Question: What 1981 legal case involved the testimony of Dorothy Nelkin?

Context articles: Taltarum's Case
Terri Schiavo case
The Atom Besieged
Dorothy Nelkin
Legal case
G &amp; G v Wikimedia Foundation Inc
Mark S Nelkin
Dawkins v. State
McLean v. Arkansas
Temple Lot Case

Taltarum's Case is the name given to a 15th-century English legal case in the Court of Common Pleas that was generally thought to have established the operation of the common recovery.
 The latter was a collusive legal procedure designed to evade the statute "De donis conditionalibus", and was for centuries an important element of English law of real property.
 The recovery operated to break an entail on freehold or copyhold property held in fee tail - which could not be freely sold or transferred - leaving it in fee simple, so that it could be freely sold or a new settlement arranged.
 Although recoveries had been used before the case to bar entails, the judges' extensive discussion of the principles involved meant that in succeeding centuries the common recovery's procedures, and even the names of some of the fictitious individuals involved in them, were modelled on the case.
The Terri Schiavo case was a right-to-die legal case in the United States from 1990 to 2005, involving Theresa Marie "Terri" Schiavo (December 3, 1963 – March 31, 2005), a woman in an irreversible persistent vegetative state.
 Schiavo's husband and legal guardian argued that Schiavo would not have wanted prolonged artificial life support without the prospect of recovery, and elected to remove her feeding tube.
 Schiavo's parents disputed her husband's assertions and challenged Schiavo's medical diagnosis, arguing in favor of continuing artificial nutrition and hydration.
 The highly publicized and prolonged series of legal challenges presented by her parents, which ultimately involved state and federal politicians up to the level of President George W. Bush, caused a seven-year delay before Schiavo's feeding tube was ultimately removed.
The Atom Besieged: Extraparliamentary Dissent in France and Germany is a 1981 book by Dorothy Nelkin and Michael Pollak.
 This book examines the opposition to nuclear power in France and West Germany in the 1970s, which is assessed as being broadly based and widespread.
 The authors argue that the basic fear which accounted for the vehemence of the opposition is that nuclear power fundamentally alters the makeup of society.
Dorothy Wolfers Nelkin ((1933--) 30, 1933 – (2003--) 28, 2003 ) was an American sociologist of science most noted for her work researching and chronicling the unsettled relationship between science and society at large.
 Her work often drew attention to the ramifications of unchecked scientific advances and the unwariness of the public towards scientific authority.
 She was the author or co-author of 26 books, including "Selling Science: How the Press Covers Science and Technology," "The Molecular Gaze: Art in the Genetic Age," and "Body Bazaar: The Market for Human Tissue in the Biotechnology Age."
 She was a supporter of the National Center for Science Education (NCSE), and in 1981 testified for the plaintiffs in McLean v. Arkansas.
 She had a broad impact in science studies, the history of science, bioethics and in the public assessment of science and technology.
 She was one of the founding members of the Society for the Social Studies of Science and served on governmental and other advisory boards.
 She often addressed the legal community, political leaders and the general public.
A legal case is a dispute between opposing parties resolved by a court, or by some equivalent legal process.
 A legal case may be either civil or criminal.
 In each legal case there is an accuser and one or more defendants.
G & G vs. Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. [2009] EWHC 3148 (QB) was an English legal case.
 The case involved "G" who sought a Norwich Pharmacal order requiring that the respondent disclose the IP address of an individual who had edited Wikipedia to include private and sensitive information about her and her child.
 The order was granted.
Mark S. Nelkin is a theoretical physicist at the Cornell University.
 Under the direction of Professor Hans Bethe, received his Ph.D. in theoretical physics from Cornell in 1955.
 Nelkin was married to American sociologist of science Dorothy Nelkin until her death in 2003.
Dawkins v. State, 252 P.3d 214 (Okla. 2011), is a legal case involving limitations on the right to self-defense and stand your ground laws.
 The court determined that stand your ground laws do not justify use of deadly force, if defendant is engaged in other unlawful activity at the time.
 The case involved a defendant with a right to lawfully protect where he stood, but who used an illegal weapon with deadly force to stand his ground.
McLean v. Arkansas Board of Education, 529 F. Supp.
 1255, 1258-1264 (ED Ark. 1982), was a 1981 legal case in the US state of Arkansas.
The Temple Lot Case (also known as the Temple Lot Suit and formally known as The Reorganized Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints, complainant, v. the Church of Christ at Independence, Missouri) was a United States legal case in the 1890s which addressed legal ownership of the Temple Lot, a significant parcel of land in the Latter Day Saint movement.
 In the case, the Reorganized Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints (RLDS Church) claimed legal title of the land and asked the court to order the Church of Christ (Temple Lot) to cease its occupation of the property.
 The RLDS Church won the case at trial, but the decision was reversed on appeal.