EDGAR 10-K Filing

Company CIK: 1527102
Filing Year: 2023
Filename: 1527102_10-K_2023_0001213900-23-041268.json

---

ITEM 1. BUSINESS
Item 1. Business
Overview
Evergreen Sustainable Enterprises, Inc. (formerly Generation Hemp, Inc.) (the “Company” or “Evergreen Sustainable”), was incorporated on August 21, 2021 in the State of Delaware. The Company was originally incorporated on July 28, 2008 in the State of Colorado. On November 27, 2019, Home Treasure Finders, Inc. (“HTF”) acquired approximately 94% of the common stock of Energy Hunter Resources, Inc. (“EHR”) in a series of transactions accounted for as a reverse merger (the “Transaction”). Upon closing of the Transaction, HTF changed its name to Generation Hemp, Inc. In March 2023, the Company changed its name to Evergreen Sustainable Enterprises, Inc.
On January 11, 2021, we completed the acquisition of certain assets of Halcyon Thruput, LLC (“Halcyon”). With this acquisition, we commenced providing post-harvest and midstream services to growers by drying, processing, cleaning and stripping harvested hemp directly from the field and wetbaled at our 48,000 square foot leased facility located in Hopkinsville, Kentucky. Additionally, the Company offers safe storage services for processed hemp, which enables farmers to maximize strategic market timing. In September 2021, the Company launched its small animal bedding consumer goods product line (“Rowdy Rooster”) made from the hemp hurd byproduct that is produced from its hemp processing operations. In September of 2022, the Company launched its industrial absorbent consumer goods product line (Gas Monkey Spill-Jack), also made from the hemp hurd byproduct produced from its hemp processing operations. This second product line is marketed under a branding agreement with Gas Monkey Garage, a well-known brand in the automotive and entertainment sector.
We also generate revenue from rental of our “Cannabis Zoned” (Hemp) warehouse property located in Denver, Colorado currently leased to an unaffiliated hemp seed company.
As of December 31, 2022, EHR held an approximate 8% working interest in an oil & gas property located in Cochran County, Texas within the Slaughter-Levelland Field of the San Andres formation in the Northwest Shelf of West Texas. EHR’s oil & gas activities are currently held for sale and are presented in these consolidated financial statements as discontinued operations for each of the periods presented.
Our management team has been and continues to actively review acquisition candidates involved in the hemp industry that operate within a number of vertical businesses, predominantly within the midstream sector that are attractive to us and are within the hemp supply chain.
To fund our business activities, we have historically completed a number of private placements of equity and debt. We continue to seek additional public or private placements of our stock and debt. Our common shares are quoted on the OTCQB Markets under the symbol “EGSE.”
Subsequent Events
In January 2023, the Company announced a new strategic direction into sustainable energy projects, starting with bitcoin mining. The Company’s name was changed to Evergreen Sustainable Enterprises, Inc. (“EGSE”) in March 2023. The Company’s existing hemp operations will continue to be maintained as a fully operating wholly-owned subsidiary.
On January 9, 2023, the Company purchased 80% of Toro Energía Sociedad Anonima (“Toro”), a Costa Rican corporation with ownership of a hydroelectric dam in Costa Rica. The source of approximately one megawatt of power produced from the hydroelectric dam (six generators) will be used to power new Bitcoin mining machines at an extremely low cost. The transaction was completed based on a total enterprise value for Toro of $2,750,000, including seller-financed debt of $985,000. The seller-financed debt has a term of 10 years and a 9.5% per annum variable interest rate (based on the prime rate) with straight line amortization.
The purchase price for 80% of Toro’s equity was $1,412,000. These amounts were paid in cash from proceeds of a Secured Promissory Note (“Secured Note”) with Gary C. Evans, CEO of the Company (‘Evans”). Under the terms of the Secured Note, (a) the Company and Evans restructured (i) the Subordinated Promissory Note, dated November 20, 2020 and (ii) Convertible Promissory Note, dated July 20, 2021, such that all accrued and unpaid interest on each note were rolled into a new Secured Note, (b) Evans lent the Company $500,000 on January 9, 2023 and $969,000 on January 10, 2023. The Secured Note has a maturity date of July 15, 2023 and bears interest at the rate of 10.00% per annum. The Secured Note has a conversion feature which permits Evans to convert at the Maturity Date then outstanding principal and interest at a conversion price of $0.275 (the closing price of the Company’s stock on January 9, 2023).
The Toro Dam is located approximately 25 miles from San Jose between two volcano craters. The site generates all its energy from green resources with a proven 98% run time over the many years it has been in operation and has a full-time staff in place under a new Operating & Maintenance Agreement.
Hydroelectric power is a clean and renewable energy source that is used to generate electricity by harnessing the energy of falling water and can provide a reliable and a very cost-effective source of energy for bitcoin mining operations. Hydroelectric power can help reduce the carbon footprint of cryptocurrency mining, as many cryptocurrencies are produced using fossil fuels, which continues to contribute to greenhouse gas emissions and climate change. By using hydroelectric power, bitcoin mining can be made more environmentally friendly and sustainable and can help improve the stability and reliability of cryptocurrency networks. Hydroelectric power is a relatively stable and reliable source of energy, compared to other sources such as coal or fossil fuels, which can be prone to price fluctuations and supply disruptions. The Company has committed to acquire and made financial payments for the purchase of 240 new Bitmain S19J Pro+ ASIC miners that will be deployed at the Toro Dam sometime in the first quarter of 2023.
Corporate Structure
The Company’s business operations are conducted through several operating subsidiaries with its core operational and business activities directed through Evergreen Sustainable. These subsidiaries are listed below:
● GENH Halcyon Acquisition, LLC- Hemp midstream processing operations and hemp consumer goods products
● CryptoRica, LLC -Bitcoin mining operations located in Costa Rica
● Razorback I, LLC -Bitcoin mining operations located in Arkansas
● Bluegrass I, LLC- Bitcoin mining operations located in Kentucky
● Energy Hunter Resources, Inc.- Energy operations
Principal Services and their Markets
The Company has diversified itself to take advantage of the two developing industries of industrial hemp and bitcoin mining. Within both industries, there are vast opportunities to embody and drive environmental, social, and corporate governance (“ESG”) advancements. Within its hemp operations and product lines, the Company continues to be a leader in building out the infrastructure to support the fiber and hurd hemp supply chain for industrial applications. Within its bitcoin mining operations and developing bitcoin mining operations, the Company is primarily utilizing diversified green energy sources to power modular bitcoin mining arrays and targeting rural or remote areas that benefit both residents and local utilities.
In addition to our hydroelectric powered bitcoin operations in Costa Rica, the Company is in development on several bitcoin mining arrays in several rural or remote U.S. locations. We have two bitcoin mining arrays in development in Arkansas, an eight (8) megawatt array in south central Arkansas. We also have three bitcoin mining arrays located in Kentucky, a five (5) megawatt array in Carter County and two additional sites in various stages of development in Greenup County and again in Carter County that will potentially be a total of an additional eighteen (18) megawatts, including a site that is in-part powered with hydroelectricity.
Our hemp processing operations provide post-harvest and midstream services to growers by drying, processing, cleaning, stripping harvested hemp directly from the field and wetbaled at our leased 48,000 square foot facility located in Hopkinsville, Kentucky. The drying services technology greatly increases efficiency and capacity during harvest for farmers who need to quickly move harvested hemp while preserving the cannabinoid potency by providing scalable infrastructure essential to receive and process hemp with high moisture content (“wet”) quickly. Additionally, the Company offers safe storage services for processed hemp, which enables farmers to maximize strategic market timing. The midstream business is fee income oriented, based upon a price per pound of material handled, and therefore is more protected from significant commodity price variations. The facility is able to process approximately 10,000 wet pounds per hour and the potential to scale up to 20,000 wet pounds per hour in order to meet market demands as licensed and harvested hemp acreage continues to increase across Kentucky, Tennessee, Ohio, Alabama and other states.
We also own one industrial warehouse located in Denver, Colorado and lease 100% of this space within that project to aid a licensed hemp seed grower. We exercise appropriate and reasonable care to screen our tenants, require and verify that our tenants maintain proper licenses and operate in compliance with all applicable rules and regulations at the federal, state, and local level.
We may own properties for our own investment account and as such are solely at financial risk in connection with our investments. In the event we utilize funds loaned to us by third party groups, they may in some circumstances share certain risks.
We do not grow, distribute or sell any form of cannabis. We have no present plan to engage in such activities or obtain a license to do so, now, or in the future. We currently plan to only operate in the hemp space. We are in the process of expanding our operations into other states, predominantly Kentucky and North Carolina.
Marketing of our Services
The market, clients, customers and distribution methods for hemp services and hemp-based products are large and diverse. These markets range from hemp mid-stream services for hemp growers/farmers, to hemp derived products like bioplastics, textiles, building materials, food additives, and dietary supplements. Awareness and demand continue to grow for “green,” environmentally-friendly products derived from hemp, and the consumer market has already begun to integrate hemp products and products that contain hemp derivatives to existing product lines. The distribution system is constantly evolving as small retailers, retail chains, and big box stores become increasingly educated on and familiar/comfortable with hemp and its derivatives. The current market is focused on one of the cannabinoids derived from hemp called cannabidiol (“CBD”) and consumer goods that contain CBD. Additionally, consumer awareness followed by increased demand continues to drive and even force companies to make room on their shelves for hemp and products with hemp derivatives. For products with hemp derivatives like CBD, direct to consumer Ecommerce through online store sales remains the main source of revenue for consumer goods companies, accounting for reported percentages of approximately 70-80% of sales.
The Company continues to implement a plan to become more diversified within the midstream market. Our marketing efforts began with a grass roots approach in order to meet with farmers, growers, and seed operations that would benefit from midstream services. To supplement the grass roots outreach, we built our online web presence to reflect our desire to educate, to become a contributor and part of the hemp community, and also to act as a pioneer company to connect investors in the U.S. public markets to a hemp education and platform that is dually informed.
We maintain and update our website and engage on social media platforms to market our ongoing hemp sector efforts. We use globally distributed YouTube video ad campaigns to increase our brand awareness and encourage markets and the investment community to learn more about the hemp space. These videos have been played on several business sites such as CNBC, MSNBC, Fox News, Fox Business, Yahoo Finance, among others. We have also begun to market a version of “Fireside Chats” from our Chairman and CEO to talk about various topics of interest in the hemp space. These video segments will post on our social media platforms and they will also be used to create awareness campaigns that should have a global outreach. In order to reach region specific growers/farmers in hemp, we have teed up direct mail marketing materials which prove effective for service markets within a specified radius. These materials will serve as invitations to the farmers and growers in areas that the midstream services which we are acquiring will reach. These are designed to add an identity to the midstream facility and provide an offer of help and partnership. As we continue to become involved with additional verticals in the hemp supply chain, we will expand and tailor these marketing and advertising efforts to the specific needs of each segment. To-date all marketing, ad creation, ad campaigns, and creative work has been done internally and with a minimal budget. The Company has consistently presented at, and/or exhibited in a number of industry tradeshows, and conferences and small cap investor conferences.
In 2021, we increased our marketing efforts by engaging several industry and investor media platforms by providing or collaborating on sponsored content in the form of articles, interviews, and podcasts in order to continue to educate the public and investors on the hemp industry and our company’s various products, services, and business plan. We have been featured on USA Today, Small Caps Daily, Benzinga, Reddit, and Cannabis Wealth Magazine. Gary C. Evans has also been a guest on KRLD News Radio Dallas to discuss the Company, along with several podcasts and webinars. We have also continued to build out our social media presence on Instagram, TikTok, Facebook (Meta), Twitter, LinkedIn, and YouTube. We are attempting to post video and/or static posts at least twice per week and designing content based on statistical data of engagement metrics - what content is trending, what users are most responsive to, and what times receive the most user reach and engagement. For reference, when comparing social media engagement from October 18, 2021 - December 28, 2021 to the same period for 2020, reach increased by 4,912% and engagement increased by 420% due to these efforts by management and the social media team.
On February 17, 2022, we executed a merchandise licensing agreement with world-renowned brand, Gas Monkey Garage. The Company will manufacture a USA grown hemp hurd spill absorbent and market this new product under the Gas Monkey brand name to consumers, retailers, and distributors as an environmentally sustainable, USA made, ultra-absorbent spill clean-up material. This will be our second environmentally sustainable consumer goods product line made from U.S. grown hemp hurd. Spill absorbents are typically used in garages, factories, or industrial settings to quickly contain spills of oil and other liquids. Spill absorbents are also used at the site of auto accidents to quickly contain leaks of oil and other fluids due to collisions.
Richard Rawlings, owner and founder of Gas Monkey Garage, is the star of the international hit series’ “Fast N’ Loud” & “Garage Rehab” spanning 17+ seasons and 200+ episodes. Mr. Rawlings and Gas Monkey have migrated the show to an online platform and consistently produce new episodes that premiere every week on YouTube and Facebook. With his experience of owning and running a garage for over 18 years, Richard Rawlings found the sustainable spill absorbent to be of great significance.
There are several types of spill absorbents with varying characteristics. These are in three general categories - mineral based, animal or vegetable based, and synthetic or organic polymers. The challenge in choosing an absorbent is finding an effective absorbent that does not pose a threat to health or the environment, whether that threat is posed when that material is procured or used. For example, a widely used spill absorbent material in products is Bentonite Clay. This is often a very dusty material and has warnings of containing unsafe levels of lead (FDA) and is associated with a number of health complaints in humans.
The Company tested its U.S. grown and milled hemp hurd against currently used absorbents on the market and the findings showed it to have as effective or more effective absorbency and ability to contain spills.
In February of 2023, the Company began working with iHeart Media, one of the most influential media companies with several different marketing and advertising channels (radio, television, digital, etc.). iHeart Media agreed to drastically reduce their typical budget requirements in order to foster a growth relationship with the Company. The first campaigns, called OTT (Over-The-Top), are targeting specific consumers, and will air before streaming television and film content played on various internet streaming digital platforms. Initially, these campaigns are advertising the Company’s consumer goods products.
Competition
The hemp industry and hemp-based consumer product industry is highly competitive and fragmented in its nascency with numerous companies, consisting of publicly (mostly Canadian) and privately-owned companies. There are also large, well-funded companies beginning to emerge in the U.S. with a similar intention as the Company; to consolidate and vertically integrate along the hemp supply chain through acquisitions. These companies have indicated their intention to compete in the hemp industry and hemp-based product category. However, certain holding companies such as Acreage Holdings (domiciled in British Columbia) also include cannabis companies in their portfolio, whereas the Company is currently hemp only. We routinely evaluate internal and external opportunities to optimize value for shareholders through market research, strategic relationships and/or partnerships, and by asset acquisitions. Based upon our management team experience, we believe we are well-positioned to capitalize in the growing hemp industry and hemp-based product industry.
There are several companies developing hemp-based products and materials that will potentially displace existing products and materials sourced from less sustainable or less environmentally friendly sources. These hemp-based products are developing in the markets of textiles, building materials, biofuels, as food additives, skin care topicals and other therapeutics, and dietary supplements. Also, it is thought that cannabinoids derived from hemp can be used as therapeutics for a range of medical indications. The hemp-derived cannabinoid therapeutic market currently includes extracts of the hemp plant in several formulations, including proprietary formulations from several companies. These formulations include CBD and other cannabinoid such as,” CBG”, “CBC”, and “CBN” or a combination of several cannabinoids as the active ingredients. There are over one hundred different cannabinoids, therefore the market potential is only beginning to be realized. The therapeutics and supplement market are flooded with competition for hemp-based cannabinoid therapeutics. There are also companies that are using hemp-based cannabinoids as active ingredients in pharmaceutical formulations.
Bitcoin mining is an increasingly competitive industry comprised of companies and organizations of varying scale and sophistication. There has been a significant increase in the number of commercial bitcoin miners attempting to expand and scale their mining operations, which in turn has contributed to increasing the global network’s total hash power. As more hashing capability is added to the bitcoin network, the revenue generating potential of the Company’s miners could be negatively affected. Additionally, as more bitcoin miners enter the industry, The Company may experience additional pressure on profitability and ability to scale operations, due to greater competition for access to miners, mining locations, and infrastructure components.
Our Competitive Strengths
We believe that we have the following competitive strengths:
● Experienced and Committed Management Team. Gary C. Evans, our CEO, and other anticipated members of our senior management team have substantial experience in all aspects of growing a public company in a highly competitive sector, including acquisitions, dispositions, construction, development, management, finance and capital markets. Mr. Evans has previously been the Chairman and CEO of three different public companies that obtained financial success on the New York Stock Exchange. Additionally, he previously served as Chairman, CEO, and Lead Director of a NASDAQ listed company in the biopharmaceutical space for 24 years, having just resigned in 2021.
● Focus on Consolidating Atomized Industry. Our focus on revenue generating and positive cash flow businesses is a key part of our growth strategy. Moreover, we believe the beginning of an entire new industry creates numerous opportunities to evaluate and consolidate very fragmented businesses. Our ultimate goal of being a more fully integrated enterprise within the midstream sector will eventually give us control of very profitable values chain and separate us from most of our competition.
● Demonstrated Investment and Capital Raising Acumen. We will continue to utilize rigorous underwriting standards for evaluating acquisitions and potential tenants to ensure that they meet our strategic and financial criteria. Our management team’s extensive experience and relationships established in mergers and acquisitions over the past 40 years and over 100 separate transactions should enable us to identify, negotiate and close on acquisitions cost effectively, efficiently, and with shareholder interest first in mind.
Intellectual Property
As a company within the hemp industry, our current effort is to protect and distinguish our company and brand identity amidst other entities currently operating within and entering the space.
The Company uses specific hardware and software for its bitcoin mining operations. In certain cases, source code and other software assets may be subject to an open-source license due to the fact that the majority of the technology in the blockchain and cryptocurrency sectors is open source For these works, we adhere to the terms of any license agreements that may be in place. The Company does not currently own, and does not have any current plans to seek, any patents in connection with its existing and planned blockchain and cryptocurrency related operations. The Company expects to rely upon trade secrets, trademarks, service marks, trade names, copyrights and other intellectual property rights and to license the use of intellectual property rights owned and controlled by others.
Governmental Regulation
Hemp Industry
We are subject to local and federal laws in our operating jurisdictions. We will hold required licenses for product production and distribution to the extent that our business requires and will monitor changes in laws, regulations, treaties and agreements.
The Agriculture Improvement Act of 2018 known as the “2018 Farm Bill,” is United States federal legislation signed into law on December 20, 2018, which provides much of the legal framework for the hemp-based CBD product category. The 2018 Farm Bill permanently removed “hemp” from the purview of the Controlled Substances Act, and accordingly, the Drug Enforcement Administration (“DEA”) no longer has any claim to interfere with the interstate commerce of hemp products. Some of the immediate impact from this legislation includes the ability for farmers to access crop insurance and U.S. Department of Agriculture programs for certification and competitive grants. While the DEA is now officially not involved in hemp regulation, the FDA retains its authority to regulate ingestible and topical products, including those that contain hemp and hemp extracts such as CBD.
A range of federal regulations govern any potential product development, manufacturing, distribution, sales and marketing, including the Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act of 1994 (the “DSHEA”). Under DSHEA, supplements are effectively regulated by the FDA for Good Manufacturing Practices under 21 CFR Part 111. DSHEA defines a “dietary supplement” as a product intended to supplement the diet that contains one or more of the following: (a) a vitamin; (b) a mineral; (c) an herb or other botanical; (d) an amino acid; (e) a dietary substance for use by man to supplement the diet by increasing the total dietary intake; or (f) a concentrate, metabolite, constituent, extract, or combination of any ingredient described in clause (a) through (e). Thus, the law permits a wide range of dietary ingredients in dietary supplements, including CBD which is an extract of a botanical (Cannabis sativa L. plant). CBD also falls under clause (e) as it is a dietary substance for use by man to supplement the diet by increasing the total dietary intake.
Blockchain and Cryptomining
Government regulation of blockchain and cryptocurrency mining industries is being actively considered by the United States federal government via several agencies and regulatory bodies as well as similar entities in other countries. State government regulations also may apply to the Company’s activities and other activities in which the Company participates or may participate in the future. Other regulatory bodies are governmental or semi-governmental and have shown an interest in regulating or investigating companies engaged in the blockchain or cryptocurrency mining business.
Businesses that are engaged in the transmission and custody of bitcoin and other digital assets, including brokers and custodians, can be subject to the regulations of the U.S. Department of the Treasury (the “Treasury”) as money services businesses as well as state money transmitter licensing requirements. Bitcoin and other digital assets are subject to anti-fraud regulations under federal and state commodity laws, and digital asset derivative instruments are substantively regulated by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission. Certain jurisdictions, including, among others, the State of New York and a number of countries outside the United States, have developed regulatory requirements specifically for digital assets and companies that transact in them.
Regulations may change substantially in the future, and it is presently not possible to know how regulations will apply to the Company’s business or when they will become effective. As the regulatory and legal environments evolve, The Company may become subject to new laws and further regulation by the SEC and other agencies, which may affect its mining and other activities. For instance, various bills have been proposed in the U.S. Congress related to The Company’s business, which may be adopted and have an impact on the Company. See “Risk Factors” for additional discussion regarding the Company’s belief about the potential risks that existing and future regulations pose to its business.
On March 2, 2022, the United States announced plans to establish a unified federal regulatory regime for cryptocurrency, and a group of United States Senators sent a letter to the United States Treasury Department asking Treasury Secretary Yellen to investigate Treasury’s ability to monitor and restrict the use of cryptocurrencies to evade sanctions imposed by the United States.
In September 2022, the White House issued a report regarding the Climate and Energy Implications of Crypto-Assets in the United States. The report states that the Department of Energy and Environmental Protection Agency should initiate a process to solicit data and develop environmental performance and energy conservation standards for crypto-asset technologies, including mining equipment. Should such measures prove ineffective at achieving the Administration’s environmental goals, the report calls for the Administration to explore executive actions and legislation to limit or eliminate the use of high energy intensity consensus mechanisms for crypto-asset mining.
We are unable to predict the impact that any new standards, legislation, or regulations may have on our business at the time of filing this Annual Report. We continue to monitor and proactively engage in dialogue on regulatory and legislative matters related to our industry.
Further, in December 2022 the SEC’s Division of Corporation Finance issued guidance advising companies to disclose exposure and risk to the cryptocurrency market. While the focus is on digital asset managers and exchanges, and not bitcoin miners, the failure of such large asset managers and exchanges may create increased price volatility of bitcoin. the Company does not store our bitcoin on such exchanges; however, we may be impacted by such failures.
In January 2023, the Federal Reserve, Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, and Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation issued a joint statement discouraging banks from doing business with clients in crypto-asset industries. In January 2023, the Federal Reserve also issued a policy statement broadening its authority to cover state-chartered banks.
Also in January 2023, the House of Representatives announced its first ever Financial Services Subcommittee on Digital Assets and the intention to develop a regulatory framework for the digital asset industry. The bipartisan leadership of the Senate Banking Committee announced that goal as well.
As the regulatory and legal environment evolves, we may become subject to new laws, such as further regulation by the SEC and other agencies, which may affect our mining and other activities. For additional discussion regarding our belief about the potential risks existing and future regulation pose to our business, see Part I, Item 1A. “Risk Factors” of this Annual Report.
Additionally, we are subject to numerous federal, state and local environmental laws and regulations. Numerous governmental agencies, such as the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and analogous state and provincial agencies issue regulations to implement and enforce these laws, which often require stringent and costly compliance measures. These laws and regulations may, among other things, require the acquisition of permits; govern the amounts and types of substances that may be released into the environment in connection with our operations; restrict the way we handle or dispose of our materials and wastes; or require investigatory and remedial actions. Failure to comply with these laws and regulations may result in the assessment of substantial administrative, civil and criminal penalties, the imposition of investigatory, remedial or corrective action obligations, or the possible issuance of injunctions limiting or prohibiting our activities. In addition, some laws and regulations relating to the protection of the environment may, in certain circumstances, impose liability for environmental damages and cleanup costs without regard to negligence or fault. Complying with these regulatory requirements may increase our cost of doing business and consequently affect our profitability. Moreover, environmental laws and regulations have been subject to frequent changes over the years, and the imposition of more stringent requirements could have a material adverse effect upon our capital expenditures, earnings or our competitive position. We believe that our existing environmental control procedures are adequate and we have no current plans for substantial capital expenditures in this area that would materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations.
Environmental Matters
Compliance with federal, state and local requirements regulating the discharge of materials into the environment, or otherwise relating to the protection of the environment, have not had, nor are they expected to have, any material effect on the capital expenditures, earnings or competitive position of the Company.
Employees
We had 11 employees as of December 31, 2022, including our named executive officers. None of our employees are covered by collective bargaining agreements, and we have not experienced any strikes or work stoppages related to labor relation issues. We believe we have good relations with our employees. We also utilize seasonal part-time employees during peak hemp processing season and contractors to provide certain specialized skills and expertise that may be required from time to time.
Where You Can Find More Information
We file annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy statements and other information required by the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). You may read and copy any document we file with the SEC at the SEC’s public reference room located at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549, U.S.A. Please call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 for further information on the public reference room. Our SEC filings are also available to the public from the SEC’s internet site at http://www.sec.gov.
On our Internet website, http://www.genhempinc.com, we post the following recent filings as soon as reasonably practicable after they are electronically filed with or furnished to the SEC: our annual reports on Form 10-K, our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, our current reports on Form 8-K, and any amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act.

---

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
Item 1A. Risk Factors
Our business involves certain risks and uncertainties. The following is a description of significant risks that might cause our future financial condition or results of operations to differ materially from those expected. In addition to the risks and uncertainties described below, we may face other risks and uncertainties, some of which may be unknown to us and some of which we may deem immaterial. If one or more of these risks or uncertainties occur, our business, financial condition or results of operations may be materially and adversely affected.
Risks Related to Our Business
There is substantial doubt that we will be able to continue as a going concern.
Our independent registered public accounting firm’s auditors’ report includes an explanatory paragraph stating that there is substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. We have had substantial losses since inception and as of December 31, 2022, and the date of this report we have minimal cash reserves. While we are beginning to generate increasing revenue and a positive cash flow, our ability to build significant cash reserves and continue as a going concern over the long term remains unproven. In the event that we are forced to reduce operations or seriously curtail our business, an investor will lose all money invested.
We have a history of significant losses, which we expect to continue, and we may never achieve nor maintain profitability.
We have incurred significant net losses since our formation and may continue to incur net losses for the foreseeable future as we complete our acquisition efforts. We incurred net losses of $7.0 million and $9.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. To date, we have not generated any significant revenues from the hemp business. If we are unsuccessful in implementing our strategic plan we may never become profitable.
Business interruptions resulting from the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) outbreak or similar public health crises could cause a disruption of the development of our product candidates and adversely impact our business.
In March 2020, the World Health Organization declared the novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) outbreak a global pandemic. To limit the spread of COVID-19, governments have taken various actions including the issuance of stay-at-home orders and physical distancing guidelines. Accordingly, businesses have adjusted, reduced or suspended operating activities. We may experience disruptions as a result of COVID-19 that could severely impact our business and planned acquisition strategy, including:
● challenges related to ongoing and increased operational expenses related to the COVID-19 pandemic;
● delays, difficulties or increased costs to comply with COVID-19 protocols;
● limitations in resources that would otherwise be focused on the conduct of our business, including because of sickness or the desire to avoid contact with large groups of people or as a result of government-imposed “Stay-at-Home” orders or similar working restrictions;
● delays in receiving the supplies and materials needed to operate our business;
● interruption in global shipping that may affect the transport of materials or our supply chain;
● changes in regulations as part of a response to the COVID-19 pandemic which may require us to change the ways in which our business may be conducted, or which may result in unexpected costs;
● delays in necessary interactions with regulators and other important governmental agencies and contractors due to limitations in employee resources or forced furlough of personnel; and
● increased competition for suppliers and vendors.
We will continue to assess the impact that COVID-19 may have on our ability to effectively conduct our business operations as planned and there can be no assurance that we will be able to avoid a material impact on our business from the spread of COVID-19 or its consequences, including disruption to our business and downturns in business sentiment generally or in our industry. Should COVID-19 cases in USA increase, the country or states may institute stricter social distancing protocols.
The global outbreak of COVID-19 continues to rapidly evolve. The extent to which the COVID-19 pandemic impacts our business will depend on future developments such as the rate of the spread of the disease, travel restrictions and social distancing in the United States and other countries, business closures or business disruptions and the effectiveness of actions taken in the United States and other countries to contain and treat the disease and to address its impact, including on financial markets or otherwise. Further, a lack of coordinated response on risk mitigation and vaccination deployment with respect to the COVID-19 pandemic on a local or federal level could result in significant increases to the duration and severity of the pandemic in the United States as compared to the rest of the world and could have a corresponding negative impact on our business. While the extent of the impact of the current COVID-19 pandemic on our business and financial results is uncertain, a continued and prolonged public health crisis such as the COVID-19 pandemic could have a material negative impact on our business, financial condition and operating results.
To the extent the COVID-19 pandemic adversely affects our business, financial condition and operating results, it may also have the effect of heightening many of the risks described in this “Risk Factors” section.
Unfavorable global economic or political conditions could adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations.
Our results of operations could be adversely affected by general conditions in the global economy and in the global financial markets. A global financial crisis or a global or regional political disruption could cause extreme volatility in the capital and credit markets. For example, outbreaks of epidemic, pandemic, or contagious diseases, such as the recent COVID-19 outbreak, could disrupt our business. Business disruptions could include disruptions to the productivity of our employees working remotely and restrictions on their travel may hinder their ability to meet with potential customers and close transactions, as well as temporary closures of the facilities of suppliers or contract growers as we try to develop our supply chain. In addition, the COVID-19 outbreak may result in a severe economic downturn and has already significantly affected the financial markets of many countries. A severe or prolonged economic downturn or political disruption could result in a variety of risks to our business, including our ability to raise capital when needed on acceptable terms, if at all. A weak or declining economy or political disruption could also strain our operations, possibly resulting in a future supply disruption, or cause our future customers to delay making payments for our services. Any of the foregoing could harm our business and we cannot anticipate all of the ways in which the political or economic climate and financial market conditions could adversely impact our business.
We have a limited operating history and operate under the professional guidance of our Chairman and CEO.
Our ability to achieve consistent cash flow and profitability depends upon the continued service of Gary C. Evans. Mr. Evans is our Chairman and CEO, largest shareholder, and the primary management level executive.
Our business plan provides that we will grow the Company’s asset base and revenues rapidly and ultimately deliver a positive cash flow generating company.
We may not be able to generate predictable and continuous revenue in the future. Further, there is no assurance that we will ever grow operations in the manner contemplated.
We may incur significant operating losses in the future, due to the expansion of our operations or other factors. There is no assurance that we can expand under terms that permit profitable operations over the long term. Failure to generate sufficient revenue to pay expenses as they come due may make us unable to continue as a going concern and result in the failure of our company and the complete loss of any money invested to purchase our shares.
We may be unable to manage our growth or implement our expansion strategy, especially in the bitcoin industry.
As a public company, our expenses include, but are not limited to, annual audits, legal costs, SEC reporting costs, costs of a transfer agent and the costs associated with fees and compliance. Further, our management will need to invest significant time and energy to stay current with the public company responsibilities of our business and may from time to time have diminished time available to apply to other tasks necessary to our survival and growth.
It is therefore possible that the financial and time burdens of operating as a public company will cause us to fail to achieve profitability. If we exhaust our funds, our business will fail and our investors will lose all money invested in our stock.
If we fail to pay public company costs, as such costs are incurred; we could become delinquent in our reporting obligations and face the delisting of our shares.
It is essential that we grow our overall business, achieve significant profits and maintain adequate cash flow in order to pay the cost of remaining a public entity which includes but is not limited the costs of remaining current with SEC reporting obligations.
The issuance of additional shares of our common stock may be necessary for the implementation of our growth strategy.
Limited private placement of restricted shares of our common stock has been completed from time to time when deemed necessary. Cash generated in prior years was used to acquire cannabis zoned real property, finance our office space and provide working capital. Issuance of any additional securities pursuant to future fundraising activities undertaken may significantly dilute the ownership of existing shareholders and may reduce the price of our common stock.
We acquired, improved and leased our Denver warehouse to a licensed third party hemp seed grower. Rental payments are current and the warehouse is presently reflecting positive cash flow.
While we have been able to acquire a warehouse in Denver, Colorado with owner financing, future acquisitions may require financial resources well in excess of our present balance sheet. Failure to successfully obtain additional funding would likely jeopardize our ability to expand our hemp business and related operations.
The loss of our chief executive officer or key management personnel or inability to attract and retain the necessary personnel could have a material adverse effect upon our business, financial condition or results of operations.
Our success is heavily dependent on the continued active participation of our chief executive officer, largest shareholder, and sole director listed under “Management.” Loss of the services of Mr. Evans, would have a material adverse effect upon our business, financial condition or results of operations. Further, our success and achievement of our growth plans depend on our ability to recruit, hire, train and retain other highly qualified technical, professional, clerical, administrative and managerial personnel. Inability to attract and retain the necessary personnel, consultants and advisors could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.
Our Chief Executive Officer has significant influence over us.
Our Chief Executive Officer has the ability to influence all of our business affairs.
It is likely that conflicts of interest may arise in the day-to- day operations of our business. Such conflicts, if not properly resolved, could have a material negative impact on our business.
In the past, the Company has issued shares for cash and services at prices which were solely determined by prior management. At that time, management made a determination of both the value of the exchange for our shares, and, as well, the price per share used in the capital raising effort. Transactions of this nature were not made at arm’s length and were made without input from a knowledgeable and non-interested third party. Future transactions of a like nature could dilute the percentage ownership of the company owned by a given investor. While the company believes its past transactions were appropriate, and plans to act in good faith in the future, an investor in our shares will have no ability to alter such transactions as they may occur in the future and, further, will not be consulted by the company in advance of any such transactions. An investor who is unwilling to endure such potential dilution should not purchase our shares.
Adverse outcomes in any future legal proceedings could subject us to substantial damages and adversely affect our results of operations and profitability.
We may become party to legal proceedings, including matters involving personnel and employment issues, personal injury, environmental matters, and other proceedings. Some of these potential proceedings could result in substantial damages or payment awards that exceed our insurance coverage. We will estimate our exposure to any future legal proceedings and establish provisions for the estimated liabilities where it is reasonably possible to estimate and where an adverse outcome is probable. Assessing and predicting the outcome of these matters will involve substantial uncertainties. Furthermore, even if the outcome is ultimately in our favor, our costs associated with such litigation may be material. Adverse outcomes in future legal proceedings or the costs and expenses associated therewith could have an adverse effect on our results of operations.
We will seek to expand through acquisitions of and investments in various brands, businesses, and assets in the Hemp sector. These acquisition activities may be unsuccessful or divert management’s attention.
We will consider strategic and complementary acquisitions of and investments in other brands, businesses or other assets in the hemp sector, and such acquisitions or investments are subject to risks that could affect our business, including risks related to:
● the necessity of coordinating geographically disparate organizations;
● implementing common systems and controls;
● integrating personnel with diverse business and cultural backgrounds;
● integrating acquired manufacturing and production facilities, technology and products;
● unanticipated expenses related to integration, including technical and operational integration;
● increased costs and unanticipated liabilities, including with respect to registration, environmental, health and safety matters, that may affect sales and operating results;
● retaining key employees;
● obtaining required government and third-party approvals;
● legal limitations in new jurisdictions;
● installing effective internal controls and audit procedures;
● issuing common stock that could dilute the interests of our existing stockholders;
● spending cash and incurring debt;
● assuming contingent liabilities; and
● creating additional expenses.
We may not be able to identify opportunities or complete transactions on commercially reasonable terms, or at all, or actually realize any anticipated benefits from such acquisitions or investments. Similarly, we may not be able to obtain financing for acquisitions or investments on attractive terms. In addition, the success of any acquisitions or investments also will depend, in part, on our ability to integrate the acquisition or investment with our then existing operations.
We risk insolvency if revenues decline sharply and we are unable pay our bills and unable to timely locate and negotiate a suitable business combination or capital injection.
Management is always concerned over potentially unfavorable events and related sharp reductions in revenues. If such problems occur, we will first reduce expenses, conserve cash and endeavor to replace lost revenue. In anticipation of possible problems of this nature, and alternatively to grow our business when opportunity presents, management has continued its negotiations in connection with potential business combinations and continues to explore other means of raising cash. Our goal is to develop cash reserves, either for expansion, or to cover shortfalls in revenue. Management believes that ultimately, consummation of one or more such transactions would serve the best interests of shareholders; however, there is no assurance that we can locate or consummate a suitable business combination or otherwise provide for liquidity, expanded working capital and a stronger balance sheet.
We are subject to corporate governance and internal control reporting requirements, and our costs related to compliance with, or our failure to comply with existing and future requirements, could adversely affect our business.
We face corporate governance requirements under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as well as new rules and regulations subsequently adopted by the SEC and the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board. These laws, rules and regulations continue to evolve and may become increasingly stringent in the future. In particular, under new SEC rules we will be required to include management’s report on internal controls as part of our annual report pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Furthermore, under the proposed rules, an attestation report on our internal controls from our independent registered public accounting firm will be required as part of our annual report. We are in the process of evaluating our control structure to help ensure that we will be able to comply with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. The financial cost of compliance with these laws, rules and regulations is expected to be substantial. We cannot assure you that we will be able to fully comply with these laws, rules and regulations that address corporate governance, internal control reporting and similar matters. Failure to comply with these laws, rules and regulations could materially adversely affect our reputation, financial condition and the value of our securities.
Management identified a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting related to the accounting for complex transactions. The Company has begun the process of designing and implementing measures to improve its internal controls over financial reporting and remediate this material weakness. The Company’s efforts include implementing additional reviews of business combination transactions and modifying the Company’s instructions to valuation specialists and reviews of their workproduct. This will include staffing additions as appropriate. We will consider the material weakness remediated after the applicable controls operate for a sufficient period of time, and management has concluded, through testing, that the controls are operating effectively. However, our remedial actions may not prevent this or similar weaknesses from occurring in the future.
Natural and other disasters, information technology system failures and network disruptions and cybersecurity breaches and attacks could adversely affect our business.
Our business and results of operations could be negatively affected by certain factors beyond our control, such as natural disasters and/or climate change-related events (such as hurricanes, earthquakes, fires, and floods); civil unrest; negative geopolitical conditions and developments; war, terrorism, or other man-made disasters; and information technology system failures, network disruptions and cybersecurity breaches and attacks. Any of these events could result in, among other things, damage to or the temporary closure of our facilities; a temporary lack of an adequate work force in one or more markets; an interruption in power supply; a temporary or long-term disruption in our supply chain; and short- or long-term damage to our prospective customers’ businesses (which would adversely impact demand for our products and services). ∙ We rely on our own information systems, as well as those of our third-party business partners and suppliers. Despite the introduction of system backup measures and engage in information system redundancy planning and processes, such measures, planning and processes may be ineffective or inadequate to address all eventualities.
Further, our information systems and our business partners’ and suppliers’ information systems may be vulnerable to attacks by hackers and other security breaches, including computer viruses and malware, through the internet (including via devices and applications connected to the internet), email attachments and persons with access to these information systems, such as our employees or third parties with whom we do business. As information systems and the use of software and related applications by us, our business partners, suppliers, and customers become more cloud-based and connected to the internet, there has been an increase in global cybersecurity vulnerabilities and threats, including more sophisticated and targeted cyber-related attacks that pose a risk to the security of our information systems and networks and the confidentiality, availability and integrity of data and information. Any such attack or breach could compromise our networks and the information stored thereon could be accessed, publicly disclosed, lost, or stolen.
If we or our business partners or suppliers were to experience a system disruption, attack or security breach that impacts any of our critical functions, or our customers were to experience a system disruption, attack or security breach via any of our connected products and services, it could result in a period of shutdown of information systems during which we may not be able to operate, the loss of sales and customers, financial misstatement, potential liability for damages to our customers, reputational damage and significant incremental costs, which could adversely affect our business, results of operations and profitability. Furthermore, any access to, public disclosure of, or other loss of data or information (including any of our confidential or proprietary information or personal data or information) as a result of an attack or security breach could result in governmental actions or private claims or proceedings, which could damage our reputation, cause a loss of confidence in our products and services, damage our ability to develop (and protect our rights to) our proprietary technologies and adversely affect our business.
Failure to comply with U.S. federal, state and international laws and regulations relating to privacy or data protection, or the expansion of current or the enactment of new laws or regulations relating to privacy or data protection, could adversely affect our business and our financial condition.
Failure to comply with U.S. federal, state and international laws and regulations relating to privacy or data protection, or the expansion of current or the enactment of new laws or regulations relating to privacy or data protection, could adversely affect our business and our financial condition. A variety of U.S. federal, state and international laws and regulations govern the collection, use, retention, sharing and security of data. Laws and regulations relating to privacy and data protection are evolving and subject to potentially differing interpretations. These requirements may be interpreted and applied in a manner that is inconsistent from one jurisdiction to another or may conflict with other rules or our practices. As a result, our practices may not have complied or may not comply in the future with all such laws, regulations, requirements and obligations. Any failure, or perceived failure, by us to comply with our posted privacy policies or with any federal, state or international privacy or data protection related laws, regulations, industry self-regulatory principles, industry standards or codes of conduct, regulatory guidance, orders to which we may be subject or other legal obligations relating to privacy or data protection could adversely affect our reputation and business, and may result in claims, proceedings or actions against us by governmental entities or others or other liabilities or require us to change our operations and/or cease using certain data sets. Any such claim, proceeding or action could hurt our reputation and business, force us to incur significant expenses in defense of such proceedings, distract our management, increase our costs of doing business, result in a loss of customers.
Uncertain Economic, Social and Political Environment.
Consumer, corporate and financial confidence may be adversely affected by current or future tensions around the world, fear of terrorist activity and/or military conflicts, localized or global financial crises or other sources of political, social or economic unrest. Such erosion of confidence may lead to or extend a localized or global economic downturn. A climate of uncertainty may reduce the availability of potential investment opportunities, and increases the difficulty of modeling market conditions, potentially reducing the accuracy of financial projections. In addition, limited availability of credit for consumers, homeowners and businesses, including credit used to acquire businesses, in an uncertain environment or economic downturn may have an adverse effect on the economy generally and on our ability to make acquisitions. This may slow or halt our rate of growth and materially and adversely affect our business and/or stock price.
The Company will incur expenses in connection with its SEC filing requirements and may not be able to meet such costs, which could jeopardize its filing status with the SEC.
As a public reporting company, the Company is required to meet the filing requirements of the SEC. The Company may see an increase in its legal, accounting, auditing and fees and expenses as a result of such requirements. Our costs will increase significantly as the Company expands operations. Our filings are subject to comment from the SEC on its filings and/or it is required to file supplemental filings for transactions and activities. If the Company is not compliant in meeting the filing requirements of the SEC, it could lose its status as a 1934 Act Company, which could compromise its ability to raise funds.
Risks Related to our Activities in the Legal Hemp Industry
We will be subject to a myriad of different laws and regulations governing hemp and bitcoin. Our inability to comply with such laws in a cost-effective manner may have an adverse effect on our business and result of operations.
Laws and regulations governing the use of hemp in the United States are broad in scope; subject to evolving interpretations; and subject to enforcement by a myriad of regulatory agencies and law enforcement entities. Under the Agriculture Improvement Act of 2018, also known as the 2018 Farm Bill, a state or Indian tribe that desires to have primary regulatory authority over the production of hemp in the state or territory of the Indian tribe must submit a plan to monitor and regulate hemp production to the Secretary of the USDA. The Secretary must then approve the state or tribal plan after determining if the plan complies with the requirements set forth in the Agriculture Improvement Act of 2018. The Secretary may also audit the state or Indian tribe’s compliance with the federally-approved plan. If the Secretary does not approve the state or Indian tribe’s plan, then the production of hemp in that state or territory of that Indian tribe will be subject to a plan established by USDA. USDA has not yet established such a plan. We anticipate that many states will seek to have primary regulatory authority over the production of hemp. States that seek such authority may create new laws and regulations that limit or restrict the use of hemp.
Federal and state laws and regulations on hemp may address production, monitoring, manufacturing, distribution, and laboratory testing to ensure that that the hemp has a delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol concentration of not more than 0.3% on a dry weight basis. Federal laws and regulations may also address the transportation or shipment of hemp or hemp products, as the Agriculture Improvement Act of 2018 prohibits states and Indian tribes from prohibiting the transportation or shipment of hemp or hemp products produced in accordance with that law through the state or territory of the Indian tribe, as applicable. We may be subject to many different state-based regulatory regimens for hemp, all of which could require us to incur substantial costs associated with compliance requirements. Our operations will be restricted to only where such operations are legal on the local, state and federal levels.
In addition, it is possible that additional regulations may be enacted in the future in the United States and globally that will be directly applicable to research and development operations.
We cannot predict the nature of any future laws, regulations, interpretations, or applications, nor can we determine what effect additional governmental regulations or administrative policies and procedures, when and if promulgated, could have on our business.
We have a limited operating history in the legal hemp industry, which makes it difficult to accurately assess our future growth prospects.
The legal hemp and cannabis industry is an evolving industry that may not develop as expected. Furthermore, our operations will continue to evolve as we continually assess new strategic opportunities for our business within this industry. Assessing the future prospects of this industry is challenging in light of both known and unknown risks and difficulties we may encounter.
Growth prospects in the legal hemp and cannabis industry can be affected by a wide variety of factors including:
● Competition from other similar companies;
● Fluctuations in the market price of CBD oil;
● Regulatory limitations on the types of research and development with respect to cannabis;
● Other changes in the regulation of cannabis and legal hemp use; and
● Changes in underlying consumer behavior, which may affect the demand of our legal hemp and cannabis traits.
We may not be able to successfully address the above factors, which could negatively impact our intended business plans.
Negative press from being in the hemp/cannabis space could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
The hemp plant and the cannabis/marijuana plant are both part of the same cannabis sativa genus/species of plant, except that hemp, by definition, has less than 0.3% THC content, but the same plant with a higher THC content is cannabis/marijuana, which is legal under certain state laws, but which is not legal under federal law. The similarities between these plants can cause confusion, and our activities with legal hemp may be incorrectly perceived as us being involved in federally illegal cannabis. Also, despite growing support for the cannabis industry and legalization of cannabis in certain U.S. states, many individuals and businesses remain opposed to the cannabis industry. Any negative press resulting from any incorrect perception that we have entered into the cannabis space could result in a loss of current or future business. It could also adversely affect the public’s perception of us and lead to reluctance by new parties to do business with us or to own our common stock. We cannot assure you that additional business partners, including but not limited to financial institutions and customers, will not attempt to end or curtail their relationships with us. Any such negative press or cessation of business could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Risks Relating to Digital Asset Networks and Digital Assets
Digital assets, such as bitcoin, may become regulated as securities or investment securities.
Bitcoin is the oldest and most well-known form of digital asset. Bitcoin and other forms of digital assets / cryptocurrencies have been the source of much regulatory scrutiny, which has resulted in differing definitional outcomes without a single unifying statement. In the context of the offer and sale of the Initial Coin Offering (“ICO”) tokens, the SEC has determined certain digital tokens are securities under the Howey test as stated by the U.S. Supreme Court. ICO offerings of securities would require registration under the Securities Act or an available exemption therefrom for offers or sales in the United States to be lawful. Section 5(a) of the Securities Act provides that, unless a registration statement is in effect as to a security, it is unlawful for any person, directly or indirectly, to engage in the offer or sale of securities in interstate commerce. Furthermore, Section 5(c) of the Securities Act provides a similar prohibition against offers to sell, or offers to buy, unless a registration statement has been filed. Although the Company does not believe its mining activities require registration for it to conduct such activities and accumulate digital assets, the SEC, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (the “CFTC”), Nasdaq or other governmental or quasi- governmental agency or organization may conclude that the Company’s activities involve the offer or sale of “securities,” or ownership of “investment securities,” and the Company may face regulation under the Securities Act or the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “Investment Company Act”). Such regulation or the inability to meet the requirements to continue operations would have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations.
The further development and acceptance of digital asset networks and other digital assets, which represent a new and rapidly changing industry, are subject to a variety of factors that are difficult to evaluate, and the slowing or stopping of the development or acceptance of digital asset systems may adversely affect the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations.
Digital assets such as bitcoins, which may be used, among other things, to buy and sell goods and services are a new and rapidly evolving industry of which the digital asset networks are prominent, but not unique, parts. The growth of the digital asset industry in general, and the digital asset networks of bitcoin in particular, are subject to a high degree of uncertainty. The factors affecting the further development of the digital asset industry, as well as the digital asset networks, include, among others:
● continued worldwide growth in the adoption and use of bitcoins and other digital assets;
● government and quasi-government regulation of bitcoins and other digital assets and their use, or restrictions on or regulation of access to and operation of the digital asset network or similar digital assets systems;
● the maintenance and development of the open-source software protocol of the bitcoin network;
● changes in consumer demographics and public tastes and preferences;
● the availability and popularity of other forms or methods of buying and selling goods and services, including new means of using fiat currencies;
● general economic conditions and the regulatory environment relating to digital assets; and
● the impact of regulators focusing on digital assets and digital securities and the costs associated with such regulatory oversight.
A decline in the popularity or acceptance of the digital asset networks of bitcoin, or similar digital asset systems, could adversely affect the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations.
If demand for transactions in bitcoin declines and is replaced by new demand for other cryptocurrencies, the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected.
The Company’s business will be highly dependent on strong bitcoin demand relative to other cryptocurrencies in the market. As such, in addition to the factors impacting the broader crypto economy described elsewhere in this section, the Company’s business may be adversely affected, and growth in the Company’s, and therefore the Company’s, revenues may slow or decline, if market demand for bitcoin deteriorates and is supplanted by other cryptocurrencies such as ethereum and dogecoin. In addition, negative perceptions surrounding bitcoin relative to other cryptocurrencies may cause bitcoin to fall out of favor. If other cryptocurrencies, such as ethereum and dogecoin, surpass bitcoin in market demand over a sustained period of time, such a trend could harm the Company’s business. Competition from public and central bank backed digital currencies could undercut the need for other cryptocurrencies such as bitcoin. Competition from stablecoins (commodity-backed or fiat-backed) could undercut demand for other cryptocurrencies such as bitcoin.
Significant contributors to all or any digital asset network could propose amendments to the respective network’s protocols and software that, if accepted and authorized by such network, could adversely affect the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations.
Digital asset networks are open-source projects and, although there is an influential group of leaders in, for example, the bitcoin network community known as the “Core Developers,” there is no official developer or group of developers that formally controls the bitcoin network. Any individual can download the bitcoin network software and make any desired modifications, which are proposed to users and miners on the bitcoin network through software downloads and upgrades, typically posted to the bitcoin development forum on GitHub.com. Proposals for upgrades and discussions relating thereto take place on online forums. For example, there is an ongoing debate regarding altering the blockchain by increasing the size of blocks to accommodate a larger volume of transactions. Although some proponents support an increase, other market participants oppose an increase to the block size as it may deter miners from confirming transactions and concentrate power into a smaller group of miners. To the extent that a significant majority of the users and miners on the bitcoin network install such software upgrade, the bitcoin network would be subject to new protocols and software that may adversely affect the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations.
In the event a developer or group of developers proposes a modification to the bitcoin network that is not accepted by a majority of miners and users, but that is nonetheless accepted by a substantial plurality of miners and users, two or more competing and incompatible blockchain implementations could result. This is known as a “hard fork.” We may not be able to realize the economic benefit of such a “hard fork”, either immediately or ever, which could adversely affect an investment in our securities. If we hold a cryptocurrency at the time of a hard fork, industry standards would dictate that we would be expected to hold an equivalent amount of the old and new assets following the fork. However, we may not be able, or it may not be practical, to secure or realize the economic benefit of the new asset for various reasons. For instance, we may determine that there is no safe or practical way to custody the new asset, that trying to do so may pose an unacceptable risk to our holdings in the old asset, or that the costs of taking possession and/or maintaining ownership of the new cryptocurrency exceed the benefits of owning the new cryptocurrency. Additionally, laws, regulation or other factors may prevent us from benefitting from the new asset even if there is a safe and practical way to custody and secure the new asset. In such case, the “hard fork” in the blockchain could materially and adversely affect the perceived value of digital assets as reflected on one or both incompatible blockchains, which may adversely affect the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations and, in the worst-case scenario, harm the sustainability of the bitcoin network’s economy.
The open-source structure of the bitcoin network protocol means that the contributors to the protocol are generally not directly compensated for their contributions in maintaining and developing the bitcoin network protocol, and a failure to properly monitor and upgrade the protocol could damage the bitcoin network and adversely affect the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations.
The bitcoin network operates based on an open-source protocol, not represented by an official organization or authority. Instead, it is maintained by a group of core contributors, largely on the Bitcoin Core project on GitHub. As an open-source project, bitcoin is not represented by an official organization or authority. As the bitcoin network protocol is not sold and its use does not generate revenues for contributors, contributors are generally not directly compensated for maintaining and developing the bitcoin network protocol. Although the Media Lab’s Digital Currency Initiative of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology funds the current maintainer Wladimir J. van der Laan, among others, this type of financial incentive is not typical. The lack of guaranteed financial incentive for contributors to maintain or develop the bitcoin network and the lack of guaranteed resources to adequately address emerging issues with the bitcoin network may reduce incentives to address the issues adequately or in a timely manner.
Changes to a digital asset network which the Company is mining on may adversely affect the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations.
If a malicious actor or botnet obtains control in excess of 50% of the processing power active on any digital asset network, including the bitcoin network, it is possible that such actor or botnet could manipulate the blockchain in a manner that may adversely affect the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations.
If a malicious actor or botnet (a volunteer or hacked collection of computers controlled by networked software coordinating the actions of the computers) obtains a majority of the processing power dedicated to mining on any digital asset network, including the bitcoin network, it may be able to alter the blockchain by constructing alternate blocks if it is able to solve for such blocks faster than the remainder of the miners on the blockchain can add valid blocks. In such alternate blocks, the malicious actor or botnet could control, exclude or modify the ordering of transactions, though it could not generate new digital assets or transactions using such control. Using alternate blocks, the malicious actor could “double-spend” its own digital assets (i.e., spend the same digital assets in more than one transaction) and prevent the confirmation of other users’ transactions for so long as it maintains control. To the extent that such malicious actor or botnet does not yield its majority control of the processing power or the digital asset community does not reject the fraudulent blocks as malicious, reversing any changes made to the blockchain may not be possible, which may adversely affect the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations.
The approach towards and possible crossing of the 50% threshold indicates a greater risk that a single mining pool could exert authority over the validation of digital asset transactions. To the extent that the digital assets ecosystems do not act to ensure greater decentralization of digital asset mining processing power, the feasibility of a malicious actor obtaining in excess of 50% of the processing power on any digital asset network (e.g., through control of a large mining pool or through hacking such a mining pool) will increase, which may adversely affect the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations.
If the award of digital assets for solving blocks and transaction fees for recording transactions are not sufficiently high to cover expenses related to running data center operations, it may adversely affect the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations.
Bitcoin miners record transactions when they solve for and add blocks of information to the blockchain. When a miner solves for a block, it creates such block, which includes data relating to (i) the solution to the block, (ii) a reference to the prior block in the blockchain to which the new block is being added and (iii) all transactions that have occurred but have not yet been added to the blockchain. The miner becomes aware of outstanding, unrecorded transactions through data packet transmission and propagation. Typically, bitcoin transactions will be recorded in the next chronological block if the spending party has an internet connection and at least one minute has passed between the transaction’s data packet transmission and the solution of the next block. If a transaction is not recorded in the next chronological block, it is usually recorded in the next block thereafter.
As the award of new digital assets for solving blocks declines, and if transaction fees are not sufficiently high, miners may not have an adequate incentive to continue mining and may cease their mining operations. For example, the current fixed reward on the bitcoin network for solving a new block is six and a quarter (6.25) bitcoins per block. The reward decreased from twelve and a half (12.5) bitcoins in May 2020. It is estimated that it will halve again in approximately May 2024. This reduction may result in a reduction in the aggregate hashrate of the bitcoin network as the incentive for miners will decrease. Moreover, miners ceasing operations would reduce the aggregate hashrate on the bitcoin network, which would adversely affect the confirmation process for transactions (i.e., temporarily decreasing the speed at which blocks are added to the blockchain until the next scheduled adjustment in difficulty for block solutions) and make the bitcoin network more vulnerable to a malicious actor obtaining control in excess of 50% of the aggregate hashrate on the bitcoin network. Periodically, the bitcoin network has adjusted the difficulty for block solutions so that solution speeds remain in the vicinity of the expected ten-minute confirmation time targeted by the bitcoin network protocol.
The Company believes that from time to time there will be further considerations and adjustments to the bitcoin network and others regarding the difficulty for block solutions. More significant reductions in aggregate hashrate on digital asset networks could result in material, though temporary, delays in block solution confirmation time. Any reduction in confidence in the confirmation process or aggregate hashrate of any digital asset network may negatively impact the value of digital assets, which may adversely affect the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations.
To the extent that the profit margins of digital asset mining operations are not high, operators of digital asset mining operations are more likely to immediately sell their digital assets earned by mining in the digital asset exchange market, resulting in a reduction in the price of digital assets that may adversely affect the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations.
Over the past ten years, digital asset mining operations have evolved from individual users mining with computer processors, graphics processing units and first-generation servers. Currently, new processing power brought onto the digital asset networks is predominantly added by incorporated and unincorporated “professionalized” mining operations. Professionalized mining operations may use proprietary hardware or sophisticated machines. They require the investment of significant capital for the acquisition of this hardware, the leasing of operating space (often in data centers or warehousing facilities), incurrence of electricity costs and the employment of technicians to operate the mining farms. As a result, professionalized mining operations are of a greater scale than prior miners and have more defined, regular expenses and liabilities. These regular expenses and liabilities require professionalized mining operations to more immediately sell digital assets earned from mining operations on the digital asset exchange market, whereas it is believed that individual miners in past years were more likely to hold newly mined digital assets for more extended periods. The immediate selling of newly mined digital assets greatly increases the supply of digital assets on the digital asset exchange market, creating downward pressure on the price of each digital asset.
The extent to which the value of digital assets mined by a professionalized mining operation exceeds the allocable capital and operating costs determines the profit margin of such operation. A professionalized mining operation may be more likely to sell a higher percentage of its newly mined digital assets rapidly if it is operating at a low profit margin and it may partially or completely cease operations if its profit margin is negative. This could create a network effect that may further reduce the price of digital assets until mining operations with higher operating costs become unprofitable and remove mining power from the respective digital asset network. The network effect of reduced profit margins resulting in greater sales of newly mined digital assets could result in a reduction in the price of digital assets that may adversely affect the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations.
To the extent that any miners cease to record transactions in solved blocks, transactions that do not include the payment of a transaction fee will not be recorded on the blockchain until a block is solved by a miner who does not require the payment of transaction fees, and any widespread delays in the recording of transactions could result in a loss of confidence in that digital asset network, which may adversely affect the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations.
To the extent that any miners cease to record transactions in solved blocks, such transactions will not be recorded on the blockchain. Currently, there are no known incentives for miners to elect to exclude the recording of transactions in solved blocks. However, to the extent that any such incentives arise (e.g., a collective movement among miners or one or more mining pools forcing bitcoin users to pay transaction fees as a substitute for or in addition to the award of new bitcoins upon the solving of a block), actions of miners solving a significant number of blocks could delay the recording and confirmation of transactions on the blockchain. Any systemic delays in the recording and confirmation of transactions on the blockchain could result in greater exposure to double-spending transactions, or transactions that consist of bad actors simultaneously sending two or more bitcoin to different addresses, and a loss of confidence in certain or all digital asset networks, which may adversely affect the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations.
Intellectual property rights claims may adversely affect the operation of some or all digital asset networks.
Third parties may assert intellectual property claims relating to the holding and transfer of digital assets and their source code. Regardless of the merit of any intellectual property or other legal action, any threatened action that reduces confidence in some or all digital asset networks’ long-term viability or the ability of end-users to hold and transfer digital assets may adversely affect the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, a meritorious intellectual property claim could prevent the Company and other end-users from accessing some or all digital asset networks or holding or transferring their digital assets. As a result, an intellectual property claim against the Company or other large digital asset network participants may adversely affect the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations.
To the extent that the digital asset exchanges representing a substantial portion of the volume in digital asset trading are involved in fraud or experience security failures or other operational issues, such digital asset exchanges’ failures may result in a reduction in the price of some or all digital assets and may adversely affect the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations.
The digital asset exchanges on which the digital assets trade are new and, in most cases, largely unregulated. Furthermore, many digital asset exchanges (including several of the most prominent U.S. dollar denominated digital asset exchanges) do not provide the public with significant information regarding their ownership structure, management teams, corporate practices or regulatory compliance. As a result, the marketplace may lose confidence in, or may experience problems relating to, digital asset exchanges, including prominent exchanges handling a significant portion of the volume of digital asset trading. A lack of stability in the digital asset exchange market and the closure or temporary shutdown of digital asset exchanges due to fraud, business failure, hackers or malware or government-mandated regulation may reduce confidence in the digital asset networks and result in greater volatility in digital asset values. These potential consequences of a digital asset exchange’s failure may adversely affect the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations.
Political or economic crises may motivate large-scale sales of digital assets, which could result in a reduction in some or all digital assets’ values and adversely affect the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations.
As an alternative to fiat currencies that are backed by central governments, digital assets such as bitcoins, which are relatively new, are subject to supply and demand forces based upon the desirability of an alternative, decentralized means of buying and selling goods and services, and it is unclear how such supply and demand will be impacted by geopolitical events. Nevertheless, political or economic crises, including current or anticipated military conflicts such as the war between Russia and Ukraine, terrorism, sanctions or other geopolitical events globally, may motivate large-scale acquisitions or sales of digital assets either globally or locally. Large-scale sales of digital assets would result in a reduction in some or all digital assets’ values and may adversely affect the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations.
The Company’s ability to adopt technology in response to changing security needs or trends poses a challenge to the safekeeping of the Company’s digital assets.
The history of digital asset exchanges has shown that exchanges and large holders of digital assets must adapt to technological change in order to secure and safeguard their digital assets. The Company will rely on enterprise cold storage solutions from third parties to safeguard the Company’s digital assets from theft, loss, destruction or other issues relating to hackers and technological attack. The Company’s digital assets may also be moved to various exchanges in order to exchange them for fiat currency during which time the Company will be relying on the security of such exchanges to safeguard the Company’s digital assets.
The Company believes that it may become a more appealing target of security threats as the size of the Company’s bitcoin holdings grow. To the extent that either custody providers or the Company are unable to identify and mitigate or stop new security threats, the Company’s digital assets may be subject to theft, loss, destruction or other attack, which may adversely affect the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations.
Digital asset transactions are irrevocable, and stolen or incorrectly transferred digital assets may be irretrievable and, as a result, any incorrectly executed digital asset transactions may adversely affect the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations.
Digital asset transactions are not, from an administrative perspective, reversible without the consent and active participation of the recipient of the transaction or, in theory, control or consent of a majority of the processing power on the respective digital asset network. Once a transaction has been verified and recorded in a block that is added to the blockchain, an incorrect transfer of digital assets or a theft of digital assets generally will not be reversible, and the Company may not be capable of seeking compensation for any such transfer or theft. Although the Company’s transfers of digital assets will regularly be made to or from various parties, it is possible that, through computer or human error, or through theft or criminal action, the Company’s digital assets could be transferred in incorrect amounts or to unauthorized third parties. To the extent that the Company is unable to seek a corrective transaction with such third party or is incapable of identifying the third party which has received the Company’s digital assets through error or theft, the Company will be unable to revert or otherwise recover incorrectly transferred digital assets. To the extent that the Company is unable to seek redress for such error or theft, such loss may adversely affect the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations.
The limited rights of legal recourse against the Company, and the Company’s lack of insurance protection, expose the Company and its stockholders to the risk of loss of its digital assets for which no person is liable.
The digital assets held by the Company may not be insured. Therefore, a loss may be suffered with respect to the Company’s digital assets which is not covered by insurance and for which no person is liable in damages, which may adversely affect the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations.
The Company may not have adequate sources of recovery if its digital assets are lost, stolen or destroyed.
If the Company’s digital assets are lost, stolen or destroyed under circumstances rendering a party liable to the Company, the responsible party may not have the financial resources sufficient to satisfy its claim. For example, as to a particular event of loss, the only source of recovery for the Company might be limited, to the extent identifiable, other responsible third parties (e.g., a thief or terrorist), any of which may not have the financial resources (including liability insurance coverage) to satisfy a valid claim by the Company.
Digital assets held by the Company are not subject to FDIC or SIPC protections.
The Company will not hold its digital assets with a banking institution or a member of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) or the Securities Investor Protection Corporation (“SIPC”) and, therefore, its digital assets will not be subject to the protections enjoyed by depositors with FDIC or SIPC member institutions.
The loss or destruction of a private key required to access a digital asset may be irreversible and, as a result, the Company’s loss of access to its private keys or its experience of a data loss relating to its digital assets may adversely affect the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations.
Digital assets are controllable only by the possessor of both the unique public key and private key relating to the local or online digital wallet in which the digital assets are held. The Company is required by the operation of digital asset networks to publish the public key relating to a digital wallet in use when it first verifies a spending transaction from that digital wallet and disseminates such information into the respective network. The Company safeguards and keeps private the private keys relating to its digital assets by using enterprise cold storage custody solutions from third parties. To the extent a private key is lost, destroyed or otherwise compromised and no backup of the private key is accessible, the Company will be unable to access the digital assets held by it and the private key will not be capable of being restored by the respective digital asset network. Any loss of private keys relating to digital wallets used to store the Company’s digital assets may adversely affect the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations.
Because the Company’s future digital assets may be held by digital asset exchanges, it faces heightened risks from cybersecurity attacks and financial stability of digital asset exchanges.
The Company may transfer digital assets from its wallet to digital asset exchanges prior to selling them. Digital assets not held in the Company’s wallet are subject to the risks encountered by digital asset exchanges including a denial-of-service attack or other malicious hacking, a sale of the digital asset exchange, loss of the digital assets by the digital asset exchange and other risks similar to those described herein. The Company may not maintain a custodian agreement with any of the digital asset exchanges that hold the Company’s digital assets. These digital asset exchanges may or may not provide insurance and may lack the resources to protect against hacking and theft. If this were to occur, the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations may be adversely affected.
As the number of digital assets awarded for solving a block in the blockchain decreases, the incentive for miners to continue to contribute processing power to the respective digital asset network will transition from a set reward to transaction fees.
In order to incentivize miners to continue to contribute processing power to any digital asset network, such network may either formally or informally transition from a set reward to transaction fees earned upon solving for a block. This transition could be accomplished either by miners independently electing to record in the blocks they solve only those transactions that include payment of a transaction fee or by the digital asset network adopting software upgrades that require the payment of a minimum transaction fee for all transactions. If transaction fees paid for digital asset transactions become too high, the marketplace may be reluctant to accept digital assets as a means of payment and existing users may be motivated to switch from one digital asset to another digital asset or back to fiat currency. Decreased use and demand for bitcoins may adversely affect the value of the Company’s bitcoins and may adversely affect the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations.
The price of bitcoin may be influenced by regulatory, commercial and technical factors that are highly uncertain resulting in the price of bitcoin being extremely volatile, which may significantly influence the market price of the Company’s common stock.
To the extent investors view the value of the Company’s common stock as linked to the value or change in the value of bitcoin, fluctuations in the price of bitcoin may significantly influence the market price of the Company’s common stock. In addition, the Company’s business operations are no longer economical below the bitcoin breakeven point, or the point at which the total cost of mining operations exceeds the total revenues generated.
The price of bitcoin has historically been subject to dramatic fluctuations and is highly volatile. Bitcoin has only recently become accepted as a means of payment for goods and services and has recently trended toward becoming a more actively traded instrument, however the acceptance and use of bitcoin remains limited and far from mainstream. Conversely, a significant portion of demand for bitcoin may be generated by speculators and investors seeking to profit from the short- or long-term holding of bitcoin.
In addition, some blockchain industry participants have reported that a significant percentage of bitcoin trading activity is artificial or non-economic in nature and may represent attempts to manipulate the price of bitcoin. As a result, trading platforms may seek to inflate demand for bitcoin, which could increase the volatility of the price of bitcoin and may significantly influence the market price of the Company’s common stock.
The development and acceptance of competing blockchain platforms or technologies may cause consumers to use alternative distributed ledgers or other alternatives.
The development and acceptance of competing blockchain platforms or technologies, including competing cryptocurrencies which our miners may not be able to mine, such as cryptocurrencies being developed by popular social media platforms, online retailers, or government sponsored cryptocurrencies, may cause consumers to use alternative distributed ledgers or an alternative to distributed ledgers altogether. Our business currently intends to utilize presently existent digital ledgers and blockchains and we could face difficulty adapting to emergent digital ledgers, blockchains, or alternatives thereto. This may adversely affect us and our exposure to various blockchain technologies and prevent us from realizing the anticipated profits from our investments. Such circumstances could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects or operations and potentially the value of any bitcoin or other cryptocurrencies we mine or otherwise acquire or hold for our own account, which could materially and adversely affect investors’ investments in our securities.
The decentralized nature of cryptocurrency systems may lead to slow or inadequate responses to crises, which may negatively affect our business.
The decentralized nature of the governance of cryptocurrency systems may lead to ineffective decision making that slows development or prevents a network from overcoming emergent obstacles. Governance of many cryptocurrency systems is by voluntary consensus and open competition with no clear leadership structure or authority. To the extent lack of clarity in corporate governance of cryptocurrency systems leads to ineffective decision making that slows development and growth of such cryptocurrencies, the value of our common stock may be adversely affected.
Risks Relating to Regulatory Matters
We are subject to a highly-evolving regulatory landscape and any adverse changes to, or our failure to comply with, any laws and regulations could adversely affect our business, reputation, prospects or operations.
Until recently, relatively little regulatory attention has been directed toward bitcoin and the bitcoin network by U.S. federal and state governments, foreign governments and self-regulatory agencies. We currently only operate in the United States, and do not currently have any plans to expand our operations beyond the United States. As bitcoin has grown in popularity and in market size, the U.S. regulatory regime - namely the Federal Reserve Board, U.S. Congress and certain U.S. agencies (e.g., the SEC, the CFTC, FinCEN and the Federal Bureau of Investigation) have begun to examine the operations of the bitcoin network, bitcoin users and the bitcoin exchange market. The complexity and evolving nature of our business and the significant uncertainty surrounding the regulation of the cryptocurrency industry requires us to exercise our judgment as to whether certain laws, rules, and regulations apply to us, and it is possible that governmental bodies and regulators may disagree with our conclusions. To the extent we have not complied with such laws, rules, and regulations, we could be subject to significant fines, revocation of licenses, limitations on our products and services, reputational harm, and other regulatory consequences, each of which may be significant and could adversely affect our business, operating results, and financial condition.
Additionally, the recent bankruptcy filings of FTX, the third largest digital asset exchange by volume at the time of its filing, and its affiliated hedge fund Alameda Research LLC, in addition to other bankruptcy filings of crypto companies throughout calendar year 2022 and the first quarter of 2023, together with the recent closures of Silicon Valley Bank, SBNY and Silvergate Bank, will likely attract heightened regulatory scrutiny from U.S. regulatory agencies such as the SEC and CFTC. Increasing regulation and regulatory scrutiny may result in new costs for the Company and Company’s management having to devote increased time and attention to regulatory matters, change aspects of the Company’s business or result in limits on the utility of bitcoin. In addition, regulatory developments and/or the Company’s business activities may require the Company to comply with certain regulatory regimes. Increasingly strict legal and regulatory requirements and any regulatory investigations and enforcement may result in changes to our business, as well as increased costs, and supervision and examination for ourselves and our service providers. Moreover, new laws, regulations, or interpretations may result in additional litigation, regulatory investigations, and enforcement or other actions. Adverse hanges to, or our failure to comply with, any laws and regulations may have an adverse effect on our reputation and brand and our business, operating results, and financial condition.
Additionally, although we are not directly connected to the recent cryptocurrency market events, we may still suffer reputational harm due to our association with the cryptocurrency industry in light of the recent disruption in the crypto asset markets. Ongoing and future regulation and regulatory actions could significantly restrict or eliminate the market for or uses of bitcoin and/or may adversely affect the Company’s business, reputation, financial condition and results of operations.
TeraWulf may be at a higher risk of litigation and other legal proceedings due to heightened regulatory scrutiny of the cryptocurrency industry, which could ultimately be resolved against TeraWulf, requiring material future cash payments or charges, which could impair TeraWulf’s financial condition and results of operations.
The size, nature and complexity of the Company’s business could make it susceptible to various claims, both in litigation and binding arbitration proceedings, legal proceedings, and government investigations, due to the heightened regulatory scrutiny following the recent disruptions in the crypto asset markets. The Company believes that since cryptocurrency mining, and the digital asset industry generally, is a relatively new business sector, it is more likely subject to government investigation and regulatory determination, particularly following the recent cryptocurrency market participant bankruptcies described elsewhere herein. Any claims, regulatory proceedings or litigation that could arise in the course of the Company’s business could have a material adverse effect on the Company, its business or operations, or the industry as a whole.
The Company may be classified as an inadvertent investment company.
The Company is not engaged in the business of investing, reinvesting or trading in securities and does not hold itself out as being engaged in those activities. Under the Investment Company Act, however, a company may be deemed an investment company under Section 3(a)(1)(C) if the value of its investment securities is more than 40% of its total assets (exclusive of government securities and cash items) on a consolidated basis.
The Company will be engaging in digital asset mining, the outputs of which are cryptocurrencies, which may be deemed a security. In the event that the digital assets held by the Company exceed 40% of its total assets, exclusive of cash, the Company may inadvertently become an investment company. An inadvertent investment company can avoid being classified as an investment company if it can rely on one of the exclusions under the Investment Company Act. One such exclusion, namely Rule 3a-2 under the Investment Company Act, allows an inadvertent investment company a grace period of one year from the earlier of (i) the date on which an issuer owns securities and/or cash having a value exceeding 50% of the issuer’s total assets on either a consolidated or unconsolidated basis and (ii) the date on which an issuer owns or proposes to acquire investment securities having a value exceeding 40% of the value of such issuer’s total assets (exclusive of government securities and cash items) on an unconsolidated basis. The Company is putting in place policies that it expects will work to keep the digital assets held by the Company at less than 40% of its total assets, liquidating its digital assets or seeking a no-action letter from the SEC if the Company is unable to maintain sufficient total assets or liquidate sufficient digital assets in a timely manner.
As Rule 3a-2 is available to a company no more than once every three years, and assuming no other exclusions are available to the Company, the Company would have to keep within the 40% limit for at least three years after it ceases being an inadvertent investment company. This may limit the Company’s ability to make certain investments or enter into joint ventures that could otherwise have a positive impact on the Company’s earnings. In any event, the Company does not intend to become an investment company engaged in the business of investing and trading securities.
Classification as an investment company under the Investment Company Act requires registration with the SEC. If an investment company fails to register, it would have to stop doing almost all business, and its contracts would become voidable. Registration is time consuming and restrictive and would require a restructuring of the Company’s operations, and the Company would be very constrained in the kind of business it could do as a registered investment company. Furthermore, the Company would become subject to substantial regulation concerning management, operations, transactions with affiliated persons and portfolio composition, and would need to file reports under the Investment Company Act regime. The cost of such compliance would result in the Company incurring substantial additional expenses, and the failure to register if required may adversely affect the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations.
It may be illegal now, or in the future, to acquire, own, hold, sell or use digital assets in one or more countries, and ownership of, holding or trading in the Company’s securities may also be considered illegal and subject to sanction.
Although digital assets are not currently regulated or are lightly regulated in most countries, including the United States, one or more countries, such as China and Russia, may take regulatory actions in the future that severely restricts the right to acquire, own, hold, sell or use digital assets or to exchange digital assets for fiat currency. Such an action may also result in the restriction of ownership, holding or trading in the Company’s securities and may adversely affect the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations.
If regulatory changes or interpretations of the Company’s activities require its registration as a money services business under the regulations promulgated by FinCEN under the authority of the U.S. Bank Secrecy Act of 1970, as amended, the Company may be required to register and comply with such regulations.
To the extent that the activities of the Company cause it to be deemed a money service business under the regulations promulgated by FinCEN under the authority of the U.S. Bank Secrecy Act of 1970, as amended, the Company may be required to comply with FinCEN regulations, including those that would mandate the Company to implement anti-money laundering programs, make certain reports to FinCEN and maintain certain records.
To the extent that the activities of the Company cause it to be deemed a “money transmitter” or equivalent designation under state law of any state in which the Company operates, the Company may be required to seek a license or otherwise register with a state regulator and comply with state regulations that may include the implementation of anti-money laundering programs, maintenance of certain records and other operational requirements. Currently, the New York State Department of Financial Services has finalized its “BitLicense” framework for businesses that conduct “virtual currency business activity,” the Conference of State Bank Supervisors has proposed a model form of state level “virtual currency” regulation and additional state regulators, including those from the States of California, Idaho, Virginia, Kansas, Texas, South Dakota and Washington, have made public statements indicating that virtual currency businesses may be required to seek licenses as money transmitters. In July 2016, the State of North Carolina updated the law to define “virtual currency” and the activities that trigger licensure in a business-friendly approach that encourages companies to use virtual currency and blockchain technology. Specifically, the North Carolina law does not require miners or software providers to obtain a license for multi-signature software, smart contract platforms, smart property, colored coins and non-hosted, non-custodial wallets. Starting on January 1, 2016, the State of New Hampshire requires anyone who exchanges a digital currency for another currency must become a licensed and bonded money transmitter. In numerous other states, including the States of Connecticut and New Jersey, legislation is being proposed or has been introduced regarding the treatment of bitcoin and other digital assets. The Company will continue to monitor for developments in such legislation, guidance or regulations.
Such additional federal or state regulatory obligations may cause the Company to incur extraordinary expenses, possibly affecting an investment in the shares of the Company’s common stock in a material and adverse manner. Furthermore, the Company and its service providers may not be capable of complying with certain federal or state regulatory obligations applicable to money services business and money transmitters. If the Company is deemed to be subject to and is determined not to comply with such additional regulatory and registration requirements, the Company may act to dissolve and liquidate the Company.
Blockchain technology may expose the Company to specially designated nationals or blocked persons or cause it to violate provisions of law.
The Company is subject to the rules enforced by The Office of Financial Assets Control of the U.S. Department of Treasury (“OFAC”), including regarding sanctions and requirements not to conduct business with persons named on its specially designated nationals list. However, because of the pseudonymous nature of blockchain transactions, the Company may inadvertently and without its knowledge engage in transactions with persons named on OFAC’s specially designated nationals list, which may expose the Company to regulatory sanctions and adversely affect the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations.
The Company may be required to register and comply with bitcoin regulations and, to the extent that the Company decides to continue operations, the required registrations and regulatory compliance steps may result in extraordinary expenses to the Company.
Current and future legislation, and other regulatory developments, including interpretations released by a regulatory authority, may impact the manner in which bitcoins are treated for classification and clearing purposes. In particular, bitcoin derivatives are not excluded from the definition of “commodity future” by the CFTC. The Company cannot be certain as to how future regulatory developments will impact the treatment of bitcoins under the law.
Bitcoins have been deemed to fall within the definition of a commodity, and the Company may be required to register and comply with additional regulation under the Commodity Exchange Act of 1936, as amended, including additional periodic report and disclosure standards and requirements. Moreover, the Company may be required to register as a commodity pool operator and to register us as a commodity pool with the CFTC through the National Futures Association. Such additional registrations may result in extraordinary expenses, thereby materially and adversely affecting the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations. If the Company determines it will not comply with such additional regulatory and registration requirements, it may seek to cease certain of its operations. Any such action may adversely affect the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations. As of the date of this Annual Report, the Company is not aware of any rules that have been proposed to regulate bitcoins as securities. However, the Company cannot be certain as to how future regulatory developments will impact the treatment of bitcoins under the law.
If federal or state legislatures or agencies initiate or release tax determinations that change the classification of bitcoins as property for tax purposes (in the context of when such bitcoins are held as an investment), such determination could have a negative tax consequence on the Company or its shareholders.
Current guidance from the Internal Revenue Service indicates that digital assets such as bitcoin should be treated and taxed as property and that transactions involving the payment of bitcoin for goods and services should be treated as barter transactions. While this treatment creates a potential tax reporting requirement for any circumstance where the ownership of a bitcoin passes from one person to another, usually by means of bitcoin transactions (including off-blockchain transactions), it would also apply capital gains treatment to those transactions which may adversely affect the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations.
Under certain recently proposed legislation, substantial tax compliance burdens may be imposed on the Company relating to the tax reporting of bitcoin and bitcoin-related transactions.
Legislation recently passed in the Senate would impose substantial tax compliance obligations on the Company relating to the reporting of bitcoin and bitcoin-related transactions. Under this legislation, it is possible that the Company would be treated as a digital assets broker and required to deliver certain tax forms in connection with the validation of blockchain transactions. Were this legislation to be passed in the House and enacted unchanged, the Company could face tax reporting and compliance mandates that it may not have the information or resources to fully comply with. Although the current legislation may not be enacted in its current form, future legislation may impose similar tax compliance responsibilities on the Company, which may be expensive and burdensome to comply with, and which could, as a result, adversely impact the Company’s operations. The Company will continue to monitor for developments in such legislation, guidance or regulations.
The Company’s bitcoin holdings could subject it to regulatory scrutiny.
As digital assets, including bitcoin, have grown in popularity and market size, there has been increasing focus on the extent to which digital assets can be used to launder the proceeds of illegal activities or fund criminal or terrorist activities or entities subject to sanctions regimes. While the Company intends to institute risk-based procedures reasonably designed to promote compliance with applicable anti-money laundering and sanctions laws and regulations and takes care to only acquire bitcoin through entities subject to anti money laundering regulation and related compliance rules in the United States, if it is found to have purchased any bitcoin from bad actors that have used bitcoin to launder money or persons subject to sanctions, the Company is and may continue to be subject to regulatory proceedings and further transactions or dealings in bitcoin may be restricted or prohibited.
Due to the unregulated nature and lack of transparency surrounding the operations of many bitcoin trading venues, they may experience fraud, security failures or operational problems, which may adversely affect the value of the Company’s future bitcoin holdings.
Bitcoin trading venues are relatively new and, in some cases, unregulated. Furthermore, there are many bitcoin trading venues which do not provide the public with significant information regarding their ownership structure, management teams, corporate practices and regulatory compliance. As a result, the marketplace may lose confidence in bitcoin trading venues, including prominent exchanges that handle a significant volume of bitcoin trading.
Negative perception, a lack of stability in the broader bitcoin markets and the closure or temporary shutdown of bitcoin trading venues due to fraud, business failure, hackers or malware or government- mandated regulation may reduce confidence in bitcoin and result in greater volatility in the prices of bitcoin.
To the extent investors view the Company’s common stock as linked to the value of the Company’s future bitcoin holdings, these potential consequences of a bitcoin trading venue’s failure could have a material adverse effect on the market value of the Company’s common stock.
Risks Related to Ownership of Our Common Stock
Our stock price has been and may continue to be volatile, and you could lose all or part of your investment.
The market price of our common stock is subject to wide fluctuations in response to various risk factors, some of which are beyond our control and may not be related to our operating performance, including:
● addition or loss of significant customers, suppliers, or distributors;
● changes in laws or regulations applicable to our industry ;
● additions or departures of key personnel;
● the failure of securities analysts to cover our common stock after an offering;
● actual or anticipated changes in expectations regarding our performance by investors or securities analysts;
● price and volume fluctuations in the overall stock market;
● volatility in the market price and trading volume of companies in our industry or companies that investors consider comparable;
● share price and volume fluctuations attributable to inconsistent trading volume levels of our shares;
● our ability to protect our intellectual property and other proprietary rights;
● sales of our common stock by us or our stockholders;
● the expiration of contractual lock-up agreements;
● litigation involving us, our industry, or both;
● major catastrophic events; and
● general economic and market conditions and trends.
Further, the stock markets have experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations that have affected and continue to affect the market prices of equity securities of many companies. These fluctuations often have been unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of those companies. In addition, the stock prices of many cannabis-related companies have experienced wide fluctuations that have often been unrelated to the operating performance of those companies. These broad market and industry fluctuations, as well as general economic, political, and market conditions such as recessions, interest rate changes, or international currency fluctuations, may cause the market price of our common stock to decline. If the market price of our common stock fluctuates or declines, you may not realize any return on your investment and may lose some or all of your investment.
Our operating results are subject to fluctuations and our stock price may decline significantly.
Our quarterly revenue and operating results are difficult to predict from quarter to quarter. We derive revenue from our hemp processing business which is dependent upon volumes produced by farmers and is seasonal. Prices for products derived from hemp have declined significantly over the past few years resulting in many farmers exiting the industry. We derive relatively stable revenue from our property leased industrial warehouse. Nonetheless, it is possible that our net operating results in some quarters will fall below our expectations. Our quarterly operating results will be affected by a number of factors, including:
● Timing, availability and changes in government incentive programs;
● Unplanned additional expenses and/or shortfalls in anticipated rental income at our warehouse property;
● Logistical costs;
● The timing of new technology announcements or introductions by our competitors and other developments in the competitive environment;
● Increases or decreases in real estate appreciation rates due to changes in economic growth;
● Travel costs and other factors; and
● State and federal government regulations
If revenue for a particular quarter is lower than we expect, we may not be unable to proportionately reduce our operating expenses for that quarter, which would harm our operating results for that quarter. If we fail to meet investor expectations or our own future guidance, even by a small amount, our stock price could decline, perhaps substantially.
There are restrictions on the transferability of certain of our securities.
Until registered for resale, investors must bear the economic risk of an investment in the Shares for an indefinite period of time. Rule 144 promulgated under the Securities Act (“Rule 144”), which provides for an exemption from the registration requirements under the Securities Act under certain conditions, requires, among other conditions, a six-month holding period prior to the resale (in limited amounts) of securities acquired in a non-public offering without having to satisfy the registration requirements under the Securities Act. There can be no assurance that we will fulfill any reporting requirements in the future under the Exchange Act or disseminate to the public any current financial or other information concerning us.
If the Company uses its stock in acquisitions of other entities, there may be substantial dilution at the time of a transaction.
The offering price of the common stock we sold as a private placement of restricted shares of our common stock to raise working capital, was arbitrarily set. The price did not bear any relationship to our assets, book value, earnings or net worth and it is not an indication of actual value. You may also suffer additional dilution in the future from the sale of additional shares of common stock or other securities or if the Company’s shares are issued to purchase other assets or to raise additional working capital.
Trading on the OTC Markets can be volatile and sporadic, which could depress the market price of our common stock and make it difficult for our stockholders to resell their shares.
Our common shares are quoted on OTCQB. There is no cost of such quotation and related services from OTC Markets, Inc. Trading in stock quoted on the OTCQB Markets is often thin and characterized by wide fluctuations in trading prices due to many factors that may have little to do with our operations or business prospects. This volatility could depress the market price of our common stock for reasons unrelated to operating performance. Moreover, the OTC Markets is not a stock exchange, and trading of securities on the OTCQB Markets is often more sporadic than the trading of securities listed on a quotation system like Nasdaq or a stock exchange like the New York Stock Exchange. Accordingly, our stockholders may have difficulty reselling any of their shares. A number of brokerage houses will not trade our securities for customers because we are in the hemp business and/or because we trade on the OTC.
The Company currently plans to move to a more advantageous trading market via a potential uplisting, to a national exchange, and a formal application has been made. However, there is no assurance that we will be able to successfully move trading markets or uplist to a national exchange.
Because we do not expect to pay any dividends for the foreseeable future, investors may be forced to sell their stock to realize a return on their investment.
We do not anticipate that we will pay any dividends to holders of our common stock for the foreseeable future. Any payment of cash dividends will be at the discretion of our board of directors and will depend on, among other things, our results of operations, cash requirements, financial condition, contractual restrictions including compliance with covenants under our debt agreements, and other factors that our board of directors may deem relevant. Our ability to pay dividends might be restricted by the terms of any indebtedness that we incur in the future. In addition, certain of our current outstanding debt agreements prohibit us from paying cash dividends on our common stock. Consequently, you should not rely on dividends to receive a return on your investment.
Our common stock is presently subject to the “Penny Stock” rules of the SEC.
We are subject now to the “Penny Stock” rules since our shares of common stock sell below $5.00 per share. Penny stocks generally are equity securities with a price of less than $5.00. The penny stock rules require broker-dealers to deliver a standardized risk disclosure document prepared by the SEC which provides information about penny stocks and the nature and level of risks in the penny stock market. The broker-dealer must also provide the customer with current bid and offer quotations for the penny stock, the compensation of the broker-dealer and its salesperson, and monthly account statements showing the market value of each penny stock held in the customer’s account. The bid and offer quotations, and the broker-dealer and salesperson compensation information must be given to the customer orally or in writing prior to completing the transaction and must be given to the customer in writing before or with the customer’s confirmation. ∙ In addition, the penny stock rules require that prior to a transaction, the broker dealer must make a special written determination that the penny stock is a suitable investment for the purchaser and receive the purchaser’s written agreement to the transaction. The penny stock rules are burdensome and may reduce the trading activity for shares of our common stock. As long as our shares of common stock are subject to the penny stock rules, the holders of such shares of common stock may find it more difficult to sell their securities.
If we fail to remain current on our reporting requirements, we could be removed from the OTCQB which would limit the ability of broker-dealers to sell our securities in the secondary market.
Companies trading on the OTCQB must be reporting issuers under Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and must be current in their reports under Section 13, in order to maintain price quotation privileges on the OTCQB. As a result, the market liquidity for our securities could be severely adversely affected by limiting the ability of broker-dealers to sell our securities and the ability of stockholders to sell their securities in the secondary market. In addition, we may be unable to get relisted on the OTCQB, which may have an adverse material effect on the Company.
If we decide to implement a reverse stock split, a reverse stock split may decrease the liquidity of the shares of our common stock.
The liquidity of the shares of our common stock may be affected adversely by a reverse stock split given the reduced number of shares that will be outstanding following a reverse stock split, especially if the market price of our common stock does not increase as a result of the reverse stock split.

---

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
None.

---

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
Item 2. Properties
We provide post-harvest and midstream services to growers by drying, processing, cleaning, stripping harvested hemp directly from the field and wetbaled at our leased 48,000 square foot facility located in Hopkinsville, Kentucky. We maintain significant equipment at this location including four belt dryers, augers and elevators, polishers, debearders, screening machines, dust collection systems, hammer mill, air compressors and bagging equipment.
Our industrial warehouse is located at 4430 Garfield Street, Denver, Colorado in an industrial neighborhood zoned for cannabis cultivation. Properties located in the 80216 zip code have recently had some of the highest appreciation rates in the Denver region due to significant infrastructure expenditures by local governmental agencies. Numerous warehouses utilized for cannabis cultivation are located in this industrial district of Denver.
We also lease office space located in Fort Worth, Texas for managerial offices.
The Company owns certain real property including land, hydroelectric dam, generators, transformers, internet towers, etc. in Costa Rica through an 80% owned subsidiary.

---

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
As a normal incident of the businesses in which the Company is engaged, various claims, charges and litigation may be asserted or commenced from time to time against the Company. With respect to claims and litigation currently asserted or commenced against the Company, it is the opinion of management that final judgments, if any, which might be rendered against the Company are adequately reserved for, are covered by insurance, or are not likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition or results of operations. Nevertheless, given the uncertainties of litigation, it is possible that certain types of claims, charges and litigation could have a material adverse impact on the Company; see Item 1A, “Risk Factors.” See Note 8 to the consolidated financial statements included in this annual report for additional information relating to legal matters.

---

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURE
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures
Not applicable.
PART II

---

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY
Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity and Related Shareholder Matters.
Our common stock is quoted on OTCQB under the symbol “GENH.” In the future, should we meet stringent qualifications and pay the required fee, we plan to have our shares quoted on Capital Markets tier of NASDAQ, however here is no assurance that our shares will continue to be quoted on any market.
Shareholders
As of the date of this report, there were 76 direct holders of our common shares as shown on the list maintained by our transfer agent. We may have a substantial number of additional shareholders who hold their shares in street name.
Dividends
We have not declared or paid any cash dividends on our common stock. To date we have utilized all available cash to finance our operations. Payment of cash dividends in the future will be at the discretion of our Board of Directors and will depend upon our earnings levels, capital requirements, any restrictive loan covenants and other factors the Board considers relevant.
Warrants
At December 31, 2022, there were 3,058,333 warrants outstanding for the purchase of Company common stock. Refer to Note 10 to the consolidated financial statements included in this annual report for additional information relating to outstanding warrants.
Equity Compensation Plans
The 2021 Omnibus Incentive Plan (“2021 Plan”) was adopted by our Board on July 1, 2021. The 2021 Plan provides for the initial reservation of 15 million shares of common stock for issuance, and provides that the maximum number of shares that may be issued pursuant to the exercise of ISOs is 15 million. The number of shares of common stock available for issuance under the 2021 Plan constituted approximately 13.1% of the Company’s fully diluted common shares outstanding as of the date of Board approval, including shares issuable upon the conversion of preferred shares, as calculated on an as-converted basis. On the one-year anniversary date of the 2021 Plan, the number of shares of common stock reserved for issuance thereunder shall automatically increase to 20% of the fully diluted common shares outstanding, including shares issuable upon the conversion of preferred shares, as calculated on an as-converted basis.
At December 31, 2022, there were 15,765,000 options outstanding for the purchase of Company common stock. Refer to Note 11 to the consolidated financial statements included in this annual report for additional information relating to outstanding options.
Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities
Since January 1, 2022, we have sold securities in private transactions without registering the securities under the Securities Act as shown below:
● Issuance for Extensions of Secured Note - The Company issued 110,000 common shares as consideration for extensions of the maturity of a senior note in 2022.
Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers
We made no purchases of our equity securities.
Our Transfer Agent
We have retained Securities Transfer Corporation (“STC”), Plano, Texas, as transfer agent for our Common shares. Shareholders are responsible to contact STC to update their address. This may be done by contacting:
Securities Transfer Corporation
2901 N. Dallas Parkway, Suite 380
Plano, Texas 75093
Phone: (469) 633-0101
Fax: (469) 633-0088
www.stctransfer.com
STC is responsible for all record-keeping and administrative functions in connection with our common shares.

---

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
Item 6. Reserved
Not applicable.

---

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following discussion is intended to assist you in understanding our results of operations and our present financial condition and contains forward-looking statements that reflect our future plans, estimates, beliefs and expected performance. The forward-looking statements are dependent upon events, risks and uncertainties that may be outside our control. We caution you that our actual results could differ materially from those discussed in these forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences are discussed elsewhere in this Annual Report, particularly in the “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” and “Risk Factors,” all of which are difficult to predict. In light of these risks, uncertainties and assumptions, the forward-looking events discussed may not occur. We do not undertake any obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statements except as otherwise required by applicable law.
There is limited historical financial information about our Company upon which to base an evaluation of our future performance. We cannot guarantee that we will be successful in our hemp businesses. We are subject to risks inherent in a small company, including limited capital resources, delays and cost overruns due to price and cost increases. There is no assurance that future financing will be available to our company on acceptable terms. Additional equity financing could result in dilution to existing shareholders.
Overview
We are a holding company active within the “hemp” space. Beginning in 2023, we started activities in the sustainable asset space including the bitcoin industry. We were incorporated on August 21, 2021 in the State of Delaware. The Company was originally incorporated on July 28, 2008 in the State of Colorado. On November 27, 2019, HTF purchased approximately 94% of the common stock of EHR in a series of transactions accounted for as a reverse merger.
On January 11, 2021, we completed the acquisition of certain assets of Halcyon Thruput, LLC (“Halcyon”). With this acquisition, we commenced providing post-harvest and midstream services to growers by drying, processing, cleaning and stripping harvested hemp directly from the field and wetbaled at our 48,000 square foot leased facility located in Hopkinsville, Kentucky. Additionally, the Company offers safe storage services for processed hemp, which enables farmers to maximize strategic market timing. In September 2021, the Company launched its small animal bedding consumer goods product line (“Rowdy Rooster”) made from the hemp hurd byproduct that is produced from its hemp processing operations. In September of 2022, the Company launched its industrial absorbent consumer goods product line (Gas Monkey Spill-Jack), also made from the hemp hurd byproduct produced from its hemp processing operations. This second product line is marketed under a branding agreement with Gas Monkey Garage, a well-known brand in the automotive and entertainment sector.
We also generate revenue from rental of our “Cannabis Zoned” (Hemp) warehouse property located in Denver, Colorado currently leased to an unaffiliated hemp seed company.
Liquidity - The Company is dependent upon obtaining additional funding to continue ongoing operations and to pursue its strategy and execute its acquisition plans.
In the year ended December 31, 2022, the Company used $633 thousand of cash for its operating activities. At December 31, 2022, the Company’s current liabilities, including financing obligations due within one year, totaled $5.9 million as compared with its current assets of $917 thousand.
The Company will continue to pursue additional capital raising opportunities in order to fund future acquisitions and meet its obligations as they become due. In the event financing cannot be obtained, the Company may not be able to satisfy these plans and obligations. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.
Subsequent Events
In January 2023, the Company announced a new strategic direction into sustainable energy projects, starting with bitcoin mining. The Company’s name was changed to Evergreen Sustainable Enterprises, Inc. (“EGSE”) in March 2023. The Company’s existing hemp operations will continue to be maintained as a fully operating wholly-owned subsidiary.
On January 9, 2023, the Company purchased 80% of Toro Energía Sociedad Anonima (“Toro”), a Costa Rican corporation with ownership of a hydroelectric dam located in Costa Rica. The source of approximately one megawatt of power produced from the hydroelectric dam (six generators) will be used to power new Bitcoin mining machines at an extremely low cost. The transaction was completed based on a total enterprise value for Toro of $2.75 million, including seller-financed debt of $985 thousand. The seller-financed debt has a term of 10 years and a 9.5% per annum variable interest rate (based on the prime rate) with straight line amortization.
The purchase price for 80% of Toro’s equity was $1,412,000. These amounts were paid in cash from proceeds of a Secured Promissory Note (“Secured Note”) with Gary C. Evans, CEO of the Company (‘Evans”). Under the terms of the Secured Note, (a) the Company and Evans restructured (i) the Subordinated Promissory Note, dated November 20, 2020 and (ii) Convertible Promissory Note, dated July 20, 2021, such that all accrued and unpaid interest on each note were rolled into a new Secured Note, (b) Evans lent the Company $500 thousand on January 9, 2023 and $969 thousand on January 10, 2023. The Secured Note has a maturity date of July 15, 2023 and bears interest at the rate of 10.00% per annum. The Secured Note has a conversion feature which permits Evans to convert at the Maturity Date then outstanding principal and interest at a conversion price of $0.275 (the closing price of the Company’s stock on January 9, 2023).
The Toro Dam is located approximately 25 miles from San Jose between two volcano craters. The site generates all its energy from green resources with a proven 98% run time over the many years it has been in operation and has a full-time staff in place under a new Operating & Maintenance Agreement.
Hydroelectric power is a clean and renewable energy source that is used to generate electricity by harnessing the energy of falling water and can provide a reliable and a very cost-effective source of energy for bitcoin mining operations. Hydroelectric power can help reduce the carbon footprint of cryptocurrency mining, as many cryptocurrencies are produced using fossil fuels, which continues to contribute to greenhouse gas emissions and climate change. By using hydroelectric power, bitcoin mining can be made more environmentally friendly and sustainable and can help improve the stability and reliability of cryptocurrency networks. Hydroelectric power is a relatively stable and reliable source of energy, compared to other sources such as coal or fossil fuels, which can be prone to price fluctuations and supply disruptions. The Company has committed to acquire and made financial payments for the purchase of 240 new Bitmain S19J Pro+ ASIC miners that will be deployed at the Toro Dam sometime in the first quarter of 2023.
How the Company Generates Revenue
We provide post-harvest and midstream services to growers by drying, processing, cleaning and stripping harvested hemp directly from the field and wetbaled at our leased 48,000 square foot facility located in Hopkinsville, Kentucky. Additionally, the Company offers safe storage services for processed hemp, which enables farmers to maximize strategic market timing. In August 2021, the Company launched its animal bedding consumer goods product line made from the hemp hurd byproduct that is produced from its hemp processing operations.
We also generate revenue from rental of our “Cannabis Zoned” (Hemp) warehouse property located in Denver, Colorado currently leased to a hemp seed company.
We currently intend to generate revenue from Bitcoin mining.
Our Costs and Expenses of Conducting Business
The principal costs and expenses involved in conducting our business are labor, materials and overhead costs for processing services, real estate holding costs (interest, taxes, depreciation and maintenance costs) and general and administrative expenses for our management, contract labor, professional fees and other costs of being a public company. We also incur costs in seeking acquisitions and financings of our business.
Discontinued Oil & Gas Activities
As of December 31, 2022, EHR held an approximate 8% working interest in an oil & gas property located in Cochran County, Texas within the Slaughter-Levelland Field of the San Andres formation in the Northwest Shelf of West Texas. EHR’s oil & gas activities are currently held for sale and are presented in these consolidated financial statements as discontinued operations for each of the periods presented.
Results of Operations
Years Ended December 31, 2022 and 2021
The net loss attributable to Evergreen Sustainable Enterprises for the year ended December 31, 2022 was $7.0 million as compared with a net loss attributable to Evergreen Sustainable Enterprises of $9.8 million for 2021. The net loss attributable to Evergreen Sustainable Enterprises for 2022 includes $4.8 million of stock-based compensation expense, $407 thousand for a non-cash impairment charge and $1.0 million for depreciation and amortization largely due to the Halcyon acquisition. Excluding these non-cash items, the Company’s cash loss was $852 thousand in 2022 as compared with a cash loss of $3.9 million for 2021. We processed larger volumes of hemp in 2022 as compared with 2021 resulting in greater gross profits from these operations. We also received $501 thousand for settlements from two lawsuits during 2022.
The Company reports its oil & gas activities as discontinued operations. Loss from discontinued operations was $60 thousand for the year ended December 31, 2022 as compared with a loss of $32 thousand in 2021.
Revenue. Total revenue for 2022 was $2.6 million as compared with $674 thousand for 2021.
Our hemp processing operations are typically limited during the first half of each year until harvest. In 2022, we commenced hemp processing in June and remained fully operational through late-December 2022. We processed 6.1 million pounds of hemp biomass for total revenues of $2.5 million. In 2021, we commenced hemp processing operations in the third quarter. We had revenues of $592 thousand for the processing of approximately 2.1 million pounds of hemp biomass.
In 2022, we sold about 30% of our on-hand inventory of processed hemp biomass for $100 thousand. We took this inventory in-kind from a customer in late-2021. We are holding the remaining inventory for sale at a later date.
Rental revenue was $90 thousand in 2022 as compared with $82 thousand in 2021. The Company’s Denver warehouse is presently leased through August 1, 2023 for $7.5 thousand per month plus certain other expenses.
Cost of Revenue. Cost of revenue was $1.0 million for 2022 as compared with $653 thousand for 2021 and consisted of direct labor, supplies and overhead for the Company’s post-harvest and midstream services operations. Our gross margin on post-harvest processing and midstream services was 59% in 2022 as compared with -10% for 2021. The negative margin on this business in 2021 was caused by holding costs and limited staffing needed until the annual harvest and processing commenced in August 2021. In 2022, we took steps to reduce operating costs by idling our facilities until processing commenced in June 2022.
Depreciation and Amortization. Depreciation and amortization expense totaled $1.0 million in 2022 as compared with $1.3 million for 2021. Intangible assets consist of customer relationships and non-compete agreements acquired in the acquisition of certain assets of Halcyon. Amortization of these intangibles was $586 thousand in 2022 and $818 thousand in 2021. Future amortization expense in each of the next five years are expected to be $419 thousand for 2023, $278 thousand for 2024, $194 thousand for 2025, $130 thousand for 2026 and $86 thousand for 2027.
General and Administrative Expense. General and administrative expenses totaled $7.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2022 as compared with $7.8 million in 2021. The reduction was principally a result of lower cash compensation expense in 2022. In 2021, bonus compensation totaling $610 thousand was paid to our CEO for successful completion of the Halcyon acquisition. Non-cash stock-based compensation expense was $4.8 million in 2022 as compared with $4.5 million in 2021.
Other Income/Expense. Interest expense was $501 thousand in 2022 and $708 thousand in 2021. Amortization of debt discounts was $327 thousand higher in 2021 than in 2022. These debt discounts were incurred from the initial issuance of debt with stock or warrants.
Other income for 2022 includes $501 thousand received for settlements from two lawsuits during 2022. In 2021, other income of $25 thousand was recognized for forgiveness of the Company’s PPP Loan principal and interest thereon.
Loss from Discontinued Operations. In 2022, we recognized a loss from discontinued operations of $60 thousand as compared with a loss of $32 thousand in 2021. The major classes of line items constituting the loss on discontinued operations is presented in Item 8 of Part II, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data-Note 12-Discontinued Operations.” Until we fully dispose of our remaining oil & gas property interests, we expect lower future revenues and costs as production activities have declined substantially. We do not anticipate making future investment of growth capital into these properties. In 2019, the Company’s oil and gas properties became impaired and the carrying amount of the properties was expensed due to the market decline and the Company’s determination to exit the oil and gas business.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our primary source of cash from continuing operations includes post-harvest and midstream services and rental revenue. Our primary uses of cash include our operating costs, general and administrative expenses and merger and acquisition expenses.
Cash flow information from continuing operations for 2022 was as follows:
● Cash used in operating activities was $633 thousand million principally due to the net loss adjusted for non-cash items.
● No cash was used for investing activities in 2022.
● Net cash from financing activities totaled $887 thousand. This amount included $1.3 million of cash inflows from the proceeds from notes payable. We used $407 thousand of cash for repayment of outstanding indebtedness.
We used $3 thousand of cash for discontinued operations in 2022.
Funding Requirements
We expect to continue to incur significant expenses and operating losses for the foreseeable future. We anticipate that our overall expenses may increase significantly as we grow our hemp business.
We anticipate that we will require additional capital to fund operations, including hiring additional employees, completing acquisitions and funding capital expenditures during the next twelve-month period.
Because of the numerous risks and uncertainties associated with the development and commercialization of our business, we are unable to estimate the amounts of increased capital outlays and operating expenses. Our future capital requirements will depend on many factors, including:
● our success in identifying and making acquisitions of profitable operations;
● our ability to negotiate operating contracts with growers and others within the hemp industry on favorable terms, if at all;
● deriving revenue from our assets and operations; and
● the cost of such operations and costs of being a public company.
Until such time as we can generate substantial revenues, we expect to finance our cash needs through a combination of equity offerings and debt financings. We do not have any committed external source of funds. To the extent that we raise additional capital through the sale of equity or convertible debt securities, the ownership interest of our shareholders will be diluted, and the terms of these securities may include liquidation or other preferences that adversely affect the rights of common shareholders. Debt financing, if available, may involve agreements that include covenants limiting or restricting our ability to take specific actions, such as incurring additional debt, making capital expenditures or declaring dividends. If we are unable to raise additional funds through equity or debt financings when needed, we may be required to delay, limit, reduce or terminate our growth plans and future commercialization efforts.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
As of December 31, 2022, we had no off-balance sheet arrangements.
Indebtedness
The Company’s indebtedness at December 31, 2022 is presented in Item I, “Financial Statements - Note 5 - Notes Payable - Related Parties” and in Item I, “Financial Statements-Note 6-Other Indebtedness.”
Subsequently, the Company received advances under new and existing note arrangements. Refer to Item I, “Financial Statements-Note 15 - Subsequent Events.”
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the amounts of revenue and expenses reported for the period then ended.
Impairment of Long-lived Assets. We review our long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. These events and circumstances include, but are not limited to, a current expectation that a long-lived asset will be disposed of significantly before the end of its previously estimated useful life, a significant adverse change in the extent or manner in which we use a long-lived asset or a change in its physical condition.
When such events or changes in circumstances occur, a recoverability test is performed comparing projected undiscounted cash flows from the use and eventual disposition of an asset or asset group to its carrying amount. If the projected undiscounted cash flows are less than the carrying amount, an impairment is recorded for the excess of the carrying amount over the estimated fair value.
We make various assumptions, including assumptions regarding future cash flows in our assessments of long-lived assets for impairment. The assumptions about future cash flows and growth rates are based on the current and long-term business plans related to the long-lived assets.
Stock-based Compensation - We account for employee stock-based compensation using the fair value method. Compensation cost for equity incentive awards is based on the fair value of the equity instrument generally on the date of grant and is recognized over the requisite service period. Forfeitures are recognized as they occur.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements. See Item 8 of Part II, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data-Note 2-Summary of Significant Accounting Policies-Recent Accounting Pronouncements.”

---

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk
Not required for smaller reporting companies.

---

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Page
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (PCAOB ID Number 688)
Consolidated Balance Sheets
Consolidated Statements of Operations
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Shareholders and Board of Directors of
Evergreen Sustainable Enterprises, Inc. (formerly Generation Hemp, Inc.)
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Evergreen Sustainable Enterprises, Inc. (formerly Generation Hemp, Inc.) (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in stockholders’ equity (deficit) and cash flows for each of the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “financial statements”). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Explanatory Paragraph - Going Concern
The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As more fully described in Note 1, the Company has a significant working capital deficiency, has incurred significant losses and needs to raise additional funds to meet its obligations and sustain its operations. These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans in regard to these matters are also described in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.
Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Critical Audit Matters
The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current period audit of the financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.
Valuation and accounting for share-based instruments
As described in Note 9, for the year ended December 31, 2021, the Company issued 2,558,333 warrants to investors with exercise prices of $0.500 to $0.600 per share, vesting over a period of two years. The warrants issued were attached to units of common stock sold to various investors including a related party, which are only redeemable by the warrants holders.
As described in Note 10, the Company issued 13,850,000 options during the year ended December 31, 2021 with a grant date fair value of $10,525,284. Additionally, the Company issued 1,915,000 options during the year ended December 31, 2022 with a grant date fair value of $576,251. Share-based compensation expense of $4,385,118 and $4,758,257 was recognized in 2021 and 2022, respectively, related to these options based on the vesting terms.
How we Addressed the Matter in Our Audit
Our audit procedures included, amongst others:
● We tested the agreements to determine whether management appropriately evaluated such agreements on issuance date.
● We tested the information that served as the basis for valuation of the shares issued to determine whether stock compensation should be recorded.
● We evaluated the reasonableness of the valuation method and assumptions used by management to calculate the values on issuance date by developing an independent estimate of the volatility by utilizing third party historical data of closing prices.
Valuation and accounting for acquisition of Halcyon assets
As described in Note 3, for the year ended December 31, 2021, the Company completed the acquisition of certain assets of Halcyon for a total purchase consideration of $6,100,000 consisting of 6,250,000 shares of Company common stock valued at $2.5 million, $1.75 million in cash, a promissory note for $850,000 and the assumption of approximately $1,000,000 of new indebtedness of Halcyon.
How we Addressed the Matter in Our Audit
Our audit procedures included, amongst others:
● We tested the asset purchase agreements to determine whether appropriately evaluated such agreements on the acquisition date.
● We tested the information that served as the basis for valuation for the asset acquired whether any valuation adjustments should be recorded.
● We evaluated the reasonableness of the valuation method and assumptions used by management to calculate the values on the acquisition date by developing an independent estimate of the fair values by utilizing the multi-period excess earnings method for intangible assets and published cost databases for tangible assets.
/s/ Marcum llp
Marcum llp
We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2019.
Houston, Texas
May 18, 2023
Evergreen Sustainable Enterprises, Inc.
(formerly Generation Hemp, Inc.)
Consolidated Balance Sheets
December 31,
Assets
Current Assets:
Cash $ 275,506 $ 20,656
Accounts receivable 470,719 -
Inventories 148,427 212,518
Prepaid expenses 22,143 4,723
Total current assets 916,795 237,897
Property and equipment, net 2,161,952 2,580,662
Operating lease right-of-use asset 161,827 263,065
Intangible assets, net 1,271,398 1,857,908
Goodwill 799,888 799,888
Other assets 2,060 407,000
Total Assets $ 5,313,920 $ 6,146,420
Liabilities and Equity (Deficit)
Current Liabilities:
Accounts payable $ 686,297 $ 883,485
Accrued liabilities 767,396 410,990
Payables to related parties 591,574 204,007
Operating lease liability - related party 111,839 101,238
Notes payable - related parties 3,322,620 2,183,551
Other indebtedness - current 250,002 501,668
Current liabilities of discontinued operations held for sale 166,186 153,482
Total current liabilities 5,895,914 4,438,421
Operating lease liability - related party, net of current portion 49,988 161,827
Long-term liabilities of discontinued operations held for sale 207,197 162,948
Total liabilities 6,153,099 4,763,196
Commitments and contingencies
Series B redeemable preferred stock, no par value, $10,000 stated value, 300 shares authorized, 118 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2022 and 2021 591,558 591,558
Equity (Deficit):
Preferred stock, $0.00001 par value; 200,000,000 shares authorized, none outstanding -
-
Common stock, $0.00001 par value; 200,000,000 shares authorized, 113,204,002 and 113,094,002 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively 1,132 1,131
Additional paid-in capital 34,029,851 29,150,258
Accumulated deficit (35,230,018 ) (28,118,245 )
Evergreen Sustainable Enterprises equity (deficit) (1,199,035 ) 1,033,144
Noncontrolling interest (231,702 ) (241,478 )
Total equity (deficit) (1,430,737 ) 791,666
Total Liabilities and Equity (Deficit) $ 5,313,920 $ 6,146,420
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
Evergreen Sustainable Enterprises, Inc.
(formerly Generation Hemp, Inc.)
Consolidated Statements of Operations
For the year ended
December 31,
Revenue:
Post-harvest and midstream services $ 2,505,590 $ 592,024
Rental 90,000 82,500
Total revenue 2,595,590 674,524
Costs and Expenses:
Cost of revenue (exclusive of items shown separately below) 1,016,930 652,521
Depreciation and amortization 1,005,220 1,340,425
Impairment expense 407,000 -
General and administrative 7,128,421 7,803,196
Total costs and expenses 9,557,571 9,796,142
Operating loss (6,961,981 ) (9,121,618 )
Other expense (income):
Other income (500,905 ) (25,424 )
Change in fair value of marketable security -
(11,770 )
Interest expense 501,146 708,338
Total other expense (income) 671,144
Loss from continuing operations (6,962,222 ) (9,792,762 )
Income (loss) from discontinued operations (59,773 ) (32,213 )
Net loss $ (7,021,995 ) $ (9,824,975 )
Less: net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests 9,776 (2,247 )
Net loss attributable to Evergreen Sustainable Enterprises $ (7,031,771 ) $ (9,822,728 )
Earnings (loss) per common share:
Loss from continuing operations
Basic $ (0.06 ) $ (0.17 )
Diluted $ (0.06 ) $ (0.17 )
Loss from discontinued operations
Basic $ -
$ -
Diluted $ -
$ -
Earnings (loss) per share
Basic $ (0.06 ) $ (0.17 )
Diluted $ (0.06 ) $ (0.17 )
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
Evergreen Sustainable Enterprises, Inc.
(formerly Generation Hemp, Inc.)
Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)
Series B
Redeemable
Preferred Stock Series A Preferred Stock Common Stock Additional
Paid-In Accumulated Noncontrolling Total Equity
Shares Amount Shares Amount Shares Amount Capital Deficit Interest (Deficit)
Balance at January 1, 2021 $ 729,058 6,328,948 $ 4,975,503 17,380,317 $ 6,083,480 $ 4,436,018 $ (18,220,705 ) $ (239,231 ) $ (2,964,935 )
Acquisition of Certain Assets of Halcyon Thruput, LLC - - - - 6,250,000 2,500,000 - - - 2,500,000
Issuances of common stock units - - - - 1,758,333 136,717 838,283 - - 975,000
Warrant exercises - - - - 9,494,316 4,771,679 (1,429,679 ) - - 3,342,000
Issuance of common shares for Convertible Promissory Note - - - - 618,660 217,769 - - - 217,769
Issuance of common shares for Senior Secured Promissory Note - - - - 1,000,000 1,942,500 - - - 1,942,500
Common shares issued to vendor for services - - - - 125,000 117,500 - - - 117,500
Issuance of common shares for extension of secured note - - - - 20,000 18,000 - - - 18,000
Change in common stock par value due to change in corporate domicile - - - - - (15,868,273 ) 15,868,273 - - -
Conversion of Series A preferred stock
(6,328,948 ) (4,975,503 ) 75,947,376 4,974,744 - - -
Series B preferred stock redemptions (17 ) (137,500 ) - - - - - - - -
Series B preferred stock dividend - - - - - - - (74,812 ) - (74,812 )
Stock-based compensation - - - - 500,000 81,000 4,462,619 - - 4,543,619
Net loss - - - - - - - (9,822,728 ) (2,247 ) (9,824,975 )
Balance at December 31, 2021 591,558 - - 113,094,002 1,131 29,150,258 (28,118,245 ) (241,478 ) 791,666
Issuance of common shares for extension of secured note - - - - 110,000 52,580 - - 52,581
Modification of warrants for extension of promissory note to investor
68,756
68,756
Series B preferred stock dividend - - - - - - - (80,002 ) - (80,002 )
Stock-based compensation - - - - - - 4,758,257 - - 4,758,257
Net loss - - - - - - - (7,031,771 ) 9,776 (7,021,995 )
Balance at December 31, 2022 $ 591,558 - $ - 113,204,002 $ 1,132 $ 34,029,851 $ (35,230,018 ) $ (231,702 ) $ (1,430,737 )
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
Evergreen Sustainable Enterprises, Inc.
(formerly Generation Hemp, Inc.)
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
For the year ended
December 31,
Cash Flows From Operating Activities
Net loss $ (7,021,995 ) $ (9,824,975 )
Loss from discontinued operations (59,773 ) (32,213 )
Net loss from continuing operations (6,962,222 ) (9,792,762 )
Adjustments to reconcile net loss from continuing operations to net cash from operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization 1,005,220 1,340,425
Impairment expense 407,000 -
Amortization of debt discount 52,581 380,282
Stock-based compensation 4,758,257 4,543,619
Common shares issued to vendor for services -
117,500
Modification of warrants for extension of promissory note to investor 68,756 -
Other income - PPP Loan forgiveness -
(25,424 )
Loss on disposal of property and equipment -
6,938
Change in fair value of marketable securities -
(11,770 )
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable (470,719 ) 75,470
Inventories 64,091 (212,518 )
Prepaid expenses and other assets (19,480 ) (4,723 )
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities 466,783 85,939
Net cash from operating activities - continuing operations (629,733 ) (3,497,024 )
Net cash from operating activities - discontinued operations (2,820 ) -
Net cash from operating activities (632,553 ) (3,497,024 )
Cash Flows From Investing Activities
Capital expenditures -
(77,715 )
Acquisition of certain assets of Halcyon Thruput, LLC, net of acquired cash of $224,530 -
(1,525,470 )
Proceeds from sale of investment in common stock -
34,847
Net cash from investing activities - continuing operations -
(1,568,338 )
Cash Flows From Financing Activities
Issuance of common stock units -
925,000
Redemptions of Series B preferred stock
(137,500 )
Series B preferred stock dividends paid
(16,500 )
Proceeds from warrant exercises -
3,342,000
Repayment of Halcyon bank note -
(995,614 )
Proceeds from notes payable - related parties 1,294,069 -
Repayments of notes payable - related parties (105,000 ) -
Proceeds from subordinated notes -
410,000
Repayment of subordinated notes (50,000 ) (1,100,000 )
Payment of mortgage payable (251,666 ) (117,793 )
Net cash from financing activities - continuing operations 887,403 2,309,593
Net change in cash 254,850 (2,755,769 )
Cash, beginning of period 20,656 2,776,425
Cash, end of period $ 275,506 $ 20,656
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
Evergreen Sustainable Enterprises, Inc.
(formerly Generation Hemp, Inc.)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
1. Business
Evergreen Sustainable Enterprises, Inc. (formerly Generation Hemp, Inc.) (the “Company”) was incorporated on August 21, 2021 in the State of Delaware. The Company was originally incorporated as Home Treasure Finders, Inc. (“HTF”) on July 28, 2008 in the State of Colorado. On November 27, 2019, HTF purchased approximately 94% of the common stock of Energy Hunter Resources, Inc. (“EHR”) in a series of transactions accounted for as a reverse merger. Upon closing, HTF changed its name to Generation Hemp, Inc. In March 2023, the Company changed its name to Evergreen Sustainable Enterprises, Inc.
On January 11, 2021, we completed the acquisition of certain assets of Halcyon Thruput, LLC (“Halcyon”). With this acquisition, we commenced providing post-harvest and midstream services to hemp growers by drying, processing, cleaning and stripping harvested hemp directly from the field and wetbaled at our 48,000 square foot leased facility located in Hopkinsville, Kentucky. The Company also offers safe storage services for processed hemp, which enables farmers to maximize strategic market timing. We market two retail products, Gas Monkey Spill-Jack, an all-natural, plant-based, sustainable, and biodegradable loose absorbent, and Rowdy Rooster, an animal bedding consumer goods product, each made from the hemp hurd byproduct that is produced from our hemp processing operations.
We also generate revenue from rental of our “Cannabis Zoned” (Hemp) warehouse property located in Denver, Colorado currently leased to an unaffiliated hemp seed company.
As of December 31, 2022, EHR held an approximate 8% working interest in an oil & gas property located in Cochran County, Texas within the Slaughter-Levelland Field of the San Andres formation in the Northwest Shelf of West Texas. EHR’s oil & gas activities are currently held for sale and are presented in these consolidated financial statements as discontinued operations for each of the periods presented.
Our management team has been and continues to actively review acquisition candidates involved in the hemp industry that operate within a number of vertical businesses, predominantly within the midstream sector that are attractive to us and are within the hemp supply chain. Additionally, the Company has been studying the Bitcoin mining space and in January 2023 announced a new strategic initiative in this area and commenced bitcoin operations. Refer to Note 15 for more discussion.
Liquidity and Going Concern - The Company is dependent upon obtaining additional funding to continue ongoing operations and to pursue its strategy and execute its acquisition plans.
In the year ended December 31, 2022, the Company used $633 thousand of cash for its operating activities. At December 31, 2022, the Company’s current liabilities, including financing obligations due within one year, totaled $5.9 million as compared with its current assets of $917 thousand.
The Company will continue to pursue additional capital raising opportunities in order to fund future acquisitions and meet its obligations as they become due. We may not be successful in obtaining additional financing needed. In the event financing cannot be obtained, the Company may not be able to satisfy these plans and obligations. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation - The financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) and U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission regulations. The consolidated financial statements comprise the financial statements of the Company, its wholly-owned subsidiaries, and subsidiaries that it controls due to ownership of a majority voting interest. Subsidiaries are fully consolidated from the date of acquisition, being the date on which the Company obtains control, and continue to be consolidated until the date when such control ceases. The financial statements of the subsidiaries are prepared for the same reporting period as the Company. All significant intercompany balances and transactions are eliminated upon consolidation.
Business Combinations - The Company accounts for business combinations under the acquisition method of accounting. Under this method, acquired assets, including separately identifiable intangible assets, and any assumed liabilities are recorded at their acquisition date estimated fair value. Determining the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed involves the use of significant estimates and assumptions. The excess of purchase price over the fair value amounts assigned to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed represents the goodwill amount resulting from the acquisition.
Use of Estimates - The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the period. Significant items subject to such estimates and assumptions include the (i) impairment of long-lived assets and goodwill, (ii) valuation allowances for deferred income tax assets and (iii) estimates of accrued liabilities. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Revenue Recognition - Post-harvest and midstream services revenue is typically determined based on volumes processed at agreed-upon contractual prices and is recognized at the point in time when performance obligations under the terms of a contract with our customers are satisfied. This occurs when control of the product is transferred to our customers upon completion of our processing.
Rental revenue is recognized based on the contractual cash rental payments for the period.
Cash - The Company maintains its deposits of cash in financial institutions, which may at times exceed amounts covered by insurance provided by the U.S. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”). The Company has not experienced any losses related to amounts in excess of FDIC limits.
Inventories - Inventories consist of processed hemp product and are stated at the lower of cost or net realizable value. Cost, which includes the cost of raw materials, labor and overhead, is determined using the first-in, first-out method. Net realizable value is the estimated selling price in the ordinary course of business, less reasonably predictable cost of completion, disposal and transportation.
Property and Equipment - Property and equipment is stated at cost and depreciated using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of assets. Upon disposition, the cost and accumulated depreciation are removed and any gain or loss on the disposal is reflected in the statements of operations. The cost of maintenance and repairs is charged to income as incurred; significant renewals and improvements are capitalized.
Leases - The Company’s lease arrangements are operating leases which are capitalized on the balance sheet as right-of-use (“ROU”) assets and obligations. Right of use (“ROU”) assets represent our right to use an underlying asset for the lease term and lease liabilities represent our obligation to make lease payments arising from the lease. These are recognized at the lease commencement date based on the present value of payments over the lease term. If leases do not provide for an implicit rate, we use our incremental borrowing rate based on the estimated rate of interest for collateralized borrowing over a similar term as the lease payments. Lease expense is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term.
Intangible Assets - Finite-lived intangible assets are amortized and are tested for impairment when an event occurs or circumstances change that indicate it is more likely than not that an impairment exists. Intangible assets consist of customer relationships and non-compete agreements acquired in the acquisition of certain assets of Halcyon.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets - We review long-lived assets for potential impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the asset may not be recoverable. In this assessment, future pre-tax cash flows (undiscounted) resulting from the use of the asset and its eventual disposal are estimated. If the undiscounted future cash flows are less than the carrying amount of the asset, an impairment loss is recognized for the difference between its carrying value and estimated fair value.
Noncontrolling Interest - Noncontrolling interests represent the portion of net assets in consolidated entities that are not owned by the Company. As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, minority investors owned approximately 6% of EHR.
Stock-based Compensation - We account for stock-based compensation using the fair value method. Compensation cost for equity incentive awards is based on the fair value of the equity instrument generally on the date of grant and is recognized over the requisite service period. Forfeitures are recognized as they occur.
Income Taxes - Income taxes are accounted for using a balance sheet approach. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases and operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets, management considers whether it is more-likely-than-not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the periods in which those temporary differences become deductible. Management considers the scheduled reversal of deferred tax asset (including the impact of available carryback and carryforward periods), projected future taxable income, and tax-planning strategies in making this assessment. A valuation allowance for deferred tax assets is recorded when it is more likely than not that the benefit from the deferred tax asset will not be realized.
The Company recognizes the effect of income tax positions only if those positions are more likely than not of being sustained. Recognized income tax positions are measured at the largest amount that is greater than 50% likely of being realized. Changes in recognition or measurement are reflected in the period in which a change in judgment occurs. The Company had no material uncertain tax positions as of December 31, 2022 or 2021. Income tax returns we file may be routinely examined by tax authorities. The statute of limitations is currently open for tax returns filed after 2018.
The Company is subject to the Texas margin tax; however, tax expense was zero for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021.
Discontinued Operations - In connection with the Transaction, management determined to fully divest of EHR’s oil and gas activities. As such, these activities are presented as discontinued operations for each of the periods presented.
The Company follows the successful efforts method of accounting for its oil and gas properties. Costs to acquire mineral interests in oil and gas properties and to drill and equip new development wells and related asset retirement costs are capitalized. In 2019, the Company’s oil and gas properties became fully impaired and the carrying amount of the properties was expensed to the market decline and the Company’s determination to exit the oil and gas business. The oil & gas properties have limited production and operations for which the Company recognizes its share as a non-operating working interest owner. Oil & gas revenue is recognized for discontinued operations based on delivered quantities in the amount of the consideration to which the Company is entitled.
The Company records a liability for the plugging, abandonment and remediation of its properties at the end of their productive lives. The Company computes the liability for asset retirement obligations by calculating the present value of estimated future cash flows related to each property. This requires the Company to use significant assumptions, including current estimates of plugging and abandonment costs, annual inflation of these costs, the productive lives of wells and its risk-adjusted interest rate. Changes in any of these assumptions can result in significant revisions to the estimated asset retirement obligations.
Asset retirement obligations are recorded as a liability at their estimated present value at the asset’s inception, with an offsetting increase to producing properties in the accompanying balance sheet which is amortized to expense on a unit-of-production basis. Periodic accretion of the discount on asset retirement obligations is recorded as expense.
Fair Value Measurements - Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The three levels related to fair value measurements are as follows:
Level 1 - Observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2 - Observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1, such as quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar assets and liabilities in markets that are not active or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data.
Level 3 - Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities. This includes certain pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies and similar techniques that use significant unobservable inputs.
The estimated fair values of cash, accounts receivable, accounts payable and indebtedness approximate their carrying amounts due to the relatively short maturity of these instruments.
Earnings (loss) per Share - Basic earnings (loss) per share amounts are calculated by dividing income available to common shareholders, after deducting preferred stock dividends, by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding. Diluted earnings per share amounts are calculated by dividing net income by the weighted average number of shares of common stock and common stock equivalents outstanding. Common stock equivalents represent shares issuable upon the assumed conversion of preferred stock, outstanding convertible notes and the assumed exercise of common stock options and warrants outstanding.
Major Customer and Concentration of Credit Risk - We estimate an allowance for doubtful accounts based on an analysis of specific customers, taking into consideration the age of past due accounts and an assessment of the customer’s ability to pay. An allowance for doubtful accounts was not needed as of December 31, 2022 or 2021.
During 2022, one customer accounted for approximately 96% of our post-harvest and midstream services revenue. Amounts due from this customer represented all of our accounts receivable at December 31, 2022. During 2021, one customer accounted for approximately 91% of our post-harvest and midstream services revenue. No amounts were due from this customer at December 31, 2021.
Our rental revenue is derived from a single lessee on a commercial warehouse owned by the Company. There were no amounts due from this customer at December 31, 2022 or 2021.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements - In December 2019, the FASB issued ASU 2019-12, Income Taxes, which enhances and simplifies various aspects of the income tax accounting guidance, including requirements such as tax basis step-up in goodwill obtained in a transaction that is not a business combination, ownership changes in investments, and interim-period accounting for enacted changes in tax law. We adopted this standard in the first quarter of 2021. Adoption of this ASU did not have a significant impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In August 2020, the FASB issued ASU 2020-06, Debt - Debt with Conversion and Other Options (Subtopic 470-20) and Derivatives and Hedging - Contracts in Entity’s Own Equity (Subtopic 815-40). The new standard reduces the number of accounting models for convertible debt instruments and convertible preferred stock and amends the guidance for the derivatives scope exception for contracts in an entity’s own equity. The standard also amends and makes targeted improvements to the related earnings per share guidance. The ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2021. The standard allows for either modified or full retrospective transition methods. The Company adopted this standard on January 1, 2022. The adoption of this ASU did not have a significant impact on our consolidated financial statements.
There are no other new accounting pronouncements that are expected to have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements.
3. Property and Equipment
Property and equipment consisted of the following:
Useful December 31,
Life (yrs)
Land
$ 96,000 $ 96,000
Warehouse 916,500 916,500
Leasehold Improvements 473,601 473,601
Machinery and equipment 5-7 1,506,447 1,506,447
Vehicles 149,440 149,440
Computer equipment and software 46,825 46,825
Office furniture and equipment 3-5 17,294 17,294
Subtotal
3,206,107 3,206,107
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization
(1,044,155 ) (625,445 )
Total property and equipment, net
$ 2,161,952 $ 2,580,662
4. Intangible and Other Assets
The following table summarizes information related to finite-lived intangible assets:
December 31, 2022 December 31, 2021
Gross
Gross
Carrying Accumulated
Carrying Accumulated
Amount Amortization Net Amount Amortization Net
Customer relationships $ 2,612,649 $ (1,362,311 ) $ 1,250,338 $ 2,612,649 $ (796,858 ) $ 1,815,791
Non-competition agreements 63,176 (42,116 ) 21,060 63,176 (21,059 ) 42,117
Total $ 2,675,825 $ (1,404,427 ) $ 1,271,398 $ 2,675,825 $ (817,917 ) $ 1,857,908
Future amortization expense for intangible assets in each of the next five years are expected to be $419 thousand for 2023, $278 thousand for 2024, $194 thousand for 2025, $130 thousand for 2026 and $86 thousand for 2027.
Other assets included $407,000 at December 31, 2021 for the Company’s option to purchase the facility located in Hopkinsville, Kentucky leased from Halcyon. Under this agreement, the Company had the option to purchase the facility on or before August 25, 2022, as amended, for a purchase price of $993 thousand. This agreement was not renewed upon its expiration. Impairment expense totaling $407 thousand was recognized in the third quarter of 2022 as a result.
5. Notes Payable - Related Parties
Notes payable - related parties consisted of the following:
December 31,
Subordinated Promissory Note to CEO $ 523,551 $ 523,551
Convertible Promissory Note to CEO 1,107,069 410,000
Secured Promissory Note to Coventry Asset Management, LTD. 1,000,000 1,000,000
Subordinated Promissory Note to Investor 200,000 250,000
Promissory Note to Investment Hunter, LLC 492,000 -
Total notes payable - related parties $ 3,322,620 $ 2,183,551
Subordinated Promissory Note to CEO - Our CEO made advances to the Company during 2020 under a subordinated promissory note in the amount of $524 thousand initially due September 30, 2021. This note was amended to a new maturity date of January 1, 2023. The note bore interest at 10% per annum. Accrued interest on this subordinated promissory note totaled $60 thousand at December 31, 2022. In January 2023, the amounts due under this note were restructured and rolled into a new Secured Promissory Note from our CEO (see Note 15).
Convertible Promissory Note to CEO - In 2021, our CEO made advances totaling $410 thousand to the Company under a convertible promissory note. Additional advances made in 2022 totaled $697 thousand. The convertible note initially matured on January 1, 2022 but was subsequently amended to extend the maturity date to January 1, 2023. The note bore interest at 10%. The principal and interest due on the convertible note were convertible, at the option of the holder, into restricted shares of the Company’s common stock at an initial conversion price of $0.50 per share but that was lowered in July 2022 to $0.30 per share. Accrued interest on this convertible promissory note totaled $107 thousand at December 31, 2022. In January 2023, the amounts due under this note were restructured and rolled into a new Secured Promissory Note from our CEO (see Note 15).
Secured Promissory Note and Warrants to Coventry Asset Management, LTD. - On December 30, 2020, the Company received proceeds from issuance of a secured promissory note in principal amount of $1 million to Coventry Asset Management, LTD, a Company stockholder. The promissory note is secured by the property acquired in the acquisition of certain assets of Halcyon. The unpaid balance of the secured promissory note bears interest at a rate of 14% per annum. The promissory note has been extended seven times including the issuance of 20,000 restricted common shares as extension fees each for the first five extensions and the issuance of 50,000 restricted common shares for the last two extensions. The maturity date of the promissory note is December 31, 2023, as amended. If before December 31, 2023, the Company raises new equity capital of $5 million or more, then the full amount outstanding under the promissory note is due within five days. As amended, principal payments of $250 thousand each are due June 1, 2023 and August 31, 2023. Accrued interest on this secured note totaled $200 thousand at December 31, 2022.
Subordinated Promissory Note and Warrants to Investor - On December 30, 2020, the Company issued a subordinated promissory note in principal amount of $500 thousand to an accredited investor who is also a Company stockholder. The Company previously made principal payment totaling $300 thousand. The unpaid balance of the Subordinated Note bears interest at a rate of 10% per annum. The subordinated note principal together with accrued and unpaid interest was due, as previously amended, on March 31, 2022 but was extended to June 30, 2022. On March 1, 2023, the Company paid $240 thousand in full repayment of this note and accrued interest thereon.
The holder of the subordinated note received a warrant to purchase 500 thousand shares of common stock exercisable for cash at an exercise price of $0.352 per share. As consideration for the April 2022 extension, the term of this warrant was extended by one year to December 30, 2023. The Company recognized $69 thousand of interest expense in 2022 for the modification related to this extension of the warrant term.
Promissory Note to Investment Hunter, LLC - In 2022, Investment Hunter, LLC, a Texas LLC controlled by our CEO, made advances totaling $492 thousand to the Company under a promissory note due January 1, 2023, as amended. If the Company raises new equity capital of $3 million or more, then the full amount outstanding under the note is due within five days. The note bears interest at 10% per annum. Accrued interest on this subordinated promissory note totaled $43 thousand at December 31, 2022.
6. Other Indebtedness
Mortgage Payable and Operating Lease -The Company is obligated under a mortgage payable dated September 15, 2014 secured by its warehouse property located in Denver, Colorado. The note has been amended a number of times to a maturity date of October 1, 2023. In the latest extension, the Company made a principal payment of $25 thousand plus accrued interest in January 2023 and agreed to make seven additional monthly principal payments of $25 thousand plus accrued interest each beginning on March 1, 2023. A final payment of $50 thousand plus accrued interest is due at maturity. The interest rate on the mortgage payable is 12%. If before the final maturity of the mortgage payable, the Company raises new equity capital of $5 million or more, then the full amount outstanding is due within ten days.
The Company leases the Denver warehouse property to a tenant under an operating lease which was renewed with a new tenant and extended to August 1, 2023 for a monthly rent of $7.5 thousand. The lease requires a true-up with the tenant for property taxes and insurance paid by the Company and requires the tenant to maintain the interior and exterior of the warehouse (except for the roof). The lease provides for a rent abatement in the first and last month of the contracted extension. Minimum future rents for 2023 are $52 thousand.
Paycheck Protection Program Loan - Congress created the Paycheck Protection Program (“PPP”) under the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (“CARES Act”) to provide forgivable loans to eligible small businesses facing economic hardship to retain U.S. employees on their payroll during the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (“COVID-19”) pandemic. PPP loan recipients may be eligible to have their loans forgiven if the funds were used for eligible expenses. On April 29, 2020, we received disbursement of an approved PPP loan in the amount of $25 thousand. The Company received notice that the PPP Loan principal and interest thereon was fully forgiven on April 20, 2021.
7. Leases
Office Space - The Company leases office space in Fort Worth, Texas for managerial offices. This lease requires monthly payments of $2 thousand and is month-to-month. Lease expense for this facility totaled $24 thousand for 2022 and $22 thousand for 2021.
Hemp Processing Operating Facility - The Company leases its operating facility in Kentucky from Oz Capital, LLC, a related party, under a lease expiring May 31, 2024. The lease provides for monthly payments of $10 thousand. Oz Capital, LLC is responsible for all taxes and maintenance under the lease. Lease expense for this facility totaled $123 thousand for 2022 and $119 thousand for 2021. A right-of-use asset and lease liability is recorded for this lease. As the lease does not provide an implicit rate, the Company used its estimated incremental borrowing rate of 10% in determining the present value of the lease payments.
Future Bitcoin Mining Premises - In 2022, the Company entered a five-year commercial lease for land and premises in Arkansas. We expect to use these premises as a future Bitcoin mining location because of its favorable power rates and land availability. The lease commences once the Company begins receiving power for its operations conducted at the location. The monthly rent will vary from a minimum of $1 thousand per megawatt of power usage monthly up to $4 thousand per megawatt monthly depending on the average power usage over a trailing 90-day period and the price of bitcoin. We anticipate commencing operations at the leased premises in 2023.
8. Commitments and Contingencies
Litigation - From time to time, we are subject to various litigation and other claims in the normal course of business. Below is a discussion of specific matters. We cannot estimate the ultimate outcome of these matters.
Evergreen Sustainable Enterprises, Inc. (formerly Generation Hemp, Inc.) v. Colorado Mill Equipment, LLC
The defendant sold to the Company a faulty piece of equipment for $16 thousand and will not refund to the Company the purchase price after repeated attempts to return their equipment. An original lawsuit filed by the Company against Colorado Mill Equipment in January 2022 in Dallas County was subsequently dismissed due to jurisdiction. A second lawsuit was subsequently filed in El Paso County, Colorado and is currently pending.
Halcyon Thruput, LLC, Plaintiff v. United National Insurance Company, Defendant, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Dallas Division, Case No. 3:21-CV-3136-K
Halcyon Thruput, LLC (Halcyon) obtained an all-risks commercial insurance policy, including an Equipment Breakdown Endorsement (Policy) from United National Insurance Company (UNIC) to provide substantial coverages for Halcyon Thruput LLC’s (Halcyon) $1.2 million hemp processing dryer (Dryer) at its facility in Hopkinsville, Kentucky. During the Policy period, the Dryer caught fire due to the Dryer being defectively designed.
While UNIC has paid a number of Halcyon’s claims, Halcyon’s claim for the cost of the replacement Dryer of $1.5 million was denied as described below.
Buyer, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, pursuant to an Asset Purchase Agreement as twice amended, then acquired all the assets of Halcyon, except for the right to the proceeds of UNIC’s insurance policy since the Policy prohibited assignment. Halcyon and Buyer agreed that Buyer’s principal, Gary C. Evans, had the right to control the litigation, engage counsel for Halcyon and make all decisions relating to any proceeds received in the litigation by settlement or otherwise.
Halcyon’s suit against UNIC, which was removed to federal court, seeks over $1 million plus statutory interest on that sum from August 10, 2020 for violating the Texas Insurance Code’s requirement that claims be promptly paid, additional statutory penalties, and attorneys’ fees. Certain documents have been executed between the Company, Halcyon and legal counsel, which provide for a sharing of costs and expenses and awards, if any, against UNIC. Mediation of the case was held in April 2022 where no agreement was reached by the parties. Depositions of the Company’s expert witnesses were completed in July 2022 and of UNIC’s representatives in September 2022.
In August 2022, the Company received a second payment from UNIC of $357 thousand as a partial settlement of this claim, which amount was reported as other income in the consolidated financial statements.
JDONE, LLC v. Grand Traverse Holdings, LLC and John Gallegos, Denver District Court Case No. 2019CV33723
JDONE, LLC (“JDONE”), a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company and landlord of a commercial warehouse building in Denver, brought suit against Grand Traverse Holdings, LLC for default of its commercial lease of the warehouse from JDONE. This case settled in October 2022 and the Company received $122 thousand from the defendant, which amount was reported as other income in the consolidated financial statements.
KBSIII Tower at Lake Carolyn, LLC and Prime US-Tower at Lake Carolyn, LLC (collectively - “KBSIII”) v. Energy Hunter Resources, Inc.
Plaintiff/Counterdefendant KBSIII was seeking lost rent on office space for periods after EHR vacated office premises located in Las Colinas, Texas. EHR filed a counter suit alleging specific damages due to uninhabitable premises of the office space due to the intolerable conduct of other tenants located on the same floor. On December 23, 2020, the trial court entered a summary judgment against EHR for $231 thousand. The judgment provides for post-judgment interest at a rate of 5% per annum until paid and further provides for additional amounts owed should EHR pursue unsuccessful appeals to higher courts. At December 31, 2022, the Company had accrued $253 thousand for this judgment, which is exclusively an EHR obligation.
Ogborn-Mihm, LLP v. Evergreen Sustainable Enterprises, Inc. (formerly Generation Hemp, Inc.), JDONE, LLC and Gary C. Evans
The Company was recently made aware of litigation filed against it in the District Court of Denver from a law firm which was previously engaged by the Company. While none of the parties have been officially served, the alleged amount being sought from the Company is less than $50,000.
9. Income Taxes
No amounts were recorded for income tax expense during the years ended December 31, 2022 or 2021. A reconciliation of the expected statutory federal tax and the total income tax expense from continuing operations was as follows:
Year Ended December 31,
Federal statutory rate $ (1,462,067 ) $ (2,056,480 )
State income taxes, net (141,438 ) (198,940 )
Change in valuation allowance 1,630,110 3,655,210
Change in state tax rates -
(178,644 )
True-up of prior year deferred items -
(929,450 )
Other, net (26,605 ) (291,696 )
Total income tax expense $ -
$ -
The tax effect of temporary differences that gave rise to significant components of deferred tax assets and liabilities consisted of the following:
December 31,
Assets:
Net operating loss carryforwards $ 5,471,098 $ 4,960,487
Stock-based compensation 2,142,362 1,046,464
Property and equipment (24,310 ) 33,803
Intangible assets 216,726 135,012
Subtotal 7,805,876 6,175,766
Valuation allowance (7,805,876 ) (6,175,766 )
Net deferred tax asset $ -
$ -
The Company has federal net operating loss (“NOL”) carryforwards of approximately $23.8 million at December 31, 2022, of which approximately $6.5 million begin to expire in 2034 and the remainder have no expiration. The Company estimates that a majority of its NOL carryforwards are subject to annual limitations under Internal Revenue Code Section 382 as a result of ownership changes at various times including in the Transaction. These NOL carryforwards may never be utilized by the Company.
The Company is delinquent in filing its 2021 Federal and state tax returns.
10. Equity
Series A Preferred Stock - Our Series A Preferred Stock was originally issued in connection with HTF’s acquisition of EHR in 2019. On September 8, 2021, holders of the Company’s Series A Preferred Stock elected to convert such shares into shares of the Company’s common stock. As a result, 6,328,948 shares of Series A Preferred Stock were converted into 75,947,376 shares of common stock, with each share of Series A Preferred Stock converting into 12 shares of restricted common stock pursuant to the applicable Certificate of Designations.
Series B Preferred Stock Units - On December 30, 2020, the Company sold to certain accredited investors, including Gary C. Evans, our Chief Executive Officer, an aggregate of 135 preferred stock units comprised of (i) one share of Series B Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock, no par value, and (ii) one warrant exercisable for 50 thousand shares of common stock of the Company until December 30, 2022 at an exercise price of $0.352 per share.
The sale of the preferred stock units for $10 thousand each resulted in aggregate gross proceeds of approximately $1.35 million, before deducting estimated offering expenses payable by the Company. Substantially all of the proceeds raised in the offering were used to fund the acquisition of assets of Halcyon, expenses related thereto and for general corporate purposes.
Each share of Series B Preferred Stock is initially convertible into 25,000 shares of common stock, subject to adjustment. Holders of Series B Preferred Stock are entitled to receive dividends of 6.00% per annum based on the stated value equal to $10 thousand per share. Except as otherwise required by law, the Series B Preferred Stock does not have voting rights. However, as long as any shares of Series B Preferred Stock are outstanding, the Company will not, without the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the then outstanding shares of the Series B Preferred Stock, (a) alter or change adversely the powers, preferences or rights given to the Series B Preferred Stock, (b) alter or amend the related certificate of designation, (c) amend its certificate of incorporation or other charter documents in any manner that adversely affects any rights of the holders of Series B Preferred Stock, (d) repay, repurchase or offer to repay, repurchase or otherwise acquire more than a de minimis number of shares of its common stock, (e) enter into any agreement with respect to any of the foregoing, or (f) pay cash dividends or distributions on any equity securities of the Company other than pursuant to the terms of the outstanding Series B Preferred Stock. The Series B Preferred Stock does not have a preference upon any liquidation, dissolution or winding-up of the Company.
Any or all of the Series B Preferred Stock may be converted, at their holder’s option, into 25,000 shares of common stock, as adjusted for any stock dividends, splits, combinations or similar events.
At any time after the occurrence of a “Qualifying Event,” the Company, upon 5-day written notice, shall have the right to cause each share of Series B Preferred Stock (and all accrued in-kind dividends with respect thereto) to be converted into common stock. For purposes of this automatic conversion of the Series B Preferred Stock, a “Qualifying Event” shall have occurred if (A) (1) the rolling five-trading day volume-weighted average trading price of shares of the common stock exceeds $1.00, and (2) there shall be an effective registration statement under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended covering all of the shares of common stock which would be issuable upon conversion of all of the outstanding shares of Series B Preferred Stock or (B) the Company closes a firm commitment underwriting of the common stock on a Form S-1 Registration Statement with aggregate gross proceeds of at least $5 million at a price per share equal to or greater than $1.00. In each instance, a conversion may not be made unless the Company has filed an amendment to its Articles of Incorporation effecting an increase in its authorized common stock so that the Company has a sufficient number of authorized and unissued shares of common stock so as to permit the conversion of all outstanding shares.
The Series B Preferred Stock may be redeemed by the Company for its stated value, plus accrued and unpaid dividends, at any time. Initially, redemption payments of 12.5% each of the total amount of Series B Preferred Stock then outstanding plus accrued dividends were due from the Company to each Holder of Series B Preferred Stock at the end of each calendar quarter of 2021. The first required redemption payments totaling $137 thousand were made in April 2021. In May, June and October of 2021, the three holders of the Series B Preferred Stock, including the Company’s chief executive officer, entered into transactions in which they accepted the mandatory redemption payment required pursuant to the Series B Preferred Stock certificate of designation in a number of Series B Units to effectively waive the redemption requirement. All other terms of the Series B Units remain unchanged and the holders’ ownership interest in the Series B Preferred Units remains the same as it was before such transactions.
Common Stock - At December 31, 2022, the Company had 113,204,002 common shares outstanding. Following is a discussion of common stock issuances during the periods presented:
● Acquisition of Certain Assets of Halcyon - In January 2021, the Company issued 6,250,000 shares of common stock valued at $2.5 million ($0.40 per share; restricted from trading for a period of up to one year) in the acquisition.
● 2021 First Quarter Issuances of Common Stock Units - In the first quarter of 2021, the Company issued 800,000 common stock units for total proceeds of $400,000. Each common stock unit consisted of one share of common stock and a warrant for the purchase of two shares of common stock for $0.50 each. Each warrant is exercisable any time before its expiration on the second anniversary of its issuance. The Company allocated the total proceeds based on the relative fair values of the common stock and warrants. The fair value of the warrants was determined using an options valuation model with key assumptions including a risk-free interest rate of 0.11% and historical volatility of 272%. A total of $263 thousand was allocated to the warrants and reported in additional paid-in capital.
● Warrant Exercises - In the first quarter of 2021, the Company received approximately $3 million for the exercise of 8,428,976 outstanding warrants. In the fourth quarter of 2021, the Company received $375 thousand for the exercise of 1,065,340 outstanding warrants.
● Issuances for Exchange or Conversion of Debt - The Company issued a total of 1,618,660 common shares for the exchange or conversion of outstanding indebtedness totaling $2.2 million in the first quarter of 2021.
● Issuance to Vendor for Services - In the third quarter of 2021, the Company issued 125,000 common shares valued at $117.5 thousand to a vendor for services performed.
● Issuance for Extension of Secured Note - The Company issued 20,000 common shares valued at $18 thousand as consideration to extend the maturity of a senior note in the third quarter of 2021.
● Issuance for Conversion of Series A Preferred Stock - As noted above, in the third quarter of 2021, the Company issued 75,947,376 common shares for the conversion of all outstanding shares of its Series A Preferred Stock.
● 2021 Fourth Quarter Issuances of Common Stock Units - In the fourth quarter of 2021, the Company issued 958,333 common stock units to accredited investors for total proceeds of $575 thousand. Each common stock unit consists of one share of common stock and a warrant for the purchase of one share of common stock for $0.60 each. Each warrant is exercisable any time before its expiration on the second anniversary of its issuance. The Company allocated the total proceeds based on the relative fair values of the common stock and warrants. The fair value of the warrants was determined using an options valuation model with key assumptions including risk-free interest rates ranging from 0.48% to 0.70% and historical volatility ranging from 237% to 258%. A total of $277 thousand was allocated to the warrants and reported in additional paid-in capital..
● Issuance for Extensions of Secured Note - The Company issued 110,000 common shares valued at $52.6 thousand as consideration for extensions of the maturity of a senior note in 2022. Refer to Note 5.
Common Stock Warrants Outstanding - Following is a summary of warrants outstanding as of December 31, 2022:
# of
Warrants Price
(each) Expiration Date Method of Exercise
Issued in December 2020 with subordinated note to investor (1) 500,000 $ 0.352 December 30, 2023 Cash
Issued in Q1 2021 with common stock units (1) 1,600,000 $ 0.500 January-February, 2023 Cash
Issued in Q4 2021 with common stock units (1) 958,333 $ 0.600 October-December, 2023 Cash
Total warrants outstanding at December 31, 2022 3,058,333
(1) May be redeemed for $0.0001 per warrant at the Company’s option with 30 days advanced notice should the weighted average market price of common stock exceed $1.00 for any five out of seven consecutive trading days with a minimum average daily trading volume for such seven-day period of at least 25,000 shares of common stock.
Following is a summary of outstanding stock warrants activity for the periods presented:
# of
Warrants Weighted
Average
Price
Warrants as of January 1, 2021 22,988,632 $ 0.353
Issued 2,558,333 $ 0.537
Cancelled (7,244,316 ) $ 0.352
Exercised (9,494,316 ) $ 0.352
Warrants as of December 31, 2021 8,808,333 $ 0.407
Canceled (5,750,000 ) $ 0.354
Warrants as of December 31, 2022 3,058,333 $ 0.507
11. Stock-Based Compensation
We award restricted stock or stock options as incentive compensation to employees and compensation to our Board of Directors for services. Generally, these awards include vesting periods of up to three years from the date of grant.
The 2021 Omnibus Incentive Plan (“2021 Plan”) was adopted by our Board on July 1, 2021. The 2021 Plan provides for the initial reservation of 15 million shares of common stock for issuance, and provides that the maximum number of shares that may be issued pursuant to the exercise of ISOs is 15 million. On the one-year anniversary date of the 2021 Plan, the number of shares of common stock reserved for issuance automatically increased to 20% of the fully diluted common shares outstanding, including shares issuable upon the conversion of preferred shares, as calculated on an as-converted basis.
In the first quarter of 2021, the Company issued 500,000 restricted shares valued at $155 thousand as incentive compensation to two executives who joined the Company. Compensation expense related to these awards totaled $155 thousand for 2021. These awards became fully vested in January 2022.
In the fourth quarter of 2021, the Company awarded options for 13,850,000 shares of the Company’s common stock as incentive compensation to management and the Board of Directors. One-third of the awarded options vested immediately with the remaining options vesting in two equal annual tranches over the next two years. Vested options may be exercised at any time until their expiration after 10 years at an exercise price of $0.76 per share. Unvested options are forfeited upon termination of service. The fair value of the awards at the date of grant of $10.5 million was determined using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. Key assumptions included a risk-free interest rate ranging from 1.18% to 1.28%, historical volatility ranging from 331% to 643% and an expected life of the stock options ranging from five to six years.
In the third quarter of 2022, the Company awarded options for 1,915,000 shares of the Company’s common stock as incentive compensation to its CEO and board of directors. The awarded options vest over the next three years. Vested options may be exercised at any time until their expiration ranging from eight to 10 years at their exercise prices ranging from $0.30 to $0.33 per share. Unvested options are forfeited upon termination of service. The fair value of the awards at the date of grant of $576 thousand was determined using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. Key assumptions included a risk-free interest rate ranging from 2.87% to 3.03%, historical volatility ranging from 251% to 408% and an expected life of the stock options ranging from four to seven years.
We recognized $4.7 million of compensation expense in 2022 and $1.4 million in 2021 for option awards. As of December 31, 2022, there was $2.0 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to options to be recognized over a remaining weighted average period of 17 months.
The following table summarizes options outstanding, as well as activity for the periods presented:
Shares Weighted
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
Outstanding at January 1, 2021 -
$ -
$ -
-
Granted 13,850,000 $ 0.76 $ 0.76 -
Outstanding at December 31, 2021 13,850,000 $ 0.76 $ 0.76 -
Granted 1,915,000 $ 0.30 $ 0.31 -
Outstanding at December 31, 2022 15,765,000 $ 0.70 $ 0.71 -
The remaining weighted average contractual life of exercisable options at December 31, 2022 was nine years.
12. Discontinued Operations
In 2019, management determined to fully divest of EHR’s oil and gas activities. As such, these activities are presented as discontinued operations for each of the periods presented. The following is a summary of the carrying amounts of major classes of assets and liabilities of the discontinued operations to assets and liabilities held for sale:
December 31,
Assets:
Oil and natural gas properties held for sale, at cost $ 1,874,849 $ 1,874,849
Accumulated DD&A (1,874,849 ) (1,874,849 )
Total assets of discontinued operations held for sale $ -
$ -
Liabilities:
Accrued liabilities $ 61,701 $ 48,997
Asset retirement obligations 52,368 52,368
Revenue payable 52,117 52,117
Current liabilities of discontinued operations held for sale 166,186 153,482
Asset retirement obligations -
Long-term liabilities of discontinued operations held for sale 207,197 162,948
Total liabilities of discontinued operations held for sale $ 373,383 $ 316,430
The following is a summary of the major classes of line items constituting loss on discontinued operations shown in the consolidated statements of operations:
For the year ended
December 31,
Revenue -
Oil and gas sales $ 147,828 $ 116,710
Costs and Expenses:
Lease operating expense 163,352 134,590
Accretion of asset retirement obligations 44,249 14,333
Total costs and expenses 207,601 148,923
Loss from discontinued operations $ (59,773 ) $ (32,213 )
13. Supplemental Cash Flow Information
For the year ended
December 31,
Cash paid for interest $ 68,321 $ 138,736
Cash paid for taxes -
-
Noncash investing and financing activities:
Acquisition of certain assets of Halcyon Thruput, LLC
- issuance of common shares -
2,500,000
- issuance of subordinated note -
850,000
- assumption of Halcyon bank note -
995,614
Series B preferred stock dividend payable 80,002 58,312
Issuance of common stock units previously subscribed -
50,000
Issuances of common shares for exchange or conversion of debt -
2,160,269
Conversion of Series A preferred stock into common stock - 4,975,503
14. Earnings (Loss) per Share
The following is the computation of earnings (loss) per basic and diluted share:
For the year ended
December 31,
Amounts attributable to Generation Hemp:
Numerator
Loss from continuing operations attributable to common stockholders $ (6,975,740 ) $ (9,792,532 )
Income (loss) from discontinued operations (56,031 ) (30,196 )
Less: preferred stock dividends (80,002 ) (74,812 )
Net loss attributable to common stockholders $ (7,111,773 ) $ (9,897,540 )
Denominator
Weighted average shares used to compute basic EPS 113,163,591 57,159,659
Dilutive effect of convertible note 1,164,773 1,164,773
Dilutive effect of preferred stock 2,950,000 55,075,900
Dilutive effect of common stock options 229,762 709,981
Dilutive effect of common stock warrants 1,320,951 11,022,542
Weighted average shares used to compute diluted EPS 118,829,077 125,132,855
Earnings (loss) per share:
Loss from continuing operations
Basic $ (0.06 ) $ (0.17 )
Diluted $ (0.06 ) $ (0.17 )
Loss from discontinued operations
Basic $ -
$ -
Diluted $ -
$ -
Earnings (loss) per share
Basic $ (0.06 ) $ (0.17 )
Diluted $ (0.06 ) $ (0.17 )
The computation of diluted earnings per common share excludes the assumed conversion of the Series B Preferred Stock and outstanding convertible notes and exercise of common stock options and warrants in periods when we report a loss. The dilutive effect of the assumed exercise of outstanding options and warrants was calculated using the treasury stock method.
15. Subsequent Events
Issuance of common stock options - In January 2023, the Company issued options for the purchase of 100,000 shares of common stock each to our three directors as board fees for the year. The exercise price of the options is $0.30 and they have a ten year term. One-third of the options vested immediately. The remaining options vest in equal tranches over the next two years.
Commencement of Bitcoin Operations and Acquisition of Toro Energía Sociedad Anonima - In January 2023, the Company announced a new strategic direction into sustainable energy projects, starting with bitcoin mining. The Company’s name was changed to Evergreen Sustainable Enterprises, Inc. (“EGSE”) in March 2023. The Company’s existing operations will continue to be maintained as a fully operating wholly-owned subsidiary.
On January 9, 2023, the Company purchased 80% of Toro Energía Sociedad Anonima (“Toro”), a Costa Rican corporation with ownership of a hydroelectric dam in Costa Rica. The source of approximately one megawatt of power produced from the hydroelectric dam (six generators) will be used to power new Bitcoin mining machines at an extremely low cost. The transaction included seller-financed debt of $985 thousand. The seller-financed debt has a term of 10 years and a 9.5% per annum variable interest rate (based on the prime rate) with straight line amortization. The seller-financed debt is secured by pledge of the Toro Dam.
The purchase price for 80% of Toro’s equity was $1.4 million. These amounts were paid in cash from proceeds of a Secured Promissory Note (“Secured Note”) with the Gary C. Evans, CEO of the Company (‘Evans”). Under the terms of the Secured Note, (a) the Company and Evans restructured (i) the Subordinated Promissory Note dated November 20, 2020 and (ii) Convertible Promissory Note dated July 20, 2021, such that all accrued and unpaid interest on each note were rolled into a new Secured Note, (b) Evans lent the Company $500 thousand on January 9, 2023 and $969 thousand on January 10, 2023. The Secured Note has a maturity date of July 15, 2023 and bears interest at the rate of 10.00% per annum. The Secured Note has a conversion feature which permits Evans to convert at the Maturity Date then outstanding principal and interest at a conversion price of $0.275 (the closing price of the Company’s stock on January 9, 2023).
The Toro Dam is located approximately 25 miles from San Jose between two volcano craters. The site generates all its energy from green resources with a proven 98% run time over the years and has a full-time staff in place under a new Operating & Maintenance Agreement.
Hydroelectric power is a clean and renewable energy source that is used to generate electricity by harnessing the energy of falling water and can provide a reliable and a very cost-effective source of energy for bitcoin mining operations. Hydroelectric power can help reduce the carbon footprint of cryptocurrency mining, as many cryptocurrencies are produced using fossil fuels, which continues to contribute to greenhouse gas emissions and climate change. By using hydroelectric power, bitcoin mining can be made more environmentally friendly and sustainable and can help improve the stability and reliability of cryptocurrency networks. Hydroelectric power is a relatively stable and reliable source of energy, compared to other sources such as coal or fossil fuels, which can be prone to price fluctuations and supply disruptions. The Company has committed to acquire 240 new Bitmain S19J Pro+ ASIC miners that will be deployed at the Toro Dam in the first half of 2023.
Subordinated Promissory Note and Warrants to Investor - As discussed in Note 5, on March 1, 2023, the Company paid $240 thousand in full repayment of this note and accrued interest thereon.
Hemp Processing Operating Facility - The Company’s lease of its operating facility in Kentucky from Oz Capital, LLC, a related party, was amended in January 2023. As amended, the lease payment was increased to $20.5 thousand monthly beginning in March 2023. The lease expiration date of May 31, 2024 was not changed.
Issuance of Series C Preferred Units - In the first quarter of 2023, the Company issued six Series C Preferred Units in a private placement for total proceeds of $300 thousand. Each unit consists of one share of 8.50% Series C Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock and 5,000 warrants to acquire one share of common stock. Cumulative dividends at 8.5% of the stated value of the Series C Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock are payable each calendar quarter end in cash or additional shares of Series C Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock, at the Company’s option.
Each share of Series C Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock is convertible, at the holder’s option, into 100 thousand shares of our common stock at any time. It is subject to automatic conversion if (a) the rolling five (5)-trading day volume-weighted average trading price of shares of our common stock exceeds $0.75 and (b) there shall be an effective registration statement under the Securities Act of 1933. The conversion ratio may be adjusted for certain dilutive issuances or in the event a dividend is paid on our common stock. The Series C Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock is redeemable at any time at the Company’s option.
The warrants are exercisable for a cash exercise price of $0.50 per share and expire in three years. The warrants may be redeemed at the Company’s option if after one year from issuance, the trading price of the Company’s common stock exceeds $0.875 over a ten consecutive day trading period having a minimum trading volume of 25 thousand shares daily.
Promissory Note to Investment Hunter, LLC - In the first quarter of 2023, Investment Hunter, LLC, a Texas LLC controlled by our CEO, made advances totaling $300 thousand to the Company.
Secured Promissory Note to a Director and our CEO - On April 19, 2023, Razorback I, LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, borrowed $300 thousand under a secured promissory note from one of our directors and our CEO. Proceeds from the note are expected to be utilized in the acquisition of land in Arkansas to expand bitcoin mining operations.
The promissory note matures on April 15, 2024. Interest accrues at 12% per annum and is due quarterly beginning on July 15, 2023. The holders have the option to convert the outstanding principal and interest into restricted shares at a conversion price of $0.30 per share of common stock.
The secured promissory note is collateralized by a pledge of 100% of the ownership interest of Razorback I, LLC and has been guaranteed by the Company as well.
* * * * *
Supplemental Oil and Gas Information
(Unaudited)
Oil and Gas Reserve Information. Proved oil and gas reserves are those quantities of crude oil, natural gas, condensate, and NGLs, which by analysis of geoscience and engineering data, can be estimated with reasonable certainty to be economically producible from a given date forward, from known reservoirs, and under existing economic conditions, operating methods, and government regulations. Estimated proved developed oil and gas reserves can be expected to be recovered through existing wells with existing equipment and operating methods. The Company reports all estimated proved reserves held under production-sharing arrangements utilizing the “economic interest” method.
Proved oil and gas reserves have been estimated by independent, third-party petroleum engineers, Mire & Associates, Inc. These reserve estimates have been prepared in compliance with the Securities and Exchange Commission rules and accounting standards based on the 12-month unweighted first-day-of-the-month average price for the year.
There are numerous uncertainties inherent in estimating quantities of proved reserves and projecting future rates of production and timing of development expenditures. The reserve data in the following tables only represent estimates and should not be construed as being exact.
The following reserves schedule sets forth the changes in estimated quantities of proved crude oil reserves:
Crude Oil (Bbls) Natural Gas (mcf) Total (Boe)
Total proved reserves:
Balance at December 31, 2020 19,560 13,850 21,868
Revisions of previous estimates (10,895 ) (13,247 ) (13,102 )
Production (1,675 ) (603 ) (1,776 )
Balance at December 31, 2021 6,990 - 6,990
Revisions of previous estimates
Production (1,508 ) (47 ) (1,555 )
Balance at December 31, 2022 5,660 - 5,660
Proved developed reserves as of:
December 31, 2020 2,660 - 2,660
December 31, 2021 6,990 - 6,990
December 31, 2022 5,660 - 5,660
Proved undeveloped reserves as of:
December 31, 2020 16,900 13,850 19,208
December 31, 2021 - - -
December 31, 2022 - - -
The decrease in proved quantities for 2021 was due principally to revisions of previous reserve estimates after undeveloped reserves were determined to be non-economic. The decrease in proved quantities for 2022 was due principally to annual production.
Costs Incurred in Oil and Natural Gas Property Acquisitions and Development Activities. Costs incurred by the Company in oil and natural gas acquisitions and development are presented below:
For the year ended
December 31,
Acquisitions:
Proved $ - $ -
Unproved - -
Exploration - -
Development - -
Costs incurred $ - $ -
Capitalized Costs. The following table sets forth the capitalized costs and associated accumulated depreciation, depletion, and amortization relating to the Company’s oil and gas acquisition, exploration, and development activities:
December 31,
Proved properties $ 621,198 $ 621,198
Unproved properties 1,253,651 1,253,651
1,874,849 1,874,849
Accumulated DD&A and impairment (1,874,849 ) (1,874,849 )
Total $ - $ -
Future Net Cash Flows. Future cash inflows as of December 31, 2022 and 2021 were calculated using an unweighted arithmetic average of oil and gas prices in effect on the first day of each month in the respective year, except where prices are defined by contractual arrangements. Operating costs, production and ad valorem taxes and future development costs are based on current costs with no escalation. Future development costs include abandonment and dismantlement costs.
The following table sets forth unaudited information concerning future net cash flows for proved oil and gas reserves, net of income tax expense. Income tax expense has been computed using expected future tax rates and giving effect to tax deductions and credits available, under current laws, and which relate to oil and gas producing activities. This information does not purport to present the fair market value of the Company’s oil and gas assets, but does present a standardized disclosure concerning possible future net cash flows that would result under the assumptions used.
December 31,
Future cash inflows $ 522,560 $ 454,030
Future production costs (296,270 ) (278,870 )
Future development costs (34,280 ) (34,280 )
Future income tax expense - -
Future net cash flows 192,010 140,880
10% annual discount for estimated timing of cash flows (88,800 ) (72,250 )
Discounted future net cash flows $ 103,210 $ 68,630
The following table sets forth the principal sources of change in the discounted future net cash flows:
December 31,
Balance, beginning of period $ 68,630 $ 63,760
Sales, net of production costs 15,524 17,880
Net change in prices and production costs 9,984 245,615
Changes in future development costs - (226,800 )
Revision of quantities 2,209 (38,201 )
Accretion of discount 6,863 6,376
Balance, end of period $ 103,210 $ 68,630
* * * * *

---

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
None.

---

ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures. The Company carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of its disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Exchange Act Rules. This evaluation was done as of the end of the fiscal year by and under the supervision of the Company’s principal executive officer (who is also the principal financial officer). Based upon that evaluation, the principal executive officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of December 31, 2022. There have been no significant changes in our internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect the internal controls subsequent to the date we completed the evaluation.
Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) of the 1934 Act. Management has assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2022 based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
As a result of this assessment, management identified a material weakness in internal control over financial reporting related to the accounting for business combination transactions. Management has concluded that this deficiency constitutes a material weakness. As a result of the material weakness discussed above, management has concluded that the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was ineffective as of December 31, 2022. Notwithstanding the material weakness, the Company’s management has concluded that the consolidated financial statements, included in the 2022 Annual Report on Form 10-K, fairly present, in all material respects, our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented in conformity with generally accepted accounting standards.
Management Plans to Remediate Material Weakness. The Company has begun the process of designing and implementing effective internal control measures to improve its internal controls over financial reporting and remediate the reported material weakness. The Company’s efforts include implementing additional reviews of business combination transactions and modifying the Company’s instructions to valuation specialists and reviews of their workproduct. We will consider the material weakness remediated after the applicable controls operate for a sufficient period of time, and management has concluded, through testing, that the controls are operating effectively.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. We regularly review our system of internal control over financial reporting and make changes to our processes and systems to improve controls and increase efficiency, while ensuring that we maintain an effective internal control environment. Changes may include such activities as implementing new, more efficient systems, consolidating activities and migrating processes.
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended December 31, 2022 that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Limitations on Controls. Our disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting are designed to provide reasonable assurance of achieving their objectives as specified above. Management does not expect, however, that our disclosure controls and procedures or our internal control over financial reporting will prevent or detect all error and fraud. Any control system, no matter how well designed and operated, is based upon certain assumptions and can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that its objectives will be met. Further, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that misstatements due to error or fraud will not occur or that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected.

---

ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 9B. Other Information
None.

---

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
The following persons are our executive officers and directors and hold the offices set forth opposite their names.
Name
Age
Position
Gary C. Evans
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
Melissa Pagen
Senior Vice President, Corporate Development of the Company
Jack Sibley
Vice President, Operations of the Company, and Co-CEO of GENH Halcyon
Watt Stephens
Vice President, Corporate Development of the Company and Secretary of GENH Halcyon
Joe McClaugherty
Lead Director
Gary D. Elliston
Director
John Harris
Director
The following is a brief account of the business experience of each of our directors and executive officers:
Gary C. Evans, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer. Gary C. Evans is a serial entrepreneur. Mr. Evans previously led Magnum Hunter Resources Corporation for seven years, a NYSE listed public energy company specializing in unconventional resource plays predominately in the Appalachian Basin. Mr. Evans was also founder and CEO of Eureka Hunter Holdings, LLC, a mid-stream gas gathering company transporting and managing up to 1 BCF of daily natural gas volumes from wells producing in West Virginia and Ohio on approximately 200 miles of newly constructed pipeline during the similar seven-year period. Additionally, Mr. Evans previously founded and served as the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Magnum Hunter Resources Inc. (MHRI), a NYSE listed company, for twenty years before selling MHRI to Cimarex Energy for approximately $2.2 billion in June 2005. Later that year, Mr. Evans formed Wind Hunter Energy, LLC, a renewable energy company which was subsequently acquired in December 2006 by GreenHunter Energy, Inc., an emerging water resource company focusing on oil field water management and clean water technologies active in the Marcellus and Utica resource plays in Appalachia. As founder, Mr. Evans has served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of GreenHunter Energy, Inc. since December 2006 until May 2016 upon the sale of its assets to a private equity fund.
Throughout his career, Mr. Evans has raised various forms of capital on Wall Street that has exceeded $6 Billion. Mr. Evans serves as a Director of Novavax Inc., a NASDAQ listed clinical-stage vaccine biotechnology company (Covid-19 Vaccine) with a market capitalization of approximately $20 Billion, where he has previously served as Chairman, CEO and Lead Director. Mr. Evans was recognized by Ernst and Young as the Southwest Area 2004 Entrepreneur of the Year for the Energy Sector and was subsequently inducted into the World Hall of Fame for Ernst & Young Entrepreneurs. Mr. Evans was also recognized as the Energy Industry Leader of the year in 2013 and chosen by Finance Monthly in 2013 as one of the most respected CEO’s. Mr. Evans was chosen as the Best CEO in the “Large Company” category by Texas Top Producers in 2013. He additionally won the Deal Maker of the Year Award in 2013 by Finance Monthly. Mr. Evans presently serves on the board of directors of U.S. Antimony, a NYSE listed company. Mr. Evans serves on the Board of the Maguire Energy Institute at Southern Methodist University and speaks regularly at both hemp and energy industry conferences and on national television networks around the world on the current affairs of the energy industry.
Melissa Pagen, Senior Vice-President, Corporate Development of the Company. Prior to joining the Company, Melissa Pagen built over twenty years of professional and executive experience in managerial and officer positions in several industries - both in the private and public sectors. With a demonstrated history in consumer goods, business development, investor relations, and industrial technologies, Melissa brings a unique combination of talents to the company. She developed and launched start-up companies in ecommerce, nutraceuticals, and the energy sector. In June 2019, Melissa was brought on by Gary C. Evans to help launch the Company, although her working tenure with Mr. Evans first began in 2013. In October 2019, she was brought on full-time as an officer of the Company.
From 2016 - 2019 in Los Angeles, Melissa helped develop, launch, and reorganize companies in ecommerce, nutraceuticals, and medical practices through her advising company Root LLC/Root Endeavor LLC. This included working with founders and teams on branding, marketing, product development, packaging, operations, staff reorganization, and optimizing efficiencies. In mid 2013 through 2015, Melissa began working under Gary C. Evans at Green Hunter Resources, Inc., a publicly traded company, where she started as Water Treatment Specialist/Account Executive, then moved into the position of Assistant Vice President, Investor Relations, and ultimately Vice President, Business Development, where she negotiated and secured multi-million-dollar contracts with large E&P companies for water treatment and handling, then oversaw those relationships. During her time in the energy sector, Melissa did several public speaking engagements for industry organizations, which helped earn her the honor of a WING Award (Women In Natural Gas) by Shale Media Group in 2014. Before beginning work with Mr. Evans, Melissa founded her own environmental remediation business in the Bakken Shale of North Dakota from 2012 - 2013. From 2010 - 2012, Melissa worked as Vice President, Marketing and Sales for Sionix Corporation, a publicly traded company in water treatment technology. Following the Tsunami in 2011, Melissa traveled to Japan to participate in discussions to address urgent water treatment issues and potential solutions in the wake of the Fukushima disaster. In 2001, Melissa began her career in the film industry, in development for Radar Pictures, Inc. (f/k/a Interscope Communications [Pictures]). She then worked with a female television Producer from 2004 - 2009. Working alongside creative executives and teams in the Film industry, she developed skills in writing, project management, and visual storytelling that would ultimately contribute to a number of future roles in helping companies develop branding, messaging, marketing, and investor relations. Melissa earned a Bachelor of Arts degree from University of California, Los Angeles where she graduated summa cum laude.
Jack Sibley, Vice President, Corporate Development of the Company, and Co-CEO of GENH Halcyon. Prior to joining the Company, Jack Sibley was a founding partner of OZ Capital, LLC, an Opportunity Zone Investment fund focused on operating businesses within Opportunity Zone designations. In his roll at OZ Capital, Jack oversaw the operations of its portfolio investments, including Halcyon Thruput, an industrial hemp processing company located in Hopkinsville, Kentucky. As an executive, Jack has worked alongside management teams to implement creative, innovative solutions to complex business issues, identify growth verticals and maximize stakeholder value. Prior to OZ Capital, Jack served as Vice President at Sovrano LLC, a Private Equity company focused in Food & Beverage. Jack also co-founded and served as President of Bamboo Juices, LLC in Atlanta, GA from 2014 - 2016. He received an MBA from The University of Georgia’s Terry College of Business in 2014 with concentrations in Finance and Marketing. Jack graduated with a BA in International Affairs from The University of Georgia in 2007.
Watt Stephens, Secretary of GENH Halcyon. Watt began his career as a credit analyst with Frost Bank in 2007, in this role he underwrote countless credit requests in various industries including commercial & industrial, energy and real estate. He then moved into a leadership position being tapped to run business development for a newly formed group focused on complex credit relationships. After almost 10 years at Frost Bank, Watt went back to school to earn his MBA and focus on his goal of launching his own business. In 2018, Watt teamed up with Jack Sibley to form OZ Capital LLC, an opportunity zone focused venture capital fund based in Fort Worth. OZ Capital founded and funded Halcyon Thruput in 2019. Watt and Jack stepped in as Co-CEO’s mid-way through 2020 and subsequently sold the business to the Company at the beginning of 2021. Watt earned his BS ’07 from SMU and MBA ’17 from SMU’s Cox School of Business.
Joe L. McClaugherty, Director. Mr. McClaugherty previously served as a director of Magnum Hunter Resources Corporation from 2006 through 2016 where he served as Lead Director during the last three years of his tenure. Mr. McClaugherty is a senior partner of McClaugherty & Silver, P.C., a full-service firm engaged in the practice of civil law, located in Santa Fe, New Mexico. He has practiced law for 40 years and has had a Martindale-Hubbell rating of AV Preeminent for over 20 years and is a Fellow of the International Academy of Trial Lawyers. Prior to founding McClaugherty& Silver, P.C. in 1992, he was the Managing Partner of the Santa Fe office of Kemp, Smith, Duncan & Hammond, and, earlier, of Rodey, Dickason, Sloan, Akin & Robb. Mr. McClaugherty has served on numerous boards of both international and domestic companies. He received a BBA with Honors from the University of Texas in 1973 and a JD with Honors from the University of Texas School of Law in 1976. He is admitted to the Bars of the State of New Mexico, Texas and Colorado, as well as the Federal Bars of the Districts of New Mexico and Colorado, the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals and the United States Supreme Court. The Company believes that it benefits from Mr. McClaugherty’s business and law degrees from the University of Texas at Austin, his approximately 40 years of legal experience in a broad-based civil practice and his extensive business experience on boards of both international and domestic companies.
Gary D. Elliston, Director. Mr. Elliston is the senior founding partner of DeHay & Elliston, L.L.P. where he specializes in the areas of toxic tort, commercial litigation, and professional and product liability litigation. He graduated cum laude from Howard Payne University in 1975, and as a Hatton W. Sumners Foundation Scholar, cum laude, from Southern Methodist University Law School in 1978. In 2007, he received an Honorary Doctorate of Humanities from Howard Payne University. He has served as a member of numerous professional, community and charitable organizations He is licensed to practice law in five states and actively tries cases around the US. He has been recognized multiple years as a Texas Super Lawyer and Best Lawyers in America.
John Harris, Director. Mr. Harris is currently a private investor in a cannabis growing operation based in southern California. Mr. Harris previously served as a member of the senior leadership team at EDS for approximately 25 years. He is also the former President and CEO of eTelecare Global Solutions; a $300M private equity backed business process outsourcing (“BPO”) company. Prior to eTelecare, Mr. Harris was President and CEO of Seven World Wide, a $400 million private equity backed Marketing Services BPO Company with operations in North America and the United Kingdom. Mr. Harris is a graduate of the University of West Georgia where he earned both a BBA and MBA. He currently serves on the Board of Advisors to the Richardson School of Business at the University of West Georgia. Mr. Harris has held board positions with a number of public and private telecommunications and technology services companies, and currently sits on the board of The Hackett Group. Mr. Harris’s experience as a senior executive and board member at a variety of global companies coupled with his recent experience as an investor in the cannabis space makes him an important asset as we grow and expand the Company’s business.
Involvement in Certain Legal Proceedings
In March 2016, during Mr. Evans’ tenure as interim CEO of GreenHunter Resources, Inc. that company and certain of its subsidiaries (namely, GreenHunter Water, LLC; Hunter Disposal, LLC; Ritchie Hunter Water Disposal, LLC; Hunter Hauling, LLC; White Top Oilfield Construction, LLC; Blackwater Services, LLC; Virco Realty, LLC; Little Muskingum Drilling, LLC; Blue Water Energy Solutions, LLC; GreenHunter Wheeling Barge, LLC; GreenHunter Environmental Solutions, LLC; and MAG Tank Hunter, LLC) filed for bankruptcy protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code. GreenHunter Resources, Inc. sought protection in large part because of the cyclical downturn in the commodity prices of both oil and natural gas which had a direct effect on all oil field service companies. GreenHunter Resources, Inc.’s assets were subsequently sold to a private equity group, which allowed predominately all secured indebtedness to be fully repaid.
In December 2015, during Mr. Evans’ tenure as CEO of Magnum Hunter Resources Corporation, that company filed for bankruptcy protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code in Delaware (In re Magnum Hunter Resources Corporation, et al., included the following debtors in addition to Magnum Hunter Resources Corporation, each of which was a directly or indirectly owned subsidiary of Magnum Hunter Resources Corporation: Alpha Hunter Drilling, LLC; Bakken Hunter Canada, Inc.; Bakken Hunter, LLC; Energy Hunter Securities, Inc.; Hunter Aviation, LLC; Hunter Real Estate, LLC; Magnum Hunter Marketing, LLC; Magnum Hunter Production, Inc.; Magnum Hunter Resources GP, LLC; Magnum Hunter Resources, LP; Magnum Hunter Services, LLC; NGAS Gathering, LLC; NGAS Hunter, LLC; PRC Williston LLC; Shale Hunter, LLC; Triad Holdings, LLC; Triad Hunter, LLC; Viking International Resources Co., Inc.; and Williston Hunter ND, LLC). This filing was due in large part to the precipitous commodity cycle downturn which saw the price of natural gas and crude oil reach lows not seen for over a decade. Magnum Hunter Resources Corporation subsequently emerged from bankruptcy with no indebtedness in May 2016 under Mr. Evans’ leadership. The company has since merged with Southwestern Energy Company (NYSE: SWN).
Board of Directors
Our board of directors currently consists of four members, including our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. In evaluating director candidates, we will assess whether a candidate possesses the integrity, judgment, knowledge, experience, skills and expertise that are likely to enhance the board of directors’ ability to manage and direct our affairs and business, including, when applicable, to enhance the ability of the committees of the board of directors to fulfill their duties. Our directors hold office until the earlier of their death, resignation, retirement, disqualification or removal or until their successors have been duly elected and qualified.
Independent Directors
Under NASDAQ Marketplace Rule 5605(a)(2), a director will not be considered an “independent director” if, such director at any time during the past three years was an employee of the Company, or if a director (or a director’s family member) accepted compensation from the Company (other than compensation for board or board committee service) in excess of $120,000 during any twelve-month period within the three years preceding the determination of independence. In addition, a director will not qualify as an “independent director” if, in the opinion of our Board of Directors, that person has a relationship that would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director. As of the Effective Date, each of Messrs. McClaugherty, Harris, and Elliston is an “independent director” within the meaning of Nasdaq Marketplace Rule 5605(a)(2). In addition, there are no family relationships among any of the directors or executive officers of the Company.
Committees of the Board of Directors
We have an audit committee, compensation committee and nominating and corporate governance committee of our board of directors and may have such other committees as the board of directors shall determine from time to time. Each of the standing committees of the board of directors has the composition and responsibilities described below.
Audit Committee
A minimum of two individuals serves as the members of our audit committee. As required by the rules of the Commission and listing standards of the NASDAQ, where we currently anticipate applying to have our Common Stock listed, the audit committee will consist solely of independent directors within one year of the listing date. Commission rules also require that a public company disclose whether or not its audit committee has an “audit committee financial expert” as a member. An “audit committee financial expert” is defined as a person who, based on his or her experience, possesses the attributes outlined in such rules. John Harris satisfies the definition of “audit committee financial expert”.
The audit committee oversees, reviews, acts on and reports on various auditing and accounting matters to our Board, including: the selection of our independent registered public accounting firm, the scope of our annual audits, fees to be paid to the independent registered public accounting firm, the performance of our independent registered public accounting firm and our accounting practices. In addition, the audit committee oversees our compliance programs relating to legal and regulatory requirements. We have adopted an audit committee charter defining the committee’s primary duties in a manner consistent with the rules of the Commission and the NASDAQ.
Compensation Committee
A minimum of three individuals serves as members of our compensation committee. Our compensation committee reviews and recommends policies relating to compensation and benefits of our directors and employees and is responsible for approving the compensation of our Chief Executive Officer and other executive officers. We have adopted a compensation committee charter defining the committee’s primary duties in a manner consistent with the rules of the Commission and NASDAQ.
Nominating and Corporate Governance
A minimum of three individuals serves as members of our nominating and corporate governance committee. Our nominating and corporate governance committee selects or recommends that the Board select candidates for election to our Board, develops and recommends to the Board corporate governance guidelines that will be applicable to us and oversee board of director and management evaluations. We have adopted a nominating and corporate governance committee charter defining the committee’s primary duties in a manner consistent with the rules of the Commission and NASDAQ.
Code of Business Conduct and Ethics
Our Board adopted a code of business conduct and ethics applicable to our employees, directors and officers, in accordance with applicable U.S. federal securities laws and the corporate governance rules of the NASDAQ. Any waiver of this code may be made only by our Board and will be promptly disclosed as required by applicable U.S. federal securities laws and the corporate governance rules of the NASDAQ. Copies of the Code of Conduct and Financial Code of Ethics are available on our website at https://www.genhempinc.com/ under “Investors.” Information on our website is not incorporated by reference into this annual report or any other filing we file with or furnish to the SEC. Shareholders may also obtain electronic or printed copies by sending a written request to 8533 Midway Road, Dallas, Texas 75209 or by emailing gevans@genhempinc.com,
Lead Independent Director
If at any time, the offices of Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer are held by the same person, we intend that the independent members of the Board will elect on an annual basis with a majority vote an independent director to serve in a lead capacity (the “Lead Independent Director”). The Lead Independent Director coordinates the activities of the other independent directors and perform such other duties and responsibilities as the Board may determine. The Board has adopted a Lead Independent Director Charter defining the Lead Independent Director’s primary duties in a manner consistent with the rules of the Commission and NASDAQ. The Board has selected Mr. McClaugherty to serve as Lead Independent Director.
Corporate Governance Guidelines
After the Effective Date, we anticipate that the Board will adopt corporate governance guidelines in accordance with the corporate governance rules of the NASDAQ.

---

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Item 11. Executive Compensation
Narrative Disclosures
Employment, Severance or Change in Control Agreements. We currently do not maintain any employment, severance or change in control agreements with our named executive officers. In addition, our named executive officers are not entitled to any payments or other benefits in connection with a termination of employment or a change in control.
Retirement Benefits. We have not maintained, and do not currently intend to maintain, a defined benefit pension plan or nonqualified deferred compensation plan.
Compensation of Named Executive Officers
The following table contains compensation data for our named executive officers for the fiscal years ending December 31, 2022 and 2021:
Name and Principal Position Fiscal
Year Salary Bonus Stock
Awards Option
Awards Total
Received(1)
Gary C. Evans $ 401,294 610,000 - $ 6,079,586 $ 7,090,880
Chief Executive Officer 400,000 - - 141,659 541,659
Melissa M. Pagen $ 117,000 - - $ 759,948 $ 876,948
Managing Director, Chief Branding Officer, Corporate Secretary 180,000 - - - 180,000
Jack Sibley(2) $ 164,904 - 77,500 $ 569,961 $ 812,365
Vice President, Corporate Development of the Company, and Co-CEO of GENH Halcyon 175,000 - - - 175,000
Watt Stephens(2) $ 164,904 - 77,500 $ 569,961 $ 812,365
Managing Director, Vice President, Corporate Development of the Company and Secretary of GENH Halcyon 175,000 - - - 175,000
(1) Amount reflects total compensation received for calendar year.
(2) Mr. Sibley and Mr. Watt joined the Company on January 11, 2021. Each receive a base annual salary of $175,000.
Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End
The following table provides information relating to the unexercised stock options and the unvested stock awards for the Named Executive Officers as of December 31, 2022:
Stock Option Awards Restricted Stock Awards
Number of Securities Underlying
Shares of Restricted
Stock
Unexercised Options Option Option That Have Not Vested
Name Exercisable Unvested Exercise
Price Expiration
Date Number Market
Value
Gary C. Evans 5,333,334 2,666,666 $ 0.76 10/29/2031 - $ -
- 475,000 $ 0.33 08/15/2027 - $ -
Melissa M. Pagen 666,667 333,333 $ 0.76 10/29/2031 - $ -
Jack Sibley 500,000 250,000 $ 0.76 10/29/2031 - $ -
Watt Stephens 500,000 250,000 $ 0.76 10/29/2031 - $ -
Compensation of Directors
Attracting and retaining qualified non-employee directors is critical to the future value growth and governance of our Company. A significant portion of the total compensation package for our non-employee directors is equity-based to align the interest of these directors with our stockholders.
Directors who are also our employees will not receive any additional compensation for their service on our Board.
Directors are reimbursed for (i) travel and miscellaneous expenses to attend meetings and activities of our Board or its committees; and (ii) travel and miscellaneous expenses related to such director’s participation in general education and orientation programs for directors.
The following table summarizes the compensation awarded or paid to the members of the board of directors, who were compensated for board service beginning with their election to the board of directors in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022:
Nature of Director Fees
Director Name Director Committee Option
Awards (1) Total
Joe McClaugherty $ - $ - $ 36,216 $ 36,216
Gary D. Elliston - - 36,216 36,216
John Harris - - 36,216 36,216
Gary C. Evans - - - -
All directors as a group $ - $ - $ 108,648 $ 108,648
(1) Each of the directors were granted options for the purchase of 120,000 shares of the Company’s common stock in 2022. The awarded options vested vest in three equal annual tranches over three years from issuance. Vested options may be exercised at any time until their expiration after 10 years at an exercise price of $0.30 per share.
The table above does not include the amount of any expense reimbursements paid to the above directors. Mr. Evans does not receive any additional compensation for serving on the Board of Directors other than the compensation described in the Summary Executive Compensation Table, above.

---

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
The following table sets forth information regarding beneficial ownership of our Common Stock, as of February 28, 2022. We have determined beneficial ownership in accordance with Commission rules. The information does not necessarily indicate beneficial ownership for any other purpose.
Except as indicated in the footnotes to the following table, the persons named in the table has sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of common stock and preferred stock beneficially owned. Except as otherwise indicated, the address of each of the stockholders listed below is: C/O Evergreen Sustainable Enterprises, Inc., 8533 Midway Road, Dallas, Texas 75209.
Name of Beneficial Owner Amount and
Nature of
Ownership
(1) Percent of
Voting
Securities
(2)
5% Stockholders:
Satellite Overseas (Holdings) Limited(3) 26,263,144 23.2 %
Corey Wiegard 6,254,843 5.5 %
OZG Agriculture KY, LP 6,250,000 5.5 %
Directors and Named Executive Officers:
Gary C. Evans(4) 38,014,242 33.6 %
Melissa Pagen - - %
Jack Sibley(5) 6,500,000 5.7 %
Watt Stephens(5) 6,500,000 5.7 %
Gary Elliston 4,090,909 3.6 %
John Harris 284,090 0.3 %
Joe McClaugherty 2,027,210 1.8 %
All officers and directors as a group 51,166,451 45.2 %
(1) Beneficial Ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission and generally includes voting or investment power with respect to securities. Each of the beneficial owners listed above has direct ownership of and sole voting power and investment power to the shares of the common stock. For each Beneficial Owner listed, any options or convertible securities exercisable or convertible within 60 days have been also included for purposes of calculating their beneficial ownership of outstanding common stock.
(2) Ownership percentage based on 113,204,002 fully diluted shares of common stock outstanding as calculated on an as-converted basis.
(3) Satellite Overseas (Holdings) Limited (“SOHL”) is the record holder of these shares of Common Stock. SOHL is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Cadila Pharmaceuticals Ltd. (“Cadila”). Cadila is owned by the IRM Trust. Rajiv I. Modi, Ph. D. and Mrs. Shilaben I. Modi are the trustees of the IRM Trust. As trustees of the IRM Trust, Dr. Modi and Mrs. Modi have shared voting and dispositive power with respect to these shares and, therefore, under rules issued by the Commission may be deemed to be beneficial owners of the shares.
(4) Includes 1,061,970 shares of common stock owned by Investment Hunter, LLC, a Texas LLC controlled by Gary C. Evans.
(5) Because of the relationship of Messrs. Sibley and Stephens to OZG Agriculture KY, LP, Messrs. Sibley and Stephens may be deemed indirect beneficial owners of the 6,250,000 shares of common stock owned by OZG Agriculture KY, LP.

---

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Persons Transactions
Board Role in Risk Oversight
Our Board of Directors is responsible for the oversight of the Company’s risk management efforts. Members of management are responsible for particular areas of risk for the company and provide presentations, information and updates on risk management efforts as requested by our Board.
Family Relationships
There are no family relationships among our executive officers and directors.
Related Transactions
2021 Issuances of Common Stock Units - In the first quarter of 2021, the Company issued 800,000 common stock units for total proceeds of $400,000. Each common stock unit consists of one share of common stock and a warrant for the purchase of two shares of common stock for $0.50 each. Each warrant is exercisable any time before its expiration on the second anniversary of its issuance. Mr. Evans purchased 100,000 commons stock units in this issuance.
Subordinated Promissory Note to Gary C. Evans - Gary C. Evans made advances of $490,000 to the Company during 2020 under a subordinated promissory note initially due September 30, 2021. This note was amended to a new maturity date of June 30, 2022. If the Company raises new equity capital of $3 million or more, then the full amount outstanding under the note is due within five days. The note bears interest at 10% per annum. The outstanding amount of this this subordinated promissory note was $523,551 and accrued interest totaled $7,602 at December 31, 2021.
Convertible Promissory Note to Gary C. Evans - In 2021, Gary C. Evans made advances totaling $410,000 to the Company under a convertible promissory note. The convertible note matured on January 1, 2022 but was subsequently amended to extend the maturity date to June 30, 2022. If the Company raises new equity capital of $3 million or more, then the full amount outstanding under the note is due within five days. The note bears interest at 10%. The principal and interest due on the convertible note may be converted, at the option of the holder, into restricted shares of the Company’s common stock at a conversion price equal to $0.50 per share. Accrued interest on this convertible promissory note totaled $19,118 at December 31, 2021.
Advances under Promissory Note - In the first quarter of 2022, Investment Hunter, LLC, a Texas LLC controlled by Gary C. Evans, made advances totaling $439,000 to the Company under a promissory note due June 30, 2022. If the Company raises new equity capital of $3 million or more, then the full amount outstanding under the note is due within five days. The note bears interest at 10% per annum.
December 2020 Issuance of Series B Preferred Stock Units - On December 30, 2020, the Company sold to certain accredited investors, including Gary C. Evans (50 shares), CEO and chairman, and Gary Elliston (25 shares), one of our incoming directors, an aggregate of 135 preferred stock units comprised of (i) one share of Series B Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock, no par value, and (ii) one warrant exercisable for 50,000 shares of common stock of the Company. On March 9, 2021, Mr. Elliston exercised cash warrants received by him in the Series B Preferred Stock Unit issuance for 1,250,000 shares of common stock.
Gary C. Evans Convertible Note with EHR. In October and December of 2019, Mr. Evans advanced EHR $370,770 under a convertible note bearing interest at 10% per annum. This note, including accrued interest, was converted into 1,061,970 shares of common stock on December 31, 2019.
EHR Series C Preferred Stock - In the third quarter of 2019, EHR raised $850,000 of additional funding through the issuance of 34,000 shares of EHR Series C Preferred Stock. The EHR Series C Preferred Stock converted into 2,414,773 shares of EHR’s common stock upon completion of the Transaction. These common shares were initially accounted for as non-controlling interests in EHR. In an exchange transaction effective November 27, 2019, the Company acquired these non-controlling interests representing approximately 26% of the ownership of EHR through the issuance of 2,414,773 shares of Company common stock and 14,488,638 warrants for the purchase of Company common stock. The warrants have an exercise price of $0.352 per share and expire on November 27, 2021. The warrants may be redeemed beginning October 1, 2020 for $0.0001 per warrant at the Company’s option with 30-days advanced notice should the volume weighted average price exceed $1.00 for any five out of seven consecutive trading days with a minimum average daily trading volume for such seven-day period of at least 25,000 shares of common stock. One-half of the warrants have a cashless exercise feature.
In connection with the exchange transaction, on November 27, 2019, John Harris obtained beneficial ownership of 71,022 shares of common stock, 213,068 cash warrants, and 213,068 cashless warrants. On February 26, 2021, the cash warrants were exercised for the purchase of 213,068 shares of common stock. Also, at the time of the exchange, Gary Elliston received 710,227 shares of common stock, 2,130,682 cash warrants, and 2,130,682 cashless warrants. On March 9, 2021, Mr. Elliston exercised all of his cash warrants and received 2,130,682 shares of common stock. Lastly, at the time of the exchange, Joe McClaugherty received 71,022 shares of common stock, 213,068 cash warrants, and 213,068 cashless warrants. On November 23, 2021, Mr. McClaugherty exercised all of his cash warrants and received 213,068 shares of common stock.
Warrant Exercises - In the fourth quarter of 2021, the Company received $375,000 for the exercise of 1,065,340 outstanding warrants. Mr. Evans exercised warrants that he had acquired from an unrelated stockholder. Mr. Evans received 852,272 shares of the Company’s common stock for total proceeds of $300,000.
Option Grants - In the fourth quarter of 2021, the Company awarded options for 13,850,000 shares of the Company’s common stock as incentive compensation. One-third of the awarded options vested immediately with the remaining options vesting in two equal tranches over the next two years. Vested options may be exercised at any time until their expiration after 10 years. Unvested shares are forfeited upon termination of employment. Mr. Evans received options for 8,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock in this issuance. Messrs. McClaugherty, Elliston and Harris each received options for 500,000 of the Company’s common stock in this issuance.
Other Related Party Transactions
Please see Note 5 to our audited consolidated financial statements contained in Item 8 of Part II of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for a description of certain other transactions with related parties, which descriptions are incorporated by reference herein.
Director Independence
See Item 10. “Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance” for information regarding our directors and independence requirements applicable for the Board of Directors and its committees.

---

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES
Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services
Our independent public accounting firm is Marcum LLP, Houston, Texas, PCAOB Auditor ID 688.
The following table sets forth the fees paid by us for the audit and other services provided by our auditor, Marcum, LLC during the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021:
Audit fees (1) $ 239,763 $ 283,050
Audit related fees - -
Tax fees - -
All other fees - -
Total fees $ 239,763 $ 283,050
(1) Audit Fees: This category represents the aggregate fees billed for professional services rendered by the principal independent accountant for the audit of our annual financial statements and review of financial statements included in our Form 10-K and services that are normally provided by the accountant in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements for the fiscal years.
Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures
The audit committee charter of our board of directors requires the audit committee to pre-approve all audit services and permitted non-audit services (other than de minimis non-audit services as defined by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002) to be provided by our independent registered public accounting firm. The Audit Committee may form and delegate authority to subcommittees consisting of one or more members when appropriate, including the authority to grant preapprovals of audit and permitted non-audit services, provided that decisions of such subcommittee to grant preapprovals shall be presented to the full Audit Committee at its next scheduled meeting for ratification.

---

ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
(a) The following documents are filed as part of this Report:
(1) Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (PCAOB ID Number 688)
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2022 and 2021
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2022 and 2021
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit) for the Years Ended December 31, 2022 and 2021
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2022 and 2021
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(2) Supplemental Oil and Gas Information (Unaudited)
(b) Exhibits:
Exhibit Number
Description
3.1
Certificate of Incorporation (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021 filed on April 12, 2022 (file number 333-176154))
3.2
Bylaws (filed as Exhibit 3.2 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021 filed on April 12, 2022 (file number 333-176154))
3.3
Certificate of Designation of Rights, Preferences and Limitations of the Series A Convertible Voting Preferred Stock (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 4, 2019 (file number 000-176154))
3.4
Certificate of Designation of Rights, Preferences and Limitations of the Series B Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 6, 2021 (file number 000-55019))
3.5**
Certificate of Designation of Rights, Preferences and Limitations of the Series C Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock
4.1
2020 Form of Generation Hemp Warrant (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019 filed on December 15, 2020 (file number 333-176154))
4.2
Form of Warrant (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 6, 2021 (file number 000-55019))
4.4
Description of Securities (filed as Exhibit 4.4 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021 filed on April 12, 2022 (file number 333-176154))
4.5**
Form of Warrant (2023)
10.1
Deed of Trust, dated September 15, 2014, between JDONE LLC and Thomas S. Yang. (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 19, 2014 (file number 333-176154))
10.2
Promissory Note, dated September 15, 2014, made by JDONE LLC in favor Thomas S. Yang. (filed as Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 19, 2014 (file number 333-176154))
10.3
Amendment No. 1 to Promissory Note and Deed of Trust, dated October 1, 2019, between JDONE LLC, Thomas S. Yang, and Gary C. Evans (filed as Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019 filed on December 15, 2020 (file number 333-176154))
10.4
Amendment and Extension Agreement to Promissory Note and Deed of Trust, dated October 1, 2019, between JDONE LLC, Thomas S. Yang, and Gary C. Evan (filed as Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021 filed on April 12, 2022 (file number 333-176154))
10.5
Amendment and Extension Agreement, dated April 20, 2022, to Promissory Note and Deed of Trust between JDONE LLC, Thomas S. Yang, and Gary C. Evans (filed as Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2022 filed on May 23, 2022 (file number 333-176154))
10.6
Amendment and Extension Agreement, dated July 18, 2022, to Promissory Note and Deed of Trust between JDONE LLC, Thomas S. Yang, and Gary C. Evans (filed as Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2022 filed on August 19, 2022 (file number 333-176154))
10.7
Secured Promissory Note Amendment and Extension Agreement, dated October 10, 2022, between JDONE LLC, Thomas S. Yang, and Gary C. Evans (filed as Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2022 filed on November 14, 2022 (file number 333-176154))
10.8
Biomass Tolling Agreement, dated July 11, 2021, but effective as of June 30, 2021 (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 12, 2021 (file number 000-55019))
10.9
Toll Processing Agreement, dated June 8, 2021, between GenH Halcyon Acquisition and Bragg Canna, LLC (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2021 filed on August 13, 2021 (file number 000-55019))
10.10
Biomass Services Agreement, dated August 11, 2021, between GenH Halcyon Acquisition and Kushco Holdings, Inc (filed as Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2021 filed on August 13, 2021 (file number 000-55019))
10.11
Merchandise License Agreement dated February 17, 2022 between Gas Monkey Holdings, LLC and Generation Hemp, Inc (filed as Exhibit 10.8 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021 filed on April 12, 2022 (file number 333-176154))
10.12
2020 Form of Common Stock and Warrant Subscription Agreement of Generation Hemp, Inc. (filed as Exhibit 10.10 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019 filed on December 15, 2020 (file number 333-176154))
10.13
Subordinated Promissory Note, dated September 30, 2020, made by Generation Hemp, Inc. in favor of Gary C. Evans (filed as Exhibit 10.11 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019 filed on December 15, 2020 (file number 333-176154))
10.14
Amended and Restated Subordinated Promissory Note, dated November 11, 2021, with Gary C. Evans as holder (filed as Exhibit 10.8 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2021 filed on November 15, 2021 (file number 000-55019))
10.15
Amended and Restated Subordinated Promissory Note, dated January 1, 2022, with Gary C. Evans as holder (filed as Exhibit 10.14 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021 filed on April 12, 2022 (file number 333-176154))
10.16
Amended and Restated Subordinated Promissory Note, by Generation Hemp, Inc. with Gary C. Evans as holder, dated July 1, 2022 (filed as Exhibit 10.5 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2022 filed on August 19, 2022 (file number 333-176154))
10.18
Amended and Restated Subordinated Promissory Note, by Generation Hemp, Inc. with Gary C. Evans as holder, dated July 1, 2022 (filed as Exhibit 10.5 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2022 filed on August 19, 2022 (file number 333-176154))
10.19
First Amendment to Purchase Agreement, dated March 7, 2020, by and among, Generation Hemp, Inc., GENH Halcyon Acquisition, LLC, Oz Capital, LLC, OZC Agriculture KY LP, Halcyon Thruput, LLC, and the owners set forth therein (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 15, 2021 (file number 000-55019))
10.20
Asset Purchase Agreement, dated March 7, 2020, by and among, Generation Hemp, Inc., GENH Halcyon Acquisition, LLC, Oz Capital, LLC, OZC Agriculture KY LP, Halcyon Thruput, LLC, and the owners set forth therein (filed as Exhibit 10.12 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019 filed on December 15, 2020 (file number 333-176154))
10.21
Subscription Agreement (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 6, 2021 (file number 000-55019))
10.22
Guaranty Agreement by Generation Hemp, Inc. in favor of Coventry Asset Management (filed as Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 15, 2021 (file number 000-55019))
10.23
Letter Agreement, dated November 11, 2021, with Coventry Asset Management, LTD (filed as Exhibit 10.7 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2021 filed on November 15, 2021 (file number 000-55019))
10.24
Letter Agreement, dated March 7, 2022, with Coventry Asset Management, LTD (filed as Exhibit 10.23 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021 filed on April 12, 2022 (file number 333-176154))
10.25
Letter Agreement, dated May 11, 2022, with Coventry Asset Management, LTD (filed as Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2022 filed on May 23, 2022 (file number 333-176154))
10.26
Letter Agreement, dated July 31, 2022, with Coventry Asset Management, LTD (filed as Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2022 filed on August 19, 2022 (file number 333-176154))
10.27
Unsecured Promissory Note, dated August 11, 2021, with Gary C. Evans as holder (filed as Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2021 filed on August 13, 2021 (file number 000-55019))
10.28
Amended and Restated Promissory Note, by Generation Hemp, Inc., dated August 30, 2021, with Gary C. Evans as holder (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 30, 2021 (file number 000-55019))
10.29
Amended and Restated Promissory Note, by Generation Hemp, Inc., dated September 9, 2021, with Gary C. Evans as holder (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 10, 2021 (file number 000-55019))
10.30
Amended and Restated Promissory Note, by Generation Hemp, Inc., dated September 28, 2021, with Gary C. Evans as holder (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 29, 2021 (file number 000-55019))
10.31
Amended and Restated Promissory Note, by Generation Hemp, Inc., dated November 11, 2021, with Gary C. Evans as holder (filed as Exhibit 10.9 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2021 filed on November 15, 2021 (file number 000-55019))
10.32
Amended and Restated Promissory Note, by Generation Hemp, Inc., dated January 1, 2022, with Gary C. Evans as holder (filed as Exhibit 10.29 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021 filed on April 12, 2022 (file number 333-176154))
10.33
Amended and Restated Promissory Note, by Generation Hemp, Inc., dated May 19, 2022, with Gary C. Evans as holder (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2022 filed on May 23, 2022 (file number 333-176154))
10.34
Amended and Restated Promissory Note by Generation Hemp, Inc. with Gary C. Evans as holder, dated July 1, 2022 (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2022 filed on August 19, 2022 (file number 333-176154))
10.35
Amended and Restated Convertible Promissory Note by Generation Hemp, Inc. with Gary C. Evans as holder, dated September 30, 2022 (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2022 filed on November 14, 2022 (file number 333-176154))
10.36
Unsecured Promissory Note, dated March 18, 2022, with Investment Hunter, LLC as holder (filed as Exhibit 10.32 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021 filed on April 12, 2022 (file number 333-176154))
10.37
Amended and Restated Unsecured Promissory Note, dated May 19, 2022, with Investment Hunter, LLC as holder (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2022 filed on May 23, 2022 (file number 333-176154))
10.38
Revised and Extended Unsecured Promissory Note with Investment Hunter, LLC as holder, dated July 1, 2022 (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2022 filed on August 19, 2022 (file number 333-176154))
10.39
Revised and Extended Unsecured Promissory Note, dated September 30, 2022, with Investment Hunter, LLC as holder, dated September 30, 2022 (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2022 filed on November 14, 2022 (file number 333-176154))
10.40#
Term Employment Agreement with Jack Sibley (filed as Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 15, 2021 (file number 000-55019))
10.41#
Term Employment Agreement with Watt Stephens (filed as Exhibit 10.5 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 15, 2021 (file number 000-55019))
10.42
Note Contribution Agreement, dated March 9, 2021, among Energy Hunter Resources, Inc., Satellite Overseas (Holdings) Limited, and Generation Hemp, Inc. (filed as Exhibit 10.21 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on March 31, 2021 (file number 000-55019))
10.43
2021 Form of Common Stock and Warrant Subscription Agreement of Generation Hemp, Inc. (filed as Exhibit 10.22 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on March 31, 2021 (file number 000-55019))
10.44#
Form of Incentive Stock Option Agreement under 2021 Omnibus Incentive Plan (filed as Exhibit 10.37 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021 filed on April 12, 2022 (file number 333-176154))
10.45#
Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement under 2021 Omnibus Incentive Plan (filed as Exhibit 10.38 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021 filed on April 12, 2022 (file number 333-176154))
10.46#
Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement under 2021 Omnibus Incentive Plan (filed as Exhibit 10.39 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021 filed on April 12, 2022 (file number 333-176154))
10.47#
Form of Restricted Stock Units Award Agreement under 2021 Omnibus Incentive Plan (filed as Exhibit 10.40 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021 filed on April 12, 2022 (file number 333-176154))
10.48#
Form of Stock Appreciation Right Grant Agreement under 2021 Omnibus Incentive Plan (filed as Exhibit 10.41 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021 filed on April 12, 2022 (file number 333-176154))
10.49**
Form of Subscription Agreement for Series C Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock
10.50**
Letter Agreement, dated April 27, 2023, with Coventry Asset Management, LTD
10.51**
Secured Promissory Note, dated April 19, 2023, made by Razorback I, LLC, in favor of Michael A. McManus and Gary C. Evans
10.52**
Guaranty Agreement by Evergreen Sustainable Enterprises, Inc. in favor of in favor of Michael A. McManus and Gary C. Evans
21**
List of Subsidiaries of the Company
31.1**
Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302
32.1**
Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2004
101.INS
Inline XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH
Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CAL
Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
101.DEF
Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
101.LAB
Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
101.PRE
Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
Cover Page Interactive Data File (formatted as Inline XBRL and contained in Exhibit 101)
** Exhibit filed herewith
# Constitutes a management compensatory plan or arrangement.