Price stability itself has coincided with – some would say produced – a prolonged period of strong growth and low output volatility, which, as you know, has been dubbed the “great moderation". One major disappointment however, has been that price stability has not led to financial stability. On the contrary, it seems that, over the last two decades, financial crises have become more frequent, with increasingly serious consequences for growth and welfare. To get a sense of this puzzle, it may be useful to look at the intrinsic dynamics of the financial system. Both in normal times and times of stress, amplification mechanisms are at work, which exacerbate the impact of any specific shock. These mechanisms act through changes in leverage, liquidity, and risk aversion. These three factors interact in a complex and sometimes unpredictable way. For instance, growth in leverage may be fuelled by an increase in risk appetite. In turn, larger balance sheets of financial intermediaries give rise to liquidity expansion and growing risk appetite. It is easy to see how these dynamics can create strong procyclicality in the evolution of asset prices and credit aggregates. It is also likely that procyclicality is partly created, or accentuated, by our accounting and prudential regimes. If financial procyclicality was a short-term, mean-reverting, phenomenon, there would be little cause for concern. Unfortunately, those same mechanisms allow for the progressive buildup, over a long period of time, of significant imbalances and deviations in asset prices. At some stage, the correction becomes unavoidable, and is generally abrupt.

Loan growth in July increased to 11.8 percent while deposits including bill of exchange grew by 1.9 percent. Liquidity in the system remains adequate, with loan/deposit ratio excluding interbank transactions at 90.1 percent in July. On asset quality, gross NPL ratio edged downward to 6.4 percent in June. These numbers show that the performance of the Thai banking sector is quite robust, and is well positioned to support the economy. Fourth, a more difficult picture to assess is the impact of the turmoil on the economy and how this would translate into the impact on the banking sector. So far, notwithstanding the less helpful global environment, the Thai economy has performed relatively well, with growth averaging 5.7 percent in the first half of this year. But going forward, market participants expect the economy to become more affected by the slowing global economy. Our own forecast also sees growth to be less buoyant in the second half of the year, reflecting a more adverse impact on exports. But overall, the momentum of growth should not be too adversely affected given the support that growth could gain from domestic demand which is being supported by high farm income, continued credit availability, and supportive fiscal policy. Moreover, lower oil prices and monetary policy that focuses on inflation should provide a stable price environment conducive to domestic demand and to export competitiveness. Also, continued current account surpluses, lower external indebtedness, and high domestic savings have made the economy’s financial conditions more stable, by reducing its dependency on capital flows.