At the same time, it is crucial to carefully assess the macro-economic impact of the measures. In this context, the outcome of the quantitative impact assessment that is currently being conducted needs to be awaited before taking any final decisions. Inappropriate calibration of the measures may impact on the provision of credit to the real economy. This is particularly relevant for the EU financial system which is more bankdependent and where the substitutability between market finance and bank finance is more limited when compared to, for example, the US. The main challenge consists in ensuring a more resilient and stable financial system that neither compromises economic recovery nor unduly impinges on financial innovation. Second, we need to ensure that we effectively capture all systemically important financial institutions, products, markets and infrastructures within the scope of regulation. One of the lessons from the crisis was the need to make the shadow banking sector more transparent. This becomes more urgent as we tighten the regulatory net for the banking sector. Otherwise we may simply shift risks to unregulated or more loosely regulated entities. In this respect let me mention the OTC derivative markets. These markets should be subject to greater transparency by promoting the reporting of non-centralised trades to trade repositories. Additionally, we should promote the clearing of eligible OTC derivatives transactions through central counterparties, which should be themselves subject to high prudential and operational standards. Finally, we need to effectively address the risks posed by systemically important financial institutions.

At the same time, the role of the financial services sector in the recent global economic meltdown has also raised questions on the issue of the quality of the leadership and workforce and for the need to place greater focus on developing ethical and responsible leaders who will be able to lead a sustainable industry over the medium and longer term. The economic costs of a failure to arrest talent shortages are strategically significant and include low productivity, the slow pace of innovation and lost opportunities. Building a strong talent pipeline has therefore become an economic imperative as human capital rivals financial capital as the critical economic engine of the future. This requires new and innovative ways of thinking about talent development, programs, processes and competencies. The human capital challenge has therefore to be approached with a different set of solutions. Giving recognition to its importance, in the United States, the accounting rules were adjusted to allow organisations to treat a wider range of talent development costs in the same manner as long-term investments in equipment, manufacturing plants and other facilities. Financial institutions today are also forming stronger relationships with business schools to increase the relevance of their curriculum. The World Economic Forum, through its recent work on skills and talent mobility, has fostered a concerted, multi-stakeholder, cooperation and dialogue among policy-makers, relevant international institutions, governments and businesses to develop interdisciplinary solutions to address the talent shortage.