sail/symbolic-instruction-tuning huggingface dataset:
[Table] header: Date | Tournament | Winning score | Margin of victory | Runner(s)-up row 1 : Jul 22, 1962 | Lady Carling Open | +4 (74-77-75=22 | 3 strokes | Mary Mills
row 2 : Sep 9, 1962 | Eugene Open | −4 (75-69-79- | 7 strokes | Jackie Pung
row 3 : Jul 7, 1963 | Lady Carling Eastern Open | +4 (71-79-71=22 | 2 strokes | JoAnne Carner (a)
row 4 : Aug 9, 1964 | Waterloo Women's Open Invitational | −5 (72-71-68= | 4 strokes | Ruth Jessen
row 5 : May 22, 1966 | Babe Zaharias Open | −1 (71-68-70= | 2 strokes | Kathy Whitworth
row 6 : Sep 17, 1967 | Shirley Englehorn Invitational | −3 (71-70-69= | Playoff | Kathy Whitworth
row 7 : Aug 10, 1968 | Concord Open | −2 (77-76-76= | 3 strokes | Sandra Haynie
row 8 : May 17, 1970 | Johnny Londoff Chevrolet Tournament | E (74-74-68=216) | 2 strokes | Carol Mann
row 9 : May 31, 1970 | O'Sullivan Ladies Open | −6 (71-68-71= | Playoff | Margie Masters
row 10 : Jun 7, 1970 | Lady Carling Open | −9 (72-67-71= | 1 stroke | Carol Mann
row 11 : Jun 13, 1970 | LPGA Championship | −7 (70-70-75- | Playoff | Kathy Whitworth [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: Who is the runner(s)-up for the Lady Carling Open with 3 strokes margin of victory?

Answer: Mary Mills
[Table] header: Week | Date | Opponent | Result | Attendance row 1 : 1 | September 6, 1992 | at Chicago Bears | L 27-24 | 63,672
row 2 : 2 | September 13, 1992 | Minnesota Vikings | W 31-17 | 57,519
row 3 : 3 | September 20, 1992 | at Washington Redskins | L 13-10 | 55,818
row 4 : 4 | September 27, 1992 | Tampa Bay Buccaneers | L 27-23 | 51,374
row 5 : 5 | October 4, 1992 | New Orleans Saints | L 13-7 | 66,971
row 6 : 6 | Bye | Bye | Bye | Bye
row 7 : 7 | October 15, 1992 | at Minnesota Vikings | L 31-14 | 52,816
row 8 : 8 | October 25, 1992 | at Tampa Bay Buccaneers | W 38-7 | 53,995
row 9 : 9 | November 1, 1992 | Green Bay Packers | L 27-13 | 60,594
row 10 : 10 | November 8, 1992 | Dallas Cowboys | L 37-3 | 74,816
row 11 : 11 | November 15, 1992 | at Pittsburgh Steelers | L 17-14 | 52,242
row 12 : 12 | November 22, 1992 | at Cincinnati Bengals | W 19-13 | 48,574
row 13 : 13 | November 26, 1992 | Houston Oilers | L 24-21 | 73,711
row 14 : 14 | December 6, 1992 | at Green Bay Packers | L 38-10 | 49,469
row 15 : 15 | December 13, 1992 | Cleveland Browns | W 24-14 | 65,970
row 16 : 16 | December 20, 1992 | Chicago Bears | W 16-3 | 72,777
row 17 : 17 | December 28, 1992 | at San Francisco 49ers | L 24-6 | 55,907 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What is the attendance in a week larter than 4, on December 6, 1992?

Answer: 49469.0
[Table] header: Week | Date | Opponent | Result | Attendance row 1 : 1 | September 6, 1992 | at Chicago Bears | L 27-24 | 63,672
row 2 : 2 | September 13, 1992 | Minnesota Vikings | W 31-17 | 57,519
row 3 : 3 | September 20, 1992 | at Washington Redskins | L 13-10 | 55,818
row 4 : 4 | September 27, 1992 | Tampa Bay Buccaneers | L 27-23 | 51,374
row 5 : 5 | October 4, 1992 | New Orleans Saints | L 13-7 | 66,971
row 6 : 6 | Bye | Bye | Bye | Bye
row 7 : 7 | October 15, 1992 | at Minnesota Vikings | L 31-14 | 52,816
row 8 : 8 | October 25, 1992 | at Tampa Bay Buccaneers | W 38-7 | 53,995
row 9 : 9 | November 1, 1992 | Green Bay Packers | L 27-13 | 60,594
row 10 : 10 | November 8, 1992 | Dallas Cowboys | L 37-3 | 74,816
row 11 : 11 | November 15, 1992 | at Pittsburgh Steelers | L 17-14 | 52,242
row 12 : 12 | November 22, 1992 | at Cincinnati Bengals | W 19-13 | 48,574
row 13 : 13 | November 26, 1992 | Houston Oilers | L 24-21 | 73,711
row 14 : 14 | December 6, 1992 | at Green Bay Packers | L 38-10 | 49,469
row 15 : 15 | December 13, 1992 | Cleveland Browns | W 24-14 | 65,970
row 16 : 16 | December 20, 1992 | Chicago Bears | W 16-3 | 72,777
row 17 : 17 | December 28, 1992 | at San Francisco 49ers | L 24-6 | 55,907 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What week has a Date of October 4, 1992?

Answer: 5.0
[Table] header: Week | Date | Opponent | Result | Attendance row 1 : 1 | September 6, 1992 | at Chicago Bears | L 27-24 | 63,672
row 2 : 2 | September 13, 1992 | Minnesota Vikings | W 31-17 | 57,519
row 3 : 3 | September 20, 1992 | at Washington Redskins | L 13-10 | 55,818
row 4 : 4 | September 27, 1992 | Tampa Bay Buccaneers | L 27-23 | 51,374
row 5 : 5 | October 4, 1992 | New Orleans Saints | L 13-7 | 66,971
row 6 : 6 | Bye | Bye | Bye | Bye
row 7 : 7 | October 15, 1992 | at Minnesota Vikings | L 31-14 | 52,816
row 8 : 8 | October 25, 1992 | at Tampa Bay Buccaneers | W 38-7 | 53,995
row 9 : 9 | November 1, 1992 | Green Bay Packers | L 27-13 | 60,594
row 10 : 10 | November 8, 1992 | Dallas Cowboys | L 37-3 | 74,816
row 11 : 11 | November 15, 1992 | at Pittsburgh Steelers | L 17-14 | 52,242
row 12 : 12 | November 22, 1992 | at Cincinnati Bengals | W 19-13 | 48,574
row 13 : 13 | November 26, 1992 | Houston Oilers | L 24-21 | 73,711
row 14 : 14 | December 6, 1992 | at Green Bay Packers | L 38-10 | 49,469
row 15 : 15 | December 13, 1992 | Cleveland Browns | W 24-14 | 65,970
row 16 : 16 | December 20, 1992 | Chicago Bears | W 16-3 | 72,777
row 17 : 17 | December 28, 1992 | at San Francisco 49ers | L 24-6 | 55,907 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What is the date when the result was l 37-3?

Answer: November 8, 1992
[Table] header: Week | Date | Opponent | Result | Attendance row 1 : 1 | September 6, 1992 | at Chicago Bears | L 27-24 | 63,672
row 2 : 2 | September 13, 1992 | Minnesota Vikings | W 31-17 | 57,519
row 3 : 3 | September 20, 1992 | at Washington Redskins | L 13-10 | 55,818
row 4 : 4 | September 27, 1992 | Tampa Bay Buccaneers | L 27-23 | 51,374
row 5 : 5 | October 4, 1992 | New Orleans Saints | L 13-7 | 66,971
row 6 : 6 | Bye | Bye | Bye | Bye
row 7 : 7 | October 15, 1992 | at Minnesota Vikings | L 31-14 | 52,816
row 8 : 8 | October 25, 1992 | at Tampa Bay Buccaneers | W 38-7 | 53,995
row 9 : 9 | November 1, 1992 | Green Bay Packers | L 27-13 | 60,594
row 10 : 10 | November 8, 1992 | Dallas Cowboys | L 37-3 | 74,816
row 11 : 11 | November 15, 1992 | at Pittsburgh Steelers | L 17-14 | 52,242
row 12 : 12 | November 22, 1992 | at Cincinnati Bengals | W 19-13 | 48,574
row 13 : 13 | November 26, 1992 | Houston Oilers | L 24-21 | 73,711
row 14 : 14 | December 6, 1992 | at Green Bay Packers | L 38-10 | 49,469
row 15 : 15 | December 13, 1992 | Cleveland Browns | W 24-14 | 65,970
row 16 : 16 | December 20, 1992 | Chicago Bears | W 16-3 | 72,777
row 17 : 17 | December 28, 1992 | at San Francisco 49ers | L 24-6 | 55,907 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What is the attendance when the opponent was the Houston Oilers?

Answer: 73711.0
[Table] header: Lane | Name | Country | Reaction Time | Time row 1 : 4 | Veronica Campbell-Brown | Jamaica | 0.172 | 21.74
row 2 : 5 | Allyson Felix | United States | 0.193 | 21.93
row 3 : 6 | Kerron Stewart | Jamaica | 0.199 | 22.00
row 4 : 9 | Muna Lee | United States | 0.176 | 22.01
row 5 : 7 | Marshevet Hooker | United States | 0.200 | 22.34
row 6 : 8 | Sherone Simpson | Jamaica | 0.167 | 22.36
row 7 : 2 | Debbie Ferguson-McKenzie | Bahamas | 0.175 | 22.61
row 8 : 3 | Cydonie Mothersille | Cayman Islands | 0.206 | 22.68 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: Which Lane has a Reaction Time smaller than 0.199, and a Country of united states, and a Name of muna lee, and a Time larger than 22.01?

Answer: none
[Table] header: Lane | Name | Country | Reaction Time | Time row 1 : 4 | Veronica Campbell-Brown | Jamaica | 0.172 | 21.74
row 2 : 5 | Allyson Felix | United States | 0.193 | 21.93
row 3 : 6 | Kerron Stewart | Jamaica | 0.199 | 22.00
row 4 : 9 | Muna Lee | United States | 0.176 | 22.01
row 5 : 7 | Marshevet Hooker | United States | 0.200 | 22.34
row 6 : 8 | Sherone Simpson | Jamaica | 0.167 | 22.36
row 7 : 2 | Debbie Ferguson-McKenzie | Bahamas | 0.175 | 22.61
row 8 : 3 | Cydonie Mothersille | Cayman Islands | 0.206 | 22.68 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: How many Lanes have a Country of jamaica, and a Name of kerron stewart, and a Time larger than 22?

Answer: none
[Table] header: Lane | Name | Country | Reaction Time | Time row 1 : 4 | Veronica Campbell-Brown | Jamaica | 0.172 | 21.74
row 2 : 5 | Allyson Felix | United States | 0.193 | 21.93
row 3 : 6 | Kerron Stewart | Jamaica | 0.199 | 22.00
row 4 : 9 | Muna Lee | United States | 0.176 | 22.01
row 5 : 7 | Marshevet Hooker | United States | 0.200 | 22.34
row 6 : 8 | Sherone Simpson | Jamaica | 0.167 | 22.36
row 7 : 2 | Debbie Ferguson-McKenzie | Bahamas | 0.175 | 22.61
row 8 : 3 | Cydonie Mothersille | Cayman Islands | 0.206 | 22.68 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: How many Times have a Reaction Time larger than 0.17500000000000002, and a Lane of 3?

Answer: 1.0
[Table] header: Lane | Name | Country | Reaction Time | Time row 1 : 4 | Veronica Campbell-Brown | Jamaica | 0.172 | 21.74
row 2 : 5 | Allyson Felix | United States | 0.193 | 21.93
row 3 : 6 | Kerron Stewart | Jamaica | 0.199 | 22.00
row 4 : 9 | Muna Lee | United States | 0.176 | 22.01
row 5 : 7 | Marshevet Hooker | United States | 0.200 | 22.34
row 6 : 8 | Sherone Simpson | Jamaica | 0.167 | 22.36
row 7 : 2 | Debbie Ferguson-McKenzie | Bahamas | 0.175 | 22.61
row 8 : 3 | Cydonie Mothersille | Cayman Islands | 0.206 | 22.68 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: Which Lane has a Country of united states, and a Time smaller than 22.01, and a Reaction Time smaller than 0.193?

Answer: none
[Table] header: Season | Teams | Minor Ladder Position | Finals Qualification | Final Ladder Position | ACL Qualification | ACL Placing row 1 : 2005-06 | 8 | 7th | DNQ | 7th | DNQ | n/a
row 2 : 2006-07 | 8 | Premiers | Qualified | Champions | Qualified for 2008 | DNQ
row 3 : 2007-08 | 8 | 5th | DNQ | 5th | DNQ | Group Stages (2nd)
row 4 : 2008-09 | 8 | Premiers | Qualified | Champions | Qualified for 2010 | DNQ
row 5 : 2009-10 | 10 | 2nd | Qualified | 2nd | Qualified for 2011 | Group Stages (4th)
row 6 : 2010-11 | 11 | 5th | Qualified | 5th | DNQ | Group Stages (4th)
row 7 : 2011-12 | 10 | 8th | DNQ | 8th | DNQ | DNQ
row 8 : 2012-13 | 10 | 3rd | Qualified | 3rd | DNQ | DNQ [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What's the ladder position when team is less than 10 and the Finals qualifications were DNQ?

Answer: 7th, 5th
[Table] header: Season | Teams | Minor Ladder Position | Finals Qualification | Final Ladder Position | ACL Qualification | ACL Placing row 1 : 2005-06 | 8 | 7th | DNQ | 7th | DNQ | n/a
row 2 : 2006-07 | 8 | Premiers | Qualified | Champions | Qualified for 2008 | DNQ
row 3 : 2007-08 | 8 | 5th | DNQ | 5th | DNQ | Group Stages (2nd)
row 4 : 2008-09 | 8 | Premiers | Qualified | Champions | Qualified for 2010 | DNQ
row 5 : 2009-10 | 10 | 2nd | Qualified | 2nd | Qualified for 2011 | Group Stages (4th)
row 6 : 2010-11 | 11 | 5th | Qualified | 5th | DNQ | Group Stages (4th)
row 7 : 2011-12 | 10 | 8th | DNQ | 8th | DNQ | DNQ
row 8 : 2012-13 | 10 | 3rd | Qualified | 3rd | DNQ | DNQ [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What is the total teams during the 2012-13 season?

Answer: 10.0
[Table] header: Season | Teams | Minor Ladder Position | Finals Qualification | Final Ladder Position | ACL Qualification | ACL Placing row 1 : 2005-06 | 8 | 7th | DNQ | 7th | DNQ | n/a
row 2 : 2006-07 | 8 | Premiers | Qualified | Champions | Qualified for 2008 | DNQ
row 3 : 2007-08 | 8 | 5th | DNQ | 5th | DNQ | Group Stages (2nd)
row 4 : 2008-09 | 8 | Premiers | Qualified | Champions | Qualified for 2010 | DNQ
row 5 : 2009-10 | 10 | 2nd | Qualified | 2nd | Qualified for 2011 | Group Stages (4th)
row 6 : 2010-11 | 11 | 5th | Qualified | 5th | DNQ | Group Stages (4th)
row 7 : 2011-12 | 10 | 8th | DNQ | 8th | DNQ | DNQ
row 8 : 2012-13 | 10 | 3rd | Qualified | 3rd | DNQ | DNQ [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What's the ACL qualification when the minor ladder position is 5th and the finals qualifications were DNQ?

Answer: DNQ
[Table] header: Season | Teams | Minor Ladder Position | Finals Qualification | Final Ladder Position | ACL Qualification | ACL Placing row 1 : 2005-06 | 8 | 7th | DNQ | 7th | DNQ | n/a
row 2 : 2006-07 | 8 | Premiers | Qualified | Champions | Qualified for 2008 | DNQ
row 3 : 2007-08 | 8 | 5th | DNQ | 5th | DNQ | Group Stages (2nd)
row 4 : 2008-09 | 8 | Premiers | Qualified | Champions | Qualified for 2010 | DNQ
row 5 : 2009-10 | 10 | 2nd | Qualified | 2nd | Qualified for 2011 | Group Stages (4th)
row 6 : 2010-11 | 11 | 5th | Qualified | 5th | DNQ | Group Stages (4th)
row 7 : 2011-12 | 10 | 8th | DNQ | 8th | DNQ | DNQ
row 8 : 2012-13 | 10 | 3rd | Qualified | 3rd | DNQ | DNQ [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What's the finals qualification during the 2009-10 season?

Answer: Qualified
[Table] header: Year | Labour | Lib Dem | Green | IWCA | Independent | Conservative row 1 : 2000 | 21 | 21 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 1
row 2 : 2002 | 29 | 15 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0
row 3 : 2004 | 20 | 18 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 0
row 4 : 2006 | 17 | 19 | 8 | 4 | 0 | 0
row 5 : 2008 | 23 | 16 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 0
row 6 : 2010 | 26 | 16 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0
row 7 : 2012 | 29 | 13 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 0 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: Name the the average Lib Dem with Conservative smaller than 0?

Answer: none
[Table] header: Year | Labour | Lib Dem | Green | IWCA | Independent | Conservative row 1 : 2000 | 21 | 21 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 1
row 2 : 2002 | 29 | 15 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0
row 3 : 2004 | 20 | 18 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 0
row 4 : 2006 | 17 | 19 | 8 | 4 | 0 | 0
row 5 : 2008 | 23 | 16 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 0
row 6 : 2010 | 26 | 16 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0
row 7 : 2012 | 29 | 13 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 0 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: Name the lowest Green with a Year larger than 2010, and a Labour larger than 29? Question 3

Answer: none
[Table] header: Year | Labour | Lib Dem | Green | IWCA | Independent | Conservative row 1 : 2000 | 21 | 21 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 1
row 2 : 2002 | 29 | 15 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0
row 3 : 2004 | 20 | 18 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 0
row 4 : 2006 | 17 | 19 | 8 | 4 | 0 | 0
row 5 : 2008 | 23 | 16 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 0
row 6 : 2010 | 26 | 16 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0
row 7 : 2012 | 29 | 13 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 0 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: Name the average Independent with a Green larger than 7, and a Conservative smaller than 0?

Answer: none
[Table] header: Year | Labour | Lib Dem | Green | IWCA | Independent | Conservative row 1 : 2000 | 21 | 21 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 1
row 2 : 2002 | 29 | 15 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0
row 3 : 2004 | 20 | 18 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 0
row 4 : 2006 | 17 | 19 | 8 | 4 | 0 | 0
row 5 : 2008 | 23 | 16 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 0
row 6 : 2010 | 26 | 16 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0
row 7 : 2012 | 29 | 13 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 0 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: Name the highest Labour with Lib Dem larger than 21?

Answer: none
[Table] header: Season | High | Average | Total | League Ranking row 1 : 2005-06 season | 18,026 | 14,158 | 141,578 | 3rd
row 2 : 2006-07 season | 50,333 | 27,728 | 305,011 | 1st
row 3 : 2007-08 season | 31,884 | 26,064 | 260,642 | 1st
row 4 : 2008-09 season | 31,564 | 24,516 | 269,671 | 1st
row 5 : 2009-10 season | 30,668 | 20,750 | 290,503 | 1st
row 6 : 2010-11 season | 32,321 | 15,234 | 228,517 | 1st
row 7 : 2011-12 season | 40,651 | 20,281 | 263,648 | 1st
row 8 : 2012-13 season | 42,032 | 23,089 | 300,158 | 1st [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What's the average that has a total more than 263,648, a high of 31,564, and ranking of 1st?

Answer: 24516.0
[Table] header: Season | High | Average | Total | League Ranking row 1 : 2005-06 season | 18,026 | 14,158 | 141,578 | 3rd
row 2 : 2006-07 season | 50,333 | 27,728 | 305,011 | 1st
row 3 : 2007-08 season | 31,884 | 26,064 | 260,642 | 1st
row 4 : 2008-09 season | 31,564 | 24,516 | 269,671 | 1st
row 5 : 2009-10 season | 30,668 | 20,750 | 290,503 | 1st
row 6 : 2010-11 season | 32,321 | 15,234 | 228,517 | 1st
row 7 : 2011-12 season | 40,651 | 20,281 | 263,648 | 1st
row 8 : 2012-13 season | 42,032 | 23,089 | 300,158 | 1st [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What's the total of the 2012-13 season when they're ranked 1st, a high more than 31,884 and an average more than 15,234?

Answer: 300158.0
[Table] header: Outcome | Date | Tournament | Surface | Opponent in the final | Score in the final row 1 : Winner | 24 November 2008 | La Vall d'Uixó , | Clay | Leticia Costas | 6–2, 6–1
row 2 : Runner-up | 14 December 2009 | Vinaròs , Spain | Clay | Garbiñe Muguruza | 2–6, 0–3, ret
row 3 : Runner-up | 5 April 2010 | Hvar , Croatia | Clay | Mădălina Gojnea | 4–6, 4–6
row 4 : Winner | 18 April 2011 | Hvar , Croatia | Clay | Donna Vekić | 7–5, 7–6 (7–2)
row 5 : Runner-up | 22 July 2013 | Austin, Texas , United States | Hard | Lauren Albanese | 5–7, 7–5, 6–7 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What is the score in the final of the tournament with a clay surface on 18 April 2011?

Answer: 7–5, 7–6 (7–2)
[Table] header: Outcome | Date | Tournament | Surface | Opponent in the final | Score in the final row 1 : Winner | 24 November 2008 | La Vall d'Uixó , | Clay | Leticia Costas | 6–2, 6–1
row 2 : Runner-up | 14 December 2009 | Vinaròs , Spain | Clay | Garbiñe Muguruza | 2–6, 0–3, ret
row 3 : Runner-up | 5 April 2010 | Hvar , Croatia | Clay | Mădălina Gojnea | 4–6, 4–6
row 4 : Winner | 18 April 2011 | Hvar , Croatia | Clay | Donna Vekić | 7–5, 7–6 (7–2)
row 5 : Runner-up | 22 July 2013 | Austin, Texas , United States | Hard | Lauren Albanese | 5–7, 7–5, 6–7 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What is the score in the final of the tournament with a hard surface?

Answer: 5–7, 7–5, 6–7
[Table] header: Outcome | Date | Tournament | Surface | Opponent in the final | Score in the final row 1 : Winner | 24 November 2008 | La Vall d'Uixó , | Clay | Leticia Costas | 6–2, 6–1
row 2 : Runner-up | 14 December 2009 | Vinaròs , Spain | Clay | Garbiñe Muguruza | 2–6, 0–3, ret
row 3 : Runner-up | 5 April 2010 | Hvar , Croatia | Clay | Mădălina Gojnea | 4–6, 4–6
row 4 : Winner | 18 April 2011 | Hvar , Croatia | Clay | Donna Vekić | 7–5, 7–6 (7–2)
row 5 : Runner-up | 22 July 2013 | Austin, Texas , United States | Hard | Lauren Albanese | 5–7, 7–5, 6–7 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: Who is the opponent in the final on 24 November 2008?

Answer: Leticia Costas
[Table] header: Week | Date | Opponent | Result | Attendance row 1 : 1 | September 12, 2004 | Seattle Seahawks | L 21-7 | 64,900
row 2 : 2 | September 19, 2004 | San Francisco 49ers | W 30-27 | 64,900
row 3 : 3 | September 26, 2004 | at St. Louis Rams | W 28-25 | 65,856
row 4 : 4 | October 3, 2004 | at Arizona Cardinals | L 34-10 | 28,109
row 5 : 5 | October 10, 2004 | Tampa Bay Buccaneers | L 20-17 | 64,900
row 6 : 6 | October 17, 2004 | Minnesota Vikings | L 38-31 | 64,900
row 7 : 7 | October 24, 2004 | at Oakland Raiders | W 31-26 | 45,337
row 8 : 8 | Bye | Bye | Bye | Bye
row 9 : 9 | November 7, 2004 | at San Diego Chargers | L 43-17 | 59,662
row 10 : 10 | November 14, 2004 | Kansas City Chiefs | W 27-20 | 64,900
row 11 : 11 | November 21, 2004 | Denver Broncos | L 34-13 | 64,900
row 12 : 12 | November 28, 2004 | at Atlanta Falcons | L 24-21 | 70,521
row 13 : 13 | December 5, 2004 | Carolina Panthers | L 32-21 | 58,878
row 14 : 14 | December 12, 2004 | at Dallas Cowboys | W 27-13 | 64,056
row 15 : 15 | December 19, 2004 | at Tampa Bay Buccaneers | W 21-17 | 65,075
row 16 : 16 | December 26, 2004 | Atlanta Falcons | W 26-13 | 64,900
row 17 : 17 | January 2, 2005 | at Carolina Panthers | W 21-18 | 73,302 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What is the Opponent at the game with an Attendance of 64,900 in Week prior to 15 with a Result of L 38-31?

Answer: Minnesota Vikings
[Table] header: Week | Date | Opponent | Result | Attendance row 1 : 1 | September 12, 2004 | Seattle Seahawks | L 21-7 | 64,900
row 2 : 2 | September 19, 2004 | San Francisco 49ers | W 30-27 | 64,900
row 3 : 3 | September 26, 2004 | at St. Louis Rams | W 28-25 | 65,856
row 4 : 4 | October 3, 2004 | at Arizona Cardinals | L 34-10 | 28,109
row 5 : 5 | October 10, 2004 | Tampa Bay Buccaneers | L 20-17 | 64,900
row 6 : 6 | October 17, 2004 | Minnesota Vikings | L 38-31 | 64,900
row 7 : 7 | October 24, 2004 | at Oakland Raiders | W 31-26 | 45,337
row 8 : 8 | Bye | Bye | Bye | Bye
row 9 : 9 | November 7, 2004 | at San Diego Chargers | L 43-17 | 59,662
row 10 : 10 | November 14, 2004 | Kansas City Chiefs | W 27-20 | 64,900
row 11 : 11 | November 21, 2004 | Denver Broncos | L 34-13 | 64,900
row 12 : 12 | November 28, 2004 | at Atlanta Falcons | L 24-21 | 70,521
row 13 : 13 | December 5, 2004 | Carolina Panthers | L 32-21 | 58,878
row 14 : 14 | December 12, 2004 | at Dallas Cowboys | W 27-13 | 64,056
row 15 : 15 | December 19, 2004 | at Tampa Bay Buccaneers | W 21-17 | 65,075
row 16 : 16 | December 26, 2004 | Atlanta Falcons | W 26-13 | 64,900
row 17 : 17 | January 2, 2005 | at Carolina Panthers | W 21-18 | 73,302 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What is the Week of the game with an Attendance of 64,900 and a Result of L 34-13?

Answer: 11.0
[Table] header: Week | Date | Opponent | Result | Attendance row 1 : 1 | September 12, 2004 | Seattle Seahawks | L 21-7 | 64,900
row 2 : 2 | September 19, 2004 | San Francisco 49ers | W 30-27 | 64,900
row 3 : 3 | September 26, 2004 | at St. Louis Rams | W 28-25 | 65,856
row 4 : 4 | October 3, 2004 | at Arizona Cardinals | L 34-10 | 28,109
row 5 : 5 | October 10, 2004 | Tampa Bay Buccaneers | L 20-17 | 64,900
row 6 : 6 | October 17, 2004 | Minnesota Vikings | L 38-31 | 64,900
row 7 : 7 | October 24, 2004 | at Oakland Raiders | W 31-26 | 45,337
row 8 : 8 | Bye | Bye | Bye | Bye
row 9 : 9 | November 7, 2004 | at San Diego Chargers | L 43-17 | 59,662
row 10 : 10 | November 14, 2004 | Kansas City Chiefs | W 27-20 | 64,900
row 11 : 11 | November 21, 2004 | Denver Broncos | L 34-13 | 64,900
row 12 : 12 | November 28, 2004 | at Atlanta Falcons | L 24-21 | 70,521
row 13 : 13 | December 5, 2004 | Carolina Panthers | L 32-21 | 58,878
row 14 : 14 | December 12, 2004 | at Dallas Cowboys | W 27-13 | 64,056
row 15 : 15 | December 19, 2004 | at Tampa Bay Buccaneers | W 21-17 | 65,075
row 16 : 16 | December 26, 2004 | Atlanta Falcons | W 26-13 | 64,900
row 17 : 17 | January 2, 2005 | at Carolina Panthers | W 21-18 | 73,302 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What is the Week of the game against Minnesota Vikings?

Answer: 6.0
[Table] header: Week | Date | Opponent | Result | Attendance row 1 : 1 | September 12, 2004 | Seattle Seahawks | L 21-7 | 64,900
row 2 : 2 | September 19, 2004 | San Francisco 49ers | W 30-27 | 64,900
row 3 : 3 | September 26, 2004 | at St. Louis Rams | W 28-25 | 65,856
row 4 : 4 | October 3, 2004 | at Arizona Cardinals | L 34-10 | 28,109
row 5 : 5 | October 10, 2004 | Tampa Bay Buccaneers | L 20-17 | 64,900
row 6 : 6 | October 17, 2004 | Minnesota Vikings | L 38-31 | 64,900
row 7 : 7 | October 24, 2004 | at Oakland Raiders | W 31-26 | 45,337
row 8 : 8 | Bye | Bye | Bye | Bye
row 9 : 9 | November 7, 2004 | at San Diego Chargers | L 43-17 | 59,662
row 10 : 10 | November 14, 2004 | Kansas City Chiefs | W 27-20 | 64,900
row 11 : 11 | November 21, 2004 | Denver Broncos | L 34-13 | 64,900
row 12 : 12 | November 28, 2004 | at Atlanta Falcons | L 24-21 | 70,521
row 13 : 13 | December 5, 2004 | Carolina Panthers | L 32-21 | 58,878
row 14 : 14 | December 12, 2004 | at Dallas Cowboys | W 27-13 | 64,056
row 15 : 15 | December 19, 2004 | at Tampa Bay Buccaneers | W 21-17 | 65,075
row 16 : 16 | December 26, 2004 | Atlanta Falcons | W 26-13 | 64,900
row 17 : 17 | January 2, 2005 | at Carolina Panthers | W 21-18 | 73,302 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What is the Week of the game against Seattle Seahawks?

Answer: 1.0
[Table] header: Name | Position | League Apps | League Goals | FA Cup Apps | FA Cup Goals | League Cup Apps | League Cup Goals | Total Apps | Total Goals row 1 : Sam Allardyce | DF | 37 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 42 | 0
row 2 : David Burke | DF | 31 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 36 | 1
row 3 : Peter Butler | MF | 0 (4) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 (4) | 0
row 4 : Mick Carmody | DF | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 0
row 5 : Graham Cooper | FW | 31 (3) | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 36 (3) | 5
row 6 : David Cowling | MF | 29 (3) | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 33 (3) | 4
row 7 : Brian Cox | GK | 37 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 42 | 0
row 8 : Steve Doyle | MF | 36 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 41 | 2
row 9 : Paul Jones | DF | 23 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 25 | 2
row 10 : Brian Laws | DF | 25 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 30 | 1
row 11 : Mark Lillis | MF | 35 | 13 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 39 | 16
row 12 : Keith Mason | GK | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0
row 13 : Ian Measham | DF | 17 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 17 | 0
row 14 : Daral Pugh | MF | 24 (5) | 1 | 1 (2) | 1 | 1 | 0 | 26 (7) | 2
row 15 : Liam Robinson | FW | 13 (2) | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13 (2) | 1
row 16 : Brian Stanton | MF | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1
row 17 : Steve Stoutt | DF | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 0
row 18 : Dale Tempest | FW | 34 (1) | 15 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 37 (1) | 16
row 19 : Robbie Turner | FW | 0 (2) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 (2) | 0
row 20 : Ian Wadsworth | FW | 0 (1) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 (1) | 0
row 21 : Simon Webster | DF | 16 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 1
row 22 : Phil Wilson | MF | 40 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 45 | 3
row 23 : Julian Winter | MF | 15 (1) | 2 | 0 (1) | 0 | 1 | 0 | 16 (2) | 2 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: Which Total Goals have an FA Cup Goals of 0, and an FA Cup Apps of 3, and a Position of fw?

Answer: 5.0
[Table] header: Year | MISS EARTH | Miss Air (1st Runner-up) | Miss Water (2nd Runner-up) | Miss Fire (3rd Runner-up) row 1 : 2001 | Catharina Svensson | Simone Régis | Margarita Kravtsova | Daniela Stucan
row 2 : 2002 | Džejla Glavović | Winfred Adah Omwakwe | Sladjana Bozovic | Juliana Patricia Drossou
row 3 : 2003 | Dania Prince | Priscila Poleselo | Marianela Zeledón Bolaño | Marta Matyjasik
row 4 : 2004 | Priscilla Meirelles | Murielle Celimene | Stéphanie Lesage | Yanina González
row 5 : 2005 | Alexandra Braun Waldeck | Amell Santana de Jesús | Katarzyna Borowicz | Jovana Marjanovic
row 6 : 2006 | Hil Yesenia Hernández | Amruta Patki | Catherine Untalan | Marianne Puglia
row 7 : 2007 | Jessica Trisko | Pooja Chitgopekar | Silvana Santaella | Ángela Gómez Dur
row 8 : 2008 | Karla Paula Henry | Miriam Odemba | Abigail Elizalde | Tatiane Alves
row 9 : 2009 | Larissa Ramos | Sandra Inez Seifert | Jessica Barboza | Alejandra Echevarria
row 10 : 2010 | Nicole Faria | Viktoria Shchukina | Watsaporn Wattanako | Yeidy Bosques
row 11 : 2011 | Olga Álava | Drielly Bennettone | Athena Mae Imperial | Caroline Medina
row 12 : 2012 | Tereza Fajksová | Stephany Stefanowitz | Osmariel Villalobos | Camilla Brant [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What year was Caroline Medina Miss Fire (3rd Runner-up)?

Answer: 2011.0
[Table] header: Year | MISS EARTH | Miss Air (1st Runner-up) | Miss Water (2nd Runner-up) | Miss Fire (3rd Runner-up) row 1 : 2001 | Catharina Svensson | Simone Régis | Margarita Kravtsova | Daniela Stucan
row 2 : 2002 | Džejla Glavović | Winfred Adah Omwakwe | Sladjana Bozovic | Juliana Patricia Drossou
row 3 : 2003 | Dania Prince | Priscila Poleselo | Marianela Zeledón Bolaño | Marta Matyjasik
row 4 : 2004 | Priscilla Meirelles | Murielle Celimene | Stéphanie Lesage | Yanina González
row 5 : 2005 | Alexandra Braun Waldeck | Amell Santana de Jesús | Katarzyna Borowicz | Jovana Marjanovic
row 6 : 2006 | Hil Yesenia Hernández | Amruta Patki | Catherine Untalan | Marianne Puglia
row 7 : 2007 | Jessica Trisko | Pooja Chitgopekar | Silvana Santaella | Ángela Gómez Dur
row 8 : 2008 | Karla Paula Henry | Miriam Odemba | Abigail Elizalde | Tatiane Alves
row 9 : 2009 | Larissa Ramos | Sandra Inez Seifert | Jessica Barboza | Alejandra Echevarria
row 10 : 2010 | Nicole Faria | Viktoria Shchukina | Watsaporn Wattanako | Yeidy Bosques
row 11 : 2011 | Olga Álava | Drielly Bennettone | Athena Mae Imperial | Caroline Medina
row 12 : 2012 | Tereza Fajksová | Stephany Stefanowitz | Osmariel Villalobos | Camilla Brant [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: Who won Miss Air (1st Runner-up) when Catherine Untalan was Miss Water (2nd Runner-up) earlier than 2007?

Answer: Amruta Patki
[Table] header: Name | Years | A-League | Finals | Total | Games per goal row 1 : Archie Thompson | 2005/06 - | 61 (149) | 8 (11) | 70 (170) | 2.43
row 2 : Danny Allsopp | 2005/06 - 2009 | 39 (110) | 3 (7) | 46 (128) | 2.72
row 3 : Carlos Hernández | 2007/08 - 2011/12 | 33 (114) | 3 (9) | 38 (134) | 3.53
row 4 : Kevin Muscat | 2005/06 - 2010/2011 | 28 (113) | 0 (9) | 34 (138) | 4.00
row 5 : Robbie Kruse | 2009/10 - 2010/2011 | 15 (36) | 1 (3) | 16 (47) | 2.88
row 6 : Marco Rojas | 2011/12 - 2012/13 | 14 (49) | 0 (2) | 14 (51) | 3.64
row 7 : Mark Milligan | 2011/12 - | 9 (30) | 1 (2) | 10 (32) | 3.20
row 8 : Tom Pondeljak | 2008/09 - 2011/2012 | 7 (72) | 1 (6) | 9 (86) | 9.56
row 9 : Rodrigo Vargas | 2006/07 - 2011/2012 | 7 (129) | 0 (10) | 9 (153) | 17.00
row 10 : Harry Kewell | 2011/2012 | 8 (24) | 0 (0) | 8 (24) | 3.00
row 11 : Mate Dugandzic | 2009/2010 - 2010/2011 | 7 (36) | 0 (1) | 8 (40) | 4.88 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: Which player from A-League 39 (110) has the highest games per goal?

Answer: 2.72
[Table] header: Name | Years | A-League | Finals | Total | Games per goal row 1 : Archie Thompson | 2005/06 - | 61 (149) | 8 (11) | 70 (170) | 2.43
row 2 : Danny Allsopp | 2005/06 - 2009 | 39 (110) | 3 (7) | 46 (128) | 2.72
row 3 : Carlos Hernández | 2007/08 - 2011/12 | 33 (114) | 3 (9) | 38 (134) | 3.53
row 4 : Kevin Muscat | 2005/06 - 2010/2011 | 28 (113) | 0 (9) | 34 (138) | 4.00
row 5 : Robbie Kruse | 2009/10 - 2010/2011 | 15 (36) | 1 (3) | 16 (47) | 2.88
row 6 : Marco Rojas | 2011/12 - 2012/13 | 14 (49) | 0 (2) | 14 (51) | 3.64
row 7 : Mark Milligan | 2011/12 - | 9 (30) | 1 (2) | 10 (32) | 3.20
row 8 : Tom Pondeljak | 2008/09 - 2011/2012 | 7 (72) | 1 (6) | 9 (86) | 9.56
row 9 : Rodrigo Vargas | 2006/07 - 2011/2012 | 7 (129) | 0 (10) | 9 (153) | 17.00
row 10 : Harry Kewell | 2011/2012 | 8 (24) | 0 (0) | 8 (24) | 3.00
row 11 : Mate Dugandzic | 2009/2010 - 2010/2011 | 7 (36) | 0 (1) | 8 (40) | 4.88 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What player had a finals score of 0 (10)?

Answer: Rodrigo Vargas
[Table] header: Name | Years | A-League | Finals | Total | Games per goal row 1 : Archie Thompson | 2005/06 - | 61 (149) | 8 (11) | 70 (170) | 2.43
row 2 : Danny Allsopp | 2005/06 - 2009 | 39 (110) | 3 (7) | 46 (128) | 2.72
row 3 : Carlos Hernández | 2007/08 - 2011/12 | 33 (114) | 3 (9) | 38 (134) | 3.53
row 4 : Kevin Muscat | 2005/06 - 2010/2011 | 28 (113) | 0 (9) | 34 (138) | 4.00
row 5 : Robbie Kruse | 2009/10 - 2010/2011 | 15 (36) | 1 (3) | 16 (47) | 2.88
row 6 : Marco Rojas | 2011/12 - 2012/13 | 14 (49) | 0 (2) | 14 (51) | 3.64
row 7 : Mark Milligan | 2011/12 - | 9 (30) | 1 (2) | 10 (32) | 3.20
row 8 : Tom Pondeljak | 2008/09 - 2011/2012 | 7 (72) | 1 (6) | 9 (86) | 9.56
row 9 : Rodrigo Vargas | 2006/07 - 2011/2012 | 7 (129) | 0 (10) | 9 (153) | 17.00
row 10 : Harry Kewell | 2011/2012 | 8 (24) | 0 (0) | 8 (24) | 3.00
row 11 : Mate Dugandzic | 2009/2010 - 2010/2011 | 7 (36) | 0 (1) | 8 (40) | 4.88 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: Which player has a total of 8 (24)?

Answer: Harry Kewell
[Table] header: Week | Date | Opponent | Result | Attendance row 1 : 1 | September 16, 1962 | Pittsburgh Steelers | W 45-7 | 46,641
row 2 : 2 | September 23, 1962 | San Francisco 49ers | W 45-24 | 51,032
row 3 : 3 | September 30, 1962 | at Baltimore Colts | W 29-20 | 57,966
row 4 : 4 | October 7, 1962 | at Green Bay Packers | L 9-7 | 38,669
row 5 : 5 | October 14, 1962 | Los Angeles Rams | W 13-10 | 53,714
row 6 : 6 | October 21, 1962 | at New York Giants | L 17-14 | 62,856
row 7 : 7 | October 28, 1962 | Chicago Bears | W 11-3 | 53,342
row 8 : 8 | November 4, 1962 | at Los Angeles Rams | W 12-3 | 44,241
row 9 : 9 | November 11, 1962 | at San Francisco 49ers | W 38-24 | 43,449
row 10 : 10 | November 18, 1962 | at Minnesota Vikings | W 17-6 | 31,257
row 11 : 11 | November 22, 1962 | Green Bay Packers | W 26-14 | 57,598
row 12 : 12 | December 2, 1962 | Baltimore Colts | W 21-14 | 53,012
row 13 : 13 | December 9, 1962 | Minnesota Vikings | W 37-23 | 42,256
row 14 : 14 | December 16, 1962 | at Chicago Bears | L 3-0 | 44,948 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What's the week when the result was W 38-24 and attendance was less than 43,449?

Answer: none
[Table] header: Week | Date | Opponent | Result | Attendance row 1 : 1 | September 16, 1962 | Pittsburgh Steelers | W 45-7 | 46,641
row 2 : 2 | September 23, 1962 | San Francisco 49ers | W 45-24 | 51,032
row 3 : 3 | September 30, 1962 | at Baltimore Colts | W 29-20 | 57,966
row 4 : 4 | October 7, 1962 | at Green Bay Packers | L 9-7 | 38,669
row 5 : 5 | October 14, 1962 | Los Angeles Rams | W 13-10 | 53,714
row 6 : 6 | October 21, 1962 | at New York Giants | L 17-14 | 62,856
row 7 : 7 | October 28, 1962 | Chicago Bears | W 11-3 | 53,342
row 8 : 8 | November 4, 1962 | at Los Angeles Rams | W 12-3 | 44,241
row 9 : 9 | November 11, 1962 | at San Francisco 49ers | W 38-24 | 43,449
row 10 : 10 | November 18, 1962 | at Minnesota Vikings | W 17-6 | 31,257
row 11 : 11 | November 22, 1962 | Green Bay Packers | W 26-14 | 57,598
row 12 : 12 | December 2, 1962 | Baltimore Colts | W 21-14 | 53,012
row 13 : 13 | December 9, 1962 | Minnesota Vikings | W 37-23 | 42,256
row 14 : 14 | December 16, 1962 | at Chicago Bears | L 3-0 | 44,948 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What's the week when the Green Bay Packers were the opponent and less than 57,966 were in attendance?

Answer: 1.0
[Table] header: Protocol | Power Line | Radio-Frequency | Open Source? | Needs Neutral Wire? row 1 : C-Bus | no | yes | yes | no (uses category-5 UTP)
row 2 : Insteon | yes | yes | yes | Usually
row 3 : KNX | yes | yes | yes | no [ citation needed ]
row 4 : UPB | yes | no | no | no
row 5 : X10 | yes | yes | yes | no
row 6 : Zigbee | no | yes | yes | no [ citation needed ]
row 7 : Z-Wave | no | yes | no | Usually Z-wave list that need Netural [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: Does it need neutral wire when the power line and open source are no?

Answer: Usually Z-wave list that need Netural
[Table] header: Protocol | Power Line | Radio-Frequency | Open Source? | Needs Neutral Wire? row 1 : C-Bus | no | yes | yes | no (uses category-5 UTP)
row 2 : Insteon | yes | yes | yes | Usually
row 3 : KNX | yes | yes | yes | no [ citation needed ]
row 4 : UPB | yes | no | no | no
row 5 : X10 | yes | yes | yes | no
row 6 : Zigbee | no | yes | yes | no [ citation needed ]
row 7 : Z-Wave | no | yes | no | Usually Z-wave list that need Netural [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: Does Zigbee need neutral wire when the open source is yes?

Answer: no [ citation needed ]
[Table] header: Protocol | Power Line | Radio-Frequency | Open Source? | Needs Neutral Wire? row 1 : C-Bus | no | yes | yes | no (uses category-5 UTP)
row 2 : Insteon | yes | yes | yes | Usually
row 3 : KNX | yes | yes | yes | no [ citation needed ]
row 4 : UPB | yes | no | no | no
row 5 : X10 | yes | yes | yes | no
row 6 : Zigbee | no | yes | yes | no [ citation needed ]
row 7 : Z-Wave | no | yes | no | Usually Z-wave list that need Netural [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What's the open source of X10 that no neutral wire needed?

Answer: yes
[Table] header: Res. | Record | Opponent | Method | Event | Round | Time | Location row 1 : Win | 7–0 | Liz Carmouche | Submission (armbar) | UFC 157 | 1 | 4:49 | Anaheim, California , United States
row 2 : Win | 6–0 | Sarah Kaufman | Submission (armbar) | Strikeforce: Rousey vs | 1 | 0:54 | San Diego, California , United States
row 3 : Win | 5–0 | Miesha Tate | Submission (armbar) | Strikeforce: Tate vs. | 1 | 4:27 | Columbus, Ohio , United States
row 4 : Win | 4–0 | Julia Budd | Submission (armbar) | Strikeforce Challengers 20 | 1 | 0:39 | Las Vegas, Nevada , United States
row 5 : Win | 3–0 | Sarah D'Alelio | Submission (armbar) | Strikeforce Challengers 18 | 1 | 0:25 | Las Vegas, Nevada , United States
row 6 : Win | 2–0 | Charmaine Tweet | Submission (armbar) | HKFC - School of Hard Knock | 1 | 0:49 | Calgary, Alberta , Canada
row 7 : Win | 1–0 | Ediane Gomes | Submission (armbar) | KOTC - Turning Point | 1 | 0:25 | Tarzana, California , United States [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What round had a time of 0:39?

Answer: 1.0
[Table] header: Year | Competition Description | Location | Apparatus | Rank-Final | Score-Final | Rank-Qualifying | Score-Qualifying row 1 : 2012 | Olympics | London | All-around | 1st | 116.900 | 1st | 116.000
row 2 : 2012 | Olympics | London | Ball | 1st | 29.200 | 1st | 29.525
row 3 : 2012 | Olympics | London | Ribbon | 2nd | 28.900 | 1st | 29.400
row 4 : 2012 | Olympics | London | Hoop | 1st | 29.350 | 2nd | 28.100
row 5 : 2012 | Olympics | London | Clubs | 1st | 29.450 | 1st | 28.975 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What was the location of the competition with a Rank-Final of 1st and a Score-Qualifying under 28.975?

Answer: London
[Table] header: Year | Competition Description | Location | Apparatus | Rank-Final | Score-Final | Rank-Qualifying | Score-Qualifying row 1 : 2012 | Olympics | London | All-around | 1st | 116.900 | 1st | 116.000
row 2 : 2012 | Olympics | London | Ball | 1st | 29.200 | 1st | 29.525
row 3 : 2012 | Olympics | London | Ribbon | 2nd | 28.900 | 1st | 29.400
row 4 : 2012 | Olympics | London | Hoop | 1st | 29.350 | 2nd | 28.100
row 5 : 2012 | Olympics | London | Clubs | 1st | 29.450 | 1st | 28.975 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What competition had a Rank-Qualifying of 1st and a ball apparatus?

Answer: Olympics
[Table] header: Date | Ship | Nationality | Tonnage | Fate row 1 : 16 May 1941 | Llangibby Castle | Great Britain | 11,951 | Damaged
row 2 : 13 April 1942 | Empire Progress | Great Britain | 5,249 | Sunk
row 3 : 30 April 1942 | Ashkhabad | Soviet Union | 5,284 | Sunk
row 4 : 2 May 1942 | USS Cythera | USA | 602 | Sunk
row 5 : 2 November 1942 | Dalcroy | Great Britain | 4,558 | Sunk
row 6 : 2 November 1942 | Empire Antelope | Great Britain | 4,945 | Sunk
row 7 : 2 November 1942 | Empire Leopard | Great Britain | 5,676 | Sunk
row 8 : 2 November 1942 | Empire Sunrise | Great Britain | 7,459 | Damaged
row 9 : 2 November 1942 | Rinos | Greece | 4,649 | Sunk
row 10 : 7 February 1942 | Afrika | Great Britain | 8,597 | Sunk
row 11 : 7 February 1942 | Daghild | Norway | 9,272 | Damaged
row 12 : 7 February 1942 | Henry R. Mallory | USA | 6,063 | Sunk
row 13 : 7 February 1942 | Kalliopi | Greece | 4,695 | Sunk
row 14 : 7 February 1942 | Robert E. Hopkins | Great Britain | 6,625 | Sunk
row 15 : 7 February 1942 | Toward | Great Britain | 1,571 | Sunk
row 16 : 8 February 1942 | Newton Ash | Great Britain | 1,571 | Sunk
row 17 : 11 May 1943 | Antigone | Great Britain | 4,545 | Sunk
row 18 : 11 May 1943 | Grado | Norway | 3,082 | Sunk [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What is the date for the ship Afrika, with nationality Great Britain?

Answer: 7 February 1942
[Table] header: Date | Ship | Nationality | Tonnage | Fate row 1 : 16 May 1941 | Llangibby Castle | Great Britain | 11,951 | Damaged
row 2 : 13 April 1942 | Empire Progress | Great Britain | 5,249 | Sunk
row 3 : 30 April 1942 | Ashkhabad | Soviet Union | 5,284 | Sunk
row 4 : 2 May 1942 | USS Cythera | USA | 602 | Sunk
row 5 : 2 November 1942 | Dalcroy | Great Britain | 4,558 | Sunk
row 6 : 2 November 1942 | Empire Antelope | Great Britain | 4,945 | Sunk
row 7 : 2 November 1942 | Empire Leopard | Great Britain | 5,676 | Sunk
row 8 : 2 November 1942 | Empire Sunrise | Great Britain | 7,459 | Damaged
row 9 : 2 November 1942 | Rinos | Greece | 4,649 | Sunk
row 10 : 7 February 1942 | Afrika | Great Britain | 8,597 | Sunk
row 11 : 7 February 1942 | Daghild | Norway | 9,272 | Damaged
row 12 : 7 February 1942 | Henry R. Mallory | USA | 6,063 | Sunk
row 13 : 7 February 1942 | Kalliopi | Greece | 4,695 | Sunk
row 14 : 7 February 1942 | Robert E. Hopkins | Great Britain | 6,625 | Sunk
row 15 : 7 February 1942 | Toward | Great Britain | 1,571 | Sunk
row 16 : 8 February 1942 | Newton Ash | Great Britain | 1,571 | Sunk
row 17 : 11 May 1943 | Antigone | Great Britain | 4,545 | Sunk
row 18 : 11 May 1943 | Grado | Norway | 3,082 | Sunk [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What is the highest tonnage for a ship from Great Britain named Newton Ash?

Answer: 1571.0
[Table] header: Date | Ship | Nationality | Tonnage | Fate row 1 : 16 May 1941 | Llangibby Castle | Great Britain | 11,951 | Damaged
row 2 : 13 April 1942 | Empire Progress | Great Britain | 5,249 | Sunk
row 3 : 30 April 1942 | Ashkhabad | Soviet Union | 5,284 | Sunk
row 4 : 2 May 1942 | USS Cythera | USA | 602 | Sunk
row 5 : 2 November 1942 | Dalcroy | Great Britain | 4,558 | Sunk
row 6 : 2 November 1942 | Empire Antelope | Great Britain | 4,945 | Sunk
row 7 : 2 November 1942 | Empire Leopard | Great Britain | 5,676 | Sunk
row 8 : 2 November 1942 | Empire Sunrise | Great Britain | 7,459 | Damaged
row 9 : 2 November 1942 | Rinos | Greece | 4,649 | Sunk
row 10 : 7 February 1942 | Afrika | Great Britain | 8,597 | Sunk
row 11 : 7 February 1942 | Daghild | Norway | 9,272 | Damaged
row 12 : 7 February 1942 | Henry R. Mallory | USA | 6,063 | Sunk
row 13 : 7 February 1942 | Kalliopi | Greece | 4,695 | Sunk
row 14 : 7 February 1942 | Robert E. Hopkins | Great Britain | 6,625 | Sunk
row 15 : 7 February 1942 | Toward | Great Britain | 1,571 | Sunk
row 16 : 8 February 1942 | Newton Ash | Great Britain | 1,571 | Sunk
row 17 : 11 May 1943 | Antigone | Great Britain | 4,545 | Sunk
row 18 : 11 May 1943 | Grado | Norway | 3,082 | Sunk [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What was the nationality of the ship named Toward?

Answer: Great Britain
[Table] header: Date | Ship | Nationality | Tonnage | Fate row 1 : 16 May 1941 | Llangibby Castle | Great Britain | 11,951 | Damaged
row 2 : 13 April 1942 | Empire Progress | Great Britain | 5,249 | Sunk
row 3 : 30 April 1942 | Ashkhabad | Soviet Union | 5,284 | Sunk
row 4 : 2 May 1942 | USS Cythera | USA | 602 | Sunk
row 5 : 2 November 1942 | Dalcroy | Great Britain | 4,558 | Sunk
row 6 : 2 November 1942 | Empire Antelope | Great Britain | 4,945 | Sunk
row 7 : 2 November 1942 | Empire Leopard | Great Britain | 5,676 | Sunk
row 8 : 2 November 1942 | Empire Sunrise | Great Britain | 7,459 | Damaged
row 9 : 2 November 1942 | Rinos | Greece | 4,649 | Sunk
row 10 : 7 February 1942 | Afrika | Great Britain | 8,597 | Sunk
row 11 : 7 February 1942 | Daghild | Norway | 9,272 | Damaged
row 12 : 7 February 1942 | Henry R. Mallory | USA | 6,063 | Sunk
row 13 : 7 February 1942 | Kalliopi | Greece | 4,695 | Sunk
row 14 : 7 February 1942 | Robert E. Hopkins | Great Britain | 6,625 | Sunk
row 15 : 7 February 1942 | Toward | Great Britain | 1,571 | Sunk
row 16 : 8 February 1942 | Newton Ash | Great Britain | 1,571 | Sunk
row 17 : 11 May 1943 | Antigone | Great Britain | 4,545 | Sunk
row 18 : 11 May 1943 | Grado | Norway | 3,082 | Sunk [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What was the nationality of the sunk ship named Rinos?

Answer: Greece
[Table] header: Score | Shooter | Date | Comp | Place row 1 : 485.5 | Anke Völker ( GDR ) | 1986 | WCH | Suhl , East Germany
row 2 : 489.0 | Jasna Brajković ( | 1987 | WCH | Budapest , Hungary
row 3 : 489.5 | Jasna Šekarić | 1988 | OG | Seoul , South Korea
row 4 : New targets from 1989 | New targets from 1989 | New targets from 1989 | New targets from 1989 | New targets from 1989
row 5 : 488.8 | Svetlana Smirnova (  | 1989 | ECH | Copenhagen , Denmark
row 6 : 492.4 | Liselotte Breker ( FRG  | 1989 | WC | Zagreb , Yugoslavia
row 7 : 492.7 | Jasna Šekarić | 1996 | WCF | Näfels , Switzerland
row 8 : 493.0 | Svetlana Smirnova ( R | 23 May 1998 | WC | Munich , Germany
row 9 : 493.5 | Ren Jie ( CHN ) | 22 May 1999 | WC | Munich , Germany [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What is the Comp of the Shooter with a Score of 489.5?

Answer: OG
[Table] header: Score | Shooter | Date | Comp | Place row 1 : 485.5 | Anke Völker ( GDR ) | 1986 | WCH | Suhl , East Germany
row 2 : 489.0 | Jasna Brajković ( | 1987 | WCH | Budapest , Hungary
row 3 : 489.5 | Jasna Šekarić | 1988 | OG | Seoul , South Korea
row 4 : New targets from 1989 | New targets from 1989 | New targets from 1989 | New targets from 1989 | New targets from 1989
row 5 : 488.8 | Svetlana Smirnova (  | 1989 | ECH | Copenhagen , Denmark
row 6 : 492.4 | Liselotte Breker ( FRG  | 1989 | WC | Zagreb , Yugoslavia
row 7 : 492.7 | Jasna Šekarić | 1996 | WCF | Näfels , Switzerland
row 8 : 493.0 | Svetlana Smirnova ( R | 23 May 1998 | WC | Munich , Germany
row 9 : 493.5 | Ren Jie ( CHN ) | 22 May 1999 | WC | Munich , Germany [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What is the Date of Shooter New Targets from 1989's record?

Answer: New targets from 1989
[Table] header: Rank | Nation | Gold | Silver | Bronze | Total row 1 : 1 | Hungary | 6 | 2 | 8 | 16
row 2 : 2 | Russia | 8 | 3 | 2 | 13
row 3 : 3 | Poland | 3 | 4 | 4 | 11
row 4 : 4 | Germany | 2 | 4 | 5 | 11
row 5 : 5 | Canada | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4
row 6 : 6 | Czech Republic | 0 | 3 | 1 | 4
row 7 : 7 | Romania | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4
row 8 : 8 | Italy | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3
row 9 : 9 | Australia | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2
row 10 : 10 | Slovakia | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2
row 11 : 11 | Israel | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1
row 12 : 12 | Spain | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1
row 13 : 13 | Bulgaria | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1
row 14 : 14 | Cuba | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1
row 15 : 15 | Norway | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1
row 16 : 16 | Ukraine | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1
row 17 : 17 | Denmark | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1
row 18 : 18 | France | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1
row 19 : Total | Total | 26 | 26 | 26 | 78 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What is the average total value for Spain?

Answer: 1.0
[Table] header: Rank | Nation | Gold | Silver | Bronze | Total row 1 : 1 | Hungary | 6 | 2 | 8 | 16
row 2 : 2 | Russia | 8 | 3 | 2 | 13
row 3 : 3 | Poland | 3 | 4 | 4 | 11
row 4 : 4 | Germany | 2 | 4 | 5 | 11
row 5 : 5 | Canada | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4
row 6 : 6 | Czech Republic | 0 | 3 | 1 | 4
row 7 : 7 | Romania | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4
row 8 : 8 | Italy | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3
row 9 : 9 | Australia | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2
row 10 : 10 | Slovakia | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2
row 11 : 11 | Israel | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1
row 12 : 12 | Spain | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1
row 13 : 13 | Bulgaria | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1
row 14 : 14 | Cuba | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1
row 15 : 15 | Norway | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1
row 16 : 16 | Ukraine | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1
row 17 : 17 | Denmark | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1
row 18 : 18 | France | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1
row 19 : Total | Total | 26 | 26 | 26 | 78 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What is the sum of silvers for countries in rank 8 with totals over 3?

Answer: none
[Table] header: Rank | Nation | Gold | Silver | Bronze | Total row 1 : 1 | Hungary | 6 | 2 | 8 | 16
row 2 : 2 | Russia | 8 | 3 | 2 | 13
row 3 : 3 | Poland | 3 | 4 | 4 | 11
row 4 : 4 | Germany | 2 | 4 | 5 | 11
row 5 : 5 | Canada | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4
row 6 : 6 | Czech Republic | 0 | 3 | 1 | 4
row 7 : 7 | Romania | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4
row 8 : 8 | Italy | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3
row 9 : 9 | Australia | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2
row 10 : 10 | Slovakia | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2
row 11 : 11 | Israel | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1
row 12 : 12 | Spain | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1
row 13 : 13 | Bulgaria | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1
row 14 : 14 | Cuba | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1
row 15 : 15 | Norway | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1
row 16 : 16 | Ukraine | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1
row 17 : 17 | Denmark | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1
row 18 : 18 | France | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1
row 19 : Total | Total | 26 | 26 | 26 | 78 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What is the average total for countries with under 3 golds and 0 silvers?

Answer: none