Something EVERY business needs, a Merchant Account!

A Merchant Account is the hardware and software which gives
you the ability to allow customers to pay using any credit
card such as Visa, Master Card, American Express, Discover
etc., and other forms of payment such as e-Checks, Debit
Cards and secure Internet based payment.

We offer several different packages, any of which can be
custom tailored to your needs. Services are currently
provided to the United States only.

To make a purchase or ask questions regarding our services,
please reply to this email with your full name, phone
number (with area code) and if possible a good time to
have us contact you. You are under no obligations. A sales
rep will contact you and will be able to address any of
your questions or needs.

Thank You

*****
To be removed from our mailing list, reply to this email
with the word 'Remove' in the subject line.
*****

f4q8ok


I have a couple of questions about the GELP contract.  First, in the
agreement's Attachment A, there are several fuel contracts agreements listed
that GELP has (or had) in place with various counterparties.  I'm wondering
what the status of these agreements is--have they expired, are they still in
place, etc.  These agreements are:
Purchase Agreements:
 Union Pacific Fuels--I understand that this is the Duke contract that
currently supplies GELP--Can we get a copy of this agreement?
 Tejas Power Corporation--Expired ???
 Columbia Energy Services Corporation dated 1/15/96 - Expired ???
Storage Agreements
 Columbia Gas Transmission SIT #41825 - Status ??
Transportation Agreements
 CGT-IT agreement #41828 - I'm assuming this is the agreement used to get gas
to GELP--is Duke or CES agent on this?
 Commonwealth Gas Services - same question as CGT IT agreement
  Note:  According to the billing calculations, it appears that the Duke
supply arrangement must have some
   FT transport--whose name is that in?
Other Contracts
 Transco - to be acquired - Is there an IT agreement on Transco that is
used?  If so, we need contract # and is someone agent on the transport?

Also, in the GELP agreement you indicated that you get real time meter
information from a Bristol RTU.  How will ENA get this meter information?

Also, just in general--could you explain your perspective on the value
proposition in this agreement?  I understand that there is a $5000 fee you
receive each month that accompanies alot of reporting responsibilities.
Since the data you provided for last year showed very little gas deliveries
in the "winter period" (where you would receive $.05/MMBtu additional
compensation), there doesn't seem to be much up side value there.   Are there
other values you see to this deal that we may be missing?

Thanks for your assistance.


I want to remind you about our All-Employee Meeting this Tuesday, Oct. 23, at 10 a.m. Houston time at the Hyatt Regency.  We obviously have a lot to talk about.  Last week we reported third quarter earnings.  We have also been the subject of media reports discussing transactions with LJM, a related party previously managed by our chief financial officer.  Today, we announced that we received a request for information from the Securities and Exchange Commission regarding related party transactions.

I know you will have a number of questions about these issues and events, which I will address.   As usual, I will be as candid as I can.  I will do my best to provide answers and talk about where we go from here.  I encourage each of you to attend or tune in tomorrow.


Star Wars Special to Feature Enron

This Saturday, March 31, at 6:30 p.m., KPRC Channel 2 will air a half-hour
special on Star Wars: The Magic of Myth, currently on exhibit at the Museum
of Fine Arts, Houston. Hosted by Roseann Rogers of News 2 Houston's the
"Buzz,"  the show also features Enron's own Cindy Olson, Executive Vice
President of Human Resources and Community Relations.

When Star Wars made its debut, it was the most innovative and technologically
advanced film of the time. Its creator changed not only the type of
entertainment the masses would view but also how films and their effects were
created. It,s a motion picture icon and remains a world phenomenon. This
focus on technology and entertainment also led to our decision to make sure
this exhibit made its way to Houston. Technology is what drives business
today and the synergy of entertainment and technology brought out in Star
Wars: The Magic of Myth was a perfect fit for Enron.

We also hope you take the opportunity to view the Star Wars exhibit and Enron
) The Journey Begins in the hallway by the Caf, Express cantina in the
Museum. This &mini-exhibit8 showcases Enron. This is our way of not only
educating the public about Enron and what we do, but to also shows how anyone
can take an idea and bring it to life, like George Lucas did with Star Wars.

Other Star Wars/Enron Upcoming Events...

HOP INTO YOUR X-WING FIGHTER AND FLY ON OVER TO ...
Today's Big E Cafe where Chewbacca and Darth Vader will be joining us for
James Coney Islands' delicious cuisine!
This Sunday is Enron Family Day at the MFA!  Call the MFA box office at
713.639.7771 for ticket information.  Join us this Sunday and you'll get to
enjoy mask making and spaceship building, too!


Enron is proud to be a Charity Partner Sponsor for the 2001 Shell Houston Open being held April 16-22 on the Tournament Players Course at The Woodlands.  The Shell Houston Open ranks No. 2 among PGA TOUR tournaments with charitable donations of $4.5 million.  While today's top players are entertaining you, remember the net proceeds of the tournament will benefit more than 300 local worthy charities in need of a helping hand.

Attached is a list of available tickets, parking passes and various invitations, along with a schedule of events.

To order tickets, please follow the procedures listed below:

PROCEDURE FOR REQUESTING SHELL HOUSTON OPEN TICKETS
1)  Send an E-MAIL request to LAURA PENA with the following information:
	a)  Name of Requester
	b)  Title of Requester
	c)  Company
	d)  Department
	e)  Location
	f)   Telephone
	g)  List of items and quantity of each (please notice tickets are limited)
2)  Distribution is on a first-come, first-served basis. THE ONLY TICKETS LEFT FOR THE SKY BOX ARE FOR WEDNESDAY-NO OTHER SKY BOX TICKETS 		ARE AVAILABLE.
3)  NO PHONE ORDERS WILL BE ACCEPTED

Please keep in mind the sole purpose for these tickets is to entertain our valued customers. Your cost centers will not be charged for the tickets.

If you have any questions, please contact:
	Laura Pena		(713) 853-5376
	Dorie Hitchcock		(713) 853-6978

http://home.enron.com:84/messaging/shelldescript.doc


We will be short in Real Time Position Manager both at NP-15 and SP-15 for
1/18/01 until Friday morning. It seems that four deals were entered by EES
under the wrong desk, affecting our position instead of theirs. Following are
the details of where, when, why and by how much we're out. Read this
carefully....

SP-15 - Short 1950.64 MW
 Deal #500492 - 67.89 MW short off peak
 Deal #500493 - 87.97 MW short on peak

NP-15 - Short 2883.08 MW
 Deal #500494 - 102.61 MW short off peak
 Deal #500495 - 128.89 MW short on peak

If any one of you has better luck than I have at accessing EES deals in deal
entry, by all means get rid of these. Or if you happen to speak with Suneet
Sharma, our good friend who entered the deals in question, by all means tell
him to do the same.

Thanks,
Kate


Oops - that was supposed to be AT&T - Lucent is the one that lasts forever
and deals with the Utility Solutions business.
---------------------- Forwarded by Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT on 02/22/2000 04:10
PM ---------------------------
To: Bryan Seyfried/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Credit Derivatives Reference Entities

I have read the Lucent CA and it is OK to go ahead and keep them on the list
- the CA seems to cover a relatively small transaction and expires on March
25 anyway.

We are in the process of pulling the CA's for Dow, DuPont, GE, IMC, 3M,
Pitney Bowes, Praxair and Sprint.


Stan,

I have the tax folks working away at the second issue you raise.  As I see it, there are two possible ways of splitting the business, if it makes tax sense to do so.  One would be manufacturing/projects and the other would be US/European.  As soon as I get clarity from the tax group, we should discuss.

Thanks,
Mark

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Horton, Stanley
Sent:	Wednesday, December 26, 2001 12:35 PM
To:	Umanoff, Adam
Cc:	Metts, Mark
Subject:	RE: Wind Co - PTC Update

I would like to review the financial projections that will go into the teaser.  Also, have you and Mark discussed the possibility of seperating the US and Europeans business in any possible sale?  It seems to me that our North American business will be heavily discounted given current market conditions.  It may make since to see if this segment fits with the reorganization plan while preserving the European segment for divestiture.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Umanoff, Adam
Sent:	Friday, December 21, 2001 8:02 PM
To:	Horton, Stanley
Cc:	Metts, Mark
Subject:	Wind Co - PTC Update

As you may know by now, Congress has adjourned without extending the PTC (see attached).  The Democrats would not support any extenders bill as leverage to get a Stimulus Package passed and everything died.  The Speaker has asked the President to call Congress back on Jan 2 to debate the Stimulus Package, but that seems unlikely. The best we can now hope for is that Congress takes up PTC either as part of the Stimulus Package or an Energy Bill in Feb/March '02.

For the wind co, this is good and bad.  The good is that while the Enron BK has kept customers away, at least now none of our competitors can book orders either.  My hope is that PTC extension and the announcement of a new owner for EW will happen about the same time.  The bad news is that it means our US business will be further hurt - a 200 unit '02 is now out of reach and a 100-125 unit year may be the best we can hope for (assuming the PTC is extended in Q1).  (Maybe the Candover folks knew something we didn't, although I doubt it).  For sale purposes, we will run our '02 numbers at 150 units and put as positive a spin on it for bidders as we can.  Bottom line is that '02 will be a break-even to small profit year for us in the US.

Stan - we are in the process of revising our financial projections for a teaser to be sent out to bidders next week and this news will be reflected in those projections (meaning that the sale projections will now differ slightly from what we submitted to Enron earlier this week).  Also, we have launched reductions in force in the US.  I will reduce our MFG workforce by around 85 right after the first of the year and expect to have to let another 100-150 go early in Q1.  I will keep you posted.

Adam

---------------------- Forwarded by Adam Umanoff/EWC/Enron on 12/21/2001 05:48 PM ---------------------------

 << OLE Object: Picture (Device Independent Bitmap) >>
Hap Boyd
12/20/2001 10:31 AM
To:	Adam Umanoff/EWC/Enron@ENRON, Eric Newell/EWC/Enron@ENRON, John Lamb/EWC/Enron@ENRON, Bob Gates/EWC/Enron@ENRON, Mike Westbeld/EWC/Enron@Enron, Darrell Orban/EWC/Enron@ENRON, Mary McCann/EWC/Enron@ENRON, Jay Godfrey/EWC/Enron@ENRON, Alan Nueman/EWC/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject:	PTC UPDATE

The House members have left without passing an extenders bill. House Majority Leader Dick Armey refused to let the Extenders Package come to the House floor because he felt it wouls demonstrate to the Senate Democrats that the House Republicans were not serious about the Stimulus Package. Armey and Bill Thomas got into a shouting match on the floor as Thomas tried to get Armey to move the bill. Thomas and Rangel (the ranking Democrat on Ways and Means) had agreed on a one year extension which is also what the Senate Republicans would agree to.
This is partisan politics at its worst. There were no valid public policy reasons to not pass an extenders package
Our only option at this point is to go back in January and try to get the extenders passed. They will be looking at an Economic Stimulus Package again if the economic conditions don't improve. There are 15 expiring provisions in the current bill so we will have alot of other groups fighting for extenders.
My apologies to all of you. I am devasted by this turn of events.
Hap


Regards,
bd


2.,3., 5., and 8 are fine avec moi.

Ernie Patrikis

Privileged and Confidential

-----Original Message-----
From:?? Mary Cunningham [SMTP:MCUNNINGHAM@isda.org]
Sent:?? Thursday, September 07, 2000 11:53 AM
To:???? ISDA BOARD; Richard Grove
Cc:???? Robert Pickel; Ruth Ainslie; Nick Collier; Camille Irens; Yasuko
Horibe; Shigeki Kawano
Subject:??????? Member Applications

The following 9 institutions will go for approval at the next ISDA Board
meeting on September 13, 2000.

Associate Broker
1.? Treasury Connect - an internet-based communication and transaction
platform designed for the execution of currency and interest rate swaps.
2.? Cantor Fitzgerald International

Associate
3.? Allen & Gledhill - Singaporean law firm
4.? Mori Sogo Law Offices - Japanese law firm
5.? O'Melveny & Myers LLP - U.S. law firm
6.? TriOptima - Software Provider (Derk Brouwer's company)

Subscriber
7.? Bayview Financial Trading Group, L.P. - a finance company
8.? Inter-American Development Bank
9.? *Accord Energy Limited - a subsidiary of Centrica plc.? Accord is a
provider of gas and electricity to consumers and a range of other services
related to the home, work and motoring.

*We are checking at this time to see whether Accord Energy should be
applying at the Primary level.


-----Original Message-----
From: McEvoy, Bridget [mailto:Bridget.McEvoy@ElPaso.com]
BN  18:06 Talks Between California, Generators End; No Accord (Correct)

(Corrects lead to say judge recommended FERC hearings to

result disagreements; adds comments from judge in fifth paragraph

and comments from Enron in 13th paragraph.)

Washington, July 9 (Bloomberg) -- A judge who oversaw two

weeks of unsuccessful negotiations aimed at persuading power

sellers to pay refunds in California and other western states

recommended that the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission hold

hearings to resolve disagreements within 60 days.

Two weeks of FERC-ordered talks ended today with the two

sides no closer to an accord.

``In 15 days, you can't work miracles,'' said Curtis Wagner,
FERC's chief administrative law judge. ``The numbers were too far

apart.''

California says it is due a refund of $8.9 billion because

the companies charged excessive prices. Other western states are

also requesting money.

A group of power sellers offered $510 million to California

during the negotiations, scoffing at the state's method of

calculating the refund, Wagner said. Other parties to the talks

offered about $206 million, bringing the total offer from

generators to $716 million.

On Saturday, the state brought in analysts who explained how

the state calculated its estimate. He wasn't convinced by

California's arguments that it should receive $8.9 billion, said

Wagner, who wouldn't provide his own estimate of how much should

be paid.

Wagner said FERC should hold hearings of 60 days or less and

should calculate a refund based on a system it approved for price

caps on June 18. The caps are based on the costs of the highest

priced generator during the early stages of a power shortage.

That formula should be applied retroactively to Oct. 1,

Wagner said. He wouldn't provide an estimate of the size of such a

refund, saying it would require research into fuel prices from

that time period.

Michael Kahn, California's chief negotiator, said the judge's

recommendation was a victory for his state. Wagner's formula would

give his state a refund of ``several billion dollars,'' and

California will sue to get the rest, he said.

``The judge said we're entitled to our money without

releasing any of our claims,'' Kahn told reporters.

Generators were mixed on what Wagner's recommendations meant,

though they agreed the state asked for too much.

``Under the faulty methodology the state has come up with (to

justify the $8.9 billion refund), we would be owed money because

we bought more than we sold in the spot market in the period in

question,'' said Mark Palmer, a spokesman for Enron Corp, one of

the power sellers taking part in the negotiations. ``That's shows

how ridiculous this is.''

Houston-based Enron didn't participate in the offer to refund

$510 million, Palmer said, without being more specific.

``Nothing I've seen suggests that California cares about a

settlement,'' Palmer said. ``What they care about is shifting

blame. What they care about is a witch hunt.''

Duke Energy Corp. is ``very pleased'' by the judge's

recommendations, said Brent Bailey, vice president and general

counsel of the Charlotte-based company. The judge's plan fixes

problems with California's methodology for calculating the

refunds, he said.

California's two biggest utilities have piled up almost $14

billion in debt because of the surging prices that resulted when

the state's plan to deregulate its electricity system failed. The

state began buying power on the utilities' behalf in January and

has spent close to $8 billion.

--Amy Strahan Butler and Jeff Bliss in Washington (202) 624-1975

or jbliss@bloomberg.net and in Washington/mmw/alp/mmw

Bridget McEvoy
Investor Relations
El Paso Corp.
713.420.5597
Bridget.McEvoy@elpaso.com

******************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it from the ElPaso
Corporation are confidential and intended solely for the
use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
If you have received this email in error please notify the
sender.
******************************************************************


Who has worked with Crescendo in addition to Craig Carver?  Despite Richard
Sanders contact's reservations about Carver as a trial litigator, he marked
up and helped negotiate over 20 PSA's for me over a 3 year time frame and I
would recommend him.  He turns things quickly as well.

Gerald Nemec@ECT
01/24/2001 02:07 PM
To: Steve Pruett/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Gathering System PSA

Steve,  We will probably use outside counsel that has worked with Crescendo
before to handle this from Crescendo's perspective.  I will coordinate from
ENA's perspective.  I am working with Teresa on this issue.

	Steve Pruett@ENRON
	01/23/2001 06:00 PM

		 To: Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Gathering System PSA

Can you review the PSA on Crescendo's behalf, or is this something Teresa
Bushman or outside counsel should review?
---------------------- Forwarded by Steve Pruett/Corp/Enron on 01/23/2001
05:26 PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Mark Castiglione                           01/23/2001 04:04 PM

To: Steve Pruett/Corp/Enron@Enron, Scott Josey/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Don
Rollins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Arvel Martin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christopher B
Clark/Corp/Enron@Enron, Mark Whitt/NA/Enron@Enron, Tyrell
Harrison/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Gathering System PSA

FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by Mark Castiglione/Corp/Enron on 01/23/2001
04:03 PM ---------------------------

"Ken" <kckrisa@apex2000.net> on 01/23/2001 03:52:04 PM
Please respond to <kckrisa@apex2000.net>
To: "Audrey O'Neil \(E-mail\)" <Audrey.ONeil@enron.com>, "Gerald R. Nemec
\(E-mail\)" <Gerald.Nemec@enron.com>, "Mark Castiglione \(E-mail\)"
<Mark.Castiglione@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: Gathering System PSA

I received the proposed PSA for the Wildhorse acquisition from Petrie
Parkman today.  I have attached for everyone's review.  We are required to
send back to TBI with proposed changes with our proposal.

Mark, would you please forward to those who need to see it besides Audrey
and Gerald.
Thx

Ken Krisa

 - PSA.DOC


No, we have transported on Tejas a few times this year also (on and off).
Carlos should be able to tell you when.

D

Lauri A Allen
08/17/2000 03:27 PM
To: dfarmer@enron.com
cc: Mary Poorman/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: Re: Tejas Invoice - Deal 120987 Meter 6290/905 (Tejas Gas Pipeline)
Oct 99

Daren- Was 10/99 the only month we transported this Carthage gas on Tejas?
---------------------- Forwarded by Lauri A Allen/HOU/ECT on 08/17/2000 03:20
PM ---------------------------

Mary Poorman@ENRON
08/17/2000 02:55 PM
To: Gregory Steagall/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Fred Boas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kellie Bilski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lauri A
Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Tejas Invoice - Deal 120987 Meter 6290/905 (Tejas Gas Pipeline)
Oct 99

I phoned Doug Trachta at Tejas regarding this issue.  I appears that
nominations were made under ENA's agreement 6520 on Tejas Pipeline Company
from Carthage to Indian Hills.  However, both of these points are actually on
the Tejas Gas Operating.  ENA doesn't have an agreement to ship on Operating,
but HPL does.   I think we need to set up an accounting arrangement to
accomodate this deal, it appears as though ENA would be "piggy-backing" on
HPL's agreement as they actually own the gas.  It appears as though we need
to move the volumes from Pipeline to Operating, at the very least.  How have
other months been handled with respect to this transport?

Please let me know if I may be of any further assistance in resolving this
deal.

Mary

ext. 35251


Please direct all future e-mails to "your vice-presidentship"

	Eric Thode@ENRON
	01/16/2001 08:56 AM

		 To: Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Congratulations

Richard --

Congratulations on the well deserved promotion.  Do I need to bow and kiss
your ring or something like that from now on?  Please let me know.

Eric


Dear Mathew,

Thank you for your interest in receiving a free trial to Natural Gas
Intelligence, the industry's leading news and pricing service since
1981.

This e-mail is automated notification of the availability of your
current Natural Gas Intelligence Newsletter(s). Please use your
username of "msmith9" and your password to access

  http://intelligencepress.com/subscribers/index.html

If you have forgotten your password we can send it to you - please
visit :

  http://intelligencepress.com/password.html

What does a subscription cost?
  Daily Gas Price Index is $861 annually
  Weekly Gas Price Index is $835 annually
  Natural Gas Intelligence is $536 annually

We also have combination pricing for publications:
  ALL three publications are $1,864 annually
  Weekly and Daily are $1,544 annually
  the weeklies (weekly and NGI) are $1,187 annually

These prices are for a single user. Call today about multiple user
discounted subscriptions for your entire office.

Remember, GasMart/Power 2001 is in Tampa, Florida, May 9-11, 2001.
Keep your finger on the pulse of the while networking with colleagues
and discussing industry issues.

Visit www.gasmart.com to register and for more information.

If you would like to stop receiving e-mail notifications when your
publications are available, please reply to this message with REMOVE
E-MAIL in the subject line.

For information about Intelligence Press products and services, visit
our web site at http://intelligencepress.com or call toll-free (800)
427-5747.

ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. (c) 2001, Intelligence Press, Inc.
---


Molly,

Why were the counterparties on your latest list under the Legal tab different
from those under the Credit tab?


Sheila, I need a status report on their contracts as well.  Please change
Hodge to 175, Aronowitz to 190 and Taylor to 190.   Mark

	Sheila Walton/ENRON@enronXgate
	04/23/2001 06:09 PM

		 To: Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Legal VP Comp Info

Mark, attached is a chart of your VPs.  I have inserted a column for
suggested increase amounts.  Call me if you have questions.

Sheila


My pension and group RRSP is with Clarica. Can I transfer those assets to you?

Chris


Info related to the TA1 action item given in the RMS meeting today.

Also attached is the email I originally sent to SET on August 1, 2001.

Thanks,
Dave Darnell
===========
602-432-3353
 - X12-5v4010.pdf
 - ISA_IEA.doc
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: <dave.darnell@systrends.com>
From: "Dave Darnell" <dave.darnell@systrends.com>
To: <set@ercot.com>
Cc: <tdtwg@ercot.com>
Subject: ISA/IEA and GS/GE Control Segments doc - FA Reconciliation
Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2001 15:50:37 -0700
Message-ID: <005901c11adc$63c77d70$a815a8c0@tecradaved>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;	charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627
Importance: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000

Who owns the ISA/IEA and GS/GE Control Segments doc?

I have a suggestion for it...

It might be helpful to have information something like this in it:

The GS06 (Group Control Number) of the sender's EDI GS envelope is
used in the responding 997 transaction to enable 997 reconciliation.
It is returned to the sender in the 997's AK102 element.

In other words, the GS06 and AK102 elements are used in reconciling
outbound EDI transactions with the inbound Functional
Acknowledgments (997).

There is no provision in the ANSI X12.5 standard for returning an
ISA number in a 997.

Interchange acknowledgment and reconciliation is enabled with the
responding TA1 segment:

<<QUOTE FROM X12 standard>>
Interchange Acknowledgment TA1

To report the status of processing a
received interchange header and trailer or
the non-delivery by a network provider

CONTROL SEGMENT
TRANSACTION SETS USED IN:
None
REF ELE ID ATTRIBUTES NAME
01 I12 Interchange Control Number N0 9/9 M
02 I08 Interchange Date DT 6/6 M
03 I09 Interchange Time TM 4/4 M
04 I17 Interchange Acknowledgment Code ID 1/1 M
05 I18 Interchange Note Code ID 3/3 M
<<ENDQUOTE FROM X12 standard>>

<<<NOTE FROM D.DARNELL>>>
I could find no reference to TA1 segments in our TX SET documents..
so if there is somebody please point me to it. The TA1 segment may
be worthy of future discussion in the TX SET work group.

Meanwhile .... I would recommend that the GS06 (GS control number)
always be unique for a trading partner/functional group. You could
do this by incrementing by one every time you ran a map... and then
storing the last GS06 sent for use by the map (to increment) next
time around. If you ALWAYS have only one Functional Group per ISA..
then you could make the GS06 the same as the ISA control number
(ISA13).

COMMENTS??

Best Regards,
Dave
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Dave Darnell
Systrends, Inc
7855 South River Parkway, Suite 111
Tempe, Arizona 85284
Web: www.systrends.com
Phone:480.756.6777 x201, Mobile:602.432.3353,eFax:208.441.6982
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 - NY EDI TOP 1-24-01.doc


The CPUC has issued a Notice of the Prehearing Conference for PG&E's Gas Accord II  filing to be held on January 7, 2002.  Prehearing conference statements are to be filed by January 2, 2002.  You may recall that the PG&E filing in October was a request to simply extend their current rates for two additional years for the period of Jan. 1, 2003 through Dec. 31, 2004.  They based their request on the unresolved bankruptcy reorganization plan and uncertain gas markets.

Dan Douglas provided us a summary of the filing and my recollection is that after reviewing the filing and his summary we were of the opinion that the rate extension probably would have minimal impact on TW however their reorganization plan to convert their backbone system to an interstate pipeline via a filing at FERC could certainly have an impact.  In that regard, Jeff Dasovich has scheduled a conference call on January 8th with PG&E to discuss their FERC filing and TW will be participating in that call.

Given our initial reaction to this filing, to what extent do we want to particiapate in this proceeding and do we want to use Dan?  At minimum we had intended to have Dan file a prehearing statement for us.  However given our cash concerns, before calling Dan I wanted to make sure we were still on the same track.  Below is the link to the Prehearing Notice.  gh

http://www.cpuc.ca.gov/word_pdf/RULINGS/11886.doc


I want to leave so bad!


(If you cannot see the images in this message, click  here  to view directly on our web site.)
		 [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE]   Home  Products  History  Careers  Contact
		 We Come to You with Holiday Gift Ideas!   Never have enough time for holiday shopping?  Let Tom James solve your gift dilemma in the comfort and convenience of your home or office.  A visit from a Tom James Sales Professional saves you precious time - and that's a gift you deserve this year!       [IMAGE]    [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  Cashmere Sweaters  Cotton Ribbed Polos  Wool Polos  Basket Weave Polo Sweaters          [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  Monogrammed Cufflinks  Lambskin Blazer  Lambskin Zip Front Jacket  Cashmere Placket Sweaters          [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  Twill Microfibre Raincoats  Swatch Box  Gift Certificate  Cashmere Topcoats                    Steve Callaway , Professional Clothier   (713) 622-5678     To sign up for an appointment click here .   To receive future messages in text-only format click here .   If you do not wish to receive this type of message click here .    Order sportswear , accessories  or ready-to-wear  online with your VIP Client Number: 0003003904   ? 2001 The Tom James Company - All Rights Reserved [IMAGE]


Another national crown ... It must be nice.  We have to keep referring back
to our one and only in 1935.  But, we will never forget it!  I am looking
forward to the 28th.  Tonya and I are going to the Aggie/K-state game.  We'll
see how that goes.  Looks like your corn boys will be playing OU that
weekend.  That should be a good battle.  OU also has a week off to get ready
for you.  (I think they should be rated #2).

Things are going ok here.  I can't remember if we've talked about the sale of
HPL.  That is getting closer to happening.  I am hoping it does.  I'm ready
to go on to something else, and that would make it much easier.  Ami Chokshi
decided that she would leave the co. this week.  She is heading of to San
Fran.  No job or any specific plans yet, but it's always something whe has
wanted to do.  It would be nice to be able to pick up and do something like
that.

How's everything else going for you and the family.  We are all doing pretty
good.  I actually took last week off.  The only plans I had were to spend
time with the family.  It was great!  It really drove the point home that I
need to stop letting people/things around here set my proiorities.

Anyway, would you be able to come down for lunch on Friday?  I'm sure it's
been a while since you've had your Treebeard's.  Let me know.  Sorry I
haven't talked to you much.  I'm going to end up losing all my friends if I
don't change my ways.

D


I'll be glad to assist.

Matthew Berry@ECT
06/07/2000 04:02 PM
To: Lisa Bills/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Humberto Cubillos-Uejbe/HOU/ECT@ECT, Roseann
Engeldorf/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Sheila
Tweed/HOU/ECT@ECT, robtaylor@andrews-kurth.com
cc: Matthew F Gockerman/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: West LB affiliate registration in Texas for the LM6000 turbine deal

I have spoken to Matt Gockerman in Tax who's comfortable with West LB
creating a presence in Texas through a partnership owned by Delaware LLCs in
order to register with the Comptroller prior to receipt of the LM6000
turbines (which is estimated to be 6/20). Matt will provide the necessary
forms to West LB/Winston and will coordinate with them for timely completion.

West LB will be putting together a closing check list for this to occur,
including registration forms, ADA assignment agreement and West LB guaranty,
etc. Kay and Rob, can I ask you to coordinate what if anything needs to be on
the list from the commercial side beside the assignment under LM6000 turbine
purchase agreement.  We'll schedule a call in the next few days to coordinate
with Winston and West LB on this matter.

Thanks,
Matt


Michelle,

Carlos would be a great addition at ENA in any transactional capacity.  I
worked with him extensively (actually, I hired him), and he is terrific.

Thanks,

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 12/01/2000 09:37
AM ---------------------------

Carlos.Sole@enron.com on 12/01/2000 09:36:10 AM
To: Michelle.Cash@enron.com
cc: John.Schwartzenburg@enron.com

Subject: Opportunities at ENA

Michelle, per my voicemail as I indicated, I am trying to pursue what
opportunities may be available at EWS and both Julia Murray and Kay Mann
recommended that I contact you.  As background, I have been at EECC since
October last year where I have focused on traditional EPC contracts and
joint venture agreements with construction partners, cross-border financing
agreements principally in Mexico and merger and acquisition/strategic
investment transactions.  Before coming to Enron, I worked with the Houston
office of a New York based firm (Curtis, Mallet-Prevost, Colt & Mosle)
where I focused mostly on transactions in Mexico since we represented Pemex
on their transactions involving long and short term oil supply agreements
and CFE (Mexico's electricity commission) on its public bids for EPC and
IPP projects.  Lastly, I started my legal career in 1994 at Patton Boggs in
Washington, DC where I focused on general domestic corporate transactions
such as establishing new business entities (ie, joint venture work,
partnerships etc.), m & a work, and securities offerings.  Thanks for your
consideration and I look forward to talking with you when you return from
vacation (my extension is 6-6127).

(See attached file: EECC Resume.doc)

 - EECC Resume.doc


Shirley,

Please, make sure that I follow up on this.

Vince

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 05/02/2001
09:46 AM ---------------------------

Vince J Kaminski
05/02/2001 09:42 AM
To: Dorothy Dalton/Enron Communications@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS@ENRON
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vasant Shanbhogue/Enron@EnronXGate
Subject: Re: message from Ken Rice

Dorothy,

No problem. Please, CC-mail  me
Tom's number. One of the members of the group has a PhD in
computer science and he will join me for the call.

Vince

From: Dorothy Dalton@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS on 05/01/2001 08:53 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: message from Ken Rice

Vince:

Ken Rice received a call through a friend's referral from Dr. Tom Limperis (a
professor at the University of Michigan).  Dr. Limperis has developed a
statistical database management system he would like to show Enron.  Ken
would like you to return this call on his behalf.  He feels that you are
probably the only person who will understand and be able to determine if
Enron should have an interest.

Do you mind returning this call?  Please let me know.

Thanks!

Dorothy Dalton
Office of the Chairman
Enron Broadband Services
1400 Smith Street, EB4505
Houston, TX  77002
713-853-6724 - direct
713-853-9469 - fax


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 03/21/2001
12:48 PM ---------------------------
From: Jennifer Fraser/ENRON@enronXgate on 03/21/2001 10:30 AM
To: Jennifer Burns/ENRON@enronXgate, John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron@ECT, John
Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike Grigsby/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Fletcher J Sturm/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rogers Hearndon@ECT, John L Nowlan/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Bill White/NA/Enron@Enron, Kevin McGowan/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Gary
Hickerson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael W Bradley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vince J
Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Hunter S Shively/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin M
Presto/HOU/ECT@ECT, Adam Gross/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Jeffrey A Shankman/ENRON@enronXgate, Gary Hickerson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tamara
Jae Black/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ina Rangel/HOU/ECT@ECT, Helen Marie
Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Angie Collins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Judy Zoch/NA/Enron@ENRON,
Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT@ECT, Airam Arteaga/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacy
Weatherly/Corp/Enron@Enron, Kimberly Hillis/ENRON@enronXgate
Subject:  Trader's Roundtable Meeting - Report on Recessions and Demand
Contraction

Attached is the report I discussed yesterday. It considers the impact of last
2 recessions on demand.

Jen Fraser

713-853-4759


No news today.  I don't want to know today, as I'm drinking champagne and
ignoring the issue,


EESI Environement & Energy Weekly -- October 11, 1999

Senate EPW panel hears differing views on changing TVA

The federally owned Tennessee Valley Authority was put on the defensive at a
Senate Environment and Public Works Committee hearing last week as its
adversaries mounted an offensive against the power agency for its huge $27
billion debt and unaccountability.

With a bill (S. 1323), introduced by Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), serving as
the backdrop, the need for changing TVA,s role in an emerging competitive
electricity market was reviewed.

TVA is one of the biggest power producers in the country, and it enjoys
certain unfair privileges, according to investor-owned utilities, which are
seeking changes to TVA to level the playing field in a competitive
electricity market.

McConnell,s bill is touted as making TVA more accountable by subjecting the
power agency to, among other things, antitrust laws and to the jurisdiction
of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. McConnell, who was present at
the hearing, questioned TVA on its claim of providing low-cost power and why
it should not be brought under FERC authority.

Supporting the position of S. 1323, Robert Hewett representing TVA Watch, a
coalition led by Duke Energy and other private utilities, decried the
privileges TVA is endowed with. Hewett said TVA has the ability to set its
own wholesale and retail rates, is exempt from anti-trust laws and makes only
"token" payments in lieu of taxes to the local government. "No other entity
in the country even comes close to having this type of authority or license,"
said Hewett.

Hewett wants TVA to be subjected to antitrust laws and FERC jurisdiction. In
addition, TVA must be restricted from building new generation capacity and it
should not have preferential access to power from other federal facilities at
rates below fair market value, Hewett recommended.

Richard Munson, executive director, Northeast-Midwest Institute, continued on
the same stream as Hewett, calling TVA a national problem. Munson said TVA,s
inspector general in a recent report has highlighted "TVA,s most serious
problem * its unaccountability." Decisions by TVA,s board of directors are
not reviewed by state regulators or federal agencies and the power agency
enjoys a monopoly in its service territory so it is not accountable even to
market forces, according to Munson. Stating that TVA has been propped up by
enormous taxpayer subsidies, Munson said, "The giant utility is exempt from
hundreds of federal and state laws and regulations, it pays no federal or
state taxes, and it obtains low-cost loans because of Washington,s +implied,
support."

But Mark Medford, TVA executive vice president, cautioned that proposals such
as S. 1323 may risk compromising the low-cost, reliable electricity available
to the Tennessee Valley region.

Medford said S. 1323 would place new restrictions on TVA and expand
regulation of TVA activities, which seems unusual in the context of a
discussion of "deregulation" of the electricity industry.

Medford also argued against FERC and state regulation of TVA prices and FERC
determination of the need for new generation capacity. He said responsibility
for fulfilling those missions is placed on the three-member TVA board
nominated by the president and confirmed by the Senate. Superimposing a
higher regulatory body, such as FERC, "to pass judgment on the decision of
the TVA board in these areas seems both duplicative and inappropriate."

Medford also did not think that antitrust laws should be applied to TVA
because it would be unfair to TVA ratepayers. "When a private utility
violates the antitrust laws, its stockholders bear the cost. However,
governmental entities like TVA have no stockholders, and the financial costs
of such penalties have to be borne by the people who are supposed to be
served," said Medford.

Medford asserted that investors now hold all of TVA,s debt that finances the
power program. He said TVA debt is neither backed by the federal government
nor is it supported by mortgages on TVA plant property and equipment. It is
secured solely by the financial operation of TVA as well as bond covenants
and the provisions of the TVA Act, Medford said.

Also, Medford said TVA has been on the path of debt reduction in the last
three years, bringing down the debt by $1 billion.

Austin Caroll, representing the Kentucky Managers, Association, a group of
municipal and rural electric cooperative utilities, did not totally agree
with the principles of S. 1323, though it did want some changes to be made to
TVA.

Preceding the examination of S. 1323 was a hearing on the nomination of TVA
board members -- Skila Harris and Glenn McCullough.

Harris served until recently as the executive director of the Secretary of
Energy Advisory Board, managing the work of the Tennessee Valley Advisory
Committee, which comprises of representatives from groups interested in the
future of TVA.

McCullough previously served on the executive committee of the Mississippi
Municipal League and as the director of the Mississippi office of the
Appalachian Regional Commission.

The TVA board of directors has three members serving nine year staggered
terms.


Please review and comment by Monday.

Thanks,

Reagan


FYI (Some of these things you may already know).

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Shepperd, Tammy R.
Sent:	Tuesday, November 13, 2001 5:00 PM
To:	Tijerina, Shirley; Hogan, Irena D.; Solis, Melissa; Bates, Kimberly; Harvey, Claudette; Black, Tamara Jae; Coleman, Venita; Rode, Tina; Holcombe, Tina ; Clyatt, Julie; Roberts, Chaun; Vuittonet, Laura; Jones, Melissa; Rangel, Ina; Presas, Jessica; Salinas, Michael; Collins, Angie; Finnels-Neal, La Donna; Snow, Dina; Villarreal, Alexandra; Young, Becky; Irvine, Geraldine; Rybarski, Amanda; Choate, Heather; Chapman, Christy; Leigh, Lorie; Zarsky, Lisa; Gordon, D'ann; Butler, Shelly; Noske, Linda J.
Cc:	Schoppe, Tammie; Brooks, Loretta; Lopez, Susan; Duree, Janelle
Subject:	Move Related Issues

As you all know, our move is scheduled for this weekend.  Hopefully,  you and your groups are all progressing well in your preparations for the move this Friday. Please take the time to read the information contained in this message because most of the information contains reminders or FYI items and will be important to you and your group.  Please forward this to those in your group that may need this information.

?	Voicemail instructions - Please have everyone in your group clear all new voicemail messages by 5:00 PM, Friday, 11/16.  All saved messages, greetings and recorded names will be saved.  If a message is left before cutover the message will be saved, but the message light will not be displayed when you arrive.  As a precautionary meassure please check voice mail upon your arrival Monday morning even if the message light isn't on.

?	Building access - ECS will not be available for general access until Monday morning at 5:00 AM.  Due to the gas and power moves being combined, it is unlikely that the move team will be prepared for the POC's to come in on Sunday to unpack.  (Separate instructions will be generated for those who are needed to test trading applications.)  NOTE: Only those whose names have been approved and submitted to security will be allowed access on Sunday.
o	Monday - 5:00 AM for all employees

?	Security & badges -  All POC team members should be familiar with the routes into ECS as we discussed at our recent move meeting.  Please be sure to share this information with all of the people in your group.  If you need additional copies of the floor plans that have the access routes highlighted, please contact Carli Smith (5-3473). Please stress to everyone to have their badges with them at all times.  No one will be allowed access without their badge.  If anyone tries to access the building from the garage via the skyring and they do not have their badge, they will be sent back through the garage to the street level to walk across the street to the round kiosk in the Enron building lobby to get a guest pass and then proceed back to ECS via the 2nd floor and the skyring.

?	Move team colors - As mentioned at the move meeting, the following is a list of the color designations (vests) for the various teams that will be on the floor when we move in.
o	Red - Move Team
o	Orange - Desktop Support/IT
o	Green - Telephony

?	Newspaper subscriptions - The delivery location for all newspaper subscriptions need to be changed to ECS 05/06.  It is our intention to have all daily newspapers delivered to the mail desk located in the ECS 2nd floor corridor.  It will be the responsibility of the assistants to either pick up the papers for their group or designate someone in their group to pick up the papers.  If your papers continue to be delivered to your old floor of ECN, contact Sunny Rodgers (3-6116).

?	Move boxes -  Please encourage your group to pack and bring no more than about 6 boxes per person.  You may call Facilities (3-6300) if you need to request additional boxes.

?	Move labels -  If you run out of labels or if you are missing any labels, please call Carli Smith (5-3473) to have additional or missing labels printed.

?	Laptops - Important - Please ensure that all cable locks have been removed from all laptop computers by 5:00 PM on Friday.  If any cable locks are left on the computers they will be destroyed by the move team in order to move the computers as scheduled.

.	Bottled water - Every kitchen has an ice machine that also dispenses filtered water.  The large bottles of water (5 gallon) will not be allowed on the floor.  We would also like   to discourage the use of small bottles of water due to limited storage space and the availability of filtered water at several locations.

?	Phone sets - Although most of you are aware of this, we just wanted to remind you that there will be only one phone on each desk - either a turret or an Avaya, but not both.  Do not tag your phones, a new phone will be waiting for each person on their desk in the new building

I hope I have covered some of the outstanding questions or issues you might have, but if I have missed something, please let me know.  Thanks so much for all your help and hard work.


In anticipation of the imminent closing of the UBSW Energy transaction, please have all outstanding employee expenses in your possession filed through Enron's XMS system as soon as possible.   Note to approvers - please approve these expense reports quickly.   Enron will process and pay all pre-closing expenses.   After transaction closing,  payments  for expenses submitted before closing (and put into Enron's XMS system) will be sent to your last known address or direct deposited into your account.

Enron has committed to processing and paying any expenses incurred prior to transaction closing.   If not completed this week, pre-closing expenses should be submitted on a  hard copy expense report form which will be available at  www.enron.com.

There will be a series of e-mails coming out over the next few days highlighting the Travel & Entertainment policies of UBSW Energy and the procedures for processing and payment.

If you have any questions, please contact Hope Vargas (3-5280) or Georganne Hodges (3-0430).


I just thought of one other thing we need to discuss with Credit in our
meeting.  I've asked them to get back to me about this several times and
haven't heard.

In the collateral annexes, we have interest on collateral computed at 360
days.  So we don't have problems with Canadian counterparties, I would like
to change that to 365/366 accross the board.  I asked them if there was any
specific reason why we've got interest on collateral at 360, like maybe it's
the custom in the bank/dealer markets.  Anyway, I'd like to get that
answered.


fyi re:  Lutz.  mhc
---------------------- Forwarded by Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT on 09/07/2000 05:38
PM ---------------------------

Cynthia Barrow@ENRON
09/06/2000 06:53 AM
To: Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Dolores Lenfest/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Re: Privileged and Confidential--Project Triple Lutz

Michelle, looks good.  I don't know the details of this one, but if you get
the Buyer to agree it is very generous for the employee.  Regarding Pension
Plan, if you get Dee the list of employees, we can get an idea of the
unvested amounts by employee.  Since this appears to be an asset sale, Enron
can either pay this outside of the plan or consider it forfeited.

Thanks
Cb

Michelle Cash@ECT
09/05/2000 08:07 PM
To: Timothy J Detmering/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Fran L Mayes/HOU/ECT@ECT, mstuart@velaw.com, Sheila
Knudsen/Corp/Enron@ENRON, David Oxley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Anne C
Koehler/HOU/ECT@ECT, fmackin@aol.com, Dolores Lenfest/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Cynthia Barrow/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mary Joyce/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Privileged and Confidential--Project Triple Lutz

Tim,

Anne Koehler asked me to provide general employment terms for Project Triple
Lutz.  I have spoken with persons in HR and benefits and have put together
the following "headlines" for employee matters.  This list is a first cut,
based upon my discussions with persons I could reach today; thus, it may not
be exhaustive.  Details of certain issues, as described below, will have to
be worked out.

Of course, your team may choose to modify/delete items from this list,
depending on the exact nature of the deal.  In the interest of time, however,
I am sending this list to our lawyers at V&E to begin drafting the employee
provisions of the sale agreement, which I understand you would like to see on
Thursday.  Any modifications based upon your team's comments should not be
difficult.

The employment provisions may include:

Buyer will hire all employees identified by Seller.
The hired employees will have a title that is at least the same/equivalent as
their title at Enron for a two-year period after closing.
Buyer will give all hired employees credit for years of service at Enron for
purposes of participation in Buyer's benefits (though not accruals), thus
allowing the hired employees to have immediate participation in Buyer's
benefit and compensation plans (e.g., 401k, vacation eligibility, etc.).
The hired employees will be paid, at a minimum, the same base salary they
earned at Enron (which would include the merit increase for 2001) for a
two-year period after closing.
The hired employees will receive the same level of total cash compensation as
their last year of Enron employment for one full year after closing (the
buyer can make this happen through base salary, bonus, etc.).
The hired employees will receive benefits (e.g., health insurance, life
insurance, etc.) that are comparable to those they had in their last year of
employment with Enron (although we probably will have some discussions over
our sick leave policy, which is generous).
Buyer will retain severance benefits at Seller's level for one year after
closing, after which the hired employees will be eligible for severance under
the Buyer's plans (with credited service).
Before Buyer terminates the employment of a hired employee (other than for
cause -- to be defined), Buyer shall inform Seller, which will have the right
to re-employ the employee at Enron, with credited service.
For employees with less than 5 years of service, some concession for unvested
portion of Cash Balance Plan may be necessary.

Open issues/questions include:

Equity:  What is to be done with unvested equity?  For example, in December,
every Enron employee will be granted stock options worth 25% of their base
salary (based on the Black-Scholes valuation).  Also, persons with other
equity grants may forfeit those grants upon closing.  An evaluation of the
various plans and participants will be necessary to determine exactly where
any issues exist, as well as possible resolutions of those issues.  In light
of the appreciation in Enron's stock, this equity issue may be significant.
Pension:  What will happen to hired employees with potential eligibility
under Enron's pension plan?

If you have any questions about these issues, please give me a call at x
3-6401.  If I receive additional feedback, I will let you know.

Thanks.

Michelle


Daren & John,

See the attached document regarding gas deliveries/nominations for the
Cleburne site. Right now, I'm planning to be in the Houston office on
Thursday, August 3, 2000 so we may be able to meet then. If there are any
questions, please call me for additional info.

Michael Mazowita

Phone: (248) 442-4823
Cell: (248) 345-4002


As discussed in our 3-Rivers/King Ranch meeting, I have set up purchases from
the liquids group and the other 3rd parties at HGPL mtr 0012.  Due to
bridgebacks, I had to create new deal numbers for the days prior to 2/16/99.
(I went back to Dec 1999, in case it is needed.)  Please see the deal #s
below.

Teco  113858 &169759
HPLR Liquids  114099 & 169765   (existing deal to cover excess residue)
Swift  93779 & 169761
ERAC  138094 & 169760
Tejones 133173 & 169762

Mandy - I understand that you will be setting up the buy and sale with HPLR
Liquids to cover the transport on HGPL.

Let me know if you have any questions.

D


Al,

What about a lunch or breakfast on Monday or Tuesday next week?
I am traveling later this week.

Vnce

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Al Arfsten" <arfsten@bflassociates.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Tuesday, November 13, 2001 10:06 AM
To:	vkamins@enron.com
Subject:	Lunch?

Vince:   I have returned from SF and look  forward to our next meeting.  I mentioned to Bjorn that we might get  together and hoped we might do a lunch meeting this time.  Bjorn and I  could drop by and pick you up to make it simple.  How about today or  tomorrow?  Please advise.  Al Arfsten 713 965  2158


John,

Like beauty, it's in the eye of the beholder.
My experience is that sometimes people with unconventional
backgrounds have most to offer.

Vince

John J Lavorato@ENRON
07/12/2000 09:50 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Resume of a former FX trader

This is the most bizarre resume I've seen in a long time.


Rakesh,

Can you ask a lawyer to  review it?

Vince

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 04/06/2001
04:15 PM ---------------------------

LawrenceLRTNMT@aol.com on 04/05/2001 10:15:34 PM
To: vkamins@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Non-Disclosure Agreement

P. O. Box 2227
Livermore, California  94550
April 4, 2001

Dr. Vince J. Kaminski
Vice-President of Research
Enron Corporation
P. O. Box 1188
Huston, Texas  77251

Vince,

    I have cleared my calendar, and I am looking forward to meeting with you
in Houston on May 4th.

    Transmitted herewith is the agreement that you requested.

    Thanks.  Have a great weekend.

Larry Thorne

Attachments:  Non-Disclosure Agreement

 - Non-disclosure Agreement.pdf


Happy Birthday to you!

You look like a monkey,
And you smell like one too!!

Especially if you partied like a madman last night!!

Enjoy your day and the weekend!

You deserve and will get the very best!!!
--
Sharon Snyder
ssnyder@shelton.org


Folks:
Do we have a draft master firm that we can send to JD Irving with credit erms?
What about the amendment to the Master Swap -- Have we sent it yet?
JDI said they have received nothing
DId I gve you guys everything you need for these contracts?
Thanks
JEn


To make sure that everyone is on the same page with our FERC activities, here
is the list of current / pending activities.  Please advise if others exist
or I've mistakenly put someone's name on a project.

1. EPMI, etal Intervene on PX Credit Waiver for Interim Activity

Due 3.13.01
Enron Lead Richard Sanders

2. EPMI Intervene & Protest on ISO Motion to Obligate Information from
Suppliers

Due  3.16.01
Enron Lead Sue Mara

3. PX Issues with Implementing Revised Breakpoint for January Timeframe

Due 3.9.01 (with Supplemental Comments)
Enron Lead Alan Comnes

4. Tucson Electric PX Chargeback Complaint

Due 3.19.01
Enron Lead Uncertain

5. Strategic Energy ISO Complaint

Due 3.20.01
Enron Lead Uncertain

6. PNM PX Chargeback Complaint

Due 3.22.01
Enron Lead Uncertain

7. Civil Litigation Pleadings at FERC

Due Uncertain
Enron Lead Joe Hartsoe

8. EPMI PX Chargeback Complaint

Due
Enron Lead Richard Sanders

9. ISO Market Stabilization Plan

Due Not Yet Filed at FERC (may file 4.1.01), Comments to ISO Staff on 3.12.01
Enron Lead Sue Mara

11. Response to FERC Staff Report

Due  3.22.01
Enron Lead Sue Mara (will develop talking points to discuss with allies /
enemies)
Coalition Lead WPTF  Sue Mara   EPSA Joe Hartsoe

12. Rehearing on FERC 3.9.01 January Refund

Due 4.8.01
Enron Lead Will not respond if EPSA or WPTF

13. EES Support to Waive Underscheduling Penalty Fee of ISO

Due No action right now
Enron Lead Sue Mara


---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 11/06/2000
06:44 PM ---------------------------

wayne.mays@enron.com on 11/06/2000 05:53:49 PM
To: ddelain2@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Approval for reviewer

MAYS,WAYNE E  has suggested reviewers and submitted them for your approval.
You may review/modify this list of reviewers by logging on to PEP at
http://pep.corp.enron.com  and going to Supervisor Services.  Please
remember, no feedback can be completed on MAYS,WAYNE E  until you have
approved the list.


Renee,

Question: Are the GE performance guarantees completely voided by the use of
inlet chillers?  The first sentence in the first bullet point concerns me.

I'm not sure how the stuff included in the second series of bullet points
fits in.  Are these changes in scope, suggestions, conditions?

I think we would be better off increasing the length of the change order to
include the pertinent stuff, but not attaching the letter as a reference.

Thanks,

Kay

Renee Alfaro@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
02/06/2001 09:41 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Blue Dog Change Order

Kay,

Sorry about that.  I forgot I had the letter electronically, or I would have
included it with the Change Order.  Please see the attachment below.

N-1 is the exhibit where the pricing is updated, so they would be different
for CO1 and CO2.

Thanks
Renee Alfaro
Phone: 713-646-7281
Fax: 713-646-6158
Email: ralfaro@enron.com

 - Chiller Provisions.pdf

	Kay Mann@ENRON
	02/05/2001 04:52 PM

		 To: Renee Alfaro/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Blue Dog Change Order

Opps.  I thought we were talking about the same CO.  Could you please send
me  a copy (or electronic file) of the letter you are incorporating by
reference?

This CO will need to be signed by Janet Dietrich, Managing Director.

Is the replacement N-1 the same as the replacement N-1 in CO #2?

I'll give this the final once over as soon as I get the letter.

Thanks (and sorry for the confusion),

Kay


you have all the answers don't you?  don't you think that someone will figure out your little plan?  oh and thanks for coming down here and giving me some news.....fink


I am booked on a flight 1 week from Friday 8th of February - I land in Birmingham at 9 a.m.  I should be to Huntsville by 11 a.m.  I am staying until Sunday.  I think Ashley and Jackson are going to stay here for now unless you report granddad is doing much worse next week.  We will see how that goes.  Talk to you soon.  Did you call last night?
PL


[IMAGE]	 	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]

             [IMAGE] [IMAGE]   [IMAGE] [IMAGE] Upgrades  [IMAGE] DownGrades  [IMAGE] Coverage Initiated  [IMAGE] Stock Splits  [IMAGE] Buybacks  [IMAGE] Pos Pre-Announce  [IMAGE] Neg Pre-Announce     [IMAGE]   [IMAGE]   [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE] Unsubscribe  [IMAGE] Update my Membership / Profile  [IMAGE] Forgot Username / Password  [IMAGE] Add / Edit Alerts  [IMAGE] View My Alerts   [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE]   [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]    [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] 	  As requested, your News Alert for YHOO  follows from EquityAlert.com.     Form 144: Filing to Sell 900000 Shares of YAHOO INC (YHOO)   Jan 17, 2002 (Vickers Stock Research via COMTEX) --   Document Processing Date: January 17, 2002  Filer: KOOGLE, TIMOTHY Relation: Vice Chairman  Stock Name: YAHOO INC Stock CUSIP: 984332106  Stock Symbol: YHOO Exchange: NASDAQ  Transaction date: November 29, 2001 Shares for sale: 900000 Value held: $14227830  Broker: GOLDMAN SACHS & CO  Copyright (c) 2002, Vickers Stock Research Corporation. All rights reserved.  -0-       [IMAGE]    ***IMPORTANT NOTICE AND DISCLAIMER REGARDING THIS COURTESY EMAIL***  At your request, as a subscriber to our service, this email alert is being sent to you as a courtesy and is for information purposes only. We are a financial news re-distributor. We are not an investment advisory and do not purport to tell or suggest which companies you should monitor or which securities you should purchase or sell.   In addition, not withstanding our policy of prohibiting employees from buying or selling securities of an advertising company for a period of 20 days following dissemination of the advertisement, we may not be able to effectively monitor our employees to ensure compliance with the same. Consequently, there may be sales and/or purchases of such securities by our employees prior to, during and immediately following the dissemination of the advertisement.   Please note that (1) this email may not contain the full text of the press release issued by, or the research or other reports regarding, the Monitored Company; and (2) the text of the advertisement, the press release and/or reports were obtained from third party sources and were not written, generated or edited by us; accordingly, we make no representations or give any assurance as to the accuracy or completeness, nor have we conducted any independent investigations of, the disclosures regarding the subject matter of such releases and reports.   Please note that links to the advertising company and/or Monitored Company are provided for your convenience. We assume no obligation for the content of such sites.   All information contained herein should be independently verified by you with the advertising company or with Monitored Company or any other sources you prefer.   [THIS IS ONLY A SUMMARY OF, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO, THE "EQUITYALERT SUBSCRIBER AGREEMENT AND DISCLAIMER." PLEASE VISIT http://www.equityalert.com/home/disclaim.asp  FOR ACCESS TO OUR COMPLETE DISCLAIMER]        	  [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE]   [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE]  [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] Stock  Quote [IMAGE]   [IMAGE] Stock  Chart [IMAGE]   [IMAGE] Covered  Calls  [IMAGE]   [IMAGE] Company  Profile [IMAGE]   [IMAGE] [IMAGE]  [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE]   [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] Option  Details  [IMAGE]   [IMAGE] Black  - Scholes [IMAGE]     [IMAGE]  Power Option PLUS Logo    [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE]


Sale is based on IF


Anna's information is not completed and I bet her cost center is different
from yours (company the same?).


Hello,
Just a reminder that Duke Energy and Enron Marketing Power are now sending
their NP15/SP15 information to us.  So if you have purchases from them,
please do not include with your other purchases.
 Thank you very much
 DJ Energy

P.S.  Please see attachment

 <<NP15 SP15 Participant List.doc>>

 - NP15 SP15 Participant List.doc


As you are all aware, Enron and UBS have entered into an agreement for the sale of certain assets of the wholesale gas and power trading organization.  As part of that agreement, the management of UBS may speak to you over the next several days about an opportunity in that new organization.  If so, we encourage you to consider such an offer. However, if you are not employed by UBS, you remain an Enron employee.  If you have specific questions regarding your employment arrangements and job responsibilities please contact Anne Labbe in Human Resources at 5-7809, or feel free to contact either Jim Fallon or Dave Delainey directly.


Mary,

Hope she's OK.  Next week is fine.  How about Wed?

Ruby

-----Original Message-----
From: Fischer, Mary [mailto:Mary.Fischer@ENRON.com]
Sent: Monday, October 15, 2001 5:48 PM
To: Ruby Kinsfather
Subject: RE: LUNCH

Ruby,

This week has gotten shot to hell.  My mom is in the hospital (no big deal,
just an inconvenience).  Are you free next week for lunch?  Name the day.
Let me know.

Mary

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and
may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply
to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all
copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************


Start Date: 1/14/02; HourAhead hour: 15;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002011415.txt


Paul:  Here's additional info for the "curtailment" data that we're pulling
together.

Utility Pricing for Core Gas Customers

Prior to the month in question, the utility forecasts gas prices based on
NYMEX monthly prices.  So for example, based on November's forecast, the
utility sets prices to be charged to core consumers in December.

When December's over, the utility compares forecast prices with actual
prices.  If the forecast was too low, and there's an undercollection, the
utility will increase January's price forecast by "just enough" to make up
for the December undercollection.  If prices were too high and there's an
overcollection, the utility will reduce January price forecast by just enough
to refund the overcollection.

If the overcollection/undercollection is very large, the utilities have
generally spread out the "true-up" over several months to avoid "rate shock"
one way or the other.  However, under the current circumstances, the
utilities may be less willing to spread it out, and may wish to recover the
entire undercollection in the following month.  In short, there's at least a
one-month lag in customer prices to account for differences in forecasts
versus actual.


Priveleged and Confidential

The Alberta Department of Resource Development (ADRD) released a draft Market
Surveillance Amendment Regulation today which contains proposed amendments to
the current Market Surveillance Regulation that will be in force prior to the
PPA Auction later this month.   A number of changes have been made in
response to: (i) concerns raised by potential Power Purchase Arrangement
Bidders about PPA Owners intentionally witholding capacity,  and (ii) other
apparent deficiencies with the original MSA Regulation.  We may wish to use
the opportunity to informally  advocate for a specific change to the MS
Regulation (Enron Canada will be filing formal written comments on other
unrelated issues) that would mitigate one of the risks of a negative outcome
on Project Stanley.

I understand that Blakes has undertaken a review of the EUA or Market
Surveillance Regulation to determine what sanctions could result from a
negative outcome on Project Stanley and therefore they can confirm whether I
have identified all the applicable sections of the EUA and Regulations that
address this issue.  Based on my quick review I see a conflict between the
Market Surveillance Regulation and the Power Pool Rules.

Section 15 of the current Market Surveillance Regulation provides the Power
Pool Council with the authority to impose sanctions on market participants
that are found to be in contravention of the Electric Utilities Act, the
Regulations, the rules of the power pool, etc.  There are four specific
sanctions including: (i) fine, (ii) imposition of terms and conditions on the
market participants activitives, (iii) direction to the market participant
not to engage in certain activity, and (iv) direction to the market
participant to pay the costs of an investigation and hearing.  None of these
specific sanction include suspension or revocation of a market participants
Power Pool Registration.

In contrast to Section 15 of the Market Surveillance Regulation, Section
9(1)(d) of the EUA authorizes the Power Pool Council to change the rules of
the Power Pool.  Rule 2.5.3 of the Power Pool Rules allows for the Power Pool
Council to revoke a Participant's registration for having contravened the
Power Pool Rules.

I believe it is necessary to at least consider whether Enron Canada should
call Sid Carlson (the ADRD Official responsible for the Market Surveillance
Amendment Regulation) and verbally advocate for an amendment to the Market
Surveillance Regulation that would serve to expressly remove any conflict
between the MS Regulation and the Power Pool Rules in relation to the
authority of the Power Pool Council to revoke a participants registration.
An amendment that would limit the authority of the Power Pool Council to the
four sanctions in the MS Regulation would have the postive effect of
eliminating the risk of Enron Canada being suspended from the Power Pool (and
therefore remove one of the risks inherent in Enron Canada's participation in
the PPA Auction).

Admittedly, there is also a risk that our raising the issue could backfire
and result in the ADRD entrenching such authority of the Power Pool Council
into the Regulation and therefore deprive Enron Canada of arguing (in the
event of a negative result on Project Stanley) that the Power Pool Council
does not have the authority to revoke Enron Canada's Participant
registration.   Aleck advises that the IMO in Ontario has the authority to
revoke the registration of a market participant and he is of the view that it
is reasonable for the Power Pool Council in Alberta to have recourse to such
a sanction.   I understand from Dalton McGrath that Blakes is of the view
that there is a very low probability of Enron Canada being sanctioned by way
of suspension or revocation of its Power Pool registration in the event of a
negative outcome on Project Stanley.

While I appreciate there are pros and cons to saying anything on this issue,
the MS Regulation is not frequently amended and the prospect of there being
another opportunity to influence its amendment in this regard prior to the
resolution of Project Stanley is very remote.   It is for this reason that I
raise the matter now as the ADRD has indicated it will accept comments only
until 12:00 p.m. Wednesday July 12.

Regards,

Rob


Life Insurance Banner


oh

-----Original Message-----
From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 4:34 PM
To: erichardson@sarofim.com
Subject: RE:

means i could be tired afterwards.

    -----Original Message-----
   From:   Erin Richardson <erichardson@sarofim.com>@ENRON
   Sent:   Thursday, October 18, 2001 4:12 PM
   To:     Lenhart, Matthew
   Subject:  RE:

   what does running have to do with going out?

   -----Original Message-----
   From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
   Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 4:05 PM
   To: erichardson@sarofim.com
   Subject: RE:

   i might.  i need to go running or something.

       -----Original Message-----
      From:   Erin Richardson <erichardson@sarofim.com>@ENRON
      Sent:   Thursday, October 18, 2001 3:58 PM
      To:     Lenhart, Matthew
      Subject:  RE:

      no, i have to run some errands after work.  are you?

      -----Original Message-----
      From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
      Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 3:52 PM
      To: erichardson@sarofim.com
      Subject: RE:

      you partying tonight?

          -----Original Message-----
         From:   Erin Richardson <erichardson@sarofim.com>@ENRON
         Sent:   Thursday, October 18, 2001 3:38 PM
         To:     Lenhart, Matthew
         Subject:  RE:

         cool.

         -----Original Message-----
         From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
         Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 2:35 PM
         To: erichardson@sarofim.com
         Subject: RE:

         it was good.  had some good meetings and stuff like that.  didn't
      party
         or
         anything.

             -----Original Message-----
            From:   Erin Richardson <erichardson@sarofim.com>@ENRON
            Sent:   Thursday, October 18, 2001 2:28 PM
            To:     Lenhart, Matthew
            Subject:  RE:

            how was portland

            -----Original Message-----
            From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com
   [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
            Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 12:49 PM
            To: erichardson@sarofim.com
            Subject: RE:

            great.  good to hear.  i got back last night.

                -----Original Message-----
               From:   Erin Richardson <erichardson@sarofim.com>@ENRON
               Sent:   Thursday, October 18, 2001 12:15 PM
               To:     Lenhart, Matthew
               Subject:  RE:

               yeah, it was horrible, i didn't think i was going to be able
   to
         make
            it.
               when did you get back.

               -----Original Message-----
               From: Lenhart, Matthew [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com]
               Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 11:54 AM
               To: erichardson@sarofim.com
               Subject:

               did you miss me while i was gone?

   **********************************************************************
               This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its
   relevant
            affiliate
               and
               may contain confidential and privileged material for the
   sole
      use
         of
            the
               intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or
         disclosure
            by
               others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
         recipient
            (or
               authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the
         sender
            or
               reply
               to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com
   and
         delete
               all
               copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments
   hereto)
         are
            not
               intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create
   or
            evidence
               a
               binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any
   of
         its
               affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party,
   and
      may
            not
               be
               relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel
   or
            otherwise.
               Thank you.

   **********************************************************************


Great!  Thanks,

Fletch

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Webb, Jay
Sent:	Tuesday, September 04, 2001 5:57 PM
To:	Sturm, Fletcher J.
Subject:	turning off product autosuspend

Hi Fletch.

All products with the internal trader id of FSTURM
have been disabled for autosuspension if the system
detects that the Stack Manager has gone away.

Also, you should receive a call from the head of
support to help you get the VPN software.  Let
me know if you do not hear from her.

--jay


Nordic Power should be included
European Coal only they have US included in another Contract
Nordic Weather should be included
European Bandwidth is fine
Yes include US, UK and Asian Brent

Mark/Tana please add Nordic Power and Nordic Weather to the exhibit

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	McKinney, Lara
Sent:	Wednesday, October 03, 2001 5:08 AM
To:	Shults, Bob
Cc:	Greenberg, Mark; Jones, Tana
Subject:	RE: Norwegian Energy and First Energy

The list looks good.  Let me just make sure my understanding of the titles is correct...

Lara
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Shults, Bob
Sent:	02 October 2001 21:12
To:	McKinney, Lara
Cc:	Greenberg, Mark; Jones, Tana
Subject:	Norwegian Energy and First Energy

Lara,

We are finalizing a Broker Client deal with the referenced companies.  We are giving them access to European Gas, European Power, European Weather, European Bandwidth, European Coal and Brent Crude.  Is it appropriate to use the following as the exhibit for this transaction?

UK and European Gas
UK and European Power [McKinney, Lara]   - In this case 'European Power' does NOT include Nordic Power?
European Coal [McKinney, Lara]   - Do you mean ONLY European Coal and do not want to include US as well?
European Weather [McKinney, Lara]   In this case 'European Weather' does NOT included Nordic Weather?
European Bandwidth [McKinney, Lara]   There is an initiative to launch Asian Bandwidth products.  This is a ways from launch yet, but do you want it included?
Brent Crude [McKinney, Lara]   This one is pretty broad - since you have not listed a country, can I assume that you mean US, UK, and Asian Brent products?

Bob Shults
EnronOnline LLC
Houston, Texas 77002-7361
713 853-0397
713 825-6372 cell
713 646-2126
bob.shults@enron.com


Just wanted to let everyone know that Black and Decker is moving me to San
Francisco the first of September.  Don't have an address yet, but cell will
be the same.   CJ

303-809-3541

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp


---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 08/29/2000 02:01
PM ---------------------------

Matthew F Gockerman@ECT
08/29/2000 01:57 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: VEPCO contact list

Matt Gockerman
713.853.3979
EB4678
mgocker@enron.com
832.492.7328

	From:  Kay Mann @ ENRON                           08/29/2000 09:01 AM

To: Reagan Rorschach/NA/Enron@Enron, John Moore/Corp/Enron@Enron, Christi L
Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Terri Austin/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
nwodka@bracepatt.com, Lloyd Will/HOU/ECT@ECT, Larry Soderquist/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Matthew F Gockerman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris Herron/Corp/Enron@Enron, Mitch
Robinson/Corp/Enron@Enron, Gautam Gupta/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brian
Kerrigan/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Ozzie Pagan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Heather Kroll/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey
Keenan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Chapman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Herman Manis/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: VEPCO contact list

I'm going to have an updated contact list prepared.  Please email me with
your telephone, location, email address, and cell phone number, if desired.

Please let me know who should be added to this list.

If you are receiving this vis a cc, I have your information.

Thanks,

Kay


let me know if you want me to bring something.

love
e

"K. Bass" <daphneco64@bigplanet.com> on 06/08/2000 09:57:35 AM
Please respond to "K. Bass" <daphneco64@bigplanet.com>
To: Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: dinner

Let me know if you can come.  Just email me.  I'm taking the kids out for a
while.  I will pick up more steaks so don't bring your own.  If you can't
come, I'll freeze them, o.k.?  LU-M
 - att1.htm


Antitrust training in EB46C1.


Once the agreement is signed, it would prohibit us from issuing the golden
share, as well as the shares to ENA for enron online, unless we put that on
the disclosure schedule.  However, since I don't know that we can get a
golden shareholder today, we should probably consider putting this on the
disclosure schedule to the merger agreement.  Is it problematic for you to
disclose this to the other side?  If so, we might be able to have the
golden interest issued to an individual who can later transfer them to a
coporate shareholder.  Let me know what you think.

"Taylor, Mark E (Legal)" <Mark.Taylor@ENRON.com> on 11/05/2001 02:16:19 PM
cc:
Subject:  Capital Contribution documentation

Under normal circumstances we would not need an Enron Corp. resolution
and in fact the Corporate Secretary and Treasury offices can handle
moving the money around so we do not propose to do an Enron Corp. Board
action unless you folks think it is absolutely necessary.  The other
resolutions we can get in place easily.

I think Notre Dame agreement contains restrictions on what we can do
with capital stock of subsidiaries after it is signed -- does that mean
we need to issue the Golden Share today?

Mark Taylor
Vice President and General Counsel
Enron Wholesale Services
1400 Smith Street - EB3892
Houston, Texas 77008
(713)853-7459
(713)646-3490 (fax)

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate
and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of
the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or
reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete
all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************

**********NOTE**********
The information contained in this email message is intended only
for use of the individual or entity named above.  If the reader
of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or
agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you
are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  If you
have received this communication in error, please immediately
notify us by telephone (214-746-7700), and destroy the original
message. Thank you.


Dan Walters: Blame game over  California's energy crisis will continue for
years

(Published July 24, 2001)

The wrestling match between politicians and Enron Corp. moved into a more
intense arena over the weekend when a state Senate investigating committee
sought contempt penalties because the huge energy company has refused to
turn  over internal documents.

Although Houston-based Enron owns no major power plants in California, it
has  adopted the toughest stance of all energy companies against the
multiple  investigations of why wholesale energy prices spiked so high. And
it has become,  in turn, a whipping boy for California politicians.

At one point last spring, state Attorney General Bill Lockyer said he wanted
criminal charges against Enron and its chairman, Kenneth Lay. "I would love
to  personally escort Lay to an 8-by-10 cell that he could share with a
tattooed  dude who says, 'Hi, my name is Spike, honey,' " Lockyer said. With
less colorful  language, Gov. Gray Davis has often castigated Texas-based
companies as price  gougers -- even though Texas firms have been fairly minor
suppliers to  California.

Some of it is just buzzword politics. Lockyer and Davis know that
Californians dislike anything associated with Texas, and Lay has been one of
President Bush's major political supporters. Enron, meanwhile, cites the
rhetoric as evidence that Lockyer, Davis and legislative investigators are
interested less in finding the truth than in seeking scapegoats. Enron also
filed a lawsuit challenging the legality of the Senate's subpoenas of
trading  data.

Most other energy companies have complied with the demands, creating
Sacramento repositories of the data under elaborate confidentiality
agreements  worked out with the special Senate committee headed by Sen.
Joseph Dunn, D-Santa  Ana. But Enron has refused, and on Saturday, Dunn
submitted a report asking the  Senate for "an appropriate coercive
sanction."

Does Enron have something to hide? Or does it sincerely believe that what's
happening in California is political scapegoating? Are the companies' fears
about the confidentiality of the data sought by the Senate justified? Would
data  be selectively leaked to show the firms in the worst light? Would data
be used  by competitors? Or could the information find its way into the hands
of  class-action attorneys?

Dunn, a prominent trial attorney himself, insists that confidentiality will
be protected and that the information being sought is only for legislative
purposes. But Enron and the other companies have some reason to be wary of
turning over confidential information to politicians. Similar information
was  leaked -- without penalty -- in last year's investigation of former
state  Insurance Commissioner Chuck Quackenbush. And there are indications
that private  lawyers are working closely with investigators.

Mike Aguirre, the San Diego attorney seeking a "smoking gun" to prove
collusion among energy companies, supplied Dunn's committee with a few
dissident  Duke Energy workers who alleged, in highly publicized hearings,
that the firm  had manipulated production at its San Diego plant to create
artificial shortages  and drive up spot market power prices. Duke then
refuted the charges by  releasing some excerpts from the records of the
Independent System Operator, the  controller of California's power grid,
indicating that ISO had ordered the plant  operational changes.

Aguirre subsequently asked the governor's office to pressure the ISO -- now
under Davis' direct control -- to release all of the Duke-related documents
that  would show, he says, that the firm actually manipulated the situation.
Duke and  other companies insist that the ISO-held documents are proprietary.
Aguirre  pleaded with one Davis adviser in an e-mail that "we need your help
in properly  getting this information out." But Aguirre, in an interview,
said he had not yet  obtained cooperation from Davis aides.

The political and legal struggle to affix blame for California's energy woes
will continue for months, perhaps years. The crisis will cost ratepayers at
least $50 billion, and they'll want to know why as they make out their
utility  bill checks.

The Bee's Dan Walters can be reached at (916) 321-1195 or dwalters@sacbee.com
.


Panel OKs Subpoenas for Energy Companies
Electricity: Special state Senate committee will demand pricing information
in inquiry into whether California has been gouged.
By CARL INGRAM, MIGUEL BUSTILLO, Times Staff Writers

SACRAMENTO--The Senate Rules Committee agreed Monday to issue subpoenas to
eight out-of-state power generating companies demanding documents on pricing,
bidding and other aspects of electricity sales in the state.
Sen. Joe Dunn (D-Santa Ana), chairman of the special Senate committee that is
investigating whether power wholesalers are illegally profiteering from
California's energy crisis, said he expects the companies to resist. That
would set the stage for a court fight, he said.
In addition to subpoenas aimed at the private generating companies, the
committee also put the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power on notice
that unless it voluntarily provides information on its power sales to the
state, the data will be subpoenaed as well. And the panel threatened to
subpoena records of the state Department of Water Resources unless it turns
over information on how it has spent more than $7 billion to keep electricity
flowing in California.
Under Senate regulations, Dunn's panel needed approval of the Rules Committee
to issue the subpoenas.
Industry executives deny that they have broken any laws in selling
electricity at premium prices to California's financially strapped utilities
and the state water department.
The subpoenas will be issued to Reliant Energy, which Gov. Gray Davis has
publicly accused of price gouging, Dynegy Energy Services Inc., Williams
Energy, Enron Corp., NRG Energy Inc., Duke Energy, Mirant Inc., and AES Corp.
Dunn said executives of the generators seemed cooperative when the
investigation was launched two months ago. Since then, he said, they have
raised barriers, including demands that the confidentiality of their
documents be protected.
The demand for information from the Los Angeles DWP and the state's water
resources department were pushed by Sen. Ross Johnson (R-Irvine), vice
chairman of the rules panel.
"Why are we not attempting to subpoena the Los Angeles Department of Water
and Power? There certainly have been suggestions that they have profited,"
Johnson said, referring to reports from the California Independent System
Operator about large profits that DWP made by selling power to the rest of
the state.
Reflecting the views of many lawmakers, Johnson said the Legislature also
needs information on power purchases that the state water department makes
from wholesalers and the bidding strategies used to make the bids.
Davis has refused to make details of the purchases public. He contends that
if generators knew how much the state was spending on power, they might raise
their prices. Several news organizations and a legislator are suing to make
the information public.
Senate President Pro Tem John Burton (D-San Francisco), chairman of the Rules
Committee, opposed issuing subpoenas to the city and state departments, at
least temporarily, leading to the agreement for a one-week delay before
subpoenas would be issued to the agencies.
The big energy companies also took a hit Monday from a leading advocacy group
for the poor.
The Pacific Institute for Community Organization, a coalition of faith-based
groups that has pressed for California to cover more of the millions of
working citizens without any health insurance, voiced concern that the energy
crisis is hitting the poor hardest.
The group, which scheduled a Capitol rally today, plans to urge political
leaders to use the economic power of the state's huge pension funds to
leverage the companies.
The two pension funds own at least $1.2 billion in stocks and bonds in most
of the major firms involved in the state energy crisis, from Enron of Texas
to Duke of North Carolina, the advocates said.
"They could bring the voice of stockholders into the debate, as a major
stockholder, and take a more enlightened view of what is happening to
California," said activist Jim Keddy. "We really have no voice inside those
companies right now."


Hi Kate, Lindy Conrad a trader from Seattle City Light called me today.  She
thinks the price for deal # 537565.01 should be $360.00 instead of $350.00.
She said that Sean Crandall was our trader.

Let me know what you find out.
Thanks,
Melissa


eSource presents free Dow Jones Interactive training

Introduction to Dow Jones Interactive
Learn about the content available through Dow Jones Interactive, and how to quickly put it to work for you. Including setting up your own custom clips and monitoring topics of interest to you.

June. 8	  9:00 - 10:00 AM  EB560

Advanced
Learn how to be more efficient on Dow Jones Interactive.  Put some power tools to work for you.  Learn how to employ codes, use search history, and customize.  Hands on time is provided.

			June. 8	  10:00 - 11:00 AM  EB560
  June. 8	    11:00 - 12:00 AM  EB560

Seats fill up fast! To reserve a seat, please call Stephanie E. Taylor at 5-7928

?	No Shows will be charged $50.00

Check the eSource training page at http://esource.enron.com/training.doc for additional training sessions and vendor presentations

http://esource.enron.com

<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>


This deal has been changed to firm energy.

Kate

	From:  Sharen Cason                           01/22/2001 01:42 PM

To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: #502327

This deal is entered as CAISO energy , with a Palo Verde delivery point.  Let
me know.

Thanks!


Attached is a revised Credit Watch listing for the week of 5/7/01.   Please
note that Upstream Energy Services, LLC (& Upstream Energy Company) were
placed on NO TRADES.  Also, Bethlehem Steel Corporation and Westlake
Petrochemical Corporation are new additions that require Credit approval.
If there are any personnel in your group that were not included in this
distribution, please insure that they receive a copy of this report.
To add additional people to this distribution, or if this report has been
sent to you in error, please contact Veronica Espinoza at x6-6002.
For other questions, please contact Jason R. Williams at x5-3923, Russell
Diamond at x5-7095, or Veronica Espinoza at x6-6002.


FYI - see e:mail below from Sarah Novosel.

gngr
713-853-7751
----- Forwarded by Ginger Dernehl/NA/Enron on 11/13/2000 11:20 AM -----

	Sarah Novosel
	11/13/2000 11:02 AM

		 To: Ginger Dernehl/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: FERC Staff Report on Northeast Markets

Ginger:

Would you please circulate this summary to everyone in government affairs.
The summary is similar to the summary Christi sent to you on Friday on FERC
Staff's report on the midwest and southeast regions.

Thanks Ginger

Sarah

----- Forwarded by Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron on 11/13/2000 12:01 PM -----

	Sarah Novosel
	11/13/2000 11:53 AM

		 To: Mark Dana Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul J Broderick/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris
Dorland/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom May/Corp/Enron@Enron, Robert
Stalford/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeffrey Miller/NA/Enron@Enron, Narsimha
Misra/NA/Enron@Enron, Joe Quenet/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul Thomas/EU/Enron@Enron,
Ricardo Perez/NA/Enron@Enron, jader@enron.com, Michael Brown/NA/Enron@Enron,
Mark Bernstein/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Healy/HOU/ECT@ECT, John
Llodra/Corp/Enron@ENRON, George Wood/Corp/Enron@Enron, Janelle
Scheuer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joe Gordon/Corp/Enron@Enron, Stephen
Plauche/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jennifer Stewart/NA/Enron@Enron, David
Guillaume/NA/Enron@Enron, Tom Dutta/HOU/ECT@ECT, Daniel
Allegretti/NA/Enron@Enron, Howard Fromer/NA/Enron@Enron, Tom
Hoatson/NA/Enron@Enron, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Donna
Fulton/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary
Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard
Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, John J
Lavorato/Corp/Enron@Enron, Kevin M Presto/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janet R
Dietrich/HOU/ECT@ECT, David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: FERC Staff Report on Northeast Markets

Attached is a summary of FERC Staff,s November 1, 2000 report on its
investigation of the Northeast region.  The report is very encouraging
because it is comprehensive and recommends many of the changes and solutions
that Enron has been advocating for years.  The report is also encouraging
because it indicates a significant level of understanding of the northeast
markets (and the problems in these markets) by the FERC people who worked on
this report.  Because this is only a brief summary, the entire report
(particularly sections 4 and 5) should be read in detail.  A copy of the
report is attached.

Please let us know if you have any questions or comments.

Sarah


Brian who?

-----Original Message-----
From: Kitchen, Louise
Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 3:23 PM
To: Oxley, David
Subject: Re: NETCo HR update

Has Brian had his contract yet?
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld


I'm taking a look at this now.  Dan says we need to file this Friday to make sure we  meet the 10-day requirement in the statute.  Will be trying to get individual customers to sign on as well.  Already have call in to UC/CSU attorney.
-----Original Message-----
From: Dan Douglass [mailto:douglass@earthlink.net]
Sent: Sunday, September 23, 2001 12:08 AM
To: ARM; Gary Ackerman; Vicki Sandler; Anderson, Robert; Merilyn Ferrara; Max Bulk; John Yurkanin; Steve Huhman
Subject: Draft Application for Rehearing

Attached for your review and comment is a draft application for rehearing of the Commission's Thursday Decision 01-09-060 suspending the right of direct access.  Although we have prevailed (at least for now) on the issue of retroactivity, the decision still violates various provisions of state and federal law.  If any party wishes to preserve the right to legally challenge this decision, it must file an application for rehearing within ten days.  The attached draft is tentatively dated September 28, meaning that it would be filed next Friday.

The primary reasons cited for why rehearing should be granted are as follows:

The Decision violates procedural due process guarantees.

The failure to hold hearings violates Public Utilities Code section 1708.5(f).

 The Commission's reliance on material outside the record violates due process.

 The Decision violates the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution.

 The threatened retroactivity is contrary to law and in excess of the Commission's authority.

 The Commission acted contrary to law and in excess of its authority.

 The Decision's purported findings are not supported.

The Commission has impermissibly converted a ratemaking proceeding into a quasi-legislative proceeding.

Although WPTF members have not had an opportunity to consider whether they wish to support such a filing, WPTF is included as a named party in the attached because of the fact that AReM and WPTF have jointly made numerous other filings in this proceeding.  WPTF members will need to determine if they wish to support this effort.

I look forward to seeing your comments.  Thanks, and have a gtood weekend!

Dan

Law Offices of Daniel W. Douglass
5959 Topanga Canyon Blvd.  Suite 244
Woodland Hills, CA 91367
Tel:   (818) 596-2201
Fax:  (818) 346-6502
douglass@energyattorney.com <mailto:douglass@energyattorney.com>


FYI  ... Pam Becton had a problem with when Starr VPP showed up on the GL ...
here is Whiting's meeting notes with her.
---------------------- Forwarded by David Baumbach/HOU/ECT on 05/14/2001
07:34 AM ---------------------------
From: Greg Whiting/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/04/2001 11:40 AM
To: David Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: RE: Star VPP

Met with Pam and here is the deal.  Pam wants the P&L for the April deals to
show up in May GL.  What I suggested to her was that rather than do anything
for the deals in risk or Portfolio that Pam defer the P&L on her company and
release it the next month.  This keeps things normal in our worlds and Pam
controls when she sees the P&L on her company.  She has agreed to do this.

There will be a new twist starting in July.  Starr is supposed to become 3rd
party and the payment date is supposedly two months after the fact.  Pam is
checking with legal to see if there is to be a complete unwind and rebooking
because of structure changes to make the deal 3rd party or if we can just
change the counterparty on the deals.  I'm sure we will be the last to know
as usual.

    Greg x35399