october 30 - 31. the data reviewed at that meeting suggested that growth in the third quarter had been solid – at a 3. 9 percent rate, according to the initial estimate by the bureau of economic analysis. residential construction declined sharply during the quarter, as expected, subtracting about 1 percentage point from overall growth. however, the gdp report provided scant evidence of spillovers from housing to other components of final demand : strong growth in consumer spending was supported by gains in employment and income, and businesses increased their capital spending at a solid pace. a strong global economy stimulated foreign demand for u. s. - produced goods and services, as foreign trade contributed nearly 1 percentage point to the growth of real output last quarter. looking forward, however, the committee did not see the recent growth performance as likely to be sustained in the near term. financial conditions had improved somewhat after the september fomc action, but the market for nonconforming mortgages remained significantly impaired, and survey information suggested that banks had tightened terms and standards for a range of credit products over recent months. in part because of the reduced availability of mortgage credit, the contraction in housing - related activity seemed likely to intensify. indicators of overall consumer sentiment suggested that household spending would grow more slowly, a reading consistent with the expected effects of higher energy prices, tighter credit, and continuing weakness in housing. most businesses appeared to enjoy relatively good access to credit, but heightened uncertainty about economic prospects could lead business spending to decelerate as well. overall, the committee expected that the growth of economic activity would slow noticeably in the fourth quarter from its third - quarter rate. growth was seen as remaining sluggish during the first part of next year, then strengthening as the effects of tighter credit and the housing correction began to wane. the committee also saw downside risks to this projection : one such risk was that financial market conditions would fail to improve or even worsen, causing credit conditions to become even more restrictive than expected. another risk was that, in light of the problems in mortgage markets and the large inventories of unsold homes, house prices might weaken more than expected, which could further reduce consumers'willingness to spend and increase investors'concerns about mortgage credit. the committee projected overall and core inflation to be in a range consistent with price stability next year. supporting this view were modest improvements in core inflation over the course of the year, inflation expectations that appeared reasonably well anchored, and futures quotes suggesting that

, and the issuance of such securities has declined significantly. prime jumbo loans are still being made to prospective home purchasers, but they are at higher spreads and have more - restrictive terms. concerns about mortgage - backed securities and structured credit products ( even those unrelated to mortgages ) also greatly reduced investor appetite for asset - backed commercial paper, although that market has improved somewhat recently. in the area of business credit, investors shied away from financing leveraged buyouts and from purchasing speculative - grade corporate bonds. and some larger banks, concerned about potentially large and difficult - to - predict draws on their liquidity and balance sheet capacity, became less willing to provide funding to their customers or to each other. to be sure, the recent developments may well lead to a healthier financial system in the medium to long term : increased investor scrutiny of structured credit products is likely to lead ultimately to greater transparency in these products and to better differentiation among assets of varying quality. investors have also become more cautious and are demanding greater compensation for bearing risk. in the short term, however, these events do imply a greater measure of financial restraint on economic growth as credit becomes more expensive and difficult to obtain. federal reserve policy actions at the height of the recent financial turmoil, the federal reserve took a number of steps to help markets return to more orderly functioning. the fed increased liquidity in short - term money markets in early august through larger - than - normal open market operations. and on august 17, the federal reserve board cut the discount rate – the rate at which it lends directly to banks – 50 basis points, or 1 / 2 percentage point, and subsequently took several additional measures. these efforts to provide liquidity appear to have been helpful on the whole, but the functioning of a number of important markets remained impaired. the turmoil in financial markets significantly affected the federal reserve's outlook for the broader economy. indeed, in a statement issued simultaneously with the board's august 17 announcement of the cut in the discount rate, the federal open market committee ( fomc ) noted that the downside risks to economic growth had increased appreciably. the committee took further action at its next scheduled meeting, on september 18, when it cut its target for the federal funds rate 50 basis points. this action was intended as a counterbalance to the tightening of credit conditions and to address in a preemptive fashion some of the risks that financial developments posed to the broader economy. the committee met most recently on