I think you said you have this covered, but just in case, here is the
latest.  DF
---------------------- Forwarded by Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron on 08/03/2000
08:34 AM ---------------------------

Shelley Corman
08/02/2000 12:03 PM
To: David Badura/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Dannis Bellard/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Mike
Barry/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Larry Berger/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Lynn
Blair/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jack Boatman/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Michael
Bodnar/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Sean Bolks/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Joni
Bollinger/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Janet Bowers/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mike
Bryant/OTS/Enron@ENRON, John Buchanan/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Craig
Buehler/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Bob Burleson/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Rachel
Cady/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Allen Cohrs/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Bill
Cordes/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Robert Cullen/GCO/Enron@ENRON, Rick
Dietz/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Lindy Donoho/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Dari
Dornan/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, John Dushinske/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jeffery
Fawcett/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Sharon Farrell/FGT/Enron@ENRON, John
Fiscus/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Bill Fonda/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, Drew
Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Bill Fowler/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Steve
Gilbert/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, John Goodpasture/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Morgan
Gottsponer/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Glen Hass/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Robert
Hayes/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Rod Hayslett/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Bambi
Heckerman/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, Stephen Herber/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Staci
Holtzman/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Stanley Horton/Corp/Enron@Enron, Kevin
Hyatt/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Martha Janousek/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steven
January/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Beth Jensen/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, Tim
Johanson/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Dana Jones/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, rkilmer@enron.com,
Frazier King/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Steve Kirk/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Tim
Kissner/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Stephanie Korbelik/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Karen
Lagerstrom/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Laura Lantefield/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Lorraine
Lindberg/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, TK Lohman/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Michelle
Lokay/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Teb Lokey/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Phil
Lowry/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Bill Mangels/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Miriam
Martinez/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Penny McCarran/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Dorothy
McCoppin/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Mike McGowan/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Vernon
Mercaldo/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Rockford Meyer/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Kent
Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Paul
Miller/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, Jan Moore/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Michael
Moran/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Sheila Nacey/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Michel
Nelson/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Ray Neppl/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, Dave
Neubauer/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Sue M Neville/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jeff
Nielsen/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Tom Parker/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Larry
Pavlou/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Maria Pavlou/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Eileen
Peebles/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Loren Penkava/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Tony
Perry/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Keith Petersen/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, jplace@enron.com,
Don Powell/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Ken Powers/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Dan
Pribble/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Tony Pryor/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, David
Rosenberg/FGT/Enron@ENRON, James Saunders/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Dave
Schafer/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Gaye Lynn Schaffart/NPNG/Enron@Enron, Darrell
Schoolcraft/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Tracy Schwartzkopf/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Donna
Scott/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Chris
Sebesta/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Frank Semin/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Neal
Shaw/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Richard Shepherd/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, Gary
Spraggins/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Michael G Stage/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Ray
Stelly/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, LD Stephens/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Bob
Stevens/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Christine Stokes/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Rockey
Storie/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Larry Swett/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kay
Threet/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Linda Trevino/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Denis
Tu/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Mike Ullom/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Lisa
Valley/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Stephen Veatch/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Kimberly
Watson/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steve Weller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Chuck
Wilkinson/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jo Williams/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, John
Williams/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jim Wiltfong/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Raetta
Zadow/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: RSVP: August 25 - Introduction to the Electric Industry

By now I'm sure that you've heard about the upcoming electric industry class
that has been customized for GPG staff.   The purpose of the class is to
learn about electric utilities as our customers, learn about some of the
current regulatory and legislative debates and the impact on us, and to learn
about the economics of electric generation.

The class will be held on August 25 at the Downtown Houston Doubletree Hotel,
Granger Rooms A & B  from 8-5 PM.  Stan Horton will open the class with
remarks on why he believes GPG needs to learns about economics and trends in
the electric industry.  The class includes a full day of course work and a
working lunch will be served.   A  workbook is being prepared and will be
distributed to you a week prior to the class.

I hope you can attend.  Similar industry classes can cost upwards of $600 per
student.   Our customized class can accommodate up to 100 attendees.   Please
RSVP to Ruth Mann by email by August 8 if you plan to attend.  Once I get a
count of attendees from this list, I will open the class up to other GPG
attendees.


I made a few changes.  Dari
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Benningfield, Robert
Sent:	Tuesday, February 05, 2002 8:30 AM
To:	Dornan, Dari; Blair, Lynn; Dietz, Rick
Cc:	Berger, Larry; Bodnar, Michael; Buchanan, John; Johnson, Alice; Kowalke, Terry; Schoolcraft, Darrell; Spraggins, Gary; Zadow, Raetta; Benningfield, Robert; Forbish, Sherry; Greaney, Chris; Hibbard, Scott; Janzen, Randy; Linhart, Joe; McDaniel, Janet; Scurlock, Debra; Sturr, Kathy; Vaughan, Cara; Woodson, Harry
Subject:	Contract 104307 Transfer Agreement (Revised 2/5/2002)
Importance:	High

Please review and forward any changes by Monday February 11, 2002.

			 << File: TRANSFER 022002.doc >>

Thanks

Robert


Frank and I are staying at the Sheraton Belgravia which is about a 5 minute
walk to our office  -- it is small and quiet but nice rooms.  It is not on a
major street like Picadilly or Park Lane, but we like it.  The rate is about
o190 a night

We had to move out of our flat on Monday, so are staying there until we
leave.  Right now we are scheduled to fly out on Sat the 20th.

Also --- just a few notes on next week

I am free Monday night if you would like to have dinner.  I know Frank and
Maureen will be in Spain that night, they are back on Tuesday

Also my going away party that Fernley is throwing is on Wed night -- so
hopefully most people will drop by there.  It is just a pub thing near the
office, but hopefully you can make it!  I am sure there will be dinner or
something afterwards.

Talk to you soon

Beth

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  Sally Beck                           10/01/2001 22:58

To: Beth Apollo/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: London Hotel

Right now, I am booked at 47 Park for next week.  I would love to be closer
to the office, but I don't know if there is anything that makes sense.  Any
suggestions?  If not something close to the office, would you suggest another
spot besides 47 Park?

I am committed to working on my agenda for next week before I leave the
office tonight.  I will e:mail you tomorrow to see if we can schedule a time
to meet and hopefully a lunch or dinner, too.  --Sally


i put in 35000 for the expected volume for the sale to SDS/TUFCO. Sitara
276366


---------------------- Forwarded by Judy Hernandez/HOU/ECT on 04/20/2000
08:29 AM ---------------------------
Sandra R McNichols   04/20/2000 08:20 AM

To: Irene Flynn/HOU/ECT@ECT, Charlene Richmond/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kathleen
Speer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Berg/HOU/ECT@ECT, Judy Hernandez/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Pass This on

Thanks to several of you who have sent this my way.  I am SO BLESSED to be
surrounded by fine friends who are PROUD to proclaim we know and love the
Lord.
S.

Irene Flynn
04/17/2000 07:29 AM
To: Rhonda Robinson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Walker/HOU/ECT@ECT, Leon
Cernoch/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Mary Birmingham/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cassandra
Moses/HOU/ECT@ECT, Linda L Lawrence/HOU/EES@EES, Cathy L Harris/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Donna Consemiu/HOU/ECT@ECT, jmarcha@enron.com, Larry G Cash/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Sandra R McNichols/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ramirez@tisd.net
cc:
Subject: Do This

I'm not ashamed to do this!]
>> >
>> > If you aren't ashamed to do this, please follow
>> > the directions.  Jesus said, " if you are ashamed of
>> > me," I will be ashamed of you before my Father." Not
>> > ashamed Pass this on . . . only if you mean it.
>
>> > Yes, I do Love God. He is my source of existence and
>> > Savior. He keeps me functioning each and everyday.
>> > Without Him, I will be nothing.  Without him, I am
>> > nothing but with Him I can do all things through
>> > Christ that strengthens me.Phil 4:13 This is the
>> > simplest test . . . if  you  Love God, and are not
>> > ashamed of all the marvelous things he has done
>> > for you. Send this to ten people and the person who
>> > sent it to you!
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>


Kim, this link is available to all Enron employees.  If you think anyone
needs it just forward it on.

	Kim S Theriot
	03/07/2001 03:25 PM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Financial Trading Agreements Database Link

Jaime Williams and Agustin Perez in the Monterrey Mexico office expressed an
interest in this database so that they could track the progress of the ISDA
Master agreements for their counterparties.  Let me know...

Kim Theriot

From: Tana Jones on 03/07/2001 01:05 PM
To: Melissa Ann Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kim S Theriot/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rhonda L
Denton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jefferson D Sorenson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Larry Joe
Hunter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin Meredith/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Bruce
Mills/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Derek Bailey/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jean Bell/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Diane Anderson/NA/Enron@Enron, Souad Mahmassani/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Andrea R
Guillen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheetal Patel/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jarrod Cyprow/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Scott Tackett/Corp/Enron@Enron, Gordon Heaney/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Pamela
Sonnier/HOU/ECT@ECT, David P Dupre/HOU/ECT@ECT, Laurel Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Brent Hendry/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Sara
Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan Flynn/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan Bailey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael
Neves/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Financial Trading Agreements Database Link

Attached is the link that will allow you access to referenced database.
Please note, that we have just upgraded the database to add the ISDA
definitions, branch offices approved for trading, and market disruption
provisions.  This information should be inputted for the new master swap
agreements on a going forward basis, but we still need to go back and
repopulate the data for the existing master swap agreements.

Also, FYI, the "See" drop down is our nickname for the name changes and
mergers reference.  If an item is filled in for that entity it should show
you any prior or new names for the counterparty.

If there is anyone else who would like the link, please let me know and I
will forward it to them.

We hope you find the information provided in this database helpful.

Link -->


Chris,

Here is our status as of yesterday and answers to Richard's comments:

Primary issue:  4 to 5 second latency between Enron Stack/EnronOnline TEST changes to TrueQuote browser update. Updates from the Enron Stack to the True Quote interface bridge are instantaneous.

Other issues:
1.  Products hit/lifted on Truequote do not show price/volume updates from EnronOnline after transaction is complete on EnronOnline.
2.  Multiple product activation results in a "stepped" display of products on Truequote browser as opposed to all at once on EnronOnline.
3.  EnronOnline sends a bundle of information (e.g. products activated, prices changed, etc.) to the Truequote server.  Truequote server takes longer to process the incoming data than the EnronOnline server will stay connected.  Truequote has possibly resolved this issue by sending an immediate response for all incoming data in order to prevent the EnronOnline server from cutting the connection.

Oracle error:	Kevin Meredith  forwarded the email containing the text for the Oracle error to Kenneth Lim at 7:21AM.  Kenneth responded with an answer as to why we were receiving the error for transaction attempts by 7:36AM.  I informed Stewart Clark as to the status of the issue surrounding the Oracle error in our first conversation at approximately 9:00AM.  Kenneth's response: Approximately 6:20pm Wed night, there was an update to the TEST database which caused this error, we resolved this error along with our internal EnronOnlineTEST site with the resynching of our servers.

Price Update on any transaction attempt: This has always been the case with EnronOnline to ensure the correct price is showing

Chris please call me on my cell 713 825-6372

"Chris Edmonds" <chris.edmonds@truequote.com> on 03/15/2001 11:00:44 AM
To:	<bob.shults@enron.com>
cc:	"Stewart Clark \(E-mail\)" <stew@enform.com>, "Richard Toubia \(E-mail\)" <richard.toubia@truequote.com>, "Dennis Crum \(E-mail\)" <dennis.crum@truequote.com>
Subject:	FW: TQ-EnronOnline test Status

Bob:

Here is my latest update from my team.  How does it compare to your current
status?  In a conversation this morning with Stew, he brought up an
interesting point regarding the proposed performance of the connection.
Since we are using the public internet VPN tunnel, we are encrypting the
data to /from EOL during this test.  The encryption process is overhead on
the transfer between the systems.  When we begin using the dedicated T1s,
the plan is not to use the encryption between the sites.  This will
eliminate the associated overhead and increase performance.

I will also call you to follow-up.

Best regards,
Chris

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Toubia, Richard [mailto:Richard.Toubia@truequote.com]
Sent:	Thursday, March 15, 2001 11:10 AM
To:	Edmonds, Chris; Crum, Dennis
Cc:	Clark, Stewart D.; Paxton, Chris; O'Neill, Maria
Subject:	TQ-EOL test Status

Per your request, here are the testing status and issues:

Attempting Transactions:  EOL is sending an ORACLE Error which is failing
any transaction attempt.  A Bridge Server error is suspected.  A copy of the
Error was emailed to Kevin Meredith and Jason Althaus yesterday.  No
response yet.
EOL is sending a price update for any transaction attempt, Filled or Killed.
This was not expected by our team. (I think the stack manager is set up to
automatically regenerate a price, a different price if a transaction takes
place or same price if transaction is failed)
The price update triggers our Deal Execution Engine which attempts another
transaction, and we have a loop.
Performance issues:  We are looking into improving performance on our side
(such as better Data Base sweeping and STOR procedures).  In addition, EOL
is testing their speed on a LAN, we are testing over the internet with a
moderate-performance Server.
In addition, the first two issues have to be resolved before appropriate
performance evaluation can be meaningful.
During testing we came across some issues:
Bad TRP for BOM + 1 in Gas.  This was fixed
EOL tried sending wrong Prices, wrong volumes or wrong products to test how
our system will handle them.  These wrong products/ prices/volumes were
disregarded and not posted at all (which is what we are looking for)
Enform team are writing some code and changing other to accommodate some of
the issues that transpired during testing.

Regards,

Richard


Could someone please follow up on the status of this CP.  Thanks.  Sara


Please see the attached Management Report for June 23, 2000:

Total  Today Year To Date Life To Date

Number of Transactions  1,823 163,332 168,333
Gross Notional Value $  868,748,256 76,769,069,217 77,983,755,790

Revenue from Physical flows to date ($)  4,559,544,125 4,655,295,617

New Counterparties transacting today  1
Counterparties having transacted to date  373

Also attached is the Public Domain Report, containing information which is
intended for use in presentations or reports which will be seen by
individuals outside Enron:

Total Life to Date Transactions   > 167,000, which is > 52 % of Enron,s
current transactions for the month
Average Daily Transactions    > 2,000
Life to Date Notional Value of Transactions > $77 billion
Average Daily Notional Value    = Approximately $1 billion, which is 45% of
Enron,s Notional Volume
Number of Products Offered Each Day  = Approximately 820


Attached is a copy of a letter which we are sending to our Corporate, Enron
North America Corp., Enron Energy Services Operations, Inc., Enron Broadband
Services, Inc., Enron Net Works, LLC, Enron Engineering and Construction
Company, EGEP Services, Inc., Enron Transportation Services Company, Enron
Property Services Company, and Portland General Electric Company vendors as
an additional step toward implementing our commitment to conduct our business
affairs in accordance with the highest ethical standards.

We are sending you a copy of this letter so that you will be aware that your
vendors will be receiving this letter and so that you will be reminded that
Enron does enlist the cooperation of its vendors in adhering to its Business
Ethics Policy.

We appreciate your efforts in contributing to an Enron work environment of
which we can all be proud.

SAMPLE

November ____, 2000

OFFICE OF THE CHAIRMAN
rHeadquarter_Name_
rAddress_
rCity_ rState_  rZip_

Dear Sir or Madam :

 Enron Corp. (&Enron8) believes in conducting its business affairs in
accordance with the highest ethical standards.  Accordingly, employees of
Enron and its subsidiaries are required to comply with Enron's Business
Ethics Policy which requires an employee to conduct himself/herself in a
manner which is not detrimental to the best interests of Enron and which does
not bring to the employee financial gain separately derived as a direct
consequence of his/her employment with Enron.  Further, Enron's Business
Ethics Policy states that no lavish entertainment or gifts are to be given or
received by Enron employees for special position, price, or privilege.

 Not only is it incumbent upon our employees to follow this policy, but your
cooperation in respecting these standards is also critical.  Enron expects
each of its vendors and contractors to maintain adequate records that
document its work relationship with Enron.  Enron's auditing department will
routinely conduct business ethics compliance audits of certain vendors and
contractors with whom Enron does business.  Your recognition of our ethical
standards allows Enron employees to work with you via arm's length
transactions and avoids potentially embarrassing and unethical situations.
If you ever become aware of variances from our policy, please advise:

James V. Derrick, Jr.
Executive Vice President
and General   Counsel
(713) 853-5550	or report
	anonymously
	to:	Enron Compliance Officer
		CONFIDENTIAL
		Conduct of Business Affairs
		PO Box 1188
		Houston, Texas   77251-1188
		or
		the anonymous telephone line:
		(713) 853-7294
		or
		the anonymous e-mail address:
		ochairm@enron.com

 Your business relationship is important to us, and we look forward to
maintaining that relationship with you.

         Very truly yours,


On June 15th we will publish Low risk
PRECISION BUY/SELL POINTS on the 10 stocks
that comprise the XAU index.

For once, get into a Bull Market early.

SPECIAL INTRODUCTORY OFFER

Subscribe to the June issue for only $19, a 35% saving!

Offer expires June 15

Future issues only $29

Call 1-800-776-7966 to subscribe today.

The timing is right to start thinking GOLD

Special combo offers on www.feargreed.com
PBSP
1-800-776-7966

Transmissions  by the sender of this email may be stopped at no cost to you by
sending a reply to this from the E-mail address you received subject: Remove.
Please keep in mind it may take up to 48 hours to be removed. Thank you for your
patience.

**If you are receiving this message after you requested to be removed from our
mailing list, please send an 2nd request to pbsp@feargreed.com  subject : 2nd
request


Lisa J. Mellencamp
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith St.
Houston, TX  77002
Tel:  (713) 853-7986
Fax: (713) 646-3393
E-mail:  Lisa.Mellencamp@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Lisa Mellencamp/HOU/ECT on 11/29/2000 08:59 AM -----

	Brad Alford
	11/28/2000 06:06 PM

		 To: W David Duran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joseph Deffner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brian
Kerrigan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Charles Ward/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Lisa
Mellencamp/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: David Leboe/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chip Schneider/NA/Enron@Enron, Lewis
Worthy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christopher Coffman/Corp/Enron@Enron, Kevin
Liss/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Shirley A Hudler/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephen H
Douglas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Eickenroht/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Todd
Busby/NA/Enron@Enron, John Griffith/Corp/Enron@Enron, William S
Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Angela Davis/NA/Enron@Enron, bkalford@swbell.net,
mattcook@velaw.com, dstone@velaw.com, mspradling@velaw.com
		 Subject: 11-28-00 EPG/ECP Transaction Update

We are approaching the final countdown as to signing our definitive agreement
with El Paso regarding the sale of JEDI II's 51% interest in East Coast Power
and ENA's $157.9mm of ECP Subordinated Notes.

The transaction has continued to develop along the lines of my last update of
11-21-00.  The terms and economics remain essentially as outlined on
11-21-00.  In summary, the primary form of consideration will be a
derivative-like commodity agreement or a 'contract for differences'.  This
contract will be exchanged in full for the SubNotes and the majority of our
equity interest.  The JEDI II equity interest will also receive a residual
contingent interest which will become payable in the event of a PPA
restructuring at the Linden facility.  We are calling the derivative a swap
but it is more like a receivable.  An El Paso affiliate (guaranteed by El
Paso as parent) will notionally be paying NYMEX plus approx $0.52
(escalating) over seven years on a notional volume of 300,000 MMBtu/d and
receiving NYMEX.  With netting the contract is simply a series of fixed
quarterly payments over seven years.  No offset rights and no limitations on
the guarantee - fully a stand alone agreement.

We are optimistic that we may be able to sign documents as early as Thursday
night.  This agreement can be terminated at our option in the event that we
do not receive the necessary internal approvals.  There are only two
significant external approvals required, a NJ Environmental
'non-applicability' determination and ECP credit ratings reaffirmation.
Accordingly we expect at this time to receive the necessary internal and
external approvals and close by year end.  We expect that a public
announcement would be appropriate at the time both parties have received all
necessary internal approvals.

The portion of the commodity contract being exchanged for the SubNotes is
expected to be offered to Condor to monetize this portion of the contract at
year end.  Subsequent to Condor's acquisition of its contract, both JEDI II's
contract and the Condor contract are expected to be monetized in a QSPE
vehicle later in the first quarter.

Please call or email with any questions you may have.  Thanks for your
assistance in these matters.


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 04/10/2001
03:23 PM ---------------------------

VKaminski@aol.com on 04/08/2001 11:01:33 PM
To: vkamins@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Fwd: estimating tail of distribution and additional ri

Return-Path: <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>
Received: from  rly-ye04.mx.aol.com (rly-ye04.mail.aol.com [172.18.151.201])
by air-ye04.mail.aol.com (v77_r1.37) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 Apr 2001 18:55:49
-0500
Received: from  postmaster.enron.com (outbound5.enron.com [192.152.140.9]) by
rly-ye04.mx.aol.com (v77_r1.36) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 Apr 2001 18:55:04 2000
Received: from mailman.enron.com (mailman.enron.com [192.168.189.66]) by
postmaster.enron.com (8.8.8/8.8.8/postmaster-1.00) with ESMTP id WAA09923 for
<vkaminski@aol.com>; Fri, 6 Apr 2001 22:55:03 GMT
From: Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com
Received: from nahou-msmsw01px.corp.enron.com (nahou-msmsw01px.corp.enron.com
[172.28.10.37]) by mailman.enron.com (8.10.1/8.10.1/corp-1.05) with ESMTP id
f36Mt3L12194 for <vkaminski@aol.com>; Fri, 6 Apr 2001 17:55:03 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from ene-mta01.enron.com (unverified) by
nahou-msmsw01px.corp.enron.com (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.1.5) with ESMTP
id <Tac1c0a2512652c124002f@nahou-msmsw01px.corp.enron.com> for
<vkaminski@aol.com>; Fri, 6 Apr 2001 17:54:40 -0500
Subject: Re: estimating tail of distribution and additional risk measures
To: vkaminski@aol.com
Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2001 17:55:06 -0500
Message-ID: <OFC48E66E3.746E67D7-ON86256A26.007DDD9B@enron.com>
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on ENE-MTA01/Enron(Release 5.0.6 |December
14, 2000) at 04/06/2001 05:51:08 PM
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: multipart/mixed ;
Boundary="0__=86256A26007DDD9B8f9e8a93df938690918c86256A26007DDD9B"
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version)

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 04/06/2001
05:56 PM ---------------------------

Tanya Tamarchenko
03/21/2001 09:58 AM

To:   Naveen Andrews/Corp/Enron
cc:   Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Port/Market Risk/Corp/Enron
Subject:  Re: estimating tail of distribution and additional risk measures
      (Document link: Vince J Kaminski)

Naveen,
the "analytical VAR" approach is working for Equity portfolio.
It gives us the tool to examine the tails' behavior for this portfolio and
calculate "Expected Tail Loss".
The same should be done for commodities portfolio as well.

Meanwhile, as we discussed, we can give some rough estimates of the losses
corresponding to percentiles other than 5th.

Look at the figure below. You can see VAR numbers for 5%, 1%, 0.5% and 0.1%
calculated with
1) simulations (100 thousand simulations);
2) analytical VAR (gamma-delta positions representation)

     1) and 2) are very close because there are not many options in Equity
portfolio.

3) simulations (1000 simulations) to calculate 5% VAR. Then in order to
approximately estimate VAR for 1%, 0.5% and 0.1%
I scaled 5% VAR with factors corresponding to normal distribution (for
example: Norminv(0.001,0,1)/Norminv(0.05,0,1) for 0.1%).
The result of such extrapolation in this case is quite good (just 5%
different from the correct number).
We probably can use such rough estimates of tail for commodities portfolio
until we have proper methods implemented.

(Embedded image moved to file: pic21543.pcx)

Tanya Tamarchenko
02/28/2001 01:17 PM

To:   Wenyao Jia/HOU/ECT, Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:   Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject:  Re: "analytical" var implementation in RisktRAC  (Document link:
      Tanya Tamarchenko)

Debbie,
I am forwarding to you a 2 page document describing implementation of
"analytical" VAR in RisktRAC.

Here is why this effort is very important:
1. We need to calculate VAR for other percentile but 5 (1% or even 0.2% as
mentioned by Rick Buy)
and our simulation model can not handle required number of simulations;
2. We need to present additional risk measures (such as Mean Tail Loss) to
the Board.

The analytical approach is implemented in a spreadsheet and fully tested
already so there will be no problems
with the algorithm itself.

We need to get together and discuss IT implementation.

What do you think?

Tanya

(See attached file: Analytical_VAR.doc)

 - pic21543.pcx
 - Analytical_VAR.doc


Please activate long term phys index products in draft.  They are one year
index products 02-04.

Thanks,
Mike
x37031


Does anyone know this guy and should we interview him?
---------------------- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 01/25/2000
11:10 AM ---------------------------

Julia Murray
01/21/2000 06:10 PM
To: Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Bruce Stevenson - Resume

Please let me know what you think.   Julia
---------------------- Forwarded by Julia Murray/HOU/ECT on 01/21/2000 06:10
PM ---------------------------

Ann Ballard@ENRON
01/21/2000 10:55 AM
To: Julia Murray/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Bruce Stevenson - Resume

Here's a copy of Bruce's resume.  If you see that he has some skills that ENA
legal would be interested in, I would be happy to introduce him to you.
---------------------- Forwarded by Ann Ballard/Corp/Enron on 01/21/2000
10:54 AM ---------------------------

"Bruce Stevenson" <bruce_stevenson@transcanada.com> on 01/21/2000 10:24:26 AM
To: Ann Ballard/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Bruce Stevenson - Resume

Ann:
I've attached my resume as requested.  Many thanks for all your help!
Bruce

 - Resume.Enron.doc


Team,  thought you would find this somewhat interesting
and?explanatory?of?California's  near? term panic . Our  California
Commission? is predisposed to do almost anything to stem the  tide of higher
energy prices. Their latest manifestation of complete melt-down  comes in the
form of attempting to modify electric QF payments by abandoning the  current
gas index methodology utilized by all three utilities. Essentially, the
proposed decision would?immediately (effective 12/1) abandon the old
California border gas indexes in favor of adopting a "proxy gas price".?
This new proxy gas price would apply to all three utilities, PG&E, SCE and
SDG&E. On a temporary basis, the gas index used for eventual electric QF
payments will be an gas index consisting of? ( i ) 10 % of the simple
average of three border indices at Topock ( Btu Daily, NGI, Natural Gas
Week)  and? (ii ) 90% of the SoCal Gas Core Wacog published monthly in
Schedule  G-CS or (in the case of PG&E) 90 % of their core published WACOG .?
The  resultant reduction in electric QF payments is several hundreds of
Millions of  dollars just for? December alone.
?
So  what if anything does this mean to TW ?? Clearly, TW's short term desk
maybe be affected. If Cal border numbers run 14 - 20 dollars and power
payments  are based upon PG&E Wacog of $7.50 gas demand for electric
generation  will? moderate. Next, the heat level on the cause of why basin to
border  price spreads are over $10 is not longer just a Commission vs.. EPNG
issue. The  entire California QF population becomes a huge stakeholder. The
never ending  search for a "bad Guy" escalates. TW needs to be careful?from
becoming  painted with a broad brush. TW is not one of the Southwest bad
Guys. TW's pipe  is not oversold, is point to point firm, widely held, useful
to California's  utilities etc.
?
If any  of this is useful and you want to further explore to potential
ramifications,  please call .? Mark, IGS
?
-----Original Message-----
From: Gwen Soong  [mailto:igsinc@ix.netcom.com]
Sent: Monday, December 04, 2000 8:23  AM
To: Mark Baldwin
Subject: FW: R.99-11-022 - ALJ Cooke's  Draft Decision, Ruling, All-Party
Notice - Section 390

?
-----Original Message-----
From: Gallardo, Teresita C.  [mailto:tcg@cpuc.ca.gov]
Sent: Friday, December 01, 2000 2:58  PM
To: 'jweisgall@aol.com'; 'rcsstl@cdmnet.com'; 'dnorris@sppc.com';
'mcmannes@aol.com'; 'lgurick@calpx.com'; 'woodrujb@sce.com';
'gbarnes@sempra.com'; 'bfinkelstein@turn.org'; Ramos, Julio J.;
'dgrueneich@gralegal.com'; 'ktilton@gralegal.com'; 'alr4@pge.com';
'bcragg@gmssr.com'; 'eke@aelaw.com'; 'jsqueri@gmssr.com';
'bloomje@la.whitecase.com'; 'jkarp@whitecase.com'; 'lys@aelaw.com';
'edoneill@dwt.com'; 'lindseyhowdowning@dwt.com'; 'ssmyers@hooked.net';
'tomb@crossborderenergy.com'; 'pmcdonne@wenet.net'; 'jcrossen@apx.com';
'tridam@mlode.com'; 'plenv01@northcoast.com'; 'dkk@eslawfirm.com';
'bellery@spi-ind.com'; 'mpa@aelaw.com'; 'dws@keywaycorp.com';
'vwatkins@pira.com'; 'crochlin@socalgas.com'; 'ewheless@lascd.org';
'douglass@arterhadden.com'; 'robinsc@sce.com'; 'jleslie@luce.com';
'edward.c.ryan@monsanto.com'; 'robert.turner@engageenergy.com';
'ewills@globalfrontiers.com'; 'daipm@daioildale.com'; 'rboyd@enron.com';
'ed@apx.com'; 'rschmidt@bartlewells.com'; 'aod@newsdata.com';
'maclean@sf.whitecase.com'; 'alexm@calpine.com'; 'billw@calpine.com';
'rjszymanski@powerworksinc.com'; 'steve.huhman@southernenergy.com';
'rbw@mrwassoc.com'; 'difellman@energy-law-group.com'; 'rmccann@cal.net';
'blaising@braunlegal.com'; 'abb@eslawfirm.com'; 'etiedemann@kmtg.com';
'steve_ponder@fpl.com'; 'dbranchcomb@hesinet.com'; Stevens, Maria E.; Quan,
Edwin; Wilson, Gregory A.; Loewen, James; Cooke, Michelle; Sabino, Pearlie
Z.;  'jhoffsis@energy.state.ca.us'; 'jmathis@edisonmission.com';
'fspasaro@socalgas.com'; 'napedersen@jonesday.com'; 'cread@omm.com';
'dfollett@sempra.com'; 'bjeider@earthlink.net'; 'millerja@sce.com';
'jleslie@luce.com'; 'mshames@ucan.org'; 'mtierney@sdge.com';
'dhmaynor@worldnet.att.net'; 'furutanj@efawest.navfac.navy.mil';
'mflorio@turn.org'; Scarff, James E.; 'imoosen@gralegal.com';
'phanschen@mofo.com'; 'rschmidt@bartlewells.com'; 'aod@newsdata.com';
'david@mbvlaw.com'; 'jsqueri@gmssr.com'; 'bloomje@la.whitecase.com';
'chilen@llgm.com'; 'edwardoneill@dwt.com'; 'lindseyhowdowning@dwt.com';
'ssmyers@hooked.net'; 'rumla@earthlink.net'; 'igsinc@ix.netcom.com';
'gtbl@dynegy.com'; 'wbooth@booth-law.com'; 'rbw@mrwassoc.com';
'difellman@energy-law-group.com'; 'askaff@energy-law-group.com';
'tomb@crossborderenergy.com'; 'brbarkovich@earthlink.net';
'rmccann@cal.net';  'cmkehrein@ems-ca.com'; 'bob@sierracc.com';
'lwhouse@el-dorado.ca.us';  'bradylaw@pacbell.net'; 'abb@eslawfirm.com';
'abb@eslawfirm.com';  'pstohr@dbsr.com'; 'njohnson@ciwmb.ca.gov';
'dbranchcomb@hesinet.com';  'scohn@smud.org'; 'malcantar@aandellp.com';
'wgibson@nwppc.org';  'dws@keywaycorp.com'; 'mbrubaker@consultbai.com';
'rboyd@enron.com';  'foothill@lmi.net'; 'fosterbc@sce.com'; 'frl3@pge.com';
'wbyrne@forenergy.com.';  'jmeith@minasianlaw.com'; Stevens, Maria E.;
Minkin, Angela K.; Schumacher,  Brian D.; Danforth, Christopher; Lafrenz,
Donald J.; Ghazzagh, Farzad; Walker,  Glen; Econome, Janet A.; Ajello, Julian
E.; Halligan, Julie; Tan, Lee-Whei;  Ziering, Mark; Cooke, Michelle;
Kinosian, Robert; Sarvate, Sarita; Linsey,  Steve; Thompson, Thomas W.;
Meyer, William;  'kgriffin@energy.state.ca.us'
Cc: Gallardo, Teresita  C.
Subject: R.99-11-022 - ALJ Cooke's Draft Decision, Ruling,  All-Party Notice
- Section 390

<<CPUC01-#84763-v1-I8907004_R9911022_Cooke_Ruling.DOC>>
<<CPUC01-#84823-v1-R9911022_Cooke__All-Party_Notice.DOC>>
<<CPUC01-#84805-v1-R9911022_Cooke_Comment_Dec_.DOC>>

 - CPUC01-#84763-v1-I8907004_R9911022_Cooke_Ruling.DOC
 - CPUC01-#84823-v1-R9911022_Cooke__All-Party_Notice.DOC
 - CPUC01-#84805-v1-R9911022_Cooke_Comment_Dec_.DOC


Read about New York's electricity deregulation in eBiz.

Also in this issue:
Enron's difference of opinion with the Bush Administration
A California update
Trading ad time at Enron

It's all in the latest eBiz.  Go to home.enron.com, click Publications, then
click eBiz, and "eBiz March 16, 2001."


fyi, rick
---------------------- Forwarded by Rick Buy/HOU/ECT on 01/24/2001 04:11 PM
---------------------------
From: Rebecca Carter@ENRON on 01/24/2001 03:54 PM
Sent by: Kelly Johnson@ENRON
To: James M Bannantine/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Cliff
Baxter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sanjay Bhatnagar/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Rick Buy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard Causey/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Diomedes
Christodoulou/SA/Enron@Enron, David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT, James
Derrick/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Andrew S Fastow/HOU/ECT@ECT, peggy_fowler@pgn.com,
Mark Frevert/NA/Enron@Enron, Ben F Glisan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin Hannon/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, David
Haug/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Stanley Horton/Corp/Enron@Enron,
Larry L Izzo/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Steven J
Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Mark Koenig/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mike
McConnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rebecca McDonald/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Jeffrey McMahon/Enron@EnronXGate, Mark Metts/NA/Enron@Enron, Cindy
Olson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Karen S Owens@ees@EES, Ken Rice/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Jeffrey Sherrick/Corp/Enron@ENRON, John
Sherriff/LON/ECT@ECT, Jeff Skilling/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Greg
Whalley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Thomas E White/HOU/EES@EES, Philippe A Bibi/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Raymond Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael R Brown/LON/ECT@ECT, Wade
Cline/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, James A
Hughes/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron@Enron,
Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeremy Blachman/HOU/EES@EES, Harold G
Buchanan/HOU/EES@EES, Dan Leff/HOU/EES@EES, Mark S Muller/HOU/EES@EES,
Matthew Scrimshaw/LON/ECT@ECT, Marty Sunde/HOU/EES@EES, David Cox/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Steve Elliott/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Jim Fallon/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Rod
Hayslett/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Danny McCarty/ET&S/Enron@Enron
cc: Rex Rogers/Corp/Enron@Enron, Terry West/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jim
Armogida/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mary Joyce/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Pam
Butler/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Stephanie McGinnis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sharon E
Sullo/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brenda Castillo/NA/Enron@Enron, Marcia
Manarin/SA/Enron@Enron, Susan Skarness/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacy
Guidroz/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Beena
Pradhan/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Karen K Heathman/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Sharron Westbrook/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Molly Bobrow/NA/Enron@Enron, Kay
Chapman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephanie Harris/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Bridget
Maronge/HOU/ECT@ECT, mary_trosper@pgn.com, Nicki Daw/NA/Enron@Enron, Carol
Ann Brown/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Elaine
Rodriguez/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Cindy Stark/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Mary E Garza/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@Enron_Development, Maureen
McVicker/NA/Enron@Enron, Joannie Williamson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Cathy
Phillips/HOU/ECT@ECT, Loretta Brelsford/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Sue Ford/Enron@EnronXGate, Dolores Fisher/NA/Enron@Enron, Kathy
McMahon/NA/Enron@Enron, Karen Owens/HOU/EES@EES, Dorothy Dalton/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Christina Grow/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Lauren
Urquhart/LON/ECT@ECT, Sherri Sera/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Liz M Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Judy G Smith/HOU/EES@EES, Inez Dauterive/HOU/ECT@ECT, Veronica
Valdez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Teresa Wright/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Peggy
McCurley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marsha Schiller/HOU/ECT@ECT, Fiona Stewart/LON/ECT@ECT,
Jana L Paxton/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Mrudula
Gadade/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Connie
Blackwood/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Tammie Schoppe/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Kimberly Hillis/HOU/ECT@ect, Jennifer Burns/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sharon
Dick/HOU/EES@EES, Beverly Aden/HOU/EES@EES, Kathy Dodgen/HOU/EES@EES, Binky
Davidson/HOU/EES@EES, Kerry Ferrari/LON/ECT@ECT, Carol Moffett/HOU/EES@EES,
Jennifer T Adams/HOU/EES@EES, Leah Rijo/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Lucy Marshall/Enron Communications@Enron Communications,
Kathy Campos/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Julie Armstrong/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Taria
Reed/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: ENE Committee and Board Meeting Schedule - 2001


---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 03/21/2000 11:34
AM ---------------------------

Chris Germany
03/20/2000 12:19 PM
To: Colleen Sullivan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joan Veselack/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mary
Theresa Franklin/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Local Production from John Singer

I had this filed in the wrong spot.  These are John's citygate production
deals.

---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 03/20/2000 12:17
PM ---------------------------

	From:  John M Singer                           02/24/2000 07:21 PM

To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: #2


Attached is the Top North America Legal Risks report.  Mark Haedicke would
like you to update this report.  Many thanks.

Janette Elbertson
Enron Wholesale Services
Legal Department - EB3326
Telephone:  (713) 853-7906
Fax:  (713) 646-2600
janette.elbertson@enron.com


Deborah asked me to find swap forms that you left behind - she said these forms were prepared for vicki sharp.  let me know.


Hi

I've attached a couple of files summarizing our progress and current status on modeling the bid-ask spread.  The first summarizes characterization of the EOL Crude data and the second describes a bid-ask spread model based on options theory developed by Zimin (The figure from the paper is included separately).  I am now setting up an Excel spreadsheet to test this model with the EOL data.

Let me know when you would like to meet to review this.

Thanks, Bob Lee

<Embedded >


/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/

Wall of Champs Is Up!   If you've made your playoffs or won your league, let
the world know about it.   We've got our Wall of Champs up and running and
waiting for you.  Check it out here  http://footballguys.com/wall2001.cfm
You can add your team here http://footballguys.com/addwall.cfm   There's not
much better than flaunting your success in front of your league members...

Enjoy.

/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/

***Correction - In the rushing Matchups I just sent, I mentioned Stacey Mack
playing the Raiders last week.   Obviously, I meant the Vikings as I wrote
about in the week 15 matchups.

Thanks.

/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/
Hi Folks,

Here's how I see the Passing Game Matchups this week.

PLEASE NOTE:   See the cheatsheets online at www.footballguys.com  for
exactly where I rank players and to determine who to start.   I always
receive emails asking me how I can have a guy ranked highly on the
cheatsheet but listed under a matchup that favors the Defense.   Just
because one matchup may be more favorable than another, that doesn't
necessarily mean I'd start the player with the best matchup.   Jeff Garcia
may have a horrible matchup one week but unless you're sitting on Kurt
Warner or Brett Favre, Garcia's your guy no matter who he's lining up
against.   The matchup info is meant to be just one more tool in your box
when it comes to deciding between players.

Note:  I've used the player stats sorted by performance over the last four
weeks extensively in developing these write-ups. Stats are provided by Mike
Hall's excellent FLM League Management Software.  http://www.fflm.com/ for
more info.   The points scored by position data is from ESPN.com.
Let's get to it.

Joe

/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/

Passing Game Matchups to Avoid and Exploit

/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/

Locks:  These games feature Defenses that have struggled lately.

Arizona Passing Game vs Carolina Defense

Jake Plummer came up small last week with just 144 yards against a hot
Dallas pass Defense.   Surprisingly, David Boston was a non factor with just
26 yards.   Although he still had a ton of balls thrown his way so there's
nothing to worry about.   Carolina ranks # 30 in Passing Yards Allowed Per
Game over the last four weeks.   For the year, they rank # 28 in Fantasy
Points Allowed to QBs and # 22 in Fantasy Points Allowed to WRs.

Cleveland Passing Game vs Tennessee Defense

Tim Couch threw for 203 yards and a TD last week against Green Bay which was
the 12th best day among QBs last week ahead of guys like Manning, McNair and
Garcia.   Clearly, the matchup helped him out.   Kevin Johnson, as usual,
was his primary target although it was good to see RB Jamel White involved
in the passing game with lots of passes thrown his way.   The Titans have
been awful lately against the pass ranking # 29 in Passing Yards Allowed Per
Game over the last four weeks.   For the year, they rank # 30 in Fantasy
Points Allowed to QBs and # 31 in Fantasy Points Allowed to WRs.   Again,
some people have a hard time understanding what these matchups provide - I'm
not saying Couch will have a great game.   Check the cheatsheet rankings for
where we have him.   What I'm saying is that he has a great matchup here
against the Titans who've struggled against the pass all year.

Miami Passing Game vs Atlanta Defense

Jay Fiedler exploded for 320 yards and a TD last week.   Finally,
Footballguy Favorite Chris Chambers got a start and delivered big time with
124 yards on 7 receptions.   He did tweak an ankle but is expected to be ok
this week.   TE Jed Weaver also saw lots of passes thrown his way.   The
Falcons rank # 31 in Passing Yards Allowed Per Game over the last four
weeks.   For the year, they rank # 29 in Fantasy Points Allowed to QBs and #
30 in Fantasy Points Allowed to WRs.

New York Jets Passing Game vs Buffalo Defense

Vinny Testeverde refuses to fade away.   He rolled up 285 yards and 2 TDs
(with 2 Interceptions) against Indy Sunday.   Wayne Chrebet was the primary
WR with Laveranues Coles seeing less action.   TE Anthony Becht produced
another TD.   The Bills rank # 27 in Passing Yards Allowed Per Game over the
last four weeks.   For the year, they rank # 24 in Fantasy Points Allowed to
QBs and # 20 in Fantasy Points Allowed to WRs.

St. Louis Passing Game vs Indianapolis Defense

Kurt Warner had an "off" day for him with "just" 217 yards and 2 TDs.   Of
course, he's a must start every week.   The trouble with him is he spreads
the ball around so well, it's tough to predict which WR will see action but
I'd have a very hard time benching guys like Holt, Bruce or even Proehl.
Keep an eye on the thumb he tweaked but he's saying he's ok.   The Colts
rank # 28 in Passing Yards Allowed Per Game over the last four weeks.   For
the year, they rank # 27 in Fantasy Points Allowed to QBs and # 27 in
Fantasy Points Allowed to WRs.

/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/

Prime Matchups:  These games feature Defenses that haven't been strong
lately.

Chicago Passing Game vs Detroit Defense

Marty Booker catching 74 yards worth of passes isn't as remarkable until you
realize QB Jim Miller only threw for 98 yards.   I guess that makes Booker
the # 1 WR...   He's clearly the favored option.   This team is all about
Anthony Thomas and their defense though so I'm not too excited about any of
these guys outside of Booker even with the matchup.   The Lions rank # 22 in
Passing Yards Allowed Per Game over the last four weeks.   For the year,
they rank # 31 in Fantasy Points Allowed to QBs and # 29 in Fantasy Points
Allowed to WRs.

Green Bay Passing Game vs Minnesota Defense

Brett Favre made the most out of 139 yards throwing for 3 TDs last week.
He's too good to sit against anyone.   Antonio Freeman and Billy Schroeder
are solid options and Bubba Franks seems to have picked up where he was
earlier this year.   The Vikings rank # 17 in Passing Yards Allowed Per Game
over the last four weeks.   For the year, they rank # 21 in Fantasy Points
Allowed to QBs and # 24 in Fantasy Points Allowed to WRs.

Indianapolis Passing Game vs St. Louis Defense

Manning was back on track again with 228 yards, 1 TD and 0 Interceptions
last week.   The interceptions have hurt him this year but the fact is he's
still one of the leagues best QBs.   Marvin Harrison was incredible catching
nearly everything in his sight.   The Rams rank # 24 in Passing Yards
Allowed Per Game over the last four weeks.  Remember, Chris Weinke rolled
over them last week.   For the year, they rank # 15 in Fantasy Points
Allowed to QBs and # 8 in Fantasy Points Allowed to WRs.

Oakland Passing Game vs Denver Passing Game

It's funny when people get excited about Gannon throwing just 249 yards but
that's what's happening.   He's spoiled us.   I'm not worried about him as
along with Jerry Rice and Tim Brown, they're still one of the better passing
units in the game.   Charlie Garner is a nice target too.   This week,
they'll face a suddenly vulnerable Denver team that ranks # 23 in Passing
Yards Allowed Per Game over the last four weeks.   For the year, they rank #
9 in Fantasy Points Allowed to QBs and # 25 in Fantasy Points Allowed to
WRs.

Tampa Bay Passing Game vs Baltimore Defense

Brad Johnson put together a great game with 3 TDs and 0 Interceptions on 207
yards.   Keyshawn Johnson is of course the receiver of choice and outside of
him, I don't see many other viable FF options.   Johnson to Johnson is the
name of this passing game.   Baltimore ranks # 26 in Passing Yards Allowed
Per Game over the last four weeks.   For the year, they rank # 17 in Fantasy
Points Allowed to QBs and # 19 in Fantasy Points Allowed to WRs.

/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/

Even Matchups:  These games feature no real advantage either way

Carolina Passing Game vs Arizona Defense

Weinke's 312 yard day last week against the Rams was surprising as the Rams
were ranked as the # 9 passing defense over the last 4 weeks going into last
week.   Donald Hayes was ultra active and may need to be again this week as
Muhsin Muhammad is very iffy and TE Wesley Walls tweaked his knee.   The
Cardinals rank # 14 in Passing Yards Allowed Per Game over the last four
weeks.   For the year, they rank # 26 in Fantasy Points Allowed to QBs and #
26 in Fantasy Points Allowed to WRs.

Denver Passing Game vs Oakland Defense

Brian Griese should be back and ready to go.   Gus Frerotte is out for the
year so Jarius Jackson will be the # 2 guy.   Rod Smith is the only receiver
of note and he's a guy you can never count out.   The bye week helped and
he's reportedly feeling better than he has in a while.   Oakland has
struggled lately on defense ranking # 21 in Passing Yards Allowed Per Game
over the last four weeks.   For the year, they rank # 10 in Fantasy Points
Allowed to QBs and # 13 in Fantasy Points Allowed to WRs.

Jacksonville Passing Game vs Kansas City Defense

Brunell had a Brunell-like day last week with 217 yards and a TD.   Jimmy
Smith is a must start and Keenan McCardell deserves a hard look in just
about any league.   The Chiefs rank # 18 in Passing Yards Allowed Per Game
over the last four weeks.   For the year, they rank # 14 in Fantasy Points
Allowed to QBs and # 12 in Fantasy Points Allowed to WRs.

Kansas City Passing Game vs Jacksonville Defense

Trent Green put together a decent day with 203 yards, 1 TD and 2
Interceptions.   Snoop Minnis was the preferred WR while Derrick Alexander
did very little.   Tony Gonzalez was fairly involved although not as much as
his owners would like to see.   He's still a must start for TE leagues.
The Jaguars rank # 20 in Passing Yards Allowed Per Game over the last four
weeks.   For the year, they rank # 19 in Fantasy Points Allowed to QBs and #
6 in Fantasy Points Allowed to WRs.

Minnesota Passing Game vs Green Bay Defense

Stay tuned this week for whether Todd Bouman or Spergon Wynn gets the call.
The Vikings have imploded.   If Bouman starts, it's much better news for
Moss.   If Wynn starts, Cris Carter seemed to be the favored target.
Although it was pretty clear that they were forcing the ball to Carter
because it could've been his last game in Minnesota.   Honestly, it's tough
to sit Cris Carter or Randy Moss regardless of who is at QB.   WRs are
rarely a sure thing.   The Packers rank # 19 in Passing Yards Allowed Per
Game over the last four weeks.   For the year, they rank # 12 in Fantasy
Points Allowed to QBs and # 5 in Fantasy Points Allowed to WRs.

Philadelphia Passing Game vs New York Giants Defense

The Eagle passing game is all about McNabb to RB Duce Staley now.   Good for
Staley owners but not the ideal situation for McNabb.   James Thrash and
Freddie Mitchell saw most of the action at WR but they weren't too
effective.   Todd Pinkston is in the mix which makes it even tougher to pick
a WR.   The Giants may be without Jason Sehorn this week which would be big.
They rank # 6 in Passing Yards Allowed Per Game over the last four weeks.
For the year, they rank # 18 in Fantasy Points Allowed to QBs and # 28 in
Fantasy Points Allowed to WRs.

Pittsburgh Passing Game vs Cincinnati Defense

Kordell Stewart continues to prove his critics wrong as he rolled up 3 TDs
last week and 221 yards.   There's serious MVP talk about him and deservedly
so.   WRs Hines Ward and Plaxico Burress both deserve a look for most any
team.   Burress, in particular, is coming on lately.   The Bengals are
tougher than many realize against the pass lately.   They rank # 7 in
Passing Yards Allowed Per Game over the last four weeks.   For the year,
they rank # 16 in Fantasy Points Allowed to QBs and # 21 in Fantasy Points
Allowed to WRs.

San Diego Passing Game vs Seattle Defense

Doug Flutie was awful early, but made a great recovery to finish with 175
yards and 2 TDs with no Interceptions.   There's a lot of talk about letting
Drew Brees see action with the season basically over but one has to think we
would've seen him last week if that was the case.   Either way, Flutie's
probably not worthy of a start except for the larger leagues.   Of the WRs,
Curtis Conway was clearly the go to guy with TE Freddie Jones seeing action
as well.   The Seahawks rank # 9 in Passing Yards Allowed Per Game over the
last four weeks.   For the year, they rank # 23 in Fantasy Points Allowed to
QBs and # 17 in Fantasy Points Allowed to WRs.

Seattle Passing Game vs San Diego Defense

Matt Hasselbeck hasn't carried many FF Teams this season and I doubt it'll
start now.   He's still a below average player.   WRs Koren Robinson and
Darrell Jackson are the primary guys while Shaun Alexander will be involved
in the passing game as well.   The Chargers rank # 15 in Passing Yards
Allowed Per Game over the last four weeks.   For the year, they rank # 22 in
Fantasy Points Allowed to QBs and # 15 in Fantasy Points Allowed to WRs.

Washington Passing Game vs New Orleans Defense

Tony Banks threw for 236 yards last week in a tough game with Chicago.
Michael Westbrook and Rod Gardner both saw roughly equal numbers of passes
thrown their way.   He only caught a couple, but TE Zeron Felmister saw 6
passes thrown his way.   You could do a lot worse for a TE.   Plus, he's got
a cool name...   The Saints rank # 13 in Passing Yards Allowed Per Game over
the last four weeks.   For the year, they rank # 25 in Fantasy Points
Allowed to QBs and # 23 in Fantasy Points Allowed to WRs.

/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/

Downside Matchups:  These games feature a Defense that's been pretty strong
lately.

Buffalo Passing Game vs New York Jets Defense

Van Pelt put together a 208 yard / 1 TD passing game last week.   As usual,
Eric Moulds and Peerless Price were featured fairly evenly.   This week, the
Bills face a pretty tough Jets team that ranks # 11 in Passing Yards Allowed
Per Game over the last four weeks.   For the year, they rank # 1 in Fantasy
Points Allowed to QBs and # 4 in Fantasy Points Allowed to WRs.

Dallas Passing Game vs San Francisco Defense

I can't imagine you're in contention in week 16 with many of these guys on
the roster.   Quincy Carter's given me very little to make me think he'll do
much of anything.   Of course, for the gamblers, Rocket Ismail or Joey
Galloway can make something happen with just one throw, but they're definite
risks.   San Francisco is ranked # 8 in Passing Yards Allowed Per Game over
the last four weeks.   For the year, they rank # 13 in Fantasy Points
Allowed to QBs and # 18 in Fantasy Points Allowed to WRs.

Detroit Passing Game vs Chicago Defense

Rookie Mike McMahon gave a valiant effort but it's still very clear he's a
rookie QB.   Granted, he's got talent and potential but he's still very
green.   Johnnie Morton is the WR of choice but TE David Sloan actually saw
more balls thrown his way last week than any other Lion receiver.   That's
not unusual for a new QB to focus on the shorter routes of a TE and it could
continue.   The Bears rank # 12 in Passing Yards Allowed Per Game over the
last four weeks.  For the year, they rank # 8 in Fantasy Points Allowed to
QBs and # 2 in Fantasy Points Allowed to WRs.

New Orleans Passing Game vs Washington Defense

Few people expected Tampa Bay to start a track meet with New Orleans last
week but that's what happened.   Aaron Brooks had 3 TDs late as the Saints
tried to rally from a big deficit.   Stats are stats though and Brooks
owners will take them any way they can get them.   Joe Horn and Willie
Jackson saw tons of action.   With Cam Cleeland shockingly injured again,
Boo Williams is back as the # 1 TE so that's good news.   The Redskins rank
# 4 in Passing Yards Allowed Per Game over the last four weeks.   For the
year, they rank # 5 in Fantasy Points Allowed to QBs and # 11 in Fantasy
Points Allowed to WRs.

New York Giants Passing Game vs Philadelphia Defense

Kerry Collins quietly finished with nice numbers last week.   He threw for
338 yards and 1 TD.   Amani Toomer and Ike Hilliard saw lots of action with
Joe Jurevicius seeing plenty of balls thrown his way too.   The Eagles have
cooled lately where they rank # 16 in Passing Yards Allowed Per Game over
the last four weeks.   For the year, they rank # 2 in Fantasy Points Allowed
to QBs and # 1 in Fantasy Points Allowed to WRs.   Their blitzing style can
cause young QBs plenty of trouble but Collins' experience should help him.

Tennessee Passing Game vs Cleveland Defense

Steve McNair played a gutsy game last week at well less than 100%.   He
managed 178 yards, 1 TD and 2 Interceptions.   Derrick Mason is still the
primary guy and saw more looks than TE Frank Wycheck which is saying
something.   This week, they'll face a surprising Brown defense that ranks #
10 in Passing Yards Allowed Per Game over the last four weeks.   For the
year, they rank # 3 in Fantasy Points Allowed to QBs and # 14 in Fantasy
Points Allowed to WRs.

/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/

Defensive Slam Dunks:  These games feature a Defense that's been very strong
lately.

Atlanta Passing Game vs Miami Defense

Chris Chandler continued his up and down season with a monster game last
week throwing for 431 yards and 2 TDs against Buffalo.   Terance Mathis,
Tony Martin and Footballguy Favorite Brian Finneran all had great games.
As you know though, these guys are very inconsistent.   This week, they'll
face a Miami Defense that ranks # 1 in Passing Yards Allowed Per Game over
the last four weeks.   For the year, they rank # 6 in Fantasy Points Allowed
to QBs and # 10 in Fantasy Points Allowed to WRs.

Baltimore Passing Game vs Tampa Bay Defense

Elvis Grbac continues to at least not hurt the offense.   He threw for 181
yards last week with no TDs or Interceptions.   Qadry Ismail is the
preferred target at WR with Shannon Sharpe always threatening to make an
impact.   The Ravens face the Bucs who are hot right now ranking # 3 in
Passing Yards Allowed Per Game over the last four weeks.   For the year,
they rank # 11 in Fantasy Points Allowed to QBs and # 9 in Fantasy Points
Allowed to WRs.

Cincinnati Passing Game vs Pittsburgh Defense

You pretty much have to avoid all these guys.   Jon Kitna threw for 153
yards and 3 Interceptions.   His most newsworthy accomplishment was a
sideline shouting match with WR Chad Johnson.   Peter Warrick was benched
for fielding a punt on his own 3 yard line.   Warrick should start this
week.   They teased us early , but these are clearly still the Bengals.
Pittsburgh ranks # 5 in Passing Yards Allowed Per Game over the last four
weeks.   For the year, they rank # 7 in Fantasy Points Allowed to QBs and #
7 in Fantasy Points Allowed to WRs.

San Francisco Passing Game vs Dallas Defense

Garcia only had 136 yards and 1 TD (although he was very close on another)
but he's still a must start in my book.   He's too good and has too many
weapons.   Terrell Owens is of course a starter but J.J. Stokes or Tai
Streets could be worth a look.   TE Eric Johnson is still very involved in
the passing game.   Dallas ranks # 2 in Passing Yards Allowed Per Game over
the last four weeks so they've been tough.   For the year, they rank # 4 in
Fantasy Points Allowed to QBs and # 3 in Fantasy Points Allowed to WRs.
Tough matchups but I don't see how you can sit Garcia and Owens unless
you're just loaded.   See our cheatsheet rankings for exactly where we see
these guys ranked.

/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/

Bryant Analytics, Inc.   All Rights Reserved 1999-2001

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
cheatsheets-unsubscribe@egroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/


NewPower to offer another pilot program to Houston employees

Free remote energy management solution helps you to manage rising energy
bills.
NewPower is launching a revolutionary technology pilot to the first 500
people to sign up in the Houston area.  The NewPower Connections Remote
Energy Management Solution is a pilot program designed to give consumers
control of their thermostat via the Internet.  The program will allow
thermostats to be adjusted from anywhere, with any Internet-enabled device,
including computers, web-enabled cell phones, palm OS devices, or pocket
PCs.  Sears Home Central will install and service the Remote Energy
Management Solution at no charge throughout the duration of the pilot
program.  For a typical household, the three-month pilot could result in up
to 10 percent to 15 percent utility bill savings, based on personal usage and
the size of your home.

Be among the first to participate absolutely free.
Enrollment with the NewPower Connections Remote Energy Management Solution
pilot program starts May 14 and continues through the end of the month.  For
more information about this offer, visit NewPower's table located in the
Plaza of the Enron Building near the down escalator from 11:00 a.m. to 2 p.m.
during the week of May 14.  To become a pilot participant you need only to be
a homeowner in the Houston area and have Internet access.  You do not even
have to be a NewPower electricity customer to participate.  For more
information about NewPower Connections, send an e-mail to
connections@newpower.com.

Disclaimers:
Any contract for goods or services that is entered into by an Enron employee
with respect to the NewPower program shall be solely between NewPower and
such employee.  Enron assumes no obligation on behalf of NewPower and makes
no representations, warranties, or guaranties with respect to NewPower, any
goods or services offered or provided by NewPower.  Home.Enron.com


----- Forwarded by Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT on 06/26/2000 10:01 AM -----

	Elliot Fullwood@ECT
	06/26/2000 07:38 AM

		 To: Mark Taylor@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Enron North America Corp. NYMEX Hedge Exemption Applications

Mark,

I do not understand this.  Please explain.
-------------------------

Elliot Fullwood,

Enron Europe Finance and Trading Ltd.           Tel: +44 (0)20 7783 0000
40 Grosvenor Place                                                 Direct:
+44 (0)20 7783 6906
LONDON
Fax: +44 (0)20 7783 9018
SW1X 7EN

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  Mark Taylor @ ENRON                           22/06/2000 01:39

Sent by: Enron Announcements@ENRON
To: Everyone_in_ECT_Calgary, Everyone_in_ECT_London, Everyone_in_ECT_Denver,
Everyone_in_ECT_Singapore
cc:

Subject: Enron North America Corp. NYMEX Hedge Exemption Applications

We are in the process of preparing applications for position limit exemptions
for ENA,s NYMEX energy commodities futures trading.  These applications
require that ENA represent whether its officers, employees, owners, or agents
have a power of attorney, control or have a financial interest in any other
related commodity future(s) account either individually or acting with
another person pursuant to express or implied agreement.

Please direct any responses to my paralegal, Tana Jones, via intercompany
email or call her at (713) 853-3399 by the end of business Friday, June 30,
2000 if you have any power of attorney, control or have a financial interest
in any commodity futures account (other than an ENA or other trading
affiliate account).

IF YOU DO NOT HAVE A COMMODITY FUTURES ACCOUNT, YOU DO NOT NEED TO RESPOND TO
THIS REQUEST.


Attached is a revised draft of the above, blacklined against our prior draft
dated 3/6/01.  When the draft is ready for distribution to Nevada Power, a
new blackline will need to be generated showing all changes from their draft
as this one only shows the changes from our recent call.  Andrea is still
working on a short memo on how the transmission credits are calculated and
may have a few more changes to one or two sections, but I thought I would get
this draft out so you can be looking at it.  As I recall, Dale was also going
to see if he could find some additional definitional or other language here
and there so please send that if it could be located.  We did make revisions
to at least two of those items, Emergency and Abnormal Condition so you might
look those over.  We also still need to hear from David Marshall on the
insurance provisions.  The name of the entity is probably not correct (as it
is not a Cogen and may not exist yet?) so I put it in brackets (it is
definitely not correct if it is ultimately to be the same entity as owns the
existing facility).  If you want to provide the notice parties/addresses we
can fill that in now as well.  We still have to work through the exhibits but
that is probably best put off until Nevada Power has provided most of the
information from their side.  Let me know when you'd like to discuss.
Thanks.  JM

John Maas
LeBoeuf, Lamb, Greene & MacRae
303-291-2614
jmaas@llgm.com

The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to
which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged
material.  Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or
taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or
entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited.   If you received
this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any
computer.

 - LVCIA.doc


Marylyn
Do you have a problem with me taking this to the prayer ministry tonight?

marylyn y green <witness4him3@juno.com> on 12/10/2000 02:31:46 PM
To: lamace@alaska.net, jjean99@aol.com, agapetvl@swbell.net,
linda.kirk@excite.com, 23mikena11@prodigy.net, mjee@msn.com,
rimapm@earthlink.com, denise.moore@dhs.state.tx.us, cashley@poha.com,
dana.davis@enron.com, cmontgomery@kmg.com
cc:
Subject: prayer

I am writing to each of you because I need you to be in prayer with me
this week.

For the past two months, I have been going to the doctor, because of a
lump I found
under my arm.  As a result of that I have had to have a mammogram and an
ultrasound of
my breast.  Both test came back abnormal and  I am seeing a specialist
this week to
determine if I need to have a biopsy or not.

Since God has given me the task of
doing a mighty work for him the devil has been busy.

I trust and believe that God will heal.  God gave me a revelation several
months
ago that ALL IS WELL since that time, my husband and I have reunited our
family,
we have been blessed tremendously in more ways than I can share with you
at
this time, however, in the midst of those blessings, the devil has gotten
mad.  So he
has decided to try and pull me down once again.  I refuse to be brought
down off this
spiritual high that is truly a blessing from God.

That is why I am calling on all you prayer warriors
I need you to be in prayer with me this week.  I see the specialist on
Thursday
and I will know then if I need to have the biopsy.

God Bless Each of you
and
Season's Greetings

Love

Marylyn
________________________________________________________________
GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO!
Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less!
Join Juno today!  For your FREE software, visit:
http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj.


Cheryl,

Regarding the J.P. Morgan electronic agreements in connection with the
existing brokerage accounts, ECT Investments has an account with J.P. Morgan
but I see no record of an account with ENA either in Lotus Notes or in the
files.


The response to eHRonline has been extremely positive, with over 1500 people
using the system on the first day alone!  Though many of you have experienced
success, some of you are logging on and encountering some "bumps" -- mainly
questions relating to your system ID or issues related to your web browser
settings.  Those with questions or issues have been calling the COE and some
are having to wait due to the increased call volume.

To increase our accessibility during this phase of implementation, we are . .
.

increasing our call center staffing to decrease your wait time.
working with the Business Unit IT departments to resolve individual browser
setting issues.

To help us help you, please . . .

Take a screen shot of any error message you receive and send it to the COE at
SAP COE/Corp/Enron or SAP.COE@enron.com.
Be patient over the next few days when calling the COE -- remember that we
are adding over 8500 new users.
Have the following information available when you call:
Your name, location, extension, and business unit
Your personnel number, if you know it
The exact text of any error message you receive

We appreciate your cooperation.

COE -- the SAP Support Organization
713.843.4SAP (4727)


Thank you for your changes and updates.  Attached is the updated Executive
Committee List.
Please note that this list is to be printed on legal-size paper.


We've updated the Merger Q&A document on our Enron Updates site ( <http://home.enron.com/updates/mergerQA.html>), as a result of the many questions you've had concerning the merger between Enron and Dynegy. Questions addressed include those about Enron stock options, benefits and immigration status. Please stay tuned for additional updates.


---------------------- Forwarded by Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT on 03/20/2001 02:36
PM ---------------------------

"Robert Weisenmiller" <rbw@mrwassoc.com> on 03/20/2001 01:25:57 PM
To: Alan.Comnes@enron.com, Michael Etringer/HOU/ECT, Terry W Donovan/HOU/ECT,
Julie Sarnowski/HOU/ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: Dow Jones says CPUC will "Order" utiltities to pay QFs $1 bil

Two articles on QFs.

  http://www.latimes.com/news/state/20010320/t000024257.html
Back to story

Tuesday, March 20, 2001
Small Power Firms' Cutbacks Contribute to Blackouts
 Outages: Alternative generators of solar, wind and biomass energy, and
smaller gas-fired plants, haven't been paid since November.

By JULIE TAMAKI, Times Staff Writer

     SACRAMENTO--The rolling blackouts that swept California on Monday were
sparked in part by a crucial group of small energy producers that have cut
supplies to the state's utilities because they are not being paid.
     California's power supply dropped Monday when alternative producers
reduced output or went offline, cutting their usual deliveries to utilities
in half. The lost electricity--more than seven times the cuts the companies
were making just weeks ago--could have served 3 million homes.
     "I think we're just getting at a breaking point for many of these
businesses," said Ed Tomeo, president of UAE Energy Operations Corp., a San
Ramon company that operates a biomass plant and a small gas-fired plant.
     Tomeo said he expects to take his gas-fired plant offline today because
he's run out of money to buy natural gas.
     Tomeo's firm is among the nearly 700 alternative energy producers that
generate more than a fourth of the power consumed in California.
Collectively, the group estimates it is owed $1.5 billion by the state's two
largest utilities.
     Big out-of-state power producers are getting paid because the state
stepped in to buy electricity for the foundering utilities.
     But the California producers of solar, wind and biomass energy and,
typically, smaller gas-fired generators, have received no payments since
November from Southern California Edison and only partial payments from
Pacific Gas & Electric Co. for December and January deliveries.
     Edison's debt to the producers is estimated at $835 million as of March
1. PG&E's debt to the producers was $651 million as of March 8.
     Jim Detmers, director of the California Independent System Operator, the
agency that operates the state's power grid, said Monday's shortfall from the
alternative producers was mostly caused by reduced output by about a dozen
companies that have been cutting back electricity deliveries for the past two
months.
     Detmers said he could not say whether the action was orchestrated, but
it appeared to be a business decision.
     The cuts have grown from about 400 megawatts a day in early February to
3,000 megawatts over the last several days, according to state officials.
     Assemblyman Fred Keeley, a Boulder Creek Democrat, said he did not blame
the small producers, who are formally referred to as "qualifying facilities,"
for shutting down.
     "Although I feel it is unfortunate for consumers, I don't blame [them]
at all," Keeley said. "They're the only ones generating electricity and not
getting paid."
     Keeley said he will revive efforts to pass legislation that would ensure
that the alternative energy producers get paid while cutting their rates. A
previous effort to slash the rates paid to the group, SB 47X by Keeley and
Sen. Jim Battin (R-La Quinta), appears doomed.
     Gov. Gray Davis huddled for more than two hours with Democratic
legislative leaders Monday, after keeping his distance for several weeks, and
an agreement emerged to give small generators a choice: Take a higher price
in exchange for short-term commitments to buy their power, or accept a lower
price in exchange for a multiyear commitment to buy their power, sources who
attended the meeting said.
     And the governor and Legislature would quickly devise a way to ensure
that the producers start getting paid, at least for power they continue to
produce. As long as the utilities are collecting money from their customers,
Davis later told a labor group, "they're going to make the payments."
     The alternative producers' rates are pegged to the price of natural gas,
which has skyrocketed in recent months. Driving down and stabilizing their
prices is a critical factor in Davis' overall plan of buying power without
imposing additional consumer rate hikes.
     As a growing number of unpaid producers have dropped offline, state
officials have been forced to purchase replacement supplies on the pricey
spot market. A worst-case scenario materialized Monday, when a lack of
electricity supplies forced state officials to order rolling blackouts.
     "A number of plants are out for maintenance, but it's very clear to me
that there are a significant number that are off due to nonpayment," said Jan
Smutny-Jones, executive director of the Independent Energy Producers. "My
concern is that this is a prelude to what we'll see this summer."
     PG&E spokesman John Nelson described the alternative producers as
victims of the state's energy meltdown. "Many of these generators are
relatively small enterprises that cannot afford to continue operating on a
daily basis."
     Nelson said his company's inability to fully pay the producers it has
contracts with is caused by the rate freeze that bars PG&E from passing the
true cost of electricity on to customers.

* * *
     Times staff writers Miguel Bustillo, Nancy Rivera Brooks, Dan Morain and
Nancy Vogel contributed to this story.
Copyright 2001 Los Angeles Times

steven k. says the la times is closer to correct (going forward costs but
not payables)

Bob

At 12:46 PM 3/20/01 -0800, you wrote:
>Bob,
>
>
>
>If you learn anything more than what's in the papers, send it my way.
>       Thanks.
>
>
>
>Alan
>
>
>cc:
>
>Subject:  Dow Jones says CPUC will "Order" utiltities to pay QFs $1 bil
>
>Here's the link:
>
>http://quicken.excite.com/investments/news_center/article/printer.dcg?story=/
news/stories/dj/20010320/ON20010320000069.htm
>
>Sue Mara
>Enron Corp.
>Tel: (415) 782-7802
>Fax:(415) 782-7854


of course..............


http://livelink.enron.co.uk/LiveLink/LiveLink.exe/150034/M_-_How_to_find_'Meta
ls_Integrations_Project'_in_LiveLink.doc?func=doc.Fetch&nodeid=150034

We are uploading the contents of S:\MG to the folder labelled S MG Dump at
the end of each day.
So to have your information included in this Livelink database simply put the
file into S:\MG
If you have any images which you would like to put through Optical Character
Recognition (so that one can search on the text in diagrams) please contact
Camilla Bydal.

Enjoy!
Richard


Thank you again for attending last Thursday's meeting with Ken Lay.  As a
follow-up to the meeting, I'm attaching a letter that outlines the five-point
solution Ken discussed.  The governor and legislators need to hear from
California's business leaders about a comprehensive solution that addresses
the short- and long-term problems of California's energy crisis.  Please sign
this letter and send it to the following key legislators -- and to any
legislators with whom you have a good relationship:
 Governor Gray Davis
 Assembly Speaker Robert Hertzberg
 Senate President Pro Tem John Burton
 Assembly Speaker Pro Tem Fred Keeley
 Assembly Republican Leader Dave Cox
 Senator Debra Bowen

Please send me or Ken Lay a copy of the letter, and keep us updated on any
feedback you receive from the governor and legislators.  Thank you for your
assistance in helping advance a solution to California's energy crisis.  If
you have any questions or need additional information, please call me.

Sincerely,

Karen Denne
Vice President
Enron Public Relations
713-853-9757 - phone
713-853-6790 - fax


Here are some photos of my sister's wedding over Thanksgiving weekend.

An

>From: cla@houston.rr.com
>To: an1229@hotmail.com
>Subject: Welcome to my photo album!
>Date: Fri Dec 01 15:34:50 PST 2000
>
>Here are the photos I Dung Em took with Kit's new digital camera.
>
>It's easy to view my new photo album.  Just go to the Web page below.
>http://www.ofoto.com/I.jsp?m=5899868703&n=1944087734
>
>When you get to Ofoto, you may be asked to register or sign in.
>To register, just fill out the form, then click on Join to take
>advantage of great Ofoto services. To sign in, simply use your
>Ofoto log in and password.
>
>For your convenience, our customer service center is open seven
>days a week. Should you have any questions, please contact us
>by email at support@ofoto.com, by phone at 1-877-986-3686 (510-898-6226),
>or by fax at 510-898-6249.
>
>
>
>-------------------------------------------------------------
>Ofoto Support Team:
>http://www.ofoto.com
>Customer Support Email: service@ofoto.com
>Customer Service: (800) 360-9098
>Outside the US and Canada: (510) 898-6226
>Customer Support Fax: (510) 898-6249
>-------------------------------------------------------------
>

______________________________________________________________________________
_______
Get more from the Web.  FREE MSN Explorer download : http://explorer.msn.com


Well, given the impressive results of Friday's game, I suppose I should've
taken the bet...I mean I knew we were good, but I didn't realize we were THAT
good.  Watching the game I couldn't help but remember some comments made not
too long ago about this being a building season and that the Horns would be a
force to be reckoned with come the next two seasons - - I love it when I'm
right.  With an increasingly more confident sophomore quarterback leading the
charge and three (count them three) very mature freshman receivers all eager
to make big plays, not to mention last year's top quarterback recruit Chance
Mock serving as a back-up, next season promises to be something to watch.  My
condolences on your prospects not looking quite as bright .

Hope you had a nice Thanksgiving and good luck helping all of your Aggie
co-workers through this trying time.

Susan

(Oh and Chip, I'd store the Gig'em sweater-vest away for the next 360 days or
so if you want to avoid any post-game ridicule...in a round about way you are
an "Ag" man now.)


HERE ARE THE PICKS FOR ROUND 2:

Tom: 		Pittsburgh
Guzman:	Pittsburgh
Steve:		Pittsburgh
Broker:		Pittsburgh
Holden: 	Buffalo

It could be over after this round!


Steve;

As you requested.


Group,
We will have a meeting on Thursday of next week at 4 PM (Pizza will be provided--finally) on JAN 24th. I hope our transition to UBS from Enron will be complete by next Wednesday. If so, we will be discussing what we hope to achieve this year and the look of the floor going forward. If not, this meeting will likely be postponed. Please call me with any questions.

Thanks,
Bill


Hi there,

Could you please print these for me?  Thanks.

FYI: I'm going to antitrust training from 230 to 430.  Bet you are jealous.

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 08/11/2000 01:53
PM ---------------------------

	From:  Gregg Penman                           08/11/2000 10:22 AM

To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: MEH Policies

FYI -- Here is the e-mail we discussed regarding the most current versions of
each policy.

Gregg
---------------------- Forwarded by Gregg Penman/Corp/Enron on 08/11/2000
10:21 AM ---------------------------

	From:  Gregg Penman                           08/09/2000 05:23 PM

To: j.pokorny@pecorp.com
cc:
Subject: MEH Policies

Welcome back.  I am sure you have been looking forward to getting all these
documents, so here they are.  Attached are the following:

1)

Current draft of the MEH Risk Policy.  Kay, Mary and I have discussed the
current draft line by line and are at the point where your review is needed
to proceed.  Vlady has reviewed the current draft and has no significant
changes.

2)

Current draft of the Risk Procedures and Control Guidelines and accompanying
flowcharts.  Brent Price and his team have reviewed the Procedures and have
provided revisions where appropriate.  Linda and Mary have also provided
input which has been incorporated.  I need to circulate the draft to all
parties one more time to make sure everyone is comfortable with the last
updates and that there are no inconsistencies.

3)

Current draft of the credit policy as last revised by Aparna.  The draft was
sent last night to Molly Harris at Enron for her review and I am currently
waiting to hear from her.  If there are any changes to this draft I will
notify you promptly and forward the newest draft.

4)
Current draft of the proposed cash management policy.  Jim Burns has reviewed
the proposed cash management policy and is in general agreement with the
procedures.  We will be drafting a Facility Agreement shortly which will
cover the specifics of the Enron Revolver to MEH.

As for reports and a general understanding of limit development, modeling,
stress testing, etc., there have been several meetings over the last week.
Brent Price and his team were in Chicago last week to go over the daily
reports with Linda, Tim, Maria, Kay and Mary and discuss the development of
the Daily Position Report (DPR). To my knowledge, the only outstanding report
is the DPR.  The DPR you received on Tuesday was not an MEH only DPR and was
not scrubbed before it was sent out.  It was intended to show the format, but
they inadvertently pulled numbers into it.  I am expecting that a scrubbed
DPR will be sent out end of this week (Since the EMW and MEH books are
currently "flat", the DPR will not show any open positions or VAR - we can
discuss in more detail if you want).  Regarding risk management
methodologies, Mary has had discussions with Vlady and our research staff and
I have received positive feedback regarding the sharing of information.

I realize this is a large amount of information to digest, but I would like
to get together as soon as you have a chance to review the policies and talk
to Mary, Kay, Linda, etc. in order to come up with a list of any remaining
issues.  I acknowledge that this should and will be a evolutionary process,
but I also want to have a clear direction of what is necessary to approve the
policies.   Just let me know when you are available and I will make myself
available.

Thanks,

Gregg


Elena,

The new research web page looks very nice.

Recently I have a few users who called me about the links to exotica options
library.
I checked, both links to Exotica.doc and example spreadsheets do not work.

I appreciate that if you could re-establish the links as soon as possible.

Thanks.

Zimin


Attention supervisors and managers! ;
;
Would you like to improve your ability to lead and manage your team?; The EWS
Development Center would like to invite you to The Managers Level Impact and
Influence Program.
;
Date: ;; ;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;; ;June 14th and 15th
Time: ;;;;;;;;;;;;;; ;;;;;;;;;;; ;8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. (both days)
Place ;; ;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;; ;Travis Room 1 at the Double Tree Hotel Down
Town
Cost:;;; ;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;; $1,500
Target Audience:;;;;;;;;; Sr. Specialist and Managers in a supervisory role
CPE credits available
;
;
Innovative Leadership is the cornerstone of Enron's ability to motivate and
retain the industry's top talent.; The Organizational Development and
Learning group would like to invite all Enron managers to participate in a
new leadership overview course.
;
This workshop will offer the tools you'll need to lead and manage others more
effectively.; In this course you'll gain knowledge and insight on leadership
capabilities and receive resources you can readily apply at work.; This
two-day program, involving a maximum of 16 participants, has been
specifically built to give Enron managers the information they need to
succeed in our work environment.;; It is an interactive workshop including
individual and group exercises designed to drive home insights and build
skills that are relevant to your job.;;
;
Topic areas include:
?;;;;;;; What is Leadership?
?;;;;;;; Leadership Credibility
?;;;;;;; Thinking Strategically
?;;;;;;; Managing Change
?;;;;;;; Directing Others
?;;;;;;; Leading Teams
?;;;;;;; Influencing Others;;
;
Participants will be asked to complete a short self-assessment before coming
to the program.; Additionally, each participant will leave with a detailed
action plan and other resources to help manage their group and prepare for
the next level of leadership.
;
To register for this class, log on to InvestInMe at
http://www.corptraining.com/index.cfm?company=enron.
If you have any questions, please call 713 853-1816.
;


Carol St. Clair
EB 3892
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT on 08/24/00 08:11 AM -----

	"CHRIS KRECEK" <KRECC@andrews-kurth.com>
	08/23/00 02:47 PM

		 To: <alan.quaintance@enron.com>, <brenda.l.funk@enron.com>,
<Carol.St.Clair@enron.com>, <charles.delacey@enron.com>,
<Clement.abrams@enron.com>, <David.roland@enron.com>,
<Gina.Karathanos@enron.com>, <joel.ephross@enron.com>,
<tina.livingston@enron.com>, <Trevor.Randolph@enron.com>,
<trushar.patel@enron.com>, <mniebruegge@mayerbrown.com>,
<tellwood@mayerbrown.com>, <eawilburn@prickett.com>, <Tamullen@prickett.com>,
<kenton@rlf.com>, <Mercedes.arango@us.cibc.com>, <schottla@us.cibc.com>,
<wolfmark@us.cibc.com>, <ARoberts@WilmingtonTrust.com>
		 cc: "David Barbour" <BARBD@andrews-kurth.com>, "MURIEL McFARLING"
<MCFAM@andrews-kurth.com>, "Michael Thimmig" <THIMM@andrews-kurth.com>
		 Subject: Enron/McGarret C

In connection with the Hawaii 125-0 McGarret C transaction scheduled to close
August 31, 2000, attached in WordPerfect format are the following closing
documents marked against the McGarret B Series:

Closing Checklist (254308);
Asset Notice (254309);
Series Certificate of Beneficial Ownership (254316);
Series Supplement (254319);
Drawdown Request (254322);
Total Return Swap Confirmation (254324);
Put Option Agreement (254334);
Put Option Assignment (254341);
Notice of Put Option Assignment (254345);
Promissory Note (Big Island III) (254347);
B Interest Assignment Agreement (254349);
Warrant Assignment (254351);
Amended and Restated LLC Agreement (McGarret III) (254352);
Amended and Restated LLC Agreement (Big Island) (254356);
Receipt of Asset LLC (254362);
Receipt of Transferor (254365);
Receipt of Trust (254366);
Independent Auctioneer Letter Agreement (254369);
Sale and Auction Agreement (254372);
Direction Letter (254376); and
General Opinion of A&K (254385).

If you have any questions or comments, please call Muriel McFarling at (214)
659-4461.  Thank you.

Chris Krecek, Secretary/Legal Assistant
Andrews & Kurth L.L.P.
1717 Main Street, Suite 3700
Dallas, Texas 75201
Phone: (214) 659-4481
Fax: (214) 659-4401
Email: ckrecek@andrews-kurth.com

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:  The information in this e-mail (including any
attachments) is confidential, legally privileged and intended only for the
use of each recipient named above.  If you are not an intended recipient, you
must not read, use or disseminate this information.  If you have received
this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail
and delete this e-mail from your computer.
VIRUS WARNING:  Although this e-mail (including any attachments) is not
intended to contain any virus or defect that may affect your computer, you
are responsible for ensuring that no virus or defect exists.  The sender
disclaims any responsibility for any loss or damages arising from any virus
or defect associated with this e-mail.

 - 254385.wpd
 - 254309.wpd
 - 254316.wpd
 - 254319.wpd
 - 254322.wpd
 - 254324.wpd
 - 254334.wpd
 - 254341.wpd
 - 254345.wpd
 - 254347.wpd
 - 254349.wpd
 - 254351.wpd
 - 254352.wpd
 - 254362.wpd
 - 254365.wpd
 - 254366.wpd
 - 254369.wpd
 - 254372.wpd
 - 254376.wpd
 - 254308.wpd


-----Original Message-----
From: 	navigator@nisource.com@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-navigator+40nisource+2Ecom+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Wednesday, June 06, 2001 4:36 AM
To:	navigator@nisource.com
Subject:	CAPACITY UPDATE EFFECTIVE FOR THURSDAY,  JUNE 7, 2001

                      COLUMBIA GAS TRANSMISSION CORPORATION
                        NOTICE TO ALL INTERESTED PARTIES
                                  JUNE 06, 2001

Notice ID: 2778
5 - NO RESPONSE REQUIRED

SUBJECT: CAPACITY UPDATE EFFECTIVE FOR THURSDAY, JUNE 7, 2001

                NO CHANGES FROM PREVIOUS DAY

Effective Thursday, June 7, 2001, capacities will be as follows:

Excess MDWQ              Available +
ISS Withdrawals          Available
SIT Withdrawals          Available
Imbalance Drawdowns      Available
PAL Lends/Unparks        Available

Excess MDIQ              Not Available +
ISS Injections           Not Available
SIT Injections           Not Available
Imbalance Paybacks       Not Available
PAL Parks/Loan Paybacks  Not Available

+ Call Gas Control 24 hours in advance at (304) 357-2606 to request approval.

Receipt capacity will be as follows:

TENNESSEE:

Brinker (B12)            20,000
Broad Run (B9)          450,000
Cambridge (B10)          20,000
Dungannon (B11)          50,000
Highland (B17)           25,000
Milford (B18)            15,000
North Greenwood (B22)         0
Unionville (B15)         50,000

TEXAS EASTERN:

Delmont (C16)                 0
Eagle (C22)              30,000
Hooker (C9)              50,000
Pennsburg (C23)          50,000
Windridge (C12)          50,000

NATIONAL FUEL:

Independence (M1)        10,000
Ellwood City (L1)        10,000

TRANSCO:

Downingtown (E3)          5,000
Emporia I (E13)         120,000
Rockville (E2)           65,000
Dranesville (E1)         25,000

ALGONQUIN:

Ramapo (R1)              50,000

ANR:

Paulding/Cecil          105,000
(F1, A2)

LEBANON AGGREGATE       195,000
(A4, F2, C4, D3)

TOLEDO AGGREGATE        225,000
(A3, F4, 734462)

COLUMBIA GULF:
(801)

TCO-Leach             2,218,000

Internal point non-firm capacity will be as follows:

Lanham                No Restrictions

Delivery capacity (non-firm) will be as follows:

TRANSCO:

Martins Creek (MA 21)    25,000
Young Woman's Creek      15,000
   (MA 36)

ALGONQUIN:

Hanover (MA 22)         166,000

EQUITRANS:

Fallen Timber (MA 35)    35,000
(MLI K1)

Waynesburg-Rhinehart     30,000
(MA 26) (MLI K2)

OPT-30 will be available in all market areas.
OPT-60 will be available in all market areas.

Market Area delivery capacity (non-firm) will be as follows:

Operating Area 1
     Market Area 33       No Restrictions
     Market Area 34       No Restrictions

Operating Area 2
     Market Area 20       No Restrictions

Operating Area 3
     Market Area 15       No Restrictions
     Market Area 16       No Restrictions
     Market Area 17       No Restrictions
     Market Area 18       No Restrictions
     Market Area 19       No Restrictions

Operating Area 4
     Market Area 21       No Restrictions
     Market Area 22       No Restrictions
     Market Area 23       No Restrictions
     Market Area 24       No Restrictions
     Market Area 25       No Restrictions
     Market Area 29       No Restrictions

Operating Area 5
     Market Area 02       No Restrictions
     Market Area 07       No Restrictions

Operating Area 6
     Market Area 10       No Restrictions
     Market Area 11       No Restrictions
     Market Area 12       No Restrictions
     Market Area 13       No Restrictions
     Market Area 14       No Restrictions

Operating Area 7
     Market Area 01       No Restrictions
     Market Area 03       No Restrictions
     Market Area 04       No Restrictions
     Market Area 05       No Restrictions
     Market Area 06       No Restrictions
     Market Area 08       No Restrictions
     Market Area 09       No Restrictions

Operating Area 8
     Market Area 26       No Restrictions
     Market Area 27       No Restrictions
     Market Area 32       No Restrictions
     Market Area 35       No Restrictions
     Market Area 36       No Restrictions
     Market Area 38       No Restrictions
     Market Area 39       No Restrictions
     Market Area 40       No Restrictions

Operating Area 10
     Market Area 28       No Restrictions
     Market Area 30       No Restrictions
     Market Area 31       No Restrictions

If you have any questions, please contact your Account
Representative.


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Hanagriff, Richard
Sent:	Thursday, December 13, 2001 11:27 AM
To:	Schoolcraft, Darrell; Lokay, Michelle
Subject:	TW imbalance summary

Darrell

This report shows the Williams balance that has accrued in December.


----- Forwarded by Susan J Mara/NA/Enron on 12/11/2000 11:18 AM -----

	"Daniel Douglass" <Douglass@ArterHadden.com>
	12/11/2000 10:36 AM

		 To: <Barbara_Klemstine@apsc.com>, <dcazalet@apx.com>, <BillR@calpine.com>,
<jackp@calpine.com>, <glwaas@calpx.com>, <Ken_Czarnecki@calpx.com>,
<cabaker@duke-energy.com>, <gavaughn@duke-energy.com>,
<rjhickok@duke-energy.com>, <gtbl@dynegy.com>, <KEWH@dynegy.com>,
<jdasovic@enron.com>, <susan_j_mara@enron.com>, <curt.Hatton@gen.pge.com>,
<foothill@lmi.net>, <camiessn@newwestenergy.com>,
<jcgardin@newwestenergy.com>, <rsnichol@newwestenergy.com>,
<Nam.Nguyen@powersrc.com>, <rllamkin@seiworldwide.com>,
<Roger.Pelote@Williams.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: FERC Order

The following is an excerpt from a FERC order issued on Friday:

"Ridgewood Power LLC (Ridgewood) filed comments suggesting that the shortage
of supply could be remedied in part by relaxing the operating efficiency and
other regulatory requirements pertaining to Qualifying Facilities (QFs).
Ridgewood states that the total power production capacity of QFs in
California is approximately 9,000 MWs, of which, between 4,000 and 5,500 MW
are from qualifying cogeneration facilities (Cogeneration QFs) and the
remainder from small power production facilities (Small Power QFs).
Ridgewood states that the Cogeneration segment of the industry is
underutilized because of operating efficiency and other QF requirements.
With a limited waiver or other equivalent relief, Ridgewood states that these
underutilized resources could help relieve current shortages during both peak
and off-peak periods.  Ridgewood estimates that as much as 1,000 MWs would be
immediately available by allowing QFs to sell to the purchasing utility or
into the competitive market their "above-baseline" output for a limited time
period.   Ridgewood suggests that any such sale would be made at market-based
rates and would not be subject to the operating and efficiency
standards......... Section 292.205(c) of the Commission's regulations
provides that the Commission may waive any of its operating and efficiency
standards "upon a showing that the facility will produce significant energy
savings".   However, the Commission has exercised its waiver authority in a
number of cases based on factors such as the limited durations of the
requested waiver, whether further waivers would be necessary, whether the
request was intended to remedy specific problems associated with an
innovative technology, and whether granting waiver would fulfill PURPA's
goals.   We find that many of these same factors are present here.
Consistent with the goals of PURPA, we find that granting such waiver in this
circumstance will provide for increased efficiency in the use of the
Cogeneration facilities and improved reliability of electric service through
increasing the availability of needed capacity.  Therefore, we will grant
temporary waiver of the operating and efficiency standards to Cogeneration
QFs for sales into California, effective as of the date of this order.  We
will terminate the waiver effective January 1, 2001."

Let me know if you want the entire order.

Dan


Steve Kean asked that you review this memo to Ken Lay.  Please let me know
as soon as possible if you have any changes.

After your review/comments - I will forward it to Ken Lay.

Thanks.


Thanks.

-----Original Message-----
From: Hu, Sylvia
Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2001 3:24 PM
To: Sellers, Emily
Subject: RE: Lexis/Nexus

Emily:

Lexis won't allow ID to be transferred from one group to another.  I'll request a new ID for Bill Rapp under your group and cancel his EES ID.

Sylvia
x36775

-----Original Message-----
From: Sellers, Emily
Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2001 2:49 PM
To: Hu, Sylvia
Subject: Lexis/Nexus

Sylvia, we have a new attorney from EES Legal ( Bill Rapp) starting in our group on October 22nd.  Will he need a new ID & Password set up with Lexis?  He probably has one already under EES Legal but I wasn't sure how that works.  Let me know your thoughts.  Thanks.

Emily
3-7172