sail/symbolic-instruction-tuning huggingface dataset:
[Table] header: Player | Pos. | Nationality | Previous team | Years of NBA experience [a ] row 1 : John Barnhill Category:Articles with  | G | United States | Detroit Pistons | 4
row 2 : Al Bianchi Category:Articles with | G | United States | Philadelphia 76ers | 10
row 3 : Ron Bonham Category:Articles with  | F | United States | Boston Celtics | 2
row 4 : Bob Boozer Category:Articles with | F | United States | Los Angeles Lakers | 6
row 5 : Nate Bowman Category:Articles with | C | United States | Cincinnati Royals | 0 [c ]
row 6 : Len Chappell Category:Articles | F/C | United States | New York Knicks | 4
row 7 : Barry Clemens Category:Articles | F | United States | New York Knicks | 1
row 8 : Keith Erickson Category:Articles with | G/F | United States | San Francisco Warriors | 1
row 9 : Johnny Kerr Category:Articles with  | F/C | United States | Baltimore Bullets | 12
row 10 : Jim King Category:Articles with h | G | United States | Los Angeles Lakers | 3
row 11 : Don Kojis Category:Articles with | F | United States | Detroit Pistons | 3
row 12 : McCoy McLemore Category:Artic | F/C | United States | San Francisco Warriors | 2
row 13 : Jeff Mullins Category:Articles with | G/F | United States | St. Louis Hawks | 2
row 14 : Jerry Sloan Category:Articles with  | G/F | United States | Baltimore Bullets | 1
row 15 : Tom Thacker Category:Articles with  | G/F | United States | Cincinnati Royals | 3
row 16 : John Thompson Category:Articles with h | F | United States | Boston Celtics | 2
row 17 : Gerry Ward Category:Articles with  | G | United States | Philadelphia 76ers | 3
row 18 : Jim Washington Category:Articles with h | F/C | United States | St. Louis Hawks | 1 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What Player has 10 Years of NBA experience?

Answer: Al Bianchi Category:Articles with
[Table] header: Player | Pos. | Nationality | Previous team | Years of NBA experience [a ] row 1 : John Barnhill Category:Articles with  | G | United States | Detroit Pistons | 4
row 2 : Al Bianchi Category:Articles with | G | United States | Philadelphia 76ers | 10
row 3 : Ron Bonham Category:Articles with  | F | United States | Boston Celtics | 2
row 4 : Bob Boozer Category:Articles with | F | United States | Los Angeles Lakers | 6
row 5 : Nate Bowman Category:Articles with | C | United States | Cincinnati Royals | 0 [c ]
row 6 : Len Chappell Category:Articles | F/C | United States | New York Knicks | 4
row 7 : Barry Clemens Category:Articles | F | United States | New York Knicks | 1
row 8 : Keith Erickson Category:Articles with | G/F | United States | San Francisco Warriors | 1
row 9 : Johnny Kerr Category:Articles with  | F/C | United States | Baltimore Bullets | 12
row 10 : Jim King Category:Articles with h | G | United States | Los Angeles Lakers | 3
row 11 : Don Kojis Category:Articles with | F | United States | Detroit Pistons | 3
row 12 : McCoy McLemore Category:Artic | F/C | United States | San Francisco Warriors | 2
row 13 : Jeff Mullins Category:Articles with | G/F | United States | St. Louis Hawks | 2
row 14 : Jerry Sloan Category:Articles with  | G/F | United States | Baltimore Bullets | 1
row 15 : Tom Thacker Category:Articles with  | G/F | United States | Cincinnati Royals | 3
row 16 : John Thompson Category:Articles with h | F | United States | Boston Celtics | 2
row 17 : Gerry Ward Category:Articles with  | G | United States | Philadelphia 76ers | 3
row 18 : Jim Washington Category:Articles with h | F/C | United States | St. Louis Hawks | 1 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What G/F Player has 3 Years in the NBA?

Answer: Tom Thacker Category:Articles with
[Table] header: Nat. | Name | Status | Contract length | Expiry date | Source row 1 : ANG | Rui Marques | Signed | 2 years | May 2010 | Leeds United
row 2 : ENG | Howson | Signed | 3 years 1 | June 2011 | Leeds United
row 3 : ENG | Edwards | Signed | 1 year | July 2009 | Leeds United
row 4 : ENG | Ovington | Signed | 1 year | July 2009 | Leeds United
row 5 : ENG | Prutton | Signed | 1 year | June 2010 | Leeds United
row 6 : SCO | Martin | Signed | 3 years | August 2011 | Leeds United
row 7 : ENG | Webb | Signed | 1 year | August 2009 | LUTV
row 8 : ENG | Delph | Signed | 4 years | August 2012 | Leeds United
row 9 : ENG | White | Signed | 4 years | December 2012 | Leeds United
row 10 : ENG | Lees | Signed | 3 years | January 2011 | Leeds United
row 11 : ENG | Hughes | Signed | 1 year 2 | June 2010 | Leeds United [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What source has delph as the name?

Answer: Leeds United
[Table] header: Tie no | Home team | Score | Away team | Attendance row 1 : 1 | Nantwich Town | 4–1 | FC Halifax Town | 1,091
row 2 : 2 | Kendal Town | 1–2 | Mossley | 208
row 3 : 3 | Southport | 3–2 | Vauxhall Motors | 593
row 4 : 4 | Frickley Athletic | 1–0 | Clitheroe | 271
row 5 : 5 | North Ferriby United | 1–4 | Newcastle Blue Star | 134
row 6 : 6 | Whitby Town | 2–2 | Blyth Spartans | 403
row 7 : 7 | Stocksbridge Park Steels | 1–2 | Curzon Ashton | 150
row 8 : 8 | Wakefield | 0–3 | Fleetwood Town | 161
row 9 : 9 | Droylsden | 2–1 | Bradford Park Avenue | 425
row 10 : 10 | Winterton Rangers | 1–1 | Newcastle Benfield | 116
row 11 : 11 | Durham City | 4–0 | Rossendale United | 142
row 12 : 12 | Whitley Bay | 3–1 | Hyde United | 364
row 13 : 13 | Guiseley | 2–2 | Garforth Town | 454
row 14 : 14 | Buxton | 1–0 | Burscough | 442
row 15 : 15 | Prescot Cables | 2–1 | Salford City | 220
row 16 : 16 | Workington | 0–0 | Harrogate Town | 413
row 17 : 17 | Gateshead | 1–1 | Witton Albion | 212
row 18 : 18 | Stalybridge Celtic | 4–0 | Farsley Celtic | 500
row 19 : 19 | Sheffield | 4–1 | Bacup Borough | 247
row 20 : 20 | Coalville Town | 2–1 | Stafford Rangers | 410
row 21 : 21 | Evesham United | 2–2 | Nuneaton Town | 405
row 22 : 22 | Lincoln United | 0–1 | Eastwood Town | 115
row 23 : 23 | Rugby Town | 5–1 | Long Eaton United | 213
row 24 : 24 | Shepshed Dynamo | 1–2 | Alfreton Town | 374
row 25 : 25 | Chasetown | 1–1 | Rothwell Town | 562
row 26 : 26 | Hucknall Town | 3–0 | Cradley Town | 230
row 27 : 27 | Belper Town | 4–1 | Redditch United | 301
row 28 : 28 | Boston United | 2–1 | Stamford | 1,125
row 29 : 29 | Retford United | 3–1 | Romulus | 209
row 30 : 30 | Stourbridge | 1–1 | Brackley Town | 199
row 31 : 31 | Halesowen Town | 3–0 | Gainsborough Trinity | 502
row 32 : 32 | Southam United | 1–1 | Atherstone Town | 247
row 33 : 33 | Stewarts & Lloyds Corby | 2–3 | Ilkeston Town | 177
row 34 : 34 | King's Lynn | 2–1 | Worksop Town | 1,080
row 35 : 35 | AFC Telford United | 3–2 | Corby Town | 1,262
row 36 : 36 | Worcester City | 0–1 | Tamworth | 898
row 37 : 37 | Hinckley United | 4–1 | Solihull Moors | 369
row 38 : 38 | Bromley | 0–1 | AFC Hornchurch | 581
row 39 : 39 | Thurrock | 0–5 | Boreham Wood | 90
row 40 : 40 | Dunstable Town | 2–3 | Chipstead | 142 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What is the total attendance when Stourbridge is the home team?

Answer: 1.0
[Table] header: Tie no | Home team | Score | Away team | Attendance row 1 : 1 | Nantwich Town | 4–1 | FC Halifax Town | 1,091
row 2 : 2 | Kendal Town | 1–2 | Mossley | 208
row 3 : 3 | Southport | 3–2 | Vauxhall Motors | 593
row 4 : 4 | Frickley Athletic | 1–0 | Clitheroe | 271
row 5 : 5 | North Ferriby United | 1–4 | Newcastle Blue Star | 134
row 6 : 6 | Whitby Town | 2–2 | Blyth Spartans | 403
row 7 : 7 | Stocksbridge Park Steels | 1–2 | Curzon Ashton | 150
row 8 : 8 | Wakefield | 0–3 | Fleetwood Town | 161
row 9 : 9 | Droylsden | 2–1 | Bradford Park Avenue | 425
row 10 : 10 | Winterton Rangers | 1–1 | Newcastle Benfield | 116
row 11 : 11 | Durham City | 4–0 | Rossendale United | 142
row 12 : 12 | Whitley Bay | 3–1 | Hyde United | 364
row 13 : 13 | Guiseley | 2–2 | Garforth Town | 454
row 14 : 14 | Buxton | 1–0 | Burscough | 442
row 15 : 15 | Prescot Cables | 2–1 | Salford City | 220
row 16 : 16 | Workington | 0–0 | Harrogate Town | 413
row 17 : 17 | Gateshead | 1–1 | Witton Albion | 212
row 18 : 18 | Stalybridge Celtic | 4–0 | Farsley Celtic | 500
row 19 : 19 | Sheffield | 4–1 | Bacup Borough | 247
row 20 : 20 | Coalville Town | 2–1 | Stafford Rangers | 410
row 21 : 21 | Evesham United | 2–2 | Nuneaton Town | 405
row 22 : 22 | Lincoln United | 0–1 | Eastwood Town | 115
row 23 : 23 | Rugby Town | 5–1 | Long Eaton United | 213
row 24 : 24 | Shepshed Dynamo | 1–2 | Alfreton Town | 374
row 25 : 25 | Chasetown | 1–1 | Rothwell Town | 562
row 26 : 26 | Hucknall Town | 3–0 | Cradley Town | 230
row 27 : 27 | Belper Town | 4–1 | Redditch United | 301
row 28 : 28 | Boston United | 2–1 | Stamford | 1,125
row 29 : 29 | Retford United | 3–1 | Romulus | 209
row 30 : 30 | Stourbridge | 1–1 | Brackley Town | 199
row 31 : 31 | Halesowen Town | 3–0 | Gainsborough Trinity | 502
row 32 : 32 | Southam United | 1–1 | Atherstone Town | 247
row 33 : 33 | Stewarts & Lloyds Corby | 2–3 | Ilkeston Town | 177
row 34 : 34 | King's Lynn | 2–1 | Worksop Town | 1,080
row 35 : 35 | AFC Telford United | 3–2 | Corby Town | 1,262
row 36 : 36 | Worcester City | 0–1 | Tamworth | 898
row 37 : 37 | Hinckley United | 4–1 | Solihull Moors | 369
row 38 : 38 | Bromley | 0–1 | AFC Hornchurch | 581
row 39 : 39 | Thurrock | 0–5 | Boreham Wood | 90
row 40 : 40 | Dunstable Town | 2–3 | Chipstead | 142 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What is the score when the attendance is greater than 134 and Workington is the home team?

Answer: 0–0
[Table] header: Coach | Years coached | Seasons | Wins | Losses | Percentage | Conference titles | NCAA row 1 : Luther Burleson | 1907–1908 | 2 | 10 | 9 | .526 | — | —
row 2 : Enoch Mills | 1909–1910 | 2 | 19 | 10 | .655 | — | —
row 3 : Ralph Gaze | 1911–1914 | 3 | 26 | 7 | .788 | — | —
row 4 : Norman Paine | 1914 | 1 | 1 | 8 | .111 | — | —
row 5 : Charles Moseley | 1915–1920 | 6 | 28 | 65 | .301 | 0 | —
row 6 : Frank Bridges | 1921–1926 | 6 | 51 | 78 | .395 | 0 | —
row 7 : Ralph Wolf | 1927–1941 | 15 | 148 | 129 | .534 | 1 | 0
row 8 : Bill Henderson | 1942–1943 and 1945–1961 | 19 | 201 | 233 | .463 | 4 | 3
row 9 : Van Sweet | 1944–1945 | 2 | 6 | 27 | .182 | 0 | 0
row 10 : Bill Menefee | 1962–1973 | 12 | 149 | 144 | .509 | 0 | 0
row 11 : Carroll Dawson | 1973–1976 | 4 | 42 | 51 | .452 | 0 | 0
row 12 : Jim Haller | 1976–1985 | 9 | 104 | 130 | .444 | 0 | 0
row 13 : Gene Iba | 1985–1992 | 7 | 98 | 106 | .480 | 0 | 1
row 14 : Darrell Johnson | 1992–1994 | 2 | 32 | 22 | .596 | 0 | 0
row 15 : Harry Miller | 1994–1999 | 5 | 56 | 87 | .392 | 0 | 0
row 16 : Dave Bliss | 1999–2003 | 4 | 61 | 57 | .517 | 0 | 0
row 17 : Scott Drew | 2003–2012 | 10 | 180 | 138 | .566 | 0 | 3 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: Which coach has 0 conference titles, more than 2 seasons, higher than 87 losses and 0 NCAA?

Answer: Bill Menefee, Jim Haller
[Table] header: Coach | Years coached | Seasons | Wins | Losses | Percentage | Conference titles | NCAA row 1 : Luther Burleson | 1907–1908 | 2 | 10 | 9 | .526 | — | —
row 2 : Enoch Mills | 1909–1910 | 2 | 19 | 10 | .655 | — | —
row 3 : Ralph Gaze | 1911–1914 | 3 | 26 | 7 | .788 | — | —
row 4 : Norman Paine | 1914 | 1 | 1 | 8 | .111 | — | —
row 5 : Charles Moseley | 1915–1920 | 6 | 28 | 65 | .301 | 0 | —
row 6 : Frank Bridges | 1921–1926 | 6 | 51 | 78 | .395 | 0 | —
row 7 : Ralph Wolf | 1927–1941 | 15 | 148 | 129 | .534 | 1 | 0
row 8 : Bill Henderson | 1942–1943 and 1945–1961 | 19 | 201 | 233 | .463 | 4 | 3
row 9 : Van Sweet | 1944–1945 | 2 | 6 | 27 | .182 | 0 | 0
row 10 : Bill Menefee | 1962–1973 | 12 | 149 | 144 | .509 | 0 | 0
row 11 : Carroll Dawson | 1973–1976 | 4 | 42 | 51 | .452 | 0 | 0
row 12 : Jim Haller | 1976–1985 | 9 | 104 | 130 | .444 | 0 | 0
row 13 : Gene Iba | 1985–1992 | 7 | 98 | 106 | .480 | 0 | 1
row 14 : Darrell Johnson | 1992–1994 | 2 | 32 | 22 | .596 | 0 | 0
row 15 : Harry Miller | 1994–1999 | 5 | 56 | 87 | .392 | 0 | 0
row 16 : Dave Bliss | 1999–2003 | 4 | 61 | 57 | .517 | 0 | 0
row 17 : Scott Drew | 2003–2012 | 10 | 180 | 138 | .566 | 0 | 3 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What are coach Bill Henderson's highest wins with more than 233 losses?

Answer: none
[Table] header: Central Murray | Wins | Byes | Losses | Draws | Against row 1 : Kerang | 17 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 887
row 2 : Balranald | 15 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1025
row 3 : Tyntynder | 13 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 1135
row 4 : Cohuna Kangas | 13 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 1275
row 5 : Tooleybuc Manangatang | 11 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 1111
row 6 : Lake Boga | 10 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 1268
row 7 : Swan Hill | 10 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 1316
row 8 : Woorineen | 7 | 0 | 11 | 0 | 1605
row 9 : Leitchville Gunbower | 6 | 0 | 12 | 0 | 1668
row 10 : Koondrook-Barham | 3 | 0 | 15 | 0 | 1876
row 11 : Lalbert | 2 | 0 | 16 | 0 | 2247
row 12 : Nyah Nyah West Utd | 1 | 0 | 17 | 0 | 2284 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What is the sum of the draws with less than 2284 against, 8 losses, and more than 10 wins?

Answer: none
[Table] header: Central Murray | Wins | Byes | Losses | Draws | Against row 1 : Kerang | 17 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 887
row 2 : Balranald | 15 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1025
row 3 : Tyntynder | 13 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 1135
row 4 : Cohuna Kangas | 13 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 1275
row 5 : Tooleybuc Manangatang | 11 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 1111
row 6 : Lake Boga | 10 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 1268
row 7 : Swan Hill | 10 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 1316
row 8 : Woorineen | 7 | 0 | 11 | 0 | 1605
row 9 : Leitchville Gunbower | 6 | 0 | 12 | 0 | 1668
row 10 : Koondrook-Barham | 3 | 0 | 15 | 0 | 1876
row 11 : Lalbert | 2 | 0 | 16 | 0 | 2247
row 12 : Nyah Nyah West Utd | 1 | 0 | 17 | 0 | 2284 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What is the average number of against with 11 wins and less than 0 draws?

Answer: none
[Table] header: Central Murray | Wins | Byes | Losses | Draws | Against row 1 : Kerang | 17 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 887
row 2 : Balranald | 15 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1025
row 3 : Tyntynder | 13 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 1135
row 4 : Cohuna Kangas | 13 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 1275
row 5 : Tooleybuc Manangatang | 11 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 1111
row 6 : Lake Boga | 10 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 1268
row 7 : Swan Hill | 10 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 1316
row 8 : Woorineen | 7 | 0 | 11 | 0 | 1605
row 9 : Leitchville Gunbower | 6 | 0 | 12 | 0 | 1668
row 10 : Koondrook-Barham | 3 | 0 | 15 | 0 | 1876
row 11 : Lalbert | 2 | 0 | 16 | 0 | 2247
row 12 : Nyah Nyah West Utd | 1 | 0 | 17 | 0 | 2284 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What is the total number of losses of the central murray of tooleybuc manangatang, which has less than 0 draws?

Answer: 0.0
[Table] header: Central Murray | Wins | Byes | Losses | Draws | Against row 1 : Kerang | 17 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 887
row 2 : Balranald | 15 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1025
row 3 : Tyntynder | 13 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 1135
row 4 : Cohuna Kangas | 13 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 1275
row 5 : Tooleybuc Manangatang | 11 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 1111
row 6 : Lake Boga | 10 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 1268
row 7 : Swan Hill | 10 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 1316
row 8 : Woorineen | 7 | 0 | 11 | 0 | 1605
row 9 : Leitchville Gunbower | 6 | 0 | 12 | 0 | 1668
row 10 : Koondrook-Barham | 3 | 0 | 15 | 0 | 1876
row 11 : Lalbert | 2 | 0 | 16 | 0 | 2247
row 12 : Nyah Nyah West Utd | 1 | 0 | 17 | 0 | 2284 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What is the highest number of losses of the central murray of lake boga, which has less than 10 wins?

Answer: none
[Table] header: Central Murray | Wins | Byes | Losses | Draws | Against row 1 : Kerang | 17 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 887
row 2 : Balranald | 15 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1025
row 3 : Tyntynder | 13 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 1135
row 4 : Cohuna Kangas | 13 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 1275
row 5 : Tooleybuc Manangatang | 11 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 1111
row 6 : Lake Boga | 10 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 1268
row 7 : Swan Hill | 10 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 1316
row 8 : Woorineen | 7 | 0 | 11 | 0 | 1605
row 9 : Leitchville Gunbower | 6 | 0 | 12 | 0 | 1668
row 10 : Koondrook-Barham | 3 | 0 | 15 | 0 | 1876
row 11 : Lalbert | 2 | 0 | 16 | 0 | 2247
row 12 : Nyah Nyah West Utd | 1 | 0 | 17 | 0 | 2284 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What is the average number of draws of the central murray of leitchville gunbower, which has less than 0 byes?

Answer: none
[Table] header: Central Murray | Wins | Byes | Losses | Draws | Against row 1 : Kerang | 17 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 887
row 2 : Balranald | 15 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1025
row 3 : Tyntynder | 13 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 1135
row 4 : Cohuna Kangas | 13 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 1275
row 5 : Tooleybuc Manangatang | 11 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 1111
row 6 : Lake Boga | 10 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 1268
row 7 : Swan Hill | 10 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 1316
row 8 : Woorineen | 7 | 0 | 11 | 0 | 1605
row 9 : Leitchville Gunbower | 6 | 0 | 12 | 0 | 1668
row 10 : Koondrook-Barham | 3 | 0 | 15 | 0 | 1876
row 11 : Lalbert | 2 | 0 | 16 | 0 | 2247
row 12 : Nyah Nyah West Utd | 1 | 0 | 17 | 0 | 2284 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What is the total number of wins of the central murray of koondrook-barham, which has more than 0 draws?

Answer: 0.0
[Table] header: Opposing Teams | Against | Date | Venue | Status row 1 : South Africa | 8 | 05/01/1952 | Twickenham , London | Test Match
row 2 : Wales | 8 | 19/01/1952 | Twickenham , London | Five Nations
row 3 : Scotland | 3 | 15/03/1952 | Murrayfield , Edinburgh | Five Nations
row 4 : Ireland | 0 | 29/03/1952 | Twickenham , London | Five Nations
row 5 : France | 3 | 05/04/1952 | Stade Colombes , Paris | Five Nations [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What is the date when France is the opposing team?

Answer: 05/04/1952
[Table] header: Opposing Teams | Against | Date | Venue | Status row 1 : South Africa | 8 | 05/01/1952 | Twickenham , London | Test Match
row 2 : Wales | 8 | 19/01/1952 | Twickenham , London | Five Nations
row 3 : Scotland | 3 | 15/03/1952 | Murrayfield , Edinburgh | Five Nations
row 4 : Ireland | 0 | 29/03/1952 | Twickenham , London | Five Nations
row 5 : France | 3 | 05/04/1952 | Stade Colombes , Paris | Five Nations [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What is the venue with more than 3 against, and South Africa is the opposing team?

Answer: Twickenham , London
[Table] header: Opposing Teams | Against | Date | Venue | Status row 1 : South Africa | 8 | 05/01/1952 | Twickenham , London | Test Match
row 2 : Wales | 8 | 19/01/1952 | Twickenham , London | Five Nations
row 3 : Scotland | 3 | 15/03/1952 | Murrayfield , Edinburgh | Five Nations
row 4 : Ireland | 0 | 29/03/1952 | Twickenham , London | Five Nations
row 5 : France | 3 | 05/04/1952 | Stade Colombes , Paris | Five Nations [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What is the venue for the Status of Five Nations and 0 againts?

Answer: Twickenham , London
[Table] header: Version | Fairing | CCBs | SRBs | Upper stage | Payload to LEO | Payload to GTO | Launches to date row 1 : 401 | 4 m | 1 | – | SEC | 9,797kg | 4,750kg | 18
row 2 : 402 | 4 m | 1 | – | DEC | 12,500kg | – | 0
row 3 : 411 | 4 m | 1 | 1 | SEC | 12,150kg | 5,950kg | 3
row 4 : 412 | 4 m | 1 | 1 | DEC | – | – | 0
row 5 : 421 | 4 m | 1 | 2 | SEC | 14,067kg | 6,890kg | 3
row 6 : 431 | 4 m | 1 | 3 | SEC | 15,718kg | 7,700kg | 2
row 7 : 501 | 5.4 m | 1 | – | SEC | 8,123kg | 3,775kg | 4
row 8 : 502 | 5.4 m | 1 | – | DEC | – | – | 0
row 9 : 511 | 5.4 m | 1 | 1 | SEC | 10,986kg | 5,250kg | 0
row 10 : 512 | 5.4 m | 1 | 1 | DEC | – | – | 0
row 11 : 521 | 5.4 m | 1 | 2 | SEC | 13,490kg | 6,475kg | 2
row 12 : 522 | 5.4 m | 1 | 2 | DEC | – | – | 0
row 13 : 531 | 5.4 m | 1 | 3 | SEC | 15,575kg | 7,475kg | 3
row 14 : 532 | 5.4 m | 1 | 3 | DEC | – | – | 0
row 15 : 541 | 5.4 m | 1 | 4 | SEC | 17,443kg | 8,290kg | 1
row 16 : 542 | 5.4 m | 1 | 4 | DEC | – | – | 0
row 17 : 551 | 5.4 m | 1 | 5 | SEC | 18,814kg | 8,900kg | 4
row 18 : 552 | 5.4 m | 1 | 5 | DEC | 20,520kg | – | 0
row 19 : Heavy (HLV/5H1) | 5.4 m | 3 | – | SEC | – | – | 0
row 20 : Heavy (HLV DEC/5H2) | 5.4 m | 3 | – | DEC | 29,400kg | – | 0 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What Upper stage has Launches to date of 0, and Version of 532?

Answer: DEC
[Table] header: Version | Fairing | CCBs | SRBs | Upper stage | Payload to LEO | Payload to GTO | Launches to date row 1 : 401 | 4 m | 1 | – | SEC | 9,797kg | 4,750kg | 18
row 2 : 402 | 4 m | 1 | – | DEC | 12,500kg | – | 0
row 3 : 411 | 4 m | 1 | 1 | SEC | 12,150kg | 5,950kg | 3
row 4 : 412 | 4 m | 1 | 1 | DEC | – | – | 0
row 5 : 421 | 4 m | 1 | 2 | SEC | 14,067kg | 6,890kg | 3
row 6 : 431 | 4 m | 1 | 3 | SEC | 15,718kg | 7,700kg | 2
row 7 : 501 | 5.4 m | 1 | – | SEC | 8,123kg | 3,775kg | 4
row 8 : 502 | 5.4 m | 1 | – | DEC | – | – | 0
row 9 : 511 | 5.4 m | 1 | 1 | SEC | 10,986kg | 5,250kg | 0
row 10 : 512 | 5.4 m | 1 | 1 | DEC | – | – | 0
row 11 : 521 | 5.4 m | 1 | 2 | SEC | 13,490kg | 6,475kg | 2
row 12 : 522 | 5.4 m | 1 | 2 | DEC | – | – | 0
row 13 : 531 | 5.4 m | 1 | 3 | SEC | 15,575kg | 7,475kg | 3
row 14 : 532 | 5.4 m | 1 | 3 | DEC | – | – | 0
row 15 : 541 | 5.4 m | 1 | 4 | SEC | 17,443kg | 8,290kg | 1
row 16 : 542 | 5.4 m | 1 | 4 | DEC | – | – | 0
row 17 : 551 | 5.4 m | 1 | 5 | SEC | 18,814kg | 8,900kg | 4
row 18 : 552 | 5.4 m | 1 | 5 | DEC | 20,520kg | – | 0
row 19 : Heavy (HLV/5H1) | 5.4 m | 3 | – | SEC | – | – | 0
row 20 : Heavy (HLV DEC/5H2) | 5.4 m | 3 | – | DEC | 29,400kg | – | 0 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What is the greatest CCBs with Launches to date of 4, and a Payload to GTO of 8,900kg?

Answer: 1.0
[Table] header: Version | Fairing | CCBs | SRBs | Upper stage | Payload to LEO | Payload to GTO | Launches to date row 1 : 401 | 4 m | 1 | – | SEC | 9,797kg | 4,750kg | 18
row 2 : 402 | 4 m | 1 | – | DEC | 12,500kg | – | 0
row 3 : 411 | 4 m | 1 | 1 | SEC | 12,150kg | 5,950kg | 3
row 4 : 412 | 4 m | 1 | 1 | DEC | – | – | 0
row 5 : 421 | 4 m | 1 | 2 | SEC | 14,067kg | 6,890kg | 3
row 6 : 431 | 4 m | 1 | 3 | SEC | 15,718kg | 7,700kg | 2
row 7 : 501 | 5.4 m | 1 | – | SEC | 8,123kg | 3,775kg | 4
row 8 : 502 | 5.4 m | 1 | – | DEC | – | – | 0
row 9 : 511 | 5.4 m | 1 | 1 | SEC | 10,986kg | 5,250kg | 0
row 10 : 512 | 5.4 m | 1 | 1 | DEC | – | – | 0
row 11 : 521 | 5.4 m | 1 | 2 | SEC | 13,490kg | 6,475kg | 2
row 12 : 522 | 5.4 m | 1 | 2 | DEC | – | – | 0
row 13 : 531 | 5.4 m | 1 | 3 | SEC | 15,575kg | 7,475kg | 3
row 14 : 532 | 5.4 m | 1 | 3 | DEC | – | – | 0
row 15 : 541 | 5.4 m | 1 | 4 | SEC | 17,443kg | 8,290kg | 1
row 16 : 542 | 5.4 m | 1 | 4 | DEC | – | – | 0
row 17 : 551 | 5.4 m | 1 | 5 | SEC | 18,814kg | 8,900kg | 4
row 18 : 552 | 5.4 m | 1 | 5 | DEC | 20,520kg | – | 0
row 19 : Heavy (HLV/5H1) | 5.4 m | 3 | – | SEC | – | – | 0
row 20 : Heavy (HLV DEC/5H2) | 5.4 m | 3 | – | DEC | 29,400kg | – | 0 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What Payload to GTO has CCBs larger than 1, and a Payload to LEO of 29,400kg?

Answer: –
[Table] header: Version | Fairing | CCBs | SRBs | Upper stage | Payload to LEO | Payload to GTO | Launches to date row 1 : 401 | 4 m | 1 | – | SEC | 9,797kg | 4,750kg | 18
row 2 : 402 | 4 m | 1 | – | DEC | 12,500kg | – | 0
row 3 : 411 | 4 m | 1 | 1 | SEC | 12,150kg | 5,950kg | 3
row 4 : 412 | 4 m | 1 | 1 | DEC | – | – | 0
row 5 : 421 | 4 m | 1 | 2 | SEC | 14,067kg | 6,890kg | 3
row 6 : 431 | 4 m | 1 | 3 | SEC | 15,718kg | 7,700kg | 2
row 7 : 501 | 5.4 m | 1 | – | SEC | 8,123kg | 3,775kg | 4
row 8 : 502 | 5.4 m | 1 | – | DEC | – | – | 0
row 9 : 511 | 5.4 m | 1 | 1 | SEC | 10,986kg | 5,250kg | 0
row 10 : 512 | 5.4 m | 1 | 1 | DEC | – | – | 0
row 11 : 521 | 5.4 m | 1 | 2 | SEC | 13,490kg | 6,475kg | 2
row 12 : 522 | 5.4 m | 1 | 2 | DEC | – | – | 0
row 13 : 531 | 5.4 m | 1 | 3 | SEC | 15,575kg | 7,475kg | 3
row 14 : 532 | 5.4 m | 1 | 3 | DEC | – | – | 0
row 15 : 541 | 5.4 m | 1 | 4 | SEC | 17,443kg | 8,290kg | 1
row 16 : 542 | 5.4 m | 1 | 4 | DEC | – | – | 0
row 17 : 551 | 5.4 m | 1 | 5 | SEC | 18,814kg | 8,900kg | 4
row 18 : 552 | 5.4 m | 1 | 5 | DEC | 20,520kg | – | 0
row 19 : Heavy (HLV/5H1) | 5.4 m | 3 | – | SEC | – | – | 0
row 20 : Heavy (HLV DEC/5H2) | 5.4 m | 3 | – | DEC | 29,400kg | – | 0 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What is the greatest CCBs with a Payload to GTO of –, and an Upper stage of sec?

Answer: 3.0
[Table] header: Version | Fairing | CCBs | SRBs | Upper stage | Payload to LEO | Payload to GTO | Launches to date row 1 : 401 | 4 m | 1 | – | SEC | 9,797kg | 4,750kg | 18
row 2 : 402 | 4 m | 1 | – | DEC | 12,500kg | – | 0
row 3 : 411 | 4 m | 1 | 1 | SEC | 12,150kg | 5,950kg | 3
row 4 : 412 | 4 m | 1 | 1 | DEC | – | – | 0
row 5 : 421 | 4 m | 1 | 2 | SEC | 14,067kg | 6,890kg | 3
row 6 : 431 | 4 m | 1 | 3 | SEC | 15,718kg | 7,700kg | 2
row 7 : 501 | 5.4 m | 1 | – | SEC | 8,123kg | 3,775kg | 4
row 8 : 502 | 5.4 m | 1 | – | DEC | – | – | 0
row 9 : 511 | 5.4 m | 1 | 1 | SEC | 10,986kg | 5,250kg | 0
row 10 : 512 | 5.4 m | 1 | 1 | DEC | – | – | 0
row 11 : 521 | 5.4 m | 1 | 2 | SEC | 13,490kg | 6,475kg | 2
row 12 : 522 | 5.4 m | 1 | 2 | DEC | – | – | 0
row 13 : 531 | 5.4 m | 1 | 3 | SEC | 15,575kg | 7,475kg | 3
row 14 : 532 | 5.4 m | 1 | 3 | DEC | – | – | 0
row 15 : 541 | 5.4 m | 1 | 4 | SEC | 17,443kg | 8,290kg | 1
row 16 : 542 | 5.4 m | 1 | 4 | DEC | – | – | 0
row 17 : 551 | 5.4 m | 1 | 5 | SEC | 18,814kg | 8,900kg | 4
row 18 : 552 | 5.4 m | 1 | 5 | DEC | 20,520kg | – | 0
row 19 : Heavy (HLV/5H1) | 5.4 m | 3 | – | SEC | – | – | 0
row 20 : Heavy (HLV DEC/5H2) | 5.4 m | 3 | – | DEC | 29,400kg | – | 0 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What is the total Launches to date with a Version of 541, and CCBs smaller than 1?

Answer: 0.0
[Table] header: Standard order | English translation | Transcription (based on Pinyin) | Traditional Chinese | Simplified Chinese row 1 : 1 | Grieving I Make My Plaint | Xi Song | 惜誦 | 惜诵
row 2 : 2 | Crossing the River | She Jiang | 涉江 | 涉江
row 3 : 3 | A Lament for Ying | Ai Ying | 哀郢 | 哀郢
row 4 : 4 | The Outpouring of Sad Thoughts | Chou Si | 抽思 | 抽思
row 5 : 5 | Embracing Sand | Huai Sha | 懷沙 | 怀沙
row 6 : 6 | Thinking of a Fair One | Si Meiren | 思美人 | 思美人
row 7 : 7 | Alas for the Days Gone By | Xi Wangri | 昔往日 | 昔往日
row 8 : 8 | In Praise of the Orange-Tree | Ju Song | 橘頌 | 橘颂
row 9 : 9 | Grieving at the Eddying Wind | Bei Hui Feng | 悲回風 | 悲回风 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What is the highest standard order for the Transcription based on Pinyin, She Jiang?

Answer: 2.0
[Table] header: Standard order | English translation | Transcription (based on Pinyin) | Traditional Chinese | Simplified Chinese row 1 : 1 | Grieving I Make My Plaint | Xi Song | 惜誦 | 惜诵
row 2 : 2 | Crossing the River | She Jiang | 涉江 | 涉江
row 3 : 3 | A Lament for Ying | Ai Ying | 哀郢 | 哀郢
row 4 : 4 | The Outpouring of Sad Thoughts | Chou Si | 抽思 | 抽思
row 5 : 5 | Embracing Sand | Huai Sha | 懷沙 | 怀沙
row 6 : 6 | Thinking of a Fair One | Si Meiren | 思美人 | 思美人
row 7 : 7 | Alas for the Days Gone By | Xi Wangri | 昔往日 | 昔往日
row 8 : 8 | In Praise of the Orange-Tree | Ju Song | 橘頌 | 橘颂
row 9 : 9 | Grieving at the Eddying Wind | Bei Hui Feng | 悲回風 | 悲回风 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What is the english translation of the traditional Chinese word, 哀郢?

Answer: A Lament for Ying
[Table] header: Standard order | English translation | Transcription (based on Pinyin) | Traditional Chinese | Simplified Chinese row 1 : 1 | Grieving I Make My Plaint | Xi Song | 惜誦 | 惜诵
row 2 : 2 | Crossing the River | She Jiang | 涉江 | 涉江
row 3 : 3 | A Lament for Ying | Ai Ying | 哀郢 | 哀郢
row 4 : 4 | The Outpouring of Sad Thoughts | Chou Si | 抽思 | 抽思
row 5 : 5 | Embracing Sand | Huai Sha | 懷沙 | 怀沙
row 6 : 6 | Thinking of a Fair One | Si Meiren | 思美人 | 思美人
row 7 : 7 | Alas for the Days Gone By | Xi Wangri | 昔往日 | 昔往日
row 8 : 8 | In Praise of the Orange-Tree | Ju Song | 橘頌 | 橘颂
row 9 : 9 | Grieving at the Eddying Wind | Bei Hui Feng | 悲回風 | 悲回风 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What is the simplified Chinese with a standard order over 4, and the transcription of Bei Hui Feng?

Answer: 悲回风
[Table] header: Outcome | Date | Category | Tournament | Surface | Opponent | Score row 1 : Winner | 21 July 2008 | Futures | Irun, Spain | Clay | Pablo Martin-Adalia | 7–6 (7–1) , 7–
row 2 : Runner-up | 22 September 2008 | Futures | Martos, Spain | Hard | Roberto Bautista-Agut | 6–3, 3–6, 2–6
row 3 : Winner | 20 October 2008 | Futures | Rodez, France | Hard | Guillermo Alcaide | 6–3, 6–4
row 4 : Runner-up | 24 November 2008 | Futures | Dubai, United Arab Emirates | Hard | Filip Prpic | 6–7 (5–7) , 1–
row 5 : Winner | 4 July 2010 | Futures | Manchester, Great Britain | Grass | Jamie Baker | 6–2, 7–6 (7–5)
row 6 : Winner | 30 August 2010 | Futures | Santander, Spain | Clay | Guillermo Olaso | 7–5, 6–4
row 7 : Winner | 22 April 2012 | Futures | Kaohsiung, Chinese Taipe | Hard | Hiroki Moriya | 7–5, 7–6 (7–3) [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What is the Date of the match against Guillermo Olaso?

Answer: 30 August 2010
[Table] header: Outcome | Date | Category | Tournament | Surface | Opponent | Score row 1 : Winner | 21 July 2008 | Futures | Irun, Spain | Clay | Pablo Martin-Adalia | 7–6 (7–1) , 7–
row 2 : Runner-up | 22 September 2008 | Futures | Martos, Spain | Hard | Roberto Bautista-Agut | 6–3, 3–6, 2–6
row 3 : Winner | 20 October 2008 | Futures | Rodez, France | Hard | Guillermo Alcaide | 6–3, 6–4
row 4 : Runner-up | 24 November 2008 | Futures | Dubai, United Arab Emirates | Hard | Filip Prpic | 6–7 (5–7) , 1–
row 5 : Winner | 4 July 2010 | Futures | Manchester, Great Britain | Grass | Jamie Baker | 6–2, 7–6 (7–5)
row 6 : Winner | 30 August 2010 | Futures | Santander, Spain | Clay | Guillermo Olaso | 7–5, 6–4
row 7 : Winner | 22 April 2012 | Futures | Kaohsiung, Chinese Taipe | Hard | Hiroki Moriya | 7–5, 7–6 (7–3) [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What is the Category of the Rodez, France Tournament?

Answer: Futures
[Table] header: Outcome | Date | Category | Tournament | Surface | Opponent | Score row 1 : Winner | 21 July 2008 | Futures | Irun, Spain | Clay | Pablo Martin-Adalia | 7–6 (7–1) , 7–
row 2 : Runner-up | 22 September 2008 | Futures | Martos, Spain | Hard | Roberto Bautista-Agut | 6–3, 3–6, 2–6
row 3 : Winner | 20 October 2008 | Futures | Rodez, France | Hard | Guillermo Alcaide | 6–3, 6–4
row 4 : Runner-up | 24 November 2008 | Futures | Dubai, United Arab Emirates | Hard | Filip Prpic | 6–7 (5–7) , 1–
row 5 : Winner | 4 July 2010 | Futures | Manchester, Great Britain | Grass | Jamie Baker | 6–2, 7–6 (7–5)
row 6 : Winner | 30 August 2010 | Futures | Santander, Spain | Clay | Guillermo Olaso | 7–5, 6–4
row 7 : Winner | 22 April 2012 | Futures | Kaohsiung, Chinese Taipe | Hard | Hiroki Moriya | 7–5, 7–6 (7–3) [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What is the Date of the Rodez, France Tournament?

Answer: 20 October 2008
[Table] header: Outcome | Date | Category | Tournament | Surface | Opponent | Score row 1 : Winner | 21 July 2008 | Futures | Irun, Spain | Clay | Pablo Martin-Adalia | 7–6 (7–1) , 7–
row 2 : Runner-up | 22 September 2008 | Futures | Martos, Spain | Hard | Roberto Bautista-Agut | 6–3, 3–6, 2–6
row 3 : Winner | 20 October 2008 | Futures | Rodez, France | Hard | Guillermo Alcaide | 6–3, 6–4
row 4 : Runner-up | 24 November 2008 | Futures | Dubai, United Arab Emirates | Hard | Filip Prpic | 6–7 (5–7) , 1–
row 5 : Winner | 4 July 2010 | Futures | Manchester, Great Britain | Grass | Jamie Baker | 6–2, 7–6 (7–5)
row 6 : Winner | 30 August 2010 | Futures | Santander, Spain | Clay | Guillermo Olaso | 7–5, 6–4
row 7 : Winner | 22 April 2012 | Futures | Kaohsiung, Chinese Taipe | Hard | Hiroki Moriya | 7–5, 7–6 (7–3) [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What is the Score of the tournament played on Clay Surface against Pablo Martin-Adalia?

Answer: 7–6 (7–1) , 7–
[Table] header: Year | Date | Home Team | Result | Visiting Team | Venue | Attendance row 1 : 1950 | October 1 | San Francisco 49ers | 14-35 | Los Angeles Rams | Kezar Stadium | 27,262
row 2 : 1950 | November 5 | Los Angeles Rams | 28-21 | San Francisco 49ers | Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum | 33,234
row 3 : 1951 | October 28 | San Francisco 49ers | 44-17 | Los Angeles Rams | Kezar Stadium | 49,538
row 4 : 1951 | November 4 | Los Angeles Rams | 23-16 | San Francisco 49ers | Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum | 54,346
row 5 : 1952 | November 23 | Los Angeles Rams | 35-9 | San Francisco 49ers | Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum | 77,698
row 6 : 1952 | November 30 | San Francisco 49ers | 21-34 | Los Angeles Rams | Kezar Stadium | 48,731
row 7 : 1953 | October 4 | San Francisco 49ers | 31-30 | Los Angeles Rams | Kezar Stadium | 43,922
row 8 : 1953 | November 8 | Los Angeles Rams | 27-31 | San Francisco 49ers | Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum | 85,865
row 9 : 1954 | October 3 | Los Angeles Rams | 24-24 | San Francisco 49ers | Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum | 93,621
row 10 : 1954 | November 7 | San Francisco 49ers | 34-42 | Los Angeles Rams | Kezar Stadium | 58,958
row 11 : 1955 | September 25 | San Francisco 49ers | 23-14 | Los Angeles Rams | Kezar Stadium | 60,100
row 12 : 1955 | November 6 | Los Angeles Rams | 27-14 | San Francisco 49ers | Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum | 85,302
row 13 : 1956 | October 7 | San Francisco 49ers | 33-30 | Los Angeles Rams | Kezar Stadium | 54,589
row 14 : 1956 | November 11 | Los Angeles Rams | 30-6 | San Francisco 49ers | Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum | 69,828
row 15 : 1957 | October 6 | San Francisco 49ers | 23-20 | Los Angeles Rams | Kezar Stadium | 59,637
row 16 : 1957 | November 10 | Los Angeles Rams | 37-24 | San Francisco 49ers | Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum | 102,368
row 17 : 1958 | October 5 | San Francisco 49ers | 3-33 | Los Angeles Rams | Kezar Stadium | 73,164
row 18 : 1958 | November 9 | Los Angeles Rams | 56-7 | San Francisco 49ers | Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum | 95,082
row 19 : 1959 | October 4 | San Francisco 49ers | 34-0 | Los Angeles Rams | Kezar Stadium | 56,028
row 20 : 1959 | November 8 | Los Angeles Rams | 16-24 | San Francisco 49ers | Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum | 94,376 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What was the venue in 1951 on November 4?

Answer: Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum
[Table] header: Year | Date | Home Team | Result | Visiting Team | Venue | Attendance row 1 : 1950 | October 1 | San Francisco 49ers | 14-35 | Los Angeles Rams | Kezar Stadium | 27,262
row 2 : 1950 | November 5 | Los Angeles Rams | 28-21 | San Francisco 49ers | Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum | 33,234
row 3 : 1951 | October 28 | San Francisco 49ers | 44-17 | Los Angeles Rams | Kezar Stadium | 49,538
row 4 : 1951 | November 4 | Los Angeles Rams | 23-16 | San Francisco 49ers | Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum | 54,346
row 5 : 1952 | November 23 | Los Angeles Rams | 35-9 | San Francisco 49ers | Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum | 77,698
row 6 : 1952 | November 30 | San Francisco 49ers | 21-34 | Los Angeles Rams | Kezar Stadium | 48,731
row 7 : 1953 | October 4 | San Francisco 49ers | 31-30 | Los Angeles Rams | Kezar Stadium | 43,922
row 8 : 1953 | November 8 | Los Angeles Rams | 27-31 | San Francisco 49ers | Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum | 85,865
row 9 : 1954 | October 3 | Los Angeles Rams | 24-24 | San Francisco 49ers | Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum | 93,621
row 10 : 1954 | November 7 | San Francisco 49ers | 34-42 | Los Angeles Rams | Kezar Stadium | 58,958
row 11 : 1955 | September 25 | San Francisco 49ers | 23-14 | Los Angeles Rams | Kezar Stadium | 60,100
row 12 : 1955 | November 6 | Los Angeles Rams | 27-14 | San Francisco 49ers | Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum | 85,302
row 13 : 1956 | October 7 | San Francisco 49ers | 33-30 | Los Angeles Rams | Kezar Stadium | 54,589
row 14 : 1956 | November 11 | Los Angeles Rams | 30-6 | San Francisco 49ers | Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum | 69,828
row 15 : 1957 | October 6 | San Francisco 49ers | 23-20 | Los Angeles Rams | Kezar Stadium | 59,637
row 16 : 1957 | November 10 | Los Angeles Rams | 37-24 | San Francisco 49ers | Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum | 102,368
row 17 : 1958 | October 5 | San Francisco 49ers | 3-33 | Los Angeles Rams | Kezar Stadium | 73,164
row 18 : 1958 | November 9 | Los Angeles Rams | 56-7 | San Francisco 49ers | Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum | 95,082
row 19 : 1959 | October 4 | San Francisco 49ers | 34-0 | Los Angeles Rams | Kezar Stadium | 56,028
row 20 : 1959 | November 8 | Los Angeles Rams | 16-24 | San Francisco 49ers | Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum | 94,376 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What is the latest year with a 34-0 result?

Answer: 1959.0
[Table] header: Year | Date | Home Team | Result | Visiting Team | Venue | Attendance row 1 : 1950 | October 1 | San Francisco 49ers | 14-35 | Los Angeles Rams | Kezar Stadium | 27,262
row 2 : 1950 | November 5 | Los Angeles Rams | 28-21 | San Francisco 49ers | Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum | 33,234
row 3 : 1951 | October 28 | San Francisco 49ers | 44-17 | Los Angeles Rams | Kezar Stadium | 49,538
row 4 : 1951 | November 4 | Los Angeles Rams | 23-16 | San Francisco 49ers | Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum | 54,346
row 5 : 1952 | November 23 | Los Angeles Rams | 35-9 | San Francisco 49ers | Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum | 77,698
row 6 : 1952 | November 30 | San Francisco 49ers | 21-34 | Los Angeles Rams | Kezar Stadium | 48,731
row 7 : 1953 | October 4 | San Francisco 49ers | 31-30 | Los Angeles Rams | Kezar Stadium | 43,922
row 8 : 1953 | November 8 | Los Angeles Rams | 27-31 | San Francisco 49ers | Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum | 85,865
row 9 : 1954 | October 3 | Los Angeles Rams | 24-24 | San Francisco 49ers | Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum | 93,621
row 10 : 1954 | November 7 | San Francisco 49ers | 34-42 | Los Angeles Rams | Kezar Stadium | 58,958
row 11 : 1955 | September 25 | San Francisco 49ers | 23-14 | Los Angeles Rams | Kezar Stadium | 60,100
row 12 : 1955 | November 6 | Los Angeles Rams | 27-14 | San Francisco 49ers | Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum | 85,302
row 13 : 1956 | October 7 | San Francisco 49ers | 33-30 | Los Angeles Rams | Kezar Stadium | 54,589
row 14 : 1956 | November 11 | Los Angeles Rams | 30-6 | San Francisco 49ers | Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum | 69,828
row 15 : 1957 | October 6 | San Francisco 49ers | 23-20 | Los Angeles Rams | Kezar Stadium | 59,637
row 16 : 1957 | November 10 | Los Angeles Rams | 37-24 | San Francisco 49ers | Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum | 102,368
row 17 : 1958 | October 5 | San Francisco 49ers | 3-33 | Los Angeles Rams | Kezar Stadium | 73,164
row 18 : 1958 | November 9 | Los Angeles Rams | 56-7 | San Francisco 49ers | Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum | 95,082
row 19 : 1959 | October 4 | San Francisco 49ers | 34-0 | Los Angeles Rams | Kezar Stadium | 56,028
row 20 : 1959 | November 8 | Los Angeles Rams | 16-24 | San Francisco 49ers | Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum | 94,376 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What year was the game at the Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum, with attendance more than 85,302, on November 9?

Answer: 1958.0
[Table] header: Year | Date | Home Team | Result | Visiting Team | Venue | Attendance row 1 : 1950 | October 1 | San Francisco 49ers | 14-35 | Los Angeles Rams | Kezar Stadium | 27,262
row 2 : 1950 | November 5 | Los Angeles Rams | 28-21 | San Francisco 49ers | Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum | 33,234
row 3 : 1951 | October 28 | San Francisco 49ers | 44-17 | Los Angeles Rams | Kezar Stadium | 49,538
row 4 : 1951 | November 4 | Los Angeles Rams | 23-16 | San Francisco 49ers | Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum | 54,346
row 5 : 1952 | November 23 | Los Angeles Rams | 35-9 | San Francisco 49ers | Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum | 77,698
row 6 : 1952 | November 30 | San Francisco 49ers | 21-34 | Los Angeles Rams | Kezar Stadium | 48,731
row 7 : 1953 | October 4 | San Francisco 49ers | 31-30 | Los Angeles Rams | Kezar Stadium | 43,922
row 8 : 1953 | November 8 | Los Angeles Rams | 27-31 | San Francisco 49ers | Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum | 85,865
row 9 : 1954 | October 3 | Los Angeles Rams | 24-24 | San Francisco 49ers | Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum | 93,621
row 10 : 1954 | November 7 | San Francisco 49ers | 34-42 | Los Angeles Rams | Kezar Stadium | 58,958
row 11 : 1955 | September 25 | San Francisco 49ers | 23-14 | Los Angeles Rams | Kezar Stadium | 60,100
row 12 : 1955 | November 6 | Los Angeles Rams | 27-14 | San Francisco 49ers | Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum | 85,302
row 13 : 1956 | October 7 | San Francisco 49ers | 33-30 | Los Angeles Rams | Kezar Stadium | 54,589
row 14 : 1956 | November 11 | Los Angeles Rams | 30-6 | San Francisco 49ers | Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum | 69,828
row 15 : 1957 | October 6 | San Francisco 49ers | 23-20 | Los Angeles Rams | Kezar Stadium | 59,637
row 16 : 1957 | November 10 | Los Angeles Rams | 37-24 | San Francisco 49ers | Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum | 102,368
row 17 : 1958 | October 5 | San Francisco 49ers | 3-33 | Los Angeles Rams | Kezar Stadium | 73,164
row 18 : 1958 | November 9 | Los Angeles Rams | 56-7 | San Francisco 49ers | Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum | 95,082
row 19 : 1959 | October 4 | San Francisco 49ers | 34-0 | Los Angeles Rams | Kezar Stadium | 56,028
row 20 : 1959 | November 8 | Los Angeles Rams | 16-24 | San Francisco 49ers | Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum | 94,376 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What date was the attendance more than 69,828, when the Los Angeles Rams were home team, later than 1955, with a result of 16-24?

Answer: November 8
[Table] header: Year | Date | Home Team | Result | Visiting Team | Venue | Attendance row 1 : 1950 | October 1 | San Francisco 49ers | 14-35 | Los Angeles Rams | Kezar Stadium | 27,262
row 2 : 1950 | November 5 | Los Angeles Rams | 28-21 | San Francisco 49ers | Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum | 33,234
row 3 : 1951 | October 28 | San Francisco 49ers | 44-17 | Los Angeles Rams | Kezar Stadium | 49,538
row 4 : 1951 | November 4 | Los Angeles Rams | 23-16 | San Francisco 49ers | Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum | 54,346
row 5 : 1952 | November 23 | Los Angeles Rams | 35-9 | San Francisco 49ers | Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum | 77,698
row 6 : 1952 | November 30 | San Francisco 49ers | 21-34 | Los Angeles Rams | Kezar Stadium | 48,731
row 7 : 1953 | October 4 | San Francisco 49ers | 31-30 | Los Angeles Rams | Kezar Stadium | 43,922
row 8 : 1953 | November 8 | Los Angeles Rams | 27-31 | San Francisco 49ers | Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum | 85,865
row 9 : 1954 | October 3 | Los Angeles Rams | 24-24 | San Francisco 49ers | Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum | 93,621
row 10 : 1954 | November 7 | San Francisco 49ers | 34-42 | Los Angeles Rams | Kezar Stadium | 58,958
row 11 : 1955 | September 25 | San Francisco 49ers | 23-14 | Los Angeles Rams | Kezar Stadium | 60,100
row 12 : 1955 | November 6 | Los Angeles Rams | 27-14 | San Francisco 49ers | Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum | 85,302
row 13 : 1956 | October 7 | San Francisco 49ers | 33-30 | Los Angeles Rams | Kezar Stadium | 54,589
row 14 : 1956 | November 11 | Los Angeles Rams | 30-6 | San Francisco 49ers | Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum | 69,828
row 15 : 1957 | October 6 | San Francisco 49ers | 23-20 | Los Angeles Rams | Kezar Stadium | 59,637
row 16 : 1957 | November 10 | Los Angeles Rams | 37-24 | San Francisco 49ers | Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum | 102,368
row 17 : 1958 | October 5 | San Francisco 49ers | 3-33 | Los Angeles Rams | Kezar Stadium | 73,164
row 18 : 1958 | November 9 | Los Angeles Rams | 56-7 | San Francisco 49ers | Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum | 95,082
row 19 : 1959 | October 4 | San Francisco 49ers | 34-0 | Los Angeles Rams | Kezar Stadium | 56,028
row 20 : 1959 | November 8 | Los Angeles Rams | 16-24 | San Francisco 49ers | Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum | 94,376 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What date was the visiting team of Los Angeles Rams, earlier than 1958?

Answer: October 1, October 28, November 30, October 4, November 7, September 25, October 7, October 6
[Table] header: Year | Date | Home Team | Result | Visiting Team | Venue | Attendance row 1 : 1950 | October 1 | San Francisco 49ers | 14-35 | Los Angeles Rams | Kezar Stadium | 27,262
row 2 : 1950 | November 5 | Los Angeles Rams | 28-21 | San Francisco 49ers | Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum | 33,234
row 3 : 1951 | October 28 | San Francisco 49ers | 44-17 | Los Angeles Rams | Kezar Stadium | 49,538
row 4 : 1951 | November 4 | Los Angeles Rams | 23-16 | San Francisco 49ers | Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum | 54,346
row 5 : 1952 | November 23 | Los Angeles Rams | 35-9 | San Francisco 49ers | Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum | 77,698
row 6 : 1952 | November 30 | San Francisco 49ers | 21-34 | Los Angeles Rams | Kezar Stadium | 48,731
row 7 : 1953 | October 4 | San Francisco 49ers | 31-30 | Los Angeles Rams | Kezar Stadium | 43,922
row 8 : 1953 | November 8 | Los Angeles Rams | 27-31 | San Francisco 49ers | Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum | 85,865
row 9 : 1954 | October 3 | Los Angeles Rams | 24-24 | San Francisco 49ers | Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum | 93,621
row 10 : 1954 | November 7 | San Francisco 49ers | 34-42 | Los Angeles Rams | Kezar Stadium | 58,958
row 11 : 1955 | September 25 | San Francisco 49ers | 23-14 | Los Angeles Rams | Kezar Stadium | 60,100
row 12 : 1955 | November 6 | Los Angeles Rams | 27-14 | San Francisco 49ers | Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum | 85,302
row 13 : 1956 | October 7 | San Francisco 49ers | 33-30 | Los Angeles Rams | Kezar Stadium | 54,589
row 14 : 1956 | November 11 | Los Angeles Rams | 30-6 | San Francisco 49ers | Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum | 69,828
row 15 : 1957 | October 6 | San Francisco 49ers | 23-20 | Los Angeles Rams | Kezar Stadium | 59,637
row 16 : 1957 | November 10 | Los Angeles Rams | 37-24 | San Francisco 49ers | Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum | 102,368
row 17 : 1958 | October 5 | San Francisco 49ers | 3-33 | Los Angeles Rams | Kezar Stadium | 73,164
row 18 : 1958 | November 9 | Los Angeles Rams | 56-7 | San Francisco 49ers | Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum | 95,082
row 19 : 1959 | October 4 | San Francisco 49ers | 34-0 | Los Angeles Rams | Kezar Stadium | 56,028
row 20 : 1959 | November 8 | Los Angeles Rams | 16-24 | San Francisco 49ers | Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum | 94,376 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What is the number in attendance at Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum?

Answer: 10.0
[Table] header: State | Status | Association Agreement | Membership Application | Candidate status | Negotiations start | Screening completed | Acquis Chapters open/closed row 1 : Albania | Applicant | 2009-04-01 ( SAA ) | 2009-04-28 | – | – | – | –
row 2 : Bosnia and Herzegovina | Potential candidate | Signed (SAA) | – | – | – | – | –
row 3 : Iceland | Negotiations Suspended | 1994-01-01 ( EEA ) | 2009-07-16 | 2010-06-17 | 2010-07-27 | 2011-06-21 | 27/11 of 33
row 4 : Kosovo | Potential candidate | Negotiating (SAA) | – | – | – | – | –
row 5 : Macedonia | Candidate | 2004-04-01 (SAA) | 2004-03-22 | 2005-12-17 | – | – | –
row 6 : Montenegro | Negotiating | 2010-05-01 (SAA) | 2008-12-15 | 2010-12-17 | 2012-06-29 | 2013-06-27 | 2/2 of 33
row 7 : Serbia | Candidate | 2013-09-01 (SAA) | 2009-12-22 | 2012-03-01 | (Jan 2014 at the latest) | (Started) | –
row 8 : Turkey | Negotiating | 1964-12-01 ( AA ) | 1987-04-14 | 1999-12-12 | 2005-10-03 | 2006-10-13 | 14/1 of 33 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: Which state has a 2010-05-01 (saa) association agreement?

Answer: Montenegro
[Table] header: State | Status | Association Agreement | Membership Application | Candidate status | Negotiations start | Screening completed | Acquis Chapters open/closed row 1 : Albania | Applicant | 2009-04-01 ( SAA ) | 2009-04-28 | – | – | – | –
row 2 : Bosnia and Herzegovina | Potential candidate | Signed (SAA) | – | – | – | – | –
row 3 : Iceland | Negotiations Suspended | 1994-01-01 ( EEA ) | 2009-07-16 | 2010-06-17 | 2010-07-27 | 2011-06-21 | 27/11 of 33
row 4 : Kosovo | Potential candidate | Negotiating (SAA) | – | – | – | – | –
row 5 : Macedonia | Candidate | 2004-04-01 (SAA) | 2004-03-22 | 2005-12-17 | – | – | –
row 6 : Montenegro | Negotiating | 2010-05-01 (SAA) | 2008-12-15 | 2010-12-17 | 2012-06-29 | 2013-06-27 | 2/2 of 33
row 7 : Serbia | Candidate | 2013-09-01 (SAA) | 2009-12-22 | 2012-03-01 | (Jan 2014 at the latest) | (Started) | –
row 8 : Turkey | Negotiating | 1964-12-01 ( AA ) | 1987-04-14 | 1999-12-12 | 2005-10-03 | 2006-10-13 | 14/1 of 33 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What is the acquis chapter open/closed dates with a membership application in 2009-04-28?

Answer: –