This process of re-intermediation put considerable  2  BIS Review 139/2007  pressure on the profitability, asset quality and capital adequacy, to the extent of creating great tension in the inter-bank market, as financial institutions hoarded liquid funds. Ninth, as you all know, major central banks had to step in to provide liquidity in order to ease tightness in the money market. They have been doing so for about three months now, which is not a good sign, because of the implication of a continuing lack of trust among financial institutions in lending to each other. In one particular jurisdiction, a problem at the wholesale money market level triggered a breakdown of depositors’ confidence at the retail level, resulting in a bank run. In the United States, the Fed further responded with a shift in monetary policy, notwithstanding continuing concerns over rising inflation, and cut interest rates twice, presumably to pre-empt credit tightness from adversely affecting economic prospects generally and the property market in particular. Tenth, meanwhile, financial institutions in the United States are writing off large amounts quarter after quarter and this is affecting the general availability of credit and prospects of the economy, notwithstanding lower interest rates, and increasing the probability of a recession, although many still put this at less than 50-50. This seems to be the general sentiment currently reflected in financial market performance in the United States. There has also been much greater short-term volatility, as new information is absorbed by the market, indicating considerable nervousness.

Bush, O., Guimaraes, R., and Stremmel, H. (2015), “Beyond the credit gap: quantity and price of risk indicators for macroprudential policy”, mimeo. Dixit, A. and Lambertini, L. (2003), “Interactions of Commitment and Discretion in Monetary and Fiscal Policies”, American Economic Review, Vol. 93 No.5. Elliott, D. J., Feldberg. G. and Lehnert, A. (2013), “The History of Cyclical Macroprudential Policy in the United States”, Finance and Economics Discussion Series, 2013-29. Fernie, S. and Metcalf, D. (1999), “It's Not What You Pay it's the Way that You Pay it and that's What Gets Results: Jockeys' Pay and Performance”, Labour: Review of Labour Economics & Industrial Relations, 13 (2), pp. 385-411. Ferrero, A., Harrison, R. and Nelson, B. (forthcoming), “Concerted efforts? Monetary policy and macroprudential tools”. Groves, T., Hong, Y., McMillan, J. and Naughton, B. (1994), “Autonomy and Incentives in Chinese State Enterprises”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 109:1, pp. 183-209. Goodhart, C. (2015), “Linkages between macro-prudential and micro-prudential supervision”, Butterworths Journal of International Banking and Financial Law, 30 (10), pp. 607-609. Holmstrom, B. and Milgrom, P. (1991), “Principal-agent analyses: incentive contracts, asset ownership, and job design”, Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization, Vol. 7, pp. 24-52. 15  All speeches are available online at www.bankofengland.co.uk/speeches  15  Kohn, D. (2017), “Cooperation and coordination across policy domains”, Speech given at the Joint Financial Stability Institute and Bank for International Settlements conference on supervisory policy implementation in the current macro-financial environment, available at https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/speech/2017/cooperation-and-coordination-across-policy-domains.