Question: Which king of Denmark and Norway had harsh restrictions imposed on him due to his close ties with Germany?

Context articles: Frederick III of Denmark
Ove Gjedde
Legal Services Corp. v. Velazquez
Visa requirements for Thai citizens
Failure (The Posies album)
Visa requirements for Cambodian citizens
Visa requirements for Ugandan citizens
Freedom of speech in the United States
Thomas R. Phillips
Show-cause penalty

Frederick III (Danish: "Frederik" ; 18 March 1609 – 9 February 1670) was king of Denmark and Norway from 1648 until his death in 1670.
 He also governed under the name Frederick II as diocesan administrator (colloquially referred to as prince-bishop) of the Prince-Bishopric of Verden (1623–29 and again 1634–44), and the Prince-Archbishopric of Bremen (1635–45).
Ove Gjedde (27 December 1594 – 19 December 1660) was a Danish admiral and member of the interim government that followed the death of Christian IV and imposed harsh restrictions on Frederick III due to his close ties to Germany.
Legal Services Corp. v. Velazquez, 531 U.S. 533 (2001) , is a decision of the Supreme Court of the United States concerning the constitutionality of funding restrictions imposed by the United States Congress.
 At issue were restrictions on the Legal Services Corporation (LSC), a private, non-profit corporation established by Congress.
 The restrictions prohibited LSC attorneys from representing clients attempting to amend (or challenge) existing welfare law.
 The case was brought by Carmen Velazquez, whose LSC-funded attorneys sought to challenge existing welfare provisions, believing it was the only way to get Velazquez financial relief.
Visa requirements for Thai citizens are administrative entry restrictions imposed on citizens of Thailand by the authorities of other states.
 As of 1 January 2017, Thai citizens had visa-free or visa on arrival access to 71 countries and territories, ranking the Thai passport 67th in terms of travel freedom (tied with Kazakhstani and Namibian passports) according to the Henley visa restrictions index.
Failure is the debut album of The Posies.
 It was first released independently in 1988 on cassette only.
 In 1989 it was reissued on cassette, LP and CD in 1989 on PopLlama Records.
 Due to playing time restrictions imposed by the LP manufacturer the band was forced to drop one song from the PopLlama LP edition.
 The CD version had no time restrictions and includes the same content as the cassette.
Visa requirements for Cambodian citizens are administrative entry restrictions imposed on citizens of Cambodia by the authorities of other states.
 As of 1 January 2017, Cambodian citizens had visa-free or visa on arrival access to 48 countries and territories, ranking the Cambodian passport 88th in terms of travel freedom (tied with Algerian, Comorian, Egyptian, Guinean and Laotian passports) according to the Henley visa restrictions index.
Visa requirements for Ugandan citizens are administrative entry restrictions imposed on citizens of Uganda by the authorities of other states.
 As of 1 January 2017, Ugandan citizens had visa-free or visa on arrival access to 61 countries and territories, ranking the Ugandan passport 75th in terms of travel freedom (tied with Filipino passport) according to the Henley visa restrictions index.
In the United States, freedom of speech and expression is strongly protected from government restrictions by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution, many state constitutions, and state and federal laws.
 The Supreme Court of the United States has recognized several categories of speech that are given lesser or no protection by the First Amendment and has recognized that governments may enact reasonable time, place, or manner restrictions on speech.
 The First Amendment's constitutional right of free speech, which is applicable to state and local governments under the incorporation doctrine, only prevents government restrictions on speech, not restrictions imposed by private individuals or businesses unless they are acting on behalf of the government.
 However, laws may restrict the ability of private businesses and individuals from restricting the speech of others, such as employment laws that restrict employers' ability to prevent employees from disclosing their salary with coworkers or attempting to organize a labor union.
Thomas Royal Phillips (born October 23, 1949) is an attorney with the Baker Botts firm in Austin, Texas, who was from 1988 to 2004 the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Texas.
 With nearly seventeen years of service, Phillips is the third-longest tenured Chief Justice in Texas history.
 He was appointed by Governor Bill Clements to fill a vacancy in the office in November 1987, becoming the youngest Chief Justice since Texas became a state.
 Phillips took office less than a month after CBS' "60 Minutes" ran a highly publicized story, entitled "Justice for Sale?
," which won widespread attention for its blistering critique of Texas' choice to elect judges by political party without campaign contribution limits.
 The broadcast alleged improperly close ties between several of the justices and their largest donors, who were amongst the state's most successful personal-injury trial lawyers.
 In campaigns that received national attention in 1988, Phillips and two other candidates running as Republicans won election to the Court by imposing voluntary limits on the size of campaign contributions.
 By winning, they joined Railroad Commissioner Ken Hance as the first Republican elected to statewide office since Reconstruction.
 Phillips, after serving the two years remaining on the term of his predecessor, Chief Justice John L. Hill, was elected to a full term in 1990.
 In each race he defeated one of his Democratic colleagues on the Court, Ted Z. Robertson in 1988 and Oscar H. Mauzy in 1990, who defended Texas' partisan judicial election system and declined to impose campaign contribution caps.
 Throughout his tenure, Phillips vigorously advocated a non-partisan appointment-retention election method of choosing Texas judges.
 While he was ultimately unsuccessful in this effort, like other Texas chief justices before and since, both the Legislature and the Supreme Court imposed restrictions on the amount, timing and source of campaign contributions to judges during his tenure.
In the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA), a show-cause penalty is an administrative punishment ordering that any NCAA penalties imposed on a coach found to have committed major rules violations will stay in effect against that coach for a specified period of time—and could also be transferred to any other NCAA-member school that hires the coach while the sanctions are still in effect.
 Both the school and coach are required to send letters to the NCAA agreeing to abide by any restrictions imposed.
 They must also report back to the NCAA every six months until either the end of the coach's employment or the show-cause penalty (whichever comes first).
 If the school wishes to avoid the NCAA penalties imposed on that coach, it must send representatives to appear before the NCAA's Committee on Infractions and "show cause" (i.e., prove the existence of good reason) as to why it should not be penalized for hiring that coach.
 The penalty is intended to prevent a coach from escaping punishment for violations that he/she had a role in committing or allowing—-which are generally applied to the school (e.g., lost scholarships, forfeited and vacated wins)--by merely resigning and taking a coaching job at another, unpenalized school.
 It is currently the most severe penalty that can be brought against an American collegiate coach.