which is why adequate training to carry out the validation of models and capital adequacy assessments will be of fundamental significance. supervisors still have a lot of work to be done in order to implement basel ii. we understand that it is important to disclose, as soon as possible, an overview of our implementation plans to the industry while we internally make all the studies necessary to support the numerous decisions to be made. the next steps include, for example, the evaluation of simpler alternatives for smaller institutions ( non - bank and small banking institutions, the definition and disclosure of aspects of national discretion, the definition of eligibility criteria for irb, and, finally, the release of an “ advanced regulation notice ” - open to public / industry comments, and a country quantitative impact study considering revised aspects of national discretion.

of slower global and us growth, a new round of cuts to investment in canada ’ s energy sector, and a stronger canadian dollar would have meant a lower projected growth profile for the canadian economy than we had in january. i know this sounds contrary to what you have heard lately, because a range of monthly economic indicators have started the year strongly. some of this strength represents a catchup after temporary weakness in the fourth quarter, and some of it reflects temporary factors that will unwind in the second quarter. we think it is best to look through that variability, and note that the economy appears to be achieving average growth of close to 2 per cent in the first half of the year, which is encouraging. that brings me to the fourth important item that ’ s changed since january – the recent federal budget. we can ’ t be entirely certain about the full effects of the budget on the economy, as some will depend on how households react over time. but governing council judged that the budget actions will more than offset the negatives from the other three changes i just mentioned. the net effect is that our projected growth profile is generally higher than it was in january. when it comes to projecting inflation, we must consider our forecast for economic growth relative to the economy ’ s potential, or capacity. we do a fulsome review of canada ’ s economic bis central bankers ’ speeches potential at this time each year, and this was an especially important part of the governing council ’ s deliberations. that is because, as we highlighted in last october ’ s mpr, it is particularly difficult to measure capacity when an economy is undergoing a structural adjustment, as canada ’ s is. that translates into increased uncertainty around the size of the output gap and the speed at which it will close, and therefore the point at which the disinflationary pressures we see today will dissipate. specifically, the collapse in investment in the commodity sector will mean a slowdown in the economy ’ s potential growth rate. in the near term, we ’ ve lowered potential output growth from 1. 8 per cent to 1. 5 per cent. you can find details in a staff analytical note we published today. later this year, the natural sequence of higher non - resource exports and a tightening of capacity constraints should lead to higher investment and employment in the non - resource economy, and therefore growing capacity. looking beyond the projection horizon, growth in potential output overall should pick up again. this newly - added capacity may