#I find myself unable to put these two statements together in a
#sensible way:
#
#>Abortion is done because the mother can not afford the *pregnancy*.
#
#[...]
#
#>If we refused to pay for the more expensive choice of birth, *then*
#>your statement would make sense.  But that is not the case, so it doesn't.
#
#Are we paying for the birth or not, Mr. Parker?  If so, why can't the
#mother afford the pregnancy?  If not, what is the meaning of the
#latter objection?  You can't have it both ways.

Birth != pregnancy.  If they were the same, the topic of abortion would 
hardly arise, would it, Mr. Skinner?
