In particular, the banks were unable to adjust lending rates according to the perceived creditworthiness of borrowers, and resorted instead to significant collateral requirements and to credit rationing. Furthermore, because the scarcity of land in Malta seemed to guarantee that its value would never go down, property has always been considered a safe investment, so that Maltese banks relied heavily on real estate as collateral, attaching insufficient importance to the viability of projects. As a result, many potential customers were denied access to credit. This, together with the absence of a capital market, meant that savings could not be channelled effectively into productive private investment and tended to flow instead either into inefficient Government-owned enterprises, into the property market or, despite exchange controls, into overseas assets. This situation created imbalances in bank balance sheets, which, when the economy was liberalised and exposed to market forces, came to represent a potential threat to financial stability. For example, the changes in relative prices that occurred in the wake of liberalisation tended, in some cases, to result in a deterioration in loan quality. Furthermore, bank balance sheets included a large number of Government-guaranteed loans to public corporations and utilities that were largely shielded from competition. Despite these distortions, however, no major bank collapse or financial crisis was experienced. A major change occurred in the late 1980s and early 1990s when a programme of financial liberalisation and privatisation fundamentally transformed the economic climate. For a start, the Government’s shareholding in the banks was reduced.

Malta has also adopted the European Directive of 4th April 2001 on the reorganisation and winding up of credit institutions and their branches in Member States, which should facilitate the harmonisation of any eventual measures that may have to be taken in this regard. In compliance with EU legislation on the promotion of international payments, the Central Bank has meanwhile brought into force the Directive on Cross-border Credit Transfers. Another Directive, on Electronic Payments Services, which seeks to ensure a high level of consumer protection in the field of electronic payment instruments, came into force on May 1st this year. Looking forward, we believe that Malta’s financial system is well placed to benefit from EU membership. While the banks may face some challenges from increased competition, there will also be opportunities for growth. In particular, Malta is well positioned to serve as a bridgehead between Europe and North Africa, and some Maltese banks have already been exploiting this market niche, participating actively in the Mediterranean Bank Network set up after the Barcelona Declaration of 1995. The recent emergence of Libya on the international scene, a country with considerable potential with which Malta has long maintained close commercial ties, should also open up further opportunities in this direction. Malta’s inherent qualities, moreover, make it an attractive location. The island has a stable economic and political environment as well as a highly qualified and motivated workforce in the legal, accounting and consulting services professions and in banking and finance.