sail/symbolic-instruction-tuning huggingface dataset:
[Table] header: Game | Date | Opponent | Score | High points | High rebounds | High assists | Location | Record row 1 : 15 | July 7 | @ New York | L 79-89 | Whalen (24) | McWilliams-Frankl | Whalen (5) | Madison Square Garden | 12-3
row 2 : 16 | July 13 | @ Indiana | L 53-64 | Sales (15) | Douglas (7) | Whalen (4) | Conseco Fieldhouse | 12-4
row 3 : 17 | July 15 | Houston | W 70-66 | Sales (22) | Dydek (7) | Whalen (5) | Mohegan Sun Arena | 13-4
row 4 : 18 | July 17 | @ Minnesota | W 72-53 | Dydek (17) | Dydek (8) | Douglas , Dydek (4) | Target Center | 14-4
row 5 : 19 | July 19 | @ Charlotte | W 64-55 | Douglas (15) | Dydek (11) | Whalen (6) | Charlotte Bobcats Arena | 15-4
row 6 : 20 | July 20 | @ Detroit | L 57-66 | Sales (17) | McWilliams-Frankl | Sales , Whalen , Wyckoff | Palace of Auburn Hills | 15-5
row 7 : 21 | July 22 | Charlotte | W 73-63 | Sales (21) | Sales (8) | Whalen (7) | Mohegan Sun Arena | 16-5
row 8 : 22 | July 26 | Indiana | W 68-55 | Sales (19) | Dydek (12) | Whalen (5) | Mohegan Sun Arena | 17-5
row 9 : 23 | July 28 | New York | W 73-70 | Sales (21) | Douglas , Jones , McWilli | Whalen (6) | Mohegan Sun Arena | 18-5
row 10 : 24 | July 30 | Detroit | L 66-75 | Dydek (16) | Dydek (9) | Douglas (4) | Mohegan Sun Arena | 18-6 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: Which Score has High points of douglas (15)?

Answer: W 64-55
[Table] header: Game | Date | Opponent | Score | High points | High rebounds | High assists | Location | Record row 1 : 15 | July 7 | @ New York | L 79-89 | Whalen (24) | McWilliams-Frankl | Whalen (5) | Madison Square Garden | 12-3
row 2 : 16 | July 13 | @ Indiana | L 53-64 | Sales (15) | Douglas (7) | Whalen (4) | Conseco Fieldhouse | 12-4
row 3 : 17 | July 15 | Houston | W 70-66 | Sales (22) | Dydek (7) | Whalen (5) | Mohegan Sun Arena | 13-4
row 4 : 18 | July 17 | @ Minnesota | W 72-53 | Dydek (17) | Dydek (8) | Douglas , Dydek (4) | Target Center | 14-4
row 5 : 19 | July 19 | @ Charlotte | W 64-55 | Douglas (15) | Dydek (11) | Whalen (6) | Charlotte Bobcats Arena | 15-4
row 6 : 20 | July 20 | @ Detroit | L 57-66 | Sales (17) | McWilliams-Frankl | Sales , Whalen , Wyckoff | Palace of Auburn Hills | 15-5
row 7 : 21 | July 22 | Charlotte | W 73-63 | Sales (21) | Sales (8) | Whalen (7) | Mohegan Sun Arena | 16-5
row 8 : 22 | July 26 | Indiana | W 68-55 | Sales (19) | Dydek (12) | Whalen (5) | Mohegan Sun Arena | 17-5
row 9 : 23 | July 28 | New York | W 73-70 | Sales (21) | Douglas , Jones , McWilli | Whalen (6) | Mohegan Sun Arena | 18-5
row 10 : 24 | July 30 | Detroit | L 66-75 | Dydek (16) | Dydek (9) | Douglas (4) | Mohegan Sun Arena | 18-6 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: Which High assists have a Game larger than 21, and a Record of 18-6?

Answer: Douglas (4)
[Table] header: Game | Date | Opponent | Score | High points | High rebounds | High assists | Location | Record row 1 : 15 | July 7 | @ New York | L 79-89 | Whalen (24) | McWilliams-Frankl | Whalen (5) | Madison Square Garden | 12-3
row 2 : 16 | July 13 | @ Indiana | L 53-64 | Sales (15) | Douglas (7) | Whalen (4) | Conseco Fieldhouse | 12-4
row 3 : 17 | July 15 | Houston | W 70-66 | Sales (22) | Dydek (7) | Whalen (5) | Mohegan Sun Arena | 13-4
row 4 : 18 | July 17 | @ Minnesota | W 72-53 | Dydek (17) | Dydek (8) | Douglas , Dydek (4) | Target Center | 14-4
row 5 : 19 | July 19 | @ Charlotte | W 64-55 | Douglas (15) | Dydek (11) | Whalen (6) | Charlotte Bobcats Arena | 15-4
row 6 : 20 | July 20 | @ Detroit | L 57-66 | Sales (17) | McWilliams-Frankl | Sales , Whalen , Wyckoff | Palace of Auburn Hills | 15-5
row 7 : 21 | July 22 | Charlotte | W 73-63 | Sales (21) | Sales (8) | Whalen (7) | Mohegan Sun Arena | 16-5
row 8 : 22 | July 26 | Indiana | W 68-55 | Sales (19) | Dydek (12) | Whalen (5) | Mohegan Sun Arena | 17-5
row 9 : 23 | July 28 | New York | W 73-70 | Sales (21) | Douglas , Jones , McWilli | Whalen (6) | Mohegan Sun Arena | 18-5
row 10 : 24 | July 30 | Detroit | L 66-75 | Dydek (16) | Dydek (9) | Douglas (4) | Mohegan Sun Arena | 18-6 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: Which Record has a Location of madison square garden?

Answer: 12-3
[Table] header: Rank | Name | 1st run | 2nd run | 3rd run | Total row 1 : 1 | Māris Štrombergs | 36.485 (1) | 35.969 (1) | 36.071 (1) | 3
row 2 : 2 | Rob van den Wildenberg ( NED ) | 37.277 (3) | 36.360 (2) | 37.496 (4) | 9
row 3 : 3 | Jared Graves ( AUS ) | 36.904 (2) | 39.296 (5) | 37.242 (3) | 10
row 4 : 4 | Damien Godet ( FRA ) | 37.410 (4) | 36.707 (4) | 37.805 (6) | 14
row 5 : 5 | Cristian Becerine ( ARG ) | 37.480 (5) | DNF (8) | 37.079 (2) | 15
row 6 : 6 | Kamakazi ( AUS ) | 42.551 (7) | 41.256 (6) | 37.497 (5) | 18
row 7 : 7 | Roger Rinderknecht ( SUI  | DNF (8) | 36.610 (3) | 48.734 (8) | 19
row 8 : 8 | Manuel de Vecchi ( ITA ) | 38.018 (6) | 42.148 (7) | 38.208 (7) | 20 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: For what total was 37.410 (4) the 1st run?

Answer: 14.0
[Table] header: Rank | Name | 1st run | 2nd run | 3rd run | Total row 1 : 1 | Māris Štrombergs | 36.485 (1) | 35.969 (1) | 36.071 (1) | 3
row 2 : 2 | Rob van den Wildenberg ( NED ) | 37.277 (3) | 36.360 (2) | 37.496 (4) | 9
row 3 : 3 | Jared Graves ( AUS ) | 36.904 (2) | 39.296 (5) | 37.242 (3) | 10
row 4 : 4 | Damien Godet ( FRA ) | 37.410 (4) | 36.707 (4) | 37.805 (6) | 14
row 5 : 5 | Cristian Becerine ( ARG ) | 37.480 (5) | DNF (8) | 37.079 (2) | 15
row 6 : 6 | Kamakazi ( AUS ) | 42.551 (7) | 41.256 (6) | 37.497 (5) | 18
row 7 : 7 | Roger Rinderknecht ( SUI  | DNF (8) | 36.610 (3) | 48.734 (8) | 19
row 8 : 8 | Manuel de Vecchi ( ITA ) | 38.018 (6) | 42.148 (7) | 38.208 (7) | 20 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: Who had a 2nd run of 39.296 (5)?

Answer: Jared Graves ( AUS )
[Table] header: Rank | Name | 1st run | 2nd run | 3rd run | Total row 1 : 1 | Māris Štrombergs | 36.485 (1) | 35.969 (1) | 36.071 (1) | 3
row 2 : 2 | Rob van den Wildenberg ( NED ) | 37.277 (3) | 36.360 (2) | 37.496 (4) | 9
row 3 : 3 | Jared Graves ( AUS ) | 36.904 (2) | 39.296 (5) | 37.242 (3) | 10
row 4 : 4 | Damien Godet ( FRA ) | 37.410 (4) | 36.707 (4) | 37.805 (6) | 14
row 5 : 5 | Cristian Becerine ( ARG ) | 37.480 (5) | DNF (8) | 37.079 (2) | 15
row 6 : 6 | Kamakazi ( AUS ) | 42.551 (7) | 41.256 (6) | 37.497 (5) | 18
row 7 : 7 | Roger Rinderknecht ( SUI  | DNF (8) | 36.610 (3) | 48.734 (8) | 19
row 8 : 8 | Manuel de Vecchi ( ITA ) | 38.018 (6) | 42.148 (7) | 38.208 (7) | 20 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What is the greatest total when the 3rd run was 48.734 (8)?

Answer: 19.0
[Table] header: Rank | Name | 1st run | 2nd run | 3rd run | Total row 1 : 1 | Māris Štrombergs | 36.485 (1) | 35.969 (1) | 36.071 (1) | 3
row 2 : 2 | Rob van den Wildenberg ( NED ) | 37.277 (3) | 36.360 (2) | 37.496 (4) | 9
row 3 : 3 | Jared Graves ( AUS ) | 36.904 (2) | 39.296 (5) | 37.242 (3) | 10
row 4 : 4 | Damien Godet ( FRA ) | 37.410 (4) | 36.707 (4) | 37.805 (6) | 14
row 5 : 5 | Cristian Becerine ( ARG ) | 37.480 (5) | DNF (8) | 37.079 (2) | 15
row 6 : 6 | Kamakazi ( AUS ) | 42.551 (7) | 41.256 (6) | 37.497 (5) | 18
row 7 : 7 | Roger Rinderknecht ( SUI  | DNF (8) | 36.610 (3) | 48.734 (8) | 19
row 8 : 8 | Manuel de Vecchi ( ITA ) | 38.018 (6) | 42.148 (7) | 38.208 (7) | 20 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What is the 3rd run was 41.256 (6) the 2nd run?

Answer: 37.497 (5)
[Table] header: Rank | Name | 1st run | 2nd run | 3rd run | Total row 1 : 1 | Māris Štrombergs | 36.485 (1) | 35.969 (1) | 36.071 (1) | 3
row 2 : 2 | Rob van den Wildenberg ( NED ) | 37.277 (3) | 36.360 (2) | 37.496 (4) | 9
row 3 : 3 | Jared Graves ( AUS ) | 36.904 (2) | 39.296 (5) | 37.242 (3) | 10
row 4 : 4 | Damien Godet ( FRA ) | 37.410 (4) | 36.707 (4) | 37.805 (6) | 14
row 5 : 5 | Cristian Becerine ( ARG ) | 37.480 (5) | DNF (8) | 37.079 (2) | 15
row 6 : 6 | Kamakazi ( AUS ) | 42.551 (7) | 41.256 (6) | 37.497 (5) | 18
row 7 : 7 | Roger Rinderknecht ( SUI  | DNF (8) | 36.610 (3) | 48.734 (8) | 19
row 8 : 8 | Manuel de Vecchi ( ITA ) | 38.018 (6) | 42.148 (7) | 38.208 (7) | 20 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: With a 3rd run of 37.805 (6), what was the 1st run?

Answer: 37.410 (4)
[Table] header: Rank | Name | 1st run | 2nd run | 3rd run | Total row 1 : 1 | Māris Štrombergs | 36.485 (1) | 35.969 (1) | 36.071 (1) | 3
row 2 : 2 | Rob van den Wildenberg ( NED ) | 37.277 (3) | 36.360 (2) | 37.496 (4) | 9
row 3 : 3 | Jared Graves ( AUS ) | 36.904 (2) | 39.296 (5) | 37.242 (3) | 10
row 4 : 4 | Damien Godet ( FRA ) | 37.410 (4) | 36.707 (4) | 37.805 (6) | 14
row 5 : 5 | Cristian Becerine ( ARG ) | 37.480 (5) | DNF (8) | 37.079 (2) | 15
row 6 : 6 | Kamakazi ( AUS ) | 42.551 (7) | 41.256 (6) | 37.497 (5) | 18
row 7 : 7 | Roger Rinderknecht ( SUI  | DNF (8) | 36.610 (3) | 48.734 (8) | 19
row 8 : 8 | Manuel de Vecchi ( ITA ) | 38.018 (6) | 42.148 (7) | 38.208 (7) | 20 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What is the 1st run when 37.496 (4) is the 3rd run?

Answer: 37.277 (3)
[Table] header: 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 row 1 : 30,696 | 29,722 | 29,785 | 28,304 | 27,089
row 2 : 26,986 | 26,452 | 25,795 | 25,616 | 24,473
row 3 : 87.9 | 88.9 | 86.6 | 90.5 | 90.3
row 4 : 9,265 | 9,254 | 9,544 | 9,344 | 9,707
row 5 : 3.42 | 3.41 | 3.39 | 3.38 | 3.41 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: Which 2012 has a 2009 smaller than 3.38?

Answer: none
[Table] header: 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 row 1 : 30,696 | 29,722 | 29,785 | 28,304 | 27,089
row 2 : 26,986 | 26,452 | 25,795 | 25,616 | 24,473
row 3 : 87.9 | 88.9 | 86.6 | 90.5 | 90.3
row 4 : 9,265 | 9,254 | 9,544 | 9,344 | 9,707
row 5 : 3.42 | 3.41 | 3.39 | 3.38 | 3.41 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: Which 2009 has a 2012 larger than 9,265?

Answer: 28304.0
[Table] header: 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 row 1 : 30,696 | 29,722 | 29,785 | 28,304 | 27,089
row 2 : 26,986 | 26,452 | 25,795 | 25,616 | 24,473
row 3 : 87.9 | 88.9 | 86.6 | 90.5 | 90.3
row 4 : 9,265 | 9,254 | 9,544 | 9,344 | 9,707
row 5 : 3.42 | 3.41 | 3.39 | 3.38 | 3.41 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: Which 2012 has a 2008 of 24,473, and a 2009 smaller than 25,616?

Answer: none
[Table] header: 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 row 1 : 30,696 | 29,722 | 29,785 | 28,304 | 27,089
row 2 : 26,986 | 26,452 | 25,795 | 25,616 | 24,473
row 3 : 87.9 | 88.9 | 86.6 | 90.5 | 90.3
row 4 : 9,265 | 9,254 | 9,544 | 9,344 | 9,707
row 5 : 3.42 | 3.41 | 3.39 | 3.38 | 3.41 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: Which 2010 has a 2008 larger than 3.41, and a 2009 smaller than 9,344, and a 2011 smaller than 26,452, and a 2012 smaller than 87.9?

Answer: none
[Table] header: 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 row 1 : 30,696 | 29,722 | 29,785 | 28,304 | 27,089
row 2 : 26,986 | 26,452 | 25,795 | 25,616 | 24,473
row 3 : 87.9 | 88.9 | 86.6 | 90.5 | 90.3
row 4 : 9,265 | 9,254 | 9,544 | 9,344 | 9,707
row 5 : 3.42 | 3.41 | 3.39 | 3.38 | 3.41 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: How much 2012 has a 2011 smaller than 26,452, and a 2009 larger than 3.38, and a 2008 smaller than 90.3?

Answer: 0.0
[Table] header: Year | Champion (average in final) | Legs | Runner-up (average in final) | Sponsor | Prize Fund | Champion | Runner-up | Venue row 1 : 2008 | Phil Taylor (104.35) | 11 – 5 | Adrian Lewis (96.56) | PartyPoker.net | £200,000 | £50,000 | £25,000 | Südbahnhof, Frankfurt
row 2 : 2009 | Phil Taylor (109.35) | 11 – 3 | Steve Beaton (97.16) | PartyPoker.net | £200,000 | £50,000 | £20,000 | Claus Event Center, Hoofddorp
row 3 : 2010 | Phil Taylor (105.74) | 11 – 1 | Wayne Jones (94.64) | PartyPoker.net | £200,000 | £50,000 | £20,000 | Stadthalle Dinslaken, Dinslake
row 4 : 2011 | Phil Taylor (109.29) | 11 – 8 | Adrian Lewis (98.72) | PartyPoker.net | £200,000 | £50,000 | £20,000 | Maritim Hotel, Düsseldorf
row 5 : 2012 | Simon Whitlock (94.91) | 11 – 5 | Wes Newton (89.47) | PartyPoker.net | £200,000 | £50,000 | £20,000 | RWE-Sporthalle, Mülheim
row 6 : 2013 | Adrian Lewis (103.34) | 11 – 6 | Simon Whitlock (99.59) | PartyPoker.net | £200,000 | £50,000 | £20,000 | RWE-Sporthalle, Mülheim [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: who is the champion when the year is earlier than 2012, the runner-up (average in final) is steve beaton (97.16)?

Answer: £50,000
[Table] header: Year | Champion (average in final) | Legs | Runner-up (average in final) | Sponsor | Prize Fund | Champion | Runner-up | Venue row 1 : 2008 | Phil Taylor (104.35) | 11 – 5 | Adrian Lewis (96.56) | PartyPoker.net | £200,000 | £50,000 | £25,000 | Südbahnhof, Frankfurt
row 2 : 2009 | Phil Taylor (109.35) | 11 – 3 | Steve Beaton (97.16) | PartyPoker.net | £200,000 | £50,000 | £20,000 | Claus Event Center, Hoofddorp
row 3 : 2010 | Phil Taylor (105.74) | 11 – 1 | Wayne Jones (94.64) | PartyPoker.net | £200,000 | £50,000 | £20,000 | Stadthalle Dinslaken, Dinslake
row 4 : 2011 | Phil Taylor (109.29) | 11 – 8 | Adrian Lewis (98.72) | PartyPoker.net | £200,000 | £50,000 | £20,000 | Maritim Hotel, Düsseldorf
row 5 : 2012 | Simon Whitlock (94.91) | 11 – 5 | Wes Newton (89.47) | PartyPoker.net | £200,000 | £50,000 | £20,000 | RWE-Sporthalle, Mülheim
row 6 : 2013 | Adrian Lewis (103.34) | 11 – 6 | Simon Whitlock (99.59) | PartyPoker.net | £200,000 | £50,000 | £20,000 | RWE-Sporthalle, Mülheim [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: what is the venue when the runner-up is £20,000, the champion (average in final) is phil taylor (109.35)?

Answer: Claus Event Center, Hoofddorp
[Table] header: Year | Champion (average in final) | Legs | Runner-up (average in final) | Sponsor | Prize Fund | Champion | Runner-up | Venue row 1 : 2008 | Phil Taylor (104.35) | 11 – 5 | Adrian Lewis (96.56) | PartyPoker.net | £200,000 | £50,000 | £25,000 | Südbahnhof, Frankfurt
row 2 : 2009 | Phil Taylor (109.35) | 11 – 3 | Steve Beaton (97.16) | PartyPoker.net | £200,000 | £50,000 | £20,000 | Claus Event Center, Hoofddorp
row 3 : 2010 | Phil Taylor (105.74) | 11 – 1 | Wayne Jones (94.64) | PartyPoker.net | £200,000 | £50,000 | £20,000 | Stadthalle Dinslaken, Dinslake
row 4 : 2011 | Phil Taylor (109.29) | 11 – 8 | Adrian Lewis (98.72) | PartyPoker.net | £200,000 | £50,000 | £20,000 | Maritim Hotel, Düsseldorf
row 5 : 2012 | Simon Whitlock (94.91) | 11 – 5 | Wes Newton (89.47) | PartyPoker.net | £200,000 | £50,000 | £20,000 | RWE-Sporthalle, Mülheim
row 6 : 2013 | Adrian Lewis (103.34) | 11 – 6 | Simon Whitlock (99.59) | PartyPoker.net | £200,000 | £50,000 | £20,000 | RWE-Sporthalle, Mülheim [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: what is the legs when the year is earlier than 2009?

Answer: 11 – 5
[Table] header: Year | Champion (average in final) | Legs | Runner-up (average in final) | Sponsor | Prize Fund | Champion | Runner-up | Venue row 1 : 2008 | Phil Taylor (104.35) | 11 – 5 | Adrian Lewis (96.56) | PartyPoker.net | £200,000 | £50,000 | £25,000 | Südbahnhof, Frankfurt
row 2 : 2009 | Phil Taylor (109.35) | 11 – 3 | Steve Beaton (97.16) | PartyPoker.net | £200,000 | £50,000 | £20,000 | Claus Event Center, Hoofddorp
row 3 : 2010 | Phil Taylor (105.74) | 11 – 1 | Wayne Jones (94.64) | PartyPoker.net | £200,000 | £50,000 | £20,000 | Stadthalle Dinslaken, Dinslake
row 4 : 2011 | Phil Taylor (109.29) | 11 – 8 | Adrian Lewis (98.72) | PartyPoker.net | £200,000 | £50,000 | £20,000 | Maritim Hotel, Düsseldorf
row 5 : 2012 | Simon Whitlock (94.91) | 11 – 5 | Wes Newton (89.47) | PartyPoker.net | £200,000 | £50,000 | £20,000 | RWE-Sporthalle, Mülheim
row 6 : 2013 | Adrian Lewis (103.34) | 11 – 6 | Simon Whitlock (99.59) | PartyPoker.net | £200,000 | £50,000 | £20,000 | RWE-Sporthalle, Mülheim [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: what is the venue when the runner-up (average in final) is wayne jones (94.64)?

Answer: Stadthalle Dinslaken, Dinslake
[Table] header: Year | Champion (average in final) | Legs | Runner-up (average in final) | Sponsor | Prize Fund | Champion | Runner-up | Venue row 1 : 2008 | Phil Taylor (104.35) | 11 – 5 | Adrian Lewis (96.56) | PartyPoker.net | £200,000 | £50,000 | £25,000 | Südbahnhof, Frankfurt
row 2 : 2009 | Phil Taylor (109.35) | 11 – 3 | Steve Beaton (97.16) | PartyPoker.net | £200,000 | £50,000 | £20,000 | Claus Event Center, Hoofddorp
row 3 : 2010 | Phil Taylor (105.74) | 11 – 1 | Wayne Jones (94.64) | PartyPoker.net | £200,000 | £50,000 | £20,000 | Stadthalle Dinslaken, Dinslake
row 4 : 2011 | Phil Taylor (109.29) | 11 – 8 | Adrian Lewis (98.72) | PartyPoker.net | £200,000 | £50,000 | £20,000 | Maritim Hotel, Düsseldorf
row 5 : 2012 | Simon Whitlock (94.91) | 11 – 5 | Wes Newton (89.47) | PartyPoker.net | £200,000 | £50,000 | £20,000 | RWE-Sporthalle, Mülheim
row 6 : 2013 | Adrian Lewis (103.34) | 11 – 6 | Simon Whitlock (99.59) | PartyPoker.net | £200,000 | £50,000 | £20,000 | RWE-Sporthalle, Mülheim [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What is the legs when the venue is rwe-sporthalle, mülheim and the runner-up (average in final) is simon whitlock (99.59)?

Answer: 11 – 6
[Table] header: Overall points | 100 m | 400 m | 110 m H | 1500 m row 1 : 8791 | 989 10.44 s | 865 48.92 s | 984 13.93 s | 522 5:06.59 min
row 2 : 8551 | 870 10.96 s | 943 47.30 s | 948 14.21 s | 761 4:27.47 min
row 3 : 8527 ( NR ) | 883 10.90 s | 913 47.91 s | 955 14.15 s | 750 4:29.17 min
row 4 : 8328 | 845 11.07 s | 773 50.91 s | 915 14.47 s | 551 5:01.56 min
row 5 : 8253 (SB) | 804 11.26 s | 837 49.51 s | 948 14.21 s | 749 4:29.29 min
row 6 : 8241 (SB) | 814 11.21 s | 836 49.54 s | 885 14.71 s | 621 4:49.63 min
row 7 : 8238 (SB) | 968 10.53 s | 924 47.70 s | 927 14.37 s | 752 4:28.94 min
row 8 : 8220 | 834 11.12 s | 831 49.65 s | 927 14.37 s | 726 4:32.90 min
row 9 : 8205 | 894 10.85 s | 911 47.96 s | 964 14.08 s | 734 4:31.62 min
row 10 : 8194 | 906 10.80 s | 886 48.47 s | 885 14.71 s | 766 4:26.77 min
row 11 : 8178 (PB) | 827 11.15 s | 774 50.90 s | 910 14.51 s | 637 4:47.03 min
row 12 : 8154 | 856 11.02 s | 744 51.56 s | 789 15.51 s | 672 4:41.34 min
row 13 : 8118 (PB) | 885 10.89 s | 862 48.98 s | 967 14.06 s | 621 4:49.60 min
row 14 : 8055 | 819 11.19 s | 815 49.99 s | 882 14.73 s | 693 4:37.96 min
row 15 : 7992 | 942 10.64 s | 830 49.66 s | 987 13.90 s | 557 5:00.49 min
row 16 : 7906 (SB) | 793 11.31 s | 814 50.02 s | 908 14.52 s | 692 4:38.14 min
row 17 : 7838 | 797 11.29 s | 782 50.71 s | 842 15.06 s | 648 4:45.17 min
row 18 : 7835 (SB) | 827 11.15 s | 843 49.39 s | 899 14.60 s | 685 4:39.32 min
row 19 : 7714 | 861 11.00 s | 875 48.72 s | 934 14.32 s | 666 4:42.26 min
row 20 : 7665 ( NR ) | 915 10.76 s | 885 48.51 s | 935 14.31 s | 491 5:12.22 min
row 21 : 7516 | 847 11.06 s | 950 47.16 s | 887 14.69 s | 491 5:12.22 min
row 22 : 7483 | 878 10.92 s | 780 50.75 s | 894 14.64 s | 522 5:06.67 min
row 23 : 7336 | 814 11.21 s | 810 50.10 s | 846 15.03 s | 697 4:37.37 min
row 24 : 7021 | 825 11.16 s | 724 52.02 s | 777 15.61 s | 610 4:51.42 min
row 25 : 6876 | 834 11.12 s | 849 49.27 s | 897 14.61 s | 740 4:30.74 min
row 26 : 6486 | 821 11.18 s | 787 50.60 s | 705 16.25 s | 449 5:20.26 min
row 27 : DNF | 789 11.33 s | 729 51.91 s | 941 14.26 s | DNS
row 28 : DNF | 970 10.52 s | 921 47.75 s | 949 14.20 s | DNS
row 29 : DNF | 782 11.36 s | 742 51.61 s | 816 15.28 s | DNS
row 30 : DNF | 854 11.03 s | 782 50.71 s | 0 DNF | DNS
row 31 : DNF | 863 10.99 s | 851 49.21 s | DNS | DNS
row 32 : DNF | 759 11.47 s | 0 DNF | DNS | DNS
row 33 : DNF | 771 11.41 s | 0 DNF | DNS | DNS
row 34 : DNF | 677 11.87 s | 0 DNF | DNS | DNS
row 35 : DNF | 883 10.90 s | DNS | DNS | DNS
row 36 : DNF | 799 11.28 s | DNS | DNS | DNS
row 37 : DNF | 740 11.56 s | DNS | DNS | DNS
row 38 : DNF | 834 11.12 s | DNS | DNS | DNS
row 39 : DNF | 679 11.86 s | DNS | DNS | DNS
row 40 : DNF | 685 11.83 s | DNS | DNS | DNS [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What is the 110m H number when the overall points are 7835 (sb)?

Answer: 899 14.60 s
[Table] header: Overall points | 100 m | 400 m | 110 m H | 1500 m row 1 : 8791 | 989 10.44 s | 865 48.92 s | 984 13.93 s | 522 5:06.59 min
row 2 : 8551 | 870 10.96 s | 943 47.30 s | 948 14.21 s | 761 4:27.47 min
row 3 : 8527 ( NR ) | 883 10.90 s | 913 47.91 s | 955 14.15 s | 750 4:29.17 min
row 4 : 8328 | 845 11.07 s | 773 50.91 s | 915 14.47 s | 551 5:01.56 min
row 5 : 8253 (SB) | 804 11.26 s | 837 49.51 s | 948 14.21 s | 749 4:29.29 min
row 6 : 8241 (SB) | 814 11.21 s | 836 49.54 s | 885 14.71 s | 621 4:49.63 min
row 7 : 8238 (SB) | 968 10.53 s | 924 47.70 s | 927 14.37 s | 752 4:28.94 min
row 8 : 8220 | 834 11.12 s | 831 49.65 s | 927 14.37 s | 726 4:32.90 min
row 9 : 8205 | 894 10.85 s | 911 47.96 s | 964 14.08 s | 734 4:31.62 min
row 10 : 8194 | 906 10.80 s | 886 48.47 s | 885 14.71 s | 766 4:26.77 min
row 11 : 8178 (PB) | 827 11.15 s | 774 50.90 s | 910 14.51 s | 637 4:47.03 min
row 12 : 8154 | 856 11.02 s | 744 51.56 s | 789 15.51 s | 672 4:41.34 min
row 13 : 8118 (PB) | 885 10.89 s | 862 48.98 s | 967 14.06 s | 621 4:49.60 min
row 14 : 8055 | 819 11.19 s | 815 49.99 s | 882 14.73 s | 693 4:37.96 min
row 15 : 7992 | 942 10.64 s | 830 49.66 s | 987 13.90 s | 557 5:00.49 min
row 16 : 7906 (SB) | 793 11.31 s | 814 50.02 s | 908 14.52 s | 692 4:38.14 min
row 17 : 7838 | 797 11.29 s | 782 50.71 s | 842 15.06 s | 648 4:45.17 min
row 18 : 7835 (SB) | 827 11.15 s | 843 49.39 s | 899 14.60 s | 685 4:39.32 min
row 19 : 7714 | 861 11.00 s | 875 48.72 s | 934 14.32 s | 666 4:42.26 min
row 20 : 7665 ( NR ) | 915 10.76 s | 885 48.51 s | 935 14.31 s | 491 5:12.22 min
row 21 : 7516 | 847 11.06 s | 950 47.16 s | 887 14.69 s | 491 5:12.22 min
row 22 : 7483 | 878 10.92 s | 780 50.75 s | 894 14.64 s | 522 5:06.67 min
row 23 : 7336 | 814 11.21 s | 810 50.10 s | 846 15.03 s | 697 4:37.37 min
row 24 : 7021 | 825 11.16 s | 724 52.02 s | 777 15.61 s | 610 4:51.42 min
row 25 : 6876 | 834 11.12 s | 849 49.27 s | 897 14.61 s | 740 4:30.74 min
row 26 : 6486 | 821 11.18 s | 787 50.60 s | 705 16.25 s | 449 5:20.26 min
row 27 : DNF | 789 11.33 s | 729 51.91 s | 941 14.26 s | DNS
row 28 : DNF | 970 10.52 s | 921 47.75 s | 949 14.20 s | DNS
row 29 : DNF | 782 11.36 s | 742 51.61 s | 816 15.28 s | DNS
row 30 : DNF | 854 11.03 s | 782 50.71 s | 0 DNF | DNS
row 31 : DNF | 863 10.99 s | 851 49.21 s | DNS | DNS
row 32 : DNF | 759 11.47 s | 0 DNF | DNS | DNS
row 33 : DNF | 771 11.41 s | 0 DNF | DNS | DNS
row 34 : DNF | 677 11.87 s | 0 DNF | DNS | DNS
row 35 : DNF | 883 10.90 s | DNS | DNS | DNS
row 36 : DNF | 799 11.28 s | DNS | DNS | DNS
row 37 : DNF | 740 11.56 s | DNS | DNS | DNS
row 38 : DNF | 834 11.12 s | DNS | DNS | DNS
row 39 : DNF | 679 11.86 s | DNS | DNS | DNS
row 40 : DNF | 685 11.83 s | DNS | DNS | DNS [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What is the 100 m time when the 110 m H number is 0 dnf?

Answer: 854 11.03 s
[Table] header: Overall points | 100 m | 400 m | 110 m H | 1500 m row 1 : 8791 | 989 10.44 s | 865 48.92 s | 984 13.93 s | 522 5:06.59 min
row 2 : 8551 | 870 10.96 s | 943 47.30 s | 948 14.21 s | 761 4:27.47 min
row 3 : 8527 ( NR ) | 883 10.90 s | 913 47.91 s | 955 14.15 s | 750 4:29.17 min
row 4 : 8328 | 845 11.07 s | 773 50.91 s | 915 14.47 s | 551 5:01.56 min
row 5 : 8253 (SB) | 804 11.26 s | 837 49.51 s | 948 14.21 s | 749 4:29.29 min
row 6 : 8241 (SB) | 814 11.21 s | 836 49.54 s | 885 14.71 s | 621 4:49.63 min
row 7 : 8238 (SB) | 968 10.53 s | 924 47.70 s | 927 14.37 s | 752 4:28.94 min
row 8 : 8220 | 834 11.12 s | 831 49.65 s | 927 14.37 s | 726 4:32.90 min
row 9 : 8205 | 894 10.85 s | 911 47.96 s | 964 14.08 s | 734 4:31.62 min
row 10 : 8194 | 906 10.80 s | 886 48.47 s | 885 14.71 s | 766 4:26.77 min
row 11 : 8178 (PB) | 827 11.15 s | 774 50.90 s | 910 14.51 s | 637 4:47.03 min
row 12 : 8154 | 856 11.02 s | 744 51.56 s | 789 15.51 s | 672 4:41.34 min
row 13 : 8118 (PB) | 885 10.89 s | 862 48.98 s | 967 14.06 s | 621 4:49.60 min
row 14 : 8055 | 819 11.19 s | 815 49.99 s | 882 14.73 s | 693 4:37.96 min
row 15 : 7992 | 942 10.64 s | 830 49.66 s | 987 13.90 s | 557 5:00.49 min
row 16 : 7906 (SB) | 793 11.31 s | 814 50.02 s | 908 14.52 s | 692 4:38.14 min
row 17 : 7838 | 797 11.29 s | 782 50.71 s | 842 15.06 s | 648 4:45.17 min
row 18 : 7835 (SB) | 827 11.15 s | 843 49.39 s | 899 14.60 s | 685 4:39.32 min
row 19 : 7714 | 861 11.00 s | 875 48.72 s | 934 14.32 s | 666 4:42.26 min
row 20 : 7665 ( NR ) | 915 10.76 s | 885 48.51 s | 935 14.31 s | 491 5:12.22 min
row 21 : 7516 | 847 11.06 s | 950 47.16 s | 887 14.69 s | 491 5:12.22 min
row 22 : 7483 | 878 10.92 s | 780 50.75 s | 894 14.64 s | 522 5:06.67 min
row 23 : 7336 | 814 11.21 s | 810 50.10 s | 846 15.03 s | 697 4:37.37 min
row 24 : 7021 | 825 11.16 s | 724 52.02 s | 777 15.61 s | 610 4:51.42 min
row 25 : 6876 | 834 11.12 s | 849 49.27 s | 897 14.61 s | 740 4:30.74 min
row 26 : 6486 | 821 11.18 s | 787 50.60 s | 705 16.25 s | 449 5:20.26 min
row 27 : DNF | 789 11.33 s | 729 51.91 s | 941 14.26 s | DNS
row 28 : DNF | 970 10.52 s | 921 47.75 s | 949 14.20 s | DNS
row 29 : DNF | 782 11.36 s | 742 51.61 s | 816 15.28 s | DNS
row 30 : DNF | 854 11.03 s | 782 50.71 s | 0 DNF | DNS
row 31 : DNF | 863 10.99 s | 851 49.21 s | DNS | DNS
row 32 : DNF | 759 11.47 s | 0 DNF | DNS | DNS
row 33 : DNF | 771 11.41 s | 0 DNF | DNS | DNS
row 34 : DNF | 677 11.87 s | 0 DNF | DNS | DNS
row 35 : DNF | 883 10.90 s | DNS | DNS | DNS
row 36 : DNF | 799 11.28 s | DNS | DNS | DNS
row 37 : DNF | 740 11.56 s | DNS | DNS | DNS
row 38 : DNF | 834 11.12 s | DNS | DNS | DNS
row 39 : DNF | 679 11.86 s | DNS | DNS | DNS
row 40 : DNF | 685 11.83 s | DNS | DNS | DNS [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What is the 110 m H when the 1500 m time is 693 4:37.96 min?

Answer: 882 14.73 s
[Table] header: Overall points | 100 m | 400 m | 110 m H | 1500 m row 1 : 8791 | 989 10.44 s | 865 48.92 s | 984 13.93 s | 522 5:06.59 min
row 2 : 8551 | 870 10.96 s | 943 47.30 s | 948 14.21 s | 761 4:27.47 min
row 3 : 8527 ( NR ) | 883 10.90 s | 913 47.91 s | 955 14.15 s | 750 4:29.17 min
row 4 : 8328 | 845 11.07 s | 773 50.91 s | 915 14.47 s | 551 5:01.56 min
row 5 : 8253 (SB) | 804 11.26 s | 837 49.51 s | 948 14.21 s | 749 4:29.29 min
row 6 : 8241 (SB) | 814 11.21 s | 836 49.54 s | 885 14.71 s | 621 4:49.63 min
row 7 : 8238 (SB) | 968 10.53 s | 924 47.70 s | 927 14.37 s | 752 4:28.94 min
row 8 : 8220 | 834 11.12 s | 831 49.65 s | 927 14.37 s | 726 4:32.90 min
row 9 : 8205 | 894 10.85 s | 911 47.96 s | 964 14.08 s | 734 4:31.62 min
row 10 : 8194 | 906 10.80 s | 886 48.47 s | 885 14.71 s | 766 4:26.77 min
row 11 : 8178 (PB) | 827 11.15 s | 774 50.90 s | 910 14.51 s | 637 4:47.03 min
row 12 : 8154 | 856 11.02 s | 744 51.56 s | 789 15.51 s | 672 4:41.34 min
row 13 : 8118 (PB) | 885 10.89 s | 862 48.98 s | 967 14.06 s | 621 4:49.60 min
row 14 : 8055 | 819 11.19 s | 815 49.99 s | 882 14.73 s | 693 4:37.96 min
row 15 : 7992 | 942 10.64 s | 830 49.66 s | 987 13.90 s | 557 5:00.49 min
row 16 : 7906 (SB) | 793 11.31 s | 814 50.02 s | 908 14.52 s | 692 4:38.14 min
row 17 : 7838 | 797 11.29 s | 782 50.71 s | 842 15.06 s | 648 4:45.17 min
row 18 : 7835 (SB) | 827 11.15 s | 843 49.39 s | 899 14.60 s | 685 4:39.32 min
row 19 : 7714 | 861 11.00 s | 875 48.72 s | 934 14.32 s | 666 4:42.26 min
row 20 : 7665 ( NR ) | 915 10.76 s | 885 48.51 s | 935 14.31 s | 491 5:12.22 min
row 21 : 7516 | 847 11.06 s | 950 47.16 s | 887 14.69 s | 491 5:12.22 min
row 22 : 7483 | 878 10.92 s | 780 50.75 s | 894 14.64 s | 522 5:06.67 min
row 23 : 7336 | 814 11.21 s | 810 50.10 s | 846 15.03 s | 697 4:37.37 min
row 24 : 7021 | 825 11.16 s | 724 52.02 s | 777 15.61 s | 610 4:51.42 min
row 25 : 6876 | 834 11.12 s | 849 49.27 s | 897 14.61 s | 740 4:30.74 min
row 26 : 6486 | 821 11.18 s | 787 50.60 s | 705 16.25 s | 449 5:20.26 min
row 27 : DNF | 789 11.33 s | 729 51.91 s | 941 14.26 s | DNS
row 28 : DNF | 970 10.52 s | 921 47.75 s | 949 14.20 s | DNS
row 29 : DNF | 782 11.36 s | 742 51.61 s | 816 15.28 s | DNS
row 30 : DNF | 854 11.03 s | 782 50.71 s | 0 DNF | DNS
row 31 : DNF | 863 10.99 s | 851 49.21 s | DNS | DNS
row 32 : DNF | 759 11.47 s | 0 DNF | DNS | DNS
row 33 : DNF | 771 11.41 s | 0 DNF | DNS | DNS
row 34 : DNF | 677 11.87 s | 0 DNF | DNS | DNS
row 35 : DNF | 883 10.90 s | DNS | DNS | DNS
row 36 : DNF | 799 11.28 s | DNS | DNS | DNS
row 37 : DNF | 740 11.56 s | DNS | DNS | DNS
row 38 : DNF | 834 11.12 s | DNS | DNS | DNS
row 39 : DNF | 679 11.86 s | DNS | DNS | DNS
row 40 : DNF | 685 11.83 s | DNS | DNS | DNS [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What is the 400 m time when the 100 m time is 814 11.21 s, and the 110 m H is 846 15.03 s?

Answer: 810 50.10 s
[Table] header: Overall points | 100 m | 400 m | 110 m H | 1500 m row 1 : 8791 | 989 10.44 s | 865 48.92 s | 984 13.93 s | 522 5:06.59 min
row 2 : 8551 | 870 10.96 s | 943 47.30 s | 948 14.21 s | 761 4:27.47 min
row 3 : 8527 ( NR ) | 883 10.90 s | 913 47.91 s | 955 14.15 s | 750 4:29.17 min
row 4 : 8328 | 845 11.07 s | 773 50.91 s | 915 14.47 s | 551 5:01.56 min
row 5 : 8253 (SB) | 804 11.26 s | 837 49.51 s | 948 14.21 s | 749 4:29.29 min
row 6 : 8241 (SB) | 814 11.21 s | 836 49.54 s | 885 14.71 s | 621 4:49.63 min
row 7 : 8238 (SB) | 968 10.53 s | 924 47.70 s | 927 14.37 s | 752 4:28.94 min
row 8 : 8220 | 834 11.12 s | 831 49.65 s | 927 14.37 s | 726 4:32.90 min
row 9 : 8205 | 894 10.85 s | 911 47.96 s | 964 14.08 s | 734 4:31.62 min
row 10 : 8194 | 906 10.80 s | 886 48.47 s | 885 14.71 s | 766 4:26.77 min
row 11 : 8178 (PB) | 827 11.15 s | 774 50.90 s | 910 14.51 s | 637 4:47.03 min
row 12 : 8154 | 856 11.02 s | 744 51.56 s | 789 15.51 s | 672 4:41.34 min
row 13 : 8118 (PB) | 885 10.89 s | 862 48.98 s | 967 14.06 s | 621 4:49.60 min
row 14 : 8055 | 819 11.19 s | 815 49.99 s | 882 14.73 s | 693 4:37.96 min
row 15 : 7992 | 942 10.64 s | 830 49.66 s | 987 13.90 s | 557 5:00.49 min
row 16 : 7906 (SB) | 793 11.31 s | 814 50.02 s | 908 14.52 s | 692 4:38.14 min
row 17 : 7838 | 797 11.29 s | 782 50.71 s | 842 15.06 s | 648 4:45.17 min
row 18 : 7835 (SB) | 827 11.15 s | 843 49.39 s | 899 14.60 s | 685 4:39.32 min
row 19 : 7714 | 861 11.00 s | 875 48.72 s | 934 14.32 s | 666 4:42.26 min
row 20 : 7665 ( NR ) | 915 10.76 s | 885 48.51 s | 935 14.31 s | 491 5:12.22 min
row 21 : 7516 | 847 11.06 s | 950 47.16 s | 887 14.69 s | 491 5:12.22 min
row 22 : 7483 | 878 10.92 s | 780 50.75 s | 894 14.64 s | 522 5:06.67 min
row 23 : 7336 | 814 11.21 s | 810 50.10 s | 846 15.03 s | 697 4:37.37 min
row 24 : 7021 | 825 11.16 s | 724 52.02 s | 777 15.61 s | 610 4:51.42 min
row 25 : 6876 | 834 11.12 s | 849 49.27 s | 897 14.61 s | 740 4:30.74 min
row 26 : 6486 | 821 11.18 s | 787 50.60 s | 705 16.25 s | 449 5:20.26 min
row 27 : DNF | 789 11.33 s | 729 51.91 s | 941 14.26 s | DNS
row 28 : DNF | 970 10.52 s | 921 47.75 s | 949 14.20 s | DNS
row 29 : DNF | 782 11.36 s | 742 51.61 s | 816 15.28 s | DNS
row 30 : DNF | 854 11.03 s | 782 50.71 s | 0 DNF | DNS
row 31 : DNF | 863 10.99 s | 851 49.21 s | DNS | DNS
row 32 : DNF | 759 11.47 s | 0 DNF | DNS | DNS
row 33 : DNF | 771 11.41 s | 0 DNF | DNS | DNS
row 34 : DNF | 677 11.87 s | 0 DNF | DNS | DNS
row 35 : DNF | 883 10.90 s | DNS | DNS | DNS
row 36 : DNF | 799 11.28 s | DNS | DNS | DNS
row 37 : DNF | 740 11.56 s | DNS | DNS | DNS
row 38 : DNF | 834 11.12 s | DNS | DNS | DNS
row 39 : DNF | 679 11.86 s | DNS | DNS | DNS
row 40 : DNF | 685 11.83 s | DNS | DNS | DNS [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What is the 100 m time when the overall points are dnf, and the 400 m is dns?

Answer: 883 10.90 s, 799 11.28 s, 740 11.56 s, 834 11.12 s, 679 11.86 s, 685 11.83 s
[Table] header: Week | Date | Opponent | Result | Record | Attendance row 1 : 1 | September 11, 2005 | Indianapolis Colts | L 24–7 | 0–1–0 | 70,501
row 2 : 2 | September 18, 2005 | at Tennessee Titans | L 25–10 | 0–2–0 | 69,149
row 3 : 3 | Bye | Bye | Bye | Bye | Bye
row 4 : 4 | October 2, 2005 | New York Jets | W 13–3 | 1–2–0 | 70,479
row 5 : 5 | October 9, 2005 | at Detroit Lions | L 35–17 | 1–3–0 | 61,201
row 6 : 6 | October 16, 2005 | Cleveland Browns | W 16–3 | 2–3–0 | 70,196
row 7 : 7 | October 23, 2005 | at Chicago Bears | L 10–6 | 2–4–0 | 62,102
row 8 : 8 | October 31, 2005 | at Pittsburgh Steelers | L 20–19 | 2–5–0 | 64,178
row 9 : 9 | November 6, 2005 | Cincinnati Bengals | L 21–9 | 2–6–0 | 70,540
row 10 : 10 | November 13, 2005 | at Jacksonville Jaguars | L 30–3 | 2–7–0 | 66,107
row 11 : 11 | November 20, 2005 | Pittsburgh Steelers | W 16–13 OT | 3–7–0 | 70,601
row 12 : 12 | November 27, 2005 | at Cincinnati Bengals | L 42–29 | 3–8–0 | 65,680
row 13 : 13 | December 4, 2005 | Houston Texans | W 16–15 | 4–8–0 | 69,909
row 14 : 14 | December 11, 2005 | at Denver Broncos | L 12–10 | 4–9–0 | 75,651
row 15 : 15 | December 19, 2005 | Green Bay Packers | W 48–3 [a ] | 5–9–0 | 70,604
row 16 : 16 | December 25, 2005 | Minnesota Vikings | W 30–23 | 6–9–0 | 70,246
row 17 : 17 | January 1, 2006 | at Cleveland Browns | L 20–16 | 6–10–0 | 69,871 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What is the Record of the game with an Attendance of 70,604?

Answer: 5–9–0
[Table] header: Week | Date | Opponent | Result | Record | Attendance row 1 : 1 | September 11, 2005 | Indianapolis Colts | L 24–7 | 0–1–0 | 70,501
row 2 : 2 | September 18, 2005 | at Tennessee Titans | L 25–10 | 0–2–0 | 69,149
row 3 : 3 | Bye | Bye | Bye | Bye | Bye
row 4 : 4 | October 2, 2005 | New York Jets | W 13–3 | 1–2–0 | 70,479
row 5 : 5 | October 9, 2005 | at Detroit Lions | L 35–17 | 1–3–0 | 61,201
row 6 : 6 | October 16, 2005 | Cleveland Browns | W 16–3 | 2–3–0 | 70,196
row 7 : 7 | October 23, 2005 | at Chicago Bears | L 10–6 | 2–4–0 | 62,102
row 8 : 8 | October 31, 2005 | at Pittsburgh Steelers | L 20–19 | 2–5–0 | 64,178
row 9 : 9 | November 6, 2005 | Cincinnati Bengals | L 21–9 | 2–6–0 | 70,540
row 10 : 10 | November 13, 2005 | at Jacksonville Jaguars | L 30–3 | 2–7–0 | 66,107
row 11 : 11 | November 20, 2005 | Pittsburgh Steelers | W 16–13 OT | 3–7–0 | 70,601
row 12 : 12 | November 27, 2005 | at Cincinnati Bengals | L 42–29 | 3–8–0 | 65,680
row 13 : 13 | December 4, 2005 | Houston Texans | W 16–15 | 4–8–0 | 69,909
row 14 : 14 | December 11, 2005 | at Denver Broncos | L 12–10 | 4–9–0 | 75,651
row 15 : 15 | December 19, 2005 | Green Bay Packers | W 48–3 [a ] | 5–9–0 | 70,604
row 16 : 16 | December 25, 2005 | Minnesota Vikings | W 30–23 | 6–9–0 | 70,246
row 17 : 17 | January 1, 2006 | at Cleveland Browns | L 20–16 | 6–10–0 | 69,871 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: Who is the Opponent in the game with a Record of 1–3–0?

Answer: at Detroit Lions
[Table] header: Week | Date | Opponent | Result | Record | Attendance row 1 : 1 | September 11, 2005 | Indianapolis Colts | L 24–7 | 0–1–0 | 70,501
row 2 : 2 | September 18, 2005 | at Tennessee Titans | L 25–10 | 0–2–0 | 69,149
row 3 : 3 | Bye | Bye | Bye | Bye | Bye
row 4 : 4 | October 2, 2005 | New York Jets | W 13–3 | 1–2–0 | 70,479
row 5 : 5 | October 9, 2005 | at Detroit Lions | L 35–17 | 1–3–0 | 61,201
row 6 : 6 | October 16, 2005 | Cleveland Browns | W 16–3 | 2–3–0 | 70,196
row 7 : 7 | October 23, 2005 | at Chicago Bears | L 10–6 | 2–4–0 | 62,102
row 8 : 8 | October 31, 2005 | at Pittsburgh Steelers | L 20–19 | 2–5–0 | 64,178
row 9 : 9 | November 6, 2005 | Cincinnati Bengals | L 21–9 | 2–6–0 | 70,540
row 10 : 10 | November 13, 2005 | at Jacksonville Jaguars | L 30–3 | 2–7–0 | 66,107
row 11 : 11 | November 20, 2005 | Pittsburgh Steelers | W 16–13 OT | 3–7–0 | 70,601
row 12 : 12 | November 27, 2005 | at Cincinnati Bengals | L 42–29 | 3–8–0 | 65,680
row 13 : 13 | December 4, 2005 | Houston Texans | W 16–15 | 4–8–0 | 69,909
row 14 : 14 | December 11, 2005 | at Denver Broncos | L 12–10 | 4–9–0 | 75,651
row 15 : 15 | December 19, 2005 | Green Bay Packers | W 48–3 [a ] | 5–9–0 | 70,604
row 16 : 16 | December 25, 2005 | Minnesota Vikings | W 30–23 | 6–9–0 | 70,246
row 17 : 17 | January 1, 2006 | at Cleveland Browns | L 20–16 | 6–10–0 | 69,871 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What is the Record of the game with an Attendance of 70,479?

Answer: 1–2–0
[Table] header: Date | Tournament | Winning Score | Margin of Victory | Runner(s)-up row 1 : May 1, 1977 | Birmingham Classic | -9 (68-69-70=207 | 1 stroke | Debbie Massey
row 2 : Jun 26, 1977 | Hoosier Classic | -9 (70-70-67=207 | 2 strokes | Judy Rankin , Jan Stephenson
row 3 : Jul 31, 1977 | Pocono Northeast Classic | -6 (71-73-69=21 | 1 stroke | Sandra Post
row 4 : Aug 14, 1977 | Long Island Charity Classic | -9 (73-69-66-71 | 2 stroke | Nancy Lopez , Kathy Whitworth
row 5 : Aug 21, 1977 | Wheeling Classic | -7 (67-72-70=20 | 1 stroke | Hollis Stacy
row 6 : Feb 12, 1978 | American Cancer Society Classic | -4 (68-72-72=212 | 1 stroke | Beth Solomon , Nayoko Yoshik
row 7 : Jul 12, 1981 | Mayflower Classic | -9 (68-69-68-74 | 4 strokes | Myra Blackwelder , Holl [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What was the winning score on Aug 21, 1977?

Answer: -7 (67-72-70=20
[Table] header: Date | Tournament | Winning Score | Margin of Victory | Runner(s)-up row 1 : May 1, 1977 | Birmingham Classic | -9 (68-69-70=207 | 1 stroke | Debbie Massey
row 2 : Jun 26, 1977 | Hoosier Classic | -9 (70-70-67=207 | 2 strokes | Judy Rankin , Jan Stephenson
row 3 : Jul 31, 1977 | Pocono Northeast Classic | -6 (71-73-69=21 | 1 stroke | Sandra Post
row 4 : Aug 14, 1977 | Long Island Charity Classic | -9 (73-69-66-71 | 2 stroke | Nancy Lopez , Kathy Whitworth
row 5 : Aug 21, 1977 | Wheeling Classic | -7 (67-72-70=20 | 1 stroke | Hollis Stacy
row 6 : Feb 12, 1978 | American Cancer Society Classic | -4 (68-72-72=212 | 1 stroke | Beth Solomon , Nayoko Yoshik
row 7 : Jul 12, 1981 | Mayflower Classic | -9 (68-69-68-74 | 4 strokes | Myra Blackwelder , Holl [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What's the margin of victory during the Pocono Northeast Classic?

Answer: 1 stroke
[Table] header: Date | Tournament | Winning Score | Margin of Victory | Runner(s)-up row 1 : May 1, 1977 | Birmingham Classic | -9 (68-69-70=207 | 1 stroke | Debbie Massey
row 2 : Jun 26, 1977 | Hoosier Classic | -9 (70-70-67=207 | 2 strokes | Judy Rankin , Jan Stephenson
row 3 : Jul 31, 1977 | Pocono Northeast Classic | -6 (71-73-69=21 | 1 stroke | Sandra Post
row 4 : Aug 14, 1977 | Long Island Charity Classic | -9 (73-69-66-71 | 2 stroke | Nancy Lopez , Kathy Whitworth
row 5 : Aug 21, 1977 | Wheeling Classic | -7 (67-72-70=20 | 1 stroke | Hollis Stacy
row 6 : Feb 12, 1978 | American Cancer Society Classic | -4 (68-72-72=212 | 1 stroke | Beth Solomon , Nayoko Yoshik
row 7 : Jul 12, 1981 | Mayflower Classic | -9 (68-69-68-74 | 4 strokes | Myra Blackwelder , Holl [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What's the winning score on Feb 12, 1978?

Answer: -4 (68-72-72=212
[Table] header: Date | Tournament | Winning Score | Margin of Victory | Runner(s)-up row 1 : May 1, 1977 | Birmingham Classic | -9 (68-69-70=207 | 1 stroke | Debbie Massey
row 2 : Jun 26, 1977 | Hoosier Classic | -9 (70-70-67=207 | 2 strokes | Judy Rankin , Jan Stephenson
row 3 : Jul 31, 1977 | Pocono Northeast Classic | -6 (71-73-69=21 | 1 stroke | Sandra Post
row 4 : Aug 14, 1977 | Long Island Charity Classic | -9 (73-69-66-71 | 2 stroke | Nancy Lopez , Kathy Whitworth
row 5 : Aug 21, 1977 | Wheeling Classic | -7 (67-72-70=20 | 1 stroke | Hollis Stacy
row 6 : Feb 12, 1978 | American Cancer Society Classic | -4 (68-72-72=212 | 1 stroke | Beth Solomon , Nayoko Yoshik
row 7 : Jul 12, 1981 | Mayflower Classic | -9 (68-69-68-74 | 4 strokes | Myra Blackwelder , Holl [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: Who were the runner(s)-up with a winning score of -7 (67-72-70=209)?

Answer: none
[Table] header: Name | Type | Relation | Length | Year row 1 : Panyo Panyo Di Gi Charat | TV | Prequel | 48 x 5 mins | 2002
row 2 : Di Gi Charat | TV | Original | 16 x 3 mins | 1999
row 3 : Di Gi Charat Nyo | TV | Alternate | 52 x 20 mins | 2004
row 4 : Summer/Xmas | TV | Sidestory | 8 x 20 mins | 2000
row 5 : Ohanami | TV | Sidestory | 4 x 20 mins | 2001
row 6 : Gekijouban Di Gi Charat | Movie | Sidestory | 20 mins | 2001
row 7 : Leave it to Piyoko | OVA | Sidestory | 8 x 20 mins | 2003
row 8 : Winter Garden | TV | Alternate | 2 x 20 mins | 2006 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: Which Name has a Year larger than 2001, and a Length of 52 x 20 mins?

Answer: Di Gi Charat Nyo
[Table] header: Name | Type | Relation | Length | Year row 1 : Panyo Panyo Di Gi Charat | TV | Prequel | 48 x 5 mins | 2002
row 2 : Di Gi Charat | TV | Original | 16 x 3 mins | 1999
row 3 : Di Gi Charat Nyo | TV | Alternate | 52 x 20 mins | 2004
row 4 : Summer/Xmas | TV | Sidestory | 8 x 20 mins | 2000
row 5 : Ohanami | TV | Sidestory | 4 x 20 mins | 2001
row 6 : Gekijouban Di Gi Charat | Movie | Sidestory | 20 mins | 2001
row 7 : Leave it to Piyoko | OVA | Sidestory | 8 x 20 mins | 2003
row 8 : Winter Garden | TV | Alternate | 2 x 20 mins | 2006 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What was the type after 2004?

Answer: TV
[Table] header: Name | Type | Relation | Length | Year row 1 : Panyo Panyo Di Gi Charat | TV | Prequel | 48 x 5 mins | 2002
row 2 : Di Gi Charat | TV | Original | 16 x 3 mins | 1999
row 3 : Di Gi Charat Nyo | TV | Alternate | 52 x 20 mins | 2004
row 4 : Summer/Xmas | TV | Sidestory | 8 x 20 mins | 2000
row 5 : Ohanami | TV | Sidestory | 4 x 20 mins | 2001
row 6 : Gekijouban Di Gi Charat | Movie | Sidestory | 20 mins | 2001
row 7 : Leave it to Piyoko | OVA | Sidestory | 8 x 20 mins | 2003
row 8 : Winter Garden | TV | Alternate | 2 x 20 mins | 2006 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: Which Relation has a Year larger than 2000, and a Length of 8 x 20 mins?

Answer: Sidestory
[Table] header: Name | Type | Relation | Length | Year row 1 : Panyo Panyo Di Gi Charat | TV | Prequel | 48 x 5 mins | 2002
row 2 : Di Gi Charat | TV | Original | 16 x 3 mins | 1999
row 3 : Di Gi Charat Nyo | TV | Alternate | 52 x 20 mins | 2004
row 4 : Summer/Xmas | TV | Sidestory | 8 x 20 mins | 2000
row 5 : Ohanami | TV | Sidestory | 4 x 20 mins | 2001
row 6 : Gekijouban Di Gi Charat | Movie | Sidestory | 20 mins | 2001
row 7 : Leave it to Piyoko | OVA | Sidestory | 8 x 20 mins | 2003
row 8 : Winter Garden | TV | Alternate | 2 x 20 mins | 2006 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: Which Relation has a Type of tv, and a Name of ohanami?

Answer: Sidestory
[Table] header: Non-dictatorship | Pareto efficiency | Majority | Monotone | Consistency & Participation | Condorcet | Condorcet loser | Clone independence | Reversal symmetry row 1 : No | No | No | Yes | Yes | No | No | Yes | Yes
row 2 : Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | No | No | No | Yes
row 3 : Yes | Yes | No | Yes | No | No | No | No | Yes
row 4 : Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | Yes
row 5 : No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What is the majority when the clone independence is no?

Answer: No, No
[Table] header: Non-dictatorship | Pareto efficiency | Majority | Monotone | Consistency & Participation | Condorcet | Condorcet loser | Clone independence | Reversal symmetry row 1 : No | No | No | Yes | Yes | No | No | Yes | Yes
row 2 : Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | No | No | No | Yes
row 3 : Yes | Yes | No | Yes | No | No | No | No | Yes
row 4 : Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | Yes
row 5 : No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: what is the consistency & participation when pareto efficiency is yes and condorcet is no?

Answer: Yes, No
[Table] header: Non-dictatorship | Pareto efficiency | Majority | Monotone | Consistency & Participation | Condorcet | Condorcet loser | Clone independence | Reversal symmetry row 1 : No | No | No | Yes | Yes | No | No | Yes | Yes
row 2 : Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | No | No | No | Yes
row 3 : Yes | Yes | No | Yes | No | No | No | No | Yes
row 4 : Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | Yes
row 5 : No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: what is the reversal symmetry when non-dictatorship is yes, consistency & participation is no, and clone independence is yes?

Answer: Yes
[Table] header: Non-dictatorship | Pareto efficiency | Majority | Monotone | Consistency & Participation | Condorcet | Condorcet loser | Clone independence | Reversal symmetry row 1 : No | No | No | Yes | Yes | No | No | Yes | Yes
row 2 : Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | No | No | No | Yes
row 3 : Yes | Yes | No | Yes | No | No | No | No | Yes
row 4 : Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | Yes
row 5 : No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: what is the reversal symmetry when non-dicatorship is no and pareto efficiency is no?

Answer: Yes
[Table] header: Non-dictatorship | Pareto efficiency | Majority | Monotone | Consistency & Participation | Condorcet | Condorcet loser | Clone independence | Reversal symmetry row 1 : No | No | No | Yes | Yes | No | No | Yes | Yes
row 2 : Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | No | No | No | Yes
row 3 : Yes | Yes | No | Yes | No | No | No | No | Yes
row 4 : Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | Yes
row 5 : No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: what is the monotone when pareto efficiency is yes, non-dictatorship is yes, and clone independence is yes?

Answer: Yes
[Table] header: Non-dictatorship | Pareto efficiency | Majority | Monotone | Consistency & Participation | Condorcet | Condorcet loser | Clone independence | Reversal symmetry row 1 : No | No | No | Yes | Yes | No | No | Yes | Yes
row 2 : Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | No | No | No | Yes
row 3 : Yes | Yes | No | Yes | No | No | No | No | Yes
row 4 : Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | Yes
row 5 : No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: what is the reversal symmetry when the non-dictatorship is no and condorcet loser is no?

Answer: Yes
[Table] header: Draw | Language | Artist | English translation | Place | Points row 1 : 01 | Italian | Enrico Ruggeri | Sun of Europe | 12 | 45
row 2 : 02 | Turkish | Burak Aydos | My darling brunette | 21 | 10
row 3 : 03 | German | Münchener Freiheit | Much too far | 18 | 18
row 4 : 04 | French | Annie Cotton | Quite simply myself | 3 | 148
row 5 : 05 | Danish | Tommy Seebach Band | Under the stars of the sky | 22 | 9
row 6 : 06 | Greek | Katerina Garbi | Greece, country of light | 9 | 64
row 7 : 07 | Dutch | Barbara Dex | Someone like you | 25 | 3
row 8 : 08 | English | William Mangion | — | 8 | 69
row 9 : 09 | Icelandic | Inga | Then you'll know the answer | 13 | 42
row 10 : 10 | German | Tony Wegas | Mary Magdalene | 14 | 32
row 11 : 11 | Portuguese | Anabela | The city (until dawn) | 10 | 60
row 12 : 12 | French, Corsican | Patrick Fiori | — | 4 | 121
row 13 : 13 | Swedish | Arvingarna | — | 7 | 89
row 14 : 14 | English | Niamh Kavanagh | — | 1 | 187
row 15 : 15 | French, Luxembourgish | Modern Times | Give me a chance | 20 | 11
row 16 : 16 | Slovene | 1X Band | A quiet rainy day | 22 | 9
row 17 : 17 | Finnish | Katri Helena | Come to me | 17 | 20
row 18 : 18 | Bosnian | Fazla | All the pain in the world | 16 | 27
row 19 : 19 | English | Sonia | — | 2 | 164
row 20 : 20 | Dutch | Ruth Jacott | Peace | 6 | 92
row 21 : 21 | Croatian , English | Put | — | 15 | 31
row 22 : 22 | Spanish | Eva Santamaría | Men | 11 | 58
row 23 : 23 | Greek | Zimboulakis & Van Beke | Don't stop | 19 | 17
row 24 : 24 | Hebrew , English | The Shiru Group | Sing | 24 | 4
row 25 : 25 | Norwegian | Silje Vige | All my thoughts | 5 | 120 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: For the English translation Someone Like You, what is the lowest draw?

Answer: 7.0