Question: Which case was discussed first in court Diamond v. Chakrabarty or Williams v. Lee ?

Context articles: Data Recall Diamond
Williams v. Mississippi
Hedgepeth and Williams v. Board of Education
Diamond v. Charles
Diamond v. Chakrabarty
Williams v. Pennsylvania
Williams v. Florida
Ananda Mohan Chakrabarty
Williams v. North Carolina (1942)
Williams v. Lee

The Data Recall Diamond One was a word processing typewriter, designed and built by Data Recall Ltd at Dorking, Surrey, England in the late 1970s and early 1980s.
 The machine drove a Qume daisy wheel printer via a serial interface at 35–55 characters per second, and used an 8-inch floppy disc drive capable of holding 250,000 characters.
 It was user programmable.
 Later models included the Diamond III, the Diamond Five (a.k.a. Diamond V), and the Diamond 7.
Williams v. Mississippi, 170 U.S. 213 (1898) is a United States Supreme Court case that reviewed provisions of the state constitution that set requirements for voter registration.
 The Supreme Court did not find discrimination in the state's requirements for voters to pass a literacy test and pay poll taxes, as these were applied to all voters.
Hedgepeth and Williams v. Board of Education, Trenton, NJ, also known as the Hedgepeth–Williams case, was a 1944 New Jersey Supreme Court decision in a legal action brought by two mothers, Gladys Hedgepeth and Berline Williams, who sued the Trenton, New Jersey, Board of Education over racial discrimination against their children, Leon Williams and Janet Hedgepeth.
 It was a precursor to the "Brown v. Board of Education" case that prohibited racial segregation of school systems throughout the United States.
Diamond v. Charles, 476 U.S. 54 (1986) , was a United States Supreme Court case that determined that citizens do not have Article III standing to challenge the constitutionality of a state statute in federal court unless they possess a "direct stake" in the outcome.
Diamond v. Chakrabarty, 447 U.S. 303 (1980), was a United States Supreme Court case dealing with whether genetically modified organisms can be patented.
Williams v. Pennsylvania, 579 U.S. ___ (2016) , was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a prosecutor involved in seeking the death penalty for a defendant should recuse himself if asked to judge an appeal in the capital case.
Williams v. Florida, 399 U.S. 78 (1970), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the Fifth Amendment does not entitle a defendant in a criminal trial to refuse to provide details of his alibi witnesses to the prosecution, and that the Sixth Amendment does not require a jury to have 12 members.
Ananda Mohan Chakrabarty (Bengali: আনন্দমোহন চক্রবর্তী "Ānandamōhan Cakrabartī"), Ph.D. is an Bengali American microbiologist, scientist, and researcher, most notable for his work in directed evolution and his role in developing a genetically engineered organism using plasmid transfer while working at GE, the patent for which led to landmark Supreme Court case, "Diamond v. Chakrabarty".
Williams v. North Carolina, 317 U.S. 287 (1942), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the federal government determines marriage and divorce statuses between state lines.
 Mr. Williams and Ms. Hendrix moved to Nevada and filed for divorce from their respective spouses.
 Once the divorces were final Mr. Williams and Ms. Hendrix were married and then moved back to North Carolina.
 They lived there together until they were charged by the state of North Carolina for bigamous cohabitation.
Williams v. Lee, 358 U.S. 217 (1959), was a landmark case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that the State of Arizona does not have jurisdiction to try a civil case between a non-Indian doing business on a reservation with tribal members who reside on the reservation, the proper forum for such cases being the tribal court.