leased Dispensary Yes
Jacksonville Beach Duval Leased Dispensary Yes
Jacksonville Duval Leased Dispensary Yes
Jacksonville Duval Leased Dispensary Yes
Jacksonville In Planning Duval Owned Dispensary No
Jacksonville In Planning Duval Leased Dispensary No
Pensacola Escambia Leased Dispensary Yes
Spring Hill Hernando Leased Dispensary Yes
Sebring Highlands Leased Dispensary Yes
Apollo Beach* Hillsborough Owned Cultivation Yes
Apollo Beach* Hillsborough Owned Dispensary Yes
Apollo Beach Hillsborough Owned Office Yes
Brandon Hillsborough Leased Dispensary Yes
Tampa Hillsborough Leased Dispensary Yes
Tampa Hillsborough Leased Dispensary Yes
Tampa Hillsborough Leased Dispensary Yes
Tampa Hillsborough Leased Dispensary Yes
Sebastian Indian River Leased Dispensary Yes
Lady Lake Lake Leased Dispensary Yes
Bonita Springs Lee Leased Dispensary Yes
Cape Coral Lee Leased Dispensary Yes
Fort Myers Lee Leased Dispensary Yes
Fort Myers* Lee Owned Dispensary Yes
Fort Myers Lee Leased Dispensary Yes
Tallahassee* Leon Owned Dispensary Yes
Tallahassee In Planning Leon Leased Dispensary No
Bradenton Manatee Leased Dispensary Yes
Bradenton Manatee Leased Dispensary Yes
Ocala Marion Leased Dispensary Yes
Hobe Sound Martin Leased Dispensary Yes
Stuart Martin Leased Dispensary Yes
Kendall Miami-Dade Leased Dispensary Yes
Naranja Miami-Dade Leased Dispensary Yes
North Miami Miami-Dade Owned Dispensary Yes
North Miami Beach Miami-Dade Leased Dispensary Yes
Palmetto Bay In Planning Miami-Dade Leased Dispensary No
State/City Comments/Description County Owned/Leased Use Operational
Key West Monroe Leased Dispensary Yes
Yulee Nassau Leased Dispensary Yes
Shalimar Okaloosa Leased Dispensary Yes
Apopka Orange Leased Dispensary Yes
Orlando Orange Leased Dispensary Yes
Orlando Orange Leased Dispensary Yes
Orlando Orange Leased Dispensary Yes
Okeechobee Palm Beach Leased Dispensary Yes
Wellington Palm Beach Leased Dispensary Yes
West Palm Beach Palm Beach Leased Dispensary Yes
West Palm Beach Palm Beach Leased Dispensary Yes
Boynton Beach Palm Beach Leased Dispensary Yes
Lutz Pasco Leased Dispensary Yes
Port Richey Pasco Leased Dispensary Yes
Zephyrhills Pasco Leased Dispensary Yes
Clearwater Pinellas Leased Dispensary Yes
Clearwater Pinellas Leased Dispensary Yes
Pinellas Park Pinellas Leased Dispensary Yes
St. Petersburg Pinellas Leased Dispensary Yes
Auburndale Polk Leased Dispensary Yes
Haines City Polk Leased Dispensary Yes
Lakeland Polk Leased Dispensary Yes
Winter Haven Polk Leased Dispensary Yes
Palatka Putnam Owned Cultivation Yes
Palatka Putnam Leased Dispensary Yes
Navarre Santa Rosa Leased Dispensary Yes
North Port Sarasota Leased Dispensary Yes
Sarasota Sarasota Leased Dispensary Yes
Sarasota Sarasota Leased Dispensary Yes
Venice Sarasota Leased Dispensary Yes
Longwood* Seminole Owned Dispensary Yes
Winter Springs Seminole Leased Dispensary Yes
St Augustine St. Johns Leased Dispensary Yes
Fort Pierce St. Lucie Leased Dispensary Yes
Port Saint Lucie St. Lucie Leased Dispensary Yes
Orange City Volusia Leased Dispensary Yes
Ormond Beach Volusia Leased Dispensary Yes
Port Orange Volusia Leased Dispensary Yes
Daytona Beach In Planning Volusia Leased Dispensary No
Miramar Beach In Planning Walton Leased Dispensary No
Palm Bay In Planning Brevard Leased Dispensary No
Deltona In Planning Volusia Leased Dispensary No
Englewood In Planning Charlotte Leased Dispensary No
New Smyrna Beach Under Construction Volusia Leased Dispensary No
Lehigh Acres In Planning Lee Leased Dispensary No
Ocala In Planning Marion Owned Cultivation No
State/City Comments/Description County Owned/Leased Use Operational
ILLINOIS One corporate office, one storage facility, one cultivation facility, ten dispensary sites, and one leased warehouse
Chicago Cook Leased Dispensary Yes
Chicago Cook Leased Office/Storage Yes
Chicago Cook Leased Dispensary Yes
Chicago Cook Leased Office Yes
Chicago Cook Owned Dispensary Yes
Evanston Cook Leased Dispensary Yes
Prospect Heights Cook Leased Dispensary Yes
Lombard DuPage Leased Dispensary Yes
Naperville DuPage Leased Dispensary Yes
Albion Edwards Owned Cultivation Yes
Albion Edwards Leased Warehouse Yes
Aurora Kane Leased Dispensary Yes
St. Charles Kane Leased Dispensary Yes
Highland Park* Lake Owned Dispensary Yes
MARYLAND One cultivation facility and four operating dispensaries
Towson Baltimore Leased Dispensary Yes
Elkridge Howard Leased Dispensary Yes
Jessup* Howard Owned Cultivation Yes
Germantown Montgomery Leased Dispensary Yes
Pasadena* Anne Arundel Owned Dispensary Yes
MASSACHUSETTS One reduced operations cultivation facility and two operating dispensaries
Sharon Norfolk Leased Dispensary Yes
Sharon Norfolk Owned Cultivation Yes
Plymouth Plymouth Leased Dispensary Yes
MICHIGAN One operating dispensary
Buchanan Berrien Owned Dispensary Yes
NEVADA One operating cultivation facility, five operating dispensary sites and one dispensary under construction
Carson City Carson City Leased Dispensary Yes
North Las Vegas Under Construction Clark Owned Dispensary No
Las Vegas Clark Owned Dispensary Yes
North Las Vegas Clark Owned Cultivation Yes
North Las Vegas Clark Leased Dispensary Yes
Spring Valley Clark Leased Dispensary Yes
Reno Washoe Leased Dispensary Yes
State/City Comments/Description County Owned/Leased Use Operational
NEW JERSEY One cultivation facility, four dispensary sites, and one parking lease for Lawrence dispensary
Mount Holly Burlington Leased Dispensary Yes
Branchburg* Hunterdon Owned Cultivation Yes
Lawrence Mercer Leased Parking Yes
Lawrence Mercer Leased Dispensary Yes
Neptune Monmouth Leased Dispensary Yes
Elizabeth Union Leased Dispensary Yes
OHIO One cultivation facility, five operating dispensaries, one dispensary in planning, and one parking lot
Cincinnati Hamilton Leased Dispensary Yes
Dayton Montgomery Leased Dispensary Yes
Canton Stark Leased Dispensary Yes
Canton Stark Owned Cultivation Yes
Bowling Green Wood Leased Dispensary Yes
Newark* Licking Owned Dispensary Yes
Antwerp Paulding Owned Parking Yes
PENNSYLVANIA One cultivation facility, eighteen dispensary sites, one cultivation facility under construction, one cultivation facility that is not operational, one parking lease, one leased storage space, one office space, two vacant dispensary sites
Monroeville* Allegheny Owned Dispensary Yes
Pittsburgh Allegheny Leased Dispensary Yes
Pittsburgh Allegheny Leased Dispensary Yes
Fairless Hills Bucks Leased Dispensary Yes
Sellersville Bucks Leased Parking Yes
Sellersville Bucks Leased Dispensary Yes
Cranberry* Butler Owned Dispensary Yes
Malvern Chester Leased Dispensary Yes
Malvern Chester Leased Storage Yes
Harrisburg Dauphin Leased Dispensary Yes
Chester* Delaware Owned Cultivation Yes
Chester Delaware Leased Cultivation No
Chester* Delaware Owned Dispensary No
Clifton Heights Delaware Leased Dispensary Yes
Upland Under Construction Delaware Owned Cultivation No
West Chester Delaware Leased Dispensary Yes
Altoona Logan Leased Dispensary Yes
Abington* Montgomery Owned Dispensary Yes
Abington Montgomery Leased Dispensary No
Jenkintown Montgomery Leased Office No
Wynnewood* Montgomery Owned Dispensary Yes
Norristown Montgomery Leased Dispensary Yes
Philadelphia Philadelphia Leased Dispensary Yes
Washington* Washington Owned Dispensary Yes
New Kensington Westmoreland Leased Dispensary Yes
York York Leased Dispensary Yes
State/City Comments/Description County Owned/Leased Use Operational
VIRGINIA One cultivation facility and six operating dispensaries
Hampton Hampton Leased Dispensary Yes
Norfolk Norfolk Leased Dispensary Yes
Portsmouth Portsmouth Leased Cultivation and Dispensary Yes
Suffolk Suffolk Leased Dispensary Yes
Virginia Beach Virginia Beach Leased Dispensary Yes
Williamsburg York Leased Dispensary Yes
WEST VIRGINIA One cultivation facility and five operating dispensaries
Clarksburg Harrison Leased Dispensary Yes
Morgantown Monongalia Leased Dispensary Yes
Westover Monongalia Leased Dispensary Yes
Wheeling Ohio Leased Dispensary Yes
Beaver Raleigh Leased Cultivation Yes
Buckhannon Upshur Leased Dispensary Yes
Properties Subject to an Encumbrance.
A substantial portion of the real property owned by the Company’s subsidiaries is subject to mortgages that secure outstanding indebtedness for borrowed money or are otherwise pledged as collateral securing the obligations of the Borrowers that are outstanding under the 2022 Credit Agreement. In addition, the Borrowers have pledged a substantial portion of their other assets to secure, on a joint and several basis, the obligations under the 2022 Credit Agreement, including their cash, accounts receivable, inventory, licenses and permits, intellectual property, equipment and ownership interests in other Borrowers. Dollar amounts below are in thousands.
On June 29, 2022, the Company entered into a real estate loan with a community bank to borrow an initial principal amount of $18,000 secured by real estate and improvements thereon in Branchburg, New Jersey. The mortgage bears an interest rate of 4% and matures in July 2047.
On March 9, 2023, the Company entered into a real estate loan with a community bank to borrow an initial principal amount of $20,000 secured by real estate and improvements thereon in Rocky Hill, Connecticut. The loan bears an interest rate of 5.75% and matures in March 2028, and may be extended for four additional five-year periods.
On September 29, 2023, the Company entered into a real estate loan with a community bank to borrow an initial principal amount of $14,500 secured by real estate in Chester, Pennsylvania. The loan bears an interest rate of 7.5% and matures in October 2028.
On December 26, 2023, the Company entered into a real estate loan with a community bank to borrow an anitial principal amount of $27,999 secured by real estate in Apollo Beach, Florida. The loan bears an interest rate of 8.34% and matures in December 2028.

---

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
On January 31, 2022, the Company entered into an Arrangement Agreement (the “GGH Arrangement Agreement”) with Vireo Growth Inc., formerly known as Goodness Growth Holdings, Inc. (“GGH”), pursuant to which it agreed to acquire all of the issued and outstanding equity interests of GGH in exchange for equity interests in the Company, subject to the conditions set forth in the GGH Arrangement Agreement. On October 13, 2022, the Company provided written notice to GGH of GGH’s breach of the GGH Arrangement Agreement and exercised the Company’s termination rights under the GGH Arrangement Agreement. On October 21, 2022, GGH filed suit against the Company in the Supreme Court of British Columbia alleging that the Company breached (i) the GGH Arrangement Agreement through, among other things, the purported wrongful repudiation of the GGH Arrangement Agreement, (ii) the duty of good faith, and (iii) the duty of honest performance in contract. In addition, on November 14, 2022, the Company filed a counterclaim asserting that GGH owes it a termination fee in the amount of $14,875,000, or alternatively, the reimbursement of out-of-pocket fees and expenses of up to $3,000,000 as a result of our termination of the GGH Arrangement Agreement, which was based upon our belief that GGH breached covenants and representations in the GGH Arrangement Agreement and the occurrence of other termination events. GGH filed a response to such counterclaim on December 7, 2022, in which GGH denied it was obligated to pay any termination fee or transaction expenses. As of December 31, 2024, both the Company and GGH are engaged in ongoing discovery efforts.
On May 2, 2024, GGH filed an application with the Supreme Court of British Columbia seeking an order granting summary trial in the ongoing litigation between the Company and GGH regarding the GGH Arrangement Agreement. In the application, GGH stated it is seeking $860,900,000 in damages, plus costs and interest (the “GGH Application for Summary Trial”). On June 19, 2024, the Company filed an application in response seeking: (i) dismissal of the GGH Application for Summary Trial on the grounds that the issues raised by it are not suitable for disposition by summary trial and will not assist the efficient resolution of the proceeding; and (ii) an order that the report on damages filed by GGH in support of the GGH Application for Summary Trial is inadmissible and shall be excluded from evidence in the trial, or any summary trial, of this matter. On September 17, 2024, the Company filed an amended response and counterclaim with the Supreme Court of British Columbia, primarily in response to communications recently disclosed by GGH. The Company can provide no guarantees or assurances that it will prevail or settle this lawsuit or its counterclaim on favorable terms, if at all, and an adverse outcome could have a material adverse effect on its business, results of operations and financial condition.
See “Note 13 - Contingencies and Other” in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in this Form 10-K for further information.

---

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURE
ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
Not Applicable.
PART II

---

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
Market Information
The Subordinate Voting Shares are traded on Cboe Canada under the stock symbol, “VRNO” and are traded over-the-counter in the U.S. on the OTCQX under the symbol “VRNOF.” Any over-the-counter market quotations reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, mark-down or commission and may not necessarily represent actual transactions.
Shareholders
As of February 25, 2025, there were 601 qualified holders of record of our Subordinate Voting Shares and no registered holders of record of our Proportionate Voting Shares.
Dividends
There are no restrictions in the Company’s articles that prevent the Company from paying dividends. However, the Company has not paid dividends in the past, and it is not anticipated that the Company will pay any dividends in the foreseeable future. Rather, the Company currently intends to retain future earnings, if any, to fund the development and growth of its business, pay indebtedness and does not intend to pay any cash dividends on its shares for the foreseeable future. Any decision to pay dividends in the future will be made by the Board on the basis of earnings, financial requirements and other conditions existing at the time. In the event any dividends are declared and paid, both the outstanding Subordinate Voting Shares and Proportionate Voting Shares, if any, will share in the dividends with each Proportionate Voting Share being entitled to 100 times the amount of the dividend paid on each Subordinate Voting Share and each Subordinate Voting Share being entitled to 1/100 of the amount of the dividend paid on each Proportionate Voting Share. In the event the Board determines that a dividend is in the best interest of the Company, the terms and payment of such dividend must comply with the restrictions and covenants set forth in the 2022 Credit Agreement.
Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities
The following information represents securities sold by the Company for the period covered by this Form 10-K which were not registered under the Securities Act and which were not previously disclosed on a Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q or Current Report on Form 8-K. Included are new issuances, securities issued in exchange for property, services or other securities, and securities issued upon conversion or vesting of other Company securities not required to be disclosed in Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and Current Reports on Form 8-K. Certain sales of unregistered securities were reported on Current Reports on Form 8-K during 2024.
Equity Incentive Plan
During the year ended December 31, 2024, pursuant to the Verano Holdings Corp. Stock and Incentive Plan (the “Plan”), the Company issued 904,268 Subordinate Voting Shares, which were not registered under the Securities Act, in respect of vested restricted stock units (“RSUs”). The Company issued these securities pursuant to the exemption from registration provided by Rule 701 of the Securities Act, as the RSUs and Subordinate Voting Shares were issued in connection with a compensatory benefit plan and/or Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act with respect to recipients who were accredited investors.
Acquisition Sales
On December 28, 2023, the Company became contractually obligated, upon the completion of certain conditions precedent, to issue $1,250,000 worth of Subordinate Voting Shares, in the aggregate, as consideration for the acquisition of certain assets from Ivy Hall Mount Holly, LLC. During 2024, 297,225 Subordinate Voting Shares were issued as a portion of such consideration, representing a value of $625,000. The Company expects to issue an additional 297,555 Subordinate Voting Shares as the final portion of such consideration during 2025. All of such Subordinate Voting Shares were, and will be, issued in reliance upon the exemptions from registration afforded by Section 4(a)(2) and Rule 506 promulgated under the Securities Act, because (i) the issuances were not made by general solicitation or advertising and (ii) the issuances were made only to “accredited investors” (as such term is fined in Rule 501(a) of Regulation D under the Securities Act).
On November 10, 2021, the Company entered into an agreement (the “Caring Nature Purchase Agreement”) to acquire all the issued and outstanding equity interests in Caring Nature LLC (“Caring Nature”), which operates a dispensary in Connecticut. The transaction closed on December 20, 2021. The Caring Nature Purchase Agreement included $2,000,000 of contingent consideration to be paid in Subordinate Voting Shares. On October 21, 2024, following the fulfillment of conditions for the contingent consideration, the Company issued 616,276 Subordinate Voting Shares to the previous member of Caring Nature. All of such Subordinate Voting Shares were issued in reliance upon the exemptions from registration afforded by Section 4(a)(2) and Rule 506 promulgated under the Securities Act, because (i) the issuances were not made by general solicitation or advertising and (ii) the issuances were made only to an “accredited investor” (as such term is fined in Rule 501(a) of Regulation D under the Securities Act).
Stock Performance Graph
The information contained in this Stock Performance Graph section shall not be deemed to be “soliciting material” or “filed” or incorporated by reference in future filings with the SEC, or subject to the liabilities of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, except to the extent that we specifically incorporate it by reference into a document filed under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act.
The following graph compares the cumulative total shareholder return on the Subordinate Voting Shares from February 17, 2021 to December 31, 2024, with the comparable cumulative return of the Russell 2000 Index and a selected peer group of companies. From February 17, 2021 through October 17, 2023, the Subordinate Voting Shares were traded on the CSE under the stock symbol VRNO. On October 18, 2023, the Subordinate Voting Shares began trading on Cboe under the stock symbol VRNO. The below chart shows cumulative total shareholder returns for Verano and the comparison assumes all dividends have been reinvested (if any) and an initial investment of $100 on February 17, 2021. The returns of each company in the peer group have been weighted to reflect their market capitalization. The stock price performance on the following graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance.
Base Period Years Ending
Company/Index 2/17/2021 12/31/2021 12/31/2022 12/31/2023 12/31/2024
Verano Holdings Corp. 100 38.22 9.62 13.47 3.71
Russell 2000 Index 100 99.52 78.07 89.85 98.85
Peer Group 100 44.31 16.89 18.63 12.74
Below are the specific companies included in the peer group.
Peer Group Companies
-Cresco Labs Inc.
-Trulieve Cannabis Corp.
-Curaleaf Holdings, Inc.
-Green Thumb Industries Inc.
Repurchases
During the year ended December 31, 2024, the Company did not repurchase any securities.
CERTAIN CANADIAN FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSIDERATIONS
The following is, as of the date of this Form 10-K, a summary of the principal Canadian federal income tax considerations generally applicable under the Tax Act to shareholders who beneficially own Subordinate Voting Shares, and who at all relevant times, for purposes of the Tax Act, (i) hold their Subordinate Voting Shares as capital property, (ii) deal at arm’s length with Verano and (iii) are not affiliated with Verano (each such person, a “Holder”). Generally, Subordinate Voting Shares will be considered to be capital property to the holder thereof provided that they are not held in the course of carrying on a business of buying and selling securities and have not been acquired in one or more transactions considered to be an adventure or concern in the nature of trade. Certain shareholders who are resident in Canada for purposes of the Tax Act and who might not otherwise be considered to hold their Subordinate Voting Shares as capital property may, in certain circumstances, be entitled to have their Subordinate Voting Shares and any other “Canadian security” (as defined in the Tax Act), owned by such holders in the taxation year in which the election is made, and in all subsequent taxation years, treated as capital property by making the irrevocable election permitted by Subsection 39(4) of the Tax Act. Shareholders should consult their own tax advisors regarding the potential application and consequences of this election in their particular circumstances.
This summary is not applicable to a Holder: (i) that is a “financial institution” (as defined in the Tax Act for purposes of the mark-to-market rules); (ii) an interest in which is a “tax shelter investment” (as defined in the Tax Act); (iii) that is a “specified financial institution” (as defined in the Tax Act); (iv) that has made a “functional currency” election under section 261 of the Tax Act; (v) that has received, or receives, Subordinate Voting Shares upon the exercise of an employee stock option, settlement of a restricted stock unit or pursuant to any other employee compensation plan; (vi) that is a corporation resident in Canada and that is, or becomes (or does not deal at arm’s length for purposes of the Tax Act with a corporation resident in Canada that is or becomes), as part of a series of transactions or events, controlled by a non-resident person (or by a group of non-resident persons that do not deal at arm’s length with each other for purposes of the Tax Act) for the purposes of the “foreign affiliate dumping” rules in the Tax Act; (vii) has entered into, or enters into, a “derivative forward agreement” or “synthetic disposition arrangement” (each as defined in the Tax Act) with respect to its Subordinate Voting Shares; (viii) that receives dividends on its Subordinate Voting Shares under, or as part of, a “dividend rental arrangement” (as defined in the Tax Act), (ix) that is exempt from Part I of the Tax Act; or (x) that is a partnership. Such Holders should consult their own tax advisors.
This summary also does not address the tax considerations applicable to holders of stock options, restricted stock units or any other equity-based compensation award. Such holders should consult their own tax advisors.
This summary is based upon the provisions of the Tax Act and the regulations thereunder (the “Tax Regulations”) in force on the date of this Form 10-K and the current published administrative policies and assessing practices of the Canada Revenue Agency (“CRA”) publicly available prior to the date of this Form 10-K. This summary takes into account all specific proposals to amend the Tax Act and the Tax Regulations which have been publicly announced by or on behalf of the Minister of Finance (Canada) prior to the date of this Form 10-K (the “Tax Proposals”) and, except as otherwise noted, assumes that the Tax Proposals will be enacted in their current form. There can be no assurance that any of the Tax Proposals will be implemented in their current form or at all. Except for the Tax Proposals, this summary does not otherwise take into account or anticipate any changes in law, whether by legislative, governmental or judicial decision or action, or changes in the administrative policies or assessing practices of the CRA. In addition, this summary does not take into account other federal or any provincial, territorial or foreign tax legislation or considerations, which may differ significantly from the Canadian federal income tax considerations discussed in this Form 10-K.
For purposes of the Tax Act, all amounts (including amounts related to the acquisition, holding or disposition of Subordinate Voting Shares, such as dividends, adjusted cost base and proceeds of disposition) must be expressed in Canadian dollars using the daily rate of exchange quoted by the Bank of Canada on the date such amounts arose, or such other rate of exchange as is acceptable to the CRA. The amount of income, capital gains, losses and capital losses may be affected by changes in foreign currency exchange rates.
Verano is a Canadian corporation for purposes of the Tax Act. As referenced under “Certain U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations,” Verano is also classified as U.S. domestic corporations for United States federal income tax purposes, with related consequences and potential consequences to Verano and its shareholders. Accordingly, all Holders should review the discussion under “Certain U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations,” and consult with their own tax advisors in this regard. For the purposes of the discussion of Canadian federal income tax considerations below, it has been assumed that Verano is and will be classified as a U.S. domestic corporation for United States federal income tax purposes at all relevant times. No legal opinion or tax ruling has been sought or obtained in this regard or with respect to any other assumptions made for purposes of this summary.
This summary is not exhaustive of all possible Canadian federal income tax considerations applicable to a Holder. The income or other tax consequences will vary depending on the particular circumstances of the Holder, including the province or provinces in which the Holder resides or carries on business. Accordingly, this summary is of a general nature only and is not intended to be, nor should it be construed to be, legal, business or tax advice or representations to any particular Holder. Holders should consult their own legal and tax advisors for advice with respect to the tax considerations described in this Form 10-K based on their particular circumstances.
Resident Shareholders
The following portion of this summary is generally applicable to a Holder who at all relevant times, for purposes of the Tax Act, is or is deemed to be resident in Canada (a “Resident Holder”).
Dividends on Subordinate Voting Shares
A Resident Holder generally will be required to include in computing its income for a taxation year any dividends received or deemed to be received on such Resident Holder’s Subordinate Voting Shares during such taxation year.
In the case of a Resident Holder who is an individual (other than certain trusts), such dividends will be subject to the gross-up and dividend tax credit rules generally applicable to dividends received from “taxable Canadian corporations” (as defined in the Tax Act), including the enhanced gross-up and dividend tax credit if such dividends are designated as “eligible dividends” (as defined in the Tax Act) by Verano. There may be limitations on the ability of Verano to designate dividends as eligible dividends.
In the case of a Resident Holder that is a corporation, the amount of any taxable dividend received or deemed to be received on such Resident Holder’s Subordinate Voting Shares and included in the Resident Holder’s income for the taxation year generally will be deductible in computing the Resident Holder’s taxable income. In certain circumstances, subsection 55(2) of the Tax Act may treat a taxable dividend received by a Resident Holder that is a corporation as proceeds of disposition or a capital gain. Resident Holders that are corporations should consult their own tax advisors having regard to their own circumstances.
A Resident Holder that is a “private corporation” (as defined in the Tax Act) or any other corporation resident in Canada controlled, whether because of a beneficial interest in one or more trusts or otherwise, by or for the benefit of an individual (other than a trust) or a related group of individuals (other than trusts), may be liable under Part IV of the Tax Act to pay an additional tax (refundable in certain circumstances) on dividends received or deemed to be received on the Subordinate Voting Shares to the extent that such dividends are deductible in computing the Resident Holder’s taxable income for the taxation year. A Resident Holder that, is a “Canadian-controlled private corporation” (“CCPC”) (as defined in the Tax Act) throughout the relevant taxation year, or “substantive CCPC” (as defined in the Tax Act) at any time in the relevant taxation year, may be liable to pay an additional tax (refundable in certain circumstances) on its “aggregate investment income” (as defined in the Tax Act), including any dividends received or deemed to be received to the extent that such dividends are not deductible in computing the Resident Holder’s taxable income for the taxation year.
A Resident Holder may be subject to United States withholding tax on dividends received on the Subordinate Voting Shares (see “Certain U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations”). Any United States withholding tax paid by or on behalf of a Resident Holder in respect of dividends received on the Subordinate Voting Shares by a Resident Holder may be eligible for foreign tax credit or deduction treatment where applicable under the Tax Act. Generally, a foreign tax credit in respect of a tax paid to a particular foreign country is limited to the Canadian tax otherwise payable in respect of income sourced in that country. Dividends received on the Subordinate Voting Shares by a Resident Holder may not be treated as income sourced in the United States for these purposes. Resident Holders should consult their own tax advisors with respect to the availability of any foreign tax credits or deductions under the Tax Act in respect of any United States withholding tax applicable to dividends on the Subordinate Voting Shares.
Disposition of Subordinate Voting Shares
A disposition or deemed disposition of a Subordinate Voting Share by a Resident Holder (except to Verano, unless purchased by Verano in the open market in a manner in which shares are normally purchased by any member of the public in the open market) will generally result in the Resident Holder realizing a capital gain (or capital loss) equal to the amount by which the proceeds of disposition of such Subordinate Voting Shares are greater (or less) than the aggregate of the Resident Holder’s adjusted cost base of such Subordinate Voting Shares and any reasonable costs of disposition. For a description of the treatment of capital gains and capital losses, see “Certain Canadian Federal Income Tax Considerations - Resident Shareholders - Taxation of Capital Gains and Capital Losses” below.
Taxation of Capital Gains and Capital Losses
Currently, one-half of any capital gain (a “taxable capital gain”) realized by a Resident Holder in a taxation year must be included in the Resident Holder’s income for the year, and one-half of any capital loss (an “allowable capital loss”) realized by a Resident Holder in a taxation year must be deducted from taxable capital gains realized by the Resident Holder in that year. Allowable capital losses for a taxation year in excess of taxable capital gains for that year may generally be carried back and deducted in any of the three preceding taxation years, or carried forward and deducted in any subsequent taxation year, against net taxable capital gains realized in such years, to the extent and under the circumstances specified in the Tax Act.
Under Tax Proposals released on September 23, 2024 (the “September 23 Tax Proposals”), the capital gains inclusion rate would generally be increased from one-half to two-thirds for a Resident Holder that is a corporation or a trust, and from one-half to two-thirds for a Resident Holder that is an individual (other than most types of trusts) realizing net capital gains above an annual C$250,000 threshold, in all cases for capital gains and capital losses realized on or after June 25, 2024. The September 23 Tax Proposals also contemplate adjustments of carried forward or carried back allowable capital losses to account for changes in the relevant inclusion rate. The status of the September 23 Tax Proposals, however, is uncertain as Parliament was prorogued on January 6, 2025, which will delay any fiscal action on the September 23 Tax Proposals until at least March 24, 2025, when Parliament is scheduled to resume. On January 31, 2025, the Minister of Finance (Canada) announced that the federal government is deferring the effective date of the September 23 Tax Proposals from June 25, 2024 to January 1, 2026. The September 23 Tax Proposals are complex and may be subject to further changes or withdrawal, and their application to a particular Resident Holder will depend on that Resident Holder’s particular circumstances. Resident Holders should consult their own tax advisors with respect to the September 23 Tax Proposals.
In the case of a Resident Holder that is a corporation, the amount of any capital loss realized on a disposition or deemed disposition by the Resident Holder of a Subordinate Voting Share may be reduced by the amount of dividends received or deemed to have been received by it on such share (and, in certain circumstances, a share exchanged for such share), to the extent and under the circumstances prescribed by the Tax Act. Similar rules may apply where a corporation is a member of a partnership or a beneficiary of a trust that owns such shares, or where a trust or partnership of which a corporation is a beneficiary or a member is a member of a partnership or a beneficiary of a trust that owns any such shares. Resident Holders to whom these rules may be relevant should consult their own tax advisors.
A Resident Holder that is a CCPC (as defined in the Tax Act) throughout the relevant taxation year, or a “substantive CCPC” (as defined in the Tax Act) at any time in the relevant taxation year, may be liable to pay an additional tax (refundable in certain circumstances) on its “aggregate investment income” (as defined in the Tax Act), including any taxable capital gains.
A Resident Holder may be subject to United States federal income tax on a gain realized on the disposition of a Subordinate Voting Share if Verano is classified as a USRPHC under the Code (see “Certain U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations”). United States federal income tax, if any, levied on any gain realized on a disposition of a Subordinate Voting Share may be eligible for a foreign tax credit under the Tax Act to the extent and under the circumstances described in the Tax Act. Generally, a foreign tax credit in respect of a tax paid to a particular foreign country is limited to the Canadian tax otherwise payable in respect of income sourced in that country. Gains realized on the disposition of a Subordinate Voting Share by a Resident Holder may not be treated as income sourced in the United States for these purposes. Resident Holders should consult their own tax advisors with respect to the availability of a foreign tax credit, having regard to their own particular circumstances.
Alternative Minimum Tax
Capital gains realized and taxable dividends received or deemed to be received by a Resident Holder that is an individual (including certain trusts) may affect the Resident Holder’s liability to pay alternative minimum tax under the Tax Act. Resident Holders should consult their own tax advisors with respect to the application of alternative minimum tax.
Eligibility for Investment
The Subordinate Voting Shares are, on the date hereof qualified investments for trusts governed by first home savings accounts (“FHSAs”), registered retirement savings plans (“RRSPs”), registered retirement income funds (“RRIFs”), registered education savings plans (“RESPs”), deferred profit sharing plans, registered disability savings plans (“RDSPs”) and tax-free savings accounts (“TFSAs”), (as those terms are defined in the Tax Act) provided that, on the date hereof, the Subordinate Voting Shares are listed on a “designated stock exchange” (as defined in the Tax Act), which currently includes Cboe Canada.
Notwithstanding that the Subordinate Voting Shares may be qualified investments for a trust governed by a FHSA, TFSA, RDSP, RRSP, RRIF or RESP (each a “Plan”), a holder of a FHSA, TFSA or RDSP, an annuitant under an RRSP or RRIF or a subscriber of an RESP (each a “Plan Holder”) will be subject to a penalty tax if the Subordinate Voting Shares are a “prohibited investment” within the meaning of the Tax Act (as defined in subsection 207.01(1) of the Tax Act) for a Plan. The Subordinate Voting Shares will generally not be a “prohibited investment” for a trust governed by a Plan for purposes of the prohibited investment rules if the Plan Holder deals at arm’s length with the Company for purposes of the Tax Act and does not have a “significant interest” (within the meaning of subsection 207.01(4) of the Tax Act) in the Company. In addition, the Subordinate Voting Shares will not be a “prohibited investment” for a Plan if the Subordinate Voting Shares are “excluded property” (as defined in subsection 207.01(1) of the Tax Act) for such Plan.
Non-Resident Shareholders
The following portion of this summary is generally applicable to a Holder who at all relevant times, for purposes of the Tax Act, (i) is not resident in Canada and is not deemed to be resident in Canada, (ii) does not use or hold, and is not deemed to use or hold, its Subordinate Voting Shares in, or in the course of carrying on, a business in Canada, (iii) is not a person who carries on an insurance business in Canada and elsewhere, (iv) is not an “authorized foreign bank” (as defined in the Tax Act), and (v) is not a “foreign affiliate” (as defined in the Tax Act) of a person resident in Canada (a “Non-Resident Holder”).
Dividends on Subordinate Voting Shares
A Non-Resident Holder will be subject to Canadian withholding tax on the amount of any dividends paid or credited, or deemed to be paid or credited, to it on its Subordinate Voting Shares. Under the Tax Act, the rate of withholding is 25% of the gross amount of the dividend. The withholding rate may be reduced pursuant to the provisions of an applicable income tax treaty or convention. Under the Canada-United States Income Tax Convention (1980), as amended (the “Canada - US Tax Treaty”), the withholding rate on any such dividend beneficially owned by a Non-Resident Holder that is a resident of the United States for purposes of the Canada - US Tax Treaty and fully entitled to the benefits of such treaty is generally reduced to 15%. The Multilateral Convention to Implement Tax Treaty Related Measures to Prevent Base Erosion and Profit Shifting of which Canada is a signatory, affects many of Canada’s bilateral tax treaties (but not the Canada-US Tax Treaty), including the ability to claim benefits thereunder. Non-Resident Holders should consult their own tax advisors to determine their entitlement to relief under an applicable income tax treaty or convention. Certain Non-Resident Holders may be subject to United States withholding tax on dividends received on the Subordinate Voting Shares (see “Certain U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations”).
Disposition of Subordinate Voting Shares
A Non-Resident Holder will not be subject to Canadian tax in respect of any capital gain realized on the disposition of its Subordinate Voting Shares unless such shares constitute “taxable Canadian property” (as defined in the Tax Act) of the Non-Resident Holder at the time of disposition and the Non-Resident Holder is not entitled to relief under an applicable income tax treaty or convention.
Provided the Subordinate Voting Shares are listed on a “designated stock exchange,” as defined in the Tax Act (which currently includes Cboe Canada), at the time of disposition, a Subordinate Voting Share will generally only be “taxable Canadian property” of a Non-Resident Holder at that time if, at any time during the 60-month period immediately preceding the disposition, the following two conditions were met concurrently: (i) more than 50% of the fair market value of the Subordinate Voting Share was derived directly or indirectly from one or any combination of real or immovable property situated in Canada, “Canadian resource properties” (as defined in the Tax Act), “timber resource properties” (as defined in the Tax Act) and options in respect of, interests in, or for civil law rights in, any such properties whether or not the properties exist; and (ii) one or any combination of the Non-Resident Holder, persons with whom the Non-Resident Holder did not deal at arm’s length or any partnership in which the Non-Resident Holder or persons with whom the Non-Resident Holder did not deal at arm’s length holds a membership interest directly or indirectly through one or more partnerships, owned 25% or more of the issued shares of any class or series of Verano. A Subordinate Voting Share may also be deemed to be “taxable Canadian property” in certain other circumstances.
If the Subordinate Voting Shares are “taxable Canadian property” to a Non-Resident Holder and such Non-Resident Holder is not exempt from Canadian tax in respect of the disposition of such Subordinate Voting Shares pursuant to an applicable income tax treaty or convention, the tax consequences as described above under the headings “Certain Canadian Federal Income Tax Considerations - Resident Shareholders - Taxation of Capital Gains and Capital Losses” will generally apply. Non-Resident Holders whose Subordinate Voting Shares may constitute “taxable Canadian property” should consult their own tax advisors.
CERTAIN U.S. FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSIDERATIONS
The following is a general summary of certain U.S. federal income tax considerations applicable to a U.S. Holder or a Non-U.S. Holder (each as defined below) arising from the ownership and disposition of Subordinate Voting Shares. This summary is for general information purposes only and does not purport to be a complete analysis or listing of all potential U.S. federal income tax considerations that may apply to a U.S. Holder or Non-U.S. Holder. In addition, this summary does not take into account the individual facts and circumstances of any particular U.S. Holder or Non-U.S. Holder that may affect the U.S. federal income tax consequences to such holder (as discussed below), including specific tax consequences to a holder under an applicable tax treaty. Accordingly, this summary is not intended to be, and should not be construed as, legal or U.S. federal income tax advice with respect to any holder. This summary is limited to U.S. federal income tax considerations, and does not address the U.S. federal alternative minimum, net investment income, U.S. federal estate and gift, U.S. state and local, or non-U.S. tax consequences of the ownership and disposition of such Subordinate Voting Shares. Except as specifically set forth below, this summary does not discuss applicable income tax reporting requirements. Each holder should consult its own tax advisor regarding all U.S. federal, U.S. state and local, and non-U.S. tax consequences of the ownership and disposition of Subordinate Voting Shares.
No opinion from U.S. legal counsel or ruling from the IRS has been requested, or will be obtained, regarding the U.S. federal income tax consequences of the ownership and disposition of Subordinate Voting Shares. This summary is not binding on the IRS, and the IRS is not precluded from taking a position that is different from, and contrary to, the positions taken in this summary. In addition, because the authorities on which this summary is based are subject to various interpretations, the IRS and the U.S. courts could disagree with one or more of the positions taken in this summary.
This summary does not address the U.S. federal income tax consequences to any particular person of the ownership and disposition of Subordinate Voting Shares. Each holder should consult its own tax advisor regarding all U.S. federal, U.S. state and local, and non-U.S. tax consequences of the ownership and disposition of Subordinate Voting Shares.
Scope of This Disclosure
Authorities
This summary is based on the Code, proposed, final and temporary U.S. Treasury Regulations, published rulings of the IRS, published administrative positions of the IRS, and U.S. court decisions that are applicable and, in each case, as in effect and available, as of the date of this Form 10-K. Any of the authorities on which this summary is based could be changed in a material and adverse manner at any time, and any such change could be applied on a prospective or retroactive basis which could affect the U.S. federal income tax considerations described in this summary. This summary does not discuss the potential effects, whether adverse or beneficial, of any proposed legislation that, if enacted, could be applied on a retroactive or prospective basis.
U.S. Holders
For purposes of this summary, the term “U.S. Holder” means a beneficial owner of Subordinate Voting Shares that is for U.S. federal income tax purposes:
•an individual who is a citizen or resident of the United States;
•a corporation (or other entity taxable as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes) created or organized in or under the laws of the United States, any state thereof or the District of Columbia;
•an estate the income of which is subject to U.S. federal income tax regardless of its source; or
•a trust that (a) is subject to the primary supervision of a court within the United States and the control of one or more U.S. persons for all substantial decisions or (b) has a valid election in effect under applicable U.S. Treasury Regulations to be treated as a U.S. person.
Non-U.S. Holders
Also, for purposes of this discussion, a “Non-U.S. Holder” is any beneficial owner of Subordinate Voting Shares who is neither a U.S. Holder nor an entity classified as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes.
Holders Subject to Special U.S. Federal Income Tax Rules Not Addressed
This summary does not address the U.S. federal income tax consequences of the ownership and disposition of Subordinate Voting Shares that are subject to special provisions under the Code, including holders that: (a) are tax-exempt organizations, qualified retirement plans, individual retirement accounts, or other tax-deferred accounts; (b) are financial institutions, underwriters, insurance companies, real estate investment trusts, or regulated investment companies; (c) are broker-dealers, dealers, or traders in securities or currencies that elect to apply a mark-to-market accounting method; (d) have a “functional currency” other than the U.S. dollar; (e) own, Subordinate Voting Shares as part of a straddle, hedging transaction, conversion transaction, constructive sale, or other arrangement involving more than one position; (f) acquired Subordinate Voting Shares in connection with the exercise of employee stock options or otherwise as compensation for services; (g) hold Subordinate Voting Shares other than as a capital asset within the meaning of Section 1221 of the Code (generally, property held for investment purposes); (h) own, directly, indirectly, or by attribution, 5% or more, by voting power or value, of the outstanding Subordinate Voting Shares; (i) are required to accelerate the recognition of any item of gross income for U.S. federal income tax purposes with respect to Subordinate Voting Shares as a result of such item being taken into account in an applicable financial statement; (j) acquired Subordinate Voting Shares by gift or inheritance; (k) are certain former citizens or long-term residents of the United States; (l) are pension plans; (m) are integral parts or controlled entities of foreign sovereigns; or (n) are passive foreign investment companies and corporations that accumulate earnings to avoid U.S. federal income tax. Holders that are subject to special provisions under the Code, including those holders described immediately above, should consult their own tax advisors regarding all U.S. federal, U.S. state and local, and non-U.S. tax consequences relating to the ownership and disposition of Subordinate Voting Shares.
If an entity or arrangement that is classified as a partnership (including any other “pass-through” entity) for U.S. federal income tax purposes holds Subordinate Voting Shares, the U.S. federal income tax consequences to such partnership and the partners (or owners) of such partnership of participating in the ownership and disposition of Subordinate Voting Shares generally will depend on the activities of the partnership and the status of such partners (or owners). This summary does not address the tax consequences to any such partnership or partner (or owner). Partners (or owners) of entities and arrangements that are classified as partnerships for U.S. federal, U.S. state and local, and non-tax purposes should consult their own tax advisors regarding the U.S. federal income tax consequences of the ownership and disposition of Subordinate Voting Shares.
U.S. Tax Classification of Verano
Pursuant to Section 7874(b) of the Code and the U.S. Treasury Regulations promulgated thereunder, notwithstanding that Verano has been organized under Canadian law, solely for U.S. federal income tax purposes, Verano is classified as a U.S. domestic corporation. Accordingly, Verano will be subject to a number of significant and complicated U.S. federal income tax consequences as a result of being treated as a U.S. domestic corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes and will be subject to taxation both in Canada and the United States.
U.S. Tax Considerations Relevant to the Ownership and Disposition of Subordinate Voting Shares for U.S. Holders
Distributions
We do not currently anticipate paying distributions on our Subordinate Voting Shares. If Verano makes distributions with respect to a Subordinate Voting Share, the distributions generally will be treated as U.S. source dividends to a U.S. Holder of a Subordinate Voting Share to the extent of Verano’s current and accumulated earnings and profits as determined under U.S. federal income tax principles at the end of the tax year in which the distribution occurs. To the extent the distributions exceed Verano’s current and accumulated earnings and profits, the excess will be treated first as a tax-free return of capital to the extent of the U.S. Holder’s adjusted tax basis in the Subordinate Voting Share, and thereafter as gain from the sale or exchange of that Subordinate Voting Share. Corporate U.S. Holders may be entitled to claim the dividends-received deduction with respect to dividends paid on the Subordinate Voting Shares, and such dividends may constitute qualified dividend income to individual U.S. Holders, subject in each case to applicable restrictions and eligibility requirements.
Dividends on the Subordinate Voting Shares will not constitute foreign source income for U.S. foreign tax credit limitation purposes because Verano, even though organized as a Canadian corporation, will be treated as a U.S. corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes, as described above under “- U.S. Tax Classification of Verano.” Therefore, a U.S. Holder may not be able to claim a U.S. foreign tax credit for any Canadian tax unless the U.S. Holder has sufficient other foreign source income. However, if the U.S. Holder has not elected to credit other foreign taxes during the same taxable year, the U.S. Holder should be able to take a deduction for such Canadian tax.
Sale, Exchange or Other Taxable Disposition of Subordinate Voting Shares
Upon the sale or other taxable disposition of a Subordinate Voting Share, U.S. Holders generally will recognize capital gain or loss equal to the difference between the amount realized by such holders on the disposition and their adjusted tax basis in such Subordinate Voting Share. Such gain or loss generally will be long-term capital gain or loss if the U.S. Holder held, or is treated as having held, such Subordinate Voting Share for more than one year as of the time of disposition. Long-term capital gains of individuals are currently eligible for reduced rates of taxation. The deductibility of capital losses is subject to limitations.
To the extent a sale or other taxable disposition of the Subordinate Voting Shares by a U.S. Holder results in Canadian tax payable by the U.S. Holder, such U.S. Holder may not be able to claim a U.S. foreign tax credit for any Canadian tax unless the U.S. Holder has sufficient other foreign source income. However, if the U.S. Holder has not elected to credit other foreign taxes during the same taxable year, the U.S. Holder should be able to take a deduction for such Canadian tax.
U.S. Tax Considerations Relevant to the Ownership and Disposition of Subordinate Voting Shares for Non-U.S. Holders
Distributions
If Verano makes distributions with respect to a Subordinate Voting Share, the distributions generally will be treated as dividends to a Non-U.S. Holder of a Subordinate Voting Share to the extent of Verano’s current and accumulated earnings and profits as determined under U.S. federal income tax principles at the end of the tax year in which the distribution occurs. To the extent the distributions exceed Verano’s current and accumulated earnings and profits, the excess will be treated first as a tax-free return of capital to the extent of the Non-U.S. Holder’s adjusted tax basis in the Subordinate Voting Share, and thereafter as gain from the sale or exchange of that Subordinate Voting Share.
Gain from the sale or exchange a Subordinate Voting Share that is effectively connected with the conduct of a trade or business by a Non-U.S. Holder within the United States (and, if an applicable tax treaty so requires, is attributable to a U.S. permanent establishment or fixed base maintained by the Non-U.S. Holder) will be subject to tax at generally applicable U.S. federal income tax rates. A Non-U.S. Holder that is a foreign corporation may also be subject to an additional “branch profits tax” on any such gain at a 30% rate (or lower applicable treaty rate).
Gain recognized by a Non-U.S. Holder who is an individual present in the United States for 183 days or more in the taxable year of disposition, and who meets certain other conditions, generally will be subject to a flat 30% U.S. federal income tax. Non-U.S. Holders are urged to consult their own tax advisors regarding possible eligibility for benefits under income tax treaties and the availability of U.S. source capital losses to offset any such gain.
Dividends paid to a Non-U.S. Holder generally will be subject to U.S. withholding tax at a rate of 30% of the gross amount unless the Non-U.S. Holder is eligible for and properly claims a reduced rate of withholding under an applicable income tax treaty. However, dividends that are effectively connected with the conduct of a trade or business by the Non-U.S. Holder within the United States (and, if required by an applicable income tax treaty, are attributable to a U.S. permanent establishment of the Non-U.S. Holder) will not be subject to U.S. withholding tax, unless Verano is classified as a USRPHC, provided certain certification and disclosure requirements are satisfied. Instead, such dividends are subject to U.S. federal income tax on a net income basis in the same manner as if the Non-U.S. Holder were a U.S. Holder. Any such effectively connected dividends received by a foreign corporation may be subject to an additional “branch profits tax” equal to 30% of its effectively connected earnings and profits (subject to certain adjustments) or at such lower rate as may be specified by an applicable income tax treaty. A Non-U.S. Holder eligible for a reduced rate of U.S. withholding tax pursuant to an income tax treaty may obtain a refund of any excess amounts withheld by timely filing an appropriate claim for refund with the IRS.
Verano believes that it presently is not a USRPHC and it does not presently anticipate that it will become a USRPHC. However, if Verano is treated as a USRPHC, gain recognized by such holder on the sale, taxable exchange or other disposition of Subordinate Voting Shares will be subject to tax at generally applicable U.S. federal income tax rates if Verano is or has been a USRPHC for U.S. federal income tax purposes at any time during the shorter of the five-year period ending on the date of disposition or the period that the Non-U.S. Holder held the Subordinate Voting Shares, and, in the case where the Subordinate Voting Shares are regularly traded on an established securities market, the Non-U.S. Holder has owned, directly or constructively, more than 5% of Subordinate Voting Shares at any time within the shorter of the five-year period preceding the disposition or such Non-U.S. Holder’s holding period for the Subordinate Voting Shares. There can be no assurance that the Subordinate Voting Shares will be treated as regularly traded on an established securities market for this purpose. In addition, Verano may be required to withhold U.S. income tax at a rate of 15% of the amount realized upon such disposition. You are urged to consult your own tax advisors regarding the application of these rules.
Sale, Exchange or Other Taxable Disposition of Subordinate Voting Shares
A Non-U.S. Holder that disposes of its Subordinate Voting Shares in a taxable disposition generally will subject to the tax treatment described above in “- U.S. Tax Considerations Relevant to the Ownership and Disposition of Subordinate Voting Shares for Non-U.S. Holders - Distributions”.
Foreign Account Tax Compliance Withholding
Under the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (“FATCA”), a 30% withholding tax may apply to payments of dividends on stock made to foreign financial institutions (including amounts paid to a foreign financial institution on behalf of a holder) and certain other non-financial foreign entities. Additionally, a 30% withholding tax may apply to payments of gross proceeds from the disposition of stock made to such institutions and entities; however, proposed Treasury Regulations eliminate this 30% withholding tax on payments of gross proceeds. Taxpayers may rely on these proposed Treasury Regulations until final Treasury Regulations are issued. There can be no assurance that final Treasury Regulations would provide an exemption from FATCA for gross proceeds.
Withholding under FATCA generally will not apply where such payments are made to (i) a foreign financial institution that undertakes, under either an agreement with the United States Treasury or pursuant to an intergovernmental agreement between the jurisdiction in which it is a resident and the United States Treasury, to identify accounts held by certain United States persons or United States-owned foreign entities, annually report certain information about such accounts, and withhold 30% on payments to noncompliant foreign financial institutions and certain other account holders; (ii) a non-financial foreign entity that either certifies it does not have any substantial United States owners or furnishes identifying information regarding each substantial United States owner to the United States Treasury; or (iii) a foreign financial institution or non-financial foreign entity that is exempt from these rules. Investors should consult their tax advisors regarding this legislation and the regulations thereunder.
Information Reporting and Backup Withholding
Payments of dividends or of proceeds on the disposition of Subordinate Voting Shares to U.S. Holders may be subject to information reporting and backup withholding unless the U.S. Holder (i) is a corporation or comes within certain other exempt categories and demonstrates this fact, or (ii) provides a correct taxpayer identification number, certifies as to no loss of exemption from backup withholding and otherwise complies with applicable requirements of the backup withholding rules. Non-U.S. Holders may be required to provide documentary evidence establishing they are not subject to information reporting and backup withholding. Payments of dividends to Non-U.S. Holders and the amount of U.S. federal withholding tax imposed on such dividends must generally be reported annually to the IRS. A similar report will be sent to Non-U.S. Holders. Copies of these reports may be made available to tax authorities in a holder’s country of residence.
Backup withholding is not an additional tax. Any amounts withheld under the backup withholding rules will be allowed as a refund or a credit against a holder’s U.S. federal income tax liability, provided the required information is furnished to the IRS on a timely basis.

---

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
ITEM 6. [RESERVED]

---

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
This discussion contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results could differ materially from those projected, forecasted, or expected in these forward-looking statements as a result of various factors, including, but not limited to, those discussed below and elsewhere in this Form 10-K. See “Cautionary Note on Forward-Looking Statements” and “Risk Factors” in this Form 10-K. Our management believes the assumptions underlying the Company’s financial statements and accompanying notes are reasonable. However, the Company’s financial statements and accompanying notes may not be an indication of our financial condition and results of operations in the future. We have omitted discussion of the earliest of the three years covered by our consolidated financial statements presented in this report because that disclosure was already included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023, filed with the SEC on March 15, 2024. You are encouraged to reference Part II, Item 7, within that report, for a discussion of our financial condition and result of operations for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022 compared to the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023.
This management discussion and analysis (this “MD&A”) of the financial condition and results of operations of Verano is for the years ended December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023. It is supplemental to, and should be read in conjunction with, the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes for the years ended December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023. The financial statements referenced in this MD&A are prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Financial information presented in this MD&A is presented in United States dollars (“$” or “US$”) and expressed in thousands, unless otherwise indicated.
OVERVIEW OF THE COMPANY
Verano, one of the U.S. cannabis industry’s leading companies based on historical revenue, geographical scope and brand performance, is a vertically integrated, multi-state operator embracing a mission of saying Yes to plan progress and the bold exploration of cannabis. An operator of licensed cannabis cultivation, processing, wholesale distribution and retail facilities, our goal is the ongoing development of communal wellness by providing responsible access to regulated medical and adult use cannabis products to discerning customers. As of February 25, 2025, through our subsidiaries and affiliates we operate businesses in 13 states, including 153 retail dispensaries and 15 cultivation and processing facilities with over 1.1 million square feet of cultivation capacity. We produce a wide variety of high quality cannabis products sold under our portfolio of consumer brands, including Encore™, Avexia™, MÜV™, Savvy™, (the) Essence™, BITS™ and Verano™. We also design, build and operate branded retail environments including Zen Leaf™ and MÜV™ dispensaries that deliver a cannabis shopping experience in both medical and adult use markets.
Notwithstanding the permissive regulatory environment of medical, and in some cases, also adult use (i.e., recreational) cannabis, at the state level, it remains illegal under U.S. federal law to cultivate, manufacture, distribute, sell or possess cannabis in the U.S. Because federal law prohibits transporting any federally restricted substance across state lines, cannabis cannot be transported across state lines. As a result of current federal law prohibitions, the U.S. cannabis industry is conducted on a state-by-state basis. To date, in the U.S. 38 states plus the District of Columbia and the U.S. territories of Puerto Rico, Guam, the Commonwealth of Northern Marina Islands, and the U.S. Virgin Islands have authorized comprehensive medical cannabis programs, 24 states plus the District of Columbia and the U.S. territories of Guam, the Commonwealth of Northern Mariana Islands, and the U.S. Virgin Islands have authorized comprehensive programs for medical and adult use (i.e. recreational) cannabis, and 7 states allow the use of low tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and high cannabidiol (CBD) products for specified medical uses. Verano operates within states where cannabis use, medical or both medical and adult use, has been approved by state and local regulatory bodies. Strict compliance with state and local laws with respect to cannabis may neither absolve the Company of liability under U.S. federal law, nor may it provide a defense to any federal proceeding which may be brought against the Company or any of its subsidiaries.
Our strategy is to vertically integrate as a single cohesive company in multiple states through the consolidation of seed-to-sale cultivating, manufacturing, distributing, and dispensing cannabis brands and products at scale. Our cultivation, processing and wholesale distribution of cannabis consumer packaged goods are designed to guarantee shelf-space in our national retail dispensary chains, as well as to develop and foster long term wholesale supply relationships with third-party retail operators. Our model includes geographic diversity by establishing a footprint to allow us to adapt to changes in both industry and market conditions.
As part of the Go Public Transactions described in “Item 1. Business - History of the Company,” in February 2021, the Company resulted from a reverse takeover transaction.
SELECTED RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following presents selected financial data derived from the audited consolidated financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023. The selected consolidated financial information below may not be indicative of the Company’s future performance.
Year Ended December 31, 2024, as Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2023
For the Years Ended December 31,
($ in thousands) 2024 2023 $ Change
Revenues, net of Discounts $ 878,585 $ 938,452 $ (59,867)
Gross Profit 443,931 475,206 (31,275)
Net Loss attributable to Verano Holdings Corp. & Subsidiaries (341,859) (117,348) (224,511)
Net Loss per share - basic & diluted $ (0.98) $ (0.34) $ (0.64)
Revenues, net of Discounts
Revenues, net of discounts for the year ended December 31, 2024 was $878,585, a decrease of $(59,867) or (6.4)%, compared to revenues, net of discounts of $938,452 for the year ended December 31, 2023. The year-over-year decrease in revenues, net of discounts, that the Company experienced was caused by a decrease in retail revenues, net of discounts, which was driven primarily by continued expected declines in New Jersey and Illinois retail markets as third-party dispensaries continue to open across the states during the year ended December 31, 2024. Additionally, revenues, net of discounts, in the Florida market decreased year-over year due to cultivation and process facility enhancements that temporarily reduced production. This is partially offset by increases in revenues, net of discounts, from the Maryland and Ohio markets in relation to the adult use program launches in July 2023 and August 2024, respectively, and acquisition activity during the year ended December 31, 2024. During the year ended December 31, 2024, the Company opened nine new retail stores, one in Connecticut, six in Florida, one in New Jersey and one in Pennsylvania. Additionally, the Company acquired eight additional retail stores, two in Arizona and six in Virginia, as part of acquisition activity during the third quarter of 2024. Consistent with other multi-state cannabis operators, the Company has continued to see increased competition and promotional activity in select retail markets, specifically in New Jersey and Illinois during the year ended December 31, 2024 compared to the year ended December 31, 2023. Retail revenues, net of discounts, for the year ended December 31, 2024 comprised 65.5% of revenues, net of discounts, compared to 68.0% of revenues, net of discounts, for the year ended December 31, 2023, excluding intersegment eliminations. The Company experienced an increase in cultivation (wholesale) revenues, net of discounts, driven by increased third-party wholesale sales in the New Jersey and Illinois markets, coupled with the adult use launch in the Ohio market, both of which attributed to increased production output and sales of cannabis flower and cannabis related products, when comparing the year ended December 31, 2024 to the year ended December 31, 2023. Cultivation (wholesale) revenues, net of discounts, made up 34.5% of revenues, net of discounts for the year ended December 31, 2024, as compared to 32.0% for the year ended December 31, 2023, excluding intersegment eliminations. Please see “Results of Operations by Segment” for information regarding year over year performance of our retail revenue and cultivation (wholesale) revenues.
Gross Profit
Gross profit for the year ended December 31, 2024 was $443,931, representing a gross profit margin of 50.5%. This is compared to gross profit for the year ended December 31, 2023 of $475,206, representing a 50.6% gross profit margin. The slight decrease was attributable to an impact related to an inventory step-up from acquisitions, coupled with, continued pricing pressure during the year ended December 31, 2024 when compared to the year ended December 31, 2023.
Net Loss
Net Loss attributable to Verano Holdings Corp. and its Subsidiaries, or the Company for purposes of this “Management’s Discussion and Analysis”, for the year ended December 31, 2024, was $(341,859) an increase of $224,511, compared to a Net Loss of $(117,348) for the year ended December 31, 2023. The increase in Net Loss year-over-year was largely attributable to intangible asset impairment charges of (i) $293,688 related to the Company’s Pennsylvania retail licenses, (ii) $5,687 related to the Company’s Arizona cultivation (wholesale) tradenames, (iii) $34 related to the Company’s Maryland retail tradenames; and (iv) $425 related to the Company’s Arizona cultivation (wholesale) technology, on the remaining net book value during the year ended December 31, 2024. Additionally, during the year ended December 31, 2024, the Company recorded (i) a fixed asset impairment charge of $10,526 associated with an Arizona cultivation facility, (ii) an impairment on a held-for-sale asset related to a cultivation facility in Pennsylvania of $9,160 as the carrying value exceeded the fair value less cost to sell by such amount; and (iii) a goodwill impairment charge of $8,179 associated with its Arizona cultivation (wholesale) reporting unit. This is partially offset by lower provision for income taxes for the year ended December 31, 2024, when compared to the year ended December 31, 2023.
For the Years Ended December 31,
($ in thousands) 2024 2023 $ Change
Cost of Goods Sold, net $ 434,654 $ 463,246 $ (28,592)
Selling, General, and Administrative Expenses 353,408 331,928 21,480
Loss on Impairment of Investment in Associates - 6,571 (6,571)
Loss on Impairment of Intangibles - Goodwill 8,179 37,931 (29,752)
Loss on Impairment of Intangibles & Fixed Assets 319,520 13,686 $ 305,834
Other Income (Expense), net (62,739) (56,986) (5,753)
Provision for Income Taxes (41,944) (145,146) 103,202
Cost of Goods Sold, net
Cost of goods sold, net includes the costs directly attributable to cultivating and processing cannabis and for retail purchases of finished goods, such as flower, edibles, and concentrates. Cost of goods sold, net, for the year ended December 31, 2024 was $434,654, a decrease of $(28,592) or (6.2)%, from the year ended December 31, 2023. The decrease was primarily driven by a decline in revenues, net of discounts, within the retail markets due to expected declines in the New Jersey and Illinois markets as third-party dispensaries continue to open across the states, driving increased competition. Additionally, the Company recorded a $3,846 non-cash impact related to the inventory step-up from acquisitions during the year ended December 31, 2024.
Selling, General, and Administrative Expenses
Selling, general and administrative expenses (“SG&A”) for the year ended December 31, 2024 were $353,408, an increase of $21,480 or 6.5%, compared to selling, general and administrative expenses of $331,928 for the year ended December 31, 2023. SG&A expenses as a percentage of revenues, net of discounts, was 40.2% and 35.4% for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. The year over year increase was attributable to a $9,350 increase in general and administrative expenses driven by enhancements in processes and technology and a $13,876 increase in salaries and benefits due to increased headcounts related to new store openings and acquisition activity for the year ended December 31, 2024.
Loss on Impairment of Investment in Associates
During the year ended December 31, 2023, the Company received notification that the DGV Group, LLC ("DGV"), an entity in which the Company held an equity interest, was permanently ceasing operations. The Company recorded an impairment loss for the full value of the equity method investment of $6,571 as DGV was previously held as an Investment in Associates on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets. No such impairment charges were recorded during the year ended December 31, 2024.
Loss on Impairment of Intangibles - Goodwill, License & Fixed Assets
During the year ended December 31, 2024, the Company recorded intangible asset impairment charges of (i) $293,688 related to the Company’s Pennsylvania retail licenses, (ii) $5,687 related to the Company’s Arizona cultivation (wholesale) tradenames, (iii) $34 related to the Company’s Maryland retail tradenames; and (iv) $425 related to the Company’s Arizona cultivation (wholesale) technology, on the remaining net book value during the year ended December 31, 2024. Additionally, during the year ended December 31, 2024, the Company recorded (i) a fixed asset impairment charge of $10,526 associated with an Arizona cultivation facility, (ii) an impairment on a held-for-sale asset related to a cultivation facility in Pennsylvania of $9,160 as the carrying value exceeded the fair value less cost to sell by such amount; and (iii) a goodwill impairment charge of $8,179 associated with its Arizona cultivation (wholesale) reporting unit. During the year ended December 31, 2023, the Company recorded an intangible asset impairment charge of $5,113 on the remaining net book value related to the Company’s Massachusetts cultivation (wholesale) license, a fixed asset impairment charge of $8,573 related to the Company’s Massachusetts cultivation facility, and goodwill impairment charges of (i) $33,622 associated with its Arizona cultivation (wholesale) reporting unit, (ii) $4,245 associated with its Nevada retail reporting unit, and (iii) $64 associated with its Massachusetts cultivation (wholesale) reporting unit, as the carrying values of the reporting units exceeded the estimated fair value by such amounts.
Other Income (Expense), net
Other income (expense), net for the year ended December 31, 2024 was $(62,739), an increase of $5,753, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2023. The increase in other income (expense), net, during the year ended December 31, 2024 was mainly due to a loss on debt extinguishment attributable to the Permitted Partial Optional Prepayment under the 2022 Credit Agreement and the Company's contributions to Florida's Smart & Safe adult-use legalization campaign when compared to December 31, 2023.
Provision for Income Taxes
Provision for income taxes for the year ended December 31, 2024 was $41,944, a decrease of $103,202 or 71.1% as compared to the year ended December 31, 2023. The increase in income taxes was largely attributable to the Loss on Impairment of Intangibles & Fixed Assets for the year ended December 31, 2023.
Results of Operations by Segment
The Company has two reportable segments: (i) cultivation (wholesale) and (ii) retail. Due to the vertically integrated nature of our business, the Company reviews revenue at the cultivation (wholesale) and retail levels while reviewing operating results on a consolidated basis.
The following tables summarize revenues, net of discounts, by segment for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023:
For the Years Ended December 31,
($ in thousands) 2024 2023 $ Change % Change
Revenues, net of Discounts
Cultivation (Wholesale) $ 353,476 $ 348,990 4,486 1.3 %
Retail 672,252 741,334 (69,082) (9.3) %
Intersegment Eliminations (147,143) (151,872) 4,729 (3.1) %
Total Revenues, net of Discounts $ 878,585 $ 938,452 $ (59,867) (6.4) %
Revenues, net of discounts, for the cultivation (wholesale) segment was $353,476 for the year ended December 31, 2024, an increase of $4,486 or 1.3%, excluding intersegment eliminations, compared to the year ended December 31, 2023. The increase in cultivation (wholesale) revenues, net of discounts, was driven by increased third-party wholesale sales in the New Jersey and Illinois markets, coupled with the adult use launch in the Ohio market, both, of which attributed to increased production output and sales of cannabis flower and cannabis related products, when comparing the year ended December 31, 2024 to the year ended December 31, 2023. Additionally, the wholesale market experienced a strategic shift in third-party distribution, specifically in Connecticut and Pennsylvania market, with growing emphasis on vertical distribution channels through direct retail dispensaries.
Revenues, net of discounts, for the retail segment was $672,252 for the year ended December 31, 2024, a decrease of $(69,082) or (9.3)%, excluding intersegment eliminations, compared to the year ended December 31, 2023. Top contributors to retail sales were mainly due to increases in Maryland and Ohio retail markets due to the adult use program launches in July 2023 and August 2024, respectively, and acquisition activity during the year ended December 31, 2024. The overall decrease in retail revenues, net of discounts, was primarily driven by continued increased competition and promotional activity, as expected, in select retail markets, specifically in New Jersey and Illinois. Additionally, modest pricing pressure and promotional activity contributed to the decrease in revenues, net of discounts, when comparing the year ended December 31, 2024 to the year ended December 31, 2023.
Drivers of Operational Performance
Revenue
The Company derives its revenue from both its cultivation (wholesale) business in which it cultivates, produces and sells cannabis products to third-party retail customers, and its retail business, in which it directly sells cannabis products to retail patients and consumers. For the year ended December 31, 2024, approximately 34.5% of the Company’s revenue was generated from the cultivation (wholesale) business and approximately 65.5% from the retail business, excluding intersegment eliminations. For the year ended December 31, 2023, approximately 32.0% of revenue was generated from the cultivation (wholesale) business and approximately 68.0% from the retail business, excluding intersegment eliminations.
Gross Profit
Gross profit is revenue less cost of goods sold, net. Cost of goods sold includes the costs directly attributable to product sales and includes amounts paid for finished goods, such as flower, edibles, and concentrates, as well as packaging and other supplies, fees for services and processing, rent, utilities, and related costs. Cannabis costs are affected by various state regulations that limit the sourcing and procurement of cannabis product, which may create fluctuations in gross profit over comparative periods as the regulatory environment changes. Gross profit margin measures the Company’s gross profit as a percentage of revenue.
The Company’s expansion strategy and revenue growth have taken priority and will continue to do so for the foreseeable future as it expands its footprint, by exploring new markets and opening or acquiring new dispensary locations, and scales production within certain markets. In the core markets in which the Company is already operational and, as the state markets mature, the Company anticipates that there will be pressure on margins in the cultivation (wholesale) and retail channels. The Company’s current production capacity has not been fully realized and it is expected that price compression at the cultivation (wholesale) level, will be partially offset by operational optimization.
Total Expenses
Total expenses other than the cost of goods sold consist of selling costs to support customer relationships and to deliver product to the Company’s retail stores. It also includes a significant investment in the corporate infrastructure required to support ongoing business.
Selling costs generally correlate to revenue. As a percentage of sales, selling costs are expected to increase slightly in currently operational markets as facility and market expansion occurs. The increase is expected to be driven primarily by the growth of the Company’s retail and cultivation (wholesale) channels and the ramp up from new retail openings.
SG&A expenses also include costs incurred at the Company’s corporate offices, primarily related to back-office personnel costs, including salaries, incentive compensation, benefits, stock-based compensation and professional service costs. Going forward, SG&A expenses are expected to continue in line with the Company’s expansion plans. Furthermore, the Company expects to continue to incur acquisition and transaction costs related to these expansion plans and anticipates an increase in stock compensation expenses related to recruiting and hiring talent, along with legal and professional fees associated with being a public-reporting company and publicly traded in Canada and a public-reporting company in the U.S.
Provision for Income Taxes
The Company is subject to income taxes in the jurisdictions in which it operates and, consequently, income tax expense is a function of the allocation of taxable income by jurisdiction and the various activities that impact the timing of taxable events. As the Company operates in the cannabis industry, it is subject to the limits of Section 280E of the Code under which the Company is only allowed to deduct expenses directly related to the sale of products. This results in permanent differences between ordinary and necessary business expenses deemed non-allowable under Section 280E of the Code and a higher effective tax rate than most industries. The Company has taken a position that it does not owe taxes attributable to the application of Section 280E of the Code.
During the second quarter of 2023, Connecticut, Illinois, and New Jersey enacted tax legislation to exempt, or decouple, from Section 280E of the Code, all of which became retroactively effective as of January 1, 2023. The Company has significant operations in these states and is now permitted to deduct ordinary and necessary cannabis business expenses in these states.
LIQUIDITY, FINANCING ACTIVITIES AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
As of December 31, 2024 and 2023, the Company had total current liabilities of $197,968 and $412,188, respectively, and had cash and cash equivalents of $87,796 and $174,760, respectively, to meet its current obligations. The Company had working capital of $159,541 and a working capital deficit of $(17,992), for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. This increase in working capital of $177,533 for the year ended December 31, 2024 when compared to the year ended December 31, 2023, was primarily driven by the Company’s position that it does not owe taxes attributable to the application of Section 280E of the Code, thus reducing its Income Taxes Payable balance on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
The Company generates cash from revenues and deploys its capital to acquire and develop assets capable of producing additional revenues and earnings over both the immediate and long term. Capital is primarily being utilized for capital expenditures, facility improvements, strategic investment opportunities, product development and marketing, as well as customer, supplier, and investor and industry relations. The Company takes a cautious approach in allocating its capital to maximize its returns while ensuring appropriate liquidity. Given inflation and the uncertainty of the future economic environment, the Company has taken additional measures in monitoring and deploying its capital to minimize the potentially negative impact on its operations and expansion plans.
Liquidity Requirements
Our short-term liquidity requirements consist primarily of funds necessary to pay for our acquisitions, to repay borrowings, maintain our operations and other general business needs. We believe that internally generated funds and other sources of liquidity discussed below will be sufficient to meet working capital needs, capital expenditures, and other business requirements for at least the next 12 months. We believe we will meet known or reasonably likely future cash requirements through the combination of cash generated from operating activities, available cash balances and available borrowings. If these sources of liquidity need to be augmented, additional cash requirements would likely be financed through the issuance of equity securities or additional borrowings; however, there can be no assurances that we will be able to obtain additional equity financing or debt financing on acceptable terms, or on terms similar to our existing financings, in the future.
Our long-term liquidity requirements consist primarily of completing additional acquisitions, scheduled debt payments and future payments of income tax payables, maintaining and expanding our operations and other general business needs. We expect to meet our long-term liquidity requirements through various sources of capital, which may include future debt or equity issuances, net cash provided by operations and other secured and unsecured borrowings. We believe that the foregoing sources of capital will provide sufficient funds for our operations, anticipated expansion and scheduled debt payments for the long-term. Our ability to fund our operating needs will depend on our future ability to continue to generate positive cash flow from operations and our ability to obtain debt or equity financing on acceptable terms.
Credit Facility
In October 2022, Verano and certain of its subsidiaries and affiliates, as the Borrowers, entered into the 2022 Credit Agreement with the lenders party thereto, pursuant to which the lenders advanced the Borrowers a $350,000 senior secured term loan, and which also provides the Borrowers with the right, subject to conditions, to request an additional incremental term loan of up to $100,000; provided that the lenders elect to fund such incremental term loan. At funding, the proceeds of the loans made under the 2022 Credit Agreement were used to repay the amounts owing under the Company's previous senior secured term loan credit facility. In connection with such repayment, such previous credit facility was terminated and is no longer in force or effect.
The 2022 Credit Agreement allows the Borrowers to (i) incur up to $120,000 of additional indebtedness from third-party lenders secured by real estate excluded as collateral under the 2022 Credit Agreement, (ii) incur additional mortgage financing from third-party lenders secured by real estate acquired after the initial funding of the 2022 Credit Agreement, and (iii) upon the SAFE Banking Act or similar legislation making banking services available to U.S. cannabis companies being passed by the United States Congress, incur up to $50,000 under a revolving credit facility from third-party lenders that is pari passu or subordinated to the 2022 Credit Agreement obligations, all of which are subject to customary conditions.
The obligations under the 2022 Credit Agreement are secured by substantially all of the assets of the Borrowers, excluding vehicles, specified parcels of real estate and other customary exclusions. The 2022 Credit Agreement provides for a floating annual interest rate equal to the prime rate then in effect plus 6.50%, which rate may be increased by 3.00% upon an event of default that is not a material event of default or 6.00% upon a material event of default as provided in the 2022 Credit Agreement. The initially funded $350,000 loan requires scheduled amortization payments of $350 per month beginning in October 2023 with the remaining principal balance due in full on October 30, 2026.
At any time, the Borrowers may voluntarily prepay up to $100,000 of the principal balance, subject to a one-time $1,000 prepayment premium upon the first prepayment, and may prepay the remaining outstanding principal balance for a prepayment premium at varying rates based on the timing of any subsequent prepayments. The Borrowers may not voluntarily prepay more than $100,000 of the principal balance without prepaying the entire outstanding principal balance of the loan.
On April 30, 2024, the Company, made a Permitted Partial Optional Prepayment (as defined in the 2022 Credit Agreement) in the amount of $50,000 pursuant to the 2022 Credit Agreement and paid a $1,000 prepayment premium in connection therewith.
In connection with such Permitted Partial Optional Prepayment, Chicago Atlantic and certain Lenders agreed to (a) release the Released Borrowers from their obligations under, and as parties to, the 2022 Credit Agreement and related agreements and (b) release all liens over the Released Borrowers’ property, including real estate, held by Chicago Atlantic for the benefit of the Lenders, in each case, pursuant to a limited consent and waiver, dated as of April 29, 2024, by and among the Borrowers, certain of the Lenders party thereto and Chicago Atlantic.
The 2022 Credit Agreement includes customary representations, warranties and covenants and customary events of default, including payment defaults, breaches of representations and warranties, covenant defaults, cross-defaults to material indebtedness, and events of bankruptcy and insolvency.
The 2022 Credit Agreement also includes customary negative covenants limiting the Borrowers’ ability to incur additional indebtedness and grant liens, and the ability to enter into definitive documents or consummate acquisitions or dispositions that are not otherwise permitted thereunder, among others. Additionally, the 2022 Credit Agreement requires the Borrowers to meet financial tests regarding minimum cash balances, minimum levels of Adjusted EBITDA (as defined in the 2022 Credit Agreement) and a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio.
As of December 31, 2024, the Company was in compliance with such covenants.
George Archos, the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, participated in the 2022 Credit Agreement as a lender funding $1,000 of the $350,000 principal amount. Mr. Archos is excluded from certain approval rights of the lenders and any penalties and fees due to Mr. Archos under the 2022 Credit Agreement are immaterial to the Company.
Mortgage Loans
On May 14, 2021, the Company acquired The Healing Center, LLC (“The Healing Center”), which consisted of three dispensaries in the greater Pittsburgh area. The Healing Center leased the real estate where the dispensaries are located from three separate real estate entities (collectively referred to as “THC Real Estate”) and on September 3, 2021, the Company acquired the THC Real Estate. The Company funded the acquisition of the THC Real Estate through a credit facility with Chicago Atlantic Credit Company for $12,650 and interest of 9.75% per annum. This loan has been paid in full and is no longer outstanding as of December 31, 2023.
On June 29, 2022, the Company entered into a real estate loan with a community bank to borrow a principal amount of $18,000 secured by real estate and improvements thereon in Branchburg, New Jersey. The mortgage bears an interest rate of 4% and matures in July 2047.
On March 9, 2023, the Company entered into a real estate loan with a community bank to borrow a principal amount of $20,000 secured by real estate and improvements thereon in Rocky Hill, Connecticut. The loan bears an interest rate of 5.75% and matures in March 2028, and may be extended for four additional five-year periods.
On September 29, 2023, the Company entered into a real estate loan with a community bank to borrow a principal amount of $14,500 secured by real estate in Chester, Pennsylvania. The loan bears an interest rate of 7.5% and matures in October 2028.
2023 Loan Agreement
On December 26, 2023, a subsidiary of the Company, as the borrower (“Loan Agreement Borrower”), entered into a Loan Agreement (the “Loan Agreement”), with First Federal Bank (“Loan Agreement Lender”). The Loan Agreement Borrower’s obligations under the Loan Agreement is guaranteed by the Company and another subsidiary of the Company.
Pursuant to the Loan Agreement, $27,999 in principal was funded which is being repaid in 60 monthly installment payments based on a 300-month amortization schedule, with a balloon payment upon maturity. All unpaid principal and interest is due in full on December 26, 2028.
The obligations under the Loan Agreement are secured by a mortgage on real property located in Apollo Beach, Florida and owned by the Loan Agreement Borrower, together with certain other limited assets of Loan Agreement Borrower related to such real property.
The Loan Agreement provides for a fixed annual interest rate of 8.34%, which interest rate may be increased by 2% if an event of default occurs; provided, that certain events of default allow the Loan Agreement Lender to declare all outstanding principal immediately due, in which case all unpaid principal will accrue interest at 18% per annum thereafter.
The Loan Agreement further provides the Loan Agreement Borrower with the right to prepay all or any portion of the outstanding principal balance with prepayment rates ranging from 0-2% of the principal amount prepaid, depending on when such prepayment occurs.
The Loan Agreement includes customary representations and warranties and events of default, including, without limitation, payment defaults, breaches of representations and warranties, covenant defaults, cross-defaults to other indebtedness, and events of bankruptcy and insolvency, among others.
Tax Liabilities
The Company has U.S. income tax payable liabilities. These income tax payable liabilities will require payment from our liquidity sources, and we believe we have sufficient liquidity for both short-term and long-term payments of our income tax payable liabilities and in addition to our other obligations. The Company expects to retain additional cash from operations, due in part to the Company's treatment of Section 280E of the Code as not applying to limit its deduction of ordinary and necessary business expenses.
Sources and Uses of Cash
Cash Provided by (Used in) Operating Activities, Investing and Financing Activities
Net cash provided by (used in) operating, investing, and financing activities for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023, 2022, were as follows:
For the Years Ended December 31,
2024 2023 2022
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities $ 112,195 $ 109,710 $ 94,347
Net Cash Used In Investing Activities (133,251) (34,150) (207,851)
Net Cash Provided By (Used In) Financing Activities (65,926) 14,354 99,245
Cash Flows from Operating Activities. Cash flow generated from operating activities provides us with a significant source of liquidity. Our cash flows from operating activities result from cash received from our customers, offset by cash payments we make for products and services, operational costs, and income taxes. The $2,485 incease was driven by an increase in inventory attributable to acquisition activity during the year ended December 31, 2024, when compared to the year ended December 31, 2023.
Cash Flows from Investing Activities. Cash used in investing activities increased by $99,101 which was attributable to an increase in capital expenditures of $62,718 for the year ended December 31, 2024 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2023, in addition to acquisition activity during the year ended December 31, 2024.
Cash Flows from Financing Activities. Cash provided by financing activities during the year ended December 31, 2024 was largely attributable to the Permitted Partial Optional Prepayment under the 2022 Credit Agreement during the year ended December 31, 2024 when compared to the year ended December 31, 2023.
The Company expects capital expenditures for 2025 to be between $25,000 and $40,000. The Company expects its capital expenditures in 2025 will be focused on efficiency initiatives at cultivation facilities in existing markets, targeting expansion of our retail footprint and improvements in our technology systems infrastructure.
Changes in or Adoption of Accounting Practices
Refer to the discussion of recently adopted/issued accounting pronouncements within the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 2 - Significant Accounting Policies.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES
The preparation of the Company’s consolidated financial statements requires management to make judgments, estimates and assumptions that affect the application of policies and reported amounts of assets and liabilities, and revenue and expenses. Actual results may differ from these estimates. The estimates and underlying assumptions are reviewed by the Company on an ongoing basis. Revisions to accounting estimates are recognized in the period in which the estimate is revised if the revision affects only that period or in the period of the revision and future periods if the review affects both current and future periods. Significant judgments, estimates, and assumptions that have the most significant effect on the amounts recognized in the consolidated financial statements are described below.
Goodwill and Indefinite-lived Intangible Asset Impairment
Goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets are evaluated for impairment annually during the fourth quarter, or more frequently if an event occurs or circumstances change that could more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit or indefinite-lived intangible asset below its carrying value. In performing our annual goodwill impairment test, we may start with an optional qualitative assessment as allowed for under the accounting guidance. As part of the qualitative assessment, we evaluate all events and circumstances, including both positive and negative events, in their totality, to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. If we bypass the qualitative assessment, or if the qualitative assessment indicates that a quantitative analysis should be performed, we perform a quantitative test for impairment. As part of the Company’s quantitative impairment analysis, the fair value of a reporting unit or indefinite-lived intangible asset is generally determined using both the income and market approaches. The income approach requires management to estimate a number of factors for each reporting unit or indefinite-lived intangible asset, including projected future operating results, economic projections, anticipated future cash flows and discount rates. The market approach estimates fair value using comparable marketplace fair value data from within a comparable industry grouping, as well as recent guideline transactions.
The determination of the fair value of the reporting units or indefinite-lived intangible assets requires the Company to make significant estimates and assumptions with respect to the business and financial performance of the Company’s reporting units or indefinite-lived intangible assets. These estimates and assumptions primarily include, but are not limited to: the selection of appropriate peer group companies, control premiums appropriate for acquisitions in the industries in which we compete, discount rates, terminal growth rates, forecasts of revenue, operating income, depreciation, amortization, working capital requirements and capital expenditures. With regard to the Company’s goodwill reporting units, the Company also compares the sum of estimated fair values of reporting units to the Company’s fair value as implied by the market value of its equity. This comparison provides an indication that, in total, assumptions and estimates are reasonable. Future declines in the overall market value of the Company’s equity securities may provide an indication that the fair value of one or more reporting units has declined below its carrying value.
Although the Company believes its estimates of fair value are reasonable, actual financial results could differ from those estimates due to the inherent uncertainty involved in making such estimates. Changes in assumptions concerning future financial results or other underlying assumptions, could have a significant impact on either the fair value of the reporting units and indefinite-lived intangibles, the amount of any goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible impairment charges, or both. These estimates can be affected by a number of factors including, but not limited to, general economic conditions, availability of market information as well as the Company's profitability. The Company continues to monitor these potential impacts and economic, industry and market trends, and the impact these may have on the reporting units or indefinite-lived intangible assets.
Finite-Lived Intangible Assets and Other Long-lived Assets
The Company evaluates the recoverability of finite-lived intangible assets and other long-lived assets whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of such an asset may not be recoverable. The evaluation of finite-lived intangible assets and other long-lived assets is performed at the lowest level of identifiable cash flows.
If the asset group fails the recoverability test, then an impairment charge is determined based on the difference between the fair value of the asset group compared to its carrying value. The fair value of the long-lived assets included in an impaired asset group may be determined using an income, market, or cost approach, or a combination thereof. The income approach utilizes assumptions including management’s best estimates of the expected future cash flows and the estimated useful life of the asset group. The cost approach utilizes assumptions for the current replacement costs of similar assets adjusted for estimated depreciation and deterioration of the existing equipment and economic obsolescence. The market approach requires the use of judgment in evaluating market comparable assets.
The determination of the fair value of the asset group requires management to estimate a number of factors including anticipated future cash flows, discount rates, and the identification of market comparable assets. Although we believe these estimates are reasonable, actual results could differ from those estimates due to the inherent uncertainty involved in making such estimates.
Business Combinations
In a business combination, all identifiable assets, liabilities and contingent liabilities acquired are recorded at their fair values. The determination of fair values of assets and liabilities acquired requires estimates and the use of valuation techniques when market value is not readily available. For any intangible asset identified, depending on the type of intangible asset and the complexity of determining its fair value, an independent valuation expert or management may develop the fair value, using appropriate valuation techniques, which are generally based on a forecast of the total expected future net cash flows. For intangible assets, the Company generally uses the income approach to determine fair value. The income approach requires management to make significant estimates and assumptions. These estimates and assumptions primarily include, but are not limited to: discount rates, terminal growth rates, royalty rates, forecasts of revenue, operating income, depreciation, amortization and capital expenditures. The discount rates applied to the projections reflect the risk factors associated with those projections. Judgment is also required in determining the intangible asset’s useful life.
Although the Company believes its estimates of fair value are reasonable, actual financial results could differ from those estimates due to the inherent uncertainty involved in making such estimates. Changes in assumptions concerning future financial results or other underlying assumptions could have a significant impact on the determination of the fair value of the intangible assets acquired. Certain fair values may be estimated at the transaction date pending confirmation or completion of the valuation process. Where provisional values are used in accounting for a business combination, they may be adjusted in subsequent periods.
Provision for Income Tax
Provision for income taxes are made using the best estimate of the amount expected to be paid based on a qualitative assessment of all relevant factors. The Company reviews the adequacy of these provisions at the end of the reporting period. Although we believe our assumptions, judgements and estimates are reasonable, changes in tax laws or our interpretation of tax laws and the resolution of any tax audits could significantly impact the amounts provided for income taxes.
We recognize tax benefits from uncertain tax positions only if we believe that it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities based on the technical merits of the position. These uncertain tax positions include our estimates related to uncertainties that are based on an assessment of whether our available documentation corroborating the nature of our activities supporting the tax positions will be sufficient. However, it is possible that at some future date an additional liability could result from audits by taxing authorities. If the final outcome of these tax related matters is different from the amounts that were initially recorded, such differences will affect the tax provisions in the period in which such determination is made. The IRS has taken the position that cannabis companies are subject to the limits of Section 280E of the Code under which they are only allowed to deduct expenses directly related to costs of goods sold. The Company has taken a position that its deduction of ordinary and necessary business expenses is not limited by Section 280E of the Code.

---

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Financial Risk Management
The Company is exposed in varying degrees to a variety of financial instrument related risks. The Board and the Audit Committee mitigate these risks by assessing, monitoring and approving the Company’s risk management processes:
Credit Risk
The Company reviews its trade receivable accounts regularly and reduces amounts to their expected realizable values by adjusting the allowance for credit losses when management determines that the account may not be fully collectable. The Company applies ASC 326 Financial Instruments - Credit Losses for the measurement of expected credit losses, which uses an expected loss allowance model for all trade receivables. The Company has adopted standardized credit policies and performs assessments in an effort to minimize those risks. The Company has not identified significant credit risk with respect to its customers noting that a customer is a single retail customer or an individual dispensary customer.
The Company provides credit to its customers in the normal course of business and has established credit evaluation and monitoring processes to mitigate credit risk, but has limited risk as the majority of its sales are transacted with cash.
Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of banking and credit risk consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents. The Company’s cash and cash equivalents primarily consisted of bank deposits and cash on hand. Concentrations of credit risk with respect to our cash and cash equivalents is limited primarily to amounts held with financial institutions in excess of federally insured limits.
Liquidity Risk
Liquidity risk is the risk that the Company will not be able to meet its financial obligations associated with financial liabilities. The Company manages liquidity risk through the management of its capital structure. The Company’s approach to managing liquidity is to ensure that it will have sufficient liquidity to settle obligations and liabilities when due.
Market Risk
Market risk is the risk of loss arising from adverse changes in market rates and prices, such as interest rates, foreign exchange rates, raw materials and other commodity prices. As domestic economic conditions change, trends in discretionary consumer spending also become unpredictable and subject to reductions due to uncertainties about the future. A general reduction in consumer discretionary spending due to a recession in the domestic economy, or uncertainties regarding future economic prospects, could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations. The Company takes steps to mitigate this risk through diversifying Verano branded products at price points suitable for our customer base.
Currency Risk
The operating results and financial position of the Company are reported in U.S. dollars. However, some of the Company’s financial transactions are denominated in Canadian Dollars. The results of the Company’s operations are subject to currency transaction risks. The Company has no hedging agreements in place with respect to foreign exchange rates. The Company has not entered into any agreements or purchased any instruments to hedge possible currency risks.
Interest Rate Risk
Interest rate risk is the risk that the fair value or future cash flows of a financial instrument will fluctuate because of changes in market interest rates. Cash and cash equivalents bear interest at market rates. Management believes that if the Company’s rates of interest associated with its debt obligations were to hypothetically change 10% in the relative interest rate, it would not have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated annual results of operations or cash flows.
Commodities Price Risk
Commodities price risk is the risk of variability in fair value due to movements in equity or market prices. The primary raw materials used by the Company aside from those cultivated internally are labels and packaging. Management believes a hypothetical 10% change in the price of these raw materials would not have a significant effect on the Company’s consolidated annual results of operations or cash flows, as these costs are generally passed through to its customers. However, such an increase could have an impact on our customers’ demand for our products, and we are not able to quantify the impact of such potential change in demand on our combined annual results of operations or cash flows.
Banking Risk
Notwithstanding that a majority of states have legalized medical or adult use cannabis, or both, there has been no change in U.S. federal banking laws related to the deposit and holding of funds derived from activities related to the cannabis industry. Given that U.S. federal law provides that the production and possession of cannabis is illegal, there is a strong argument that banks cannot accept for deposit, funds from businesses involved with the cannabis industry. Consequently, businesses involved in the cannabis industry often have difficulty accessing the U.S. banking system and traditional financing sources. The inability to open bank accounts with certain institutions may make it difficult to operate the businesses of the Company and leaves their cash holdings vulnerable.
Asset Forfeiture Risk
Because the cannabis industry remains illegal under U.S. federal law, any property owned by participants in the cannabis industry, which either are used in the course of conducting such business, or are the proceeds of such business, could be subject to seizure by law enforcement and subsequent civil asset forfeiture. Even if the owner of the property was never charged with a crime, the property in question could still be seized and subject to an administrative proceeding by which, with minimal due process, it could be subject to forfeiture.
Regulatory Risk
Regulatory risk pertains to the risk that the Company’s business objectives are contingent, in part, upon the compliance of regulatory requirements. Due to the nature of the industry, the Company recognizes that regulatory requirements are more stringent and punitive in nature. Any delays in obtaining, or failure to obtain regulatory approvals can significantly delay operational and product development and can have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, results of operation, and financial condition.
The Company is cognizant of the advent of regulatory changes occurring in the cannabis industry on the city, state, and national levels. Although regulatory outlook on the cannabis industry has been moving in a positive trend, the Company is aware of the effect that unforeseen regulatory changes can have on the goals and operations of the business as a whole.
Tax Risk
Tax risk is the risk of changes in the tax environment that would have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, results of operations, and financial condition. Currently, state licensed cannabis businesses are assessed a comparatively high effective federal tax rate due to Section 280E of the Code which bars businesses from deducting all expenses except their cost of sales when calculating federal tax liability. The Company has taken a position that its deduction of ordinary and necessary business expenses is not limited by Section 280E of the Code. Any increase in tax levies resulting from additional tax measures may have a further adverse effect on the operations of the Company, while any decrease in such tax levies will be beneficial to future operations.

---

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
The financial information required by Item 8 is located beginning on page of this report.

---

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.

---

ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information we are required to disclose in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. As required by Rule 13a-15(b) and Rule 15d-15(b) under the Exchange Act, our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated, as of December 31, 2024, the end of the period covered by this Form 10-K, the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e) and Rule 15d-15(e). Based on this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this Form 10-K.
We believe that a controls system, no matter how well designed and operated, cannot provide absolute assurance that the objectives of the controls systems are met, and no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud or error, if any, within a company have been detected.
Management’s Report on Internal Controls over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act. This system is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of consolidated financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Because of the inherent limitations of internal control over financial reporting, including the possibility of collusion or improper management override of controls, misstatements due to error or fraud may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.
Remediation of Previously Identified Material Weaknesses
In connection with the audit of our consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2023, we identified material weaknesses in our internal controls over financial reporting. The previously reported material weaknesses, pertain to (i) a lack of appropriate internal controls to mitigate process risk points (“PRP”); (ii) a lack of appropriately design and effectiveness of Information Technology General Controls (“ITGC”) over vendor-hosted applications used by the Company supporting revenue and inventory processes; (iii) ineffectively designed controls over revenue and inventory processes to mitigate PRP; and (iv) ineffective implementation and documentation of management review controls over the goodwill and intangible asset impairment assessment.
During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024, management, with the oversight of the Audit Committee, implemented the following measures to remediate such material weaknesses described above:
•The Company enhanced its risk assessment process, implemented more frequent monitoring activities, and improved coordination between Internal Audit and management to proactively address changes in financial reporting risks.
•The Company addressed deficiencies by strengthening user access controls, improving change management procedures, and where vendor-hosted applications lacked direct ITGC controls, compensating business process controls were implemented to mitigate financial reporting risks.
•Additional reconciliation and validation procedures were implemented for retail and cultivation (wholesale) revenue, as well as inventory balances. Management also enhanced monitoring and reporting controls over inventory processes and strengthened ITGC and business process controls related to financial reporting systems.
•Management implemented enhanced review controls, strengthened documentation of key inputs used in impairment testing, and increased training for personnel involved in the evaluation process.
Such material weaknesses were deemed to be remediated as of the end of the period covered by this Form 10-K given the applicable controls have operated for a sufficient period of time and management has concluded, through testing, that the controls are designed and operate effectively.
Our management performed an assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting at December 31, 2024, utilizing the criteria discussed in the “Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013)” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. The objective of this assessment was to determine whether our internal control over financial reporting were effective as of December 31, 2024. Based on management's assessment, management has concluded that our internal controls over financial reporting were effective as of December 31, 2024.
Our disclosure controls and procedures and internal controls over financial reporting are designed to provide reasonable assurance of achieving their objectives as specified above. Management does not expect, however, that our disclosure controls and procedures and internal controls over financial reporting will prevent or detect all error and fraud. Any control system, no matter how well designed and operated, is based upon certain assumptions and can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that its objectives will be met. Further, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that misstatements due to error or fraud will not occur or that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected.
The effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2024, has been audited by our independent registered public accounting firm as stated in their report which appears herein.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There have not been any changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the last fiscal quarter of the year ended December 31, 2024, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

---

ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION
Rule 10b5-1 Trading Plans
As previously disclosed in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 15, 2024 and subsequent Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, each of Laura Marie Kalesnik, Edward McDermott, David Spreckman, Richard Tarapchak, John Tipton and Darren Weiss entered into prearranged share trading plans, all of which are intended to satisfy the affirmative defenses of Rule 10b5-1(c) under the Exchange Act and the Company’s policies regarding insider trading, which were set to terminate December 31, 2024. Due to a settlement event that will occur in 2025 that affects awards covered by the applicable plans which vested in 2024, these plans will terminate upon the completion of all sales relating to such settlement event.
Brett Summerer, the Company’s Chief Financial Officer, terminated his prearranged share trading plan, which was intended to satisfy the affirmative defenses of Rule 10b5-1(c) under the Exchange Act and the Company’s policies regarding insider transaction, on December 13, 2024.
During the three months ended December 31, 2024, Brett Summerer adopted a new prearranged share trading plan following the termination of his prior plan noted above, with a brokerage firm on the date set forth opposite his name below. This plan which was entered into during an open trading window under the Company's insider trading policy and is intended to satisfy the affirmative defense of Rule 10b5-1(c) under the Exchange Act and the Company’s policies regarding insider transactions. The details regarding the estimated number of Subordinate Voting Shares for sale and the expiration date is set forth opposite his name below.
Name Title Date of Adoption Estimated Number of Subordinate Voting Shares for Sale1
Expiration Date2
Brett Summerer Chief Financial Officer December 13, 20243
317,455 December 31, 2026
1 Such amounts reflect estimated tax withholdings and actual sale amounts may vary.
2 Such plans are subject to earlier termination in the event of certain limited circumstances, and may remain in place until all sales contemplated by the plan are completed.
3 Such prearranged share trading plan will not become effective until the completion of the applicable cooling-off period following the termination of Mr. Summerer’s plan terminated in December 2024.

---

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to our definitive proxy statement for our 2025 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (our “2025 Proxy Statement”), which will be filed with the SEC not later than 120 days subsequent to December 31, 2024.

---

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to our 2025 Proxy Statement, which will be filed with the SEC not later than 120 days subsequent to December 31, 2024.

---

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNER AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to our 2025 Proxy Statement, which will be filed with the SEC not later than 120 days subsequent to December 31, 2024.

---

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to our 2025 Proxy Statement, which will be filed with the SEC not later than 120 days subsequent to December 31, 2024.

---

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES
The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to our 2025 Proxy Statement, which will be filed with the SEC not later than 120 days subsequent to December 31, 2024.
PART IV

---

ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
(a)Financial Statement and Schedules
The following Consolidated Financial Statements are included on the pages indicated:
Verano Holdings, Corp. Audited Consolidated Financial Statements
Page
Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
(MGO PCAOB ID: 324)
Consolidated Balance Sheets
as of December 31, 2024 and 2023
Consolidated Statements of Operations
for the Years Ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity
for the Years Ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
for the Years Ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(b)Exhibits
A list of exhibits filed with this Form 10-K is included in the Exhibit Index with Appendix A immediately preceding and is incorporated herein by reference:
Exhibit
Number Description of Exhibit
3.1 Articles of Verano Holdings Corp., dated February 11, 2021 (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to our Registration Statement on Form 10 filed on April 26, 2022 (File No. 000-56342) and incorporated herein by reference).
3.2 Notice of Articles of Verano Holdings Corp., dated February 11, 2021 (filed as Exhibit 3.2 to our Registration Statement on Form 10 filed April 26, 2022 (File No. 000-56342) and incorporated herein by reference).
4.1 Description of Registered Securities (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K on March 30, 2023 (File No. 000-56342) and incorporated herein by reference).
10.1† Credit Agreement, dated as of October 27, 2022, by and among Verano Holdings Corp., certain subsidiaries of Verano Holdings Corp. from time-to-time party thereto, certain lenders from time-to-time party thereto, and Chicago Atlantic Admin, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, as administrative agent for the lenders (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 27, 2022 (File No. 000-56342) and incorporated herein by reference).
10.2†† Executive Employment Agreement between Verano Holdings Corp. and George Archos, dated February 18, 2021 (filed as Exhibit 10.3 to our Registration Statement on Form 10 filed on April 26, 2022 (File No. 000-56342) and incorporated herein by reference).
10.3†† Amendment to Executive Employment Agreement between Verano Holdings Corp. and George Archos, effective January 1, 2022 (filed as Exhibit 10.4 to our Registration Statement on Form 10 filed on April 26, 2022 (File No. 000-56342) and incorporated herein by reference).
10.4†† Executive Employment Agreement between Verano Holdings Corp. and Darren Weiss, dated February 18, 2021 (filed as Exhibit 10.5 to our Registration Statement on Form 10 filed on April 26, 2022 (File No. 000-56342) and incorporated herein by reference).
10.5†† Amendment to Executive Employment Agreement between Verano Holdings Corp. and Darren Weiss, effective January 1, 2022 (filed as Exhibit 10.6 to our Registration Statement on Form 10 filed on April 26, 2022 (File No. 000-56342) and incorporated herein by reference).
10.6†† Executive Employment Agreement between Verano Holdings Corp. and John Tipton, dated March 31, 2021 (filed as Exhibit 10.7 to our Registration Statement on Form 10 filed on April 26, 2022 (File No. 000-56342) and incorporated herein by reference).
10.7†† Executive Employment Agreement between Verano Holdings Corp. and Brett Summerer, dated to be effective as of January 1, 2022 (filed as Exhibit 10.9 to our Registration Statement on Form 10 filed on April 26, 2022 (File No. 000-56342) and incorporated herein by reference).
Exhibit
Number Description of Exhibit
10.8†† Executive Employment Agreement between Verano Holdings Corp. and Laura Kalesnik, dated March 1, 2021 (filed as Exhibit 10.8 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K on March 15, 2024 (File No. 000-56342) and incorporated herein by reference).
10.9†† Stock and Equity Incentive Plan of Verano Holdings Corp (filed as Exhibit 10.10 to our Registration Statement on Form 10 filed on April 26, 2022 (File No. 000-56342) and incorporated herein by reference).
10.10†† Form of Equity Award Agreement for Stock Option (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on August 8, 2023 (File No. 000-56342) and incorporated herein by reference).
10.11†† Form of Equity Award Agreement for RSU (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on August 8, 2023 (File No. 000-56342) and incorporated herein by reference).
10.12†† Verano Holdings Corp. Annual Bonus Plan (filed as Exhibit 10.12 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K on March 15, 2024 (File No. 000-56342) and incorporated herein by reference).
10.13† Loan Agreement, dated as of December 26, 2023, by and between a subsidiary of the Company as the Borrower and First Federal Bank (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 2, 2024 (File No. 000-56342) and incorporated herein by reference).
10.14† Promissory Note, dated as of December 26, 2023, by a subsidiary of the Company as the Borrower, in favor of First Federal Bank (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 2, 2024 (File No. 000-56342) and incorporated herein by reference).
10.15†† Cash Incentive Plan (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 26, 2024 (File No. 000-56342) and incorporated herein by reference).
10.16†† Form of Cash Award Agreement (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 26, 2024 (File No. 000-56342) and incorporated herein by reference).
10.17 Equity Purchase Agreement, dated July 29, 2024, among Verano Holdings, LLC, Verano Holdings Corp., Columbia Care Eastern Virginia LLC and the members of Columbia Care Eastern Virginia LLC and The Cannabist Company Holdings Inc. (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 31, 2024 (File No. 000-56342) and incorporated herein by reference).
10.18† Verano Holdings, LLC Promissory Note (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 22, 2024 (File No. 000-56342) and incorporated herein by reference).
10.19† Equity Purchase Agreement, dated July 29, 2024, among Verano Arizona, LLC, 203 Organix L.L.C., CC VA HoldCo LLC, Columbia Care-Arizona, Prescott, L.L.C. and The Cannabist Company Holdings Inc. (filed as Exhibit 10.3 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 31, 2024 (File No. 000-56342) and incorporated herein by reference).
10.20† Equity Purchase Agreement, dated July 29, 2024, among Verano Arizona, LLC, Salubrious Wellness Clinic, Inc., CC VA HoldCo LLC, Thomas Allison, Columbia Care-Arizona, Prescott, L.L.C. and The Cannabist Company Holdings Inc. (filed as Exhibit 10.4 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 31, 2024 (File No. 000-56342) and incorporated herein by reference).
14.1* Code of Business Conduct and Ethics
19.1* Verano Holdings Corp. Insider Trading Policy
21.1* List of Subsidiaries of the Registrant
23.1* Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, Macias Gini & O’Connell LLP
31.1* Certification of CEO pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
31.2* Certification of CFO pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
32.1* Certification of CEO Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
Exhibit
Number Description of Exhibit
32.2* Certification of CFO Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
97.1* Verano Holdings Corp. Clawback Policy
101.INS Inline XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CAL Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
101.DEF Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
101.LAB Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
101.PRE Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
104 Cover Page Interactive Data File (embedded within the Inline XBRL Document)
* Filed or furnished herewith. The certifications attached as Exhibit 32.1 and Exhibit 32.2 that accompany this Form 10-K are not deemed filed with the SEC and are not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of Verano Holdings Corp. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, whether made before or after the date of this Form 10-K, irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
† Certain confidential portions of this exhibit have been omitted and replaced with “[***]”. Such identified information has been excluded from this exhibit because it (i) is not material and (ii) would likely cause competitive harm to the Company if disclosed.
†† Management contract, compensatory plan or arrangement.
Appendix A
List of Licenses of Verano Holdings Corp.
Licenses in the State of Arizona
Holding Entity License/Permit City Renewal Date Description
203 Organix, LLC 00000074DCGW00540313 Prescott 8/7/2026 Medical Marijuana Dispensary Registration Certificate
203 Organix, LLC 00000070ESCO78837103 Prescott 8/7/2026 Adult-Use Marijuana Establishment License
Azgm 3, LLC 00000126DCSO00060479 Chandler 1/21/2027 Medical Marijuana Dispensary Registration Certificate
Azgm 3, LLC 00000040ESDX57445071 Chandler 1/21/2027 Adult-Use Marijuana Establishment License
Fort Consulting, LLC 00000105DCOU00194638 Phoenix 1/21/2027 Medical Marijuana Dispensary Registration Certificate
Fort Consulting, LLC 00000064ESAK09838873 Phoenix 1/21/2027 Adult-Use Marijuana Establishment License
Patient Alternative Relief Center, LLC 00000091DCWY00555666 Phoenix 8/7/2026 Medical Marijuana Dispensary Registration Certificate
Patient Alternative Relief Center, LLC 00000086ESQZ01367420 Phoenix 8/7/2026 Adult-Use Marijuana Establishment License
Perpetual Healthcare, LLC 00000033DCCK00134006 Phoenix 8/7/2026 Medical Marijuana Dispensary Registration Certificate
Perpetual Healthcare, LLC 00000105ESDR54985961 Phoenix 8/7/2026 Adult-Use Marijuana Establishment License
Salubrious Wellness Clinic, Inc. 000000097DCGK00454998 Tempe 8/7/2026 Medical Marijuana Dispensary Registration Certificate
Salubrious Wellness Clinic, Inc. 00000071ESFP14031510 Tempe 8/7/2026 Adult-Use Marijuana Establishment License
The Medicine Room, LLC 00000037DCDM00904008 Mesa 8/7/2026 Medical Marijuana Dispensary Registration Certificate
The Medicine Room, LLC 00000084ESFH12297246 Mesa 8/7/2026 Adult-Use Marijuana Establishment License
Vending Logistics, LLC 00000112DCLK00614860 Mesa 1/21/2027 Medical Marijuana Dispensary Registration Certificate
Vending Logistics, LLC 00000043ESPE02331128 Mesa 1/21/2027 Adult-Use Marijuana Establishment License
Licenses in the State of Connecticut
Holding Entity License/Permit City Renewal Date Description
Caring Nature EJV2, LLC AMHF.0008262 Naugatauk 4/23/2025 Adult-Use Cannabis Medical Hybrid Retailer License
Caring Nature, LLC AMHF.0008287 Waterbury 1/26/2026 Adult-Use Cannabis Medical Hybrid Retailer License
Connecticut Pharmaceutical Solutions, LLC MMPR.0000002 Rocky Hill 2/10/2026 Medical Marijuana Producer License
CTPharma Newington, LLC AMHF.0008258 Newington 10/11/2025 Adult-Use Cannabis Medical Hybrid Retailer License
CTPharma Norwich, LLC AMHF.0008257 Norwich 7/6/2025 Adult-Use Cannabis Medical Hybrid Retailer License
Willow Brook Enfield, LLC AMHF.0008260 Enfield 3/6/2025 Adult-Use Cannabis Medical Hybrid Retailer License
Willow Brook Wellness, LLC AMHF.0008254 Meriden 12/17/2025 Adult-Use Cannabis Medical Hybrid Retailer License
Licenses in the State of Florida
Holding Entity License/Permit City Renewal Date Description
Plants of Ruskin, LLC MMTC-2017-0010 Apollo Beach 6/22/2026 Medical Marijuana Treatment Center License
Licenses in the State of Illinois
Holding Entity License/Permit City Renewal Date Description
420 Capital Management, LLC 280.000054-DISP Chicago 4/3/2026 Registered Medical Cannabis Dispensing Organization License
420 Capital Management, LLC 284.000128-AUDO Chicago 3/31/2026 Adult-Use Cannabis Dispensing Organization License
420 Capital Management, LLC 284.000127-AUDO Lombard 3/31/2026 Adult-Use Cannabis Dispensing Organization License
Ataraxia, LLC 1503060700 Albion 3/9/2026 Medical Cannabis Cultivation Center Permit
Ataraxia, LLC 1503060700-AU Albion 3/30/2026 Adult-Use Cultivation Center License
Ataraxia, LLC 1503060700-TR Albion 7/14/2025 Transporter License
Elevele, LLC 280.000032-DISP Highland Park 3/18/2026 Registered Medical Cannabis Dispensing Organization License
Elevele, LLC 284.000135-AUDO Highland Park 3/31/2026 Registered Adult-Use Cannabis Dispensing Organization License
Elevele, LLC 284.000136-AUDO Prospect Heights 3/31/2026 Adult-Use Cannabis Dispensing Organization License
Healthway Services of West Illinois, LLC 280.000020-DISP St. Charles 12/23/2025 Registered Medical Cannabis Dispensing Organization License
Healthway Services of West Illinois, LLC 284.000139-AUDO St. Charles 3/31/2026 Registered Adult-Use Cannabis Dispensing Organization License
Healthway Services of West Illinois, LLC 284.000140-AUDO Naperville 3/31/2026 Adult-Use Cannabis Dispensing Organization License
MME Aurora Retail, LLC 284.000132-AUDO Aurora 3/31/2026 Adult-Use Cannabis Dispensing Organization License
MME Evanston Retail, LLC 280.000009-DISP Evanston 11/9/2025 Registered Medical Cannabis Dispensing Organization License
MME Evanston Retail, LLC 284.000131-AUDO Evanston 3/31/2026 Adult-Use Cannabis Dispensing Organization License
The Herbal Care Center, Inc. 280.000051-DISP Chicago 1/13/2026 Registered Medical Cannabis Dispensing Organization License
The Herbal Care Center, Inc. 284.000133-AUDO Chicago 3/31/2026 Adult-Use Cannabis Dispensing Organization License
The Herbal Care Center, Inc. 284.000134-AUDO Chicago 3/31/2026 Adult-Use Cannabis Dispensing Organization License
Licenses in the State of Maryland
Holding Entity License/Permit City Renewal Date Description
AGG Wellness, LLC DA-23-00102 Towson 6/30/2028 Medical & Adult Use Cannabis Establishment License
FGM Processing, LLC PA-23-00025 Jessup 6/30/2028 Medical & Adult Use Cannabis Establishment License
Freestate Wellness, LLC GA-23-00004 Jessup 6/30/2028 Medical & Adult Use Cannabis Establishment License
Freestate Wellness, LLC DA-23-00010 Elkridge 6/30/2028 Medical & Adult Use Cannabis Establishment License
Maryland Natural Treatment Solutions, LLC DA-23-00047 Pasadena 6/30/2028 Medical & Adult Use Cannabis Establishment License
Mikran, LLC DA-23-00044 Germantown 6/30/2028 Medical & Adult Use Cannabis Establishment License
Licenses in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Holding Entity License/Permit City Renewal Date Description
Four Daughters Compassionate Care, Inc. RMD1691 Sharon 1/15/2026 Medical Marijuana Treatment Center License
Four Daughters Compassionate Care, Inc. MC282243 Sharon 12/12/2025 Marijuana Cultivator License
Four Daughters Compassionate Care, Inc. MP281715 Sharon 12/12/2025 Marijuana Product Manufacturer License
Four Daughters Compassionate Care, Inc. MR281552 Sharon 12/12/2025 Marijuana Retailer License
Four Daughters Compassionate Care, Inc. MR282232 Plymouth 6/12/2025 Marijuana Retailer License
Licenses in the State of Michigan
Holding Entity License/Permit City Renewal Date Description
Buchanan Development, LLC PC-000069 Buchannan 4/25/2025 Facility License Provisioning Center
Buchanan Development, LLC AU-R-000183 Buchannan 3/16/2025 Establishment License Marihuana Retailer
Licenses in the State of Nevada
Holding Entity License/Permit City Renewal Date Description
Lone Mountain Partners, LLC C122 North Las Vegas 6/30/2025 Adult-Use Cultivation License
Lone Mountain Partners, LLC P077 North Las Vegas 6/30/2025 Adult-Use Production License
Lone Mountain Partners, LLC T048 North Las Vegas 6/30/2025 Adult-Use Distribution License
Lone Mountain Partners, LLC RD592 North Las Vegas 11/30/2025 Adult-Use Retail Store License
Lone Mountain Partners, LLC RD590 Spring Valley 11/30/2025 Adult-Use Retail Store License
Naturex, LLC D081 Las Vegas 6/30/2025 Adult-Use Retail Store License
WSCC, Inc. D149 Carson City 6/30/2025 Adult-Use Retail Store License
WSCC, Inc. D111 Reno 6/30/2025 Adult-Use Retail Store License
Licenses in the State of New Jersey
Holding Entity License/Permit City Renewal Date Description
Verano NJ, LLC MC000012 Branchburg 12/31/2025 ATC Permit - Cultivation/Processing
Verano NJ, LLC MM000008 Branchburg 12/31/2025 ATC Permit - Manufacturing
Verano NJ, LLC C000009 Branchburg 4/17/2025 Class 1 - Adult-Use Cultivator License
Verano NJ, LLC M000007 Branchburg 4/17/2025 Class 2 - Adult-Use Manufacturer License
Verano NJ, LLC MRE000031 Elizabeth 12/31/2025 ATC Permit - Medical Dispensing
Verano NJ, LLC RE000001 Elizabeth 4/20/2025 Class 5 - Adult-Use Cannabis Retailer License
Verano NJ, LLC MRE000034 Neptune 12/31/2025 ATC Permit - Medical Dispensing
Verano NJ, LLC RE000030 Neptune 8/1/2025 Class 5 - Adult-Use Cannabis Retailer License
Verano NJ, LLC MRE000033 Lawrence 12/31/2025 ATC Permit - Medical Dispensing
Verano NJ, LLC RE000002 Lawrence 4/20/2025 Class 5 - Adult-Use Cannabis Retailer License
Zen Leaf Mount Holly, LLC RE000913 Mount Holly 11/11/2025 Class 5 - Adult-Use Cannabis Retailer License
Licenses in the State of Ohio
Holding Entity License/Permit City Renewal Date Description
Mother Grows Best, LLC CCC000033-00 Canton 11/24/2025 Dual Use Cultivation Certificate of Operation
Mother Grows Best, LLC CCP000034-00 Canton 11/23/2025 Dual Use Processor Certificate of Operation
Mother Grows Best, LLC CCD000184-00 Antwerp 10/20/2025 Dual Use Dispensary Certificate of Operation
Mother Knows Best, LLC CCD000058-00 Canton 7/1/2025 Dual Use Dispensary Certificate of Operation
Ohio Natural Treatment Solutions, LLC CCD000057-00 Newark 7/1/2025 Dual Use Dispensary Certificate of Operation
GreenRx, LLC CCD000045-00 Cincinnati 7/1/2025 Dual Use Dispensary Certificate of Operation
Glass City Alternatives, LLC CCD000056-00 Bowling Green 7/1/2025 Dual Use Dispensary Certificate of Operation
Mad River Remedies, LLC CCD000047-00 Riverside 7/1/2025 Dual Use Dispensary Certificate of Operation
Licenses in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
Holding Entity License/Permit City Renewal Date Description
Agri-Kind, LLC GP18-1006 Chester 7/31/2025 Medical Marijuana Grower/Processor Facility
Agronomed Biologics, LLC CR06-GP19-1102 Chester 6/19/2025 Medical Marijuana Grower/Processor Facility
Agronomed Biologics, LLC CR06-D19-1103 West Chester 6/19/2025 Medical Marijuana Dispensary Facility
Agronomed Biologics, LLC CR06-D19-1103 Fairless Hills 6/19/2025 Medical Marijuana Dispensary Facility
Agronomed Biologics, LLC CR06-D19-1103 Pittsburgh 6/19/2025 Medical Marijuana Dispensary Facility
Agronomed Biologics, LLC CR06-D19-1103 New Kensington 6/19/2025 Medical Marijuana Dispensary Facility
Agronomed Biologics, LLC CR06-D19-1103 Pittsburgh 6/19/2025 Medical Marijuana Dispensary Facility
Agronomed Biologics, LLC CR06-D19-1103 Norristown 6/19/2025 Medical Marijuana Dispensary Facility
Local Dispensaries, LLC D18-3015 Harrisburg 12/18/2025 Medical Marijuana Dispensary Facility
Local Dispensaries, LLC D18-3015 York 12/18/2025 Medical Marijuana Dispensary Facility
Local Dispensaries, LLC D18-3015 Altoona 12/18/2025 Medical Marijuana Dispensary Facility
NSE Pennsylvania, LLC D18-1034 Philadelphia 12/18/2025 Medical Marijuana Dispensary Facility
NSE Pennsylvania, LLC D18-1034 Wynnewood 12/18/2025 Medical Marijuana Dispensary Facility
NSE Pennsylvania, LLC D18-1034 Clifton Heights 12/18/2025 Medical Marijuana Dispensary Facility
TerraVida Holistic Centers, LLC D-1053-17 Sellersville 6/29/2025 Medical Marijuana Dispensary Facility
TerraVida Holistic Centers, LLC D-1053-17 Abington 6/29/2025 Medical Marijuana Dispensary Facility
TerraVida Holistic Centers, LLC D-1053-17 Malvern 6/29/2025 Medical Marijuana Dispensary Facility
The Healing Center, LLC D-5026-17 Cranberry 6/29/2025 Medical Marijuana Dispensary Facility
The Healing Center, LLC D-5026-17 Monroeville 6/29/2025 Medical Marijuana Dispensary Facility
The Healing Center, LLC D-5026-17 Washington 6/29/2025 Medical Marijuana Dispensary Facility
Licenses in the State of Virginia
Holding Entity License/Permit City Renewal Date Description
Columbia Care Eastern Virginia LLC 240000002 Portsmouth 4/30/2025 Medical Cultivation & Dispensary
Columbia Care Eastern Virginia LLC 247000012 Hampton 1/31/2026 Medical Dispensary
Columbia Care Eastern Virginia LLC 247000014 Norfolk 3/31/2025 Medical Dispensary
Columbia Care Eastern Virginia LLC 247000017 Suffolk 7/31/2025 Medical Dispensary
Columbia Care Eastern Virginia LLC 247000004 Virginia Beach 12/31/2025 Medical Dispensary
Columbia Care Eastern Virginia LLC 247000010 Williamsburg 11/30/2025 Medical Dispensary
Licenses in the State of West Virginia
Holding Entity License/Permit City Renewal Date Description
Verano WV, LLC G410007 Beaver 9/30/2025 Medical Cannabis Grower Permit
Verano WV, LLC P410002 Beaver 11/12/2025 Medical Cannabis Processor Permit
Verano WV, LLC D310033 Morgantown 1/28/2026 Medical Cannabis Dispensary Permit
Verano WV, LLC D310032 Westover 1/28/2026 Medical Cannabis Dispensary Permit
Verano WV, LLC D350029 Wheeling 1/28/2026 Medical Cannabis Dispensary Permit
Verano WV, LLC D170030 Clarksburg 1/28/2026 Medical Cannabis Dispensary Permit
Verano WV, LLC D490034 Buckhannon 1/28/2026 Medical Cannabis Dispensary Permit
Verano WV, LLC D100031 Oak Hill 1/28/2026 Medical Cannabis Dispensary Permit
Verano WV, LLC D200035 Dunbar 1/28/2026 Medical Cannabis Dispensary Permit