
 >In article <1993Apr19.020359.26996@sq.sq.com>, msb@sq.sq.com (Mark Brader) 

MB>                                                             So the
MB> 1970 figure seems unlikely to actually be anything but a perijove.

JG>Sorry, _perijoves_...I'm not used to talking this language.

Couldn't we just say periapsis or apoapsis?

 