Monetary policy in Norway is oriented towards low and stable inflation. This is the most important contribution monetary policy can make to sound economic developments in the long term. Low and stable inflation provides enterprises and households with an anchor for inflation expectations. In its conduct of monetary policy, Norges Bank operates a flexible inflation targeting regime, so that weight is given both to variability in inflation and variability in output and employment. Flexible inflation targeting builds a bridge between the long-term objective of monetary policy, which is to keep inflation on target and provide an anchor for inflation expectations, and the short-term objective of stabilising economic developments. Transparency surrounding Norges Bank’s assessments of monetary policy trade-offs enhances economic agents’ understanding of how economic news influences the interest rate. In recent years, it has become easier to read the Bank’s intentions. As a result, monetary policy has become more effective. The background material for the Executive Board’s monetary policy meetings is published and the assessments underlying the interest rate decisions are explained. As from last autumn, the Bank publishes its own interest rate forecast. From using technical assumptions and others’ assessments, we have taken ownership of the interest rate path in our projections. Even though  BIS Review 44/2006  1  considerable uncertainty still remains, it becomes easier for economic agents to assess interest rate developments. Weak growth in the world economy early this decade led to low interest rates in many countries.

On 17 September, American International Group (AIG), the largest US insurance company, had to rely on an emergency loan from the Federal Reserve. The company played a key role in the credit default insurance market. The financial crisis has heightened in several European countries. Banks in Belgium, Denmark, France, the Netherlands, the UK, Sweden and Germany have been taken over by the government or other financial institutions. In Iceland, the authorities took over the three largest banks and are now unwinding their international operations. The crisis at these banks prompted a flight from Iceland’s national currency which, combined with a property market crash, has triggered a sharp recession. In Norway, the effects of the financial crisis have also occurred more rapidly and become more pronounced than the outlook seemed to imply only recently. Norway is still in a better position than most countries. Capacity utilisation in the Norwegian economy has been very high. The surplus on current account is considerable and government finances are solid. Norwegian banks have limited exposures to international securities. They have suffered only small losses and recorded solid earnings in recent years. Furthermore, the Norwegian banking system is not large relative to the size of the Norwegian economy. In response to the uncertain environment, banks abroad and at home are reluctant to lend to each other and are tightening their credit standards. Credit channels are drying up. Money market rates have increased markedly, and to levels substantially higher than central bank key rates.