sail/symbolic-instruction-tuning huggingface dataset:
[Table] header: Date | Opponent | Score | Loss | Record row 1 : September 1 | @ White Sox | 5 - 1 | Staley (5-2) | 74-53
row 2 : September 2 | @ White Sox | 4 - 3 | Aguirre (2-3) | 74-54
row 3 : September 3 | @ Athletics | 5 - 2 | Garcia (10-12) | 74-55
row 4 : September 3 | @ Athletics | 2 - 1 | Burnette (3-7) | 75-55
row 5 : September 4 | @ Athletics | 5 - 2 | Score (15-9) | 75-56
row 6 : September 7 | White Sox | 2 - 1 | Lemon (18-12) | 75-57
row 7 : September 8 | White Sox | 4 - 2 | Wynn (16-9) | 75-58
row 8 : September 9 | White Sox | 4 - 1 | Donovan (10-8) | 76-58
row 9 : September 9 | White Sox | 6 - 2 | Aguirre (2-4) | 76-59
row 10 : September 11 | Orioles | 3 - 1 | Moore (11-7) | 77-59
row 11 : September 12 | Orioles | 2 - 1 | Brown (9-5) | 78-59
row 12 : September 13 | Orioles | 4 - 1 | Aguirre (2-5) | 78-60
row 13 : September 14 | Red Sox | 10 - 2 | Parnell (7-5) | 79-60
row 14 : September 14 | Red Sox | 4 - 3 | Mossi (6-5) | 79-61
row 15 : September 15 | Red Sox | 5 - 3 | Feller (0-3) | 79-62
row 16 : September 16 | Yankees | 10 - 3 | Lemon (19-13) | 79-63
row 17 : September 16 | Yankees | 4 - 3 | Kucks (18-8) | 80-63
row 18 : September 18 | Senators | 1 - 0 | Wiesler (3-12) | 81-63
row 19 : September 18 | Senators | 6 - 0 | Stobbs (15-13) | 82-63
row 20 : September 19 | Senators | 6 - 0 (7) | Abernathy (1-1) | 83-63
row 21 : September 21 | @ Tigers | 5 - 1 | Hoeft (18-13) | 84-63
row 22 : September 22 | @ Tigers | 5 - 1 | Foytack (14-13) | 85-63
row 23 : September 23 | @ Tigers | 11 - 1 | Lemon (20-14) | 85-64
row 24 : September 25 | Athletics | 4 - 1 (10) | Crimian (4-8) | 86-64
row 25 : September 26 | Athletics | 8 - 4 | Ditmar (12-22) | 87-64
row 26 : September 28 | Tigers | 2 - 1 | Hoeft (19-14) | 88-64
row 27 : September 29 | Tigers | 9 - 1 | Houtteman (2-2) | 88-65
row 28 : September 30 | Tigers | 8 - 4 | Feller (0-4) | 88-66 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: Who was the opponent when Hoeft (19-14) took the loss?

Answer: Tigers
[Table] header: Date | Opponent | Score | Loss | Record row 1 : September 1 | @ White Sox | 5 - 1 | Staley (5-2) | 74-53
row 2 : September 2 | @ White Sox | 4 - 3 | Aguirre (2-3) | 74-54
row 3 : September 3 | @ Athletics | 5 - 2 | Garcia (10-12) | 74-55
row 4 : September 3 | @ Athletics | 2 - 1 | Burnette (3-7) | 75-55
row 5 : September 4 | @ Athletics | 5 - 2 | Score (15-9) | 75-56
row 6 : September 7 | White Sox | 2 - 1 | Lemon (18-12) | 75-57
row 7 : September 8 | White Sox | 4 - 2 | Wynn (16-9) | 75-58
row 8 : September 9 | White Sox | 4 - 1 | Donovan (10-8) | 76-58
row 9 : September 9 | White Sox | 6 - 2 | Aguirre (2-4) | 76-59
row 10 : September 11 | Orioles | 3 - 1 | Moore (11-7) | 77-59
row 11 : September 12 | Orioles | 2 - 1 | Brown (9-5) | 78-59
row 12 : September 13 | Orioles | 4 - 1 | Aguirre (2-5) | 78-60
row 13 : September 14 | Red Sox | 10 - 2 | Parnell (7-5) | 79-60
row 14 : September 14 | Red Sox | 4 - 3 | Mossi (6-5) | 79-61
row 15 : September 15 | Red Sox | 5 - 3 | Feller (0-3) | 79-62
row 16 : September 16 | Yankees | 10 - 3 | Lemon (19-13) | 79-63
row 17 : September 16 | Yankees | 4 - 3 | Kucks (18-8) | 80-63
row 18 : September 18 | Senators | 1 - 0 | Wiesler (3-12) | 81-63
row 19 : September 18 | Senators | 6 - 0 | Stobbs (15-13) | 82-63
row 20 : September 19 | Senators | 6 - 0 (7) | Abernathy (1-1) | 83-63
row 21 : September 21 | @ Tigers | 5 - 1 | Hoeft (18-13) | 84-63
row 22 : September 22 | @ Tigers | 5 - 1 | Foytack (14-13) | 85-63
row 23 : September 23 | @ Tigers | 11 - 1 | Lemon (20-14) | 85-64
row 24 : September 25 | Athletics | 4 - 1 (10) | Crimian (4-8) | 86-64
row 25 : September 26 | Athletics | 8 - 4 | Ditmar (12-22) | 87-64
row 26 : September 28 | Tigers | 2 - 1 | Hoeft (19-14) | 88-64
row 27 : September 29 | Tigers | 9 - 1 | Houtteman (2-2) | 88-65
row 28 : September 30 | Tigers | 8 - 4 | Feller (0-4) | 88-66 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What was the score of the game that led to an 80-63 record?

Answer: 4 - 3
[Table] header: Date | Opponent | Score | Loss | Record row 1 : September 1 | @ White Sox | 5 - 1 | Staley (5-2) | 74-53
row 2 : September 2 | @ White Sox | 4 - 3 | Aguirre (2-3) | 74-54
row 3 : September 3 | @ Athletics | 5 - 2 | Garcia (10-12) | 74-55
row 4 : September 3 | @ Athletics | 2 - 1 | Burnette (3-7) | 75-55
row 5 : September 4 | @ Athletics | 5 - 2 | Score (15-9) | 75-56
row 6 : September 7 | White Sox | 2 - 1 | Lemon (18-12) | 75-57
row 7 : September 8 | White Sox | 4 - 2 | Wynn (16-9) | 75-58
row 8 : September 9 | White Sox | 4 - 1 | Donovan (10-8) | 76-58
row 9 : September 9 | White Sox | 6 - 2 | Aguirre (2-4) | 76-59
row 10 : September 11 | Orioles | 3 - 1 | Moore (11-7) | 77-59
row 11 : September 12 | Orioles | 2 - 1 | Brown (9-5) | 78-59
row 12 : September 13 | Orioles | 4 - 1 | Aguirre (2-5) | 78-60
row 13 : September 14 | Red Sox | 10 - 2 | Parnell (7-5) | 79-60
row 14 : September 14 | Red Sox | 4 - 3 | Mossi (6-5) | 79-61
row 15 : September 15 | Red Sox | 5 - 3 | Feller (0-3) | 79-62
row 16 : September 16 | Yankees | 10 - 3 | Lemon (19-13) | 79-63
row 17 : September 16 | Yankees | 4 - 3 | Kucks (18-8) | 80-63
row 18 : September 18 | Senators | 1 - 0 | Wiesler (3-12) | 81-63
row 19 : September 18 | Senators | 6 - 0 | Stobbs (15-13) | 82-63
row 20 : September 19 | Senators | 6 - 0 (7) | Abernathy (1-1) | 83-63
row 21 : September 21 | @ Tigers | 5 - 1 | Hoeft (18-13) | 84-63
row 22 : September 22 | @ Tigers | 5 - 1 | Foytack (14-13) | 85-63
row 23 : September 23 | @ Tigers | 11 - 1 | Lemon (20-14) | 85-64
row 24 : September 25 | Athletics | 4 - 1 (10) | Crimian (4-8) | 86-64
row 25 : September 26 | Athletics | 8 - 4 | Ditmar (12-22) | 87-64
row 26 : September 28 | Tigers | 2 - 1 | Hoeft (19-14) | 88-64
row 27 : September 29 | Tigers | 9 - 1 | Houtteman (2-2) | 88-65
row 28 : September 30 | Tigers | 8 - 4 | Feller (0-4) | 88-66 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: Who was the opponent when Brown (9-5) took the loss?

Answer: Orioles
[Table] header: Date | Episode | Performer 1 | Performer 2 | Performer 3 | Performer 4 row 1 : 18 January 1991 | 1 | Josie Lawrence | Greg Proops | Jim Sweeney | Tony Slattery
row 2 : 25 January 1991 | 2 | Josie Lawrence | Mark Cohen | Tony Slattery | Mike McShane
row 3 : 1 February 1991 | 3 | Mike McShane | Sandi Toksvig | Paul Merton | Jim Sweeney
row 4 : 8 February 1991 | 4 | Josie Lawrence | Paul Merton | Julian Clary | Mike McShane
row 5 : 15 February 1991 | 5 | Mike McShane | Colin Mochrie | Sandi Toksvig | Tony Slattery
row 6 : 22 February 1991 | 6 | Mike McShane | Josie Lawrence | Denalda Williams | Sandi Toksvig
row 7 : 1 March 1991 | 7 | Mike McShane | Paul Merton | Steve Steen | Jim Sweeney
row 8 : 8 March 1991 | 8 | Greg Proops | Sandi Toksvig | Tony Slattery | Mike McShane
row 9 : 15 March 1991 | 9 | London Compilation | London Compilation | London Compilation | London Compilation
row 10 : 22 March 1991 | 10 | Josie Lawrence | Ryan Stiles | Christopher Smith | Jim Meskimen
row 11 : 29 March 1991 | 11 | Mike McShane | Mark Cohen | Greg Proops | John Sessions
row 12 : 5 April 1991 | 12 | Josie Lawrence | Ryan Stiles | Colin Mochrie | Mike McShane
row 13 : 12 April 1991 | 13 | Christopher Smith | Sandi Toksvig | Jim Meskimen | Mike McShane
row 14 : 19 April 1991 | 14 | John Sessions | Archie Hahn | Ryan Stiles | Mike McShane
row 15 : 26 April 1991 | 15 | Greg Proops | George McGrath | Ryan Stiles | Mike McShane
row 16 : 3 May 1991 | 16 | Josie Lawrence | Greg Proops | Sandi Toksvig | Mike McShane
row 17 : 10 May 1991 | 17 | New York Compilation | New York Compilation | New York Compilation | New York Compilation [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What was Performer 1's name who performed with Sandi Toksvig as Performer 3 and Mike McShane as Performer 4?

Answer: Josie Lawrence
[Table] header: Date | Episode | Performer 1 | Performer 2 | Performer 3 | Performer 4 row 1 : 18 January 1991 | 1 | Josie Lawrence | Greg Proops | Jim Sweeney | Tony Slattery
row 2 : 25 January 1991 | 2 | Josie Lawrence | Mark Cohen | Tony Slattery | Mike McShane
row 3 : 1 February 1991 | 3 | Mike McShane | Sandi Toksvig | Paul Merton | Jim Sweeney
row 4 : 8 February 1991 | 4 | Josie Lawrence | Paul Merton | Julian Clary | Mike McShane
row 5 : 15 February 1991 | 5 | Mike McShane | Colin Mochrie | Sandi Toksvig | Tony Slattery
row 6 : 22 February 1991 | 6 | Mike McShane | Josie Lawrence | Denalda Williams | Sandi Toksvig
row 7 : 1 March 1991 | 7 | Mike McShane | Paul Merton | Steve Steen | Jim Sweeney
row 8 : 8 March 1991 | 8 | Greg Proops | Sandi Toksvig | Tony Slattery | Mike McShane
row 9 : 15 March 1991 | 9 | London Compilation | London Compilation | London Compilation | London Compilation
row 10 : 22 March 1991 | 10 | Josie Lawrence | Ryan Stiles | Christopher Smith | Jim Meskimen
row 11 : 29 March 1991 | 11 | Mike McShane | Mark Cohen | Greg Proops | John Sessions
row 12 : 5 April 1991 | 12 | Josie Lawrence | Ryan Stiles | Colin Mochrie | Mike McShane
row 13 : 12 April 1991 | 13 | Christopher Smith | Sandi Toksvig | Jim Meskimen | Mike McShane
row 14 : 19 April 1991 | 14 | John Sessions | Archie Hahn | Ryan Stiles | Mike McShane
row 15 : 26 April 1991 | 15 | Greg Proops | George McGrath | Ryan Stiles | Mike McShane
row 16 : 3 May 1991 | 16 | Josie Lawrence | Greg Proops | Sandi Toksvig | Mike McShane
row 17 : 10 May 1991 | 17 | New York Compilation | New York Compilation | New York Compilation | New York Compilation [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What was Performer 4's name when Performer 3 was Ryan Stiles on episode 14?

Answer: Mike McShane
[Table] header: Game | December | Opponent | Score | Record | Points row 1 : 23 | 1 | @ Ottawa Senators | 1–4 | 14–3–5–1 | 34
row 2 : 24 | 3 | Pittsburgh Penguins | 5–2 | 15–3–5–1 | 36
row 3 : 25 | 5 | Phoenix Coyotes | 3–2 | 16–3–5–1 | 38
row 4 : 26 | 6 | @ Boston Bruins | 1–1 OT | 16–3–6–1 | 39
row 5 : 27 | 8 | @ Montreal Canadiens | 3–2 | 17–3–6–1 | 41
row 6 : 28 | 10 | @ Columbus Blue Jackets | 1–1 OT | 17–3–7–1 | 42
row 7 : 29 | 12 | @ New Jersey Devils | 3–3 OT | 17–3–8–1 | 43
row 8 : 30 | 13 | New Jersey Devils | 0–2 | 17–4–8–1 | 43
row 9 : 31 | 16 | Calgary Flames | 2–3 OT | 17–4–8–2 | 44
row 10 : 32 | 18 | Tampa Bay Lightning | 4–5 OT | 17–4–8–3 | 45
row 11 : 33 | 20 | New York Islanders | 3–1 | 18–4–8–3 | 47
row 12 : 34 | 21 | @ Atlanta Thrashers | 1–4 | 18–5–8–3 | 47
row 13 : 35 | 23 | @ New York Islanders | 2–4 | 18–6–8–3 | 47
row 14 : 36 | 27 | @ Colorado Avalanche | 2–3 OT | 18–6–8–4 | 48
row 15 : 37 | 29 | @ Dallas Stars | 2–2 OT | 18–6–9–4 | 49
row 16 : 38 | 30 | @ St. Louis Blues | 7–2 | 19–6–9–4 | 51 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: How many points have @ new york islanders as the opponent, with a game greater than 35?

Answer: 0.0
[Table] header: Game | December | Opponent | Score | Record | Points row 1 : 23 | 1 | @ Ottawa Senators | 1–4 | 14–3–5–1 | 34
row 2 : 24 | 3 | Pittsburgh Penguins | 5–2 | 15–3–5–1 | 36
row 3 : 25 | 5 | Phoenix Coyotes | 3–2 | 16–3–5–1 | 38
row 4 : 26 | 6 | @ Boston Bruins | 1–1 OT | 16–3–6–1 | 39
row 5 : 27 | 8 | @ Montreal Canadiens | 3–2 | 17–3–6–1 | 41
row 6 : 28 | 10 | @ Columbus Blue Jackets | 1–1 OT | 17–3–7–1 | 42
row 7 : 29 | 12 | @ New Jersey Devils | 3–3 OT | 17–3–8–1 | 43
row 8 : 30 | 13 | New Jersey Devils | 0–2 | 17–4–8–1 | 43
row 9 : 31 | 16 | Calgary Flames | 2–3 OT | 17–4–8–2 | 44
row 10 : 32 | 18 | Tampa Bay Lightning | 4–5 OT | 17–4–8–3 | 45
row 11 : 33 | 20 | New York Islanders | 3–1 | 18–4–8–3 | 47
row 12 : 34 | 21 | @ Atlanta Thrashers | 1–4 | 18–5–8–3 | 47
row 13 : 35 | 23 | @ New York Islanders | 2–4 | 18–6–8–3 | 47
row 14 : 36 | 27 | @ Colorado Avalanche | 2–3 OT | 18–6–8–4 | 48
row 15 : 37 | 29 | @ Dallas Stars | 2–2 OT | 18–6–9–4 | 49
row 16 : 38 | 30 | @ St. Louis Blues | 7–2 | 19–6–9–4 | 51 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What record has a december less than 6, points less than 38, and pittsburgh penguins as the opponent?

Answer: 15–3–5–1
[Table] header: County | Per capita income | Median household income | Median family income | Population | Number of households row 1 : Rockingham | $37,422 | $77,470 | $92,835 | 295,223 | 115,033
row 2 : Hillsborough | $33,653 | $70,591 | $83,636 | 400,721 | 155,466
row 3 : New Hampshire | $32,357 | $64,664 | $78,310 | 1,316,470 | 518,973
row 4 : Merrimack | $31,403 | $65,722 | $78,998 | 146,445 | 57,069
row 5 : Belknap | $29,449 | $56,921 | $67,768 | 60,088 | 24,766
row 6 : Strafford | $29,405 | $59,082 | $74,319 | 123,143 | 47,100
row 7 : Carroll | $29,194 | $50,555 | $60,530 | 47,818 | 21,052
row 8 : Grafton | $29,090 | $53,000 | $66,701 | 89,118 | 35,986
row 9 : United States | $27,915 | $52,762 | $64,293 | 308,745,538 | 116,716,292
row 10 : Cheshire | $27,459 | $55,241 | $69,203 | 77,117 | 30,204
row 11 : Sullivan | $27,223 | $51,678 | $63,682 | 43,742 | 18,126
row 12 : Coos | $23,580 | $41,087 | $52,676 | 33,055 | 14,171 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: When the county is Carroll what is the lowest population?

Answer: 47818.0
[Table] header: County | Per capita income | Median household income | Median family income | Population | Number of households row 1 : Rockingham | $37,422 | $77,470 | $92,835 | 295,223 | 115,033
row 2 : Hillsborough | $33,653 | $70,591 | $83,636 | 400,721 | 155,466
row 3 : New Hampshire | $32,357 | $64,664 | $78,310 | 1,316,470 | 518,973
row 4 : Merrimack | $31,403 | $65,722 | $78,998 | 146,445 | 57,069
row 5 : Belknap | $29,449 | $56,921 | $67,768 | 60,088 | 24,766
row 6 : Strafford | $29,405 | $59,082 | $74,319 | 123,143 | 47,100
row 7 : Carroll | $29,194 | $50,555 | $60,530 | 47,818 | 21,052
row 8 : Grafton | $29,090 | $53,000 | $66,701 | 89,118 | 35,986
row 9 : United States | $27,915 | $52,762 | $64,293 | 308,745,538 | 116,716,292
row 10 : Cheshire | $27,459 | $55,241 | $69,203 | 77,117 | 30,204
row 11 : Sullivan | $27,223 | $51,678 | $63,682 | 43,742 | 18,126
row 12 : Coos | $23,580 | $41,087 | $52,676 | 33,055 | 14,171 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: When the Per capita income is $29,194, what is the average population?

Answer: 47818.0
[Table] header: County | Per capita income | Median household income | Median family income | Population | Number of households row 1 : Rockingham | $37,422 | $77,470 | $92,835 | 295,223 | 115,033
row 2 : Hillsborough | $33,653 | $70,591 | $83,636 | 400,721 | 155,466
row 3 : New Hampshire | $32,357 | $64,664 | $78,310 | 1,316,470 | 518,973
row 4 : Merrimack | $31,403 | $65,722 | $78,998 | 146,445 | 57,069
row 5 : Belknap | $29,449 | $56,921 | $67,768 | 60,088 | 24,766
row 6 : Strafford | $29,405 | $59,082 | $74,319 | 123,143 | 47,100
row 7 : Carroll | $29,194 | $50,555 | $60,530 | 47,818 | 21,052
row 8 : Grafton | $29,090 | $53,000 | $66,701 | 89,118 | 35,986
row 9 : United States | $27,915 | $52,762 | $64,293 | 308,745,538 | 116,716,292
row 10 : Cheshire | $27,459 | $55,241 | $69,203 | 77,117 | 30,204
row 11 : Sullivan | $27,223 | $51,678 | $63,682 | 43,742 | 18,126
row 12 : Coos | $23,580 | $41,087 | $52,676 | 33,055 | 14,171 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: When the population is greater than 146,445 in the county of Carroll, what is the number of households?

Answer: none
[Table] header: Gauge | Railway | Class | Works no. | Year | Builder row 1 : 3 ft 6 in | Rhodesia Railways | 15th | 6936–6939 | 1940 | Beyer, Peacock
row 2 : 3 ft 6 in | Rhodesia Railways | 15th | 7228–7237 | 1947 | Beyer, Peacock
row 3 : 3 ft 6 in | Rhodesia Railways | 15th | 7260–7279 | 1948–49 | Beyer, Peacock
row 4 : 3 ft 6 in | Rhodesia Railways | 15A | 7326–7340 | 1949–50 | Beyer, Peacock
row 5 : 3 ft 6 in | Rhodesia Railways | 15A | 7351–7365 | 1950 | Beyer, Peacock
row 6 : 3 ft 6 in | Rhodesia Railways | 15A | 2963–2972 | 1952 | Franco-Belge , France
row 7 : 3 ft 6 in | Sudan Railways | 250 | 6798–6801 | 1936 | Beyer, Peacock
row 8 : 3 ft 6 in | Sudan Railways | 250 | 6870–6875 | 1937 | Beyer, Peacock [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: Which year has a railway class of 250?

Answer: 1936, 1937
[Table] header: Gauge | Railway | Class | Works no. | Year | Builder row 1 : 3 ft 6 in | Rhodesia Railways | 15th | 6936–6939 | 1940 | Beyer, Peacock
row 2 : 3 ft 6 in | Rhodesia Railways | 15th | 7228–7237 | 1947 | Beyer, Peacock
row 3 : 3 ft 6 in | Rhodesia Railways | 15th | 7260–7279 | 1948–49 | Beyer, Peacock
row 4 : 3 ft 6 in | Rhodesia Railways | 15A | 7326–7340 | 1949–50 | Beyer, Peacock
row 5 : 3 ft 6 in | Rhodesia Railways | 15A | 7351–7365 | 1950 | Beyer, Peacock
row 6 : 3 ft 6 in | Rhodesia Railways | 15A | 2963–2972 | 1952 | Franco-Belge , France
row 7 : 3 ft 6 in | Sudan Railways | 250 | 6798–6801 | 1936 | Beyer, Peacock
row 8 : 3 ft 6 in | Sudan Railways | 250 | 6870–6875 | 1937 | Beyer, Peacock [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: Which works number has a class of 15th and year of 1940?

Answer: 6936–6939
[Table] header: Gauge | Railway | Class | Works no. | Year | Builder row 1 : 3 ft 6 in | Rhodesia Railways | 15th | 6936–6939 | 1940 | Beyer, Peacock
row 2 : 3 ft 6 in | Rhodesia Railways | 15th | 7228–7237 | 1947 | Beyer, Peacock
row 3 : 3 ft 6 in | Rhodesia Railways | 15th | 7260–7279 | 1948–49 | Beyer, Peacock
row 4 : 3 ft 6 in | Rhodesia Railways | 15A | 7326–7340 | 1949–50 | Beyer, Peacock
row 5 : 3 ft 6 in | Rhodesia Railways | 15A | 7351–7365 | 1950 | Beyer, Peacock
row 6 : 3 ft 6 in | Rhodesia Railways | 15A | 2963–2972 | 1952 | Franco-Belge , France
row 7 : 3 ft 6 in | Sudan Railways | 250 | 6798–6801 | 1936 | Beyer, Peacock
row 8 : 3 ft 6 in | Sudan Railways | 250 | 6870–6875 | 1937 | Beyer, Peacock [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: Which builder has a railway of Rhodesia Railways?

Answer: Beyer, Peacock, Beyer, Peacock, Beyer, Peacock, Beyer, Peacock, Beyer, Peacock, Franco-Belge , France
[Table] header: Gauge | Railway | Class | Works no. | Year | Builder row 1 : 3 ft 6 in | Rhodesia Railways | 15th | 6936–6939 | 1940 | Beyer, Peacock
row 2 : 3 ft 6 in | Rhodesia Railways | 15th | 7228–7237 | 1947 | Beyer, Peacock
row 3 : 3 ft 6 in | Rhodesia Railways | 15th | 7260–7279 | 1948–49 | Beyer, Peacock
row 4 : 3 ft 6 in | Rhodesia Railways | 15A | 7326–7340 | 1949–50 | Beyer, Peacock
row 5 : 3 ft 6 in | Rhodesia Railways | 15A | 7351–7365 | 1950 | Beyer, Peacock
row 6 : 3 ft 6 in | Rhodesia Railways | 15A | 2963–2972 | 1952 | Franco-Belge , France
row 7 : 3 ft 6 in | Sudan Railways | 250 | 6798–6801 | 1936 | Beyer, Peacock
row 8 : 3 ft 6 in | Sudan Railways | 250 | 6870–6875 | 1937 | Beyer, Peacock [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: Which railway has a class of 250 and year 1936?

Answer: Sudan Railways
[Table] header: Week | Date | Opponent | Result | Venue | Attendance row 1 : 1 | September 9, 1990 | Los Angeles Rams | W 36-24 | Lambeau Field | 57,685
row 2 : 2 | September 16, 1990 | Chicago Bears | L 31-13 | Lambeau Field | 58,938
row 3 : 3 | September 23, 1990 | Kansas City Chiefs | L 17-3 | Lambeau Field | 58,817
row 4 : 4 | September 30, 1990 | at Detroit Lions | W 24-21 | Pontiac Silverdome | 64,509
row 5 : 5 | October 7, 1990 | at Chicago Bears | L 27-13 | Soldier Field | 59,929
row 6 : 6 | October 14, 1990 | at Tampa Bay Buccaneers | L 26-14 | Tampa Stadium | 67,472
row 7 : 7 | Bye | Bye | Bye | Bye | Bye
row 8 : 8 | October 28, 1990 | Minnesota Vikings | W 24-10 | Milwaukee County Stadium | 55,125
row 9 : 9 | November 4, 1990 | San Francisco 49ers | L 24-20 | Lambeau Field | 58,835
row 10 : 10 | November 11, 1990 | at Los Angeles Raiders | W 29-16 | Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum | 50,855
row 11 : 11 | November 18, 1990 | at Phoenix Cardinals | W 24-21 | Sun Devil Stadium | 46,878
row 12 : 12 | November 25, 1990 | Tampa Bay Buccaneers | W 20-10 | Milwaukee County Stadium | 53,677
row 13 : 13 | December 2, 1990 | at Minnesota Vikings | L 23-7 | Hubert H. Humphrey Metrodom | 62,058
row 14 : 14 | December 9, 1990 | Seattle Seahawks | L 20-14 | Milwaukee County Stadium | 52,015
row 15 : 15 | December 16, 1990 | at Philadelphia Eagles | L 31-0 | Veterans Stadium | 65,627
row 16 : 16 | December 22, 1990 | Detroit Lions | L 24-17 | Lambeau Field | 46,700
row 17 : 17 | December 30, 1990 | at Denver Broncos | L 22-13 | Mile High Stadium | 46,943 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: which week had an attendance of 53,677?

Answer: 1.0
[Table] header: Week | Date | Opponent | Result | Venue | Attendance row 1 : 1 | September 9, 1990 | Los Angeles Rams | W 36-24 | Lambeau Field | 57,685
row 2 : 2 | September 16, 1990 | Chicago Bears | L 31-13 | Lambeau Field | 58,938
row 3 : 3 | September 23, 1990 | Kansas City Chiefs | L 17-3 | Lambeau Field | 58,817
row 4 : 4 | September 30, 1990 | at Detroit Lions | W 24-21 | Pontiac Silverdome | 64,509
row 5 : 5 | October 7, 1990 | at Chicago Bears | L 27-13 | Soldier Field | 59,929
row 6 : 6 | October 14, 1990 | at Tampa Bay Buccaneers | L 26-14 | Tampa Stadium | 67,472
row 7 : 7 | Bye | Bye | Bye | Bye | Bye
row 8 : 8 | October 28, 1990 | Minnesota Vikings | W 24-10 | Milwaukee County Stadium | 55,125
row 9 : 9 | November 4, 1990 | San Francisco 49ers | L 24-20 | Lambeau Field | 58,835
row 10 : 10 | November 11, 1990 | at Los Angeles Raiders | W 29-16 | Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum | 50,855
row 11 : 11 | November 18, 1990 | at Phoenix Cardinals | W 24-21 | Sun Devil Stadium | 46,878
row 12 : 12 | November 25, 1990 | Tampa Bay Buccaneers | W 20-10 | Milwaukee County Stadium | 53,677
row 13 : 13 | December 2, 1990 | at Minnesota Vikings | L 23-7 | Hubert H. Humphrey Metrodom | 62,058
row 14 : 14 | December 9, 1990 | Seattle Seahawks | L 20-14 | Milwaukee County Stadium | 52,015
row 15 : 15 | December 16, 1990 | at Philadelphia Eagles | L 31-0 | Veterans Stadium | 65,627
row 16 : 16 | December 22, 1990 | Detroit Lions | L 24-17 | Lambeau Field | 46,700
row 17 : 17 | December 30, 1990 | at Denver Broncos | L 22-13 | Mile High Stadium | 46,943 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: which team had a bye week?

Answer: Bye
[Table] header: Game # | Date | Visitor | Score | Home | Record | Points row 1 : 65 | March 1 | Los Angeles | 5 - 4 | Buffalo | 33-26-6 | 72
row 2 : 66 | March 2 | Los Angeles | 4 - 6 | St. Louis | 33-27-6 | 72
row 3 : 67 | March 4 | Philadelphia | 6 - 2 | Los Angeles | 34-27-6 | 74
row 4 : 68 | March 7 | Pittsburgh | 3 - 2 | Los Angeles | 35-27-6 | 76
row 5 : 69 | March 10 | Los Angeles | 2 - 4 | Vancouver | 35-28-6 | 76
row 6 : 70 | March 12 | Los Angeles | 6 - 3 | Edmonton | 36-28-6 | 78
row 7 : 71 | March 14 | Los Angeles | 4 - 0 | Quebec | 37-28-6 | 80
row 8 : 72 | March 15 | Los Angeles | 2 - 5 | Montreal | 37-29-6 | 80
row 9 : 73 | March 18 | Calgary | 3 - 9 | Los Angeles | 37-30-6 | 80
row 10 : 74 | March 21 | Los Angeles | 4 - 3 | Edmonton | 38-30-6 | 82
row 11 : 75 | March 23 | Los Angeles | 2 - 4 | Calgary | 38-31-6 | 82
row 12 : 76 | March 25 | Edmonton | 4 - 2 | Los Angeles | 39-31-6 | 84
row 13 : 77 | March 28 | Winnipeg | 3 - 3 | Los Angeles | 39-31-7 | 85
row 14 : 78 | March 29 | Winnipeg | 2 - 1 | Los Angeles | 40-31-7 | 87 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: Which Date has Points smaller than 85 and a Game # of 74?

Answer: March 21
[Table] header: Game # | Date | Visitor | Score | Home | Record | Points row 1 : 65 | March 1 | Los Angeles | 5 - 4 | Buffalo | 33-26-6 | 72
row 2 : 66 | March 2 | Los Angeles | 4 - 6 | St. Louis | 33-27-6 | 72
row 3 : 67 | March 4 | Philadelphia | 6 - 2 | Los Angeles | 34-27-6 | 74
row 4 : 68 | March 7 | Pittsburgh | 3 - 2 | Los Angeles | 35-27-6 | 76
row 5 : 69 | March 10 | Los Angeles | 2 - 4 | Vancouver | 35-28-6 | 76
row 6 : 70 | March 12 | Los Angeles | 6 - 3 | Edmonton | 36-28-6 | 78
row 7 : 71 | March 14 | Los Angeles | 4 - 0 | Quebec | 37-28-6 | 80
row 8 : 72 | March 15 | Los Angeles | 2 - 5 | Montreal | 37-29-6 | 80
row 9 : 73 | March 18 | Calgary | 3 - 9 | Los Angeles | 37-30-6 | 80
row 10 : 74 | March 21 | Los Angeles | 4 - 3 | Edmonton | 38-30-6 | 82
row 11 : 75 | March 23 | Los Angeles | 2 - 4 | Calgary | 38-31-6 | 82
row 12 : 76 | March 25 | Edmonton | 4 - 2 | Los Angeles | 39-31-6 | 84
row 13 : 77 | March 28 | Winnipeg | 3 - 3 | Los Angeles | 39-31-7 | 85
row 14 : 78 | March 29 | Winnipeg | 2 - 1 | Los Angeles | 40-31-7 | 87 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What is listed for Vistor that has a Game # that is smaller than 67 and has a Home listed as Buffalo?

Answer: Los Angeles
[Table] header: Game # | Date | Visitor | Score | Home | Record | Points row 1 : 65 | March 1 | Los Angeles | 5 - 4 | Buffalo | 33-26-6 | 72
row 2 : 66 | March 2 | Los Angeles | 4 - 6 | St. Louis | 33-27-6 | 72
row 3 : 67 | March 4 | Philadelphia | 6 - 2 | Los Angeles | 34-27-6 | 74
row 4 : 68 | March 7 | Pittsburgh | 3 - 2 | Los Angeles | 35-27-6 | 76
row 5 : 69 | March 10 | Los Angeles | 2 - 4 | Vancouver | 35-28-6 | 76
row 6 : 70 | March 12 | Los Angeles | 6 - 3 | Edmonton | 36-28-6 | 78
row 7 : 71 | March 14 | Los Angeles | 4 - 0 | Quebec | 37-28-6 | 80
row 8 : 72 | March 15 | Los Angeles | 2 - 5 | Montreal | 37-29-6 | 80
row 9 : 73 | March 18 | Calgary | 3 - 9 | Los Angeles | 37-30-6 | 80
row 10 : 74 | March 21 | Los Angeles | 4 - 3 | Edmonton | 38-30-6 | 82
row 11 : 75 | March 23 | Los Angeles | 2 - 4 | Calgary | 38-31-6 | 82
row 12 : 76 | March 25 | Edmonton | 4 - 2 | Los Angeles | 39-31-6 | 84
row 13 : 77 | March 28 | Winnipeg | 3 - 3 | Los Angeles | 39-31-7 | 85
row 14 : 78 | March 29 | Winnipeg | 2 - 1 | Los Angeles | 40-31-7 | 87 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What Date has a Home listed as Calgary?

Answer: March 23
[Table] header: Game # | Date | Visitor | Score | Home | Record | Points row 1 : 65 | March 1 | Los Angeles | 5 - 4 | Buffalo | 33-26-6 | 72
row 2 : 66 | March 2 | Los Angeles | 4 - 6 | St. Louis | 33-27-6 | 72
row 3 : 67 | March 4 | Philadelphia | 6 - 2 | Los Angeles | 34-27-6 | 74
row 4 : 68 | March 7 | Pittsburgh | 3 - 2 | Los Angeles | 35-27-6 | 76
row 5 : 69 | March 10 | Los Angeles | 2 - 4 | Vancouver | 35-28-6 | 76
row 6 : 70 | March 12 | Los Angeles | 6 - 3 | Edmonton | 36-28-6 | 78
row 7 : 71 | March 14 | Los Angeles | 4 - 0 | Quebec | 37-28-6 | 80
row 8 : 72 | March 15 | Los Angeles | 2 - 5 | Montreal | 37-29-6 | 80
row 9 : 73 | March 18 | Calgary | 3 - 9 | Los Angeles | 37-30-6 | 80
row 10 : 74 | March 21 | Los Angeles | 4 - 3 | Edmonton | 38-30-6 | 82
row 11 : 75 | March 23 | Los Angeles | 2 - 4 | Calgary | 38-31-6 | 82
row 12 : 76 | March 25 | Edmonton | 4 - 2 | Los Angeles | 39-31-6 | 84
row 13 : 77 | March 28 | Winnipeg | 3 - 3 | Los Angeles | 39-31-7 | 85
row 14 : 78 | March 29 | Winnipeg | 2 - 1 | Los Angeles | 40-31-7 | 87 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What Score has a Record of 35-28-6?

Answer: 2 - 4
[Table] header: Game # | Date | Visitor | Score | Home | Record | Points row 1 : 65 | March 1 | Los Angeles | 5 - 4 | Buffalo | 33-26-6 | 72
row 2 : 66 | March 2 | Los Angeles | 4 - 6 | St. Louis | 33-27-6 | 72
row 3 : 67 | March 4 | Philadelphia | 6 - 2 | Los Angeles | 34-27-6 | 74
row 4 : 68 | March 7 | Pittsburgh | 3 - 2 | Los Angeles | 35-27-6 | 76
row 5 : 69 | March 10 | Los Angeles | 2 - 4 | Vancouver | 35-28-6 | 76
row 6 : 70 | March 12 | Los Angeles | 6 - 3 | Edmonton | 36-28-6 | 78
row 7 : 71 | March 14 | Los Angeles | 4 - 0 | Quebec | 37-28-6 | 80
row 8 : 72 | March 15 | Los Angeles | 2 - 5 | Montreal | 37-29-6 | 80
row 9 : 73 | March 18 | Calgary | 3 - 9 | Los Angeles | 37-30-6 | 80
row 10 : 74 | March 21 | Los Angeles | 4 - 3 | Edmonton | 38-30-6 | 82
row 11 : 75 | March 23 | Los Angeles | 2 - 4 | Calgary | 38-31-6 | 82
row 12 : 76 | March 25 | Edmonton | 4 - 2 | Los Angeles | 39-31-6 | 84
row 13 : 77 | March 28 | Winnipeg | 3 - 3 | Los Angeles | 39-31-7 | 85
row 14 : 78 | March 29 | Winnipeg | 2 - 1 | Los Angeles | 40-31-7 | 87 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What Date has Points smaller than 80, Home of Los Angeles, and a Visitor of Pittsburgh?

Answer: March 7
[Table] header: Model | Engine | Displacement | Power | Torque row 1 : 70 | I4 | 1,301 cc | 48kW (65 PS) @ 5600  | N·m (lb·ft)
row 2 : 70 | I4 | 1,301 cc | 50kW (68 PS) @ 5700  | N·m (lb·ft)
row 3 : 1.4 S | I4 | 1,372 cc | 46kW (63 PS) @ 5800  | N·m (lb·ft)
row 4 : 75 ie | I4 | 1,498 cc | 55kW (75 PS) @ 5800  | 108 Nm @ 3,000 rpm
row 5 : 85, 1.5 S/SC | I4 | 1,498 cc | 58kW (79 PS) @ 5500 | N·m (lb·ft)
row 6 : 1.6 S/SC | I4 | 1,581 cc | 64kW (87 PS) @ 6000  | N·m (lb·ft)
row 7 : 90i | I4 | 1,585 cc | 66kW (90 PS) @ 6250 | N·m (lb·ft)
row 8 : 100 S | I4 | 1,585 cc | 74kW (100 PS) @ 5900 | N·m (lb·ft)
row 9 : 100i | I4 | 1,585 cc | 74kW (100 PS) @ 6000 | N·m (lb·ft)
row 10 : 2000 Twincam | I4 | 1,995 cc | 81kW (110 PS) @ 5000 | N·m (lb·ft) [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What was the displacement having a torque of n·m (lb·ft) @ 3000 rpm?

Answer: none
[Table] header: Model | Engine | Displacement | Power | Torque row 1 : 70 | I4 | 1,301 cc | 48kW (65 PS) @ 5600  | N·m (lb·ft)
row 2 : 70 | I4 | 1,301 cc | 50kW (68 PS) @ 5700  | N·m (lb·ft)
row 3 : 1.4 S | I4 | 1,372 cc | 46kW (63 PS) @ 5800  | N·m (lb·ft)
row 4 : 75 ie | I4 | 1,498 cc | 55kW (75 PS) @ 5800  | 108 Nm @ 3,000 rpm
row 5 : 85, 1.5 S/SC | I4 | 1,498 cc | 58kW (79 PS) @ 5500 | N·m (lb·ft)
row 6 : 1.6 S/SC | I4 | 1,581 cc | 64kW (87 PS) @ 6000  | N·m (lb·ft)
row 7 : 90i | I4 | 1,585 cc | 66kW (90 PS) @ 6250 | N·m (lb·ft)
row 8 : 100 S | I4 | 1,585 cc | 74kW (100 PS) @ 5900 | N·m (lb·ft)
row 9 : 100i | I4 | 1,585 cc | 74kW (100 PS) @ 6000 | N·m (lb·ft)
row 10 : 2000 Twincam | I4 | 1,995 cc | 81kW (110 PS) @ 5000 | N·m (lb·ft) [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: Which engine had a 48kw (65 ps) @ 5600 rpm power?

Answer: none
[Table] header: Model | Engine | Displacement | Power | Torque row 1 : 70 | I4 | 1,301 cc | 48kW (65 PS) @ 5600  | N·m (lb·ft)
row 2 : 70 | I4 | 1,301 cc | 50kW (68 PS) @ 5700  | N·m (lb·ft)
row 3 : 1.4 S | I4 | 1,372 cc | 46kW (63 PS) @ 5800  | N·m (lb·ft)
row 4 : 75 ie | I4 | 1,498 cc | 55kW (75 PS) @ 5800  | 108 Nm @ 3,000 rpm
row 5 : 85, 1.5 S/SC | I4 | 1,498 cc | 58kW (79 PS) @ 5500 | N·m (lb·ft)
row 6 : 1.6 S/SC | I4 | 1,581 cc | 64kW (87 PS) @ 6000  | N·m (lb·ft)
row 7 : 90i | I4 | 1,585 cc | 66kW (90 PS) @ 6250 | N·m (lb·ft)
row 8 : 100 S | I4 | 1,585 cc | 74kW (100 PS) @ 5900 | N·m (lb·ft)
row 9 : 100i | I4 | 1,585 cc | 74kW (100 PS) @ 6000 | N·m (lb·ft)
row 10 : 2000 Twincam | I4 | 1,995 cc | 81kW (110 PS) @ 5000 | N·m (lb·ft) [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: Which model had a power of 66kw (90 ps) @ 6250 rpm?

Answer: none
[Table] header: Model | Engine | Displacement | Power | Torque row 1 : 70 | I4 | 1,301 cc | 48kW (65 PS) @ 5600  | N·m (lb·ft)
row 2 : 70 | I4 | 1,301 cc | 50kW (68 PS) @ 5700  | N·m (lb·ft)
row 3 : 1.4 S | I4 | 1,372 cc | 46kW (63 PS) @ 5800  | N·m (lb·ft)
row 4 : 75 ie | I4 | 1,498 cc | 55kW (75 PS) @ 5800  | 108 Nm @ 3,000 rpm
row 5 : 85, 1.5 S/SC | I4 | 1,498 cc | 58kW (79 PS) @ 5500 | N·m (lb·ft)
row 6 : 1.6 S/SC | I4 | 1,581 cc | 64kW (87 PS) @ 6000  | N·m (lb·ft)
row 7 : 90i | I4 | 1,585 cc | 66kW (90 PS) @ 6250 | N·m (lb·ft)
row 8 : 100 S | I4 | 1,585 cc | 74kW (100 PS) @ 5900 | N·m (lb·ft)
row 9 : 100i | I4 | 1,585 cc | 74kW (100 PS) @ 6000 | N·m (lb·ft)
row 10 : 2000 Twincam | I4 | 1,995 cc | 81kW (110 PS) @ 5000 | N·m (lb·ft) [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: Which of the engines has a displacement of 1,585 cc, with a model number of 90i?

Answer: I4
[Table] header: Week | Date | Opponent | Result | Venue | Attendance row 1 : 1 | September 17, 1961 | Detroit Lions | L 17-13 | Milwaukee County Stadium | 44,307
row 2 : 2 | September 24, 1961 | San Francisco 49ers | W 30-10 | City Stadium | 38,669
row 3 : 3 | October 1, 1961 | Chicago Bears | W 24-0 | City Stadium | 38,669
row 4 : 4 | October 8, 1961 | Baltimore Colts | W 45-7 | City Stadium | 38,669
row 5 : 5 | October 15, 1961 | at Cleveland Browns | W 49-17 | Cleveland Stadium | 75,042
row 6 : 6 | October 22, 1961 | at Minnesota Vikings | W 33-7 | Metropolitan Stadium | 42,007
row 7 : 7 | October 29, 1961 | Minnesota Vikings | W 28-10 | Milwaukee County Stadium | 44,112
row 8 : 8 | November 5, 1961 | at Baltimore Colts | L 45-21 | Memorial Stadium | 57,641
row 9 : 9 | November 12, 1961 | at Chicago Bears | W 31-28 | Wrigley Field | 49,711
row 10 : 10 | November 19, 1961 | Los Angeles Rams | W 35-17 | City Stadium | 38,669
row 11 : 11 | November 23, 1961 | at Detroit Lions | W 17-9 | Tiger Stadium | 55,662
row 12 : 12 | December 3, 1961 | New York Giants | W 20-17 | Milwaukee County Stadium | 47,012
row 13 : 13 | December 10, 1961 | at San Francisco 49ers | L 22-21 | Kezar Stadium | 55,722
row 14 : 14 | December 17, 1961 | at Los Angeles Rams | W 24-17 | Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum | 49,169 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: Who was the opponent at memorial stadium?

Answer: at Baltimore Colts
[Table] header: Pos. | Player | Team | Height | Weight | First round | Final round row 1 : G | Jeff Hornacek | Utah Jazz | 6–4 | 190 | 17 | 13
row 2 : F | Dirk Nowitzki | Dallas Mavericks | 7–0 | 245 | 18 | 11
row 3 : G | Ray Allen | Milwaukee Bucks | 6–5 | 205 | 16 | 10
row 4 : G | Mike Bibby | Vancouver Grizzlies | 6–2 | 195 | 15 | —
row 5 : G | Terry Porter | San Antonio Spurs | 6–3 | 195 | 15 | —
row 6 : G | Hubert Davis | Dallas Mavericks | 6–5 | 183 | 14 | —
row 7 : G | Allen Iverson | Philadelphia 76ers | 6–0 | 165 | 10 | —
row 8 : G | Bob Sura | Cleveland Cavaliers | 6–5 | 200 | 9 | — [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: Which Height has a Player of mike bibby?

Answer: 6–2
[Table] header: Pos. | Player | Team | Height | Weight | First round | Final round row 1 : G | Jeff Hornacek | Utah Jazz | 6–4 | 190 | 17 | 13
row 2 : F | Dirk Nowitzki | Dallas Mavericks | 7–0 | 245 | 18 | 11
row 3 : G | Ray Allen | Milwaukee Bucks | 6–5 | 205 | 16 | 10
row 4 : G | Mike Bibby | Vancouver Grizzlies | 6–2 | 195 | 15 | —
row 5 : G | Terry Porter | San Antonio Spurs | 6–3 | 195 | 15 | —
row 6 : G | Hubert Davis | Dallas Mavericks | 6–5 | 183 | 14 | —
row 7 : G | Allen Iverson | Philadelphia 76ers | 6–0 | 165 | 10 | —
row 8 : G | Bob Sura | Cleveland Cavaliers | 6–5 | 200 | 9 | — [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: Which Pos has a First round smaller than 10?

Answer: G
[Table] header: Year | League | Wins | Losses | Draws | Points row 1 : 1997 | W-League | 5 | 5 | 1 | 15
row 2 : 1998 | W-2 (W-League) | 5 | 7 | 2 | 17
row 3 : 1999 | W-2 (W-League) | 8 | 4 | 0 | 39
row 4 : 2000 | W-2 (W-League) | 9 | 2 | 1 | 43
row 5 : 2001 | W-2 (W-League) | 4 | 7 | 1 | 18 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: How many points have a loss less than 5, and 0 for draws?

Answer: 1.0
[Table] header: Year | League | Wins | Losses | Draws | Points row 1 : 1997 | W-League | 5 | 5 | 1 | 15
row 2 : 1998 | W-2 (W-League) | 5 | 7 | 2 | 17
row 3 : 1999 | W-2 (W-League) | 8 | 4 | 0 | 39
row 4 : 2000 | W-2 (W-League) | 9 | 2 | 1 | 43
row 5 : 2001 | W-2 (W-League) | 4 | 7 | 1 | 18 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What is the lowest points that has w-2 (w-league) as the league, and draws greater than 2?

Answer: none
[Table] header: Year | League | Wins | Losses | Draws | Points row 1 : 1997 | W-League | 5 | 5 | 1 | 15
row 2 : 1998 | W-2 (W-League) | 5 | 7 | 2 | 17
row 3 : 1999 | W-2 (W-League) | 8 | 4 | 0 | 39
row 4 : 2000 | W-2 (W-League) | 9 | 2 | 1 | 43
row 5 : 2001 | W-2 (W-League) | 4 | 7 | 1 | 18 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What is the lowest wins that has a year prior to 1999, with draws greater than 1, and points greater than 17?

Answer: none
[Table] header: Year | League | Wins | Losses | Draws | Points row 1 : 1997 | W-League | 5 | 5 | 1 | 15
row 2 : 1998 | W-2 (W-League) | 5 | 7 | 2 | 17
row 3 : 1999 | W-2 (W-League) | 8 | 4 | 0 | 39
row 4 : 2000 | W-2 (W-League) | 9 | 2 | 1 | 43
row 5 : 2001 | W-2 (W-League) | 4 | 7 | 1 | 18 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: How many losses have a year later than 2001?

Answer: none
[Table] header: CERCLIS ID | Name | County | Proposed | Listed | Construction completed | Partially deleted | Deleted row 1 : IND000715490 | Conrail Rail Yard (Elkhart) | Elkhart | 06/24/1988 | 08/30/1990 | 07/12/2004 | N/A | N/A
row 2 : IND980500292 | Himco Dump | Elkhart | 06/24/1988 | 02/21/1990 | N/A | N/A | N/A
row 3 : IND016360265 | American Chemical Service, Inc. | Lake | 09/08/1983 | 09/21/1984 | 09/27/2004 | N/A | N/A
row 4 : IND016395899 | Carter Lee Lumber Co. | Marion | 06/24/1988 | 03/31/1989 | 09/29/1995 | N/A | 07/09/1996
row 5 : IND006418651 | Bennett Stone Quarry | Monroe | 09/08/1983 | 09/21/1984 | 09/25/2000 | N/A | N/A
row 6 : IND980794341 | Lemon Lane Landfill | Monroe | 12/30/1982 | 09/08/1983 | N/A | N/A | N/A
row 7 : IND980614556 | Neal's Landfill (Bloomington | Monroe | 12/30/1982 | 09/08/1983 | N/A | N/A | N/A [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: Which county includes Himco Dump?

Answer: Elkhart
[Table] header: Games | Drawn | Lost | Points difference | Points row 1 : 5 | 0 | 0 | 62 - 10 | 10
row 2 : 5 | 0 | 2 | 25 - 28 | 6
row 3 : 5 | 1 | 2 | 24 - 26 | 5
row 4 : 5 | 0 | 3 | 18 - 33 | 4
row 5 : 5 | 0 | 3 | 17 - 24 | 4
row 6 : 5 | 1 | 4 | 18 - 43 | 1 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: Drawn of 0, and a Games larger than 5 has what amount of highest points?

Answer: none
[Table] header: Games | Drawn | Lost | Points difference | Points row 1 : 5 | 0 | 0 | 62 - 10 | 10
row 2 : 5 | 0 | 2 | 25 - 28 | 6
row 3 : 5 | 1 | 2 | 24 - 26 | 5
row 4 : 5 | 0 | 3 | 18 - 33 | 4
row 5 : 5 | 0 | 3 | 17 - 24 | 4
row 6 : 5 | 1 | 4 | 18 - 43 | 1 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: Lost larger than 4 is what highest drawn?

Answer: none
[Table] header: Games | Drawn | Lost | Points difference | Points row 1 : 5 | 0 | 0 | 62 - 10 | 10
row 2 : 5 | 0 | 2 | 25 - 28 | 6
row 3 : 5 | 1 | 2 | 24 - 26 | 5
row 4 : 5 | 0 | 3 | 18 - 33 | 4
row 5 : 5 | 0 | 3 | 17 - 24 | 4
row 6 : 5 | 1 | 4 | 18 - 43 | 1 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: Points difference of 18 - 33, and a Points smaller than 4 is the total of what sum of games?

Answer: none
[Table] header: Date | Visitor | Score | Home | Record | Points row 1 : November 1 | Minnesota | 3–6 | Pittsburgh | 2–4–3 | 7
row 2 : November 2 | Pittsburgh | 3–4 | Detroit | 2–5–3 | 7
row 3 : November 5 | Detroit | 4–2 | Pittsburgh | 2–6–3 | 7
row 4 : November 8 | Chicago | 4–1 | Pittsburgh | 2–7–3 | 7
row 5 : November 12 | Pittsburgh | 3–0 | Toronto | 3–7–3 | 9
row 6 : November 13 | Pittsburgh | 0–4 | St. Louis | 3–8–3 | 9
row 7 : November 15 | Los Angeles | 1–3 | Pittsburgh | 4–8–3 | 11
row 8 : November 19 | St. Louis | 4–0 | Pittsburgh | 4–9–3 | 11
row 9 : November 22 | Philadelphia | 3–5 | Pittsburgh | 5–9–3 | 13
row 10 : November 23 | Pittsburgh | 2–3 | Chicago | 5–10–3 | 13
row 11 : November 26 | Pittsburgh | 4–4 | Minnesota | 5–10–4 | 14
row 12 : November 29 | Oakland | 3–5 | Pittsburgh | 6–10–4 | 16
row 13 : November 30 | Pittsburgh | 3–3 | Philadelphia | 6–10–5 | 17 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What record has pittsburgh as the visitor, and November 23 as the date?

Answer: 5–10–3
[Table] header: Date | Visitor | Score | Home | Record | Points row 1 : November 1 | Minnesota | 3–6 | Pittsburgh | 2–4–3 | 7
row 2 : November 2 | Pittsburgh | 3–4 | Detroit | 2–5–3 | 7
row 3 : November 5 | Detroit | 4–2 | Pittsburgh | 2–6–3 | 7
row 4 : November 8 | Chicago | 4–1 | Pittsburgh | 2–7–3 | 7
row 5 : November 12 | Pittsburgh | 3–0 | Toronto | 3–7–3 | 9
row 6 : November 13 | Pittsburgh | 0–4 | St. Louis | 3–8–3 | 9
row 7 : November 15 | Los Angeles | 1–3 | Pittsburgh | 4–8–3 | 11
row 8 : November 19 | St. Louis | 4–0 | Pittsburgh | 4–9–3 | 11
row 9 : November 22 | Philadelphia | 3–5 | Pittsburgh | 5–9–3 | 13
row 10 : November 23 | Pittsburgh | 2–3 | Chicago | 5–10–3 | 13
row 11 : November 26 | Pittsburgh | 4–4 | Minnesota | 5–10–4 | 14
row 12 : November 29 | Oakland | 3–5 | Pittsburgh | 6–10–4 | 16
row 13 : November 30 | Pittsburgh | 3–3 | Philadelphia | 6–10–5 | 17 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What record has points less than 16, and detroit as the home?

Answer: 2–5–3
[Table] header: Date | Visitor | Score | Home | Record | Points row 1 : November 1 | Minnesota | 3–6 | Pittsburgh | 2–4–3 | 7
row 2 : November 2 | Pittsburgh | 3–4 | Detroit | 2–5–3 | 7
row 3 : November 5 | Detroit | 4–2 | Pittsburgh | 2–6–3 | 7
row 4 : November 8 | Chicago | 4–1 | Pittsburgh | 2–7–3 | 7
row 5 : November 12 | Pittsburgh | 3–0 | Toronto | 3–7–3 | 9
row 6 : November 13 | Pittsburgh | 0–4 | St. Louis | 3–8–3 | 9
row 7 : November 15 | Los Angeles | 1–3 | Pittsburgh | 4–8–3 | 11
row 8 : November 19 | St. Louis | 4–0 | Pittsburgh | 4–9–3 | 11
row 9 : November 22 | Philadelphia | 3–5 | Pittsburgh | 5–9–3 | 13
row 10 : November 23 | Pittsburgh | 2–3 | Chicago | 5–10–3 | 13
row 11 : November 26 | Pittsburgh | 4–4 | Minnesota | 5–10–4 | 14
row 12 : November 29 | Oakland | 3–5 | Pittsburgh | 6–10–4 | 16
row 13 : November 30 | Pittsburgh | 3–3 | Philadelphia | 6–10–5 | 17 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: How many points have pittsburgh as the visitor, and philadelphia as the home?

Answer: 1.0
[Table] header: Date | Visitor | Score | Home | Record | Points row 1 : November 1 | Minnesota | 3–6 | Pittsburgh | 2–4–3 | 7
row 2 : November 2 | Pittsburgh | 3–4 | Detroit | 2–5–3 | 7
row 3 : November 5 | Detroit | 4–2 | Pittsburgh | 2–6–3 | 7
row 4 : November 8 | Chicago | 4–1 | Pittsburgh | 2–7–3 | 7
row 5 : November 12 | Pittsburgh | 3–0 | Toronto | 3–7–3 | 9
row 6 : November 13 | Pittsburgh | 0–4 | St. Louis | 3–8–3 | 9
row 7 : November 15 | Los Angeles | 1–3 | Pittsburgh | 4–8–3 | 11
row 8 : November 19 | St. Louis | 4–0 | Pittsburgh | 4–9–3 | 11
row 9 : November 22 | Philadelphia | 3–5 | Pittsburgh | 5–9–3 | 13
row 10 : November 23 | Pittsburgh | 2–3 | Chicago | 5–10–3 | 13
row 11 : November 26 | Pittsburgh | 4–4 | Minnesota | 5–10–4 | 14
row 12 : November 29 | Oakland | 3–5 | Pittsburgh | 6–10–4 | 16
row 13 : November 30 | Pittsburgh | 3–3 | Philadelphia | 6–10–5 | 17 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What points have pittsburgh as the home, and November 29 as the date?

Answer: 16.0
[Table] header: Week | Date | Opponent | Result | Attendance row 1 : 1 | September 11, 1966 | Cleveland Browns | L 38-14 | 48,643
row 2 : 2 | September 18, 1966 | at St. Louis Cardinals | L 23-7 | 40,198
row 3 : 3 | September 25, 1966 | at Pittsburgh Steelers | W 33-27 | 37,505
row 4 : 4 | October 2, 1966 | Pittsburgh Steelers | W 24-10 | 47,360
row 5 : 5 | October 9, 1966 | Atlanta Falcons | W 33-20 | 50,116
row 6 : 6 | October 16, 1966 | at New York Giants | L 13-10 | 62,865
row 7 : 7 | October 23, 1966 | St. Louis Cardinals | W 26-20 | 50,154
row 8 : 8 | October 30, 1966 | at Philadelphia Eagles | W 27-13 | 60,658
row 9 : 9 | November 6, 1966 | at Baltimore Colts | L 37-10 | 60,238
row 10 : 10 | November 13, 1966 | Dallas Cowboys | L 31-30 | 50,927
row 11 : 11 | November 20, 1966 | at Cleveland Browns | L 14-3 | 78,466
row 12 : 12 | November 27, 1966 | New York Giants | W 72-41 | 50,439
row 13 : 13 | Bye | Bye | Bye | Bye
row 14 : 14 | December 11, 1966 | at Dallas Cowboys | W 34-31 | 64,198
row 15 : 15 | December 18, 1966 | Philadelphia Eagles | L 37-28 | 50,405 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What was the attendance at the game on December 11, 1966?

Answer: 64198.0
[Table] header: Week | Date | Opponent | Result | Attendance row 1 : 1 | September 11, 1966 | Cleveland Browns | L 38-14 | 48,643
row 2 : 2 | September 18, 1966 | at St. Louis Cardinals | L 23-7 | 40,198
row 3 : 3 | September 25, 1966 | at Pittsburgh Steelers | W 33-27 | 37,505
row 4 : 4 | October 2, 1966 | Pittsburgh Steelers | W 24-10 | 47,360
row 5 : 5 | October 9, 1966 | Atlanta Falcons | W 33-20 | 50,116
row 6 : 6 | October 16, 1966 | at New York Giants | L 13-10 | 62,865
row 7 : 7 | October 23, 1966 | St. Louis Cardinals | W 26-20 | 50,154
row 8 : 8 | October 30, 1966 | at Philadelphia Eagles | W 27-13 | 60,658
row 9 : 9 | November 6, 1966 | at Baltimore Colts | L 37-10 | 60,238
row 10 : 10 | November 13, 1966 | Dallas Cowboys | L 31-30 | 50,927
row 11 : 11 | November 20, 1966 | at Cleveland Browns | L 14-3 | 78,466
row 12 : 12 | November 27, 1966 | New York Giants | W 72-41 | 50,439
row 13 : 13 | Bye | Bye | Bye | Bye
row 14 : 14 | December 11, 1966 | at Dallas Cowboys | W 34-31 | 64,198
row 15 : 15 | December 18, 1966 | Philadelphia Eagles | L 37-28 | 50,405 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What was the latest week with a result of l 14-3?

Answer: 11.0
[Table] header: Week | Date | Opponent | Result | Attendance row 1 : 1 | September 11, 1966 | Cleveland Browns | L 38-14 | 48,643
row 2 : 2 | September 18, 1966 | at St. Louis Cardinals | L 23-7 | 40,198
row 3 : 3 | September 25, 1966 | at Pittsburgh Steelers | W 33-27 | 37,505
row 4 : 4 | October 2, 1966 | Pittsburgh Steelers | W 24-10 | 47,360
row 5 : 5 | October 9, 1966 | Atlanta Falcons | W 33-20 | 50,116
row 6 : 6 | October 16, 1966 | at New York Giants | L 13-10 | 62,865
row 7 : 7 | October 23, 1966 | St. Louis Cardinals | W 26-20 | 50,154
row 8 : 8 | October 30, 1966 | at Philadelphia Eagles | W 27-13 | 60,658
row 9 : 9 | November 6, 1966 | at Baltimore Colts | L 37-10 | 60,238
row 10 : 10 | November 13, 1966 | Dallas Cowboys | L 31-30 | 50,927
row 11 : 11 | November 20, 1966 | at Cleveland Browns | L 14-3 | 78,466
row 12 : 12 | November 27, 1966 | New York Giants | W 72-41 | 50,439
row 13 : 13 | Bye | Bye | Bye | Bye
row 14 : 14 | December 11, 1966 | at Dallas Cowboys | W 34-31 | 64,198
row 15 : 15 | December 18, 1966 | Philadelphia Eagles | L 37-28 | 50,405 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What was the total number of weeks with a date of bye?

Answer: 1.0
[Table] header: Week | Date | Opponent | Result | Attendance row 1 : 1 | September 11, 1966 | Cleveland Browns | L 38-14 | 48,643
row 2 : 2 | September 18, 1966 | at St. Louis Cardinals | L 23-7 | 40,198
row 3 : 3 | September 25, 1966 | at Pittsburgh Steelers | W 33-27 | 37,505
row 4 : 4 | October 2, 1966 | Pittsburgh Steelers | W 24-10 | 47,360
row 5 : 5 | October 9, 1966 | Atlanta Falcons | W 33-20 | 50,116
row 6 : 6 | October 16, 1966 | at New York Giants | L 13-10 | 62,865
row 7 : 7 | October 23, 1966 | St. Louis Cardinals | W 26-20 | 50,154
row 8 : 8 | October 30, 1966 | at Philadelphia Eagles | W 27-13 | 60,658
row 9 : 9 | November 6, 1966 | at Baltimore Colts | L 37-10 | 60,238
row 10 : 10 | November 13, 1966 | Dallas Cowboys | L 31-30 | 50,927
row 11 : 11 | November 20, 1966 | at Cleveland Browns | L 14-3 | 78,466
row 12 : 12 | November 27, 1966 | New York Giants | W 72-41 | 50,439
row 13 : 13 | Bye | Bye | Bye | Bye
row 14 : 14 | December 11, 1966 | at Dallas Cowboys | W 34-31 | 64,198
row 15 : 15 | December 18, 1966 | Philadelphia Eagles | L 37-28 | 50,405 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: Who was the opponent at the game with a result of W 26-20?

Answer: St. Louis Cardinals
[Table] header: Week | Date | Opponent | Result | Attendance row 1 : 1 | September 11, 1966 | Cleveland Browns | L 38-14 | 48,643
row 2 : 2 | September 18, 1966 | at St. Louis Cardinals | L 23-7 | 40,198
row 3 : 3 | September 25, 1966 | at Pittsburgh Steelers | W 33-27 | 37,505
row 4 : 4 | October 2, 1966 | Pittsburgh Steelers | W 24-10 | 47,360
row 5 : 5 | October 9, 1966 | Atlanta Falcons | W 33-20 | 50,116
row 6 : 6 | October 16, 1966 | at New York Giants | L 13-10 | 62,865
row 7 : 7 | October 23, 1966 | St. Louis Cardinals | W 26-20 | 50,154
row 8 : 8 | October 30, 1966 | at Philadelphia Eagles | W 27-13 | 60,658
row 9 : 9 | November 6, 1966 | at Baltimore Colts | L 37-10 | 60,238
row 10 : 10 | November 13, 1966 | Dallas Cowboys | L 31-30 | 50,927
row 11 : 11 | November 20, 1966 | at Cleveland Browns | L 14-3 | 78,466
row 12 : 12 | November 27, 1966 | New York Giants | W 72-41 | 50,439
row 13 : 13 | Bye | Bye | Bye | Bye
row 14 : 14 | December 11, 1966 | at Dallas Cowboys | W 34-31 | 64,198
row 15 : 15 | December 18, 1966 | Philadelphia Eagles | L 37-28 | 50,405 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What was the attendance at the week 2 game?

Answer: 40198.0