sail/symbolic-instruction-tuning huggingface dataset:
[Table] header: Goal | Date | Venue | Score | Result | Competition row 1 : 1. | 12 August 1998 | Asim Ferhatović Hase Stadium  | 1–0 | 1–0 | UEFA Euro 2000 qualifying
row 2 : 2. | 14 October 1998 | Žalgiris Stadium , Vilnius | 2–2 | 2–4 | UEFA Euro 2000 qualifying
row 3 : 3. | 9 October 1999 | Kadriorg Stadium , Tallin | 1–1 | 4–1 | UEFA Euro 2000 qualifying
row 4 : 4. | 9 October 1999 | Kadriorg Stadium, Tallinn | 2–1 | 4–1 | UEFA Euro 2000 qualifying
row 5 : 5. | 9 October 1999 | Kadriorg Stadium, Tallinn | 3–1 | 4–1 | UEFA Euro 2000 qualifying
row 6 : 6. | 9 October 1999 | Kadriorg Stadium, Tallinn | 4–1 | 4–1 | UEFA Euro 2000 qualifying
row 7 : 7. | 2 September 2000 | Asim Ferhatović Hase Stadium, | 1-1 | 1–2 | 2002 FIFA World Cup qualification
row 8 : 8. | 15 August 2001 | Asim Ferhatović Hase Stadium, | 1–0 | 2–0 | Friendly match
row 9 : 9. | 15 August 2001 | Asim Ferhatović Hase Stadium, | 2–0 | 2–0 | Friendly match
row 10 : 10. | 7 October 2001 | Asim Ferhatović Hase Stadium, | 2–0 | 5–0 | 2002 FIFA World Cup qualification
row 11 : 11. | 7 October 2001 | Asim Ferhatović Hase Stadium, | 4–0 | 5–0 | 2002 FIFA World Cup qualification
row 12 : 12. | 11 October 2002 | Asim Ferhatović Hase Stadium, | 1–0 | 1–1 | Friendly match
row 13 : 13. | 13 February 2003 | Millennium Stadium , Cardiff | 1–0 | 2–2 | Friendly match
row 14 : 14. | 2 April 2003 | Parken Stadium , Copenhagen | 2–0 | 2–0 | UEFA Euro 2004 qualifying [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What was the final score in a 2002 fifa world cup qualification that was less than 10?

Answer: 1–2
[Table] header: Year | Entrant | Chassis | Engine | Pts. row 1 : 1978 | Olympus Cameras / Heske | Hesketh 308E | Ford V8 | 1
row 2 : 1978 | Team Tissot Ensign | Ensign N177 | Ford V8 | 1
row 3 : 1979 | Team Ensign | Ensign N177 | Ford V8 | 0
row 4 : 1979 | Team Ensign | Ensign N179 | Ford V8 | 0
row 5 : 1979 | Candy Tyrrell Team | Tyrrell 009 | Ford V8 | 0
row 6 : 1980 | Candy Tyrrell Team | Tyrrell 009 | Ford V8 | 6
row 7 : 1980 | Candy Tyrrell Team | Tyrrell 010 | Ford V8 | 6
row 8 : 1981 | March Grand Prix Team | March 811 | Ford V8 | 0
row 9 : 1982 | Theodore Racing Team | Theodore TY01 | Ford V8 | 8
row 10 : 1982 | Theodore Racing Team | Theodore TY02 | Ford V8 | 8
row 11 : 1982 | TAG Williams Team | Williams FW08 | Ford V8 | 8 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What is the earliest year with points more than 8?

Answer: none
[Table] header: Year | Entrant | Chassis | Engine | Pts. row 1 : 1978 | Olympus Cameras / Heske | Hesketh 308E | Ford V8 | 1
row 2 : 1978 | Team Tissot Ensign | Ensign N177 | Ford V8 | 1
row 3 : 1979 | Team Ensign | Ensign N177 | Ford V8 | 0
row 4 : 1979 | Team Ensign | Ensign N179 | Ford V8 | 0
row 5 : 1979 | Candy Tyrrell Team | Tyrrell 009 | Ford V8 | 0
row 6 : 1980 | Candy Tyrrell Team | Tyrrell 009 | Ford V8 | 6
row 7 : 1980 | Candy Tyrrell Team | Tyrrell 010 | Ford V8 | 6
row 8 : 1981 | March Grand Prix Team | March 811 | Ford V8 | 0
row 9 : 1982 | Theodore Racing Team | Theodore TY01 | Ford V8 | 8
row 10 : 1982 | Theodore Racing Team | Theodore TY02 | Ford V8 | 8
row 11 : 1982 | TAG Williams Team | Williams FW08 | Ford V8 | 8 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What are the points for a chassis of march 811?

Answer: 0.0
[Table] header: Year | Entrant | Chassis | Engine | Pts. row 1 : 1978 | Olympus Cameras / Heske | Hesketh 308E | Ford V8 | 1
row 2 : 1978 | Team Tissot Ensign | Ensign N177 | Ford V8 | 1
row 3 : 1979 | Team Ensign | Ensign N177 | Ford V8 | 0
row 4 : 1979 | Team Ensign | Ensign N179 | Ford V8 | 0
row 5 : 1979 | Candy Tyrrell Team | Tyrrell 009 | Ford V8 | 0
row 6 : 1980 | Candy Tyrrell Team | Tyrrell 009 | Ford V8 | 6
row 7 : 1980 | Candy Tyrrell Team | Tyrrell 010 | Ford V8 | 6
row 8 : 1981 | March Grand Prix Team | March 811 | Ford V8 | 0
row 9 : 1982 | Theodore Racing Team | Theodore TY01 | Ford V8 | 8
row 10 : 1982 | Theodore Racing Team | Theodore TY02 | Ford V8 | 8
row 11 : 1982 | TAG Williams Team | Williams FW08 | Ford V8 | 8 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: Who had 8 points, later than 1980, and a theodore ty02 chassis?

Answer: Theodore Racing Team
[Table] header: Player | Country | Year(s) won | Total | To par row 1 : Corey Pavin | United States | 1995 | 151 | +11
row 2 : Tiger Woods | United States | 2000 , 2002 | 152 | +12
row 3 : Michael Campbell | New Zealand | 2005 | 152 | +12
row 4 : Lee Janzen | United States | 1993 , 1998 | 154 | +14
row 5 : Retief Goosen | South Africa | 2001 , 2004 | 155 | +15 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: Which United States player has a To par of 14?

Answer: Lee Janzen
[Table] header: Year | Entrant | Chassis | Engine | Points row 1 : 1978 | Elf Team Tyrrell | Tyrrell 008 | Cosworth V8 | 7
row 2 : 1979 | Team Tyrrell | Tyrrell 009 | Cosworth V8 | 14
row 3 : 1979 | Candy Tyrrell Team | Tyrrell 009 | Cosworth V8 | 14
row 4 : 1980 | Equipe Ligier Gitanes | Ligier JS11/15 | Cosworth V8 | 32
row 5 : 1981 | Scuderia Ferrari | Ferrari 126CK | Ferrari V6 T | 9
row 6 : 1982 | Scuderia Ferrari | Ferrari 126C2 | Ferrari V6 T | 39 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: Which year averaged less than 9 points?

Answer: 1978.0
[Table] header: Year | Entrant | Chassis | Engine | Points row 1 : 1978 | Elf Team Tyrrell | Tyrrell 008 | Cosworth V8 | 7
row 2 : 1979 | Team Tyrrell | Tyrrell 009 | Cosworth V8 | 14
row 3 : 1979 | Candy Tyrrell Team | Tyrrell 009 | Cosworth V8 | 14
row 4 : 1980 | Equipe Ligier Gitanes | Ligier JS11/15 | Cosworth V8 | 32
row 5 : 1981 | Scuderia Ferrari | Ferrari 126CK | Ferrari V6 T | 9
row 6 : 1982 | Scuderia Ferrari | Ferrari 126C2 | Ferrari V6 T | 39 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What is the total points of teams using a ligier js11/15 chassis?

Answer: 1.0
[Table] header: Year | Entrant | Chassis | Engine | Points row 1 : 1978 | Elf Team Tyrrell | Tyrrell 008 | Cosworth V8 | 7
row 2 : 1979 | Team Tyrrell | Tyrrell 009 | Cosworth V8 | 14
row 3 : 1979 | Candy Tyrrell Team | Tyrrell 009 | Cosworth V8 | 14
row 4 : 1980 | Equipe Ligier Gitanes | Ligier JS11/15 | Cosworth V8 | 32
row 5 : 1981 | Scuderia Ferrari | Ferrari 126CK | Ferrari V6 T | 9
row 6 : 1982 | Scuderia Ferrari | Ferrari 126C2 | Ferrari V6 T | 39 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What is the highest year team tyrrell earned more than 14 points?

Answer: none
[Table] header: Club | Played | Drawn | Lost | Points for | Points against | Tries for | Tries against | Try bonus | Losing bonus row 1 : Club | Played | Drawn | Lost | Points for | Points against | Tries for | Tries against | Try bonus | Losing bonus
row 2 : Mountain Ash RFC | 22 | 0 | 0 | 791 | 280 | 103 | 32 | 15 | 0
row 3 : Tredegar RFC | 22 | 0 | 3 | 786 | 361 | 107 | 39 | 17 | 2
row 4 : Llantrisant RFC | 22 | 0 | 9 | 617 | 520 | 79 | 71 | 11 | 2
row 5 : Rhydyfelin RFC | 22 | 1 | 8 | 593 | 489 | 87 | 61 | 8 | 2
row 6 : Penallta RFC | 22 | 0 | 11 | 433 | 407 | 56 | 49 | 7 | 4
row 7 : Tylorstown RFC | 22 | 1 | 11 | 501 | 517 | 66 | 63 | 7 | 5
row 8 : Fleur De Lys RFC | 22 | 1 | 12 | 535 | 575 | 65 | 70 | 10 | 5
row 9 : Llantwit Fardre RFC | 22 | 1 | 11 | 464 | 504 | 60 | 64 | 3 | 2
row 10 : Ynysybwl R | 22 | 1 | 12 | 470 | 564 | 56 | 70 | 4 | 4
row 11 : Brynmawr RFC | 22 | 1 | 13 | 474 | 560 | 61 | 71 | 7 | 5
row 12 : Penarth RFC | 22 | 0 | 17 | 335 | 556 | 37 | 74 | 2 | 4
row 13 : Caerphilly RFC | 22 | 0 | 22 | 295 | 961 | 32 | 145 | 2 | 2
row 14 : Correct as of 26 May 2012 | Correct as of 26 May 2012 | Correct as of 26 May 2012 | Correct as of 26 May 2012 | Correct as of 26 May 2012 | Correct as of 26 May 2012 | Correct as of 26 May 2012 | Correct as of 26 May 2012 | Correct as of 26 May 2012 | Correct as of 26 May 2012 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: Which club had 1, draw, 11 lost, and a try bonus of 7?

Answer: Tylorstown RFC
[Table] header: Club | Played | Drawn | Lost | Points for | Points against | Tries for | Tries against | Try bonus | Losing bonus row 1 : Club | Played | Drawn | Lost | Points for | Points against | Tries for | Tries against | Try bonus | Losing bonus
row 2 : Mountain Ash RFC | 22 | 0 | 0 | 791 | 280 | 103 | 32 | 15 | 0
row 3 : Tredegar RFC | 22 | 0 | 3 | 786 | 361 | 107 | 39 | 17 | 2
row 4 : Llantrisant RFC | 22 | 0 | 9 | 617 | 520 | 79 | 71 | 11 | 2
row 5 : Rhydyfelin RFC | 22 | 1 | 8 | 593 | 489 | 87 | 61 | 8 | 2
row 6 : Penallta RFC | 22 | 0 | 11 | 433 | 407 | 56 | 49 | 7 | 4
row 7 : Tylorstown RFC | 22 | 1 | 11 | 501 | 517 | 66 | 63 | 7 | 5
row 8 : Fleur De Lys RFC | 22 | 1 | 12 | 535 | 575 | 65 | 70 | 10 | 5
row 9 : Llantwit Fardre RFC | 22 | 1 | 11 | 464 | 504 | 60 | 64 | 3 | 2
row 10 : Ynysybwl R | 22 | 1 | 12 | 470 | 564 | 56 | 70 | 4 | 4
row 11 : Brynmawr RFC | 22 | 1 | 13 | 474 | 560 | 61 | 71 | 7 | 5
row 12 : Penarth RFC | 22 | 0 | 17 | 335 | 556 | 37 | 74 | 2 | 4
row 13 : Caerphilly RFC | 22 | 0 | 22 | 295 | 961 | 32 | 145 | 2 | 2
row 14 : Correct as of 26 May 2012 | Correct as of 26 May 2012 | Correct as of 26 May 2012 | Correct as of 26 May 2012 | Correct as of 26 May 2012 | Correct as of 26 May 2012 | Correct as of 26 May 2012 | Correct as of 26 May 2012 | Correct as of 26 May 2012 | Correct as of 26 May 2012 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: How many tries against were there when there was 961 points against?

Answer: 145.0
[Table] header: Club | Played | Drawn | Lost | Points for | Points against | Tries for | Tries against | Try bonus | Losing bonus row 1 : Club | Played | Drawn | Lost | Points for | Points against | Tries for | Tries against | Try bonus | Losing bonus
row 2 : Mountain Ash RFC | 22 | 0 | 0 | 791 | 280 | 103 | 32 | 15 | 0
row 3 : Tredegar RFC | 22 | 0 | 3 | 786 | 361 | 107 | 39 | 17 | 2
row 4 : Llantrisant RFC | 22 | 0 | 9 | 617 | 520 | 79 | 71 | 11 | 2
row 5 : Rhydyfelin RFC | 22 | 1 | 8 | 593 | 489 | 87 | 61 | 8 | 2
row 6 : Penallta RFC | 22 | 0 | 11 | 433 | 407 | 56 | 49 | 7 | 4
row 7 : Tylorstown RFC | 22 | 1 | 11 | 501 | 517 | 66 | 63 | 7 | 5
row 8 : Fleur De Lys RFC | 22 | 1 | 12 | 535 | 575 | 65 | 70 | 10 | 5
row 9 : Llantwit Fardre RFC | 22 | 1 | 11 | 464 | 504 | 60 | 64 | 3 | 2
row 10 : Ynysybwl R | 22 | 1 | 12 | 470 | 564 | 56 | 70 | 4 | 4
row 11 : Brynmawr RFC | 22 | 1 | 13 | 474 | 560 | 61 | 71 | 7 | 5
row 12 : Penarth RFC | 22 | 0 | 17 | 335 | 556 | 37 | 74 | 2 | 4
row 13 : Caerphilly RFC | 22 | 0 | 22 | 295 | 961 | 32 | 145 | 2 | 2
row 14 : Correct as of 26 May 2012 | Correct as of 26 May 2012 | Correct as of 26 May 2012 | Correct as of 26 May 2012 | Correct as of 26 May 2012 | Correct as of 26 May 2012 | Correct as of 26 May 2012 | Correct as of 26 May 2012 | Correct as of 26 May 2012 | Correct as of 26 May 2012 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: Which of the clubs had 556 points against?

Answer: Penarth RFC
[Table] header: Club | Played | Drawn | Lost | Points for | Points against | Tries for | Tries against | Try bonus | Losing bonus row 1 : Club | Played | Drawn | Lost | Points for | Points against | Tries for | Tries against | Try bonus | Losing bonus
row 2 : Mountain Ash RFC | 22 | 0 | 0 | 791 | 280 | 103 | 32 | 15 | 0
row 3 : Tredegar RFC | 22 | 0 | 3 | 786 | 361 | 107 | 39 | 17 | 2
row 4 : Llantrisant RFC | 22 | 0 | 9 | 617 | 520 | 79 | 71 | 11 | 2
row 5 : Rhydyfelin RFC | 22 | 1 | 8 | 593 | 489 | 87 | 61 | 8 | 2
row 6 : Penallta RFC | 22 | 0 | 11 | 433 | 407 | 56 | 49 | 7 | 4
row 7 : Tylorstown RFC | 22 | 1 | 11 | 501 | 517 | 66 | 63 | 7 | 5
row 8 : Fleur De Lys RFC | 22 | 1 | 12 | 535 | 575 | 65 | 70 | 10 | 5
row 9 : Llantwit Fardre RFC | 22 | 1 | 11 | 464 | 504 | 60 | 64 | 3 | 2
row 10 : Ynysybwl R | 22 | 1 | 12 | 470 | 564 | 56 | 70 | 4 | 4
row 11 : Brynmawr RFC | 22 | 1 | 13 | 474 | 560 | 61 | 71 | 7 | 5
row 12 : Penarth RFC | 22 | 0 | 17 | 335 | 556 | 37 | 74 | 2 | 4
row 13 : Caerphilly RFC | 22 | 0 | 22 | 295 | 961 | 32 | 145 | 2 | 2
row 14 : Correct as of 26 May 2012 | Correct as of 26 May 2012 | Correct as of 26 May 2012 | Correct as of 26 May 2012 | Correct as of 26 May 2012 | Correct as of 26 May 2012 | Correct as of 26 May 2012 | Correct as of 26 May 2012 | Correct as of 26 May 2012 | Correct as of 26 May 2012 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: How many tries against were there with 17 losses?

Answer: 74.0
[Table] header: Club | Played | Drawn | Lost | Points for | Points against | Tries for | Tries against | Try bonus | Losing bonus row 1 : Club | Played | Drawn | Lost | Points for | Points against | Tries for | Tries against | Try bonus | Losing bonus
row 2 : Mountain Ash RFC | 22 | 0 | 0 | 791 | 280 | 103 | 32 | 15 | 0
row 3 : Tredegar RFC | 22 | 0 | 3 | 786 | 361 | 107 | 39 | 17 | 2
row 4 : Llantrisant RFC | 22 | 0 | 9 | 617 | 520 | 79 | 71 | 11 | 2
row 5 : Rhydyfelin RFC | 22 | 1 | 8 | 593 | 489 | 87 | 61 | 8 | 2
row 6 : Penallta RFC | 22 | 0 | 11 | 433 | 407 | 56 | 49 | 7 | 4
row 7 : Tylorstown RFC | 22 | 1 | 11 | 501 | 517 | 66 | 63 | 7 | 5
row 8 : Fleur De Lys RFC | 22 | 1 | 12 | 535 | 575 | 65 | 70 | 10 | 5
row 9 : Llantwit Fardre RFC | 22 | 1 | 11 | 464 | 504 | 60 | 64 | 3 | 2
row 10 : Ynysybwl R | 22 | 1 | 12 | 470 | 564 | 56 | 70 | 4 | 4
row 11 : Brynmawr RFC | 22 | 1 | 13 | 474 | 560 | 61 | 71 | 7 | 5
row 12 : Penarth RFC | 22 | 0 | 17 | 335 | 556 | 37 | 74 | 2 | 4
row 13 : Caerphilly RFC | 22 | 0 | 22 | 295 | 961 | 32 | 145 | 2 | 2
row 14 : Correct as of 26 May 2012 | Correct as of 26 May 2012 | Correct as of 26 May 2012 | Correct as of 26 May 2012 | Correct as of 26 May 2012 | Correct as of 26 May 2012 | Correct as of 26 May 2012 | Correct as of 26 May 2012 | Correct as of 26 May 2012 | Correct as of 26 May 2012 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: How many losses were there with 103 tries for?

Answer: 0.0
[Table] header: Rank | Team | Country | Value ($M) | Revenue ($M) row 1 : 1 | Manchester United | England | 2,235 | 532
row 2 : 2 | Real Madrid | Spain | 1,877 | 695
row 3 : 3 | Barcelona | Spain | 1,307 | 653
row 4 : 4 | Arsenal | England | 1,292 | 364
row 5 : 5 | Bayern Munich | Germany | 1,235 | 466
row 6 : 6 | Milan | Italy | 989 | 341
row 7 : 7 | Chelsea | England | 761 | 362
row 8 : 8 | Liverpool | England | 619 | 295
row 9 : 9 | Juventus | Italy | 591 | 223
row 10 : 10 | Schalke 04 | Germany | 587 | 293
row 11 : 11 | Tottenham Hotspur | England | 564 | 262
row 12 : 12 | Internazionale | Italy | 490 | 307
row 13 : 13 | Manchester City | England | 443 | 246
row 14 : 14 | Borussia Dortmund | Germany | 394 | 197
row 15 : 15 | Lyon | France | 385 | 193
row 16 : 16 | Hamburg | Germany | 355 | 187
row 17 : 17 | Roma | Italy | 354 | 208
row 18 : 18 | Marseille | France | 349 | 218
row 19 : 19 | Valencia | Spain | 288 | 186
row 20 : 20 | Napoli | Italy | 283 | 167 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: Name the highest revenue for schalke 04 with rank less than 10

Answer: none
[Table] header: Rank | Team | Country | Value ($M) | Revenue ($M) row 1 : 1 | Manchester United | England | 2,235 | 532
row 2 : 2 | Real Madrid | Spain | 1,877 | 695
row 3 : 3 | Barcelona | Spain | 1,307 | 653
row 4 : 4 | Arsenal | England | 1,292 | 364
row 5 : 5 | Bayern Munich | Germany | 1,235 | 466
row 6 : 6 | Milan | Italy | 989 | 341
row 7 : 7 | Chelsea | England | 761 | 362
row 8 : 8 | Liverpool | England | 619 | 295
row 9 : 9 | Juventus | Italy | 591 | 223
row 10 : 10 | Schalke 04 | Germany | 587 | 293
row 11 : 11 | Tottenham Hotspur | England | 564 | 262
row 12 : 12 | Internazionale | Italy | 490 | 307
row 13 : 13 | Manchester City | England | 443 | 246
row 14 : 14 | Borussia Dortmund | Germany | 394 | 197
row 15 : 15 | Lyon | France | 385 | 193
row 16 : 16 | Hamburg | Germany | 355 | 187
row 17 : 17 | Roma | Italy | 354 | 208
row 18 : 18 | Marseille | France | 349 | 218
row 19 : 19 | Valencia | Spain | 288 | 186
row 20 : 20 | Napoli | Italy | 283 | 167 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: Name the rank for tottenham hotspur

Answer: 11.0
[Table] header: Rank | Team | Country | Value ($M) | Revenue ($M) row 1 : 1 | Manchester United | England | 2,235 | 532
row 2 : 2 | Real Madrid | Spain | 1,877 | 695
row 3 : 3 | Barcelona | Spain | 1,307 | 653
row 4 : 4 | Arsenal | England | 1,292 | 364
row 5 : 5 | Bayern Munich | Germany | 1,235 | 466
row 6 : 6 | Milan | Italy | 989 | 341
row 7 : 7 | Chelsea | England | 761 | 362
row 8 : 8 | Liverpool | England | 619 | 295
row 9 : 9 | Juventus | Italy | 591 | 223
row 10 : 10 | Schalke 04 | Germany | 587 | 293
row 11 : 11 | Tottenham Hotspur | England | 564 | 262
row 12 : 12 | Internazionale | Italy | 490 | 307
row 13 : 13 | Manchester City | England | 443 | 246
row 14 : 14 | Borussia Dortmund | Germany | 394 | 197
row 15 : 15 | Lyon | France | 385 | 193
row 16 : 16 | Hamburg | Germany | 355 | 187
row 17 : 17 | Roma | Italy | 354 | 208
row 18 : 18 | Marseille | France | 349 | 218
row 19 : 19 | Valencia | Spain | 288 | 186
row 20 : 20 | Napoli | Italy | 283 | 167 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: Name the least revenue for chelsea of england with rank less than 7

Answer: none
[Table] header: Rank | Team | Country | Value ($M) | Revenue ($M) row 1 : 1 | Manchester United | England | 2,235 | 532
row 2 : 2 | Real Madrid | Spain | 1,877 | 695
row 3 : 3 | Barcelona | Spain | 1,307 | 653
row 4 : 4 | Arsenal | England | 1,292 | 364
row 5 : 5 | Bayern Munich | Germany | 1,235 | 466
row 6 : 6 | Milan | Italy | 989 | 341
row 7 : 7 | Chelsea | England | 761 | 362
row 8 : 8 | Liverpool | England | 619 | 295
row 9 : 9 | Juventus | Italy | 591 | 223
row 10 : 10 | Schalke 04 | Germany | 587 | 293
row 11 : 11 | Tottenham Hotspur | England | 564 | 262
row 12 : 12 | Internazionale | Italy | 490 | 307
row 13 : 13 | Manchester City | England | 443 | 246
row 14 : 14 | Borussia Dortmund | Germany | 394 | 197
row 15 : 15 | Lyon | France | 385 | 193
row 16 : 16 | Hamburg | Germany | 355 | 187
row 17 : 17 | Roma | Italy | 354 | 208
row 18 : 18 | Marseille | France | 349 | 218
row 19 : 19 | Valencia | Spain | 288 | 186
row 20 : 20 | Napoli | Italy | 283 | 167 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: Name the total number of value for revenue more than 193 and rank less than 12 for manchester united

Answer: 1.0
[Table] header: Rank | Population | Name | Former Name | Municipality row 1 : 14 | 845 | Qeqertarsuaq | Godhavn Lievely | Qaasuitsup
row 2 : 15 | 656 | Qaanaaq | Thule | Qaasuitsup
row 3 : 16 | 558 | Kangaatsiaq | — | Qaasuitsup
row 4 : 17 | 512 | Kangerlussuaq | Bluie West-8 Søndre Str | Qeqqata
row 5 : 18 | 452 | Ittoqqortoormiit | Scoresbysund | Sermersooq
row 6 : 19 | 448 | Kullorsuaq | — | Qaasuitsup
row 7 : 20 | 353 | Kangaamiut | Gammel Sukkertoppen Sukker | Qeqqata
row 8 : 21 | 331 | Kuummiit | — | Sermersooq
row 9 : 22 | 267 | Kulusuk | Kap Dan | Sermersooq
row 10 : 23 | 263 | Alluitsup Paa | Sydprøven | Kujalleq
row 11 : 24 | 258 | Niaqornaarsuk | — | Qaasuitsup
row 12 : 25 | 246 | Tasiusaq | — | Qaasuitsup
row 13 : 26 | 235 | Saattut | — | Qaasuitsup
row 14 : 27 | 231 | Attu | — | Qaasuitsup
row 15 : 28 | 211 | Ikerasak | — | Qaasuitsup
row 16 : 29 | 203 | Qeqertarsuatsi | Fiskenæsset | Sermersooq
row 17 : 29 | 203 | Sermiligaaq | — | Sermersooq
row 18 : 31 | 201 | Nuussuaq | Kraulshavn | Qaasuitsup [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What is the lowest rank of Qaanaaq, which has a population greater than 231?

Answer: 15.0
[Table] header: Rank | Population | Name | Former Name | Municipality row 1 : 14 | 845 | Qeqertarsuaq | Godhavn Lievely | Qaasuitsup
row 2 : 15 | 656 | Qaanaaq | Thule | Qaasuitsup
row 3 : 16 | 558 | Kangaatsiaq | — | Qaasuitsup
row 4 : 17 | 512 | Kangerlussuaq | Bluie West-8 Søndre Str | Qeqqata
row 5 : 18 | 452 | Ittoqqortoormiit | Scoresbysund | Sermersooq
row 6 : 19 | 448 | Kullorsuaq | — | Qaasuitsup
row 7 : 20 | 353 | Kangaamiut | Gammel Sukkertoppen Sukker | Qeqqata
row 8 : 21 | 331 | Kuummiit | — | Sermersooq
row 9 : 22 | 267 | Kulusuk | Kap Dan | Sermersooq
row 10 : 23 | 263 | Alluitsup Paa | Sydprøven | Kujalleq
row 11 : 24 | 258 | Niaqornaarsuk | — | Qaasuitsup
row 12 : 25 | 246 | Tasiusaq | — | Qaasuitsup
row 13 : 26 | 235 | Saattut | — | Qaasuitsup
row 14 : 27 | 231 | Attu | — | Qaasuitsup
row 15 : 28 | 211 | Ikerasak | — | Qaasuitsup
row 16 : 29 | 203 | Qeqertarsuatsi | Fiskenæsset | Sermersooq
row 17 : 29 | 203 | Sermiligaaq | — | Sermersooq
row 18 : 31 | 201 | Nuussuaq | Kraulshavn | Qaasuitsup [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What is the rank of the town with a population of 258?

Answer: 1.0
[Table] header: Year | Population (Region total) | Population (Bundaberg) | Population (Gooburrum) | Population (Woongarra) | Population (Isis) | Population (Kolan) row 1 : 1921 | 20,731 | 9,276 | 2,922 | 2,513 | 3,500 | 2,520
row 2 : 1933 | 25,387 | 11,466 | 3,915 | 3,287 | 3,778 | 2,941
row 3 : 1947 | 29,237 | 15,926 | 3,825 | 3,345 | 3,639 | 2,502
row 4 : 1954 | 34,531 | 19,951 | 4,131 | 3,704 | 4,243 | 2,502
row 5 : 1961 | 37,968 | 22,839 | 4,372 | 4,149 | 3,951 | 2,657
row 6 : 1966 | 41,444 | 25,402 | 4,776 | 4,934 | 3,718 | 2,614
row 7 : 1971 | 43,332 | 27,324 | 4,519 | 5,150 | 3,666 | 2,673
row 8 : 1976 | 51,084 | 30,456 | 5,227 | 8,791 | 3,926 | 2,684
row 9 : 1981 | 52,444 | 30,937 | 5,261 | 9,865 | 4,023 | 2,358
row 10 : 1986 | 55,990 | 31,427 | 5,917 | 11,915 | 4,082 | 2,649
row 11 : 1991 | 64,188 | 32,737* | 7,117 | 16,491 | 4,825 | 3,018
row 12 : 1996 | 73,846 | 42,554 | 21,218 | 21,218 | 5,878 | 4,196
row 13 : 2001 | 77,323 | 43,146 | 23,598 | 23,598 | 6,045 | 4,534
row 14 : 2006 | 84,434 | 45,901 | 27,232 | 27,232 | 6,663 | 4,638 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: In what Year is the Isis Population 4,082 and the Regional Population less than 55,990?

Answer: 0.0
[Table] header: Year | Population (Region total) | Population (Bundaberg) | Population (Gooburrum) | Population (Woongarra) | Population (Isis) | Population (Kolan) row 1 : 1921 | 20,731 | 9,276 | 2,922 | 2,513 | 3,500 | 2,520
row 2 : 1933 | 25,387 | 11,466 | 3,915 | 3,287 | 3,778 | 2,941
row 3 : 1947 | 29,237 | 15,926 | 3,825 | 3,345 | 3,639 | 2,502
row 4 : 1954 | 34,531 | 19,951 | 4,131 | 3,704 | 4,243 | 2,502
row 5 : 1961 | 37,968 | 22,839 | 4,372 | 4,149 | 3,951 | 2,657
row 6 : 1966 | 41,444 | 25,402 | 4,776 | 4,934 | 3,718 | 2,614
row 7 : 1971 | 43,332 | 27,324 | 4,519 | 5,150 | 3,666 | 2,673
row 8 : 1976 | 51,084 | 30,456 | 5,227 | 8,791 | 3,926 | 2,684
row 9 : 1981 | 52,444 | 30,937 | 5,261 | 9,865 | 4,023 | 2,358
row 10 : 1986 | 55,990 | 31,427 | 5,917 | 11,915 | 4,082 | 2,649
row 11 : 1991 | 64,188 | 32,737* | 7,117 | 16,491 | 4,825 | 3,018
row 12 : 1996 | 73,846 | 42,554 | 21,218 | 21,218 | 5,878 | 4,196
row 13 : 2001 | 77,323 | 43,146 | 23,598 | 23,598 | 6,045 | 4,534
row 14 : 2006 | 84,434 | 45,901 | 27,232 | 27,232 | 6,663 | 4,638 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: When the Isis Population is 3,718 and the Gooburrum Population is less than 4,776, what is the highest Woongarra Population?

Answer: none
[Table] header: Date | Visitor | Score | Home | Decision | Attendance | Record row 1 : December 1 | Calgary | 3 – 2 | Detroit | Howard | 20,066 | 18–7–2
row 2 : December 4 | NY Islanders | 2 – 1 | Detroit | Howard | 20,066 | 18–8–2
row 3 : December 6 | New Jersey | 2 – 5 | Detroit | Osgood | 20,066 | 19–8–2
row 4 : December 9 | Detroit | 4 – 3 | Washington | Osgood | 18,277 | 20–8–2
row 5 : December 12 | Pittsburgh | 1 – 3 | Detroit | Osgood | 20,066 | 21–8–2
row 6 : December 13 | Detroit | 6 – 7 | Atlanta | Osgood | 17,559 | 21–9–2
row 7 : December 15 | Detroit | 2 – 3 | Florida | Osgood | 17,716 | 21–9–3
row 8 : December 17 | Detroit | 6 – 3 | Tampa Bay | Osgood | 21,204 | 22–9–3
row 9 : December 20 | Columbus | 3 – 4 | Detroit | Osgood | 20,066 | 23–9–3
row 10 : December 23 | Detroit | 3 – 2 | Chicago | Osgood | 20,543 | 24–9–3
row 11 : December 27 | Detroit | 4 – 1 | Dallas | Osgood | 18,584 | 25–9–3
row 12 : December 31 | Columbus | 2 – 3 | Detroit | Osgood | 20,066 | 26–9–3 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: When is a Decision of osgood, and a Score of 6 – 7?

Answer: December 13
[Table] header: Date | Visitor | Score | Home | Decision | Attendance | Record row 1 : December 1 | Calgary | 3 – 2 | Detroit | Howard | 20,066 | 18–7–2
row 2 : December 4 | NY Islanders | 2 – 1 | Detroit | Howard | 20,066 | 18–8–2
row 3 : December 6 | New Jersey | 2 – 5 | Detroit | Osgood | 20,066 | 19–8–2
row 4 : December 9 | Detroit | 4 – 3 | Washington | Osgood | 18,277 | 20–8–2
row 5 : December 12 | Pittsburgh | 1 – 3 | Detroit | Osgood | 20,066 | 21–8–2
row 6 : December 13 | Detroit | 6 – 7 | Atlanta | Osgood | 17,559 | 21–9–2
row 7 : December 15 | Detroit | 2 – 3 | Florida | Osgood | 17,716 | 21–9–3
row 8 : December 17 | Detroit | 6 – 3 | Tampa Bay | Osgood | 21,204 | 22–9–3
row 9 : December 20 | Columbus | 3 – 4 | Detroit | Osgood | 20,066 | 23–9–3
row 10 : December 23 | Detroit | 3 – 2 | Chicago | Osgood | 20,543 | 24–9–3
row 11 : December 27 | Detroit | 4 – 1 | Dallas | Osgood | 18,584 | 25–9–3
row 12 : December 31 | Columbus | 2 – 3 | Detroit | Osgood | 20,066 | 26–9–3 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: When has an Attendance larger than 20,066 in tampa bay?

Answer: December 17
[Table] header: Date | Visitor | Score | Home | Decision | Attendance | Record row 1 : December 1 | Calgary | 3 – 2 | Detroit | Howard | 20,066 | 18–7–2
row 2 : December 4 | NY Islanders | 2 – 1 | Detroit | Howard | 20,066 | 18–8–2
row 3 : December 6 | New Jersey | 2 – 5 | Detroit | Osgood | 20,066 | 19–8–2
row 4 : December 9 | Detroit | 4 – 3 | Washington | Osgood | 18,277 | 20–8–2
row 5 : December 12 | Pittsburgh | 1 – 3 | Detroit | Osgood | 20,066 | 21–8–2
row 6 : December 13 | Detroit | 6 – 7 | Atlanta | Osgood | 17,559 | 21–9–2
row 7 : December 15 | Detroit | 2 – 3 | Florida | Osgood | 17,716 | 21–9–3
row 8 : December 17 | Detroit | 6 – 3 | Tampa Bay | Osgood | 21,204 | 22–9–3
row 9 : December 20 | Columbus | 3 – 4 | Detroit | Osgood | 20,066 | 23–9–3
row 10 : December 23 | Detroit | 3 – 2 | Chicago | Osgood | 20,543 | 24–9–3
row 11 : December 27 | Detroit | 4 – 1 | Dallas | Osgood | 18,584 | 25–9–3
row 12 : December 31 | Columbus | 2 – 3 | Detroit | Osgood | 20,066 | 26–9–3 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What date has a Decision of osgood, and a Score of 3 – 4?

Answer: December 20
[Table] header: Heat | Lane | Name | Nationality | Time row 1 : 4 | 4 | Brooke Bennett | United States | 8:26.47
row 2 : 3 | 2 | Yana Klochkova | Ukraine | 8:29.84
row 3 : 3 | 4 | Kaitlin Sandeno | United States | 8:30.12
row 4 : 2 | 4 | Flavia Rigamonti | Switzerland | 8:30.44
row 5 : 4 | 5 | Hannah Stockbauer | Germany | 8:31.74
row 6 : 3 | 5 | Jana Henke | Germany | 8:31.86
row 7 : 4 | 3 | Sachiko Yamada | Japan | 8:33.06
row 8 : 3 | 7 | Chen Hua | China | 8:33.23
row 9 : 4 | 6 | Janelle Atkinson | Jamaica | 8:34.51
row 10 : 3 | 3 | Kirsten Vlieghuis | Netherlands | 8:35.80
row 11 : 2 | 5 | Chantal Strasser | Switzerland | 8:35.84
row 12 : 4 | 2 | Rachel Harris | Australia | 8:36.94
row 13 : 2 | 3 | Hayley Lewis | Australia | 8:38.75
row 14 : 3 | 6 | Éva Risztov | Hungary | 8:43.07
row 15 : 2 | 2 | Rebecca Cooke | Great Britain | 8:43.22
row 16 : 2 | 7 | Karine Legault | Canada | 8:43.56
row 17 : 3 | 1 | Irina Ufimtseva | Russia | 8:44.64
row 18 : 4 | 8 | Mirjana Bosevska | Macedonia | 8:46.39
row 19 : 2 | 8 | Hana Černá | Czech Republic | 8:47.64
row 20 : 1 | 3 | Ivanka Moralieva | Bulgaria | 8:52.61
row 21 : 1 | 4 | Patricia Villarreal | Mexico | 8:54.79
row 22 : 3 | 8 | Marianna Lymperta | Greece | 8:56.33
row 23 : 2 | 6 | Olga Beresnyeva | Ukraine | 9:00.12
row 24 : 1 | 5 | Lin Chi-Chan | Chinese Taipei | 9:01.09
row 25 : 2 | 1 | Adi Bichman | Israel | 9:01.90
row 26 : 1 | 6 | Cecilia Biagioli | Argentina | 9:04.02
row 27 : 4 | 1 | Claudia Poll | Costa Rica | DNS
row 28 : 4 | 7 | Joanne Malar | Canada | DNS [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: List a name that has a heat of at least 3 and a Lane of exactly 5.

Answer: Hannah Stockbauer
[Table] header: Rank | Lane | Name | Nationality | Time row 1 : 1 | 4 | Inge de Bruijn | Netherlands | 57.14
row 2 : 2 | 5 | Petria Thomas | Australia | 58.11
row 3 : 3 | 3 | Dara Torres | United States | 58.35
row 4 : 4 | 6 | Junko Onishi | Japan | 59.04
row 5 : 5 | 2 | Susie O'Neill | Australia | 59.05
row 6 : 6 | 7 | Johanna Sjöberg | Sweden | 59.15
row 7 : 7 | 8 | Mandy Loots | South Africa | 59.63
row 8 : 8 | 1 | Sophia Skou | Denmark | 59.89 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: Name the sum of time for lane of 1 and rank less than 8

Answer: none
[Table] header: Championship | Current champion(s) | Reign | Date won | Days held | Location row 1 : WWE Championship | Randy Orton | 8 | October 27, 2013 | 97 | Miami , Florida
row 2 : World Heavyweight Championship | John Cena | 3 | October 27, 2013 | 97 | Miami , Florida
row 3 : WWE Intercontinental Championship | Curtis Axel | 1 | June 16, 2013 | 230 | Rosemont , Illinois
row 4 : WWE United States Championship | Dean Ambrose | 1 | May 19, 2013 | 258 | St. Louis , Missouri
row 5 : WWE Tag Team Championship | Cody Rhodes and Goldust | 1 (2,1) | October 14, 2013 | 110 | St. Louis , Missouri
row 6 : WWE Divas Championship | AJ Lee | 1 | June 16, 2013 | 230 | Rosemont , Illinois [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: Name the championship with reign of 8

Answer: WWE Championship
[Table] header: Championship | Current champion(s) | Reign | Date won | Days held | Location row 1 : WWE Championship | Randy Orton | 8 | October 27, 2013 | 97 | Miami , Florida
row 2 : World Heavyweight Championship | John Cena | 3 | October 27, 2013 | 97 | Miami , Florida
row 3 : WWE Intercontinental Championship | Curtis Axel | 1 | June 16, 2013 | 230 | Rosemont , Illinois
row 4 : WWE United States Championship | Dean Ambrose | 1 | May 19, 2013 | 258 | St. Louis , Missouri
row 5 : WWE Tag Team Championship | Cody Rhodes and Goldust | 1 (2,1) | October 14, 2013 | 110 | St. Louis , Missouri
row 6 : WWE Divas Championship | AJ Lee | 1 | June 16, 2013 | 230 | Rosemont , Illinois [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: Name the days for current champions of dean ambrose

Answer: 258.0
[Table] header: Championship | Current champion(s) | Reign | Date won | Days held | Location row 1 : WWE Championship | Randy Orton | 8 | October 27, 2013 | 97 | Miami , Florida
row 2 : World Heavyweight Championship | John Cena | 3 | October 27, 2013 | 97 | Miami , Florida
row 3 : WWE Intercontinental Championship | Curtis Axel | 1 | June 16, 2013 | 230 | Rosemont , Illinois
row 4 : WWE United States Championship | Dean Ambrose | 1 | May 19, 2013 | 258 | St. Louis , Missouri
row 5 : WWE Tag Team Championship | Cody Rhodes and Goldust | 1 (2,1) | October 14, 2013 | 110 | St. Louis , Missouri
row 6 : WWE Divas Championship | AJ Lee | 1 | June 16, 2013 | 230 | Rosemont , Illinois [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: Name the location of reign 3

Answer: Miami , Florida
[Table] header: Championship | Current champion(s) | Reign | Date won | Days held | Location row 1 : WWE Championship | Randy Orton | 8 | October 27, 2013 | 97 | Miami , Florida
row 2 : World Heavyweight Championship | John Cena | 3 | October 27, 2013 | 97 | Miami , Florida
row 3 : WWE Intercontinental Championship | Curtis Axel | 1 | June 16, 2013 | 230 | Rosemont , Illinois
row 4 : WWE United States Championship | Dean Ambrose | 1 | May 19, 2013 | 258 | St. Louis , Missouri
row 5 : WWE Tag Team Championship | Cody Rhodes and Goldust | 1 (2,1) | October 14, 2013 | 110 | St. Louis , Missouri
row 6 : WWE Divas Championship | AJ Lee | 1 | June 16, 2013 | 230 | Rosemont , Illinois [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: Name the date won for wwe intercontinental championship

Answer: June 16, 2013
[Table] header: Japanese Title | Developer | Publisher | Genre | Console(s) | Initial Release Date row 1 : Ranma 1⁄2 Kakuren Bo | Banpresto | Banpresto | Puzzle (Maze) | Game Boy JP | 1990/06/28 June 28, 1990
row 2 : Ranma ½ | NCS | Masaya | Fighting (Side Scrolling) | PC Engine JP | 1990/12/07 December 7, 1990
row 3 : Ranma ½: Battle Renaissance | Altelier-Sai | Shogakukan | Fighting | PlayStation JP | 1996/12/06 December 6, 1996
row 4 : Ranma 1⁄2: Toraware | NCS | Masaya | Digital Comic | PC Engine JP | 1991/12/06 December 6, 1991
row 5 : Ranma 1⁄2: Kakuge | Banpresto | Banpresto | RPG (Quiz) | Game Boy JP | 1993/08/06 August 6, 1993
row 6 : Fever Ranma 1⁄2: On | Sankyo | Sankyo | Arcade | Pachinko JP | 2011/02 February 2011
row 7 : Ranma 1⁄2: Hiryu | Microvision | Bothtec | Text Adventure | PC-98 JP MSX JP | 1992
row 8 : Ranma 1⁄2: Bakuret | Atelier Double | Masaya DTMC | Fighting | SF JP SNES NA EU | 1992/12/25 December 25, 1992
row 9 : Ranma 1⁄2: Akaneko | Rumic Soft | Toho Company Ltd. | RPG | SF JP | 1993/10/22 October 22, 1993
row 10 : Ranma 1⁄2: Datou | NCS | Masaya | Fighting (Side Scrolling) | PC Engine JP | 1992/10/02 October 2, 1992
row 11 : Ranma 1⁄2: Ougi Ja | Rumic Soft | Rumic Soft | Puzzle (Paper-Rock-Scis | SF JP PC-98 JP | 1995/07/21 July 21, 1995
row 12 : Ranma 1⁄2: Chōn | NCS Irem | Masaya Irem | Fighting | SF JP SNES NA | 1992/03/27 March 27, 1992
row 13 : Ranma 1⁄2: Chougi Ram | Rumic Soft | Toho Company Ltd. | Fighting | SF JP | 1994/04/28 April 28, 1994
row 14 : Ranma 1⁄2: Netsuret | Banpresto | Banpresto | RPG (Fighter) | Game Boy JP | 1992/07/17 July 17, 1992
row 15 : Ranma 1⁄2: Byakuran | NCS | Masaya | Digital Comic | Mega-CD JP | 1993/04/23 April 23, 1993 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: When was Ranma ½: netsuretsu kakutouhen first release by Banpresto?

Answer: none
[Table] header: Japanese Title | Developer | Publisher | Genre | Console(s) | Initial Release Date row 1 : Ranma 1⁄2 Kakuren Bo | Banpresto | Banpresto | Puzzle (Maze) | Game Boy JP | 1990/06/28 June 28, 1990
row 2 : Ranma ½ | NCS | Masaya | Fighting (Side Scrolling) | PC Engine JP | 1990/12/07 December 7, 1990
row 3 : Ranma ½: Battle Renaissance | Altelier-Sai | Shogakukan | Fighting | PlayStation JP | 1996/12/06 December 6, 1996
row 4 : Ranma 1⁄2: Toraware | NCS | Masaya | Digital Comic | PC Engine JP | 1991/12/06 December 6, 1991
row 5 : Ranma 1⁄2: Kakuge | Banpresto | Banpresto | RPG (Quiz) | Game Boy JP | 1993/08/06 August 6, 1993
row 6 : Fever Ranma 1⁄2: On | Sankyo | Sankyo | Arcade | Pachinko JP | 2011/02 February 2011
row 7 : Ranma 1⁄2: Hiryu | Microvision | Bothtec | Text Adventure | PC-98 JP MSX JP | 1992
row 8 : Ranma 1⁄2: Bakuret | Atelier Double | Masaya DTMC | Fighting | SF JP SNES NA EU | 1992/12/25 December 25, 1992
row 9 : Ranma 1⁄2: Akaneko | Rumic Soft | Toho Company Ltd. | RPG | SF JP | 1993/10/22 October 22, 1993
row 10 : Ranma 1⁄2: Datou | NCS | Masaya | Fighting (Side Scrolling) | PC Engine JP | 1992/10/02 October 2, 1992
row 11 : Ranma 1⁄2: Ougi Ja | Rumic Soft | Rumic Soft | Puzzle (Paper-Rock-Scis | SF JP PC-98 JP | 1995/07/21 July 21, 1995
row 12 : Ranma 1⁄2: Chōn | NCS Irem | Masaya Irem | Fighting | SF JP SNES NA | 1992/03/27 March 27, 1992
row 13 : Ranma 1⁄2: Chougi Ram | Rumic Soft | Toho Company Ltd. | Fighting | SF JP | 1994/04/28 April 28, 1994
row 14 : Ranma 1⁄2: Netsuret | Banpresto | Banpresto | RPG (Fighter) | Game Boy JP | 1992/07/17 July 17, 1992
row 15 : Ranma 1⁄2: Byakuran | NCS | Masaya | Digital Comic | Mega-CD JP | 1993/04/23 April 23, 1993 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: In what genre did Microvision develop a game?

Answer: Text Adventure
[Table] header: Japanese Title | Developer | Publisher | Genre | Console(s) | Initial Release Date row 1 : Ranma 1⁄2 Kakuren Bo | Banpresto | Banpresto | Puzzle (Maze) | Game Boy JP | 1990/06/28 June 28, 1990
row 2 : Ranma ½ | NCS | Masaya | Fighting (Side Scrolling) | PC Engine JP | 1990/12/07 December 7, 1990
row 3 : Ranma ½: Battle Renaissance | Altelier-Sai | Shogakukan | Fighting | PlayStation JP | 1996/12/06 December 6, 1996
row 4 : Ranma 1⁄2: Toraware | NCS | Masaya | Digital Comic | PC Engine JP | 1991/12/06 December 6, 1991
row 5 : Ranma 1⁄2: Kakuge | Banpresto | Banpresto | RPG (Quiz) | Game Boy JP | 1993/08/06 August 6, 1993
row 6 : Fever Ranma 1⁄2: On | Sankyo | Sankyo | Arcade | Pachinko JP | 2011/02 February 2011
row 7 : Ranma 1⁄2: Hiryu | Microvision | Bothtec | Text Adventure | PC-98 JP MSX JP | 1992
row 8 : Ranma 1⁄2: Bakuret | Atelier Double | Masaya DTMC | Fighting | SF JP SNES NA EU | 1992/12/25 December 25, 1992
row 9 : Ranma 1⁄2: Akaneko | Rumic Soft | Toho Company Ltd. | RPG | SF JP | 1993/10/22 October 22, 1993
row 10 : Ranma 1⁄2: Datou | NCS | Masaya | Fighting (Side Scrolling) | PC Engine JP | 1992/10/02 October 2, 1992
row 11 : Ranma 1⁄2: Ougi Ja | Rumic Soft | Rumic Soft | Puzzle (Paper-Rock-Scis | SF JP PC-98 JP | 1995/07/21 July 21, 1995
row 12 : Ranma 1⁄2: Chōn | NCS Irem | Masaya Irem | Fighting | SF JP SNES NA | 1992/03/27 March 27, 1992
row 13 : Ranma 1⁄2: Chougi Ram | Rumic Soft | Toho Company Ltd. | Fighting | SF JP | 1994/04/28 April 28, 1994
row 14 : Ranma 1⁄2: Netsuret | Banpresto | Banpresto | RPG (Fighter) | Game Boy JP | 1992/07/17 July 17, 1992
row 15 : Ranma 1⁄2: Byakuran | NCS | Masaya | Digital Comic | Mega-CD JP | 1993/04/23 April 23, 1993 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What genre is the Banpresto game tittled Ranma ½: netsuretsu kakutouhen?

Answer: none
[Table] header: Round | Pick # | Overall | Name | Position | College row 1 : 2 | 13 | 40 | Shane Curry | Defensive End | Miami (FL)
row 2 : 3 | 14 | 69 | Dave McCloughan | Defensive Back | Colorado
row 3 : 4 | 13 | 96 | Mark Vander Poel | Offensive Tackle | Colorado
row 4 : 5 | 14 | 125 | Kerry Cash | Tight End | Texas
row 5 : 6 | 13 | 152 | Mel Agee | Defensive Tackle | Illinois
row 6 : 7 | 14 | 181 | James Bradley | Wide Receiver | Michigan State
row 7 : 8 | 13 | 208 | Tim Bruton | Tight End | Missouri
row 8 : 9 | 13 | 236 | Howard Griffith | Fullback | Illinois
row 9 : 10 | 13 | 263 | Frank Giannetti | Defensive End | Penn State
row 10 : 11 | 14 | 292 | Jerry Crafts | Offensive Tackle | Louisville
row 11 : 12 | 13 | 319 | Rob Luedeke | Center | Penn State [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: Position of defensive back, and an Overall smaller than 69 is what lowest pick #?

Answer: none
[Table] header: Round | Pick # | Overall | Name | Position | College row 1 : 2 | 13 | 40 | Shane Curry | Defensive End | Miami (FL)
row 2 : 3 | 14 | 69 | Dave McCloughan | Defensive Back | Colorado
row 3 : 4 | 13 | 96 | Mark Vander Poel | Offensive Tackle | Colorado
row 4 : 5 | 14 | 125 | Kerry Cash | Tight End | Texas
row 5 : 6 | 13 | 152 | Mel Agee | Defensive Tackle | Illinois
row 6 : 7 | 14 | 181 | James Bradley | Wide Receiver | Michigan State
row 7 : 8 | 13 | 208 | Tim Bruton | Tight End | Missouri
row 8 : 9 | 13 | 236 | Howard Griffith | Fullback | Illinois
row 9 : 10 | 13 | 263 | Frank Giannetti | Defensive End | Penn State
row 10 : 11 | 14 | 292 | Jerry Crafts | Offensive Tackle | Louisville
row 11 : 12 | 13 | 319 | Rob Luedeke | Center | Penn State [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: Round of 11, and a Pick # larger than 14 is the highest overall pick?

Answer: none
[Table] header: Round | Pick # | Overall | Name | Position | College row 1 : 2 | 13 | 40 | Shane Curry | Defensive End | Miami (FL)
row 2 : 3 | 14 | 69 | Dave McCloughan | Defensive Back | Colorado
row 3 : 4 | 13 | 96 | Mark Vander Poel | Offensive Tackle | Colorado
row 4 : 5 | 14 | 125 | Kerry Cash | Tight End | Texas
row 5 : 6 | 13 | 152 | Mel Agee | Defensive Tackle | Illinois
row 6 : 7 | 14 | 181 | James Bradley | Wide Receiver | Michigan State
row 7 : 8 | 13 | 208 | Tim Bruton | Tight End | Missouri
row 8 : 9 | 13 | 236 | Howard Griffith | Fullback | Illinois
row 9 : 10 | 13 | 263 | Frank Giannetti | Defensive End | Penn State
row 10 : 11 | 14 | 292 | Jerry Crafts | Offensive Tackle | Louisville
row 11 : 12 | 13 | 319 | Rob Luedeke | Center | Penn State [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: Overall of 208 occurred in what round?

Answer: 8.0
[Table] header: Place | Player | Country | Score | To par row 1 : 1 | Trevor Immelman | South Africa | 68-68=136 | –8
row 2 : 2 | Brandt Snedeker | United States | 69-68=137 | –7
row 3 : T3 | Steve Flesch | United States | 72-67=139 | –5
row 4 : T3 | Phil Mickelson | United States | 71-68=139 | –5
row 5 : T3 | Ian Poulter | England | 70-69=139 | –5
row 6 : T6 | Stephen Ames | Canada | 70-70=140 | –4
row 7 : T6 | Paul Casey | England | 71-69=140 | –4
row 8 : T8 | Stewart Cink | United States | 72-69=141 | –3
row 9 : T8 | Arron Oberholser | United States | 71-70=141 | –3
row 10 : T8 | Mike Weir | Canada | 73-68=141 | –3 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: what player has To par of –3, and a Score of 73-68=141?

Answer: Mike Weir
[Table] header: Place | Player | Country | Score | To par row 1 : 1 | Trevor Immelman | South Africa | 68-68=136 | –8
row 2 : 2 | Brandt Snedeker | United States | 69-68=137 | –7
row 3 : T3 | Steve Flesch | United States | 72-67=139 | –5
row 4 : T3 | Phil Mickelson | United States | 71-68=139 | –5
row 5 : T3 | Ian Poulter | England | 70-69=139 | –5
row 6 : T6 | Stephen Ames | Canada | 70-70=140 | –4
row 7 : T6 | Paul Casey | England | 71-69=140 | –4
row 8 : T8 | Stewart Cink | United States | 72-69=141 | –3
row 9 : T8 | Arron Oberholser | United States | 71-70=141 | –3
row 10 : T8 | Mike Weir | Canada | 73-68=141 | –3 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: what was steve flesch's to par when he was placed at t3 in the united states?

Answer: –5
[Table] header: Place | Player | Country | Score | To par row 1 : 1 | Trevor Immelman | South Africa | 68-68=136 | –8
row 2 : 2 | Brandt Snedeker | United States | 69-68=137 | –7
row 3 : T3 | Steve Flesch | United States | 72-67=139 | –5
row 4 : T3 | Phil Mickelson | United States | 71-68=139 | –5
row 5 : T3 | Ian Poulter | England | 70-69=139 | –5
row 6 : T6 | Stephen Ames | Canada | 70-70=140 | –4
row 7 : T6 | Paul Casey | England | 71-69=140 | –4
row 8 : T8 | Stewart Cink | United States | 72-69=141 | –3
row 9 : T8 | Arron Oberholser | United States | 71-70=141 | –3
row 10 : T8 | Mike Weir | Canada | 73-68=141 | –3 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: where did arron oberholser play?

Answer: United States
[Table] header: Place | Player | Country | Score | To par row 1 : 1 | Trevor Immelman | South Africa | 68-68=136 | –8
row 2 : 2 | Brandt Snedeker | United States | 69-68=137 | –7
row 3 : T3 | Steve Flesch | United States | 72-67=139 | –5
row 4 : T3 | Phil Mickelson | United States | 71-68=139 | –5
row 5 : T3 | Ian Poulter | England | 70-69=139 | –5
row 6 : T6 | Stephen Ames | Canada | 70-70=140 | –4
row 7 : T6 | Paul Casey | England | 71-69=140 | –4
row 8 : T8 | Stewart Cink | United States | 72-69=141 | –3
row 9 : T8 | Arron Oberholser | United States | 71-70=141 | –3
row 10 : T8 | Mike Weir | Canada | 73-68=141 | –3 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: what's the score in canada with place of t8?

Answer: 73-68=141
[Table] header: Date | Opponent | Score | Loss | Attendance | Record row 1 : June 1 | Angels | 11 - 8 | Fraser (0-2) | 50,255 | 27-22
row 2 : June 2 | Angels | 7 - 2 | Acker (1-3) | 50,261 | 27-23
row 3 : June 3 | @ Yankees | 5 - 3 | Leary (3-5) | 17,003 | 28-23
row 4 : June 4 | @ Yankees | 5 - 3 | Stottlemyre (5-2) | 15,955 | 28-24
row 5 : June 5 | @ Yankees | 4 - 1 | Johnson (0-1) | 21,213 | 29-24
row 6 : June 6 | @ Orioles | 6 - 4 | Timlin (4-3) | 26,539 | 29-25
row 7 : June 7 | @ Orioles | 6 - 4 | Guzmán (0-1) | 38,228 | 29-26
row 8 : June 8 | @ Orioles | 8 - 4 | Kilgus (0-1) | 45,569 | 30-26
row 9 : June 9 | @ Orioles | 3 - 2 | Ballard (3-7) | 27,783 | 31-26
row 10 : June 11 | @ Indians | 2 - 1 (12) | Acker (1-4) | 10,753 | 31-27
row 11 : June 12 | @ Indians | 1 - 0 | Candiotti (7-4) | 8,089 | 32-27
row 12 : June 13 | @ Indians | 1 - 0 | Nagy (2-7) | 8,371 | 33-27
row 13 : June 14 | Orioles | 9 - 1 | Robinson (3-6) | 50,287 | 34-27
row 14 : June 15 | Orioles | 8 - 4 | Guzmán (0-2) | 50,292 | 34-28
row 15 : June 16 | Orioles | 13 - 8 | Ward (0-3) | 50,273 | 34-29
row 16 : June 18 | Yankees | 4 - 2 | Timlin (5-4) | 50,271 | 34-30
row 17 : June 19 | Yankees | 3 - 0 | Key (10-3) | 50,281 | 34-31
row 18 : June 20 | Yankees | 6 - 1 | Leary (3-7) | 50,256 | 35-31
row 19 : June 21 | Indians | 8 - 4 | Swindell (3-6) | 50,283 | 36-31
row 20 : June 22 | Indians | 4 - 0 | Mutis (0-2) | 50,285 | 37-31
row 21 : June 23 | Indians | 3 - 1 | Candiotti (7-6) | 50,275 | 38-31
row 22 : June 24 | Indians | 4 - 3 | Nagy (3-8) | 50,263 | 39-31
row 23 : June 25 | @ Twins | 8 - 6 | Stottlemyre (8-3) | 26,350 | 39-32
row 24 : June 26 | @ Twins | 5 - 2 | Guthrie (5-4) | 25,503 | 40-32
row 25 : June 27 | @ Twins | 1 - 0 | Tapani (5-7) | 35,598 | 41-32
row 26 : June 28 | Mariners | 3 - 1 | Candiotti (7-7) | 50,297 | 41-33
row 27 : June 29 | Mariners | 4 - 0 | DeLucia (6-5) | 50,268 | 42-33
row 28 : June 30 | Mariners | 6 - 1 | Holman (7-8) | 50,298 | 43-33 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: How many people attended the game on June 18?

Answer: 1.0
[Table] header: First game | Played | Drawn | Lost | Percentage row 1 : 1998 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0.00%
row 2 : 2002 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 50.00%
row 3 : 1996 | 18 | 0 | 17 | 5.56%
row 4 : 1993 | 20 | 1 | 17 | 15.00%
row 5 : 1997 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.00%
row 6 : 1997 | 11 | 0 | 1 | 90.91%
row 7 : 1994 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 66.67%
row 8 : 1998 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 25.00%
row 9 : 1998 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.00%
row 10 : 2002 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.00%
row 11 : 1993 | 22 | 0 | 14 | 36.36%
row 12 : 2006 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.00%
row 13 : 1997 | 9 | 0 | 5 | 44.44%
row 14 : 1994 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 20.00%
row 15 : 1996 | 18 | 0 | 12 | 33.33%
row 16 : 1993 | 121 | 0 | 78 | 35.54% [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: When was the earliest first game with 11 played and 12 games lost?

Answer: 1996.0
[Table] header: First game | Played | Drawn | Lost | Percentage row 1 : 1998 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0.00%
row 2 : 2002 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 50.00%
row 3 : 1996 | 18 | 0 | 17 | 5.56%
row 4 : 1993 | 20 | 1 | 17 | 15.00%
row 5 : 1997 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.00%
row 6 : 1997 | 11 | 0 | 1 | 90.91%
row 7 : 1994 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 66.67%
row 8 : 1998 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 25.00%
row 9 : 1998 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.00%
row 10 : 2002 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.00%
row 11 : 1993 | 22 | 0 | 14 | 36.36%
row 12 : 2006 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.00%
row 13 : 1997 | 9 | 0 | 5 | 44.44%
row 14 : 1994 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 20.00%
row 15 : 1996 | 18 | 0 | 12 | 33.33%
row 16 : 1993 | 121 | 0 | 78 | 35.54% [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What is the average number of games played associated with a first game in 1997 and over 0 games drawn?

Answer: none
[Table] header: First game | Played | Drawn | Lost | Percentage row 1 : 1998 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0.00%
row 2 : 2002 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 50.00%
row 3 : 1996 | 18 | 0 | 17 | 5.56%
row 4 : 1993 | 20 | 1 | 17 | 15.00%
row 5 : 1997 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.00%
row 6 : 1997 | 11 | 0 | 1 | 90.91%
row 7 : 1994 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 66.67%
row 8 : 1998 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 25.00%
row 9 : 1998 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.00%
row 10 : 2002 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.00%
row 11 : 1993 | 22 | 0 | 14 | 36.36%
row 12 : 2006 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.00%
row 13 : 1997 | 9 | 0 | 5 | 44.44%
row 14 : 1994 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 20.00%
row 15 : 1996 | 18 | 0 | 12 | 33.33%
row 16 : 1993 | 121 | 0 | 78 | 35.54% [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: How many first games are associated with 5 games played and under 3 games lost?

Answer: none
[Table] header: First game | Played | Drawn | Lost | Percentage row 1 : 1998 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0.00%
row 2 : 2002 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 50.00%
row 3 : 1996 | 18 | 0 | 17 | 5.56%
row 4 : 1993 | 20 | 1 | 17 | 15.00%
row 5 : 1997 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.00%
row 6 : 1997 | 11 | 0 | 1 | 90.91%
row 7 : 1994 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 66.67%
row 8 : 1998 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 25.00%
row 9 : 1998 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.00%
row 10 : 2002 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.00%
row 11 : 1993 | 22 | 0 | 14 | 36.36%
row 12 : 2006 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.00%
row 13 : 1997 | 9 | 0 | 5 | 44.44%
row 14 : 1994 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 20.00%
row 15 : 1996 | 18 | 0 | 12 | 33.33%
row 16 : 1993 | 121 | 0 | 78 | 35.54% [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: How many games drawn when there are 78 losses and over 121 games played?

Answer: 0.0