They also require soundly functioning and well-integrated financial markets capable of diversifying risks across borders and correctly pricing concentration risks. This is why, in my view, the most immediate and significant challenge facing EMU is to reinforce the integration of both banking systems and capital markets. Reinforcing the Banking Union When the euro was launched, there was actually an expectation that many banks would become truly European, providing retail services across the whole euro area. The reality is quite different. 6/11  Cross-border consolidation remains very limited and most firms and households in the euro area remain largely dependent on their domestic banking systems to maintain investment and smooth consumption profiles. Although no formal barriers to foreign banks exist, relevant distortions arise from stillsignificant specificities in banking regulations across countries. Some of the existing savings banks, government-owned banks or regional banks in the EU are protected by national legislations hampering incentives to compete or effectively sheltering them from competition. Moreover, regulation fails to fully acknowledge the benefits generally arising from geographical diversification in a single market. We also need to address the current deadlock on the third pillar of the Banking Union, the European Deposit Insurance Scheme (EDIS). Some experts argue that this third element may not be essential once we have in place a stringent resolution framework with homogeneous bail-in requirements; but in my view, it remains crucial to make EDIS a reality.

Poverty still remains at significant levels; marked disparities in regional economic activity are clearly evident; unemployment, although declining, is still high, particularly among the youth; agricultural productivity is low, resulting in low farmer income and higher prices for consumers; despite some diversification of the economy, exports are concentrated in a few commodities and a few markets, thereby increasing the vulnerability of the economy; the fiscal deficit has remained high, resulting in inflationary pressures and increasing public debt; and essential economic infrastructure remains inadequate. These concerns have been aggravated by the tragic consequences of the tsunami that resulted in the loss of so many lives and extensive destruction of property. Today, the challenge is to consider how to achieve a balanced growth with economic and social stability. Let me now highlight some of the specifics on recent economic developments and policy challenges. Macroeconomic developments Sri Lanka was able to maintain an annual average economic growth of around 5 per cent in the post liberalization era. The country’s resilience to adverse shocks has improved with a significant diversification of economic activity, particularly in the export structure. This enabled Sri Lanka to achieve a growth of 5.4 per cent in 2004, in spite of several major shocks, such as the surge in international oil prices, a severe drought in the early part of the year and floods later in the year and finally, the tsunami disaster. Per capita income has increased to US dollars 1,030 in 2004.