sail/symbolic-instruction-tuning huggingface dataset:
Please answer a question about the following table 

header: Location | Reactor type | Status | Net Capacity (MWe) | Gross Capacity (MWe) row 1 : Chernobyl-1 | RBMK-1000 | shut down in 1996 | 740 | 800
row 2 : Chernobyl-2 | RBMK-1000 | shut down in 1991 | 925 | 1,000
row 3 : Chernobyl-3 | RBMK-1000 | shut down in 2000 | 925 | 1,000
row 4 : Chernobyl-4 | RBMK-1000 | destroyed in the 1986 accident | 925 | 1,000
row 5 : Chernobyl-5 | RBMK-1000 | construction cancelled in 1988 | 950 | 1,000
row 6 : Chernobyl-6 | RBMK-1000 | construction cancelled in 1988 | 950 | 1,000
row 7 : Ignalina-1 | RBMK-1500 | shut down in 2004 | 1,185 | 1,300
row 8 : Ignalina-2 | RBMK-1500 | shut down in 2009 | 1,185 | 1,300
row 9 : Ignalina-3 | RBMK-1500 | construction cancelled in 1988 | 1,380 | 1,500
row 10 : Ignalina-4 | RBMK-1500 | plan cancelled in 1988 | 1,380 | 1,500
row 11 : Kostroma-1 | RBMK-1500 | construction cancelled in 1980s | 1,380 | 1,500
row 12 : Kostroma-2 | RBMK-1500 | construction cancelled in 1980s | 1,380 | 1,500
row 13 : Kursk-1 | RBMK-1000 | operational until 2021 | 925 | 1,000
row 14 : Kursk-2 | RBMK-1000 | operational until 2024 | 925 | 1,000
row 15 : Kursk-3 | RBMK-1000 | operational until March 2014 | 925 | 1,000
row 16 : Kursk-4 | RBMK-1000 | operational until February 2016 | 925 | 1,000
row 17 : Kursk-5 | MKER-1000 | construction begin was 1985, since then shelve | 925 | 1,000
row 18 : Kursk-6 | RBMK-1000 | construction cancelled in 1993 | 925 | 1,000
row 19 : Leningrad-1 | RBMK-1000 | operational | 925 | 1,000
row 20 : Leningrad-2 | RBMK-1000 | operational until 2021 | 925 | 1,000
row 21 : Leningrad-3 | RBMK-1000 | operational until June 2025 | 925 | 1,000
row 22 : Leningrad-4 | RBMK-1000 | operational until August 2026 | 925 | 1,000
row 23 : Smolensk-1 | RBMK-1000 | operational until December 2022 | 925 | 1,000
row 24 : Smolensk-2 | RBMK-1000 | operational until July 2015 | 925 | 1,000
row 25 : Smolensk-3 | RBMK-1000 | operational until July 2023 | 925 | 1,000
row 26 : Smolensk-4 | RBMK-1000 | construction cancelled in 1993 | 925 | 1,000

what are the locations of the rbmk reactors?

Answer: Chernobyl-1, Chernobyl-2, Chernobyl-3, Chernobyl-4, Chernobyl-5, Chernobyl-6, Ignalina-1, Ignalina-2, Ignalina-3, Ignalina-4, Kostroma-1, Kostroma-2, Kursk-1, Kursk-2, Kursk-3, Kursk-4, Kursk-5, Kursk-6, Leningrad-1, Leningrad-2, Leningrad-3, Leningrad-4, Smolensk-1, Smolensk-2, Smolensk-3, Smolensk-4
Please answer a question about the following table 

header: Location | Reactor type | Status | Net Capacity (MWe) | Gross Capacity (MWe) row 1 : Chernobyl-1 | RBMK-1000 | shut down in 1996 | 740 | 800
row 2 : Chernobyl-2 | RBMK-1000 | shut down in 1991 | 925 | 1,000
row 3 : Chernobyl-3 | RBMK-1000 | shut down in 2000 | 925 | 1,000
row 4 : Chernobyl-4 | RBMK-1000 | destroyed in the 1986 accident | 925 | 1,000
row 5 : Chernobyl-5 | RBMK-1000 | construction cancelled in 1988 | 950 | 1,000
row 6 : Chernobyl-6 | RBMK-1000 | construction cancelled in 1988 | 950 | 1,000
row 7 : Ignalina-1 | RBMK-1500 | shut down in 2004 | 1,185 | 1,300
row 8 : Ignalina-2 | RBMK-1500 | shut down in 2009 | 1,185 | 1,300
row 9 : Ignalina-3 | RBMK-1500 | construction cancelled in 1988 | 1,380 | 1,500
row 10 : Ignalina-4 | RBMK-1500 | plan cancelled in 1988 | 1,380 | 1,500
row 11 : Kostroma-1 | RBMK-1500 | construction cancelled in 1980s | 1,380 | 1,500
row 12 : Kostroma-2 | RBMK-1500 | construction cancelled in 1980s | 1,380 | 1,500
row 13 : Kursk-1 | RBMK-1000 | operational until 2021 | 925 | 1,000
row 14 : Kursk-2 | RBMK-1000 | operational until 2024 | 925 | 1,000
row 15 : Kursk-3 | RBMK-1000 | operational until March 2014 | 925 | 1,000
row 16 : Kursk-4 | RBMK-1000 | operational until February 2016 | 925 | 1,000
row 17 : Kursk-5 | MKER-1000 | construction begin was 1985, since then shelve | 925 | 1,000
row 18 : Kursk-6 | RBMK-1000 | construction cancelled in 1993 | 925 | 1,000
row 19 : Leningrad-1 | RBMK-1000 | operational | 925 | 1,000
row 20 : Leningrad-2 | RBMK-1000 | operational until 2021 | 925 | 1,000
row 21 : Leningrad-3 | RBMK-1000 | operational until June 2025 | 925 | 1,000
row 22 : Leningrad-4 | RBMK-1000 | operational until August 2026 | 925 | 1,000
row 23 : Smolensk-1 | RBMK-1000 | operational until December 2022 | 925 | 1,000
row 24 : Smolensk-2 | RBMK-1000 | operational until July 2015 | 925 | 1,000
row 25 : Smolensk-3 | RBMK-1000 | operational until July 2023 | 925 | 1,000
row 26 : Smolensk-4 | RBMK-1000 | construction cancelled in 1993 | 925 | 1,000

what are the locations of the rbmk reactors? which of those has the rbmk-1000

Answer: Chernobyl-1, Chernobyl-2, Chernobyl-3, Chernobyl-4, Chernobyl-5, Chernobyl-6, Kursk-1, Kursk-2, Kursk-3, Kursk-4, Kursk-6, Leningrad-1, Leningrad-2, Leningrad-3, Leningrad-4, Smolensk-1, Smolensk-2, Smolensk-3, Smolensk-4
Please answer a question about the following table 

header: Location | Reactor type | Status | Net Capacity (MWe) | Gross Capacity (MWe) row 1 : Chernobyl-1 | RBMK-1000 | shut down in 1996 | 740 | 800
row 2 : Chernobyl-2 | RBMK-1000 | shut down in 1991 | 925 | 1,000
row 3 : Chernobyl-3 | RBMK-1000 | shut down in 2000 | 925 | 1,000
row 4 : Chernobyl-4 | RBMK-1000 | destroyed in the 1986 accident | 925 | 1,000
row 5 : Chernobyl-5 | RBMK-1000 | construction cancelled in 1988 | 950 | 1,000
row 6 : Chernobyl-6 | RBMK-1000 | construction cancelled in 1988 | 950 | 1,000
row 7 : Ignalina-1 | RBMK-1500 | shut down in 2004 | 1,185 | 1,300
row 8 : Ignalina-2 | RBMK-1500 | shut down in 2009 | 1,185 | 1,300
row 9 : Ignalina-3 | RBMK-1500 | construction cancelled in 1988 | 1,380 | 1,500
row 10 : Ignalina-4 | RBMK-1500 | plan cancelled in 1988 | 1,380 | 1,500
row 11 : Kostroma-1 | RBMK-1500 | construction cancelled in 1980s | 1,380 | 1,500
row 12 : Kostroma-2 | RBMK-1500 | construction cancelled in 1980s | 1,380 | 1,500
row 13 : Kursk-1 | RBMK-1000 | operational until 2021 | 925 | 1,000
row 14 : Kursk-2 | RBMK-1000 | operational until 2024 | 925 | 1,000
row 15 : Kursk-3 | RBMK-1000 | operational until March 2014 | 925 | 1,000
row 16 : Kursk-4 | RBMK-1000 | operational until February 2016 | 925 | 1,000
row 17 : Kursk-5 | MKER-1000 | construction begin was 1985, since then shelve | 925 | 1,000
row 18 : Kursk-6 | RBMK-1000 | construction cancelled in 1993 | 925 | 1,000
row 19 : Leningrad-1 | RBMK-1000 | operational | 925 | 1,000
row 20 : Leningrad-2 | RBMK-1000 | operational until 2021 | 925 | 1,000
row 21 : Leningrad-3 | RBMK-1000 | operational until June 2025 | 925 | 1,000
row 22 : Leningrad-4 | RBMK-1000 | operational until August 2026 | 925 | 1,000
row 23 : Smolensk-1 | RBMK-1000 | operational until December 2022 | 925 | 1,000
row 24 : Smolensk-2 | RBMK-1000 | operational until July 2015 | 925 | 1,000
row 25 : Smolensk-3 | RBMK-1000 | operational until July 2023 | 925 | 1,000
row 26 : Smolensk-4 | RBMK-1000 | construction cancelled in 1993 | 925 | 1,000

what are the locations of the rbmk reactors? which of those has the rbmk-1000 which of those has been shut down?

Answer: Chernobyl-1, Chernobyl-2, Chernobyl-3
Please answer a question about the following table 

header: Location | Reactor type | Status | Net Capacity (MWe) | Gross Capacity (MWe) row 1 : Chernobyl-1 | RBMK-1000 | shut down in 1996 | 740 | 800
row 2 : Chernobyl-2 | RBMK-1000 | shut down in 1991 | 925 | 1,000
row 3 : Chernobyl-3 | RBMK-1000 | shut down in 2000 | 925 | 1,000
row 4 : Chernobyl-4 | RBMK-1000 | destroyed in the 1986 accident | 925 | 1,000
row 5 : Chernobyl-5 | RBMK-1000 | construction cancelled in 1988 | 950 | 1,000
row 6 : Chernobyl-6 | RBMK-1000 | construction cancelled in 1988 | 950 | 1,000
row 7 : Ignalina-1 | RBMK-1500 | shut down in 2004 | 1,185 | 1,300
row 8 : Ignalina-2 | RBMK-1500 | shut down in 2009 | 1,185 | 1,300
row 9 : Ignalina-3 | RBMK-1500 | construction cancelled in 1988 | 1,380 | 1,500
row 10 : Ignalina-4 | RBMK-1500 | plan cancelled in 1988 | 1,380 | 1,500
row 11 : Kostroma-1 | RBMK-1500 | construction cancelled in 1980s | 1,380 | 1,500
row 12 : Kostroma-2 | RBMK-1500 | construction cancelled in 1980s | 1,380 | 1,500
row 13 : Kursk-1 | RBMK-1000 | operational until 2021 | 925 | 1,000
row 14 : Kursk-2 | RBMK-1000 | operational until 2024 | 925 | 1,000
row 15 : Kursk-3 | RBMK-1000 | operational until March 2014 | 925 | 1,000
row 16 : Kursk-4 | RBMK-1000 | operational until February 2016 | 925 | 1,000
row 17 : Kursk-5 | MKER-1000 | construction begin was 1985, since then shelve | 925 | 1,000
row 18 : Kursk-6 | RBMK-1000 | construction cancelled in 1993 | 925 | 1,000
row 19 : Leningrad-1 | RBMK-1000 | operational | 925 | 1,000
row 20 : Leningrad-2 | RBMK-1000 | operational until 2021 | 925 | 1,000
row 21 : Leningrad-3 | RBMK-1000 | operational until June 2025 | 925 | 1,000
row 22 : Leningrad-4 | RBMK-1000 | operational until August 2026 | 925 | 1,000
row 23 : Smolensk-1 | RBMK-1000 | operational until December 2022 | 925 | 1,000
row 24 : Smolensk-2 | RBMK-1000 | operational until July 2015 | 925 | 1,000
row 25 : Smolensk-3 | RBMK-1000 | operational until July 2023 | 925 | 1,000
row 26 : Smolensk-4 | RBMK-1000 | construction cancelled in 1993 | 925 | 1,000

what are the locations of the rbmk reactors? which of those has the rbmk-1000 which of those has been shut down? which were shut down before 1999?

Answer: Chernobyl-1, Chernobyl-2
Please answer a question about the following table 

header: Location | Reactor type | Status | Net Capacity (MWe) | Gross Capacity (MWe) row 1 : Chernobyl-1 | RBMK-1000 | shut down in 1996 | 740 | 800
row 2 : Chernobyl-2 | RBMK-1000 | shut down in 1991 | 925 | 1,000
row 3 : Chernobyl-3 | RBMK-1000 | shut down in 2000 | 925 | 1,000
row 4 : Chernobyl-4 | RBMK-1000 | destroyed in the 1986 accident | 925 | 1,000
row 5 : Chernobyl-5 | RBMK-1000 | construction cancelled in 1988 | 950 | 1,000
row 6 : Chernobyl-6 | RBMK-1000 | construction cancelled in 1988 | 950 | 1,000
row 7 : Ignalina-1 | RBMK-1500 | shut down in 2004 | 1,185 | 1,300
row 8 : Ignalina-2 | RBMK-1500 | shut down in 2009 | 1,185 | 1,300
row 9 : Ignalina-3 | RBMK-1500 | construction cancelled in 1988 | 1,380 | 1,500
row 10 : Ignalina-4 | RBMK-1500 | plan cancelled in 1988 | 1,380 | 1,500
row 11 : Kostroma-1 | RBMK-1500 | construction cancelled in 1980s | 1,380 | 1,500
row 12 : Kostroma-2 | RBMK-1500 | construction cancelled in 1980s | 1,380 | 1,500
row 13 : Kursk-1 | RBMK-1000 | operational until 2021 | 925 | 1,000
row 14 : Kursk-2 | RBMK-1000 | operational until 2024 | 925 | 1,000
row 15 : Kursk-3 | RBMK-1000 | operational until March 2014 | 925 | 1,000
row 16 : Kursk-4 | RBMK-1000 | operational until February 2016 | 925 | 1,000
row 17 : Kursk-5 | MKER-1000 | construction begin was 1985, since then shelve | 925 | 1,000
row 18 : Kursk-6 | RBMK-1000 | construction cancelled in 1993 | 925 | 1,000
row 19 : Leningrad-1 | RBMK-1000 | operational | 925 | 1,000
row 20 : Leningrad-2 | RBMK-1000 | operational until 2021 | 925 | 1,000
row 21 : Leningrad-3 | RBMK-1000 | operational until June 2025 | 925 | 1,000
row 22 : Leningrad-4 | RBMK-1000 | operational until August 2026 | 925 | 1,000
row 23 : Smolensk-1 | RBMK-1000 | operational until December 2022 | 925 | 1,000
row 24 : Smolensk-2 | RBMK-1000 | operational until July 2015 | 925 | 1,000
row 25 : Smolensk-3 | RBMK-1000 | operational until July 2023 | 925 | 1,000
row 26 : Smolensk-4 | RBMK-1000 | construction cancelled in 1993 | 925 | 1,000

what are the locations of the rbmk reactors? which of those has the rbmk-1000 which of those has been shut down? which were shut down before 1999? which of those had more gross capacity?

Answer: Chernobyl-2
Please answer a question about the following table 

header: Location | Reactor type | Status | Net Capacity (MWe) | Gross Capacity (MWe) row 1 : Chernobyl-1 | RBMK-1000 | shut down in 1996 | 740 | 800
row 2 : Chernobyl-2 | RBMK-1000 | shut down in 1991 | 925 | 1,000
row 3 : Chernobyl-3 | RBMK-1000 | shut down in 2000 | 925 | 1,000
row 4 : Chernobyl-4 | RBMK-1000 | destroyed in the 1986 accident | 925 | 1,000
row 5 : Chernobyl-5 | RBMK-1000 | construction cancelled in 1988 | 950 | 1,000
row 6 : Chernobyl-6 | RBMK-1000 | construction cancelled in 1988 | 950 | 1,000
row 7 : Ignalina-1 | RBMK-1500 | shut down in 2004 | 1,185 | 1,300
row 8 : Ignalina-2 | RBMK-1500 | shut down in 2009 | 1,185 | 1,300
row 9 : Ignalina-3 | RBMK-1500 | construction cancelled in 1988 | 1,380 | 1,500
row 10 : Ignalina-4 | RBMK-1500 | plan cancelled in 1988 | 1,380 | 1,500
row 11 : Kostroma-1 | RBMK-1500 | construction cancelled in 1980s | 1,380 | 1,500
row 12 : Kostroma-2 | RBMK-1500 | construction cancelled in 1980s | 1,380 | 1,500
row 13 : Kursk-1 | RBMK-1000 | operational until 2021 | 925 | 1,000
row 14 : Kursk-2 | RBMK-1000 | operational until 2024 | 925 | 1,000
row 15 : Kursk-3 | RBMK-1000 | operational until March 2014 | 925 | 1,000
row 16 : Kursk-4 | RBMK-1000 | operational until February 2016 | 925 | 1,000
row 17 : Kursk-5 | MKER-1000 | construction begin was 1985, since then shelve | 925 | 1,000
row 18 : Kursk-6 | RBMK-1000 | construction cancelled in 1993 | 925 | 1,000
row 19 : Leningrad-1 | RBMK-1000 | operational | 925 | 1,000
row 20 : Leningrad-2 | RBMK-1000 | operational until 2021 | 925 | 1,000
row 21 : Leningrad-3 | RBMK-1000 | operational until June 2025 | 925 | 1,000
row 22 : Leningrad-4 | RBMK-1000 | operational until August 2026 | 925 | 1,000
row 23 : Smolensk-1 | RBMK-1000 | operational until December 2022 | 925 | 1,000
row 24 : Smolensk-2 | RBMK-1000 | operational until July 2015 | 925 | 1,000
row 25 : Smolensk-3 | RBMK-1000 | operational until July 2023 | 925 | 1,000
row 26 : Smolensk-4 | RBMK-1000 | construction cancelled in 1993 | 925 | 1,000

what was the chernobyl-1 net capacity?

Answer: 740
Please answer a question about the following table 

header: Location | Reactor type | Status | Net Capacity (MWe) | Gross Capacity (MWe) row 1 : Chernobyl-1 | RBMK-1000 | shut down in 1996 | 740 | 800
row 2 : Chernobyl-2 | RBMK-1000 | shut down in 1991 | 925 | 1,000
row 3 : Chernobyl-3 | RBMK-1000 | shut down in 2000 | 925 | 1,000
row 4 : Chernobyl-4 | RBMK-1000 | destroyed in the 1986 accident | 925 | 1,000
row 5 : Chernobyl-5 | RBMK-1000 | construction cancelled in 1988 | 950 | 1,000
row 6 : Chernobyl-6 | RBMK-1000 | construction cancelled in 1988 | 950 | 1,000
row 7 : Ignalina-1 | RBMK-1500 | shut down in 2004 | 1,185 | 1,300
row 8 : Ignalina-2 | RBMK-1500 | shut down in 2009 | 1,185 | 1,300
row 9 : Ignalina-3 | RBMK-1500 | construction cancelled in 1988 | 1,380 | 1,500
row 10 : Ignalina-4 | RBMK-1500 | plan cancelled in 1988 | 1,380 | 1,500
row 11 : Kostroma-1 | RBMK-1500 | construction cancelled in 1980s | 1,380 | 1,500
row 12 : Kostroma-2 | RBMK-1500 | construction cancelled in 1980s | 1,380 | 1,500
row 13 : Kursk-1 | RBMK-1000 | operational until 2021 | 925 | 1,000
row 14 : Kursk-2 | RBMK-1000 | operational until 2024 | 925 | 1,000
row 15 : Kursk-3 | RBMK-1000 | operational until March 2014 | 925 | 1,000
row 16 : Kursk-4 | RBMK-1000 | operational until February 2016 | 925 | 1,000
row 17 : Kursk-5 | MKER-1000 | construction begin was 1985, since then shelve | 925 | 1,000
row 18 : Kursk-6 | RBMK-1000 | construction cancelled in 1993 | 925 | 1,000
row 19 : Leningrad-1 | RBMK-1000 | operational | 925 | 1,000
row 20 : Leningrad-2 | RBMK-1000 | operational until 2021 | 925 | 1,000
row 21 : Leningrad-3 | RBMK-1000 | operational until June 2025 | 925 | 1,000
row 22 : Leningrad-4 | RBMK-1000 | operational until August 2026 | 925 | 1,000
row 23 : Smolensk-1 | RBMK-1000 | operational until December 2022 | 925 | 1,000
row 24 : Smolensk-2 | RBMK-1000 | operational until July 2015 | 925 | 1,000
row 25 : Smolensk-3 | RBMK-1000 | operational until July 2023 | 925 | 1,000
row 26 : Smolensk-4 | RBMK-1000 | construction cancelled in 1993 | 925 | 1,000

what was the chernobyl-1 net capacity? what was the chernobyl-2 net capacity?

Answer: 925
Please answer a question about the following table 

header: Location | Reactor type | Status | Net Capacity (MWe) | Gross Capacity (MWe) row 1 : Chernobyl-1 | RBMK-1000 | shut down in 1996 | 740 | 800
row 2 : Chernobyl-2 | RBMK-1000 | shut down in 1991 | 925 | 1,000
row 3 : Chernobyl-3 | RBMK-1000 | shut down in 2000 | 925 | 1,000
row 4 : Chernobyl-4 | RBMK-1000 | destroyed in the 1986 accident | 925 | 1,000
row 5 : Chernobyl-5 | RBMK-1000 | construction cancelled in 1988 | 950 | 1,000
row 6 : Chernobyl-6 | RBMK-1000 | construction cancelled in 1988 | 950 | 1,000
row 7 : Ignalina-1 | RBMK-1500 | shut down in 2004 | 1,185 | 1,300
row 8 : Ignalina-2 | RBMK-1500 | shut down in 2009 | 1,185 | 1,300
row 9 : Ignalina-3 | RBMK-1500 | construction cancelled in 1988 | 1,380 | 1,500
row 10 : Ignalina-4 | RBMK-1500 | plan cancelled in 1988 | 1,380 | 1,500
row 11 : Kostroma-1 | RBMK-1500 | construction cancelled in 1980s | 1,380 | 1,500
row 12 : Kostroma-2 | RBMK-1500 | construction cancelled in 1980s | 1,380 | 1,500
row 13 : Kursk-1 | RBMK-1000 | operational until 2021 | 925 | 1,000
row 14 : Kursk-2 | RBMK-1000 | operational until 2024 | 925 | 1,000
row 15 : Kursk-3 | RBMK-1000 | operational until March 2014 | 925 | 1,000
row 16 : Kursk-4 | RBMK-1000 | operational until February 2016 | 925 | 1,000
row 17 : Kursk-5 | MKER-1000 | construction begin was 1985, since then shelve | 925 | 1,000
row 18 : Kursk-6 | RBMK-1000 | construction cancelled in 1993 | 925 | 1,000
row 19 : Leningrad-1 | RBMK-1000 | operational | 925 | 1,000
row 20 : Leningrad-2 | RBMK-1000 | operational until 2021 | 925 | 1,000
row 21 : Leningrad-3 | RBMK-1000 | operational until June 2025 | 925 | 1,000
row 22 : Leningrad-4 | RBMK-1000 | operational until August 2026 | 925 | 1,000
row 23 : Smolensk-1 | RBMK-1000 | operational until December 2022 | 925 | 1,000
row 24 : Smolensk-2 | RBMK-1000 | operational until July 2015 | 925 | 1,000
row 25 : Smolensk-3 | RBMK-1000 | operational until July 2023 | 925 | 1,000
row 26 : Smolensk-4 | RBMK-1000 | construction cancelled in 1993 | 925 | 1,000

what was the chernobyl-1 net capacity? what was the chernobyl-2 net capacity? which one of these has a higher capacity?

Answer: Chernobyl-2
Please answer a question about the following table 

header: Location | Reactor type | Status | Net Capacity (MWe) | Gross Capacity (MWe) row 1 : Chernobyl-1 | RBMK-1000 | shut down in 1996 | 740 | 800
row 2 : Chernobyl-2 | RBMK-1000 | shut down in 1991 | 925 | 1,000
row 3 : Chernobyl-3 | RBMK-1000 | shut down in 2000 | 925 | 1,000
row 4 : Chernobyl-4 | RBMK-1000 | destroyed in the 1986 accident | 925 | 1,000
row 5 : Chernobyl-5 | RBMK-1000 | construction cancelled in 1988 | 950 | 1,000
row 6 : Chernobyl-6 | RBMK-1000 | construction cancelled in 1988 | 950 | 1,000
row 7 : Ignalina-1 | RBMK-1500 | shut down in 2004 | 1,185 | 1,300
row 8 : Ignalina-2 | RBMK-1500 | shut down in 2009 | 1,185 | 1,300
row 9 : Ignalina-3 | RBMK-1500 | construction cancelled in 1988 | 1,380 | 1,500
row 10 : Ignalina-4 | RBMK-1500 | plan cancelled in 1988 | 1,380 | 1,500
row 11 : Kostroma-1 | RBMK-1500 | construction cancelled in 1980s | 1,380 | 1,500
row 12 : Kostroma-2 | RBMK-1500 | construction cancelled in 1980s | 1,380 | 1,500
row 13 : Kursk-1 | RBMK-1000 | operational until 2021 | 925 | 1,000
row 14 : Kursk-2 | RBMK-1000 | operational until 2024 | 925 | 1,000
row 15 : Kursk-3 | RBMK-1000 | operational until March 2014 | 925 | 1,000
row 16 : Kursk-4 | RBMK-1000 | operational until February 2016 | 925 | 1,000
row 17 : Kursk-5 | MKER-1000 | construction begin was 1985, since then shelve | 925 | 1,000
row 18 : Kursk-6 | RBMK-1000 | construction cancelled in 1993 | 925 | 1,000
row 19 : Leningrad-1 | RBMK-1000 | operational | 925 | 1,000
row 20 : Leningrad-2 | RBMK-1000 | operational until 2021 | 925 | 1,000
row 21 : Leningrad-3 | RBMK-1000 | operational until June 2025 | 925 | 1,000
row 22 : Leningrad-4 | RBMK-1000 | operational until August 2026 | 925 | 1,000
row 23 : Smolensk-1 | RBMK-1000 | operational until December 2022 | 925 | 1,000
row 24 : Smolensk-2 | RBMK-1000 | operational until July 2015 | 925 | 1,000
row 25 : Smolensk-3 | RBMK-1000 | operational until July 2023 | 925 | 1,000
row 26 : Smolensk-4 | RBMK-1000 | construction cancelled in 1993 | 925 | 1,000

what are all of the location names?

Answer: Chernobyl-1, Chernobyl-2, Chernobyl-3, Chernobyl-4, Chernobyl-5, Chernobyl-6, Ignalina-1, Ignalina-2, Ignalina-3, Ignalina-4, Kostroma-1, Kostroma-2, Kursk-1, Kursk-2, Kursk-3, Kursk-4, Kursk-5, Kursk-6, Leningrad-1, Leningrad-2, Leningrad-3, Leningrad-4, Smolensk-1, Smolensk-2, Smolensk-3, Smolensk-4
Please answer a question about the following table 

header: Location | Reactor type | Status | Net Capacity (MWe) | Gross Capacity (MWe) row 1 : Chernobyl-1 | RBMK-1000 | shut down in 1996 | 740 | 800
row 2 : Chernobyl-2 | RBMK-1000 | shut down in 1991 | 925 | 1,000
row 3 : Chernobyl-3 | RBMK-1000 | shut down in 2000 | 925 | 1,000
row 4 : Chernobyl-4 | RBMK-1000 | destroyed in the 1986 accident | 925 | 1,000
row 5 : Chernobyl-5 | RBMK-1000 | construction cancelled in 1988 | 950 | 1,000
row 6 : Chernobyl-6 | RBMK-1000 | construction cancelled in 1988 | 950 | 1,000
row 7 : Ignalina-1 | RBMK-1500 | shut down in 2004 | 1,185 | 1,300
row 8 : Ignalina-2 | RBMK-1500 | shut down in 2009 | 1,185 | 1,300
row 9 : Ignalina-3 | RBMK-1500 | construction cancelled in 1988 | 1,380 | 1,500
row 10 : Ignalina-4 | RBMK-1500 | plan cancelled in 1988 | 1,380 | 1,500
row 11 : Kostroma-1 | RBMK-1500 | construction cancelled in 1980s | 1,380 | 1,500
row 12 : Kostroma-2 | RBMK-1500 | construction cancelled in 1980s | 1,380 | 1,500
row 13 : Kursk-1 | RBMK-1000 | operational until 2021 | 925 | 1,000
row 14 : Kursk-2 | RBMK-1000 | operational until 2024 | 925 | 1,000
row 15 : Kursk-3 | RBMK-1000 | operational until March 2014 | 925 | 1,000
row 16 : Kursk-4 | RBMK-1000 | operational until February 2016 | 925 | 1,000
row 17 : Kursk-5 | MKER-1000 | construction begin was 1985, since then shelve | 925 | 1,000
row 18 : Kursk-6 | RBMK-1000 | construction cancelled in 1993 | 925 | 1,000
row 19 : Leningrad-1 | RBMK-1000 | operational | 925 | 1,000
row 20 : Leningrad-2 | RBMK-1000 | operational until 2021 | 925 | 1,000
row 21 : Leningrad-3 | RBMK-1000 | operational until June 2025 | 925 | 1,000
row 22 : Leningrad-4 | RBMK-1000 | operational until August 2026 | 925 | 1,000
row 23 : Smolensk-1 | RBMK-1000 | operational until December 2022 | 925 | 1,000
row 24 : Smolensk-2 | RBMK-1000 | operational until July 2015 | 925 | 1,000
row 25 : Smolensk-3 | RBMK-1000 | operational until July 2023 | 925 | 1,000
row 26 : Smolensk-4 | RBMK-1000 | construction cancelled in 1993 | 925 | 1,000

what are all of the location names? and their net capacities?

Answer: 740, 925, 925, 925, 950, 950, 1,185, 1,185, 1,380, 1,380, 1,380, 1,380, 925, 925, 925, 925, 925, 925, 925, 925, 925, 925, 925, 925, 925, 925
Please answer a question about the following table 

header: Location | Reactor type | Status | Net Capacity (MWe) | Gross Capacity (MWe) row 1 : Chernobyl-1 | RBMK-1000 | shut down in 1996 | 740 | 800
row 2 : Chernobyl-2 | RBMK-1000 | shut down in 1991 | 925 | 1,000
row 3 : Chernobyl-3 | RBMK-1000 | shut down in 2000 | 925 | 1,000
row 4 : Chernobyl-4 | RBMK-1000 | destroyed in the 1986 accident | 925 | 1,000
row 5 : Chernobyl-5 | RBMK-1000 | construction cancelled in 1988 | 950 | 1,000
row 6 : Chernobyl-6 | RBMK-1000 | construction cancelled in 1988 | 950 | 1,000
row 7 : Ignalina-1 | RBMK-1500 | shut down in 2004 | 1,185 | 1,300
row 8 : Ignalina-2 | RBMK-1500 | shut down in 2009 | 1,185 | 1,300
row 9 : Ignalina-3 | RBMK-1500 | construction cancelled in 1988 | 1,380 | 1,500
row 10 : Ignalina-4 | RBMK-1500 | plan cancelled in 1988 | 1,380 | 1,500
row 11 : Kostroma-1 | RBMK-1500 | construction cancelled in 1980s | 1,380 | 1,500
row 12 : Kostroma-2 | RBMK-1500 | construction cancelled in 1980s | 1,380 | 1,500
row 13 : Kursk-1 | RBMK-1000 | operational until 2021 | 925 | 1,000
row 14 : Kursk-2 | RBMK-1000 | operational until 2024 | 925 | 1,000
row 15 : Kursk-3 | RBMK-1000 | operational until March 2014 | 925 | 1,000
row 16 : Kursk-4 | RBMK-1000 | operational until February 2016 | 925 | 1,000
row 17 : Kursk-5 | MKER-1000 | construction begin was 1985, since then shelve | 925 | 1,000
row 18 : Kursk-6 | RBMK-1000 | construction cancelled in 1993 | 925 | 1,000
row 19 : Leningrad-1 | RBMK-1000 | operational | 925 | 1,000
row 20 : Leningrad-2 | RBMK-1000 | operational until 2021 | 925 | 1,000
row 21 : Leningrad-3 | RBMK-1000 | operational until June 2025 | 925 | 1,000
row 22 : Leningrad-4 | RBMK-1000 | operational until August 2026 | 925 | 1,000
row 23 : Smolensk-1 | RBMK-1000 | operational until December 2022 | 925 | 1,000
row 24 : Smolensk-2 | RBMK-1000 | operational until July 2015 | 925 | 1,000
row 25 : Smolensk-3 | RBMK-1000 | operational until July 2023 | 925 | 1,000
row 26 : Smolensk-4 | RBMK-1000 | construction cancelled in 1993 | 925 | 1,000

what are all of the location names? and their net capacities? what about just between chernobyl-1 and chernobyl-2?

Answer: 740, 925
Please answer a question about the following table 

header: Location | Reactor type | Status | Net Capacity (MWe) | Gross Capacity (MWe) row 1 : Chernobyl-1 | RBMK-1000 | shut down in 1996 | 740 | 800
row 2 : Chernobyl-2 | RBMK-1000 | shut down in 1991 | 925 | 1,000
row 3 : Chernobyl-3 | RBMK-1000 | shut down in 2000 | 925 | 1,000
row 4 : Chernobyl-4 | RBMK-1000 | destroyed in the 1986 accident | 925 | 1,000
row 5 : Chernobyl-5 | RBMK-1000 | construction cancelled in 1988 | 950 | 1,000
row 6 : Chernobyl-6 | RBMK-1000 | construction cancelled in 1988 | 950 | 1,000
row 7 : Ignalina-1 | RBMK-1500 | shut down in 2004 | 1,185 | 1,300
row 8 : Ignalina-2 | RBMK-1500 | shut down in 2009 | 1,185 | 1,300
row 9 : Ignalina-3 | RBMK-1500 | construction cancelled in 1988 | 1,380 | 1,500
row 10 : Ignalina-4 | RBMK-1500 | plan cancelled in 1988 | 1,380 | 1,500
row 11 : Kostroma-1 | RBMK-1500 | construction cancelled in 1980s | 1,380 | 1,500
row 12 : Kostroma-2 | RBMK-1500 | construction cancelled in 1980s | 1,380 | 1,500
row 13 : Kursk-1 | RBMK-1000 | operational until 2021 | 925 | 1,000
row 14 : Kursk-2 | RBMK-1000 | operational until 2024 | 925 | 1,000
row 15 : Kursk-3 | RBMK-1000 | operational until March 2014 | 925 | 1,000
row 16 : Kursk-4 | RBMK-1000 | operational until February 2016 | 925 | 1,000
row 17 : Kursk-5 | MKER-1000 | construction begin was 1985, since then shelve | 925 | 1,000
row 18 : Kursk-6 | RBMK-1000 | construction cancelled in 1993 | 925 | 1,000
row 19 : Leningrad-1 | RBMK-1000 | operational | 925 | 1,000
row 20 : Leningrad-2 | RBMK-1000 | operational until 2021 | 925 | 1,000
row 21 : Leningrad-3 | RBMK-1000 | operational until June 2025 | 925 | 1,000
row 22 : Leningrad-4 | RBMK-1000 | operational until August 2026 | 925 | 1,000
row 23 : Smolensk-1 | RBMK-1000 | operational until December 2022 | 925 | 1,000
row 24 : Smolensk-2 | RBMK-1000 | operational until July 2015 | 925 | 1,000
row 25 : Smolensk-3 | RBMK-1000 | operational until July 2023 | 925 | 1,000
row 26 : Smolensk-4 | RBMK-1000 | construction cancelled in 1993 | 925 | 1,000

what are all of the location names? and their net capacities? what about just between chernobyl-1 and chernobyl-2? which of the two has a higher capacity?

Answer: Chernobyl-2
Please answer a question about the following table 

header: Nation | Date | Quantity | Type | Notes row 1 : Netherlands | 2001 | 2.0 | 4207 | In 2001 the Netherlands ordered two vessels to serve in
row 2 : United Kingdom | 2001 | 4.0 | 4207 | the UKBA 42m Customs Cutters See
row 3 : Honduras | 2013 | 2.0 | 4207 | Honduran Navy 2 patrol vessels 4207 (
row 4 : Jamaica | 2005 | 3.0 | 4207 | The three vessels which form the County-class are
row 5 : Barbados | 2007 | 3.0 | 4207 | Built for the Barbados Coast Guard. HM
row 6 : Albania | 2007 | 4.0 | 4207 | The Iliria and three other vessels
row 7 : South Africa | 2004 | 3.0 | 4708 | Lillian Ngoyi-class environmental in
row 8 : Netherlands Antilles & Aruba | 1998 | 3.0 | 4100 | Jaguar, Panter and Poema employed
row 9 : Vietnam | 2004 | 3.0 | 4100 | SAR-411, SAR-412 and
row 10 : Canada | 2009 | 9.0 | 4207 | In 2009 the Department of Fisheries and Oceans
row 11 : Mexico | 2012 | 6.0 | 4207 | The Mexican Navy - Armada de
row 12 : United States | 2012 | nan | 4708 | The United States Coast Guard is proposing the purchase
row 13 : Bulgaria | 2010 | 1.0 | 4207 | The Bulgarian Border Police accepted delivery of the Ob
row 14 : Venezuela | 2014 | 6.0 | 4207 | The Bolivarian Armada of Venezuela
row 15 : Venezuela | 2014 | 6.0 | 5009 | The Bolivarian Armada of Venezuela
row 16 : Bahama's | 2013 | 4.0 | 4207 | The Royal Bahamas Defence Forces ordered 4 vessels together
row 17 : Qatar | 2014 | 6.0 | 5009 | The Qatar Armed Forces ordered 6 vessels together

which countries have patrol vessels?

Answer: Netherlands, United Kingdom, Honduras, Jamaica, Barbados, Albania, South Africa, Netherlands Antilles & Aruba, Vietnam, Canada, Mexico, United States, Bulgaria, Venezuela, Venezuela, Bahama's, Qatar
Please answer a question about the following table 

header: Nation | Date | Quantity | Type | Notes row 1 : Netherlands | 2001 | 2.0 | 4207 | In 2001 the Netherlands ordered two vessels to serve in
row 2 : United Kingdom | 2001 | 4.0 | 4207 | the UKBA 42m Customs Cutters See
row 3 : Honduras | 2013 | 2.0 | 4207 | Honduran Navy 2 patrol vessels 4207 (
row 4 : Jamaica | 2005 | 3.0 | 4207 | The three vessels which form the County-class are
row 5 : Barbados | 2007 | 3.0 | 4207 | Built for the Barbados Coast Guard. HM
row 6 : Albania | 2007 | 4.0 | 4207 | The Iliria and three other vessels
row 7 : South Africa | 2004 | 3.0 | 4708 | Lillian Ngoyi-class environmental in
row 8 : Netherlands Antilles & Aruba | 1998 | 3.0 | 4100 | Jaguar, Panter and Poema employed
row 9 : Vietnam | 2004 | 3.0 | 4100 | SAR-411, SAR-412 and
row 10 : Canada | 2009 | 9.0 | 4207 | In 2009 the Department of Fisheries and Oceans
row 11 : Mexico | 2012 | 6.0 | 4207 | The Mexican Navy - Armada de
row 12 : United States | 2012 | nan | 4708 | The United States Coast Guard is proposing the purchase
row 13 : Bulgaria | 2010 | 1.0 | 4207 | The Bulgarian Border Police accepted delivery of the Ob
row 14 : Venezuela | 2014 | 6.0 | 4207 | The Bolivarian Armada of Venezuela
row 15 : Venezuela | 2014 | 6.0 | 5009 | The Bolivarian Armada of Venezuela
row 16 : Bahama's | 2013 | 4.0 | 4207 | The Royal Bahamas Defence Forces ordered 4 vessels together
row 17 : Qatar | 2014 | 6.0 | 5009 | The Qatar Armed Forces ordered 6 vessels together

which countries have patrol vessels? how many does each have?

Answer: Netherlands, 2, United Kingdom, 4, Honduras, 2, Jamaica, 3, Barbados, 3, Albania, 4, South Africa, 3, Netherlands Antilles & Aruba, 3, Vietnam, 3, Canada, 9, Mexico, 6, United States, Bulgaria, 1, Venezuela, 6, Venezuela, 6, Bahama's, 4, Qatar, 6
Please answer a question about the following table 

header: Nation | Date | Quantity | Type | Notes row 1 : Netherlands | 2001 | 2.0 | 4207 | In 2001 the Netherlands ordered two vessels to serve in
row 2 : United Kingdom | 2001 | 4.0 | 4207 | the UKBA 42m Customs Cutters See
row 3 : Honduras | 2013 | 2.0 | 4207 | Honduran Navy 2 patrol vessels 4207 (
row 4 : Jamaica | 2005 | 3.0 | 4207 | The three vessels which form the County-class are
row 5 : Barbados | 2007 | 3.0 | 4207 | Built for the Barbados Coast Guard. HM
row 6 : Albania | 2007 | 4.0 | 4207 | The Iliria and three other vessels
row 7 : South Africa | 2004 | 3.0 | 4708 | Lillian Ngoyi-class environmental in
row 8 : Netherlands Antilles & Aruba | 1998 | 3.0 | 4100 | Jaguar, Panter and Poema employed
row 9 : Vietnam | 2004 | 3.0 | 4100 | SAR-411, SAR-412 and
row 10 : Canada | 2009 | 9.0 | 4207 | In 2009 the Department of Fisheries and Oceans
row 11 : Mexico | 2012 | 6.0 | 4207 | The Mexican Navy - Armada de
row 12 : United States | 2012 | nan | 4708 | The United States Coast Guard is proposing the purchase
row 13 : Bulgaria | 2010 | 1.0 | 4207 | The Bulgarian Border Police accepted delivery of the Ob
row 14 : Venezuela | 2014 | 6.0 | 4207 | The Bolivarian Armada of Venezuela
row 15 : Venezuela | 2014 | 6.0 | 5009 | The Bolivarian Armada of Venezuela
row 16 : Bahama's | 2013 | 4.0 | 4207 | The Royal Bahamas Defence Forces ordered 4 vessels together
row 17 : Qatar | 2014 | 6.0 | 5009 | The Qatar Armed Forces ordered 6 vessels together

which countries have patrol vessels? how many does each have? who has the fewest?

Answer: Bulgaria
Please answer a question about the following table 

header: Nation | Date | Quantity | Type | Notes row 1 : Netherlands | 2001 | 2.0 | 4207 | In 2001 the Netherlands ordered two vessels to serve in
row 2 : United Kingdom | 2001 | 4.0 | 4207 | the UKBA 42m Customs Cutters See
row 3 : Honduras | 2013 | 2.0 | 4207 | Honduran Navy 2 patrol vessels 4207 (
row 4 : Jamaica | 2005 | 3.0 | 4207 | The three vessels which form the County-class are
row 5 : Barbados | 2007 | 3.0 | 4207 | Built for the Barbados Coast Guard. HM
row 6 : Albania | 2007 | 4.0 | 4207 | The Iliria and three other vessels
row 7 : South Africa | 2004 | 3.0 | 4708 | Lillian Ngoyi-class environmental in
row 8 : Netherlands Antilles & Aruba | 1998 | 3.0 | 4100 | Jaguar, Panter and Poema employed
row 9 : Vietnam | 2004 | 3.0 | 4100 | SAR-411, SAR-412 and
row 10 : Canada | 2009 | 9.0 | 4207 | In 2009 the Department of Fisheries and Oceans
row 11 : Mexico | 2012 | 6.0 | 4207 | The Mexican Navy - Armada de
row 12 : United States | 2012 | nan | 4708 | The United States Coast Guard is proposing the purchase
row 13 : Bulgaria | 2010 | 1.0 | 4207 | The Bulgarian Border Police accepted delivery of the Ob
row 14 : Venezuela | 2014 | 6.0 | 4207 | The Bolivarian Armada of Venezuela
row 15 : Venezuela | 2014 | 6.0 | 5009 | The Bolivarian Armada of Venezuela
row 16 : Bahama's | 2013 | 4.0 | 4207 | The Royal Bahamas Defence Forces ordered 4 vessels together
row 17 : Qatar | 2014 | 6.0 | 5009 | The Qatar Armed Forces ordered 6 vessels together

what are the numbers of vessels each country has serving?

Answer: 2, 4, 2, 3, 3, 4, 3, 3, 3, 9, 6, , 1, 6, 6, 4, 6
Please answer a question about the following table 

header: Nation | Date | Quantity | Type | Notes row 1 : Netherlands | 2001 | 2.0 | 4207 | In 2001 the Netherlands ordered two vessels to serve in
row 2 : United Kingdom | 2001 | 4.0 | 4207 | the UKBA 42m Customs Cutters See
row 3 : Honduras | 2013 | 2.0 | 4207 | Honduran Navy 2 patrol vessels 4207 (
row 4 : Jamaica | 2005 | 3.0 | 4207 | The three vessels which form the County-class are
row 5 : Barbados | 2007 | 3.0 | 4207 | Built for the Barbados Coast Guard. HM
row 6 : Albania | 2007 | 4.0 | 4207 | The Iliria and three other vessels
row 7 : South Africa | 2004 | 3.0 | 4708 | Lillian Ngoyi-class environmental in
row 8 : Netherlands Antilles & Aruba | 1998 | 3.0 | 4100 | Jaguar, Panter and Poema employed
row 9 : Vietnam | 2004 | 3.0 | 4100 | SAR-411, SAR-412 and
row 10 : Canada | 2009 | 9.0 | 4207 | In 2009 the Department of Fisheries and Oceans
row 11 : Mexico | 2012 | 6.0 | 4207 | The Mexican Navy - Armada de
row 12 : United States | 2012 | nan | 4708 | The United States Coast Guard is proposing the purchase
row 13 : Bulgaria | 2010 | 1.0 | 4207 | The Bulgarian Border Police accepted delivery of the Ob
row 14 : Venezuela | 2014 | 6.0 | 4207 | The Bolivarian Armada of Venezuela
row 15 : Venezuela | 2014 | 6.0 | 5009 | The Bolivarian Armada of Venezuela
row 16 : Bahama's | 2013 | 4.0 | 4207 | The Royal Bahamas Defence Forces ordered 4 vessels together
row 17 : Qatar | 2014 | 6.0 | 5009 | The Qatar Armed Forces ordered 6 vessels together

what are the numbers of vessels each country has serving? what is the lowest number of vessels a country has serving?

Answer: 1
Please answer a question about the following table 

header: Nation | Date | Quantity | Type | Notes row 1 : Netherlands | 2001 | 2.0 | 4207 | In 2001 the Netherlands ordered two vessels to serve in
row 2 : United Kingdom | 2001 | 4.0 | 4207 | the UKBA 42m Customs Cutters See
row 3 : Honduras | 2013 | 2.0 | 4207 | Honduran Navy 2 patrol vessels 4207 (
row 4 : Jamaica | 2005 | 3.0 | 4207 | The three vessels which form the County-class are
row 5 : Barbados | 2007 | 3.0 | 4207 | Built for the Barbados Coast Guard. HM
row 6 : Albania | 2007 | 4.0 | 4207 | The Iliria and three other vessels
row 7 : South Africa | 2004 | 3.0 | 4708 | Lillian Ngoyi-class environmental in
row 8 : Netherlands Antilles & Aruba | 1998 | 3.0 | 4100 | Jaguar, Panter and Poema employed
row 9 : Vietnam | 2004 | 3.0 | 4100 | SAR-411, SAR-412 and
row 10 : Canada | 2009 | 9.0 | 4207 | In 2009 the Department of Fisheries and Oceans
row 11 : Mexico | 2012 | 6.0 | 4207 | The Mexican Navy - Armada de
row 12 : United States | 2012 | nan | 4708 | The United States Coast Guard is proposing the purchase
row 13 : Bulgaria | 2010 | 1.0 | 4207 | The Bulgarian Border Police accepted delivery of the Ob
row 14 : Venezuela | 2014 | 6.0 | 4207 | The Bolivarian Armada of Venezuela
row 15 : Venezuela | 2014 | 6.0 | 5009 | The Bolivarian Armada of Venezuela
row 16 : Bahama's | 2013 | 4.0 | 4207 | The Royal Bahamas Defence Forces ordered 4 vessels together
row 17 : Qatar | 2014 | 6.0 | 5009 | The Qatar Armed Forces ordered 6 vessels together

what are the numbers of vessels each country has serving? what is the lowest number of vessels a country has serving? what country has one serving vessel?

Answer: Bulgaria
Please answer a question about the following table 

header: Nation | Date | Quantity | Type | Notes row 1 : Netherlands | 2001 | 2.0 | 4207 | In 2001 the Netherlands ordered two vessels to serve in
row 2 : United Kingdom | 2001 | 4.0 | 4207 | the UKBA 42m Customs Cutters See
row 3 : Honduras | 2013 | 2.0 | 4207 | Honduran Navy 2 patrol vessels 4207 (
row 4 : Jamaica | 2005 | 3.0 | 4207 | The three vessels which form the County-class are
row 5 : Barbados | 2007 | 3.0 | 4207 | Built for the Barbados Coast Guard. HM
row 6 : Albania | 2007 | 4.0 | 4207 | The Iliria and three other vessels
row 7 : South Africa | 2004 | 3.0 | 4708 | Lillian Ngoyi-class environmental in
row 8 : Netherlands Antilles & Aruba | 1998 | 3.0 | 4100 | Jaguar, Panter and Poema employed
row 9 : Vietnam | 2004 | 3.0 | 4100 | SAR-411, SAR-412 and
row 10 : Canada | 2009 | 9.0 | 4207 | In 2009 the Department of Fisheries and Oceans
row 11 : Mexico | 2012 | 6.0 | 4207 | The Mexican Navy - Armada de
row 12 : United States | 2012 | nan | 4708 | The United States Coast Guard is proposing the purchase
row 13 : Bulgaria | 2010 | 1.0 | 4207 | The Bulgarian Border Police accepted delivery of the Ob
row 14 : Venezuela | 2014 | 6.0 | 4207 | The Bolivarian Armada of Venezuela
row 15 : Venezuela | 2014 | 6.0 | 5009 | The Bolivarian Armada of Venezuela
row 16 : Bahama's | 2013 | 4.0 | 4207 | The Royal Bahamas Defence Forces ordered 4 vessels together
row 17 : Qatar | 2014 | 6.0 | 5009 | The Qatar Armed Forces ordered 6 vessels together

what 3 countries have the smallest number of vessels in the coast guard?

Answer: 2, 2, 1
Please answer a question about the following table 

header: Nation | Date | Quantity | Type | Notes row 1 : Netherlands | 2001 | 2.0 | 4207 | In 2001 the Netherlands ordered two vessels to serve in
row 2 : United Kingdom | 2001 | 4.0 | 4207 | the UKBA 42m Customs Cutters See
row 3 : Honduras | 2013 | 2.0 | 4207 | Honduran Navy 2 patrol vessels 4207 (
row 4 : Jamaica | 2005 | 3.0 | 4207 | The three vessels which form the County-class are
row 5 : Barbados | 2007 | 3.0 | 4207 | Built for the Barbados Coast Guard. HM
row 6 : Albania | 2007 | 4.0 | 4207 | The Iliria and three other vessels
row 7 : South Africa | 2004 | 3.0 | 4708 | Lillian Ngoyi-class environmental in
row 8 : Netherlands Antilles & Aruba | 1998 | 3.0 | 4100 | Jaguar, Panter and Poema employed
row 9 : Vietnam | 2004 | 3.0 | 4100 | SAR-411, SAR-412 and
row 10 : Canada | 2009 | 9.0 | 4207 | In 2009 the Department of Fisheries and Oceans
row 11 : Mexico | 2012 | 6.0 | 4207 | The Mexican Navy - Armada de
row 12 : United States | 2012 | nan | 4708 | The United States Coast Guard is proposing the purchase
row 13 : Bulgaria | 2010 | 1.0 | 4207 | The Bulgarian Border Police accepted delivery of the Ob
row 14 : Venezuela | 2014 | 6.0 | 4207 | The Bolivarian Armada of Venezuela
row 15 : Venezuela | 2014 | 6.0 | 5009 | The Bolivarian Armada of Venezuela
row 16 : Bahama's | 2013 | 4.0 | 4207 | The Royal Bahamas Defence Forces ordered 4 vessels together
row 17 : Qatar | 2014 | 6.0 | 5009 | The Qatar Armed Forces ordered 6 vessels together

what 3 countries have the smallest number of vessels in the coast guard? which has the smallest number?

Answer: Bulgaria
Please answer a question about the following table 

header: Date | Time | Opponent# | Rank# | Site | TV | Result | Attendance row 1 : September 1 | 2:30 PM | #9 (FCS) Northern Iowa* | #12 | Camp Randall Stadium * Madison, WI | BTN | W 26-21 | 79,568
row 2 : September 8 | 3:00 PM | at Oregon State* | #13 | Reser Stadium * Corvallis, OR | FX | L 7-10 | 42,189
row 3 : September 15 | 7:00 PM | Utah State* | #22 | Camp Randall Stadium * Madison, WI | BTN | W 16-14 | 79,332
row 4 : September 22 | 11:00 AM | UTEP* | #24 | Camp Randall Stadium * Madison, WI | ESPN2 | W 37-26 | 79,806
row 5 : September 29 | 7:00 PM | at #20 Nebraska | #23 | Memorial Stadium * Lincoln, NE | ABC | L 27-30 | 85,962
row 6 : October 6 | 2:30 PM | Illinois | nan | Camp Randall Stadium * Madison, WI | ABC/ESPN2 | W 31-14 | 80,096
row 7 : October 13 | 11:00 AM | at Purdue | nan | Ross-Ade Stadium * West Lafayette, IN | BTN | W 38-14 | 46,007
row 8 : October 20 | 11:00 AM | Minnesota | nan | Camp Randall Stadium * Madison, WI (Paul | ESPNU | W 38-13 | 80,587
row 9 : October 27 | 2:30 PM | Michigan State | #25 | Camp Randall Stadium * Madison, WI | ABC/ESPN2 | L 13-16 OT | 80,538
row 10 : November 10 | 11:00 AM | at Indiana | nan | Memorial Stadium * Bloomington, IN | ESPN2 | W 62-14 | 43,240
row 11 : November 17 | 2:30 PM | Ohio State | nan | Camp Randall Stadium * Madison, WI | ABC/ESPN2 | L 14-21 OT | 80,112
row 12 : November 24 | 2:30 PM | at Penn State | nan | Beaver Stadium * University Park, PA | ESPN2 | L 21-24 OT | 93,505
row 13 : December 1 | 7:00 PM | vs. #14 Nebraska | nan | Lucas Oil Stadium * Indianapolis, IN (Big Ten | FOX | W 70-31 | 41,260
row 14 : January 1, 2013 | 4:10 PM | vs. #8 Stanford | #23 | Rose Bowl * Pasadena, CA ( | ESPN | L 14-20 | 93,259

on what dates did the 2012 wisconsin  badgers football team play?

Answer: September 1, September 8, September 15, September 22, September 29, October 6, October 13, October 20, October 27, November 10, November 17, November 24, December 1, January 1, 2013
Please answer a question about the following table 

header: Date | Time | Opponent# | Rank# | Site | TV | Result | Attendance row 1 : September 1 | 2:30 PM | #9 (FCS) Northern Iowa* | #12 | Camp Randall Stadium * Madison, WI | BTN | W 26-21 | 79,568
row 2 : September 8 | 3:00 PM | at Oregon State* | #13 | Reser Stadium * Corvallis, OR | FX | L 7-10 | 42,189
row 3 : September 15 | 7:00 PM | Utah State* | #22 | Camp Randall Stadium * Madison, WI | BTN | W 16-14 | 79,332
row 4 : September 22 | 11:00 AM | UTEP* | #24 | Camp Randall Stadium * Madison, WI | ESPN2 | W 37-26 | 79,806
row 5 : September 29 | 7:00 PM | at #20 Nebraska | #23 | Memorial Stadium * Lincoln, NE | ABC | L 27-30 | 85,962
row 6 : October 6 | 2:30 PM | Illinois | nan | Camp Randall Stadium * Madison, WI | ABC/ESPN2 | W 31-14 | 80,096
row 7 : October 13 | 11:00 AM | at Purdue | nan | Ross-Ade Stadium * West Lafayette, IN | BTN | W 38-14 | 46,007
row 8 : October 20 | 11:00 AM | Minnesota | nan | Camp Randall Stadium * Madison, WI (Paul | ESPNU | W 38-13 | 80,587
row 9 : October 27 | 2:30 PM | Michigan State | #25 | Camp Randall Stadium * Madison, WI | ABC/ESPN2 | L 13-16 OT | 80,538
row 10 : November 10 | 11:00 AM | at Indiana | nan | Memorial Stadium * Bloomington, IN | ESPN2 | W 62-14 | 43,240
row 11 : November 17 | 2:30 PM | Ohio State | nan | Camp Randall Stadium * Madison, WI | ABC/ESPN2 | L 14-21 OT | 80,112
row 12 : November 24 | 2:30 PM | at Penn State | nan | Beaver Stadium * University Park, PA | ESPN2 | L 21-24 OT | 93,505
row 13 : December 1 | 7:00 PM | vs. #14 Nebraska | nan | Lucas Oil Stadium * Indianapolis, IN (Big Ten | FOX | W 70-31 | 41,260
row 14 : January 1, 2013 | 4:10 PM | vs. #8 Stanford | #23 | Rose Bowl * Pasadena, CA ( | ESPN | L 14-20 | 93,259

on what dates did the 2012 wisconsin  badgers football team play? of these games, which had an attendance over 90,000?

Answer: November 24, January 1, 2013
Please answer a question about the following table 

header: Date | Time | Opponent# | Rank# | Site | TV | Result | Attendance row 1 : September 1 | 2:30 PM | #9 (FCS) Northern Iowa* | #12 | Camp Randall Stadium * Madison, WI | BTN | W 26-21 | 79,568
row 2 : September 8 | 3:00 PM | at Oregon State* | #13 | Reser Stadium * Corvallis, OR | FX | L 7-10 | 42,189
row 3 : September 15 | 7:00 PM | Utah State* | #22 | Camp Randall Stadium * Madison, WI | BTN | W 16-14 | 79,332
row 4 : September 22 | 11:00 AM | UTEP* | #24 | Camp Randall Stadium * Madison, WI | ESPN2 | W 37-26 | 79,806
row 5 : September 29 | 7:00 PM | at #20 Nebraska | #23 | Memorial Stadium * Lincoln, NE | ABC | L 27-30 | 85,962
row 6 : October 6 | 2:30 PM | Illinois | nan | Camp Randall Stadium * Madison, WI | ABC/ESPN2 | W 31-14 | 80,096
row 7 : October 13 | 11:00 AM | at Purdue | nan | Ross-Ade Stadium * West Lafayette, IN | BTN | W 38-14 | 46,007
row 8 : October 20 | 11:00 AM | Minnesota | nan | Camp Randall Stadium * Madison, WI (Paul | ESPNU | W 38-13 | 80,587
row 9 : October 27 | 2:30 PM | Michigan State | #25 | Camp Randall Stadium * Madison, WI | ABC/ESPN2 | L 13-16 OT | 80,538
row 10 : November 10 | 11:00 AM | at Indiana | nan | Memorial Stadium * Bloomington, IN | ESPN2 | W 62-14 | 43,240
row 11 : November 17 | 2:30 PM | Ohio State | nan | Camp Randall Stadium * Madison, WI | ABC/ESPN2 | L 14-21 OT | 80,112
row 12 : November 24 | 2:30 PM | at Penn State | nan | Beaver Stadium * University Park, PA | ESPN2 | L 21-24 OT | 93,505
row 13 : December 1 | 7:00 PM | vs. #14 Nebraska | nan | Lucas Oil Stadium * Indianapolis, IN (Big Ten | FOX | W 70-31 | 41,260
row 14 : January 1, 2013 | 4:10 PM | vs. #8 Stanford | #23 | Rose Bowl * Pasadena, CA ( | ESPN | L 14-20 | 93,259

on what dates did the 2012 wisconsin  badgers football team play? of these games, which had an attendance over 90,000? what were the exact attendance numbers for those games?

Answer: 93,505, 93,259
Please answer a question about the following table 

header: Date | Time | Opponent# | Rank# | Site | TV | Result | Attendance row 1 : September 1 | 2:30 PM | #9 (FCS) Northern Iowa* | #12 | Camp Randall Stadium * Madison, WI | BTN | W 26-21 | 79,568
row 2 : September 8 | 3:00 PM | at Oregon State* | #13 | Reser Stadium * Corvallis, OR | FX | L 7-10 | 42,189
row 3 : September 15 | 7:00 PM | Utah State* | #22 | Camp Randall Stadium * Madison, WI | BTN | W 16-14 | 79,332
row 4 : September 22 | 11:00 AM | UTEP* | #24 | Camp Randall Stadium * Madison, WI | ESPN2 | W 37-26 | 79,806
row 5 : September 29 | 7:00 PM | at #20 Nebraska | #23 | Memorial Stadium * Lincoln, NE | ABC | L 27-30 | 85,962
row 6 : October 6 | 2:30 PM | Illinois | nan | Camp Randall Stadium * Madison, WI | ABC/ESPN2 | W 31-14 | 80,096
row 7 : October 13 | 11:00 AM | at Purdue | nan | Ross-Ade Stadium * West Lafayette, IN | BTN | W 38-14 | 46,007
row 8 : October 20 | 11:00 AM | Minnesota | nan | Camp Randall Stadium * Madison, WI (Paul | ESPNU | W 38-13 | 80,587
row 9 : October 27 | 2:30 PM | Michigan State | #25 | Camp Randall Stadium * Madison, WI | ABC/ESPN2 | L 13-16 OT | 80,538
row 10 : November 10 | 11:00 AM | at Indiana | nan | Memorial Stadium * Bloomington, IN | ESPN2 | W 62-14 | 43,240
row 11 : November 17 | 2:30 PM | Ohio State | nan | Camp Randall Stadium * Madison, WI | ABC/ESPN2 | L 14-21 OT | 80,112
row 12 : November 24 | 2:30 PM | at Penn State | nan | Beaver Stadium * University Park, PA | ESPN2 | L 21-24 OT | 93,505
row 13 : December 1 | 7:00 PM | vs. #14 Nebraska | nan | Lucas Oil Stadium * Indianapolis, IN (Big Ten | FOX | W 70-31 | 41,260
row 14 : January 1, 2013 | 4:10 PM | vs. #8 Stanford | #23 | Rose Bowl * Pasadena, CA ( | ESPN | L 14-20 | 93,259

on what dates did the 2012 wisconsin  badgers football team play? of these games, which had an attendance over 90,000? what were the exact attendance numbers for those games? which was the best attendance on the chart?

Answer: 93,505