sail/symbolic-instruction-tuning huggingface dataset:
[Table] header: Triples | Player | Team | Year | Years Record Stood row 1 : 14 | Ross Barnes | Chicago White Stockings | 1876 | 6
row 2 : 14 | Buttercup Dickerson | Cincinnati Reds | 1879 | 3
row 3 : 14 | Harry Stovey | Worcester Ruby Legs | 1880 | 2
row 4 : 18 | Roger Connor | Troy Trojans | 1882 | 2
row 5 : 20 | Buck Ewing | New York Giants | 1884 | 3
row 6 : 20 | Roger Connor | New York Giants | 1886 | 1
row 7 : 23 | Sam Thompson | Detroit Wolverines | 1887 | 3
row 8 : 26 | John Reilly | Cincinnati Reds | 1890 | 3
row 9 : 29 | Perry Werden | St. Louis Browns (NL) | 1893 | 1
row 10 : 31 | Heinie Reitz | Baltimore Orioles (NL) | 1894 | 18
row 11 : 21 | Bill Keister | Baltimore Orioles | 1901 | (1) 7
row 12 : 21 | Jimmy Williams | Baltimore Orioles | 1901 | (1)
row 13 : 22 | Sam Crawford | Cincinnati Reds | 1902 | (1)
row 14 : 22 | Tommy Leach | Pittsburgh Pirates | 1902 | (1)
row 15 : 25 | Sam Crawford | Detroit Tigers | 1903 | (9)
row 16 : 36 | Chief Wilson | Pittsburgh Pirates | 1912 | current [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What is the years record stood from the Pittsburgh Pirates in 1902?

Answer: (1)
[Table] header: Main contestant | Co-contestant (Yaar vs. Pyaar) | Date performed | Scores by each individual judge | Total score/week | Position | Status row 1 : Kashmira Shah | Mukul Dev | August 13 | 6 + 5 + 7 = 18 | 48/60 | Bottom 2 | Current
row 2 : Kashmira Shah | Krushna Abhishek | August 14 | 10 + 10 + 10 = 30 | 48/60 | Bottom 2 | Current
row 3 : Karanvir Bohra | Tina Parekh | August 13 | 7 + 9 + 8 = 24 | 54/60 | Safe | Current
row 4 : Karanvir Bohra | Teejay Sidhu | August 14 | 10 + 10 + 10 = 30 | 54/60 | Safe | Current
row 5 : Mridul Singhvi | Wasna Ahmed | August 13 | 6 + 7 + 8 = 21 | 51/60 | Bottom 2 | Eliminated
row 6 : Mridul Singhvi | Tina Sachdev | August 14 | 10 + 10 + 10 = 30 | 51/60 | Bottom 2 | Eliminated [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What Scores by each individual judge has a Status of eliminated, and a Date performed of august 13?

Answer: 6 + 7 + 8 = 21
[Table] header: Main contestant | Co-contestant (Yaar vs. Pyaar) | Date performed | Scores by each individual judge | Total score/week | Position | Status row 1 : Kashmira Shah | Mukul Dev | August 13 | 6 + 5 + 7 = 18 | 48/60 | Bottom 2 | Current
row 2 : Kashmira Shah | Krushna Abhishek | August 14 | 10 + 10 + 10 = 30 | 48/60 | Bottom 2 | Current
row 3 : Karanvir Bohra | Tina Parekh | August 13 | 7 + 9 + 8 = 24 | 54/60 | Safe | Current
row 4 : Karanvir Bohra | Teejay Sidhu | August 14 | 10 + 10 + 10 = 30 | 54/60 | Safe | Current
row 5 : Mridul Singhvi | Wasna Ahmed | August 13 | 6 + 7 + 8 = 21 | 51/60 | Bottom 2 | Eliminated
row 6 : Mridul Singhvi | Tina Sachdev | August 14 | 10 + 10 + 10 = 30 | 51/60 | Bottom 2 | Eliminated [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What Scores by each individual judge has a Total score/week of 51/60, and a Co-contestant (Yaar vs. Pyaar) of tina sachdev?

Answer: 10 + 10 + 10 = 30
[Table] header: Main contestant | Co-contestant (Yaar vs. Pyaar) | Date performed | Scores by each individual judge | Total score/week | Position | Status row 1 : Kashmira Shah | Mukul Dev | August 13 | 6 + 5 + 7 = 18 | 48/60 | Bottom 2 | Current
row 2 : Kashmira Shah | Krushna Abhishek | August 14 | 10 + 10 + 10 = 30 | 48/60 | Bottom 2 | Current
row 3 : Karanvir Bohra | Tina Parekh | August 13 | 7 + 9 + 8 = 24 | 54/60 | Safe | Current
row 4 : Karanvir Bohra | Teejay Sidhu | August 14 | 10 + 10 + 10 = 30 | 54/60 | Safe | Current
row 5 : Mridul Singhvi | Wasna Ahmed | August 13 | 6 + 7 + 8 = 21 | 51/60 | Bottom 2 | Eliminated
row 6 : Mridul Singhvi | Tina Sachdev | August 14 | 10 + 10 + 10 = 30 | 51/60 | Bottom 2 | Eliminated [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What Co-contestant (Yaar vs. Pyaar) has a Total score/week of 48/60, and a Date performed of august 14?

Answer: Krushna Abhishek
[Table] header: Main contestant | Co-contestant (Yaar vs. Pyaar) | Date performed | Scores by each individual judge | Total score/week | Position | Status row 1 : Kashmira Shah | Mukul Dev | August 13 | 6 + 5 + 7 = 18 | 48/60 | Bottom 2 | Current
row 2 : Kashmira Shah | Krushna Abhishek | August 14 | 10 + 10 + 10 = 30 | 48/60 | Bottom 2 | Current
row 3 : Karanvir Bohra | Tina Parekh | August 13 | 7 + 9 + 8 = 24 | 54/60 | Safe | Current
row 4 : Karanvir Bohra | Teejay Sidhu | August 14 | 10 + 10 + 10 = 30 | 54/60 | Safe | Current
row 5 : Mridul Singhvi | Wasna Ahmed | August 13 | 6 + 7 + 8 = 21 | 51/60 | Bottom 2 | Eliminated
row 6 : Mridul Singhvi | Tina Sachdev | August 14 | 10 + 10 + 10 = 30 | 51/60 | Bottom 2 | Eliminated [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What Date performed has a Scores by each individual judge of 10 + 10 + 10 = 30, and a Main contestant of karanvir bohra?

Answer: August 14
[Table] header: Main contestant | Co-contestant (Yaar vs. Pyaar) | Date performed | Scores by each individual judge | Total score/week | Position | Status row 1 : Kashmira Shah | Mukul Dev | August 13 | 6 + 5 + 7 = 18 | 48/60 | Bottom 2 | Current
row 2 : Kashmira Shah | Krushna Abhishek | August 14 | 10 + 10 + 10 = 30 | 48/60 | Bottom 2 | Current
row 3 : Karanvir Bohra | Tina Parekh | August 13 | 7 + 9 + 8 = 24 | 54/60 | Safe | Current
row 4 : Karanvir Bohra | Teejay Sidhu | August 14 | 10 + 10 + 10 = 30 | 54/60 | Safe | Current
row 5 : Mridul Singhvi | Wasna Ahmed | August 13 | 6 + 7 + 8 = 21 | 51/60 | Bottom 2 | Eliminated
row 6 : Mridul Singhvi | Tina Sachdev | August 14 | 10 + 10 + 10 = 30 | 51/60 | Bottom 2 | Eliminated [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What Status has a Date performed of august 13, and a Position of safe?

Answer: Current
[Table] header: Main contestant | Co-contestant (Yaar vs. Pyaar) | Date performed | Scores by each individual judge | Total score/week | Position | Status row 1 : Kashmira Shah | Mukul Dev | August 13 | 6 + 5 + 7 = 18 | 48/60 | Bottom 2 | Current
row 2 : Kashmira Shah | Krushna Abhishek | August 14 | 10 + 10 + 10 = 30 | 48/60 | Bottom 2 | Current
row 3 : Karanvir Bohra | Tina Parekh | August 13 | 7 + 9 + 8 = 24 | 54/60 | Safe | Current
row 4 : Karanvir Bohra | Teejay Sidhu | August 14 | 10 + 10 + 10 = 30 | 54/60 | Safe | Current
row 5 : Mridul Singhvi | Wasna Ahmed | August 13 | 6 + 7 + 8 = 21 | 51/60 | Bottom 2 | Eliminated
row 6 : Mridul Singhvi | Tina Sachdev | August 14 | 10 + 10 + 10 = 30 | 51/60 | Bottom 2 | Eliminated [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What Scores by each individual judge has a Status of current, and a Co-contestant (Yaar vs. Pyaar) of krushna abhishek?

Answer: 10 + 10 + 10 = 30
[Table] header: Constituency number | Name | Reserved for ( SC / ST /None) | District | Number of electorates (2009) row 1 : 60 | Meham | None | Rohtak | 144,421
row 2 : 61 | Garhi Sampla-Kiloi | None | Rohtak | 158,816
row 3 : 62 | Rohtak | None | Rohtak | 126,569
row 4 : 63 | Kalanaur | SC | Rohtak | 141,504
row 5 : 64 | Bahadurgarh | None | Jhajjar | 128,968
row 6 : 65 | Badli | None | Jhajjar | 132,536
row 7 : 66 | Jhajjar | SC | Jhajjar | 130,751
row 8 : 67 | Beri | None | Jhajjar | 132,147
row 9 : 73 | Kosli | None | Rewari | 177,406 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: Which Number of electorates (2009) has a District of jhajjar, and a Reserved for (SC/ST/None) of sc, and a Constituency number smaller than 66?

Answer: 0.0
[Table] header: Rank | Athlete | Taijiquan | Taijijian | Total row 1 : 1 | Cui Wenjuan ( CHN  | 9.85 | 9.84 | 19.69
row 2 : 2 | Chai Fong Ying ( MAS | 9.64 | 9.70 | 19.34
row 3 : 3 | Ai Miyaoka ( JPN | 9.66 | 9.64 | 19.30
row 4 : 4 | Fan Man-Yun ( TPE ) | 9.62 | 9.61 | 19.23
row 5 : 5 | Peggie Ho Pak Kei ( H | 9.58 | 9.56 | 19.14
row 6 : 6 | Lindswell ( INA ) | 9.44 | 9.51 | 18.95
row 7 : 7 | Ho Si Hang ( MAC ) | 9.41 | 9.53 | 18.94
row 8 : 8 | Susie Parnham ( AUS ) | 8.96 | 8.94 | 17.90 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What is the highest rank of the athlete with a Taijiquan higher than 9.64 and a total more than 19.69?

Answer: none
[Table] header: Rank | Athlete | Taijiquan | Taijijian | Total row 1 : 1 | Cui Wenjuan ( CHN  | 9.85 | 9.84 | 19.69
row 2 : 2 | Chai Fong Ying ( MAS | 9.64 | 9.70 | 19.34
row 3 : 3 | Ai Miyaoka ( JPN | 9.66 | 9.64 | 19.30
row 4 : 4 | Fan Man-Yun ( TPE ) | 9.62 | 9.61 | 19.23
row 5 : 5 | Peggie Ho Pak Kei ( H | 9.58 | 9.56 | 19.14
row 6 : 6 | Lindswell ( INA ) | 9.44 | 9.51 | 18.95
row 7 : 7 | Ho Si Hang ( MAC ) | 9.41 | 9.53 | 18.94
row 8 : 8 | Susie Parnham ( AUS ) | 8.96 | 8.94 | 17.90 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What is the lowest Taijiquan of the athlete who has a Taijijian of 9.7 and a total more than 19.34?

Answer: none
[Table] header: Year | Award Ceremony | Category | Nominee | Result row 1 : 2003 | AIMS Award | Best Overall Show | Best Overall Show | Won
row 2 : 2003 | AIMS Award | Best Actor | Todd Brothers | Won
row 3 : 2003 | AIMS Award | Best Actress | Marie Kelly | Won
row 4 : 2003 | AIMS Award | Best Supporting Actor | Chris Ramsey | Won
row 5 : 2003 | AIMS Award | Best Supporting Actress | Yvonne Ramsey | Nominated
row 6 : 2003 | AIMS Award | Best Director | Pat Dwyer | Won
row 7 : 2003 | AIMS Award | Best Music Director | Graham Walsh | Nominated
row 8 : 2003 | AIMS Award | Best Chorus | Best Chorus | Won [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What are the years that had someone nominated for best supporting actress?

Answer: 1.0
[Table] header: Year | Award Ceremony | Category | Nominee | Result row 1 : 2003 | AIMS Award | Best Overall Show | Best Overall Show | Won
row 2 : 2003 | AIMS Award | Best Actor | Todd Brothers | Won
row 3 : 2003 | AIMS Award | Best Actress | Marie Kelly | Won
row 4 : 2003 | AIMS Award | Best Supporting Actor | Chris Ramsey | Won
row 5 : 2003 | AIMS Award | Best Supporting Actress | Yvonne Ramsey | Nominated
row 6 : 2003 | AIMS Award | Best Director | Pat Dwyer | Won
row 7 : 2003 | AIMS Award | Best Music Director | Graham Walsh | Nominated
row 8 : 2003 | AIMS Award | Best Chorus | Best Chorus | Won [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What's the nominee for best supporting actress?

Answer: Yvonne Ramsey
[Table] header: Tie no | Home team | Score | Away team | Date row 1 : 1 | Burnley | 1–1 | Sheffield Wednesday | 12 March 1983
row 2 : Replay | Sheffield Wednesday | 5–0 | Burnley | 16 March 1983
row 3 : 2 | Brighton & Hove Albion | 1–0 | Norwich City | 12 March 1983
row 4 : 3 | Manchester United | 1–0 | Everton | 12 March 1983
row 5 : 4 | Arsenal | 2–0 | Aston Villa | 12 March 1983 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What is the Tie no of the game with a Score of 1–1?

Answer: 1.0
[Table] header: Tie no | Home team | Score | Away team | Date row 1 : 1 | Burnley | 1–1 | Sheffield Wednesday | 12 March 1983
row 2 : Replay | Sheffield Wednesday | 5–0 | Burnley | 16 March 1983
row 3 : 2 | Brighton & Hove Albion | 1–0 | Norwich City | 12 March 1983
row 4 : 3 | Manchester United | 1–0 | Everton | 12 March 1983
row 5 : 4 | Arsenal | 2–0 | Aston Villa | 12 March 1983 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What is the Score of the Burnley Home game?

Answer: 1–1
[Table] header: Tie no | Home team | Score | Away team | Date row 1 : 1 | Burnley | 1–1 | Sheffield Wednesday | 12 March 1983
row 2 : Replay | Sheffield Wednesday | 5–0 | Burnley | 16 March 1983
row 3 : 2 | Brighton & Hove Albion | 1–0 | Norwich City | 12 March 1983
row 4 : 3 | Manchester United | 1–0 | Everton | 12 March 1983
row 5 : 4 | Arsenal | 2–0 | Aston Villa | 12 March 1983 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What is the Away team when Arsenal is the Home team?

Answer: Aston Villa
[Table] header: Tie no | Home team | Score | Away team | Date row 1 : 1 | Burnley | 1–1 | Sheffield Wednesday | 12 March 1983
row 2 : Replay | Sheffield Wednesday | 5–0 | Burnley | 16 March 1983
row 3 : 2 | Brighton & Hove Albion | 1–0 | Norwich City | 12 March 1983
row 4 : 3 | Manchester United | 1–0 | Everton | 12 March 1983
row 5 : 4 | Arsenal | 2–0 | Aston Villa | 12 March 1983 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What is the Date of Tie no 3?

Answer: 12 March 1983
[Table] header: Res. | Record | Opponent | Method | Event | Round | Time | Location row 1 : Loss | 4–2 | Matt Mitrione | TKO (punches) | UFC 113 | 2 | 4:24 | Montreal, Quebec , Canada
row 2 : Win | 4–1 | Houston Alexander | Decision (unanimous) | TUF 10 Finale | 3 | 5:00 | Las Vegas, Nevada , United States
row 3 : Loss | 3–1 | Seth Petruzelli | KO (punches) | EliteXC: Heat | 1 | 0:14 | Sunrise, Florida , United States
row 4 : Win | 3–0 | James Thompson | TKO (punches) | EliteXC: Primetime | 3 | 0:38 | Newark, New Jersey , United States
row 5 : Win | 2–0 | Tank Abbott | KO (punches) | EliteXC: Street Certified | 1 | 0:43 | Miami, Florida , United States
row 6 : Win | 1–0 | Bo Cantrell | Submission (punches) | EliteXC: Renegade | 1 | 0:19 | Corpus Christi, Texas , United States [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: Which opponent has a record of 3–1?

Answer: Seth Petruzelli
[Table] header: Res. | Record | Opponent | Method | Event | Round | Time | Location row 1 : Loss | 4–2 | Matt Mitrione | TKO (punches) | UFC 113 | 2 | 4:24 | Montreal, Quebec , Canada
row 2 : Win | 4–1 | Houston Alexander | Decision (unanimous) | TUF 10 Finale | 3 | 5:00 | Las Vegas, Nevada , United States
row 3 : Loss | 3–1 | Seth Petruzelli | KO (punches) | EliteXC: Heat | 1 | 0:14 | Sunrise, Florida , United States
row 4 : Win | 3–0 | James Thompson | TKO (punches) | EliteXC: Primetime | 3 | 0:38 | Newark, New Jersey , United States
row 5 : Win | 2–0 | Tank Abbott | KO (punches) | EliteXC: Street Certified | 1 | 0:43 | Miami, Florida , United States
row 6 : Win | 1–0 | Bo Cantrell | Submission (punches) | EliteXC: Renegade | 1 | 0:19 | Corpus Christi, Texas , United States [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What event has a Record of 4–2?

Answer: UFC 113
[Table] header: Res. | Record | Opponent | Method | Event | Round | Time | Location row 1 : Loss | 4–2 | Matt Mitrione | TKO (punches) | UFC 113 | 2 | 4:24 | Montreal, Quebec , Canada
row 2 : Win | 4–1 | Houston Alexander | Decision (unanimous) | TUF 10 Finale | 3 | 5:00 | Las Vegas, Nevada , United States
row 3 : Loss | 3–1 | Seth Petruzelli | KO (punches) | EliteXC: Heat | 1 | 0:14 | Sunrise, Florida , United States
row 4 : Win | 3–0 | James Thompson | TKO (punches) | EliteXC: Primetime | 3 | 0:38 | Newark, New Jersey , United States
row 5 : Win | 2–0 | Tank Abbott | KO (punches) | EliteXC: Street Certified | 1 | 0:43 | Miami, Florida , United States
row 6 : Win | 1–0 | Bo Cantrell | Submission (punches) | EliteXC: Renegade | 1 | 0:19 | Corpus Christi, Texas , United States [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: Which Opponent has a Time of 0:38?

Answer: James Thompson
[Table] header: Date | Location | Score | Result | Competition row 1 : 26 October 1994 | Tallinna | 7–0 | Win | Friendly
row 2 : 16 February 1995 | Trinidad | 2–2 | Draw | Friendly
row 3 : 6 October 1996 | Helsinki | 2–3 | Lose | 1998 FIFA World Cup qualification
row 4 : 5 September 1998 | Helsinki | 3–2 | Win | UEFA Euro 2000 qualifying
row 5 : 9 October 1999 | Helsinki | 4–1 | Win | UEFA Euro 2000 qualifying
row 6 : 15 August 2001 | Helsinki | 4–1 | Win | Friendly
row 7 : 5 September 2001 | Helsinki | 5–1 | Win | 2002 FIFA World Cup qualification
row 8 : 27 March 2002 | Porto | 4–1 | Win | Friendly
row 9 : 7 June 2003 | Helsinki | 3–0 | Win | UEFA Euro 2004 qualifying
row 10 : 11 October 2003 | Tampere | 3–2 | Win | Friendly [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What was the score when the result was win, in Helsinki, competition was friendly?

Answer: 4–1
[Table] header: Date | Location | Score | Result | Competition row 1 : 26 October 1994 | Tallinna | 7–0 | Win | Friendly
row 2 : 16 February 1995 | Trinidad | 2–2 | Draw | Friendly
row 3 : 6 October 1996 | Helsinki | 2–3 | Lose | 1998 FIFA World Cup qualification
row 4 : 5 September 1998 | Helsinki | 3–2 | Win | UEFA Euro 2000 qualifying
row 5 : 9 October 1999 | Helsinki | 4–1 | Win | UEFA Euro 2000 qualifying
row 6 : 15 August 2001 | Helsinki | 4–1 | Win | Friendly
row 7 : 5 September 2001 | Helsinki | 5–1 | Win | 2002 FIFA World Cup qualification
row 8 : 27 March 2002 | Porto | 4–1 | Win | Friendly
row 9 : 7 June 2003 | Helsinki | 3–0 | Win | UEFA Euro 2004 qualifying
row 10 : 11 October 2003 | Tampere | 3–2 | Win | Friendly [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What competition has a Score of 7–0?

Answer: Friendly
[Table] header: Date | Location | Score | Result | Competition row 1 : 26 October 1994 | Tallinna | 7–0 | Win | Friendly
row 2 : 16 February 1995 | Trinidad | 2–2 | Draw | Friendly
row 3 : 6 October 1996 | Helsinki | 2–3 | Lose | 1998 FIFA World Cup qualification
row 4 : 5 September 1998 | Helsinki | 3–2 | Win | UEFA Euro 2000 qualifying
row 5 : 9 October 1999 | Helsinki | 4–1 | Win | UEFA Euro 2000 qualifying
row 6 : 15 August 2001 | Helsinki | 4–1 | Win | Friendly
row 7 : 5 September 2001 | Helsinki | 5–1 | Win | 2002 FIFA World Cup qualification
row 8 : 27 March 2002 | Porto | 4–1 | Win | Friendly
row 9 : 7 June 2003 | Helsinki | 3–0 | Win | UEFA Euro 2004 qualifying
row 10 : 11 October 2003 | Tampere | 3–2 | Win | Friendly [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What date has a result of win, in a friendly competition in Porto?

Answer: 27 March 2002
[Table] header: Name | Country | City | Mission's Country | Start Date row 1 : John William, Baron Ripperda | Spain | Madrid | Kingdom of Great Britain | April13,1726
row 2 : José Manuel Balmaceda | Chile | Santiago | Argentina | August 29, 1891
row 3 : Leonardo Argüello Barreto | Nicaragua | Managua | Mexico | May26,1947
row 4 : Víctor Raúl Haya de la | Peru | Lima | Colombia | January3,1949
row 5 : Jacobo Arbenz Guzmán | Guatemala | Guatemala City | Mexico | June27,1954
row 6 : Imre Nagy | Hungary | Budapest | Yugoslavia | November4,1956
row 7 : József Mindszent | Hungary | Budapest | United States | November4,1956
row 8 : Reino Häyhänen | France | Paris | United States | November4,1956
row 9 : Sharif Ali bin al-Hussein | Iraq | Baghdad | Saudi Arabia | July15,1958
row 10 : Humberto Delgado | Portugal | Lisbon | Brazil | January12,1959
row 11 : The Siberian Seven | Soviet Union | Moscow | United States | June27,1978
row 12 : Ange Patasse | Central African Republic | Bangui | France | February27,1982
row 13 : Francisco René Bobadilla Palo | Guatemala | Guatemala City | Brazil | 1982
row 14 : Fang Lizhi and his wife | China PRC | Beijing | United States | June5,1989
row 15 : Hou Dejian | China PRC | Beijing | Australia | June1989
row 16 : Manuel Noriega | Panama | Ciudad de Panama | Holy See | December24,1989
row 17 : Michel Aoun | Lebanon | Beirut | France | October1990
row 18 : Erich Honecker | Russia | Moscow | Chile | December24,1991
row 19 : Mohammad Najibullah | Afghanistan | Kabul | United Nations | April 16, 1992
row 20 : Sylvestre Ntibantunganya | Burundi | Bujumbura | United States | July23,1996
row 21 : Abdullah Öcalan | Kenya | Nairobi | Greece | January1999
row 22 : João Bernardo Vieira | Guinea-Bissau | Bissau | Portugal | May1999
row 23 : Alassane Ouattara | Côte d'Ivoire | Abidjan | France | September19,2002
row 24 : Morgan Tsvangirai | Zimbabwe | Harare | The Netherlands | June22,2008
row 25 : Anwar Ibrahim | Malaysia | Kuala Lumpur | Turkey | June29,2008
row 26 : Andry Rajoelina | Madagascar | Antananarivo | France | March 6, 2009
row 27 : Manuel Zelaya | Honduras | Tegucigalpa | Brazil | September21,2009
row 28 : Shahram Amiri | United States | Washington D.C. | Pakistan | July13,2010
row 29 : Wang Lijun | China PRC | Chengdu | United States | February6,2012
row 30 : Amadou Toumani Touré | Mali | Bamako | Senegal | April18,2012
row 31 : Chen Guangcheng | China PRC | Beijing | United States | April26,2012 ?
row 32 : Roger Pinto | Bolivia | La Paz | Brazil | May28,2012
row 33 : Julian Assange | United Kingdom | London | Ecuador | June19,2012
row 34 : Mohamed Nasheed | Republic of Maldives | Malé | India | February13,2013
row 35 : Bosco Ntaganda | Rwanda | Kigali | United States | March18,2013 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: Who has the city Santiago?

Answer: José Manuel Balmaceda
[Table] header: Date | Score | Set 1 | Set 2 | Total row 1 : 3 July | 0–2 | 15:21 | 15:21 | 30:42
row 2 : 3 July | 0–2 | 15:21 | 19:21 | 34:42
row 3 : 3 July | 2–1 | 19:21 | 21:19 | 55:53
row 4 : 3 July | 2–0 | 21:16 | 21:17 | 42:33
row 5 : 3 July | 0–2 | 12:21 | 14:21 | 26:42
row 6 : 3 July | 2–0 | 22:20 | 21:16 | 43:36
row 7 : 3 July | 1–2 | 21:17 | 21:23 | 53:55
row 8 : 3 July | 2–0 | 21:11 | 21:12 | 42:23 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What is the score for Set 2 at 15:21?

Answer: 0–2
[Table] header: Date | Score | Set 1 | Set 2 | Total row 1 : 3 July | 0–2 | 15:21 | 15:21 | 30:42
row 2 : 3 July | 0–2 | 15:21 | 19:21 | 34:42
row 3 : 3 July | 2–1 | 19:21 | 21:19 | 55:53
row 4 : 3 July | 2–0 | 21:16 | 21:17 | 42:33
row 5 : 3 July | 0–2 | 12:21 | 14:21 | 26:42
row 6 : 3 July | 2–0 | 22:20 | 21:16 | 43:36
row 7 : 3 July | 1–2 | 21:17 | 21:23 | 53:55
row 8 : 3 July | 2–0 | 21:11 | 21:12 | 42:23 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What Set 2 has a set one at 19:21?

Answer: 21:19
[Table] header: Date | Score | Set 1 | Set 2 | Total row 1 : 3 July | 0–2 | 15:21 | 15:21 | 30:42
row 2 : 3 July | 0–2 | 15:21 | 19:21 | 34:42
row 3 : 3 July | 2–1 | 19:21 | 21:19 | 55:53
row 4 : 3 July | 2–0 | 21:16 | 21:17 | 42:33
row 5 : 3 July | 0–2 | 12:21 | 14:21 | 26:42
row 6 : 3 July | 2–0 | 22:20 | 21:16 | 43:36
row 7 : 3 July | 1–2 | 21:17 | 21:23 | 53:55
row 8 : 3 July | 2–0 | 21:11 | 21:12 | 42:23 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What is the score for Set 1 at 19:21?

Answer: 2–1
[Table] header: Date | Score | Set 1 | Set 2 | Total row 1 : 3 July | 0–2 | 15:21 | 15:21 | 30:42
row 2 : 3 July | 0–2 | 15:21 | 19:21 | 34:42
row 3 : 3 July | 2–1 | 19:21 | 21:19 | 55:53
row 4 : 3 July | 2–0 | 21:16 | 21:17 | 42:33
row 5 : 3 July | 0–2 | 12:21 | 14:21 | 26:42
row 6 : 3 July | 2–0 | 22:20 | 21:16 | 43:36
row 7 : 3 July | 1–2 | 21:17 | 21:23 | 53:55
row 8 : 3 July | 2–0 | 21:11 | 21:12 | 42:23 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What is the Set 1 with set 2 at 21:17?

Answer: 21:16
[Table] header: Date | Opponents | H / A | Result F – A | Attendance | League position row 1 : 20 August 1994 | Queens Park Rangers | H | 2 – 0 | 43,214 | 3rd
row 2 : 22 August 1994 | Nottingham Forest | A | 1 – 1 | 22,072 | 1st
row 3 : 27 August 1994 | Tottenham Hotspur | A | 1 – 0 | 24,502 | 3rd
row 4 : 31 August 1994 | Wimbledon | H | 3 – 0 | 43,440 | 2nd
row 5 : 11 September 1994 | Leeds United | A | 1 – 2 | 39,396 | 5th
row 6 : 17 September 1994 | Liverpool | H | 2 – 0 | 43,740 | 3rd
row 7 : 24 September 1994 | Ipswich Town | A | 2 – 3 | 22,559 | 4th
row 8 : 1 October 1994 | Everton | H | 2 – 0 | 43,803 | 4th
row 9 : 8 October 1994 | Sheffield Wednesday | A | 0 – 1 | 33,441 | 5th
row 10 : 15 October 1994 | West Ham United | H | 1 – 0 | 43,795 | 4th
row 11 : 24 October 1994 | Blackburn Rovers | A | 4 – 2 | 30,260 | 3rd
row 12 : 29 October 1994 | Newcastle United | H | 2 – 0 | 43,795 | 3rd
row 13 : 6 November 1994 | Aston Villa | A | 2 – 1 | 32,136 | 3rd
row 14 : 10 November 1994 | Manchester City | H | 5 – 0 | 43,738 | 2nd
row 15 : 19 November 1994 | Crystal Palace | H | 3 – 0 | 43,788 | 1st
row 16 : 26 November 1994 | Arsenal | A | 0 – 0 | 38,301 | 2nd
row 17 : 3 December 1994 | Norwich City | H | 1 – 0 | 43,789 | 1st
row 18 : 10 December 1994 | Queens Park Rangers | A | 3 – 2 | 18,948 | 2nd
row 19 : 17 December 1994 | Nottingham Forest | H | 1 – 2 | 43,744 | 2nd
row 20 : 26 December 1994 | Chelsea | A | 3 – 2 | 31,161 | 2nd
row 21 : 28 December 1994 | Leicester City | H | 1 – 1 | 43,789 | 2nd
row 22 : 31 December 1994 | Southampton | A | 2 – 2 | 16,708 | 2nd
row 23 : 3 January 1995 | Coventry City | H | 2 – 0 | 43,130 | 2nd
row 24 : 15 January 1995 | Newcastle United | A | 1 – 1 | 34,471 | 2nd
row 25 : 22 January 1995 | Blackburn Rovers | H | 1 – 0 | 43,742 | 2nd
row 26 : 25 January 1995 | Crystal Palace | A | 1 – 1 | 18,224 | 2nd
row 27 : 4 February 1995 | Aston Villa | H | 1 – 0 | 43,795 | 2nd
row 28 : 11 February 1995 | Manchester City | A | 3 – 0 | 26,368 | 2nd
row 29 : 22 February 1995 | Norwich City | A | 2 – 0 | 21,824 | 1st
row 30 : 25 February 1995 | Everton | A | 0 – 1 | 40,011 | 2nd
row 31 : 4 March 1995 | Ipswich Town | H | 9 – 0 | 43,804 | 2nd
row 32 : 7 March 1995 | Wimbledon | A | 1 – 0 | 18,224 | 1st
row 33 : 15 March 1995 | Tottenham Hotspur | H | 0 – 0 | 43,802 | 2nd
row 34 : 19 March 1995 | Liverpool | A | 0 – 2 | 38,906 | 2nd
row 35 : 22 March 1995 | Arsenal | H | 3 – 0 | 43,623 | 2nd
row 36 : 2 April 1995 | Leeds United | H | 0 – 0 | 43,712 | 2nd
row 37 : 15 April 1995 | Leicester City | A | 4 – 0 | 21,281 | 2nd
row 38 : 17 April 1995 | Chelsea | H | 0 – 0 | 43,728 | 2nd
row 39 : 1 May 1995 | Coventry City | A | 3 – 2 | 21,885 | 2nd
row 40 : 7 May 1995 | Sheffield Wednesday | H | 1 – 0 | 43,868 | 2nd
row 41 : 10 May 1995 | Southampton | H | 2 – 1 | 43,479 | 2nd
row 42 : 14 May 1995 | West Ham United | A | 1 – 1 | 24,783 | 2nd [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What Result F – A has a League position of 2nd, and Opponents of liverpool?

Answer: 0 – 2
[Table] header: Date | Opponents | H / A | Result F – A | Attendance | League position row 1 : 20 August 1994 | Queens Park Rangers | H | 2 – 0 | 43,214 | 3rd
row 2 : 22 August 1994 | Nottingham Forest | A | 1 – 1 | 22,072 | 1st
row 3 : 27 August 1994 | Tottenham Hotspur | A | 1 – 0 | 24,502 | 3rd
row 4 : 31 August 1994 | Wimbledon | H | 3 – 0 | 43,440 | 2nd
row 5 : 11 September 1994 | Leeds United | A | 1 – 2 | 39,396 | 5th
row 6 : 17 September 1994 | Liverpool | H | 2 – 0 | 43,740 | 3rd
row 7 : 24 September 1994 | Ipswich Town | A | 2 – 3 | 22,559 | 4th
row 8 : 1 October 1994 | Everton | H | 2 – 0 | 43,803 | 4th
row 9 : 8 October 1994 | Sheffield Wednesday | A | 0 – 1 | 33,441 | 5th
row 10 : 15 October 1994 | West Ham United | H | 1 – 0 | 43,795 | 4th
row 11 : 24 October 1994 | Blackburn Rovers | A | 4 – 2 | 30,260 | 3rd
row 12 : 29 October 1994 | Newcastle United | H | 2 – 0 | 43,795 | 3rd
row 13 : 6 November 1994 | Aston Villa | A | 2 – 1 | 32,136 | 3rd
row 14 : 10 November 1994 | Manchester City | H | 5 – 0 | 43,738 | 2nd
row 15 : 19 November 1994 | Crystal Palace | H | 3 – 0 | 43,788 | 1st
row 16 : 26 November 1994 | Arsenal | A | 0 – 0 | 38,301 | 2nd
row 17 : 3 December 1994 | Norwich City | H | 1 – 0 | 43,789 | 1st
row 18 : 10 December 1994 | Queens Park Rangers | A | 3 – 2 | 18,948 | 2nd
row 19 : 17 December 1994 | Nottingham Forest | H | 1 – 2 | 43,744 | 2nd
row 20 : 26 December 1994 | Chelsea | A | 3 – 2 | 31,161 | 2nd
row 21 : 28 December 1994 | Leicester City | H | 1 – 1 | 43,789 | 2nd
row 22 : 31 December 1994 | Southampton | A | 2 – 2 | 16,708 | 2nd
row 23 : 3 January 1995 | Coventry City | H | 2 – 0 | 43,130 | 2nd
row 24 : 15 January 1995 | Newcastle United | A | 1 – 1 | 34,471 | 2nd
row 25 : 22 January 1995 | Blackburn Rovers | H | 1 – 0 | 43,742 | 2nd
row 26 : 25 January 1995 | Crystal Palace | A | 1 – 1 | 18,224 | 2nd
row 27 : 4 February 1995 | Aston Villa | H | 1 – 0 | 43,795 | 2nd
row 28 : 11 February 1995 | Manchester City | A | 3 – 0 | 26,368 | 2nd
row 29 : 22 February 1995 | Norwich City | A | 2 – 0 | 21,824 | 1st
row 30 : 25 February 1995 | Everton | A | 0 – 1 | 40,011 | 2nd
row 31 : 4 March 1995 | Ipswich Town | H | 9 – 0 | 43,804 | 2nd
row 32 : 7 March 1995 | Wimbledon | A | 1 – 0 | 18,224 | 1st
row 33 : 15 March 1995 | Tottenham Hotspur | H | 0 – 0 | 43,802 | 2nd
row 34 : 19 March 1995 | Liverpool | A | 0 – 2 | 38,906 | 2nd
row 35 : 22 March 1995 | Arsenal | H | 3 – 0 | 43,623 | 2nd
row 36 : 2 April 1995 | Leeds United | H | 0 – 0 | 43,712 | 2nd
row 37 : 15 April 1995 | Leicester City | A | 4 – 0 | 21,281 | 2nd
row 38 : 17 April 1995 | Chelsea | H | 0 – 0 | 43,728 | 2nd
row 39 : 1 May 1995 | Coventry City | A | 3 – 2 | 21,885 | 2nd
row 40 : 7 May 1995 | Sheffield Wednesday | H | 1 – 0 | 43,868 | 2nd
row 41 : 10 May 1995 | Southampton | H | 2 – 1 | 43,479 | 2nd
row 42 : 14 May 1995 | West Ham United | A | 1 – 1 | 24,783 | 2nd [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What League position has a Result F – A of 2 – 0, and Opponents of queens park rangers?

Answer: 3rd
[Table] header: Date | Opponents | H / A | Result F – A | Attendance | League position row 1 : 20 August 1994 | Queens Park Rangers | H | 2 – 0 | 43,214 | 3rd
row 2 : 22 August 1994 | Nottingham Forest | A | 1 – 1 | 22,072 | 1st
row 3 : 27 August 1994 | Tottenham Hotspur | A | 1 – 0 | 24,502 | 3rd
row 4 : 31 August 1994 | Wimbledon | H | 3 – 0 | 43,440 | 2nd
row 5 : 11 September 1994 | Leeds United | A | 1 – 2 | 39,396 | 5th
row 6 : 17 September 1994 | Liverpool | H | 2 – 0 | 43,740 | 3rd
row 7 : 24 September 1994 | Ipswich Town | A | 2 – 3 | 22,559 | 4th
row 8 : 1 October 1994 | Everton | H | 2 – 0 | 43,803 | 4th
row 9 : 8 October 1994 | Sheffield Wednesday | A | 0 – 1 | 33,441 | 5th
row 10 : 15 October 1994 | West Ham United | H | 1 – 0 | 43,795 | 4th
row 11 : 24 October 1994 | Blackburn Rovers | A | 4 – 2 | 30,260 | 3rd
row 12 : 29 October 1994 | Newcastle United | H | 2 – 0 | 43,795 | 3rd
row 13 : 6 November 1994 | Aston Villa | A | 2 – 1 | 32,136 | 3rd
row 14 : 10 November 1994 | Manchester City | H | 5 – 0 | 43,738 | 2nd
row 15 : 19 November 1994 | Crystal Palace | H | 3 – 0 | 43,788 | 1st
row 16 : 26 November 1994 | Arsenal | A | 0 – 0 | 38,301 | 2nd
row 17 : 3 December 1994 | Norwich City | H | 1 – 0 | 43,789 | 1st
row 18 : 10 December 1994 | Queens Park Rangers | A | 3 – 2 | 18,948 | 2nd
row 19 : 17 December 1994 | Nottingham Forest | H | 1 – 2 | 43,744 | 2nd
row 20 : 26 December 1994 | Chelsea | A | 3 – 2 | 31,161 | 2nd
row 21 : 28 December 1994 | Leicester City | H | 1 – 1 | 43,789 | 2nd
row 22 : 31 December 1994 | Southampton | A | 2 – 2 | 16,708 | 2nd
row 23 : 3 January 1995 | Coventry City | H | 2 – 0 | 43,130 | 2nd
row 24 : 15 January 1995 | Newcastle United | A | 1 – 1 | 34,471 | 2nd
row 25 : 22 January 1995 | Blackburn Rovers | H | 1 – 0 | 43,742 | 2nd
row 26 : 25 January 1995 | Crystal Palace | A | 1 – 1 | 18,224 | 2nd
row 27 : 4 February 1995 | Aston Villa | H | 1 – 0 | 43,795 | 2nd
row 28 : 11 February 1995 | Manchester City | A | 3 – 0 | 26,368 | 2nd
row 29 : 22 February 1995 | Norwich City | A | 2 – 0 | 21,824 | 1st
row 30 : 25 February 1995 | Everton | A | 0 – 1 | 40,011 | 2nd
row 31 : 4 March 1995 | Ipswich Town | H | 9 – 0 | 43,804 | 2nd
row 32 : 7 March 1995 | Wimbledon | A | 1 – 0 | 18,224 | 1st
row 33 : 15 March 1995 | Tottenham Hotspur | H | 0 – 0 | 43,802 | 2nd
row 34 : 19 March 1995 | Liverpool | A | 0 – 2 | 38,906 | 2nd
row 35 : 22 March 1995 | Arsenal | H | 3 – 0 | 43,623 | 2nd
row 36 : 2 April 1995 | Leeds United | H | 0 – 0 | 43,712 | 2nd
row 37 : 15 April 1995 | Leicester City | A | 4 – 0 | 21,281 | 2nd
row 38 : 17 April 1995 | Chelsea | H | 0 – 0 | 43,728 | 2nd
row 39 : 1 May 1995 | Coventry City | A | 3 – 2 | 21,885 | 2nd
row 40 : 7 May 1995 | Sheffield Wednesday | H | 1 – 0 | 43,868 | 2nd
row 41 : 10 May 1995 | Southampton | H | 2 – 1 | 43,479 | 2nd
row 42 : 14 May 1995 | West Ham United | A | 1 – 1 | 24,783 | 2nd [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What is the smallest Attendance with H / A of h, and Opponents of nottingham forest?

Answer: 43744.0
[Table] header: Place | Player | Country | Score | To par row 1 : 1 | Craig Stadler | United States | 64-70=134 | –8
row 2 : T2 | Lee Trevino | United States | 69-66=135 | –7
row 3 : T2 | Tom Watson | United States | 67-68=135 | –7
row 4 : 4 | Nick Faldo | England | 68-68=136 | –6
row 5 : 5 | Hale Irwin | United States | 69-68=137 | –5
row 6 : T6 | Raymond Floyd | United States | 72-66=138 | –4
row 7 : T6 | Terry Gale | Australia | 72-66=138 | –4
row 8 : T6 | Bill Rogers | United States | 67-71=138 | –4
row 9 : T9 | Andy Bean | United States | 70-69=139 | –3
row 10 : T9 | Denis Durnian | England | 73-66=139 | –3
row 11 : T9 | Bernhard Langer | West Germany | 67-72=139 | –3
row 12 : T9 | Graham Marsh | Australia | 69-70=139 | –3
row 13 : T9 | Hal Sutton | United States | 68-71=139 | –3 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What country has a place of 4?

Answer: England
[Table] header: Place | Player | Country | Score | To par row 1 : 1 | Jesper Parnevik | Sweden | 70-66-66=202 | –11
row 2 : 2 | Darren Clarke | Northern Ireland | 67-66-71=204 | –9
row 3 : T3 | Fred Couples | United States | 69-68-70=207 | –6
row 4 : T3 | Justin Leonard | United States | 69-66-72=207 | –6
row 5 : T5 | Stephen Ames | Trinidad and Tobago | 74-69-66=209 | –4
row 6 : T5 | Jim Furyk | United States | 67-72-70=209 | –4
row 7 : T5 | Eduardo Romero | Argentina | 74-68-67=209 | –4
row 8 : T8 | Robert Allenby | Australia | 76-68-66=210 | –3
row 9 : T8 | Lee Westwood | England | 73-70-67=210 | –3
row 10 : T8 | Tiger Woods | United States | 72-74-64=210 | –3 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What did the United States score in the T5?

Answer: 67-72-70=209
[Table] header: Place | Player | Country | Score | To par row 1 : 1 | Jesper Parnevik | Sweden | 70-66-66=202 | –11
row 2 : 2 | Darren Clarke | Northern Ireland | 67-66-71=204 | –9
row 3 : T3 | Fred Couples | United States | 69-68-70=207 | –6
row 4 : T3 | Justin Leonard | United States | 69-66-72=207 | –6
row 5 : T5 | Stephen Ames | Trinidad and Tobago | 74-69-66=209 | –4
row 6 : T5 | Jim Furyk | United States | 67-72-70=209 | –4
row 7 : T5 | Eduardo Romero | Argentina | 74-68-67=209 | –4
row 8 : T8 | Robert Allenby | Australia | 76-68-66=210 | –3
row 9 : T8 | Lee Westwood | England | 73-70-67=210 | –3
row 10 : T8 | Tiger Woods | United States | 72-74-64=210 | –3 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What was the to par at the T5 for the player with a score of 74-69-66=209?

Answer: –4
[Table] header: Place | Player | Country | Score | To par row 1 : 1 | Jesper Parnevik | Sweden | 70-66-66=202 | –11
row 2 : 2 | Darren Clarke | Northern Ireland | 67-66-71=204 | –9
row 3 : T3 | Fred Couples | United States | 69-68-70=207 | –6
row 4 : T3 | Justin Leonard | United States | 69-66-72=207 | –6
row 5 : T5 | Stephen Ames | Trinidad and Tobago | 74-69-66=209 | –4
row 6 : T5 | Jim Furyk | United States | 67-72-70=209 | –4
row 7 : T5 | Eduardo Romero | Argentina | 74-68-67=209 | –4
row 8 : T8 | Robert Allenby | Australia | 76-68-66=210 | –3
row 9 : T8 | Lee Westwood | England | 73-70-67=210 | –3
row 10 : T8 | Tiger Woods | United States | 72-74-64=210 | –3 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: Where did Trinidad and Tobago play?

Answer: T5
[Table] header: Place | Player | Country | Score | To par row 1 : 1 | Jesper Parnevik | Sweden | 70-66-66=202 | –11
row 2 : 2 | Darren Clarke | Northern Ireland | 67-66-71=204 | –9
row 3 : T3 | Fred Couples | United States | 69-68-70=207 | –6
row 4 : T3 | Justin Leonard | United States | 69-66-72=207 | –6
row 5 : T5 | Stephen Ames | Trinidad and Tobago | 74-69-66=209 | –4
row 6 : T5 | Jim Furyk | United States | 67-72-70=209 | –4
row 7 : T5 | Eduardo Romero | Argentina | 74-68-67=209 | –4
row 8 : T8 | Robert Allenby | Australia | 76-68-66=210 | –3
row 9 : T8 | Lee Westwood | England | 73-70-67=210 | –3
row 10 : T8 | Tiger Woods | United States | 72-74-64=210 | –3 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What was the to par for the game with a score of 74-69-66=209?

Answer: –4
[Table] header: Place | Player | Country | Score | To par row 1 : 1 | Jesper Parnevik | Sweden | 70-66-66=202 | –11
row 2 : 2 | Darren Clarke | Northern Ireland | 67-66-71=204 | –9
row 3 : T3 | Fred Couples | United States | 69-68-70=207 | –6
row 4 : T3 | Justin Leonard | United States | 69-66-72=207 | –6
row 5 : T5 | Stephen Ames | Trinidad and Tobago | 74-69-66=209 | –4
row 6 : T5 | Jim Furyk | United States | 67-72-70=209 | –4
row 7 : T5 | Eduardo Romero | Argentina | 74-68-67=209 | –4
row 8 : T8 | Robert Allenby | Australia | 76-68-66=210 | –3
row 9 : T8 | Lee Westwood | England | 73-70-67=210 | –3
row 10 : T8 | Tiger Woods | United States | 72-74-64=210 | –3 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: Where is Eduardo Romero from?

Answer: Argentina
[Table] header: Name | No. Specimens | Abbr. | Country | City row 1 : Estonian University of Life Sciences | 336,000 | TAA | Estonia | Tartu
row 2 : University of Tartu | 324,000 | TU | Estonia | Tartu
row 3 : Vilnius University | 300,000 | WI | Lithuania | Vilnius
row 4 : University of Latvia , Riga | 176,000 | RIG | Latvia | Riga
row 5 : University of Latvia , Salaspils | 175,000 | LATV | Latvia | Salaspils
row 6 : Institute of Botany, Lithuania | 130,000 | BILAS | Lithuania | Vilnius
row 7 : Estonian Museum of Natural History | 100,000 | TAM | Estonia | Tallinn
row 8 : Tallinn Botanic Garden | 85,000 | TALL | Estonia | Tallinn
row 9 : National Botanic Garden of Latvia | 50,000 | HBA | Latvia | Salaspils [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: In what city is the Estonian University of Life Sciences located?

Answer: Tartu
[Table] header: Name | No. Specimens | Abbr. | Country | City row 1 : Estonian University of Life Sciences | 336,000 | TAA | Estonia | Tartu
row 2 : University of Tartu | 324,000 | TU | Estonia | Tartu
row 3 : Vilnius University | 300,000 | WI | Lithuania | Vilnius
row 4 : University of Latvia , Riga | 176,000 | RIG | Latvia | Riga
row 5 : University of Latvia , Salaspils | 175,000 | LATV | Latvia | Salaspils
row 6 : Institute of Botany, Lithuania | 130,000 | BILAS | Lithuania | Vilnius
row 7 : Estonian Museum of Natural History | 100,000 | TAM | Estonia | Tallinn
row 8 : Tallinn Botanic Garden | 85,000 | TALL | Estonia | Tallinn
row 9 : National Botanic Garden of Latvia | 50,000 | HBA | Latvia | Salaspils [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What is the abbreviation for the University of Tartu?

Answer: TU
[Table] header: Place | Player | Country | Score | To par row 1 : T1 | Chad Campbell | United States | 69-72-65=206 | –4
row 2 : T1 | Shaun Micheel | United States | 69-68-69=206 | –4
row 3 : 3 | Mike Weir | Canada | 68-71-70=209 | –1
row 4 : 4 | Tim Clark | South Africa | 72-70-68=210 | E
row 5 : T5 | Billy Andrade | United States | 67-72-72=211 | +1
row 6 : T5 | Briny Baird | United States | 73-71-67=211 | +1
row 7 : T5 | Alex Čejka | Germany | 74-69-68=211 | +1
row 8 : T5 | Ernie Els | South Africa | 71-70-70=211 | +1
row 9 : T9 | Fred Funk | United States | 69-73-70=212 | +2
row 10 : T9 | Charles Howell III | United States | 70-72-70=212 | +2
row 11 : T9 | Vijay Singh | Fiji | 69-73-70=212 | +2 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What place is Fred Funk in?

Answer: T9
[Table] header: Tie no | Home team | Score | Away team | Attendance row 1 : 6 | Billingham Synthonia | 5–1 | Glasshoughton Welfare | 103
row 2 : 16 | Brandon United | 1–2 | Billingham Town | 70
row 3 : 18 | Stokesley SC | 2–0 | Washington | 148
row 4 : 33 | St Helens Town | 1–0 | Holker Old Boys | 83
row 5 : 35 | Nostell Miners Welfare | 3–0 | Winsford United | 135
row 6 : 37 | Flixton | 3–1† | Abbey Hey | 68
row 7 : 42 | AFC Blackpool | 1–4 | Congleton Town | 54
row 8 : 49 | Pilkington XXX | 2–1 | AFC Wulfrunians | 68
row 9 : 67 | Meir KA | 4–4 | Goodrich | 76
row 10 : Meir KA won 5–4 on | Meir KA won 5–4 on | Meir KA won 5–4 on | Meir KA won 5–4 on | Meir KA won 5–4 on
row 11 : 76 | Lye Town | 5–1 | Brocton | 252
row 12 : 84 | March Town United | 2–0 | Haverhill Rovers | 105
row 13 : 85 | Ipswich Wanderers | 2–0 | Stowmarket Town | 116
row 14 : 92 | Cornard United | 3–3 | Whitton United | 33
row 15 : Cornard United won 4–2 on penalties | Cornard United won 4–2 on penalties | Cornard United won 4–2 on penalties | Cornard United won 4–2 on penalties | Cornard United won 4–2 on penalties
row 16 : 98 | Norwich United | 1–3 | Wisbech Town | 114
row 17 : 101 | Harwich & Parkeston | 0–3 | Raunds Town | 131
row 18 : 108 | Saffron Walden Town | 2–1 | Desborough Town | 166
row 19 : 111 | Wellingborough Town | 2–0 | Kentish Town | 112
row 20 : 118 | Sporting Bengal United | 1–0 | London Colney | 98
row 21 : 126 | Royston Town | 4–0 | Wembley | 201
row 22 : 131 | Burnham Ramblers | 5–3 | Daventry United | 84
row 23 : 140 | Tunbridge Wells | 2–1 | Slade Green | 112
row 24 : 145 | Croydon | 4–3 | Whitehawk | 63
row 25 : 147 | Chichester City United | 3–1 | Crawley Down | 72
row 26 : 148 | Southwick | 1–3 | Cobham | 77
row 27 : 155 | Lordswood | 2–4 | Camberley Town | 52
row 28 : 157 | Deal Town | 1–2 | Chertsey Town | 104
row 29 : 159 | Raynes Park Vale | 3–1 | Horley Town | 72
row 30 : 162 | Hamble ASSC | 2–2 | Westbury United | 62
row 31 : Westbury United won 4–2 on penalties | Westbury United won 4–2 on penalties | Westbury United won 4–2 on penalties | Westbury United won 4–2 on penalties | Westbury United won 4–2 on penalties
row 32 : 171 | Marlow United | 2–2 | Hungerford Town | 59
row 33 : Marlow United won 4–2 on penalties | Marlow United won 4–2 on penalties | Marlow United won 4–2 on penalties | Marlow United won 4–2 on penalties | Marlow United won 4–2 on penalties
row 34 : 172 | Calne Town | 3–0 | Devizes Town | 76
row 35 : 176 | Bitton | 3–0 | Thame United | 82
row 36 : 184 | Wootton Bassett Town | 1–6 | Flackwell Heath | 97
row 37 : 187 | Street | 5–1 | Chard Town | 123
row 38 : 195 | Falmouth Town | 4–2 | Shaftesbury | 66
row 39 : 197 | Saltash United | 2–4 | Gillingham Town | 116
row 40 : 200 | Wimborne Town | 3–2 | Dawlish Town | 273 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What is Score, when Away Team is "Thame United"?

Answer: 3–0
[Table] header: Tie no | Home team | Score | Away team | Attendance row 1 : 6 | Billingham Synthonia | 5–1 | Glasshoughton Welfare | 103
row 2 : 16 | Brandon United | 1–2 | Billingham Town | 70
row 3 : 18 | Stokesley SC | 2–0 | Washington | 148
row 4 : 33 | St Helens Town | 1–0 | Holker Old Boys | 83
row 5 : 35 | Nostell Miners Welfare | 3–0 | Winsford United | 135
row 6 : 37 | Flixton | 3–1† | Abbey Hey | 68
row 7 : 42 | AFC Blackpool | 1–4 | Congleton Town | 54
row 8 : 49 | Pilkington XXX | 2–1 | AFC Wulfrunians | 68
row 9 : 67 | Meir KA | 4–4 | Goodrich | 76
row 10 : Meir KA won 5–4 on | Meir KA won 5–4 on | Meir KA won 5–4 on | Meir KA won 5–4 on | Meir KA won 5–4 on
row 11 : 76 | Lye Town | 5–1 | Brocton | 252
row 12 : 84 | March Town United | 2–0 | Haverhill Rovers | 105
row 13 : 85 | Ipswich Wanderers | 2–0 | Stowmarket Town | 116
row 14 : 92 | Cornard United | 3–3 | Whitton United | 33
row 15 : Cornard United won 4–2 on penalties | Cornard United won 4–2 on penalties | Cornard United won 4–2 on penalties | Cornard United won 4–2 on penalties | Cornard United won 4–2 on penalties
row 16 : 98 | Norwich United | 1–3 | Wisbech Town | 114
row 17 : 101 | Harwich & Parkeston | 0–3 | Raunds Town | 131
row 18 : 108 | Saffron Walden Town | 2–1 | Desborough Town | 166
row 19 : 111 | Wellingborough Town | 2–0 | Kentish Town | 112
row 20 : 118 | Sporting Bengal United | 1–0 | London Colney | 98
row 21 : 126 | Royston Town | 4–0 | Wembley | 201
row 22 : 131 | Burnham Ramblers | 5–3 | Daventry United | 84
row 23 : 140 | Tunbridge Wells | 2–1 | Slade Green | 112
row 24 : 145 | Croydon | 4–3 | Whitehawk | 63
row 25 : 147 | Chichester City United | 3–1 | Crawley Down | 72
row 26 : 148 | Southwick | 1–3 | Cobham | 77
row 27 : 155 | Lordswood | 2–4 | Camberley Town | 52
row 28 : 157 | Deal Town | 1–2 | Chertsey Town | 104
row 29 : 159 | Raynes Park Vale | 3–1 | Horley Town | 72
row 30 : 162 | Hamble ASSC | 2–2 | Westbury United | 62
row 31 : Westbury United won 4–2 on penalties | Westbury United won 4–2 on penalties | Westbury United won 4–2 on penalties | Westbury United won 4–2 on penalties | Westbury United won 4–2 on penalties
row 32 : 171 | Marlow United | 2–2 | Hungerford Town | 59
row 33 : Marlow United won 4–2 on penalties | Marlow United won 4–2 on penalties | Marlow United won 4–2 on penalties | Marlow United won 4–2 on penalties | Marlow United won 4–2 on penalties
row 34 : 172 | Calne Town | 3–0 | Devizes Town | 76
row 35 : 176 | Bitton | 3–0 | Thame United | 82
row 36 : 184 | Wootton Bassett Town | 1–6 | Flackwell Heath | 97
row 37 : 187 | Street | 5–1 | Chard Town | 123
row 38 : 195 | Falmouth Town | 4–2 | Shaftesbury | 66
row 39 : 197 | Saltash United | 2–4 | Gillingham Town | 116
row 40 : 200 | Wimborne Town | 3–2 | Dawlish Town | 273 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What is Score, when Attendance is "76", and when Home Team is "Meir Ka"?

Answer: 4–4
[Table] header: Tie no | Home team | Score | Away team | Attendance row 1 : 6 | Billingham Synthonia | 5–1 | Glasshoughton Welfare | 103
row 2 : 16 | Brandon United | 1–2 | Billingham Town | 70
row 3 : 18 | Stokesley SC | 2–0 | Washington | 148
row 4 : 33 | St Helens Town | 1–0 | Holker Old Boys | 83
row 5 : 35 | Nostell Miners Welfare | 3–0 | Winsford United | 135
row 6 : 37 | Flixton | 3–1† | Abbey Hey | 68
row 7 : 42 | AFC Blackpool | 1–4 | Congleton Town | 54
row 8 : 49 | Pilkington XXX | 2–1 | AFC Wulfrunians | 68
row 9 : 67 | Meir KA | 4–4 | Goodrich | 76
row 10 : Meir KA won 5–4 on | Meir KA won 5–4 on | Meir KA won 5–4 on | Meir KA won 5–4 on | Meir KA won 5–4 on
row 11 : 76 | Lye Town | 5–1 | Brocton | 252
row 12 : 84 | March Town United | 2–0 | Haverhill Rovers | 105
row 13 : 85 | Ipswich Wanderers | 2–0 | Stowmarket Town | 116
row 14 : 92 | Cornard United | 3–3 | Whitton United | 33
row 15 : Cornard United won 4–2 on penalties | Cornard United won 4–2 on penalties | Cornard United won 4–2 on penalties | Cornard United won 4–2 on penalties | Cornard United won 4–2 on penalties
row 16 : 98 | Norwich United | 1–3 | Wisbech Town | 114
row 17 : 101 | Harwich & Parkeston | 0–3 | Raunds Town | 131
row 18 : 108 | Saffron Walden Town | 2–1 | Desborough Town | 166
row 19 : 111 | Wellingborough Town | 2–0 | Kentish Town | 112
row 20 : 118 | Sporting Bengal United | 1–0 | London Colney | 98
row 21 : 126 | Royston Town | 4–0 | Wembley | 201
row 22 : 131 | Burnham Ramblers | 5–3 | Daventry United | 84
row 23 : 140 | Tunbridge Wells | 2–1 | Slade Green | 112
row 24 : 145 | Croydon | 4–3 | Whitehawk | 63
row 25 : 147 | Chichester City United | 3–1 | Crawley Down | 72
row 26 : 148 | Southwick | 1–3 | Cobham | 77
row 27 : 155 | Lordswood | 2–4 | Camberley Town | 52
row 28 : 157 | Deal Town | 1–2 | Chertsey Town | 104
row 29 : 159 | Raynes Park Vale | 3–1 | Horley Town | 72
row 30 : 162 | Hamble ASSC | 2–2 | Westbury United | 62
row 31 : Westbury United won 4–2 on penalties | Westbury United won 4–2 on penalties | Westbury United won 4–2 on penalties | Westbury United won 4–2 on penalties | Westbury United won 4–2 on penalties
row 32 : 171 | Marlow United | 2–2 | Hungerford Town | 59
row 33 : Marlow United won 4–2 on penalties | Marlow United won 4–2 on penalties | Marlow United won 4–2 on penalties | Marlow United won 4–2 on penalties | Marlow United won 4–2 on penalties
row 34 : 172 | Calne Town | 3–0 | Devizes Town | 76
row 35 : 176 | Bitton | 3–0 | Thame United | 82
row 36 : 184 | Wootton Bassett Town | 1–6 | Flackwell Heath | 97
row 37 : 187 | Street | 5–1 | Chard Town | 123
row 38 : 195 | Falmouth Town | 4–2 | Shaftesbury | 66
row 39 : 197 | Saltash United | 2–4 | Gillingham Town | 116
row 40 : 200 | Wimborne Town | 3–2 | Dawlish Town | 273 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What is Tie No, when Score is "Marlow United won 4–2 on penalties"?

Answer: Marlow United won 4–2 on penalties