Question: Are Curtis Publishing Co. v. Butts and Ware v. Hylton both cases involving the Bill of Rights?

Context articles: Stephen Babcock (lawyer)
Laughing Whitefish
The Britons
American Civil Rights Union
East Center City Commercial Historic District
Superior court
Clerke v. Harwood
Ware v. Hylton
Curtis Publishing Co. v. Butts
Justice of the Common Pleas

Stephen Babcock is a Baton Rouge, Louisiana-based trial lawyer.
 He is the founding partner of Babcock Partners in Baton Rouge, Louisiana which specializes in cases involving personal injury, wrongful death, select criminal and commercial litigation.
 He is best known for his high-profile cases involving large business disputes and catastrophic personal injury matters.
Laughing Whitefish is a 1965 historical novel by Justice John D. Voelker, writing under the pen name "Robert Traver".
 It is based on an actual trilogy of Michigan Supreme Court cases from the 1880s.
 The final case in the series, "Kobogum v. Jackson Iron Co.", established in Michigan the general rule that state courts must defer to tribal law in cases involving the internal, domestic relations of American Indians residing within their own territory.
The Britons was an English anti-Semitic and anti-immigration organisation founded in July 1919 by Henry Hamilton Beamish.
 The organisation published pamphlets and propaganda under the imprint names of the Judaic Publishing Co., and subsequently the Britons Publishing Society.
 These entities engaged primarily in disseminating anti-Semitic literature and rhetoric in the United Kingdom, and bore hallmarks of the British fascist movement.
 Imprints under the label of the "Judaic Publishing Co." exist for the years 1920, 1921, and 1922.
The American Civil Rights Union (ACRU) is an American legal organization founded by former Reagan Administration official Robert B. Carleson in 1998.
 It has been described by Human Events as a conservative alternative to the ACLU.
 The ACRU has filed numerous amicus briefs in court cases involving election law and voting rights, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (Obamacare), gun ownership and property rights cases, and cases involving the Boy Scouts of America including the 2000 U.S. Supreme Court case of "Boy Scouts of America v. Dale", defending the Boy Scouts' freedom of association right to create their own criteria for leaders and members.
East Center City Commercial Historic District is a national historic district located in the Washington Square neighborhood of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
 It encompasses 287 contributing buildings that includes a mix of large and small commercial buildings, banks, hotels, newspapers, clubs, and restaurants.
 Notable buildings include the Curtis Publishing Co. (1907), Lits Department Store (1891), Strawbridge and Clothier (1868), Gimbels (1894), Benjamin Franklin Hotel (1922), New York Mutual Life Insurance Company Building (1872, 1890), Aldelphia Hotel (1912), Blum Store (1927), Keystone National Bank (1884), Beck Engraving and "The Press" (1896), Integrity Trust (1923), Quaker City Bank (1892), Philadelphia Club, the Old Federal Reserve Bank (1932), U.S. Post Office and Courthouse, Walnut Street Theatre, and Forrest Theater.
 It also includes a set of 3 1/2-story townhouses designed by Benjamin Henry Latrobe for William Sansom.
In common law systems, a superior court is a court of general competence which typically has unlimited jurisdiction with regard to civil and criminal legal cases.
 A superior court is "superior" relative to a court with limited jurisdiction (see lower court), which is restricted to civil cases involving monetary amounts with a specific limit, or criminal cases involving offenses of a less serious nature.
 A superior court may hear appeals from lower courts (see court of appeal).
Clerke v. Harwood, 3 U.S. 342 (1797) , was a United States Supreme Court case that followed the court's decision in Ware v. Hylton, concerning debts owed to British subjects.
 In the Ware case, the Supreme Court had reversed a decision by the Maryland Court of Appeals, the state's highest court, and restored the decision of a Maryland trial court.
Ware v. Hylton, 3 U.S. (3 Dall.)
 199 (1796) is a United States Supreme Court case where a divided court ruled that an article in the Treaty of Paris, which provided that creditors on both sides should meet "no lawful impediment" when recovering "bona fide" debts, took precedence and overruled a Virginia law passed during the American Revolution which had nullified such debts.
 The full title of the case is Ware, administrator of Jones, Plaintiff in Error v. Hylton et al. It is also known as the British Debt case.
Curtis Publishing Co. v. Butts, 388 U.S. 130 (1967), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States established the standard of First Amendment protection against defamation claims brought by private individuals.
Justice of the Common Pleas was a puisne judicial position within the Court of Common Pleas of England and Wales, under the Chief Justice.
 The Common Pleas was the primary court of common law within England and Wales, dealing with "common" pleas (civil matters between subject and subject).
 It was created out of the common law jurisdiction of the Exchequer of Pleas, with splits forming during the 1190s and the division becoming formal by the beginning of the 13th century.
 The court became a key part of the Westminster courts, along with the Exchequer of Pleas (qualified to hear cases involving revenue owed to the King) and the Court of King's Bench (authorised to hear cases involving the King), but with the Writ of Quominus and the Statute of Westminster, both tried to extend their jurisdiction into the realm of common pleas.
 As a result, the courts jockeyed for power.
 In 1828 Henry Brougham, a Member of Parliament, complained in Parliament that as long as there were three courts unevenness was inevitable, saying that "It is not in the power of the courts, even if all were monopolies and other restrictions done away, to distribute business equally, as long as suitors are left free to choose their own tribunal", and that there would always be a favourite court, which would therefore attract the best lawyers and judges and entrench its position.
 The outcome was the Supreme Court of Judicature Act 1873, under which all the central courts were made part of a single Supreme Court of Judicature.
 Eventually the government created a High Court of Justice under Lord Coleridge by an Order in Council of 16 December 1880.
 At this point, the Common Pleas formally ceased to exist.