    >I guess that you are a person who dislikes contact with
    >people of ethnic minority. However, your argument again falls
    >flat on its face. You state that you, under an
    >anti-discrimination bill, would be forced to associate with
    >others [homosexuals, I assume] against your will. How do you
    >know that you do not associate with them now, except they may
    >be closeted? Would you like to change your argument to read
    >"forced to associate with truthfully homosexual people
    >against my will"? You have no proof that anyone you now know
    >may not be homosexual and this punches a large hole in your
    >argument. Is it your belief that a homosexual comes in only
    >one flavour (sic) and that is the camp mincing type? Prove
    >it. You cannot.

You are quite incoherent. Perhaps YOU should be forced to associate with
some people against YOUR will. I think a nice large group of skinheads
in a locked basement for 12 hours will wonderfully educate you.

After all, as you don't believe in Freedom Of Asscoiation, you can't
complain can you.

Bloody turdlet ...


-- 
There are actually people that STILL believe Love Canal was some kind of
environmental disaster. Weird, eh?