sail/symbolic-instruction-tuning huggingface dataset:
[Table] header: Home team | Home team score | Away team | Away team score | Venue | Crowd | Date row 1 : Footscray | 12.7 (79) | South Melbourne | 20.21 (141) | Western Oval | 11,115 | 14 July 1973
row 2 : Fitzroy | 16.12 (108) | North Melbourne | 13.18 (96) | Junction Oval | 9,886 | 14 July 1973
row 3 : Essendon | 23.13 (151) | Hawthorn | 18.8 (116) | Windy Hill | 22,437 | 14 July 1973
row 4 : Carlton | 18.14 (122) | Melbourne | 12.9 (81) | Princes Park | 22,283 | 14 July 1973
row 5 : Geelong | 13.10 (88) | Collingwood | 13.18 (96) | Kardinia Park | 15,892 | 14 July 1973
row 6 : Richmond | 13.12 (90) | St Kilda | 11.11 (77) | VFL Park | 31,502 | 14 July 1973 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: When the crowd was larger than 22,283 and the home team scored 23.13 (151), what did the away team score?

Answer: 18.8 (116)
[Table] header: Home team | Home team score | Away team | Away team score | Venue | Crowd | Date row 1 : Footscray | 12.7 (79) | South Melbourne | 20.21 (141) | Western Oval | 11,115 | 14 July 1973
row 2 : Fitzroy | 16.12 (108) | North Melbourne | 13.18 (96) | Junction Oval | 9,886 | 14 July 1973
row 3 : Essendon | 23.13 (151) | Hawthorn | 18.8 (116) | Windy Hill | 22,437 | 14 July 1973
row 4 : Carlton | 18.14 (122) | Melbourne | 12.9 (81) | Princes Park | 22,283 | 14 July 1973
row 5 : Geelong | 13.10 (88) | Collingwood | 13.18 (96) | Kardinia Park | 15,892 | 14 July 1973
row 6 : Richmond | 13.12 (90) | St Kilda | 11.11 (77) | VFL Park | 31,502 | 14 July 1973 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: When did the home team score 12.7 (79)?

Answer: 14 July 1973
[Table] header: Suburb | Population (in 2008) | Median age (in 2006) | Mean household size (in 2006) | Area (km²) | Density (/km²) | Date first settled as a suburb | Gazetted as a Division Name row 1 : Chifley | 2,325 | 36 years | 2.3 persons | 1.6 | 1,453 | 1966 | 12 May 1966
row 2 : Curtin | 5,133 | 41 years | 2.5 persons | 4.8 | 1,069 | 1962 | 20 September 1962
row 3 : Farrer | 3,360 | 41 years | 2.7 persons | 2.1 | 1,600 | 1967 | 12 May 1966
row 4 : Garran | 3,175 | 39 years | 2.5 persons | 2.7 | 1,175 | 1966 | 12 May 1966
row 5 : Hughes | 2,898 | 41 years | 2.5 persons | 1.8 | 1,610 | 1963 | 20 September 1962
row 6 : Isaacs | 2,424 | 45 years | 2.6 persons | 3.1 | 781 | 1986 | 12 May 1966
row 7 : Lyons | 2,444 | 38 years | 2.1 persons | 2.3 | 1,062 | 1965 | 20 September 1962
row 8 : Mawson | 2,861 | 40 years | 2.2 persons | 2.1 | 1,362 | 1967 | 12 May 1966
row 9 : O'Malley | 684 | 47 years | 3.1 persons | 2.6 | 263 | 1973 | 12 May 1966
row 10 : Pearce | 2,509 | 41 years | 2.3 persons | 1.7 | 1,475 | 1967 | 12 May 1966
row 11 : Phillip | 1,910 | 32 years | 1.7 persons | 2.6 | 734 | 1966 | 12 May 1966
row 12 : Torrens | 2,265 | 38 years | 2.6 persons | 1.3 | 1,742 | 1966 | 12 May 1966 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: Which Suburb was First Settled as a Suburb in 1962?

Answer: Curtin
[Table] header: Suburb | Population (in 2008) | Median age (in 2006) | Mean household size (in 2006) | Area (km²) | Density (/km²) | Date first settled as a suburb | Gazetted as a Division Name row 1 : Chifley | 2,325 | 36 years | 2.3 persons | 1.6 | 1,453 | 1966 | 12 May 1966
row 2 : Curtin | 5,133 | 41 years | 2.5 persons | 4.8 | 1,069 | 1962 | 20 September 1962
row 3 : Farrer | 3,360 | 41 years | 2.7 persons | 2.1 | 1,600 | 1967 | 12 May 1966
row 4 : Garran | 3,175 | 39 years | 2.5 persons | 2.7 | 1,175 | 1966 | 12 May 1966
row 5 : Hughes | 2,898 | 41 years | 2.5 persons | 1.8 | 1,610 | 1963 | 20 September 1962
row 6 : Isaacs | 2,424 | 45 years | 2.6 persons | 3.1 | 781 | 1986 | 12 May 1966
row 7 : Lyons | 2,444 | 38 years | 2.1 persons | 2.3 | 1,062 | 1965 | 20 September 1962
row 8 : Mawson | 2,861 | 40 years | 2.2 persons | 2.1 | 1,362 | 1967 | 12 May 1966
row 9 : O'Malley | 684 | 47 years | 3.1 persons | 2.6 | 263 | 1973 | 12 May 1966
row 10 : Pearce | 2,509 | 41 years | 2.3 persons | 1.7 | 1,475 | 1967 | 12 May 1966
row 11 : Phillip | 1,910 | 32 years | 1.7 persons | 2.6 | 734 | 1966 | 12 May 1966
row 12 : Torrens | 2,265 | 38 years | 2.6 persons | 1.3 | 1,742 | 1966 | 12 May 1966 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What's the Area with a Density of 263?

Answer: 2.6
[Table] header: Suburb | Population (in 2008) | Median age (in 2006) | Mean household size (in 2006) | Area (km²) | Density (/km²) | Date first settled as a suburb | Gazetted as a Division Name row 1 : Chifley | 2,325 | 36 years | 2.3 persons | 1.6 | 1,453 | 1966 | 12 May 1966
row 2 : Curtin | 5,133 | 41 years | 2.5 persons | 4.8 | 1,069 | 1962 | 20 September 1962
row 3 : Farrer | 3,360 | 41 years | 2.7 persons | 2.1 | 1,600 | 1967 | 12 May 1966
row 4 : Garran | 3,175 | 39 years | 2.5 persons | 2.7 | 1,175 | 1966 | 12 May 1966
row 5 : Hughes | 2,898 | 41 years | 2.5 persons | 1.8 | 1,610 | 1963 | 20 September 1962
row 6 : Isaacs | 2,424 | 45 years | 2.6 persons | 3.1 | 781 | 1986 | 12 May 1966
row 7 : Lyons | 2,444 | 38 years | 2.1 persons | 2.3 | 1,062 | 1965 | 20 September 1962
row 8 : Mawson | 2,861 | 40 years | 2.2 persons | 2.1 | 1,362 | 1967 | 12 May 1966
row 9 : O'Malley | 684 | 47 years | 3.1 persons | 2.6 | 263 | 1973 | 12 May 1966
row 10 : Pearce | 2,509 | 41 years | 2.3 persons | 1.7 | 1,475 | 1967 | 12 May 1966
row 11 : Phillip | 1,910 | 32 years | 1.7 persons | 2.6 | 734 | 1966 | 12 May 1966
row 12 : Torrens | 2,265 | 38 years | 2.6 persons | 1.3 | 1,742 | 1966 | 12 May 1966 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What is the Area with a Median Age of 38 years, a Population of 2,444, and a Date First Settles as a Suburb prior to 1965?

Answer: none
[Table] header: Suburb | Population (in 2008) | Median age (in 2006) | Mean household size (in 2006) | Area (km²) | Density (/km²) | Date first settled as a suburb | Gazetted as a Division Name row 1 : Chifley | 2,325 | 36 years | 2.3 persons | 1.6 | 1,453 | 1966 | 12 May 1966
row 2 : Curtin | 5,133 | 41 years | 2.5 persons | 4.8 | 1,069 | 1962 | 20 September 1962
row 3 : Farrer | 3,360 | 41 years | 2.7 persons | 2.1 | 1,600 | 1967 | 12 May 1966
row 4 : Garran | 3,175 | 39 years | 2.5 persons | 2.7 | 1,175 | 1966 | 12 May 1966
row 5 : Hughes | 2,898 | 41 years | 2.5 persons | 1.8 | 1,610 | 1963 | 20 September 1962
row 6 : Isaacs | 2,424 | 45 years | 2.6 persons | 3.1 | 781 | 1986 | 12 May 1966
row 7 : Lyons | 2,444 | 38 years | 2.1 persons | 2.3 | 1,062 | 1965 | 20 September 1962
row 8 : Mawson | 2,861 | 40 years | 2.2 persons | 2.1 | 1,362 | 1967 | 12 May 1966
row 9 : O'Malley | 684 | 47 years | 3.1 persons | 2.6 | 263 | 1973 | 12 May 1966
row 10 : Pearce | 2,509 | 41 years | 2.3 persons | 1.7 | 1,475 | 1967 | 12 May 1966
row 11 : Phillip | 1,910 | 32 years | 1.7 persons | 2.6 | 734 | 1966 | 12 May 1966
row 12 : Torrens | 2,265 | 38 years | 2.6 persons | 1.3 | 1,742 | 1966 | 12 May 1966 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What is the highest Area that has a Mean Household Size of 3.1 persons?

Answer: 2.6
[Table] header: Date | Opponent | Result | Kickoff [a ] | Game site | Attendance row 1 : Date | Opponent | Result | Kickoff [a ] | Game site | Attendance
row 2 : September 5, 1981 | Minnesota Vikings | W 21-13 | 9:00 | Tampa Stadium | 66,287
row 3 : September 13, 1981 | at Kansas City Chiefs | L 19-10 | 1:00 | Arrowhead Stadium | 50,555
row 4 : September 20, 1981 | at Chicago Bears | L 28-17 | 1:00 | Tampa Stadium | 60,130
row 5 : September 27, 1981 | St. Louis Cardinals | W 20-10 | 4:00 | Tampa Stadium | 65,850
row 6 : October 4, 1981 | Detroit Lions | W 28-10 | 4:00 | Tampa Stadium | 71,733
row 7 : October 11, 1981 | at Green Bay Packers | W 21-10 | 1:00 | Lambeau Field | 52,264
row 8 : October 18, 1981 | at Oakland Raiders | L 18-16 | 4:00 | Oakland-Alameda County Colise | 42,288
row 9 : October 25, 1981 | at Philadelphia Eagles | L 20-10 | 1:00 | Veterans Stadium | 70,174
row 10 : November 1, 1981 | Chicago Bears | W 20-10 | 1:00 | Tampa Stadium | 68,688
row 11 : November 8, 1981 | at Minnesota Vikings | L 25-10 | 1:00 | Metropolitan Stadium | 47,038
row 12 : November 15, 1981 | Denver Broncos | L 24-7 | 1:00 | Tampa Stadium | 64,518
row 13 : November 22, 1981 | Green Bay Packers | W 37-3 | 1:00 | Tampa Stadium | 63,251
row 14 : November 29, 1981 | at New Orleans Saints | W 31-14 | 1:00 | Louisiana Superdome | 62,209
row 15 : December 6, 1981 | Atlanta Falcons | W 24-23 | 4:00 | Tampa Stadium | 69,221
row 16 : December 13, 1981 | San Diego Chargers | L 24-23 | 1:00 | Tampa Stadium | 67,388
row 17 : December 20, 1981 | at Detroit Lions | W 20-17 | 1:00 | Pontiac Silverdome | 80,444
row 18 : NFC Divisional Playoff | NFC Divisional Playoff | NFC Divisional Playoff | NFC Divisional Playoff | NFC Divisional Playoff | NFC Divisional Playoff
row 19 : Date | Opponent | Result | Kickoff | Game site | Attendance
row 20 : January 2, 1982 | at Dallas Cowboys | L 0-38 | 1:00 | Texas Stadium | 64,848 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: Which game site Kickoff [a] of 1:00, and an Attendance of 63,251?

Answer: Tampa Stadium
[Table] header: Date | Opponent | Result | Kickoff [a ] | Game site | Attendance row 1 : Date | Opponent | Result | Kickoff [a ] | Game site | Attendance
row 2 : September 5, 1981 | Minnesota Vikings | W 21-13 | 9:00 | Tampa Stadium | 66,287
row 3 : September 13, 1981 | at Kansas City Chiefs | L 19-10 | 1:00 | Arrowhead Stadium | 50,555
row 4 : September 20, 1981 | at Chicago Bears | L 28-17 | 1:00 | Tampa Stadium | 60,130
row 5 : September 27, 1981 | St. Louis Cardinals | W 20-10 | 4:00 | Tampa Stadium | 65,850
row 6 : October 4, 1981 | Detroit Lions | W 28-10 | 4:00 | Tampa Stadium | 71,733
row 7 : October 11, 1981 | at Green Bay Packers | W 21-10 | 1:00 | Lambeau Field | 52,264
row 8 : October 18, 1981 | at Oakland Raiders | L 18-16 | 4:00 | Oakland-Alameda County Colise | 42,288
row 9 : October 25, 1981 | at Philadelphia Eagles | L 20-10 | 1:00 | Veterans Stadium | 70,174
row 10 : November 1, 1981 | Chicago Bears | W 20-10 | 1:00 | Tampa Stadium | 68,688
row 11 : November 8, 1981 | at Minnesota Vikings | L 25-10 | 1:00 | Metropolitan Stadium | 47,038
row 12 : November 15, 1981 | Denver Broncos | L 24-7 | 1:00 | Tampa Stadium | 64,518
row 13 : November 22, 1981 | Green Bay Packers | W 37-3 | 1:00 | Tampa Stadium | 63,251
row 14 : November 29, 1981 | at New Orleans Saints | W 31-14 | 1:00 | Louisiana Superdome | 62,209
row 15 : December 6, 1981 | Atlanta Falcons | W 24-23 | 4:00 | Tampa Stadium | 69,221
row 16 : December 13, 1981 | San Diego Chargers | L 24-23 | 1:00 | Tampa Stadium | 67,388
row 17 : December 20, 1981 | at Detroit Lions | W 20-17 | 1:00 | Pontiac Silverdome | 80,444
row 18 : NFC Divisional Playoff | NFC Divisional Playoff | NFC Divisional Playoff | NFC Divisional Playoff | NFC Divisional Playoff | NFC Divisional Playoff
row 19 : Date | Opponent | Result | Kickoff | Game site | Attendance
row 20 : January 2, 1982 | at Dallas Cowboys | L 0-38 | 1:00 | Texas Stadium | 64,848 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: Which date has a Kickoff [a] of 4:00, and an Opponent of detroit lions?

Answer: October 4, 1981
[Table] header: Week | Date | Opponent | Result | Kickoff [a ] | Game site | Attendance | Record row 1 : Week | Date | Opponent | Result | Kickoff [a ] | Game site | Attendance | Record
row 2 : 1 | September 4, 1994 | at Chicago Bears | L 21–9 | 1:00 | Soldier Field | 61,844 | 0–1
row 3 : 2 | September 11, 1994 | Indianapolis Colts | W 24–10 | 1:00 | Tampa Stadium | 36,631* | 1–1
row 4 : 3 | September 18, 1994 | New Orleans Saints | L 9–7 | 1:00 | Tampa Stadium | 45,522* | 1–2
row 5 : 4 | September 25, 1994 | at Green Bay Packers | L 30–3 | 1:00 | Lambeau Field | 58,551 | 1–3
row 6 : 5 | October 2, 1994 | Detroit Lions | W 24–14 | 1:00 | Tampa Stadium | 38,012* | 2–3
row 7 : 6 | October 9, 1994 | at Atlanta Falcons | L 34–13 | 1:00 | Georgia Dome | 52,633 | 2–4
row 8 : 7 | Bye | Bye | Bye | Bye | Bye | Bye | Bye
row 9 : 8 | October 23, 1994 | at San Francisco 49ers | L 41–16 | 4:00 | Candlestick Park | 62,741 | 2–5
row 10 : 9 | October 30, 1994 | Minnesota Vikings | L 36–13 | 4:00 | Tampa Stadium | 42,110* | 2–6
row 11 : 10 | November 6, 1994 | Chicago Bears | L 20–6 | 1:00 | Tampa Stadium | 60,821* | 2–7
row 12 : 11 | November 13, 1994 | at Detroit Lions | L 14–9 | 8:00 | Pontiac Silverdome | 50,814 | 2–8
row 13 : 12 | November 20, 1994 | at Seattle Seahawks | L 22–21 | 4:00 | The Kingdome | 37,466 | 2–9
row 14 : 13 | November 27, 1994 | at Minnesota Vikings | W 20–17 OT | 1:00 | Hubert H. Humphrey Metrodom | 47,259 | 3–9
row 15 : 14 | December 4, 1994 | Washington Redskins | W 26–21 | 1:00 | Tampa Stadium | 45,121* | 4–9
row 16 : 15 | December 11, 1994 | Los Angeles Rams | W 24–14 | 1:00 | Tampa Stadium | 34,150* | 5–9
row 17 : 16 | December 18, 1994 | at Washington Redskins | W 17–14 | 1:00 | RFK Stadium | 47,315 | 6–9
row 18 : 17 | December 24, 1994 | Green Bay Packers | L 34–19 | 1:00 | Tampa Stadium | 65,076* | 6–10 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What is the attendance in week 15?

Answer: 34,150*
[Table] header: Driver | Constructor | Laps | Time/Retired | Grid row 1 : David Coulthard | McLaren - Mercedes | 72 | 1:38:05.538 | 2
row 2 : Mika Häkkinen | McLaren - Mercedes | 72 | +14.748 | 4
row 3 : Rubens Barrichello | Ferrari | 72 | +32.409 | 3
row 4 : Jacques Villeneuve | BAR - Honda | 72 | +1:01.322 | 7
row 5 : Ralf Schumacher | Williams - BMW | 72 | +1:03.981 | 5
row 6 : Jarno Trulli | Jordan - Mugen-Honda | 72 | +1:15.605 | 9
row 7 : Heinz-Harald Frentzen | Jordan - Mugen-Honda | 71 | +1 Lap | 8
row 8 : Jenson Button | Williams - BMW | 71 | +1 Lap | 10
row 9 : Giancarlo Fisichella | Benetton - Playlife | 71 | +1 Lap | 14
row 10 : Mika Salo | Sauber - Petronas | 71 | +1 Lap | 12
row 11 : Pedro Diniz | Sauber - Petronas | 71 | +1 Lap | 15
row 12 : Nick Heidfeld | Prost - Peugeot | 71 | +1 Lap | 16
row 13 : Eddie Irvine | Jaguar - Cosworth | 70 | +2 Laps | 6
row 14 : Jean Alesi | Prost - Peugeot | 70 | +2 Laps | 18
row 15 : Marc Gené | Minardi - Fondmetal | 70 | +2 Laps | 21
row 16 : Michael Schumacher | Ferrari | 58 | Engine | 1
row 17 : Pedro de la Rosa | Arrows - Supertec | 45 | Transmission | 13
row 18 : Alexander Wurz | Benetton - Playlife | 34 | Spun off | 17
row 19 : Gastón Mazzacane | Minardi - Fondmetal | 31 | Spun off | 22
row 20 : Jos Verstappen | Arrows - Supertec | 25 | Transmission | 20
row 21 : Johnny Herbert | Jaguar - Cosworth | 20 | Gearbox | 11
row 22 : Ricardo Zonta | BAR - Honda | 16 | Spun off | 19 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What is the lowest number of laps obtained by driver Nick Heidfeld?

Answer: 71.0
[Table] header: Jurisdiction | Voted Yes | Percent Yes | Voted No | Percent No row 1 : Alberta | 483,275 | 39.8 | 731,975 | 60.2
row 2 : British Columbia | 525,188 | 31.8 | 1,126,761 | 68.2
row 3 : Manitoba | 198,230 | 38.0 | 322,971 | 62.0
row 4 : New Brunswick | 23,010 | 61.7 | 145,096 | 38.3
row 5 : Newfoundland | 133,193 | 63.1 | 77,881 | 36.9
row 6 : Northwest Territories | 14,750 | 61.0 | 9,416 | 39.0
row 7 : Nova Scotia | 218,618 | 48.7 | 230,182 | 51.3
row 8 : Ontario | 2,410,119 | 50.1 | 2,397,665 | 49.9
row 9 : Prince Edward Island | 48,687 | 74.0 | 17,124 | 26.0
row 10 : Quebec | 1,710,117 | 43.4 | 2,232,280 | 56.6
row 11 : Saskatchewan | 203,361 | 44.6 | 252,459 | 55.4
row 12 : Yukon | 5,354 | 43.6 | 6,922 | 56.4
row 13 : Canada | 6,185,902 | 45.0 | 7,550,732 | 55.0 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What is the percent yes of Nova Scotia, which had more than 2,410,119 vote yes and less than 51.3 vote no?

Answer: 0.0
[Table] header: Jurisdiction | Voted Yes | Percent Yes | Voted No | Percent No row 1 : Alberta | 483,275 | 39.8 | 731,975 | 60.2
row 2 : British Columbia | 525,188 | 31.8 | 1,126,761 | 68.2
row 3 : Manitoba | 198,230 | 38.0 | 322,971 | 62.0
row 4 : New Brunswick | 23,010 | 61.7 | 145,096 | 38.3
row 5 : Newfoundland | 133,193 | 63.1 | 77,881 | 36.9
row 6 : Northwest Territories | 14,750 | 61.0 | 9,416 | 39.0
row 7 : Nova Scotia | 218,618 | 48.7 | 230,182 | 51.3
row 8 : Ontario | 2,410,119 | 50.1 | 2,397,665 | 49.9
row 9 : Prince Edward Island | 48,687 | 74.0 | 17,124 | 26.0
row 10 : Quebec | 1,710,117 | 43.4 | 2,232,280 | 56.6
row 11 : Saskatchewan | 203,361 | 44.6 | 252,459 | 55.4
row 12 : Yukon | 5,354 | 43.6 | 6,922 | 56.4
row 13 : Canada | 6,185,902 | 45.0 | 7,550,732 | 55.0 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What is the percent yes of Alberta, which had a percent no larger than 60.2?

Answer: 0.0
[Table] header: Jurisdiction | Voted Yes | Percent Yes | Voted No | Percent No row 1 : Alberta | 483,275 | 39.8 | 731,975 | 60.2
row 2 : British Columbia | 525,188 | 31.8 | 1,126,761 | 68.2
row 3 : Manitoba | 198,230 | 38.0 | 322,971 | 62.0
row 4 : New Brunswick | 23,010 | 61.7 | 145,096 | 38.3
row 5 : Newfoundland | 133,193 | 63.1 | 77,881 | 36.9
row 6 : Northwest Territories | 14,750 | 61.0 | 9,416 | 39.0
row 7 : Nova Scotia | 218,618 | 48.7 | 230,182 | 51.3
row 8 : Ontario | 2,410,119 | 50.1 | 2,397,665 | 49.9
row 9 : Prince Edward Island | 48,687 | 74.0 | 17,124 | 26.0
row 10 : Quebec | 1,710,117 | 43.4 | 2,232,280 | 56.6
row 11 : Saskatchewan | 203,361 | 44.6 | 252,459 | 55.4
row 12 : Yukon | 5,354 | 43.6 | 6,922 | 56.4
row 13 : Canada | 6,185,902 | 45.0 | 7,550,732 | 55.0 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What is the total number of yes votes in Newfoundland, which had less than 77,881 vote no?

Answer: 0.0
[Table] header: Jurisdiction | Voted Yes | Percent Yes | Voted No | Percent No row 1 : Alberta | 483,275 | 39.8 | 731,975 | 60.2
row 2 : British Columbia | 525,188 | 31.8 | 1,126,761 | 68.2
row 3 : Manitoba | 198,230 | 38.0 | 322,971 | 62.0
row 4 : New Brunswick | 23,010 | 61.7 | 145,096 | 38.3
row 5 : Newfoundland | 133,193 | 63.1 | 77,881 | 36.9
row 6 : Northwest Territories | 14,750 | 61.0 | 9,416 | 39.0
row 7 : Nova Scotia | 218,618 | 48.7 | 230,182 | 51.3
row 8 : Ontario | 2,410,119 | 50.1 | 2,397,665 | 49.9
row 9 : Prince Edward Island | 48,687 | 74.0 | 17,124 | 26.0
row 10 : Quebec | 1,710,117 | 43.4 | 2,232,280 | 56.6
row 11 : Saskatchewan | 203,361 | 44.6 | 252,459 | 55.4
row 12 : Yukon | 5,354 | 43.6 | 6,922 | 56.4
row 13 : Canada | 6,185,902 | 45.0 | 7,550,732 | 55.0 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What is the highest percent of yes Alberta, which had less than 60.2 vote no, has?

Answer: none
[Table] header: Jurisdiction | Voted Yes | Percent Yes | Voted No | Percent No row 1 : Alberta | 483,275 | 39.8 | 731,975 | 60.2
row 2 : British Columbia | 525,188 | 31.8 | 1,126,761 | 68.2
row 3 : Manitoba | 198,230 | 38.0 | 322,971 | 62.0
row 4 : New Brunswick | 23,010 | 61.7 | 145,096 | 38.3
row 5 : Newfoundland | 133,193 | 63.1 | 77,881 | 36.9
row 6 : Northwest Territories | 14,750 | 61.0 | 9,416 | 39.0
row 7 : Nova Scotia | 218,618 | 48.7 | 230,182 | 51.3
row 8 : Ontario | 2,410,119 | 50.1 | 2,397,665 | 49.9
row 9 : Prince Edward Island | 48,687 | 74.0 | 17,124 | 26.0
row 10 : Quebec | 1,710,117 | 43.4 | 2,232,280 | 56.6
row 11 : Saskatchewan | 203,361 | 44.6 | 252,459 | 55.4
row 12 : Yukon | 5,354 | 43.6 | 6,922 | 56.4
row 13 : Canada | 6,185,902 | 45.0 | 7,550,732 | 55.0 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What is the highest percent yes in Alberta, which had less than 5,354 vote yes and less than 731,975 vote no?

Answer: none
[Table] header: Home team | Home team score | Away team | Away team score | Venue | Crowd | Date row 1 : Footscray | 9.16 (70) | St Kilda | 13.14 (92) | Western Oval | 16,000 | 18 May 1940
row 2 : Carlton | 13.12 (90) | Melbourne | 16.20 (116) | Princes Park | 18,000 | 18 May 1940
row 3 : South Melbourne | 22.13 (145) | Hawthorn | 16.10 (106) | Lake Oval | 9,000 | 18 May 1940
row 4 : Richmond | 17.15 (117) | Geelong | 11.6 (72) | Punt Road Oval | 13,000 | 18 May 1940
row 5 : Fitzroy | 12.15 (87) | Essendon | 10.16 (76) | Brunswick Street Oval | 13,000 | 18 May 1940
row 6 : North Melbourne | 14.15 (99) | Collingwood | 10.15 (75) | Arden Street Oval | 11,000 | 18 May 1940 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What team was the away team when Footscray was the home team?

Answer: St Kilda
[Table] header: Home team | Home team score | Away team | Away team score | Venue | Crowd | Date row 1 : Footscray | 9.16 (70) | St Kilda | 13.14 (92) | Western Oval | 16,000 | 18 May 1940
row 2 : Carlton | 13.12 (90) | Melbourne | 16.20 (116) | Princes Park | 18,000 | 18 May 1940
row 3 : South Melbourne | 22.13 (145) | Hawthorn | 16.10 (106) | Lake Oval | 9,000 | 18 May 1940
row 4 : Richmond | 17.15 (117) | Geelong | 11.6 (72) | Punt Road Oval | 13,000 | 18 May 1940
row 5 : Fitzroy | 12.15 (87) | Essendon | 10.16 (76) | Brunswick Street Oval | 13,000 | 18 May 1940
row 6 : North Melbourne | 14.15 (99) | Collingwood | 10.15 (75) | Arden Street Oval | 11,000 | 18 May 1940 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What was the size of the crowd when North Melbourne was the home team?

Answer: 11000.0
[Table] header: Home team | Home team score | Away team | Away team score | Venue | Crowd | Date row 1 : Footscray | 9.16 (70) | St Kilda | 13.14 (92) | Western Oval | 16,000 | 18 May 1940
row 2 : Carlton | 13.12 (90) | Melbourne | 16.20 (116) | Princes Park | 18,000 | 18 May 1940
row 3 : South Melbourne | 22.13 (145) | Hawthorn | 16.10 (106) | Lake Oval | 9,000 | 18 May 1940
row 4 : Richmond | 17.15 (117) | Geelong | 11.6 (72) | Punt Road Oval | 13,000 | 18 May 1940
row 5 : Fitzroy | 12.15 (87) | Essendon | 10.16 (76) | Brunswick Street Oval | 13,000 | 18 May 1940
row 6 : North Melbourne | 14.15 (99) | Collingwood | 10.15 (75) | Arden Street Oval | 11,000 | 18 May 1940 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What date were there more than 16,000 people in the crowd and Carlton was the home team?

Answer: 18 May 1940
[Table] header: Home team | Home team score | Away team | Away team score | Venue | Crowd | Date row 1 : Footscray | 9.16 (70) | St Kilda | 13.14 (92) | Western Oval | 16,000 | 18 May 1940
row 2 : Carlton | 13.12 (90) | Melbourne | 16.20 (116) | Princes Park | 18,000 | 18 May 1940
row 3 : South Melbourne | 22.13 (145) | Hawthorn | 16.10 (106) | Lake Oval | 9,000 | 18 May 1940
row 4 : Richmond | 17.15 (117) | Geelong | 11.6 (72) | Punt Road Oval | 13,000 | 18 May 1940
row 5 : Fitzroy | 12.15 (87) | Essendon | 10.16 (76) | Brunswick Street Oval | 13,000 | 18 May 1940
row 6 : North Melbourne | 14.15 (99) | Collingwood | 10.15 (75) | Arden Street Oval | 11,000 | 18 May 1940 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What was the largest crowd when Collingwood was the away team?

Answer: 11000.0
[Table] header: Year | Tournament | Venue | Result | Extra row 1 : 1966 | European Championships | Budapest , Hungary | 4th | Decathlon
row 2 : 1966 | European Junior Championships | Odessa , Soviet Union | 1st | Long jump
row 3 : 1969 | European Championships | Athens , Greece | 6th | Long jump
row 4 : 1971 | European Championships | Helsinki , Finland | 1st | Long jump
row 5 : 1972 | European Indoor Championships | Grenoble , France | 1st | Long jump
row 6 : 1972 | Olympic Games | Munich , West Germany | 6th | Long jump
row 7 : 1973 | European Indoor Championships | Rotterdam , Netherlands | 2nd | Long jump
row 8 : 1974 | European Indoor Championships | Gothenburg , Sweden | 3rd | Long jump
row 9 : 1974 | European Championships | Rome , Italy | 7th | Long jump [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What year is the result 6th in munich, west germany?

Answer: 1972.0
[Table] header: Year | Tournament | Venue | Result | Extra row 1 : 1966 | European Championships | Budapest , Hungary | 4th | Decathlon
row 2 : 1966 | European Junior Championships | Odessa , Soviet Union | 1st | Long jump
row 3 : 1969 | European Championships | Athens , Greece | 6th | Long jump
row 4 : 1971 | European Championships | Helsinki , Finland | 1st | Long jump
row 5 : 1972 | European Indoor Championships | Grenoble , France | 1st | Long jump
row 6 : 1972 | Olympic Games | Munich , West Germany | 6th | Long jump
row 7 : 1973 | European Indoor Championships | Rotterdam , Netherlands | 2nd | Long jump
row 8 : 1974 | European Indoor Championships | Gothenburg , Sweden | 3rd | Long jump
row 9 : 1974 | European Championships | Rome , Italy | 7th | Long jump [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What year is the event in athens, greece?

Answer: 1969.0
[Table] header: Year | Tournament | Venue | Result | Extra row 1 : 1966 | European Championships | Budapest , Hungary | 4th | Decathlon
row 2 : 1966 | European Junior Championships | Odessa , Soviet Union | 1st | Long jump
row 3 : 1969 | European Championships | Athens , Greece | 6th | Long jump
row 4 : 1971 | European Championships | Helsinki , Finland | 1st | Long jump
row 5 : 1972 | European Indoor Championships | Grenoble , France | 1st | Long jump
row 6 : 1972 | Olympic Games | Munich , West Germany | 6th | Long jump
row 7 : 1973 | European Indoor Championships | Rotterdam , Netherlands | 2nd | Long jump
row 8 : 1974 | European Indoor Championships | Gothenburg , Sweden | 3rd | Long jump
row 9 : 1974 | European Championships | Rome , Italy | 7th | Long jump [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What year is the venue in budapest, hungary?

Answer: 1966.0
[Table] header: Year | Tournament | Venue | Result | Extra row 1 : 1966 | European Championships | Budapest , Hungary | 4th | Decathlon
row 2 : 1966 | European Junior Championships | Odessa , Soviet Union | 1st | Long jump
row 3 : 1969 | European Championships | Athens , Greece | 6th | Long jump
row 4 : 1971 | European Championships | Helsinki , Finland | 1st | Long jump
row 5 : 1972 | European Indoor Championships | Grenoble , France | 1st | Long jump
row 6 : 1972 | Olympic Games | Munich , West Germany | 6th | Long jump
row 7 : 1973 | European Indoor Championships | Rotterdam , Netherlands | 2nd | Long jump
row 8 : 1974 | European Indoor Championships | Gothenburg , Sweden | 3rd | Long jump
row 9 : 1974 | European Championships | Rome , Italy | 7th | Long jump [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What tournament is in 1971?

Answer: European Championships
[Table] header: Year | Tournament | Venue | Result | Extra row 1 : 1966 | European Championships | Budapest , Hungary | 4th | Decathlon
row 2 : 1966 | European Junior Championships | Odessa , Soviet Union | 1st | Long jump
row 3 : 1969 | European Championships | Athens , Greece | 6th | Long jump
row 4 : 1971 | European Championships | Helsinki , Finland | 1st | Long jump
row 5 : 1972 | European Indoor Championships | Grenoble , France | 1st | Long jump
row 6 : 1972 | Olympic Games | Munich , West Germany | 6th | Long jump
row 7 : 1973 | European Indoor Championships | Rotterdam , Netherlands | 2nd | Long jump
row 8 : 1974 | European Indoor Championships | Gothenburg , Sweden | 3rd | Long jump
row 9 : 1974 | European Championships | Rome , Italy | 7th | Long jump [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What is the extra result associated with 6th place in 1972?

Answer: Long jump
[Table] header: Home team | Home team score | Away team | Away team score | Venue | Crowd | Date row 1 : St Kilda | 10.9 (69) | South Melbourne | 9.16 (70) | Junction Oval | 13,000 | 9 July 1932
row 2 : Footscray | 7.15 (57) | Geelong | 8.8 (56) | Western Oval | 9,500 | 9 July 1932
row 3 : Collingwood | 14.6 (90) | Richmond | 11.12 (78) | Victoria Park | 20,000 | 9 July 1932
row 4 : Carlton | 21.16 (142) | Essendon | 11.11 (77) | Princes Park | 15,000 | 9 July 1932
row 5 : North Melbourne | 14.22 (106) | Hawthorn | 8.11 (59) | Arden Street Oval | 6,000 | 9 July 1932
row 6 : Melbourne | 15.12 (102) | Fitzroy | 13.12 (90) | MCG | 9,807 | 9 July 1932 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: When did Collingwood play?

Answer: 9 July 1932
[Table] header: Home team | Home team score | Away team | Away team score | Venue | Crowd | Date row 1 : St Kilda | 10.9 (69) | South Melbourne | 9.16 (70) | Junction Oval | 13,000 | 9 July 1932
row 2 : Footscray | 7.15 (57) | Geelong | 8.8 (56) | Western Oval | 9,500 | 9 July 1932
row 3 : Collingwood | 14.6 (90) | Richmond | 11.12 (78) | Victoria Park | 20,000 | 9 July 1932
row 4 : Carlton | 21.16 (142) | Essendon | 11.11 (77) | Princes Park | 15,000 | 9 July 1932
row 5 : North Melbourne | 14.22 (106) | Hawthorn | 8.11 (59) | Arden Street Oval | 6,000 | 9 July 1932
row 6 : Melbourne | 15.12 (102) | Fitzroy | 13.12 (90) | MCG | 9,807 | 9 July 1932 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: How many were in the crowd when there was a game at Junction Oval?

Answer: 13000.0
[Table] header: Date | Venue | Score | Result | Competition row 1 : 2 September 2006 | Cairo International Stadium , Cairo | 2–0 | 4–1 | 2008 Africa Cup of Nations qualification
row 2 : 22 January 2008 | Baba Yara Stadium , Kumas | 1–0 | 4–2 | 2008 Africa Cup of Nations
row 3 : 22 January 2008 | Baba Yara Stadium , Kumas | 4–1 | 4–2 | 2008 Africa Cup of Nations
row 4 : 26 January 2008 | Baba Yara Stadium , Kumas | 1–0 | 3–0 | 2008 Africa Cup of Nations
row 5 : 4 February 2008 | Baba Yara Stadium , Kumas | 1–0 | 2–1 | 2008 Africa Cup of Nations
row 6 : 6 June 2008 | Stade du Ville , Dji | 2–0 | 4–0 | 2010 World Cup qualifier
row 7 : 5 July 2009 | Military Academy Stadium , Cairo | 2–0 | 3–0 | 2010 World Cup qualifier
row 8 : 10 October 2009 | Konkola Stadium , Chililabombwe | 1–0 | 1–0 | 2010 World Cup qualifier
row 9 : 28 January 2010 | Complexo da Sr. da Graça | 1–0 | 4–0 | 2010 Africa Cup of Nations [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What is the Competition with a Score of 1–0, and a Result with 3–0?

Answer: 2008 Africa Cup of Nations
[Table] header: Date | Venue | Score | Result | Competition row 1 : 2 September 2006 | Cairo International Stadium , Cairo | 2–0 | 4–1 | 2008 Africa Cup of Nations qualification
row 2 : 22 January 2008 | Baba Yara Stadium , Kumas | 1–0 | 4–2 | 2008 Africa Cup of Nations
row 3 : 22 January 2008 | Baba Yara Stadium , Kumas | 4–1 | 4–2 | 2008 Africa Cup of Nations
row 4 : 26 January 2008 | Baba Yara Stadium , Kumas | 1–0 | 3–0 | 2008 Africa Cup of Nations
row 5 : 4 February 2008 | Baba Yara Stadium , Kumas | 1–0 | 2–1 | 2008 Africa Cup of Nations
row 6 : 6 June 2008 | Stade du Ville , Dji | 2–0 | 4–0 | 2010 World Cup qualifier
row 7 : 5 July 2009 | Military Academy Stadium , Cairo | 2–0 | 3–0 | 2010 World Cup qualifier
row 8 : 10 October 2009 | Konkola Stadium , Chililabombwe | 1–0 | 1–0 | 2010 World Cup qualifier
row 9 : 28 January 2010 | Complexo da Sr. da Graça | 1–0 | 4–0 | 2010 Africa Cup of Nations [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What is the Result with a Date with 22 january 2008?

Answer: 4–2, 4–2
[Table] header: Date | Visitor | Score | Home | Decision | Attendance | Record row 1 : February 2 | Florida | 3 – 2 | Tampa Bay | Ramo | 19,977 | 21–27–5
row 2 : February 5 | Tampa Bay | 5 – 4 | St. Louis | Holmqvist | 17,150 | 22–27–5
row 3 : February 7 | Tampa Bay | 5 – 4 | Nashville | Holmqvist | 13,959 | 23–27–5
row 4 : February 9 | Tampa Bay | 1 – 2 | Atlanta | Holmqvist | 18,879 | 23–27–6
row 5 : February 12 | Canadiens | 2 – 3 | Tampa Bay | Ramo | 17,420 | 24–27–6
row 6 : February 14 | Tampa Bay | 5 – 3 | Philadelphia | Holmqvist | 19,336 | 25–27–6
row 7 : February 16 | Capitals | 3 – 2 | Tampa Bay | Holmqvist | 20,254 | 25–28–6
row 8 : February 20 | Tampa Bay | 3 – 4 | Buffalo | Holmqvist | 18,690 | 25–28–7
row 9 : February 21 | Tampa Bay | 0 – 1 | NY Islanders | Ramo | 12,382 | 25–29–7
row 10 : February 23 | Boston | 5 – 3 | Tampa Bay | Holmqvist | 20,519 | 25–30–7
row 11 : February 27 | Minnesota | 3 – 2 | Tampa Bay | Smith | 17,211 | 25–31–7
row 12 : February 29 | Toronto | 2 – 3 | Tampa Bay | Smith | 20,641 | 26–31–7 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What was the decision of the Lightning game when the Canadiens were the away team?

Answer: Ramo
[Table] header: Date | Visitor | Score | Home | Decision | Attendance | Record row 1 : February 2 | Florida | 3 – 2 | Tampa Bay | Ramo | 19,977 | 21–27–5
row 2 : February 5 | Tampa Bay | 5 – 4 | St. Louis | Holmqvist | 17,150 | 22–27–5
row 3 : February 7 | Tampa Bay | 5 – 4 | Nashville | Holmqvist | 13,959 | 23–27–5
row 4 : February 9 | Tampa Bay | 1 – 2 | Atlanta | Holmqvist | 18,879 | 23–27–6
row 5 : February 12 | Canadiens | 2 – 3 | Tampa Bay | Ramo | 17,420 | 24–27–6
row 6 : February 14 | Tampa Bay | 5 – 3 | Philadelphia | Holmqvist | 19,336 | 25–27–6
row 7 : February 16 | Capitals | 3 – 2 | Tampa Bay | Holmqvist | 20,254 | 25–28–6
row 8 : February 20 | Tampa Bay | 3 – 4 | Buffalo | Holmqvist | 18,690 | 25–28–7
row 9 : February 21 | Tampa Bay | 0 – 1 | NY Islanders | Ramo | 12,382 | 25–29–7
row 10 : February 23 | Boston | 5 – 3 | Tampa Bay | Holmqvist | 20,519 | 25–30–7
row 11 : February 27 | Minnesota | 3 – 2 | Tampa Bay | Smith | 17,211 | 25–31–7
row 12 : February 29 | Toronto | 2 – 3 | Tampa Bay | Smith | 20,641 | 26–31–7 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What was the date of the 24–27–6 Lightning home game against Tampa Bay that had a decision of Ramo?

Answer: February 12
[Table] header: Week | Date | Opponent | Result | Attendance row 1 : 1 | September 3, 2000 | at New England Patriots | W 21-16 | 60,292
row 2 : 2 | September 10, 2000 | Chicago Bears | W 41-0 | 65,569
row 3 : 3 | September 17, 2000 | at Detroit Lions | W 31-10 | 76,928
row 4 : 4 | September 24, 2000 | New York Jets | L 21-17 | 65,619
row 5 : 5 | October 1, 2000 | at Washington Redskins | L 20-17 (OT) | 83,532
row 6 : 6 | October 9, 2000 | at Minnesota Vikings | L 30-23 | 64,162
row 7 : 7 | Bye | Bye | Bye | Bye
row 8 : 8 | October 19, 2000 | Detroit Lions | L 28-14 | 65,557
row 9 : 9 | October 29, 2000 | Minnesota Vikings | W 41-13 | 65,589
row 10 : 10 | November 5, 2000 | at Atlanta Falcons | W 27-14 | 70,097
row 11 : 11 | November 12, 2000 | Green Bay Packers | W 20-15 | 65,621
row 12 : 12 | November 19, 2000 | at Chicago Bears | L 13-10 | 66,944
row 13 : 13 | November 26, 2000 | Buffalo Bills | W 31-17 | 65,546
row 14 : 14 | December 3, 2000 | Dallas Cowboys | W 27-7 | 65,621
row 15 : 15 | December 10, 2000 | at Miami Dolphins | W 16-13 | 74,307
row 16 : 16 | December 18, 2000 | St. Louis Rams | W 38-35 | 65,653
row 17 : 17 | December 24, 2000 | at Green Bay Packers | L 17-14 (OT) | 59,692 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What week was October 29, 2000?

Answer: 1.0
[Table] header: Week | Date | Opponent | Result | Attendance row 1 : 1 | September 3, 2000 | at New England Patriots | W 21-16 | 60,292
row 2 : 2 | September 10, 2000 | Chicago Bears | W 41-0 | 65,569
row 3 : 3 | September 17, 2000 | at Detroit Lions | W 31-10 | 76,928
row 4 : 4 | September 24, 2000 | New York Jets | L 21-17 | 65,619
row 5 : 5 | October 1, 2000 | at Washington Redskins | L 20-17 (OT) | 83,532
row 6 : 6 | October 9, 2000 | at Minnesota Vikings | L 30-23 | 64,162
row 7 : 7 | Bye | Bye | Bye | Bye
row 8 : 8 | October 19, 2000 | Detroit Lions | L 28-14 | 65,557
row 9 : 9 | October 29, 2000 | Minnesota Vikings | W 41-13 | 65,589
row 10 : 10 | November 5, 2000 | at Atlanta Falcons | W 27-14 | 70,097
row 11 : 11 | November 12, 2000 | Green Bay Packers | W 20-15 | 65,621
row 12 : 12 | November 19, 2000 | at Chicago Bears | L 13-10 | 66,944
row 13 : 13 | November 26, 2000 | Buffalo Bills | W 31-17 | 65,546
row 14 : 14 | December 3, 2000 | Dallas Cowboys | W 27-7 | 65,621
row 15 : 15 | December 10, 2000 | at Miami Dolphins | W 16-13 | 74,307
row 16 : 16 | December 18, 2000 | St. Louis Rams | W 38-35 | 65,653
row 17 : 17 | December 24, 2000 | at Green Bay Packers | L 17-14 (OT) | 59,692 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: Who was the opponent on December 10, 2000?

Answer: at Miami Dolphins
[Table] header: Week | Date | Opponent | Result | Attendance row 1 : 1 | September 3, 2000 | at New England Patriots | W 21-16 | 60,292
row 2 : 2 | September 10, 2000 | Chicago Bears | W 41-0 | 65,569
row 3 : 3 | September 17, 2000 | at Detroit Lions | W 31-10 | 76,928
row 4 : 4 | September 24, 2000 | New York Jets | L 21-17 | 65,619
row 5 : 5 | October 1, 2000 | at Washington Redskins | L 20-17 (OT) | 83,532
row 6 : 6 | October 9, 2000 | at Minnesota Vikings | L 30-23 | 64,162
row 7 : 7 | Bye | Bye | Bye | Bye
row 8 : 8 | October 19, 2000 | Detroit Lions | L 28-14 | 65,557
row 9 : 9 | October 29, 2000 | Minnesota Vikings | W 41-13 | 65,589
row 10 : 10 | November 5, 2000 | at Atlanta Falcons | W 27-14 | 70,097
row 11 : 11 | November 12, 2000 | Green Bay Packers | W 20-15 | 65,621
row 12 : 12 | November 19, 2000 | at Chicago Bears | L 13-10 | 66,944
row 13 : 13 | November 26, 2000 | Buffalo Bills | W 31-17 | 65,546
row 14 : 14 | December 3, 2000 | Dallas Cowboys | W 27-7 | 65,621
row 15 : 15 | December 10, 2000 | at Miami Dolphins | W 16-13 | 74,307
row 16 : 16 | December 18, 2000 | St. Louis Rams | W 38-35 | 65,653
row 17 : 17 | December 24, 2000 | at Green Bay Packers | L 17-14 (OT) | 59,692 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: Who was the opponent on the game with a 65,569 attendance before week 12?

Answer: Chicago Bears
[Table] header: Week | Date | Opponent | Result | Attendance row 1 : 1 | September 3, 2000 | at New England Patriots | W 21-16 | 60,292
row 2 : 2 | September 10, 2000 | Chicago Bears | W 41-0 | 65,569
row 3 : 3 | September 17, 2000 | at Detroit Lions | W 31-10 | 76,928
row 4 : 4 | September 24, 2000 | New York Jets | L 21-17 | 65,619
row 5 : 5 | October 1, 2000 | at Washington Redskins | L 20-17 (OT) | 83,532
row 6 : 6 | October 9, 2000 | at Minnesota Vikings | L 30-23 | 64,162
row 7 : 7 | Bye | Bye | Bye | Bye
row 8 : 8 | October 19, 2000 | Detroit Lions | L 28-14 | 65,557
row 9 : 9 | October 29, 2000 | Minnesota Vikings | W 41-13 | 65,589
row 10 : 10 | November 5, 2000 | at Atlanta Falcons | W 27-14 | 70,097
row 11 : 11 | November 12, 2000 | Green Bay Packers | W 20-15 | 65,621
row 12 : 12 | November 19, 2000 | at Chicago Bears | L 13-10 | 66,944
row 13 : 13 | November 26, 2000 | Buffalo Bills | W 31-17 | 65,546
row 14 : 14 | December 3, 2000 | Dallas Cowboys | W 27-7 | 65,621
row 15 : 15 | December 10, 2000 | at Miami Dolphins | W 16-13 | 74,307
row 16 : 16 | December 18, 2000 | St. Louis Rams | W 38-35 | 65,653
row 17 : 17 | December 24, 2000 | at Green Bay Packers | L 17-14 (OT) | 59,692 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What week was September 24, 2000 on?

Answer: 4.0
[Table] header: model | max. motive power | max. torque at rpm | engine displacement | engine type | engine configuration & notes 0-100km/h row 1 : 2.0 | PS ( kW ; hp  | N·m ( lbf·f | cc ( cuin ) | B5202 FS | straight-5 [ 12.3 s]
row 2 : 2.0T | PS (kW; hp) | N·m (lbf·ft | cc (cuin) | B5204 T2 | straight-5 low pressure turbo [ 9.5 s
row 3 : 2.0 T5 | PS (kW; hp) | N·m (lbf·ft | cc (cuin) | B5204 T3 | straight-5 high pressure turbo
row 4 : 2.4 | PS (kW; hp) | N·m (lbf·ft | cc (cuin) | B5244 S | straight-5 [8.8 s]
row 5 : 2.5 | PS (kW; hp) | N·m (lbf·ft | cc (cuin) | B5252 FS | straight-5 [ 10.7 s]
row 6 : 2.5T AWD | PS (kW; hp) | N·m (lbf·ft | cc (cuin) | B5254 T | straight-5 low pressure turbo [ 7.5 s
row 7 : Base 2.4 | PS (kW; hp) | N·m (lbf·ft | cc (cuin) | B5242 S | straight-5
row 8 : Base 2.4 SE | PS (kW; hp) | N·m (lbf·ft | cc (cuin) | B5244 S2 | straight-5
row 9 : GLT | PS (kW; hp) | N·m (lbf·ft | cc (cuin) | B5244 T2 | straight-5 low pressure turbo
row 10 : 2.4 AWD | PS (kW; hp) | N·m (lbf·ft | cc (cuin) | B5244 T3 | straight-5 low pressure turbo
row 11 : 2.3 T5 | PS (kW; hp) | N·m (lbf·ft | cc (cuin) | B5234 T3 | straight-5 high pressure turbo [ 5.9-6.4
row 12 : R | PS (kW; hp) | N·m (lbf·ft | cc (cuin) | B5234 T2 | straight-5 high pressure turbo [ 5.9-6.4 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What is the engine configuration & notes 0-100km/h with a model with 2.3 t5?

Answer: straight-5 high pressure turbo [ 5.9-6.4
[Table] header: model | max. motive power | max. torque at rpm | engine displacement | engine type | engine configuration & notes 0-100km/h row 1 : 2.0 | PS ( kW ; hp  | N·m ( lbf·f | cc ( cuin ) | B5202 FS | straight-5 [ 12.3 s]
row 2 : 2.0T | PS (kW; hp) | N·m (lbf·ft | cc (cuin) | B5204 T2 | straight-5 low pressure turbo [ 9.5 s
row 3 : 2.0 T5 | PS (kW; hp) | N·m (lbf·ft | cc (cuin) | B5204 T3 | straight-5 high pressure turbo
row 4 : 2.4 | PS (kW; hp) | N·m (lbf·ft | cc (cuin) | B5244 S | straight-5 [8.8 s]
row 5 : 2.5 | PS (kW; hp) | N·m (lbf·ft | cc (cuin) | B5252 FS | straight-5 [ 10.7 s]
row 6 : 2.5T AWD | PS (kW; hp) | N·m (lbf·ft | cc (cuin) | B5254 T | straight-5 low pressure turbo [ 7.5 s
row 7 : Base 2.4 | PS (kW; hp) | N·m (lbf·ft | cc (cuin) | B5242 S | straight-5
row 8 : Base 2.4 SE | PS (kW; hp) | N·m (lbf·ft | cc (cuin) | B5244 S2 | straight-5
row 9 : GLT | PS (kW; hp) | N·m (lbf·ft | cc (cuin) | B5244 T2 | straight-5 low pressure turbo
row 10 : 2.4 AWD | PS (kW; hp) | N·m (lbf·ft | cc (cuin) | B5244 T3 | straight-5 low pressure turbo
row 11 : 2.3 T5 | PS (kW; hp) | N·m (lbf·ft | cc (cuin) | B5234 T3 | straight-5 high pressure turbo [ 5.9-6.4
row 12 : R | PS (kW; hp) | N·m (lbf·ft | cc (cuin) | B5234 T2 | straight-5 high pressure turbo [ 5.9-6.4 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What is the engine configuration & notes 0-100km/h with an engine type with b5252 fs?

Answer: straight-5 [ 10.7 s]
[Table] header: model | max. motive power | max. torque at rpm | engine displacement | engine type | engine configuration & notes 0-100km/h row 1 : 2.0 | PS ( kW ; hp  | N·m ( lbf·f | cc ( cuin ) | B5202 FS | straight-5 [ 12.3 s]
row 2 : 2.0T | PS (kW; hp) | N·m (lbf·ft | cc (cuin) | B5204 T2 | straight-5 low pressure turbo [ 9.5 s
row 3 : 2.0 T5 | PS (kW; hp) | N·m (lbf·ft | cc (cuin) | B5204 T3 | straight-5 high pressure turbo
row 4 : 2.4 | PS (kW; hp) | N·m (lbf·ft | cc (cuin) | B5244 S | straight-5 [8.8 s]
row 5 : 2.5 | PS (kW; hp) | N·m (lbf·ft | cc (cuin) | B5252 FS | straight-5 [ 10.7 s]
row 6 : 2.5T AWD | PS (kW; hp) | N·m (lbf·ft | cc (cuin) | B5254 T | straight-5 low pressure turbo [ 7.5 s
row 7 : Base 2.4 | PS (kW; hp) | N·m (lbf·ft | cc (cuin) | B5242 S | straight-5
row 8 : Base 2.4 SE | PS (kW; hp) | N·m (lbf·ft | cc (cuin) | B5244 S2 | straight-5
row 9 : GLT | PS (kW; hp) | N·m (lbf·ft | cc (cuin) | B5244 T2 | straight-5 low pressure turbo
row 10 : 2.4 AWD | PS (kW; hp) | N·m (lbf·ft | cc (cuin) | B5244 T3 | straight-5 low pressure turbo
row 11 : 2.3 T5 | PS (kW; hp) | N·m (lbf·ft | cc (cuin) | B5234 T3 | straight-5 high pressure turbo [ 5.9-6.4
row 12 : R | PS (kW; hp) | N·m (lbf·ft | cc (cuin) | B5234 T2 | straight-5 high pressure turbo [ 5.9-6.4 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What is the model with a engine type with b5244 s2?

Answer: Base 2.4 SE
[Table] header: model | max. motive power | max. torque at rpm | engine displacement | engine type | engine configuration & notes 0-100km/h row 1 : 2.0 | PS ( kW ; hp  | N·m ( lbf·f | cc ( cuin ) | B5202 FS | straight-5 [ 12.3 s]
row 2 : 2.0T | PS (kW; hp) | N·m (lbf·ft | cc (cuin) | B5204 T2 | straight-5 low pressure turbo [ 9.5 s
row 3 : 2.0 T5 | PS (kW; hp) | N·m (lbf·ft | cc (cuin) | B5204 T3 | straight-5 high pressure turbo
row 4 : 2.4 | PS (kW; hp) | N·m (lbf·ft | cc (cuin) | B5244 S | straight-5 [8.8 s]
row 5 : 2.5 | PS (kW; hp) | N·m (lbf·ft | cc (cuin) | B5252 FS | straight-5 [ 10.7 s]
row 6 : 2.5T AWD | PS (kW; hp) | N·m (lbf·ft | cc (cuin) | B5254 T | straight-5 low pressure turbo [ 7.5 s
row 7 : Base 2.4 | PS (kW; hp) | N·m (lbf·ft | cc (cuin) | B5242 S | straight-5
row 8 : Base 2.4 SE | PS (kW; hp) | N·m (lbf·ft | cc (cuin) | B5244 S2 | straight-5
row 9 : GLT | PS (kW; hp) | N·m (lbf·ft | cc (cuin) | B5244 T2 | straight-5 low pressure turbo
row 10 : 2.4 AWD | PS (kW; hp) | N·m (lbf·ft | cc (cuin) | B5244 T3 | straight-5 low pressure turbo
row 11 : 2.3 T5 | PS (kW; hp) | N·m (lbf·ft | cc (cuin) | B5234 T3 | straight-5 high pressure turbo [ 5.9-6.4
row 12 : R | PS (kW; hp) | N·m (lbf·ft | cc (cuin) | B5234 T2 | straight-5 high pressure turbo [ 5.9-6.4 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What is the engine type with a model with base 2.4?

Answer: B5242 S
[Table] header: Year | Theme | Artist | Composition | Mintage | Issue Price row 1 : 2002 | Triple Cameo Portraits of Queen Elizabeth II | Sheldon Beveridge | 58.33% gold, 41.67% | 999 | $1,095.95
row 2 : 2003 | The Great Seal of Canada | RCM Staff | 58.33% gold, 41.67% | 998 | $1,095.95
row 3 : 2004 | Quadruple Cameo Portraits of | Christie Paquet | 58.33% gold, 41.67% | 999 | $1,099.95
row 4 : 2005 | "Welcome Figure" Totem Pole | Richard Hunt, Ph. D. | 58.33% gold, 41.67% | 1,000 | $1,199.95
row 5 : 2006 | 80th Birthday of Queen Elizabeth II | Cosme Saffioti | 58.33% gold, 41.67% | 1,000 | $1,520.95
row 6 : 2006 | Crystal Snowflake | Konrad Wachelko | 58.33% gold, 41.67% | 1,000 | $1,520.95
row 7 : 2008 | Four Seasons Moon Mask | Jody Broomfield | 58.33% gold, 41.67% | 1,200 | $1,599.95
row 8 : 2009 | Gold Summer Moon Mask | Jody Broomfield | 58.33% gold, 41.67% | 1,200 | $1,949.95
row 9 : 2010 | Crystal Snowflake | Konrad Wachelko | 58.33% gold, 41.67% | 750 | $2,295.95 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What is the composition of the coin that was issued after 2008, had a mintage larger than 999, and was designed by Jody Broomfield?

Answer: 58.33% gold, 41.67%
[Table] header: Year | Theme | Artist | Composition | Mintage | Issue Price row 1 : 2002 | Triple Cameo Portraits of Queen Elizabeth II | Sheldon Beveridge | 58.33% gold, 41.67% | 999 | $1,095.95
row 2 : 2003 | The Great Seal of Canada | RCM Staff | 58.33% gold, 41.67% | 998 | $1,095.95
row 3 : 2004 | Quadruple Cameo Portraits of | Christie Paquet | 58.33% gold, 41.67% | 999 | $1,099.95
row 4 : 2005 | "Welcome Figure" Totem Pole | Richard Hunt, Ph. D. | 58.33% gold, 41.67% | 1,000 | $1,199.95
row 5 : 2006 | 80th Birthday of Queen Elizabeth II | Cosme Saffioti | 58.33% gold, 41.67% | 1,000 | $1,520.95
row 6 : 2006 | Crystal Snowflake | Konrad Wachelko | 58.33% gold, 41.67% | 1,000 | $1,520.95
row 7 : 2008 | Four Seasons Moon Mask | Jody Broomfield | 58.33% gold, 41.67% | 1,200 | $1,599.95
row 8 : 2009 | Gold Summer Moon Mask | Jody Broomfield | 58.33% gold, 41.67% | 1,200 | $1,949.95
row 9 : 2010 | Crystal Snowflake | Konrad Wachelko | 58.33% gold, 41.67% | 750 | $2,295.95 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What is the theme of the coin from before 2006?

Answer: Triple Cameo Portraits of Queen Elizabeth II, The Great Seal of Canada, Quadruple Cameo Portraits of, "Welcome Figure" Totem Pole
[Table] header: Race | Circuit | Date | Pole position | Fastest lap | Winning driver | Constructor | Tyre | Report row 1 : Monaco Grand Prix | Monaco | 14 May | Stirling Moss | Richie Ginther Stirling Moss | Stirling Moss | Lotus - Climax | D | Report
row 2 : Dutch Grand Prix | Zandvoort | 22 May | Phil Hill | Jim Clark | Wolfgang von Trips | Ferrari | D | Report
row 3 : Belgian Grand Prix | Spa-Francorchamps | 18 June | Phil Hill | Richie Ginther | Phil Hill | Ferrari | D | Report
row 4 : French Grand Prix | Reims | 2 July | Phil Hill | Phil Hill | Giancarlo Baghetti | Ferrari | D | Report
row 5 : British Grand Prix | Aintree | 15 July | Phil Hill | Tony Brooks | Wolfgang von Trips | Ferrari | D | Report
row 6 : German Grand Prix | Nürburgring | 6 August | Phil Hill | Phil Hill | Stirling Moss | Lotus - Climax | D | Report
row 7 : Italian Grand Prix | Monza | 10 September | Wolfgang von Trips | Giancarlo Baghetti | Phil Hill | Ferrari | D | Report
row 8 : United States Grand Prix | Watkins Glen | 8 October | Jack Brabham | Jack Brabham | Innes Ireland | Lotus - Climax | D | Report [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What was the Tyre for the German Grand Prix?

Answer: D