sail/symbolic-instruction-tuning huggingface dataset:
[Table] header: Season | Competition | Round | Opponent | Home | Away | Agg. row 1 : 1964–65 | Inter-Cities Fairs Cup | R1 | GAK | 3–2 | 6–0 | 9–2
row 2 : 1964–65 | Inter-Cities Fairs Cup | R2 | Roma | 1–1 | 0–1 | 1–2
row 3 : 1965–66 | Inter-Cities Fairs Cup | R1 | RFC Liège | 2–0 | 0–1 | 2–1
row 4 : 1965–66 | Inter-Cities Fairs Cup | R2 | Steagul Roşu Braşov | 2–2 | 0–1 | 2–3
row 5 : 1969–70 | Inter-Cities Fairs Cup | R1 | Charleroi | 1–3 | 1–2 | 2–5
row 6 : 1995–96 | Intertoto Cup | Group 6 | LASK Linz | 0–0 | – | –
row 7 : 1995–96 | Intertoto Cup | Group 6 | Keflavík | – | 0–0 | –
row 8 : 1995–96 | Intertoto Cup | Group 6 | Metz | 0–1 | – | –
row 9 : 1995–96 | Intertoto Cup | Group 6 | Partick Thistle | – | 2–1 | –
row 10 : 1997–98 | Cup Winners' Cup | QR | Sloga Jugomagnat | 2–0 | 2–1 | 4–1
row 11 : 1997–98 | Cup Winners' Cup | R1 | Tromsø | 3–2 | 2–4 | 5–6
row 12 : 2001–02 | Intertoto Cup | R1 | Pobeda | 1–2 | 1–1 | 2–3
row 13 : 2002–03 | Champions League | QR2 | Zalaegerszeg | 2–1 | 0–1 | 2–2 ( a )
row 14 : 2003–04 | Intertoto Cup | R1 | Koper | 2–2 | 0–1 | 2–3
row 15 : 2007–08 | Intertoto Cup | R1 | Vllaznia Shko | 2–1 | 0–1 | 2–2 ( a ) [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What was the aggregate total for the match against Koper?

Answer: 2–3
[Table] header: Year | Regular Season | Playoffs | Canadian Championship | CONCACAF Champions League row 1 : 2007 | 7th East; 13th Overall | Did not qualify | Began in 2008 | Began in 2008
row 2 : 2008 | 7th East; 12th Overall | Did not qualify | 2nd | Did not qualify
row 3 : 2009 | 5th East; 12th Overall | Did not qualify | Champion | Preliminary Round
row 4 : 2010 | 5th East; 11th Overall | Did not qualify | Champion | Group Stage
row 5 : 2011 | 8th East; 16th Overall | Did not qualify | Champion | Semifinals
row 6 : 2012 | 10th East; 19th Overall | Did not qualify | Champion | Group Stage
row 7 : 2013 | 9th East; 17th Overall | Did not qualify | Semifinals | Did not qualify
row 8 : Totals | 0 Playoff appearances | 0 MLS Cups | 4 Championships | 0 Championships [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What Canadian Championship had CONCACAF Champions League of semifinals?

Answer: Champion
[Table] header: Year | Regular Season | Playoffs | Canadian Championship | CONCACAF Champions League row 1 : 2007 | 7th East; 13th Overall | Did not qualify | Began in 2008 | Began in 2008
row 2 : 2008 | 7th East; 12th Overall | Did not qualify | 2nd | Did not qualify
row 3 : 2009 | 5th East; 12th Overall | Did not qualify | Champion | Preliminary Round
row 4 : 2010 | 5th East; 11th Overall | Did not qualify | Champion | Group Stage
row 5 : 2011 | 8th East; 16th Overall | Did not qualify | Champion | Semifinals
row 6 : 2012 | 10th East; 19th Overall | Did not qualify | Champion | Group Stage
row 7 : 2013 | 9th East; 17th Overall | Did not qualify | Semifinals | Did not qualify
row 8 : Totals | 0 Playoff appearances | 0 MLS Cups | 4 Championships | 0 Championships [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: Which regular season had the playoffs of 0 mls cups?

Answer: 0 Playoff appearances
[Table] header: Goal | Date | Score | Result | Competition row 1 : 1. | 22 October 2008 | 2–0 | 2–0 | Friendly
row 2 : 2. | 6 February 2009 | 1–0 | 1–0 | Friendly
row 3 : 3. | 11 February 2009 | 1–2 | 2–2 | 2010 WCQ
row 4 : 4. | 11 February 2009 | 2–2 | 2–2 | 2010 WCQ
row 5 : 5. | 27 May 2009 | 1–1 | 3–1 | Friendly
row 6 : 6. | 27 May 2009 | 3–1 | 3–1 | Friendly
row 7 : 7. | 3 July 2009 | 0–1 | 2–1 | 2009 Gold Cup
row 8 : 8. | 3 July 2009 | 1–2 | 2–1 | 2009 Gold Cup
row 9 : 9. | 16 January 2011 | 1–0 | 5–2 | 2011 Copa Centroamericana
row 10 : 10. | 12 June 2011 | 2–0 | 6–1 | 2011 Gold Cup
row 11 : 11. | 7 October 2011 | 1–0 | 2–1 | 2014 FIFA World Cup qualification
row 12 : 12. | 15 November 2011 | 1–0 | 4–0 | 2014 FIFA World Cup qualification
row 13 : 13. | 15 November 2011 | 2–0 | 4–0 | 2014 FIFA World Cup qualification
row 14 : 14. | 8 June 2012 | 2–2 | 2–2 | 2014 FIFA World Cup qualification
row 15 : 15. | 7 September 2012 | 2 – 1 | 2–2 | 2014 FIFA World Cup qualification
row 16 : 16. | 11 September 2012 | 1 – 1 | 3–2 | 2014 FIFA World Cup qualification [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What was the score with a goal of 16?

Answer: 1 – 1
[Table] header: Season | Overall | Slalom | Super G | Downhill | Combined row 1 : 1988 | 61 | — | 16 | 37 | —
row 2 : 1989 | 40 | — | 10 | — | —
row 3 : 1990 | 80 | — | 21 | — | —
row 4 : 1991 | 35 | — | 10 | 17 | —
row 5 : 1992 | 53 | — | 19 | 25 | —
row 6 : 1993 | 59 | — | 20 | 40 | 23
row 7 : 1994 | 27 | — | 17 | 14 | —
row 8 : 1995 | 8 | — | 14 | 1 | 11
row 9 : 1996 | 4 | — | 4 | 1 | —
row 10 : 1997 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What is the highest Super G, when Season is later than 1996?

Answer: 1.0
[Table] header: Season | Overall | Slalom | Super G | Downhill | Combined row 1 : 1988 | 61 | — | 16 | 37 | —
row 2 : 1989 | 40 | — | 10 | — | —
row 3 : 1990 | 80 | — | 21 | — | —
row 4 : 1991 | 35 | — | 10 | 17 | —
row 5 : 1992 | 53 | — | 19 | 25 | —
row 6 : 1993 | 59 | — | 20 | 40 | 23
row 7 : 1994 | 27 | — | 17 | 14 | —
row 8 : 1995 | 8 | — | 14 | 1 | 11
row 9 : 1996 | 4 | — | 4 | 1 | —
row 10 : 1997 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What is Combined, when Super G is less than 10, and when Overall is less than 4?

Answer: —
[Table] header: Season | Overall | Slalom | Super G | Downhill | Combined row 1 : 1988 | 61 | — | 16 | 37 | —
row 2 : 1989 | 40 | — | 10 | — | —
row 3 : 1990 | 80 | — | 21 | — | —
row 4 : 1991 | 35 | — | 10 | 17 | —
row 5 : 1992 | 53 | — | 19 | 25 | —
row 6 : 1993 | 59 | — | 20 | 40 | 23
row 7 : 1994 | 27 | — | 17 | 14 | —
row 8 : 1995 | 8 | — | 14 | 1 | 11
row 9 : 1996 | 4 | — | 4 | 1 | —
row 10 : 1997 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What is the highest Season, when Super G is 19?

Answer: 1992.0
[Table] header: Nat. | Name | Moving from | Type | Transfer window | Ends | Transfer fee row 1 : ARG | Arruabarrena | Villarreal | Transfer | Summer | 2010 | Free
row 2 : GRE | Pavlis | Youth system | Promotion | Summer | 2010 | —
row 3 : BRA | Manduca | Youth system | Transfer | Summer | 2010 | €750K
row 4 : BRA | Edson Ratinho | Mogi Mirim | Transfer | Summer | 2012 | €250K
row 5 : CAN MWI | Nsaliwa | Panionios | Transfer | Summer | 2010 | €450K
row 6 : BRA | Rivaldo | Olympiacos | Transfer | Summer | 2009 | Free
row 7 : GRE | Bourbos | Kerkyra | Loan Return | Summer | 2010 | —
row 8 : GRE | Zorbas | Niki Volos | Loan Return | Summer | 2011 | —
row 9 : CYP | Tofas | Ethnikos Piraeus | Loan Return | Summer | 2010 | —
row 10 : GRE | Koutromanos | Thrasyvoulos | Loan Return | Summer | 2011 | —
row 11 : POR | Geraldo | Paços de Ferreira | Transfer | Summer | 2010 | €300K
row 12 : ARG | Azcárate | AtléticoMadrid | Transfer | Summer | 2011 | Free
row 13 : GRE | Pappas | Olympiacos | Transfer | Summer | 2010 | Free
row 14 : GRE ROM | Barboudis | Ilisiakos | Transfer | Summer | 2010 | €60K
row 15 : BRA | Moretto | Benfica | Loan | Summer | 2008 | Free
row 16 : SEN | Diouf | Xam-Xam | Transfer | Summer | 2011 | Free
row 17 : ARG | Blanco | Colón | Loan | Summer | 2008 | €450K
row 18 : POR | Manú | Benfica | Loan | Summer | 2008 | Free
row 19 : AUT | Macho | 1. FC Kaiserslautern | Transfer | Summer | 2009 | €300K
row 20 : GRE | Tachtsidis | Youth system | Promotion | Summer | 2010 | —
row 21 : GRE | Gentsoglou | Panachaiki | Loan return | Winter | 2013 | —
row 22 : SLE | Kallon | Monaco | Transfer | Winter | 2008 | Free
row 23 : POR | Edinho | VitóriadeSetúbal | Loan | Winter | 2008 | €150K [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What was the transfer fee for the player ending in 2011 and moving from Thrasyvoulos?

Answer: —
[Table] header: Nat. | Name | Moving from | Type | Transfer window | Ends | Transfer fee row 1 : ARG | Arruabarrena | Villarreal | Transfer | Summer | 2010 | Free
row 2 : GRE | Pavlis | Youth system | Promotion | Summer | 2010 | —
row 3 : BRA | Manduca | Youth system | Transfer | Summer | 2010 | €750K
row 4 : BRA | Edson Ratinho | Mogi Mirim | Transfer | Summer | 2012 | €250K
row 5 : CAN MWI | Nsaliwa | Panionios | Transfer | Summer | 2010 | €450K
row 6 : BRA | Rivaldo | Olympiacos | Transfer | Summer | 2009 | Free
row 7 : GRE | Bourbos | Kerkyra | Loan Return | Summer | 2010 | —
row 8 : GRE | Zorbas | Niki Volos | Loan Return | Summer | 2011 | —
row 9 : CYP | Tofas | Ethnikos Piraeus | Loan Return | Summer | 2010 | —
row 10 : GRE | Koutromanos | Thrasyvoulos | Loan Return | Summer | 2011 | —
row 11 : POR | Geraldo | Paços de Ferreira | Transfer | Summer | 2010 | €300K
row 12 : ARG | Azcárate | AtléticoMadrid | Transfer | Summer | 2011 | Free
row 13 : GRE | Pappas | Olympiacos | Transfer | Summer | 2010 | Free
row 14 : GRE ROM | Barboudis | Ilisiakos | Transfer | Summer | 2010 | €60K
row 15 : BRA | Moretto | Benfica | Loan | Summer | 2008 | Free
row 16 : SEN | Diouf | Xam-Xam | Transfer | Summer | 2011 | Free
row 17 : ARG | Blanco | Colón | Loan | Summer | 2008 | €450K
row 18 : POR | Manú | Benfica | Loan | Summer | 2008 | Free
row 19 : AUT | Macho | 1. FC Kaiserslautern | Transfer | Summer | 2009 | €300K
row 20 : GRE | Tachtsidis | Youth system | Promotion | Summer | 2010 | —
row 21 : GRE | Gentsoglou | Panachaiki | Loan return | Winter | 2013 | —
row 22 : SLE | Kallon | Monaco | Transfer | Winter | 2008 | Free
row 23 : POR | Edinho | VitóriadeSetúbal | Loan | Winter | 2008 | €150K [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What was the transfer fee for the player moving in the winter window and ending in a year after 2010?

Answer: —
[Table] header: Week | Date | Opponent | Result | Attendance row 1 : 1 | September 8, 1985 | at Buffalo Bills | W 14–9 | 67,597
row 2 : 2 | September 15, 1985 | Seattle Seahawks | L 49–35 | 54,420
row 3 : 3 | September 22, 1985 | at Cincinnati Bengals | W 44–41 | 52,270
row 4 : 4 | September 29, 1985 | Cleveland Browns | L 21–7 | 52,107
row 5 : 5 | October 6, 1985 | at Seattle Seahawks | L 26–21 | 61,300
row 6 : 6 | October 13, 1985 | Kansas City Chiefs | W 31–20 | 50,067
row 7 : 7 | October 20, 1985 | at Minnesota Vikings | L 21–17 | 61,670
row 8 : 8 | October 28, 1985 | at Los Angeles Raiders | L 34–21 | 69,297
row 9 : 9 | November 3, 1985 | Denver Broncos | W 30–10 | 57,312
row 10 : 10 | November 10, 1985 | Los Angeles Raiders | W 40–34 | 58,566
row 11 : 11 | November 17, 1985 | at Denver Broncos | L 30–24 | 74,376
row 12 : 12 | November 24, 1985 | at Houston Oilers | L 37–35 | 34,336
row 13 : 13 | December 1, 1985 | Buffalo Bills | W 40–7 | 45,487
row 14 : 14 | December 8, 1985 | Pittsburgh Steelers | W 54–44 | 52,098
row 15 : 15 | December 15, 1985 | Philadelphia Eagles | W 20–14 | 45,569
row 16 : 16 | December 22, 1985 | at Kansas City Chiefs | L 38–34 | 18,178 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: Can you tell me the lowest Week that has the Attendance smaller than 34,336?

Answer: 16.0
[Table] header: Date | Tournament | Winning score | To par | Margin of victory | Runner(s)-up row 1 : 2 Nov 2002 | Southern Farm Bureau Classic * | 66-67-68=201 | −15 | 1 stroke | Deane Pappas
row 2 : 12 Mar 2006 | Honda Classic | 72-67-68-69=276 | −12 | 2 strokes | Geoff Ogilvy
row 3 : 27 Feb 2011 | WGC-Accenture Match Play Championship | 3 and 2 | 3 and 2 | 3 and 2 | Martin Kaymer
row 4 : 23 Oct 2011 | Children's Miracle Network Hospitals Classic | 66-71-70-64=27 | −17 | 2 strokes | Justin Leonard
row 5 : 18 Mar 2012 | Transitions Championship | 67-68-70-66=27 | −13 | Playoff | Bae Sang-moon , [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: Which date's margin of victory was 3 and 2?

Answer: 27 Feb 2011
[Table] header: Date | Tournament | Winning score | To par | Margin of victory | Runner(s)-up row 1 : 2 Nov 2002 | Southern Farm Bureau Classic * | 66-67-68=201 | −15 | 1 stroke | Deane Pappas
row 2 : 12 Mar 2006 | Honda Classic | 72-67-68-69=276 | −12 | 2 strokes | Geoff Ogilvy
row 3 : 27 Feb 2011 | WGC-Accenture Match Play Championship | 3 and 2 | 3 and 2 | 3 and 2 | Martin Kaymer
row 4 : 23 Oct 2011 | Children's Miracle Network Hospitals Classic | 66-71-70-64=27 | −17 | 2 strokes | Justin Leonard
row 5 : 18 Mar 2012 | Transitions Championship | 67-68-70-66=27 | −13 | Playoff | Bae Sang-moon , [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What is the to par when the winning score was 67-68-70-66=271?

Answer: none
[Table] header: Date | Tournament | Winning score | To par | Margin of victory | Runner(s)-up row 1 : 2 Nov 2002 | Southern Farm Bureau Classic * | 66-67-68=201 | −15 | 1 stroke | Deane Pappas
row 2 : 12 Mar 2006 | Honda Classic | 72-67-68-69=276 | −12 | 2 strokes | Geoff Ogilvy
row 3 : 27 Feb 2011 | WGC-Accenture Match Play Championship | 3 and 2 | 3 and 2 | 3 and 2 | Martin Kaymer
row 4 : 23 Oct 2011 | Children's Miracle Network Hospitals Classic | 66-71-70-64=27 | −17 | 2 strokes | Justin Leonard
row 5 : 18 Mar 2012 | Transitions Championship | 67-68-70-66=27 | −13 | Playoff | Bae Sang-moon , [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What is the to par when the tournament involved was the Transitions Championship?

Answer: −13
[Table] header: Date | Tournament | Winning score | To par | Margin of victory | Runner(s)-up row 1 : 2 Nov 2002 | Southern Farm Bureau Classic * | 66-67-68=201 | −15 | 1 stroke | Deane Pappas
row 2 : 12 Mar 2006 | Honda Classic | 72-67-68-69=276 | −12 | 2 strokes | Geoff Ogilvy
row 3 : 27 Feb 2011 | WGC-Accenture Match Play Championship | 3 and 2 | 3 and 2 | 3 and 2 | Martin Kaymer
row 4 : 23 Oct 2011 | Children's Miracle Network Hospitals Classic | 66-71-70-64=27 | −17 | 2 strokes | Justin Leonard
row 5 : 18 Mar 2012 | Transitions Championship | 67-68-70-66=27 | −13 | Playoff | Bae Sang-moon , [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: On what date was the Transitions Championship?

Answer: 18 Mar 2012
[Table] header: Date | Tournament | Winning score | Margin of victory | Runner(s)-up row 1 : May 21, 1967 | Colonial National Invitation | –2 (65-66-74- | 2 strokes | Charles Coody
row 2 : Jun 30, 1968 | Cleveland Open Invitational | –8 (69-68-67- | 2 strokes | Bob Dickson
row 3 : Jul 14, 1968 | Greater Milwaukee Open | –13 (68-67-71- | 4 strokes | Sam Snead
row 4 : Aug 16, 1970 | PGA Championship | –1 (70-70-66- | 2 strokes | Bob Murphy , Arnold Palmer
row 5 : Aug 15, 1971 | Massachusetts Classic | –13 (71-69-69- | 1 stroke | Raymond Floyd
row 6 : Jul 8, 1973 | Greater Milwaukee Open | –12 (69-63-71- | 1 stroke | Homero Blancas , Hubert
row 7 : Feb 17, 1974 | Glen Campbell-Los Angeles Open | –8 (68-68-71- | 2 strokes | John Mahaffey , Sam Sne
row 8 : Jul 14, 1974 | Quad Cities Open | –13 (68-68-71- | 1 stroke | Bruce Fleisher
row 9 : Aug 18, 1974 | Sammy Davis Jr.-Greater Hartford Open | –12 (65-65-69- | 4 strokes | Raymond Floyd
row 10 : Aug 15, 1976 | PGA Championship | +1 (70-72-69-70 | 1 stroke | Raymond Floyd , Don January [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: Who was the runner-up on Jul 14, 1968?

Answer: Sam Snead
[Table] header: Date | Tournament | Winning score | Margin of victory | Runner(s)-up row 1 : May 21, 1967 | Colonial National Invitation | –2 (65-66-74- | 2 strokes | Charles Coody
row 2 : Jun 30, 1968 | Cleveland Open Invitational | –8 (69-68-67- | 2 strokes | Bob Dickson
row 3 : Jul 14, 1968 | Greater Milwaukee Open | –13 (68-67-71- | 4 strokes | Sam Snead
row 4 : Aug 16, 1970 | PGA Championship | –1 (70-70-66- | 2 strokes | Bob Murphy , Arnold Palmer
row 5 : Aug 15, 1971 | Massachusetts Classic | –13 (71-69-69- | 1 stroke | Raymond Floyd
row 6 : Jul 8, 1973 | Greater Milwaukee Open | –12 (69-63-71- | 1 stroke | Homero Blancas , Hubert
row 7 : Feb 17, 1974 | Glen Campbell-Los Angeles Open | –8 (68-68-71- | 2 strokes | John Mahaffey , Sam Sne
row 8 : Jul 14, 1974 | Quad Cities Open | –13 (68-68-71- | 1 stroke | Bruce Fleisher
row 9 : Aug 18, 1974 | Sammy Davis Jr.-Greater Hartford Open | –12 (65-65-69- | 4 strokes | Raymond Floyd
row 10 : Aug 15, 1976 | PGA Championship | +1 (70-72-69-70 | 1 stroke | Raymond Floyd , Don January [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What is the winning score of the tournament with Charles Coody as the runner-up?

Answer: –2 (65-66-74-
[Table] header: Tournament | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 row 1 : Tournament | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013
row 2 : Grand Slam Tournaments | Grand Slam Tournaments | Grand Slam Tournaments | Grand Slam Tournaments | Grand Slam Tournaments | Grand Slam Tournaments | Grand Slam Tournaments | Grand Slam Tournaments | Grand Slam Tournaments
row 3 : Australian Open | A | A | LQ | LQ | LQ | 3R | LQ | 2R
row 4 : French Open | A | A | LQ | LQ | LQ | 2R | LQ | 1R
row 5 : Wimbledon | A | A | LQ | 1R | LQ | 1R | 1R | 3R
row 6 : US Open | A | A | LQ | 1R | LQ | 1R | LQ | 1R [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What is the 2011 value of the French Open, which has a 2006 value of A?

Answer: 2R
[Table] header: Tournament | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 row 1 : Tournament | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013
row 2 : Grand Slam Tournaments | Grand Slam Tournaments | Grand Slam Tournaments | Grand Slam Tournaments | Grand Slam Tournaments | Grand Slam Tournaments | Grand Slam Tournaments | Grand Slam Tournaments | Grand Slam Tournaments
row 3 : Australian Open | A | A | LQ | LQ | LQ | 3R | LQ | 2R
row 4 : French Open | A | A | LQ | LQ | LQ | 2R | LQ | 1R
row 5 : Wimbledon | A | A | LQ | 1R | LQ | 1R | 1R | 3R
row 6 : US Open | A | A | LQ | 1R | LQ | 1R | LQ | 1R [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What is the tournament with a 2006 value of A and a 2011 value of 1r?

Answer: Wimbledon, US Open
[Table] header: Tournament | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 row 1 : Tournament | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013
row 2 : Grand Slam Tournaments | Grand Slam Tournaments | Grand Slam Tournaments | Grand Slam Tournaments | Grand Slam Tournaments | Grand Slam Tournaments | Grand Slam Tournaments | Grand Slam Tournaments | Grand Slam Tournaments
row 3 : Australian Open | A | A | LQ | LQ | LQ | 3R | LQ | 2R
row 4 : French Open | A | A | LQ | LQ | LQ | 2R | LQ | 1R
row 5 : Wimbledon | A | A | LQ | 1R | LQ | 1R | 1R | 3R
row 6 : US Open | A | A | LQ | 1R | LQ | 1R | LQ | 1R [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What is the 2007 value of the US Open?

Answer: A
[Table] header: Tournament | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 row 1 : Tournament | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013
row 2 : Grand Slam Tournaments | Grand Slam Tournaments | Grand Slam Tournaments | Grand Slam Tournaments | Grand Slam Tournaments | Grand Slam Tournaments | Grand Slam Tournaments | Grand Slam Tournaments | Grand Slam Tournaments
row 3 : Australian Open | A | A | LQ | LQ | LQ | 3R | LQ | 2R
row 4 : French Open | A | A | LQ | LQ | LQ | 2R | LQ | 1R
row 5 : Wimbledon | A | A | LQ | 1R | LQ | 1R | 1R | 3R
row 6 : US Open | A | A | LQ | 1R | LQ | 1R | LQ | 1R [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What is the tournament with a 2006 value of A and a 2011 value of 3r?

Answer: Australian Open
[Table] header: Region | Date | Label | Format | Catalog row 1 : Spain | 2003 | Electropolis | vinyl , 12" | VLMX 1341-3
row 2 : Germany | 2003 | Zomba Records | vinyl , 12" | RTD 103.4126.0
row 3 : United Kingdom | 2002 | Nebula Classics | vinyl , 12" | NEBBC002
row 4 : United Kingdom | 2004 | Nebula Classics | vinyl , 12" | NEBBC003
row 5 : Netherlands | 2002 | Magik Muzik | 2 x Vinyl, 12" | Magik Muzik 805-5 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What Catalog was released in Germany?

Answer: RTD 103.4126.0
[Table] header: Region | Date | Label | Format | Catalog row 1 : Spain | 2003 | Electropolis | vinyl , 12" | VLMX 1341-3
row 2 : Germany | 2003 | Zomba Records | vinyl , 12" | RTD 103.4126.0
row 3 : United Kingdom | 2002 | Nebula Classics | vinyl , 12" | NEBBC002
row 4 : United Kingdom | 2004 | Nebula Classics | vinyl , 12" | NEBBC003
row 5 : Netherlands | 2002 | Magik Muzik | 2 x Vinyl, 12" | Magik Muzik 805-5 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What Region was the Catalog magik muzik 805-5 released in?

Answer: Netherlands
[Table] header: Region | Date | Label | Format | Catalog row 1 : Spain | 2003 | Electropolis | vinyl , 12" | VLMX 1341-3
row 2 : Germany | 2003 | Zomba Records | vinyl , 12" | RTD 103.4126.0
row 3 : United Kingdom | 2002 | Nebula Classics | vinyl , 12" | NEBBC002
row 4 : United Kingdom | 2004 | Nebula Classics | vinyl , 12" | NEBBC003
row 5 : Netherlands | 2002 | Magik Muzik | 2 x Vinyl, 12" | Magik Muzik 805-5 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What is the total number of Dates during which the Catalog nebbc003 was given?

Answer: 2004.0
[Table] header: Province | Capital | Area (km²) | Population census 1999 | Population per km² (2009) | Population census 2009 row 1 : Central Province | Tulagi | 615 | 21,577 | 42.4 | 26,051
row 2 : Choiseul Province | Taro Island | 3,837 | 20,008 | 6.9 | 26,371
row 3 : Guadalcanal Province | Honiara | 5,336 | 60,275 | 17.5 | 93,613
row 4 : Isabel Province | Buala | 4,136 | 20,421 | 6.3 | 26,158
row 5 : Makira-Ulawa Province | Kirakira | 3,188 | 31,006 | 12.7 | 40,419
row 6 : Malaita Province | Auki | 4,225 | 122,620 | 32.6 | 137,596
row 7 : Rennell and Bellona Province | Tigoa | 671 | 2,377 | 4.5 | 3,041
row 8 : Temotu Province | Lata | 895 | 18,912 | 23.9 | 21,362
row 9 : Western Province | Gizo | 5,475 | 62,739 | 14.0 | 76,649
row 10 : Capital Territory | Honiara | 22 | 49,107 | 2,936.8 | 64,609
row 11 : Solomon Islands | Honiara | 28,400 | 409,042 | 14.7 | 515,870 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What is the highest Population per km² (2009) that is in western province, with an Area (km²) larger than 5,475?

Answer: none
[Table] header: Province | Capital | Area (km²) | Population census 1999 | Population per km² (2009) | Population census 2009 row 1 : Central Province | Tulagi | 615 | 21,577 | 42.4 | 26,051
row 2 : Choiseul Province | Taro Island | 3,837 | 20,008 | 6.9 | 26,371
row 3 : Guadalcanal Province | Honiara | 5,336 | 60,275 | 17.5 | 93,613
row 4 : Isabel Province | Buala | 4,136 | 20,421 | 6.3 | 26,158
row 5 : Makira-Ulawa Province | Kirakira | 3,188 | 31,006 | 12.7 | 40,419
row 6 : Malaita Province | Auki | 4,225 | 122,620 | 32.6 | 137,596
row 7 : Rennell and Bellona Province | Tigoa | 671 | 2,377 | 4.5 | 3,041
row 8 : Temotu Province | Lata | 895 | 18,912 | 23.9 | 21,362
row 9 : Western Province | Gizo | 5,475 | 62,739 | 14.0 | 76,649
row 10 : Capital Territory | Honiara | 22 | 49,107 | 2,936.8 | 64,609
row 11 : Solomon Islands | Honiara | 28,400 | 409,042 | 14.7 | 515,870 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What is the lowest Population per km² (2009) that has a Solomon Islands province, with an Area (km²) smaller than 28,400?

Answer: none
[Table] header: Province | Capital | Area (km²) | Population census 1999 | Population per km² (2009) | Population census 2009 row 1 : Central Province | Tulagi | 615 | 21,577 | 42.4 | 26,051
row 2 : Choiseul Province | Taro Island | 3,837 | 20,008 | 6.9 | 26,371
row 3 : Guadalcanal Province | Honiara | 5,336 | 60,275 | 17.5 | 93,613
row 4 : Isabel Province | Buala | 4,136 | 20,421 | 6.3 | 26,158
row 5 : Makira-Ulawa Province | Kirakira | 3,188 | 31,006 | 12.7 | 40,419
row 6 : Malaita Province | Auki | 4,225 | 122,620 | 32.6 | 137,596
row 7 : Rennell and Bellona Province | Tigoa | 671 | 2,377 | 4.5 | 3,041
row 8 : Temotu Province | Lata | 895 | 18,912 | 23.9 | 21,362
row 9 : Western Province | Gizo | 5,475 | 62,739 | 14.0 | 76,649
row 10 : Capital Territory | Honiara | 22 | 49,107 | 2,936.8 | 64,609
row 11 : Solomon Islands | Honiara | 28,400 | 409,042 | 14.7 | 515,870 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What is the lowest population census from 1999 with an Area (km²) of 4,225, and a Population per km² (2009) fewer than 32.6?

Answer: none
[Table] header: Year | Manufacturer | Start | Finish | Team row 1 : 2002 | Ford | 23 | 7 | Penske
row 2 : 2003 | Dodge | 37 | 43 | Penske
row 3 : 2004 | Dodge | 20 | 31 | Penske
row 4 : 2005 | Dodge | 9 | 20 | Penske
row 5 : 2006 | Dodge | 18 | 3 | Penske
row 6 : 2007 | Dodge | 16 | 38 | Penske
row 7 : 2008 | Dodge | 7 | 1 | Penske
row 8 : 2009 | Chevrolet | 36 | 36 | Stewart-Haas
row 9 : 2010 | Chevrolet | 17 | 34 | Stewart-Haas
row 10 : 2011 | Chevrolet | 21 | 22 | Stewart-Haas
row 11 : 2012 | Chevrolet | 18 | 21 | Stewart-Haas
row 12 : 2013 | Chevrolet | 34 | 5 | Stewart-Haas [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What Team was in 2005?

Answer: Penske
[Table] header: Year | Manufacturer | Start | Finish | Team row 1 : 2002 | Ford | 23 | 7 | Penske
row 2 : 2003 | Dodge | 37 | 43 | Penske
row 3 : 2004 | Dodge | 20 | 31 | Penske
row 4 : 2005 | Dodge | 9 | 20 | Penske
row 5 : 2006 | Dodge | 18 | 3 | Penske
row 6 : 2007 | Dodge | 16 | 38 | Penske
row 7 : 2008 | Dodge | 7 | 1 | Penske
row 8 : 2009 | Chevrolet | 36 | 36 | Stewart-Haas
row 9 : 2010 | Chevrolet | 17 | 34 | Stewart-Haas
row 10 : 2011 | Chevrolet | 21 | 22 | Stewart-Haas
row 11 : 2012 | Chevrolet | 18 | 21 | Stewart-Haas
row 12 : 2013 | Chevrolet | 34 | 5 | Stewart-Haas [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: Before 2008, if the Manufacturer is dodge and the start is under 9, what's the highest finish time?

Answer: none
[Table] header: Year | Manufacturer | Start | Finish | Team row 1 : 2002 | Ford | 23 | 7 | Penske
row 2 : 2003 | Dodge | 37 | 43 | Penske
row 3 : 2004 | Dodge | 20 | 31 | Penske
row 4 : 2005 | Dodge | 9 | 20 | Penske
row 5 : 2006 | Dodge | 18 | 3 | Penske
row 6 : 2007 | Dodge | 16 | 38 | Penske
row 7 : 2008 | Dodge | 7 | 1 | Penske
row 8 : 2009 | Chevrolet | 36 | 36 | Stewart-Haas
row 9 : 2010 | Chevrolet | 17 | 34 | Stewart-Haas
row 10 : 2011 | Chevrolet | 21 | 22 | Stewart-Haas
row 11 : 2012 | Chevrolet | 18 | 21 | Stewart-Haas
row 12 : 2013 | Chevrolet | 34 | 5 | Stewart-Haas [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: When the team is penske and they start under 9, what's the average finish time?

Answer: 1.0
[Table] header: Rank | Nation | Gold | Silver | Bronze | Total row 1 : 1 | Soviet Union | 12 | 0 | 4 | 16
row 2 : 2 | West Germany | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2
row 3 : 3 | Bulgaria | 1 | 5 | 1 | 7
row 4 : 4 | Yugoslavia | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4
row 5 : 5 | Japan | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4
row 6 : 5 | United States | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4
row 7 : 7 | East Germany | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3
row 8 : 7 | Hungary | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3
row 9 : 9 | Finland | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4
row 10 : 9 | Poland | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4
row 11 : 11 | Czechoslovakia | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1
row 12 : 11 | Iran | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1
row 13 : 11 | South Korea | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1
row 14 : 11 | Sweden | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1
row 15 : 11 | Turkey | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1
row 16 : 16 | Romania | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2
row 17 : 17 | Austria | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1
row 18 : 17 | Mongolia | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1
row 19 : Total | Total | 20 | 20 | 20 | 60 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What is the sum of Gold, when Total is greater than 2, when Bronze is greater than 1, and when Silver is less than 1?

Answer: 12.0
[Table] header: Rank | Nation | Gold | Silver | Bronze | Total row 1 : 1 | Soviet Union | 12 | 0 | 4 | 16
row 2 : 2 | West Germany | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2
row 3 : 3 | Bulgaria | 1 | 5 | 1 | 7
row 4 : 4 | Yugoslavia | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4
row 5 : 5 | Japan | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4
row 6 : 5 | United States | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4
row 7 : 7 | East Germany | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3
row 8 : 7 | Hungary | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3
row 9 : 9 | Finland | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4
row 10 : 9 | Poland | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4
row 11 : 11 | Czechoslovakia | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1
row 12 : 11 | Iran | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1
row 13 : 11 | South Korea | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1
row 14 : 11 | Sweden | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1
row 15 : 11 | Turkey | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1
row 16 : 16 | Romania | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2
row 17 : 17 | Austria | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1
row 18 : 17 | Mongolia | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1
row 19 : Total | Total | 20 | 20 | 20 | 60 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What is the sum of Gold, when Total is less than 1?

Answer: none
[Table] header: Rank | Nation | Gold | Silver | Bronze | Total row 1 : 1 | Soviet Union | 12 | 0 | 4 | 16
row 2 : 2 | West Germany | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2
row 3 : 3 | Bulgaria | 1 | 5 | 1 | 7
row 4 : 4 | Yugoslavia | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4
row 5 : 5 | Japan | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4
row 6 : 5 | United States | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4
row 7 : 7 | East Germany | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3
row 8 : 7 | Hungary | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3
row 9 : 9 | Finland | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4
row 10 : 9 | Poland | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4
row 11 : 11 | Czechoslovakia | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1
row 12 : 11 | Iran | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1
row 13 : 11 | South Korea | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1
row 14 : 11 | Sweden | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1
row 15 : 11 | Turkey | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1
row 16 : 16 | Romania | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2
row 17 : 17 | Austria | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1
row 18 : 17 | Mongolia | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1
row 19 : Total | Total | 20 | 20 | 20 | 60 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What is the average Total, when Gold is 0, and when Nation is Iran?

Answer: 1.0
[Table] header: Rank | Nation | Gold | Silver | Bronze | Total row 1 : 1 | Soviet Union | 12 | 0 | 4 | 16
row 2 : 2 | West Germany | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2
row 3 : 3 | Bulgaria | 1 | 5 | 1 | 7
row 4 : 4 | Yugoslavia | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4
row 5 : 5 | Japan | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4
row 6 : 5 | United States | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4
row 7 : 7 | East Germany | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3
row 8 : 7 | Hungary | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3
row 9 : 9 | Finland | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4
row 10 : 9 | Poland | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4
row 11 : 11 | Czechoslovakia | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1
row 12 : 11 | Iran | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1
row 13 : 11 | South Korea | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1
row 14 : 11 | Sweden | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1
row 15 : 11 | Turkey | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1
row 16 : 16 | Romania | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2
row 17 : 17 | Austria | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1
row 18 : 17 | Mongolia | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1
row 19 : Total | Total | 20 | 20 | 20 | 60 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What is the sum of Total, when Nation is West Germany, and when Gold is greater than 2?

Answer: none
[Table] header: Rank | Nation | Gold | Silver | Bronze | Total row 1 : 1 | Soviet Union | 12 | 0 | 4 | 16
row 2 : 2 | West Germany | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2
row 3 : 3 | Bulgaria | 1 | 5 | 1 | 7
row 4 : 4 | Yugoslavia | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4
row 5 : 5 | Japan | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4
row 6 : 5 | United States | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4
row 7 : 7 | East Germany | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3
row 8 : 7 | Hungary | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3
row 9 : 9 | Finland | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4
row 10 : 9 | Poland | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4
row 11 : 11 | Czechoslovakia | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1
row 12 : 11 | Iran | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1
row 13 : 11 | South Korea | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1
row 14 : 11 | Sweden | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1
row 15 : 11 | Turkey | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1
row 16 : 16 | Romania | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2
row 17 : 17 | Austria | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1
row 18 : 17 | Mongolia | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1
row 19 : Total | Total | 20 | 20 | 20 | 60 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What is the average Total, when Gold is less than 0?

Answer: none
[Table] header: Episode Number | Air Date | Guest Host | Who knows the most about the guest host? panelists | Coat Of Cash Wearing Celebrity row 1 : 1 | 5 January 2007 | David Tennant | Amy Winehouse and George Galloway | Lauren Harries
row 2 : 2 | 12 January 2007 | Tamzin Outhwaite | Kate Thornton and Tito Jackson | Bradley McIntosh
row 3 : 3 | 19 January 2007 | James Nesbitt | Leo Sayer and Kirstie Alls | Shahbaz Chauhdry
row 4 : 4 | 26 January 2007 | Noel Edmonds | Kelly Osbourne and Jason Donovan | Jason Donovan
row 5 : 5 | 2 February 2007 | Jamie Oliver | Jermaine Jackson and Nora Sands | Ian "H" Watkins
row 6 : 6 | 9 February 2007 | Steven Seagal | Gemma Atkinson and Jamelia | Steven Seagal
row 7 : 7 | 16 February 2007 | Ashley Jensen | Duncan James and Kim Woodburn | Alan Carr [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What date did the show air that had Duncan James and Kim Woodburn as panelists?

Answer: 16 February 2007
[Table] header: Province of Silla | Administrative district | Pre-1009 province | Post-1009 province | Modern equivalent row 1 : Hanju | Gyeonggi ( 京畿 ) | Gyeonggi | Gyeonggi | Kaesŏng
row 2 : Hanju | Yangju -mok( 揚州牧  | Gwannae -do | Seohae -do | Hwanghae
row 3 : Hanju | Hwangju -mok( 黃州牧 | Gwannae -do | Seohae -do | North Hwanghae
row 4 : Hanju | Haeju -mok( 海州牧 | Gwannae -do | Seohae -do | South Hwanghae
row 5 : Hanju | Gwangju -mok( 廣州牧 | Gwannae -do | Yanggwang -do | Gyeonggi
row 6 : Hanju | Chungju -mok( 忠州牧 | Jungwon -do | Yanggwang -do | North Chungcheong
row 7 : Ungju | Cheongju -mok | Jungwon -do | Yanggwang -do | North Chungcheong
row 8 : Ungju | Gongju -mok | Hanam -do | Yanggwang -do | South Chungcheong
row 9 : Jeonju | Jeonju -mok( 全州牧 | Gangnam -do | Jeolla -do | North Jeolla
row 10 : Muju | Naju -mok | Haeyang -do | Jeolla -do | South Jeolla
row 11 : Muju | Seungju | Haeyang -do | Jeolla -do | South Jeolla
row 12 : Sangju | Sangju -mok | Yeongnam -do | Gyeongsang -do | North Gyeongsang
row 13 : Gangju | Jinju -mok | Sannam -do | Gyeongsang -do | Western South Gyeongsang
row 14 : Yangju | Jinju -mok | Yeongdong -do | Gyeongsang -do | Eastern South Gyeongsang
row 15 : Sakju | — | Sakbang -do | Gyoju -do | Gangwon
row 16 : Myeongju | — | Sakbang -do | Donggye | Gangwon
row 17 : — | — | Paeseo -do | Bukgye | Pyeongan [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: Which Administrative district has a Pre-1009 province of gwannae -do and a Post-1009 province of seohae -do?

Answer: Yangju -mok( 揚州牧 , Hwangju -mok( 黃州牧, Haeju -mok( 海州牧
[Table] header: Province of Silla | Administrative district | Pre-1009 province | Post-1009 province | Modern equivalent row 1 : Hanju | Gyeonggi ( 京畿 ) | Gyeonggi | Gyeonggi | Kaesŏng
row 2 : Hanju | Yangju -mok( 揚州牧  | Gwannae -do | Seohae -do | Hwanghae
row 3 : Hanju | Hwangju -mok( 黃州牧 | Gwannae -do | Seohae -do | North Hwanghae
row 4 : Hanju | Haeju -mok( 海州牧 | Gwannae -do | Seohae -do | South Hwanghae
row 5 : Hanju | Gwangju -mok( 廣州牧 | Gwannae -do | Yanggwang -do | Gyeonggi
row 6 : Hanju | Chungju -mok( 忠州牧 | Jungwon -do | Yanggwang -do | North Chungcheong
row 7 : Ungju | Cheongju -mok | Jungwon -do | Yanggwang -do | North Chungcheong
row 8 : Ungju | Gongju -mok | Hanam -do | Yanggwang -do | South Chungcheong
row 9 : Jeonju | Jeonju -mok( 全州牧 | Gangnam -do | Jeolla -do | North Jeolla
row 10 : Muju | Naju -mok | Haeyang -do | Jeolla -do | South Jeolla
row 11 : Muju | Seungju | Haeyang -do | Jeolla -do | South Jeolla
row 12 : Sangju | Sangju -mok | Yeongnam -do | Gyeongsang -do | North Gyeongsang
row 13 : Gangju | Jinju -mok | Sannam -do | Gyeongsang -do | Western South Gyeongsang
row 14 : Yangju | Jinju -mok | Yeongdong -do | Gyeongsang -do | Eastern South Gyeongsang
row 15 : Sakju | — | Sakbang -do | Gyoju -do | Gangwon
row 16 : Myeongju | — | Sakbang -do | Donggye | Gangwon
row 17 : — | — | Paeseo -do | Bukgye | Pyeongan [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What kind of Modern equivalent that has a Pre-1009 province of sakbang -do, and a Province of Silla of sakju?

Answer: Gangwon
[Table] header: Province of Silla | Administrative district | Pre-1009 province | Post-1009 province | Modern equivalent row 1 : Hanju | Gyeonggi ( 京畿 ) | Gyeonggi | Gyeonggi | Kaesŏng
row 2 : Hanju | Yangju -mok( 揚州牧  | Gwannae -do | Seohae -do | Hwanghae
row 3 : Hanju | Hwangju -mok( 黃州牧 | Gwannae -do | Seohae -do | North Hwanghae
row 4 : Hanju | Haeju -mok( 海州牧 | Gwannae -do | Seohae -do | South Hwanghae
row 5 : Hanju | Gwangju -mok( 廣州牧 | Gwannae -do | Yanggwang -do | Gyeonggi
row 6 : Hanju | Chungju -mok( 忠州牧 | Jungwon -do | Yanggwang -do | North Chungcheong
row 7 : Ungju | Cheongju -mok | Jungwon -do | Yanggwang -do | North Chungcheong
row 8 : Ungju | Gongju -mok | Hanam -do | Yanggwang -do | South Chungcheong
row 9 : Jeonju | Jeonju -mok( 全州牧 | Gangnam -do | Jeolla -do | North Jeolla
row 10 : Muju | Naju -mok | Haeyang -do | Jeolla -do | South Jeolla
row 11 : Muju | Seungju | Haeyang -do | Jeolla -do | South Jeolla
row 12 : Sangju | Sangju -mok | Yeongnam -do | Gyeongsang -do | North Gyeongsang
row 13 : Gangju | Jinju -mok | Sannam -do | Gyeongsang -do | Western South Gyeongsang
row 14 : Yangju | Jinju -mok | Yeongdong -do | Gyeongsang -do | Eastern South Gyeongsang
row 15 : Sakju | — | Sakbang -do | Gyoju -do | Gangwon
row 16 : Myeongju | — | Sakbang -do | Donggye | Gangwon
row 17 : — | — | Paeseo -do | Bukgye | Pyeongan [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What kind of Modern equivalent has a Post-1009 province of gyeongsang -do, and a Administrative district of jinju -mok, and a Province of Silla of gangju?

Answer: Western South Gyeongsang
[Table] header: Province of Silla | Administrative district | Pre-1009 province | Post-1009 province | Modern equivalent row 1 : Hanju | Gyeonggi ( 京畿 ) | Gyeonggi | Gyeonggi | Kaesŏng
row 2 : Hanju | Yangju -mok( 揚州牧  | Gwannae -do | Seohae -do | Hwanghae
row 3 : Hanju | Hwangju -mok( 黃州牧 | Gwannae -do | Seohae -do | North Hwanghae
row 4 : Hanju | Haeju -mok( 海州牧 | Gwannae -do | Seohae -do | South Hwanghae
row 5 : Hanju | Gwangju -mok( 廣州牧 | Gwannae -do | Yanggwang -do | Gyeonggi
row 6 : Hanju | Chungju -mok( 忠州牧 | Jungwon -do | Yanggwang -do | North Chungcheong
row 7 : Ungju | Cheongju -mok | Jungwon -do | Yanggwang -do | North Chungcheong
row 8 : Ungju | Gongju -mok | Hanam -do | Yanggwang -do | South Chungcheong
row 9 : Jeonju | Jeonju -mok( 全州牧 | Gangnam -do | Jeolla -do | North Jeolla
row 10 : Muju | Naju -mok | Haeyang -do | Jeolla -do | South Jeolla
row 11 : Muju | Seungju | Haeyang -do | Jeolla -do | South Jeolla
row 12 : Sangju | Sangju -mok | Yeongnam -do | Gyeongsang -do | North Gyeongsang
row 13 : Gangju | Jinju -mok | Sannam -do | Gyeongsang -do | Western South Gyeongsang
row 14 : Yangju | Jinju -mok | Yeongdong -do | Gyeongsang -do | Eastern South Gyeongsang
row 15 : Sakju | — | Sakbang -do | Gyoju -do | Gangwon
row 16 : Myeongju | — | Sakbang -do | Donggye | Gangwon
row 17 : — | — | Paeseo -do | Bukgye | Pyeongan [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: WHat kind of Province of Silla has a Modern equivalent of pyeongan?

Answer: —
[Table] header: Province of Silla | Administrative district | Pre-1009 province | Post-1009 province | Modern equivalent row 1 : Hanju | Gyeonggi ( 京畿 ) | Gyeonggi | Gyeonggi | Kaesŏng
row 2 : Hanju | Yangju -mok( 揚州牧  | Gwannae -do | Seohae -do | Hwanghae
row 3 : Hanju | Hwangju -mok( 黃州牧 | Gwannae -do | Seohae -do | North Hwanghae
row 4 : Hanju | Haeju -mok( 海州牧 | Gwannae -do | Seohae -do | South Hwanghae
row 5 : Hanju | Gwangju -mok( 廣州牧 | Gwannae -do | Yanggwang -do | Gyeonggi
row 6 : Hanju | Chungju -mok( 忠州牧 | Jungwon -do | Yanggwang -do | North Chungcheong
row 7 : Ungju | Cheongju -mok | Jungwon -do | Yanggwang -do | North Chungcheong
row 8 : Ungju | Gongju -mok | Hanam -do | Yanggwang -do | South Chungcheong
row 9 : Jeonju | Jeonju -mok( 全州牧 | Gangnam -do | Jeolla -do | North Jeolla
row 10 : Muju | Naju -mok | Haeyang -do | Jeolla -do | South Jeolla
row 11 : Muju | Seungju | Haeyang -do | Jeolla -do | South Jeolla
row 12 : Sangju | Sangju -mok | Yeongnam -do | Gyeongsang -do | North Gyeongsang
row 13 : Gangju | Jinju -mok | Sannam -do | Gyeongsang -do | Western South Gyeongsang
row 14 : Yangju | Jinju -mok | Yeongdong -do | Gyeongsang -do | Eastern South Gyeongsang
row 15 : Sakju | — | Sakbang -do | Gyoju -do | Gangwon
row 16 : Myeongju | — | Sakbang -do | Donggye | Gangwon
row 17 : — | — | Paeseo -do | Bukgye | Pyeongan [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: Which Pre-1009 province has a Post-1009 province of donggye?

Answer: Sakbang -do
[Table] header: Province of Silla | Administrative district | Pre-1009 province | Post-1009 province | Modern equivalent row 1 : Hanju | Gyeonggi ( 京畿 ) | Gyeonggi | Gyeonggi | Kaesŏng
row 2 : Hanju | Yangju -mok( 揚州牧  | Gwannae -do | Seohae -do | Hwanghae
row 3 : Hanju | Hwangju -mok( 黃州牧 | Gwannae -do | Seohae -do | North Hwanghae
row 4 : Hanju | Haeju -mok( 海州牧 | Gwannae -do | Seohae -do | South Hwanghae
row 5 : Hanju | Gwangju -mok( 廣州牧 | Gwannae -do | Yanggwang -do | Gyeonggi
row 6 : Hanju | Chungju -mok( 忠州牧 | Jungwon -do | Yanggwang -do | North Chungcheong
row 7 : Ungju | Cheongju -mok | Jungwon -do | Yanggwang -do | North Chungcheong
row 8 : Ungju | Gongju -mok | Hanam -do | Yanggwang -do | South Chungcheong
row 9 : Jeonju | Jeonju -mok( 全州牧 | Gangnam -do | Jeolla -do | North Jeolla
row 10 : Muju | Naju -mok | Haeyang -do | Jeolla -do | South Jeolla
row 11 : Muju | Seungju | Haeyang -do | Jeolla -do | South Jeolla
row 12 : Sangju | Sangju -mok | Yeongnam -do | Gyeongsang -do | North Gyeongsang
row 13 : Gangju | Jinju -mok | Sannam -do | Gyeongsang -do | Western South Gyeongsang
row 14 : Yangju | Jinju -mok | Yeongdong -do | Gyeongsang -do | Eastern South Gyeongsang
row 15 : Sakju | — | Sakbang -do | Gyoju -do | Gangwon
row 16 : Myeongju | — | Sakbang -do | Donggye | Gangwon
row 17 : — | — | Paeseo -do | Bukgye | Pyeongan [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: WHich Province of Silla has a Modern equivalent of south jeolla, and a Administrative district of seungju?

Answer: Muju
[Table] header: Year | Team | Player | Position | School row 1 : 2011 | Second Team | Calvin Craig | Attack | Simon Fraser University
row 2 : 2011 | Second Team | Spencer Robertson | Midfield | University of Oregon
row 3 : 2011 | Second Team | Mike Gerrard | Defense | University of Oregon
row 4 : 2011 | Third Team | Kevin Clark | Midfield | University of Oregon
row 5 : 2011 | Third Team | Luke Genereux | Defense | Simon Fraser University
row 6 : 2011 | Honorable Mention | Colton Dow | Attack | Simon Fraser University
row 7 : 2011 | Honorable Mention | Eric Ransom | Midfield | Simon Fraser University
row 8 : 2011 | Honorable Mention | Nick Johnston | Goalie | University of Oregon
row 9 : 2010 | Second Team | Russell Thomas | Midfield | Simon Fraser University
row 10 : 2010 | Third Team | Adam Foss | Attack | Simon Fraser University
row 11 : 2010 | Third Team | Ben Towner | Attack | Simon Fraser University
row 12 : 2010 | Third Team | Nick Johnston | Goalie | University of Oregon
row 13 : 2010 | Honorable Mention | Nathan Clare | Defense | Simon Fraser University
row 14 : 2010 | Honorable Mention | Luke Genereux | Defense | Simon Fraser University
row 15 : 2009 | First Team | Ben Towner | Attack | Simon Fraser University
row 16 : 2009 | First Team | Russell Thomas | Midfield | Simon Fraser University
row 17 : 2009 | Second Team | Adam Foss | Attack | Simon Fraser University
row 18 : 2009 | Second Team | John Matusiefsky | Midfield | University of Oregon
row 19 : 2009 | Second Team | Curtis Manning | LSM | Simon Fraser University
row 20 : 2009 | Second Team | Ben Johnson | FOS | Simon Fraser University
row 21 : 2009 | Third Team | Joe Cramer | Midfield | University of Washington
row 22 : 2009 | Honorable Mention | Matthew Miyashita | Defense | Simon Fraser University
row 23 : 2008 | First Team | Ben Towner | Attack | Simon Fraser University
row 24 : 2008 | First Team | Russell Thomas | Midfield | Simon Fraser University
row 25 : 2008 | First Team | Curtis Manning | Defensive Specialist | Simon Fraser University
row 26 : 2008 | Third Team | Townsend Hall | Midfield | University of Montana
row 27 : 2008 | Third Team | Andrew Vincent | Defense | University of Oregon
row 28 : 2008 | Honorable Mention | Justin Blackmore | Attack | University of Oregon
row 29 : 2008 | Honorable Mention | Tucker Sargent | FOS | University of Montana [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What was the lowest year that a player from midfield won first team honors?

Answer: 2008.0
[Table] header: Date | Tournament | Surface | Opponent in final | Score in final row 1 : April 26, 1999 | Munich , Germany | Clay | Franco Squillari | 6–4, 6–3
row 2 : June 14, 1999 | s’Hertogenbosch  | Grass | Patrick Rafter | 3–6, 7–6, 6–4
row 3 : October 27, 2003 | Paris , France | Carpet | Tim Henman | 6–2, 7–6, 7–6
row 4 : April 25, 2005 | Munich, Germany | Clay | David Nalbandian | 6–4, 6–1
row 5 : May 22, 2006 | Portschach , Austria | Clay | Nikolay Davydenko | 6–0, 6–3
row 6 : July 23, 2007 | Umag , Croatia | Clay | Carlos Moyà | 6–4, 6–2 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What is the date of the munich, germany tournament?

Answer: April 26, 1999, April 25, 2005
[Table] header: Date | Tournament | Surface | Opponent in final | Score in final row 1 : April 26, 1999 | Munich , Germany | Clay | Franco Squillari | 6–4, 6–3
row 2 : June 14, 1999 | s’Hertogenbosch  | Grass | Patrick Rafter | 3–6, 7–6, 6–4
row 3 : October 27, 2003 | Paris , France | Carpet | Tim Henman | 6–2, 7–6, 7–6
row 4 : April 25, 2005 | Munich, Germany | Clay | David Nalbandian | 6–4, 6–1
row 5 : May 22, 2006 | Portschach , Austria | Clay | Nikolay Davydenko | 6–0, 6–3
row 6 : July 23, 2007 | Umag , Croatia | Clay | Carlos Moyà | 6–4, 6–2 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What tournament is on October 27, 2003?

Answer: Paris , France
[Table] header: Date | Tournament | Surface | Opponent in final | Score in final row 1 : April 26, 1999 | Munich , Germany | Clay | Franco Squillari | 6–4, 6–3
row 2 : June 14, 1999 | s’Hertogenbosch  | Grass | Patrick Rafter | 3–6, 7–6, 6–4
row 3 : October 27, 2003 | Paris , France | Carpet | Tim Henman | 6–2, 7–6, 7–6
row 4 : April 25, 2005 | Munich, Germany | Clay | David Nalbandian | 6–4, 6–1
row 5 : May 22, 2006 | Portschach , Austria | Clay | Nikolay Davydenko | 6–0, 6–3
row 6 : July 23, 2007 | Umag , Croatia | Clay | Carlos Moyà | 6–4, 6–2 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: Who is the opponent in the final of the tournament on May 22, 2006?

Answer: Nikolay Davydenko
[Table] header: Date | Tournament | Surface | Opponent in final | Score in final row 1 : April 26, 1999 | Munich , Germany | Clay | Franco Squillari | 6–4, 6–3
row 2 : June 14, 1999 | s’Hertogenbosch  | Grass | Patrick Rafter | 3–6, 7–6, 6–4
row 3 : October 27, 2003 | Paris , France | Carpet | Tim Henman | 6–2, 7–6, 7–6
row 4 : April 25, 2005 | Munich, Germany | Clay | David Nalbandian | 6–4, 6–1
row 5 : May 22, 2006 | Portschach , Austria | Clay | Nikolay Davydenko | 6–0, 6–3
row 6 : July 23, 2007 | Umag , Croatia | Clay | Carlos Moyà | 6–4, 6–2 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What is the surface of the tournament with david nalbandian as the opponent in the final?

Answer: Clay
[Table] header: Place | Player | Country | Score | To par row 1 : 1 | Andy North | United States | 70-70-71=211 | –2
row 2 : 2 | Gary Player | South Africa | 71-71-70=212 | –1
row 3 : T3 | J. C. Snead | United States | 70-72-72=214 | +1
row 4 : T3 | Dave Stockton | United States | 71-73-70=214 | +1
row 5 : T5 | Seve Ballesteros | Spain | 75-69-71=215 | +2
row 6 : T5 | Andy Bean | United States | 72-72-71=215 | +2
row 7 : T5 | Johnny Miller | United States | 78-69-68=215 | +2
row 8 : T10 | Tom Kite | United States | 73-73-70=216 | +3
row 9 : T10 | Billy Kratzert | United States | 72-74-70=216 | +3
row 10 : T10 | Jack Nicklaus | United States | 73-69-74=216 | +3 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: Who was the player from the United States with a score of 70-70-71=211?

Answer: Andy North
[Table] header: Place | Player | Country | Score | To par row 1 : 1 | Andy North | United States | 70-70-71=211 | –2
row 2 : 2 | Gary Player | South Africa | 71-71-70=212 | –1
row 3 : T3 | J. C. Snead | United States | 70-72-72=214 | +1
row 4 : T3 | Dave Stockton | United States | 71-73-70=214 | +1
row 5 : T5 | Seve Ballesteros | Spain | 75-69-71=215 | +2
row 6 : T5 | Andy Bean | United States | 72-72-71=215 | +2
row 7 : T5 | Johnny Miller | United States | 78-69-68=215 | +2
row 8 : T10 | Tom Kite | United States | 73-73-70=216 | +3
row 9 : T10 | Billy Kratzert | United States | 72-74-70=216 | +3
row 10 : T10 | Jack Nicklaus | United States | 73-69-74=216 | +3 [/Table] Answer this question based on the above table: What place was Dave Stockton when he had a to par of +1?

Answer: T3