Question: Which Supreme Court decision, decided on the same day as Doe v. Bolton, tied state regulation of abortion to the third trimester of pregnancy?

Context articles: Bush v. Palm Beach County Canvassing Board
Roe v. Wade
V.L. v. E.L.
Planned Parenthood v. Casey
Margie Pitts Hames
Review of court decision in Indonesia
Therapeutic Abortion Committee
Catholic Church and abortion politics
Joseph Scheidler
Doe v. Bolton

Bush v. Palm Beach County Canvassing Board, 531 U.S. 70 (2000), was a United States Supreme Court decision involving Florida voters during the 2000 presidential election.
 In this case, the U.S. Supreme Court requested clarification from the Florida Supreme Court regarding a decision it had made.
 Shortly after the Florida Supreme Court provided those clarifications, the U.S. Supreme Court resolved the election in favor of George W. Bush over Al Gore in the case of "Bush v. Gore".
Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973) , is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court on the issue of abortion.
 It was decided simultaneously with a companion case, "Doe v. Bolton".
 The Court ruled 7–2 that a right to privacy under the Due Process Clause of the 14th Amendment extended to a woman's decision to have an abortion, but that this right must be balanced against the state's interests in regulating abortions: protecting women's health and protecting the potentiality of human life.
 Arguing that these state interests became stronger over the course of a pregnancy, the Court resolved this balancing test by tying state regulation of abortion to the third trimester of pregnancy.
V.L. v. E.L., 577 U.S. ___ (2016) , is a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States concerning the adoption rights of same-sex couples.
 In 2007, a Georgia Superior Court granted adoption rights to V.L., the partner of E.L., the woman who gave birth to their three children.
 However, after moving back to Alabama, the couple split up.
 E.L. tried to block V.L. from seeing the children, but V.L. filed a lawsuit seeking visitation and other parental rights.
 On September 18, 2015, the Supreme Court of Alabama ruled that the state did not have to recognize the adoption judgment, saying that the Georgia court misapplied its own state law.
 The court voided the recognition of the adoption judgment in Alabama.
 V.L. petitioned the United States Supreme Court to stay the ruling during her appeal and allow her to see her children.
 On December 14, 2015, the Supreme Court stayed the ruling pending their action on a petition for a writ of certiorari filed by V.L. On March 7, 2016, the Supreme Court of the United States reversed the decision of the Alabama Supreme Court by per curiam summary disposition.
Planned Parenthood v. Casey, 505 U.S. 833 (1992) , was a landmark United States Supreme Court case in which the constitutionality of several Pennsylvania state statutory provisions regarding abortion was challenged.
 The Court's plurality opinion reaffirmed the central holding of "Roe v. Wade" stating that "matters, involving the most intimate and personal choices a person may make in a lifetime, choices central to personal dignity and autonomy, are central to the liberty protected by the Fourteenth Amendment."
 The Court's plurality opinion upheld the constitutional right to have an abortion while altering the standard for analyzing restrictions on that right, crafting the "undue burden" standard for abortion restrictions.
 "Planned Parenthood v. Casey" differs from "Roe," however, because under "Roe" the state could not regulate abortions in the first trimester whereas under "Planned Parenthood v. Casey" the state can regulate abortions in the first trimester, or any point before the point of viability, and beyond as long as that regulation does not pose an undue burden on women's fundamental right to an abortion.
 Applying this new standard of review, the Court upheld four regulations and invalidated the requirement of spousal notification.
Margie Pitts Hames (December 8, 1933 – July 19, 1994) was an Atlanta civil rights lawyer who argued the abortion rights case Doe v. Bolton before the U.S. Supreme Court.
Review of court decision or abbreviated PK (Indonesian: "Peninjauan Kembali" ) is a legal action that can be taken by the convict (the person subject to the penalty) in a legal case against a court decision final and binding on the judicial system in Indonesia.
 The court ruling has called legally enforceable decision of the District Court is not filed an appeal, the decision of the High Court was not filed an appeal (legal action in the Supreme Court), or the decision of the Supreme Court.
 PK can not be taken to court decisions that have permanent legal force if the decision was a decision that states the defendant (person charged in the proceedings) are free from all charges.
Therapeutic Abortion Committees (commonly known as TACs) were committees established under the Canadian Criminal Code.
 Each committee consisted of three medical doctors who would decide whether a request for an abortion fit within the exception to the criminal offence of procuring a miscarriage, i.e. performing an abortion.
 The Criminal Code only permitted lawful abortion if continuation of a pregnancy would cause a woman medical harm, as certified by a TAC.
 The TACs were almost always composed of men, due to fewer women practicing medicine and even fewer having these types of high level positions.
 These restrictions on abortion were struck down as unconstitutional by the Supreme Court of Canada in its decision in "R v Morgentaler" in 1988.
Before the 1973 "Roe v. Wade" Supreme Court decision that opened the door to the legalization of abortion, the right-to-life movement in the U.S. consisted of lawyers, politicians, and doctors, almost all of whom were Catholic.
 The only coordinated opposition to abortion during the early 1970s came from the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops and the Family Life Bureau, also a Catholic organization.
 Prior to "Roe v. Wade" decision, abortion was not a high priority for Catholic bishops in the United States.
Joseph M. Scheidler (born September 7, 1927) is an American pro-life activist and the founder of the Pro-Life Action League.
 He is known for his work in front of abortion clinics to stop women from having abortions, and for teaching other people to work against legal abortion.
 Scheidler was the chief defendant in the NOW v. Scheidler litigation, filed in a 1986.
 A Federal Court decided against him and in favor of the National Organization for Women in 1998.
 He was found guilty of interstate racketeering, assessed fines and sentenced to prison.
 This decision was unanimously overturned by the US Supreme Court in 2003, but NOW took the case under a slightly different issue before another lower Federal Court, and it was again decided against Scheidler.
 However, this was again brought to the Supreme Court which again unanimously decided in his favor in 2006.
 The Court granted him damages against NOW.
 Scheidler lives in Chicago with his wife Ann, and has seven children and numerous grandchildren, many of whom are involved in his organization.
Doe v. Bolton, 410 U.S. 179 (1973) , was a decision of the United States Supreme Court overturning the abortion law of Georgia.
 The Supreme Court's decision was released on January 22, 1973, the same day as the decision in the better-known case of "Roe v. Wade", 410 U.S. 113 (1973) .
 "Doe v. Bolton" challenged Georgia's much more conservative abortion statute.