Third, the euro area has a balanced current account. As such, the euro area does not contribute to global imbalances, one of the main challenges facing the global economy and the world community. It is worth stressing that the euro area is the relevant dimension to consider for a vast single currency and economic area with a common exchange rate and monetary policy. And there, the numbers are clear: the euro area current account balance averaged less than 0.1% of GDP over 2005–2007 before the global crisis broke out, according to IMF figures. Moreover, the euro area current account is still projected by the Fund to be broadly balanced this year and the next up to 2015. The picture is very different in other parts of the world. A concern is that after some partial reduction induced by the crisis, global imbalances are starting to widen again. This raises challenges for international monetary and financial cooperation. The euro area has a significant stake in effective global re-balancing, notably through sounder domestic policies worldwide which, in turn, would contribute to global external stability. The global economy has a lot of homework to do if it is to address these challenges. People of goodwill, inspired by the desire to keep the global economy “open, market-based, just and protective” will surely be needed to that end. Credit should therefore be given to initiatives such as the Global Economy Prize to encourage them to press ahead in that direction. 2  BIS central bankers’ speeches

The risks the world economy faces in the medium term - associated to an abrupt resolution of global imbalances, a commodity price downturn, a slowdown of global growth, or an abrupt shift in risk perception and valuation by global investors - require that the agenda on international financial architecture be focused more on preventing, rather than resolving crises ex post. As countries are progressively more integrated into a more global financial system, new challenges emerge for economic authorities. The increased mobility of international capital flows - beyond their potential benefits - entails the risks of sudden and unexpected reversal of capital flows that could be further worsened by the contagion associated to the financial market reaction. Also, in the current market-driven international environment, characterized by increasing access of emerging economies to private funding, and by a more complex international financial system, externalities, market failures and perverse incentive effects are still in place and impede private financial flows to become a permanent and stable source of financing. Therefore, strengthening countries’ resilience is not only about developing and improving appropriate and consistent policies and institutions, but also about providing countries with access to emergency liquidity and the possibility to obtain short-term liquidity by private financial instruments. The Fund should therefore play a leading role in facilitating the development of more complete global financial markets, which will ultimately help emerging economies to protect themselves against external reversals while complementing authorities’ efforts in building up a sound policy framework.