Not all of them disappeared though, for example, Charlemagne capital bought four regional banks and consolidated them into a single bank. Cleaning up the market, by removing inefficient banks, laid foundations for a healthier banking system, resistant to macroeconomic disturbances and improved risk management. Moreover, these two crises made us attentive to emerging risks, such as rapid credit growth or lax risk management practices and generated political support required to provide us with the toolkit needed to prevent future disruptions in the financial sector with large spillovers to the real economy and potentially huge costs to the budget. Since then, we continued cleaning up the system with no threat to either the financial stability or the budget. Navigating the Boom and the Bust The resumption of growth and resolution of weak banks eventually stabilized the banking system, setting the stage for the period of rapid international integration and financial deepening of the 2000's. After the first clean-up at the turn of the century, the number of banks has fallen to slightly above 40, and consolidated institutions started to compete strongly. In their pursuit of higher market shares, banks turned to foreign sources of financing, facilitated by extremely favourable financing conditions and high liquidity at the global level. At the surface, the financial sector supported the story of economic growth and convergence. However, experiences from the 1990s provided an optics needed to spot risks emerging underneath.

This MoU sets a framework of cooperation among OIC member countries in key economic activities, with the objective of enhancing the opportunities for economic growth and development. Today’s Seminar is indeed a testimony to the continued efforts by both the IDB and Malaysia in enhancing the cooperation and deepening of business relationship. As all of us are aware, infrastructure development is a critical component to unlock potential economic activities, thus supporting sustainable economic growth of a nation. Malaysia has placed great emphasis on infrastructure development as part of its economic transformation, diversifying from agriculture to manufacturing and, in more recent years, in the services sector as well. Over the last ten years, the Government of Malaysia has allocated a total of nearly RM100 billion for infrastructure development mainly in transport, energy and public utilities. The Malaysian government has also encouraged the participation of the private sector in the development of infrastructure through privatization and the public-private partnership (PPP) policies. On the global front, the estimated value of infrastructure development is estimated to be USD35 trillion over the next 20 years. For the Asian region alone, a study done by the Asian Development Bank (ADB) reveals that the region needs USD750 billion per year over the year 2010–2020 to meet the rising needs of infrastructure development. Out of this, the needs for the ASEAN region have been estimated to be over USD60 billion per year. Considering the vast opportunities of infrastructure projects regionally and globally, Malaysian contractors should seize the opportunity for further expansion of their business.