##sson, peter and tommy von bromsen ( 2021 ), “ coronavirus pandemic : the riksbank's measures and financial developments during spring and summer 2020 ”, economic review 2021 : 1, sveriges riksbank kjellberg, david and m. ahl ( 2022 ), “ the riksbank ’ s financial result and capital are affected by higher interest rates ”, economic commentaries, no. 8 2022, sveriges riksbank krishnamurthy, arvind and annette vissing - jorgensen ( 2011 ), " the effects of quantitative easing on interest rates : channels and implications for policy ", brookings papers on economic activity, fall 2011 levin, andrew, brian lu and william nelson ( 2022 ), ” quantifying the costs and benefits of quantitative easing ”, manuscript, hoover institution nordstrom, amanda and anders vredin ( 2022 ), ” does central bank equity matter for monetary policy? ( 2022 ) ", staff memo december 2022, sveriges riksbank riksbank ( 2014 ), “ financial stability report 2014 : 2 ”, sveriges riksbank riksbank ( 2015 ), ” minutes of the monetary policy meeting in february 2015 ”, sveriges riksbank riksbank ( 2016 ), “ repo rate cut to - 0. 50 per cent ”, press release 11 february 2016, sveriges riksbank. sveriges riksbank ( 2020a ), “ financial stability report 2020 : 1 ”, sveriges riksbank riksbank ( 2020b ), “ monetary policy report november 2020 ”, sveriges riksbank riksbank ( 2020c ), ” minutes of the monetary policy meeting in november 2020 ”, sveriges riksbank 27 riksbank ( 2020d ), “ monetary policy report april 2020 ”, sveriges riksbank riksbank ( 2021 ) “ rapidly rising housing prices despite the coronavirus crisis ”, article in monetary policy report, april 2021, sveriges riksbank. riksbank ( 2022 ), “ financial stability report 2022 : 2 ”, sveriges riksbank stella, peter and ake lonnberg ( 2008 ), “ issues in central bank finance and independence ”, imf working paper wp / 08 / 37 tobin, james ( 1958 ), ” liquidity preference as behavior towards risk ”

( ‘ consort, spouse ’ ), but rather in the abstract one of “ consortium, sharing ”. lines 49 - 51. speak? of the lion ’ s share of goods that are the subject of economists ’ analyses, such as houses, cars or chickens : if i share my chicken with you, i will only have half left. dante stigmatised, in short, the desire for worldly goods, for all worldly goods. 20 whoever possesses them does not want to share them, because they would obtain a smaller benefit. spiritual goods are another matter entirely. god ’ s love, as virgil explains later on in an elegant doctrinal passage that anticipates the terse harmonies of the paradiso, is in no way diminished when shared with others. on the contrary, the more “ table companions ” there are to enjoy this good, the more enjoyment each of them will derive. those who desire the love of god simply have to ask for it, and no one will contest them : e quanta gente piu la su s ’ intende, piu v ’ e da bene amare, e piu vi s ’ ama, e come specchio l ’ uno a l ’ altro rende. 21 “ and the more people bend toward each other up there, the more there is to love well and the more love there is, and, like a mirror, each reflects it to the other. ” envy has no place here. rivalry, exclusion, public goods now, some six and a half centuries after dante wrote these verses, economists ( not, i believe, inspired by the poet but one never knows … ) began to wonder whether, speaking of economic goods, it is always true that “ per compagnia parte si scema ” ( sharing lessens at the end of canto xiv ( 148 - 150 ) : chiamavi ‘ l cielo e ‘ ntorno vi si gira, mostrandovi le sue bellezze etterne, e l ’ occhio vostro pur a terra mira … “ the heavens call and wheel about you, showing you their eternal beauties, and your eye still gazes on the earth … ” and afterwards, in canto ix of the paradiso ( 10 - 12 ) : “ ahi anime ingannate e fatture empie, che da si fatto ben torcete i cuori, drizzando in van