Well, here are the results of the Mathematica test which I posted to
this newsgroup.  The "test" was the following command:



I was just curious how fast the plot command would be executed on
various Macintosh machines as well as other personal computers and
workstations.  The results are posted below:

Machine		System		Math vers.	# of trials	time, min

PB 170		7.0.0 with	2.1		2		2:08
		tuneup/8MB
		RAM/5MB for
		Mathematica

DEC 5000	Ultrix v4.2a	2.1 for		1		0:25
		DEC RISC	
					
IIsi		7.1/cache@96MB	1.2f33Enh.	1		4:30
		25MHz/5MB RAM/
		3MB for Math./
		w/ 68882

C650		7.1/8MB RAM			2		0:32

Q800		8MB/Cache@384/	1.2				1:01
		4MB for Math.	

Sparc		SunOS4.1.3					0:14
Station		40MB RAM

SGI Iris/4D	R3000 RISC					<0:01
		processor
		version

Sparc		SunOS4.1.2	2.1 				0:26
Station2

IIsi		7.1						3:15

NeXT		NeXTSTEP 2.1	1.2				2:38
Cube		68030 based/
		w/ coprocessor	

NeXT		NeXTSTEP 3.0	1.2		5(ave)		0:52
Cube		68040/25MHz/
		20 MB RAM

IIsi		17MB/8MB for	2.102 Enha			3:15
		Math.			
		w/ 68882

NeXT		16MB RAM/			1 		0:37
		25 MHz 040/
		Workspace
		Manager 2.1

Funny how the IIsi running at 25 MHz is slower than other equivalent
machines, lots slower in fact.  Perhaps the version of Mathematica
makes a difference or the fact that not much RAM was allocated.
Another interesting thing is how fast the SGI did it.  Wow. 

Basically, though, I wouldn't draw any conclusions from this data.  It
seems that Mathematica's speed is dependant on a lot of variables.  I
was just curious how different machines would measure up.  

Well, if you have any questions or if I forgot something, just drop me
a line at "cmmiller@iastate.edu".  

Chad