sail/symbolic-instruction-tuning huggingface dataset:
[Table] header: Channel | Video | Aspect | PSIP Short Name | Programming row 1 : 56.1 | 720p | 16:9 | KDOC-HD | Main KDOC-TV programming
row 2 : 56.2 | 480i | 4:3 | ESNE | Spanish Catholic
row 3 : 56.3 | 480i | 4:3 | METVLA | Me-TV
row 4 : 56.4 | 480i | 4:3 | NDOC | s Infomercial
row 5 : 56.5 | 480i | 4:3 | IBC-TV | IBC-TV (Vietname [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: Which Programming has an Aspect of 4:3 and a PSIP Short Name of metvla?

Answer: Me-TV
[Table] header: Channel | Video | Aspect | PSIP Short Name | Programming row 1 : 56.1 | 720p | 16:9 | KDOC-HD | Main KDOC-TV programming
row 2 : 56.2 | 480i | 4:3 | ESNE | Spanish Catholic
row 3 : 56.3 | 480i | 4:3 | METVLA | Me-TV
row 4 : 56.4 | 480i | 4:3 | NDOC | s Infomercial
row 5 : 56.5 | 480i | 4:3 | IBC-TV | IBC-TV (Vietname [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: Which Channel has an Aspect of 4:3 and a Programming of me-tv?

Answer: 56.3
[Table] header: Game | April | Opponent | Score | Record row 1 : 75 | 1 | @ Atlanta Flames | 6 - 0 | 29-33-13
row 2 : 76 | 2 | @ Boston Bruins | 8 - 3 | 29-34-13
row 3 : 77 | 5 | Atlanta Flames | 4 - 2 | 29-35-13
row 4 : 78 | 6 | @ Philadelphia Flyers | 3 - 0 | 29-36-13
row 5 : 79 | 8 | @ New York Islanders | 7 - 2 | 29-37-13
row 6 : 80 | 9 | Chicago Black Hawks | 3 - 2 | 30-37-13 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: Who is the opponent in a game higher than 76 on April 6?

Answer: @ Philadelphia Flyers
[Table] header: Game | April | Opponent | Score | Record row 1 : 75 | 1 | @ Atlanta Flames | 6 - 0 | 29-33-13
row 2 : 76 | 2 | @ Boston Bruins | 8 - 3 | 29-34-13
row 3 : 77 | 5 | Atlanta Flames | 4 - 2 | 29-35-13
row 4 : 78 | 6 | @ Philadelphia Flyers | 3 - 0 | 29-36-13
row 5 : 79 | 8 | @ New York Islanders | 7 - 2 | 29-37-13
row 6 : 80 | 9 | Chicago Black Hawks | 3 - 2 | 30-37-13 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What is the earliest April date with a game less than 76?

Answer: 1.0
[Table] header: Name | Company | Tracking Method | Latest stable release | Price in USD row 1 : Analyzer | AT Internet | Cookies via JavaScript | N/A | Negotiable
row 2 : Bango Mobile Web Analytics | Bango plc | Mobile ID and cookies | 4.0 | From $49/month
row 3 : ClickTale | ClickTale | Cookies via Javascript | N/A | Free / Negotiable
row 4 : Google Analytics | Google | Cookies via JavaScript | N/A | Free (Standard), $150,000 Annual
row 5 : Heap | Heap | Cookies via Javascript | N/A | Negotiable
row 6 : Insight | Omniture ( Adobe Systems ) | Cookies via JavaScript | N/A | Negotiable
row 7 : Mapmyuser.com | Mapmyuser, LLC | Cookies via JavaScript | N/A | Free
row 8 : Quantcast | Quantcast Corporation | Cookies via JavaScript | N/A | Free
row 9 : SiteCatalyst | Omniture ( Adobe Systems ) | Cookies via JavaScript | 15 | Negotiable
row 10 : StatCounter | StatCounter | Cookies via JavaScript | N/A | Free - $5/month ... $119
row 11 : Webtrekk Q3 | Webtrekk | Cookies via JavaScript | N/A | From $202/month
row 12 : Webtrends | Webtrends | Cookies via JavaScript | N/A | N/A
row 13 : Woopra | iFusion Labs LLC | Cookies via JavaScript | 1.2 | Free - $499.95+/month
row 14 : Yahoo! Web Analytics | Yahoo! | Cookies via JavaScript | Not available anymore | Free [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: Which Tracking Method has a Latest stable release of n/a, and a Price in USD of from $202/month?

Answer: Cookies via JavaScript
[Table] header: Name | Company | Tracking Method | Latest stable release | Price in USD row 1 : Analyzer | AT Internet | Cookies via JavaScript | N/A | Negotiable
row 2 : Bango Mobile Web Analytics | Bango plc | Mobile ID and cookies | 4.0 | From $49/month
row 3 : ClickTale | ClickTale | Cookies via Javascript | N/A | Free / Negotiable
row 4 : Google Analytics | Google | Cookies via JavaScript | N/A | Free (Standard), $150,000 Annual
row 5 : Heap | Heap | Cookies via Javascript | N/A | Negotiable
row 6 : Insight | Omniture ( Adobe Systems ) | Cookies via JavaScript | N/A | Negotiable
row 7 : Mapmyuser.com | Mapmyuser, LLC | Cookies via JavaScript | N/A | Free
row 8 : Quantcast | Quantcast Corporation | Cookies via JavaScript | N/A | Free
row 9 : SiteCatalyst | Omniture ( Adobe Systems ) | Cookies via JavaScript | 15 | Negotiable
row 10 : StatCounter | StatCounter | Cookies via JavaScript | N/A | Free - $5/month ... $119
row 11 : Webtrekk Q3 | Webtrekk | Cookies via JavaScript | N/A | From $202/month
row 12 : Webtrends | Webtrends | Cookies via JavaScript | N/A | N/A
row 13 : Woopra | iFusion Labs LLC | Cookies via JavaScript | 1.2 | Free - $499.95+/month
row 14 : Yahoo! Web Analytics | Yahoo! | Cookies via JavaScript | Not available anymore | Free [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: Which Name has a Company of quantcast corporation?

Answer: Quantcast
[Table] header: Name | Company | Tracking Method | Latest stable release | Price in USD row 1 : Analyzer | AT Internet | Cookies via JavaScript | N/A | Negotiable
row 2 : Bango Mobile Web Analytics | Bango plc | Mobile ID and cookies | 4.0 | From $49/month
row 3 : ClickTale | ClickTale | Cookies via Javascript | N/A | Free / Negotiable
row 4 : Google Analytics | Google | Cookies via JavaScript | N/A | Free (Standard), $150,000 Annual
row 5 : Heap | Heap | Cookies via Javascript | N/A | Negotiable
row 6 : Insight | Omniture ( Adobe Systems ) | Cookies via JavaScript | N/A | Negotiable
row 7 : Mapmyuser.com | Mapmyuser, LLC | Cookies via JavaScript | N/A | Free
row 8 : Quantcast | Quantcast Corporation | Cookies via JavaScript | N/A | Free
row 9 : SiteCatalyst | Omniture ( Adobe Systems ) | Cookies via JavaScript | 15 | Negotiable
row 10 : StatCounter | StatCounter | Cookies via JavaScript | N/A | Free - $5/month ... $119
row 11 : Webtrekk Q3 | Webtrekk | Cookies via JavaScript | N/A | From $202/month
row 12 : Webtrends | Webtrends | Cookies via JavaScript | N/A | N/A
row 13 : Woopra | iFusion Labs LLC | Cookies via JavaScript | 1.2 | Free - $499.95+/month
row 14 : Yahoo! Web Analytics | Yahoo! | Cookies via JavaScript | Not available anymore | Free [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: Name the Latest stable release that has a Price in USD of free / negotiable?

Answer: N/A
[Table] header: Name | Company | Tracking Method | Latest stable release | Price in USD row 1 : Analyzer | AT Internet | Cookies via JavaScript | N/A | Negotiable
row 2 : Bango Mobile Web Analytics | Bango plc | Mobile ID and cookies | 4.0 | From $49/month
row 3 : ClickTale | ClickTale | Cookies via Javascript | N/A | Free / Negotiable
row 4 : Google Analytics | Google | Cookies via JavaScript | N/A | Free (Standard), $150,000 Annual
row 5 : Heap | Heap | Cookies via Javascript | N/A | Negotiable
row 6 : Insight | Omniture ( Adobe Systems ) | Cookies via JavaScript | N/A | Negotiable
row 7 : Mapmyuser.com | Mapmyuser, LLC | Cookies via JavaScript | N/A | Free
row 8 : Quantcast | Quantcast Corporation | Cookies via JavaScript | N/A | Free
row 9 : SiteCatalyst | Omniture ( Adobe Systems ) | Cookies via JavaScript | 15 | Negotiable
row 10 : StatCounter | StatCounter | Cookies via JavaScript | N/A | Free - $5/month ... $119
row 11 : Webtrekk Q3 | Webtrekk | Cookies via JavaScript | N/A | From $202/month
row 12 : Webtrends | Webtrends | Cookies via JavaScript | N/A | N/A
row 13 : Woopra | iFusion Labs LLC | Cookies via JavaScript | 1.2 | Free - $499.95+/month
row 14 : Yahoo! Web Analytics | Yahoo! | Cookies via JavaScript | Not available anymore | Free [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: Name the Company which has a Price in USD of free / negotiable?

Answer: ClickTale
[Table] header: Name | Company | Tracking Method | Latest stable release | Price in USD row 1 : Analyzer | AT Internet | Cookies via JavaScript | N/A | Negotiable
row 2 : Bango Mobile Web Analytics | Bango plc | Mobile ID and cookies | 4.0 | From $49/month
row 3 : ClickTale | ClickTale | Cookies via Javascript | N/A | Free / Negotiable
row 4 : Google Analytics | Google | Cookies via JavaScript | N/A | Free (Standard), $150,000 Annual
row 5 : Heap | Heap | Cookies via Javascript | N/A | Negotiable
row 6 : Insight | Omniture ( Adobe Systems ) | Cookies via JavaScript | N/A | Negotiable
row 7 : Mapmyuser.com | Mapmyuser, LLC | Cookies via JavaScript | N/A | Free
row 8 : Quantcast | Quantcast Corporation | Cookies via JavaScript | N/A | Free
row 9 : SiteCatalyst | Omniture ( Adobe Systems ) | Cookies via JavaScript | 15 | Negotiable
row 10 : StatCounter | StatCounter | Cookies via JavaScript | N/A | Free - $5/month ... $119
row 11 : Webtrekk Q3 | Webtrekk | Cookies via JavaScript | N/A | From $202/month
row 12 : Webtrends | Webtrends | Cookies via JavaScript | N/A | N/A
row 13 : Woopra | iFusion Labs LLC | Cookies via JavaScript | 1.2 | Free - $499.95+/month
row 14 : Yahoo! Web Analytics | Yahoo! | Cookies via JavaScript | Not available anymore | Free [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: Name the Company which has a Tracking Method of cookies via javascript, and a Latest stable release of n/a, and a Name of clicktale?

Answer: ClickTale
[Table] header: Name | Company | Tracking Method | Latest stable release | Price in USD row 1 : Analyzer | AT Internet | Cookies via JavaScript | N/A | Negotiable
row 2 : Bango Mobile Web Analytics | Bango plc | Mobile ID and cookies | 4.0 | From $49/month
row 3 : ClickTale | ClickTale | Cookies via Javascript | N/A | Free / Negotiable
row 4 : Google Analytics | Google | Cookies via JavaScript | N/A | Free (Standard), $150,000 Annual
row 5 : Heap | Heap | Cookies via Javascript | N/A | Negotiable
row 6 : Insight | Omniture ( Adobe Systems ) | Cookies via JavaScript | N/A | Negotiable
row 7 : Mapmyuser.com | Mapmyuser, LLC | Cookies via JavaScript | N/A | Free
row 8 : Quantcast | Quantcast Corporation | Cookies via JavaScript | N/A | Free
row 9 : SiteCatalyst | Omniture ( Adobe Systems ) | Cookies via JavaScript | 15 | Negotiable
row 10 : StatCounter | StatCounter | Cookies via JavaScript | N/A | Free - $5/month ... $119
row 11 : Webtrekk Q3 | Webtrekk | Cookies via JavaScript | N/A | From $202/month
row 12 : Webtrends | Webtrends | Cookies via JavaScript | N/A | N/A
row 13 : Woopra | iFusion Labs LLC | Cookies via JavaScript | 1.2 | Free - $499.95+/month
row 14 : Yahoo! Web Analytics | Yahoo! | Cookies via JavaScript | Not available anymore | Free [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: Name the Tracking Method which has a Company of mapmyuser, llc?

Answer: Cookies via JavaScript
[Table] header: Tie no | Home team | Score | Away team | Attendance row 1 : 1 | Bristol City | 0–1 | Everton | 29 January 1995
row 2 : 2 | Burnley | 0–0 | Liverpool | 20,551
row 3 : Replay | Liverpool | 1–0 | Burnley | 32,109
row 4 : 3 | Watford | 1–0 | Swindon Town | 28 January 1995
row 5 : 4 | Nottingham Forest | 1–2 | Crystal Palace | 28 January 1995
row 6 : 5 | Sheffield Wednesday | 0–0 | Wolverhampton Wanderers | 30 January 1995
row 7 : Replay | Wolverhampton Wanderers | 1–1 | Sheffield Wednesday | 8 February 1995
row 8 : Wolverhampton Wanderers won 4– | Wolverhampton Wanderers won 4– | Wolverhampton Wanderers won 4– | Wolverhampton Wanderers won 4– | Wolverhampton Wanderers won 4–
row 9 : 6 | Sunderland | 1–4 | Tottenham Hotspur | 29 January 1995
row 10 : 7 | Luton Town | 1–1 | Southampton | 28 January 1995
row 11 : Replay | Southampton | 6–0 | Luton Town | 8 February 1995
row 12 : 8 | Tranmere Rovers | 0–2 | Wimbledon | 29 January 1995
row 13 : 9 | Newcastle United | 3–0 | Swansea City | 28 January 1995
row 14 : 10 | Manchester City | 1–0 | Aston Villa | 28 January 1995
row 15 : 11 | Queens Park Rangers | 1–0 | West Ham United | 28 January 1995
row 16 : 12 | Coventry City | 0–0 | Norwich City | 28 January 1995
row 17 : Replay | Norwich City | 3–1 | Coventry City | 8 February 1995
row 18 : 13 | Portsmouth | 0–1 | Leicester City | 28 January 1995
row 19 : 14 | Manchester United | 5–2 | Wrexham | 28 January 1995
row 20 : 15 | Millwall | 0–0 | Chelsea | 28 January 1995
row 21 : Replay | Chelsea | 1–1 | Millwall | 8 February 1995
row 22 : Millwall won 5–4 on penalties | Millwall won 5–4 on penalties | Millwall won 5–4 on penalties | Millwall won 5–4 on penalties | Millwall won 5–4 on penalties
row 23 : 16 | Leeds United | 3–2 | Oldham Athletic | 28 January 1995 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What was the tie number of the game when the queens park rangers were the home team?

Answer: 11.0
[Table] header: Tie no | Home team | Score | Away team | Attendance row 1 : 1 | Bristol City | 0–1 | Everton | 29 January 1995
row 2 : 2 | Burnley | 0–0 | Liverpool | 20,551
row 3 : Replay | Liverpool | 1–0 | Burnley | 32,109
row 4 : 3 | Watford | 1–0 | Swindon Town | 28 January 1995
row 5 : 4 | Nottingham Forest | 1–2 | Crystal Palace | 28 January 1995
row 6 : 5 | Sheffield Wednesday | 0–0 | Wolverhampton Wanderers | 30 January 1995
row 7 : Replay | Wolverhampton Wanderers | 1–1 | Sheffield Wednesday | 8 February 1995
row 8 : Wolverhampton Wanderers won 4– | Wolverhampton Wanderers won 4– | Wolverhampton Wanderers won 4– | Wolverhampton Wanderers won 4– | Wolverhampton Wanderers won 4–
row 9 : 6 | Sunderland | 1–4 | Tottenham Hotspur | 29 January 1995
row 10 : 7 | Luton Town | 1–1 | Southampton | 28 January 1995
row 11 : Replay | Southampton | 6–0 | Luton Town | 8 February 1995
row 12 : 8 | Tranmere Rovers | 0–2 | Wimbledon | 29 January 1995
row 13 : 9 | Newcastle United | 3–0 | Swansea City | 28 January 1995
row 14 : 10 | Manchester City | 1–0 | Aston Villa | 28 January 1995
row 15 : 11 | Queens Park Rangers | 1–0 | West Ham United | 28 January 1995
row 16 : 12 | Coventry City | 0–0 | Norwich City | 28 January 1995
row 17 : Replay | Norwich City | 3–1 | Coventry City | 8 February 1995
row 18 : 13 | Portsmouth | 0–1 | Leicester City | 28 January 1995
row 19 : 14 | Manchester United | 5–2 | Wrexham | 28 January 1995
row 20 : 15 | Millwall | 0–0 | Chelsea | 28 January 1995
row 21 : Replay | Chelsea | 1–1 | Millwall | 8 February 1995
row 22 : Millwall won 5–4 on penalties | Millwall won 5–4 on penalties | Millwall won 5–4 on penalties | Millwall won 5–4 on penalties | Millwall won 5–4 on penalties
row 23 : 16 | Leeds United | 3–2 | Oldham Athletic | 28 January 1995 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What was the tie number when the away team was Wrexham?

Answer: 14.0
[Table] header: Name | Date | Defending forces | Brigade | Population row 1 : Al-Ashrafiy | 10 May 1948 | villagers fled | Golani brigade | 230
row 2 : Farwana | 10 May 1948 | villagers fled 'to Transjordan' | Golani brigade | 330
row 3 : Baysan | 12 May 1948 | Arab Liberation Army 'contingents | Golani brigade | 5,180 inc. 430 Christians
row 4 : Al-Sakhina | 12 May 1948 | n/a | Golani brigade | 820 inc. 290 Jews
row 5 : Al-Hamidiyya | 12 May 1948 | n/a | Golani brigade | 320 inc. 100 Jews
row 6 : Sirin | 12 May 1948 | n/a | Golani | 810
row 7 : Al-Ghazzawiyya | 20 May 1948 | n/a | Golani brigade 4th batt | 1,640 inc. 620 Jews
row 8 : Al-Fatur | 20 May 1948 | n/a | n/a | 110
row 9 : 'Arab al-Safa | 20 May 1948 | n/a | Golani brigade | 650
row 10 : Kawkab al-Hawa | 21 May 1948 | n/a | Golani brigade 3rd bat | 300
row 11 : Al-Samiriyya | 27 May 1948 | n/a | Golani brigade 4th batt | 250
row 12 : Danna | 28 May 1948 | n/a | Golani brigade | 190 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: Which brigade has a population of 190?

Answer: Golani brigade
[Table] header: Name | Date | Defending forces | Brigade | Population row 1 : Al-Ashrafiy | 10 May 1948 | villagers fled | Golani brigade | 230
row 2 : Farwana | 10 May 1948 | villagers fled 'to Transjordan' | Golani brigade | 330
row 3 : Baysan | 12 May 1948 | Arab Liberation Army 'contingents | Golani brigade | 5,180 inc. 430 Christians
row 4 : Al-Sakhina | 12 May 1948 | n/a | Golani brigade | 820 inc. 290 Jews
row 5 : Al-Hamidiyya | 12 May 1948 | n/a | Golani brigade | 320 inc. 100 Jews
row 6 : Sirin | 12 May 1948 | n/a | Golani | 810
row 7 : Al-Ghazzawiyya | 20 May 1948 | n/a | Golani brigade 4th batt | 1,640 inc. 620 Jews
row 8 : Al-Fatur | 20 May 1948 | n/a | n/a | 110
row 9 : 'Arab al-Safa | 20 May 1948 | n/a | Golani brigade | 650
row 10 : Kawkab al-Hawa | 21 May 1948 | n/a | Golani brigade 3rd bat | 300
row 11 : Al-Samiriyya | 27 May 1948 | n/a | Golani brigade 4th batt | 250
row 12 : Danna | 28 May 1948 | n/a | Golani brigade | 190 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What defending forces have a population of 650?

Answer: n/a
[Table] header: Name | Date | Defending forces | Brigade | Population row 1 : Al-Ashrafiy | 10 May 1948 | villagers fled | Golani brigade | 230
row 2 : Farwana | 10 May 1948 | villagers fled 'to Transjordan' | Golani brigade | 330
row 3 : Baysan | 12 May 1948 | Arab Liberation Army 'contingents | Golani brigade | 5,180 inc. 430 Christians
row 4 : Al-Sakhina | 12 May 1948 | n/a | Golani brigade | 820 inc. 290 Jews
row 5 : Al-Hamidiyya | 12 May 1948 | n/a | Golani brigade | 320 inc. 100 Jews
row 6 : Sirin | 12 May 1948 | n/a | Golani | 810
row 7 : Al-Ghazzawiyya | 20 May 1948 | n/a | Golani brigade 4th batt | 1,640 inc. 620 Jews
row 8 : Al-Fatur | 20 May 1948 | n/a | n/a | 110
row 9 : 'Arab al-Safa | 20 May 1948 | n/a | Golani brigade | 650
row 10 : Kawkab al-Hawa | 21 May 1948 | n/a | Golani brigade 3rd bat | 300
row 11 : Al-Samiriyya | 27 May 1948 | n/a | Golani brigade 4th batt | 250
row 12 : Danna | 28 May 1948 | n/a | Golani brigade | 190 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: Which defending forces have the name Danna?

Answer: n/a
[Table] header: Name | Date | Defending forces | Brigade | Population row 1 : Al-Ashrafiy | 10 May 1948 | villagers fled | Golani brigade | 230
row 2 : Farwana | 10 May 1948 | villagers fled 'to Transjordan' | Golani brigade | 330
row 3 : Baysan | 12 May 1948 | Arab Liberation Army 'contingents | Golani brigade | 5,180 inc. 430 Christians
row 4 : Al-Sakhina | 12 May 1948 | n/a | Golani brigade | 820 inc. 290 Jews
row 5 : Al-Hamidiyya | 12 May 1948 | n/a | Golani brigade | 320 inc. 100 Jews
row 6 : Sirin | 12 May 1948 | n/a | Golani | 810
row 7 : Al-Ghazzawiyya | 20 May 1948 | n/a | Golani brigade 4th batt | 1,640 inc. 620 Jews
row 8 : Al-Fatur | 20 May 1948 | n/a | n/a | 110
row 9 : 'Arab al-Safa | 20 May 1948 | n/a | Golani brigade | 650
row 10 : Kawkab al-Hawa | 21 May 1948 | n/a | Golani brigade 3rd bat | 300
row 11 : Al-Samiriyya | 27 May 1948 | n/a | Golani brigade 4th batt | 250
row 12 : Danna | 28 May 1948 | n/a | Golani brigade | 190 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What name has a population of 810?

Answer: Sirin
[Table] header: Name | Date | Defending forces | Brigade | Population row 1 : Al-Ashrafiy | 10 May 1948 | villagers fled | Golani brigade | 230
row 2 : Farwana | 10 May 1948 | villagers fled 'to Transjordan' | Golani brigade | 330
row 3 : Baysan | 12 May 1948 | Arab Liberation Army 'contingents | Golani brigade | 5,180 inc. 430 Christians
row 4 : Al-Sakhina | 12 May 1948 | n/a | Golani brigade | 820 inc. 290 Jews
row 5 : Al-Hamidiyya | 12 May 1948 | n/a | Golani brigade | 320 inc. 100 Jews
row 6 : Sirin | 12 May 1948 | n/a | Golani | 810
row 7 : Al-Ghazzawiyya | 20 May 1948 | n/a | Golani brigade 4th batt | 1,640 inc. 620 Jews
row 8 : Al-Fatur | 20 May 1948 | n/a | n/a | 110
row 9 : 'Arab al-Safa | 20 May 1948 | n/a | Golani brigade | 650
row 10 : Kawkab al-Hawa | 21 May 1948 | n/a | Golani brigade 3rd bat | 300
row 11 : Al-Samiriyya | 27 May 1948 | n/a | Golani brigade 4th batt | 250
row 12 : Danna | 28 May 1948 | n/a | Golani brigade | 190 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: Which defending forces has a population of 230?

Answer: villagers fled
[Table] header: Date | Label | Region | Format | Catalog row 1 : Early July 2008 | Polydor | Belgium, Switzerland | Digital | —
row 2 : 19 July 2008 | Polydor | France | Digital | —
row 3 : 18 August 2008 | Polydor | Belgium, France, Switzerland | CD maxi | 5310110
row 4 : 18 August 2008 | Polydor | Belgium, France, Switzerland | 12" | 5310111
row 5 : 18 August 2008 | Polydor | Belgium, France, Switzerland | CD single | 5310112 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: In what region was Degeneration released in digital format on 19 July 2008?

Answer: France
[Table] header: Date | Label | Region | Format | Catalog row 1 : Early July 2008 | Polydor | Belgium, Switzerland | Digital | —
row 2 : 19 July 2008 | Polydor | France | Digital | —
row 3 : 18 August 2008 | Polydor | Belgium, France, Switzerland | CD maxi | 5310110
row 4 : 18 August 2008 | Polydor | Belgium, France, Switzerland | 12" | 5310111
row 5 : 18 August 2008 | Polydor | Belgium, France, Switzerland | CD single | 5310112 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What was the name of the catalog released on 19 July 2008?

Answer: —
[Table] header: Tournament | Surface | Week | Winner and score | Finalist | Semifinalists row 1 : Indian Wells | Hard | March 4 | Jim Courier (16) 4–6, 6– | Guy Forget (3) | Stefan Edberg (1) Michael Stich (11)
row 2 : Key Biscane | Hard | March 11 | Jim Courier (13) 4–6, 6– | David Wheaton | Stefan Edberg (1) Richey Reneberg
row 3 : Monte Carlo | Clay | April 22 | Sergi Bruguera 5–7, 6 | Boris Becker | Horst Skoff Goran Prpi
row 4 : Hamburg | Clay | May 6 | Karel Nováček 6– | Magnus Gustafsson | Michael Stich Goran Prpić
row 5 : Rome | Clay | May 13 | Emilio Sánchez 6–3, 6 | Alberto Mancini | Goran Prpić Sergi Bruguer
row 6 : Montréal | Hard | July 22 | Andrei Chesnokov 3–6, 6 | Petr Korda | Ivan Lendl Jim Courier
row 7 : Cincinnati | Hard | August 5 | Guy Forget 2–6, 7–6(4) | Pete Sampras | Boris Becker Jim Courier
row 8 : Stockholm | Carpet (i) | October 21 | Boris Becker 3–6, 6–4, | Stefan Edberg | Aaron Krickstein Jim Courier
row 9 : Paris | Carpet (i) | October 28 | Guy Forget 7–6(9), 4 | Pete Sampras | Michael Chang Jonas Svensson [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: Who are the semifinalists of the tournament with magnus gustafsson as the finalist?

Answer: Michael Stich Goran Prpić
[Table] header: Tournament | Surface | Week | Winner and score | Finalist | Semifinalists row 1 : Indian Wells | Hard | March 4 | Jim Courier (16) 4–6, 6– | Guy Forget (3) | Stefan Edberg (1) Michael Stich (11)
row 2 : Key Biscane | Hard | March 11 | Jim Courier (13) 4–6, 6– | David Wheaton | Stefan Edberg (1) Richey Reneberg
row 3 : Monte Carlo | Clay | April 22 | Sergi Bruguera 5–7, 6 | Boris Becker | Horst Skoff Goran Prpi
row 4 : Hamburg | Clay | May 6 | Karel Nováček 6– | Magnus Gustafsson | Michael Stich Goran Prpić
row 5 : Rome | Clay | May 13 | Emilio Sánchez 6–3, 6 | Alberto Mancini | Goran Prpić Sergi Bruguer
row 6 : Montréal | Hard | July 22 | Andrei Chesnokov 3–6, 6 | Petr Korda | Ivan Lendl Jim Courier
row 7 : Cincinnati | Hard | August 5 | Guy Forget 2–6, 7–6(4) | Pete Sampras | Boris Becker Jim Courier
row 8 : Stockholm | Carpet (i) | October 21 | Boris Becker 3–6, 6–4, | Stefan Edberg | Aaron Krickstein Jim Courier
row 9 : Paris | Carpet (i) | October 28 | Guy Forget 7–6(9), 4 | Pete Sampras | Michael Chang Jonas Svensson [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: Who is the winner and score of the tournament with semifinalists goran prpić sergi bruguera?

Answer: none
[Table] header: Tournament | Surface | Week | Winner and score | Finalist | Semifinalists row 1 : Indian Wells | Hard | March 4 | Jim Courier (16) 4–6, 6– | Guy Forget (3) | Stefan Edberg (1) Michael Stich (11)
row 2 : Key Biscane | Hard | March 11 | Jim Courier (13) 4–6, 6– | David Wheaton | Stefan Edberg (1) Richey Reneberg
row 3 : Monte Carlo | Clay | April 22 | Sergi Bruguera 5–7, 6 | Boris Becker | Horst Skoff Goran Prpi
row 4 : Hamburg | Clay | May 6 | Karel Nováček 6– | Magnus Gustafsson | Michael Stich Goran Prpić
row 5 : Rome | Clay | May 13 | Emilio Sánchez 6–3, 6 | Alberto Mancini | Goran Prpić Sergi Bruguer
row 6 : Montréal | Hard | July 22 | Andrei Chesnokov 3–6, 6 | Petr Korda | Ivan Lendl Jim Courier
row 7 : Cincinnati | Hard | August 5 | Guy Forget 2–6, 7–6(4) | Pete Sampras | Boris Becker Jim Courier
row 8 : Stockholm | Carpet (i) | October 21 | Boris Becker 3–6, 6–4, | Stefan Edberg | Aaron Krickstein Jim Courier
row 9 : Paris | Carpet (i) | October 28 | Guy Forget 7–6(9), 4 | Pete Sampras | Michael Chang Jonas Svensson [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: Who is the winner and score during the week of April 22?

Answer: Sergi Bruguera 5–7, 6
[Table] header: Tournament | Surface | Week | Winner and score | Finalist | Semifinalists row 1 : Indian Wells | Hard | March 4 | Jim Courier (16) 4–6, 6– | Guy Forget (3) | Stefan Edberg (1) Michael Stich (11)
row 2 : Key Biscane | Hard | March 11 | Jim Courier (13) 4–6, 6– | David Wheaton | Stefan Edberg (1) Richey Reneberg
row 3 : Monte Carlo | Clay | April 22 | Sergi Bruguera 5–7, 6 | Boris Becker | Horst Skoff Goran Prpi
row 4 : Hamburg | Clay | May 6 | Karel Nováček 6– | Magnus Gustafsson | Michael Stich Goran Prpić
row 5 : Rome | Clay | May 13 | Emilio Sánchez 6–3, 6 | Alberto Mancini | Goran Prpić Sergi Bruguer
row 6 : Montréal | Hard | July 22 | Andrei Chesnokov 3–6, 6 | Petr Korda | Ivan Lendl Jim Courier
row 7 : Cincinnati | Hard | August 5 | Guy Forget 2–6, 7–6(4) | Pete Sampras | Boris Becker Jim Courier
row 8 : Stockholm | Carpet (i) | October 21 | Boris Becker 3–6, 6–4, | Stefan Edberg | Aaron Krickstein Jim Courier
row 9 : Paris | Carpet (i) | October 28 | Guy Forget 7–6(9), 4 | Pete Sampras | Michael Chang Jonas Svensson [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What week was the tournament of paris?

Answer: October 28
[Table] header: Player | Position | League | Copa del Rey | Champions League | Total row 1 : Gonzalo Higuaín | Forward | 8 | 0 | 0 | 8
row 2 : Guti | Midfielder | 5 | 1 | 2 | 8
row 3 : Arjen Robben | Forward | 6 | 0 | 1 | 7
row 4 : Raúl | Forward | 5 | 1 | 0 | 6
row 5 : Fernando Gago | Midfielder | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6
row 6 : Rafael van der Vaart | Midfielder | 4 | 0 | 1 | 5 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What is the average Champions League assists for the players with League assists under 4?

Answer: none
[Table] header: Player | Position | League | Copa del Rey | Champions League | Total row 1 : Gonzalo Higuaín | Forward | 8 | 0 | 0 | 8
row 2 : Guti | Midfielder | 5 | 1 | 2 | 8
row 3 : Arjen Robben | Forward | 6 | 0 | 1 | 7
row 4 : Raúl | Forward | 5 | 1 | 0 | 6
row 5 : Fernando Gago | Midfielder | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6
row 6 : Rafael van der Vaart | Midfielder | 4 | 0 | 1 | 5 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What is the most Champions League assists for those with a total of 6 and position of Midfielder?

Answer: 0.0
[Table] header: Player | PL Apps | PL G | CL Apps | CL G | FAC / LC Apps | FAC / LC G | Total Apps | Total G | FA YC | UEFA YC row 1 : Gerrard | 31 | 16 | 10 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 44 | 24 | 5 | 1
row 2 : Torres | 24 | 14 | 9 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 38 | 17 | 2 | 1
row 3 : Kuyt | 38 | 12 | 11 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 51 | 15 | 0 | 0
row 4 : Benayoun | 32 | 8 | 9 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 42 | 9 | 0 | 1
row 5 : Keane | 19 | 5 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 28 | 7 | 2 | 0
row 6 : Riera | 28 | 3 | 9 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 40 | 5 | 1 | 3
row 7 : Alonso | 33 | 3 | 10 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 47 | 4 | 7 | 1
row 8 : Babel | 27 | 3 | 10 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 42 | 4 | 3 | 0
row 9 : Aurélio | 24 | 2 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 33 | 3 | 0 | 2
row 10 : N'Gog | 14 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 19 | 3 | 1 | 0
row 11 : Dossena | 16 | 1 | 7 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 26 | 2 | 2 | 2
row 12 : Agger | 18 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 26 | 2 | 4 | 2
row 13 : Hyypiä | 16 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 19 | 2 | 1 | 0
row 14 : Lucas | 25 | 1 | 10 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 39 | 3 | 4 | 1
row 15 : Arbeloa | 29 | 1 | 12 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 43 | 1 | 8 | 3
row 16 : Plessis | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0
row 17 : Carragher | 38 | 0 | 12 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 54 | 0 | 5 | 0
row 18 : Mascherano | 27 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 38 | 0 | 6 | 3
row 19 : Škrtel | 21 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 30 | 0 | 4 | 1
row 20 : El Zhar | 15 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 19 | 0 | 3 | 0
row 21 : Insúa | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0
row 22 : Pennant | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0
row 23 : Spearing | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0
row 24 : Darby | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0
row 25 : Degen | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0
row 26 : Kelly | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0
row 27 : Voronin | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What is the sum of the FAC/LC G with a CL G less than 2, less than 5 total apps, and a UEFA YC greater than 0?

Answer: none
[Table] header: Player | PL Apps | PL G | CL Apps | CL G | FAC / LC Apps | FAC / LC G | Total Apps | Total G | FA YC | UEFA YC row 1 : Gerrard | 31 | 16 | 10 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 44 | 24 | 5 | 1
row 2 : Torres | 24 | 14 | 9 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 38 | 17 | 2 | 1
row 3 : Kuyt | 38 | 12 | 11 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 51 | 15 | 0 | 0
row 4 : Benayoun | 32 | 8 | 9 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 42 | 9 | 0 | 1
row 5 : Keane | 19 | 5 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 28 | 7 | 2 | 0
row 6 : Riera | 28 | 3 | 9 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 40 | 5 | 1 | 3
row 7 : Alonso | 33 | 3 | 10 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 47 | 4 | 7 | 1
row 8 : Babel | 27 | 3 | 10 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 42 | 4 | 3 | 0
row 9 : Aurélio | 24 | 2 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 33 | 3 | 0 | 2
row 10 : N'Gog | 14 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 19 | 3 | 1 | 0
row 11 : Dossena | 16 | 1 | 7 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 26 | 2 | 2 | 2
row 12 : Agger | 18 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 26 | 2 | 4 | 2
row 13 : Hyypiä | 16 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 19 | 2 | 1 | 0
row 14 : Lucas | 25 | 1 | 10 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 39 | 3 | 4 | 1
row 15 : Arbeloa | 29 | 1 | 12 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 43 | 1 | 8 | 3
row 16 : Plessis | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0
row 17 : Carragher | 38 | 0 | 12 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 54 | 0 | 5 | 0
row 18 : Mascherano | 27 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 38 | 0 | 6 | 3
row 19 : Škrtel | 21 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 30 | 0 | 4 | 1
row 20 : El Zhar | 15 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 19 | 0 | 3 | 0
row 21 : Insúa | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0
row 22 : Pennant | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0
row 23 : Spearing | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0
row 24 : Darby | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0
row 25 : Degen | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0
row 26 : Kelly | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0
row 27 : Voronin | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What is the average FAC/LC apps with a CL G greater than 0, less than 33 PL apps, a FAC/LC G of 0, and less than 2 FA YC?

Answer: 1.3333333333333333
[Table] header: Player | PL Apps | PL G | CL Apps | CL G | FAC / LC Apps | FAC / LC G | Total Apps | Total G | FA YC | UEFA YC row 1 : Gerrard | 31 | 16 | 10 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 44 | 24 | 5 | 1
row 2 : Torres | 24 | 14 | 9 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 38 | 17 | 2 | 1
row 3 : Kuyt | 38 | 12 | 11 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 51 | 15 | 0 | 0
row 4 : Benayoun | 32 | 8 | 9 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 42 | 9 | 0 | 1
row 5 : Keane | 19 | 5 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 28 | 7 | 2 | 0
row 6 : Riera | 28 | 3 | 9 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 40 | 5 | 1 | 3
row 7 : Alonso | 33 | 3 | 10 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 47 | 4 | 7 | 1
row 8 : Babel | 27 | 3 | 10 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 42 | 4 | 3 | 0
row 9 : Aurélio | 24 | 2 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 33 | 3 | 0 | 2
row 10 : N'Gog | 14 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 19 | 3 | 1 | 0
row 11 : Dossena | 16 | 1 | 7 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 26 | 2 | 2 | 2
row 12 : Agger | 18 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 26 | 2 | 4 | 2
row 13 : Hyypiä | 16 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 19 | 2 | 1 | 0
row 14 : Lucas | 25 | 1 | 10 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 39 | 3 | 4 | 1
row 15 : Arbeloa | 29 | 1 | 12 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 43 | 1 | 8 | 3
row 16 : Plessis | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0
row 17 : Carragher | 38 | 0 | 12 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 54 | 0 | 5 | 0
row 18 : Mascherano | 27 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 38 | 0 | 6 | 3
row 19 : Škrtel | 21 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 30 | 0 | 4 | 1
row 20 : El Zhar | 15 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 19 | 0 | 3 | 0
row 21 : Insúa | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0
row 22 : Pennant | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0
row 23 : Spearing | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0
row 24 : Darby | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0
row 25 : Degen | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0
row 26 : Kelly | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0
row 27 : Voronin | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What is the sum of the FAC/LC apps with less than 25 PC apps and a UEFA YC less than 0?

Answer: none
[Table] header: Player | PL Apps | PL G | CL Apps | CL G | FAC / LC Apps | FAC / LC G | Total Apps | Total G | FA YC | UEFA YC row 1 : Gerrard | 31 | 16 | 10 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 44 | 24 | 5 | 1
row 2 : Torres | 24 | 14 | 9 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 38 | 17 | 2 | 1
row 3 : Kuyt | 38 | 12 | 11 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 51 | 15 | 0 | 0
row 4 : Benayoun | 32 | 8 | 9 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 42 | 9 | 0 | 1
row 5 : Keane | 19 | 5 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 28 | 7 | 2 | 0
row 6 : Riera | 28 | 3 | 9 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 40 | 5 | 1 | 3
row 7 : Alonso | 33 | 3 | 10 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 47 | 4 | 7 | 1
row 8 : Babel | 27 | 3 | 10 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 42 | 4 | 3 | 0
row 9 : Aurélio | 24 | 2 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 33 | 3 | 0 | 2
row 10 : N'Gog | 14 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 19 | 3 | 1 | 0
row 11 : Dossena | 16 | 1 | 7 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 26 | 2 | 2 | 2
row 12 : Agger | 18 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 26 | 2 | 4 | 2
row 13 : Hyypiä | 16 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 19 | 2 | 1 | 0
row 14 : Lucas | 25 | 1 | 10 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 39 | 3 | 4 | 1
row 15 : Arbeloa | 29 | 1 | 12 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 43 | 1 | 8 | 3
row 16 : Plessis | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0
row 17 : Carragher | 38 | 0 | 12 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 54 | 0 | 5 | 0
row 18 : Mascherano | 27 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 38 | 0 | 6 | 3
row 19 : Škrtel | 21 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 30 | 0 | 4 | 1
row 20 : El Zhar | 15 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 19 | 0 | 3 | 0
row 21 : Insúa | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0
row 22 : Pennant | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0
row 23 : Spearing | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0
row 24 : Darby | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0
row 25 : Degen | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0
row 26 : Kelly | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0
row 27 : Voronin | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What is the sum of the total apps of player benayoun, who has a PL G greater than 0 and more than 9 CL apps?

Answer: none
[Table] header: Player | PL Apps | PL G | CL Apps | CL G | FAC / LC Apps | FAC / LC G | Total Apps | Total G | FA YC | UEFA YC row 1 : Gerrard | 31 | 16 | 10 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 44 | 24 | 5 | 1
row 2 : Torres | 24 | 14 | 9 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 38 | 17 | 2 | 1
row 3 : Kuyt | 38 | 12 | 11 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 51 | 15 | 0 | 0
row 4 : Benayoun | 32 | 8 | 9 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 42 | 9 | 0 | 1
row 5 : Keane | 19 | 5 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 28 | 7 | 2 | 0
row 6 : Riera | 28 | 3 | 9 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 40 | 5 | 1 | 3
row 7 : Alonso | 33 | 3 | 10 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 47 | 4 | 7 | 1
row 8 : Babel | 27 | 3 | 10 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 42 | 4 | 3 | 0
row 9 : Aurélio | 24 | 2 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 33 | 3 | 0 | 2
row 10 : N'Gog | 14 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 19 | 3 | 1 | 0
row 11 : Dossena | 16 | 1 | 7 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 26 | 2 | 2 | 2
row 12 : Agger | 18 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 26 | 2 | 4 | 2
row 13 : Hyypiä | 16 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 19 | 2 | 1 | 0
row 14 : Lucas | 25 | 1 | 10 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 39 | 3 | 4 | 1
row 15 : Arbeloa | 29 | 1 | 12 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 43 | 1 | 8 | 3
row 16 : Plessis | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0
row 17 : Carragher | 38 | 0 | 12 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 54 | 0 | 5 | 0
row 18 : Mascherano | 27 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 38 | 0 | 6 | 3
row 19 : Škrtel | 21 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 30 | 0 | 4 | 1
row 20 : El Zhar | 15 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 19 | 0 | 3 | 0
row 21 : Insúa | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0
row 22 : Pennant | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0
row 23 : Spearing | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0
row 24 : Darby | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0
row 25 : Degen | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0
row 26 : Kelly | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0
row 27 : Voronin | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What is the total PL G of player pennant, who has less than 7 CL G, less than 7 CL apps, and a FA YC of 0?

Answer: 1.0
[Table] header: Outcome | Date | Tournament | Surface | Partner | Opponents | Score row 1 : Winner | 16 February 2008 | Majorca , Spain | Clay | Polona Hercog | Leticia Costas Maite Gabar | 7–6 (7–2) , 6–
row 2 : Runner-up | 19 April 2008 | Bari , Italy | Clay | Polona Hercog | Alberta Brianti Anna Floris | 3–6, 3–6
row 3 : Winner | 4 May 2008 | Makarska , Croatia | Clay | Polona Hercog | Tadeja Majeric Maša Ze | 7–5, 6–2
row 4 : Runner-up | 11 April 2010 | Hvar , Croatia | Clay | Leonie Mekel | Marlot Meddens Nicole Thyssen | 4–6, 1–6
row 5 : Runner-up | 31 October 2010 | Cairo , Egypt | Clay | Maša Zec Peškirič | Réka-Luca Jani Martina K | 7–6 (7–4) , 1–
row 6 : Runner-up | 3 July 2011 | Stuttgart-Vaihingen , | Clay | Hana Birnerová | Darija Jurak Anaïs Laurendon | 6–4, 1–6, [0–10
row 7 : Runner-up | 10 July 2011 | Aschaffenburg , Germany | Clay | Hana Birnerová | Pemra Özgen Yurik | 4–6, 6–7 (5–7)
row 8 : Runner-up | 23 October 2011 | Glasgow , United Kingdom | Hard (i) | Yvonne Meusburger | Emma Laine Kristina Mladenovic | 2–6, 4–6
row 9 : Winner | 25 March 2012 | Bath , United Kingdom | Hard (i) | Tatjana Malek | Julie Coin Melanie South | 6–3, 3–6, [10–3
row 10 : Runner-up | 6 April 2012 | Tessenderlo , Belgium | Clay (i) | Tatjana Malek | Demi Schuurs Maryna Zanevska | 4–6, 3–6
row 11 : Winner | 15 July 2012 | Aschaffenburg , Germany | Clay | Florencia Molinero | Malou Ejdesgaard Réka | 6–3, 7–6 (7–2)
row 12 : Runner-up | 13 April 2013 | Edgbaston , United Kingdom | Hard (i) | Richèl Hogenkamp | Kristina Barrois Ana Vrl | 4–6, 6–7 (2–7)
row 13 : Winner | 4 May 2013 | Civitavecchia , Italy | Clay | Renata Voráčová | Paula Kania Magda Linette | 6–3, 6–4
row 14 : Runner-up | 30 June 2013 | Stuttgart-Vaihingen , | Clay | Sandra Zaniewska | Kristina Barrois Laura Siegem | 6–7 (1–7) , 4–
row 15 : Winner | 6 September 2013 | Mestre , Italy | Clay | Laura Thorpe | Petra Krejsová Terez | 7–6 (7–5) , 7-5 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: Which tournament had an opponent of petra krejsová tereza smitková?

Answer: none
[Table] header: Outcome | Date | Tournament | Surface | Partner | Opponents | Score row 1 : Winner | 16 February 2008 | Majorca , Spain | Clay | Polona Hercog | Leticia Costas Maite Gabar | 7–6 (7–2) , 6–
row 2 : Runner-up | 19 April 2008 | Bari , Italy | Clay | Polona Hercog | Alberta Brianti Anna Floris | 3–6, 3–6
row 3 : Winner | 4 May 2008 | Makarska , Croatia | Clay | Polona Hercog | Tadeja Majeric Maša Ze | 7–5, 6–2
row 4 : Runner-up | 11 April 2010 | Hvar , Croatia | Clay | Leonie Mekel | Marlot Meddens Nicole Thyssen | 4–6, 1–6
row 5 : Runner-up | 31 October 2010 | Cairo , Egypt | Clay | Maša Zec Peškirič | Réka-Luca Jani Martina K | 7–6 (7–4) , 1–
row 6 : Runner-up | 3 July 2011 | Stuttgart-Vaihingen , | Clay | Hana Birnerová | Darija Jurak Anaïs Laurendon | 6–4, 1–6, [0–10
row 7 : Runner-up | 10 July 2011 | Aschaffenburg , Germany | Clay | Hana Birnerová | Pemra Özgen Yurik | 4–6, 6–7 (5–7)
row 8 : Runner-up | 23 October 2011 | Glasgow , United Kingdom | Hard (i) | Yvonne Meusburger | Emma Laine Kristina Mladenovic | 2–6, 4–6
row 9 : Winner | 25 March 2012 | Bath , United Kingdom | Hard (i) | Tatjana Malek | Julie Coin Melanie South | 6–3, 3–6, [10–3
row 10 : Runner-up | 6 April 2012 | Tessenderlo , Belgium | Clay (i) | Tatjana Malek | Demi Schuurs Maryna Zanevska | 4–6, 3–6
row 11 : Winner | 15 July 2012 | Aschaffenburg , Germany | Clay | Florencia Molinero | Malou Ejdesgaard Réka | 6–3, 7–6 (7–2)
row 12 : Runner-up | 13 April 2013 | Edgbaston , United Kingdom | Hard (i) | Richèl Hogenkamp | Kristina Barrois Ana Vrl | 4–6, 6–7 (2–7)
row 13 : Winner | 4 May 2013 | Civitavecchia , Italy | Clay | Renata Voráčová | Paula Kania Magda Linette | 6–3, 6–4
row 14 : Runner-up | 30 June 2013 | Stuttgart-Vaihingen , | Clay | Sandra Zaniewska | Kristina Barrois Laura Siegem | 6–7 (1–7) , 4–
row 15 : Winner | 6 September 2013 | Mestre , Italy | Clay | Laura Thorpe | Petra Krejsová Terez | 7–6 (7–5) , 7-5 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What was the outcome when darija jurak anaïs laurendon was the opponent?

Answer: Runner-up
[Table] header: Outcome | Date | Tournament | Surface | Partner | Opponents | Score row 1 : Winner | 16 February 2008 | Majorca , Spain | Clay | Polona Hercog | Leticia Costas Maite Gabar | 7–6 (7–2) , 6–
row 2 : Runner-up | 19 April 2008 | Bari , Italy | Clay | Polona Hercog | Alberta Brianti Anna Floris | 3–6, 3–6
row 3 : Winner | 4 May 2008 | Makarska , Croatia | Clay | Polona Hercog | Tadeja Majeric Maša Ze | 7–5, 6–2
row 4 : Runner-up | 11 April 2010 | Hvar , Croatia | Clay | Leonie Mekel | Marlot Meddens Nicole Thyssen | 4–6, 1–6
row 5 : Runner-up | 31 October 2010 | Cairo , Egypt | Clay | Maša Zec Peškirič | Réka-Luca Jani Martina K | 7–6 (7–4) , 1–
row 6 : Runner-up | 3 July 2011 | Stuttgart-Vaihingen , | Clay | Hana Birnerová | Darija Jurak Anaïs Laurendon | 6–4, 1–6, [0–10
row 7 : Runner-up | 10 July 2011 | Aschaffenburg , Germany | Clay | Hana Birnerová | Pemra Özgen Yurik | 4–6, 6–7 (5–7)
row 8 : Runner-up | 23 October 2011 | Glasgow , United Kingdom | Hard (i) | Yvonne Meusburger | Emma Laine Kristina Mladenovic | 2–6, 4–6
row 9 : Winner | 25 March 2012 | Bath , United Kingdom | Hard (i) | Tatjana Malek | Julie Coin Melanie South | 6–3, 3–6, [10–3
row 10 : Runner-up | 6 April 2012 | Tessenderlo , Belgium | Clay (i) | Tatjana Malek | Demi Schuurs Maryna Zanevska | 4–6, 3–6
row 11 : Winner | 15 July 2012 | Aschaffenburg , Germany | Clay | Florencia Molinero | Malou Ejdesgaard Réka | 6–3, 7–6 (7–2)
row 12 : Runner-up | 13 April 2013 | Edgbaston , United Kingdom | Hard (i) | Richèl Hogenkamp | Kristina Barrois Ana Vrl | 4–6, 6–7 (2–7)
row 13 : Winner | 4 May 2013 | Civitavecchia , Italy | Clay | Renata Voráčová | Paula Kania Magda Linette | 6–3, 6–4
row 14 : Runner-up | 30 June 2013 | Stuttgart-Vaihingen , | Clay | Sandra Zaniewska | Kristina Barrois Laura Siegem | 6–7 (1–7) , 4–
row 15 : Winner | 6 September 2013 | Mestre , Italy | Clay | Laura Thorpe | Petra Krejsová Terez | 7–6 (7–5) , 7-5 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: When was the outcome runner-up with a score of 4–6, 3–6?

Answer: 6 April 2012
[Table] header: Game | Date | Opponent | Score | Decision | Location/Attendance | Record row 1 : 63 | 1 | Philadelphia Flyers | 0-3 | Brodeur | Prudential Center - 17,625 | 41-19-3
row 2 : 64 | 3 | Toronto Maple Leafs | 3-2 (OT) | Brodeur | Air Canada Centre - 19,389 | 42-19-3
row 3 : 65 | 7 | New York Islanders | 3-7 | Brodeur | Nassau Coliseum - 15,5 | 42-20-3
row 4 : 66 | 10 | Calgary Flames | 2-3 | Brodeur | Prudential Center - 14,598 | 43-20-3
row 5 : 67 | 12 | Phoenix Coyotes | 2-5 | Brodeur | Prudential Center - 14,578 | 44-20-3
row 6 : 68 | 14 | Montreal Canadiens | 3-1 | Brodeur | Bell Centre - 21,273 | 45-20-3
row 7 : 69 | 17 | Chicago Blackhawks | 2-3 | Brodeur | Prudential Center - 17,625 | 46-20-3
row 8 : 70 | 18 | Carolina Hurricanes | 2-4 | Weekes | RBC Center - 18,544 | 46-21-3
row 9 : 71 | 20 | Minnesota Wild | 0-4 | Brodeur | Prudential Center - 17,625 | 47-21-3
row 10 : 72 | 22 | Boston Bruins | 1-4 | Brodeur | TD Banknorth Garden - 17, | 47-22-3
row 11 : 73 | 23 | Philadelphia Flyers | 2-4 | Brodeur | Wachovia Center - 19,762 | 47-23-3
row 12 : 74 | 27 | Chicago Blackhawks | 2-3 (OT) | Brodeur | United Center - 21,617 | 47-23-4
row 13 : 75 | 28 | Carolina Hurricanes | 2-1 | Brodeur | Prudential Center - 17,018 | 47-24-4
row 14 : 76 | 30 | New York Rangers | 0-3 | Brodeur | Madison Square Garden - 18,200 | 47-25-4 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What is the highest game with a 47-21-3 record?

Answer: 71.0
[Table] header: LB&SC Number | Built | S.R. Number | Withdrawal | Notes row 1 : 11 | Cannot handle non-empty timestamp | 2011 | Cannot handle non-empty timestamp | I2
row 2 : 12 | Cannot handle non-empty timestamp | 2012 | Cannot handle non-empty timestamp | I2
row 3 : 13 | Cannot handle non-empty timestamp | 2013 | Cannot handle non-empty timestamp | I2, became W.D. 72400 Earl
row 4 : 14 | Cannot handle non-empty timestamp | 2014 | Cannot handle non-empty timestamp | I2
row 5 : 15 | Cannot handle non-empty timestamp | 2015 | Cannot handle non-empty timestamp | I2
row 6 : 16 | Cannot handle non-empty timestamp | 2016 | Cannot handle non-empty timestamp | I2
row 7 : 17 | Cannot handle non-empty timestamp | 2017 | Cannot handle non-empty timestamp | I2
row 8 : 18 | Cannot handle non-empty timestamp | 2018 | Cannot handle non-empty timestamp | I2
row 9 : 19 | Cannot handle non-empty timestamp | 2019 | Cannot handle non-empty timestamp | I2, became W.D. 72401
row 10 : 20 | Cannot handle non-empty timestamp | 2020 | Cannot handle non-empty timestamp | I2
row 11 : 31 | Cannot handle non-empty timestamp | 2031 | Cannot handle non-empty timestamp | I4
row 12 : 32 | Cannot handle non-empty timestamp | 2032 | Cannot handle non-empty timestamp | I4
row 13 : 33 | Cannot handle non-empty timestamp | 2033 | Cannot handle non-empty timestamp | I4
row 14 : 34 | Cannot handle non-empty timestamp | 2034 | Cannot handle non-empty timestamp | I4
row 15 : 35 | Cannot handle non-empty timestamp | 2035 | Cannot handle non-empty timestamp | I4 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: what is the s.r. number when lb&sc number is 34?

Answer: 2034.0
[Table] header: LB&SC Number | Built | S.R. Number | Withdrawal | Notes row 1 : 11 | Cannot handle non-empty timestamp | 2011 | Cannot handle non-empty timestamp | I2
row 2 : 12 | Cannot handle non-empty timestamp | 2012 | Cannot handle non-empty timestamp | I2
row 3 : 13 | Cannot handle non-empty timestamp | 2013 | Cannot handle non-empty timestamp | I2, became W.D. 72400 Earl
row 4 : 14 | Cannot handle non-empty timestamp | 2014 | Cannot handle non-empty timestamp | I2
row 5 : 15 | Cannot handle non-empty timestamp | 2015 | Cannot handle non-empty timestamp | I2
row 6 : 16 | Cannot handle non-empty timestamp | 2016 | Cannot handle non-empty timestamp | I2
row 7 : 17 | Cannot handle non-empty timestamp | 2017 | Cannot handle non-empty timestamp | I2
row 8 : 18 | Cannot handle non-empty timestamp | 2018 | Cannot handle non-empty timestamp | I2
row 9 : 19 | Cannot handle non-empty timestamp | 2019 | Cannot handle non-empty timestamp | I2, became W.D. 72401
row 10 : 20 | Cannot handle non-empty timestamp | 2020 | Cannot handle non-empty timestamp | I2
row 11 : 31 | Cannot handle non-empty timestamp | 2031 | Cannot handle non-empty timestamp | I4
row 12 : 32 | Cannot handle non-empty timestamp | 2032 | Cannot handle non-empty timestamp | I4
row 13 : 33 | Cannot handle non-empty timestamp | 2033 | Cannot handle non-empty timestamp | I4
row 14 : 34 | Cannot handle non-empty timestamp | 2034 | Cannot handle non-empty timestamp | I4
row 15 : 35 | Cannot handle non-empty timestamp | 2035 | Cannot handle non-empty timestamp | I4 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: what is the withdrawal when the lb&sc number is less than 16 and the s.r. number is 2011?

Answer: Cannot handle non-empty timestamp
[Table] header: LB&SC Number | Built | S.R. Number | Withdrawal | Notes row 1 : 11 | Cannot handle non-empty timestamp | 2011 | Cannot handle non-empty timestamp | I2
row 2 : 12 | Cannot handle non-empty timestamp | 2012 | Cannot handle non-empty timestamp | I2
row 3 : 13 | Cannot handle non-empty timestamp | 2013 | Cannot handle non-empty timestamp | I2, became W.D. 72400 Earl
row 4 : 14 | Cannot handle non-empty timestamp | 2014 | Cannot handle non-empty timestamp | I2
row 5 : 15 | Cannot handle non-empty timestamp | 2015 | Cannot handle non-empty timestamp | I2
row 6 : 16 | Cannot handle non-empty timestamp | 2016 | Cannot handle non-empty timestamp | I2
row 7 : 17 | Cannot handle non-empty timestamp | 2017 | Cannot handle non-empty timestamp | I2
row 8 : 18 | Cannot handle non-empty timestamp | 2018 | Cannot handle non-empty timestamp | I2
row 9 : 19 | Cannot handle non-empty timestamp | 2019 | Cannot handle non-empty timestamp | I2, became W.D. 72401
row 10 : 20 | Cannot handle non-empty timestamp | 2020 | Cannot handle non-empty timestamp | I2
row 11 : 31 | Cannot handle non-empty timestamp | 2031 | Cannot handle non-empty timestamp | I4
row 12 : 32 | Cannot handle non-empty timestamp | 2032 | Cannot handle non-empty timestamp | I4
row 13 : 33 | Cannot handle non-empty timestamp | 2033 | Cannot handle non-empty timestamp | I4
row 14 : 34 | Cannot handle non-empty timestamp | 2034 | Cannot handle non-empty timestamp | I4
row 15 : 35 | Cannot handle non-empty timestamp | 2035 | Cannot handle non-empty timestamp | I4 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: what is the built when s.r. number is less than 2033, lb&sc number is less than 18, notes is i2 and withdrawal is cannot handle non-empty timestamp argument! 1935?

Answer: none