sail/symbolic-instruction-tuning huggingface dataset:
Please answer a question about the following table 

header: No. | Date | Tournament | Surface | Partnering | Opponent in the final | Score row 1 : 1.0 | September 13, 2010 | Ecuador F2 | Hard | Roberto Quiroz | Peter Aarts  Christopher Racz | 6-4, 6-4
row 2 : 2.0 | April 4, 2011 | Chile F2 | Clay | Sergio Galdos | Guillermo Hormazabal Rodrig | 5-7, 7-6(5), [10-5
row 3 : 3.0 | April 11, 2011 | Chile F3 | Clay | Roberto Quiroz | Luis David Martinez Miguel Angel Reyes-V | 6-4, 7-5
row 4 : 4.0 | August 8, 2011 | Peru F1 | Clay | Sergio Galdos | Martin Cuevas  Guido Pella | 6-4, 6-0
row 5 : 5.0 | August 5, 2012 | Manta | Hard | Renzo Olivo | Victor Estrella  Joao Souza | 6-3, 6-0
row 6 : 6.0 | August 20, 2012 | Colombia F2 | Clay | Ariel Behar | Nicolas Barrientos  Michael Quintero | 2-1 Ret.
row 7 : 7.0 | August 26, 2012 | Ecuador F3 | Clay | Sergio Galdos | Mauricio Echazu Guillerm | 6-2, 6-1
row 8 : 8.0 | October 8, 2012 | Chile F8 | Clay | Gustavo Sterin | Cristobal Saavedra-Corval | 6-4, 7-5
row 9 : 9.0 | May 13, 2013 | Argentina F6 | Clay | Sergio Galdos | Franco Agamenone  Jose Angel Carrizo | 4-6, 6-4, [10-1]
row 10 : 10.0 | May 27, 2013 | Argentina F8 | Clay | Sergio Galdos | Daniel Dutra da Silva  Pablo Galdon | 6-0, 7-5

what kind of surface did they play on september 13, 2010? what tournament was played on may 27, 2013?

Answer: Argentina F8
Please answer a question about the following table 

header: Rank | Nation | Gold | Silver | Bronze | Total row 1 : 1 | Soviet Union | 26 | 17 | 15 | 58
row 2 : 2 | United States | 22 | 18 | 11 | 51
row 3 : 3 | East Germany | 8 | 3 | 4 | 15
row 4 : 4 | Italy | 4 | 4 | 6 | 14
row 5 : 5 | Japan | 3 | 7 | 5 | 15
row 6 : 6 | Hungary | 3 | 6 | 6 | 15
row 7 : 7 | West Germany | 3 | 6 | 4 | 13
row 8 : 8 | United Kingdom | 3 | 4 | 7 | 14
row 9 : 9 | Poland | 3 | 1 | 5 | 9
row 10 : 10 | Yugoslavia | 3 | 1 | 1 | 5
row 11 : 11 | Netherlands | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4
row 12 : 12 | Austria | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3
row 13 : 12 | Bulgaria | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3
row 14 : 14 | France | 1 | 0 | 4 | 5
row 15 : 15 | Romania | 0 | 4 | 2 | 6
row 16 : 16 | Cuba | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4
row 17 : 17 | Australia | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1
row 18 : 17 | Czechoslovakia | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1
row 19 : 17 | Greece | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1
row 20 : 17 | Sweden | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1
row 21 : 21 | Canada | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1
row 22 : 21 | South Korea | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1
row 23 : 21 | Madagascar | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1
row 24 : 21 | Panama | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1
row 25 : Total | Total | 82 | 80 | 80 | 242

what are all of the listed nations?

Answer: Soviet Union, United States, East Germany, Italy, Japan, Hungary, West Germany, United Kingdom, Poland, Yugoslavia, Netherlands, Austria, Bulgaria, France, Romania, Cuba, Australia, Czechoslovakia, Greece, Sweden, Canada, South Korea, Madagascar, Panama
Please answer a question about the following table 

header: Rank | Nation | Gold | Silver | Bronze | Total row 1 : 1 | Soviet Union | 26 | 17 | 15 | 58
row 2 : 2 | United States | 22 | 18 | 11 | 51
row 3 : 3 | East Germany | 8 | 3 | 4 | 15
row 4 : 4 | Italy | 4 | 4 | 6 | 14
row 5 : 5 | Japan | 3 | 7 | 5 | 15
row 6 : 6 | Hungary | 3 | 6 | 6 | 15
row 7 : 7 | West Germany | 3 | 6 | 4 | 13
row 8 : 8 | United Kingdom | 3 | 4 | 7 | 14
row 9 : 9 | Poland | 3 | 1 | 5 | 9
row 10 : 10 | Yugoslavia | 3 | 1 | 1 | 5
row 11 : 11 | Netherlands | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4
row 12 : 12 | Austria | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3
row 13 : 12 | Bulgaria | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3
row 14 : 14 | France | 1 | 0 | 4 | 5
row 15 : 15 | Romania | 0 | 4 | 2 | 6
row 16 : 16 | Cuba | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4
row 17 : 17 | Australia | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1
row 18 : 17 | Czechoslovakia | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1
row 19 : 17 | Greece | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1
row 20 : 17 | Sweden | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1
row 21 : 21 | Canada | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1
row 22 : 21 | South Korea | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1
row 23 : 21 | Madagascar | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1
row 24 : 21 | Panama | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1
row 25 : Total | Total | 82 | 80 | 80 | 242

what are all of the listed nations? how many bronze medals did they receive?

Answer: 15, 11, 4, 6, 5, 6, 4, 7, 5, 1, 2, 1, 1, 4, 2, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1
Please answer a question about the following table 

header: Rank | Nation | Gold | Silver | Bronze | Total row 1 : 1 | Soviet Union | 26 | 17 | 15 | 58
row 2 : 2 | United States | 22 | 18 | 11 | 51
row 3 : 3 | East Germany | 8 | 3 | 4 | 15
row 4 : 4 | Italy | 4 | 4 | 6 | 14
row 5 : 5 | Japan | 3 | 7 | 5 | 15
row 6 : 6 | Hungary | 3 | 6 | 6 | 15
row 7 : 7 | West Germany | 3 | 6 | 4 | 13
row 8 : 8 | United Kingdom | 3 | 4 | 7 | 14
row 9 : 9 | Poland | 3 | 1 | 5 | 9
row 10 : 10 | Yugoslavia | 3 | 1 | 1 | 5
row 11 : 11 | Netherlands | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4
row 12 : 12 | Austria | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3
row 13 : 12 | Bulgaria | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3
row 14 : 14 | France | 1 | 0 | 4 | 5
row 15 : 15 | Romania | 0 | 4 | 2 | 6
row 16 : 16 | Cuba | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4
row 17 : 17 | Australia | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1
row 18 : 17 | Czechoslovakia | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1
row 19 : 17 | Greece | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1
row 20 : 17 | Sweden | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1
row 21 : 21 | Canada | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1
row 22 : 21 | South Korea | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1
row 23 : 21 | Madagascar | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1
row 24 : 21 | Panama | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1
row 25 : Total | Total | 82 | 80 | 80 | 242

what are all of the listed nations? how many bronze medals did they receive? what about just romania and yugoslavia?

Answer: 1, 2
Please answer a question about the following table 

header: Rank | Nation | Gold | Silver | Bronze | Total row 1 : 1 | Soviet Union | 26 | 17 | 15 | 58
row 2 : 2 | United States | 22 | 18 | 11 | 51
row 3 : 3 | East Germany | 8 | 3 | 4 | 15
row 4 : 4 | Italy | 4 | 4 | 6 | 14
row 5 : 5 | Japan | 3 | 7 | 5 | 15
row 6 : 6 | Hungary | 3 | 6 | 6 | 15
row 7 : 7 | West Germany | 3 | 6 | 4 | 13
row 8 : 8 | United Kingdom | 3 | 4 | 7 | 14
row 9 : 9 | Poland | 3 | 1 | 5 | 9
row 10 : 10 | Yugoslavia | 3 | 1 | 1 | 5
row 11 : 11 | Netherlands | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4
row 12 : 12 | Austria | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3
row 13 : 12 | Bulgaria | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3
row 14 : 14 | France | 1 | 0 | 4 | 5
row 15 : 15 | Romania | 0 | 4 | 2 | 6
row 16 : 16 | Cuba | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4
row 17 : 17 | Australia | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1
row 18 : 17 | Czechoslovakia | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1
row 19 : 17 | Greece | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1
row 20 : 17 | Sweden | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1
row 21 : 21 | Canada | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1
row 22 : 21 | South Korea | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1
row 23 : 21 | Madagascar | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1
row 24 : 21 | Panama | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1
row 25 : Total | Total | 82 | 80 | 80 | 242

what are all of the listed nations? how many bronze medals did they receive? what about just romania and yugoslavia? which of the two won more?

Answer: Romania
Please answer a question about the following table 

header: Rank | Nation | Gold | Silver | Bronze | Total row 1 : 1 | Soviet Union | 26 | 17 | 15 | 58
row 2 : 2 | United States | 22 | 18 | 11 | 51
row 3 : 3 | East Germany | 8 | 3 | 4 | 15
row 4 : 4 | Italy | 4 | 4 | 6 | 14
row 5 : 5 | Japan | 3 | 7 | 5 | 15
row 6 : 6 | Hungary | 3 | 6 | 6 | 15
row 7 : 7 | West Germany | 3 | 6 | 4 | 13
row 8 : 8 | United Kingdom | 3 | 4 | 7 | 14
row 9 : 9 | Poland | 3 | 1 | 5 | 9
row 10 : 10 | Yugoslavia | 3 | 1 | 1 | 5
row 11 : 11 | Netherlands | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4
row 12 : 12 | Austria | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3
row 13 : 12 | Bulgaria | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3
row 14 : 14 | France | 1 | 0 | 4 | 5
row 15 : 15 | Romania | 0 | 4 | 2 | 6
row 16 : 16 | Cuba | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4
row 17 : 17 | Australia | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1
row 18 : 17 | Czechoslovakia | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1
row 19 : 17 | Greece | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1
row 20 : 17 | Sweden | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1
row 21 : 21 | Canada | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1
row 22 : 21 | South Korea | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1
row 23 : 21 | Madagascar | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1
row 24 : 21 | Panama | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1
row 25 : Total | Total | 82 | 80 | 80 | 242

how many bronze medals did romania win?

Answer: 2
Please answer a question about the following table 

header: Rank | Nation | Gold | Silver | Bronze | Total row 1 : 1 | Soviet Union | 26 | 17 | 15 | 58
row 2 : 2 | United States | 22 | 18 | 11 | 51
row 3 : 3 | East Germany | 8 | 3 | 4 | 15
row 4 : 4 | Italy | 4 | 4 | 6 | 14
row 5 : 5 | Japan | 3 | 7 | 5 | 15
row 6 : 6 | Hungary | 3 | 6 | 6 | 15
row 7 : 7 | West Germany | 3 | 6 | 4 | 13
row 8 : 8 | United Kingdom | 3 | 4 | 7 | 14
row 9 : 9 | Poland | 3 | 1 | 5 | 9
row 10 : 10 | Yugoslavia | 3 | 1 | 1 | 5
row 11 : 11 | Netherlands | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4
row 12 : 12 | Austria | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3
row 13 : 12 | Bulgaria | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3
row 14 : 14 | France | 1 | 0 | 4 | 5
row 15 : 15 | Romania | 0 | 4 | 2 | 6
row 16 : 16 | Cuba | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4
row 17 : 17 | Australia | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1
row 18 : 17 | Czechoslovakia | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1
row 19 : 17 | Greece | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1
row 20 : 17 | Sweden | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1
row 21 : 21 | Canada | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1
row 22 : 21 | South Korea | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1
row 23 : 21 | Madagascar | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1
row 24 : 21 | Panama | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1
row 25 : Total | Total | 82 | 80 | 80 | 242

how many bronze medals did romania win? how many bronze medals did yugoslavia win?

Answer: 1
Please answer a question about the following table 

header: Rank | Nation | Gold | Silver | Bronze | Total row 1 : 1 | Soviet Union | 26 | 17 | 15 | 58
row 2 : 2 | United States | 22 | 18 | 11 | 51
row 3 : 3 | East Germany | 8 | 3 | 4 | 15
row 4 : 4 | Italy | 4 | 4 | 6 | 14
row 5 : 5 | Japan | 3 | 7 | 5 | 15
row 6 : 6 | Hungary | 3 | 6 | 6 | 15
row 7 : 7 | West Germany | 3 | 6 | 4 | 13
row 8 : 8 | United Kingdom | 3 | 4 | 7 | 14
row 9 : 9 | Poland | 3 | 1 | 5 | 9
row 10 : 10 | Yugoslavia | 3 | 1 | 1 | 5
row 11 : 11 | Netherlands | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4
row 12 : 12 | Austria | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3
row 13 : 12 | Bulgaria | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3
row 14 : 14 | France | 1 | 0 | 4 | 5
row 15 : 15 | Romania | 0 | 4 | 2 | 6
row 16 : 16 | Cuba | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4
row 17 : 17 | Australia | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1
row 18 : 17 | Czechoslovakia | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1
row 19 : 17 | Greece | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1
row 20 : 17 | Sweden | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1
row 21 : 21 | Canada | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1
row 22 : 21 | South Korea | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1
row 23 : 21 | Madagascar | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1
row 24 : 21 | Panama | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1
row 25 : Total | Total | 82 | 80 | 80 | 242

how many bronze medals did romania win? how many bronze medals did yugoslavia win? which of these countries won more bronze medals?

Answer: Romania
Please answer a question about the following table 

header: Rank | Nation | Gold | Silver | Bronze | Total row 1 : 1 | Soviet Union | 26 | 17 | 15 | 58
row 2 : 2 | United States | 22 | 18 | 11 | 51
row 3 : 3 | East Germany | 8 | 3 | 4 | 15
row 4 : 4 | Italy | 4 | 4 | 6 | 14
row 5 : 5 | Japan | 3 | 7 | 5 | 15
row 6 : 6 | Hungary | 3 | 6 | 6 | 15
row 7 : 7 | West Germany | 3 | 6 | 4 | 13
row 8 : 8 | United Kingdom | 3 | 4 | 7 | 14
row 9 : 9 | Poland | 3 | 1 | 5 | 9
row 10 : 10 | Yugoslavia | 3 | 1 | 1 | 5
row 11 : 11 | Netherlands | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4
row 12 : 12 | Austria | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3
row 13 : 12 | Bulgaria | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3
row 14 : 14 | France | 1 | 0 | 4 | 5
row 15 : 15 | Romania | 0 | 4 | 2 | 6
row 16 : 16 | Cuba | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4
row 17 : 17 | Australia | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1
row 18 : 17 | Czechoslovakia | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1
row 19 : 17 | Greece | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1
row 20 : 17 | Sweden | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1
row 21 : 21 | Canada | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1
row 22 : 21 | South Korea | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1
row 23 : 21 | Madagascar | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1
row 24 : 21 | Panama | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1
row 25 : Total | Total | 82 | 80 | 80 | 242

which countries were part of the 1970 summer universiade?

Answer: Soviet Union, United States, East Germany, Italy, Japan, Hungary, West Germany, United Kingdom, Poland, Yugoslavia, Netherlands, Austria, Bulgaria, France, Romania, Cuba, Australia, Czechoslovakia, Greece, Sweden, Canada, South Korea, Madagascar, Panama
Please answer a question about the following table 

header: Rank | Nation | Gold | Silver | Bronze | Total row 1 : 1 | Soviet Union | 26 | 17 | 15 | 58
row 2 : 2 | United States | 22 | 18 | 11 | 51
row 3 : 3 | East Germany | 8 | 3 | 4 | 15
row 4 : 4 | Italy | 4 | 4 | 6 | 14
row 5 : 5 | Japan | 3 | 7 | 5 | 15
row 6 : 6 | Hungary | 3 | 6 | 6 | 15
row 7 : 7 | West Germany | 3 | 6 | 4 | 13
row 8 : 8 | United Kingdom | 3 | 4 | 7 | 14
row 9 : 9 | Poland | 3 | 1 | 5 | 9
row 10 : 10 | Yugoslavia | 3 | 1 | 1 | 5
row 11 : 11 | Netherlands | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4
row 12 : 12 | Austria | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3
row 13 : 12 | Bulgaria | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3
row 14 : 14 | France | 1 | 0 | 4 | 5
row 15 : 15 | Romania | 0 | 4 | 2 | 6
row 16 : 16 | Cuba | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4
row 17 : 17 | Australia | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1
row 18 : 17 | Czechoslovakia | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1
row 19 : 17 | Greece | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1
row 20 : 17 | Sweden | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1
row 21 : 21 | Canada | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1
row 22 : 21 | South Korea | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1
row 23 : 21 | Madagascar | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1
row 24 : 21 | Panama | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1
row 25 : Total | Total | 82 | 80 | 80 | 242

which countries were part of the 1970 summer universiade? which ones did not win a gold medal?

Answer: Romania, Cuba, Australia, Czechoslovakia, Greece, Sweden, Canada, South Korea, Madagascar, Panama
Please answer a question about the following table 

header: Rank | Nation | Gold | Silver | Bronze | Total row 1 : 1 | Soviet Union | 26 | 17 | 15 | 58
row 2 : 2 | United States | 22 | 18 | 11 | 51
row 3 : 3 | East Germany | 8 | 3 | 4 | 15
row 4 : 4 | Italy | 4 | 4 | 6 | 14
row 5 : 5 | Japan | 3 | 7 | 5 | 15
row 6 : 6 | Hungary | 3 | 6 | 6 | 15
row 7 : 7 | West Germany | 3 | 6 | 4 | 13
row 8 : 8 | United Kingdom | 3 | 4 | 7 | 14
row 9 : 9 | Poland | 3 | 1 | 5 | 9
row 10 : 10 | Yugoslavia | 3 | 1 | 1 | 5
row 11 : 11 | Netherlands | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4
row 12 : 12 | Austria | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3
row 13 : 12 | Bulgaria | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3
row 14 : 14 | France | 1 | 0 | 4 | 5
row 15 : 15 | Romania | 0 | 4 | 2 | 6
row 16 : 16 | Cuba | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4
row 17 : 17 | Australia | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1
row 18 : 17 | Czechoslovakia | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1
row 19 : 17 | Greece | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1
row 20 : 17 | Sweden | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1
row 21 : 21 | Canada | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1
row 22 : 21 | South Korea | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1
row 23 : 21 | Madagascar | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1
row 24 : 21 | Panama | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1
row 25 : Total | Total | 82 | 80 | 80 | 242

which countries were part of the 1970 summer universiade? which ones did not win a gold medal? of these, which one got the most medals?

Answer: Romania
Please answer a question about the following table 

header: Opus | Title | Subdivisions | Compo-sition | Premiere date | Place, theatre row 1 : 1 | Der Barenhauter | 3 acts | 1898 | 22 January 1899 | Munich, Hofopera
row 2 : 2 | Herzog Wildfang | 3 acts | 1900 | 23 March 1901 | Munich, Hofopera
row 3 : 3 | Der Kobold | 3 acts | 1903 | 29 January 1904 | Hamburg, Stadttheater
row 4 : 4 | Bruder Lustig | 3 acts | 1904 | 13 October 1905 | Hamburg, Stadttheater
row 5 : 5 | Sternengebot | prologue and 3 acts | 1906 | 21 January 1908 | Hamburg, Stadttheater
row 6 : 6 | Banadietrich | 3 acts | 1909 | 23 January 1910 | Karlsruhe, Hoftheater
row 7 : 7 | Schwarzschwanenreich | 3 acts | 1910 | 5 November 1918 | Karlsruhe, Hoftheater
row 8 : 8 | Sonnenflammen | 3 acts | 1912 | 30 October 1918 | Darmstadt, Hoftheater
row 9 : 9 | Der Heidenkonig | prologue and 3 acts | 1913 | 16 December 1933 | Cologne, Stadtische Buhnen
row 10 : 10 | Der Friedensengel | 3 acts | 1914 | 4 March 1926 | Karlsruhe, Badisches Landestheater
row 11 : 11 | An allem ist Hutchen Schuld! | 3 acts | 1915 | 6 December 1917 | Stuttgart, Hofopera
row 12 : 12a | Das Liebesopfer (libret | 4 acts | 1917 | nan | nan
row 13 : 13 | Der Schmied von Marienburg | 3 acts | 1920 | 16 December 1920 | Rostock, Stadtische Buhnen
row 14 : 14 | Rainulf und Adelasia | 3 acts | 1922 | 1923 | Rostock (prelude only)
row 15 : 15 | Die heilige Linde | 3 acts | 1927 | 2001 | Keulen (prelude only)
row 16 : 16 | Wahnopfer | 3 acts | 1928 | 1994 | Rudolstadt, Heidecksburg only
row 17 : 17 | Walamund (libretto only, | 3 acts | 1928 | nan | nan
row 18 : 18 | Das Fluchlein, das Jeder mitbekam | 3 acts | 1929 | 29 April 1984 | Kiel (completed by Hans Peter Mohr

which operas were composed after 1912?

Answer: Der Heidenkonig, Der Friedensengel, An allem ist Hutchen Schuld!, Das Liebesopfer (libretto only, no music completed), Der Schmied von Marienburg, Rainulf und Adelasia, Die heilige Linde, Wahnopfer, Walamund (libretto only, no music completed), Das Fluchlein, das Jeder mitbekam
Please answer a question about the following table 

header: Opus | Title | Subdivisions | Compo-sition | Premiere date | Place, theatre row 1 : 1 | Der Barenhauter | 3 acts | 1898 | 22 January 1899 | Munich, Hofopera
row 2 : 2 | Herzog Wildfang | 3 acts | 1900 | 23 March 1901 | Munich, Hofopera
row 3 : 3 | Der Kobold | 3 acts | 1903 | 29 January 1904 | Hamburg, Stadttheater
row 4 : 4 | Bruder Lustig | 3 acts | 1904 | 13 October 1905 | Hamburg, Stadttheater
row 5 : 5 | Sternengebot | prologue and 3 acts | 1906 | 21 January 1908 | Hamburg, Stadttheater
row 6 : 6 | Banadietrich | 3 acts | 1909 | 23 January 1910 | Karlsruhe, Hoftheater
row 7 : 7 | Schwarzschwanenreich | 3 acts | 1910 | 5 November 1918 | Karlsruhe, Hoftheater
row 8 : 8 | Sonnenflammen | 3 acts | 1912 | 30 October 1918 | Darmstadt, Hoftheater
row 9 : 9 | Der Heidenkonig | prologue and 3 acts | 1913 | 16 December 1933 | Cologne, Stadtische Buhnen
row 10 : 10 | Der Friedensengel | 3 acts | 1914 | 4 March 1926 | Karlsruhe, Badisches Landestheater
row 11 : 11 | An allem ist Hutchen Schuld! | 3 acts | 1915 | 6 December 1917 | Stuttgart, Hofopera
row 12 : 12a | Das Liebesopfer (libret | 4 acts | 1917 | nan | nan
row 13 : 13 | Der Schmied von Marienburg | 3 acts | 1920 | 16 December 1920 | Rostock, Stadtische Buhnen
row 14 : 14 | Rainulf und Adelasia | 3 acts | 1922 | 1923 | Rostock (prelude only)
row 15 : 15 | Die heilige Linde | 3 acts | 1927 | 2001 | Keulen (prelude only)
row 16 : 16 | Wahnopfer | 3 acts | 1928 | 1994 | Rudolstadt, Heidecksburg only
row 17 : 17 | Walamund (libretto only, | 3 acts | 1928 | nan | nan
row 18 : 18 | Das Fluchlein, das Jeder mitbekam | 3 acts | 1929 | 29 April 1984 | Kiel (completed by Hans Peter Mohr

which operas were composed after 1912? of these, which two had no music completed?

Answer: Das Liebesopfer (libretto only, no music completed), Walamund (libretto only, no music completed)
Please answer a question about the following table 

header: Opus | Title | Subdivisions | Compo-sition | Premiere date | Place, theatre row 1 : 1 | Der Barenhauter | 3 acts | 1898 | 22 January 1899 | Munich, Hofopera
row 2 : 2 | Herzog Wildfang | 3 acts | 1900 | 23 March 1901 | Munich, Hofopera
row 3 : 3 | Der Kobold | 3 acts | 1903 | 29 January 1904 | Hamburg, Stadttheater
row 4 : 4 | Bruder Lustig | 3 acts | 1904 | 13 October 1905 | Hamburg, Stadttheater
row 5 : 5 | Sternengebot | prologue and 3 acts | 1906 | 21 January 1908 | Hamburg, Stadttheater
row 6 : 6 | Banadietrich | 3 acts | 1909 | 23 January 1910 | Karlsruhe, Hoftheater
row 7 : 7 | Schwarzschwanenreich | 3 acts | 1910 | 5 November 1918 | Karlsruhe, Hoftheater
row 8 : 8 | Sonnenflammen | 3 acts | 1912 | 30 October 1918 | Darmstadt, Hoftheater
row 9 : 9 | Der Heidenkonig | prologue and 3 acts | 1913 | 16 December 1933 | Cologne, Stadtische Buhnen
row 10 : 10 | Der Friedensengel | 3 acts | 1914 | 4 March 1926 | Karlsruhe, Badisches Landestheater
row 11 : 11 | An allem ist Hutchen Schuld! | 3 acts | 1915 | 6 December 1917 | Stuttgart, Hofopera
row 12 : 12a | Das Liebesopfer (libret | 4 acts | 1917 | nan | nan
row 13 : 13 | Der Schmied von Marienburg | 3 acts | 1920 | 16 December 1920 | Rostock, Stadtische Buhnen
row 14 : 14 | Rainulf und Adelasia | 3 acts | 1922 | 1923 | Rostock (prelude only)
row 15 : 15 | Die heilige Linde | 3 acts | 1927 | 2001 | Keulen (prelude only)
row 16 : 16 | Wahnopfer | 3 acts | 1928 | 1994 | Rudolstadt, Heidecksburg only
row 17 : 17 | Walamund (libretto only, | 3 acts | 1928 | nan | nan
row 18 : 18 | Das Fluchlein, das Jeder mitbekam | 3 acts | 1929 | 29 April 1984 | Kiel (completed by Hans Peter Mohr

which operas were composed after 1912? of these, which two had no music completed? which of the above two had the most acts?

Answer: Das Liebesopfer (libretto only, no music completed)
Please answer a question about the following table 

header: Opus | Title | Subdivisions | Compo-sition | Premiere date | Place, theatre row 1 : 1 | Der Barenhauter | 3 acts | 1898 | 22 January 1899 | Munich, Hofopera
row 2 : 2 | Herzog Wildfang | 3 acts | 1900 | 23 March 1901 | Munich, Hofopera
row 3 : 3 | Der Kobold | 3 acts | 1903 | 29 January 1904 | Hamburg, Stadttheater
row 4 : 4 | Bruder Lustig | 3 acts | 1904 | 13 October 1905 | Hamburg, Stadttheater
row 5 : 5 | Sternengebot | prologue and 3 acts | 1906 | 21 January 1908 | Hamburg, Stadttheater
row 6 : 6 | Banadietrich | 3 acts | 1909 | 23 January 1910 | Karlsruhe, Hoftheater
row 7 : 7 | Schwarzschwanenreich | 3 acts | 1910 | 5 November 1918 | Karlsruhe, Hoftheater
row 8 : 8 | Sonnenflammen | 3 acts | 1912 | 30 October 1918 | Darmstadt, Hoftheater
row 9 : 9 | Der Heidenkonig | prologue and 3 acts | 1913 | 16 December 1933 | Cologne, Stadtische Buhnen
row 10 : 10 | Der Friedensengel | 3 acts | 1914 | 4 March 1926 | Karlsruhe, Badisches Landestheater
row 11 : 11 | An allem ist Hutchen Schuld! | 3 acts | 1915 | 6 December 1917 | Stuttgart, Hofopera
row 12 : 12a | Das Liebesopfer (libret | 4 acts | 1917 | nan | nan
row 13 : 13 | Der Schmied von Marienburg | 3 acts | 1920 | 16 December 1920 | Rostock, Stadtische Buhnen
row 14 : 14 | Rainulf und Adelasia | 3 acts | 1922 | 1923 | Rostock (prelude only)
row 15 : 15 | Die heilige Linde | 3 acts | 1927 | 2001 | Keulen (prelude only)
row 16 : 16 | Wahnopfer | 3 acts | 1928 | 1994 | Rudolstadt, Heidecksburg only
row 17 : 17 | Walamund (libretto only, | 3 acts | 1928 | nan | nan
row 18 : 18 | Das Fluchlein, das Jeder mitbekam | 3 acts | 1929 | 29 April 1984 | Kiel (completed by Hans Peter Mohr

what are the titles?

Answer: Der Barenhauter, Herzog Wildfang, Der Kobold, Bruder Lustig, Sternengebot, Banadietrich, Schwarzschwanenreich, Sonnenflammen, Der Heidenkonig, Der Friedensengel, An allem ist Hutchen Schuld!, Das Liebesopfer (libretto only, no music completed), Der Schmied von Marienburg, Rainulf und Adelasia, Die heilige Linde, Wahnopfer, Walamund (libretto only, no music completed), Das Fluchlein, das Jeder mitbekam
Please answer a question about the following table 

header: Opus | Title | Subdivisions | Compo-sition | Premiere date | Place, theatre row 1 : 1 | Der Barenhauter | 3 acts | 1898 | 22 January 1899 | Munich, Hofopera
row 2 : 2 | Herzog Wildfang | 3 acts | 1900 | 23 March 1901 | Munich, Hofopera
row 3 : 3 | Der Kobold | 3 acts | 1903 | 29 January 1904 | Hamburg, Stadttheater
row 4 : 4 | Bruder Lustig | 3 acts | 1904 | 13 October 1905 | Hamburg, Stadttheater
row 5 : 5 | Sternengebot | prologue and 3 acts | 1906 | 21 January 1908 | Hamburg, Stadttheater
row 6 : 6 | Banadietrich | 3 acts | 1909 | 23 January 1910 | Karlsruhe, Hoftheater
row 7 : 7 | Schwarzschwanenreich | 3 acts | 1910 | 5 November 1918 | Karlsruhe, Hoftheater
row 8 : 8 | Sonnenflammen | 3 acts | 1912 | 30 October 1918 | Darmstadt, Hoftheater
row 9 : 9 | Der Heidenkonig | prologue and 3 acts | 1913 | 16 December 1933 | Cologne, Stadtische Buhnen
row 10 : 10 | Der Friedensengel | 3 acts | 1914 | 4 March 1926 | Karlsruhe, Badisches Landestheater
row 11 : 11 | An allem ist Hutchen Schuld! | 3 acts | 1915 | 6 December 1917 | Stuttgart, Hofopera
row 12 : 12a | Das Liebesopfer (libret | 4 acts | 1917 | nan | nan
row 13 : 13 | Der Schmied von Marienburg | 3 acts | 1920 | 16 December 1920 | Rostock, Stadtische Buhnen
row 14 : 14 | Rainulf und Adelasia | 3 acts | 1922 | 1923 | Rostock (prelude only)
row 15 : 15 | Die heilige Linde | 3 acts | 1927 | 2001 | Keulen (prelude only)
row 16 : 16 | Wahnopfer | 3 acts | 1928 | 1994 | Rudolstadt, Heidecksburg only
row 17 : 17 | Walamund (libretto only, | 3 acts | 1928 | nan | nan
row 18 : 18 | Das Fluchlein, das Jeder mitbekam | 3 acts | 1929 | 29 April 1984 | Kiel (completed by Hans Peter Mohr

what are the titles? which were composed between 1910-1920?

Answer: Schwarzschwanenreich, Sonnenflammen, Der Heidenkonig, Der Friedensengel, An allem ist Hutchen Schuld!, Das Liebesopfer (libretto only, no music completed), Der Schmied von Marienburg
Please answer a question about the following table 

header: Opus | Title | Subdivisions | Compo-sition | Premiere date | Place, theatre row 1 : 1 | Der Barenhauter | 3 acts | 1898 | 22 January 1899 | Munich, Hofopera
row 2 : 2 | Herzog Wildfang | 3 acts | 1900 | 23 March 1901 | Munich, Hofopera
row 3 : 3 | Der Kobold | 3 acts | 1903 | 29 January 1904 | Hamburg, Stadttheater
row 4 : 4 | Bruder Lustig | 3 acts | 1904 | 13 October 1905 | Hamburg, Stadttheater
row 5 : 5 | Sternengebot | prologue and 3 acts | 1906 | 21 January 1908 | Hamburg, Stadttheater
row 6 : 6 | Banadietrich | 3 acts | 1909 | 23 January 1910 | Karlsruhe, Hoftheater
row 7 : 7 | Schwarzschwanenreich | 3 acts | 1910 | 5 November 1918 | Karlsruhe, Hoftheater
row 8 : 8 | Sonnenflammen | 3 acts | 1912 | 30 October 1918 | Darmstadt, Hoftheater
row 9 : 9 | Der Heidenkonig | prologue and 3 acts | 1913 | 16 December 1933 | Cologne, Stadtische Buhnen
row 10 : 10 | Der Friedensengel | 3 acts | 1914 | 4 March 1926 | Karlsruhe, Badisches Landestheater
row 11 : 11 | An allem ist Hutchen Schuld! | 3 acts | 1915 | 6 December 1917 | Stuttgart, Hofopera
row 12 : 12a | Das Liebesopfer (libret | 4 acts | 1917 | nan | nan
row 13 : 13 | Der Schmied von Marienburg | 3 acts | 1920 | 16 December 1920 | Rostock, Stadtische Buhnen
row 14 : 14 | Rainulf und Adelasia | 3 acts | 1922 | 1923 | Rostock (prelude only)
row 15 : 15 | Die heilige Linde | 3 acts | 1927 | 2001 | Keulen (prelude only)
row 16 : 16 | Wahnopfer | 3 acts | 1928 | 1994 | Rudolstadt, Heidecksburg only
row 17 : 17 | Walamund (libretto only, | 3 acts | 1928 | nan | nan
row 18 : 18 | Das Fluchlein, das Jeder mitbekam | 3 acts | 1929 | 29 April 1984 | Kiel (completed by Hans Peter Mohr

what are the titles? which were composed between 1910-1920? of those, which had the most acts?

Answer: Das Liebesopfer (libretto only, no music completed)
Please answer a question about the following table 

header: Opus | Title | Subdivisions | Compo-sition | Premiere date | Place, theatre row 1 : 1 | Der Barenhauter | 3 acts | 1898 | 22 January 1899 | Munich, Hofopera
row 2 : 2 | Herzog Wildfang | 3 acts | 1900 | 23 March 1901 | Munich, Hofopera
row 3 : 3 | Der Kobold | 3 acts | 1903 | 29 January 1904 | Hamburg, Stadttheater
row 4 : 4 | Bruder Lustig | 3 acts | 1904 | 13 October 1905 | Hamburg, Stadttheater
row 5 : 5 | Sternengebot | prologue and 3 acts | 1906 | 21 January 1908 | Hamburg, Stadttheater
row 6 : 6 | Banadietrich | 3 acts | 1909 | 23 January 1910 | Karlsruhe, Hoftheater
row 7 : 7 | Schwarzschwanenreich | 3 acts | 1910 | 5 November 1918 | Karlsruhe, Hoftheater
row 8 : 8 | Sonnenflammen | 3 acts | 1912 | 30 October 1918 | Darmstadt, Hoftheater
row 9 : 9 | Der Heidenkonig | prologue and 3 acts | 1913 | 16 December 1933 | Cologne, Stadtische Buhnen
row 10 : 10 | Der Friedensengel | 3 acts | 1914 | 4 March 1926 | Karlsruhe, Badisches Landestheater
row 11 : 11 | An allem ist Hutchen Schuld! | 3 acts | 1915 | 6 December 1917 | Stuttgart, Hofopera
row 12 : 12a | Das Liebesopfer (libret | 4 acts | 1917 | nan | nan
row 13 : 13 | Der Schmied von Marienburg | 3 acts | 1920 | 16 December 1920 | Rostock, Stadtische Buhnen
row 14 : 14 | Rainulf und Adelasia | 3 acts | 1922 | 1923 | Rostock (prelude only)
row 15 : 15 | Die heilige Linde | 3 acts | 1927 | 2001 | Keulen (prelude only)
row 16 : 16 | Wahnopfer | 3 acts | 1928 | 1994 | Rudolstadt, Heidecksburg only
row 17 : 17 | Walamund (libretto only, | 3 acts | 1928 | nan | nan
row 18 : 18 | Das Fluchlein, das Jeder mitbekam | 3 acts | 1929 | 29 April 1984 | Kiel (completed by Hans Peter Mohr

what are all of the titles?

Answer: Der Barenhauter, Herzog Wildfang, Der Kobold, Bruder Lustig, Sternengebot, Banadietrich, Schwarzschwanenreich, Sonnenflammen, Der Heidenkonig, Der Friedensengel, An allem ist Hutchen Schuld!, Das Liebesopfer (libretto only, no music completed), Der Schmied von Marienburg, Rainulf und Adelasia, Die heilige Linde, Wahnopfer, Walamund (libretto only, no music completed), Das Fluchlein, das Jeder mitbekam
Please answer a question about the following table 

header: Opus | Title | Subdivisions | Compo-sition | Premiere date | Place, theatre row 1 : 1 | Der Barenhauter | 3 acts | 1898 | 22 January 1899 | Munich, Hofopera
row 2 : 2 | Herzog Wildfang | 3 acts | 1900 | 23 March 1901 | Munich, Hofopera
row 3 : 3 | Der Kobold | 3 acts | 1903 | 29 January 1904 | Hamburg, Stadttheater
row 4 : 4 | Bruder Lustig | 3 acts | 1904 | 13 October 1905 | Hamburg, Stadttheater
row 5 : 5 | Sternengebot | prologue and 3 acts | 1906 | 21 January 1908 | Hamburg, Stadttheater
row 6 : 6 | Banadietrich | 3 acts | 1909 | 23 January 1910 | Karlsruhe, Hoftheater
row 7 : 7 | Schwarzschwanenreich | 3 acts | 1910 | 5 November 1918 | Karlsruhe, Hoftheater
row 8 : 8 | Sonnenflammen | 3 acts | 1912 | 30 October 1918 | Darmstadt, Hoftheater
row 9 : 9 | Der Heidenkonig | prologue and 3 acts | 1913 | 16 December 1933 | Cologne, Stadtische Buhnen
row 10 : 10 | Der Friedensengel | 3 acts | 1914 | 4 March 1926 | Karlsruhe, Badisches Landestheater
row 11 : 11 | An allem ist Hutchen Schuld! | 3 acts | 1915 | 6 December 1917 | Stuttgart, Hofopera
row 12 : 12a | Das Liebesopfer (libret | 4 acts | 1917 | nan | nan
row 13 : 13 | Der Schmied von Marienburg | 3 acts | 1920 | 16 December 1920 | Rostock, Stadtische Buhnen
row 14 : 14 | Rainulf und Adelasia | 3 acts | 1922 | 1923 | Rostock (prelude only)
row 15 : 15 | Die heilige Linde | 3 acts | 1927 | 2001 | Keulen (prelude only)
row 16 : 16 | Wahnopfer | 3 acts | 1928 | 1994 | Rudolstadt, Heidecksburg only
row 17 : 17 | Walamund (libretto only, | 3 acts | 1928 | nan | nan
row 18 : 18 | Das Fluchlein, das Jeder mitbekam | 3 acts | 1929 | 29 April 1984 | Kiel (completed by Hans Peter Mohr

what are all of the titles? how many acts did each have?

Answer: 3 acts, 3 acts, 3 acts, 3 acts, prologue and 3 acts, 3 acts, 3 acts, 3 acts, prologue and 3 acts, 3 acts, 3 acts, 4 acts, 3 acts, 3 acts, 3 acts, 3 acts, 3 acts, 3 acts
Please answer a question about the following table 

header: Opus | Title | Subdivisions | Compo-sition | Premiere date | Place, theatre row 1 : 1 | Der Barenhauter | 3 acts | 1898 | 22 January 1899 | Munich, Hofopera
row 2 : 2 | Herzog Wildfang | 3 acts | 1900 | 23 March 1901 | Munich, Hofopera
row 3 : 3 | Der Kobold | 3 acts | 1903 | 29 January 1904 | Hamburg, Stadttheater
row 4 : 4 | Bruder Lustig | 3 acts | 1904 | 13 October 1905 | Hamburg, Stadttheater
row 5 : 5 | Sternengebot | prologue and 3 acts | 1906 | 21 January 1908 | Hamburg, Stadttheater
row 6 : 6 | Banadietrich | 3 acts | 1909 | 23 January 1910 | Karlsruhe, Hoftheater
row 7 : 7 | Schwarzschwanenreich | 3 acts | 1910 | 5 November 1918 | Karlsruhe, Hoftheater
row 8 : 8 | Sonnenflammen | 3 acts | 1912 | 30 October 1918 | Darmstadt, Hoftheater
row 9 : 9 | Der Heidenkonig | prologue and 3 acts | 1913 | 16 December 1933 | Cologne, Stadtische Buhnen
row 10 : 10 | Der Friedensengel | 3 acts | 1914 | 4 March 1926 | Karlsruhe, Badisches Landestheater
row 11 : 11 | An allem ist Hutchen Schuld! | 3 acts | 1915 | 6 December 1917 | Stuttgart, Hofopera
row 12 : 12a | Das Liebesopfer (libret | 4 acts | 1917 | nan | nan
row 13 : 13 | Der Schmied von Marienburg | 3 acts | 1920 | 16 December 1920 | Rostock, Stadtische Buhnen
row 14 : 14 | Rainulf und Adelasia | 3 acts | 1922 | 1923 | Rostock (prelude only)
row 15 : 15 | Die heilige Linde | 3 acts | 1927 | 2001 | Keulen (prelude only)
row 16 : 16 | Wahnopfer | 3 acts | 1928 | 1994 | Rudolstadt, Heidecksburg only
row 17 : 17 | Walamund (libretto only, | 3 acts | 1928 | nan | nan
row 18 : 18 | Das Fluchlein, das Jeder mitbekam | 3 acts | 1929 | 29 April 1984 | Kiel (completed by Hans Peter Mohr

what are all of the titles? how many acts did each have? what about just das liebesopfer (libretto only, no music completed) and an allem ist hutchen schuld!?

Answer: 3 acts, 4 acts
Please answer a question about the following table 

header: Opus | Title | Subdivisions | Compo-sition | Premiere date | Place, theatre row 1 : 1 | Der Barenhauter | 3 acts | 1898 | 22 January 1899 | Munich, Hofopera
row 2 : 2 | Herzog Wildfang | 3 acts | 1900 | 23 March 1901 | Munich, Hofopera
row 3 : 3 | Der Kobold | 3 acts | 1903 | 29 January 1904 | Hamburg, Stadttheater
row 4 : 4 | Bruder Lustig | 3 acts | 1904 | 13 October 1905 | Hamburg, Stadttheater
row 5 : 5 | Sternengebot | prologue and 3 acts | 1906 | 21 January 1908 | Hamburg, Stadttheater
row 6 : 6 | Banadietrich | 3 acts | 1909 | 23 January 1910 | Karlsruhe, Hoftheater
row 7 : 7 | Schwarzschwanenreich | 3 acts | 1910 | 5 November 1918 | Karlsruhe, Hoftheater
row 8 : 8 | Sonnenflammen | 3 acts | 1912 | 30 October 1918 | Darmstadt, Hoftheater
row 9 : 9 | Der Heidenkonig | prologue and 3 acts | 1913 | 16 December 1933 | Cologne, Stadtische Buhnen
row 10 : 10 | Der Friedensengel | 3 acts | 1914 | 4 March 1926 | Karlsruhe, Badisches Landestheater
row 11 : 11 | An allem ist Hutchen Schuld! | 3 acts | 1915 | 6 December 1917 | Stuttgart, Hofopera
row 12 : 12a | Das Liebesopfer (libret | 4 acts | 1917 | nan | nan
row 13 : 13 | Der Schmied von Marienburg | 3 acts | 1920 | 16 December 1920 | Rostock, Stadtische Buhnen
row 14 : 14 | Rainulf und Adelasia | 3 acts | 1922 | 1923 | Rostock (prelude only)
row 15 : 15 | Die heilige Linde | 3 acts | 1927 | 2001 | Keulen (prelude only)
row 16 : 16 | Wahnopfer | 3 acts | 1928 | 1994 | Rudolstadt, Heidecksburg only
row 17 : 17 | Walamund (libretto only, | 3 acts | 1928 | nan | nan
row 18 : 18 | Das Fluchlein, das Jeder mitbekam | 3 acts | 1929 | 29 April 1984 | Kiel (completed by Hans Peter Mohr

what are all of the titles? how many acts did each have? what about just das liebesopfer (libretto only, no music completed) and an allem ist hutchen schuld!? which had more?

Answer: Das Liebesopfer (libretto only, no music completed)
Please answer a question about the following table 

header: Name | Type | R.A. (J2000) | Dec. (J2000) | Redshift (km/s) | Apparent Magnitude row 1 : Camelopardalis A | Irr | 04h 26m 16.3s | +72deg 48' 21'' | -46 +- 1 | 14.8
row 2 : Camelopardalis B | Irr | 04h 53m 07.1s | +67deg 05' 57' | 77 | 16.1
row 3 : Cassiopeia 1 | dIrr | 02h 06m 02.8s | +68deg 59' 59' | 35 | 16.4
row 4 : IC 342 | SAB(rs)cd | 03h 46m 48.5s | +68deg 05' 46'' | 31 +- 3 | 9.1
row 5 : KK 35 | Irr | 03h 45m 12.6s | +67deg 51' 51'' | 105 +- 1 | 17.2
row 6 : NGC 1560 | SA(s)d | 04h 32m 49.1s | +71deg 52' 59'' | -36 +- 5 | 12.2
row 7 : NGC 1569 | Sbrst | 04h 30m 49.1s | +64deg 50' 52,6' | -104 +- 4 | 11,2
row 8 : UGCA 86 | Im | 03h 59m 50.5s | +67deg 08' 37'' | 67 +- 4 | 13.5
row 9 : UGCA 92 | Im | 04h 32m 04.9s | +63deg 36' 49.0' | -99 +- 5 | 13.8
row 10 : UGCA 105 | Im | 05h 14m 15.3s | +62deg 34' 48'' | 111 +- 5 | 13.9

what are all of the group names? what is their redshift rating?

Answer: -46 +- 1, 77, 35, 31 +- 3, 105 +- 1, -36 +- 5, -104 +- 4, 67 +- 4, -99 +- 5, 111 +- 5
Please answer a question about the following table 

header: Name | Type | R.A. (J2000) | Dec. (J2000) | Redshift (km/s) | Apparent Magnitude row 1 : Camelopardalis A | Irr | 04h 26m 16.3s | +72deg 48' 21'' | -46 +- 1 | 14.8
row 2 : Camelopardalis B | Irr | 04h 53m 07.1s | +67deg 05' 57' | 77 | 16.1
row 3 : Cassiopeia 1 | dIrr | 02h 06m 02.8s | +68deg 59' 59' | 35 | 16.4
row 4 : IC 342 | SAB(rs)cd | 03h 46m 48.5s | +68deg 05' 46'' | 31 +- 3 | 9.1
row 5 : KK 35 | Irr | 03h 45m 12.6s | +67deg 51' 51'' | 105 +- 1 | 17.2
row 6 : NGC 1560 | SA(s)d | 04h 32m 49.1s | +71deg 52' 59'' | -36 +- 5 | 12.2
row 7 : NGC 1569 | Sbrst | 04h 30m 49.1s | +64deg 50' 52,6' | -104 +- 4 | 11,2
row 8 : UGCA 86 | Im | 03h 59m 50.5s | +67deg 08' 37'' | 67 +- 4 | 13.5
row 9 : UGCA 92 | Im | 04h 32m 04.9s | +63deg 36' 49.0' | -99 +- 5 | 13.8
row 10 : UGCA 105 | Im | 05h 14m 15.3s | +62deg 34' 48'' | 111 +- 5 | 13.9

what are all of the group names? what is their redshift rating? and which has the highest redshift rating?

Answer: UGCA 105
Please answer a question about the following table 

header: Name | Type | R.A. (J2000) | Dec. (J2000) | Redshift (km/s) | Apparent Magnitude row 1 : Camelopardalis A | Irr | 04h 26m 16.3s | +72deg 48' 21'' | -46 +- 1 | 14.8
row 2 : Camelopardalis B | Irr | 04h 53m 07.1s | +67deg 05' 57' | 77 | 16.1
row 3 : Cassiopeia 1 | dIrr | 02h 06m 02.8s | +68deg 59' 59' | 35 | 16.4
row 4 : IC 342 | SAB(rs)cd | 03h 46m 48.5s | +68deg 05' 46'' | 31 +- 3 | 9.1
row 5 : KK 35 | Irr | 03h 45m 12.6s | +67deg 51' 51'' | 105 +- 1 | 17.2
row 6 : NGC 1560 | SA(s)d | 04h 32m 49.1s | +71deg 52' 59'' | -36 +- 5 | 12.2
row 7 : NGC 1569 | Sbrst | 04h 30m 49.1s | +64deg 50' 52,6' | -104 +- 4 | 11,2
row 8 : UGCA 86 | Im | 03h 59m 50.5s | +67deg 08' 37'' | 67 +- 4 | 13.5
row 9 : UGCA 92 | Im | 04h 32m 04.9s | +63deg 36' 49.0' | -99 +- 5 | 13.8
row 10 : UGCA 105 | Im | 05h 14m 15.3s | +62deg 34' 48'' | 111 +- 5 | 13.9

what is the amount of redshift of each individual?

Answer: -46 +- 1, 77, 35, 31 +- 3, 105 +- 1, -36 +- 5, -104 +- 4, 67 +- 4, -99 +- 5, 111 +- 5
Please answer a question about the following table 

header: Name | Type | R.A. (J2000) | Dec. (J2000) | Redshift (km/s) | Apparent Magnitude row 1 : Camelopardalis A | Irr | 04h 26m 16.3s | +72deg 48' 21'' | -46 +- 1 | 14.8
row 2 : Camelopardalis B | Irr | 04h 53m 07.1s | +67deg 05' 57' | 77 | 16.1
row 3 : Cassiopeia 1 | dIrr | 02h 06m 02.8s | +68deg 59' 59' | 35 | 16.4
row 4 : IC 342 | SAB(rs)cd | 03h 46m 48.5s | +68deg 05' 46'' | 31 +- 3 | 9.1
row 5 : KK 35 | Irr | 03h 45m 12.6s | +67deg 51' 51'' | 105 +- 1 | 17.2
row 6 : NGC 1560 | SA(s)d | 04h 32m 49.1s | +71deg 52' 59'' | -36 +- 5 | 12.2
row 7 : NGC 1569 | Sbrst | 04h 30m 49.1s | +64deg 50' 52,6' | -104 +- 4 | 11,2
row 8 : UGCA 86 | Im | 03h 59m 50.5s | +67deg 08' 37'' | 67 +- 4 | 13.5
row 9 : UGCA 92 | Im | 04h 32m 04.9s | +63deg 36' 49.0' | -99 +- 5 | 13.8
row 10 : UGCA 105 | Im | 05h 14m 15.3s | +62deg 34' 48'' | 111 +- 5 | 13.9

what is the amount of redshift of each individual? what is the greatest amount of redshift?

Answer: 111 +- 5
Please answer a question about the following table 

header: Name | Type | R.A. (J2000) | Dec. (J2000) | Redshift (km/s) | Apparent Magnitude row 1 : Camelopardalis A | Irr | 04h 26m 16.3s | +72deg 48' 21'' | -46 +- 1 | 14.8
row 2 : Camelopardalis B | Irr | 04h 53m 07.1s | +67deg 05' 57' | 77 | 16.1
row 3 : Cassiopeia 1 | dIrr | 02h 06m 02.8s | +68deg 59' 59' | 35 | 16.4
row 4 : IC 342 | SAB(rs)cd | 03h 46m 48.5s | +68deg 05' 46'' | 31 +- 3 | 9.1
row 5 : KK 35 | Irr | 03h 45m 12.6s | +67deg 51' 51'' | 105 +- 1 | 17.2
row 6 : NGC 1560 | SA(s)d | 04h 32m 49.1s | +71deg 52' 59'' | -36 +- 5 | 12.2
row 7 : NGC 1569 | Sbrst | 04h 30m 49.1s | +64deg 50' 52,6' | -104 +- 4 | 11,2
row 8 : UGCA 86 | Im | 03h 59m 50.5s | +67deg 08' 37'' | 67 +- 4 | 13.5
row 9 : UGCA 92 | Im | 04h 32m 04.9s | +63deg 36' 49.0' | -99 +- 5 | 13.8
row 10 : UGCA 105 | Im | 05h 14m 15.3s | +62deg 34' 48'' | 111 +- 5 | 13.9

what is the amount of redshift of each individual? what is the greatest amount of redshift? which has this redshift?

Answer: UGCA 105
Please answer a question about the following table 

header: Name | Type | R.A. (J2000) | Dec. (J2000) | Redshift (km/s) | Apparent Magnitude row 1 : Camelopardalis A | Irr | 04h 26m 16.3s | +72deg 48' 21'' | -46 +- 1 | 14.8
row 2 : Camelopardalis B | Irr | 04h 53m 07.1s | +67deg 05' 57' | 77 | 16.1
row 3 : Cassiopeia 1 | dIrr | 02h 06m 02.8s | +68deg 59' 59' | 35 | 16.4
row 4 : IC 342 | SAB(rs)cd | 03h 46m 48.5s | +68deg 05' 46'' | 31 +- 3 | 9.1
row 5 : KK 35 | Irr | 03h 45m 12.6s | +67deg 51' 51'' | 105 +- 1 | 17.2
row 6 : NGC 1560 | SA(s)d | 04h 32m 49.1s | +71deg 52' 59'' | -36 +- 5 | 12.2
row 7 : NGC 1569 | Sbrst | 04h 30m 49.1s | +64deg 50' 52,6' | -104 +- 4 | 11,2
row 8 : UGCA 86 | Im | 03h 59m 50.5s | +67deg 08' 37'' | 67 +- 4 | 13.5
row 9 : UGCA 92 | Im | 04h 32m 04.9s | +63deg 36' 49.0' | -99 +- 5 | 13.8
row 10 : UGCA 105 | Im | 05h 14m 15.3s | +62deg 34' 48'' | 111 +- 5 | 13.9

what are the galaxies in the ic 342/maffei group?

Answer: Camelopardalis A, Camelopardalis B, Cassiopeia 1, IC 342, KK 35, NGC 1560, NGC 1569, UGCA 86, UGCA 92, UGCA 105
Please answer a question about the following table 

header: Name | Type | R.A. (J2000) | Dec. (J2000) | Redshift (km/s) | Apparent Magnitude row 1 : Camelopardalis A | Irr | 04h 26m 16.3s | +72deg 48' 21'' | -46 +- 1 | 14.8
row 2 : Camelopardalis B | Irr | 04h 53m 07.1s | +67deg 05' 57' | 77 | 16.1
row 3 : Cassiopeia 1 | dIrr | 02h 06m 02.8s | +68deg 59' 59' | 35 | 16.4
row 4 : IC 342 | SAB(rs)cd | 03h 46m 48.5s | +68deg 05' 46'' | 31 +- 3 | 9.1
row 5 : KK 35 | Irr | 03h 45m 12.6s | +67deg 51' 51'' | 105 +- 1 | 17.2
row 6 : NGC 1560 | SA(s)d | 04h 32m 49.1s | +71deg 52' 59'' | -36 +- 5 | 12.2
row 7 : NGC 1569 | Sbrst | 04h 30m 49.1s | +64deg 50' 52,6' | -104 +- 4 | 11,2
row 8 : UGCA 86 | Im | 03h 59m 50.5s | +67deg 08' 37'' | 67 +- 4 | 13.5
row 9 : UGCA 92 | Im | 04h 32m 04.9s | +63deg 36' 49.0' | -99 +- 5 | 13.8
row 10 : UGCA 105 | Im | 05h 14m 15.3s | +62deg 34' 48'' | 111 +- 5 | 13.9

what are the galaxies in the ic 342/maffei group? which of these has the most redshft?

Answer: UGCA 105
Please answer a question about the following table 

header: Polling Firm | Source | Date Published | N.Anastasiades | G.Lillikas | S.Malas | Others row 1 : RAI Consultants | [1][dead link] | 16 September 2012 | 37.2% | 14.2% | 21.9% | 1.5%
row 2 : Evresis | [2] | 18 September 2012 | 35.2% | 17.5% | 19.7% | 1.7%
row 3 : Noverna | [3] | 23 September 2012 | 35.02% | 15.81% | 17.78% | nan
row 4 : Prime Consulting Ltd | [4] | 7 October 2012 | 34.7% | 17.4% | 18.5% | nan
row 5 : CMR Cypronetwork / Cyb | [5][dead link] | 18 October 2012 | 36.9% | 17% | 23.8% | 1.2%
row 6 : Evresis | [6] | 2 November 2012 | 36.9% | 17.7% | 20.6% | 1.4%
row 7 : RAI Consultants | [7] | 4 November 2012 | 38.8% | 19.8% | 21.1% | 2.3%
row 8 : CMR Cypronetwork / Cyb | [8] | 15 November 2012 | 36.8% | 18.9% | 22.8% | 1.6%
row 9 : Prime Consulting Ltd | [9] | 18 November 2012 | 35.9% | 18.7% | 19.6% | 0.6%
row 10 : Evresis | [10] | 27 November 2012 | 37.1% | 19.6% | 20.8% | 0.6%
row 11 : Noverna | [11] | 2 December 2012 | 35.6% | 17.2% | 18.1% | 4.1%
row 12 : Prime Consulting Ltd | [12] | 3 December 2012 | 35% | 19.1% | 18.6% | 1.4%
row 13 : CMR Cypronetwork / Cyb | [13][dead link] | 17 December 2012 | 37.1% | 20.4% | 23.1% | 3.1%
row 14 : Evresis | [14] | 22 December 2012 | 37.4% | 19.8% | 21.8% | 0.5%
row 15 : RAI Consultants Ltd | [15][dead link] | 13 January 2013 | 40.3% | 17.9% | 20.5% | 6.1%
row 16 : CMR Cypronetwork / Cyb | [16] | 17 January 2013 | 38% | 19.7% | 23.7% | 2.7%
row 17 : Prime Consulting Ltd | [17] | 27 January 2013 | 39.2% | 18.8% | 19.8% | 4%
row 18 : Evresis | [18] | 1 February 2013 | 40.8% | 19.9% | 22.2% | 2.5%
row 19 : Prime Consulting Ltd | [19] | 4 February 2013 | 39.8% | 19.3% | 20% | 3%
row 20 : Prime Consulting Ltd | [20] | 9 February 2013 | 40.6% | 19.6% | 20.4% | 2.9%
row 21 : RAI Consultants Ltd | [21] | 9 February 2013 | 42.1% | 19.4% | 21.1% | 4.4%
row 22 : CMR Cypronetwork / Cyb | [22] | 9 February 2013 | 39.9% | 20.2% | 24.2% | 3%
row 23 : Average (only valid votes) | - | - | 48.4% | 22.52% | 25.29% | 3.79%

what are all the polling firms?

Answer: RAI Consultants, Evresis, Noverna, Prime Consulting Ltd, CMR Cypronetwork / Cybc, RAI Consultants Ltd
Please answer a question about the following table 

header: Polling Firm | Source | Date Published | N.Anastasiades | G.Lillikas | S.Malas | Others row 1 : RAI Consultants | [1][dead link] | 16 September 2012 | 37.2% | 14.2% | 21.9% | 1.5%
row 2 : Evresis | [2] | 18 September 2012 | 35.2% | 17.5% | 19.7% | 1.7%
row 3 : Noverna | [3] | 23 September 2012 | 35.02% | 15.81% | 17.78% | nan
row 4 : Prime Consulting Ltd | [4] | 7 October 2012 | 34.7% | 17.4% | 18.5% | nan
row 5 : CMR Cypronetwork / Cyb | [5][dead link] | 18 October 2012 | 36.9% | 17% | 23.8% | 1.2%
row 6 : Evresis | [6] | 2 November 2012 | 36.9% | 17.7% | 20.6% | 1.4%
row 7 : RAI Consultants | [7] | 4 November 2012 | 38.8% | 19.8% | 21.1% | 2.3%
row 8 : CMR Cypronetwork / Cyb | [8] | 15 November 2012 | 36.8% | 18.9% | 22.8% | 1.6%
row 9 : Prime Consulting Ltd | [9] | 18 November 2012 | 35.9% | 18.7% | 19.6% | 0.6%
row 10 : Evresis | [10] | 27 November 2012 | 37.1% | 19.6% | 20.8% | 0.6%
row 11 : Noverna | [11] | 2 December 2012 | 35.6% | 17.2% | 18.1% | 4.1%
row 12 : Prime Consulting Ltd | [12] | 3 December 2012 | 35% | 19.1% | 18.6% | 1.4%
row 13 : CMR Cypronetwork / Cyb | [13][dead link] | 17 December 2012 | 37.1% | 20.4% | 23.1% | 3.1%
row 14 : Evresis | [14] | 22 December 2012 | 37.4% | 19.8% | 21.8% | 0.5%
row 15 : RAI Consultants Ltd | [15][dead link] | 13 January 2013 | 40.3% | 17.9% | 20.5% | 6.1%
row 16 : CMR Cypronetwork / Cyb | [16] | 17 January 2013 | 38% | 19.7% | 23.7% | 2.7%
row 17 : Prime Consulting Ltd | [17] | 27 January 2013 | 39.2% | 18.8% | 19.8% | 4%
row 18 : Evresis | [18] | 1 February 2013 | 40.8% | 19.9% | 22.2% | 2.5%
row 19 : Prime Consulting Ltd | [19] | 4 February 2013 | 39.8% | 19.3% | 20% | 3%
row 20 : Prime Consulting Ltd | [20] | 9 February 2013 | 40.6% | 19.6% | 20.4% | 2.9%
row 21 : RAI Consultants Ltd | [21] | 9 February 2013 | 42.1% | 19.4% | 21.1% | 4.4%
row 22 : CMR Cypronetwork / Cyb | [22] | 9 February 2013 | 39.9% | 20.2% | 24.2% | 3%
row 23 : Average (only valid votes) | - | - | 48.4% | 22.52% | 25.29% | 3.79%

what are all the polling firms? which of these published in february 2013?

Answer: Evresis, Prime Consulting Ltd, RAI Consultants Ltd, CMR Cypronetwork / Cybc
Please answer a question about the following table 

header: Polling Firm | Source | Date Published | N.Anastasiades | G.Lillikas | S.Malas | Others row 1 : RAI Consultants | [1][dead link] | 16 September 2012 | 37.2% | 14.2% | 21.9% | 1.5%
row 2 : Evresis | [2] | 18 September 2012 | 35.2% | 17.5% | 19.7% | 1.7%
row 3 : Noverna | [3] | 23 September 2012 | 35.02% | 15.81% | 17.78% | nan
row 4 : Prime Consulting Ltd | [4] | 7 October 2012 | 34.7% | 17.4% | 18.5% | nan
row 5 : CMR Cypronetwork / Cyb | [5][dead link] | 18 October 2012 | 36.9% | 17% | 23.8% | 1.2%
row 6 : Evresis | [6] | 2 November 2012 | 36.9% | 17.7% | 20.6% | 1.4%
row 7 : RAI Consultants | [7] | 4 November 2012 | 38.8% | 19.8% | 21.1% | 2.3%
row 8 : CMR Cypronetwork / Cyb | [8] | 15 November 2012 | 36.8% | 18.9% | 22.8% | 1.6%
row 9 : Prime Consulting Ltd | [9] | 18 November 2012 | 35.9% | 18.7% | 19.6% | 0.6%
row 10 : Evresis | [10] | 27 November 2012 | 37.1% | 19.6% | 20.8% | 0.6%
row 11 : Noverna | [11] | 2 December 2012 | 35.6% | 17.2% | 18.1% | 4.1%
row 12 : Prime Consulting Ltd | [12] | 3 December 2012 | 35% | 19.1% | 18.6% | 1.4%
row 13 : CMR Cypronetwork / Cyb | [13][dead link] | 17 December 2012 | 37.1% | 20.4% | 23.1% | 3.1%
row 14 : Evresis | [14] | 22 December 2012 | 37.4% | 19.8% | 21.8% | 0.5%
row 15 : RAI Consultants Ltd | [15][dead link] | 13 January 2013 | 40.3% | 17.9% | 20.5% | 6.1%
row 16 : CMR Cypronetwork / Cyb | [16] | 17 January 2013 | 38% | 19.7% | 23.7% | 2.7%
row 17 : Prime Consulting Ltd | [17] | 27 January 2013 | 39.2% | 18.8% | 19.8% | 4%
row 18 : Evresis | [18] | 1 February 2013 | 40.8% | 19.9% | 22.2% | 2.5%
row 19 : Prime Consulting Ltd | [19] | 4 February 2013 | 39.8% | 19.3% | 20% | 3%
row 20 : Prime Consulting Ltd | [20] | 9 February 2013 | 40.6% | 19.6% | 20.4% | 2.9%
row 21 : RAI Consultants Ltd | [21] | 9 February 2013 | 42.1% | 19.4% | 21.1% | 4.4%
row 22 : CMR Cypronetwork / Cyb | [22] | 9 February 2013 | 39.9% | 20.2% | 24.2% | 3%
row 23 : Average (only valid votes) | - | - | 48.4% | 22.52% | 25.29% | 3.79%

what are all the polling firms? which of these published in february 2013? of these, which did not publish on february 9?

Answer: Evresis, Prime Consulting Ltd