sail/symbolic-instruction-tuning huggingface dataset:
[Table] header: Position | Name | Birthdate | Birthplace | Team row 1 : G | Raymond Bonney | 2 April 1892 | Phoenix, New York | St. Paul A.C.
row 2 : G | Cyril Weidenborner | 30 March 1895 | Saint Paul, Minnesota | St. Paul A.C.
row 3 : D | Edward Fitzgerald | 3 August 1890 | Northfield, Minnesota | St. Paul A.C.
row 4 : D | Moose Goheen | 9 February 1894 | White Bear Lake, Minnesota | St. Paul A.C.
row 5 : D | Leon Tuck | 25 May 1891 | Melrose, Massachusetts | Boston AA
row 6 : Rover | Herbert Drury | 2 March 1896 | Midland, Ontario | Pittsburgh AA
row 7 : F | Frank Synott | 28 December 1891 | Chatham, New Brunswick | Boston AA
row 8 : LW | Anthony Conroy | 19 October 1895 | Saint Paul, Minnesota | St. Paul A.C.
row 9 : C | George Geran | 3 August 1896 | Holyoke, Massachusetts | Boston AA
row 10 : C | Lawrence McCormick | 12 July 1890 | Buckingham, Quebec | Pittsburgh AA
row 11 : RW | Joseph McCormick | 12 August 1894 | Buckingham, Quebec | Pittsburgh AA [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What is the Name when the team is the st. paul a.c., with a Birthdate of 3 august 1890?

Answer: Edward Fitzgerald
[Table] header: Position | Name | Birthdate | Birthplace | Team row 1 : G | Raymond Bonney | 2 April 1892 | Phoenix, New York | St. Paul A.C.
row 2 : G | Cyril Weidenborner | 30 March 1895 | Saint Paul, Minnesota | St. Paul A.C.
row 3 : D | Edward Fitzgerald | 3 August 1890 | Northfield, Minnesota | St. Paul A.C.
row 4 : D | Moose Goheen | 9 February 1894 | White Bear Lake, Minnesota | St. Paul A.C.
row 5 : D | Leon Tuck | 25 May 1891 | Melrose, Massachusetts | Boston AA
row 6 : Rover | Herbert Drury | 2 March 1896 | Midland, Ontario | Pittsburgh AA
row 7 : F | Frank Synott | 28 December 1891 | Chatham, New Brunswick | Boston AA
row 8 : LW | Anthony Conroy | 19 October 1895 | Saint Paul, Minnesota | St. Paul A.C.
row 9 : C | George Geran | 3 August 1896 | Holyoke, Massachusetts | Boston AA
row 10 : C | Lawrence McCormick | 12 July 1890 | Buckingham, Quebec | Pittsburgh AA
row 11 : RW | Joseph McCormick | 12 August 1894 | Buckingham, Quebec | Pittsburgh AA [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What is the Position of moose goheen?

Answer: D
[Table] header: Position | Name | Birthdate | Birthplace | Team row 1 : G | Raymond Bonney | 2 April 1892 | Phoenix, New York | St. Paul A.C.
row 2 : G | Cyril Weidenborner | 30 March 1895 | Saint Paul, Minnesota | St. Paul A.C.
row 3 : D | Edward Fitzgerald | 3 August 1890 | Northfield, Minnesota | St. Paul A.C.
row 4 : D | Moose Goheen | 9 February 1894 | White Bear Lake, Minnesota | St. Paul A.C.
row 5 : D | Leon Tuck | 25 May 1891 | Melrose, Massachusetts | Boston AA
row 6 : Rover | Herbert Drury | 2 March 1896 | Midland, Ontario | Pittsburgh AA
row 7 : F | Frank Synott | 28 December 1891 | Chatham, New Brunswick | Boston AA
row 8 : LW | Anthony Conroy | 19 October 1895 | Saint Paul, Minnesota | St. Paul A.C.
row 9 : C | George Geran | 3 August 1896 | Holyoke, Massachusetts | Boston AA
row 10 : C | Lawrence McCormick | 12 July 1890 | Buckingham, Quebec | Pittsburgh AA
row 11 : RW | Joseph McCormick | 12 August 1894 | Buckingham, Quebec | Pittsburgh AA [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What is the Birthdate of leon tuck?

Answer: 25 May 1891
[Table] header: Tournament | 1995 | 1996 | 1997 | 1998 | 1999 | 2000 | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 row 1 : Australian Open | A | 1R | 2R | A | 3R | 2R | A | SF | 3R | 3R | A | A
row 2 : French Open | A | 2R | A | 1R | 2R | 1R | 3R | 3R | 4R | 2R | 2R | 1R
row 3 : Wimbledon | A | 2R | 1R | 1R | 2R | 1R | 2R | 2R | 3R | 1R | 3R | 1R
row 4 : US Open | 1R | 2R | 2R | 1R | 4R | 3R | 3R | 4R | 3R | 3R | 2R | 4R
row 5 : Win–Loss | 0–1 | 3–4 | 2–3 | 0–3 | 7–4 | 3–4 | 5–3 | 11–4 | 9–4 | 5–4 | 4–2 | 3–3
row 6 : Indian Wells Masters | A | 1R | 2R | A | 1R | 1R | A | 2R | 2R | 3R | 3R | A
row 7 : Miami Masters | A | A | 2R | 1R | 1R | 3R | 1R | 3R | 2R | 3R | 4R | A
row 8 : Monte Carlo Masters | A | 2R | A | A | 3R | 2R | 1R | 3R | 2R | 1R | 2R | A
row 9 : Rome Masters | A | A | A | A | A | 2R | A | SF | 3R | QF | 1R | 1R
row 10 : Hamburg Masters | A | A | A | A | 3R | 1R | A | 3R | 1R | 1R | 3R | 1R
row 11 : Canada Masters | A | 2R | A | A | 3R | SF | 1R | SF | 3R | 2R | 2R | A
row 12 : Cincinnati Masters | A | A | 3R | A | 3R | 2R | 2R | 1R | 1R | 1R | 1R | A
row 13 : Madrid Masters | A | A | A | A | 3R | 1R | 3R | F | 3R | 2R | 1R | A
row 14 : Paris Masters | A | A | A | A | 1R | 1R | QF | 2R | SF | 2R | 1R | A
row 15 : Tennis Masters Cup | A | A | A | A | A | A | A | RR | A | A | A | A
row 16 : Titles | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0
row 17 : Year End Ranking | 53 | 52 | 48 | 75 | 36 | 53 | 29 | 7 | 13 | 24 | 48 | 129 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: During the Tournament in which Jiří Novák was absent(A) in 1995, absent(A) in 1997, and made it to the 3rd round (3R) in 2003, how did he do in 2006?

Answer: 1R, A, A
[Table] header: Tournament | 1995 | 1996 | 1997 | 1998 | 1999 | 2000 | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 row 1 : Australian Open | A | 1R | 2R | A | 3R | 2R | A | SF | 3R | 3R | A | A
row 2 : French Open | A | 2R | A | 1R | 2R | 1R | 3R | 3R | 4R | 2R | 2R | 1R
row 3 : Wimbledon | A | 2R | 1R | 1R | 2R | 1R | 2R | 2R | 3R | 1R | 3R | 1R
row 4 : US Open | 1R | 2R | 2R | 1R | 4R | 3R | 3R | 4R | 3R | 3R | 2R | 4R
row 5 : Win–Loss | 0–1 | 3–4 | 2–3 | 0–3 | 7–4 | 3–4 | 5–3 | 11–4 | 9–4 | 5–4 | 4–2 | 3–3
row 6 : Indian Wells Masters | A | 1R | 2R | A | 1R | 1R | A | 2R | 2R | 3R | 3R | A
row 7 : Miami Masters | A | A | 2R | 1R | 1R | 3R | 1R | 3R | 2R | 3R | 4R | A
row 8 : Monte Carlo Masters | A | 2R | A | A | 3R | 2R | 1R | 3R | 2R | 1R | 2R | A
row 9 : Rome Masters | A | A | A | A | A | 2R | A | SF | 3R | QF | 1R | 1R
row 10 : Hamburg Masters | A | A | A | A | 3R | 1R | A | 3R | 1R | 1R | 3R | 1R
row 11 : Canada Masters | A | 2R | A | A | 3R | SF | 1R | SF | 3R | 2R | 2R | A
row 12 : Cincinnati Masters | A | A | 3R | A | 3R | 2R | 2R | 1R | 1R | 1R | 1R | A
row 13 : Madrid Masters | A | A | A | A | 3R | 1R | 3R | F | 3R | 2R | 1R | A
row 14 : Paris Masters | A | A | A | A | 1R | 1R | QF | 2R | SF | 2R | 1R | A
row 15 : Tennis Masters Cup | A | A | A | A | A | A | A | RR | A | A | A | A
row 16 : Titles | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0
row 17 : Year End Ranking | 53 | 52 | 48 | 75 | 36 | 53 | 29 | 7 | 13 | 24 | 48 | 129 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: In the Tennis Masters Cup, how did Jiří Novák do in 1997?

Answer: A
[Table] header: Tournament | 1995 | 1996 | 1997 | 1998 | 1999 | 2000 | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 row 1 : Australian Open | A | 1R | 2R | A | 3R | 2R | A | SF | 3R | 3R | A | A
row 2 : French Open | A | 2R | A | 1R | 2R | 1R | 3R | 3R | 4R | 2R | 2R | 1R
row 3 : Wimbledon | A | 2R | 1R | 1R | 2R | 1R | 2R | 2R | 3R | 1R | 3R | 1R
row 4 : US Open | 1R | 2R | 2R | 1R | 4R | 3R | 3R | 4R | 3R | 3R | 2R | 4R
row 5 : Win–Loss | 0–1 | 3–4 | 2–3 | 0–3 | 7–4 | 3–4 | 5–3 | 11–4 | 9–4 | 5–4 | 4–2 | 3–3
row 6 : Indian Wells Masters | A | 1R | 2R | A | 1R | 1R | A | 2R | 2R | 3R | 3R | A
row 7 : Miami Masters | A | A | 2R | 1R | 1R | 3R | 1R | 3R | 2R | 3R | 4R | A
row 8 : Monte Carlo Masters | A | 2R | A | A | 3R | 2R | 1R | 3R | 2R | 1R | 2R | A
row 9 : Rome Masters | A | A | A | A | A | 2R | A | SF | 3R | QF | 1R | 1R
row 10 : Hamburg Masters | A | A | A | A | 3R | 1R | A | 3R | 1R | 1R | 3R | 1R
row 11 : Canada Masters | A | 2R | A | A | 3R | SF | 1R | SF | 3R | 2R | 2R | A
row 12 : Cincinnati Masters | A | A | 3R | A | 3R | 2R | 2R | 1R | 1R | 1R | 1R | A
row 13 : Madrid Masters | A | A | A | A | 3R | 1R | 3R | F | 3R | 2R | 1R | A
row 14 : Paris Masters | A | A | A | A | 1R | 1R | QF | 2R | SF | 2R | 1R | A
row 15 : Tennis Masters Cup | A | A | A | A | A | A | A | RR | A | A | A | A
row 16 : Titles | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0
row 17 : Year End Ranking | 53 | 52 | 48 | 75 | 36 | 53 | 29 | 7 | 13 | 24 | 48 | 129 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: In the Hamburg Masters Tournament, during which Jiří Novák was absent(A) in 1996, how did he do in 2003?

Answer: 1R
[Table] header: Tournament | 1995 | 1996 | 1997 | 1998 | 1999 | 2000 | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 row 1 : Australian Open | A | 1R | 2R | A | 3R | 2R | A | SF | 3R | 3R | A | A
row 2 : French Open | A | 2R | A | 1R | 2R | 1R | 3R | 3R | 4R | 2R | 2R | 1R
row 3 : Wimbledon | A | 2R | 1R | 1R | 2R | 1R | 2R | 2R | 3R | 1R | 3R | 1R
row 4 : US Open | 1R | 2R | 2R | 1R | 4R | 3R | 3R | 4R | 3R | 3R | 2R | 4R
row 5 : Win–Loss | 0–1 | 3–4 | 2–3 | 0–3 | 7–4 | 3–4 | 5–3 | 11–4 | 9–4 | 5–4 | 4–2 | 3–3
row 6 : Indian Wells Masters | A | 1R | 2R | A | 1R | 1R | A | 2R | 2R | 3R | 3R | A
row 7 : Miami Masters | A | A | 2R | 1R | 1R | 3R | 1R | 3R | 2R | 3R | 4R | A
row 8 : Monte Carlo Masters | A | 2R | A | A | 3R | 2R | 1R | 3R | 2R | 1R | 2R | A
row 9 : Rome Masters | A | A | A | A | A | 2R | A | SF | 3R | QF | 1R | 1R
row 10 : Hamburg Masters | A | A | A | A | 3R | 1R | A | 3R | 1R | 1R | 3R | 1R
row 11 : Canada Masters | A | 2R | A | A | 3R | SF | 1R | SF | 3R | 2R | 2R | A
row 12 : Cincinnati Masters | A | A | 3R | A | 3R | 2R | 2R | 1R | 1R | 1R | 1R | A
row 13 : Madrid Masters | A | A | A | A | 3R | 1R | 3R | F | 3R | 2R | 1R | A
row 14 : Paris Masters | A | A | A | A | 1R | 1R | QF | 2R | SF | 2R | 1R | A
row 15 : Tennis Masters Cup | A | A | A | A | A | A | A | RR | A | A | A | A
row 16 : Titles | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0
row 17 : Year End Ranking | 53 | 52 | 48 | 75 | 36 | 53 | 29 | 7 | 13 | 24 | 48 | 129 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: In the Tournament during which Jiří Novák was absent(A) in 2004, how did he do in 2003?

Answer: A
[Table] header: Tournament | 1995 | 1996 | 1997 | 1998 | 1999 | 2000 | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 row 1 : Australian Open | A | 1R | 2R | A | 3R | 2R | A | SF | 3R | 3R | A | A
row 2 : French Open | A | 2R | A | 1R | 2R | 1R | 3R | 3R | 4R | 2R | 2R | 1R
row 3 : Wimbledon | A | 2R | 1R | 1R | 2R | 1R | 2R | 2R | 3R | 1R | 3R | 1R
row 4 : US Open | 1R | 2R | 2R | 1R | 4R | 3R | 3R | 4R | 3R | 3R | 2R | 4R
row 5 : Win–Loss | 0–1 | 3–4 | 2–3 | 0–3 | 7–4 | 3–4 | 5–3 | 11–4 | 9–4 | 5–4 | 4–2 | 3–3
row 6 : Indian Wells Masters | A | 1R | 2R | A | 1R | 1R | A | 2R | 2R | 3R | 3R | A
row 7 : Miami Masters | A | A | 2R | 1R | 1R | 3R | 1R | 3R | 2R | 3R | 4R | A
row 8 : Monte Carlo Masters | A | 2R | A | A | 3R | 2R | 1R | 3R | 2R | 1R | 2R | A
row 9 : Rome Masters | A | A | A | A | A | 2R | A | SF | 3R | QF | 1R | 1R
row 10 : Hamburg Masters | A | A | A | A | 3R | 1R | A | 3R | 1R | 1R | 3R | 1R
row 11 : Canada Masters | A | 2R | A | A | 3R | SF | 1R | SF | 3R | 2R | 2R | A
row 12 : Cincinnati Masters | A | A | 3R | A | 3R | 2R | 2R | 1R | 1R | 1R | 1R | A
row 13 : Madrid Masters | A | A | A | A | 3R | 1R | 3R | F | 3R | 2R | 1R | A
row 14 : Paris Masters | A | A | A | A | 1R | 1R | QF | 2R | SF | 2R | 1R | A
row 15 : Tennis Masters Cup | A | A | A | A | A | A | A | RR | A | A | A | A
row 16 : Titles | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0
row 17 : Year End Ranking | 53 | 52 | 48 | 75 | 36 | 53 | 29 | 7 | 13 | 24 | 48 | 129 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: In the Tournament during which Jiří Novák made it to the 1st round(1R) in 1995, how did he do in 2001?

Answer: 3R
[Table] header: Tournament | 1995 | 1996 | 1997 | 1998 | 1999 | 2000 | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 row 1 : Australian Open | A | 1R | 2R | A | 3R | 2R | A | SF | 3R | 3R | A | A
row 2 : French Open | A | 2R | A | 1R | 2R | 1R | 3R | 3R | 4R | 2R | 2R | 1R
row 3 : Wimbledon | A | 2R | 1R | 1R | 2R | 1R | 2R | 2R | 3R | 1R | 3R | 1R
row 4 : US Open | 1R | 2R | 2R | 1R | 4R | 3R | 3R | 4R | 3R | 3R | 2R | 4R
row 5 : Win–Loss | 0–1 | 3–4 | 2–3 | 0–3 | 7–4 | 3–4 | 5–3 | 11–4 | 9–4 | 5–4 | 4–2 | 3–3
row 6 : Indian Wells Masters | A | 1R | 2R | A | 1R | 1R | A | 2R | 2R | 3R | 3R | A
row 7 : Miami Masters | A | A | 2R | 1R | 1R | 3R | 1R | 3R | 2R | 3R | 4R | A
row 8 : Monte Carlo Masters | A | 2R | A | A | 3R | 2R | 1R | 3R | 2R | 1R | 2R | A
row 9 : Rome Masters | A | A | A | A | A | 2R | A | SF | 3R | QF | 1R | 1R
row 10 : Hamburg Masters | A | A | A | A | 3R | 1R | A | 3R | 1R | 1R | 3R | 1R
row 11 : Canada Masters | A | 2R | A | A | 3R | SF | 1R | SF | 3R | 2R | 2R | A
row 12 : Cincinnati Masters | A | A | 3R | A | 3R | 2R | 2R | 1R | 1R | 1R | 1R | A
row 13 : Madrid Masters | A | A | A | A | 3R | 1R | 3R | F | 3R | 2R | 1R | A
row 14 : Paris Masters | A | A | A | A | 1R | 1R | QF | 2R | SF | 2R | 1R | A
row 15 : Tennis Masters Cup | A | A | A | A | A | A | A | RR | A | A | A | A
row 16 : Titles | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0
row 17 : Year End Ranking | 53 | 52 | 48 | 75 | 36 | 53 | 29 | 7 | 13 | 24 | 48 | 129 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: During the Hamburg Masters Tournament, during which Jiří Novák was absent(A) in 1998, how did he do in 1997?

Answer: A
[Table] header: Administrative Panel | Agricultural Panel | Cultural and Educational Panel | Industrial and Commercial Panel | Labour Panel | National University of Ireland | University of Dublin | Nominated by the Taoiseach | Total row 1 : 4 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 22
row 2 : 2 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 10
row 3 : 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7
row 4 : 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1
row 5 : 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 11
row 6 : 7 | 11 | 5 | 9 | 11 | 3 | 3 | 11 | 60 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What is the sum of all from the Cultural and Educational Panel with less than 7 from the Labour Panel and less than 1 from the Agricultural Panel?

Answer: none
[Table] header: Home team | Away team | Match score | "Pick The Winners" score | FootyTAB winner row 1 : Canberra | St. George | Canberra 8 St. George 22 | Canberra 8 St. George 29.5 | St. George
row 2 : Balmain | Canterbury | Balmain 14 Canterbury 19 | Balmain 20.5 Canterbury 19 | Balmain
row 3 : Newcastle | Easts | Newcastle 10 Easts 20 | Newcastle 10 Easts 25.5 | Easts
row 4 : Norths | Manly | Norths 19 Manly 4 | Norths 20.5 Manly 4 | Norths
row 5 : Penrith | Parramatta | Penrith 10 Parramatta 11 | Penrith 10 Parramatta 18.5 | Parramatta
row 6 : Cronulla | Brisbane | Cronulla 10 Brisbane 19 | Cronulla 19.5 Brisbane 19 | Cronulla
row 7 : Wests | Gold Coast | Wests 14 Gold Coast 10 | Wests 14 Gold Coast 19.5 | Gold Coast
row 8 : Illawarra | Souths | Illawarra 19 Souths 0 | Illawarra 19 Souths 5.5 | Illawarra [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What is the Home team when the "Pick The Winners" score was newcastle 10 easts 25.5?

Answer: Newcastle
[Table] header: Home team | Away team | Match score | "Pick The Winners" score | FootyTAB winner row 1 : Canberra | St. George | Canberra 8 St. George 22 | Canberra 8 St. George 29.5 | St. George
row 2 : Balmain | Canterbury | Balmain 14 Canterbury 19 | Balmain 20.5 Canterbury 19 | Balmain
row 3 : Newcastle | Easts | Newcastle 10 Easts 20 | Newcastle 10 Easts 25.5 | Easts
row 4 : Norths | Manly | Norths 19 Manly 4 | Norths 20.5 Manly 4 | Norths
row 5 : Penrith | Parramatta | Penrith 10 Parramatta 11 | Penrith 10 Parramatta 18.5 | Parramatta
row 6 : Cronulla | Brisbane | Cronulla 10 Brisbane 19 | Cronulla 19.5 Brisbane 19 | Cronulla
row 7 : Wests | Gold Coast | Wests 14 Gold Coast 10 | Wests 14 Gold Coast 19.5 | Gold Coast
row 8 : Illawarra | Souths | Illawarra 19 Souths 0 | Illawarra 19 Souths 5.5 | Illawarra [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What is the Away team when the FootyTAB winner was st. george?

Answer: St. George
[Table] header: Home team | Away team | Match score | "Pick The Winners" score | FootyTAB winner row 1 : Canberra | St. George | Canberra 8 St. George 22 | Canberra 8 St. George 29.5 | St. George
row 2 : Balmain | Canterbury | Balmain 14 Canterbury 19 | Balmain 20.5 Canterbury 19 | Balmain
row 3 : Newcastle | Easts | Newcastle 10 Easts 20 | Newcastle 10 Easts 25.5 | Easts
row 4 : Norths | Manly | Norths 19 Manly 4 | Norths 20.5 Manly 4 | Norths
row 5 : Penrith | Parramatta | Penrith 10 Parramatta 11 | Penrith 10 Parramatta 18.5 | Parramatta
row 6 : Cronulla | Brisbane | Cronulla 10 Brisbane 19 | Cronulla 19.5 Brisbane 19 | Cronulla
row 7 : Wests | Gold Coast | Wests 14 Gold Coast 10 | Wests 14 Gold Coast 19.5 | Gold Coast
row 8 : Illawarra | Souths | Illawarra 19 Souths 0 | Illawarra 19 Souths 5.5 | Illawarra [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What is the Home team when the away team was Manly?

Answer: Norths
[Table] header: Home team | Away team | Match score | "Pick The Winners" score | FootyTAB winner row 1 : Canberra | St. George | Canberra 8 St. George 22 | Canberra 8 St. George 29.5 | St. George
row 2 : Balmain | Canterbury | Balmain 14 Canterbury 19 | Balmain 20.5 Canterbury 19 | Balmain
row 3 : Newcastle | Easts | Newcastle 10 Easts 20 | Newcastle 10 Easts 25.5 | Easts
row 4 : Norths | Manly | Norths 19 Manly 4 | Norths 20.5 Manly 4 | Norths
row 5 : Penrith | Parramatta | Penrith 10 Parramatta 11 | Penrith 10 Parramatta 18.5 | Parramatta
row 6 : Cronulla | Brisbane | Cronulla 10 Brisbane 19 | Cronulla 19.5 Brisbane 19 | Cronulla
row 7 : Wests | Gold Coast | Wests 14 Gold Coast 10 | Wests 14 Gold Coast 19.5 | Gold Coast
row 8 : Illawarra | Souths | Illawarra 19 Souths 0 | Illawarra 19 Souths 5.5 | Illawarra [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What is the Match score when the FootyTAB winner was norths?

Answer: Norths 19 Manly 4
[Table] header: Home team | Away team | Match score | "Pick The Winners" score | FootyTAB winner row 1 : Canberra | St. George | Canberra 8 St. George 22 | Canberra 8 St. George 29.5 | St. George
row 2 : Balmain | Canterbury | Balmain 14 Canterbury 19 | Balmain 20.5 Canterbury 19 | Balmain
row 3 : Newcastle | Easts | Newcastle 10 Easts 20 | Newcastle 10 Easts 25.5 | Easts
row 4 : Norths | Manly | Norths 19 Manly 4 | Norths 20.5 Manly 4 | Norths
row 5 : Penrith | Parramatta | Penrith 10 Parramatta 11 | Penrith 10 Parramatta 18.5 | Parramatta
row 6 : Cronulla | Brisbane | Cronulla 10 Brisbane 19 | Cronulla 19.5 Brisbane 19 | Cronulla
row 7 : Wests | Gold Coast | Wests 14 Gold Coast 10 | Wests 14 Gold Coast 19.5 | Gold Coast
row 8 : Illawarra | Souths | Illawarra 19 Souths 0 | Illawarra 19 Souths 5.5 | Illawarra [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What is the Away team when the match score was norths 19 manly 4?

Answer: Manly
[Table] header: Home team | Away team | Match score | "Pick The Winners" score | FootyTAB winner row 1 : Canberra | St. George | Canberra 8 St. George 22 | Canberra 8 St. George 29.5 | St. George
row 2 : Balmain | Canterbury | Balmain 14 Canterbury 19 | Balmain 20.5 Canterbury 19 | Balmain
row 3 : Newcastle | Easts | Newcastle 10 Easts 20 | Newcastle 10 Easts 25.5 | Easts
row 4 : Norths | Manly | Norths 19 Manly 4 | Norths 20.5 Manly 4 | Norths
row 5 : Penrith | Parramatta | Penrith 10 Parramatta 11 | Penrith 10 Parramatta 18.5 | Parramatta
row 6 : Cronulla | Brisbane | Cronulla 10 Brisbane 19 | Cronulla 19.5 Brisbane 19 | Cronulla
row 7 : Wests | Gold Coast | Wests 14 Gold Coast 10 | Wests 14 Gold Coast 19.5 | Gold Coast
row 8 : Illawarra | Souths | Illawarra 19 Souths 0 | Illawarra 19 Souths 5.5 | Illawarra [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What is the "Pick The Winners" score when the Match score was illawarra 19 souths 0?

Answer: Illawarra 19 Souths 5.5
[Table] header: Player | FG Pct | 3FGM | 3FGA | 3FG Pct | FT Pct | Off Reb | Def Reb | Total Reb | Asst row 1 : Harangody | 51.5 | 3 | 8 | 37.5 | 76.7 | 103 | 212 | 315 | 53
row 2 : McAlarney | 43.6 | 103 | 230 | 44.8 | 82.3 | 7 | 56 | 62 | 110
row 3 : Kurz | 45.5 | 37 | 93 | 39.8 | 85.1 | 61 | 170 | 231 | 61
row 4 : Jackson | 39.1 | 17 | 59 | 28.8 | 51.0 | 54 | 102 | 156 | 189
row 5 : Ayers | 46.6 | 53 | 114 | 46.5 | 75.0 | 22 | 80 | 102 | 38
row 6 : Hillesland | 50.0 | 1 | 2 | 50.0 | 68.6 | 43 | 109 | 152 | 74
row 7 : Zeller | 43.2 | 31 | 80 | 38.8 | 53.8 | 27 | 43 | 70 | 14
row 8 : Peoples | 44.2 | 13 | 36 | 36.1 | 83.3 | 22 | 30 | 52 | 37
row 9 : Abromaitis | 26.3 | 1 | 8 | 12.5 | 100.0 | 4 | 5 | 9 | 3
row 10 : Proffitt | 42.9 | 2 | 5 | 40.0 | 0.00 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 2
row 11 : Andree | 100.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 100.0 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 1
row 12 : Nash | 46.2 | 0 | 1 | 0.00 | 27.3 | 8 | 12 | 20 | 5
row 13 : Kopko | 50.0 | 1 | 3 | 33.3 | 0.00 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0
row 14 : Total | 45.9 | 262 | 639 | 41.0 | 73.6 | 413 | 878 | 1291 | 587 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What is the sum FG Pct of the player with more than 3 asst, a def reb of 30, and a 3FG Pct greater than 36.1?

Answer: none
[Table] header: Player | FG Pct | 3FGM | 3FGA | 3FG Pct | FT Pct | Off Reb | Def Reb | Total Reb | Asst row 1 : Harangody | 51.5 | 3 | 8 | 37.5 | 76.7 | 103 | 212 | 315 | 53
row 2 : McAlarney | 43.6 | 103 | 230 | 44.8 | 82.3 | 7 | 56 | 62 | 110
row 3 : Kurz | 45.5 | 37 | 93 | 39.8 | 85.1 | 61 | 170 | 231 | 61
row 4 : Jackson | 39.1 | 17 | 59 | 28.8 | 51.0 | 54 | 102 | 156 | 189
row 5 : Ayers | 46.6 | 53 | 114 | 46.5 | 75.0 | 22 | 80 | 102 | 38
row 6 : Hillesland | 50.0 | 1 | 2 | 50.0 | 68.6 | 43 | 109 | 152 | 74
row 7 : Zeller | 43.2 | 31 | 80 | 38.8 | 53.8 | 27 | 43 | 70 | 14
row 8 : Peoples | 44.2 | 13 | 36 | 36.1 | 83.3 | 22 | 30 | 52 | 37
row 9 : Abromaitis | 26.3 | 1 | 8 | 12.5 | 100.0 | 4 | 5 | 9 | 3
row 10 : Proffitt | 42.9 | 2 | 5 | 40.0 | 0.00 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 2
row 11 : Andree | 100.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 100.0 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 1
row 12 : Nash | 46.2 | 0 | 1 | 0.00 | 27.3 | 8 | 12 | 20 | 5
row 13 : Kopko | 50.0 | 1 | 3 | 33.3 | 0.00 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0
row 14 : Total | 45.9 | 262 | 639 | 41.0 | 73.6 | 413 | 878 | 1291 | 587 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What is the total 3FG Pct of the player with a FG Pct greater than 43.2, a FT Pct less than 100, a total reb less than 102, and a 3FGM of 1?

Answer: 1.0
[Table] header: Player | FG Pct | 3FGM | 3FGA | 3FG Pct | FT Pct | Off Reb | Def Reb | Total Reb | Asst row 1 : Harangody | 51.5 | 3 | 8 | 37.5 | 76.7 | 103 | 212 | 315 | 53
row 2 : McAlarney | 43.6 | 103 | 230 | 44.8 | 82.3 | 7 | 56 | 62 | 110
row 3 : Kurz | 45.5 | 37 | 93 | 39.8 | 85.1 | 61 | 170 | 231 | 61
row 4 : Jackson | 39.1 | 17 | 59 | 28.8 | 51.0 | 54 | 102 | 156 | 189
row 5 : Ayers | 46.6 | 53 | 114 | 46.5 | 75.0 | 22 | 80 | 102 | 38
row 6 : Hillesland | 50.0 | 1 | 2 | 50.0 | 68.6 | 43 | 109 | 152 | 74
row 7 : Zeller | 43.2 | 31 | 80 | 38.8 | 53.8 | 27 | 43 | 70 | 14
row 8 : Peoples | 44.2 | 13 | 36 | 36.1 | 83.3 | 22 | 30 | 52 | 37
row 9 : Abromaitis | 26.3 | 1 | 8 | 12.5 | 100.0 | 4 | 5 | 9 | 3
row 10 : Proffitt | 42.9 | 2 | 5 | 40.0 | 0.00 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 2
row 11 : Andree | 100.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 100.0 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 1
row 12 : Nash | 46.2 | 0 | 1 | 0.00 | 27.3 | 8 | 12 | 20 | 5
row 13 : Kopko | 50.0 | 1 | 3 | 33.3 | 0.00 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0
row 14 : Total | 45.9 | 262 | 639 | 41.0 | 73.6 | 413 | 878 | 1291 | 587 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: Which player has a FG Pct less than 45.9, a def reb less than 43, and a total reb of 9?

Answer: Abromaitis
[Table] header: Player | FG Pct | 3FGM | 3FGA | 3FG Pct | FT Pct | Off Reb | Def Reb | Total Reb | Asst row 1 : Harangody | 51.5 | 3 | 8 | 37.5 | 76.7 | 103 | 212 | 315 | 53
row 2 : McAlarney | 43.6 | 103 | 230 | 44.8 | 82.3 | 7 | 56 | 62 | 110
row 3 : Kurz | 45.5 | 37 | 93 | 39.8 | 85.1 | 61 | 170 | 231 | 61
row 4 : Jackson | 39.1 | 17 | 59 | 28.8 | 51.0 | 54 | 102 | 156 | 189
row 5 : Ayers | 46.6 | 53 | 114 | 46.5 | 75.0 | 22 | 80 | 102 | 38
row 6 : Hillesland | 50.0 | 1 | 2 | 50.0 | 68.6 | 43 | 109 | 152 | 74
row 7 : Zeller | 43.2 | 31 | 80 | 38.8 | 53.8 | 27 | 43 | 70 | 14
row 8 : Peoples | 44.2 | 13 | 36 | 36.1 | 83.3 | 22 | 30 | 52 | 37
row 9 : Abromaitis | 26.3 | 1 | 8 | 12.5 | 100.0 | 4 | 5 | 9 | 3
row 10 : Proffitt | 42.9 | 2 | 5 | 40.0 | 0.00 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 2
row 11 : Andree | 100.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 100.0 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 1
row 12 : Nash | 46.2 | 0 | 1 | 0.00 | 27.3 | 8 | 12 | 20 | 5
row 13 : Kopko | 50.0 | 1 | 3 | 33.3 | 0.00 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0
row 14 : Total | 45.9 | 262 | 639 | 41.0 | 73.6 | 413 | 878 | 1291 | 587 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What is the lowest total reb of player Mcalarney, who has a 3FGM less than 103?

Answer: none
[Table] header: Player | FG Pct | 3FGM | 3FGA | 3FG Pct | FT Pct | Off Reb | Def Reb | Total Reb | Asst row 1 : Harangody | 51.5 | 3 | 8 | 37.5 | 76.7 | 103 | 212 | 315 | 53
row 2 : McAlarney | 43.6 | 103 | 230 | 44.8 | 82.3 | 7 | 56 | 62 | 110
row 3 : Kurz | 45.5 | 37 | 93 | 39.8 | 85.1 | 61 | 170 | 231 | 61
row 4 : Jackson | 39.1 | 17 | 59 | 28.8 | 51.0 | 54 | 102 | 156 | 189
row 5 : Ayers | 46.6 | 53 | 114 | 46.5 | 75.0 | 22 | 80 | 102 | 38
row 6 : Hillesland | 50.0 | 1 | 2 | 50.0 | 68.6 | 43 | 109 | 152 | 74
row 7 : Zeller | 43.2 | 31 | 80 | 38.8 | 53.8 | 27 | 43 | 70 | 14
row 8 : Peoples | 44.2 | 13 | 36 | 36.1 | 83.3 | 22 | 30 | 52 | 37
row 9 : Abromaitis | 26.3 | 1 | 8 | 12.5 | 100.0 | 4 | 5 | 9 | 3
row 10 : Proffitt | 42.9 | 2 | 5 | 40.0 | 0.00 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 2
row 11 : Andree | 100.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 100.0 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 1
row 12 : Nash | 46.2 | 0 | 1 | 0.00 | 27.3 | 8 | 12 | 20 | 5
row 13 : Kopko | 50.0 | 1 | 3 | 33.3 | 0.00 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0
row 14 : Total | 45.9 | 262 | 639 | 41.0 | 73.6 | 413 | 878 | 1291 | 587 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What is the highest FT pct of player abromaitis, who has a 3FG pct less than 12.5?

Answer: none
[Table] header: Player | FG Pct | 3FGM | 3FGA | 3FG Pct | FT Pct | Off Reb | Def Reb | Total Reb | Asst row 1 : Harangody | 51.5 | 3 | 8 | 37.5 | 76.7 | 103 | 212 | 315 | 53
row 2 : McAlarney | 43.6 | 103 | 230 | 44.8 | 82.3 | 7 | 56 | 62 | 110
row 3 : Kurz | 45.5 | 37 | 93 | 39.8 | 85.1 | 61 | 170 | 231 | 61
row 4 : Jackson | 39.1 | 17 | 59 | 28.8 | 51.0 | 54 | 102 | 156 | 189
row 5 : Ayers | 46.6 | 53 | 114 | 46.5 | 75.0 | 22 | 80 | 102 | 38
row 6 : Hillesland | 50.0 | 1 | 2 | 50.0 | 68.6 | 43 | 109 | 152 | 74
row 7 : Zeller | 43.2 | 31 | 80 | 38.8 | 53.8 | 27 | 43 | 70 | 14
row 8 : Peoples | 44.2 | 13 | 36 | 36.1 | 83.3 | 22 | 30 | 52 | 37
row 9 : Abromaitis | 26.3 | 1 | 8 | 12.5 | 100.0 | 4 | 5 | 9 | 3
row 10 : Proffitt | 42.9 | 2 | 5 | 40.0 | 0.00 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 2
row 11 : Andree | 100.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 100.0 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 1
row 12 : Nash | 46.2 | 0 | 1 | 0.00 | 27.3 | 8 | 12 | 20 | 5
row 13 : Kopko | 50.0 | 1 | 3 | 33.3 | 0.00 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0
row 14 : Total | 45.9 | 262 | 639 | 41.0 | 73.6 | 413 | 878 | 1291 | 587 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What is the lowest asst of the player with a def reb of 1 and a 3FG pct less than 33.3?

Answer: none
[Table] header: Rank | Name | Team | Games | Points row 1 : 1. | Lucas Victoriano | CAI Zaragoza | 34 | 196
row 2 : 2. | Jorge Jiménez | Aguas de Valencia | 33 | 154
row 3 : 3. | Diego Ciorciari | Melilla Baloncesto | 34 | 152
row 4 : 3. | Xavier Puyada | CB Alcúdia | 34 | 152
row 5 : 5. | Stéphane Dumas | Alicante Costa Blanca | 36 | 157 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: How many Games has a Name of stéphane dumas and a Rank larger than 5?

Answer: none
[Table] header: Rank | Name | Team | Games | Points row 1 : 1. | Lucas Victoriano | CAI Zaragoza | 34 | 196
row 2 : 2. | Jorge Jiménez | Aguas de Valencia | 33 | 154
row 3 : 3. | Diego Ciorciari | Melilla Baloncesto | 34 | 152
row 4 : 3. | Xavier Puyada | CB Alcúdia | 34 | 152
row 5 : 5. | Stéphane Dumas | Alicante Costa Blanca | 36 | 157 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: How many Games has a Team of cai zaragoza and a Rank smaller than 1?

Answer: none
[Table] header: Rank | Nation | Gold | Silver | Bronze | Total row 1 : 1 | Japan | 2 | 1 | 2 | 5
row 2 : 2 | Ukraine | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2
row 3 : 2 | United States | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2
row 4 : 4 | Canada | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3
row 5 : 5 | Austria | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0
row 6 : 6 | Russia | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2
row 7 : 7 | Poland | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1
row 8 : 8 | Germany | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1
row 9 : 8 | Sweden | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1
row 10 : Total | Total | 6 | 6 | 6 | 18 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What was the most total medals awarded to Poland?

Answer: 1.0
[Table] header: Week | Date | Opponent | Result | Attendance row 1 : 1 | September 12, 1964 | Houston Oilers | W 27–21 | 22,632
row 2 : 2 | September 20, 1964 | Boston Patriots | L 33–28 | 20,568
row 3 : 3 | September 26, 1964 | at Buffalo Bills | L 30–3 | 40,167
row 4 : 4 | October 3, 1964 | New York Jets | T 17–17 | 47,746
row 5 : 5 | October 9, 1964 | at Boston Patriots | W 26–17 | 35,095
row 6 : 6 | October 18, 1964 | Denver Broncos | W 42–14 | 23,332
row 7 : 7 | October 25, 1964 | at Houston Oilers | W 20–17 | 21,671
row 8 : 8 | November 1, 1964 | Oakland Raiders | W 31–17 | 25,557
row 9 : 9 | November 8, 1964 | at Denver Broncos | W 31–20 | 19,670
row 10 : 10 | November 15, 1964 | at Kansas City Chiefs | W 28–14 | 19,792
row 11 : 11 | November 26, 1964 | Buffalo Bills | L 27–24 | 31,860
row 12 : 12 | December 6, 1964 | New York Jets | W 38–3 | 25,753
row 13 : 13 | December 13, 1964 | Kansas City Chiefs | L 49–6 | 26,562
row 14 : 14 | December 20, 1964 | at Oakland Raiders | L 21–20 | 20,124 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What was the result of the game that was played in a week greater than 1 and greater than 19,792 people attended on October 18, 1964?

Answer: W 42–14
[Table] header: Week | Date | Opponent | Result | Attendance row 1 : 1 | September 12, 1964 | Houston Oilers | W 27–21 | 22,632
row 2 : 2 | September 20, 1964 | Boston Patriots | L 33–28 | 20,568
row 3 : 3 | September 26, 1964 | at Buffalo Bills | L 30–3 | 40,167
row 4 : 4 | October 3, 1964 | New York Jets | T 17–17 | 47,746
row 5 : 5 | October 9, 1964 | at Boston Patriots | W 26–17 | 35,095
row 6 : 6 | October 18, 1964 | Denver Broncos | W 42–14 | 23,332
row 7 : 7 | October 25, 1964 | at Houston Oilers | W 20–17 | 21,671
row 8 : 8 | November 1, 1964 | Oakland Raiders | W 31–17 | 25,557
row 9 : 9 | November 8, 1964 | at Denver Broncos | W 31–20 | 19,670
row 10 : 10 | November 15, 1964 | at Kansas City Chiefs | W 28–14 | 19,792
row 11 : 11 | November 26, 1964 | Buffalo Bills | L 27–24 | 31,860
row 12 : 12 | December 6, 1964 | New York Jets | W 38–3 | 25,753
row 13 : 13 | December 13, 1964 | Kansas City Chiefs | L 49–6 | 26,562
row 14 : 14 | December 20, 1964 | at Oakland Raiders | L 21–20 | 20,124 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: When the opponent was the Denver Broncos and the attendance more than 21,671 and the week less than 8 what was the result of the game?

Answer: W 42–14
[Table] header: Week | Date | Opponent | Result | Attendance row 1 : 1 | September 12, 1964 | Houston Oilers | W 27–21 | 22,632
row 2 : 2 | September 20, 1964 | Boston Patriots | L 33–28 | 20,568
row 3 : 3 | September 26, 1964 | at Buffalo Bills | L 30–3 | 40,167
row 4 : 4 | October 3, 1964 | New York Jets | T 17–17 | 47,746
row 5 : 5 | October 9, 1964 | at Boston Patriots | W 26–17 | 35,095
row 6 : 6 | October 18, 1964 | Denver Broncos | W 42–14 | 23,332
row 7 : 7 | October 25, 1964 | at Houston Oilers | W 20–17 | 21,671
row 8 : 8 | November 1, 1964 | Oakland Raiders | W 31–17 | 25,557
row 9 : 9 | November 8, 1964 | at Denver Broncos | W 31–20 | 19,670
row 10 : 10 | November 15, 1964 | at Kansas City Chiefs | W 28–14 | 19,792
row 11 : 11 | November 26, 1964 | Buffalo Bills | L 27–24 | 31,860
row 12 : 12 | December 6, 1964 | New York Jets | W 38–3 | 25,753
row 13 : 13 | December 13, 1964 | Kansas City Chiefs | L 49–6 | 26,562
row 14 : 14 | December 20, 1964 | at Oakland Raiders | L 21–20 | 20,124 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: How many people attended the game on December 20, 1964?

Answer: 20124.0
[Table] header: Week | Date | Opponent | Result | Attendance row 1 : 1 | August 31, 1997 | Atlanta Falcons | W 28-17 | 61,244
row 2 : 2 | September 7, 1997 | Tampa Bay Buccaneers | L 24-17 | 58,234
row 3 : 3 | September 14, 1997 | at Chicago Bears | W 32-7 | 59,147
row 4 : 4 | September 21, 1997 | at New Orleans Saints | L 35-17 | 50,116
row 5 : 5 | September 28, 1997 | Green Bay Packers | W 26-15 | 78,110
row 6 : 6 | October 5, 1997 | at Buffalo Bills | L 22-13 | 78,025
row 7 : 7 | October 12, 1997 | at Tampa Bay Buccaneers | W 27-9 | 72,095
row 8 : 8 | October 19, 1997 | New York Giants | L 26-20 OT | 70,069
row 9 : 9 | Bye | Bye | Bye | Bye
row 10 : 10 | November 2, 1997 | at Green Bay Packers | L 20-10 | 60,126
row 11 : 11 | November 9, 1997 | at Washington Redskins | L 30-7 | 75,261
row 12 : 12 | November 16, 1997 | Minnesota Vikings | W 38-15 | 68,910
row 13 : 13 | November 23, 1997 | Indianapolis Colts | W 32-10 | 62,803
row 14 : 14 | November 27, 1997 | Chicago Bears | W 55-20 | 77,904
row 15 : 15 | December 7, 1997 | at Miami Dolphins | L 33-30 | 72,266
row 16 : 16 | December 14, 1997 | at Minnesota Vikings | W 14-13 | 60,982
row 17 : 17 | December 21, 1997 | New York Jets | W 13-10 | 77,624 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: On what date did the Lions play against the Tampa Bay Buccaneers?

Answer: September 7, 1997
[Table] header: Week | Date | Opponent | Result | Attendance row 1 : 1 | August 31, 1997 | Atlanta Falcons | W 28-17 | 61,244
row 2 : 2 | September 7, 1997 | Tampa Bay Buccaneers | L 24-17 | 58,234
row 3 : 3 | September 14, 1997 | at Chicago Bears | W 32-7 | 59,147
row 4 : 4 | September 21, 1997 | at New Orleans Saints | L 35-17 | 50,116
row 5 : 5 | September 28, 1997 | Green Bay Packers | W 26-15 | 78,110
row 6 : 6 | October 5, 1997 | at Buffalo Bills | L 22-13 | 78,025
row 7 : 7 | October 12, 1997 | at Tampa Bay Buccaneers | W 27-9 | 72,095
row 8 : 8 | October 19, 1997 | New York Giants | L 26-20 OT | 70,069
row 9 : 9 | Bye | Bye | Bye | Bye
row 10 : 10 | November 2, 1997 | at Green Bay Packers | L 20-10 | 60,126
row 11 : 11 | November 9, 1997 | at Washington Redskins | L 30-7 | 75,261
row 12 : 12 | November 16, 1997 | Minnesota Vikings | W 38-15 | 68,910
row 13 : 13 | November 23, 1997 | Indianapolis Colts | W 32-10 | 62,803
row 14 : 14 | November 27, 1997 | Chicago Bears | W 55-20 | 77,904
row 15 : 15 | December 7, 1997 | at Miami Dolphins | L 33-30 | 72,266
row 16 : 16 | December 14, 1997 | at Minnesota Vikings | W 14-13 | 60,982
row 17 : 17 | December 21, 1997 | New York Jets | W 13-10 | 77,624 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What was the date of the game against the New York Jets?

Answer: December 21, 1997
[Table] header: Week | Date | Opponent | Result | Attendance row 1 : 1 | September 11, 1965 | Denver Broncos | W 34–31 | 27,022
row 2 : 2 | September 19, 1965 | at Oakland Raiders | W 17–6 | 21,406
row 3 : 3 | September 26, 1965 | Kansas City Chiefs | T 10–10 | 28,126
row 4 : 4 | October 3, 1965 | Houston Oilers | W 31–14 | 28,190
row 5 : 5 | October 10, 1965 | at Buffalo Bills | W 34–3 | 45,260
row 6 : 6 | October 17, 1965 | at Boston Patriots | T 13–13 | 20,924
row 7 : 7 | October 23, 1965 | at New York Jets | W 34–9 | 60,679
row 8 : 8 | October 31, 1965 | Boston Patriots | L 22–6 | 33,366
row 9 : 9 | November 7, 1965 | at Denver Broncos | W 35–21 | 33,073
row 10 : 10 | November 14, 1965 | at Kansas City Chiefs | L 31–7 | 21,968
row 11 : 11 | November 25, 1965 | Buffalo Bills | T 20–20 | 27,473
row 12 : 12 | December 4, 1965 | New York Jets | W 38–7 | 32,169
row 13 : 13 | December 12, 1965 | at Houston Oilers | W 37–26 | 24,120
row 14 : 14 | December 19, 1965 | Oakland Raiders | W 24–14 | 26,056 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What is the Attendance with a Date that is october 31, 1965?

Answer: 33366.0
[Table] header: Week | Date | Opponent | Result | Attendance row 1 : 1 | September 11, 1965 | Denver Broncos | W 34–31 | 27,022
row 2 : 2 | September 19, 1965 | at Oakland Raiders | W 17–6 | 21,406
row 3 : 3 | September 26, 1965 | Kansas City Chiefs | T 10–10 | 28,126
row 4 : 4 | October 3, 1965 | Houston Oilers | W 31–14 | 28,190
row 5 : 5 | October 10, 1965 | at Buffalo Bills | W 34–3 | 45,260
row 6 : 6 | October 17, 1965 | at Boston Patriots | T 13–13 | 20,924
row 7 : 7 | October 23, 1965 | at New York Jets | W 34–9 | 60,679
row 8 : 8 | October 31, 1965 | Boston Patriots | L 22–6 | 33,366
row 9 : 9 | November 7, 1965 | at Denver Broncos | W 35–21 | 33,073
row 10 : 10 | November 14, 1965 | at Kansas City Chiefs | L 31–7 | 21,968
row 11 : 11 | November 25, 1965 | Buffalo Bills | T 20–20 | 27,473
row 12 : 12 | December 4, 1965 | New York Jets | W 38–7 | 32,169
row 13 : 13 | December 12, 1965 | at Houston Oilers | W 37–26 | 24,120
row 14 : 14 | December 19, 1965 | Oakland Raiders | W 24–14 | 26,056 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What is the Attendance with a Date that is november 25, 1965?

Answer: 27473.0
[Table] header: geohash length | lat bits | lng bits | lat error | lng error | km error row 1 : 1 | 2 | 3 | ±23 | ±23 | ±2500
row 2 : 2 | 5 | 5 | ± 2.8 | ± 5.6 | ±630
row 3 : 3 | 7 | 8 | ± 0.70 | ± 0.7 | ±78
row 4 : 4 | 10 | 10 | ± 0.087 | ± 0.18 | ±20
row 5 : 5 | 12 | 13 | ± 0.022 | ± 0.022 | ±2.4
row 6 : 6 | 15 | 15 | ± 0.0027 | ± 0.0055 | ±0.61
row 7 : 7 | 17 | 18 | ±0.00068 | ±0.00068 | ±0.076
row 8 : 8 | 20 | 20 | ±0.000085 | ±0.00017 | ±0.019 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What is the lowest geohash length when the lat bits are less than 7, and the km error of ±2500?

Answer: 1.0
[Table] header: geohash length | lat bits | lng bits | lat error | lng error | km error row 1 : 1 | 2 | 3 | ±23 | ±23 | ±2500
row 2 : 2 | 5 | 5 | ± 2.8 | ± 5.6 | ±630
row 3 : 3 | 7 | 8 | ± 0.70 | ± 0.7 | ±78
row 4 : 4 | 10 | 10 | ± 0.087 | ± 0.18 | ±20
row 5 : 5 | 12 | 13 | ± 0.022 | ± 0.022 | ±2.4
row 6 : 6 | 15 | 15 | ± 0.0027 | ± 0.0055 | ±0.61
row 7 : 7 | 17 | 18 | ±0.00068 | ±0.00068 | ±0.076
row 8 : 8 | 20 | 20 | ±0.000085 | ±0.00017 | ±0.019 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What is the highest geohash length when the lat error is ±0.00068, and the lat bits larger than 17?

Answer: none
[Table] header: geohash length | lat bits | lng bits | lat error | lng error | km error row 1 : 1 | 2 | 3 | ±23 | ±23 | ±2500
row 2 : 2 | 5 | 5 | ± 2.8 | ± 5.6 | ±630
row 3 : 3 | 7 | 8 | ± 0.70 | ± 0.7 | ±78
row 4 : 4 | 10 | 10 | ± 0.087 | ± 0.18 | ±20
row 5 : 5 | 12 | 13 | ± 0.022 | ± 0.022 | ±2.4
row 6 : 6 | 15 | 15 | ± 0.0027 | ± 0.0055 | ±0.61
row 7 : 7 | 17 | 18 | ±0.00068 | ±0.00068 | ±0.076
row 8 : 8 | 20 | 20 | ±0.000085 | ±0.00017 | ±0.019 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What is the highest geohash length when there is a ng error of ±0.00017, and a lng bits smaller than 20?

Answer: none
[Table] header: Position | Team | Points | Played | Drawn | Lost | Against | Difference row 1 : 1 | São Paulo | 33 | 20 | 3 | 2 | 22 | 41
row 2 : 2 | Corinthians | 32 | 20 | 2 | 3 | 28 | 43
row 3 : 3 | Palmeiras | 31 | 20 | 3 | 3 | 20 | 33
row 4 : 4 | Juventus | 23 | 20 | 5 | 6 | 31 | 18
row 5 : 5 | Ypiranga-SP | 23 | 20 | 1 | 8 | 40 | 1
row 6 : 6 | Santos | 21 | 20 | 1 | 9 | 39 | 6
row 7 : 7 | Portuguesa | 21 | 20 | 3 | 8 | 34 | 5
row 8 : 8 | Comercial-SP | 12 | 20 | 2 | 13 | 53 | - 16
row 9 : 9 | Portuguesa Santista | 10 | 20 | 2 | 14 | 81 | - 49
row 10 : 10 | São Paulo Railway | 9 | 20 | 1 | 15 | 77 | - 39
row 11 : 11 | Jabaquara | 5 | 20 | 1 | 17 | 73 | - 43 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: Which Against has a Drawn smaller than 5, a Lost of 3, and a Position of 3?

Answer: 20.0
[Table] header: Position | Team | Points | Played | Drawn | Lost | Against | Difference row 1 : 1 | São Paulo | 33 | 20 | 3 | 2 | 22 | 41
row 2 : 2 | Corinthians | 32 | 20 | 2 | 3 | 28 | 43
row 3 : 3 | Palmeiras | 31 | 20 | 3 | 3 | 20 | 33
row 4 : 4 | Juventus | 23 | 20 | 5 | 6 | 31 | 18
row 5 : 5 | Ypiranga-SP | 23 | 20 | 1 | 8 | 40 | 1
row 6 : 6 | Santos | 21 | 20 | 1 | 9 | 39 | 6
row 7 : 7 | Portuguesa | 21 | 20 | 3 | 8 | 34 | 5
row 8 : 8 | Comercial-SP | 12 | 20 | 2 | 13 | 53 | - 16
row 9 : 9 | Portuguesa Santista | 10 | 20 | 2 | 14 | 81 | - 49
row 10 : 10 | São Paulo Railway | 9 | 20 | 1 | 15 | 77 | - 39
row 11 : 11 | Jabaquara | 5 | 20 | 1 | 17 | 73 | - 43 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: Which Against has a Position larger than 8, and Points larger than 9?

Answer: 81.0
[Table] header: Position | Team | Points | Played | Drawn | Lost | Against | Difference row 1 : 1 | São Paulo | 33 | 20 | 3 | 2 | 22 | 41
row 2 : 2 | Corinthians | 32 | 20 | 2 | 3 | 28 | 43
row 3 : 3 | Palmeiras | 31 | 20 | 3 | 3 | 20 | 33
row 4 : 4 | Juventus | 23 | 20 | 5 | 6 | 31 | 18
row 5 : 5 | Ypiranga-SP | 23 | 20 | 1 | 8 | 40 | 1
row 6 : 6 | Santos | 21 | 20 | 1 | 9 | 39 | 6
row 7 : 7 | Portuguesa | 21 | 20 | 3 | 8 | 34 | 5
row 8 : 8 | Comercial-SP | 12 | 20 | 2 | 13 | 53 | - 16
row 9 : 9 | Portuguesa Santista | 10 | 20 | 2 | 14 | 81 | - 49
row 10 : 10 | São Paulo Railway | 9 | 20 | 1 | 15 | 77 | - 39
row 11 : 11 | Jabaquara | 5 | 20 | 1 | 17 | 73 | - 43 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: Which Lost has Points smaller than 12, and a Drawn larger than 1?

Answer: 1.0
[Table] header: Position | Team | Points | Played | Drawn | Lost | Against | Difference row 1 : 1 | São Paulo | 33 | 20 | 3 | 2 | 22 | 41
row 2 : 2 | Corinthians | 32 | 20 | 2 | 3 | 28 | 43
row 3 : 3 | Palmeiras | 31 | 20 | 3 | 3 | 20 | 33
row 4 : 4 | Juventus | 23 | 20 | 5 | 6 | 31 | 18
row 5 : 5 | Ypiranga-SP | 23 | 20 | 1 | 8 | 40 | 1
row 6 : 6 | Santos | 21 | 20 | 1 | 9 | 39 | 6
row 7 : 7 | Portuguesa | 21 | 20 | 3 | 8 | 34 | 5
row 8 : 8 | Comercial-SP | 12 | 20 | 2 | 13 | 53 | - 16
row 9 : 9 | Portuguesa Santista | 10 | 20 | 2 | 14 | 81 | - 49
row 10 : 10 | São Paulo Railway | 9 | 20 | 1 | 15 | 77 | - 39
row 11 : 11 | Jabaquara | 5 | 20 | 1 | 17 | 73 | - 43 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: Which Position has a Difference of 5, and a Drawn smaller than 3?

Answer: none
[Table] header: Position | Team | Points | Played | Drawn | Lost | Against | Difference row 1 : 1 | São Paulo | 33 | 20 | 3 | 2 | 22 | 41
row 2 : 2 | Corinthians | 32 | 20 | 2 | 3 | 28 | 43
row 3 : 3 | Palmeiras | 31 | 20 | 3 | 3 | 20 | 33
row 4 : 4 | Juventus | 23 | 20 | 5 | 6 | 31 | 18
row 5 : 5 | Ypiranga-SP | 23 | 20 | 1 | 8 | 40 | 1
row 6 : 6 | Santos | 21 | 20 | 1 | 9 | 39 | 6
row 7 : 7 | Portuguesa | 21 | 20 | 3 | 8 | 34 | 5
row 8 : 8 | Comercial-SP | 12 | 20 | 2 | 13 | 53 | - 16
row 9 : 9 | Portuguesa Santista | 10 | 20 | 2 | 14 | 81 | - 49
row 10 : 10 | São Paulo Railway | 9 | 20 | 1 | 15 | 77 | - 39
row 11 : 11 | Jabaquara | 5 | 20 | 1 | 17 | 73 | - 43 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: Which Against has a Position larger than 11?

Answer: 0.0
[Table] header: Player | Nationality | Position | Years in Orlando | School/Club Team row 1 : Geert Hammink | Netherlands | Center | 1993–1995 | Louisiana State
row 2 : Penny Hardaway | United States | Guard | 1993–1999 | Memphis
row 3 : Derek Harper | United States | Guard | 1997–1998 | Illinois
row 4 : Justin Harper | United States | Forward-Center | 2011-2012 | Richmond
row 5 : Matt Harpring | United States | Forward | 1998–2000 | Georgia Tech
row 6 : Al Harrington | United States | Forward | 2012–present | St. Patrick High School Academy
row 7 : Donnell Harvey | United States | Forward | 2003 | Florida
row 8 : Sean Higgins | United States | Guard-Forward | 1991–1992 | Michigan
row 9 : Grant Hill | United States | Forward | 2000–2007 | Duke
row 10 : Dwight Howard | United States | Forward-Center | 2004–2012 | Southwest Atlanta Christian Academy
row 11 : Juwan Howard | United States | Forward-Center | 2003–2004 | Michigan
row 12 : Troy Hudson | United States | Guard | 2000–2002 | Southern Illinois
row 13 : Ryan Humphrey | United States | Forward | 2002–2003 | Notre Dame
row 14 : Brandon Hunter | United States | Forward | 2004–2005 | Ohio
row 15 : Steven Hunter | United States | Center | 2001–2004 | DePaul [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: Which Player has a Nationality of united states, a Position of forward, and a School/Club Team of notre dame?

Answer: Ryan Humphrey
[Table] header: Player | Nationality | Position | Years in Orlando | School/Club Team row 1 : Geert Hammink | Netherlands | Center | 1993–1995 | Louisiana State
row 2 : Penny Hardaway | United States | Guard | 1993–1999 | Memphis
row 3 : Derek Harper | United States | Guard | 1997–1998 | Illinois
row 4 : Justin Harper | United States | Forward-Center | 2011-2012 | Richmond
row 5 : Matt Harpring | United States | Forward | 1998–2000 | Georgia Tech
row 6 : Al Harrington | United States | Forward | 2012–present | St. Patrick High School Academy
row 7 : Donnell Harvey | United States | Forward | 2003 | Florida
row 8 : Sean Higgins | United States | Guard-Forward | 1991–1992 | Michigan
row 9 : Grant Hill | United States | Forward | 2000–2007 | Duke
row 10 : Dwight Howard | United States | Forward-Center | 2004–2012 | Southwest Atlanta Christian Academy
row 11 : Juwan Howard | United States | Forward-Center | 2003–2004 | Michigan
row 12 : Troy Hudson | United States | Guard | 2000–2002 | Southern Illinois
row 13 : Ryan Humphrey | United States | Forward | 2002–2003 | Notre Dame
row 14 : Brandon Hunter | United States | Forward | 2004–2005 | Ohio
row 15 : Steven Hunter | United States | Center | 2001–2004 | DePaul [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: Which Nationality has a School/Club Team of louisiana state?

Answer: Netherlands
[Table] header: Player | Nationality | Position | Years in Orlando | School/Club Team row 1 : Geert Hammink | Netherlands | Center | 1993–1995 | Louisiana State
row 2 : Penny Hardaway | United States | Guard | 1993–1999 | Memphis
row 3 : Derek Harper | United States | Guard | 1997–1998 | Illinois
row 4 : Justin Harper | United States | Forward-Center | 2011-2012 | Richmond
row 5 : Matt Harpring | United States | Forward | 1998–2000 | Georgia Tech
row 6 : Al Harrington | United States | Forward | 2012–present | St. Patrick High School Academy
row 7 : Donnell Harvey | United States | Forward | 2003 | Florida
row 8 : Sean Higgins | United States | Guard-Forward | 1991–1992 | Michigan
row 9 : Grant Hill | United States | Forward | 2000–2007 | Duke
row 10 : Dwight Howard | United States | Forward-Center | 2004–2012 | Southwest Atlanta Christian Academy
row 11 : Juwan Howard | United States | Forward-Center | 2003–2004 | Michigan
row 12 : Troy Hudson | United States | Guard | 2000–2002 | Southern Illinois
row 13 : Ryan Humphrey | United States | Forward | 2002–2003 | Notre Dame
row 14 : Brandon Hunter | United States | Forward | 2004–2005 | Ohio
row 15 : Steven Hunter | United States | Center | 2001–2004 | DePaul [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: Which Years in Orlando has a Position of center, and a School/Club Team of louisiana state?

Answer: 1993–1995
[Table] header: Player | Nationality | Position | Years in Orlando | School/Club Team row 1 : Geert Hammink | Netherlands | Center | 1993–1995 | Louisiana State
row 2 : Penny Hardaway | United States | Guard | 1993–1999 | Memphis
row 3 : Derek Harper | United States | Guard | 1997–1998 | Illinois
row 4 : Justin Harper | United States | Forward-Center | 2011-2012 | Richmond
row 5 : Matt Harpring | United States | Forward | 1998–2000 | Georgia Tech
row 6 : Al Harrington | United States | Forward | 2012–present | St. Patrick High School Academy
row 7 : Donnell Harvey | United States | Forward | 2003 | Florida
row 8 : Sean Higgins | United States | Guard-Forward | 1991–1992 | Michigan
row 9 : Grant Hill | United States | Forward | 2000–2007 | Duke
row 10 : Dwight Howard | United States | Forward-Center | 2004–2012 | Southwest Atlanta Christian Academy
row 11 : Juwan Howard | United States | Forward-Center | 2003–2004 | Michigan
row 12 : Troy Hudson | United States | Guard | 2000–2002 | Southern Illinois
row 13 : Ryan Humphrey | United States | Forward | 2002–2003 | Notre Dame
row 14 : Brandon Hunter | United States | Forward | 2004–2005 | Ohio
row 15 : Steven Hunter | United States | Center | 2001–2004 | DePaul [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: Which Position has a School/Club Team of illinois?

Answer: Guard