Remember:

The free add/drop period will end on Wednesday Aug30 at noon.  After that
point, we will submit add/drop bids to Pat at pryder@enron.com.

To review:  add/drops will be done through an auction system.  If you want to
pick up a player you need to submit a bid by e-mail to Pat by 5:00 PM on
Wednesday of every week.  The person with the highest bid will receive the
player ($0 bids are acceptable).

Each team will start with $100 auction dollars.  Each week the team with the
lowest total points year to date will get $12 added back to their total, the
team with the highest YTD pt total will get $1 added back and teams in the
middle will get their according dollar amount based on their rank in YTD pts.

ALL TRADES WILL BE ASSESSED A $5.00 flat fee.

Also, let me know how you want to handle dues (a total of $110).  Should I
collect them up front ?

-the commish


---------------------- Forwarded by Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron on 04/04/2001
11:28 AM ---------------------------

"Hapner, Dede" <DXH4@pge.com> on 04/04/2001 11:16:37 AM
To: "'rshapiro@enron.com'" <rshapiro@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: FW: Calif Gov To Make 'Important' Energy Announcement Thurs

>  -----Original Message-----
> From:    Luo, Jay
> Sent:   Wednesday, April 04, 2001 8:05 AM
> To:   RRQ Revenue Requirements Department
> Cc:   Hapner, Dede
> Subject:   Calif Gov To Make 'Important' Energy Announcement Thurs
>
> Calif Gov To Make 'Important' Energy Announcement Thurs
> LOS ANGELES (Dow Jones)--In a highly unusual move, California Gov. Gray
> Davis Tuesday requested radio and television stations in the state to
> clear five minutes of time Thursday evening so he can make an important
> announcement regarding the state's energy crisis.
> Davis is expected to deliver a speech at 6:05 p.m. PST and will likely
> talk about the state's conservation efforts, a 4,000 megawatt shortfall
> expected next month, the need to bring new generation online, recent rate
> hikes ordered by the California Public Utilities Commission, and the
> possibility for further rate increases this summer to keep the state's
> three investor-owned utilities solvent, sources close to Davis told Dow
> Jones Newswires.
> The source said Davis is not expected to discuss a final agreement to buy
> the power lines owned by PG&E Corp., unit Pacific Gas & Electric, Edison
> International's unit, Southern California Edison, and Sempra Energy's
> unit, San Diego Gas & Electric.
> Davis' press secretary, Steve Maviglio, would not comment on Davis'
> speech.
> In a memo to the media, Davis' office said the governor will "deliver an
> important live address on energy from his office in Sacramento. During
> this historic address to the people of California, the governor will speak
> in detail about California's energy emergency and make an important
> announcement."
> The last time a California governor interrupted a broadcast schedules was
> in 1992, when Republican Gov. Pete Wilson delivered a speech about the
> state's budget problems, a spokesman in Davis' office said.
> But Davis' staff said "this is the first time in recent memory that a
> Governor has asked for time statewide to deliver a live address to the
> people of California."
> -By Jason Leopold; Dow Jones Newswires; 323-658-3874;
>


Please find below the weekly project status update of GTV and the attached file for the updated project timeline. Changes were underlined.

GTV status meeting attendees:  Zhiyong Wei, Jeremy Wong, Nayan Dattani, Bill Fortney, Karima Husain, Chuck Ames, Geoff Storey, Jay Krish, Jeff Gossett, Russ Severson.

Accomplishments:
?	Incorporating physical deal positions in TDS:
o	Changes for the view aggregation have been completed.
o	Expandable Total in Cash Position has been completed.
?	Single point of deal entry for term deals:
o	Released to production.
?	Gas Daily deals:
o	Released to production.
?	Live feeds for Gas Daily/intra-month curves:
o	Released to production.
?	Saving different views in TDS:
o	Completed.
?	Capability for desk roll-ups on an ad hoc basis (phase 2, on hold since 7/9/01):
o	New process for roll-up aggregators has been completed.
?	Option Grid (phase 2):
o	Released to production.
?	Gas Daily options (phase 2):
o	Released to production.
?	Basis Options (phase 2):
o	Development of deal entry type for Basis Options has been completed in TAGG.
o	Development of loading correlation curves has been completed.
o	Changes to the Translator have been completed.
?	Transport Deal Capture & Valuation (phase 2):
o	Creation of new deal entry type & database changes has been completed.
o	Changes to the Translator have been completed.

Plans for the week ending 7/27/01:
?	Continue IT development of Phase I items.
o	User acceptance test of physical deal positions in TDS.
?	Continue IT development of Phase II issues.
o	Change PortCalc to value spread options.
o	Option reports (PL reports).
?	New flexible deal viewer.
o	Database schema design.
o	GUI development.
?	Add more information to the drill-down deal details.
o	Continue development.

Issues:
None

Notes
?	The Calgary office is not able to use the new GDI calc for their Gas Daily books due to their current curve structure. New indexes were suggested for the GDI calc for Canadian Gas Daily books.

Thanks

Zhiyong


Hi how are you doing?  I have a meeting from 4 to 5, do you mind waiting for me?  Thanks.

John

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Villarreal, Alexandra
Sent:	Monday, October 22, 2001 3:48 PM
To:	Griffith, John
Subject:

hello


---------------------- Forwarded by Mike Carson/Corp/Enron on 09/08/2000
10:08 AM ---------------------------

Mike Carson
08/04/2000 10:22 AM
To: goodmand@kochind.com, meridetk@kochind.com, Trpape@aol.com,
tpape@satake-usa.com
cc:

Subject: Baby Party/Shower

Some friends of my wife and I are throwing a little bash on the evening of
September 9th for my upcoming baby BOY.   I would like to invite you all to
attend.  I believe there will be a margarita machine....

If you want to come,, please reply by sending me your address.  You will then
recieve an invitation by mail.

Hope to see you there,,

Mike


Shane,
Laurel and I met with Sara Shackleton, Legal,  yesterday.

Sara provided the following updates for Australia ISDA Agreements:
National Australia Bank  Exectued 1/3/2000 on our side, received executed
back from them 3/3/2000
West Pac   Our end done, sent to them.  Susan Flynn to follow-up to id where
in process currently.
ANZ Bank   We need to know the exact name of the entity we want the agreement
with so we can apply to the credit group  to approve getting      an
agreement in place.
Thanks. Sheila


Thanks for getting him to call me, been great help in outlining what u need and when..   Will revert to the both of u towards end of week.

Tks MKF


Rick and Elizabeth:

Below are my budget spreadsheet scenarios for EIM, EGM and ENW.  I have broken the budgets down by business unit.  Let me know if you have any questions.

Lisa


Please contact Craig Breslau.  I did not do any deals with Equistar, he did.

	From:  Robert E Lloyd                           07/14/2000 09:29 AM

To: Lee L Papayoti/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Anita Luong/HOU/ECT@ECT, Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Settelement Request for an Equistar "Buyback" ticket with ENA as
Shipper

 Daren wanted me to make this request to you for an Equistar Buyback Ticket
on Enron North America{ENA}.

 Equistar has nominated activity on ENA for June and July 2000 production.

 Settlement seems to think a Buyback ticket is necessary to properly account
for Equistar's monthly activity.


Please be advised that I will not be available for a conference call on the morning of November 2.  Thanks.


Folks,

We are scheduling interviews for candidates for the ENA Trading Track on Thursday.   We have 10 external candidates interviewing and we would like your support to mix and mingle with them over an informal lunch at 12:45pm in Room EB42C.

Please let me know if you can attend.

Regards,

Karen
x54667


britt,

thanks your reply which is noted. you will notice i have excluded david best
and ngregson (?) preferring to keep my comments in house as privileged info,
unless you feel this msg should be forwarded to them later.

firstly, i am getting nowhere with mitsubishi on the settlement front. i have
gone so far as to mention this morning to mitsuru that if this does goes to
arbitration, and should mitsubishi succeed in their position, this will only
serve to increase our claim by a similar amount since these costs would then
become part of our contamination claim. he seems quite content to let this go
to arbitration. as an example, he was suppose to call me back this afternoon
but did not.

secondly, with regards to your comments, i would just respond/add the
following information:

1. i don't know if i am switching tactics so much as following what should
have been done in the beginning (i.e. submit the claim to our insurance
company and let them proceed against the owners). i honestly feel the
arbitrators will say, "pay the freight (and possibly the demurrage now) and
settle the contamination claim as a separate issue". clearly, the c/p says
that freight is due without deduction once the vessel has completed discharge.

on the issue of the "pre-sale" survey, i have discussed this matter
internally with eric tan. seems our position is that singapore considered the
sample that was drawn as a bad sample as well as we were not sure that the
test methods used conformed with the testing methods required for first gas.
this position is proved by the loading of the pacific virgo when the product
subsequently tested on-spec for first gas. granted, it might still become an
issue but, as you say. it could become an issue in either proceeding.

i am getting a little confused on the matter of the joint testing. verbally i
was advised that enron did not want to have the joint testing - at least not
on a prompt basis. your msg now says that we do want to test the product and
it should be done as soon as possible (as mitsubishi - and your advices that
the underwriters and hear owner's p and i club would want). i assume this
change is the result of the arbitration.

be that as it may, i do have a bit of information that you may, or may not,
be aware of or find relevant. when eric tan and i visited first gas in
mid-oct to meet the personnel at first gas and witness one of the cargoes
being discharged at the plant, we also took the opportunity to meet with sgs
in subic bay to see their facilities and meet their personnel. during the
conversation the subject of the elang cargo came up and the comment from sgs
is that they were fairly certain it was off-spec due to "bugs". this may
sound silly but i have heard of this before and is a problem with petroleum
products.

it seems sgs even went so far as to test the product themselves for these
"bugs" and got a positive result. this test was not requested by enron or
first gas and was done some time later in this process. i understand there
may be some concern on our part over our subsequent sales to third parties if
we knew there were bugs in the product. i would have to say that this was not
known at the time and even today is only conjecture based on sgs' advices
mid-oct (well after these sales). sgs also described "changes" to the product
which would fit with the cargo having bugs (i.e. a strong sulphur smell and
change in colour).

if the testing is now done, i do not know if these bugs will be detected or
not. however, if they are in the ship's samples, they may have changed the
sample sufficiently that even a visual observation may detect the problem.
the next problem becomes proving from where the bugs originated. were they in
the previous cargo tanks that were not cleaned properly? or were they in the
condensate when the cargo was loaded? obviously, testing of the shore sample
prior to loading will determine the answer. if the shore sample is ok, then
they had to come from the ship. if the shore sample also has bugs, then we
should be claiming against our suppliers.

this of course assumes the suggestion put forth by sgs is in fact correct.
just something else to be considered.

2) i am not saying that we pay the full amount immediately but only the
freight portion (about $500,000). we then advise mitsubishi (or their
lawyers) that we will now review the demurrage claim (about $260,000) and
revert by say end nov. the demurrage claim has been sent to our london
office's demurrage department and i have asked them for their comments on the
claim. after all, there may be issues with the ship's pumping performance or
simple laytime errors which may reduce the demurrage claim. they will try to
get me a response before the weekend.

in this manner, we pay part of the money but still have a smaller portion
which we may apply against our claim once the test results are known. i will
leave this to legal as to decide how the approach to mitsubishi or their
lawyers should be made

rgds


-----Original Message-----
From: Fairchild, Tracy [mailto:tracy.fairchild@edelman.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2001 6:12 PM
To: Allen, Stevan; arem@electric.com; Bob_Anderson@apses.com;
brbarkovich@earthlink.net; Britton McFetridge; cra@calretailers.com;
Dave Modisette; dennis.flatt@kp.org; dhunter@s-k-w.com; Dian Grueneich;
djsmith@s-k-w.com; Dominic.DiMare@calchamber.com; drothrock@cmta.net;
Fairchild, Tracy; gdoar@newpower.com; gharrison@calstate.edu;
hgovenar@govadv.com; jackson_gualco@gualcogroup.com; James Simonelli;
Janie Mollon; jerryl@abag.ca.gov; .gov@mailman.enron.com;
johnlatimer@capitoladvocacy.com; Julee Ball; ken_pietrelli@ocli.com;
kgough@calpine.com; kmccrea@sablaw.com; kmills@cfbf.com;
lhastings@cagrocers.com; Manuel, Erica; Margaret Catzen; mday@gmssr.com;
mmoretti@calhealth.org; nplotkin@rcsis.com; Paul Bauer;
randy_britt@robinsonsmay.com; richard.seguin@kp.org; RochmanM@spurr.org;
rrichter@calhealth.org; sgovenar@govadv.com; smccubbi@enron.com;
spahnn@hnks.com; sschleimer@calpine.com; vincent.stewart@ucop.edu;
vjw@ceert.org; Warner, Jami; wbooth@booth-law.com; wbrown@lhom.com;
wlarson@calstate.edu
Subject: Urgent: Revised Letter to Angelides et al

DAC members,

You should find that the attached letter incorporates the changes that we
agreed to on today's conference call.  Please notify me immediately if any
of the content is a problem for you.  Please note that I have listed ALL
members of the DAC as signatories to the letter.  The final thing I need
from you is emailed approval from each of your orgs to send the document
with your group listed on it.
If you do not want your organization listed on this letter, or if I have
inadvertently left yours off, please let me know ASAP.  Edelman plans to
disseminate the letter by COB tomorrow.  Thanks for your prompt attention to
this.

Tracy Fairchild
Senior Account Supervisor
Edelman Public Relations Worldwide
tracy.fairchild@edelman.com
(916) 442-2331
(916) 447-8509 (fax)

 <<DAC letter to Angelides et al 080901.doc>>


Your eRequest's password is 6783
To use this password, go to the eRequest website and click on non-Corp logon.
Put in your email address and the password above and click Log In, and you
will log into eRequest.


---------------------- Forwarded by Nicholas O'Day/AP/Enron on 09/20/2000
05:24 PM ---------------------------

Nicholas O'Day
09/20/2000 05:22 PM
To: Mark Schroeder/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Steven J Kean/HOU/EES@EES

Subject: Enron Japan website

Mark,

As foreshadowed last week, we gave a presentation to Mark Palmer this morning
on the proposed Enron Japan website. Mark will be briefing Steve Kean
tomorrow. We ran through a few background slides set out in the presentation
and then went through the development site - dev.enron.co.jp. A copy of the
presentation is attached.

In broad terms, we covered the following:

Why we are building the site
Who we are targeting
Reinforced that the site is commercially focused -  not brochure ware
Reinforced that the amount of material on the site is manageable and that we
had procedures in place to regularly update the site
Sought ongoing support for new material.

I attach first drafts of articles which we propose including in the
regulatory section . You can also view these articles in draft on the
website  -  entry via the homepage pictures or in the Japan Market page.

 We clearly need to conform the graphs and recheck the facts and figures with
a fine tooth comb. With that in mind, I would welcome your input on the
content and the list of proposed future articles - set out on page 8 of the
presentation.

We are proposing to have the website up and running by mid October with a
view to launching the site to the public on 31 October, the date of the
office opening. Between now and then we need to tidy up the drafts, translate
them and then get sign off from PR, legal and Enron's web master.

I will try to give you a call  later today to briefly discuss.

kind regards


Market Participants and Schedule Coordinators,

  Please be advised that all Supplemental Energy bids
(including imports and exports) submitted to the ISO for use in the
real-time Imbalance Energy Market are considered to be "FIRM" (i.e., the
bids cannot be withdrawn after 45 minutes prior to the Settlement Period and
can be dispatched by the ISO anytime during the Settlement Period, see - ISO
Tariff o 2.5.22.4.1).

  Any bids labeled as "Non- Firm" or reported to the CAISO
real-time scheduler as "Non-Firm" or recallable will be rejected.  The CAISO
does not carry the necessary excess reserves to support "Non-Firm"
Supplemental Imports.

  If there are any questions concerning this practice please
contact Brian Rahman at 916-608-5883.

Brian S. Rahman P.E.
Manager of Markets - California ISO
Phone (916) 608-5883
Pager (916) 814-0614


Good morning Norberto:

Enron Corp. Research would like you to come in for an informal interview
Friday, May 5, beginning at 1:30 pm.  Following is a tentative schedule:

Vasant Shanbhogue  1:30 PM
Vince Kaminski  1:45 PM
Clayton Vernon  2:00 PM
Stinson Gibner  2:15 PM
Tanya Tamarchenko  2:30 PM
Grant Masson   2:45 PM

Please let me know if these times work for you.

Thank you!

Shirley Crenshaw
713-853-5290


------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
W E E K E N D   S Y S T E M S   A V A I L A B I L I T Y

F O R

November 21, 2001 5:00pm through November 26, 2001 12:00am
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

SCHEDULED SYSTEM OUTAGES:

ARDMORE DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages.

AZURIX: No Scheduled Outages.

EB34 DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages.

EDI SERVER: No Scheduled Outages.

EES:
Impact:  EES
Time:  Sat 11/24/2001 at  10:30:00 PM CT thru Sun 11/25/2001 at  6:30:00 AM CT
	Sat 11/24/2001 at    8:30:00 PM PT thru Sun 11/25/2001 at  4:30:00 AM PT
	Sun 11/25/2001 at  4:30:00 AM London thru Sun 11/25/2001 at  12:30:00 PM London
Outage:  EESHOU-FS2 "R" drive migration outage
Environments Impacted:  EES
Purpose: migration of "R" drive to larger disk space
Backout: restore from backup
Contact(s): 	Mark Jordan             713-562-4247
		Roderic H Gerlach  713-345-3077
		Jeff Hughes              713-345-8809
		Tom Novark              713-345-4962

ENRON CENTER SOUTH DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages

ENRON NORTH AMERICAN LANS:  No Scheduled Outages.

FIELD SERVICES:  No Scheduled Outages.

INTERNET: No Scheduled Outages.

MESSAGING:
Impact:  nahou-msmbx01p and 02p
Time:  Wed 11/21/2001 at  7:00:00 PM CT  thru Wed 11/21/2001 at  7:30:00 PM CT
	Wed 11/21/2001 at  5:00:00 PM PT thru Wed 11/21/2001 at  5:30:00 PM PT
	Thur 11/22/2001 at  1:00:00 AM London thru Thur 11/22/2001 at  1:30:00 AM
Outage:  nahou-msdog01v
Environments Impacted:  Messaging Team
Purpose: Need to make sure the hotfix works on a production box.
Backout: remove EXifs.sys and replace with the previous version.
Contact(s): 	David Lin    713-345-1619

MARKET DATA: No Scheduled Outages.

NT: No Scheduled Outages.

OS/2:  No Scheduled Outages.

OTHER:
Impact:  ENPOWER Application
Time:  Sat 11/24/2001 at  10:00:00 AM CT thru Sun 11/25/2001 at  6:00:00 PM CT
	Sat 11/24/2001 a     8:00:00 AM PT thru Sun 11/25/2001 at  4:00:00 PM PT
	Sat 11/24/2001 at  4:00:00 PM London thru Mon 11/26/2001 at  12:00:00 AM London
Outage:  PWRPROD1 Maintenance
Environments Impacted:  EnPower Users
Purpose: Maintenance of database objects. Increase efficiency of space utilization and query performance of the EnPower system.
Backout: Revert to backed-up copies of objects (All will be backed-up prior to each re-org)
Contact(s): 	Michael Berger  713-345-3190  281-960-5571
		Oracle On-Call DBA  N/A  888-993-3793
		Charles Brewer  713-345-4868  281-960-7066
		Tantra Invedy  713-853-4304  281-960-7184

Impact: Corp
Time:   Thur 11/22/2001 at  6:00:00 AM CT thru Fri 11/23/2001 at  12:00:00 AM CT
	Thur 11/22/2001 at  4:00:00 AM PT thru Thur 11/22/2001 at 10:00:00 PM PT
	Thur  11/22/2001 at  12:00:00 PM London thru Fri 11/23/2001 at  6:00:00 AM London
Outage: Test / Dev disk re layouts, server Croaker
Environments Impacted: Custom Logs (CEI), EnPower, Equities, ERP/TRV, Estreme Relocation, Etalk, Government Affairs, Infinity, ITOPS, IZZIE, OMS (Yantra), RMS, SIEBEL, WEBMODAL, REMEDY
Purpose: Migrate to the new more efficient disk layout with enhanced performance now that testing is complete.
Backout: Restore original disklayout. Restore data from backup storage.
Contact(s):  Dolan, Michael713-345-3251
                   Wells, Malcolm713-345-3716

Impact: Corp
Time:   Thur 11/22/2001 at  6:00:00 AM CT thru Fri 11/23/2001 at  12:00:00 AM CT
	Thur 11/22/2001 at  4:00:00 AM PT thru Thur 11/22/2001 at 10:00:00 PM PT
	Thur  11/22/2001 at  12:00:00 PM London thru Fri 11/23/2001 at  6:00:00 AM London
Outage: Test/Dev maintenance weekend, server Salmon
Environments Impacted: CAS, CPR, DCAF-2, ECM, EIM, Global, Infinity, MKM, PEP, POPS
Purpose: Migrate to the new more efficient disk layout with enhanced performance now that testing is complete.
Backout: Restore original disklayout. Restore data from backup storage.
Contact(s):  Dolan, Michael713-345-3251
                    Wells, Malcolm713-345-3716

Impact: Corp
Time: Thur 11/22/2001 at  6:00:00 AM CT thru Fri 11/23/2001 at  12:00:00 AM CT
	Thur 11/22/2001 at  4:00:00 AM PT thru Thur 11/22/2001 at 10:00:00 PM PT
	Thur  11/22/2001 at  12:00:00 PM London thru Fri 11/23/2001 at  6:00:00 AM London
Outage: Test / Dev disk re layouts, Server Charon
Environments Impacted: OPM, EnLighten, RAM
Purpose: Migrate to the new more efficient disk layout with enhanced performance now that testing is complete.
Backout: Restore original disklayout. Restore data from backup storage.
Contact(s):  Dolan, Michael713-345-3251
                   Wells, Malcolm713-345-3716

Impact: Corp
Time: Sat 11/24/2001 06:00 PM thru Sun 11/25/2001 6:00 AM CT
           Sat 11/24/2001 04:00 PM thru Sun 11/25/2001 4:00 AM PT
           Sun 11/25/2001 00:00 AM thru Sun 11/25/2001 12:00 PM London
Outage: Test / Dev disk re layouts, server Ferrari
Environments Impacted: CPR,EnPower, OMS (Yantra), Power-Exotic, SIEBEL, POPS
Purpose: Migrate to the new more efficient disk layout with enhanced performance now that testing is complete.
Backout: Restore original disklayout. Restore data from backup storage.
Contact(s):  Dolan, Michael713-345-3251
                    Wells, Malcolm713-345-3716

Impact: Corp
Time: Sat 11/24/2001 06:00 PM thru Sun 11/25/2001 6:00 AM CT
           Sat 11/24/2001 04:00 PM thru Sun 11/25/2001 4:00 AM PT
           Sun 11/25/2001 00:00 AM thru Sun 11/25/2001 12:00 PM London
Outage: Test / Dev disk re layouts for astral
Environments Impacted: DCAF3, EQUITIES, Phoenix, RMS, SITARA - OLTP, Infinity, ECM
Purpose: Migrate to the new more efficient disk layout with enhanced performance now that testing is complete.
Backout: Restore original disklayout. Restore data from backup storage.
Contact(s):  Dolan, Michael713-345-3251
                    Wells, Malcolm713-345-3716

Impact: Corp
Time: Sat 11/24/2001 06:00 PM thru Sun 11/25/2001 6:00 AM CT
           Sat 11/24/2001 04:00 PM thru Sun 11/25/2001 4:00 AM PT
           Sun 11/25/2001 00:00 AM thru Sun 11/25/2001 12:00 PM London
Outage: Test / Dev disk re layouts for titania
Environments Impacted: CAS, Custom Logs (CEI), Equities, Estreme Relocation, Global, Government Affairs, POPS, SIEBEL
Purpose: Migrate to the new more efficient disk layout with enhanced performance now that testing is complete.
Backout: Restore original disklayout. Restore data from backup storage.
Contact(s):  Dolan, Michael713-345-3251
                    Wells, Malcolm713-345-3716

SITARA:  No Scheduled Outages.

SUN/OSS SYSTEM: No Scheduled Outages.

TELEPHONY: No Scheduled Outages

TERMINAL SERVER:  No Scheduled Outages.

UNIFY:  No Scheduled Outages.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
								FOR ASSISTANCE

(713) 853-1411   Enron Resolution Center

Specific Help:
Information Risk Management			(713) 853-5536
SAP/ISC                                                                               (713) 345-4727
Unify On-Call 					(713) 284-3757  [Pager]
Sitara On-Call					(713) 288-0101  [Pager]
RUS/GOPS/GeoTools/APRS			(713) 639-9726  [Pager]
OSS/UA4/TARP				(713) 285-3165  [Pager]
CPR						(713) 284-4175  [Pager]
EDI Support 					(713) 327-3893  [Pager]
EES Help Desk					(713)853-9797 OR (888)853-9797
TDS -Trader Decision Support On-Call                    (713) 327-6032 [Pager]


-----Original Message-----
From: Heizenrader, Tim
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 8:55 AM
To: Semperger, Cara
Subject: Another Idea


London is very pleased with the speech.  Thanks it was a great idea to
prepare the presentation.   Both Mike Hutchinson and Mike Farmer were very
please.

Thanks,

Maureen

---------------------- Forwarded by Maureen Raymond/HOU/ECT on 11/09/2000
06:44 AM ---------------------------

Maria Abello
11/09/2000 03:20 AM
To: Maureen Raymond/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Kirsten Ross/LON/ECT@ECT
Subject: Lunch Presentation

Hi Maureen,

Thanks very much for presenting yesterday. Your presentation created much
interest and as always we look forward to your return to London office for
another talk.  The viewing statistics on IPTV were excellent and are as
follows:

Current: 85
Cumulative: 110

I have spoken to the audio visual team regarding the possibility of showing
your presenting on IPTV in Houston. It will take a couple of days to encode
the videotape, but as soon as this done, I will send a copy to you in
Houston. They are also looking send the file to the relevant person in
Houston so they can put in on IPTV.

If you have any questions at all, please do not hesitate to call me.

Kind regards and thanks again
Maria Abello
European Training and Development
Enron Europe Ltd
email: maria.abello@enron.com
+44 (0) 207 783 4787


Well, I was clearly too ambitious in setting out the schedule.  My
apologies.  I managed to trudge through the reading and the document last
night, but didn't not get to answering the question.  I appears that this
will be a busy weekend.  I've a feeling that I won't get my proposed answer
to folks until Saturday afternoon for your review.  If that poses a problem
for anyone, please let me know.  I still intend to be the compiler of wisdom,
so folks should feel free to distribute when they've got something drafted.

Best,
Jeff


I have a customer that would like to be set up on Enron Online.  He is a
wimby and under our contract with him, he will back to back each trade with
public Service Company of colorado.  In other words, he doesn't have his own
credit.  Could you set him up, at least with a temporary password?  His info
is as follows:

Sandia Resources
Jerry Padilla
jerrypadilla@msn.com
303-332-9725

Let me know if you have any questions.  And please let me know when you send
him a password.

Thanks,

Kim Ward
Portland


Operations Kickoff meeting for Contracts & Capacity Release


---------------------- Forwarded by Kayne Coulter/HOU/ECT on 08/29/2000 03:14
PM ---------------------------

Steve Olinde@ENRON
08/29/2000 02:58 PM
To: Brent Hebert/HOU/ECT@ect, Keith Comeaux/Corp/Enron@Enron, Chris
Lenartowicz/Corp/Enron@ENRON, George Diaz/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Justin
Laverell/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kayne Coulter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lloyd Will/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Mitch Robinson/Corp/Enron@Enron, Richard Broussard/Corp/Enron@Enron,
Christopher Watts/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Transfer an incoming call to " Voice Mail "

The procedure to connect an incoming call to " Voice Mail "

1)  If you pick up a call on someone's line, and the person calling request
to be connected to Voice Mail:

      A)   Press the " T "  transfer  button.
      B)   Press * 99

     The caller is now connected to Voice mail.

2)  If a person calls on a line other than the employees  line and is
requesting to be connected to their Voice Mail :

     A)   Press the " T " transfer button.
     B)   Dial 57001 and the employees extension number.
     C)   Press the release button.

     The caller is now connected to Voice Mail.


This warning is sent automatically to inform you that your mailbox is approaching the maximum size limit.
Your mailbox size is currently 109135 KB.

Mailbox size limits:

	When your mailbox reaches 75000 KB you will receive this message.
	When your mailbox reaches 100000 KB you will no longer be able to send mail until the size of your mailbox is reduced.

To check the size of your mailbox:

  Right-click the mailbox (Outlook Today),
  Select Properties and click the Folder Size button.
  This method can be used on individual folders as well.

To make more space available, delete any items that are no longer needed such as Sent Items and Journal entries.

You must empty the Deleted Items folder after deleting items or the space will not be freed.

To turn Journaling off,
 click Tools | Options | Journaling Options and de-select all items.

See client Help for more information.


Looks good.  I wouldn't stress the MOU, but would rather focus on the
"melding" of alot of good ideas.  The Investigation concession comes from
whom?

Jim

From: Jeff Dasovich on 05/07/2001 09:22 AM
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
To: skean@enron.com, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Janel Guerrero/Corp/Enron@Enron, Karen
Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan J
Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Scott Bolton/Enron Communications@Enron Communications,
Susan M Landwehr/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul Kaufman/Enron@EnronXGate
cc:

Subject: Friday ReCap

Folks:  Let me know if this captures the results of the conversation on
Friday.

Best,
Jeff
******************************************************************************
*********************************************
Basics of Proposal
Something akin to the MOU (that adequately addresses the solvency issue, for
the IOUs, the State and QFs), but WITHOUT the transmission component
Direct Access for ALL customers, transitioning to a core/noncore market
structure in 18-24 months (this can be accomplished without stranding CDWR's
contracts)
Concessions
 -IOUs (MOU modifications)
 -Generators (past due amounts)
 -investigations
Package to finance the deal (bond issuance backed by rate increases to permit
securitization)

Message
This is the last best chance to achieve a comprehensive settlement
We have developed a comprehensive solution and are meeting with everyone that
will see us.
We have thus far received positive feedback on and a willingness to work with
our proposal
We intend to work tirelelessly to gain support for a total solution---it's
vital, and time's running out

Media Strategy---Karen Denne

Corporate leader strategy---Karen Denne

Meetings with legislators in Sacramento---Sandi McCubbin

WPTF, IEP, ARM---Sue Mara

Large customers---Jeff Dasovich


Are you moving floors or just moving around on 31?  I don't want a lump of
coal from you at Christmas.

Janel Guerrero@ENRON
05/03/2000 04:03 PM
To: Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: gossip

Well, it looks like I'm headed over to the coal group.  They called me up
after lunch and it's all just a matter of time.  (I actually think the coal
group cares more about emissions than power, so this might be better after
all).  Anyway, it appears pretty close to being a done deal.  Barring any
unforseen glitches, I should be up there in the next week or so.

Have fun in Mexico!


Dear Rocky,
Sorry that I missed the get together at SMU last month, but from the
looks of the photos I've seen, a good time was had by all. Hope this
finds you healthy and doing well. My wife and I had dinner last night
with Tom and Betsy McSoley, and your name came up in conversation while
talking about the reunion. I wanted to touch base with you with a
possible business start up idea that may fit into the types of online
services you offer with Enron. We are currently developing an online
licensing agency for the illustration and photographic markets, and I
would like to share the idea and our business plan with you to see if
there is any interest in what promises to be a growing marketplace.
While some companies are currently involved in the photographic end of
this business environment (GettyImages, Corbis), we feel we have a
competitive advantage in that our management team consists of some of
the top illustrators in the field as well as two of the best
intellectual attorneys in the country. We currently have 250 artists and
their collective body of work signed up, and are now in the capital
raising stage, with a launch date of June 2001. I'd love the opportunity
to talk with you further if you think this might be of interest to you.
When time permits, please give me a call at 317 253 3141 and I'd be
happy to share more with you at that time. Thanks for giving this your
consideration Rocky, and I look forward to hearing from you soon.
Kai
Dave Lesh


Attached is the tasking letter based on the scope of work you provided.
Please let me know if you have any questions.


Chris,

Whalley will be on vacation all next week and I'll need to fax him copies of
the P&Ls.  Please deliver to me print outs of the Gas & Power P&Ls for the
week of February 14.

Many Thanks,

Liz Taylor
x31935
EB3322


Please decide who should be assigned to this counterparty and add to Lotus
Notes.  It's a Top Ten and we need to follow up.  Thanks.  Sara


The title transfer fee is much like Michcon's in that if you move gas from
one marketer to another such as Columbia Energy Services to TXU instead of
nominating directly to the end user themselves they charge you a title
transfer fee.  TXU is the agent for Dahlmer Chrysler who is CES' end user
customer.  Therefore if Columbia were able to nominate from their pool
DIRECTLY to Dahlmer Chysler  they would not be charged the title transfer
fee.   However since TXU is there agent and CES has to nominate to TXU
(marketer to marketer) they are charge the fee.


Focusing the right people on the right issues is always a good idea.  I would
like to visit with you to understand what you mean by "operational issues".
My team has a meeting every other Monday focused on operational risk and we
have various working groups that focus on key projects or initiatives that
vary with need.  A daily meeting on operational issues would need to have the
appropriate team members there, and I hesitate to add an additional meeting
to any key folks on my team if operational projects/initiatives are being
covered either in our Monday operational risk meeting or in another forum.
--Sally

From: Rick Buy/ENRON@enronXgate on 04/23/2001 04:55 PM
To: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, David
Port/ENRON@enronXgate, David Hardy/LON/ECT@ECT, Shona Wilson/NA/Enron@Enron,
William S Bradford/ENRON@enronXgate
cc: Ted Murphy/LON/ECT@ECT, Richard Causey/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Operational Issues

I think the daily IT issue meeting has been quite successful in addressing
problems in systems and working toward resolution on systems related issues.
I would like to expand the scope of this meeting to include daily operational
issues as well.

I plan on restarting my attendance at these meetings on Wednesday. Can the
RAC people listed above please make a start at some of the recurring issues.

Thanks, Rick


-----Original Message-----
From: Webb, Jay
Sent: Saturday, January 12, 2002 12:01 PM
To: Kitchen, Louise
Subject: Cuts

Hi Louise,

I asked each of my directs to consider 3 levels of cuts.  I told them this is strictly an exercise at this point and that we haven't been given targets (trying to keep the emotion down).  The three levels were:

 A. Remove capability for new projects but retain a reasonable ability to continue growth of our current application suite.

 B. Reduce to minimal development capability.  Retain ability for operations and minor enhancements to applications.

 C. Cut to life-support level.  Retain ability to operate the applications and fix bugs.

The cut levels are as follows:
A. Reduce by 11 (to 129)
B. Reduce by 21 (to 108)
C. Reduce by 17 (to 91)

Jeff Johnson placed himself in the A cuts, though I removed him from that cut thinking I can talk him out of it.  He is in the B cut.

Steve Stock placed himself in the B cuts.

Michael Guadarrama placed himself in the B cuts.  He said he would probably leave if the A cuts were made but would wait until we got through the transition.

Hopefully we can hold this together.

I'll try to call you to discuss.

Thanks.
--jay

Jay Webb


it's been changed.

Stephanie Piwetz   03/30/2001 11:07 AM

To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: Deal 562195.01

Kate, can you please correct the fee for del 562195.01,  to .0275

THanks
Sp


Start Date: 4/19/01; HourAhead hour: 6;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No
variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041906.txt

---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ----
*** Final schedule not found for preferred schedule.
     Details:

  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTRT
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/19/01
  TIE_POINT: FCORNR_5_PSUEDO
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_DESERT
  ENGY_TYPE: FIRM


Tanya:  Based upon our earlier conversation, I will begin preparing masters
for the following parties with (1) no CSA, (2) bilateral cross-default at
US$100 million and (3) uncapped (or min US$100 million cap) guaranties for
counterparties required to post guaranties.  The parties on Clint's list are:

(1)  Lehman Brothers Finance S.A. [have form of master and a form of guaranty
from Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.] - Stephanie Panus

(2)  Credit Suisse First Boston International [no form of master]

(3)  Deutsche Bank [have a form of master from ENA negotiations]

(4)  Bear Stearns International Limited [no form of master] - Samantha Boyd

(5)  Morgan Stanley Capital Services Inc. [may develop form from ENA
negotiations]

(6)  Credit Agricole Indosuez

Tanya:  Please let me know if any of the foregoing require parent guaranties.

Clint:  Please identify the lawyer to whom I should address comments.  Also,
are there any others?  ENE has an agreement with Toronto Dominion, NY Branch.

Samantha:  Please assign Credit Suisse and Deutsche Bank and let me know who
is handling.


It's no coinicidence that there're three I's in polItIcIan. What, you live
in Sacramento now? When're we going to play?

>From: Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com
>To: eldon@direcpc.com, psellers@Haas.Berkeley.EDU, cameron@perfect.com,
>scottwl@hotmail.com
>Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2001 12:03:33 -0500
>
>Dan Walters: Davis plays in a virtual world while the energy reality
>continues
>
>
>(Published July 11, 2001)
>
>
>California still has a very real and very severe energy crisis, to wit:
>
>
>(Embedded image moved to file: pic08526.gif)The state is still running up
>massive debts as it pays more for power than it can recover from ratepayers
>and is having trouble borrowing billions of dollars to cover the debt.
>
>
>(Embedded image moved to file: pic13357.gif)There is a strong possibility,
>perhaps a probability, that when summer's heat truly descends, there will
>be severe power blackouts as air conditioners demand more juice than
>California can generate or buy.
>
>
>(Embedded image moved to file: pic29337.gif)One major utility, Pacific Gas
>and Electric, has filed for bankruptcy protection and a second, Southern
>California Edison, is on the brink of joining it.
>
>
>There is, however, a virtual energy crisis consisting of political spin,
>media leaks and made-for-television buzz words -- and it is rapidly
>becoming dominant, while the real situation fades into the background.
>
>
>This week's comic opera proceedings before a Federal Energy Regulatory
>Commission administrative judge in Washington had little to do with reality
>and everything to do with the virtual version.
>
>
>Gov. Gray Davis and other officials demanded $8.9 billion in refunds from
>the generators and brokers who have been selling California power for the
>past year, alleging that California is, in Davis' words, "being gouged and
>ripped off." But the number itself was more or less plucked out of thin air
>-- an arithmetic exercise by the state power grid's traffic controller not
>intended for a refund proceeding. And while Judge Curtis Wagner saw it as
>unrealistic, Davis and other state officials insisted on its validity.
>
>
>"There are refunds due that total hundreds of millions of dollars and maybe
>a billion dollars," Wagner said as a final negotiating session collapsed.
>But that's a far cry from the $8.9 billion that Davis insists is due. "If
>you think California is going to settle for $1 billion in refunds, we will
>see you in court," Davis said Tuesday.
>
>
>Why is Davis being so belligerent? Because it's good politics. Ever since
>he began berating out-of-state generators and accusing them of ripping off
>California, Davis' approval ratings have been climbing. If he settled for
>substantially less -- the power generators probably would agree to a couple
>of billion dollars to rid themselves of the matter -- Davis would be
>embarrassed. Politically, he's served by continuing to portray himself as
>fighting for California and against the out-of-state generators.
>
>
>That it's more political construct than reality is indicated by another
>event this week, Davis' release of state power purchase data from early in
>the year -- numbers that were made public only because a judge told him he
>had to do it.
>
>
>Davis and his minions have been accusing Texas-based generators and power
>brokers of particularly egregious price gouging -- clearly playing on
>Californians' instinctive mistrust of anything Texan and implying that
>Texan George W. Bush is a co-conspirator. But the power purchase records --
>which were released only to journalists willing to pay a stiff fee --
>indicate that less than 10 percent of California's power purchase dollars
>were going to Texas and the private sellers, in general, charged the state
>less than such publicly owned utilities as the Los Angeles Department of
>Water and Power.
>
>
>The clearly adverse position being taken by FERC and the purchase data that
>undercut his jingoistic sloganeering are not, however, deterring Davis from
>continuing to operate, at least for public consumption, in the melodramatic
>virtual world.
>
>
>One cannot, however, ignore reality forever. The likelihood of a
>pro-generator decision from FERC means that there will be no easy out for
>Davis, or for his pending deal to prevent Southern California Edison from
>slipping into bankruptcy court. The Legislature has refused to act on the
>Edison rescue plan while it awaited an indication of whether the utility's
>debts would be slimmed down by FERC.
>
>
>This week's farcical events make it more likely that the Edison deal will
>stall out permanently in the Legislature and its creditors will force the
>utility into bankruptcy court later this summer. That's part of that nasty
>old reality that cannot simply be wished away.
>
>
>
>The Bee's Dan Walters can be reached at (916) 321-1195 or
>dwalters@sacbee.com.
>
>
>
>
>
>
><< pic08526.gif >>
><< pic13357.gif >>
><< pic29337.gif >>

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com


Good morning,

ENW Global Messaging would like to apologize for the previous version of the mailing.  Below is the intended version.

Signature Service:  The Key To Customer Satisfaction ( Wilson Learning)

Come join us and learn more about what it means to provide Excellent Service!
(2 Classes have been scheduled with 20 slots available for each date.)
October 18-19;    November 1-2
  in EB 560    Cost:  $740.00
8:00 a.m.-5:00 p.m. (1st day)
8:00 am - 12 noon (2nd day)

Topics Covered Include:
Discovering the Opportunities in Customer Satisfaction
Managing Myself
Opening the Interaction
Determining Needs and Expectations
Managing the Interaction
Satisfying Customers in Comfortable & Indecisive Conditions
Satisfying Customers in the Insistent & Irate Conditions

Please log onto http://elm.enron.com to sign up for the class of your choice.  The class is listed under "By Invitation" Category.   If you have problems registering or have any questions, please call 713-853-0357.


I can do it, but have to be at the airport before 2:00 for a flight to NY.

	Sherri Sera
	03/14/2001 04:17 PM

		 To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Maureen McVicker/NA/Enron@Enron, Mary Poorman/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Gas Controller's Association speaker (California Energy Crisis)

Steve, Jeff will be in Boston on this date doing 1:1s following 1Q earnings
release.  Is this something you would be interested in/available to do?  If
not, who would you recommend sending it to?  Thanks, SRS
---------------------- Forwarded by Sherri Sera/Corp/Enron on 03/14/2001
04:16 PM ---------------------------

Mary Poorman
03/14/2001 03:14 PM
To: Jeff Skilling/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Gas Controller's Association speaker (California Energy Crisis)

The Gas Controller's Association, of which I am the Assistant Secretary, is
holding a meeting on April 19th at the Gulf South (Koch) Building.  We would
like to present a speaker who can educate our members on the California
Energy Crisis, and discuss/present any of the proposed solutions thereto.
We would appreciate it if you could carve some time out of your very busy
schedule.  If you are unable to make any commitments, could you recommend
someone within the organization who would be as well-versed on the topic?

About our organization:

The mission statement of the GCA is to "create an environment that
facilitates the exchange of current and practical information, while
enhancing relationships and promoting goodwill between operating, scheduling,
distribution, and others involved in the process of
moving natural gas."  In addition, the GCA provides scholarships to students
who plan to obtain a degree in a field deemed to be
"industry related" from local area high schools.

Thank you for your time,

Mary Poorman


Southwest Airlines e-mail update for
May 29, 2001

****************************************************************
Anniversary Specials and Take Along Fares
for $30 Each Way

I.	"Take Along" Fares for $30 Each Way
II.	$30 Each Way Anniversary Specials
III.	southwest.com Click 'n Save(R) Specials
IV.	Click 'n Save Subscriber Information

***************** Take Along Specials  *********************

I. This week, Southwest Airlines is giving the
Subscribers of southwest.com E-mail Updates an
advance notice of the latest special available systemwide.
Starting this morning, Tuesday, May 29, 2001,
Southwest Airlines Customers will be able to
take advantage of the Special "Take Along" Fares.

Purchase a special, discounted, roundtrip fare and
Take Along a friend or family member for
only $30 each way with a 7-day advance purchase!
Reservation must be made in even number of
passengers to qualify.

Fares do not include a federal excise tax of $2.75
that will be imposed on each flight segment of your
itinerary. A flight segment is defined as a takeoff and
a landing. The fares listed do not include airport-assessed
passenger facility charges (PFCs) of up to $18 roundtrip.

For more information and to reserve the Take Along
Specials, please visit us at:
http://www.southwest.com/jp/hotfares.shtml?src=ta0529

******** $30 Each Way Anniversary Specials ************

II. This week's Anniversary Specials:

Birmingham, AL to/from
  New Orleans, LA $30 one-way.

Boise, ID to/from
  Seattle, WA $30 one-way.

Dallas, TX Love Field to/from
  New Orleans, LA $30 one-way

Las Vegas, NV to/from
  Los Angeles, CA $30 one-way

Orlando, FL to/from
  West Palm Beach, FL $30 each way.

St. Louis, MO to/from
  Tulsa, OK $30 one-way

The following restrictions will apply:

*Available only at southwest.com
*21-day advance purchase
*Fares are nonrefundable
*Travel June 19, 2001 through October 26, 2001.
*Purchase beginning May 29, 2001 through
 May 31, 2001, midnight Pacific Time.

Fares do not include a federal excise tax of $2.75
that will be imposed on each flight segment of your
itinerary. A flight segment is defined as a takeoff and
a landing. The fares listed do not include airport-assessed
passenger facility charges (PFCs) of up to $18 roundtrip.

Please visit our Reservations section to reserve the
Southwest Airlines 30th Anniversary Specials at
http://www.southwest.com/jp/hotfares.shtml?src=30th0529

******* southwest.com Click 'n Save Specials********
III. We're letting Click 'n Save take a two week
vacation while we offer the Take Along Fares.

Check out our Take Along Specials and Anniversary
Specials at:
http://www.southwest.com/jp/hotfares.shtml?src=cns0529

******** This is the Additional Information section********
Additional Information You Need to Know About All
of Our Sales:

*Changes to any portion of the reservation
 (flight, dates, cities, and/or names of passengers),
 once purchased, will result in the cancellation of
 the ENTIRE reservation and rebooking at the lowest
 fare available which could result in a fare increase.

*Southwest specials are nonchangeable
 and nonrefundable.
*Ticketless Travel Online may only be purchased with
 a credit card. Customers holding funds from
 a previously unused trip on Southwest Airlines or Customers
 who have Southwest Airlines vouchers will not be able to use
 those forms of payment for Ticketless Travel Online.
*Unused funds may be applied toward future travel on
 Southwest Airlines within one year of the original purchase date.

*Seats are limited and won't be available on some
 flights that operate during very busy travel times
 and holiday periods, such as Fourth of July and Labor Day.

*Standby travel requires an upgrade to the
 full unrestricted fare.

****************** Subscriber Information *******************
IV. Please pass this great news on to your friends!
To subscribe to Southwest Airlines
Click 'n Save E-mail Updates,
visit http://www.southwest.com/email/

Remember, if you change your Internet service provider,
you will need to unsubscribe and re-subscribe in order
to continue receiving Click 'n Save email updates.
Please visit our subscription page at:
http://www.southwest.com/email/
****************************************************************
This is a post only mailing from Southwest Airlines.
Please do not attempt to respond to this message.

Copyright 2001 Southwest Airlines Co. All Rights Reserved.

---
You are currently subscribed to special-offers as: gstorey@ect.enron.com
You can unsubscribe anytime at http://www.southwest.com/email/


pls print.  thanks
---------------------- Forwarded by Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron on 11/09/2000
05:28 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Dan Fancler                           11/09/2000 01:12 PM

To: Rudi Zipter/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Bob Chandler/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Jerry Peters/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, Drew
Fossum@ENRON, Tony Pryor/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: ETS Risk Management Policy

Rudi,

Below is ETS Risk Management Policy, which we would like Corporate to review
before it is presented to management for approval and limit establishment.  I
have also attached a 1st draft of the Risk Management Procedures and Controls
that while not all are fully in place we expect them to be operational once
transactional active increases.

Rudi, who would be the person to check with on this policy.


As you can see from the attached, Stella and John continue to review EES'
rate curves.  We hope to really get this process fully up to speed with the
addition of Amr Ibrahim to the group.

Jim

----- Forwarded by James D Steffes/NA/Enron on 02/21/2001 07:58 PM -----

	Stella Chan@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
	02/21/2001 01:45 PM

		 To: Janine Migden/NA/Enron@Enron, Barbara A Hueter/NA/Enron@Enron, Harry
Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, John
Neslage/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
		 cc: Robert Neustaedter/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Amr
Ibrahim/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Yolanda Lopez/HOU/EES@EES,
Patrick Keene/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: IN PSI Curves

PSI's HLFP and HLFS curves plus munis/co-ops were reviewed and attached are
the summary of the regulatory assumptions.  "Yellow" is initially assigned to
the curves because of difference in opinion on the transition period
assumption.

Please let me know if you have any comments.  Thanks!

Stella


I hope that each one of you will arrange your schedules tomorrow to make the
time to vote.  Also, please encourage everyone on your staff to take the time
to vote tomorrow.   For those employees who typically work later hours,
please suggest that they take the time to vote before coming to the office.
Everyone should feel that they have sufficient time to make their vote
count.  It should be interesting to watch the returns tomorrow evening.
Hopefully, we will have all played a part in the outcome.


Michael, I'm responding on behalf of Jeff Skilling, who is traveling abroad.

It appears that this is informational only for Jeff, and you are not inviting
him to attend the meetings.  If this is an invitation to attend, he is unable
to as he will still be traveling abroad.

Sherri

To: Colin Skellett/BTH/AZURIX@AZURIX, John L Garrison/HOU/AZURIX@AZURIX,
Rebecca Mark, Andrea Mainelli/HOU/AZURIX@AZURIX, Rodney
Faldyn/HOU/AZURIX@AZURIX, Amanda K Martin/HOU/AZURIX@AZURIX, John
Ale/HOU/AZURIX@AZURIX
cc: Jeff Skilling/Corp/Enron@ENRON, J Mark Metts/NA/Enron@Enron, Cliff
Baxter/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Azurix Investment Banking Meeting

I have made some arrangements in scheduling potential investment bankers to
talk with us about our current project.  I have informed them about our
current situation and thinking, and they will be prepared to present their
ideas on deal process, potential investors/buyers, valuation, fee proposal,
credentials etc.  I plan to make a decision very quickly regarding whom we
will work with, and get the process moving as quickly as possible.

We will meet with Merrill Lynch on Monday February 28 (a time has not yet
been designated)
Schroder's will be in our offices on Wednesday March 1, 2000 at 9:30 am
I am still trying to schedule a date and time with Nicholas Wrigley and
Rothchild

I would greatly appreciate your letting me know if (1) you have interest in
attending these meetings and (2) you can attend a Merrill meeting on Monday
and the Schroder's meeting on Wednesday.  Thanks.

Michael Anderson
646-9666


Is this a final decision or are you still considering your options? Ron

>>> <Alan.Comnes@enron.com> 03/15/01 06:06PM >>>

Jim, Ron:

We're leaning toward plain-vanilla (1).  The commercial attornies like the
devil they know (CDWR) more than the devil they don't (whomever would pick
up the contracts if Tuscon prevailed and the BFMs were sent back to the
PX).

I have asked to sit down with Chris Yoder and Steve Hall to go over our
positions in these charge back dockets more carefully.

Alan

From: James D Steffes@ENRON on 03/15/2001 09:53 AM CST

To:   Christian Yoder/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject:  Interventions in Tuscon Complaint Proceeding

What is your take on filing?

Jim

----- Forwarded by James D Steffes/NA/Enron on 03/15/2001 09:41 AM -----

                    "Ronald
                    Carroll"             To:
                    <rcarroll@brac       cc:
                    epatt.com>           Subject:

                    03/15/2001
                    09:30 AM

Just a reminder that interventions and comments in this proceeding are due
next Monday, March 19th.  This case concerns a complaint filed by Tuscon
Electric challenging Governor Davis' and the state of California's
commandeering of the BFM contracts of SCE and PG&E.  The complaint argues
that the contracts belong to interstate markets and are beyond the reach of
the state's eminent domain powers.

While the complaint is consistent with arguments that we have made in the
past on many issues, I am not clear whether, on a commercial level, EPMI is
upset that the Governor commandeered the contracts.  My surface analysis is
that the state is unlikely to pay fair value for the contracts and thus, if
this is the only consideration, we would be better off if the contracts are
returned to the PX to use as collateral on SCE's and PG&E's defaults
(thereby mitigating chargeback exposure).  I am not in position, however,
to evaluate whether EPMI sees a commercial advantage in buying these
contracts from DWR as opposed to buying them back from the PX under the
liquidation procedures announced by the PX before the contracts were
commandeered.  FYI, the PX's procedures gave counterparties (such as EPMI)
first opportunity to buy the contracts; when SCE protested this method, we
intervened in support of the PX's proposal.

We have three courses of action:  (1) file a plain vanilla intervention;
(2) intervene and file short comments in support of the complaint; or (3)
do nothing.  Since interventions and comments are due on Monday, please
advise as soon as possible which course you prefer.  I am available in my
office (202-828-5872) to discuss.

Thanks.  Ron


Jason:  Before we designate specific individuals, let's think this through.
A "generic" address may be more appropriate.  Which agreement did we recently
sign with reference to the "Documentation Desk"?  Sara
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 08/15/2000 02:43 PM -----

	Mike Fowler@ENRON
	08/15/2000 11:54 AM

		 To: "JASON PETERS" <PETEJ@andrews-kurth.com>
		 cc: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: BuySideDirect

Jason, I suggest that Madhur Dayal be designated initially at the person to
receive notification of material changes to agreements.  We should retain the
ability to change this contact person.

Sara, as noted in my earlier email to you and Sheila Glover, we should ensure
that agreements with online trading platforms allow for trading by ENA, ECT
Investments and EnronCredit.com.

Thanks.

Mike
713-853-9990

"JASON PETERS" <PETEJ@andrews-kurth.com> on 08/14/2000 11:29:27 AM
To: <mike.fowler@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: BuySideDirect

Mike,

Who should notices be addressed to?

Jason


You have been added to the RRGA-L mailing list (RTO West Congestion Model
Content Group) by Keith Dalia <kadalia@BPA.GOV>.

Please save this message for future  reference, especially if this is the
first time you subscribe to an  electronic mailing list. If you ever need
to  leave the  list,  you  will find  the  necessary instructions  below.
Perhaps  more importantly,  saving a  copy of  this message  (and of  all
future subscription notices  from other mailing lists) in  a special mail
folder will give you instant access to the list of mailing lists that you
are subscribed  to. This may  prove very useful the  next time you  go on
vacation and  need to leave  the lists temporarily so  as not to  fill up
your  mailbox while  you  are away!  You should  also  save the  "welcome
messages" from the  list owners that you will  occasionally receive after
subscribing to a new list.

To send  a message to  all the people  currently subscribed to  the list,
just send mail  to RRGA-L@LIST.RTOWEST.ORG. This is  called "sending mail
to the  list", because  you send  mail to a  single address  and LISTSERV
makes  copies  for all  the  people  who  have subscribed.  This  address
(RRGA-L@LIST.RTOWEST.ORG)  is also  called the  "list address".  You must
never try to send any command to that address, as it would be distributed
to all the people  who have subscribed. All commands must  be sent to the
"LISTSERV  address",   LISTSERV@LIST.RTOWEST.ORG.  It   is  very
important to understand  the difference between the  two, but fortunately
it is  not complicated. The  LISTSERV address is  like a FAX  number that
connects you  to a  machine, whereas  the list address  is like  a normal
voice line connecting you to a person. If you make a mistake and dial the
FAX number  when you  wanted to talk  to someone on  the phone,  you will
quickly realize  that you used the  wrong number and call  again. No harm
will have been done. If on the  other hand you accidentally make your FAX
call  someone's  voice  line,  the  person receiving  the  call  will  be
inconvenienced, especially if your FAX then re-dials every 5 minutes. The
fact that  most people  will eventually  connect the  FAX machine  to the
voice line to  allow the FAX to  go through and make the  calls stop does
not mean  that you  should continue  to send FAXes  to the  voice number.
People would just get mad at you.  It works pretty much the same way with
mailing  lists, with  the difference  that  you are  calling hundreds  or
thousands of people  at the same time, and consequently  you can expect a
lot of people to get upset if  you consistently send commands to the list
address.

You may leave the list at any  time by sending a "SIGNOFF RRGA-L" command
to LISTSERV@LIST.RTOWEST.ORG. You can also tell LISTSERV how you
want it to confirm  the receipt of messages you send to  the list. If you
do not trust  the system, send a "SET RRGA-L  REPRO" command and LISTSERV
will send you a  copy of your own messages, so that you  can see that the
message was distributed and did not get damaged on the way. After a while
you  may find  that this  is getting  annoying, especially  if your  mail
program does not  tell you that the  message is from you  when it informs
you that new mail has arrived from  RRGA-L. If you send a "SET RRGA-L ACK
NOREPRO" command, LISTSERV will mail you a short acknowledgement instead,
which  will look  different in  your  mailbox directory.  With most  mail
programs you  will know immediately  that this is an  acknowledgement you
can read  later. Finally,  you can  turn off  acknowledgements completely
with "SET RRGA-L NOACK NOREPRO".

Following  instructions from  the list  owner, your  subscription options
have been set to "NOFILES REPRO" rather than the usual LISTSERV defaults.
For more  information about subscription  options, send a  "QUERY RRGA-L"
command to LISTSERV@LIST.RTOWEST.ORG.

Contributions sent to this list are automatically archived. You can get a
list of the available archive files  by sending an "INDEX RRGA-L" command
to  LISTSERV@LIST.RTOWEST.ORG. You  can then  order these  files
with a "GET RRGA-L LOGxxxx"  command, or using LISTSERV's database search
facilities. Send an  "INFO DATABASE" command for more  information on the
latter.

This  list is  available  in digest  form.  If you  wish  to receive  the
digested version of the postings, just issue a SET RRGA-L DIGEST command.

Please note that  it is presently possible for other  people to determine
that  you are  signed up  to the  list through  the use  of the  "REVIEW"
command,  which  returns   the  e-mail  address  and  name   of  all  the
subscribers. If  you do not  want your name to  be visible, just  issue a
"SET RRGA-L CONCEAL" command.

More  information on  LISTSERV  commands  can be  found  in the  LISTSERV
reference  card, which  you can  retrieve  by sending  an "INFO  REFCARD"
command to LISTSERV@LIST.RTOWEST.ORG.


John,

Below is a response from Richard Harper.  A couple of interesting thoughts.
Richard would be a great source for running ideas by and/or  testing
concepts.  He is brilliant on this.
Just a thought.

Mike
---------------------- Forwarded by Mike McConnell/HOU/ECT on 06/07/2000
12:24 PM ---------------------------

Richard Harper
06/07/2000 09:30 AM
To: Mike McConnell/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: J-Block

I have not been involved, but only last week a little bird told me that they
have severe problems with reserve levels and expect to decline in 2002, when
we were talking it was 2004 and then only by a small amount.  Agip is
particularly adversely effected (as Agip in particular lacks reserves in the
area).  I understand the development of Jade by BG and Phillips and the
squeeze down of Texaco and OMV, the other Jade owners, by Agip  to sell their
gas to Agip was driven by this lack of reserves.

You will recall that liquidated damages was a big issue they wanted to retain
them rather than actual damages and we insisted that they remained at the
same absolute level as in the old agreement, so I believe they are 40% of the
new price (my memory is fading also).  I do recall that they all insisted
that they would deliver the gas.  However, as with most companies the players
have all moved on and a contract is a contract, afterall this was our
approach.  Also I am sure they intended to maximise production from J-Block
and did not forsee a shortage of production.

 It would be interesting to know if this is an agreed policy by them or
whether one of the sellers is blocking the NBP sale by refusing to
co-operate, they could do this because of the Common Stream Agreement.
Presumably they have not yet split the 3 agreements yet.

As to opportunity if they are short of reserves, perhaps they can buy
themselves out of the situation, especially while the contract is in the
money.

With my adversarial hat on perhaps BG want revenge for their loss in the
appeal courts?   This is probably nearest to the truth.

I'm afraid this isn't much help and I do not recall any willful default
provisions in the agreement.

Richard

Mike McConnell
07/06/2000 14:49
To: Richard Harper/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: J-Block

Richard,
 Hello from South America.  I am forwarding this email from John regarding
the J-Block problems.  Have you been involved in this?  What are your
thoughts?  If you have any ideas or can provide with some help, please
follow-up.  This is confidential but i thought you could help.  When he
mentioned this, I really couldn't remember much.  Amazing how the memory
fades on some of the details in just a few years.

Mike
---------------------- Forwarded by Mike McConnell/HOU/ECT on 06/07/2000
08:47 AM ---------------------------

John Sherriff
06/06/2000 12:09 PM
To: Jeff Skilling/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Mike McConnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard Lewis/LON/ECT@ECT, Peter
Crilly/LON/ECT@ECT
Subject: J-Block

I mentioned on our conference call on Monday that J-Block has had problems
meeting our nominations from the Judy/Joanne/Janice reservoirs.

Up until recent CATS maintenance shutdown on 15 May, they were making up for
reduced production volumes by nominating to supply gas at the NBP which they
are entitled but not obliged to do.  Since return from outage at the end of
May they have declined to nominate at the NBP.

From 1 January to 15 May, the Sellers use of the NBP delivery option kept
underdeliveries to 350 mmcf (ie one day's maximum quantity) in total.  Since
returning from the maintenance shutdown, underdeliveries have totalled 850
mmcf ( averaging 77mcf/d ).

We believe that following the sharp rise in market prices during the
maintenance period, they have decided to default on the contract rather than
make up deliveries from other sources.   They have an effective cap on the
penalties of about 5 pence per therm (after taking into account the value of
the liquids) and therefore they are not making up the volumes when the daily
price is substantially higher than about 16 pence per therm.

Prior to the CATS shutdown, we had made them a proposal to enable them to
deliver additional volumes at  another alternative to avoid default but they
have not responded yet.

You mentioned that in your negotiations with Phillips they had committed to
getting us all the gas regardless of the cap on the penalties.  This has cost
us about $1.5 million to date and they seem to be institutionalising their
non performance.    Perhaps a phone call by you might help.

By the way I will be in Houston on Thursday and Friday to meet with the
delegation from Croatia and I will probably be tied up the entire time but if
you need me
for a phone call I can break away.

John


The Floor presentations will be saved in

O:Portland:WestDesk:FloorOverview


---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT on 04/26/2001
10:33 AM ---------------------------
From: Veronica Espinoza/ENRON@enronXgate on 04/26/2001 10:02 AM
To: Janie Aguayo/HOU/ECT@ECT, Diane Anderson/NA/Enron@Enron, Derek
Bailey/Corp/Enron@ENRON, David Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jean Bell/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Patricia Boulanger/CAL/ECT@ECT, Bob Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Julie
Brewer/NA/Enron@Enron, Lesli Campbell/ENRON@enronXgate, Celeste
Cisneros/ENRON@enronXgate, Sharon Crawford/CAL/ECT@ECT, Richard
Deming/NA/Enron@Enron, Russell Diamond/ENRON@enronXgate, Cindy
Feldman/CAL/ECT@ECT, Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT, Veronica
Gonzalez/ENRON@enronXgate, Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Walter
Guidroz/ENRON@enronXgate, Larry Joe Hunter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kam
Keiser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT@ECT, Errol
McLaughlin/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Nidia Mendoza/ENRON@enronXgate, Tom
Moran/ENRON@enronXgate, Bianca Ornelas/NA/Enron@Enron, Leslie
Reeves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tanya Rohauer/ENRON@enronXgate, Dianne Seib/CAL/ECT@ECT,
Linda Sietzema/CAL/ECT@ECT, Kim S Theriot/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ellen
Wallumrod/NA/Enron@ENRON, Melinda Whalen/CAL/ECT@ECT, Tiffany
Williams/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Credit Report--4/26/01


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Oxley, David
Sent:	Friday, December 07, 2001 5:01 PM
To:	Kitchen, Louise
Subject:	RE: Benefits for Terminated Employees

We've sorted this. They'll get packages in next couple of days. Distributions from savings plan may take a while.

David
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kitchen, Louise
Sent:	Thursday, December 06, 2001 8:32 PM
To:	Oxley, David
Subject:	FW: Benefits for Terminated Employees
Importance:	High

Seems like a logical request.  Tell me 90 days is not serious??

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dinari, Sabra L.
Sent:	Thursday, December 06, 2001 2:48 PM
To:	Hall, Bob M; Kitchen, Louise; Lavorato, John; Black, Don; Dietrich, Janet
Subject:	Benefits for Terminated Employees
Importance:	High

Hi all,

I just got off the phone with the Benefits Center and they are informing people that it could take up to 90 days for them to send "termination packages" out to these employees and then you can send in your forms and it will take another 30 days to get a check, specifically talking about the Cash Balance Plan money.  This all happens AFTER they get a notice that you are terminated which they usually process on the 1st....come on, what is up with this???  It could very well take up to 5 months for people to get a check in their hands?  That is not right.  Since all of you have a lot more clout than me or any of the terminated employees, I'm hoping that someone will take this up with Human Resources or whomever to get this form downloadable or something to speed up this process.

Thanks.

Sabra Dinari


Please get this to Tino.  I don't know what went wrong but the email didn't
go throught.  Thanks. DF
---------------------- Forwarded by Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron on 07/21/2000
11:37 AM ---------------------------

Delivery Failure Report
Your document:	Four Corners Pricing
was not delivered to:	tmonaldo@mrg-11c.com
because:	No route found to domain mrg-11c.com from server NAHOU-LN11/ENRON.
Check DNS configuration.

What should you do?
You can resend the undeliverable document to the recipients listed above by
choosing the Resend button or the Resend command on the Actions menu.
Once you have resent the document you may delete this Delivery Failure Report.
If resending the document is not successful you will receive a new failure
report
Unless you receive other Delivery Failure Reports, the document was
successfully delivered to all other recipients.

NAHOU-LN11/Enron, NAHOU-LN11/Enron

________________________

To: tmonaldo@mrg-11c.com
cc:
From: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron
Date: 07/21/2000 11:03:08 AM
Subject: Four Corners Pricing

Tino, attached is a spreadsheet with the info I think you need.  I got the
publication wrong--its "Megawatt Daily" that posts daily prices.  Hope this
is helpful.  DF

Drew,

Attached is an excel file which contains pricing for the following delivery
points January 1, 1999 through
April 30, 2000:

 Four Corners
 Palo Verde
 Mead Nevada
 Southwest Power Pool

Let me know if you want any additional information.  We can get April 30,
2000 to present information.  I just
have to call RDI--they put it out by quarter so at the end of July we will
get the next disk.  They'll send me the
data if we need it.

Lorna


I'm OK with the language, but I want to make sure everyone is OK on the
concept.  When we left this (unless there have been subsequent conversations
with ECS that I wasn't a part of) we rejected Courtney's proposal to reduce
our up front payment by $500,000.  He was to come back and propose a monthly
quantity of gas to be paid over the term of the contract that would equate to
the $500,000, but I don't recall that we agreed to it.  Did we intend to
leave the issue open for more horsetrading on the amount of a haircut ECS
should take or were we content to cover ECS at 100 cents on the dollar?  I am
advised that the Btu number in the letter would allow ECS to get the full
$500,000 of up front value.

Rod and Steve--this one is up to you and I think its totally a question of
whether we want to argue for some more $$ because I can't think of any other
open issue with ECS on this or any other deals that we might be able to
trade.    DF

---------------------- Forwarded by Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron on 05/11/2000
05:46 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Susan Scott                           05/11/2000 03:37 PM

To: David Foti/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, James Centilli/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steven
Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Drew Fossum@ENRON

Subject: Supplement to Gas Letter

Please take a look at this and let me know whether it accurately reflects
what you discussed with ECS.  I'm reviewing it now and will let you know my
comments soon.  They want to sign this up tomorrow.
---------------------- Forwarded by Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron on 05/11/2000
03:34 PM ---------------------------

Gerald Nemec@ECT
05/11/2000 03:35 PM
To: Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Mark Knippa/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Supplement to Gas Letter

Susan, Attached is the supplement to the gas letter which increases the
amount of gas TW delivers to the LLC. Please review and let me know.


ian is a lawyer (UK and Canadian qualified)

j

From: Tana Jones on 28/02/2001 11:55 CST
To: Justin Boyd/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: Andarko - European ISDA Negotiations

Is Ian a lawyer, paralegal or Credit person?  Also, Mark mentioned the London
Legal has been restructured somehow, and he asked me to ask you if could you
fax us an org chart that shows the structure...?

I hear you got a fancy new car!

	Justin Boyd
	02/28/2001 11:41 AM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Ian Brungs/EU/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Andarko - European ISDA Negotiations

Tana

Great idea - here's our latest ISDA schedule (note the changes to law,
process agent, notices, tax reps, etc)

If you work with Ian, that would be grand

TooToo

Justin

---------------------- Forwarded by Justin Boyd/LON/ECT on 28/02/2001 17:43
---------------------------

Matthew Dawson
28/02/2001 16:51
To: Nicola Beales/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Justin Boyd/LON/ECT@ECT

Subject: ISDA schedule

Here is e the Ectric schedule Template- please note ED'S   emails relating to
Conditions Precedent and the Eligible Swap Participant  Changes after the
implementation of the  U.S trading legislation, the name of which momentarily
escapes me!!

M


I agree.  It should be simulation and NOT sqrt(10).  When I said 10 is OK, I was referring to delta-gamma.  Naveen

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Port, David
Sent:	Friday, January 04, 2002 3:39 PM
To:	Hayden, Frank; Andrews, Naveen; Jia, Winston; Ramesh, Ganapathy; Gossett, Jeffrey C.; White, Stacey W.
Cc:	Brackett, Debbie R.; Presley, Mike E
Subject:	RE: Bankruptcy and Old Co.

I am afraid its simulation
Please refer to the Nike ads for a slogan

Thanks
DP

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hayden, Frank
Sent:	Friday, January 04, 2002 3:36 PM
To:	Andrews, Naveen; Jia, Winston; Port, David; Ramesh, Ganapathy; Gossett, Jeffrey C.; White, Stacey W.
Cc:	Brackett, Debbie R.; Presley, Mike E
Subject:	RE: Bankruptcy and Old Co.

I'm not in love with square root of 10, I prefer a simulation.  If the best idea is the square root multiplication, please let it be so.  I suggest using the up 99 field to saved the result in.  This way we can start tracking it in database.
Thanks,
Frank

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Andrews, Naveen
Sent:	Friday, January 04, 2002 3:32 PM
To:	Jia, Winston; Port, David; Ramesh, Ganapathy; Hayden, Frank; Gossett, Jeffrey C.; White, Stacey W.
Cc:	Brackett, Debbie R.; Presley, Mike E
Subject:	RE: Bankruptcy and Old Co.

All, The majority of instruments are swaps so that should not be a problem.  Delta-Gamma is a problem mainly for OTM options.
10-days is OK and standard for Delta-Gamma.  It is problematic for times greater than a month or more.
Naveen

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Jia, Winston
Sent:	Friday, January 04, 2002 1:40 PM
To:	Port, David; Ramesh, Ganapathy; Hayden, Frank; Gossett, Jeffrey C.; White, Stacey W.
Cc:	Brackett, Debbie R.; Andrews, Naveen; Presley, Mike E
Subject:	RE: Bankruptcy and Old Co.

Everyone,

If we do 10 days VaR, then people may challenge our delta-gamma methodology.  With the high volatility of energy market and the long time horizon, delta-gamma method may not be appropriate anymore.

As I said before, if we don't have too many option deals, just multiply square root of 10 (for 10-days VaR) to one day VaR.  If we do have lot option deals, then our current delta-gamma approach may not be good either.

Regards,

Winston

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Port, David
Sent:	Friday, January 04, 2002 11:37 AM
To:	Ramesh, Ganapathy; Hayden, Frank; Jia, Winston; Gossett, Jeffrey C.; White, Stacey W.
Cc:	Brackett, Debbie R.
Subject:	RE: Bankruptcy and Old Co.

NETCO, if partnered with an ibank will require VaR over a ten day holding period so this is a change we would need to make anyway

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Ramesh, Ganapathy
Sent:	Friday, January 04, 2002 10:28 AM
To:	Hayden, Frank; Jia, Winston; Gossett, Jeffrey C.; White, Stacey W.
Cc:	Port, David; Brackett, Debbie R.
Subject:	RE: Bankruptcy and Old Co.

Frank,
We are going through a very difficult task of splitting hardware, software,licenses across NETCO and estate. There are massive database transitions in progress and testing scheduled on the new environments on both sides. Database or program changes at this point are very difficult.

If Nilay can come up with the changes and the impact on existing programs, we can see how we can fit these in. But right now our priorities are to cleanup data for NETCO, carry out testing for such a condition and make sure all systems function appropriately on Estate.

Regards,
Ramesh

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hayden, Frank
Sent:	Friday, January 04, 2002 10:24 AM
To:	Jia, Winston; Gossett, Jeffrey C.; White, Stacey W.
Cc:	Port, David; Brackett, Debbie R.; Ramesh, Ganapathy
Subject:	Bankruptcy and Old Co.

It appears that we may start developing a pattern of assuring that our positions/curves are correct to the best of knowledge/ability, either  weekly or twice monthly.  This being the case (Jeff and Stacey, please let me if weekly is a correct statement, say Friday?) we will need to enhance our daily VAR calculations with a longer holding period reflecting our "best calc" time frame.

In English, this means that we need to start measuring VAR for a 5 day or 10 day holding period, pending Jeff and Stacey feedback.  What Risktrac needs to do regarding this business practice is report VAR for the longer holding period.  Due to the portfolio having gamma exposures, we cannot simply multiply everything by the square-root of time.  I suggest that in the RiskTrac system, we offer another box, in addition to the historical VAR box, a box for longer tenor.  I recognize this requires some alterations, but with scaled back business perhaps it won't be extremely difficult.

Additionally, this doesn't mean that we stop the daily/nightly functions we've been doing since the dawn of time, but it does mean that once a week we have a very high confidence that our books reflect our "reality" the way we understand it.

Bad idea? Feedback?

Thanks,
Frank


CORRECTION-------The first outage should be from 12:00AM to 12:00PM.

---------------------- Forwarded by Mark McCoy/Corp/Enron on 08/25/2000 03:13
PM ---------------------------

Mark McCoy
08/25/2000 03:08 PM
To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pat Clynes/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Stacey
Neuweiler/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Kleberg plant outages in September-----Cornhusker

I spoke with Michael Mazowita/White Pine Energy, as he said the expected
outages are as follows:

August 31st - September 1st 12hours  12:00pm to 12:00am No flow

September 25th-31st  all days     No flow


Poor Mouse!  This sounds like fun!  I would like to come if here.

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


You have been selected to receive either a BlackBerry or iPAQ if you feel it will meet your business needs.

The BlackBerry provides the following features:
Fully interactive - write, send, receive and respond to messages right from the unit
Synchronize all email composed and responded to via your handheld with your desktop email
Email responses from RIM handhelds appear exactly as if they came from your desktop email
Access web information including stock quotes, news, travel, sports, entertainment and more
Coverage that follows you nationwide - with no roaming fees
The iPAQ pocket PC is
Simple to use slim and powerful Pocket PC in a leek, elegant design
Wireless-ready access to email, internet/intranet, and corporate network
Modular expansion packs for expandability and flexibility
Industry-leading hand held capabilities for the enterprise
Extensive software suite

If you choose the BlackBerry device, it will also replace your current pager.
For more information or to schedule a preview of these devices call Jean McFarland at 51615. Upon ordering you will
need to provide Jean McFarland an email with your name and external ID.
(Your external ID is located in eHRonline.enron.com.  To find it, log in to eHRonline.enron.com.  Select Personal Information, then select other.
This will bring you to your personal info page.  Your external ID is located in approximately the middle of the page to the right of your SAP ID.)

Please reply by Wednesday, October 24th.  If you have any questions, don't hesitate to give me a call at 36136.

Regards,
Donna


Hi Everybody,
?
As of February 20th, my work schedule is changing  again.
I'll be working from 8a.m. to 4:30p.m. at NCS, and from 6p.m.  to 10p.m. at
ACT.? If you want to get a hold of me during the week, the  best time to call
is between 5p.m. and 5:30p.m. or between 10:30p.m. and  11:00p.m.
?
? I don't promise that I can talk for very long at these  times (especially
not at the 5:00 interval), but if you have a quick question  for me, or some
information to pass along, those are the times you can do  it.
?
If you want to have a more substantial conversation, you can  reach me on the
weekend.? After putting in a 60 hour week, I tend to sleep  a little late on
Saturday.? I suggest calling after 11a.m. if you want a  cheerful, alert
response.? And of course,? you can always reach me by  email.
?
Phil


The banks have given us the  green light on gas.  That means that they will
be prepared to fund with the back-up agreements only, even if the YPF GSA is
being re- negotiated or if we are in discussions with other suppliers.


2002 Seattle Super Saver
HOTEL RESERVATION

This is an automated acknowledgement, please do not reply.

Your Reservation Number is 3234G5BH0.  This is not a Hotel Confirmation Number.  A confirmation will be sent by the hotel, however, please retain this number for reference when making modifications to your reservation via this service.

Thank you for making your hotel reservation on Thu, Jan 3, 02 during the 2002 Seattle Super Saver over the dates of Mon, Oct 1, 01 - Sun, Apr 14, 02.

Make all changes, new reservations and cancellations through www.seattlesupersaver.com or by calling 800-535-7071 or 206-461-5882 until Sun, Apr 14, 02.

GUEST INFORMATION
Name:  		Ms. Susan M Scott
Organization:
Address:  		3805 W. Alabama

        		Houston, TX 77027
           		USA
Telephone:  	713-775-6472
Fax:
E-Mail:    		sscott5@enron.com

HOTEL RESERVATION INFORMATION
Hotel name: 	Claremont Hotel
Address:    	2000 Fourth Avenue @ Virginia
           		Seattle,  WA 98121
Telephone:  	206-448-8600
Fax:       		206-441-7140
Room reserved:	Deluxe Two Beds
Number of rooms:	1
Number of guests:	1
Check-in:		Thu, Jan 10, 02
Check-out:		Sun, Jan 13, 02
Room Being Shared With:

HOTEL RATES
Single Occupancy Rate:
Date                Rate
Thu, Jan 10, 02      $79.00
Fri, Jan 11, 02      $79.00
Sat, Jan 12, 02      $79.00

Additional charges per night, add $0.00 for 2nd guest, add $10.00 for 3rd guest, add $10.00 for 4th guest.

This rate excludes additional taxes and fees that may be charged by the hotel.

SPECIAL REQUESTS

Accessible Room Request: No

CANCELLATION POLICY
Reservations may be cancelled up to 24 hours prior to arrival without charge.  Reservations cancelled within 24 hours will be subject to individual hotel cancellation policy.

Rates based on number of guests.

1= $79

2= $79

3= $89

4= $99

A kind note about calling the hotel "just to be sure":
Please do not call your hotel "to be sure" until 24 hours after the reservations has been made.  Please understand that processing your reservations from Seattle Super Saver into the Hotel system will take a little time.  Rest assured that if you have received a reservation number already from Seattle Super Saver, the hotel will honor your booking.  Thank you for your consideration.

Passkey, its reservation system and/or their agents act only in the capacity of agent for all customers in all matters pertaining to hotel reservations, and as such are not responsible for guaranteed hotel rooms, damages, expenses, inconveniences or damage to any person or property from any cause whatsoever.


---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 03/28/2000 12:11
PM ---------------------------

Chris Germany
03/27/2000 09:18 AM
To: Kimberly Brown/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dan Junek/HOU/ECT@ECT, Maureen
Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: New Phone # for Judy

281-693-7427


Kay

I do have those sig pages.  Sorry about that -- I thought I had already given
them to you.  I will bring them up to you this morning.

Regards,
Rebecca

Kay Mann
05/14/2001 05:39 PM
To: Rebecca Walker/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Search for sigs

Hi Rebecca,

I'm trying to locate the sig pages for the NW guaranty.  These were the docs
that I approved after I had approved the letter agreement.  These signed
pages weren't with the letter agreements and change orders you brought me.
To you remember if you brought them to me before?  I haven't really searched
- I thought I would ask first.

Thanks,

Kay


---------------------- Forwarded by Dana Davis/HOU/ECT on 11/28/2000 04:14 PM
---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Dana Davis                           07/20/2000 03:51 PM

To: razz2@hotmail.com
cc:
Subject: Nikolas & Nikki

Nikki - call me after you get this.
---------------------- Forwarded by Dana Davis/HOU/ECT on 07/20/2000 03:50 PM
---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Dana Davis                           04/28/2000 05:24 PM

To: razz@pdq.com, kdavis2075@aol.com
cc:
Subject: Nikolas & Nikki


looks good to me.  have you sent for materials yet?

To: John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re:

I found a good place - Bay Area Sailing.  When you have time, go to their
website - www.bayareasailing.com and let me know what you think.

John Arnold
04/11/2001 08:43 AM
To: Kim Ward/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re:

australia definitely sounds cool.  might be a little tough though.
i'd be in for keemah if you want to do that

To: John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re:

I'm still going to do it.  I found out about one trip/lessons - 7 days in
Austrailia (Great Barrier Reef) - October - 40 ft. Beneteau - you are ASA
certified at the end.  In other words, you could rent a sailboat anywhere in
the world when you are done.  However, as fun and as cool as it sounds - it
may not be doable.

Also, got the name of a guy in Keemah that my friends took lessons from a few
years ago.  I might give him a call - he may be expensive - they had their
own boat.

I will keep you posted -

John Arnold
04/08/2001 08:15 PM
To: Kim Ward/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:

hey:
just wondering if you're still up for sailing lessons and if you've found out
anything???


Hi Amy, Jim Irvine (EBS head of Network Planning) and I (Team Lead, EBS
Research) will attend the meeting. We will have our assistances (Christine
Blair & Kristy Carnes, respectively) arrange the trip.  We will plan to come
in the night before and return on March 2,00.

Also, either Vince Kaminski (MD and Head of Enron Research) or Stinson Gibner
(VP, Enron Research) may also attend.  They will let me know shortly if they
plan to attend.

Regards,

Ravi.

P.S. Our company name has been changed to Enron Broadband Services
Kristy, Christine please make the appropriate travel arrangements. The place,
time, etc. are listed.

	amy@sdsc.edu
	02/24/00 07:07 PM

		 To: Ravi Thuraisingham/Enron Communications@Enron Communications
		 cc:
		 Subject: CAIDA 'Metrics' WG meeting, 2 Mar 00 (fwd)

Hi Ravi,

I wanted to follow up directly with you and see if you or anyone at Enron
had any interest in participating in the proposed CAIDA "Metrics" working
group meeting?

Please let me know.

Amy E. Blanchard
CAIDA

%%%%%%%%%%%%%
e-mail: amy@caida.org
phone: (858) 534-8338
fax:   (858) 534-5117

   B.  WG Charters, Meeting on 2 Mar 00

I believe that we should instead run a single CAIDA Working Group
on 'Network Metrics,' rather than the two proposed earlier.  My draft
of its charter is appended below.  It focuses on producing educational
material about network measurement, and on developing new metrics - these
were the two areas of greatest interest amongst the CAIDA members.

The WG co-chairs are
  Sue Moon (SprintLabs) and Brett Watson (MFN/Abovenet)

You are invited to attend the first WG meeting.
The agenda is as follows ..

   Agenda for CAIDA WG meeting on: Thursday 2 Mar 00
                                   -----------------
   10 am - 4 pm, AboveNet, Downtown SJC (see below for details)
   ------------            ------------

   1. Review WG Charter
      - Is it reasonable as set out in the draft?
      - What should be removed or added?

   2. Work through revised charter in detail
      - Identify the work required for each part
      - Determine who's willing to work on it
      - Attempt to determine delivery times

   3. Discussion of new metrics
      - First attempt at making a list of metrics to be considered

   4. Anything else ?

Location: AboveNet is located in the Knight-Ridder Building,
attached to the Fairmont Hotel complex.  The address is

  50 W. San Fernando St.
  San Jose, CA  95113

RSVP: To help us with organising the meeting, please send email to
   nevil@caida.org telling us how many will attend from
   your organisation.

Cheers, Nevil

-------------------------------------------------------------
   Nevil Brownlee                     Visiting Researcher
   Phone: (619) 822 0893                 CAIDA, San Diego

CAIDA Network Metrics Working Group: Draft Charter, Tue 23 Feb 00

Goals:
 1 Education
   + FAQ on What does 'measuring the Internet actually mean?'
     - Why measure anyway?
     - What can be measured?  How?  Where?  By whom?
     - Active vs passive, end-to-end vs provider network only,
       application vs transport layer
     - Rating schemes: provider 'net performance' pages, Internet
       'Weather Map's, Keynote, etc.
     Publish as CAIDA web pages, or maybe as an Info RFC

   + Survey paper on metrics and Internet Measurement
     - Current measurement efforts (Surveyor, RIPE Test Traffic,
       AMP, IPERF, AT&T, Keynote,skitter, ...)
     - Current tools
     Publish as CAIDA web pages

 2 Service Metrics
   + Define new metrics
     - Taxonomy of current metrics (IPPM, RTFM, ITU, ..)
     - Summary of metrics used for current services
     - Gather information/ideas about new/emerging services,
       especially DiffServ-based ones
     - Make list of new metrics, either to improve measurement of
       existing services or to support new ones
       [list of 'metrics' questions (Appendix A) goes here]

   + Organise experimental implementation/testing of tools
     for new metrics

   + Make recommendations on implementation
     - Define core set of 'really useful' metrics
     - recommend that CAIDA implement these as a
       'Service Measurement Toolkit'

   + Publish new metric definitions through IPPM or RTFM

   + Produce document "measurement requirements for hardware/software
     vendors."  Publish on CAIDA web pages

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

Appendix A: Questions from the earlier draft CAIDA WG charters

 a. What types of network- and transport-layer metrics are being
    used by ISPs in engineering and operating their networks?
    By Customers for verifying service guarantees?
 b. What new services are being (or are likely to be) offered, e.g.
    DIFFSERV?  Is there a need for higher-layer metrics to better
    monitor and manage these services?
 c. Will these new differentiated transport- and
    application-layer services need new metrics?
 d. How can the service metrics be measured in a multi-ISP
    environment?
 e. How can customers verify these measurements?
 f. What requirements would service measurement introduce for
    equipment vendors?

 g. How relevant are specific techniques (e.g. which flow) and
    points of measurement to specific users (ISP, customer, etc.)
    requirements?
 h. How do these metrics relate to network behavior as perceived
    by users? How do they correlate with performance?

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

Appendix B: Background on the IETF Working Groups

* RTFM WG: Realtime traffic Flow Measurement

RTFM is concerned with passive measurements of two-way traffic flows,
specified in terms of their end-point attributes.  Its primary goal was

To produce an improved Traffic Flow Measurement Model considering at least the
following needs:

 a. Wider range of measurable quantities, e.g. those
    relating to IPv6, and to class of service
 b. Simpler ways to specify flows of interest
 c. Better ways to control access to measured flow data
 d. Strong focus on data reduction capabilities
 e. Efficient hardware implementation

* IPPM WG: IP Performance Measurement

The IPPM WG charter is to develop a set of standard metrics that can
be applied to the quality, performance, and reliability of Internet
data delivery services. These metrics will be designed such that they
can be performed by network operators, end users, or independent
testing groups. It is important that the metrics not represent a value
judgement (i.e. define "good" and "bad"), but rather provide unbiased
quantitative measures of performance.

RFCs
  Framework for IP Performance Metrics (RFC 2330)
  Metrics:
     Connectivity (RFC 2678),
     One-way Delay (RFC 2679), One-way Packet Loss (RFC 2680)
     Round-trip Delay (RFC 2681)

I-Ds
     Bulk Transfer Capacity (2x)
     Instantaneous Packet Delay Variation
     One-way Loss Patterns

* Other WGs

The RMONMIB WG is thinking about 'Application Performance
Measurement.'  This is clearly a hard problem (e.g. does this just
mean response-time measurement, can it be done by passive means, how
should the measurements be presented, etc.).

In short
 - RTFM provides a good distributed measuring system for traffic
   volumes
 - IPPM has concentrated on transport-layer behaviour of the
   current, best-effort Internet.
 - RMONMIB is beginning to consider application-layer measurement

-------------------------------------------------------------------------


Thanks for the heads up.  Good idea on Kim and Martha--pls line them up for
the next meeting after tomorrow (call Martha Benner to schedule)  DF

Lee Huber
10/26/2000 04:55 PM
To: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Various

FERC Audit CWIP.  The FERCERS  wil be in Omaha Monday afternoon.  Gary, Vince
and myself have talked to the Regulatory Group about the Budget Item v.
project issue they had and i believe we are comfortable with the issue.  We
also briefed Keith and Ray Smith on the format and likely questions focusing
on "controls".

Also at some future staff meeting I would like to volunteer Kim Watson and
Martha Janousek to speak about Revenue Management and where we are in the
process now.  Maybe i can do alittle on business mthod patents which is
something we are starting to look at.


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 01/05/2000
10:54 AM ---------------------------

greetings@ynot.com (Why Not Creations) on 01/05/2000 10:54:33 AM
Please respond to greetings@ynot.com
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Your card has been sent, or, if it's a delayed card, will be sent on
the date requested

Your cards to the following individuals have been queued for sending on the
proper date (those listed for today have already been sent):

 Richard at richard@austin.rr.com

If you want to check your card, visit:

http://preview.ynot.com:80/cgi-bin/nd_CGI_50.cgi/YnotPhoenix/CPgRetrieveCard?f
ile=JXMZ685787


Joe,

Congratulations. Well deserved.

Vince

P.S. I shall call you Wed regarding a request to sponsor a publication
by the Commodities Now magazine.