Current Notes User:

To ensure that you experience a successful migration from Notes to Outlook,
it is necessary to gather individual user information prior to your date of
migration.  Please take a few minutes to completely fill out the following
survey. Double Click on document to put it in "Edit" mode. When you finish,
simply click on the 'Reply With History' button then hit 'Send'  Your survey
will automatically be sent to the Outlook 2000 Migration Mailbox.

Thank you.

Outlook 2000 Migration Team

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------

Full Name:

Login ID:

Extension:

Office Location:

What type of computer do you have?  (Desktop,  Laptop,  Both)

Do you have a PDA?  If yes, what type do you have:   (None, IPAQ, Palm Pilot,
Jornada)

Do you have permission to access anyone's Email/Calendar?
    If yes, who?

Does anyone have permission to access your Email/Calendar?
    If yes, who?

Are you responsible for updating anyone else's address book?
    If yes, who?

Is anyone else responsible for updating your address book?
    If yes, who?

Do you have access to a shared calendar?
    If yes, which shared calendar?

Do you have any Distribution Groups that Messaging maintains for you (for
mass mailings)?
    If yes, please list here:

Please list all Notes databases applications that you currently use:

In our efforts to plan the exact date/time of your migration, we also will
need to know:

What are your normal work hours?  From:      To:

Will you be out of the office in the near future for vacation, leave, etc?
       If so, when?        From (MM/DD/YY):      To (MM/DD/YY):


I am going with Wachsler  tomorrow, so maybe we can hook up and have a beer.
Darron has my cell number 713-819-0765.
PL


This is the language being proposed by HR to go out today to EIM employees.  It would be signed by Fran Mayes, who handles HR for EIM.  Please comment.

Eric
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This week, each business unit has been asked to identify the optimal structure and resources for EIM on a going forward basis.  While the review is not complete, we are close to finalizing decisions surrounding the business and the employees associated with them.

Until the final decisions have been made, I ask for your continued patience. You will be notified at the appropriate time regarding the future of the team.

Please take the opportunity to enjoy the time with your family next week at Thanksgiving and know that we are working hard on finalizing all details.


This is a reminder that the ect.enron.com,ei.enron.com,and ees.enron.com Email domains will be decommissioned by close of business Friday, January 18th. If you currently use an Email address of name@ect.enron.com, name@ei.enron.com or name@ees.enron.com, you will need to notify your contacts to send mail to you at firstname.lastname@enron.com.

This is the first step of several to standardize everyone's Email address to firstname.lastname@enron.com.

If you have questions regarding this email, send an Email to enron.messaging.administration@enron.com.

Thank you for participation, cooperation and support.
Enron Messaging Administration


[IMAGE]
											THANK YOU? Eric Bass

												This       is your order confirmation, please print this page for your
records.       For questions concerning your order, please call
1-888-SWB-BOWL or       email at ticket@swbellcottonbowl.org

												Order Number: 1030

		Qty.
							Selections
									Unit Price
														Item Totals

			2				Gate 2 - Upper Level - SEC		$60.00					$120.00

														[IMAGE]
					* NO EXCHANGES OR REFUNDS
									Subtotal
														$120.00
									Handling
														$7.00
									Total
														$127.00


Ta da
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 12/06/2000 10:10
PM ---------------------------

"Thompson, Peter J." <peterthompson@akllp.com> on 12/06/2000 01:34:21 PM
To: "Kay Mann (E-mail)" <kay.mann@enron.com>
cc: "Roseann Engeldorf (E-mail)" <roseann.engeldorf@enron.com>, "Pipitone,
Paul" <paulpipitone@akllp.com>, "Cobb, Chris" <chriscobb@akllp.com>, "Taylor,
Rob" <robtaylor@akllp.com>

Subject: Enron South America Break-Out Agreement Exhibits

 <<Exhibits to Gas Purchase Agreement(Clean).doc>>  <<Comparison of
Versions 5 to 6 (Exhibits to Gas Purchase Agreement).DOC>>

Attached please find clean and blacklined copies of the Enron South
America Facility Agreement Exhibits. The only change is the removal of
Exhibit U.

 - Exhibits to Gas Purchase Agreement(Clean).doc
 - Comparison of Versions 5 to 6 (Exhibits to Gas Purchase Agreement).DOC


The following expense report is ready for approval:

Employee Name: Grace L. Blair
Status last changed by: Ava L. Garcia
Expense Report Name: Sodexho Marriott @ Enron
Report Total: $518.52
Amount Due Employee: $518.52

To approve this expense report, click on the following link for Concur Expense.
http://expensexms.enron.com


A ClickAtHome Internet Service Provider has indicated that you are
 receiving subsidized Internet service through the program.

 1.  If this is correct, no action is required - continue to enjoy your
 Internet Service!

 2.  If you are NOT receiving Internet service through the ClickAtHome
 program, please email clickathome@enron.com to report the incorrect
 billing on your behalf.

 Thank you,

 ClickAtHome Team!


As our last day is Friday, November 30th, we would love to toast the good times and special memories that we have shared with you over the past five years.  Please join us at Teala's (W. Dallas) on Thursday, November 29th, beginning at 5pm.

Looking forward to being with you,

Lara and Janel

Lara Leibman
713.851.7770 (cellular)
713.528.5281 (home)
lleibman@houston.rr.com <mailto:lleibman@houston.rr.com>

Janel Guerrero
713.851.3778 (cellular)
713.524.1534 (home)
travelgirl_janel@hotmail.com <mailto:travelgirl_janel@hotmail.com>


Please post the JP MOrgan doc. on our site
----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 09/27/2000 05:22 PM -----

	Rob Bradley
	09/25/2000 10:31 AM

		 To: Margaret Carson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Digital Power Demand: JP Morgan Report

The JP Morgan report below gives further credence to the Mills/Huber thesis
of digital-age power growth.  The in-the-trenches story is different from
some of the academic studies by the conservation mavens.

- Rob

 - jp morgan.pdf


Enron Corp. has NOT agreed to:
1.  Credit Event Upon Merger
2.  Added Payer reps (or other tax related changes)
3.  Waiver of Jury Trial

I think Barclays may back down from the Cross Default changes.
Sheryl wants to stet her changes to "Automatic Early Termination."
Sheryl does need to see the other Ghost template changes.

Call if you have any questions.  713-853-5620

Sara

---------------------- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 12/21/99 10:46
AM ---------------------------

"Sheryl Gussett" <sgussett@bracepatt.com> on 12/20/99 05:00:15 PM
To: MOORCH@andrews-kurth.com, POPPT@andrews-kurth.com, "G. Alan Rafte"
<arafte@bracepatt.com>, "Mary Moreland" <mmoreland@bracepatt.com>, "Thomas
Tomlinson" <ttomlinson@bracepatt.com>, Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gareth
Bahlmann/HOU/ECT@ECT, Clement Abrams/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Deborah
Culver/HOU/EES@EES, Jimmie Williams/HOU/EES@EES, Robert Callan/HOU/EES@EES,
Scott Donaldson/HOU/EES@EES, Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT,
eawilburn@prickett.com, Kenton@rlf.com, jephross@velaw.com
cc: BARBD@andrews-kurth.com, DGUEST2@andrews-kurth.com,
LOWED@andrews-kurth.com, MCFAM@andrews-kurth.com
Subject: Re: Enron/Blackbird

Really, here is the attachment.  Sorry for the confusion.

 - schedule


Dave, I am available the 27th for mediation in the Evan Lovell case.  Michelle

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------

Michelle Cash
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3823
Houston, Texas  77002
(713) 853-6401
michelle.cash@enron.com

This message may contain confidential information that is protected by the
attorney-client and/or work product privileges.


We know you have questions about recent events impacting Enron and our plans for the future.  Ongoing investigations and pending litigation have made it difficult, if not impossible, to share information in a timely manner.  While we can't address certain issues, we can tell you about our initial plans to move Enron forward and emerge from bankruptcy, and we are eager to do that.

We had planned to hold an all-employee meeting tomorrow, January 23, at the Hyatt Regency.  However, we don't want to subject you to the media frenzy that would certainly surround such a meeting, so we've decided to postpone it.  We are currently making arrangements to hold a series of employee meetings within the building to protect your privacy.  We will provide the date and times to you as soon as the logistics for those meetings are finalized.

Prior to the employee meetings, we will provide an overview of Enron's new organizational structure.  You can expect that memo shortly.


sounds like you'll be getting a subpoena!  you co-conspirator you.


We moved the meeting to 12:00 for tomorrow and I am still searching for a
room, but am willing to do it just up on the floor near Rogers or Curry if
that is not a problem, because this shouldn't take too long.  Thanks!
Ben
3-7998


Given the growth in EES it has become apparent that it is time to consolidate
the risk functions between EES and EWS.  This will provide EES with the
systems, resources and risk expertise of the wholesale energy groups
necessary for it to continue to grow and take advantage of current market
opportunities.

With this in mind and in agreement with the management of EES, two new risk
groups inside Enron Americas will be formed to provide EES with pricing,
structuring, retail and wholesale commodity risk management, logistics and
back-office services.  These groups main function is to provide these
services to EES.  We have asked Rogers Herndon, currently Vice
President-Trading in the Eastern Power Group to manage this function in the
Eastern Interconnect (this includes both gas and power).  Rogers will
continue to report to Kevin Presto.  We have asked Don Black, formerly Vice
President-EES Risk Management and Sourcing, to manage this function in the
Western U.S.  Don will manage this group from Houston and will report to Tim
Belden.

These groups will work very closely with EES to pursue shared goals while
ensuring close coordination with the wholesale gas and power trading
organizations.

These changes are effective immediately.  Please congratulate Rogers and Don
on their new roles.

John Lavorato & Louise Kitchen


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 06/28/2000
07:55 AM ---------------------------

<avi.hauser@effem.com> on 06/20/2000 03:12:53 PM
To: "Vince J Kaminski" <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>
cc: richard.larsen@effem.com
Subject: Introduction

Vince:

   As way of introduction, I wanted to write a bit about Mars inc. and then
about CDS,
the unit I head.  Mars is a private company, considered to be the largest
privately owned
manufacturing company in the world.  Mars is not in the habit of disclosing
its
finances,
so the best I could do is refer to Forbes' estimate of $15 Billion annual
revenue and
to the profit margins of similar companies between 5-12%.  Mars is in the
business of
manufacturing confectionery (m&m, Dove bar, skittles, twix, - all (R))
food (Uncle Ben rice (R))  pet food (Pedigree, Whiskas Waltham (R)) and other
products.

Mars has prospered during the years because of a unique philosophy that
emphasizes the
long term goals of the company.  Part of the philosophy is to look for win-win
solutions with
its suppliers, customers and partners.

As can be understood from the nature of the company, a large chunk of its
expenses
goes towards purchasing commodity like products, and hence the history of
researching
those commodities and the weather that influences their supply and the demand
(people
eat less ice cream in the winter and less chocolate in the summer).

CDS has a history of few decades in forecasting  weather and has been very
successful,
with an envious track record, in helping Mars get a competitive advantage in
these arenas.
CDS is a global group (in 4 countries across two continents) which supports
the
purchasing
function and the corporate at large in these and other arenas.  It is a
multidiscipline and
multinational team with a lot to offer.

Not having a ready access to the energy markets, and with a risk profile based
on
manufacturing expertise, Mars has decided to look for potential partners in
this
area.
Enron presence in the market place certainly makes it an interesting party to
talk to.

In talking to Enron, we are careful to suggest that Mars is not committing to
anything
at this point, and all we are after is to find out if there is an interest to
pursue the opportunity
we discussed in the future.

I am looking forward to our video conference call.

Kind regards,

Avi

---------------------------------------
Avi I. Hauser  PhD MBA
CDS Director
100 International Drive Mt Olive NJ 07828-1383
+ 1 973 691 3664 (office)
+ 1 973 347 8189 (fax)
+ 1 973 727 3622 (car + slow paging)
hauser@cdsusa.com


please forward to all East traders and originators

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Taylor, Gary
Sent:	Wednesday, November 14, 2001 11:19 AM
To:	Neal, Scott
Cc:	Graubart, Marc; Simpson, Yvette
Subject:	Weather presentation to the East Desk

Scott,

Per our conversation, please schedule a room for a 1/2 hour presentation to your group at 3pm on Monday, Nov. 19.  We will cover the current status of the weather market, our current product offerings, target customers, and other opportunities.

See you then.

Gary
x31511


Hi Thomas

Scheduled for May 30th.  Looks like I incorrectly typed your name below.  Apologies.    We will be pulling together scheduls based on candides.   Let me know if you can/cannot participate.

Kind regards,

karen.

-----Original Message-----
From: 	Buckley, Karen
Sent:	Friday, May 18, 2001 12:57 PM
To:	Allen, Phillip K.; Arnold, John; Aucoin, Berney; Black, Don; Davis, Mark Dana; Gaskill, Chris; Gilbert-Smith, Doug; Gossett, Jeffrey C.; Grigsby, Mike; Herndon, Rogers; Thomas, Martin; McMichael Jr., Ed; Neal, Scott; Presto, Kevin; Schwieger, Jim; Shively, Hunter S.; Sturm, Fletcher; Superty, Robert; White, Stacey; Will, Lloyd
Cc:	Lavorato, John; Hillis, Kimberly; Dozier, Melissa; Kitchen, Louise
Subject:	Trading Track - Interviews: Wednesday May 30th

All,

We will be scheduling interviews for the Trading Track, Wednesday, May 30th from 1.00 pm to approximately 4.00 pm with a debrief afterwards.    We will be interviewing approximately 12 - 16 candidates (both internal and external).

Please reserve this time in your calander.    If you are unable to particpate please let me know otherwise you will be contacted with regards to location/confirmed times/resumes/etc shortly.

Any questions please do not hesitate to contact me.

Kind regards,

Karen.
x54667

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Martin, Thomas A.
Sent:	Tuesday, May 22, 2001 5:52 PM
To:	Buckley, Karen
Subject:	RE:  Recruitment - Trading Track

Has there been a date set for the next Trading Track interviews?

Tom

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Buckley, Karen
Sent:	Friday, April 20, 2001 8:05 AM
To:	Allen, Phillip; Arnold, John; Aucoin, Berney; Davis, Dana; Gaskill, Chris; Gilbert-Smith, Doug; Grigsby, Mike; Herndon, Rogers; Martin, Thomas A.; McMichael, Ed; Neal, Scott; Presto, Kevin; Schwieger, Jim; Shively, Hunter S.; Sturm, Fletcher; Will, Lloyd
Cc:	Lavorato, John; Kitchen, Louise; Hillis, Kimberly
Subject:	 Recruitment - Trading Track

 All,

We will be scheduling the next recruitment day for the ENA Trading Track in May (exact date to be confirmed).     If you would like to nominate any current Analyst/Associate or external candidates please forward to me their names.

Any questions please let me know.

Karen
x54667.


I just received a copy of this letter from Southwest Gas to Lee Stewart,
President of SoCalGas' transmission business unit.? They are asking for PECO
750H coalescing filters to be installed at to taps, and for SoCal to maintain
them.

 <<swgas.PDF>>

Are these the same filters that were used by PG&E?? Do you know what they
cost?? Does Transwestern wish to become involved, or would you prefer to stay
in the background?

Ralph Komai
Ralph Y. Komai, Ph.D.
Sempra Energy
Principal Environmental Specialist
Phone: (213) 244-5860 FAX: (213) 244-8046
Pager: (213) 287-2091
E-mail: RYKomai@sempra.com

 - swgas.PDF


FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 02/22/2001
07:53 AM ---------------------------

Ron James@EES
02/21/2001 10:30 AM
To: Marty Sunde/HOU/EES@EES, Harold G Buchanan/HOU/EES@EES, Dan
Leff/HOU/EES@EES
cc: Kalen Pieper/HOU/EES@EES, Judy Gray/HOU/EES@EES, David W
Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Elizabeth Tilney/HOU/EES@EES
Subject: David Pope

FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by Ron James/HOU/EES on 02/21/2001 10:23 AM
---------------------------

Dawn Doucet@ECT
02/20/2001 06:31 PM
To: Ron James/HOU/EES@EES
cc: Patricia Henry/CAL/ECT@ECT
Subject: David Pope

David Pope has "officially" given us his termination notice.  His last day at
Enron is March 6th, his last day in the office is Feb 21.  Let me know if you
have any questions.....


HOEGH GALLEON, DATE:	05-06-01	12:00	15:00	(UTC)
A) Position at noon:	N	23 24	W	069 20
B) Dist. From last noon:	438	nm
C) Dist. To go to next port:	1476	nm
D) ETA next port:	LAKE CHARLES	9th 04hrs	LT
E) 1: Average sea/wind	Sea:	E 3	Wind:	3
    2: Average speed	18.25	kn	RPM:	88.38
    3: BOG 	194.6	m3
    5: F.O Consumed	34	m3
    6: G.O. Consumed	0	m3
    7: Average vapor press		Average liq. Temp:
Tk1:	0.122	bar	-158.17	?C
Tk2:	0.120	bar	-158.19	?C
Tk3:	0.120	bar	-158.23	?C
Tk4:	0.120	bar	-158.28	?C
Tk5:	0.124	bar	-158.21	?C

Brgds Knut Bentzr?d
Master LNG/C "Hoegh Galleon"

E-mail: master.gall@hoegh.no
Teleph: Inmarsat tel.no. 330853910
Fax   : Inmarsat fax no. 330853913
Telex : Inmarsat B telex no. 330853915
Telex : Inmarsat C telex no. 430853910 (24hrs.watch)


Stephanie, Richard Sage returned my call from Friday and we have determined
an updated and complete slate of officers, along with titles, for ECI.  I
will forward the information to you so you can update the list.

Also, Stephanie, is there someone we can call to have them update the
database you looked into?  Let me know; we can do this later but the info
would be good to know.

Cheryl Nelson
Senior Counsel
EB3816
(713) 345-4693


Wanted to make sure you guys were informed.
Trish
---------------------- Forwarded by Tricia Bowen/HOU/ECT on 01/26/2000 09:34
AM ---------------------------

Joe A Casas
01/26/2000 08:49 AM
To: Tricia Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: FEBRUARY 2000 NEEDS

Trish, here are the dayton retail #'s for 2/00 for tgt.

---------------------- Forwarded by Joe A Casas/HOU/ECT on 01/26/2000 08:47
AM ---------------------------

knovsek@columbiaenergygroup.com on 01/26/2000 08:29:13 AM
To: Joe A Casas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Anita K Patton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Molly
LaFuze/HOU/ECT@ECT, Victoria Versen/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: "        -         *Perrone, Brian" <bperron@columbiaenergygroup.com>,
"        -         *Kinney, Doug" <dkinney@columbiaenergygroup.com>, "
-         *Diel, Donald" <ddiel@columbiaenergygroup.com>, "        -
*Swogger, Joanne" <jswogge@columbiaenergygroup.com>, "        -
*Stiles, Marianne" <mstiles@columbiaenergygroup.com>
Subject: FEBRUARY 2000 NEEDS

Listed below are my needs off ANR, TETCO, Transco and TGT for February 2000.
There are some capacity notes - please forward to the appropriate person.  If
you have any questions, please call me at 724-873-5700 ext. 247.  All deals
below are firm requirements.

ANR
 CG&E- deliveries to Springboro  dth/day LDC Nom Deadline is
12:30 on the 31st- note this can be served off TGT

Tetco
 BUG  118 dth/day LDC Nom Deadline is noon on the
28th
 Con Ed 241 dth/day   LDC Nom Deadline is 2 pm on
the  31st
 PECO  843 dth/day  LDC Nom Deadline is 12:30 on
the 28th
 PECO-PA Gas CNG - PA gas for PECO 230 dthday  (This gas
is to be PA Production to be nominated thru CNG to
Tetco     - CES must have pipeline proof that the
gas is PA Production)
 PSEG  1400 dth/day LDC Nom Deadline is 10 pm on the 28th
 Etown  18 dth/day LDC Nom Deadline is noon on the
28th
 NJN  volume not available yet -  dth/day LDC Nom
Deadline is 12:30 est on the 31st
 UGI  1489 dth/day LDC Nom Deadline is 10:30 est on
the 19th for the pre-nom and final is 10:30 est on the 31st
   UGI will pull from Enron's ELA pool #600228 and deliver
to UGI's citygate
 PFG  daily swing - see attached LDC Nom Deadline
is 12:30 on the 31st

Transco
 LILCO  365 dth/day    (capacity release is also for
volume of 365 - will need to confirm capacity on Transco)
   LDC Nom Deadline is noon on the 28th
 PSEG  155 dth/day  LDC Nom Deadline is 1:30 pm on
the 28th
 S Jersey volume not available yet - dth/day The Transco
scheduler must show in nomination the Enduser # 012224 to
be    confirmed by S Jersey- LDC Deadline is 12:30 on the
31st
 Piedmont 1300 dth/day LDC Nom Deadline is 10:30 est on
the 26th
 PSNC  190 dth/day (CES will get the capacity release for
this from PSNC - someone must execute)
   The supply will be from PSNC's pool #7620 (this is
their station 85 pool)
   LDC Nom Deadline is noon on the 31st

Texas Gas
 DP&L  1309 dth/day LDC Nom Deadline is 12:30 est
on the 31st
 CG&E  1550 dth/day LDC Nom Deadline is 12:30 on
the 31st- note this can be served off ANR

 - PENN FUEL OFF TETCO FOR FEB                     2000.xls


We met with Gov Davis on Thursday evening in LA.  In attendance were Ken Lay,
the Governor, the Governor's staff director (Kari Dohn) and myself.  The gov.
spent over an hour and a half with us covering our suggestions and his
ideas.  He would like some additional thoughts from us by Tuesday of next
week as he prepares his state of the state address for the following Monday.
Attached to the end of this memo is a list of solutions we proposed (based on
my discussions with several of you) as well as some background materials Jeff
Dasovich and I prepared.  Below are my notes from the meeting regarding our
proposals, the governor's ideas, as well as my overview of the situation
based on the governor's comments:

Overview:   We made great progress in both ensuring that he understands that
we are different from the generators and in opening a channel for ongoing
communication with his administration. The gov does not want the utilities to
go bankrupt and seems predisposed to both rate relief (more modest than what
the utilities are looking for) and credit guarantees.  His staff has more
work to do on the latter, but he was clearly intrigued with the idea.  He
talked mainly in terms of raising rates but not uncapping them at the retail
level.  He also wants to use what generation he has control over for the
benefit of California consumers, including utility-owned generation (which he
would dedicate to consumers on a cost-plus basis) and excess muni power
(which he estimates at 3000MW).  He foresees a mix of market oriented
solutions as well as interventionist solutions which will allow him to fix
the problem by '02 and provide some political cover.
Our proposals:  I have attached the outline we put in front of him (it also
included the forward price information several of you provided).  He seemed
interested in 1) the buy down of significant demand, 2) the state setting a
goal of x000 MW of new generation by a date certain, 3) getting the utilities
to gradually buy more power forward and 4) setting up a group of rate
analysts and other "nonadvocates" to develop solutions to a number of issues
including designing the portfolio and forward purchase terms for utilities.
He was also quite interested in examining the incentives surrounding LDC gas
purchases.   As already mentioned, he was also favorably disposed to finding
some state sponsored credit support for the utilities.
His ideas:  The gov read from a list of ideas some of which were obviously
under serious consideration and some of which were mere "brainstorming".
Some of these ideas would require legislative action.
State may build (or make build/transfer arrangements) a "couple" of
generation plants.  The gov feels strongly that he has to show consumers that
they are getting something in return for bearing some rate increases.  This
was a frequently recurring theme.
Utilities would sell the output from generation they still own on a cost-plus
basis to consumers.
Municipal utilties would be required to sell their excess generation in
California.
State universities (including UC/CSU and the community colleges) would more
widely deploy distributed generation.
Expand in-state gas production.
Take state lands gas royalties in kind.
negotiate directly with tribes and state governments in the west for
addtional gas supplies.
Empower an existing state agency to approve/coordinate power plant
maintenance schedules to avoid having too much generation out of service at
any one time.
Condition emissions offsets on commitments to sell power longer term in state.
Either eliminate the ISO or sharply curtail its function -- he wants to hear
more about how Nordpool works(Jeff- someone in Schroeder's group should be
able to help out here).
Wants to condition new generation on a commitment to sell in state.  We made
some headway with the idea that he could instead require utilities to buy
some portion of their forward requirements from new in-state generation
thereby accomplishing the same thing without using a command and control
approach with generators.
Securitize uncollected power purchase costs.
To dos: (Jeff, again I'd like to prevail on you to assemble the group's
thoughts and get them to Kari)
He wants to see 5 year fixed power prices for peak/ off-peak and baseload --
not just the 5 one year strips.
He wants comments on his proposals by Tuesday.
He would like thoughts on how to pitch what consumers are getting out of the
deal.
He wants to assemble a group of energy gurus to help sort through some of the
forward contracting issues.
Thanks to everyone for their help.  We made some progress today.


Frank

Please find our approvals from last week consolidated on the attached file.
This should be helpful in reviewing the activity.

Regards
Molly


Executive Summary
? New Extraordinary session opened today
? Forbearance period extended for SoCal
? QFs placing liens on SoCal, moving them closer to bankruptcy
? MOU is dead.  Nation's Plan B, an alternative to the MOU, will become a
bill tomorrow and is gaining interest from both sides of the House.  SoCal
and Davis has yet to give their support.

New Extraordinary Session
Yesterday, the Senate and Assembly passed resolutions to close the
Extraordinary Session.  All bills from the 1st session be introduced into the
2nd session as they were last amended, with the same bill number.

Forbearance Period Extended
Regarding the forbearance extended to SoCal by banker creditors, the parent
company's credit has been extended until 30 June.  The utility's forbearance
is until 15 September.

QFs Placing Liens on SoCal's Assets
The QFs are placing liens against SoCal's assets (property or freezing its
bank assets).  As a result, SoCal is moving ever closer to bankruptcy, maybe
as early as later next week.  These actions on behalf of the QFs are added
incentives for the legislature to move quickly on an alternative to the MOU.

Alternative Plan to the MOU
The MOU for SoCal is essentially deal.  There are a number of alternative
plans being proposed.  The legislature held meetings last night on Democratic
Assemblyman Nation's Plan B alternative to the MOU.  This plan is gaining
momentum.  According to sources, Republican Assembly leader Cox has signed
off for people to work on the plan implying Republican interest.  Senator
Burton's office also reported work on the same Plan B.  Governor Davis'
office is aware of the plan but has yet to comment.  There is also no word at
this time as to whether the Republican Senate leadership is in support of
Nation's Plan B.

Key details of the Nation plan include a $1.2 billion option for the state to
purchase SoCal's transmission assets.  This money would be given to SoCal by
the state regardless of whether the option was exercised, a detail likely to
be unpopular with voters.  The remainder of the undercollect, stated as $3.5
billion or an amount determined by PUC review, would be paid through
securitization of the undercollect by SoCal.  Moreover, the utility would
sell the state additional power at a cost beyond the 10 years already agreed
upon in the memorandum-of-understanding and additional power from other
company sources.   Sources report that the Nation plan also currently calls
for generators to take a 30% haircut.

The Nation Plan B will likely be introduced as a bill tomorrow and will
likely go through start the legislative process by early next week.  The next
scheduled floor session is Thursday; we should be able to tell how fast the
legislature intends to move the bill.  There is no indication whether SoCal
Edison would agree to the Nation plan.  Sources believe it is likely that
SoCal would object to at least some of the plan's provisions (for example, a
PUC audit of SoCal's debt amount to determine the direct rate component to
pay for the undercollect).  SoCal is very much at odds with the PUC and
wishes them to play as little role as possible.  If SoCal does ultimately
agree to the plan, the state reportedly may offer a similar deal to PG&E.


[IMAGE]											[IMAGE]								[IMAGE]
						[IMAGE]											[IMAGE]
						[IMAGE]																					at  Your Neighborhood Right Start Store

																		[IMAGE]								[IMAGE]
																		[IMAGE]								[IMAGE]

										Dear Right Start Customer,

										The Right Startc,  appreciates you shopping at your neighborhood store, and
here are savings  on your next purchase to prove it.

										 At The Right Startc  we reward our preferred customers with special offers
like this Growing-Up  Discount Coupon, good for BIG Discounts on your next
purchase.

									  Click  here to find a Right Start store location near you.									[IMAGE]								[IMAGE]
								[IMAGE]							[IMAGE]											[IMAGE]
						[IMAGE]							[IMAGE]								[IMAGE]
					Deluxe  Sportv Baby Carrier 03300064 $59.95 			[IMAGE]				Alpha  Omega Car Seat
												03340057 $139.95 			[IMAGE]					Kool  Stride Runner - Alloy 03320088 $359.95 						[IMAGE]
																								[IMAGE]
																												*  Redeemable only at The Right Startc stores. Limit one coupon per customer
visit. Coupon must be presented for discount.
																												May not be used for the purchase of gift certificates, catalog merchandise,
online merchandise, or used in conjunction
																												with other offers, discounts, or rewards programs/certificates. Not valid
for  prior purchases. Offer may not be applied to
																												Baby Bjornc, Britaxc, Dutailierc, Fisher-Pricec, Lucy Annc, Maclarenc,
Medelac,  Peg Peregoc, and Stokkec products.
																												Taxes extra. No part of this offer may be reproduced without permission from
The Right Start, Inc. All rights reserved.
																			[IMAGE]
																							If you  do not wish to receive future emails from RightStart.com, please
click  here and we will
																							make every effort to respect your request in accordance with our Privacy
Policy.
[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]


Welcome to eMail News Delivery, a service from Business Wire.
Here is your Industrial Information Resources Inc. news release.
If you have received this in error please send a message to:
eMailDelivery@businesswire.com
with the following command in the body of the message:
 unsubscribe TX-INDUSTRIAL-INFO-RES
If you have questions about this service, please contact your
Business Wire Account Executive or service@businesswire.com

BW2002  JAN 16,2002       2:00 PACIFIC      05:00 EASTERN

( BW)(TX-INDUSTRIAL-INFO-RES) Expansion Plan Ensures that the Virginia
Port Authority Remains Competitive in the 21st Century, in an Advisory
by Industrialinfo.com

    Business Editors

	   HOUSTON--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Jan. 16, 2002--The following is an
advisory by Industrialinfo.com (Industrial Information Resources,
Incorporated; Houston, Texas) In 1995, Virginia Port Authority (VPA)
was faced with a dilemma. A key question was asked: What steps needed
to be taken to ensure the VPA maintained its market share among
competing US East Coast ports? To answer that question, VPA
commissioned a study to be done by a consulting team of maritime
experts. The results of this study would provide VPA with insight into
what steps needed to be taken to meet their long-term goals.
	   The study was completed in June of 1995 and entitled "The VPA 2010
Plan." The Plan focuses on two (2) key areas: Maximizing existing
port-wide cargo handling capabilities and developing new or improved
facilities to handle the market needs of the future. According to the
study, VPA has the potential for a possible 250% increase in
containerized cargo (potential Intermodel volume increase of 300%) by
the year 2010. In addition, breakbulk cargo could increase by 200% in
the same timeframe.
	   To be capable of handling these potential increases in port
capacity, VPA had to take a hard, serious look at its existing
facilities. It was determined that each of their three (3) cargo
terminals would need renovations and expansions future growth.
	   The largest renovation/expansion would have to take place at their
Norfolk International Terminal (NIT). However, renovation/expansion
work would also be taking place at the Newport News Marine Terminal
(NNMT) and the Portsmouth Marine Terminal (PMT).
	   All total, VPA is initially looking at over $334 million worth of
improvements and expansions to help attract the more then 16 million
tons of general cargo forecasted for VPA by 2010. Some of the work
planned includes Intermodel Container transfer facility
renovations/expansions at NIT, a new 4,000 ft wharf at NIT, additional
container/gantry cranes at NIT, NNMT and PMT, the development of an
additional 250 acres of container storage at NIT, the renovation of 81
acres at NIT, the development of an additional 41 acres of container
storage at PMT, additional berths added at NNMT, plus miscellaneous
modifications and renovations at all three (3) terminals.
	   When it is all said and done, VPA is taking the steps necessary to
position themselves as best they can to take advantage of their
potential future to the fullest. Investments, such as those mentioned
above, will ensure that VPA has the capability to maintain their
competitive edge for years to come and hopefully allow them to
increase their market share by 2010.
	   The Port of Virginia is among the largest and most successful
ports on the East Coast. The three (3) VPA Terminals trade with more
then 100 nations and account for an estimated 116,000 jobs throughout
Virginia.
	   Industrialinfo.com provides daily news related to the industrial
market place including industry alerts and databases for the energy
and industrial markets. For more information on trends and upcoming
construction activities for the industrial manufacturing markets as
well as other industrial sectors send inquiries to
industrialmanufacturinggroup@industrialinfo.com or visit us at
www.industrialinfo.com.

    --30--as/na*

    CONTACT: Industrial Information Resources Inc., Houston
             Mike Bergen, 713/783-5147
             www.industrialinfo.com

    KEYWORD: TEXAS CALIFORNIA VIRGINIA
    INDUSTRY KEYWORD: TRANSPORTATION
    SOURCE: Industrial Information Resources

For the best viewing of the news releases please
 use the following email settings:  Courier 10 point.
 -Notice of Copyright and General Disclaimer-
 (c) 2000 Business Wire. All of the releases provided by Business Wire
 are protected by copyright and other applicable laws, treaties and
 conventions. Information contained in the releases is furnished by
 Business Wire`s members who are solely responsible for their content,
 accuracy and originality. All reproduction, other than for an
 individual user`s reference, is prohibited without prior written
 permission.

- Notice of Copyright and General Disclaimer --
(c) 1999 Business Wire. All of the releases provided by Business Wire
are protected by copyright and other applicable laws, treaties and
conventions. Information contained in the releases is furnished by
Business Wire`s members who are solely responsible for their content,
accuracy and originality. All reproduction, other than for an
individual user`s reference, is prohibited without prior written
permission.


look at sitara 588471;588452;588605;596991


Due to the level of interest in Kosciusko and Holmesville capacity, Gulf
South will be holding an Open Season for FT capacity, pursuant to section
7.4 of the Gulf South Tariff.  The capacity becomes available April 1, 2002,
when the existing contracts expire.  Gulf South is selling the capacity for
a term of one year, expiring March 31, 2003.  The capacity available for
sale is:

Agua Dulce (8075) to Kosciusko (2471)		43,000 Dth/day
Agua Dulce (8075) to Holmesville (2690)		32,500 Dth/day
Carthage (664) to Kosciusko (2471)			70,000 Dth/day
Venice (464) to Kosciusko (2471)			20,000 Dth/day
Mobile Bay (15912) to Koscuisko (2471)		20,000 Dth/day
Bistineau (10402) to Koscuisko (2471)		  2,000 Dth/day
Carthage (664) to Holmesville (2690)			  5,000 Dth/day

The above capacity represents the capacity that is currently under contract
on a primary, firm basis.  The Open Season will be held on Tuesday, January
29th, at 2:00 P.M. CCT.  The auction will be held on Gulf South's web site.
Gulf South will post the minimum acceptable rate and supplemental rights the
day before the auction commences.  Each package will be auctioned
separately. Given the bidding history on capacity offered for auction Gulf
South is proposing to auction each package for an initial period of 15
minutes, with extensions if bids are received in the last 60 seconds rather
than the procedures set forth in Section 7.4.  The extensions will continue
until the bidding stops. Gulf South shall post on its Internet web site the
winning bid(s) and the winning bidder(s) within forty-eight hours after the
completion of the auction.  The interactive auction will eliminate the
requirement of section 7.4 to post the capacity for a bid period of 5
business days. Customers' bids shall be for demand fees only.

Gulf South will entertain negotiations for multiple-year FT deals on the
aforementioned capacity through Friday, January 25, 2002, pursuant to Gulf
South's current tariff provisions.  Any multiple-year contracts for the
above capacity will be communicated on Monday, January 28, 2002 via the Gulf
South web site, and will be subject to the posting requirements of section
7.4 of the Gulf South tariff.

If you need information on how to participate in the Gulf South auction,
please contact your account manager.

If you have questions about the capacity to be auctioned, please contact
Dwight Helms at 713-544-7603 or Patrick Howard at 713-544-5402.


A call works.  It will be the Enron commercial lead (Ben Jacoby), Stuart
Zisman, the GE commercial lead and the GE lawyer.  It is about the contract
he prepared (although now I wonder).  If he prefers to have whoever will be
doing the drafting, that's fine, too.

Kay

From: Suzanne Adams@ECT on 11/01/2000 02:55 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Conference call

Paul called me back and said he is available for about an hour at 3pm
tomorrow.  He wanted to know who would be on the call and what it is about.
He said he needed to prepare for the meeting.  He hasn't read the contract,
so if it's regarding same, he needs to know.  Let me know and I'll call him.
Do you prefer his presence or would a call work?

	Kay Mann@ENRON
	11/01/2000 09:50 AM

		 To: Suzanne Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Conference call

Suzanne,

Please call (not email - he doesnt check it) Paul Pipitone (Andrews & Kurth)
and see if he is available for a meeting (or conference call) to discuss the
GE facility agreement sometime tomorrow - either am or after 300.

Thanks,

Kay


Attached is the 2000 Weekly Cost reports.  Please call if you have any
questions.  Thanks Amy 3-7805


When: Tuesday, October 30, 2001 5:00 PM-6:00 PM (GMT-06:00) Central Time (US & Canada).
Where: EB 1724

*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

The purpose of the meeting is to review the method of accrual of tax on the Raptor entities.   Thanks, John.


Yeah I don't remember automatic winning rights either.  Neither do I remember
automatic "whining"  rights.


Attached is a draft from Michelle Cash.


FYI.  These are Ava's duties as we defined last year.  Thanks. Lynn
---------------------- Forwarded by Lynn Blair/ET&S/Enron on 05/29/2001 10:52 AM ---------------------------
   Lynn Blair                08/07/2000 09:23 AM

To:	Sharon Brown/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Patti Rumler/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Alma Carrillo/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Ricki Winters/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Julia White/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Lynn Blair/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Sheila Nacey/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steven January/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Rick Dietz/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Larry Berger/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Raetta Zadow/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jan Moore/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, John Buchanan/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Lynn Blair/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:	Lynn Blair/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject:	Duties

Attached are the Job Duties the Assistance of helped me structure for Ava's desk.
I will be handing this list out to the teams at the next team leader meeting.
If you have any questions, please let me know.  Thanks. Lynn


RYI - re:  Executive Committee holiday gift.  This is a thank you from
Governor Ann Richards' staff.

Rosie
---------------------- Forwarded by Rosalee Fleming/Corp/Enron on 12/13/2000
11:00 AM ---------------------------

Kathy Mayfield
12/13/2000 10:47 AM

To: Rosalee Fleming/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Elyse Kalmans/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Thank you for the Charitygift

---------------------- Forwarded by Kathy Mayfield/Corp/Enron on 12/13/2000
10:22 AM ---------------------------

smallen@verner.com on 12/13/2000 10:12:39 AM
To: kathy.mayfield@enron.com
cc:

Subject: Thank you for the Charitygift

Ms. Mayfield,

Thank you for the Charity Gift holiday greeting card. Governor Richards chose
to donate to Meals on Wheels. On behalf of Governor Richards and Meals on
Wheels, thank you and best wishes on the New Year.

Sincerely,

Sara Allen
Assistant


I passed this information along to some of my direct reports for their
thoughts, and truthfully didn't hear back from anyone and didn't follow up.
Two years ago, we agreed to be part of a benchmarking study that was done by
AA's Houston office (interestingly enough, Wes Colwell was the AA partner who
led this effort) and we had mixed results.  The study was designed to cover
gas and power.  Despite our involvement in the steering committee, the study
itself was very, very detailed, such that it was troublesome to complete.
Jim Fallon at the time refused to submit information on the majority of the
questions surrounding power, so our survey data for power was not very
useful.

I would agree that at this time we will pass on this request.  Thanks for
passing it along, however.  I would be happy to convey this directly  to the
person that has contacted you.  Just let me know his/her name and number and
I will follow through on that if you would like.

Hope that your holidays was enjoyable and that the new year will be a good
one for you.  --Sally

Vince J Kaminski
01/03/2001 03:29 PM
To: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Benchmarking Study

Sally,

I gave you some time ago a brochure on this benchmarking study request.
They renewed their request for Enron's participation.

What is your view on this? Do you think the benefits of knowing what's
going on offset the loss due information released and time spent on the
project.

My recommendation is to forget it.

Vince

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 01/03/2001
03:28 PM ---------------------------

"Theresa Sanders" <TSanders@eei.org> on 12/27/2000 01:32:18 PM
To: <vkamins@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Benchmarking Study

Dear Vince,

Peter Nance and I wanted to follow-up our discussion of Enron's participation
in our benchmarking study.  Have you discussed Enron's participation in the
project with your colleagues?

Here is a small sample set of metrics that were taken from a comprehensive
list of over 700 metrics.  The study group will decide which metrics to use.

With EEI's credibility and Teknecon's technical expertise, we intend to
become the industry standard in benchmarking.  We would very much like to
have Enron participate in the study.

I would be happy to set up another meeting with you and your colleagues with
Peter Nance if you think that would be helpful.

Best regards,

Theresa Sanders
Director of Business Development
Alliance of Energy Suppliers
Edison Electric Institute
Tel: 202-508-5183

 - EEI metrics-short list.xls
 - ebrochure.doc
 - RiskBenc.ppt


For the week of Monday, October 29, 2001:
	www.reliaquote.com
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
 FAMILY SECURITY You work hard to give your family basic life necessities such as food, clothing and a home. You are the key to your family's financial security. Your spouse and children count on you for so much.   OUTSTANDING VALUE Term life insurance makes it possible for you to purchase a significant amount of coverage at an affordable price. It is a small price to pay for your family's protection should misfortune occur.  COMPLETE PROTECTION Term life insurance provides money to help your family should the unthinkable happen. The death benefit can help your family keep food on the table, pay for your children's education and even pay off the mortgage. 	     10-Year Level Term Life Insurance Male/Female Monthly Premiums No Nicotine    $250,000  $500,000 Age Male Female Male Female 35 $10.33 $9.19 $16.19 $14.00 40 $13.30 $11.64 $22.32 $18.82 45 $19.43 $16.63 $35.57 $22.88 50 $29.49 $22.32 $54.69 $40.25 55 $44.89 $32.12 $85.32 $59.94     Sample rates underwritten by First Colony Life Insurance Company. Term life insurance subject to the terms of Policy Form nos. 1420 (96) et al and 1421 et al which includes an exclusion period of death by suicide. Premiums include a $50 annual policy fee. No nicotine use includes use of all nicotine and nicotine substitutes. Subject to state availability and issue limitations. Based on premiums paid monthly. Rates are higher for other underwriting classifications. ReliaQuote Inc. is a licensed insurance agency dba ReliaQuote Insurance Services in CA, license #0C16621.
		 Copyright 2001 ReliaQuote, Inc. All rights reserved.

Important subscription information  Your privacy is extremely important to us. You are receiving this offer because you are a registered subscriber to one of our affiliate sites and have requested to receive recurring mailings. As a leader in permission-based email marketing, we are committed to delivering a highly rewarding experience with offers that include valuable discounts, bargains, special offers, sweepstakes, entertainment, travel and financial opportunities. However, if you feel you have received this message in error or if you wish to unsubscribe, please see the remove instructions at the end of this message.

Thank you for reading our special offers! Please forward this deal alert along to your friends. Have a great day!!!

Email Source Information
 * This email has been sent to you as a subscriber of MediaTrec.com  * To remove yourself from this mailing list, point your browser to: http://www.mediatrec.com/optout.cfm   * Enter your email address in the field provided and click "Unsubscribe".

[IMAGE]


Just FYI,

 The following transaction expires February 29, 2000:

 Transaction #4
 5,000 / day
 Price = 2.71 fixed

 Note:  This volume will roll up into Transaction #1 (excess volume priced at
index + .769)

Thanks.


One more piece of info.  I'll call you shortly.   Thanks.  DF
---------------------- Forwarded by Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron on 02/25/2000
01:42 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Frank Osburn                           02/25/2000 01:32 PM

To: Charlie Graham/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Michel Nelson/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re: FTC Subpoena

A map could be generated depicting the area within an estimated 8 to 12 hr.
period.  This would include pipe and sizes, not pressures.
The data utilized to generate the map would be taken from our annual FERC
map.  We can start at any time just let us know.

Thanks, Frank

	From:  Charlie Graham                           02/25/2000 12:33 PM

To: Frank Osburn/OTS/Enron@ENRON
cc: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Michel Nelson/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: FTC Subpoena

Frank,

I had trouble getting the FAX to go but you should have it by now.  After you
get it reviewed can you answer Drew's question regarding time you would like
to have (ie couple of weeks vs the 2 days given)?

Drew,

Frank is in charge of Engineering Records for ET&S et al and will provide the
maps you deem necessary.  We do not give out pressure information (even for
these subpoena's as I understand it), is that a problem?

Charlie

---------------------- Forwarded by Charlie Graham/ET&S/Enron on 02/25/2000
12:21 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Drew Fossum                           02/25/2000 11:57 AM

To: Sheila Nacey/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Lynn Blair/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steven
January/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Charlie Graham/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Michael Moran/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: FTC Subpoena

I understand that the FTC subpoena I sent to Julia and Mike Nelson yesterday
has found its way to you.  Please give me a call with your thoughts on who is
best situated to help prepare the response and how long it would take.  Mike
Moran and I plan to call the FTC back this PM to discuss so your input would
be helpful.  Thanks for your assistance.  DF


Obviously, this is not final.  But it does have the letterhead.
----- Forwarded by Stacy E Dickson/HOU/ECT on 05/07/2001 11:24 AM -----

	Gregg Penman@ENRON
	05/03/2001 01:06 PM

		 To: Stacy E Dickson/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Steve Richman/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 Subject: Re: Transaction Agreements

Stacy -
Steve spoke with Coral about the Transaction Agreements today.  They had the
following comments:
Transaction Agreement #1
1 - MaxDQ should be 20,346
2 - 3.2 and 3.4 - LD payment equal to $0.15 plus 1.7% x Spot Price rather
than $0.017 x Spot Price

Transaction Agreement #2
1 - 3.2 and 3.4 - LD payments consistent with Transaction Agreement #1 rather
than $0.20 and $0.25

I think these are all fine, but I wanted to run them by you.  I have made the
requested revisions to the attached Agreements for your review.  Let me know
what you think.

Thanks - Gregg

	Stacy E Dickson@ECT
	04/30/2001 10:36 AM

		 To: mdpalmer@coral-energy.com
		 cc: Gregg Penman/Corp/Enron@Enron@ECT, Steve Richman/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 Subject: Transaction Agreements

Mike,

Attached are red-lined versions of the two Transaction Agreements for the
transaction between Coral Energy Resources and enovate which includes the
changes that we discussed.  Please call me at (713) 853-5705 with your
comments.

Stacy


Here's set of any master agreements I need ASAP.

I didn't mention it on the earlier ones, but for all of these, if any of the agreements have been amended, I will need any amendments, as well as any guarantees.  Much thanks!
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Williams, Jason R (Credit)
Sent:	Monday, October 29, 2001 3:56 PM
To:	Jones, Tana
Subject:	Hess relationship

Tana -

We need to pull together all of the contracts with the following:

	Amerada Hess Corporation
	Hess Energy Services Company, LLC
	Hess Energy Trading Company (UK) Limited
	Hess Energy Trading Company LLC

We need to pull together a Master Netting agreement with them ASAP.  Please call me (53923) with any questions.

Thanks,

JRW


Please provide me a list of deal numbers that need to be changed.  From you
email I gather you are saying that all deals done by ENA with a Canadian
Counterparty need to be ECC/3rd party and then flipped to ENA
book/FT-US/Cand/ERMS.  Is this correct?
PL


----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 11/30/2000 08:06 AM -----

	Richard Shapiro
	11/30/2000 07:45 AM

		 To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: NOTICE OF REVOCATION OF INDEPENDENCE

---------------------- Forwarded by Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron on 11/30/2000
07:45 AM ---------------------------
From: Mark Palmer on 11/15/2000 08:57 AM
To: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: NOTICE OF REVOCATION OF INDEPENDENCE

----- Forwarded by Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron on 11/15/2000 08:57 AM -----

	Margaret Allen
	11/15/2000 08:53 AM

		 To: mpalmer@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: NOTICE OF REVOCATION OF INDEPENDENCE

Mark,  you must read this!  Very funny!

...from one of my limey friends....:)

>
>
>
> NOTICE OF REVOCATION OF INDEPENDENCE
> To the citizens of the United States of America,
> In the light of your failure to elect a President of the USA and thus to
> govern yourselves, we hereby give notice of the revocation of your
> independence, effective today.
> Her Sovereign Majesty Queen Elizabeth II will resume monarchical duties
> over all states, commonwealths and other territories.  Except Utah, which
> she does not fancy.  Your new prime minister (The rt. hon. Tony Blair, MP
> for the 97.85% of you who have until now been unaware that there is a
> world outside your borders) will appoint a minister for America without
> the need for further elections.  Congress and the Senate will be
> disbanded.  A questionnaire will be circulated next year to determine
> whether any of you noticed.
> To aid in the transition to a British Crown Dependency, the following
> rules are introduced with immediate effect:
> 1. You should look up "revocation" in the Oxford English Dictionary.
> Then look up "aluminium".  Check the pronunciation guide.  You will be
> amazed at just how wrong you have been pronouncing it.  Generally, you
> should raise your vocabulary to acceptable levels.  Look up "vocabulary".
> Using the same twenty seven words  interspersed with filler noises such as
> "like" and "you know" is an unacceptable and inefficient form of
> communication.  Look up "interspersed".
> 2. There is no such thing as "US English".  We will let Microsoft know
> on your behalf.
> 3. You should learn to distinguish the English and Australian accents.
> It
> really isn't that hard.
>
> 4. Hollywood will be required occasionally to cast English actors as
> the good guys.
> 5. You should relearn your original national anthem, "God Save The
> Queen", but only after fully carrying out task 1.  We would not want you
> to get confused and give up half way through.
> 6. You should stop playing American "football".  There is only one kind
> of football.  What you refer to as American "football" is not a very good
> game.
> The 2.15% of you who are aware that there is a world outside your borders
> may have noticed that no one else plays  "American" football.  You will no
> longer be allowed to play it, and should instead play proper football.
> Initially, it would be best if you played with the girls.  It is a
> difficult game.  Those of you brave enough will, in time, be allowed to
> play rugby (which is similar to American "football", but does not involve
> stopping for a rest every twenty seconds or wearing full kevlar body
> armour like nancies).  We are hoping to get together at least a US rugby
> sevens side by 2005.
> 7. You should declare war on Quebec and France, using nuclear weapons
> if they give you any merde.  The 98.85% of you who were not aware that
> there is a world outside your borders should count yourselves lucky.  The
> Russians have never been the bad guys.  "Merde" is French for "sh*t".
> 8. July 4th is no longer a public holiday.  November 8th will be a new
> national holiday, but only in England.  It will be called "Indecisive
> Day".
> 9. All American cars are hereby banned.  They are crap and it is for
> your own good.  When we show you German cars, you will understand what we
> mean.
> 10. Please tell us who killed JFK.  It's been driving us crazy.
>
> Thank you for your cooperation.
>

This e-mail, its content and any files transmitted with it are intended
solely for the addressee(s) and are confidential and may be legally
privileged.  Access by any other party is unauthorised without the express
prior written permission of the sender.  If you have received this e-mail in
error you may not copy, disclose to any third party or use the contents,
attachments or information in any way.  Please destroy it and contact the
sender via the Thomson Financial switchboard on (44) 207 369 7000 or via
e-mail return.  Internet communications are not secure unless protected using
strong cryptography.  This e-mail has been prepared using information
believed by the author to be reliable and accurate, but Thomson Financial
does not accept responsibility for the timeliness, accuracy or completeness
of the information provided or for any changes to this e-mail, howsoever
made, after it was sent.  [The content of this e-mail and files transmitted
with it is  (c) TFSL - 2000]


Brian,  Mark forward the executed docs. to me.  The Trailblazer Assignment
was not included.  I have attached the assignment in case you don't have the
one I forwarded earlier.  Please execute and return.   Also the Amended and
Restated Transaction No. 2 was initialled, but was not executed.  I am
forwarding those back to you for execution.  Thanks for your cooperation.


Hi Rhett, I'm working on one of these turbine transfers via the sale of 80%
of the equity of the LLC.  I'll forward the operative docs to you right
away.  In any event, here's a change the counterparty wants to the tax
language in the letter agreement.

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 04/03/2001 01:26
PM ---------------------------

"Pepe-Robbins, Suzanne M." <suzannepepe@paulhastings.com> on 04/03/2001
01:17:03 PM
To: "'kay.mann@enron.com'" <kay.mann@enron.com>, "'ccampbell@kslaw.com'"
<ccampbell@kslaw.com>
cc: "Lang, Gregory F." <gregorylang@paulhastings.com>

Subject: Pegasus

Hi, attached is draft language:

"substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibit A, provided that the
LLC Agreement may differ from such form in such respects (which may or may
not be substantial, but which shall not affect the economic rights of the
parties thereto) as may be necessary or desirable to properly reflect
[Pegasus as the sole owner] [the treatment] of the LLC for federal income tax
purposes"

Please feel free to call me with any questions.
_____________
Suzanne Pepe
Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker LLP
1055 Washington Blvd.
Stamford, Connecticut 06901
Note New E-Mail suzannepepe@paulhastings.com
Phone: (203) 961-7432
Fax (general):  (203) 359-3031
Fax (dedicated): (203) 674-7632

"paulhastings.com" made the following annotations on 04/03/01 14:17:08
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NEW E-MAIL ADDRESSES AT PAUL, HASTINGS, JANOFSKY & WALKER LLP

We have changed our e-mail address. Our new domain name is paulhastings.com.
In most cases, our address is composed of conventional first name and last
name plus @paulhastings.com. Here are two examples:
janesmith@paulhastings.com and danjones@paulhastings.com. If you have any
questions, please contact us at noc@paulhastings.com.

==============================================================================
"The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to
which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged
material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or
taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or
entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received
this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from all
computers."

==============================================================================


499013 was changed to a price of 180. Mike is having the broker pull their
tapes for today, but we won't get that information until tomorrow. In the
meantime, we're giving them the benefit of the doubt. I'll let you know if
anything else changes.

Thanks,
Kate

Kerri Thompson@ENRON
01/17/2001 02:23 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: apb checkout

498837 not apb

499013  should be 180.00

thanks


I'm already perfect :)

---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 07/19/2000
09:20 PM ---------------------------

David Oxley
07/19/2000 05:20 PM
To: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Kay Chapman/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Get your thumbscrews out

Dave,

Since you're on the list do you need we to get something scheduled with Kay?

David
---------------------- Forwarded by David Oxley/HOU/ECT on 07/19/2000 05:18
PM ---------------------------

Tim O'Rourke@ENRON
07/18/2000 05:05 PM
To: David Oxley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Hoyt Thomas/NA/Enron@Enron, Kim
Melodick/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheila Walton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Amy FitzPatrick/PDX/ECT@ECT,
Cindy Skinner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Fran L Mayes/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Get your thumbscrews out

Folks,
Attached is a list of 37 executives, not yet enrolled on the "exective impact
and influence" programme administered by Dick Amabile.
The OTC clearly set the goal at the beginning of the year, and repeated again
at Mid year, that all VPs and MDs need to have attended this programme by end
of year 2000. Their attendance does form part of the discussions on the VPs
and MDs at the executive PRC.

Despite repeated comms from the OTC, these 37 names have not yet enrolled (or
cancelled off a programme and have not re-enrolled).

HR has committed to making sure that these people are enrolled, so the
suggestion is that the named HR rep in the attachment takes 5 minutes to meet
with the individuals, explain that they need to do this, show them the list
of dates, and get them to choose which programme they want to enrol on.
Please do not leave that meeting without a date! A word of caution, it is
remotely possible that some of these individuals may have enrolled in the
very recent past, or have attended and this data not yet reached Dick's
spreadsheet, so do double check that they haven't yet enrolled before
twisting their arms..

The dates for the remaining programmes are also on the spreadsheet.

To enrol a VP or MD,  get their dates, give it to their assistants and tell
them to directly contact Debbie Nowak on 33304.

Tim


Alan

Russell says he would like to go through his recorded conversations with
Hyundai to refresh his memory. He has asked to the meeting with WFW to be on
Tuesday (5 Oct). I will try to schedule Suzanne's and Neale's attendance for
Tuesday, and update you after the meeting.

Matt

Alan Aronowitz
09/30/99 10:11 PM
To: Matthias Lee/SIN/ECT@ECT
cc: Anita Fam/SIN/ECT@ECT, Angeline Poon/SIN/ECT@ECT, Richard B
Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: "PACIFIC VALOUR"

Matt:

Please advise as to any update after Neale/Suzanne soeak with Russell and
Sheila reagrding the conversations with Hyundai. Thanks.

Matthias Lee
09/29/99 08:23 PM
To: Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Anita Fam/SIN/ECT@ECT
cc: Angeline Poon/SIN/ECT@ECT
Subject: "PACIFIC VALOUR"

FYI.

Matt
---------------------- Forwarded by Matthias Lee/SIN/ECT on 09/30/99 09:15 AM
---------------------------

akwan@wfw.com on 09/29/99 06:57:30 PM
To: Matthias Lee/SIN/ECT@ECT
cc: ngregson@wfw.com, sbainbridge@wfw.com

Subject: "PACIFIC VALOUR"

Dear Matt

I refer to our discussions today.  We have reviewed the transcript between
Russell and Hyundai, together with the cited case which neatly summarises many
of the principles of repudiation and affirmation.

On its own, we do not consider that the transcript changes the position.  (We
are assuming that this conversation was the last before parties began to
communicate only in writing).  Although we agree that Hyundai's position is
somewhat equivocal in this fax, it was superceded by later written
correspondence which gives a timeframe for Hyundai to affirm the contract or
accept Enron's breach.  The later responses from Hyundai seems clear in its
acceptance of repudiation.

However, both Neale and I think it might be a good idea if we speak with
Russell
and Sheila together with you (perhaps with a view to taking short statements
from them).  If both their views are that Hyundai were equivocal in various
conversations and given Hyundai's earlier rather relaxed attitude to vessel
nomination, there may be some scope for constructing a stronger case that they
elected to affirm the contract.

If this suits, both Neale and I would be free Friday morning or late
afternoon.

Best regards

Suzanne


Susan/Nancy,

Please move the following books from J_ARNOLD to M_MAGGI portfolio:

 NG-ERMS-XL-PRC
 NG-EXOTIC-PRC

Thanks,
Robin


----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 12/27/2000 10:55 AM -----

	Jeff Dasovich
	Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
	12/26/2000 03:15 PM

		 To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT, Dennis
Benevides/HOU/EES@EES, Eric Letke/DUB/EES@EES, George McClellan/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@ENRON, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@ENRON, Jennifer
Rudolph/HOU/EES@EES, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kevin
McGowan/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Lisa Yoho/NA/Enron@ENRON, Lysa Akin/PDX/ECT@ECT,
Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Richard
Shapiro/NA/Enron@ENRON, Roger Yang/SFO/EES@EES, Sandra
McCubbin/NA/Enron@ENRON, Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Scott
Stoness/HOU/EES@EES, skean@enron.com, Stuart Staley/LON/ECT@ECT, Susan J
Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES@EES, Wanda Curry/HOU/EES@EES,
MDay@GMSSR.com, Robert C Williams/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Mike D
Smith/HOU/EES@EES
		 cc:
		 Subject: DRAFT talking points for California PUC Hearings on the 27th/28th

Attached is a draft of the talking points for the Commission's hearings.  Few
points:
Our time is likely to be limited to 5-10 minutes.
Mike Day, our outside counsel, will make the presentation on our behalf.
Mike Day is fleshing out the legal details of our presentation and he will
forward that along for folks review later today.
Comments can be forwarded to me via email, pager (888.916.7184), voicemail
(415.782.7822), or home (415.621.8317).
We will finalize the message points on tomorrow's daily call (10 AM CST).
The call in number is 800.713.8600.  Code is 80435.
The Commission's hearings begin tomorrow at 10 AM (PST).


As I understand it, the meeting is planned for the full day (including
lunch), although I do not know the exact starting time.  John Odam, the
mediator, will most likely set the time.  Because Enron in-house counsel
duties are shifting from Kenton to Richard Sanders, Twanda Sweet (Richard's
assistant) will be finishing the details of the meeting.  I am forwarding the
information I have to Twanda so she can finish up the details and get this
information out to all interested parties. I can tell you that the mediation
will be held at the Enron Building at 1400 Smith Street in Houston.  A
conference room and 3-4 breakout rooms have been reserved.  If you have any
other questions, Twanda's # is 713-853-9402.  Richard Sanders # is
713-853-5587.

	DHASSEM@citgo.com
	05/23/00 11:11 AM

		 To: Cheryl Kondo/Enron Communications@Enron Communications
		 cc:
		 Subject: RE: Citgo Pipeline rupture

What are the actual meeting times for the meeting on June 8th, and what is
the floor or room number and street address for the meeting place?  Thanks.

> ----------
> From:  Cheryl_Kondo@enron.net[SMTP:Cheryl_Kondo@enron.net]
> Sent:  Tuesday, May 23, 2000 12:40 PM
> To:  johne@wildeconst.com; Stogsdill, Dale; Hasseman, Dean; Merdian,
> Jane; jjohanso@bechtel.com
> Cc:  Kenton_Erwin@enron.net; Richard_B_Sanders@ECT.enron.net.citgo.com;
> twanda.sweet@enron.com; cheryl_kondo@enron.net
> Subject:  Citgo Pipeline rupture
>
>
>
> This is to inform you that Richard Sanders will be taking over for Kenton
> Erwin
> as in-house counsel in the above matter.  Richard is the Enron North
> America
> attorney who manages litigation matters and will attend the June 8
> mediation.
> Richard's phone number in Houston is 713-853-5587.  Please direct all
> future
> questions and comments to Richard.
>
>

 - att1.htm


Samantha Boyd will not be in until around 9:30 a.m; she is taking care of
family matters.  If you should need assistance, feel free to contact me at
5-3317.
Thank you, Keegan Farrell


An additional change control has been entered for this week....

Mar. 2
From 10:30 p.m. through 3/3 at 2:00 a.m., the Corporate Server team will perform maintenance on the application cluster server.  This change will affect applications located on the R drive.  This change will not affect gas control.

ETS Solution Center - Houston, at 713-345-4745
 ETS Solution Center - Omaha, at 402-398-7454


This memo is to remind you of the QBR that is scheduled for tomorrow for the
East Mid Market

   Date:   8/18/00
   Time:   8:30 - 11:30 am
   Place:   EB 3314
   Topic:   East Mid Market

Please contact either Kay (3x0643) or Beverly (5x7857) if you have any
questions.


This is to remind you that various anonymous reporting facilities are
available for you to report violations of Company policy and suspected
criminal conduct by any officer, employee, or agent of the Company relating
to the performance of his or her duties.  These reporting facilities are also
available for your questions, messages, comments, and suggestions.

 Any policy violation or criminal conduct may be reported by letter, E-mail,
or voice mail, as set forth below, describing the suspected violation or
criminal conduct with as much detail as possible to allow the Company to
conduct an investigation of the reported matter.

1. Letters should be sent to the Confidential Post Office Box:

Enron Compliance Officer
Confidential - Conduct of Business Affairs
P. O. Box 1188
Houston, Texas  77251-1188

2. E-mails should be sent to the Office of the Chairman,s E-mail box:
Employees with Enron E-mail can access this box by sending an E-mail to the
Office of the Chairman.  Simply type &Office of the Chairman8 in the address
box, type your message, and send.  Your message will be completely
anonymous.  If, however, you copy your message and E-mail it to someone else,
the copy will not be anonymous.

3. Voice mail messages should be left with the Office of the Chairman
PhoneMail Box.  You can access the Office of the Chairman PhoneMail Box by
calling (713) 853-7294.  If you call from your extension or an outside line,
your message will be completely anonymous.  If, however, you access the
PhoneMail Box while you are in the PhoneMail system, your message will not be
anonymous.

 You may, but are not required to, identify yourself.  If you would like to
identify yourself, please submit your name and phone number with your letter
or message.  All anonymously reported matters will be investigated and acted
upon in the same manner as those that contain signatures.

 The Company takes great pride in ensuring that Enron is a great place to
work.  We encourage each employee to continue to conduct the business affairs
of the Company in accordance with all applicable laws and in a moral and
honest manner.


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 02/04/2000
06:10 PM ---------------------------

edward kao <EKao@UH.EDU> on 02/03/2000 08:22:05 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Your talk on 2/7/00 (Monday) (fwd)

Vince:  A minor revision of my earlier email shown below.  The last line
should read ' I will be waiting in my office from 6:30-6:50 for your call
...'  My office phone is 713 743 4716.  Sorry that I have to resend this
email.  Ed

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2000 08:17:40 -0600 (CST)
From: edward kao <disc5fz@Bayou.UH.EDU>
To: Vince J Kaminski <vkamins@ect.enron.com>
Subject: Your talk on 2/7/00 (Monday)

Dear Vince:

      I would like to send out an annoucement about your talk in my Risk
Management in the Energy Sector course on February 7, Monday.  Is it
correct that the name of your talk will be "Commodity Trading in the
Energy Sector".  You indicated that you would be using transparencies so
we have a projector ready for you.  Please let me know if there is
anything else you need for the talk.  Please also confirm this at your
earliest convenience so that I can get announcement sent out soon.  Thanks
in advance for the talk.  We all look forward to meeting you Monday.
Best regards,  Ed
PS.  The class meet 7:00-8:20 pm at 117 Meclcher Hall. As we originally
planned, I will be waiting in my office from 6:30-6:50 and greet you at
the parking lot IE.


It was Mark wilson who is no longer here.  I am trying to get a new name from the London people.

Assuming they approve this what is the turnaround you think?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Shackleton, Sara
Sent:	Wednesday, November 07, 2001 11:57 AM
To:	Doukas, Tom
Cc:	Heard, Marie
Subject:	RE: credit Guaranty

Who is your credit approval person?  Please have that person email or call Marie and me.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Doukas, Tom
Sent:	Wednesday, November 07, 2001 11:48 AM
To:	Shackleton, Sara
Cc:	Wall, David; Hemsley, Simon; Heard, Marie
Subject:	credit Guaranty

Sara,

I just left you a voice mail about this.

We need to amend the Bear guaranty to cover the new ECT Europe Finance that we moved the Anker positions into.  By amending the guanranty I can free up $2.5mm cash.

Please tell me if this can happen.

Thanks,

Tom


Please print these out for me and put them in the Commodity Logic file.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Greenberg, Mark
Sent:	Friday, July 13, 2001 11:05 PM
To:	Taylor, Mark E (Legal)
Subject:	CommodityLogic

Mark -

Sorry for the delay on the CommodityLogic information.  We completed a few documents today and I wanted to make sure you had the final versions.  Also, FYI, Tom has a meeting with Greg on Monday to discuss the creation of a separate CommodityLogic entity.  He has invited me to attend.  Please let me know if you want to attend or have any issues or items you want addressed.

Below are the latest versions of the CL documents.  Let me know if you have any questions or comments.

Mark


Hey Marc - I was in New Orleans last week, NYC & DC the week before.  Now
back home & ready to relax a bit.  Hope you guys came through the storm ok
this morning.  Our cars are stuck in the garage because the alley is filled
with downed tree branches.  I'm not even sure who to call to get it cleared
out.  Ted got a ride from a friend and I took a cab.  Let's get together soon!

Mark


Gary/Scott--

I believe that this was not meant for public distribution, but it is a sentiment that I thought you should hear.

Michelle

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	FLO-Mike Croall <Mike.Croall@nepco.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Tuesday, October 23, 2001 8:53 AM
To:	Cash, Michelle
Subject:	RE: Weigle EEOC File

Michelle,
We may reap the most benefit by having all the site HR Managers, Site Safety
Supervisors/Nurse Practitioners, Mike Indivero, Tony Bolar Softich(Safety),
Steve Olenik(Safety), Sean Mayer(Construction), Frank Petty(Director of
Construction), Mike Ranz(VP Construction), Bob Black(Manager Of Projects),
maybe a few other home office construction managers selected by Mike Ranz or
Frank Petty in attendance. I think you and Rick need to chair the meeting
because you will lend credibility and importance to the issue. You may even
want to invite whoever is John Gillis's boss(or his designee) to sit in to
emphasize the importance of this issue. Too often I hear "Enron has plenty
of money" and "Thats why we have lawyers" -the truth being we are the
guardians of our stockholders assets and we have a fudiciary responsibility
to protect those assets for the health and well being of the company, the
stockholders and the employees of Enron Corp. My experience has been that we
do a good deal of back stabbing and finger pointing when HR, Safety and
Construction get together and meet on anything. Liability/Settlement checks
regardless of the amount needs to be an issue along with the improvement of
the employment offer process and who is authorized to make decisions
effecting employment offers. In the end if supervisors or managers fail to
act prudently and in the best interest of the company then there is a
penalty. The penalty being they won't get the opportunity to lose more of
the companies money by making reckless decisions. Thats the approach I would
take with these people. The Weigle case does not need to be looked at like
it only cost us $490.00. This continued reckless disregard we have in our
decision making process is going to hit us big one of these days and we will
replace Foster Wheeler's Blue Island Racial Graffitti charge & settlement as
something the EPC Industry talks about. I may be overreacting here but I've
been in the middle of Nepco's harassment, discrimination other issues for
the last 18 months. Call me if you have any questions. Thanks for asking.
Mie
> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Michelle.Cash@enron.com [SMTP:Michelle.Cash@enron.com]
> Sent:	Tuesday, October 23, 2001 6:07 AM
> To:	Mike.Croall@nepco.com
> Subject:	RE: Weigle EEOC File
>
> Mike, I received the file - thanks.
>
> Also, I would like to follow up on the training issues that we discussed
> when this charge arose.  How would you like to move forward on that?
>
> Michelle
>
>    -----Original Message-----
>    From: FLO-Mike Croall <Mike.Croall@nepco.com>@ENRON
>    Sent: Fri 10/19/2001 2:28 PM
>    To: Cash, Michelle
>    Cc:
>    Subject: RE: Weigle EEOC File
>
>
>
>    I have made a copy for Nepco's HR Dept. and I am sending all original
>
>    documents related to the charge to your attention Legal Dept. @ Enron
>    1400
>
>    Smith St. Houston, TX. You should have it early next week.Let me know
> if
>    you
>
>    need anything else and I really appreciate all of the time and effort
>    you
>
>    and Rick lent to this issue. I'm sorry we didn't handle it better and
>    avoid
>
>    the EEOC charge.
>
>    Mike Croall
>
>
>    > -----Original Message-----
>
>    > From: Cash, Michelle [SMTP:Michelle.Cash@ENRON.com]
>
>    > Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 3:10 PM
>
>    > To:   Mike.Indivero@nepco.com@ENRON; Mike.Croall@nepco.com; Indivero,
>
>    > Michael
>
>    > Cc:   Johnson, Rick
>
>    > Subject:      RE: Weigle EEOC File
>
>    >
>
>    > As I mentioned earlier, I believe that the original should come to me
>
>    > for filing in the vault.  michelle
>
>    >
>
>    > >  -----Original Message-----
>
>    > > From:       Mike.Indivero@nepco.com@ENRON
>
>    > > Sent:       Friday, October 19, 2001 1:20 PM
>
>    > > To: Mike.Croall@nepco.com; Indivero, Michael
>
>    > > Cc: Johnson, Rick; Cash, Michelle
>
>    > > Subject:    RE: Weigle EEOC File
>
>    > >
>
>    > > suggest you send it here...
>
>    > >
>
>    > > >  -----Original Message-----
>
>    > > > From:     FLO-Mike Croall
>
>    > > > Sent:     Friday, October 19, 2001 11:05 AM
>
>    > > > To:       B-Mike Indivero
>
>    > > > Cc:       'Rick.Johnson@Enron.com'; 'Michelle.Cash@Enron.com'
>
>    > > > Subject:  Weigle EEOC File
>
>    > > >
>
>    > > > I have received the settlement agreement back from Mr. Weigle.
> Who
>
>    > > wants
>
>    > > > to be the keeper of the file? I can send copies to everyone if
>
>    > > necessary.
>
>    > > > Thanks,
>
>    > > > Mike
>
>    >
>
>    >
>
>    >
> **********************************************************************
>
>    > This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant
>    affiliate
>
>    > and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use
>    of
>
>    > the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or
>    disclosure by
>
>    > others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient
>    (or
>
>    > authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender
> or
>
>    > reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and
>
>    > delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments
>    hereto)
>
>    > are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create
>    or
>
>    > evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or
>    any of
>
>    > its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and
> may
>    not
>
>    > be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or
>
>    > otherwise. Thank you.
>
>    >
> **********************************************************************


fyi
---------------------- Forwarded by Marty Sunde/HOU/EES on 12/28/2000 11:24
AM ---------------------------

Scott Stoness
12/28/2000 11:23 AM
To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Roger Yang/SFO/EES@EES
cc: Marty Sunde/HOU/EES@EES
Subject: Argument to Davis re Utilities are not short of Assets

I understand from our conversation today that Lay is going to give the
following theme to Davis:
Need thoughful time to consider value of assets, ongoing structure etc.
CA needs generation
CA needs conservation

As I mentioned in the meeting today: I would add:
Utility solvency problems are not as pressing as they make them out to be.
Assuming that they  own 10,000 MW of generation with book costs of $50/MWh.
Assuming that the 2001 power costs are $150/MWh alone, would allow an
increase in the value of these assets by $13billion dollars.      The
government could offer to take over the assets today for about $22b (2001,
2002, and original estimated value), leaving the utilities with enough money
to pay for existing debt plus whatever debt they are likely to incurr to the
end of 2001.  They are trying to steal this value by threatening bancruptcy.


Here

---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 12/28/99 08:20
AM ---------------------------

pdrexel@columbiaenergygroup.com on 12/27/99 03:15:16 PM
To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: NIMO JAN 2000

Chris this is capacity we got from NIMO as part of a peaking deal with them,
they can call on gas delivered to their gate,they reimburse for all cost at a
north point gas daily price plus 100% transport.  We in essance can sell the
capacity off on a monthly basis (sell it delivered)  NIMO would not allow us
to
use this as part of our transport to our enduses though, we also have capacity
for that.

Chris_Germany@enron.com on 12/27/99 02:52:40 PM
Please respond to Chris_Germany@enron.com

To: John Hodge [NOTES.jwhodge]@LMSOV, Paul
Drexelius/CES/ColumbiaGas@COLUMBIAGAS
cc:

Subject: Re: NIMO JAN 2000

How much of the NIMO capacity (about 15,000 day of North to North) was
dedicated
to retail?

From what I'm seeing, the retail volumes are looking fairly small.

pdrexel@columbiaenergygroup.com on 12/27/99 02:39:46 PM

To:   Dan Junek/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:  NIMO JAN 2000

Here are some more
---------------------- Forwarded by Paul Drexelius/CES/ColumbiaGas on
12/27/2000 02:45 PM ---------------------------

Heidi Boyd
12/27/99 02:25 PM

To: Morgan Sharifi/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas
cc: Noel Bartlo/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas, Paul
Drexelius/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas
Subject: NIMO JAN 2000

FINAL

Hi Morgan,

Please schedule the following (in DTH's) off of CNG to Niagra Mohawk:

Pooled  East Meter 20550 821/day
  West Meter 20500    421/ day

Balanced East Meter 20550 381/day
(firm)  West Meter 20500 430/day

Thanks!


Robert Bradley asked me to forward this presentation to you.

Thanks
Katrina B.


Charlie,

Need some pricing as follows:

Term: 1 Yr. starting June 2000  No cost collar with $4.00 Floor
 2 Yrs. starting June 2001  No cost collar with $4.00 Floor
 Nov 2001 - Mar 2001  No cost collar with $4.50 Floor

Additionally, what would be the cost of the call only for the aformentioned
term(s).

Please leave this information on my voicemail by the end of today.  Thanks.
t

what is the cost of a call in the collar


Me bored??  I think you must be more bored than me to talk about ear
cleaning.  There's this new person that sits down the row from me and she
baby talks...what's up with that!  It's so irritating.  Well now that I've
gossipped about someone 10ft from me I better send this email before someone
walks by and reads it.  I think I'll skip the run this week.

RR


Please see my comments in the attached which work off of Herman's comments.

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Manis, Herman
Sent: Tuesday, May  1, 2001 11:34 AM
To: Mann, Kay; Fleenor, William
Cc: Engeldorf, Roseann; Bills, Lisa; Clark, Catherine
Subject: RE: form of option

See comments therein.  We should discuss presentation.

 << File: FORM - Option to Purchase Real Estate (Kay's revisions2).doc >>

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Mann, Kay
Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2001 10:22 AM
To: Manis, Herman; Fleenor, William
Cc: Engeldorf, Roseann; Bills, Lisa; Clark, Catherine
Subject: form of option

Here's the long awaited form of option for your review and comment.

 << File: FORM - Option to Purchase Real Estate (Kay's revisions2).doc >>

I'm sending it to Rose, Lisa and Catherine for their review also.

Thanks,

Kay


Mark

As mentioned at our trading meeting on Tuesday, we are putting together a
tailored ISDA schedule for our banking counterparties with which we propose
to trade credit transactions.

One issue we have revisited is whether the definition of Specified
Indebtedness (which ties into the cross default provisions) should be
expanded to cover derivatives transactions as well as the more conventional
bank borrowings.

We think there are arguments both ways on this, but wonder whether we have a
"house view".  Since the definition is not expanded in our standard ISDA
schedule, we assume that our preferred position is to exclude derivatives
transactions from the cross default provisions of the ISDA.

Perhaps we can discuss this when you have a spare moment! Thanks

Kind regards.

Paul


How's it going? Fine I hope we are all o.k. It is finally cooling off a
little. It was awful this past week.
                   I heard you were in Cobo for the weekend. Did you have
fun. Paul called Monday and said you had gone.
                       So how are things going with you. I guess your busy.
What's new going on.
                   Talked to Sharon since they got back from their
honeymoon, they said they had a real good time the weather was wonderful.
                                                   Well all for now talk to
you soon..........Dad and I send our love

MOM


These have been changed to Firm energy.

Kate

	From:  Sharen Cason                           03/02/2001 11:23 AM

To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: energy type

I've got two deals where the energy type and del point don't match.

#536538
#536537

Thanks!


Please find attached the minutes from the April 3, 2001, PRC Committee
Meeting:

If you have any question, please feel free to call Gina @ 5-3377 or Jackie @
5-3563

Regards,

Dave


OPEN ENROLLMENT 2001 DEADLINE EXTENDED

Due to a very heavy, last minute influx of employees trying to make elections
and/or changes to their 2001 benefits, the open enrollment 2001 deadline has
been extended until 5pm Central Time on Friday, November 17th.

Please continue to access the web at www.enron.benefitsnow.com or the IVR at
1-800-425-5864.

You must have your 2001 open enrollment personal worksheet that contains your
personal identification number (PIN - located in the upper right hand corner
of your worksheet) in order to access the web or IVR.


A release of TDS will go out tonight (5:00 pm) with the following
enhancements.  TDS will be unavailable from 5-6pm tonight & positions will be
gone when it comes back.

Position Load
- Will now be off new TDS Flag on the Port Calc screen.  This is only on the
Port Calc Screen we hope to add it to Meta Calc in the next few weeks

Position Manager
- Added new tab with to show curve values

Deal Ticker
- Change Deal Value
 * Current Known Bugs - If you reload a position, deals that have switched
desk will not repost
 * Current month deals that have Settle prices in ERMS & the prices have not
been updated in the curve files will value incorrectly
- Killed deals will show up in changed deals (This includes changing desk)

Other improvements have been made to increase speed and reliability.

I will be here tonight & tomorrow morning.  After that call Kenny Ha x30413
with any issues.

Bill
x5-7579


<<5-22-01.pdf>>
Richard Costigan, III
Chief of Staff
Office of the Assembly Republican Leader
California State Assembly
Phone:(916) 319-2005

 - 5-22-01.pdf


UPDATE:  AT THIS TIME, OUR GROUP PARTICIPATION IN UNITED WAY IS ONLY 50%

PLEASE TAKE A MINUTE TO FILL OUT YOUR UNITED WAY PLEDGE TODAY.

You can do so by clicking on the following link:  http://unitedway.enron.com


Tanya,

As we discussed in the last meeting, to simulate secondary power curve we need correlated jump sizes. This is totally different from the current secondary price curve simulation which assume the perfect correlation and also totally different from the secondary GAS basis curve simulation which is based on the hedging ratio.

There are two more issues on my side I need to resolve:
1. I want resolve the power basis curve issue.  Currently all power position on these basis curve are actually price positions.  We are hard coding this: if power basis we add basis to corresponding region curve.  I am trying to remove this hard coding by asking loading the price curve for all these basis locations.

2. Same is true for all those Power F curves.  These curves looks similar to those basis curves.  Currently we just directly map these F curves to the corresponding region curves.  I would also prefer to load the price curves instead of the price differences.

From research, I need those jump size correlations.

Clearly, all these involve many new development, unless we want to use simpler way to simulate secondary power curves.

Regards,

Winston

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Tamarchenko, Tanya
Sent:	Monday, April 16, 2001 9:17 AM
To:	Lew, Jaesoo
Cc:	Gorny, Vladimir; Jia, Winston; Kaminski, Vince
Subject:	Re: clustering for power

Jaesoo,
as we discussed last week on Wednesday meeting can you, please,
implement clustering for power curves by geographical region. This involves the following:

1. Deciding together with Risk Control how many geographical regions we want to use
and which Enron's curves belong to each region.
2. Deciding together with Risk Control how to choose core curves for each region. This decision can
be maid based on the a) position size; b) statistical analysis. There might be other considerations.
3. Doing regression analysis for each curve versus the corresponding core curve.

Winston,
can is it possible to run VAR for the clustering results obtained by Jaesoo with clustering done by SAS?
Should we wait for the stage re-fresh and what is the status on this?

Tanya.


Shelley, these comments look good.  I think they properly set forth  a
structure to provide for these items as the entire market develops not prior
to the service availability.  Most importantly, GISB isn't the business
driver-  others please comment.   Remember,we aren't against its a
timing/complete evaluation of the impacts to other service that hasn't been
dealt with.  MK
---------------------- Forwarded by Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron on 12/08/2000
04:32 PM ---------------------------

Shelley Corman
12/08/2000 03:42 PM
To: Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Teb Lokey/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Rita
Bianchi/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary Darveaux/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Tamara
Hopkins/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Julia White/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, James
Studebaker/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Shahnaz Lakho/FGT/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Comments to GISB Opposing Partial Day Recalls

FYI - Attached are the comments that I prepared for the pipeline segment to
submit prior to the GISB EC vote next week on partial day recall.


I do

DG


Yesterday Jeff Fawcett, Lee Ferrell and I met with Dynegy marketing and
legal/regulatory representatives regarding TW Transport Options.  Overall the
meeting was very positive.  We had nothing but encouraging remarks from the
marketing representatives.  However, the regulatory people (Sarah Tomalty, Ed
Ross) had a couple of issues.  The biggest issue is a marketing affiliate
concern.  Apparently Dynegy is on a crusade at FERC to place further limits
on deals pipelines can do with their marketing affiliates.  They have run
into situations in which pipelines (examples:  Koch, El Paso) have blatantly
favored their marketing affiliates to the extent that Dynegy cannot even do
deals with them.  (In fact, one of the problems with Koch has been Koch's
price option deals with its affiliate.)  The perception is that the
affiliates, by using "funny money," can always make themselves the highest
bidder, with a net benefit to the entire organization (pipeline +
affiliate).  The remedy Dynegy is proposing is to require a marketing
affiliate, if it is the highest bidder, to credit back the difference between
the price it pays and the price offered by the next highest bidder.  The
presumption is that the affiliate has an unfair advantage because it is able
to pay above market value in order to get the capacity.   Dynegy's proposal
would encourage affiliates to pay "real" dollars.

While it emphasized its belief that TW does not favor its marketing
affiliates, Dynegy would like for us to include in our filing some limitation
on options transactions with marketing affiliates.   It is likely that other
pipelines will file for the ability to sell options once FERC approves our
filing, and Dynegy would like for this type of protection to be part of the
precedent set by our filing.  Ed hinted that FERC may be considering a
divestiture requirement for marketing affiliates, and that pipelines can
avoid this extreme result by voluntarily limiting their transactions with
affiliates.  Shelley, I know you've discussed this issue with Ed already and
our reactions were the same.  Basically we politely told Dynegy that we don't
believe we're part of the problem and that we are therefore not inclined to
unnecessarily disadvantage our company by further limiting ENA's ability to
do business with TW.   We can probably expect an intervention with comments
or a limited protest addressing the issue.

The other regulatory question was whether we intend to file each option deal
as a negotiated rate.  My analysis of this issue is that since we're
proposing the option fee as part of the transport rate, options would always
be a type of negotiated rate and would need to be filed.  If you think this
is not the right answer, please let me know because we need to decide it
before we file the tariff sheets.  Sarah's question seemed to be more one of
curiosity rather than a basis for protest.

Like the Indicated Shippers, Dynegy appeared interested in an all-customer
meeting to discuss the service.  Jeff and the rest of the commercial group
are looking further into whether and when we would have such a meeting.

If you have any questions or concerns please let me know.


As an aside?.
	Normal			Historical Vol
Corp		$105.6MM		$112.2MM
Americas	$96.3MM		$101.9MM
Gas VAR	$52.9MM		$55.4MM		*CVAR shows April 02 as having largest risk $23MM
Power VAR	$50.5MM		$52.77MM


Sell 50 Contracts NYMEX May, 2001 @ $5.69
Buy 50 Contracts NYMEX May, 2001 @ $5.49

My Calculation of your April Activity is $66,000.


Yes...except I'm sure it will take six more months before they have all of the information changed in the system.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	LaGesse, Denise
Sent:	Thursday, May 10, 2001 2:10 PM
To:	Scott, Susan M.
Subject:	RE: diverseworks fax

Sorry.  I knew that!  I bet you'll be glad when she gets married this month and changes her name!

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Scott, Susan M.
Sent:	Thursday, May 10, 2001 2:07 PM
To:	LaGesse, Denise
Cc:	Scott, Susan
Subject:	RE: diverseworks fax

I think this was intended for the other Susan Scott.

Thanks

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	LaGesse, Denise
Sent:	Thursday, May 10, 2001 2:06 PM
To:	Scott, Susan M.
Subject:	diverseworks fax

You received a fax up here from Sara Kellner at Diverseworks.  It's at my desk.  Please let them know your new fax number.  Thanks.

Denise LaGesse
Legal Department
P.O. Box 1188 (77251-1188)
1400 Smith Street, Room EB4784
Houston, Texas 77002
ph. 713-853-6704
fax 713-853-5425
Denise.LaGesse@Enron.com