choongsoo kim : financial integration, financial stability and central banking speech by mr choongsoo kim, governor of the bank of korea, at the international conference on “ financial integration, financial stability and central banking ”, organized by japan financial services agency, tokyo, 10 february 2012. * * * good morning, ladies and gentlemen. it is a true pleasure and privilege for me to be here this morning. i am very grateful to commissioner hatanaka of the financial services agency, chairman mae of japan securities dealers association, and president saito of tokyo stock exchange group, for inviting me to this conference as a keynote speaker. as we all know, the global crisis has demonstrated how financial disruption in a major economy can quickly spill over to affect the entire world, through a complex web of interconnected markets and cross - border exposures. and while causing global recession, these spillovers also manifested themselves in diverse forms, depending upon where the weakest points in the vulnerability chain lay – for example, leading to fiscal crises in advanced economies and to abrupt capital flow reversals in emerging economies. the crisis also revealed a number of shortcomings in our financial regulation and supervision, as shown for instance by our failure to detect the systemic risk arising from pro - cyclicality and nonlinearity in asset prices. given its far reaching impact on the financial sector and the broader economy as well, the global crisis has and will continue to cast a long shadow on financial and real activities over the coming years if not decades. but it has also brought us important lessons and new thinking about central banking, financial regulation and fiscal prudence. and we have made substantial progress, ranging from formulating a strengthened regulatory framework to laying the foundation for better international policy coordination through bodies such as the g20. and now, as we enter our fourth year since the crisis, i would argue that it is time to pay greater attention to reviving economic growth and the related policy agenda. the ensuring of financial stability – or more broadly macroeconomic stability – is of course a prerequisite for reviving growth, but the converse is also true. the real and financial sector linkages in other words involve two - way traffic. and indeed, it is hard to imagine that the highly indebted countries in europe will be able to succeed in putting their public finances on sustainable footings if their growths remain stagnant. in this respect, global financial resources may have in recent years been directed too much toward financing of un

themselves ( imf, 2011 ) 1. i think these stability gains are particularly relevant for asia, where the brunt of regional trade and finance is denominated and settled in the dollar and other reserve currencies. heavy dependence on the dollar has nurtured currency and maturity mismatches here, and the associated liquidity risks of individual banks have often translated into sovereign risks as our domestic financial markets have offered little scope for liquidity trade. and while asia has been relatively free from financial crises since 1997, this has been aided by capital controls or large holdings of low - yield foreign reserves or both. if better integrated asian markets can produce more safe assets of our own, offer greater risk hedging, and help to reduce financial mismatches, the financial stability gains to us could be quite large. korea ’ s recent experience offers some anecdotal evidence of the potential benefits of bond market integration. specifically, increased investment in korean treasuries by asian official investors helped very much last year to offset capital outflows from our country driven by eurozone investors. despite efforts devoted for more than a decade, however, asian market integration is still far less than satisfactory. for instance, intra - regional bond investment accounts only for 7 percent of total bond investment in asia, compared to figures of 59 percent for the eu and 19 percent for north america. in this light, the asian bond markets initiative ( abmi ) should remain a high priority on asia ’ s financial reform agenda. we should keep in mind as well that financial integration is a market process that takes a very long time and evolves only gradually. policies and institutions implemented to promote financial integration may – and perhaps should – also differ across time and place. but i do not think asian markets are intrinsically different, in terms of their modus operandi, from other advanced markets. therefore, i believe asian market integration should be guided by the same principles adopted by advanced markets – such as greater exchange rate flexibility, speech by mr choongsoo kim, governor of the bank of korea, at the international conference on “ financial integration, financial stability and central banking ”, organized by japan financial services agency, tokyo, 10 february 2012. bis central bankers ’ speeches freer capital mobility, transparent rules and regulations, and fair competition based upon reciprocity. in addition, a clear roadmap should be in place to enable the private sector to prepare itself well in advance for the changes that are coming.