This calls for a revision of this view.2 In my remarks today, I would like to start by discussing some general issues regarding the linkages between price and financial stability and the linkages between monetary and macroprudential policy. In the second part of this talk, I will refer to the context of international capital flows and policy responses in a small open economy with inflation targeting, and the relation that monetary policy has to have with macroprudential policies in that context. Interactions between Monetary and Financial Policies Most central banks care not only about price stability, but also about financial stability. The goal for price stability is usually the main mandate of central banks, and is widely understood as maintaining low and stable inflation, which also reduces the deviations of output from its potential. However, the central bank’s mandate for preserving financial stability is less explicitly defined; probably in part because there is less agreement on what is financial stability and what should be considered an indicator of it. Broadly understood, it encompasses a stable and fundamental-driven credit and asset price growth, as well as the absence of large mismatches in the financial sector. It is not the purpose of my talk to narrow the definition of financial stability, so I will use the term in a broad sense. There is also the key distinction between micro and macro financial stability, and in most of what follows I will be focusing on the systemic aspects of financial stability, unless noticed otherwise.

The international standards require supervisors to appropriately supervise, monitor and regulate financial institutions for compliance with AML/CFT requirements commensurate with their risks. As such, to effectively implement the above, a country’s AML/CFT supervision has to be embedded in the broader framework of prudential and business conduct supervision. This is to leverage on and optimise the synergies, expertise and resources to ensure effectiveness of both overall supervision of financial institutions and specific AML/CFT supervision. Supervisors are required to ensure effective management of ML/TF risk and compliance with AML/CFT requirements by the financial institutions by assessing institution’s policies, procedures and processes for identifying and managing ML/TF risk and in complying with regulatory requirements. This integration also ensure that supervisors are coherent and apply high standards in fulfilling their responsibilities for both AML/CFT and prudential supervision. As for AML/CFT, supervisors have to include AML/CFT risk in their risk based approach to supervisions and to be fully aware of consequences and implications of theirs supervised institutions’ failures to adequately identify and manage all risks including ML/TF risk. This is because the issue is no longer just about technical compliance but more importantly, whether the supervisory framework has been effective in mitigating and in ensuring adequate enforcement against ML/TF. Therefore, to equip supervisors in fulfilling their duties to conduct AML/CFT supervision, courses such as this is important to provide all of you with an understanding of the importance of reviewing the operational, legal, and reputational risks associated with ML/TF and their impact on the overall bank assessment.